Minutes — Lincoln City Council, September 27, 2022

• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life Lincoln • ****
AB-America City

MINUTES

CITY OF LINCOLN

CITY COUNCIL, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTORITY
and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Regular Meting
September 27, 2022

OPEN SESSION MEETING
Meeting conducted in-person at City Hall, 600 fth Street, Lincoln, CA and virtually on Zoom with Live Stream on City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18.

1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Andreatta at 6:03PM.

2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Paul Joiner
Dan Karleskint
William Lauritsen
Alyssa Silhi
Mayor Holly Andreatta
Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.

Staff members present: Sean Scully, City Manager
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney
Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief
Travis Williams, Acting City Engineer (Consultant)
Nita Wracker, Finance Director
Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk
Various City employees, consultants and members of the public were also present in person and via teleconference.
.REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION - Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated that staff received direction, but there is no reportable action at this time.

4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - led by Nita Wracker, Finance Director.

5. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS - Sean Scully, City Manager, asked to move item 10.C (Workshop: Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Plant Joint Powers Authority) from General Business to Presentations just item 6.

6. PRESENTATIONS

6.A.) Workshop on Youth Development Plan Partnership with Western Placer Unified School District (W.P.U.S.D)
Kerry Callahan, Superintendent, provided handouts on the 'Blueprint for Student Success' on the Youth Development Plan to City Council and Staff, made a part of these meting minutes by mention thereof, and introduced Adrian Ruiz, from the Youth Development Network. Jason Price, W.P.U.S.D Board Member, spoke in favor of the project.

Mayor Andretta thanked presenters for their presentation.

Councilmember Silhi gave kudos and shared her excitement for the project. Councilmember member discussion ensued, agreeing the project is a benefit for all students and could breathe new life into reenacting the Police Activities League (P.A.L) in Lincoln.

Mayor Andreatta clarified W.P.U.S. D's goals: City support, incorporate project into our programs, and review funds to assist in program growth.
600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln. Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life Lincoln • ****

Page 2 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022

10.C Workshop: Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Plant Joint Powers Authority - receive an update on the ongoing discussions relating to the Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Plant and associated proposals for the formation of a Joint Powers Agreement and facilitation of an expansion at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Sean Scully, City Manager, gave a Power Point presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof, introduced Nita Wracker, Finance Director, who provided additional financial background, rate information and timelines.

Sean Scully, City Manager, introduced Placer County Supervisor, Jim Holmes who attends the 2x2 meetings with the City of Lincoln, Ken Graham, Placer County Public Works Director and Kevin Bell, Placer County Assistant Public Works Director.

Councilmembers agreed to hear public comment prior to City Council discussion.

Mayor Andreatta opened the discussion to the public with the following comments:

1. Lena Lebowski, a Lincoln resident, concerned with giving away City asset. Gave kudos to Sean Scully, City Manager, and City Council. Asked City Council to consider all options regarding the agreement.

2. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, commented on the bird migration at the Wastewater Treatment plant. Encouraged residents to visit the Wastewater Plant.

3. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, asked if any development would be impacted by this agreement.

Sean Scully, City Manager, responded to Mrs. Borchardt, stating that the project does affect all projects in the City of Lincoln, as without the capacity to serve our current and future residents, the City and County will run into major infrastructure issues. There may be a perception that the expansion is only required as a result of growth; however, that is a misnomer.

The City and County are highly invested in ensuring the joint powers authority (JPA) manages the infrastructure, as it is a major investment for all municipalities involved.

4. Byron Chapman, a Lincoln resident, spoke in favor of the joint power authority formation and expansion.

5. Anne Constantin Birge, a Lincoln resident, gave kudos for collaboration efforts.

Mayor Andreatta asked Ken Graham, Placer County Public Works Director to come to the podium.

Mr. Graham thanked the City Council and Staff for their leadership. The JPA has helped us envision wastewater in our region and the importance is mutually beneficial and a win-win relationship.

Mayor Andretta thanked Placer County Public Works staff and Placer County Supervisors for their assistance. Councilmember discussion ensued.

7. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS

1. Kevin Siddle, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff regarding speed mitigation on First Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street, and distributed a petition made a part of these of these minutes by mention thereof.
600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln- Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • ***

Page 3 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022

2. Jose Fuentes, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff regarding speed mitigation on First Street especially between "O" Street and "R" Street. Mr. Fuentes suggested the City of Lincoln put in speed bumps to slow traffic down, as First Street has become increasingly unsafe.

3. Alex Franklin, a Lincoln resident, addressed the City Council and City Staff on speed control on First Street. Mr. Franklin cited a recent vehicle accident, near misses with pedestrians and concern with students walking to local elementary schools.

Mayor Andreatta, asked Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, to respond to residents on speed mitigation.

Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, thanked speakers for their civil and conversational tone. Chief Alves discussed the challenges with the wide roadway, implementing speed bumps and enforcement. Chief Alves and Lincoln Police Department are aware of the increase in speeding on First Street.

Travis Williams, City Engineer, added that he would connect with the Public Safety Chief to discuss the possibilities of the narrowing the path of travel, as people naturally will mitigate their own speed when you have less room for error.

Councilmember Lauritsen, suggested adding additional stop signs.

Matt Alves, Public Safety Chief, appreciated the suggestion, however, a stop sign mid-street would not work, as the nearest stop sign is fifty to seventy-five yards from the intersection.

Mayor Andreatta thanked City Staff and residents for their collaboration and continued public comments.

4. Anne Constantin Birge, a Lincoln resident, provided historical timelines and information on the Titan Ballistic Missile Site that has been proposed within the Village 1 as the Missile Silo Park. Mrs. Birge expressed concern with ground water contamination left over from the former United States Air Force Missile Site. Supporting documentation was provided outlining potential park location and chemicals of potential concern, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof.

5. Ray Birge, a Lincoln Resident, introduced himself as a retired professional as a water and housing developer. Mr. Birge lives in Sun City Lincoln Hills and voiced concern with water shortages due to climate change, drought and on-going development. Mr. Birge stated he is not requesting a moratorium, but asks that the City Council reconsider rapid development.

Mayor Andreatta thanked both speakers for providing comment on the proposed Missile Silo Park in Village One and continued public comment.

6. Jay Gruenwald, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposal presented at the Parks and Recreation Committee September 7, 2022 meeting and gave a Power Point Presentation made a part of these minutes by mention thereof.

7. Gene Morgan, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposal presented at the Parks and Recreation Committee September 7, 2022 meeting and distributed a letter made a part of these minutes by mention thereof.

Mayor Andreatta thanked both speakers for providing comment. Additionally, City Council and Staff will take their comments into consideration. Mayor Andreatta stated that that the City Council nor City Staff is responsible for articles in the local newspaper. The proposed Disc Golf Park at Auburn Ravine is just one idea that has not been through the entire vetting process. Mayor Andreatta asked Sean Scully, the City 600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • ****

Page 4 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022
Manager, if he would like to make a comment.

Sean Scully, City Manager, Stated the City of Lincoln can dictate how the process goes, but the City can not control the information printed in newspapers. One of the objectives of the Parks and Recreation Committee is to identify and propose recreation amenities for the community. Some proposals will work, some will not work. Part of the process is going through and figuring out A.) Is the project feasible B) Is it something that the community is supportive of? C.) Is it something that we can afford to do? We can't jump all the way to decision D without doing A, B and C first. Currently, the City Council and Staff are at points A and B.

Mayor Andreatta responded to Mr. Morgan, stating that the City Council and Staff will review all comments and will take everything into consideration and continued public comment.

8. Jennifer Tandy, is the Lincoln Christian Academy Administrator at the Lincoln Christian Life Center.

Ms. Tandy spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development.

9. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development.

10. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development.

11. Steve Ernst, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development. Mr.

Ernst sent a letter to the Council addressing his concerns.

12. Bill Rath, Pastor of Lincoln Christian Life Center, spoke in opposition of the Deer Crossing Center Development.

13. Kim McEwen, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of the Disc Golf Park proposed at the Auburn Ravine Park.

14. CA, Carly, (did not provide her last name) attended the September 21: 2022 Planning Commission meeting. Carly addressed the City Council with her concerns related to two members of the Planning Commission.

Mayor Andreatta asked if there were any more public comments, hearing none, Mayor Andretta closed public comment.

8. CONSENT
Mayor Andreatta asked if any members of the City Council or public would like to pull any items from the Consent Agenda. Councilmembers did not pull any items from the Consent Agenda.

Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, asked to pull item 8.M from the Consent Agenda.

Mayor Andreatta called for a motion of the remainder of the consent agenda items. Councilmember Karleskint motioned approval of the items and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Lauritsen, By the following Vote (Approved): Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye, and Mayor Andreatta - Aye. The items approved were:

8.A. Approval of Minutes of September 13, 2022 Regular City Council meeting. 600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 •Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life: Lincoln • *****
-America Cit

Page 5 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022

8.B. Receive and File Treasurer's Report for the period ending August 31, 2022

8.C. Receive and File Budget to Actual Report for the period ending August 31, 2022.

8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-218 amending the City's Conflict of Interest Policy.

8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-219 amending both the Fiscal year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program budget and the Fiscal year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program.

8.F. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-220 allowing the submittal of the application for the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (Cal Recycle) Rubberized Pavement Grant Program for which the City of Lincoln is eligible.

8.G. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-221 authorizing the City Manager to execute a purchase order for $384,001 to procure a BME Model 34 Type 3 fire engine and a purchase order for $93,512 to procure ten Scott X3 self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA's) for the Fire Department.

8.H. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-222 authorizing the City Manager to execute a Contract for Services with Mesa Energy Systems Inc, dba: EMCOR Services Mesa Energy for Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning( HVAC) Services for a total amount not to exceed of $425,348 (Supplemental included) for a three-year period (ending June 30, 2025), with the option to extend the contract for one additional three- year term and authorizing the Public Works Director or his/her designee, to execute any necessary change orders that are within the approved supplemental budget.

8.I. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-223 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with West Coast Arborists, Inc. (WCA), to provide On-Call Tree Care and Maintenance Services, for a total amount not to exceed $180,000 ($60,000 each year) from the Streets Fund 223 for a three-year term, expiring June 30, 2025.

8.J. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-224 accepting CIP 492: Fire Station 33 Exterior Waterproofing and CIP 494: Fire Station 34 Exterior Repairs as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

8.K. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-225 accepting CIP 229: Airport Underground Fuel Tanks Removal Project as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

8.L. Adopt RESOLUTION 2022-226 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract amendment with Websoft Developers, Inc. that would allow for a one-year extension of their existing contract (for a new term that would end on September 27, 2023) to provide technical support and maintenance of the City's Work Order System for a total amount not to exceed $40,000.Websoft Developers Contract Amendment.

Waive full reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE 1055B amending Lincoln Municipal Code section 17.16.190 regarding discretionary extensions for tentative subdivision maps to be consistent with State law, and finding the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").

ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA

8.M. Waive full reading and adopt by title only ORDINANCE 1054B, establishing a Development Agreement between the City of Lincoln, on the one hand, and Pappas Arizona, LP and Pappas Gateway 600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • ****

Page 6 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022
LP (collectively "Pappas") on the other hand for the development of approximately 44. 13 acres of General Commercial and Employment Center zoned ("commercially zoned") property within the Twelve Bridges Plan Area; and finding the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). (Kristine Mollenkopf)

1. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, spoke in opposition of ORDINANCE 1054B.

2. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, spoke against additional gas stations.

Mayor Andreatta called for a motion. Councilmember Joiner motioned approval of 8.M and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Silhi. By the following Vote (Approved): Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, and Mayor Andreatta - Aye: ORDINANCE 1054B

9. PUBLIC HEARINGS- None

10. GENERAL BUSINESS

10.A. City Council discussion, provide edits and consider approval of RESOLUTION 2022-227 approving the draft response to the Placer Grand Jury "Homelessness in Placer County" Recommendation 5.

Homelessness Grand Jury Response.

Sean Scully, City Manager, provided an update on the Placer Grand Jury report and draft response made to the Grand Jury. The City Manager and City Council agree on the draft as it relates to practical approach for the City of Lincoln the goals it has to be well thought out, planned with wraparound services that elevate people out of homelessness permanently.

Sean Scully, City Manager requested feedback and edits as he needs to submit by September 28, 2022 to meet deadlines.

Councilmember conversation ensued.

Mayor Andreatta opened and closed the Public discussion at 8:22pm.

1. Mona Bass, leads the Adopt-A-Creek organization in Lincoln. The Adopt-A-Creek has been working with the homeless in the Auburn Creek Ravine area for the last three years. Mrs. Bass implores the City Council to keep moving forward, and asks that the City Council and Staff not wait on Placer County direction. The Adopt-A-Creek volunteers ask that the City Council and City staff start really looking at what we can do in Lincoln.

Mayor Andreatta thanked Mona Bass for her comments.

Mayor Andreatta called for a motion.

Councilmember Joiner motioned approval of the resolution and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Silhi. By the following Vote (Approved) Joiner - Aye, Silhi - Aye, Karleskint - Aye, Lauritsen - Aye, and Mayor Andreatta - Aye: RESOLUTION 2022-227 approving the draft response to the Placer Grand Jury "Homelessness in Placer County" Recommendation 5. Homelessness Grand Jury Response.

10.B. Workshop: Parklet - City Council give feedback on the concept of whether to invest resources and time in exploring the establishment of a process to allow permanent or semi-permanent parklets or other use of public space by downtown businesses within the downtown area. 600 Sixth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 •Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln• Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • Live • Life • Lincoln • ****

Page 7 of 7 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
September 27 2022
Sean Scully, City Manager, gave a Power Point presentation, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof. The City Council advised that the project is not a high priority; however, they agreed the project is worth exploring. Councilmember conversation ensued.

11. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS
Mayor Andreatta wanted to understand the methodology on how to address the recent Planning Commission meeting that was held on September 21, 2022.

Councilmember discussion ensued.

12. INFORMATION ITEMS
Library Open House is October 1, 2022, from 5-7pm. The Twelve Bridges Library will be celebrating their 15' year.

Mayor Andreatta reminded the City Council of the upcoming Kiwanis Children's Health Fair on October 9th.

The Health Fair will be held at Glen Edwards Middle School.

Richard Pearl reminded City Council and Staff of the Airport Open House day on October 8, 2022.

ADJOURNMENT - Mayor Andreatta adjourned the meeting at approximately 9:03pm.

Submitted by:
ewen santon
Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk
600 Sinth Street • Lincoln, CA 95648 • www.ci.lincoln.ca.us • 916-434-2400 WPUSD
Blueprint for Student Success
Goals

1. All students will graduate from high school college and career ready.

2. All students and families will be actively engaged in learning and in their school communities.

Development Framework
"Youth who develop healthy relationships, participate in meaningful learning opportunities, and are held to high expectations become successful adults who maintain economic self-sufficiency, have healthy relationships, and contribute to their community."

SKILL BUILDING
Opportunities to builo
applicable skills in engaging
and challenging ways.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Opportunities to contribute to and gain
knowledge of the community.

ENGAGEMENT
Opportunities for meaningful participation, also
known as voice and choice.

RELATIONSHIP BUILDING
Individuals can develop positive, caring, and consistent relationships with others, including peers, supervisors, and mentors.

SAFETY
People feel physically, culturally, and emotionally safe. They are free from harm or judgment, and they feel confident that they will be accepted for who they are.

Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
What do we want students to learn or be able to do?
How will we guide/support their learning/doing?
How will we measure their success?
How will we support them if they struggle?
How will we push them further if they excel?
Phases 1 & 2
Bulkiing
Community
Youth
Participation
Relationship
Bullding
Safety
Learn Common Survey the young people of
Dive deep with listening
Language of Youth the community to get their circles including young Development with voice and opinions
people and their parents
community and guardians
stakeholders
Phase 3
REPORT
3D Dialogue strategic Establishing
Full Community of
sessions that focus on Developmental
Woodland Youth Action
designing the key Areas indicators through
Plan Draft document for
elements of a YDN Facilitation
Executive and leadership
Youth Master Plan
committee final review
-
Arenas
Youth at the Center
Public Systems &
Child Services Juvenile Philanthropy
Policy
Welfare Justice
Child Care/ Settings
Parks &
Youth Serving Recreation
Organizations Youth Curriculum
Families
0-20+
Health Faith Based
Public Care Communities
Communities Practice
Opinion Youth
Education Employment
Libraries & & Training
Museums
Research Advocacy
Lincoln/North Auburn
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Discussion
The History & The Issues
March 2012 - Board of Supervisors accepted the City's offer to construct, own, and operate a regional pump station and pipeline from North Auburn to the Lincoln WWTRF, increase the capacity of the WWTRF to accommodate sewer flows from Sewer Maintenance District 1 (SMD 1), and decommission the wastewater treatment plant that served SMD 1.
• October 2013 - City of Lincoln and Placer County executed the Construction, Operations, and Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (COJA) under which the City constructs and then provides wastewater treatment for SMD 1 as well as operation and maintenance (O&M) of the SMD 1 pump station and regional pipeline for a fixed charge per EDU.

May 2016 - the improvements were completed and the City began treating wastewater from SMD 1.

Auburn WiTH
The History & The Issues Continued
Wastewater Treatment is currently combined with collections for Lincoln residents The City bills the County for treatment, operations and maintenance of their Sewer Maintenance District 1 (SMD-1) facility
Fixed O&M charges to the County did not cover City costs which is unsustainable long term
Repair and Rehabilitation costs were additive above the O&M charges, making budgeting difficult
A structural deficit exists within the Lincoln wastewater enterprise fund Lincoln sewer /wastewater rates have not increased in a decade The Wastewater Treatment Plant (Plant) is reaching capacity limits and expansion is needed
Additional funds are needed to pay for the expansion
JPA
As part of the ongoing effort to resolve core COJA issues, a new model (driven by the need to expand the plant) is discussed.

An independent agency with the sole purpose of operating & managing the wastewater treatment plant.

The Board of the JPA is proposed to be comprised of 2 members from governing bodies of the City and County.

The anticipated growth in the service area of the Plant is an important reason to form a JPA.

The JPA would be responsible for future rate increases.

The JPA would be responsible for any future or potential liabilities and regulatory compliance.

Core Values of Potential JPA
All for One, One for All
No City EDUs vs County EDUs; all EDUs are
same regardless of jurisdictional boundaries
Align Interests
Good for one is good for the other/bad for one is
bad for the other
Shared Obligations and Responsibilities
In the existing and future system for all ratepayers
Process of formation
Develop business points
Engage 2x2 and TAG
Engage outside counsel that specializes in JPA formation Consideration of approval by Council and Board of Sups
Select interim General Manager and Finance Director
Establish JPA and transfer assets to the JPA
Establish charges and construct expansion
Draft Business Points
Own and operate the regional wastewater facilities
Employ agents and employees
Establish charges, or other costs in connection with the regional facilities Charge the County and the City on a proportionate basis based on the number of respective equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) within each jurisdiction
Develop and adopt policies and procedures
Be governed by the JPA Board comprised of two County Board of Supervisors and two City Council members
Have the authority to change the Agreement upon a unanimous vote from the JPA Board
The Expansion
Estimated cost $58M
To be completed in 2 phases
Bond debt of between $34-42M to be used for phase 1 (depending on project details, more next slide)
Additional capacity from both phases will serve approximately 10,000 EDU's
Construction of phase 1 to begin as soon as possible
Construction of phase 2 should begin by year 2027
Lincoln WWTRF Expansion Increments and Capacity 1 Septemember 2022 Current Phase 2 Phase 2
conditions Phase 1 wl FIRST wi Phase 182 FIRST w/ Phase 1w/ Original Current with Peak Peak Flow Peak Flow w/Peak Flow Peak MORE Peak MORE Design Conditions Flow Shaving Shaving Sharing Shaving Flow Shaving Flow Shaving Peak Flow Factor (PDF / ADWF) 4.5 3.9 3.9
Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF), mgd 5.9 5.0 5.3 6.4 5.7 6.8 5.9 6.6 Peak Day Flow, mgd 20.7 227 20.7 24.7 221 26.4 21.1 23.6 Annual Average BOD Load (AAL), Ib/d 14,040 15,090 15,960 19,040 17,030 20,280 17,540 19,620 EDUs (0.5 BOD/EDU/day) 28,080 30,180 31,920 38,080 34,060 40,560 35,080 39,240 2021
Capacity
Memo
Incremental EDUs Added 6,160 2,140 8,640 3,160 7,320
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs (1) $42,660,000 $34,450.000 $58,600.000 $34.450,000 $42,660.000 SEDU $6,925 $16,098 $10,902 $5,828
Ranked by SEDU 3 5 4
Peak Flow Shaving Events per Year at Peak Day at Design Conditions (2) Peak Flow Shaving Events per Year at Peak Hour at Design Conditions (2) (1) Phase 1 alone includes the DAFT and filter from Phase 2; Phase 2 alone includes TSB3 from Phase 1. (1) Peak day fow event number based on historic flow data; peak hour events based on 4 times peak day.

JPA Financial Proforma
Budget Projected Rate Adoption Period Projected

RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029

REVENUES (TREATMENT ONLY)
FEE REVENUES $ 12,175,566 $12,666,242 $ 13,176,691 $ 13,707,712 $ 14,260,132 $ 14,834,816 $ 15,432,659 Recycled (reclamied) water 57,400 57,400 57,400 57,400 57,400 57,400 57,400 Bond Proceeds 42,660,000
Other Revenue
Interest Income 121,756 126,662 131,767 137,077 142,601 148,348 154,327 TOTAL REVENUES $55,014,722 $12,850,304 $13,365,858 $13,902,189 $14,460,134 $15,040,564 $15,644,385

EXPENDITURES (TREATMENT ONLY)
Salaries & Benefits $ 261,616| $ 268,888 $ 276,379 $ 284,095 $ 292,041 $ 300,227 $ 308,657 Other Operating Costs 7,540,044 7,710,194 7,934,047 8,164,617 8,404,103 8,648,715 8,900,664 TOTAL 08M $7,801,660 $7,979,082 $8,210,427 $8,448,711 $8,696,145 $8,948,941 $9,209,321 Capital expenditures $43,320,000 $ 532,000 532,000 $ 532,000 $ 532,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Debt Service for current expansion 3,191,906 3,191,450 3,191,250 3,194,125 3,189,800 3,193,550 3,189,825 TOTAL CAPITAL/DEBT $46,511,906 $3,723,450 $3,723,250 $3,726,125 $3,721,800 $3,693,550 $3,689,825 Transfer to Debt Reserve $ 125,027 $ - - $ - $ $
58,330 81,348 83,111 85,604
Transfer to General Reserve $ $ 76,058 78,340| $ $ $
NET OPERATIONS/CAPITAL REVENUES (LOSS)| $701,156 $964,415 $1,356,123 $1,649,012 $1,960,841 $2,314,962 $2,659,635 Financial Stats
OPERATING EXPENSES $7.8M CAPITAL EXPENSES $43.3M
Operations contract & related $42. 6M for phase 1 expansion costs: 68% of operating expenses
$245K for IT equipment
Utilities: 21% of operating expenses
$235K for SCADA control upgrades
Admin, prof services & overhead:
$180K for fleet equipment
9% of operating expenses
Debt and Rates
years 30 yr @ 3.75% 30 yr @ 4% 30 yr @ 4.5% 30 уг ( 15.5% 40 yr @5.5% 40 yr @6% FYE 2023 2,566,758 2,651,380 2,825,065 3,191,906 2,871,160 3,075,093 Rate $ 32.78$ 33.51 $ 33.51 $ 34.56 $ 33.65 $ 34.22
The JPA will need to issue bond and acquire debt to fund phase 1 This demonstrates the payment for the first year of the new debt based on different terms and interest rates
The rate could be reflected of the debt payment
Anticipated TREATEMENT charge breakdown per EDU @ 5.5% , ^ COLLECTION charge breakdown per EDU O&M Expenses -$20.73 > O&M Expenses ~$16.79
R&R -$ 1.42 > R&R/Capital - $13.117
Debt Related Expenses =$12.41 > Debt -$ 0.73
Total Treatment Charge -$34.56 > Total Collection Charge -$30.63 Combined Treatment and Collection Charge per EDU $65.19 This is the estimated charge per EDU regardless of whether the JPA is formed or not Connection fees and Expansion - Phase 2
FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025 FYE 2026 FYE 2027 FYE 2028 FYE 2029

EXPANSION FUND
$O $1,500,000 $5,500,000 $9,406,700 $13,592,450 $1,668,675 $5,296,325

BEGINNING BALANCE
Connection revenues by
year $1,500,000$4,000,000$3,906,700$4,185,750$4,046,225$3,627,650$3,627,650 Cost of Expansion - Phase
0($15,970,000)
2 EXPANSION FUND
ENDING BALANCE $1,500,000 $5,500,000 $9,406,700 $13,592,450 $1,668,675 $5,296,325 $8,923,975 Phase 2 would be paid for by fees collected from new connections Potential Advantages
Charges are set adequately to be sustainable into the future Charges incorporate Rehabilitation and Repair projects
Charges are set to fund first expansion project and future expansion projects will be funded through connection fees After expansion project is paid for, charges will be
stabilized
Align the County and City to establish a sustainable authority and stabilize rates into the future
Create specialized JPA that's sole focus is efficient service delivery of treatment.

Potential for more transparency.

Create a mechanism to (theoretically) resolve conflicts with the County as partners versus customer/vendor.

Liability and transfer of risk to third party.

Potential Drawbacks
Concerns about potential disparate goals within the JPA format depending on jurisdiction.

Perception that Lincoln is "giving away" an asset.

Placer County will have less and less of a percentage share of the plant as Lincoln grows over time, concerns may be raised over equal voting power by County.

Navigation of complexity in establishing true equity given a vast difference in land use and billing structure.

Some overhead costs will now need to be absorbed directly by the collections system that are current being covered under treatment. • Perception that additional "government" is being created that may cost slightly more than current operational expenditures.

Questions???

PETITION
To the council of the City of Lincoln, California
We the undersigned residents of First Street petition the Counsel and ask that the City of Lincoln California authorize the Department of Public Works to install and, or implement speed limiting devices on First Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street.

First Street has been, and continues to be plagued with speeders.

Following the removal of the "inverted" speed bumps at O Street, many drivers do not stop at the stop sign. Many drivers do not stop at the stop sign at L Street also. Speeds in excess of 45 miles per hour on First Street are routine.

Given that there is not only a church on the street, but also an elementary school, reduction of speed on First Street should be a priority for the City of Lincoln, as hereby attested to by the undersigned residents of First Street.

The contact person for this petition is:

Kevin Siddle 1544 1st Street Lincoln, CA 95648 916-213-9479 PETITION: City of Lincoln: speed limiting devices-1st Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street_2022 Name Address Phone Signature
DENNiS KELlERMAN IST ST
Jaime Kellerman. f* st metalll
Nade siddle Ist str 500/l
Jessicutuentes =1s s
Jose Fuenty 1st st
Bill i Linda Doble. bot Strect
Socorra Montano first st
FiRsT S3

MICHAEL DAVID FIRST PT
Mikaela Ramirez First st Murala Ramive
'HOWARMANDERSON SIST
Ann restore. Ist
BIPRESTON + 15
WAYHE PAUl IST
SheeR, Paus 1St
PETITION: City of Lincoln: speed limiting devices-1st Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street_2022 Name Address Phone Signature
IST
Sandra Zavala I ST
sama Savala
GERARDO GonzAlEZ first st
V _ NICK THOMAS 14T
Joseph Hobbs (st
* Dimitri ll. Tegal. 15t

AEXANDER FRANKLI
V denm Frawklin St quin Enak
(scal Diaz 1st
•obert Ross L ST
Rosio Navarro ISt
Danal Albert • Ist
1ST SL
Dennis turio - 155T
Pete fis.. 1ST 7
PETITION: City of Lincoln: speed limiting devices-1st Street between Lincoln Boulevard and R Street_2022 Name Address Phone
•HSt
Reyla Sharp
Jessica boya # Street

MIKE KIMBROUGH IST STREET
Clemens
JosE Ovinors It ste
Maria Guinon Ist. St.
sennabader Hollingsworth. bulletes
Rest tall First st. stolen
Is Outmak It thatt
Andrea Allen _. First St And all
Cinda Correa First it, Linen. Cita Conten
Jose López. FirsT sT lincoln CA
Teresa Ochoa. _First st Lincolnca Teresa Ochoa
MANUEC MORALS HOLLINES WORTH DR MAmaN E Moral
Silo Silo
silo
Tras
Camera: 377 m 38*5246°N 121:1544 W
ogie © 100% Imagery date: 5/23/14
Documents made available to
Lincoln City Council members on
27 S8p 2022 by:

Anne Constantin Birge Plume Dir 3 gun ran Silo doors Non-silo c

PROPOSED
PARK
SV-1
TCE 5800
Benzene 12 U
SV-20
TCE 7.8 SV-2
Benzene 1.3 TCE 1,3
Benzene 2.5
SV-17B
TCE 8.2
Benzene 0.45 J
SV-19 SV-18
TCE 30 TCE 3.6
Benzene
Benzene 0.77
SV-3 tion
TCE 1 U (0.99 U)
Benzene 0.84 (0.77) Lume
SV-4
TCE 0.20 J (0.92 U) Dire
Benzene 0.65 J (.26 J)
SV-6
TCE 30
SV-10 Benzene 1.7
TCE 1.6
Benzene 0.8 SV-7
SV-9B TCE 0.86 U
TCE, 2.8 Benzene 0.87
Benzene 0.41 J SV-5B
TCE 130
SV-11 Benzene 0.43 J
TCE 2.1
Benzene 1.8 SV-16
TCE 100
SV-15B Benzene 0.52 J
TCE 1U
Benzene 1.3 SV-8
TCE 1.5
Benzene 4.7
• The chemical Delow unk
cOPes Former Titan 1-A Missile Facility
3Q21 Groundwater and Soil Vapor Monitoring
Report Placer County, Lincoln, California Formerly Used Defense Site Chemicals Potential Concern
Table 2. Groundwater and Soil Vapor Project Reference Levels Project
Groundwater
PRL (pg/L) 1 Referana
Analysis Method Analyte Basis
MCL(a) 6 Level
SW8260C LL 1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene, cis- MCL (a) 6
1,2-Dichloroethene, trans- 10
1,4-Dichlorobenzene USEPA(b) 0.48
Benzene MCL (a) 1
Ethylbenzene USEPA) 1.5
Groundwate MCL(a) 150
Toluene
Trichloroethene MCLa) 5
Vinyl chloride MCL (a) 0.5
Xylene, o- MCL (a) 1.75
Xylenes, m-/p- MCLa) 1.75
Soil Vapor
Analysis Method Analyte Basis PRL (ug/m)
TO-15 1,1-Dichloroethene ESL (c) 2,400
1,2-Dichloroethene, cis- 280
1,2-Dichloroethene, trans- ESL®) 2,800
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ESLe 8.5
Benzene EST (C) 3.2
Ethylbenzene 37
Toluene ESL(s) 10,000
Trichloroethene 16
Vinyl chloride 0.32
Xylene, o- ESL (c) 3,500
Xylenes, m-, p- ES_ (c) 3,500
Notes:

PRL - Project Reference Level
ppbv - parts per billion by volume
ug/L- micrograms per liter
Hg/m - micrograms per cubic meter
Reference source for Project Refence Levels
(a)MCL - California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Maximum Contaminant Levels (July, 2021)
(b)USEPA — USEPA Tap Water Regional Screening Level - May 2021. (e)ESL — San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board; Table SG-1: Sub-slab Soil Gas and Exterior Soil Gas Vapor Intrusion; Residential Vapor Intrusion (VI) Human Health Risk Screening Levels 2019)
This is just the Powerhouse
at another Titan1 site
The diesel generators were removed by the Air Force before taking bids on salvage contracts. I have heard they were all sent to Vandenberg AFB but cannot verify this.

The above photo shows an operational view of the Power House taken from the mezzanine level looking in the general direction of the fresh air intake which was located behind the large tanks at the upper left of the picture. You can see how the Airman is dwarfed by the equipment around him.

The arm of central pivot crane can be seen at top and of course the diesel generators dominate this photo as they do the entire room. The generators-were manufactured by Worthington and each could produce 1000 kw of 2400v 3-phase power at 60hz. This capacity was capable in 1960 of providing electrical requirements to a community of 5000 people. Of course that was before the whole house became wired and crammed with electrical appliances like big screen TVs and microwaves. Today's households would of course suck up far more power than the average 60's household.

Descending to level 2 you can see the extent to which this particular site was flooded. Some fun facts to bring a bit of perspective here:

Depth of the titan silos: 150 feet
Diameter of silos: 40 feet
Volume of empty silo: 188,496 cubic feet (rounded to nearest unit) Estimated depth of water in photo below: Approx. 80 feet Volume of flood water in silo at 80 feet deep: 752,024 gallons (rounded to nearest unit) Weight of 1 gallon of fresh water: 8.345 pounds
Approx. weight of 80 feet of water in the silo: 6,275,639 pounds or 3,137.82 tons Time to sump silo using 116 gal/minute pump:* Approx. 108 hours or 4.5 days *Assuming a flood depth of 80 feet.

For those out there who may already own a silo or those who would love nothing more than to bu an old missile complex and clean it up and restore or renovate it, this is a taste of what you might encounter while working on a Cold War "fixer upper".

Dewatering a silo would also require the use of an expensive commercial sump system capable o lifting water from 150 feet down-far more than most pumps can handle. The breed of pump that can handle this job is generally used for sumping out mines and construction sites. While such a pump can certainly be sourced and purchased, it would likely be best (and cheaper) to hire someone experienced to handle the job.

I don't want to sound like I'm trying to discourage anyone from trying to fix up a site, far from it, jus be prepared to run up against some solid challenges when it comes to reclaiming some areas. jrom another Titan I site
- this doasn't inciude all
the TCE I asbestos- cent-
aminated water in ail
The other parts is
each Titan jacility.
• Photo of Titan-1 851-A Ballistic Silo doors and lead shot Taken by Anne Constantin Birge
August 2022
Auburn Ravine Park
Proposed Disc Golf Project

Ореп брасе
Wetland Preserve
No dogs, motorized
vehicles, bicycles,
dumping or other
disturbance of
protected wetland
habitats.

Please respect and
help preserve our
open spaces!

TRESPASSERS WILL BE

PROSECUTED AND HELD

LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES

CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE
SECTION 602.6

PRESERVINGOUR NATURAL HE RIAGE CREEKS CONNECTING COMMUNITIES Life Cycle of Chinook Salmon
altorni woodland nemedibly rich with plaste and wildlite cool witer for saloon and
watershed
organizabons ai volunteers are working to make Auburn Kavne codland and aparan (overway) communitie a plae where plants and one al the orgonizat one Below if gow would like to help with restoratiors 4*19 Constellation
Energy

City Council Disc Golf
September 27, 2022
I am here to express my opposition to locating a Disc Golf Course in the Auburn Ravine Nature Preserve (Open Space)
I believe there are two reasons not directly related to the obvious that the area is designated as a preserve/open space. One would be the parking/traffic issue.

The .35 mile of Moore Road leading to the inadequate 15 parking spots is not developed. There are no sidewalks and bike lanes. Proponents of this location advocate for parking along this road. Many spots on this road are not wide enough for cars to get clearly out of the roadway. This creates a safety issue. In the areas where it is wide enough, cars would be parking on or near dry grass which is another safety issue. They also state that participants will not park in the residential areas - this is wishful thinking as demonstrated from the Dog Park.

At the September Parks & Rec committee meeting, Mr. Boyton stated that he had been misquoted and the article in the Lincoln News Messenger was not accurate.

Three weeks have passed and I have yet to read a correction to this information in the paper. Much of the information I now have is from that article and flyers from the proponents. It is stated that the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers did an environmental evaluation and Mr. Boyton has received approval to develop the course at the site. This is blatantly false. To my knowledge there has been no environmental evaluation by the USACOE
On May 11 Mr. Boyton contacted the USACOE seeking permission for the course.

In that email he states that the pathways from hole to hole would remain dirt. The pathways are not necessarily dirt now but they will be dirt because no ground vegetation will remain. He also states that the only structures will be concrete pad at the start of each hole, the cage for the disc and a few trash cans. He also states that his interpretation of the plan is that it is an allowable use of the area.

Throughout the rest of May and early June emails are going back and forth about finding copies of varies documents/plans covering the area. On June 8th Ms.

Pascus from the USACOE notified Mr. Boyton that she had foud some documents and needed to look thru them to see if she could find the long term management plan. She inquires about the issue of wetlands and Mr. Boyton responds that they don't have a plan yet waiting for approval before investing resources. June 10 Ms. Pascus notifies Mr. Boyton the plan she is looking for is the Long-Term Operations and Management Plan or the Lincoln Grossing Nature Preserve Area Operations and Management Plan, On June 13 Mr. Boynton states that he can't find the long term plan but he has this one. June 17th he ask if she has reviewed document.

On June 22nd Ms. Pascus notes that since Disc Golf is not specifically restricted in the document and that bicycling/walking are the closest activities the Disc Golf Park should follow the 50" restriction from any protected wetland. This is flawed reasoning for two reasons. You can not possibly list all the things that are not allowed - you ask permission for what you want. Comparing this to bicycling and walking is also flawed. These activities are passive while Disc Golf is an active activity which are usually not allowed in protected areas. I do not get the impression that Ms. Pascus is familiar with Disc Golf. Mr. Boyton does not supply her with what I believe is critical information. There are multiple baskets on most holes. He did not supply her with the projected number of golfers that will tram down the vegetation - low estimate 5000 rounds of golf with a minimum of 2 players - 10,000 golfers time an average of 6,500 steps per golfer for a total of 65 million steps. If we reach the numbers of Johnson-Springview park in Rocklion - 19,000 rounds fo Disc Golf X minimum of 2 golfers 38,000 × 6,500 = 247 million steps. I believe anyone involved in this decision should have this information.

People have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their backyards. Public Facilities Development 101 is that you don't violate that privacy. Based on city and county documents, communication from the city, and 20 years of past practice we have a higher expectation than normal that our privacy and tranquility will not be violated.

The new facility being developed in Roseville, the Rocklin, Auburn, and Orangevale courses all have parking, restrooms, and at least two entry and exit points. Orangevale is located on Sierra College Bivd and entry and exit are directly off that road.

I am asking you to direct the Parks and Recreation Committee and the Lincoln staff to remove the Aubur Ravine from consideration for a Disc Golf Park and direct them to find another location.

If not you need to follow a process where you start with hearings regarding a change in the way you manage the Preserve and open spaces. If you make the decision to change your policy and practices, you then need to hold hearings to decide how you want to develop those areas.

Another thing promoted by the proponents of this location is that they will drive out the homeless who desecrate the area. Until the last proponent spoke at the last parks and recreation meeting, we were basically told that all Disc Golfers are Cherubs. They never litter, they never park where they are not wanted, etc.

Homelessness is a systemic problem in our society that we do not have an answer for. If you move them, where do they go? If they are violating the riparian guidelines for this area than the city has the obligation to deal with this.