Agenda packet — Lawndale City Council, October 7, 2024

CITY OF LAWNDALE

AGENDA OF THE LAWNDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Monday, October 7, 2024, 6:30 PM
14717 Burin Ave
Lawndale, CA 90260
Any person who wishes to address the City Council regarding any item listed on this agenda or any other matter that is within its subject matter jurisdiction is invited, but not required, to fill out a Public Meeting Speaker Card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the oral communications portion of the meeting. The purpose of the card is to ensure that the speaker’s name is correctly recorded in the meeting minutes and, where appropriate, to provide contact information for staff follow-up.

How to observe the Meeting:

To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can now observe the meeting in person. Members of the public are still able to view the meeting on YouTube “Lawndale CityTV”, the City Website, Lawndale Community Cable Television on Spectrum and Frontier Channel 3.

Notice of Remote Participation:

Remote participation by the public is available through Zoom.

To access the meeting remotely from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone, or Android device use this URL:
https://zoom.us/j/92917899693?pwd=ahdDyFStc8K3XYF4Bi6D7JaP9Sv4JJ.1 To request to speak, use the “raise hand” icon by rolling over the bottom of the screen.

To join by One tap mobile dial: +16699009128,,92917899693#,,,,*491967# or +16694449171,,92917899693#,,,,*491967#
To join by phone dial 1-669-900-9128 or 1-669-444-9171
Webinar ID: 929 1789 9693 Passcode: 491967
If you wish to comment during the public comment portion of the agenda, press *9 and wait to be recognized by the Mayor. Attendees will be muted until the public participation period is opened. When you are called on to speak, press *6 to unmute your line. Please note that comments from the public are limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

Copies of this Agenda may be obtained prior to the meeting inside the Lawndale City Hall foyer or on the City Website. Interested parties may contact the City Clerk Department at (310) 973-3213 for clarification regarding individual agenda items.

This Agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours before the meeting.

A. CALL TO ORDER: REMOTE PARTICIPATION UNDER AB 2449: To receive a report from the City Attorney regarding a request from a Council Member to participate in a meeting remotely due to Just Cause pursuant to AB 2449 (Government Code Section 54953(f)). Mayor Pro Tem Suarez will participate virtually under Just Cause pursuant to AB 2449 (Government Code Section 54953(f).

B. ROLL CALL
C. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
D. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update

2. Los Angeles County Fire Department Update
E. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) F. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
G. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items 3 through 8 will be considered and acted upon under one motion unless a City Councilmember removes individual items for further City Council consideration or explanation.

3. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda — Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

4. Accounts Payable Register
— Recommendation: that the City Council adopt Resolution No. CC-2410-096 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $807,004.51.

5. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, September 16, 2024 — Recommendation: that City Council approve the minutes.

6. Approval of Beautification Committee Resolution
— Recommendation: that the City Council approve staff recommendations to approve Resolution No. CC-2410-097 which makes changes to the Beautification Committee, including lowering membership from seven members to five members and changing requirements to remove inactive members.

7. Notice of Completion for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project — Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Accept the project completion by Sequel Contractors, Inc., for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project; 2.) Authorize staff to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder County Clerk’s Office for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation; and 3.) Authorize staff to release the project retention to the contractor in the amount of $101,432.69 for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project.

8. Approve Resolution No CC-2410-098 Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants — Recommendation: that City Council adopt Resolution No. CC-2410-098 authorizing the submittal of applications for the California State Department of Recycling and Resources Recovery (CalRecycle) Grant Programs and related authorizations.

This authorization is effective until rescinded by the Signature Authority or by the City Council.

H. ADMINISTRATION

9. Execute a Cooperative Agreement with Los Angeles County for the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project and Appropriate Additional Funding
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement (Attachment B) between the City of Lawndale and Los Angeles County; and 2.) authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $30,000 to the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project account 272-310-700.309 for a total project budget of $200,000.

10. Approval of Renewal Agreement with Los Angeles County Animal Control for After Hours Use — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the City-County Municipal Services Agreement with the County on Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control and authorize the Mayor to execute it on behalf of the City and authorize the City Manager to execute the Service Level Request on behalf of the City.

11. ESMoA Grant Letter
— Recommendation: that the City Council approve a Letter of Recommendation for Experimentally Structured Museum of Art (ESMoA) to be submitted with their grant application to the Los Angeles County Department of Arts and Culture.

12. Authorize the Purchase of Food Scrap Kitchen Pails for the Residential Organics Program utilizing SB 1383 Program Grant Funds
— Recommendation: that the City Council authorize the purchase of food scrap kitchen pails from HTT Apparel for a total cost of $29,850.19 funded by the SB 1383 grant funds in compliance with the Local Assistance Grant Program guidelines.

I. CITY MANAGER REPORT
J. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

13. 30-day Amnesty Program for Residential Properties Out of Compliance Requested by Mayor Pullen-Miles.
— Recommendation: that the City Council consider the 30-day Amnesty Program for Residential Properties and direct staff to advertise and implement the program; or provide further direction to staff.

14. Mayor/City Councilmembers Report of Attendance at Meetings and/or Events K. CLOSED SESSION

15. Public Employee Performance Evaluation - City Manager — The City Council will hold a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b), to conduct an employee evaluation concerning the City Manager.

16. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation — The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4), to discuss the potential initiation of litigation: one (1) case.

17. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation — The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with legal counsel regarding a significant exposure to litigation, the facts and circumstances of which are not known to the potential plaintiff.

L. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, October 21, 2024, in the Lawndale City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

It is the intention of the City of Lawndale to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, we will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the City Clerk Department (310) 973- 3213 prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.

Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodation to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held on October 7, 2024, was posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /s/ Yvette Palomo
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Date Posted: October 3, 2024

Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda

BACKGROUND
California Government Code reads, in part, as follows:
"Except when, after reading the title, further reading is waived by regular motion adopted by majority vote, all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of introduction or passage."

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2410-096 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $807,004.51.

Attachments
A. CC-2410-096 - AP Resolution - Oct. 07, 2024.pdf

Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, September 16, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the minutes.

Attachments
City Council 9-16-24 Minutes.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

DRAFT MINUTES

LAWNDALE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
September 16, 2024

1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Pullen-Miles called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

Councilmembers Present: Mayor Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor Pro Tem Bernadette Suarez, Councilmember Rhonda Hofmann Gorman, Councilmember Sirley Cuevas, Councilmember Pat Kearney Other Participants: City Manager Sean M. Moore, City Attorney Gregory M. Murphy, City Clerk Erica Harbison, Assistant City Clerk Yvette Palomo, Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Raylette Felton, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Captain Nicole Palomino, Los Angeles County Fire Department Acting Assistant Fire Chief Brian Kane, Municipal Services Director Michael Reyes, Finance Director Hrant Manuelian, Community Services Director Jason Minter, Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez, Interim Planning Manager Peter Kann

2. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
Mayor Pro Tem Suarez led the flag salute. Pastor Dwight Dudley of Calvary Chapel South Bay provided the inspiration.

3. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
3A. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update
Captain Palomino summarized the recent law enforcement activities.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked about best practices when illegal activity is suspected.

Captain Palomino responded that illegal activity should be reported to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD).

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman commended Captain Palomino for receiving a score of 5.0 among deputies at the South Los Angeles Sheriff's Station.

Mayor Pullen-Miles asked how often Driving Under the Influence (DUI) checkpoints are done.

Captain Palomino responded that checkpoint events are determined by funding. 3B. Los Angeles County Fire Department Update
Acting Assistant Fire Chief Brian Kane summarized the recent fire department activities.

4. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) Lynne Pope, Hermosa Beach Resident/Realtor, commented on permit issues that she is assisting her client with.

Sandro, Resident, commented in favor of having Larry R. Rudolph Park in the community and recent negative activities that he observed at the park.
page 1 5
Grace, Resident, commented on being concerned for her safety while visiting Larry R. Rudolph Park due to a recent incident she experienced.

Andrew Blackney, Resident, commented on the management of the City and restrictions placed on staff who support candidates running for election.

Anonymous, Resident, commented on lack of funds, safety at parks, graffiti in the City and slow permit processes.

Holly Osborne, Redondo Beach Resident, commented on the San Diego Freeway (I-405) Improvement Project.

Sandra Suarez, Resident, commented on code violation notices her neighbors have received, her opposition to the City management and recent salary increases.

Eddie Cortez, Hawthorne Resident, commented on the declining safety within the City.

Abram Randall, Resident, commented on the partnership the City has with the South Bay 25 Club and the donation the Club receives from firework sales.

Rodrigo Lever, Resident, commented on missing building documents.

Linda Nolan, Senior Travel Club President, thanked the City Council and staff for their support, commented on membership qualifications and past and future excursions.

Maria Reyes, Resident, commented in favor of the City offering more youth activities.

Carla Mendez, commented on privacy hedges on her property and safety concerns.

5. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
Councilmember Cuevas thanked everyone that spoke at tonight's meeting, asked for the status of the report indicating the cost to staff parks, how parks surveillance video is reviewed, if the Fireworks Ad-hoc Subcommittee has met, how Community Development documents can be misplaced, and asked about property hedges compliance.

City Manager Moore responded that staff will present a parks staffing cost report at the next meeting, quality of life concerns such as park safety will be addressed by staff, a Fireworks Ad-hoc Subcommittee meeting will be scheduled soon, staff is working with residents on locating misplaced documents, and that hedge height requirements will be reviewed.

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman thanked everyone that attended tonight's meeting, invited residents to join the Neighborhood Watch Committee and commented in opposition of the San Diego Freeway (I-405) Improvement Project.

Municipal Services Director Reyes commented that staff and Southwest Patrol patrol the City seven days a week and can be reached at 310-973-3220 by leaving a voice message.

Captain Palomino commented that patrol units are aware of activities at Larry R. Rudolph Park and patrol checks are being done.

Councilmember Kearney thanked everyone that spoke at tonight's meeting, encouraged residents 50 years and older to join the Lawndale Travel Club, and encouraged residents to attend the Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) meetings.
page 2
Mayor Pro Tem Suarez thanked everyone that attended tonight's meeting, and commented that she will not stop fighting for her community.

Mayor Pullen-Miles thanked everyone that attended tonight's meeting, commented that everyone should feel comfortable speaking to the City Council, spoke on reviewing the privacy hedges issue, misplaced documents, and supporting the Lawndale Travel Club. Mayor Pullen-Miles provided information about the YAC, spoke about the upcoming Youth Development Center (YDC), and safety in the community.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Cuevas asked if a Community Development Director has been hired.

City Manager Moore responded that a Community Development Director has not been hired.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman to approve the Consent Calendar items 6.A through 7.A. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 6A. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda
-Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.
6B. Accounts Payable Register
-Recommendation: that City Council adopt Resolution No. CC-2409-091 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $1,476,170.83.
6C. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, August 19, 2024 -Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes. 6D. Approval of Routine Records Destruction
-Recommendation: that the City Council adopt Resolution No.CC-2409-092, approving the requests from the City Clerk’s Department, City Manager’s Office, Finance Department and Municipal Services Department for authorization to destroy routine records as listed in the exhibit of the resolution. 6E. Appointment to Vacancy on the South Bay Workforce Investment Board Lawndale Business Private Sector Seat
-Recommendation: that the City Council re-affirm the SBWIB's nomination for appointment of Ms. Christina Q. Smith, Founder & CEO of Curly Gurl Luv Beauty Supply, as the City of Lawndale representative on the SBWIB Business Private Sector seat, for a new term beginning July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2028. The exact term start date will be effective upon ratification by the City of Inglewood, currently serving as the Administrative Entity for all member cities in the SBWIB jurisdiction. 6F. Consideration of Claim for Damage
-Recommendation: that the City Council reject the claim filed by Jose A. Calderon and instruct staff to process the appropriate correspondence to the claimant. 6G. Update to Job Description for Director of Community Development page 3
-Recommendation: that the City Council approve and adopt Resolution No. CC-2409-094, updating the job description for the Director of Community Development position.

7. LAWNDALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

CONSENT CALENDAR
7A. Minutes of the Lawndale Public Financing Authority, September 18, 2023 -Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes.

See the motion made previously under 6. Consent Calendar.

8. ADMINISTRATION

CITY COUNCIL
8A. Approve First Amendment to Contract Services Agreement with Michael Baker International for Planning Manager Services
-Recommendation: that City Council: a) approve the first amendment to the contract services agreement with Michael Baker International for Professional Planning Manager Services in a maximum contract sum not to exceed $202,800; and b) approve the budget amendment of $202,800 in account 279-410-530.100.

City Manager Moore presented the staff report.

Councilmember Cuevas asked for clarification on the cost, services and covered timeframe.

City Manager Moore responded that the Planning Manager will work full-time while recruitment is done for the position, the salary covers six months and will be paid by project site plan reviews and entitlement projects; therefore, there will be limited impact on the General Funds account.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked for an explanation on the services and costs from the proposals received.

Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Felton responded that Michael Baker International, Inc. was the only company that was able to provide a Planning Manager in a timely manner.

Discussion ensured among the City Councilmembers, Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Felton, and City Attorney Murphy regarding the requests for proposals, cost, purchasing policy and City Council approval.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman to approve the first amendment to the contract services agreement with Michael Baker International for Professional Planning Manager Services in a maximum contract sum not to exceed $202,800; and approve the budget amendment of $202,800 in account 279-410-530.100. The motion passed by a vote of 3-1-1- 0 with Mayor Pro Tem Suarez voting no and Councilmember Cuevas abstaining. 8B. First Amendment to Contract Services Agreement with Civic Solutions for Professional Planning Services
-Recommendation: that City Council approve the first amendment to the contract services agreement with City Solutions, Inc. for professional planning services for a maximum contract sum do not exceed $108,550 and approve the budget amendment to account 279-410-530.100 for $208,550.

City Manager Moore presented the staff report.
page 4
Councilmember Cuevas asked for clarification on the duties, timeframe, funding, if permits will be processed faster, and if someone will be hired for this position.

City Manager Moore responded that this position is a six month temporary assignment, they will do site plan reviews, zoning checks, setback checks and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) checks, funds will be directly billed out of site plan review projects, they are processing permits in a timely manner and there are no plans to hire a permanent staff for this position.

Mayor Pullen-Miles asked what the plan is when the contract expires.

City Manager Moore responded that they will evaluate the need for the position as the contract nears expiration.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) can provide some of these services and if the City has contacted them.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers and City Manager Moore about the services the position will provide, processing permits in a timely manner, and hiring a Community Development Director.

A motion was made by Councilmember Cuevas and seconded by Councilmember Kearney to approve the first amendment to the contract services agreement with Civic Solutions, Inc. for professional planning services for a maximum contract sum not to exceed $108,550 and approve the budget amendment to account 279-410-530.100 for $108,550. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 8C. Lease Agreement with the Sheriff's Department
-Recommendation: that the City Council approve the Extension of the Lease Agreement for 15331 Prairie Ave. Lawndale, CA between the Sheriff’s Department and the City of Lawndale for an additional five years.

Municipal Services Director Reyes presented the staff report.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked if Los Angeles County areas receive assistance from the Service Center and how much services are provided to Los Angeles County residents.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that the public can visit the Service Center, and if assistance is required a deputy corresponding to their area of residence would assist.

Lieutenant Osborne responded that when residents requests services a deputy from the corresponding jurisdiction is dispatched.

Councilmember Cuevas and Mayor Pro Tem Suarez commented that they have received complaints about the Service Center being closed to the public.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that he will find out about public access service hours.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Suarez and Councilmember Kearney to approve the Extension of the Lease Agreement for 15331 Prairie Ave. Lawndale, CA between the Sheriff’s Department and the City of Lawndale for an additional five years. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 8D. Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement #D1104 for Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program
-Recommendation: that City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement #D1104 for Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program.

Public Works Director Lucho presented the staff report. page 5
Councilmember Cuevas asked if there is a draft of the plan and if residents can be involved in selecting a design.

Public Works Director Lucho responded that the project is currently in the planning phase, it will be presented once it is ready and that residents will be included in the design selection process.

A motion was made by Councilmember Cuevas and seconded by Councilmember Kearney to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Cooperative Agreement #D1104 for Metro Active Transport (MAT) Program. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
8E. Execute a Cooperative Agreement with Los Angeles County for the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project and Appropriate Additional Funding -Recommendation: that the City Council that the City Council 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement (Attachment B) between the City of Lawndale and Los Angeles County; and 2) Authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $30,000.00 to the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project for a total project budget of $200,000.00.

Public Works Director Lucho presented the staff report.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if appropriating the requested funds would take away from other planned projects.

Public Works Director Lucho responded no.

Councilmember Kearney asked how much the City of Hawthorne is allocating towards this project.

Public Works Director Lucho responded that the cost is divided by the affected cities.

City Manager Moore commented that the SBCCOG brought this item forward.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers about the amount of work that needs to be done and the cost in comparison to the City of Hawthorne.

By consensus, the City Councilmembers directed staff to bring the item back with project cost information for the City of Hawthorne.
8F. Beautification Committee Amendment
-Staff recommends that the City Council approve staff recommendations to lower the required minimum number of Beautification Committee members from seven members to five members, and to include a provision that allow Beautification Committee members to be removed for excessive absences.

Municipal Services Director Reyes presented the staff report.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if exceptions are made when members are absent due to medical reasons, when are members notified when meetings are canceled due to lack of a quorum, how are members recruited and asked about restrictions for members of the same family joining the committee.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that exceptions to removing members for excessive absences are made for medical reasons, members are notified before the meeting when a quorum will not be met, recruitment is announced at City events and explained that there are restrictions in place prohibiting family members from serving on the same committee; however, families can volunteer at events.
page 6
Mayor Pullen-Miles opened public comments.

Olga Sierra Gonzalez, Beautification Committee Chairperson, commented in favor of lowering the required minimum number of members from seven to five and asked the City Councilmembers for assistance in promoting the Beautification Committee.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if residents would be inclined in attending Beautification Committee events if there were incentives.

Olga Sierra Gonzalez, Beautification Committee Chairperson, responded that yes, residents would be inclined to participate if incentives were provided.

Mayor Pullen-Miles closed public comments.

City Attorney Murphy commented that a new item will need to be brought forward to allocate funding to the Beautification Committee for incentives.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez commented in favor of discussing allocating funds to the Beautification Committee at a future meeting.

Mayor Pullen-Miles suggested that the Beautification Committee build a relationship with Angie Environmental Charter High School.

A motion was made by Councilmember Cuevas and seconded by Councilmember Kearney to approve staff recommendations to lower the required minimum number of Beautification Committee members from seven members to five members, and to include a provision that allow Committee members to be removed for excessive absences. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 8G. Fireworks Suppression Plan Update
-Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file this staff report.

Municipal Services Director Reyes presented the staff report.

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman commented on the urgency for the Fireworks Ad Hoc Committee to meet.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked if the illegal fireworks citations that were not appealed paid, and if any citations are waived before the appeal process.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that 11 citations have been paid, everyone that appeals goes through the complete appeal process and commented that there is an option to appeal the citation at a court of law to bypass the City's appeals process.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers and Municipal Services Director Reyes regarding the options to appeal, the appeals process, payments of citations and evidence that may be used to appeal citations.

Councilmember Cuevas asked how the outstanding citations are collected.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that the management system Data Ticket, Inc. processes all City citations by following regular collection procedures.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers and Municipal Services Director Reyes regarding interest and penalties for non-payment, citing the same address multiple times, and notifying citation recipients of page 7
consequences for non-payment.

By consensus, the City Councilmembers received and filed this staff report. 8H. Adopt a Resolution Approving a Transfer Agreement Between the Los Angeles County Flood Control District and The City of Lawndale For Agreement No. 2024MP44 Safe, Clean Water Program
-Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) authorize the City Manager to execute the Transfer Agreement and related documents; and 2.) adopt the attached Resolution No. CC-2409-093 approving a Transfer Agreement between the City of Lawndale, Agreement No. 2024MP44, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the City’s annual allocation of funds from the Safe Clean Water (SCW) Program.

Public Works Director Lucho presented the staff report.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman to authorize the City Manager to execute the Transfer Agreement and related documents; and adopt the attached Resolution No. CC-2409-093 approving a Transfer Agreement between the City of Lawndale, Agreement No. 2024MP44, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District for the City’s annual allocation of funds from the Safe Clean Water (SCW) Program. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0. 8I. Fund 286 SB1383 Local Assistance Program Grant Budget Amendment -Recommendation: that the City Council authorize Public Works staff to recognize the grant revenues and authorize the expenditure of the grant funds in compliance with the Local Assistance Grant Program guidelines.

Public Works Director Lucho presented the staff report.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if $135,000 is the grand total of the grant, is there a deadline to utilize the funds, and if is there a plan to educate residents about the program.

Public Works Director Lucho responded that $135,000 is the grand total of the grant, grant guidelines require the City to provide receptables to residents, and that he plans to provide an educational class.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers and Public Works Director Lucho about providing receptables to households, and the formats in which to provide on-going educational resources to residents.

Councilmember Kearney asked if Republic Services should be responsible for this project.

Public Works Director Lucho responded that this resource is funded by a grant awarded to the City for this purposes.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez commented that a State of California Law was passed which mandates organic waste collection, it was implemented in phases, paper bags can be used and asked City Attorney Murphy to explain the new law.

City Attorney Murphy responded that the law is SB 1383, and that grant funds were provided to cities under the implementation of the bill to assist waste haulers with outreach efforts.

Mayor Pullen-Miles commented that this resource is separate from Republic Services' obligation, waste haulers will not collect the trash if there is incorrect waste in bins and asked how City and resident compliance can be measured.
page 8
Public Works Director Lucho responded that the City will comply by providing educational resources using the grant funds and Republic Services will provide a report.

A motion was made by Councilmember Cuevas and seconded by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman to authorize Public Works staff to recognize the grant revenues and authorize the expenditure of the grant funds in compliance with the Local Assistance Grant Program guidelines. The motion passed by a vote of 5-

0. 8J. Purchase of Vehicle for Community Development Department using American Rescue Plan Act Funding
-Recommendation: that City Council approve the purchase of a vehicle for the Community Development Department and approve the budget amendment of $40,000 in account number 285-410-550.300 ARPA Vehicles.

Finance Director Manuelian presented the staff report.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Suarez's question, Finance Director Manuelian replied that a vehicle is being replaced.

Councilmember Cuevas asked if there is another vehicle that is not in use, and is the vehicle to be replaced going to be sold.

Finance Director Manuelian responded that the vehicle to be replaced will be auctioned and the funds placed in the General Funds account, and that there is no additional vehicle available for use.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers about selling the vehicle, the amount it would sell for and the funds to be used to purchase the new vehicle.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Cuevas to approve the purchase of a vehicle for the Community Development Department and approve the budget amendment of $40,000 in account number 285-410-550.300 ARPA Vehicles. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.

9. LAWNDALE PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
9A. Annual Accounting of Lawndale Public Financing Authority Financial Activities -Recommendation: that the Board of the Lawndale Public Financing Authority receive and file the annual accounting of financial activities.

Finance Director Manuelian presented the staff report.

By consensus, the City Council received and filed the annual accounting of financial activities report.

10. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Moore announced that the Youth Development Center (YDC) design will be discussed at the Lawndale Community meeting scheduled to take place on September 21, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. at the Harold E. Hofmann Community Center, and the Parks, Recreation and Social Services Commission meeting scheduled to take place on September 23, 2024 at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. He announced that Clean-Up Week is scheduled September 21 - 29, 2024, Clean-Up day is scheduled for September 28, 2024 and bulky item pick up services will be provided at the Public Works facility.

11. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
11A. Consideration and Direction regarding Legislative Lobbyist RFP page 9
Requested by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman.
-Recommendation: that the City Council: 1) review and discuss the draft Request for Proposals (RFP); 2) provide further direction to staff on whether to proceed, with or without changes; or 3) take no action on this matter.

Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Felton presented the staff report.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked if there is a proposed budget, and if the services are long-term or short-term.

Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Felton responded that cost proposals will be requested when the Request for Proposal (RFP) is issued.

Councilmember Kearney asked if this item is to discuss the criteria to issue an RFP.

City Attorney Murphy recommended requesting an RFP for services through the end of the fiscal year and an RFP for an annual basis.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers about the services the position would provide, who would oversee the position, checking their references, scope of services, and the need for the position.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Hofmann Gorman to move forward and issue the Request for Proposals with the established criteria. The motion passed by a vote of 4-1-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Suarez voting no.
11B. American Rescue Plan Act Shop Local Rebate Incentive Requested by Mayor Pullen-Miles.
-Recommendation: that City Council approve this program and the budget amendment of $100,000 in account 285-190-545.204 ARPA Rebate Program.

Finance Director Manuelian presented the staff report.

Mayor Pullen-Miles commented that this program is funded with American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, it is an incentive for residents to shop locally, and requested that the program be limited to residents.

In response to Mayor Pro Tem Suarez's question, Finance Director Manuelian responded that the reimbursement would be cumulative up to $500.00.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers and Finance Director Manuelian about qualifying individuals and limiting qualifying purchases to home improvement.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked about the deadline to spend the ARPA funds.

Finance Director Manuelian responded that the funds are to be spent by December 2026, and that there is a plan to exhaust all funds by the deadline.

In response to Councilmember Cuevas, City Manager Moore responded that a copy of the final Shop Local Rebate Incentive plan will be provided to the City Council.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearny and seconded by Mayor Pullen-Miles to approve this program with modifications that the reimbursement be provided to residents for home improvement purchases only and the budget amendment of $100,000 in account 285-190-545.204 ARPA Rebate Program. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
page 10
11C. Public Notification Policy of Transparency of Contractors Requested by Mayor Pullen-Miles.

City Manager Moore provided background information on the topic.

Mayor Pullen-Miles commented that this item would require contractors to disclose if there are any complaints or actions against their business for consumer transparency matters.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked for clarification on what type of complaints would qualify to be disclosed.

Mayor Pullen-Miles responded that substantiated complaints are to be disclosed.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers on what type of complaints would need to be disclosed, who the information would benefit, the type of impact it would have, and whether it would be a requirement.

By consensus, the City Council directed staff to research the topic and present a report at the next City Council meeting.
11D. Mayor/City Councilmembers Report of Attendance at Meetings and/or Events Councilmember Cuevas attended the California Contract Cities Association (CCCA) Board of Director's meeting where she was recognized for completing the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department 2024 Contract City Council Academy, City of Hawthorne State of the City Address 2024, Town Hall Meeting:

Postal Services in Our Community hosted by Congresswoman Maxine Waters, City of Lawndale 11th Annual Blues Festival, thanked staff and volunteers for organizing a great event, asked Municipal Services Director Reyes about the art themes for the utility art box project, requested an agenda item be brought forth to staff parks, incentivize residents to participate in the Beautification Committee, and requested a review of the City Manager.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that the Beautification Committee is coordinating the utility art box project and determining the art themes.

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman attended the CCCA Legislative Committee meeting, CCCA Board of Director's meeting, City of Hawthorne State of the City Address 2024, CCCA Fall Educational Summit, CCCA Legislative Committee meeting, Neighborhood Watch meeting, City of Lawndale 11th Annual Blues Festival, requested the Neighborhood Watch meetings be scheduled consistently on the same week day, for it to be advertised more, and thanked staff for coordinating the Blues Festival event.Councilmember Kearney attended the CCCA Fall Educational Summit, Liability Trust Fund Oversight Committee Meeting, Local Travel Network Ad Hoc Subcommittee, Los Angeles County West Vector Control District Board of Trustees Meeting, City of Lawndale 11th Annual Blues Festival and a Senior's Luncheon.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez attended the Local Travel Network Ad Hoc Subcommittee, and the SBCCOG Board of Director's meeting.

Mayor Pullen-Miles attended the City of Lawndale 11th Annual Blues Festival, Neighborhood Watch meeting, City of Wilmington Labor Day Parade, City of Hawthorne State of the City Address 2024, Town Hall Meeting: Postal Services in Our Community hosted by Congresswoman Maxine Waters, CCCA Board of Directors meeting, thanked staff for coordinating the Blues Festival and retired Community Services Director Mike Estes for assisting.
page 11

12. CLOSED SESSION
12A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Pending Litigation -The City Council will conduct a closed session regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(3), because due to existing facts and circumstances, the legislative body of the local agency will meet to decide whether a closed session is authorized pursuant to paragraph (2).

City Attorney Murphy read the Closed Session matter by title only.

The City Council convened into closed session at 10:30 a.m.

The City Council reconvened from closed session at 11:10 p.m.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez was not present.

City Attorney Murphy announced that there was no reportable action for Closed Session Item No. 1AA Conference with Legal Counsel - Litigation.

13. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, Mayor Pullen-Miles adjourned the meeting at 11:12 p.m. _______________________
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
Approved: October 7, 2024
page 12

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michael Reyes, Municipal Services Director SUBJECT: Approval of Beautification Committee Resolution

BACKGROUND
The Beautification Committee consists of Lawndale residents that meet monthly to organize and plan events to help beautify the City and build social awareness through community programs. Some of the events that the Beautification Committee oversee are the twice-yearly Clean-up Week, the home decorating awards during the Christmas season and more recently, the art in public spaces program.

STAFF REVIEW
At the September 16
th City Council meeting, an item was brought before the Council to reduce the number of active members of the Lawndale Beautification Committee from seven active members to five active members. City Staff as well as the Beautification Committee Chairperson spoke about the difficulty in keeping members, and in getting appointed members to participate. At the September 16 th
, 2024, City
Council meeting, the Council voted in favor of reducing the number of active members within the Beautification Committee from seven members to five members, so that the active members that regularly participate would have an easier time holding meetings as this would allow for a smaller number of members for a quorum.

The Beautification Committee also sought to add a rule for removing members which would give active Beautification Committee members the ability expel any member that missed three consecutive meetings, or that missed two meetings without notifying the other members. The active Beautification Committee members felt that these two changes would allow for more efficient meetings, and also guarantee that public meetings do not need to be cancelled due to unplanned absences.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report and approves it to form.

FISCAL REVIEW
Staff anticipate no additional costs as a result of these recommendations.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve staff recommendations to approve Resolution No. CC2410-097 which makes changes to the Beautification Committee, including lowering membership from seven members to five members and changing requirements to remove inactive members.

Attachments
Resolution No. CC-2410-097.pdf

Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
Hrant Manuelian, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Nick Petrevski, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Notice of Completion for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project

BACKGROUND
On March 18, 2024, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Sequel Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $1,989,388.32, and a construction inspection services contract to SA Associates in the amount of $108,000.00 for a total project cost of $2,097,388.32. A 15% contingency was approved in the amount of $298,408.25.

The scope of work included surface repairs using 2-inch grind and overlay methods, reconstruction of localized asphalt pavement failures, removal and reconstruction of damaged curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveway approaches, cross gutters and ADA (Americans with Disabilities) curb ramps, and striping, manhole and valve adjustments, and traffic loop repairs.

STAFF REVIEW
The FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project was completed in conformance with the project plans and specifications by Sequel Contractors, Inc. The construction inspection services were performed by SA Associates and in-house staff. Construction began on May 15, 2024, and was completed on September 6, 2024. Staff recommends the City Council accept the work performed by Sequel Contractors, Inc. as complete and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project was included in the City’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program and was funded by SB1, CDBG, Measure M, Prop C, General Fund, and Priority Legislative Budget Projects (PLBP) Grant Funds for the total amount of $2,404,000.00. The amount of $217,000.00 in CDBG funds were transferred out to future street projects bringing the total funds budgeted for this project at $2,187,000.00. The project financials and accounting is summarized below:

Budgeted Amount Actual Cost
Construction Cost $1,989,388.32 $2,028,653.77
Construction Inspection Services $108,000.00 $98,050.00 Total Amount $2,097,388.32 $2,126,703.77
The project available funding summary was comprised of the following:

SB1 $522,000.00
General Fund $284,000.00
Prop C $259,000.00
Measure M $122,000.00
PLBP Grant $1,000,000.00
Total Project Available Funding $2,187,000.00
The total project cost of Construction ($2,028,653.77), including $39,265.45 of contingency funds, and Construction Inspections ($98,050.00) is $2,126,703.77

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the project completion by Sequel Contractors, Inc., for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project.

2. Authorize staff to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder County Clerk’s Office for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation.

3. Authorize staff to release the project retention to the contractor in the amount of $101,432.69 for the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation Project.

Attachments
A. Project Location Map.pdf
Attachment A
FY 22-23 Street Improvement Project Location Map
3 2
1 Project Location Map
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: Grace Huizar, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT:

Approve Resolution No CC-2410-098 Authorizing Submittal of Applications for All CalRecycle Grants

BACKGROUND
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) offers funding opportunities authorized by legislation to assist public and private entities in the safe and effective management of the recycling stream. Annually, the City applies for multiple grants with CalRecycle such as the City County Beverage Container Recycling Program, SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant, and the Used Oil Recycling Grant Programs.

STAFF REVIEW
CalRecycle requires a resolution be included with the submission of the annual grant applications. The resolution authorizes the submittal for any and all grant programs provided by CalRecycle in addition to recognizing the authorized signature authorities, which will be the City Manager or his/her designee. In addition, CalRecycle requires the resolution be updated every five years. The City last adopted a resolution on August 29, 2019 meeting CalRecycle requirements.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopt Resolution No. CC-2410-098 authorizing the submittal of applications for the California State Department of Recycling and Resources Recovery (CalRecycle) Grant Programs and related authorizations. This authorization is effective until rescinded by the Signature Authority or by the City Council.

Attachments
Authorizing Submittal of Apps for All CalRecycle Grants.pdf Attachment A
RESOLUTION NO. CC-2410-098

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL CALRECYCLE

GRANTS FOR WHICH CITY OF LAWNDALE IS ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code sections 48000 et seq. authorize the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various grant programs (grants) in furtherance of the State of California’s (state) efforts to reduce, recycle and reuse solid waste generated in the state thereby preserving landfill capacity and protecting public health and safety and the environment; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the application, awarding, and management of the grants; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle grants.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE authorizes the submittal of application(s) to CalRecycle for all grants for which City of Lawndale is eligible; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of Lawndale all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these authorizations are effective for five (5) years from the date of adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 2024. _________________________
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:

State of California
County of Los Angeles
City of Lawndale
)
)
)
ss
I, Erica Harbison, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, California do hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lawndale duly approved and adopted the foregoing Resolution No. CC-2410-098 at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 7 th day of October 2024,
by the following roll call vote:

Name Voting Present, Not Voting Absent Ave No Abstain Not Participating Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
Bernadette Suarez, Mayor Pro Tem
Pat Kearney
Rhonda Hofinann-Gorman
Sirlev Cuevas
Erica Harbison, City Clerk Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney

Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
Hrant Manuelian, Finance Director/City Treasurer
Nick Petrevski, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:

Execute a Cooperative Agreement with Los Angeles County for the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project and Appropriate Additional Funding

BACKGROUND
On March 15, 2021, Los Angeles County (LA County) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU P00F3310, Attachment A) with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) where LA County is sharing with cities the funding provided for in County/LACMTA MOU to finance a portion of the Two Million Nine Hundred Forty Three Thousand Eight Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($2,943,800.00) estimated cost of the Traffic Signal Synchronization project (TSSP) on Rosecrans Avenue.

Under the MOU, LACMTA will provide to LA County a grant of up to a maximum of One Million Six Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Three Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($1,648,300.00). The City of Lawndale will receive Five Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($594,600.00) for its share.

In addition, LA County agrees to contribute funds in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty-Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($239,800.00) to finance a portion of the City of Lawndale’s One Million Twenty Thousand Nine Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($1,020,900.00) total obligation for the project. The City of Lawndale’s remaining obligation to cover the cost of the project after the Grant share and the County's contribution are applied is One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred and 0/100 Dollars ($186,500.00) as shown in table below:

City Total Cost of
project by City
LACMTA Grant LA County
Grant
Final Estimated
contribution by
City *
Gardena $1,750,400 $1,001,100 $416,800 $332,500
Hawthorne $133,500 $52,600 $64,400 $16,500
Lawndale $1,020,900 $594,600 $239,800 $186,500
Los Angeles $5,500 $5,500
LA County $33,500 $33,500
Total $2,943,800.00 $1,648,300.00 $760,000.00
* This estimated cost may be higher at the time the project is bid in the future The cost sharing between the cities is based on jurisdictional split at each intersection. For the City of Lawndale there are two intersections within the city limit on this project. Firmona Ave./Ramona Ave. at Rosecrans Ave. And Jefferson Ave. at Rosecrans Ave. (Attachment D) The Firmona Ave./Ramona Ave. Intersection is shared between the City of Hawthorne (15.6%) and the City of Lawndale (84.4%), and the Jefferson Ave. intersection is entirely within the City of Lawndale, therefore increasing the City of Lawndale contribution when compared to neighboring cuties.

STAFF REVIEW
Upon the City of Lawndale City Council approval, The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) is set to perform a Traffic Signal Synchronization Project (TSSP) on Rosecrans Ave. (East) arterial street route from Ocean Gate Avenue to Vermont Avenue, which is jurisdictionally shared among the cities of Gardena, Hawthorne, and Lawndale. Due to the scope and cost of the project, the County policy requires a Cooperative Agreement to be executed for the TSSP project. The estimated total cost of the project is $2,943,800.00 with Lawndale's estimated share cost to be $186,500.00, after the grant and county contributions are applied.

The City of Lawndale's $186,500.00 estimated share is the costs of actual construction quantities utilized within City jurisdiction, and it covers engineering, construction administration and 20% contingency.

Staff allocated in FY 2024-2025 $170,000.00 for this project based on a preliminary cost estimate prepared in 2021. A current updated cost estimate show the need $18,600.00 in additional funding to cover the increased cost of construction, administration and contingencies.

To have additional funds available until the construction is fully completed, in case of unforeseen costs, staff is requesting a total budget increase of $30,000.00 for a total budget of $200,000 for the project.The County will be the lead agency for designing, advertising for bids and managing the construction of the project.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is currently $170,000 in the fiscal year budget for this project. A budget amendment of $30,000 is needed from account 272-310-700.309 Measure M Rosecrans Avenue TSSP Project. There is no impact to the General Fund as this project is funded using Measure M funds.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement (Attachment B) between the City of Lawndale and Los Angeles County; and

2. Authorize the appropriation of funds in the amount of $30,000 to the Rosecrans Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project account 272-310-700.309 for a total project budget of $200,000.

Attachments
A. MOU Amendment.pdf
B. TSSP Funding Cooperative Agreement.pdf
C. Rosecrans Avenue TSSP Signed Plans.pdf
D. Location Map.pdf
Attachment A
FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.13.19 FA Local Amendment Lapsing Date
Extension
1 AMENDMENT No. 3 TO FUNDING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND

THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY This Amendment No. 3 to Funding Agreement (this "Amendment"), is dated as of March 15, 2021, by and between County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works ("GRANTEE"), and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA").

RECITALS:

A. GRANTEE and LACMTA entered into that certain Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310, dated November 1, 2013, which was amended on December 1, 2016 and December 1, 2017 (as amended, the "Existing FA"), which Existing FA provides for the South Bay Forum Traffic Signal Corridors Project (the “Project”); and B. WHEREAS, LACMTA adopted Ordinance #16-01, the Los Angeles County Traffic Improvement Plan, on June 23, 2016 (the “Ordinance”), which Ordinance was approved by the voters of Los Angeles County on November 8, 2016 as “Measure M” and became effective on July 1, 2017.

C. WHEREAS, the Measure M funding set forth herein is intended to fund PAED, PS&E and Construction of the Project.

D. WHERAS, the LACMTA Board, at its August 27, 2020 meeting, programmed $1,530,000 Measure M funds to GRANTEE for the Avalon Boulevard TSSP segment of the Project, in the City of Carson; and
E. Whereas, the Funds are currently programmed as follows: $1,530,000 in Measure M funds in Fiscal Years (FY) FY 2020-21; FY 2021-22; and FY 2022-23; and $10,383,451 in Proposition C 25% funds in Fiscal Years (FY) 2013-14, FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21. The total designated programmed amount for the Project is now $11,913,451; and
F. GRANTEE and LACMTA desire to amend the Existing FA as provided herein.

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.13.19 FA Local Amendment Lapsing Date
Extension
2 AGREEMENT:

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“2. Grant Funds:

2.1 Programmed Funds for this Project consists of the following: Proposition C 25% funds and Measure M funds. The Proposition C 25% and the Measure M funds together are referred to as “the Funds”.

2.2. To the extent the Proposition C 25% Funds are available, LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a one-time grant of Proposition C 25% funds in the amount of $10,383,451 (“the Funds”) for the Project. As history, LACMTA Board of Directors’ action of September 24, 2009, granted $10,383,451 to GRANTEE for the Project. Subsequently, the LACMTA Board of Directors with its action on March 25, 2010 deferred the $8,283,451 funding for the project. LACMTA Board of Directors took further action on July 25, 2013 to make available funds of $2,100,000 for the Design of the Project. On July 27, 2017 the LACMTA Board of Directors approved allocating $8,283,451 for Design and Construction. The total Funds grant available for this Project is now $10,383,451. LACMTA Board of Directors recertified $62,000 of Funds for FY 2017-18. Funds are programmed over five years, Fiscal Years (FY) 2013-14, FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, FY 2019-20 and FY 2020-21. LACMTA Board of Directors’ action will be required annually to approve Funds for each subsequent Fiscal Year prior to those Funds being allocated to GRANTEE.

2.3. To the extent the Measure M Funds are available; LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure M funds in the amount of $1,530,000 for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors’ action of August 27, 2020 granted the Measure M Funds for the Project. The Funds are programmed over three (3) years for Fiscal Years (FY) 2020-21, FY 2021-22, and FY 2022-23.”

2. Part II, paragraph 3.5 of the Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: “If the Project requires the implementation of an Intelligent Transportation Systems (“ITS”) project, GRANTEE shall ensure the Project is consistent with the Regional ITS Architecture. Attachment E-1, the Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (CONNECT-IT) Consistency Self-Certification Form, must be completed and signed for planned ITS projects and/or ITS projects that use local, state, or federal funds programmed or administered through LACMTA. Refer to www.laconnect-it.com to find information about the CONNECT-IT Service Packages.” FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.13.19 FA Local Amendment Lapsing Date
Extension
3 3. Part II, Paragraph 8.1(iv) is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“8.1(iv) expending the Proposition C 25% Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs by the stated lapse date. Funds programmed for FY 2013-14, FY 2017-18, FY2018-19, FY2019-20, FY2020-21 are subject to lapse on June 30, 2023.”

4. Part II, Paragraph 8.1(v) is hereby added to the Existing FA as follows:
“8.1(v) expending the Measure M funds granted under this FA for allowable costs within three years or 36 months from July 1 of the Fiscal Year in which the Funds are programmed, unless otherwise stated in this FA. All Funds programmed for FY 2020-21 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2023. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2024. All Funds programmed for FY 2022-23 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2025.”

5. Part II, Paragraph 8.6 is hereby added to Existing FA as follows:
“8.6 In the event that the timely use of the Measure M funds is not demonstrated as described in Part II, Section 8.1 of this FA, the Project will be reevaluated by LACMTA as part of its Annual Update process and the Funds may be reprogrammed to another project by the LACMTA Board of Directors in accordance with the Ordinance, the Guidelines and the Multi-Year Subregional Programs Administrative Procedures. In the event that all the Measure M funds are reprogrammed, this FA shall consider a written amendment.”

6. Part I of the Existing FA is hereby amended by adding Paragraph 13, which reads as follows:
“13. LACMTA anticipates it may need to avail itself of lower cost bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the “Bonds") to provide at least a portion of its funding commitments under this Agreement to GRANTEE. GRANTEE shall ensure that the expenditure of the Funds disbursed to GRANTEE does not jeopardize the tax-exemption of the interest, as specified in the Bond Requirements attached as Attachment G to this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees to provide LACMTA with progress reports, expenditure documentation, and any other documentation as reasonably requested by LACMTA and necessary for LACMTA to fulfill its responsibilities as the grantee or administrator or bond issuer of the Funds. With regard to LACMTA debt financing to provide any portion of the Funds, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable actions as may be requested of it by LACMTA's Project Manager for the Project, to assist LACMTA in demonstrating and maintaining over time, compliance with the relevant sections of the Federal Tax Code to maintain such Bonds’ tax status.”
FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.13.19 FA Local Amendment Lapsing Date
Extension
4 7. Attachment A-1 of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment A-2, attached.

8. Attachment B-1 of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment B-2, attached.

9. Attachment D-1 is hereby added to the Existing FA.

10. Attachment F is hereby added to the Existing FA.

11. Part II, Paragraph 11 of Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“11. COMMUNICATIONS:

11.1 GRANTEE shall ensure that all Communication Materials contain recognition of LACMTA’s contribution to the Project as more particularly set forth in “Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines” available at http://metro.net/partnerscivic. The Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines may be changed from time to time during the course of this Agreement. GRANTEE shall be responsible for complying with the latest Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines during the term of this Agreement, unless otherwise specifically authorized in writing by the LACMTA Chief Communications Officer.

11.2 For purposes of this Agreement, “Communications Materials” include, but are not limited to, press events, public and external newsletters, printed materials, advertising, websites radio and public service announcements, electronic media, and construction site signage. A more detailed definition of “Communications Materials” is found in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines.

11.3 The Metro logo is a trademarked item that shall be reproduced and displayed in accordance with specific graphic guidelines. The preferred logo lock-up for Funding Recipients to use is included in the Funding Recipient Communications Guidelines.

11.4 GRANTEE shall ensure that any subcontractor, including, but not limited to, public relations, public affairs, and/or marketing firms hired to produce Project Communications Materials for public and external purposes will comply with the requirements contained in this Section.

11.5 The LACMTA Project Manager shall be responsible for monitoring GRANTEE’s compliance with the terms and conditions of this Section. GRANTEE’s failure to comply with the terms of this Section shall be deemed a default hereunder and LACMTA shall have all rights and remedies set forth herein.”

12. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Existing FA remains in full FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.13.19 FA Local Amendment Lapsing Date
Extension
5 force and effect as originally executed. All rights and obligations of the parties under the Existing FA that are not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged.

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 1 FA Attachment B-2
ATTACHMENT B-2

SCOPE OF WORK
2009 Call for Projects South Bay Forum Traffic Signal Corridor Project #F3310 See “Exhibit A” for project map.

SOUTH BAY FORUM
2009 CALL FOR PROJECTS

FUNDED BUDGET
Metro Grant Amount $10,383,451
Local Match from L.A. County $2,595,863
Measure M Multi-Year Sub-Regional Program (MSP) Funds $1,530,000 TOTAL BUDGET AVAILABLE $14,509,314

FUNDING DISTRIBUTION
PHASE 1
Tier 1- Traffic Signal Synchronization Design
Avalon Boulevard $772,000
Imperial Highway $402,000
El Segundo Boulevard $464,000
Rosecrans Avenue $390,000
System Wide Coordination Timing $257,000
Program Management $400,000

Subtotal $2,685,000
PHASE 2
Tier 1- Traffic Signal Synchronization Construction
Avalon Boulevard $4,474,000
Imperial Highway $1,706,000
El Segundo Boulevard $2,004,000
Rosecrans Avenue $1,678,000
Operational Improvements $399,314
System Wide Coordination Timing $543,000
Tier 3 and 4- ITS Improvements $1,020,000
Subtotal $11,824,314
TOTAL $14,509,314
FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 2 FA Attachment B-2
PHASE 1

With the Phase 1 funding, the County will complete design of the TSSP projects. This will involve preparing Request for Proposal(s) for consultant led design, conducting detailed field reviews to determine the specific construction elements, and completing the plans, specifications and estimates of the TSSP projects. In addition, this phase of the project will also involve completing the System Wide Coordination Timing and Program Management components of the grant.

Avalon Boulevard TSSP – Design/Project Management

Cost Estimate
Project Name: Avalon Boulevard
Project Limits: 126th Street to Sepulveda Boulevard

Approximate Number of Intersections: 35

Length of Route: 7.7 Miles

Project Engineering

$690,000

Project Management

$82,000

TOTAL

$772,000
Avalon Boulevard Scheduled Project Milestones:

Begin preparation for plans, specifications, and estimate April 2016 Complete preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate March 2021 Imperial Highway TSSP – Design/Project Management

Cost Estimate
Project Name: Imperial Highway
Project Limits: Sundale Avenue to Budlong Avenue

Approximate Number of Intersections: 17

Length of Route: 4 Miles

Project Engineering

$355,000

Project Management

$47,000

TOTAL

$402,000

Imperial Highway Scheduled Project Milestones:

Begin preparation for plans, specifications, and estimate April 2016 Complete preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate July 2021

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 3 FA Attachment B-2
El Segundo Boulevard TSSP – Design/Project Management

Cost Estimate
Project Name: El Segundo Boulevard
Project Limits: Illinois Street to Vermont Avenue

Approximate Number of Intersections: 28

Length of Route: 6.1 Miles

Project Engineering

$410,000

Project Management

$54,000

TOTAL

$464,000

El Segundo Boulevard Scheduled Project Milestones:

Begin preparation for plans, specifications, and estimate April 2016 Complete preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate July 2021 Rosecrans Avenue TSSP – Design/Project Management

Cost Estimate
Project Name: Rosecrans Avenue
Project Limits: Ocean Gate Avenue to Vermont Avenue

Approximate Number of Intersections: 17

Length of Route: 4.3 Miles

Project Engineering

$345,000

Project Management

$45,000

TOTAL

$390,000

Rosecrans Avenue Scheduled Project Milestones:

Begin preparation for plans, specifications, and estimate July 2017 Complete preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate November 2021

System Wide Coordination Timing (Partial Funding)

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: System Wide Coordination Timing
Project Limits: San Gabriel Valley Traffic Forum Region Project Engineering $213,000
Timing Installation $38,000
Project Management $6,000
TOTAL $257,000

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 4 FA Attachment B-2
Program Management

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Management $116,000
Meetings and Presentations $84,000
Tracking Expenditures/Adhering to Project Schedule $144,000 City Coordination Activities $56,000
TOTAL $400,000
Scope of Work:

Meetings and Presentations
This work consists of interfacing and coordinating our overall efforts on a regularly scheduled basis with the affected jurisdictions through the South Bay Council of Governments’ Infrastructure Working Group (IWG). The IWG, which meets monthly, is composed of members from key South Bay cities and works closely with MTA, Caltrans and LA County to help ensure that the regional transportation needs of the South Bay area are addressed. Participants of the IWG, which primarily include public works directors and/or city traffic engineers from South Bay cities, has requested LA County staff to present project status reports. In addition to meeting with affected jurisdictions, this work will include meeting with the project administrators of other projects to interface and coordinate the deployment of computer software and hardware, communications infrastructure, and field devices.

Tracking Expenditures/Adhering to Project Schedule
This work consists of tracking expenditures and reviewing project schedules to ensure all projects adhere to their respective scopes of work and project milestones. The activities include: managing the distribution of Grant funds, preparing spreadsheets which track both actual and projected expenditures, maintaining status reports, and overseeing contracts for consultant services.

City Coordination Activities
The coordination activities include: distributing plans and reports to cities, IWG members, and other interested parties, following up to ensure timely comments on reports, and disseminating information on and enlisting participation of city staff and other interested parties in METRO or County sponsored training courses on ITS. This work also includes LA County staff meeting with individual cities to review the type, amount, and cost of ITS components which are recommended to be deployed within their respective jurisdictions.

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 5 FA Attachment B-2

PHASE 2
With the Phase 2 funding of the Project, the County will construct the traffic signal synchronization improvements for the four arterial routes in the South Bay Cities area. This phase also includes the design and construction of ITS Improvements.

Tier 1 Projects – Traffic Signal Synchronization Construction

There are four TSSP projects in this grant: Avalon Boulevard, Imperial Highway, El Segundo Boulevard, and Rosecrans Avenue. The completion of traffic signal synchronization improvements on these routes will complement other synchronization projects in the area and is part of a long-range plan to synchronize and improve all major corridors in the area.

These synchronization projects are the first step toward building a smarter system of roadways. Future elements will build upon this strategy through the expansion of the County’s multijurisdictional traffic control system to provide centralized control, monitoring, and multi-jurisdictional response capabilities with all routes connected to a Traffic Management Center and local agencies’ workstations for regional operation.

The constriction of these four TSSP projects will improve traffic signal operation along those routes by upgrading each traffic signal, providing additional vehicle detection to enable operation as a fully traffic actuated signal, and installing the appropriate components to enable each signal to be capable of time-based coordination. The traffic signals will be retimed to improve the overall progression of traffic along and crossing the routes. Additionally, these components of the Project will install any warranted and feasible roadway improvements along the routes to improve overall progression which may include: modification of signing and striping; and/or minor roadway widening within existing right-of-way to provide for additional lanes. Lastly, these projects will upgrade equipment necessary to ensure the operational safety of all traffic signals along the routes which may include: upgrade of highway safety lights; cut back of median noses out of crosswalks; upgrade signal standards and mast arms to increase visibility of mast arm-mounted vehicle heads; and, modify signal phasing.

Due to unforeseen complications, field conditions, actual engineering costs, actual consultant contract amounts, construction bids, and a variety of other factors, it may become necessary to make adjustments to the scopes of work and revise the estimated costs as the projects progress. Upon completion of the design phases, detailed summaries of intersection improvements and cost estimates will be submitted to the Metro project manager and any project adjustments will be made with the Metro project manager’s approval.

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 6 FA Attachment B-2
Avalon Boulevard TSSP-Construction

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: Avalon Boulevard
Project Limits: 126th Street to Sepulveda Boulevard

Approximate Number of Intersections: 35

Length of Route: 7.7 Miles

Construction Cost

$3,115,000
Contingency $622,500

Construction Engineering

$622,500

Signal Timing

$114,000

TOTAL

$4,474,000

Avalon Boulevard TSSP Scheduled Project Milestones:

Advertise construction contract September 2021
Award construction contract December 2021
Begin construction March 2022
End construction March 2024

This TSSP project of the project involves synchronizing the traffic signals at the 35 intersections on Avalon Boulevard between 126th Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. The following are the signalized intersections on Avalon Boulevard to be included in this TSSP project.
126th Street
El Segundo Boulevard
132nd Street
135th Street
Rosecrans Avenue
Compton Boulevard
Redondo Beach Boulevard
Alondra Boulevard
Gardena Boulevard
169th Street
Walnut Street
91 FWY W/B On/Off Ramp
Albertoni Street
Harbor Village Driveway
Victoria Street
184th Street/Home Depot Center
189th Street/University Drive
192nd Street
Elsmere Drive
Turmont Street
Del Amo Boulevard
Carson Plaza Drive
Carson Mall Driveway
Dominguez Street
405 FWY N/B On/Off Ramp
405 FWY S/B On/Off Ramp
213th Street
Carson Street
220th Street
223rd Street
Watson Center Road
228th Street
Bayport Street
Scottsdale Drive
Sepulveda Boulevard

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 7 FA Attachment B-2
Imperial Highway TSSP- Construction

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: Imperial Highway
Limits: Sundale Avenue to Budlong Avenue

Approximate Number of Intersections: 17

Length of Route: 4 Miles

Construction Cost

$1,181,000

Contingency

$235,000

Construction Engineering

$235,000

Signal Timing

$55,000
TOTAL

$1,706,000

Imperial Highway TSSP Scheduled Project Milestones:

Advertise construction contract October 2021
Award construction contract January 2022
Begin construction March 2022
End construction June 2023
This TSSP project involves synchronizing the traffic signals at the 17 intersections on Imperial Highway between Sundale Avenue and Budlong Avenue. The following are the signalized intersections on Imperial Highway to be included in this TSSP project.

Sundale Avenue
Inglewood Avenue
Firman Avenue/Ramona Avenue
Hawthorne Boulevard
Freeman Avenue
Prairie Avenue
Doty Avenue
Yukon Avenue
Simms Avenue
Crenshaw Boulevard
Ardath Avenue
Van Ness Avenue
Wilton Place
Western Avenue
Denker Avenue
Normandie Avenue
Budlong Avenue
FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 8 FA Attachment B-2
El Segundo Boulevard TSSP-Construction

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE

Project Name: El Segundo Boulevard
Project Limits: Illinois Street to Budlong Avenue

Approximate Number of Intersections: 28

Length of Route: 6.1 Miles

Construction Cost

$1,368,000

Contingency

$273,000

Construction Engineering

$273,000

Signal Timing

$90,000

TOTAL $2,004,000

El Segundo TSSP Scheduled Project Milestones:

Advertise construction contract October 2021
Award construction contract January 2022
Begin construction March 2022
End construction June 2023
This TSSP project involves synchronizing the traffic signals at the 28 intersections on El Segundo Boulevard between Illinois Street and Budlong Avenue. The following are the signalized intersections on El Segundo Boulevard to be included in this TSSP project.

Illinois Street
Sepulveda Boulevard
Continental Boulevard
Nash Street
Douglas Street
Aviation Boulevard
Isis Avenue
405 FWY S/B On/Off Ramp
La Cienega Boulevard
405 FRY N/B On/Off Ramp
Ocean Gate Avenue
Shoup Avenue
Inglewood Avenue
Ramona Avenue
Hawthorne Boulevard
Cedar Av. /Washington Bl. /Birch Av.

Prairie Avenue
Doty Avenue
Kornblum Avenue
Yukon Avenue
Chadron Avenue
Crenshaw Boulevard
Wilkie Avenue
Van Ness Avenue
Western Avenue
Normandie Avenue
Budlong Avenue
Vermont Avenue
FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 9 FA Attachment B-2
Rosecrans Avenue TSSP-Construction

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: Rosecrans Avenue
Project Limits: Ocean Gate Avenue to Vermont Avenue
Approximate Number of Intersections: 17

Length of Route: 4.3 Miles

Construction Cost

$1,148,000

Contingency

$230,000

Construction Engineering

$230,000

Signal Timing

$70,000

TOTAL

$1,678,000
Rosecrans Avenue TSSP Scheduled Project Milestones:

Advertise construction contract February 2022
Award construction contract May 2022
Begin construction July 2022
End construction June 2023
This TSSP project involves synchronizing the traffic signals at the 17 intersections on Rosecrans Avenue between Ocean Gate Avenue and Vermont Avenue. The following are the signalized intersections on Rosecrans Avenue to be included in this TSSP project.

Ocean Gate Avenue
Inglewood Avenue
Firmona Avenue/Ramona Avenue
Hawthorne Boulevard
Jefferson Avenue
Prairie Avenue
Doty Avenue
Yukon Avenue
Cerise Avenue
Lemoli Avenue
Crenshaw Boulevard
Van Ness Avenue
Gramercy Place
Western Avenue
Normandie Avenue
Budlong Avenue
Vermont Avenue

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 10 FA Attachment B-2
Operational Improvements

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: Operational Improvements
Project Limits: Locations to be determined.

Design/Project Engineering $225,600
Construction $68,514
Contingencies $44,800
Construction Engineering $44,800
Project Management $15,600
TOTAL $399,314
This element of the scope of work will construct appropriate operational improvements that may be recommended during the preliminary engineering and design of the four aforementioned arterial routes in the South Bay Forum. This project will implement warranted and feasible operational or intersection improvements to increase the overall capacity, efficiency, and safety of these routes and their intersections. Typical improvements include: left turn phasing; restriping to provide for additional lanes; minor widening within existing right of way; signing and striping modifications; traffic channelization improvements; and, new traffic signals.

These operational improvements are in addition to the improvements recommended in the scope of work for each arterial route. Additional operational improvements may be identified during pre-design interviews with the affected cities or during field reviews which occur during plan preparation. These operational improvements will only be implemented if they improve the operation and/or safety of the routes.

System Wide Coordination Timing

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: System Wide Coordination Timing
Project Limits: South Bay Traffic Forum Region
Project Engineering $407,000
Timing Installation $120,000
Project Management $16,000
TOTAL $543,000
This project will augment the scope and magnitude of the system wide coordination timing to be implemented on various arterial routes in the South Bay Forum. The implementation of the traffic signal synchronization improvements identified in this Scope of Work will alter the traffic signal timing of intersecting arterial streets currently operating under coordinated timing. Therefore, revisions to the timing of the crossing arterials will be necessary. If not FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 11 FA Attachment B-2
revised, these existing synchronized routes will experience deterioration in the effectiveness of their current signal timing plans, since the timing was designed on the basis of a single arterial and did not account for crossing arterials. The existing routes will need to be retimed employing timing methods based on a network of synchronized routes.

The project will determine the optimal cycle lengths, phase splits, and offsets for the a.m. peak, p.m. peak, and off-peak periods for all of these routes, which may require the use of a modeling software package such as Synchro to be accepted by some of the affected agencies.

This funding will be used to complete the optimizing model, prepare time-space diagrams, prepare timing sheets, install timing in the field controllers, and adjust timing in the field as necessary.

Tier 3 and 4- Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Improvements

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK AND COST ESTIMATE
Project Name: Intelligent Transportation System Improvements Project Limits: Location(s) to be determined.

Project Engineering $225,000
Construction $765,000
Project Management $30,000
TOTAL $1,020,000
ITS Improvements Milestones:

Begin preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate Complete preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates Advertise construction contract
Award construction contract
Begin construction
October 2019
September 2021
January 2022
April 2022
July 2022
End construction June 2023
Scope of Work:

This element of the scope of work will implement Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) improvements to increase the capacity of the major arterials without adding lanes and enable the current transportation system in the South Bay Forum to operate at its maximum efficiency. Using advanced technologies for communications and information processing, the project will expand the improvements installed with prior grants and deploy an Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) which is expected to improve the overall regional traffic mobility and reduce traffic delays on arterial corridors. This project is a significant step towards building a smarter system of roadways.

This project’s scope of work includes expansion of the ATMS for the County and City maintained intersections along the project routes. The ATMS expansion will provide the FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310
FA.P00F3310
Rev: 08.07.12 12 FA Attachment B-2
traffic signal controller upgrades, traffic signal timing revisions, and communications infrastructure necessary to monitor and control the operation and timing of traffic signals; collect and manage real-time traffic information; exchange data and information with other jurisdictions; and monitor signal equipment status. The ATMS will also include the installation of closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras to detect incidents and monitor traffic conditions, and a communications system to provide field-to-center and center-to-center connections. Once installed, these CCTV locations are proposed to be connected to the County’s Video Distribution System which will enable the exchange of camera images in real time across jurisdictional boundaries. In addition, the ATMS will include the deployment of travel time measurement devices to capture travel time and traffic counts for performance measurements. Appropriate security measures and levels of authority will be incorporated into these ITS elements to prevent any undesired access to data or control of field devices.

Another primary component of this project is the expansion of the County's Information Exchange Network (IEN) into the South Bay Forum. The IEN will provide an interjurisdictional data-sharing component to allow the implementation of arterial traffic management strategies such as cooperative efforts in timing plan development and coordinated response to arterial incidents, congestion and special events. These strategies will result in a substantial enhancement of traffic signal coordination and event management capabilities for the affected cities. The IEN also includes monitoring and control access permissions/restrictions among the agencies to prevent unauthorized access.

This project complements other ITS projects in the area and is part of a long-range plan to improve all major corridors in Los Angeles County. These ITS elements are part of the overall strategy to provide centralized control and monitoring and multi-jurisdictional response capabilities by tying all routes to a TMC for regional operation. These ITS elements will enable jurisdictions to respond more efficiently and effectively to traffic congestion caused by incidents, special events, and malfunctioning traffic signal equipment.

Due to unforeseen complications, field conditions, actual engineering costs, actual consultant contract amounts, construction bids, and a variety of other factors, it may become necessary to make adjustments to the scope of work and revise the estimated costs as the project progresses. Upon completion of the design phase, detailed summaries of the improvements and cost estimates will be submitted to the Metro project manager and any project adjustments will be made with the Metro project manager’s approval.

Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority
2021 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000)
TIP ID LA9918952 Implementing Agency Los Angeles County SCAG RTP Project #:

Conformity Category: TCM
Project Description: This project involves synchronizing the traffic signals at the 35 intersections on Avalon Boulevard between 126th Street and Sepulveda Boulevard. The attached map is missing the two I-405 freeway ramps, Carson Street, and Watson Center Rd/228th.

Study:N/A Is Model: YES Model #:

PM: Ricardo Gordillo, PE - (626)458-3994
LS: N LS GROUP#:

EA #: PPNO:

Program Code: ITS02 - SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Stop Loc:

Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT - 12/31/2013 Uza: Los Angeles-Long
Beach-Santa Ana
Sub-Area: Sub-Region:

CTIPS ID:

Lane # Extd: N/ALane # Prop: N/AImprv Desc: Traffic signals synchronization - 35 intersections Toll Rate: Hov acs eg loc:

0.00 Toll Colc Loc: Toll Method:

System :Local Hwy Route : Postmile: Distance: Phase: Engineering/Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Completion Date 03/31/2024 PHASE PRIOR 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 BEYOND PROG TOTAL MEASURE M MYSP (Multi Year Subregional Program) PE $60 $0 $0 $60 CON
RW
SUBTOTAL $130 $700 $700 $1,530
$70 $700 $700 $1,470
$0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $130 $700 $700
TOTAL PE: $60 TOTAL RW: $0 TOTAL CON: $1,470
$1,530
TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $1,530
- General Comment: Measure M funds are being added to the grant of F3310. - Modeling Comment: Measure M funds are being added to the grant of F3310. - TCM Comment: Measure M funds are being added to the grant of F3310. - Amendment Comment: Measure M funds are being added to the grant of F3310. - CMP Comment:
- Narrative:

Last Revised Amendment 21-97 - Accepted Change reason:NEW PROJECT Total Project Cost $1,530

Page 1 ends

FTIP#: LAF3310 CFP# F3310/MM# MM5507.07
AMENDMENT NO.3
Funding Agreement No. FA.P00F3310

03.01.19 Measure M FA - MSP
Attachment F Bond Requirements
1 ATTACHMENT F

BOND REQUIREMENTS
The provisions of this Attachment F apply only if and to the extent some or all of the Funds are derived from LACMTA issued Bonds or other debt, the interest on which is tax exempt for federal tax purposes (collectively, the "Bonds").

GRANTEE acknowledges that some or all of the Funds may be derived from Bonds, the interest on which is tax-exempt for federal tax purposes. GRANTEE further acknowledges its understanding that the proceeds of the Bonds are subject to certain ongoing limitations relating to the use of the assets financed or provided with such proceeds ("Project Costs" or "Project Components") in the trade or business of any person or entity other than a governmental organization (any such use by a person or entity other than a governmental organization is referred to as "Private Use"). Private Use will include any sale, lease or other arrangement pursuant to which a nongovernmental person or entity receives a legal entitlement of a Project Component and also includes certain agreements pursuant to which a nongovernmental person will operate or manage a Project Component. Each quarterly invoice submitted by GRANTEE to reimburse prior expenditures (or to be received as an advance) shall provide information regarding the specific Project Costs or Project Components to which the Funds which pay that invoice will be allocated and whether there is or might be any Private Use associated with such Project Costs or Project Components.

GRANTEE will, for the entire time over which LACMTA's Bonds or other debt remains outstanding, (1) notify and receive LACMTA' s approval prior to entering into any arrangement which will or might result in Private Use and (2) maintain records, including obtaining records from contractors and subcontractors as necessary, of all allocations of Funds to Project Costs or Project Components and any Private Use of such Project Costs or Project Components in sufficient detail to comply and establish compliance with Section 141 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or similar code provision then in effect and applicable, as determined by LACMTA in consultation with its bond counsel.

GRANTEE will designate one or more persons that will be responsible for compliance with the obligations described in this Attachment F and notify LACMTA of such designations.

Attachment B

Page 1 of 11 ends

A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LAWNDALE a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as COUNTY):

W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, to assist in the traffic flow, CITY and COUNTY desire to modify and synchronize the traffic signals along Rosecrans Avenue (East) TSSP from Ocean Gate Avenue to Vermont Avenue, a portion of which is within CITY, and which work is hereinafter referred to as PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvements are jurisdictionally shared between CITY, the City of Hawthorne, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Gardena and COUNTY, and a separate agreement between the City of Gardena and COUNTY is being executed covering the portions of PROJECT within the City of Lawndale’s jurisdictions; and
WHERES, PROJECT is within the shared geographical boundaries of CITY, the City of Hawthorne, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Gardena and COUNTY; and
WHEREAS, PROJECT is of general interest to CITY, the City of Hawthorne, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Gardena and COUNTY; and WHEREAS, for the purpose of providing funding for PROJECT, COUNTY, as lead agency, on March 15, 2021, entered into an amended Memorandum of Understanding No. P00F3310 (MOU) with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro); and
WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to utilize and share with CITY the funding provided for in COUNTY/Metro MOU P00F3310 to finance a portion of COST OF PROJECT; and

WHEREAS, COST OF PROJECT includes the COST OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and COST OF CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION; and
WHEREAS, the total COST OF PROJECT is currently estimated to be Two Million Nine Hundred Forty-Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($2,949,700.00); and

WHEREAS, under the MOU, Metro will provide to COUNTY a grant (GRANT) of up to a maximum of One Million Six Hundred Fifty-Four Thousand Four Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,654,400.00) for PROJECT; and

Page 2 of 11 ends

WHEREAS, allocation of the METRO grant is currently estimated to be, Five Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($594,600.00) toward CITY’s jurisdictional share, Six Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($6,100.00) toward COUNTY’s jurisdictional share, One Million One Thousand One Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,001,100.00) toward the City of Gardena’s jurisdictional share, and Fifty-Two Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($52,600.00) towards the City of Hawthorne’s jurisdictional share.

WHEREAS, CITY is willing to finance its jurisdictional share of COST OF PROJECT currently estimated to be, One Million Twenty Thousand Nine Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($1,020,900.00) by claiming its share of COUNTY/METRO grant funds, currently estimated to be Five Hundred Ninety-Four Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($594,600.00) and contributing other CITY funds in the amount of One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00/100 Dollars ($186,500.00) to finance a portion of the COST OF PROJECT; and WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to contribute funds in the amount of Two Hundred Thirty-Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($239,800.00) to finance a portion of CITY’S COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, CITY agrees to contribute funds of One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($186,500.00) to finance a portion of the COST OF PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, CITY'S estimated share is the sum of the costs of actual quantities of construction contract items utilized within CITY jurisdiction less the grant amount for grant eligible items plus thirty (30) percent of that for PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING cost, twenty (20) percent of that for CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION cost, twenty (20) percent of that for contingencies, and three and a half (3.5) percent of combined costs of PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING and CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION towards contract city liability trust fund altogether estimated to be One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($186,500.00); and WHEREAS, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters for the general operation of a traffic signal, which typically include, but is not limited to, defining the phases, attributes and timing values for each permitted phase, pedestrian movement, and assigning detection; and WHEREAS, COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING involves the timing parameters that allow multiple traffic signals to be synchronized with each other, which typically include defining coordination cycle lengths, offsets and time of day operations for each traffic signal coordination plan; and

WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, solicitation of construction bids and award of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, and CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION for PROJECT; and

Page 3 of 11 ends

WHEREAS, COUNTY agrees to be responsible to perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, such a proposal is authorized and provided for by the provisions of Sections 6500 and 23004, et seq., of the Government Code and Sections 1685 and 1803 of the California Streets and Highways Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the promises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows:
(1) DEFINITIONS:

a. The term JURISDICTION, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall be defined as the area within the jurisdictional boundary of each governmental entity party to this AGREEMENT.
b. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of environmental findings and approvals/permits; design survey; soils report; traffic index and geotechnical investigation; preparation of plans, specifications, and cost estimates; right-of-way engineering; utility engineering; and all other necessary work prior to advertising of PROJECT for construction bids.
c. COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the actual payments to the construction contractor(s) for PROJECT and the total of all payments to utility companies or contractor(s) for the relocation of facilities necessary for the construction of PROJECT, and the cost of any additional unforeseen work that is necessary for the construction of PROJECT. d. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION as referred to in this
AGREEMENT shall consist of construction contract administration, construction inspection, materials testing, construction survey, traffic detour, signing and striping, construction engineering, utility relocation and coordination matters, changes and modifications of plans and specifications for PROJECT necessitated by unforeseen or unforeseeable field conditions encountered during construction of PROJECT, construction contingencies, and all other necessary work after advertising of PROJECT for construction bids to cause PROJECT to be constructed in accordance with said plans and specifications approved by CITY and COUNTY.
e. COST OF PROJECT, as referred to in this AGREEMENT, shall consist of the COST OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT and costs of

Page 4 of 11 ends

PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, and
COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for traffic signals within PROJECT limits, right-of-way acquisition and clearance matters, and all other work and materials necessary to construct PROJECT in accordance with the approved plans and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages, and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration, and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items.
f. Completion of PROJECT as referred to in this AGREEMENT shall be defined as the date of field acceptance of construction of PROJECT by COUNTY and an electronic notification to CITY'S City Manager that the improvements within CITY'S JURISDICTION are completed and transferred to CITY for purpose of operation and maintenance. (2) CITY AGREES:
a. To finance CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT, the actual amount of which is to be determined by a final accounting, pursuant to paragraph (4) d., below.
b. To deposit with COUNTY, following execution of this AGREEMENT and upon demand by COUNTY, CITY funds in the amount of One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00/100 ($186,500.00) hereinafter referred as CITY’S PAYMENT. Said demand will consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY. c. To obtain and grant to COUNTY any necessary temporary right of way within CITY for the construction of PROJECT at no cost to COUNTY. d. To issue to COUNTY a no-fee permit(s) authorizing COUNTY to construct those portions of PROJECT with CITY highway right of way on condition that the COUNTY'S contractor meets the insurance requirements as required and approved by the CITY’s Risk Manager. e. To cooperate with COUNTY in conducting negotiations with and, where appropriate, issue notices to public utilities and owners of substructure and overhead facilities regarding the relocation, removal, operation, and maintenance of all surface and underground utilities and facilities, structures, and transportation services, which interfere with the proposed construction. Where utilities have been installed in CITY streets or on CITY property, CITY will provide the necessary right of way for the relocation of those utilities and facilities that interfere with the construction of PROJECT. CITY will take all necessary steps to assist COUNTY in utilizing the City's prior rights over utility companies and owners of substructure and overhead facilities and execute any necessary documentation to temporarily grant, transfer or assign such

Page 5 of 11 ends

prior rights to the COUNTY when necessary for the COUNTY to construct and complete the PROJECT. All such prior rights shall revert to the CITY upon completion of the PROJECT.
f. To authorize COUNTY to represent CITY pursuant to this AGREEMENT, in negotiations pertaining to the advertisement of PROJECT for construction bids, award, and administration of the construction contract and in all things necessary and proper to complete PROJECT.
g. Upon completion of PROJECT: (1) to accept full and complete ownership of, and responsibility for, the PROJECT; and (2) to maintain in good condition and at CITY expense all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT within CITY'S JURISDICTION, including the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and the COORDINATION TRAFFIC
SIGNAL TIMING to support synchronization of traffic signals on Rosecrans Avenue (East).
(3) COUNTY AGREES:
a. To perform or cause to be performed the preliminary engineering, contract administration, construction inspection and engineering, utility engineering and relocation, traffic detour, BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING, TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION TIMING, and final signing and striping for PROJECT.
b. To act as lead agency, prepare the necessary environmental documents, and make the required environmental findings for PROJECT pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. c. To contribute toward CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT, currently estimated to be Two Hundred Thirty-Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($239,800.00).
d. To submit an invoice to CITY in the amount of One Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($186,500.00) upon adoption of this AGREEMENT by COUNTY.
e. To obtain CITY'S approval of plans for PROJECT prior to advertising for construction bids.
f. To advertise PROJECT for construction bids, to award and to administer the construction contract, and to act on behalf of CITY in all negotiations pertaining thereto.
g. To administer the design and construction of PROJECT in accordance with all regulations and requirements of Metro relating to the expenditure of Proposition C Local Return funds and Proposition C Twenty-five

Page 6 of 11 ends

Percent (25%) Discretionary funds and Memorandum of Understanding No. P00F3310 between COUNTY and Metro. COUNTY'S records for PROJECT shall be open to inspection and subject to audit and reproduction by COUNTY and Metro, or any of their duly authorized representatives, and shall be retained by COUNTY for a period of not less than seven (7) years after final payment to contractor(s) for PROJECT.
h. To ensure that CITY and all officers and employees of CITY are named as additional insured parties under the construction contractor's(s') Contractor's General Liability and automobile insurance policies. i. To furnish to CITY, within one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after final Board acceptance of PROJECT, a final accounting of the actual CITY’S share of COST OF PROJECT including an itemization of actual unit costs and actual contract quantities, as specified in paragraph (3) a., above.
j. To perform or cause to be performed the equipment and system testing and to develop and implement the BASIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING and COORDINATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING for the PROJECT. k. To return any unexpended CITY funds if COUNTY fails to complete all or a portion of PROJECT within CITY’S JURISDICTION.
(4) IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
a. Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to alter TSSP Agreement. b. The financial obligations of COUNTY pursuant to this AGREEMENT are conditional upon COUNTY obtaining reimbursement from Metro pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding No. P00F3310 between COUNTY and Metro. If COUNTY and/or Metro fails to provide its financial contribution, then COUNTY shall refund CITY'S payment within ninety (90) calendar days after notice from Metro to COUNTY that Metro funds are not available.
c. The final accounting of the actual total COST OF PROJECT shall allocate said total cost between CITY and COUNTY based on the previously agreed upon improvements and/or work completed. Thus, the cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work), previously agreed upon as CITY’S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by CITY. The cost of all work or improvements (including all engineering, administration, and all other costs incidental to PROJECT work), previously agreed upon as COUNTY’S share of the COST OF PROJECT, shall be borne by COUNTY.

Page 7 of 11 ends

d. That if at final accounting CITY'S share of COST OF PROJECT exceeds CITY'S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph (2) a., above, CITY shall pay to COUNTY the additional amount upon demand. Said demand shall consist of a billing invoice prepared by COUNTY. Conversely, if the CITY'S share is less than CITY'S PAYMENT, COUNTY shall refund the difference to CITY without further action by CITY.
e. That if CITY'S PAYMENT, as set forth in paragraph (2) a., above is not delivered to COUNTY office, which is described on the billing invoice prepared by COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice, notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code Section 907, COUNTY may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest thereon, from any funds of CITY on deposit with COUNTY after giving notice to CITY of COUNTY'S intention to do so.
f. CITY shall review the final accounting invoice prepared by COUNTY and report in writing any discrepancies to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. Undisputed charges shall be paid by CITY to COUNTY within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of said invoice. COUNTY shall review all disputed charges and submit a written justification detailing the basis for those charges within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of CITY'S written report. CITY shall then make payment of the previously disputed charges or submit justification for nonpayment within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of COUNTY'S written justification.
g. COUNTY at any time may, at its sole discretion, designate an alternative payment mailing address and an alternative schedule for payment of CITY funds if applicable. CITY shall be notified of such changes by invoice prepared by COUNTY and delivered to CITY.
h. During construction of PROJECT, COUNTY shall furnish an inspector or other representative to perform the functions of an inspector. CITY may also furnish, at no cost to COUNTY, an inspector or other representative to inspect construction of the PROJECT. CITY shall have no obligation to inspect the PROJECT and no liability shall be attributable as a result of CITY'S inspection or failure to inspect. Said inspectors shall cooperate and consult with each other, but the orders of COUNTY inspector to the contractor or any other person in charge of construction shall prevail and be final, and COUNTY inspector shall be responsible for the proper inspection of PROJECT as needed. i. This AGREEMENT may be amended or modified only by mutual written consent of COUNTY and CITY. Amendments and modifications of a nonmaterial nature may be made by the mutual written consent of the parties.

Page 8 of 11 ends

j. Any correspondence, communication, or contact concerning this AGREEMENT shall be directed to the following:

CITY: Mr. Sean Moore
City Manager
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260

COUNTY: Mr. Mark Pestrella
Director of Public Works
Los Angeles County Public Works
P.O. Box 1460
Alhambra, CA 91802-1460
k. COUNTY and CITY acknowledge and recognize that the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT provide significant regional and local benefits with respect to reducing traffic congestion. COUNTY and CITY further acknowledge and recognize that the cost of defending claims and lawsuit arising from the improvements contemplated by this AGREEMENT is paid for by public monies and both parties share an interest in reducing the amount of public monies spent on defending claims and lawsuits where possible without prejudicing their respective defenses.
l. In the event that a claim lawsuit is brought against COUNTY and CITY based on the allegation that the design, construction, maintenance, or operation of the improvements constructed under this AGREEMENT proximately caused injuries or damage, COUNTY and CITY agree to cooperate as much as possible with respect to defending the claim or lawsuit without causing prejudice to their respective defenses to the claim or lawsuit. Upon receipt of the claim or lawsuit, the COUNTY and CITY, through their respective agents if appropriate, shall promptly investigate the matter. COUNTY and CITY shall then meet and confer promptly regarding whether a joint defense is appropriate or if one party should tender its defense and indemnification to the other party. m. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to, assumed by, or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of CITY

Page 9 of 11 ends

under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of CITY under this AGREEMENT. Where liability for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) is sought to be imposed under Section 830, et seq., of the Government Code for a dangerous condition of property owned by or under the control of CITY, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify, and hold COUNTY harmless from any and all liability arising from such dangerous condition.
n. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend, and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to or determined to be the responsibility of COUNTY under this AGREEMENT.
o. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of Assumption of Liability Agreement No. 32065 between CITY and COUNTY, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on December 27, 1977, and currently in effect, are inapplicable to this AGREEMENT.
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//

Page 10 of 11 ends

//
//

Page 11 of 11 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF LAWNDALE on , 2024, and by the COUNTY
OF LOS ANGELES on , 2024.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By________________________
Director of Public Works
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
Acting County Counsel
By______________________
Deputy

CITY OF LAWNDALE
By________________________
City Manager

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By __________________________ By________________________ City Clerk City Attorney
P:\tpppub\RP\Prop C\PROJECTS\Rosecrans Av (East)-Ocean Gate Av-Vermont Av (TSM0010255)\ADV\Companion BL Contract B\TSSP Funding Co-op Agreement_Lawndale.docx
Attachment C
12/29/2023
01/02/2024

ROSECRANS AVENUE

RAMONA AVENUE
1 2
7 5
5 5
5 5
5 7
9 9
3 4
7 8
9 10
11 1
12 5
6 2

KINGSDALE
AVENUE
8 13
12 R3-2
12 R9-3 R9-3bP (R) 15
11 R3-2 12
12 R9-3 R9-3bP(R)
5 16
16 3
3 10

FIRMONA
AVENUE
(3I5U)
Ø3
(4I6U)
Ø3
Ø3P
Ø3P
Ø2
Ø2
Ø2
Ø2P
Ø2P
Ø4 Ø4
Ø6
Ø6
Ø6P
Ø6P
Ø4P
Ø4P
Ø6
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
40'
12' 11' 12' 10' 12' 11' 12'
40'
50' 50'
12' 11' 12' 10' 12' 11' 12' (6J2U) (6J2L)
R/W
R/W
50'
15' 15'15' 15'
40'
11' FROM

EDGE OF DWY
2' FROM 2' FROM

EDGE OF DWY
Ø4
R/W
R/W
EX. R13A(CA)
#5 #5
#5
EX. RED CURB
13'
13'
13'
BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
BCR
ECR
BCR
ECR
#5
#6
#5 #5
EX. R13A(CA)
EX. R9-3
R9-3a
R9-3bP
R10-11(MOD)
EX. TYPE III SERVICE
8' 12' 12' 8'
EX. R13A(CA) EX. R13A(CA)
R/W
R/W

7.0'

27.5'

BUS PAD
EX. R13A(CA)
EX. R9-3
R9-3a
R9-3bP
R13A(CA)
EX. WIRELESS RADIO X
D
10' 10'
10' 10'
EX. R30(CA)
EX. CITY CUSTOM
EX. BUS SIGN
10' 10'
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. R1-1
SNS(2)
EX. RED CURB
EX. R3-2
(HIGH MOUNT)
#5
#5
#5 #5 #6
EX. RED CURB
EX. R14-1
EX. RED CURB
EX. R3-5(RT)
EX. R3-5(RT)
EX. RED CURB
EX. CITY CUSTOM
EX. R3-2 (MOD)
EX. "RIGHT TURN ONLY"
Ø2
Ø6
4 5'
5'
4 17
14 10'
4 18
2 LOOPS
3' 2 LOOPS
45'
14 40'
6 40'
6 10
10 F=12'
F=12'
19 19
16 20 R13A(CA)
(2I2L)
15'
10 #5
R/W
R/W
ALLEY
3 LOO
P
S
10 R/
W
EX. RED CURB
R/
W
#5
3 LOO
P
S
(2I2U)
3'
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019
REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF T.S. SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JPTRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANKRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\TS_Plans\2-Rosecrans and FIRMONA-RAMONA.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:04pm jopark

DATEDATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:BY:APPROVED

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID USA
N E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF HAWTHORNECITY OF LAWNDALE
T.G. 733 - C4

15.6% CITY OF HAWTHORNE

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT FIRMONA AVENUE / RAMONA AVENUE
2602
SP-1-T(N)
----
30'(N)

PPB POST
19-4-100(N)
1A(10')
15 TYPE LEGEND

STREET NAME SIGN
M.A. H.P.S.* LENGTH
6 -
6 1
-
1 ----
12'
NO. PED WATTS M.A. POLE

SIGNAL MOUNTING

POLE SCHEDULE
M.A.

SIGNAL
TYPE
POLE
6 LENGTH

LUMINAIRE
14 PHASE
PED. PUSH
----
----
----
YEAR
ALL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

SPEC
I.I. - INDICATES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN. 3 15* ---- 8' 1 4 Rosecrans Ave2 15 ---- 8' 1 4
----
I.I.
5 BUTTON
----
2022
----
--------
12'(N)
-------- - -
----
30'(N) Firmona Av
----
----
SV-1-T(N)
----
----
---- TV-2-T---- SP-1-T
SP-1-T
SV-1-TA
2-MAS(N)
----
SV-1-TA SP-1-T
A
B
C
D
E

POLE LOCATION
----

3.5'
----

3.5'
----------------
3'
----

SEE PLAN
----
--------
3'
----

2.5'2.5'2.5'2.5'
3'

2.5'
----
--------
--------
--------
789
101112
19-4-100(N)
15151515
1A(7')
----------------
2022
----
------------------------ ----
----------------
SV-1-T(N)
-------- TP-1-T---- SP-1-T
SV-1-TA
SV-2-TA ----
SP-1-T
----
SP-1-T(N) 12'(N)
12'
8'8'8'
----
----
200(N)
--
1111
2233
--
----
----
----
----
----
----
Ramona Av
Ramona Av
Rosecrans Av
---- ---- ---- 3' 2.5'
4' ---- ---- ---- 2.5'
---- ---- 3' ---- 2.5'
0' ---- ---- ---- 2.5'

2.5'
SEE PLAN 2.5'SEE PLAN

SEE PLAN
*INSTALL ALL HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTS WITH LED EQUIVALENT. HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTS TO BE LED LIGHTING MANUFACTURED I.I.(N)I.I.(N)I.I.(N)
I.I.

BY ACUITY LIGHTING (2700K) OR EQUIVALENT MODELS APPROVED BY AGENCY. **

EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
OPERATION: Ø2 AND Ø6 ON VEHICLE RECALL
Ø3 AND Ø4 ON NON-LOCK
DUMMY
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"E" SHALL BE 2'-6"
NOTE:

TOP OF CURB

NO SCALE
D
E
E
B A
C
BCR
ECR

POLE LOCATION DETAIL

1. REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2021 EDITION, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THE REFERENCED STANDARD PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. THE GPS UNIVERSAL TIME BASE UNIT/MODULE ANTENNA SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE TOP OF THE CONTROLLER CABINET.

3. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MARKED (TAGGED) WITHIN THE CONTROLLER CABINET FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION.

4. ALL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM.

5. (XXXX) INDICATES LOOP AND/OR VIDEO/RADAR DETECTION ZONE ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONTROLLER CABINET. EACH LOOP ASSIGNMENT SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE TO THE CONTROLLER.

6. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE ROUND (6' DIAMETER), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE CENTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LANE AND FRONT LOOPS SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND THE LIMIT LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

8. INDICATES PROPOSED RADAR DETECTION ZONE.9. INDICATES PROPOSED VIDEO/RADAR UNIT OR VIDEO DETECTION CAMERA.

10. INDICATES BICYCLE LOOP DETECTOR.

11. DETECTORS AND/OR VIDEO/RADAR DETECTION ZONES SHALL BE CONFIGURED PER DETECTOR ASSIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

12. REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF WIRELESS RADIO EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA WILL BE DONE BY THE AGENCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE SIGNAL SHOP AT (626) 458-1700 TEN (10) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE FOR COORDINATION.

13. POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. PRECISE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD AND VERIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.

14. ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO FURTHER THAN 5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF CROSSWALK OR LIMIT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

15. ALL SIGNING SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

16. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AT (310) 783-9315 FOR THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING STREET LIGHT.

17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE TO BE PRESENT DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE RADAR DETECTION SYSTEM ANDRADAR UNIT(S).

18. CONTACT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT (626) 300-2012 UPON START OF

SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND IMPLEMENTATION.

GENERAL NOTES:
----
----
200(N)200(N)150(N)200(N)200(N)200(N)200(N)150(N)
2-MAS(N)

84.4% CITY OF LAWNDALE
3 17 OF
FOR UTILITIES SEE SHEET 3 OF 11
(N) INDICATES NEW EQUIPMENT.ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES AND MAST ARMS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION.ALL SIGNAL MOUNTINGS SHALL BE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2021 EDITION.* * HIGH MOUNT.

BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
01/03/2024
R/W

ROSECRANS AVENUE
40' 40'
50' 50'
40'
8' 12' 12' 8'
50'
15' 15'
10' 10'
8 2
0 BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
BCR
ECR
BCR
ECR
40' 40'
50' 50'
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019

REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF TS SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\Utilities\2_ROSECRANS-FIRMONA-RAMONA-Utility.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:05pm jopark

DATEDATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:BY:APPROVED

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID SUSAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF HAWTHORNECITY OF LAWNDALE

UTILITY PLAN

UTILITIES SUBSTRUCTURE LEGEND

84.4% CITY OF LAWNDALE

15.6% CITY OF HAWTHORNE
OF 17 2602 T.S.

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT FIRMONA AVENUE / RAMONA AVENUE
T.G. 733 - C4
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
01/03/2024

CITY OF HAWTHORNE
4 3
ECR
BCR
1 2
BCR
ECR

JEFFERSON AVE
1 5
4 4
2 7
9 10
8 11
11 6
3 3
R/W
(6J2U)
(4I6U)
5 6

ROSECRANS AVENUE
Ø4P
Ø4P
Ø4P Ø4P
Ø4 Ø4
Ø6
Ø2P
Ø2P
Ø6
Ø6 Ø2
Ø2
Ø2
12' 11' 12' 10' 12' 11' 12'
12' 11' 12' 10' 12' 11' 12'
40' 40'
100'
40' 40'
100'
18' 18'
60'
30' 30'
R/W
12' 12'
R/W
R/W
13'
13'
13'
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. TYPE 1 SERVICE
10' 10' #5 #5 #6
#6 #5
EX. R3-18
SNS
EX. R5-2
EX. R30(CA)
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
#5
EX. R30(CA)
EX. R14-1
R30(CA)
10'
10'
Ø6
Ø2
24'
13 14
5'
2'
2 LOOPS
2 LOOPS
8'
F=15' 12 R3-18
F=15'
EX. WIRELESS RADIO
10 15 5'
10 16 15 10
R/W
#5
(2I2U)
15'
3 LOOPS
10 R/W
#5
EX. RED CURB
EX. R30(CA)
(2I2L)
3'
3 LOOPS EX. RED CURB
EX. FIRE HYDRANT
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"E" SHALL BE 2'-6"
NOTE:

TOP OF CURB

NO SCALE
D E
E
BA
C
BCR
ECR

POLE LOCATION DETAIL
T.G. 733 - D4
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019
REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF T.S. SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION

PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JPTRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANKRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\TS_Plans\3-Rosecrans and Jefferson.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:06pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID USAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF LAWNDALE
100% CITY OF LAWNDALE
0609

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT JEFFERSON AVENUE
SP-1-T(N)
15 SP-1-T15

TYPE LEGEND

STREET NAME SIGN
M.A. H.P.S. * LENGTH
1 4
1(N)1(N)
NO. PED WATTS M.A. POLE

SIGNAL MOUNTING

POLE SCHEDULE
M.A.

SIGNAL
TYPE
POLE
6 LENGTH

LUMINAIRE
14 PHASE
PED. PUSH
12'
YEAR
----
SPEC
3 1A (7') ---- ---- ---- 1 2
Jefferson
2 1A (7') ---- ---- ---- 1 2
----
5 BUTTON
----
2022
----
--------
2022
---- 1 4
----
Jefferson
12'
----
SV-2-T
---- SV-1-T SP-1-T---- TP-1 ----
TP-1-T ----
SP-1-T(N)

A B C D E

POLE LOCATION
----

7.5'
----
9'
----------------
1'
----
7'
----

SEE PLAN
----------------

2.5'2.5'2.5'
2'4'

2.5'
----
--------
----
I.I.
----
Rosecrans Ave SEE PLAN

EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2 3 45 6 7 8

DUMMY DUMMY

1. REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2021 EDITION, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THE REFERENCED STANDARD PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. THE GPS UNIVERSAL TIME BASE UNIT/MODULE ANTENNA SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE TOP OF THE CONTROLLER CABINET.

3. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MARKED (TAGGED) WITHIN THE CONTROLLER CABINET FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION.

4. ALL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM.

5. (XXXX) INDICATES LOOP AND/OR VIDEO/RADAR DETECTION ZONE ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONTROLLER CABINET. EACH LOOP ASSIGNMENT SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE TO THE CONTROLLER.

6. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE ROUND (6' DIAMETER), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

7. INDICATES PROPOSED RADAR DETECTION ZONE.8. INDICATES PROPOSED RADAR DETECTION CAMERA.9. INDICATES BICYCLE LOOP DETECTOR.

10. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE CENTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LANE AND FRONT LOOPS SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND EDGE OF THE LIMIT LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

11. DETECTORS AND/OR VIDEO/RADAR DETECTION ZONES SHALL BE WIRED/RE-CONFIGURED PER DETECTOR ASSIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

13. POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. PRECISE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD AND VERIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.

14. ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO FURTHER THAN 5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF CROSSWALK OR LIMIT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

15. ALL SIGNING SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE TO BE PRESENT DURING THE INSTALLATION OF THE RADAR DETECTION SYSTEM ANDRADAR UNIT(S).

17. CONTACT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT (626) 300-2012 UPON START OF

SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND IMPLEMENTATION.

18. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON AT (310) 783-9315 FOR THE REMOVAL OF EXISTING STREET LIGHT.

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
19-4-100(N)
24-4-100(N)▲** 35'(N)
30'(N)
SV-2-T(N)SV-1-T(N) 12'(N)
10'(N) 200(N)
200(N)
200(N)
200(N) 4
4 I.I(N)I.I(N)

GENERAL NOTES
ALL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.I.I. - INDICATES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN.*INSTALL ALL HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTS WITH LED EQUIVALENT. HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHTS TO BE LED LIGHTING* * MODIFIED SIGNAL POLE HEIGHT OF 23'.(N) INDICATES NEW EQUIPMENT.ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES AND MAST ARMS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION.ALL SIGNAL MOUNTINGS SHALL BE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2021 EDITION.▲ NEAR HIGH VOLTAGE LINES. 2-MAS(N)2-MAS(N)
5 17 OF
FOR UTILITIES SEE SHEET 5 OF 11
11 PROPOSED SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2 3 45 6 7 8
OPERATION: Ø2 AND Ø6 ON VEHICLE RECALL
Ø4 ON NON-LOCK AND TIME DELAY FOR RIGHT TURNS
DUMMY
MANUFACTURED BY ACUITY LIGHTING (2700K) OR EQUIVALENT MODELS APPROVED BY AGENCY.

BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024

ROSECRANS AVENUE
60'
30' 30'
40' 40'
100'
40' 40'
100'
ECR
BCR
BCR
ECR

SUBSTRUCTURE LEGEND UTILITIES
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019

REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF TS SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\Utilities\3_ROSECRANS-JEFFERSON-Utility.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:06pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID SUSAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF LAWNDALE

UTILITY PLAN
100% CITY OF LAWNDALE
OF 17 0609 T.S.

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT JEFFERSON AVENUE
T.G. 733 - D4
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024

ROSECRANS AVENUE
12 2
4 5
6 22'
12' 11' 10' 10' 12' 13' 10' 2'
12' 11' 10' 10' 2' 10' 11' 14'
17' 16'
40' 40'
100'
40' 40'
43'

GRAMERCY
PLACE
13'
13'
13'
5' 5'
10' 10'
10' 10'
33'
EX. 3"C
EX. 2"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 2.5"C
EX. 2"C
EX. R28S(CA)
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED
CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. RED
CURB
EX. R28(S)(CA) (S
EX. TYPE III SERVICE P II SER

R/W R/W
EX. RED CURB
EX. R28S(CA)
EX. TYPE K-1(CA)
1 3
7 8
Ø6
Ø4 Ø4 Ø4 Ø6 Ø2
Ø4P
Ø2
Ø2
Ø4
Ø4P
Ø2P
Ø4
Ø2
Ø4P
Ø6P
Ø6
Ø4P
Ø2P
Ø6P
(2I3L) (6J3L)
(4I6L)
(4I6U)
BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
#6
#6
#5
#6
5 7
8 12
R4-7R6-2
OM2-1H
R4-7R6-2
OM2-1H
15 13
3 1
Ø6 15
Ø2
11 3
10'
5'
4 6
17 EV-A
18 F=15'
F=14'

EASEMENT FOR

TS FACILITIES
R EX. R28S(CA) /WR/W
EX. R28S(CA)
(2I2L)
9 14 3 LOOPS
16 14 75' 2 400'
3 LOOPS 10
(2I3U)(2I2U)
EX. RED CURB
R/W
R/W
(6J2L)
9 (6J2U)(6J3U)
3 LOOPS 10
14 2 380' 16 75'
3 LOOPS
14 CONSTRUCTION NOTES
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019
REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF T.S. SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION

PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JPTRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANKRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\TS_Plans\9-Rosecrans and Gramercy.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:07pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID USAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF GARDENA
T.G. 733 - H3
100% CITY OF GARDENA
2498
SP-2-T(N)
----
--------
1A
24-4-100 (N)**▲
1A1A

TYPE LEGEND

STREET NAME SIGN
M.A. HPS* LENGTH
4 1(N)
1 ----
---- ----
NO. M.A. POLE PED

SIGNAL MOUNTING

POLE SCHEDULE
M.A.

SIGNAL
TYPE
POLE
6 LENGTH

LUMINAIRE
14 PHASE
PED. PUSH
12'
----
----

YEARSPEC
ALL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.I.I. - INDICATES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN. 17M 20' ---- ---- 3 250
----
----
2 26-4-100 (N)▲ 2022 4'(N) 250(N) Nissin Foods ---- ---- --------
5 BUTTON
----
2022
----
40' (N)
---- ---- ----
250(N)
-------- 1 4
Rosecrans Ave
35' (N) SV-1-T(N) 8'(N) Gramercy Pl
TV-1-T
---- ---- TV-2-T
SV-1-T SP-2-T
SV-1-T(N) SP-1-T(N)
---- TV-1-T SP-1-T
7 15TS ---- SP-1-T 250
----
---- SV-1-T 8'

A B C D E

POLE LOCATION
------------
4'
----
----
11'
------------
--------
2'
----

3.5'

2.5'
----
---
--------

2.5'2.5'3.7'2.5'2.5'
8 1A ---- ---- TV-1-T SP-1-T ---- ---- 1 4 ---- ----
----
I.I.(N)I.I.(N)I.I.(N)
----
2' ---- ---- ---- 5.3'
---- 2.5' ---- ---- 4'---- ---- ---- 4' 6.5'
---- -------- ---- ---- ----
MAS
----
WATTS
* LED EQUIVALENT HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHT.

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"E" SHALL BE 2'-6"
NOTE:

TOP OF CURB

NO SCALE
D E
E
BA
C
BCR
ECR

POLE LOCATION DETAIL

EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2 3 45 6 7 8
OPERATION: Ø2 AND Ø6 ON VEHICLE RECALL
EV-A= Ø2 AND Ø6

1. REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2021 EDITION, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THE REFERENCED STANDARD PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MARKED (TAGGED) WITHIN THE CONTROLLER CABINET FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION.

3. ALL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM.

4. (XXXX) INDICATES LOOP ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONTROLLER CABINET. EACH LOOP ASSIGNMENT SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE TO THE CONTROLLER.

5. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE ROUND (6' DIAMETER), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6. ALL LOOPS SHALL BE CENTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE LANE AND FRONT LOOPS SHALL BE PLACED BEHIND THE LIMIT LINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

7. DETECTORS SHALL BE WIRED PER DETECTOR ASSIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.8. REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF WIRELESS RADIO EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA WILL BE DONE BY THE AGENCY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE SIGNAL SHOP AT (626) 458-1700 TEN (10) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE FOR COORDINATION.

9. POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. PRECISE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD AND VERIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.

10. ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO FURTHER THAN 5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF CROSSWALK OR LIMIT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

11. ALL SIGNING SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

12. CONTACT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT (626) 300-2012 UPON START OF

SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND IMPLEMENTATION.

13. DLC CABLE SHALL BE A SINGLE CONTINUOUS RUN INSTALLED WITH NO SPLICES EXCEPT WHERE IT CONNECTS TO LOOP WIRES.

GENERAL NOTES
13 17 OF 6 OF 11
FOR UTILITIES SEE SHEET 7 OF 11
ALL SIGNAL MOUNTINGS SHALL BE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2021 EDITION.(N) INDICATES NEW EQUIPMENT.** MODIFIED SIGNAL POLE HEIGHT OF 23'.▲ NEAR HIGH VOLTAGE LINES.ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES AND MAST ARMS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION. 2-MAS(N)2-MAS(N)

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT GRAMERCY PLACE
4 STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL BE PER CITY OF GARDENA SPECIFICATIONS.PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE BULLDOG TYPE OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL.

BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024

ROSECRANS AVENUE
17' 16'
40' 40'
100'
40' 40'
43'
100'
13' 13'
13'
5' 5'
33'
BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR

UTILITIES SUBSTRUCTURE LEGEND
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019

REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF TS SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\Utilities\9_ROSECRANS-GRAMERCY-Utility.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:07pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID SUSAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF GARDENA

UTILITY PLAN
100% CITY OF GARDENA
OF 17 2498 T.S.

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT GRAMERCY PLACE
T.G. 733 - H3
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
2 4
8 5
1 3
7 6
(2I4U)(2I4U)(2I4U)
(6J4L)
(6J4U)
(6J4U)
Ø3
Ø6
Ø6
Ø6P
Ø6P
Ø6
Ø3 Ø8 Ø8
Ø8P
Ø7
Ø8P
Ø4 Ø7
Ø4
Ø4P
Ø4P
Ø1
Ø2P
Ø2
Ø2
Ø2
Ø2P
Ø5 (5J1U)
(1I1U)
(8J8U) (8J8U) (8J8L)
(3I5U)
(4I8L)
(4I8U)
(7J5U)
13' 11' 10' 2' 10' 10' 2' 0 11' 13'
12' 11' 11' 10' 2' 10' 11' 13'
21' 11' 21 13' 10' 10' 11'
3I5
21' 10' 10' 10' 10' 11' 4'
100'
40' 40'
100'
ECR
BCR
BCR
ECR
BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
Ø1
Ø4
Ø8

BUS PAD
10' 10'
12'
10' 10' Ø5
13'
13'
13'
13'
12'
40' 40'
#6
#6
#6
#6
#5 #6
#6
#6
12' 12'
#6
Ø6
Ø2
F=12' F=15' R4-7 R6-2
OM2-1H
EV-C
EV-A
EV-B
EV-D
9 1
8 8
R4-7R6-2
OM2-1H
5 5
EX. 2-3"C
EX. 2"C
EX. 2.5"C
#
EX. 3"C
EX. 2.5"C
EX. 2"C
EX. 1-3"C
EX. 2"C
EX. 3"C
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED
CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. W4-2R28(S)(CA)
R/W

R/W R/W
R/W

R/W R/W
R/W
EX. TYPE III

SERVICE
EX. R3-7
EX. RED CURB
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS PRIORITY

ANTENNAS
3 11
9 11
4 9
9 9
14 14
F=12' F=15' F
(6J2L)
3 LOOPS 600'
80' 3 LOOPS
(6J3U)
(6J2U)
6 EX. 1"C,
3 DLC
EX. R3-4
EX. R3-2
EX. R3-2
EX. R3-2
OM2-1H
R/W
2 13 2
10 7
3'
(2I2L)
3 LOOPS
250' 80' 3 LOOPS
(2I2U)(2I3U)
6 EX. 1"C,
3 DLC
EX. RED CURB
7 2 13 10
2 4'
2 LOOPS 6
2 60' 10
6 2 LOOPS
EX. 1"C,
R/W 2 DLC
EX. RED CURB .
2 (4I6L)
2 LOOPS
470'
(4I6U)
7 12 2
13'
(8J6U)
75'
480'
2 LOOPS
(8J6U)
10 2 12
7 13'

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
100

ROSECRANS

WESTERN AVENUE AVENUE
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019
REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF T.S. SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\TS_Plans\10-Rosecrans and Western.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:08pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID USAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

TRAFFIC SIGNAL PLAN

CITY OF GARDENA
T.G. 733 - H3
100% CITY OF GARDENA

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT WESTERN AVENUE
609
SP-1-T (N)
SP-1-T
----
15 26-4-100 (N)▲**
15 26-4-100 (N)

TYPE LEGEND

STREET NAME SIGN
M.A. LENGTH
284
1 1(N)1(N)
NO. M.A. POLE PED

SIGNAL MOUNTING

POLE SCHEDULE
M.A.

SIGNAL
TYPE
POLE
6 LENGTH

LUMINAIRE
14 PHASE
PED. PUSH
----

YEARSPEC
3 26-4-70 40' 1 6
Western Ave
2 15 ---- 1 6
Western Ave
----
I.I. (N)
5 BUTTON
----
2022
----
45'(N)45'(N) I.I. (N)
2022
---- 1 8
Rosecrans Ave
SV-1-T (N)
SP-1-T
SV-2-TA
---- SV-2-TA
SV-1-T SP-1-T
SV-2-TA SP-1-T
SV-1-T (N) SP-1-T (N)
26-4-70 SP-1-T
1 4
7 ---- 40' SV-1-T Rosecrans Ave

A B C D E

POLE LOCATION
----

7.3'
----
9'
----
4'
----
----------------------------
----------------
5'
----

7.5'
0'
----
2'
----------------

4.5'2.5'3.5'
5'

7.5'2.5'5.5'
8 15 ---- ---- ----
---- -------- ----
15' (N) 250 (N)
1 2
----
----
----
----
----
----
SV-2-TA SP-1-T
2-MAS2-MAS
15'15'
3'
10' (N)
15'15'15' 6.5' ---- ---- ---- 2.5'
250
H.P.S.

WATTS*
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"E" SHALL BE 2'-6"
NOTE:

TOP OF CURB

NO SCALE
D E
E
BA
C
BCR
ECR

POLE LOCATION DETAIL

EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2 3 45 6 7 8
OPERATION: EV-A= Ø2+Ø5
EV-B= Ø4+Ø7

1. REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2021 EDITION, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THE REFERENCED STANDARD PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MARKED (TAGGED) WITHIN THE CONTROLLER CABINET FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION.

3. ALL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM.

4. (XXXX) INDICATES LOOP ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONTROLLER CABINET. EACH LOOP ASSIGNMENT SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE TO THE CONTROLLER.

7. DETECTORS SHALL BE WIRED PER DETECTOR ASSIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.8. REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF CCTV CAMERA SYSTEM WILL BE DONE BY CITY OF GARDENA POLICE DEPARTMENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT CAPTAIN TODD FOX AT (310) 217-9651 TEN (10) WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE FOR COORDINATION.

9. POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. PRECISE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD AND VERIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.

10. ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO FURTHER THAN 5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF CROSSWALK OR LIMIT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

11. ALL SIGNING SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

12. CONTACT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT (626) 300-2012 UPON START OF

SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND IMPLEMENTATION.

13. DLC CABLE SHALL BE A SINGLE CONTINUOUS RUN INSTALLED WITH NO SPLICES EXCEPT WHERE IT CONNECTS TO LOOP WIRES.

GENERAL NOTES:

EV-C= Ø1+Ø6EV-D= Ø3+Ø8
OF 17
FOR UTILITIES SEE SHEET 9 OF 11
ALL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.I.I. - INDICATES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN.*LED EQUIVALENT HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHT.* * MODIFIED SIGNAL POLE HEIGHT OF 23'.(N) INDICATES NEW EQUIPMENT.ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES AND MAST ARMS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION.ALL SIGNAL MOUNTINGS SHALL BE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2021 EDITION.▲ NEAR HIGH VOLTAGE LINES. 3-MAS (N)3-MAS (N)
I.I. (N)I.I. (N)
250250250250250
250 (N)
STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL BE PER CITY OF GARDENA SPECIFICATIONS.PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE BULLDOG TYPE OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL.

HOBART6
BLVD
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
100'
38' 38'
100'
40' 40'
100'
100'
38' 38'
40' 40'
ECR
BCR
BCR
ECR
BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR

SUBSTRUCTURE LEGEND UTILITIES

ROSECRANS

WESTERN AVENUE AVENUE
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019

REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF TS SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\Utilities\10 ROSECRANS-WESTERN-Utility.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:09pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID SUSAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF GARDENA

UTILITY PLAN
100% CITY OF GARDENA
OF 17 609 T.S.

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT WESTERN AVENUE
T.G. 733 - H3
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
CM
3 4
8 BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
BCR
BCR
ECR
4 4
11 14
14 10
10 9
10 9
10 16
16 R4-7R6-2
OM2-1H
11 11
12 R3-4
12 R3-4
1 R3-4 12
12 R3-4

ROSECRANS

NORMANDIE
AVENUE
AVENUE 1
2 7
5 6 ECR
R/W
(6J4L)
(6J4U)(6J4U)
(1I1U)
(2I4U)(2I4U)
(2I4L)
(5J1U)
(3I5U)
(8J8U)
(8J8L)
(4I8L)
(4I8U)
(7J5U)
Ø3 Ø8 Ø8
Ø5
Ø3
Ø6
Ø6
Ø1
Ø1
Ø4 Ø4 Ø7 Ø7
Ø2
Ø2
Ø5
Ø4P
Ø4P
Ø6P
Ø6P
Ø8P
Ø8P
Ø2P
Ø2P
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
R/W
R/W
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 2-3"C
12' 10' 10' 4' 10' 10' 11' 13'
13' 10' 10' 4' 10' 10' 11' 12'
13' 12' 10' 12' 13'
100'
40' 40'
80'
30' 30'
R/W
EX. BUS SIGN EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. R28S(CA)
EX. RED CURB
EX. BUS SIGN
EX. RED CURB
13' 12' 11' 11' 13'
R/W
10'
10'
EX. TYPE III

SERVICE
10' 10'
10' 10'
EV-C
10' 10' EV-D
P
EX. R28(S)
(CA) CR
EX. R28(S)(CA)
#5
#6
#5
#5
#6
EX. RED CURB
12'
12'
12'
12'
EX. RED CURB
EX. 3"C
EX. 3"C
EX. 1"C, 2 DLC
EX. 1"C,
2 DLC
EX. 1"C, 2 DLC
3 5' 15
6 2
8 5'
Ø6
11 Ø2
11 10' 15
15 10'
8 2
6 F=14'
F=12' F=15'
F=12' F=15'
R4-7R6-2
OM2-1H
F=14'
EV-B
EV-A
5 5
15 7
(6J2L)
R/
W
EX. 1"C, 2 DL
C
EX. R28(S)(CA)
EX. R
3-4
(6J2U)(6J3U)
13 17
18 2
0 3 LOO
P
S
41 0'
7 5' 3 LOO
P
S 17
7 (2I2L)
EX. 1"
C,
2 DL
C
R/
W
EX. R1-1
(2I2U)(2I3U)
13 3 LOO
P
S 17
2 0 44
0' 18
7 5'
3 LOO
P
S 17
7 EX. 1"C, 2 DLC
EX. R26(S)(CA)
17 2 LOOPS
(4I6U)
13 17
18 240' 19
75'
2 LOOPS
(4I6L)
7 EX. 1"C, 2 DLC
17 2 LOOPS
(8J6U) 13
17 18
19 480'
40'
2 LOOPS
(8J6L)

CONSTRUCTION NOTES
T.G. 733 - J3
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019
REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF T.S. SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JPTRAFFIC SIGNAL PLANKRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\TS_Plans\11-Rosecrans and Normandie.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:10pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID USA
N E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF GARDENA
100% CITY OF GARDENA

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT NORMANDIE AVENUE
4048

EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
OPERATION: EV-A= Ø2 + Ø5
EV-B= Ø4 + Ø7
SP-1-T (N)
SP-1-T
----
15 29-5-100 (N)
15 29-5-100 (N)

TYPE LEGEND

STREET NAME SIGN
M.A. LENGTH
284
1 1(N)
NO. M.A. POLE PED

SIGNAL MOUNTING

POLE SCHEDULE
M.A.

SIGNAL
TYPE
POLE
6 LENGTH

LUMINAIRE
14 PHASE
PED. PUSH
----

YEARSPEC
3 24-4-100 (N) 35'(N)
6 Normandie Ave
2 15 ---- 1 6
Normandie Ave
----
I.I. (N)
5 BUTTON
20222022
----
**40'(N)**45'(N) I.I. (N)
2022
---- 1 8
I.I. (N) Rosecrans Ave
SV-1-T (N)
SV-1-T
---- SV-1-T SP-1-T
SV-1-T (N) SP-1-T (N)
SV-1-T SP-1-T
3-MAS (N) SV-1-T (N) SP-1-T (N)
24-4-100 (N) SP-1-T (N)
1 4
7 2022 35'(N) SV-1-T (N) I.I. (N) Rosecrans Ave
A
B
C
D
E

POLE LOCATION
8 15 ---- ---- ----
---- -------- ----
15' (N) 250 (N)
2 ----
----
----
----
----
----
SV-1-T SP-1-T
2-MAS (N)3-MAS (N)2-MAS (N)
12'
15' (N)
12'
15' (N)
12'
15' (N)
12'
---- ---- 10' ---- 2.5'
5' ---- ---- ---- 3'
---- ---- 3' ---- 2.5'

13.5' ---- ---- ---- 3.5'
---- ---- 5' ---- 5.5'

12.5' ---- ---- ---- 2.5'
---- ---- 7.5' ---- 3.5'

5.3' ---- ---- ---- 3'
H.P.S
WATTS
*
250
250 (N)
250
250 (N)
250
250 (N)
250
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
"E" SHALL BE 2'-6"
NOTE:

TOP OF CURB

NO SCALE
D
E
E
B A
C
BCR
ECR

POLE LOCATION DETAIL

1. REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2021 EDITION, THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THE REFERENCED STANDARD PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.

2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MARKED (TAGGED) WITHIN THE CONTROLLER CABINET FOR PHASE IDENTIFICATION.

3. ALL SIGNAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE WIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EXISTING SIGNAL PHASE DIAGRAM.

4. (XXXX) INDICATES LOOP ASSIGNMENT IN THE CONTROLLER CABINET. EACH LOOP ASIGNMENT SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE LEAD-IN CABLE TO THE CONTROLLER.

9. POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. PRECISE LOCATIONS SHALL BE ESTABLISHED IN THE FIELD AND VERIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.

10. ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES WITH PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE INSTALLED NO FURTHER THAN 5 FEET FROM THE BACK OF CROSSWALK OR LIMIT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

11. ALL SIGNING SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE INSTALLED, RELOCATED, OR REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

12. CONTACT LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AT (626) 300-2012 UPON START OF

SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO COORDINATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING AND IMPLEMENTATION.

13. DLC CABLE SHALL BE A SINGLE CONTINUOUS RUN INSTALLED WITH NO SPLICES EXCEPT WHERE IT CONNECTS TO LOOP WIRES.

GENERAL NOTES:
15 17 OF
FOR UTILITIES SEE SHEET 11 OF 11
ALL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.I.I. - INDICATES INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN.*LED EQUIVALENT HIGHWAY SAFETY LIGHT.* * MODIFIED FOR MOUNTING ON TYPE 29 POLE(N) INDICATES NEW EQUIPMENT.ALL NEW SIGNAL POLES AND MAST ARMS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS STANDARD PLANS, 2023 EDITION.ALL SIGNAL MOUNTINGS SHALL BE PER STANDARD PLANS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION, 2021 EDITION.

EV-C= Ø1 + Ø6EV-D= Ø3 + Ø8
1(N)1(N)1(N)
STREET NAME SIGNS SHALL BE PER CITY OF GARDENA SPECIFICATIONS.PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS SHALL BE BULLDOG TYPE OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL.

BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
CM
100'
40' 40'
100'
40' 40'
80'
30' 30'
CM
4 BCR
ECR
ECR
BCR
BCR
BCR
ECR
ECR
80'
30' 30'

UTILITIES SUBSTRUCTURE LEGEND

ROSECRANS

NORMANDIE AVENUE AVENUE
DATE:

TS-TSC-DC - 07/2019

REVISIONS SCALE I/S OF TS SHEET OF

DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
11 PLAN TS
1" - 20'

ROSECRANS AVENUE (EAST) TSSP
PROJECT ID NO. TSM0010255 PCA NO. X742331006

JP KRR JP
TIME: FILE:V:\2042\active\2042542900\drawing\sheet_files\Rosecrans\Utilities\11 ROSECRANS-NORMANDIE-Utility.dwg 12/22/23 - 2:10pm jopark

DATEDATE
APPROVEDBY:

REVIEWED LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SUSAN E. REID SUSAN E REID R.C.E. NO. DATE R C E NO 5687212-22-23

CITY OF GARDENA

UTILITY PLAN
100% CITY OF GARDENA
OF 17 4048 T.S.

ROSECRANS AVENUE

AT NORMANDIE AVENUE
T.G. 733 - J3
BY:

REVIEW
01/02/2024
Attachment D
JEFFERSON AVE. AT ROSECRANS AVE. (100% LAWNDALE)
FIRMONA AVE./RAMONA AVE. AT ROSECRANS AVE. (84.4% LAWNDALE)

Approval of Renewal Agreement with Los Angeles County Animal Control for After Hours Use

BACKGROUND
The City of Lawndale (herein referred to as the City) has had a long-standing contract with Los Angeles County Animal Care and Control (herein referred to as the County) to provide assistance to the City for animal care services after hours. The most current five-year contract with the County to provide kennel and animal care services outside of the standard City operating hours (7:00 am until 6:00 pm seven days a week) is scheduled to be renewed.

STAFF REVIEW
The City provides animal control services seven days a week between the hours of 7:00 am and 6:00 pm, and partners with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Los Angeles (SPCALA) during these hours for kennel and animal care services.

The City also has an agreement with the County to provide after-hours care for animal related emergencies outside of the city’s standard operating hours. Animal related emergencies include animal attacks, animals that have been injured, or animal calls involving the Sheriff’s Department.

At the option of the County Board of Supervisors and the consent of the City Council, the City-County Municipal Services Agreement for after-hours care may be renewed for successive periods not to exceed five years each renewal. Presented for City Council’s approval is a continuation of animal emergency services for a five-year period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029.

The agreement includes an adjusted level of services from previous years including an “opt-out” option which requires that the County contact a designated City employee (Director of Municipal Services) before providing any service. This is to eliminate calls for service emanating from residents calling the County directly after hours without advising the City.

Rates are established by the County Auditor-Controller and are subject to change annually. The current year rates are included as an attachment to this Staff Report.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report and approves it as to form.

FISCAL REVIEW
There is sufficient budget for this item, therefore no additional budget is needed.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City-County Municipal Services Agreement with the County on Los Angeles Department of Animal Care and Control and authorize the Mayor to execute it on behalf of the City and authorize the City Manager to execute the Service Level Request on behalf of the City.

Attachments
Attachment A - Services Agreement.pdf
Attachment B - LA County Agreement.pdf
Attachment C - Billing Rates.pdf

BACKGROUND
ESMoA is an art Museum focused around experimental and unique art and artists that has a presence in a number of neighboring cities in the South Bay and Southern California. ESMoA opened their doors to the public at their Lawndale facility in December 2023, and since opening have participated in numerous City Sponsored events including Coffee with a Cop, Halloween Haunt, Chalk Away Project, as well as hosting art programs for children and neighborhood schools. In the short time that ESMoA has been operating in the City of Lawndale, they have brought a unique and welcome connection to the art world for Lawndale residents and have added a cultural presence to the community.

STAFF REVIEW
ESMoA operates entirely on donations and grants, so that they can offer free admission into their museum as well as host art programs free of charge for residents and members of the community. ESMoA is currently applying for a grant from the Los Angeles County Department of Arts and Culture and is seeking a letter of recommendation from the Lawndale City Council to present to the grant review board stating their purpose and to highlight the benefits that their unique vision of art has brought to Lawndale residents.

As ESMoA relies solely on donations and funds, in order to provide their services, this grant will help ESMoA to continue to provide an enlightening and educational voice within the community. ESMoA’s Director of Operations, Barbara Boehm has stated that the funds that this grant will provide will be used for operational costs such as paying rents, utilities, and other day to day costs which help the Museum to remain open.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report and approves it as to form.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Finance Director has reviewed this staff report and there are no costs to the City as a result of staff’s recommendation.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a Letter of Recommendation for Experimentally Structured Museum of Art (ESMoA) to be submitted with their grant application to the Los Angeles County Department of Arts and Culture.

Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
Grace Huizar, Senior Management Analyst
SUBJECT:

Authorize the Purchase of Food Scrap Kitchen Pails for the Residential Organics Program utilizing SB 1383 Program Grant Funds

BACKGROUND

STAFF REVIEW

LEGAL REVIEW

FISCAL IMPACT
In September 2016, Senate Bill 1383 was passed to serve as a statewide effort to reduce emissions of Short Lived Climate Pollutants (SLCP) and reduce statewide disposal of organic waste and edible food. Methane gas is a SLCP that is created in landfills when organic waste naturally decomposes. In accordance with this law, all jurisdictions must provide recycling and organics waste collection services to all residential and commercial organic waste (food and yard waste) generators. This will help divert organic materials from landfills. In addition to organics recycling collection programs, SB1383 regulations also require businesses to minimize throwing out “edible food” by requiring the implementation of an Edible Food Program. To aid cities in meeting compliance with SB 1383, the State of California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) released funding opportunities through its Local Assistance Grant Program. The City applied for these grants under Resolution No. CC-1908-042 which authorizes the submittal of applications for all CalRecycle grants for which the City of Lawndale is eligible. The first grant, OWR1 was released in May 2022 to provide cities and counties with initial funding to implement SB 1383 required programs including education, outreach, food recovery, collection, capacity planning, procurement, record-keeping, enforcement, inspection, and program evaluation projects. A second phase, OWR4, was released in November 2023.

The City of Lawndale received grant awards from the Local Assistance Grant Program in the amount of $47,128, on or about, June 1, 2022 and $88,065, on June 4, 2024. The total of $135,193 from CalRecycle must be used on projects and activities in accordance with the Local Assistance Grant Program guidelines.

The City of Lawndale is taking steps to encourage residents to properly dispose of their food waste. Staff is proposing to purchase 5,700 counter-top kitchen food scrap pails for the Lawndale residents. The selected food scrap pail has a two-gallon capacity and is portable and reusable with a tight-fitting lid. The pails will be offered to all single-family households and multi-family dwellings at no charge; one pail per household.

The counter-top pail is to be used to collect kitchen food scraps until it is time to transfer it to a backyard compost bin or the curbside green cart for collection.

The City Attorney has reviewed the staff report.

RECOMMENDATION
Attachments
Attachment A Vendor Quotation Form.pdf
Three quotes were received by the City for 5,700 kitchen pails and the lowest price per unit quote was selected from HTT Apparel. The unit cost is $4.75 plus sales tax for a total cost of $29,850.19. This purchase will be funded by SB 1383 Grant Fund 286.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of food scrap kitchen pails from HTT Apparel for a total cost of $29,850.19 funded by the SB 1383 grant funds in compliance with the Local Assistance Grant Program guidelines.

Attachment A
QUOTATIONS – VENDORS

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE
LAWNDALE, CA 90260
(310) 973-3200
BIDS FROM VENDORS ARE NECESSARY WHEN AMOUNT PER ARTICLE EXCEEDS $300.00. ATTACH TO PURCHASE ORDER REQUISITIONS FOR MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES.

VENDOR #1: HTT Apparel VENDOR #2: Sure-Close VENDOR #3: Cascade Engineering ADDRESS: 41185 Raintree Ct. ADDRESS: ADDRESS: 5175 36th St SE CITY/ST/ZIP: Murrieta, CA 92562 CITY/ST/ZIP: CITY/ST/ZIP: Grand Rapids, MI 49512 CONTACT: John Solek CONTACT: [email protected] CONTACT: Josh Royce PHONE: 951-304-0400 PHONE: PHONE:

REMARKS: Due to time frame of changing new vendor and supplies on hand could not wait on vendor #3 (left several messages, no response).

QUANTITY DESCRIPTION VENDOR #1 VENDOR #2 VENDOR #3

PRICE UNIT AMOUNT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT PRICE UNIT AMOUNT
5,700 Food Scrap Kitchen Pail $4.75 ea $27,075.00 $4.95 ea $28,215.00 $6.00 ea $34,200.00

SUBTOTAL: $27,075.00 $28,215.00 $34,200.00

10.25% TAX: $2,775.19 $2,892.04 $3,505.50
GRAND TOTAL: $29,850.19 $31,107.04 $37,705.50
6 CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Peter Kann, Interim Planning Manager MBI Consultant SUBJECT: 30-day Amnesty Program for Residential Properties Out of Compliance

BACKGROUND
Some residential property owners initiated improvements to the homes without the benefit of the planning approvals or building permits. These unpermitted improvements included but are not limited to room additions, electrical work, plumbing, mechanical work, covered patios, accessory dwelling units, solar systems, and other home improvement projects.

Some property owners may have undertaken improvements on above-referenced work without the benefit of required permits. Completed work may have been performed either as a owner/building or with assistance of a contractor.

Acknowledging that this unpermitted work may have occurred, at the request of the Mayor, staff developed a program to encourage property owners to legalize construction that may have occurred during this time period and to encourage compliance. The Amnesty Program for unpermitted construction creates a streamlined process to legalize unpermitted construction and bring it into compliance with current zoning and building regulations.

STAFF REVIEW
The 30-Day Amnesty program includes a simplified path to legalizing unpermitted construction if the residential property owner meets all of the following criteria:
30 days only (From: January 2 through 31, 2025).

Residential projects;
Have no current code enforcement actions;
Applies only for structures;
Amnesty applications that meet the requirements can apply for a building permit/plan check, no site plan review application would be required.

All applicable regulations of the zoning and building code will stay in effect.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The request is not a "Project" as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15378, a "Project" means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. According to Section 15378(b), a Project does not include: (5) Organizational or administrative activities of the government that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

LEGAL REVIEW
Not required.

FISCAL IMPACT
The amnesty program by not requiring a site plan review application for each eligible application, will result in a limited fiscal impact to the Community Development Department that will vary depending on the number of applications received. However, the program applicant will still be responsible for payment of the applicable building plan check and building permit fees.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Staff recommends that the City Council consider the 30-day Amnesty Program for Residential Properties and direct staff to advertise and implement the program; or

2. Provide further direction to staff.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Mayor/City Councilmembers Report of Attendance at Meetings and/or Events No supporting documentation was forwarded to the City Clerk Department for this item.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Public Employee Performance Evaluation - City Manager

BACKGROUND
The City Council will hold a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b), to conduct an employee evaluation concerning the City Manager.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation

BACKGROUND
The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4), to discuss the potential initiation of litigation: one (1) case.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: October 7, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation

BACKGROUND
The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with legal counsel regarding a significant exposure to litigation, the facts and circumstances of which are not known to the potential plaintiff.

Lawndale City CouncilOctober 7, 2024

Lawndale City Council
October 7, 2024