Agenda packet — Lemoore City Council, February 1, 2022

AGENDA
Please silence all electronic devices as a courtesy to those in attendance. Thank you. 6:30 pm CLOSED SESSION
This item has been set aside for the City Council to meet in a closed session to discuss matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4). The City Attorney will provide an oral report regarding the Closed Session at the beginning of the next regular City Council meeting.

1. Government Code Section 54957
Threat to Public Services or Facilities; Consideration of Tactical Response Plan Consultation with: Bruce German, Lemoore Volunteer Fire Department and Michelle Speer, Assistant City Manager

2. Government Code Section 54956.9
Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation
Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) or (3) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One Case

3. Government Code Section 54957
Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Manager
In the event that all the items on the closed session agenda have not been deliberated in the time provided, the City Council may continue the closed session at the end of the regularly scheduled Council Meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
7:30 pm REGULAR SESSION
a. CALL TO ORDER
b. INVOCATION
c. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
d. ROLL CALL
e. CLOSED SESSION REPORT
f. AGENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS, AND/OR DELETIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comment will be in accordance with the attached policy. This time is reserved for members of the audience to address the City Council on items of interest that are not on the Agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council. It is recommended that speakers limit their comments to three (3) minutes each and it is requested that no comments be made during this period on items on the Agenda. The Council is prohibited by law from taking any action on matters discussed that are not on the Agenda. Prior to addressing the Council, any handouts for Council will be provided to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council and appropriate staff. Public comment will be available for items on the agenda.

LEMOORE

CALIFORNIA

LEMOORE CITY COUNCIL

COUNCIL CHAMBER
429 C STREET
February 1, 2022
1 CEREMONIAL / PRESENTATION – Section 1
No Ceremonies / Presentations.

DEPARTMENT AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS – Section 2
2-1 Department & City Manager Reports
CONSENT CALENDAR – Section 3
Items considered routine in nature are placed on the Consent Calendar. They will all be considered and voted upon in one vote as one item unless a Council member or member of the public requests individual consideration. 3-1 Approval – Minutes – Regular Meeting – January 18, 2022 3-2 Approval – Resolution 2022-03 – Authorizing Continued Use of Remote Teleconferencing Provisions (AB 361)
PUBLIC HEARINGS – Section 4
Report, discussion and/or other Council action will be taken. 4-1 Public Hearing – General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05 (Brandt)
NEW BUSINESS – Section 5
Report, discussion and/or other Council action will be taken.

No New Business.

BRIEF CITY COUNCIL REPORTS AND REQUESTS – Section 6
6-1 City Council Reports / Requests
Upcoming Council Meetings
• City Council Regular Meeting, Tuesday, February 15, 2022 • City Council Regular Meeting, Tuesday, March 1, 2022
Agendas for all City Council meetings are posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting at the Council Chamber, 429 C Street and the Cinnamon Municipal Complex, 711 W. Cinnamon Drive. Written communications from the public for the agenda must be received by the City Clerk’s Office no less than seven (7) days prior to the meeting date. The City of Lemoore complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA of 1990). The Council Chamber is accessible to the physically disabled. Should you need special assistance, please call (559) 924-6744, at least 4 business days prior to the meeting.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
I, Marisa Avalos, City Clerk for the City of Lemoore, declare under penalty of perjury that I posted the above City Council Agenda for the meeting of February 1, 2022 at Council Chamber, 429 C Street and Cinnamon Municipal Complex, 711 W. Cinnamon Drive, Lemoore, CA on January 28, 2022. //s//
Marisa Avalos, City Clerk
2 CITY OF LEMOORE

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 1, 2022 @ 6:30 / 7:30 p.m.

Attendance and Public Comment Changes Due to COVID-19
The Lemoore City Council will be conducting its regular meeting on February 1, 2022. Given the current Shelter-In-Place covering Kings County and the Social Distance Guidelines issued by Federal, State, and Local Authorities, the City is implementing the following changes for attendance and public comment.

All upcoming regular and special City Council meetings will be open to fifteen (15) members of the public on a first come, first served basis and via Zoom. The meeting may be viewed through the following options:
• Join Zoom Meeting
• Please click the link below to join the webinar:
• https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81177112011?pwd=K2dWRnAxamVaYTNuSUpvUTBLS1lsQT09 • Meeting ID: 811 7711 2011
• Passcode: 388057
• Phone: +1 669 900 6833
The City will also provide links to streaming options on the City’s website and on its Facebook page.

If you wish to make a general public comment or public comment on a particular item on the agenda, participants may do so via Zoom during the meeting or by submitting public comments by e-mail to: [email protected]. In the subject line of the e-mail, please state your name and the item you are commenting on. If you wish to submit a public comment on more than one agenda item, please send a separate e-email for each item you are commenting on. Please be aware that written public comments, including your name, may become public information.

Additional requirements for submitting public comments by e-mail are provided below.

General Public Comments & Comments on City Council Business Items

For general public comments and comments regarding specific City Council Business Items, public comments can be made via Zoom during the meeting or all public comments must be received by e-mail no later than 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. Comments received by this time will be read aloud by a staff member during the applicable agenda item, provided that such comments may be read within the normal three (3) minutes allotted to each speaker. Any portion of your comment extending past three (3) minutes may not be read aloud due to time restrictions.

If a general public comment or comment on a business item is received after 5:00 p.m., efforts will be made to read your comment into the record. However, staff cannot guarantee that written comments received after 5:00 p.m. will be read. All written comments that are not read into the record will be made part of the meeting minutes, provided that such comments are received prior to the end of the City Council meeting.
3 Public Hearings
For public comment on a public hearing, all public comments must be received by the close of the public hearing period. All comments received by the close of the public hearing period will be read aloud by a staff member during the applicable agenda item, provided that such comments may be read within the normal three (3) minutes allotted to each speaker. Any portion of your comment extending past three (3) minutes may not be read aloud due to time restrictions. If a comment on a public hearing item is received after the close of the public hearing, such comment will be made part of the meeting minutes, provided that such comment is received prior to the end of the meeting.
*PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED THAT DO NOT

SPECIFY A PARTICULAR AGENDA ITEM WILL BE READ ALOUD DURING THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE AGENDA.*
The City thanks you for your cooperation in advance. Our community’s health and safety is our highest priority.
4 Item 3-1
January 18, 2022 Minutes
Lemoore City Council
Study Session Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:

At 5:30 p.m., the meeting was called to order.

ROLL CALL: Mayor: LYONS
Mayor Pro Tem: MATTHEWS
Council Members: GORNICK, ORTH

Absent: CHANEY
City Staff and contract employees present: City Manager Olson; Assistant City Manager Speer; City Attorney Lerner; Police Chief Kendall; Superintendent Carrillo; Deputy City Clerk Champion. 5:30 pm STUDY SESSION
SS-1 Kings Waste & Recycling (Avalos)
Deputy City Clerk Champion introduced Nicole Pena with KWRA to discuss a guide to recycling which included:
 Waste Law History
o 600 laws enacted between 1927 and 2021
 14 signed at end of 2021 legislative cycle
 1 veto
 32 failed
o Most Impactful
o AB 939
 Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989
• 25% diversion by 1995
• 50% diversion by 2000
o AB 32
 Air Board Regulation
 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
 Goal:
• Reduce Green House Gas Emissions to 1990 levels by 2020  AB 341
• Mandatory Commercial Recycling
• Adopted January 2012
• Goal
• 75% diversion by 2020
• Reduce commercial solid waste from landfills
• Reduce GHG emissions
 AB 1826
• Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling
• Adopted October 2014
• Effective April 1, 2016
• Goal
o 75% diversion by 2020
o Reduce commercial organic waste from landfills
o Reduce GHG emission
5 o Create jobs and expand recycling manufacturing in
California
o Production of renewable energy fuel
 AB 827
• Effective July 1, 2020
• Expands AB 341 and 1826
• Targets businesses that sell products meant for immediate consumption
o SB 1383
 What to recycle?
o Back to Basics Flyer
o What to put in the Blue Can:
 Glass, Jars, and Bottles
 Aluminum Cans and Tins
 Cardboard
 Plastic bottles and containers
Adjourned to Closed Session at 5:31 p.m.

CLOSED SESSION

1. Liability Claim
Government Code Section 54956.95
Claimant: Mr. Mark Reed
Agency Claimed Against: City of Lemoore

2. Government Code Section 54957.6
Conference with Labor Negotiator
Agency Designated Representatives: Mary Lerner, City Attorney and Michelle Speer, Assistant City Manager
Employee Organizations: General Association of Service Employees, Lemoore Police Officers Association, Lemoore Police Sergeants Unit, Police Professional Services Bargaining Unit, and Unrepresented

3. Government Code Section 54957
Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Manager
Closed Session adjourned at 7:05 p.m.

January 18, 2022 Minutes
Lemoore City Council
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:

At 7:30 p.m., the meeting was called to order.

ROLL CALL: Mayor: LYONS
Mayor Pro Tem: MATTHEWS
Council Members: GORNICK, ORTH

Absent: CHANEY
6 City Staff and contract employees present: City Manager Olson; Assistant City Manager Speer; City Attorney Lerner; Police Chief Kendall; Public Works Director Rivera; Deputy City Clerk Champion.

AGENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS, AND/OR DELETIONS
None.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
No Closed Session Report.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Barbara Hill stated that she has lived in Lemoore for almost 20 years. She was made aware that there is a feedlot being proposed near the SE corner of 41 and 198. She stated she has concerns with this project. She stated that it would destroy our neighborhoods. This is not an appropriate place for this project. She hopes that the City Council will not force her to sell her home.

David Brown stated that he does have concerns in regards to the cattle feedlot. It sounds like the City has concerns as well. The project will decrease property values in Lemoore. Traffic will be an issue. Air quality will diminish as well.

CEREMONIAL / PRESENTATION – Section 1
No Ceremonies / Presentations.

DEPARTMENT AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS – Section 2
City Manager Olson stated that the bid opening for the Bush Street overlay project. Will be coming to council for approval. The walls on the water tank at Station 7 are up. The City submitted a letter in opposition of the feedlot. It will be posted as a handout on the website. He welcomed calls and questions from the public.

CONSENT CALENDAR – Section 3
3-1 Approval – Minutes – Regular Meeting – January 4, 2022 3-2 Approval – Minutes – Special Meeting – January 5, 2022 3-3 Approval – Denial of Claim for Mr. Mark Reed
3-4 Approval – Appointment of Lemoore Planning Commissioners 3-5 Approval – Appointment of ARPA Ad Hoc Committee Members Items 3-4 and 3-5 were pulled for separate consideration.

Motion by Council Member Orth, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Matthews, to approve the Consent Calendar, except items 3-4 and 3-5.

Ayes: Matthews, Orth, Gornick, Lyons

Absent: Chaney
3-4 Approval – Appointment of Lemoore Planning Commissioners 7 Motion by Council Member Gornick, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Matthews, to approve the Appointment of Lemoore Planning Commissioners.

Ayes: Gornick, Matthews, Orth, Lyons

Absent: Chaney
3-5 Approval – Appointment of ARPA Ad Hoc Committee Members Motion by Council Member Orth, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Matthews, to approve the Appointment of ARPA Ad Hoc Committee Members.

Ayes: Orth, Matthews, Gornick, Lyons

Absent: Chaney
PUBLIC HEARINGS – Section 4
No Public Hearings.

NEW BUSINESS – Section 5
5-1 Report and Recommendation – Additional Position and Revision of Existing Positions in Support of Succession Planning for the Public Works Department (Speer) Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Matthews, seconded by Council Member Orth, to approve the Additional Position and Revision of Existing Positions in Support of Succession planning for the Public Works Department.

Ayes: Matthews, Orth, Lyons
Noes: Gornick

Absent: Chaney
5-2 Report and Recommendation – Agreement and Budget Amendment – HR Dynamics & Performance Management, Inc. (Olson)
Motion by Council Member Orth, seconded by Council Member Gornick, to approve the Agreement and Budget Amendment for HR Dynamics & Performance Management, Inc.

Ayes: Orth, Gornick, Matthews, Lyons

Absent: Chaney
5-3 Information Only – Kings County Association of Governments (Avalos) Kendall Flint with DKS Associates provided a brief presentation on the work being performed with KCAG on the outreach program for the current Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy.

BRIEF CITY COUNCIL REPORTS AND REQUESTS – Section 6
6-1 City Council Reports / Requests
Council Member Orth thanked all City staff for all the hard work they do to keep the City safe. He requested an update from the PD in regards to the camera system. He asked everyone to stay safe.
8 Council Member Gornick thanked everyone for the productive meetings. He stated that his thoughts and prayers are with Council Member Chaney. He hopes everything is okay.

Mayor Pro Tem Matthews thanked City staff, Police and Fire for all they do. Reminded everyone that the Blood Drive is January 19th between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. at the PD.

Mayor Lyons thanked Mrs. Champion for driving the meeting. Thanked all those who attended the meeting virtually and made comments. He also thanked those who applied to the Planning Commission and Ad Hoc Committee.

ADJOURNMENT
At 8:04 p.m., Council adjourned.

Approved the 1st day of February 2022.

APPROVED:

Stuart Lyons, Mayor
ATTEST:

Marisa Avalos, City Clerk
9 City of

LEMOORE

CALIFORNIA
711 W. Cinnamon Drive  Lemoore, California 93245  (559) 924-6744 Staff Report
Item No: 3-2
To: Lemoore City Council
From: Nathan Olson, City Manager
Date: January 21, 2022 Meeting Date: February 1, 2022
Subject: Resolution 2022-03 – Authorizing Continued Use of Remote Teleconferencing Provisions (AB 361)
Strategic Initiative:
☐ Safe & Vibrant Community ☐ Growing & Dynamic Economy
☐ Fiscally Sound Government ☐ Operational Excellence
☐ Community & Neighborhood Livability ☐ Not Applicable
Proposed Motion:

Approve Resolution 2022-03, Authorizing the City Manager to Continue with Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.

Subject/Discussion:

On September 16, 2021, the California legislature passed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 361, which amends Government Code, section 54953 and permits a local agency to use teleconferencing to conduct its meetings in any of the following circumstances: (A) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; (B) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or (C) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B), that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

In order for the City Council to use teleconferencing as allowed by AB 361 after October 1, 2021, it must first adopt findings in a resolution, allowing the City Council to conduct teleconferenced meetings for a period of thirty (30) days. The City Council made such findings on September 30, 2021. In addition, AB 361 requires the City make specified findings every 30 days thereafter. Such additional findings were made by the City Council on October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 14, 2021, and January 4, 2022. 10 Financial Consideration(s):

No substantial costs noted.

Alternatives or Pros/Cons:

Do not continue with virtual meetings.

Commission/Board Recommendation:

Not Applicable
Staff Recommendation:

Staff recommends City Council approve Resolution 2022-03, Authorizing the City Manager to Continue with Teleconferenced Public Meetings Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361.

Attachments: Review: Date:
☒ Resolution: 2022-03 ☒ Asst. City Manager 01/26/2022
☐ Ordinance: ☒ City Attorney 01/28/2022
☐ Map ☒ City Clerk 01/28/2022
☐ Contract ☐ City Manager
☐ Other ☒ Finance 01/26/2022
List:

11 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEMOORE AUTHORIZING CONTINUED USE OF REMOTE TELECONFERENCING PROVISIONS (AB 361) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lemoore (“City Council”) is committed to open and transparent government, and full compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (“Brown Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Brown Act generally requires that a public agency take certain actions in order to use teleconferencing to attend a public meeting virtually; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that a local emergency persists due to the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has recognized the ongoing state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic and has responded by creating an additional means for public meetings to be held via teleconference (inclusive of internet-based virtual meetings); and WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, the California legislature passed Assembly Bill (“AB”) 361, which amends Government Code, section 54953 and permits a local agency to use teleconferencing to conduct its meetings in any of the following circumstances: (A) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency, and state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing; (B) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency for the purpose of determining, by majority vote, whether as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; or (C) the legislative body holds a meeting during a proclaimed state of emergency and has determined, by majority vote, pursuant to subparagraph (B), that, as a result of the emergency, meeting in person would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, in order for the City Council to use teleconferencing as allowed by AB 361 after October 1, 2021, it must first adopt findings in a resolution, allowing the City Council to conduct teleconferenced meetings for a period of thirty (30) days. Such adoption occurred by the City Council on September 30, 2021; and
WHEREAS, AB 361 requires the City make specified findings every 30 days thereafter; and
WHEREAS, such additional findings were made by the City Council on October 19, 2021, November 16, 2021, December 14 2021 and January 4, 2022, with the approval of Resolutions No. 2021- 26, 2021-28, 2021-32 and 2022-02; and
WHEREAS, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a state of emergency for the State of California due to the COVID-19 pandemic in his order entitled “Proclamation of a State of Emergency,” signed March 4, 2020; and/or
12 WHEREAS, the California Occupational and Safety Health Administration (OSHA) continues to recommend certain social distancing requirements, as described in detail in California Code of Regulations Title 8, section 3205 Covid Prevention; and/or WHEREAS, the County of Kings recommends social distancing and stated that “As with any virus, especially during the flue season, there are a number of steps you can take to protect your health and those around you…practice social distancing of at least six feet if it is necessary to leave your home;
WHEREAS, the County of Kings Department of Public Health in its August 28, 2021 press release urged “…everyone to physical distance themselves from others…” and further recommends as a “very effective” step that people can take: “Stay in your home as much as possible. The only exceptions should be for getting food and/or necessary household supplies, medications and medical treatments.”
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the state and local emergencies have caused and will continue to cause imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the City Council is conducting its meetings through the use of telephonic and internet-based services so that members of the public may observe and participate in meetings and offer public comment.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and fully incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council is conducting meetings during a state of emergency and OSHA recommends measures to promote social distancing; and/or BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council has determined that given the state of emergency, holding in-person only meetings would present imminent risks to the health or safety of attendees.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the actions taken by the City Council through this resolution shall be applied to all City committees governed by the Brown Act unless otherwise desired by that committee.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council authorizes the City Manager or their designee(s) to take all actions necessary to continue to conduct City Council meetings in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) and all other applicable provisions of the Brown Act, using teleconferencing for a period of thirty (30) days from the adoption of this Resolution after which the City Council will again reconsider the circumstances of the state of emergency.
13 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Lemoore City Council on this 1st day of February 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ _________________________
Marisa Avalos Stuart Lyons
City Clerk Mayor
14 City of

LEMOORE

CALIFORNIA
711 W. Cinnamon Drive  Lemoore, California 93245  (559) 924-6744 Staff Report
Item No: 4-1
To: Lemoore City Council
From: Steve Brandt, City Planner
Date: January 21, 2022 Meeting Date: February 1, 2022
Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05: a request by Daley Homes to change a portion of the land use designation on the Lemoore General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map from Low Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential and a portion of the land use designation and Zoning Map from Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) to Low Density Residential (RLD) on the undeveloped site located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 remainder).

Strategic Initiative:
☐ Safe & Vibrant Community ☒ Growing & Dynamic Economy
☐ Fiscally Sound Government ☐ Operational Excellence
☒ Community & Neighborhood Livability ☐ Not Applicable
Proposed Motion:

City staff recommends that the City Council take one of the following actions:
a) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-04 denying General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05, or
b) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-05 approving General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-01 (first reading) approving Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05.

Project Proposal:
15 This proposal is a request for a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change a portion of the undeveloped 7.09-acre site from Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) to Low Density Residential (RLD) and to change a portion of the site currently zoned Low Density Residential (RLD) to Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD).The site is located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 remainder) The new general plan designation and zoning can accommodate up to approximately 53 residential units. The current general plan designation and zoning could accommodate up to approximately 23 residential units, so approval of the general plan amendment and zoning map amendment would result in a net increase of 30 residential units on the site.

At this time, no site plan or tentative subdivision map are being proposed. They will be proposed at a later date for review by the Planning Commission.

Roughly three-quarters of the site would be designated and zoned Low-Medium Density Residential and likely consist of duplex and triplex housing units similar to the units Daley Homes has previously constructed along Sonoma Avenue to the northwest of the site.

The remaining future lots to the north would remain zoned Low Density Residential and would consist of single-family homes similar to the units Daley Homes has constructed in the existing subdivision to the north of the site. See the attached exhibits for the portion of the site that would be changed to Low-Medium Density Residential.

Previous Relevant Actions:

Prior to the 2008 comprehensive General Plan Update, the site was zoned similar to the applicant’s proposal. The land was owned by Daley Homes at that time. As part of the General Plan Update process in 2008, Caltrans determined that the property would be needed in the future to improve the movements from westbound SR 198 to southbound SR 41, and westbound SR 198 to northbound SR 41. The preliminary design at the time called for a flyover structure for traffic moving from westbound SR 198 to southbound SR

41. Because of Caltrans’ stated need, the site was not given a land use designation in the 2008 General Plan Update and was not zoned in the 2012 Zoning Ordinance.

In 2016, Daley Homes requested the reestablishment of the Low Density Residential and Low-Medium Density Residential land use designations on the proposed undeveloped site. Caltrans stated they were not willing to purchase the site. The Planning Commission recommended, and the City Council approved a modified version of the request and designated the entire site Low Density Residential (RLD).

During the 2016 land use designation and zone assignment process, adjacent property owners to the north expressed concerns about the Low Medium Density land use designation proposed on the north portion of the site. As a result, the City Council in 2016 designated and zoned the entire site Low Density Residential. The request now would not change the portion of the Low Density Residential designation and zoning that is adjacent to those property owners. It would remain Low Density Residential. The change would occur next to the future highway block wall.

Timeline of Zoning of the Site:

Before 2008: Zoned Low Medium Density Residential
16 2008 to 2016: Zoning removed in 2008. No zoning.
2016 to 2022: Rezoned to Low Density Residential in 2016.

Requested today: A mix of Low Density and Low Medium Density Residential Evaluation:

The proposal would allow for a mix of single-family and multi-family housing on the site.

City Staff had recommended approval to encourage a greater mix of housing and to bring the zoning back to what it was prior to 2008. The Planning Commission has recommended against the applicant’s request, agreeing with neighbors who testified that the additional housing units would create land use compatibility conflicts and increase traffic.

If the request is denied, the entire area would remain designated and zoned Low Density Residential (RLD). This would mean that instead of a mix of single-family homes and multi-family housing, only single-family and two-family homes would be allowed. There are two resolutions attached, one that would approve the general plan amendment and one that would deny it. If the Council chooses to approve the general plan and ordinance reflect the Planning Commission’s recommendation. If the Council follows the Planning Commission’s recommendation, only single-family and duplex units could be built on the site, and there would be fewer housing units.

General plan amendments and zone changes do not typically include conditions of approval. Those conditions would occur with the site plan and tentative subdivision map are approved. When this occurs, there will be conditions for a block sound wall to be constructed similar to the existing walls north and east of the project. There will likely be other conditions as well that will be proposed by Staff and reviewed by the Planning Commission when the subdivision and site plan are proposed.

State Housing Law Assessment:

Pursuant to the Housing Crisis Act (Government Code section 66300), affected cities may not take any actions, such as general plan designation and zoning of a site, that would result in “a less intensive use or reduc[e] the intensity of land use.” Essentially, a site cannot be “downzoned” to “reduce the site’s residential development capacity.” However, a site may be “downzoned” if the city concurrently “upzones” other parcels “to ensure that there is no net loss in residential capacity.” If requested by an applicant, the city has 180 days to “upzone” another parcel(s).

The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment primarily result in increasing the residential capacity on the site, from approximately 23 residential units to approximately 53 residential units, resulting in a net increase of 30 residential units on the site. As such, the City has complied with Government Code section 66300. Further, the increased residential capacity may be available to offset any decrease in residential capacity resulting from future projects. If the project is approved, City staff recommend that the City make findings to that effect.

Environmental Assessment:
17 As Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City staff reviewed the project to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment because of its development. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, “[s]ignificant effect on the environment” means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance.

An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared in May 2017 at the time the site was originally designated. The Initial Study found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project in the form of mitigations have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the City and is attached for review.

City staff have evaluated the proposed land use and zoning designations pursuant to CEQA Guidelines and in light of the adopted IS/MND. Staff have determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND. Further, staff have determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will not involve new significant environmental effects or increase the severity of previously identified environmental effects. Therefore, the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA.

Findings:

If the Council chooses to approve the amendments as presented, then Staff recommends making the following findings for the project:

1. The general plan amendment is in the public interest and the General Plan, as amended, will remain internally consistent.

2. The zoning map amendment is consistent with the general plan goals, policies, and implementation programs.

3. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA.

If the Council chooses to deny, then Staff recommends that the Council makes the following findings for denial of the project:
18 1. The proposed general plan amendment and zoning map amendment are not in the public interest.

2. The proposal will increase traffic on adjacent and surrounding local roadways.

3. The proposal would result in land use patterns not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood.

Financial Consideration(s):

The proposed General Plan and Zoning Amendments will not have a financial effect on the City of Lemoore.

Alternatives or Pros/Cons:

The City Council has the option of either approving or denying General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05. Since the Planning Commission recommended denial in their meeting on January 11, 2022, staff has provided two resolutions to choose from: one for approval and one for denial. If the Council wants to approve the project, the included ordinance will also need to be introduced.

Commission/Board Recommendation:

The Planning Commission reviewed the project at their January 11, 2022, meeting. The Commission voted 4-0 (2 absent, 1 vacancy) to recommend denial of the amendments, finding that they should be denied based on traffic circulation and land use compatibility concerns with the site. The applicant and two neighbors spoke at the public hearing.

In response to the Commission’s concerns, the applicant prepared a trip generation letter to compare the vehicle trips of the proposal with vehicle trips from what is allowed right now. This was information that was not presented to the Planning Commission. The letter is attached.

Staff Recommendation:

In its report to the Planning Commission, Staff had originally recommended approval of the amendments based on depth of lots, the adjacency of the site to the freeway, and the historical zoning of the site prior to 2008.

Attachments: Review: Date:
☒ Resolutions: 2022-04 and 2022-05 ☒ Asst. City Manager 01/26/2022 ☒ Ordinance: 2022-01 ☒ City Attorney 01/28/2022
☐ Map ☐ City Manager
☐ Contract ☒ City Clerk 01/28/2022
☒ Other ☒ Finance 01/26/2022
List: Project Site Map
Map of Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations Conceptual Site Plan
Proposed Zoning on Conceptual Site Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration, adopted in 2017
Draft Notice of Exemption
19 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEMOORE DENYING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2021-05
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STATE ROUTE 198 AND STATE ROUTE 41,

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lemoore makes the following findings, based on facts detailed in the February 1, 2022, staff report and other documents found in the administrative record, which is hereby incorporated by reference, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the Public Hearing:

1. The proposed general plan amendment and zoning map amendment are not in the public interest.

2. The proposal will increase traffic on adjacent and surrounding local roadways.

3. The proposal would result in land use patterns not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lemoore hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03 and Zone Change No. 2021-05. 20 Passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lemoore held on February 1, 2022, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ _________________________
Marisa Avalos Stuart Lyons
City Clerk Mayor
21 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEMOORE APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2021-03
LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STATE ROUTE 198 AND STATE ROUTE 41,

SOUTH OF SAN SIMEON DRIVE AND WEST OF ARCATA AVENUE
WHEREAS, Daley Homes has requested approval of a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment for the parcel located at the site that is located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 remainder); and
WHEREAS, the proposed undeveloped site is 7.09 acres in size, and is currently designated and zoned Low Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, the project proposes a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment to change the Lemoore General Plan Land Use Map and Zoning Map on a portion of the site from Low Density Residential to Low-Medium Density Residential and a portion of the site from Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) to Low Density Residential (RLD); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared in May 2017 at the time the site was originally designated, and staff have determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND, will not involve new significant environmental effects or increase the severity of previously identified environmental effects, and therefore, will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Lemoore Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at its January 11, 2022, meeting, and recommended denial of the project to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Lemoore City Council held a duly noticed public hearing at its February 1, 2022, meeting.

1. The general plan amendment is in the public interest and the General Plan, as amended, will remain internally consistent.

2. The zoning map amendment is consistent with the general plan goals, policies, and implementation programs.

3. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA. 22 4. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment comply with Government Code section 66300 by increasing residential capacity by up to 30 residential units and the City may rely on this increased capacity for future projects to ensure no net loss in residential capacity.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lemoore hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03, as depicted in Attachment A.

Passed and adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lemoore held on February 1, 2022, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ _________________________
Marisa Avalos Stuart Lyons
City Clerk Mayor
23 24
Attachment A
25 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEMOORE APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. 2021-05, CHANGING A PORTION OF THE ZONING MAP FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RLD) TO LOWMEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RLMD) AND A PORTION OF THE ZONING

MAP FROM LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RLMD) TO LOW DENSITY

RESIDENTIAL (RLD) LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF STATE ROUTE 198 AND STATE ROUTE 41, SOUTH OF SAN SIMEON DRIVE AND WEST

OF ARCATA AVENUE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LEMOORE HEREBY DOES ORDAIN:

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
(a) The property owner Daley Homes, located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 remainder), has requested Zoning Map Amendment No. 2022-05. (b) This zoning map amendment is consistent with the City of Lemoore General Plan, Lemoore Municipal Code, and the Zoning Ordinance and would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City. (c) An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared in May 2017 at the time the site was originally designated, and staff have determined that the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND, will not involve new significant environmental effects or increase the severity of previously identified environmental effects, and therefore, will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA.

SECTION 2. The property located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 remainder) is hereby zoned Low Medium Density Residential (RLMD) and Low Density Residential (RLD), as depicted in the map attached hereto as Attachment A.

SECTION 3. The official Zoning Map shall be amended to reflect this change. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
26 The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Lemoore held on the 1st day of February 2022, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 15th day of February, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_________________________ _________________________
Marisa Avalos Stuart Lyons
City Clerk Mayor
27 Project Site Map
28 Map of Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Designations To Low-Medium
Density Residential
To Low Density
Residential
29 561 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 13 9 10 11 12 42 41 40 39 15 14 13 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 789 ARCATA AVE. 134.41' 141.51' 115.98' 104.24' 103.10' 97.73' 97.67' 118.84' 127.14' 127.14' 133.21' 133.21'

80.23' 91.53' 72.59' 72.59' 72.59' 72.21' 72.20' 65.30' 70.64'

74.80' 80.86' 80.90' 30' 30' 21 S A V A N N A H 1,581 AUBURN 1,581 S A V A N N A H PHOENIX AUBURN AUBURN S A V A N N A H 1,581 PHOENIX 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 22 2 2 33 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 14 15 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 SONOMA AVE.

STATE HIGHWAY 41
STATE HIGHWAY 198 2 2 2 2 2 2 10' MIN. 24.0' TYP. 5.0' TYP. 5.0' TYP. 15.0' TYP. 10.0' TYP. 5.0' TYP. 5.0' TYP. SEPTEMBER 2021 SILVA ESTATES 11 PHASE 3 SITE PLAN PREPARED BY: FAX: 559.802.3215 TEL: 559.802.3052 VISALIA, CA 93292 324 S. SANTA FE, STE. A P.O. BOX 7593 VICINITY MAP STATE HWY 41 APN: 023-320-02 TRACT: 793 ZONE: R-1-7 TOTAL SITE AREA: 7.09 AC EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE: MULTI-FAMILY & SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION WATER SEWER: CITY OF LEMOORE STORM DRAIN: CITY OF LEMOORE SOLID WASTE: CITY OF LEMOORE GAS: THE GAS COMPANY POWER: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. MULTI FAMILY LOTS: 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS: 8 UNITS: 53 TOTAL, 8 SF, 45 MF TOTAL NO. OF LOTS: 23 SILVA 11 LANDSCAPING LOTS: 23 TOTAL SITE AREA 308,840 SQ FT. MULTI FAMILY TOTAL SITE AREA 229,184 SQ FT. SITE COVERAGE: BUILDINGS 69,161 SQ FT. HARDSCAPE 8,558 SQ FT. TOTAL OPEN AREA 139,268 SQ F. LANDSCAPE AREA 130,710 SQ FT. LANDSCAPE % OF OPEN AREA 94 % LANDSCAPE OF SITE AREA 57 % LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, T. 19 S., R 20 E., M.D.B. & M., IN THE CITY OF LEMOORE, COUNTY OF KINGS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

NORTH 40' 0' 40' 1" = 2 MILES STATE HWY 198
SILVA ESTATE UNIT 9 SILVA ESTATE 11 SILVA ESTATE UNIT 4 SILVA ESTATE UNIT 11 PHASE 2 SILVA ESTATE UNIT 7 SILVA ESTATE UNIT 1

SILVA ESTATE
UNIT 2
SILVA ESTATE UNIT 3

SILVA ESTATE
UNIT 5

SILVA ESTATE
UNIT 6
19TH AVE. SILVERADO DRIVE SILVA ESTATE UNIT 11 PHASE 1 PHASE 3 EXTENT OF CURRENT DEVELOPMENT (TYP. PROJECT BOUNDARY (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PREVIOUS CALTRANS RIGHT OF WAY, NOT BEING PROPOSED ANY LONGER BLOCK WALL STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT 30 6
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 42 13 16 17 18 19 20 22 2360 15 21 23 24 9 8
5 6
7 STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT STREET LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT 6 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 42 4125 13 16 17 18 19 20 22 236160 15 21 23 24 9 8
5 6
7 STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT STREET LIGHT FIRE HYDRANT FIRE HYDRANT 324 S.SANTA FE, STE.A
VISALIA, CA 93292
(559) 802-3052

ZONE CHANGE TRACT- XXX
07/09/2021 SILVA ESTATES-11-PH-3
NORTH
150' 0' 150' LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY

CURRENT PROPOSED

LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

LOW DENSITY SINGLE-FAMILY

LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
31 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

CITY OF LEMOORE
Daley Homes General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
May 2017
Contact:

Judy Holwell
(559) 924-6740
[email protected]
711 W. Cinnamon Drive
Lemoore, CA 93245
Comments must be received by: June 12, 2017 (20 days after notice) 32 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
City of Lemoore
Prepared for:

City of Lemoore
711 W Cinnamon Drive
Lemoore, CA 93245
Contact Person: Judy Holwell, Development Services Director Phone: 559) 924-6740
Consultant:
901 East Main Street
Visalia, CA 93292
Contact: Steve Brandt, City Planner
Phone: (559) 733-0440
Fax: (559) 733-7821
December 2021
© Copyright by Quad Knopf, Inc.

Unauthorized use prohibited.

Project #L16002.02
33 Table of Contents
Mitigated Negative Declaration ........................................................................................................................ 1 Project Name........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description............................................................................................................................................... 1 Mailing Address and Phone Number of Contact Person........................................................................ 1 Findings .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Mitigation Measures Included in the Project to Avoid Potentially Significant Effects............... 2 SECTION 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9

1.1 - Overview ........................................................................................................................................................ 9

1.2 - CEQA Requirements................................................................................................................................... 9

1.3 - Impact Terminology................................................................................................................................... 9

1.4 - Document Organization and Contents............................................................................................. 10 SECTION 2 - Project Description ................................................................................................................... 11

2.1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 11

2.2 - Project Location........................................................................................................................................ 11

2.3 - Surrounding Land Uses ......................................................................................................................... 11

2.4 - Proposed Project...................................................................................................................................... 11 SECTION 3 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ............................................................................... 16

3.1 - Environmental Checklist and Discussion ....................................................................................... 16

3.2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:................................................................................ 18

3.3 - Determination ........................................................................................................................................... 18

3.4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ............................................................................................. 20

3.5 - Aesthetics .................................................................................................................................................... 22

3.6 - Agriculture and Forestry Resources................................................................................................. 24

3.7 - Air Quality................................................................................................................................................... 25

3.8 - Biological Resources ............................................................................................................................... 28

3.9 - Cultural Resources................................................................................................................................... 42

3.10 - Geology and Soils................................................................................................................................... 45

3.11 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................................ 48

3.12 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials.................................................................................................. 49

3.13 - Hydrology and Water Quality........................................................................................................... 52

3.14 - Land Use and Planning........................................................................................................................ 57

3.15 - Mineral Resources................................................................................................................................. 58

3.16 - Noise........................................................................................................................................................... 59

3.17 - Population and Housing...................................................................................................................... 61

3.18 - Public Services........................................................................................................................................ 62 34 3.19 - Recreation ................................................................................................................................................ 65

3.20 - Transportation and Traffic ................................................................................................................ 66

3.21 - Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................................................... 69

3.22 - Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................................ 70

3.23 - Mandatory Findings of Significance............................................................................................... 72 SECTION 4 - References.................................................................................................................................... 75 List of Figures
Figure 2-1 Project Site...................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 2-2 Regional Location ........................................................................................................................ 13 Figure 2-3 Project Location in City.............................................................................................................. 14 Figure 2-4 Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................................. 15 Figure 3-1 CNDDB Special-Status Birds .................................................................................................... 36 Figure 3-2 CNDDB Special-Status Invertebrates, Fish, Amphibians and Reptiles.................... 37 Figure 3-3 CNDDB Special-Status Mammals ........................................................................................... 38 Figure 3-4 CNDDB Sensitive Natural Communities and Special-Status Plant Species............ 39 Figure 3-5 USFWS Critical Habitat.............................................................................................................. 40 Figure 3-6 National Wetland Inventory and Hydrologic Information .......................................... 41 Figure 3-1 Soil Map ........................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 3-8 FEMA Map....................................................................................................................................... 56 List of Tables
Table 3-1 SPAL Thresholds – Single Family ........................................................................................... 26

List of Appendices
Appendix A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Appendix B CalEEMod Results

35 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
As Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Lemoore reviewed the Project described below to determine whether it could have a significant effect on the environment because of its development. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15382, “[s]ignificant effect on the environment” means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance.

Project Name
Daley Homes General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
Project Location
The Project site is located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue (APN 023-320-005).

Project Description
A request by Daley Homes to reestablish the Low Density Residential and Low Medium Density Residential land use designation on the proposed undesignated site, and reestablish the Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) and the Low Density Residential (RLD) zones on the proposed unzone site. The reestablishment of the general plan designation and zoning would accommodate up to approximately 134 residential units.

Mailing Address and Phone Number of Contact Person
Scott Daley
Vice President
Daley Homes
1356 E. Tulare Ave.

Tulare, CA 93274
(559) 686-1761
Findings
As Lead Agency, the City of Lemoore finds that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Checklist (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G) or Initial Study (IS) (see Section 3 - Environmental Checklist) identified one or more potentially significant effects on the environment, but revisions to the Project have been made before the release of this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or mitigation measures would be implemented that reduce all potentially significant impacts less-than-significant levels. The Lead Agency further finds that there is no substantial evidence that this Project would have a significant effect on the environment.
36 Mitigation Measures Included in the Project to Avoid Potentially Significant Effects
MM 3.8.1: A qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey on the Project site and within 500 feet of its perimeter within 14 days of and no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction activities.

If any evidence of occupation of the Project site by listed or other special-status species is subsequently observed, a buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist that results in sufficient avoidance to comply with applicable regulations. If sufficient avoidance cannot be established, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game shall be contacted for further guidance and consultation on additional measures.

The Project proponent shall obtain any required permits from the appropriate wildlife agency. Copies of all permits and evidence of compliance with applicable regulations shall be submitted to the lead agency.

The following buffer distances shall be established prior to construction activities:
• San Joaquin kit fox or American badger potential den: 50 feet; • San Joaquin kit fox known den: 100 feet;
• San Joaquin kit fox or American badger pupping den: contact the California Department of Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife Service; • Burrowing owl burrow outside of breeding season: 160 feet; • Burrowing owl burrow during breeding season: 250 feet; • Swainson’s hawk nest during breeding season: ½ mile;
• Other protected raptor nests during the breeding season: 300 feet; • Other protected nesting migratory bird nests during the breeding season: 50 feet; and • Other special-status wildlife species: as recommended by qualified biologist.

MM 3.8.2: If initial grading activities are planned during the potential nesting season for migratory birds/raptors that may nest on or near the Project site, the preconstruction survey shall evaluate the sites and accessible lands within an adequate buffer for active nests of migratory birds/raptors. If any nesting birds/raptors are observed, a qualified biologist shall determine buffer distances and/or the timing of Project activities so that the proposed Project does not cause nest abandonment or destruction of eggs or young. This measure shall be implemented so that the proposed Project remains in compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and applicable state regulations.
37 If nesting raptors are identified during the surveys, active raptor nests should be avoided by 500 feet and all other migratory bird nests should be avoided by 250 feet. Avoidance buffers may be reduced if a qualified and approved on-site monitor determines that encroachment into the buffer area is not affecting nest building, the rearing of young, or otherwise affect the breeding behaviors of the resident birds. Avoidance buffers can also be reduced through consultation with the CDFW and USFWS. If Swainson's hawks are found to nest within the survey area, active Swainson’s hawk nests shall be avoided by 0.5 mile unless this avoidance buffer is reduced through consultation with the CDFW and/or USFWS.

No construction or earth-moving activity shall occur within a non-disturbance buffer until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have fledged (that is, left the nest) and have attained sufficient flight skills to avoid Project construction areas. This typically occurs by early July, but September 1st is considered the end of the nesting period unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Once raptors have completed nesting and young have fledged, disturbance buffers will no longer be needed and can be removed, and monitoring can be terminated.

MM 3.8.3: If any burrowing owl burrows are observed during the preconstruction survey, avoidance measures shall be consistent and in accordance with protocols outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). Active burrows shall be avoided, but if avoidance is not possible then compensation shall be provided for the active or passive displacement of western burrowing owls, and habitat acquisition and the creation of artificial dens for any western burrowing owls shall be provided for any owls relocated from construction areas. These measures are outlined as follows:

1. A pre-construction survey of construction area, including a 150-meter buffer (500 feet), shall be conducted no less than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to ground disturbing activities. If more than 30 days lapse between the time of the pre-construction survey and the start of ground-disturbing activities, another pre-construction survey shall be completed. The second survey (or other subsequent surveys if necessary) shall be conducted and timed to occur sometime between 30 days and 24 hours prior to ground disturbance.

2. If western burrowing owls are present on the construction site (or within 500 feet of the construction site), exclusion fencing shall be installed between the nest site or active burrow and any earth-moving activity or other disturbance. Exclusion areas shall extend 160 feet around occupied burrows during the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31) and extend 250 feet around occupied burrows during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31) as described in The California Burrowing Owl Consortium’s Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (California Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993).

3. If western burrowing owls are present in the non-breeding season and must be passively relocated from the Project site, passive relocation shall not commence until October 1st and must be completed by February 1st. Passive relocation must only be conducted by a 38 qualified biologist or ornithologist and with approval by CDFW. After passive relocation, the area where owls occurred and its immediate vicinity shall be monitored by a qualified biologist daily for one week and once per week for an additional two weeks to document that owls are not reoccupying the site.

4. If permanent impacts to nesting, occupied and satellite burrows, or burrowing owl habitat occur, compensation shall be based upon the number of owls or pairs of owls relocated from the construction area. Compensation acreage shall be determined as described in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012).

MM 3.8.4: The measures listed below shall be implemented during construction:

1. Pre-construction surveys shall be conducted no fewer than 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities. If any San Joaquin kit fox dens are found during preconstruction surveys, exclusion zones shall be placed in accordance with USFWS Recommendations using the following:

San Joaquin kit fox USFWS Exclusion Zone Recommendations Den Type Recommendation
Potential Den 50-foot radius
Known Den 100-foot radius
Natal/Pupping Den
(Occupied and Unoccupied)
Contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for guidance
Atypical Den 50-foot radius

2. If any den must be removed, it must be appropriately monitored and excavated by a trained wildlife biologist. Destruction of natal dens and other “known” kit fox dens must not occur until authorized by USFWS. Replacement dens will be required if such dens are removed. Potential dens that are removed do not need to be replaced if they are determined to be inactive by using standard monitoring techniques (e.g., applying tracking medium around the den opening and monitoring for San Joaquin kit fox tracks for three consecutive nights).

3. Project-related vehicles shall observe a daytime speed limit of 20-mph throughout the site in all Project areas, except on County roads and State and federal highways; this is particularly important at night when kit foxes and badgers are most active. Night-time construction shall be minimized to the extent possible. However, if construction at night does occur, then the speed limit shall be reduced to 10-mph. Off-road traffic outside of designated Project areas shall be prohibited.

4. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of a Project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than 2-feet deep should be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials. If the trenches cannot be closed, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen-fill or 39 wooden planks shall be installed. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the USFWS and the CDFW shall be contacted at the addresses provided below.

5. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipes and become trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of 4-inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the USFWS has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.

6. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps shall be disposed of in securely closed containers and removed at least once a week from a construction or Project sites.

7. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens.

8. Use of rodenticides and herbicides in Project areas shall be restricted. This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional Project-related restrictions deemed necessary by the USFWS. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of a proven lower risk to kit fox.

9. A representative shall be appointed by the Project proponent who will be the contact source for any employee or contractor who might inadvertently kill or injure a kit fox or who finds a dead, injured or entrapped kit fox. The representative will be identified during the employee education program and their name and telephone number shall be provided to the USFWS.

10. An employee education program shall be conducted. The program shall consist of a brief presentation by persons knowledgeable in San Joaquin kit fox biology and legislative protection to explain endangered species concerns to contractors, their employees, and military and/or agency personnel involved in the Project. The program shall include: a description of the San Joaquin kit fox and its habitat needs; a report of the occurrence of kit fox in the Project area; an explanation of the status of the species and its protection under the Endangered Species Act; and a list of measures being taken to reduce impacts to the species during Project construction and implementation. A fact sheet conveying 40 this information shall be prepared for distribution to the previously referenced people and anyone else who may enter the Project sites.

11. Upon completion of the Project, all areas subject to temporary ground disturbances, including storage and staging areas, temporary roads, pipeline corridors, etc. shall be recontoured if necessary, and revegetated to promote restoration of the area to pre-Project conditions. An area subject to "temporary" disturbance means any area that is disturbed during the Project, but after Project completion will not be subject to further disturbance and has the potential to be revegetated. Appropriate methods and plant species used to revegetate such areas should be determined on a site-specific basis in consultation with the USFWS, CDFW, and revegetation experts.

12. In the case of trapped animals, escape ramps or structures should be installed immediately to allow the animal(s) to escape, or the USFWS shall be contacted for guidance.

13. Any contractor, employee, or military or agency personnel who are responsible for inadvertently killing or injuring a San Joaquin kit fox shall immediately report the incident to their representative. This representative shall contact the CDFW immediately in the case of a dead, injured or entrapped kit fox. The CDFW contact for immediate assistance is State Dispatch at (916)445-0045. They will contact the local warden or CDFW representative, the wildlife biologist, at (530)934-9309. The USFWS shall be contacted at the numbers below.

14. The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office of USFWS and CDFW shall be notified in writing within three working days of the accidental death or injury to a San Joaquin kit fox during Project-related activities. Notification must include the date, time, and location of the incident or of the finding of a dead or injured animal and any other pertinent information.

The USFWS contact is the Chief of the Division of Endangered Species, at the addresses and telephone numbers below. The CDFW contact can be reached at 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A, Rancho Cordova, California 95670, (530) 934-9309.

15. All sightings of the San Joaquin kit fox shall be reported to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). A copy of the reporting form and a topographic map clearly marked with the location of where the kit fox was observed shall also be provided to the Service at the address below.

Any Project-related information required by the USFWS or questions concerning the above conditions or their implementation may be directed in writing to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at: Endangered Species Division, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Sacramento, California 95825-1846, phone (916) 414-6620 or (916) 414-6600.

MM 3.9.1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural or archaeological materials are encountered during construction activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find 41 and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants. If the qualified professional archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If a potentially-eligible resource is encountered, then the qualified professional archaeologist, the Lead Agency, and the Project proponent shall arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, total data recovery. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the Lead Agency as verification that the provisions for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met.

MM 3.9.2: During any ground disturbance activities, if paleontological resources are encountered, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified paleontologist as defined by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources (2010), can evaluate the find and make recommendations regarding treatment. Paleontological resource materials may include resources such as fossils, plant impressions, or animal tracks preserved in rock. The qualified paleontologist shall contact the University of California Museum of Paleontology, or other appropriate facility regarding any discoveries of paleontological resources.

If the qualified paleontologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant paleontological resource, additional investigations and fossil recovery may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. If avoidance is not feasible, the paleontological resources shall be evaluated for their significance. If the resources are not significant, avoidance is not necessary. If the resources are significant, they shall be avoided to ensure no adverse effects, or such effects must be mitigated. Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource appropriate measures are recommended or the materials are determined to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

MM 3.9.3: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of 42 the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide any potential Native American involvement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

MM 3.12.1: Prior to ground-disturbing activities, the City shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that specifies best management practices (BMP), with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving offsite. The SWPPP shall include contain a site map that shows the construction site perimeter, existing and proposed man-made facilities, stormwater collection and discharge points, general topography both before and after construction, and drainage patterns across the Project site.

Additionally, the SWPPP shall contain a visual monitoring program and a chemical monitoring program for non-visible pollutants to be implemented (if there is a failure of best management practices). The requirements of the SWPPP and BMPs shall be incorporated into design specifications and construction contracts. Recommended best management practices for the construction phase may include the following:
• Stockpiling and disposing of demolition debris, concrete, and soil properly. • Protecting any existing storm drain inlets and stabilizing disturbed areas. • Implementing erosion controls.
• Properly managing construction materials.
• Managing waste, aggressively controlling litter, and implementing sediment controls.
43 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1 - Overview
The Project is the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change of a 20-acre parcel in southern Lemoore to accommodate the development of 134 residential lots.

1.2 - CEQA Requirements
The City of Lemoore is the Lead Agency for this Project pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (Public Resources Code Section 15000 et seq.). The Environmental Checklist (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G) or Initial Study (IS) (see Section 3 – Initial Study) provides analysis that examines the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the Project. Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines requires the Lead Agency to prepare an IS to determine whether a discretionary project will have a significant effect on the environment.

A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is appropriate when an IS has been prepared and a determination can be made that no significant environmental effects will occur because revisions to the Project have been made or mitigation measures will be implemented that reduce all potentially significant impacts to less-than-significant levels. The content of a MND is the same as a Negative Declaration, with the addition of identified mitigation measures and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (see Appendix A – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program).

Based on the IS, the Lead Agency has determined that the environmental review for the proposed application can be completed with a MND.

1.3 - Impact Terminology
The following terminology is used to describe the level of significance of project environmental impacts.
• A finding of “no impact” is appropriate if the analysis concludes that the project would not affect a topic area in any way.
• An impact is considered “less than significant” if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and requires no mitigation. • An impact is considered “less than significant with mitigation incorporated” if the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment with the inclusion of environmental commitments that have been agreed to by the proponent.
• An impact is considered “potentially significant” if the analysis concludes that it could have a substantial adverse effect on the environment.
44 1.4 - Document Organization and Contents
The content and format of this IS/MND is designed to meet the requirements of CEQA. The report contains the following sections:
• Section 1 – Introduction: This section provides an overview of CEQA requirements, intended uses of the IS/MND, document organization, and a list of regulations that have been incorporated by reference.
• Section 2 – Project Description: This section describes the Project and provides data on the site’s location.
• Section 3 – Environmental Checklist: This chapter contains the evaluation of 18 different environmental resource factors contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. Each environmental resource factor is analyzed to determine whether the proposed Project would have an impact. One of four findings is made for each factor, which include: no impact, less-than-significant impact, less than significant with mitigation, or significant and unavoidable. If the evaluation results in a finding of significant and unavoidable for any of the 18 environmental resource factors, then an Environmental Impact Report will be required. • Section 4 – References: This chapter contains a full list of references that were used in the preparation of this IS/MND.
• Appendix A – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program: This appendix contains the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. • Appendix B – CalEEMod Results: This appendix contains the 2005 (base) and 2019 (estimated opening day) readouts from the California Emissions Estimator Model.
45 SECTION 2 - PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 - Introduction
The Project is the General Plan Amendment/Zone Change (GPA/ZC) of a 20-acre parcel in southern Lemoore to accommodate the development of 134 residential lots.

2.2 - Project Location
The site consists of a 20-acre parcel (APN 023-320-005) located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue in south-central Lemoore. The site is in Section 9, Township 19 South, Range 20 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDB&M) within the Lemoore United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle. Figure 2-2 and Figure 2-3 provide a regional vicinity and location map of the Project site, respectively.

2.3 - Surrounding Land Uses
The area surrounding the proposed site consists of a single-family residential to the north, Highway 41 to the west, Highway 198 to the east and the Highway 41 Interchange to the south. Beyond Highway 41 to the west are more single-family residences and beyond Highway 198 to the southeast are a variety of uses including Bennett Farm Supply, Motel 6, Valero gas station, McCann and Sons Truck and Tractor Service and Master Storage. Land uses and development surrounding the subdivision site are depicted on Figure 2-4.

2.4 - Proposed Project
The proposed Project is the development of up to 134 residential lots on a 20-acre parcel in southern Lemoore (Figure 2-1). The City actions required to permit the Project include a GPA/ZC, major site plan review, and a tentative subdivision map. Currently, the site, is a vacant undeveloped lot. The request by Daley Homes is to reestablish the Low Density Residential and Low Medium Density Residential land use designation on the proposed undesignated site, and reestablish the Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) and the Low Density Residential (RLD) zones on the proposed unzoned site. 46 Figure 2-1
Project Site
47 Figure 2-2
Regional Location
48 Figure 2-3
Project Location in City
49 Figure 2-4
Surrounding Land Uses
50 SECTION 3 - EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

3.1 - Environmental Checklist and Discussion

1. Project Title:

Daley Homes General Plan Amendment and Zone Change

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Lemoore
119 Fox Street
Lemoore, CA 93245

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Judy Holwell, Development Services Director
(559) 924-6740

4. Project Location:

The site consists of a 20-acre parcel (APN 023-320-005) located at the northeast corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, south of San Simeon Drive and west of Arcata Avenue in south-central Lemoore.

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Scott Daley, Vice President
Daley Homes
1356 E. Tulare Ave.

Tulare, CA 93274
(559) 686-1761

6. General Plan Designation:

Low Density Residential and Low Medium Density Residential

7. Zoning:

Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD) and Low Density Residential (RLD)

8. Description of Project:

See Section 2.4 – Proposed Project.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

See Section 2.3 – Surrounding Land Uses and Figures 2-4. 51 10. Other Public Agencies Approval Required:

None.

11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, has consultation begun?
Yes, the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Tribe has requested consultation with the City of Lemoore. Letters were sent to the tribe on May 9, 2017, informing them of the Project.

NOTE: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and address potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21083.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Resources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
52 3.2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected:

The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forest
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology / Water
Quality
Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population/Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation/Traffic Utilities / Service
Systems
Findings of
Significance

3.3 - Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (a) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (b) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable 53 standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. /ss May 22, 2017

Judy Holwell, Development Services Director Date
54 3.4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a projectspecific screening analysis).

2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.

3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced).

5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.

Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
55 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.

8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.

9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
56 Response: a) The Project site is located adjacent to the Highway 41 and 198 interchange to the south and single-family residential developments to the north. The City of Lemoore 2030 General Plan states there are currently no buildings or structures listed in the National Register of Historic Places or as California Historic Landmarks. However, there are 37 sites listed as having local historic significance located within the downtown district (City of Lemoore , 2008). There are no local historic resources within the vicinity of the Project site.

The Project is not located in an area that would result in substantial adverse effects on any scenic vistas and no impact would occur.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: b), c) There are no listed State scenic highways within Kings County; therefore, the site would not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway (Caltrans, 2017).

As discussed, the proposed development is consistent with the existing character and uses of the surrounding area. There would be no substantial degrade to the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.5 - Aesthetics
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
c. Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
57 Response: d) The proposed development would comply with all lighting standards established in the City’s Zoning Ordinance (Title 9, Chapter 5, Article B, Section 4). There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
58 Response: a), b), c), d), e) There will not be any conversion of farmland, nor conflict with any existing zoning for agricultural use or forest land, or Williamson Act contracts. The proposed Project site is classified as “urban and built-up land” by the Department of Conservation’s Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). The site is an undeveloped-vacant urban parcel.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.6 - Agriculture and Forestry Resources
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,
or Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use or a Williamson Act Contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
59 The proposed Project is located within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The proposed Project consists of the development and operation of 134 residential lot subdivision.

Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL)
The District has established thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant emissions, which are based on District New Source Review (NSR) offset requirements for stationary sources.

Using project type and size, the District has pre-qualified emissions and determined a size below which it is reasonable to conclude that a project would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants. In the interest of streamlining CEQA requirements, projects that fit the descriptions and project sizes provided below are deemed to have a less than significant impact on air quality and as such are excluded from quantifying criteria pollutant emissions for CEQA purposes. Table 3-1 below shows the SPAL thresholds for single-family projects.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.7 - Air Quality

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of
the applicable air quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute
substantially to an existing or projected air
quality violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
60 Table 3-1
SPAL Thresholds – Single Family
Vehicle Trip Thresholds Project Type Thresholds
Single Family – 1,453 trips/day Single Family – 134 units Response: a) The project includes the division of 20 gross acres to create 134 residential lots. The ultimate build out of these lots would consist of up to 134 residential lots and is projected to generate approximately 1,282 additional daily trips (at a worst-case scenario) within the existing residential area (134 lots X 9.57 average trips per household). Therefore, the project qualifies as a SPAL and is deemed to have a less than significant impact on air quality.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: b) There are two pollutants of concern for this impact: CO and localized PM10.

The proposed Project would not result in localized CO hotspots or PM 10 impacts as discussed below. Therefore, the proposed Project would not violate an air quality standard or contribute to a violation of an air quality standard in the Project area.

Localized PM10
Localized PM10 would be generated by Project construction activities, which would include earth-disturbing activities. The proposed Project would comply with the SJVAPCD's Regulation VIII dust control requirements during construction. Compliance with this regulation would reduce the potential for significant localized PM10 impacts to less than significant levels.

CO Hotspot
Localized high levels of CO are associated with traffic congestion and idling or slow-moving vehicles. The SJVAPCD provides screening criteria to determine when to quantify local CO concentrations based on impacts to the level of service (LOS) of roadways in the Project vicinity.

This proposed Project would result in the division of 20 gross acres to create 134 residential lots. Construction of the proposed Project would result in minor-temporary increases in traffic for the surrounding road network during the construction period and an estimated 1,282 daily trips (134 lots x 9.57 average trips per household) during the operation, which is the worst-case scenario. The minor increase in trips would not substantially lower the LOS.

Therefore, the Project would not generate, or substantially contribute to, additional traffic that would exceed State or federal CO standards.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
61 Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: c) The SJVAPCD does not have quantifiable thresholds for analyzing a project’s cumulative impacts on air quality. As previously determined, the project will have a less than significant impact on air quality since it qualified as a SPAL. Since a majority of the surrounding land is developed, there are not many opportunities for new development to occur in the future. Therefore, the project plus future projects combined, will not create a cumulatively considerable increase in criteria pollutants.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: d) The proposed Project is consistent with the surrounding land uses and would not create or expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations or emissions (Figure 2-4).

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: e) According to the 2015 SJVAPCD’s GAMAQI, analysis of potential odor impacts should be conducted for the following two situations:
• Generators – projects that would potentially generate odorous emissions proposed to locate near existing sensitive receptors or other land uses where people may congregate; and
• Receivers – residential or other sensitive receptor projects or other projects built for the intent of attracting people locating near existing odor sources.

The proposed Project does not meet any of these two criteria.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
62 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.8 - Biological Resources
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special-status species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of
any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species, or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
habitat conservation plan, natural community
conservation plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
Methodology: Database searches were conducted to determine which sensitive biological resources historically occurred on and within 10 miles of the Project site. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) (CNDDB 2017), California Native Plants Society (CNPS) 63 database (CNPS 2017), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Threatened and Endangered Species List (USFWS 2017a), and USFWS Critical Habitat database (USFWS 2017b) were reviewed to identify State and federal special-status species were searched. The CNDDB provides element-specific spatial information on individual documented occurrences of special-status species and sensitive natural vegetation communities. The CNPS database provides similar information specific to plant species, but at a much lower spatial resolution.

The USFWS query generates a list of federally-protected species known to potentially occur within individual USGS quadrangles. Wildlife species designated as “Fully Protected” by California Fish and Game Code Sections 5050 (Fully Protected reptiles and amphibians), 3511 (Fully Protected birds), 5515 (Full Protected Fish), and 4700 (Fully Protected mammals) are added to the list.

Additional databases that were accessed included the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map (NWI 2017), the USGS topographical maps, National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) (NHD 2017), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year floodplain database (FEMA 2017), and the Recovery Plan for Upland Species of the San Joaquin Valley and Essential Connectivity Habitat Areas for wildlife corridors (Spencer 2010).

Response: a), b) The CNDDB searches listed historical occurrences of five special-status bird species, three special-status plant species, nine special-status wildlife species and one sensitive natural community within a 10-mile buffer around the Project site (Figure 3-1 through Figure 3-4). However, none of these records occurred on or within the immediate vicinity of the Project site.

No USFWS-designated Critical Habitat units occur on the Project site. Critical Habitat for the Buena Vista Lake ornate Shrew (Sorex ornatus relictus) is over five miles southwest of the site (Figure 3-5). Riparian habitats are defined as vegetative communities that are influenced by a river or stream, specifically the land area that encompasses the water channel and its current or potential floodplain. No riparian habitat occurs on or near the Project site. No sensitive natural communities or critical habitats occur on or near the Project site.

The proposed Project site is frequently disked and surrounded by residential urban uses to the north and bordered by Highway 41 and 198 to the west, east and south. The potential for special-status species to occur on the site is low; however, a pre-construction survey would need to be completed to ensure there is no evidence of occupation by special-status species on the Project site. General mitigation measures are included to prevent any potential impacts during construction. Therefore, there would be a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Mitigation Measures:

MM 3.8.1: A qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey on the Project site and within 500 feet of its perimeter within 14 days and no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction activities.
64 If any evidence of occupation of the Project site by listed or other special-status species is subsequently observed, a buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist that results in sufficient avoidance to comply with applicable regulations. If sufficient avoidance cannot be established, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game shall be contacted for further guidance and consultation on additional measures.

If nesting raptors are identified during the surveys, active raptor nests should be avoided by 500 feet and all other migratory bird nests should be avoided by 250 feet. Avoidance buffers may be reduced if a qualified and approved on-site monitor determines that encroachment into the buffer area is not affecting nest building, the rearing of young, or otherwise affect the breeding behaviors of the resident birds. Avoidance buffers can also be reduced through consultation with the CDFW and USFWS. If Swainson's hawks are found to nest within the survey area, active Swainson’s hawk nests shall be avoided by 0.5 mile unless this avoidance buffer is reduced through consultation with the CDFW and/or USFWS. 65 No construction or earth-moving activity shall occur within a non-disturbance buffer until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have fledged (that is, left the nest) and have attained sufficient flight skills to avoid Project construction areas. This typically occurs by early July, but September 1st is considered the end of the nesting period unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Once raptors have completed nesting and young have fledged, disturbance buffers will no longer be needed and can be removed, and monitoring can be terminated.

3. If western burrowing owls are present in the non-breeding season and must be passively relocated from the Project site, passive relocation shall not commence until October 1st and must be completed by February 1st. Passive relocation must only be conducted by a qualified biologist or ornithologist and with approval by CDFW. After passive relocation, the area where owls occurred and its immediate vicinity shall be monitored by a qualified biologist daily for one week and once per week for an additional two weeks to document that owls are not reoccupying the site.

4. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of a Project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than 2-feet deep should be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials. If the trenches cannot be closed, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen-fill or wooden planks shall be installed. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the USFWS and the CDFW shall be contacted at the addresses provided below.

5. Kit foxes are attracted to den-like structures such as pipes and may enter stored pipes and become trapped or injured. All construction pipes, culverts, or similar structures with a diameter of 4-inches or greater that are stored at a construction site for one or more overnight periods shall be thoroughly inspected for kit foxes before the pipe is subsequently buried, capped, or otherwise used or moved in any way. If a kit fox is 67 discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the USFWS has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.

7. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens.

10. An employee education program shall be conducted. The program shall consist of a brief presentation by persons knowledgeable in San Joaquin kit fox biology and legislative protection to explain endangered species concerns to contractors, their employees, and military and/or agency personnel involved in the Project. The program shall include: a description of the San Joaquin kit fox and its habitat needs; a report of the occurrence of kit fox in the Project area; an explanation of the status of the species and its protection under the Endangered Species Act; and a list of measures being taken to reduce impacts to the species during Project construction and implementation. A fact sheet conveying this information shall be prepared for distribution to the previously referenced people and anyone else who may enter the Project sites.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: c) No National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) features or blue-line drainages (as found on USGS topographic maps and in the National Hydrography Dataset) occurred on the Project site (Figure 3-6).

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: d) The proposed Project site does not occur within a known migration route, significant wildlife corridor, or linkage area as identified in the Recovery Plan for Upland Species in the San Joaquin Valley (USFWS 1998). The site is located within areas of residential development and highways. Wildlife movement corridors are routes that provide shelter and sufficient food supplies to support regular movements of wildlife species. A movement corridor is a continuous geographic extent of habitat that either spatially or functionally links ecosystems across fragmented, or otherwise inhospitable, landscapes. 69 Faunal movement may include seasonal or migration movement, life cycle links, species dispersal, re-colonization of an area, and movement in response to external pressures.

Movement corridors typically include riparian habitats, ridgelines, and ravines, as well as other contiguous expanses of natural habitats. Movement corridors may be functional on regional, sub-regional, or local scales.

No significant wildlife movement corridors, core areas, or Essential Habitat Connectivity areas occur on or near the Project site. The Project would not substantially affect migrating birds or other wildlife. The Project will not restrict, eliminate, or significantly alter wildlife movement corridors, core areas, or Essential Habitat Connectivity areas either during construction or after the Project has been constructed. Project construction will not substantially interfere with wildlife movements or reduce breeding opportunities.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: e), f) The City of Lemoore does not have any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources nor an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
70 Figure 3-1
CNDDB Special-Status Birds
71 Figure 3-2
CNDDB Special-Status Invertebrates, Fish, Amphibians and Reptiles 72 Figure 3-3
CNDDB Special-Status Mammals
73 Figure 3-4
CNDDB Sensitive Natural Communities and Special-Status Plant Species
74 Figure 3-5
USFWS Critical Habitat
75 Figure 3-6
National Wetland Inventory and Hydrologic Information
76 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.9 - Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined
in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
Response: a), b) As discussed in Section 3.5 – Aesthetics, there are no identified historical resources within the vicinity of the Project site. There is a low potential for grounddisturbing activities to expose and affect previously unknown significant cultural resources, including historical or prehistorical resources at the Project site. However, there is still a possibility that historical materials may be exposed during construction. Grading and trenching, as well as other ground-disturbing actions, have the potential to damage or destroy these previously unidentified and potentially significant cultural resources within the Project area, including historical resources. Disturbance of any deposits that have the potential to provide significant cultural data would be considered a significant impact under CEQA.

Although considered unlikely since there is no indication of any archaeological resources on or in the vicinity of the Project site, subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed Project could potentially damage or destroy previously undiscovered archaeological resources.

Mitigation Measures:

MM 3.9.1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural or archaeological materials are encountered during construction activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource 77 materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants. If the qualified professional archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: c) There are no unique geological features or known fossil-bearing sediments in the vicinity of the Project site. However, there remains the possibility for previously unknown, buried paleontological resources or unique geological sites to be uncovered during subsurface construction activities.

Mitigation Measures:

Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource appropriate measures are recommended or the materials are determined to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency. 78 Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource appropriate measures are recommended or the materials are determined to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: d) Human remains including known cemeteries are not known to exist within the Project area. However, construction would involve earth-disturbing activities, and it is still possible that human remains may be discovered, possibly in association with archaeological sites.

Mitigation Measures:

MM 3.9.3: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide any potential Native American involvement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 79 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.10 - Geology and Soils
Would the project:
a. Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault,
as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative
wastewater disposal systems in areas where
sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
80 Response: a), b), c), d), e) There are no known active seismic faults in Kings County or within its immediate vicinity. The principle earthquake hazard affecting the area is ground shaking as opposed to surface rupture or ground failure (City of Lemoore , 2008). Per the Department of Conservation Landslide Map, the City of Lemoore does not contain any areas that are prone to landslides (Department of Conservation, 2017). As shown in Figure 3-1, the site contains Lakeside loam, partially drained and Lemoore sandy loam, partially drained soil.

Both soils are very deep, somewhat poorly drained, saline-alkali soils that are mainly used for irrigated crops and urban development (United States Department of Agriculture, 1986).

Impacts from soil erosion would be minimal as it most likely occurs on sloped areas and the project site is relatively flat and the site soils contain zero to one percent slopes. Per Table 15 of the Kings County Soil Survey, the site soils have a low shrink-swell potential; therefore, the site does not contain expansive soils (United States Department of Agriculture, 1986).

The proposed residential developments would be required to comply with City building code requirements and Lemoore’s General Plan policies, and their cited regulations, that mitigate seismic hazards and soils-related structural concerns for permitted development.

The Project site is not located on an unstable geologic unit or soil nor on expansive soil. The proposed Project does not include the development of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems as the Project would hook up to the City’s existing sewer system.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impacts and less than significant impacts. 81 Figure 3-7
Soil Map
82 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.11 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Response: a), b) Greenhouse gas (GHG) significance thresholds are based on the 2014 Kings County Regional Climate Action Plan (CAP). According to the CAP, the AB 32 Scoping Plan encourages local governments to establish a GHG reduction target that “parallels the State’s commitment to reduce GHG emissions by approximately 15 percent from current levels by 2020.” Therefore, this CAP establishes a reduction target to achieve emissions levels 15 percent below 2005 baseline levels by 2020 consistent with the AB 32 Scoping Plan.

Proposed development projects that are consistent with the emission reduction and adaptation measures included in the CAP and the programs that are developed as a result of the CAP, would be considered to have a less than significant cumulative impact on climate change. Therefore, the 15 percent reduction will be used as the significance threshold for GHG emissions for this analysis.

The Project Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod, the SJVAPCD’s approved modeling system for quantifying emissions. The results are shown in the Table 3-5 below* Table 3-5
Project GHG Emissions
CO2e (tons/year)
Business as Usual (2005) 3,326
Project (2019) 1,958
% reduction 15%
15% reduction met? YES
*See Appendix B for calculations
Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
83 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.12 - Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport,
use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or involve
handling hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within onequarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant
to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result, would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f. For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
g. Impair implementation of, or physically
interfere with, an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h. Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury, or death involving
wildland fires, including where wildlands are
84 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Response: a), b), c) There will not be any hazardous material transported to and from the project site, nor utilized thereon after construction. Project construction activities may involve the use of hazardous materials. These materials might include fuels, oils, mechanical fluids, and other chemicals used during construction. The use of such materials would be considered minimal and would not require these materials to be stored in large quantities.

There will not be any hazardous material stored in unapproved quantities at the site.

Adherence to regulations and standard protocols during storage, transport, and use of hazardous materials would minimize or avoid potential upset and accident conditions involving the release of such materials into the environment.

P.W. Engvall Elementary School is located approximately a half mile northeast of the proposed Project site. The proposed Project would not emit hazardous emissions or involve handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼-mile of an existing school.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
d) Per the Cortese List, there are no hazardous waste and substances sites in the vicinity of the Project site (Cal EPA, 2017). Additionally, the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker compiles a list of Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites. There are no LUST Cleanup Sites within the vicinity of the Project site (California Water Resources Board, 2017). The proposed Project site is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and would therefore not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
e), f) There are two private airstrips and no public airports within the Lemoore area including Reeves Field at the Naval Air Station and Stone Airstrip. There is no adopted airport land use plan for the City of Lemoore. Both are located outside of the City’s limits and would not impact the proposed Project.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
85 g) The City of Lemoore published an Emergency Operations Plan in 2005, which provides guidance to City staff in the event of extraordinary emergency situation associated with natural disaster and technological incidents (City of Lemoore , 2008). The proposed Project would not interfere with the City’s adopted emergency response plan; therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
h) The proposed Project site is in an unzoned area of the Kings County Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map Local Responsibility Area (LRA). However, Cal Fire has determined that portions of the City of Lemoore are categorized as a Moderate Fire Hazard Severity Zone in LRA. The Project site is not within a wildland area nor is there within the vicinity of the Project site.

The Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
86 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact

3.13 - Hydrology and Water Quality
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies
or interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that there would be a net
deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells
would drop to a level that would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner that would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on site or off
site?
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner that
would result in flooding on site or off site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water that
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?
g. Place housing within a 100-year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal flood
hazard boundary or flood insurance rate
map or other flood hazard delineation map?
87 Response: a), f) Project construction would cause ground disturbance that could result in soil erosion or siltation and subsequent water quality degradation offsite, which is a potentially significant impact. Construction-related activities would also involve the use of materials such as vehicle fuels, lubricating fluids, solvents, and other materials that could result in polluted runoff, which is also a potentially significant impact. However, the potential consequences of any spill or release of these types of materials are generally small due to the localized, short-term nature of such releases because of construction. The volume of any spills would likely be relatively small because the volume in any single vehicle or container would generally be anticipated to be less than 50 gallons.

As required by the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit (No. 2012-0006-DWQ) for stormwater discharges associated with construction and land disturbance activities, the City must develop and implement a SWPPP that specifies BMPs to prevent construction pollutants from contacting stormwater, with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving offsite. The City is required to comply with the Construction General Permit because Project-related construction activities result in soil disturbances of least 1 one acre of total land area. Mitigation Measure MM HYD-1 below requires the preparation and implementation of a SWPPP to comply with the Construction General Permit requirements.

With implementation of Mitigation Measures MM HYD-1, the Project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements (WDRs) during the construction period, and impacts would be less than significant.

Project operation would not violate any water quality standards or WDRs because it: 1) does not result in point-source pollution (e.g., outfall pipe) discharges into surface waters that require WDRs and 2) would be developed in compliance with the General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater from Small MS4s (No. 2013-0001-DWQ) in which the City is one of the permittees. Operators of MS4s1, like the City, serve urbanized areas with populations fewer than 100,000. To comply with the MS4 General Permit, the Project would have to comply with City design standards to maximize the reduction of pollutant loading in runoff to the maximum extent practicable. The City Building Department would review grading and 1 MS4s are defined as a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels or storm drains): 1) designed or used for collecting and/or conveying storm water; 2) which is not a combined sewer; and 3) which is not part or a Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures that would impede or redirect
flood flows?
i. Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury, or death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j. Contribute to inundation by seiche, tsunami,
or mudflow?
88 site plans to ensure compliance before approving such plans. The site plan review process ensures that operations of the Project would not violate water quality standards outlined in the MS4 General Permit, and operational impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures:

Conclusion:

Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: b) The City of Lemoore currently utilizes local groundwater as its sole source of supply from underground aquifers via ten active groundwater wells. The groundwater basin underlying the City is the Tulare Lake Basin and the City of Lemoore is immediately adjacent to the south boundary of the Kings subbasin. Water for construction and operation would come from the City of Lemoore’s existing water system. Per the City’s Urban Water Management Plan, the City’s existing system has a total supply capacity of 21,674,000 gallons per day with an average day demand of 8,769,000 gallons (City of Lemoore, 2013). The proposed Project would have temporary construction water usage and operation is estimated to demand approximately 40,870 gallons per day requiring 0.19% of the total supply capacity. Since the proposed Project would have minimal impacts on the City’s water supply, impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
89 Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: c), d), e) The Project site is relatively flat and Project grading would be minimal and consist of mostly grubbing the site to remove vegetation. The topography of the site would not appreciably change because of grading activities. The site does not contain any blue-line water features, including streams or rivers. Construction-related erosion and sedimentation impacts as a result of soil disturbance would be less than significant after implementation of a SWPPP (MM 3.12.1). The Project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: g), h) As shown in Figure 3-8, the Project is not located within a FEMA 100-year floodplain. The Project would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal flood hazard boundary or flood insurance rate map or other flood hazard delineation map. The Project would not place, within a 100-year flood hazard areas, structures that would impede or redirect flood flows. There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: i) The City of Lemoore is located within the Pine Flat Dam inundation area. Pine Flat Dam is located east of the valley floor in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. If Pine Flat Dam failed while at full capacity, its floodwaters would arrive in Kings County within approximately five hours (Kings County, 2010). Dam failure has been adequately planned for through the Kings County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, which identifies a dam failure hazard to be of medium significance and unlikely to occur in the City of Lemoore (Kings County, 2007). With the implementation of the Kings County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, impacts related to dam failure would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: j) The Project site is not located near the ocean, body of water or a steep topographic feature (i.e., mountain, hill, bluff, etc.). Therefore, there is no potential for the site to be inundated by seiche, tsunami or mudflow. There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
90 Figure 3-8
FEMA Map
91 Response: a) The Project would not physically divide an established community (see Figure 2-1). The proposed residential development would connect to the surrounding uses and City road network.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
b) If approved, the new general plan and zoning designations would be consistent with the Project as proposed and therefore no impacts will be created.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
c) The Project site is not within the boundaries of an adopted habitat or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.14 - Land Use and Planning
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established
community?
b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to, the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal Program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c. Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
92 Response: a), b) The City of Lemoore and the surrounding area are designated as Mineral Resources Zone 1 (MRZ-1) by the State Mining and Geology Board (SMGB). MRZ-1 areas are described as those for which adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.

Additionally, per the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR), there are no active, inactive, or capped oil wells located within the Project site, and it is not within a DOGGR-recognized oilfield. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less–thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.15 - Mineral Resources
Would the project:

a. Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan, or other land use plan?
93 Response: a) Project construction would generate temporary increases in noise levels. Title 5, Chapter 6 of the City’s Municipal Code establishes regulations and enforcement procedures for noise generated in the city. The regulations do not apply to the operation on days other than Sunday of construction equipment or of a construction vehicle, or the performance on days other than Sunday of construction work, between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 8:00 P.M., provided that all required permits for the operation of such construction equipment or construction vehicle or the performance of such construction work have been obtained from the appropriate city department (Lemoore Municipal Code 5-6-1-C.4). The City of Lemoore 2030 General Plan (City of Lemoore , 2008) has objectives to minimize residential development noise levels. The proposed Project would comply with all regulations, standards and policies within the City’s General Plan and Municipal Code.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.16 - Noise
Would the project result in:
a. Exposure of persons to, or generate, noise
levels in excess of standards established in a
local general plan or noise ordinance or
applicable standards of other agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generate
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e. For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
94 Therefore, the Project would not result in the exposure of persons to, or generate, noise levels more than standards established in a local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: b), c), d) The Project involves the construction and operation of 134-residential units. As shown in Figure 2-4, the Project would be consistent with the surrounding land uses and would not cause out of the ordinary noise levels than what is currently established in the area. Construction of the Project would generate temporary ground borne vibrations.

However, like construction noise, such vibrations would be attenuated over distance to the point where they would not be felt by the nearest receptors. Additionally, construction would be done during the daylight hours and would be temporary so the surrounding land uses would not be affected by construction of the new development. The Project would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels and would not result in substantial permanent, temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels above the existing environment.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: e), f) There are no airports within two miles of the Project site, nor is it in the vicinity of a private airstrip. The Lemoore Zoning Ordinance has adopted a military influence area that identifies areas that may be subject to noise impacts from the Naval Air Station Lemoore, which is approximately seven miles west of the project site. The project site is outside of the established Naval Air Station Lemoore Overlay Zone. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
95 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less- than
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.17 - Population and Housing
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial population growth in an
area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Response: a) The proposed Project would accommodate, but not induce, population growth.

Table 2-34 of the Kings County and Cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford and Lemoore 2016- 2024 Housing Element (2016-2024 Housing Element) shows the City of Lemoore’s housing needs allocations for the 2014-2024 period. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan determines the number and affordability of housing units that jurisdictions need to plan for through land use policies, regulations, infrastructure plans, and other housing assistance programs (Kings County, 2016). Construction and development of the proposed 134 singlefamily units would assist in meeting the RHNA Plan, which allocates for 2,773 units of different income category. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: b), c) The Project site is currently undeveloped. Therefore, the Project would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people. There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
96 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.18 - Public Services
Would the project:
a. Result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times, or to other
performance objectives for any of the public
services:
i. Fire protection?
ii. Police protection?
iii. Schools?
iv. Parks?
v. Other public facilities?
Response: a) In general, impacts to public services from implementation of a Project are due to its ability to induce population growth and, in turn, result in a greater need for fire and police protection, etc. to serve the increased population. The proposed Project includes the construction and operation of 134 single-family residential units, which would accommodate the City’s future population growth and require amenities provided by public services. Additionally, the Project would not physically affect any existing government facilities as the proposed site is currently undeveloped. As part of the City’s project approval processes, the applicant will be required to construct the infrastructure needed to serve the Project site and pay the appropriate impact fees to cover the subdivision’s impacts to public services.
i. Fire suppression support is provided by the City of Lemoore Volunteer Fire Department (LVFD). The LVFD has three stations and the closest station to the Project site is located near the intersection of Fox Street and C Street approximately a mile northeast of the Project site. The proposed Project would result in the construction and operation of 134 residential units in south-central Lemoore. Construction activities would be in accordance with local and State fire codes. Fire services are 97 adequately planned for within the City’s General Plan through policies to ensure the City maintains Fire Department performance and response standards by allocating the appropriate resources. As stated, the Daley Homes Project applicant is responsible for constructing any infrastructure needed to serve the subdivision and pay the appropriate impact fees, which would reduce impacts to less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
ii. Law enforcement and public protection are provided by the City of Lemoore Police Department. The City’s police station is located at 657 Fox Street on the northwest corner of Fox Street and Cinnamon Drive. The station is approximately a mile northeast of the Project site. As discussed, the proposed Project would not induce but accommodate population growth, and therefore would not increase demands for public safety protection. As stated, the Daley Homes Project applicant is responsible for constructing any infrastructure needed to serve the subdivision and pay the appropriate impact fees. Impacts on police protection services related to population growth would therefore be considered less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
iii. The schools that would be accommodating the proposed subdivision are P.W. Engvall Elementary School, Liberty Middle School, and Lemoore Union High School. Per the Parks, Schools, and Community Facilities Element of the 2030 General Plan, both the elementary and middle schools are running under capacity. Additionally, the City has identified several sites for a future high school to accommodate population growth as the current high school is running 17% over capacity. Since the proposed Project would be accommodating population growth, the impact to schools would be considered less than significant. The developer will be required to pay established school impact fees upon construction of the homes.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
iv. The proposed Project includes the development of 134 residential lots. The City is currently maintaining a 5-acre to 1,000 residents park ratio, which exceeds current City Park Standards and Quimby Act requirements (City of Lemoore , 2008). The Project would have no impact to the City park system.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
98 v. The proposed Project does not include any other impacts to public facilities.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
99 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less–thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.19 - Recreation
Would the project:
a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
b. Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational
facilities that might have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
Response: a), b) As discussed, the population growth accommodated by the Project (134 homes x 3.05 persons per home) is approximately 409 people. The City’s General Plan indicates that the City is continuing to maintain its parkland dedication standard of 5 acres of park land per 1,000 residents. There would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
100
Response: a) The City’s transportation policies and requirements are incorporated in its General Plan. The only such policy which is affected by this Project is that requiring that no Level of Service violations be engendered by a Project. Per the City’s Circulation Element of

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.20 - Transportation and Traffic
Would the project:
a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance
or policy establishing measures of
effectiveness for the performance of the
circulation system, taking into account all
modes of transportation including mass
transit and non-motorized travel and
relevant components of the circulation
system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and
mass transit?
b. Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not
limited to level of service standards and
travel demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or
highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels
or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d. Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e. Result in inadequate emergency access?
f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
Programs regarding public transit, bicycle,
or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safety of such
facilities?
101
the City of Lemoore 2030 General Plan Update (City of Lemoore , 2008), the “City of Lemoore does not currently have any adopted level of service (LOS) standard. However, recent traffic studies have used level of service D as the standard for evaluating project impacts at intersections.” A LOS of D is characterized by congestion with average vehicle speeds decreasing below the user’s desired level for two and four land roads. The Level of Service for 19th Avenue is C; the daily traffic of the Project site is, 1,282 cars per day (9.57 trips per day per residence; see Section 3.3 - Air Quality). As discussed in the Population and Housing Section, the Project will be accommodating future population growth. The calculated trips per day is considered the worst-case scenario. It is assumed that the LOS of the surrounding streets would remain the same. Additionally, trips to bring materials for construction to the site would be temporary. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system. Impacts would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.

Response: b) Neither the City of Lemoore or Kings County has an adopted congestion management program. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: c) As discussed, there are no public airports or private airstrips within the vicinity of the Project site and the Project does not include the construction of any structures that would interfere with air traffic patterns. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: d), e) The Project would not involve design features that would increase hazards or involve the development of incompatible uses. It would also not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.

Response: f) The Project would not affect existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the surrounding area. There is no conflict with the Kings County’s 2005 Regional Bicycle Plan; therefore, there would be no impact.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.
102
Conclusion: There would be no impact.
103

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less–thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.21 - Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the project:
a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and scope of the
landscape, sacred place, or object with
cultural value to a California Native American
tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical
Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k), or
ii. A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and
supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In
applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource
Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency
shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native
American tribe.

Response: a) The Project is not located within an area with known tribal cultural resources.

As discussed in the Section 3.9 - Cultural Resources, there are no historical resources located on or within the vicinity of the Project site. Additionally, consultation has been requested from the local tribes; however, no responses have been received. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact to tribal cultural resources.

Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: There would be no impact.
104

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less-thanSignificant
Impact

No
Impact

3.22 - Utilities and Service Systems
Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements
of the applicable Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new
water or wastewater treatment facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new
stormwater drainage facilities or expansion
of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project from existing entitlements
and resources, or would new or expanded
entitlements be needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider that serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project’s projected demand in
addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project’s solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes
and regulations related to solid waste?
Response: a), b), c), d), e), f), g) Like public services, the Project applicant is required to either extend the needed utility infrastructure or pay impact fees to accommodate the subdivision’s impact to local utility and infrastructure systems. The City’s wastewater facilities, water system, storm drainage system, and solid waste disposal programs have capacity for, or are planned to maintain capacity for, community growth in accord with the adopted General Plan.
105
Mitigation Measures: None are required.

Conclusion: Impacts would be less than significant.
106
Response: a) As evaluated in this IS/MND, the proposed Project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels; threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species; or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Mitigation measures have been included to lessen the significance of potential impacts. Similar mitigation measures would be expected of other projects in the surrounding area, most of which share a similar cultural paleontological and biological resources. Consequently, the incremental effects of the proposed project, after mitigation, would not contribute to an adverse cumulative impact on these resources.

Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Mitigation Measures:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated

Less than
Significant
Impact

No
Impact

3.23 - Mandatory Findings of
Significance
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of a
project are significant when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c. Does the project have environmental effects
that would cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
107
Implement Mitigation Measures MM 3.8.1 through MM 3.8.4, MM CUL 3.9.1 through MM 3.9.3 and MM 3.12.1.

Conclusion:

Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: b) As described in the impact analyses in Sections 3.5 through 3.22 of this IS/MND, any potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project would be reduced to a less-than significant level following incorporation of the mitigation measures listed in Appendix A – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. All planned projects in the vicinity of the proposed Project would be subject to review in separate environmental documents and required to conform to the City of Lemoore General Plan, zoning, mitigate for project-specific impacts, and provide appropriate engineering to ensure the development meets applicable federal, State and local regulations and codes. As currently designed, and with compliance of the recommended mitigation measures, the proposed Project would not contribute to a cumulative impact. Thus, the cumulative impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would be less than cumulatively considerable.

Mitigation Measures:

Implement Mitigation Measures MM 3.8.1 through MM 3.8.4, MM CUL 3.9.1 through MM 3.9.3 and MM 3.12.1.

Conclusion:

Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Response: c) All of the Project’s impacts, both direct and indirect, that are attributable to the Project were identified and mitigated to a less than significant level. As shown in Appendix A - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Project proponent has agreed to implement mitigation substantially reducing or eliminating impacts of the Project. All planned projects in the vicinity of the proposed Project would be subject to review in separate environmental documents and required to conform to the City of Lemoore General Plan, zoning, mitigate for project-specific impacts, and provide appropriate engineering to ensure the development meets are applicable federal, State and local regulations and codes.

Thus, the cumulative impacts of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would be less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, the proposed Project would not either directly or indirectly cause substantial adverse effects on human beings because all potentially adverse direct impacts of the proposed Project are identified as having no impact, less than significant impact, or less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated.

Mitigation Measures:

Implement Mitigation Measures MM 3.8.1 through MM 3.8.4, MM CUL 3.9.1 through MM 3.9.3 and MM 3.12.1.
108
Conclusion:

Impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 109
SECTION 4 - REFERENCES
Cal EPA. (2017, May 8). Superfund Cleanup Site List. Retrieved from Cortese List:
https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/
Cal Fire. (2006). California Wildland Hazard Severity Zone Map Update. Retrieved from Local Responsibility Area (LRA) Map:
http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_statewide California Water Resources Board. (2017, May 8). GeoTracker. Retrieved from https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/
Caltrans. (2017). California Scenic Highway Mapping System . California, United States of America.

City of Lemoore . (2008). 2030 General Plan.

City of Lemoore. (2013). Urban Water Management Plan.

Department of Conservation. (2017, May 9). CGS Information Warehouse. California, United States of America.

Kings County. (2007). Kings County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Kings County. (2010). 2035 General Plan . Hanford: Kings County Community Development Agency.

Kings County. (2016). 2016-2024 Housing Element of Kings County and the Cities of Avenal, Corcoran, Hanford and Lemoore.

United States Department of Agriculture. (1986). Soil Survey of Kings County California. 110

APPENDIX A

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
111

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Daley Homes General Plan Amendment and Zone Change
Mitigation Measure Timeframe Responsible
Monitoring Agency
Date Initial
MM 3.8.1: A qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey on the Project site and within 500 feet of its perimeter within 14 days of and no more than 30 days prior to the start of construction activities.

If any evidence of occupation of the Project site by listed or other specialstatus species is subsequently observed, a buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist that results in sufficient avoidance to comply with applicable regulations. If sufficient avoidance cannot be established, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game shall be contacted for further guidance and consultation on additional measures. The Project proponent shall obtain any required permits from the appropriate wildlife agency. Copies of all permits and evidence of compliance with applicable regulations shall be submitted to the lead agency.

The following buffer distances shall be established prior to construction activities:
• San Joaquin kit fox or American badger potential den: 50 feet; • San Joaquin kit fox known den: 100 feet;
• San Joaquin kit fox or American badger pupping den: contact the California Department of Fish and Game and United States Fish and Wildlife Service;
• Burrowing owl burrow outside of breeding season: 160 feet; • Burrowing owl burrow during breeding season: 250 feet; • Swainson’s hawk nest during breeding season: ½ mile;
Prior to
construction
Lead Agency
112
• Other protected raptor nests during the breeding season: 300 feet; • Other protected nesting migratory bird nests during the breeding season: 50 feet; and
• Other special-status wildlife species: as recommended by qualified biologist.

No construction or earth-moving activity shall occur within a nondisturbance buffer until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the young have fledged (that is, left the nest) and have attained sufficient flight skills to avoid Project construction areas. This typically occurs by early July, but September 1st is considered the end of the nesting period unless otherwise determined by a qualified biologist. Once raptors have completed nesting and young have fledged, disturbance buffers will no longer be needed and can be removed, and monitoring can be terminated.

During
construction
Lead Agency
113
MM 3.8.3: If any burrowing owl burrows are observed during the preconstruction survey, avoidance measures shall be consistent and in accordance with protocols outlined in the Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines (Burrowing Owl Consortium 1993) and the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012). Active burrows shall be avoided, but if avoidance is not possible then compensation shall be provided for the active or passive displacement of western burrowing owls, and habitat acquisition and the creation of artificial dens for any western burrowing owls shall be provided for any owls relocated from construction areas. These measures are outlined as follows:

3. If western burrowing owls are present in the non-breeding season and must be passively relocated from the Project site, passive relocation shall not commence until October 1st and must be completed by February 1st. Passive relocation must only be conducted by a qualified biologist or ornithologist and with approval by CDFW. After passive relocation, the area where owls occurred and its immediate vicinity shall be monitored by a qualified biologist daily for one week and once During
construction
Lead Agency
114
per week for an additional two weeks to document that owls are not reoccupying the site.

Compensation acreage shall be determined as described in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFW 2012).

MM 3.8.4: The measures listed below shall be implemented during construction:

San Joaquin kit fox USFWS Exclusion Zone Recommendations Den Type Recommendation
Potential Den 50-foot radius
Known Den 100-foot radius
Natal/Pupping Den (Occupied
and Unoccupied)
Contact U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
for guidance
Atypical Den 50-foot radius

Replacement dens will be required if such dens are removed. Potential dens that are removed do not need to be replaced if they are determined to be inactive by using standard monitoring techniques (e.g., applying tracking medium around the den opening and monitoring for San Joaquin kit fox tracks for three consecutive nights).

3. Project-related vehicles shall observe a daytime speed limit of 20-mph throughout the site in all Project areas, except on County roads and During
construction
Lead Agency
115
State and federal highways; this is particularly important at night when kit foxes and badgers are most active. Night-time construction shall be minimized to the extent possible. However, if construction at night does occur, then the speed limit shall be reduced to 10-mph. Off-road traffic outside of designated Project areas shall be prohibited.

4. To prevent inadvertent entrapment of kit foxes or other animals during the construction phase of a Project, all excavated, steep-walled holes or trenches more than 2-feet deep should be covered at the close of each working day by plywood or similar materials. If the trenches cannot be closed, one or more escape ramps constructed of earthen-fill or wooden planks shall be installed. Before such holes or trenches are filled, they shall be thoroughly inspected for trapped animals. If at any time a trapped or injured kit fox is discovered, the USFWS and the CDFW shall be contacted at the addresses provided below.

If a kit fox is discovered inside a pipe, that section of pipe shall not be moved until the USFWS has been consulted. If necessary, and under the direct supervision of the biologist, the pipe may be moved only once to remove it from the path of construction activity, until the fox has escaped.

7. No pets, such as dogs or cats, shall be permitted on the Project sites to prevent harassment, mortality of kit foxes, or destruction of dens.

8. Use of rodenticides and herbicides in Project areas shall be restricted.

This is necessary to prevent primary or secondary poisoning of kit foxes and the depletion of prey populations on which they depend. All uses of such compounds shall observe label and other restrictions 116
mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Department of Food and Agriculture, and other State and Federal legislation, as well as additional Project-related restrictions deemed necessary by the USFWS. If rodent control must be conducted, zinc phosphide shall be used because of a proven lower risk to kit fox.

10. An employee education program shall be conducted. The program shall consist of a brief presentation by persons knowledgeable in San Joaquin kit fox biology and legislative protection to explain endangered species concerns to contractors, their employees, and military and/or agency personnel involved in the Project. The program shall include: a description of the San Joaquin kit fox and its habitat needs; a report of the occurrence of kit fox in the Project area; an explanation of the status of the species and its protection under the Endangered Species Act; and a list of measures being taken to reduce impacts to the species during Project construction and implementation. A fact sheet conveying this information shall be prepared for distribution to the previously referenced people and anyone else who may enter the Project sites.

11. Upon completion of the Project, all areas subject to temporary ground disturbances, including storage and staging areas, temporary roads, pipeline corridors, etc. shall be re-contoured if necessary, and revegetated to promote restoration of the area to pre-Project conditions. An area subject to "temporary" disturbance means any area that is disturbed during the Project, but after Project completion will not be subject to further disturbance and has the potential to be revegetated. Appropriate methods and plant species used to revegetate such areas should be determined on a site-specific basis in consultation with the USFWS, CDFW, and revegetation experts.
117

12. In the case of trapped animals, escape ramps or structures should be installed immediately to allow the animal(s) to escape, or the USFWS shall be contacted for guidance.

Notification must include the date, time, and location of the incident or of the finding of a dead or injured animal and any other pertinent information. The USFWS contact is the Chief of the Division of Endangered Species, at the addresses and telephone numbers below.

The CDFW contact can be reached at 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A, Rancho Cordova, California 95670, (530) 934-9309.

MM 3.9.1: If prehistoric or historic-era cultural or archaeological materials are encountered during construction activities, all work within 25 feet of the find shall halt until a qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for During
construction
Lead Agency
118
prehistoric and historic archaeologist, can evaluate the significance of the find and make recommendations. Cultural resource materials may include prehistoric resources such as flaked and ground stone tools and debris, shell, bone, ceramics, and fire-affected rock as well as historic resources such as glass, metal, wood, brick, or structural remnants. If the qualified professional archaeologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant cultural resource, additional investigations may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. These additional studies may include avoidance, testing, and evaluation or data recovery excavation.

If the qualified paleontologist determines that the discovery represents a potentially significant paleontological resource, additional investigations and fossil recovery may be required to mitigate adverse impacts from Project implementation. If avoidance is not feasible, the paleontological resources shall be evaluated for their significance. If the resources are not significant, avoidance is not necessary. If the resources are significant, they shall be avoided to ensure no adverse effects, or such effects must be mitigated. Construction in that area shall not resume until the resource appropriate measures are recommended or the materials are determined During
construction
Lead Agency
119
to be less than significant. If the resource is significant and fossil recovery is the identified form of treatment, then the fossil shall be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution. Copies of all correspondence and reports shall be submitted to the Lead Agency.

MM 3.9.3: If human remains are discovered during construction or operational activities, further excavation or disturbance shall be prohibited pursuant to Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. The protocol, guidelines, and channels of communication outlined by the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code (Chapter 1492, Statutes of 1982, Senate Bill 297), and Senate Bill 447 (Chapter 44, Statutes of 1987), shall be followed. Section 7050.5(c) shall guide any potential Native American involvement, in the event of discovery of human remains, at the direction of the county coroner.

During
construction
Lead Agency
MM 3.12.1: Prior to ground-disturbing activities, the City shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that specifies best management practices (BMP), with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving offsite. The SWPPP shall include contain a site map that shows the construction site perimeter, existing and proposed manmade facilities, stormwater collection and discharge points, general topography both before and after construction, and drainage patterns across the Project site. Additionally, the SWPPP shall contain a visual monitoring program and a chemical monitoring program for non-visible pollutants to be implemented (if there is a failure of best management practices). The requirements of the SWPPP and BMPs shall be incorporated into design specifications and construction contracts. Recommended best management practices for the construction phase may include the following:

Prior to
construction
Lead Agency
120
• Stockpiling and disposing of demolition debris, concrete, and soil properly.
• Protecting any existing storm drain inlets and stabilizing disturbed areas.
• Implementing erosion controls.
• Properly managing construction materials.
• Managing waste, aggressively controlling litter, and
implementing sediment controls.
121
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 134.00 Dwelling Unit 20.00 241,200.00 383

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 37

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

2.0 Emissions Summary
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Operational Year 2018
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblLandUse LotAcreage 43.51 20.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 20.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 20.00 0.00
Daily Homes Subdivision
Kings County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
122

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2004 0.0000
Maximum 0.0000
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2004 0.0000
Maximum 0.0000
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
123

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 60.0603
Energy 599.4823
Mobile 2,566.342
5 Waste 69.3401
Water 31.3069
Total 3,326.532
1 Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
124

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
125
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 20 2 Building Construction Building Construction 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 300 3 Demolition Demolition 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 20
4 Grading Grading 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 30
5 Paving Paving 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 20
6 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/5/2004 1/4/2004 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 488,430; Residential Outdoor: 162,810; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
126
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
127

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating 1 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 48.00 14.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
128

3.2 Architectural Coating - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
129

3.3 Building Construction - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
131

3.4 Demolition - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
132

3.4 Demolition - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
133

3.5 Grading - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
134

3.5 Grading - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
135

3.6 Paving - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
136

3.6 Paving - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
137

3.7 Site Preparation - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
139

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Site Preparation - 2004
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
140
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 2,566.342
5 Unmitigated 2,566.342
5 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 1,275.68 1,327.94 1155.08 3,623,370 3,623,370 Total 1,275.68 1,327.94 1,155.08 3,623,370 3,623,370
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 42.30 19.60 38.10 86 11 3

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.472912 0.030922 0.145205 0.141616 0.025886 0.005289 0.012264 0.153809 0.001816 0.002088 0.006227 0.001059 0.000908 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
141
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
368.5390
Electricity
Unmitigated
368.5390
NaturalGas
Mitigated
230.9433
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
230.9433

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

4.30215e
+006
230.9433
Total 230.9433
Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
142

4.30215e
+006
230.9433
Total 230.9433
Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.2619e
+006
368.5390
Total 368.5390
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
143

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 60.0603
Unmitigated 60.0603

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.2619e
+006
368.5390
Total 368.5390
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
144

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000
Hearth 58.3948
Landscaping 1.6655
Total 60.0603
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
145

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000
Hearth 58.3948
Landscaping 1.6655
Total 60.0603
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 25 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
146
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 31.3069
Unmitigated 31.3069

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.73064 /

5.5041

31.3069
Total 31.3069
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 26 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
147

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.73064 /

5.5041

31.3069
Total 31.3069
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 69.3401
Unmitigated 69.3401
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 27 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
148

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
137.88 69.3401
Total 69.3401
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Single Family
Housing
137.88 69.3401
Total 69.3401
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 28 of 29 Date: 5/15/2017 11:05 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
149

11.0 Vegetation

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Single Family Housing 134.00 Dwelling Unit 20.00 241,200.00 383

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
3 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 37

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Operational Year 2019
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
641.35 CH4 Intensity 0.029
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.006
(lb/MWhr)
Daily Homes Subdivision
Kings County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 1 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
151

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 150.00 250.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 150.00 250.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 150.00 250.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 150.00 250.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 43.51 20.00
tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2018 2019
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 20.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 20.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 2 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
152

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2017 255.7931
2018 383.8350
2019 1.4681
Maximum 383.8350
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2017 255.7929
2018 383.8346
2019 1.4681
Maximum 383.8346
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 3 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
153

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 60.0599
Energy 599.4823
Mobile 2,533.221
4 Waste 69.3401
Water 31.3069
Total 3,293.410
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 4 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
154

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.54 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 5 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
155
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/15/2018 1/11/2019 5 20 2 Building Construction Building Construction 9/23/2017 11/16/2018 5 300 3 Demolition Demolition 7/3/2017 7/28/2017 5 20
4 Grading Grading 8/12/2017 9/22/2017 5 30
5 Paving Paving 11/17/2018 12/14/2018 5 20
6 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/29/2017 8/11/2017 5 10 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 488,430; Residential Outdoor: 162,810; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 6 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
156
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 7 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
157

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating 1 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 48.00 14.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 8 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
158

3.2 Architectural Coating - 2018
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 0.3991
Total 0.3991
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000
Off-Road 1.4076
Total 1.4076
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 9 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
159

3.2 Architectural Coating - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000
Off-Road 1.1514
Total 1.1514
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 10 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
160

3.2 Architectural Coating - 2019
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 0.3167
Total 0.3167
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0000
Off-Road 1.1514
Total 1.1514
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 11 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
161

3.3 Building Construction - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 84.6909
Total 84.6909
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 12 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
162

3.3 Building Construction - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 13.6948
Worker 12.6832
Total 26.3780
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 84.6908
Total 84.6908
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 13 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
163

3.3 Building Construction - 2018
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 275.1071
Total 275.1071
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 14 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
164

3.3 Building Construction - 2018
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 44.8057
Worker 40.0535
Total 84.8592
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 275.1068
Total 275.1068
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 15 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
165

3.4 Demolition - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 35.8438
Total 35.8438
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 16 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
166

3.4 Demolition - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 1.1324
Total 1.1324
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 35.8438
Total 35.8438
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 17 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
167

3.5 Grading - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000
Off-Road 87.0011
Total 87.0011
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 18 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
168

3.5 Grading - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 2.2649
Total 2.2649
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000
Off-Road 87.0010
Total 87.0010
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 19 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
169

3.6 Paving - 2018
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 20.9736
Paving 0.0000
Total 20.9736
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 20 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
170

3.6 Paving - 2018
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 1.0884
Total 1.0884
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 20.9736
Paving 0.0000
Total 20.9736
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 21 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
171

3.7 Site Preparation - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000
Off-Road 17.8025
Total 17.8025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 22 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
172

3.7 Site Preparation - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 0.6795
Total 0.6795
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000
Off-Road 17.8025
Total 17.8025
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 23 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
173

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
Increase Density
Improve Walkability Design
Improve Destination Accessibility
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Pedestrian Network

3.7 Site Preparation - 2017
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000
Worker 0.6795
Total 0.6795
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 24 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
174
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1,198.235
3 Unmitigated 2,533.221
4 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Single Family Housing 1,275.68 1,327.94 1155.08 3,623,370 1,251,182 Total 1,275.68 1,327.94 1,155.08 3,623,370 1,251,182
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 42.30 19.60 38.10 86 11 3

5.0 Energy Detail

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Single Family Housing 0.480541 0.029898 0.145962 0.133853 0.023791 0.005025 0.012238 0.156969 0.001786 0.002002 0.006069 0.001023 0.000844 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 25 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
175
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
368.5390
Electricity
Unmitigated
368.5390
NaturalGas
Mitigated
230.9433
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
230.9433

4.30215e
+006
230.9433
Total 230.9433
Unmitigated

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 26 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
176

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

4.30215e
+006
230.9433
Total 230.9433
Mitigated

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.2619e
+006
368.5390
Total 368.5390
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 27 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
177

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

1.2619e
+006
368.5390
Total 368.5390
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 28 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
178

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000
Hearth 58.3948
Landscaping 1.6651
Total 60.0599
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 29 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
179

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.0000
Hearth 58.3948
Landscaping 1.6651
Total 60.0599
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 30 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
180
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 31.3069
Unmitigated 31.3069

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.73064 /

5.5041

31.3069
Total 31.3069
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 31 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
181

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Single Family
Housing

8.73064 /

5.5041

31.3069
Total 31.3069
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 69.3401
Unmitigated 69.3401
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 32 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
182

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 33 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
183

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.1 Page 34 of 34 Date: 5/15/2017 11:27 AM Daily Homes Subdivision - Kings County, Annual
184
Notice of Exemption
TO: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk
County of Kings
Kings County Government Center
Hanford, California 93230
FROM: City of Lemoore Community Development Dept.
711 W. Cinnamon Drive
Lemoore, CA 93245
PROJECT TITLE: Zoning Map Amendment No. 2021-05 and
General Plan Amendment No. 2021-03
PROJECT APPLICANT: Daley Homes
PROJECT LOCATION – City: Lemoore County: Kings
PROJECT LOCATION – Specific: Northeast Corner of State Route 198 and State Route 41, South of San Simeon Drive and West of Acrata Avenue (APN 023-320-005 Remainder) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes Zoning Map Amendments and General Plan Amendments for an undeveloped 7.09 acre site. Roughly three quarters of the site currently designated and zoned Low Density Residential (RLD) would be designated and zoned Low-Medium Density Residential (RLMD). The remaining future lots to the north (approximately one-quarter of the site) would be designated and zoned Low Density Residetntial (RLD). The proposed General Plan Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments primarily result in increasing the residential capacity on the site, from approximately 23 residential units to approximately 53 residential units, resulting in a net increase of 30 residential units on the site. As such, the City has complied with Government Code section 66300. Further, the increased residential capacity may be available to offset any decrease in residential capacity resulting from future projects.

NAME OF PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVING PROJECT: City of Lemoore NAME, ADDRESS, & PHONE NUMBER OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT:

Daley Enterprises, Inc. 1356 E. Tulare Avenue, Tulare, CA 93274 (559) 686-1761 or 4Creeks, Inc. 324 S.

Santa Fe Street, Visalia, CA 93292 (559) 802-3052
EXEMPT STATUS: (check one)
Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number:

Statutory Exemptions. State code number: CEQA Guidelines Section 15382 “Significant 185
Effect on the Environment” means a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance.

REASONS WHY PROJECT IS EXEMPT: An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared in May 2017 at the time the site was originally designated. The Initial Study found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project in the form of mitigations have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the City, and is attached for review.

LEAD AGENCY CONTACT PERSON:

Kristie Baley, Management Analyst
(559) 924-6744 Ext. 740 Signature Date
Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code.

Reference: Sections 21068, 21083, 21100 and 21151, Public Resources Code; Hecton v. People of the State of California, 58 Cal. App. 3d 653.

Findings:

1. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest and the General Plan, as amended, will remain internally consistent.

2. The Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs.

3. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment are consistent with the adopted 2017 IS/MND will not have a significant effect on the environment under CEQA.

4. The General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment comply with Government Code section 66300 by increasing residential capacity by up to 30 residential units and the City may rely on this increased capacity for future projects to ensure no net loss in residential capacity. 186
January 25, 2022
Mr. Steve Brandt, AICP
City Planner
City of Lemoore
711 W. Cinnamon Drive
Lemoore, CA 92345
Subject: Trip Generation Comparison for Silva Estates 11 Phase 3 Dear Mr. Brandt,
4Creeks, Inc. is pleased to provide this trip generation analysis for the proposed Silva Estates 11 Phase 3 project. This analysis compares the estimated trips generated for the proposed project as planned with both multifamily and single-family housing, to the traffic volumes generated if the project included singlefamily housing only.

The project area is 7.09 acres of vacant land adjacent to the northeast quadrant of the State Route 198/State Route 41 interchange. The project as planned is a 23-lot multifamily and single-family subdivision which includes 45 multifamily housing units and eight (8) single-family detached housing units. In comparison, if the project included single-family detached housing only, it would have 23 units.

Trip Generation
Estimated trip generation was determined for daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour for the proposed project, as well as the comparison project. The estimated trip generation for each was based on published trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021. 4Creeks used trip generation rates for the ITE land uses Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE Code 210) and Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (ITE Code 220).

Table 1 shows the trips generated for the proposed project as planned with both multifamily and singlefamily housing. The proposed project is expected to generate approximately 463 daily trips, including 44 AM peak hour trips (10 inbound, 34 outbound) and 49 PM peak hour trips (31 inbound, 18 outbound).

TABLE 1: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use (Code) Units
Rate*TripsRate*% In:OutInOutTotalRate*% In:OutInOutTotal Single-Family
Detached Housing
(210)
8 12.38 99 0.88 26:74 1 6 7 1.13 63:37 6 3 9
Multifamily Housing
(Low-Rise) (220) 45 8.09 364 0.82 24:76 9 28 37 0.89 63:37 25 15 40 Total Trips 463 10 34 44 31 18 49
*Regression equations used based on procedure in Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, September 2017 187
Mr. Steve Brandt, AICP Page 2 of 2
January 25, 2022
324 S. Santa Fe, Suite A
Visalia, California 93292
www.4-creeks.com
Table 2 shows the trips generated for the comparison project which would include single-family detached housing only. The comparison project is expected to generate approximately 261 daily trips, including 20 AM peak hour trips (5 inbound, 15 outbound) and 25 PM peak hour trips (16 inbound, 9 outbound).

TABLE 2: COMPARISON PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use (Code) Units
Rate*TripsRate*% In:OutInOutTotalRate*% In:OutInOutTotal Single-Family
Detached Housing
(210)
23 11.35 261 0.87 26:74 5 15 20 1.09 63:37 16 9 25
Total Trips 261 5 15 20 16 9 25
*Regression equations used based on procedure in Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, September 2017 The proposed project, including both multifamily and single-family housing, generates 202 daily trips, 24 AM peak hour, and 24 PM peak hour trips more than if the project included single-family housing only.

As such, the proposed project does not result in a significant increase in project trips over a project which includes single-family housing only. In addition, in reviewing adjacent intersections; vehicle queues and delay times will not be impacted in a significant way due to the increase of trips from the project as proposed.

Should you have any questions or if 4Creeks can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call me at (559) 802-3052.

Sincerely,
Lisa M. Wallis-Dutra, PE, TE, PTOE, RSP1
Sr. Traffic Engineer
Cc: Matt Ainley
188

City of

LEMOORE

CALIFORNIA
711 West Cinnamon Drive  Lemoore, California 93245  (559) 924-6744 Staff Report

To: Lemoore City Council
From: Marisa Avalos, City Clerk
Date: January 21, 2022 Meeting Date: February 1, 2022
Subject: Activity Update
Strategic
Initiative:
☐ Safe & Vibrant Community
☐ Fiscally Sound Government
☐ Community & Neighborhood
L Livability
☐ Growing & Dynamic Economy
☐ Operational Excellence
☒ Not Applicable
Reports
 Warrant Register – FY 21/22 January 14, 2022
 Warrant Register – FY 21/22 January 21, 2022
189
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4215 - FINANCE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12939 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 26.56 .00 SHRED-FINANCE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11162 -01 12942 7278 TYLER TECHNOLOGI 3,840.00 -3,840.00 APPLICATION SERVICES/FEES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 3,866.56 -3,840.00
TOTAL FINANCE .00 3,866.56 -3,840.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING Warrant Register 1-14-2022
190
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4216 - PLANNING

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11273 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 2,766.60 -2,766.60 PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMEN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11273 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 2,660.00 -2,660.00 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 5,426.60 -5,426.60
TOTAL PLANNING .00 5,426.60 -5,426.60
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 191
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4220 - MAINTENANCE DIVISION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP -67.54 .00 PAID TO THE WRONG VEN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 5.67 .00 3/8MIPXMPT HEX NIPPLE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 36.97 .00 EZ20 18LB JNT COMPOUN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 55.17 .00 5GAL POURING SPOUT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 53.57 .00 QT DRYDEX SPACKLING 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 70.73 .00 6PK LIQ ANT BAIT/BORA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 270.66 .00 6PC FLUTED SCREW SET 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 330.76 .00 75PC HD UTIL BLADE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 82.87 .00 1/2X1/2X16POLYCONNECT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 128.69 .00 4GAL BACKPACK SPRAYER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12871 3004 2003 WEST HUG AN 143.61 .00 BRZ INGE PIN DR STOP TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 1,111.16 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 160.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-657 FOX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 165.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-721 CINN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 110.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-210 FOX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 90.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-435 C ST 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 69.25 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK/TO 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 75.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-711 CINN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 79.50 .00 MATT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 80.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-41 CINNA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 46.10 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK/TO 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 46.10 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK/TO 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 46.10 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK/TO 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12873 1259 ADVANCED PEST CO 50.00 .00 PEST CONTROL-711 CINN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM -17.16 .00 UNIFORM TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 999.89 .00
4350 REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12913 1263 KINGS COUNTY MOB 284.52 .00 KEYS TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES .00 284.52 .00
TOTAL MAINTENANCE DIVISION .00 2,395.57 .00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 192
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4221 - POLICE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10894 -01 12906 5814 CITY OF HANFORD 16,343.93 -16,343.93 DISPATCH SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 16,343.93 -16,343.93 4320 MEETINGS & DUES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11271 -01 12936 2815 SEQUOIA COUNCIL 2,175.00 -2,175.00 POST RECHARTER FOR 2022 ( 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11271 -02 12936 2815 SEQUOIA COUNCIL 75.00 -75.00 RECHARTER FEE TOTAL MEETINGS & DUES .00 2,250.00 -2,250.00
4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12897 6685 DIRECTV 95.99 .00 01/04/22-02/03/22 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 95.99 .00
4360 TRAINING
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12879 T2034 ROGELIO AVELAR 42.00 .00 PERISHABLE SKILLS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12910 7092 KATARINA ESCOBAR 42.00 .00 PERISHABLE SKILLS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12947 T2239 WILLIAM JASON ST 42.00 .00 PERSHABLE SKILLS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12931 T385 MARK PESCATORE 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12921 6286 OSVALDO MALDONAD 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12927 6089 JONATHAN MORITZ 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12935 T061 STEVEN ROSSI 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12941 7024 ERIC TREVINO 14.00 .00 FIRS AID/CPR/AED UPDA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12944 7225 RAYMUNDO VALENCI 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12886 6835 BRETT WARD 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12889 T2574 CHASE ELLSWORTH 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12911 7092 KATARINA ESCOBAR 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12923 2512 MATHEW GONSALVES 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12874 6285 ANTHONY BRALY 14.00 .00 FIRST AID/CPR/AED UPD TOTAL TRAINING .00 280.00 .00
4380 RENTALS & LEASES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12887 1817 C.A. REDING COMP 251.10 .00 02/01/22-04/30/22 TOTAL RENTALS & LEASES .00 251.10 .00
TOTAL POLICE .00 19,221.02 -18,593.93
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 193
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4222 - FIRE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12920 0313 LEMOORE VOLUNTEE 641.80 .00 RESTOCK ITEMS TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 641.80 .00
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 50.09 .00 BLK CABLE TIE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 13.17 .00 250W IVY MED LAMPHOLD 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 34.50 .00 GE 45W REVEAL REFL BU TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 97.76 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 44.98 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK/MOP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 44.98 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK/MOP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10901 -01 12906 5814 CITY OF HANFORD 12,257.95 -12,257.95 LEMOORE FIRE MONTHLY DISP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 111.09 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK/MOP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 111.09 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK/MOP TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 12,570.09 -12,257.95 TOTAL FIRE .00 13,309.65 -12,257.95
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 194
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4224 - BUILDING INSPECTION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11013 -01 12908 6713 INTERWEST CONSUL 945.00 -945.00 PLAN CHECK BLANKET PO TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 945.00 -945.00
TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTION .00 945.00 -945.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 195
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4230 - PUBLIC WORKS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 862.92 -862.92 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 874.17 -874.17 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 1,067.49 -1,067.49 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 1,182.24 -1,182.24 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 1,436.22 -1,436.22 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 2,310.30 -2,310.30 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11042 -02 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 2,418.39 -2,418.39 CHANGE ORDER 1-INCREASED 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11115 -02 12882 6733 BLACKBURN CONSUL 13,441.50 -13,441.50 CHANGE ORDER 1- INCREASE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 23,593.23 -23,593.23 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS .00 23,593.23 -23,593.23
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 196
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4231 - STREETS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10932 -02 12940 5306 T&T PAVEMENT MAR 1,188.03 -1,188.03 CHANGE ORDER 1 - ADD FUND TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 1,188.03 -1,188.03
TOTAL STREETS .00 1,188.03 -1,188.03
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 197
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4241 - PARKS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 12.85 .00 MR LG MENS LTHR GLOVE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 46.33 .00 NUTS & BOLTS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 34.51 .00 MPBTR 4X3/8 COVER/FRA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 32.26 .00 3/4" OVAL TREAD BODY 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 25.71 .00 12OZ WHT GLS PAINT TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 151.66 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11012 -01 12891 6459 CLEAN CUT LANDSC 11,235.08 -11,235.08 YEARLY PARKS MAINTENANCE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 11,235.08 -11,235.08 TOTAL PARKS .00 11,386.74 -11,235.08
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 198
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4242 - RECREATION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12872 2914 AAA QUALITY SERV 469.75 .00 CHRISTMAS PARADE 2021 TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 469.75 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12878 5500 ASCAP 390.00 .00 RENEWAL LICENSE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 390.00 .00
TOTAL RECREATION .00 859.75 .00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 199
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 11
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4296 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12930 7070 PANTERRA NETWORK 1,553.55 .00 12/01/21-01/31/22 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 1,553.55 .00
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .00 1,553.55 .00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 200
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 12
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4297 - HUMAN RESOURCES

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10895 -01 12883 2836 THE BODY SHOP HE 200.00 -200.00 MONTHLY MEMBERSHIPS FOR E 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11050 -01 12894 7265 COMPUTER SYSTEMS 400.00 -400.00 FILE SHARING SOFTWARE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11089 -01 12898 6115 EMPLOYEE RELATIO 179.34 -179.34 NEW HIRE BACKGROUNDS/DRUG 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11161 -01 12914 6543 KINGS INDUSTRIAL 190.00 -190.00 HR REQUIRED TESTING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 969.34 -969.34
TOTAL HUMAN RESOURCES .00 969.34 -969.34
TOTAL GENERAL FUND .00 84,715.04 -78,049.16
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 201
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 13
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 036 - SB1 FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 5018 - 2020 SLURRY SB1 PROJECT

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11047 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 18,291.00 -18,291.00 SB 1 PROJECT TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 18,291.00 -18,291.00 TOTAL 2020 SLURRY SB1 PROJECT .00 18,291.00 -18,291.00
TOTAL SB1 FUND .00 18,291.00 -18,291.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 202
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 14
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 040 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
BUDGET UNIT - 4265 - FLEET MAINTENANCE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10902 -02 12903 0068 GARY V. BURROWS, 1,445.72 -1,445.72 CHANGE ORDER 1- ADD FUNDS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10912 -01 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE -6.45 6.45 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10912 -01 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 8.56 -8.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10912 -01 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 27.85 -27.85 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10912 -01 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 52.02 -52.02 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11247 -01 12896 7025 DIESEL LAPTOPS, 1,500.00 -1,500.00 TEXA CAR SOFTWARE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12928 6120 O'REILLY AUTO PA -7.43 .00 OCTOBER CREDIT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12912 2990 KIMBALL-MIDWEST 143.28 .00 WHEEL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12926 0345 MORGAN & SLATES, 253.49 .00 DURASIN 2018W/L GLOVE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 77.09 .00 GLASS CLEANER- 19OZ 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 90.11 .00 CLAMP/FLEX TUBING 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 56.36 .00 WORK LIGHT/AAA BATTER TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 3,640.60 -3,027.70
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 65.19 .00 HYDRAULIC HOSE-BULK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 37.18 .00 CONVEX MIRROR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 19.24 .00 ENGINE MOUNT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 21.39 .00 CAIN AIR FILTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 22.18 .00 OIL/AIR FILTERS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 22.50 .00 BEAM 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12905 6146 HANFORD CHRYSLER 18.54 .00 AC SENSOR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 31.63 .00 ALARM 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12905 6146 HANFORD CHRYSLER 28.60 .00 AB SENSOR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 30.04 .00 LENS/LAMP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12905 6146 HANFORD CHRYSLER 74.79 .00 AG HOSE RADI 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12928 6120 O'REILLY AUTO PA 180.13 .00 BATTERY 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12880 1908 BATTERY SYSTEMS, 151.04 .00 BATTERY 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12926 0345 MORGAN & SLATES, 157.38 .00 HR FLAT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 196.43 .00 AIR FILTERS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 198.42 .00 AIR FILTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12926 0345 MORGAN & SLATES, 353.30 .00 HR SQ TUBE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12880 1908 BATTERY SYSTEMS, 451.65 .00 BATTERY 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 330.09 .00 NEW GRIPPER KIT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10902 -01 12903 0068 GARY V. BURROWS, 243.14 -243.14 OIL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE -94.91 .00 PAID TO THE WRONG VEN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 7.58 .00 LENS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 14.77 .00 FUEL CAP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 6.34 .00 OIL FITLER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 6.34 .00 OIL FILTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 6.34 .00 OIL FILTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 6.34 .00 OIL FILTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 8.79 .00 LAMP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12905 6146 HANFORD CHRYSLER -18.54 .00 AC SENSOR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 3.21 .00 GALLON WATER TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 2,579.12 -243.14
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 203
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 15
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 040 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
BUDGET UNIT - 4265 - FLEET MAINTENANCE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES (cont'd)
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11275 -01 12924 7030 MITCHELL 1 2,448.00 -2,448.00 PRODEMAND SUBSCRIPTION 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11246 -01 12896 7025 DIESEL LAPTOPS, 1,195.00 -1,195.00 TEXA TRUCK ANNUAL SUPPORT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 68.71 .00 UNIFORM/MOP/GLOVE/MAS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 62.21 .00 UNIFORM/MOP/GLOVE/MAS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 55.71 .00 UNIFORM/MOP/GLOVE/MAS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 55.71 .00 UNIFORM/MOP/GLOVE/MAS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 3,885.34 -3,643.00
4350 REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE -89.95 89.95 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 25.00 -25.00 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 25.00 -25.00 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 172.67 -172.67 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 218.22 -218.22 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 459.18 -459.18 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 650.35 -650.35 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 674.67 -674.67 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 918.36 -918.36 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10910 -01 12881 0056 BILLINGSLEY TIRE 1,926.04 -1,926.04 TIRE REPAIR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11003 -02 12934 6323 QUINN COMPANY 1,033.24 -1,033.24 CHANGE ORDER -1 PO INCREA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11003 -02 12934 6323 QUINN COMPANY 1,587.95 -1,587.95 CHANGE ORDER -1 PO INCREA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11003 -02 12934 6323 QUINN COMPANY 1,603.38 -1,603.38 CHANGE ORDER -1 PO INCREA 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11003 -02 12934 6323 QUINN COMPANY 2,826.27 -2,826.27 CHANGE ORDER -1 PO INCREA TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES .00 12,030.38 -12,030.38
TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE .00 22,135.44 -18,944.22
TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE .00 22,135.44 -18,944.22
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 204
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 16
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 041 - RMA - INT GOVT SVC
BUDGET UNIT - 4742 - RISK MANAGEMENT

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10891 -01 12895 0123 CSJVRMA 248,664.00 -248,664.00 RISK MANAGEMENT INSURANCE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 248,664.00 -248,664.00 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT .00 248,664.00 -248,664.00
TOTAL RMA - INT GOVT SVC .00 248,664.00 -248,664.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 205
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 17
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 050 - WATER
BUDGET UNIT - 4250 - WATER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 27.87 .00 300PSI WTR TEST GAUGE TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 27.87 .00
4220CH CHLORINE OPERATING SUPPLY
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10972 -02 12943 6058 UNIVAR 784.06 -784.06 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10972 -02 12943 6058 UNIVAR 1,031.61 -1,031.61 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10972 -02 12943 6058 UNIVAR 1,183.49 -1,183.49 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10972 -02 12943 6058 UNIVAR 1,257.46 -1,257.46 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10972 -02 12943 6058 UNIVAR 1,260.42 -1,260.42 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE TOTAL CHLORINE OPERATING SUPPLY .00 5,517.04 -5,517.04
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11218 -01 12875 7208 AQUA-METRIC SALE 8,385.00 -8,385.00 1' IPERL TR/PL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11218 -02 12875 7208 AQUA-METRIC SALE 607.91 -607.91 SALES TAX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11240 -01 12907 6909 HOPKINS TECHNICA 821.07 -821.07 SPARE MEMBRANE CAPS (2EA) 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11240 -02 12907 6909 HOPKINS TECHNICA 29.00 -50.00 EST. SHIPPING 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11240 -03 12907 6909 HOPKINS TECHNICA 59.53 -38.53 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 5.01 .00 NUTS & BOLTS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 5.35 .00 TAPE ASSORTMENT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 3.21 .00 16OZ BOTTLE SPRAYER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 3.21 .00 16OZ BOTTLE SPRAYER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 9.21 .00 CLEANER/DEGREASER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 11.79 .00 6PK MR CARMIN SOFT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 12.63 .00 MAX 4PK AA ALK BATTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 12.76 .00 VENOM PTFE THREAD TAP 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 6.96 .00 WD40 12OZ MP LUBRICAN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 15.41 .00 32OZ PRO SPRAYER BOTT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 15.41 .00 32OZ PRO SPRAYER BOTT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 8.02 .00 CARQUEST BUCKET 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 8.03 .00 WASHER FLUID BUG 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 32.15 .00 RAID14.5OZ ROACH KILL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 35.57 .00 SHOP TOWEL-BOX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 31.08 .00 FUEL HOSES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 26.76 .00 SAFETY MASKS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 25.48 .00 GORILLA TAPE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 27.85 .00 HOT SHINE TIRE COAT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 18.43 .00 CLEANER/DEGREASER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 18.43 .00 CLEANER/DEGREASER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 17.15 .00 GT 4" BRS TWIST NOZZL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 60.69 .00 MP1/4X3/8X100PVC TUBI 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 53.58 .00 WP 96" 60W CW FLO TUB 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 54.39 .00 HOT RIM ALL WHL CLNR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 34.18 .00 90 TOWEL CANISTER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 43.43 .00 MISC. MDSE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 46.39 .00 1/4PT THRD SEALANT 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 49.94 .00 WD 40 14.4OZ LUBRICAN RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 206
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 18
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 050 - WATER
BUDGET UNIT - 4250 - WATER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES (cont'd)
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 272.39 .00 TOW AND STOW HITCH 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 193.95 .00 MP BTR 5GAL PAINT MIX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 71.22 .00 GE2F96T12 BALLAST 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 76.13 .00 8-1/4" HEDGE SHEARS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 76.71 .00 MT4X15 PBCANV DROPCL TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 11,285.41 -9,902.51
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 108.00 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 69.00 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 69.00 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 69.00 .00 UNIFORM/GLOVE/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11173 -01 12915 6795 LABOR TIME 1,423.36 -1,423.36 LABOR TIME 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11173 -01 12915 6795 LABOR TIME 1,779.20 -1,779.20 LABOR TIME 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10905 -01 12906 5814 CITY OF HANFORD 4,085.98 -4,085.98 WATER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11045 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 1,625.00 -1,625.00 DIF WATER PORTION TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 9,228.54 -8,913.54
4320 MEETINGS & DUES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11279 -01 12938 3040 SWRCB 8,340.00 -8,340.00 CONNECTION 0-1,000 ($8.34 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11279 -02 12938 3040 SWRCB 19,480.00 -19,480.00 CONNECTION 1,001-5,000 ($ 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11279 -03 12938 3040 SWRCB 6,221.64 -6,221.64 CONNECTION 5,001-15,000 ( 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11279 -04 LW-1034262 3040 SWRCB .00 -3,404.16 LATE FEE (10% PENALTY IF TOTAL MEETINGS & DUES .00 34,041.64 -37,445.80
4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12893 7058 COMCAST 194.69 .00 12/25/21-01/24/22 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12937 0423 SOCALGAS 130.10 .00 11/22/21-12/22/21 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12932 0363 PG&E 11,239.87 .00 11/16/21-12/15/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 11,564.66 .00
4380 RENTALS & LEASES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10971 -03 12922 7175 MATHESON TRI-GAS 1,045.00 -1,045.00 STA7 - LIQUID OXYGEN TANK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10971 -04 12922 7175 MATHESON TRI-GAS 1,045.00 -1,045.00 STA11 - LIQUID OXYGEN TAN TOTAL RENTALS & LEASES .00 2,090.00 -2,090.00
TOTAL WATER .00 73,755.16 -63,868.89
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 207
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 19
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 050 - WATER
BUDGET UNIT - 4251 - UTILITY OFFICE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12939 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 26.56 .00 SHRED-FINANCE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 26.56 .00
TOTAL UTILITY OFFICE .00 26.56 .00
TOTAL WATER .00 73,781.72 -63,868.89
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 208
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 20
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 052 - WATER INCIDENT FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4752 - WATER INCIDENT

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11157 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 2,444.07 -2,444.07 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TANK 7 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 2,444.07 -2,444.07
TOTAL WATER INCIDENT .00 2,444.07 -2,444.07
TOTAL WATER INCIDENT FUND .00 2,444.07 -2,444.07
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 209
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 21
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 056 - REFUSE
BUDGET UNIT - 4256 - REFUSE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10905 -02 12906 5814 CITY OF HANFORD 4,085.98 -4,085.98 REFUSE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 70.85 .00 UNIFORM/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 70.85 .00 UNIFORM/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 122.37 .00 UNIFORM/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 141.97 .00 UNIFORM/MASK TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 4,492.02 -4,085.98
TOTAL REFUSE .00 4,492.02 -4,085.98
TOTAL REFUSE .00 4,492.02 -4,085.98
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 210
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 22
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 4260 - SEWER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12888 7205 CENCAL AUTO & TR 132.98 .00 BO CABLE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 111.49 .00 5GAL YEL DIESEL CAN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12901 6751 FURTADO WELDING 148.01 .00 DRILL BIT SET 1/16-1/ 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 84.71 .00 16T BOW RAKE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 73.97 .00 MAX 8PK C ALK BATTERY 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12899 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 44.25 .00 CCW-03-M WTRPRF PR 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 26.44 .00 CLEVIS 5/8" 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 18.21 .00 7.5X16X1KNE PAD CUSHI 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12899 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 18.59 .00 GLOVES 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 27.38 .00 SPADE TERIMINAL 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 31.09 .00 GT BOW RAKE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 29.88 .00 GT5/8" FEM HOSE MENDE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 32.99 .00 3/8X4 GALV NIPPLE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 31.70 .00 RV/MARIN HOSE 1/2"X2' 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE -4.29 .00 1/4"NPTM T COUPLER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE .56 .00 NUTS & BOLTS 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 2.46 .00 TG 4PK 7/5" ALM BUMPE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12916 0314 LEMOORE AUTO SUP 4.70 .00 HOSE CLAMP TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 815.12 .00
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12919 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 16.09 .00 MIDWEST FASTNER PK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12902 2410 GAR BENNETT, LLC 14.56 .00 FFGASKET FIBER FILLED TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 30.65 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 10905 -03 12906 5814 CITY OF HANFORD 4,085.98 -4,085.98 SEWER 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10939 -01 12925 6245 MOORE TWINING AS 45.00 -45.00 ANALYTICAL TESTING WWTP S 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10939 -01 12925 6245 MOORE TWINING AS 45.00 -45.00 ANALYTICAL TESTING WWTP S 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10939 -01 12925 6245 MOORE TWINING AS 45.00 -45.00 ANALYTICAL TESTING WWTP S 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10939 -01 12925 6245 MOORE TWINING AS 145.00 -145.00 ANALYTICAL TESTING WWTP S 7 /22 01/14/22 21 10939 -01 12925 6245 MOORE TWINING AS 170.00 -170.00 ANALYTICAL TESTING WWTP S 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 50.88 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 55.81 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 104.39 .00 UNIFORM/MATT/MASK 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12877 2653 ARAMARK UNIFORM 326.31 .00 UNIFORM/MASK TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 5,073.37 -4,535.98
4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12932 0363 PG&E 13.58 .00 11/17/21-12/16/21 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12932 0363 PG&E 24.64 .00 11/17/21-12/16/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 38.22 .00
4350 REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12909 0242 JORGENSEN COMPAN 95.00 .00 INSPECTION SAFETY EQU 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -01 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC -1,927.62 1,927.62 254TC 230/460 VOLT TECO M RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 211
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 23
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 4260 - SEWER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4350 REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES (cont'd)
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -01 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 2,362.10 -2,362.10 254TC 230/460 VOLT TECO M 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -01 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 1,927.62 -1,759.88 254TC 230/460 VOLT TECO M 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -02 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 233.00 -233.00 FREIGHT COST 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -02 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 164.18 -730.81 FREIGHT COST 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -03 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC -147.46 147.46 TAX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -03 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 220.58 -220.58 TAX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -03 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 177.80 -8.80 TAX 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -04 12885 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC 192.76 -192.76 CHANGE ORDER 1-RE-STOCKIN 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11185 -04 26003 7023 BRECK'S ELECTRIC .00 -194.52 CHANGE ORDER 1-RE-STOCKIN TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES .00 3,297.96 -3,627.37
4360 TRAINING
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11280 -01 12884 5140 BOGIE'S PUMP SYS 2,000.00 -2,000.00 GORMAN-RUPP PUMP FUNDAMEN TOTAL TRAINING .00 2,000.00 -2,000.00
TOTAL SEWER .00 11,255.32 -10,163.35
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 212
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 24
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 5310 - SEWER LIFT STATION 9A

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11046 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 1,943.70 -1,943.70 SEWER LIFT STATION 9A TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 1,943.70 -1,943.70
TOTAL SEWER LIFT STATION 9A .00 1,943.70 -1,943.70
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 213
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 25
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 5502 - STORM DRAIN BELLHAVEN/COL

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11072 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 6,707.10 -6,707.10 FOX DITCH ENGINEERING TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 6,707.10 -6,707.10
TOTAL STORM DRAIN BELLHAVEN/COL .00 6,707.10 -6,707.10
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 214
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 26
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 5508 - ENTERPRISE DR DRAINAGE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11277 -01 12933 0876 QUAD KNOPF, INC. 26,700.00 -26,700.00 PHASED DRAINAGE ENGINEERI TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 26,700.00 -26,700.00 TOTAL ENTERPRISE DR DRAINAGE .00 26,700.00 -26,700.00
TOTAL SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE .00 46,606.12 -45,514.15 RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 215
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 27
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 085 - PBIA
BUDGET UNIT - 4270 - PBIA

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12929 5563 RUSTY DEROUIN 300.00 .00 DECEMBER SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 300.00 .00
4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12890 2320 CITY OF LEMOORE 51.00 .00 11/01/21-12/01/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 51.00 .00
TOTAL PBIA .00 351.00 .00
TOTAL PBIA .00 351.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 216
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 28
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 201 - LLMD ZONE 1
BUDGET UNIT - 4851 - LLMD ZONE 1 WESTFIELD

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11032 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 3,583.00 -3,583.00 LLMD 01 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 3,583.00 -3,583.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 1 WESTFIELD .00 3,583.00 -3,583.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 1 .00 3,583.00 -3,583.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 217
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 29
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 203 - LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES
BUDGET UNIT - 4853 - LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11031 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 452.00 -452.00 LLMD 03 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 452.00 -452.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES .00 452.00 -452.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES .00 452.00 -452.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 218
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 30
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 205 - LLMD ZONE 5 WILDFLOWER
BUDGET UNIT - 4855 - LLMD ZONE 5 WILDFLOWER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11030 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 75.00 -75.00 LLMD ZONE 05 MONTHLY LAND TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 75.00 -75.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 5 WILDFLOWER .00 75.00 -75.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 5 WILDFLOWER .00 75.00 -75.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 219
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 31
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 206 - LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO
BUDGET UNIT - 4856 - LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11029 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 81.00 -81.00 50% LLMD 06 MONTHLY LANDS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 81.00 -81.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO .00 81.00 -81.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO .00 81.00 -81.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 220
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 32
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 207 - LLMD ZONE 7 SILVERADO
BUDGET UNIT - 4857 - LLMD ZONE 7 SILVERADO

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11028 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 291.00 -291.00 LLMD 07 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 291.00 -291.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 7 SILVERADO .00 291.00 -291.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 7 SILVERADO .00 291.00 -291.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 221
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 33
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 208A - LLMD ZONE 8 COUNTRY CLUB
BUDGET UNIT - 4858A - LLMD ZONE 8 COUNTRY CLUB

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11027 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 412.00 -412.00 LLMD 08A MONTHLY LANDSCAP TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 412.00 -412.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8 COUNTRY CLUB .00 412.00 -412.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8 COUNTRY CLUB .00 412.00 -412.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 222
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 34
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 208B - LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS
BUDGET UNIT - 4858B - LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11026 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 434.00 -434.00 LLMD 08B MONTHLY LANDSCAP TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 434.00 -434.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS .00 434.00 -434.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS .00 434.00 -434.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 223
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 35
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 209 - LLMD ZONE 9 LA DANTE ROSE
BUDGET UNIT - 4859 - LLMD ZONE 9 LA DANTE ROSE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11025 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 295.00 -295.00 LLMD 09 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 295.00 -295.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 9 LA DANTE ROSE .00 295.00 -295.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 9 LA DANTE ROSE .00 295.00 -295.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 224
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 36
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 210 - LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON
BUDGET UNIT - 4860 - LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11024 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 817.00 -817.00 LLMD 10 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 817.00 -817.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON .00 817.00 -817.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON .00 817.00 -817.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 225
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 37
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 211 - LLMD ZONE 11 SELF HELP EN
BUDGET UNIT - 4861 - LLMD ZONE 11 SELF HELP EN

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11023 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 89.50 -89.50 50% LLMD 11 MONTHLY LANDS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 89.50 -89.50
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 11 SELF HELP EN .00 89.50 -89.50
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 11 SELF HELP EN .00 89.50 -89.50
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 226
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 38
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 212 - LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND
BUDGET UNIT - 4862 - LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11022 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 1,778.00 -1,778.00 LLMD 12 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 1,778.00 -1,778.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND .00 1,778.00 -1,778.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND .00 1,778.00 -1,778.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 227
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 39
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 213 - LLMD ZONE 13 CORNERSTONE
BUDGET UNIT - 4863 - LLMD ZONE 13 CORNERSTONE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11021 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 252.00 -252.00 LLMD 13 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 252.00 -252.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 13 CORNERSTONE .00 252.00 -252.00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 13 CORNERSTONE .00 252.00 -252.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 228
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 40
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 251 - PFMD ZONE 1
BUDGET UNIT - 4871 - PFMD ZONE 1

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11020 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 599.00 -599.00 PFMD 01 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 599.00 -599.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 1 .00 599.00 -599.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 1 .00 599.00 -599.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 229
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 41
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 252 - PFMD ZONE 2
BUDGET UNIT - 4872 - PFMD ZONE 2

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11036 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 1,771.00 -1,771.00 PFMD 02 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 214.54 .00 PFMD ZONE 2 TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 1,985.54 -1,771.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 2 .00 1,985.54 -1,771.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 2 .00 1,985.54 -1,771.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 230
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 42
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 253 - PFMD ZONE 3
BUDGET UNIT - 4873 - PFMD ZONE 3

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11037 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 525.00 -525.00 PFMD 03 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 525.00 -525.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 3 .00 525.00 -525.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 3 .00 525.00 -525.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 231
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 43
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 254 - PFMD ZONE 4
BUDGET UNIT - 4874 - PFMD ZONE 4

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11038 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 439.00 -439.00 PFMD 04 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE 7 /22 01/14/22 21 11272 -01 12892 5276 CLEAN CUT TREE S 3,250.00 -3,250.00 PFMD 04 TREE REMOVAL TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 3,689.00 -3,689.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 4 .00 3,689.00 -3,689.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 4 .00 3,689.00 -3,689.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 232
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 44
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 255 - PFMD ZONE 5
BUDGET UNIT - 4875 - PFMD ZONE 5

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11035 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 634.00 -634.00 PFMD 05 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 634.00 -634.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 5 .00 634.00 -634.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 5 .00 634.00 -634.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 233
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 45
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 256 - PFMD ZONE 6
BUDGET UNIT - 4876 - PFMD ZONE 6

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11253 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 398.00 -398.00 PFMD 06 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 398.00 -398.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 6 .00 398.00 -398.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 6 .00 398.00 -398.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 234
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 46
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 257 - PFMD ZONE 7
BUDGET UNIT - 4877 - PFMD ZONE 7

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11029 -02 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 81.00 -81.00 50% PFMD 07 MONTHLY LANDS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 81.00 -81.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 7 .00 81.00 -81.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 7 .00 81.00 -81.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 235
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 47
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 258 - PFMD ZONE 8
BUDGET UNIT - 4878 - PFMD ZONE 8

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11033 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 557.00 -557.00 PFMD 01 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 557.00 -557.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 8 .00 557.00 -557.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 8 .00 557.00 -557.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 236
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 48
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 259 - PFMD ZONE 9
BUDGET UNIT - 4879 - PFMD ZONE 9

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11034 -01 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 579.00 -579.00 PFMD 09 MONTHLY LANDSCAPE TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 579.00 -579.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 9 .00 579.00 -579.00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 9 .00 579.00 -579.00
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 237
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 49
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 260 - PFMD ZONE 10
BUDGET UNIT - 4880 - PFMD ZONE 10

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11023 -02 12946 7238 WESTSCAPES 89.50 -89.50 50% PFMD 10 MONTHLY LANDS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 89.50 -89.50
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 10 .00 89.50 -89.50
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 10 .00 89.50 -89.50
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 238
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 50
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 16:58:43 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 406 - WASTEWATER CIP
BUDGET UNIT - 5304 - WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAN

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/14/22 21 11091 -01 12904 6965 GLOBAL WATER TEC 50,000.00 -50,000.00 TEST PERIOD - ON SITE EQU TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 50,000.00 -50,000.00 TOTAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLAN .00 50,000.00 -50,000.00 TOTAL WASTEWATER CIP .00 50,000.00 -50,000.00
TOTAL REPORT .00 569,176.95 -547,343.47
RUN DATE 01/14/2022 TIME 16:58:44 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 239
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/14/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT311
TIME: 17:00:49 GENERAL LEDGER TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: account.acct between '2000' and '2999'AND transact.yr='22' and transact.batch='VM011422' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND

ACCOUNT DATE T/C REFERENCE VENDOR/PAYER DEBIT CREDIT DESCRIPTION 2020 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12900 T3214 MICHAELA FINK 250.00 REFUND VETERANS HALL TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE .00 250.00
2300 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
7 /22 01/14/22 21 12900 T3214 MICHAELA FINK 250.00 REFUND VETERANS HALL TOTAL CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 250.00 .00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 250.00 250.00
TOTAL REPORT 250.00 250.00
240
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4213 - CITY MANAGER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 27.00 .00
TOTAL CITY MANAGER .00 27.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING Warrant Register 1-21-2022
241
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 2
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4215 - FINANCE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12975 5396 OFFICE DEPOT 68.91 .00 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 68.91 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11162 -01 12986 7278 TYLER TECHNOLOGI 640.00 -640.00 APPLICATION SERVICES/FEES 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11162 -01 12986 7278 TYLER TECHNOLOGI 3,840.00 -3,840.00 APPLICATION SERVICES/FEES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 4,480.00 -4,480.00
TOTAL FINANCE .00 4,548.91 -4,480.00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 242
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 3
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4216 - PLANNING

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 27.00 .00
TOTAL PLANNING .00 27.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 243
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 4
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4220 - MAINTENANCE DIVISION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 143.61 .00 BRZ HIGE PIN DR STOP 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12959 0521 GRAINGER 47.19 .00 FIRST AID KIT REFILL 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12967 0286 LAWRENCE TRACTOR 479.29 .00 CHAIN LOOP TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 670.09 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 9.00 .00
TOTAL MAINTENANCE DIVISION .00 679.09 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 244
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 5
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4221 - POLICE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12980 0381 QUILL CORP. 47.17 .00 RY22 AAG PLNMO WALL C 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12949 3010 THE ANIMAL HOUSE 42.85 .00 DIAMOND PRO 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12949 3010 THE ANIMAL HOUSE 42.85 .00 DIAMOND DOG FOOD 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12949 3010 THE ANIMAL HOUSE 62.15 .00 NELO ADULT TRIM TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 195.02 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12960 6825 HEALTHWISE SERVI 189.00 .00 SHARPS CONTAINER 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12968 5035 LEMOORE ANIMAL C 40.00 .00 OFFICE VISIT 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12956 2399 DEPARTMENT OF JU 481.00 .00 FINGERPRINTS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11040 -01 12964 0772 COUNTY OF KINGS 3,685.00 -3,685.00 COUNTY OF KINGS INFORMATI 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11152 -01 12963 1250 KINGS CO. SHERIF 46,174.61 -46,174.61 QTR 2 KINGS COUNTY AN TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 50,569.61 -49,859.61 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12950 5048 AT&T MOBILITY 1,226.95 .00 12/03/21-01/02/22 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 1,226.95 .00
4360 TRAINING
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12974 5123 RYAN O'BARR 247.00 .00 INVESTIGATION OF INTE TOTAL TRAINING .00 247.00 .00
4380 RENTALS & LEASES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12953 1817 C.A. REDING COMP 184.82 .00 12/02/21-01/01/22 TOTAL RENTALS & LEASES .00 184.82 .00
TOTAL POLICE .00 52,423.40 -49,859.61
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 245
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 6
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4222 - FIRE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 25.73 .00 BUILDING MAINTANENCE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 57.88 .00 BUILDING MAINTANENCE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 7.49 .00 STATION REPAIR TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 91.10 .00
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 3.83 .00 1" GALV PIP STRAP 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 12.86 .00 TRUCK RESTOCK 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 61.15 .00 MIDWEST FASTNER 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 132.94 .00 RAKES FOR TRUCKS CHAI 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 27.84 .00 TRUCK RESTOCK ITEMS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 34.30 .00 TRUCK RESTOCK SUPPLIE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12969 0304 LEMOORE HARDWARE 36.44 .00 TRUCK RESTOCK TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 309.36 .00
TOTAL FIRE .00 400.46 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 246
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 7
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4224 - BUILDING INSPECTION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 18.00 .00
TOTAL BUILDING INSPECTION .00 18.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 247
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 8
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4230 - PUBLIC WORKS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 27.00 .00
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS .00 27.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 248
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 9
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4241 - PARKS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12976 0363 PG&E 257.67 .00 12/08/21-01/05/22 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 257.67 .00
TOTAL PARKS .00 257.67 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 249
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 10
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4242 - RECREATION

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 3.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 9.00 .00
TOTAL RECREATION .00 9.00 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 250
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 11
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 4296 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12955 4056 COMCAST 2,065.40 .00 01/01/22-01/31/22 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 2,065.40 .00
TOTAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .00 2,065.40 .00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND .00 60,482.93 -54,339.61
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 251
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 12
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 040 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
BUDGET UNIT - 4265 - FLEET MAINTENANCE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11290 -01 12952 6411 BRIDGEPORT MANUF 745.83 -745.83 ELECTRIC JOYSTICK (WITH S 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12951 1908 BATTERY SYSTEMS, 326.18 .00 BATTERY 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12962 2671 KELLER MOTORS 372.09 .00 SL-N-FILTER KIT 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12973 6120 O'REILLY AUTO PA 45.02 .00 CA V SOL CN TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 1,489.12 -745.83
4350 REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12981 0388 REED ELECTRIC, L 130.00 .00 PRESSURE WASHER 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12970 5184 LEMOORE TOWING 230.00 .00 TOWING 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11291 -01 12981 0388 REED ELECTRIC, L 1,787.56 -1,787.56 ELEC MOTOR 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11291 -02 12981 0388 REED ELECTRIC, L 537.00 -537.00 LABOR 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11291 -03 12981 0388 REED ELECTRIC, L 129.60 -129.60 TAX TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SERVICES .00 2,814.16 -2,454.16
TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE .00 4,303.28 -3,199.99
TOTAL FLEET MAINTENANCE .00 4,303.28 -3,199.99
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 252
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 13
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 050 - WATER
BUDGET UNIT - 4250 - WATER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220CH CHLORINE OPERATING SUPPLY
7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 1,004.07 -1,004.07 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 1,035.55 -1,035.55 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 1,133.63 -1,133.63 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 1,245.62 -1,245.62 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 1,654.70 -1,654.70 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10972 -02 12988 6058 UNIVAR 2,151.11 -2,151.11 CHANGE ORDER 1 - INCREASE TOTAL CHLORINE OPERATING SUPPLY .00 8,224.68 -8,224.68
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11286 -01 12983 6613 THE SHERWIN WILL 638.57 -638.57 INVOICE 2128-0 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12958 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 117.64 .00 3/8 ALY CLVS SLP HK 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12958 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 53.19 .00 CCW-03-M WTRPRF PR 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12971 5333 MEDALLION SUPPLY 74.54 .00 SPEED CNTR/6AMPS 120V 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12958 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 15.38 .00 1/2"6600LBSHACKLE 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12958 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 16.52 .00 GLOVES TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 915.84 -638.57
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 9.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11287 -01 12957 6569 ENGIE SERVICES U 45,700.50 -45,700.50 ENGIE WATER SERVICES TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 45,727.50 -45,700.50 TOTAL WATER .00 54,868.02 -54,563.75
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 253
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 14
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 050 - WATER
BUDGET UNIT - 4251 - UTILITY OFFICE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12975 5396 OFFICE DEPOT 7.08 .00 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 7.08 .00
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11015 -01 12961 5546 INFOSEND 2,882.79 -2,882.79 UTILITY BILLING STATEMENT TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 2,882.79 -2,882.79
4335 POSTAGE & MAILING
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11015 -02 12961 5546 INFOSEND 6,013.18 -6,013.18 UTILITY BILLING STATEMENT TOTAL POSTAGE & MAILING .00 6,013.18 -6,013.18
TOTAL UTILITY OFFICE .00 8,903.05 -8,895.97
TOTAL WATER .00 63,771.07 -63,459.72
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 254
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 15
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 056 - REFUSE
BUDGET UNIT - 4256 - REFUSE

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12966 0234 KINGS WASTE AND 275.00 .00 STARBUCKS COMM. RECYC 7 /22 01/20/22 21 10913 -01 12965 0234 KINGS WASTE AND 87,243.48 -87,243.48 TIPPING FEE'S 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 87,536.48 -87,243.48 4330 PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11288 -01 12961 5546 INFOSEND 1,357.36 -1,357.36 REFUSE SCHEDULE TOTAL PRINTING & PUBLICATIONS .00 1,357.36 -1,357.36
TOTAL REFUSE .00 88,893.84 -88,600.84
TOTAL REFUSE .00 88,893.84 -88,600.84
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 255
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 16
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 060 - SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE
BUDGET UNIT - 4260 - SEWER

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4220 OPERATING SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12987 6049 UNISAFE, INC. 364.41 .00 GLOVES 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12958 5866 FASTENAL COMPANY 152.50 .00 22PC LA HEX KEY SET TOTAL OPERATING SUPPLIES .00 516.91 .00
4230 REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12971 5333 MEDALLION SUPPLY 42.49 .00 UNDERGROUND FEEDER 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11292 -01 12972 T1152 NORTHLAND PROCES 393.75 -393.75 MATERIALS TOTAL 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11292 -02 12972 T1152 NORTHLAND PROCES 513.30 -513.30 SHOP LABOR TOTAL 7 /22 01/20/22 21 11292 -03 12972 T1152 NORTHLAND PROCES 65.76 -65.76 TAX TOTAL REPAIR/MAINT SUPPLIES .00 1,015.30 -972.81
4310 PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC
7 /22 01/20/22 21 11287 -02 12957 6569 ENGIE SERVICES U 15,233.50 -15,233.50 ENGIE WASTEWATER SERVICES 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS 7 /22 01/20/22 21 12985 5352 STERICYCLE, INC. 6.00 .00 SHRED-PUBLIC WORKS TOTAL PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT SVC .00 15,251.50 -15,233.50 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12978 0363 PG&E 13,395.68 .00 11/18/21-12/19/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 13,395.68 .00
TOTAL SEWER .00 30,179.39 -16,206.31
TOTAL SEWER& STORM WTR DRAINAGE .00 30,179.39 -16,206.31 RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 256
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 17
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 085 - PBIA
BUDGET UNIT - 4270 - PBIA

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12954 2320 CITY OF LEMOORE 37.28 .00 10/06/21-11/01/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 37.28 .00
TOTAL PBIA .00 37.28 .00
TOTAL PBIA .00 37.28 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 257
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 18
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 201 - LLMD ZONE 1
BUDGET UNIT - 4851 - LLMD ZONE 1 WESTFIELD

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 78.91 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 78.91 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 1 WESTFIELD .00 78.91 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 1 .00 78.91 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 258
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 19
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 203 - LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES
BUDGET UNIT - 4853 - LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 49.32 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 49.32 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES .00 49.32 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 3 SILVA ESTATES .00 49.32 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 259
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 20
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 206 - LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO
BUDGET UNIT - 4856 - LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 9.88 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 9.88 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO .00 9.88 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 6 CAPISTRANO .00 9.88 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 260
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 21
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 208B - LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS
BUDGET UNIT - 4858B - LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 9.86 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 9.86 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS .00 9.86 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 8B GREENS .00 9.86 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 261
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 22
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 210 - LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON
BUDGET UNIT - 4860 - LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 19.72 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 19.72 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON .00 19.72 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 10 AVALON .00 19.72 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 262
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 23
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 212 - LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND
BUDGET UNIT - 4862 - LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 19.73 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 19.73 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND .00 19.73 .00
TOTAL LLMD ZONE 12 SUMMERWIND .00 19.73 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 263
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 24
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 251 - PFMD ZONE 1
BUDGET UNIT - 4871 - PFMD ZONE 1

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 40.70 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 40.70 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 1 .00 40.70 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 1 .00 40.70 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 264
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 25
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 252 - PFMD ZONE 2
BUDGET UNIT - 4872 - PFMD ZONE 2

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 50.15 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 50.15 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 2 .00 50.15 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 2 .00 50.15 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 265
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 26
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 253 - PFMD ZONE 3
BUDGET UNIT - 4873 - PFMD ZONE 3

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 9.86 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 9.86 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 3 .00 9.86 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 3 .00 9.86 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 266
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 27
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 254 - PFMD ZONE 4
BUDGET UNIT - 4874 - PFMD ZONE 4

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 35.08 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 35.08 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 4 .00 35.08 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 4 .00 35.08 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 267
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 28
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 255 - PFMD ZONE 5
BUDGET UNIT - 4875 - PFMD ZONE 5

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 90.29 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 90.29 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 5 .00 90.29 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 5 .00 90.29 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 268
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 29
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT11
TIME: 15:19:06 EXPENDITURE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.fund between '001' and '900' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 259 - PFMD ZONE 9
BUDGET UNIT - 4879 - PFMD ZONE 9

ACCOUNT DATE T/C ENCUMBRANC REFERENCE VENDOR BUDGET EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES DESCRIPTION 4340 UTILITIES
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12977 0363 PG&E 10.11 .00 11/22/21-12/21/21 TOTAL UTILITIES .00 10.11 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 9 .00 10.11 .00
TOTAL PFMD ZONE 9 .00 10.11 .00
TOTAL REPORT .00 248,091.40 -225,806.47
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:19:07 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 269
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT311
TIME: 15:20:42 GENERAL LEDGER TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: account.acct between '1011' and '2021'AND transact.yr='22' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND

ACCOUNT DATE T/C REFERENCE VENDOR/PAYER DEBIT CREDIT DESCRIPTION 1550 PREPAID EXPENSE
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12979 7161 QUADIENT LEASING USA 490.89 11/01/21-01/31/22 TOTAL PREPAID EXPENSE 490.89 .00
2020 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
7 /22 01/20/22 21 12979 7161 QUADIENT LEASING USA 490.89 11/01/21-01/31/22 TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE .00 490.89
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 490.89 490.89
TOTAL REPORT 490.89 490.89
270
PEI PAGE NUMBER: 1
DATE: 01/20/2022 CITY OF LEMOORE AUDIT31
TIME: 15:20:00 REVENUE TRANSACTION ANALYSIS
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.yr='22' and transact.account between '3000' and '3999' and transact.batch='VM012122' ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/22
FUND - 001 - GENERAL FUND
BUDGET UNIT - 001 - GENERAL FUND

ACCOUNT DATE T/C RECEIVE REFERENCE PAYER/VENDOR BUDGET RECEIPTS RECEIVABLES DESCRIPTION 3681 RECREATION FEES
7 /22 01/20/22 210 12982 T2874 SEAN ARE -60.00 REFUND FOR INDOOR SOC TOTAL RECREATION FEES .00 -60.00 .00
3894 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMEN
7 /22 01/20/22 210 12948 7297 AIMS -445.92 OVERPAID TEMPORARY DI TOTAL WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMEN .00 -445.92 .00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND .00 -505.92 .00
TOTAL GENERAL FUND .00 -505.92 .00
TOTAL REPORT .00 -505.92 .00
RUN DATE 01/20/2022 TIME 15:20:00 PEI - FUND ACCOUNTING 271

Lemoore City CouncilFebruary 1, 2022

Lemoore City Council
February 1, 2022