MINUTES
CITY OF LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL,
PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Regular Meeting
March 14, 2023
O
PEN SESSION MEETING
The meeting was conducted in person at City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA, and virtually on Zoom with a Live Stream on the City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18.
1. C
ALL TO ORDER by Mayor Joiner at 6:01 PM.
2. R
OLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Holly Andreatta
Ben Brown
Dan Karleskint
William Lauritsen
Mayor Paul Joiner
Roll Call: 5 members present, 0 member absent, 0 members excused.
Staff members present: Sean Scully, City Manager
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney
Jennifer Brown, Chief Information Officer
Scott Goin, Police Sergeant
Matt Medill, Public Works Director
Rommel Pabalinas, Planning Manager
Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk
Christian Svensk, Community Development Director
Travis Williams, Acting City Engineer (Consultant)
Nita Wracker, Finance Director
Various City employees, consultants, and members of the public were also present in person and via teleconference.
3. R
EPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION – Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated there w
as no reportable action.
4. PL
EDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Led by Richard Pearl, City Treasurer.
5. A
GENDA MODIFICATIONS – None
6. PR
ESENTATIONS – None
7. P
UBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS
1. G
ary Berns, a Lincoln resident, asked the City Council to consider allowing the Lincoln G
irls Softball Association and Lincoln Little League to lease one of the City owned properties on Flightline Drive.
2. A
lan Brudno, a Lincoln resident, stated the Auburn Ravine Nature Preserve area floods every year and encouraged the Council to not allow a disc golf course in the Preserve area.
3. A
lbert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern that the current Mayor doesn’t respond to issues raised at Council meetings during public comment on non-agenda items and asked for an answer to a question at last meeting regarding the new barriers in the Council Chambers.
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
4. Dawn Veltre, a Lincoln resident and Lincoln Gateway Homeowners Association President, stated her concern with homeless illegal activities (propane tanks and marijuana plants) near her home.
5. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, stated her concerns with using the Auburn Ravine Nature Preserve, homeless encampments, Union Pacific Train crossings in Lincoln, cost of Planning Commission Appeal, former Titan Missile site and signal light at Highway 193 and Oak Tree Lane.
6. Richard Pearl, a Lincoln resident and City Treasurer, stated the recent Silicon Bank Failure will not impact Lincoln as the City has a very conservative investment policy and no City funds were invested in this bank.
7. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, expressed her concern with the recent barriers added to City Council Chambers.
Staff briefly responded to the above issues raised during public comment.
Councilmember Andreatta thanked Lincoln Police Department staff for their actions during an incident on March 9, 2023 at 12:56pm at McBean Park Drive and D Street.
Public comment ended at 7:31pm.
8. CONSENT
Mayor Joiner asked if any members of the City Council or public would like to pull any items from the Consent agenda, hearing none, he called for a motion for the Consent agenda items.
Councilmember Andreatta motioned approval of the items and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Karleskint. By the following Vote (Approved): Andretta-Aye, Karleskint – Aye, Brown – Aye, Lauritsen – Aye and Mayor Joiner – Aye. The items approved were:
8.A. Approval of Minutes of February 28, 2023, Regular City Council meeting.
8.B. Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-040 authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to the January 25, 2022 professional services contract with Callander Associates Landscape Architecture (CALA) in the amount of $121,026 for the Henry Rood (Brentford Circle) Park CIP 464.
Sufficient project budget is available in CIP 464 from fund 562 to cover this contract amendment.
8.C.
Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-041 accepting the Turkey Creek Estates Unit 1B Subdivision Improvements as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.
The streets within this subdivision are private streets to be maintained by the Homeowners Association. Within the private streets, the sewer and water infrastructure will be owned and maintained by the City.
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
8.D. Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-042 accepting the Turkey Creek Estates Unit 1C Subdivision Improvements as complete and authorize the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.
The streets within this subdivision are private streets to be maintained by the Home Owners’ Association. Within the private streets, the sewer and water infrastructure will be owned and maintained by the City.
8.E. Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-043 authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract for construction with Pavement Coatings, Co. in the amount of $262,581 and authorize the City Engineer to approve change orders not to exceed $26,300 for the City Parking Lot Resurfacing Project, CIP 608.
The project is funded from Funds 244, 245, and 620 as part of CIP 608 City Parking Lot Resurfacing Project in FY 2022/23 Capital Improvement Budget.
8.F.
Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-044 authorizing the City Manager to:
• take any necessary actions to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) regarding facilities constructed by CIP 307. • to execute grant deeds for the new PCWA Lincoln Metering Station No. 2 and various project related easements to PCWA, and acceptance of an easement from Verdera Community Association.
• to take any necessary actions to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Water Supply Agreement with PCWA that increases unregulated water supplies to the high elevation water zone at Catta Verdera.
8.G. Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-045 terminating the local emergency proclaimed by the City Council on March 17, 2020, and rescind all rules and regulations adopted thereunder.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS
9.A. Conduct a Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission Approval of the Specific Development Plan and Development Permit (Design Review) for Deer Crossing Retail Center and, if so desired, adopt RESOLUTION 2023-046 denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of the Specific Development Plan and Development Permit for the Deer Crossing Retail Center. (Appellants: William Rath of Lincoln Christian Life Center and Jenny Tandy of Lincoln Christian Academy).
CONTINUED DATE CERTAIN FROM 02/28/2023 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated the City Council would be acting in their quasi-judicial capacity, similar to judges, and will evaluate the evidence provided by the appellant, Bill Rath and Jenny Tandy of Lincoln Christian Life Center (LCLC), to determine if the appellant had met their burden of proof. This is different than the Council’s usual legislative role approving resolutions and ordinances. She gave a brief description of the public hearing process, also a bit different than the usual public hearing process. Ms. Mollenkopf stated Staff will begin by giving a presentation which will be followed by an opportunity for the project applicant to give a presentation not-to-exceed 15 minutes; the appellant would then have the opportunity to make a presentation not-to-exceed 15 minutes. She continued the Mayor would then open the public hearing to take public comments and once closed, the applicant would have a 3-minute rebuttal opportunity and the process would conclude with a 3-minute rebuttal period for the appellant.
After these presentations, public comment and rebuttals, the City Council would then begin their deliberations.
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
Councilmember Andreatta stated she was recusing herself for same reasons she stated at the February 28th City Council meeting with one clarification that she was recusing herself not only for the good of LCLC but also for the good of the City of Lincoln and exited the room at 6:35pm.
Rommel Pabalinas, Planning Manager, gave a brief staff report describing the project and Planning Commission actions. A brief discussion on swapping the order of speakers ensued with Council consensus to stay with the order as described by Ms. Mollenkopf.
APPLICANT PRESENTATION (not to exceed 15 minutes)
At 6:45pm, Joseph Alvernaz, Borges Architecture Group and Applicant’s representative, began his presentation by stating the project design is appropriate and complies with City’s zoning code, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA and the Sun City Lincoln Hills development requirements. He concluded at 6:47pm by stating the applicant team worked for several years on the project and the nearby McBean Park Drive/Oak Tree Lane intersection which was designed in good faith and approved by the Planning Commission.
APPELLANT PRESENTATION (not to exceed 15 minutes)
At 6:47pm, Bill Rath, Appellant, stated he was not a lawyer or developer but his understanding is the project doesn’t comply with zoning code because a drive-thru restaurant would need to get a conditional use permit (CUP) approved and therefore isn’t in compliance with current zoning laws. He stated he spoke with Planning Departments from many other cities and asked them their process which was a project is presented and approved but a CUP isn’t required. Mr.
Rath continued his issue is with the Planning Commission not understanding they could not approve the project given current drawings because the drive-thru restaurant doesn’t comply with zoning code because a CUP is needed and in most cities that would mean that the project isn’t in compliance and would get sent back to Planning and Design to have the developer remove the drive-thru restaurant from the design. He stated LCLC isn’t against building on the adjoining property but that this project will disproportionately impact their business and the location of the drive-thru restaurant right next to their playground is not the best location for LCLC because it is a hazard in multiple ways, so they are appealing on status that it doesn’t comply with current zoning laws. Mr. Rath stated he appreciated Planning Commission requesting an 8’ wall between the development and LCLC but he requests the project be sent back so the wall could be incorporated into design. He heard from Planning Staff that they don’t like to build walls, but the Esplanade, East 12th Street, Twelve Bridges residential projects all have walls so a wall would be consistent with other city projects. Mr. Rath stated they were novices when filing the appeal because of the deadline it be filed within 10 days of approval by the Planning Commission, but since then he has spoken to many other planning agencies to research what their requirements would be for a drive-thru restaurant. He continued the other agencies would either request an application to change zoning use or the project to be changed because by including the drive-thru in the plans it is a tacit approval and it would be in the best interest of City of Lincoln to not include in the design. Mr. Rath stated the LCLC Church has been in Lincoln for 80-100 years and at the current location since 1972 and even though LCLC can’t tell applicant what to build on their property there should have been some communication and the pictures of the proposed project don’t include LCLC and its very prevalent sign on Highway 193/McBean Park Drive. He concluded by stating there is enough evidence to send the project back to planning and design to get the 8’ wall on design and ensure drive-thru not approved without proper zoning process. He concluded his comments at 6:53pm.
Mayor Joiner opened the public hearing at 6:53pm with the following comments:
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
1. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, referenced a powerpoint presentation she had forwarded to City Council prior to the meeting, made a part of these minutes by mention thereof.
She asked the City Council to deny this resolution which would approve the appeal and expressed concern that the Planning Commission wasn’t a fair process because LCLC wasn’t contacted; the project pictures didn’t show the school sign, 2 playgrounds and 3’ foot fence that drive-thru would butt up against. Ms. Borchardt reminded Council of their mission statement, stated outdated CEQA should be updated since it was from 1998; the City’s municipal code is discriminatory and biased against religious groups and private schools because the project isn’t required to describe the nearby school but would have to describe if it was a public school; and she stated the Planning Commission Chair admitted in a meeting after they approved the project that they could have deferred action to encourage discussion between the applicant and LCLC. She concluded by encouraging the Council to deny resolution and if the project moves forward then the developer should be required to move playgrounds and put in bathroom and drinking fountain for LCLC.
2. Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated the project needs tweaking because when he read the agenda title the resolution is to deny the appeal and didn’t include a resolution to approve. He concluded that page 5 of staff report was even more telling because there is only one alternative so clearly staff has made up their mind and asked why the City was waiting to install a signal light at Oak Tree Lane as requested in earlier public comment.
3. Fran Neves, a Lincoln resident, questioned if the appellant has to pay the cost of appeal and who Council is responsible to since there have been four near fatal accidents at the Oak Tree Lane intersection and she doesn’t understand why the signal light is dependent on the Hidden Hills residential project.
4. Jennifer Tandy, LCLC Administrative Staff, stated that being a LCLC Academy member means she has to do her part to communicate effectively. She appreciated the City facilitated meeting with Staff and Mr. Sullivan, project applicant, but apparently LCLC representatives weren’t being heard because they had been asked to give up the wall of separation so the meeting turned from an opportunity to a disappointment. She concluded by reiterating the 8’ wall separating LCLC from the project needs to be put in design and communication needs to be reaffirmed.
Mayor Joiner closed the public hearing at 7:03pm and opened the project applicant rebuttal period.
APPLICANT REBUTTAL (not to exceed 3 minutes)
Mr. Alvarnaz responsed to some of the concerns: a CUP requirement for the 3,200sf drive-thru site was a condition of Planning Commission approval and is required because a user hadn’t been determined yet and any issues with the drive-thru could be raised at the CUP public hearing. He continued the wall separating the two sites is included in the conditions of approval, number 14, and the applicant is happy to provide, but their understanding was that Planning Staff had offered a visually transmissible barrier as an alternative to give more security by knowing what is going on the other side of wall. Mr. Alvarnaz disagreed that the Planning Commission was discriminatory; he stated it was an emotional Planning Commission meeting but Robert Poetsch, Senior Planner, explained the project repeatedly and the Planning Commission made a fair determination. He concluded that the site is designed for village commercial and the entire proposal is within approved zoning code and he doesn’t see substance to requesting additional CEQA component, but project has been ongoing since 2006
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
so perhaps there could have been better communication but they are always happy to work with neighboring property owners.
APPELLANT REBUTTAL (not to exceed 3 minutes)
Bill Rath stated a point of disagreement that drive-thru restaurant requires a CUP and/or zoning change and isn’t a standard process for other planning departments and if Council denies the appeal it is a tacit approval of the drive-thru. He continued a different alternative than the 8’ wall was proposed but it is their understanding that the 8’ wall is required because without it their kids would be within touching/reaching distance and although could see better, parents would be concerned someone would offer their kids candy so they don’t agree with an alternative to the wall. He concluded by stating the project needs to be returned to Design and Planning so that the drive-thru could be removed and process for zoning change can happen and the 8’ wall should be included in the design so that it isn’t just a conversation piece so that the requirement is written down. Mr. Rath concluded his comments at 7:10pm.
Sean Scully, City Manager, had two clarifications:
(1) Every city has some cost associated with an appeal for 2 reasons it takes time and cost for due process and if there weren’t a cost then remainder of taxpayers would subsidize appeals. Appeals are a fairly standard practice and Staff went a step beyond because they recognized the appeal was a lot of money so they had a meeting with both the applicant & appellant to see if a resolution could be reached and full appeal cost would have been refunded. (2) Planning Commission approval included condition #10 that required a CUP for a drive- thru restaurant and condition #42 for an 8’ wall between the project and LCLC.
Councilmember Karleskint asked if a drive-thru is allowed by right in the project’s zoning designation and a stated a CUP is required at a future date when restaurant vendor is selected to determine hours, lighting, traffic, etc. Sean Scully, City Manager, stated the Planning Commission would have to make findings for approval of a drive-thru CUP, that it is not an approval by right and typically the CUP runs with the land but the CUP will have to come back to Planning Commission for approval. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding: a refund of the appeal fee was not on the agenda; Council having a narrow scope to make findings and if they can make the findings the appeal is denied; and Planning Commission actions are not part of City Council’s discussion. Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, stated the Council’s job is to consider the evidence and consider whether it supports or doesn’t support the appellant’s points in their appeal application or in their presentation tonight. City Council clarified: where the 8’ wall would be located in relation to the LCLC playground; the project complies with the zoning code and drive-thru restaurant is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit going back to Planning Commission; the 8’ wall is a condition of approval for the project; and the project has been known for a number of years with design elements incorporating design elements of both the Twelve Bridges and Del Webb projects.
Councilmember Lauritsen motioned approval of the resolution which would deny the appeal and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Karleskint. By the following Vote (Approved):
Lauritsen Aye, Karleskint – Aye, Brown – Aye, Joiner – Aye and Andreatta- Recused - RESOLUTION 2023-046 denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission's approval of the Specific Development Plan and Development Permit for the Deer Crossing Retail Center.
Councilmember Andreatta returned to the dais at 7:25pm.
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
9.B. (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) Waive first reading and introduce by title only ORDINANCE 1060B amending Sections 12.02.040, 12.02.130 and 15.04.200 to the Lincoln Municipal Code establishing cause for forfeit of permit deposit or bond and finding the Ordinances are exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Travis Williams, City Engineer, gave a brief staff report and stated contractors will be required to notify the City 72 hours in advance of work to ensure compliance with the City standards.
Mayor Joiner opened the public hearing at 7:29pm with the following comment:
1. Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, asked if the City is providing enough inspectors to respond to contractors with only 72-hour advance notice?
Mayor Joiner closed the public hearing at 7:29pm with no other comments and a brief City Council discussion ensued regarding staffing and response time. Councilmember Brown motioned approval of the first read of the ordinance associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Lauritsen. By the following Vote (Approved): Brown – Aye, Lauritsen Aye, Andreatta- Aye, Karleskint – Aye and Joiner – Aye - ORDINANCE 1060B
amending Sections 12.02.040, 12.02.130 and 15.04.200 to the Lincoln Municipal Code establishing cause for forfeit of permit deposit or bond and finding the Ordinances are exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
9.C. (1) Conduct a public hearing, and (2) Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-047 finding no further environmental review is required pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §§ 15183 and 15162 and adopting the proposed “Rules for the Administration of Agricultural Preserves and the Implementation of the California Land Conservation Act, or Williamson Act.”
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney, gave a brief staff report and stated a Williamson Act policy was requested by the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the pending annexation of Village 5 and a small remaining portion of Village 7. A brief City Council discussion ensued regarding how the proposed policy would affect the County’s existing Williamson Act contracts.
Mayor Joiner opened the public hearing at 7:41pm with the following comments:
1. Albert Scheiber, a Placer County resident, stated his concern that this policy would only apply to a limited number of parcels that exceed 100 acres and the language is confusing, particularly in section 11 of the rules. He continued that he and his neighbors stated their concern prior to approval of Village 5 that fees would increase which this policy shows with the cost to get out of a Williamson Act contract a minimum of $5,000 when it is usually $1,200.
Mayor Joiner closed the public hearing at 7:43pm with no other comments and a brief City Council discussion ensued regarding number of acres set by state statute; the fees to exit a Williamson Act contract would be calculated by the Placer County Assessor; and why this policy was brought forward to City Council to advance in response to LAFCO’s request.
Councilmember Lauritsen motioned approval of the resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Karleskint. By the following Vote (Approved):
Lauritsen Aye, Karleskint – Aye, Brown – Aye, Joiner – Aye and Andreatta- No -
RESOLUTION
2023-047 finding no further environmental review is required pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines §§ 15183 and 15162 and adopting the proposed “Rules for the Administration of Agricultural Preserves and the Implementation of the California Land Conservation Act, or Williamson Act.”
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
9.D. (1) Conduct a public hearing; and (2) Adopt a resolution approving the Ferrari Pavilion Tentative Parcel Map Extension.
Mayor Joiner stated this item has been CONTINUED, DATE CERTAIN, TO MARCH 28, 2023, CITY COUNCIL MEETING and opened the public hearing at 7:46pm with the following comments:
1. Melanie Borchardt, a Lincoln resident, stated her concern with this unimaginative project design at the entrance to the City; the project’s gas station located right next to an education center; and the confusion when this project was heard at the Planning Commission.
Mayor Joiner continued the public hearing at 7:50pm to the March 28, 2023 City Council meeting and stated this item was an approval of a map extension, the project’s design review had expired and will need to go back to Planning Commission for approval.
10. GENERAL BUSINESS
10.A.
Adopt RESOLUTION 2023-048 authorizing the designation of the City Manager, Finance Director, and Public Works Director as the authorized agent to act on behalf of the City of Lincoln, for any and all grant related public financial assistance program documentation required by the United States Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) for federal public assistance and California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) grant programs.
Matthew Medill, Public Works Director, gave a brief staff report and a brief City Council discussion ensued whether each storm event was separate or if the storm in early January was extended. Mayor Joiner opened and closed the public discussion with no comments and called for a motion. Councilmember Karleskint motioned approval of the resolution associated with this item and the motion was seconded by Councilmember Andreatta. By the following Vote (Approved): Karleskint – Aye, Andreatta- Aye, Brown – Aye, Lauritsen Aye and Joiner – Aye -
RESOLUTION 2023-048 authorizing the designation of the City Manager, Finance Director, and Public Works Director as the authorized agent to act on behalf of the City of Lincoln, for any and all grant related public financial assistance program documentation required by the United States Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) for federal public assistance and California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA) grant programs.
11. CITY MANAGER REPORTS
Sean Scully, City Manager, gave a brief update on the City/County 2x2 tax sharing agreement committee and stated a new revenue solution was needed to retain the recently hired firefighters. He also gave a brief report on the Titan Missile Site Environmental Remediation Committee meeting City Council and Staff attended at 1pm on March 8, 2023 at Orchard Creek Lodge, Sun City Lincoln Hills, 965 Orchard Creek Lane, Lincoln, CA 95648
12. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS
Councilmember Andreatta encouraged current City Staff to communicate better with neighbors adjoining new development projects.
City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
March 14, 2023
Mayor Joiner requested a recommendation to not allow a disc golf course in the Auburn Ravine Preserve be on a future agenda but was unable to get consensus so the motion died. Council requested additional information and to have a discussion on a future work session meeting in addition to Park & Recreation priorities.
13. INFORMATION ITEMS
Councilmember Lauritsen stated there were over 400 attendees at the Titan Missile Site Environmental Remediation Committee meeting who were very interested in seeing the site be cleaned up.
14. ADJOURNMENT- adjourned by Mayor Joiner at 8:15PM.
Submitted by Gwen Scanlon, City Clerk
ACTION
SUMMARY
Mar. 14, 2023
Regular
Meeting
¤ Page 1
Minutes – February 28, 2023
Callander Assoc. Amd#1 Henry Rood Park
NOC –Turkey Creek Estates Unit 1B
NOC –Turkey Creek Estates Unit 1C
Pavement Coatings City Parking Lot Resurfacing Agmt.
PCWA MOA, Easements & Water Supply Amd#1
Termination of COVID-19 State of Emergency
Presentation CONSENT
ITEM -- -- -- 8A 8B 8C 8D 8E 8F 8G -- -- -- -- -- -- -- RESO/ORD# -- -- -- -- 040 041 042 043 044 045 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Andreatta -- -- -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Brown -- -- -- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Karleskint -- -- -- 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Lauritsen -- -- -- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Mayor Joiner -- -- -- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y -- -- -- -- -- -- --
ACTION
SUMMARY
Mar. 14, 2023
Regular
Meeting
Deer Crossing Appeal–CONTINUED FROM 2/28/2023
1st Rd – Forfeit Permit Deposit/Bond – Enc Permits
Williamson Act Policy
Ferrari Pavilion Map Extension - CONTINUED TO 03/28/2023
FEMA Authorized Agents
CONSENT Public Hearings General Business CIB
ITEM -- -- -- 9A 9B 9C -- -- -- 10A -- -- -- -- -- --
RESO/ORD# -- -- -- 046 1060 047 -- -- -- 048 -- -- -- -- -- -- Andreatta -- -- -- Recused Y N -- -- -- 2 -- -- -- -- -- -- Brown -- -- -- Y 1 Y -- -- -- Y -- -- -- -- -- --
Karleskint -- -- -- 2 Y 2 -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- --
Lauritsen -- -- -- 1 2 1 -- -- -- Y -- -- -- -- -- --
Mayor Joiner -- -- -- Y Y Y -- -- -- Y -- -- -- -- -- --