ǣͳͺǦͲͲͳǢͳͺǦͲͲͳǢ
ͳͺǦͲͲͳǢ
ͳͺǦͲͲͳǢͳͺǦͲͲͳǢ
ͳͺǦͲͲͳǢͳͺǦͲͲͳǢͳͺǦͲͲǢͳͺǦͲͲǢͳͺǦͲͲͻ
ǣ
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
͵Ǥ͵Ǧʹ
Ǥ
ǦǦͳǣ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ Ǧ ʹͲ
ሺ
ሻǤ
Ǥ
ǦǦʹǣ
ʹͲͳͲǦ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ʹͲͳͲ
Ǥ
ʹͲͳͲ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǦǦ͵ǣ
ǯ Ǥ ǯ
ሺ
ሻ Ǧ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ATTACHMENT 4
Exhibit C
503
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǯ Ǥ ǯ ሺ ሻ Ǥ ሺǦ͵ሻ
Ȁ
ǯ
ǡ
ǣ
x
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ͳ
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
ǯ
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
342
ATTACHMENT 4 504
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
x
ǯǡ
Ǥ
͵Ǥ͵ǦͶ
ሺ
ሻǤ
ǦǦͳǣ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ Ǧ ʹͲ
ሺ
ሻǤ
Ǥ
ǦǦʹǣ
ʹͲͳͲǦ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ʹͲͳͲ
Ǥ
ʹͲͳͲ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǦǦ͵ǣ
ǯ Ǥ ǯ
ሺ
ሻ Ǧ
ǡǡ
ǯ Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
343
ATTACHMENT 4 505
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǯ ሺ ሻ Ǥ ሺǦ͵ሻ Ȁ
ǯ
ǡ
ǣ
x
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ͳ
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
ǯ
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
344
ATTACHMENT 4 506
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
x
ǯǡ
Ǥ
3.3-5 Implementation of the proposed Plan
would expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations from
new sources of toxic air containments.
ǦͶǣ
ͳǡͲͲͲ
Ǥ
ͳǡͲͲͲ
ǡ
ሺሻǡǦ
ሺ
ሻ
Ǧ
ሺ
ሻǤ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
ሺሻǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǧ
Ȁ
ሺሻǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡǡ
345
ATTACHMENT 4 507
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǡ
ǡ
͵ǤͶǦʹ
ǡ
ǡ
.
Ǧ
Ǧͳǣ
Ǥ
ǣ
ͳǤ ʹͲ
ሺ Ǧሻ Ǥ
ʹǤ
ʹͷ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡǦǡ ǡ
ǡሺ
ሻǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
͵Ǥ
ʹͷ
Ǥ
ͶǤ
ͳͷ
ͳ Ͳ
Ǥ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ
346
ATTACHMENT 4 508
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
ͷǤ ͺͷ
ʹͲͶͲǤ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ሺǤǤ
ǡ
ǡ
ሻǤ
Ǥ ͷͲ
ሺሻ
Ǧ
ʹͲ
Ǥ
3.4-3 Implementation of the proposed Plan
would conflict with an applicable plan,
policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of
GHGs.
Ǧ
Ǧͳǣ
Ǥ
ǣ
ͳǤ ʹͲ
ሺ Ǧሻ Ǥ
ʹǤ
ʹͷ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡǦǡ ǡ
ǡሺ
ሻǡ ǡ ǡ ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ ǡ
ǡ
ǡ ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
͵Ǥ
COL TM, FM, BP,
PC
347
ATTACHMENT 4 509
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ʹͷ
Ǥ
ͶǤ
ͳͷ
ͳ Ͳ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ͷǤ ͺͷ
ʹͲͶͲǤ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ሺǤǤ
ǡ
ǡ
ሻǤ
Ǥ ͷͲ
ሺሻ
Ǧ
ʹͲ
Ǥ
͵ǤǦͳ
Ǥ
ǦͳǤ
Ǥ
ሺǤǤǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǤሻǤ
͵ǤǦͳǡ
ͳ
ǦͳǤͷ
ǡǡǡ
348
ATTACHMENT 4 510
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ሺǤǤǡǡ
ǡ
ǡሻ
ǣሺሻͷͷͷͲሺǣͲͲǤǤͳͲǣͲͲ ǤǤሻሺሻͶͷͷͲሺͳͲǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤሻǤ
ǡ
ǦǦͺǡ
ǡ
Ǧǡ ǡǣ
x
ǡ
ͷǣͲͲǤǤͳʹǣͲͲǤͲ
ͳʹǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤ
x
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ ͷ
ǣͲͲǤǤͳʹǣͲͲǤͷͳʹǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤ 3ǤǦ͵
Ǥ
ǦͳǤ
Ǥ
^ƚĂƚŝŽŶĂƌLJ
ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚEŽŝƐĞ
ሺǤǤǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǤሻǤ
͵ǤǦͳǡ
ͳ
ǦͳǤͷ
ሺǤǤǡǡ
ǡ
ǡሻ
ǣሺሻͷͷͷͲሺǣͲͲǤǤͳͲǣͲͲ ǤǤሻሺሻͶͷͷͲሺͳͲǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤሻǤ
ǡ
ǦǦͺǡ
ǡ
Ǧǡ ǡǣ
ǡǡ
ǡ
349
ATTACHMENT 4 511
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
x
ǡ
ͷǣͲͲǤǤͳʹǣͲͲǤͲ
ͳʹǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤ
x
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ ͷ
ǣͲͲǤǤͳʹǣͲͲǤͷͳʹǣͲͲǤǤǣͲͲǤǤ
͵ǤǦͳ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
.
Ǧ
Ǧͳǣ
Ǧ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧ
ǡ
Ǧ
ǡ
ሺ ǡʹͲͲͻሻǤ
Ǣ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǣ
Ǥ
ሺͳʹሻ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ȁ
ǡ
ǡ
Ȁ
Ǧ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
350
ATTACHMENT 4 512
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǧǡ
ǡǤ
x
Ǥ
x ͺͲ
Ǥ
x ͺͲ
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦʹǣǤ
ሺ
ሻ
ሺ ͳ͵ͳሻǤ
ǡ
Ǧ
ሺ
ǡ
ሻ͵ͲͲ
ǦǦǤ
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ሺ
ǡǡ
351
ATTACHMENT 4 513
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ሻ
Ǥ
ǡǦ
Ǧ ǡ
ǡǤ ̵
Ǣ
ʹͷͲͷͲǤ
ǡ
Ǥ͵ͲͲ ǯ Ǥ
ͳͷ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ሺǤǤǡ
ǡǡ
ሻǤ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ȁ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ȁ
Ǥ
Ȁ
ǡ
352
ATTACHMENT 4 514
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧ͵ǣǤ
Ǧ
ሺͳ
͵ͳሻ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǯ ሺ
ǡʹͲͳʹሻǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
ሺ ͳ
͵ͳሻǡ
Ǥ
ͷͲͲ
ǡ
Ǥ
ሺ
ǡʹͲͳʹሻǤ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
353
ATTACHMENT 4 515
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǡͲǦǦ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦͶǣ
Ǥ
͵ͲͲ
ሺ ͳ
͵ͳሻǡ
Ǥ
ǡǦ
ʹͷͲ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦǦ ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦͷǣǤ
ሺǤǤǡ
ͶͲͲ
ǡ
ǡǡሻǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
ͷͲǦǦ
Ǧ
Ǧ
354
ATTACHMENT 4 516
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to approval of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to appr oval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-going
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧǣ
Ǥ
ǡ
ʹͲͲǤ ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
ͳͶ͵Ͳ
ሺǤǤǡ
ሻǤ
ͳͲͲሺ ͳ ͵ͲሻǤ
ʹͲͲ
ሺͳͲͲǦ ሻǡ
ሺͳ
͵ͳሻǤ
Ǥ
355
ATTACHMENT 4 517
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǧ
ǦǣǦ Ǥ
Ȁ Ǧሺሻ ሺͶǦሻ
Ǧ
Ǧ
ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
ǡǡͷͲͲ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦǤ
͵͵Ͳ
Ǥ
Ȁ
Ǥ
ͳ
ͳǡ
Ǧ Ǥ
Ǧ
ǡ
356
ATTACHMENT 4 518
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǡǦǤ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦͺǣǤ
ǡ
ǡǡ ሺͶǦሻ
ሺ ሻ
ͷͲǦǦ
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
x
ͳͲͲ
Ǥ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
x ǡ Ǥ
357
ATTACHMENT 4 519
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
x ሺǦǦ
ሻǤ
Ǧ
ǦͻǣǤ
ͳͷ
͵Ͳǡ
ʹ Ǥ
Ǧሺ
ǡ
ǡǡǡ
ǡ
Ǥሻ
ሺǤǤǡǡ
ǡǡ
ǤሻǤ
Ǧ Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
x ͳͳͷሺ ሻ
ሺ
ሻǤ
x
ͳͷ
͵Ͳǡ
ሺǦሻ
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
ͳͷ 358
ATTACHMENT 4 520
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
x
ǡ
͵Ͳ
ͳͷǡǤ
ǡ
Ǥǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
͵ǤǦʹ
Ȁ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦͳͲǣ
Ǥ
ሺǤǤǡǡǡ
ሻ
Ǧ
ሺǤǤǡ ሻ Ǥ
Ǥ
ǯ
ǡ ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
359
ATTACHMENT 4 521
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧ
ǦͳͳǣǤ
x
ǡ
Ǥ Ǧ
Ǥǡ
ʹǣͳሺǤǤ ǡ
Ȁ
Ȁ
ͳ
ሻ
ͳǣͳ
ሺ Ǧ
ሻǤ
Ǥ
ͷǡ
Ǥ
x
ሺ
ሻ
ǯ
ǡ Ǥ
Ǧ
360
ATTACHMENT 4 522
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǧ
Ǣǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ͳ
ǡͺͲ
ǡ
ͷ
Ǥ
x
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ሺ
ሻǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡǡ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
361
ATTACHMENT 4 523
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
͵ǤǦ͵
ͶͲͶ
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧͳʹǣ
Ǥ
ሺǤǤǡǡ
ǡ
ሻ
Ǧ
ሺǤǤǡሻ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
ǯ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
Ǧ
Ǧͳ͵ǣ
Ǧ
ሺ
ሻ
Ǧ Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǧǡ
ሺǦሻ ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
ǡ
362
ATTACHMENT 4 524
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification
COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to appro val of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to ap proval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-goin g
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
Ǥ
ሺ
ǯሻ
ሺǡ
ǡሻ
Ǧ ሺ
ሻǡ
ǦǤ
ǡ
ǡǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǧ
Ǥ
Ǥ
x ǡ ǡ
Ǥ
x ͺͲ
Ǥ
x ͺͲ
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
x
Ǥ
363
ATTACHMENT 4 525
Responsible Agency/Department/Party Timing of Verification COL City of Livermore CDFW California Department of Fish & Wildlife TM Prior to approval of tentative tract maps Zone 7 Alameda County Flood Control District – Zone 7 USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service FM Prior to approval of final tract maps LARPD Livermore Area Recreation and Park District LVJUSD Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District BP Prior to appr oval of building and/or grading plans BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District LPC Las Positas College C During construction LAVTA Livermore Amador Valley Transit Agency BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District PC Post construction/on-going
SUMMARY OF IMPACT SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURE AGENCY
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
VERIFICATION
TIMING OF
VERIFICATION
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
ǡ
Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
Ǥ
364
ATTACHMENT 4 526
CITY OF LIVERMORE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
AND CONNECTION FEES
Effective January 1, 2021
TYPE OF FEE CITY CODE AND
RESOLUTION WHEN PAYABLE
City Storm Drainage Title 13.44.020,050,100 With Building Permit Ord. 1923
Reso. 2010-177
County Storm Drainage ACFC & WCD With Building Permit
Building Zone 7 Co. Ord. 0-2010-001
Reso. R-2001-4
County Storm Drainage ACFC & WCD With filing of Final Map Public Improvements e.g. Co. Ord. 0-2010-001 or approval of streets, sidewalks, Reso. R-2001-4 Improvement Plans
trails, etc.
County Storm ACFC & WCD With award of
Drainage - Capital Co. Ord. 0-2010-001 contract
Improvements Reso. R-2001-4
Sanitary Sewer Title 13.28.050 With Building Permit
Connection Ord. 1740
Reso. 2010-177
Park Land Dedication Title18.32.020
Ord. 1744
Reso. 2004-259
Concurrently with, or
before the filing of the
first parcel or final map
Park Facilities Fee Title 12.60
Ord. 1743
Reso. 2005-152
With Building Permit
City Water Title 13.20.020 With Building Permit 5/8" $4,608 Connection (1) Ord. 1507 3/4" $6,913
Reso. 2010-177 1" $11,521
1-1/2" $23,042
2" $36,868
Alameda County Ord. FC 72-1 as With Building Permit 5/8" $29,440 Water Connection amended by 3/4" $44,160
Zone 7 FC-96-1792 and See Zone 7 Attachment 1" $73,600
updated 10-20-10
In-Lieu Low Income Title 3.26 With Building Permit
Housing Fee Reso. 2020-186
(Residential)
For Sale & Neighborhood
Plan Areas
Ord. 1988 and 1989 (Effective 10/26/2020) Low Income Housing Title 3.26 With Building Permit Commercial Unit KSF Fee per Unit Impact Fee Reso. 99-18 Retail Commercial KSF $1,367
(Commercial and Ord. 1549 Discount/Service Retail KSF $1,029 Industrial) Office Commercial KSF $878
Hotels/Motels Room $671
Industrial
Manufacturing KSF $422
Warehouse/Storage KSF $123
Business/Commercial KSF $872
Industrial, High Intensity KSF $433
Industrial, Low Intensity KSF $274
NOTE: Subject to adjustment each year per Construction Cost Index (1) Areas within the California Water Service Area do not pay a City water connection fee. Areas within the Greenville/Vasco Assessment District or within Triad Park do not pay a City water connection fee. The fee for a single family residential unit is the 5/8 inch meter fee. (2) All projects within the Downtown Specific Plan are subject to both City Wide General Plan & Downtown Specific Plan cost recovery. Any project that paid planning entitlement fees prior to July 27, 2008 is not subject to this fee, regardless of when they pull building permits.
NOTE: No impact fees can be charged for ADUs less than 750 square feet. Impact fees allowed for ADUs 750 square feet or larger but shall be charged proportionately in relation to square footage of the primary dwelling.
AMOUNT OF FEE
$0.47/SF
Impervious Surface
$1.00/SF
Impervious Surface
$1.00/SF
Impervious Surface
$1.00/SF
Impervious Surface
Price per User for Meter Size, FOR LARGER METERS, INQUIRE See Attached
Exhibit "B"
The City may approve a credit against the Park Facilities Fee for park land dedication made under LMC 18.32.020. The credit may not exceed the value of the dedication requirement. See LMC 12.60.070 for credit details N/A for Non-Residential
See Attached
Exhibit "A"
Price per User for Meter Size, FOR LARGER METERS, INQUIRE $29.23/SF for all residential housing developments 10 units or less. Projects more than 10 units are subject to must-build requirement of ordinance.
Rental exempt from In-Lieu with exception of Neighborhood Plan Areas (Pell & Brisa)
ATTACHMENT 4
Exhibit D
527
CITY OF LIVERMORE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
AND CONNECTION FEES
Effective January 1, 2021
TYPE OF FEE CITY CODE AND
RESOLUTION WHEN PAYABLE AMOUNT OF FEE
Traffic Impact Fee
NOTE: If special
Assessment District
exists, special
calculations are required
For info regarding the
appropriate
development categories
see Section 12.30 of
the City of Livermore
Municipal Code
With Building Permit
Reso 2005-151
Ord. 1742
Tri-Valley Title 12.24.050 With Building Permit Residential Transportation Ord. 2012 Single family
Development (TVTD) Reso. 2014-184 Multi-family
Fee Affordable Housing*
ADU/SDU** $0.00
*Reso 2015-01 Non Residential
**Reso 2019-03 Retail
Office
Industrial
See Attached Annual
Adjustment to TVTD Fee
Other
Social/Human Services
Facility Fee
Title 12.70
Ord. 1851
With Building Permit
Ord. 1836 Title
12.51 0.33% of total project
valuation
Residential Fee Per Unit
Dwelling Unit $6,032
Non Residential (6) Per SF
Retail/Office $18.59
Major attraction fee Resolution 2003-114 $1,376
South Livermore Road Improvement fee Resolution 2003-114 $11,418 NOTE: No impact fees can be charged for ADUs less than 750 square feet. Impact fees allowed for ADUs 750 square feet or larger but shall be charged proportionately in relation to square footage of the primary dwelling. (1) Areas within the California Water Service Area do not pay a City water connection fee. Areas within the Greenville/Vasco Assessment District or within Triad Park do not pay a City water connection fee. The fee for a single family residential unit is the 5/8 inch meter fee.
See Attached
Exhibit "E"
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEES
TYPE OF FEE
In-Lieu Payment for Public Open Space Resolution 2005-041 NOTE: Subject to adjustment each year per Construction Cost Index Resolution 2017-006
$19,756.14
$0.31/SF
In-Lieu Parking Fee
Downtown Revitalization Fee Title 12.32
Downtown Specific Plan - cost recovery (2) Resolution 2008-123 SOUTH LIVERMORE VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN DEVELOPMENT FEES (1)
TYPE OF FEE CITY CODE AND RESOLUTION FEE PER RESIDENTIAL UNIT Plan preparation fee Resolution 2003-114
$3,376.47
CITY RESOLUTION AMOUNT OF FEE
$50 per square foot of required open space
(2) All projects within the Downtown Specific Plan are subject to both City Wide General Plan & Downtown Specific Plan cost recovery. Any project that paid planning entitlement fees prior to July 27, 2008 is not subject to this fee, regardless of when they pull building permits. $1,502
Recycled water fee Resolution 98-175 20% of the current Alameda County Water Connection Fee
Art in Public Places Fee
$4,850.00
$0.00
Average Peak Hour Trip
$5,446.41
Per KSF
$3,630.00
$8,330.00
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
The City of Livermore collects School Mitigation Development Fees (school fees) on behalf of the Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. The fees must be paid for by cash or a check made out to the City of Livermore. Fees are due upon issuance of a qualifying building permit.
See Attached Exhibit "D"
See Attached Exhibit "C"
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES:
SOCIAL / HUMAN SERVICES FACILITY
Fee Per Unit
$4,901.69
ATTACHMENT 4
528
CITY OF LIVERMORE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2021
Avg Daily Wastewater
Flow Factor Cost Per Cost Per
User Classification Gallons Per Day/Unit Unit1
GPD Unit
Residential (BOD & SS = 285 mg/L)
Single-family residential 180 House $38.20 $6,876.00
Multi-family residential
Studio 95 Residential Unit $38.20 $3,629.00
One Bedroom 107 Residential Unit $38.20 $4,087.40
Two Bedroom 138 Residential Unit $38.20 $5,271.60
Three Bedroom 157 Residential Unit $38.20 $5,997.40
Four Bedroom 180 Residential Unit $38.20 $6,876.00
Commercial (BOD & SS = 285 mg/L unless otherwise shown) Auto repair shops/Auto dealers 0.11 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $4.20 Assembly Facilities2 0.15 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $5.73 Eating drinking facilities w/o cooking 0.35 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $13.37 Gas Stations 0.47 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $17.95
General Use 0.04 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $1.53
Gyms, Health Clubs 0.30 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $11.46 Hotels, Motels (excluding dining facilities) 0.15 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $5.73 Markets 0.19 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $7.26
Mixed Use3 0.10 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $3.82
Medical/Dental Office/ Clinic 0.22 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $8.40 Restaurants (1,000 mg/L BOD, 600 mg/L SS) 0.55 Square Foot of Bldg $56.29 $30.96 Warehouse/Distribution 0.01 Square Foot of Bldg $38.20 $0.38 Industrial/Other (Other Wastewater Customers Not Listed Above) Calculate Case-by-Case Based on Actual Flows/Strengths and Following Rates Connection Fee = (F x "Flow") + (B x "BOD") + (S x "SS") F = Flow cost $/gpd $29.58
B = BOD cost $/lb-day $2,573.31
S = SS cost $/lb-day $1,047.51
discharge
flow, in
"BOD" = The
"SS" = The
Governing Municipal Code Section: 13.28.050
Index Used: ENR 20- City Construction Cost Index
Previous % Change
Base Fee Current Previous Update
Year Update Fee Update to Current Update
Indices: (A) (B) (C) (D) =(C/B)-1
Index Date May-10 Jun-19 May-20
Index Value 8,761.47 11,230.01 11,418.16 1.68%
Discussion:
Notes:
4. This value is based by formula on BOD
6. Adjustments. The city council may, by resolution, adjust the fee schedule, including the flow factors, from time to time.
Once the fee is established, it shall automatically be increased annually based upon the Engineering News Record (ENR) 20- City construction Cost Index. In calculating the adjustment, the rate (in each use category, including the flow, BOD and SS costs) for the base year is multiplied by the index for the then-current year, divided by the base year index.
EXHIBIT A
1. Building square footage means the square footage sum of the floor area at each floor level included with the surrounding principal outside faces of exterior walls of a building or portions thereof, including mezzanines and lobbies. It does not include floor area devoted to vehicle parking, necessary interior driveways and ramps. The gross floor area of a building or portions thereof that doesn't have surrounding exterior walls shall include the usable area under the horizontal projection of the roof or floor above.
3. Mixed Use applies to parcels with Mixed Use zoning and in the Downtown Core District only.
2. Theaters can alternately estimate daily flow based on 2 gallons per seat ($76.40 per seat) The base year unit fees for Flow, BOD, and SS were determined in theMarch 2010 Wastewater, Water, Storm Drain Connection Fee Study for Expansion of Sanitary Sewer, Water Reclamation Plant, and Wastewater Disposal Facilities prepared for the City of Livermore by Craig R. Lawson Utility Management Consultant.
Wastewater Connection Fee Schedule
(fees Calculated from base year)
ATTACHMENT 4
529
CITY OF LIVERMORE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2021
Non-Residential (per 1,000 sq ft)
Source - Park Facilities Fee Study (2004) Table 8; MuniFinancial Warehouse $1,056
Commercial $2,114
Multi-Family 3 bedrooms $14,509
Multi-Family 2 bedrooms $12,787
Senior Housing
$8,840
$1,406
Office $3,023
Industrial
Multi-Family 1 bedroom $9,894
$2,837
Multi-Family Studio
Residential (per dwelling unit)
EXHIBIT B
Park Facilities Fee Schedule
Single Family (& 4 bedroom multi-family) $16,676
TOTAL FEELAND USE
ATTACHMENT 4
530
CITY OF LIVERMORE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2021
Units of Use Fee Rates
d.u. $9,437
d.u. $4,398
d.u. $4,924
d.u. $6,362
d.u. $7,440
d.u. $2,896
K s.f. $25,629
K s.f. $16,407
K s.f. $10,187
K s.f. $5,147
per/room $7,399
d.u. $2,700
d.u. $3,023
d.u. $3,906
d.u. $4,568
K s.f. $11,605
Average Peak Hour Trip $11,794
1 Bedroom
Industrial
Warehouse
Commercial
3 or more Bedroom
2 Bedroom
EXHIBIT C
Traffic Impact Fees Schedule
Multi-Family
Studio
Land Uses
Citywide Except Downtown
Residential
Single-Family
Multi-Family
Studio
Hotel/Motel
Downtown Specific Plan
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 or more Bedroom
Senior Housing
Commercial
Office
Other
ATTACHMENT 4
531
CITY OF LIVERMORE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2021
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District Resolution: 044 - 19/20 Fee Effective May 18, 2020 (see attached Reso)
INDUSTRIAL/WAREHOUSE/MANUFACTURING $0.66/sq.ft.
OFFICE $0.66/sq.ft.
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT $0.66/sq.ft.
HOSPITALS $0.66/sq.ft.
RETAIL & SERVICES $0.624/sq.ft.
HOTEL/MOTEL: $0.316/sq.ft.
SELF STORAGE $0.18/sq.ft.
RESIDENTIAL: $4.08/sq.ft.
(Includes single family home, multi-family home, manufactured home, and mobile home) SENIOR HOUSING $0.66/sq.ft.
(Includes manufactured home or mobile home located in a mobile home park, subdivision, cooperative or condiminium for mobile homees limited to 55 and older residents.)
RESIDENTIAL ADDITIONS $4.08/sq.st. (501 sq.ft. or more) (Residential additions 500 sq.ft. or less and senior housing projects are exempt) * Additions are cumulative over time to a limit of 500 sf before fees square footage.
** The fee owed is based upon the fee amount in effect at the time the fee is paid.
LIVERMORE VALLEY JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
685 East Jack London Blvd, Livermore, Ca 94551
FACILITIES PLANNING AND CONSTRUCTION
Jan Shipley, Construction Supervisor (925) 606-3390
Facilities Fax Number (925) 606-3327
Exhibit "D"
LIVERMORE VALLEY JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF SCHOOL MITIGATION PROGRAM
are assesed. Once assessed, fees are paid on the entire added ATTACHMENT 4
532
CITY OF LIVERMORE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2021
Units of Use Fee Rates
d.u. $1,677
d.u. $1,415
d.u. $1,298
d.u. $996
d.u. $996
K s.f. $7
K s.f. $5
K s.f. $5
K s.f. $3
K s.f. $2
K s.f. $6
K s.f. $3
K s.f. $5
Mobile Home
Single-Family Detached
Single-Family Attached
Multi-Family
Office
Secondary Unit
Non-Residential Uses
Commercial
EXHIBIT E
Social and Human Service Facility Fee Schedule
Land Uses
Residential Uses
Retail
Office
Other Non-Residential
Service
Industrial
Manufacturing/R&D
Warehousing
Construction/Repair/Wholesale
ATTACHMENT 4
533
Zone 7 M&I Connection Fee
Rate Schedule
Effective Janaury 1, 2020
Meter Size
Recommended
Maximum Rate for
Continuous Use
(gpm)
Connection Fee
Amount
5/8" & 1" FS* 10 $29,440
3/4" 15 $44,160
1" 25 $73,600
(DISPLACEMENT
TYPE) 50 $147,200
Omni C2 160 $471,040
Omni T2 160 $471,040
OMNI WITH
50GPM RESTICTOR 50 $147,200
(DISPLACEMENT
TYPE) 80 $235,520
OMNI WITH
80GPM RESTICTOR 80 $235,520
Mueller MVR
Pleasanton Only 115 $338,560
OMNI WITH
120GPM RESTICTOR 120 $353,280
Omni C2 160 $471,040
Omni T2 200 $588,800
3" to 10" **
* When the Fire Department requires fire sprinklers, a 1-inch meter may be obtained at the same rate as a 5/8-inch meter.
** Connection fees for meter sizes 3-inches and above will be determined by using the fee factor for maximum continuous flow rate.
Fees for meters other than those listed above will be determined based upon the maximum continuous flow rating for the brand and type of meter.
These fees are based on the Maximum Continuous Flow Rate through a 5/8" meter as defined by AWWA C700 for Cold-Water Meter -- Displacement Type, Bronze Case.
Any changes to meter capacities will affect the above connection fees.
Currently, the 2-inch Mueller MVR is only available in Pleasanton. 1 1/2"
2"
e:\steven\connfee\admin\connfee2002\connection fee rate schedule 01-01-20.xlsx Zone7M&I w-gpm ATTACHMENT 4
534
ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ZONE 7 100 NORTH CANYONS PARKWAY, LIVERMORE, CA 94551 PHONE (925) 454-5000 FAX (925) 454-5727
WATER CONNECTION FEE INFORMATION SHEET
Effective January 1, 2020
I. GENERAL BACKGROUND
A. The Water Connection Charge Ordinance No. FC 72-1 as amended for Zone 7 was established January 18, 1972. The ordinance is applicable over the Zone 7 area that includes Livermore, Pleasanton, Dublin, Sunol, and surrounding communities.
The Ordinance requires a one-time water connection fee for all new water services from a water system that is directly connected to the Zone 7 water supply system.
This fee is used for funding the costs of expanding the Zone 7 water treatment and distribution system to serve new development.
B. The amount charged for a water connection is determined by the size of the meter to be installed. The meter sizes and corresponding water connection fees are listed below.
II. PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT OF WATE R CONNECTION FEES IN LIVERMORE,
PLEASANTON, & DUBLIN
The water connection fees are collected by the Building Departments of the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, and by the Dublin San Ramon Services District, which are agents for Zone 7. For that area within the Cal Water service area which is located outside of the Livermore city limits, connection fees will be paid at the Zone 7 office in Livermore.
III. WATER CONNECTION FEE SCHEDULE - FEES ARE REVIEWED AND SUBJECT TO
PERIODIC MODIFICATION
Meter Size Fee Factor Connection Fee
5/8" (DISPLACEMENT TYPE) 1.0 $29,440
3/4" (DISPLACEMENT TYPE) 1.5 $44,160
1" (DISPLACEMENT TYPE) 2.5 $73,600
1½” (DISPLACEMENT TYPE) 5.0 $147,200
1½” (OMNI C2) 16.0 $471,400
1½” (OMNI T2) 16.0 $471,400
2” (OMNI w/Restriction to 50GPM) 5.0 $147,200
2” (DISPLACEMENT TYPE) 8.0 $235,520
2” (OMNI w/Restriction to 80GPM) 8.0 $235,520
2” Mueller MVR 11.5 $338,560
2” (OMNI w/Restriction to 120GPM) 12.0 $353,280 2” (OMNI C2) 16.0 $471,400
2” (OMNI T2) 20.0 $588,800
ATTACHMENT 4
535
* Connection fees for meters 3-inch and larger and for meters with fee factors other than those listed above, will be determined by Zone 7, using the fee factor for Maximum Rate for Continuous Operation, as defined by AWWA. These fees are based on the Maximum Continuous Flow Rate through a 5/8" meter and are proportional based on flow ratings for the various sized meters. Flow ratings for displacement type meters are defined by AWWA C700 for Cold-Water Meter -- Displacement Type, Bronze Case. Flow ratings for turbine type meters are defined by AWWA C701 for Cold Water Meters -- Turbine Type, For Customer Service. Any changes to meter capacities will affect the above connection fees
.
NOTE: This new fee schedule is effective January 1, 2020
IV. EXEMPTIONS
No fee will be collected for SEPARATE private fire service connections. See Section VI of the Ordinance (copy available upon request).
V. PARTIAL EXEMPTIONS
A partial exemption sometimes applies for domestic fire sprinkling systems up to 1" meter size. See Section VI of the Ordinance (copy available upon request).
VI. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
Call Steven Ellis at (925) 454-5037 or e-mail at [email protected].
ATTACHMENT 4
536
RESOLUTION NO. 044-19/20
TO UPDATE STATUTORY DEVELOPER FEES IMPOSED ON NEW RESIDENTIAL
AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PURSUANT TO EDUCATION CODE SECTION 17620
WHEREAS, the School Board ("Board") of the Livermore Valley Joint Unified District ("District") provides for the educational needs for TK-12 students within the City of Livermore and a portion of the unincorporated counties of Alameda and Contra Costa (collectively, "Counties"); and WHEREAS, The State Allocation Board has taken action pursuant to Government Code Section 65995(b)(3), which authorizes Districts to increase Statutory Developer Fees to $4.08 per square foot for assessable space of residential development and $0.66 per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space for all categories of commercial/industrial development, as long as such Statutory Developer Fees are properly justified by the District pursuant to law; and WHEREAS, new residential and commercial/industrial development continues to generate additional students for the District's schools and the District is required to provide school facilities ("School Facilities") to accommodate those students; and
WHEREAS, overcrowded schools within the District would have an impact on the District's ability to provide an adequate quality education and negatively impacts the educational opportunities for the District's students; and
WHEREAS, the District does not have sufficient funds available for the construction or reconstruction of the School Facilities, including acquisition of sites, construction of permanent School Facilities, and acquisition of interim School Facilities, to accommodate students from new residential and commercial/industrial development; and
WHEREAS, the Board of the District has received and considered two studies entitled "Residential Development School Fee Justification Study for Livermore Valley Joint Unified District" and "Commercial/Industrial Development School Fee Justification Study for Livermore Valley Joint Unified District" ("Studies"), which Studies include information, documentation, and analysis of the School Facilities needs of the District, including (a) the purpose of the Statutory Developer Fees; (b) the use to which the Statutory Developer Fees are to be put; (c) the nexus (roughly proportional and reasonable relationship) between the residential and commercial/industrial development; and (1) the use for Statutory Developer Fees; (2) the need for School Facilities; (3) the cost of School Facilities; and the amount of Statutory Developer Fees from new residential and commercial/industrial development; (d) a determination of the impact of the increased number of employees anticipated to result from the commercial/industrial development (by category) upon the cost of providing School Facilities within the District; (e) an evaluation and projection of the number of students that will be generated by new residential development; (n the new School Facilities that will be required to serve such students; and (g) the cost of such School Facilities; and WHEREAS, said Studies pertaining to the Statutory Developer Fees and to the capital facilities needs of the District were made available to the public as required by law before the Board considered at a regularly scheduled public meeting the Statutory Developer Fees; and -1-
ATTACHMENT 4
537
(
WHEREAS, all required notices of the proposed Statutory Developer Fees have been given; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of the District relating to the proposed Statutory Developer Fees; and
WHEREAS, Education Code Section 17621 provides that the adoption, increase or imposition of any fee, charge, dedication, or other requirement, pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 shall not be subject to Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE SCHOOL BOARD OF THE LIVERMORE VALLEY JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Board accepts and adopts the Studies.
Section 2. That the Board finds that the purpose of the Statutory Developer Fees imposed upon new residential development is to fund the additional School Facilities required to serve the students generated by the new residential development upon which the Statutory Developer Fees are imposed.
Section 3. That the Board finds that the Statutory Developer Fees imposed on new residential development will be used only to finance those School Facilities described in the Study and related documents and that these School Facilities are required to serve the students generated by the new residential development within the District; and that the use of the Statutory Developer Fees will include construction or acquisition of additional School Facilities, remodeling existing School Facilities to add additional classrooms, and technology, and acquiring and installing additional portable classrooms and related School Facilities, with the specific location of new schools, remodeling of existing School Facilities, and additional portables to be determined based on the residence of the students being generated by such new residential development, as well as any required central administrative and support facilities, within the District.
Section 4. That the Board finds that there is a roughly proportional, reasonable relationship between the use of the Statutory Developer Fees and the new residential development within the District because the Statutory Developer Fees imposed on new residential development by this Resolution, will be used to fund School Facilities which will be used to serve the students generated by such new residential development.
Section 5. That the Board finds that there is a roughly proportional, reasonable relationship between the new residential development upon which the Statutory Developer Fees are imposed, and the need for additional School Facilities in the District because new students will be generated from new residential development within the District and there is not sufficient capacity in the existing School Facilities to accommodate all additional students.
Section 6. That the Board finds that the amount of the Statutory Developer Fees levied on new residential development as set forth in this Resolution is roughly proportional and reasonably related to, and does not exceed the cost of, providing the School Facilities required to serve the students generated by such new residential development within the District. ·
-2-
ATTACHMENT 4
538
Section 7. That the Board finds that the purpose of the Statutory Developer Fees imposed on new commercial/industrial development is to fund the additional School Facilities required to serve the students generated by the new commercial/industrial development upon which the Statutory Developer Fees are imposed.
Section 8. That the Board finds that the Statutory Developer Fees imposed on new commercial/industrial development (by category) will be used only to finance those School Facilities described in the Studies and related documents and that these School Facilities are required to serve the students generated by such new commercial/industrial development; and that the use of the Statutory Developer Fees will include construction or acquisition of additional School Facilities, remodeling existing School Facilities to add additional classrooms and technology, and acquiring and installing additional portable classrooms and related facilities, with the specific location of new schools, remodeling of existing School Facilities, and additional portables to be determined based on the residence of the students being generated by such new commercial/industrial development, as well as any required central administrative and support facilities within the District.
Section 9. That the Board finds that there is a roughly proportional, reasonable relationship between the use of the Statutory Developer Fees and new commercial/industrial development by category within the District because the Statutory Developer Fees imposed on commercial/industrial development by this Resolution will be used to fund School Facilities which will be used to serve the students generated by such new commercial/industrial development.
Section 10. That the Board finds that there is a roughly proportional, reasonable relationship between the new commercial/industrial development by category, upon which the Statutory Developer Fees are imposed, and the need for additional School Facilities in the District because new students will be generated from new commercial/industrial development within the District and the District does not have sufficient student capacity in the existing School Facilities to accommodate these anticipated students.
Section 11. That the Board finds that the amount of the Statutory Developer Fees levied on new commercial/industrial development by category as set forth in this Resolution is roughly proportional and reasonably related to and does not exceed the cost of providing the School Facilities required to serve the students generated by such new commercial/industrial development within the District.
Section 12. That the Board finds that a separate account has been established for the deposit of Statutory Developer Fees imposed on residential and commercial/industrial development and that said account has at all times since been separately maintained, except for temporary investments, from other funds of the District.
Section 13. That the Board finds that the funds of the account, described in Section 12, consisting of the proceeds of Statutory Developer Fees have been imposed for the purposes of constructing and reconstructing those School Facilities necessitated by new residential and commercial/industrial development, and thus, these funds may be expended for those purposes. The Statutory Developer Fees may also be expended by the District for the costs of performing any study or otherwise making the findings and determinations required under subdivisions (a), (b), and (d) of Section 66001 of the Government Code.
In addition, the District may also retain, as appropriate, an amount not to exceed in any fiscal year, three percent (3%) of the fees collected in that fiscal year pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 for reimbursement of the administrative costs incurred by the District in collecting the Statutory Developer Fees. -3-
ATTACHMENT 4
539
Section 14. That the Board hereby increases the Statutory Developer Fees as a condition of approval of new residential development projects and imposes the Statutory Developer Fees on such development projects in the following amounts:
A. $4.08 per square foot of assessable space for new single family detached residential development and new multifamily attached residential development, including new residential projects, manufactured homes and mobile homes as authorized under Education Code Section 17625, and including residential construction other than new construction where such construction results in an increase of assessable space, as defined in Government Code Section 65995, in excess of 500 square feet. However, these amounts shall not be imposed on any development project used exclusively for housing senior citizens, as described in Civil Code Section 51 .3, or as described in Subdivision J of Section 1569.2 of the Health and Safety Code or paragraph 9 of subdivision (d) of Section 15432 of the Government Code or any mobile home or manufactured home that is located within a mobile home park, subdivision, cooperative or condominium for mobile homes limited to older persons as defined by the Federal Fair Housing Amendments of 1988.
B. $0.66 per square foot of assessable space for new residential development used exclusively for the housing of senior citizens, as described in Section 51 .3 of the Civil Code or as described in subdivision J of Section 1569 of the Health and Safety Code or paragraph 9 of subdivision (d) of Section 15432 of the Government Code or any mobile home or manufactured home that is located within a mobile home park, subdivision, cooperative or condominium for mobile homes limited to older persons as defined by the Federal Fair Housing Amendments of 1988.
Section 15. That this Board hereby increases the Statutory Developer Fees as a condition of approval of new commercial/industrial development projects and levies the Statutory Developer Fees on such development projects in the following amounts per square foot of chargeable covered and enclosed space for the following categories of commercial/industrial development:
Retail and Services
Office
Research and Development
Industrial/Warehouse/Manufacturing
Hospitals
Hotel/Motel
Self-Storage
$0.624
$0.66
$0.66
$0.66
$0.66
$0.316
$0.018
Section 16. That the proceeds of the Statutory Developer Fees established pursuant to this Resolution shall continue to be deposited into that account identified in Section 12 of this Resolution, the proceeds of which shall be used exclusively for the purpose for which the Statutory Developer Fees are to be collected, including accomplishing any study, findings or determinations required by subdivisions (a), (b) and (d) of Section 66001 of the Government Code or retaining an amount not to exceed in any fiscal year, three percent (3%) of the fees collected in that fiscal year pursuant to Education Code Section 17620 for -4-
ATTACHMENT 4
540
reimbursement of the administrative costs incurred by the District in collecting the Statutory Developer Fees or in financing the described Study or in defending the imposition of Statutory Developer Fees.
Section 17. That the Superintendent, or her designee, is directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be delivered to the building official of the Cities and Counties within the District's boundaries and the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development ("OSHPD") along with a copy of all the supporting documentation referenced herein and a map of the District clearly indicating the boundaries thereof, advising the Cities, Counties, and OSHPD that new residential and commercial/industrial development is subject to the Statutory Developer Fees readopted pursuant to this Resolution and requesting that no building permit or approval for occupancy be issued by any of these entities for any new residential development project, mobile home, or manufactured home subject to the Statutory Developer Fees absent a certification from this District of compliance of such project with the requirements of the Statutory Developer Fees, nor that any building permit be issued for any non-residential development absent a certification from this District of compliance with the requirements of the applicable Statutory Developer Fees.
Section 18. That the Board hereby establishes a process that permits the party against whom the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees are imposed, the opportunity for a hearing to appeal that imposition of Statutory Developer Fees for commercial/industrial development as required by Education Code Section 17621(e)(2). The appeal process is as follows:
A. Within ten (10) calendar days of being notified, in writing, (by personal delivery or deposit in the U.S. Mail) of the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees to be imposed or paying the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees, pursuant to Education Code Section 17620, a party shall file a written request for a hearing regarding the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees. The party shall state in the written request the grounds for opposing the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees and said written request shall be served by personal delivery or certified or registered mail to the Superintendent of the District.
B. The possible grounds for that appeal include, but are not limited to, the inaccuracy of including the project within the category pursuant to which the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees are to be imposed, or that the employee generation or pupil generation factors utilized under the applicable category are inaccurate as applied to the project.
C. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the written request for a hearing regarding the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees, the Superintendent of the District, or her designee, shall give notice in writing of the date, place and time of the hearing to the party appealing the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees. The Superintendent, or her designee, shall schedule and conduct said hearing within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the written request. The Superintendent, or her designee, shall render a written decision within ten (10) days following the hearing on the party's appeal and serve it by certified or registered mail to the last known address of the party.
-5-
ATTACHMENT 4
541
D. The party against whom the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees are imposed may appeal the Superintendent's, or her designee's, decision to the Board of the District.
E. The party appealing the Superintendent's, or her designee's decision, shall state in the written appeal the grounds for opposing the imposition of the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees and said written appeal shall be served by personal delivery or certified or registered mail to the Superintendent of the District.
F. The possible grounds for that appeal to the Board of the District include, but are not limited to, the inaccuracy of including the project within the category pursuant to which the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees are to be imposed, or that the employee generation or pupil generation factors utilized under the applicable category are inaccurate as applied to the project.
G. Within ten (10) calendar days of receipt of the written request for a hearing regarding the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees, the Superintendent of the District, or her designee, shall give notice in writing of the date, place and time of the hearing to the party appealing the imposition of commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees. The Board of the District shall schedule and conduct said hearing at the next regular meeting of the Board, provided that the party is given notice at least five (5) working days prior to the regular meeting of the Board. The Board shall render a written decision within ten (10) days following the hearing on the party's appeal and serve the decision by certified or registered mail to the last known address of the party.
H. The party appealing the imposition of the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees shall bear the burden of establishing that the commercial/industrial Statutory Developer Fees are improper.
Section 19. That the Superintendent is authorized to cause a certificate of compliance to be issued for each development project, mobile home and manufactured home for which there is compliance with the requirement for payment of the Statutory Developer Fees in the amount specified by this Resolution.
In the event a certificate of compliance is issued for the payment of Statutory Developer Fees for a development project, mobile home or manufactured home and it is later determined that the statement or other representation made by an authorized party concerning the development project as to square footage is untrue, then such certificate shall automatically terminate, and the appropriate City shall be so notified.
Section 20. That no statement or provision set forth in this Resolution, or referred to therein shall be construed to repeal any preexisting fee previously imposed by the District on any residential or nonresidential development.
Section 21. That the District's Statutory Developer Fees will become effective sixty (60) days from the date of this Resolution unless a separate resolution increasing the fees immediately on an urgency basis is adopted by the Board.
-6-
ATTACHMENT 4
542
APPROVED AND ADOPTED by roll call vote this 17• day of March 2020. / / AYES: Bueno / Prusso / RoggeL Wenzel_L_White __ _
NOES: Bueno ___ Prusso ___ Rogge ___ Wenzel __ White __ _ ABSTENTIONS: Bueno ___ Prusso __ Rogge ___ Wenzel __ White __ _ ABSENT: Bueno ___ Prusso __ Rogge ___ Wenzel __ White. __ _ BY ~
Clerk of the Board of Educ tion v ore
Valley Joint Unified School Dist ct of Alameda
County and Contra Costa County, State of California
-7-
ATTACHMENT 4
543
To: Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC)
From: TVTC Finance Subcommittee (Finance Subcommittee) TVTC Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
Date: June 19, 2020
Subject: Revised Annual Adjustment to Tri -Valley Transportation Development Fee
BACKGROUND
The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) for the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (TVTDF) specifies that the TVTDF amounts are to be adjusted automatically as of July 1 of each year to reflect changes in regional construction costs. JEPA Section 3(D)(I) requires the TVTC adopt the adjustment by a simple majority.
The amount of the adjustment is based on the change in the “Construction Cost Index” (CCI) for the San Francisco Bay Area, as reported annually in the Engineering News Record (ENR). The December 2019 ENR CCI for the San Francisco Bay Area is +5.4%.
DISCUSSION
On April 15, 2020 TVTC Staff presented the annual adjustment to the TVTDF for Board adoption. There was an inadvertent error for the Retail Rate presented. The Retail Rate for FY 20/21 is $3.63/square foot Gross Floor Area.
RECOMMENDATION
The TVTC TAC recommends the TVTC adopt the adrevised CCI adjustment and each TVTC member agency collect the TVTDF rates as listed below starting July 1, 2020:
Single Family Residential $ 4,901.69/Dwelling Unit (DU) Multi-Family Residential $3,376.47/DU
Office $ 8.33/sq. ft. Gross Floor Area
Retail $3.63/sq. ft. Gross Floor Area
Industrial $4.85/sq. ft. Gross Floor Area
Other $ 5,446.41/average am/pm peak hour trip
Affordable Housing $0.00
ADU/SDU $0.00
Kathy Narum
TVTC Chair
Vice-Mayor
Pleasanton
(925) 931-5001
Scott Perkins
TVTC Vice-Chair
Councilmember
San Ramon
(925) 973-2350
Patricia Munro
Councilmember
Livermore
(925) 960-4016
Jean Josey
Councilmember
Dublin
(925) 833-6650
Karen Stepper
Mayor
Danville
(925) 275-2412
Scott Haggerty
Supervisor District 1
Alameda County
(510) 272-6691
Candace Andersen
Supervisor District 2
Contra Costa County
(925) 957-8860
ATTACHMENT 4
544
TVTDF Historical Fee Rates
2018 2019 2020
Single Family Residential (per DU) $4,613.65 $4,650.56 $4,901.69 Multi-Family Residential (per DU) $3,178.06 $3,203.48 $3,376.47 Office (per SF Gross Floor Area) $7.84 $7.90 $8.33
Retail (per SF Gross Floor Area) $3.41 $3.44 $3.63
Industrial (per SF Gross Floor Area) $4.57 $4.60 $4.85
Other (average am/pm peak hour trip) $5,126.36 $5,167.37 $5,466.41 Affordable Housing** $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
ADU/SDU*** $1845.00 $0.00 $0.00
*In 2019, the TVTC TAC recommended applying the CCI adjustment to the Retail Rate going forward **Pursuant to Resolution 2015-01 – Adjusting the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee Schedule ***Pursuant to Resolution 2019-03 – Resetting the Accessory Dwelling Unit/Secondary Dwelling Unit Fee in the Tri - Valley Transportation Fee Program
ATTACHMENT 4
545
HOUSING CRISIS ACT of 2019 – SB 330
PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FORM
PURPOSE
This form serves as the preliminary application for
housing development projects seeking vesting rights
pursuant to SB 330, the Housing Crisis Act of 2019.
GENERAL INFORMATION
An applicant for a housing development project that
includes (1) residential units (2) a mix of commercial
and residential uses with two-thirds of the project’s
square footage used for residential purposes; or (3)
transitional or supportive housing, shall be deemed to
have submitted a preliminary application upon
provision of all of the information listed in this
Preliminary Application form and payment of the
permit processing fee to the agency from which
approval for the project is being sought.
After submitting this Preliminary Application to the
local agency, an applicant has 180 days to submit a
full application or the Preliminary Application will
expire.
Submittal Date Stamp*1,2:
*1Submittal of all the information listed and
payment of the permit processing fee freezes
fees and development standards as of this date,
unless exceptions per Government Code §
65889.5(o) are triggered.
*2Note: Record keeping pertaining to which
standards and fees apply at date of submittal is
imperative, as penalties may apply for
imposing incorrect standards
Notes:
1. California Enviro
nmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Coastal Act standards apply.
2. After submittal of all of the information required, if the development proponent revises the project to change the numb
er of residential units or square footage of construction changes by 20 percent or more, excluding any increase resulting from Density Bonus Law, the development proponent must resubmit the required information so that it reflects the revisions.
ATTACHMENT 5
546
SITE INFORMATION
1. PROJECT LOCATION - The specific location, including parcel numbers, a legal description, and site address, if applicable.
Street Address ___________________________________Unit/Space Number Legal Description (Lot, Block, Tract) Attached? YES NO Assessor Parcel Number(s) _____________________________________________________
2. EXISTING USES - The existing uses on the project site and identification of major physical alterations to the property on which the project is to be located.
3. SITE PLAN - A site plan showing the building(s) location on the property and approximate square footage of each building that is to be occupied.
Attached? YES NO
4. ELEVATIONS - Elevations showing design, color, material, and the massing and height of each building that is to be occupied.
Attached? YES NO
5. PROPOSED USES - The proposed land uses by number of units and square feet of residential and nonresidential development using the categories in the applicable zoning ordinance.
NEC of N Canyons Pkway & Comcast (Triad) Drive
✔
Please see the attached Preliminary Title Report, prepared by First American Title, dated April 20, 2021.
905-0010-006
The project site is vacant. Frontage improvements, including landscaping within the parkway strip, have been completed along North Canyons Parkway and Comcast Place (Triad Drive). ✔
✔
The site is located within the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan, designated as a "transition" land use allowing 15 - 25 residential du/acre.
The proposed use is attached multi-family residential development.
Approximately 112 units in 12 three-story buildings.
Residential (total unit) area: approx. 153,120 square feet Attached Garage area: approx. 49,510 square feet ATTACHMENT 5
547
a. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT COUNT:
Please indicate the number of dwelling units proposed, including a breakdown of levels by affordability, set by each income category.
Number of Units
Market Rate
Managers Unit(s) – Market Rate
Extremely Low Income
Very Low Income
Low Income
Moderate Income
Total No. of Units
Total No. of Affordable Units
Total No. of Density Bonus Units
Other notes on units:
6. FLOOR AREA - Provide the proposed floor area and square footage of residential and nonresidential development, by building (attach relevant information by building and totals here):
Residential Nonresidential Total
Floor Area (Zoning)
Square Footage of
Construction
7. PARKING - The proposed number of parking spaces:
8. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES, WAIVERS, CONCESSIONS and PARKING REDUCTIONS - Will the project proponent seek Density Bonus incentives, waivers, concessions, or parking reductions pursuant to California Government Code Section 65915? YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe:
90 0
0 0
5 17
112
22 0
Per the INSP, 15% of the proposed units will be reserved as affordable units to be sold to moderate-income households and 5% of the units shall be set aside for median-income households.
153,220
0 153,220
202,730
0 202,730
241 Total: 2 garage parking spaces per unit (224) and 17 guest parking spaces. ✔
Median Income per the INSP
ATTACHMENT 5
548
9. SUBDIVISION – Will the project proponent seek any approvals under the Subdivision Map Act, including, but not limited to, a parcel map, a vesting or tentative map, or a condominium map? YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe:
10. POLLUTANTS – Are there any proposed point sources of air or water pollutants? YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe:
11. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS – Provide the number of existing residential units on the project site that will be demolished and whether each existing unit is occupied or unoccupied. Provide attachment, if needed.
Occupied
Residential
Units
Unoccupied
Residential
Units
Total
Residential
Units
Existing
To Be Demolished
12. ADDITIONAL SITE CONDITIONS –
a. Whether a portion of the property is located within any of the following:
i. A very high fire hazard severity zone, as determined by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, pursuant to Section 51178? YES ☐ NO ☐
ii. Wetlands, as defined in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Manual, Part 660 FW 2 (June 21, 1993)?
YES ☐ NO ☐
iii. A hazardous waste site that is listed pursuant to Section 65962.5, or a hazardous waste site designated by the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Section 25356 of the Health and Safety Code?
YES ☐ NO ☐
✔
✔
0 0
0 0
0 0
✔
✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 5
549
iv. A special flood hazard area subject to inundation by the 1 percent annual chance flood (100-year flood) as determined by any official maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency?
YES ☐ NO ☐
v. A delineated earthquake fault zone as determined by the State Geologist in any official maps published by the State Geologist, unless the development complies with applicable seismic protection building code standards adopted by the California Building Standards Commission under the California Building Standards Law (Part 2.5 (commencing with Section 18901) of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code), and by any local building department under Chapter
12.2 (commencing with Section 8875) of Division 1 of Title 2? YES ☐ NO ☐
vi. A stream or other resource that may be subject to a streambed alteration agreement pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1600) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code?
YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES” to any, please describe:
b. Does the project site contain historic and/or cultural resources? YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe:
c. Does the project site contain any species of special concern? YES ☐ NO
If “YES,” please descr
ibe:
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 5
550
d. Does the project site contain any recorded public easement, such as easements for storm drains, water lines, and other public rights of way? YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe:
e. Does the project site contain a stream or other resource that may be subject to a streambed alteration agreement pursuant to Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 1600) of Division 2 of the Fish and Game Code? Provide an aerial site photograph showing existing site conditions of environmental site features that would be subject to regulations by a public agency, including creeks and wetlands.
YES ☐ NO ☐
If “YES,” please describe and depict in attached site map:
13. COASTAL ZONE - For housing development projects proposed to be located within the coastal zone, whether any portion of the property contains any of the following:
a. Wetlands, as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 13577 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations.
YES ☐ NO ☐
b. Environmentally sensitive habitat areas, as defined in Section 30240 of the Public Resources Code.
YES ☐ NO ☐
c. A tsunami run-up zone. YES ☐ NO ☐
d. Use of the site for public access to or along the coast. YES ☐ NO ☐
14. PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION - The applicant’s contact information and, if the applicant does not own the property, consent from the property owner to submit the application.
Applicant’s Name
Company/Firm
Address _________________________________________Unit/Space Number City ___________________________ State _______ Zip Code Telephone ___________________________ Email
Are you in escrow to purchase the property? YES ☐ NO ☐ ✔
There are several recorded easements for landscaping, a private waterline, public utilities and a community driveway. Please refer to Exceptions 12, 13, 15 and 17 of the Title Report and the plotted easements map attached thereto. ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Kathryn (Kerri) Watt / Trent Sanson
Civic Property Group, Inc.
1500 Willow Pass Court
Concord
CA
94520
925-685-0110
[email protected]
✔
ATTACHMENT 5
551
Property Owner of Record ☐ Same as applicant ☐ Different from applicant Name (if different from applicant)
Address _________________________________________Unit/Space Number City ___________________________ State _______ Zip Code Telephone ___________________________ Email
Optional: Agent/Representative Name
Company/Firm
Address _________________________________________Unit/Space Number City ___________________________ State _______ Zip Code Telephone ___________________________ Email
Optional: Other (Specify Architect, Engineer, CEQA Consultant, etc.) Name
Company/Firm
Address _________________________________________Unit/Space Number City ___________________________ State _______ Zip Code Telephone ___________________________ Email
Primary Contact for Project: ☐ Owner ☐ Applicant ☐ Agent/Representative ☐ Other ✔
SDLT Investments VII, LLC
23289 Ventura Blvd
Woodland Hills
CA
91364
818-404-1443
Architect
Jeff Potts
SDG Architects
3361 Walnut Blvd
Suite 120
Brentwood
CA
94513
925-634-7000
[email protected]
✔
ATTACHMENT 5
552
ATTACHMENT 5
553
925.685.0110
Building a Better Community
February 25, 2022
City of Livermore
Community Development Department
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
ATTN: Mr. Jake Potter
Mr. Steve Riley
RE: Triad Condominiums, Subdivision (SUB 21-005; VTM 8609) and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR-21-003)
Request for Setback Concessions under CA Government Code Section 65915 (d)(2)(B) Dear Jake and Steve,
DeNova Homes, Inc. (DHI) applied under SB330 for City approval of a Vesting Tentative Map and Site Plan Design Review applications to construct 112 condominium units. Included in our application is a proposal to deed-restrict 20 percent (20%) of the proposed units –22 homes – for sale to median and moderate income households. Fifteen percent (15%) of the units would be deed -restricted for sale to moderate income households, with five percent (5%) deed-restricted for sale to median-income households.
CA Government Code Section 65915 (d)(2)(B) requires any City to grant two incentives for projects which include at least 20 percent of the total units for persons and families of moderate income in a common interest subdivision . Condominiums are a common interest subdivision. Concession s are considered waivers or reductions in development standar ds such as height limitations, setbacks, floor area ratio s, parking requirements, etc.
The proposed condominium project, with a provision for 20 percent deed-restricted affordable homes (moderate income and median income, which is less than moderate income) , is entitled to two concessions, or incentives. (Govt Code Section 65915 (d)(2) (B)). DHI is proposing a reduction in the side and rear setback requirements stipulated by the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan (INSP).
This new home community was designed to adhere to setback requirements along the existing (perimeter) property lines, i.e. adhering to the front (major street) setback requirements along North Canyons Drive and Triad Drive and the rear setback of ten feet along the northern property line. On the interior, buildings are set back a minimum of 5 feet from the edge of the street. However, the City’s current interpretation of the INSP is that the interior rear and side setbacks apply to any newly-proposed lot line. In this case, a residential building on a lot created to encapsulate that residential building would be required to meet the rear and side setbacks as measured from that new parcel line.
DHI was informed by City planning staff that they are proposing an update to the INSP which addresses
ATTACHMENT 6 554
this issue with setbacks. Staff realized that applying the INSP setbacks to each newly-created residential lot would prevent the achievement of the densities for multi-family developments indicated in the INSP.
Revising the INSP likely would involve several public hearings, and approval is not necessarily guaranteed.
Rather than waiting for City-adoption of the proposed revisions, or trying to align our project with those hearings, DHI instead chose to exercise its rights to concession s under Govt Code Section 65915 , and proceed independently. DHI realizes that it could wait for the revisions to the INSP to be approved and not use its concession rights, but we prefer to move ahead with this new housing as quickly as possible.
Concessions Exercised
The site plan has been provided to demonstrate how the project has been designed with the requested concessions to the side and rear setbacks for the proposed residential lots which encapsulate each of the residential buildings. Applying the INSP side and rear setback requirements for each individual building on its individual lot would reduce the number of buildings – and new homes – which could be achieved as currently designed. At least one building likely would be eliminated along the east -west axis and likely another building along the north -south axis to meet the side and rear setbacks. Therefore, these INSP side and rear setback requirements would physically preclude building the new home community at the desired density and unit count, thereby reducing the ability of DHI to subsidize the sale price of the affordable homes.
i. The concession or incentive does not result in identifiable and actual cost reductions, consistent with subdivision (k), to provide for affordable housing costs, as identified in Section 50052.5 of the Health and Safety Code, or for rents for the targeted units to be set as specified in subdivision (C)
ii. The concession or incentive would have a specific, adverse impacts, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 65589.5, upon public health and safety or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the speci fic adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to low - income and moderate-income households.
iii. The concession or incentive would be contrary to state or federal law.
These findings cannot be made for this project; therefore, the concession requests should be granted.
Sincerely,
Kerri Watt
Kerri Watt
Director of Entitlements
ATTACHMENT 6
555
A link to the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan can be found here:
https://www.cityoflivermore.net/government/community-development/bart-to-livermore/isabel- neighborhood-plan
ATTACHMENT 7
556
A link to the Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report can be found here:
https://www.cityoflivermore.net/government/community-development/bart-to-livermore/insp-draft- and-final-environmental-impact-report-eir
ATTACHMENT 8
557
FiguRE 2-3: SubAREA DiAgRAM
5 ac.
1/2 Mile Radius
1/4MileRadius
0 1000 2000500
FEET
Residential
Transition: 15-25 du/ac
Village: 25-40 du/ac
Center: 40-60 du/ac
Core: 60-100 du/ac
Non-Residential
Neighborhood Commercial
General Commercial
Office Core
Office
Business Park
Airway Business Park
Educational/Institutional
Open Space
Ground Floor Retail/
Overlay Flex Space
K-12 School Overlay
Parking Overlay
New Neighborhood Park/Plaza
Circulation
Valley Link
Existing Street
Proposed Street
Pedestrian Streetscape
Valley Link Pedestrian Bridge
Urban Growth Boundary
Planning Area
S
Subareas
COLLIERCANYON
RD
PORTOLA AVE
ISABEL AVE
NORTH CANYONS PKWY
NORTHCANYONS PKWY
CONSTITUTION DR
INDEPENDENCE DR
AIRWAY
BLVD
KITTY HAWK RD
LINDBERGH DR
NISSEN DR ARMSTRONG ST
AIRWA Y BLVD
E. AIRWA Y BLVD
ISABELAV
E
PORTOLA AVE
E. AIRWA Y BLVD
RUTANDR
DOOLAN RD
INTERSTATE 580
580
Las Positas
College
Valley Link to Isabel Station
Arroy o Las Po s i t a s
Livermore Municipal Airport
Arroyo La s P o s i t a s
Collier Cany on
Cr e e k
A r ro y o L a s P o s i t as
P
I n n ovat i o n
H u b
STEALTH
ST
SUTTER
ST
SHEA CENTER
DR
Cayetano
Park
MAIN ST
S
Cayetano
Creek
S
GATEWAY AVE
1d
2c
3f
2d
3d
3e
2b
3c
3b
3a
2a
1e
1a
4 1b
1c
1 ATTACHMENT 9
558
April 5, 2022
City of Livermore
1052 S Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
Re: Proposal to Approve Triad Condominiums
Dear Livermore Planning Commission and City Attorney,
The California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund (CaRLA) submits this letter to inform the Livermore Planning Commission that they have an obligation to abide by all relevant state housing laws when evaluating the proposed Triad Condominiums project. The Housing Accountability Act requires approval of zoning and general plan compliant projects, such as this one, unless findings can be made
regarding specific, objective, written health and safety hazards.
As you are well aware, California remains in the throes of a statewide crisis-level housing shortage. New housing such as this is a public benefit. It will bring increased tax revenue, new customers to local businesses, decarbonization in the face of the climate crisis, but most importantly, it will reduce the displacement of existing residents into homelessness or carbon-heavy car commutes. The laws cited in this letter are designed to allow and require cities to approve of new homes over the objection of a small minority of neighbors. Research indicates that the anti-housing voices frequent in public hearings are disproportionately white, higher-income, and homeowners. These voices do not represent the best interests of Livermore or the1 broader community. Approving developments like this one over these vocal objections is a step towards racial, economic, environmental, and social justice. We urge Livermore to approve of this development because it is the right decision for the City and is required by state law.
CaRLA is a 501(c)3 non-pro
fit corporation whose mission includes advocating
for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households. Consistent with General and Speci fic Plan policies, the
proposed development will provide additional badly needed housing and increase a