Lincoln City Council
November 18, 2025

2025 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT

SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
November 18, 2025

CITY OF LINCOLN
2025 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL /

LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
/ LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
November 18, 2025

AS A COURTESY, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING -COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA-
6:00 PM
*****CHANGE OF MEETING ROOM LOCATION*****
Please note the meeting will be held in the 1st Floor Community Conference Room.

Mayor Holly Andreatta
Mayor Pro Tem Ben Brown Councilmember Whitney Eklund Councilmember Richard Pearl Councilmember John Reedy *****CLOSED SESSION*****
5:00pm
City Hall (CLOSED SESSION)
1st Floor City Manager's Conference Room
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
*****GENERAL SESSION*****
6:00pm
City Hall (Extremely Limited Seating Capacity)
1st Floor Community Conference Room
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
or attend via
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 1
ZOOM
register by using this link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_mvBjLv0XQhGko_wUzBuF-g or participate by calling US: +1 (669) 900-6833
use ID #842 1355 6096
and use *9 to raise hand to speak
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 2

1. CLOSED SESSION - 5:00pm

2. CALL TO ORDER

3. ROLL CALL

4. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION *In person only.

5. GENERAL SESSION - 6:00pm

EXECUTIVE TEAM

Sean Scully, City Manager
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney
Nita Wracker, Asst. City Manager / Finance Director
Matt Alves, Police Chief
Jennifer Brown, Chief Innovation & Tech. Officer
Vin Cay, City Engineer
Erin Frye, Econ. Dev. & Communication Specialist
Kathryn Hunt, Library Services Director
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Matthew Medill, Public Works Director
Veronica Rodriguez, Human Resources Director
Anthony Mejia, Fire Chief
MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide the highest level of service responsive to our community’s expectations and to enhance the quality of life and economic vitality.

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST WITH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):

In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 434-2490. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agenda Availability:

The main posting location of the City Council Agenda pursuant to the Brown Act, Government Code § 54954.2(a) is on the public kiosk outside the entrance of City Hall, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California. City Council Agenda Packets are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California, and “Live and Archived” meetings, minutes and videos are available on the City’s website at www.Lincolnca.gov. City Council Meetings are televised live 6:00PM on Cable channel 18.

Public Input:

Persons wishing to address the City Council are asked to voluntarily complete and submit a speaker card to City staff. Speaker cards are available near the entrance of the meeting location. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item appearing on this agenda will be called upon at the appropriate time during the item’s consideration. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item not appearing on the agenda will be called upon during “Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items.” In either case, please stand to be recognized by the Mayor when your name is called. Please note:
comments from the audience without coming to the podium may be disregarded or ruled out of order. All speakers' time will be limited to three (3) minutes, unless extended by the Mayor. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Mayor and in most cases, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings.

Special Meeting Public Input:

Only issues listed on a special meeting agenda may be addressed pursuant to the Brown Act’s regulation of Special Meetings.

Consent Agenda
: All matters on the Consent Agenda are considered routine business and will be enacted by one motion.

There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the City Council requests a specific item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate action. Any items removed will be considered after the remainder of the Consent Agenda.

Judicial Review
: Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code § 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code § 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the decisions made by the City Council, including any action regarding planning, zoning or environmental decisions, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

1.A
Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, City Designated Representative: Veronica Rodriguez, Organization: Lincoln Police Officers' Association (LPOA)

600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 3

6. INSPIRATION OR INVOCATION

7. CALL TO ORDER

8. ROLL CALL

9. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION (if any)

10. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

11. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS

12. PRESENTATIONS

13. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL *
All speakers' time will be limited to three (3)
minutes, unless extended by the Mayor. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Mayor and in most cases, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings.

14. CONSENT

15. PUBLIC HEARINGS

16. GENERAL BUSINESS

14.A
Approval of Meeting Minutes of the October 28, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting. (Hope Ithurburn)

14.B
Adopt a Resolution Amending both the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvements Program Budget and the 2025-27 Biennium Budget. (Nita Wracker)

14.C
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of Claims for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance Funds for Fiscal year 2025/26. (Nita Wracker)

14.D
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map. (Kaylie Tavenner)

14.E
Adopt a Resolution to (1) Create CIP 722, Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure, and (2) Authorize a Budget Augmentation of $500,000 from the Unencumbered Balance of Fund 7310, Solid Waste Capital. (Jacob Groeser)

14.F
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manger to Execute the Public Facilities Element Fee Credit Agreement with Century Communities of California, LLC for Transportation and Water PFE Facilities associated with the Hidden Hills project. (Nita Wracker)

14.G
Urban Water Management Plan Update 2025. (Chris Nelson)

16.A
Workshop to Discuss Potential Regulation of Tobacco and Vape Products in Lincoln. (Kristine Mollenkopf)
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 4

17. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

18. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS

19. COMMITTEE REPORTS

20. INFORMATION ITEMS

21. ADJOURNMENT

16.B
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Downtown Innovation Hub Partnership with Jessup University. (Sean Scully)

16.C
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Issuance of the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2025. (Nita Wracker)

NOTE:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lincoln's website at
https://www.lincolnca.gov/
subject to staff's availability to
post the documents before the meeting.

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City will provide special assistance for disabled members of the public. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (916) 434-2490. As a courtesy, please make every effort to inform the Clerk of your needs at least 24 hours prior to the meeting so the City may make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (including any action regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Levine Act Provisions --
The Levine Act requires a party (or the party's agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision. This includes contributions to Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners and members of other City boards and commissions.
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 5
SUBJECT:

Conference with Labor Negotiator - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, City Designated Representative:

Veronica Rodriguez, Organization: Lincoln Police Officers' Association (LPOA)
SUBMITTED BY:

City Clerk
DEPARTMENT:

Human Resources
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 1.A

STAFF REPORT
6 SUBJECT:

Approval of Meeting Minutes of the October 28, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting. (Hope Ithurburn)
SUBMITTED BY:

City Clerk
DEPARTMENT:

City Manager's Office
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.A

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

1.DRAFT - MEETING MINUTES, 10.28.2025.docx

STAFF REPORT
7 MINUTES

CITY OF LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Regular Meeting
October 28, 2025

CLOSED SESSION MEETING
The meeting was conducted in person at City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA in the City Manager’s Conference Room.

CLOSED SESSION AGENDA ITEMS
A. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation. City of Lincoln v. The Gathering Inn, et al., Placer County Superior Court case no. S-CV-0053711

1. CALL TO ORDER -The meeting was called to order by Mayor Andreatta at 5:00pm.

2. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Holly Andreatta Whitney Eklund
Richard Pearl
John Reedy

Councilmembers absent: Ben Brown

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION * In person only.

There was no public comment.

OPEN SESSION MEETING
The meeting was conducted in person at City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA, and virtually on Zoom with a Live Stream on the City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18.

4. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Andreatta at 6:03 PM.

5. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Mayor Holly Andreatta Whitney Eklund
Richard Pearl
John Reedy

Councilmember absent: Ben Brown

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – led by Mayor Andreatta.

7. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION – City Attorney reported there was no reportable action.

8. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS – None.

9. PRESENTATIONS – None.

10. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL

The following provided public comment:

Stan Nadar, Lincoln resident
Byron Chapman, Lincoln resident

8

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2025

Seeing no further public comments, Mayor Andreatta closed public comment.

11. CONSENT

Mayor Andreatta asked if any members of the City Council or staff would like to pull any items from the consent agenda; none were pulled.

11.A Approval of Meeting Minutes of October 14, 2025 Regular City Council meeting.

11.B Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-157 Awarding a Construction Contract for the Brentford Circle Trail Crossings Project (CIP 681).

11.C Receive and File the City of Lincoln Quarterly Treasurer’s Report.

11.D Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-158 Accepting the $36,482 FY 25-26 California Library Literacy Services Grant Award and Augmenting the Relevant Revenue and Expense Accounts in Fund 1000.

11.E Waive Second Reading and Adopt ORDINANCE 1100B, the 2025 California Green code, Administrative, Building, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Energy, Residential, Existing Building Code, and Related Construction Codes (LMC Title 15- Building and Construction) as Applicable to all Construction within the City of Lincoln.

11.F Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-159 Authorizing the City Engineer to Install Stop Signs on Bella Breeze Drive at the Intersection with Hammond Street.

11.G Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-160 Approving the Execution of a Construction Contract and Authorizing a Budget Augmentation from Unencumbered Balance of Fund 2410 for the Police Department Parking Lot Expansion Capital Improvement Project (CIP) 626.

11.H Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-161 Approving the Establishment of a Temporary Battalion Chief Position within the Fire Department, and a Budget Augmentation in the Amount of $115,000 to Fund 1000 – General Fund.

11.I Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-162 Approving an Update to Public Facilities Element Implementation Plan and Policies.

11.J Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-163 Approving the Reclassification of One Vacant Administrative Analyst II Position in the Finance Department to the Senior Account Clerk Classification.

Seeing no public comments, Mayor Andreatta called for a motion of approval for the item.

Councilmember Pearl motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Reedy.

Passed by the following roll call vote:

9

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2025

Ayes: Andreatta, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: Brown
Abstain: None

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS

12.A Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-164 and RESOLUTION 2025-165 Approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for the Proposed Parkwood Project.

Mikaela Noble, Associate Planner presented to Council with a brief discussion following. Mayor Andreatta opened the public hearing. The following provided public comment:

Darla Gutierrez, Lincoln resident

Seeing no further public comments, Mayor Andreatta called for a motion of approval for the item. Councilmember Pearl motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Reedy. Passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: Brown
Abstain: None

12.B Receive a Presentation and Hold a Public Hearing on the 2026-2030 Consolidated Plan.

Nita Wracker, Assistant City Manager introduced Frankie Lewington, Consultant with Root Policy Research who presented to Council with a brief discussion following. Mayor Andreatta opened the public hearing.

The following provided public comment:

Reverend Virgil Nelson, Lincoln resident/Placer People of Faith Louise Arquilla, Stand Up Placer
Byron Chapman, Lincoln Resident
Lena Labosky, Lincoln Resident (via Zoom)

Seeing no further public comments, Mayor Andreatta closed the public hearing.

13. GENERAL BUSINESS

13.A Workshop to Discuss a Potential Lincoln Community Awards Program.

Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney presented to Council with a lengthy discussion following.

Mayor Andreatta opened the discussion regarding the agenda item. There was no public comment. Council provided direction to staff.

13.B Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-166 Approving the Issuance of the City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2019-1 (Independence at Lincoln) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2025 (the 10

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
October 28, 2025

“Bonds”).

Nita Wracker, Assistant City Manager introduced Brian Forbath, Consultant with Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP who presented to Council with a brief discussion following. Mayor Andreatta opened the discussion regarding the agenda item. There were no public comments.

Seeing no public comments, Mayor Andreatta called for a motion of approval for the item.

Councilmember Pearl motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Eklund.

Passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: Brown
Abstain: None

14. CITY MANAGER REPORTS
City Manager Scully reminded the community that as the end of the year approaches, along with the holiday season, there will be one City Council meeting in November and one in December. Manager Scully also promoted the upcoming State of the City event and gave kudos to Chief Alves as he was chosen to serve on the State of California’s Fireworks Task Force.

Scully also read a press release regarding the recent arrest of a Lincoln Police Officer and subsequent events.

15. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS
Councilmember Eklund requested Council discuss the unlicensed pop-up food tent issue along with code enforcement efforts and requested staff to create messaging to share with the community clarifying the connection between the City and Western Placer Unified School District (WPUSD) as it relates to residential development and impacted enrollment.

16. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilmember Pearl reported on the recently attended business seminar in downtown Sacramento. Councilmember Eklund reported on a recently attended California Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) conference and her appointment as the Central Region’s Board Director as well as an award that was presented to Placer County’s LAFCO for innovation and planning.

17. INFORMATION ITEMS
Mayor Andreatta reported she was appointed as the President of the Sacramento Valley Division for the League of California Cities.

18. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Andreatta adjourned the meeting at 7:25pm.

Respectfully submitted by Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

________________________________________
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
11 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Amending both the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvements Program Budget and the 2025-27
Biennium Budget. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:

Ruthann Codina
DEPARTMENT:

Finance
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.B

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution amending both the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvements Program budget and the 2025-27 biennium budget.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The purpose of this report is to present an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 CIP Budget previously approved by the City Council on June 27, 2023 along with an amendment to the 2025-27 CIP Biennium budget previously approved on June 24, 2025. Due to various factors, many of the City’s CIPs cross fiscal years and when this occurs, estimates must be used to budget the timing of expenditure appropriations in each of the construction years. At the close of each fiscal year, actual expenditures can be calculated and utilized to adjust the subsequent year’s budgets. This process helps the budget remain as accurate as possible.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

When the new budget is adopted each fiscal year, it is assumed that all budgeted funds for the prior year CIPs would be expended in full. However, the reality of CIP projects is that this is rarely the case and therefore, those unused funds need to be unencumbered from the 2024- 25 fiscal year budget and re-budgeted into the fiscal year 2025-26 approved budget so that these CIPs can be continued and/or completed within the current budget cycle.

Staff has completed a thorough review of the actual expenses posted to each individual CIP for the 2024-25 fiscal year. Based upon this review, several of the CIP budgets that were approved in the 2025-27 budget will need to be adjusted upward to reflect the variance between actual fiscal year end 2024-25 expenses and what was budgeted for 2025-27. There are also instances of CIPs which were completed under budget - these remaining balances will be unencumbered. A detailed list of impacted CIPs is attached for reference.

STAFF REPORT
12 FISCAL IMPACT:

Approval of this amendment will make changes to the budgeted appropriations for both 2024- 25 and 2025-27. There could be a slight impact to fund balance, however that impact will largely be an increase to the unencumbered fund balances as some CIPs ended fiscal year 2024-25 under budget and those unspent funds are rolling back into fund balance. This action primarily shifts appropriations between fiscal year budgets and does not significantly increase or decrease the project budgets or fund balances in total.

The impacts by fund include the following total
decrease
to the 2024-25 adopted Capital
Improvement Program budget:

1000 $ ( 1,336,243)
2150 ( 988,449)
2210 ( 3,389,086)
2230 ( 4,390,078)
2370 ( 64,986)
2400 (16,711,364)
2410 ( 765,334)
2430 ( 398,570)
2440 ( 57,375)
2450 ( 65,810)
2460 ( 7,476,537)
2470 ( 1,383,127)
2480 ( 41,334)
2700 ( 344,728)
2705 ( 266,483)
2750 ( 2,495,695)
2850 ( 28,366)
2870 ( 801,915)
2980 ( 1,260,175)
13 5400 ( 318,975)
5620 ( 1,110,706)
5650 ( 56,700)
6200 ( 220,970)
6300 ( 1,124,941)
7100 ( 33,929)
7110 ( 5,303,079)
7150 ( 3,387,500)
7200 ( 27,707)
7210 ( 1,868,656)
7250 ( 1,092,004)
7300 ( 18,816)
7310 ( 2,282)
7350 ( 277,571)
7400 ( 76,000)
7500 ( 315,144)
7550 ( 791,300)
8920 ( 490,000)

The total impact to the 2024-25 adopted CIP budget is a decrease across multiple funds in the amount of $58,855,320.

The impacts by fund include the following total increase to the 2025-27 adopted Capital Improvement Program budget:

1000 $ 1,218,681
2150 988,449
2210 3,021,326
2230 4,270,674
2370 64,986
14 2400 6,711,364
2410 748,885
2430 348,570
2440 43,671
2450 35,000
2460 5,935,799
2470 1,171,877
2700 344,728
2705 266,483
2750 2,495,695
2850 14,366
2870 726,571
2980 1,251,259
5400 313,564
5620 1,089,448
5650 56,700
6200 189,840
7100 33,929
7110 5,022,995
7150 3,387,500
7200 27.707
7210 1,835.752
7250 1,092,004
7300 18,816
7310 1,022
7400 76,000
7500 310,994
7550 791,300
8920 490,000
15 The total impact to t
he 2025-27 adopted CIP budget is an increase across multiple funds in the amount of $55,644,280.

ATTACHMENTS:
impacted cips.pdf
UPDATED - 2025_CIP_rollover_resolution (1).doc
16 PROJECT PROJECT TITLE
unencumber
24/25
rebudget
25/26
CIP127 Sidewalk Replacement Prog (26,594)$ -$ CIP181 Lakeview Farms Storage Ph 1 (3,786,832)$ 3,786,832$ CIP229 Airport Fuel Island (5,412)$ -$ CIP230 Reconstruct Runway 15-33 (955,597)$ 955,597$ CIP298 Joiner Pkwy Pavement Rehab (93,429)$ -$ CIP329 East Joiner Pkwy Widing (20,273)$ 20,273$ CIP353 Bridge Rehab. McBean Park Dr (1,245,977)$ 1,251,259$ CIP354 Lincoln Blvd Phase 3 (152,345)$ 86,036$ CIP423 PGE R20A Alley btwn 5th & 6th (4,427)$ -$ CIP448 Ashwood WY Drainage improvem. (32,321)$ -$ CIP456 Fiddyment Well Pump Replacemen (40,000)$ 40,000$ CIP463 12 Bridges backstop repair (56,700)$ 56,700$ CIP464 Aldo Pineschi Jr Park (4,864,783)$ 4,864,783$ CIP466 Jimenez ParkingLot Pave (4,858)$ -$ CIP467 Jimenez Ph3 Soccer fields (1,257,137)$ -$ CIP474 AMI Implementation (785,529)$ 785,529$ CIP475 Fire Hydrant replace prog21/22 (225,000)$ 225,000$ CIP476 Verdera N Pressure Reducing (5,595)$ -$ CIP477 UPRR Sewer Rehab (241,458)$ 241,458$ CIP478 East Joiner Pump station impro (622,781)$ 622,781$ CIP484 Water Distrb Rehab - Hoitt (325,407)$ 325,407$ CIP485 Water Dist Rehab - H, I, J Streets (570,469)$ 570,469$ CIP486 Airport Oil/Water Separator (194,304)$ 194,304$ CIP487 Fire Hydrant Replacement Prog (250,000)$ -$ CIP488 Large Meter Replacement (210,000)$ 210,000$ CIP497 Master Plan for Bella Breeze (701,344)$ 701,344$ CIP600 Ferrari Ranch Road UPRR Crossing (750,438)$ 750,438$ CIP601 I & J Street Rehab (2,014,843)$ 2,014,843$ CIP609 McBean Bandstand Electrical (54,628)$ -$ CIP612 Joiner Park shade & picnic (100,000)$ 100,000$ CIP613 Moore Road Class 1 Trail (1,009,992)$ 1,009,992$ CIP615 Road Sealant project (324,569)$ -$ CIP616 SCADA control upgrades (86,200)$ 86,200$ CIP618 Cardboard Recycling Facility (171,995)$ -$ CIP619 Airport Infrastructure Grant (4,578)$ 4,578$ CIP619 Airport Infrastructure Grant (41,198)$ 41,198$ CIP621 PD Server Room A/C upgrade (16,449)$ -$ CIP622 Police IT Room Expansion (139,010)$ 139,010$ CIP624 Beerman Plaza lawn removal (50,000)$ 50,000$ CIP626 Police Parking Lot Expansion (609,874)$ 609,874$ 17 PROJECT PROJECT TITLE
unencumber
24/25
rebudget
25/26
CIP632 City Hall Reorg.Design (348,570)$ 348,570$ CIP635 Bike Lanes 7th/Nicolaus/9th/H (43,274)$ 43,274$ CIP637 Community Center Park (2,369,995)$ 2,369,995$ CIP638 Foskett Park parking lot exp. (300,000)$ -$ CIP642 Split rail fence (12 Bridges) (35,000)$ 35,000$ CIP643 Wilson Park retaining wall (30,810)$ -$ CIP644 Ferrari Ranch Road Widening (9,540,189)$ 9,540,189$ CIP645 NEV & Golf Cart Improvements (161,238)$ 161,238$ CIP646 Annual Sidewalk-Driveway Rep. (112,560)$ 112,560$ CIP647 Curb Ramp Replacement-Install (482,188)$ 482,188$ CIP648 Lincoln Blvd Signal Timing (933,074)$ 933,074$ CIP649 Bicycle Infrastructure (255,264)$ 255,264$ CIP650 Ferrari Ranch Rd Ramp metering (375,000)$ 375,000$ CIP652 Pavement Preservation program (693,807)$ 693,807$ CIP653 First Street pavement pres. (306,056)$ 306,056$ CIP654 Water Dist. Rehab FY23-24 (5,530,205)$ 5,530,205$ CIP655 Lincoln Blvd Corridor Imp Ph4 (576,503)$ 576,503$ CIP656 3rd and L Street Traffic Calming (100,000)$ 100,000$ CIP657 Q St Sewer lift station rehab (469,224)$ 469,224$ CIP658 Sewer Rehab - hot spots (1,105,000)$ 1,105,000$ CIP659 Fire #35 Perimeter Fence (9,905)$ -$ CIP660 Markham Ravine sewer project (400,000)$ 400,000$ CIP661 CDD office space reconf. (41,334)$ -$ CIP662 6th Street Storm Drain Repair (218,750)$ 218,750$ CIP663 E St & 8th St Drainage Improv. (14,000)$ -$ CIP664 Ravine Meadows Floodwall (211,250)$ -$ CIP665 Annual Storm drain replacement (219,793)$ 219,793$ CIP666 Airport hangar and Office (98,665)$ 98,665$ CIP667 Police Facility upgrades (63,583)$ 63,583$ CIP668 Library book lockers (44,671)$ 44,671$ CIP669 Library HVAC controls upgrade (13,704)$ -$ CIP670 City Hall window repair (45,000)$ 45,000$ CIP671 Plaza Building reroof (40,026)$ -$ CIP672 Corp Yard Mechanics area heat (94,840)$ 94,840$ CIP673 Corp Yard gutter replacement (31,130)$ -$ CIP674 Repaint exterior of Airpt off. (4,150)$ -$ CIP676 Civic Center Exterior Painting (15,349)$ -$ CIP677 Community Center roof (19,969)$ -$ CIP678 Parking - Art Bldg & McBean (725,000)$ 725,000$ CIP679 Transit stop upgrades/replace. (76,000)$ 76,000$ 18 PROJECT PROJECT TITLE
unencumber
24/25
rebudget
25/26
CIP681 Brentford Circle Trail Xing (834,057)$ 834,057$ CIP682 E Joiner Pkwy/DW Blvd Intersection (6,146,348)$ 6,146,348$ CIP683 Energy Conservation Project (12,911)$ 12,911$ CIP685 11th Street Storm Drain Repair (64,986)$ 64,986$ CIP694 Industrial Ave Rehab 3,130$ -$ CIPT002 Citywide software (1,124,941)$ 1,124,941$ CIPT006 C/Hall Int. Security Camera (80,000)$ 80,000$ CIPT231 Physical Security Upgrades (595,189)$ 595,189$ CIPT232 Network Architecture Security (200,000)$ 200,000$ CIPT235 PW Work Order System (104,930)$ 104,930$ CIPT241 Fire Station Alerting System (4,757)$ -$ CIPT242 Document Storage refresh (58,875)$ 58,875$ CIPV222 Type 3 Wildland Engine (505,000)$ 505,000$ CIPV230 Roll off collection truck (1,260)$ -$ CIPV232 Dump Truck (58,080)$ 58,080$
CIPV232 Dump Truck (14,000)$ 14,000$
CIPV233 3 Axle Trailer (45,000)$ 45,000$ CIPV402 Type VI Fire Engine (Skeeter) (525,000)$ 525,000$ CIPV404 (2) Fire Dept Pick Ups (19,058)$ -$ CIPV415 Vactor 2100i (19,230)$ -$
CIPV417 Street Sweeper (24,073)$ -$
CIPV418 Flat-bed Truck (81,503)$ -$
CIPV501 F250 - Parks lease (28,732)$ 28,732$ CIPV502 MRL Mini Mac Thermo Striper 4,993$ -$ CIPV503 Ford F350 Utility Truck w/Crane lease (66,880)$ 66,880$ CIPV504 (1) Type I Fire Engine (29,213)$ -$ CIPV509 Chevy Traverse - IT lease (12,000)$ 12,000$ (58,855,320)$ 55,644,280$
19 Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 AND 2025-27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM BUDGETS ACROSS MULTIPLE FUNDS.

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln Biennium budget for fisc al year s 2023-25 was adopted by the City Council on June 27, 2023; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln Annual Biennium budget for fiscal years 2025-27 was adopted by the City Council on June 24, 2025; and

WHEREAS, further review of projected expenditures wi thin the Capital Improvement Program budget for fiscal year 2024-25 indicates the need to amend both the fiscal year 2024-25 and 2025-27 budgets to reflect actual 2024-25 expenditures.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Li ncoln authorizes an amendment to the fiscal year 20 24-25 and 202 5-27 Biennium Capital Improvements Program Budgets across multiple funds.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of August, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

20 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Execution of Claims for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance Funds for Fiscal year 2025/26. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:

Ruthann Codina
DEPARTMENT:

Finance
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.C

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution to approve and authorize execution of fiscal year 2025/26 claims for Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance Funds (STA) in the amount of $4,557,769.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

Each year local transportation funding is made available to local agencies and transit operators through the Local Transportation Fund established by the Transportation Development Act. These funds are for the development and support of public transportation needs and are allocated to areas in each county based on population, taxable sales and transit performance. Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) approves the apportionment and the annual transportation claim from each agency. The claims for the City of Lincoln for fiscal year 2025/26 are as follows:

1 .

Local Transportation Assistance for Transit Contracted Services: $ 45,659 2 .

STA for Transit Contracted Services 24/25 balance: $ 196,882 3 .

STA for Transit Contracted Services 25/26 allocation: $ 413,439 4 .

Local Transportation Assistance for Streets and Roads: $3,901,789

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

The allocation received provides funding to cover all costs associated with the City’s contracted Transit services with Placer County Transit as well as a substantial allocation to the

STAFF REPORT
21 Streets Fund for citywide streets projects.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Upon approval and execution of the Claim, and receipt of the funds, the City will record revenue to the following accounts:

Transit Local Transportation Funds (LTF): 7400 31150 $ 45,626 State Transit Assistance (STA): 7400 32260 $ 610,321 Streets and Roads (LTF): 2230 31160 $ 3,901,822

ATTACHMENTS:

REVISED - TDA_Resolution_25.26.docx
Final FY 25-26 LTF Apportionment.pdf
Final FY 25-26 STA Fund Allocation.pdf
22 Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE 2025/26 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS, BALANCE REMAINING OF 2024/25 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS AND 2025/26 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS TO THE

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY (PCTPA)

WHEREAS, the California Public Utilities Code commencing with Section 99200 and the California Code of Regulations commencing with Section 6600 authorizes local transportation funding available through the Local Transportation Fund established by the Transportation Development Act; and

WHEREAS, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) is authorized to receive and approve all claims for Local Transportation Funds and State Transit Assistance funds.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lincoln does hereby approve the 2025/2026 Transportation Development Act Claim(s) to the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency as follows:

For the fiscal year 2024/25, balance remaining of $196,882 of State Transit Assistance for Transit contracted services. For the fiscal year 2025/26, $413,439 of State Transit Assistance for Transit contracted services, $45,659 of Local Transportation Funds for Transit contracted services and $3,901,789 of Local Transportation Funds for Streets and Roads.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
23 FY 2024/2025 FY 2025/2026 FY 2025/2026
Estimated Fund Revenue Apportionment
Balance Subtotal (1) Subtotal Total
$1,662,406 $33,562,102 $35,224,508

2.36898677% $795,082 $795,082
$132,254 $132,254
TRPA TOTAL $795,082 $927,336
$264 $264
$927,072

97.63101323% $32,111,680 $32,111,680
$1,530,152 $1,530,152
PCTPA TOTAL $32,111,680 $33,641,832
$8,736 $8,736
$475,000 $475,000
$30,603 $632,559 $663,162
$67,480 $1,394,792 $1,462,272
$1,432,069 $29,600,593 $31,032,662
Population FY 2025/2026 FY 2024/2025 Carryover Revenue
January 1, 2025 Allocation Subtotal Apportionment(6) Apportionment PLACER COUNTY 103,305 25.10681424% $7,431,766 $359,547 $7,791,313 AUBURN 13,286 3.22897376% $955,795 $46,241 $1,002,037
COLFAX 1,996 0.48509947% $143,592 $6,947 $150,539
LINCOLN 54,520 13.25031230% $3,922,171 $189,754 $4,111,925 LOOMIS 6,689 1.62566653% $481,207 $23,281 $504,488
ROCKLIN 73,172 17.78341621% $5,263,997 $254,671 $5,518,667 ROSEVILLE 158,494 38.51971750% $11,402,065 $551,629 $11,953,694 TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $29,600,593 $1,432,069 $31,032,662 Revenue Planning Available to
Apportionment Contribution(7) Claimant(8)
PLACER COUNTY $7,791,313 ($311,653) $7,479,660
AUBURN $1,002,037 ($40,081) $961,955
COLFAX $150,539 ($6,022) $225,629
Increased by $81,111 for Colfax/Roseville fund
swap per Resolution 25-22
LINCOLN $4,111,925 ($164,477) $3,947,448
LOOMIS $504,488 ($20,180) $484,308
ROCKLIN $5,518,667 ($220,747) $5,297,921
ROSEVILLE $11,953,694 ($478,148) $11,394,435
Reduced by $81,111 for Colfax/Roseville fund swap
per Resolution 25-22
TOTAL $31,032,662 ($1,241,306) $29,791,356
NOTES:
4) Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation is 2% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction. 5) Community Transit Service Article 4.5 allocation is up to 5% of the remaining apportionment, per PCTPA Board direction.

FY 2025/26 Article 4.5 allocation is set at 4.5%. TRPA Population2 9,984 2.36898677% PCTPA Population 411,462 97.63101323%
TOTAL 421,446 100.00000000%
PCTPA LTF Fund Balance
TRPA LTF Fund Balance
FINAL FINDINGS OF APPORTIONMENT FOR FY 2025/2026
August 2025

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY (PCTPA)
PCTPA Revenue Estimate

PLACER COUNTY LTF REVENUE ESTIMATE

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (LTF)
TRPA Revenue Estimate (2)

2. Western Slope and Tahoe Basin for Placer County as of January 1, 2025, DOF, June 6, 2025.

County Auditor Administrative Costs

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY PCTPA
Sources:

Jurisdiction
PCTPA Administrative and Planning Costs (3)
January 1, 2025 DOF Population Estimates1
Community Transit Service Article 4.5 Allocation (5)
Apportionment of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate Available to Claimant Apportionment of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Revenue Estimate by Jurisdiction Pedestrian and Bicycle Allocation (4)
Percent (%)Jurisdiction

BALANCE AVAILABLE FOR APPORTIONMENT BY TRPA
County Auditor Administrative Costs
1) FY 2025/26 LTF balance based on August 1, 2025 Estimated LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, released May 1, 2025. 8) Assumes 0.5% growth in revenue over FY 2024/25
3) Apportioned per Section 7.1 PCTPA Rules & Bylaws for FY 2025/26 Final Overall Work Program and Budget, May 28, 2025. 2) Tahoe Regional Planning Agency receives funds proportional to its population within Placer County (see box below). 6) FY 2024/25 carryover apportionment (see next page) uses May 2025 DOF population estimates. 7) PCTPA receives 4% of apportionment for regional planning purposes and implementation of federal planning requirements.

Printed:8/8/2025
24 Amount of FY 2024/2025 Carryover:

POPULATION
JURISDICTION January 1,
2025(1) PERCENT
FY 2024/2025

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
TOTAL

CARRYOVER

ALLOCATION
PLACER COUNTY 103,305 25.11% $359,547 $359,547
AUBURN 13,286 3.23% $46,241 $46,241
COLFAX 1,996 0.49% $6,947 $6,947
LINCOLN 54,520 13.25% $189,754 $189,754
LOOMIS 6,689 1.63% $23,281 $23,281
ROCKLIN 73,172 17.78% $254,671 $254,671
ROSEVILLE 158,494 38.52% $551,629 $551,629
TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $1,432,069 $1,432,069
Sources:

2. FY 2024/25 LTF balance based on August 1, 2025 Final LTF Fund Estimate provided by the Placer County Auditor
Calculation of FY 2025/2026 PCTPA LTF Carryover
$1,432,069

1. Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, May 1, 2025.

Using 2025 Population - Western Slope
Printed:8/8/2025
25 $3,267,250
$461,351
$3,728,601
$147,026
$3,581,575
January PUC 99313 PUC 99313
Jurisdiction 2025 Population Population
Population(3)
Percentage Allocation
Placer County 103,305 25.11% $783,389
Auburn 13,286 3.23% $100,751
Colfax 1,996 0.49% $15,136
Lincoln 54,520 13.25% $413,439
Loomis 6,689 1.63% $50,724
Rocklin 73,172 17.78% $554,882
Roseville 158,494 38.52% $1,201,901
TOTAL 411,462 100.00% $3,120,224 Notes: (1) 2025/2026 State Transit Assistance Allocation Final Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025. (2) 4.5% of unencumbered PUC 99313 Allocation is allocated to WPCTSA. (3) Table E-1: City/County Population Estimates January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025, DOF, released May 1, 2025.

PUC = Public Utilities Code
PUC 99314 PUC 99314 PUC 99314 Total
Jurisdiction Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Fare Revenue Jurisdiction Basis(4)
Percentage Allocation Allocation
Placer County $5,410,141 81.9% $377,732 $1,161,120
Auburn $21,830 0.3% $1,524 $102,275
Colfax $0 0.0% $0 $15,136
Lincoln $0 0.0% $0 $413,439
Loomis $0 0.0% $0 $50,724
Rocklin $0 0.0% $0 $554,882
Roseville $1,175,827 17.8% $82,095 $1,283,997
TOTAL $6,607,798 100.0% $461,351 $3,581,575
Notes: (4) 2025/2026 State Transit Assistance Allocation Preliminary Estimate, California State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting, August 1, 2025.

FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC Section 99313 STA Fund Allocation FY 2025/2026 Jurisdiction PUC 99314 STA Fund Allocation PUC Section 99313 +
99314
Less 4.5 Percent Allocation of PUC 99313 to WPCTSA(2)
Total STA Allocation Available to Jurisdictions
August 2025
(EXCLUDING TAHOE BASIN)

PLACER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY
FY 2025/26 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FUND FINAL ALLOCATION ESTIMATE PUC 99313 Allocation
PUC 99314 Allocation
Total STA Allocation(1)
1 8/8/2025
26 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Approving the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map. (Kaylie Tavenner)
SUBMITTED BY:

Kaylie Tavenner
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.D

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution as follows: (1) approving Esplanade Phase 7 Final Map; and (2) authorizing the City Clerk to sign the Clerk’s Statements and record the Final Map.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

On October 27, 2015, the City Council conditionally approved tentative subdivision maps for separate property ownership, collectively known as Phase 1 within the Village 1 Specific Plan area, and includes the following: Enclave at Horizon Edge, Epick 3, La Bella Rosa, and Walkup Ranch. Village 1 Phase 1 is generally located north of McBean Park Drive, south of the future Ferrari Ranch Road extension, and west of the future Oak Tree Lane extension.

Phase 1 was approved for up to 753 Low Density Residential Units and 286 Medium Density Residential Units.

On October 13, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution 2020-179 conditionally approving an amended Small Lot Tentative Map for this Village 1 Phase 1 area, known as the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Small Lot Tentative Map. The Esplanade at Turkey Creek project (Project) will be an age restricted gated community with private streets and utilities maintained by the HOA and approved for 683 Low Density Residential Units and 179 Medium Density Residential Units. Public water and sewer infrastructure within the Project will be maintained by the City.

This Project will include the extension of Ferrari Ranch Road from McBean Park Drive to intersect with the extension of Oak Tree Lane, North of McBean Park Drive. Ferrari Ranch Road and Oak Tree Lane extensions will be public streets and City maintained. Phase 7 subdivision is generally located southwest of the Ferrari Ranch Road and Esplanade Lane intersection. Phase 7 consists of 3 Low Density Residential lots.

Taylor Morrison of California, LLC, is requesting approval of the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

STAFF REPORT
27 The Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map (Attachment 2) was reviewed by the City’s Surveyor for technical correctness and the City Engineer for conformance with the approved tentative map and conditions of approval (Attachment 3).

Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act requires the installation of all public improvements or an agreement with the local agency to secure the installation of these public improvements.

Because the subdivision improvements have been completed for Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7, an agreement is not required. On May 9, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution 2023-067 to file the Notice of Completion and accept the public infrastructure. The one-year warranty period has expired for this project.

The processing of the final map is in conformance with the approved Tentative Map and Conditions of Approval, and conform to the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.

Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The approval of the final map is exempt from further review pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080(b)(1) and CEQA Guidelines sections 15268(b)(3).

FISCAL IMPACT:

City costs for review of the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map were funded pursuant to the City’s master fee schedule with full cost recovery borne by the applicant through funds deposited into Developer Fund 248.

The Esplanade at Turkey Creek project will increase required levels of maintenance associated with open space, parks, streetlighting, stormwater facilities, and sewer and water infrastructure throughout the City. The Project has annexed to CFD 2018-1 (Maintenance Services), Tax Zone 13, to fund the maintenance of open space, landscaping, the neighborhood park, water, sewer, public street improvements on Ferrari Ranch Road, McBean Park Drive and Oak Tree Lane, and drainage improvements along Ferrari Ranch Road and Oak Tree Lane. The Esplanade at Turkey Creek project has also annexed to CFD 2018-2 (Public Services), Tax Zone 6, to provide funding to mitigate the subdivision’s impact on the General Fund. The Home Owners’ Association will maintain the private streets and other infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS:

REVISED - Attachment_1_-_Resolution.docx
Attachment 2 - Esplanade Ph 7 Final Map.pdf
Attachment 3 - Esplanade Ph 7 Final Map Conditions of Approval.pdf 28 Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING ESPLANADE AT TURKEY CREEK PHASE 7 FINAL MAP, AND

AUTHORIZING THE RECORDING OF THE FINAL MAP

WHEREAS, on October 27, 2015, the City Council conditionally approved the Tentative Maps for Epick Three via Resolution 2015 -231, Enclave at Horizon Edge via Resolution 2015-233, Walkup Ranch via Resolution 2015 -227, and La Bella Rosa via Resolution 2015-229; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conditionally approved an amendment to the above referenced tentative maps, combining them into a single project know as Esplanade at Turkey Creek on October 13, 2020 per City Council Resolution 2020-179; and WHEREAS, the owner, Taylor Morrison of California, LLC , has requested the recordation of the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map in accordance with section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map is technica lly accurate as approved by the City’s Surveyor; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map is substantially the same as it appeared on the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Tentative Map and any approved alteration thereof; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that all conditions of approval applicable to the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that all provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and any local ordinances applicable at the time of approval of the Tentative Map have been satisfied; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq., CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080(b)(1) and CEQA guidelines section 15268(b)(3).

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. Pursuant to Section 66474.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the Final Map for Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 is in substantial compliance with the previously approved Tentative Map and all associated condi tions of approval specific to these Final Maps have been satisfied.
29 Resolution No. 2025-

Section 2. The Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map is hereby approved, and the City Clerk is authorized to sign the Clerk’s Statements accepting on behalf of the public, all easements, and relinquishment of groundwater rights.

Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized to proceed with the Recordation of the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Phase 7 Final Map at the office of the County Recorder.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

30 ATTACHMENT 2
31 32
11121413
S.11S.1436
LS197536
R6E
5438RET12N
3" BRASS CAP
S1413 1/4
1959
14 1323 24LS3636
T12N R6E2.5" BRASS DISK
1971 14132324 1423
1413
11 1214 13R.6.E.3636LS T.12.N.

2.5" BRASS DISK
1972
10111514
1514
11142" BRASS CAP1/4
0'300'600'
SCALE: 1"=300'
FINAL MAP NO. ________________ESPLANADE AT TURKEY CREEKPHASE 7PORTION OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 12 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.B.&M.,IN THE CITY OF LINCOLN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

MCBEAN PARK DRIVE
ROAD

OAK TREELANE

FERRARI RANCH
“”
ROAD
RANCH

FERRARI

OAKTREELANE

OVERALL BOUNDARY SHEET
PHASE 7
33 LODGE

FERRARI RANCH ROAD
WAY
48 4775

ESPLANADELANE
FINAL MAP NO. ____________ESPLANADE AT TURKEY CREEKPHASE 7 PORTIONS OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 12 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, M.D.B.&M.,IN THE CITY OF LINCOLN, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 34 ATTACHMENT 3
35 36
37 38

EXHIBIT A
The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek project is approved subject to the attached conditions of approval:

39 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

The Esplanade at Turkey Creek Project, located within the Village 1 Specific Plan in the City of Lincoln , on various Assessors’s Parcel Numbers, generally located north of McBean Park Drive, south and east of Ferrari Ranch Road, and west of Oak Tree Lane , is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:

** (Double Asterisk) located in front of the Condition is specific to the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Project.

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

1. The ability to proceed under any appro vals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action, including the recordation of Final Map, are contingent upon compliance with the terms and conditions of the Annexation Process from Placer County, the Village 1 Specific Plan and the terms and c onditions of the General Development Plan.

General Condition City of Lincoln

2. All development within the Village 1 Specific Plan area is subject to compliance with Mitigation Measures contained within the Village 1 Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2010102018).

General Condition City of Lincoln

3. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its Planning Commission, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

General Condition City of Lincoln

4. The Applicant shall pay the City’s actual costs of providing entitlement processing Plan review, Final Map review, GIS, administrative fee, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct b illing for contract professional services.

General Condition City of Lincoln
40 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

5. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement is being executed with the City o f Lincoln, which incorporates changes associated with this tentative map for Taylor Morrison to combine into this single project, Esplanade at Turkey Creek, all of the projects north of McBean Park Drive, south and east of Ferrari Ranch Road and Auburn Rav ine, and west of the future extension of Oak Tree Lane. Such Development Agreement shall be executed prior to City Council approval of any Final Map and may establish obligations to be completed prior to approval of any Final Map.

General Condition

City of Lincoln

6. The design, maintenance, inspection, and reporting of all storm water systems, devices, and treatment systems by the Applicant/HOA shall be in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2013 - 0001-DWQ Natio
nal Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Phase II Municipal General Permit No. CAS000004, Waste Discharge Requirements for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and any design guidance developed by the City.

General Condition
On-going

Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

7. The installation timing of specific offsite improvements associated with the project have been established in the Development Agreement, for Esplanade at Turkey Creek.

General Condition Community
Development
& City
Engineer

8. If there is a conflict between the Project Development Agreement and the Conditions of Approval, the Development Agreement shall prevail.

General Condition City of Lincoln

9. As set out in the City’s Public Facilities Element Fee (PFE program) the project is subject to I nfrastructure and Capital Facility Impact Fees categories includ ing but not limited to , Wastewater Fee; Reclaimed or Raw Water Fee; Drainage Fee; Water Fee; Transportation Fee; and Community Services Fe es which includes Parks, City Administration, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, and Library.

General Condition Finance
41 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

10. The project shall comply with requirements of SB 5 (200-year flood protection) and regulations and guidelines published by the State Departmen t of Water Resources, and as may be adopted by the City of Lincoln in compliance with the requirements of SB 5.

General Condition Development
Engineering

11. The Small Lot Tentative Map shall be subject to those provisions set forth in the approved General D evelopment Plan for the Plan Area, adopted by Ordinance No.873 B and Amended 886 B , and the currently proposed amendment associated with this Map, if approved by the City Council.

General Condition Development
Engineering

12. The conditions of approval for t he Tentative Maps supersede any and all conflicting notations, and information which may be shown on said Maps.

General Condition City of Lincoln

13. The Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for two years from the date of City Council approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently approved per Government Code Section 66452.6(e), or extended by the terms of a Development Agreement.

General Condition City of Lincoln

14. All improvements and construction within the project shall be consistent with the Esplanade at Turkey Creek Tentative Subdivision Map and the Village 1 General Development Plan.

General Condition City of Lincoln

15. One or more residential small lot map s may be recorded concurrent with or subsequent to the recordation of the Large Lot Final Map.

General Condition Development
Engineering

16. **Conditions of Approval noted herein generally apply to the recordation of all Small Lot Final Maps. However, the City retains the right to defer, at its sole discretion, certain Conditions of Appro val when it determines that such conditions are not relevant to recordation of a Final Map. In such cases, compliance with related Conditions of Approval shall be deferred to recordation of other Small Lot Final Maps within the subject Large Lot Map.

General Condition Development
Engineering

42 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

17. Unless otherwise addressed in the Development Agreement, the design and construction of all improvements shall conform to the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards, or as modified by these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer and/or Community Development Director.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering
& City
Engineer

43 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

18. Unless other wise addressed in the Development Agreement, t he Tentative Subdivision Map allows for the project be developed in phases. Prior to the submittal of Improvement Plans or final map , the Applicant shall submit a phasing plan that includes lots, street, utilities, etc. The City Engineer and Community Development Director will review the proposed phasing plan for the project and determine the extent, timing and installation requirements of public facilities necessary to the provision of public services to the subject parcel. The determination of the City through its City Engineer and Community Development Director will control, limited to the following criteria: any phase that serves more than forty -five (45) units shall provide two points of vehicular access, one of which can be a temporary road if such road does not provide the ultimate second point of residential access, and shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; provide a looped water system capable of achieving fire flow, maximum day flow and pressure as required by the then current Improvement Standards; provide a sanitary sewer system which could consist of gravity mains and is connected to the wastewater treatment plant; provide a storm drainage system (including storm water quality facilities) to adequately convey s
torm water to an ultimate discharge point shown on the
storm drainage master plan or to an interim discharge point consistent with the extension to the ultimate discharge point; or to require improvements necessary to comply with any other Federal, State or local agency requirements applicable to the project. All phases of development will require final approval by the Community Development Department , Police, and Fire Chiefs based upon the ability to access each phase for regular and emergency City services, as well as the provision of needed public utilities.

The City reserves the right to require improvements outside of each phase if deemed appropriate to achieve needed levels of service for each phase.

Phasing plan shall be
submitted for review
prior to improvement
plan submittal
Community
Development
& Engineering

44 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

19. Improvements to backbone infrastructure (McBean Park Drive, Ferrari Ranch Road, and Oak Tree Lane) shall be designed and constructed consistently with the development standards and phasing requirements outlined in the Village 1 Specific Plan, Infrastructure Master Plan and Financing Plan, and as substantiated by a supplemental traffic analysis. The Infrastructure Master Plan and Financing plan identify the interim and ultimate Village 1 improvements as well as installation timing, and signal installation triggers.

These Plans, together with the project DA, shall specify the Applicant’s financial responsibility toward the ultimate improvements and minimum in terim improvements required with this project. Any interim improvements must be proposed in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
Finance

DEVELOPMENT STUDIES/MITIGATION

20. Demonstrate compliance with the approved Master Plan for Village 1 Specific Plan water study and any updates with the 1
st submittal of Improvement Plans
to be approved by the City Engineer . The project design shall also plan to connect with existing w ater lines extending to the property, provide appropriately-sized stubs for future connections for adjacent properties, and shall size the internal network of the project to consider the water needs of future development of those parcels.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

21. Demonstrate compliance with the approved Master Plan for Village 1 Specific Plan sewer study and non-potable water study and any updates with the 1 st
submittal of Improvement Plans to be ap proved by the City Engineer . The project shall provide appropriately -sized stubs for future connection of adjacent properties and provide excess capacity in the project sewer lines for all current and anticipated upstream sewer shed areas.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

45 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

22. Demonstrate compliance with the approved Master Plan for Village 1 Specific Plan master drainage study and any update with the 1st submittal of Improvement Plans and approved by the City Engineer. The project shall plan to provide appropriately-sized stubs for future connection of adjacent properties and provide excess capacity in the project drainage lines, channels, detention basins and water quality features for all current and anticipated upstream drainage shed areas. The project shall provide a site -specific storm drainage report, with corresponding supporting analysis, to show compliance.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

23. With each pha se of development, the Applicant shall submit a soils report prepared by a soils engineer for the development including the park sites. The report shall identify any grading and/or foundation soil problems on the lots and recommend any necessary corrective action to be taken. The reports shall be submitted with the G rading Permit or Improvement Plans whichever occurs first. The reports shall include sub-grade soil evaluation for roadway design and provide suggested structural road sections.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

24. For those improvements that affect regulated resources, the Applicant shall have secured all required Environmental and Mitigation Permits for offsite improvements prior to City approval o f Plans for the offsite improvements affecting the regulated resources.

Prior to approval of
offsite Improvement
Plans that affect
regulated resources.

Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

25. The Applicant shall provide the City with a copy of the approved 404 Permit and a 401 Certification to the Community Development Department. The boundaries of the sensitive areas and the boundaries of the permitted area shall be shown and labeled on the improvement plans.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
that affect the
regulated resources
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

26. The Applicant shall comply with the City of Lincoln Tree Preservation Ordinance and retain an Arborist to recommend mitigation measures if construction encroaches within the Oak tree dripline area.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Planning
46 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

27. **The Applicant shall prepare and submit for Community Development Department review an analysis of the grading around the proposed DiGiordano parcel and its effects on the Village 1 Specific Plan Drainage Master Plan (DMP).

The analysis shall compare the hydraulic results of the proposed grading with the results in the DMP and describe the impacts of the change. If the analysis demonstrates the proposed grading is not consistent with the impacts and
mitigations described in the DMP, the Applicant shall amend the Village 1 DMP to reflect the proposed grading around the DiGiordano parcel.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and any Final Map
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

TRANSPORTATION/STREET IMPROVEMENTS

28. **The following traffic indexes (TI) shall be used for roadway design:

Minor Residential TI = 6.0
Entrance streets TI = 6.5 Ferrari Ranch Road and Oak Tree Lane TI = 7.5 McBean Park Drive TI = 11
Emergency Access TI = As recommended by soils engineer & accepted by City.

(Entrance street defined: serves at least 100 homes.)
Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

29. **The Interim Entrance on McBean Park Drive at Red L ake Way shall allow right turn in and right turn out, only. Design and construct acceleration and deceleration lanes for the entry. This Interim Entrance shall remain in place until the City Engineer is satisfied that Oak Tree Lane and the streets that connect to Oak Tree Lane are constructed and accepted by the City. This interim entrance may be replaced with the lots shown on the tentative map after the City Engineer has been satisfied with the acceptance of the other streets described above.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

47 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

30. **Private entry gates shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of City Fire and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and construction
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

31. **Design and construct full improvements including off -street multi -use trail on Ferrari Ranch Road and on Oak Tree Lane within the area north of Marlett e Way as well as the row of lots on the south side of Marlett e Way. Phasing of the design and construction of the improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Full landscaping improvements adjacent to Ferrari Ranch Road and Oak Tree Lane shall be designed and included with the Improvement Plans for the adjacent streets. Construction of landscape improvements shall be limited to irrigation system, trees, ground cover plants, and mulch. If landscaping is deferred to City approval, funds shall be deposited t o complete the installation at a later date. The Applicant shall deposit with the City the estimated cost for the City to complete the landscaping at a later date to be determined by the City. The final 2 inch lift of AC paving may be constructed with improvements for the bridge across Auburn Ravine at the discretion of the City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

32. **Provide turn lane storage analysis to determine length of turn lanes for both interim improvements and ultimate improvements at Oak Tree Lane/McBean Park Drive, , and Ferrari Ranch Road/Oak Tree Lane, as well as on Oak Tree Lane at the entry streets.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Public Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

33. **Oak Tree Lane, Ferrari Ranch Road , McBean Park Drive and typical Village entrance streets shall be posted as “No Parking”.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements.

Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

34. **Demonstrate that Oak Tree Lane right-of-way can be constructed pursuant to the amended Village 1 General Development Plan.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

48 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

35. **The Applicant shall design and construc t improvements on the north leg of Oak Tree Lane at McBean Park Dr intersection that meet the City General Plan Policy of Level of Service (LOS) C under 2050 projected conditions. Applicant shall submit a traffic analysis acceptable to the Community Devel opment Department, that demonstrates that the proposed improvements will comply with the General Plan Policy LOS C. The traffic analysis shall be based on the most recent Placer County Travel Demand Model using 2050 plus project traffic demands. The Appl icant shall design and construct, if not already existing, improvements on the south leg of the intersection to accommodate existing plus project projected traffic and align with improvements on the north leg.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans or
approval of any Final
Map that includes the
intersection. Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
Community
Development
and
Engineering
Departments

36. Traffic striping, markings and signing shall be provided as required by the City’s then current Standards and Specifications. A striping plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval with each phase of Improvement Plans.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

37. Permanent emergency vehicle access points, (EVA) shall be constructed in a minimum 20-foot wide easement with 12 -foot wide or as approved by the Fire Department and Community Development Department, pavement and aggregate base and 2-foot wide aggregate base shoulders and shall be provided with a minimum verti cal clearance of not less than 13 -feet 6 -inches (13’ -6”).

Structural section shall be determined during design. Gates, if installed in the easement, shall swing in the direction of travel and shall not impede access. A Knox Company padlock to be provided on all easement gates.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

38. The Applicant shall design and construct ADA compliant ramps to allow movement of bicycles from sidewalks to on -street bike lanes where bike/trail routes merge with frontage sidewalks.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

39. Street names shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The applicant shall work with the City to determine appropriate names to be incorporated into street names as feasible.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Small-Lot Final Map
Planning
49 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

UTILITIES

40. If required, the Applicant shall design and construct water sampling stations at locations approved by the City Engineer to allow for sampling of the water supply system, pursuant to the State of California and the City of Lincoln.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

41. ** The Applica nt shall design and construct a water transmission main connected to the existing 24 -inch in McBean Drive, as a primary water supply from which the requirements of a looped water system for phasing, may be satisfied. The size and location of the new water transmission main shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Department.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

42. The Applicant shall comply with all pro visions of the City’s Cross Control and Backflow Prevention Ordinance.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans &
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

STORM WATER QUALITY/GRADING/DRAINAGE

43. For projects or development ap plications less than 1 acre, t he Applicant shall submit an erosion control program with I mprovement Plans to the City for review and approval and shall implement the approved Plan. The P lan shall identify protective measures to be taken during excavation, temporary stockpiling, any reuse of disposal and r e-vegetation. Specific techniques may be based on geotechnical reports, and shall comply with the then current City standards. During construction of any portion of phase of the project, no disturbed area s shall be left exposed for extended periods of time. The City Engineer will determine the timing and extent of re- vegetation required during approval of Subdivision Improvement Plans.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

50 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

44. The project, with each phase, shall include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage -way crossings. Culvert sizes must meet the design requirements and be approved by the City Engineer. Culvert alignment shall match the directional trend of the natural channel as closely as possible at both the upstream and downstream sides of the roadway. At the Applicant’s option a bridge may be substituted for any culvert crossing.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

45. Design and construct temporary culverts over natural channels for any stream crossings used during the construction phase. Construction equipment and vehicles must not cross streams without a proper temporary culvert crossing.

Any temporary crossing of a stream or channel shall be restored to its natural condition and in compliance with all permits, including environmental permits.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

46. In accordance with the City’s then current standards, no disturbed surface or soil shall be left standing through a winter season without erosion control measures, such as re-vegetation of exposed slopes. Temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales, etc.) shall be employed at the base of disturbed slopes until re-vegetation is established.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

47. Design and construct energy dissipaters where drainage outlets discharge on erodible soil or into natural drainage ways. Temporary dissipaters may be used for temporary storm runoff outlets during construction phase; permanent dissipaters shall be included for permanent outlets, unless the E rosion Control P
lan indicates the conditions that render it unnecessary (subject to the approval of the Community Development Department). Outfall and intake structures shall have a concrete base that will reduce the growth of vegetation into the structure.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

48. **The ponds, swales, and drainage pipes on the east and west sides of Oak Tree Lane shall be designed as separated systems
between the NID
infrastructure and the City drainage facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This may result in modifications to the piping shown on the tentative map to provide preferred separation.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

51 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

49. **The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that the on -site system and the system downstream have adequate capacity, and the drainage study shall analyze the downstream systems to ensure adequate c apacity. Upsizing of downstream pipe systems may be required, such as on McBean Park Drive.

Identification of ownership of the downstream pipes and outfall locations may be necessary.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

50. **Design and construct ramps and landings at the top of all outfall and intake structures such that a backhoe can remove debris from the top of the structure during a wet event
to the satisfaction of the City Engineer/Public Works
Director. Fencing/fall protection/gates may be required. Applies for everything above 12” or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

51. **Design and construct ramps into the Basin that comply with City Standards, such that all areas at the bottom of the Basin are accessible to maintenance vehicles and equipment. More than one ramp may be needed at pond s to provide such access. If the pond is used for detentio n/retention or hydromodification that include infrastructure and materials that require maintenance repair and replacement by the City, this is required.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

52. The Applicant shall submit a post construction Storm Water Quality Plan with the project drainage study. The project shall comply with the City Ordinance, California MS4 permit requirements or any other State mandated requirements.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

53. Locate and properly abandon under permit to the Placer County Environmental Health Department all septic systems and wells, prior to map recordation.

Prior to abandoning any existing agr icultural wells, the Applicant shall use water from the agricultural wells for grading and construction of the project or its phases.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements or as
determined on
Improvement Plans
for those not in active
use
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

FLOODPLAIN/WETLANDS
52 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

54. The Applicant shall prepare prior to each phase of Improvement Plan submittal a detailed analysis of the designated 100 -year floodplain in the project area to determine the flood -prone areas and base flood elev ations, if not already available. Floodplain elevations must be determined prior to the approv al of a Final Subdivision Map. The Applicant shall be responsible for any costs associated with the need to file requests to FEMA for map changes, i.e.

CLOMR or LOMR, subject to any third party reimbursement as may exist. The Applicants to provide all data and mapping necessary to amend the City's FEMA mapping and fund all requests for amendments.

CLOMR; submitted
prior to Construction
of any improvements
within the existing
100-year floodplain
LOMR; submitted
prior to Acceptance of
improvements within
the existing 100-year
floodplain
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

55. Any proposed facilities to be located in flood -prone areas must be constructed in conformance with City standards, Village 1 Specific Plan and/or FEMA criteria for floodplain development, including requirements that urban development not alter the base flood elevation as shown in the Auburn Ravine and South Lincoln Master Drainage Plan and the CLOMR submittal for the Auburn Ravine.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

FIRE

56. The final design, layout and line capacity of water and hydrant systems will be subject to approval of the City Engineer in consultation with the Fire Chief prior to start of any phase of underground utility construction.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

57. The final placement of fire hydrants shall be subject to the approval of th e Fire Chief during the review of Improvement Plans and consistent with the then applicable improvement standards for the City.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

58. Consistent with the locations provided in the approved Tentative Map, emergency access ways , gated entries, and pedestrian connections will be reviewed with Improvement Plans and be approved by the Fire Department, Community Development Department, and City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

TRAILS
53 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

59. In conjunction with the construction of each phase of development, the Applicant shall design and construct all on-street and off-street pedestrian/bike trails and NEV lanes associated with that portion of the project. Plans for such trails shall be submitted to the City for approval in conjunction with Subdivision Improvement Plans for that phase. The City retains the right to request the completion of on-site trails that extend outside any one phase of development, or adjust its location, if the City determines that it is reasonably necessary in the interest of safety, public recreational needs or to reach a logical termination point to complete a trail or to connect it to another trail system. Trail requirements shall be consistent with Infrastructure Master Plan for Village 1.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

60. The Applicant shall prepare Improvement Plans and construct improvements for the dedicated landscape corridors, trails , walls and fencing, and other open space facilities, according to the approved Tentative Map, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Landscape and Trail plans shall be approved with the Public Improvement Plans.

The following specifications shall be applied to trails in the project:
• Trails must be located to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, consistent with the Specific Plan and 404 and 401 permits as applicable. • Provide a striped pedestrian crossing for the trail system when it crosses a public right-of-way.
• Applicant shall install all required signage for the trail.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements.

Planning &
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

61. The Applicant shall design and construct open fencing along all open space, drainage corridors, and parkways consistently with the General Development Plan, constructed in accordance with Plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer or designed and constructed as identified in the Army Corps of Engineers approved Open Space Management Plan.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Community
Development,
Engineering

LANDSCAPING
54 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

62. The Landscaping Plans shall include drought tolerant, low maintenance re - vegetation and landscaping plans and specifications for landscaped corridors/landscaped medians, common parking lots, prepared by a registered landscape architect. The Plans shall to be the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, City Engineer/Public Works Director. The Plans shall be consistent with the General Development Plan and should blend the project into its natural environment and reflect a design which is sensitive to water use, fire hazards, wildlife and view sheds. The Plans shall be consistent with the City Standards and shall
include but not be limited to: planting plans,
species lists suited to Lincoln’s climate and soil conditions, Irrigation Plans and wa
ter usage calculations consistent with AB 1881 regarding water conservation, backflow devices for potable water uses, stabilization measures for cut and fill slopes, soil preparation methods.

The project may be required
to incorporate the use of non-potable water into the Irrigation Plans, if available. In instances where non-potable water is used, the piping and design specifications shall be standards approved by the Community Development Director and City Engineer.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements

Planning,
Development
Engineering, &
City Engineer

63. Where non-potable water is to be used, all provisions for its use are to be in accordance with the California requirements and subject to the City Engineer’s approval. The Community Development Director shall be notified 72 hours in advance of any new construction being undertaken for landscaped areas using non-potable water.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and during
Construction
Development
Engineering

LIGHTING/DESIGN
55 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

64. A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted to the City with Improvement Plans prior to construction of each project phase. All street lights shall be LED and Smart Metered to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street light poles where located in public right-of-way and maintained by City, shall be concrete and/or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All street lights shall be in accordance with the Village 1 General Development Plan and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The selection of the lights and design of the lighting system shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer.

Streetlights and similar fixtures shall be directed away from residences. With private streets on site that will be maintained by the HOA, the illumination levels must comply with City Standards, however the street light poles and luminair es can be non -standard, subject to approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Director . Stre et lights along Ferrari Ranch Road, McBean Park Drive and Oak Tree Lane must comply with City Standards.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

65. The Applicant shall review options with the Community Development staf f to minimize visual impacts and reduce monotonous sound walls and design and construct landscape corridor walls of masonry construction using graffiti resistant materials. Wall design and materials shall be subject City’s approval and according to the de sign standards in the General Development Plan and noise mitigation.

Prior to Improvement
Plans and Acceptance
of Improvements.

Engineering &
Planning

66. **The Applicant shall pay all Nevada Irrigation District (NID) cost of coordination for replacement and relocation of NID facilities affected by the project as agreed to by Applicant and NID, subject to reimbursement per the Village 1 Financing Plan.

Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
Community
Development
Director

IMPROVEMENT PLAN NOTES
56 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

67. Dust control measures shall be established prior to construction of any phase of development pursuant to the requirements of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan.

Additional dust control measures may be required b y the City based upon site conditions.

The following note shall be added to the Grading and/or Improvement Plans:
“To minimize dust/grading impacts during construction the Applicant shall:
a. Spray water on all exposed earth surfaces during clearing, gr ading, earth moving and other site preparation activities throughout the day. b. Use tarpaulins or other affective covers on all stockpiled earth material and on all haul trucks.
c. Sweep the adjacent streets frontages at least once a day or as needed to remove silt and other dirt which is evident from construction activities. d. Ensure that construction vehicles are cleaned prior to leaving the construction site to prevent dust and dirt from being tracked off-site. e. The City shall have the authority to stop all grading operations, if in opinion of City staff, inadequate dust control measures are being practiced or excessive wind conditions contribute to fugitive dust emissions.
f. The grading shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program.” Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

68. A note shall be added to the Grading Plans that states:
“Prior to the commencement of grading operations, the contractor shall identify the site where the deficit earthen material shall be borrowed. A report i
ssued by a geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to verify that the imported materials are suitable for project fill. If the borrow site is within the City of Lincoln, the contractor shall show proof of all approved Grading Plans.

Haul routes to be used shall be approved by the City Engineer.” Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

57 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

69. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Construction in the project shall take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, unless written approval is granted by the Community Development Department allowing work for different days or hours.”
“Radios and other musical equipment noise shall be played at levels consistent with the City of Lincoln standards so as to be contained on-site.” Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

70. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All contractors are required to deliver all construction related refuse collected in debris boxes to the Western P lacer Waste Management Authority Material Recovery Facility. The City reserves the right to require that a franchise agreement be approved with any refuse handler at any time during the construction process.”
Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

71. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Seventy-two (72) hour notification must be given to the City of Lincoln prior to disinfection of any water mains. The contractor shall call the Public Services Department at 434-2450 to schedule disinfection and testing.” Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

72. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall submit Environmental surveys in compliance with the mitigation measures. The Ap plicant shall secure Community Development Department (Planning) approval that surveys are adequate and mitigation measures are incorporated into the Plan prior to start of any on -site construction.”
Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering &
Planning

58 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

73. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall require their contractors to work with the Police Department in the development of security measures during construction to increase security of stored equipment an d materials on -site and to minimize demands on police protection services during project construction.” Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Development
Engineering

74. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All construction contractors shall pro vide a Spill Prevention and Counter Measure Plan describing measures to insure proper collection and disposal of all pollutants handled or produced on the project site during construction, including sanitary wastes, cement, and petroleum products. The Plan shall be submitted to the City’s Fire Department and Community Development Department prior to each phase of construction.”
Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and during
construction
Development
Engineering

GRADING

75. The Applicant shall submit Blasting Plans (if required) for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing any on -site blasting activities. At a minimum, the Plan is to include a description of the work to be accomplished, a statement of the necessity to accomplish the work, a description of alternatives to blasting considered but rejected, a description of steps taken to avoid hard rock areas, safety measures to be implemented. The Plan is to coordinate blasting activities with the Police, Community Development Departmen t, and Fire Departments and specify the time and duration proposed for the activity.

The Applicant shall provide 72 hours notification to the above Departments of any scheduled blasting.

Prior to any blasting
activities
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

76. The Applicant shall provide a grading and erosion control security in accordance with the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual.

Prior to the issuance
of the Grading Permit.

Development
Engineering

59 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

77. Flagging, fencing, signage, and ot her devices shall be installed prior to grading on-site. Fence locations shall be to the approval of the Community Development Department and shall require inspection prior to start of grading.

Fencing should not be removed unless written approval is obt ained from the Community Development Department.

Prior to Grading
on-site
Development
Engineering

78. Trees removed during site grading and construction shall be disposed of by means other than landfill or onsite burning.

Prior to Grading
on-site
Development
Engineering

79. Trees not scheduled for removal adjacent to construction areas shall be temporarily fenced around their drip lines to prevent inadvertent damage during construction activity.

Prior to Grading Development
Engineering

FINAL MAP

80. The Applicant shall submit Joint Trench Plans for review by City Engineering Prior to Acceptance of Improvements or Final
Map whichever comes
first
Development
Engineering

81. Prior to the approval of each Final Map, the Applicant shall enter into a standard City Subdivision Agreement with the City identifying the public improvements, if any, to be constructed with each phase. The Applicant shall provide security, in one of the standard forms acceptable to the City Attorney and consistent with the Subdivision Map Act guaranteeing construction of the improvements. The City may accept proceeds from any bond sale for security in the manner authorized by Government Code Sections 66462(a)(2)(b) and 66499.5.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

60 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

82. The Applicant shall provide to the Community Development Department copies of the Final Maps for each phase after the City Engineer’s approval but prior to City Council approval:
• Two digital disk copies of the Final Map in DWG format compatible with the City’s mapping and PDF
• One plot or print of the submittal
Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

83. Prior to recordation , the Applicant shall file with the Placer County Clerk, a certificate from the Placer County Tax Collector’s Office indicating that n o liens against the subdivision or any part thereof exist for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes or special assessments collected with taxes, except those not yet due and payable.

Prior to Final Map
Recordation
Development
Engineering

84. Arrangements shall be made by the Applicant during the review of Final Maps by the City for the abandonment of any existing easements and/or right-of-way no longer required as well as arrangements for the dedication of new easements and/or rights -or-way required to carry out project conditions of approval. Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and submitted for review by the Community Development Department.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

85. The Landowner shall convey all groundwater rights to the City of Lincoln with the recordation of any Final Maps or Large Lot Map.

Prior to recordation of
Final Map
Development
Engineering

86. The Owner shall dedicate public utility easements for unde rground facilities of a size established by City Standards and Specifications and consistent with the City’s franchise agreements as part of each Final Map.

Easements for
construction and maintenance of public water and sewer systems shall be granted to the City across all private streets.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

61 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

87. Dedicate rights of ways and easements for public improvements required to serve the lots shown on the small lot final map/s and construct those improvements, includin g landscaping, or enter into a subdivision agreement with bonds, pursuant to Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Concurrent with filing
the Small Lot Final
Map/s with the City
Council.

Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

88. The words “traffic control appurtenances” shall be included in the list of utilities allowed in public easements (PUE’s) located along public roads.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

89. The Applicant shall form or annex to a Drainage Maintenance Assessment District if deemed necessary by the City Engineer to provide for the project’s proportionate share of annual maintenance and operation costs of the City’s retention facilities. The projects share of the annual ma intenance and
operation costs shall be defined in the Development Agreement.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Development
Engineering

90. Prior to the recordation of a final map on any portion of this Property, the landowners shall provide in a written format, ac ceptable to the City Attorney, the landowner’s waiver of their rights to protest the formation of an assessment district, fee district or community facilities district designed to fund the services and infrastructure required for the development of the sit e. The landowners shall retain their rights to protest the amount of the levy of assessments against all or any portion of this property based upon the level of benefit, or the rate and method of assessment, or the method, manner or procedure for calculat ing the assessment, or any other changes in the manner of determining the assessment applicable to all or any portion of the project property.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Engineering &
City Attorney

62 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

91. Subject to Village 1 Financing Plan the Applicant shall provide a funding mechanism for the annual maintenance and operation of public street lights, parks, landscaping, open space, water quality features, storm drain facilities, detention and retention facilities, and traffic signals except those facilities maintained by the HOA. This funding mechanism may consist of a Special Tax, Assessment District, or endowment, at the discretion of the City. If the project is within a current finance mechanism such as the City’s Landscaping & Lighting Assessment Distric
t No. 1, Benefit Assessment District No. 1, or CFD an
expenditure/revenue analysis should be completed if the number of units or amount of public improvements to be maintained have changed since preliminary approval to ensure the project will cover the cos ts of the annual maintenance and operation of the public improvements. Compliance with this condition shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Annually the costs will be allocated proportionately against the individual lots in accordance with the benefits received. Annual adjustments shall be applied in accordance with the Consumer Price Index as determined by the City to adjust the assessment for inflation as needed to meet any actual increased costs. The Applicant shall annex into a public safety CFD as selected by the City at their sole discretion.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements, at the
discretion of the City
Engineer
Development
Engineering

92. The Development Agreement shall address the obligation of the Applicant to reimburse for facilities constructed by third parties which benefit the Applicant, if any.

Prior to Recordation
of Final Map
Development
Engineering

93. As established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, the Applicant will participate in the planning, design, permitting, right-of-way and construction of public capital facilities of city -wide benefit, including, but not limited to, roadway, wastewater, water, drainage, and park capital facilities which are either currently included or will be included in City's PFE Master Improvement List. Applicant shall receive credits applicable towards its PFE Fee obligations in amounts equal to the value established in the City’s PFE Master Improvement List.

Prior to Final Map
approval.

Engineering
63 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

94. Except as otherwise established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, Applicant shall continue to receive the earned PFE Credits until such time as the amount of the credits reaches a zero balance. If t
he amount of Applicant PFE Credits does not reach a zero balance prior to the issuance of the last Building Permit within the project, the City shall transfer the then existing credit balance to an alternative project in the City that is being built by the Applicant within the City. If a credit balance still remains, City will make reimbursement payments to the Applicant on an annual basis to the extent that City's PFE fee account shows a positive balance at the end of each fiscal year until such time that the Applicant's credit balance is retired. A positive balance will occur when PFE Fees collected are not otherwise committed to finance the construction of other PFE Facilities or used to reimburse other landowners for previously installed PFE Facilities on a first - installed, first-reimbursed basis.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Engineering

95. Except as otherwise established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, The Applicant Fee Credits may be applied only to t he Non- Critical Component of the PFE Fees, unless the constructed facility is designated as a PFE Critical Facility. For purposes of calculating and applying Applicant PFE Credits, the City shall maintain a single pooled PFE account for roadway, water, was
tewater and drainage facilities
against which all Applicant PFE Credits for contributing to these facilities may be applied, with the exception of the PFE Critical Facilities. The City shall maintain a separate account for the PFE Community Services Fees.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Engineering
64 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

96. Except as otherwise established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, the City has identified certain public improvements ("PFE Critical Facilities"), which are also PFE Improvements, for which it is essential that their respective components of the PFE Fee be collected from all development at the time of Building Permit, except as may be deferred to Occupancy Permit consistent with City policy. The Applicant shall pay the City that portion of the PFE Fee that corresponds to the PFE Critical Facilities. If the Applicant constructs a PFE Critical Facility, the fee credits specific to the facility may be applied to the critical component.

Prior to Final Map
approval.

Engineering

97. Except as otherwise established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, the Applicant
PFE Credits shall be
personal to Applicant, or successor thereto, who pays for the design and/or construction of the applicable PFE Facilities or services, or advances funds with respect thereto. Such Applicant PFE Credits may be assigned to any successor in interest to the property or builder thereon, provided an assignment (Transfer Agreement) shall be delivered to the City for acknowledgement prior to the time such Applicant PFE Credits are used. If no such written assignment is made to a successor in interest to the property, then the City shall charge such successor the full PFE Fee.

Prior to Final Map
approval.

Engineering

98. Except as otherwise established in the Infrastructure Master Plan, Financing Plan or Project Development Agreement, c onsistent with the PFE Policies, the project may be subject to paying a third -party reimbursement for public
improvements constructed by other project proponents or other development projects. The amounts of the third-party reimbursements shall be calculated by the City if not agreed to by the parties. The Development Agreement will provide for the timing of any reimbursements due to t hird parties and the amounts if known, or best estimates available.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Engineering
65 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

99. The Esplanade at Turkey Creek Development Agreement shall establish the Applicant’s obligation for payment of park improvement impac ts fees. For the Village 1 Regional Park, the Development Agreement shall establish financial assurances for fair share funding, funding of acquisition and any required remediation necessary to allow park construction. The City will require park lands to be suitable for construction of active recreational parks, generally free from conditions or resources that would limit such development.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Community
Development
Department

100. For parks shown on the Tentative Map, the Development A greement shall establish the general character of park improvements, the mechanism by which the parks will be constructed (City constructed or Applicant turn -key construction), the Applicant’s obligation for payment of park improvement impact fees, the timing for park construction and the ultimate owner of project park sites. For the Village 1 Regional Park, the Development Agreement shall establish financial assurances for fair share funding, funding of acquisition and any required remediation necessary to allow park construction.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Planning
101. The Applicant with the assistance of the Fire Department and Community Development Department, shall develop a Wildland Fire Management Program. The Plan shall provide for the maintenance o f undisturbed vegetation in open space areas located on the project site on an annual basis and be submitted to the City Police/Fire Department for approval prior to the recordation of any Small Lot Final Maps.

Prior to Final Map
approval
Fire and
Planning

102. This project will utilize private Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (CC&R’s) due to the private streets, therefore, a copy of the CC&R’s shall be provided by the applicant to the City Attorney and Community Development Department for review and approval prior to recordation of any small lot Final Map.

Prior to Small-Lot Final
Map approval
Planning &
Development
Engineering

66 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
103. A Homeowner Association (HOA’s) shall be established for the project, and the Applicant shall be responsible for all cost of establishing the HOA and initial funding for its operation. The HOA responsibilities for ownership, operation, repair, maintenance, inspection and reporting shall be delineated in the formation documents. Facilities to be owned and maintained by the HOA shall be identified on each Final Map and set of Improvement Plans. Applicant shall grant an easement to the City on the Final Maps for access and inspection of all facilities to be owned by the HOA. The HOA shall indemnify the City and define its liabilities and responsibilities. Once approved by the City as to form and content, the HOA shall be recorded and may not be amended or rescinded without first obtaining approval from the Community Development Department and City Attorney.

Prior to Small-Lot Final
Map approval
Engineering
104. The project is subject to the Village 1 Specific Plan Infrastructure Master and Finance Plan, or the Interim Fee Agreement for the Village 1 Specific Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan , whichever is in affect at the ti me of Final Map approval.

Prior to Small-Lot Final
Map approval
Planning &
Development
Engineering

105. **Construct full improvements to Ferrari Ranch Road/McBean Park Drive intersection with transition to one lane each way north of intersection.

Construct the multi-use trail and fencing along the west side of Ferrari Ranch Rd. Construct drainage improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Provide right of way for Ferrari Ranch Road from Oak Tree Lane to McBean Park Dr, including for expanded int ersection improvements, with phasing approved by the City.

Timing to be
determined prior to
approval of Final Map
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

106. All small lot subdivisions shall be required to submit a Master Tree List Planting Plan for the residential development setting forth front yard trees in accordance with the adopted General Development Plan for Village 1. The Plan shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department.

Prior to Small Lot Final
Map approval
Planning 67
Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
107. After recordation of the Final Map, the Applicant shall provide to the City one copy of the recorded Final Map on Mylar.

Immediately after
recordation of Final
Map
Development
Engineering

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION
108. The Applicant shall apply for and obtain an Encroachment Permit from the Engineering Department prior to any work conducted within the City right -of- way.

Prior to beginning
construction
City
Engineering

109. The Applicant, before performing construction activities within the project area and prior to each phase of development , shall submit a construction schedule to the Fire Department to allow coordination of fire protection services during construction.

Prior to any
construction activity
Development
Engineering
and Fire

110. The Applicant s hall consult/notify with the service provider of Gas, telephone, CATV, and Electrical System Design Departments at the earliest available opportunity concerning all applicable Development Plans, site improvements, and construction schedules. The project sp onsors shall maintain contact with the service provider so that required facilities and easements will be developed in a coordinated manner.

Prior to construction Development
Engineering

111. An on-site meeting with the Applicant, contractor, superintendent, engineers, and City representatives to review special procedures, limits of work, lines of authority and special conditions or procedures shall take place prior to any significant grading activity. The Applicant shall provide an organization chart displaying lines of authority and phone numbers for each individual shown in a supervisory capacity. The Applicant shall designate in writing before the start of work an authorized representative who will have authority to act on behalf of the project. Said representative should be available on the job site during all construction or accessible by phone. The representative shall also make any necessary arrangements with the City Engineer concerning extended or emergency work periods.

Prior to any
construction
City
Engineering

68 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
112. All construction haul routes shall be approved by the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any construction activity.

Prior to any
construction
Engineering
Department

DURING CONSTRUCTION
113. Consistent with the recommendati ons of a soils engineer and as approved by the City Engineer, grading should be scheduled to avoid seasonally high groundwater conditions in swale areas.

During Construction Engineering
Department

114. For each phase of development, the Applicant shall provid e a specific geotechnical analysis to determine the suitability of excavated material (if proposed for use) as engineered fill, and trench backfilling, topsoil, or other types of reuse on -site such as landscaping fill in parks. If during construction the Applicant identifies any unique unforeseen soils conditions, the Applicant shall within 24-hours notify its geotechnical consultant to provide an analysis to the City Engineer for approval concerning any remediation action.

During Construction Engineering
Department

115. If during the course of development , it is determined by the Community Development Director that in order to maintain the construction schedule that a contract mitigation monitoring coordinator is needed, the Applicant will fund the full cost of mitigation monitoring related to the project.

During construction Planning
116. The Applicant shall be responsible for the cleaning of all public streets affected by construction. The manner and frequency of street cleaning shall be determined by the Public Services Department based upon field conditions.

During construction Engineering
Department

69 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
117. For potable construction water, flows shall not exceed 500 gpm and 500,000 gallons per day subject to approval by the City. All flows shall be metered an d monitored by the Applicant. The cost of potable construction water shall be at a rate established by the City. Any use of potable water for construction shall be subject to availability as determined by the City.

During construction Engineering
Department

118. The Applicant shall provide for a system to inform all contractors and subcontractors and other affiliated parties conducting business within the City that a Business License must be obtained from the City. Prior to the preconstruction meeting, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Lincoln a list containing all parties doing business within the City as a result of the project.

The City will check the list to ensure that each party has obtained the necessary Business License.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits and
during construction
Building
119. The Applicant may place a temporary sales building on the project site during project construction, subject to approval of the Com
munity Development
Department. The Applicant shall submit information to the Community Development Department regarding the location and services available to the structure as well as elevations of the temporary facility. Use of the facility will be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department.

During construction Building

PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
70 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
120. For each phase of development, the Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan for all water quality features. The Maintenance and Operation Plan shall contain as a minimum a descriptio n of the constructed facilities, the design criteria, a description of the way the facility is expected to operate, a description of maintenance activities required along with a schedule for each activity. The Maintenance and Operation Plan shall also con
tain a description of sampling, testing, and reporting
requirements. The Maintenance and Operation Plan shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department.

The Applicant shall submit a post construction Storm Water Quality Plan with the project drainage study. The project shall comply with the City Ordinance, California MS4 permit requirements or any other State mandated requirements.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering
121. The Applicant shall submit a post construction Erosion Contr ol Plan for each phase of construction for City approval. The Plan shall include Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to minimize and control the level of pollutants in stormwater runoff released to off- site receiving waters. Specific techniques may be based upon geotechnical reports and shall comply with the adopted City standards.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering

122. The Applicant shall be responsible for repairing street damage caused by construction equipment on the street system to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering
Department

123. The Applicant, through his/her engineer or surveyor, shall set sufficient durable monuments to conform to the standards prescribed in Section 8771 of the Business and Professional Code of California.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering
Department

71 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
124. The Applicant shall be required to underground all existing public utilities fronting or within the project site, except that electric transmission lines of 60 KV and higher may be excluded in the Development Agreement.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering
Department

125. Subject to the Applicant’s 404 Permit, sewer and water easements located in open space areas shall have an access road to valves and manholes approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer, constructed with a minimum easement width of 15-feet and providing an 8-foot wide paved section, with 2’ wide aggregate base shoulders. (Any crossing of US Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional wetlands shall be in a steel casing.) Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering &
City Engineer

126. Prior to the acceptance of each phase of improvements, the Applicant shall provide the City with “As-Built Plans” in a mylar hard copy and PDF the another on a computer disc in an AutoCAD format compatible with the City’s mapping acceptable to the Public Services Department.

Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering
Department

127. Existing and proposed public facilities and improvements damaged during the course of construction shall be repaired by the Applicant, at his expense, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Prior to Notice of
Completion
Engineering
Department

128. When improvements to landscape corridors and trails are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Development Department, the improved property shall be conveyed by a grant deed to the City, or HOA as applicable, for on-going maintenance, operation, repair and replacement. The Applicant shall be responsible to pay the direct cost associated with the performance of this work until such time as the City begins collecting funds for this work or the cost of doing this work is incorporat
ed into a financing
mechanism to fund the costs of this work. (If dedication to City required.) Prior to the
Acceptance of
Improvements
Engineering,
Community
Development,
& Public
Services

72 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
129. The contractor shall be responsible for the televising of all sewer collection and transport facilities. A 72 -hour notification, both written and verbal, shall be given to the Community Development Department prior to the televising of the sewer system. If not properly notified the City may elect to require a retes ting of the subject system.

Prior to Notice of
Completion
Engineering
Department

PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
130. Finished exterior grades shall be sloped away from foundations to provide removal of surface water runoff away from structures. All building pads shall be provided with drainage away from foundations and to a properly controlled discharge system. No surface runoff should be allowed to flow from the pad over an unprotected slope. Terraced lots should avoid uncontrolled discharge of surface water runoff onto adjoining lots.

Prior to approval of
Plot Plans
Building &
Engineering

131. Fire hydrants or other acceptable alternative approved by the City, providing service for construction sites shall be operational prior to combustible vertical building construction beginning.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Building
132. Typical Landscape Plans, prepared by a registered landscape architect, shall be submitted for private front yard landscaping prior to issuance of Building Permits for homes. Such plan s shall utilize drought tolerant landscaping, irrigation systems and plant materials that comply with then applicable City of Lincoln standards for water standards.

Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Community
Development

73 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
133. All private exterior lighting is to be uniform or complimentary throughout the project. Private exterior lighting to be provided for all access driveways, parking areas and walkways so as to facilitate protection of private property and safe pedestrian movement within the project site. S
uch lighting shall be
accomplished in such a manner as not to illuminate adjacent properties or street which may be objectionable or hazardous. Detailed Construction Plans depicting the location and type of all lighting fixtures to be submitted and approved by the Building, Planning, and Police Department as part of the Construction Plans.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permit
Building,
Planning, &
Police
Department

134. The project shall be subject to the Western Placer Unified School District's Financing Plan.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Building
135. The Applicant shall pay all applicable fees at time of issuance of the Building Permit.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Building
136. The project shall be subject to the Placer County Capital Facilities Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of Building Permits
Building
137. The Applicant shall comply with Municipal Code section 17.32 regarding Park Dedication and Fees. The Applicant shall be required to dedicate park land, or pay an in-lieu fee at the Building Permit stage based upon the project’s per acre value of land established at the time the Tentative Subdivision Map’s approval becomes effective.

Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Building
138. Unless otherwise addressed in the Development Agreement, the development of any residential dwelling units shall be subject to the review and approval process of Design Review as set forth in the City’s Municipal Code.

Prior to the issuance
of the Building Permits
Planning

PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY
74 Exhibit A
Esplanade at Turkey Creek TSM project Conditions of Approval

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status
139. The Applicant shall install all fire protection measures required pursuant to the then applicable City Standards. All residential units shall be fire sprinkled in accordance with the 2010 California Fire Code, or the Fire Code in effect at the time of Building Permit application.

Prior to Final
Inspection/Occupancy
of each home
Building
140. All water meters shall be installed by the Public Services Department as per standards and specifications adopted by the City of Lincoln in June 2004 and as thereafter amended. A fee (applied city-wide) will be required for the cost and installation of each meter and may be adjusted annually based upon costs.

Prior to Final
Inspection/Occupancy
Building

♦ END ♦
75 EXHIBIT B
The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Esplanade at Turkey Creek project is approved subject to the attached exhibits:
76 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution to (1) Create CIP 722, Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure, and (2) Authorize a Budget Augmentation of $500,000 from the Unencumbered Balance of Fund 7310,
Solid Waste Capital. (Jacob Groeser)
SUBMITTED BY:

Jacob Groeser
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.E

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution that (1) creates CIP 722 – Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure, and (2) authorizes a budget augmentation of $500,000 from the unencumbered balance of Fund 7310 – Solid Waste Capital.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Beermann Plaza serves as a hub for local events and supports a vibrant, business- friendly environment. However, when the Plaza was originally designed, the long-term thought process of garbage collection and future regulatory requirements were not primary considerations. Today, waste is collected from more than 25 nearby businesses at this location.

For many years, this specific area relied on a 6-yard compactor with an additional 5-yard bin for overflow. Over time, operational issues with the compactor highlighted the need for a comprehensive review of trash and organics collection services in the Plaza.

With the implementation of new regulations, such as mandatory food waste separation, identifying adequate space for organics containers has been an ongoing concern for downtown businesses. Waste volumes have also increased alongside business growth, creating additional demand for service.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Staff proposes the construction of a new

trash and organics enclosure
within

the Plaza.

The proposed enclosure is designed to:

Accommodate several solid waste bins and multiple organics toters;

STAFF REPORT
77 Feature brick walls and surrounding shrubbery to complement the architecture of the former City Hall building (now the City Museum);
Occupy a section of the existing plaza footprint in an area determined to be least impactful to event operations and pedestrian access (see Attachment A).

Staff conducted multiple site visits and met with affected business owners to review the concept design (Attachment A), and gather input on operational considerations and aesthetics.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed project qualifies for a categorical/statutory exemption under section 15311 – Accessory Structures, and thereby is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The Plaza is already used to store waste collection bins, and the creation of this enclosure will not expand the existing use.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Requested Budget
With the creation of CIP 722, the fiscal year 2025-26 budget requires an augmentation in the amount of $500,000 from the unencumbered Fund balance of Fund 7310 - Solid Waste Capital. This fund has sufficient fund balance to accommodate this augmentation.

CIP 722 Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure
Fund 7310 $500,000
Fund Balances
Projected Fund balance FYE 2027 Updated Fund Balance Fund 7310 $3,235,159 $2,735,159

ATTACHMENTS:

REVISED -

3.Beerman_Plaza_Trash_Enclosure_CIP_722.DOC3.Resolution.2025November18.jgroeser.RFC.docx

2.Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure CIP 722.DOC2.Attachment A.2025November18.jgroeser.pdf
78 Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION THAT (1) CREATES CIP 722 – BEERMANN PLAZA TRASH ENCLOSURE, AND (2) AUTHORIZES A BUDGET AUGMENTATION OF $500,000 FROM UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCE OF FUND 7310 – SOLID WASTE CAPITAL.

WHEREAS, a portion of the Beerman Plaza is currently used to store waste from nearby businesses; and

WHEREAS, new legislation requiring the separation of food waste, as well as the increase in demand from nearby businesses , have prompted the City to create a dedicated waste enclosure; and

WHEREAS, staff have created a conceptual plan with input from impacted business owners; and

WHEREAS, the proposed enclosure would provide the space needed to properly manage the waste generated by nearby businesses and serve as an aesthetic addition to the plaza.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

The City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes:

1. The creation of CIP 722 – Beerman Plaza Trash Enclosure

2. A budget augmentation of $500,000 from unencumbered Fund 7310 – Solid Waste Capital to CIP 722 – Beerman Plaza Trash Enclosure.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

79 LOADING
ZONE

CONCEPTUAL DRAWING
C1.0
1 NO. REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVED BY DATE
SHEET NO.

OF

BEERMANN PLAZA TRASH ENCLOSURE
1 F:\ENGINEERING\CIP\CIP-XXX Beermann Plaza Trash Enclosure\9. Engineering and Design\9.01 - Preliminary Design (30%)\Beerman Plaza Trash Enclosure.dwg Lincoln
City of
DWG NO.

DRAFT - NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTION

DEPARTMENT OF

ENGINEERING
600 6TH STREET
LINCOLN, CA 95648
DRAWN BY:

DESIGNED BY:

REVIEWED BY:

JRG
XX
XX

DATE OF PLANS
11/18/2025
N
01"
5'

BEERMANN PLAZA TRASH ENCLOSURE - CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
BENCH

DECORATIVE SHRUB

DECORATIVE SHRUB
3 YD BIN

GREASE TRAP
35 GAL FOOD WASTE

LATCHED METAL GATE

METAL POST

CMU WALL WITH BRICK VENEER AND TILE CAP

REINFORCED CONCRETE PAVEMENT

STRIPES AND SIGNAGE TO DELINEATE LOADING AREA

46.0'38.0'

12.0'

11.0'

ATTACHMENT A
80 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manger to Execute the Public Facilities Element Fee Credit Agreement with Century Communities of California, LLC for
Transportation and Water
PFE Facilities associated with the Hidden Hills project. (Nita
Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:

Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT:

Community Development
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.F

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Public Facilities Element Fee Credit Agreement with Century Communities of California, LLC for Transportation and Water PFE Facilities associated with the Hidden Hills project with the approval and concurrence by City Attorney.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Hidden Hills project located south of McBean Park Drive and Oak Tree Lane (the “Project”) includes Public Facilities Element (“PFE”) facilities that will serve the Project and other areas of the City. As a condition of development for the Project, Century Communities of California, LLC (the “Developer”) is required to construct the PFE facilities identified in Exhibit A of the Draft PFE Fee Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) that is included as Attachment B to this report and will earn PFE fee credits accordingly. These PFE fee credits may be used to offset the Project’s PFE fee obligation pursuant to the City of Lincoln’s current PFE Nexus Study.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

City staff has coordinated with the Developer to prepare the initial PFE credit values for the PFE facilities included in the Agreement based on best available data at this time. A final “true- up” of actual costs will be performed following City acceptance of the PFE facilities pursuant to the Agreement to determine the final credit values. However, the final credit values awarded to the Developer upon the final true-up shall not exceed the cost estimate assumed for the facilities in the preparation of the PFE Nexus Study, including the annual inflationary adjustments applied as part of the PFE Fee Program.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Developer will be granted an initial PFE credit value of $2,028,297 for the Project, subject

STAFF REPORT
81 to final true-up in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. These earned PFE fee credits may be applied toward PFE fees for the Project that would otherwise be required to be paid at the time of building permit issuance, and may be transferred to another landowner or reimbursed to the Developer by the City at a future date subject to availability of PFE funds pursuant to the Agreement.

ATTACHMENTS:

REVISED_-_RESOLUTION_Hidden_Hills_Credit_Agreement.docx Hidden Hills PFE Credit Agreement_v2 (clean).docx
82 Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT FEE

CREDIT AGREEMENT WITH CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC FOR

TRANSPORTATION AND WATER PFE FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIDDEN HILLS

PROJECT

WHEREAS, Century Communities of California, LLC (the “Developer”) is developing the Hidden Hills project (the “Project”) that includes Public Facilities Element (“PFE”) Facilities that will serve the Project and other areas of the City; and

WHEREAS, the Developer is required as a condition of development of the Project to construct, or cause to be constructed, certain transportation and water PFE facilities; and

WHEREAS, the Project will be required to pay PFE fees as a part of the building permit process; and

WHEREAS, the Developer will receive PFE fee credits for construction of PFE facilities that may offset the Project’s PFE fee obligation that would otherwise be collected upon issuance of building permits; and

WHEREAS, the initial PFE credit value awarded to the Developer for the construction of the transportation and water PFE facilities is $2,028,297; and

WHEREAS, a final “true -up” of all actual costs associated with construction of the transportation and water PFE facilities will be performed following City acceptance of the PFE facilities to determine the final PFE credit value.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes the City Manager to execute a Public Facilities Element Fee Credit Agreement with Century Communities of California, LLC for Transportation and Water Faci lities associated with the Hidden Hills Project with approval and concurrence by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

_________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
ATTEST:

_________________________
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
83

CITY OF LINCOLN

PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT

FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT

HIDDEN HILLS PROJECT WITHIN
THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

CENTURY COMMUNITIES OF CALIFORNIA, LLC

TRANSPORTATION AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS

This Public Facilities Element (“PFE”) Fee Credit Agreement (the “Agreement") is entered into by and between the City of Lincoln (hereinafter the “City”) and Century Communities of California, LLC, a Delaware limited liability comp any, and/or its successors in interest, (hereinafter the “Constructing Owner") as of the I day of November, 2025 (the “Effective Date”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City previously created a comprehensive program to generate funding from new development to construct necessary backbone infrastructure and community services facilities (the “PFE Fee Program”) pursuant to Chapter 18.99 of the Municipal Code and California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. (“Mitigation Fee Act”); and
WHEREAS, on November 27, 2012, the City Council of City of Lincoln adopted the Village 1 Specific Plan. Certain projects within the Village 1 Specific Plan Area (the “Plan Area”) are required to construct PFE facilities and pro visions for these projects to earn PFE Fee Credits exist per the City ’s PFE Implementation Plan and Policies adopted on October 28, 2025 (the “PFE Policy”); and

WHEREAS, on September 26, 2023, the City Council of City of Lincoln adopted Resolution 2023-180, approving the Village 1 Specific Plan Amendment which included infrastructure realignment and land use changes; and

WHEREAS, Constructing Owner is developing the Hidden Hills project located south of McBean Park Drive and Oak Tree Lane within the Plan Area (the “Project”), including PFE facilities and improvements that will serve the Project and other areas of the City; and

WHEREAS, the overall list of PFE facilities and improvements are identified in the most recently adopted version of the nexus analysis, including the authorized annual adjustments, approved by the City Council to support the administration of the PFE Fee Program (hereafter the “PFE Nexus Study”); and

WHEREAS, Constructing Owner is required, as a condition of development o f the Project, or has otherwise agreed (with City’s approval), to construct or cause to be constructed the PFE facilities and improvements described in Exhibit A hereto, which are included within the improvement plan sets titled Improvement Plans for Oak Tree Lane, dated December 10, 2020 and approved on December 22, 2020, and McBean Park Drive Phases 2A, 2B & 2C, dated April 17, 2024 and approved on April 26, 2024 (hereinafter the “PFE Facilities"); and

84

WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 18.99.040 and the PFE Policy allow for credits and reimbursements to the Constructing Owner that constructs specified PFE facilities and improvements as defined in the PFE Fee Program and as established in the PFE Nexus Study; and

WHEREAS, City and Constructing Owner are the current parties to a Development Agreement dated September 12, 2017 (and, as may be amended, herein referred to as the “DA”), which contains provisions governing the terms for PFE Fee Credits pursuant to the PFE Policy , and which are not intended to be amended in any way by this Agreement; and

WHEREAS, administration of the City ’s PFE Fee Program will be the responsibility of the City Engineer or their designee (the “Administrator”); and

WHEREAS, City has agreed to allow Constructing Owner to execute a contract to design and construct the PFE Facilities; and

WHEREAS, Constructing Owner has entered into a contract with A. Teichert & Sons, Inc. for construction of the PFE Facilities (the “Construction Contract"); and

WHEREAS, the PFE Fee Program includes a Critical component and Non-Critical component as defined in the PFE Nexus Study; and

WHEREAS, City and Constructing Owner now desire to enter into an Agreement to provide for allowable credits and future reimbursements from the Transportation and Water PFE accounts, as defined and described in the PFE Policy and the DA, by the City to Constructing Owner for certain costs of design and construction of the PFE Facilities (the “PFE Fee Credits”), which PFE Fee Credits may, at Constructing Owner’s discretion, be applied as credits at building permit against the PFE Fees on the terms set forth in this Agreement, reimbursed from the amount available for reimbursements from the PFE Fee Program, or transfer red to a new owner with a written document approved in form and acknowledged by the City; and

WHEREAS, this Agreement will not apportion any PFE Fee Credits that Constructing Owner may elect to apply as PFE Fee Credits to any particular real property. Such apportionment shall be accomplished at Constructing Owner’s discretion to any portion or portions of the Constructing Owner’s Property as described herein.

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Constructing Owner agree as follows:

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS

All terms not otherwise described herein shall have the meaning(s) described thereto in the PFE Policy and DA.

SECTION 2. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT

This Agreement is not intended to modify or amend in any way the rights and obligations defined in the PFE Policy related to the construction of PFE projects and earned PFE Fee Credits. The purpose of the Agreement is to specify the PFE Facilities, the related earned PFE Fee Credits, and the options available to the Constructing Owner regarding application of earned PFE Fee Credits.

85

SECTION 3. CONSTRUCTION OF PFE FACILITIES

Constructing Owner shall complete construction of the PFE Facilities in acco rdance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer, and in accordance with City improvement standards and this Agreement. Constructing Owner understands and acknowledges that the terms and conditions contained in any contract that Constructing Owner has or may execute with any contractors or material suppliers regarding the construction of the PFE Facilities shall have no force or effect upon this Agreement. Constructing Owner is solely responsible for all contract payment obligations and may not rely upon reimbursement from the City PFE accounts for the purpose of payment to contractors.

SECTION 4. BONDS

A. Constructing Owner has posted the following securities for the PFE Facilities in favor of the City in the amounts and forms acceptable to the City Attorney:

1. To secure faithful performance in the construction of the PFE Facilities, security in an amount not less than one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated cost of the work in the Engineer’s Preliminary Estimate (see Exhibit A) and as approved by the City Engineer as being a reasonable estimate of the fair market cost of the work, including but not limited to cost of the PFE Facilities, engineering, inspection, fees, and incidental expenses, as determined by the City Engineer.

2. To secure payment to the contractor, subcontractors, and to persons furnishing labor, materials, or equipment to them, security in an amount not less than one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated cost of the work in the Engineer’s Preliminary Estimate (see Exhibit A) and as approved by the City Engineer as being a reasonable estimate of the fair market cost of the work, including but not limited to cost of the PFE Facilities, engineering, inspection, fee, and incidental expenses, as determined by the City Engineer.

3. If applicable, to secure payment of the cost of setting of monuments, security in an amount equal to one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated costs of setting such monuments as determined by the City Engineer.

B. To secure the guarantee and warranty of the work for a period of one (1) year following the completion and acceptance of the PFE Facilities, security in an amount not less than fifteen (15%) percent of the actual cost of the work perfo rmed, including but not limited to the cost of the PFE Facilities, engineering, inspection, fees, and incidental expenses, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be filed with the City prior to the final acceptance of the PFE Facilities by the City.

C. If security is furnished in the form of a bond or bonds, such bonds shall be executed by a corporate surety company authorized to transact surety business in the State of California.

D. If Constructing Owner shall fail or neglect to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means and thereupon recover from the Constructing Owner and/or his/her surety the full cost and expense incurred.

SECTION 5. EARNED PFE FEE CREDITS

City and Constructing Owner agree that the amount of PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner hereunder shall be as set forth on Exhibit B hereto and made a part hereof, which 86

shall indicate if the PFE Facilities are subject to a final “true up" as described in Section 10 of this Agreement. A “true up" would include the reconciliation of actual costs, for both “hard costs" and “soft costs", through the documents as required in Section 10.

“Hard Costs” could include the costs of (i) construction of the PFE Facilities, based on the price included in the Construction Contract and actually paid to the contractor for the construction of the PFE Facilities, (ii) traffic control, staging, and storm water pollution prevention implementation measures (i.e., structural BMPs) related to such construction, and (iii) habitat mitigation required as a mitigation measure in connection with the construction of such PFE Facilities. Hard Costs shall include the costs of any changes in scope or standards required by the City during the course of construction thereof that are added to the Construction Contract. “Eligible Hard Costs” means all of the Hard Costs incurred by the Constructing Owner to construct the PFE Facilities and approved by the City Engin eer based on best available cost data and supporting documentation submitted by the Developer. In no event shall the PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid for Eligible Hard Costs. Constructing Owner shall provide documentation as required by the Administrator, which may include but is not limited to proof of payment and lien releases from all contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers for all costs for which it seeks credit or reimbursement under this Agreement.

“Soft Costs" could include the co sts of planning, design , and financing of the PFE Facilities, storm water pollution prevention monitoring & management (i.e., non-structural BMPs), engineering, inspection, geotechnical oversight and monitoring, testing, surveying, outside agency review fees, and bonding related to the construction of the PFE Facilities. “Eligible Soft Costs" means all of the Soft Costs incurred by the Constructing Owner to construct the PFE Facilities and approved by the City Engineer based on best available cost data and supporting documentation submitted by the Developer. In no event shall the PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid for Eligible Soft Costs. Constructing Owner shall provide documentation as required by the Administrator, which may include but is n ot limited to proof of payment and lien releases from all contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers for all costs for which it seeks credit or reimbursement under this Agreement.

PFE Fee Credits related to the construction of PFE Facilities subject to a final “true up" shall be equal to the Eligible Hard Costs and Eligible Soft Costs (collectively, the “Total Eligible Costs") and shall be initially set forth on Exhibit B upon execution of this Agreement.

In the event of any disagreement between the Constructing Owner and the Administrator on the initial calculation of the Total Eligible Costs, if all other conditions to the entry of this Agreement have been satisfied, the Constructing Owner may elect to enter into this Agreement without having the amount of the Total Eligible Costs resolved and listed on Exhibit B. In such case, Constructing Owner’s right hereunder to apply any portion of the Total Eligible Costs (or the disputed amount thereof) will be deferred until such disagreement is resolved by the Constructing Owner and the City. If the Constructing Owner and the Administrator are unable to resolve any disputed amounts after the parties have engaged in good faith meetings and exchange of documents in support of their positions, the appeal provisions in Section 31 of this Agreement shall apply. The parties shall use their best efforts to resolve any such dispute within sixty (60) days of the cost document submission by the Constructing Owner.

Pending the resolution of any such dispute, the Constructing Owner shall pay any and all required PFE Fees and City shall retain any PFE Fees paid by the Constructing Owner after the Effective Date of this Agreement for potential refund upon resolution of such Total Eligible Cost dispute.

The amount of PFE Fee Credits retained pending resolution of any Total Eligible Cost dispute shall not exceed the disputed amount. Upon resolution of any Total Eligible Cost dispute, and within twenty (20) business days of resolution of the Total Eligible Cost dispute, the Administrator shall amend Exhibit B to provide the final amount of the PFE Fee Credits allowed hereu nder. Constructing Owner shall then 87

have thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the amended Exhibit B to retroactively apply any portion of such PFE Fee Credit to the Project and obtain an equivalent refund of PFE Fees collected and retained from the Constructing Owner after the Effective Date of this Agreement pending the resolution of the Total Eligible Cost dispute. If Constructing Owner does not elect within such time to have any of the PFE Fee Credits applied to the Project, then any PFE Fees previously collected and retained from the Constructing Owner during such period shall remain eligible for future credit or reimbursement.

SECTION 6. PFE FEE CREDITS - APPLICATION, REIMBURSEMENT, OR TRANSFER

PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner; (1) may be applied towards PFE Fees related to the Project in accordance with the PFE Policy , or (2) may be requested for reimbursement from the applicable PFE account in accordance with the PFE Policy, or (3) may be transferred to another landowner within the Plan Area.

Pursuant to the DA, PFE Fee Credits earned by Constructing Owner may be applied against the Non-Critical Component of the transportation, wastewater, water, or drainage PFE Fees, or requested for reimbursement from any of the transportation, wastewater, water, or drainage PFE accounts.

SECTION 7. PRIORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR PFE FEE CREDITS

If the updated credit value determined by the “true-up” process described in Section 10 and the PFE Policy (the “Final Credit Value”) exceeds the PFE Fee obligation for the Project, the Constructing Owner may request reimbursement from the PFE Fee account corresponding to the PFE Fee Category in which the applicable credits were earned, subject to availability of funds as determined by the City.

Reimbursements shall be made on a “first -in, first-out” basis, with highest priority given to the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest City acceptance date and with an approved PFE Credit Agreement. The Constructing Owner may also request to transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to another landowner within the Plan Area subject to approval from the City Manager, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld . To transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to a nother landowner within the Plan Area, the Constructing Owner must coordinate with the City to complete, approve, and execute the Certification and Assignment of Fee Credits included hereto as Exhibit C.

Requested reimbursements for excess PFE Fee Credits shall be paid out first for the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest priorities as described above , until paid in full (i.e., the constructing owner of a PFE facility or improvement with an earlier priority shall receive all available funds in the applicable PFE account until paid in full prior to any reimbursements being paid for a PFE facility or improvement with a later priority. If two or more constructing owners have the same priority (“Equal-Priority Constructing Owners”), after payment in full on any reimbursement for an earlier priority, the reimbursements to such Equal-Priority Constructing Owners shall be paid out pro rata based on the relative amount of the requested reimbursements due thereunder at the time of such payment. For example, if at the time of payment of any reimbursement hereunder, another constructing owner has requested reimbursements for a PFE facility or improvement with the same priority as the PFE Facilities under this Agreement, then such payment would be divided between the Constructing Owner and the other constructing owner in proportion to the relative amounts of the reimbursements then requested under the respective agreements.

In accordance with the applicable established priorities, the reimbursement hereunder shall be paid to Constructing Owner when the PFE Facilities are completed as determined by the City Engineer (“Completion”) and accepted by the City in writing, or such earlier date after Completion that the City Engineer deems appropriate. The reimbursement shall be paid by the City as fee revenu es from the 88

applicable PFE account are collected. After Completion of the PFE Facilities, such payments shall be made by the City at least quarterly throughout the year as funds become available.

The obligation arising from this Agreement is not a debt of the City, nor a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien, or encumbrance, upon any of its property, or upon any of its income, receipts, or revenues, and is payable only and solely from the applicable PFE account.

SECTION 8. TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS

PFE Fee Credits are personal to the Constructing Owner and do not run with the Project that is generating such credits. Provided the Constructing Owner has no outstanding monetary obligation to the City within the Project, Constructing Owner may, at its sole option and discretion, assign the rights to the PFE Fee Credits , including the right to request reimbursements against the applicable PFE account, to any other landowner within the Plan Area, subject to the conditions and limitations herein regarding the application of such PFE Fee Credits.

If Constructing Owner has an outstanding monetary obligation to the City as noted above, then the City may require monetary obligation to be met before transfer of the PFE Fee Credit s owned by Constructing Owner. Any assignment of the rights to PFE Fee Credits shall be made in writing and delivered to the Administrator in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Assigned PFE Fee Credits carry the same priority the assignor had in the PFE Fee Credits.

SECTION 9. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO PFE FEE CREDITS OR REIMBURSEMENTS;

The PFE Fee Credits shall be adjusted on an annual basis and the estimated cost of the PFE Facilities shall be adjusted annually pursuant to the PFE Policy. The adjusted amount shall be used to determine the Total Eligible Costs for any credits or reimbursements applied or received until the next annual adjustment.

SECTION 10. "TRUE UP" OF PFE FEE CREDITS

Upon completion of the PFE Facilities by the Constructing Owner and acceptance thereof by the City, the final determination of actual Eligible Hard Costs upon which the PFE Fee Credits amount is based shall be determined by the City Engineer based on documentation thereof provided by Constructing Owner to the City Engineer’s reasonable satisfaction. For construction change orders to be given consideration for reimbursement, the Constructing Owner must:

 Present the change order request and estimated cost along with supporting information to the City Engineer; and

 Fully document any work performed under a change order to verify all associated costs.

Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the ineligibility of the requested change order for such PFE Fee Credits.

To secure final PFE Fee Credits, Constructing Owner shall provide the following items to the City Engineer in order for each to determine the actual Eligible Hard Costs and Eligible Soft Costs incurred by Constructing Owner for the PFE Facilities that qualify for PFE Fee Credits:

89

(1) Copies of the original Construction Contract and any change orders that have been agreed to by the Constructing Owner , contractor, and the City. The portion of each change order associated with the PFE Facilities must be itemized separately; (2) Copies of all invoices, with unconditional lien releases, submitted by the contractor and suppliers;
(3) Copies of all checks issued by the Constructing Owner with related invoices indicated;

(4) A summary tabulation of all contractor and supplier invoices and Constructing Owner payments; and

(5) Prevailing Wage Certification, or documentation acceptable to the City Attorney of an exception to the applicability of prevailing wage.

If, when the final reconciliation of Total Eligible Costs for the PFE Facilities is conducted by the Administrator, the actual Total Eligible Costs for the PFE Facilities exceeds the amount of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the Administrator shall re view items (1) through (4) above and determine if the actual Total Eligible Costs will serve as the basis for determination of the amount of the PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner should be increased above the amount described in Exhibit B of this Agreement. The City Engineer shall determine how much of the actual construction costs should be included in any increase to the Total Eligible Costs and Exhibit B shall be adjusted accordingly. However, in no event shall the Final Credit Value awarded to the Constructing Owner upon final reconciliation exceed the cost estimate assumed for the PFE Facilities in the preparation of the PFE Nexus Study, including the annual inflationary adjustments applied as part of the PFE Fee Program.

If the final reconciliation determines that Total Eligible Costs are less than the amount of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the Administrator shall notify the Constructing Owner of such reduction of the PFE Fee Credits and Exhibit B shall be revised accordingly. If the amount of PFE Fee Credits applied towards PFE Fees exceeds the final amount of Total Eligible Costs that supported such PFE Fee Credits, then the Constructing Owner shall pay the amount of the PFE Fee Credits that were applied in excess of the confirmed Total Eligible Costs within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of notice from the Administrator of the amount to be paid.

In no event shall PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid by the Constructing Owner for Total Eligible Costs. Any determination by the City Engineer under this Section shall be subject to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement.

SECTION 11. FAILURE TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION

Failure to complete work within the scope of this Agreement may affect the priority status for the credit or reimbursement granted hereunder, may result in termination of the PFE Fee Credits and termination of the right to apply PFE Fee Credits, and may re quire payment of any PFE Fee Credits applied, as deemed appropriate by the Administrator. In connection therewith, the Administrator may determine that the Constructing Owner shall not be entitled to further PFE Fee Credits until City acceptance of the PFE Facilities as determined by the City Engineer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. A change in the priority for any reimbursement will be evaluated from the previously determined priority to the date of acceptance, which may affect priority for the reimbursement. Any determination by the Administrator to invoke the provisions of this Section shall be subject to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement.

90

SECTION 12. INSPECTION

City and its authorized representatives shall, at all times, have access to the construction site during construction of the PFE Facilities and Constructing Owner shall furnish City with all reasonable information necessary for ascertaining full knowledge of the PFE Facilities with respect to the progress, workmanship, and character of materials and equipment used and employed in the work.

Whenever the contractors retained by Constructing Owner vary from the normal period during which work or any portion of it is carried out on each day, Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer so that if he or she wishes, be present to observe the work in progress. If Constructing Owner fails to give such timely notice, any work done in the absence of a City representative will be subject to rejec tion. Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer in advance of backfilling or otherwise covering any part of the work so that the City ’s representative may, if he or she wishes, observe the work before it is concealed.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, all PFE Facilities shall be subject to City inspection for compliance with City requirements prior to issuance of a Letter of A cceptance from the City Engineer. Observation of the work or inspection by the City shall not relieve the Constructing Owner or its sureties of full responsibility for defective materials or workmanship or any of its obligations to complete construction in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer.

SECTION 13. COMPLIANCE WITH PREVAILING WAGE LAWS

Unless otherwise authorized by City Charter, City ordinance, or applicable State statutory or common law, pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II of the Labor Code of the State of California (Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws")), all work shall be performed in compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rat e of per diem wages for holidays and overtime work, for each craft, classification , or type of worker needed to execute the work contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers, and mechanics employed in the execution of said work by the Constructing Owner or the Constructing Owner’s contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said work. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations shall be filed by the Constructing Owner with, and made available for inspection at, the office of the City Clerk.

Constructing Owner shall require all contractors to register with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5. Constructing Owner shall require its contractor to post, at each jobsite, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations. No PFE Fee Credits shall be permissible without full compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

SECTION 14. INSURANCE

Constructing Owner shall require its contractor to carry and maintain for three (3) years after City Acceptance of the PFE Facilities, such public liability, property damage and contractual liability, auto, Workers’ Compensation, Builders’ Risk Insurance and other insurance coverage as required by the City in accordance with the improvement plan specifications for the PFE Facilities. The contractor shall name the City as an additional insured. For any claims related to the PFE Facilities, the contractor’s general liability and automobile insurance coverage shall be primary insurance in their coverage of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers, and any insurance or self -insurance 91

maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents , or volunteers shall be excess of the contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

SECTION 15. ACCEPTANCE AND CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES

Once Constructing Owner has completed construction of the PFE Facilities and the PFE Facilities are deemed satisfactory by the City Engineer following City inspection, the City Engineer may recommend that City Council accept the PFE Facilities, including all associated easements and offers of dedication, provided that all liens, claims , and encumbrances in connection with the PFE Facilities have been released and the required warranty bond has been provided to the City. No acceptance shall be valid without the Constructing Owner conveying and vesting full, complete, and clear title in said PFE Facilities to the City at the time of acceptance.

SECTION 16. LIENS, CLAIMS, AND ENCUMBRANCES

Prior to the City’s acceptance of any PFE Facilities, Constructing Owner shall clear any and all liens, claims, and encumbrances from said PFE Facilities as a condition of acceptance by the City.

SECTION 17. DELIVERY OF AS-BUILT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Prior to acceptance of the PFE Facilities by City, Constructing Owner shall deliver to City copies of all as-built plans (if any), specifications, operating manuals, service manuals, warranties , and other documents relating to the design, construction, and operation of the PFE Facilities described in this Agreement. Upon acceptance of the PFE Facilities, City shall file Notice of Completion with Placer County.

SECTION 18. INDEMNIFICATION

The Constructing Owner, by execution of this Agreement, specifically agrees to protect and assume the defense of, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its elected representatives, officers, employees, agents , and consultants (the "Indemnitees"), from and against all liabilities, actions, lawsuits, damages, claims, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including attorneys’ and consultants’ fees and expenses, (collectively, “Liabilities"), to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of or resulting from the design, construction, or installation of the PFE Facilities, except to the extent the Liabilities arise from the sole negligence, or willful miscon duct of the City and/or the Indemnitees. This indemnification shall extend to Liabilities occurring after this Agreement is terminated as well as while it is in force. Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the acceptance of the improvements by the City, or if there is an applicable warranty, following the end of any applicable warranty period, the Constructing Owner shall not be obligated to indemnify the Indemnitees for Liabilities to the extent that such Liabilities arise from Indemnitees ’ active or pa ssive negligence following acceptance of the PFE Facilities.

SECTION 19. THIRD PARTY LIABILITY

City does not assume any liability, duty , or obligation to Constructing Owner ’s contractors, subcontractors, agents , or any person or entity not a party to this Agreement by execution or performance of this Agreement, and no contractors, subcontractors, agents , or any parties are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement.

92

SECTION 20. WARRANTY

Constructing Ow ner hereby warrants the PFE Facilities as to materials, design , and workmanship and should any defect or failure of the PFE Facilities, or any parts thereof, occur within a period of one (1) year after final acceptance by City, Constructing Owner shall promptly cause the needed repairs to be made without any expense or cost to the City. Final acceptance shall be deemed to have occurred under this Agreement when the PFE Facilities have been accepted by the City pursuant to a written acceptance from the City Engineer and is placed into actual service. City shall provide written notification to Constructing Owner of final acceptance by the City.

City is hereby authorized to make repairs if Constructing Owner fails to make, or undertake with due diligence, the aforesaid repairs within twenty (20) calendar days after it is given written notice of such defect or failure. In case of emergency, where in the opinion of the City Engineer delay may cause serious hazard to the public, the necessary repairs may be made by the City without prior notice to Constructing Owner. All costs of the repair, if not paid by the Constructing Owner within twenty (20) calendar days of notice from the Administrator to the Constructing Owner, shall be paid out of the Warranty Bond. In no event shall the City be responsible for the cost of the repair within the warranty period. In all cases of defect or failure within the warranty period where the City has taken action in accordance with this paragraph, Constructing Owner shall promptly reimburse City and, if applicable, the Warranty Bond shall fund the repair for any and all costs or expenses, direct or indirect, incurred by the City. The foregoing is in addition to, and shall not in any way limit or affect, the rights of the City to enforce the warranty obligations of Constructing Owner hereunder and to recover any and all costs thereof from the warranty bond posted thereby.

SECTION 21. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS

Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto, in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein.

SECTION 22. ATTORNEY’S FEES

If any suit, action or proceeding in law or equity (except for the dispute resolution process set forth herein) is brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees.

SECTION 23. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT

Constructing Owner and City certify that they have the authority and ar e legally empowered to enter into this Agreement on behalf of their entity and to bind their party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

SECTION 24. NOTICES

Any notices, requests, demands , or other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally (FedEx and similar services, each of which is hereinafter called an “Express Courier,” shall be considered to be personal service) or by telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission (provided that the sender of a telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission has received confirmation of successful transmission by the sending fax machine), and upon receipt, if 93

mailed to the p arty to whom notice is to be given, by first -class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and properly addressed as follows:

(a) If to City:

City of Lincoln
Attn: City Engineer
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________

With a copy to:

City of Lincoln
Attn: City Attorney
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________

(b) If to Constructing Owner:

Century Communities
Attn: Dean Mills
6700 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 210
Pleasanton, CA 94566
Tel: 925-234-9018

Either party may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such changes to the other party in the manner provided herein.

SECTION 25. NOTICE OF CONTRACTORS

Constructing Owner shall provide a copy of this Agreement to any contractors, subcontractors, or other parties performing work on the PFE Facilities, prior to commencement of construction by said party.

SECTION 26. TERM

The term of this Agreement shall start on the day and year duly executed by all parties and shall remain in effect until all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement have been satisfied.

SECTION 27. SEVERABILITY

If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

94

SECTION 28. CONFLICTS

This agreement is intended to implement and be consistent with the requirements of the PFE Policy. Therefore, in the event of any conflicts between the PFE Policy and this Agreement, the requirements of the PFE Policy shall prevail and control.

SECTION 29. EXHIBITS

The Exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. The Agreement may be amended only by writing executed by both parties.

SECTION 31. RIGHT OF APPEAL

The Constructing Owner may appeal any final determination by the Administrator to the City Manager and thereafter to the City Council. Prior to submitting the matter to the City Council, the City Manager may, in his/her discretion, elect to engage the services of a mediator to attempt to mediate the dispute in a non-binding fashion, not to exceed a total of thirty (30) calendar days. Any decision of the City Council shall be final with no right of further appeal or action thereafter.

SECTION 32. EFFECTIVE DATE

The City ’s execution of this Agreement shall be contingent upon confirmation by the City Engineer that (i) a Construction Contract has been properly bid and entered into for construction of the PFE Facilities, (ii) performance and payment bonds have been posted in form and amount required by the City, and (iii) a Notice to Proceed has been given to the contractor for the PFE Facilities. The date of such execution by the City, based in part on the City’s confirmation of the satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, shall be deemed to be the “Effective Date" of this Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement by the City, the City shall insert the Effective Date in the Preamble to this Agreement and provide a copy of this fully executed and dated Agreement to the Constructing Owner.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

95

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above-written.

CITY: THE CONSTRUCTING OWNER:

CITY OF LINCOLN, Century Communities of California, LLC, a municipal corporation a Delaware limited liability company

By:

By: Name:

Its: City Manager Title:

ATTEST:

By:

Its: City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

By:

Its: City Engineer

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

By:

Its: Finance Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Its: City Attorney
96 Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

PFE FACILITIES
ENGINEER’S PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE

PFE
Item
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
R-254 Oak Tree Lane frontage of existing development - west side (1 Lane -1,800 LF) $284,142 R-38B McBean Park Drive/Oak Tree Lane intersection $1,169,004 W-31D Oak Tree Lane from connection at 24" pipeline to McBean Park Drive (Oversizing to 18" - 2,600 LF) $45,511 W-13G Connection to 24" pipeline at Oak Tree Lane (30" - 200 LF) $92,526 W-13E Oak Tree Lane from Refinery Point Tank to connection at 24" pipeline (Oversizing to 30" - 6,800 LF) $812,593 W-13F Connection to 24" pipeline at Oak Tree Lane (30" - 200 LF) $92,526 $2,496,302
1 Based on the amounts estimated in the PFE Nexus Study for each PFE Item, prorated by the percentage of the PFE Facility constructed or caused to be constructed by the Constructing Owner.

Total:
97 Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B

IDENTIFICATION OF PFE FEE CREDITS

HIDDEN HILLS PROJECT WITHIN
THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

Century Communities of California, LLC

Transportation and Water PFE Facilities

Date of Agreement: __________, 2025

PFE
Item
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
Initial PFE
Credit Value2
Reconciled "True Up"
PFE Credit Value3
R-254 Oak Tree Lane, frontage of existing development west side (1 Lane -1,800 LF) $284,142 $284,142 $_______________ R-38B McBean Park Drive/Oak Tree Lane intersection $1,169,004 $857,431 $_______________ W-31D4 Oak Tree Lane, from connection to 24" pipeline to McBean Park Drive (Oversizing to 18" - 2,600 LF) $45,511 $45,511 $_______________ W-13G Connection to 24" pipeline at Oak Tree Lane (30" - 200 LF) $92,526 $9,720 $_______________ W-13E Oak Tree Lane, from Refinery Point Tank to connection to 24" pipeline (Oversizing to 30" - 6,800 LF) $812,593 $812,593 $_______________ W-13F Connection to 24" pipeline at Oak Tree Lane (30" - 200 LF) $92,526 $18,900 $_______________ $2,496,302 $2,028,297 $_______________
Transportation PFE Fee Credits: $1,141,573 $_______________ Water PFE Fee Credits: $886,724 $_______________
Total PFE Credit Values: $2,028,297 $_______________
1 The PFE Estimate of Cost includes 50% of construction costs for soft costs. However, for PFE Item R-38B, the allowable amount for soft costs is 7.5% of the construction cost per the cost sharing agreement between the Constructing Owner and Taylor Morrison. 2 The Initial PFE Credit Value is calculated as the lesser of the PFE Estimate of Cost and the best available actual cost data as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. 3 To be determined following City acceptance of the PFE Facilities for the Project, pursuant to Section 10 of this Agreement. 4 For PFE Item R-38B, the cost sharing agreement between Taylor Morrison and Constructing Owner states Constructing Owner will reimburse Taylor Morrison for 50% of construction costs, plus an additional 7.5% for soft costs. Therefore, Constructing Owner is eligible for 57.5% of hard construction costs corresponding to PFE Item R-38B.

Totals:
98 Exhibit C

EXHIBIT C

FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT AND

TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS

Hidden Hills, Village 1 Specific Plan Area, Transfer Letter #___

Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits

The undersigned Constructing Owner, as the holder of certain PFE Fee Credits related to the PFE Fee Credit Agreement between the Constructing Owner and the City of Lincoln, dated November ____, 2025 (the “Agreement”), hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys to the undersigned Assignee the PFE Fee Credits as indicated in the table below. Assignee acknowledges that the following PFE Fee Credits do not represent all fees payable by Assignee, which may change based upon the size of Assignee’s project and other factors. Constructing Owner and the City wish to certify the availability of the PFE Fee Credits and hereby consent to the assignment of the below PFE Fee Credits to Assignee.

1. The City hereby acknowledges and certifies that Constructing Owner is the curren t holder of the following PFE Fee Credits pursuant to the Agreement.

2. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Constructing Owner does hereby assign and transfer to Assignee; and Assignee does hereby accept from Constructing Owner the assignment and transfer of the PFE Fee Credits as shown in the table below. By signing below the City does hereby consent and agree to the above assignment.

Prior to receiving credit against otherwise due and payable PFE Fees, exclu ding the payment of the Critical Component and Administration Fees, Assignee should submit this fully executed form to the City for its records.

PFE Fee
Category
PFE Fee
Credit Value
Transportation $
Water $

(Signatures are on the following page.)

99 Exhibit C
Hidden Hills, Village 1 Specific Plan Area, Transfer Letter #__

Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits

Constructing Owner: Assignee:

Century Communities of California, LLC, _______________________________,

a Delaware limited liability company a ______________________________

By:_______________________________ By:_____________________________

Name:_____________________________ Name: __________________________

Title:______________________________ Title:____________________________

City of Lincoln:

By: ______________________________ Date: __________________

__________________, City Manager

Approved as to form

____________________________

________________, City Attorney

100
SUBJECT:

Urban Water Management Plan Update 2025. (Chris Nelson) SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Nelson
DEPARTMENT:

Public Works
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 14.G

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Task Order through the On-Call Contract with West Yost for professional services associated with preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Update for a total amount not to exceed $112,512.

The Urban Water Management Plan is budgeted by the Public Works operating division in the amount of $130,000 for fiscal year 2025/26 from Fund 7100.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires every urban water supplier in California that either provides over 3,000 acre-feet of water annually, or serves more than 3,000 urban connections, to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) that includes specified content, including an urban water shortage contingency analysis, for submission to the Department of Water Resources. Urban water suppliers are required to submit a UWMP every five years. The 2025 UWMP is due on July 1, 2026.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Engineering staff released the request for proposals (RFP) to consultants on the Engineering On-Call list on September 24, 2025. One proposal was received by the due date of 3:00 p.m. on October 23, 2025 from West Yost & Associates, Inc. (West Yost).

The proposal was reviewed by a three-person panel comprised of Public Works Director, Environmental Services Manager and the Engineering Manager. The section criterion outlined

STAFF REPORT
101
in the RFP consisted of the following:

Project Understanding & Approach (50 pts)
Experience of firm(s) and specific staff (20 pts)
References from former clients (20 pts)
Completeness and compliance with RFP format (10 pts)

West Yost was found to be a qualified consultant based on their experience and understanding of the draft 2025 Urban Water Management Guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Budgeted
Urban Water Management Plan Update
Fund 7100 $130,000

Actual project costs
Fund 7100
Professional Services – West Yost $112,512

Budgeted Remaining
Fund 7100 $17,488

ATTACHMENTS:

REVISED - UWMP_2025_Consultant_Task_Order.DOC1.Reso.20251118.jespartero.docx Attachment A, Task Order - West Yost UWMP 2025 Update.pdf UWMP_2025_Consultant_Task Order.DOC3.Attachment B_RFP.20251118.jespartero.pdf UWMP_2025_Consultant_Task Order.DOC4.Attachment
C_West_Yost_Proposal.20251118.jespartero.pdf
102
Resolution No. 2025-

RESOLUTION 2025-

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TASK

ORDER THROUGH THE ON-CALL CONTRACT WITH WEST YOST & ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH PREPARATION OF THE 2025

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $112,512.

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln as a water purveyor is required by the State to adopt prior to July 1, 2026 a 2025 Urban Water Management Plan update; and

WHEREAS, proposals were requested from consultants from the City’s on-call list on September 24, 2025; and

WHEREAS, one proposal was received prior to 3:00 p.m. on October 23, 2025; and

WHEREAS, staff reviewed the proposal submitted by West Yost & Associates and found that they are a qualified consultant based on their experience and understanding of the draft 2025 Urban Water Management Guidelines.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , that the City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes the City Manager to execute a Task Order through the On -Call Contract with West Yost & Associates for professional services associated with preparation of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Update for a total amount not to exceed $112,512.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

103
Engineering Department
On-Call Contract for Professional Services
Consultant: West Yost
Project Name: 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Task Order

Date Requested: November 12, 2025
Contract#: ___________

This Task Order, authorized through the On-Call Contract by and between the City of Lincoln (“CITY”), and West Yost. (“CONSULTANT”), was approved on June 28, 2022, per Resolution No. 2022-158. This Task Order is being requested for the following services (see attachment for the full detailed scope of work).

1. 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) project. This task order will provide funding to support the required project management, data collection, water supply and demand analysis to prepare and deliver the final 2025 UWMP.

Consultant shall perform services on the project described above. This Task Order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this Task Order shall supplement the Contract as it pertains to the project described above.

Paragraph 15 of the contract shall be revised as follows by adding the following sentence:

Without limiting the foregoing, this obligation to indemnify and defend the City shall also specifically extend to any fees or penalties incurred by the City due to Consultant’s failure to submit the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) by the deadline of July 1, 2026. Consultant is obligated to meet the July 1, 2026 only if following conditions apply:
- Guidance information is made available by the California Department of Water Resources and City provides requested data in a time frame that allows reasonable time to produce the UWMP, and
- The City returns City comments on the UWMP back to Consultant in the time frame that has been agreed to between City and Consultant.

Project Budget –

Project Budget: $ 112,512.00

Account Code(s): 71008010-50400

The work described above and herein attached as the Scope of Work is hereby authorized by the following agency representatives.

Approved by: Approved by:

City of Lincoln West Yost

Signature: ________________________ Signature: _________________________ Name: Chris Nelson_________________ Name: ____________________________ Title: Project Manager _________ Title: _____________________________ Date: _____________________ Date: _____________________

Signature: ________________________
Name: Matthew Medill _______________
Title: Public Works Director ___________
Date: _____________________

104
Signature: ________________________
Name: Sean Scully_______________
Title: City Manager___________
Date: _____________________

This Task Order Amendment is executed this ____ day of _________________, 2025. 105
1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

TO PROVIDE

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE
CITY OF LINCOLN 2025 URBAN WATER

MANAGEMENT PLAN

FOR THE

CITY OF LINCOLN

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

Release Date: September 24, 2025
Questions Due: October 13, 2025
Submittal Deadline: 3:00 P.M. October 23, 2025
106
2 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE:

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE

CITY OF LINCOLN
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The City of Lincoln, California, invites qualified consulting firms to submit proposals for professional services to prepare the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) in accordance with the California Urban Water Management Planning Act (California Water Code, Division 6, Part 2.6, Sections 10610–10657) and all applicable requirements of the California State Water Board. The selected consultant will provide technical expertise, data analysis, stakeholder coordination, and documentation to produce a comprehensive UWMP that meets state mandates and supports the City’s water resource planning goals.

As required by the Urban Water Management Planning Act (the Act), UWMPs must be updated every five years with the submittal deadline for the 2025 UWMP as July 1, 2026.

The 202 5 UWMP will need to address any recent amendments to the Urban Water Management Planning Act and requirements outlined in yet -to-be-released Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) 2025 UWMP Guidebook. The Consultant sh all submit the adopted UWMP electronically using the reporting system established by the DWR and shall meet the submittal deadline.

Also, an UWMP must be consistent with various studies and plans, including; the Water Master Plan, Groundwater Management Plans, City growth projections, and any additional related water and planning studies. A copy of the City’s 2020 UWMP is attached (Attachment A).

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES: A UWMP that presents an accurate assessment of the City’s water supplies and demands, is consistent with the City’s other key water planning documents, and meets DWR’s 2025 UWMP requirements and schedule.

The Scope of Services is comprised of the following tasks:

Task 1 – Kick‐Off Meeting
The consultant shall attend a project kick ‐off meeting with City staff to discuss project parameters, scheduling constraints, and other relevant information regarding services required by this RF P to create the 202 5 UWMP. An overall project schedule shall be reviewed, revised and updated by the consultant.

The consultant shall prepare a detailed schedule of the project for a completion date.

It shall be the responsibility of the consultant to review and become familiar with all pertinent data for completion of the UWMP for adoption no later than the June 9, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting and submittal to DWR by the July 1, 2026 deadline.
107
3 Task 2 – Data Analysis and Evaluation
The consultant will provide data review and analysis, development of demand projections and analysis of demand management measures. Consultant shall develop the UWMP according to the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Guidebook for Water Suppliers and shall meet the July 1, 2026 submittal deadline.

The Consultant shall submit the adopted UWMP electronically using the reporting system established by the DWR. The UWMP should also comply with and address all relevant updated statutes and mandates.

As key sections of the UWMP are developed, namely the demand projection and water shortage contingency planning components, the consultant shall be required to make presentations to the City Council and the public at scheduled Council meetings in conjunction with City staff. The purpose of these presentations will be to solicit City Council and public input well in advance of developing a final draft UWMP. The consultant shall also assist the City with making the required notifications to other local agencies and public hearing notifications as specified by the Act.

Task 3‐ Information and Data Collection
The consultant shall collect information and data in order to update Water Demand Projections for a 20‐year period through 2045. As water demand projections are a core element of an UWMP, collecting data for this task will be the initial priority.

Necessary data for this task includes:

• Demographic data (e.g. population, housing unit and employment projections, etc.) from General Plans for the adjacent cities and the most recent U.S.

Census, etc.;
• Historical and current water production data and consumption data by user class (single ‐ family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, institutional, dedicated irrigation, fire and other). Trends in water use reducti on at the City since 2000 should be analyzed and factored into the demand projection update;
• Data to estimate impacts of the current and future CALGreen Codes and the City’s Water Use Efficiency Standards, as well as the impact of on ‐going behavioral modification/social forming programs;
• Historical and current water savings estimates from on‐going City conservation programs;
• Regulatory limits associated with the Making Water Conservation a California Way of Life legislation and Non-Functional Turf ban;
• Data on customer response to weather and climate and effects of climate change on expected future demand;
• Economic information including historical, current and projected rates in regards to elasticity impacts; and
• Any other information the Consultant feels is necessary or beneficial for this 108
4 task.

Task 4‐ Water Demand Projection
Using the above information, the consultant shall develop water demand projections in five‐ year increments from 2020 through 2045.

Task 5‐ Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP)
Update the City’s WSCP to comply with state requirements, including water supply reliability, water shortage contingency planning, demand reduction actions, enforcement mechanisms, and communication protocols. Incorporate lessons learned from recent drought periods and stakeholder feedback.

Task 6‐ City Council Presentations
In conjunction with City staff, the consultant shall present the draft water demand projections to the City Council and the public at up to two (2) City Council meetings. Based on the input received, the consultant shall make any necessary adjustments to the demand projections and finalize the corresponding chapters of the UWMP. The Consultant shall provide technical expertise and answer questions posed at the City Council meetings, prepare and review draft and final agenda reports, and assist with creation of City Council presentations.

Task 7‐ First Draft Report
In conjunction with staff, the consultant shall present the first draft report to the City Council and the public. Subsequent to the presentation, consultant shall make any necessary adjustments/revisions and finalize the draft report.

Task 8‐ Second Draft Report
The consultant shall identify any remaining data needs and draft any remaining required chapters of the UWMP, any supporting sections (e.g., Table of Contents, List of Tables and Figures, Acronyms and Abbreviations, References, Appendices, etc.), as well as the optional section on climate change impacts to supply, and the checklist developed by DWR to assist DWR with its review.

The consultant shall send electronic copies of the draft UWMP (or notify of the UWMPs availability on ‐line) to select local water agencies and other public agencies designated by City staff, and provide advance notification prior to t he public hearing. Consultant must inform City staff of all requirements, time frames, and costs for obtaining permits from the required regulatory agencies (if any).

The consultant shall present a final draft of the second draft to the City Council and the public for review and make revisions to the UWMP.

Task 9 – Final Plan
In conjunction with City staff, the consultant shall present the final draft to the Council and the public at a public hearing. After the close of the public hearing, the City Council will consider final adoption of the UWMP.
109
5 Task 10 – Submittals
Following adoption of the UWMP, the consultant shall submit the plan electronically as required/requested by the DWR. Please note submissions are due by July 1, 2026, and the City would like to make a good faith effort to submit the Plan to the DWR as soon as possible.

Task 11 – Corrections
Make any corrections identified as necessary by DWR after adoption.

Task 12‐ Deliverables
The Consultant shall provide to the City the following deliverables and services as part of this project and any others the consultant deems necessary to provide a complete UWMP.

A. Draft UWMP
a. One (1) hard copy sent (or notification of plan’s availability on‐line) to stakeholders ( approximately 5 local water agencies and 7 other public agencies) as designated by City staff;
b. Three (3) printed copies submitted to the City; and
c. One (1) electronic version of the complete document in Microsoft Word.

B. Final UWMP
a. Three (3) printed copies and one (1) electronic version of the complete document in both PDF and Microsoft Word.
b. The consultant shall provide expertise, prepare the draft and final City Council staff reports, assist with creation of City Council presentations, and to be available to support staff and answer questions, for up to two (2) City Council meetings.
c. The consultant shall coordinate UWMP adoption, assuring notification requirements for public hearing; and submittal of draft UWMP to all appropriate State, local agencies and stakeholders, d. The consultant shall coordinate with City and County agencies to receive the Final UWMP within 30 days of adoption.
e. The consultant shall coordinate the posting notice and submittal of the Final UWMP to the DWR.

III. TASK ORDER TIME OF COMPLETION

The duration of services required is anticipated to be generally from December 2025 to August 2026.

IV. TASK ORDER
The selected Consultant will be issued a task order through the on -call professional services agreement. No work is authorized and no payments will be made prior to execution of a Task Order.
110
6 V. REQUIRED CONTENTS OF PROPOSAL
Submit three copies of the proposal. Proposals should be concise and specific to this RFP and limited to 8 single sided pages, excluding 1) the cover letter, 2) the cost proposal (in separate sealed envelope) and 3) full resume s and sample documents (specifically described below) included in appendices. Proposals must be in the following format:

1. Consultant Identification:

Provide the legal name of the firm, the firm’s mailing and physical address, the names and contact information of the legally responsible principal and the primary contact person (Project Manager) for this project.

2. Project Understanding and Work Plan:

Explain in detail your understanding proposed work plan, including all anticipated tasks along with any supplemental tasks (those not specifically identified in this RFP) you deem necessary for successful completion of this project. A table shall be provided that identifies the number of labor hours for each phase of the project, by staff level.

3. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC):

Describe the team’s established QA/QC program to be used throughout the Project. Provide the name, licenses and a brief bio of the person responsible for QA/QC.

4. Related Project/Client Information:

Briefly describe three ( 3) comparable projects that best exhibit the firm’s experience in each of the required services. Include the specific project name and location, overall project size and cost, consultant’s contract value, client contact person, including title, organization, address, current telephone number and E-mail address.

5. Individual Staff Experience and Project Organization:
i. Provide an organization chart showing the project manager and key staff members for the project.
ii. Provide a brief bio of each key staff.
iii. Provide a summary of each sub -consultant, their area of responsibility and percentage of the project cost.
iv. Provide a realistic statement of current staffing workload commitments, additional resources of the firm, and ability of the firm(s) to respond to any request for additional or contingency services in a timely manner. v. Provide a statement that the departure, reassignment or substitution for any named member of the designated project team including sub consultant(s) will not be made without prior written approval of the City.

6. Cost Proposal:

Include a cost estimate of all required services and associated fees in a separate document and sealed in an envelope entitled “ENGINEERING 111
7 SERVICES COST PROPOSAL for the CITY OF LINCOLN 2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE”. The cost proposal must:
i. Be broken down by task and personnel category to indicate the level of effort and duration for each task,
ii. Show one hourly rate for each personnel category necessary for each task.
iii. Show all sub-consultants and costs.
iv. Show all other charges.
v. Show a “not to exceed” total for each task.

7. Levine Act Disclosure Form (Attachment B)
Contractor shall provide a completed Levine Act Disclosure Form (Attachment B). A party to a proceeding before an agency involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, including contracts not competitively bid and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder with a re sponsive bid shall disclose on the record of the proceeding any contribution in an amount of more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) made within the preceding 12 months by the party or the party's agent to a City official/campaign. (Gov. Code, § 84308.) For additional information: https://www.lincolnca.gov/our-government/government- transparency/levine-act/.

8. Exceptions
List any exceptions to any portion of this RFP. The City will consider the exception(s) and may or may not reject the RFP as non-responsive.

9. Appendices:

Appendices are not required, will not count against the stated page limit, and may include:
i. Full resumes of key staff
ii. Full project descriptions.

VI. SUBMISSION OF THE PROPOSAL
Submit three (3) bound copies, along with a USB containing an electronic copy of the proposal in Adobe .pdf format in a sealed envelope, complete with the project name noted on this RFP cover sheet delivered to the following address not later than 3:00 p.m. on October 23, 2025 to:

City of Lincoln
City Clerk’s Office
Subject: 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Proposal
Attention: Chris Nelson, Environmental Services Manager 600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648

PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED no later than the time and date stated on the cover sheet of this proposal and at the aforementioned location.

Proposals receiv ed after this time or at any other location will be deemed 112
8 unresponsive and rejected.

VII. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
The City will evaluate and rank the proposals using the following scoring:

Project Understanding & Approach 50 Points
Experience of firm(s) and specific staff 20 Points
References from former clients 20 Points
Completeness and compliance with RFP format 10 Points
Total Points Possible 100 Points

Although not anticipated, at the discretion of the City, one or more of the top ranked teams may be interviewed based upon the relative ranking by total score. Interviews will be for the purpose of meeting the project team, discussion of the scope of work, and review of the factors considered in the preparation of the proposal. The teams may also be requested to provide further clarification of submitted materials and/or submit additional materials for consideration.

After the interviews and review of any a dditional requested materials, the City will begin negotiations with the prime consultant of the top ranked team.

All proposals may become public information subsequent to the On -Call Professional Services Agreement. The Proposer may describe any sensitive or potentially proprietary information in general terms.

The Proposal should reflect the most favorable terms available to the City, as the City may make award on the Proposal alone without interviews or any further contact with the Proposer.

VIII. RFP SCHEDULE
The City of Lincoln has designated the following activities and dates as key to the project schedule:

RFP Schedule

1. RFP Issued September 24, 2025

2. Questions Due October 13, 2025

3. Proposal Due October 23, 2025

4. Interviews (if needed) Week of November 17th

5. City Council Award of Contract December 9, 2025

The City of Lincoln reserves the right to change the RFP schedule.

IX. DOCUMENTS AND QUESTIONS
Direct any questions regarding this RFP to Chris Nelson by Email at [email protected] All questions and requests for clarification must be received no later than 5 pm on the date noted in the schedule above. No meetings will be held 113
9 with prospective consultants to di scuss the RFP. Revisions may be provided via an Addendum. Do not contact any other City staff or consultants to the City.

X. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. All proposals become the property of the City and will not be returned.

2. All costs for proposal preparation shall be borne by the Proposer.

3. The Proposer may withdraw the Proposal or correct a mistake in the Proposal prior to the Proposal deadline by submitting a withdrawal request or correction/addendum in writing. Oral communication will not be accepted.

XI. ATTACHMENTS

A. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan:
https://www.lincolnca.gov/business-and-development/planning-and- development/public-infrastructure-master-
plans/#UrbanWaterManagementPlan(UWMP)
B. Levine Act Disclosure Form

114

10 115
CITY OF LINCOLN | TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
OCTOBER 23, 2025
116
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 cv-i
October 23, 2025
Chris Nelson
Environmental Services Manager
City of Lincoln
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
RE: 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Dear Chris:

West Yost is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Lincoln (City) to prepare the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). We appreciate the opportunity to continue partnering with the City on water planning efforts that ensure reliable, sustainable, and resilient water service to the Lincoln community. Our team brings the depth of experience, technical expertise, and proven methods necessary to deliver a comprehensive, fully compliant, and actionable UWMP that meets all California Water Code requirements and Department of Water Resources (DWR) guidelines and supports the City’s long-term planning goals.

Our firm has successfully supported numerous Northern California agencies with recent UWMPs, Water Shortage Contingency Plans (WSCPs), and Risk and Resilience Assessments.

Through this experience, we have developed a deep understanding of the regulatory requirements, data needs, and planning nuances critical to developing a DWR-accepted plan. For Lincoln, we will build upon the City’s 2020 UWMP, integrate current supply and demand data, conservation programs, and climate resiliency planning, and ensure the plan aligns with the City’s ongoing Water Master Plan Update and regional coordination efforts.

We recognize that Lincoln’s 2025 UWMP is not simply a compliance update—it is an opportunity to establish a strategic and cohesive framework for future water supply and infrastructure investments. Our team will focus on creating a document that is technically robust, transparent, and defensible, while ensuring consistency across all City planning documents and regulatory requirements.

Success on this project requires an experienced, responsive, and collaborative team that understands both the technical requirements and the City’s expectations. West Yost has assembled a proven team with strong water planning expertise and leadership tailored to Lincoln’s needs:
■ Project Manager: Brenda Estrada, PE – Brenda will lead the overall effort, coordinate with City staff, and ensure that all deliverables meet schedule and quality expectations. She brings extensive UWMP and WSCP experience across California and has led multiple municipal water planning projects to successful DWR approval. ■ Deputy Project Manager: Angie Yan, EIT – Angie will provide project coordination, data management, and technical support across all tasks, ensuring efficient delivery and clear communication throughout the project.
■ Principal-in-Charge: Kelye McKinney, PE – Kelye will provide executive oversight and ensure alignment of West Yost’s resources with the project’s objectives. Her leadership guarantees that the City receives our full commitment and highest quality of work. ■ Quality Assurance/Quality Control: Elizabeth Drayer, PE – Elizabeth will provide QA/QC oversight, drawing upon her decades of statewide UWMP and water resource planning experience to ensure technical accuracy, regulatory compliance, and consistency across all sections.

Introductory Letter
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 95618
530.756.5905 phone
530.756.599 1 fax
westyost.com
The Right Team
117
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 cv-ii
West Yost’s approach is based on our streamlined and collaborative process for preparing UWMPs. We will:
ƒ Leverage existing data and City knowledge to efficiently prepare a plan that accurately reflects current and future water supply and demand conditions; ƒ West Yost is currently working on the City's 2025 WMPU, and the work is nearing completion. ƒ Coordinate early and often with City staff to ensure project milestones and review periods align with the City Council's adoption and DWR submittal schedule; ƒ Ensure full compliance with the 2025 DWR Guidebook, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, and all related state requirements; and ƒ Develop a clear, defensible, and actionable plan that integrates climate resilience, water use efficiency, and drought response strategies.

Our goal is to deliver an on-time, technically sound and timely UWMP that reflects Lincoln’s unique system characteristics, planning goals, and regulatory commitments—without unnecessary burden on City staff.

West Yost has previously entered into professional services agreements with the City for prior projects and we are very confident that we will be able to enter into an agreement with the City for this project. West Yost does not list any exceptions.

As Principal-in-Charge, I am authorized to commit West Yost to this project and ensure our full support from start to finish. Please contact either Brenda Estrada or me if you have any questions or would like additional information. We look forward to the opportunity to partner with the City of Lincoln on this important planning effort.

Sincerely,

WEST YOST
Brenda Estrada, PE | Project Manager Kelye McKinney, PE | Principal-in-Charge 530.792.3250 | [email protected] 9 16.846.4687| [email protected] The Right Approach
118
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 1 CALIFORNIA
Concord
Davis (Headquarters)
Irvine
Oceanside
Pleasanton
Sacramento
San Diego
Santa Rosa

ARIZONA
Phoenix
OREGON
Lake Oswego
Medford AZ
CA
OR
Required Information
Legal Name West Yost & Associates, Inc.

Local Address 2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100
Davis, CA 956 1 8
Legally Responsible
Principal
Kelye McKinney,PE Principal-in-Charge
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100 Davis, CA 956 1 8
9 16.846.4687 I [email protected]
Primary Contact Brenda Estrada, PE Project Manager
2020 Research Park Drive, Suite 100, Davis, CA 956 1 8
530.792.3250 I [email protected]
Firm Information
West Yost is a consulting engineering firm founded in 1 990. Our focus is exclusively water, wastewater, recycled water, groundwater, and stormwater. We have broad experience in providing planning, design, construction management, and program management services.

West Yost is headquartered in Davis, California, and has over 250 staff members in 1 1 offices.

Consultant IdentificationSECTION 1
Under the Urban Water Management Planning Act, every urban water supplier in California that delivers more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually or serves over 3,000 urban connections is required to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years. These plans must include specific content as outlined by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The 2025 UWMP is due on July 1, 2026.

West Yost understands the City’s need for a 2025 UWMP that provides an accurate description of the City’s existing and projected future water demands and supplies, is consistent with the City’s other planning efforts, and meets the 2025 UWMP requirements and schedule so that it is accepted by DWR. In developing our approach, we have identified four critical elements to successfully prepare the City’s 2025 UWMP to comply with DWR regulatory and schedule requirements:

1. We will use our knowledge and understanding of the City’s water supply and demands to efficiently prepare the City’s 2025 UWMP. We will coordinate demands with the City’s General Plan and Specific Plans; with the City’s other water system planning efforts, including the 2025 Water Master Plan Update (WMPU); and with Placer County Water Agency (PCWA)’s 2025 UWMP and drought year supply assumptions.

2. We will use a coordinated approach to prepare the City’s 2025 UWMP that complies with California Water Code requirements, DWR guidelines, and the anticipated release of the DWR Guidebook for Preparation of the 2025 UWMPs. No substantive changes to the requirements have been adopted since the completion of the City’s 2020 UWMP. However, a few key updates will need to be provided in the City’s 2025 UWMP and our understanding of the needed updates will allow our team to quickly begin work that will comply with requirements.

3. We will provide an opportunity for early review and input from the City Council and the general public regarding water demands and supply.

4. We will maximize City staff’s limited time by leveraging the considerable data already collected for the WMPU to minimize required data needs and by identifying City support requirements early in the project. We will develop a comprehensive milestone-driven workplan and a clear path for document organization. We have included a data request list in Appendix C to assist the City in initiating this project.

We will use our knowledge and understanding of the City’s water supply and demands to efficiently prepare the City’s 2025 UWMP.

We are uniquely familiar with the City’s existing and future water demands and its water supply portfolio, which includes treated surface water from PCWA, supplemental water from local groundwater supplies, recycled water supplies from the regional wastewater treatment facility operated by the joint powers authority between the City and Placer County (LiSWA), and raw water from PCWA and Nevada Irrigation District (NID). The treated surface water supplies from PCWA facilities include wholesale water supplies from both PCWA and NID.

West Yost’s history supporting the City on the 2025 WMPU, hydraulic model updates, and on-going hydraulic modeling support has provided us an unmatched understanding of the City’s water demands, supply sources, and system reliability. As part of the 2025 WMPU, West Yost has reviewed and projected system demands in coordination with the City’s Planning Department, calibrated the model, and evaluated the existing and future supply portfolio to meet demands. This experience equips us with the insight needed to accurately document current and projected water demand and supply conditions, align the 2025 UWMP with evolving water use efficiency legislation, and support the City’s eligibility for DWR grants and loans.

We understand the City’s plans for growth and its need to clearly and succinctly report its water supply and demands in the City’s 2025 UWMP.

Project Understanding SECTION 2
119
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 2 We will use a coordinated approach to prepare the City’s 2025 UWMP that complies with California Water Code requirements and DWR guidelines.

The primary goal of the City’s 2025 UWMP is to prepare a useful planning document that meets the applicable requirements of the California Water Code and follows the guidelines for 2025 UWMPs that are being prepared by DWR. West Yost staff are members of DWR’s Guidebook Working Group and have been closely following DWR’s progress in the development of the Guidebook for the Preparation of 2025 UWMPs. West Yost understands DWR’s pending 2025 UWMP requirements and has excellent relationships with DWR staff to obtain clarifications as needed. Based on our extensive experience preparing UWMPs and our review of water code changes, West Yost can quickly and efficiently start work on the City’s 2025 UWMP.

UWMP requirements have changed dramatically since the Urban Water Management Planning Act was first passed in 1 983. Recent drought events and climate change concerns have influenced the development and adoption of legislation that have made UWMPs the primary document for reporting on water conservation efforts, compliance requirements, and water shortage contingency planning.

No substantive changes to the requirements have been adopted since the completion of the City’s 2020 UWMP, and DWR has not yet released its guidance for the preparation of the 2025 UWMP. Although the requirements are largely unchanged, the City's 2025 UWMP will include the following key updates:

We will provide an opportunity for early review and input from the City Council and the general public regarding water demands and supply.

We understand the City’s mission of public transparency and the desire for early input from its elected officials and the public pertaining to water supply and demands. Task 3 of our workplan includes working with City staff to prepare the staff report and a presentation for a City Council meeting regarding City water supply and water demand projections. This early public engagement effort will help identify any potential concerns or questions that should be addressed within the 2025 UWMP prior to release of the public draft. We applaud the City for requesting this early public input to minimize the need for document revisions late in the project.

We will maximize City staff’s limited time by leveraging the considerable data already collected for the WMPU to minimize required data needs and by identifying support requirements early in the project. We will develop a comprehensive milestone-driven workplan and a clear path for document organization.

To jump-start the UWMP process, we will provide a comprehensive data request list to the City early in the project. The data we have already collected for the WMPU will be identified in the data request list. We have provided a preliminary data request table in Appendix C of this proposal to help you collect the necessary data to move this project forward quickly. Our strategy for efficient plan development is to craft each chapter of the 2025 UWMP based on DWR guidelines and required DWR tables. While the DWR 2025 UWMP Guidebook has yet to be released, we thoroughly understand the required UWMP components, and we anticipate the required organization of the 2025 UWMP will be similar to the 2020 UWMP (if not the same). 2025 UWMP Key Updates
Drought Risk Assessment: Assess the City’s water supply reliability assuming that the Years 2026 to 2030 will be the five dry consecutive years (CWC §10635(b)).

Water Supply Reliability Assessment: Include an updated water supply and demand assessment which compares the total water supply sources available to the City with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years (to 2045, preferably to 2050) in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years (California Water Code [CWC] §10635(a)).

Water Use Target Compliance: Provide a report on the City’s compliance with adopted 2020 per capita water use targets in accordance with:

Senate Bill X7-7 (Water Conservation Act of 2009, SB X7-7; CWC §10608.20).

Water Loss Quantification: Summarize the City’s system water loss (2020 to 2024), and report on compliance with the City’s distribution loss standards:
(SB 555; CWC §1063 1(d)(3)(c)).

Project Understanding & Work PlanSECTION 2
120
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 3 TABLE 1. ANTICIPATED UWMP CHAPTER CONTENT AND UPDATES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
■ Summary of UWMP findings and conclusions in simple, concise language to serve as the Lay Description required by CWC §10630.5.

CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
■ Introduction and overview of the 2025 UWMP.

CHAPTER 2. PLAN PREPARATION
■ Documentation of the City’s process for plan preparation, along with its coordination efforts with PCWA, NID, the public, and other agencies.

CHAPTER 3. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
■ Updates to the written description of the City’s physical service area, climate, and demographics. ■ Inclusion of updated required maps including a jurisdictional area map, service area map, distribution area map, and system schematic. ■ Description of the City’s seismic risk assessment of water facilities conducted in accordance with CWC §10632.5.

CHAPTER 4. WATER USE CHARACTERIZATION
■ Updates to the historical demand data for the last five years (202 1-2025) and a written description of any updates to the City’s water use reduction plan. ■ Water and recycled water demand projections through 2045 (preferably 2050). ■ Coordinate demand projections with the City’s 2025 WMPU. West Yost will develop demands considering normal, single dry year and five consecutive dry years. We will share this information, with approval from the City, the PCWA for use in their 2025 UWMP. ■ Climate change impacts on water demands, to the extent information is available.

CHAPTER 5. CONSERVATION TARGET COMPLIANCE
■ Report on the City’s compliance with its 2020 per capita water use target.

Table1 outlines the anticipated 2025 UWMP chapters and describes the contents and updates that are anticipated for each chapter.

As such, we will not let a potential delay in the release of the DWR 2025 UWMP Guidebook prevent us from starting the preparation of your 2025 UWMP. West Yost has prepared dozens of UWMPs, and we are familiar with your water system, your water demands, and your water supplies, which will allow us to quickly begin the required updates for the 2025 UWMP.

Our standard practice for preparing UWMPs is to begin with development of a project schedule that plans for the public hearing and adoption of the UWMP to correspond with the City Council’s meeting schedule. The City has established a deadline for completion of the UWMP for adoption no later than the June 9, 2026 City Council Regular Meeting. West Yost will plan for the UWMP adoption in late May to allow West Yost and the City sufficient time to respond to and address any comments received, either from the City Council or the public, in addition to the flexibility to return to the June 9, 2026 City Council meeting, if needed. From the planned City Council meeting date, we work backwards to identify required dates for release of the Draft 2025 UWMP and all public and stakeholder notifications, as well as interim deadlines to allow for sufficient City review time of each chapter.

The 2025 UWMPs are required to include water demand and supply data through December 3 1, 2025; however, this data will not be available until early 2026. In the interim, we will focus on compiling available data and developing plan components that are not dependent on final 2025 data. This initial work includes drafting the plan and system description sections and preparing data files in alignment with DWR table requirements. These files will be structured and ready for input once the 2025 data is available. This phased approach enables timely completion of the DWR-required tables and facilitates the preparation of the Administrative Draft UWMP shortly after the 2025 data is available.

Project Understanding & Work PlanSECTION 2
121
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 4 Proposed Scope of Work and Level of Effort
The 2025 UWMP is due to DWR by July 1, 2026. Our proven workplan and proposed approach and project tasks will enable us to meet the deadline and DWR’s requirements. West Yost will work with City staff to adjust the schedule as needed to coordinate with other City planning efforts. We will review our progress during monthly project check-in meetings.

TABLE 2: CITY OF LINCOLN 2025 UWMP WORK PLAN

KEY TASK ACTIVITIES ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
TASK 1: Kick-Off Meeting, Project Management, and Quality Assurance/Quality Control (City Task 1) ■ Conduct a project kick-off meeting with City staff to review the project work scope, data needs, and project schedule. ■ Coordinate and communicate with City staff regarding project progress and status of the scope, schedule, and budget. ■ Prepare a project checklist that follows DWR 2025 UWMP checklist. ■ Perform QA/QC reviews. West Yost requires all work products to be reviewed at the principal level prior to submittal.

Kick-off meeting anticipated to occur in early
Dec 2025 depending on City staff availability
Monthly progress meetings
TABLE 1. ANTICIPATED UWMP CHAPTER CONTENT AND UPDATES
CHAPTER 6. WATER SUPPLY CHARACTERIZATION
■ Updates to the written descriptions of existing water sources, including purchased wholesale treated and raw water from PCWA, groundwater, recycled water, and NID raw water supply. ■ Updates the description of water transfer opportunities, imported (purchased) supplies, recycled water opportunities, and future water projects. ■ Documentation of the City’s compliance with SGMA, including formation of the West Placer Groundwater Sustainability Agency and GSP preparation and implementation. ■ West Yost will coordinate supply projections with the City’s 2025 WMPU, as appropriate. West Yost will incorporate information on climate change impacts to the City’s water supply sources to the extent information is available.
■ Updates to the City's energy intensity calculations for 2025.

CHAPTER 7 . WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT
■ Evaluation of availability and reliability of water supplies in single dry and multiple dry years. ■ Preparation of a Drought Risk Assessment for the City for the period from 2026 through 2030.

CHAPTER 8. WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING
■ Inclusion of the City’s 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP). ■ Report on the City’s seismic risk assessment of water facilities conducted in accordance with SB 664 based on information from the regional Hazard Mitigation Plan and its America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) compliance documents.

CHAPTER 9. DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES
■ Updates the City may have on current and planned implementation of its Demand Management Measures (DMMs).

CHAPTER 10. PLAN ADOPTION, SUBMITTAL, AND IMPLEMENTATION ■ Documentation of the City’s adoption of the 2025 UWMP SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: APPENDICES WILL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING ■ Energy Intensity Documentation – Inclusion of water energy data is limited to information that the City can readily obtain. The calculation or estimation of energy intensity remains voluntary (CWC §1063 1.2)
■ SB X7-7 tables required by DWR ■ Notification letters of UWMP update ■ Public notice of UWMP hearing ■ UWMP adoption resolution ■ DWR UWMP checklist ■ Water loss audits ■ Updates to the descriptions of water supply reliability, including any changes to regulatory conditions or supply constraints.

Project Understanding & Work PlanSECTION 2
122
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 5 TABLE 2: CITY OF LINCOLN 2025 UWMP WORK PLAN

KEY TASK ACTIVITIES ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
TASK 2: Collect and Review Data (City Tasks 2 and 3)
■ Collect and review data immediately after notice to proceed (e.g., supply updates, demand by supply type and user class, water loss data, and demand management measures).
■ Coordinate with the City’s Community Development Department to obtain demographic data from the City’s General Plans and Village Specific Plans. Discuss strategy for developing growth projections that remain consistent with the City’s 2025 WMPU. Additional data sources may include Placer County, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Department of Finance, and the 2020 US Census. ■ Obtain information from the Placer County Hazard Mitigation Plan (Annex C City of Lincoln) to address 2025 UWMP seismic requirements. ■ Communicate early with PCWA and NID to coordinate the supply and demand information to maintain consistency with PCWA and NID UWMPs, as appropriate.

Start upon notice to proceed
Duration Dec through mid-Jan 2026
TASK 3: Water Supply and Demand Analysis (City Task 4)
■ Develop growth projections, based on Task 2 data, and apply projections to develop future water demand estimates in five-year increments from 2025 to 2045 (preferably 2050) while remaining consistent with the City’s WMPU. ■ Confirm assumptions for single-dry year and multiple-dry year (five-year) conditions for the basis of supply reliability analysis. ■ Analyze and evaluate the City’s water supply portfolio as compared to future water demand under the required hydrologic conditions. ■ Evaluate the City’s compliance with the City’s previously adopted 2020 per capita water use targets in accordance with SB X7-7. ■ Prepare staff report and presentation materials regarding City supplies and water demands. ■ Attend and present at a City Council meeting in advance of releasing the Draft 2025 UWMP.

Start upon completion of Task 2 and continue
through Jan 2026 to obtain and analyze 2025
water use data
Target Council meeting on Feb 24, 2026
TASK 4: Water Shortage and Contingency Plan (City Task 5) ■ Update the City’s WSCP to incorporate lessons learned from the 202 1 to 2022 drought period and stakeholder feedback. ■ Coordinate with City staff to identify opportunities to improve ease and effectiveness of water conservation program implementation to incorporate into the City’s WSCP.

Start Dec 2025 continue through Feb 2025
prior to submittal of Administrative Draft.

TASK 5: Prepare Administrative Draft 2025 UWMP (City Task 7 – First Draft Report) ■ Prepare draft chapters and tables in accordance with the DWR 2025 UWMP Guidebook for City staff review and comment. ■ Submit key chapters of the 2025 UWMP to City staff for review and comment as soon as they are completed to provide for early review and input.

Start Dec 2025 continue through Feb 2026
City staff review time scheduled for March
2026.

TASK 6: Prepare Draft 2025 UWMP (City Tasks 8 and 1 2 – Second Draft Report) ■ Prepare draft chapters and tables in accordance with the DWR 2025 UWMP Guidebook for City staff review and comment. ■ Submit key chapters of the 2025 UWMP to City staff for review and comment as soon as they are completed to provide for early review and input.

Start upon receipt of staff comments with
completion by mid-Apr 2026
Project Understanding & Work PlanSECTION 2
123
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 6 TABLE 3

ESTIMATED LABOR HOURS BY STAFF CLASSIFICATIONVICE

PRESIDENT

ENGINEERING

MANAGER I

PRINCIPAL

ENGINEER II

ENGINEER III

ENGINEER II

TECHNICAL

SPECIALIST II
TOTAL
TASK 1: Kick-Off Meeting, Project Management, and QA/QC 28 25 0 30 2 0 85 TASK 2: Collect and Review Data 0 6 0 9 10 0 25
TASK 3: Water Supply and Demand Analysis 0 5 0 16 53 2 76 TASK 4: Water Shortage and Contingency Plan 0 0 4 0 12 2 18 TASK 5: Prepare Administrative Draft 2025 UWMP 0 12 0 20 76 33 141 TASK 6: Prepare Draft 2025 UWMP 0 2 0 4 8 4 18
TASK 7: City Council Presentations 0 10 0 14 10 4 38
TASK 8: Prepare Final 2025 UWMP 0 1 0 3 8 8 20
TASK 9: Respond to Questions/Comments from DWR 0 2 0 8 0 0 10 TOTAL LABOR HOURS 28 63 4 104 179 53 4 31
Proposed Level of Effort
West Yost has prepared the following table to document the anticipated level of effort required to complete the scope of work. Additional detail regarding level of effort is provided in our cost proposal included as a separate document.

TABLE 2: CITY OF LINCOLN 2025 UWMP WORK PLAN

KEY TASK ACTIVITIES ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE
TASK 7: City Council Presentations (City Task 6)
■ Present Draft 2025 UWMP to City Council and the public. ■ Develop staff report text and a PowerPoint presentation for the Draft 2025 UWMP. ■ Present Final 2025 UWMP to City Council and the public at the required public hearing. ■ Develop staff report text and a PowerPoint presentation for the required public hearing.

Start April 2026 and complete by the end of May 2026 (includes minimum 1 4-day public review period before the required public hearing).

Draft Report: Target Council Meeting on May 1 2, 2026.

Final Report: Target Council meeting on June 9, 2026 (we will work to accelerate, if possible, to 2nd Council meeting in May).

TASK 8: Prepare Final 2025 UWMP (City Task 9, 10, and 1 2 – Final Plan) ■ Incorporate comments from the draft into the Final 2020 UWMP. ■ Produce and submit up to three hard copies and one electronic version of the Final UWMP in both PDF and Microsoft Word to the City.
■ Coordinate with the City and public agencies to receive the Final UWMP within 30 days of adoption. ■ Upload the Final 2025 UWMP to the DWR WUEdata Portal, including noticing of submittal of the Final UWMP to DWR.

Two weeks for production/delivery to the City and submission to DWR of the Final UWMP (ahead of the July 1, 2026, deadline) TASK 9: Respond to Questions/Comments from DWR (City Task 1 1) ■ Support the City in responding to any questions and/corrections from DWR on the submitted 2025 UWMP. West Yost has reserved labor hours to answer questions or comments from DWR
Project Understanding & Work PlanSECTION 2
124
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 7 The West Yost quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) policy outlines the procedures used by West Yost staff to verify the accuracy of technical work products. The procedures are reviewed and updated annually. Business sector managers and practice area leads implement the procedures and train staff in these methods.

West Yost’s QA/QC process for UWMPs is designed to maintain a high standard of accuracy and completeness. Each chapter of the 2025 UWMP will undergo technical review by senior engineering staff, with the full plan undergoing a comprehensive QC review focused on technical accuracy, clarity, and completeness.

PROJECT-LEVEL QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL
West Yost’s project managers drive quality assurance. They properly scope and schedule work so the right resources are available to create high-quality work products. They also assign senior staff in a dedicated quality assurance and quality control role. This reviewer checks all figures for accuracy and conformance to standards, reviews spreadsheets and calculations, and checks formulas. Technical staff and word processing staff review documents, including letters, technical memoranda, and reports to confirm technical content and compliance with our standards. The project manager works with project staff to implement processes to incorporate the company’s expectations for work products.

A dedicated technical reviewer provides quality control at the project level. This reviewer is an experienced project manager who has led similar projects. For the City’s 2025 UWMP , Elizabeth Drayer, PE, will be our QA/QC reviewer. Elizabeth will review all documents and deliverables prior to delivery to the City. She will use both the DWR UWMP checklist and West Yost’s proven internal QA/QC guidelines. Elizabeth has been preparing UWMPs since 1 990 and has provided QA/ QC for many UWMPs and other related work. Her additional qualifications are included on Page 8 of this proposal, along with a full resume detailing further relevant work experience in Appendix A. In addition, our Deliverables Team will conduct a final document review to uphold West Yost’s high standards for document quality.

West Yost has significant experience preparing UWMPs that are accepted by DWR the first time they are submitted. Our success is based on meeting all UWMP requirements in the plan document. We will align the City’s 2025 UWMP with the plan outline recommended in the DWR 2025 UWMP Guidebook and use the DWR UWMP checklist throughout the entire plan preparation process to confirm all plan elements are addressed. We will review progress on checklist items during monthly progress meetings. We will demonstrate to DWR that we have met requirements by including a copy of the completed checklist in an appendix and identifying these elements in the City’s 2025 UWMP.

Related Project/Client Information
Comparable reference projects are listed below. Full descriptions for these projects and others are included in Appendix B.

Project Name
& Location
2015 and 2020 UWMPs
City of Sacramento, CA
2020 UWMP
City of Dixon, CA
2020 UWMP
City of Lincoln, CA
Size & Cost The size and cost for the projects listed is equivalent to the contract value noted below.

Contract Value $96,000 (201 5), $106,000 (2020) $82,000 $94,000 Client Contact Brett Ewart, PE Senior Engineer
1 395 35th Ave, Sacramento, CA 95822 I 9 16.808. 1 725
[email protected]
Josh Hudson Water Operations Supervisor
1 7 1 S. Fifth St, Dixon CA 95620 I 530.682.3265
[email protected]
Araceli Cazarez, PE Engineering Manager
600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA 95648 I 9 16.434.2486
[email protected]
West Yost
Team
■ Elizabeth Drayer (P.IC)
■ Brenda Estrada (QA/QC)
■ Rhodora Biagtan (Project Manager}
■ Brenda Estrada (QA/QC)
■ Brenda Estrada (Project Manager)
■ Elizabeth Drayer (Principal-in-Charge, QA/QC) ■ Angie Yan (Project Engineer) Quality Assurance/Quality ControlSECTION 3
SECTION 4
125
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 8 West Yost has the expertise to successfully complete the City’s 2025 UWMP. All team members are committed to the duration of this project. Detailed staff resumes can be found in Appendix A.

Our team has a proven track record of preparing UWMPs that meet DWR requirements including extensive knowledge of the City’s water supplies gained from work on City water planning projects. Our team recently participated in DWR’s 2025 UWMP Submittal Table User Testing Program to assist in troubleshooting the required tables that are being developed for 2025 UWMPs. As such, our team has advanced knowledge of the DWR guidelines set to be published and can plan accordingly.

Staff Engineer
Ruby Lang
Regulatory Support
Rhodora Biagtan, PE
Brenda Estrada, PE

PROJECT MANAGER
Kelye McKinney, PE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Elizabeth Drayer, PE
QA/QC
Angie Yan, EIT

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
City of LincolnIndividual Staff Experience and Project OrganizationSECTION 3 Brenda Estrada, PE PROJECT MANAGER
Brenda Estrada will be the City’s point of contact and will lead efforts to complete the UWMP. She is an experienced hydraulic engineer who has prepared many water master plans, including demand projections and supply capacity for large and small agencies. She has worked on Urban Water Management Plans since 2000. Brenda is working with the City on hydraulic modeling-related projects, including the City’s recent hydraulic model update and several hydraulic-related evaluations. Brenda will serve as the Project Manager and primary point of contact for this project and is committed for the duration of this project.

Angie Yan, EIT DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Angie Yan is a civil engineer-in-training specializing in water resources planning. She has experience preparing multiple UWMPs and water master plans. Angie plays a key role in preparing the City's Water Master Plan Update and in providing the City with ongoing hydraulic modeling support. She is proficient in GIS (ArcGIS Pro and ArcMap) and hydraulic modeling software (InfoWater, InfoWater Pro, and AquaTwin Water).

Kelye McKinney, PE PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Kelye is a civil engineer with a focus in the environmental engineering and utilities industry. She is an experienced manager who specializes in leading strategic multi-stakeholder initiatives, master planning, asset management and operation and resource planning. As Principal-in-Charge, Kelye will oversee that West Yost’s resources are available for the duration of the work and provide another avenue for project communication.

Elizabeth Drayer, PE QA/QC
Elizabeth will serve as QA/QC for this project. Elizabeth has more than 37 years of experience leading complex water resource and master planning projects. She has contributed to more than 50 UWMPs since 1990 and has led West Yost’s UWMP development teams since 201 5. Elizabeth will offer expertise in compliance and technical documentation. She has reviewed and interpreted UWMP requirements and tools from DWR for over 30 years. She uses her expertise to develop and share practical approaches for complying with the requirements of the California Water Code and DWR’s Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers.

Ruby Lang STAFF ENGINEER
Ruby is a water resources engineer specializing in water system planning, drought resilience, and regulatory compliance. Ruby’s experience includes water demand forecasting, risk and resilience analysis, and capital improvement planning, as well as using ArcGIS and InfoWater. Ruby brings a strong technical background and a collaborative approach to help clients develop actionable, data-driven strategies that enhance system reliability and long-term sustainability. As staff engineer, Ruby will assist in developing Draft Chapters of the UWMP.

Rhodora Biagtan, PE REGULATORY SUPPORT
Rhodora brings 30 years of experience in the water and wastewater industry, with deep expertise in master planning, recycled water programs, water conservation, and utility permitting.

Rhodora is leading West Yost’s 2025 UWMP team to confirm that all plans being prepared by West Yost meet the requirements of the California Water Code and the guidelines set by DWR. Rhodora will be available to support the update of Demand Management Measures and the Water Shortage Contingency Plan. Her focus will be to ensure alignment with current regulatory requirements and recommended best practices. 126
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A1
ƒ Brenda Estrada, PE
ƒ Angie Yan, EIT
ƒ Kelye McKinney, PE
ƒ Elizabeth Drayer, PE
ƒ Rhodora Biagtan, PE
ƒ Ruby Lang
ResumesAPPENDIX A
127
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A2

Brenda Estrada, PE

PROJECT MANAGER

Brenda Estrada is an experienced water resource planning engineer with a focus on facilities planning and hydraulic modeling of distribution systems. She has prepared numerous water master plans for small and large water agencies, including demand proje ctions, supply capacity analyses, and water quality evaluations.

EXPERIENCE

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Lincoln, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Lincoln. Tasks included review of water demand projections, water supply availability and reliability from Placer County Water Agency and City groundwater wells, SB X7-7 compliance, demand management measures, and the City’s water shortage contingency plan. The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Sacramento, CA: QA/QC reviewer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Sacramento. Tasks included coordination with the internal project team to prepare the Administrat ive Draft, Public Draft, and Final 2020 UWMP for submittal to the Department of Water Resources.

2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Dixon, CA: QA/QC reviewer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Sacramento. Tasks included coordination with the internal project team to prepare the Administrative Draft, Public Draft, and Final 2020 UWMP for submittal to the Department of Water Resources.

2015 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Sacramento, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Sacramento. The UWMP was prepared on a fast -track schedule to meet submittal deadline requirements.

The City is both a retail and wholesale agency and the UWMP reflects information for both. Tasks include review of water demand projections, water supply availability and reliability from the City’s American River surface water, Sacramento River surface water, and groundwater sources, SB x7-7 compliance, demand management measures, and the City’s water shortage contingency plan. 2015 UWMP to be prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and Department of Water Resources’ Guidebook for the Preparation of 2015 UWMPs.

2015 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Woodland, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Woodland. Tasks included review of water demand projections, water supply availability and reliability from the City’s new surface water supply source and existing groundwater supplies, SB X7 -7 compliance, demand management measures, and

Staff Title: Engineer Manager I
Office Location: Davis, CA
Years of Experience: 27
Years with West Yost: 17
Professional Registrations
 Professional Civil Engineer
California No. 67062
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
California, Davis
Professional Affiliations
 American Water Works Association
Publications
 Unidirectional Flushing Headlines
Water Quality Programs,” Brenda
Estrada & Charles Duncan, AWWA
Opflow, June2016

128
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A3
Brenda Estrada, PE

2 the City’s water shortage contingency plan. 2015 UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and Department of Water Resources’ Guidebook for the Preparation of 2015 UWMPs.

2010 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Woodland, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan for the C ity of Woodland.

Responsible for evaluating baseline per capita water use based on historical water use and population data and recommending i nterim (2015) and final (2020) per capita water use targets for the City in accordance with the requirements of th e Water conservation Act of 2009 (SB x7-7); making a presentation to City Council on proposed compliance with SB x7-7; preparing the 2010 UWMP; and completing the UWMP checklist developed by DWR to ensure that the completed plan me t the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act.

2000 Urban Water Management Plan Update, Nevada Irrigation District, Grass Valley, CA: Prepared an update to the District’s Urban Water Management Plan by evaluating DWR requirements, reviewing existing plans, and requesting needed information from the District. Prepared and presented a rev iew of the draft plan to the public and District’s Board of Directors.

WATER SYSTEM PLANNING AND MODELING
Water Master Plan Update, City of Lincoln, CA: Project Manager for the update to the City of Lincoln’s Water Master Plan. West Yost is working with the City of Lincoln to update its Water Master Plan. The Water Master Plan will provide the City with a comprehensive evaluation and long -term strategy to ensure the City’s water system can meet current and future demands. The Water Master Plan evaluates the existing water supply, distribution, and storage infrastructure, using the calibrated hydraulic model to assess system performance. It identifies near-term and long-range improvements needed to maintain reliable water service and support to planned growth within the City’s service area and Sphere of Influence.

Water Master Plan Update, City of Vacaville, CA: Project Manager for the update to the City of Vacaville’s Water Master Plan. Brenda is responsible for coordinating with City staff and internal staff for the update to the City of Vacaville’s Water Master Plan. The Water Master Plan is a continuation from the Water System Hydraulic Model Engineering Service project that updated and calibrated the City’s existing hydraulic model. The Master Plan includes updating demand fac tors, estimating future demands using current General Plan land use projections, summarizing the City’s future water supply plan, and evaluating capital improvements needed under existing and future demand pro jections.

Water Master Plan and Hydraulic Model Support, City of Petaluma, CA: Project Manager for the Water System Master Plan. West Yost is working with City staff to prepare a Water System Master Plan which will update demand factors based on recent historical demand patterns, update projected demands using updated General Plan land use, summarize existing and projected supply availability, review and update operational and performance criteria, and prepare a CIP. As part of the project. West Yost prepared a table of other agencies’ operational and performance criteria to see how the City’s fire flow requirements, storage calculat ion, and system pressures compare to the other agencies. This project is ongoing.

Hydraulic Model Support, City of Lincoln, CA: Project Manager for annual hydraulic model support. Hydraulic model support provided to the City includes, fire flow evaluati ons for new developments, CIP improvement review, and updated water unit use factors. West Yost provides on -going hydraulic model support to the City to verify adequacy of new developments to meet required fire flow. West Yost also updates the City’s hydraul ic model to include new facilities added to the system including a new storage tank and new pipelines as well as replacement pipelines.

129
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A4

Angie Yan, EIT

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER

Angie Yan is a civil engineer-in-training specializing in water resources planning. She has experience in preparing urban water management plans and water master plans and performing hydraulic model evaluations for small and large water systems. Angie is proficient in GIS including ArcGIS Pro and ArcMap as well as hydraulic modeling software including InfoWater, InfoWater Pro, and AquaTwin Water.

EXPERIENCE

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Dixon, CA: Project Engineer for the preparation of the City of Dixon’s first Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). As the plan was a first for the City, it required coordination with the City’s new General Plan and pending Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan. It also required the preparation of the City’s first Water Shortage Contingency Plan and Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment. Evaluated DWR requirements, reviewed and compiled data sent by the City, calculated the City’s water demands and supplies for the last five years, projected future water demands and supplies through 2045, compiled the City’s water demand management measures, and drafted report chapters. Contributed to the creation of the City’s water shortage contingency plan.

The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Manteca, CA: Staff Engineer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Manteca. Evaluated DWR requirements, reviewed and compiled data sent by the City, calculated the City’s water demands and supplies for the last five years, projected future water demands and supplies through 2045, compiled the City’s water demand management measures, and drafted report chapters. Contributed to the creation of the City’s water shortage contingency plan. The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook . 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Turlock, CA: Staff Engineer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Turlock. Evaluated DWR requirements, reviewed and compiled data sent by the City, calculated the City’ s water demands and supplies for the last five years, projected future water demands and supplies through 2045, compiled the City’s water demand management measures, and drafted report chapters. Contributed to the update of the City’s water shortage contingency plan.

The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Woodland, CA: Staff Engineer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Woodland. Evaluated DWR requirements, reviewed and compiled data sent by the City, calculated the City’s water demands and supplies for the last five years, projected future water demands and supplies through 2045, compiled the

Staff Title: Engineer III
Office Location: Pleasanton, CA
Years of Experience: 6
Years with West Yost: 6
Professional Registrations
 Engineer-In-Training, California
No. 172428
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
California, Irvine

130
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A5
Angie Yan, EIT

2 City’s water demand management measures, and drafted report chapters. Contributed to the update of the water shortage contingency plan. The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency, CA: Staff Engineer for the preparation of a 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency. Evaluated DWR requirements, reviewed and compiled data sent by the City, calculated the City’s wate r demands and supplies for the last five years, projected future water demands and supplies through 2045, compiled the City’s water demand management measures , and drafted report chapters.

Contributed to the update of the City’s water shortage contingency plan. The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.

WATER SYSTEM PLANNING AND MODELING
Water Master Plan Update, City of Lincoln, CA: Project Engineer for the update to the City of Lincoln’s Water Master Plan. West Yost is working with the City of Lincoln to update its Water Master Plan. The Water Master Plan will provide the City with a comprehensive evaluation and long -term strategy to ensure the City’s water system can meet current and future demands. The Water Master Plan evaluates the existing water supply, distribution, and storage infrast ructure, using the calibrated hydraulic model to assess system performance. It identifies near-term and long-range improvements needed to maintain reliable water service and support to planned growth within the City’s service area and Sphere of Influence.

Hydraulic Model Support, City of Lincoln, CA: Project Engineer for on-going technical support for the City’s water system hydraulic model. West Yost provides hydraulic model support to the City to verify adequacy of new developments to meet required fire flow and to provide as -needed guidance and model training to City staff on performing hydraulic model evaluations. Tasks include updat ing the City’s hydraulic model with proposed pipelines for new developments, estimating and allocating water demands, and determining the available fire flow during the maximum day demand condition while meeting the City’s water system performance criteria.

Water System Hydraulic Model Update (FY 21/22), City of Lincoln, CA: Project Engineer for the hydraulic model update and hydraulic evaluations of the City’s water system hydraulic model for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/2022. Allocated water demands to individual pressure zones after spatially linking the Cit y’s 2021 consumption data to GIS meter locations. Updated pipeline alignments and diameters in the hydraulic model using the City’s GIS data. Completed a SCAD A verification of the City’s hydraulic model.

Performed hydraulic evaluations on the City’s near-term and build-out system to confirm and recommend alterations to the water system infrastructure proposed in the City’s 2017 Water Master Plan.

Water Master Plan, Suisun-Solano Water Authority, CA: Staff Engineer for the development of Suisun-Solano Water Authority (SSWA)’s Water Master Plan. Developed SSWA’s hydraulic model in AquaTwin Water, allocated water demands after spatially linking SSWA’s 2022 consumption data to GIS meter locations, and calibrated and validated the hydraulic model. Performed hydraulic evaluations on the existing water system under maximum day demand and maxi mum day demand plus fire flow conditions to evaluate existing system deficiencies, and under a winter demand condition to evaluate water age.

Water Supply and Facility Master Plan Updates, California Water Service, Bear Gulch and Selma Districts, CA: Staff Engineer for the update of Cal Water’s Water Supply and Facilities Master Plans (WSFMPs). These projects are a collaborative effort with Cal Water staff to develop updated WSFMPs through summary and analyses of the planning data obtained from and developed by Cal Water (demand projections, supply plans, asset management plans, hydraulic m odel, etc.). The goal of the WSFMP is to provide an updated Capital Improvement Plan to support the next two General Rate Cases. Tasks included documenting changes to each District’s existing water system and water supply sources, updating current and future demand projections, completing a water system evaluati on to identify system deficiencies, recommending asset replacements based on Cal Water asset management program objectives, reviewing planned capital projects, and recommending capital improvement projects.

131
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A6

Kelye McKinney, PE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

1 Kelye McKinney is a civil engineer with a focus in the environmental engineering and utilities industry. She is an experience d manager who specializes in program and project management, leading strategic multi -stakeholder initiatives, master planning, asset management and operation and resource planning. She serves as Principal -in Charge on numerous projects with various West Yost clients. She previously worked for the City of Roseville in the Environmental Utilities Department, where she was most recent ly the Assistant Director of Technical Services. In her capacity, she led the technical services team for the water, wastewater, r ecycled water, and solid waste utilities including master planning, capital plan implementation, asset management, utility safety, and land development activities from entitlement through acceptance.

Experience
2025 Water Master Plan Update, City of Lincoln, CA: Principal-in-Charge for the West Yost’s current work with the City on updating the City of Lincoln’s Water Master Plan. The Water Master Plan will provide the City with a comprehensive evaluation and long -term strategy to ensure the City’s water system can meet current and future demands. The Water Master Plan evaluates the existing water supply, distribution, and storage infrastructure, using the calibrated hydraulic model to assess system performance. It identifies near - term and long-range improvements needed to maintain reliable water service and support to planned growth within the City’s service area and Sphere of Influence.
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Lincoln CA: Kelye provided strategic support to and document review for the project team preparing the update to the City of Lincoln’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.

Support Services, City of Lincoln, CA: Principal-in-Charge for technical and advisory support for groundwater projects including the regional water bank, groundwater supply planning, evaluation of groundwater recharge opportunities, and assistance with stake holder communications.

Phase 1 and 2 - Developer Standards Updates, Citrus Heights Water District, CA: Principal-in-Charge for update to the Citrus Heights Water District’s improvement standards, submittal requirements, drafting standards, procedures, and policies as they pertain to proposed developments and improvements within its service area.

Third Party Review & Modeling Services, Sacramento County Water Agency, CA: Principal-in-Charge for on-call services to perform review of drainage studies for compliance with the Sacramento County Drainage Study Requirements, the Sacramento County Hydrology Manual, Volume 2, FEMA floodplain standards, Sacramento Region Stormwater Quality Design Manual, and the County of Sacramento Improvement Standards. West Yost is also reviewing hydrologic and hydraulic models prepared by others for support of drainage studies and preparation of improvement plans.

Staff Title: Engineering Manager I
Office Location: Davis, CA
Years of Experience: 35
Years with West Yost: 7
Professional Registrations
 Professional Civil Engineer,
California No. 49414
Education
 BS, Civil Engineering,
University of Nevada, Reno
Professional Affiliations
 Groundwater Resources Association

132
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A7
Kelye McKinney, PE

Natomas Area Water Supply Study, Sacramento County Water Agency, CA: Principal-in-Charge for the Natomas Basin Water Supply Study. This project included the review of surface water supplies, and surface water rights/contracts and associated places of use for three urbanization areas of inter est. West Yost also is investigating existing and future water supply facilities that might be available to serve the three urbanization areas including water diversion, treatment an d distribution infrastructure owned or operated by the Sacramento County Water Agency and by other water agencies. 2018 America’s Water Infrastructure Act Risk and Resilience Assessment (RRA) and Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Compliance Pro ject, City of Lincoln, CA: Principal-in- Charge. West Yost is assisting the City with their all-hazards America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) 2018-compliant RRA and ERP. A thorough gap analysis follows reviewing and organization of previously completed related resources. RRAs/ERP s are conducted according to the American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards and represent cross-sector best practices. Each RRA considers natural, built, cyber, and personnel assets and any relevant threats and hazards. Ri sk and resilience management strategies are developed to address the highest risks and reduce vulnerabilities. Next, an ERP is developed. This is built on existing emerg ency preparedness plans and refined to align with AWIA and state requirements and industry best practices. Finally, self-certification documentation is prepared for submittal to the Environmental Protection Agency.

Septic to Sewer Evaluation Program, Sacramento Area Sewer District, Sacramento, CA: Principal-In-Charge for the SacSewer District’s Septic to Sewer Evaluation Program.

Program included a Feasibility Report that addressed technical feasibility along with public outreach, public acceptance, and potential for funding for five small, disadvantaged communities to convert from septic to sewer systems. Work also included multiple public outreach meetings, preparation of out reach materials, funding opportunities research and coordination, grant applications, technical reports for use in the Small Community Wastewater Grant applications, and coo rdination of four income surveys to establish eligibility for grants.

Water System Rehabilitation Project #2, City of Folsom, CA: Principal -In-Charge. This $1.4 million project covered the construction of numerous valves and connections to help improve the reliability and redundancy of the water system in the City and performing related required work. There are 12 dif ferent locations in the public right of way and/ or on private property. Key elements of the project included coordination with the City for pressure testing, disinfection, and tie in of new pipe to the existing water system, public outreach, advanced notification to residents and commercial locations about water outages, and coordination with local hospital to ensure minimal water outages while the piping was being installed.
24th Street and K Street Combined Sewer System Storage Project, City of Sacramento, CA: Principal-in-Charge for the design of approximately 2,900 feet of 120-inch-diameter pipe in midtown Sacramento on 24th Street between N Street and H Street. The project is part of the City’s Long Term Control Plan for reducing flooding of its combined sew er system (CSS). The project included the development of a preliminary design report, constructability reviews, CEQA services, utility locating/potholing, and public out reach.

Owner’s Representative Services, Well 80, Wells 81 A, B, C, and Well 82, Sacramento Suburban Water District, CA: Project Manager. Kelye serves as the Project Manager for the Sacramento Suburban Water District (SSWD) for the construction of three new monitoring wells and four new groundwater wel ls and associated pumping and treatment facilities. The projects are being constructed under a progressive design-build project delivery process. Kelye serves as the West Yost Project Manager for Owner Representative Services. As the Owner’s Representative West Yost is representing SSWD in the contracting and management of the progressive design -build team including preparation of the preliminary site plan for one of the three facilities, is assisting with contracting and contra ct management, and is also providing construction management and inspection services as part of the Owners Representative’s role.

Sustainable Agricultural Groundwater Recharge Program Framework Report, Placer County, CA: Project Manager. Kelye led the development of the Sustainable Agricultural Groundwater Recharge Program Framework Report. The report outlines a methodology for identifying and supporting groundwater r echarge projects to meet the County’s sustainable groundwater management objectives including a fee program aligned with Development Agreement obligations. The program seeks to enh ance groundwater supplies by identifying and implementing feasible recharge projects that directly benefit agricultural users.

133
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A8

Elizabeth Drayer, PE

QA/QC REVIEWER

Elizabeth’s expertise is in water resources engineering and multi-disciplinary project teams. She has experience leading water resources planning studies and design projects and specializes in water supply and infrastructure master planning. She has prepar ed more than 24 water and utility master plans, more than 20 water supply assessments, and more than 5 0 urban water management plans. She has also prepared many other studies and plans for clients including groundwater studies, drought response and water shortage contingency plans, facility operations plans, and emergency operations plans involving the eva luation of existing facilities, evaluation of existing and future water demands, identification of system deficiencies and needs, evaluation of water supply alternatives, and development of recommendations for capital improvements. Elizabeth is a West Yost Vice President and currently serves as West Yost’s Chief Engineer-Scientist, overseeing the firm’s Technical Resources Program.

EXPERIENCE
2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Stockton, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of the 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Project tasks include review of the City’s water demands and water supplies for the last five years, projection of future water demands and water supplies through 2045, a report on the City’s compliance with its SB X7- 7 per capita water use target for 2020, consideration of the impacts of Senate Bill 606 and Assembly Bill 1668 on the City’s future water demands, an update of the City’s on-going and planned water demand measures, and an update of the City’s water shortage contingency plan.

West Yost assisted City staff during the public hearing and City Council adoption of the 2020 UWMP and uploaded the final pla n to the Department of Water Resources Water Use Efficiency data portal.

Water Master Plan, City of Stockton, CA: Project Manager for an update to the Water Master Plan that evaluated water system infrastructure needs and recommended an updated capital improvement plan that supports buildout of the recently updated Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan. Project tasks included confirmation of goals, strategies, and priorities for the City’s water sys tem; update and calibration of the City’s water system hydraulic model; evaluation of recent water use trends and development of futur e water use projections based on planned development; hydraulic analysis of the City’s water system to identify needed water system improvements; and development of a prioritized capital improvement program to implement recommendations. West Yost will prov ide training for City staff on the update and use of the hydraulic model, and West Yost will provide multi -year technical support for model updates and hydraulic analysis of proposed development projects.

2015 and 2020 Urban Water Management Plans, Various Clients: Served as the leader and coordinator of West Yost’s 2015 and 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) development team, responsible for review and interpretation of Department of Water Resources (DWR) UWMP requirements and tools (including UWMP standard ta bles, population tool and AWWA water audit software), development of practical approaches for UWMP preparation, understanding of information and data requirements, development of

Staff Title: Vice President
Office Location: Pleasanton, CA
Years of Experience: 37
Years with West Yost: 25
Professional Registrations
 Professional Civil Engineer, California
No. 46872
Education
 MS, Structural Engineering, University
of California, Berkeley
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley
Certifications
 Underground Storage Tank Installation
 UC Davis Extension, 32-hour Course,
Groundwater Hydrology
 UC Davis Extension, 32-hour Course,
Principles of Toxicology
Professional Affiliations
 American Society of Civil Engineers
 American Water Works Association
 Association of California Water
Agencies
 WateReuse Association

134
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A9
Elizabeth Drayer, PE

2 standardized document outlines and templates, liaison with DWR’s UWMP staff, team coordination and communications, and quality assurance/quality control. Under Elizabeth’s leadership, the West Yost team prepared sixteen 2015 UWMPs, all of which were determined by DWR to address the requirements of the California Water Code. As summarized below, 2015 UWMPs were prepared for the cities of Antioch, Modesto, Pleasanton, Roseville, Sacramento, Sa n Bruno, Santa Rosa, Turlock, Ukiah, and Woodland, as well as the Coastside County Water District, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Fontana Water Company, Mountain House Community Services District, Olivehurst Public Utility District, and Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency. 2020 UWMPs were prepared for the cities of Lincoln, Modesto, Napa, Petaluma, Pleasanton, Sacramento, San Bruno, Santa Rosa, Stockton, Turlock, and Woodland, as well as the Coastside County Water District, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Fontana Water Company, Mountain House Community Services District, Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District, Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency, and Zone 7 Water Agency.

2010, 2015, and 2020 Urban Water Management Plans, City of Modesto and Modesto Irrigation District, CA: QC Reviewer for the preparation of a 2020 Joint Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Modesto and Modesto Irrigation District, Project Manager for the 2015 UWMP for the City of Modesto, and Project Engineer for the preparation of a Joint 2010 UWMP for the City of Modesto and Modesto Irrigation District. Tasks include review of water demand projections, water supply availability and reliability from surface water and groundwater, SB X7 -7 compliance, demand management measures, and the City’s wa ter shortage contingency plan. The UWMPs were prepared in compliance with the retail and wholesale water supplier requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.

Water Master Plan Update, City of Sacramento, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of an update to the City’s Water Master Plan. Tasks include evaluation of existing and future demands, including the impacts of the passages of SB 606 and AB 1668, which will establish urban water use efficie ncy standards for residential indoor water use, residential outdoor water use, commercial, industrial and institutional outdoor irrigation use, and water losses. The Ci ty’s existing water supplies will be reviewed, and future potential supply alternatives will be evaluated. A prioritized capital improvement program will be developed to meet the City’s needs through buildout of the City’s General Plan.

Water System Master Plan and Capacity Reserve Fee Study, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of a Water System Master Plan and Capacity Reserve Fee Study for the District. Tasks included a review and update of the District’s system perf ormance criteria; development of potable and recycled water demand projections; update of hydraulic water system models for the potable and recycled water systems; hydraulic analysis of existing and future conditions including 2020, buildout (based on adopted general plans), and ultimate planning horizons; development of a prioritized capital improvem ent plan; and performance of a water system capacity reserve fee study.

Water Master Plan Update, City of Ceres, CA: QC Reviewer for the preparation of a Water Master Plan Update for the City of Ceres. The Water Master Plan Update projected future water demands and evaluated the ability of the City’s water supplies (including groundwater and treated wate r supplies from the recently completed Stanislaus Regional Water Authority water treatment plant) and water system infrastructure to meet those demands. Tasks included review of draft chapters, tables and figures and the overall water master plan report to ensure accuracy, clarity, consistency and conciseness throughout the report.

Water Master Plan, City of Roseville, CA: QC reviewer for the preparation of a Water Master Plan for the City of Roseville, including review of draft chapters, tables and figures and the overall water master plan report to ensure accuracy, clarity, consistency and conciseness throughout the report. Task lead for evaluation of existing and future water supply options, including review and evaluation of existing water supply availability and reliability and options for additional water supplies. Coordinated with City staff to evaluate, compare and document potential water supply options.

135
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A 10

Rhodora N. Biagtan, PE

REGULATORY SUPPORT

1 Rhodora specializes in master planning, recycled water program planning and implementation, water conservation, development permitting, and project management. She has 29 years of experience in the water and wastewater industry, including almost 24 years working in a public utilities district that provided potable water, recycled water, and wastewater services. Almost three of those years were as the interim engineering services manager and district engineer, where she managed the agency’s capital improvement program, utility planning, development services, permitting, asset management, GIS/mapping, environmental compliance, and water conservation. She has experience working in collaborative relationships with other agencies and organizations and has served in leadership roles in water-focused organizations.

EXPERIENCE
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN, VARIOUS CLIENTS: Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Reviewer. The Urban Water Management Planning Act was updated in 2018 to include significant legislative requirements associated with drought planning in response to the 2012 to 2016 statewide drought. Rhodora served as a technical resource for West Yost’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) development team, responsible for interpreting and addressing updated legislative requirements associated with Water Shortage Contingency Plan, compliance with Delta Plan Policy WR P1 on demonstration of reduced Delta Reliance, and drought resiliency planning. Rhodora developed a framework to address new requirements associated with Water Shortage Contingency Planning and drought risk assessment. She also provided guidance on demand management measures. As requested by agencies, Rhodora reviewed municipal and district codes associated with water conservation and water shortage emergency and suggested revisions so that they are consistent with new legislative requirements and their updated Water Shortage Contingency Plans. Rhodora provided QA/QC review of several UWMPs for conformance with the Department of Water Resources’ UWMP Guidebook 2020.

Rhodora supported the preparation of thirteen of the nineteen 2020 UWMPs prepared by the team for the Cities of Lincoln, Modesto, Napa, Pleasanton, Sacramento, San Bruno, Stockton, and Turlock; Dublin San Ramon Services District; Fontana Water Company; Rincon Del Diablo Municipal Water District; Woodland-Davis Clean Water Agency; and Zone 7 Water Agency. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, CA: Project Manager for the preparation of the District’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Plan preparation included integration of the results of the Zone 7 Water Agency (wholesale supplier) Tri-Valley Municipal and Industrial Water Demand Study, District’s update to its Alternative Water Supply Study, and the Association of Bay Area Governments’ Regional Housing Needs Allocation, which were all in progress at the time. The plan required coordination with its wholesaler’s UWMP and compliance with Delta Plan Policy WR P1 on demonstration of reduced Delta Reliance. The development of District’s updated WSCP was coordinated with the region’s wholesale agency and the other water retailers. Rhodora worked with District staff to update ordinances and municipal code to be consistent with the revised WSC P.

Staff Title: Principal Engineer II
Office Location: Sacramento, CA
Years of Experience: 29
Years with West Yost: 5
Professional Registrations
 Professional Civil Engineer,
California No. 59371
Education
 MS, Civil & Environmental
Engineering, University of California,
Davis
 MBA, Natural Resource
Management, Graduate School of
Management, University of
California, Davis
 BS, Civil Engineering and Materials
Science & Engineering, University of
California, Davis
Professional Affiliations
 WateReuse California – NorCal
- California Conference Technical
Committee Co-chair (2022)
- Board of Trustee Representative
(2019 and 2020)
- President (2017 and 2018)
 California Water Environment
Association
 Bay Area Water Works Association
136
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A 11
Rhodora N. Biagtan, PE

2 2015, 2010, and 2005 Urban Water Management Plans, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, CA: Project Manager. Rhodora coordinated with internal staff to provide water demand and projections to the selected consultant. Rhodora reviewed and commented on the plan throughout its progress. She collaborated with the regional water agencies to develop a regionally consistent water shortage contingency plan for incorporation their respective Urban Water Management Plans. As the District’s project manager, Rhodora was responsible for including the project in the agency’s operating budget, monitoring and updating the project budget and schedule, procuring a consultant through a Request for Proposal Process, and negotiating and administering consultant contracts.

Water Conservation Program Management, Dublin San Ramon Services District, Dublin, CA: As a Principal Engineer and Division Manager, Rhodora was responsible for the administration of the District’s water conservation program. She managed the implementation of demand management measures and worked with the District’s public outreach team to promote water use efficiency. She revised the District’s Code as necessary for consistency with the District’s water conservation program and water shortage contingency plan. She managed the tracking of water use per capita and water losses for monitoring and reporting, and ensured that AWWA Loss Water audit was conducted annually. During the 2012 to 2016 statewide drought, Rhodora’s team effectively used the District’s newly installed advanced metering infrastructure data to identify and focus on the highest water users to encourage reduction of water demands.

2020 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Pleasanton, CA: Rhodora was the Project Lead for the preparation of the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Plan preparation included integration of the results of the Zone 7 Water Agency (wholesale supplier) Tri-Valley Municipal and Industrial Water Demand Study, the City’s General Plan, and the Association of Bay Area Governments’ Regional Housing Needs Allocation, which were all in progress at the time. The plan required coordination with its wholesaler’s UWMP and compliance with Delta Plan Policy WR P1 on demonstration of reduced Delta Reliance. The development of the updated Water Shortage Contingency Plan was coordinated with the region’s wholesale agency and the other water retailers. Rhodora worked with City staff in updating its municipal code so that it is consistent with the revised Water Shortage Contingency Plan. The UWMP was adopted by the City Council and submitted to DWR on schedule.

2020 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Conservation Plan, City of Modesto and Modesto Irrigation District, Modesto, CA: Rhodora was the Project Engineer for the preparation of the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and the Project Lead for the preparation of its Water Conservation Plan. Rhodora was responsible for updating the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan for conformance with new legislative requirements and Water Conservation Plan. The UWMP was adopted by the District Board and submitted to DWR on schedule.

2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Mountain House Community Services District, Mountain House, CA: Rhodora was the Project Manager for the preparation of the District’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP). Plan preparation included integration of the Byron Bethany Irrigation District Agricultural Water Management Plan, District’s updates to its Water Master Plan and Emergency Water Supply Reliability Plan, and the Regional Housing Needs Allocation, which were all in progress at the time. The plan required compliance with Delta Plan Policy WR P1 on demonstration of reduced Delta Reliance and update to the District’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan. The UWMP was adopted by the District Board and submitted to DWR on schedule. As part of this effort, Rhodora also prepared the District’s first Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment.
137
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A 12

Ruby Lang

STAFF ENGINEER

Ruby Lang is a water resources engineer specializing in water system planning, drought resilience, and regulatory compliance. Ruby’s experience includes water demand forecasting, risk and resilience analysis, and capital improvement planning. She also has experience using ArcGIS and InfoWater. Ruby brings a strong technical background and a collaborative approach to help clients develop actionable, data driven strategies that enhance system reliability and long-term sustainability.

EXPERIENCE
2025 Urban Water Management Plan, City of Manteca, CA: Project Engineer for the preparation of a 2025 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for the City of Manteca. Tasks include coordination with City staff and internal project team to review available data and coordinate the development of UWMP sections. Developing water demand projections for the City, reviewing water supply availability and reliability, and updating the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan. The UWMP will be prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the Department of Water Resources Guidebook.

County of Marin Drought Resiliency Plan, County of Marin, CA: Project Engineer for the preparation of County of Marin’s Drought Resiliency Plan in conformance with the requirements of State Senate Bill 552 (Drought Planning for Small Water Suppliers and Rural Communities). The Plan assesses the varied impacts of historic droughts primarily in areas unserved by water agencies and their contractors (Study Area). The Plan will evaluate the Study Area’s drought vulnerability and develop short-term and long-term strategies to mitigate drought impacts. Preparation of the plan involves public and stakeholder outreach through the County Drought Task Force.

As the County’s initial Drought Resilience Plan, it will be prepared as a stand-alone plan and policy document to identify information gaps and outline future actions.

Modoc Drought Resilience Plan, Modoc County, CA: Project Engineer for the preparation of Modoc County’s Drought Resiliency Plan in conformance with the requirements of State Senate Bill 552 (Drought Planning for Small Water Suppliers and Rural Communities).

Responsible for analysis of water system risks, drought vulnerability, and the development of County’s initial Drought Resilience Plan.

Vancouver Comprehensive Water System Plan, City of Vancouver, WA: Project Engineer contributing to system evaluations, model calibration, and capital improvement recommendations. Tasks have included assisting with a full hydraulic model update build and calibration, the development of demand projections, supply analyses, pumping and storage analyses, and development of recommendations for capital improvements. Coordinated stakeholder plan reviews and complied with the Department of Health requirements. Supported project management tasks including deliverable tracking and client communication, lead workshops, client meetings, and subconsultant meetings.

Staff Title: Engineer II
Office Location: Medford, OR
Years of Experience: 5
Years with West Yost: 5
Education
 MS, Civil and Environmental
Engineering, California Polytechnic
State University, CA
 BS, Environmental Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University, CA
Professional Affiliations
 American Water Works Association
 American Society of Civil Engineers
Engineers Without Borders USA

138
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 A 13
Ruby Lang

2 Capital Improvement Planning Tool, City of Mountain House, CA: Technical Lead for the development and refinement of the City of Mountain House’s Capital Improvement Planning (CIP) tool. Built a complex workbook and the calculation framework, ensured QA/QC accuracy, and provided client training on tool use. Enhanced usability and consistency for infrastructure investment planning.
2018 America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA) Risk and Resilience Assessment (RRA) and Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Compliance Projects: Project Engineer for numerous all-hazards RRAs and ERPs in 2020 AWIA Plans and 2025 AWIA Plans. For each project, West Yost completed a thorough gap analysis after reviewing and organizing previously completed RRA and ERP-related resources. RRAs and ERPs were completed in accordance with American Water Works Association (AWWA) standards and best management practices. Each RRA considers natural, built, cyber and personal assets and all threats and hazards. Ruby conducted multiple seismic vulnerability studies to identify design earthquake and threat likelihood, soil shaking and displacement—liquefaction and landslide—impacts of the design earthquake relative to local geology and implemented those characteristics to linear and non-linear assets utilizing American Lifeline Alliance (ALA) and HAZUS methodologies to determine damage estimates and consequences to water facilities, as well as helped develop climate analysis approaches for new requirements in 2025 projects and assessments.

Water Master Plan, City of Albany, OR: Project Engineer for the Albany Water Master Plan (WMP) and assisted with the Resilience Plan and Pipeline Renewal and Replacement Plan of the WMP . This work has included a detailed condition assessment of Albany’s water facilities, which provided valuable information for strategic replacements and CIP work.

Jennings WWTP Water System, and Wellhead Treatment Planning and Design, Modesto, CA: Project Engineer assisting with distribution system planning and wellhead treatment planning for the City’s existing potable well. The City has an existing 25 gpm well that currently exceeds total dissolved solids standards. In addition, a nearby composting facility is requesting a connection to the City’s existing distribution system. The Study involved planning for a wellhead treatment system (water softening and Reverse Osmosis) as well as evaluating hydraulics for extending the water main to the composting facility. The project expanded from a study to design, currently at 90 percent design, which Ruby assisted in the development of plans, specifications, and cost estimating of the proposed project.

Water System Impact of General Plan Update, Atwater, CA: Project Engineer assisting with evaluating the impact that proposed land use changes to the City’s General Plan will have on the City’s existing water system. Study includes characterizing the City’s existing water system facilities, existing water demands, future projected water demands, and the associated supply, pump and storage facilities needed to support future demands while meeting all City-established criteria. 139
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 B1 Over 35 Years of Water System Planning Experience
West Yost brings the City of Lincoln a veteran team of water planners. In addition to direct experience preparing the City of Lincoln’s 2023 Water Master Plan Update (WMPU) West Yost team’s expertise ranges from large regional integrated water resources planning, distribution system modeling, master planning, supply reliability evaluations, water transfers, and specialized expertise in UWMPs. The table below details our recent relevant work:

Summary of West Yost’s Recent UWMP and Water System Planning Experience All of the 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMPs prepared by West Yost were deemed “Complete” by the Department of Water Resources (DWR), with no significant revisions or questions from DWR staff.

UWMP

WATER MASTER PLANNING

SUPPLY ANALYSIS

DEMAND ANALYSIS

CONSERVATION/ CLIMATE

GROUND WATER

SURFACE WATER

CONJUNCTIVE USE
City of Lincoln 2020 UWMP and Water Master Plan n n n n n City of Modesto 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMP, Engineer’s Report, and Water Master Plan n n n n n n n n City of Sacramento 2005, 201 5, and 2020 UWMP and Water Supply Master Plan n n n n n n n n City of Manteca 2020 UWMP n n n n n n n
City of Dixon 2020 UWMP and Water Master Plan n n n n n City of Stockton 2020 UWMP and 2008 and 202 1 Water Master Plans n n n n n n n n City of Ceres 2010 UWMP and 2025 Water Master Plan n n n n n n n City of Woodland 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMP and Water Focus Study n n n n n n n n City of Santa Rosa 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMP and Water Master Planning n n n n n n n n City of Napa 2020 UWMP and 2025 Water Master Plan n n n n n n City of San Bruno 2020, 201 5 UWMP and 2022-2025 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessments n n n n n n n n Coastside County Water District 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMP n n n n n n Project DescriptionsAPPENDIX B
140
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 B2
ƒ Our work on the City's 2025 WMPU, as well as on-going water system evaluations, provides us with an understanding of the City’s water system, its existing and future needs and the needed insight to address water supply concerns. ƒ We have proven experience in water resources engineering with more than 55 completed UWMPs over the past 20 years for a number of suppliers throughout California.
ƒ We know and understand DWR’s current and pending UWMP requirements, have excellent relationships with DWR staff, and can quickly get appointments made and questions answered.
ƒ We are closely tracking the potential changes expected in the 2025 UWMP requirements.

THE VALUE OF THE WEST YOST TEAM
The following projects highlight our team’s recent experience and demonstrate our ability to perform the work required for the City’s 2025 UWMP.

Project Objectives: For all of these projects, the objective was to prepare an Urban Water Management Plan to comply with CWC requirements and DWR guidelines, including documentation of demand and supply projections, compliance with SB X7-7 and SB 606/AB 1668, updates to demand management measures, and preparation of a Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

Project Outcomes: The outcome for all listed projects was that the UWMP met all State requirements and supported eligibility for future grant funding applications. In many cases, UWMPs were prepared concurrently with Water Master Plan updates, allowing updated demand information to be leveraged for consistency between planning documents. West Yost also supported the public hearing and City Council/Board of Directors adoption processes and submitted the final plans to DWR’s Water Use Efficiency data portal. ƒ Our team recently participated in DWR’s 2025 UWMP Submittal Table User Testing Program to assist in troubleshooting the required tables that are being developed for the 2025 UWMPs.

Project DescriptionsAPPENDIX B
2025 WATER MASTER PLAN UPDATE

CITY OF LINCOLN, CA
West Yost is working with the City of Lincoln to update its Water Master Plan. The Water Master Plan will provide the City with a comprehensive evaluation and long-term strategy to ensure the City’s water system can meet current and future demands. The Water Master Plan evaluates the existing water supply, distribution, and storage infrastructure, using the calibrated hydraulic model to assess system performance. It identifies near-term and long- range improvements needed to maintain reliable water service and support to planned growth within the City’s service area and Sphere of Influence.

TEAM: Brenda Estrada (Project Manager), Angie Yan, EIT (Project Engineer), Kelye McKinney (Principal-in-Charge), Elizabeth Drayer (QA/QC Reviewer) REFERENCE: Araceli Cazarez, Engineering Manager
( 9 16.434.2486 + [email protected] REFERENCE: (Same as 2020 UWMP) Araceli Cazarez, Engineering Manager ( 9 16.434.2486 + [email protected]
2020 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

CITY OF LINCOLN, CA
West Yost prepared the 2020 UWMP for the City of Lincoln. The UWMP provided information about the City’s water service area and population; water supply availability and reliability from the City’s water wholesaler and City groundwater wells; past, present, and projected water demands; the City’s water demand management measures; a City water shortage contingency plan; and documented compliance with SB X7-7. The UWMP was prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Water Code and the DWR UWMP Guidebook and was submitted to DWR on schedule.

TEAM: Brenda Estrada (Project Manager), Rhodora Biagtan (Water Shortage Contingency Plan), Elizabeth Drayer (QA/QC Reviewer /Principal-in-Charge) Direct Project Experience with the City of Lincoln
141
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 B3
Project DescriptionsAPPENDIX B
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (2020)

CITY OF DIXON, CA
West Yost prepared the City of Dixon (City's) 2020 Urban Water Management Plan when the City reached classification as an urban water supplier. This plan was the City’s first UWMP and required coordination with the City’s new General Plan and pending Solano County Multi-Jurisdiction Hazard Mitigation Plan. It also required the preparation of the City’s first Water Shortage Contingency Plan and Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment.

The 2020 UWMP was prepared while overlapping with West Yost’s completion of the City’s 202 1 Water System Master Plan Update. West Yost incorporated updated water demand projections and groundwater supply capacity from the Water System Master Plan into the 2020 UWMP to maintain consistency across documents.

West Yost worked collaboratively with City Staff to orient them to new reporting requirements as they became recognized as an urban water supplier. The UWMP was adopted by the City Council and submitted to DWR on schedule.

REFERENCE: Josh Hudson, Water Operations Supervisor, Public Works Department ( 707.678.7000 + [email protected]
TEAM: Rhodora Biagtan (Project Manager), Elizabeth Drayer (Principal-in-Charge) Angie Yan, EIT (Staff Engineer)
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (2005, 201 5, AND 2020) AND

WATER SUPPLY MASTER PLAN

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CA
Additional Project Experience
West Yost prepared the 2005, 201 5, and 2020 updates to the City of Sacramento’s UWMP. The UWMPs provided information about the City’s water service area and population; available water supply sources and associated reliability; past, present, and projected water demands; the City’s water demand management measures; a City water shortage contingency plan; and potential for use of recycled water within the City’s water service area.

West Yost team members also prepared the City of Sacramento’s 201 3 Water Supply Master Plan. This project included determining demand allocations by land use and identifying demand offsets with a focus on conservation. Supply management planning focused on reliability and sustainability, including water supply portfolio planning that optimizes surface water, groundwater, and recycled water. The project included close coordination with stakeholders, including a 20-member Advisory Board that represented a variety of interests in the region - from other water purveyors and suppliers to environmental groups. West Yost is currently preparing an update to the City’s 201 3 Water Master Plan.

REFERENCE: Brett Ewart, PE Senior Engineer
(9 16.808. 1 725 [email protected] TEAM: Elizabeth Drayer (Principal-in-Charge), Brenda Estrada, PE (QA/QC) 142
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 B4
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (2010, 201 5, AND 2020)

CITY OF MODESTO, CA
West Yost prepared the City of Modesto’s (City’s) 2010 and 201 5 UWMPs. West Yost’s approach to preparing the City’s UWMPs included addressing the critical issues regarding future service area population, complying with the requirements of SB X7-7 , and identifying water supply needs.

West Yost carefully assessed the service area population relative to both the contiguous and outlying service areas, projected population at buildout of the General Plan, and potential expansion of the northern Sphere of Influence boundary. These issues were incorporated into the engineering analysis to identify impacts on the quantity and timing of potable and non-potable water supplies that will ultimately be required to meet these new customer demands, and impact infrastructure sizing and placement.

This project also included analysis and planning for water conservation and other demand management measures, as well as the potential for additional supply options, such as groundwater pumping, a seasonal and/or long-term local groundwater ASR banking program, groundwater and/or recycled water offset of existing potable demands, and/or new treated surface water supplies.

To coordinate efforts and address common components for the City’s overall water system, the City’s 2010 UWMP was prepared as a joint plan with the Modesto Irrigation District (MID), the wholesale water agency from which the City purchases treated surface water supplies. Thus, the plan was developed to meet all wholesale and retail requirements.

Although the City’s 201 5 UWMP was not prepared jointly, the 2020 UWMP is proposed to be a jointly prepared plan by the City and MID. West Yost was also selected to prepare the City/MID Joint 2020 UWMP.

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (2005, 2010, 201 5, AND 2020)

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, CA
West Yost helped the City of Santa Rosa prepare 2005, 2010, 201 5, and 2020 UWMPs.

West Yost identified the City’s existing water supply sources, including an evaluation of reliability and vulnerability to drought conditions, and evaluated current and projected water demands. West Yost also assessed water supply reliability in normal years, single dry years, and multiple dry years for 25 years. West Yost reviewed previously prepared documents that authenticate the City’s implementation of Demand Management Measures and documents that describe the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan.

Project DescriptionsAPPENDIX B
URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (2005, 2010, 201 5, AND 2020) (CONTINUED)

CITY OF SANTA ROSA, CA
West Yost described the City’s water recycling facilities and programs. West Yost developed technical data to establish the City’s “baseline” gallons per capita per day in compliance with SBx7-7 methodologies and a Water Shortage Allocation Methodology, which considered both demand hardening and other conservation investments.

West Yost is also prepared the City’s 2020 UWMP and worked with the City to address legislation for additional water use efficiency as well as other updates to the UWMP requirements.

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (201 5, 2025)

CITY OF SAN BRUNO, CA
West Yost prepared the City of San Bruno’s 201 5 UWMP. Tasks included the review of water demand projections, water supply availability and reliability from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and the City’s local groundwater supplies, SB X7-7 compliance, demand management measures, and the City’s water shortage contingency plan. West Yost prepared and presented an overview of the UWMP to City Council and the public at a public hearing. West Yost also prepared the City of San Bruno’s 201 2 Water System Master Plan and is currently preparing a 2025 update.

URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLANS (2005, 2010, AND 201 5)

WATER AND SEWER MASTER PLANS

DUBLIN SAN RAMON SERVICES DISTRICT, DUBLIN, CA
West Yost has been providing water planning and design services to the DSRSD for over 20 years. This includes preparation of the District’s 2005, 2010 and 201 5 UWMPs and recent Water and Sewer Master Plan updates. The Water Master Plan included a comprehensive hydraulic model update that was used to size transmission and distribution pipelines, pump stations and reservoirs. It provided analysis of the system’s ability to meet minimum pressure and flows during a maximum day plus fire flow and peak hour demand periods.

West Yost also developed an interactive spreadsheet tool to allow the District to track and update new development projects within their water service area and their projected water demands and link that directly to the demand allocation used in the hydraulic model. West Yost trained District staff on the use of the tool, which will allow the District staff to efficiently update its hydraulic model as proposed development projects evolve.

Additional Experience
143
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 C1
Preliminary Data Request TableAPPENDIX C
Below is a sample of a preliminary data request. As a result of our ongoing work with the City, West Yost has a number of these items already on file, and as such we can save the City time. The items West Yost already have on-file are outlined in light blue.

We can leverage data that has been submitted on current projects with the City to maximize efficiency and help save time for City staff.

Description Source Date Requested Date Received
Confirm Use of
WMPU Data Comments
1 Introduction
a General discussion of water management planning efforts--plan preparation, coordination and adoption West Yost - - -
2 Plan Preparation
a Number of Services and Volume of Water Supplied in 2025 City - To be provided after January 1, 2026. Should be consistent with what will be included in the City's 2025 Electronic Annual Report due April 1, 2026.
b Is City participating in Regional Planning or Compliance? City - 2020 - Individual. Any changes? c Fiscal Year or Calendar Year? City - 2020 - Calendar Year. Any changes? d List of Agencies for coordination and outreach City - Any changes from 2020? (California American Water District, City of Roseville, NID, PCWA, Place County Public Works, SACG, South Sutter Water District) e Retailer/Supplier Information Exchange City - Any changes from 2020? (PCWA and NID) f Notification to Cities and Counties City - West Yost to provide sample for City to complete. 3 System Description
a Service Area Climate West Yost - - -
b Electronic copy (GIS or AutoCAD) of Service Area Boundary and Planning Area Boundary City/West Yost - - West Yost has recent City Limits and sphere of influence used in the Water Master Plan Update (WMPU). If there have been changes, please provide an updated boundary. c Existing Service Area Population and Demographics (Single Family/Multi-Family, People per connection SF/MF) City/West Yost - 2020 UWMP used population from the California Department of Finance and demographics from the United States Census Bureau. West Yost can use the same sources unless the City has alternate information to include.
d Projected Service Area Population through 2050 (5-year increments) City - 2020 UWMP used population projections from the City's Community Development Department and assume an average household size of 2.67 people. Please provide direction on projected populations to be used in the 2025 UWMP.
e Water System Facilities Map--Electronic copy (GIS or AutoCAD) West Yost - - Included in 2020 UWMP, but optional. If City would like to include in 2025 UWMP, West Yost has updated figure from WMPU.
f Seismic risk assessment of water facilities City -
2020 UWMP referenced the Placer County 2016 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. The plan is currently being updated for 2026. Are there any additional seismic evaluations that should be considered? Was seismic risk assessed as part of the City's AWIA Risk and Resilience Assessment? g Local Hazard Mitigation Plan City - Placer County's LHMP is currently being updated for 2026. Planned adoption in August 2026. West Yost will reference the 2016 LMHP for 2025 UWMP.
h Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment or other statement of climate change impacts City - 2020 UWMP referenced the 207 North American Basin Regional Drought Contingency Plan. Is there any other information that should be referenced? i Projected Land Uses City/West Yost - - West Yost will use projected land use developed for the WMPU; please provide updated information if there have been changes since then.
j General System Description - Miles of pipeline City - Please provide approximate miles of pipelines within the City's water system, if any changes from what was reported in the most recent Water Loss Audit.
4 System Water Use
a Historical water use/demand and number of connections by water use sector (2024) City/West Yost - West Yost has data for 2021 to 2023 from the WMPU. City to provide 2024 data. b 2025 actual retail demands and number of connections for potable and raw water by water use sector City - To be provided after January 1, 2026. c Projected water use/demand by water use sector (2030 through 2050) City/West Yost Updated projections are included in the WMPU through 2045 using updated water demand factors developed using 2023 metered consumption data; are these the projections that should be used in the 2025 UWMP? Please also provide direction on how you would like to project demands for 2050.

WMPU projected up to buildout.
d Estimate of water savings from water conservation program City - 2020 UWMP did not include conservation as part of projections. Does the City want to estimate these separately? This is not required. West Yost recommends not including to be conservative. f AWWA Water Loss Audits for 2020 through 2024 City - West Yost has received Water Loss Audits for 2020 to 2023 for the WMPU; however, City's 2024 water audit has not yet been submitted. Please provide when complete.

Chapter
City of Lincoln 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Data Request Status Table - Last Updated: October 13, 2025 N-C-265-60-25-15-ENGR
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Last Revised: 6-18-2025
144
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 C2
Description Source Date Requested Date Received
Confirm Use of
WMPU Data CommentsChapter
City of Lincoln 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Data Request Status Table - Last Updated: October 13, 2025 g Report on compliance with distribution water loss standards West Yost - - - West Yost will reference the Water Loss Standards as posted by DWR in July 2025. h Disadvantaged Communities Map West Yost - - - West Yost to reference statewide mapping. i Dwelling units and water use estimates 2020 and projections to 2045 for lower income households West Yost - - - West Yost will reference the most recently adopted Housing Element for demographics. j Discussion regarding impacts of climate change on demands City - - - See data request in Section 3 5 Baselines and Targets
a System annexations City - - - No recent annexations during development of WMPU. 6 System Supplies
a Annual water supply production by source (2021-2025) City - West Yost has production for 2021 to 2023. 2025 information to be provided after January 1, 2026. b Any groundwater recharge? City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? c Status update on Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) compliance activities City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? d Changes to projected water supply sources through 2045 from 2020 UWMP, new projection for 2050 City/West Yost - - West Yost projected groundwater and surface water supplies in the WMPU (2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, 2050). Will use WMPU supply projections unless otherwise directed. e Are there any existing or planned beneficial uses of stormwater detention and use? (e.g., for irrigation) City - Any changes from 2020 UWMP? f Wastewater flows, treatment, disposal, and recycled water use (inside services area and outside service area) in 2025 City - To be provided after January 1, 2026. g Recycled water use by type, place, and quantity for 2025 City - To be provided after January 1, 2026. h Projected beneficial use of recycled water through 2050 by type City - Review 2020 UWMP Table 6-6 and provide any changes in projected uses. i Changes to proposed actions to encourage recycled water use City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? j Changes to transfers/exchanges/interties since 2020 UWMP City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? k Changes to expected future water supply projects or programs City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? l Long term water alternative water supplies considered by City? City/West Yost - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? m
Energy Intensity (2025)
- Total energy (kWh) consumed for water storage, conveyance, treatment, and/or distribution
- Total energy (KWh) consumed for wastewater collection, treatment, and discharge
City - To be provided after January 1, 2026.
n Climate change impacts to water supply. City - Refer to Section 3 7 Water Supply Reliability Assessment
a Water Year Type (Average Year, Single Dry Year, Consecutive 5 dry years) City - Are there any changes to the assumed base years in the 2020 UWMP? b Volume available for each water year type City -
c Changes to water supply reliability or factors affecting supply reliability since 2020 UWMP City - - Will include discussion from WMPU. Are there any updates? 8 Water Shortage Contingency Plan
a Changes to the WSCP since 2020 UWMP City - Is there anything to adjust based on the most recent drought? Are identified decision makers still correct?
b Restrictions and Prohibitions on End Uses; Penalties Charges and Enforcement Prohibitions City - Changes since 2020 UWMP? c Consumption Reduction Methods by Stage City - Changes since 2020 UWMP? d Water shortage reductions; budget impacts; resolution/ordinance City - Changes since 2020 UWMP? e Catastrophic Supply Interruption City - Changes since 2020 UWMP? N-C-265-60-25-15-ENGR
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Last Revised: 6-18-2025
Preliminary Data Request TableAPPENDIX C
145
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 C3
Description Source Date Requested Date Received
Confirm Use of
WMPU Data CommentsChapter
City of Lincoln 2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Data Request Status Table - Last Updated: October 13, 2025 9 Demand Management Measures
a
Narrative of six DMMs (water waste prevention ordinance, metering, conservation pricing, public education and outreach, programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss, water conservation program coordination and staffing support, other DMMS that significantly impact water demand)
City/West Yost -
b Residential Conservation Programs City/West Yost -
c Large landscape irrigation conservation programs City/West Yost - d Commercial, Industrial, Institutional Customers Conservation Program City/West Yost - 10 Plan Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation
a Notification to Cities and Counties See Appendices
A Appendices (based on 2020 UWMP)
a Legislative Requirements West Yost - - -
b DWR Tables West Yost - - -
c DWR UWMP Checklist West Yost - - -
d Agency and Public Notices City - West Yost to provide samples as timing nears. e General Plan Land Use West Yost - - From WMPU.
f Land Use Projection West Yost - - From WMPU.
g Distribution System Water Loss Audits, 2020 to 2024 City/West Yost - West Yost has received Water Loss Audits for 2020 to 2023 for the WMPU; however, City's 2024 water audit has not yet been submitted. Please provide when complete. h SB x7-7 Verification and Compliance forms West Yost - - - From 2020 UWMP. i Water Supply Agreements West Yost - - - From WMPU.
j Water Shortage Contingency Plan West Yost - - - From 2020 UWMP. k Municipal Code Sections West Yost - - -
l Water Rate Structure West Yost - - -
m Water Conservation Outreach City - Optional not included in 2020 UWMP. Provide any updated outreach materials and documentation of demand management measures.
n UWMP Adoption Resolutions City - City to provide upon adoption of 2025 UWMP in 2026.

West Yost to prepare Draft Chapter 9 and provide to City to incorporate updated numbers and practices.

N-C-265-60-25-15-ENGR
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
Last Revised: 6-18-2025
Preliminary Data Request TableAPPENDIX C
146
City of Lincoln | 2025 Urban Water Management Plan | October 23, 2025 C4
Levine Act Statement FormFORMS
Levine Act Disclosure Statement
(The completed form submitted to the City of Lincoln is a public record.) California Government Code Section 84308 (the "Levine Act") prohibits any officer of the City of Lincoln (defined as an elected or appointed officer, alternate, and any candidate for elected office) from participating in any consideration or action related to a proceeding if they receive political contribution(s) from a party or its agent(s) totaling more than $500 within the previous 12 months, while a proceeding is pending, and for 12 months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding concerning a license, permit, other entitlement for use, franchise, or contract (collectively, “proposal or application”).

City officers are listed here:
• Members of the City Council: https://www.lincolnca.gov/en/our-government/council.aspx • Boards and Commission Members: https://www.lincolnca.gov/en/our-government/boards-commissions-and- committees.aspx
Parties and their agent(s) are responsible for reviewing and disclosing their applicable contributions to City officers on the record of a proceeding.

1. Have you or your entity, or any agent on behalf of you or your entity, made any political contributions totaling more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any action of any City Council, Board o r Commission consideration or action related to this proposal or application?
� YES If yes, please identify the City officer(s):
� NO

2. Do you or your entity, or any agent on behalf of you or your company, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution(s) of more than $500 to any City officer in the 12 months following any City Council, Board or Commission consideration or action related to this proposal or application? � YES If yes, please identify the City officer(s):
� NO
Answering ‘yes’ to either of the two questions above does not preclude the City of Lincoln from considering or taking action on a proposal or application. It does, however, potentially preclude the identified officer(s) from participating in consideration of and taking any action related to the proposal or application.

I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of California the foregoing information is true and correct.

Dated: Name of entity:

By:
(signature)
(print name and title)
You must submit a supplemental form if you make any new reportable contribution(s) while the proposal or application is being considered and is pending. If this form has not been previously submitted in connection with a contracting, licensing, entitlement or permitting process, please provide the completed form to the Office of the City Clerk for appropriate departmental routing at: City Clerk, City Hall, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, CA 95648, [email protected]. 10/22/2025 West Yost Associates
/uni2714
/uni2714
Kelye McKinney, PE, Principal-in-Charge
147

WE SUPPORT OUR COMMUNITIES

WE ARE WATER FOCUSED

WE TAKE PRIDE IN WHAT WE DO

WE STRIVE TO BECOME OUR BEST
WE DO WHAT’S RIGHT

WE BELIEVE IN QUALITY

WE LISTEN

WE SOLVE CHALLENGING PROBLEMS

WE SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE

WE TAKE OWNERSHIP

WE COLLABORATE

WE HAVE FUN

WE ARE WEST YOST
148
SUBJECT:

Workshop to Discuss Potential Regulation of Tobacco and Vape Products in Lincoln. (Kristine Mollenkopf)
SUBMITTED BY:

Kristi McKenney
DEPARTMENT:

City Attorney's Office
DATE:

November 18, 2025

Item Number 16.A

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff seeks direction from the City Council regarding whether or how they wish to regulate tobacco retailers, including vape shops.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

In 2019, a new vape shop opened in a very prominent location in downtown Lincoln, approximately ½ mile from Lincoln High School. Council members at that time raised concerns regarding its location so close to a school. The City’s current Municipal Code does not generally regulate establishments that sell tobacco products. The Municipal Code only requires the retailer to be located in a proper zone, obtain a conditional use permit that requires state licensing, and a general Lincoln business license.

In 2019, the City of Lincoln had 22 retailers selling tobacco and/or vape products. Currently, in 2025, the City of Lincoln has 24 retailers selling tobacco and/or vape products. A few of the retailers are specialty shops, meaning that they only sell tobacco or vape related products.

However, several of the retailers, such as gas stations or convenience stores, sell multiple types of products in addition to tobacco and vape products. The allocation of retailers is shown on the table below:

Type of Retailer
Number of These Retailers w/in Lincoln
Grocery stores/Markets
6 Pharmacies
1 Gas Stations/Mini-Marts
8 Liquor Stores
1 Country Club/Golf Club
2 STAFF REPORT
149
Tobacco/Smoke Shops
6 Recently, Councilmembers have raised concerns again about the number of tobacco and vape locations within Lincoln as well as their proximity to schools or to one another and requested suggest options for how to regulate these uses.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Health Impacts from Vaping

Vaping is the act of inhaling and exhaling an aerosol, often referred to as vapor, which is produced by an e-cigarette or similar device
[1]
. The term is used because e-cigarettes do not
produce tobacco smoke, but rather an aerosol, often mistaken for water vapor, that consists of fine particles. Many of these particles contain varying amounts of toxic chemicals, which have been linked to cancer, as well as respiratory and heart disease.

Vaping has grown in popularity with the rise of e-cigarettes, which were introduced to the mass market in the U.S. in 2007. Vaping devices include not just e-cigarettes, but also vape pens and advanced personal vaporizers, also known as MODS. E-cigarettes, which resemble smoked cigarettes, and vape pens, which resemble large fountain pens, are typically simpler in design and less expensive than devices that have been customized by the user.

Generally, a vaping device consists of a mouthpiece, a battery, a cartridge for containing the e-liquid or e-juice, and a heating element. When the device is used, the battery heats up the heating element, turning the e-liquid into an aerosol that is inhaled into the lungs and then exhaled.

The e-liquid in vaporizer products usually contains a propylene glycol or vegetable glycerin- based liquid with nicotine, flavoring and other chemicals and metals, but not tobacco. Some these devices to vape THC, the chemical responsible for most of marijuana's mind-altering effects, or even synthetic drugs like flakka (essentially bath salts), instead of nicotine.

The most popular vaping product is the JUUL, which is a small, sleek device that resembles a computer USB flash drive. Its design makes it easy to hide, which helps explain why it has become so popular among middle and high school students. In 2018, it accounted for 150
approximately 72% of the market share of vaping products in the United States. It comes in many flavors like crème Brulé, mango and fruit medley. Every JUUL product contains a high dose of nicotine: one pod or flavor cartridge contains about the same amount of nicotine as a whole pack of cigarettes.

A growing body of evidence indicates that vaping products may be a health hazard. Despite early optimism when these products first came on the market in the late 2000’s, health advocates now recommend caution in using them considering growing evidence suggesting that their risks, especially to young people, outweigh their benefits.

In August of 2020, Senate Bill 793 was passed which aimed to halt the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including e-liquids, menthol cigarettes, and flavored smokeless tobacco.

The bill was a response to growing concerns over the rising rates of nicotine addiction among young people. The implementation was delayed by a referendum funded by the tobacco industry which placed the fate of the flavored tobacco ban in the hands of California voters as Proposition 31 in November 2022. A majority of voters voted in favor of the ban making it no longer legally permitted for tobacco retailers to sell these items.

Since 2022, Assembly Bill 935, Senate Bill 1230, and Assembly Bill 3218 have expanded the initial law and closed a few loopholes. These bans include a wide range of products with a “characterizing flavor” other than tobacco which encompasses fruit, candy, mint, and menthol flavors, and applies to all vaping cartridges, pods, and e-liquids containing nicotine or not.

These new laws went into effect on January 1, 2025.

The City of Lincoln presently has 6 self-designated vape shops, and a total of 24 licensed California cigarette and tobacco products retailers. Without performing a complete audit of all the retailers, it is not known whether the other 18 shops sell vape products in addition to more traditional tobacco products.

The City of Lincoln may regulate the sale of tobacco products as part of its broad police power, to protect the health, safety and general welfare of its residents. (Cal. Const. article XI, § 7;
Carlin v. City of Palm Springs
(1971) 14 Cal.App.3d 706, 711.) If the City Council elects to regulate tobacco retailers, there are several options available.

Example Regulatory Models:

The Rocklin regulatory model
:
151

Rocklin prohibits tobacco retailers within one thousand feet of any developed or designated public, private or charter school providing primary or secondary education, or within one thousand feet of any preexisting tobacco retailer. (The Rocklin ordinance is Attachment A.) The ordinance further sunsets pre-existing grandfathered tobacco retailers if the use is abandoned for a period of ninety continuous days, whether or not there was the intent to abandon the use. The ordinance also prohibits pre-existing uses from being enlarged, expanded, or extended.

This model of ordinance would be relatively simple for staff to implement. It would require analysis at the point of the business license application, and more routine monitoring to ensure uses were not expanded.

The Sacramento regulatory model
:

The City of Sacramento enacted a complete ban on the sale of flavored e-cigarette cartridges, menthol cigarettes and other flavored tobacco products, effective October 1, 2019. The Sacramento staff report and ordinance are Attachment B.

The ordinance does not require any of Sacramento’s roughly 383 tobacco retailers to close.

The City will, however, close shops that increase their inventory of flavored tobacco products, stop selling tobacco products for more than 60 days, or fail to renew their licenses. If the City closes shops for those reasons, those licenses will not be issued to new shops. No new tobacco retailers are allowed to open within 1,000 feet of another one.

Retailers complained that their inability to sell these products would be financially devastating to their businesses, and several have closed in the face of the ordinance change.

This model too would be relatively simple for staff to implement. It would require analysis at the point of the business license application, and more routine monitoring to ensure uses were not expanded.

The San Francisco regulatory model

The County of San Francisco’s ordinance, a copy of which is Attachment C, bans all new 152
tobacco products until and unless the product obtains a premarket review order by the federal Food and Drug Administration. If a retailer sells unapproved tobacco products in violation of the ordinance, the retailer’s tobacco sales permit may be revoked. The ordinance also prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco products.

Administering this type of ordinance in Lincoln would present some obstacles. City staff are not trained and educated to monitor federal FDA compliance. Monitoring the products sold by Lincoln’s 25 retailers would require periodic inspections. Violations resulting in revocation of a retail tobacco sales permit would require an administrative process in which the State would need to be a willing partner.

Other Regulatory Considerations:

Possession of tobacco products by persons under the age of 21

At the State level, Business & Professions Code § 22950, et seq., the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, prohibits a person from selling or otherwise furnishing tobacco products to a person under 21 years of age. Existing law authorizes specified enforcing agencies to assess civil penalties for violations of the STAKE Act. While selling tobacco to a person who is under-age is illegal activity by the seller, it is not illegal for someone under the age of 21 to possess tobacco products. Based upon information provided by the Lincoln Police Department, a Municipal Code ordinance making possession of tobacco products by persons under the age of 21 an infraction or misdemeanor, subject to a fine, would give the Police Department and School Resource Officers another tool for enforcement. Possession under the age of 18 could result in juvenile court involvement.

Enactment of an ordinance banning possession of tobacco products by persons under the age of 21 will necessarily involve coordination between law enforcement issuing citations, and the City Attorney’s Office in the prosecution and/or resolution of the citations, which could include financial penalties, education courses, or community service requirements in exchange for a dismissal.

Sale of non-Tobacco or Vape Items

Nitrous Oxide

153
The Lincoln Police department has suggested the City Attorney’s office include the prohibition of tobacco and vape shops selling items that are not specifically related to tobacco or vaping but rather, are generally known to law enforcement to be used for other types of illegal drug activities. Items such as disposable glass pipes or nitrous oxide, commonly referred to as whippets, are sometimes sold in tobacco or vape shops. Nitrous oxide is used as a sedative and anesthetic for dental or surgical procedures, or as a charger for whipped cream dispensers. Nitrous oxide can also be inhaled and used as an illegal drug.

Kratom and 7-OH

Other items to consider prohibiting are kratom and its active alkaloid 7-hydroxymitragynine (7- OH). Although kratom is derived from a tropical tree native to Southeast Asia and has traditionally been used for its stimulant and pain-relieving effects, U.S. regulators emphasize that neither kratom nor any of its alkaloids are approved for medical or dietary use.

The FDA reports growing evidence that kratom can produce opioid-like effects, including euphoria, respiratory depression, physical dependence, and withdrawal symptoms. The agency notes that the alkaloid 7-OH, though present only in small quantities in natural leaf material, is far more potent at the mu-opioid receptor than mitragynine, kratom’s primary compound. This potency raises particular concern when 7-OH is either concentrated during processing or added synthetically to commercial products. The FDA has issued multiple warnings and enforcement actions against companies marketing kratom- or 7-OH-containing drinks, powders, and gummies, stating that these products may cause sedation, respiratory failure, seizures, and death.

Several case reports and toxicological reviews submitted to the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) describe hospitalizations and fatalities in which kratom or 7-OH was detected. In these cases, users presented with symptoms consistent with opioid toxicity, such as slowed breathing, loss of consciousness, and cardiac arrest. Although some deaths involved co-use with other substances, the FDA maintains that kratom itself poses sufficient toxicological risk to warrant regulatory restriction. Animal and in vitro studies confirm that mitragynine is converted in the body to 7-OH, which has significantly higher opioid receptor activity, suggesting that even natural kratom can lead to opioid-type adverse effects in certain doses or formulations.

At the state level, the CDPH released an advisory in October 2025 declaring foods, dietary supplements, and medical products containing kratom or 7-OH to be “dangerous and illegal to sell or manufacture” in California. This action followed six fatal overdoses in Los Angeles County linked specifically to products containing 7-OH. The CDPH emphasized that ingestion of kratom or 7-OH can cause addiction, psychosis, seizures, and potentially fatal respiratory depression. California authorities have begun removing these items from retail shelves and 154
caution that even so-called herbal kratom drinks and gummies may contain undisclosed or unsafe concentrations of 7-OH.

Both the FDA and CDPH have underscored the particular risk to minors. Kratom products are frequently sold in convenience stores and gas stations in packaging that resembles energy drinks or candy, often without age restrictions. Health officials warn that adolescents who experiment with kratom may develop physical dependence or experience overdose, especially if they consume products adulterated with 7-OH or combine kratom with alcohol or other drugs. Because 7-OH acts on the same receptors as opioids, repeated exposure can alter adolescent brain development and increase vulnerability to substance use disorders later in life. Law enforcement agencies in several California counties have also reported seizures of kratom products from minors and unlicensed retailers, prompting calls for stronger age-related controls and public education campaigns.

From a public health standpoint, both federal and state agencies view kratom and 7-OH as unregulated psychoactive substances with unpredictable pharmacology and significant potential for harm, particularly among youth and unknowing consumers. The absence of manufacturing standards and the variability in alkaloid concentrations among products mean that users cannot reliably gauge potency or toxicity. For these reasons, the FDA continues to recommend that consumers avoid all kratom-containing products, and the CDPH has moved to classify such products as illegal within California.

Children’s Toys and Stuffed Animals, etc

Children’s toys and stuffed animals should be prohibited from sale, display, or distribution within smoke and vape shops because their presence undermines youth protection policies and creates an implicit appeal to minors. These establishments sell products containing nicotine, cannabis, or other psychoactive substances that are legally restricted to adults.

Displaying toys or child-themed items in these environments blurs the boundary between adult-only businesses and spaces meant for children, normalizing or glamorizing the use of restricted substances.

During a recent local inspection conducted by regional law enforcement and LPD officers, multiple smoke and vape shop locations were observed displaying both large and small stuffed animals throughout the premises. Some were sealed in original retail packaging, while others were unpackaged and openly displayed near counters or product shelves, positioned as items for sale or decorative features. These findings indicated that the stores were marketing or presenting child-associated merchandise within environments dedicated to adult- only products, in direct conflict with the intent of youth access prevention regulations. The presence of these items within such establishments demonstrates a tangible example of how youth-oriented goods can appear in inappropriate retail contexts and highlights the need for an 155
explicit prohibition in local code to prevent recurrence.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that certain e-cigarette products and accessories have been designed or marketed to resemble toys, action figures, or school supplies, intentionally appealing to youth and increasing underage interest in nicotine products. Similarly, a 2025 public health assessment in Transylvania County, North Carolina, documented smoke and vape shops displaying youth-targeted marketing elements such as cartoons, candy imagery, and toy-like merchandise within adult retail spaces. These patterns illustrate that the incorporation of toy-related imagery and products in tobacco or vape retail settings is not incidental but reflects broader marketing and aesthetic practices that can influence minors.

From a public health standpoint, prohibiting children’s toys or stuffed animals in smoke and vape shops is consistent with federal and state strategies to reduce youth exposure to nicotine and tobacco marketing. Studies from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Surgeon General show that adolescents are highly responsive to environmental cues and branding that associate adult behaviors with youthful or playful imagery. Removing such visual triggers from adult-only businesses helps prevent inadvertent youth targeting, aligns with advertising and zoning restrictions, and reinforces community norms that protect minors from early exposure to addictive substances.

Adding this prohibition to a municipal code would establish a clear and enforceable standard.

It would ensure that retailers of adult products maintain an environment consistent with youth protection goals, provide a legal mechanism for enforcement during inspections, and support broader community and public health objectives to reduce underage nicotine initiation and exposure.

Concealed Compartments

Hidden compartments or secret rooms in retail establishments that sell tobacco, vaping, or adult products create serious public safety and regulatory risks. These structural modifications allow restricted products, such as illicit tobacco, unlicensed cannabis items, flavored nicotine or vape cartridges, and gambling devices, to be stored or sold out of sight of inspectors and the public. This undermines transparency, weakens age-verification safeguards, increases youth access, and hampers enforcement efforts. Including a prohibition against hidden compartments in a municipal code ensures that retail spaces are fully visible, supports inspections, reduces illicit activity, protects minors, and reinforces public health and safety standards.

156
Requirement for Glass Displays and Shelving

To enhance regulatory oversight, public safety, and accountability, smoke and vape shops should be required to use transparent glass displays and open shelving for all products. This ensures that all merchandise is fully visible to inspectors and the public, preventing the concealment of restricted or illegal items behind other products, a practice observed during multiple recent inspections.

Requiring glass displays and open shelving improves inspection efficiency by allowing regulators to quickly verify inventory and ensures that no products can be surreptitiously hidden. It also increases accountability for store owners, reduces opportunities for illicit sales, and reinforces youth protection measures by making age-restricted products clearly visible and easily monitored.

City-Specific Tobacco License

Of the many city ordinances reviewed in preparation for this workshop, the majority of cities regulating tobacco required a city-specific tobacco license. Regardless of whether the City of Lincoln requires a city-specific tobacco license, the City would still be able to do an early implementation of the tobacco and vape regulations to ensure compliance when a new retailer applies for a general business license by flagging the application and checking it for compliance before issuing the business license.

Location of Tobacco and Vape Shops

One regulatory tool implemented in many jurisdictions is restricting the distance between a tobacco or vape shop and sensitive uses. For example, Rocklin currently has a requirement that no tobacco or vape shops are permitted within 1000 feet of a school.

Prohibition of Tobacco or Vape Sales within Specific Types of Businesses

Of the cities who have ordinances regulating tobacco or vape shops, many of them have prohibitions for certain types of retailers selling tobacco products. The most common prohibition is in pharmacies. In Lincoln, only one pharmacy is currently selling tobacco 157
products, so this regulation would not have a significant impact.

A method for how to wind up the tobacco sales from businesses that are currently selling tobacco products which would no longer be allowed if an ordinance is passed is a Compliance Date with a sell-down period. For this option, the ordinance would state a final date by which the businesses must stop selling tobacco products. This date would generally be 90-180 days after the ordinance goes into effect. This allows the business to sell its remaining tobacco inventory so there is no financial loss. Once the compliance date passes, the City can inspect the businesses and issue fines until compliance is obtained. Again, this poses some administrative challenges.

Regulation Roll-Out Options:

If Council gives this direction, there are several options for “sunsetting” nonconforming businesses if they are found to be currently doing business within an area deemed a “sensitive use”. A “sensitive use” area generally includes K-12 schools, but could also include parks or playgrounds depending on Council’s direction. Some options to consider are as follows.

Amortization Period
This method would allow businesses operating within a sensitive use zone to continue to operate for a specific period, after which it must cease operations or relocate. The core legal requirement for this approach is that the amortization period be reasonable. “Reasonableness” is determined by several factors including each business’s capital investment, remaining lease term, investment in improvements, the nature of the business, and any offered public benefit.

Amortization could be done on a fixed schedule or a variable schedule. A variable schedule is determined on a case-by-case basis and is likely more legally sound, but may be challenging to implement.

Grandfather Clause
This method would “grandfather in” existing businesses, allowing them to operate indefinitely, but with strict limitations designed to phase them out over time. The business would be a “legal nonconforming use” but could continue as long as the use remains unchanged. Some items which could be included in the clause could include; no expansion or alteration (prohibiting expansion or alteration of business), discontinuation (status is lost if business ceases operation for a continuous period), destruction (if the business property is destroyed there is no right to re-establish), or change of ownership (nonconforming use terminates upon the sale or transfer of business to a new owner).
158

Voluntary or Incentivized Program
This method inspires voluntary compliance by using incentives to encourage compliance.

Some options for this would be; voluntary buyouts, relocation assistance such as grants or low interest loans to help businesses cover the cost of moving to a new location, or fee waivers on items such as planning, permits, or other administrative fees.

[1]
All information regarding vaping was derived from research presented by Linda Richter, Ph.D., Director of Policy Research and Analysis, Center on Addiction, 2018. Other resources include:
1 .

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA and Kratom – Public Health Focus. 2025. 2 .

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Consumer Update: Products Containing 7- Hydroxymitragynine Can Cause Serious Harm. 2025.
3 .

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Press Release: FDA Takes Steps to Restrict 7-OH Opioid Products Threatening American Consumers. July 2025. 4 .

Kruegel, A.C. et al. “Preclinical Characterization of Mitragynine and 7- Hydroxymitragynine.” Neuropharmacology. 2019.
5 .

Yohannan, J. et al. “Human Pharmacokinetics of Mitragynine and 7- Hydroxymitragynine.” Molecules. 2024.
6 .

California Department of Public Health. Public Health Advisory: Foods, Dietary Supplements, and Medical Drugs Containing Kratom and 7-OH Are Dangerous and Illegal. October 24, 2025.
7 .

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. Report on Kratom-Related Fatal Overdoses. 2025.
8 .

Ventura County Public Health. Advisory on Kratom and 7-OH Products. October 2025. 9 .

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Toxicology and Overdose Surveillance Data on Kratom. 2024.
10 .

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. “FDA Moves Against Vape Products That Mimic Toys, Slushies, and Appeal to Kids.” HealthDay, November 2023. 11 .

Transylvania County CARE Coalition. “Smoke Shop Report 2025: Assessment of Youth- Targeted Marketing in Tobacco and Vape Retail Environments.” June 2025. 12 .

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Youth and Tobacco Use.” 2024. 13 .

U.S. Surgeon General. “Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults.” 2024 Report.
14 .

California Department of Public Health. “Flavors Hook Kids: Youth Tobacco and Vaping Prevention Campaign.” 2024.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The designated vape shops in Lincoln collectively produce approximately $21,600 in sales tax per year for the general fund. The City does not have specific statistics relative to sales taxes 159
generation for the other retailers because they all sell general retail goods as well and the taxes are commingled.

ATTACHMENTS:

Rocklin Municipal Code re tobacco retailers.doc
Sacramento staff report and ordinance.pdf
San Francisco Ordinance.pdf
Tobacco Retail.png
Schools.png
SchoolsPerimeterTobaccoRetail.png
SchoolsTobacco Retail.png
Parks.png
ParksTobaccoRetail.png
ParksPerimeterTobaccoRetail.png
SensitiveLocations.png
SensitiveLocation&TobaccoRetail.png
160

Attachment A

161
Chapter 17.69 - RESTRICTIONS ON TOBACCO RETAILERS

17.69.010 - Purpose and findings.

A. The purpose of this chapter is to discourage the use of tobacco products by children by limiting the potential adverse direct and secondary effects of a tobacco reta iler operating in close proximity to schools. The adverse health effects of smoking and secondhand smoke are well documented by numerous public health agencies, including the United States Food and Drug Administration, th e World Health Organization, and the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program. These same organizations have published studies on smoking by youth under the age of eighteen including these statistics:
• Eighty-eight percent of adult daily smokers smoked their first cigarette before the age of eighteen.
• Each day in the United States three thousand two hundred youth under eighteen smoke their first cigarette.
• Each day in the United States seven hundred youth under eighteen become daily cigarette users.

B. Electronic/vapor inhalation of substances ("vaping"), with or without nicotine, is a rapidly growing trend, especially among youth pursuant to recent studies by public health agencies. Most local, state and federal laws only address traditional tobac co smoking. Although state law prohibits the sale of electronic cigarettes to minors (California Health and Safety Code Section 119405), it does not prohibit minors from possessing or using e -cigarettes. Public health research is ongoing and there is growing concern and some evidence that this type of behavior is unhealthy. Additionally, the effects of secondhand vapor are not fully understood and are dependent on the chemical makeup of the substance being inhaled.
(Ord. No. 1044, § 2, 9-8-2015)

17.69.020 - Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the following terms shall be ascribed the following meanings:

A. "Electronic smoking device" means an electronic and/or battery -operated device, the use of which may resemble smoking, which can be used to deliver an inhaled dose of nicotine or other substances. "Electronic smoking device" includes any such electronic smoking device, whether manufactured, distributed, marketed, or sold as an electronic cigarette, an electronic cigar, an electronic cigarillo, an ele ctronic pipe, an electronic hookah, or any other product name or descriptor. "Electronic smoking device" includes any component, part, or paraphernalia of such a product, including but not limited to car tridges, cartomizers, e -liquid, smoke juice, tips, atomizers, ESD batteries, and ESD chargers, whether or not it is sold separately.

B. "Smoking room" or "smoking lounge" means a room which is specifically provided and furnished for smoking, generally in buildings where smoking is otherwise prohibited.

C. "Tobacco product" means any product containing, made or derived from tobacco or contains nicotine from any source that is intended for human consumption, whether smoked, chewed, absorbed, dissolved, in haled, snorted, sniffed, or ingested by any other mea ns. "Tobacco product" includes, but is not limited to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco, snuff, snus, creamy snuff, dipping/chewing tobacco, flavored tobacco, tobacco water, tobacco paste, gutka, kretek, shisha, roll -your-own cigarettes, cigarette or cigar rolling papers, 162
pipes, or electronic smoking devices. "Tobacco product" does not include any product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administrati on for sale as a tobacco cessation product and is being marketed and sold solely for that approved purpose.

D. "Tobacco retailer" means any person, retail establishment, or any other legal entity who sells, distributes, or delivers to any person(s), for any form of consideration, tobacco products, including electronic smoking devices as defined in this section, and 1) tobacco products sales, distribution or delivery accounts for more than fifty percent of the business income, or 2) the business is advertised as a tobacco shop, smoke shop, or has a similar b usiness identification relating to a tobacco retailer.
(Ord. No. 1044, § 2, 9-8-2015)

17.69.030 - Location of tobacco retailer.

A tobacco retailer is allowed as otherwise permitted in this title provided that the tobacco retailer complies with all other locational regulations of this section. No tobacco retailer shall be located, established nor operated within one thousand feet of any developed or designated public, private or charter school providing primary or secondary education, or within one thousa nd feet of any preexisting tobacco retailer. For purposes of this subsection, "designated" means a parcel that is general plan designated, zoned, or that has been conditionally permitted to conduct such use. The separation distances required by this chapter shall be measured from parcel line to parcel line. (Ord. No. 1044, § 2, 9-8-2015)

17.69.040 - Preexisting nonconforming use.

Existing tobacco retailers that were lawfully operating at the time of the effective date of this chapter which do not meet the locational requirements of Section 17.69.030 may continue as a legal nonconforming use until such time as the use is abandoned for a period of ninety continuous days, whether or not there was the intent to abandon such use. Such nonconforming uses shall not be enlarged, expanded, or extended.
(Ord. No. 1044, § 2, 9-8-2015)

17.69.050 - Ventilation.

Any smoking room or smoking lounge shall provide ventilation and filtration in accordance with all requirements imposed by the Rocklin Building and Fire Safety Regulations, or as otherwise required by state or federal law, or as required to ensure the ventilated secondhand smoke is suffi ciently neutralized at the property line of adjacent parcels so that a person of normal sensitivity would not detect the secondhand smoke.
(Ord. No. 1044, § 2, 9-8-2015)
163
Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney Mindy Cuppy, City Clerk John Colville, City Treasurer Howard Chan, City Manager
City Council Report
915 I Street, 1st Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
www.cityofsacramento.org

File ID: 2019-00385 April 16, 2019 Discussion Item 05

Title: Ordinance Revisions to Chapter 5.138 of Sacramento City Code Relating to Tobacco Retailers (Passed for Publication 03/12/2019; Published 03/15/2019) [Continued from 03/26/2019]

Location: Citywide

Recommendation: Adopt an ordinance revising Chapter 5.138 of the Sacramento City Code relating to Tobacco Retailers.

Contact: Jose Mendez, Code Enforcement Manager, (916) 808-5947, Community Development Department

Presenter: Jose Mendez, Code Enforcement Manager, (916) 808-5947, Community Development Department

Attachments:
1-Description/Analysis
2-Ordinance (Redline)
3-Ordinance (Clean)