Agenda packet — Lawndale City Council, December 15, 2025

CITY OF LAWNDALE

AGENDA OF THE LAWNDALE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Monday, December 15, 2025, 6:30 PM
Council Chambers
14717 Burin Ave
Lawndale, CA 90260
Any person who wishes to address the City Council regarding any item listed on this agenda or any other matter that is within its subject matter jurisdiction is invited, but not required, to fill out a Public Meeting Speaker Card and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the oral communications portion of the meeting. The purpose of the card is to ensure that the speaker’s name is correctly recorded in the meeting minutes and, where appropriate, to provide contact information for staff follow-up.

How to observe the Meeting:

To maximize public safety while maintaining transparency and public access, members of the public may now attend the meeting in person. The meeting will also continue to be available for viewing on YouTube “Lawndale CityTV”, the City TV Website, and Lawndale Community Cable Television on Spectrum and Frontier Channel 3.

Copies of this agenda are available prior to the meeting in the Lawndale City Hall foyer or on the City website. Interested parties may contact the City Clerk’s Department at (310) 973-3213 for clarification regarding any individual agenda item.”
This Agenda is subject to revision up to 72 hours before the meeting.

A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
B. CEREMONIALS (Flag Salute and Inspiration)
C. PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT

1. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update
D. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA (Public Comments) E. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL
F. CONSENT CALENDAR
Items 2 through 6 will be considered and acted upon under one motion unless a City Councilmember removes individual items for further City Council consideration or explanation.

2. Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda — Recommendation: that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

3. Accounts Payable Register
— Recommendation: Staff recommends that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2512-057 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $1,168,006.19

4. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting - December 1, 2025 — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes.

5. Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Special Meeting December 3, 2025 — Recommendation: that the City Council approve the minutes.

6. City Manager Agreement and Release
— Recommendation: that the City Council receive and file the attached Separation Agreement and General Release.

G. PUBLIC HEARING

7. Approval of CDBG Projects
— Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Conduct a public hearing; 2.) Adopt the FY 2026-27 budget for the CDBG program; and 3.) Adopt Resolution No. CC-2512-058, approving the City’s participation in the FY 2026- 27 CDBG Program.

H. ADMINISTRATION

8. Annual Reorganization of the City Council
— Recommendation: that the City Council appoint one of its members to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for a term beginning on January 1, 2026, and ending on December 31, 2026.

9. Adoption of a City Policy Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures — Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Adopt Resolution No. CC-2512-060 establishing a City policy authorizing the use of an electronic signature in lieu of a written signature on a document in which a signature is required; or 2.) Provide staff with alternate direction.

10. Appointment to Vacancy on the SBWIB Lawndale Business Private Sector Seat — Recommendation: that the City Council 1.) Re-affirm the SBWIB's nomination for appointment of Mr. Carlos Ferreira, owner of King of Wings, as the City of Lawndale representative on the SBWIB Business Private Sector seat, to fill the current vacant seat until expiration on June 30, 2026, and a new four (4) year term beginning July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2030; or 2.) Provide further direction to staff.

11. Discussion of E-Bike Urgency Ordinance
— Recommendation: that the City Council review recently adopted e-bike regulations that other cities have enacted and give direction to City Staff to pursue one of the following three options: Option 1) Pursue an urgency ordinance, as E-bikes constitute an immediate danger and threat to public safety; Option 2) Pursue a regular ordinance, as E-bikes have the potential to be a greater threat to public safety than previously thought; or Option 3) Leave existing ordinances regarding E-bikes as they are, including maintaining current enforcement levels.

12. South Bay Regional Housing Trust by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments Board of Directors — Recommendation: that the City Council 1) Discuss SBCCOG's request and receive their presentation; or 2) Approve joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), which would help fund the development and construction of affordable housing in the South Bay; or 3) Provide further direction to staff.

13. Recommendation to Continue to Use Everbridge as the Citywide Emergency Notification System — Recommendation: that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Renewal Quote for One-Year between the City of Lawndale and Everbridge.

14. Notice of Completion for FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project — Recommendation: that the City Council 1) Accept the project completion by Sequel Contractors, Inc., for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project; 2) Authorize staff to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder County Clerk’s Office for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk replacement Project; and 3) Authorize staff to release the retention in the amount of $104,265.84 for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project.

I. CITY MANAGER REPORT
J. ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCILMEMBERS

15. Report of Attendance at Meetings
K. CLOSED SESSION

16. Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation — The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with legal counsel regarding a significant exposure to litigation, the facts and circumstances of which are not known to the potential plaintiff: one (1) case.

17. Public Employee Appointment
The City Council will conduct a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b), regarding the appointment of an Interim City Manager.

18. Public Employee Appointment
The City Council will conduct a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b), regarding the appointment of a City Manager.

L. ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council will be held at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, January 5, 2026, in the Lawndale City Hall Council Chamber, 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale, California.

It is the intention of the City of Lawndale to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, you need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, we will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the City Clerk Department (310) 973-3213 prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Please advise us at that time if you will need accommodation to attend or participate in meetings on a regular basis.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council to be held on Monday, December 15, 2025, was posted no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting. /s/ Yvette Palomo
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Date Posted: December 11, 2025

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Update No supporting documentation was forwarded to the City Clerk Department for this item.

Motion to read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the Agenda

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council read by title only and waive further reading of all ordinances listed on the agenda.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Hrant Manuelian, Finance Director/City Treasurer SUBJECT: Accounts Payable Register

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council adopts Resolution No. CC-2512-057 authorizing the payment of certain claims and demands in the amount of $1,168,006.19.

Attachments
A. CC-2512-057 - AP Resolution - Dec. 15, 2025.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Regular Meeting - December 1, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the minutes.

Attachments
Draft Minutes 12-01-25.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Minutes of the Lawndale City Council Special Meeting December 3, 2025

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the minutes.

Attachments
Draft 12-3-25 Spec Meeting Minutes

ATTACHMENT A

Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney
Raylette Felton, Deputy City Manager/Director of Human Resources SUBJECT: City Manager Agreement and Release

BACKGROUND
On November 6, 2025, City Manager Sean Moore announced to the City Council that he would be leaving to take another position. This is considered a voluntary resignation from City employment under Mr. Moore’s employment agreement, which otherwise would run until February 21, 2028. The City Council accepted Mr. Moore’s resignation and as provided by the employment agreement determined that the 45-day notice period for departure would mean Mr. Moore’s last day with the City of Lawndale is on December 22, 2025.

STAFF REVIEW
On December 1, 2025, the City Council gave direction to the City Attorney and Mayor, in closed session, to negotiate and execute a separation agreement with Moore on certain defined terms. The terms were kept confidential, but the direction was publicly reported after the closed session ended. It is not uncommon for high-ranking executives separating from a municipality to do so through a separation agreement.

The attached fully executed and enforceable agreement is being presented for City Council to receive and file and for public review. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Moore receives a specified amount of compensation in exchange for a waiver of claims against the City. This resolution shows good faith by both parties and a desire that the relationship be ended in a positive and mutually acceptable manner.

LEGAL REVIEW
N/A

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to receiving and filing this agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Moore will receive the amount of $70,000.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council receive and file the attached Separation Agreement and General Release.

Attachments
Attachment A - Separation Agreement and General Release.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

Peter Kann, Community Development Director
Jose Hernandez, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Approval of CDBG Projects

BACKGROUND
The 1974 Housing and Urban Development Act established the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program in order to allocate Federal funds for State and local use. The use of these funds is restricted to programs that assist low and moderate-income persons. A secondary objective is to prevent and eliminate slum and blight conditions within a community.

The City of Lawndale is a participant in the Los Angeles Urban County CDBG program, and receives an annual allocation of CDBG funds from the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA). The current estimate for the new CDBG allocation for FY 2026-2027 is $226,724. This estimate is based on current CDBG funding levels and is consistent with the amount of funding the City has received over the last several years. This proposed CDBG allocation is a planning estimate only; LACDA will release final appropriations in spring 2026. The City's final CDBG allocation is generally within five to ten percent (5%-10%) of the estimate provided.

There are a number of other requirements for CDBG programs. CDBG funds may only be spent in those areas of the City determined to be block grant eligible (See Attachment C). The public must be given the opportunity to comment on the proposed budget (See Attachment B, Public Hearing Notice). Notices of a public hearing were posted at City Hall on December 1, 2025 and published in the Daily Breeze, pursuant to the applicable public noticing requirements.

Lastly, the maximum amount of CDBG monies that the City may devote to public service projects is 15% of its new year allocation (approximately $34,008) and no single public service activity may be funded for less than $10,000.

The recommended CDBG expenditures for FY 2026-27 are consistent with the requirements listed above.

The City’s FY 2026-27 proposed program of projects and funding levels must be submitted to the LACDA no later than February 1, 2026. The project has been submitted to LACDA before the deadline.

STAFF REVIEW
As described previously, each year the LACDA provides a planning estimate of new CDBG funds that will be made available to the City. The proposed budget retains existing programs and provides sufficient funding for critical projects. The proposed funding strategy is as follows:

Senior Activities Program: The amount to be allocated for senior activities will be the maximum percentage (15%) allowed for public service programs. An estimated $34,008 will be used to continue the existing Senior Activities Nutrition Program.

Street Resurfacing Projects: The proposed resurfacing projects include the following streets:

Street Name:

From: To: PCI: Estimated:

Eastwood Avenue
154th Street
Cul-de-Sac ~56 $
Total $ 226,724
These projects will consist of street improvements, including cold mill variable depth of existing asphalt pavement, installation of new asphalt - asphalt rubber hot mix (ARHM), saw cutting and removal and reconstruction of PCC curb & gutters, reconstruction of curb ramps, reconstruction of driveway approaches, reconstruction of sidewalk, adjusting utility covers to grade, and pavement striping. Any allocated CDBG funds not utilized (contingency funds) are rolled over to the following fiscal year and applied toward roadway projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed funding allocations is not considered to be a project under CEQA. The item is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review process because the proposed item is not a project. Under CEQA a “project” an activity that is a discretionary action by a governmental agency and will either have a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect impact on the environment. Therefore, CEQA does not apply.

COMMISSION REVIEW
Planning Commission review for this project is not required.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed Resolution No CC-2512-058 and approved it as to form.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is for the FY 2026-27 budget year and will be incorporated into the City’s budget as that budget is prepared. Additionally, CDBG funds awarded to the City will offset direct fiscal impacts to the City’s General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing;

2. Adopt the FY 2026-27 budget for the CDBG program; and

3. Adopt Resolution No. CC-2512-058, approving the City’s participation in the FY 2026-27 CDBG Program.

Attachments
Attachment A - RESO CC-2512-058 _ CDBG FY 26-27.pdf
Attachment B _ Public Notice.pdf
Attachment C _ CDBG Map.pdf
RESOLUTION NO. CC-2512-058

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING THE CITY’S COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
WHEREAS, on August 22, 1974, the President of the United States signed into law the Housing and Community Act of 1974 (Act); and
WHEREAS, the primary goals of Title I of the Act are the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate-income; and WHEREAS, for the past 50 years the City of Lawndale (City) has participated in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program which was established under the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a planning estimate that $226,724 in CDBG funds will be available to the City for the 2026-2027 Fiscal Year; and WHEREAS, the City has posted information regarding the Community Development Block Grant Program as required by law and, after notice duly given as required by law, held a public hearing on December 15, 2025 to consider approving the City’s proposed Community Development Block Grant Program for fiscal year 2026-2027, and evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, from all persons protesting the same and from members of the City staff, and the City Council has reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The CDBG projects, FY 2026-2027 funding allocations, as listed in the CDBG Funding Chart for FY 2026-2027 as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein are hereby approved as the City’s CDBG Program for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

SECTION 2. That the Mayor and/or City Manager are authorized and directed to submit the City’s proposed 2026-2027 planning documents to the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) setting forth the City’s proposed projects and funding allocations. Should minor adjustments to the allocations vary from the figures contained herein and/or any amounts remaining unspent at the close of the preceding fiscal year, the City Manager is authorized to adjust funding to the approved eligible activities as necessary.

SECTION 3. That the Mayor and/or City Manager are authorized to execute all necessary contracts and agreements with the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) and with each approved recipient/subrecipient of the CDBG program, together with any changes therein which may be approved by the City Manager.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of December 2025 ______________________________
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:

State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) SS
City of Lawndale )
I, Erika Harbison, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, California, do hereby certify that the City Council duly introduced the foregoing Resolution No. CC-2512-058 at its regular meeting held on the 15th day of December, 2025, and duly approved and adopted said resolution at its regular meeting held on the 15th day of December, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

Name Voting Present, Not Voting Absent
Aye No Abstain Not Participating
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
Pat Kearney, Mayor Pro Tem
Bernadette Suarez
Sirley Cuevas
Francisco M. Talavera
_________________________________
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
CDBG FUNDING CHART FOR FY 2026-2027
Project Title
Allocated
CDBG
Funds
Unallocated
CDBG
Funds(Prior
Year) and
Leveraged
Funds Total
Senior Activities (Max. 15%) $ 34,008 N/A
$
34,008
Nutrition
Street Projects
*CBDG FY 25/26 Highlighted in Gray $ 192,716 $ N/A

$192,716
Street
Name: From: To: PCI: Estimated:

Eastwood
Avenue
154th
Street Cul de sac ~56 $
Total $226,724
TOTAL $226,724
$
N/A

$226,724

ATTACHMENT
B

PUBLIC NOTICE

CITY OF LAWNDALE
City Council Meeting
Notice is hereby given that at 6:30
p.m. on Monday, December 15,
2025, the Lawndale City Council
will hold a public hearing in the
City Council Chambers located
at 14717 Burin Avenue, Lawndale,
CA to review the following
proposal:

PROJECT SELECTION FOR
THE 2026-2027 COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) PROGRAM YEAR.

The City of Lawndale is soliciting
public input to consider the
expenditure of funds to be
received as a result of the
1974 Housing and Community
Development Act. The public is
encouraged to attend and suggest
needs and priorities for possible
funding during the 2026-2027
(51st) program year beginning
July 1, 2025. Initial estimates are
that Lawndale will be allocated
approximately $226,724 for
this Program Year. These are
restricted funds to be used to
assist low and moderate income
persons, or to remove slum and
blight conditions. A maximum
of 15% of the annual allocation
may be used for public service
projects. A draft program will
be presented for the City Council
to consider. Current programs
include: Senior Activities and
Street Improvements.

Those wishing to comment on this
item may do so in person at the
public hearing, or by submitting
written comments to pkann@
Lawndale.ca.gov by 5:30 p.m.,
December 15, 2025. You may
contact Peter Kann, Community
Development Director, for
further information regarding
this matter at (310) 973-3231.

Daily Breeze
Published: 12/5/25

ATTACHMENT C

Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Annual Reorganization of the City Council

BACKGROUND
Since 1982, Lawndale has had a Mayor who is directly elected by the voters and a Mayor Pro Tem who is selected by the City Council. It is the City Council's policy that the office of Mayor Pro Tem be rotated to such an extent as possible among the members of the City Council and that the Mayor Pro Tem shall serve a term of one year or until a successor is appointed. (LMC Sec. 2.04.080).

On December 16, 2024, the City Council nominated and approved Councilmember Pat Kearney as Mayor Pro Tem for a one-year term to begin on January 1, 2025, and set to expire on December 31, 2025.

STAFF REVIEW
As stated above, it is the City Council's policy to appoint members in rotation. Therefore, the City Council should be mindful of the recent history of office holders, which is as follows:
2021 Pat Kearney
2022 Rhonda Hofmann Gorman
2023 Sirley Cuevas
2024 Bernadette Suarez
2025 Pat Kearney
It is also notable that the City Council Meeting Procedures specify the seating arrangement on the dais, with each Councilmember’s seat determined annually based on the selection of the Mayor Pro Tem. The arrangement suggests that the City Councilmember seated on the Mayor's left-hand side is next in line to be Mayor Pro Tem.

The municipal code establishes a term of one year for the office of Mayor Pro Tem. Staff recommends that the City Council select one of its members to serve as Mayor Pro Tem beginning on January 1, 2026, and ending on December 31, 2026.

The selection of Lawndale's Mayor Pro Tem begins with the Mayor calling for nominations from the floor.

Nominations do not require a second. If City Councilmembers nominate more than one person, the City Council should then vote on each nominee individually and in the order nominated. Each City Councilmember may vote for only one nominee.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this staff report.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint one of its members to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for a term beginning on January 1, 2026, and ending on December 31, 2026.

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Policy Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures

BACKGROUND
The use of electronic signatures on legally binding documents has become increasingly prevalent. The benefits of allowing electronic signatures include reduced time, paper, and cost associated with transmitting and approving physical documents. Additional benefits include improved customer service and convenience to those performing transactions with the City, and an easily accessible audit trail of when documents are modified and signed. This policy will authorize the use of electronic signatures on City of Lawndale documents while allowing the City to strike a balance between flexibility and the need for signature security and integrity.

STAFF REVIEW
Staff is increasingly asked to execute contracts electronically; however, are unable to do so without a policy from the City Council authorizing electronic signatures. Electronic signature services that meet the Secretary of State’s standards for “digital signatures” in Title 2, Division 7, Chapter 10, of the California Code of Regulations, may in accordance with Government Code section 16.5, be used for government communications and transactions. This action would establish a City policy in compliance with Government Code Section 16.5.

If the City elects to use an electronic signature, that electronic signature shall have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature if and only if it embodies all of the following attributes:

1. It is unique to the person using it.

2. It is capable of verification.

3. It is under the sole control of the person using it.

4. It is linked to data in such a manner that if the data is changed, the digital signature is invalidated.

5. It conforms to regulations adopted by the Secretary of State.

The City Manager, or their designee, shall determine acceptable technologies and vendors consistent with industry best practices to ensure the security and integrity of the data and the signature.

Staff has attached the City policy, Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures (Attachment A), that defines the use of electronic signatures in detail.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report and Resolution No. CC-2512-060, and approved the resolution as to form.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no fiscal implications associated with authorizing electronic signatures. However, signatures will require secure authentication by using an electronic signature service such as Docusign. If City Council authorizes electronic signatures, staff will explore costs and options further.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council 1.) Adopt Resolution No. CC-2512-060 establishing a City policy authorizing the use of an electronic signature in lieu of a written signature on a document in which a signature is required; or 2.) Provide staff with alternate direction.

Attachments
Attachment A Council Policy Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures.pdf Attachment B Resolution CC-2512-060 Authorizing Electronic Signatures.pdf

ATTACHMENT A
Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 1 ends

COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT:

Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures
POLICY NO.: 107-25 DATE ADOPTED:
12/15/25
AUTHORITY:

Resolution No. CC-2512-060
PURPOSE:

1. Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines and standards for the use and acceptance of an approved electronic signature, in lieu of a written signature, on documents in which a signature is required or used, which complies with the requirements of Government Code Section 16.5 and this policy. This policy does not supersede laws that specifically require a written signature, nor does it limit the right or option to conduct the transaction on paper or in non-electronic form and the right to have documents provided on paper.

This electronic signature policy permits the City of Lawndale (“City”) to use electronic signatures in lieu of manual signatures, when permitted by law. This policy establishes when an electronic signature may replace a manual signature. In such situations, affixing an electronic signature to the document in a manner consistent with this policy shall satisfy the City's requirements for signing a document.

2. Background
Electronic signatures are becoming common and promote efficiency. An electronic signature contains who signed an electronic document, the processes they followed to do it and their intent to act based on that agreement. Docusign, Adobe Sign, and HelloSign are examples of Electronic Signature Service Providers.

3. Legal Authority
This policy is consistent with the law and other City policies.

4. Definitions

1. Electronic signature: an electronic sound, symbol, or process attached to or logically associated with an electronic record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the electronic record. It is a digital form of a wet signature that is legally binding.

2. Manual signature: an original wet signature applied to a document.

3. Security procedure: a procedure employed to verify that an electronic signature, record, or performance is that of a specific person or for detecting changes or errors in the information in an electronic record.

4. Digitally Signed Communication: a message that has been processed by an acceptable technology, pursuant to 2 CCR§ 22003, in such a manner that ties the message to the signer.

Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 2 ends

POLICY:
a. Use and Acceptance of Electronic Signatures:

The City encourages the use of electronic signatures in internal and external activities, documents, and transactions when feasible and permitted by law. To the extent permitted by law, the city accepts electronic signatures as legally binding.

Electronic signature services that meet the Secretary of State’s standards for “digital signatures” in Title 2, Division 7, Chapter 10, of the California Code of Regulations, may in accordance with Government Code section 16.5, be used for all government communications and transactions. i. Each department will cooperate with all City Manager Administrative and City Council Policies when using electronic signatures.
ii. Electronic Signature Service Providers shall be approved by the City Manager with the recommendation of the Information Technology Manager as set forth in section e. below. iii. The City Manager may require the use of manual or electronic signatures at their discretion. iv. Nothing in this policy shall require the City to use or permit the use of electronic signatures when a wet/manual signature is required.
v. If the City elects to use an electronic signature, that electronic signature shall have the same force and effect as the use of a manual signature if it embodies all the following attributes:

A. It is unique to the person using it.

B. It is capable of verification.

C. It is under the sole control of the person using it.

D. It is linked to data in such a manner that if the data is changed, the electronic signature is invalidated.

E. It conforms to regulations adopted by the Secretary of State. vi. For agreements, all parties must agree to conduct the transaction by electronic means, when using electronic signatures.
vii. Contracts signed by electronic signature must specifically state that the parties to the contract agree to execution by electronic means. The following provision is to be included in all agreements when using electronic signatures:

Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy has been signed by both parties. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart. The parties hereby expressly agree to the use of electronic signatures, which shall be deemed to have the same effect as an original signature. This Agreement and any amendment will be considered executed when the signature page of a party is delivered by facsimile or other electronic transmission.

Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 3 ends

b. Prohibited Use:

The use of electronic signatures is prohibited on documents subject to the Uniform Commercial Code, certain transactions related to car purchases, licensing of vehicles, certain telephone transactions, certain insurance and group disability policies, tenant notices, bank deposit agreements, letters of credit, investment securities, any secured transactions (i.e. financing documents), EFT agreements, and any other transactions where an electronic signature is prohibited by the California Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.

Document Type Electronic Signature
Acceptable? Notes
Memos, correspondence, forms,
and documents intended for use
within the city or with outside
agencies.

Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must
maintain proper signing authority.

Contracts/Agreements Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must maintain proper signing authority.

Legislative Documents
(Resolutions/Ordinances/
Minutes/Public Hearing Notices)
Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must
maintain proper signing authority.

Documents requiring
notarization or other witness,
including real estate transactions
No Wet/Manual signature required.

Certain transactions listed in Civil
Code 1633.3 where electronic
records and electronic signatures
may not be used.

No Wet/Manual signature required.

City staff must be mindful of any restrictions outlined in this document. If there is a question about the legal use of electronic signatures, please consult the City Attorney. c. Signing Authority Limited to the City’s Purchasing Policy and/or Purchasing Limits:

Signing authority for purchasing limits should be in accordance with the City’s adopted purchasing policy limits found in the City Council Policy Manual.
d. Storage and Archiving Electronically Signed Documents:

All electronically signed documents must be stored and retained according to the City of Lawndale’s adopted Records Retention Schedule found in the City Council Policy Manual.

If a document exists only electronically, steps should be taken to ensure that a fixed version of the final document is stored in the City's electronic filing system. The Departments should work with the City Clerk’s Department in developing an electronic filing system in a manner that is consistent with the City's document retention policy and any applicable laws. e. Responsibility:

The City Manager, or their designee, shall determine acceptable technologies and vendors consistent with industry best practices to ensure the security and integrity of the data and the signature. Periodic reviews will be implemented for appropriateness and continued applicability of electronic signatures.

Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 4 ends

All City users of electronic signature technology shall conform to the rules set forth in the City's Electronic Signature Policy.

References:

Per the Unified Electronic Transaction Act (Civil Code sections 1633.1 et seq.), a signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form. See Civ. Code, § 1633.7(a).

If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law. See Civ. Code, § 1633.7(d).

An electronic signature is attributable to a person if it was the act of the person. See Civ. Code, § 1633.9(a). The act of the person may be shown in any manner, including a showing of the efficacy of any security procedure applied to determine the person to which the electronic signature was attributable. (Id.)
For transactions in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, the City must comply with the federal Electronic Records and Signatures in Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. § 7001 et seq.) and its implementing regulations, including 27 CFR 73.11.

See also Government Code section 16.5, authorizing use of digital signatures for all public agency transactions where the technology used for the digital signature conforms with 2 Cal. Code Regs. section 22000 et seq.

ATTACHMENT B
Resolution No. CC-2512-060 Page 1 of 2
Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures
RESOLUTION NO. CC-2512-060

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING A POLICY AUTHORIZING ELECTONIC SIGNATURES
WHEREAS, the use of electronic signatures on legally binding documents has become increasingly prevalent; and

WHEREAS, electronic signature services that meet the Secretary of State’s standards for “digital signatures” in Title 2, Division 7, Chapter 10, of the California Code of Regulations, may in accordance with Government Code section 16.5, be used for government communications and transactions; and

WHEREAS, City staff has increasingly been asked to execute contracts electronically; however, are unable to do so without a policy from the City Council authorizing electronic signatures; and WHEREAS, the benefits of allowing electronic signatures include reduced time, paper, and cost associated with transmitting and approving physical documents; and WHEREAS, this policy applies to all employees of the City of Lawndale and governs all uses of electronic signatures and electronic records used to conduct the official business of the City of Lawndale.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA, does hereby establish and adopt the policy to authorize the use of an electronic signature in lieu of a written signature on a document in which a signature is required attached hereto as Exhibit A.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 2025. _______________________________
Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
ATTEST:

Resolution No. CC-2512-060 Page 2 of 2
Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures
State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) SS
City of Lawndale )
I, Erica Harbison, City Clerk of the City of Lawndale, California, do hereby certify that the City Council of the City of Lawndale duly approved and adopted the foregoing Resolution No. CC-2512-060 at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of December, 2025, by the following roll call vote:

Name Voting Present, Not Voting Absent Aye No Abstain Not Participating Robert Pullen-Miles, Mayor
Pat Kearney, Mayor Pro Tem
Sirley Cuevas
Bernadette Suarez
Francisco M. Talavera
_______________________________
Erica Harbison, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Gregory M. Murphy, City Attorney
Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 1 ends

COUNCIL POLICY
SUBJECT:

Authorizing the Use of Electronic Signatures
POLICY NO.: 107-25 DATE ADOPTED:
12/15/25
AUTHORITY:

Resolution No. CC-2512-060
PURPOSE:

3. Legal Authority
This policy is consistent with the law and other City policies.

4. Definitions

2. Manual signature: an original wet signature applied to a document.

4. Digitally Signed Communication: a message that has been processed by an acceptable technology, pursuant to 2 CCR§ 22003, in such a manner that ties the message to the signer.

Exhibit A
Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 2 ends

POLICY:
a. Use and Acceptance of Electronic Signatures:

A. It is unique to the person using it.

B. It is capable of verification.

C. It is under the sole control of the person using it.

D. It is linked to data in such a manner that if the data is changed, the electronic signature is invalidated.

Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 3 ends

b. Prohibited Use:

Document Type Electronic Signature
Acceptable? Notes
Memos, correspondence, forms,
and documents intended for use
within the city or with outside
agencies.

Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must
maintain proper signing authority.

Contracts/Agreements Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must maintain proper signing authority.

Legislative Documents
(Resolutions/Ordinances/
Minutes/Public Hearing Notices)
Yes Electronic Signature is recommended/Must
maintain proper signing authority.

Documents requiring
notarization or other witness,
including real estate transactions
No Wet/Manual signature required.

Certain transactions listed in Civil
Code 1633.3 where electronic
records and electronic signatures
may not be used.

No Wet/Manual signature required.

All electronically signed documents must be stored and retained according to the City of Lawndale’s adopted Records Retention Schedule found in the City Council Policy Manual.

Council Policy No. 107-25

Page 4 ends

All City users of electronic signature technology shall conform to the rules set forth in the City's Electronic Signature Policy.

References:

If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law. See Civ. Code, § 1633.7(d).

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Diane Parsley, Executive Assistant
SUBJECT: Appointment to Vacancy on the SBWIB Lawndale Business Private Sector Seat

BACKGROUND
In 1983, the City of Lawndale entered into a joint powers agreement with the cities of El Segundo, Gardena, Hawthorne, Hermosa Beach, Inglewood, Manhattan Beach, and Redondo Beach to establish an employment and training system under the Federal Job Training Partnership Act. The agreement established a Business Private Industry Council consisting of representatives from (a) the private sector and (b) educational agencies, organized labor, rehabilitation agencies, community-based organizations, economic development agencies, and the public employment service.

Each member city appoints representatives to the Business Private Sector Seat on the basis of the proportion of its respective share of funds received under the act. The City of Lawndale has two (2) Business Private Sector seats with the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB) that are currently represented as noted below.

1.) Eduardo Leiva - Levia Group LLC, Leiva Holdings, Inc., and Azucanela LLC Term: July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2026

2.) Christina Q. Smith, Curly Gurl Luv Beauty Supply
Term: July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2028
Filled vacant seat after City Council re-affirmed the SBWIB nomination on September 16, 2024.

Mr. Eduardo Leiva, Chief Executive Officer of the Levia Group, resigned from the South Bay Workforce Investment Board seat on July 23, 2025. This has created a vacancy for Lawndale representation on the business private sector seat.

Any business organization in the City can make a recommendation to the City Council for an individuals appointment to the Business Private Sector seat, or the City Council can submit their own recommendation to the SBWIB. The SBWIB states that the business representative can be someone who has a business interest inside or outside of the City they represent.

The appointee must be available to attend eight (8) meetings per year, consisting of four (4) meetings of the quarterly SBWIB Board and four (4) quarterly committee meetings. The appointee will be assigned a committee during an orientation, once the appointment process is completed. The completion of a Fair Political Practices Commission Statement of Economic Interest - Form 700 is also required.

STAFF REVIEW
On November 13 and 18, 2025, respectfully, the SBWIB informed the City of Lawndale of a vacancy that will need to be filled due to the resignation of Mr. Eduardo Leiva.

The SBWIB has submitted a name for consideration and supports the nomination of Mr. Carlos Ferreira, owner of King of Wings, a local restaurant in the city of Lawndale. Background information of Mr. Carlos Ferreira is attached. The current vacant seat has a term of office that will expire June 30, 2026.

The SBWIB requests that the City Council fill the current vacant seat that has approximately 6 months left, expiring June 30, 2026, and the upcoming new four (4 year) term from July 1 2026 to June 30, 2030, with the same nominee. The SBWIB requests the City appoint and re-affirm the SBWIB's nomination of Mr.

Carlos Ferreira as the Lawndale Business Private Sector Representative to serve on the SBWIB. The exact term start date will be effective upon ratification by the South Bay Workforce Investment Area Chief Locally Elected Official, which is the City of Inglewood Mayor and City Council.

LEGAL REVIEW
None.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1.) Re-affirm the SBWIB's nomination for appointment of Mr. Carlos Ferreira, owner of King of Wings, as the City of Lawndale representative on the SBWIB Business Private Sector seat, to fill the current vacant seat until expiration on June 30, 2026, and a new four (4) year term beginning July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2030; or

2.) Provide further direction to staff.

Attachments
A - Letter to City Manager from SBWIB dated Nov 18 2025 B - Letter to Mayor and City Council from SBWIB_Nov 13 2025 C - Professional Summary of Carlos Ferreira
D - SBWIB 2026 Meeting Schedule

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Michael Reyes, Municipal Services Director SUBJECT: Discussion of E-Bike Urgency Ordinance

BACKGROUND
E-bikes have become increasingly popular in Southern California and recent reports, including incidents of violence linked to E-bike users, have prompted other cities, such as Yucaipa and Rancho Cucamonga, to adopt ordinances regulating their use. The City of Lawndale adopted its E-bike ordinance several years ago and has made changes to it in recent years as the use of E-bikes and motorized scooters have become more prevalent.

STAFF REVIEW
Staff has reviewed the recently adopted e-bike regulations, including ordinances from the Cities of Yucaipa and Rancho Cucamonga and a recent article on E-bike related violence, and recommends the City Council consider whether or not to pursue either an amendment to the existing ordinance or for the existing City of Lawndale ordinances regarding E-bikes usage to remain as they are.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this report and approves it to form.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Council review recently adopted e-bike regulations that other cities have enacted and give direction to City Staff to pursue one of the following three options:

Option 1) Pursue an urgency ordinance, as E-bikes constitute an immediate danger and threat to public safety;
Option 2) Pursue a regular ordinance, as E-bikes have the potential to be a greater threat to public safety than previously thought; or
Option 3) Leave existing ordinances regarding E-bikes as they are, including maintaining current enforcement levels.

Attachments
News Article
Yucapia - Ordinance No. 474-U E-Bikes.pdf
Rancho Cucamonga - 1039 - Ordinance.pdf
Lawndale 1157-19.pdf

ATTACHMENT A

ATTACHMENT B
1 ORDINANCE NO. 474U

AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.18 TO TITLE 9 OF THE YUCAIPA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING

THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E-CONVEYANCES IN PUBLIC AREAS
WHEREAS, the City of Yucaipa ("City") is committed to ensuring the public health, safety, and welfare of all its residents and visitors; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the importance of fostering sustainable transportation options while maintaining public safety and accessibility for all users of public spaces; and WHEREAS, bicycles and e-conveyances (electric bicycles, scooters, and similar devices) have become increasingly popular modes of transportation and recreation within the City; and WHEREAS, the use of bicycles and e-conveyances in public spaces presents both benefits and challenges, including safety concerns for riders, pedestrians, and motorists; and WHEREAS, the City has observed a significant increase in traffic incidents involving e-conveyance users and motor vehicles with their increasing popularity, often due to higher speeds and unsafe riding practices; and
WHEREAS, the public has expressed concerns regarding the unsafe operation of e-conveyances, including reckless riding behaviors that pose risks to riders, pedestrians, drivers, and others in public spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City aims to promote the safe use of bicycles and e-conveyances by implementing regulations that align with state law and best practices in transportation safety; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to educating its residents and visitors on the safe operation of bicycles and e-conveyances to prevent accidents and other traffic hazards and promote responsible use of these transportation modes; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that providing clear guidelines for the operation of bicycles and e-conveyances in public spaces will improve the quality of life for all residents and visitors.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Municipal Code Amendment.

Chapter 9.18, “Regulating the use of Bicycles and E-Conveyances,” is hereby added to Title 9 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code to read as follows:
2 Chapter 9.18
Regulating the use of Bicycles and E-Conveyances

9.18.010 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning set forth in this section:
"Bicycle" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 231, as it may be amended from time to time.
"Bicycle Lane" has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890.4, as it may be amended from time to time.
"Bicycle Path or Bicycle Trail" has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 231.5, as the provisions may be amended from time to time.
“City” means the City of Yucaipa.
"E-Conveyance" means any electric bicycle or e-bike, electric scooter, electrically motorized skateboard, or other device that is designed to convey one or more people and is capable of being powered by human propulsion or electric motor propulsion. "Electric Bicycle" or "E-Bike" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 312.5, as it may be amended from time to time, and which, as of the date of the adoption of this section, provides that an "electric bicycle" is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts, and are categorized under Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3.
"Electrically Motorized Skateboard" has the same meaning as defined in the California Vehicle Code Section 313.5, as it may be amended from time to time. "Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 313, as it may be amended from time to time. "Minor" means any person under the age of eighteen.
"Narrow Width Lane" means a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.
"Off-Highway Motorcycle" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 436, as it may be amended from time to time.
3 "Pedestrian" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 467, as it may be amended from time to time.
"Public area" means any outdoor area, public alley, parkway, public transportation path, roadway, right-of-way, sidewalk, park, trail, paseo, pathway or street that is owned, granted by easement, operated or controlled by the City.
"Unsafe manner" is defined as an act in violation of the City Municipal Code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable state or federal law. For purposes of this section, operation of a bicycle or e-conveyance in an "unsafe manner" also includes operating in such a way that constitutes a danger to the operator, passenger, other motorist, other rider, pedestrian, or property. "Vehicle" has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be amended from time to time.

9.18.020 Operation.

A. No person shall ride a bicycle or e-conveyance in an unsafe manner, as defined under Section 9.18.010, on any publicly owned property, including but not limited to a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path, trail, or lane, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel. Examples of riding in an unsafe manner include, but are not limited to, the following actions:

1. Riding on a public street or bikeway against the flow of traffic.

2. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required.

3. Operating an e-conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers.

4. Failing to obey posted traffic or other signs.

5. A person under the age of 18 riding without a properly fitted and fastened helmet.

6. Engaging in racing, speed, or stunt contests.

7. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times.

8. Operating a bicycle or e-conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing taking into account the weather, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and the surface and width of the sidewalk or roadway.

9. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are present.

B. Persons riding or operating bicycles or electric bicycles shall not ride more than two abreast, except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.

C. Any person operating a bicycle or e-conveyance who is emerging from an alley, driveway, bicycle path, building or otherwise approaching upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area, shall 4 yield the right-of-way to all pedestrians on such sidewalk or sidewalk area, and upon entering a bicycle lane, highway, or street shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles, bicycles, or e-conveyances on the roadway.

D. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance in any City park, except on trails that are approved for bicycle or e-conveyance use. The operation of bicycles or e-conveyances is strictly prohibited on dirt, grass, athletic fields, landscaped areas, or any other nonapproved surfaces within any City park.

E. No person shall operate a bicycle or e-conveyance while holding and operating a handheld wireless telephone or an electronic wireless communications device unless the wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation, and it is used in that manner while riding.

F. No person shall operate a bicycle or electric bicycle on any sidewalk, except:

1. A person may ride a bicycle or electric bicycle on any area designated as a driveway;

2. Any area designated as a bikeway by the City Council; or

3. To avoid a dangerous situation on the road or an obstacle.

9.18.030 Electric Off-Highway Motorcycles.

A. No person shall operate an electric off-highway motorcycle of any model (e.g., Sur-Ron, Talaria, E Ride Pro) on any publicly-owned property, including but not limited to, a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path or trail, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel.

B. Electric off-highway motorcycles are only allowed to be operated in areas specifically designated for off-highway vehicle recreation, or on private property with the express permission of the property owner. Unlike electric bicycles or mopeds, such vehicles are not eligible for highway registration and cannot be retrofitted for on-road use unless originally manufactured and certified for dual-purpose operation.

9.18.040 Equipment.

A. Every bicycle, including electric bicycles, when operated within the City, shall comply with all of the equipment requirements contained in California Vehicle Code Section 21201 or successor statute.

B. Any minor operating or riding as a passenger upon a bicycle or e-conveyance in a public area or any other place open to the public for vehicle and pedestrian travel must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet.
5 C. Any operator or passenger of a Class 3 electric bicycle, regardless of age, must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21213.

9.18.050 Parking.

No person shall temporarily leave unaccompanied, abandon, or park a bicycle or e-conveyance in a manner that obstructs vehicular traffic, the pedestrian travel way of any sidewalk or pedestrian path. No person may leave unaccompanied, abandon, or park a bicycle or e-conveyance on public property in violation of any law, ordinance, or government sign prohibiting the parking of bicycles or e- conveyances at such location.

9.18.060 Enforcement.

A. Any person, including a minor, who violates the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to penalties, fines, and enforcement procedures set forth in this code including, but not limited to, Chapter 1.12 of the Yucaipa Municipal Code.

B. Violations by Minors

1. The parent of any child, and the guardian of any ward, shall not authorize or knowingly permit any minor child or ward to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter.

2. In the case of a minor committing a violation under this Chapter, the parent or guardian may be held responsible for the violation and any associated penalties or fines.

3. If the minor's activities result in damage to public property, the City may, pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714.1, pursue a civil complaint against the minor's parent(s) or guardian(s) having custody and control of the minor for every tort resulting in property damage.

C. Impoundment

1. In addition to all other available penalties, the Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to take immediate possession of and transport a bicycle or e-conveyance for safekeeping to the nearest City facility or City-contracted tow yard if an unaccompanied minor is found in violation of any provisions of this Chapter, and the unsafe manner in which the device was operated constitutes an immediate danger to the health and safety of the juvenile operator or to members of the public, thus constituting an exigent circumstance.

2. The impounded device shall be released by the City to the parent or legal guardian of the minor if the individual owns the device.

3. Upon impoundment of any e-conveyance device under this Chapter, the minor shall be issued a receipt. Said receipt shall state the days, business hours, location, and process by which the owner may claim the impounded device within 30 days. The citation receipt shall also explain that unclaimed devices impounded for longer than 6 30 days will be disposed of subject to an opportunity for a pre-disposal hearing pursuant to Section 1.04.130 of this code or sold at an auction in accordance with laws governing the disposal of abandoned property.

9.16.070 Exemptions.

A. First responders, as defined under California Government Code Section 8562, are exempt from this Chapter while in the performance of their duties.

If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City Council of the City of Yucaipa hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 3. CEQA
The City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2) because there is no potential that the regulations for bicycles and e- conveyances will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. In addition, this Ordinance is not subject to CEQA under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3) because the Ordinance is an activity that is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

Section 4. Publication and Posting.

The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance, and the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption and shall cause the ordinance or a summary thereof to be published in accordance with state law.

Section 5. Urgency Findings; Immediate Effect.

The City Council of the City of Yucaipa finds and declares that this Ordinance is adopted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 36937(b) and is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. The facts constituting the urgency are as follows:

The City has experienced a substantial increase in the use of bicycles and e-conveyances, including electric bicycles, scooters, and similar devices, in and around public streets, sidewalks, parks, trails, and other public areas. This increase has been accompanied by observed unsafe behaviors and riding practices, including excessive speeds, riding against the flow of traffic, performing stunts and “wheelies” in active travel lanes and parking lots, operating without helmets, carrying 7 multiple riders on devices designed for a single rider, and riding through parks, landscaped areas, and pedestrian paths in a manner that endangers pedestrians and other users of public spaces and causes damage to public property. These activities present an immediate threat to the safety of riders, pedestrians, motorists, and other members of the public and create ongoing risks of collisions, injuries, and property damage.

In addition, the growing prevalence of high-powered electric off-highway motorcycles that resemble e-bikes, but are not street-legal and are not eligible for highway registration, has created confusion for users and enforcement personnel regarding where such devices may lawfully be operated, further increasing the risk of unsafe operation on City streets, sidewalks, parks, and other public areas.

Existing provisions of the Yucaipa Municipal Code do not expressly and comprehensively regulate the time, place, and manner of operation of bicycles, e-conveyances, and electric off-highway motorcycles in public areas, nor do they clearly authorize appropriate enforcement tools, including impoundment of devices operated by minors in a dangerous manner. The absence of clear local regulations and enforcement mechanisms has hindered the City’s ability to promptly and effectively address unsafe conduct and protect the public.

Immediate adoption of this Ordinance will establish clear operating rules, prohibit unsafe conduct, clarify restrictions on electric off-highway motorcycles, provide for enforcement and impoundment authority, and thereby reduce the risk of accidents, injuries, and property damage in public areas. Delay in the effectiveness of these regulations would leave the public exposed to continued unsafe operation of bicycles, e-conveyances, and electric off-highway motorcycles without adequate local controls.

For these reasons, the City Council finds that the immediate effectiveness of this Ordinance is necessary to protect the public peace, health, and safety, and therefore this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by at least a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, as provided in Government Code section 36937(b).

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 2025. ___________________________
Jon Thorp, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM
_________________________________ ___________________________ Ana V. Sauseda, MMC Steven Graham Pacifico
Director of General Services/City Clerk City Attorney

ATTACHMENT C
ORDINANCE NO. 1039

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.84 TO TITLE 10 OF THE

RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING

THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E- CONVEYANCES IN PUBLIC
AREAS
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (" City") is committed to ensuring the public health, safety, and welfare of all its residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes the importance of fostering sustainable transportation options while maintaining public safety and accessibility for all users of public spaces; and WHEREAS, bicycles and e- conveyances ( electric bicycles, scooters, and similar devices) have become increasingly popular modes of transportation and recreation within the City; and WHEREAS, the use of bicycles and e- conveyances in public spaces presents both benefits and challenges, including safety concerns for riders, pedestrians, and motorists; and WHEREAS, the City has observed a significant increase in traffic incidents involving econveyance users and motor vehicles with their increasing popularity, often due to higher speeds and unsafe riding practices; and
WHEREAS, the public has expressed concerns regarding the unsafe operation of econveyances, including reckless riding behaviors that pose risks to riders, pedestrians, drivers, and others in public spaces; and
WHEREAS, the City aims to promote the safe use of bicycles and e- conveyances by implementing regulations that align with state law and best practices in transportation safety; and WHEREAS, the City is committed to educating its residents and visitors on the safe operation of bicycles and e-conveyances to prevent accidents and other traffic hazards and promote responsible use of these transportation modes; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that providing clear guidelines for the operation of bicycles and e- conveyances in public spaces will improve the quality of life for all residents and visitors.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: Chapter 10. 84 is hereby added to Title 10 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows:

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 1 of 7
Chapter 10. 84— REGULATING THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E- CONVEYANCES

10. 84.010— Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning set forth in this section:

Bicycle" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 231, as it may be amended from time to time.

Bicycle Lane" has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890. 4, as it may be amended from time to time.

Bicycle Path or Bicycle Trail" has the same meaning as defined in Street and Highways Code Section 890. 4 and California Vehicle Code Section 231. 5, as the provisions may be amended from time to time.

E- Conveyance" means any electric bicycle or a- bike, electric scooter, electrically motorized skateboard, or other device that is designed to convey one or more people and is capable of being powered by human propulsion or electric motor propulsion.

Electric Bicycle" or" E- Bike" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 312. 5, as it may be amended from time to time, and which, as of the date of the adoption of this section, provides that an " electric bicycle" is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts, and are categorized under Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3.

Electrically Motorized Skateboard" has the same meaning as defined in the California Vehicle Code Section 313. 5, as it may be amended from time to time.

Electric Personal Assistive Mobility Device" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 313, as it may be amended from time to time.

Minor' means any person under the age of eighteen.

Narrow Width Lane" means a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.

Off-Highway Motorcycle" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 436, as it may be amended from time to time.

Pedestrian" has the same meaning as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 467, as it may be amended from time to time.

Public area" means any outdoor area, public alley, parkway, public transportation path, roadway, Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 2 of 7
right- of-way, sidewalk, park, trail, paseo, pathway or street that is owned, granted by easement, operated or controlled by the City.

Unsafe manner" is defined as an act in violation of the City Municipal Code, California Vehicle Code, or any other applicable state or federal law. For purposes of this section, operation of a bicycle or e- conveyance in an " unsafe manner" also includes operating in such a way that constitutes a danger to the operator, passenger, other motorist, other rider, pedestrian, or property.

Vehicle" has the same meaning as in California Vehicle Code Section 670, as it may be amended from time to time.

10. 84. 020 Operation.

A. No person shall ride a bicycle or e- conveyance in an unsafe manner, as defined under Section 10. 84.010, on any publicly owned property, including but not limited to a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path, trail, or lane, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel. Examples of riding in an unsafe manner include, but are not limited to, the following actions:

1. Riding on a public street or bikeway against the flow of traffic.

2. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required.

3. Operating an e- conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers.

4. Failing to obey posted traffic or other signs.

5. A person under the age of 18 riding without a properly fitted and fastened helmet.

6. Engaging in racing, speed, or stunt contests.

7. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times.

8. Operating a bicycle or e- conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions then existing taking into account the weather, pedestrian and vehicular traffic, and the surface and width of the sidewalk or roadway.

9. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are present.

B. Any person operating a bicycle or e- conveyance upon a street at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such a time shall ride as close as practicable to the right- hand curb or edge of the roadway, except under any of the following situations:

1. When overtaking and passing another bicycle, e- conveyance, or vehicle proceeding in the same direction;

2. When preparing for a left turn at an intersection or into a private road or driveway;

3. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions, including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, other e- conveyances, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface Ordinance No. 1039- Page 3 of 7
hazards, or narrow width lanes, that make it unsafe to continue along the right- hand curb or edge; or

4. When operating as close as practicable to the left- hand curb or edge of the roadway on a one- way street.

C. Persons riding or operating bicycles or electric bicycles shall not ride more than two abreast, except on paths or parts of a roadway set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles.

D. Any person operating a bicycle or e- conveyance who is emerging from an alley, driveway, bicycle path, building or otherwise approaching upon a sidewalk or sidewalk area, shall yield the right- of-way to all pedestrians on such sidewalk or sidewalk area, and upon entering a bicycle lane, highway, or street shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles, bicycles, or e- conveyances on the roadway.

E. No person shall operate a bicycle or e- conveyance in any City park, except on paved paths or trails that are specifically designated for bicycle or e- conveyance use. The operation of bicycles or e- conveyances is strictly prohibited on dirt, grass, athletic fields, landscaped areas, or any other non- designated surfaces within any City park.

F. No person shall operate a bicycle or e- conveyance in any parking lot of any property owned or operated by the City. Within such parking lots, bicycles or e- conveyances must be walked, not ridden.

G. No person shall operate a bicycle or e- conveyance while holding and operating a handheld wireless telephone or an electronic wireless communications device unless the wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device is specifically designed and configured to allow voice- operated and hands- free operation, and it is used in that manner while riding.

H. No person shall operate a bicycle or electric bicycle on any sidewalk, except:

1. A person may ride a bicycle or electric bicycle on any area designated as a driveway;

2. Any area designated as a bikeway by the City Council; or

3. To avoid a dangerous situation on the road or an obstacle.

10. 84.030 Electric Off-Highway Motorcycles.

A. No person shall operate an electric off-highway motorcycle of any model ( e. g., Sur- Ron, Talaria, E Ride Pro) on any publicly- owned property, including but not limited to, a public street, sidewalk, public right of way, park, bicycle path or trail, or any other public area open for vehicle or pedestrian travel.

B. Electric off-highway motorcycles are only allowed to be operated in areas specifically designated for off- highway vehicle recreation, or on private property with the express permission of the property owner. Unlike electric bicycles or mopeds, such vehicles are not eligible for highway Ordinance No. 1039- Page 4 of 7
registration and cannot be retrofitted for on-road use unless originally manufactured and certified for dual- purpose operation.

10. 84. 040 Equipment.

A. Every bicycle, including electric bicycles, when operated within the City, shall comply with all of the equipment requirements contained in California Vehicle Code Section 21201.

C. Any operator or passenger of a Class 3 electric bicycle, regardless of age, must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 21213.

10. 84. 050 Parking.

No person shall temporarily leave unaccompanied, abandon, or park a bicycle or e- conveyance in a manner that obstructs vehicular traffic, the pedestrian travel way of any sidewalk or pedestrian path, or on public property in violation of any government sign prohibiting parking of bicycles or econveyances at a location.

10. 84. 060 Enforcement.

A. Any person, including a minor, who violates the provisions of this Chapter shall be subject to penalties, fines, and enforcement procedures set forth in Chapter 1. 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.

B. Violations by Minors

1. The parent of any child, and the guardian of any ward, shall not authorize or knowingly permit any minor child or ward to violate any of the provisions of this Chapter.

2. In the case of a minor committing a violation under this Chapter, the parent or guardian may be held responsible for the violation and any associated penalties or fines.

3. If the minor' s activities result in damage to public property, the City may, pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714. 1, pursue a civil complaint against the minor' s parent( s) or guardian( s) having custody and control of the minor for every tort resulting in property damage.

C. Impoundment

1. In addition to all other available penalties, the Enforcement Officer shall have the authority to take immediate possession of and transport a bicycle or e- conveyance for safekeeping to the nearest City facility if an unaccompanied minor is found in violation of any provisions of this Chapter, and the unsafe manner in which the device was operated constitutes an immediate danger Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 5 of 7
to the health and safety of the juvenile operator or to members of the public, thus constituting an exigent circumstance.

2. The impounded device shall be released by the City to the parent or legal guardian of the minor if the individual owns the device.

3. Upon impoundment of any e- conveyance device under this Chapter, the minor shall be issued a receipt. Said receipt shall state the days, business hours, location, and process by which the owner may claim the impounded device within 30 days. The citation receipt shall also explain that unclaimed devices impounded for longer than 30 days will be disposed subject to an opportunity for a pre- disposal hearing or sold at an auction in accordance with laws governing the disposal of abandoned property.

10. 84. 070 Exemptions.

A. First responders, as defined under California Government Code Section 8562, are exempt from this Chapter while in the performance of their duties.

B. This Chapter is not intended to apply to or otherwise restrict electric personal assistive mobility devices used in a safe manner by physically disabled persons as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act( 42 U. S. C. Section 12101 et seq.) and section 36. 311 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations."
SECTION 2: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

SECTION 3: CEQA. The City Council finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (" CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060( c)( 2) because there is no potential that the regulations for bicycles and econveyances will result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. In addition, this Ordinance is not subject to CEQA under the CEQA Guidelines Section 15060( c)( 3) because the Ordinance is an activity that is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

SECTION 4: Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law.

Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 6 of 7
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2025.

A,
4- 1
Y
L. D nnis icha Ma
ATTEST:

Sevy, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of April 2025, and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 7th day of May 2025.

AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Stickler
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED: None
Executed this 8' day of May 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.

MP9- a 166))
im Sevy, City Wk
Ordinance No. 1039 - Page 7 of 7

ATTACHMENT D

South Bay Regional Housing Trust by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments Board of Directors

REQUEST
Staff from the South Bay Cities Council of Government (SBCCOG) is asking for the City Council consideration that the City Council approve joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), which would help fund the development and construction of affordable housing in the South Bay

BACKGROUND
As part of a REAP 2.0 project funded through Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), SBCCOG has been working through the development of a South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT). If formed, the SBRHT would help fund the development and construction of affordable housing units in cities who are members of the trust, and only for development projects supported by the city in which it is proposed. Although the SBCCOG is leading the early feasibility work, the SBRHT would be a separate joint powers authority with its own Board of Directors. Four cities would have to approve the JPA for the SBRHT to form.

Over the past year, the SBCCOG’s consultant, CivicHome, has been developing a SBRHT strategic plan, joint powers agreement, staffing plan, budget, and programs for the SBRHT Board to consider adopting when formed. A strategic plan advisory committee consisting of SBCCOG Board members, city staff, and housing experts/affordable housing developers provided input over a series of four meetings throughout the process. CivicHome presented an update to the SBCCOG Board at its October 2025 meeting and to the South Bay City Managers group on November 19th.

At its meeting on November 20, 2025, the SBCCOG Board of Directors voted to recommend member agencies move forward with the formation of the SBRHT.

DISCUSSION
Since the SBCCOG began working on the SBRHT, more information about funding coming to the South Bay through Measure A has become available. In particular, the SBCCOG will be receiving approximately $7.3 million annually through LACAHSA’s “Production, Preservation, and Ownership (PPO)” program. LACAHSA also has agency matching funds that may be available and could increase that amount to around $14 million. Additionally, these funds along with other Measure A funding, could be used to offset most or all the SBRHT administrative costs, particularly during the startup period.

As SBCCOG staff began exploring opportunities to use the PPO funds while the SBRHT was being considered, it became evident that the SBCCOG is limited in its use of those funds in ways that the SBRHT would not be. Primarily, the SBCCOG is not allowed to make or develop loans so all allocations of PPO funds made by the SBCCOG would have to be in the form of grants or rental/operating subsidies. These funds would be given out to a project and never return for additional use. The SBRHT would have lending authority and could also provide soft development loans, construction/pre-development loans, preservation/acquisition stakes, master leasing, and direct service/homebuyer assistance programs. These approaches would be revenue generating and allow for these public dollars to come back to the trust over time and be reprogrammed to maximize their use. The San Gabriel Valley’s regional housing trust (formed several years ago) is generating over $230,000 annually in interest and loan fee revenue.

Although there will be administrative costs to operate the SBRHT, SBCCOG staff believes that most or all those costs could be covered through administrative dollars available through LACAHSA’s programs. This would allow for the SBRHT to offer low to no membership fees, particularly during the first year or two as the organization gets formed. Orange County and Gateway Cities trusts have also started with little or no membership fees and have been able to offset them through administrative funding received through grants and other funding going into their trusts. It is important to note however that whether there will be membership costs for the SBRHT after the first year will be determined by the Trust Board of Directors, not the SBCCOG. For the first year, start-up costs can be covered completely with the LACAHSA funds that the SBCCOG has received with SBCCOG Board approval.

If the SBRHT is not formed and the SBCCOG ultimately provides grants using PPO funds, many administrative costs will still be incurred. For example, the SBCCOG will still be required to hire consultant experts to evaluate and vet the housing developments seeking grant funding. These costs are practically unavoidable but are covered through Measure A funding.

Pending Legislation to Modify SBRHT
SBCCOG staff has been working with SBCCOG Legal Counsel and Senator Allen’s office to explore amendments to the initial SBRHT formation legislation. Although modeled off legislation for other trusts such as the one in San Gabriel Valley, several items have been re-evaluated since passage of that bill (SB 1444). The amendments being sought include:
- Removing the SBCCOG from involvement in determining the number of SBRHT Board of Directors, their selection, and the responsibility for filling vacancies.
- Adding language to provide flexibility for the SBRHT Board to determine when they choose their Chair and Vice-Chair. - Addition of the ability to fund the development and construction of moderate-income housing. - Allowing member agencies to appoint non-elected officials for SBRHT Board alternates Currently, SB 1444 requires the SBRHT Board (regardless of delegate or alternate status) to be a mayor, councilmember, or LA County Supervisor of the member agency. Several SBCCOG Board members suggested that non-elected officials be allowed to be alternate SBRHT Board members if the city so designates. This approach is similar to the Clean Power Alliance which has proven to be very helpful as deliberations among these special boards take a lot of time and it might be difficult for councilmembers to have the time for the necessary oversight.

When a bill to revise SB 1444 is drafted, the SBCCOG will be soliciting support letters from South Bay cities to encourage the Legislature to approve these changes. Despite these pending changes, the SBCCOG Board of Directors recommends approval of the SBRHT JPA with its current language and would recommend SBRHT members approve an amended JPA in the future after any SB 1444 revisions are enacted. The current JPA is written to follow current SB 1444 language and was developed through the South Bay City Managers working group and SBCCOG Legal Counsel Michael Jenkins.

FISCAL IMPACT
SBCCOG staff says there is no immediate fiscal impact associated with approving the South Bay Regional Housing Trust Joint Powers Agreement. If determined necessary and approved by its Board of Directors in the future, membership dues may be required.

CONCLUSION
SBCCOG staff recommends the City join the South Bay Regional Housing Trust and execute the Joint Powers Agreement, to assist in the development and construction of affordable housing in the South Bay.

ATTACHMENTS

1. South Bay Regional Housing Trust Joint Powers Agreement and Strategic Plan Summary Presentation

2. LACAHSA Funding & SBCCOG vs. SBRHT Presentation

3. South Bay Regional Housing Trust Joint Powers Agreement

STAFF CONCERNS
On December 10, 2025, SBCCOG staff hosted a a Housing Trust Virtual Presentation attended by various Community Development Department Directors/Managers throughout the South Bay. The Directors expressed their concerns had a wide variety of questions to SBCCOG staff. One of the items discussed was that in the long term fiscal analysis, members of the Housing Trust could expect to pay about $500,000 on an annual basis. However, the final contribution payments into the trust will be determined will be determined by the Board of the SBRHT. Additionally, SBCCOG staff is expected to present to other South Bay Cities in late January and early February. It may be in Lawndale's advantage to wait and see which other South Bay Cities approves or declines to establish the SBRHT.

Staff has concerns that the SBCCOG's request for the City to join the Housing Trust requires more discussion between SBCCOG staff and other Community Development Directors within the South Bay Area.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
Currently, this item is not expected to have any short term fiscal impact. However, formally joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust may have long term fiscal impacts.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Discuss SBCCOG's request and receive their presentation; or

2. Approve joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT) and authorize the Mayor to execute the Joint Powers Agreement (JPA), which would help fund the development and construction of affordable housing in the South Bay; or

3. Provide further direction to staff.

Attachments
SBCCOG Exhibits.pdf

SOUTH BAY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST

STRATEGIC PLAN OVERVIEW
&

JPA SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Mission Statement
• To empower South Bay cities with flexible funding,
strategic guidance, and technical assistance that advance local housing priorities, expand housing opportunity, and support the development and preservation of affordable
and supportive housing across the region.
• Vision Statement
• A South Bay region collaborating to expand housing
opportunities through innovation, strategic partnerships, and coordinated Trust resources—supporting access to
diverse housing choices that strengthen community
stability and economic vitality.
• Governance Board
• One Trust Board Director from each
member city + Two Trust Board
Directors representing housing experts.
• Trust Staff
• Option 1: SBCCOG Employees
• Option 2: Contracted Consulting Firm
• Organization Chart
• Advisory Committee Framework
• Purpose and Role
• Membership Composition
• Meeting frequency and output
• Benefits to the Trust

GOVERNANCE, TRUST STAFF, AND

ADVISORY COMMITTEE

TRUST FORMATION & IMPLEMENTATION
GOALS

1. Secure initial capital funding commitments.

2. Establish transparent, accountable, and sustainable governance.

3. Promote regional collaborative and shared solutions.

4. Strengthen local capacity through technical assistance.

5. Establish performance metrics and evaluation tools.

6. Building the Trust’s brand and demonstrating early impact.

7. Design and launch housing funding programs

SOUTH BAY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST

DRAFT JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS

AGREEMENT

INTRODUCTION
• 2022 Legislation added to the CA Government Code section 6539.9 authorizing the creation of the South Bay Regional Housing Trust.
• Purpose: Receive and leverage public and private funding for planning and construction of housing of all types and tenures for persons and families of Extremely-Low, Very-Low, and Low-Income.
• Term – The Effective Date of the JPA will be the date of approval by the fourth city to join the Trust.

LIMITATION ON POWERS
• Regulate land use within the jurisdiction of any of the Parties; • Levy, or advocate or incentivize the levying of, an exaction, including an impact fee, charge, dedication, reservation or tax assessment, as a condition of approving the funding for or approval of a development project;
• Require or incentivize inclusionary zoning requirements; • Require the Parties to dedicate or assign funding for any SBRHT obligations or programs; • Fund or approve a housing project or program that is not supported by the governing body of the jurisdiction (a city or the county) in which the proposed project is sited; • Require the Parties to accept or provide any number of housing units as a prerequisite to joining or remaining a member of SBRHT; and
• Affect the individual power of each Party separately to implement affordable housing projects and programs generated within its jurisdictional boundaries.

TERMS OF THE JPA
• One elected official from each Trust member City, appointed by that City Council + Two Housing Experts appointed by the City Managers Committee. • Withdrawal – anytime with written notice and executed copy of city resolution subject to notice received at least 90 days prior to start of fiscal year and payment of any administrative fees.
1 SOUTH BAY HOUSING TRUST
Why A South Bay Housing Trust?
• Voters approved Measure A in
2024; legislating ~$13 million
a year for Housing and
Prevention funding for
SBCCOG
• This presentation will talk
about the funds that are
dedicated to Production and
Preservation, and Ownership
of housing as those are the
funds we would be
considering for the proposed
Housing Trust
2 LACAHSA PPO FUNDS
Production, Preservation, and Ownership (PPO)
• SBCCOG mandated to
program $7.3 million of
LACAHSA PPO funds.
• LACAHSA agency
funds can also match
our funding – so
potentially +/- $14
million of funding for
our cities.
(allocations determined by
low income RHNA numbers)
3 SGV AND GATEWAY
SGV and Gateway Housing Trust Before LACAHSA
SGV and
Gateway
COGS
Housing
Trust
Housing
Trust +

LACAHSA

LACAHSA
• SGV and Gateway formed their Housing Trust first, and then incorporated LACAHSA funds into their Trust
2020/2023 2025
4 SBCCOG
SBCCOG Received LACAHSA Funding First

SBCCOG LACAHSA
• SBCCOG has received LACAHSA funding and is
contemplating a Housing Trust
2025
5 PROBLEM
SBCCOG May Need a Trust to Fulfill LACAHSA Portfolio
LACAHSA Product Portfolio:
• Grants
• Soft Development Loans (revenue generating)
• Construction/Pre-Development Loans (revenue generating) • Preservation Acquisition/Equity stakes (revenue generating) • Master Leasing
• Rental or Operating Subsidies
• Direct Service - Homebuyer Assistance (revenue generating) Activities in Red may not be possible under SBCCOG current authority – handicapping our ability to maximize our LACAHSA funding However, they would be possible under a Housing Trust
6 SGV REVENUE EXAMPLE
SGV Housing Trust Generating Revenue
• SGV Housing Trust is generating
over $230,000 a year in Interest and
Loan Fee Revenue
• Their Revolving Loan Fund will
receive its first loan repayment,
allowing their Trust to recycle those
funds to another project
• We can achieve similar results
with our LACAHSA funds, but
need a Housing Trust in order
to do it
7 ALL CITIES CAN BENEFIT
What about cities with no development opportunities?
If cities have no development opportunities, there are other ways to participate in LACAHSA PPO Funds + Housing Trust ▪ Preservation of existing affordable housing
▪ Master Leasing
▪ Rent or Operating Subsidies
▪ First Time Homebuyer Assistance
8 Evictions
• No city is immune to financial stress that
constituents face, whether they are renters
or homeowners
• Evictions are one pathway into
homelessness
9 SBCCOG LACAHSA
SBCCOG LACAHSA Activity FY25/26
• SBCCOG issued soft notice of funding
availability in September – sent to all cities
• Hawthorne and Inglewood may have viable
projects – currently being evaluated projects
totaling 120 units
• Other cities have reached out to discuss
interest in developing opportunities
• SBCCOG will be developing programs,
funding criteria, and documentation
requirements for the evaluation
This activity
is similar to a
housing trust
10 HOUSING TRUST SCENARIO
SBCCOG LACAHSA + Housing Trust Option
• Without a Housing Trust - Hawthorne and Inglewood – may be limited in how we can help them
• Will encourage those cities to also apply for LACAHSA agency funds • Option to wait for the Trust when a loan or other more complicated arrangement could be done – COG can only grant
• Recommendation to come back at a future meeting
• In order to maximize our LACAHSA funding – consider moving all LACAHSA Production, Preservation, and Ownership activities into the SBCCOG Housing Trust JPA

SBCCOG LACAHSA
2025 Housing
Trust
2026
11 SBCCOG LACAHSA
LACAHSA Production, Preservation, and Ownership
• IF HOUSING TRUST
• Housing Trust could work directly with developers on behalf of cities (pertinent for small cities)
• Developers would know to come to a Trust
• Cities must approve all projects funded by the Trust in their city • Benefits for all cities on LACAHSA projects
• Need to increase staffing and hire consultants
• NO HOUSING TRUST
• Cannot implement full LACAHSA Portfolio (Loans, Acquisitions, Ownership..) • Work directly with cities, but not work with developers on behalf of cities • LACAHSA would still benefit all cities
• Would still need to increase staffing and hire consultants 12 NEXT STEPS
Information You Need to Know to Decide
Questions?
99999.91743\44264840.1
1 | Page

JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT
of the

SOUTH BAY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST
THIS JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made this ____ day of ________, 2026 (the “Effective Date”), by and between the public agencies listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (each a “Party” and, collectively, the “Parties”).

RECITALS
A. The Parties are authorized to and have a strong interest in promoting the health, safety, and welfare of the residents within their geographic boundaries.

B. The Parties acknowledge that the State has declared the existence of a shortage of affordable housing.

C. The Parties find it in their mutual interest to increase the availability of affordable housing, workforce housing and supportive housing and to reduce homelessness in a coordinated manner on a regional level.

D. An adequate supply of housing throughout the South Bay subregion will provide social and economic benefits to residents and taxpayers of the Parties.

E. California Government Code section 6500 et seq. (“Joint Exercise of Powers Act” or “Act”) permits two or more public agencies to create joint powers authorities for the purposes cited herein and permits the agencies to exercise jointly any power that the public agencies could exercise separately, and further grants certain additional powers to such joint powers authorities.

F. The Parties find that each of them has the individual power to implement the housing projects contemplated by this Agreement making them eligible under the Act to enter into this Agreement.

G. In 2022, the Act was amended by the addition of California Government Code section 6539.9, which expressly authorizes the creation of a South Bay Regional Housing Trust by way of approval of this Agreement in order to promote public-private partnerships, nonprofit collaborations and otherwise to fund housing to assist the homeless population and persons and families of extremely low, very low, and low income as defined in Section 50093 of the California Health and Safety Code within the South Bay subregion.
99999.91743\44264840.1
2 | Page
H. This Agreement shall not be interpreted to limit any Party’s authority over land use decision making or otherwise limit their respective sovereign powers within their respective jurisdictions.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth below, the Parties agree as follows:

Section 1. Creation and Purpose.
(a) Creation of SBRHT. Pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, including Government Code section 6539.9, there is hereby created a public entity to be known as the “South Bay Regional Housing Trust” (“SBRHT”). Pursuant to Section 6503.5 of the California Government Code, SBRHT shall be a public entity separate and apart from the Parties and shall administer this Agreement.
(b) Purpose. This Agreement is made pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act for the purpose of creating the SBRHT as a public entity separate from the Parties to exercise common powers with respect to receiving and leveraging public and private financing and funds for the planning and construction of housing of all types and tenures for persons and families of extremely low-, very low-, and low- income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code, including, but not limited to, permanent supportive housing. The purpose of this Agreement shall be accomplished, and common powers exercised in the manner set forth in this Agreement. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude any Party from establishing, maintaining, or providing social programs or services to its respective residents as it deems proper and necessary.

Section 2. Term and Termination
(a) Term. This Agreement shall become effective, and SBRHT shall come into existence, upon the approval of this Agreement by the governing bodies of four eligible parties.

The Effective Date will be the date of approval by the fourth party. This Agreement shall thereafter continue in full force and effect until terminated pursuant to subdivision (b) of this section.
(b) Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by agreement of a majority vote of the Parties. Upon termination of this Agreement, SBRHT shall be dissolved and, after payment of or provision for payment of all liabilities, the assets of SBRHT shall be distributed to the Parties in proportion to the contributions of each Party to SBRHT and the amounts paid by each Party in connection with SBRHT’s activities.

Section 3. Powers and Duties of SBRHT.
(a) General Powers. SBRHT shall have all the powers common to the Parties to this Agreement necessary or convenient, specified, or implied, to accomplish the purpose of this Agreement as set forth in Section 1, subject to the restrictions set forth in this 99999.91743\44264840.1
3 | Page
Section 3, subdivision (c) below. Said powers shall be exercised in the manner provided in the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, including without limitation all powers set forth in Government Code section 6539.9, and, except as expressly set forth herein, subject only to such restrictions upon the manner of exercising such powers as are imposed upon the City of ____________, a ___________ city, in the exercise of similar powers. (b) Specific Powers. Without limiting the generality of the powers conferred in subdivision (a) of this Section 3, SBRHT is hereby authorized, in its own name, to do all of the acts necessary or convenient to the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement and the full exercise of the powers conferred in subdivision (a) of this Section 3, including but not limited to the following:

1. to make and enter into contracts;

2. to hire employees or contract for staff assistance, including but not limited to contracting with other public agencies;

3. to sue and be sued in its own name;

4. to apply for, accept, receive and disburse grants, loans and other aids from any agency of the United States of America, the State of California, Los Angeles County, a Party to this Agreement, or any other agency providing funding related to the purposes of this Agreement;

5. to invest any money in the treasury pursuant to Section 6505.5 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act that is not required for the immediate necessities of SBRHT, as SBRHT determines is advisable, in the same manner and upon the same conditions as local agencies, pursuant to Section 53601 of the California Government Code;

6. to apply for letters of credit or other forms of financial guarantees in order to enter into agreements in connection therewith;

7. to incur and discharge debts, liabilities, and obligations, subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement and to the extent permitted by law;

8. to assume ownership of affordability covenants governing a property from another entity in order to preserve the units as affordable;

9. to engage the services of private consultants to render professional and technical assistance and advice in carrying out the purposes of this Agreement;

10. to employ and compensate legal counsel determined appropriate by SBRHT in carrying out the purposes of this Agreement;

11. to contract for engineering, construction, architectural, accounting, environmental, land use, or other services determined necessary or convenient by SBRHT in connection with the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement; 99999.91743\44264840.1
4 | Page

12. for the purposes of enforcing affordable housing covenants or holding security interests for loans, to take title to, and transfer, sell by installment sale or otherwise, lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in real or personal property which SBRHT determines are necessary or convenient in connection with the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement;

13. for the purposes of renting space for SBRHT to operate, to lease to, and to lease from, a Party or any other person or entity, lands, structures, real or personal property, rights, rights-of-way, franchises, easements, and other interests in real or personal property which SBRHT determines are necessary or convenient in connection with the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement;

14. to solicit charitable contributions from private sources;

15. to acquire, hold or dispose of property, contributions and donations of property, funds, services and other forms of assistance from persons, firms, corporations and government entities;

16. to partner with Parties on funding solicitations and other opportunities for the purposes set forth in this Agreement, including but not limited to jointly exercising powers with a Party pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act;

17. to authorize and issue bonds, certificates of participation, or any other debt instrument repayable from funds and financing received and pledged by the SBRHT.

18. to propose amendments to this Agreement;

19. to the extent not herein specifically provided for, to exercise any and all other powers as may be provided for SBRHT in the Joint Exercise of Powers Act or any other applicable law; and

20. to carry out and enforce all the provisions of this Agreement. (c) Limitation on Powers. This Agreement does not authorize SBRHT do any of the following:

1. Regulate land use within the jurisdiction of any of the Parties;

2. Levy, or advocate or incentivize the levying of, an exaction, including an impact fee, charge, dedication, reservation or tax assessment, as a condition of approving the funding for or approval of a development project;

3. Require or incentivize inclusionary zoning requirements;

4. Require the Parties to dedicate or assign funding for any SBRHT obligations or programs;
99999.91743\44264840.1
5 | Page

5. Fund or approve a housing project or program that is not supported by the governing body of the jurisdiction (a city or the county) in which the proposed project is sited;

6. Require the Parties to accept or provide any number of housing units as a prerequisite to joining or remaining a member of SBRHT; and

7. Affect the individual power of each Party separately to implement affordable housing projects and programs generated within its jurisdictional boundaries.

Section 4. Members
The members of SBRHT shall be the Parties to this Agreement, and such other public agencies as may join SBRHT after execution of this Agreement. New members may join on the terms and conditions set forth in Section 10 hereof. Only the County of Los Angeles and cities within the jurisdiction of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments may be a party to this Agreement and a member of SBRHT. The SBRHT bylaws may provide for affiliate memberships or other categories of membership for eligible entities which do not want to be full members.

Section 5. Board of Directors
(a) Selection of Directors. SBRHT shall be governed by a Board of Directors selected as follows:

1. One elected official from each Party to this Agreement, appointed by that Party’s governing body and ratified by the governing board of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. Each Party may also appoint one of its elected officials as an Alternate Director, who may serve in the absence of the Party’s appointed Director.

2. Two Directors that are experts in homelessness or housing policy appointed by the South Bay Cities Council of Governments City Managers Committee and ratified by the governing board of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments . (b) Board Powers. Subject to the limitations of this Agreement and the laws of the State of California, the powers of SBRHT shall be vested in and exercised by, and its property and its affairs administered by, the Board of Directors.
(c) Advisory Bodies. The Board of Directors may appoint advisory bodies that may include such persons as are designated by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors shall adopt bylaws that govern the appointment of advisory bodies should it determine in its discretion to appoint such advisory bodies.
(d) Compensation. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation but shall be entitled to reimbursement for any expenses actually incurred in connection with serving as Director; provided such expenses have been previously approved by the Board of Directors and incurred in accordance with any SBRHT policies or procedures governing the same.
99999.91743\44264840.1
6 | Page
(e) Term. Members of the Board shall serve for a two-year term. There is no limit to the number of consecutive terms members may serve. In the event of a vacancy, the Party whose appointee has vacated the position shall appoint a replacement within 60 days of the effective date of the vacancy, subject to ratification by the governing board of the South Bay Cities Council of Governments. The replacement will serve out the remainder of the term of the Director that they replaced. The two Directors that are experts in homelessness or housing policy may be removed with or without cause at any time by a majority vote of the Board of Directors.
(f) Meetings of the Board of Directors.

1. Call, Notice and Conduct of Meetings. All meetings of the Board of Directors, including without limitation, regular, adjourned regular, special meetings and adjourned special meetings, shall be called, noticed, held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 et seq.

2. Regular Meetings. Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at such dates and times as the Board may fix by resolution from time to time. If any day so fixed for a regular meeting shall fall upon a legal holiday, then such regular meeting shall be held on the next succeeding business day at the same hour, unless otherwise determined by the Board. No notice of any regular meeting of the Board of Directors need be given to the individual Directors.

3. Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held whenever called by the Chairperson of the Board or by a majority of the Directors. Notice of special meetings shall be provided to all Parties.

4. Quorum. A majority of the seated members of the Board of Directors shall constitute a quorum at any meeting of the Board except that less than a quorum may adjourn a meeting to another time and place. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, actions and decisions of the Board of Directors may be taken by a majority of the quorum present at any meeting.

5. Minutes. The Board of Directors shall cause minutes of all regular, adjourned regular, and special meetings to be kept and presented to the Board for approval at a subsequent meeting.

6. Officers. The Board of Directors shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson from among its Directors at the first meeting held in each calendar year. In the event that the chairperson or vice chairperson so elected ceases to be a Director, the resulting vacancy shall be filled at the next regular meeting of the Board of Directors held after such vacancy occurs or at a special meeting called for that purpose. In the absence or inability of the chairperson to act, the vice chairperson 99999.91743\44264840.1
7 | Page
shall act as chairperson. The chairperson, or in the chairperson’s absence, the vice chairperson, shall preside at and conduct all Board of Director’s meetings.

7. Rules and Regulations. The Board of Directors may adopt, from time to time, by resolution, such rules, regulations, and bylaws for the conduct of its meetings and affairs as the Board determines is necessary or convenient.

Section 6. Staff and Treasurer
(a) Staff

1. SBRHT may contract with a Party or the SBCCOG for staff pursuant to Section 6(d), hire its own employees, or retain independent contractors, agents, or volunteers as the Board of Directors may deem necessary to carry out any of SBRHT’s powers, upon such terms and conditions as the Board may require, including the retaining of professional and technical assistance, provided that adequate funds are available in SBRHT’s budget and are appropriated by SBRHT therefor.

2. None of the officers, agents, or staff, if any, directly contracted by SBRHT shall be deemed, by reason of their roles or duties or contracted status, to be employed by the Parties.
(b) Treasurer and Auditor/Controller. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6505.5 and 6505.6, the Board of Directors shall appoint an officer or employee of SBRHT, or an officer or employee of a public agency that is a Party, or a certified public accountant to hold the offices of treasurer and auditor for SBRHT. Such person or persons shall possess the powers of and shall perform the treasurer and auditor functions for SBRHT required by Sections 6505, 6505.5 and 6505.6 of the Government Code, including any subsequent amendments thereto. Pursuant to Government Code Section 6505.1, the auditor and treasurer shall have charge of certain property of SBRHT. The treasurer and auditor shall assure that there shall be strict accountability of all funds and reporting all receipts and disbursements of SBRHT.

The treasurer and auditor of SBRHT shall be required to file an official bond with the Board of Directors in an amount which shall be established by the Board. Should the existing bond or bonds or any such officer be extended to cover the obligations provided herein, said bond shall be the official bond required herein. The premiums on any such bonds attributable to the coverage required herein shall be an appropriate expense of SBRHT. (c) Attorney. The Board of Directors shall have the power to appoint one or more legal advisors to SBRHT who shall perform such duties as may be prescribed by the Board. (d) Administrative Services and Reimbursement of Costs.

1. The Board of Directors may contract with a Party to provide necessary administrative services to SBRHT, including the services described in Section 6(a), (b) and (c). The amount charged by the Party to provide such services to SBRHT shall be fixed by 99999.91743\44264840.1
8 | Page
agreement between the Board of Directors and the governing body of the Party providing such services. In the absence of an agreement on costs, the Party providing services to SBRHT under this Section 6 may charge SBRHT the amounts necessary to recover the direct and indirect costs of such services.

2. If SBRHT contracts with a Party to provide SBRHT with administrative services through persons who are employees and officers of the Party, then any retirement liabilities associated with that Party’s employees and officers shall not constitute a liability of SBRHT or any other Party. This Section 6(d)(2) shall not preclude a Party providing administrative services to SBRHT pursuant to a contract with SBRHT from accounting for such salary and benefit costs when negotiating the rates that the Party will charge SBRHT for providing such services.

Section 7. Financial Provisions
(a) Fiscal Year. The Fiscal Year of SBRHT shall, unless and until changed by the Board of Directors, commence on the 1st day of July of each year and shall end on the 30th day of June of the next succeeding year except that the initial Fiscal Year of SBRHT shall commence on the Effective Date and end on the immediately following 30th day of June. (b) Budget.

1. General Budget. Within one hundred and twenty days (120) after the first meeting of the Board of Directors, a general budget for the first fiscal year shall be adopted by the vote of a majority of the total membership of the Board of Directors. The budget shall distinguish between administrative costs (i.e., the cost of operating SBRHT) and Program costs (i.e., the financing of the programs funded or sponsored by SBRHT). Thereafter, at or prior to the last meeting of the Board of Directors for each fiscal year, a general budget shall be adopted for the ensuing fiscal year or years by a vote of at least a majority of the total membership of the Board.

2. Expenditures for the Approved Budget. The payment of all SBRHT obligations is limited to the amount of appropriations allowed in SBRHT’s approved budget, except as it may be revised with the approval of a majority of the total membership of the Board of Directors.
(c) Contributions by the Parties.

1. Administrative Cost Contributions. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the Parties agree that they shall make annual contributions (each a “Fee” and collectively the “Fees”) towards the budgeted administrative costs of SBRHT as set forth in a duly adopted Board resolution. The Fees shall be assessed annually. After the first fiscal year, the Fees shall increase annually in an amount equal to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index for all urban consumers in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim area for the 12-month period preceding the year the Fees are assessed.

Payment of the Fees shall be due within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from the SBRHT. 99999.91743\44264840.1
9 | Page
The invoice shall indicate how the Fees were calculated. A Party's contribution to SBRHT's administrative costs shall be in the form of money, unless the Board of Directors approves another form of contribution such as services, personal property or use of real or personal property, or other in-kind contributions. The acceptance and valuation of any such non-monetary contributions may be used to offset in whole or part a Party’s contribution as determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Board of Directors. Notwithstanding the above, after the first fiscal year the Board of Directors may establish Fees in an amount the Board of Directors deems financially prudent.

2. Program Cost Contribution. The particular programs and program budget, funded, sponsored or operated by SBRHT, as well as the level of and mechanisms for the involvement of SBRHT and each Party, in such programs and program budget, shall be determined and approved by the Board of Directors.
(d) Accounts and Reports.

1. Books and Records. There shall be strict accountability of all SBRHT funds and accounts and report of all SBRHT receipts and disbursements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, SBRHT shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by good government accounting practice. The books and records of SBRHT shall be open to inspection at all reasonable times by each Party and its duly authorized representatives.

2. Annual Audit. The person appointed by the Board of Directors to perform the auditor function for SBRHT shall cause an annual independent audit of the accounts and records of SBRHT and records to be made by a certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants in accordance with Government Code section 6505. Such audits shall be delivered to each Party and shall be made available to the public.

3. Annual Financial Report. Pursuant to section 6539.9(d) of the Government Code, SBRHT shall publish an Annual Financial Report that shall describe the funds received by SBRHT and the use of such funds by SBRHT. The Annual Financial Report shall describe how the funds received by SBRHT have furthered the purposes of SBRHT. (e) Funds. Subject to the applicable provisions of any instrument or agreement which SBRHT may enter into, which may provide for a trustee or other fiscal agent to receive, have custody of and disburse SBRHT funds, the person appointed by the Board of Directors to perform the treasurer function for SBRHT shall receive, have the custody of and disburse SBRHT funds as nearly as possible in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, shall make the disbursements required by this Agreement in order to carry out any of the provisions or purposes of this Agreement.

Section 8. Amendments.
99999.91743\44264840.1
10 | Page
(a) This Agreement may be amended or modified with the approval of two-thirds of all the Parties through formal action approving such an amendment by the Parties’ respective governing bodies.
(b) No addition to, or alteration of, the terms of this Agreement, whether by written or oral understanding of the parties, their officers, employees or agents, shall be valid or effective unless made in the form of a written amendment which is formally adopted and executed by the Parties as provided in subparagraph (a) of this Section.

Section 9. Non-Liability for Obligations of SBRHT.
(a) The debts, liabilities, and obligations of SBRHT shall not be considered the debts, liabilities and obligations of any of the Parties or their respective officers, employees, agents or volunteers, or the personal debts, liabilities and obligations or the Directors, officers or employees of SBRHT.

1. Indemnification. The SBRHT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless each Party, its officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (the “Indemnitees”) from and against any loss, injury, claim, lawsuit, liability, expense, or damages of any kind or nature (collectively, “Claims”) brought by a third party which arises out of or in connection with SBRHT’s administration of this Agreement, including such third party claims arising out of or in connection with any Indemnitees acting within their authorized capacity as an officer, agent, employee, representative or volunteer of SBRHT. The SBRHT’s duty to defend and indemnify under this Section shall not extend to Claims otherwise arising out of the Indemnitees’ own active negligence, omissions or willful misconduct, whether in whole or part. The SBRHT shall finance its obligation pursuant to this Subsection by establishing a liability reserve fund, and/or by purchasing commercial insurance, and/or by joining a joint powers insurance authority (JPIA) as determined by the Board. In the event the SBRHT’s financial obligations to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, pursuant to this Subsection, exceed the liability reserve fund and/or the proceeds from any applicable insurance and/or JPIA coverage maintained by the SBRHT (hereinafter “Unfunded Liability”), a Party or Parties may meet and confer with SBRHT in good faith to negotiate alternative means or mechanisms by which SBRHT may fund such Unfunded Liability; however, in no event shall the event of an Unfunded Liability relieve, limit or waive SBRHT’s obligations of indemnity or defense to each Party as first set forth above in this Section. Nothing herein shall obligate any Party to indemnify or hold harmless SBRHT for any Unfunded Liability.

2. Assignment. Each Party shall assign to the SBRHT its rights, title, and interest to recover damages from any third party for Claims arising out of this Agreement, to the extent that the SBRHT has met its obligations to defend and indemnify such Party pursuant to this Section.
99999.91743\44264840.1
11 | Page

3. Survival. SBRHT’s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall survive and continue in full force and effect after withdrawal of any Party from this Agreement, including as to the withdrawing Party, or termination of this Agreement for any reason with respect to any Claims that occurred before the date of such withdrawal or termination.

Section 10. Admission and Withdrawal of Parties.
(a) Admission of New Parties. It is recognized that additional public agencies other than the original Parties, may wish to join SBRHT after the Effective Date. The County of Los Angeles and any city within the SBCCOG may become a Party to SBRHT upon such terms and conditions as are established by the Board of Directors. As a condition precedent to becoming a Party more than six months after the Effective Date, an eligible entity may thereafter become a Party to this Agreement; provided that (1) this Agreement is adopted by its governing body and (2) the eligible entity pays a late joining fee. The late joining fee shall be calculated by totaling the annual fee the eligible entity would have paid under this Agreement had it been a Party in all years prior and up until the Effective Date.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, an eligible entity’s late joining fee shall not exceed two times the amount of the applicable annual administrative fee existing at the time it becomes a Party. Payment shall be due within 30 days of receipt of an invoice from SBRHT. (b) Withdrawal from SBRHT. A Party may withdraw from SBRHT at any time upon its governing body’s adoption of a resolution stating the Party’s intent to withdraw from SBRHT and written notice of withdrawal accompanied by an executed copy of the resolution of intent to the SBRHT. The withdrawal of any Party, unless otherwise provided by the Board of Directors, shall be subject to the following prerequisites and conditions:

1. The withdrawal shall be effective immediately upon receipt by the SBRHT of the written notice of withdrawal, subject to subsection (2) below.

2. If the withdrawal notice is received by the SBRHT less than ninety (90) days before the start of a fiscal year or after the commencement of a fiscal year but before payment of that year’s Section 7(c) contribution, the withdrawal shall not be effective unless and until the withdrawing Party has fully paid that fiscal year’s contribution; otherwise, the notice of withdrawal shall be null and void.

3. Unless otherwise provided by a unanimous vote of the Board of Directors, withdrawal shall result in the forfeiture of that Party’s rights and claims relating to distribution of property and funds upon termination of SBRHT as set forth in Section 2 above.

Withdrawn members shall not be entitled to any reimbursement of Fees.

4. Withdrawal of a Party will not relieve that Party of prior financial obligations of liabilities unless otherwise approved by the Board.

Section 11. Notices.
99999.91743\44264840.1
12 | Page
(a) Notices required or permitted hereunder shall be sufficiently given if made in writing and delivered either personally or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the persons and entities listed at the addresses set forth in Exhibit A, or to such other address as may be designated in writing to SBRHT for formal notice.

Section 12. Miscellaneous.
(a) Section Headings. The section headings herein are for convenience only and are not to be construed as modifying or governing or in any manner affecting the scope, meaning or intent of the provisions or language of this Agreement. (b) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all together shall constitute but one and the same Agreement.
(c) Laws Governing. This Agreement is made in the State of California under the Constitution and laws of such State and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of California.
(d) Severability. Should any part, term, portion or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, be held to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise be rendered unenforceable or ineffectual it shall be deemed severable, and the reminder of this Agreement or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances shall continue to constitute the Agreement the Parties intended to enter into in the first instance. (e) Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the respective Parties. No Party may assign any right or obligation hereunder without the written consent of a majority of the other Parties.

Section 13. Sunset Date.

In the event that a source of funding is not identified and funding not obtained to cover SBRHT’s administrative costs on or before _____________, this Agreement will on that date expire automatically and be null and void without further action of the Parties.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their duly authorized officers as follows:
99999.91743\44264840.1
13 | Page
(NAME OF CITY)
______________________________
BY: (NAME/TITLE OF CITY OFFICER)
Dated: ___________________________
ATTEST:
___________________________________________
(NAME) City Clerk Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: __________________________________________
(NAME) City Attorney Date
99999.91743\44264840.1
14 | Page

EXHIBIT A
Parties to this Agreement and their Addresses for notice pursuant to Section 11 are as follows:

Recommendation to Continue to Use Everbridge as the Citywide Emergency Notification System

BACKGROUND
The City of Lawndale, like all cities is susceptible to emergencies, both naturally occurring and man made.

During these emergencies, it is imperative for cities to have an operational emergency broadcasting system to provide information to the public. At the December 5, 2022, City Council meeting the City Council elected to implement Everbridge as the mass notification system for the City of Lawndale. This system provides the City with the ability to communicate urgent messages to the entire City population through various platforms and devices, simultaneously, and in multiple languages.

STAFF REVIEW
For the past year, Staff have been using and updating the Everbridge system so that in the event of an emergency, the City will have the ability to communicate vital warnings and information to the public. The Everbridge Mass Notification System allows for mass messaging to thousands of devices across multiple formats including cell phones, land lines, text messaging systems, faxes, and emails. Everbridge also has the ability to broadcast alerts using multiple languages to target various population centers. Everbridge currently partners with every neighborhood city in the South Bay and is already operating successfully.

LEGAL REVIEW
No legal review is necessary, as the contract terms will not be changing. The City Attorney has reviewed this staff report.

FISCAL REVIEW
Staff anticipates a cost of $12,458.03 to cover one year’s fees and professional services costs which is a reduction from the cost for last year’s service fees. These costs have been budgeted for in the FY 25/26 budget and therefore no additional budget amendment is needed.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Renewal Quote for OneYear between the City of Lawndale and Everbridge.

Attachments
Everbridge Renewal Quotation 2026.pdf

Lucho Rodriguez, Public Works Director
Nick Petrevski, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT:

Notice of Completion for FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project

BACKGROUND
On June 16, 2025, City Council awarded a construction contract to Sequel Contractors, Inc. for the FY 2023- 24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project. At the same time, a separate contract was awarded for construction inspection services with SAAssociates, Inc.

The scope of work included surface repairs using 2-inch grind and overlay methods, reconstruction of localized asphalt pavement failures, removal and reconstruction of damaged curb, gutter, sidewalks, driveway approaches, cross gutters and ADA (Americans with Disabilities) curb ramps, and striping, manhole and valve adjustments, and traffic loop repairs.

STAFF REVIEW
The project was completed in conformance with the project plans and specifications by Sequel Contractors, Inc. The construction inspection services were performed by SA Associates and in-house staff. Construction began on July 14, 2025, and was completed on October 25, 2025. Staff recommends the City Council accept the work performed by Sequel Contractors, Inc. as complete and authorize staff to file a Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney has reviewed this report.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total allocated funds for this Capital Improvement Project was $2,201,000 from FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 annual budgets using various funding sources. The project cost breakdown was as follows:

Total Allocated Funding $ 2,201,000.00
Construction Cost including Contingency $2,085,316.69
Construction Inspection Services Cost $79,256.00
Total Project Cost: $2,164,572.69
Remaining Balance of allocated funds: $36,427.31

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept the project completion by Sequel Contractors, Inc., for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project.

2. Authorize staff to file the Notice of Completion with the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder County Clerk’s Office for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk replacement Project.

3. Authorize staff to release the retention in the amount of $104,265.84 for the FY 2023-24 Street Rehabilitation and FY 2024-25 Sidewalk Replacement Project.

Attachments
A. Project Location Map.pdf
Attachment A
14 3
8 9
6 5
13 4
10 7
2 1
11 12
15 16

CITY OF LAWNDALE
14717 BURIN AVENUE, LAWNDALE, CALIFORNIA 90260
PHONE (310) 973-3200 ♦ www.lawndalecity.org
DATE: December 15, 2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Dr. Sean M. Moore, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Report of Attendance at Meetings
No supporting documentation was forwarded to the City Clerk Department for this item.

Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Conference with Legal Counsel – Potential Litigation The City Council will conduct a closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2), to confer with legal counsel regarding a significant exposure to litigation, the facts and circumstances of which are not known to the potential plaintiff: one (1) case.

Vanesa Alvarez, Administrative Assistant
Yvette Palomo, Assistant City Clerk
SUBJECT: Public Employee Appointment
The City Council will conduct a closed session, pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b), regarding the appointment of an Interim City Manager.

Lawndale City CouncilDecember 15, 2025

Lawndale City Council
December 15, 2025