Agenda packet — Lawndale City Council, February 3, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF LAWNDALE

AGENDA OF THE LAWNDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Monday, February 3, 2025, 6:30 PM
Council Chambers
14717 Burin Ave
Lawndale, CA 90260
Any person who wishes to address the City Council regarding any item listed on this agenda or any other matter that is within its subject matter jurisdiction is invited, but not required, to fill out a Public Meeting Speaker Card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the oral communications portion of the meeting. The purpose of the card is to ensure that the speaker’s name is correctly recorded in the meeting minutes and, where appropriate, to provide contact information for staff follow-up.

How to observe the Meeting:

To maximize public safety while still maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public can now observe the meeting in person. Members of the public are still be able to view the meeting on YouTube “Lawndale CityTV”, the City Website, and Lawndale Community Cable Television on Spectrum and Frontier Channel 3.

Copies of this Agenda may be obtained prior to the meeting inside the Lawndale City Hall foyer or on the City Website. Interested parties may contact the City Clerk Department at (310) 973-3213 for clarification regarding individual agenda items.

This Agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours before the meeting.

A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
B. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
C. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update

2. Los Angeles County Fire Department Update
D. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) E. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items F.3 through F.5 will be considered and acted upon under one motion unless a City Councilmember removes individual items for further City Council consideration or explanation.

3. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda — Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

4. Accounts Payable Register
— Recommendation: that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2502-007 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $901,800.42.

5. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting - January 21, 2025 — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes.

G. PUBLIC HEARING

6. Introduction of Ordinance No. 1208-25 to Amend Title 17 of the Lawndale Municipal Code to Update the City's Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations In Compliance with State Laws — Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Conduct a public hearing; 2.) Determine that the Ordinance No. 1208-25 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and 3.) Introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 1208-25, an Ordinance amending the Lawndale Municipal Code regarding Accessory Dwelling Units to reflect recent changes in state law, and waive further reading.

H. ADMINISTRATION

7. Approval of the Youth Development Center and Skatepark Conceptual Design — Recommendation: that the City Council review and approve the proposed Conceptual Design for the Youth Development Center and Skatepark (Attachment C) and affirm the Categorical Exemptions and Categorical Exclusion.

8. Emergency Alert Registration Process
— Recommendation: that City Council receive and file this report.

9. Solar LED Blinking Stop Signs
— Recommendation: that the City Council review the information contained in this report, discuss, and provide direction to staff for future implementation of these devices.

10. Regional Early Action Plan 2 Grant - Program Objectives Discussion — Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Discuss the REAP 2.0 Grant Program; 2.) Direct staff to communicate to the Executive Director of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments that the City at this time is not interested in participating in the REAP 2.0 Grant Program; or 3.) Direct staff to communicate to the Executive Director of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments that the City is interested in participating in the REAP 2.0 Grant Program; or 4.) Provide further direction to staff.

11. Approve the Disposal of Two Vehicles, One Air Compressor, and One Traffic Message Board — -Recommendation: that the City Council approve the sale of two vehicles, one air compressor, and one traffic message board through the City’s standard public auction process facilitated by Ken Porter Auctions in Carson, California.

12. Discussion of the Existing Software Used by City Departments — Recommendation: that the City Council provide City Staff with direction.

13. Consideration of Professional Legislative Lobbyist Services RFP — Recommendation: that City Council: 1) review the Request for Proposals (RFP) received from the responding firms and provide further direction to staff to proceed with a selection process for lobbying services, which may include establishing a selection committee; or 2) provide other direction to staff as appropriate.

14. Purchasing Policy Reorganization and Amendment to Authorize City Manager Purchases in Specified Situations — Recommendation: that the City Council review the proposed changes and adopt Resolution No. CC-2409-095 making the changes to the purchasing policy.

15. Approval of Senior Citizen Advisory Committee Resolution — Recommendation: that the City Council approve Resolution No. CC 2502-008 modifying Council Policy 94-09 by reducing the number of appointed positions from twelve (12) to seven (7) for the Senior Citizen Advisory Committee.

I. CITY MANAGER REPORT
J. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

16. Consideration of Compensation Increase for City Clerk Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Kearney.
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1) review and discuss this report regarding the City Clerk compensation; and 2) discuss and provide direction to staff regarding the total monthly compensation amount to be added to the draft ordinance amending Chapter 2.16 of the Lawndale Municipal Code regarding compensation for the City Clerk; or 3) provide other direction to the City Manager and staff.

17. Code Enforcement Process
Requested by Councilmember Suarez.
— Recommendation: that City Council receive and file this staff report.

18. Consideration and Direction Regarding Funding for Bus Transportation Requested by Councilmember Cuevas and Councilmember Suarez. — Recommendation: that the City Council: 1) review and discuss this item; 2) authorize and direct the Director of Finance/City Treasurer to appropriate $6,200 from the General Fund to account number 100-160-530.100 Contract Services to fund bus transportation for Lawndale residents attending the Metro C Line (Green) Project meeting; OR 2) provide other direction to the City Manager and staff, if any.

19. Report of Attendance at Meetings
K. CLOSED SESSION

20. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation — The City Council will conduct a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), to discuss existing litigation: Name of Case: City of Lawndale v. LA Investment, LLC (LA Superior Court Case No. 20TRCV00065).

21. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation — The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4), to discuss the potential initiation of litigation: one (1) case.

L. ADJOURNMENT
The regular meeting scheduled to be held on February 17, 2025 was canceled by order of the City Council on November 4, 2024. The next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 18, 2025, in the Lawndale City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

It is the intention of the City of Lawndale to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, we will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the City Clerk Department (310) 973-3213 prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodation to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held on February 3, 2025, was posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
/s/ Yvette Palomo
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Date Posted: January 30, 2025

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT:

Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda

BACKGROUND
California Government Code reads, in part, as follows:
"Except when, after reading the title, further reading is waived by regular motion adopted by majority vote, all ordinances shall be read in full either at the time of introduction or passage."

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Hrant Manuelian, Finance Director/City Treasurer SUBJECT: Accounts Payable Register

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2502-007 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $901,800.42.

Attachments
A. CC-2502-007 - AP Resolution - Feb. 3, 2025.pdf

Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting - January 21, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the minutes.

Attachments
City Council Regular Meeting-01-22-2025-minutesDraft.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

DRAFT MINUTES
City Council Regular Meeting
January 21, 2025
A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tem Kearney called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

Councilmembers Present: Mayor Pro Tem Kearney, Councilmember Bernadette Suarez, Councilmember Frank M. Talavera
Councilmembers Absent: Mayor Robert Pullen-Miles, Councilmember Sirley Cuevas Other Participants: City Manager Sean M. Moore, City Attorney Gregory M. Murphy, City Clerk Erica Harbison, Assistant City Clerk Yvette Palomo, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Lieutenant Ricky Osburn, Los Angeles County Fire Department Acting Assistant Chief Brian Kane, Municipal Services Director Michael Reyes, Finance Director Hrant Manuelian, Community Services Director Jason Minter, Community Development Director Peter Kann
B. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
Councilmember Suarez led the flag salute. Retired Pastor Dwight Dudley provided the inspiration.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney announced that agenda items G.5. Approval of the Youth Development Center Conceptual Design, G.7. Discussion of the Existing Software Used by City Departments, G.8. Lobbyist Request for Proposals, G.9. Purchasing Policy Reorganization and Amendment to Authorize City Manager Purchases in Specified Situations, J.13. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation, and J.14. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation will be continued to the next meeting.

City Attorney Murphy announced that the Closed Session items are being continued until all the City Councilmembers are present.

C. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update
Lieutenant Ricky Osburn summarized the recent law enforcement activities.

D. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) Holly Osborne, Redondo Beach Resident, commented that the Metro C Line (Green) Project has been renamed Metro K Line (Pink) Project.

Dulce Stein, Experimentally Structured Museum of Art (ESMoA) Staff, invited everyone to visit ESMoA.

Randall Abram, Resident, commented on wildfires, illegal fireworks, community partners allowed to sell fireworks and their profits.

E. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
Councilmember Talavera commented that he is looking forward to learning about the Metro C Line (Green) Project, plans to visit ESMoA and will address illegal fireworks when the Fireworks Ad Hoc Subcommittee meets.

Councilmember Suarez thanked everyone that attended tonight’s meeting, and thanked ESMoA for the programs.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney thanked everyone that spoke at tonight’s meeting, commented on the history of when the Interstate 405 Freeway was built and the Metro C Line (Green) Project.

F. CONSENT CALENDAR
A motion was made by Councilmember Suarez and seconded by Councilmember Talavera to approve the consent calendar. The motion passed by a vote of 3-2 with Mayor Pullen-Miles and Councilmember Cuevas absent.

2. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda — Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

3. Accounts Payable Register
— Recommendation: that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2501-006 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $389,831.13.

4. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting - January 6, 2025 — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes.

G. ADMINISTRATION

5. Approval of the Youth Development Center Conceptual Design- — Recommendation: that the City Council review and approve the proposed Conceptual Design for the Youth Development Center and Skatepark and affirm the Categorical Exemptions and Categorical Exclusion.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

6. Quarterly Investment Report for the Quarter Ended December 31, 2024 — Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2024.

Finance Director Manuelian presented the staff report.

By consensus, the City Council received and filed the Quarterly Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2024.

7. Discussion of the Existing Software Used by City Departments- — Recommendation: that the City Council provide City Staff with direction.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

8. Lobbyist Request for Proposals-
— Recommendation: that City Council: 1) review the Request for Proposals (RFP) received from the responding firms and provide further direction to staff to proceed with a selection process for lobbying services, which may include establishing a selection committee; or 2) provide other direction to staff as appropriate.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

Minutes - City Council
January 21, 2025
2 DRAFT

9. Purchasing Policy Reorganization and Amendment to Authorize City Manager Purchases in Specified Situations-
— Recommendation: that the City Council review the proposed changes and adopt Resolution No. CC2409-095 making the changes to the purchasing policy.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

10. Award Three Year On-Call HVAC Preventative Maintenance and Repair at City Facilities Services Contract
— Recommendation: that the City Council Award an On-Call HVAC Preventative Maintenance and Repair at City Facilities Services agreement to South Coast Mechanical, LLC, for a three-year term, with an option to extend up to three one-year extensions.

Public Works Director Lucho presented the staff report.

Councilmember Suarez asked how much has the City paid for repairs, and how often service calls are made.

Public Works Director Lucho responded that the City pays between $1,000 and $3,000 per item and commented that the preventative maintenance is $28,000. He indicated that calls for service are made often.

In response to Councilmember Talavera's and Mayor Pro Tem Kearney's questions of if the system needs replacement and why William Green Park is included in the service report, Public Works Director Lucho stated that he can provide a detailed report.

City Manager Moore responded that staff can do research and bring the item back with the new information.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item.

H. CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Moore commented that he has nothing to report.

I. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

11. Discussion of City Clerk Compensation
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1) review and discuss the City Clerk compensation; 2) provide direction to the City Manager and staff to prepare an amendment to the Lawndale Municipal Code to provide an adjustment to the City Clerk compensation; or 3) provide other direction to the City Manager and staff.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney provided background information on this item.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney opened public comments.

There was no one wishing to make a public comment.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney closed public comments.

Councilmember Suarez asked for more information on City Clerk positions in other cities.

Councilmember Talavera commented in favor of a salary increase.

A motion was made by Councilmember Talavera and seconded by Councilmember Kearney to direct the City Manager and staff to provide additional information on the City Clerk position and bring this item back Minutes - City Council
January 21, 2025
3 DRAFT
for further discussion. The motion passed by a vote of 2-1-2 with Councilmember Suarez voting no and Mayor Pullen-Miles and Councilmember Cuevas absent.

12. Report of Attendance at Meetings
Councilmember Talavera attended a Senior’s Lunch.

Councilmember Suarez attended a South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) Steering Committee meeting, Ribbon Cutting for Made Burgers, Traffic Committee meeting, and Homeless Solutions Standing Committee meeting.

Mayor Pro Tem Kearney attended a Ribbon Cutting for Made Burgers, Liability Trust and Oversight Committee meeting, Los Angeles County West Vector Control District meeting, and the Holiday Decorating Contest Annual Awards Ceremony.

J. CLOSED SESSION

13. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation - — The City Council will conduct a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), to discuss existing litigation: Name of Case: City of Lawndale v. LA Investment, LLC (LA Superior Court Case No. 20TRCV00065).

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

14. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation- — The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4), to discuss the potential initiation of litigation: one (1) case.

By consensus, the City Council continued this item to the next meeting.

K. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, Mayor Pro Tem Kearney adjourned the meeting at 7:12 p.m. ____________________________________
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
____________________________________
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
Minutes - City Council
January 21, 2025
4 DRAFT

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Peter Kann, Community Development Director SUBJECT:

Introduction of Ordinance No. 1208-25 to Amend Title 17 of the Lawndale Municipal Code to Update the City's Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations In Compliance with State Laws

BACKGROUND
The approval of Ordinance No. 1208-25 will amend Title 17 of the Lawndale Municipal Code, revising Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) regulations in compliance with State ADU laws. In recent years, the California Legislature has approved, and the Governor has signed into law, numerous bills that impose limits on local authority to regulate Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). In 2024, the California Legislature approved and the Governor signed into law two new bills — Assembly Bill (AB) 2533 and Senate Bill (SB) 1211 — that further amend State ADU law as summarized below.

STAFF REVIEW
Analysis: In 2024, the California Legislature approved, and the Governor signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 2533 and Senate Bill (SB) 1211, introducing significant amendments to the State Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) law. These legislative changes are intended to address barriers to ADU development and streamline permitting processes. To remain compliant with these new requirements, the City of Lawndale must amend its ADU ordinances.

Assembly Bill (AB) 2533 introduces provisions aimed at simplifying the permitting process and legalizing unpermitted ADUs and Junior ADUs (JADUs). AB 2533 expands the prohibition on cities denying permits for unpermitted ADUs constructed before January 1, 2018, to now include JADUs, and shifts the construction cutoff date to January 1, 2020. It also refines the health and safety denial criteria, requiring compliance with the Health and Safety Code’s substandard building standards rather than broader standards.

However, before submitting a permit to legalize an unpermitted ADU or JADU, property owners must now undergo an inspection to confirm that the violation does not pose a health or safety hazard under the updated standards. This inspection ensures that the proposed legalization aligns with state requirements and provides clarity for both property owners and local agencies. These standards include front yard setbacks, architectural requirements such as lighting, and window and door line-of-sight considerations.

Senate Bill (SB) 1211 addresses parking requirements, multifamily ADU development, and housing density.

The bill prohibits cities from requiring replacement parking for uncovered spaces demolished for or replaced with ADUs, further reducing financial burdens on property owners. Additionally, SB 1211 increases the number of detached ADUs allowed on lots with existing multifamily dwellings, permitting up to eight detached ADUs or as many as the number of primary dwelling units on the lot, whichever is less. This streamlined approach reduces regulatory barriers and encourages property owners to legalize or construct new ADUs.

The proposed ordinance incorporates changes, increasing the number of detached ADUs allowed on lots with existing multifamily dwellings to up to eight or equal to the number of primary units, whichever is less while maintaining the two-ADU limit for proposed multifamily dwellings. These changes apply to multifamily zone areas. AB 2533 allows the legalization of unpermitted ADUs if they meet Health and Safety Code section 17920.3 standards. Both bills aim to streamline permitting, remove barriers, and promote increased ADU development, supporting compliance with state law and advancing housing production goals.

Planning Commission Review: On January 8, 2025, the City's Planning Commission voted 3-0 to approve Resolution 25-01, recommending that the City Council adopt an Ordinance to comply with the State's revised ADU regulations.

Environmental Assessment: Staff recommends that the City Council find the proposed amendments to the Lawndale Municipal Code exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which applies to activities with no potential for significant environmental impact. These amendments are administrative in nature and update the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance to align with recent changes in state law, ensuring compliance with Chapter 13 to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.

Public Review: Notices of a public hearing were posted on the bulletin board outside City Hall and published in the Daily Breeze on January 14, 2024. As of the writing of this staff report, no comments from the public have been received concerning the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance amendments.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Ordinance.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing;

2. Determine that Ordinance No. 1208-25 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and

3. Introduce for first reading by title only Ordinance No. 1208-25, an Ordinance amending the Lawndale Municipal Code regarding Accessory Dwelling Units to reflect recent changes in state law, and waive further reading.

Attachments
Attachment 1 Proposed Ordinance.pdf
Attachment 2 Planning Commission Resolution.pdf
Attachment 3 Assembly Bill No. 2533.pdf
Attachment 4 Senate Bill No. 1211 .pdf

ATTACHMENT 3
As Amends the Law Today As Amends the Law on Nov 18, 2024 AB-2533 Accessory dwelling units: junior accessory dwelling units: unpermitted developments. (2023-2024)
SECTION 1. Section 66332 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66332. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, and except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b), a local agency shall not deny a permit for an unpermitted accessory dwelling unit or unpermitted junior accessory dwelling unit that was constructed before January 1, 2018, 2020, due to either of the following:
(1) The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is in violation of building standards pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 17960) of Chapter 5 of Part 1.5 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code. (2) The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit does not comply with this article or Article 3 (commencing with Section 66333), as applicable, or any local ordinance regulating accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units.
(b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a local agency may deny a permit for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit subject to subdivision (a) if the local agency makes a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure. comply with the standards specified in Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code. (c) This section shall not apply to a building that is deemed substandard pursuant to Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code.
(d) A local agency shall inform the public about the provisions of this section through public information resources, including permit checklists and the local agency’s internet website, which shall include both of the following:
(1) A checklist of the conditions specified in Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code that would deem a building substandard.
(2) Informing homeowners that, before submitting an application for a permit, the homeowner may obtain a confidential third-party code inspection from a licensed contractor to determine the unit’s existing condition or potential scope of building improvements before submitting an application for a permit. (e) A homeowner applying for a permit for a previously unpermitted accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit constructed before January 1, 2020, shall not be required to pay impact fees or connection or capacity charges except when utility infrastructure is required to comply with Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code and when the fee is authorized by subdivision (e) of Section 66324. (f) Subject to subdivision (c), upon receiving an application to permit a previously unpermitted accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit constructed before January 1, 2020, an inspector from the local agency may inspect the unit for compliance with health and safety standards and provide recommendations to comply with health and safety standards necessary to obtain a permit. If the inspector finds noncompliance with health and safety standards, the local agency shall not penalize an applicant for having the unpermitted accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit and shall approve necessary permits to correct noncompliance with health and safety standards.

Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites 12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - AB-2533 Accessory dwelling units: junior accessory dwelling units: unpermitted developments. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2533&showamends=false 1/2 SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code. 12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - AB-2533 Accessory dwelling units: junior accessory dwelling units: unpermitted developments. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2533&showamends=false 2/2 ATTACHMENT 4
As Amends the Law Today As Amends the Law on Nov 18, 2024 SB-1211 Land use: accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval. (2023-2024) SECTION 1. Section 66313 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66313. For purposes of this chapter:
(a) “Accessory dwelling unit” means an attached or a detached residential dwelling unit that provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons and is located on a lot with a proposed or existing primary residence. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel as the single-family or multifamily dwelling is or will be situated. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:
(1) An efficiency unit.
(2) A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code. (b) “Accessory structure” means a structure that is accessory and incidental to a dwelling located on the same lot.
(c) “Efficiency unit” has the same meaning as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code. (d) “Junior accessory dwelling unit” means a unit that is no more than 500 square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure. (e) “Livable space” means a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation.
(e) (f) “Living area” means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit, including basements and attics, but does not include a garage or any accessory structure.
(f) (g) “Local agency” means a city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered. (g) (h) “Nonconforming zoning condition” means a physical improvement on a property that does not conform to current zoning standards.
(h) (i) “Objective standards” means standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal. (i) (j) “Passageway” means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from a street to one entrance of the accessory dwelling unit.
(j) (k) “Permitting agency” means any entity that is involved in the review of a permit for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit and for which there is no substitute, including, but not limited to, applicable planning departments, building departments, utilities, and special districts. (k) (l) “Proposed dwelling” means a dwelling that is the subject of a permit application and that meets the requirements for permitting.

Home Bill Information California Law Publications Other Resources My Subscriptions My Favorites 12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - SB-1211 Land use: accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1211&showamends=false 1/4 (l) (m) “Public transit” means a location, including, but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes, and are available to the public.
(m) (n) “Tandem parking” means that two or more automobiles are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another.

SEC. 2. Section 66314 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66314. A local agency may, by ordinance, provide for the creation of accessory dwelling units in areas zoned to allow single-family or multifamily dwelling residential use. The ordinance shall do all of the following:
(a) Designate areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency where accessory dwelling units may be permitted.

The designation of areas may be based on the adequacy of water and sewer services and the impact of accessory dwelling units on traffic flow and public safety. A local agency that does not provide water or sewer services shall consult with the local water or sewer service provider regarding the adequacy of water and sewer services before designating an area where accessory dwelling units may be permitted. (b) (1) Impose objective standards on accessory dwelling units that include, but are not limited to, parking, height, setback, landscape, architectural review, maximum size of a unit, and standards that prevent adverse impacts on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources. These standards shall not include requirements on minimum lot size.
(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local agency may reduce or eliminate parking requirements for any accessory dwelling unit located within its jurisdiction. (c) Provide that accessory dwelling units do not exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which the accessory dwelling unit is located, and that accessory dwelling units are a residential use that is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designation for the lot. (d) Require the accessory dwelling units to comply with all of the following:
(1) Except as provided in Article 4 (commencing with Section 66340), the accessory dwelling unit may be rented separate from the primary residence, but shall not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.
(2) The lot is zoned to allow single-family or multifamily dwelling residential use and includes a proposed or existing dwelling.
(3) The accessory dwelling unit is either attached to, or located within, the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including attached garages, storage areas or similar uses, or an accessory structure or detached from the proposed or existing primary dwelling and located on the same lot as the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including detached garages.
(4) If there is an existing primary dwelling, the total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the existing primary dwelling.
(5) The total floor area for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. (6) No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. (7) No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit, and a setback of no more than four feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. (8) Local building code requirements that apply to detached dwellings, except that the construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the local building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), unless the building official or enforcement agency of the local agency makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the accessory dwelling unit could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to prevent a local agency from changing the occupancy code of a space that was unhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use pursuant to this article. 12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - SB-1211 Land use: accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1211&showamends=false 2/4 (9) Approval by the local health officer where a private sewage disposal system is being used, if required. (10) (A) Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one parking space per accessory dwelling unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway.
(B) Offstreet parking shall be permitted in setback areas in locations determined by the local agency or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. (C) This subparagraph shall not apply to an accessory dwelling unit that is described in Section 66322. (11) When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit or converted to an accessory dwelling unit, the local agency shall not require that those offstreet parking spaces be replaced. (12) Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. (e) Require that a demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit be reviewed with the application for the accessory dwelling unit and issued at the same time. (f) An accessory dwelling unit ordinance shall not require, and the applicant shall not be otherwise required, to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit, unless the property is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.

SEC. 3. Section 66323 of the Government Code is amended to read:
66323. (a) Notwithstanding Sections 66314 to 66322, inclusive, a local agency shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed-use zone to create any of the following:
(1) One accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit per lot with a proposed or existing singlefamily dwelling if all of the following apply:
(A) The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure and may include an expansion of not more than 150 square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress.
(B) The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling. (C) The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. (D) The junior accessory dwelling unit complies with the requirements of Article 3 (commencing with Section 66333).
(2) One detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four-foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a junior accessory dwelling unit described in paragraph (1). A local agency may impose the following conditions on the accessory dwelling unit:
(A) A total floor area limitation of not more than 800 square feet. (B) A height limitation as provided in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 66321, as applicable.
(3) (A) Multiple accessory dwelling units within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings. (B) A local agency shall allow at least one accessory dwelling unit within an existing multifamily dwelling and shall allow up to 25 percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units. 12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - SB-1211 Land use: accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1211&showamends=false 3/4 (4) (A) Not (i) more than two accessory dwelling units Multiple accessory dwelling units, not to exceed the number specified in clause (ii) or (iii), as applicable, that are located on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling and are subject to a height limitation in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 66321, as applicable, and rear yard and side setbacks of no more than four feet.
(ii) On a lot with an existing multifamily dwelling, not more than eight detached accessory dwelling units.

However, the number of accessory dwelling units allowable pursuant to this clause shall not exceed the number of existing units on the lot.
(iii) On a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, not more than two detached accessory dwelling units. (B) If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, the local agency shall not require any modification of the existing multifamily dwelling as a condition of approving the application to construct an accessory dwelling unit that satisfies the requirements of this paragraph. (b) A local agency shall not impose any objective development or design standard that is not authorized by this section upon any accessory dwelling unit that meets the requirements of any of paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a).
(b) (c) A local agency shall not require, as a condition for ministerial approval of a permit application for the creation of an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit, the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions.
(c) (d) The installation of fire sprinklers shall not be required in an accessory dwelling unit if sprinklers are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing multifamily dwelling. (d) (e) A local agency shall require that a rental of the accessory dwelling unit created pursuant to this section be for a term longer than 30 days.
(e) (f) A local agency may require, as part of the application for a permit to create an accessory dwelling unit connected to an onsite wastewater treatment system, a percolation test completed within the last five years, or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last 10 years. (f) (g) Notwithstanding Section 66321 and subdivision (a) a local agency that has adopted an ordinance by July 1, 2018, providing for the approval of accessory dwelling units in multifamily dwelling structures shall ministerially consider a permit application to construct an accessory dwelling unit that is described in subdivision (a), and may impose objective standards including, but not limited to, design, development, and historic standards on said accessory dwelling units. These standards shall not include requirements on minimum lot size.

SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code.
12/26/24, 5:34 PM Today's Law As Amended - SB-1211 Land use: accessory dwelling units: ministerial approval. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1211&showamends=false 4/4

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Jason Minter, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Approval of the Youth Development Center and Skatepark Conceptual Design

BACKGROUND
In December 2023 the Community Services Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP) soliciting proposals to design the Lawndale Youth Development Center and Skatepark. As a result of the RFP there were 8 proposals received, with the recommended award of the design contract going to BOA Architecture of Long Beach.

In March 2024 the City Council approved a Phase One Services Agreement in the amount of $157,000 to BOAArchitecture (Attachment A). The Phase One Agreement included the following tasks:

Pre-design, including a kickoff meeting, obtaining as-built drawings, project management, cost and work plan, site observations and assessments, and measurements and photos; Community Outreach, including a project site meeting, community collective/vision meeting, final draft master plan meeting, and refine meeting, and a final master plan meeting; Completion of property and environmental reports, including land and soils surveys, topographical land survey reports, geotechnical and percolation testing, and hazardous materials testing; and Deliverables, including CAD renderings, continuously evolving technical conceptual designs, necessary number of city-required revisions, final conceptual designs, and cost estimates for presentation of a final conceptual design.

In July 2024 Community Services Department staff, along with representatives from BOA Architecture, presented 4 design options to City Council, each with a list of amenities and estimated project costs. After public comment and questions, the Council direction was to pursue option D (Attachment B), including the following:

Keep the 2 story version of the project with Municipal Services Offices and Cable on the second floor, and the first floor a dedicated Youth Development Center; Include the skatepark on the west side of the parcel;
Eliminate the parking lot portion (northwest corner of Burin Ave. and De Oro Lane) to a later phase of the project when additional funding can be obtained;
Reduce the footprint/scope of the project from the estimated $14,428,800 to get closer to the current budget of $9,500,000; and
Complete the community outreach meetings to get public input on the overall design.

In December 2024 staff met with representatives from BOA Architecture to review the updated final conceptual design. Staff reviewed the proposed design with members of the Municipal Services Department and City Cable to ensure their needs were being met by the design. BOA made the final adjustments, incorporating the landscape design and skatepark features, which are now ready to be presented to the City Council.

STAFF REVIEW
The Lawndale Youth Development Center and Skatepark will be a landmark facility in the City, which will have a positive impact on the youth in the community for decades to come. This unique project combines city office space, a cable TV studio, a teen center and resource facility, and a skatepark all on one property.

The effort put into the design of this facility has been shared by multiple departments, a team of architects, and community input, all with the goal of making the Youth Development Center and Skatepark a critical focal point for youth and teen programs, public engagement, community enrichment, and the overall enhancement of the Lawndale community.

The conceptual design being presented at this time has incorporated community feedback, along with input from the City staff included in the facility, to ensure that there is adequate public access, while maintaining a multi-purpose feel to allow a variety of programming, training, and counseling opportunities. The teen center itself includes the following components:

A dedicated teen center entrance off of De Oro Lane for teen center participants only; A large room for teens to gather, watch movies, play games, do homework, study, and hangout with their peers;
A pantry for snacks and drinks that will be available at a nominal cost; Office space for staff to create programs, meet with students, parents or service providers, all with sight lines of the rest of the teen center;
A patio for special events, job fairs, college fairs, etc., complete with a stage for entertainment if needed;
A development and resource room with separate counseling offices that will be multipurpose in nature with movable furniture, audio visual connections, a service counter, and more; A small multi-purpose room for club meetings, study groups, homework sessions, etc.; and Restrooms dedicated to the teen center.

The first floor of the facility will also include a separate public entrance for direct access to the Municipal Services Department (MSD) and the Cable TV studio that will be housed on the second floor. This entrance will be located off of Burin Avenue, at the southeast corner of the building. The entrance will give the public both elevator and stair access to the second floor where there will be a small waiting area with a counter to give the public easy access to the department. There is also a breakroom, restrooms, and storage for both the MSD and cable staff.

The skatepark itself is roughly 9,500 square feet, with a series of elements that combine beginner and intermediate skill levels. The skatepark perimeter will be fenced, allowing staff to secure it at night or during periods of inclement weather where it would be unsafe to have the skatepark open. There will be landscaping around the skatepark, with a buffer to separate the skatepark from the teen center patio.

Overall the Youth Development Center has been designed to complement the architectural style of the nearby Public Library and the Harold Hofmann Community Center. The design features sloped roofs for easier maintenance and better drainage, modern styling and furniture, and large windows for natural light.

The Youth Development Center will provide many programs and opportunities to the community, while housing critical staff functions for the overall quality of life in the City of Lawndale.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Lawndale Youth Development Center project has been previously cleared by the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), the grant administrator for the State funding, with a “Notice of Exemption” filed by the City in October 2022. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15061(b)(3) and 15302 (Reconstruction). Pursuant to 24 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 58.35(a), the project is categorically excluded activity under Section 58.5(3) (iii)(A) Rehabilitation of buildings and improvements of public buildings under the following conditions:

The facilities and improvements are in place and will not change in size or capacity by more than 20 percent.

LEGAL REVIEW
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
The current budget allocation for this project is $9,745,000. With the current construction costs estimated at $11,477,180, additional funding will be required. In addition to construction costs, there will be costs for the creation of construction documents and the approval of an agreement for project management services.

Finally, the actual construction costs will require a competitive bid, which could change the overall project cost as well.

The current funding is made up of the following:
$4,000,000 State Restricted Funding for the Youth Development Center Project $4,000,000 Federal Restricted Funding for the Youth Development Center Project $1,280,000 in Los Angeles County Recreation, Parks and Open Space Measure A Annual Allocation from FY 24/25 and previous
$285,000 in Los Angeles County Technical Assistance Program Allocation $180,000 Los Angeles County Recreation, Parks and Open Space Measure A Annual Allocation for FY 25/26 due to be allocated in September 2025
Total Funding: $9,745,000
With an estimated project cost of $11,477,180, and a budget of $9,745,000, there is a gap of $1,732,180. Without additional funding this excess in the project cost would come out of the City's General Fund Reserves. Staff is looking for guidance from council on funding.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council review and approve the proposed Conceptual Design for the Youth Development Center and Skatepark (Attachment C) and affirm the Categorical Exemptions and Categorical Exclusion.

Attachments
Attachment A: Excerpt of Minutes.3.18.2024
Attachment B: Excerpt of Minutes.7.15.2024
Attachment C: Lawndale YDC SD Presentation 2-3-25

ATTACHMENT A
Excerpt of Minutes from the 3/18/2024
City Council Meeting

ATTACHMENT B
Excerpt of Minutes from the 7/15/2024
City Council Meeting

CITY OF LAWNDALE

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER

SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK
February 3, 2025 | p2

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK
Project Kick-Off April 3, 2024
Conducted Site Surveys
Preliminary Design Option May 16, 2024
Proceeded with Design Option for 2 Level Building
Community Outreach Meetings September, 2024
Schematic Design to Meet Desired Budget November, 2024
Reduced Size of Building
Present Schematic Design to City Council February, 2025

PROJECT TIMELINE

EXISTING

PROPOSED
February 3, 2025 | p3

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK - EXISTING BUILDING

EXTERIOR

INTERIOR
February 3, 2025 | p4

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK
Schematic Design Building Program (2 Story)
First Level
Teen Center 3,609 SF
Support, Circulation 1,170 SF
First Level Subtotal 4,779 SF
Second Level
Municipal Services 1,682 SF
Cable TV Dept 1,410 SF
Support, Circulation 1,703 SF
Second Level Subtotal 4,795 SF
Total Building 9,574 SF
Schematic Design Site Program
Teen Center Courtyard 2,250 SF
Skate Park 9,500 SF
Site Subtotal 11,750 SF
Existing Municipal Services Program
Municipal Services 2,697 SF
Cable TV 1,024 SF
Historical Society 720 SF
Support and Circulation 3,231 SF
Total Existing Building 7,672 SF

SITE AND BUILDING PROGRAM
February 3, 2025 | p5

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE
First Level
Building Renovation 3,855 SF $850 $3,276,750
Building Addition 894 SF $950 $849,300
Second Level
Building Renovation 0 SF $850 $0
Building Addition 4,825 SF $950 $4,583,750
Circulation (Elevator,stairs) $200,000
Building Subtotal 9,574 SF $8,909,800
Exterior Improvements
Skate park/Landscape SF $924,000
Shade Structure $0
Teen Center Courtyard 2,500 SF $200,000
2 Stall Park Restroom $400,000
Landscape Subtotal 2,500 SF $1,524,000
Subtotal $10,433,800
Contingency 10% $1,043,380
Total $11,477,180
February 3, 2025 | p6

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Aerial View

DE ORO LANE

LIBRARY
YOUTH

DEVELOPMENT

CENTER AND

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES

COURTYARD

COMMUNITY
CENTER

SKATE PARK
February 3, 2025 | p7

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
LANDSCAPING - Concept Imagery

CONCEPT IMAGERY
CITY OF LAWNDALE - LAWNDALE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SKATE PARK Januar y 15th, 2025 February 3, 2025 | p8

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

SITE PLAN
Januar y 15th, 2025

CONCEPT PLAN

CITY OF LAWNDALE - LAWNDALE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SKATE PARK NORTH
LEGEND
4’ FENCE
8’ FENCE

EXISTING TREE

ENHANCED PAVERS

DRAPE METAL BACK BENCH
1 0 5 10 20 40 FEET

POUF SEATING

CORNHOLE TABLES

LOW PRECAST WALL

ROCK COBBLE

STOOP SEATING
4 6 11
7 12
8 13
9 14
10 15

CHAISE SEATING

METAL SLAT SEATING

PING PONG

BIKE RACK

WASTE RECEPTACLES
2 3
1 4
5 6
10 15
14 12
11 13
7 8
9 2 3

DE ORO LN

BURIN AVE

GREVILLEA AVE

LAWNDALE LIBRARY
5 SKATEPARK
YOUTH

DEVELOPMENT
CENTER
February 3, 2025 | p9

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER COURTYARD

COURTYARD
CITY OF LAWNDALE - LAWNDALE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SKATE PARK Januar y 15th, 2025 February 3, 2025 | p10

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

SKATE PARK

SKATE PARK
CITY OF LAWNDALE - LAWNDALE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SKATE PARK Januar y 15th, 2025 February 3, 2025 | p11

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT, SKATE PARK

BUILDING DESIGN GOALS
Exterior design shall be consistent with other structures in the Civic Center vicinity
Provide a sloped roof to reduce the maintenance needs and provide future solar opportunities
Provide site connection between skate park and Youth Center Provide separate entrances for Youth Center and Municipal Services
Maintain existing corner tree
Provide natural light for upper offices
February 3, 2025 | p12

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Floor Plan Level 1

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES ENTRY

TEEN CENTER
ENTRY
1128 SF
TEEN
CENTER
LOBBY
GAME
ZONE
MOVIE
LOUNGE
CAFE
560 SF

DEVELOPMENT
AND

RESOURCE
CENTER
254 SF
SMALL

MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
96 SF
OFFICE
113 SF
OFFICE
96 SF
PANTRY
69 SF

STORAGE
167 SF

ELECTRICAL
PANELS
51 SF

ELEVATOR

EQUIPMENT
197 SF
WOMENS

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR LOBBY SINK

KITCHENETTE W/ SINK
145 SF
MENS

RESTROOM
SINK
66 SF

JANITOR
62 SF

NETWORK
CLOSET
95 SF

COUNSELING
OFFICE

STORAGE

CABINETS

COUNTER
103 SF

COUNSELING
ROOM
N

DE ORO LANE

COURTYARD
BURIN AVE.

February 3, 2025 | p13

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Floor Plan, Level 2

ROOF LEDGE
130 SF

CABLE TV

DIRECTOR
60 SF

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR
127 SF
ANIMAL

CONTROL
135 SF

DIRECTOR
110 SF

EMERGENCY
SERVICES ?
?
275 SF

MEETING
ROOM

FRONT DESK
798 SF

CABLE TV
STUDIO
45 SF

NETWORK
69 SF
STORAGE 60 SF

RESTROOM
75 SF
GEAR

STORAGE
231 SF

CABLE TV
OFFICE
23 SF

JANITOR
309 SF
BREAK
ROOM

KITCHENETTE
152 SF

PARKING

ENFORCEMENT
152 SF
CODE
ENFORCEMENT 128 SF

SUPERVISOR

PRINTERS
328 SF
UPPER
LOBBY
823 SF

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES
OPEN
OFFICE

COUNTER
44 SF
CABLE
SERVER
67 SF
STUDIO

STORAGE
N
February 3, 2025 | p14

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - VIEW FROM DE ORO
February 3, 2025 | p15

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - VIEW FROM COURTYARD February 3, 2025 | p16

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - VIEW FROM COURTYARD

COURTYARD RECREATION
February 3, 2025 | p17

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Interior Views, Teen Center

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES ENTRY

TEEN CENTER
ENTRY
1128 SF
TEEN
CENTER
LOBBY
GAME
ZONE
MOVIE
LOUNGE
CAFE
560 SF

DEVELOPMENT
AND

RESOURCE
CENTER
254 SF
SMALL

MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
96 SF
OFFICE
113 SF
OFFICE
96 SF
PANTRY
69 SF

STORAGE
167 SF

ELECTRICAL
PANELS
51 SF

ELEVATOR

EQUIPMENT
197 SF
WOMENS

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR LOBBY SINK

KITCHENETTE W/ SINK
145 SF
MENS

RESTROOM
SINK
66 SF

JANITOR
62 SF

NETWORK
CLOSET
95 SF

COUNSELING
OFFICE

STORAGE

CABINETS

COUNTER
103 SF

COUNSELING
ROOM

OUTSIDE ENTRY LOBBY
February 3, 2025 | p18

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Interior Views, Teen Center

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES ENTRY

TEEN CENTER
ENTRY
1128 SF
TEEN
CENTER
LOBBY
GAME
ZONE
MOVIE
LOUNGE
CAFE
560 SF

DEVELOPMENT
AND

RESOURCE
CENTER
254 SF
SMALL

MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
96 SF
OFFICE
113 SF
OFFICE
96 SF
PANTRY
69 SF

STORAGE
167 SF

ELECTRICAL
PANELS
51 SF

ELEVATOR

EQUIPMENT
197 SF
WOMENS

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR LOBBY SINK

KITCHENETTE W/ SINK
145 SF
MENS

RESTROOM
SINK
66 SF

JANITOR
62 SF

NETWORK
CLOSET
95 SF

COUNSELING
OFFICE

STORAGE

CABINETS

COUNTER
103 SF

COUNSELING
ROOM
Goals:

Create an inviting, “living room” atmosphere
Areas for games and activities, movies, homework and creating community February 3, 2025 | p19

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Interior Views, Teen Center

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES ENTRY

TEEN CENTER
ENTRY
1128 SF
TEEN
CENTER
LOBBY
GAME
ZONE
MOVIE
LOUNGE
CAFE
560 SF

DEVELOPMENT
AND

RESOURCE
CENTER
254 SF
SMALL

MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
96 SF
OFFICE
113 SF
OFFICE
96 SF
PANTRY
69 SF

STORAGE
167 SF

ELECTRICAL
PANELS
51 SF

ELEVATOR

EQUIPMENT
197 SF
WOMENS

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR LOBBY SINK

KITCHENETTE W/ SINK
145 SF
MENS

RESTROOM
SINK
66 SF

JANITOR
62 SF

NETWORK
CLOSET
95 SF

COUNSELING
OFFICE

STORAGE

CABINETS

COUNTER
103 SF

COUNSELING
ROOM

CAFE AND MOVIE AREA GAME ZONE
February 3, 2025 | p20

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES ENTRY

TEEN CENTER
ENTRY
1128 SF
TEEN
CENTER
LOBBY
GAME
ZONE
MOVIE
LOUNGE
CAFE
560 SF

DEVELOPMENT
AND

RESOURCE
CENTER
254 SF
SMALL

MULTIPURPOSE
ROOM
96 SF
OFFICE
113 SF
OFFICE
96 SF
PANTRY
69 SF

STORAGE
167 SF

ELECTRICAL
PANELS
51 SF

ELEVATOR

EQUIPMENT
197 SF
WOMENS

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR LOBBY SINK

KITCHENETTE W/ SINK
145 SF
MENS

RESTROOM
SINK
66 SF

JANITOR
62 SF

NETWORK
CLOSET
95 SF

COUNSELING
OFFICE

STORAGE

CABINETS

COUNTER
103 SF

COUNSELING
ROOM

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Interior Views, Teen Center

DEVELOPMENT AND RESOURCE CENTER
Goal:

A room for seminars, job fairs, self and career development Provide rooms for private counseling
February 3, 2025 | p21

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC

YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - ENTRANCE TO MUNICIPAL SERVICES February 3, 2025 | p22

CITY OF LAWNDALE - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER SCHEMATIC
YDC, MUNICIPAL SERVICES, CABLE DEPT - Interior Views, Municipal Services

ROOF LEDGE
130 SF

CABLE TV

DIRECTOR
60 SF

RESTROOM

ELEVATOR
127 SF
ANIMAL

CONTROL
135 SF

DIRECTOR
110 SF

EMERGENCY
SERVICES ?
?
275 SF

MEETING
ROOM

FRONT DESK
798 SF

CABLE TV
STUDIO
45 SF

NETWORK
69 SF
STORAGE 60 SF

RESTROOM
75 SF
GEAR

STORAGE
231 SF

CABLE TV
OFFICE
23 SF

JANITOR
309 SF
BREAK
ROOM

KITCHENETTE
152 SF

PARKING

ENFORCEMENT
152 SF
CODE
ENFORCEMENT 128 SF

SUPERVISOR

PRINTERS
328 SF
UPPER
LOBBY
823 SF

MUNICIPAL

SERVICES
OPEN
OFFICE

COUNTER
44 SF
CABLE
SERVER
67 SF
STUDIO

STORAGE

MUNICIPAL SERVICES PUBLIC COUNTER

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michael Reyes, Municipal Services Director SUBJECT: Emergency Alert Registration Process

BACKGROUND
The City of Lawndale, in an effort to protect its residents and business owners in the event of a natural or man-made disaster recently purchased the Everbridge Alert System. The Everbridge Alert System allows City staff to deliver vital public safety information to residents across multiple electronic platforms such as cell phones, landlines, email, and faxes in multiple languages in the event of an emergency.

STAFF REVIEW
The Everbridge Alert System is the public alert system adopted by LA County to promote public awareness during emergencies. Many cities in LA County, including our neighboring South Bay cities like Inglewood, Torrance, Carson, and Hawthorne, have joined the Everbridge Alert System to improve public safety and awareness in their jurisdictions.

The Everbridge Alert System allows Emergency Management staff to deliver urgent notifications and important updates directly to our residents. Whether it’s severe weather alerts, public safety announcements, or other critical information, the Everbridge system allows staff to ensure that recipients receive timely and accurate messages that can help residents make informed decisions during emergencies.

The Everbridge system has three major benefits: real-time alerts, customizable notifications, and accessibility.
• Real-Time Alerts: Residents and businesses receive immediate notifications regarding emergencies and safety information.
• Customizable Notifications: The City of Lawndale sends out personalized messages through multiple communication channels, including text, email, and phone calls. Staff can also modify messages to be in the preferred language of the recipient.
• Accessibility: Any resident or business owner can register by themselves through a QR code and website link. Residents may also contact the Municipal Service Department directly at (310) 973-3220 and staff can enter their information into the Everbridge database.

When the City of Lawndale recognizes emerging threats to our residents, the Director of the Municipal Services Department and the Emergency Preparedness Coordinator create a message. After City Manager approval, the message is sent out to residents, businesses, and employees of the City of Lawndale through the Everbridge portal website.

The Everbridge system allows staff to select recipients based on their addresses residents, etc.) to meet the particular needs of different recipient groups. Depending on the situation and needs, we can use the Everbridge Alert System to create two-way communications between the city emergency operations team and recipients.

Since this alert system is opt-in, it is critical to inform all of the City’s residents of the Everbridge system.

Staff have placed flyers and sign-up sheets in our community center, city hall, and Lawndale Library. We have also spoken with managers of fifteen retail stores, including Sprouts, Target, Starbucks, Walmart, Dollar Tree, CVS, Smart & Final, and others, to display our flyers for residents to register for our alert system. Additionally, staff have sent emails to school districts, churches, the Sheriff's Department, and EMI to seek cooperation. Staff will continue to make efforts to encourage and reach our residents so that we can maximize our outreach.

In addition to its use during emergency operations, the public alert system is a critical part of the city’s preparation process. We will include our new alert system in our emergency operations plan and use it for training purposes for city employees and residents.

LEGAL REVIEW
No legal review is necessary.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this staff report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this report.

BACKGROUND
At the request of City Council, staff reviewed the light-emitting diode (LED) blinking stop signs available in the market today, and compiled the information contained in this staff report for Council discussion.

STAFF REVIEW
Stop Signs History:

The first stop signs documented were installed in Michigan in 1915, according to the Manual of Traffic Signs. Originally, they were square-shaped, measuring 2 feet by 2 feet and featured black letters on a yellow background, according to Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Retro-reflective material on the surface was mandated in the 1948 MUTCD, and it wasn't until 1954 that the MUTCD mandated all stop signs be red and octagonal.

LED Stop signs were first used in California in the 2000’s, the MUTCD makes no reference to where or when to use of them, however it regulates the design standards of the LED signs.

Use of LED Stop Signs
Individual cities and counties decide where to install LED stop signs based on traffic analysis and accident data. In California, the implementation of LED stop signs is primarily done through local municipalities utilizing solar-powered flashing LED systems at intersections deemed high-risk for "roll-throughs" or "blowthroughs", adhering to the California MUTCD guidelines which allow for LED enhancements on regulatory signs like stop signs, but with specific limitations on their application based on factors like visibility and driver distraction concerns where LED units may be used to enhance the sign.

Typical concerns for agencies that have installed LED stop signs at key locations are excessive flashing as reported by neighbors in the vicinity of the signs, or overly bright LED lights causing driver distraction. The installation of the LED stop signs does not guarantee that drivers will stop at these locations, blinking LED stop signs just add visibility to the sign.

LED Stop Signs
The majority of LED stop signs utilize solar power for self-sustainability, using batteries to power the LED at night. The batteries may last three to five years before they need to be replaced.

Ideal Locations
When the width of the arterial road is a significant factor at an intersection and the stop sign is out of the normal line of vision of a driver. Furthermore, when there is a vertical curve, rise, slope, or hill approaching an intersection impeding driver’s sight of the sign as they approach it. Also, blinking LED stop signs are used on roads where there are visual natural distractions to the driver.

Additionally a traffic analysis for an intersection may recommend the use of these LED signs.

Before installing a blinking LED stop sign, the standard practice is to study the suggested intersection, including performing vehicular and pedestrian traffic counts as well as reviewing the intersection geometrics and the traffic collision history. There are other options to explore prior to the installation of LED stop signs, such as installing Stop Ahead pavement markings and associated signage, or increasing the size of the stop signs.

The City of Lawndale has 444 documented stop signs according to the latest 2023 count, where the damaged stop signs are currently being replaced with new fully reflective signs as part of the 2023-2024 Citywide Sign Replacement capital improvement project, which is nearing completion.

Cost of Solar Powered LED Blinking Stop Signs
The cost of a quality solar powered blinking stop sign is $3,000 - $4,000 installed per sign ($1,332,000 to $1,776,000). Intersections require two to four signs at the time. Additional costs include the preparation of the traffic study required to justify the installation of the LED stop signs.

Reflective Tape or Panels for Signposts
Staff also reviewed reflective tape and reflective panels as a means of adding visibility of a stop sign at night, both work well and are more cost effective than LED stop signs.

The cost to install reflective tape on existing stop sign poles is estimated to be up to $200 per pole, while the cost for installation of reflective panels on post is up to $350 per pole. Tape is highly reflective, with an effective life span of 3 to 10 years. Reflective panels last around 7 years.

Typically, the use of reflective tape or reflective panels on city streets is limited to signs on streets with no or minimal public illumination.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report.

FUNDING
No funding has been allocated.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council reviews the information contained in this report, discuss, and provide direction to staff for future implementation of these devices.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Peter Kann, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Regional Early Action Plan 2 Grant - Program Objectives Discussion

BACKGROUND
The Regional Early Action Plan (REAP) Grant is a grant program that is administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The principal goal of the REAP Grants is to make funding available to Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPOs) and other regional agencies for Transformative Planning and Implementation Activities that meet Housing and equity goals, reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Per Capita, and advance implementation of the region's Sustainable Communities Strategy. The MPOs that encompass the City of Lawndale is the Southern California Association of Government (SCAG), which was allocated approximately $231.5 million in funding and they distributed a portion of it to the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG).

The REAP 2.0 is a flexible program that has three objectives:

1. Accelerate Infill Housing,

2. Supports efforts for Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH), and

3. Reduce VMT.

This REAP 2.0 Phase 2 is specifically exploring redevelopment of commercial sites into high density housing developments. SBCCOG is inquiring cities within their region to possibly volunteer two commercial sites for SBCCOG's consultants to screen commercial parcels for detailed analysis for a feasibility study. The Phase 2 study is particularly focused on the redevelopment of gas stations and under utilized retail commercial sites for conversion into high density housing developments.

As of the writing of this staff report, it is staff's understanding that the following cities have agreed to participate in the program:

City of Carson,
City of El Segundo,
City of Hawthorne,
City of Hermosa Beach,
City of Manhattan Beach,
City of Redondo Beach, and
City of Torrance.

STAFF REVIEW
Staff has reviewed the REAP 2.0 program procedural requirements, eligibility and guidance for infill, analysis of the existing gas stations and under utilized retail commercial sites within the City.

A summary of staff concern's regarding REAP 2.0's objectives which may conflict with the City's goals and objectives:

1. Accelerate Infill Housing - The City's has seven gas stations (76, Speedway Express, three Arco, and two Chevron) which are all currently in operations. Staff has not discussed with property owners and/or business owners for their input regarding the infill development. In addition, the regulations and procedural requirements to convert a site previously used for a gas station into any residential use requires site remediation and coordination with the State Department of Toxic and Substance Control, which can take years to fully comply with. These gas stations' existing lot size and adjacent land uses would not produce a significant volume of housing units. The City's commercial zones are comprised of smaller lots of varying sizes that generally support local retail/commercial uses.

2. Af irmatively Further Fair Housing - The City's recently certified Housing Element identify the City's Compliance with fair housing laws and regulations. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has not evaluated the policies of REAP 2.0's AFFH support effort. Due to the unknown of the study's AFFH support effort, staff would require additional time to research REAP's AFFH goals and objectives.

3. Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled - VMT is a method of evaluating transportation impacts with metrics that supports the reduction of greenhouse gas emission. In 2023, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified for the City of Lawndale General Plan 2045 Update. The certified EIR analyzed the City's greenhouse gas emission, transportation policy, and all required mitigation. Given staff's concerns about the accelerated infill housing section of the program, staff would need more time to research, evaluate, and discussions with the SBCCOG to get a better understanding on the goals and objectives concerning VMT as it pertains to the program.

In addition to requiring additional information about the REAP 2.0 program, staff has the long-term concerns:

1. Pursuant to the City's General Plan Land Use Element, the City has a total of 1,195 acres of land and only 38 acres designated for commercial land uses, which is 3.17 percent. The policy to potentially convert the City's very limited commercial land uses/businesses to high density housing will may have long term impacts to the City's sales and gas tax revenue generated in the City.

2. The City is subject to the AFFH goals and policies set forth in the City's Housing Element. The City's AFFH goal and policy is to expand the range of housing opportunities for seniors with fixed incomes, low and moderate income residents, the disabled, large families, female-headed households with children, and person at-risk of homelessness, and homeless. Staff has reviewed SBCCOG's report Redevelopment of Commercial to Sustainable Housing dated September 2023, they identify key findings and takeaways for South Bay Cities. To summarize one key finding, "infill development is often financially challenging due to increased building heights, parking costs due to sub-grade parking structure. In addition, these new units' cost cannot be supported despite elevated rents" Despite the City's effort, these market rate housing development would not meet the City's AFFH goals and policies.

LEGAL REVIEW
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are potential fiscal impacts with the REAP 2.0 program if commercial and gas station sites are selected for conversion into high density affordable housing through the REAP 2.0 program. The City could potentially lose out on sales and gas tax revenues due to the conversion of commercial sites into housing.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council;

1. Discuss the REAP 2.0 Grant Program;

2. Direct staff to communicate to the Executive Director of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments that the City at this time is not interested in participating in the REAP 2.0 Grant Program; or

3. Direct staff to communicate to the Executive Director of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments that the City is interested in participating in the REAP 2.0 Grant Program; or

4. Provide further direction to staff.

Grace Huizar, Senior Management Analyst
Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
SUBJECT:

Approve the Disposal of Two Vehicles, One Air Compressor, and One Traffic Message Board

BACKGROUND
On an annual basis, staff performs a needs assessment of vehicles and equipment based on age, mileage, and resources lost due to down time for repairs. For this year, the Public Works Department has two vehicles, one air compressor, and one traffic message board that need to be disposed of due to age and inoperability, or have reached the end of use. Furthermore, both vehicles are equipped with Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fuel tanks that are due to expire this year in December. Replacement vehicles were purchased in October 2024 with City Council approval on October 21, 2024.

The Lawndale Municipal Code, Section 3.08 (“Purchasing”) establishes the duties of the Purchasing Officer and his/her designee. The purchasing code further states in Section 3.08.040, Item J that the Purchasing Officer shall: “recommend the sale of all supplies and equipment which cannot be used by any agency, or which have become unsuitable for city use.”
In addition, Section 3.08.110 B states: “sale of surplus personal property shall occur after soliciting three bids or by auction” and “items to be sold at auction must first be approved by the City Council.”

STAFF REVIEW
The vehicles listed below have incurred significant resources due to mechanical failures and leaking CNG fuel tank repairs and are recommended for auction. These vehicles have already been replaced with prior Council approval on October 21, 2024.

Vehicle #1
Year Make and Model: 2012 Ford F-250 Truck
License Plate Number: 1397519
Vehicle Identification Number: 1FT7X2A63CEC56679
City Vehicle Number: 500
Vehicle #2
Year Make and Model: 2012 Ford F-250 Truck
License Plate Number: 1397518
Vehicle Identification Number: 1FTBF2A65CEC56678
City Vehicle Number: 501
The equipment listed below have reached the end of useful life and are inoperable. The manufacturer will no longer repair or update this equipment; therefore, it is being recommended for auction.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed the staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this item. For the disposal via public auction of the vehicles and equipment, the City has utilized the services of Ken Porter Auctions (KPA) who honors the State bid arrangement for auctioned items at no cost to the City. Once the items have been sold the City will receive the proceeds and will be deposited to the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

Air Compressor, Asset Tag #000019
Traffic Message Board, Serial No. 4GM1M091051 452806
Approve the sale of two vehicles, one air compressor, and one traffic message board through the City’s standard public auction process facilitated by Ken Porter Auctions in Carson, California.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Peter Kann, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Discussion of the Existing Software Used by City Departments

BACKGROUND
The City uses various software solutions to aid in the daily functions of numerous departments. At one time, Community Development, Municipal Services, and Public Works were all under one software solution, which was CityView. However, since 2021, the Code Enforcement and Animal Control divisions of Municipal Services have migrated over to Citizenserve.

Below is a summary of the software being currently used by the various departments within the City:

Community Development has been using CityView since 2007. Functions include monitoring planning applications and entitlements, record keeping, and issuing building and planning permits.

Public Works has been using CityView since 2007. Functions include issuance of encroachment permits and tracking inspections.

Municipal Services has been using Citizenserve since 2021. Functions include tracking and monitoring code enforcement and animal control cases as well as record keeping for animal vaccination and registration.

Finance has been using Citizenserve since 2019. Functions include day-to-day administration of Finance reports and business license applications.

The annual costs for the software are:

CityView - $25,500 (with an annual increase of up to 5%) Citizenserve - $28,800 (the number of users is factored in the annual costs) Analysis: Some departments prefer keeping their existing software while other departments would prefer finding a new software solution to obtain new and expanded services. For example, Community Development prefers to keep CityView because it can issue building permits, track site plans, and entitlement applications as well as maintain historical permit and entitlement data since first using CityView.

However, CityView is not the preferred software for the Municipal Services Department, who left CityView and migrated to Citizenserve. Municipal Services is considering seeking other software alternatives.

Common issues are data search inquiries not finding the appropriate records as well as current up-to-date information about animal control matters. The data migration and process implementation took a lot of staff time due to fixing glitches or correcting data errors made during the migration. Staff have also mentioned that residents have encountered issues with accessing their online accounts through Citizenserve or have encountered issues when generating dog license renewal notices.

The use of various software also impacts communication and efficiency between departments as information and data is not easily accessible between departments. The different software's do not communicate or interact with one another, causing delays in getting updates and information on property data, permit and enforcement case information, and entitlement status, which can cause miscommunication of information between departments and delays moving forward with enforcement cases or development projects.

In addition, the current software solutions do not allow customers to pay for permits and entitlements online or view permits and application status through an accessible online portal. Implementing such a feature would add a more convenient option for customers to apply or follow up on an application and improve transparency on application or project status and more easily access publicly available information on properties.

An example of a common feature requested by staff includes a GIS-based interface that would allow numerous actions to be performed when selecting a parcel. Desired actions include tasks such as viewing zoning and property information, viewing permit records, viewing and managing code enforcement and animal control cases, reviewing and issuing permits and entitlements, keeping track of any public right-ofway improvements and permits. The benefit of implementing such feature would allow staff to view all information on properties in real time under one software, improving communication and efficiency between departments.

In summary, the purpose of this report is to keep the City Council informed about the existing software used and future software needs for the day-to-day operations of the various City Departments.

STAFF REVIEW
Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the City's direction regarding implementation of the existing and/or future software:

Should staff continue using CityView, and migrate all departments back to CityView, with expanded features and services?
Should staff maintain the status quo of different software for each City Department? Should staff seek a Request for Proposal (RFP) to software companies to integrate the functions of the various departments into one software?
City staff have communicated with the different vendors for possible solutions to improve services as requested by the City Council and the public.

LEGAL REVIEW
None

FISCAL IMPACT
Discussion for the City Council's direction will not have a Fiscal Impact.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council provide City Staff with direction.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: February 3, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Raylette Felton, Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: Consideration of Professional Legislative Lobbyist Services RFP

BACKGROUND
At the July 15, 2024, City Council meeting, City Councilmember, Rhonda Hofmann Gorman, presented an item for City Council’s discussion regarding the possibility of hiring a federal lobbyist. Based on City Council’s discussion during this meeting, this item was continued to the September 16, 2024, meeting whereby staff presented a draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for cost services for further review and discussion. During this meeting, City Council approved the draft RFP and provided staff with direction to proceed.

On September 30, 2024, staff advertised the attached RFP to obtain competitive bids from experienced firms to provided professional legislative lobbying services. Four (4) firms responded to the RFP: Joe A.

Gonsalves & Son, Kiley Associates, LLC, Carpi & Clay and Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Attached for City Council’s review are the proposals from the above-mentioned firms for consideration.

Staff reached out to the responding firms to obtain permission to include their proposals with this staff report, which was received.

STAFF REVIEW
On September 30, 2024, City staff sent out an RFP for Professional Legislative and Lobbying Services for Local Government to ten firms, registered with the State of California, Secretary of State’s Office to lobby the legislature and administrative branches of state government. The City Clerk’s Department received four sealed proposals on or before the October 31, 2024, submission deadline. Per City Council’s direction, responding firms included a fee schedule to provide federal lobbyist services, which are as follows:

Firm Fee Schedule
Joe A. Gonsalves & Son Monthly Retainer - $3,500
Kiley Associates, LLC Monthly Retainer - $4,000
Carpi & Clay Monthly Retainer - $5,000
Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. Monthly Retainer - $8,000 Staff completed a preliminary review of the submitted proposals and determined that the proposals meet the minimum qualifications as identified in the RFP. In efforts to move forward and further review, evaluate and select a potential firm, staff is seeking further direction from City Council as to next steps. As such, staff is recommending that City Council further discuss the possibility of hiring a legislative federal lobbyist and provide staff with direction regarding potential next steps.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s Office has reviewed and approved the staff report and its attachments.

FISCAL IMPACT
N/A

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council: 1) review the Request for Proposals (RFP) received from the responding firms and provide further direction to staff to proceed with a selection process for lobbying services, which may include establishing a selection committee; or 2) provide other direction to staff as appropriate.

Attachments
Attachment A -RFP for Legislative Lobby Services -2024.pdf Attachment B -RFP Response - Joe A. Gonsalves & Son.pdf Attachment C -RFP Response - Kiley Associates, LLC.pdf
Attachment D -RFP Response - Capri & Clay.pdf
Attachment E -RFP Response - Townsend Public Affairs.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

CITY OF LAWNDALE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
RFP NO. 2410-34

PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBYING

SERVICES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
SEPTEMBER 30, 2024
OCTOBER 31, 2024, AT 5:00PM
City Clerks’ Office
Attention: Legislative and Lobbying Services
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260
RELEASE DATE:

PROPOSALS DUE:

SUBMIT TO:
2 | Page

CITY OF LAWNDALE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS – PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBING

SERVICES

SECTION I - GENERAL INFORMATION
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:

The City Council of the City of Lawndale invites experienced firms or individuals to submit Cost Proposals for Professional Legislative and Lobbing Services as described in the Scope of Services set forth in Section II of this request. The selected firms or individuals will work collaboratively with the City Council, City Manager, and designated staff to develop legislative priorities, serve as an advocate for the City at local state and federal levels, gain support from policy makers on local initiatives, monitor grants, and obtain funding opportunities and services based on the needs and priorities of the Lawndale community.

The City is seeking experienced firms or individuals who have demonstrated experience providing legislative representation and lobbying services with State legislators and public officials. The selected firm or individuals will serve at the pleasure of the City Council and under the management of the City Manager’s Office.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Lawndale is located in the southwestern region of the Greater Los Angeles County. This “Heart of the South Bay” city is approximately fifteen miles southwest of downtown Los Angeles and five miles east of the Pacific Ocean. Lawndale encompasses approximately 1.9 square miles and is bounded by the cities of Hawthorne, Redondo Beach and Torrance. Lawndale is an urbanized, diverse, close-net community, comprised of predominately single-family homes, with a household median income of $76,213, and a median home price of $800,000. The City is well served by several regional transportation systems, including the San Diego (405) Freeway and Hawthorne Boulevard (107 Highway), which both pass through the community and provide access to major employment centers in Los Angeles County.

The City of Lawndale wasfounded in 1905 and incorporated in 1959, with a population of approximately 32,000 residents. Lawndale has transformed from a rural community to a blossoming suburban community with residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial areas that caters to the needs of the community. These establishments contribute to the local economy and add to the overall character of Lawndale.

The City of Lawndale is a General Law City, governed by a five-member, City Council and operates under a City Council/Manager form of government. The City Council, chaired by an elected mayor enacts laws and establishes policy for the City. The City Council appoints the City Manager, City Attorney, and members of the City boards, commissions, and committees. The City Council meets on the first (1st) and third (3rd) Monday of the month at 6:30 p.m. and the Planning Commission meets every second (2nd) and fourth (4th) Wednesday of the month at 6:30 p.m. More information can be found on the City’s website: www.lawndalecity.org
3 | Page
DEFINITIONS:

The following meanings are intended for the following words when used in these specifications. The word “City” means the City of Lawndale. The words “Proposer” or “Vendor” or “Contractor” means the person, firm, or corporation submitting a Proposal on these specifications or any part thereof. “Successful Proposer” means the Proposer, Vendor or Contractor will be awarded the contract. The words “purchase agreement”, “contract”, ““blanket contract” mean the contract services agreement between the Successful Proposer and the City for the purchase of goods and services.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

1. Proposals must be made on the form (Exhibit A) provided for that purpose herein and included with all submitted proposals. No substitutes to the form will be accepted.

2. Proposers must submit one (1) original complete hard copy of the Proposal with original signature, plus one (1) electronic copy in PDF format saved on a USB flash drive. All Proposals must be submitted in a sealed envelope clearly marked on lower left-hand corner “Legislative and Lobbyist Services.”

3. Proposals must be delivered in person, by U.S. Postal Service, or by a courier service such as Federal Express, UPS, etc. and must be and must be received no later than October 31, 2024, 5:00 p.m.

PST, at the address listed below:

Yvette Palomo
City of Lawndale
City Clerk’s Office
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260

4. Proposers must direct all questions, clarifications, request for information, specifications, etc. regarding the RFP in writing to Raylette Felton, Deputy CM/HR Director, by email only to [email protected]. The email subject line shall include the following: RFP Legislative and Lobbyist Services.

5. The deadline to submit any questions is: October 16, 2024, at 4:00 p.m. Responses to questions and any clarifications regarding this RFP communicated between the City and Proposers will be documented in an addendum that will be posted and made public on the city’s website. In addition, the addendum will be emailed to all Proposers that the city has on its Proposer’s list. The City will not be responsible for any oral interpretation of the RFP.

6. Any change in the RFP or its requirements made by the City will be by issuance of an addendum which will be made available on the city’s website and emailed to all recipients of the RFP, and such addendum shall be a part of the RFP requirements.

7. All Proposals shall be dated and signed by a representative authorized to enter into agreements for the proposing firm.
4 | Page

8. The City of Lawndale is not liable for any costs incurred by a Proposer in the preparation and/or presentation of the Proposal. All Proposals, associated costs, and agreements shall remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days following the deadline date for submittals.

9. All responses to the RFP accepted by the City shall become the exclusive property of the City. All Proposals accepted by the City shall become a matter of public record and shall be regarded as public, with the exception of those elements considered a legal exception to public disclosure.

10. If disclosure is required or permitted under the California Public Records Act or otherwise by law, the City shall not in any way be liable or responsible for any damages resulting from the disclosure of any such records or part thereof. If the City receives a request for any document submitted in response to this RFP, it will not assert any privileges that may exist on behalf of Proposers. In the event that a demand for disclosure of information designated as “confidential and/or proprietary” by a Proposer is made, the City as a courtesy will notify the Proposer in writing of such demand and will furnish to the Proposer a copy of the City's written response to the requestor. It would be the sole responsibility of each Proposer to assert any applicable privileges or reasons why the document should not be produced, and to obtain a court order prohibiting disclosure.

11. The City reserves the right to accept or reject any or all Proposals or portions thereof without stated cause. The City may also elect to cancel the RFP, reject all Proposals and/or re-issue a new RFP.

12. Clarification of Proposals: The City reserves the right to obtain clarification of any point in a consultant’s Proposal or obtain additional information. Any request for clarification or other correspondence related to the RFP shall be in writing or email, and a response shall be provided within two (2) business days.

13. The City is not bound to accept the Proposal with the lowest cost but may accept the Proposal that demonstrates the best ability and most qualified to meet the needs of the City. The City reserves the right to waive any formalities, defects, or irregularities, in any Proposal, response, and/or submittal where the acceptance, rejection, or waiving of such is in the best interests of the City.

14. The City reserves the right to disqualify any Proposal, before or after opening, upon evidence of collusion, intent to defraud, or any other illegal practice on the part of the consultant.

PROPOSAL SCHEDULE OF EVENTS:

The Proposal Schedule of Events represents the City's best estimate of the schedule to be followed.

Unless otherwise specified, the time-of-day deadline for the following events will be 5:00 PM PST.

The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to adjust this schedule as deemed necessary.

Notification of any adjustment to the Proposal Schedule of Events will be provided to all Proposers.

City Issues/ Release RFP September 30, 2024, by 4:00 p.m.

Deadline for Written Questions October 16, 2024, at 4:00 p.m.

City’s Responses to Questions (if applicable) October 23, 2024, at 5:00 p.m.

Deadline for Proposal Submission October 31, 2024, at 5:00 p.m.

City’s Review and Evaluate RFPs* November 27, 2024*
5 | Page
Tentative Award of Contract * December 18, 2024*
*Dates are subject to change depending on scheduled events and activities.

NONDISCRIMINATION:

The City of Lawndale requires all Proposers to comply with all federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts or administrative bodies or tribunals, including without limitation all environmental laws, employment laws, and non-discrimination laws while performing any activity or work pursuant to the agreement.

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR:

The City Attorney is not an employee of the City and will be an independent contractor. All persons employed by a firm in accordance with a contract resulting from this RFP will be employees of the firm and not the City of Lawndale. The City Council may reserve the right to retain or employ other attorneys or special counsel as may be needed, in its sole judgment, to take charge of any litigation or legal matters or to assist the City Attorney.

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

Prior to the award of any work, the City and Contractor shall enter into the written contract attached as the Standard Agreement. Please see Exhibit “B”. Proposers to this RFP are strongly advised to review all the terms and conditions of the contract.

Licenses: The selected Proposer shall hold, and provide copies upon request by the City, of valid permits, licenses, certificates, and other documents as required by the Federal, State, County, City and other governmental or regulatory bodies to legally engage in the services to be provided The selected Proposer shall obtain a City of Lawndale business license from the Finance Department before the commencement of services. In addition, the selected proposer shall be required to pay all other required license and permit fees related to doing business with the City, if applicable.

The selected proposer must notify the City immediately of any suspension, termination, lapse, nonrenewals or restriction of required licenses, certificates, or other documents which may be cause for immediate termination of the Agreement
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:

Proof of insurance is not required to be submitted with your proposal. However, all approved Certificates of Liability Insurance, Additional Insured, Primary, Non-contributory, Notice of Cancellation and Waiver of Subrogation endorsements from an insurance company with an approval rating of A-VII or greater in Best’s Rating Guide will be required prior to the City's award of the contract. The following are the standard types and minimum amounts of insurance which will be required by the City:
o Commercial General Liability Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate.
o Business Automobile Liability Insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence, combined single limit for Bodily Injury and Property Damage, including owned and non-owned and hired automobile coverage.
6 | Page
o Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance on state approved policy with liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident and disease. o Professional (Errors and omissions) Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim or per occurrence and $1,000,000 annual aggregate.

Each policy must include the City of Lawndale, its officers, agents, employees and servants as additional insureds, but only with respect to work performed under the contract. The additional insured endorsement must be provided with the certificate of insurance.

SECTION II

LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBYIST SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
SCOPE OF SERVICES:

The selected firm or individual will be responsible for providing legislative representation and lobbying services on behalf of the City. Services to be provided may include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Assist in the development and implementation of legislative priorities and strategies that are important to the City of Lawndale and successfully promotes the City’s legislative priorities. • Work collaboratively and cooperatively with City’s key staff to bring visibility to budget and legislative priorities.
• Review periodic revenue forecasts and the proposed biennial State budget. Identify funding opportunities and assess program requirements and guidelines. • Accurately and persuasively present the City’s views and initiatives. • Provide support on City efforts and initiatives beyond the legislative session to position the City to advance its objectives.
• Develop, prepare, and present position statements, exhibits, testimony, correspondence, proposed bill text, and amendments as necessary for the support, opposition, or amendment of pending legislation.
• Advocate on issues that directly or indirectly impact the City’s ability to conduct its business efficiently and cost-effectively.
• Establish, strengthen, and maintain relationships with legislators, legislative staff, State agencies, State advisory boards/committees, and other relevant stakeholders to gain support for the County’s legislative priorities.
• Attend City Council and staff meetings, as may be requested by the City Manager, in order to brief City Officials on legislative activities.
• Serve as an go-between for information to and from City and legislative agencies. • Review, analyze and keep the City informed in real time on all existing and proposed legislative policies and programs and any key developments, factors and obstacles that could affect the City’s legislative efforts.
• Comply with all Public Disclosure Commission requirements for lobbying activities. • Identify opportunities for City Officials and staff to testify before legislative committees and subcommittees with respect to proposed legislation; communicate such opportunities to the City Manager or designee in a timely manner; assist in the preparation of testimony to be given; and as requested, liaison on the City’s behalf.
7 | Page
The City may propose additional tasks as deemed necessary. Firms may also include additional services in their submitted Proposal’s. Any additional work shall be determined and negotiated, as agreed upon in the final Professional Services Agreement between the successful Proposer and the City.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:

To be eligible for consideration, Proposers must demonstrate that they have successfully performed the services identified in the Scope of Services section of this Proposal. At a minimum, Proposers qualifications should include at least five (5) or more years’ experience successfully providing state and federal lobbyist services to local public sector clients and information regarding registration as a federal lobbyist in the manner as prescribed by law in good standing concerning standards of conduct.

SECTION III

PROPOSAL FORM AND CONTENT

PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
All pages of the Proposal must be numbered consecutively. The Proposal shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages in length and must be typed in a font size no less than 12, single-spaced. Resumes, references, and licenses shall not count against this page limit. The Proposal must be organized in accordance with the list of Proposal contents.

PROPOSAL FORM AND CONTENT
Proposal must be concise, structured, presented, and formatted in the following manner:

Proposal Form (Exhibit A)
A. Cover Letter
B. Proposer Firm Background/Qualifications
C. Understanding of Scope of Services and Approach
D. Compensation and Fee Proposal
E. References
F. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
G. Additional Information
Failure to follow the specific format, to label the responses correctly, or to address all the subsections may, at the City’s sole discretion, result in the rejection of the Proposal.

All information presented in the Proposal must be relevant in response to a requirement of this RFP, must be clearly labeled, and, if not incorporated into the body of the Proposal itself, must be referenced to the appropriate place within the body of the Proposal.

A. Cover Letter
Include a cover letter signed by a duly authorized representative of the firm. The cover letter must include an introduction of the firm, firm’s interest in the project, statement attesting to the accuracy of the Proposal submittal, and the firm’s ability to provide the services noted in Section II of this RFP. In addition, the cover letter should include a statement indicating the Proposal 8 | Page
remains valid for at least 90 days from the deadline for Receipt of Proposal, with automatic extension should the Proposer be selected for negotiation.

B. Proposer Firm Background/Qualifications
This section should identify the following:
• A description of the Proposer’s background, nature of business, experience (in detail) and length of time providing legislative and lobbying services to California local government agencies.
• Description of experience analyzing, reviewing, presenting, and educating clients regarding legislation impacting their organizations.
• Recent (at least three (3) relevant) initiatives and efforts made by Proposer for a local municipality of similar scope and size of the City.
• Examples of recent successful legislative outcomes achieved for clients within the last three (3) years.
• Past success in obtaining funding and favorable legislation for government clients.

C. Understanding of Scope of Services and Approach
In this section, the Proposer should identify firm/staff extensive experience in the scope of services. More specifically, this section should identify the following:
• Understanding and approach in assisting the City in establishing and reaching its goals and priorities.
• Explain firm(s) philosophy and approach for carrying out the scope of services outlined in the RFP.
• List of person(s) designated to work with the City, and there specific areas of expertise. This section should include key staff resumes and any supporting staff as needed to meet the scope of services.
• Describe how key staff would interact with the City officials and staff. Estimate number hours key staff would dedicate to meeting the contractual obligations.

D. Compensation and Fee Proposal
Please provide a separate detailed compensation and fee proposal, in a table format, for the Scope of Services identified in this RFP. The cost proposal should provide the costs for a fiscal year cycle, July 1st through June 30th, and include the costs for the current Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (remaining 6 months) and cost for next Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The compensation and fee proposal should include either the fixed hourly rate, monthly retainer, or other billable rate for all proposed services. If a fixed monthly retainer rate is proposed, please describe in detail what is included in the retainer. The compensation and fee proposal should include an itemized list of all billable costs for the Scope of Services identified in this RFP as well as any other areas which the Proposer believes should be included but was not stipulated in this RFP. This compensation and fee proposal should also include any additional out-of-pocket expenses and costs for all tasks and services, as well as any expanded services proposed. The City will use these expenses in the selection process and reserves the right to negotiate the final fees with the selected firm or individual.

E. References
Provide five (5) current professional references from local government entities within California for whom the Proposer has provided services similar to those services requested in this RFP within the last three (3) years. Please include the name of business, name of contact person, 9 | Page
telephone, email address, and description of services provided. In addition, please include a list of all local government clients for whom you currently provide services.

F. Additional Information
Any other relevant information that the Proposer feels applicable to the evaluation of the Proposal or of their qualification for accomplishing the legal services should be included in this section.

You may use this section to address those aspects of your services that distinguish your firm from other firms.

PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION:

All submitted Proposals will be initially screened by City staff. Late, incomplete, noncompliant or proposals determined to not meet with minimum qualifications as identified in this RPF may be eliminated from further review and evaluation.

A selection committee comprised of City Officials and Staff will further evaluate the selected proposals based on experience with State and Federal legislative process, conformance and ability to meet the scope of services required, quality of the approach, strength of the proposed team, experience with State and Federal legislative process, references and demonstrated success, budget, valued return to the City, as well as other qualifications/criteria as deemed appropriate and necessary by the City. The qualifications and references for the top Proposer will be verified and reviewed.

After an initial screening and review of the Proposals, City Council may choose to interview the top candidates. If conducted, these interviews will allow the Proposer an opportunity to answer any outstanding questions relative to their Proposal.

After all evaluations of the Proposals have been completed, the City Council will select the finalist in its sole discretion. Upon selection of a finalist, the City by its proper officials shall attempt to negotiate and reach a final agreement with the finalist. If the City, for any reason, is unable to reach a final agreement with this finalist; the City then reserves the right to reject such finalist and negotiate a final agreement with another finalist who has the next most viable Proposal. 10 | Page

EXHIBIT A

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 Lawndale Blvd.

Lawndale, CA 90260
RFP NO. 2410-34

RFP PROPOSAL FORM
PROPOSER’S RESPONSES TO

RFP FOR LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBYING SERVICES
FAILURE TO COMPLETE ALL ITEMS IN THIS SECTION MAY INVALIDATE RFP.

The following Proposal is submitted to the City of Lawndale.

Proposal Submitted By:

Name of Firm Website
Address
City State Zip Code
Printed Name/Title of Contact Email
Telephone Number/Fax Number
Name of official authorized to bind firm to terms of submittal Form of Business Organization:

Please indicate the following (check one):

Corporation
Partnership
Sole Proprietorship
Other:____________________________________________________________________________ 11 | Page
Business History:

How long have you been in business under your current name and form of business organization? Years
If less than three (3) years and your company was in business under a different name, what was that name?___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ Addenda Received:

Please indicate addenda information you have received regarding this RFP: (if needed) Addendum No. _____ Date Received: ____
Addendum No. Date Received: ____
Addendum No. Date Received: ____
No Addenda received regarding this RFP: _____________________________________________ References:

Please supply the names of companies/agencies for whom you recently supplied and installed comparable goods as requested in this RFP.

Name of Company/Agency Address Person to contact/Telephone No.

Is the Compensation and Fee Proposal attached and include a cost breakdown for both current for Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (remaining 6 months) AND cost for Fiscal Year 2025-2026? _________________
12 | Page
EXHIBIT “B”

SAMPLE AGREEMENT

LA #4828-2252-8997 v1

CITY OF LAWNDALE

CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
[REPLACE THIS LINE WITH DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES]
This Contract Services Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this ____ day of __________, 20__, by and between the City of Lawndale, a municipal corporation ("City"), and ____________________________ ("Consultant"). The term Consultant includes professionals performing in a consulting capacity. The parties hereto agree as follows:

1.0 SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide the work and services specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultant warrants that all work or services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent, professional and satisfactory manner.

1.2 Consultant's Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the Consultant's proposal or bid which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All work and services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, and regulations of the City and any Federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense, such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, taxes, including applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the Consultant's performance of the services required by this Agreement; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any claim for such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant warrants that Consultant (a) has thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the work and services should be performed, and (c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.

1.6 Additional Services. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order is first given by the Contract Officer to the Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of the Consultant. Any increase in compensation must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
2 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
or reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

1.7 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the "Special Requirements" attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit "B" and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit "B" shall govern.

1.8 Environmental Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable environmental laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of Federal, State, and local governments. Consultant shall also comply with all applicable mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency.

2.0 COMPENSATION

2.1 Contract Sum. For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be compensated in accordance with the "Schedule of Compensation" attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference, but not exceeding the maximum contract amount of ________________________________ dollars ($_____________) ("Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.6. The method of compensation may include: (i) a lump sum payment upon completion, (ii) payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the services, (iii) payment for time and materials based upon the Consultant's rates as specified in the Schedule of Compensation, but not exceeding the Contract Sum or (iv) such other methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures approved by the Contract Officer in advance if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by the City.

Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services or, if Consultant is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Consultant is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed.

2.2 Method of Payment. Unless some other method of payment is specified in the Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first (1st) working day of such month, Consultant shall submit to the City, in a form approved by the City's Director of Finance, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Except as provided in Section 7.2, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and no later than forty-five (45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. City will review each invoice submitted by Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with this Agreement. If no charges or expenses are disputed, the invoice will be approved and paid. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the invoice will be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. City reserves the right to withhold future payment to Consultant if any aspect of the Consultant’s work is found substantially inadequate.

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
3 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1

2.3 Availability of Funds. It is mutually understood between the parties that this Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the City Council of the City for the purposes of this Agreement. The availability of funding is affected by matters outside the City’s control, including other governmental entities. Accordingly, the City has the option to void the whole Agreement or to amend the Agreement to reflect unanticipated reduction in funding for any reason.

3.0 PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the "Schedule of Performance" attached hereto as Exhibit "D", if any, and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including the City, if the Consultant shall, within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay, notify the Contract Officer in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if, in the judgment of the Contract Officer, such delay is justified. The Contract Officer's determination shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against the City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused; Consultant's sole remedy being extension of the Agreement pursuant to this Section.

3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Section 7.4 below, this Agreement shall begin on ____________________and continue in full force and effect until completion of the services no later than _____________________.

4.0 COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant. _____________ is hereby designated as being the representative of Consultant authorized to act on its behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith.

It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be replaced nor may his responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 Contract Officer. The City's City Manager is hereby designated as the representative of the City authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and services and to make all decisions

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
4 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
in connection therewith ("Contract Officer"). It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services and the Consultant shall refer any decisions which must be made by City to the Contract Officer. The City may designate another Contract Officer by providing written notice to Consultant.

4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for the City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the services required hereunder without the express written approval of the City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred or assigned without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Consultant taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. A prohibited transfer or assignment shall be void. No approved transfer shall release the Consultant or any surety of Consultant of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City.

4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither the City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner or means by which Consultant or employees, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain under only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to the City pursuant to this Agreement are classified by Consultant as employees. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its employees are employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. In the event that Consultant or any employee of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) to be classified as other than an independent contractor for the City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to the City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant or any staff Consultant used to provide services under this Agreement are employees of the City.

5.0 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance:
(a) Commercial General Liability Insurance. A policy of commercial general liability insurance using Insurance Services Office "Commercial General Liability" policy form CG 00 01, with an edition date prior to 2004, or the exact equivalent. Coverage for an additional insured shall not be limited to its vicarious liability. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. Limits shall be no less than $1,000,00.00 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $2,000,000.00 general aggregate.

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
5 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
(b) Workers' Compensation Insurance. A policy of workers' compensation insurance on a state-approved policy form providing statutory benefits as required by law with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for all covered losses. (c) Automotive Insurance. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per accident, combined single limit. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non owned, leased and hired cars.
(d) Professional Liability or Error and Omissions Insurance. A policy of _____________ insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 per claim with respect to loss arising from the actions of Consultant performing professional services hereunder on behalf of the City. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement and Consultant agrees to maintain continuous coverage through a period no less than three (3) years after completion of the services required by this Agreement.

All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance. The general liability policy shall name the City, its officers, employees and agents ("City Parties") as additional insureds and shall waive all rights of subrogation and contribution it may have against the City and the City's Parties and their respective insurers. Moreover, the insurance policy must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy the self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention.

All of said policies of insurance shall also provide that said insurance may be not cancelled without providing ten (10) days prior written notice by registered mail to the City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled or amended, Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation or amendment date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Section 5.1 to the Contract Officer. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until Consultant has provided City with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by City.

Consultant agrees that the provisions of this Section 5.1 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from Consultant's activities or the activities of any person or persons for which Consultant is otherwise responsible. If the Consultant’s insurance policies have higher limits and coverage than those required by this contract, the City will have access to those higher limits and coverage maintained by the Consultant.

The insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies qualified to do business in California, rated "A" or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating Guide or The Key Rating Guide, and only if they are of a financial category Class VII or better, unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of the City due to unique circumstances.

In the event that the Consultant is authorized to subcontract any portion of the work or services provided pursuant to this Agreement, the contract between the Consultant and such subcontractor shall require the subcontractor to maintain the same policies of insurance that the Consultant is required to maintain pursuant to this Section 5.1.

5.2 Indemnification.

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
6 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
(a) Indemnity for Design Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant's services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, and except for the statutory limits set forth under California Civil Code Section 2782,8 applicable to services provided by a “design professional”, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and the City's Parties from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Consultant, its officers, employees of subcontractors (or any entity or individual for which Consultant shall bear legal liability) in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.
(b) Indemnity for Other Than Design Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of design professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and City's Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including attorneys' fees and costs, court costs, defense costs and expert witness fees), where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or by any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, employees or subcontractors of Consultant.

6.0 RECORDS AND REPORTS

6.1 Reports. Consultant shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer such reports concerning the performance of the services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer shall require.

6.2 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such books and records as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer to evaluate the performance of such services. The Contract Officer shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts from such records. Such records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder, and the City shall have access to such records in the event any audit is required.

6.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, reports, records, documents and other materials prepared by Consultant, its employees, and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer or upon the termination of this Agreement and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership of such documents and materials. Consultant may retain copies of such documents for its own use and Consultant shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents or materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Except as necessary for the performance of services under this Agreement, no documents prepared under this Agreement may be released by Contractor to any other person or entity without City’s prior written approval.

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
7 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1

6.4 Confidentiality of Information. All information gained or work product produced by Contractor in performance of this Agreement will be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Contractor. Contractor may not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from the City Manager, except as may be required by law. Contractor, its officers, employees, or agents, may not, without prior written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney of City, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the services performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order will not be considered “voluntary” provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Contractor, or any officer, employee, or agent of Contractor, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City will have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Contractor for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Contractor’s conduct. Contractor must promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, or agents be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the services performed under this Agreement. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding.

Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite such response. All media and press releases, including graphic display information, must be approved and distributed solely by City, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by City. All media interviews regarding the performance of services under this Agreement are prohibited unless expressly authorized by City.

7.0 ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action.

7.2 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant's acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant's obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of the Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.3 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a nondefaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A party's consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party's consent or approval shall not

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
8 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party's consent to or approval of any subsequent act. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement.

7.4 Termination Prior to Expiration of Term. Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Consultant shall immediately cease all work or services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer. Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for the reasonable value of the work product actually produced prior to the effective date of the notice of termination and for any services authorized by the Contract Officer thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation and City shall be entitled to reimbursement for any compensation paid in excess of the services rendered.

7.5 Completion of Work After Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of the Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.2, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and the Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that the City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to the Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed the City as previously stated.

7.6 Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees, whether or not the matter proceeds to judgment, and to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, including all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation.

8.0 CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of the City shall be personally liable to the Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to the Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest; City. No officer or employee of the City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation.

8.3 Conflict of Interest; Consultant. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

Consultant shall comply with all conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, City's Conflict of Interest Code which is on file in the City Clerk's office. Accordingly, should the City Manager determine that Consultant will be performing a specialized or general service for the City and there is substantial likelihood that the Consultant's work product will be presented, either

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
9 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
written or orally, for the purpose of influencing a governmental decision, the Consultant and its officers, or employees, as applicable, shall be subject to the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

8.4 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement.

Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry.

9.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notice. Any notice or other communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, in the case of the City, to the City Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer, City of Lawndale, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California 90260, and in the case of the Consultant, to the person at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Integration; Amendment. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, agreements and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended at any time by an instrument in writing signed by both parties.

9.4 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.5 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement is binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the parties.

9.6 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will constitute one and the same instrument and will become binding upon the parties when at least one

[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
10 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
copy has been signed by both parties. This Agreement and any amendment will be considered executed when the signature page of a party is delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission.

Such electronic signatures will have the same effect as an original signature, provided that a wet signature copy is also mailed to the other party.

9.7 Modification of Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement will be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver will be void.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
11 LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of the date first written above.

CITY:

CITY OF LAWNDALE,
a municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
Robert Pullen -Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Burke Williams & Sorensen, LLP
________________________________
Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney
[NOTE TO STAFF: TWO signatures are required if the Consultant is a corporation, company or partnership. Delete this note in preparing your agreement.]
CONSULTANT:
[insert company name here]
a [California corporation]
By: ________________________________
Name: [insert name here]
Title: [insert title]
By: ________________________________
Name: [insert name here]
Title: [insert title]
Address: [insert address]
[insert address]
[insert address]
[insert address]
[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
A-1
LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
[INSERT TEXT HERE]
[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
B-1
LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
EXHIBIT "B"

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
[Delete when not applicable.]
A new Section 2.4 is added to the Agreement to read as follows:
“2.4 Prevailing Wages; Indemnification. Consultant and all subcontractors shall comply with the State Labor standards. State Labor standards provisions, including prevailing wage requirements, will be enforced such that the general rate of per diem wages (prevailing wage) shall be paid for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the contract to all workers employed in the execution of the contract for the work to be performed by _____________. The State General Prevailing Wage Determination is as established by the California Department of Industrial Relations for Los Angeles County. (Refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/PWD/Determinations/Statewide/C-TT.pdf for additional information.) The prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the City of Lawndale Department of Public Works, 4722 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90266, and are available to any interested party on request. The statutory provisions for penalties for failure to pay prevailing wages and/or failure to otherwise comply with state's wage and hour laws will be enforced. The Consultant is required to post at the job site the prevailing rate of per diem wages and other notices prescribed by regulation.

The Consultant and all subcontractors must submit electronic certified payroll records weekly directly to the Labor Commissioner (aka Division of Labor Standards Enforcement) no less than monthly and must comply with all statutory requirements relating to certified copies of payroll records, including the maintenance of the records, their certification, and their availability for inspection as required by Labor Code Section 1776 and as required under Subsection 7-2.6 of said Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

Consultant shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by the City, and hold the City and City’s Parties harmless from and against any all liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses (including attorneys' fees and court costs) arising from or as a result of any action, claim, or determination relating in any way to the failure to properly pay of prevailing wages.

Moreover, the City retains the right to settle or abandon any such the matter without the Consultant’s consent as to the City’s liabilities or rights only.” • A new Section 5.1(e) is added to the Agreement to read as follows:
(e) Cyber Liability Insurance. The cyber liability insurance must include the following coverage:
[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
B-2
LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
• Liability arising from the theft, dissemination and/or use of confidential or personally identifiable information; including credit monitoring and regulatory fines arising from such theft, dissemination or use of the confidential information. • Network security liability arising from the unauthorized use of, access to, or tampering with computer systems.
• Liability arising from the failure of technology products (software) required under the Agreement for Contractor to properly perform the services intended. • Electronic media liability arising from personal injury, plagiarism or misappropriation of ideas, domain name infringement or improper deep-linking or framing, and infringement or violation of intellectual property rights. • Liability arising from the failure to render professional services If coverage is maintained on a “claims-made” basis, Cont must maintain such coverage for an additional period of three years following termination of the Agreement. [INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
D-1
LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
EXHIBIT "C"

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
[INSERT TEXT HERE]
[INSERT CONSULTANT NAME]
D-2
LA #4828-2252-8997 v1
EXHIBIT "D"

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
[INSERT TEXT HERE]

ATTACHMENT B

ATTACHMENT C
Ci

CITY OF LAWNDALE

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
RFP NO. 2410-34

PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE AND

LOBBYING SERVICES FOR LOCAL

GOVERNMENT
Submitted by: Kiley & Associates

636 North Carolina Ave SE
Washington, DC 20003
Gregory Kiley
202-544-6897
Gregory Kiley
x
Kiley & Associates, LLC
[email protected]
15 No Addenda Received. GK
x
City of Perris
101 N. D Street
Perris, CA 92570 Wendell Bugtai, Assistant City Manager (951) 500-8528 City of Lakewood
5050 Clark Ave
Lakewood, CA 90712
City of Maywood
4319 E Slauson Avenue
Maywood CA 90270
Thaddeus McCormick, City Manager 562-866-9771
Jennifer Vasquez, City Manager (323) 562-5700
1 Table of Contents
A, Cover Letter 2
B. Proposer Firm Background/Qualifications 3
C. Understanding of Scope of Services and Approach 6
D. Compensation and Fee Proposal 10
E. References 11
F. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest 12
G. Additional Information 12

2 Kiley & Associates, LLC
636 North Carolina Ave SE
Washington, DC 20003
October 25, 2024
Yvette Palomo
City of Lawndale
City Clerk’s Office
14717 Burin Ave.

Lawndale, CA 90260
Re: RFP #2410-34 PROFESSIONAL LEGISLATIVE AND LOBBYING SERVICES FOR

LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Dear Ms. Palomo,
Kiley & Associates is pleased to respond to the City of Lawndale’s Request for Proposal (RFP) #2410-34 for Professional Legislative and Lobbying Services for Local Government posted September 30, 2024.

Founded in 2009, Kiley & Associates is a limited liability corporation incorporated in the State of Delaware. Our Federal legislative advocacy offices are based in Washington, DC.

Kiley & Associates provides legislative advocacy for cities, states and local communities and delivers political strategy from both an industry and government perspective through a solutiondriven, tailored approach. We have a proven track record of successful engagement between local government, state and federal entities to achieve community goals. Our firm is very confident we meet all the qualifications set forth in this RFP and are extremely interested in this project. We have the ability to meet all the services noted in Section II of the RFP.

Our core federally-focused team—Gregory Kiley, Jayson Braude, Kimberly VanWyhe—are eager to discuss our capabilities, experience, and ability to support the City of Lawndale. Our team is prepared to jump in and contribute on day one.

This proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than 90 days, with automatic extension should the proposer be selected for negotiation. All the information within this proposal is accurate, true and correct. There have never been any disciplinary actions taken against anyone in our firm. We stand ready to answer any questions you may have and look forward to further communications. Please feel free to contact me at (562) 818-6646 or [email protected].

Very Respectfully,
Jayson Braude
Chief Counsel
Kiley & Associates, LLC
3 B. Proposer Firm Background/Qualifications
Kiley & Associates provides legislative advocacy services, strategic funding development planning and positioning, White House, Congressional and Federal government situational awareness, due diligence, and mergers and acquisitions analysis. We help our clients identify and develop new opportunities, open doors and plan and implement strategies to secure sustained success.

We have an established, proven track record of navigating multiagency, multidimensional, complex issues. Recent efforts include work on managing interrelations between municipalities and the federal government, infrastructure funding, the American Rescue Plan guidance, Federal Emergency Management Administration reimbursements for cities, cyber threats to our nation’s infrastructure and electrical grid, environmental risks to public health, and the Department of Defense’s strategic basing decision-making.

Our team has strong ties at the federal level with both the legislative and executive branches.

Every member of our team has developed professional working relationships with Republican and Democratic Members of the Senate and House, as well as with their personal staffs, and the staffs of key Senate and House committees. Further, we have key allies within the White House staff and across the Biden-Harris Administration.

Kiley & Associates’ size, structure and personalized approach allow us to provide proactive, cost-effective representation to all our clients.

EXAMPLES OF RECENT AND ONGOING PERFORMANCE
2019-2024. City of Carson, California.
● Provided guidance and counsel to the Mayor and City Council on various matters related to infrastructure funding for various city projects, including updates on federal policy and federal grant opportunities.
● Organized a Federal Small Business Administration virtual meeting to educate Carson business owners on the Paycheck Protection Program.
● Coordinated meetings between Carson Council members, the FAA, and the Long Beach Airport regarding noise complaints from residents.
● Facilitated meetings with FEMA and the United States Treasury to ensure Carson was receiving their fair share of the municipal funding from the American Rescue Plan. ● Renewed the City’s relationship with United States Senator Alex Padilla and helped the City apply for earmarks and Community Improvement Projects (CIPs) with his office, which includes the potential of over a million dollars for parks funding within the City. ● Worked with the Federal Communications Commission to promote the Emergency Broadband Benefit to Carson residents, which will provide them up to $50 per month 4 towards broadband service for eligible households and a one-time discount of up to $100 to purchase a computer or tablet.
● At the request of the City, approached the U.S. Postal Service in Washington, DC to investigate long-running postal problems within the City of Carson with a goal to improve mail service for Carson residents.
● Worked with the City to explore renewable energy opportunities, including electric vehicle charging throughout Carson and solar power at City Hall and other City-owned buildings.
● Brought in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to help the City with the problem at the Domínguez Channel. ● Helped the City secure a $2 million federal earmark from their Congressmember for an infrastructure project at Carson Veterans Park.
● Helped the City secure Senate earmark for $1.5 million that Senator Padilla submitted to the Senate Appropriations Committee for street and landscaping improvements. 2019-2024. City of South Gate, California.
● Developed a federal funding and policy agenda for the Mayor, Council and City department heads. Created federal government agendas and provided federal outreach and funding opportunities. Provide the City with relevant hearing schedules and grant announcements.
● Arranged for City officials to meet with federal officials on the COVID-19 Funeral Assistance program which provided thousands of dollars for families in the City who lost a loved one.
● Provided the City with Congressional and White House updates detailing legislative action in Washington.
● Initiated a dialogue for the City with Union Pacific Railroad regarding trash and homelessness along a neglected rail line.
● Worked with the City to secure earmarks for $1.5 million in road improvements to Garfield Avenue, of which Congresswoman Barragán submitted to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for approval.
● Worked with South Gate, Los Angeles County Metro, and Congress for millions of dollars in funding for the West Santa Ana Branch light rail line. Started a dialogue between the City and the office of recently appointed United States Senator Alex Padilla. ● Worked with the City and the EPA to keep the South Gate Superfund sites at the forefront of the agencies’ federal priorities.
5 ● Worked closely with the City and federal officials after the January 2020 Delta Airlines Fuel Release over Southeast Los Angeles. Facilitated a Zoom call between the White House and the City of South Gate. South Gate Councilwoman Denise Diaz also participated on this extremely informative and crucial White House conversation with Intergovernmental Affairs Director Eduardo Cisneros.
● Engaged with the United States Conference of Mayors, providing South Gate a seat at the table for numerous federal decisions.
● Helped the City secure an earmark for $1 million that the Congresswoman submitted to the House Appropriations Committee for drinking water improvements. ● Helped the City secure an earmark for $1.5 million that Senator Padilla submitted to the Senate Appropriations Committee for street and landscaping improvements. ● Helped the City secure an earmark for $1.25 million that both Senator Feinstein and Senator Padilla submitted to the Senate Appropriations Committee for upgrades to the City’s Emergency Operations Center.
2020-2024. City of Lynwood, California.
● Organized meetings for the City and the Port of Los Angeles regarding the shipping backlog and the supply chain issues currently impacting the region, traffic, and the environment.
● Worked with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to secure a 1- million-dollar award for the City of Lynwood. Worked with the EPA to bring in senior White House officials to the City for a tour and meetings. ● Started an engagement for the Mayor with the United States Conference of Mayors, including outreach to the White House and Congress.
● Worked with Congressional officials and the City to ensure Lynwood is maximizing COVID-19 FEMA reimbursements and implementing the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for maximum usage.
● Helped the City with numerous matters related to compliance and accounting of ARPA.

Worked with the City to push for Federal legislation that allows for 30% of ARPA recovery funding to be spent on transportation projects or community projects. This legislation allows local officials additional flexibility to spend their own funds and extends the spending deadline by an additional two years. ● Helped the City secure an earmark for $1.3 million that their Congresswoman submitted to the House Appropriations Committee for renovations to the City’s Senior Center. ● Helped the City secure Senate earmarks that were submitted to the Senate Appropriations Committee. Senator Feinstein submitted public safety radios and Senator Padilla 6 submitted for upgrades to Lynwood Park and license plate readers, which all total over $2.5 million.

C. Understanding of Scope of Services and Approach
Kiley & Associates will collaborate with the City of Lawndale to help develop their federal legislative priorities. In fulfilling the requirements of the RFP, including onboarding, outreach advocacy, and administrative services, bill tracking, and monitoring. Our partnership with the City would include:
● Onboarding; this is an extremely important element of our engagement with our city clients. Our first action with a new client is an in-depth meeting to understand the needs of the City. We work with the City Manager and department heads to establish priorities, goals and a tailored scope of work to help our clients meet their legislative goals. ● Raising Lawndale’s profile with the California Federal House and Senate delegation, Federal Agencies, and the White House. We also can work with our partner State lobbying firm, Joe A. Gonsalves & Son if the City of Lawndale wishes to raise its profile with Governor Newsom’s Administration, State of California agencies, and the California State Assembly and Senate.
● Tracking all federal bills that impact our city clients. As an example, when an important bill is being heard in committee, we have our staff in the committee room. If needed, we can provide testimony and meet in the offices of the committee staff and Members to advocate for Lawndale’s position.
● At the federal level we will provide the City with routine written reports of legislative activity. Further, we regularly provide federal updates as Congress works on issues that impact our clients.
● In Washington, DC, we actively monitor bills and actions that impact cities and residents. We provide updates as soon as Congressional Leadership and the White House act. This active presence is something we strive for daily to help our clients reach their goals.
● Annual reviewing and working with City staff to ensure the legislative goals of the City and Council are met.
● Help the City of Lawndale with all concerns and needs related to the Metro C Line (Green) Extension and work on an advocacy plan for this matter at the direction of the Mayor, Council, and City Manager.
● Being transparent, ethical, and customer service-oriented. We are proud that clients think of us as an integral part of their business, capable of delivering the services they need when they need them. We often think of our firm as an extension of city staff and an integral part of your Washington, DC team.
7 ● Striving to protect Lawndale’s interests by changing laws or federal/state regulations as necessary.
● Coordinating with the dedicated day-to-day point of contact(s) on identifying and refining Lawndale’s top project and policy priorities for their legislative agenda (i.e. securing federal and state money for police and fire projects, water and sewer projects, roadway expansion, housing, street repairs, park projects, tourism, and policymaking). ● Targeting key allies and influential lawmakers, Congressional committees, White House policymakers, and State leaders.
● Regularly updating Lawndale on grant opportunities and issues that are pertinent to the City’s legislative priorities.
● Coordinating with the City to engage on the Federal Community Project Funding process and the State of California Member Request funding process. ● Representing the City of Lawndale at Congressional and Executive Branch meetings and hearings in Washington, DC.
● Tracking news articles and press releases on issues that will impact local governments and the City of Lawndale.
● Coordinating an annual trip for Lawndale’s elected officials and staff to Washington, DC to meet with and/or brief the Congressional delegation, White House officials, and key staff in the federal agencies.
● Helping with issues that have a state and federal nexus, which include providing comments on regulations; connecting local officials to state/federal agency professionals; and providing our expertise on funding programs, grant applications, and other legislative and agency opportunities.
● Engaging regularly with coalitions such as the National League of Cities and the United States Conference of Mayors on behalf of the City of Lawndale. Also assisting with the League of California Cities on issues when there is a federal/state overlap.

Kiley & Associates will provide written reports on ongoing activities and priorities of the City.

We anticipate regular contact and conversations with City staff to keep abreast of priorities and issues of importance to them. As part of our initial strategy kick-off meeting, we will request senior City staff and department heads to participate in the development of the strategic plan and priorities. No other specific demand on City staff is anticipated.

Proposed Staffing and Organization
The overall project management for Lawndale will be led by Kiley & Associates Chief Counsel, Jayson Braude.
8 Also joining the team will be: Gregory Kiley, President, Kiley & Associates; and Kimberly VanWyhe, Vice President, Kiley & Associates.

Our team is devoted to making sure our clients are our top priority. We are available to help or answer any questions our clients may have. We do not assign clients to a specific staffer in the firm. Instead, you have access to the firm’s full staff at any time. Whenever you and/or your staff requests something from our firm, we get to work on it immediately and report the actions back to you. We will dedicate as many hours as it takes to help the City with any needs that arise. Our client’s needs always come first, and we are responsive, often within minutes, over email, text, and phone call.

Our entire team is committed to working with the City of Lawndale for the duration of the project agreement.

Organizational Structure
Jayson Braude (7 years) Chief Counsel/Project Manager - Kiley & Associates Gregory Kiley (14 years) President - Kiley & Associates Kim VanWyhe (6 years) Vice President - Kiley & Associates Biographies
Gregory T. Kiley–President, Kiley & Associates
Gregory Kiley is President of Kiley & Associates, LLC, a Washington, DC-based policy development and advocacy firm. Since retiring from federal service, he has consulted with federal, state, and local governments, and industry and non-profit entities on national security policy and processes. He has written for the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) among others, focusing on national security and economics. Recent consulting efforts include U.S. Air Force strategic-based decision-making, community relations with the Department of Defense, and interrelations between states and the federal government.

Prior to working in the private sector, Mr. Kiley served 25 years in the federal government, concentrating on defense and national security. He spent six years as a senior professional staff member for the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC). As lead staff for two SASC subcommittees, his oversight portfolio included all military air and ground systems, military logistics and readiness, and the defense budget. His responsibilities included coordinating and conducting congressional hearings, developing and drafting legislation, and negotiating and staffing passage of annual National Defense Authorization Acts and supplemental spending bills.

Prior to the SASC, Mr. Kiley spent three years as a principal analyst for the National Security Division of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), concentrating on military aviation, logistics, and readiness issues.

Mr. Kiley began his professional career in the U.S. Air Force, culminating as a senior pilot, flying C-130 aircraft and deploying throughout the world. Greg lives in Washington, DC with his wife and three daughters.
9 Jayson J. Braude–Chief Counsel, Kiley & Associates
Jayson Braude is the Chief Counsel to Kiley & Associates. Jayson Braude grew up in the Los Angeles area and is the Grandson of former United States Congressman Glenn Anderson. Jayson worked for United States Senators Kent Conrad and Sherrod Brown in Washington, DC.

After law school, he worked as Legislative Counsel for United States Congresswoman Janice Hahn, where he staffed the Congresswoman on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. He then became the District Director for Congresswoman Nannette Diaz Barragán in her San Pedro office. Jayson has more than ten years of experience in government affairs and maintains contacts all over Capitol Hill and throughout federal, state, and local agencies.

Jayson is a graduate of UC Santa Barbara and received his law degree from Southwestern Law School in Los Angeles. Jayson is a member of the Washington Bar and resides in Washington, DC.

Kimberly J. VanWyhe–Vice President, Kiley & Associates
Kimberly is currently Vice President of Kiley & Associates, focusing on business development, policy, and strategy development. Kimberly received her BA in Political Science from St. John’s University in 2004 and received her MBA in International Business with a concentration in consulting. She also holds a certification in Global Oil and Gas Management from the Thunderbird School of Global Management.

Kimberly’s previous professional experience includes working on multiple political campaigns on both the state and federal level, working for the Alaska State Legislature as well as for the Cohen Group, a defense-oriented consulting firm founded by former Secretary of Defense William Cohen. She then served as the Director of Energy Policy at the American Action Forum, a DC think tank focusing on economic, domestic, and fiscal policy issues.

Kimberly is also the Policy Director for Building Cyber Security, a non-profit organization leading Cyber Physical standards development, education, certifications, and labeling authority, advancing the physical security, safety, and privacy in public and private sectors. Kimberly was raised in Fairbanks, Alaska, and currently resides in Washington, DC.

Interaction with City Officials and Staff and Estimation of Hours Our firm will work cooperatively with your City Manager, department heads, Mayor and City Council to ensure a high level of legislative and administrative success in Washington, DC. Our strategies will vary depending upon the issues as well as Washington, DC’s ever-changing political climate.

The estimated hours vary depending on the needs of our clients and the political landscape of the federal government. Giving an estimated number of hours is difficult. Whenever you and/or your staff request something from our firm, we get to work immediately and report the actions back to you no matter how many hours it takes. This sets us apart from the competition as we are malleable and more than willing to go above and beyond to get the job done. 10 Kiley & Associates are sensitive to the differences between clients served and proactively work to ensure conflicts of interest do not arise.

D. Compensation and Fee Proposal
Like nearly every Washington, DC based firm, we charge a monthly retainer to our City clients for our in-depth advisory and advocacy services. The agreement between the City of Lawndale and the entire team would be a total rate of $4,000 per month. This is a final not-to-exceed annual price of $48,000 per year, no additional costs will be charged over the first two years of the contract. The cost proposal covers the fiscal year cycle, July 1st through June 30th, 2026, and includes the current Fiscal Year 2024-2025 (remaining 6 months).

The retainer is all-inclusive of the federal legislative advocacy services we provide for your City.

We are always on call for our clients and engage nearly daily on numerous activities affecting cities at the federal and state level.

MONTH MONTHLY RATE
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 TOTAL
$24,000 JANUARY 1, 2025 $4,000
FEBRUARY 1, 2025 $4,000
MARCH 1, 2025 $4,000
APRIL 1, 2025 $4,000
MAY 1, 2025 $4,000
JUNE 1, 2025 $4,000
FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 TOTAL
$48,000 JULY 1, 2025 $4,000
AUGUST 1, 2025 $4,000
SEPTEMBER 1, 2025 $4,000
OCTOBER, 2025 $4,000
NOVEMBER 1, 2025 $4,000
DECEMBER 1, 2025 $4,000
JANUARY 1, 2026 $4,000
FEBRUARY 1, 2026 $4,000
MARCH 1, 2026 $4,000
APRIL 1, 2026 $4,000
MAY 1, 2026 $4,000
JUNE 1, 2026 $4,000
11 E. References
Wendell Bugtai, Assistant City Manager
City of Perris
101 N. D Street
Perris, CA 92570
[email protected]
(951) 500-8528
Services Provided: Federal Government
Advocacy
Project Dates: 2022 – Current
Darren Arakawa, Chief of Police
City of South Gate
8620 California Avenue
Southgate, CA 90280
[email protected]
(323) 563-5408
Services Provided: Federal Government
Advocacy
Project Dates: 2019 – Current
Michael Flad, Assistant City Manager
City of Jurupa Valley
8930 Limonite Avenue
Jurupa Valley, CA 92509
(818) 632-3110
[email protected]
Services Provided: Federal Government
Advocacy
Project Dates: 2021 – Current
Thaddeus McCormick, City Manager
City of Lakewood
5050 Clark Ave
Lakewood, CA 90712
562-866-9771
[email protected]
Services Provided: Federal Government
Advocacy
Project Dates: 2022 – Current
Jennifer Vasquez, City Manager
City of Maywood
4319 E Slauson Ave
Maywood, CA 90270
(323) 926-5919
[email protected]
Services Provided: Federal Government Advocacy
Project Dates: 2021 – Current
Kiley & Associates currently represents twenty California local governments at the federal level in Washington, DC., assisting with numerous Federal Government issues. Our current local government clients include:

Artesia, CA Bishop, CA Carson, CA Chino Valley Fire
District, CA Concord, CA
Indian Wells,
CA
Jurupa Valley,
CA Lakewood, CA La Quinta, CA Lomita, CA
12 Lynwood, CA Maywood, CA Milpitas, CA Paramount, CA Patterson, CA Perris, CA
Resource
Conservation
District of
Tehama
County, CA
San Juan
Bautista, CA South Gate, CA Upland, CA
F. Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
Our team is neither aware of nor limited by any conflicts of interest that would preclude our entering into a contract with or working for the City of Lawndale.

G. Additional Information
Thank you for the opportunity for Kiley & Associates to submit our proposal for full-service advocacy services to the city of Lawndale. We are honored to provide this proposal introducing the City to our firm. Our firm’s strategic approach to advocacy is custom tailored to the unique needs of each of our clients, and our team is excited about the opportunity to work with such a wonderful community.

ATTACHMENT D

!
"

#$%&'% ()"*+,-./+ ())()0(1 )()0 (20( 0)0 0 ()( 3 0
4

30 (4
0 56789:;<=>=?@8;<;6887<;?A7B<C7AA;><7=B?6D7BE687F6<;:5@G <HIJKLLKMNOP@QKRKSTLNSSUVWNXXIYXKXHI>NXZKJ8TMOYTLIG )[\]\^0_`abcc
de BTWIKJ5NQW fIVSNXI 6YYQISS >NXZ AXTXIgNR>KYI @QNOXIYBTWIh<NXLIKJ>KOXTiX;WTNL <ILIRHKOIBUWVIQh5TjBUWVIQ BTWIKJKJJNiNTLTUXHKQNkIYXKVNOYJNQWXKXIQWSKJSUVWNXXTL \[a\l _^b
^^[m
bncb\
e @LITSINOYNiTXIXHIJKLLKMNOPoiHIipKOIqr >KQRKQTXNKO @TQXOIQSHNR AKLI@QKRQNIXKQSHNR =XHIQrssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss Carpi & Clay carpiclay.com
601 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 300
Washington DC 20001
Zac Commins, Principal [email protected]
(310) 619-5792
X
Kenneth Carpi, CEO & Managing Partner

! "!
""#
$
$%$$
&'
#($'( "!
""$!)&!* +
$" ,(
""&&$

-./

$"#
$%'0
"! "!
""#
$#!((
$
&'
1&"&& '
*222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 22222222 344

456
7 8
4 9
"
!#!%&
##
#!($'&!

$
%
!

#$
$#!&!":;9<-!(

#
#/ =##
#'>?22222@&
:
%
!

#<2222 =##
#'>?@&
:
%
!

#<2222 >=##
#$
%
!

#$
$#!&!":;9<222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222 6 A

7 9
"
"00
&
'
"(%'0!
"B
%!
"($'
$
%
&
"00!
##!"&
# %'0$
#""$
C
"&
#!&!":;9? >'
(D'0
B=
%
=##$
""9
$"&%&%&BE

0
>? >'
(D'0
B=
%
=##$
""9
$"&%&%&BE

0
>? >'
(D'0
B=
%
=##$
""9
$"&%&%&BE

0
>? FG
H
IJK

5

5
4L

MK
5N557H
45
4

7N 4
57
O
5P4Q
AOH 7

75NR
5STSUVSTSWX
J5

YZJ
H
[3\]7
AL

75NR
5STSWVSTSZ^ 22222222222222222
38 Yes
x
1 10/17/24
Carpi & Clay, Inc.
601 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20001
(202) 822-8300
Response to Request for Proposals from the

CITY OF LAWNDALE
NO. 2410-34 – Professional Legislative and Lobbying
Services For Local Government
October 31, 2024
Carpi & Clay 1
A. COVER LETTER
October 31, 2024
Yvette Palomo
City Clerk’s Office
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA 90260
Dear Ms. Palomo:

Carpi & Clay is pleased to respond to the City of Lawndale’s Request for Proposals (RFP NO. 2410-34) for Professional Legislative and Lobbying Services For Local Government. This proposal outlines our qualifications, introduces our team, explains our approach, and highlights our federal advocacy successes on behalf of local governments.

We specialize in the development and implementation of successful federal legislative and government advocacy programs on behalf of public entities. The advocacy community in Washington, D.C. is highly competitive, and we are very proud that our successes on behalf of our clients have resulted in their continual decisions to remain with our firm. We possess direct, relevant experience working on the issues important to local governments from the perspective as senior staff and now as professional advocates with strong relationships with the California congressional delegation and relevant federal agencies.

Our proposal outlines a strategic approach to bolstering the City’s advocacy efforts through comprehensive federal lobbying services. To amplify your voice and influence in Washington, D.C., we offer a tailored suite of services designed to navigate the complexities of federal policymaking and secure favorable outcomes for your priorities.

We have assembled the following team for the City that is ideally suited to work on your behalf at the federal level:
 Zac Commins will serve as the co-project manager. A South Bay native and key former federal policy advisor to Senator Alex Padilla and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Zac offers a decade of federal government experience and insightful capacity for advancing policy, regulatory, and funding priorities for California public agencies, including housing and homelessness, economic development, transportation and infrastructure, and health care issues.
 Laura Morgan-Kessler will serve as the co-project manager. Her more than twenty years of federal experience serves as the foundation of her ability to develop and implement federal advocacy strategies on behalf of her clients, including several California cities.

Laura served as a legislative staffer for the late Senator Dianne Feinstein, managing a portfolio including water and wastewater, the environment, natural resources, and natural disasters.

Drawing upon our extensive experience and proven track record in federal lobbying, we propose a multifaceted approach that encompasses the following:

Carpi & Clay 2
 Issue Advocacy and Strategy Development: We will work closely with your team to identify key legislative and regulatory priorities, craft compelling advocacy messages, and develop strategic plans to advance your agenda effectively.  Relationship Building: Leveraging our established relationships with key decisionmakers, stakeholders, and congressional offices, we will facilitate targeted outreach efforts and coalition-building initiatives to garner support for your initiatives and foster productive partnerships.
 Policy Analysis and Monitoring: We will provide real-time monitoring of legislative and regulatory developments pertinent to the City’s interests, offering timely analysis and strategic guidance to adapt advocacy efforts and capitalize on emerging opportunities.  Strategic Communication: We will develop a comprehensive communication plan to effectively communicate the City’s goals, achievements, and impact to policymakers, enhancing your visibility on your projects and priorities.  Compliance and Ethical Advocacy Practices: Our firm is committed to upholding the highest standards of compliance and ethical conduct in all lobbying activities, ensuring transparency, integrity, and adherence to regulatory requirements.

Zac and Laura will use all available resources to design and implement legislative, regulatory, and funding solutions that address the City’s federal priorities. By partnering with us, the City will benefit from a dedicated team of seasoned advocates who are committed to advancing your interests and achieving tangible results in the federal policymaking arena. Together, we will navigate the intricacies of Washington, D.C. and position you for success in advocating for the resources and support necessary to deliver on the projects and programs for the City.

We attest that the information contained in this proposal is accurate and complete to the best of our knowledge. Our firm possesses the experience and expertise to meet the scope of services and qualifications outlined in Section II of the RFP, particularly with respect to federal advocacy services, which we understand is the primary focus of the City in issuing this RFP. We confirm that this proposal will remain valid for at least 90 days from the deadline for the receipt of proposals and, should our firm be selected for negotiation, we agree to an automatic extension of the proposal's validity.

Thank you for your consideration of our proposal. We welcome the opportunity to discuss our qualifications, as well as how we can help the City achieve your federal objectives.

Sincerely,
Kenneth Carpi
CEO & Managing Partner
Carpi & Clay, Inc.
601 New Jersey Avenue NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20001
Carpi & Clay 3
B. PROPOSER FIRM BACKGROUND/QUALIFICATIONS
For 38 years, the bipartisan Carpi & Clay team has represented, advanced, and protected our clients’ financial, legislative, and regulatory interests of California local governments and public agencies, equipping us to serve as successful federal advocates for the City of Lawndale. Our success is a result of our comprehensive approach to advocacy, understanding the issues, and having strategic relationships. Within the context of an ever-changing legislative and regulatory landscape, we are direct advocates for and work closely with our clients to develop a meaningful and realistic assessment of their needs and opportunities for success at the federal level. We leave no stone unturned.

Day in and day out, it is in our firm’s DNA to go the extra mile for clients. We know that each client is just as unique as the strategies that we develop and implement for them. We recognize that many firms sound the same when it comes to RFP responses. Here is what separates us from the pack:
 We use a “Principals Only” approach. The same people who prepared this proposal will be the people answering your phone calls, attending meetings, and doing the work on your behalf. We will manage and execute all aspects of the work, not associates or junior staff. We believe that being directly accountable is the best way to serve our clients.  We deliver results. Whether it is obtaining federal funding, securing legislative language, or influencing federal agencies’ regulatory actions, we have a strong record of accomplishments on behalf of our clients. For example, over the last three fiscal years, we helped our clients secure over $85 million in community project funding in the annual appropriations bills. We have also assisted in securing major infrastructure grant awards.

Our firm takes a team-oriented, full-service approach, which has helped us develop successful multiyear advocacy campaigns on behalf of our clients’ federal priorities.  We learn the issues and do not leave policy details to others. Knowing the details of your issues on a variety of policies and topics helps us establish strong, value-added relationships based on trust and integrity. This is the starting point for any successful advocacy strategy.
 We evolve, adapt, and keep our clients ahead of the curve. Now more than ever, engaging at the federal level is critical to our clients. Our ability to look “over the horizon” keeps our clients one step ahead of the curve and is critical for their success at the federal level. It is this proactive nature that has helped our clients secure federal funding and regulatory relief from numerous federal agencies, as well as ensure our clients’ access to Washington, D.C. remains strong during unprecedented times.  We provide both tailored and timely communications. Communication is key to the successful implementation of your federal advocacy goals. When it comes to communicating with our clients, we pride ourselves on ensuring that it is not only tailored to each client’s specific needs but also timely. We do not send our clients generic emails or just forward news articles. Our communication with our clients is always tailored to their specific issues. Our clients expect a high level of specialized tailored service, and we strive every day to not only meet but exceed those expectations.

Carpi & Clay 4
Having served as staff to major political leaders at the local, state, and federal levels, we have been on “both sides of the table” as advocates and as staff to public officials being lobbied. This unique perspective helps us to be creative and nimble public policy advocates. We will use all available resources to design and implement legislative, regulatory, and funding solutions that address the City’s policy, regulatory, and project priorities including:
 Crafting strategic plans;
 Building coalitions and engaging with key stakeholders;  Educating lawmakers and advocating before Congress;
 Briefing federal agency officials and political appointees;  Drafting for legislation and amendments;
 Arranging, writing, and coordinating testimony;
 Developing and implementing policy briefings;
 Preparing witnesses for committee hearings;
 Identifying funding opportunities through competitive grants and the legislative and appropriations processes;
 Navigating the processes, politics, and regulations governing competitive grants and appropriations; and
 Organizing, facilitating, and supporting “fly-ins” and client advocacy days.

We offer the City of Lawndale our long-standing relationships with decision-makers in Congress and at federal agencies to help break down barriers, find common ground, and bring about positive change. We work closely with congressional leadership, appropriations, and authorizing committees. We are also in frequent communication with the Administration, the Office of Management and Budget, and numerous federal agencies.

OUR EXPERIENCE AND SUCCESSES
Our record of accomplishments is strong. We take great care to ensure that client priorities are well orchestrated through every level of the federal process and beyond. We leverage our technical expertise and robust relationships within regional and headquarters levels of federal agencies, the White House, and Congress. Given the long review, study, and implementation schedules endemic to the federal process, it is not unusual to see shifts in the way the government does business while a project is winding its way through the authorization and appropriation processes. Our job includes foreseeing these bumps in the road and doing what is necessary to ensure that projects stay on track.

Taking a team-oriented, full-service approach, we have developed multiyear advocacy campaigns aimed at grassroots opinion leaders, government leaders, and congressional delegations to foster public and political support for client projects as priority candidates for federal funding. Below are some examples of our efforts that involved using a coordinated congressional and agency approach to achieve the desired outcomes for our clients.

Appropriations and Community Project Funding. The Fiscal Year 2022 appropriations bills allowed members of Congress for the first time in over a decade to request funding for community projects (formerly known as earmarks). Over the past three federal fiscal years, we helped our clients receive over $85 million in community project request funding, including the following:

Carpi & Clay 5
 Transportation/Infrastructure
• Norwalk Transit System Bus Stop Equity Project (City of Norwalk)—$850,000 • Carlsbad Traffic Safety Improvements (City of Carlsbad)—$850,000 • Mt. Whitney Avenue Complete Streets (Fresno County)—$3 million • Street Repaving in Tranquility (Fresno County)—$4 million • Calwa Complete Streets Project (Fresno County)—$6 million • Safe Streets Project (City of Vista) —$2.2 million
• Roadway Reconstruction and Drainage Improvements (Harris County)—$3.6 million
• King Parkway Trail (Harris County)—$1 million
• Holderrieth Road Over Willow Creek (Harris County)—$4 million • Grant Line Road Improvements (San Joaquin County)—$2.5 million • Santa Ana River Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge (City of Anaheim)—$1.7 million • Complete Streets Project (City of Vista)—$850,000
• Sidewalk and Roadway Safety Infrastructure (City of Vista)—$2.2 million • Shoreline (sea level rise) Ecosystem Protections (Port of San Diego) —$1 million • Aquaculture Infrastructure Planning/Design (Port of San Diego)—$425,000 • Pier Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project (Port of San Diego)—$2 million • Boat Harbor Infrastructure (Port of San Diego)—$3 million • Imperial Beach Pier Infrastructure (Port of San Diego)—$500,000  Water/Wastewater
• Water Resiliency Project (City of Norwalk)—$1.85 million • Septic to Sewer Conversion Project (Mission Springs Water District)—$3.85 million • Pump Station Electrical Relocation Project (Monterey One Water)—$400,000 • Cybersecurity and SCADA Upgrades (Monterey One Water)—$1.252 million • Water Storage Tank Project (Genesee County)—$3.75 million • Drinking Water/Wastewater Treatment Projects (Tulare County)—$5.7 million • Sewer Infrastructure Project (Tulare County)—$750,000  Housing/Economic Development
• Smart Cities Digital Divide Project (City of Norwalk)—$1.72 million • Maple Streets Navigation Center (San Mateo County)—$500,000 • Half Moon Bay Farmworker Homeownership Project Expansion (San Mateo County)—$3 million
• Veterans Transitional Housing (Harris County)—$1.6 million • Permanent Supportive Housing (City of Anaheim)—$500,000 • Neighborhood Revitalization Project (City of Anaheim)—$500,000  Public Safety/Homeland Security/Workforce Development • Emergency Generators for Community Resiliency (City of Norwalk)—$976,000 • Energy Sector Education & Workforce Development (City of Anaheim)—$3 million • Food Services Incubator and Job Training Center (City of Anaheim)—$500,000 • Emergency Operations Center (City of Anaheim) —$1.5 million  Parks/Open Spaces
• Public Parks (City of Anaheim)—$2 million
• Park Infrastructure and Recreation Area (San Mateo County)—$1 million Carpi & Clay 6
Competitive Federal Grants. Federal competitive grant funding is an important financial resource for California’s public agencies. Through our consistent engagement in the annual congressional appropriations process and our grants support, we have helped to create and monitor opportunities for our clients to secure critical federal grant funding, including the following:
 Transportation/Infrastructure
• RAISE grant for infrastructure improvements (Port of San Diego)—$5 million • Port Infrastructure Development grant for the installation of shore power for oceangoing vessels (Port of San Diego)—$11.25 million • America Marine Highway grant for supply chain infrastructure (Port of San Diego) —$5.5 million
• Bus and Bus Facilities grant for a bus stop equity project (City of Norwalk)—$1.055 million
• FAA grant for Meadow Fields Airport (Kern County)—$11.7 million • FAA grant for Stockton Metropolitan Airport Improvements (San Joaquin County)—$2.6 million
 Water/Wastewater
• Economic Development Administration grant for a wastewater treatment facility (City of Barstow)—$2 million
• FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities grant for water reliability project (Inland Empire Utilities Agency)—$46.3 million
• Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse grants for water recycling project (Long Beach Water Department)—$1.9 million and (Monterey One Water)—$10.316 million
• Reclamation WaterSMART Drought Response Program grants for drought resiliency projects
• (Long Beach Water Department)—$2.25 million and (Mission Springs Water District)—$300,000
• Reclamation WaterSMART Small-Scale Water Efficiency Program grant (Long Beach Water Department)—$275,000
• Reclamation WaterSMART Water and Energy Efficiency Program grants (City of Norwalk)—$492,952 and (Long Beach Water Department)—$1.9 million  Public Safety/Homeland Security
• Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grant for firefighters (City of Vista)—$1.6 million
Coronavirus Relief Fund. In the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Congress established the $150 billion Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) for states and local governments with populations above 500,000 residents. The Treasury Department was interpreting the legislation in a manner that would have prevented 12 counties throughout the country, including Fresno County, with a population above 500,000, from being eligible for funding. We took the initiative to contact the impacted counties and created an informal coalition to lobby against Treasury’s interpretation. Through conference calls, the development of advocacy tools, and a coordinated campaign targeting Congress, the White House, and the Treasury Department, we successfully reversed the interpretation. All 12 counties were deemed eligible entities, and each received a direct CRF allocation amounting to millions in fiscal relief from the Treasury Department.

Carpi & Clay 7
COVID-19 Fiscal Recovery Funds Tax Issue. The American Rescue Plan Act included $350 billion for COVID-19 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. This funding was allocated to every city and county throughout the country. The State of California chose to use a portion of its funding to establish a utility assistance program. Concerns were raised by many utilities throughout the state that this funding assistance would trigger tax implications, and thus require utilities to issue 1099 tax forms to all recipients. When our water clients raised this issue with us, we immediately began outreach to key Hill and agency contacts. We reached out to California congressional offices to raise this issue. We also coordinated with national associations to raise the profile of this concern. As a result of these efforts, the Internal Revenue Service issued clarification guidance that this funding would not be considered taxable.

COVID-19 Fiscal Recovery Funds Flexibility. As Policy Advisor to Senator Padilla, Zac coauthored bipartisan legislation to increase flexibility for counties, cities, states, territories, and tribal governments in the use of fiscal recovery funds provided by the American Rescue Plan Act. In coordination with leading organizations that represent state and local governments, including the National League of Cities and the U.S. Conference of Mayors, Zac guided the bill through complex bicameral negotiations and procedural obstacles, ultimately securing its inclusion in an omnibus appropriations bill signed into law by President Biden.

Build America, Buy America Act. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) included Build America, Buy America Act (BABAA) provisions for all projects receiving BIL funding. Complying with these provisions has been a challenge for the infrastructure community. We have worked with our clients to navigate this process at the Bureau of Reclamation and the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as advocate for the continued approach of providing waivers to the law. Additionally, we have helped our clients draft comment letters regarding BABAA and educate Members of Congress on the real-life impacts of these provisions.

Affordable Housing Federal Agency Troubleshooting. San Mateo County was in the process of closing on a 179-unit affordable house project. To close on the project, the County needed the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to approve a Subsidy Layering Review (SLR), and to do so in a very tight timeline. Without the approval of the SLR, the project would not come to fruition. On behalf of the County, we quickly engaged their Congressional delegation and put together a coordinated effort for the County’s delegation to engage and put pressure on HUD. As a result of our efforts, HUD approved the SLR in a matter of days and the County was able to close on the much-needed affordable housing project.

Community Based Violence Intervention and Prevention. Harris County, TX is making significant investments in public health approaches that address the social determinants of health and the root causes of violence. One component is a violence prevention initiative that identifies at-risk youth and provides wraparound services to the targeted population. Through our work, we identified a specific Bureau of Justice Assistance grant tailored to this County initiative. Through briefings and securing congressional endorsements, the County was awarded a $2 million discretionary grant.

Carpi & Clay 8

OUR RELATIONSHIPS
Through both our past and current client work, Carpi & Clay has worked with Members of the City’s congressional delegation, including Senator Alex Padilla, Senator Laphonza Butler, Representative Maxine Waters, and the Los Angeles County House delegation. Given our portfolio of California local government clients, we also work closely with the entire California congressional delegation, congressional leadership, appropriations, and authorizing committees, including:
 House of Representatives: Appropriations Committee; Budget Committee; Education and the Workforce Committee; Energy and Commerce Committee; Financial Services Committee; Homeland Security Committee; Judiciary Committee; Natural Resources Committee; Small Business Committee; Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and Ways and Means Committee.  Senate: Appropriations Committee; Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee; Budget Committee; Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee; Energy and Natural Resources Committee; Environment and Public Works Committee; Finance Committee; Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee; Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee; Judiciary Committee; Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee; and Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

We are also in frequent communication with the Administration, the Office of Management and Budget, and numerous federal agencies, including the following:
 Army Corps of Engineers; Council on Environmental Quality; Department of Commerce; Economic Development Administration; Department of Energy; Environmental Protection Agency; Department of Homeland Security; Federal Emergency Management Agency; Department of Housing and Urban Development; Department of the Interior; Bureau of Reclamation; National Park Service; Department of Justice; Department of Labor; Department of Transportation; Department of the Treasury; and Department of Veterans Affairs.

Additionally, we enjoy strong working relationships with national advocacy organizations, including the National League of Cities and the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

Carpi & Clay 9
C. UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF SERVICES AND APPROACH
We propose the following strategic path to help the City achieve your federal priorities and address the cross-border pollution crisis. Built into the plan is the necessary flexibility to accommodate changes in Washington, D.C., as well as issues that may emerge at the local level. When it comes to Washington, issues that appear straightforward never are. Success requires a nimble approach capable of coordinating with multiple federal agencies that operate in silos. We view our relationships with our clients as being an extension of their team and the approach below indicates the activities we will initiate on your behalf.

Strategic planning and consultation. Upon selection, we would schedule an intensive, strategic planning session with the City. We believe this is the starting point for any successful advocacy strategy. We would use this opportunity to review the City’s current agenda, discuss project and regulatory priorities with your leadership, and meet with elected officials and staff as appropriate. We would present the City with an assessment of opportunities and challenges in Washington, D.C., as well as insight into the legislative climate and political dynamics. We would also evaluate the City’s current federal presence to maximize advocacy potential and increase your federal footprint. We will work to synchronize the City’s federal agenda with what Congress and federal agencies will be doing. We will also seek to prepare for unanticipated issues that need attention but are not specifically delineated in the agenda. Once finalized, we will ensure the priority issues are communicated to Congress and federal agencies.

Maintain relationships with Congress and federal agencies. As your “boots on the ground” in Washington, D.C., we will ensure that the City’s priorities are front and center with Congress, the Administration, and relevant federal agencies. We will ensure that federal decision-makers view us as an extension of the City in Washington, D.C. and as an available resource to them at any time to discuss funding, legislative, and regulatory priorities. Additionally, we will use our extensive network of congressional and federal agency relationships to extend the City’s reach well beyond its congressional delegation. We will work to help raise your profile with the federal government and be viewed as a thought leader on important issues. We work regularly with authorizing and appropriating committee staff in both the House and the Senate. We are also in frequent communication with the Administration, numerous federal agencies, and the Office of Management and Budget.

Legislative and regulatory advocacy. We closely track all federal activity as it relates to local governments. We will keep the City abreast of any legislation or potential legislation that could affect your residents. We will provide legislative text, detailed bill analysis, and status updates on federal legislation of importance. We also monitor the Federal Register daily for any new federal agency regulatory actions that may be of interest to our clients. We will ensure that the City is made aware of all pending federal regulatory actions that could have either a positive or negative impact on your operations or your residents. We will prepare detailed and thoughtful comments in response to proposed federal agency regulations, sharing these comments with your congressional delegation.

Federal funding advocacy and grant support. The City does not have unlimited financial resources which makes federal funding critical for your operations and to maintain services for your residents. We will closely monitor the President’s budget and the annual congressional appropriations process, providing the City with a detailed summary and funding levels of Carpi & Clay 10
programs of importance. We will work with the City to ensure that Senator Padilla, California’s next Senator, and Representative Waters are aware of the City’s annual appropriations priorities and community project requests, complete and submit all appropriations request forms.

Additionally, we understand the dynamics of the federal grant process and have secured numerous grants for local communities. Our work has involved identifying appropriate grants, assisting with the preparation and submittal of grants, and the necessary advocacy with federal agencies. We will work with your grant writers to tailor a grants management strategy that looks to specific programs and expected grant offerings. We will provide timely notice of federal grant announcements and share all materials relevant to the grants. We will also organize meetings for you with those federal agency decision-makers. This will help the City position its grant proposals, understand an agency’s priority focus for funding, and develop relationships with federal decision-makers.

In-person visits. You are your own best advocates. We want the City to be personally involved in your Washington, D.C. advocacy. We will support all facets of the City’s federal advocacy trips to ensure the most advantageous use of your time. Whether traveling to Washington, D.C. or doing a virtual visit, we will accommodate your needs. Working with the City, we will prepare a list of potential dates and targeted meetings in Washington, D.C. We can help schedule meetings, including meetings with the City’s congressional delegation, key committee staff, and relevant federal agency officials. We will keep the City apprised of meetings as they are secured. In addition, we will assist in the preparation of associated white papers, letters, and talking points.

We will accompany the City to all your meetings with federal decision-makers and ensure that all action items are captured and addressed.

Communication. We believe that communication is key to the successful implementation of your federal advocacy goals. We maintain regular contact with our clients, both through email and phone calls. This accessibility and communication will be critical to the success of the City’s legislative platform. We recognize both short- and long-term trends in funding opportunities before they become apparent and will work with the City to connect priorities with those federal opportunities. We will monitor key legislation, congressional hearings, grant opportunities, and regulations that affect the City and your priorities. We are committed to providing regular written reports that outline the monitoring of key legislative initiatives related to the City’s legislative agenda. We will closely monitor legislative and regulatory developments in Washington, D.C. (including tracking discussions, drafts, emerging issues, research reports, and other activities that may ultimately affect legislation, regulations, or other client interests) and promptly convey through email, conference call, or report, as directed, whatever we learn that is important to the City. We will use all available technology to bridge the geographic and temporal divide separating California and Washington, D.C.

OUR TEAM
Our team has significant advocacy experience working on behalf of California cities and other public entities. We understand the fundamental issues facing local governments and recognize the considerable financial, operational, and political challenges they balance daily. We have worked—inside and outside of government—to help agencies like the City overcome those challenges.

Our professional staff members represent bipartisan achievement and diverse issue interests, with complementary expertise and backgrounds. Throughout our individual careers and as a Carpi & Clay 11
firm, we have worked for and with Democratic and Republican Administrations, Congress, mayors, governors, and other elected and appointed officials. We understand the challenges and issues facing local governments at the federal level and have many years of direct experience working on those issues with corresponding accomplishments and achievements.

We have the in-house expertise and political understanding to achieve the City’s federal priorities.

Each member of our team is highly respected within the Washington, D.C. advocacy community.

Zac Commins and Laura Morgan-Kessler will serve as the co-project managers for Carpi & Clay’s federal efforts for the City. They will be responsible for ensuring that all timelines are met and that all work products are of the highest quality.

Utilizing our “Principals Only” approach, Carpi & Clay guarantees that Zac and Laura will be directly accessible to the City and will provide prompt responses and dedicated support to meet the City’s federal needs. Our commitment is to prioritize the City’s interests and ensure continuous, effective communication. While we understand the importance of specifying an estimated number of hours our team would dedicate to meeting the contractual obligations, we believe the quality of our representation and our unwavering availability are the true measures of our commitment to the City’s success.

Zac Commins
Zac Commins brings a decade of experience working on federal policy, funding, and regulatory matters to Carpi & Clay. With previous roles spanning Capitol Hill and local government, Zac brings invaluable expertise in government relations, policy advocacy, and strategic counsel.

His track record of effectively navigating complex political landscapes and building bipartisan coalitions will make him instrumental in furthering Carpi & Clay’s commitment to providing exceptional service to our clients.

Zac most recently served as Executive Officer of Intergovernmental Affairs to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. In this role, he played a pivotal role in shaping the City’s advocacy agenda, fostering crucial partnerships across all levels of government, and aligning priorities with various City departments and offices. Zac led the Intergovernmental Affairs team’s efforts to maximize federal and state funding for the City, while facilitating advocacy trips, visits from dignitaries, large-scale policy events, and participation in national conferences.

As Policy Advisor to Senator Alex Padilla, Zac spearheaded several of the office’s signature legislative achievements, including central provisions incorporated in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. He co-led bipartisan efforts to successfully enact legislation to provide flexibility to state, local, tribal, and territorial governments in the use of billions of dollars in fiscal recovery funds. His extensive collaboration with diverse stakeholders, including government agencies and nonprofits, underscored his commitment to advancing a myriad of policy priorities, securing grant awards, and facilitating congressionally directed spending.

Zac started his career in Washington, D.C. in the U.S. House of Representatives, including serving as a legislative director to a Member of Congress and handling housing and health care issues. Zac has prior experience providing comprehensive government affairs services to public sector and nonprofit clients. Zac graduated with honors from the University of California, Berkeley with a bachelor’s degree in political science.

Carpi & Clay 12
Laura Morgan-Kessler
When it comes to unrivaled dedication, subject-matter experience, and commitment to success in advocating for public agencies, Laura MorganKessler stands out. Her comprehensive knowledge spans a wide swath of critical issues including water and wastewater infrastructure, transportation, economic development, homeland security, public safety, natural resources, the environment, energy, housing, and national service.

Laura's passion for her clients' issues is much more than just a part of her work; it is the essence of it. Her relentless pursuit of excellence continues to create lasting impacts, not only for her clients but for the communities they serve. Her unmatched dedication, combined with her profound expertise, places her at the forefront of her field.

What continues to set Laura apart is her proven ability to continually help her clients find successes at the federal level. She has secured over $40 million in federal funding for her clients’ community project requests in the annual appropriations bills in just the last three years. She has worked with her clients to successfully navigate the implementation of the American Rescue Plan Act, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, and the Inflation Reduction Act. She has achieved programmatic funding increases for programs such as the Foster Grandparent Program and the Senior Companion Program. These successes are directly related to her unparalleled understanding of congressional and federal agency actions, coupled with her ability to forge strong partnerships with Congress, congressional committees, and federal agencies.

Laura’s more than twenty years of federal experience serves as the foundation of her ability to develop and implement federal advocacy strategies on behalf of her clients. She began her time in Washington, D.C. as a legislative staff member for Senator Dianne Feinstein. Her portfolio of issues centered around a topic of critical importance to Californians: infrastructure. During her tenure on Capitol Hill, she managed a portfolio of issues including transportation, water and wastewater, energy, natural resources, the environment, and natural disasters.

Outside of the office, Laura dedicates her time to empowering female professionals. She currently serves as a board member for Women in Government Relations (WGR), an organization that supports 1,200 women government relations professionals throughout the country. She also serves as a mentor in WGR’s annual mentorship program.

Laura graduated from Wake Forest University with a Bachelor of Arts in political science and a minor in sociology. Her time as a Demon Deacon laid the foundation for her career in federal policy and advocacy, as well as her lifelong commitment to uphold her alma mater’s motto of pro humanitate.

Carpi & Clay 13

ZAC COMMINS
[email protected] l (310) 619-5792

EXPERIENCE
Carpi & Clay 2024-Present
Principal
 Develops and executes effective federal advocacy strategies to achieve clients’ targeted objectives.  Provides critical and timely insights on Congressional and federal agency actions.

Office of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 2023-2024
Executive Officer of Intergovernmental Affairs
 Served as a key advisor to the Mayor in carrying out the City’s Intergovernmental Affairs functions, fostered crucial partnerships across all levels of government to advance the City’s advocacy agenda, and collaborated with various City departments and offices to align priorities.  Led efforts to maximize federal funding opportunities, including more than doubling the amount of congressionally directed spending allocated to the City.  Facilitated advocacy trips, visits from dignitaries, and comprehensive policy events.

Office of U.S. Senator Alex Padilla 2021-2023
Policy Advisor
 Served as the Senator’s principal advisor on banking, budget, economic development, small business, tax, trade, and transportation policy.
 Co-authored bipartisan legislation to allow flexibility to state, local, and tribal governments in their use of federal fiscal recovery funds, included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023.  Collaborated with the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to shape language included in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, including supporting zero-emission buses and trucks, climate resiliency, transportation equity, bridge enhancements, and wildlife crossings.  Led the Senator’s efforts on the Senate Budget Committee, including the budget reconciliation process and advancement of the Inflation Reduction Act and the American Rescue Plan Act.  Worked closely with state and local governments regarding policy priorities, grant opportunities, and congressionally directed spending requests.

Office of U.S. Representative Harley Rouda 2019-2021
Legislative Director (2019-2021)
Senior Legislative Assistant (2019)
 Led the agenda for one of the most legislatively productive members in the 116th Congress, including advancing the most sponsored legislation through the House of any freshman office.  Served as principal advisor for his role on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee as well as appropriations, banking, budget, economic development, health, housing, judiciary, and tax policy.

Townsend Public Affairs 2018-2019
Associate
 Served as a federal advocate for California cities, counties, special districts, and nonprofits.

Office of U.S. Representative Eric Swalwell 2015-2017
Legislative Assistant (2016-2017)
Legislative Aide (2015-2016)
Staff Assistant/Legislative Correspondent (2015)

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), Political Science 2011-2015
University of California, Berkeley, CA
Honors with Distinction, Phi Beta Kappa
Carpi & Clay 14

LAURA MORGAN-KESSLER
(703) 298-6846 — [email protected]

EXPERIENCE
Carpi & Clay, Inc., Washington, D.C.

Partner 10/22-Present
Principal 5/18-10/22
• Manages a diverse client portfolio including cities, counties, drinking water and clean water utilities, trade associations, and non-profit organizations. • Secured over $43 million for clients in community project requests funds from FY22-FY24. • Provides timely and strategic intelligence on Congressional and federal agency actions and helps clients develop and implement federal advocacy strategies to accomplish specific goals. • Maintains strong working relationships with Members of Congress and their staff, Congressional Committees, and federal agencies including the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
• Helps clients navigate the federal legislative and regulatory processes. • Works to develop creative and out-of-the-box solutions to federal issues and roadblocks. • Engages regularly with organizations such as the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National League of Cities, the National Association of Counties, and the Association of California Water Agencies.

Van Scoyoc Associates, Inc., Washington, D.C.

Director, Government Relations 12/09-5/18
• Provided comprehensive federal advocacy services for a portfolio of public entity clients. • Oversaw and organized Congressional and federal agency advocacy fly-ins. • Drafted legislation that gained bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate. • Wrote proposals and interview presentations that resulted in successfully obtaining new clients. • Led efforts in 2012 to build coalition of affected stakeholders to remove the residual risk requirement from the National Flood Insurance Program authorization bill.

Manager, Government Relations 12/06-12/09
• Collaborated with clients to draft and implement a federal relations strategy. • Drafted Congressional correspondence, legislative language, and regulatory comments. • Tracked appropriations bills, monitored legislation, and attended hearings.

Office of United States Senator Dianne Feinstein, Washington, D.C.

Legislative Correspondent 6/04-12/06
• Composed speeches, drafted statements, and assembled floor charts. • Comprised Daily Energy Report for Senator Feinstein and legislative staff.

Staff Assistant 6/03-6/04
• Researched legislation pertaining to energy and the environment. • Answered phones, distributed mail, and responded to constituent letters.

EDUCATION Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 1999-2003 Bachelor of Arts in Political Science; Minor in Sociology

MEMBERSHIP
Women in Government Relations
• Director, Board of Directors (7/22-6/24)
• Chair of Congressional Outreach Committee (7/21-6/22) • Co-Leader Transportation & Infrastructure Task Force (7/19-6/21) Carpi & Clay 15
D. COMPENSATION AND FEE PROPOSAL
Fixed-fee monthly retainers are the standard for federal advocacy work, and we strongly believe they provide the best value to our clients. Monthly retainer agreements allow for our communication with our clients and on behalf of our clients to be unencumbered. We have also found that this financial arrangement provides our clients with a strong continuity of service.

Based on our understanding of your federal needs, Carpi & Clay proposes to provide the City with comprehensive federal advocacy services for a fixed monthly retainer of $5,000. Longdistance travel at the direction of the City would be billed at cost outside of the monthly retainer.

Period Proposed Cost
Remainder of Fiscal Year 2024-25 (1/1/25-6/30/25) $30,000 Fiscal Year 2025-26 (7/1/25-6/30/26) $60,000
Carpi & Clay 16
E. REFERENCES
Carpi & Clay and our advocates have a proud history representing California local governments at the federal level. Below are five references that demonstrate our knowledge and experience working on behalf of public agencies.
 City of Irvine. Carpi & Clay has provided comprehensive federal legislative services since 2022. We have worked with the City to support several priorities including infrastructure, public safety, housing, and economic development.

Michelle Grettenberg
Assistant City Manager
1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 724-6252
[email protected]
 City of Norwalk. Carpi & Clay has provided comprehensive federal legislative services for the City since 2018. We have helped the City secure federal funding for critical projects and programs, including bus stop improvements, energy and water resiliency enhancements, and digital infrastructure installations in public parks and facilities.

Additionally, we support the City’s efforts with its water reliability project with the Army Corps of Engineers.

Salpy Kabaklian Slentz
Management Analyst
12700 Norwalk Blvd, Norwalk, CA 90650
(562) 929-5303
[email protected]
 City of Newport Beach. Carpi & Clay has represented the City of Newport Beach on federal transportation matters since 2019. Zac serves the City’s federal advocacy efforts on aviation, including engagement with the Department of Transportation, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and Congress. We have been successful in incorporating language into legislation to advance the City’s goals, including creating a new program in the recently enacted FAA reauthorization designed to help the agency more effectively carry out its community engagement activities.

Tara Finnigan
Deputy City Manager
100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 644-3035
[email protected]
 City of Carlsbad. Carpi & Clay has provided comprehensive federal legislative services for the City since 2022. We have helped the City secure federal funding for critical infrastructure and housing projects. Additionally, we are working to help the City support important legislation related to veterans housing needs and aviation noise issues.

Carpi & Clay 17
Jason Haber
Intergovernmental Affairs Director
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008
(442) 339-2958
[email protected]
 City of Los Angeles. Zac served as Executive Officer of Intergovernmental Affairs for Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. In this position, he played a pivotal role in shaping the City’s advocacy agenda, fostering crucial partnerships across all levels of government, and aligning priorities with various City departments and offices. He also helped guide the City’s efforts to maximize federal funding opportunities, including more than doubling the amount of congressionally directed spending allocated to the City.

Joey Freeman
Deputy Mayor of Intergovernmental Affairs
200 N. Spring St, Room 303, Los Angeles, CA 90012
(818) 802-1425
[email protected]
In addition, please see a list below of all local government clients for whom Carpi & Clay currently provides services.

Barstow Community College District Jurupa Community Services District City of Anaheim, CA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority City of Carlsbad, CA Long Beach Utilities
City of Encinitas, CA Marin County Transit District
City of Irvine, CA Mission Springs Water District
City of Morgantown, WV Monterey One Water
City of Newport Beach, CA Morro Bay Harbor Department
City of Norwalk, CA Multnomah County Drainage District
City of Rocklin, CA Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District
City of Santa Barbara, CA Pajaro Regional Flood Management Agency City of Vista, CA Port of Long Beach
County of Fresno, CA Port of San Diego
County of Los Angeles Public Works Port of Santa Cruz
County of Marin, CA Port of Stockton
County of San Mateo, CA Port San Luis Harbor District
County of San Joaquin, CA Sacramento Regional Transit District County of Stanislaus, CA Santa Clara Valley Water District County of Tulare, CA Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency
Genesee County, NY Transbay Joint Powers Authority
Harris County, TX Ventura Port District
Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Carpi & Clay 18
F. DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Carpi & Clay does not have any conflicts of interest with representation of the City of Lawndale with our existing client portfolio.

Our clients are our top priority, and we take great pride in protecting our long-term relationships with them. To avoid encountering any potential conflicts between our existing clients, we go through a comprehensive internal vetting process prior to pursuing any new client opportunities.

For example, prior to our firm submitting a response to this RFP, we looked at our existing client portfolio to ensure that our potential work on behalf of the City would not create a conflict for any existing clients.

Furthermore, Carpi & Clay complies with all federal, state, and local conflict of interest laws, statutes, regulations, and reporting requirements. We value our reputation for integrity and adhere to the strictest self-imposed guidelines for ethical behavior.

ATTACHMENT E

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 1 COST PROPOSAL:

Professional Legislative &
Lobbying Services for Local
Government
RFP No. 2410-34
October 31, 2024
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 1

COST PROPOSAL
ALL-INCLUSIVE RETAINER:

DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES MONTHLY FEE
Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services $8,000*
• Conduct Detailed Orientation Included
• Develop Legislative Strategy Included
• Implement the Legislative Strategy Included
• Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships Included
• Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan Included • Coordinate Advocacy Trips Included
• Track Legislation Included
• Craft Testimony and Position Letters Included
• Draft Bill Language Included
• State Budget Funding Opportunities Included
• Federal Earmark Opportunities Included
• Identify Funding Opportunities Included
• Provide Progress Reports Included
• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports Included *The monthly fee includes all reasonable business and travel expenses.

NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT FOR REMAINING FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025 (6 MONTHS): $48,000 NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 (1 YEAR): $96,000 Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 1 Proposal for
Professional Legislative &
Lobbying Services for Local
Government
RFP No. 2410-34
October 31, 2024
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents............................................................................................................ 1 Cover Letter .................................................................................................................... 2 Firm Background & Qualifications .................................................................................. 3 Understanding of Scope of Services & Approach ........................................................... 9 Compensation & Cost Proposal ........................................... Submitted in a Separate File References.................................................................................................................... 22 Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest.................................................................................. 25 Additional Information.................................................................................................... 26 Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 2 October 31, 2024
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
City of Lawndale
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA 90260
Dear Ms. Palomo:

Thank you for the opportunity for Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. (“TPA”) to submit our proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services to the City of Lawndale (“City”).

Since its inception in 1998, TPA has earned the reputation as a Champion for Better Communities by providing the experience, resources, and relationships expected from a premier legislative advocacy and grant writing firm while also giving clients the unique brand of customer service they deserve: personal attention, maximum accessibility, and passion for their mission.

Our strategic approach to advocacy and funding is tailored to meet the individual needs of each client by leveraging the breadth and depth of our team as well as our vast network of relationships with key stakeholders and decision makers.

Utilizing this method on behalf of our clients, TPA has shepherded over 150 legislative and regulatory proposals into law and secured over $3.2 billion in competitive funding from state, federal, and local government agencies as well as nonprofit foundations and private companies.

Thank you again for your interest in our firm and your consideration of this proposal. TPA attests to the accuracy of this proposal, as well as the firm’s ability to provide the services noted in Section II of the RFP. TPA also affirms that this proposal will remain valid for at least 90 days from the deadline. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. We would be honored to serve the City of Lawndale.

Yours truly,
Christopher Townsend (Authorized to Bind the Firm)
President
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 3

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS

FIRM DESCRIPTION
TPA is a state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing firm that provides lobbying and funding services to public agencies and nonprofit organizations throughout California.
• Founder/Owner/President: Christopher Townsend
• Advocacy Success: Shepherded over 150 client-sponsored legislative proposals into law
• Funding Success: Over $3.2 billion in state, federal, and local government grants as well as grants from nonprofit organizations and private companies • Longevity: 26 years (founded in 1998)
• Number of Employees: 23
• Number of Registered State and Federal Lobbyists and Grant Writers: 19 • Number of Offices: Five
o TPA State Capitol Office, Sacramento
o TPA Federal Office, Washington, DC
o TPA Northern California Office, Oakland
o TPA Central California Office, Fresno
o TPA Southern California Office, Newport Beach
• Types of Clients:
o City Governments
o County Governments
o Water and Sanitation Districts
o Transportation Districts
o K–12 School Districts
o Community College Districts
o Parks and Recreation Districts
o Fire Protection Districts
o Museums, Science Centers, and Cultural Facilities
• Areas of Specialization:
o Local Governance (Cities, Counties, Special Districts) o Transportation Policy and Infrastructure
o Water and Sanitation Policy and Infrastructure
o Education Policy and Infrastructure
o Housing and Economic Development
o Parks and Community Facilities (Recreational, Cultural, Historical) o Energy, Environment, and Natural Resources
o Public Safety
o Budget and Finance
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 4

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS
• Ranking by Revenue Reported to the California Secretary of State:
o 8th of 491 Firms Registered for the 2023–24 Legislative Session o 99th Percentile
• More California public agencies have hired TPA to represent them in Washington, DC than any other advocacy firm in the nation.

DEMONSTRATED KNOWLEDGE
RELEVANT STATE LEGISLATIVE ACHIEVEMENTS:

1. CITY OF OAKLAND: STATE BUDGET FUNDING ADVOCACY
TPA worked with the City of Oakland and State Assembly Member Mia Bonta to help secure $5,000,000 in funding for Fire State 4 in fiscal year 2023 in the State Budget. The funding is to help construct critical healthy and safety improvements at the Fire Station to ensure its ongoing operation and useful life.

2. AB 1285 (WICKS): HOMELESS HOUSING, ASSISTANCE, AND PREVENTION

PROGRAM AND ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUNDING PROGRAM
TPA partnered with the City of Berkeley to sponsor AB 1285, a significant piece of legislation aimed at enhancing the coordination of state funding programs to address homelessness more effectively. AB 1285 mandates that cities, counties, and Continuums of Care collaborate on how referrals to permanent housing through the Coordinated Entry System prioritize individuals living in encampments. This approach ensures that those most in need receive timely access to permanent housing solutions.

At the start of the legislative session, TPA worked closely with the City of Berkeley to identify the relevant government code section and assist in drafting the bill language. TPA then collaborated with the City to create fact sheets and other materials that clearly articulated the purpose and necessity of the legislation, which were used to educate committee members and their staff.

As the bill progressed through the Legislature, TPA engaged with senior committee staff members to fine-tune the language of the bill, ensuring it was both effective and practical.

TPA also provided verbal lead testimony during policy committee hearings and equipped the bill's author with targeted speaking points for both committee hearings and final floor votes.

One of the most significant aspects of AB 1285 is its focus on collaboration, which is particularly beneficial for smaller cities that do not receive direct allocations of stateprogrammed homeless resources. By requiring partnerships between cities, counties, and Continuums of Care, the bill fosters a more inclusive and unified approach to addressing homelessness. This collaborative language ensures that even smaller municipalities, which might otherwise be overlooked, can have a say in the prioritization of housing resources, effectively integrating their needs into the broader state strategy.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 5

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS
Understanding the bill's potential to benefit cities across the state, TPA helped form a coalition of supportive cities, which played a crucial role in the bill's successful passage.

This coalition demonstrated broad-based support and highlighted the bill’s importance to cities of all sizes, emphasizing that a unified approach is essential for effectively tackling homelessness statewide.

The Governor's decision to sign AB 1285 into law underscores its importance as part of his major homelessness and behavioral health reform package. The measure's emphasis on coordination and collaboration sets a precedent for future efforts, ensuring that all cities, regardless of size or direct funding allocations, are actively involved in the fight against homelessness. This collaborative framework is essential for creating a more equitable and effective system that addresses the complex and urgent issue of homelessness throughout California.

3. BROWN ACT FLEXIBILITY AND EXPANSION EFFORTS
Throughout the 2023-2024 legislative session, TPA worked closely with several clients to sponsor a suite of governance flexibility bills that implement common sense reforms to the Brown Act and the Public Records Act.

Specifically, AB 2302 (Addis) would clarify and guarantee in law that local governments are afforded the full flexibility given to them in AB 2449 (Rubio) in 2022. Some cities were unable to access the full capabilities and flexibility of participating in meetings remotely due to the unintended consequences of specific administrative proceedings. TPA helped the client identify the issue and draft language to address the concern. TPA then worked to build a coalition of similar cities and advocate for its passage. AB 2302 has passed the Legislature and is currently on the Governor’s desk.

Furthermore, TPA helped sponsor SB 1034 (Seyarto), which added an exemption in Public Records Act law to allow for additional time to respond to requests during times of emergency where staffing is limited, and public facilities are closed. This commonsense reform had a wide variety of stakeholders supporting and was signed into law by the Governor in 2024.

Finally, in 2024, TPA helped clarify in Government Code the definition of attestation of digital signatures for use on official city documents such as ordnances or minutes. This clarification gives clear directions to cities looking to use digital signatures for ease of filing paperwork.

4. AB 2496 (PETRIE-NORRIS): LOUD VEHICLE NOISE
TPA worked with a coalition of Orange County cities, including Huntington Beach, Irvine, and Laguna Beach, to sponsor AB 2496 (Petrie-Norris). The legislation works to address the prevalence of loud vehicle noise in communities. Specifically, the bill requires violators of the existing loud vehicle noise laws to prove they have addressed the problem through Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 6

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS
vehicle modification before receiving their next vehicle registration. TPA worked closely with the coalition and Assembly Member Petrie-Norris’ staff to craft language, organize letters of support and verbal testimony, and hold meetings with legislators to ensure it passed every policy and fiscal committee hurdle. The bill was approved by the Legislature in the final days of the 2022 Legislative Session and was signed into law by Governor Newsom. The Governor, in a demonstration of his appreciation for the legislation, highlighted the bill in the public overview of his final legislative actions for the 2022 Legislative Session.

RELEVANT FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ACHIEVEMENTS:

1. CITY OF BERKELEY: FEDERAL EARMARK FUNDING ADVOCACY
TPA worked with the City of Berkeley and Congresswoman Barbara Lee to help secure $3,000,000 in federal funding for the East Bay Regional Fire Training Facility in fiscal year 2025. The funding would be used to construct the East Bay Regional Fire Training Facility, which would serve Northern Alameda and Western Contra Costa County first responders with a facility that will become an Accredited Local Academy through the State Fire Marshal. This project will also serve as a workforce training center that will enhance the regional ability to recruit and train diverse members of the community for careers in public safety in a time when recruitment of emergency responders is extremely challenging.

2. CITY OF ONTARIO: WRDA FUNDING AUTHORIZATION
During the 2022 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) legislative process, TPA advocated aggressively for the inclusion of a $40.7 million funding authorization on behalf of the City of Ontario for its water recycling and water supply priorities. The bill, which is reconsidered by Congress every two years, authorizes much-needed investments in projects and programs of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. As a result of TPA’s diligent federal advocacy efforts, Ontario’s critical Well Treatment Facility and Euclid Avenue Recycled Water System Expansion projects will undergo expedited feasibility and environmental studies before the beginning of construction. TPA will continue to work with Ontario’s Congressional Delegation to secure appropriations funding for the competition of these projects, demonstrating our firm’s comprehensive approach and commitment to ensure success from the onset of project authorization to completion.

3. CITY OF OAKLAND: AFFORDABLE HOUSING FEDERAL ADVOCACY On behalf of the City of Oakland, TPA engaged closely with Senator Feinstein’s staff to monitor and decipher a decision from HUD on affordable housing priorities for current and past residents. HUD had recently rejected a plan in San Francisco to open a new complex of affordable housing and implement a priority system that favored those who had lived in the neighborhood previously, thus preventing a major shift toward gentrification. When HUD rejected the plan because it violated the Fair Housing Act, TPA worked closely with the Council President’s office and the California legislative delegation to determine Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 7

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS
whether similar prioritization plans implemented in Oakland might also violate the Fair Housing Act and whether the City was therefore at risk of legal action. Fortunately, TPA was able to determine that the City’s plan contained a key and essential difference, allowing it to avoid the same assessment by HUD. In maintaining consistent lines of communication with stakeholders, TPA was able to mitigate risk to the City of Oakland and its residents of affordable housing, while also ensuring that key figures in affordable housing discussions were aware of Oakland’s important efforts in this arena.

4. SAN PABLO PUBLIC INTEREST LAND CONVEYANCE ADVOCACY
TPA is currently advocating for the transfer of an Army Reserve Center site to the City of San Pablo. The armory is inactive, and the City sought to explore the possibility of acquiring the land to use as a new public works corporation yard. TPA identified that a public interest land conveyance could be legislated for this purpose through the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and engaged the staff of Representative John Garamendi and the Department of Defense (DoD). DoD sought to rush a transfer to the Department of Homeland Security but working through the House Armed Services Committee, TPA successfully paused the transfer by inserting report language into the House NDAA. This language requires the DoD to provide a briefing to the committee on their processes, potential uses of the land, and a description of public engagement.

5. COVID-19 LOCAL GOVERNANCE MESSAGING AND FUNDING ADVOCACY Through the COVID-19 pandemic, TPA led a statewide effort to advocate for increased local relief funding in the passage of the CARES Act and the American Rescue Plan (ARPA). TPA worked with its municipal clients, as well as in partnership with the California Mayors Coalition to ensure funding was made available for local jurisdictions. TPA coordinated with the National League of Cities and the White House to utilize and distribute TPA templates, models, and language regarding COVID-19 messaging. TPA facilitated conversations between the Department of Treasury and local public agencies regarding the implementation and reporting of CARES Act and ARPA funds and was ultimately successful in securing direct funding for local jurisdictions as part of the COVID relief packages.

6. MERCED COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS BUY AMERICA

WAIVERS
TPA advocacy resulted in ten partial Buy America waivers for MCAG. These waivers allowed five cities in Merced County to purchase ten pollution-reducing vehicles. Without the waivers, MCAG would have been prevented from using federal dollars to make the purchases as the Federal Highway Administration’s Buy America requirement mandates that steel and iron used in government projects be manufactured domestically. TPA coordinated a coalition of Congressional members from the San Joaquin Valley including Representatives Costa, Nunes, Valadao, McClintock, Denham, and McCarthy, to issue a delegation letter to the Secretary of Transportation advocating for the waivers.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 8

FIRM BACKGROUND & QUALIFICATIONS

EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL STATE & FEDERAL EARMARKS
As the premier grant writing and advocacy firm for California municipalities, TPA has extensive experience in providing customized and effective grant writing services and has built a robust reputation by providing these services to more than 320 diverse cities throughout the state. With valuable state and federal agency relationships, an expansive understanding of countless funding programs in a wide range of policy areas, and the capacity to pursue any and all relevant opportunities, TPA has achieved over $3.2 billion in funding success on behalf of clients and has maintained a trusted client base by ensuring seamless and timely communication. The funding secured has been allocated toward projects that positively impact local communities, such as transportation infrastructure improvements, workforce development programs, regional public safety initiatives, and community beautification projects.

This table provides an overview of our funding achievements on behalf of our clients from state, federal, and local government agencies as well as private and nonprofit grant programs. These amounts represent grants secured through a competitive and/or legislative process and do NOT include any funds awarded to clients via formulas or related forms of funding entitlements.

STATE BUDGET EARMARKS
Year Total Number of Projects Total Amount Awarded
2023-2024 55 $73,910,000
2022-2023 42 $200,950,000
2021-2022 30 $377,715,020
2019-2020 15 $36,230,000
TOTAL STATE BUDGET EARMARKS SECURED: $688,805,020

FEDERAL EARMARKS
Year Total Number of Projects Total Amount Awarded
2024 52 $57,599,445
2023 34 $60,390,094
2022 30 $59,060,357
TOTAL FEDERAL EARMARKS SECURED: $177,049,896
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 9

UNDERSTANDING OF SCOPE OF SERVICES & APPROACH

PROJECT WORK PLAN AND APPROACH
TPA will utilize the following strategic and comprehensive approach to provide state and federal legislative advocacy services to the City. • Conduct Detailed Orientation: TPA will utilize a continuation of our comprehensive onboarding process that includes extensive meetings with various relevant members of City leadership and key City departments to help develop a strategic plan that is carefully tailored to satisfy the needs of the City and is designed for maximum success in the current political climate and funding environment. • Develop Legislative Strategy: Utilizing the information gathered during the onboarding process, TPA will coordinate with the City to develop an official legislative platform and strategy that represents the City’s priorities in Sacramento and Washington, DC. This blueprint will be shared with key stakeholders in the State Legislature and Governor’s Administration as well as Congress and the Biden Administration.
• Implement the Legislative Strategy: TPA will advocate for the City’s legislative agenda utilizing the following methods:
o Build and Strengthen Relevant Relationships: TPA has cultivated a network of valuable relationships that will be leveraged to promote the City’s legislative agenda. These relationships include key officials in Sacramento and Washington, DC:
o Leverage Relationships for Strategic Advocacy Plan: TPA will engage various techniques to leverage our network of key relationships on behalf of the City:
 Schedule meetings for the City to discuss relevant legislation  Prepare all briefing materials and talking points for the City  Brief legislative offices and stakeholders on the City’s legislative agenda  Follow-up on meetings to ensure commitments and deliverables are being met
o Coordinate Advocacy Trips: TPA will work with the City to coordinate advocacy trips to Sacramento and Washington, DC to meet with the City’s legislative delegation, as well as legislators that serve on committees relevant to the City’s agenda. Furthermore, whenever possible, TPA will also schedule site visits by legislators to the City.

For advocacy trips to Washington, DC, TPA will handle all details of the trip, including, but not limited to:
 Planning and scheduling of meetings
 Providing logistical support, including airport pickups, hotel pickups, travel to and from meetings
 Providing access to a private office within walking distance to the Hill and with immediate access to the Metro
 Coordinating all meal reservations, including scheduling with key members to attend
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 10

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
 Access to the National Democratic Club
 Access to the Capitol Hill Club (National Republican Club of Capitol Hill)  Organizing any additional activities of interest (White House tour, VIP Capitol Tour, Monument Tour, African American Museum tickets, etc.) o Track Legislation: TPA will identify, analyze, and monitor all bill introductions and amendments relevant to the City’s legislative platform and assess their potential impact on the City.
o Craft Testimony and Position Letters: TPA will prepare and submit written and verbal testimony regarding legislation relevant to the City. TPA will also draft and deliver position letters to legislators and key officials on specific bill language.
o Draft Bill Language: TPA will draft language and amendments for relevant legislation, as required to protect and promote the City’s agenda. o Engage in the Rule-Making Process: TPA will coordinate with the City to engage during the federal rule-making process to ensure the City’s legislative agenda is being promoted and protected in Washington, DC. Engagement activities will include crafting and publishing public comments and contacting legislators to convey either support or opposition to the proposed rule. o State Budget Funding Opportunities: To maximize state funding, TPA will work with the City to identify projects and other funding priorities that may be suitable for funding through the State Budget. TPA will coordinate with the City to develop supporting materials for the budget request. TPA will also work with members of the City’s state legislative delegation, along with the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees, to gain support for the inclusion of the City’s project in the final State Budget approved by the Legislature. o Federal Earmark Opportunities: To maximize federal funding, TPA will work with the City to identify projects and other funding priorities that may be suitable for funding through the Federal Earmark process. TPA will coordinate with the City to develop supporting materials for the earmark request. TPA will also work with members of the City’s federal legislative delegation to gain support for the inclusion of the City’s project.
o Identify Funding Opportunities: TPA will proactively identify potential funding opportunities and assess program requirements and guidelines to maximize state and federal funding success for the City.
• Provide Progress Reports: TPA will confer regularly with the City on our activities.

TPA will provide timely electronic reports on the status of all legislative activity, such as bill language, amendments, and committee analyses. In addition to written reports, TPA will be available to the City for conference calls, in-person briefings, and meetings.
• Prepare and File Lobbying Disclosure Reports: TPA will prepare and file, on behalf of the City, all applicable state and federal lobbying disclosure reports.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 11

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH

PROJECT TEAM
With a team of 19 state and federal legislative advocates and grant writers, TPA has the breadth and depth of experience AND the ability to deploy as many advocates as needed to maximize success for the City while minimizing the burden on City staff. TPA proposes a dedicated team of five people to perform professional legislative and lobbying services for the City.

Niccolo De Luca
Vice President
Professional Credentials: Registered State and Federal Lobbyist Relevant Experience: 28 Years of Legislative Advocacy & Public Policy Experience Role: Strategic Advisor; State Legislative Advocate
Cori Takkinen
Vice President
Professional Credentials: Registered State and Federal Lobbyist Relevant Experience: 15 Years of Legislative Advocacy & Public Policy Experience Role: Strategic Advisor; State Legislative Advocate
Elisa Arcidiacono
Senior Associate
Professional Credentials: Registered State and Federal Lobbyist Relevant Experience: 11 Years of Legislative Advocacy & Public Policy Experience Role: Lead State Legislative Advocate
Joseph Melo
Senior Associate
Professional Credentials: Registered Federal Lobbyist
Relevant Experience: 10 Years of Legislative Advocacy & Public Policy Experience Role: Lead Federal Legislative Advocate
Sammi Maciel
Senior Associate
Professional Credentials: Registered Federal Lobbyist
Relevant Experience: 8 Years of Legislative Advocacy & Public Policy Experience Role: Federal Legislative Advocate
The individuals who will be principally responsible for working with the City will be Vice President Niccolo De Luca and Senior Associates Elisa Arcidiacono and Joseph Melo.

This team will be directly supported by TPA’s 17 additional legislative and funding advocates to ensure the City is able to take advantage of all legislative and funding avenues and secure significant success in both Sacramento and Washington, DC.

TPA uses a strategic approach to state and federal legislative advocacy services that will be tailored to meet the specific needs of the City. To maximize success, TPA’s team of advocates and grant writers will utilize a collaborative approach and leverage an expansive collection of relationships in the state and federal governments, as well as a variety of policy expertise, including in transportation and infrastructure, water, education, parks and recreation, and local governance. Resumes for each member of the team can be found on the following pages.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 12

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Niccolo De Luca, Vice President: Niccolo brings 28 years of legislative and public policy experience to TPA. Niccolo worked with the Cities of Berkeley, Concord, Emeryville, Campbell, Pinole, and Fremont to pass multiple pieces of state legislation that granted these cities the ability to create and enhance local revenue measures. Niccolo has expertise in the policy sectors of local governance, parks and natural resources, housing and homelessness, public safety, cultural resources, and cannabis.

Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Vice President 2008–Present
Throughout his tenure at TPA, Niccolo has been responsible for dozens of legislative proposals that have been signed into law and has secured millions in competitive grant funds for local public agency clients. In addition to his public policy expertise, Niccolo has widespread bipartisan relationships with Members and staff of the State Legislature including the Senate and Assembly Budget Chairs and the Budget Committee staff, Governor Newsom's Administration, and numerous policy committee staff. Some of Niccolo’s accomplishments include:
• Niccolo worked with Freedom West Homes to sponsor SB 593, which gives the City and County of San Francisco’s redevelopment successor agency the authority to finance up to 5,842 affordable housing units using the successor agency’s property tax revenue. This is one of the few Redevelopment Agency (RDA) successor agency bills signed into law by Governor Newsom and one of the few RDA successor agency bills signed into law since 2015, almost 10 years ago. Niccolo helped create and lead the coalition in drafting language, organizing letters of support, securing witnesses to testify, and worked closely with legislative leadership and the Governor’s. Ultimately, the Governor signed the measure into law.
• Niccolo was a major part of the coalition to help pass the state’s first ever automated speed enforcement legislation. Niccolo worked with the City of Oakland along with five local governments on AB 645, which established a pilot program to give local transportation authorities in six cities the authority to install speed safety systems. To garner momentum for its success, Niccolo worked with Oakland City staff to highlight the need, provide data on the number of accidents and collisions, and to provide technical support to the author and her office. Throughout AB 645’s progress through the Legislature, Niccolo provided lead testimony in multiple policy committees in support, drafted coalition letters, worked with the Author’s office and committee leaders on various iterations of amendments, and orchestrated support and testimony to counteract the opposition’s efforts. • Niccolo worked with the City of Oakland to secure $280 million in an FY 2021–2022 State Budget earmark for critical maritime infrastructure. Niccolo coordinated directly with Senate Budget Chair Nancy Skinner, the Oakland Mayor, and appropriate Senate and Assembly Budget Committee staff to draft the language for inclusion into the State Budget.

Niccolo’s strategy, execution, and relationships led to one of the highest budget earmarks in State history and a massive significant financial win for the City and Port of Oakland. • Niccolo led the TPA efforts to secure $33.1 million in critically needed park funding for cities and nonprofits in the Bay Area, Central Valley, and Southern California. These efforts included working on the funding guidelines, drafting the applications, lobbying for the applications, and working hand in hand with the funding agency. Niccolo was the team lead and instrumental in the many victories of our clients spanning throughout California Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 13

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
• Niccolo spearheaded the movement to secure $15 million in an FY 2022–2023 State Budget earmark to the City of Berkeley for the Berkeley Marina and Pier. This year-long effort included creating a local, grassroots effort, strategizing with the Mayor and City Council, drafting letters of support and speaking points, help drafting a budget, working in partnership with Senate Budget Chair Nancy Skinner and Assembly Member Buffy Wicks, and other related efforts.
• Niccolo was a major part of the coalition to help pass the state’s first-ever medicinal cannabis regulatory framework legislation. Niccolo served as an instrumental member of the statewide coalition that supported the views of both local government and the industry.

Niccolo actively drafted language and advocated with legislators and staff to ensure statewide regulations would be in the best interest of cities. Due to these efforts, Niccolo has been recognized as a policy expert on cannabis policy and has testified before numerous legislative committees on issues related to its statewide implementation. • Niccolo worked with the Cities of Berkeley, Concord, Emeryville, and Fremont to pass multiple pieces of state legislation that granted these cities the ability to create and enhance local revenue measures. Niccolo led the advocacy efforts on behalf of these cities which included drafting and implementing and plan of action, working closely with the author's offices to draft the legislation, building coalitions, testifying in committees, meeting with impacted state agencies and the Governor’s Administration, and other efforts. Due to these efforts, Niccolo has been recognized as a policy expert on Transactions and Use Taxes (TUT) and TPA has been hired specifically to run these legislative efforts on behalf of local governments throughout the Bay Area. • Niccolo worked closely with the City of Oakland to secure four grants in the combined amount of $18.9 million from the Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) Hiring Program. Niccolo developed the applications and shepherded them through the grant process, including leveraging relationships with the US Department of Justice and COPS staff, which resulted in critical federal funding for the City to hire additional police officers.

City of Oakland
Deputy City Administrator 2004–2007
Niccolo managed daily operations for the public works and police departments, overseeing a combined $323 million budget and supervising 45 employees. He led the creation of a crime reduction initiative adopted by the City Council, resulting in reduced crime. Niccolo also expanded neighborhood public safety gatherings for three consecutive years, nearly doubling participation annually. Additionally, he served as the lead administrative staff for three City Council committees, providing policy expertise to the Mayor and Council.

City of Oakland
Assistant Director, Public Works Agency 2001–2004
Niccolo managed three public works divisions, overseeing finances, 40 staff members, and five direct reports. He implemented citywide procedures to reduce workers' compensation claims and served as the department's spokesperson, handling all media relations. Niccolo also acted as a hearing officer for union grievances, strengthening relationships with affected unions.

City of Oakland
Assistant to Councilmember Richard Spees 1998–2001
University of Oregon
Bachelor of Arts, American History 1997
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 14

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Cori Takkinen, Vice President: Cori brings 15 years of legislative advocacy and public policy experience to TPA. Cori has extensive experience writing grants for various local, regional, state, and federal opportunities. Cori has expertise in the policy sectors of local governance, transportation, water resources, infrastructure, sanitation, parks and recreation, and economic development.

Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Vice President 2011–Present
Throughout her tenure at TPA, Cori has been responsible for securing millions in competitive grant funds for local public agency clients. In addition to her expertise on municipal issues, Cori has strong experience building coalitions, identifying synergies, and leveraging all available opportunities to achieve success. Cori has a strong network of relationships with State Legislators, key staff, and various state agencies. Some of Cori’s accomplishments include:
• Leveraging relationships with the California Federal delegation, Cori had over $25 million in Community Project Funding (or earmarks) included in the nine appropriations bills that passed the House in FY 2022. In addition, Cori leveraged her relationships with Senator Padilla and Senator Feinstein to ensure the inclusion of several projects in the Senate Appropriations bills. Cori maintains a close relationship with Senator Padilla from his previous tenure in the State Senate as well as through his tenure on the Board of Directors of the Discovery Science Foundation, the founding client of Townsend Public Affairs. • Cori worked on behalf of several cities in North Orange County to secure $5 million in funding for the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative through the federal appropriations process in FY 2022. This was the largest community project award nationwide for the OBJ/Byrne JAG program at the federal level. • On behalf of the City of Newport Beach, Cori helped to successfully secure a state audit request of the State Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and their management of sober living homes. Cori worked with City and state legislative staff to help craft the state audit request of DHCS and advocated to members of the Joint Legislative Audit Committee (JLAC). The request was approved unanimously by the JLAC and has directed the State Auditor to conduct its investigation to provide a resolution for the City, as well as other cities across the State.
• In the FY 2021–22 State Budget, Cori worked with several municipal and nonprofit clients to secure $54 million in budget earmarks for priority projects, including funding for mental health, public safety, infrastructure improvements, and parks and trails improvements. • In the FY 2019–20 State Budget, Cori worked with five municipal clients and one nonprofit client to secure $20.2 million in budget earmarks for priority projects, including funding for a stormwater treatment facility, historical renovations, park and trail improvements, fire prevention, and children’s science education.
• Leveraging relationships with the State Legislature, Cori secured an earmark in the FY 2017–18 State Budget in the amount of $20 million to form the North Orange County Public Safety Collaborative. Since that time, Cori has identified additional funding opportunities at the state and federal level and the Collaborative has received a total of $40.8 million since 2017. These annual funds have been allocated to be used for programs to address youth violence prevention and intervention in K–12 schools, programs to Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 15

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
promote and enhance the successful reentry of offenders into the community, and programs to address homeless outreach and intervention efforts. • Cori worked on behalf of the City of La Habra to secure a direct funding allocation in the FY 2021–22 State Budget in the amount of $8.5 million to repair an underground culvert in La Habra that collapsed due to a period of heavy rainfall. • Cori worked with the City of Santa Ana to secure a direct funding allocation in the FY 2018–19 State Budget in the amount of $4 million to upgrade water infrastructure within the City. TPA worked with the City’s legislative delegation, staff from the Assembly and Senate Budget Committees, and the Department of Finance to ensure funding was included in the State Budget for this critical project to allow the City’s water customers to have real-time access to their water usage,.
• Cori worked with the Orange County Water District and the Orange County Sanitation District to sponsor AB 2022 (Gordon). The bill allowed for limited bottling of the highly treated and recycled GWRS water for educational purposes. The bill was the first legislation in the nation that allowed for the direct bottling of advanced treated recycled water. TPA secured bipartisan support for the legislation and it was signed into law. • Cori worked with the State Legislature and Administration on the development and implementation of Proposition 68, the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018. Cori worked in support of a variety of clients to create specific funding opportunities to achieve results. In addition to securing funding opportunities for municipalities, Cori’s efforts with Proposition 68 resulted in $4.8 million to fund a conservation program at West Coyote Hills in Fullerton as well as $3.5 million to fund science education at the Discovery Cube Orange County. • Cori has been engaged in State fire prevention legislation to reduce the risk of fires caused by above-ground utilities as well as to provide opportunities for local jurisdictions located in high fire hazard severity zones to receive priority for fire mitigation measures. • Cori worked with the City of Brea to secure over $10 million from local, state, and federal sources for the Tracks at Brea project. The project is a four-mile multi-use rail-to-trail project that will traverse the City. Funding sources include the US Environmental Protection Agency, California Natural Resources Agency, Strategic Growth Council, California Transportation Commission, and the Southern California Association of Governments.

County of Orange, Board of Supervisors
Policy Advisor for Supervisor John Moorlach 2010
Tom Campbell for US Senate Campaign 2010
Chapman University, Orange, CA
Master of Public Administration 2014
Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA
Bachelor of Arts Economics and Government with Leadership Sequence 2011 Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 16

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Elisa Arcidiacono, Senior Associate: Elisa brings 11 years of legislative, funding, and public policy experience and has extensive experience in legislative analysis, communications, and relationship building. Her six years of working in the California State Assembly resulted in strong working relationships with key decision-makers in the State Legislature and with relevant state agency officials. Elisa has expertise in several policy areas including local governance, public safety, technology, emergency management, and housing and homelessness.

Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Senior Associate 2024–Present
As a Senior Associate, Elisa is skilled at managing clients’ legislative agendas while leveraging robust policy knowledge and relationships at both the state and federal levels to ensure legislative and funding success. Some of Elisa’s experiences include:
• Elisa’s experience working in the California Legislature has led to an extensive network of relationships both in the State Legislature and within state agencies. These relationships have led to many successes in navigating program complexities, rules, and regulations at agencies such as the California Departments of Transportation, Housing and Community Development, Environmental Protection Agency, and Education. Her understanding of the regional and political dynamics of the California legislative delegation and their interactions with other members in the Legislature are key to successfully advocating for local communities and projects.

California State Assembly, Office of Assembly Member Tom Lackey (AD-34) Chief of Staff 2023–2024
As the Member’s Chief of Staff, Elisa led a team of ten staff members in the Capitol Office and two District Offices, as well as managed the Member’s communications, team budget, staff expansion, and District fundraising. Alongside local government stakeholders, Elisa helped lead relief and recovery efforts following local disasters and fostered strong relationships with regional aerospace partners to facilitate industry growth.

Elisa staffed AB 2645 (2024, Lackey) to increase information sharing between tolling agencies and law enforcement partners to improve efforts to find missing persons. This will improve public safety statewide and make law enforcement more efficient and responsive by leveraging existing available technology in specific cases involving special alerts.

League of California Cities
Legislative Affairs, Lobbyist 2021–2023
Elisa led advocacy efforts and communications with member cities, the California State Legislature, the Governor’s Administration, and the Board of Directors on several critical issues, especially public safety, cannabis legislation, and public safety. Elisa organized and facilitated numerous statewide roundtable discussions with cities throughout the state to discuss solutions to issues facing local police and fire agencies.

Elisa worked with the Oxnard Fire Department, the Fire Chiefs Association and the California Professional Firefighters to sponsor AB 662 (2022, Rodriguez) to establish peer-to-peer suicide prevention programming for firefighters and emergency medical personnel.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 17

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Elisa worked with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to educate California cities on local impacts following updated Fire Hazard Severity Zone mapping. This included efforts to increase local input and improve communication across agencies.

Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Justice Deputy to Supervisor Kathryn Barger 2018–2021
Elisa was the lead public safety policy advisor to the Supervisor, managing more than a dozen departments, and acted as the main point of contact for all emergency notifications in the Supervisor’s District. Elisa also maintained regular communication with all law enforcement and first responder agencies regarding community impacts, resources, and needs within the District.

Elisa worked amongst Supervisorial offices to reform the County Probation Department and reimagine the use of carceral facilities in the City of Lancaster. Elisa facilitated multiple focus groups with impacted community members and partnered with County agencies to increase public safety partnerships and oversight.

Elisa led efforts to backfill resources and ensure continuity of efforts for the LA County Sheriff’s Department’s Mental Evaluation Team and Homeless Outreach Services Team during years with significant budgetary restraints. These vital services improve interactions and connection to services with people experiencing homelessness or living with mental health conditions.

California State Assembly, Office of Assembly Member Tom Lackey (AD-36) Legislative Director, Legislative Assistant 2014–2018
Elisa staffed the Member on the Public Safety and Local Government Committees and made recommendations for all Floor votes. Elisa also trained and managed staff, led legislative research, and developed policies on behalf of the Member and local stakeholders. Additionally, she secured the allocation of $10 million to provide housing for youth experiencing homelessness and led quarterly community stakeholder roundtables to maintain open dialogues with priority groups in the District.

California State University, Channel Islands
Bachelor of Arts, Political Science 2013
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 18

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Joseph Melo, Senior Associate: Joseph brings 10 years of federal legislative, funding, and public policy experience. Joseph has extensive experience managing legislative and funding activity, including bill analysis, research, and drafting, particularly for federal funding opportunities. Joseph has expertise in several policy areas including energy and commerce, technology, education, housing, foreign affairs, and local government governance.

Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Senior Associate 2023–Present
As a Senior Associate, Joseph is skilled in leveraging his extensive policy knowledge and relationships at both the state and federal levels to advocate for TPA clients and ensure legislative and funding success. Some of Joseph’s experiences include:
• Through the FY 2024 federal appropriations process, Joseph secured over $3.9 million in community project funding working closely with both the Senate and House of Representatives. Joseph’s knowledge of the process led to the only federal earmark secured for a community college in the NASA appropriations bill. • Joseph helped identify a previously unfunded water recycling and reuse project worth up to $20 million authorized by Congress in 1996. Joseph is now working alongside the Bureau of Reclamation and the City of Tracy to implement the authorizing language and secure the funding.
• Joseph is currently advocating for the transfer of an Army Reserve Center site to the City of San Pablo. The armory is inactive, and the city sought to acquire the land to use as a new public works corporation yard. Joseph engaged the staff of Representative John Garamendi, the House Armed Services Committee, and the Department of Defense to pursue a public interest land conveyance legislated through the National Defense Authorization Act.
• Joseph successfully elevated the profile of California-based Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) public agencies in Washington, DC by leading the efforts to inform congressional and agency staff of the work performed by CCAs and ensure they are eligible for relevant funding opportunities. Through a joint CCA advocacy trip and correspondence delivered to five federal agencies, Joseph organized a coalition to advocate for the roles of CCAs in federal clean energy programs. • Joseph’s experience working for two California Congressional Representatives has led to an extensive network of relationships both on Capitol Hill and within federal agencies.

These relationships have led to many successes in navigating program complexities, rules, and regulations at agencies such as the Departments of Education, Energy, Commerce, the Treasury, and EPA. His understanding of the regional and political dynamics of the California Congressional delegation and their interactions with other members of the Senate and House are key to successfully advocating for California-based clients.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 19

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
• Joseph has extensive knowledge and understanding of the current federal appropriations process and has experience in successfully securing millions of dollars worth of earmarks for California projects. While serving as Policy Advisor to Congressman McNerney, Joseph assisted in securing $27 million in community project funding for 15 community projects in Contra Costa and San Joaquin counties, greatly benefiting local California communities.

U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Congressman Jerry McNerney (CA-09) Policy Advisor, Legislative Assistant, Legislative Correspondent, Intern 2019–2023 As Policy Advisor, Joseph led the Congressman’s legislative portfolio on issues under the jurisdiction of the Energy & Commerce Committee (Subcommittees on Energy, Communications & Technology, and Consumer Protection & Commerce) and the Science, Space & Technology Committee (Subcommittee on Energy). He assisted in staffing, advising, and preparing the Congressman’s questions and talking points for committee hearings and markups. Joseph co-led the Congressman’s appropriations process and initially helped to secure more than $27 million for fifteen community projects located in California’s Contra Costa County and San Joaquin County as well as managed the Congressman’s caucus work as co-chair of the Artificial Intelligence Caucus and Wi-Fi Caucus. Before serving as the Congressman’s Policy Advisor, Joseph served as Legislative Assistant, Legislative Correspondent/Staff Assistant, and Intern, demonstrating expertise in a wide range of policy areas, including energy and commerce, technology, education, housing, foreign affairs, and local governance.

Save the Children Action Network
Public Policy and Advocacy Intern 2018
Joseph supported bipartisan federal, state, and local government relations efforts through research on elected officials, congressional candidates, and legislation. He also wrote a memorandum on education programs and policies, and he drafted policy documents advocating for specific legislation and institutions relating to early childhood education.

Oracle Corporation
Enterprise Account Manager 2015–2017
While at Oracle, Joseph progressed from Business Development Consultant to Account Manager in under two years. As Enterprise Account Manager, Joseph supported Fortune 100 companies and associated subsidiaries in initiating, developing, and closing sales cycles with Oracle’s cloud portfolio as well as led meetings and managed relationships with executive leadership.

U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (CA-12) District Intern 2014
Joseph assisted in casework and advocated for constituents by calling, emailing, and helping draft letters to federal agencies. Additionally, he worked alongside congressional aides to research and complete policy-focused projects.

University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Arts, Political Science 2015
The Wilson Center
Foreign Policy Fellowship Program Certificate 2022
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 20

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
Sammi Maciel, Senior Associate: Sammi brings eight years of federal legislative, funding, and public policy experience. Sammi has experience managing legislative activity, including bill analysis, research, and drafting, particularly for federal funding opportunities. Sammi has expertise in several policy sectors including local governance, transportation, broadband, energy, and cultural resources.

Townsend Public Affairs, Inc.

Senior Associate 2021–Present
Since joining TPA, Sammi has kept clients informed of significant actions and pertinent developments in the federal government and strategizes ways in which to influence and enact changes in Washington, DC that have concrete results for clients. Some of Sammi’s experiences include:
• Sammi led TPA’s Community Project Funding efforts for the past three years, during which the firm secured more than $177 million in federal funding for 116 projects. • Sammi has strong relationships with key officials within the Department of Transportation, Energy, and Environmental Protection Agency, which have been critical in helping to advocate and navigate the hundreds of new funding opportunities implemented through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act. Sammi has leveraged these relationships to guide clients in the submittal process for the millions of dollars available to improve our client’s infrastructure priorities.
• Sammi has leveraged her relationships with regional and national EDA officials to assist in drafting applications for the newly Authorized Recompetes program, made available through the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act.
• In FY 2023, Sammi worked with the City of Half Moon Bay to secure a $2 million earmark for the City’s Highway 1–Frenchman Creek Intersection and Bike/Pedestrian Improvement project. Sammi assisted in developing and submitting the project for consideration and leveraged her extensive federal relationships to ensure success. • Sammi’s four years of experience working for two California Senators has led to an extensive network of relationships both on Capitol Hill and within federal agencies. Her understanding of the regional and political dynamics of the California Congressional delegation and their interactions with other members of the Senate and House are important to successfully advocating for California-based clients. • Sammi has first-hand knowledge of the current federal appropriations process, including community project funding requests. This process differs from the pre-2011 earmark process and an understanding of the need to balance transparency and politics to submit a competitive request is key. Sammi has utilized her experience to successfully aid clients in securing millions of dollars’ worth of earmarks in the FY22 and FY23 process. • Sammi has identified new and previously underutilized federal grants for the benefit of TPA clients. She has leveraged her relationships with key grant officials at various federal Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 21

UNDERSTANDING & APPROACH
agencies to ascertain their specific priorities and buzzwords required for successful grant applications. Sammi then leverages that information to help TPA clients develop and submit more competitive federal grant applications and provides more effective tailored advocacy to secure funding awards.

U.S. Senate, Office of Senator Kamala Harris (CA)
Field Representative 2019–2021
Sammi represented a 30-county region on behalf of Senator Harris, attending events, hosting meetings, and facilitating outreach to constituents. She tracked key issues, facilitated rapid response, and built an extensive network of relationships with local elected officials and advocacy groups within her 30-county region. Additionally, Sammi drafted letters of support on behalf of her region addressed to numerous federal agencies, requesting funding for key projects.

U.S. Senate, Office of Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA)
Legislative Intern Summer of 2017
As a legislative intern with Senator Dianne Feinstein’s office, Sammi researched and drafted memos for state field representatives regarding state legislature bills in the policy areas of transportation and water infrastructure, cannabis, and sanctuary cities.

Dominican University of California
Bachelor of Arts, Political Science 2017

INVOLVEMENT OF CITY STAFF
TPA state and federal advocates diligently work to build and leverage relevant relationships, coordinate with stakeholders, monitor and analyze legislation, implement quality control measures, and maintain consistent communications to identify and pursue all legislative opportunities relevant to the City’s interests. TPA will rely on City staff for specific timely engagement on legislative issues throughout the state and federal legislature processes, as well as to provide applicable technical project information for legislative-directed spending opportunities. However, TPA will work to reduce the burden on City staff while implementing its state and federal legislative agendas. This approach enables the TPA team to be an extension of City staff, ensuring that both TPA and the City continue to work together seamlessly to secure legislative successes in the current political and funding environments in Sacramento and Washington, DC.

TPA’s team of 19 state and federal legislative advocates has the capacity to work collaboratively and diligently to pursue multiple opportunities on behalf of the City at any given time. As a firm comprised of both legislative advocates and grant writers, our uniquely comprehensive approach to advocacy ensures that no opportunity is missed, and the City is aware of any and all legislative and funding activity occurring at the state and federal levels. Through consistent communication and proactive engagement, TPA’s team of advocates will be able to quickly respond to legislation, coordinate with City staff, and implement the appropriate advocacy strategies within the timeframes of the City, state, and federal governments.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 22

REFERENCES

1. CITY OF COMPTON
Contact Name: Emma Sharif
Contact Title: Mayor
Address: 205 South Willowbrook Ave, Compton, CA 90220
Phone Number: 310-722-3203
Email Address: [email protected]
Start & End Date: July 2022 – Present
Project Description: TPA provides state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing services to the City.

2. CITY OF SAN PABLO
Contact Name: Matt Rodriguez
Contact Title: City Manager
Address: 1000 Gateway Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806
Phone Number: 510-215-3016
Email Address: [email protected]
Start & End Date: November 2010 – Present
Project Description: TPA provides state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing services to the City.

3. CITY OF HESPERIA
Contact Name: Rachel Molina
Contact Title: City Manager
Address: 15776 Main Street, Hesperia, CA 92345
Phone Number: 760-947-1018
Email Address: [email protected]
Start & End Date: October 2013 – Present
Project Description: TPA provides state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing services to the City.

4. CITY OF EL MONTE
Contact Name: Alma Martinez
Contact Title: City Manager
Address: 11333 Valley Boulevard, El Monte, CA 91731
Phone Number: 626-580-2089
Email Address: [email protected]
Start & End Date: January 2015 – Present
Project Description: TPA provides state and federal legislative advocacy and grant writing services to the City.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 23

REFERENCES

5. SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Contact Name: Ricky Choi
Contact Title: Director of Government and Community Relations Address: 1333 Mayflower Avenue, Suite 360, Monrovia, CA 91016 Phone Number: 626-319-5050
Email Address: [email protected]
Start & End Date: October 2023 – Present
Project Description: TPA provides state and federal legislative advocacy services to SGVCOG.

CURRENT CLIENTS
TPA currently provides state and/or federal legislative advocacy and/or grant writing services to the following public agencies:
• City of Agoura Hills
• City of Alhambra
• City of Anaheim
• City of Atascadero
• City of Atwater
• City of Avalon
• City of Berkeley
• City of Brawley
• City of Brea
• City of Buena Park
• City of Campbell
• City of Chino Hills
• City of Citrus Heights
• City of Compton
• City of Concord
• City of Costa Mesa
• City of Del Mar
• City of Dinuba
• City of Dublin
• City of El Monte
• City of Emeryville
• City of Farmersville
• City of Fontana
• City of Fort Bragg
• City of Fountain
Valley
• City of Fremont
• City of Fullerton
• City of Gardena
• City of Guadalupe
• City of Half Moon
Bay
• City of Hanford
• City of Hayward
• City of Hesperia
• City of Huron
• City of Irvine
• City of Kingsburg
• City of La Habra
• City of La Palma
• City of La Verne
• City of Lafayette
• City of Laguna
Beach
• City of Los Alamitos
• City of Los Banos
• City of Madera
• City of Malibu
• City of Manteca
• City of Mendota
• City of Menifee
• City of Millbrae
• City of Mission Viejo
• City of Modesto
• City of Monterey
Park
• City of Moreno
Valley
• City of Morro Bay
• City of Murrieta
• City of Newport
Beach
• City of Oakland
• City of Oakley
• City of Oceanside
• City of Ontario
• City of Orange
• City of Orange Cove
• City of Pacifica
• City of Orinda
• City of Palm Desert
• City of Palm Springs
• City of Palmdale
• City of Palo Alto
• City of Parlier
• City of Paso Robles
• City of Pico Rivera
• City of Pinole
• City of Pismo Beach
• City of Placentia
• City of Placerville
• City of Pleasanton
• City of Reedley
• City of Rialto
• City of San Leandro
• City of San Pablo
• City of Santa Ana
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 24

REFERENCES
• City of Santa
Barbara
• City of Santa Clara
• City of Shafter
• City of Sierra Madre
• City of Soledad
• City of South El
Monte
• City of South San
Francisco
• City of Stanton
• City of Temecula
• City of Tracy
• City of Tulare
• City of Turlock
• City of Tustin
• City of Union City
• City of Walnut Creek
• City of West
Sacramento
• City of Westminster
• City of Wheatland
• County of Kern
• County of Imperial
• County of Mariposa
• County of Orange
• County of Shasta
• County of Stanislaus
• Merced County
Association of
Governments
• San Gabriel Valley
Council of
Governments
• Tri-Valley Cities
Coalition
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 25

DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
TPA does not have any potential or current conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this RFP or work with the City.

Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 26

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
FIRM’S STRENGTHS AND RELATIONSHIPS
TPA is uniquely positioned to deliver comprehensive state and federal advocacy services to the City of Lawndale. Our integrated approach as both state and federal lobbyists enables us to advocate on issues of importance in Sacramento and Washington, DC, ensuring that legislative opportunities, competitive funding, and policy trends are tracked and leveraged from development to implementation. By working with TPA, the City will gain a partner with deep-rooted relationships in Sacramento and Washington, D.C., and a team that consistently delivers strategic guidance, timely action, and tailored solutions aligned with the City’s goals.

Unlike other firms, TPA seamlessly integrates both state and federal services under one roof, providing our clients with a strategic advantage. This unique structure allows us to track the progression of federal policies and funding opportunities from their inception, ensuring that when these funds and programs reach California, Lawndale will be wellpositioned to respond and benefit. This comprehensive approach means we can follow the entire lifecycle of legislative initiatives and funding streams, maximizing advocacy and grant outcomes and solidifying the City’s voice and visibility on key policy issues at every governmental level.

As a proud partner of the League of California Cities and other key statewide associations, TPA is committed to leveraging our longstanding relationships with these organizations to amplify the City’s interests. TPA maintains active involvement in Cal Cities, staying apprised of their policy goals and participating in events that provide valuable opportunities for networking, advocacy, and collaboration. By leveraging these partnerships, we can provide the City with critical insights into legislative developments, emerging issues, and funding opportunities, while ensuring that the City maintains a strong and unique voice in Sacramento and Washington, DC. TPA also has strong relationships with the following legislators, representatives, agencies, and departments that will ensure the City’s priorities are being heard by top decision-makers.

City’s State Legislative Delegation:
• Senator Steven Bradford
• Assembly Member Tina McKinnor
Governor’s Administration and Agency Leadership:
• Governor Gavin Newsom
 Chief of Staff Dana Williamson
• Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis
• State Treasurer Fiona Ma
• State Controller Malia Cohen
• Attorney General Rob Bonta
• Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond
• Secretary Wade Crowfoot, Natural Resources Agency
• Secretary Toks Omishakin, California State Transportation Agency Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 27

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• Secretary Amelia Yana Garcia Gonzalez, California Environmental Protection Agency
• Secretary Tomiquia Moss, Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency • Director Armando Quintero, Department of Parks and Recreation • Director Karla Nemeth, Department of Water Resources
• Director Joe Stephenshaw, Department of Finance
• Director Gustavo Velasquez, Department of Housing and Community Development
State Legislative Leadership:
• Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire
• Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez
• Senate Republican Leader Brian Jones
• Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas
• Assembly Speaker Pro Tempore Jim Wood
• Assembly Majority Leader Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
• Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher
Key Legislative Committee Leadership
• Senate Appropriations Chair Anna Caballero
• Senate Budget Chair Scott Wiener
• Senate Human Services Committee Chair Marie Alvarado-Gill • Senate Transportation Committee Chair Dave Cortese
• Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee Chair Dave Min • Senate Public Safety Committee Chair Aisha Wahab
• Assembly Transportation Committee Chair Lori Wilson
• Assembly Appropriations Chair Buffy Wicks
• Assembly Budget Chair Jesse Gabriel
• Assembly Local Government Committee Chair Juan Carrillo • Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee Chair Chris Ward • Assembly Water, Parks, and Wildlife Committee Chair Diane Papan City’s Federal Legislative Delegation:
• Senator Alex Padilla
• Senator Laphonza Butler
• Representative Maxine Waters
President’s Administration and Federal Agencies:
• White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs
• Stephanie Sykes, Special Assistant to the President
• Department of Agriculture
• Homer Wilkes, Under Secretary of Natural Resources and Environment • Carlos Suarez, California State Conservationist
• Department of Commerce
• Michell Morton, Broadband Program Specialist
Proposal for Professional Legislative & Lobbying Services | City of Lawndale Page 28

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• Department of Education
• Adam Honeysett, Managing Director, State and Local Engagement • Department of Homeland Security
• Department of Energy
• Rose Dady, Director of Community Engagement
• Department of Housing and Urban Development
• Patrick Byrne, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Intergovernmental Relations • Chi Chukwuka, Senior Advisor
• Department of the Interior
• Department of Justice
• Shannon Long, COPS Office
• Department of Labor
• Department of Transportation
• Evan Wessel, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intergovernmental Affairs • Army Corps of Engineers
• Mark Cohen, Operations Division Chief, Los Angeles District • Lisa Sandoval, Civil Works Branch Chief, Real Estate Division • Darrell Buxton, Chief Civil Works Branch, Los Angeles District • Bureau of Reclamation
• Jack Simes, Area Manager, Southern California Area Office • Federal Aviation Administration
• Faviola Garcia, Deputy Regional Administrator
• Nathan Morrissey, FAASTeam Ops
• Economic Development Administration
• Environmental Protection Agency
• Martha Guzman, EPA Region 9 Administrator
• Jamie Piziali, Municipal Ombudsman
• Fish and Wildlife Service
• National Marine Fisheries Service
• National Park Service
Key Congressional Legislative Committees:
• Senate Appropriations Committee
• Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee • Senate Environment and Public Works Committee
• House Appropriations Committee
• House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney
Hrant Manuelian, Finance Director/City Treasurer
SUBJECT:

Purchasing Policy Reorganization and Amendment to Authorize City Manager Purchases in Specified Situations

BACKGROUND
Over the past year, the City Manager brought two items to the City Council for review and ratification. The first involved repairs to a security gate at a City Hall parking lot. The second involved repairs to City vehicles. Both situations involved contracts that were properly let according to the Municipal Code but which, once work was in process, wound up exceeding the contracting threshold. Technically speaking, each situation should have seen work come to a stop and then a higher level of contract procurement take place before work was completed. But in the context of the first situation it would have meant the security gate sat inoperable and blocking the driveway during procurement. And in the second situation it would have meant the vehicles sitting in one repair shop while bids from other repair shops were sought. In neither circumstance were the additional factors requiring a higher price known or knowable before work began and the equipment being serviced was taken apart.

In both circumstances, the City Manager relied on his inherent authority under Sections 3.08.040 and

3.08.050 of the Municipal Code to have work completed. He then brought the completed work to the attention of the City Council as an agenda item at a Council meeting for the sake of transparency and good government.

The initial changes to the City’s purchasing policy would clarify the situations, like the two recent ones, in which the City Manager has express authority from the Council to move forward with ongoing contracts instead of stopping and going to a higher level of procurement processes. These were called “exigent” circumstances and are found in new Section 5.b of the policy. The second changes, requested by the City Council when this matter was first brought forward, would define “emergency” circumstances; these are found in new Section 5.a. and include: a situation in which a State of Emergency has been formally declared by the Federal, State, County, or City government in accordance with the statutes or ordinances giving it the power to do so. It shall also mean a situation in which due to weather conditions, natural disaster, civil unrest, or other circumstances affecting the City there is an immediate need to obtain goods and/or services to prevent harm to City facilities or personnel (or the public) and the immediate need makes infeasible or impossible full compliance with the Purchasing Ordinance.

The remaining changes to the policy were requested by City staff as a way to streamline and shorten the policy while retaining the substance of it. Items had been added over the years that could be combined for ease of use. This was done as part of the revision process.

STAFF REVIEW
The City Council is asked to review the redline and final versions of the revised purchasing policy and then adopt the changes. The changes will simplify portions of the policy while also granting the City Manager clear authority to act in situations of emergency and situations in which contractor estimates are exceeded by the actual cost of work being performed.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has prepared the proposed changes and approved them as consistent with the purchasing ordinance in the Municipal Code.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as a result of this item.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council review the proposed changes and adopt Resolution No. CC-2409- 095 making the changes to the purchasing policy.

Attachments
53-00 Purchasing Policy Lawndale 2021 redline with emergency change 4936-4276-8399 v.pdf CC-2409-095 Updating Purchasing Policy No. 53-00.pdf

ATTACHMENT A
Council Policy No. 53-00

Page 1 ends

Lawndale City CouncilFebruary 3, 2025

Lawndale City Council
February 3, 2025