Agenda packet — Lawndale City Council, November 18, 2024 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF LAWNDALE

AGENDA OF THE LAWNDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Monday, November 18, 2024, 6:30 PM
14717 Burin Ave
Lawndale, CA 90260
Any person who wishes to address the City Council regarding any item listed on this agenda or any other matter that is within its subject matter jurisdiction is invited, but not required, to fill out a Public Meeting Speaker Card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the oral communications portion of the meeting. The purpose of the card is to ensure that the speaker’s name is correctly recorded in the meeting minutes and, where appropriate, to provide contact information for staff follow-up.

How to observe the Meeting:

To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can now observe the meeting in person. Members of the public are still be able to view the meeting on YouTube “Lawndale CityTV”, the City Website, and Lawndale Community Cable Television on Spectrum and Frontier Channel 3.

Copies of this Agenda may be obtained prior to the meeting inside the Lawndale City Hall foyer or on the City Website. Interested parties may contact the City Clerk Department at (310) 973-3213 for clarification regarding individual agenda items.

This Agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours before the meeting.

A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
B. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
C. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update
D. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) E. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items 2 through 4 will be considered and acted upon under one motion unless a City Councilmember removes individual items for further City Council consideration or explanation.

2. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda — Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

3. Accounts Payable Register
— Recommendation: that the City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2411-103 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $2,915,262.25.

4. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, November 4, 2024 — Recommendation: that City Council approve the minutes.

G. ADMINISTRATION

5. General Municipal Election 2024 Unofficial Results
— Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file this report.

6. Award of Construction Services to Mariposa Landscapes Inc. for the City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project
— Recommendation: that the City Council award a construction services in the amount of $797,716.77 to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., for the City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project.

7. Update for City Council on Animal Control Contract with SPCA — Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file this staff report.

8. Traffic Calming on 147th Street Update
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Receive and file the Traffic Study report provided by Advantec Consulting Engineers; or 2.) Provide further direction to staff.

9. Case No. 24-23: City Council confirmation of the Planning Commission's Interpretation of the Land Use Determination, classifying dog grooming a permitted use in the Commercial Manufacturing (C-M) Zone for a proposed business at 4613 W Rosecrans Ave
— Recommendation: that the City Council Adopt Resolution No. CC-2411-104, setting forth findings of fact relative to the submitted application, which approves the Land use Determination application.

10. Approval to Dispose of One Vehicle for the Community Development Department — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the sale of the 2007 Ford Escape Hybrid through the City's standard public auction process facilitated by Ken Porter Auctions in Carson, California.

11. Request for Approval of Additional Fees for Outgoing Animal Control Contract with SPCA for 2023-2024 Fiscal Year Contract
— Recommendation: that the City Council approve the additional cost and budget amendment to account 100-300- 530.100 for $14,720 for the 2023-24 Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals contract.

H. CITY MANAGER REPORT
I. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

12. Contractor Transparency
Requested by Mayor Pullen-Miles.
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Consider the Contractor Transparency Policy and direct staff to update the City's forms to implement the policy; or 2.) Provide further direction to staff.

13. Mayor/City Councilmembers Report of Attendance at Meetings and/or Events J. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, December 2, 2024, in the Lawndale City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

It is the intention of the City of Lawndale to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, we will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the City Clerk Department (310) 973-3213 prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodation to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held on November 18, 2024, was posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
/s/ Yvette Palomo
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Date Posted: November 14, 2024

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: November 18, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT:

Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda

BACKGROUND
California Government Code reads, in part, as follows:
"Except when, after reading the title, further reading is waived by regular motion adopted by majority vote, all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of introduction or passage."

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2411-103 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $2,915,262.25.

Attachments
A. CC-2411-103 - AP Resolution - Nov. 18, 2024.pdf

ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO. CC-2411-103

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA

AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
IN THE SUM OF $2,915,262.25

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That in accordance with Sections 37202 and 37209 of the Government Code, the Director of Finance, as ce1tified below, hereby attests to the accuracy of these demands and to the availability of funds for the payment thereof.

SECTION 2. That the following claims and demands have been audited as required by law, and that appropriations for these claims and demands are included in the annual budget as approved by the City Council.

SECTION 3. That the claims and demands paid by check numbers 206717 through 206782 • for the aggregate total of $2,915,262.25 are hereby authorized.

Effective Date: November 18th
, 2024
Approve£ _
_....p Hrant Manuelian, Director of Finance
Grego1y M. Murphy, City Attorney
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November 2024.

ATTEST:

State of California
County of Los Angeles
City of Lawndale
)
)
)
Robe1t Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ss
I, Erica Harbison, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, California, do hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lawndale duly approved and adopted the foregoing Resolution No. CC-2411- 103 at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following roll call vote:

Name Voting Present, Not Voting Absent Aye No Abstain Not Patticipating Robe1t Pullen-Miles, Mayor
Bernadette Suarez, Mayor Pro Tern
Pat Kearney
Rhonda H. Gorman
Sirley Cuevas
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
Resolution No. CC-2411-103
2 City of Lawndale
Summary of Audited Claims and Demands
Claims and Demands Paid By Check:

Check Date
10/31/2024
__
11/7 /2024
Beginning
Total Checks
206717
206751
Check Number
Claims and Demands Paid By Electronic ACH Transfer:

Date Name of Payee Description
Total ACH Payments
Total Audited Claims and Demands Paid
Ending
206750
206782
Amount
Aggregate Total
2,104,230.48
811,031.77
2,915,262.25

0.00 2,915,262.25
Check Register Report
City of Lawndale BANK: WELLS FARGO BANK N.A
Check Number Check Date Status Void/Stop Date Vendor Number Vendor Name WELLS FARGO BANK N.A Checks
206717 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8357 4LEAF INC.
206718 10/31/2024 Reconciled 0112 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SVCS, INC 206719 10/31/2024 Reconciled 6369 AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC. 206720 10/31/2024 Reconciled 7660 ARAMSCO INC
206721 10/31/2024 Reconciled 2207 ASAP SIGN & BANNER, LLC 206722 10/31/2024 Reconciled 4333 CALIF BLDG STANDARDS COMMISSIO 206723 10/31/2024 Reconciled 2893 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC.
206724 10/31/2024 Reconciled 0190 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENTS, INC 206725 10/31/2024 Reconciled 0216 DELTA DENTAL
206726 10/31/2024 Printed 0389 DELTA DENTAL INS
206727 10/31/2024 Printed 0217 DEPT OF ANIMAL CARE & CONTROL 206728 10/31/2024 Printed 8129 DEPT OF CONSERVATION
206729 10/31/2024 Printed 8307 DEVELOPERS GENERAL CONTRACTING 206730 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8238 DOERSCHEL & ASSOCIATES, LLC 206731 10/31/2024 Printed 6636 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
206732 10/31/2024 Printed 8312 GALLAGHER BENEFIT SERVICES INC 206733 10/31/2024 Printed 5180 HARRIS COMPUTER SYSTEMS
206734 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8392 HEAD TO TOE
206735 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8150 HEAL TH AND HUMAN RESOURCE 206736 10/31/2024 Reconciled 0308 LOS ANGELES COUNTY
206737 10/31/2024 Reconciled 6445 MICHAEL BAKER INTL, INC 206738 10/31/2024 Printed 7890 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC 206739 10/31/2024 Printed 1140 PACIFIC TIRE OF LAWNDALE 206740 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8355 PORTILLO PRODUCTIONS
206741 10/31/2024 Reconciled 5895 RICOH USA INC
206742 10/31/2024 Reconciled 6896 SEQUEL CONTRACTORS INC 206743 10/31/2024 Reconciled 6034 SOUTH COAST MECHANICAL LLC 206744 10/31/2024 Printed 8177 SOUTHWEST PATROL, INC.
206745 10/31/2024 Reconciled 2002 THE STANDARD, UNIT 22 206746 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8388 TRIFORMIS CORPORATION 206747 10/31/2024 Reconciled 3672-FLEET U.S. BANK VOYAGER FLEET SYS 206748 10/31/2024 Reconciled 7059 VIEN DONG DAILY NEWS
206749 10/31/2024 Reconciled 0479 VISION SERVICE PLAN
206750 10/31/2024 Reconciled 8270 WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL
Total Checks: 34
Total Payments: 34
Total Payments: 34
Date: 11/07/2024
Time:

Page:

Check Description

CDD PERMIT TECHNICIAN SVCS

SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICES
CREDIT INV#637297

CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
FIELD OF HONOR BANNERS (2)

SURCHARGE QTR ENDING
ASSOC PLANNER CONSUL TING SVCSOCT. 2024-INS PRE-TAX/POST TAX OCT. 2024 DENTAL PREMIUM
OCT. 2024 DENTAL PREMIUM

ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
Q3 2024 - STRONG MOTION FEES
CITY HALL & PW IMPROV. PROJECT

SYSTEM INTEGRATION CONSULTING

FAX LINE & INTERNET FOR PWD

RECRUITMENT SVCS - PWD

ANNUAL CITYVIEW SOFTWARE

FOOD SCRAP KITCHEN CONTAINERS
OCT. 2024 EMPLOYEE ASSIST

PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES -

CDD MANAGER CONSULTING SVCS -

OFFICE SUPPLIES
1 NEW TIRE & 1 TIRE REPAIR -

DJ/MC SERVICE - HALLOWEEN

LEASE CHARGES FOR COPIERS -
2022/23 ANNUAL ST. IMPROV.

HVAC REPAIR - DRAIN PAN

ARMED SECURITY SERVICES

LIFE,AD&D,LTD INSURANCE PREM -

EARTH MACHINE COMPOST BINS

FLEET SERVICES-FUEL

NOTICE OF ELECTION
VISION PREMIUM OCT. 2024

TRAINING &CLOSING - AN SYSTEM
Checks Total (excluding void checks):

Bank Total (excluding void checks):

Grand Total (excluding void checks}:
12:38 pm
1 Amount
8,190.00
7,817.04
36,501.05
948.28
231.53
111.00
15,150.00
2,238.06
2,045.86
311.20
150.00
296.30
276,050.44
4,000.00
234.53
6,250.00
25,427.90
29,850.19

72.90 630,972.06
21,840.00
649.76
420.00
700.00
1,756.86
1,010,752.28
533.59
10,400.00
1,646.65
2,131.95
3,717.33

87.50 1,132.22
1,614.00
2,104,230.48
2,104,230.48
2,104,230.48
Check Register Report
Date: 11/07/2024
Time: 12:43 pm
City of Lawndale BANK: WELLS FARGO BANK N.A Page: 1
Check Number Check Date Status Void/Stop Date Vendor Number Vendor Name Check Description Amount WELLS FARGO BANK N.A Checks
206751 11/07/2024 Printed 8285 ADORAMA INC. SACHTLER CAMERA TRIPOD 2,374.80 206752 11/07/2024 Printed 8214 VANESA ALVAREZ MEAL REIMB. - MUNICIPAL 295.77 206753 11/07/2024 Printed 4185-WEST AMERICAN STRUCTURAL PEST ONE-TIME SVCS/ROACHES - 205.00 206754 11/07/2024 Printed 0472 AMERINAT SERVICE RELEASE TRANSFER FEES 300.00 206755 11/07/2024 Printed 2263 B&H PHOTO-VIDEO SONY 70-2000 MM CAMERA 17,417.29 206756 11/07/2024 Printed 7785 BERICOM DESIGN NETWORK MAINTENANCE & SUPPORT 13,565.82 206757 11/07/2024 Printed 0158 CALIFORNIA JPIA 2024/25 POLLUTION LIABILITY 2,523.00 206758 11/07/2024 Printed 7889 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET SERVICES 1,855.05 206759 11/07/2024 Printed 7934A COMPUTERSHARE CORPORATE TRUST TRUSTEE FEE- LAWNDALE RDA 2009 2,500.00 206760 11/07/2024 Printed 0219 COUNTY OF LA DEPT OF PUBLIC WK INDUSTRIAL WASTE - SEP 2024 14,673.06 206761 11/07/2024 Printed 0219 COUNTY OF LA DEPT OF PUBLIC WK BUILDING & SAFETY SERVICES 32,814.91 206762 11/07/2024 Printed 1820 DIGITAL MAP PRODUCTS, LP SUBSCRIPTION & LICENSE FEE - 17,338.75 206763 11/07/2024 Printed 6636 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS PHONE CHARGE - W. GREEN PARK 180.11 206764 11/07/2024 Printed 8394 MARK HERZ CONS & DEMO DEPOSIT REFUND 430.50 206765 11/07/2024 Printed 6944 RHONDA HOFMANN-GORMAN MILEAGE REIMB. - CCCA FALL 89.70 206766 11/07/2024 Printed 0380 PAT KEARNEY MILEAGE REIMB.- BOARD MEETING 13.40 206767 11/07/2024 Printed 2773 L. A. CNTY DEPT PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SIGNAL ACCIDENT REPAIR 13,000.16 206768 11/07/2024 Printed 0308 LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES 630,972.06 206769 11/07/2024 Printed 7940 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 39,973.88 206770 11/07/2024 Printed 6134 JOHN MARTINEZ PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 100.00 206771 11/07/2024 Printed 8286 MARVIN SERVICES INC REPLACE OXYGEN SENSOR - 599.49 206772 11/07/2024 Printed 5560 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC US, INC ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1,060.46 206773 11/07/2024 Printed 1140 PACIFIC TIRE OF LAWNDALE 2 NEW TIRES - VEH#491 450.00 206774 11/07/2024 Printed 7764 NI KAL S. PRICE PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 100.00 206775 11/07/2024 Printed 6123 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY WEEKLY MOP CHARGES 201.42 206776 11/07/2024 Printed 3915 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING SUPPLEMENTAL PAGES& SHIPPING 1,100.00 206777 11/07/2024 Printed 2051 MADONNA SITKA PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 100.00 206778 11/07/2024 Printed 6680 SCOTT SMITH PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 206779 11/07/2024 Printed 0444 SPCA LA ANIMAL SHELTERING 13,700.00 206780 11/07/2024 Printed 3672-CCK U.S. BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT CREDIT CARD PAYMENT 1,182.20 206781 11/07/2024 Printed 3672-CMD U.S. BANK CREDIT CARD PAYMENT 1,814.94 206782 11/07/2024 Printed 6112 DANIEL URRUTIA PLANNING COMMISSION STIPEND 50.00 Total Checks: 32 Checks Total (excluding void checks): 811,031.77 Total Payments: 32 Bank Total (excluding void checks): 811,031.77 Total Payments: 32 Grand Total (excluding void checks): 811,031.77 Council Meeting 11/18/2024
Details of US Bank Credit Card Charges
Date Vendor
Vendor# 3672-CCK
9/25/2024 Amazon
9/25/2024 Amazon
9/30/2024 The Korea Daily
9/30/2024 Costco
10/7/2024 Amazon
10/7/2024 Costco
10/8/2024 Amazon
10/8/2024 Amazon
10/9/2024 Amazon
10/10/2024 Amazon
10/11/2024 Amazon
10/18/2024 Hobby Lobby
10/22/2024 Amazon
10/22/2024 Amazon
10/22/2024 Amazon
Check Date 11/07/2024; Check# 206780
Date Vendor
Vendor# 3672-CMD
8/20/2024 California Contract Cities Association
9/8/2024 Mission Pacific Hotel, Oceanside, CA
9/8/2024 Mission Pacific Hotel, Oceanside, CA
9/16/2024 Smart & Final
9/16/2024 Pollo Camp_ero
Check Date U/07/2024; Check# 206781
Description
Raffle prizes/ decor items for Employee Recognition event Raffle prizes/ decor items/ gift bags for Employee Recognition event Notice of Candidates newsppaer ad (GME 2024)
Raffle prizes/gift cards for Employee Recognition event Raffle prizes for Employee Recognition event
Raffle prizes/ chocolate for Employee Recognition event Raffle prizes for Employee Recognition event
Raffle prizes for Employee Recognition event
Refund for raffle prize not received from vendor
Raffle prizes for Employee Recognition event
Gift bags for all staff/tissue paper/ party favors for employee recognition event Vases for centerpieces
Returned raffle prizes - not satisfied w/ quality
Returned raffle prizes - not satisfied w/ quality
Returned raffle prize - not satisfied w/ quality
Description
CCCA Board Meeting - R. Pullen-Miles - 8/21/24
2 Nts Hotel & Parking - CCCA Conference - P. Kearney - Sept 2024 2 Nts Hotel & Parking* - CCCA Conference - R. Hofmann Gorman Refreshments (Qty 2) for Pre-Council Mtg Dinners
Pre Council Meeting Meals - 5 elected meals & 10 Staff meals - Sept. 16, 2024 City Council Meeting
Petty Cash
*No petty cash replenishment during this period.

Amount
152.48
192.28
160.00
226.99

97.95 97.01

81.97 41.87
(22.04)

22.04 163.13

72.63 (14.87)
(56.18)
(33.06)
$ 1,182.20
Amount

30.00 780.28
805.28

5.56 193.82
$ 1,814.94
1 of 1

Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, November 4, 2024

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council approve the minutes.

Attachments
Minutes 11-04-2024.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

DRAFT MINUTES

LAWNDALE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
November 4, 2024
A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Pullen-Miles called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

Councilmembers Present: Mayor Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor Pro Tem Bernadette Suarez, Councilmember Rhonda Hofmann Gorman, Councilmember Sirley Cuevas, Councilmember Pat Kearney Other Participants: City Manager Sean M. Moore, City Attorney Gregory M. Murphy, City Clerk Erica Harbison, Assistant City Clerk Yvette Palomo, Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources Raylette Felton, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Captain Nicole Palomino, Los Angeles County Fire Department Acting Assistant Fire Chief Brian Kane, Municipal Services Director Michael Reyes, Finance Director Hrant Manuelian, Community Services Director Jason Minter, Public Works Director Lucho Rodriguez B. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
Councilmember Kearney led the flag salute. Pastor Matthew Harbison of Lawndale Wesleyan Church provided the inspiration.

C. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update
Captain Palomino summarized the recent law enforcement activities.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez asked about increased graffiti in the City.

Captain Palomino responded that they are aware of the increase in graffiti and are addressing it.

2. Los Angeles County Fire Department Update
Acting Assistant Fire Chief Kane reported the recent fire department activities.

D. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) Matthew Harbison, Resident, thanked the City for the Halloween Haunt event and for their efforts to remove graffiti.

Norman Masson, Resident, commented on a loud house party, noise restriction hours as indicated on the City’s ordinance and the information he received from the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) when he reported the loud party.

Deena Sopko, Resident, commented on campaign flyers and the City Council pay increase.

Randall Abram, Resident, commented on public comments made at the September 16, 2024, City Council meeting against the City Manager and on campaign flyers.

Annette Bowens, Resident, thanked Mayor Pullen-Miles and Councilmember Hofmann Gorman for their support against the Metro C Line (Green) Project, and commented in disapproval of the tension among the DRAFT
City Councilmembers.

Pam London, Former Resident, provided a public comment via e-mail about dog licensing, code enforcement matters and disapproval of campaign strategies by candidates.

E. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
Councilmember Cuevas thanked everyone that attended tonight’s meeting.

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman thanked everyone that made a public comment at tonight’s meeting.

Councilmember Kearney thanked everyone that made a public comment at tonight’s meeting, thanked Resident Harbison for his positive remarks about the Halloween Haunt event, and asked staff to speak with Resident Masson about the loud party.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez thanked everyone that attended tonight’s meeting.

Mayor Pullen-Miles thanked Resident Harbison for recognizing staff’s efforts on the Halloween Haunt event, graffiti removal, Southwest Patrol and thanked everyone for voicing their concerns.

City Clerk Harbison announced that in-person voting for the General Municipal Election is available tomorrow at Jane Addams Middle School from 7:00 am to 5:00 p.m., located at 4535 W 153rd Place, Lawndale, CA and an official ballot drop-off box is located at Hogan Park, located 16605 Osage Avenue, Lawndale, CA.

Mayor Pullen-Miles asked staff to find out details about the noise ordinance and effective hours.

Councilmember Kearney commented that only street parking is available during the day when visiting Jane Addams Middle School to vote.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR

3. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda -Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

4. Accounts Payable Register
-Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. CC-2411-102 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $412,825.63.

5. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting, October 21, 2024 -Recommendation: that City Council approve the minutes.

G. ADMINISTRATION

6. City Council Meeting Dates for Calendar Year 2025
-Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Cancel the scheduled City Council meetings on January 20, 2025; February 17, 2025; and September 1, 2025, due to the City observed holidays; or 2.) Cancel the scheduled City Council meetings on January 20, 2025; February 17, 2025; and September 1, 2025; and reschedule all meetings to the next day on January 21, 2025; February 18, 2025; and September 2, 2025; or 3.) Provide the City Manager and staff with alternative direction.

Assistant City Clerk Palomo presented the staff report.

Minutes - City Council
November 4, 2024

Page 2 ends

DRAFT
Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers on whether the meetings should be cancelled or rescheduled to the following day.

By consensus, the City Council canceled the scheduled City Council meetings on January 20, 2025, February 17, 2025, and September 1, 2025; and rescheduled all meetings to the next day on January 21, 2025; February 18, 2025; and September 2, 2025.

7. Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2024 -Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2024.

Finance Director Manuelian presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers about the long-term interest in fixed rates on bond investments, and how the City is affected when rates drop.

A motion was made by Councilmember Kearney and seconded by Councilmember Cuevas to the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.

8. Authorization to Allow Residents to Bid on City's Used Furniture, Donate Used Furniture to Charity, and Discard Remaining Used Furniture
-Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Authorize City staff to prepare a plan that will allow residents of the City of Lawndale to pick up used furniture from the City Maintenance Yard; 2.) Approve the donation of used furniture to Habitat for Humanity after City residents are given the opportunity to bid on it; and 3.) Approve discarding the used furniture pieces that are not selected by the public or Habitat for Humanity, through Republic Services.

Public Works Director Rodriguez presented the staff report.

Discussion ensued among City Councilmembers about the best options.

By consensus, the City Council authorizes City staff to prepare a plan that will allow residents of the City of Lawndale to pick up used furniture from the City Maintenance Yard, approves the donation of used furniture to Habitat for Humanity after City residents are given the opportunity to bid on it, and approves discarding the used furniture pieces that are not selected by the public or Habitat for Humanity, through Republic Services.

H. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Moore had no items to report.

I. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

9. Update on Clean Up Week Incentivizing Public Participation -Requested by Councilmember Cuevas.

Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file this staff report.

Municipal Services Director Reyes presented the staff report.

Councilmember Cuevas thanked staff for their efforts to increase public participation in City events and provided additional food vendor ideas.

Councilmember Kearney asked if City Councilmembers can use their discretionary funds to purchase gift certificates from restaurants to give to participants.

Minutes - City Council
November 4, 2024

Page 3 ends

DRAFT
City Attorney Murphy responded that he would research whether discretionary funds could be used for gift certificates.

Mayor Pullen-Miles asked if contests can be created to encourage participation.

Municipal Services Director Reyes responded that staff would explore the ideas.

By consensus, the City Council received and filed the staff report.

10. Mayor/City Councilmembers Report of Attendance at Meetings and/or Events Councilmember Cuevas attended the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) South Bay Regional Roundtable on Climate Resiliency via Zoom, the City’s Halloween Haunt event, March Forward Inglewood Women's Rights March, and the 1 Annual ESMoA Day of the Dead Festival.

Councilmember Hofmann Gorman attended the City’s Halloween Haunt event, thanked the Community Services Department, Public Works and LASD for making the event possible, congratulated the Dodgers for winning the 2024 World Series, and thanked the residents that celebrated responsibly. Councilmember Hofmann Gorman announced the City’s 9 Annual Field of Honor event and sale of flags, the next Neighborhood Watch meeting scheduled for November 20, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. at the Harold E. Hofmann Community Center, and requested an annual update of code enforcement cases.

City Attorney Murphy responded that the report would be provided.

Councilmember Kearney attended the Seniors Halloween Themed Lunch, the City’s Halloween Haunt event, 1 Annual ESMoA Day of the Dead Festival, and announced that the month of November is designated as National Native American Heritage Month.

Mayor Pro Tem Suarez attended SBCCOG Board of Directors meeting, SBCCOG - Redondo Beach Functional Zero Celebration, requested that a Homeless Solutions Standing Committee meeting be scheduled, and commented that SBCCOG voted no on Measure M Inglewood Transit Connector Project and asked what Southwest Patrol's responsibilities are.

City Manager Moore and Municipal Services Director responded that Southwest Patrol's responsibilities include reporting graffiti and illegal activities to LASD.

Mayor Pullen-Miles attended the City’s Halloween Haunt event, the 1 Annual ESMoA Day of the Dead Festival, Lucille Smith Elementary School Halloween Parade, Seniors Halloween Themed Lunch, and thanked Community Services staff and Public Works staff for their efforts on the City’s Halloween Haunt event.

J. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, Mayor Pullen-Miles adjourned the meeting at 7:33 p.m.

Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:

Erica Harbison, City Clerk
Approved: 11/18/2024
st
th
st
st
Minutes - City Council
November 4, 2024

Page 4 ends

DRAFT

BACKGROUND
On November 5, 2024, the City of Lawndale General Municipal Election was conducted by the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's Office (RR/CC) for the purpose of electing a Mayor and two members of the City Council.

The Vote by Mail (VBM) period started on October 7, 2024, and every registered voter in Los Angeles County received a vote by mail ballot. A vote by mail drop box was located at the entrance of Hogan Park.

One vote center in the City was available for early voting beginning four days prior to election day at Jane Addams Middle School Vote Center.

As of November 8, 2024, the City of Lawndale has 16,432 Registered Voters.

STAFF REVIEW
As of November 13, 2024, the unofficial results are as follows:

Mayor, Vote for One
Wanza Tolliver 675 8.00%
Robert Pullen-Miles 5,057 59.97%
Bernadette Lourdes Suarez 2,701 32.03%
Write-Ins* --
Total Ballots Cast 6,231
*No Write-In Candidate information is available as of the writing of this report.

City Council Member, Vote for Two
Francisco M. Talavera 3,594 33.20%
Rhonda Hofmann Gorman 3,472 32.07%
Sirley Cuevas 3,759 34.73%
Write-Ins* --
Total Ballots Cast 6,231
*No Write-In Candidate information is available as of the writing of this report.

As of November 13, 2024, the RR/CC still had approximately 120,400 outstanding ballots to be processed Countywide. These outstanding ballots consist of Vote by Mail, Conditional Voter Registration ballots and Provisional ballots.

On December 5, 2024, the RR/CC is scheduled to certify the election results and declare the election officially concluded.

The official election results will be brought forth at the December 16, 2024, City Council meeting.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this report.

Award of Construction Services to Mariposa Landscapes Inc. for the City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project

BACKGROUND
The irrigation systems at Rogers-Anderson Park, Jane Addams Park, and William Green Park frequently break and require repairs due to aging infrastructure. Upgrading the irrigation system is essential to reduce these disruptions and implement sustainable water management practices that will benefit the community.

The City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project create efficient irrigation systems for these parks. The scope of work for Rogers–Anderson Park is the installation of a complete new irrigation system, and for Jane Addams Park and William Green Park the scope of work covers replacing the sprinkler heads and irrigation valves throughout the parks.

STAFF REVIEW
The Request for Proposals (RFP) for the project was advertised on August 14, 2024 on the City’s website, through several trade journals, and in the Daily Breeze news paper (Attachment E). Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., San Diego Landsystems, LLc., Bennett Enterprises, and Inland Empire Landscape, Inc. were the companies that attended the job walks and submitted proposals, which were opened on Wednesday, October 16, 2024 by the City Clerk’s office staff in accordance with the City bidding procedures (Attachment A).

The proposals received are listed in the table below arranged by bid amount.

Bidder Name Bid Amount
San Diego Landsystems, LLC. $573,449.60
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. $797,716.77
Bennett Enterprises $826,540.00
Inland Empire Landscape, Inc. $869,898.00
A team of staff members reviewed all the proposals according to the criteria in the RFP rating system comprised of ten (10) categories scored at ten (10) points maximum each. The categories reviewed are as follows:
1) Attended Site Visit;
2) Completeness of RFP Response;
3) Experience with Proposed Equipment;
4) Knowledge and Expertise of Company;
5) Prior Relevant Experience;
6) Total Project Cost;
7) Training Elements, and
8) Proposed Project Timeline.

Following the evaluation of proposals, the ranking is shown in the table below:

Company Mariposa
Landscapes,
Inc.

Inland Empire
Landscape, Inc.

Bennett
Enterprises
San Diego
Landsystems,
LLC.

Total Score:

Staff 1
79 70 59 43
Total Score:

Staff 2
73 59 58 55
Total Score:

Staff 3
57 59 48 55
Average: 69.7 62.7 55 51
Staff reviewed the proposal from Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. (Mariposa), located in Irwindale, California, and determined that they submitted the most responsible and responsive proposal for the project, with a bid of $797,716.77 (Attachment B). Due to Mariposa not being the lowest bid, staff took into consideration the lowest bidder’s proposal, San Diego Landsystems, LLC., and found them non-responsive for not having previous experience with public agencies, providing references only for private work, in addition to not having responded to all the requirements in the RFP, resulting in an incomplete proposal that did not meet the City’s requirements.

Construction is expected to begin within the next two months and will last up to 4 months due to the need to construct the project in phases due to schools being in session and having sports activities after school and evenings. Construction management and inspection for the project will be done by City staff.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City attorney reviewed this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of this project including materials and construction is $797,716.77. Funding for this project is already allocated in the current FY2024-25 budget in the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) fund as this is considered to be general government services.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council award a construction services in the amount of $797,716.77 to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., for the City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project.

Attachments
ATTACHMENT A -Bid Opening Log
ATTACHMENT B Mariposa Proposal
ATTACHMENT C - Draft Agreement
ATTACHMENT D - All Proposals

ATTACHMENT E - RFP

ATTACHMENT A

ATTACHMENT B

ATTACHMENT C

CONTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Mariposa Landscapes Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor,”
WITNESSETH: That the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:

ARTICLE I: For and in consideration of the payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by said City, said Contractor agrees with said City to construct the work under the City's Request for Proposals entitled “City Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project” and to perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner all the work pertaining thereto shown on the Request for Proposal herein, to furnish at his own proper cost and expense all designs, drawings, specifications, tools, equipment, labor, and materials necessary therefor, except such material and equipment as in said document as expressly stipulated to be furnished by said City, and to do everything required by this Agreement and the said document.

ARTICLE II: For furnishing all said designs, drawings, specifications, materials and labor, furnishing and removing all plant, temporary works or structures, tools and equipment and doing all the work contemplated and embraced in this Agreement, also for all loss and damage arising out of the nature of the work aforesaid, or from the action of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties which may arise from or be encountered in the prosecution of the work until its acceptance by said City, and for all risks of every description connected with the work; also for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of work, except such as in the said specifications are expressly stipulated to be borne by said City, and for well and faithfully completing the work the whole thereof, in the manner shown and described in said document and in accordance with the requirements of the Engineer, said City will pay and said Contractor shall receive in full compensation therefor the prices named in the Bidding Schedule of the Proposal hereto attached.

ARTICLE III: City agrees to pay and Contractor agrees to accept in full payment for this Work or Improvement the stipulated sum of Seven Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Sixteen and 77/100 Dollars ($797,716.77).

City agrees to make monthly payments and final payment in accordance with the method set forth in the document.

ARTICLE IV: All work to be done under this contract shall be completed within ONE HUNDRED (100) consecutive working days, exclusive of maintenance periods, beginning on the date stipulated in the written Notice to Proceed issued by the Engineer. Any changes in time and/or price are to be submitted to the City Engineer, in writing, within 2 days of the occurrence giving rise to the request and shall request a formal decision from the City within 10 days and shall include data supporting the request.

ARTICLE V: Time is of the essence with respect to the performance by Contractor of its duties.

Failure of the Contractor to complete the work within the time allowed will result in damages being sustained by the City. Such damages are, and will continue to be, impracticable and extremely difficult to determine. For each consecutive calendar day, or portion thereof, in excess of the time specified for completion of the work (as adjusted), the Contractor shall pay to the City, or the City may deduct from any payments due or to become due to Contractor, the sum of $1,000.00 per day.

Execution of this Agreement shall constitute agreement by the City and the Contractor that the specified liquidated damages per day is the minimum value of the costs and actual damage caused by the failure of the Contractor to complete the work within the allotted time, that such is liquidated damages and shall not be construed as a penalty, and that such sum may be deducted from payments due the Contractor if such delay occurs.

ARTICLE VI: The City hereby promises and agrees with said Contractor to employ, and does hereby employ, said Contractor to provide the materials and to do the work according to the terms and conditions herein contained and referred to for the price aforesaid, and hereby contracts to pay for the same, at the time, in the manner, and upon the conditions set forth in said specifications; and the said parties for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein contained.

ARTICLE VII: The Request for Proposals, all addenda issued prior to the opening of the proposals by the City, all contract change orders issued after execution of the Contract Agreement, , Faithful Performance Bond, Payment Bond, all of which are essential parts of this contract, are hereby incorporated in and made part of this Agreement.

ARTICLE VIII: Contractor acknowledges and agrees to comply with the provisions of the State Labor Code requiring every employer to pay at least the minimum prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract. State general prevailing wage determination as established by the California Department of Industrial Relations (available at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm). The statutory provisions for penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages and/or failure to otherwise comply with state's wage and hour laws will be enforced.

The applicable prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the City of Lawndale Department of Public Works, 4722 Manhattan Beach Blvd., Lawndale, California 90260, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contractor is required to post at the job site the prevailing wage rate of per diem wages and other notices prescribed by regulation.

ARTICLE IX: The Contractor shall supply the City with certificates of insurance for the types and amounts of insurance required for this project as described in the Request for Proposals for this project. Said certificates must comply with all requirements for sufficient insurance as described in the Request for Proposals.

ARTICLE X: The Contractor hereby agrees that the Contactor and any subcontractor under him submit weekly to the DIR directly and provide copy to City, certified copies of the payroll records for all said workers and shall comply with all statutory requirements relating to certified copies of payroll records, including the maintenance of the records, their certification, and their availability for inspection as required by Labor Code Section 1776 and as required under Subsection 7-2.6 of said Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. In addition, the Contractor and any subcontractors must furnish electronic certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner (aka Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) in a format prescribed by the Labor Commissioner no less than monthly as follows:

The applicable prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the City of Lawndale Department of Public Works, 4722 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90266, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contractor is required to post at the job site the prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations and other notices prescribed by regulation.

ARTICLE XI: Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5, Contractor and any subcontractor must be registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations prior to performing any work under this Agreement. Further, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

ARTICLE XII: Contractor shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by City, and hold harmless City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable legal counsel fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Should conflict of interest principles preclude a single legal counsel from representing both City and Contractor, or should City otherwise find Contractor’s legal counsel unacceptable, then Contractor shall reimburse the City its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable legal counsels fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The Contractor shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the Contractor’s negligent, reckless or wrongful performance. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

Contractor obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense, judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contractor will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City.

ARTICLE XIII: Contractor’s services are being provided to the City as that of an independent contractor. Contractor represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to the City pursuant to this Agreement are classified by the Contractor as employees. In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) to be classified as other than an independent contractor to the City, then Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgements, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to the City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Contractor or any persons Contractor used to provide services under this Agreement are employees of the City.

ARTICLE XIV: The City, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300, shall permit the substitution of securities for any moneys withheld by the City to secure performance under a contract. The City hereby incorporates herein all of the provisions set forth in Public Contract Code Section 22300.

ARTICLE XV: In the performance of this agreement, the Contractor shall not engage in, nor permit others he may hire to engage in, discrimination in the employment of persons because of their race, religious creed, color, or national origin, except as provided in Government Code Section 12940. Violation of this provision may result in the imposition of penalties as provided in Labor Code Section 1735.

ARTICLE XVI: It is to be made known that the improvement contemplated in the performance of this contract may require by the State of California shall exercise general supervision; the State of California, therefore, shall have the right to assume full and direct control over this contract whenever the State of California, at its sole discretion, shall determine that its responsibility to the United States so requires.

ARTICLE XVII: The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to the contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by the City to assure proper accounting for all project funds, both federal and non-federal shares. These records will be made available for audit purposes to the City or any authorized representative and will be retained for 3 years after the expiration of this contract, unless permission to destroy them is granted by the City.

ARTICLE XVIII: No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation.

Similarly, Contractor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

ARTICLE XIX: The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound.

ARTICLE XX: Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contractor agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.

CITY: CITY OF LAWNDALE,

CALIFORNIA
Dated ________________, 20__ By:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
Approved as to form:
_______________________________

CITY ATTORNEY
Dated ________________, 20__ CONTRACTOR: ___________________ By:

Terry Noriega

PRESIDENT
By:

Antonio Valenzuela

SECRETARY

ATTACHMENT D
Mariposa Landscapes,
Inc.

Sand Diego
Landsystems, LLC

Inland Empire
Landscape, Inc.

Bennett Enterprises

ATTACHMENT E
1 CITY OF LAWNDALE

CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

FOR THE

JOINT CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

ASSESSMENT, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

BID OPENING: September 16, 2024, AT 10:00 A.M.

Public Works Department
4722 Manhattan Beach Boulevard
Lawndale, California 90260
Phone: (310) 973-3260 / Fax: (310) 371-8877
2 CITY OF LAWNDALE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE JOINT CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS

IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION

PROJECT

1. PROJECT OVERVIEW
Introduction:

Notice is hereby given that the City of Lawndale, California (City) is soliciting Requests for Proposals (RFPs) from qualified contractors for the assessment, design, implementation, and training of a fully functioning landscape irrigation system in accordance with the needs of the City for the following City-owned facility in the City of Lawndale:

A. Rogers-Anderson Park (4161 Manhattan Beach Blvd, Lawndale, CA 90260) B. Jane Addams Park (15114 Firmona Ave, Lawndale, CA 90260) C. William Green Park (4558 W 168th St, Lawndale, CA 90260) The goal of this RFP is to secure the services of a qualified contractor who will assess, design, and install a landscape irrigation system that will allow the most water-efficient way to irrigate many different plantings in the park.

Background:

Rogers-Anderson Park currently has an existing irrigation system that is failing and requires constant maintenance. However, the proposed system will need a new design layout to effectively meet the park's needs. Jane Addams Park and William Green Park require periodic maintenance. Both sites must undergo a comprehensive assessment to determine their specific requirements for an effective irrigation system.

2. SCOPE OF WORK:

The scope of the project includes assessing, designing, and installing a fully operational landscape irrigation system.

The selected contractor will recommend the type and number of pipes, backflow preventers, heads, valves, etc. needed within each zone as well as potential replacement of existing irrigation system to allow full coverage.

The selected contractor will make recommendations for additional equipment needed to improve the efficacy at each zone location.

The irrigation system shall include the following elements and features, but not be limited to:

A.Rain Bird ESP-LXME Modular Controller
B.Rain Bird Power Wires
C.Rain Bird Common Wires
3 D.Rain Bird Valves
E. Rain Bird Sprinklers
F. Rain Bird Master Valve
G.Rain Bird Flow Sensor
H.FEBCO Check Valve
I. New Main Lines

3. PRE-PROPOSAL SITE VISIT AND JOB WALK:

A mandatory site visit will be held on Tuesday, August 27, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. beginning at RogersAnderson Park (4161 Manhattan Beach Blvd, Lawndale, CA 90260). Potential proposers will be provided an opportunity to tour the applicable facilities with City staff and ask questions pertaining to the designated project location or the project itself.

Potential proposers and City staff will remain at each facility until all potential proposers have had an opportunity to ask questions and get a solid grasp of the challenges presented at the facility.

RSVP and attendance is mandatory; it is strongly recommended that all potential proposers attend the site/job walk to understand the scope of the project.

Please direct any questions pertaining to the site visit/job walk to Nabi Sidiqi, Assistant Engineer at (310) 973-3261, or via email to [email protected].

4. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION VIA US MAIL, EMAIL, OR PHYSICAL DROP-OFF:

Proposals are due on or before Monday, September 16, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Completed proposals can be submitted in two methods: 1) US Mail or 2) Physical Drop-off at the City Clerk’s Office located inside of City Hall. All RFP response materials must be provided to the Lawndale City Clerk’s Office located inside Lawndale City Hall.

Proposers shall submit one (1) original unbound master copy of the proposal to the City Clerk’s Office at or before the deadline referred to above.

City of Lawndale
Attention: City Clerk’s Office
Joint City/School District Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA. 90260
[email protected]
[email protected]
Proposals that arrive to the City after the proposal submission deadline, will not be included in the City’s review process. In addition, proposal modifications will not be accepted after the RFP closing date and time.

Please note that the City’s administrative offices are closed on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and City-observed holidays. Please plan accordingly if you are hand delivering your proposal response as 4 physical drop-off opportunities will not be available on Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and City-observed holidays.

5. PROPOSAL CONTENTS
A. Cover Letter:

The cover letter must include the following elements: 1) company name; 2) primary contact and position held within the company; 3) alternate contact and position held within the company; 4) company mailing address; 5) primary telephone contact, alternate telephone contact and company telephone number(s); 6) primary, alternate and company contact email address(es); and 7) a statement confirming the company’s desire to enter into a contract with the City for the Joint City/School District Parks Irrigation Systems Assessment, Design and Implementation Project.

The cover letter must be on a company letterhead and signed by a representative authorized to represent the firm and to execute a contract with the City. Said individual must also be identified by their position(s) held within said company.

B. List of Sub-contractors Being Used:

Proposal contents must include a list of any sub-contractors the selected proposer plans on engaging for this project.

C. Itemized List of Costs:

The project contents shall also include an itemized list of all costs and fees associated with the project to include: cost of material, labor costs (see note below), warranties, and miscellaneous costs which are difficult to categorize. This is not an exhaustive list and proposers are expected to include itemized costs for elements that are not on the above list that will give the City the best possible project that budget will allow.

Note: The City is required to pay prevailing wages; therefore, all labor costs must be itemized for the projected number of hours for each phase of the project and quoted consistent with the current prevailing wages in Los Angeles County. Proposers quoting labor costs not representative of prevailing wages be will disqualified from the City’s review process.

D. Post Project Costs:

Please include a list of itemized and ongoing costs associated with the system on a year-by-year basis for two years after completion of the project.

E. Generic Project Schedule:

Proposal contents shall also include a realistic project timeline itemizing the different phases of the project and approximate length of time to complete each phase. The timeline shall include specific dates and must detail the activities within each project phase from start to finish which meets the project completion timeline referenced in Section 14, Proposal and Project Timeline. The City will negotiate a project start date with the selected proposer once a contractor has been selected by the City. The City will also be open to negotiating a project completion date, if necessary, to compensate for unexpected delays outside of the City or selected contractor’s control. 5 F. System Training After Project Completion:

Proposal contents must include itemized details and costs as it relates to system training, such as who will provide training, the costs of such training, what areas of training will be provided and the number of people to be trained to functionally operate the system.

H. Supplemental Information:

Proposers are welcome to submit any supplemental information which could be considered helpful to the City in evaluating its proposal. This is not required; however, allows an opportunity for the proposing entity to present additional information that said contractor would like the City to consider when proposals are evaluated. Supplemental information must be labeled “Supplemental Information” so it is not confused with other required proposal information.

I. References:

Please provide a minimum of four (4) business references, or clients, your company has contracted with in the past two (2) years involving similar services. References for projects that did not involve similar services will not be counted as a legitimate reference. References will only be checked for the proposal that is most desirable to the City. References will only count if the contractor chosen by the City completed the project being referenced. Please provide the following information for each reference:
 Organization Name;
 Contract Representative Name;
 Address, City and State, Zip Code;
 Telephone Number(s);
 Email Addresses;
 Project Start Date;
 Project Completion Date; and
 Types of Services Provided
J. Required Insurances:

Please provide a redacted photocopy of your company’s existing General Liability, Auto Liability and Worker’s Compensation documentation for any current contracts held by your company for amounts equal to or above the requirements set forth in Exhibit A, Section 5, Insurance and Indemnification.

Insurance documentation must be valid at the time the proposal is due and does not have to be specifically tailored to the City of Lawndale at the time of submitting said proposal. Once the City selects a contractor for the job, the City will work with the selected proposer to ensure that all insurance documentation is written according to the City’s requirements. Proposers that cannot provide evidence of current Commercial General Liability, Commercial Auto Liability and Worker’s Compensation will be disqualified from the City’s review process.

6. LICENSES, INSURANCE AND LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS:

Licenses:

The selected proposer shall hold, and provide copies upon request by the City, of valid permits, licenses, certificates and other documents as required by the Federal, State, County, City and other governmental or regulatory bodies to legally engage in the services to be provided. 6 The selected proposer must notify the City immediately of any suspension, termination, lapse, non-renewals or restriction of required licenses, certificates, or other documents which may be cause for immediate termination of the Agreement.

City Business License:

The selected proposer shall obtain a City of Lawndale business license from the Finance Department before the commencement of services. In addition, the selected proposer shall be required to pay all other required license and permit fees related to doing business with the City, if applicable.

Insurance and Indemnification:

The types and amounts of insurance and indemnification required of the selected proposer are set forth in Exhibit 1, Section 5, pages 4 and 5 of the sample Contract Services Agreement. All certificates and endorsements shall name the City of Lawndale and its officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds.

All insurance documentation required in Exhibit 1, Section 5, Insurance and Indemnification must be provided as attachments to the proposal response as mentioned in Proposal Contents, Section 5, Required Insurance. All insurance documentation required as attachments to the proposal shall be in redacted form (no visible customer or client information).

7. SELECTION PROCESS
Each proposal will be judged on its own merit using a defined point system as referenced in Section 13, Proposal Evaluation Criteria.

8. CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL
All requested information must be provided. Failure to submit a fully complete proposal may result in disqualification from the proposal evaluation process or reduced number of points in said category.

9. PROPOSAL FORMAT
Each proposal submitted must include one (1) master copy and shall be provided to the City on or before the deadline to submit as mentioned in Section 4, Proposal Submission via US Mail, Email or Physical Drop-Off.

10. PROPOSAL DEADLINE:

Proposals must be received in a sealed envelope if mailed, or physically hand delivered to the City at the address in Section 4, Proposal Submission via US Mail or Physical Drop Off no later than Monday, September 16, 2024, 10:00 a.m.

Proposals received by the City, whether via US mail or physical drop-off to the City Clerk’s Office will not be reviewed by the City if received after the deadline mentioned above. Post marked proposals arriving after the above-mentioned deadline will not be reviewed by the City. Proposal modifications will not be reviewed by the City if received after the above-mentioned submission deadline.

Incomplete or late submittals are cause for disqualification form the City’s review process.

11. RFP QUESTIONS:

Any questions regarding this RFP, its content or procedural matters should be submitted via email no later than Monday, September 9, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. to the individual referenced below. Questions can be sent via US mail; however, the City encourages proposers to submit questions via email for the quickest possible turnaround time. An addendum responding to all questions submitted on or before 7 the deadline will be provided to all proposers on the distribution list as mentioned in Section 15, Proposal and Project Timeline.

Lawndale Public Works Department
Attention: Nabi Sidiqi
Assistant Engineer
Email: [email protected]

12. PROPOSAL ADDENDUM AND CITY RESPONSES:

All questions submitted to the City regarding this RFP will be responded to no later than Wednesday, September 11, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. Responses from the City will be emailed to all individuals on the distribution list. Individuals submitting questions who are not on the distribution list, but from a company on the distribution list, will be added to the list upon submission of related questions. The City is not obligated to respond to questions submitted after Monday, September 9, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

13. PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA:

A City evaluation team will review each proposal submitted on or before the deadline and select the most qualified proposer based on a maximum 100 point rating system. During the review process, the City reserves the right to request additional information or ask clarifying questions from those who have submitted a proposal response. However, the City cannot allow corrections to any proposal after the submission deadline has passed.

14. CONTRACT AWARD CRITERIA:

Contract award will be based on a 1 00-point maximum point system. After proposals are evaluated, the City reserves the right to further negotiate the proposed work and/or compensation amounts with the contractor that has been chosen for the eventual contract.

Points Based Evaluation System:

Proposals will be rated on a categorical rating system comprised of ten (10) categories weighted at ten (10) points each for a total of 100 points maximum. The categories being weighted are as follows:
1) Attended Site Visit;
2) Completeness of RFP Response;
3) Experience with Proposed Equipment;
4) Knowledge and Expertise of Company;
5) Prior Relevant Experience;
6) Total Project Cost;
7) Training Elements; and
8) Proposed Project Timeline
The proposal obtaining the most points as determined by the City’s evaluation team, will be considered for the job award after references are checked. In the case in which there is a tie for the most points by two or more proposers, the City will conduct in-person interviews to determine which proposer will be awarded the contract for the project.
8 15. PROPOSAL AND PROJECT TIMELINE:
(Dates may fluctuate based upon unexpected circumstances):
 Distribution of RFP:

Wednesday, August 14, 2024
 Site Visit and Job Walk:

Tuesday, August 27, 2024
 Deadline for Submitting Questions:

Monday, September 9, 2024
 City Response to Questions and Addendum Distribution:

Wednesday, September 11, 2024
 Proposals Due:

Monday, September 16, 2024, 10:00 a.m.
 Proposal Review Period:

Tuesday, September 17, 2024 – Wednesday, September 18, 2024  Contractor Selection:

Monday, September 23, 2024
 Contract Formation:

Tuesday, September 24, 2024
 Contract Approval:

Monday, October 7, 2024
 Notice to Proceed:

Wednesday, October 16, 2024
 Project Kickoff Date:

To be negotiated by the City and selected contractor
 Project Completion Date:

January 31, 2025 (Approximate)
The City staff will do their best to stay consistent with the above Proposal and Project Timeline; however, the City reserves the right to adjust the timeline to accommodate for any delays, funding deadlines, or any other factors related to this project.

16. RIGHT TO REJECT PROPOSALS:

The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and rebid the project by issuing a subsequent RFP, or the City may waive any irregularities or informalities in any proposal or in the proposal process should it deem this necessary for the public good.

The City also reserves the right to reject the proposal of any contractor that has been delinquent or unfaithful in any former contract with the City or another agency at which a contract was defaulted.

17. FROZEN PROPOSAL:

No proposer who submitted a proposal on or before the deadline may withdraw its proposal for a period of sixty (60) days after the date from the opening thereof.

18. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

By submitting a proposal, the proposer certifies that he or she will comply with all applicable Federal, State and City laws and requirements.
9 19. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION:

The proposals, after received by the City, shall become the property of the City of Lawndale and are subject to public disclosure under the California Public Records Act.

20. CONTRACTOR SELECTION:

All proposers will be notified of the results of the RFP selection process in writing once a contractor has been selected by the City and before the award of the contract. If the selected contractor cannot continue with the job for any reason, the City reserves the right to select the proposer with the next highest point total, or issue a subsequent RFP and start the process over.

21. COMMENTS ON THE CITY’S STANDARD AGREEMENT
Proposers who desire to comment on the standard contract template provided in Exhibit A, may do so. Any requested revisions to the Contract Services Agreement must be stated on a separate sheet of paper titled “Comments on the City’s Standard Agreement” with each request item being fully described as to why the applicable language is suggested for revision and/or elimination.

As well, proposers may request that certain language be added to the agreement; however, must explain grounds for such additions to the Agreement. Such additions and/or removal of language from the City’s standard agreement will be at the sole discretion of the City. Please note that standard template language, in most cases, cannot be changed by the City.

22. SPECIAL PROVISIONS – LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS:

Contents:

Section 26-00-00 Electrical
Section 32-90-00 Irrigation
Section 32-90-00 Planting

!! ""#$%&'(""
)*"+#

'
'
("
,$
("

("-
./#

+
()
-)

&$
'
$(0
'$

&'(1
20$
&-

!

!!

&
'

,
'
&
*"(&(-&*

(

&
'(
(
)*"

(-#$%(3"

("
&
(""(

3
*$1
-
-,$
'

40 *)

-
&
$
3 -$&'#(&3

'
&

$(

!6$1
-
"(3$(-
"&

&&($+(-
&
(""(**($(
0&7)(

$
("&7(-

40 *)

(,(&'

)*"+
5#

'(""(**"

(3"

-
&7

"0-
5

)&$
40 $
-
30

&&($
"+&'#7&0
'(&"()*&7
0*"
5&7'(5
$&73$(
%

&7
"()*&7
38
&7

$&7(-'($-#($
!

!9! 8()

(""

$(

-
0)

&(-1
$
,+(""-
)
&
&(-
-

&7&0
'(&

&73
()&7,0$$
57-$&#
5&7-0

&7*
*
&7

"
5&(-3$
5(+
-
&
$
*(

&

'
(

,
'
5

$("

$(

$*$
$

))

5(+#$%!
#

'
&7

$"&7(

&&-$&
"

("
40 *)

7&'(""3

&
(""
-&(&

3 $
(-
"+(

&&
3"
,$*
$(

57&
$1

57)(

(

5(-$
*(
$
5!

!:!
,
$
)

("-$(#
5&7
,(+7(-
'
$)(0,(

0$
$;&
,$)(

#
$
5
-
(5$()&,$

)&(--
1 &
3
,0$
&'
-7
&
(""
-(-<$

-3+

("

$(

$,$(
)*"

(-*
$(3"
'
(

571

5(-(
$

5&+&

)(-
'
$
40 *)

!=
$
,+
8(

"
(

,
40 *)

(-

-0

$)
(

(

40 *)

#

("7*"0)3
5(-)(0,(

0$
&&03

$!6$1
-

-0

&(-20

38
&,$

$"#
$
5(-
'
$)&
(
&(-

'
$

$"-
1 &!'

$(

$&'(""
8 -#
$
5,$)"
("-
&

'
&
("")
$&!

!>! '

"

("-$(#
5&($
-
(5$())(

(
0$
(-
-

(

'
"
(

,0
"

&
(-
40 *)

(-
'

$
0 ($$(5
)

,
'
$
40 $
-#
$
57(-
'05'

&&($
"+
-

(

5
'
(

0("$0

&,
-0

&7
'
-$(#
5&&'(""3
,""#
-(&

"&
"+(&*$*
$
$-
(

'
'
#$%,
'
$
$(-
&(-&*(

#
""*
$)

)*"
,+
&
(""(

#'
$
1 $*&&
3"
30
&032

(**$1(",
'

5

$,$
1 &0("(-&
$0

0$("$
(&&!

&
#

'

'
&
*
,
'
-$(#
5&
&'#

&&($+,,&

&73
-&7*0""38
&(-3&
$0

&!'
-$(#
5&($

-
-

3
&
("
-(-
'

"

("

$(

$&'(""$
,
$

'
($
'

0$("
&
$0

-$(#
5&,$-
)
&
&!

!! 8(

"
(

,
40 *)

(-0
"

&&'(""3
1
$
,
-
,
"-!$-
(

&
(""(

,
"

("&+&

'
'(
,(""
'
$
$(-
&!6$
$

)*"

,
(,,

-#$%7
"

("

$(

$&'(""
&
$0

+
'
0&
(-)(

(

,
'

"

("&+&

)!
$(

$&'(""

"0-
(""
'

"

("
40 *)

7"
5'

"0)
(
$
&
3
$
"
(

'
,

$(-
0&3
''$
?
("(-1
$

(",$)#'
$

'
-
1 &($
&'#
'
-$(#
5&!

#

#

!
$%

&
$

$

&%

'

(
%
"

" )

$

*

%
$

%

#
"

%

+

&

%

"

&
$

$(

$
'

(
"

, %

% -)
%

+
"

(
)
#

(

%

%

"

$(
%
(

(
%

%

$

#
( #

"

"
(&+!
%

!""

-
$!
#
)
$!"

(
%

&+
%

%

&(
%
%
$%

)!
%

%
%
(

""# (
%

)

%

&
%

%

&

1

234
5

(

)""#

$$

)6

%

(&%

%
%
)

$
""#

%
3

$
%
"#

%

%
"#

"
(

0 %"&
$
5"7

%
"#

%

)(
#
&""#

$
!

(

(
"

(

%

)&

""# (
%

)
$

#
!

)
%

"7

%
"

(
&

%

$
(
$
%("7

(
'

!
%

$!
!
%

)&

%
"
&

""# )
%

&
'

$284&+
$)
"

5
(

""#
(

&

"#

)
%

)

(
'

!
%

(

%
%
"

()

%

$
"

$%

%

)&

%"
&

""# )
%

&
'

$24&+
$)
"

5

(

""#
(

&

"#

"#
!$

%!
&''
%

(%

!

!
%
!"'

!%
&$

&%

))*

+

,+

!

&

!

'

!!
"
&

!
!

%
!
%$

))-

'

%

!
&+

%$%

"#$
+
!

$

%

%$%

'$

%

!
&+

!

.

"#
&!

)

!
'

))

"#
'$
!
!$

!'

!'

/)0

'$

!

&'
1 %

!'
"/0

345678946:5;4<=
) !%

&
21

>

?
!%

$
"

*
!@-A

BC
!%

$
"

*)
!@

(%
!

&
'

$
"

@

DE

&
'$

$
"

?EB)
!@F)GB

$
"

? )
!@F)G

E

!,%

$
"

? )

CE
1

!
!

!
'

!
EHA

II
&

2 %

$
"

)
!))

!%

!
$
"

?JA2 -FF*

!""

#
!#$!
%

'
(
)

*+

,-
#
.+!
'/

/&/0&"
)

!""1

#
%

%

#!

',-
#
"
#
#&

.+!
'!#/!""
!#
!#
#

0.2!
'!#"!'

3 4&#
'
$#
'5

/)

'&#
'
$#
'1

/%!""
/)"1

%6,7!#
7

""
#&

$

))

&"!

# -

%"
#
#&

/)"1
'

% 83!#
!#
#
#&

/)"1
'

% 82

%!""$
"

#!#"!$
"
#$1!!

)
!$"

%

!&
%

%!-
'9&
#

!))"

%&
#

'%

'
"
'%

'

"5

6&
%!#

!"""
'%

'
:
&

"
%

1)
)

#
%

!"!#!
%

&!"#!

'

!

)-
#
!
/)"

0
;
'1

/ "
'%

'
"
'%

'

"0

"&#
'0$&

"
/

#
%!#
!
0!

0!#
<&
)/

%!
/

%
#

'

)"!=

1!""
<&

%-
#)

$
#

,-
#
!)))
!

'%!#
!

%

"
'
1)

#

#
%

!
%

>#!

'

?,-
#
!)))
!

$!""!

#
-
"
'%

:
&

#

##!

'

!

/)"
%
%

<&

#

"

!/)
%

1)

#

#$1
%

:
&

%
#&"
%!""$
&
%
#!#

!""
#$1
%

!

* ?

5

?

/)"1

%8 0'

!")&)
0"!

/

''"

1)
/!&!"

"

%
%!-
!

'$#1

%<&

;/!;

!#$
!;
!)!$
"

!
"
#

"
$%

#
&

&(&
'!

&)#
&

)
%

*#!
)%

"!

%%)
!%%

#
+

#*,-#
'!
#
(

.
/
"!
$ !()
#
%

$

%

%
'!

(

0

%)# "
##(
#"

)# 12

%%

#%)!)#"

%
&

%%)

#%!(
!(

)%

#

)# "

#
)!

)# "

%"
##(
#
#

#%
&

'!

(

3
/
#
'!
#
(

%

%
'!

(

%%)

#

$

*#

#
#

5

%!#

%%)

#

.*#
6 #
#

7

%!#

%%)

#

$

,
%)#
%%
(
%

4,35

*,
%)# )#

#
!##

#

%%)
)%

#
!

)#
&
#*#
6

$

%)#

%%

#
!##

%%(

$

8

)#
%%
(
%

4,3

9##(
#
%%
(
%

4,5

:;<=>?@AB=;CC;=@DA

75 !

$E)6
2

%%
!

)!
%
$
%%)

%

!)
$041!%

!)+

($
6

!

!)+

% ($

%%)
#
$

$%
/

%
!

!)+

% ($

)
%
F

)

%##$#

3*%
6 )%
%
'!

(

%
!

%%)
!
%#
%

%
$

6 !#
#

%%)
(6
(!(

!
(

%
%
)%
041"#(#

)%
01"#(

)%
04#41

#
)

!
"

#

#

#$%

#

"

#$

"
#

#

#

$
'
#$

&

(

)*

"

#$

"
#
#

!
#

&
#&

$"

&'
#$

+

#

& "

#$

"

, "

#$

#
##
+

(

"

- "

#$

#

(

&!%#%

#
."

+

!# #
$

#

&

#

&"

/
0

#

#
"

+

"

+#(

#$

#%

"#%
#$
!#
"$*#$

#

#

#

#+
#
#
#&

2

"

(

+#
"

#

%

(
"

&
+

#

&
"

3"$

0"
#$
"

&
"

#
#$*

#$

"
#

#
"$

#
#

$*

#$

"
&

# #
$
"

"

#

"

&
1

&

"

+"
$

"

&

+

$

$

&

#

#
(
"

&!

4

04
(

"

&+"
$
"

&
5

#

$
$

+

#(#

%

6/

+ #+#&
#

&+#

#
#$

#

#
!

+%
(

#

"&(

#

&+#

+%
$

"
&

#$

"

&#

"$
&#$

(

!
+

4# #
&

#
$
%

' !

(()*+
,

#

-

!

!!'.)*+

!

'

/& %

0(1&

'2
#

'&&

%
/
&&

/

&

#
$

& 3

+
%
'

4

& %

#

/

/

%

#
$
&!

6

,
&

& %

'

%
('

.
#

'

$

4

7 %

#

&&

$

!&
2"

(

((

1

#

&&

/
!
2
&

8
#

&&

#
#
#/&
&
#

' &&

!

"

!&/6

/

"

&& %

%

' &&

!

"

" #

9
9
2

!

' !/"

#
2&

5&

5&

&
#/
"

&& %

2&

%

;

##
#

" 9'

%

'
5&

!

<
,

5

' !

' !

#
#
'

&
"

#
/!

!!5
,

*+$

2(()*+

!
"

%%&

#

'
!

!
(

)

!

"

!!
$&

"&"
!

+,-

"
&

#
"

../"*
!
+,0
"$

"
&

*
"

!

!"!

1

"

"

"

2 !

"
34

!5

22 6"!
#,!
#3

(
&$

!

"

'

!
#
!

'
&&"

'
$
""
$

"!

"

'

"&

!

(
&$

'

!!
"

&"&
")#"!
!)

#"!
#
)

$'"
#
"!

#

%

#"!
#

*
&"*

)

$
!

(
&$

#"!

#"!
#
)

$

"

*
)

!"$

6"!
#

&"*

00
!

"
(
"
$

)

*
#7"

#*
"

$

"&"

!"#"!
#&

'

"&
&
#

)

8

!
#
!

"&
&
#

!
!

9

"
#"!

"
!

*

""

!

)

"
#"!

"#

""
"
#""
$
#'

$
!

2-
#

#,
#

#

"
3

!"#

$%

'(!

(

"&)#

!!&$
&%&
&

!
&

!!&!

&)
)

"

!"&

!
!"

!"&

!!
)&

!")#

&

!
! ))

& !

!&

!"
!
&

!!$**

!
&
*
!
!!
%")#

&

!
#

!!

&

!
)
&

&*&

&!!%&
")
&!

!
!
! )

*

&

)
&

$

,- .
!

!/

0#

&

&))#

!

(
&1
%

#
$
*
2*
!

3 ))
%

")#

*&

*& &
*
!
&

#

&

!"!
5

*)
$%

*

*& &

**
&

!&&))

!6

$ !
!
5 %

*& &

**
&

!

,

&

3 )*

7)&

(&"
&!*
"!%

(&8/

!
&

3 )*

&

209

&

!
&

)#

$)
%

!
&

!!
&

&
!(

&!(

*

&

:;<=>?@=;<=A:B=C@=DEFBGHI@C?IA=J

KL
&

!
&

*!
&

&
&

3 )*

&

$
!%1

))

$&
*

&%

!

K M

&

!!
&

(

$"
!"!

!"&

!(

&$
3 )*

!!
&

(

$"!

!"
!
&

!
!
&

"&))
)
&!

&

!
&

*
&

!+%

!%

*
&

!7! ))

($

&

8

K, #

&
#

!!
&

(
&' !

&!%

$

KK &!&

)&
!!$!

*!!
&

(
(&
&

"
!&&!
!)&

&

K-

!!
&

(
*&

&
&

!!&$&' !

&(&
&

!
#

%
$

&
'
#

(
)
$

$
$

* +
$

'$
#

$
--
-.-/

(
$
"'

$
(
&

$
!$

($
$

1 '

%
$
&
"
"

($&

&
1

%
$
&

!$
(
$
$

$
&&

&(
$
$"

(

(
#

,
$#0"

(

$
/

&
"

(
$

(
$
&'

%
$(

'
"

$
/

$

,

$
&

!$
&

(
)
(

0""
0 ($

5&
1 /

-6 -

(

(
&
7'

$
'

!""

$

'

$0$ "

''
$
$0

' &

$06
((

"
&

#
(

(

$$

#

$
&

/

(
$
$$'%
#

(
0

&

1 "'

$'

$ $

&
:"

$
$

'

!"

&

$

&

"

(

1
"'

&

"""

!
"

"#$

%#
&

%(
#

"

'%

'
$

)

&

*

"
(
'
(

+
%
'
*
!
'

%

&

*
!

,-

%#
&
(

%

+

%

&

%
&
.

"
#

*
'
"

"!
+
"
&

%
*

"
%

)

,/
#

*
'

%#
&
(

%

+

%

&

%
&
.

/
#

*
'

%#

&

#+
%

/
#

*
'

%#
&
(

#
*'

/0/1/2

*
'

*'

&
#

34567839:;64

!"#"

% &''
(

%
) *+* ,)+-- ./*,) +-- ,,+*0 -+1*2 3+*+-, +4 5/63 *5/*4 36- ) 7*8 . ,+--9 + ./--0 ./9 -+4,+6 **9+ ,0,3 +*4+ 7) ) -+, +4 ), ,6.+,% -- 3+*+-, +4 36, /,4 ,)+-- 1 7 +4 7)/ .-+7, * 4., +4 . 5/+-0 +4 6*.*3+ +, ,6.4% ** ,+--+ . +0 **9+ 7*82 ) *+* ,)+-- ,/13 .* +66*:+- 10 ) 0 + -, . +-- 3+*+-, +4 36, ) *+* 6*6,, /,%

)/-4 ) *+* 6*6, /, 3+*+-;,< * 36, )* )+ ), ,)7 ) -+,2 ) *+* ,)+-- ,/13 7*92 ) 0 + *5/, 4:+ .*3 ) -+,% +36-, . ) 3+*+-;,< * 36, ,)+-- +36+0 ) *5/, *4* +,,, 0 ) :+-/+ . ) 6*6,4 ,/1,/%

) 1/*4 . 6*. ,)+-- 1 1* 10 ) *+*%

=%
) -+, +* 4+9*+33+% -- **9+ 5/63 ,)+-- 1 -+4 +66*>3+ +*+, ,)7% .-, 7) >,9 4, * 6*6,4 6-+9, ,)+-- 1 *,-:4 ) .-4% *+* ,)+-- .0 0 . .-, 7)) ) ?@ABCDEFBG BH IJFKJL FG EJ@ MBGE?NKEB?OA PDQRS@GEL IBDCQ KNDA@ N ADTAENGEFNC 4:+ .*3 ) 4,9 2 7/-4 6, + 6/1- )*+ * )+U+*42 * 7/-4 *+, 6*V ,%

% W&

( &

% &, +45/+ /31*, . ,8--4 7*83 7) +* )*/9)-0 *+4 +4 >6*4 ) ,,+*0 *+., +4 7) +* 36--0 .+3-+* 7) ) ,6.4 *5/*3, +4 ) 3)4, 44 .* 6*6* 6*.*3+ . ) 7*8 . ), ,%

%
&

% -- 7*8 ,)+-- 1 9/+*+4 +9+, +-- 4., 7*83+,)62 3+*+-,2 +4 5/63 .* ;< 0+* .*3 4+ . .+- ,6% -- 6*1-3, *-+4 ), 4., +4 +--4 ) + . ) *+* 10 ) 0 4/*9 ), 6*42 ,)+-- 1 **4 10 *+* 7) X 4+0, . .+ + )+*9 0%
=% 0 ,)+-- )+: ) *9) 3+8 3*90 *6+*, 7)/ *-:9 ) *+* . ), 9/+*+ 1-9+%
. +0 , *6, 10 +4,+6 *) +* *5/*4 10
0 4/*9 9/+*+ 6*4 1+/, . **9+ ,0,3 6*1-3,2 +4,+6 *) ,)+-- 1 6+4 +4:+ 10 *+* + + *+ . YZ%[)/*% ),

! "
# $
%
&'

&(
& $

!

) " *

& #

& *

& ! "
#+

,-./ 0 1 ,.2345/6

+7 8

)

& 9*) #

$ %
& " &) )
"

%#
*

$
+

+
:

+
& ; **
& "<
7+

** #

$ :
=
&& 7>
? ?
#

&(
?*
(

(

77 )

+
#

$ )

!& %# &
" =
( )
"

@

)( A( ; 77(
*

++
+
& )*
? %#
8 B77C
%
& !+
+

" #

$ )
&&( ?*
D

( #&
B( :
**
&
&
)*
? %#
8 BEE+

*
#

$ )
& "
)
*

)&
=
&& !+
+

))&& $? )
"

& )*
? %#
8 FEB
& G8

77ED7E
+
H+ :
=$
; **
& "
7+

** #

$ =
&& "
) "
=$
?
#

& "
)
8 I

& $

?*+
+

" #

$ )
&&(
?*
D

( #&
B( :
**
&
&
)*
? %#
8 BEE+
+

$ J
K
& ILFJ

**
& 9

(
& )*
? %#
G8

77ED7E
+
+
?#?
**
& "
7+

** #

$ =
&& "
) 7> M

$& NIF7 )

&
"
)
&

& FBF+
+ **
**
& " $
&
%
? "
) $
&<
7+

** #

$
?* O(
8 H

& %# %
# **
"(

&
"

&
& '(
&D
)*
'+
+ **
**
& "
$

&<
7+

** #

$ ?* (
8 H

& %# %
# **
"(

&
"

&
& '(
&D
)*
'+
:+ H

**
& "<

!

" #" $% &' #" !#

(#)%
* +,
-%

! $
" #" &
."
!#/ # "" (%

0
1

#2
# "

! ( 3
"
/

4
* *

%#
"#

)
56789 7:5 ;<=>?=65 8:@?? A5 BC
DEF ><588G<5
)

% "#

) .( .#" !3 ()
##% H
#

# (
$ #
"

!
" " "# $%

I (%
J

! ) " $

#K"

I
# (%

.#( L."# ).

I

!
"

$ M. 87@>?58 8>@N5; 5O56?P 5O5<P QF RF S6 N5675<T @6; U=7: 7US 87@>?58 % (

(
.
% K
K
J

3 )

" $ () .)
(
.
% K
K

I /
" #V.# .)

(
.
% K
K !. ).
K ) .
(
.
%
#W
X

.) (
.

K
K $.
" !

"

&

I
Y

#
)#
H #

# )

#
#"

33
.!%
".#% ) .( .#H

! ( 3
" (
$ ).

.#( L."# ).
"#
.!%

!
"

$ M. 8S=? 87@>?58 8>@N5; 5O56?P 5O5<P QF RF S6 N5675<T @6; U=7: 7US

% (

Z
*

IIH
Y

Y

IIH + IIH
[Y
0 Y

II

K
K

! ( 3
"
/

\ +0-]
I
I

+ 2(
$ #K "K

! ( 3
"
/ " "

K

)
" #"

!3
(
(# H
(# ")
# K
"H

\ B^5_G?@7=S68 ^5?@7=6_ 7S D<S88 DS665N7=S68F`

+ + 2(
$ #K "K

! (" $ #

"
2
H " $
#

"
.(( K
K

!
(

% "K (#) #
(
##%
3 )

!"
#$ %%

!
$ !
#

!
'
%%

#& # (#

! ) & *% #$
' #
$#$ &
#

+

&
,
&#

! ) & *% #$
' #

&" &
#

"
-

"
, !
$ )
, & # (#

&
# (# .#
.

!
*% /012 3 ,#

$ %%
2

#
,

$
/ 4 #%%
.$ #$

$ )
$
!
#

#& $
%

5&5 "

&#

! !
#6

$$ "& & (( "
!, "&

4 22 +7

.#
. !8

! ) & *% #$
' #

&" &
#

9:;< = > ?@?AB<CDE

8#( & #
#
#$ $
$
"&& "
6 ) &

! %
)
($
#

$
$
(#
(
* #$
%
%
(%
) & "
6
#

%
$

#
)#
*
$
#

$
+ ) -
&

&" #
#%%
8(#
# &
#
8#

# (
! .
)$

) $
#

$ $
, &

) "
6 &# #
)
"& &

#
#$
#%
&
&#

! )$ (($#
* !)
#* "
6
$

) &
%
$

)

"$
#

( )

%
!
* )
#*

#$F
(

#
* (#6 &
*
( %
# #$G #
* #
#$$#

*
#$
#%
&

%,
#* $#$ & $
#",

$#,
#((#
*
%%, #.$
%
#
#$

+

%% #$ G %(
&#

!
#

$ %
#$ #
#

)
&" %#.$ #
#

& $
#",
)

#
*
*

$ &
"
&
# %,

&" %#.$ #
#

!
#

.
#
$, $#
&
#

! "#$ %
&& '
&&!

(
$
)
!**#& &

!
# %+
#
! &

&

#
& &
*
#$

&&
, - %
&& ' (
*! +%
!

%

%
&&
(!

! !

+
% .
!
!

% #
$& * % . $
% !

+
%
&& ' !

!#'& $!

! %
&& &

&. %+
&& &
*
& (
&( /

(
&( / "#) #&

(
&( / %) (
&( / '
)*&+
(
/
!
#$

&&
'.

#&
!
!$ *
$ *0! '1 #%
+
&)
! '#&!

% !

%
&& '

(! '. %
!

% '*
*
&
.$ #!

%
&& '
(!! %
!

% # $& *
% . $
% %

%
&& &

&. %+
%

%

%
* %

&&

,
* $
%

&&
/
(!

*

%
&&
-
% %

%
&& ' ! % *&&+
$

3 4
!#

! !

+

5 %
+&& * % ! * %
&&
!

&
/ +%

&
/ %

(
! '.
% (
&( 6 &
!
&
) $

)

'

!

%7

(
& * %

8
$
%

4 $& &

% %
&& ' *
% !
& !

+

* !
&

' *
*

$'& / %
$'& %
&& ' !

!
+%

7 $$!

*
%
$$!

! # ! +% %
!

%
*&

! %
&& ' # !
&& $
& %

! *
&
(
&(/ +
1
! '
)*&+
$'&

;

:<2

$ &
%
&& ' &
!

%

:

%
&& %
!
%

! +%
+ %
!
$

#
! 9$#$ +!% *
.
% %
&& ' *#

% /
4 $ % !
$
* / +%%(

:
)*&&
!

$
(

. 0
(

*
) #
!/ 0
(
*#
% !

! '
)*&&

! +% +&&

!!
! <
% (
! *
*
'
#
! !'
%
$
. !
$

$0 #' & +% &

!
$ *

/ !
'#

&
& +

! &

&
!# %
&& ' &

$

!
* %
!

!
*
/ +%
$$#$
! "#(
& *

!" ! ##$# % &
!'! %'# ! ' !(

%'# ' '!(
) *++ ,-.//0-. ,1,. 23 4156.7.- 584 /65++.- /95++ 95:. 79. ;<--.;7 /1=.4 ;<8;-.7. '$ >
? !

( ! "'@ !>'$
!A % !
A#B ! >!

"!
"C ! C

>D !( 'C !( ! ( %

'$ ' D '"' %
( A' (#
> !'@
'$ >
? !' > !

(
' !(!'( ('!DA '
E !(!'( !( F( !'(A
@ %' F %

!

!

> $ G$!'C H'!

@ !#%'( D !

>$'' !( %
'#"(

" D
(( I !

> #!( !'(! D
J

"
'##(( >@ #!$%!$'' !

> $(

" !

> $( %'# ! ! !" >
( "'A
K
!

!

! !

> !'(! D
J LLM !(
'G$'# '

!' !

> H'( !#>
A !

D
" D
(( I !
'
'"$
@ #!( I !"(( N!(
A %

%

DA IA
!

$'
'' #
%(
J

N
" !

> !

(

( $ ! #!' ! #!'!
(
(
'' $'%! %

' H'$(( '' %

($'A
IA

'!((

I !

> #!( $A
%
!
'
%
(

" !

> $( D '!(( I
O
!

! ! > ?(C !''( ' 'D (!#!A( !

> '#"(
!( '

!(
!

!

> !?( %'# ( ( ' !

D
%' P % % H
! !( '!
' P % % '!A '$
Q

!

> H
( D!' %' M $' !%'
!
" D
(
! > #!(
E '

% (#
!' #!
!' I(C !

> #!( D
(
' %A

KRN

#"" $ #

%#"& '"

# $'

"" '
(
!) #

"" !

#"" $

#&

!

' +, !
""
!

-
%
!

'
))
) ' . #

/
' "0
1"!2
!

! !

"
&
)
3
%#

/45

"

" 3
%
#"" #1 ))
) 1
' +6
/ !

#"" #1 ))
) ' +,6 1

#
3

*
1#" $
% !1%2 "" !!%
#"" #1 ))
) 1
' 6 '
) $) ' !1% *
!

$
% !1%2 "" !!%
#"" #1 ))
) 1
' 789 '
) $) ' !1%
"" !!%

!#"

!1%
#"" $
""
"1

#&

"
1%
#"" $ !
)

!1%
'

$" "
&
"12 #
#"" '&
!
# )) "&

" $0'"" :'

;6<
#"" $ !"

)

' #

!'
2 3# ))
)
(
1" ' ,
5 /0'""
#"" $ )! "'
' )
# ;6 #%#
&
)!
$" = %

! ' $0'""
#"" '
) = %

3#

0

2 #
)!

%
"

> ?*
@

"" $0
% ' #

#"" $
!! 3# 6A" A6 #0 1"1
2

!!
1 (
"2

=

))B !

/ C

#"" $ '"

# =

!
1 1

!
& = !1%
D

)
#
!

!
"# $ !%& '( " !% &
' ) &
' '
"# *%% !&& ' !%+ & ! % ' %&
$ $)+ ,
%+
!
*' ! & ) &
# )
$
#+ '& " &!$
&'%% &! '
"# ! ' )&& & ' %&

-
#

' !
"# &'%% "
& & %( &)' ( &,

*' "
&
)! && . - "
!%# /&

0
)(
"
& $ ) "' ' &
& $ '
"# ' $#&

)( + # & )&
$ )
"# $#
1
"# ( $#& *' &
% ) & '
"# &
$
%%
& $#

'# '%&

0 2%&+ $ &%% $ ) &+ &'
% " ) *' !
' $ '
&3 & )) "
' )
$
$ ' ) & &!$ '
%&
2%& &'
% " ) *' ' '&
"# & %4 $ &&
+ % *
&'%% "
'
#' ' '&5
"# ! !
'#
6& &
*&# ) *' !
'# '%& '&5
"# )
7 # #% ' '&5
"# *' ' !
'# %

89:;<=>?@ ABBCD<E F=G HI=; 9JK=>? 9B ?I:HD L=9M NO C9DD< PJ9D C9:;<DC CB 9M:9 9JK=>? L=<< %
$% " ( %
"
)
%'# )Q ' &!%& & #' '
'
)! '
" 6& /
&
#' &!%& '%
"# !&
) ! ! &!#

00 R
6

6! )!% $ ' ! &!
# &
&)+ ! )
%'#+
&'%% )& ' &
&) $

! &( $ ) ' #
%% "

# ' & !#
' &!# %
' ,
S 1 &'%% %( ' /" !"% &
' & ) ' !! (% $ '

TUV WX YTZ[\WU

!"!
#

$ %&&'(

$ )*+
)

,- ,.)/0, 1+ 2)/+*
) 1, ,.3 .
41,- 1, ,5
6
+ .
)

1+ 1,

+
+ 6) 1 754

1+ 5)5
) ,1441$
.
41, 1)
+12)1771$
44 541 71
)14 41, ,.3 1)
155)871
$
.
1+,15
).
.1,
5)
51)
+ .
541 4
2 + .
41, 49 1, 1 *

.
)1) 1+
1,,/7
, )
,5,049 6) , 1/)19$
.
)1) , *
)69 144 :/1
,
1+ ,;
,$ )1) ,.144 6)7 9 77
+1
49 6 19 +,)
51
, 0
3

:/1
, 1+ ,9704, ,.3$

$ <%

( %'

$ %,
1+
:/1
/70
), 6 ,=44
+ 3)=7
3. 1)
.)/2.49 )1
+ 1+

85 )

+ .

,,1)9 )16, 1+ 3. 1)
754

49 61741) 3. .

,5
6
+ )
:/)
7 , 1+ .
7 .+,

+
+ 6) 5)5
) 5
)6)71
6 .
3)=
6 .,
$

>$ 41 71
)14, ,.144 0

)6
+ 09 1
) ?
+
)14
5,$ 6 2)/4/)
- 0
6)

6)7 .1;1)+/, ,
, ) 1551)
+,
1,
- 1+ 0
.)/2.49 )
+ 0/ )
0/+ ) *
)2)3 1
),$

$ 41 71
)14, ,.144 0
6/),.
+ .
:/1
, 1+@) ,512 ,5
6
+ 1+
,.144 0
6 .
2 /,- ,5

, 1+ ,;
+1
+ .
541 4
2 + 6 .
41,$
/0,/ 6 19 ,/. +1
+ 541 71
)14, ,.144 0
5 )7
+ /4
,,
,5
61449 155)*
+ 09 .
1+,15
).
$ 1+,15
).
,.144 ,
4
1+ 12 144 541 71
)14 A 08 ,;
) 41)2
)$

$ &

%'

$ &1
1
,.144 0
2 1 614 ,5
1+ 1
51
6 ,1441 09 9-
1+
8
+ 6) 1 5
)+ 6 +19,$ &1
1
,.144 4/+
=

52 ,1441
4
1 1+ 6)

6 3

+,- )1,. 1+ +
0), 1, 3
44 1, 7112 541 71
)14$

>$ 44 541 71
)14 ,.144 0
2/1)1

+ 6) 1 5
)+ 6 ,8 BCD 7.,$ 44 ,5
7

71
)14 A 08 ,;
1+ 41)2
) ,.144 0
2/1)1

+ 6) 1 5
)+ 6
BD 9
1)$

$ '
541
7 ,E 44 541 71
)14 +

))12 ) +92 3. .
2/1)1

5 )+
,.144 0
)
541
+ 1, 719 7
, 1,

,,1)9- 1+ 155)*
+ 09 9- 3. 541
71
)14 .
,17
,;
1+ ,5

, 1, ,5
6
+ ) 1, +)

+ 09 41+,15

1).
- 3. 1
3 31))19 77
2 +1
6 )
541
7 - 1+ 1 ,
9$

!
""

$ !

#

!
%&

!
""
&
#
'!

$ !

!
"" #
(

!

""

&"%
$ # !

#"

)

*+,- . / *,0123-4

5 67

6
"9
!
""

:&

$
!

"

% "

;;

"
#
#
!
""

:&

$
!

"
% "

<=>?=@A ?BCAA DE FAC?? GH C? IE?@JKCLEI @K LBE MNOEEK P==QRH CKI ?BCAA DE IEESEI &

"
$ &

T5UV

&
!

&

$ " #&

&
#

$
W
"
!
"" &
#
'

:&
$
W
" '!! !
""

'

$

%

!

$
% &"&
" "
W
"&
'!!

!
!

>O=>=?EI ?=XOYE Y=S>A@E? Z@LB MNOEEK P==QR ?>EY@[@YCL@=K? [=O L=>?=@A IE?@JKCLEI "

\ ;]^

;&"! !
""

$

$
!

U
7
_
]`

(

%&
!
""

$

$

"
'%

a
^7 ;
7

W
!
#

"
$
""

&
:&
$
#"

""

"

!

&
b
!

W
" $ !

*+,- c / ded32-f0g

! !
"!
#

#$ %

&
'
%
!

!
!

( !
''
'

)$* '

!+ "
"

%( !

!
,

" % '
+* '
+ % (
$

* !"
*
'$

!
* -
-

! -
-

''
'
"
( &
$
! +
(
"

-
% ( %
&
#

'

! (
"

' '
( %( !
'

%

'
!"

%

#
!*

"
%"

'
&
( % (

!."

( $

'
% !
/"

( !!

(

&
'
%
! '

'
'

(

' #

!
%

!
&( ( '
&
++ #$ 0

!
%

&
%

#
! ' (
'
+* %

!
!
-
%
'
%

'
! '

* %

! !
!
!

*
'

'
%
% '

!

*

* %

% #

!
* $
! !
&
* ! "

-
'1 +
% 23
43 !

5 66176*
!

! &(

(

* !

&

"+

( '
!

+

, 8

% -

!+
'
! &
92: &

#
"%
%
!.
'-+* !*
-
* &

3: &

# &"
!+ +"! %

,
%
! !"+ '

( ! %
+!+*

!
! +

'(
! #
;<=<>?@A< B<CD@>@E<F G; H<C IGJKLG>?KC<CM; ;H<>@L@>G?@NJ;O

& ''-
&(

( ' ''
% (

&!
*

!
* %"+!

&
"

P9Q !(

GL?<C ?B< B<CD@>@E< @; GHH=@<EF NC G; H<C IGJKLG>?KC<CM; ;H<>@L@>G?@NJ;F H=GJ?<C; ;BG== &

! ! +"&&
! !

!
&

&
!
'

! % %%

'
+

! P

&(
!

Q !
'
% 9: &

#
+!

$
! !
&

: !

&

-
! %

'
!
-

( -

!
!

'*
!

! -

'
%
! &-

"" #

$
%
&
! '($ )"
*
' #')

(

'(
% !

"" ($

"

!

"" #
!
*

"

)$'$ $
'

( *+

"" #
)
$
! !,' #
(
!'

)"
)

)

"
""

-'
#

)

. !
"

'# )

"" #
01 $

*!
!
!

)

"" #
!'

-'
*
"
&
"
! #$

"" )"

"
*
*
! ""* !

/ +("" $
"

"" #

'

", #"
!
! $2'
(
304 )
,)
0 "
$
!$
! * 34 )
&

"
*
#"

% ))&
!
-' "%

"" #
)"
! *
""
)"

)
$ '( '
5
'
!

" *

"" )"

"" #
))
", )'
!%

! )
% !

% *

"
!%

, *"" #
"
&
" *
( "
''!

#
$

"" #

'
! '!

)
$

(

)" )

)

"" #

(""
! *
*
% ""*
!
+% ! (""
!

""
( !)
'#

#
$

"" #
+
! "
&
" *

''!

""*
$)"
( )"
! !)
% 6 $$'$ " ,
(
,)
0 789:;< =>? @;> AB?>>C DEEFG< H;I99 J> I==9K>L @E I99 =9IC@>? H8?MI:>H IH H;ENC EC

"
O'"

"" #
) +

! # "

, !
)

))&

#'"+
'
!&
( !
"&
,

1
P

QR

"" #

+
!
',
! $$
!
", (

)"
!%
)
!
"%
! +

# "" (

S'
!

T Q

Q) $)"
(

! *+%

""
$&
"" '##

! !
#

'"
($

)

%
$&
''

!
-')$
!
$)"
$

(

&
% ! "
&

&"&
!
!
) #"

!
'

))& " (

!"

10 23. ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A: Contract Services Agreement
Exhibit B: Rain Bird Technical Specifications

CITY OF LAWNDALE

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR

ROGERS ANDERSON PARK IRRIGATION SYSTEMIMPROVEMENT PROJECT This Contract Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this ___ day of _____, 20__, by and between the City of Lawndale, a municipal corporation ("City"), and ___________________ ("Contractor"). The term Contractor includes professionals performing in a consulting capacity or contractors performing contract services. The parties hereto agree as follows:

1.0 SERVICES OF CONTRACTOR

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contractor shall provide the work and services specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Contractor warrants that all work or services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.

1.2 Contractor's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Contractor's proposal or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All work and services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Contractor shall obtain at its sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Contractor shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, taxes, including applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Contractor's performance of the services required by this Agreement; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any claim for such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contractor warrants that Contractor (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the work and services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.

1.6 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Contractor, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Contractor. Any increase in compensation of up to five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum or $25,000, whichever is less, may be

!
"#$#"
" $#

#
"

%"#

"""

""

"
$"

!&"

!

##
$$"
$#$

""
"

"$

'
(
")#
$

$

&
$
*
")#
$*+,-./.0121

"
&

+,-./.0
121

+,-./.0121""

'
3
$"4&
""$"&
"""
"
$""&

#"
5" ""
$
"""
$"&
"""
"$"

"

6789:;<=>?@AB:>
C
' #$
5
##

$ ""
$
&
*#" $
*+,-./.01D1

#%

$%
$#$$#
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE""FGEEEEEEEEEEEEEHF* #$*H %

'
I
$$
$
"#JF
H"#$#$$#
$"
F

H$
&

$"

F

H$

$$
"# K

#" $

#%

#$F
H#$$

#"
$

$
$
"#
$#$#"%
#

#" $

#$""
"# ""L$

"$

$&
#$
)#
$&
""$
""
&!

""$"

#$
)#
$

"

$

$L

C
C
M$
N"$$$

#"
$

$
&
&

$ "

F'H&!

#$ ""#$

$
K
O
5

%

(
C
"" ""%&

##

$
""&

FPQH "R
FSTH
$#$

C
P

"
"
5#

$##""#&

$
"
""
#

#$
""
#
"

!
"!
!
#"$"!

""!$

!
%

!
"
"
!!"!

&'()*+,-+./01*213*456*
7 8 "
"
"

7 9 "!:
"

"
""
"

"
%""!
!

"%
!;<
!="!:
"=

"!
>?@ABACDED$
$
!
"
! "
FG!
"$H
!;<"!"!:
"

!%
"
"
H"!!!;8IJ<!
"

7 7 K"

L
!;<"!"!:
"

"
"!!

H!! "

!
!
"
!"
!%
"

"$"!$ "!$
"M! "$

%
$$
G
N$!$!"$G

"$$N$
$
%
$
$
!O
"

"$"! $
"
$
%;8J<!
"""!
$
"
"%
"
!

"
"

"

"
!H!

!H!

"!"!!
%
!$L!

"
"$"!
L!

"
"P!

!
""

" !"

!

!

"
$%
"
!Q

"P! H

"

7 R
S

!
""!
"%"T
R %$

""
!""
"

UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

V'(1--+4W0/XW-0-,Y-+Z R
8

"
UUUUUUUUUUUUU !
!

"
[!
"
%"%N
"
"!
!
N
!"""%

H!!
H"$N%!$"

!

%

!"

$

!
!"

"

"
!!
"

"!
K

$

"!$

!"!
"%H%

R
9
"
"
P

!
!

[!
"
%"%N
!
"
!
N
!"

!

"

#

$!%&!'

!%
(
&

"&

%#
%&" "

"
%"&
'
"!(&'

)
* +
'
#'

'%
,!-$
&'-
!
"&!# -
!!

&%!
"

#

&#%
"

'%
-

""
!%
!
(
.#&#&#,!

!!(

"
&&-

'%"
%"
&

'&
#!!!(
"

&#&

#&

"!
'#!!

'%"(!/01!

!&2
$'

##%#
(

(&
!!(&

"
#" "

"#&#,!

)
) &!&
""
%!
"

("

(%%
" -
'
%!
"
-!%
(

.#&-,!

(
.#&

&!& "&

%#&
"
#
'

"%"%!
"

'
%!
"
'
%!
"
"
"

"""!#!

%&%&!
#

3(#
%%"3!

456789:;<8=><8?78?>@87A7=<B7C8
0 D
#

!#&%-

&,!
-% &

" "-&#'%

'%
#&'",

-

'!

#E
%%
F
G
"
#

!
"%%
'

"
##
'
#(

%%
F
G
"!
"% FHH
HD-&&!/HH)-,.#(

('&&

#&

%&
(#

"
I

%#
!&&&
%

JD-HHH-HHH!#

J/-HHH-HHH'

'''

K$
%!

#

!
"$
%!

#
L!!(&!
"%!(&'
#"

.#&"

%!
"

"
%

JD-HHH-HHH!&

#%(
#

!
"%!
(#%

"

#!#

%#

J/-HHH-HHH
HH!&-
%&
'

%
&!
"

#&('&-&-

&&&

G
"&
%

!
"
MMMMMMMMMMMM
#%#

JD-HHH-HHH
HH!
%
!

!
"

!
!

!##
!$% !&%'

(

!
! !)&

"

#

!
!(!

!
*
#!

!!
*
"

(

$+,'!( !
!"
!

#
(

(-"+

"(.

!(

! !"

-"+

!(!/( !

!!
!

)

!
( (
"

0
!

!
!
!
0

#%
% 1
2 3!2
#
!!
!
4 #

0
(
!.
!

0

"

5
!(.

# (

0

0

-"+"
-"6 "

$'!&
7
!"8
(

)
#

/ !
(#

!#

! !)&!

#

##/#

!)/

(
!!
(

# #
##
!
$!!

(

!'

"

$ '!
&
7
!"

/ !
(#

!#

! !)&!

!$

!
#
##
#/!.#(

#

!)#
#/('#
(
#0
#!(!

#(
#

!
"
!!!
!
!#!

!
##!

$
%&'()*+(,-./,()0+(1-
2$3 $ !!
!!

4

!!4 $
2$5
$ !!6#
4
6#
6

!!

4

!

! $ !! !!

6

!!
!

#!

#
#

6

$
!!

789
!!"!
#

!!

4
$
2$8
": $
!!
"###
#

!

#!
#

!!

!!

!

4

!!
! !

! !;

!!
"

!$

"
!!

$

<
= !

" " >

"!!

?!6
"
!
!

!!

!!
!$

!!
!!

#
! # !!

!!
!$
@&')/A+(*)B)/1+A.C())B)/1
D$3 !E"$
!!

"!" !$E!

#! !
!!

E
!# !#

#

!<

$
D$5 F
$

>

! 7"
979

"

"

!##
!
!#

#
79!! "

!
!

?! ?
!

$
!

#
!

"

#

"!

#" !
!

"!
# !$!

!

"
#

$ #
$
%
&%' (
%
#"

#"#!#

)

$
#

#

"$
"#!

%
$
#*

$$

#
!#$
#+
$
#*

$$

!"

#$
#*

$$

#!+

#
!#$
#

#
"!

#

"

#$

"
%
&%, "

-$

"%$
#"
#"

#"

$
#.'/0
#*

$
#%1$
$

#
"

""
#

2
$

"
#!$
#
$$!#

%

!

"$

!
2$

#$$

"

#
3!#

#
!
"!"

#
"$

$

%
&%4 "$
(2
"

5

% "

!

"

#"
#

$

&%6

22

$
"
"$
!#

!
!

"$
+
"$

$

.$
#

! "

"
0

#"
#

#$
#"

$$ ) $

$
#"

"

#
$#
%
&%7

#*8% $
#
"
+

"

$
#

#

$

#
#

"

$

$
#

$

# "
#!

!

#9

"
$:"

2
$

#

%
;<=>?@ABCC?>DEFGHIDJKLBADDFMHBHNI?F>E?J?HG@?BH
O%P
)
!# #

"$#% "$# #

!$

#
!

#
!

!# #

#
"
"
#!"

!

#!

"
"
%
O%6

Q #% "$# #

# "$#$
$

#

"

$

$

#

%
O%'

Q

%

$
#

#$
#

#"
#

!

"
%

! !
"

$

!

%

&

%#

"#
%

!

!

'

!%
!%
%(

"

$
)$* '

+$ '
!%

,
!!

!

%

!

!!

!
!
,! !!

$
#

!
!
,! !

$
-./ 0123455674892:;8<121872
=$>
$

'

%

%

!

@!

!

!

A

!>*B>BC
'

!A

!
=DEFD!

!

$
%

'
@GBEH

$
=$E

$

$
=$I
J

$

'
!

!
!%

!

%

%%
$
=$*
'
%$

'

%

(
! '

%

'
%

'
'

'

'

%%

$
=$K

$

,

%

GH
&

,!GH

%

!GH%
,

%

'

!
G'H

'
'

%
$

!" #

#$% &
'()*+
,
-
.
-
"

/

01233333333333333333333333333333333
%4
//5
/
1

3333333333333333333333333333333333

% 1 /6

44
7.

2 0
6//"8 --4

33333333333333333333333333333333
9! 1
&

1 1
1

2
!
:

#

"1 &
./ !1
!"&

';<)=>');=+

"1"

01233333333333333333333333333333333
"2"

/2/

01233333333333333333333333333333333
"2"

/2/

Network Communication Cartridges upgrade
ESP-LXME2, ESP-LXME2 PRO, ESP-LXIVM. ESPLXIVM PRO, ESP-LXME, ESP-LXMEF and ESP-LXD Series controllers with cellular Ethernet or direct
cable capabilities. The communication cartridge
connects to the back of the controller faceplate
and provides the communication link between
IQ4 and the controller.

Applications
ApplicationsIQ4 is the perfect irrigation control
solution for parks departments, school districts,
property managers, landscape maintenance
contractors, and water managers. IQ can
manage small single-controller sites as well as
large multi-controller sites. Communication
cartridges are compatible with the ESP-LXME2,
ESP-LXME traditionally-wired controllers with 1
to 48 station capacity, ESP-LXD 2-wire controllers
with 1 to 200 station capacity, and ESP-LXIVM
2-wire controllers with 1 to 240 station capacity.

Communication cartridges are initially
configured through a setup wizard provided in
the ESP-LX Series Controller IQ4 Settings dial
position. Communication setting parameters are
configured through the IQ4 software or the IQ4
Configuration Software designed for netbook/
laptop/Windows tablet use on the job site.

Direct Satellites
Single controller sites would use a
communication cartridge configured as a Direct
satellite. A Direct satellite has an IQ4 central
computer communication connection but no
network connections to other satellites in the
system.

Server & Client Satellites
Multi-controller sites would use one
communication cartridge configured as a
Server satellite and the other communication
cartridges configured as Client satellites. The
Server satellite has an IQ4 central computer
communication connection and shares this
communication connection with the Client
satellites though high-speed data cable or
radios. The communication connection between
Server and Client satellites is called the IQNet™.

Satellites on a common IQNet can share weather
sensors and master valves.

Server and Client satellites using high-speed
data cable for IQNet communication require
installation of an IQ CM Communication
Module. Server and Client satellites using radio
communication for IQNet communication
require installation of an IQSSRADIO or RBSSTN9B radio. Each cartridge kit includes cables to connect the communication cartridge to
connection module and/or radio.

NCC-4G Cellular Cartridge
• Includes embedded 4G Cellular Data Modem
with antenna connector
• Includes internal antenna for plastic controller
enclosures (optional external antenna
available for metal case controller enclosures)
• Requires 4G Cellular data service plan
purchased from Rain Bird with cellular service
included
• Used for Direct or Server Satellite applications
requiring wireless Cellular communication
with IQ4
NCC-EN Ethernet Cartridge
• Includes embedded Ethernet Network
Modem with RJ-45 port
• Includes RJ-45e patch cable
• Requires LAN network static IP address
• Used for Direct or Server Satellite
applications requiring Ethernet LAN network
communication with IQ4
NCC-RSRS232 Cartridge
• Includes RS-232 Port for IQ Direct Cable or
External Modem communication connection
to IQ4
• Includes external null modem cable
• Used for Direct or Server Satellite applications
requiring direct cable connection or external
modem (radio or other third-party device)
communication with IQ4
• Used for Client Satellite applications requiring
IQNet high-speed data cable or radio
communication with the Server Satellite

IQ-PSCM-LXM
• Adds server/client hardwired central control
capability to the LXME2 Pro.
• Replaces LXME2 Pro base module
IQ FSCM-LXME Flow Smart
Connection Module
• Provides IQNet high-speed data cable
connections for ESP-LXME, ESP-LXMEF
Controller
• Includes Flow Smart Module and Base Module
functions
• Replaces standard ESP-LXME Base Module
IQ CM-LXD Connection Module
• Provides IQNet high-speed data cable
connections for ESP-LXD and ESP-LXIVM
Controllers
• Installs in ESP-LXD/ESP-LXIVM 0 (zero) module
slot
IQ SS-Radio Radio Modem
•Fully enclosed in ruggedized hard case
•Provides IQNet wireless radio communication
between Server and Client satellite controllers
•Can also be used with the IQ NCC-RS RS232
Cartridge for IQ4 to Direct or Server controller
radio communication
•Includes power supply and external antenna
(programming software and cable provided
separately)
RBSS-TN9N Radio Modem
•In plastic case for surface mounting
•Provides IQNet wireless radio communication
between Server and Client satellite controllers
•Can also be used with the IQNCC-RS RS-232
Cartridge for IQ4 to Direct or Server controller
radio communication
•Includes power supply and external antenna
(programming software and cable provided
separately)
IQ™ Network Communication Cartridge
Tech Spec
Specifications
The irrigation central control system shall be
the IQ4 Platform as hereafter specified and as
shown on the drawings. The system shall be fully
programmable, providing the operator with
absolute and full control of the entire irrigation
control. The system shall provide a degree of
flexibility such that, in effect, anything that
could be done at the controller shall be capable
of being done in IQ4.

The system hardware interface to the controller
shall be the Network Communication Cartridge
(NCC). The cartridge shall be designed to install
in the ESP-LXME2, ESP-LXME2 PRO, ESP-LXIVM.

ESP-LXIVM PRO, ESP-LXME, ESP-LXMEF and
ESP-LXD Series Controller faceplate. No tools
shall be required for communication cartridge
installation. The communication cartridge
shall receive power through a ribbon cable
connection to the controller front panel.

The communication cartridge shall be
configured and monitored through a dedicated
dial position on the controller front panel. In
this dial position the communication cartridge
shall be in control of the controller display
and user interface softkeys. The user interface
shall include a setup wizard to guide the user
through the required configuration settings.

The communication cartridge shall be user
configurable as a Direct, Server, or Client satellite
controller.

The communication cartridge shall incorporate 3
communication ports to communicate with the
system central control as well as communicate
with other communication cartridge equipped
controllers via high-speed data cable and/
or radio communication. The communication
cartridge shall incorporate status lights (LEDs)
showing the real-time status of the cartridge
communication ports.

Communication cartridges configured as a
Direct satellite shall communicate directly
with the system central control via the primary
(IQ) communication port. Configuring the
communication cartridge as Direct satellite shall
disable the IQNet high-speed data cable (CM)
and radio (Radio) communication ports.

Communication cartridges configured as a
Server satellite shall communicate directly
with the system central control via the primary
(IQ) communication port. Configuring the
communication cartridge as a Server controller
shall enable the IQNet high-speed data cable
(CM) and radio (Radio) communication ports for
communication with Client controllers. A single
Server controller shall be capable of networking
up to 255 Client controllers across theIQNet
network.

Communication cartridges configured as
a Client controller shall communicate via
the IQNet network with a Server controller.

The Client controller shall not have direct
communication with the system central
control but shall instead use the Server
controller connection. Client controller primary
(IQ) communication port shall be disabled.

Configuring the communication cartridge
as a Client controller shall enable the IQNet
high-speed data cable (CM) and radio (Radio)
communication ports for communication with a
Server controller.

Controllers on a single IQNet network can
share up to 10 master valves and 32 weather
sensors. Master valves and weather sensors shall
be shared across ESP-LXME, ESP-LXME2 PRO
traditionally-wired and ESP-LXD, ESP-LXIVM,
ESP-LXIVM PRO, 2-wire controllers.

Communication Cartridges shall be available
with 4G Cellular, Ethernet, or RS-232 external
modem port. Communication cartridges with
4G Cellular, Ethernet, and WiFi shall utilize static
IP addresses for communication with the system
central control.

The 4G Cellular communication cartridge
(IQ4614) shall incorporate a 4G Cellular data
modem. A SIM card configured with a static IP
address on a wireless network is required.

The 4G Cellular communication cartridge
(IQ4614X) shall incorporate a 4G Cellular data
modem and a SIM card configured with a static
IP address on a wireless network with one year
of service.

The Ethernet communication cartridge shall
incorporate an Ethernet modem. Connection to
the site local area network (LAN) shall be via the
provided RJ-45e patch cable.

The RS-232 communication cartridge shall
incorporate an RS-232 Port for connection to an
external modem. The communication cartridge
shall be provided with an external modem cable.

Server and Client controllers shall utilize a
Connection Module to connect to the IQNet
via high-speed data cable. The Connection
Module shall be controlled by the cartridge
CM port. Connection Modules shall provide
quick connect terminals for connection to the 2
communication conductors as well as ground.

Server and Client controllers shall utilize a
Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum Digital
Radio for wireless communication on the IQNet.

The radio shall be controlled by the cartridge
Radio port. A connector cable to interconnect
the cartridge and radio shall be supplied with
the cartridge.

The system central control shall be capable
of upgrading (reflashing) the communication
cartridge firmware through the IQ
communication port. In this way, new features
can be deployed without the need to replace
the existing communication cartridges.

The communication cartridge shall keep a log of
all controller and IQNet activity for upload to the
system central control.

The IQ Platform shall be as manufactured by
Rain Bird Corporation.

Rain Bird Corporation
6991 E. Southpoint Road
Tucson, AZ 85756
Phone: (520) 741-6100
Fax: (520) 741-6522
Rain Bird Technical Services
(800) RAINBIRD (1-800-724-6247)
(U.S. and Canada)
Rain Bird Corporation
970 West Sierra Madre Avenue
Azusa, CA 91702
Phone: (626) 812-3400
Fax: (626) 812-3411
Specification Hotline
800-458-3005 (U.S. and Canada)
Rain Bird International, Inc.
1000 West Sierra Madre Ave.

Azusa, CA 91702
Phone: (626) 963-9311
Fax: (626) 852-7343
The Intelligent Use of Water™
www.rainbird.com
® Registered Trademark of Rain Bird Corporation
© 2022 Rain Bird Corporation D41907A 15AP21
How to Specify
NCC
Network Communication
Cartridge
X=
A: Australia
B: USA
C: Canada
E: Europe
I: International
IQ CM
IQ Connection Module
IQ FSCM-LXME for ESP-LXME
IQ CM-LXD for ESP-LXD/

ESP-LXIVM

IQ SS-RADIO
IQ Radio Modem

IQ SS-RADIO
RBSS-TN9B Radio
IQ4G-X
NCC-EN Ethernet
NCC-RS RS232

JOINT CITY/SCHOOL DISTRICT PARKS IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

ASSESSMENT, DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
ADDENDUM N0.5
Date: October 10, 2024
To: All Prospective Bidders
The following are clarifications of the project scope:

1.0 QUESTIONSAND RESPONSES (Q & R)
Ql. What is the make and model of the test port to be replaced? More information is needed for vendors to provide accurate quotes.

Rl. The current make and model of the test port is Nibco. We have know preference on the specific model.

Q2. Can a small section of the parking lot be used as a staging area for RogersAnderson, or is it possible to close the entrance by Manhattan Beach Blvd? R2. The City will accommodate a staging area on the grass at Rogers-Anderson Park, due to limited parking we will utilize the grass area.

Q3. Working hours for the project are assumed to be Monday to Friday from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Work cannot occur outside of these hours due to the excessive additional costs that would need to be accounted for. Additionally, the construction site must be closed during this period to ensure the safety of students, teachers, city personnel, and the public. Please confirm this schedule.

R3. Working hours are from 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM. Contractor to provide a phasing plan to work around school grounds and activities to maintain areas open as needed for school use and after-hours sports.

Q4. What is the size of the existing mainline at Rogers-Anderson? R4. The existing mainline at Rogers-Anderson is a 3".
1 CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: November 18, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michael Reyes, Municipal Services Director SUBJECT: Update for City Council on Animal Control Contract with SPCA

BACKGROUND
The City of Lawndale has had a long-standing contract with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) to aid the City with animal kenneling services. This relationship was strained with the adoption of the most recent contract which saw an increase of nearly forty percent in costs over the previous year’s contract. As a result, the Mayor requested that Staff seek alternative resources for the City’s kenneling needs and to provide regular updates to the City Council about Staff’s progress.

STAFF REVIEW
The City provides animal control services seven days a week between the hours of 7:00 am and 6:00 pm, and partners with the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Los Angeles (SPCALA) 24 hours a day, seven days a week for kennel and animal housing services. The City does not have its own kennels and relies on the SPCA to house stray and abandoned animals that we bring to them so that they may be adopted out to good homes.

While the City and SPCA have had a long standing and mutually beneficial relationship, the City has observed a steady increase in fees each year, with this year contract increasing by $3,800 per month.

Additionally, charges such as late payment fees of ten percent, as well as a three hundred dollar a month penalty for any month in which more than 55 animals are deposited with SPCA. Most recently, the City was charged a $1,000 exotic animal fee when our officers recovered a pig at the 4500 block of 170 th
.

As a result of these increases in services costs, staff has begun looking for other options for kenneling services.

The unfortunate reality is that there are only a small number of agencies that do animal kenneling in the South Bay region. Some of those agencies are Southeast Area Animal Control Authority (SEEACA), Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control, Lovejoy Foundation, (non-profit organization), and SPCA. Currently all South Bay cities use one of these four agencies, and no agencies are currently accepting additional contracts.

Happily, the City currently has a limited partnership with the Los Angeles County Department of Animal Care and Control, and they have assured staff that when an opening in their organization arises, they have the City of Lawndale at the top of their list for new customers.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report and approves it as to form.

FISCAL REVIEW
There is no cost to the City as a result of this staff report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this staff report.

Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
Nick Petrevski, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Traffic Calming on 147th Street Update

BACKGROUND
The City received a concern from a resident regarding vehicles constantly speeding on 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue. 147th Street is an east-west arterial/collector road in the City of Lawndale, connecting residential neighborhoods, schools, and commercial areas. The concern was reviewed at a Traffic Committee meeting on January 19, 2023. The committee decided to move forward with a comprehensive traffic study to assess the current traffic conditions and determine the feasibility and necessity of any potential changes or recommendations.

Staff directed Advantec Consulting Engineers (Advantec), one of the City’s On-Call Traffic Engineers, to conduct a traffic study of 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue. The study aimed to assess current traffic conditions, including vehicle speeds, traffic volumes, and accident history, evaluate safety needs of pedestrians and cyclists and consider alternative traffic calming measures and their potential impact. The traffic study includes a summary of findings and proposed recommendations.

The City also received a concern from a resident regarding vehicles constantly speeding on 147th Street between Inglewood Avenue and Grevillea Avenue. Advantec provided a quote for an extensive traffic study of 147th Street between Inglewood Avenue and Grevillea Avenue for the amount of $23,156.00.

STAFF REVIEW
Staff received the traffic study results for 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue on August 13, 2024. The summary of analysis shows only 2.3% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit between Hawthorne Boulevard and Larch Avenue while only 0.34% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit between Larch Avenue and Prairie Ave. None of the project intersections had five or more collisions in the past 5 years. In addition, none of the intersections studied on 147th St. meet any of the requirements for a traffic signal.

Recommended improvements include installing additional pedestrian signs, road diet improvements by means of striping with bike lanes, traffic circle improvements, or curb bulb-out improvements.

In speaking to the On-Call Traffic Engineer prior to receiving the completed traffic report, the City had an opportunity to install some road diet options as part of the 2023-2024 Annual Striping Capital Improvement Project (CIP). The improvements on 147th St. consisted of the installation of continental crosswalks at the intersections of 147th Street and Freeman Avenue, 147th Street and Eastwood Avenue, and 147th Street and Osage Avenue., all completed in June, 2024. 147th Street and Larch Avenue, and 147th Street and Avis Avenue intersections already had existing continental crosswalks. The City received positive feedback from residents about the improvements, and no additional complaints of speeding cars on 147th St. have been received since the crosswalks have been installed.

The section of 147th Street from Condon Avenue to Grevillea Avenue was repaved and re-striped in August of 2024 as part of the FY 2022-23 Residential Street Rehabilitation CIP project. Continental crosswalks were also installed at the intersection of 147th Street and Mansel Avenue. The intersections of 147th Street and Inglewood Avenue, 147th Street and Condon Avenue, and 147th Street and Mansel Avenue already had existing continental crosswalks. Monies spent to install the continental crosswalks were funded by existing CIP projects, minimizing the fiscal impact of implementing a road diet by means of striping.

No additional complaints about speeding vehicles have been received since the new crosswalks have been installed. Staff recommends to not prepare an additional traffic report for 147th St.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The amount spent on the traffic study report for 147th Street from Hawthorne Boulevard to Prairie Avenue was $17,260. The preparation of a new Traffic Study for 147th Street between Inglewood Avenue and Grevillea Avenue would cost $23,156.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Receive and file the Traffic Study report provided by Advantec Consulting Engineers; or

2. Provide further direction to staff.

Attachments
A. Traffic Analysis prepared by Advantec Consulting Engineers.pdf Attachment A
City of Lawndale
147th Street Roadway Analysis Between
Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue (Draft)
Date: August 13, 2024
Prepared by:
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | i
Table of Contents
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iii List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ iii

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 3

2.1 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ....................................................................................................... 3

3. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 3

3.1 Roadway Description ..................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 Intersection Geometry and Control ............................................................................................... 3

3.3 Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................................. 9

3.4 Speed Data ................................................................................................................................... 10

3.5 Collision History ............................................................................................................................ 10

4. Speeding Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 11

5. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ............................................................................................................. 12

5.1 Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume ................................................................................... 12

5.2 Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume .................................................................................... 15

5.3 Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Vehicular Volume .................................................................................... 16

5.4 Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume ................................................................................................... 17

5.5 Warrant 5 – School Crossing ......................................................................................................... 18

5.6 Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System ....................................................................................... 18

5.7 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience ...................................................................................................... 19

5.8 Warrant 8 – Roadway Network .................................................................................................... 19

5.9 Warrant 9 – Intersection Near Grade Crossing ............................................................................ 19

5.10 Summary of Analysis and Results ............................................................................................... 19

6. Proposed Recommendations ............................................................................................................... 20

6.1 Summary of Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 20

6.2 Recommended Alternative Improvements .................................................................................. 20

6.2.1 General Improvements ....................................................................................................... 20

6.2.2 Alternative 1 Road Diet Improvements .............................................................................. 21

6.2.3 Alternative 2 Road Diet Improvements .............................................................................. 21

6.2.4 Alternative 3 Road Diet Improvements .............................................................................. 22

6.2.5 Alternative 4 Road Diet Improvements .............................................................................. 22

6.2.6 Traffic Circle Improvements ................................................................................................ 39

6.2.7 Bulb-Out Improvements ..................................................................................................... 40

6.2.8 Final Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 40 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | ii
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Limits .................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: 147th Street at Larch Avenue— Existing Intersection Geometry and Control .................................. 4 Figure 3: 147th Street at Freeman Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control ............................ 5 Figure 4: 147th Street at Eastwood Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control .......................... 6 Figure 5: 147th Street at Osage Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control ................................ 7 Figure 6: 147th Street at Avis Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control ................................... 8 Figure 7: Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume for 147th Street at Larch Ave ..................... 15 Figure 8: Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume for 147th Street at Avis Ave ....................... 15 Figure 9: Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Volume for 147th Street at Larch Avenue ............................... 16 Figure 10: Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Volume for 147th Street at Avis Avenue ............................... 16 Figure 11: Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume for 147th Street at Larch Avenue ........... 17 Figure 12: Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume for 147th Street at Avis Avenue ............. 18 Figure 13: Alternative 1 Improvements 1/4 .................................................................................................. 23 Figure 14: Alternative 1 Improvements 2/4 .................................................................................................. 24 Figure 15: Alternative 1 Improvements 3/4 .................................................................................................. 25 Figure 16: Alternative 1 Improvements 4/4 .................................................................................................. 26 Figure 17: Alternative 2 Improvements 1/4 .................................................................................................. 27 Figure 18: Alternative 2 Improvements 2/4 .................................................................................................. 28 Figure 19: Alternative 2 Improvements 3/4 .................................................................................................. 29 Figure 20: Alternative 2 Improvements 4/4 .................................................................................................. 30 Figure 21: Alternative 3 Improvements 1/4 .................................................................................................. 31 Figure 22: Alternative 3 Improvements 2/4 .................................................................................................. 32 Figure 23: Alternative 3 Improvements 3/4 .................................................................................................. 33 Figure 24: Alternative 3 Improvements 4/4 .................................................................................................. 34 Figure 25: Alternative 4 Improvements 1/4 .................................................................................................. 35 Figure 26: Alternative 4 Improvements 2/4 .................................................................................................. 36 Figure 27: Alternative 4 Improvements 3/4 .................................................................................................. 37 Figure 28: Alternative 4 Improvements 4/4 .................................................................................................. 38

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | iii
List of Tables
Table 1: ADT Volumes along 147th Street Between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue ..................... 9 Table 2: Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts ............................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Radar Speed Survey Results ............................................................................................................. 10 Table 4: Crash History .................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 5: Highest Traffic Volumes for Eight Hours for 147th Street at Larch Avenue ...................................... 12 Table 6: Highest Traffic Volumes for Eight Hours for 147th Street at Avis Avenue ........................................ 12 Table 7: Warrant 1; Condition A for 147th Street at Larch Avenue ................................................................ 13 Table 8: Warrant 1; Condition B for 147th Street at Larch Avenue ................................................................ 13 Table 9: Warrant 1; Condition A for 147th Street at Avis Avenue .................................................................. 14 Table 10: Warrant 1; Condition B for 147th Street at Avis Avenue ................................................................ 14 Table 11: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Volumes at 147th Street at Larch Avenue ............................................... 17 Table 12: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Volumes at 147th Street at Avis Avenue .................................................. 17 Table 13: Signal Warrant Analysis Summary ................................................................................................. 19 List of Appendices
Appendix A: CAMUTCD Warrant Methodologies
Appendix B: ADT Traffic Volumes
Appendix C: Peak-Hour Turning Movement Volumes
Appendix D: Speed Surveys
Appendix E: Collision History
Release Version:

Release Date Version Prepared by: Reviewed by:
8/13/2024 Draft Version 1 NP JAD

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 1

1. Introduction
ADVANTEC Consulting Engineers (ADVANTEC) was requested by the City of Lawndale to perform a Roadway Analysis at 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue (project corridor). The purpose of this Roadway Analysis is to analyze the existing conditions of the project corridor to enhance the safety and visibility of and for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians travelling on the project corridor. As part of the work, ADVANTEC conducted traffic signal warrant analyses at the intersections of 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue and safety analyses of the additional three intersections along 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue.

This report analyzes the corridor’s existing roadway layout, signage, striping, speeds, intersection control, traffic volumes, and collision history. This study also summarizes the results of the analysis and provides traffic calming alternatives and recommendations.

1.1 Study Area
The project intersections are located in the City of Lawndale in Los Angeles County. 147th Street runs eastwest and the adjacent land use is predominantly residential and commercial. Leuzinger High School is located north of the project vicinity. The project corridor consists of analyzing the following five (5) stopcontrolled intersections listed below.

1. 147th Street at Larch Avenue (School Crossing)

2. 147th Street at Freeman Avenue

3. 147th Street at Eastwood Avenue

4. 147th Street at Osage Avenue

5. 147th Street at Avis Avenue (School Crossing)
Figure 1 illustrates the project limits and locations of the study intersections.

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 2
Figure 1: Project Limits
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 3

2. Analysis Methodology

2.1 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
An engineering study of traffic conditions, pedestrian characteristics, and physical characteristics of the project intersections was performed to determine whether installation of a traffic control signal is justified at the intersections of 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue. The requirements set forth from the CAMUTCD 2014 edition was used to conduct the signal warrant analysis. There are nine (9) different traffic signal warrants per the CAMUTCD, and the installation of a traffic signal should be considered if one or more warrants are satisfied. The applicable sections and criteria per the CAMUTCD for the signal warrant analyses are provided in Appendix A. The following traffic signal warrant analysis sections of the CAMUTCD were evaluated:
 Section 4C.02 Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
 Section 4C.03 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
 Section 4C.04 Warrant 3, Peak Hour
 Section 4C.05 Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
 Section 4C.06 Warrant 5, School Crossing
 Section 4C.07 Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
 Section 4C.08 Warrant 7, Crash Experience
 Section 4C.09 Warrant 8, Roadway Network
 Section 4C.10 Warrant 9, Intersection Near Grade Crossing

3. Existing Conditions
This section presents an overview of the existing study intersections and the roadway characteristics, intersection control, traffic volumes, existing speed, and collision history. The following presents a detailed assessment of these characteristics.

3.1Roadway Description
147th Street is designated as a “Collector” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. This is an east-west fourlane undivided roadway with street parking allowed along the roadway segment. The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph) in both directions. This roadway connects Hawthorne Blvd and Prairie Ave, two major arterials.

3.2Intersection Geometry and Control
147th Street at Larch Avenue
147th Street at Larch Avenue is a four-legged intersection controlled by all-way stop signs. All four legs include yellow continental school crosswalks. Larch Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway and is classified as a “collector” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. This roadway is one of the primary roads that the community uses to access Leuzinger High School. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street along Larch Avenue. Figure 2Figure 2 illustrates the existing intersection geometry, and number of lanes along each roadway at this location.
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 4
Figure 2: 147th Street at Larch Avenue— Existing Intersection Geometry and Control

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 5
147th Street at Freeman Avenue
147th Street at Freeman Avenue is a four-legged intersection controlled by all-way stop signs. There are no marked crosswalks at any of the intersection legs. Freeman Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway and is classified as a “local street” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street along Freeman Avenue. Figure 3 illustrates the existing intersection geometry, and number of lanes along each roadway at this location.

Figure 3: 147th Street at Freeman Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 6
147th Street at Eastwood Avenue
147th Street at Eastwood Avenue is a four-legged intersection controlled by all-way stop signs. There are no marked crosswalks at any of the intersection legs. Eastwood Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway and is classified as a “local street” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street along Eastwood Avenue. Figure 4 illustrates the existing intersection geometry, and number of lanes along each roadway at this location.

Figure 4: 147th Street at Eastwood Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 7
147th Street at Osage Avenue
147th Street at Osage Avenue is a four-legged intersection controlled by all-way stop signs. There are no marked crosswalks at any of the intersection legs. Osage Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway and is classified as a “local street” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street along Freeman Avenue. Figure 5 illustrates the existing intersection geometry, and number of lanes along each roadway at this location.

Figure 5: 147th Street at Osage Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 8
147th Street at Avis Avenue
147th Street at Avis Avenue is a four-legged intersection controlled by all-way stop signs. All four legs include yellow continental school crosswalks. Avis Avenue is a two-lane north-south roadway and is classified as a “local street” in the City of Lawndale’s General Plan. This roadway is one of the primary roads that the community uses to access Leuzinger High School. Street parking is allowed on both sides of the street along Freeman Avenue. Figure 6 illustrates the existing intersection geometry, and number of lanes along each roadway at this location.

Figure 6: 147th Street at Avis Avenue — Existing Intersection Geometry and Control 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 9

3.3Traffic Volumes
Existing intersection traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle volumes are some of the primary factors used to determine if a traffic signal is warranted. Typically, the traffic volumes are collected on a representative day at the project intersection, such as a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, and include pedestrians and bicycle counts.

ADVANTEC collected average daily traffic (ADT) vehicle counts along the project corridor on Wednesday, April 24th, 2024. The weekday ADT traffic counts were collected for 24 continuous hours. The ADT counts along 147th Street are provided in Table 1. ADVANTEC also collected peak hour vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle volumes on Wednesday, April 24th, 2024, at the intersections of 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue. The peak hour turning movement volumes provided in Table 2. Detailed 24- hour traffic count data is contained in Appendix B. The peak hour turning movement volumes, pedestrian volumes, and bicycle volumes are contained in Appendix C.

Table 1: ADT Volumes along 147th Street Between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue Location
Posted
Speed Date
ADT Counts
EB WB Combined
147th St between Hawthorne Blvd and Larch Ave 35 mph April 24, 2024 1593 2180 3773 147th St between Larch Ave and Freeman Ave 35 mph April 24, 2024 1798 1894 3692 147th St between Freeman Ave and Osage Ave 35 mph April 24, 2024 1847 1891 3738 147th Street between Osage Ave and Avis Ave 35 mph April 24, 2024 1896 1829 3725 147th Street between Avis Ave and Prairie Ave 35 mph April 24, 2024 2440 1755 4195 Table 2: Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts
Date Peak
Hour
Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
Major
Street
(Total of
Both
Directions)
Minor
Street
(Highest
of Either
Direction) L T R L T R L T R L T R
147th Street at Larch Avenue
April
24,
2024
7:45
AM8:45
AM
20 116 13 9 288 35 22 34 4 39 59 52 481 150
April
24,
2024
3:00
PM4:00
PM
17 148 16 7 135 23 15 21 16 40 45 34 346 119
147th Street at Avis Avenue
April
24,
2024
7:45
AM8:45
AM
68 93 4 15 142 103 14 85 22 132 40 132 425 304
April
24,
2024
3:00
PM4:00
PM
31 163 13 21 107 41 9 28 38 95 38 59 376 192
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 10

3.4Speed Data
Existing vehicle speeds were surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples taken on the street segment represent a statistically significant sample of the current traffic. This data is essential to evaluate the distribution of speeds on a street segment.

A key element of this evaluation is identifying the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85% of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Speed limits are typically established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment per the 85th percentile speed.

Another valuable indicator for the speed conditions on a road segment is the 10-mph pace. The 10-mph pace is the range of speed at which the majority of vehicles are traveling on a particular stretch of road.

While the 85th percentile is the maximum speed that 85% of drivers will not exceed, the 10-mph pace is the range of speed at which those vehicles are actually moving.

The 24-hour speed data was collected on April 24, 2024, and is summarized in Table 3. The speed survey data is contained in Appendix D.

Table 3: Radar Speed Survey Results
Location 147th Street Between Hawthorne Boulevard and Larch Avenue Eastbound Westbound Combined
Number of Vehicles 1723 2255 3978
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph 35 mph -
85th Percentile Speed 31 mph 31 mph 31 mph
Average Speed 26 mph 26 mph 26 mph
10-mph Pace 21-30 mph 21-30 mph 21-30 mph
% In Pace 66.6% 68.3% 67.6%
Drivers Over Speed Limit (%) 40 (2.3%) 52 (2.3%) 92 (2.3%) Location 147th Street Between Eastwood Avenue and Prairie Avenue Eastbound Westbound Combined
Number of Vehicles 1932 1853 3785
Posted Speed Limit 35 mph 35 mph -
85th Percentile Speed 28 mph 24 mph 26 mph
Average Speed 24 mph 21 mph 22 mph
10-mph Pace 21-30 mph 16-25 mph 16-25 mph
% In Pace 78.5% 80.0% 71.0%
Drivers Over Speed Limit (%) 11 (0.57%) 2 (0.11%) 13 (0.34%)

3.5Collision History
The collision history was analyzed along 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue.

The collision history is typically analyzed three to five years from the present. Five-year collision history was 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 11
obtained from Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and is summarized in Table 4. The collision history data is contained in Appendix E. Based on the collision history, the project corridor has had 9 non-driving-under-the-influence (DUI) collisions within the past five years.

Table 4: Crash History

4. Speeding Analysis
The speed survey data summarized in Table 3 indicates that 85% of drivers along 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Larch Avenue are driving at 31 mph, which is under the posted speed limit (35 mph). The data also shows the majority of vehicles are driving at 21-30 mph at this segment, with the average speed being 26 mph. From the 3,978 vehicles that were surveyed, approximately 2.3% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit.

The data for the segment between Eastwood Avenue and Prairie Avenue shows that 85% of drivers are driving at 26 mph, which is under the posted speed limit (35 mph). The data also shows the majority of vehicles are driving at 16-25 mph at this segment, with the average speed being 22 mph. From the 3,785 vehicles that were surveyed, approximately 0.34% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit.

No. Intersection Date Time
Distance from
Intersection
(feet)
Direction Type of
Collision Cause
2019
1 Hawthorne
Blvd 03/14/19 11:30 290 East Veh/Ped Unsafe Lane Change 2 Freeman Ave 05/09/19 20:18 117 East Head-On Wrong Side of Road
3 Larch Ave 09/08/19 22:30 33 East Rear End Following too Closely
4 Osage Ave 09/25/19 18:35 4 North Other Traffic Signals and Signs
2020
5 Larch Ave 05/01/20 10:59 178 East Other Right-of-Way
6 Prairie Ave 06/20/20 14:00 0 - Broadside Traffic Signals and Signs
7 Eastwood Ave 07/01/20 06:41 115 South Rear End Improper Turning
8 Prairie Ave 12/10/20 15:55 3 South Veh/Ped Right-of-Way 2021
9 Eastwood Ave 03/20/21 17:05 168 South Other Unsafe
Starting
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 12

5. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
The City of Lawndale requested ADVANTEC to conduct signal warrant analyses along the 147th Street corridor between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue in the City of Lawndale. The study locations are listed below:
 147th Street at Larch Avenue
 147th Street at Avis Avenue

5.1 Warrant 1 – Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
Tables 5 and 6 summarize the highest traffic volumes per hour (for any eight hours) on the major street approach (total of both directions) and minor street approach (highest of both directions) at the intersections of 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue. These volumes will be used in our analysis. The eight-hour vehicular volume analysis for the study intersections is shown in Tables 7 to 10.

The tables also specify the amount of vehicular traffic that must be added before meeting the specific criteria for Warrant 1.

Table 5: Highest Traffic Volumes for Eight Hours for 147th Street at Larch Avenue # Hour EB WB Major St Approach
Vehicles (Combined) NB SB Minor St Approach Vehicles (Highest Approach) 1 7:00 AM 55 138 193 36 116 116
2 8:00 AM 159 301 460 63 138 138
3 1:00 PM 91 80 171 35 88 88
4 2:00 PM 143 150 293 41 129 129
5 3:00 PM 181 165 346 52 119 119
6 4:00 PM 133 124 257 53 105 105
7 5:00 PM 157 150 307 65 122 122
8 6:00 PM 120 107 227 66 131 131
Table 6: Highest Traffic Volumes for Eight Hours for 147th Street at Avis Avenue # Hour EB WB Major St Approach
Vehicles (Combined) NB SB Minor St Approach Vehicles (Highest Approach) 1 7:00 AM 67 53 120 59 69 69
2 8:00 AM 170 86 256 242 294 294
3 1:00 PM 90 111 201 34 42 42
4 2:00 PM 160 107 267 67 120 120
5 3:00 PM 207 203 410 100 192 192
6 4:00 PM 174 296 470 46 86 86
7 5:00 PM 173 227 400 63 94 94
8 6:00 PM 139 238 337 39 66 66
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 13
Table 7: Warrant 1; Condition A for 147th Street at Larch Avenue Condition A – Minimum
Vehicular Volume
Vehicles per hour on major street (total of
both approaches)
Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street
approach (one direction only)
100%a 80%b 100%a 80%b
Criteria (2 Lane Major,
1 Lane Minor) 600
%Increase
Required 480
%Increase
Required 150
%Increase
Required 120
%Increase
Required
7:00 AM 193 211% 193 149% 116 30% 116 4%
8:00 AM 460 31% 460 5% 138 9% 138 -
1:00 PM 171 251% 171 181% 88 71% 88 37%
2:00 PM 293 105% 293 64% 129 17% 129 -
3:00 PM 346 74% 346 39% 119 27% 119 1%
4:00 PM 257 134% 257 87% 105 43% 105 15%
5:00 PM 307 96% 307 57% 122 23% 122 -
6:00 PM 227 165% 227 112% 131 15% 131 -
a Basic minimum hourly volume
b Used for combination of Conditions A and B after adequate trial of other remedial measures Table 8: Warrant 1; Condition B for 147th Street at Larch Avenue Condition B –
Interruption of
Continuous
Vehicles per hour on major street (total of
both approaches)
Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street
approach (one direction only)
100%a 80%b 100%a 80%b
Criteria (2 Lane Major,
1 Lane Minor) 900
%Increase
Required 720
%Increase
Required 75
%Increase
Required 60
%Increase
Required
7:00 AM 193 367% 193 274% 116 - 116 -
8:00 AM 460 96% 460 57% 138 - 138 -
1:00 PM 171 427% 171 322% 88 - 88 -
2:00 PM 293 208% 293 146% 129 - 129 -
3:00 PM 346 161% 346 109% 119 - 119 -
4:00 PM 257 251% 257 181% 105 - 105 -
5:00 PM 307 194% 307 135% 122 - 122 -
6:00 PM 227 297% 227 218% 131 - 131 -
a Basic minimum hourly volume
b Used for combination of Conditions A and B after adequate trial of other remedial measures 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 14
Table 9: Warrant 1; Condition A for 147th Street at Avis Avenue Condition A – Minimum
Vehicular Volume
Vehicles per hour on major street (total of
both approaches)
Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street
approach (one direction only)
100%a 80%b 100%a 80%b
Criteria (2 Lane Major,
1 Lane Minor) 600
%Increase
Required 480
%Increase
Required 150
%Increase
Required 120
%Increase
Required
7:00 AM 120 400% 120 300% 69 118% 69 74%
8:00 AM 256 135% 256 88% 294 - 294 -
1:00 PM 201 199% 201 139% 42 258% 42 186%
2:00 PM 267 125% 267 80% 120 25% 120 0%
3:00 PM 410 47% 410 18% 192 - 192 -
4:00 PM 470 28% 470 3% 86 75% 86 40%
5:00 PM 400 50% 400 20% 94 60% 94 28%
6:00 PM 377 60% 377 28% 66 128% 66 82%
a Basic minimum hourly volume
b Used for combination of Conditions A and B after adequate trial of other remedial measures

Table 10: Warrant 1; Condition B for 147th Street at Avis Avenue Condition B –
Interruption of
Continuous
Vehicles per hour on major street (total of
both approaches)
Vehicles per hour on higher-volume minor-street
approach (one direction only)
100%a 80%b 100%a 80%b
Criteria (2 Lane Major,
1 Lane Minor) 900
%Increase
720
%Increase
75 %Increase
60 %Increase
7:00 AM 120 650% 120 500% 69 9% 69 -
8:00 AM 256 252% 256 182% 294 - 294 -
1:00 PM 201 348% 201 259% 42 79% 42 43%
2:00 PM 267 238% 267 170% 120 - 120 -
3:00 PM 410 120% 410 76% 192 - 192 -
4:00 PM 470 92% 470 54% 86 - 86 -
5:00 PM 400 125% 400 80% 94 - 94 -
6:00 PM 377 139% 377 91% 66 14% 66 -
a Basic minimum hourly volume
b Used for combination of Conditions A and B after adequate trial of other remedial measures

As shown in Tables 7 to 10, the criteria for Warrant 1 is not met for either Condition A or Condition B at either intersection.

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 15

5.2 Warrant 2 – Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
The four-hour vehicular volume analysis is shown in Figures 7 and 8. The four hours used for this analysis are the highest four hours in Tables 5 and 6. The figures also show the minimum volume to meet the criteria for Warrant 2.

Figure 7: Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume for 147th Street at Larch Ave Figure 8: Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume for 147th Street at Avis Ave As shown in Figures 7 and 8, the criteria for Warrant 2 is not met for either study intersection. (460,350)
(460, 138) (346,119)
(307,122)
(293,129)
(470,340)
(410,192)
(377,66)
(400,94)
(470,86)
LEGEND:
- Existing Volume at
147th Street at
Larch Avenue
- Minimum Volume
to meet Warrant
2 LEGEND:
- Existing Volume at
147th Street at
Avis Avenue
- Minimum Volume
to meet Warrant
2 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 16

5.3 Warrant 3 – Peak Hour Vehicular Volume
The peak-hour vehicular volume analysis is shown in Figures 9 and 10. The peak-hour volumes used for this analysis are provided in Table 2. The figures also show the minimum volume to meet the criteria for Warrant

3. Figure 9: Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Volume for 147th Street at Larch Avenue Figure 10: Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour Volume for 147th Street at Avis Avenue (510,510)
(481,150)
(510,510)
(425,304)
LEGEND:
- Existing Volume at 147th Street at Larch Avenue - Minimum Volume to meet Warrant 3 LEGEND:
- Existing Volume at 147th Street at Avis Avenue - Minimum Volume to meet Warrant 3 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 17
As shown in Figures 9 and 10, the criteria for Warrant 3 is not met for either study intersection.

5.4 Warrant 4 – Pedestrian Volume
Warrant 4 analyzes the pedestrian and bicyclist volumes crossing the major street. The highest combined pedestrian and bicyclist volumes in a single hour for both study intersections are provided in Tables 11 and

12. The peak-hour pedestrian volume analysis is shown in Figures 11 and 12. The figures also show the minimum volume to meet the criteria for Warrant 4.

Table 11: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Volumes at 147th Street at Larch Avenue Hour
147th Street Larch Avenue
Major Street
(Total of Both
Directions)
Xing Major Street West Leg East Leg North Leg South Leg Vehicular PeakHour Counts Combined
Volume Ped+Bike Ped+Bike Ped+Bike Ped+Bike
7:45 AM to
8:45 AM 481 46 14 7 33 13
Table 12: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Volumes at 147th Street at Avis Avenue Hour
147th Street Avis Avenue
Major Street
(Total of Both
Directions)
Xing Major Street West Leg East Leg North Leg South Leg Vehicular PeakHour Counts Combined
Volume Ped+Bike Ped+Bike Ped+Bike Ped+Bike
7:45 AM to
8:45 AM 425 81 34 17 65 16
Figure 11: Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume for 147th Street at Larch Avenue (481,590)
(481,46)
LEGEND:
- Existing Combined Pedestrian Volume at
147th Street at Larch Avenue - Minimum Volume to meet Warrant 4 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 18
Figure 12: Figure 4C-7. Warrant 4, Pedestrian Four-Hour Volume for 147th Street at Avis Avenue As shown in Figures 11 and 12, the criteria for Warrant 4 is not met for either study intersection.

5.5 Warrant 5 – School Crossing
Warrant 5 is for application in areas where school children cross the major roadway. The warrant is based on the number of gaps in the traffic stream and the number and size of the groups of children crossing the major roadway. A minimum of 20 students must cross the major roadway during a period in which the number of adequate crossing gaps is less than the number of minutes in the same period. 147th Street within the project area has school crossings at Larch Avenue and Avis Avenue. The intersection of Avis Avenue at 147th Street is within 300 feet of the signalized intersection of Prairie Avenue at 147th Street, which makes Warrant 5 inapplicable. For the intersection of Larch Avenue at 147th Street, based on the peak hour volumes, there are more adequate crossing gaps than the number of minutes in the same period. Warrant 5 states, “before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade-separated crossing.”

5.6 Warrant 6 – Coordinated Signal System
Warrant 6 applies in situations where installing a traffic signal is needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles along the primary corridor. The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominantly in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular platooning.

B. On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation.
(425,625)
(425,81)
LEGEND:
- Existing Combined Pedestrian Volume at
147th Street at Avis Avenue
- Minimum Volume to meet Warrant 4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 19
Since the Larch Avenue and Avis Avenue intersections are not contained in a coordinated traffic signal system and do not need to provide a necessary degree of vehicle platooning, it is determined that Warrant 6 is not applicable.

5.7 Warrant 7 – Crash Experience
Warrant 7 is satisfied if adequate countermeasures have been installed and have failed to reduce the crash frequency and five or more crashes susceptible to correction by a traffic signal have occurred within a 1- year period. Furthermore, for 8-hours of an average day, traffic volumes must exceed a minimum value determined primarily by the lane configuration of intersection approaches.

Fewer than five crashes have occurred within a 1-year period at both study intersections and therefore Warrant 7 is not met.

5.8 Warrant 8 – Roadway Network
Warrant 8 is applicable at intersections of two or more major routes. A major route is defined as being part of a street and/or highway system, and is a major route on an official city, county or state transportation plan.

Since the study intersections do not serve as a common intersection of two major routes, Warrant 8 is not applicable.

5.9 Warrant 9 – Intersection Near Grade Crossing
Warrant 9 is intended for use at a location where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Since there is not a nearby grade crossing near this intersection, Warrant 9 is not applicable.

5.10 Summary of Analysis and Results
The intersections of 147th Street/Larch Ave and 147th Street/Avis Ave were analyzed to determine if traffic signals would be warranted per 2014 edition MUTCD Section 4 Warrants 1 through 9. Based on the results of this analysis, the intersections do not meet the criteria to install traffic signals at this time. ADVANTEC recommends City staff to continue monitoring this intersection for potential increase in volumes (vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists).

Table 13 summarizes the results from the signal warrant analysis. An “No” indicates a warrant that was not satisfied.

Table 13: Signal Warrant Analysis Summary
Intersection Location Warrant Satisfied
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
147th Street at Larch
Avenue No No No No No No No No
147th Street at Avis
Avenue No No No No No No No No
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 20
As shown in Table 13, the intersections of 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue do not warrant traffic signal control.

6. Proposed Recommendations
Based on our analysis of existing conditions, traffic volumes, speed surveys, and collision history on 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue, this section provides recommended improvements to enhance the safety of motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists travelling through the corridor.

6.1 Summary of Analysis
The summary of the analysis and results are as follows for 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue:
 Speeding Analysis
o The 85th percentile speed along 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Larch Avenue is 31 mph, which is under the posted speed limit (35 mph). From the 3,978 vehicles that were surveyed, approximately 2.3% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit.
o The 85th percentile speed along 147th Street between Eastwood Avenue and Prairie Avenue is 26 mph, which is under the posted speed limit (35 mph). From the 3,785 vehicles that were surveyed, approximately 0.34% of drivers were traveling above the posted speed limit.  Collision History
o Nine collisions occurred along 147th Street between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue within the past 5 years. However, none of the project intersections had five or more collisions within the past 5 years.
 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
o 147th Street at Larch Avenue
 The intersection does not meet any of the 9 traffic signal warrant criteria. o 147th Street at Avis Avenue
 The intersection does not meet any of the 9 traffic signal warrant criteria.

6.2 Recommended Alternative Improvements
As summarized in Section 6.1, the 85th percentile speed for vehicles is under the posted speed limit of 35 mph, the project intersections do not have over 5 collisions within the past 5 years, and the project intersections with existing school crosswalks were found to not meet the traffic signal warrant criteria.

However, ADVANTEC recommends the following general improvements to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists along the study area. ADVANTEC has also prepared four alternative road diet striping improvements for the study area.

6.2.1 General Improvements
 Install SW24-3(CA) signs 200 feet east and west from the crosswalks at 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue.
 Install SW24-2(CA) signs at the east and west crosswalks at 147th Street at Larch Avenue and 147th Street at Avis Avenue.
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 21
 Install a SR4-1(CA) sign 300 feet west of the intersection of 147th Street at Larch Avenue for eastbound traffic.
 Install a SR4-1(CA) sign 200 feet east of the intersection of 147th Street at Avis Avenue for westbound traffic.
 Install yellow retroreflective continental crosswalks at the intersections of Freeman Avenue at 147th Street, Eastman Avenue at 147th Street, and Osage Avenue at 147th Street.

6.2.2 Alternative 1 Road Diet Improvements
The section summarizes Alternative 1 road diet improvements, which consists of a parking lane, a bike lane, a bike buffer zone, and one travel lane in each direction, along with a two-way left-turn lane. This would reduce the number of lanes along 147th Street from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane, while adding a bike lane and bike buffer zone. The cross-section for Alternative 1 is shown below.

The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figures 13 to 16.

6.2.3 Alternative 2 Road Diet Improvements
The section summarizes Alternative 2 road diet improvements, which consists of a parking lane, a buffer zone, a bike lane, an additional buffer zone, and one travel lane in each direction. This would reduce the number of lanes along 147th Street from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction, while adding a bike lane and bike buffer zone for moving vehicles and the parking lane. The cross-section for Alternative 2 is shown below.

The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figures 17 to 20. 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 22

6.2.4 Alternative 3 Road Diet Improvements
The section summarizes Alternative 3 road diet improvements, which consists of a parking lane, a buffer zone, a bike lane, an additional buffer zone, and one travel lane in each direction, along with a two-way leftturn lane. This would reduce the number of lanes along 147th Street from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction with a two-way left-turn lane, while adding a bike lane and bike buffer zone for moving vehicles and the parking lane. The cross-section for Alternative 3 is shown below.

The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figures 21 to 24.

6.2.5 Alternative 4 Road Diet Improvements
The section summarizes Alternative 4 road diet improvements, which consists of an outer bike lane, a buffer zone, a parking lane, an additional buffer zone, and one travel lane in each direction. This would reduce the number of lanes along 147th Street from two lanes in each direction to one lane in each direction, while adding an outer bike lane and bike buffer zone for moving vehicles and the parking lane. The cross-section for Alternative 4 is shown below.

The recommended improvements are illustrated in Figures 25 to 28. 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 23
Figure 13: Alternative 1 Improvements 1/4

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 24
Figure 14: Alternative 1 Improvements 2/4

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 25
Figure 15: Alternative 1 Improvements 3/4

147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 26
Figure 16: Alternative 1 Improvements 4/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 27
Figure 17: Alternative 2 Improvements 1/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 28
Figure 18: Alternative 2 Improvements 2/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 29
Figure 19: Alternative 2 Improvements 3/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 30
Figure 20: Alternative 2 Improvements 4/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 31
Figure 21: Alternative 3 Improvements 1/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 32
Figure 22: Alternative 3 Improvements 2/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 33
Figure 23: Alternative 3 Improvements 3/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 34
Figure 24: Alternative 3 Improvements 4/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 35
Figure 25: Alternative 4 Improvements 1/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 36
Figure 26: Alternative 4 Improvements 2/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 37
Figure 27: Alternative 4 Improvements 3/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 38
Figure 28: Alternative 4 Improvements 4/4
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 39

6.2.6 Traffic Circle Improvements
In addition to the road diet alternative
improvements, traffic circle intersection
design may be incorporated at the
intersections along the project corridor.

Traffic circles lower speeds at minor
intersection crossings and are an ideal
treatment for uncontrolled intersections.

Traffic circles would eliminate left-turning
movement conflicts at the intersection by
creating a flow of counter-clockwise
movement. Trafic circles are
recommended for roadways with a
posted speed limit of 35 mph or lower,
with ADT volumes of 7,500 vehicles or
lower, which applies to the project
corridor. Implementation of a traffic circle
would require road diet striping with one through in each direction only, due to physical constraints of the intersection dimensions.

The potential locations to consider traffic circle improvements include:
 Alternative 2
o Larch Avenue at 147th Street
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
o Avis Avenue at 147th Street
 Alternative 4
o Larch Avenue at 147th Street
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
o Avis Avenue at 147th Street
 Alternative 2
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
 Alternative 4
or
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
or
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 40
Bulb-Out Improvements
Bulb-outs may also be incorporated into the road diet
alternative improvements. Bulb-outs visually and physically narrow the roadway, creating safer and shorter crossings for pedestrians. Bulb-outs are recommended for roadways with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or lower, with ADT volumes of 20,000 vehicles or lower, which allies to the project corridor. Bulb-outs would be applicable for road diet
improvements or the existing striping conditions where the parking lane is adjacent to the curb.

The potential locations to consider bulb-out improvements include:
 Alternative 1 (along 147th Street)
o Larch Avenue at 147th Street
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
o Avis Avenue at 147th Street
 Alternative 2 (along 147th Street)
o Larch Avenue at 147th Street
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
o Avis Avenue at 147th Street
 Alternative 3 (along 147th Street)
o Larch Avenue at 147th Street
o Freeman Avenue at 147th Street
o Eastman Avenue at 147th Street
o Osage Avenue at 147th Street
o Avis Avenue at 147th Street

6.2.7 Final Recommendations
The four road diet alternatives are all similar improvements that would reduce the number of lanes, add a bike lane, and add parking lane striping in each direction. Based on our evaluation for the four alternatives, it is recommended to select Alternatives 1 or 2, depending on if the City would prefer a two-way left-turn lane.

Bulb-out improvements are recommended at each intersection within the project corridor and may be implemented with both Alternative road diet improvements at crosswalks crossing 147th Street.

The costs for implementing the road diet alternatives would be approximately the same, as they are all signing and striping related improvements. If the City decides to implement bulb-out improvements, the costs would rise.
147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale
Page | 41
If the City would like to consider a phased implementation, it is recommended to install the signing and striping as "Phase 1" improvements, and construction of the bulb-outs as "Phase 2" improvements. The cost for Phase 2 improvements will be considerably higher than Phase 1 improvements. As another option, the City may also consider constructing bulb-outs at selected locations. ADVANTEC recommends the City to implement these improvements based on their resources and available funding including the costs to procure and install the recommended improvements shown. 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale

APPENDIX A

CAMUTCD WARRANT METHODOLOGIES
Section 4C.02 Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
01The Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. 02The Interruption of Continuous Traffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satisfied and where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street. 03It is intended that Warrant 1 be treated as a single warrant. If Condition A is satisfied, then Warrant 1 is satisfied and analyses of Condition B and the combination of Conditions A and B are not needed.

Similarly, if Condition B is satisfied, then Warrant 1 is satisfied and an analysis of the combination of Conditions A and B is not needed.

Standard:
04The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; or
B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

In applying each condition the major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours.

On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours.

Option:
05If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 70 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 100 percent columns.

Guidance:
06The combination of Conditions A and B is intended for application at locations where Condition A is not satisfied and Condition B is not satisfied and should be applied only after an adequate trial of other alternatives that could cause less delay and inconvenience to traffic has failed to solve the traffic problems.

Standard:
07The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day:

A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; and
B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection.

These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours for each condition; however, the 8 hours satisfied in Condition A shall not be required to be the same 8 hours satisfied in Condition B. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

Option:
08If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns.

Section 4C.03 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume
Support:
01The Four-Hour Vehicular Volume signal warrant conditions are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
02The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach lanes. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 4 hours.

Option:
03If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-2 may be used in place of Figure 4C-1.

Section 4C.04 Warrant 3, Peak Hour
Support:
01The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic conditions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street.

Standard:
02This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time.
03The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met:

A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15- minute periods) of an average day:

1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a onelane approach or 5 vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach; and

2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes; and

3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches.

B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes.

Option:
04If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-4 may be used in place of Figure 4C-3 to evaluate the criteria in the second category of the Standard.
05If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal may be operated in the flashing mode during the hours that the volume criteria of this warrant are not met.

Guidance:
06If this warrant is the only warrant met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal should be traffic-actuated.

Section 4C.05 Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume
Support:
01The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street.

Standard:
02The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

A. For each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) all fall above the curve in Figure 4C-5; or B. For 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding pedestrians per hour crossing the major street (total of all crossings) falls above the curve in Figure 4C-7.

Option:
03If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 35 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, Figure 4C-6 may be used in place of Figure 4C-5 to evaluate Criterion A in Paragraph 2, and Figure 4C-8 may be used in place of Figure 4C-7 to evaluate Criterion B in Paragraph 2.

Standard:
04The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal or STOP sign controlling the street that pedestrians desire to cross is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.
05If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, the traffic control signal shall be equipped with pedestrian signal heads complying with the provisions set forth in Chapter 4E.

Guidance:
06If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

A. If it is installed at an intersection or major driveway location, the traffic control signal should also control the minor-street or driveway traffic, should be traffic-actuated, and should include pedestrian detection.

B. If it is installed at a non-intersection crossing, the traffic control signal should be installed at least 100 feet from side streets or driveways that are controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, and should be pedestrian-actuated. If the traffic control signal is installed at a non-intersection crossing, at least one of the signal faces should be over the traveled way for each approach, parking and other sight obstructions should be prohibited for at least 100 feet in advance of and at least 20 feet beyond the crosswalk or site accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings.

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Option:
07The criterion for the pedestrian volume crossing the major street may be reduced as much as 50 percent if the 15th-percentile crossing speed of pedestrians is less than 3.5 feet per second. 08A traffic control signal may not be needed at the study location if adjacent coordinated traffic control signals consistently provide gaps of adequate length for pedestrians to cross the street.

Section 4C.06 Warrant 5, School Crossing
Support:
01 The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that schoolchildren cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal. For the purposes of this warrant, the word “schoolchildren” includes elementary through high school students.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of schoolchildren at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the schoolchildren are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period (see Section 7A.03) and there are a minimum of 20 schoolchildren during the highest crossing hour.
03 Before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade-separated crossing.
04 The School Crossing signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 300 feet, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.

Guidance:
05 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal is justified by an engineering study, then:

If the traffic control signal is installed at a non-intersection crossing, at least one of the signal faces should be over the traveled way for each approach, parking and other sight obstructions should be
prohibited for at least 100 feet in advance of and at least 20 feet beyond the crosswalk or site accommodations should be made through curb extensions or other techniques to provide adequate sight
distance, and the installation should include suitable standard signs and pavement markings.

C. Furthermore, if it is installed within a signal system, the traffic control signal should be coordinated.

Section 4C.07 Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System
Support:
01 Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following criteria is met:

Guidance:
03 The Coordinated Signal System signal warrant should not be applied where the resultant spacing of traffic control signals would be less than 1,000 feet.

Section 4C.08 Warrant 7, Crash Experience
Support:
01 The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met:

A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and
B. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 (see Section 4C.02), or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the highervolume minor-street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours.

Option:
03 If the posted or statutory speed limit or the 85th-percentile speed on the major street exceeds 40 mph, or if the intersection lies within the built-up area of an isolated community having a population of less than 10,000, the traffic volumes in the 56 percent columns in Table 4C-1 may be used in place of the 80 percent columns.

Section 4C.09 Warrant 8, Roadway Network
Support
01 Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flow on a roadway network.

Standard:
02 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria:

A. The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5-year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday; or
B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours of a non-normal business day (Saturday or Sunday).
03 A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have at least one of the following characteristics:

A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow.

B. It includes rural or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a city.

C. It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study.

Section 4C.10 Warrant 9, Intersection Near a Grade Crossing Support
01 The Intersection Near a Grade Crossing signal warrant is intended for use at a location where none of the conditions described in the other eight traffic signal warrants are met, but the proximity to the intersection of a grade crossing on an intersection approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic control signal.

Guidance:
02 This signal warrant should be applied only after adequate consideration has been given to other alternatives or after a trial of an alternative has failed to alleviate the safety concerns associated with the grade crossing. Among the alternatives that should be considered or tried are:

A. Providing additional pavement that would enable vehicles to clear the track or that would provide space for an evasive maneuver, or
B. Reassigning the stop controls at the intersection to make the approach across the track a nonstopping approach.

Standard:
03 The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met:

A. A grade crossing exists on an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign and the center of the track nearest to the intersection is within 140 feet of the stop line or yield line on the approach; and
B. During the highest traffic volume hour during which rail traffic uses the crossing, the plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach that crosses the track (one direction only, approaching the intersection) falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10 for the existing combination of approach lanes over the track and the distance D, which is the clear storage distance as defined in Section 1A.13.

Guidance:
04 The following considerations apply when plotting the traffic volume data on Figure 4C-9 or 4C-10:

A. Figure 4C-9 should be used if there is only one lane approaching the intersection at the track crossing location and Figure 4C-10 should be used if there are two or more lanes approaching the intersection at the track crossing location.

B. After determining the actual distance D, the curve for the distance D that is nearest to the actual distance D should be used. For example, if the actual distance D is 95 feet, the plotted point should be compared to the curve for D = 90 feet.

C. If the rail traffic arrival times are unknown, the highest traffic volume hour of the day should be used.

Option:
05 The minor-street approach volume may be multiplied by up to three adjustment factors as provided in Paragraphs 6 through 8.
06 Because the curves are based on an average of four occurrences of rail traffic per day, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-2 for the appropriate number of occurrences of rail traffic per day. 07 Because the curves are based on typical vehicle occupancy, if at least 2% of the vehicles crossing the track
are buses carrying at least 20 people, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-3 for the appropriate percentage of highoccupancy buses. 08 Because the curves are based on tractor-trailer trucks comprising 10% of the vehicles crossing the track, the vehicles per hour on the minor-street approach may be multiplied by the adjustment factor shown in Table 4C-4 for the appropriate distance and percentage of tractor-trailer trucks.

Standard:
09 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, then:

A. The traffic control signal shall have actuation on the minor street; B. Preemption control shall be provided in accordance with Sections 4D.27, 8C.09, and 8C.10; and
C. The grade crossing shall have flashing-light signals (see Chapter 8C).

Guidance:
10 If this warrant is met and a traffic control signal at the intersection is justified by an engineering study, the grade crossing should have automatic gates (see Chapter 8C). 147th Street Roadway Analysis between Hawthorne Boulevard and Prairie Avenue City of Lawndale

APPENDIX B

ADT TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Page 1 ends

City of Lawndale
Larch Avenue
N/ 147th Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
LND001
Site Code: 141-24363
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 4/24/2024 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 1 11 5 19
12:15 0 11 4 12
12:30 1 14 4 17
12:45 1 9 3 45 3 26 16 74 19 119
01:00 0 12 2 10
01:15 2 7 2 26
01:30 1 15 2 27
01:45 1 11 4 45 2 25 8 88 12 133
02:00 0 18 2 31
02:15 1 15 0 35
02:30 2 21 0 33
02:45 0 9 3 63 1 30 3 129 6 192
03:00 0 17 0 27
03:15 1 17 2 29
03:30 1 9 0 32
03:45 3 18 5 61 2 31 4 119 9 180
04:00 1 18 0 21
04:15 1 15 2 31
04:30 3 22 2 21
04:45 2 21 7 76 2 32 6 105 13 181
05:00 2 26 0 37
05:15 2 17 4 28
05:30 0 10 4 23
05:45 3 20 7 73 6 34 14 122 21 195
06:00 1 16 4 49
06:15 4 18 6 33
06:30 6 16 14 31
06:45 6 11 17 61 14 18 38 131 55 192
07:00 6 16 18 32
07:15 7 10 35 29
07:30 9 12 30 24
07:45 14 8 36 46 33 12 116 97 152 143
08:00 23 4 43 21
08:15 35 11 38 19
08:30 17 12 36 19
08:45 21 16 96 43 21 8 138 67 234 110
09:00 13 10 13 11
09:15 3 2 23 10
09:30 7 8 19 12
09:45 6 6 29 26 18 14 73 47 102 73
10:00 6 1 18 7
10:15 7 5 14 4
10:30 11 6 22 9
10:45 10 2 34 14 9 11 63 31 97 45
11:00 8 3 10 5
11:15 4 3 9 7
11:30 9 4 14 3
11:45 4 2 25 12 27 5 60 20 85 32
Total 266 565 266 565 539 1030 539 1030 805 1595
Combined
Total 831 831 1569 1569 2400
AM Peak - 08:00 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 96 - - - 150 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.686 0.872
PM Peak - - 04:30 - - - 05:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 86 - - - 147 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.827 0.750
Percentag
e

32.0% 68.0% 34.4% 65.6%
ADT/AADT ADT 2,400 AADT 2,400

Page 1 ends

City of Lawndale
Larch Avenue
S/ 147th Street
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
LND002
Site Code: 141-24363
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 4/24/2024 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 12 1 8
12:15 0 6 3 11
12:30 0 7 3 14
12:45 0 8 0 33 3 20 10 53 10 86
01:00 0 9 1 8
01:15 1 5 2 17
01:30 2 10 2 17
01:45 0 11 3 35 1 11 6 53 9 88
02:00 1 13 0 21
02:15 1 12 0 13
02:30 1 10 2 16
02:45 0 6 3 41 1 18 3 68 6 109
03:00 0 14 0 14
03:15 0 13 1 17
03:30 0 10 0 19
03:45 2 15 2 52 1 18 2 68 4 120
04:00 0 11 1 11
04:15 0 12 0 17
04:30 2 15 2 5
04:45 1 15 3 53 1 16 4 49 7 102
05:00 1 19 0 19
05:15 2 18 2 19
05:30 0 10 4 14
05:45 3 18 6 65 5 19 11 71 17 136
06:00 0 13 3 28
06:15 2 21 3 15
06:30 3 19 4 22
06:45 3 13 8 66 7 9 17 74 25 140
07:00 10 14 9 16
07:15 6 10 23 14
07:30 9 11 14 13
07:45 11 5 36 40 16 11 62 54 98 94
08:00 16 3 23 14
08:15 24 8 18 13
08:30 9 16 24 13
08:45 14 16 63 43 10 8 75 48 138 91
09:00 10 10 7 6
09:15 1 5 15 8
09:30 4 5 13 10
09:45 5 1 20 21 8 5 43 29 63 50
10:00 7 0 11 4
10:15 3 4 9 4
10:30 9 4 17 3
10:45 14 2 33 10 11 4 48 15 81 25
11:00 14 0 15 1
11:15 3 1 6 4
11:30 8 0 10 1
11:45 6 3 31 4 14 4 45 10 76 14
Total 208 463 208 463 326 592 326 592 534 1055
Combined
Total 671 671 918 918 1589
AM Peak - 08:00 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 63 - - - 81 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.656 0.844
PM Peak - - 05:45 - - - 05:45 - - - -
Vol. - - 71 - - - 84 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.845 0.750
Percentag
e

31.0% 69.0% 35.5% 64.5%
ADT/AADT ADT 1,589 AADT 1,589

Page 1 ends

City of Lawndale
147th Street
E/ Larch Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
LND003
Site Code: 141-24363
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 4/24/2024 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 28 4 17
12:15 0 12 2 24
12:30 1 21 2 23
12:45 1 26 4 87 2 32 10 96 14 183
01:00 0 25 0 20
01:15 1 26 0 19
01:30 0 21 1 16
01:45 2 19 3 91 2 25 3 80 6 171
02:00 2 30 1 26
02:15 0 39 0 43
02:30 1 43 3 49
02:45 0 40 3 152 1 32 5 150 8 302
03:00 0 41 1 29
03:15 1 48 1 48
03:30 2 65 1 53
03:45 1 50 4 204 2 35 5 165 9 369
04:00 0 37 3 30
04:15 3 44 2 35
04:30 1 44 4 31
04:45 2 43 6 168 4 28 13 124 19 292
05:00 3 44 7 43
05:15 1 45 4 41
05:30 3 42 5 31
05:45 2 56 9 187 11 35 27 150 36 337
06:00 2 47 7 29
06:15 6 45 10 33
06:30 4 35 15 23
06:45 7 23 19 150 21 22 53 107 72 257
07:00 9 28 19 20
07:15 12 27 29 24
07:30 22 22 27 19
07:45 23 18 66 95 63 15 138 78 204 173
08:00 42 19 96 10
08:15 46 16 92 11
08:30 48 23 81 8
08:45 30 14 166 72 32 12 301 41 467 113
09:00 11 13 25 11
09:15 12 16 16 9
09:30 15 17 31 10
09:45 19 9 57 55 23 8 95 38 152 93
10:00 16 10 18 12
10:15 14 7 24 7
10:30 21 9 24 3
10:45 18 10 69 36 25 3 91 25 160 61
11:00 26 5 23 2
11:15 13 5 22 2
11:30 10 5 22 5
11:45 19 12 68 27 14 9 81 18 149 45
Total 474 1324 474 1324 822 1072 822 1072 1296 2396
Combined
Total 1798 1798 1894 1894 3692
AM Peak - 08:00 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 166 - - - 332 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.865 0.865
PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 03:15 - - - -
Vol. - - 204 - - - 166 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.785 0.783
Percentag
e

26.4% 73.6% 43.4% 56.6%
ADT/AADT ADT 3,692 AADT 3,692

Page 1 ends

City of Lawndale
147th Street
W/ Larch Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
LND004
Site Code: 141-24363
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 4/24/2024 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 17 5 18
12:15 0 15 3 23
12:30 0 17 1 15
12:45 0 26 0 75 0 37 9 93 9 168
01:00 0 26 1 20
01:15 2 28 0 28
01:30 0 20 2 20
01:45 3 17 5 91 3 37 6 105 11 196
02:00 0 32 2 33
02:15 0 31 0 54
02:30 1 43 0 55
02:45 1 37 2 143 2 38 4 180 6 323
03:00 0 35 1 33
03:15 1 40 1 48
03:30 2 57 0 59
03:45 0 49 3 181 1 44 3 184 6 365
04:00 1 30 2 26
04:15 1 29 1 31
04:30 2 39 4 35
04:45 2 35 6 133 4 30 11 122 17 255
05:00 2 34 5 44
05:15 2 37 7 43
05:30 2 37 4 35
05:45 1 49 7 157 11 41 27 163 34 320
06:00 1 38 6 38
06:15 6 33 11 42
06:30 5 29 23 29
06:45 6 20 18 120 24 30 64 139 82 259
07:00 7 26 30 32
07:15 11 17 39 29
07:30 19 18 40 25
07:45 18 14 55 75 72 9 181 95 236 170
08:00 38 18 105 15
08:15 49 17 104 15
08:30 44 22 81 17
08:45 28 15 159 72 34 13 324 60 483 132
09:00 11 11 28 14
09:15 13 14 23 12
09:30 10 20 29 12
09:45 15 9 49 54 28 12 108 50 157 104
10:00 8 9 18 13
10:15 16 8 27 7
10:30 21 5 27 3
10:45 17 5 62 27 26 5 98 28 160 55
11:00 33 4 31 2
11:15 12 5 23 3
11:30 14 5 29 3
11:45 16 10 75 24 26 9 109 17 184 41
Total 441 1152 441 1152 944 1236 944 1236 1385 2388
Combined
Total 1593 1593 2180 2180 3773
AM Peak - 08:00 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 159 - - - 362 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.811 0.862
PM Peak - - 03:00 - - - 03:00 - - - -
Vol. - - 181 - - - 184 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.794 0.780
Percentag
e

27.7% 72.3% 43.3% 56.7%
ADT/AADT ADT 3,773 AADT 3,773

Page 1 ends

City of Lawndale
147th Street
B/ Freeman Avenue - Osage Aveue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
LND009
Site Code: 141-24363
Counts Unimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
email: [email protected]
Start 4/24/24 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Wed Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 26 1 17
12:15 0 16 2 23
12:30 1 22 2 23
12:45 5 27 8 91 2 28 7 91 15 182
01:00 3 24 2 19
01:15 2 26 0 22
01:30 3 18 2 18
01:45 4 23 12 91 2 25 6 84 18 175
02:00 1 31 1 28
02:15 0 40 1 47
02:30 2 46 0 44
02:45 3 41 6 158 1 30 3 149 9 307
03:00 0 42 0 33
03:15 1 54 1 44
03:30 1 62 2 53
03:45 0 49 2 207 0 41 3 171 5 378
04:00 4 43 1 32
04:15 0 44 2 36
04:30 3 46 2 32
04:45 1 39 8 172 2 27 7 127 15 299
05:00 1 48 1 35
05:15 5 37 3 42
05:30 5 48 9 36
05:45 9 48 20 181 7 33 20 146 40 327
06:00 4 42 5 30
06:15 7 46 12 35
06:30 6 36 12 26
06:45 8 22 25 146 28 22 57 113 82 259
07:00 8 28 14 25
07:15 9 24 23 22
07:30 14 22 28 23
07:45 27 22 58 96 67 15 132 85 190 181
08:00 43 17 90 17
08:15 49 17 88 14
08:30 33 21 72 9
08:45 23 17 148 72 32 12 282 52 430 124
09:00 17 15 21 15
09:15 14 20 17 13
09:30 23 18 26 12
09:45 18 12 72 65 23 9 87 49 159 114
10:00 17 12 18 11
10:15 16 6 21 7
10:30 22 9 20 6
10:45 20 9 75 36 22 4 81 28 156 64
11:00 24 7 23 6
11:15 15 7 25 7
11:30 14 4 24 6
11:45 20 7 73 25 13 7 85 26 158 51
Total 507 1340 507 1340 770 1121 770 1121 1277 2461
Combined
Total 1847 1847 1891 1891 3738
AM Peak - 07:45 - - - 07:45 - - - - -
Vol. - 152 - - - 317 - - - - -
P.H.F. 0.776 0.881
PM Peak - - 03:15 - - - 03:00 - - - -
Vol. - - 208 - - - 171 - - - -
P.H.F. 0.839 0.807
Percentag
e

27.4% 72.6% 40.7% 59.3%
ADT/AADT ADT 3,738 AADT 3,738

Page 1 ends

Lawndale City CouncilNovember 18, 2024

Lawndale City Council
November 18, 2024