Agenda packet — Lawndale City Council, December 18, 2023 (part 7 of 9)

Policy CF-4.1: Maintain Capacity. Encourage the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) to maintain sufficient levels of storm drainage service, improve flood control facilities and channel segments, and implement other best practices in order to protect the community from flood hazards.

Action CF-4d: Continue to review development projects to identify potential storm drain and drainage impacts and require developments to include measures to ensure that off-site runoff is not increased beyond pre-development levels during rain and flood events.

Action CF-4e: Project designs shall minimize drainage concentrations, minimize impervious coverage, utilize pervious paving materials, utilize low impact development (LID) strategies, and utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce stormwater runoff.

Policy CF-5.1: Cooperation with Utilities Providers. Work cooperatively with utility providers to promote the provision of adequate telecommunications services and facilities to serve the needs of existing and future residents and businesses.

Action CF-5a: Confer with telecommunications providers regarding major development plans and participate in the planning of the extension of utilities.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-35 Utilities and Service Systems Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS-2: Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? Impact Analysis: The General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population and employment growth within the Planning Area, and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies.

As described in Section 3.0, and summarized in Table 3-4, buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a total of 15,405 housing units, a population of 47,430 people, 5,351,026 square feet of nonresidential building square footage, and 9,208 jobs within the Planning Area. This represents development growth over existing conditions of an additional 3,942 housing units, an additional population of 9,482 people, an additional 808,000 square feet of non-residential building square footage, and an additional 2,738 jobs within the Planning Area.

As discussed above, water service in the Planning Area is provided by the GSWC. GSWC’s 2020 UWMP indicates that GSWC can meet projected water demands under normal-, single dry-, and multiple dry-year conditions through 2045. However, the General Plan Update is expected to result in increased population growth in the Planning Area, and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies, which have not been accounted for in the UWMP. The General Plan Update would result in a water demand of approximately 8.0 AFY within the Planning Area, which would be a net increase of 1.6 AFY (25 percent) over existing conditions.

As discussed, the California Urban Water Management Planning Act requires water suppliers to prepare an UWMP every five years to identify short-term and long-term water demand management measures to meet growing water demands during normal, dry, and multiple-dry years. Current (2020) population used in the UWMP is determined utilizing the DWR Population Tool. However, as noted in the UWMP, the current DWR Population Tool does not contain 2020 census data, and therefore the values may change once the data is available. Additionally, conditions that may have been altered by the pandemic could result in changes. According to the UWMP, projected population is based on the current estimated population (using the DWR Population Tool) and projected growth from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) (2020). The UWMP assumes SCAG’s growth rate to be constant throughout the planning period until 2045.

As discussed in Section 5.12, Population and Housing, SCAG is the responsible agency for developing and adopting regional housing, population, and employment growth forecasts for local Los Angeles County governments, among other counties. SCAG provides household, population, and employment projection estimates in five-year increments through 2045. While Project growth projections are anticipated to exceed SCAG’s 2045 population, SCAG’s projections, which are compiled using a number of sources including adopted plans, historical trends, and interviews with local jurisdictions, tend to be more accurate on a regional level than on a local or city level. It is likely that through a combination of market changes, catalytic projects, updated land use direction in the General Plan, and other factors, Lawndale could capture either more or less of expected regional growth than forecasted by SCAG. Discrepancies between Project and regional forecasts can also be attributed to the RHNA process. One of the objectives of the Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-36 Utilities and Service Systems proposed Project is to accommodate the City’s 2021-2029 RHNA; SCAG’s Connect SoCal growth forecasts through 2045 do not consider the regional housing need for the 2021-2029 period, as jurisdictional allocations were not known at the time of SCAG’s Connect SoCal adoption. The regional housing needs and associated General Plan growth projections will be included as part of SCAG’s future growth forecasts.

Therefore, future updates to the UWMP will account for future residential growth associated with the City’s 2021-2029 RHNA and the additional residential and non-residential growth opportunities provided by Project implementation, and would identify short-term and long-term water demand management measures to meet growing water demands during normal, dry, and multiple-dry years.

As site-specific development is not currently proposed, there is the potential that for future qualifying projects, a Water Supply Assessment would be required pursuant to SB 610. The Water Supply Assessment discerns whether the expected demand from the development being proposed has been accounted for in the forecasted demands in the most recent UWMP. A Written Verification of Supply per SB 221 is prepared as a condition of approval for a subdivision map of 500 units or more. Considered a fail-safe mechanism to provide sufficient evidence that adequate water supplies are available before construction begins, the Written Verification of Supply is also prepared/adopted by the water supplier and approved by the land use authority. Depending on the project, one or both of these analyses may be required. Development proposals that may not warrant a Water Supply Assessment and/or Written Verification of Supply, but meet the definition of a project under CEQA, would still require an analysis of sufficient water supplies in the CEQA process. The Lawndale Municipal Code includes several provisions related to water conservation, including: Chapter 8.40, Water Conservation, which allows the City Council to declare voluntary and mandatory water restrictions, as appropriate to water supply conditions; Chapter 15.28, Green Building Standards Code, which adopts CALGreen’s regulations to improve water efficiency and conservation; and Chapter 17.88, Water Efficient Landscape, which promotes water-efficient landscaping in new and substantially altered or expanded existing development projects.

Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions directed towards water conservation to ensure that adequate water supply, treatment, and distribution capacity is available to meet the needs of future development without negatively impacting the existing community. These actions would result in reduced water consumption on a per capita basis that would help offset the increased demand from additional development within the Planning Area. Proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-6.1 promotes water conservation strategies using innovative strategies and contemporary best practices. Policy RM-6.2 encourages all public and private landscaping in new development and significantly altered redevelopment projects to be designed to reduce water demand, prevent erosion, decrease flooding, and reduce pollutants through the installation of irrigation systems, the selection of appropriate plant materials, and proper soil preparation. Action RM-6b ensures City participation in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Action RM-6c directs the City to work with local water agencies and service providers to: implement groundwater recharge programs; participate in water conservation programs; establish water conservation education programs; require water efficient landscaping; expand the production and use of reclaimed water; and require water conservation devices in new development and rehabilitation projects. Proposed Community Facilities Element Policy CF-2.1 coordinates with local water districts when considering land use changes in order to assist the districts in planning for adequate Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-37 Utilities and Service Systems capacity to accommodate future growth. Policy CF-2.2 encourages the use and expansion of recycled water. Policy CF-2.3 considers the impacts of climate change in projections used to establish which water supply, distribution facilities, and conservation efforts are necessary to sustain future water demands.

Action CF-2a requires the development review process to ensure sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the proposed development prior to approval of the project.

Action CF-2c directs the City to cooperate with the State, regional, and local water agencies and suppliers to participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Through implementation of existing Federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, the environmental impacts to water supplies would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-6.1: Conservation. Promote residential, commercial and institutional water conservation strategies using multiple innovative strategies and contemporary best practices.

Policy RM-6.2: Landscaping. Encourage all public and private landscaping in new development and significantly altered redevelopment projects to be designed to reduce water demand, prevent erosion, decrease flooding, and reduce pollutants through the installation of irrigation systems, the selection of appropriate plant materials, and proper soil preparation.

Action RM-6b: In cooperation with the State, Regional and local water agencies and suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted. Cooperate with these agencies to establish standards and regulations for the use of recycled water in development projects.

Action RM-6c: Work with local water agencies and service providers, regional wholesalers, and private developers to encourage water conservation in the following ways:
• Implementing groundwater recharge programs;
• Participating in water conservation programs operated by the local and Regional water districts;
• Establishing water conservation education programs;
• Requiring Water-Efficient Landscaping for public and private areas, including parks and recreational facilities, in accordance with the Water-Efficient Landscape requirements;
• Expanding the production and use of reclaimed (recycled) water; • Requiring the incorporation of water conservation devices, including low flush toilets, flow restriction devices, and water conserving appliances in both new public and private development projects and rehabilitation projects.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-38 Utilities and Service Systems Policy CF-2.1: Water Supply Needs. Coordinate with local water districts when considering land use changes in order to assist the districts in planning for adequate capacity to accommodate future growth.

Policy CF-2.2: Use of Recycled Water. Encourage the use of recycled water in development projects and landscaping; implement best practices (e.g., dual plumbing) to expand recycled water use when safe, financially feasible, and available.

Policy CF-2.3: Climate Change Impacts. Consider the impacts of climate change in projections used to establish which water supply, distribution facilities, and conservation efforts are necessary to sustain future water demands.

Policy CF-2a: Through the development review process, require that sufficient water supply and water infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project, pursuant to Water Code Section 10910 and Government Code Section 66473.7.

Policy CF-2c: In cooperation with the State, Regional, and Local water agencies and suppliers, participate in programs that seek to expand the availability and use of recycled water for irrigation where feasible and legally permitted.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS-3: Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Impact Analysis: As discussed above, the City’s local sewers discharge into the LACSD facilities and are conveyed for treatment at LACSD’s JWPCP. The JWPCP has a capacity of 400 MGD and treats approximately 260 MGD of wastewater, resulting in a remaining capacity of 140 MGD. As shown in Table

5.19-5, LACSD projects an average flow of 423 MGD at the JWPCP for 2050, which exceeds the plant’s current permitted capacity by 23 MGD. The LACSD continues to monitor and adjust its projected flows and would expand treatment capacity as needed based on these updates. No current plant expansion is being planned, as ongoing water conservation efforts throughout the region continue to lower current wastewater flows.

Based on the anticipated growth under the General Plan Update, as described in Section 3.0, and summarized in Table 3-4, buildout under the General Plan Update could yield a net change over existing conditions of an additional population of 9,482 people within the Planning Area. Using the wastewater generation rate of 83 gpcd from LACSD’s 2012 Clearwater Program Master Facilities Plan, growth associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would generate 3.9 MGD of wastewater within the Planning Area, a net increase of 0.8 MGD (25.8 percent) over existing conditions.

As noted above, the General Plan Update enables additional development but does not include specific development proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would require a separate Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-39 Utilities and Service Systems environmental review and compliance with regulations in existence at that time to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists. LACSD charges annual wastewater sewer fees through its Wastewater Treatment Surcharge Program, as well as sewer connection fees through its Connection Fee Program, in order to maintain and expand LACSD’s wastewater services. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes goals, policies, and actions to ensure adequate wastewater facilities capacity to serve the Project’s projected demand. Proposed Land Use Element Policy LU-2.6 would notify adjacent jurisdictions and agencies of proposed land use actions within the Planning Area that may affect them. Proposed Community Facilities Element Policy CF-1.3 directs the City to maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate regional, State, and Federal laws, to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in Lawndale. Policy CF-1.8 directs City participation in the preparation of plans and programs addressing regional infrastructure and public services issues. Action CF-1a directs City coordination with outside service providers and other agencies regarding their public facility plans and to provide local input on goals, objectives, and projects. Policy CF-1d requires any new development or major redevelopment that would put local and/or regional facilities at or near capacity to upgrade those facilities. Policy CF-3.1 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to promote safe and reliable wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure to serve existing and future development. Policy CF-3.2 directs coordination with the CSMD to encourage facilities to provide sufficient capacity for Lawndale, and that wastewater infrastructure within the City is adequately monitored and maintained. Policy CF-3.3 proposes the City take a comprehensive approach to water infrastructure that integrates sewer system planning with potable and recycled water systems, stormwater systems, and increased conservation awareness. Policy CF-3a directs the City to require that sufficient wastewater infrastructure capacity is available to serve proposed development prior to approval of the project; ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development; and to periodically review the fee schedules for sewer connections and revise fees as necessary to cover the cost of related services and facilities. The implementation of existing Federal, State, and local regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions would ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity and impacts would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

LAND USE ELEMENT
Action LU-1e: Initiate a coordinated process to regularly review and adjust population assumptions and forecasts in conjunction with the Department of Finance, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the County of Los Angeles in order to adequately plan for growth, including jobs-housing balance projections.

Policy LU-2.6: Regional Growth. Notify adjacent jurisdictions and agencies of proposed land use actions within the Planning Area that may affect them and take appropriate action to consider and respond to their concerns.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-40 Utilities and Service Systems Goal CF-1: Infrastructure and Public Services. A community with adequate, reliable public and quasipublic infrastructure and services to support existing and future development.

Policy CF-1.1: Capital Improvements. Maintain and finance the capital improvement program to ensure the timely implementation of the General Plan and the adequate and efficient provision of public facility and municipal improvements.

Policy CF-1.3: Public Facility Plans. Maintain and implement public facility master plans, in collaboration with appropriate Regional, State, and Federal laws, to identify infrastructure needs, funding sources, and implement improvements for public facilities and services in Lawndale.

Policy CF-1.5: Infrastructure Rehabilitation. Regularly maintain and rehabilitate public facilities and critical infrastructure to extend its useful life; prioritize infrastructure improvements in areas targeted for near-term redevelopment and in areas designated as lower-income and/or disadvantaged communities.

Policy CF-1.8: Regional Issues. Continue to participate in the preparation of plans and programs addressing regional infrastructure and public services issues.

Policy CF-1.10: Regional Services Providers. Collaborate with the various regional facility and service providers to deliver high levels of service to Lawndale residents, and to plan for new development.

Policy CF-1.11: Capital Improvement Planning. Encourage agencies to carry out long-range capital improvement planning, which includes funding methods for the construction of projects that are compatible with regional land use planning goals and objectives.

Action CF-1a: Regularly coordinate with outside service providers and other agencies regarding their public facility plans and provide local input on goals, objectives, and projects.

Action CF-1b: Maintain records regarding the quality and status of public facilities and critical infrastructure and use this information to inform the capital improvement planning process.

Action CF-1c: Study mechanisms for funding and phasing of new infrastructure.

Action CF-1d: Require any new development or major redevelopment that would put local and/or regional facilities at or near capacity to upgrade those facilities.

Action CF-1e: Participate in regional and sub-regional planning forums that may address matters affecting the quality of life in Lawndale and the region.

Policy CF-3.1: Wastewater System. Work with appropriate service providers to promote safe and reliable wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure to serve existing and future development.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-41 Utilities and Service Systems Policy CF-3.2: Adequate Infrastructure. Coordinate with the County of Los Angeles Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District to encourage facilities to provide sufficient capacity for Lawndale, and that wastewater infrastructure within the City is adequately monitored and maintained.

Policy CF-3.3: Integrated Systems Planning. Develop a comprehensive approach to water infrastructure that integrates sewer system planning with potable and recycled water systems, stormwater systems, and increased conservation awareness.

Action CF-3a: Through the development review process, continue to cooperate with the County of Los Angeles Consolidated Sewer Maintenance District to ensure adequate wastewater facilities are provided and maintained in the community. Specifically, the City should:
• Require that sufficient wastewater infrastructure capacity is available to serve the development prior to approval of the project;
• Ensure the project applicant has paid the required fees prior to occupancy of any new development; and
• Periodically review the fee schedules for sewer connections and revise fees as necessary to cover the cost of related services and facilities.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS-4: Would the Project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Impact Analysis: Future development of projects as contemplated under the General Plan Update may increase the population within the Planning Area by an additional 9,482 people. As described above, the City has achieved a disposal rate of 2.1 PPD per resident in 2021. Assuming these disposal rates remain constant throughout the life of the General Plan Update, the new growth under General Plan buildout would result in a net increase of approximately 19,912.2 PPD ofsolid waste over existing conditions, which equals 9.6 net TPD or 3,634.0 net tons of solid waste per year.

The City’s projected increase in solid waste generation associated with 2045 buildout under the General Plan Update is within the permitted capacity of the Olinda Alpha Landfill, Sunshine Canyon Landfill, and El Sobrante Landfill, where the vast majority of waste from the City was disposed of in 2019. Olinda Alpha Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 17.5 million cubic yards as of 2020, is permitted a maximum throughput of 8,000 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2036. Sunshine Canyon Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 77,900,000 cubic yards as of 2018, is permitted a maximum throughput of 12,100 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2037. El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of approximately 143,977,170 cubic yards as of 2018, is permitted a maximum throughput of Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-42 Utilities and Service Systems 16,054 TPD, and has enough projected capacity to serve residents and businesses until approximately 2051, beyond the 20-year planning horizon of the General Plan Update. In addition, the City disposes solid waste to a number of other landfills and the Southeast Resource Recovery Facility. Conservatively assuming the Olinda Alpha Landfill and Sunshine Canyon Landfill reach full capacity during the 20-year planning horizon of the General Plan Update, the El Sobrante Landfill would have adequate capacity to accommodate the City’s projected solid waste generation under buildout of 49.8 TPD. Further, it is more likely that future solid waste would be distributed to the other landfills serving the City.

In addition, all future development would be required to comply with the mandatory commercial and multifamily recycling requirements of AB 341, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste. Furthermore, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to responsibly manage and reduce solid waste.

Proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-2.1 ensures compliance with local, Regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling and composting. Policy RM-2.2 supports efforts of the solid waste service provider to maintain adequate waste disposal, recycling and refuse services in the City, and periodically reviews waste collection performance to verified adequacy of service. Policy RM-2.3 directs City participation in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and to ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region. Policy RM-2.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy RM-2.6 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve State and Federal mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for service delivery. Policy RM-2.7 promotes Citywide educational programs related to recycling. Action RM2a ensures solid waste collection activities, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Action RM-2c requires standard language is included in request for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use BMPs to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates. Action RM-2e encourages recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials through increased participation in single-family and multi-family residential curbside recycling programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and landscape waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques.

Through the implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions, this is a less than significant impact.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy RM-2.1: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, Regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling and composting.

Policy RM-2.2: Solid Waste Collection. Support efforts of the solid waste service provider to maintain adequate waste disposal, recycling and refuse services for present and future residents Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-43 Utilities and Service Systems and businesses, and periodically review waste collection performance to verified adequacy of service.

Policy RM-2.4: Source Reduction and Recycling Efforts. Participate in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region.

Policy RM-2.5: Organic Waste. Work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste, including landscaping, Christmas trees, composting and mulch, and other sources of organic waste, to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas.

Policy RM-2.6: Fees and Funding. Work with appropriate service providers to periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve State and Federal mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for service delivery.

Policy RM-2.7: Public Education. Promote Citywide educational programs to inform residents of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.

Action RM-2a: On an ongoing basis and in compliance with State law, ensure solid waste collection activities, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan.

Action RM-2c: Include standard language in request for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use best management practices to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates.

Action RM-2e: Encourage recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials, including the following:
• Increased participation in single-family and multi-family residential curbside recycling programs;
• Increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and
• Reduce yard and landscape waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

USS-5: Would the Project comply with Federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-44 Utilities and Service Systems Impact Analysis: As discussed in the settings section, Chapter 8.32, Solid Waste – Collection and Management, of the Municipal Code establishes mandatory solid waste and recycling collection to comply with the requirements of AB 939 and AB 341. The City has also established disposal and mandatory recycling requirements for commercial facilities, single family residential, and multifamily residential premises to comply with State law diversion requirements. As permitted by AB 939, the City authorizes a private solid waste franchisee (i.e., Republic Services) to handle the City’s solid waste and requires Republic to cooperate in the preparation of solid waste disposal characterization studies and the preparation of waste stream audits. Republic and the City work together to submit information to meet the reporting requirements of AB 939, or any other law or regulation, to reach the solid waste and recycling goals mandated by AB 939.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to responsibly manage and reduce solid waste in compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations. Proposed Resource Management Element Policy RM-2.1 ensures compliance with local, Regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling and composting. Policy RM-2.2 supports efforts of the solid waste service provider to maintain adequate waste disposal, recycling and refuse servicesin the City, and periodically reviews waste collection performance to verified adequacy of service. Policy RM-2.3 directs City participation in source reduction and recycling techniques to reduce the amount of solid waste sent to landfills and to ensure adequate landfill capacity in the region. Policy RM-2.5 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to collect and compost green waste to distribute for use in parks, medians, and other municipal areas. Policy RM-2.6 directs the City to work with appropriate service providers to periodically review collection, recycling, and disposal fees to achieve State and Federal mandates, meet community expectations, and reflect cost efficiencies or increases for service delivery. Policy RM-2.7 promotes Citywide educational programs related to recycling. Action RM-2a ensures solid waste collection activities, facility siting and construction of transfer and/or disposal facilities, operation of waste reduction and recycling programs, and household hazardous waste disposal and education programs are consistent with the Los Angeles Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. Action RM-2c requires standard language is included in request for services and in City agreements requiring contractors to use BMPs to maximize diversion of waste from the landfill in order to meet the City’s specified diversion rates. Action RM-2e encourages recycling, reuse, and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials through increased participation in single-family and multi-family residential curbside recycling programs; increased participation in commercial and industrial recycling programs for paper, cardboard, and plastics; and reduced yard and landscape waste through methods such as composting, grass recycling, and using resource efficient landscaping techniques.

Through the implementation of existing regulations and the General Plan Update policies and actions, future development implemented by the General Plan Update would continue to comply with management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste and impacts would be less than significant.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-45 Utilities and Service Systems Policy RM-2.1: Compliance with State Legislation. Comply with local, Regional and State regulations regarding waste diversion, source reduction, recycling and composting.

Policy RM-2.7: Public Education. Promote Citywide educational programs to inform residents of the benefits of recycling and appropriate recycling options and locations.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-46 Utilities and Service Systems

5.19.6 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Section 4.0, Basis of Cumulative Analysis, identifies the methodology used to determine the potential for cumulative growth and development to interact with the proposed Project to the extent that a significant cumulative effect relative to utilities and service systems may occur. The geographic setting for utilities and service systems considers development within the City as well as the service areas specific to water, wastewater conveyance and treatment, and solid waste, which serve the larger region.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects, or have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Impact Analysis: As discussed, water service in the Planning Area is provided by the GSWC. In addition to the Project, cumulative projects within the City would receive water service from GSWC. Similar to future development associated with Project implementation, cumulative development projects would be located within areas that are already developed and serviced by the GSWC. Additionally, Lawndale Municipal Code Section 3.14.090, Water Users Tax, imposes a tax on water users in the City and would help fund necessary infrastructure improvements. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the Project does not propose or authorize development nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded water facilities. Cumulative development projects are anticipated to occur gradually as development occurs in the Planning Area and would be required to pay applicable development impact fees to ensure water facilities can be constructed/expanded, if necessary. Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of utilities and water conservation. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on water facilities to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to water facilities would not be cumulatively considerable.

Project implementation may result in increased population growth in the Planning Area, and a corresponding increase in the demand for additional water supplies. Similar to future development associated with Project implementation, cumulative development projects would require an analysis of sufficient water supplies through provisions in SB 610 and/or the CEQA process. Additionally, future development associated with the Project and cumulative projects would be required to comply with existing Federal, State, and local regulations, including the Municipal Code, to conserve water and ensure the efficient use of available water supplies. Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of utilities and water conservation. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on water supplies to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to water supplies would not be cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-47 Utilities and Service Systems Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects, or result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Impact Analysis: As discussed, the City and LACSD provide wastewater services to the Planning Area. In addition to the Project, cumulative projects within the City would be provided wastewater services by the City and LACSD. Similar to future development associated with Project implementation, cumulative development projects would be located within areas that are already developed and serviced by the City and LACSD. The City would review each site to determine if sufficient local and trunk sewer capacity exists to serve each specific development project. Pursuant to Lawndale Municipal Code Section 13.08.070, a building permit would not be issued if the anticipated sewage from a proposed project is found by the City Engineer to exceed the capacity available in the public sewer. Lawndale Municipal Code Chapter

13.08, Sewer Capacity – Peak-flow Charges, provides for sewer connection and facilities expansion fees for the City’s local wastewater transmission lines. The specific impacts of providing new and expanded facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the Project does not propose or authorize development nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded wastewater facilities. Cumulative development projects are anticipated to occur gradually as development occurs in the Planning Area and would be required to pay applicable development impact fees to ensure wastewater facilities can be constructed/expanded, if necessary, to ensure adequate capacity to serve the proposed development.

Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of utilities. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on wastewater facilities to a less-than-significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to wastewater facilities would not be cumulatively considerable.

Project implementation may result in increased population growth in the Planning Area, and a corresponding increase in the flow of wastewater requiring treatment. As noted above, the Project enables additional development but does not include specific development proposals. At the time future projects are proposed, they would be required to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity exists.

Additionally, LACSD charges annual wastewater sewer fees through its Wastewater Treatment Surcharge Program, as well as sewer connection fees through its Connection Fee Program, in order to maintain and expand wastewater services, including wastewater treatment. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to wastewater would not be cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-48 Utilities and Service Systems Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded stormwater facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Impact Analysis: As discussed, storm drain infrastructure in the Planning Area is owned and operated by the City and the LACFCD. The Planning Area is primarily developed, with limited areas of pervious surfaces.

Similar to the Project, cumulative projects have the potential to slightly increase impervious areas within specific areas of the Planning Area. However, due to the urbanized nature of the Planning Area, the majority of development activities associated with cumulative development would consist of infill and redevelopment on currently urbanized sites and would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff. Federal, State and local regulations would require individual projects to provide necessary on-site storm drain infrastructure and any off-site infrastructure improvements.

The specific impacts of providing new and expanded drainage facilities cannot be determined at this time, as the Project does not propose or approve any specific development project nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public facilities. Stormwater drainage and conveyance facilities would be evaluated at the project-level in association with subsequent development projects. However, the environmental impacts of constructing and operating the facilities would likely be similar to those associated with new development under the proposed Project. As future development and cumulative development projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations. Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of public facilities. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on stormwater facilities to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to stormwater would not be cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded electrical, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? Impact Analysis: As discussed, the City is within the service areas of SCE, SoCalGas, and various telecommunication providers. The Planning Area is primarily developed and includes existing electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. Similar to the Project, cumulative projects have the potential to increase demand for electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services, potentially resulting in the new construction or relocation of facilities. The specific impacts of providing new and Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-49 Utilities and Service Systems expanded electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications services cannot be determined at this time, as the Project does not propose or approve any specific development project nor does it designate specific sites for new or expanded public facilities. The environmental effects of future expansions of electrical, natural gas, and telecommunication facilities would be evaluated with each development proposal and would require a separate environmental review, as required, related to the construction and operation of new electrical, natural gas, and telecommunications infrastructure. Future development associated with the Project and cumulative projects would have to coordinate with each utility provider to establish service, provide any necessary extensions of facilities, and comply with regulations in existence at that time. As future development and cumulative development projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the Municipal Code, and other applicable regulations, including the General Plan Update. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to the provision of utilities. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on natural gas, electrical, and telecommunications facilities to a lessthan significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to electrical, natural gas, or telecommunications would not be cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals, and comply with Federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Impact Analysis: Similar to the Project, cumulative projects have the potential to increase solid waste generated within the Planning Area. As described above, the Lawndale Municipal Code, Chapter 8.28 establishes mandatory solid waste and recycling collection to comply with the requirements of AB 939 and AB 341. As permitted by AB 939, the City authorizes a private solid waste franchisee (i.e., Republic Services) to handle the City’s solid waste and cooperate in the preparation of solid waste disposal characterization studies and the preparation of waste stream audits. Republic and the City work together to submit information to meet the reporting requirements of AB 939, or any other law or regulation, to reach the solid waste and recycling goals mandated by the AB 939. Future development associated with the Project and cumulative projects would be required to implement existing regulations, including the Municipal Code, to comply with regulations related to solid waste and ensure the permitted capacity of landfills serving the City is not exceeded. Further, the General Plan Update includes policies and actions related to solid waste, including source reduction. The polices and actions included within the General Plan Update and compliance with the Zoning Code would reduce the cumulative effect of the General Plan Update on solid waste to a less than significant level. Thus, the Project’s incremental impacts to solid waste would not be cumulatively considerable.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-50 Utilities and Service Systems Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: Less Than Significant Impact.

5.19.7 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Impacts to utilities and service systems associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. No significant unavoidable impacts to utilities and service systems would occur as a result of the General Plan Update.

5.19.8 REFERENCES
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Tons by Facility,
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/DisposalReporting/Destination/DisposalByFacility, accessed March 10, 2023a.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details: Olinda Alpha Landfill (30-AB-0035),
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2757?siteID=2093, accessed March 10, 2023b.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), Sunshine Canyon City/County Landfill (19-AA-2000),
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/259?siteID=4702, accessed March 10, 2023c.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), El Sobrante Landfill (33-AA0217), https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2280?siteID=2402, accessed March 10, 2023d.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (19-AK-0083), https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/Site/Summary/1423, accessed June 19, 2023e.

California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), Jurisdiction Per Capita Disposal Trends, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/AnnualReporting/ReviewReports, accessed March 10, 2023f.

City of Lawndale, Sewer System Management Plan, 2014.

City of Lawndale, Trash & Recycling,
https://www.lawndalecity.org/government/departments/public_works/trash%20&%20recycling , accessed March 10, 2023.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-51 Utilities and Service Systems Golden State Water Company (GSWC), Southwest Service Area 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, July 2021.

Highspeedinternet.com, Internet Providers in 90260,
https://www.highspeedinternet.com/ca/lawndale?zip=90260, accessed March 10, 2023.

Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), Welcome to South Bay, https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/swims/Residents/SOUTH_BAY.aspx, accessed March 10, 2023a.

Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW), Permanent Centers, https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/hhw/Permanent, accessed March 10, 2023b.

Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD), About the District, https://pw.lacounty.gov/LACFCD/web/, accessed March 10, 2023.

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD), Final Clearwater Program Master Facilities Plan, November 2012.

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD), Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (SERRF) Brochure, https://www.lacsd.org/services/solid-waste/facilities/southeast-resource-recovery-facilityserrf/southeast-resource-recovery-facility-serrf-brochure, accessed March 10, 2023.

Southern California Electric (SCE), About Us, https://www.sce.com/about-us, accessed March 9, 2023.

Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), Company Profile, https://www.socalgas.com/aboutus/companyprofile#:~:text=About%20SoCalGas%C2%AE,in%20more%20than%20500%20communities, accessed March 9, 2023.

West Yost Associates, Background Report for Infrastructure Analysis for the City of Lawndale General Plan Update, December 31, 2020.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-52 Utilities and Service Systems This page intentionally left blank.

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
Adjacent Incorporated Area
Unincoporated Los Angeles
County
Golden State Water
Company Pipelines
2-inch - 8-inch
10-inch - 16-inch
Sources: City of Lawndale; Los Angeles County; West Yost.

Date: June 27, 2023.

Figure 5.19-1.

Existing
Water Infrastructure
0 500 1,000
Feet
Dominguez Channel
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-54 Utilities and Service Systems This page intentionally left blank.

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
Adjacent Incorporated Area
Unincoporated Los Angeles
County
LACSD Conveyance
System
District Trunk Sewers
JO A Trunk Line
JO D Trunk Line
Collection Pipes
City of Lawndale
County of Los Angeles
Sources: City of Lawndale; Los Angeles County; West Yost.

Date: June 27, 2023.

Figure 5.19-2.

Existing
Sewer Infrastructure
0 500 1,000
Feet
Dominguez Channel
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-56 Utilities and Service Systems This page intentionally left blank.

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
Adjacent Incorporated Area
Unincoporated Los Angeles
County
LAFCD Conveyance
Infrastructure
Dominguez Channel
LAFCD Collection
Infrastructure
Reinforced Concrete Box
(RCB)
Reinforced Concrete Pipe
(RCP)
Sources: City of Lawndale; Los Angeles County; West Yost.

Date: June 27, 2023.

Figure 5.19-3.

Existing Stormwater and
Flood Control Facilities
0 500 1,000
Feet
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.19-58 Utilities and Service Systems This page intentionally left blank.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-1 Wildfire

5.20 WILDFIRE
This section analyzes potentially significant impacts related to wildfire that could result from implementation of the General Plan Update. Further discussion of fire suppression resources is located in Section 5.15, Public Services, of this EIR.

5.20.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

WILDFIRE HAZARDS
Threat from wildfire hazards is determined based on a number of factors, including fuel loading (vegetation); topography; climatic conditions, such as wind, humidity, and temperature; and the proximity of structures and urban development to fire hazards. Wildland fire hazards are most pronounced in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) areas and areas of development that are located within Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZs). WUI areas typically contain higher amounts of vegetation that can serve as fuel for fires. Generally, the periods of greatest risk for wildland fire are the late summer and early fall when vegetation is at its driest. Human activity, including residential and agricultural burning, campfires, and the use of fireworks can all trigger fires. Natural causes such as lightning strikes may also start fires.

The State has charged the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) with the identification of FHSZ within State Responsibility Areas (SRA). In addition, CAL FIRE must recommend Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) identified within any Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). The FHSZ maps are used by the State Fire Marshall as a basis for the adoption of applicable building code standards and are meant to help limit wildfire damage to structures through planning, prevention, and the application of risk reduction measures. The mapped areas, or “zones,” are based on factors such as fuel (e.g., flammable vegetation), slope, and fire weather. There are three zones, based on increasing fire hazard: moderate, high, and very high.

According to Los Angeles County’s and CAL FIRE’s FHSZ maps, the Planning Area is located within a LRA, and there are no FHSZs in an LRA or SRA within the Planning Area (Los Angeles County 2023; CAL FIRE 2023a).

IDENTIFYING FIRE HAZARDS
Fuel rank is a ranking system developed by CAL FIRE that incorporates four wildfire factors: fuel model, slope, ladder index, and crown index.

The U.S. Forest Service has developed a series of fuel models, which categorize fuels based on burn characteristics. These fuel models help predict fire behavior. In addition to fuel characteristics, slope is an important contributor to fire hazard levels. A surface ranking system has been developed by CAL FIRE, which incorporates the applicable fuel models and slope data. The model categorizes slope into six ranges:
0-10 percent, 11-25 percent, 26-40 percent, 41-55 percent, 56-75 percent, and greater than 75 percent.

The combined fuel model and slope data are organized into three categories, referred to as surface rank.

Thus, surface rank is a reflection of the quantity and burn characteristics of the fuels and the topography in a given area.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-2 Wildfire
The ladder index is a reflection of the distance from the ground to the lowest leafy vegetation for tree and plant species. The crown index is a reflection of the quantity of leafy vegetation present within individual specimens of a given species. The surface rank, ladder index, and crown index for a given area are combined in order to establish a fuel rank of medium, high, or very high. Fuel rank is used by CAL FIRE to identify areas in the California Fire Plan where large, catastrophic fires are most likely.

The fuel rank data is used by CAL FIRE to delineate fire threat based on a system of ordinal ranking. Thus, the Fire Threat model creates discrete regions, which reflect fire probability and predicted fire behavior.

The four classes of fire threat range from moderate to extreme.

HISTORY OF WILDFIRE
Lawndale adopted a Citywide Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in March 2016. As wildfires do not pose a major threat to the City, the LHMP does not include the topics of wildland and urban fires within the Natural Hazard Risk Assessment discussion. However, CAL FIRE records all known fires that occur annually and compiles them into the CAL FIRE Incident Database. The CAL FIRE Incident Database archives date back to 2013, but some of the larger fires have been recorded since the early 2000s. The larger (1,000 acres+) fires that have occurred within an approximately 35-mile radius in and around the Planning Area within the last ten years are shown in Table 5.20-1, History of Fire in Lawndale and Surrounding Area.

Table 5.20-1
History of Fire in Lawndale and Surrounding Area
Year Fire Name, Location, & Description Acres
Burned Containment
2014 Colby Fire; located near Morris Reservoir, north of Glendora. Active for nine days before containment. Approximately 32 miles northeast of Planning Area. 1,952 100%
2016 Sage Fire; off of Calgrove Blvd, southwest of Santa Clarita. Active for seven days. Approximately 35 miles north of Planning Area.
1,100 100%
2016 Marek Fire; incident located at Lake View Terrace. Active for one day before containment. Approximately 28 miles north of Planning Area. 4,824 100%
2017
La Tuna Fire; incident occurred at Lowell Ave and I-210, Verdugo Hills, in the City of Los Angeles. Active from September 1, 2017 to January 9, 2018.

Approximately 22 miles north of Planning Area.
7,194 100%
2017
Creek Fire; located at Kagel Canyon Rd, north of Lake View terrace. Active from December 5, 2017 to August 6, 2018. Approximately 28 miles north of Planning Area.
15,619 100%
2019
Saddle Ridge Fire; located on Saddle Ridge Road, Sylmar. Active for 21 days in October of 2019 before containment. Approximately 30 miles north of Planning Area.
8,799 100%
2020
Ranch 2 Fire; North San Gabriel Canyon Road and Ranch Road, San Gabriel Canyon. Active from August 13 to October 5. Approximately 30 miles northeast of Planning Area.
4,237 100%
2021
Palisades Fire; located at Palisades Court and Michael Lane, Topanga Canyon.

Active for 12 days before containment. Approximately 16 miles northwest of Planning Area.
1,202 100%
Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Incident Data 3/9/23, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents , accessed March 9, 2023b.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-3 Wildfire

WILDFIRE PREPAREDNESS & PROGRAMS
Due to the urbanized character of the City, fires would primarily be associated with structures, trash/debris, and vehicle fires. Structure fires, including homes, industrial and commercial buildings, and other facilities are of the greatest concern due to the potential for loss of life as well as property.

Generally, the risk of injury and damage is greater for higher occupancy structures, such as condominiums, apartment buildings, hotels, and churches. In addition, higher density areas are of increased concern due to the large number of people residing within a concentrated area and the potential for fires to spread from one structure to another. Lawndale is among the highest density areas within Los Angeles County.

Development of the City has resulted in small lot development with multiple structures on single lots and narrow streets. As discussed above, the Planning Area, does not contain VHFHSZs within SRAs and LRAs.

The City of Lawndale contracts with the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD) for fire and emergency services. The LACoFD contracts with CAL FIRE for provision of services as part of an integrated fire protection system. There is one fire station within City limits: Fire Station 21, located at 4312 West 147th Street.

LACoFD’s areas of expertise include: Firefighting; Emergency Medical Services; Urban Search and Rescue, and Hazardous Materials; Air and Wildland; Lifeguarding; Dispatch; Prevention; and Public Education. The Air and Wildland Department maintains a fleet of ten helicopters for paramedic transport, hoist rescues and wildland firefighting. Contract aircraft are also available during wildfire season. Nine camps are also staffed year-round for fire suppression, fire road maintenance and miscellaneous projects. The Prevention Department educates the community about the benefits of proper safety practices and identifies and eliminates all types of hazardous conditions that pose a threat to life, the environment and property (Los Angeles County Fire Department 2023).

The LACoFD Strategic Plan 2017- 2021 outlines goals and strategies for fire protection services throughout the Los Angeles County Operational Area, including facility needs and improvements, training requirements, and disaster preparedness.

Further, LACoFD supports the “Ready Set, Go!” (RSG) CAL FIRE State program. This program is a preparedness campaign that gives Los Angeles County residents tips on how to be prepared for wildfires (and floods) year-round. It is an easy-to-understand guide for how to make a home resistant to wildfires as well as preparing families to leave early and safely. The publication was prepared by the International Association of Fire Chief’s RSG Program and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, U.S.

Department of the Interior, and the U.S. Fire Administration.

5.20.2 REGULATORY SETTING

FEDERAL
FY 2001 Appropriations Act
Title IV of the Appropriations Act required the identification of “Urban Wildland Interface Communities in the Vicinity of Federal Lands that are at High Risk from Wildfire” by the U.S. Departments of the Interior and Agriculture.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-4 Wildfire
Disaster Mitigation Act
The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires that a state mitigation plan, as a condition of disaster assistance, add incentives for increased coordination and integration of mitigation activities at the state level through the establishment of requirements for two different levels of state plans: “Standard” and “Enhanced.” The Disaster Mitigation Act also established a new requirement for local mitigation plans.

National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy
Under the direction of the Federal Land Assistance, Management, and Enhancement Act of 2009 (the FLAME Act), the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture created the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy report. This report contains a cohesive wildfire management strategy as directed by the FLAME Act and under the advisement of the intergovernmental Wildland Fire Leadership Council. The most recent version of this report is The National Strategy: The Final Phase in the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy (2014).

National Fire Plan (NFP) 2000
The summer of 2000 marked a historic milestone in wildland fire records for the United States. Dry conditions (across the western United States), led to destructive wildfire events on an estimated 7.2 million acres, nearly double the 10-year average. Costs in damages, including fire suppression activities, were approximately 2.1 billion dollars. Congressional direction called for substantial new appropriations for wildland fire management. This resulted in action plans, interagency strategies, and the Western Governor’s Association’s “A Collaborative Approach for Reducing Wildland Fire Risks to Communities and the Environment - A 10-Year Comprehensive Strategy - Implementation Plan”, which collectively became known as the National Fire Plan. This plan places a priority on collaborative work within communities to reduce their risk from large-scale wildfires.

Healthy Forest Initiative 2002/Healthy Forest Restoration Act 2003 In August 2002, the Healthy Forests Initiative was launched with the intent to reduce the severe wildfires risks that threaten people, communities, and the environment. Congress then passed the Healthy Forests Restoration Act on December 3, 2003 to provide the additional administrative tools needed to implement the Healthy Forests Initiative. The Healthy Forests Restoration Act strengthened efforts to restore healthy forest conditions near communities by authorizing measures such as expedited environmental assessments for hazardous fuels projects on Federal land. This Act emphasized the need for Federal agencies to work collaboratively with communities in developing hazardous fuel reduction projects and places priority on fuel treatments identified by communities themselves in their Community Wildfire Protection Plans.

Department of the Interior Department Manual Part 620
Wildland Fire Management Part 620 of the Department of the Interior Departmental Manual pertains to wildland fire management policies, with the goal of providing an integrated approach to wildland fire management. The guiding principles of the plan emphasize the need for public health and safety considerations, risk management protocols, inter-agency collaboration, and economic feasibility of wildfire management practices, as well as the ecological role of wildfires.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-5 Wildfire
STATE
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Under Title 14 of the Natural Resources of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), CAL FIRE has the primary responsibility for implementing wildfire planning and protection for SRA lands. CAL FIRE develops fire safe regulations and issues fire safe clearances for land within the SRA. The CAL FIRE Resource Management Program manages more than 31 million acres of California’s privately-owned wildlands, and provides emergency services in 36 of the State’s 58 counties via contracts with local governments.

Under CCR Title 24, Regulations Development, the Office of the State Fire Marshal is responsible for promulgating regulations that promote fire and life safety for inclusion into the State Building Codes, including the California Building Code, California Fire Code, California Electrical Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, and California Historical Building Code. The process incorporates a great deal of public participation and is guided by the State Building Standards Law.

Strategic Fire Plan for California
The State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, along with CAL FIRE, updated the previous 2010 Strategic Fire Plan to reflect current and anticipated needs by incorporating and updating goals and objectives to reflect new priorities and changed conditions. The 2018 Strategic Fire Plan focuses on 1) fire prevention and suppression activities to protect lives, property, and ecosystem services, and 2) natural resource management to maintain the state’s forests as a carbon sink to meet California’s climate change goals and to serve as important habitat for adaptation and mitigation. It serves as guidance for CAL FIRE and stakeholders who share similar missions and responsibilities towards public safety and fire suppression.

California Fire Code
The 2022 California Fire Code (CCR Title 24, Part 9) establishes regulations to safeguard against the hazards of fire, explosion, or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures, and premises.

The Fire Code also establishes requirements intended to provide safety for and assistance to firefighters and emergency responders during emergency operations. The provisions of the Fire Code apply to the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal, and demolition of every building or structure throughout California. The Fire Code includes regulations regarding fire-resistance-rated construction, fire protection systems such as alarm and sprinkler systems, fire services features such as fire apparatus access roads, means of egress, fire safety during construction and demolition, and WUI areas.

California State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan
The purpose of the State Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (SHMP) is to significantly reduce deaths, injuries, and other losses attributed to natural- and human-caused hazards in California. The SHMP provides guidance for hazard mitigation activities emphasizing partnerships among local, State, and Federal agencies as well as the private sector.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-6 Wildfire
California Government Code
California Government Code Section 65302.5 requires the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection to provide recommendations to a local jurisdiction’s General Plan fire safety element at the time that the General Plan is amended. While not a direct and binding fire prevention requirement for individuals, General Plans that adopt the Board’s recommendations will include goals and policies that provide for contemporary fire prevention standards for the jurisdiction.

California Government Code Section 51175 defines Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones and designates lands considered by the State to be a very high fire hazard.

California Government Code Section 51182 specifically requires people who own, lease, control, operate, or maintain a building or structure on or adjoining land within a VHFHSZ, to do all of the following: (A) Maintain defensible space of 100 feet from each side and from the front and rear of the structure, (B) Remove that portion of a tree that extends within 10 feet of the outlet of a chimney or stovepipe, (C) Maintain a tree, shrub, or other plant adjacent to or overhanging a building free of dead or dying wood, (D) Maintain the roof of a structure free of leaves, needles, or other vegetative materials, and (E) Prior to constructing a new dwelling or structure that will be occupied or rebuilding an occupied dwelling or occupied structure damaged by a fire in that zone, the construction or rebuilding of which requires a building permit, the owner shall obtain a certification from the local building official that the dwelling or structure, as proposed to be built, complies with all applicable state and local building standards.

California Government Code Section 51189 directs the Office of the State Fire Marshal to create building standards for wildland fire resistance. The code includes measures that increase the likelihood of a structure withstanding intrusion by fire (such as building design and construction requirements that use fire-resistant building materials) and provides protection of structure projections (such as porches, decks, balconies and eaves), and structure openings (such as attics, eave vents, and windows).

California Public Resources Code
The State’s Fire Safe Regulations are set forth in Public Resources Code Section 4290, which include the establishment of SRAs.

Public Resources Code Section 4291 sets forth defensible space requirements, which are applicable to anyone that owns, leases, controls, operates, or maintains a building or structure in, upon, or adjoining a mountainous area, forest-covered lands, brush covered lands, grass-covered lands, or land that is covered with flammable material (Section 4291(a)).

Public Resources Code Sections 4292-4296 and 14 CCR 1256, Fire Prevention for Electrical Utilities, address the vegetation clearance standards for electrical utilities. They include the standards for clearing around energy lines and conductors such as power-line hardware and power poles. These regulations are critical to wildland fire safety because of the substantial number of power lines in wildlands, the historic source of fire ignitions associated with power lines, and the extensive damage that results from power line caused wildfires in severe wind conditions.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-7 Wildfire
Assembly Bill 337
Per AB 337, local fire prevention authorities and CAL FIRE are required to identify VHFHSZs in LRAs.

Standards related to brush clearance and the use of fire-resistant materials in fire hazard severity zones are also established.

California Code of Regulations Title 8
In accordance with CCR Title 8, Sections 1270 and 6773 (Fire Prevention and Fire Protection and Fire Equipment), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (Cal OSHA) establishes fire suppression service standards. The standards range from fire hose size requirements to the design of emergency access roads.

California Code of Regulations Title 14 (Natural Resources) Division 1.5 (Department of Forestry and Fire Protection), Title 14 of the CCR establishes a variety of wildfire preparedness, prevention, and response regulations.

California Code of Regulations Title 19 (Public Safety) Title 19 of the CCR establishes a variety of emergency fire response, fire prevention, and construction and construction materials standards.

California Code of Regulations Title 24 (California Building Code) The California Building Code (CBC) contains general building design and construction requirements relating to fire and life safety, structural safety, and access compliance. CBC provisions provide minimum standards to safeguard life or limb, health, property, and public welfare by regulating and controlling the design, construction, quality of materials, use and occupancy, location, and maintenance of all buildings and structures and certain equipment.

California Health and Safety Code and Uniform Building Code Section 13000 et seq.

State fire regulations are set forth in Section 13000 et seq. of the California Health and Safety Code, which is divided into “Fires and Fire Protection” and “Buildings Used by the Public.” The regulations provide for the enforcement of the UBC and mandate the abatement of fire hazards.

The code establishes broadly applicable regulations, such as standards for buildings and fire protection devices, in addition to regulations for specific land uses, such as childcare facilities and high-rise structures.

California Senate Bill 1241
California Senate Bill 1241 requires that the Safety Element component of city or county general plans to incorporate fire risk related to SRAs and VHFSZ.

LOCAL
Los Angeles County Operational Area Emergency Response Plan The purpose of the Los Angeles County Operational Area Emergency Response Plan (OAERP) is to increase cooperation and coordination between relevant governmental agencies and jurisdictions in order to Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-8 Wildfire
increase efficiency and minimize losses in the event of an emergency or disaster. The OAERP established the Operational Area (OA) emergency organization, identifies departmental responsibilities, and specifies policies and general procedures for addressing emergencies impacting the OA. This Plan provides for the coordination of emergency operations plans of agencies and jurisdictions. The OAERP conforms to the requirements of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the California Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS).

County of Los Angeles All-Hazards Mitigation Plan
The 2020 All-Hazards Mitigation Plan (AHMP) assess risks posed by natural hazards and to develop a mitigation action plan for reducing the risks in Los Angeles County. The primary focus of the 2020 AHMP is preparation for natural hazards and secondary hazards, that follow as a result of a natural hazard. In addition, potential climate change impacts are addressed in the plan as increasing surface temperatures will likely result in more droughts and subsequently the risk of wildfires. Therefore, climate change, dam failure, drought, earthquake, flood, landslide, tsunami, and wildfire are the main focuses in the 2020 AHMP. The County developed the 2020 AHMP to cover mitigation responsibilities of County departments (including LACoFD). It helps ensure the most effective allocation of resources for the maximum benefit and protection of the public in time of emergency.

City of Lawndale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 2016
The City of Lawndale developed the 2016 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in an effort to reduce future loss of life and property resulting from natural disasters and to provide increased resiliency for the City, allowing Lawndale to return to “the norm” sooner, with fewer impacts to people and infrastructure. The purpose of the Lawndale LHMP is to provide the City with a blueprint for hazard mitigation action planning. The plan identifies resources, information, and strategies for risk reduction, and provides a tool to measure the success of mitigation implementation on a continual basis.

City of Lawndale Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
The City adopted the EOP in 2011, which was updated in 2015. The EOP addresses the City’s planned response to natural or human-caused disasters, provides an overview of operational concepts, and identifies components of the City’s emergency/disaster management organization within the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS), the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the Incident Command System (ICS). The EOP also describes the organizational structures, roles, responsibilities, policies and protocols for providing emergency support.

City of Lawndale Municipal Code
Chapter 2.44, Disaster Council, provides for the preparation and carrying out of plans for the protection of people and property within the City in the event of an emergency; the direction of the emergency organization; and the coordination of the emergency functions of the City with all other public agencies, corporations, organizations and affected private persons. The intent of this Chapter is to develop emergency and mutual-aid plans and agreements.

Municipal Code Title 13, Public Services, addresses wastewater and storm drains within the City. Chapter

13.12, Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control, establishes stormwater runoff controls and best management practices (BMPs) to prevent and/or reduce the quantity of pollutants from being discharged Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-9 Wildfire
into the municipal stormwater system (MS4). Section 13.12.060, Best Management Practices Required, requires the implementation of BMPs during project operation. Section 13.12.070, Construction Activity Stormwater Measures, requires applicants for grading or building permits within the City to provide satisfactory proof of compliance with the Construction General Permit, including a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), when applicable. Applicants that are not required to comply with the Construction General Permit are required to implement a grading and construction activity runoff control program. Chapter 3.16, Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan and Low Impact Development Implementation, contains a number of requirements to control stormwater pollution. Subject new development and redevelopment projects are required to comply with standard urban stormwater mitigation program (SUSMP) conditions assigned by the City, consisting of low impact development (LID) structural and non-structural BMPs, source control BMPs; and structural and non-structural BMPs for specific types of uses. Section 13.16.070, Control of Erosion of Slopes and Channels, requires BMPs to be used on slopes or channels in subject new development or redevelopment projects. Per Section

13.16.110, Maintenance of Best Management Practices, applicants for new subject development and redevelopment projects must agree to maintain any structural or treatment control BMPs.

Municipal Code Chapter 15.20, Fire Code, adopts and incorporates the California Fire Code, as amended by Title 32 the Los Angeles County Fire Code, as the City’s fire code prescribing regulations governing the creation and maintenance of conditions dangerous to life and property due to hazards of fire and explosions. The Fire Code sets fire safety related building standards and practices to safeguard life and property.

Section 17.36.220, Temporary Storage of Construction Materials, and Section 17.36.230, Temporary Storage- City Construction Materials and Other Public Agency Construction Materials, regulate construction materials and equipment. Particularly, Section 17.36.220 requires construction activities to keep adjacent sidewalks, public streets, and, alleys, to be kept free of trash, dirt, debris, or other material for the duration of the construction, as well as sixty days following substantial completion of such construction. Section 17.36.230 allows property in any zone to be used for the storage of materials, equipment and/or for a contractor’s temporary office for any city construction project and/or other public agency construction projects.

5.20.3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA AND THRESHOLDS
Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines contains the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, which includes questions related to wildfire. The issues presented in the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, which have been utilized as thresholds of significance in this section.

Accordingly, a project may create a significant environmental impact if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, and if it would:
• Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan (refer to Impact Statement WF-1);
• Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire (refer to Impact Statement WF-2);
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-10 Wildfire
• Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment (refer to Impact Statement WF-3); and/or
• Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes (refer to Impact Statement WF-4).

5.20.4 IMPACT ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
WF-1: Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Impact Analysis: According to the CAL FIRE and County FHSZ Maps, the Planning Area is not located within an SRA or within a VHFHSZ within a LRA (CAL FIRE 2023a; Los Angeles County 2015). Therefore, although the General Plan Update would allow for a variety of new development within the Planning Area, no future development within the Planning Area would be located within a FHSZ in SRA or LRA. Any future development would be required to comply with all City and LACoFD requirements for fire prevention and safety measures, including site access. Additionally, implementation of the General Plan Update would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. As described in Section 5.15, Public Services, LACoFD provides fire and emergency response service to the City of Lawndale. The County OAERP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents, including wildfires, and outlines mutual aid provisions within the Los Angeles County OA. The City’s EOP addresses the City’s planned response to natural or human-caused disasters and describes the organizational structures, roles, responsibilities, policies and protocols for providing emergency support. The EOP does not provide a specific evacuation route map, as evacuation measures would be implemented based on the specific emergency and area affected. The General Plan Update would not require or result in revisions to the adopted OAERP or EOP.

While the Project does not propose site-specific development, infrastructure improvements would occur gradually to accommodate the new growth as further discussed in Section 5.17, Transportation. Future development would be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with applicable standards, including vehicular access to ensure that adequate emergency access and evacuation would be maintained. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 15.20, Fire Code, construction activities that may temporarily restrict fire apparatus access would be required to implement appropriate measures to facilitate the passage of fire apparatus and emergency vehicles through/around any effected roadways, as part of the building permit process. The General Plan Update identifies major arterials as the primary routes for evacuation; however, evacuation routes would depend upon the emergency event and area affected. Law enforcement will identify the appropriate routes and assist residents leaving the City in the event an evacuation of all or part of the City is required.

Future development within the Planning Area is not anticipated to result in the substantial modification of roadways surrounding specific development sites or the placement of any permanent physical barriers on adjacent roadways. There is the potential that traffic lanes located immediately adjacent to a Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-11 Wildfire
development site may be temporarily closed or controlled by construction personnel during construction activities. However, any temporary construction activity would adhere to Municipal Code Section

17.36.220, Temporary Storage of Construction Materials, which requires sidewalks, public streets, and, alleys adjacent to construction sites to be kept free of debris or other materials that could interfere with circulation for the duration of construction activities, as well as sixty days following substantial completion of such construction. Thus, the Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address public safety and emergency evacuation.

Proposed Public Safety Element Goal PS-1, and subsequent policies and actions, pertains to emergency operations. Policy PS-1.3 implements emergency preparedness and response measures in coordination with the County including periodic trainings with staff and/or participation in County trainings on emergency operations procedures and responses. Policy PS-1.4 requires the Lawndale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to be regularly maintained and updated. Policy PS-1.6 seeks opportunities to improve emergency access and circulation throughout the community. Action PS-1a reviews County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures. Action PS-1b continues to implement and update (when relevant) the City’s EOP. Policy PS-4.2 continues involvement of the LACoFD in the development review process to ensure fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments. Policy PS-4.3 ensures all new development provides adequate access for emergency vehicles and evacuation. With adherence to Municipal Code regulations and General Plan Update policies, implementation of the Project would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and no impact would occur.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Emergency Operations. A community prepared to provide effective response and recovery efforts in the event of an emergency.

Policy PS-1.2: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to promote the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.

Policy PS-1.3: Emergency Preparedness and Response. Continue to implement emergency preparedness and response measures in coordination with Los Angeles County including periodic trainings with staff and/or participation in County trainings on emergency operations procedures and responses.

Policy PS-1.4: Local Hazard Mitigation. Regularly maintain and update natural and man-made hazard information relevant to the Lawndale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Policy PS-1.6: Emergency Access. Investigate and seek out opportunities to improve emergency access and circulation throughout the community.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-12 Wildfire
Action PS-1a: Regularly review County and State emergency response procedures that must be coordinated with City procedures.

Action PS-1b: Continue to implement and update (when relevant) the City’s Emergency Operations Plan.

Policy PS-4.2: Development Review. Involve LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments.

Policy PS-4.3: Emergency Access. Require all new developments provide adequate access for emergency vehicles and evacuation as part of the development review process.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

WF-2: Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Impact Analysis: The Planning Area does not contain lands classified as FHSZs, nor is the Planning Area located within an SRA. The Planning Area is predominantly flat, built-out, and surrounded by highly urbanized development. Urbanized land does not typically facilitate the spread of wildfire in the same manner as vegetated, open space areas.

The Project would allow for a variety of new development within the Planning Area, but does not propose any site-specific development. Implementation of the General Plan Update would not substantially alter the slope, prevailing winds, or other factors that would increase exposure Lawndale residents, employees or visitors to increased pollutant concentrations from wildfire or result in the uncontrollable spread of a wildfire. Future development is not anticipated to exacerbate wildfire risks. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address public safety and emergency services, including fire protection services. Proposed Public Safety Element Policy PS-4.1 coordinates fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services. Policy PS-4.2 involves LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments. Policy PS-4.4 requires that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and Federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes, as well as other applicable fire safety standards. Action PS4a requires all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City. Therefore, with implementation of the applicable General Plan Update goals, policies and actions, and compliance with fire codes, no impact would occur.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-13 Wildfire
Policy PS-1.4: Local Hazard Mitigation. Regularly maintain and update natural and man-made hazard information relevant to the Lawndale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Policy PS-1.6: Emergency Access. Investigate and seek out opportunities to improve emergency access and circulation throughout the community.

Goal PS-4: Fire Hazards. A community protected from loss of life or injury and damage to property due to fire hazards.

Policy PS-4.1: Fire Protection Services. Coordinate fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services.

Policy PS-4.2: Development Review. Involve LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments.

Policy PS-4.4: Building Fire Codes. Require that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and Federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes, as well as other applicable fire safety standards.

Action PS-4a: Require all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City.

Action PS-4b: Work with LACoFD to disseminate educational programs for residents on fire hazard risks and fire safety measures.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

WF-3: Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? Impact Analysis: The City is highly urbanized and existing infrastructure generally exists within the Planning Area. While no site-specific development is currently proposed, future development anticipated by the General Plan Update could require the eventual construction and installation of new infrastructure or maintenance of existing infrastructure, including roads, water and sewer, and power lines to serve increased growth and development. The Planning Area does not contain lands classified as FHSZs, nor is the Planning Area located within an SRA.

The General Plan Update includes provisions for emergency access, fire protection services, and fire safe design site standards. Proposed Public Safety Element Policy PS-1.2 directs coordination with service providers to promote the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery. Policy PS-4.1 coordinates fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services. Policy PS-4.2 Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-14 Wildfire
involves LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments. Policy PS-4.4 requires that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and Federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes, as well as other applicable fire safety standards.

Future development of utility infrastructure would be subject to the requirements established in Public Resources Code Section 4292, which requires clearing of flammable fuels for a minimum 10-foot radius from the outer circumference of poles and towers; and Section 4293, which sets basic requirements for clearances around electrical conductors. Furthermore, future development would be required to meet vegetation clearance requirements outlined in Title 14, Section 1104.1(d) of the California Code of Regulations for single overhead facilities.

Maintenance of existing infrastructure and the potential installation of new infrastructure for future projects in the Planning Area would be required to comply with Fire Code requirements found in the Municipal Code (Chapter 15.20, Fire Code). Proposed development would be reviewed by the LACoFD to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with the Fire Code. The potential for future projects to impact environmental resources to meet compliance with fire development standards such (as fuel breaks and clearance requirements) would require site specific environmental evaluation under CEQA to identify any site-specific impacts. In addition, any development in the City would need to comply with the California Building Code, Public Resource Code, and the City Municipal Code to ensure that new developments have access to necessary utilities, and any additional utility construction complies with all code requirements.

As demonstrated throughout this EIR, implementation of the various policies and actions contained in the General Plan Update would reduce potential impacts associated with the construction and expansion of infrastructure. Implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions, combined with local and State requirements, would ensure that potential wildland fire hazards would not be exacerbated by the installation or maintenance of local infrastructure, and no impact would occur.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Policy PS-1.2 Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to promote the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.

Policy PS-1.4: Local Hazard Mitigation. Regularly maintain and update natural and man-made hazard information relevant to the Lawndale Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Policy PS-1.5: Resources. Support policies and programs that facilitate the availability of adequate resources to respond to health, fire, and police emergencies.

Goal 4: Fire Hazards. A community protected from loss of life or injury and damage to property due to fire hazards.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-15 Wildfire
Policy PS-4.1: Fire Protection Services. Coordinate fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services.

Policy PS-4.2: Development Review. Involve LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments.

Policy PS-4.4 Building Fire Codes. Require that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and Federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes, as well as other applicable fire safety standards.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

WF-4: Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
Impact Analysis: Wildfire can alter the hydrologic response of a watershed to the extent that even modest rainstorms can produce dangerous flash floods and debris flows (United States Geological Survey 2021).

A number of factors affect the likelihood of downstream flooding or landslide after a fire including basin morphometry, burn severity, soil properties, and rainfall characteristics.

The General Plan Update would allow development and improvement projects that would involve some land clearing, grading, and other ground-disturbing activities that could temporarily increase soil erosion rates during and shortly after project construction. There are no designated FHSZs within the Planning Area. Additionally, the Planning Area is predominantly flat, built-out, and surrounded by highly urbanized development.

As detailed throughout Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, there are no mapped flood hazard zones located within the Planning Area; the entire Planning Area islocated within an area of minimal flood hazard. Future development resulting from implementation of the General Plan Update could increase the potential for localized flooding in low spots or where infrastructure is unable to accommodate peak flows during a storm event. However, as discussed in Section 5.10, all future development and redevelopment projects would be required to comply with applicable Federal, State, regional, and local plans, policies, and regulations to address site-specific drainage and potential flooding risks. Specifically, future site-specific development would be required to comply with Municipal Code Chapter 13.12, Storm Water and Urban Runoff Pollution Control, and 13.16, Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan and Low Impact Development Implementation. Municipal Code Chapter 13.12 establishes required BMPs during operational phase of projects. Municipal Code Chapter 13.12 also indicates that each person applying to the City for a grading or building permit must submit satisfactory proof to the City that a SWPPP has been prepared, before the City issues any grading or building permit on the construction project. Municipal Code Chapter 13.16 requires subject new development and redevelopment projects to comply with SUSMP conditions assigned by the City, consisting of LID structural and non-structural BMPs; source control BMPs; and structural and non-structural BMPs for specific types of uses. Section 13.16.060, Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-16 Wildfire
Stormwater Pollution Control and Design Standards for Best Management Practices (BMPs), requires applicable development and redevelopment projects to submit a SUSMP for City review and approval, which is required to be incorporated into the applicant’s project plans. Section 13.16.070, Control of Erosion of Slopes and Channels, requires BMPs to be used on slopes or channels in subject new development or redevelopment projects. Per Section 13.16.110, Maintenance of Best Management Practices, applicants for new subject development and redevelopment projects must agree to maintain any structural or treatment control BMPs. These regulations would minimize danger to life and property due to the hazards of flood, soil erosion, seepage and destruction of natural topography and plant material. Further, subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA. Construction of storm drainage improvements would occur as part of an overall development or infrastructure project, and would be considered in the environmental review associated with the specific project being proposed (refer to Section 5.10 for additional details).

The General Plan Update includes policies and actions to address public safety, which would limit risks to people and structures within the City. Proposed Public Safety Element Policy PS-1.2 directs coordination with service providers to promote the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery. Policy PS-4.1 coordinates fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services.

Policy PS-4.2 involves LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments. Policy PS-4.4 requires that all buildings and facilities within the City comply with local, State, and Federal regulatory standards such as the California Building and Fire Codes, as well as other applicable fire safety standards. Policy PS-5.3 adheresto the latest building, site, and design codes to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards in the community. Policy PS-5.4 encourages new developments that add substantial amounts of impervious surfaces to integrate LID BMPs to reduce stormwater runoff. Compliance with local, State, and Federal regulations, and General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions would reduce potential exposure of people or structures to significant risks resulting from runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. No impact would occur in this regard.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions:

PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goal PS-1: Emergency Operations. A community prepared to provide effective response and recovery efforts in the event of an emergency.

Policy PS-1.2: Critical Facilities. Coordinate with service providers to ensure the resilience of critical facilities, lifeline services, and infrastructure, and plan for the use of critical facilities during post-disaster response and recovery.

Goal 4: Fire Hazards. A community protected from loss of life or injury and damage to property due to fire hazards.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-17 Wildfire
Policy PS-4.1: Fire Protection Services. Coordinate fire protection services with LACoFD so that sufficient capacity, stations, personnel, and equipment are available to meet needs in Lawndale for fire protection and related emergency services.

Policy PS-4.2: Development Review. Involve LACoFD in the development review process so that fire safety is addressed in new and modified developments.

Action PS-4a: Require all new habitable structures be designed in accordance with the most recent California Building and Fire Code with local amendments adopted by the City.

Goal PS-5: Flood Hazards. A community that is protected from flood hazards.

Policy PS-5.3 Site Design. Adhere to the latest building, site, and design codes to avoid or minimize the risk of flooding hazards in the community.

Policy PS-5.4 Best Management Practices. Encourage new developments that add substantial amounts of impervious surfaces to integrate low impact development Best Management Practices to reduce stormwater runoff.

Policy PS-5.6: Local Storm Drainage Infrastructure. Maintain and regularly assess the status of local storm drainage infrastructure to confirm that the system is functioning property.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

5.20.5 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
Section 4.0, Basis of Cumulative Analysis, identifies projected growth within the Planning Area and County with the potential to interact with the proposed Project to the extent that a significant cumulative effect relative to wildfire may occur. The cumulative projects’ setting for wildfire considers the region and projects within the City.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Impact Analysis: The Planning Area and immediately surrounding area is highly urbanized and not located within an SRA or FHSZ per CAL FIRE and County regulatory maps. Therefore, future development associated with implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would not be developed in an SRA or FHSZ. Additionally, future development associated with implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The County OAERP addresses the planned response to extraordinary situations associated with natural disasters and/or human caused incidents, including wildfires, and outlines mutual aid provisions within the Los Angeles County OA. The City’s EOP addresses the City’s planned response to natural or human-caused disasters and describes the organizational structures, roles, responsibilities, policies and protocols for providing emergency support. Future development associated with implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would be subject to similar fire protection Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-18 Wildfire
development standards and would be required to comply with each jurisdiction’s established regulatory framework, including the respective municipal code and General Plan policies and programs to assist in protecting life and property in the event of a wildfire. The Project’s would not contribute to cumulative wildfire hazard impacts. Thus, the Project and cumulative development projects’ incremental effects involving an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? Impact Analysis: The Planning Area and immediately surrounding area is highly urbanized and not located within an SRA or FHSZ per CAL FIRE and County regulatory maps. Therefore, future development associated with implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would not be developed in an SRA or FHSZ. Urbanized land does not typically facilitate the spread of wildfire in the same manner as vegetated, open space areas. Future development and cumulative development would be required to comply with the Fire Code, which would further minimize and reduce impacts related to wildfire.

Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies and programs to address public safety and emergency services. As part of the City’s development review process, the LACoFD would review all projects for related fire hazards. Wildfire risks would not change with adoption of the General Plan Update, and exposure to pollutant concentrations from wildfire for occupants in the Planning Area would not significantly increase. Accordingly, the Project’s incremental contribution to wildfire risks exposing project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
Impact Analysis: The Planning Area and immediately surrounding area is highly urbanized and not located within an SRA or FHSZ per CAL FIRE regulatory maps. Therefore, future development associated with Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-19 Wildfire
implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would not be developed in an SRA or FHSZ. Future development and cumulative development could require the eventual construction and installation of new infrastructure or maintenance of existing infrastructure, including roads, water and sewer, and power lines to serve increased growth and development. Maintenance of existing infrastructure and the potential installation of new infrastructure for future development and cumulative development would be required to comply with Fire Code requirements and would be reviewed by the LACoFD to determine the specific fire requirements applicable to ensure compliance with the Fire Code. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies and programs to address public safety and emergency services.

Thus, the Project’s incremental contribution involving potential wildland fire hazards due to the installation or maintenance of local infrastructure would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance: No Impact.

Would the project, combined with other related cumulative projects, expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Impact Analysis: Future development associated with implementation of the Project and cumulative projects would be subject to similar fire protection development standards and would be required to comply with each jurisdictions established regulatory framework, including the respective municipal code and General Plan policies and programs to assist in protecting life and property in the event of a fire. The Project’s incremental contribution to cumulative wildfire hazard impacts would not be significant. As previously discussed, the City is highly urbanized and future development and redevelopment activities in the City under would occur in areas that have been previously developed. As a result, the degree of wildland fire hazard, including secondary hazards such as post-fire flooding and landslides, would not substantially change with adoption of the General Plan Update, and current hazards would not significantly increase.

As described previously, there are no SRA or FHSZs mapped within the Planning Area. As such, the General Plan Update does not approve, propose, or authorize development in an SRA or FHSZ per CAL FIRE and County regulatory maps. New development would be required to comply with the Fire Code, which would further minimize and reduce impacts related to potential fires within the City. As part of the City’s development review process, the LACoFD would review all projects for fire related hazards. Additionally, the General Plan Update includes policies and programs to address public safety and emergency services.

Accordingly, the Project’s incremental contribution involving significant risks as a result of runoff, postfire slope instability, or drainage changes would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions: Refer to the General Plan goals, policies, and actions cited above.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 5.20-20 Wildfire
Level of Significance: No Impact.

5.20.6 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
Wildfire impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would have no impact; no significant unavoidable wildfire impacts would occur as a result of the General Plan Update.

5.20.7 REFERENCES
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), FHSZ Viewer, https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/, accessed March 7, 2023a.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Incident Data 3/9/23, https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents , accessed March 9, 2023b.

Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), About Us, https://fire.lacounty.gov/about-us-2/, accessed March 9, 2023.

Los Angeles County, Fire Hazard Severity Zone Web App,
https://lacounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=d2ea45d15c784adfa601e 84b38060c4e, accessed March 7, 2023.

Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County 2035 General Plan, October 2015.

United States Geological Survey (USGS), Emergency Assessment of Post-Fire Debris-Flow Hazards, 2021 https://landslides.usgs.gov/hazards/postfire_debrisflow/, accessed June 8, 2023.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-1 Other CEQA Considerations

6.0 OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS

6.1 LONG-TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2, Consideration and Discussion of Significant Environmental Effects, an EIR is required to consider: (a) The Significant Environmental Effects of the proposed Project; (b) Energy Impacts; (c) Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided if the Proposed Project is Implemented; (d) Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would be Caused by the Proposed Project Should it be Implemented; and (e) Growth-Inducing Impact of the Proposed Project.

In response to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162.2 (a), Significant Environmental Effects of the Proposed Project and Section 15162 (c), Significant Environmental Effects Which Cannot be Avoided if the Proposed Project is Implemented, are considered and identified in Section 5.0, Environmental Analysis, of this EIR.

Energy Impacts, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.2 (b), are analyzed in Section 5.6, Energy.

6.2 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES
According to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126(c) and 15126.2(d), an EIR is required to address any significant irreversible environmental changes that would occur should the proposed project be implemented. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(d):
“Uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project may be irreversible since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or nonuse thereafter unlikely. Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts (such as highway improvement which provides access to a previously inaccessible area) generally commit future generations to similar uses. Also irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents associated with the project. Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified.”
Determining whether the proposed Project would result in significant irreversible effects requires a determination of whether key resources would be degraded or destroyed such that there would be little possibility of restoring them. Irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified.

CONSUMPTION OF NONRENEWABLE RESOURCES
The environmental impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update are analyzed in Section 5.0. Future development would consume limited, slowly renewable and non-renewable resources. This consumption would occur during each individual project’s construction phase and would continue throughout its operational lifetime.

Construction associated with future development would require a commitment of resources that would include: (1) building materials; (2) fuel and operational materials/resources; and (3) the transportation of goods and persons to and from individual development sites. Construction would require the consumption of resources that are not renewable or which may renew so slowly as to be considered non- Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-2 Other CEQA Considerations renewable. These resources would include the following construction supplies: lumber and other forest products; aggregate materials used in concrete and asphalt; metals; and water. Fossil fuels such as gasoline and oil would also be consumed to power construction vehicles and equipment.

The operational activities of new development accommodated through implementation of the General Plan Update would consume resources which would be similar to those currently consumed within the City (i.e., energy resources such as electricity and natural gas, petroleum-based fuels required for vehicletrips, fossil fuels, and water). Fossil fuels would represent the primary energy source associated with both construction and ongoing operation, and the existing, finite supplies of these natural resources would be incrementally reduced. Future development operations would occur in accordance with California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6, which sets forth conservation practices that would limit energy consumption. Nonetheless, the proposed Project’s energy requirements would represent a long-term commitment of essentially non-renewable resources.

Construction activities associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could release hazardous materials into the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions; refer to Section 5.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. All potential demolition, grading, and excavation activities would be subject to the established regulatory framework to ensure that hazardous materials are not released into the environment. Compliance with the established regulatory framework and mitigation measures would protect against a significant and irreversible environmental change resulting from the accidental release of hazardous materials.

In addition, there is the potential that individual future development projects would use and store limited amounts of potentially hazardous materials typical; refer to Section 5.9. All future development activities requiring the routine use, storage, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials would be subject to all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations and standards in place for hazardous materials.

Compliance with these regulations and standards would protect against significant and irreversible environmental changes due to the accidental release of hazardous materials.

In conclusion, future construction and operations would result in the irretrievable commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources, which would limit the availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of the individual developments. It is noted that the continued use of such resources would be on a relatively small scale in a regional context.

IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS/IRREVERSIBLE PHYSICAL CHANGES Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the Project would result in irretrievable commitments by designating land for development that is more intense, in some instances, than current designations allow. Additionally, residential development would be allowed on land not currently designated for residential development. Development would physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emissions, noise, and traffic. These physical changes are irreversible after development occurs. Therefore, the Project would result in changes in land use within the Planning Area that would commit future generations to these uses.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-3 Other CEQA Considerations In summary, the General Plan Update includes an extensive policy framework that is designed to address land use and environmental issues to the greatest extent feasible, while allowing growth and economic prosperity for the City. Construction and operation of future development projects associated with Project implementation would result in the irretrievable commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources that would limit the availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of the Project. However, the Planning Area is an urbanized area and already uses such resources. Additionally, the continued use of such resources would be on a relatively small scale in a regional context. As such, although irreversible environmental changes would result from the Project, such changes would not be considered significant.

6.3 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
Section 15126.2(e) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR evaluate the growth-inducing impacts of a proposed action. A growth-inducing impact is defined by the CEQA Guidelines as:
“The way in which a proposed project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment.

Included in this are projects which would remove obstacles to population growth (a major expansion of a waste water treatment plant might, for example, allow for more construction in service areas). Increases in the population may tax existing community service facilities, requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. Also discuss the characteristic of some projects which may encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment, either individually or cumulatively. It must not be assumed that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment.”
The State CEQA Guidelines do not provide specific criteria for evaluating growth inducement. Growthinducing impacts fall into two general categories: direct or indirect. Direct growth-inducing impacts are generally associated with new residences or businesses that could induce population growth directly.

Indirect growth-inducing impacts provide urban services, such as the extension or roads or other infrastructure, to an undeveloped area that could induce population growth indirectly.

In general, a project may foster spatial, economic, or population growth in a geographic area if it results in any of the following:
• Removal of an impediment to growth (e.g., establishment of an essential public service and provision of new access to an area);
• Fostering of economic expansion or growth (e.g., changes in revenue base and employment expansion);
• Fostering of population growth (e.g., construction of additional housing), either directly or indirectly;
• Establishment of a precedent-setting action (e.g., an innovation, a change in zoning and general plan amendment approval); or
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-4 Other CEQA Considerations • Development of or encroachment on an isolated or adjacent area of open space (being distinct from an infill project).

Should a project meet any one of the above-listed criteria, it may be considered growth inducing.

Generally, growth-inducing projects are either located in isolated, undeveloped, or underdeveloped areas, necessitating the extension of major infrastructure such as sewer and water facilities or roadways, or encourage premature or unplanned growth. Note that the CEQA Guidelines require an EIR to “discuss the ways” a project could be growth inducing and to “discuss the characteristics of some projects that may encourage…activities that could significantly affect the environment.” However, the CEQA Guidelines do not require that an EIR predict (or speculate) specifically where such growth would occur, in what form it would occur, or when it would occur. The answers to such questions require speculation, which CEQA discourages (refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15145).

In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines and based on the above-listed criteria, the project’s potential growth-inducing impacts are evaluated below.

Removal of an Impediment to Growth: The Planning Area and surrounding area are fully developed and urbanized. Transportation and infrastructure exists to serve the range of residential and non-residential uses within the surrounding area. The General Plan Update does not introduce new roadways or new or significantly expanded infrastructure that would provide for additional development within the surrounding area. Potential infrastructure improvements associated with future site-specific development would not remove obstacles to growth since the Planning and surrounding area are already served by existing utility providers and potential improvements would be to serve the specific development being proposed. As the General Plan Update would not establish an essential public service or provide new access to an area, the proposed Project would not be considered growth-inducing.

Economic Expansion or Growth: In addition to residential uses, the Project anticipates the development of commercial uses within the Planning Area. The construction of future development projects would result in construction-related jobs. However, construction activities and durations would vary depending upon the specific development and would be temporary in respect to each individual development site and therefore, would not be considered growth-inducing.

Project operations would introduce new residents and jobs to the Planning Area. Future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would primarily consist of infill development and redevelopment of already developed sites. New residential development could occur and greater densities, providing additional housing opportunities that would further support commercial and retail uses within the City. Additional non-residential development would provide for new employment opportunities. Residents and employees would seek shopping, entertainment, employment, and other economic opportunities in the City and surrounding area. This could create an increased demand for goods and services that would encourage the creation of new businesses or the expansion of existing businesses. Although economic growth is anticipated within the Planning Area, significant economic growth resulting in the potential to significantly affect the environment is not anticipated as the surrounding area is urbanized.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-5 Other CEQA Considerations Population Growth: A project could induce population growth in an area either directly or indirectly. More specifically, the development of new residences or businesses could induce population growth directly, whereas the extension of roads or other infrastructure could induce population growth indirectly. The Planning Area is located within an urbanized area served by existing roads, transit, and infrastructure. The Project does not involve the extension of roads or infrastructure into undeveloped areas; refer to the “Removal of an Impediment to Growth” discussion above.

As shown in Table 3-4, General Plan Update Growth Assumptions, buildout of the General Plan Update through 2045 could yield up to 3,942 new housing units and 808,864 square feet of new non-residential building square footage within the Planning Area. The General Plan Update is intended to accommodate the City’s fair share of Statewide housing needs, based on regional numbers provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development on a regular basis (every five to eight years). The City of Lawndale 2021-2029 Housing Element was adopted in February 2022 and accommodates the City’s share of the regional housing need for the 2021-2029 RHNA period of 2,463 units. The City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element identifies the implementation of Housing Overlays as the primary opportunity to accommodate the City’s RHNA allocation. The Project has the potential to yield an additional 3,942 dwelling units and 9,482 residents over existing conditions. This would be an approximately 34 percent increase over existing conditions and an approximately 38 percent increase over SCAG’s projected future conditions of 34,400 residents (2045). Thus, Project implementation would exceed the population projections anticipated by SCAG’s growth forecasts.

SCAG is the responsible agency for developing and adopting regional housing, population, and employment growth forecasts for local Los Angeles County governments, among other counties. SCAG provides household, population, and employment projection estimates in five-year increments through 2045. While Project growth projections are anticipated to exceed SCAG’s 2045 population, SCAG’s projections, which are compiled using a number of sources including adopted plans, historical trends, and interviews with local jurisdictions, tend to be more accurate on a regional level than on a local or city level.

It is likely that through a combination of market changes, catalytic projects, updated land use direction in the General Plan, and other factors, Lawndale could capture either more or less of expected regional growth than forecasted by SCAG. Discrepancies between Project and regional forecasts can also be attributed to the RHNA process. The General Plan Update is intended to implement the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element; SCAG’s Connect SoCal growth forecasts through 2045 do not consider the regional housing need for the 2021-2029 period, as jurisdictional allocations were not known at the time of SCAG’s Connect SoCal adoption. The regional housing needs and associated General Plan growth projections will be included as part of SCAG’s future growth forecasts.

Although the Project would allow for currently unplanned population growth anticipated in the existing General Plan and by SCAG, this Draft EIR identifies General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions, where appropriate, that would serve to reduce or eliminate potentially significant impacts associated with specific environmental issues associated with growth. Sections 5.1 through 5.20 provide a discussion of environmental effects associated with development allowed under the General Plan Update.

With implementation of General Plan Update goals, policies, and actions intended to guide growth to appropriate areas and provide services necessary to accommodate growth, the land uses allowed under Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-6 Other CEQA Considerations the General Plan Update, the infrastructure anticipated to accommodate proposed land uses, and the goal and policy framework would not induce growth that would exceed adopted thresholds. Therefore, population and housing growth associated with the General Plan Update would result a less than significant impact.

Establishment of a Precedent-Setting Action: The General Plan is a long-term plan intended to accommodate projected population, housing, and employment growth, including the appropriate balance among these factors with the necessary public services and infrastructure. The proposed General Plan Update would serve as a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of Lawndale. The proposed General Plan Update would only regulate future land development within the Planning Area and would not induce growth within areas outside of the City’s jurisdiction. Any future development within the Planning Area would be reviewed in light of the General Plan and this General Plan Update EIR pursuant to CEQA on a project-by-project basis. Future development would be required to comply with the goals, policies, and actions intended to reduce potential environmental impacts associated with future site-specific development. Thus, Project implementation would not involve a precedent-setting action that could significantly impact the environment.

Development or Encroachment of Open Space: As stated, the Planning Area is located within an urbanized area. Park and open space resources within the City are limited and primarily associated with parks and schools. The Project does not propose modifications to these existing resources and would not result in encroachment into these areas. The Project would not be growth-inducing with respect to development or encroachment into an isolated or adjacent area of an existing open space.

6.4 SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(b) requires an EIR to discuss unavoidable significant environmental effects, including those that can be mitigated but not reduced to a level of insignificance. The following significant and unavoidable impacts of the General Plan Update are discussed in Section 5.0. Refer to those discussions for further details and analysis of the significant and unavoidable impacts identified below:

Air Quality
• General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard during construction and operational activities. • General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction and operational activities. • General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts with the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-7 Other CEQA Considerations Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Project implementation would generate greenhouse gas emissions that would not satisfy the Greenhouse Gas reduction targets established by Federal and State law and may have a significant effect on the environment.
• Project implementation would contribute to global climate change through a cumulatively considerable contribution of greenhouse gases. The Project would result in a cumulatively considerable and significant adverse GHG emissions impact.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 6.0-8 Other CEQA Considerations This page intentionally left blank.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-1 Alternatives

7.0 ALTERNATIVES

7.1 INTRODUCTION
Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines requires the identification and evaluation of a range of reasonable alternatives designed to feasibly achieve the most basic objectives of the project, while avoiding or substantially lessening any of the significant environmental effects of the project. In addition, CEQA requires a comparative evaluation of the merits of the alternatives.

Pursuant to Section 15126.6(f)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, factors that may be taken into account when addressing the feasibility of alternatives include, but are not limited to, site suitability, economic viability, availability of infrastructure, general plan consistency, other plan or regulator limitations, jurisdictional boundaries, and whether the proponent can reasonably acquire, control or otherwise have access to the alternative site (or the site is already owned by the proponent). Although these factors do not present a strict limit on the scope of reasonable alternatives to be considered, they help establish the context in which “the rule of reason” is measured against when determining an appropriate range of alternatives sufficient to establish and foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making.

7.2 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN THIS EIR

FACTORS GUIDING SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES
A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was circulated to the public and a public scoping meeting was held during the public review period to solicit recommendations for a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project. No specific alternatives were recommended by commenting agencies or the general public during the NOP public review and comment period.

An EIR must only discuss in detail an alternative that is capable of feasibly attaining most of the basic objectives associated with an action, while at the same time avoiding or substantially lessening any of the significant effects associated with the proposed project. As described in Section 3.0, Project Description, the following objectives have been identified for the proposed Project:

1. Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

2. Address issues and concerns identified by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

3. Protect Lawndale’s existing residences, character, and sense of community;

4. Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner;

5. Encourage mixed-use development patterns that promote vibrant commercial and residential areas;

6. Allow for a range of high-quality housing options;
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-2 Alternatives

7. Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents;

8. Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities;

9. Maintain strong fiscal sustainability and continue to provide efficient and adequate public services;

10. Address new requirements of State law; and

11. Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS
The General Plan Update would result in the following significant and unavoidable impacts, which are described in Sections 5.1 through 5.20:

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Project implementation would generate greenhouse gas emissions that would not satisfy the Greenhouse Gas reduction targets established by Federal and State law and may have a significant effect on the environment.
• Project implementation would contribute to global climate change through a cumulatively considerable contribution of greenhouse gases. The Project would result in a cumulatively considerable and significant adverse GHG emissions impact.

Implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, policies and actions can reduce all other potentially significant impacts to less than significant levels. This section considers alternatives that could otherwise avoid or minimize these significant and unavoidable impacts. A description of each alternative and a comparative environmental evaluation of the impacts identified for the General Plan Update is provided below.

An EIR must identify an “environmentally superior” alternative and where the No Project Alternative is identified as environmentally superior, the EIR is then required to identify as environmentally superior an alternative from among the others evaluated. Each alternative’s environmental impacts are compared to the proposed Project and determined to be environmentally superior, inferior, or neutral. However, as stated above, only those impacts found to be significant and unavoidable for the proposed Project are Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-3 Alternatives
used in making the final determination of whether an alternative is environmentally superior or inferior to the proposed Project.

ALTERNATIVES TO THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Two alternatives to the General Plan Update were considered based on the analysis performed to identify the environmental effects of the proposed Project. Project alternatives focus on amending land uses to potentially address impacts. The alternatives analyzed in this EIR include the following:

Alternative 1: No Project Alternative/Existing General Plan.

As required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e), under Alternative 1, the City would not adopt the General Plan Update. The existing Lawndale General Plan would continue to be implemented and no changes to the General Plan, including the Land Use Map, goals, policies, or actions would occur. This Alternative assumes that ultimate development of the 1992 General Plan would occur and the 1992 General Plan would continue to provide outdated information regarding several issues, including projections and policy direction that were identified in the 1990s that are not reflective of the existing socioeconomic data and anticipated development patterns. This Alternative assumes that increased residential development opportunities in the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area and Housing Opportunity Overlay land use designation areas in order to accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) as identified in the 2021-2029 Housing Element, would not occur. Subsequent projects, such as updating the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan and amending the Municipal Code (including the zoning map), would not occur. The existing General Plan Land Use Map is shown on Figure

3.3 in Section 3.0, Project Description.

Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative
Under Alternative 2, the City would adopt the updated General Plan policy document, but at residential densities lower than those reflected in the proposed General Plan Update. This Alternative is defined by two major changes from the proposed General Plan Update:

1. Reduction in the maximum density associated with the Housing Opportunity Overlay (HOO) land use designation; in Alternative 2, the maximum density for residential development in areas designated with the HOO is reduced from 100 du/ac to 33 du/ac (consistent with the maximum density proposed for the High Density Residential land use designation).

2. Reduction in the maximum density associated with residential development within the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan (HBSP) land use designation; in Alternative 2, the maximum density for residential development in the HBSP is reduced from 150 du/ac to 33 du/ac (consistent with the maximum density proposed for the High Density Residential land use designation).

Under Alternative 2, non-residential development potential and anticipated job growth would remain unchanged from the proposed General Plan Update. This alternative continues to allow for mixed-use opportunities with less residential development potential than allowed under the General Plan Update. It also reflects a maximum residential density of 33 du/ac, consistent with the maximum residential density allowed under the current General Plan. This alternative was developed to potentially reduce the severity of potential impacts related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, as overall development of residential uses would be less than what could develop under the proposed Project.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-4 Alternatives

7.3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
A summary of the growth projections, including population growth, housing units, jobs, and the resultant job/housing balance for the project and each alternative is shown in Table 7-1, Growth Projections by Alternative.

Table 7-1
Growth Projections by Alternative
Alternative Housing
Units Population
NonResidential
Development
(Square Feet)
Jobs Jobs per
Housing Unit
Existing Conditions
Planning Area 11,463 37,948 4,542,162 6,470 0.56
New Growth
Proposed General Plan 3,942 9,482 808,864 2,738 -
Alternative 1: No
Project/Existing General
Plan
1,923 704 528,817 2,247 -
Alternative 2: Reduced
Growth Alternative 2,339 5,843 808,864 2,738 -
Buildout Growth: Existing plus New Growth
Proposed General Plan 15,405 47,430 5,351,026 9,208 0.59 Alternative 1: No
Project/Existing General
Plan
13,386 38,652 5,070,979 8,717 0.65
Alternative 2: Reduced
Growth Alternative 13,802 43,791 5,351,026 9,208 0.67
The alternatives analysis provides a summary of the relative impact level of significance associated with each alternative for each of the environmental issue areas analyzed in this EIR. Following the analysis of each alternative, Table 7-4, Comparison of Alternatives, summarizes the comparative effects of each alternative with the proposed Project.

The primary difference between the proposed Project and Alternative 2 is that Alternative 2 would result in approximately 1,603 fewer housing units and 3,639 fewer residents within the Planning Area when compared to the proposed Project; refer to Table 7-3, Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project.

ALTERNATIVE 1 – NO PROJECT/EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
Under Alternative 1, the City would continue to implement the existing General Plan and no changes would be made to address updated OPR General Plan Guidelines, or the requirements of State law. Since Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-5 Alternatives
adoption of the existing General Plan, State legislation has been passed requiring the City to address new safety and circulation requirements in the General Plan and to further address greenhouse gas emissions.

Additionally, the City recently updated its 2021-2029 Housing Element (adopted in February 2022), and the existing General Plan does not conform to State requirements regarding planning for future housing growth. In the 2021-2029 Housing Element, the City introduced two new mechanisms to allow for residential development to be created to implement the Housing Element on sites considered viable for housing development. The first is “Housing Overlay 100”, which will be applied to 16 nonresidential sites outside of the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area and allow for residential densities of up to 100 dwelling units per acre. The second is “Housing Overlay 150” which will be applied to 68 nonresidential sites inside the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area, will allow for residential densities up to 150 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan goals, policies, and actions, as well as the Land Use Map, would not be updated to address the vision and concerns of the City’s residents, property owners, decisionmakers, and other stakeholders that actively participated in the visioning and goal and policy development process.

Alternative 1 would result in the continuation of existing conditions and development levels, as described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, and as shown in Table 3-1 in Section 3.0, Project Description. New growth would be allowed as envisioned under the existing General Plan, with land uses required to be consistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Map as shown on Figure 3.3 in Section 3.0. Table 7-2, Alternative 1: No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project, compares the assumed development potential associated with the 1992 General Plan and the General Plan Update 2045 buildout.

Table 7-2
Alternative 1: No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project Alternative Housing Units Population
Non-Residential
Development
(Square Feet)
Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
Alternative 1: Existing General
Plan/No Project 13,386 38,652 5,070,979 8,717 0.65
General Plan Update
(Proposed Project) 15,405 47,430 5,351,026 9,208 0.59
Difference -2,019 -8,778 -280,047 -491 -
As shown in Table 7-2, Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative) would result in less development within the Planning Area compared to the proposed Project. Under Alternative 1, the existing General Plan policy framework would still be in effect, which would constitute a status quo approach to land use regulation in the City.

The Proposed Land Use Map, along with the policy framework proposed by the General Plan Update, encourages and aims to achieve a community with a balanced land use pattern that meets the City’s longterm housing, employment, and civic needs. The land uses allowed under the General Plan Update provide opportunities for cohesive new growth at infill locations primarily within the Hawthorne Boulevard Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-6 Alternatives
Specific Plan area. A balanced land use pattern would create a community where new development blends with existing neighborhoods. The proposed General Plan Update carries forward and enhances policies and measures from the City’s existing General Plan that were intended for environmental protection. The proposed General Plan Update was prepared in conformance with State laws and regulations associated with the preparation of general plans, including requirements for environmental protection.

Alternative 1 would not include updated policies, particularly those related to housing, greenhouse gases, hazards, complete streets, and environmental justice to address environmental health concerns for disadvantaged communities, as required by State law. This alternative would not include policies proposed in the General Plan Update to ensure protection of environmental resources, both at a project level and under cumulative conditions, consistent with the objectives of CEQA.

Alternative 1 fails to meet several of the basic Project objectives, including the following:
• Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by City residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;
• Address issues and concerns identified by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;
• Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner; • Encourage mixed-use development patterns that promote vibrant commercial and residential areas;
• Allow for a range of high-quality housing options;
• Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents; • Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities; • Address new requirements of State law; and
• Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

Aesthetics
As described in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, impacts related to Aesthetics were found to be less than significant. Both the General Plan Update and No Project/Existing General Plan Alternative would anticipate increased development within the City through future development that would result in densification of the City. Alternative 1 would result in decreased densities in the Planning Area when compared to the General Plan Update. Future projects under both development scenarios would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements. Although buildout of this Alternative would result in 2,019 fewer housing units and 280,047 fewer square feet of nonresidential uses, overall, the Planning Area would experience significant development compared to existing conditions which would change the character and image of the area under both Alternative 1 and the proposed Project.

Generally, the existing General Plan would not address the visual character of future development to the extent of the General Plan Update. For example, the General Plan Update includes goals and policies to develop and enforce design standards and objective design guidelines, and include site planning Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-7 Alternatives
requirements. Additionally, this Alternative would not require the update of the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area, which would allow a combination of commercial and residential uses together in the same area, creating more pedestrian and transit-oriented neighborhoods. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Agricultural Resources
As described in Section 5.2, Agricultural Resources, the proposed General Plan Update would result in no impacts to agriculture and forestry resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that no agriculture and forestry resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 1 would be the same and no impacts would occur. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Air Quality
As described in Section 5.3, Air Quality, construction and operation of future developments would occur within close proximity to sensitive receptors, and there is the potential for localized emissions to exceed regulatory levels. The following significant impacts related to air quality have been identified:
• General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard during construction and operational activities. • General Plan implementation would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction and operational activities. • General Plan implementation would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts with the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce air quality emissions, including policies to encourage mixeduse development, complete streets, and multi-modal improvements that would further reduce air quality impacts. Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to the proposed mix of higher density residential and commercial development. While land uses and development under Alternative 1 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emissions, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in air emissions under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update, although impacts to air quality would continue to be significant and unavoidable.

As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-8 Alternatives
Biological Resources
The Planning Area is urbanized and developed with residential and non-residential uses. The Planning Area consists primarily of developed and/or disturbed land that has been developed, paved, or landscaped, and existing vegetation consists of primarily ornamental and/or nonnative plant species. As described in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, the General Plan Update does not include any specific development proposals and would not result in significant direct impacts to existing biological resources.

However, subsequent development projects under the proposed General Plan Update could result in direct impacts to certain species found present on an individual project site. Future development projects would be required to adhere to applicable Federal, State, and local regulations that provide for sensitive species as part of the discretionary approval process for site-specific development projects. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations, and implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions, would reduce potential impacts to sensitive species to a less than significant level.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns to the General Plan Update, which could result in a less than significant impact to biological resources. The proposed General Plan Update would also include updated biological policies and actions aimed at protecting biological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.4), which Alternative 1 would not include. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.5, Cultural Resources, while the General Plan Update does not directly propose site-specific development with the potential to directly impact cultural resources, future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of known or unknown historic or archaeological resources. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered by the City, each project would be evaluated for conformance with the City’s General Plan, Municipal Code, and other applicable State and local regulations relative to historic and potentially historic resources. The General Plan Update Resource Management Element includes goals, policies, and actions addressing heritage resources, including historical and archaeological resources. Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations, would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical and/or cultural resource and impacts would be less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint to the General Plan Update. However, because Alternative 1 would not update cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring that is included in the proposed General Plan Update, impacts to cultural resources would be greater when compared to the General Plan Update which does not include additional and updated policies related to cultural resources. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Energy
As described in Section 5.6, Energy, buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-9 Alternatives
fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2045 buildout of the General Plan Update. Buildout of the General Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. Energy use impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce energy usage, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi-modal improvements that would further reduce per capita energy usage. Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling to the proposed mix of higher density residential and commercial development. While land uses and development under Alternative 1 would be required to adhere to the same local, State, and regional measures regulating energy usage as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in electricity and gas for the operation of buildings, diesel fuel for off-road construction activities, and potential reductions in gasoline due to a decrease in the overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in energy usage under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update.

As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Geology and Soils
As described in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, geology and soils impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. It is possible that undiscovered paleontological resources could be encountered during future ground-disturbing activities within the Planning Area. Future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be required to assess the potential for development proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. If the project involves earthworks, the City may require a study conducted by a professional paleontologist to determine if paleontological assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact the resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid impacting the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation. With implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions, potential impacts to paleontological resources associated with future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would be reduced to less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns as the General Plan Update. Since the Planning Area is the same under both development scenarios, similar physical constraints related to geology and soils exist. The potential for new development to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic ground shaking and geologic instabilities would be similar under this Alternative and the General Plan Update. Further, new development would be required to comply with the California Building Code and applicable Municipal Code requirements. However, this Alternative would not include the updated policies related to geologic hazards, including requirements for project reviews and standards for construction and building practices as the General Plan Update (as described in detail in Section 5.7).

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-10 Alternatives
Additionally, this Alternative would not update paleontological resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring that is included in the proposed General Plan Update, therefore impacts to paleontological resources would be greater when compared to the General Plan Update which does not include additional and updated policies related to paleontological resources. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
As described in Section 5.8, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the proposed Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the State of California and the SCAQMD aimed at the reduction of air pollutant emissions, and implementation of the General Plan Update’s goals, policies and actions would reduce GHG emissions. However, development projects associated with implementation of the proposed Project, would potentially generate emissions inconsistent with the State’s long-term goals for reducing GHG emissions in the State of California, particularly the net-zero target as promulgated under AB 1279.

As such, the City cannot state with certainty whether implementation of the General Plan Update would meet the State’s community emissions target. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a cumulatively significant and unavoidable adverse impact in regards to greenhouse gas emissions.

When compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update includes a range of goals and policies that would reduce GHG emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi-modal improvements that would further reduce per capita GHG impacts. Additionally, when compared to Alternative 1 (No Project/Existing General Plan), the General Plan Update presents substantially more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential and commercial development. While land uses and development under Alternative 1 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emission, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in greenhouse gas emissions under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update, although GHG impacts would continue to be significant and unavoidable. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As described in Section 5.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, all impacts related to hazardous materials, aircraft hazards, and emergency response were found to be less than significant.

The General Plan Update would include updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials. These policies and actions in the General Plan Update would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with Federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-11 Alternatives
emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance (as described in detail in Section 5.9).

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would result in additional urban uses including commercial, and residential development. However, Alternative 1 would not include the updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials that are included as part of the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Hydrology and Water Quality
As described in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, under all impact areas, implementation of the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality.

While this Alternative would result in less dense and intense development compared to the General Plan Update, all new development would be subject to applicable stormwater and water quality requirements per the Los Angeles RWQCB. This variation in intensity and land use designation changes would not substantially alter impacts from or to flooding, water quality, or on groundwater supplies because existing Federal, State, and local regulations would apply to guard against flood hazards, water quality contamination, or impact on groundwater supplies. Potential hydrology and water quality impact for this Alternative, like the proposed Project, would be less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in slightly reduced development of housing units and non-residential square feet when compared to the General Plan Update. Compared to the General Plan Update, the potential water quality impacts related to construction and operation would be similar. As described in Section

5.10, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in construction, or long-term impacts to surface water quality from urban stormwater runoff. Future development under all alternatives would also be required to submit a SWPPP with BMPs to the RWQCB and comply with all storm water sewer system (MS4) requirements. It would be expected that impacts related to water quality would be similar under Alternative 1 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Land Use and Planning
The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 1 are long-range land use plans. As described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, all impacts related to land use and planning were found to be less than significant under the General Plan Update. As described previously, the General Plan Update would include adoption of the updated policy document. Under Alternative 1, the existing Land Use Element would continue to provide outdated information that does not reflect the current conditions or goals of the City. This Alternative would prevent the City from achieving some of the core objectives of the General Plan Update to meet new State requirements and accommodating the City’s RHNA allocation as identified in the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element. In addition, the General Plan Update would allow for greater consistency with applicable State and regional plans related to the provision of housing options at varying densities and income levels within an area served by transit, retail, and services to provide opportunities to reduce VMT and associated GHG emissions when compared to Alternative 1. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-12 Alternatives
Mineral Resources
As described in Section 5.12, Mineral Resources, the General Plan Update would result in no impacts relating to mineral resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that no mineral resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 1 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Noise
As described in Section 5.13, Noise, while the General Plan Update does not directly propose site-specific development, future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could generate additional noise from construction and operational activities associated with future projects.

Where future development projects under the General Plan Update may be exposed to noise levels that exceed the land use compatibility criteria, such as residential developments within the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area or sensitive land uses developed adjacent to the existing rail line, impacts could be mitigated to a level that is less than significant with the implementation of noise control measures, such as relocating residential outdoor recreational areas away from 60 dBA CNEL or greater areas or shielding outdoor areas using noise barriers. Additionally, the General Plan Update Public Safety Element includes policies and actions intended to minimize exposure to excessive noise, including noise associated with traffic, stationary noise sources, and construction noise.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the General Plan Update. Alternative 1 would allow for slightly less development (2,019 fewer housing units and 280,047 square feet less of non-residential uses), resulting in a corresponding reduction in construction and operational noise. The decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in roadway noise under Alternative 1 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Population and Housing
As shown in Table 7-2, Alternative 1 would allow for 2,019 fewer residential units which would result in 8,778 less residents compared to the General Plan Update. Alternative 1 would not establish updated goals and policies intended to reduce potential growth-related impacts when compared to the General Plan Update. The Existing General Plan does not reflect the most current population, employment, and housing numbers or projections, nor does it provide quantitative population, employment, and housing projections for the year 2045. In contrast, the General Plan Update reflects existing population, employment, and housing conditions and provides projections to 2045.

While the amount and typology of allowable development under the General Plan Update has been crafted to meet City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for future housing needs, Alternative 1, would not allow the City to adequately plan for population growth and housing to meet its RHNA obligations. The City failing to meet its RHNA obligations would result in the decertification of the adopted Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-13 Alternatives
Housing Element by the State and potential penalties such as the loss of significant grants. As such, this Alternative would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Public Services and Recreation
As described in Section 5.15, Public Services and Section 5.16, Parks and Recreation, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to public services, parks and recreation. New development would place increased demands on public services such as police, fire, schools, parks, libraries, and other governmental services. The General Plan Update includes policies and actions and compliance with the Municipal Code would require payment of impact fees to the City and other public agencies to ensure that additional development allowed does not have adverse impacts on these services and agencies.

Under Alternative 1, the development area and development types would remain similar, however, there would be fewer jobs, housing units, and reduced population increase when compared to the General Plan Update and thus, impacts to public services (the demand for police, fire and other public services) would be slightly reduced. Overall, Alternative 1 would have a slightly reduced impact to public services when compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Transportation
As described in Section 5.17, Transportation, transportation impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not conflict with policies, plans, or programs regarding roadways, bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities or the performance or safety of those facilities. The Project includes goals, policies and actionsto encourage new and improved facilities to support multi-modal transportation and access within the Planning Area.

Similarly, Alternative 1 would provide for increased density and development within the Planning Area and would not conflict with policies, plans, or programs regarding roadways, bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities or the performance or safety of those facilities.

The proposed Project would result in a VMT per capita and VMT per employee below the Los Angeles Countywide average. Comparing the Project to Alternative 1, there would be an increase in VMT per capita and a decrease in VMT per employee. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Tribal Cultural Resources
As described in Section 5.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, while the General Plan Update does not directly propose site-specific development with the potential to directly impact tribal cultural resources, future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of known or unknown tribal cultural resources. Potential impacts to tribal cultural resources associated with future development would be reduced through implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. Subsequent discretionary projects implemented in accordance with the General Plan Update would be subject to the provisions of AB 52 and may require tribal consultation Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-14 Alternatives
with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Planning Area and who have previously requested AB 52 consultations with the City. Future AB 52 consultation may identify tribal cultural resources not yet found and formally recorded that could be impacted by subsequent projects. Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource and impacts would be less than significant.

Alternative 1 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed General Plan Update. However, Alternative 1 would not update tribal cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring compared with the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Utilities and Service Systems
As described in Section 5.19, Utilities and Service Systems, the General Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts relating to utilities and service systems.

New development would place increased demands on utilities. Under Alternative 1, the Planning Area would be developed with similar development patterns and uses as the General Plan Update; however, the overall residential intensity/density, and job increases would be reduced. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as this alternative would require similar development patterns and footprints, but the demand for utility services, including wastewater and solid waste services would be less than would be required under the General Plan Update. However, both Alternative 1 and the proposed Project would likely require the construction or expansion of new utilities to serve the site-specific development that is being proposed. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as the Project Area is urbanized and contains existing utilities infrastructure. The potential environmental effects associated with infrastructure projects would be similar under Alternative 1 and the proposed Project. Similarly, storm drainage runoff under Alternative 1 would be approximately the same when compared to the proposed Project, due to the general development footprint remaining the same for this alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. Since demand for utilities would be slightly less under Alternative 1 due to the lower densities and associated development potential, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Wildfire
As described in Section 5.20, Wildfire, the Planning Area is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones; the General Plan Update would result in no impacts related to wildfire. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 1 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that the Planning Area is not located in an area of high fire hazard potential, impacts associated with Alternative 1 would be the same and no impacts would occur. As such, Alternative 1 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-15 Alternatives
Irreversible Effects
The proposed Project would have a less than significant impact associated with irreversible environmental effects as described in Section 6.0, Other CEQA Considerations. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the Project would result in irretrievable commitments by designating land for development that is more intense, in some instances, than current designations allow. Additionally, residential development would be allowed on land not currently designated for residential development.

Development would physically change the environment in terms of aesthetics, air emissions, noise, and traffic. Therefore, the Project would result in changes in land use within the Planning Area that would commit future generations to these uses. Construction and operation of future development projects associated with Project implementation would result in the irretrievable commitment of limited, slowly renewable, and nonrenewable resources that would limit the availability of these resource quantities for future generations or for other uses during the life of the Project. However, the Planning Area is an urbanized area and already uses such resources. Additionally, the continued use of such resources would be on a relatively small scale in a regional context. As such, although irreversible environmental changes would result from the Project, such changes would not be considered significant.

During the planning horizon, development under Alternative 1 would be reduced in comparison to the General Plan Update. Under cumulative conditions, Alternative 1 would result in less residential and less non-residential floor area (see Table 7-1). Alternative 1 would use nonrenewable resources, including metals, stone, and other materials related to construction, and result in on-going demand for fossil fuels and other resources associated with energy production at levels lower than the proposed Project.

Alternative 1 would have slightly reduced impacts in comparison to the General Plan Update due to reduced development levels. As such, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

ALTERNATIVE 2 – REDUCED GROWTH ALTERNATIVE
Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) continues to allow for new development in mixed-use opportunities, like those included in the proposed Project, but at lower densities that are more consistent with those allowed under the current General Plan. Table 7-3, Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project, compares the assumed development potential associated with the Reduced Growth Alternative and the General Plan Update 2045 buildout.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-16 Alternatives
Table 7-3
Alternative 2: Reduced Growth Alternative Compared to the Proposed Project Alternative Housing Units Population
Non-Residential
Development
(Square Feet)
Jobs
Jobs per
Housing
Unit
Alternative 2: Reduced Growth
Alternative 13,802 43,791 5,351,026 9,208 0.67
General Plan Update
(Proposed Project) 15,405 47,430 5,351,026 9,208 0.59
Difference -1,603 -3,639 0 0 -
The goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan Update would apply to subsequent development, planning, and infrastructure projects under this alternative. This Alternative was developed to reduce the severity of potential impacts related to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, as overall development of residential uses within the Planning Area would be less than what could under the proposed Project.

As shown in Table 7-3, Alternative 2 would result in approximately 1,603 fewer housing units and 3,639 fewer residents within the Planning Area when compared to the proposed General Plan Land Use Map.

Nonresidential development potential and employment opportunities would remain the same under this alternative when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. The City recently updated its 2021- 2029 Housing Element (adopted in February 2022), and the existing General Plan does not conform to State requirements regarding planning for future housing growth. In the 2021-2029 Housing Element, the City introduced two new mechanisms to allow for residential development to be created to implement the Housing Element on sites considered viable for housing development. The first is “Housing Overlay 100”, which will be applied to 16 nonresidential sites outside of the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area and allow for residential densities of up to 100 dwelling units per acre. The second is “Housing Overlay 150” which will be applied to 68 nonresidential sites inside the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area, will allow for residential densities up to 150 dwelling units per acre. This Alternative assumes that the 2021-2029 Housing Element would be in non-compliance, since it would not implement these mechanisms at the planned densities.

Alternative 2 fails to meet several of the basic Project objectives, including the following:
• Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner; • Allow for a range of high-quality housing options;
• Address new requirements of State law; and
• Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

Aesthetics
As described in Section 5.1, Aesthetics, impacts related to Aesthetics were found be less than significant.

Both the General Plan Update and Reduced Growth Alternative would anticipate increased development and associated densification within the City. The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-17 Alternatives
allow for an increase in density of the existing land uses than is currently allowed. Future projects under both development scenarios would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements. Although, buildout of this Alternative would result in 1,603 fewer housing units, overall, the Planning Area would experience significant development compared to existing conditions which would change the character and image of the area under both Alternative 2 and the proposed Project.

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would provide guidance as to the intensity and density of development. Future projects under both development scenarios would be subject to applicable Municipal Code requirements and be guided by relevant General Plan Update policies. Neither Alternative 2 nor the proposed Project would conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. As such, Alternative 2 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Agricultural Resources
As described in Section 5.2, Agricultural Resources, the proposed General Plan Update would result in no impacts to agriculture and forestry resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that no agriculture and forestry resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and no impacts would occur. As such, Alternative 2 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Both Alternative 2 and the General Plan Update would provide opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to the proposed mix of higher density residential and commercial development. While land uses and development under Alternative 2 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional air quality measures as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units, and the corresponding reduction in construction emissions, operational emission, and potential reductions in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in air emissions under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-18 Alternatives
2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update, although air quality impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Biological Resources
The Planning Area is urbanized and developed with residential and non-residential uses. The Planning Area consists primarily of developed and/or disturbed land that has been developed, paved, or landscaped, and existing vegetation consists of primarily ornamental and/or nonnative plant species. As described in Section 5.4, Biological Resources, the General Plan Update does not include any specific development proposals and would not result in significant direct impacts to existing biological resources.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns to the General Plan Update, which could result in a less than significant impact to biological resources. The proposed General Plan Update and Alternatives 2 would also include updated biological policies and actions aimed at protecting biological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.4). Therefore, impacts to biological resources under Alternative 2 would remain the same when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed Project. Additionally, Alternative 2 would update cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. The impact under Alternatives 2 would remain the same compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-19 Alternatives
Energy
As described in Section 5.6, Energy, buildout of the General Plan Update would use energy resources for the operation of buildings (electricity and natural gas), for on-road vehicle trips (e.g., gasoline and diesel fuel), and from off-road construction activities (e.g. diesel fuel) associated with 2045 buildout of the General Plan Update. Buildout of the General Plan Update would be in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local regulations regulating energy usage. Energy use impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant.

While land uses and development under Alternative 2 would be required to adhere to the same policy guidance and local, State, and regional measures regulating energy usage as the General Plan Update, the decrease in residential units, and the corresponding reduction in electricity and gas for the operation of buildings, diesel fuel for off-road construction activities, and potential reductions in gasoline due to a decrease in the overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in energy usage under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Geology and Soils
As described in Section 5.7, Geology and Soils, geology and soils impacts associated with the implementation of the General Plan Update would be less than significant. It is possible that undiscovered paleontological resources could be encountered during future ground-disturbing activities within the Planning Area. Future development associated with implementation of the General Plan Update would be required to assess the potential for development proposals to significantly impact paleontological resources pursuant to CEQA. If the project involves earthwork, the City may require a study conducted by a professional paleontologist to determine if paleontological assets are present, and if the project will significantly impact resources. If significant impacts are identified, the City may require the project to be modified to avoid impacting the paleontological materials, require monitoring of rock units with high potential to contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources, or require mitigation measures to mitigate the impacts, such as recovering the paleontological resources for preservation. With implementation of the General Plan Update policies and actions, potential impacts to paleontological resources associated with future development anticipated by the General Plan Update would be reduced to less than significant.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns to the General Plan Update. Since the Planning Area is the same under both development scenarios, similar physical constraints related to geology and soils exist. The potential for new development to expose people or structures to adverse effects associated with seismic ground shaking and geologic instabilities would be similar under this Alternative and the General Plan Update. Further, new development would be required to comply with the California Building Code and applicable Municipal Code requirements. The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would also include updated policies related to geologic hazards, including requirements for project reviews and standards for construction and building practices, as well as updated policies related to mitigate potential impacts to paleontological resources (as described in detail in Section 5.7). Therefore, impacts under Alternative 2 related to Geology and Soils would generally remain the same as the General Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-20 Alternatives
Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Under Alternative 2, the Planning Area would be developed with similar uses as the General Plan Update, but the potential increase in total housing units and population would be reduced. The reduced residential development potential and resulting population may decrease total greenhouse gas emissions when compared to the General Plan Update. The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 include a range of goals and policies that would reduce GHG emissions, including policies to encourage mixed-use development, complete streets, and multi-modal improvements that would further reduce per capita and per employee GHG impacts. Both the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 present more opportunities for trip internalization and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling due to their proposed mix of higher density residential and commercial development. However, the greenhouse gas emissions impact would be decreased slightly under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update, although GHG impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
As described in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, all impacts related to hazardous materials, aircraft hazards, and emergency response were found to be less than significant.

The General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would include updated policies and actions aimed at protecting the public from hazardous materials. These policies and actions in the General Plan Update would ensure that potential hazards are identified on a project site, that development is located in areas where potential exposure to hazards and hazardous materials can be mitigated to an acceptable level, and that business operations comply with Federal and State regulations regarding the use, transport, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The General Plan Update also includes policies and actions to ensure that the City has adequate emergency response plans and measures to respond in the event of an accidental release of a hazardous substance (as described in detail in Section 5.9).

Similar to the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would result in additional urban uses including commercial and residential development. Impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials and emergency response under Alternative 2 would remain the same when compared to the proposed Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-21 Alternatives
General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

While this Alternative would result in less dense development compared to the General Plan Update, all new development would be subject to applicable stormwater and water quality requirements per the Los Angeles RWQCB. This variation in intensity and land use designation changes would not substantially alter impacts from or to flooding, water quality, or on groundwater supplies because existing Federal, State, and local regulations would apply to guard against flood hazards, water quality contamination, or impact on groundwater supplies. Potential hydrology and water quality impacts for this alternative, like the proposed Project, would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 would result in slightly reduced development of housing units when compared to the General Plan Update. Compared to the General Plan Update, the potential water quality impacts related to construction and operation would be similar. As described in Section 5.10, implementation of the General Plan Update would not result in construction, or long-term impacts to surface water quality from urban stormwater runoff. Future development under all alternatives would also be required to submit a SWPPP with BMPs to the RWQCB and comply with all storm water sewer system (MS4) requirements. It would be expected that impacts related to water quality would be similar under Alternative 2 as compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Land Use and Planning
The proposed General Plan Update and Alternative 2 are long-range land use plans. As described in Section 5.11, Land Use and Planning, all impacts related to land use and planning were found to be less than significant under the General Plan Update. As described previously, the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 would include adoption of the updated policy document. This Alternative would prevent the City from achieving some of the core objectives of the General Plan Update to meet new State requirements and accommodating the City’s RHNA allocation as identified in the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element. This Alternative would result in inconsistency between the General Plan Elements, and would require amendments to the 2021-2029 Housing Element to provide consistency. In addition, the General Plan Update would allow for greater consistency with applicable State and regional plans related to the provision of housing options at varying densities and income levels within an area served by transit, retail, and services to provide opportunities to reduce VMT and associated GHG emissions when compared to Alternative 2. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

Mineral Resources
As described in Section 5.12, Mineral Resources, the General Plan Update would result in no impacts relating to mineral resources. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that no mineral Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-22 Alternatives
resources would be impacted by the proposed Project, impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 2 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the General Plan Update. Alternative 2 would allow for less development (1,603 fewer housing units), resulting in a corresponding reduction in construction and operational noise. The decrease in residential units and non-residential building square footage, and the corresponding reduction in overall traffic volumes would result in reductions in roadway noise under Alternative 2 when compared to the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Population and Housing
Similar to the General Plan Update, this Alternative would update the City’s environmental baseline conditions and development projections through 2045. As shown in Table 7-3, the Reduced Growth Alternative would anticipate 1,603 fewer residential units compared to the General Plan Update, which would result in 3,639 less residents compared to Alternative 2. Both the General Plan Update and Reduced Growth Alternative account for population growth and establish goals and policies to reduce potential growth-related impacts. The net increase in population and housing is nominal and would result in similar less than significant impacts.

The amount and typology of allowable development under the General Plan Update and Alternative 2 has been crafted to meet City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for future housing needs. While Alternative 2 would provide sufficient development capacity to accommodate the City’s RHNA, the development assumption in the City’s adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element would need to be updated to assume that each housing opportunity site would be developed at the maximum allowable density and the City would be required to prove in the Housing Element based on substantial evidence that development at this density allowed under Alternative 2 would be feasible.

Given the limited development history of similar projects in the City, it would be challenging to provide the evidence required to prove development of each housing opportunity site at maximum allowable Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-23 Alternatives
density. If the State does not approve the City’s analysis, the State may withdraw certification of the City’s Housing Element, even if sufficient development capacity is provided to accommodate its RHNA.

However, since the lower density does not preclude the City from meeting it’s RHNA obligations, impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and would remain less than significant. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Under Alternative 2, the development area and development types would remain similar, however, there would be slightly fewer jobs, dwelling units, and reduced population increase when compared to the General Plan Update and thus, impacts to public services (the demand for police, fire and other public services) would be slightly reduced. Overall, Alternative 2 would have a slightly reduced impact to public services when compared to the proposed Project. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Alternative 2 also includes a more balanced mix of uses and additional opportunities for increased densities as part of mixed-use developments which includes opportunities for trip internalization, and increased opportunities for walking and bicycling. Overall, Alternative 2 would slightly reduce densities as part of mixed-use developments when compared to the General Plan Update, therefore this alternative would have slightly increased impacts relative to per capita VMT when compared to the General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered environmentally inferior to the General Plan Update.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-24 Alternatives
tribal cultural resources associated with future development would be reduced through implementation of General Plan Update policies and actions. Subsequent development and infrastructure projects would be analyzed for potential environmental impacts, consistent with the requirements of CEQA, pursuant to the City’s entitlement review process. Subsequent discretionary projects implemented in accordance with the General Plan Update would be subject to the provisions of AB 52 and may require tribal consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Planning Area and who have previously requested AB 52 consultations with the City. Future AB 52 consultations may identify tribal cultural resources not yet found and formally recorded that could be impacted by subsequent projects. Compliance with the General Plan Update policies and actions and existing regulations would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource and impacts would be less than significant.

Alternative 2 would result in similar development patterns and a similar development footprint as the proposed General Plan Update. Additionally, Alternative 2 would update tribal cultural resource policies to include new policies and actions related to agency coordination, consultation, and monitoring consistent with the proposed General Plan Update. Potential impacts to tribal cultural resources would be the same under Alternative 2 and the proposed General Plan Update. As such, Alternative 2 is considered neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

New development would place increased demands on utilities. Under Alternative 2, the Planning Area would be developed with similar development patterns and uses as the General Plan Update, however, the overall residential density increases would be reduced. The quantity of infrastructure installed would not be substantially reduced, as the Project Area is urbanized and contains existing utilities infrastructure.

The potential environmental effects associated with infrastructure projects would be similar under Alternative 2 and the proposed Project. Similarly, storm drainage runoff under Alternative 2 would be approximately the same when compared to the proposed Project, due to the general development footprint remaining the same for this alternative when compared to the General Plan Update. Since demand for utilities would be slightly less under Alternative 2 due to the lower densities and associated development potential, Alternative 1 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

Wildfire
As described in Section 5.20, Wildfire, the Planning Area is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones; the General Plan Update would result in no impacts related to wildfire. Like the General Plan Update, Alternative 2 would accommodate development generally in the same areas, and these areas are already urbanized. Given that the Planning Area is not located in an area of high fire hazard potential, impacts associated with Alternative 2 would be the same and no impacts would occur. As such, Alternative 2 would be neither environmentally superior nor inferior to the General Plan Update.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-25 Alternatives
Irreversible Effects
The proposed Project would have a less than significant impact associated with irreversible environmental effects as described in Section 6.0, Other CEQA Considerations. Implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a commitment of land uses designated for the foreseeable future. Land use and development consistent with the Project would result in irretrievable commitments by designating land for development that is more intense, in some instances, than current designations allow. Additionally, residential development would be allowed on land not currently designated for residential development.

During the planning horizon, development under Alternative 2 would be reduced in comparison to the General Plan Update. Under cumulative conditions, Alternative 2 would result in less housing units (see Table 7-1). Alternative 2 would use nonrenewable resources, including metals, stone, and other materials related to construction, and result in on-going demand for fossil fuels and other resources associated with energy production at levels lower than the proposed Project. Alternative 2 would have slightly reduced impacts in comparison to the General Plan Update due to reduced development levels. As such, Alternative 2 would be considered environmentally superior to the General Plan Update.

ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE
CEQA requires that an environmentally superior alternative be identified among the alternatives that are analyzed in the EIR. If the No Project Alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, an EIR must also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives (CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6(e)(2)). The environmentally superior alternative is that alternative with the least adverse environmental impacts when compared to the General Plan Update.

A comparative analysis of the General Plan Update and each of the Project alternatives is provided in Table 7-4, Comparison of Alternatives, below. As shown in Table 7-4, Alternative 2 (Reduced Growth Alternative) is the environmentally superior alternative when looked at in terms of all potential environmental impacts. While it would not eliminate the General Plan Update’s significant and unavoidable impacts, Alternative 2 would lessen the majority of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. Both alternatives fail to reduce any significant and unavoidable impacts to a less than significant level.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 7-26 Alternatives
Table 7-4
Comparison of Alternatives
Environmental Issue Alternative 1
(No Project)
Alternative 2
(Reduced Growth)
Aesthetics  =
Agricultural Resources = =
Air Quality * *
Biological Resources  =
Cultural Resources  =
Energy  
Geology and Soils  =
Greenhouse Gas Emissions * *
Hazards and Hazardous Materials  =
Hydrology and Water Quality = =
Land Use and Planning  
Mineral Resources = =
Noise  
Population and Housing  =
Public Services and Recreation  
Transportation = 
Tribal Cultural Resources  =
Utilities and Services Systems  
Wildfire = =
Irreversible Effects  
Notes:
 Indicates an impact that is greater than the Project (environmentally inferior).  Indicates an impact that is less than the Project (environmentally superior). = Indicates an impact that is equal to the Project (neither environmentally superior nor inferior). * Indicates a significant and unavoidable impact.

Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 8-1 Report Preparers

8.0 REPORT PREPARERS

8.1 LEAD AGENCY
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA, 90260
Sean Moore, City Manager
Jared Chavez, Planning Manager
Jose Hernandez, Associate Planner

8.2 PREPARERS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
De Novo Planning Group
180 East Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
Amanda Tropiano, Principal/Project Manager
Ben Ritchie, Principal
Starla Barker, AICP, Principal Planner
Ashley Brodkin, Senior Planner
Josh Smith, AICP, Senior Planner
Erik Anderson, Associate Planner

Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
750 The City Drive, Suite 410
Orange, CA 92868
Tim Erney, AICP, PTP, Senior Principal Planner
Fernando Sotelo, TE, Associate Engineer
MD Acoustics, LLC
1197 Los Angeles Avenue, Ste. C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Claire Pincock, INCE-USA
Rachel Edelman
Lawndale General Plan Update

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Public Review Draft | August 2023 8-2 Report Preparers
Duke Cultural Resources Management, LLC
18 Technology Drive, Ste. 103
Irvine, CA 92618
Curt Duke, M.A.

Edgar Alvarez, B.A.

Nicholas F. Hearth, M.A.

Benjamin Scherzer, M.S.

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(APPENDICES)

FOR THE

LAWNDALE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(SCH: 2022120088)
AUGUST 2023
Prepared for:

City of Lawndale
Community Development Department
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA 90260
Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
180 East Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(APPENDICES)

FOR THE

LAWNDALE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
(SCH: 2022120088)
AUGUST 2023
Prepared for:

City of Lawndale
Community Development Department
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA 90260
[email protected]
310-973-3206
Prepared by:

De Novo Planning Group
180 East Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780

Appendix A: NOP and NOP Comment Letters

NOP – City of Lawndale General Plan Update EIR
December 6, 2022 Page 2 of 5
agencies, trustee agencies and the Office of Planning and Research must submit any comments in response to this notice no later than the comment period deadline identified below. In accordance with the time limits established by CEQA, the NOP public review period will begin on Tuesday, December 6, 2022 and end on Thursday, January 5, 2023.

In the event that the City does not receive a response from any Responsible or Trustee Agency, or by any interested parties, by the end of the review period, the City may presume that the Responsible Agency, Trustee Agency, or interested party has no response to make (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(b)(2)).

Comments in response to this notice must be submitted to the address below, or by email by the close of the NOP review period, which is 5:00 PM on Thursday, January 5, 2023:

Jared Chavez - Community Development Manager
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260
Email: [email protected]
Scoping Meeting
The City will hold a scoping meeting to provide an opportunity for agency representatives and the public to assist the City in determining the scope and content of the EIR. The scoping meeting will be held on Thursday, December 15, 2022, at 6:30 p.m. The scoping meeting will not discuss the merits of the Project, but rather the environmental topics to be included in the environmental review. The location of the meeting is as follows:

Harold E. Hofmann Community Center
14700 Burin Avenue, 2nd Floor
Lawndale, CA 90260
Public Agency Approvals
The City Council is the final decision-making body for the General Plan Update. Before the City Council considers the proposed Project, the Planning Commission will review it and make recommendations to the City Council. While other agencies may be consulted during the General Plan Update process, their approval is not required for adoption of the General Plan. However, subsequent development under the General Plan Update may require approval of state, federal and responsible trustee agencies that may rely on the programmatic EIR for decisions in their areas of expertise.

NOP – City of Lawndale General Plan Update EIR
December 6, 2022 Page 3 of 5
Project Location and Setting
As shown on Figure 1, the City of Lawndale is located in the South Bay portion of Los Angeles County, approximately 10 miles southwest of downtown Los Angeles. Lawndale is bounded by the City of Hawthorne to the north and west, by unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County and the City of Gardena to the east, by the City of Torrance to the south, and by the City of Redondo Beach to the south and west.

Regional access to the City is provided by Interstate 405, a major north-south highway which provides access to Lawndale and the greater Los Angeles region.

The Planning Area is the geographic area for which the Plan provides a framework for long-term growth and resource conservation. State law requires the Plan to include all territory within Lawndale’s incorporated area as well as "any land outside its boundaries which in the planning agency's judgment bears relation to its planning" (California Government Code Section 65300). The Planning Area, as shown in Figure 2, includes the entire city limits (approximately 917 acres) as well as the City of Lawndale’s Sphere of Influence (approximately 229 acres); the entire Planning Area is approximately 1,146 acres.

Project Description
State law requires the City to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of its planning area. The General Plan must include land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, air quality, noise, safety, and environmental justice elements, as specified in Government Code Section 65302, to the extent that the issues identified by State law exist in the City’s planning area. Additional elements that relate to the physical development of the City may also be addressed in the General Plan. The degree of specificity and level of detail of the discussion of each General Plan Element need only reflect local conditions and circumstances. The City of Lawndale is preparing a comprehensive update to its existing General Plan. The General Plan is being prepared to address the requirements of State law and the relevant items addressed in Government Code Section 65300 et seq. The Lawndale General Plan will include all of the State-mandated elements, and will address two optional topics: Economic Development and Community Facilities.

The updated Lawndale General Plan is expected to be adopted in 2023 and will guide the City’s development and conservation through land use objectives and policy guidance. The General Plan is intended to be an expression of the community’s vision for the City and Planning Area and constitutes the policy and regulatory framework by which future development projects will be reviewed and public improvements will be implemented. The Lawndale General Plan will include a comprehensive set of goals, policies, and actions (implementation measures), as well as a revised Land Use Map (Figure 3). The revisions to the Land Use Map will include review and revision of the land uses within the existing Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area. The City will implement the General Plan by requiring development, infrastructure improvements, and other projects to be consistent with its policies and by implementing the actions included in the General Plan.

A goal in the General Plan is the broadest statement of community values. It is a generalized ideal which provides a sense of direction for action. They are overall statements of desired future conditions. The essence of the General Plan is contained within its policies. Policies are statements which further refine the goals, and guide the course of action the City must take to achieve the goals in the General Plan. It is important to note that policies are guides for decision makers, not decisions themselves. Action items are steps or actions the City should take to implement the General Plan.

NOP – City of Lawndale General Plan Update EIR
December 6, 2022 Page 4 of 5
The Lawndale General Plan Update is intended to reflect the desires and vision of Lawndale residents, businesses, the Planning Commission, and City Council. The following objectives were identified for the proposed update to the General Plan:

1. Reflect the current goals and vision expressed by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

2. Address issues and concerns identified by city residents, businesses, decision-makers, and other stakeholders;

3. Protect Lawndale’s existing residences, character, and sense of community;

4. Proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner;

5. Encourage mixed-use development patterns that promote vibrant commercial and residential areas;

6. Allow for a range of high-quality housing options;

7. Attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents;

8. Continue to maintain and improve multimodal transportation opportunities;

9. Maintain strong fiscal sustainability and continue to provide efficient and adequate public services;

10. Address new requirements of State law; and

11. Address emerging transportation, housing, and employment trends.

General Plan Buildout Summary
The EIR will evaluate the anticipated development that could occur within the Planning Area if every parcel developed at the densities and intensities expected under the General Plan. While no specific development projects are proposed as part of the Lawndale General Plan Update, the General Plan will accommodate future growth in Lawndale, including new businesses, expansion of existing businesses, and new residential uses. The buildout analysis assumes a 20-year planning horizon, and 2045 is to be the full buildout year of the General Plan (the point at which all parcels in the City are developed according to their General Plan land use designation).

Table 1 provides a statistical summary of the buildout potential associated with the Proposed Land Use Map compared to existing on-the-ground conditions and the currently adopted General Plan. Table 1 also shows the buildout potential associated with updated land uses within the Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan area.

NOP – City of Lawndale General Plan Update EIR
December 6, 2022 Page 5 of 5
Table 1 Buildout Statistical Summary
Description Housing Units Population
Non-Residential
Development
(Square Feet)
Jobs
Existing Conditions
HBSP 391 1,125 2,174,447 3,424
City 9,501 31,084 2,126,587 2,703
SOI 1,571 5,740 241,129 343
Total 11,463 38,948 4,542,162 8,470
Current Land Use Map
HBSP 1,331 3,620 2,063,401 4,125
City 10,338 28,746 2,541,429 3,763
SOI 1,717 6,286 446,149 829
Total 13,386 38,652 5,070,979 8,717
Proposed Land Use Map
HBSP 3,931 11,017 2,484,823 4,970
City 9,757 30,127 2,420,054 3,409
SOI 1,717 6,286 446,149 829
Total 15,405 47,430 5,351,026 9,208
HBSP – Hawthorne Boulevard Specific Plan Area
City – Development outside of the HBSP Area but within the City limits SOI – Sphere of Influence
Total – Planning Area
Notes:

1. The statistical summary is based a 20-year planning horizon and buildout year (the point at which all parcels in the City are developed according to their General Plan land use designation).

2. Numbers have been rounded and may not add exactly.

3. HBSP is located within the City limits.

Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The proposed Project could potentially affect the following environmental factors, and each will be addressed in the EIR:
• Aesthetics
• Air Quality
• Agriculture and Forestry Resources
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Energy
• Geology/Soils
• Greenhouse Gases Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
• Hydrology/Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Parks and Recreation
• Transportation and Traffic
• Tribal Cultural Resources
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfires
• Mandatory Findings of Significance
Attachments
• Figure 1: Regional Location Map
• Figure 2: Planning Area Map
• Figure 3: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
County Boundary
Sources: California State Geoportal.

Date: November 18, 2022.

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Figure 1.

Regional Location
Map
oL As nge el s C uo t n y r O ange Coun yt
Santa Monica
Beverly
Hills
West
Hollywood
El Segundo
Hawthorne
Culver City
Pasadena South
Pasadena
Alhambra
Monterey Park
Temple
City
Huntington
Park Bell
Bell
Gardens
Lynwood
Redondo
Beach
Lawndale
Torrance
Palos
Verdes
Estates
Lomita
Rolling
Hills Estates
Rolling Hills
Rancho Palos
Verdes
Gardena
Carson
Signal Hill
Lakewood
Artesia
Cerritos
Norwalk
Bellflower
Santa Fe
Springs
Paramount
South Gate Downey
Commerce
Montebello
Pico
Rivera
Los
Alamitos
Cypress
Inglewood
San
Gabriel
Vernon
Long Beach
Compton
Whittier
Los Angeles
Manhattan
Beach
Hermosa
Beach
Seal Beach
405
710
105
405
10 10
110
110
405
110 5
105
605
605
101
19 107
91 19
2 22
2 170
1 90
213
90 72
47 42
42 27
1 1
1 42
90 1
60 213
SAN

GABRIEL R

LOS ANGELES R
0 4 2
Miles
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
O
c
e
a n
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
Adjacent Inorporated Area
Sources: City of Lawndale; Los Angeles County.

Date: November 18, 2022.

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Figure 2.

Planning Area
Crenshaw Blvd
Prairie Ave
W Rosecrans Ave
Hawthorne Blvd
Prairie Ave
Inglewood Ave
Manhattan Beach Blvd
Rosecrans Ave
Redondo Beach Blvd
Yukon Ave
Marine Ave
Condon Ave
147th St
171st St
Ainsworth Ave
Jefferson Ave
W 168th St
S La C ien e g a Blvd
M cB a i n A ve
Cranbrook Ave
S Doty Ave
Gerkin Ave
S Shoup Ave
W 170th St
Bodger Ave
ev Kornblum A
Carnegie Ln
W 140th St
Vanderbilt Ln
165th St
144th St
W 162nd St Ramona Ave
163rd St
Prairie Ave
170th St
Doty Ave
Johnston Ave
Dow Ave
Kingsdale Ave
Mansel Ave
153rd St
S Lemoli Ave
Cerise Ave
156th St
W 152nd St
Robinson St
Perkins Ln
Felton Ln
W 145th St
Mackay Ln
Freeman Ave
Osage Ave
May Ave
W 157th St
Burin Ave
Grevillea Ave
Firmona Ave
W 154th St
Gates Ave
Graham Ave
Curtis Ave
Voorhees Ave
Ruhland Ave
Nelson Ave
144th Pl
173 rd S t
175th Pl
W 171st St
S Eriel Ave
W 163rd St
164th St
167th St
168th St
173rd Pl W 173rd St
W 166th St
W 142nd St
141st St
W 147th St
W 149th St
154th St
W 160th St
W 161st St
14 8 th S t
Lemoli Ave
166th St
Eastwood Ave
Chadron Ave
162nd St
Beland Blvd
W 159th St
Yukon Ave
160th St
Larch Ave
172nd St
Fo nth ill A ve
153rd Pl
W 146th St
161st St
Avis Ave
139th St
169th St
159th St
W 156th St
W 139th St
142nd St
S Ermanita Ave
S Faysmith Ave
1 4 7 th P l Roselle Ave
Cordary Ave
S Florwood Ave
W 153rd St
W 154th St
175th St
Pinckard Ave
Gibson Ln
405
Artesia Blvd
Mathews Ave
H a w t h o r n e
R e d o n d o B e a c h
G a r d e n a
To r ra n c e
0 1,000 500
Feet

CITY OF LAWNDALE

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
LEGEND
City of Lawndale
Sphere of Influence
Planning Area
Assessor Parcel
Boundary
Housing Overlay
Housing Overlay
Low Density Residential
Medium Density
Residential
High Density
Residential
Commercial
HBSP
Industrial
Open Space
Public Facilities
Sources: City of Lawndale; Los Angeles County.

Date: November 18, 2022.

Figure 3.

Proposed General Plan
Land Use Map
Crenshaw Blvd
Prairie Ave
W Rosecrans Ave
Hawthorne Blvd
Prairie Ave
Inglewood Ave
Manhattan Beach Blvd
Rosecrans Ave
Redondo Beach Blvd
Yukon Ave
Marine Ave
Condon Ave
147th St
171st St
Ainsworth Ave
Jefferson Ave
W 168th St
S La C ien e g a Blvd
M cB a i n A ve
Cranbrook Ave
S Doty Ave
Gerkin Ave
S Shoup Ave
W 170th St
Bodger Ave
ev Kornblum A
Carnegie Ln
W 140th St
Vanderbilt Ln
165th St
144th St
W 162nd St Ramona Ave
163rd St
Prairie Ave
170th St
Doty Ave
Johnston Ave
Dow Ave
Kingsdale Ave
Mansel Ave
153rd St
S Lemoli Ave
Cerise Ave
156th St
W 152nd St
Robinson St
Perkins Ln
Felton Ln
W 145th St
Mackay Ln
Freeman Ave
Osage Ave
May Ave
W 157th St
Burin Ave
Grevillea Ave
Firmona Ave
W 154th St
Gates Ave
Graham Ave
Curtis Ave
Voorhees Ave
Ruhland Ave
Nelson Ave
144th Pl
173 rd S t
175th Pl
W 171st St
S Eriel Ave
W 163rd St
164th St
167th St
168th St
173rd Pl W 173rd St
W 166th St
W 142nd St
141st St
W 147th St
W 149th St
154th St
W 160th St
W 161st St
14 8 th S t
Lemoli Ave
166th St
Eastwood Ave
Chadron Ave
162nd St
Beland Blvd
W 159th St
Yukon Ave
160th St
Larch Ave
172nd St
Fo nth ill A ve
153rd Pl
W 146th St
161st St
Avis Ave
139th St
169th St
159th St
W 156th St
W 139th St
142nd St
S Ermanita Ave
S Faysmith Ave
1 4 7 th P l Roselle Ave
Cordary Ave
S Florwood Ave
W 153rd St
W 154th St
175th St
Pinckard Ave
Gibson Ln
405
Artesia Blvd
Mathews Ave
0 1,000 500
Feet

December 28, 2022
Jared Chavez, Community Development Manager
City of Lawndale, Community Development Department
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, California 90260
Phone: (310) 973-3231
E-mail: [email protected]
RE: SCAG Comments on the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Lawndale General Plan Update [SCAG NO. IGR10798] Dear Jared Chavez,
Thank you for submitting the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Lawndale General Plan Update (“proposed project”) to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for review and comment. SCAG is responsible for providing informational resources to regionally significant plans, projects, and programs per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to facilitate the consistency of these projects with SCAG’s adopted regional plans, to be determined by the lead agencies.1 Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375, SCAG is the designated Regional Transportation Planning Agency under state law and is responsible for preparation of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) including the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). SCAG’s feedback is intended to assist local jurisdictions and project proponents to implement projects that have the potential to contribute to attainment of Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) goals and align with RTP/SCS policies. Finally, SCAG is the authorized regional agency for Intergovernmental Review (IGR) of programs proposed for Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development activities, pursuant to Presidential Executive Order 12372.

SCAG staff has reviewed the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Lawndale General Plan Update in Los Angeles County. The proposed project includes a comprehensive update to all the State-mandated elements and will address two optional topics: Economic Development and Community Facilities.

When available, please email environmental documentation to [email protected] providing, at a minimum, the full public comment period for review.

If you have any questions regarding the attached comments, please contact the Intergovernmental Review (IGR) Program, attn.: Annaleigh Ekman, Associate Regional Planner, at (213) 630-1427 or [email protected]. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Frank Wen, Ph.D.

Manager, Planning Strategy Department
1 Lead agencies such as local jurisdictions have the sole discretion in determining a local project’s consistency with the 2020 RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) for the purpose of determining consistency for CEQA.

December 28, 2022 SCAG No. IGR10798
Jared Chavez Page 2

COMMENTS ON THE NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE
LAWNDALE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE [SCAG NO. IGR10798]

CONSISTENCY WITH CONNECT SOCAL
SCAG provides informational resources to facilitate the consistency of the proposed project with the adopted 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS or Connect SoCal). For the purpose of determining consistency with CEQA, lead agencies such as local jurisdictions have the sole discretion in determining a local project’s consistency with Connect SoCal.

CONNECT SOCAL GOALS
The SCAG Regional Council fully adopted Connect SoCal in September 2020. Connect SoCal, also known as the 2020 – 2045 RTP/SCS, builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. The long-range visioning plan balances future mobility and housing needs with goals for the environment, the regional economy, social equity and environmental justice, and public health. The goals included in Connect SoCal may be pertinent to the proposed project.

These goals are meant to provide guidance for considering the proposed project. Among the relevant goals of Connect SoCal are the following:

SCAG CONNECT SOCAL GOALS
Goal #1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness Goal #2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability and travel safety for people and goods Goal #3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional transportation system Goal #4: Increase person and goods movement and travel choices within the transportation system Goal #5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality Goal #6: Support healthy and equitable communities
Goal #7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional development pattern and transportation network
Goal #8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data-driven solutions that result in more efficient travel Goal #9: Encourage development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options
Goal #10: Promote conservation of natural and agricultural lands and restoration of habitats For ease of review, we encourage the use of a side-by-side comparison of SCAG goals with discussions of the consistency, non-consistency or non-applicability of the goals and supportive analysis in a table format. Suggested format is as follows:

December 28, 2022 SCAG No. IGR10798
Jared Chavez Page 3

SCAG CONNECT SOCAL GOALS
Goal Analysis
Goal #1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness
Consistent: Statement as to why;
Not-Consistent: Statement as to why;
Or
Not Applicable: Statement as to why;
DEIR page number reference
Goal #2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability and travel safety for people and goods
Consistent: Statement as to why;
Not-Consistent: Statement as to why;
Or
Not Applicable: Statement as to why;
DEIR page number reference
etc. etc.

Connect SoCal Strategies
To achieve the goals of Connect SoCal, a wide range of land use and transportation strategies are included in the accompanying twenty (20) technical reports. Of particular note are multiple strategies included in Chapter 3 of Connect SoCal intended to support implementation of the regional Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) framed within the context of focusing growth near destinations and mobility options; promoting diverse housing choices; leveraging technology innovations; supporting implementation of sustainability policies; and promoting a Green Region. To view Connect SoCal and the accompanying technical reports, please visit the Connect SoCal webpage.

Connect SoCal builds upon the progress from previous RTP/SCS cycles and continues to focus on integrated, coordinated, and balanced planning for land use and transportation that helps the SCAG region strive towards a more sustainable region, while meeting statutory requirements pertinent to RTP/SCSs. These strategies within the regional context are provided as guidance for lead agencies such as local jurisdictions when the proposed project is under consideration.

SCAG staff would like to call your attention to resources available from SCAG’s Regional Climate Adaptation Framework including the Southern California Climate Adaptation Planning Guide, Communication and Outreach Toolkit, Library of Model Policies, and SB 379 Compliance Curriculum for Local Jurisdictions.

DEMOGRAPHICS AND GROWTH FORECASTS
A key, formative step in projecting future population, households, and employment through 2045 for Connect SoCal was the generation of a forecast of regional and county level growth in collaboration with expert demographers and economists on Southern California. From there, jurisdictional level forecasts were ground-truthed by subregions and local agencies, which helped SCAG identify opportunities and barriers to future development. This forecast helps the region understand, in a very general sense, where we are expected to grow, and allows SCAG to focus attention on areas that are experiencing change and may have increased transportation needs. After a year-long engagement effort with all 197 jurisdictions one-on-one, 82 percent of SCAG’s 197 jurisdictions provided feedback on the forecast of future growth for Connect SoCal. SCAG also sought feedback on potential sustainable growth strategies from a broad range of stakeholder groups – including local jurisdictions, county transportation commissions, other partner agencies, industry groups, community-based organizations, and the general public. Connect SoCal utilizes a bottomup approach in that total projected growth for each jurisdiction reflects feedback received from jurisdiction staff, including city managers, community development/planning directors, and local staff. Growth at the neighborhood level (i.e., transportation analysis zone (TAZ) reflects entitled projects and adheres to current general and specific plan maximum densities as conveyed by jurisdictions (except in cases where entitled projects and development agreements exceed these capacities as calculated by SCAG). Neighborhood level growth projections also feature strategies that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from automobiles and light trucks to achieve Southern California’s GHG reduction target, approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in accordance December 28, 2022 SCAG No. IGR10798
Jared Chavez Page 4
with state planning law. Connect SoCal’s Forecasted Development Pattern is utilized for long range modeling purposes and does not supersede actions taken by elected bodies on future development, including entitlements and development agreements. SCAG does not have the authority to implement the plan -- neither through decisions about what type of development is built where, nor what transportation projects are ultimately built, as Connect SoCal is adopted at the jurisdictional level. Achieving a sustained regional outcome depends upon informed and intentional local action. To access jurisdictional level growth estimates and forecasts for years 2016 and 2045, please refer to the Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report. The growth forecasts for the region and applicable jurisdictions are below.

Adopted SCAG Region Wide Forecasts Adopted City of Lawndale Forecasts Year 2020 Year 2030 Year 2035 Year 2045 Year 2020 Year 2030 Year 2035 Year 2045 Population 19,517,731 20,821,171 21,443,006 22,503,899 33,593 33,896 34,066 34,410 Households 6,333,458 6,902,821 7,170,110 7,633,451 9,833 9,987 10,059 10,202 Employment 8,695,427 9,303,627 9,566,384 10,048,822 7,512 7,782 7,918 8,311

MITIGATION MEASURES
SCAG staff recommends that you review the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) for Connect SoCal for guidance, as appropriate. SCAG’s Regional Council certified the PEIR and adopted the associated Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (FOF/SOC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) on May 7, 2020 and also adopted a PEIR Addendum and amended the MMRP on September 3, 2020 (please see the PEIR webpage and scroll to the bottom of the page for the PEIR Addendum). The PEIR includes a list of project-level performance standards-based mitigation measures that may be considered for adoption and implementation by lead, responsible, or trustee agencies in the region, as applicable and feasible. Project-level mitigation measures are within responsibility, authority, and/or jurisdiction of project-implementing agency or other public agency serving as lead agency under CEQA in subsequent project- and site- specific design, CEQA review, and decision-making processes, to meet the performance standards for each of the CEQA resource categories.

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE
Per Senate Bill 1000 (SB 1000), local jurisdictions in California with disadvantaged communities are required to develop an Environmental Justice (EJ) Element or consider EJ goals, policies, and objectives in their General Plans when updating two or more General Plan Elements. SCAG staff recommends that you review the Environmental Justice Technical Report and the updated Environmental Justice Toolbox, which is a resource document to assist local jurisdictions in developing EJ-related goals and policies regarding solutions for EJ-related community issues.

SENT VIA E-MAIL: January 5, 2023
[email protected]
Jared Chavez, Community Development Manager
City of Lawndale
Community Development
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, California 90260
Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the City of Lawndale General Plan Update
South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document. Our comments are recommendations on the analysis of potential air quality impacts from the Proposed Project that should be included in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Please send a copy of the EIR upon its completion and public release directly to South Coast AQMD as copies of the EIR submitted to the State Clearinghouse are not forwarded. In addition, please send all appendices and technical documents related to the air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas analyses and electronic versions of all emission calculation spreadsheets, and air quality modeling and health risk assessment input and output files (not PDF files). Any delays in providing all supporting documentation for our review will require additional review time beyond the end of the comment period.

CEQA Air Quality Analysis
Staff recommends that the Lead Agency use South Coast AQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook and website1as guidance when preparing the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses. It is also recommended that the Lead Agency use the CalEEMod2land use emissions software, which can estimate pollutant emissions from typical land use development and is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association.

South Coast AQMD has developed both regional and localized significance thresholds. South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency quantify criteria pollutant emissions and compare the emissions to South Coast AQMD’s CEQA regional pollutant emissions significance thresholds3and localized significance thresholds (LSTs)4to determine the Proposed Project’s air quality impacts. The localized analysis can be conducted by either using the LST screening tables or performing dispersion modeling.

The Lead Agency should identify any potential adverse air quality impacts that could occur from all phases of the Proposed Project and all air pollutant sources related to the Proposed Project. Air quality impacts from both construction (including demolition, if any) and operations should be calculated.

Construction-related air quality impacts typically include, but are not limited to, emissions from the use of 1 South Coast AQMD’s CEQA Handbook and other resources for preparing air quality analyses can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook. 2 CalEEMod is available free of charge at: www.caleemod.com. 3 South Coast AQMD’s CEQA regional pollutant emissions significance thresholds can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf. 4 South Coast AQMD’s guidance for performing a localized air quality analysis can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/localized-significance-thresholds.

Jared Chavez 2 January 5, 2023
heavy-duty equipment from grading, earth-loading/unloading, paving, architectural coatings, off-road mobile sources (e.g., heavy-duty construction equipment) and on-road mobile sources (e.g., construction worker vehicle trips, material transport trips, and hauling trips). Operation-related air quality impacts may include, but are not limited to, emissions from stationary sources (e.g., boilers and air pollution control devices), area sources (e.g., solvents and coatings), and vehicular trips (e.g., on- and off-road tailpipe emissions and entrained dust). Air quality impacts from indirect sources, such as sources that generate or attract vehicular trips, should be included in the analysis. Furthermore, emissions from the overlapping construction and operational activities should be combined and compared to South Coast AQMD’s regional air quality CEQA operational thresholds to determine the level of significance.

If the Proposed Project generates diesel emissions from long-term construction or attracts diesel-fueled vehicular trips, especially heavy-duty diesel-fueled vehicles, it is recommended that the Lead Agency perform a mobile source health risk assessment5.

Sensitive receptors are people that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants and include schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, elderly care facilities, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. The Proposed Project will include, among others, many high, medium, and low density residential areas and is located in close proximity to I-405 freeway, and to facilitate the purpose of an EIR as an informational document, it is recommended that the Lead Agency perform a mobile source health risk assessment5to disclose the potential health risks6.

In the event that implementation of the Proposed Project requires a permit from South Coast AQMD, South Coast AQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the Draft EIR. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the EIR will be the basis for evaluating the permit under CEQA and imposing permit conditions and limits. Questions on permits should be directed to South Coast AQMD’s Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-3385.

The California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective7is a general reference guide for evaluating and reducing air pollution impacts associated with new projects that go through the land use decision-making process with additional guidance on strategies to reduce air pollution exposure near high-volume roadways available in CARB’s technical advisory8.

The South Coast AQMD’s Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning9includes suggested policies that local governments can use in their General Plans or through local planning to prevent or reduce potential air pollution impacts and protect public health. It is recommended that the Lead Agency review this Guidance Document as a tool when making local planning and land use decisions.

South Coast AQMD staff is concerned about potential public health impacts of siting industrial use area (including warehouses and distribution center) within close proximity of sensitive land uses, especially in communities that are already heavily affected by the existing warehouse and truck activities. The South Coast AQMD’s Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study (MATES V), completed in August 2021, concluded 5 South Coast AQMD’s guidance for performing a mobile source health risk assessment can be found at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. 6 Ibid.
7 CARB’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective can be found at:
http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf.
8 CARB’s technical advisory can be found at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm. 9 South Coast AQMD. 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning.

Available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf.

Jared Chavez 3 January 5, 2023
that the largest contributor to cancer risk from air pollution is diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions10.

According to the MATES V Carcinogenic Risk interactive Map, the area surrounding the Proposed Project has an estimated cancer risk over 450 in one million11. Operation of warehouses generates and attracts heavy-duty diesel-fueled trucks that emit DPM. When the health impacts from the Proposed Project are added to those existing impacts, residents living in the communities surrounding the Proposed Project will possibly face an even greater exposure to air pollution and bear a disproportionate burden of increasing health risks.

Mitigation Measures
In the event that the Proposed Project results in significant adverse air quality impacts, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized to minimize these impacts. Any impacts resulting from mitigation measures must also be analyzed. Several resources to assist the Lead Agency with identifying potential mitigation measures for the Proposed Project include South Coast AQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook,12 South Coast AQMD’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan, 13 and Southern California Association of
Government’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy.
14 .

Mitigation measures for operational air quality impacts from mobile sources that the Lead Agency should consider in the Draft EIR may include the following:
• Require zero-emissions (ZE) or near-zero emission (NZE) on-road haul trucks such as heavyduty trucks with natural gas engines that meet the CARB’s adopted optional NOx emissions standard at 0.02 grams per brake horsepower-hour (g/bhp-hr), if and when feasible. Given the state’s clean truck rules and regulations aiming to accelerate the utilization and market penetration of ZE and NZE trucks such as the Advanced Clean Trucks Rule15 and the HeavyDuty Low NOx Omnibus Regulation16, ZE and NZE trucks will become increasingly more available to use. The Lead Agency should require a phase-in schedule to incentive the use of these cleaner operating trucks to reduce any significant adverse air quality impacts. South Coast AQMD staff is available to discuss the availability of current and upcoming truck technologies and incentive programs with the Lead Agency. At a minimum, require the use of 2010 model year17 that meet CARB’s 2010 engine emissions standards at 0.01 g/bhp-hr of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 g/bhp-hr of NOx emissions or newer, cleaner trucks. Include environmental 10 South Coast AQMD. August 2021. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin V. Available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-studies/health-studies/mates-v. 11 South Coast AQMD. MATES V Data Visualization Tool. Accessed at: MATES Data Visualization (arcgis.com). 12 https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook 13 South Coast AQMD’s 2022 Air Quality Management Plan can be found at: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/cleanair-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan (Chapter 4 - Control Strategy and Implementation). 14 Southern California Association of Governments’ 2020-2045 RTP/SCS can be found at:
https://www.connectsocal.org/Documents/PEIR/certified/Exhibit-A_ConnectSoCal_PEIR.pdf. 15 CARB. June 25, 2020. Advanced Clean Trucks Rule. Accessed at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/advanced-cleantrucks. 16 CARB has recently passed a variety of new regulations that require new, cleaner heavy-duty truck technology to be sold and used in state. For example, on August 27, 2020, CARB approved the Heavy-Duty Low NOx Omnibus Regulation, which will require all trucks to meet the adopted emission standard of 0.05 g/hp-hr starting with engine model year 2024. Accessed at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/rulemaking/2020/hdomnibuslownox. 17 CARB adopted the statewide Truck and Bus Regulation in 2010. The Regulation requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in California to be upgraded to reduce emissions. Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses will need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent. More information on the CARB’s Truck and Bus Regulation is available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm.

Jared Chavez 4 January 5, 2023
analyses to evaluate and identify sufficient electricity and supportive infrastructures in the Energy and Utilities and Service Systems Sections in the CEQA document, where appropriate. Include the requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards, and make the records available for inspection. The Lead Agency should conduct regular inspections to the maximum extent feasible to ensure compliance. • Limit the daily number of trucks allowed at the Proposed Project to levels analyzed in the Final CEQA document. If higher daily truck volumes are anticipated to visit the site, the Lead Agency should commit to re-evaluating the Proposed Project through CEQA prior to allowing this higher activity level.
• Provide electric vehicle (EV) charging stations or at a minimum, provide the electrical infrastructure and electrical panels should be appropriately sized. Electrical hookups should be provided for truckers to plug in any onboard auxiliary equipment.

Mitigation measures for operational air quality impacts from other area sources that the Lead Agency should consider in the Draft EIR may include the following:
• Maximize use of solar energy by installing solar energy arrays. • Use light colored paving and roofing materials.
• Utilize only Energy Star heating, cooling, and lighting devices, and appliances. • Use of water-based or low VOC cleaning products that go beyond the requirements of South Coast AQMD Rule 1113.

Design considerations for the Proposed Project that the Lead Agency should consider to further reduce air quality and health risk impacts include the following:
• Clearly mark truck routes with trailblazer signs, so that trucks will not travel next to or near sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, day care centers, etc.). • Design the Proposed Project such that truck entrances and exits are not facing sensitive receptors and trucks will not travel past sensitive land uses to enter or leave the Proposed Project site. • Design the Proposed Project such that any check-in point for trucks is inside the Proposed Project site to ensure that there are no trucks queuing outside. • Design the Proposed Project to ensure that truck traffic inside the Proposed Project site is as far away as feasible from sensitive receptors.
• Restrict overnight truck parking in sensitive land uses by providing overnight truck parking inside the Proposed Project site.

On May 7, 2021, South Coast AQMD’s Governing Board adopted Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program, and Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305. Rules 2305 and 316 are new rules that will reduce regional and local emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM), including diesel PM. These emission reductions will reduce public health impacts for communities located near warehouses from mobile sources that are associated with warehouse activities. Also, the emission reductions will help the region attain federal and state ambient air quality standards. Rule 2305 applies to owners and operators of warehouses greater than or equal to 100,000 square feet. Under Rule 2305, operators are subject to an annual WAIRE Points Compliance Obligation that is calculated based on the annual number of truck trips to the warehouse.

WAIRE Points can be earned by implementing actions in a prescribed menu in Rule 2305, implementing a site-specific custom plan, or paying a mitigation fee. Warehouse owners are only required to submit limited information reports, but they can opt in to earn Points on behalf of their tenants if they so choose because certain actions to reduce emissions may be better achieved at the warehouse development phase, for instance the installation of solar and charging infrastructure. Rule 316 is a companion fee rule for Rule Jared Chavez 5 January 5, 2023
2305 to allow South Coast AQMD to recover costs associated with Rule 2305 compliance activities. If the Proposed Project consists of the development of warehouses, the Proposed Project’s warehouse owners and operators will be required to comply with Rule 2305 once the warehouse is occupied.

Therefore, South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review South Coast AQMD Rule 2305 to determine the potential WAIRE Points Compliance Obligation for future operators and explore whether additional project requirements and CEQA mitigation measures can be identified and implemented at the Proposed Project that may help future warehouse operators meet their compliance obligation18. South Coast AQMD staff is available to answer questions concerning Rule 2305 implementation and compliance by phone or email at (909) 396-3140 or [email protected]. For implementation guidance documents and compliance and reporting tools, please visit South Coast AQMD’s WAIRE Program webpage19.

Health Risk Reduction Strategies
Many strategies are available to reduce exposures, including, but are not limited to, building filtration systems with MERV 13 or better, or in some cases, MERV 15 or better is recommended; building design, orientation, location; vegetation barriers or landscaping screening, etc. Enhanced filtration units are capable of reducing exposures. However, enhanced filtration systems have limitations. For example, in a study that South Coast AQMD conducted to investigate filters20, a cost burden is expected to be within the range of $120 to $240 per year to replace each filter panel. The initial start-up cost could substantially increase if an HVAC system needs to be installed and if standalone filter units are required. Installation costs may vary and include costs for conducting site assessments and obtaining permits and approvals before filters can be installed. Other costs may include filter life monitoring, annual maintenance, and training for conducting maintenance and reporting. In addition, because the filters would not have any effectiveness unless the HVAC system is running, there may be increased energy consumption that the Lead Agency should evaluate in the EIR. It is typically assumed that the filters operate 100 percent of the time while residents are indoors, and the environmental analysis does not generally account for the times when the residents have their windows or doors open or are in common space areas of the project. These filters have no ability to filter out any toxic gases. Furthermore, when used filters are replaced, replacement has the potential to result in emissions from the transportation of used filters at disposal sites and generate solid waste that the Lead Agency should evaluate in the EIR. Therefore, the presumed effectiveness and feasibility of any filtration units should be carefully evaluated in more detail prior to assuming that they will sufficiently alleviate exposures to diesel particulate matter emissions.

South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to ensure that air quality, greenhouse gas, and health risk impacts from the Proposed Project are accurately evaluated and mitigated where feasible. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Sam Wang
Sam Wang
Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR
Planning, Rule Development & Implementation
18 South Coast AQMD Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xxiii/r2305.pdf. 19 South Coast AQMD WAIRE Program. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/waire. 20 This study evaluated filters rated MERV 13 or better. Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/aqmdpilotstudyfinalreport.pdf. Also see 2012 Peer Review Journal article by South Coast AQMD:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ina.12013.

Jared Chavez
6 January 5, 2023
SW
LAC221213-07
Control Number
From: Rick Hinojos
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jared Chavez
Subject: Re: City of Lawndale General Plan Update: Notice of Preparation of an EIR Date: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 11:19:26 AM
Thank you for the file, but the current general plan land use map was not included so that the proposed changes can be more objectively and immediately reviewed. Can a revised version that includes that map be distributed so that changes are more opaque to our neighbors? On Tue, Dec 6, 2022, 11:12 <[email protected]> wrote:

The City of Lawndale will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Lawndale General Plan Update (Project) to address the environmental impacts associated with the Project at a programmatic level. The proposed Project is a long-term plan consisting of policies that will guide future development activities and City actions. No specific development projects are proposed as part of this General Plan Update. However, the program EIR can serve to streamline environmental review of future projects.

The City, as Lead Agency, requests that responsible and trustee agencies, all interested parties, and the Office of Planning and Research, respond in a manner consistent with § 15082(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) has been prepared and released to advise and solicit comments and suggestions regarding the scope and content of the EIR to be prepared for the proposed Project. The NOP public review period will begin on Tuesday, December 6, 2022 and end on Thursday, January 5, 2023. Comments in response to this notice must be submitted to the address below, or by email by the close of the NOP review period, which is 5:00 PM on Thursday, January 5, 2023:

Jared Chavez - Community Development Manager
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260
Email: [email protected]
Regards,
Ashley Brodkin | Senior Planner
De Novo Planning Group | www.denovoplanning.com
[email protected] | 714-440-0273
Southern California | 180 East Main St #108 | Tustin, CA 92780 Northern California | 1020 Suncast Ln #106 | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 Appendix B: Air Quality, Energy and Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Modeling Data

Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 1 / 293
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated

3.7. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 2 / 293

3.9. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated

3.11. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated

3.13. Demolition (2029) - Unmitigated

3.15. Demolition (2030) - Unmitigated

3.17. Demolition (2031) - Unmitigated

3.19. Demolition (2032) - Unmitigated

3.21. Demolition (2033) - Unmitigated

3.23. Demolition (2034) - Unmitigated

3.25. Demolition (2035) - Unmitigated

3.27. Demolition (2036) - Unmitigated

3.29. Demolition (2037) - Unmitigated

3.31. Demolition (2038) - Unmitigated

3.33. Demolition (2039) - Unmitigated

3.35. Demolition (2040) - Unmitigated

3.37. Demolition (2041) - Unmitigated

3.39. Demolition (2042) - Unmitigated

3.41. Demolition (2043) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 3 / 293

3.43. Demolition (2044) - Unmitigated

3.45. Demolition (2045) - Unmitigated

3.47. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.49. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.51. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.53. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.55. Site Preparation (2027) - Unmitigated

3.57. Site Preparation (2028) - Unmitigated

3.59. Site Preparation (2029) - Unmitigated

3.61. Site Preparation (2030) - Unmitigated

3.63. Site Preparation (2031) - Unmitigated

3.65. Site Preparation (2032) - Unmitigated

3.67. Site Preparation (2033) - Unmitigated

3.69. Site Preparation (2034) - Unmitigated

3.71. Site Preparation (2035) - Unmitigated

3.73. Site Preparation (2036) - Unmitigated

3.75. Site Preparation (2037) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 4 / 293

3.77. Site Preparation (2038) - Unmitigated

3.79. Site Preparation (2039) - Unmitigated

3.81. Site Preparation (2040) - Unmitigated

3.83. Site Preparation (2041) - Unmitigated

3.85. Site Preparation (2042) - Unmitigated

3.87. Site Preparation (2043) - Unmitigated

3.89. Site Preparation (2044) - Unmitigated

3.91. Site Preparation (2045) - Unmitigated

3.93. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.95. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.97. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated

3.99. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.101. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated

3.103. Grading (2028) - Unmitigated

3.105. Grading (2029) - Unmitigated

3.107. Grading (2030) - Unmitigated

3.109. Grading (2031) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 5 / 293

3.111. Grading (2032) - Unmitigated

3.113. Grading (2033) - Unmitigated

3.115. Grading (2034) - Unmitigated

3.117. Grading (2035) - Unmitigated

3.119. Grading (2036) - Unmitigated

3.121. Grading (2037) - Unmitigated

3.123. Grading (2038) - Unmitigated

3.125. Grading (2039) - Unmitigated

3.127. Grading (2040) - Unmitigated

3.129. Grading (2041) - Unmitigated

3.131. Grading (2042) - Unmitigated

3.133. Grading (2043) - Unmitigated

3.135. Grading (2044) - Unmitigated

3.137. Grading (2045) - Unmitigated

3.139. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.141. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.143. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 6 / 293

3.145. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.147. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.149. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated

3.151. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated

3.153. Building Construction (2030) - Unmitigated

3.155. Building Construction (2031) - Unmitigated

3.157. Building Construction (2032) - Unmitigated

3.159. Building Construction (2033) - Unmitigated

3.161. Building Construction (2034) - Unmitigated

3.163. Building Construction (2035) - Unmitigated

3.165. Building Construction (2036) - Unmitigated

3.167. Building Construction (2037) - Unmitigated

3.169. Building Construction (2038) - Unmitigated

3.171. Building Construction (2039) - Unmitigated

3.173. Building Construction (2040) - Unmitigated

3.175. Building Construction (2041) - Unmitigated

3.177. Building Construction (2042) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 7 / 293

3.179. Building Construction (2043) - Unmitigated

3.181. Building Construction (2044) - Unmitigated

3.183. Building Construction (2045) - Unmitigated

3.185. Paving (2023) - Unmitigated

3.187. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.189. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated

3.191. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.193. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.195. Paving (2028) - Unmitigated

3.197. Paving (2029) - Unmitigated

3.199. Paving (2030) - Unmitigated

3.201. Paving (2031) - Unmitigated

3.203. Paving (2032) - Unmitigated

3.205. Paving (2033) - Unmitigated

3.207. Paving (2034) - Unmitigated

3.209. Paving (2035) - Unmitigated

3.211. Paving (2036) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 8 / 293

3.213. Paving (2037) - Unmitigated

3.215. Paving (2038) - Unmitigated

3.217. Paving (2039) - Unmitigated

3.219. Paving (2040) - Unmitigated

3.221. Paving (2041) - Unmitigated

3.223. Paving (2042) - Unmitigated

3.225. Paving (2043) - Unmitigated

3.227. Paving (2044) - Unmitigated

3.229. Paving (2045) - Unmitigated

3.231. Architectural Coating (2023) - Unmitigated

3.233. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.235. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.237. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

3.239. Architectural Coating (2027) - Unmitigated

3.241. Architectural Coating (2028) - Unmitigated

3.243. Architectural Coating (2029) - Unmitigated

3.245. Architectural Coating (2030) - Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 9 / 293

3.247. Architectural Coating (2031) - Unmitigated

3.249. Architectural Coating (2032) - Unmitigated

3.251. Architectural Coating (2033) - Unmitigated

3.253. Architectural Coating (2034) - Unmitigated

3.255. Architectural Coating (2035) - Unmitigated

3.257. Architectural Coating (2036) - Unmitigated

3.259. Architectural Coating (2037) - Unmitigated

3.261. Architectural Coating (2038) - Unmitigated

3.263. Architectural Coating (2039) - Unmitigated

3.265. Architectural Coating (2040) - Unmitigated

3.267. Architectural Coating (2041) - Unmitigated

3.269. Architectural Coating (2042) - Unmitigated

3.271. Architectural Coating (2043) - Unmitigated

3.273. Architectural Coating (2044) - Unmitigated

3.275. Architectural Coating (2045) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 10 / 293

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 11 / 293

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 12 / 293

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 13 / 293

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 14 / 293

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 15 / 293

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Lawndale General Plan Update
Construction Start Date 10/1/2023
Operational Year 2045
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Plan/community
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.20
Precipitation (days) 17.8
Location 33.88757771544401, -118.3536468469073
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Lawndale
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4562
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 16 / 293
Single Family
Housing
14,832 Dwelling Unit 824 28,922,400 173,725,095 0.00 43,903 Assume Single-family for
residential (for
simplicity). Also
assumes average
density (18 units per
acre)
Strip Mall 2,439 1000sqft 56.0 2,439,360 0.00 0.00 — Assumes retail "strip mall" land use type
(for simplicity)
General Light
Industry

50.0 1000sqft 21.0 50,000 0.00 0.00 — Assumes industrial "general light
industry" land use
type (for simplicity)
City Park 13.0 Acre 13.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 — Assumes
recreational "City
Park" land use type
(for simplicity)
Library 6,011 1000sqft 138 6,011,280 0.00 0.00 — Assumes educational "Library" land use
type (for simplicity)
General Office
Building
4,138 1000sqft 95.0 4,138,200 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 17 / 293
Unmit. 83.6 121 312 1,087 1.00 6.67 189 196 6.27 45.6 51.9 — 307,562 307,562 12.6 22.1 991 315,467 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 91.6 125 351 1,025 1.00 7.25 189 196 6.80 45.6 52.4 — 304,008 304,008 13.2 22.4 27.4 311,042 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 59.3 85.9 236 707 0.72 4.78 134 139 4.49 32.3 36.8 — 215,650 215,650 9.25 16.0 306 220,970 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 10.8 15.7 43.0 129 0.13 0.87 24.4 25.3 0.82 5.89 6.71 — 35,703 35,703 1.53 2.66 50.7 36,584

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 83.6 121 312 1,087 1.00 6.67 189 196 6.27 45.6 51.9 — 307,562 307,562 12.6 22.1 991 315,467 2025 79.0 117 286 1,006 1.00 5.97 189 195 4.80 45.6 50.4 — 302,074 302,074 12.6 22.1 928 309,916 2026 70.8 110 267 939 1.00 5.57 189 194 4.44 45.6 50.0 — 296,718 296,718 12.3 22.1 861 304,485 2027 67.9 108 253 880 1.00 4.49 189 193 4.19 45.6 49.8 — 291,385 291,385 12.3 21.3 791 298,836 2028 66.0 105 244 834 1.00 4.30 189 193 4.02 45.6 49.6 — 285,913 285,913 6.30 21.2 725 293,124 2029 64.1 103 228 786 1.00 4.09 189 193 3.83 45.6 49.4 — 280,336 280,336 6.22 21.2 661 287,482 2030 56.4 101 216 746 1.00 3.98 189 193 3.73 45.6 49.3 — 274,707 274,707 6.22 20.4 603 281,549 2031 54.3 94.2 208 704 1.00 3.89 189 193 3.64 45.6 49.2 — 269,019 269,019 5.87 15.5 549 274,333 2032 52.1 92.5 194 665 1.00 3.59 189 192 3.36 45.6 48.9 — 263,615 263,615 5.87 14.7 499 268,634 2033 50.7 91.2 187 632 1.00 3.38 189 192 3.18 45.6 48.8 — 258,382 258,382 5.87 14.7 454 263,356 2034 43.4 89.7 176 602 1.00 3.23 189 192 3.04 45.6 48.6 — 253,461 253,461 5.05 13.9 413 258,129 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 18 / 293
2035 42.3 88.6 170 576 1.00 3.01 189 192 2.83 45.6 48.4 — 248,882 248,882 4.70 13.9 275 253,403 2036 41.3 87.7 163 551 1.00 2.82 189 192 2.66 45.6 48.2 — 244,775 244,775 4.70 13.0 236 249,012 2037 40.2 86.5 161 533 1.00 2.79 189 192 2.64 45.6 48.2 — 241,022 241,022 4.70 13.0 201 245,224 2038 38.9 85.4 155 516 1.00 2.63 189 191 2.48 45.6 48.1 — 237,854 237,854 4.62 12.2 171 241,779 2039 38.0 84.8 146 503 1.00 2.55 189 191 2.41 45.6 48.0 — 234,868 234,868 4.62 12.2 144 238,766 2040 36.8 83.6 145 491 1.00 2.52 189 191 2.38 45.6 48.0 — 232,207 232,207 4.36 12.2 121 236,075 2041 34.9 77.7 139 478 1.00 2.34 189 191 2.22 45.6 47.8 — 229,853 229,853 4.28 11.9 102 233,621 2042 34.2 77.1 137 465 1.00 2.29 189 191 2.17 45.6 47.8 — 227,772 227,772 4.28 11.1 86.2 231,279 2043 33.6 76.6 136 459 1.00 2.26 189 191 2.14 45.6 47.7 — 225,944 225,944 4.28 11.1 72.9 229,438 2044 33.4 76.3 133 451 1.00 2.12 189 191 2.02 45.6 47.6 — 224,357 224,357 4.28 11.1 61.8 227,840 2045 32.7 75.4 131 450 1.00 2.09 189 191 1.99 45.6 47.6 — 222,970 222,970 3.37 11.1 52.3 226,421 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 91.6 125 351 1,025 1.00 7.25 189 196 6.80 45.6 52.4 — 304,008 304,008 13.2 22.4 27.4 311,042 2024 83.0 120 328 947 1.00 6.67 189 196 6.27 45.6 51.9 — 298,717 298,717 12.9 22.4 25.7 305,743 2025 78.4 117 298 879 1.00 5.97 189 195 4.80 45.6 50.4 — 293,437 293,437 12.9 22.4 24.1 300,461 2026 70.6 109 279 826 1.00 5.57 189 194 4.44 45.6 50.0 — 288,284 288,284 12.6 22.1 22.3 295,219 2027 67.2 107 268 770 1.00 4.49 189 193 4.19 45.6 49.8 — 283,124 283,124 7.65 21.3 20.5 289,689 2028 65.6 105 254 732 1.00 4.30 189 193 4.02 45.6 49.6 — 277,816 277,816 6.56 21.3 18.8 284,352 2029 58.4 102 239 689 1.00 4.09 189 193 3.83 45.6 49.4 — 272,397 272,397 6.48 21.3 17.2 278,929 2030 55.7 101 226 653 1.00 3.98 189 193 3.73 45.6 49.3 — 266,911 266,911 6.22 20.4 15.6 273,166 2031 53.5 93.8 218 620 1.00 3.89 189 193 3.64 45.6 49.2 — 261,361 261,361 6.14 20.4 14.2 267,613 2032 51.7 92.1 204 585 1.00 3.59 189 192 3.36 45.6 48.9 — 256,070 256,070 6.14 14.7 12.9 260,610 2033 50.0 90.5 192 557 1.00 3.38 189 192 3.18 45.6 48.8 — 250,950 250,950 5.87 14.7 11.8 255,483 2034 43.0 89.2 186 531 1.00 3.23 189 192 3.04 45.6 48.6 — 246,124 246,124 5.05 13.9 10.7 250,389 2035 41.8 88.1 179 509 1.00 3.01 189 192 2.83 45.6 48.4 — 241,629 241,629 4.97 13.9 7.12 245,889 2036 41.2 87.6 168 488 1.00 2.82 189 192 2.66 45.6 48.2 — 237,595 237,595 4.97 13.0 6.10 241,609 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 19 / 293
2037 40.0 86.7 165 470 1.00 2.79 189 192 2.64 45.6 48.2 — 233,906 233,906 4.70 13.0 5.20 237,912 2038 38.9 85.5 159 453 1.00 2.63 189 191 2.48 45.6 48.1 — 230,783 230,783 4.62 12.2 4.42 234,541 2039 37.8 84.6 155 439 1.00 2.55 189 191 2.41 45.6 48.0 — 227,847 227,847 4.62 12.2 3.73 231,604 2040 36.3 83.2 153 432 1.00 2.52 189 191 2.38 45.6 48.0 — 225,235 225,235 4.62 12.2 3.13 228,992 2041 34.9 77.5 144 423 1.00 2.34 189 191 2.22 45.6 47.8 — 222,921 222,921 4.54 12.2 2.64 226,675 2042 34.0 76.6 142 410 1.00 2.29 189 191 2.17 45.6 47.8 — 220,875 220,875 4.54 11.4 2.24 224,384 2043 33.7 76.7 140 404 1.00 2.26 189 191 2.14 45.6 47.7 — 219,081 219,081 4.54 11.4 1.89 222,590 2044 33.2 75.9 137 400 1.00 2.12 189 191 2.02 45.6 47.6 — 217,520 217,520 4.19 11.4 1.60 221,020 2045 32.2 75.3 136 395 1.00 2.09 189 191 1.99 45.6 47.6 — 216,159 216,159 3.37 11.4 1.35 219,638 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 16.5 22.4 63.3 192 0.18 1.30 33.6 34.9 1.22 8.11 9.34 — 55,172 55,172 2.37 4.03 82.3 56,515 2024 59.3 85.9 236 707 0.72 4.78 134 139 4.49 32.3 36.8 — 215,650 215,650 9.25 16.0 306 220,970 2025 55.8 83.3 217 653 0.72 4.26 133 138 3.43 32.2 35.6 — 211,249 211,249 9.23 15.8 287 216,479 2026 50.3 77.9 203 612 0.72 3.98 133 137 3.17 32.2 35.4 — 207,525 207,525 8.98 15.8 266 212,728 2027 48.1 76.3 192 572 0.72 3.20 133 137 3.00 32.2 35.2 — 203,807 203,807 5.47 15.2 244 208,725 2028 46.9 74.8 182 543 0.72 3.08 134 137 2.88 32.3 35.1 — 200,534 200,534 4.70 15.3 224 205,426 2029 41.6 73.0 171 511 0.72 2.92 133 136 2.73 32.2 34.9 — 196,083 196,083 4.63 15.2 204 200,924 2030 39.7 71.7 161 485 0.72 2.84 133 136 2.66 32.2 34.8 — 192,136 192,136 4.44 14.6 186 196,778 2031 38.5 67.1 156 458 0.72 2.78 133 136 2.60 32.2 34.8 — 188,146 188,146 4.38 14.6 169 192,771 2032 37.1 65.8 146 435 0.72 2.57 134 136 2.41 32.3 34.7 — 184,847 184,847 4.40 14.0 154 189,293 2033 35.8 64.7 140 413 0.72 2.42 133 136 2.27 32.2 34.5 — 180,663 180,663 4.19 10.5 140 184,032 2034 30.6 63.6 133 391 0.72 2.31 133 136 2.17 32.2 34.4 — 177,198 177,198 3.61 9.90 128 180,364 2035 30.0 63.0 128 376 0.72 2.15 133 136 2.02 32.2 34.2 — 173,972 173,972 3.55 9.90 84.6 177,095 2036 29.4 62.6 120 362 0.72 2.02 134 136 1.91 32.3 34.2 — 171,542 171,542 3.56 9.33 72.9 174,485 2037 28.6 61.7 118 348 0.72 2.00 133 135 1.88 32.2 34.1 — 168,427 168,427 3.36 9.31 61.9 171,347 2038 27.8 61.0 113 336 0.72 1.88 133 135 1.77 32.2 34.0 — 166,189 166,189 3.30 8.72 52.6 168,923 2039 27.1 60.3 111 326 0.72 1.82 133 135 1.72 32.2 33.9 — 164,078 164,078 3.30 8.72 44.3 166,803 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 20 / 293
2040 26.1 59.7 110 322 0.72 1.80 134 136 1.70 32.3 34.0 — 162,649 162,649 3.31 8.74 37.4 165,375 2041 24.7 55.3 102 311 0.72 1.67 133 135 1.59 32.2 33.8 — 160,544 160,544 3.24 8.72 31.4 163,256 2042 24.2 54.9 101 306 0.72 1.63 133 135 1.55 32.2 33.7 — 159,076 159,076 3.24 8.13 26.6 161,607 2043 24.2 54.8 100 301 0.72 1.61 133 135 1.53 32.2 33.7 — 157,787 157,787 3.05 8.13 22.5 160,310 2044 23.7 54.4 97.9 296 0.72 1.52 134 135 1.44 32.3 33.7 — 157,098 157,098 3.06 8.16 19.1 159,624 2045 23.1 53.8 96.5 295 0.72 1.50 133 135 1.42 32.2 33.6 — 155,692 155,692 2.41 8.13 16.1 158,192 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 3.00 4.08 11.6 35.0 0.03 0.24 6.14 6.37 0.22 1.48 1.70 — 9,134 9,134 0.39 0.67 13.6 9,357 2024 10.8 15.7 43.0 129 0.13 0.87 24.4 25.3 0.82 5.89 6.71 — 35,703 35,703 1.53 2.66 50.7 36,584 2025 10.2 15.2 39.5 119 0.13 0.78 24.3 25.1 0.63 5.87 6.50 — 34,975 34,975 1.53 2.62 47.5 35,841 2026 9.18 14.2 37.0 112 0.13 0.73 24.3 25.1 0.58 5.87 6.45 — 34,358 34,358 1.49 2.62 44.0 35,220 2027 8.78 13.9 35.0 104 0.13 0.58 24.3 24.9 0.55 5.87 6.42 — 33,743 33,743 0.90 2.52 40.3 34,557 2028 8.55 13.7 33.3 99.1 0.13 0.56 24.4 25.0 0.53 5.89 6.41 — 33,201 33,201 0.78 2.53 37.1 34,011 2029 7.59 13.3 31.2 93.3 0.13 0.53 24.3 24.9 0.50 5.87 6.37 — 32,464 32,464 0.77 2.51 33.8 33,265 2030 7.24 13.1 29.5 88.6 0.13 0.52 24.3 24.9 0.49 5.87 6.36 — 31,810 31,810 0.74 2.41 30.7 32,579 2031 7.03 12.2 28.4 83.7 0.13 0.51 24.3 24.9 0.47 5.87 6.35 — 31,150 31,150 0.73 2.41 28.0 31,915 2032 6.76 12.0 26.6 79.3 0.13 0.47 24.4 24.9 0.44 5.89 6.33 — 30,604 30,604 0.73 2.32 25.5 31,340 2033 6.53 11.8 25.6 75.4 0.13 0.44 24.3 24.8 0.41 5.87 6.29 — 29,911 29,911 0.69 1.74 23.2 30,469 2034 5.58 11.6 24.2 71.4 0.13 0.42 24.3 24.8 0.40 5.87 6.27 — 29,337 29,337 0.60 1.64 21.2 29,861 2035 5.47 11.5 23.3 68.6 0.13 0.39 24.3 24.7 0.37 5.87 6.24 — 28,803 28,803 0.59 1.64 14.0 29,320 2036 5.37 11.4 21.9 66.0 0.13 0.37 24.4 24.8 0.35 5.89 6.24 — 28,401 28,401 0.59 1.55 12.1 28,888 2037 5.22 11.3 21.5 63.5 0.13 0.36 24.3 24.7 0.34 5.87 6.22 — 27,885 27,885 0.56 1.54 10.2 28,368 2038 5.08 11.1 20.6 61.3 0.13 0.34 24.3 24.7 0.32 5.87 6.20 — 27,515 27,515 0.55 1.44 8.70 27,967 2039 4.94 11.0 20.3 59.5 0.13 0.33 24.3 24.7 0.31 5.87 6.19 — 27,165 27,165 0.55 1.44 7.34 27,616 2040 4.77 10.9 20.0 58.8 0.13 0.33 24.4 24.7 0.31 5.89 6.20 — 26,928 26,928 0.55 1.45 6.20 27,380 2041 4.51 10.1 18.7 56.8 0.13 0.31 24.3 24.7 0.29 5.87 6.16 — 26,580 26,580 0.54 1.44 5.21 27,029 2042 4.41 10.0 18.4 55.8 0.13 0.30 24.3 24.6 0.28 5.87 6.16 — 26,337 26,337 0.54 1.35 4.40 26,756 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 21 / 293
2043 4.41 10.0 18.3 55.0 0.13 0.29 24.3 24.6 0.28 5.87 6.15 — 26,123 26,123 0.51 1.35 3.72 26,541 2044 4.32 9.93 17.9 54.0 0.13 0.28 24.4 24.7 0.26 5.89 6.15 — 26,009 26,009 0.51 1.35 3.16 26,428 2045 4.22 9.82 17.6 53.8 0.13 0.27 24.3 24.6 0.26 5.87 6.13 — 25,777 25,777 0.40 1.35 2.67 26,191

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 545 1,466 437 3,957 8.16 23.0 728 751 23.1 185 208 15,947 1,180,83 2 1,196,77
9 1,680 37.2 442 1,250,29
7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 370 1,302 441 2,396 7.82 21.9 728 750 21.8 185 207 15,947 1,148,99 8 1,164,94
5 1,681 38.3 273 1,218,66
4 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 486 1,411 450 3,402 7.94 22.6 728 751 22.7 185 208 15,947 1,159,42 7 1,175,37
4 1,681 38.4 343 1,229,17
6 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 88.8 257 82.1 621 1.45 4.13 133 137 4.14 33.8 37.9 2,640 191,956 194,596 278 6.35 56.9 203,504

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 22 / 293
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Mobile 342 317 179 2,415 6.56 2.59 728 731 2.42 185 187 — 668,830 668,830 25.1 25.6 173 677,270 Area 175 1,135 12.4 1,395 0.07 1.02 — 1.02 1.35 — 1.35 0.00 4,510 4,510 0.19 0.04 — 4,526 Energy 28.0 14.0 245 147 1.53 19.3 — 19.3 19.3 — 19.3 — 488,085 488,085 50.2 3.40 — 490,354 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3,198 19,407 22,605 330 8.09 — 33,273 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12,749 0.00 12,749 1,274 0.00 — 44,605 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 269 269
Total 545 1,466 437 3,957 8.16 23.0 728 751 23.1 185 208 15,947 1,180,83 2 1,196,77
9 1,680 37.2 442 1,250,29
7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 342 317 196 2,249 6.29 2.59 728 731 2.42 185 187 — 641,506 641,506 26.1 26.8 4.49 650,164 Area 0.00 971 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 28.0 14.0 245 147 1.53 19.3 — 19.3 19.3 — 19.3 — 488,085 488,085 50.2 3.40 — 490,354 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3,198 19,407 22,605 330 8.09 — 33,273 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12,749 0.00 12,749 1,274 0.00 — 44,605 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 269 269
Total 370 1,302 441 2,396 7.82 21.9 728 750 21.8 185 207 15,947 1,148,99 8 1,164,94
5 1,681 38.3 273 1,218,66
4 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 339 314 196 2,300 6.37 2.59 728 731 2.42 185 187 — 648,845 648,845 25.9 26.9 74.8 657,575 Area 120 1,083 8.49 956 0.05 0.70 — 0.70 0.93 — 0.93 0.00 3,089 3,089 0.13 0.03 — 3,100 Energy 28.0 14.0 245 147 1.53 19.3 — 19.3 19.3 — 19.3 — 488,085 488,085 50.2 3.40 — 490,354 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3,198 19,407 22,605 330 8.09 — 33,273 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 12,749 0.00 12,749 1,274 0.00 — 44,605 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 269 269
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 23 / 293
Total 486 1,411 450 3,402 7.94 22.6 728 751 22.7 185 208 15,947 1,159,42 1,175,37 1,681 38.4 343 1,229,17 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 61.8 57.2 35.8 420 1.16 0.47 133 133 0.44 33.8 34.2 — 107,424 107,424 4.29 4.45 12.4 108,869 Area 21.9 198 1.55 174 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.17 — 0.17 0.00 511 511 0.02 < 0.005 — 513 Energy 5.11 2.55 44.8 26.8 0.28 3.53 — 3.53 3.53 — 3.53 — 80,808 80,808 8.31 0.56 — 81,184 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 529 3,213 3,742 54.7 1.34 — 5,509 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 2,111 0.00 2,111 211 0.00 — 7,385 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 44.5 44.5
Total 88.8 257 82.1 621 1.45 4.13 133 137 4.14 33.8 37.9 2,640 191,956 194,596 278 6.35 56.9 203,504

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.39 2.84 27.3 23.5 0.03 1.20 — 1.20 1.10 — 1.10 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.51 4.92 4.23 0.01 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 617 617 0.03 0.01 — 619 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 24 / 293
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.11 0.09 0.90 0.77 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 102 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 205 205 0.01 0.01 0.02 208 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 37.5 37.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 38.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.21 6.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.29 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 25 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.12 2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.12 2.62 24.9 21.7 0.03 1.06 — 1.06 0.98 — 0.98 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.23 1.87 17.8 15.6 0.02 0.76 — 0.76 0.70 — 0.70 — 2,453 2,453 0.10 0.02 — 2,462 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.41 0.34 3.25 2.84 < 0.005 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 406 406 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 212 212 0.01 0.01 0.84 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 26 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 0.01 0.01 0.02 203 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 146 146 0.01 0.01 0.26 148 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.2 24.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Demolition (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.86 2.40 22.2 19.9 0.03 0.92 — 0.92 0.84 — 0.84 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 27 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

2.86 2.40 22.2 19.9 0.03 0.92 — 0.92 0.84 — 0.84 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.04 1.71 15.9 14.2 0.02 0.66 — 0.66 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,446 2,446 0.10 0.02 — 2,455 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.37 0.31 2.89 2.60 < 0.005 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 0.01 0.01 0.76 210 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 197 197 0.01 0.01 0.02 199 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 143 143 0.01 0.01 0.23 144 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 28 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Demolition (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.72 2.29 20.7 19.0 0.03 0.84 — 0.84 0.78 — 0.78 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.72 2.29 20.7 19.0 0.03 0.84 — 0.84 0.78 — 0.78 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.95 1.63 14.8 13.6 0.02 0.60 — 0.60 0.55 — 0.55 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 29 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 0.30 2.69 2.48 < 0.005 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 0.01 0.01 0.69 206 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 193 193 0.01 0.01 0.02 195 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 140 140 0.01 0.01 0.21 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.1 23.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Demolition (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 30 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.64 2.21 19.9 18.6 0.03 0.80 — 0.80 0.73 — 0.73 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,439 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.64 2.21 19.9 18.6 0.03 0.80 — 0.80 0.73 — 0.73 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,439 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.89 1.58 14.2 13.3 0.02 0.57 — 0.57 0.52 — 0.52 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.29 2.59 2.43 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 199 199 0.01 0.01 0.62 202 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 31 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 189 189 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 191 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 137 137 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 139 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.7 22.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 23.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Demolition (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.61 2.19 19.6 18.7 0.03 0.78 — 0.78 0.71 — 0.71 — 3,429 3,429 0.14 0.03 — 3,440 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.87 1.57 14.0 13.4 0.02 0.56 — 0.56 0.51 — 0.51 — 2,456 2,456 0.10 0.02 — 2,464 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.29 2.56 2.44 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 407 407 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 < 0.005 0.01 0.56 198 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 188 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 135 135 < 0.005 0.01 0.17 137 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 33 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.3 22.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.13. Demolition (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.55 2.14 18.6 18.5 0.03 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,439 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.55 2.14 18.6 18.5 0.03 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,439 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.82 1.53 13.3 13.2 0.02 0.53 — 0.53 0.48 — 0.48 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 34 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.33 0.28 2.42 2.41 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 192 192 < 0.005 0.01 0.50 195 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 182 182 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 185 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 132 132 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 134 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.9 21.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 22.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Demolition (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 35 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.48 2.09 18.1 18.7 0.03 0.72 — 0.72 0.66 — 0.66 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.48 2.09 18.1 18.7 0.03 0.72 — 0.72 0.66 — 0.66 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.77 1.49 12.9 13.3 0.02 0.51 — 0.51 0.47 — 0.47 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 2.36 2.43 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 189 189 < 0.005 0.01 0.44 192 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 36 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 180 180 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 182 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 130 130 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 132 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.5 21.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.17. Demolition (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.43 2.04 17.5 18.3 0.03 0.70 — 0.70 0.64 — 0.64 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.73 1.46 12.5 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 2.29 2.39 < 0.005 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.39 187 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 177 177 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 179 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 128 128 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 130 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 38 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.2 21.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.19. Demolition (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 16.2 16.9 0.03 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 16.2 16.9 0.03 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.64 1.37 11.6 12.1 0.02 0.44 — 0.44 0.41 — 0.41 — 2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 — 2,463 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 39 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 2.12 2.20 < 0.005 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 406 406 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 184 184 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.35 185 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 174 174 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 175 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 127 127 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 128 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 21.0 21.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 21.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.21. Demolition (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 40 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.22 1.86 15.5 15.9 0.03 0.57 — 0.57 0.53 — 0.53 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.22 1.86 15.5 15.9 0.03 0.57 — 0.57 0.53 — 0.53 — 3,427 3,427 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.58 1.33 11.1 11.4 0.02 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 2,448 2,448 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.29 0.24 2.02 2.08 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 181 181 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 182 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 41 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 172 172 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 125 125 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 125 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 20.7 20.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 20.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.23. Demolition (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.17 1.82 15.1 15.7 0.03 0.54 — 0.54 0.50 — 0.50 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.55 1.30 10.8 11.2 0.02 0.39 — 0.39 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.24 1.97 2.05 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 179 179 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 180 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 170 170 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 170 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 123 123 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 124 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 43 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 20.4 20.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 20.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.25. Demolition (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.08 1.75 14.2 14.9 0.03 0.49 — 0.49 0.45 — 0.45 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.08 1.75 14.2 14.9 0.03 0.49 — 0.49 0.45 — 0.45 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.49 1.25 10.1 10.7 0.02 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 44 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.23 1.85 1.95 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 177 177 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 178 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 168 168 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 169 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 122 122 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 122 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 20.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.27. Demolition (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 45 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.99 1.67 13.4 14.1 0.03 0.44 — 0.44 0.41 — 0.41 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.99 1.67 13.4 14.1 0.03 0.44 — 0.44 0.41 — 0.41 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.43 1.20 9.59 10.1 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 — 2,462 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 1.75 1.85 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 406 406 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 176 176 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 176 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 46 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 167 167 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 167 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 121 121 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 122 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 20.1 20.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 20.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.29. Demolition (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.99 1.67 13.4 14.3 0.03 0.45 — 0.45 0.41 — 0.41 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.42 1.20 9.57 10.2 0.02 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 1.75 1.86 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 174 174 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 175 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 165 165 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 166 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 120 120 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 120 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 48 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.9 19.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 19.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.31. Demolition (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.90 1.60 12.4 13.2 0.03 0.40 — 0.40 0.37 — 0.37 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.90 1.60 12.4 13.2 0.03 0.40 — 0.40 0.37 — 0.37 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.36 1.14 8.83 9.43 0.02 0.29 — 0.29 0.26 — 0.26 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 49 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.25 0.21 1.61 1.72 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 173 173 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 174 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 164 164 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 165 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 119 119 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 119 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.7 19.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 19.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.33. Demolition (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 50 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.87 1.57 12.1 13.0 0.03 0.39 — 0.39 0.35 — 0.35 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.87 1.57 12.1 13.0 0.03 0.39 — 0.39 0.35 — 0.35 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.33 1.12 8.61 9.28 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.20 1.57 1.69 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 172 172 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 173 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 51 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 163 163 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 164 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 118 118 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 119 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 19.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.35. Demolition (2040) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.85 1.55 12.0 12.9 0.03 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.33 1.11 8.60 9.24 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 — 2,462 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.20 1.57 1.69 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 406 406 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 171 171 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 172 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 162 162 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 163 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 118 118 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 118 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 53 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.5 19.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 19.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.37. Demolition (2041) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.76 1.47 11.2 12.4 0.03 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.76 1.47 11.2 12.4 0.03 0.33 — 0.33 0.30 — 0.30 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.26 1.05 7.99 8.88 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 54 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.46 1.62 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 170 170 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 171 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 162 162 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 162 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 117 117 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 117 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.4 19.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.39. Demolition (2042) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 55 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.74 1.46 10.9 12.1 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.74 1.46 10.9 12.1 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.24 1.04 7.81 8.67 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,456 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.43 1.58 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 170 170 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 170 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 56 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 161 161 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 161 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 117 117 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 117 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.3 19.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.41. Demolition (2043) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.73 1.45 11.0 12.1 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.24 1.04 7.88 8.63 0.02 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,455 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.19 1.44 1.57 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 169 169 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 169 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 160 160 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 160 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 116 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 58 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.43. Demolition (2044) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.66 1.39 10.3 11.6 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.66 1.39 10.3 11.6 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.19 1.00 7.37 8.31 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,454 2,454 0.10 0.02 — 2,462 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 59 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.35 1.52 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 406 406 0.02 < 0.005 — 408 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 168 168 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 168 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 160 160 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 160 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 116 116 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 116 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.2 19.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.45. Demolition (2045) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 60 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.66 1.39 10.3 11.6 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.66 1.39 10.3 11.6 0.03 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 3,426 3,426 0.14 0.03 — 3,438 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 7.33 8.30 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,447 2,447 0.10 0.02 — 2,455 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.18 1.34 1.51 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 405 405 0.02 < 0.005 — 407 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 168 168 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 168 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 61 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 159 159 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 159 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 115 115 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 116 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 19.1 19.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.47. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.70 3.95 39.7 35.5 0.05 1.81 — 1.81 1.66 — 1.66 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 62 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.85 0.71 7.16 6.39 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.30 — 0.30 — 953 953 0.04 0.01 — 957 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.31 1.17 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 158 158 0.01 < 0.005 — 158 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.08 0.11 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 239 239 0.01 0.01 0.03 242 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 43.7 43.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 44.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.24 7.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.34 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 63 / 293

3.49. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.34 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.34 3.65 36.0 32.9 0.05 1.60 — 1.60 1.47 — 1.47 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.11 2.61 25.8 23.6 0.04 1.15 — 1.15 1.05 — 1.05 — 3,793 3,793 0.15 0.03 — 3,806 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 0.48 4.70 4.30 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 630 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 64 / 293
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.08 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 247 247 0.01 0.01 0.97 251 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 234 234 0.01 0.01 0.03 237 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 170 170 0.01 0.01 0.30 173 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.2 28.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 28.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.51. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 65 / 293
Off-Road 3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.94 3.31 31.6 30.2 0.05 1.37 — 1.37 1.26 — 1.26 — 5,295 5,295 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.81 2.36 22.6 21.6 0.03 0.98 — 0.98 0.90 — 0.90 — 3,782 3,782 0.15 0.03 — 3,795 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.51 0.43 4.12 3.93 0.01 0.18 — 0.18 0.16 — 0.16 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.08 0.08 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 242 242 0.01 0.01 0.89 246 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 229 229 0.01 0.01 0.02 232 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 66 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 166 166 0.01 0.01 0.27 168 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.5 27.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.53. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.74 3.14 29.2 28.8 0.05 1.24 — 1.24 1.14 — 1.14 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.74 3.14 29.2 28.8 0.05 1.24 — 1.24 1.14 — 1.14 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 67 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.67 2.25 20.8 20.6 0.03 0.89 — 0.89 0.82 — 0.82 — 3,784 3,784 0.15 0.03 — 3,797 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.41 3.80 3.76 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 627 627 0.03 0.01 — 629 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 237 237 0.01 0.01 0.80 241 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 225 225 0.01 0.01 0.02 228 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 163 163 0.01 0.01 0.25 165 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 27.3 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 68 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.55. Site Preparation (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.63 3.05 28.0 28.3 0.05 1.17 — 1.17 1.08 — 1.08 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.63 3.05 28.0 28.3 0.05 1.17 — 1.17 1.08 — 1.08 — 5,298 5,298 0.21 0.04 — 5,316 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.59 2.18 20.0 20.2 0.03 0.84 — 0.84 0.77 — 0.77 — 3,784 3,784 0.15 0.03 — 3,797 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.40 3.65 3.69 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 627 627 0.03 0.01 — 629 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 69 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 233 233 0.01 0.01 0.72 236 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 220 220 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 223 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 160 160 < 0.005 0.01 0.22 162 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.5 26.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 26.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.57. Site Preparation (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 70 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

3.61 3.04 27.5 28.4 0.05 1.14 — 1.14 1.05 — 1.05 — 5,300 5,300 0.21 0.04 — 5,318 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.61 3.04 27.5 28.4 0.05 1.14 — 1.14 1.05 — 1.05 — 5,300 5,300 0.21 0.04 — 5,318 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.59 2.17 19.7 20.3 0.04 0.82 — 0.82 0.75 — 0.75 — 3,796 3,796 0.15 0.03 — 3,809 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.40 3.59 3.71 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 631 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 228 228 < 0.005 0.01 0.65 232 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 217 217 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 219 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 71 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 157 157 < 0.005 0.01 0.20 159 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.1 26.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 26.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.59. Site Preparation (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.53 2.97 25.9 28.1 0.05 1.09 — 1.09 1.00 — 1.00 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.53 2.97 25.9 28.1 0.05 1.09 — 1.09 1.00 — 1.00 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 72 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.52 2.12 18.5 20.1 0.03 0.78 — 0.78 0.71 — 0.71 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.46 0.39 3.38 3.66 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 225 225 < 0.005 0.01 0.58 228 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 154 154 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 156 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.5 25.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 25.9 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 73 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.61. Site Preparation (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.47 2.92 25.2 28.4 0.05 1.07 — 1.07 0.98 — 0.98 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.47 2.92 25.2 28.4 0.05 1.07 — 1.07 0.98 — 0.98 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.48 2.08 18.0 20.3 0.03 0.76 — 0.76 0.70 — 0.70 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.45 0.38 3.29 3.71 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 74 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 221 221 < 0.005 0.01 0.52 224 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 209 209 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 212 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 152 152 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 154 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.1 25.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 25.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.63. Site Preparation (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 75 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

3.41 2.87 24.3 27.9 0.05 1.04 — 1.04 0.96 — 0.96 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.41 2.87 24.3 27.9 0.05 1.04 — 1.04 0.96 — 0.96 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.44 2.05 17.4 19.9 0.03 0.75 — 0.75 0.69 — 0.69 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.44 0.37 3.17 3.64 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 218 218 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.46 218 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 206 206 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 209 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 76 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 150 150 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 151 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.8 24.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 25.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.65. Site Preparation (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.22 2.70 22.3 25.7 0.05 0.93 — 0.93 0.85 — 0.85 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.22 2.70 22.3 25.7 0.05 0.93 — 0.93 0.85 — 0.85 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 77 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.30 1.94 16.0 18.4 0.04 0.66 — 0.66 0.61 — 0.61 — 3,793 3,793 0.15 0.03 — 3,806 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.42 0.35 2.91 3.37 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 630 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 215 215 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.41 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 204 204 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 204 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 148 148 < 0.005 0.01 0.13 150 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.5 24.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 24.8 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 78 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.67. Site Preparation (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.13 2.63 21.2 24.4 0.05 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.13 2.63 21.2 24.4 0.05 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.23 1.88 15.1 17.4 0.03 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.41 0.34 2.76 3.18 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 79 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 212 212 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.36 212 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 201 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 146 146 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 146 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 24.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.69. Site Preparation (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 80 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

3.06 2.57 20.6 24.1 0.05 0.82 — 0.82 0.75 — 0.75 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.06 2.57 20.6 24.1 0.05 0.82 — 0.82 0.75 — 0.75 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.18 1.84 14.7 17.2 0.03 0.58 — 0.58 0.54 — 0.54 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.34 2.68 3.14 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 209 209 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 210 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 198 198 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 199 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 81 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 144 144 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 144 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.8 23.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 23.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.71. Site Preparation (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.93 2.46 19.2 22.9 0.05 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.93 2.46 19.2 22.9 0.05 0.74 — 0.74 0.68 — 0.68 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 82 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.09 1.76 13.7 16.3 0.03 0.53 — 0.53 0.48 — 0.48 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.50 2.98 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 208 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 142 142 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 143 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 23.6 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 83 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.73. Site Preparation (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.79 2.35 18.0 21.7 0.05 0.67 — 0.67 0.62 — 0.62 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.79 2.35 18.0 21.7 0.05 0.67 — 0.67 0.62 — 0.62 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.00 1.68 12.9 15.6 0.04 0.48 — 0.48 0.44 — 0.44 — 3,793 3,793 0.15 0.03 — 3,806 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.37 0.31 2.35 2.84 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 630 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 84 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 205 205 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 206 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 195 195 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 195 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 141 141 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.4 23.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 23.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.75. Site Preparation (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 85 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

2.79 2.35 18.1 21.9 0.05 0.68 — 0.68 0.63 — 0.63 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.79 2.35 18.1 21.9 0.05 0.68 — 0.68 0.63 — 0.63 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.00 1.68 12.9 15.7 0.03 0.49 — 0.49 0.45 — 0.45 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.36 0.31 2.35 2.86 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 204 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 193 193 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 193 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 86 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 140 140 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 140 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.2 23.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 23.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.77. Site Preparation (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.65 2.23 16.5 20.3 0.05 0.61 — 0.61 0.56 — 0.56 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.65 2.23 16.5 20.3 0.05 0.61 — 0.61 0.56 — 0.56 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 87 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.89 1.59 11.8 14.5 0.03 0.44 — 0.44 0.40 — 0.40 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.35 0.29 2.15 2.65 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 202 202 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 203 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 192 192 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 192 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 139 139 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 139 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.0 23.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 23.1 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 88 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.79. Site Preparation (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.60 2.19 16.0 20.0 0.05 0.59 — 0.59 0.54 — 0.54 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.60 2.19 16.0 20.0 0.05 0.59 — 0.59 0.54 — 0.54 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.86 1.56 11.5 14.3 0.03 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.28 2.09 2.61 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 89 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 201 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 191 191 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 191 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 138 138 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 138 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.9 22.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 22.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.81. Site Preparation (2040) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 90 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

2.58 2.17 15.9 19.8 0.05 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.58 2.17 15.9 19.8 0.05 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.85 1.55 11.4 14.2 0.04 0.42 — 0.42 0.38 — 0.38 — 3,793 3,793 0.15 0.03 — 3,806 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.28 2.08 2.59 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 630 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 200 200 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 200 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 189 189 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 190 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 91 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 138 138 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 138 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.8 22.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 22.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.83. Site Preparation (2041) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.43 2.05 14.7 19.1 0.05 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.43 2.05 14.7 19.1 0.05 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 92 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.74 1.46 10.5 13.7 0.03 0.36 — 0.36 0.33 — 0.33 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 1.92 2.49 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 199 199 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 199 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 188 188 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 189 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 137 137 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 137 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.6 22.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 22.7 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 93 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.85. Site Preparation (2042) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.40 2.02 14.3 18.7 0.05 0.49 — 0.49 0.45 — 0.45 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.40 2.02 14.3 18.7 0.05 0.49 — 0.49 0.45 — 0.45 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.72 1.44 10.2 13.4 0.03 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 1.87 2.44 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 94 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 198 198 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 198 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 188 188 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 188 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 136 136 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 136 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.5 22.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.87. Site Preparation (2043) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 95 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

2.39 2.01 14.5 18.6 0.05 0.48 — 0.48 0.44 — 0.44 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.39 2.01 14.5 18.6 0.05 0.48 — 0.48 0.44 — 0.44 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.71 1.44 10.3 13.3 0.03 0.34 — 0.34 0.32 — 0.32 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 1.89 2.43 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 197 197 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 187 187 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 187 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 96 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 135 135 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 136 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.89. Site Preparation (2044) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 13.4 17.9 0.05 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 13.4 17.9 0.05 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 97 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.63 1.37 9.57 12.8 0.04 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 3,793 3,793 0.15 0.03 — 3,806 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 1.75 2.34 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 628 628 0.03 0.01 — 630 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 187 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 135 135 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 136 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.4 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 98 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.91. Site Preparation (2045) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 13.3 17.9 0.05 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.28 1.92 13.3 17.9 0.05 0.42 — 0.42 0.39 — 0.39 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.63 1.37 9.51 12.8 0.03 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 3,783 3,783 0.15 0.03 — 3,796 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 1.74 2.34 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 626 626 0.03 0.01 — 628 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 99 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 196 196 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 196 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 186 186 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 186 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 135 135 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 135 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 22.3 22.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.93. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 100 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.43 3.72 37.3 31.4 0.06 1.59 — 1.59 1.47 — 1.47 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 0.67 6.72 5.65 0.01 0.29 — 0.29 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,188 1,188 0.05 0.01 — 1,192 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 1.23 1.03 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 197 197 0.01 < 0.005 — 197 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.09 0.12 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 274 274 0.01 0.01 0.03 277 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 50.0 50.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 50.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 101 / 293
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.28 8.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 8.39 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.95. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

4.19 3.52 34.3 30.2 0.06 1.45 — 1.45 1.33 — 1.33 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.00 2.52 24.6 21.6 0.04 1.04 — 1.04 0.95 — 0.95 — 4,726 4,726 0.19 0.04 — 4,742 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.55 0.46 4.48 3.94 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 102 / 293
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.10 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 282 282 0.01 0.01 1.11 287 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.11 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 268 268 0.01 0.01 0.03 271 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 195 195 0.01 0.01 0.34 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 32.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.97. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 103 / 293
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.80 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 1.23 — 1.23 1.14 — 1.14 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,622 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.80 3.20 29.7 28.3 0.06 1.23 — 1.23 1.14 — 1.14 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,622 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.72 2.28 21.2 20.2 0.04 0.88 — 0.88 0.81 — 0.81 — 4,713 4,713 0.19 0.04 — 4,730 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.50 0.42 3.87 3.69 0.01 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.09 1.39 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 277 277 0.01 0.01 1.01 281 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 104 / 293
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 262 262 0.01 0.01 0.03 265 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 190 190 0.01 0.01 0.31 193 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 31.5 31.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 31.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.99. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.62 3.04 27.2 27.6 0.06 1.12 — 1.12 1.03 — 1.03 — 6,599 6,599 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.59 2.17 19.4 19.7 0.04 0.80 — 0.80 0.74 — 0.74 — 4,713 4,713 0.19 0.04 — 4,729 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.40 3.55 3.59 0.01 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 271 271 0.01 0.01 0.92 275 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 257 257 0.01 0.01 0.02 260 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 186 186 0.01 0.01 0.28 189 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 106 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 30.8 30.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 31.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.101. Grading (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.51 2.95 25.6 27.3 0.06 1.04 — 1.04 0.96 — 0.96 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.51 2.95 25.6 27.3 0.06 1.04 — 1.04 0.96 — 0.96 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.50 2.10 18.3 19.5 0.04 0.75 — 0.75 0.69 — 0.69 — 4,713 4,713 0.19 0.04 — 4,729 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 107 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.46 0.38 3.33 3.56 0.01 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.20 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 266 266 0.01 0.01 0.83 270 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 252 252 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 255 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 183 183 < 0.005 0.01 0.25 185 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 30.2 30.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 30.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.103. Grading (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 108 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.43 2.88 24.3 27.2 0.06 0.99 — 0.99 0.91 — 0.91 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.43 2.88 24.3 27.2 0.06 0.99 — 0.99 0.91 — 0.91 — 6,598 6,598 0.27 0.05 — 6,621 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.45 2.06 17.4 19.5 0.04 0.71 — 0.71 0.65 — 0.65 — 4,726 4,726 0.19 0.04 — 4,742 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.45 0.38 3.18 3.55 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 261 261 < 0.005 0.01 0.74 265 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 109 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 247 247 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 250 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 180 180 < 0.005 0.01 0.23 182 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 29.8 29.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 30.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.105. Grading (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.32 2.79 22.7 26.9 0.06 0.92 — 0.92 0.84 — 0.84 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.37 1.99 16.2 19.2 0.04 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.36 2.96 3.50 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.06 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 257 257 < 0.005 0.01 0.67 260 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 243 243 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 246 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 176 176 < 0.005 0.01 0.21 179 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 111 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 29.2 29.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.107. Grading (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.23 2.72 21.7 26.9 0.06 0.88 — 0.88 0.81 — 0.81 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.23 2.72 21.7 26.9 0.06 0.88 — 0.88 0.81 — 0.81 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.31 1.94 15.5 19.2 0.04 0.63 — 0.63 0.58 — 0.58 — 4,711 4,711 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 112 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.42 0.35 2.82 3.50 0.01 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 252 252 < 0.005 0.01 0.59 256 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 239 239 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 242 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 173 173 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 176 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.7 28.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.109. Grading (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 113 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.17 2.66 20.6 26.6 0.06 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.17 2.66 20.6 26.6 0.06 0.86 — 0.86 0.79 — 0.79 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.26 1.90 14.7 19.0 0.04 0.61 — 0.61 0.56 — 0.56 — 4,711 4,711 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.41 0.35 2.69 3.47 0.01 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 249 249 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.53 250 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 114 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 236 236 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 239 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 171 171 < 0.005 0.01 0.16 173 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.3 28.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.111. Grading (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.05 2.56 19.4 25.8 0.06 0.79 — 0.79 0.73 — 0.73 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.18 1.84 13.9 18.5 0.04 0.57 — 0.57 0.52 — 0.52 — 4,724 4,724 0.19 0.04 — 4,741 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 0.33 2.54 3.37 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 245 245 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.46 246 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 233 233 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 233 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 169 169 < 0.005 0.01 0.14 171 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 116 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.0 28.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 28.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.113. Grading (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.97 2.50 18.5 25.2 0.06 0.73 — 0.73 0.68 — 0.68 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.97 2.50 18.5 25.2 0.06 0.73 — 0.73 0.68 — 0.68 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.12 1.79 13.2 18.0 0.04 0.52 — 0.52 0.48 — 0.48 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 117 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.39 0.33 2.42 3.29 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 242 242 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.41 243 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 230 230 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 230 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 166 166 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 167 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.5 27.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.115. Grading (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 118 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.90 2.44 17.8 25.1 0.06 0.68 — 0.68 0.62 — 0.62 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.90 2.44 17.8 25.1 0.06 0.68 — 0.68 0.62 — 0.62 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.07 1.74 12.7 17.9 0.04 0.48 — 0.48 0.45 — 0.45 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.38 0.32 2.31 3.27 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 239 239 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.36 240 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 119 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 227 227 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 227 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 164 164 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 165 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.117. Grading (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.81 2.36 16.8 24.6 0.06 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.01 1.69 12.0 17.6 0.04 0.45 — 0.45 0.41 — 0.41 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.37 0.31 2.19 3.21 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 237 237 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 237 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 224 224 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 225 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 163 163 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 163 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 121 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.9 26.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 27.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.119. Grading (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.71 2.28 15.9 24.1 0.06 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.71 2.28 15.9 24.1 0.06 0.58 — 0.58 0.53 — 0.53 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.94 1.63 11.4 17.3 0.04 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 4,724 4,724 0.19 0.04 — 4,741 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 122 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.35 0.30 2.07 3.15 0.01 0.08 — 0.08 0.07 — 0.07 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 235 235 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.27 235 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 223 223 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 223 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 162 162 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 162 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.8 26.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 26.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.121. Grading (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 123 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.66 2.23 15.3 23.9 0.06 0.56 — 0.56 0.51 — 0.51 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.66 2.23 15.3 23.9 0.06 0.56 — 0.56 0.51 — 0.51 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.90 1.59 10.9 17.1 0.04 0.40 — 0.40 0.37 — 0.37 — 4,711 4,711 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.35 0.29 1.99 3.12 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 233 233 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 233 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 124 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 221 221 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 221 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 160 160 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 160 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.5 26.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 26.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.123. Grading (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.57 2.16 14.3 23.2 0.06 0.52 — 0.52 0.48 — 0.48 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.84 1.54 10.2 16.5 0.04 0.37 — 0.37 0.34 — 0.34 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.34 0.28 1.87 3.02 0.01 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 231 231 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 232 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 219 219 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 220 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 159 159 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 159 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 126 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.3 26.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 26.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.125. Grading (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.52 2.12 13.8 22.7 0.06 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.52 2.12 13.8 22.7 0.06 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.80 1.51 9.86 16.2 0.04 0.35 — 0.35 0.33 — 0.33 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 127 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.33 0.28 1.80 2.96 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 230 230 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 230 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 218 218 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 218 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 158 158 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 158 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.1 26.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 26.2 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.127. Grading (2040) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 128 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.49 2.10 13.5 22.5 0.06 0.48 — 0.48 0.44 — 0.44 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.49 2.10 13.5 22.5 0.06 0.48 — 0.48 0.44 — 0.44 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.79 1.50 9.66 16.1 0.04 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 4,724 4,724 0.19 0.04 — 4,741 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.33 0.27 1.76 2.94 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 228 228 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 229 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 129 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 217 217 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 217 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 157 157 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 158 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 26.0 26.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 26.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.129. Grading (2041) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.43 2.04 12.9 22.1 0.06 0.45 — 0.45 0.41 — 0.41 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.73 1.46 9.20 15.8 0.04 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.32 0.27 1.68 2.88 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 227 227 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 227 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 215 215 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 216 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 156 156 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 156 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 131 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 25.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.131. Grading (2042) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.40 2.02 12.5 21.7 0.06 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.40 2.02 12.5 21.7 0.06 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.71 1.44 8.96 15.5 0.04 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 4,712 4,712 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 132 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 1.63 2.83 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 226 226 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 226 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 214 214 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 155 155 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 156 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.7 25.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 25.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.133. Grading (2043) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 133 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.38 2.00 12.4 21.6 0.06 0.42 — 0.42 0.38 — 0.38 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.38 2.00 12.4 21.6 0.06 0.42 — 0.42 0.38 — 0.38 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.70 1.43 8.87 15.4 0.04 0.30 — 0.30 0.27 — 0.27 — 4,711 4,711 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.26 1.62 2.81 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 225 225 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 225 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 134 / 293
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 214 214 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 214 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 155 155 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 155 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.6 25.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.135. Grading (2044) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.33 1.96 11.8 21.1 0.06 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.67 1.40 8.49 15.1 0.04 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 4,724 4,724 0.19 0.04 — 4,741 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.26 1.55 2.76 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 782 782 0.03 0.01 — 785 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 224 224 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 225 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 213 213 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 213 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 155 155 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 155 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 136 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.6 25.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.137. Grading (2045) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.31 1.94 11.6 21.0 0.06 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

2.31 1.94 11.6 21.0 0.06 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 6,596 6,596 0.27 0.05 — 6,619 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.65 1.38 8.32 15.0 0.04 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 4,711 4,711 0.19 0.04 — 4,728 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 137 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.25 1.52 2.73 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 780 780 0.03 0.01 — 783 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 224 224 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 224 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 212 212 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 213 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 154 154 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 154 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 25.5 25.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.139. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 138 / 293
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.50 1.26 11.8 13.2 0.02 0.55 — 0.55 0.51 — 0.51 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.23 2.13 2.37 < 0.005 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 432 432 0.02 < 0.005 — 433 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.39 0.43 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 71.5 71.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 71.7 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 55.6 46.4 61.1 693 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 136,666 136,666 6.28 4.96 15.8 138,316 Vendor 9.22 4.40 152 74.3 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 1.64 8.64 10.3 — 119,723 119,723 4.82 16.3 8.31 124,701 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 139 / 293
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker 9.97 8.31 11.0 131 0.00 0.00 23.2 23.2 0.00 5.44 5.44 — 24,972 24,972 1.13 0.89 47.5 25,314 Vendor 1.68 0.79 27.5 13.2 0.15 0.30 5.58 5.88 0.30 1.54 1.84 — 21,550 21,550 0.87 2.93 25.0 22,470 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.82 1.52 2.00 23.9 0.00 0.00 4.24 4.24 0.00 0.99 0.99 — 4,134 4,134 0.19 0.15 7.87 4,191 Vendor 0.31 0.14 5.03 2.42 0.03 0.05 1.02 1.07 0.05 0.28 0.34 — 3,568 3,568 0.14 0.48 4.14 3,720 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.141. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.44 1.20 11.2 13.1 0.02 0.50 — 0.50 0.46 — 0.46 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 140 / 293
Off-Road 1.03 0.86 8.04 9.39 0.02 0.36 — 0.36 0.33 — 0.33 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.47 1.71 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 49.8 44.8 47.8 754 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 141,055 141,055 5.84 4.74 556 143,168 Vendor 9.30 3.58 139 68.2 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 1.64 8.64 10.3 — 117,981 117,981 4.82 16.3 320 123,270 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 49.3 44.2 56.6 637 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 133,684 133,684 6.06 4.96 14.4 135,327 Vendor 9.22 3.50 144 69.7 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 1.64 8.64 10.3 — 118,030 118,030 4.82 16.3 8.29 123,008 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 35.2 31.5 40.4 480 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 97,173 97,173 4.34 3.55 172 98,511 Vendor 6.66 2.56 105 49.4 0.59 1.18 22.2 23.4 1.18 6.14 7.32 — 84,518 84,518 3.45 11.7 98.5 88,176 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 6.42 5.74 7.37 87.6 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 16,088 16,088 0.72 0.59 28.5 16,310 Vendor 1.22 0.47 19.1 9.01 0.11 0.21 4.05 4.27 0.21 1.12 1.34 — 13,993 13,993 0.57 1.93 16.3 14,598 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 141 / 293

3.143. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.35 1.13 10.4 13.0 0.02 0.43 — 0.43 0.40 — 0.40 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 7.46 9.31 0.02 0.31 — 0.31 0.28 — 0.28 — 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01 — 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.18 0.15 1.36 1.70 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 142 / 293
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker 47.8 42.8 43.3 695 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 138,129 138,129 5.84 4.74 506 140,192 Vendor 8.32 3.42 132 64.5 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 116,023 116,023 4.82 16.3 318 121,310 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 47.4 42.4 48.0 589 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 130,928 130,928 6.06 4.96 13.1 132,569 Vendor 8.24 3.34 138 65.2 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 116,077 116,077 4.82 16.3 8.24 121,054 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 33.7 30.1 37.0 442 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 94,907 94,907 4.33 3.38 156 96,179 Vendor 5.89 2.38 98.8 46.1 0.59 1.17 22.1 23.3 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 82,890 82,890 3.44 11.6 98.3 86,537 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 6.14 5.50 6.76 80.7 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 15,713 15,713 0.72 0.56 25.8 15,924 Vendor 1.07 0.44 18.0 8.41 0.11 0.21 4.04 4.25 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 13,723 13,723 0.57 1.92 16.3 14,327 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.145. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 143 / 293
Off-Road 1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.28 1.07 9.85 13.0 0.02 0.38 — 0.38 0.35 — 0.35 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.77 7.04 9.26 0.02 0.27 — 0.27 0.25 — 0.25 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 1.28 1.69 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 41.5 36.8 38.8 645 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 135,352 135,352 5.62 4.74 458 137,362 Vendor 8.24 3.42 126 60.8 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 114,016 114,016 4.74 16.3 308 119,291 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 41.5 36.6 43.5 551 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 128,315 128,315 5.84 4.74 11.9 129,884 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 144 / 293
Vendor 8.08 3.26 131 62.3 0.82 1.64 31.3 32.9 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 114,074 114,074 4.74 16.3 8.00 119,049 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 29.5 26.0 33.8 412 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 93,006 93,006 4.17 3.38 142 94,260 Vendor 5.83 2.38 94.4 44.0 0.59 1.17 22.1 23.3 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 81,457 81,457 3.39 11.6 94.9 85,100 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 5.38 4.74 6.17 75.1 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 15,398 15,398 0.69 0.56 23.4 15,606 Vendor 1.06 0.44 17.2 8.03 0.11 0.21 4.04 4.25 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 13,486 13,486 0.56 1.92 15.7 14,089 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.147. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.23 1.03 9.39 12.9 0.02 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 145 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.88 0.74 6.71 9.24 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.13 1.22 1.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 40.2 35.5 34.5 600 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 132,761 132,761 5.62 4.74 414 134,727 Vendor 7.34 3.42 120 57.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 111,810 111,810 4.74 15.4 292 116,823 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 39.8 34.8 43.1 508 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 125,865 125,865 1.76 4.74 10.7 127,331 Vendor 7.18 3.26 125 58.6 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 111,871 111,871 4.74 15.4 7.57 116,601 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 28.4 24.9 30.8 382 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 91,230 91,230 1.26 3.38 127 92,397 Vendor 5.24 2.38 90.0 41.4 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 79,882 79,882 3.39 11.0 89.9 83,345 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 5.18 4.54 5.61 69.7 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 15,104 15,104 0.21 0.56 21.1 15,297 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 146 / 293
Vendor 0.96 0.44 16.4 7.56 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 13,225 13,225 0.56 1.83 14.9 13,799 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.149. Building Construction (2028) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.18 0.99 8.92 12.9 0.02 0.30 — 0.30 0.28 — 0.28 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.85 0.71 6.39 9.26 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.20 — 0.20 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.17 1.69 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 147 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 38.9 34.1 34.0 563 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 130,385 130,385 1.32 4.74 372 132,201 Vendor 7.34 2.60 115 55.4 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 109,201 109,201 3.92 15.4 276 114,155 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 38.7 33.9 38.8 479 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 123,621 123,621 1.54 4.74 9.61 125,081 Vendor 7.18 2.43 120 55.9 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 109,266 109,266 3.92 15.4 7.16 113,975 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 27.5 24.1 27.6 359 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 89,850 89,850 1.10 3.39 115 91,003 Vendor 5.20 1.80 86.3 39.5 0.59 0.59 22.2 22.8 0.59 6.14 6.73 — 78,234 78,234 2.81 11.1 85.1 81,687 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 5.02 4.40 5.04 65.5 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 14,876 14,876 0.18 0.56 19.1 15,067 Vendor 0.95 0.33 15.7 7.22 0.11 0.11 4.05 4.16 0.11 1.12 1.23 — 12,953 12,953 0.46 1.83 14.1 13,524 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.151. Building Construction (2029) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 148 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

1.15 0.97 8.58 12.9 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.15 0.97 8.58 12.9 0.02 0.28 — 0.28 0.25 — 0.25 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.82 0.69 6.13 9.22 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.18 — 0.18 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 1.12 1.68 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.03 — 0.03 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 37.6 32.8 29.7 527 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 128,165 128,165 1.32 4.74 333 129,942 Vendor 7.34 2.52 109 52.7 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 106,312 106,312 3.84 15.4 260 111,247 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 33.0 32.4 34.2 446 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 121,530 121,530 1.54 4.74 8.62 122,989 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 149 / 293
Vendor 7.09 2.35 114 53.9 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 106,380 106,380 3.84 15.4 6.75 111,086 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.4 23.0 24.5 334 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 88,085 88,085 1.10 3.38 103 89,223 Vendor 5.13 1.74 82.1 38.0 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 75,958 75,958 2.74 11.0 80.2 79,377 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.28 4.19 4.46 61.0 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 14,583 14,583 0.18 0.56 17.0 14,772 Vendor 0.94 0.32 15.0 6.94 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 12,576 12,576 0.45 1.82 13.3 13,142 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.153. Building Construction (2030) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.12 0.94 8.39 12.9 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.12 0.94 8.39 12.9 0.02 0.26 — 0.26 0.24 — 0.24 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 150 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.80 0.67 5.99 9.20 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.17 — 0.17 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 1.09 1.68 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 32.2 31.5 25.4 495 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 126,086 126,086 1.32 4.74 296 127,826 Vendor 6.35 2.43 105 50.8 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 103,193 103,193 3.84 14.5 246 107,869 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 31.7 31.1 30.0 417 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 119,568 119,568 1.32 4.74 7.69 121,019 Vendor 6.27 2.27 110 52.0 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 103,263 103,263 3.84 14.5 6.36 107,700 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.5 22.0 21.4 314 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 86,660 86,660 0.94 3.38 91.1 87,783 Vendor 4.54 1.68 78.2 36.7 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 73,730 73,730 2.74 10.4 75.7 76,971 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 4.11 4.02 3.90 57.3 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 14,348 14,348 0.16 0.56 15.1 14,533 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 151 / 293
Vendor 0.83 0.31 14.3 6.69 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 12,207 12,207 0.45 1.72 12.5 12,743 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.155. Building Construction (2031) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.10 0.92 8.12 12.8 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.10 0.92 8.12 12.8 0.02 0.24 — 0.24 0.22 — 0.22 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.78 0.66 5.80 9.18 0.02 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 1.06 1.67 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 152 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 30.6 25.9 25.2 463 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 124,175 124,175 1.10 0.66 263 124,662 Vendor 6.35 2.43 99.9 49.0 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 99,811 99,811 3.76 14.5 232 104,471 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 30.2 25.7 29.7 393 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 117,770 117,770 1.32 4.74 6.82 119,221 Vendor 6.11 2.27 105 49.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 99,883 99,883 3.76 14.5 6.00 104,317 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 21.7 18.3 21.1 293 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 85,356 85,356 0.94 3.38 81.2 86,468 Vendor 4.48 1.68 74.9 35.4 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 71,315 71,315 2.68 10.4 71.3 74,550 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.96 3.34 3.85 53.5 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 14,132 14,132 0.16 0.56 13.4 14,316 Vendor 0.82 0.31 13.7 6.46 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 11,807 11,807 0.44 1.72 11.8 12,343 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.157. Building Construction (2032) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 153 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 0.90 7.87 12.8 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.21 — 0.21 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.07 0.90 7.87 12.8 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.21 — 0.21 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.77 0.64 5.64 9.16 0.02 0.16 — 0.16 0.15 — 0.15 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.12 1.03 1.67 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 29.3 24.8 20.9 436 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 122,495 122,495 1.10 0.66 232 122,952 Vendor 6.27 2.43 96.2 47.1 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 96,434 96,434 3.76 13.7 219 100,836 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 29.1 24.6 25.4 368 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 116,182 116,182 1.32 0.66 6.00 116,418 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 154 / 293
Vendor 6.11 2.27 100 48.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 96,507 96,507 3.76 13.7 5.67 100,696 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.8 17.4 18.1 277 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 84,432 84,432 0.95 3.39 71.8 85,538 Vendor 4.43 1.69 71.8 34.2 0.59 0.59 22.2 22.8 0.59 6.14 6.73 — 69,092 69,092 2.69 9.83 67.6 72,156 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.80 3.18 3.30 50.6 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 13,979 13,979 0.16 0.56 11.9 14,162 Vendor 0.81 0.31 13.1 6.24 0.11 0.11 4.05 4.16 0.11 1.12 1.23 — 11,439 11,439 0.45 1.63 11.2 11,946 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.159. Building Construction (2033) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.05 0.88 7.67 12.8 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.05 0.88 7.67 12.8 0.02 0.20 — 0.20 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 155 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.75 0.63 5.48 9.13 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 0.11 1.00 1.67 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 28.4 23.9 20.7 413 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 120,871 120,871 1.10 0.66 204 121,299 Vendor 6.27 2.43 92.4 45.4 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 93,160 93,160 3.76 13.7 208 97,551 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 28.0 23.5 21.1 349 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 114,650 114,650 1.10 0.66 5.28 114,880 Vendor 6.11 2.27 96.6 46.5 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 93,236 93,236 3.76 13.7 5.40 97,424 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.0 16.8 18.0 262 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 83,090 83,090 0.79 0.47 62.8 83,313 Vendor 4.42 1.68 68.9 32.8 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 66,566 66,566 2.68 9.80 64.1 69,618 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 3.65 3.06 3.29 47.9 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,756 13,756 0.13 0.08 10.4 13,793 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 156 / 293
Vendor 0.81 0.31 12.6 5.98 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 11,021 11,021 0.44 1.62 10.6 11,526 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.161. Building Construction (2034) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 0.86 7.52 12.8 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.03 0.86 7.52 12.8 0.02 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.74 0.62 5.37 9.12 0.02 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.98 1.66 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 157 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.2 22.8 16.4 390 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 119,451 119,451 1.10 0.66 178 119,854 Vendor 5.45 2.43 88.7 43.6 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 89,953 89,953 2.93 12.9 199 94,069 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 23.0 22.6 20.9 329 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 113,307 113,307 1.10 0.66 4.61 113,536 Vendor 5.29 2.27 92.9 44.7 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 90,030 90,030 2.93 12.9 5.17 93,952 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.3 16.0 14.9 246 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 82,116 82,116 0.79 0.47 54.9 82,331 Vendor 3.84 1.68 66.2 31.5 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 64,275 64,275 2.10 9.21 61.5 67,135 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.97 2.91 2.73 44.8 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,595 13,595 0.13 0.08 9.10 13,631 Vendor 0.70 0.31 12.1 5.75 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 10,641 10,641 0.35 1.53 10.2 11,115 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.163. Building Construction (2035) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 158 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

1.01 0.85 7.34 12.7 0.02 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.01 0.85 7.34 12.7 0.02 0.18 — 0.18 0.17 — 0.17 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.72 0.61 5.24 9.06 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.96 1.65 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.6 22.1 16.4 371 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 118,193 118,193 0.88 0.66 154 118,567 Vendor 5.45 2.43 85.8 42.6 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 86,892 86,892 2.85 12.9 88.6 90,896 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.4 21.9 20.9 314 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 112,118 112,118 1.10 0.66 4.00 112,346 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 159 / 293
Vendor 5.21 2.27 90.0 43.6 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 86,970 86,970 2.85 12.9 2.29 90,888 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.0 15.7 14.8 235 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 81,255 81,255 0.79 0.47 47.4 81,463 Vendor 3.84 1.68 64.1 30.8 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 62,089 62,089 2.04 9.21 27.3 64,913 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.91 2.86 2.70 42.9 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,453 13,453 0.13 0.08 7.86 13,487 Vendor 0.70 0.31 11.7 5.62 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 10,280 10,280 0.34 1.53 4.52 10,747 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.165. Building Construction (2036) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 0.83 7.12 12.6 0.02 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.99 0.83 7.12 12.6 0.02 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 160 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.71 0.60 5.10 9.03 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.93 1.65 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.1 21.7 16.2 353 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 117,161 117,161 0.88 0.66 134 117,514 Vendor 5.37 2.43 83.0 41.7 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 84,030 84,030 2.85 12.1 74.1 87,775 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 22.1 21.7 16.6 300 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 111,146 111,146 1.10 0.66 3.47 111,374 Vendor 5.21 2.27 87.2 42.7 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 84,110 84,110 2.85 12.1 1.92 87,782 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.7 15.4 11.9 225 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 80,767 80,767 0.79 0.47 41.4 80,969 Vendor 3.85 1.69 62.3 30.3 0.59 0.59 22.2 22.8 0.59 6.14 6.73 — 60,210 60,210 2.04 8.65 22.9 62,862 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.86 2.81 2.17 41.1 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 13,372 13,372 0.13 0.08 6.85 13,405 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 161 / 293
Vendor 0.70 0.31 11.4 5.52 0.11 0.11 4.05 4.16 0.11 1.12 1.23 — 9,968 9,968 0.34 1.43 3.79 10,407 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.167. Building Construction (2037) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.98 0.82 6.99 12.5 0.02 0.16 — 0.16 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.98 0.82 6.99 12.5 0.02 0.16 — 0.16 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.70 0.58 4.99 8.93 0.02 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.91 1.63 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 162 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 21.3 20.8 16.2 339 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 116,168 116,168 0.88 0.66 115 116,502 Vendor 5.37 2.35 81.0 40.8 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 81,477 81,477 2.85 12.1 61.4 85,209 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 21.3 21.0 16.4 286 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 110,205 110,205 0.88 0.66 2.99 110,426 Vendor 5.21 2.27 85.2 41.8 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 81,557 81,557 2.85 12.1 1.59 85,229 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 15.2 14.9 11.7 215 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 79,865 79,865 0.63 0.47 35.6 80,057 Vendor 3.78 1.62 60.7 29.5 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 58,222 58,222 2.04 8.63 18.9 60,862 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.77 2.71 2.14 39.1 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,223 13,223 0.10 0.08 5.90 13,254 Vendor 0.69 0.30 11.1 5.38 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 9,639 9,639 0.34 1.43 3.13 10,076 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.169. Building Construction (2038) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 163 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.97 0.81 6.89 12.5 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.97 0.81 6.89 12.5 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.14 — 0.14 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.58 4.92 8.90 0.02 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 0.90 1.62 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.6 20.2 16.0 329 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 115,449 115,449 0.88 0.66 99.6 115,768 Vendor 5.29 2.35 79.0 39.1 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 79,176 79,176 2.77 11.3 50.3 82,650 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 20.6 20.4 16.4 276 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 109,522 109,522 0.88 0.66 2.58 109,743 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 164 / 293
Vendor 5.21 2.19 82.5 40.1 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 79,257 79,257 2.77 11.3 1.31 82,682 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.7 14.4 11.7 208 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 79,372 79,372 0.63 0.47 30.7 79,559 Vendor 3.78 1.62 58.7 28.2 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 56,579 56,579 1.98 8.04 15.5 59,040 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.68 2.63 2.14 37.9 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,141 13,141 0.10 0.08 5.08 13,172 Vendor 0.69 0.30 10.7 5.15 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 9,367 9,367 0.33 1.33 2.57 9,775 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.171. Building Construction (2039) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 6.78 12.4 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 6.78 12.4 0.02 0.15 — 0.15 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 165 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.57 4.84 8.86 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.10 0.88 1.62 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 19.9 19.7 11.9 320 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 114,679 114,679 0.88 0.66 85.7 114,983 Vendor 5.29 2.35 77.1 38.2 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 77,120 77,120 2.77 11.3 40.7 80,584 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 19.9 19.7 16.4 266 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 108,792 108,792 0.88 0.66 2.21 109,013 Vendor 5.13 2.19 80.6 39.2 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 77,203 77,203 2.77 11.3 1.06 80,627 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 14.2 13.9 11.6 201 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 78,839 78,839 0.63 0.47 26.3 79,021 Vendor 3.72 1.62 58.0 27.6 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 55,110 55,110 1.98 8.04 12.5 57,568 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.60 2.54 2.11 36.6 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 13,053 13,053 0.10 0.08 4.36 13,083 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 166 / 293
Vendor 0.68 0.30 10.6 5.04 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 9,124 9,124 0.33 1.33 2.07 9,531 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.173. Building Construction (2040) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 6.71 12.4 0.02 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.80 6.71 12.4 0.02 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.57 4.80 8.87 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.88 1.62 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 167 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 19.1 18.8 11.9 311 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 113,999 113,999 0.66 0.66 73.4 114,286 Vendor 5.29 2.35 76.0 38.2 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 75,279 75,279 2.77 11.3 32.5 78,735 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.8 18.6 16.2 261 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 108,153 108,153 0.88 0.66 1.90 108,374 Vendor 5.05 2.19 79.6 39.1 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 75,362 75,362 2.77 11.3 0.84 78,787 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 13.5 13.3 11.6 197 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 78,591 78,591 0.63 0.47 22.7 78,771 Vendor 3.73 1.63 56.8 27.7 0.59 0.59 22.2 22.8 0.59 6.14 6.73 — 53,943 53,943 1.99 8.06 10.0 56,405 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.46 2.43 2.12 36.0 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 13,012 13,012 0.10 0.08 3.76 13,041 Vendor 0.68 0.30 10.4 5.05 0.11 0.11 4.05 4.16 0.11 1.12 1.23 — 8,931 8,931 0.33 1.33 1.66 9,339 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.175. Building Construction (2041) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 168 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.80 6.65 12.3 0.02 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.80 6.65 12.3 0.02 0.14 — 0.14 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.57 4.75 8.81 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.87 1.61 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.4 14.1 11.7 302 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 113,411 113,411 0.66 0.44 62.9 113,622 Vendor 4.47 2.35 74.0 37.2 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 73,634 73,634 2.69 11.3 25.9 77,081 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 18.6 14.1 12.1 255 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 107,597 107,597 0.88 0.66 1.63 107,817 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 169 / 293
Vendor 4.22 2.19 77.6 38.2 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 73,718 73,718 2.69 11.3 0.67 77,140 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 13.0 9.91 8.65 190 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 77,974 77,974 0.63 0.47 19.4 78,149 Vendor 3.13 1.68 55.2 26.9 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 52,621 52,621 1.92 8.04 7.99 55,073 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.37 1.81 1.58 34.7 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 12,909 12,909 0.10 0.08 3.22 12,939 Vendor 0.57 0.31 10.1 4.91 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 8,712 8,712 0.32 1.33 1.32 9,118 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.177. Building Construction (2042) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.79 6.60 12.3 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.79 6.60 12.3 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 170 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.57 4.72 8.81 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.86 1.61 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.9 13.7 11.7 292 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 112,889 112,889 0.66 0.44 54.1 113,091 Vendor 4.39 2.43 73.0 36.4 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 72,183 72,183 2.69 10.4 20.9 75,380 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.9 13.4 12.1 246 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 107,103 107,103 0.88 0.66 1.40 107,323 Vendor 4.22 2.19 76.6 37.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 72,269 72,269 2.69 10.4 0.54 75,445 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.7 9.60 8.50 187 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 77,615 77,615 0.63 0.47 16.7 77,788 Vendor 3.08 1.68 54.5 26.3 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 51,585 51,585 1.92 7.45 6.46 53,860 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.31 1.75 1.55 34.1 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 12,850 12,850 0.10 0.08 2.76 12,879 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 171 / 293
Vendor 0.56 0.31 9.95 4.80 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 8,540 8,540 0.32 1.23 1.07 8,917 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.179. Building Construction (2043) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.94 0.79 6.55 12.3 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.94 0.79 6.55 12.3 0.02 0.13 — 0.13 0.12 — 0.12 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 4.68 8.77 0.02 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.85 1.60 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 172 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.5 13.2 11.7 288 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 112,425 112,425 0.66 0.44 46.3 112,620 Vendor 4.39 2.43 72.1 36.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 70,915 70,915 2.69 10.4 17.1 74,108 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.7 13.4 11.9 241 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 106,667 106,667 0.88 0.66 1.20 106,887 Vendor 4.22 2.27 75.7 37.3 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 71,001 71,001 2.69 10.4 0.44 74,178 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.7 9.60 8.50 183 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 77,298 77,298 0.47 0.47 14.3 77,465 Vendor 3.08 1.68 53.9 26.3 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 50,679 50,679 1.92 7.45 5.27 52,953 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.31 1.75 1.55 33.4 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 12,798 12,798 0.08 0.08 2.36 12,825 Vendor 0.56 0.31 9.83 4.80 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 8,391 8,391 0.32 1.23 0.87 8,767 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.181. Building Construction (2044) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 173 / 293
Off-Road
Equipment

0.93 0.78 6.48 12.2 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.93 0.78 6.48 12.2 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 4.64 8.76 0.02 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,717 1,717 0.07 0.01 — 1,723 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.85 1.60 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 284 284 0.01 < 0.005 — 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.5 13.2 11.5 283 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 112,032 112,032 0.66 0.44 39.7 112,219 Vendor 4.39 2.43 71.1 35.5 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 69,803 69,803 2.69 10.4 13.9 72,993 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.5 13.0 11.9 241 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 106,294 106,294 0.66 0.66 1.03 106,509 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 174 / 293
Vendor 4.22 2.27 74.8 36.5 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 69,890 69,890 2.61 10.4 0.36 73,065 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.4 9.31 8.52 180 0.00 0.00 92.5 92.5 0.00 21.7 21.7 — 77,240 77,240 0.47 0.47 12.3 77,405 Vendor 3.08 1.69 53.3 25.7 0.59 0.59 22.2 22.8 0.59 6.14 6.73 — 50,022 50,022 1.93 7.47 4.28 52,301 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.26 1.70 1.55 32.9 0.00 0.00 16.9 16.9 0.00 3.95 3.95 — 12,788 12,788 0.08 0.08 2.03 12,815 Vendor 0.56 0.31 9.73 4.69 0.11 0.11 4.05 4.16 0.11 1.12 1.23 — 8,282 8,282 0.32 1.24 0.71 8,659 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.183. Building Construction (2045) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.92 0.77 6.42 12.2 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.92 0.77 6.42 12.2 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 175 / 293
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.66 0.55 4.59 8.68 0.02 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01 — 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.84 1.58 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 283 283 0.01 < 0.005 — 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 17.1 12.6 11.5 283 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 111,680 111,680 0.66 0.44 34.0 111,862 Vendor 4.31 2.35 70.2 35.5 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 68,841 68,841 1.79 10.4 11.2 72,006 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 16.8 12.6 11.9 236 0.00 0.00 131 131 0.00 30.6 30.6 — 105,962 105,962 0.66 0.66 0.88 106,177 Vendor 4.06 2.19 73.8 36.4 0.82 0.82 31.3 32.1 0.82 8.64 9.47 — 68,929 68,929 1.79 10.4 0.29 72,083 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 12.0 8.97 8.34 179 0.00 0.00 92.2 92.2 0.00 21.6 21.6 — 76,789 76,789 0.47 0.47 10.5 76,952 Vendor 3.02 1.62 52.5 25.6 0.59 0.59 22.1 22.7 0.59 6.12 6.71 — 49,199 49,199 1.28 7.45 3.46 51,455 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 2.20 1.64 1.52 32.7 0.00 0.00 16.8 16.8 0.00 3.94 3.94 — 12,713 12,713 0.08 0.08 1.74 12,740 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 176 / 293
Vendor 0.55 0.30 9.59 4.67 0.11 0.11 4.04 4.15 0.11 1.12 1.22 — 8,145 8,145 0.21 1.23 0.57 8,519 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.185. Paving (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.04 0.88 8.06 10.0 0.01 0.41 — 0.41 0.38 — 0.38 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.16 1.45 1.80 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 272 272 0.01 < 0.005 — 273 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.26 0.33 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 45.1 45.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.2 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 177 / 293
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 205 205 0.01 0.01 0.02 208 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 37.5 37.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 38.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.21 6.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.29 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.187. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.01 0.85 7.81 10.0 0.01 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 178 / 293
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.01 0.85 7.81 10.0 0.01 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.73 0.61 5.60 7.18 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,083 1,083 0.04 0.01 — 1,086 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 0.11 1.02 1.31 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 180 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 212 212 0.01 0.01 0.84 215 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 179 / 293
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 0.01 0.01 0.02 203 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 146 146 0.01 0.01 0.26 148 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 24.2 24.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 24.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.189. Paving (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.95 0.80 7.45 9.98 0.01 0.35 — 0.35 0.32 — 0.32 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 180 / 293
Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.57 5.32 7.13 0.01 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,080 1,080 0.04 0.01 — 1,083 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.97 1.30 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.06 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 0.01 0.01 0.76 210 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 197 197 0.01 0.01 0.02 199 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 143 143 0.01 0.01 0.23 144 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 181 / 293
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.191. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.76 7.12 9.94 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.76 7.12 9.94 0.01 0.32 — 0.32 0.29 — 0.29 — 1,511 1,511 0.06 0.01 — 1,516 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.65 0.54 5.08 7.10 0.01 0.23 — 0.23 0.21 — 0.21 — 1,079 1,079 0.04 0.01 — 1,083 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 182 / 293
Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.12 0.10 0.93 1.30 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 179 179 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 203 203 0.01 0.01 0.69 206 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.07 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 193 193 0.01 0.01 0.02 195 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 140 140 0.01 0.01 0.21 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 23.1 23.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 23.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lawndale General Plan Update Detailed Report, 7/11/2023 183 / 293
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Lawndale City CouncilDecember 18, 2023

Lawndale City Council
December 18, 2023