Agenda packet — Livermore City Council, December 11, 2023 (part 2 of 4)

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Left-turn, Angle CRF: 6 - 80% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 58

EXHIBIT A
277

NS03, Install signals
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection and/or influence area of the new signals. All new signals must meet MUTCD "safety" warrants: 4, 5 or 7. Given the over-arching operational changes that occur when an intersection is signalized, no other intersection CMs can be applied to the intersection crashes in conjunction with this CM.

General information
Where to use:

Traffic signals can be used to prevent the most severe type crashes (right-angle, left-turn). Consideration to signalize an unsignalized intersection should only be given after (1) less restrictive forms of traffic control have been utilized as the installation of a traffic signal often leads to an increased frequency of crashes (rear-end) on major roadways and introduces congestion and (2) signal warrants have been met. Refer to the CA MUTCD, Section 4C.01, Studies and Factors for Justifying Traffic Control Signals.

Why it works:

Traffic signals have the potential to reduce the most severe type crashes but will likely cause an increase in rear-end collisions. A reduction in overall injury severity is likely the largest benefit of traffic signal installation.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Typical traffic signal costs fall in the medium to high category and are affected by application, type of signal and right-of-away considerations. Projects of this magnitude should only be considered after alternate and lesser means of correction have been evaluated. Some locations can result in high B/C ratios, but due to higher costs, these projects often result in medium to low B/C ratios.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 0 - 74% NS04, Convert intersection to roundabout (from all way stop) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All Varies 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection and/or influence area of the new control.

The benefit of this CM is calculated using Caltrans procedure. The CRF is dependent on the ADT, project location (Rural/Urban) and the roundabout type (1 lane or 2 lanes). The benefit comes from both the reduction in the number and the severity of the crashes.

General information
Where to use:

Intersections that have a high frequency of right-angle and left-turn type crashes. Whether such intersections have existing crash patterns or not, a roundabout provides an alternative to signalization. The primary target locations for roundabouts should be moderate-volume unsignalized intersections. Roundabouts may not be a viable alternative in many suburban and urban settings where right-of-way is limited.

Why it works:

Roundabouts provide an important alternative to signalized and all-way stop-controlled intersections. Modern roundabouts differ from traditional traffic circles in that they operate in such a manner that traffic entering the roundabout must yield the right-of-way to traffic already in it. Roundabouts can serve moderate traffic volumes with less delay than all-way stop-controlled intersections and provide fewer conflict points. Crashes at roundabouts tend to be less severe because of the speed constraints and elimination of left-turn and right-angle movements.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Construction of roundabouts are usually relatively costly and major projects, requiring the environmental process, right-of-way acquisition, and implementation under an agency’s long-term capital improvement program. (For this reason, roundabouts may not be appropriate for California's Federal Safety Programs that have relatively short delivery requirements.) Even with roundabouts higher costs, they still can have a relatively high effectiveness.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Left-turn, Angle CRF: 12 - 78 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 59

EXHIBIT A
278

NS05, Convert intersection to roundabout (from 2-way stop or Yield control) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All Varies 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection and/or influence area of the new control.

General information
Where to use:

Why it works:

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Left-turn, Angle CRF: 12 - 78 % NS05mr, Convert intersection to mini-roundabout
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection and/or influence area of the new control.

General information
Where to use:

Mini-roundabouts are characterized by a small diameter (45-90 ft) and traversable islands (central island and splitter islands).

Mini-roundabouts offer most of the benefits of regular roundabouts with the added benefit of a smaller footprint. They are best suited to environments where speeds are already low and environmental constraints would preclude the use of a larger roundabout. Mini-roundabouts are most effective in lower speed environments in which all approaching roadways have posted speed of 30 mph or less and an 85th-percentile speed of less than 35 mph near the proposed yield and/or entrance line. For any location with an 85th-percentile speed above 35 mph, the mini-roundabout can be included as part of a broader system of traffic calming measures to achieve an appropriate speed environment.

Why it works:

Mini-roundabouts may be an optimal solution for a safety or operational issue at an existing intersection where there is insufficient right-of-way for a standard roundabout installation. The benefits of mini-roundabouts are the compact size, operational efficiency, traffic safety improvement and traffic Calming.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Construction costs for mini-roundabouts vary widely depending upon the extent of sidewalk modifications or other geometric improvements and the types of materials used. In most cases, mini-roundabouts have been installed with little or no pavement widening and with only minor changes to curbs and sidewalks. Construction costs can be minimum for an installation consisting entirely of pavement markings and signage or moderate for mini-roundabouts that include raised islands and pedestrian improvements.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: NA CRF: NA 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 60

EXHIBIT A
279

NS06, Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the influence area of the new signs. The influence area must be determined on a location by location basis.

General information
Where to use:

The target for this strategy should be approaches to unsignalized intersections with patterns of rear-end, right-angle, or turning collisions related to lack of driver awareness of the presence of the intersection.

Why it works:

The visibility of intersections and, thus, the ability of approaching drivers to perceive them can be enhanced by installing larger regulatory and warning signs at or prior to intersections. A key to success in applying this strategy is to select a combination of regulatory and warning sign techniques appropriate for the conditions on a particular unsignalized intersection approach.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 11 - 55% NS07, Upgrade intersection pavement markings (NS.I.)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new pavement markings. This CM is not intended to be used for general maintenance activities (i.e. the replacement of existing pavement markings in-kind) and must include upgraded safety features over the existing pavement markings and striping.

General information
Where to use:

Unsignalized intersections that are not clearly visible to approaching motorists, particularly approaching motorists on the major road. The strategy is particularly appropriate for intersections with patterns of rear-end, right-angle, or turning crashes related to lack of driver awareness of the presence of the intersection. Also at minor road approaches where conditions allow the stop bar to be seen by an approaching driver at a significant distance from the intersection. Typical improvements include "Stop Ahead" markings and the addition of Centerlines and Stop Bars.

Why it works:

The visibility of intersections and, thus, the ability of approaching drivers to perceive them can be enhanced by installing appropriate pavement delineation in advance of and at intersections will provide approaching motorists with additional information at these locations. Providing visible stop bars on minor road approaches to unsignalized intersections can help direct the attention of drivers to the presence of the intersection. Drivers should be more aware that the intersection is coming up, and therefore make safer decisions as they approach the intersection.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Pavement marking improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number of markings. When considered at a single location, these low cost improvements are usually funded through local funding by local maintenance crews. However, This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations, resulting in moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding. Note: When federal safety funding is used for these installations in high-wear-locations, the local agency is expected to maintain the improvement for a minimum of 10 years.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 13 - 60% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 61

EXHIBIT A
280

NS08, Install Flashing Beacons at Stop-Controlled Intersections For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the stop-controlled approaches / influence area of the new beacons.

General information
Where to use:

Flashing beacons can reinforce driver awareness of the Non-Signalized intersection control and can help mitigate patterns of right-angle crashes related to stop sign violations. Post-mounted advanced flashing beacons or overhead flashing beacons can be used at stop-controlled intersections to supplement and call driver attention to stop signs.

Why it works:

Flashing beacons provide a visible signal to the presence of an intersection and can be very effective in rural areas where there may be long stretches between intersections as well as locations where night-time visibility of intersections is an issue.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Flashing beacons can be constructed with minimal design, environmental and right-of-way issues and have relatively low costs.

Before choosing this CM, the agency needs to confirm the ability to provide power to the site (solar may be an option). In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Angle, Rear-End CRF: 5-34% NS09, Install flashing beacons as advance warning (NS.I.) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new beacons placed in advance of the intersection.

General information
Where to use:

Non-Signalized Intersections with patterns of crashes that could be related to lack of a driver's awareness of approaching intersection or controls at a downstream intersection.

Why it works:

Advance flashing beacons can be used to supplement and call driver attention to intersection control signs. Flashing beacons are intended to reinforce driver awareness of the stop or yield signs and to help mitigate patterns of crashes related to intersection regulatory sign violations. Most advance warning flashing beacons can be powered by solar, thus reducing the issues relating to power source.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Use of flashing beacons requires minimal development process, allowing flashing beacons to be installed within a short time period. Before choosing this CM, the agency needs to confirm the ability to provide power to the site (solar may be an option).

In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Angle, Rear-End CRF: 36 - 62% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 62

EXHIBIT A
281

NS10, Install transverse rumble strips on approaches
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 20% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new rumble strips.

General information
Where to use:

Transverse rumble strips are installed in the travel lane for the purposes of providing an auditory and tactile sensation for each motorist approaching the intersection. They can be used at any stop or yield approach intersection, often in combination with advance signing to warn of the intersection ahead. Due to the noise generated by vehicles driving over the rumble strips, care must be taken to minimize disruption to nearby residences and businesses.

Why it works:

When motorists are traveling along the roadway, they are sometimes unaware they are approaching an intersection. This is especially true on rural roads, as there may be fewer clues indicating an intersection ahead. Transverse rumble strips warn motorists that something unexpected is ahead that they need to pay attention to.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Use of transverse rumble strips requires minimal development process, allowing transverse rumble strips to be installed within a short time period. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach, although care should be taken to not over-use this CM. Note: When federal safety funding is used for these installations in high-wearlocations, the local agency is expected to maintain the improvement for a minimum of 10 years.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 0 - 35% NS11, Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 20% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the significantly improved new sight distance. Minor/incidental improvements to sight distance would not likely result in the CRF shown below.

General information
Where to use:

Unsignalized intersections with restricted sight distance and patterns of crashes related to lack of sight distance where sight distance can be improved by clearing roadside obstructions without major reconstruction of the roadway.

Why it works:

Adequate sight distance for drivers at stop or yield-controlled approaches to intersections has long been recognized as among the most important factors contributing to overall safety at unsignalized intersections. By removing sight distance restrictions (e.g., vegetation, parked vehicles, signs, buildings) from the sight triangles at stop or yield-controlled intersection approaches, drivers will be able see approaching vehicles on the main line, without obstruction and therefore make better decisions about entering the intersection safely.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Projects involving clearing sight obstructions on the highway right-of-way can typically be accomplished quickly, assuming the objects are readily moveable. Clearing sight obstructions on private property requires more time for discussions with the property owner. Costs will generally be low, assuming that in most cases the objects to be removed are within the right-of-way.

In general, this CMs can be very effective and can be implemented by agencies' maintenance staff and/or implemented on a systematic approach. Usually only high-cost removals would be good candidates for Caltrans Federal Safety Funding. Note:

When federal safety funding is used to remove vegetation that has the potential to grow back, the local agency is expected to maintain the improvement for a minimum of 10 years.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 11 - 56% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 63

EXHIBIT A
282

NS12, Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 55% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the improved friction overlay. This CM is not intended to apply to standard chip-seal or open-graded maintenance projects for long segments of corridors or structure repaving projects intended to fix failed pavement.

General information
Where to use:

Nationally, this countermeasure is referred to as "High Friction Surface Treatments" or HFST. Non-signalized Intersections noted as having crashes on wet pavements or under dry conditions when the pavement friction available is significantly less than needed for the actual roadway approach speeds. This treatment is intended to target locations where skidding and failure to stop is determined to be a problem in wet or dry conditions and the target vehicle is unable to stop due to insufficient skid resistance.

Why it works:

Improving the skid resistance at locations with high frequencies of wet-road crashes and/or failure to stop crashes can result in reductions of 50 percent for wet-road crashes and 20 percent for total crashes. Applying HFST can double friction numbers, e.g. low 40s to high 80s. This CM represents a special focus area for both FHWA and Caltrans, which means there are extra resources available for agencies interested in more details on High Friction Surface Treatment projects.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

This strategy can be relatively inexpensive and implemented in a short timeframe. The installation would be done by either agency personnel or contractors and can be done by hand or machine. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Wet, Night, ALL CRF: 10 - 62 % NS13, Install splitter-islands on the minor road approaches For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 40% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new splitter island on the minor road approaches.

General information
Where to use:

Minor road approaches to unsignalized intersections where the presence of the intersection or the stop sign is not readily visible to approaching motorists. The strategy is particularly appropriate for intersections where the speeds on the minor road are high. In creation of a splitter island allows for an additional stop sign to be placed in the median for the minor approach.

Why it works:

The installation of splitter islands allows for the addition of a stop sign in the median to make the intersection more conspicuous. Additionally, the splitter island on the minor-road provides for a positive separation between turning vehicles on the through road and vehicles stopped on the minor road approach.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Splitter islands at non-signalized intersections can usually be installed with minimal roadway reconstruction and relatively quickly. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Angle, Rear-End CRF: 35 - 100 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 64

EXHIBIT A
283

NS14, Install raised median on approaches (NS.I.)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new raised median. All new raised medians funded with federal HSIP funding should not include the removal of the existing roadway structural section and should be doweled into the existing roadway surface. This requirement is being implemented to maximize the safety-effectiveness of the limited HSIP funding and to minimize project impacts. Landscaping, if included in the project, is considered nonparticipating.

General information
Where to use:

Where related or nearby turning movements affect the safety and operation of an intersection. Effective access management is key to improving safety at, and adjacent to, intersections. The number of intersection access points coupled with the speed differential between vehicles traveling along the roadway often contributes to crashes. Any access points within 250 feet upstream and downstream of an intersection are generally undesirable.

Why it works:

Raised medians with left-turn lanes at intersections offer a cost-effective means for reducing crashes and improving operations at higher volume intersections. The raised medians also prohibit left turns into and out of driveways that may be located too close to the functional area of the intersection.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Raised medians at intersections may be most effective in retrofit situations where high volumes of turning vehicles have degraded operations and safety, and where more extensive approaches would be too expensive because of limited right-of-way and the constraints of the built environment. Because raised medians limit property access to right turns only, the need for providing alternative access ways should be considered. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach. When agencies opt to install landscaping in conjunction with new raised medians, the portion of the cost for landscaping and other non-safety related items that exceeds 10% of the project total cost is not federally participated and must be funded by the applicant.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 20 - 39 % NS15, Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (NS.I.) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 50% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection / influence area of the new directional openings.

General information
Where to use:

Crashes related to turning maneuvers include angle, rear-end, pedestrian, and sideswipe (involving opposing left turns) type crashes. If any of these crash types are an issue at an intersection, restriction or elimination of the turning maneuver may be the best way to improve the safety of the intersection. Because raised medians limit property access to right turns only, they should be used in conjunction with efforts to provide alternative access ways and promote driveway spacing objectives.

Why it works:

Agencies are increasingly using access management techniques on urban and suburban arterials to manage the number of conflicts experienced at an intersection. A key element of access management is to restrict certain movements, create directional median openings, or close median openings that are deemed too close to an intersection.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Turn prohibitions that are implemented by closing a median opening can usually be implemented quickly. Costs are highly variable but in many cases could be considered low. In some cases this strategy may involve acquiring access or constructing replacement access; those actions will significantly increase the cost of the project. Impacts to businesses and other land uses must be considered and controversy can delay the implementation. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 51% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 65

EXHIBIT A
284

NS16, Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (NS.I.)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 50% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring in the intersection / influence area of the new Reduced Left-Turn Conflict.

General information
Where to use and Why it works:

Reduced left-turn conflict intersections are geometric designs that alter how left-turn movements occur in order to simplify decisions and minimize the potential for related crashes. Two highly effective designs that rely on U-turns to complete certain left-turn movements are known as the restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) and the median U-turn (MUT).

Restricted Crossing U-turn (RCUT):

The RCUT intersection modifies the direct left-turn and through movements from cross-street approaches. Minor road traffic makes a right turn followed by a U-turn at a designated location (either signalized or unsignalized) to continue in the desired direction.

The RCUT is suitable for a variety of circumstances, including along rural, high-speed, four-lane, divided highways or signalized routes. It also can be used as an alternative to signalization or constructing an interchange. RCUTs work well when consistently used along a corridor, but also can be used effectively at individual intersections.

Median U-turn (MUT)
The MUT intersection modifies direct left turns from the major approaches. Vehicles proceed through the main intersection, make a U-turn a short distance downstream, followed by a right turn at the main intersection. The U-turns can also be used for modifying the cross-street left turns.

The MUT is an excellent choice for heavily traveled intersections with moderate left-turn volumes. When implemented at multiple intersections along a corridor, the efficient two-phase signal operation of the MUT can reduce delay, improve travel times, and create more crossing opportunities for pedestrians and bicyclists.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Implementing this strategy may take from months to years, depending on whether additional R/W is required. Such projects require a substantial time for development and construction. Costs are highly variable and range from very low to high. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Angle/Left-turn/RearEnd/All CRF: 34.8-100% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 66

EXHIBIT A
285

NS17, Install right-turn lane (NS.I.)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 20% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new right-turn lanes. This CM is not eligible for use at existing all-way stop intersections.

General information
Where to use:

Many collisions at unsignalized intersections are related to right-turn maneuvers. A key strategy for minimizing such collisions is to provide exclusive right-turn lanes, particularly on high-volume and high-speed major-road approaches. When considering new right-turn lanes, potential impacts to non-motorized users should be considered and mitigated as appropriate. When considering new right-turn lanes, potential impacts to non-motorized users should be considered and mitigated as appropriate.

Why it works:

The strategy is targeted to reduce the frequency of rear-end collisions resulting from conflicts between vehicles turning right and following vehicles and vehicles turning right and through vehicles coming from the left on the cross street. Right-turn lanes also remove slow vehicles that are decelerating to turn right from the through-traffic stream, thus reducing the potential for rear-end collisions. Right-turn lanes can increase the length of the intersection crossing and create an additional potential conflict point for non-motorized users.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Implementing this strategy may take from months to years. At some locations, right-turn lanes can be quickly and simply installed by restriping the roadway. At other locations, widening of the roadway, acquisition of additional right-of-way, and extensive environmental processes may be needed. Such projects require a substantial time for development and construction.

Costs are highly variable and range from very low to high. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 14 - 26 % NS18, Install left-turn lane (where no left-turn lane exists) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring on the approaches / influence area of the new left-turn lanes. This CM does NOT apply to converting a single-left into double-left turn. This CM is not eligible for use at existing all-way stop intersections.

General information
Where to use:

Many collisions at unsignalized intersections are related to left-turn maneuvers. A key strategy for minimizing such collisions is to provide exclusive left-turn lanes, particularly on high-volume and high-speed major-road approaches. When considering new left-turn lanes, potential impacts to non-motorized users should be considered and mitigated as appropriate.

Why it works:

Adding left-turn lanes remove vehicles waiting to turn left from the through-traffic stream, thus reducing the potential for rearend collisions. Because they provide a sheltered location for drivers to wait for a gap in opposing traffic, left-turn lanes may encourage drivers to be more selective in choosing a gap to complete the left-turn maneuver. This strategy may reduce the potential for collisions between left-turn and opposing through vehicles.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Implementing this strategy may take from months to years. At some locations, left-turn lanes can be quickly and simply installed by restriping the roadway. At other locations, widening of the roadway, acquisition of additional right-of-way, and extensive environmental processes may be needed. Such projects require a substantial time for development and construction. Costs are highly variable and range from very low to high. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 9 -55 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 67

EXHIBIT A
286

NS19PB, Install raised medians (refuge islands)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 45% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the crossing with the new islands. All new raised medians funded with federal HSIP funding should not include the removal of the existing roadway structural section and should be doweled into the existing roadway surface. This requirement is being implemented to maximize the safety-effectiveness of the limited HSIP funding and to minimize project impacts. Landscaping, if included in the project, is considered non-participating.

General information
Where to use:

Intersections that have a long pedestrian crossing distance, a higher number of pedestrians, or a crash history. Raised medians decrease the level of exposure for pedestrians and allow pedestrians to concentrate on (or cross) only one direction of traffic at a time.

Why it works:

Raised pedestrian refuge islands, or medians at crossing locations along roadways, are another strategy to reduce exposure between pedestrians and motor vehicles. Refuge islands and medians that are raised (i.e., not just painted) provide pedestrians more secure places of refuge during the street crossing. They can stop partway across the street and wait for an adequate gap in traffic before completing their crossing.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Median and pedestrian refuge areas are a low-cost countermeasure to implement. This cost can be applied to retrofit improvements or if it is a new construction project, implementing this countermeasure is even more cost-effective. In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach. When agencies opt to install landscaping in conjunction with new raised medians, the portion of the cost for landscaping and other non-safety related items that exceeds 10% of the project total cost is not federally participated and must be funded by the applicant.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian and Bicycle CRF: 30 - 56 % NS20PB, Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (signs and markings only) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 25% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the intersection/crossing with the new crossing. This CM is not intended to be used for high-cost aesthetic enhancements to intersection crosswalks (i.e. stamped concrete or stamped asphalt).

General information
Where to use:

Non-signalized intersections without a marked crossing, where pedestrians are known to be crossing intersections that involve significant vehicular traffic. They are especially important at school crossings and intersections with right and/or left turns pockets. See Zegeer study (Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations) for additional guidance regarding when to install a marked crosswalk.

Why it works:

Adding pedestrian crossings has the opportunity to enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being problematic. Pavement markings delineate a portion of the roadway that is designated for pedestrian crossing. These markings will often be different for controlled verses uncontrolled locations. The use of "ladder", "zebra" or other enhanced markings at uncontrolled crossings can increase both pedestrian and driver awareness to the increased exposure at the crossing. Incorporating advanced "stop" or “yield" markings provides an extra safety buffer and can be effective in reducing the 'multiple-threat' danger to pedestrians. Nearly one-third of all pedestrian-related crashes occur at or within 50 feet of an intersection. Of these, 30 percent may involve a turning vehicle. There are several types of pedestrian crosswalks, including:
continental, ladder, zebra, and standard. When agencies opt to install aesthetic enhancement to intersection crosswalks like stamped concrete/asphalt, the project design and construction costs can significantly increase. For HSIP applications, these costs must be accounted for in the B/C calculation, but these costs (over standard crosswalk markings) must be tracked separately and are not federally reimbursable and will increase the agency's local-funding share for the project costs.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs associated with this strategy will vary widely, depending upon if curb ramps and sidewalk modifications are required with the crossing. When considered at a single location, these low cost improvements are usually funded through local funding by local crews. However, This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations, resulting in moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian and Bicycle CRF: 25 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 68

EXHIBIT A
287

NS21PB, Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the new crossing (influence area) with enhanced safety features. This CM is not intended to be used for high-cost aesthetic enhancements to intersection crosswalks (i.e. stamped concrete or stamped asphalt).

General information
Where to use:

Non-signalized intersections where pedestrians are known to be crossing intersections that involve significant vehicular traffic.

They are especially important at school crossings and intersections with turn pockets. Based on the Zegeer study (Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations) at many locations, a marked crosswalk alone may not be sufficient to adequately protect non-motorized users. In these cases, flashing beacons, curb extensions, advanced "stop" or "yield" markings, and other safety features should be added to complement the standard crossing elements.

Why it works:

Adding pedestrian crossings that include enhances safety features has the opportunity to enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being especially problematic. The enhanced safety elements help delineate a portion of the roadway that is designated for pedestrian crossing. Incorporating advanced "yield" markings provide an extra safety buffer and can be effective in reducing the 'multiple-threat' danger to pedestrians. Nearly one-third of all pedestrian-related crashes occur at or within 50 feet of an intersection. When agencies opt to install aesthetic enhancement to intersection crosswalks like stamped concrete/asphalt, the project design and construction costs can significantly increase. For HSIP applications, these costs must be accounted for in the B/C calculation, but these costs (over standard crosswalk markings) must be tracked separately and are not federally reimbursable and will increase the agency's local-funding share for the project costs.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs associated with this strategy will vary widely, depending upon the types of enhanced features that will be combined with the standard crossing improvements. The need for new curb ramps and sidewalk modifications will also be a factor. This CM may be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with more than one location and can have relatively high B/C ratios based on past non-motorized crash history.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian and Bicycle CRF: 37% NS22PB, Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the influence area (expected to be a maximum of within 250') of the crossing which includes the RRFB.

General information
Where to use:

Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) includes pedestrian-activated flashing lights and additional signage that enhance the visibility of marked crosswalks and alert motorists to pedestrian crossings. It uses an irregular flash pattern that is similar to emergency flashers on police vehicles. RRFBs are installed at unsignalized intersections and mid-block pedestrian crossings.

Why it works:

RRFBs can enhance safety by increasing driver awareness of potential pedestrian conflicts and reducing crashes between vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized intersections and mid-block pedestrian crossings. The addition of RRFB may also increase the safety effectiveness of other treatments, such as crossing warning signs and markings.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

RRFBs are a lower cost alternative to traffic signals and hybrid signals. This CM can often be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 7 – 47.4% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 69

EXHIBIT A
288

NS23PB, Install Pedestrian Signal (including Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK)) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 55% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the intersection/crossing with the new signal.

For HAWK or other pedestrian signals, the justification may be Warrant 4, 5 and/or 7, or passing the test in Figure 4F-1/4F-2 in Chapter 4F of CA MUTCD. Please refer to Chapter 4F of CA MUTCD for more details
General information
Where to use:

Intersections noted as having a history of pedestrian vs. vehicle crashes and in areas where the likelihood of the pedestrian presence is high. Corridors should also be assessed to determine if there are adequate safe opportunities for non-motorists to cross and if a pedestrian signal, or a Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) (also called High-Intensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK)) are needed to provide an active warning to motorists when a pedestrian is in the crosswalk.

Why it works:

Adding a pedestrian signal has the opportunity to greatly enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being problematic.

Nearly one-third of all pedestrian-related crashes occur at or within 50 feet of an intersection. In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for non-motorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing pedestrians and cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths and signs and markings warning motorists of nonmotorized uses of the roadway that should be expected.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

The cost of improvements are generally high, but can vary dependent on the type of signal and overall scope of the project. In most cases the project duration can be short. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian and Bicycle CRF: 15 - 69% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 70

EXHIBIT A
289

B.3 Roadway Countermeasures
R01, Add Segment Lighting
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Night 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "night" crashes (all types) occurring within limits of the proposed roadway lighting 'engineered' area.

General information
Where to use:

Where to use: Noted substantial patterns of nighttime crashes. In particular, patterns of rear-end, right-angle, turning or roadway departure collisions on the roadways may indicate that night-time drivers can be unaware of the roadway characteristics.

Why it works:

Providing roadway lighting improves the safety during nighttime conditions by (1) making drivers more aware of the surroundings, which improves drivers' perception-reaction times, (2) enhancing drivers' available sight distances to perceive roadway characteristic in advance of the change, and (3) improving non-motorist's visibility and navigation.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

It expected that projects of this type may be constructed in a year or two and are relatively costly. There are several types of costs associated with providing lighting, including the cost of providing a permanent source of power to the location, the cost for the luminaire supports (i.e., poles), and the cost for routinely replacing the bulbs and maintenance of the luminaire supports.

Some locations can result in high B/C ratios, but due to higher costs, these projects often result in medium to low B/C ratios.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Night, All CRF: 18 - 69 % R02, Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new clear recovery zone (per Caltrans' HDM).

General information
Where to use:

Known locations or roadway segments prone to collisions with fixed objects such as utility poles, drainage structures, trees, and other fixed objects, such as the outside of a curve, end of lane drops, and in traffic islands. A clear recovery zone should be developed on every roadway, as space is available. In situations where public right-of-way is limited, steps should be taken to request assistance from property owners, as appropriate.

Why it works:

While this strategy does not prevent the vehicle leaving the roadway, it does provide a mechanism to reduce the severity of a resulting crash. A clear zone is an unobstructed, traversable roadside area that allows a driver to stop safely or regain control of a vehicle that has left the roadway. Removing or moving fixed objects, flattening slopes, or providing recovery areas reduces the likelihood of a crash.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Projects involving removing fixed objects from highway right-of-way can typically be accomplished quickly, assuming the objects are readily moveable. Clearing objects on private property requires more time for discussions with the property owner. Costs will generally be low, assuming that in most cases the objects to be removed are within the right-of-way. This CMs can be very effective and can be implemented by agencies' maintenance staff and/or implemented on a systematic approach. High-cost removals or removals implemented using a systematic approach would be good candidates for Caltrans Federal Safety Funding.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Fixed Object CRF: 17 - 100 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 71

EXHIBIT A
290

R03, Install Median Barrier
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: Note: For Caltrans' statewide Calls-for-Projects, this CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new barrier.

General information
Where to use:

Areas where crash history indicates drivers are unintentionally crossing the median and the cross-overs are resulting in high severity crashes. The installation of median barriers can increase the number of PDO and non-severe injuries. The net result in safety from this countermeasure is connected more to reducing the severity of crashes not the number of crashes. It is recommended to review the warrants as outlined in Chapter 7 of the Caltrans Traffic Manual when considering whether to install median barriers.

Why it works:

This strategy is designed to prevent head-on collisions by providing a barrier between opposing lanes of traffic. The variety of median barriers available makes it easier to choose a site-specific solution. The main advantage is the reduction of the severity of the crashes. The key to success would be in selecting an appropriate barrier based on the site, previous crash history, maintenance needs, and median width.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

This strategy would in many cases be possible to implement within a short period after site selection. Costs will vary depending on the type of median barrier selected and whether the strategy is implemented as a stand-alone project or incorporated as part of a reconstruction or resurfacing effort. Maintenance costs and worker exposure will also vary depending on the type of barrier selected. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head-on CRF: 0 - 94 % R04, Install Guardrail
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new guardrail. This CM is not intended to be used for general maintenance activities (i.e. the replacement of existing damaged rail).

For projects proposing to upgrade existing guardrail to current standards, this CM and corresponding CRF should only be applied to locations where past crash data or engineering judgment applied to the existing rail conditions suggests the upgraded guardrail may result in fewer or less severe crashes (justifying the use of the 25% CRF for this CM).

General information
Where to use:

Guardrail is installed to reduce the severity of lane departure crashes. However, guardrail can reduce crash severity only for those conditions where striking the guardrail is less severe than going down an embankment or striking a fixed object. Guardrail should only be installed where it is clear that crash severity will be reduced, or there is a history of run-off-the-road crashes at a given location that have resulted in severe crashes. New and upgraded guardrail and end-treatments must meet current safety standards; see Method for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) for more information. Caltrans (or other national accepted guidance) slope/height criteria need to be considered and documented.

Why it works:

Guardrail redirects a vehicle away from embankment slopes or fixed objects and dissipates the energy of an errant vehicle.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Strategies range from relatively inexpensive too costly. Costly projects may include those that upgrade existing guardrail applications to more semi-rigid and rigid barrier systems over extended distances. In general, this CMs can be effective and can be implemented by agencies' maintenance staff and/or implemented on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Fixed Object, Run-off Road CRF: 11 - 78 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 72

EXHIBIT A
291

R05, Install impact attenuators
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new attenuators. This CM is not intended to be used for general maintenance activities (i.e. the replacement of existing damaged attenuators). For projects proposing to upgrade existing attenuators to current standards, this CM and corresponding CRF should only be applied to locations where past crash data or engineering judgment applied to the existing attenuator conditions suggests the upgraded attenuators may result in fewer or less severe crashes (justifying the use of the 25% CRF for this CM).

General information
Where to use:

Impact attenuators are typically used to shield rigid roadside objects such as concrete barrier ends, steel guardrail ends and bridge pillars from oncoming automobiles. Attenuators should only be installed where it is impractical for the objects to be removed. New and upgraded barrier end-treatments must meet current safety standards; see MASH for more information.

Why it works:

Attenuators bring an errant vehicle to a more-controlled stop or redirect the vehicle away from a rigid object. Attenuators are effective at absorbing impact energy and increasing occupant safety. They also tend to draw attention to the fixed object, which helps drivers steer clear of the fixed objects.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs depending on the scope of the project, type(s) used, and associated ongoing maintenance costs. Time to install is fairly quick once site is identified.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Fixed Object, Run-off Road CRF: 5 - 50 % R06, Flatten side slopes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new side slopes. Minor/incidental flattening of side slopes would not likely result in the CRF shown below and may not be appropriate for use in Caltrans B/C calculations.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways experiencing frequent lane departure crashes that result in roll-over type crashes as a result of the roadway slope being so severe as to not accommodate a reasonable degree of driver correction. When there is a need to reduce the severity of lane departure crashes without installing a barrier system that could result in increased numbers of crashes.

Why it works:

Flattened slopes provide a greater area for a driver to regain control of a vehicle. Steep slopes, ditches or unprotected hazardous drops-offs adjacent to a travel lane offer little opportunities to correct an inappropriate action by a driver and can result in sever crashes.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Roadside modifications range from relatively inexpensive to very costly. Strategies that include creating safer side slopes where none exists can be moderately expensive based on the scope of the project and the associated clearing, grading, etc. The potential for high environmental and right-of-way impacts is high which can take several years to clear. In other cases This CM can be effective and can be implemented by agencies' maintenance staff and/or implemented on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Fixed Object, Run-off Road CRF: 5 - 62 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 73

EXHIBIT A
292

R07, Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 40% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of both the removed guardrail and the new side slopes.

General information
Where to use:

Locations where high number of crashes originate as a lane departure and result in collision with guardrail or a fixed object located on the side slope shielded by guardrail. The guardrail may or may not meet current standards. Even though guardrails are generally installed to reduce the severity of departure crashes, they still can result in severe crashes in some locations.

Why it works:

Flattened side slopes and an unobstructed clear zone provide a greater area for a driver to regain control of a vehicle. The existing guardrail may help protect the steep slopes, fixed objects, or unprotected hazardous drops-offs adjacent to a travel lane, but removing all of these obstacles generally improves safety.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Roll Over, Fixed Object CRF: 42% R08, Install raised median
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new raised median. All new raised medians funded with federal HSIP funding should not include the removal of the existing roadway structural section and should be doweled into the existing roadway surface. This requirement is being implemented to maximize the safety-effectiveness of the limited HSIP funding and to minimize project impacts. Landscaping, if included in the project, is considered non-participating.

General information
Where to use:

Areas experiencing head-on collisions that may be affected by both the number of vehicles that cross the centerline and by the speed of oncoming vehicles. Installing a raised median is a more restrictive approach in that it represents a more rigid barrier between opposing traffic. Application of raised medians on roadways with higher speeds is not advised - instead a median barrier should be considered. Including landscaping in new raised medians can be counterproductive to the HSIP safety goals and should only be done in ways that do not increase drivers’ exposure to fixed objects and that will maintain driver's sight distance needs throughout the life of the proposed landscaping. Agencies need to consider and document impacts of additional turning movements at nearby intersections.

Why it works:

Adding raised medians is a particularly effective strategy as it adds to or reallocates the existing cross section to incorporate a buffer between the opposing travel lanes and reinforces the limits of the travel lane. Raised median may also be used to limit unsafe turning movements along a roadway.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

In some cases this strategy may be a retrofit into the existing roadway by utilizing a portion of the existing paved shoulder.

These raised medians can be installed directly over the existing pavement. Cost and time to implement could significantly increase if the paved area is not sufficient to include a median. The surface treatment of the raised median also significantly affects their cost-effectiveness: standard concrete or other hardscape surfaces are usually more cost effective than landscaped medians. When agencies opt to install landscaping in conjunction with new raised medians, the project design and construction costs can significantly increase due to excavation, backfill/top-soil, water-connection, irrigation, planting, maintenance needed for the landscaping. When agencies opt to install landscaping in conjunction with new raised medians, the portion of the cost for landscaping and other non-safety related items that exceeds 10% of the project total cost is not federally participated and must be funded by the applicant.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head-on CRF: 20 - 75 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 74

EXHIBIT A
293

R09, Install median (flush)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new flush median. The new median must be a minimum of 4 feet wide (or "wider" if a narrow median exists before the proposed project).

General information
Where to use:

Areas experiencing head-on collisions that may be affected by both the number of vehicles that cross the centerline and by the speed of oncoming vehicles. Roadways with oversized lanes offer an opportunity to restripe the roadway to reduce the lanes to standard widths and use the extra width for the median.

Why it works:

Adding medians is a particularly effective strategy as it adds to or reallocates the existing cross section to incorporate a narrow buffer median between opposing flows, thereby providing a greater opportunity to correct an errant maneuver and further reinforce the limits of the travel lane. Application widths can vary based on the available cross section and intended application.

Additional safety can be provided by combining this CM with rumble strips.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 15 - 78 % R10PB, Install pedestrian median fencing
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring on the approaches/influence area of the new pedestrian median fencing.

General information
Where to use:

Roadway segments with high pedestrian-generators and pedestrian-destinations nearby (e.g. transit stops) may experience a high volume of pedestrians J-walking across the travel lanes at mid-block locations instead of walking to the nearest intersection or designated mid-block crossing. When this safety issue cannot be mitigated with shoulder, sidewalk and/or crossing treatments, then installing a continuous pedestrian barrier in the median may be a viable solution.

Why it works:

Adding pedestrian median fencing has the opportunity to enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being problematic involving pedestrians running/darting across the roadway outside designated pedestrian crossings. Pedestrian median fencing can significantly reduce this safety issue by creating a positive barrier, forcing pedestrians to the designated pedestrian crossing.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs associated with this strategy will vary widely depending on the type and placement of the median fencing. Impacts to transit and other land uses may need to be considered and controversy can delay the implementation. In general, this CM can be effective as a spot-location approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 25 - 40% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 75

EXHIBIT A
294

R11, Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new accel/decel lanes on high speed roadways. Significant improvements to the merge length for lane-drop locations is also an acceptable use of this CM.

General information
Where to use:

Areas proven to have crashes that are the result of drivers not being able to turn onto a high speed roadway to accelerate until the desired roadway speed is reached and areas that do not provide the opportunity to safety decelerate to negotiate a turning movement. This CM can also be used to improve the safety of merging vehicles at a lane-drop location.

Why it works:

A lane that does not provide enough deceleration length and storage space for turning traffic may cause the turn queue to back up into the adjacent through lane. This can contribute to rear-end and sideswipe crashes. An acceleration lane is an auxiliary or speed-change lane that allows vehicles to accelerate to highway speeds (high speed roadways) before entering the throughtraffic lanes of a highway. Additionally, if acceleration by entering traffic takes place directly on the traveled way, it may disrupt the flow of through-traffic and cause rear-end and sideswipe collisions.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs are highly variable. Where sufficient median or shoulder space exists it may be possible to provide acceleration/deceleration lanes at a moderate cost. Where the roadway must be widened and additional right-of-way must be acquired, higher costs and a lengthy time-to-construct are likely. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Sideswipe, Rear-End CRF: 10 - 75 % R12, Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: Note: For Caltrans' statewide Calls-for-Projects, this CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the widened lanes. Widening must a minimum of 1 foot.

General information
Where to use:

Horizontal curves or tangents and low speed or high speed roadways identified as having lane departure crashes, sideswipe or head-on crashes that can be attributed to an existing pavement width less than 10 feet.

Why it works:

Increasing pavement width can affect almost all crash types. A common practice is to widen the traveled way on horizontal curves to make operating conditions on curves comparable to those on tangents. Speed is a primary consideration when evaluating potential adverse impacts of lane width on safety. On high-speed, rural two-lane highways, an increased risk of cross-centerline head-on or cross-centerline sideswipe crashes is a concern because drivers may have more difficulty staying within the travel lane.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs will depend on the amount of reconstruction necessary and on whether additional right-of-way is required. In general, this is one of the higher-cost strategies recommended, but it can also be very beneficial. Since this is a relatively expensive treatment, one of the keys to creating a cost effective project with at least a medium B/C ratio is targeting higher-hazard roadways.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 5 - 70 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 76

EXHIBIT A
295

R13, Add two-way left-turn lane
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new lane, where an existing median did not already exist.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways having a high frequency of drivers being rear-ended while attempting to make a left turn across oncoming traffic.

Also can be effective for drivers crossing the centerline of an undivided multilane roadway inadvertently.

Why it works:

Two-way left-turn lanes provide a buffer between opposing directions of travel and separate left turning traffic from through traffic. They can also help to allow vehicles to begin to accelerate before entering the through-traffic lanes. They reduce the disruption of flow of through-traffic and reducing rear-end and sideswipe collisions. For some roadways the option of converting a four-lane undivided arterials to two-vehicle-lane roadways with a center left-turn lane and bike lanes should be considered (see "Road Diet" CM.)
General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

In some cases this strategy may be retrofitted into the existing roadway by utilizing a portion of the existing paved shoulder and can ultimately be as simple as restriping the roadway. Costs and time to implement could significantly increase if the paved area is not sufficient to include a median, requiring new right-of-way, and having significant environmental impacts. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location as the B/C ratios will vary from low to high.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 8 - 50 % R14, Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new lane striping. "Intersection" crashes can only be applied when they resulted from turning movements that had no designated turn lanes/phases in the existing condition and the Road Diet will provide turn lanes/phases for these movements. This CM does not apply to roadway sections that already included left turn lanes or two way left turn lanes before the lane reductions. New bike lanes are also expected to be part of these projects. if any pavement is planned to be removed for the purpose of adding landscaping, planterboxes, or other non-roadway user features, the cost should be non-participating.

General information
Where to use:

Areas noted as having a higher frequency of head-on, left-turn, and rear-end crashes with traffic volumes that can be handled by only 2 free flowing lanes. Using this strategy in locations with traffic volumes that are too high could result in diversion of traffic to routes less safe than the original four-lane design. It may also result in congestion levels that contribute to other crashes.

Why it works:

The application of this strategy usually reduces the roadway segment speeds and serious head-on crashes. In many cases the extra pavement width can be used for the installation of bike lanes. In addition to increasing bicycle safety, these bike lanes can improve the safety of on-street parking.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Implementation would require more time than in other low-cost treatments to complete environmental analyses, traffic studies and public input. Projects that only require new lane markings and minor signalization modifications will have relatively low cost and can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach. These striping and signal modification costs should be considered part of this CM and not an additional CM. (If additional signal hardware improvements are being made, over what is needed for the road diet, then the Improve Signal Hardware CM may also be used.) Often road diet projects need a seal-coat placed on the roadway to fully remove the old striping. These seal coats are considered part of the proper installation of this CM. In contrast, structural-overlays should not be considered part of this CM and are not considered eligible for funding in the California Local HSIP.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 26 - 43 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 77

EXHIBIT A
296

R15, Widen shoulder
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new paved shoulder. A minimum of 2 feet width must be added and the new/resulting shoulders must be a minimum of 4 feet wide. This CM is not eligible unless it is done as the last step of an "incremental approach", for which the agency documents that: 1) they have already pursued and installed lower cost and lower impact CMs (i.e. signing/striping upgrades to MUTCD standards/recommendations, rumble strips, etc.), 2) they have already monitored the crash occurrences after these improvements were installed, and 3) the 'after' crash rate is still unacceptably high. This 'incremental approach' (or a special exception from the HSIP program manager) must be documented in the Narrative Questions in the application and a summary of the 'before' and 'after' crash analysis must be attached to the application.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have a frequent incidence of vehicles leaving the travel lane resulting in an unsuccessful attempt to reenter the roadway. The probability of a safe recovery is increased if an errant vehicle is provided with an increased paved area in which to initiate such a recovery.

Why it works:

Based on the best available research, adding shoulder or widening an existing shoulder provides a greater area to regain control of a vehicle, as well as lateral clearance to roadside objects such as guardrail, signs and poles. They may also provide space for disabled vehicles to stop or drive slowly, provide increased sight distance for through vehicles and for vehicles entering the roadway, and in some cases reduce passing conflicts between motor vehicles and bicyclists and pedestrians. The likely safety benefits for adding or widening an existing shoulder generally increase as the widening width increases - practitioners should refer to NCHRP Report 500 Series, the CMF Clearinghouse or other references for more details.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Shoulder widening costs would depend on whether new right-of-way is required and whether extensive roadside modification is needed. Since shoulder widening can be a relatively expensive treatment, one of the keys to creating a cost effective project with at least a medium B/C ratio is targeting higher-hazard roadways.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Fixed Object, Run-off Road, Sideswipe CRF: 15 - 75 %
R16, Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 45% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits (or influence area) of the new shoulder widening at curves. A minimum of 2-4 feet width must be added to the outside of horizontal curves and the new traversable shoulder must be a minimum of 4 feet wide.

General information
Where to use:

Roadway curves noted as having frequent lane departure crashes due to inadequate or no shoulders, resulting in an unsuccessful attempt to reenter the roadway.

Why it works:

Adding shoulders (outside only) creates a recovery area in which a driver can regain control of a vehicle, as well as lateral clearance to roadside objects.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

To minimize the R/W needs and the cost, only outside shoulder at curves is to be widened. This CM can be implemented in a relatively short timeframe.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: NA
4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 78

EXHIBIT A
297

R17, Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves)
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 50% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits (or influence area) of the improved alignment. This CM is not eligible unless it is done as the last step of an "incremental approach", including: the agency documents that: 1) they have already pursued and installed lower cost and lower impact CMs (i.e. signing/striping upgrades to MUTCD standards/recommendations, rumble strips, etc.), 2) they have already monitored the crash occurrences after these improvements were installed, and 3) the 'after' crash rate is still unacceptably high. This 'incremental approach' (or a special exception from the HSIP program manager) must be documented in the Narrative Questions in the application and a summary of the agency's 'before' and 'after' crash analysis must be attached to the application.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways with horizontal curves that have experienced lane departure crashes as a result of a roadway segment having compound curves or a severe radius. This strategy should generally be considered only when less expensive strategies involving clearing of specific sight obstructions or modifying traffic control devices have been tried and have failed to ameliorate the crash patterns.

Why it works:

Increasing the radius of a horizontal curve can be very effective in improving the safety performance of the curve. Curve modification reduces the likelihood of a vehicle leaving its lane, crossing the roadway centerline, or leaving the roadway at a horizontal curve; and minimizes the adverse consequences of leaving the roadway. Horizontal alignment improvement projects are expected to include standard/improved superelevation elements, which should be considered part of this CM and not an additional CM.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

This strategy is a long-term, higher-cost alternative for improving the safety of a horizontal curve because it usually involves total reconstruction of the roadway. It may also require acquisition of additional right-of-way and an environmental review.

This strategy, albeit costly, has shown that increasing the radius of curvature can significantly reduce total curve-related crashes by up to 80 percent. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 24 - 90% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 79

EXHIBIT A
298

R18, Flatten crest vertical curve
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits (or influence area) of the improved alignment. This CM is not eligible unless it is done as the last step of an "incremental approach", including: the agency documents that: 1) they have already pursued and installed lower cost and lower impact CMs (i.e. signing/striping upgrades to MUTCD standards/recommendations, rumble strips, etc.), 2) they have already monitored the crash occurrences after these improvements were installed, and 3) the 'after' crash rate is still unacceptably high. This 'incremental approach' (or a special exception from the HSIP program manager) must be documented in the Narrative Questions in the application and a summary of the agency's 'before' and 'after' crash analysis must be attached to the application.

General information
Where to use:

The target for this strategy is usually unsignalized intersections with restricted sight distance due to vertical geometry and with patterns of crashes related to that lack of sight distance that cannot be ameliorated by less expensive methods. This strategy should generally be considered only when less expensive strategies involving clearing of specific sight obstructions or modifying traffic control devices have been tried and have failed to ameliorate the crash patterns.

Why it works:

Adequate sight distance for drivers at stopped approaches to intersections has long been recognized as among the most important factors contributing to overall intersection safety. Vertical alignment improvement projects are expected to include standard/improved superelevation elements, which should be considered part of this CM and not an additional CM.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Projects involving changing the horizontal and/or vertical alignment to provide more sight distance are quite extensive and usually take several years to accomplish. If additional right-of-way is required or environmental impacts are expected, these projects will require a substantial period of time. Since this is usually an expensive treatment, one of the keys to creating a cost effective project with at least a medium B/C ratio is targeting higher-hazard locations.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 20 - 51 % R19, Improve curve superelevation
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 45% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits (or influence area) of the improved superelevation. This CM does not apply to sections of roadways where the horizontal or vertical alignments are changing via another CM.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways noted as having frequent lane departure crashes and inadequate or no superelevation. Safety can be enhanced when the superelevation is improved or restored along curves where the actual superelevation is less than the optimal.

Why it works:

Superelevation works with friction between the tires and pavement to counteract the forces on the vehicle associated with cornering. Many curves may have inadequate superelevation because of vehicles traveling at higher speeds than were originally designed for, because of loss of effective superelevation after resurfacing, or because of changes in design policy after the curve was originally constructed.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

This strategy can be a higher-cost alternative for improving the safety of a curve because it involves reconstruction to some degree. Other projects may be able to be constructed by simple overlays and minimal reconstruction of roadways features.

When simple overlay fixes are pursued, a systematic installation approach may be appropriate. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Run-off Road, All CRF: 40 - 50 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 80

EXHIBIT A
299

R20, Convert from two-way to one-way traffic
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new one-way sections.

General information
Where to use:

One-way streets can offer improved signal timing and accommodate odd-spaced signals. One-way streets can simplify crossings for pedestrians, who must look for traffic in only one direction. While studies have shown that conversion of two-way streets to one-way generally reduces pedestrian crashes and the number of conflict points, one-way streets tend to have higher speeds which creates new problems. Care must be taken not to create conditions that cause driver confusion and erratic maneuvers.

Why it works:

Studies have shown a 10 to 50-percent reduction in total crashes after conversion of a two-way street to one-way operation.

While studies have shown that con-version of two-way streets to one-way generally reduces pedestrian crashes, one-way streets tend to have higher speeds which creates new problems. At the same time, this strategy (1) increases capacity significantly and (2) can have safety-related drawbacks including pedestrian confusion and minor sideswipe crashes.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

The costs will vary depending on length of treatment and if the conversion requires modification to signals. Conversion costs can be high to build "crossovers" where the one-way streets convert back to two-way streets and to rebuild traffic signals. It's also likely that these types of modifications will require public involvement and could significantly add to the time it takes to complete the project. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 26 - 43 % R21, Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 55% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the improved friction overlay. This CM is not intended to apply to standard chip-seal or open-graded maintenance projects for long segments of corridors or structure repaving projects intended to fix failed pavement.

General information
Where to use:

Nationally, this countermeasure is referred to as "High Friction Surface Treatments" or HFST. Areas as noted having crashes on wet pavements or under dry conditions when the pavement friction available is significantly less than actual roadway speeds; including but not limited to curves, loop ramps, intersections, and areas with short stopping or weaving distances. This treatment is intended to target locations where skidding is determined to be a problem, in wet or dry conditions and the target vehicle is one that runs (skids) off the road or is unable to stop due to insufficient skid resistance.

Why it works:

Improving the skid resistance at locations with high frequencies of wet-road crashes and/or failure to stop crashes can result in a reduction of 50 percent for wet-road crashes and 20 percent for total crashes. Applying HFST can double friction numbers, e.g. low 40s to high 80s. This CM represents a special focus area for both FHWA and Caltrans, which means there are extra resources available for agencies interested in more details on High Friction Surface Treatment projects.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Wet, Rear-End, All CRF: 17 - 68 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 81

EXHIBIT A
300

R22, Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new/upgraded signs. This CM is not intended for maintenance upgrades of street-name, parking, guide, or any other signs without a primary focus on roadway safety. This CM is not eligible unless it is done as part of a larger sign audit project, including the study of: 1) the existing signs' locations, sizes and information per MUTCD standards, 2) missing signs per MUTCD standards, and 3) sign retroreflectivity. The overall sign audit scope (or a special exception from the HSIP program manager) must be documented in the Narrative Questions in the application. Based on the scope of the project/audit, it may be appropriate to combine other CMs in the B/C calculation.

General information
Where to use:

The target for this strategy should be on roadway segments with patterns of head on, nighttime, non-intersection, run-off road, and sideswipe crashes related to lack of driver awareness of the presence of a specific roadway feature or regulatory requirement. Ideally this type of safety CM would be combined with other sign evaluations and upgrades (install chevrons, warning signs, delineators, markers, beacons, and relocation of existing signs per MUTCD standards.) Why it works:

This strategy primarily addresses crashes caused by lack of driver awareness (or compliance) roadway signing. It is intended to get the drivers attention and give them a visual warning by using fluorescent yellow sheeting (or other retroreflective material).

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Signing improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number of signs. When considered at a single location, these low cost improvements are usually funded through local funding by local maintenance crews. However, This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations, resulting in moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding. When considering any type of federally funded sign upgrade project, California local agencies are encouraged to consider "Roadway Safety Signing Audit (RSSA) and Upgrade Projects". Including RSSAs in the development phase of sign projects are expected to identify non-standard (per MUTCD) sign features and missing signs that may otherwise go unnoticed. More information on RSSA is available on the Local Assistance HSIP webpage.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head on, Run-off road, Sideswipe, Night CRF: 18 - 35%
4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 82

EXHIBIT A
301

R23, Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 40% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new signs. (i.e. only through the curve).

General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have an unacceptable level of crashes on relatively sharp curves during periods of light and darkness. Ideally this type of safety CM would be combined with other sign evaluations and upgrades (install warning signs, delineators, markers, beacons, and relocation of existing signs per MUTCD standards.) Why it works:

Post-mounted chevrons are intended to warn drivers of an approaching curve and provide tracking information and guidance to the drivers. While they are intended to act as a warning, it should also be remembered that the posts, placed along the roadside, represent a possible object with which an errant vehicle can crash into. Design of posts to minimize damage and injury is an important part of the considerations to be made when selecting these treatments.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Run-off Road, All CRF: 6 - 64 % R24, Install curve advance warning signs
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new signs. (i.e. only through the curve)
General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have an unacceptable level of crashes on relatively sharp curves during periods of light and darkness. This countermeasure may also include horizontal alignment and/or advisory speed warning signs. Ideally this type of safety CM would be combined with other sign evaluations and upgrades (install warning signs, chevrons, delineators, markers, beacons, and relocation of existing signs per MUTCD standards.)
Why it works:

This strategy primarily addresses problem curves, and serves as an advance warning of an unexpected or sharp curve. It provides advance information and gives drivers a visual warning that their added attention is needed.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Run-off Road, All CRF: 20 - 30 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 83

EXHIBIT A
302

R25, Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new signs. (i.e. only through the curve)
General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have an unacceptable level of crashes on relatively sharp curves. Flashing beacons in conjunction with warning signs should only be used on horizontal curves that have an established severe crash history to help maintain their effectiveness.

Why it works:

This strategy primarily addresses problem curves, and serves as an enhanced advance warning of an unexpected or sharp curve.

It provides advance information and gives drivers a visual warning that their added attention is needed. Flashing beacons are an added indication that a curve may be particularly challenging.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 30 % R26, Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 30% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the influence area of the new signs. (i.e. through the curve) {This CM does not apply to dynamic regulatory speed warning signs. There are currently no nationally accepted CRFs for dynamic regulatory signs (also known as Radar Speed Feedback Signs).

CRFs are being developed and Caltrans hopes to include these CMs and CRFs in future calls for projects.}
General information
Where to use:

Curvilinear roadways that have an unacceptable level of crashes due to excessive speeds on relatively sharp curves.

Why it works:

This strategy primarily addresses crashes caused by motorists traveling too fast around sharp curves. It is intended to get the drivers attention and give them a visual warning that they may be traveling over the recommended speed for the approaching curve. Care should be taken to limit the placement of these signs to help maintain their effectiveness.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Use of dynamic speed warning signs requires minimal development process, allowing them to be installed within a short time period. Before choosing this CM, the agency needs to confirm the ability to provide power to the site (solar may be an option).

In general, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 0 - 41 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 84

EXHIBIT A
303

R27, Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits / influence area of the new features. {This is not a striping-related CM}
General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have an unacceptable level of crashes on curves (relatively flat to sharp) during periods of light and darkness.

Any road with a history of fixed object crashes is a candidate for this treatment, as are roadways with similar fixed objects along the roadside that have yet to experience crashes. If a fixed object cannot be relocated or made break-away, placing an object marker can provide additional information to motorists. Ideally this type of safety CM would be combined with other sign evaluations and upgrades (install warning signs, chevrons, beacons, and relocation of existing signs per MUTCD standards.) Why it works:

Delineators, reflectors and/or object markers are intended to warn drivers of an approaching curve or fixed object that cannot easily be removed. They are intended to provide tracking information and guidance to the drivers. They are generally less costly than Chevron Signs as they don't require posts to place along the roadside, avoiding an additional object with which an errant vehicle can crash into.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

These improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number of locations. When considered at a single location, these low cost improvements are usually funded through local funding by local maintenance crews. However, This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations, resulting in low to moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding. When considering any type of federally funded sign upgrade project, California local agencies are encouraged to consider "Roadway Safety Signing Audit (RSSA) and Upgrade Projects". Including RSSAs in the development phase of sign projects are expected to identify non-standard (per MUTCD) sign features and missing signs that may otherwise go unnoticed. More information on RSSA is available on the Local Assistance HSIP webpage.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: All CRF: 0 - 30 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 85

EXHIBIT A
304

R28, Install edge-lines and centerlines
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 25% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new centerlines and/or edge-lines.

This CM is not intended to be used for general maintenance activities (i.e. the replacement of existing striping and RPMs in-kind) and must include upgraded safety features over the existing striping. For two lane roadways allowing passing, a striping audit must be done to ensure the passing limits meeting the MUTCD standards. Both the centerline and edge-lines are expected to be upgraded, unless prior approval is granted by Caltrans staff in writing and attached to application.

General information
Where to use:

Any road with a history of run-off-road right, head-on, opposite-direction-sideswipe, or run-off-road-left crashes is a candidate for this treatment - install where the existing lane delineation is not sufficient to assist the motorist in understanding the existing limits of the roadway. Depending on the width of the roadway, various combinations of edge line and/or center line pavement markings may be the most appropriate. Incorporating raised/reflective pavement markers (RPMs) into centerlines (and edge-lines) should be considered as it has been shown to improve safety.

Why it works:

Installing edge-lines and centerlines where none exists or making significant upgrades to existing lines (paint to thermoplastic, adding audible disks/bumps in the thermoplastic stripes, or adding RPMs) are intended/designed to help drivers who might leave the roadway because of their inability to see the edge of the roadway along the horizontal edge of the pavement or crossover the centerline of the roadway into oncoming traffic. New pavement marking products tend to be more durable, are allweather, more visible, and have a higher retroreflectivity than traditional pavement markings.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

These improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number and length of locations. This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous and long locations, resulting in low to moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding. When considering any type of federally funded striping upgrade project, California local agencies are encouraged to consider "Roadway Safety Striping Audit and Upgrade Projects".

Including wide-scale striping audits in the development phase of striping projects are expected to identify non-standard (per MUTCD) striping/marking features, no-passing zone limits needing adjustment, and missing striping/markings that may otherwise go unnoticed. More information on this concepts is available on the Local Assistance HSIP webpage under an RSSA example document. Note: When federal safety funding is used for these installations in high-wear-locations, the local agency is expected to maintain the improvement for a minimum of 10 years.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head-on, Run-off Road, All CRF: 0 - 44 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 86

EXHIBIT A
305

R29, Install no-passing line
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 45% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new or extended no-passing zones.

General information
Where to use:

Roadways that have a high percentage of head-on crashes suggesting that many head-on crashes may relate to failed passing maneuvers. No-passing lines should be installed where drivers "passing sight distance" is not available due to horizontal or vertical obstructions. General restriping projects can be good opportunities to reevaluate and incorporate new no-passing zones limits. The incorporation 'No Passing Zone' pennants should also be considered when reevaluating the limits of nopassing zones. Installing no-passing limits in areas that are not warranted may reduce the overall safety of the corridor as drivers may become frustrated and attempt passing maneuvers at other locations without the necessary sight distance.

Why it works:

When the centerline markings do not differentiate between passing and no-passing areas, drivers may have difficulty determining where passing maneuvers can be completed safely. Providing clear and engineered passing and no-passing areas can encourage drivers to wait patiently for safe passing areas and avoid aggressively looking for passing opportunities.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head-on, Side-swipe CRF: 40 - 53% R30, Install centerline rumble strips/stripes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 20% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new rumble strips/stripes.

General information
Where to use:

Center Line rumble strips/stripes can be used on virtually any roadway – especially those with a history of head-on crashes. It is recommended that rumble strips/stripes be applied systematically along an entire route instead of only at spot locations. For all rumble strips/stripes, pavement condition should be sufficient to accept milled rumble strips. Care should be taken when considering installing rumble strips in locations with residential land uses or in areas with high bicycle volumes.

Why it works:

Rumble strips provide an auditory indication and tactile rumble when driven on, alerting drivers that they are drifting out of their travel lane, giving them time to recover before they depart the roadway or cross the center line. Additionally, rumble stripes (pavement marking in the rumble itself) provide an enhanced marking, especially in wet dark conditions.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

These improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number and length of locations. This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous and long locations, resulting in moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Head-on, Side-swipe, All CRF: 15 - 68% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 87

EXHIBIT A
306

R31, Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% All 15% 10 years
Notes: This CM only applies to crashes occurring within the limits of the new rumble strips/stripes.

General information
Where to use:

Shoulder and edge line milled rumble strips/stripes should be used on roads with a history of roadway departure crashes. It is recommended that rumble strips/stripes be applied systematically along an entire route instead of only at spot locations. For all rumble strips/stripes, pavement condition should be sufficient to accept milled rumble strips. Special requirements may apply and care should be taken when considering installing rumble strips in locations with residential land uses or in areas with high bicycle volumes.

Why it works:

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

These improvements do not require a long development process and can typically be implemented quickly. Costs for implementing this strategy are nominal and depend on the number and length of locations. This CM can be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous and long locations, resulting in moderate cost projects that are more appropriate to seek state or federal funding.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Run-off Road CRF: 10 - 41% R32PB, Install bike lanes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring within the limits of the Class II (not Class III) bike lanes. When an off-street bike-path is proposed that is not adjacent to the roadway, the applicant must document the engineering judgment used to determine which "Ped & Bike" crashes to apply.

General information
Where to use:

Roadway segments noted as having crashes between bicycles and vehicles or crashes that may be preventable with a buffer/shoulder. Most studies suggest that bicycle lanes may provide protection against bicycle/motor vehicle collisions.

Striped bike lanes can be incorporated into a roadway when is desirable to delineate which available road space is for exclusive or preferential use by bicyclists.

Why it works:

Most studies present evidence that bicycle lanes provide protection against bicycle/motor vehicle collisions. Bicycle lanes provide marked areas for bicyclist to travel along the roadway and provide for more predictable movements for both bicyclist and motorist. Evidence also shows that riding with the flow of vehicular traffic reduces bicyclists’ chances of collision with a motor vehicle. Locations with bicycle lanes have lower rates of wrong-way riding. In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for non-motorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths and signs and markings warning motorists of non-motorized uses of the roadway that should be expected.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Adding striped bicycle lanes can range from the simply restriping the roadway and minor signing to projects that require roadway widening, right-of-way, and environmental impacts. It is most cost efficient to create bike lanes during street reconstruction, street resurfacing, or at the time of original construction. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location. For simple installation scenarios, This CM can be very effective and can be considered on a systematic approach.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 0 - 53 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 88

EXHIBIT A
307

R33PB, Install Separated Bike Lanes
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 45% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring within the limits of the separated bike lanes.

When an off-street bike-path is proposed that is not adjacent to the roadway, the applicant must document the engineering judgment used to determine which "Ped & Bike" crashes to apply.

General information
Where to use:

Separated bikeways are most appropriate on streets with high volumes of bike traffic and/or high bike-vehicle collisions, presumably in an urban or suburban area. Separation types range from simple, painted buffers and flexible delineators, to more substantial separation measures including raised curbs, grade separation, bollards, planters, and parking lanes. These options range in feasibility due to roadway characteristics, available space, and cost. In some cases, it may be possible to provide additional space in areas where pedestrian and bicyclists may interact, such as the parking buffer, or loading zones, or extra bike lane width for cyclists to pass one another.

Why it works:

Separated bike lanes provide increased safety and comfort for bicyclists beyond conventional bicycle lanes. By separating bicyclists from motor traffic, “protected” or physically separated bike lanes can offer a higher level of comfort and are attractive to a wider spectrum of the public. Intersections and approaches must be carefully designed to promote safety and facilitate leftturns for bicyclists from the primary corridor to cross street.

In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for non-motorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths and signs and markings warning motorists of non-motorized uses of the roadway that should be expected.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

The cost of Installing separated bike lanes can be low to medium or high, depending on whether roadway widening, right-ofway and environmental impacts are involved. It is most cost efficient to create bike lanes during street reconstruction, street resurfacing, or at the time of original construction. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 3.7 - 100 % R34PB, Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 80% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring within the limits of the new walkway. This CM is not intended to be used where an existing sidewalk is being replaced with a wider one, unless prior Caltrans approval is included in the application. When an off-street multi-use path is proposed that is not adjacent to the roadway, the applicant must document the engineering judgment used to determine which "Ped & Bike" crashes to apply.

General information
Where to use:

Areas noted as not having adequate or no sidewalks and a history of walking along roadway pedestrian crashes. In rural areas asphalt curbs and/or separated walkways may be appropriate.

Why it works:

Sidewalks and walkways provide people with space to travel within the public right-of-way that is separated from roadway vehicles. The presence of sidewalks on both sides of the street has been found to be related to significant reductions in the “walking along roadway” pedestrian crash risk compared to locations where no sidewalks or walkways exist. Reductions of 50 to 90 percent of these types of pedestrian crashes. In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for nonmotorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing pedestrians and cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths and signs and markings warning motorists of non-motorized uses of the roadway that should be expected.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):
4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 89

EXHIBIT A
308

Costs for sidewalks will vary, depending upon factors such as width, materials, and existing of curb, gutter and drainage.

Asphalt curbs and walkways are less expensive, but require more maintenance. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location. These projects can be very effective in areas of high-pedestrian volumes with a past history of crashes involving pedestrians.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 65 - 89 % R35PB, Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the influence area (expected to be a maximum of within 250') of the new crossing which includes new enhanced safety features. Note:

This CM is not intended to be combined with the "Install raised pedestrian crossing" when calculating the improvement's B/C ratio. This CM is not intended to be used for high-cost aesthetic enhancements (i.e. stamped concrete or stamped asphalt).

General information
Where to use:

Roadway segments with no controlled crossing for a significant distance in high-use midblock crossing areas and/or multilane roads locations. Based on the Zegeer study (Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations) at many locations, a marked crosswalk alone may not be sufficient to adequately protect non-motorized users. In these cases, flashing beacons, curb extensions, medians and pedestrian crossing islands and/or other safety features should be added to complement the standard crossing elements. For multi-lane roadways, advance "yield" markings can be effective in reducing the 'multiple-threat' danger to pedestrians.

Why it works:

Adding pedestrian crossings has the opportunity to greatly enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being problematic.

The enhanced safety elements, which may include curb extensions, medians and pedestrian crossing islands, beacons, and lighting, combined with pavement markings delineating a portion of the roadway that is designated for pedestrian crossing.

Care must be taken to warn drivers of the potential for pedestrians crossing the roadway and enhanced improvements added to the crossing increase the likelihood of pedestrians crossing in a safe manner. In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for non-motorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing pedestrians and cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths and signs. When agencies opt to install aesthetic enhancement to crossing like stamped concrete/asphalt, the project design and construction costs can significantly increase. For HSIP applications, these costs must be accounted for in the B/C calculation, but these costs (over standard crosswalk markings) must be tracked separately and are not federally reimbursable and will increase the agency's local-funding share for the project costs.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs associated with this strategy will vary widely, depending on the extent of the curb extensions, raised medians, flashing beacons, and other pedestrian safety elements that are needed with the crossing. When considered at a single location, these improvements can sometimes be low cost and funded through local funding by local crews. This CM can often be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations, resulting in moderate to high cost projects that are appropriate to seek state or federal funding.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 8 - 56% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 90

EXHIBIT A
309

R36PB, Install raised pedestrian crossing
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the area with the new raised crossing. Note:

This CM is not intended to be combined with the "Install pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features)" when calculating the improvement's B/C ratio.

General information
Where to use:

On lower-speed roadways, where pedestrians are known to be crossing roadways that involve significant vehicular traffic. Based on the Zegeer study (Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations) at many locations, a marked crosswalk alone, may not be sufficient to adequately protect non-motorized users. In these cases, raised crossings can be added to complement the standard crossing elements. Special requirements may apply and extra care should be taken when considering installing raised crossings to ensure unintended safety issues are not created, such as: emergency vehicle access or truck route issues.

Why it works:

Adding a raised pedestrian crossing has the opportunity to enhance pedestrian safety at locations noted as being especially problematic. The raised crossing encourages motorists to reduce their speed and provides improved delineation for the portion of the roadway that is designated for pedestrian crossing. In combination with this CM, better guidance signs and markings for non-motorized and motorized roadway users should be considered, including: sign and markings directing pedestrians and cyclists on appropriate/legal travel paths.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Costs associated with this strategy will vary widely, depending upon the elements of the raised crossing and the need for new curb ramps and sidewalk modifications. This CM may be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with more than one location and can have medium to high B/C ratios based on past non-motorized crash history.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 30 - 46% R37PB, Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Pedestrian and Bicycle 35% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "Ped & Bike" crashes occurring in the influence area (expected to be a maximum of within 250') of the crossing which includes the RRFB.

General information
Where to use:

Why it works:

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

RRFBs are a lower cost alternative to traffic signals and hybrid signals. This CM can often be effectively and efficiently implemented using a systematic approach with numerous locations.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Pedestrian, Bicycle CRF: 7 – 47.4% 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 91

EXHIBIT A
310

R38, Install Animal Fencing
For HSIP Cycle 11 Call-for-projects
Funding Eligibility Crash Types Addressed CRF Expected Life 90% Animal 80% 20 years
Notes: This CM only applies to "animal" crashes occurring within the limits of the new fencing.

General information
Where to use:

At locations with high percent of vehicular/animal crashes (reactive) or where there is a known high percent of animals crossing due to migratory patterns (proactive).

Why it works:

Animal fencing helps to channelize the identified animals to a natural or man-made crossing, eliminating the conflict between vehicles and animals on the same place. Animal fencing is typically installed at a bridge location with its "run of need" dependent on the surrounding terrain.

General Qualities (Time, Cost and Effectiveness):

Time to install fencing can be moderate to lengthy depending on the environmental commitments and agreed upon solution to mitigating project impacts. Costs will be fairly low and depend on the "run of need" length. There will be minimal reoccurring maintenance costs on keeping the fence intact. The expected effectiveness of this CM must be assessed for each individual location.

FHWA CMF Clearinghouse: Crash Types Addressed: Animal CRF: 70 - 90 % 4/8/2022 Local Roadway Safety P a g e | 92

EXHIBIT A
311
89 | P a g e L i v e r m o r e R o a d w a y S a f e t y P l a n

APPENDIX F: HSIP ANALYZERS

EXHIBIT A
312
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

HSIP ANALYZER (for BCR Applications)
Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) Calculation
for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Application Important: Review and follow the step-by-step instructions in the HSIP Analyzer Manual. Completing the HSIP Analyzer without referencing to the manual may result in an application with fatal flaws that will be disqualified from the ranking and selection process.

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Improve safety at Signalized Intersection: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow or operation)
Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
First St and Southfront Rd, E Stanley Blvd and Murrieta Blvd, Railroad Ave and S P St, First St and Maple St, Northfront Road and North Vasco Road, Portola Avenue and N L St Project Location:
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: 6 Number of Non-signalized Intersections: 0 Miles of Roadways*: *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
313
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Other Principal Arterial
Urban
0%
Intersections Lane Departures Pedestrians Bicyclists
Emergency Response Emerging Technologies Work Zones Speed Management/ Aggressive Driving
100%
Motorized users
Jurisdiction-wide safety analysis
LRSP
Systemic
Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal
Posted Speed Limit (mph): Varies
AADT (Major Road) AADT (Minor Road) Year of AADT 2019
Annual Average Daily Traffic (see instructions):

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

Which of the California's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas does the project address primarily? Multiple Challenge Areas may be checked. For example, if this project is for pedestrian safety at intersections, both "Intersections" and "Pedestrians" should be checked. For more information on the SHSP and its Challenge Areas, click here.

How were the safety needs and potential countermeasures for this project first identified? California established Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP) in 2016 and Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Program in 2019. Was this project identified through the SSARP or LRSP? Is the project focused primarily on “spot location(s)” or “systemic” improvements? If it is systemic, the primary type of the "systemic" improvements is:

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
314
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Will this project use HSIP funds for Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase? Will an external consultant be hired to do the PE work? Yes
Yes
Delivery Milestones to be met: PE Authorization by 9/30/2023; CON Authorization by 6/30/2026.

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

Section II: Project Schedule
The local agency is expected to deliver the project per the HSIP Program Delivery requirements. Assuming the HSIP Cycle 11 projects selected for funding will be programmed by January 1, 2023, please enter your best estimated dates for the following implementation milestones. Leave blank if not applicable.

EXHIBIT A
315
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section III. Safety Countermeasures, Crash Data and Project Benefit Calculation The benefit of an HSIP safety project is achieved by reducing potential future crashes due to the application of the safety countermeasures (CMs). In this section, you will need to provide information regarding the historical crash data at the project sites.

Different CMs will reduce crashes of different types during the life of the safety improvements. Depending on the selected CMs for the application, you will be required to fill in one or more crash data tables, for any combination of the five crash types (datasets): "All" , "Night" , Ped & Bike", "Emergency Vehicle", and "Animal" (Each of the later four datasets is a sub-dataset of the "All" dataset.) Note: If a Roundabout CM (S16 or NS04 or NS05) is selected, additional information (such as roundabout configuration and ADT) is required.

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

1. Please indicate the sources of the crash data. Typical sources include Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS, your locally preferred mapping software (such as Crossroads) or any other data sources.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

Countermeasure R15 (Widen shoulder), R16 ( Curve shoulder widening (outside only)), R17 (Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves)) and R18 (Flatten crest vertical curve) are not eligible unless they are done as the last step of an "incremental approach".

Applicants need to document they have already installed lower cost and lower impact CMs but the crash rate is unacceptably high. What safety improvements have been pursued and installed at the project sites within the last ten years?

EXHIBIT A
316
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 1: Select safety countermeasures
Does this application include Signalized Intersections (SI)? Yes Does this application include Non-signalized Intersections (NS)? No Does this application include Roadway Segments (R)? No
* Normally a BCR application only includes locations of one of the above 3 categories (SI, NS or R). Multiple categories may be selected if the application proposes corridor safety improvements or uses a systemic approach, or the applicant chooses to bundle multiple locations in the same vicinity together.

Signalized Intersections (SI):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 S01: Add intersection lighting (S.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 S02: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)
✔ 3 S03: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=50%) 4 S05: Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems (CRF=0.7 for Emergency vehicle crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 5 S06: Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 S07: Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 S08: Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 S09: Install raised pavement markers and striping (through intersection) (CRF=0.1 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 9 S10: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 10 S11: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 S12: Install raised median on approaches (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 S13PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 S14: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 S15: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 S16: Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 S17PB: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 S18PB: Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 S19PB: Pedestrian Scramble (CRF=0.4 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 S20PB: Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) (CRF=0.15 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 20 S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) (CRF=0.6 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
317
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 2: Click to generate table for project locations, enter the project locations and select countermeasures for each location. If any of the selections have been changed, you must re-click the below button to refresh.

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Signalized Intersections)
6 S03
+
- SI_1 First St and Southfront Rd ●
+
- SI_2 E Stanley Blvd and Murrieta Blvd ●
+
- SI_3 Railroad Ave and S P St ●
+
- SI_4 First St and Maple St ●
+
- SI_5 Northfront Road and North Vasco Road ●
+
- SI_6 Portola Ave and N L St ●

EXHIBIT A
318
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Based on the countermeasures selected in Step 2 , the crash data types to be provided are:
from (MM/DD/YYYY): 01/01/2015 To (MM/DD/YYYY): 12/31/2019 Crash Data Period (years) = 5 Fill out the crash data table(s) for the crash type(s) as required by the selected countermeasure(s) in Step 2.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: ALL
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(ALL)
Severe
Injury (ALL)
Other Visible
Injury (ALL)
Complaint
of Pain
(ALL)
PDO
(ALL) Total ID
1 SI_1: First St and Southfront Rd 0 1 2 12 0 15
2 SI_2: E Stanley Blvd and
Murrieta Blvd 0 1 3 5 0 9
3 SI_3: Railroad Ave and S P St 0 1 4 6 0 11
4 SI_4: First St and Maple St 0 1 1 0 0 2
5 SI_5: Northfront Road and
North Vasco Road 0 0 1 4 0 5
6 SI_6: Portola Ave and N L St 0 1 2 2 0 5
Total 0 5 13 29 0 47

EXHIBIT A
319
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation

Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit SI_1: First St and Southfront Rd $959,281 $0 $0 $959,281 SI_2: E Stanley Blvd and Murrieta
Blvd $816,361 $0 $0 $816,361
SI_3: Railroad Ave and S P St $891,601 $0 $0 $891,601
SI_4: First St and Maple St $584,071 $0 $0 $584,071
SI_5: Northfront Road and North
Vasco Road $157,051 $0 $0 $157,051
SI_6: Portola Ave and N L St $686,581 $0 $0 $686,581
Sum $4,094,946 $0 $0 $4,094,946

Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 S03: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) $4,094,946
2 NA $0
3 NA $0
4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $4,094,946

EXHIBIT A
320
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section IV. Construction Cost Estimate and Cost Breakdown The purpose of this section is to:
o Provide a detailed engineer's estimate for construction items. The costs for other phases i.e. Preliminary Engineering (PE), Right of Way (ROW), and Construction Engineering (CE) will be accounted for in the next section. o Determine the project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR).

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

For each item, enter cost percentages for this project's safety countermeasures (CMs) and "Other Safety (OS)" respectively ( e.g. enter 10 for 10%). The percentage for "Non-safety (NS)" is then calculated. If an item is a general one (such as traffic control, mobilization, etc.), check the "General item" box and the cost breakdown is not needed. A general item will NOT be used in determining the project's overall percentages of countermeasures, other safety and non-safety costs.

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 $6000.00 6,000 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 $3000.00 3,000 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Improve Signal Timing EA 6 $10000.00 60,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $69,000
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $6,900
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $75,900
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 50.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
321
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section V. Project Cost Estimate
All project costs, for all phases and by all funding sources, must be accounted for on this form. i. "Total Cost": Round all costs up to the nearest hundred dollars. ii. "HSIP/Total (%)": The maximum allowed is the project's Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR) as determined in Section I. Click the button to assign the maximum to all, OR enter if not the maximum. iii. "HSIP Funds" and "Local/Other Funds" are calculated.

Pay attention to the interactive warning/error messages below the table. The messages, if any, must be fixed, or exceptions should be justified in narrative question No. 3 in the HSIP Application Form.

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $3,700 %50 $1,850 $1,850
PS&E $15,200 %50 $7,600 $7,600
Subtotal - PE $18,900 50 % $9,450 $9,450
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %50 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %50 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $11,400 %50 $5,700 $5,700 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$75,900 %50 $37,950 $37,950
Subtotal - Construction $87,300 50 % $43,650 $43,650
PROJECT TOTAL $106,200 %50 $53,100 $53,100
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 50 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
322
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
$4,094,946 38.56
$106,200 $53,100 50%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
323
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Improve pedestrian safety at Signalized Intersection: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (Signalized Intersections), Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box), Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval
Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
First St and Southfront Rd, E Stanley Blvd & Murrieta Blvd, Railroad Ave & S P St, First St & Maple St, Portola Ave and N L St

Project Location:
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: 6 Number of Non-signalized Intersections: 0 Miles of Roadways*: *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
324
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
325
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
326
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
327
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Signalized Intersections (SI):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 S01: Add intersection lighting (S.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 S02: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)
3 S03: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=50%) 4 S05: Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems (CRF=0.7 for Emergency vehicle crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 5 S06: Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 S07: Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 S08: Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 S09: Install raised pavement markers and striping (through intersection) (CRF=0.1 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 9 S10: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 10 S11: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 S12: Install raised median on approaches (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 S13PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 S14: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 S15: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 S16: Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 S17PB: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 S18PB: Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 S19PB: Pedestrian Scramble (CRF=0.4 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 19 S20PB: Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) (CRF=0.15 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 20 S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) (CRF=0.6 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
328
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Signalized Intersections)
8 S10 S20PB S21PB
+
- SI_1 First St and Southfront Rd ● ●
+
- SI_2 E Stanley Blvd & Murrieta Blvd ● ● ●
+
- SI_3 Railroad Ave & S P St ● ● ●
+
- SI_4 First St & Maple St ● ●
+
- SI_5 Northfront Road & North Vasco Road ●
+
- SI_6 Portola Ave and N L St ● ●
+
- SI_7 Fenton St and E Stanley Blvd ● ●
+
- SI_8 East Ave and Charlotte Way ● ●

EXHIBIT A
329
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: ALL
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(ALL)
Severe
Injury (ALL)
Other Visible
Injury (ALL)
Complaint
of Pain
(ALL)
PDO
(ALL) Total ID
1 SI_2: E Stanley Blvd & Murrieta
Blvd 0 1 3 5 0 9
2 SI_3: Railroad Ave & S P St 0 1 4 6 0 11
3 SI_5: Northfront Road & North
Vasco Road 0 0 1 4 0 5
Total 0 2 8 15 0 25
Crash Data Table for Crash Type: Pedestrians and Bicyclists Involved (P&B) No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(P&B)
Severe Injury
(P&B)
Other Visible
Injury (P&B)
Complaint
of Pain
(P&B)
PDO
(P&B) Total ID
1 SI_1: First St and Southfront Rd 0 1 0 1 0 2
2 SI_2: E Stanley Blvd & Murrieta
Blvd 0 1 2 2 0 5
3 SI_3: Railroad Ave & S P St 0 1 2 1 0 4
4 SI_4: First St & Maple St 0 1 1 0 0 2
5 SI_6: Portola Ave and N L St 0 1 0 1 0 2
6 SI_7: Fenton St and E Stanley
Blvd 1 1 0 0 0 2
7 SI_8: East Ave and Charlotte
Way 0 1 1 0 0 2
Total 1 7 6 5 0 19

EXHIBIT A
330
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation

Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit SI_1: First St and Southfront Rd $0 $495,766 $1,983,063 $2,478,829 SI_2: E Stanley Blvd & Murrieta
Blvd $1,632,721 $422,934 $1,691,734 $3,747,389
SI_3: Railroad Ave & S P St $1,783,201 $406,135 $1,624,540 $3,813,876 SI_4: First St & Maple St $0 $513,982 $2,055,927 $2,569,909 SI_5: Northfront Road & North
Vasco Road $314,101 $0 $0 $314,101
SI_6: Portola Ave and N L St $0 $495,766 $1,983,063 $2,478,829 SI_7: Fenton St and E Stanley Blvd $0 $943,536 $3,774,144 $4,717,680 SI_8: East Ave and Charlotte Way $0 $513,982 $2,055,927 $2,569,909 Sum $3,730,023 $3,792,101 $15,168,398 $22,690,522

Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 S20PB: Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) $3,792,101 2 S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) $15,168,398
3 S10: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.I.) $3,730,023 4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $22,690,522

EXHIBIT A
331
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 $23327.00 23,327 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 $11663.00 11,663 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Install Flashing Beacon System EA 5 $15000.00 75,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4 Install Conduit and Pull Box LF 1,500 $75.00 112,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 5 Install Pull Box EA 10 $2000.00 20,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 6 Remove Striping LF 232 $2.50 580 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 7 Install Stop Bar LF 961 $8.00 7,688 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 8 Modify Signal Phasing for LPI LS 7 $2500.00 17,500 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $268,258
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $26,826
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $295,100
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
332
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $14,700 %90 $13,230 $1,470
PS&E $59,100 %90 $53,190 $5,910
Subtotal - PE $73,800 90 % $66,420 $7,380
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $44,300 %90 $39,870 $4,430 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$295,100 %90 $265,590 $29,510
Subtotal - Construction $339,400 90 % $305,460 $33,940
PROJECT TOTAL $413,200 %90 $371,880 $41,320
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
333
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
22,690,522 54.91
$413,200 $371,880 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
334
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Improve safety at Non-Signalized Intersections: Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs, Install flashing beacons as advance warning and Install Pedestrian Signal.

Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
Project Location: First St and Portola Ave, First St and Scott St, First St and Bellmawr Dr, Jensen St and East Ave (limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: Number of Non-signalized Intersections: 4 Miles of Roadways*: *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
335
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
336
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
337
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
338
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 1: Select safety countermeasures
Does this application include Signalized Intersections (SI)? No Does this application include Non-signalized Intersections (NS)? Yes Does this application include Roadway Segments (R)? No
* Normally a BCR application only includes locations of one of the above 3 categories (SI, NS or R). Multiple categories may be selected if the application proposes corridor safety improvements or uses a systemic approach, or the applicant chooses to bundle multiple locations in the same vicinity together.

Non-signalized Intersections (NS):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 NS01: Add intersection lighting (NS.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 NS02: Convert to all-way STOP control (from 2-way or Yield control) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 3 NS03: Install signals (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 NS04: Convert intersection to roundabout (from all way stop) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 NS05: Convert intersection to roundabout (from stop or yield control on minor road) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 NS05mr: Convert intersection to mini-roundabout (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 7 NS06: Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 8 NS07: Upgrade intersection pavement markings (NS.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 9 NS08: Install Flashing Beacons at Stop-Controlled Intersections (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 10 NS09: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (NS.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 NS10: Install transverse rumble strips on approaches (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 12 NS11: Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 13 NS12: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 14 NS13: Install splitter-islands on the minor road approaches (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 NS14: Install raised median on approaches (NS.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 NS15: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (NS.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 NS16: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (NS.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 NS17: Install right-turn lane (NS.I.) (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 NS18: Install left-turn lane (where no left-turn lane exists) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 NS19PB: Install raised medians / refuge islands (NS.I.) (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 NS20PB: Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (new signs and markings only) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 22 NS21PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)
✔ 23 NS22PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 24 NS23PB: Install Pedestrian Signal (including Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK)) (CRF=0.55 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
339
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Non-signalized Intersections)
6 NS06 NS09 NS22PB
+
- NSI_1 First St and Portola Ave ● ● ●
+
- NSI_2 First St and Scott St ● ●
+
- NSI_3 Jensen St and East Ave ● ●
+
- NSI_4 Maple St and 5th St ●
+
- NSI_5 Charlotte Way and Marcella St ●
+
- NSI_6 Charlotte Way and Arlene Way ●

EXHIBIT A
340
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: ALL
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(ALL)
Severe
Injury (ALL)
Other Visible
Injury (ALL)
Complaint
of Pain
(ALL)
PDO
(ALL) Total ID
1 NSI_1: First St and Portola Ave 1 2 7 2 0 12
2 NSI_2: First St and Scott St 1 0 3 4 0 8
3 NSI_3: Jensen St and East Ave 1 0 4 5 0 10
4 NSI_4: Maple St and 5th St 0 1 1 0 0 2
5 NSI_5: Charlotte Way and
Marcella St 0 1 0 0 0 1
6 NSI_6: Charlotte Way and
Arlene Way 0 0 1 0 0 1
Total 3 4 16 11 0 34
Crash Data Table for Crash Type: Pedestrians and Bicyclists Involved (P&B) No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(P&B)
Severe Injury
(P&B)
Other Visible
Injury (P&B)
Complaint
of Pain
(P&B)
PDO
(P&B) Total ID
1 NSI_1: First St and Portola Ave 1 0 1 0 0 2
2 NSI_2: First St and Scott St 1 0 1 0 0 2
3 NSI_3: Jensen St and East Ave 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total 3 0 2 0 0 5

EXHIBIT A
341
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit NSI_1: First St and Portola Ave $2,654,128 $5,308,255 $3,352,738 $11,315,121 NSI_2: First St and Scott St $1,105,891 $0 $3,888,756 $4,994,647 NSI_3: Jensen St and East Ave $1,181,131 $0 $3,681,685 $4,862,816 NSI_4: Maple St and 5th St $900,871 $0 $0 $900,871
NSI_5: Charlotte Way and
Marcella St $852,901 $0 $0 $852,901
NSI_6: Charlotte Way and Arlene
Way $47,971 $0 $0 $47,971
Sum $6,742,893 $5,308,255 $10,923,179 $22,974,327
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 NS06: Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs $6,742,893
2 NS09: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (NS.I.) $5,308,255 3 NS22PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) $10,923,179 4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $22,974,327

EXHIBIT A
342
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 $25538.00 25,538 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 $12769.00 12,769 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Remove Sign and Post EA 28 $200.00 5,600 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4 Remove Sign EA 29 $175.00 5,075 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 5 Install sign EA 39 $300.00 11,700 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 6 Install Sign and Post EA 36 $500.00 18,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 7 Remove Existing LED Sign
System
EA 2 $3000.00 6,000 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 8 Install Flashing Beacon System EA 1 $15000.00 15,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 9 Install High Visibility Crosswalk EA 2 $1000.00 2,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 10 Install Sign and Post EA 3 $500.00 1,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 11 Install Pavement Marking EA 4 $500.00 2,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 12 Install Bulbout EA 3 $20000.00 60,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 13 Install Curb Ramp EA 4 $7500.00 30,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 14 Install Median Concrete SF 200 $50.00 10,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 15 Install Median Curb LF 60 $75.00 4,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 16 Install RRFB System EA 7 $12000.00 84,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $293,682
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $29,368
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $323,100

EXHIBIT A
343
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
344
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $16,100 %90 $14,490 $1,610
PS&E $64,700 %90 $58,230 $6,470
Subtotal - PE $80,800 90 % $72,720 $8,080
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $48,500 %90 $43,650 $4,850 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$323,100 %90 $290,790 $32,310
Subtotal - Construction $371,600 90 % $334,440 $37,160
PROJECT TOTAL $452,400 %90 $407,160 $45,240
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
345
HSIP Analyzer

Page 12 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
22,974,327 50.78
$452,400 $407,160 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
346
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Citywide Signal Upgrade: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number.

Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
Project Location: Livermore City Wide
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: 112 Number of Non-signalized Intersections: 0 Miles of Roadways*: *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
347
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
348
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
349
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
350
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Signalized Intersections (SI):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 S01: Add intersection lighting (S.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 2 S02: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)
3 S03: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=50%) 4 S05: Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems (CRF=0.7 for Emergency vehicle crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 5 S06: Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 S07: Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 S08: Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 S09: Install raised pavement markers and striping (through intersection) (CRF=0.1 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 9 S10: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 10 S11: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 S12: Install raised median on approaches (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 S13PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 S14: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 S15: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 S16: Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 S17PB: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 S18PB: Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 S19PB: Pedestrian Scramble (CRF=0.4 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 S20PB: Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) (CRF=0.15 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 20 S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) (CRF=0.6 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
351
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

EXHIBIT A
352
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

EXHIBIT A
353
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit SI_1: Livermore City Wide $44,621,431 $0 $0 $44,621,431 Sum $44,621,431 $0 $0 $44,621,431
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 S02: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number $44,621,431 2 NA $0
3 NA $0
4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $44,621,431

EXHIBIT A
354
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Mobilization LS 1 144,375 144,375 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Traffic Control LS 1 288,750 288,750 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Remove Existing 8" Signal Head EA 30 $500.00 15,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4
Furnish and Install New Signal
Head Assembly with Backplate
with Yellow Retroreflective
Border
EA 45 $3000.00 135,000 100 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 5
Replace Existing Backplate with
New Backplate with Yellow
Retroreflective Border
EA 1,825 $1500.00 2,737,500 100 % 0 % 0 %
Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $3,320,625
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $332,062
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $3,652,700
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
355
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $182,600 %90 $164,340 $18,260
PS&E $730,600 %90 $657,540 $73,060
Subtotal - PE $913,200 90 % $821,880 $91,320
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $548,000 %90 $493,200 $54,800 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$3,652,700 %90 $3,287,430 $365,270
Subtotal - Construction $4,200,700 90 % $3,780,630 $420,070 PROJECT TOTAL $5,113,900 %90 $4,602,510 $511,390
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
356
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 11 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
44,621,431 8.73
$5,113,900 $4,602,510 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
357
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Citywide Street Light Inventory: Add intersection lighting (Signalized Intersection), Add intersection lighting (Non-signalized Intersection)
Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
Project Location: Livermore City Wide
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: Number of Non-signalized Intersections:

Miles of Roadways*: 310 *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
358
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
359
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
360
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
361
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 1: Select safety countermeasures
Does this application include Signalized Intersections (SI)? Yes Does this application include Non-signalized Intersections (NS)? Yes Does this application include Roadway Segments (R)? Yes * Normally a BCR application only includes locations of one of the above 3 categories (SI, NS or R). Multiple categories may be selected if the application proposes corridor safety improvements or uses a systemic approach, or the applicant chooses to bundle multiple locations in the same vicinity together.

Signalized Intersections (SI):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
✔ 1 S01: Add intersection lighting (S.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 S02: Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)
3 S03: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=50%) 4 S05: Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems (CRF=0.7 for Emergency vehicle crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 5 S06: Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 S07: Provide protected left turn phase (left turn lane already exists) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 S08: Convert signal to mast arm (from pedestal-mounted) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 S09: Install raised pavement markers and striping (through intersection) (CRF=0.1 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 9 S10: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (S.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 10 S11: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 S12: Install raised median on approaches (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 S13PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 S14: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 S15: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (S.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 S16: Convert intersection to roundabout (from signal) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 S17PB: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 S18PB: Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 S19PB: Pedestrian Scramble (CRF=0.4 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 S20PB: Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) (CRF=0.15 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 20 S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) (CRF=0.6 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
362
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Non-signalized Intersections (NS):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
✔ 1 NS01: Add intersection lighting (NS.I.) (CRF=0.4 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 NS02: Convert to all-way STOP control (from 2-way or Yield control) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 3 NS03: Install signals (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 NS04: Convert intersection to roundabout (from all way stop) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 NS05: Convert intersection to roundabout (from stop or yield control on minor road) (CRF varies for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 6 NS05mr: Convert intersection to mini-roundabout (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 NS06: Install/upgrade larger or additional stop signs or other intersection warning/regulatory signs (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 8 NS07: Upgrade intersection pavement markings (NS.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 9 NS08: Install Flashing Beacons at Stop-Controlled Intersections (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 10 NS09: Install flashing beacons as advance warning (NS.I.) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 11 NS10: Install transverse rumble strips on approaches (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 12 NS11: Improve sight distance to intersection (Clear Sight Triangles) (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 13 NS12: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 14 NS13: Install splitter-islands on the minor road approaches (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 NS14: Install raised median on approaches (NS.I.) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 NS15: Create directional median openings to allow (and restrict) left-turns and u-turns (NS.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 NS16: Reduced Left-Turn Conflict Intersections (NS.I.) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 NS17: Install right-turn lane (NS.I.) (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 NS18: Install left-turn lane (where no left-turn lane exists) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 NS19PB: Install raised medians / refuge islands (NS.I.) (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 NS20PB: Install pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (new signs and markings only) (CRF=0.25 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 22 NS21PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)
23 NS22PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 24 NS23PB: Install Pedestrian Signal (including Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK)) (CRF=0.55 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
363
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Roadways (R):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
✔ 1 R01: Add segment lighting (CRF=0.35 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 R02: Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 3 R03: Install Median Barrier (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 R04: Install Guardrail (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 R05: Install impact attenuators (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 6 R06: Flatten side slopes (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 R07: Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 R08: Install raised median (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 9 R09: Install median (flush) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 10 R10PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 11 R11: Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 R12: Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 R13: Add two-way left-turn lane (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 R14: Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 R15: Widen shoulder (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 R16: Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only) (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 R17: Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 R18: Flatten crest vertical curve (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 R19: Improve curve superelevation (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 R20: Convert from two-way to one-way traffic (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 R21: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 22 R22: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 23 R23: Install chevron signs on horizontal curves (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 24 R24: Install curve advance warning signs (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 25 R25: Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 26 R26: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 27 R27: Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 28 R28: Install edge-lines and centerlines (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 29 R29: Install no-passing line (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 30 R30: Install centerline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 31 R31: Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 32 R32PB: Install bike lanes (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 33 R33PB: Install Separated Bike Lanes (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 34 R34PB: Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) (CRF=0.8 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 35 R35PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 36 R36PB: Install raised pedestrian crossing (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 37 R37PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 38 R38: Install animal fencing (CRF=0.8 for Animal crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
364
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Signalized Intersections)
1 S01
+
- SI_1 Livermore City Wide Intersection Lighting ●
(Non-signalized Intersections)
1 NS01
+
- NSI_1 Livermore City Wide Intersection Lighting ●
(Roadway Segments)
1 R01
+
- R_1 All streets and roadways throughout the City of Pico Rivera. ●

EXHIBIT A
365
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: Night-time (Night)
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(Night)
Severe Injury
(Night)
Other Visible
Injury (Night)
Complaint
of Pain
(Night)
PDO
(Night) Total ID
1 SI_1: Livermore City Wide
Intersection Lighting
11 23 95 182 0 311
2 NSI_1: Livermore City Wide
Intersection Lighting
0 0 0 0 0 0
3 R_1: All streets and roadways
throughout the City of Pico
Rivera.
4 7 33 58 0 102
Total 15 30 128 240 0 413

EXHIBIT A
366
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit SI_1: Livermore City Wide
Intersection Lighting $147,987,680 $0 $0 $147,987,680
NSI_1: Livermore City Wide
Intersection Lighting $0 $0 $0 $0
R_1: All streets and roadways
throughout the City of Pico
Rivera.
$52,667,860 $0 $0 $52,667,860
Sum $200,655,540 $0 $0 $200,655,540
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 S01: Add intersection lighting (S.I.) $147,987,680
2 NS01: Add intersection lighting (NS.I.) $0
3 R01: Add segment lighting $52,667,860
4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $200,655,540

EXHIBIT A
367
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 560,125 560,125 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 280,063 280,063 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Install Street Light Pole EA 205 $16000.00 3,280,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4 Install Street Light Pull Box EA 260 $750.00 195,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 5 Install Street Lighting Conduit EA 24,750 $75.00 1,856,250 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 6 Install Service Point EA 18 $15000.00 270,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $6,441,438
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $644,144
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $7,085,600
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
368
HSIP Analyzer

Page 12 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $354,200 %90 $318,780 $35,420
PS&E $1,417,200 %90 $1,275,480 $141,720
Subtotal - PE $1,771,400 90 % $1,594,260 $177,140
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $1,062,900 %90 $956,610 $106,290 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$7,085,600 %90 $6,377,040 $708,560
Subtotal - Construction $8,148,500 90 % $7,333,650 $814,850 PROJECT TOTAL $9,919,900 %90 $8,927,910 $991,990
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
369
HSIP Analyzer

Page 13 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
200,655,540 20.23
$9,919,900 $8,927,910 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
370
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Project Description: Citywide Sign Inventory: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) (limited to 250 characters)
Project Location: Livermore City Wide
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: Number of Non-signalized Intersections:

Miles of Roadways*: 310 *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
371
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
372
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
373
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
374
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 1: Select safety countermeasures
Does this application include Signalized Intersections (SI)? No Does this application include Non-signalized Intersections (NS)? No Does this application include Roadway Segments (R)? Yes * Normally a BCR application only includes locations of one of the above 3 categories (SI, NS or R). Multiple categories may be selected if the application proposes corridor safety improvements or uses a systemic approach, or the applicant chooses to bundle multiple locations in the same vicinity together.

EXHIBIT A
375
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Roadways (R):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 R01: Add segment lighting (CRF=0.35 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 R02: Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 3 R03: Install Median Barrier (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 R04: Install Guardrail (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 R05: Install impact attenuators (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 6 R06: Flatten side slopes (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 R07: Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 R08: Install raised median (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 9 R09: Install median (flush) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 10 R10PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 11 R11: Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 R12: Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 R13: Add two-way left-turn lane (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 R14: Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 R15: Widen shoulder (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 R16: Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only) (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 R17: Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 R18: Flatten crest vertical curve (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 R19: Improve curve superelevation (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 R20: Convert from two-way to one-way traffic (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 R21: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 22 R22: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 23 R23: Install chevron signs on horizontal curves (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 24 R24: Install curve advance warning signs (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 25 R25: Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 26 R26: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 27 R27: Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 28 R28: Install edge-lines and centerlines (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 29 R29: Install no-passing line (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 30 R30: Install centerline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 31 R31: Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 32 R32PB: Install bike lanes (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 33 R33PB: Install Separated Bike Lanes (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 34 R34PB: Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) (CRF=0.8 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 35 R35PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 36 R36PB: Install raised pedestrian crossing (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 37 R37PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 38 R38: Install animal fencing (CRF=0.8 for Animal crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
376
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Roadway Segments)
1 R22
+
- R_1 All intersection and roadways throughout the City of Livermore. ●

EXHIBIT A
377
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

EXHIBIT A
378
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit R_1: All intersection and
roadways throughout the City of
Livermore.
$87,487,051 $0 $0 $87,487,051
Sum $87,487,051 $0 $0 $87,487,051
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 R22: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) $87,487,051
2 NA $0
3 NA $0
4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $87,487,051

EXHIBIT A
379
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Mobilization LS 1 201,875 201,875 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Traffic Control LS 1 403,750 403,750 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Remove Sign EA 8,500 $175.00 1,487,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4 Install Sign EA 8,500 $300.00 2,550,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $4,643,125
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $464,312
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $5,107,500
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
380
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $255,300 %90 $229,770 $25,530
PS&E $1,021,500 %90 $919,350 $102,150
Subtotal - PE $1,276,800 90 % $1,149,120 $127,680
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $766,200 %90 $689,580 $76,620 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$5,107,500 %90 $4,596,750 $510,750
Subtotal - Construction $5,873,700 90 % $5,286,330 $587,370 PROJECT TOTAL $7,150,500 %90 $6,435,450 $715,050
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
381
HSIP Analyzer

Page 12 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
87,487,051 12.24
$7,150,500 $6,435,450 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
382
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Project Description: Improve safety on Corridors: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs (limited to 250 characters)
First St, Murrieta Blvd, Concannon Blvd, Las Positas Road, N Livermore Ave, S. Vasco Rd, W Jack London Blvd, Portola Ave, E Stanley Blvd and Patterson Pass Rd.

Project Location:
(limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: Number of Non-signalized Intersections:

Miles of Roadways*: 24 *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
383
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
384
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
385
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
386
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

EXHIBIT A
387
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Roadways (R):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 R01: Add segment lighting (CRF=0.35 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 R02: Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 3 R03: Install Median Barrier (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 R04: Install Guardrail (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 R05: Install impact attenuators (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 6 R06: Flatten side slopes (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 R07: Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 R08: Install raised median (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 9 R09: Install median (flush) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 10 R10PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 11 R11: Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 R12: Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 R13: Add two-way left-turn lane (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 R14: Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 R15: Widen shoulder (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 R16: Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only) (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 R17: Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 R18: Flatten crest vertical curve (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 R19: Improve curve superelevation (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 R20: Convert from two-way to one-way traffic (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 R21: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 22 R22: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 23 R23: Install chevron signs on horizontal curves (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 24 R24: Install curve advance warning signs (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 25 R25: Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 26 R26: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 27 R27: Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 28 R28: Install edge-lines and centerlines (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 29 R29: Install no-passing line (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 30 R30: Install centerline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 31 R31: Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 32 R32PB: Install bike lanes (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 33 R33PB: Install Separated Bike Lanes (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 34 R34PB: Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) (CRF=0.8 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 35 R35PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 36 R36PB: Install raised pedestrian crossing (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 37 R37PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 38 R38: Install animal fencing (CRF=0.8 for Animal crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
388
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Roadway Segments)
8 R26
+
- R_1 First St: E Stanley Blvd to I-580/John P Miller Memorial Hwy ●
+
- R_2 Murietta Blvd: Holmes St to Portola Ave ●
+
- R_3 Concannon Blvd: Isabel Avenue to S. Livermore Ave ● +
- R_4 N. Livermore Ave: 400' N (City Limit) to Railroad Ave ● +
- R_5 S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City Limit S) ●
+
- R_6 W Jack London Blvd: Wolf House Dr to 1900 W’ from Discovery Dr ●
+
- R_7 E Stanley Blvd: Railroad Avenue to Murdell Lane ● +
- R_8 Patterson Pass Rd: Greenville Rd to N Mines Rd ●

EXHIBIT A
389
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: ALL
No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(ALL)
Severe
Injury (ALL)
Other Visible
Injury (ALL)
Complaint
of Pain
(ALL)
PDO
(ALL) Total ID
1 R_1: First St: E Stanley Blvd to
I-580/John P Miller Memorial
Hwy
4 3 33 76 116
2 R_2: Murietta Blvd: Holmes St
to Portola Ave 1 3 13 15 32
3 R_3: Concannon Blvd: Isabel
Avenue to S. Livermore Ave 0 1 9 14 24
4 R_4: N. Livermore Ave: 400' N
(City Limit) to Railroad Ave 0 3 17 49 69
5 R_5: S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City
Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City
Limit S)
2 2 16 60 80
6 R_6: W Jack London Blvd: Wolf
House Dr to 1900 W’ from
Discovery Dr
0 3 10 30 43
7 R_7: E Stanley Blvd: Railroad
Avenue to Murdell Lane 2 2 16 41 61
8 R_8: Patterson Pass Rd:

Greenville Rd to N Mines Rd 1 2 9 15 27
Total 10 19 123 300 452

EXHIBIT A
390
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit R_1: First St: E Stanley Blvd to
I-580/John P Miller Memorial
Hwy
$17,647,260 $0 $0 $17,647,260
R_2: Murietta Blvd: Holmes St to
Portola Ave $7,971,721 $0 $0 $7,971,721
R_3: Concannon Blvd: Isabel
Avenue to S. Livermore Ave $3,103,621 $0 $0 $3,103,621
R_4: N. Livermore Ave: 400' N
(City Limit) to Railroad Ave $8,733,241 $0 $0 $8,733,241 R_5: S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City
Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City Limit
S)
$10,713,841 $0 $0 $10,713,841
R_6: W Jack London Blvd: Wolf
House Dr to 1900 W’ from
Discovery Dr
$7,025,401 $0 $0 $7,025,401
R_7: E Stanley Blvd: Railroad
Avenue to Murdell Lane $9,677,580 $0 $0 $9,677,580
R_8: Patterson Pass Rd:

Greenville Rd to N Mines Rd $6,111,361 $0 $0 $6,111,361 Sum $70,984,026 $0 $0 $70,984,026
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 R26: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs $70,984,026 2 NA $0
3 NA $0
4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $70,984,026

EXHIBIT A
391
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 $35250.00 35,250 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 $70500.00 70,500 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Install Dynamic/Variable Speed
Warning Sign EA 47 $15000.00 705,000 100 % 0 % 0 %
Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $810,750
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $81,075
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $891,900
IV.2 Funding Reimbursement Ratio
Project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio = 90.0%
The project's Maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio is calculated from the least of the FEs of the project's countermeasures and reduced if the non-safety cost percentage is in excess of 10%. See the HSIP Analyzer Manual for details. This is the maximum value allowed to be entered in "HSIP/Total(%)" column in Section II (Project Cost Estimate).

EXHIBIT A
392
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $44,500 %90 $40,050 $4,450
PS&E $178,400 %90 $160,560 $17,840
Subtotal - PE $222,900 90 % $200,610 $22,290
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $133,800 %90 $120,420 $13,380 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$891,900 %90 $802,710 $89,190
Subtotal - Construction $1,025,700 90 % $923,130 $102,570 PROJECT TOTAL $1,248,600 %90 $1,123,740 $124,860
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
393
HSIP Analyzer

Page 12 of 12 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
70,984,026 56.85
$1,248,600 $1,123,740 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
394
HSIP Analyzer

Page 1 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

This is a dynamic form (i.e. later steps vary depending on the data entered in earlier steps). If any error messages appear, please fix the errors prior to proceeding to the next steps.

Save this file using "HA" +Application ID as the file name (e.g. "HA03-Sacramento-01.pdf"). Attach the completed HSIP Analyzer to the last page of the HSIP Application Form.

Application ID, Project Location and Project Description (copy from the HSIP Application Form):

Section I: General Information
Application ID:

Improve pedestrian and bicycle safety on corridors: Install Separated Bike Lanes, Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features), Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) Project Description:
(limited to 250 characters)
Project Location: First St, Murrieta Blvd, Concannon Blvd, N. Livermore Ave, S. Vasco Road, Portola Ave and E Stanley Blvd (limited to 250 characters)
Number of Signalized Intersections: Number of Non-signalized Intersections:

Miles of Roadways*: 14 *Do not include the length of the intersections that have been accounted for in the number of intersections above.

EXHIBIT A
395
HSIP Analyzer

Page 2 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For California Road System (CRS)
maps to check the FC, click here.

What is the primary mode of travel intended to be benefited by this project)? Approximate percentage of project cost going to improvements related to motorized travel Functional Classification (FC):

Urban / Rural Area:

What is the approximate total cost percentage that is HR3 eligible?

EXHIBIT A
396
HSIP Analyzer

Page 3 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

PE Authorization Date:

Environmental Clearance Date:

Right of Way Clearance Date:

Final PS&E Date:

CON Authorization Date:

Construction Contract Award Date:

Construction Completion Date:

Project Close-Out Date:

EXHIBIT A
397
HSIP Analyzer

Page 4 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

For more information regarding crash data, please refer to the Manual for HSIP Analyzer and the Local Roadway Safety Manual.

Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and UC Berkeley SafeTREC TIMS

2. Please explain how "incremental approach" has been pursued if CM R15, R16, R17 or R18 is proposed. Please skip this question if none of these CMs are being proposed.

EXHIBIT A
398
HSIP Analyzer

Page 5 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

EXHIBIT A
399
HSIP Analyzer

Page 6 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Roadways (R):

Click the check box in the 1st column to select up to 3 countermeasures.

Hide unselected countermeasures View all countermeasures Select No. Countermeasure Name
1 R01: Add segment lighting (CRF=0.35 for Night crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 2 R02: Remove or relocate fixed objects outside of Clear Recovery Zone (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 3 R03: Install Median Barrier (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 4 R04: Install Guardrail (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 5 R05: Install impact attenuators (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 6 R06: Flatten side slopes (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 7 R07: Flatten side slopes and remove guardrail (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 8 R08: Install raised median (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 9 R09: Install median (flush) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 10 R10PB: Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 11 R11: Install acceleration/ deceleration lanes (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 12 R12: Widen lane (initially less than 10 ft) (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 13 R13: Add two-way left-turn lane (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 14 R14: Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 15 R15: Widen shoulder (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 16 R16: Curve Shoulder widening (Outside Only) (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 17 R17: Improve horizontal alignment (flatten curves) (CRF=0.5 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 18 R18: Flatten crest vertical curve (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 19 R19: Improve curve superelevation (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 20 R20: Convert from two-way to one-way traffic (CRF=0.35 for All crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 21 R21: Improve pavement friction (High Friction Surface Treatments) (CRF=0.55 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 22 R22: Install/Upgrade signs with new fluorescent sheeting (regulatory or warning) (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 23 R23: Install chevron signs on horizontal curves (CRF=0.4 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 24 R24: Install curve advance warning signs (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 25 R25: Install curve advance warning signs (flashing beacon) (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 26 R26: Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs (CRF=0.3 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 27 R27: Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 28 R28: Install edge-lines and centerlines (CRF=0.25 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 29 R29: Install no-passing line (CRF=0.45 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 30 R30: Install centerline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.2 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 31 R31: Install edgeline rumble strips/stripes (CRF=0.15 for All crashes; Life=10 yrs; FE=90%) 32 R32PB: Install bike lanes (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 33 R33PB: Install Separated Bike Lanes (CRF=0.45 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 34 R34PB: Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) (CRF=0.8 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 35 R35PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 36 R36PB: Install raised pedestrian crossing (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) ✔ 37 R37PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) (CRF=0.35 for Ped & Bike crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%) 38 R38: Install animal fencing (CRF=0.8 for Animal crashes; Life=20 yrs; FE=90%)

EXHIBIT A
400
HSIP Analyzer

Page 7 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Click to Generate Table for Project Locations Entry
CMs have been selected. Ok to proceed.
+/- Line Location
No.

Location Description
(Intersection Name or Road Limit or General Description) Click to select
Countermeasures
Error Messages
(must resolve)
(Roadway Segments)
7 R33PB R35PB R37PB
+
- R_1 First St: E Stanley Blvd to I-580/John P Miller Memorial Hwy ●
+
- R_2 Murietta Blvd: Holmes St to Portola Ave ●
+
- R_3 Concannon Blvd: Isabel Avenue to S. Livermore Ave ● ● ● +
- R_4 S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City Limit S) ●
+
- R_5 Portola Avenue: First St to Murrieta Blvd ●
+
- R_6 E Stanley Blvd: Railroad Avenue to Murdell Lane ● +
- R_7 Maple Street: First Street to East Avenue ●

EXHIBIT A
401
HSIP Analyzer

Page 8 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 3: Click to generate tables for crash data and provide crash data. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Generate Tables for Crash Data Entry
No crash tables have been created since there are unresolved error messages in the last column of the location table. Please correct first.

Crash Data Period: must be between 3 and 5 years.

Crash Data Table for Crash Type: Pedestrians and Bicyclists Involved (P&B) No. Location No : Description
(from Step 2)
Fatal
(P&B)
Severe Injury
(P&B)
Other Visible
Injury (P&B)
Complaint
of Pain
(P&B)
PDO
(P&B) Total ID
1 R_1: First St: E Stanley Blvd to
I-580/John P Miller Memorial
Hwy
3 1 8 9 0 21
2 R_2: Murietta Blvd: Holmes St
to Portola Ave 0 1 2 3 0 6
3 R_3: Concannon Blvd: Isabel
Avenue to S. Livermore Ave 0 0 3 0 0 3
4 R_4: S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City
Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City
Limit S)
0 0 4 3 0 7
5 R_5: Portola Avenue: First St to
Murrieta Blvd 0 2 4 4 0 10
6 R_6: E Stanley Blvd: Railroad
Avenue to Murdell Lane 2 2 4 5 0 13
7 R_7: Maple Street: First Street
to East Avenue 0 2 3 1 0 6
Total 5 8 28 25 0 66

EXHIBIT A
402
HSIP Analyzer

Page 9 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Step 4: Click to Calculate the project benefit. If any changes have been made in the previous two steps, you must re-click to refresh.

Click to Perform Benefit Calculation
Benefit Summary:

Benefit by Locations
Location No : Description [CM1] Benefit [CM2] Benefit [CM3] Benefit Total Benefit R_1: First St: E Stanley Blvd to
I-580/John P Miller Memorial
Hwy
$21,494,340 $0 $0 $21,494,340
R_2: Murietta Blvd: Holmes St to
Portola Ave $5,496,300 $0 $0 $5,496,300
R_3: Concannon Blvd: Isabel
Avenue to S. Livermore Ave $576,360 $448,280 $448,280 $1,472,920 R_4: S. Vasco Rd: I-580 (City
Limit N) to Tesla Rd (City Limit
S)
$1,642,140 $0 $0 $1,642,140
R_5: Portola Avenue: First St to
Murrieta Blvd $0 $8,295,281 $0 $8,295,281
R_6: E Stanley Blvd: Railroad
Avenue to Murdell Lane $15,812,391 $12,298,527 $0 $28,110,918 R_7: Maple Street: First Street to
East Avenue $0 $7,689,641 $0 $7,689,641
Sum $45,021,531 $28,731,729 $448,280 $74,201,540
Benefit by Countermeasures
No. Countermeasure Benefit
1 R33PB: Install Separated Bike Lanes $45,021,531
2 R35PB: Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features) $28,731,729
3 R37PB: Install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) $448,280 4 NA $0
5 NA $0
6 NA $0
7 NA $0
8 NA $0
9 NA $0
TOTAL $74,201,540

EXHIBIT A
403
HSIP Analyzer

Page 10 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

IV.1 Detailed Engineer's Estimate for Construction Items:

Cost breakdown:

No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total
General Item?
(Click center
to check)
%
for CMs
% for
OS
% for
NS
+
- 1 Traffic Control LS 1 303,907 303,907 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 2 Mobilization LS 1 151,954 151,954 0 % 0 % 0 %
+
- 3 Remove Striping LF 142,960 $2.50 357,400 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 4 Install Striping LF 229,840 $4.00 919,360 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 5 Install Delineators EA 3,766 $50.00 188,300 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 6 Install Pavement Marking EA 171 $500.00 85,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 7 Install Green Pavement Marking SF 26,320 $20.00 526,400 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 8 Remove Median SF 25,300 $15.00 379,500 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 9 Remove Median Curb LF 6,330 $20.00 126,600 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 10 Install High Visibility Crosswalk EA 13 $1000.00 13,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 11 Install Sign and Post EA 28 $500.00 14,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 12 Install Bulbout EA 12 $20000.00 240,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 13 Install Curb Ramp EA 22 $7500.00 165,000 100 % 0 % 0 % +
- 14 Install RRFB System EA 2 $12000.00 24,000 100 % 0 % 0 % Weighted Average (%)
Total ($) $3,494,921
100%
Contingencies, as % of the above "Total" of the construction items:
(e.g. enter 10 for 10%) %10 $349,492
Total Construction Cost (Con Items & Contingencies):
(Rounded up to the nearest hundreds) $3,844,500

EXHIBIT A
404
HSIP Analyzer

Page 11 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

EXHIBIT A
405
HSIP Analyzer

Page 12 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Description Total Cost HISP/Total
(%) HSIP Funds Local/Other Funds
Preliminary Engineering (PE) Phase
Environmental $192,200 %90 $172,980 $19,220
PS&E $768,900 %90 $692,010 $76,890
Subtotal - PE $961,100 90 % $864,990 $96,110
Right of Way (ROW) Phase
Right of Way Engineering $0 %90 $0 $0
Appraisals, Acquisitions &
Utilities $0 %90 $0 $0
Subtotal - Right of Way (ROW) $0 % $0 $0
Construction (CON) Phase
Construction Engineering (CE) $576,700 %90 $519,030 $57,670 Construction Items
(Read only - from Section I)
$3,844,500 %90 $3,460,050 $384,450
Subtotal - Construction $4,421,200 90 % $3,979,080 $442,120 PROJECT TOTAL $5,382,300 %90 $4,844,070 $538,230
Agency does NOT request HSIP funds for PE Phase (automatically checked if PE - HSIP funds is $0). 90 %
Set
Project's maximum Funding Reimbursement Ratio (FRR)
(from Section I, rounded up to integer)
To set all "HSIP/Total (%)" in the below table
to the above maximum FRR, click "Set":

Interactive Warning/Error Messages:

If there are any messages in the below box, please fix OR explain justification for exceptions in narrative question No 3 in the HSIP application form.

EXHIBIT A
406
HSIP Analyzer

Page 13 of 13 ends

Version Date: April 2022
Application ID:

Section VI. Summary
Transfer the "Total Project Cost" , "HSIP Funds Requested" and the BCR to Page 2 of the HSIP Application Form.

Cost, FRR, Benefit and BCR:
74,201,540 12.22
$5,382,300 $4,844,070 90%
Total Project Cost HSIP Funds Requested Max. FRR
Total Expected Benefit Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR)

EXHIBIT A
407
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.7
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Paul Spence, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the acceptance for permanent maintenance, release of security bonds, and execution of a Notice of Completion for the Trevarno Road Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements Project 2019-60, located along Trevarno Road at First Street.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance for permanent maintenance and release of the security bonds for the Trevarno Road Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements Project 2019-60, located along Trevarno Road at First Street, and authorizing the City Manager to sign the Notice of Completion.

SUMMARY
On March 13, 2023, the City Council awarded the contract for construction of the Trevarno Road Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements Project 2019-60 to Paulson Cox Construction, Inc. The contract was substantially completed on October 4, 2023, and can be accepted for permanent maintenance. The process to release the contractor's bonds can begin.

DISCUSSION
On July 26, 2021, City Council approved the establishment of the Trevarno Road Sewer and Water Improvements Assessment District 2021-1 (Assessment District) to replace the deteriorating private sewer and water utilities along Trevarno Road with public services. The Trevarno Road Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements Project included installation of new public sanitary sewer and potable water mains and services, abandonment of existing mains and fire hydrants within the public utility easement, pavement repair, and slurry seal along Trevarno Road as shown in Attachment 1 - Location Map. The project was completed in accordance with the contract documents in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer and can now be accepted for permanent maintenance.

At time of award, the contractor provided a faithful performance bond guaranteeing completion of the project, and that bond must now be released. Six months after the date of the resolution accepting the project, the labor and materials bond guaranteeing the improvements should be reduced to an amount 408
equal to any claims filed and of which notice has been given. The balance of the bond will be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for which the security was given. All claims for this project have been settled. The security for the guarantee and warranty of work shall remain in effect for one year from the date of the resolution.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The majority of the project is funded by the Trevarno Road Sewer and Water Improvements Assessment District 2021-1 with approximately 5 percent of the funding for General Benefit provided by Sewer (Fund 241) and Water (Fund 251) Connection Fees.

The original construction contract amount was $1,131,430, plus a 10 percent contingency for change orders. The final contract amount is $1,158,880, which is 2.4% above the original contract based on final bid item quantities and $27,450 in five Change Orders consisting mainly of unforeseen underground utility conflicts. The City has reviewed the overall project costs which include project management, planning, engineering, environmental, construction, construction management, inspection, material testing, and other incidental cost associated with the formation and management of the district and has determined that there are no surplus funds remaining.

Annual operations and maintenance costs for new sanitary sewer and water systems are estimated at $15,000 per year. Operations and maintenance costs will be funded from water and sewer user fees.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City that Works
GOAL
14: Develop, operate, and maintain the City's infrastructure

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - Notice of Completion
Prepared by: Farnoush Levers
Senior Civil Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
409
City of Livermore
This map is based on City of Livermore GIS
Information and reflects the most current information
at the time of this printing. The map is intended for
reference purposes only and the City and its staff is
not responsible for errors. 2,000 Livermore IT, GIS Services 333.3
1: NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Ft_US 166.67 Feet 0 333.3
1/31/2023 2:33:38
PM
Prepared:

Notes:

Scale:
410
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE FOR PERMANENT MAINTENANCE,

RELEASE OF SECURITY BONDS, AND EXECUTION OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR

THE TREVARNO ROAD SANITARY SEWER AND WATER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT,

LOCATED ALONG TREVARNO ROAD AT FIRST STREET
(PROJECT NO. 2019-60)
The City Engineer of the City of Livermore (“City”) has filed with the City Clerk a report in writing that all work on the Trevarno Road Sanitary Sewer and Water Improvements Project 2019- 60 (“Project”), has been completed to City standards. The Project is ready for acceptance by the City of Livermore for routine maintenance.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that:

1. The faithful performance bond guaranteeing the Project is hereby released;

2. The labor and materials bond guaranteeing the Project shall, six months after the date of this resolution, be reduced to an amount equal to the amount of all claims filed and of which notice has been given. The balance of the bond shall be released upon the settlement of all such claims and obligations for which the security was given;

3. The security for the guarantee and warranty of work shall remain in effect for one year from the date of this resolution. The contractor is required to reconstruct any deficiencies that occur and to repair or replace defective materials during the maintenance period;

4. The City hereby accepts the improvements; and

5. The City Manager is authorized to sign the Notice of Completion, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference.

On motion of Council Member _______________________, seconded by Council Member _______________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Marie Weber Tara Mazzanti
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Notice of Completion
411

EXHIBIT A
412
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.8
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Resolution amending the City of Livermore Salary Plan dated January 2024 to reflect adjustments to the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule to implement increased minimum wage in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5 and adding 1.0 FTE Public Works Supervisor to the Budgeted Personnel Allocations.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution amending the City of Livermore Salary Plan dated January 2024 to reflect increased minimum wage adjustments to the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule and adding 1.0 FTE Public Works Supervisor to the Budgeted Personnel Allocations.

SUMMARY
Staff recommends the following changes to the Salary Plan:

1. Amend the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule to increase the salary range of the Department Assistant, Field/Maintenance Aide, Law Clerk, and Police Cadet to $16.00 - $26.00 per hour based on an increase to the state minimum wage and adjustment to the top of the salary range;

2. Amend the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule to increase the minimum salary and create a salary range for the classification of Library Aide to $16.00 - $20.00 per hour;

3. Amend the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule to increase the salary ranges for the following classifications:

1. Temporary Librarian to $22.00 - $32.00 per hour

2. Temporary Library Assistant to $20.00 - $30.00 per hour

3. Temporary Library Clerk to $18.00 - $28.00 per hour

4. Delete Reserve Police Officer classification (Class Code 963);

5. Add 1.0 FTE Public Works Supervisor to the Public Works Department, Maintenance Services Division Budgeted Personnel Allocations.

DISCUSSION
413
The minimum wage law requires an annual review of the wage rate using the U.S. Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (U.S. CPI-W). The Department of Finance calculated that the U.S. CPI-W increased by 6.16 percent for the period from July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2023, compared to the prior 12-month period. The minimum wage increases each year by the lesser of 3.5 percent, and the rate of change in the averages of the two most recent U.S. CPI-W, unless those averages are negative. On July 31, 2023, Governor Newsom certified the minimum wage will increase to $16 per hour for all employers effective January 1, 2024. The minimum salary on the following classifications will be increased to $16 per hour effective January 1, 2024: Department Assistant, Field/Maintenance Aide, Law Clerk, Library Aide, and Police Cadet.

In addition, the City reviewed the salary ranges for all Unclassified and Hourly classifications. The ranges on some classifications hadn't been adjusted for over 15 years. Minor changes were made to the top of the ranges for the classifications of Department Assistant, Field/Maintenance Aide, Law Clerk, and Police Cadet. The Library recommended changes to the salary ranges for the Library Aide, Temporary Library Clerk, Temporary Library Assistant, and Temporary Librarian classifications. The salary range adjustments were changed to appropriately compensate employees for the work being done, to stay competitive, retain existing employees, and attract new temporary employees.

Reserve Police Officers perform a great service to the Police Department and the City. The Reserve Police Officer is a volunteer, unpaid position and does not receive any compensation for their service.

Staff is recommending removal of the classification from the salary plan. They will continue to serve as a volunteer in the Police Department.

The Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department recently completed a review of the Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) funding and determined funds are available to add a 1.0 fulltime Public Works Supervisor position. The new Public Works Supervisor will oversee all LMD activities to ensure each LMD is receiving optimal level of services including sidewalk and sound wall repairs.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The fiscal impact of these wage increases and adding a new 1.0 FTE will be approximately $260,000 and there are sufficient funds in the budget and LMDs to cover the cost.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City that Works
GOAL
8: Attract, develop, engage, and retain a diverse and highly skilled workforce across the organization

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - January 2024 Salary Plan
Prepared by: Kaylin Larson
HR Analyst II
414
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
415
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF LIVERMORE SALARY
PLAN DATED JANUARY 2024, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA
CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 2, SECTION 570.5, AND ADDING 1.0

FTE TO THE BUDGETED PERSONNEL ALLOCATIONS
The proposed City of Livermore Salary Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is intended to make the following amendments:
 Incorporate minimum wage increases and an expanded salary range of $16.00 - $26.00 per hour for the classifications of Department Assistant (Class Code 210), Field/Maintenance Aide (Class Code 438), Law Clerk (Class Code 240), and Police Cadet (Class Code 961);
 Incorporate minimum wage increases and create a salary range of $16.00 - $20.00 per hour for the classification of Library Aide (Class Code 920);  Incorporate adjustments to the salary ranges for the following classifications:
o Temporary Librarian (Class Code 915) - $22.00 - $32.00 per hour o Temporary Library Assistant (Class Code 916) - $20.00 - $30.00 per hour o Temporary Library Clerk (Class Code 917) - $18.00 - $28.00 per hour  Delete the Reserve Police Officer (Class Code 963) classification.

The Maintenance Division of the Public Works Department recently completed a review of the Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) funding and determined budget funds are available to add a full-time Public Works Supervisor position. The new Public Works Supervisor will oversee all LMD activities to ensure each LMD is receiving optimal level of services, including sidewalk and sound wall repairs.  Add 1.0 FTE Public Works Supervisor to the Public Works Department, Maintenance Services Division Budgeted Personnel Allocations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that, in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, it hereby approves the amended Salary Plan dated January 2024, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to modify the Unclassified and Hourly Salary Schedule, effective January 1, 2024, and to delete the Reserve Police Officer (Class Code 963) classification.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that an additional 1.0 FTE Public Works Supervisor is hereby added to the Public Works Department Maintenance Services Division to Budgeted Personnel Allocations.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:
416
RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Jason R. Alcala
Marie Weber Jason R. Alcala
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk City Attorney
Exhibit A – Salary Plan dated January 2024, Amended 12/11/2023 417
Salary
Plan
January 2024
Amended 12/11/2023

EXHIBIT A
418
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 221 01 ACCOUNT CLERK 66,819.84 70,054.84 73,441.56 76,997.62 80,731.49 Sch=M22 5,568.32 5,837.90 6,120.13 6,416.47 6,727.62
1,285.00 1,347.21 1,412.34 1,480.72 1,552.53

32.12492 33.68021 35.30844 37.01809 38.81322
225 02 ACCOUNT CLERK, JUNIOR 60,576.07 63,488.86 66,547.28 69,758.63 73,130.53 Sch=M22 5,048.01 5,290.74 5,545.61 5,813.22 6,094.21
1,164.92 1,220.94 1,279.76 1,341.51 1,406.36

29.12311 30.52349 31.99388 33.53780 35.15891
222 03 ACCOUNT CLERK, SENIOR 72,677.86 76,195.73 79,889.49 83,767.95 87,840.33 Sch=M22 6,056.49 6,349.64 6,657.46 6,980.66 7,320.03
1,397.65 1,465.30 1,536.34 1,610.92 1,689.24

34.94128 36.63256 38.40841 40.27305 42.23093
223 05 ACCOUNTANT, JUNIOR 86,792.41 91,054.48 95,529.67 100,228.61 105,162.51 Sch=M22 7,232.70 7,587.87 7,960.81 8,352.38 8,763.54
1,669.08 1,751.05 1,837.11 1,927.47 2,022.36

41.72712 43.77619 45.92773 48.18683 50.55890
224 04 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 77,171.53 80,914.10 84,843.78 88,969.95 93,302.44 Sch=M22 6,430.96 6,742.84 7,070.32 7,414.16 7,775.20
1,484.07 1,556.04 1,631.61 1,710.96 1,794.28

37.10170 38.90101 40.79028 42.77401 44.85694
213 14 ADMINISTRATIVE 80,842.05 84,768.14 88,890.52 93,219.04 97,763.97 Sch=M22 ASSISTANT 6,736.84 7,064.01 7,407.54 7,768.25 8,147.00 1,554.65 1,630.16 1,709.43 1,792.67 1,880.08

38.86637 40.75391 42.73583 44.81685 47.00191
211 50 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK I 60,576.11 63,488.90 66,547.33 69,758.67 73,130.58 Sch=M22 5,048.01 5,290.74 5,545.61 5,813.22 6,094.22
1,164.93 1,220.94 1,279.76 1,341.51 1,406.36

29.12313 30.52351 31.99391 33.53782 35.15893
214 49 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK II 64,925.25 68,055.49 71,342.24 74,793.35 78,416.99 Sch=M22 5,410.44 5,671.29 5,945.19 6,232.78 6,534.75
1,248.56 1,308.76 1,371.97 1,438.33 1,508.02

31.21406 32.71899 34.29915 35.95834 37.70048
206 06 ADMINISTRATIVE 80,842.05 84,768.14 88,890.52 93,219.04 97,763.97 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN 6,736.84 7,064.01 7,407.54 7,768.25 8,147.00 1,554.65 1,630.16 1,709.43 1,792.67 1,880.08

38.86637 40.75391 42.73583 44.81685 47.00191
471 01 AIRPORT SERVICE 70,739.04 74,159.99 77,751.97 81,523.55 85,483.71 Sch=PS1 ATTENDANT 5,894.92 6,180.00 6,479.33 6,793.63 7,123.64 1,360.37 1,426.15 1,495.23 1,567.76 1,643.92

34.00915 35.65384 37.38075 39.19401 41.09794
473 02 AIRPORT SERVICE 75,875.80 79,553.58 83,415.24 87,469.99 91,727.48 Sch=PS1 ATTENDANT SENIOR 6,322.98 6,629.47 6,951.27 7,289.17 7,643.96 1,459.15 1,529.88 1,604.14 1,682.12 1,763.99

36.47875 38.24691 40.10348 42.05288 44.09975

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

EXHIBIT A
419
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
290 07 ANIMAL CONTROL 80,206.76 84,101.09 88,190.12 92,483.60 96,991.75 Sch=M22 OFFICER 6,683.90 7,008.42 7,349.18 7,706.97 8,082.65 1,542.44 1,617.33 1,695.96 1,778.53 1,865.23

38.56094 40.43322 42.39910 44.46327 46.63065
465 66 ASSET MANAGEMENT 108,017.74 113,302.62 118,851.73 124,678.30 130,796.19 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST 9,001.48 9,441.89 9,904.31 10,389.86 10,899.68 2,077.26 2,178.90 2,285.61 2,397.66 2,515.31

51.93161 54.47241 57.14025 59.94149 62.88278
281 08 BUILDING INSPECTOR I 94,998.40 99,632.31 104,497.90 109,606.78 114,971.10 Sch=M22 7,916.53 8,302.69 8,708.16 9,133.90 9,580.93
1,826.89 1,916.01 2,009.58 2,107.82 2,210.98

45.67231 47.90015 50.23938 52.69557 55.27457
282 09 BUILDING INSPECTOR II 102,077.46 107,065.32 112,302.57 117,801.68 123,575.74 Sch=M22 8,506.46 8,922.11 9,358.55 9,816.81 10,297.98
1,963.03 2,058.95 2,159.66 2,265.42 2,376.46

49.07570 51.47371 53.99162 56.63542 59.41141
277 56 BUILDING INSPECTOR III 105,063.34 110,200.49 115,594.49 121,258.19 127,205.08 Sch=M22 8,755.28 9,183.37 9,632.87 10,104.85 10,600.42
2,020.45 2,119.24 2,222.97 2,331.89 2,446.25

50.51122 52.98100 55.57427 58.29721 61.15629
288 10 BUILDING INSPECTOR, 110,200.49 115,594.49 121,258.19 127,205.08 133,449.32 Sch=M22 SENIOR 9,183.37 9,632.87 10,104.85 10,600.42 11,120.78 2,119.24 2,222.97 2,331.89 2,446.25 2,566.33

52.98100 55.57427 58.29721 61.15629 64.15833
249 11 CIVIL ENGINEER, 113,280.25 118,828.25 124,653.63 130,770.30 137,192.81 Sch=M22 ASSISTANT 9,440.02 9,902.35 10,387.80 10,897.53 11,432.73 2,178.47 2,285.16 2,397.19 2,514.81 2,638.32

54.46166 57.12897 59.92963 62.87034 65.95808
254 12 CIVIL ENGINEER, 122,668.21 128,685.61 135,003.88 141,638.06 148,603.95 Sch=M22 ASSOCIATE 10,222.35 10,723.80 11,250.32 11,803.17 12,383.66 2,359.00 2,474.72 2,596.23 2,723.81 2,857.77

58.97510 61.86808 64.90571 68.09522 71.44421
247 13 CIVIL ENGINEER, JUNIOR 99,649.46 104,515.91 109,625.69 114,990.96 120,624.49 Sch=M22 8,304.12 8,709.66 9,135.47 9,582.58 10,052.04
1,916.34 2,009.92 2,108.19 2,211.36 2,319.70

47.90839 50.24803 52.70466 55.28412 57.99254
292 17 COMMUNITY 70,824.73 74,249.94 77,846.44 81,622.74 85,587.87 Sch=M22 SERVICE SPECIALIST 5,902.06 6,187.50 6,487.20 6,801.90 7,132.32 1,362.01 1,427.88 1,497.05 1,569.67 1,645.92

34.05035 35.69709 37.42617 39.24170 41.14801
294 19 CRIME & INTELLIGENCE 92,146.03 96,637.32 101,353.16 106,304.81 111,504.03 Sch=M22 ANALYST 7,678.84 8,053.11 8,446.10 8,858.73 9,292.00 1,772.04 1,858.41 1,949.10 2,044.32 2,144.31

44.30098 46.46025 48.72748 51.10808 53.60771

EXHIBIT A
420
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
296 62 CRIME PREVENTION 76,419.34 80,124.29 84,014.48 88,099.19 92,388.13 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST 6,368.28 6,677.02 7,001.21 7,341.60 7,699.01 1,469.60 1,540.85 1,615.66 1,694.22 1,776.69

36.74007 38.52129 40.39158 42.35538 44.41737
954 27 CRISIS INTERVENTION 97,716.37 102,602.19 107,732.30 113,118.91 118,774.86 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST 8,143.03 8,550.18 8,977.69 9,426.58 9,897.91 1,879.16 1,973.12 2,071.77 2,175.36 2,284.13

46.97902 49.32798 51.79437 54.38409 57.10330
208 21 DIVISION CLERK 68,410.33 71,714.84 75,184.57 78,827.77 82,653.16 Sch=M22 5,700.86 5,976.24 6,265.38 6,568.98 6,887.76
1,315.58 1,379.13 1,445.86 1,515.92 1,589.48

32.88958 34.47829 36.14643 37.89797 39.73710
234 64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 88,694.16 93,012.86 97,547.50 102,308.85 107,308.26 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST 7,391.18 7,751.07 8,128.96 8,525.74 8,942.36 1,705.66 1,788.71 1,875.91 1,967.48 2,063.62

42.64142 44.71772 46.89784 49.18695 51.59051
467 38 ELECTRICIAN 95,136.49 99,815.77 104,729.03 109,887.93 115,304.79 Sch=PS1 7,928.04 8,317.98 8,727.42 9,157.33 9,608.73
1,829.55 1,919.53 2,014.02 2,113.23 2,217.40

45.73870 47.98835 50.35050 52.83074 55.43500
255 23 ENGINEER, ASSISTANT 108,017.73 113,302.61 118,851.72 124,678.29 130,796.18 Sch=M22 9,001.48 9,441.88 9,904.31 10,389.86 10,899.68
2,077.26 2,178.90 2,285.61 2,397.66 2,515.31

51.93160 54.47241 57.14025 59.94149 62.88278
256 24 ENGINEER, JUNIOR 95,014.74 99,649.48 104,515.92 109,625.70 114,990.97 Sch=M22 7,917.90 8,304.12 8,709.66 9,135.48 9,582.58
1,827.21 1,916.34 2,009.92 2,108.19 2,211.36

45.68016 47.90840 50.24804 52.70466 55.28412
273 63 ENGINEERING SPECIALIST 108,017.73 113,302.61 118,851.72 124,678.29 130,796.18 Sch=M22 9,001.48 9,441.88 9,904.31 10,389.86 10,899.68
2,077.26 2,178.90 2,285.61 2,397.66 2,515.31

51.93160 54.47241 57.14025 59.94149 62.88278
284 25 ENGINEERING 92,947.14 97,478.47 102,236.38 107,232.19 112,477.78 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN, ASSIST 7,745.60 8,123.21 8,519.70 8,936.02 9,373.15 1,787.45 1,874.59 1,966.08 2,062.16 2,163.03

44.68613 46.86465 49.15211 51.55394 54.07586
275 26 ENGINEERING 99,649.46 104,515.91 109,625.69 114,990.96 120,624.49 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN, ASSOC 8,304.12 8,709.66 9,135.47 9,582.58 10,052.04 1,916.34 2,009.92 2,108.19 2,211.36 2,319.70

47.90839 50.24803 52.70466 55.28412 57.99254
279 28 ENGINEERING 103,509.58 108,569.05 113,881.48 119,459.54 125,316.50 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 8,625.80 9,047.42 9,490.12 9,954.96 10,443.04 1,990.57 2,087.87 2,190.03 2,297.30 2,409.93

49.76422 52.19666 54.75071 57.43247 60.24832

EXHIBIT A
421
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
410 40 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 60,247.85 63,144.22 66,185.42 69,378.67 72,731.59 Sch=PS1 TRAINEE 5,020.65 5,262.02 5,515.45 5,781.56 6,060.97 1,158.61 1,214.31 1,272.80 1,334.21 1,398.68

28.96531 30.35780 31.81991 33.35513 34.96711
411 41 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 67,430.13 70,685.61 74,103.86 77,693.04 81,461.68 Sch=PS1 WORKER I 5,619.18 5,890.47 6,175.32 6,474.42 6,788.47 1,296.73 1,359.34 1,425.07 1,494.10 1,566.57

32.41833 33.98347 35.62686 37.35242 39.16427
412 42 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 72,289.11 75,787.55 79,460.91 83,317.95 87,367.82 Sch=PS1 WORKER II 6,024.09 6,315.63 6,621.74 6,943.16 7,280.65 1,390.18 1,457.45 1,528.09 1,602.27 1,680.15

34.75438 36.43632 38.20236 40.05671 42.00376
413 43 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 75,875.80 79,553.58 83,415.24 87,469.99 91,727.48 Sch=PS1 WORKER, SENIOR 6,322.98 6,629.47 6,951.27 7,289.17 7,643.96 1,459.15 1,529.88 1,604.14 1,682.12 1,763.99

36.47875 38.24691 40.10348 42.05288 44.09975
414 20 FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 85,349.29 89,500.73 93,859.75 98,436.73 103,242.55 Sch=PS1 WORKER, SUPERVISING 7,112.44 7,458.39 7,821.65 8,203.06 8,603.55 1,641.33 1,721.17 1,805.00 1,893.01 1,985.43

41.03331 43.02920 45.12488 47.32535 49.63584
950 18 FAMILY THERAPIST 93,505.05 98,064.29 102,851.49 107,878.04 113,155.93 Sch=M22 7,792.09 8,172.02 8,570.96 8,989.84 9,429.66
1,798.17 1,885.85 1,977.91 2,074.58 2,176.08

44.95435 47.14629 49.44783 51.86444 54.40189
444 51 FLEET SERVICES WORKER 60,247.89 63,144.27 66,185.47 69,378.72 72,731.64 Sch=PS1 5,020.66 5,262.02 5,515.46 5,781.56 6,060.97
1,158.61 1,214.31 1,272.80 1,334.21 1,398.69

28.96533 30.35782 31.81994 33.35515 34.96713
274 59 GIS SPECIALIST 108,017.73 113,302.59 118,851.71 124,678.28 130,796.17 Sch=M22 9,001.48 9,441.88 9,904.31 10,389.86 10,899.68
2,077.26 2,178.90 2,285.61 2,397.66 2,515.31

51.93160 54.47240 57.14025 59.94148 62.88277
420 11 GROUNDSKEEPER 60,247.85 63,144.22 66,185.41 69,378.66 72,731.58 Sch=PS1 TRAINEE 5,020.65 5,262.02 5,515.45 5,781.56 6,060.97 1,158.61 1,214.31 1,272.80 1,334.21 1,398.68

28.96531 30.35780 31.81991 33.35513 34.96711
421 12 GROUNDSKEEPER I 67,430.13 70,685.61 74,103.86 77,693.04 81,461.68 Sch=PS1 5,619.18 5,890.47 6,175.32 6,474.42 6,788.47
1,296.73 1,359.34 1,425.07 1,494.10 1,566.57

32.41833 33.98347 35.62686 37.35242 39.16427
422 13 GROUNDSKEEPER II 72,289.11 75,787.56 79,460.91 83,317.95 87,367.82 Sch=PS1 6,024.09 6,315.63 6,621.74 6,943.16 7,280.65
1,390.18 1,457.45 1,528.09 1,602.27 1,680.15

34.75438 36.43633 38.20236 40.05671 42.00376

EXHIBIT A
422
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
423 14 GROUNDSKEEPER III 75,875.80 79,553.58 83,415.24 87,469.99 91,727.48 Sch=PS1 6,322.98 6,629.47 6,951.27 7,289.17 7,643.96
1,459.15 1,529.88 1,604.14 1,682.12 1,763.99

36.47875 38.24691 40.10348 42.05288 44.09975
424 04 GROUNDSKEEPER, 85,349.29 89,500.73 93,859.75 98,436.73 103,242.55 Sch=PS1 SUPERVISING 7,112.44 7,458.39 7,821.65 8,203.06 8,603.55 1,641.33 1,721.17 1,805.00 1,893.01 1,985.43

41.03331 43.02920 45.12488 47.32535 49.63584
228 16 INFORMATION 80,654.75 84,609.95 88,762.91 93,123.52 97,702.15 Sch=M22 TECHNOLOGY TECHNICIAN 6,721.23 7,050.83 7,396.91 7,760.29 8,141.85 1,551.05 1,627.11 1,706.98 1,790.84 1,878.89

38.77632 40.67786 42.67448 44.77092 46.97219
271 57 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 88,499.94 92,847.39 97,412.22 102,205.29 107,238.01 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 7,375.00 7,737.28 8,117.69 8,517.11 8,936.50 1,701.92 1,785.53 1,873.31 1,965.49 2,062.27

42.54805 44.63817 46.83280 49.13716 51.55674
426 52 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 81,112.97 85,052.59 89,189.20 93,532.64 98,093.25 Sch=PS1 SPECIALIST 6,759.41 7,087.72 7,432.43 7,794.39 8,174.44 1,559.86 1,635.63 1,715.18 1,798.70 1,886.41

38.99662 40.89067 42.87942 44.96762 47.16022
263 29 LIBRARIAN I 73,089.45 76,627.91 80,343.28 84,244.43 88,340.63 Sch=M22 6,090.79 6,385.66 6,695.27 7,020.37 7,361.72
1,405.57 1,473.61 1,545.06 1,620.09 1,698.86

35.13916 36.84034 38.62658 40.50213 42.47146
260 30 LIBRARIAN II 80,998.52 84,932.43 89,063.03 93,400.16 97,954.15 Sch=M22 6,749.88 7,077.70 7,421.92 7,783.35 8,162.85
1,557.66 1,633.32 1,712.75 1,796.16 1,883.73

38.94160 40.83290 42.81876 44.90392 47.09334
242 32 LIBRARY ASSISTANT 68,828.76 72,154.18 75,645.87 79,312.15 83,161.75 Sch=M22 5,735.73 6,012.85 6,303.82 6,609.35 6,930.15
1,323.63 1,387.58 1,454.73 1,525.23 1,599.26

33.09075 34.68951 36.36821 38.13084 39.98161
243 33 LIBRARY ASSISTANT, 77,171.53 80,914.10 84,843.78 88,969.95 93,302.44 Sch=M22 SUPERVISING 6,430.96 6,742.84 7,070.32 7,414.16 7,775.20 1,484.07 1,556.04 1,631.61 1,710.96 1,794.28

37.10170 38.90101 40.79028 42.77401 44.85694
241 34 LIBRARY CLERK 60,576.11 63,488.90 66,547.33 69,758.67 73,130.58 Sch=M22 5,048.01 5,290.74 5,545.61 5,813.22 6,094.22
1,164.93 1,220.94 1,279.76 1,341.51 1,406.36

29.12313 30.52351 31.99391 33.53782 35.15893
400 16 MAINTENANCE 60,247.85 63,144.22 66,185.41 69,378.66 72,731.58 Sch=PS1 TRAINEE 5,020.65 5,262.02 5,515.45 5,781.56 6,060.97 1,158.61 1,214.31 1,272.80 1,334.21 1,398.68

28.96531 30.35780 31.81991 33.35513 34.96711

EXHIBIT A
423
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
401 17 MAINTENANCE 67,430.13 70,685.61 74,103.86 77,693.04 81,461.68 Sch=PS1 WORKER I 5,619.18 5,890.47 6,175.32 6,474.42 6,788.47 1,296.73 1,359.34 1,425.07 1,494.10 1,566.57

32.41833 33.98347 35.62686 37.35242 39.16427
402 18 MAINTENANCE 72,289.11 75,787.55 79,460.91 83,317.95 87,367.82 Sch=PS1 WORKER II 6,024.09 6,315.63 6,621.74 6,943.16 7,280.65 1,390.18 1,457.45 1,528.09 1,602.27 1,680.15

34.75438 36.43632 38.20236 40.05671 42.00376
403 19 MAINTENANCE 75,875.80 79,553.58 83,415.24 87,469.99 91,727.48 Sch=PS1 WORKER III 6,322.98 6,629.47 6,951.27 7,289.17 7,643.96 1,459.15 1,529.88 1,604.14 1,682.12 1,763.99

36.47875 38.24691 40.10348 42.05288 44.09975
442 22 MECHANIC 83,676.63 87,744.45 92,015.64 96,500.41 101,209.42 Sch=PS1 6,973.05 7,312.04 7,667.97 8,041.70 8,434.12
1,609.17 1,687.39 1,769.53 1,855.78 1,946.34

40.22915 42.18483 44.23829 46.39443 48.65838
440 23 MECHANIC SENIOR 90,843.18 95,269.32 99,916.76 104,796.59 109,920.41 Sch=PS1 7,570.27 7,939.11 8,326.40 8,733.05 9,160.03
1,746.98 1,832.10 1,921.48 2,015.32 2,113.85

43.67461 45.80256 48.03690 50.38298 52.84635
251 15 NEIGHBORHOOD 99,649.46 104,515.91 109,625.69 114,990.96 120,624.49 Sch=M22 PRESERVATION OFFICER 8,304.12 8,709.66 9,135.47 9,582.58 10,052.04 1,916.34 2,009.92 2,108.19 2,211.36 2,319.70

47.90839 50.24803 52.70466 55.28412 57.99254
407 03 PARTS AND INVENTORY 70,559.98 73,971.95 77,554.53 81,316.24 85,266.04 Sch=PS1 CONTROL WORKER 5,880.00 6,164.33 6,462.88 6,776.35 7,105.50 1,356.92 1,422.54 1,491.43 1,563.77 1,639.73

33.92307 35.56344 37.28583 39.09435 40.99329
287 37 PERMIT TECHNICIAN 71,853.77 75,330.44 78,980.95 82,813.98 86,838.67 Sch=M22 5,987.81 6,277.54 6,581.75 6,901.17 7,236.56
1,381.80 1,448.66 1,518.86 1,592.58 1,669.97

34.54508 36.21656 37.97161 39.81441 41.74936
291 60 PERMIT TECHNICIAN II 76,721.09 80,441.12 84,347.17 88,448.50 92,754.90 Sch=M22 6,393.42 6,703.43 7,028.93 7,370.71 7,729.58
1,475.41 1,546.94 1,622.06 1,700.93 1,783.75

36.88514 38.67362 40.55152 42.52332 44.59370
252 38 PLAN CHECK ENGINEER 122,565.32 128,577.57 134,890.42 141,518.94 148,478.88 Sch=M22 10,213.78 10,714.80 11,240.87 11,793.25 12,373.24 2,357.03 2,472.65 2,594.05 2,721.52 2,855.36

58.92563 61.81614 64.85116 68.03795 71.38408
258 41 PLANNER, ASSISTANT 99,348.37 104,199.78 109,293.75 114,642.43 120,258.52 Sch=M22 8,279.03 8,683.32 9,107.81 9,553.54 10,021.54
1,910.55 2,003.84 2,101.80 2,204.66 2,312.66

47.76364 50.09605 52.54507 55.11655 57.81660

EXHIBIT A
424
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
257 42 PLANNER, ASSOCIATE 114,642.43 120,258.52 126,155.43 132,347.19 138,848.53 Sch=M22 9,553.54 10,021.54 10,512.95 11,028.93 11,570.71 2,204.66 2,312.66 2,426.07 2,545.14 2,670.16

55.11655 57.81660 60.65165 63.62846 66.75410
261 22 PLANNER, SENIOR 120,258.55 126,155.45 132,347.21 138,848.55 145,674.96 Sch=M22 10,021.55 10,512.95 11,028.93 11,570.71 12,139.58 2,312.66 2,426.07 2,545.14 2,670.16 2,801.44

57.81661 60.65166 63.62847 66.75411 70.03604
231 43 POLICE CLERK 66,569.99 69,782.46 73,155.58 76,697.35 80,416.19 Sch=M22 5,547.50 5,815.21 6,096.30 6,391.45 6,701.35
1,280.19 1,341.97 1,406.84 1,474.95 1,546.47

32.00480 33.54926 35.17095 36.87373 38.66163
229 20 POLICE CLERK, 69,782.54 73,155.65 76,697.42 80,416.26 84,321.07 Sch=M22 SENIOR 5,815.21 6,096.30 6,391.45 6,701.36 7,026.76 1,341.97 1,406.84 1,474.95 1,546.47 1,621.56

33.54930 35.17099 36.87376 38.66166 40.53898
230 52 POLICE CLERK, 82,386.88 86,390.21 90,593.70 95,007.38 99,641.73 Sch=M22 SUPERVISING 6,865.57 7,199.18 7,549.48 7,917.28 8,303.48 1,584.36 1,661.35 1,742.19 1,827.07 1,916.19

39.60908 41.53375 43.55466 45.67663 47.90468
237 55 POLICE IDENTIFICATION 83,941.57 88,022.62 92,307.74 96,807.11 101,531.46 Sch=M22 TECHNICIAN 6,995.13 7,335.22 7,692.31 8,067.26 8,460.96 1,614.26 1,692.74 1,775.15 1,861.68 1,952.53

40.35652 42.31857 44.37872 46.54188 48.81320
215 36 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE 70,824.73 74,249.94 77,846.44 81,622.74 85,587.87 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST 5,902.06 6,187.50 6,487.20 6,801.90 7,132.32 1,362.01 1,427.88 1,497.05 1,569.67 1,645.92

34.05035 35.69709 37.42617 39.24170 41.14801
236 54 PROPERTY AND EVIDENCE 80,054.86 83,941.59 88,022.64 92,307.76 96,807.13 Sch=M22 SPECIALIST, SUPERVISING 6,671.24 6,995.13 7,335.22 7,692.31 8,067.26 1,539.52 1,614.26 1,692.74 1,775.15 1,861.68

38.48791 40.35653 42.31858 44.37873 46.54189
235 44 PUBLIC SAFETY 82,386.88 86,390.21 90,593.70 95,007.38 99,641.73 Sch=M22 DISPATCHER 6,865.57 7,199.18 7,549.48 7,917.28 8,303.48 1,584.36 1,661.35 1,742.19 1,827.07 1,916.19

39.60908 41.53375 43.55466 45.67663 47.90468
245 31 PUBLIC SAFETY 86,390.17 90,593.66 95,007.33 99,641.69 104,507.76 Sch=M22 DISPATCHER, SENIOR 7,199.18 7,549.47 7,917.28 8,303.47 8,708.98 1,661.35 1,742.19 1,827.06 1,916.19 2,009.76

41.53374 43.55464 45.67660 47.90466 50.24412
238 45 PUBLIC SAFETY 95,060.69 99,697.72 104,566.58 109,678.90 115,046.82 Sch=M22 DISPATCHER, SUPERVISING 7,921.72 8,308.14 8,713.88 9,139.91 9,587.24 1,828.09 1,917.26 2,010.90 2,109.21 2,212.44

45.70225 47.93160 50.27239 52.73024 55.31097

EXHIBIT A
425
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
220 46 PURCHASING SPECIALIST 78,035.59 81,821.35 85,796.40 89,970.21 94,352.71 Sch=M22 6,502.97 6,818.45 7,149.70 7,497.52 7,862.73
1,500.68 1,573.49 1,649.93 1,730.20 1,814.48

37.51711 39.33719 41.24827 43.25491 45.36188
233 65 RECYCLING SPECIALIST 88,694.15 93,012.84 97,547.48 102,308.83 107,308.24 Sch=M22 7,391.18 7,751.07 8,128.96 8,525.74 8,942.35
1,705.66 1,788.71 1,875.91 1,967.48 2,063.62

42.64142 44.71771 46.89783 49.18694 51.59050
405 39 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 73,126.04 76,666.33 80,383.63 84,286.80 88,385.12 Sch=PS1 TECHNICIAN TRAINEE 6,093.84 6,388.86 6,698.64 7,023.90 7,365.43 1,406.27 1,474.35 1,545.84 1,620.90 1,699.71

35.15675 36.85881 38.64598 40.52250 42.49285
406 24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 78,082.45 81,870.55 85,848.08 90,024.46 94,409.68 Sch=PS1 TECHNICIAN 6,506.87 6,822.55 7,154.01 7,502.04 7,867.47 1,501.59 1,574.43 1,650.92 1,731.24 1,815.57

37.53964 39.36084 41.27312 43.28099 45.38927
408 53 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 85,349.29 89,500.73 93,859.75 98,436.73 103,242.55 Sch=PS1 TECHNICIAN, SENIOR 7,112.44 7,458.39 7,821.65 8,203.06 8,603.55 1,641.33 1,721.17 1,805.00 1,893.01 1,985.43

41.03331 43.02920 45.12488 47.32535 49.63584
248 53 TRANSPORTATION 122,668.21 128,685.61 135,003.88 141,638.06 148,603.95 Sch=M22 ENGINEER, ASSOCIATE 10,222.35 10,723.80 11,250.32 11,803.17 12,383.66 2,359.00 2,474.72 2,596.23 2,723.81 2,857.77

58.97510 61.86808 64.90571 68.09522 71.44421
396 44 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 60,247.85 63,144.22 66,185.41 69,378.66 72,731.58 Sch=PS1 SYSTEMS TRAINEE 5,020.65 5,262.02 5,515.45 5,781.56 6,060.97 1,158.61 1,214.31 1,272.80 1,334.21 1,398.68

28.96531 30.35780 31.81991 33.35513 34.96711
397 45 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 69,594.68 72,996.87 76,569.18 80,320.10 84,258.56 Sch=PS1 SYSTEMS WORKER I 5,799.56 6,083.07 6,380.77 6,693.34 7,021.55 1,338.36 1,403.79 1,472.48 1,544.62 1,620.36

33.45898 35.09465 36.81211 38.61543 40.50892
398 46 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 76,388.79 80,130.69 84,059.69 88,185.13 92,516.85 Sch=PS1 SYSTEMS WORKER II 6,365.73 6,677.56 7,004.97 7,348.76 7,709.74 1,469.02 1,540.97 1,616.53 1,695.87 1,779.17

36.72538 38.52437 40.41331 42.39670 44.47925
399 47 WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS 83,900.11 88,017.58 92,340.92 96,880.43 101,646.90 Sch=PS1 SYSTEMS WORKER III 6,991.68 7,334.80 7,695.08 8,073.37 8,470.58 1,613.46 1,692.65 1,775.79 1,863.09 1,954.75

40.33659 42.31614 44.39467 46.57713 48.86870
445 15 WATER DISTRIBUTION 64,302.75 67,401.88 70,655.96 74,072.74 77,660.37 Sch=PS1 OPERATOR TRAINEE 5,358.56 5,616.82 5,888.00 6,172.73 6,471.70 1,236.59 1,296.19 1,358.77 1,424.48 1,493.47

30.91478 32.40475 33.96921 35.61189 37.33672

EXHIBIT A
426
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
446 32 WATER DISTRIBUTION 71,988.60 75,472.00 79,129.58 82,970.05 87,002.53 Sch=PS1 OPERATOR I 5,999.05 6,289.33 6,594.13 6,914.17 7,250.21 1,384.40 1,451.38 1,521.72 1,595.58 1,673.13

34.60990 36.28462 38.04307 39.88945 41.82814
447 33 WATER DISTRIBUTION 82,438.82 86,444.75 90,650.97 95,067.50 99,704.85 Sch=PS1 OPERATOR II 6,869.90 7,203.73 7,554.25 7,922.29 8,308.74 1,585.36 1,662.40 1,743.29 1,828.22 1,917.40

39.63405 41.55998 43.58220 45.70553 47.93502
448 34 WATER DISTRIBUTION 88,848.28 93,174.67 97,717.40 102,487.26 107,495.59 Sch=PS1 OPERATOR III 7,404.02 7,764.56 8,143.12 8,540.61 8,957.97 1,708.62 1,791.82 1,879.18 1,970.91 2,067.22

42.71552 44.79551 46.97952 49.27272 51.68057
470 05 WATER DISTRIBUTION 93,174.69 97,717.42 102,487.28 107,495.61 112,754.39 Sch=PS1 SENIOR OPERATOR 7,764.56 8,143.12 8,540.61 8,957.97 9,396.20 1,791.82 1,879.18 1,970.91 2,067.22 2,168.35

44.79552 46.97953 49.27273 51.68058 54.20884
469 06 WATER DISTRIBUTION 102,260.14 107,257.14 112,503.97 118,013.15 123,797.80 Sch=PS1 SUPERVISING OPERATOR 8,521.68 8,938.10 9,375.33 9,834.43 10,316.48 1,966.54 2,062.64 2,163.54 2,269.48 2,380.73

49.16353 51.56593 54.08845 56.73709 59.51817
456 37 WATER RESOURCES 96,076.78 100,803.07 105,765.69 110,976.43 116,447.72 Sch=PS1 COORDINATOR 8,006.40 8,400.26 8,813.81 9,248.04 9,703.98 1,847.63 1,938.52 2,033.96 2,134.16 2,239.38

46.19076 48.46301 50.84889 53.35405 55.98448
454 WATER RESOURCES 99,815.77 104,729.03 109,887.93 115,304.79 120,992.50 Sch=PS1 COORDINATOR - ELECTRICAL & 8,317.98 8,727.42 9,157.33 9,608.73 10,082.71 INSTRUMENTATION 1,919.53 2,014.02 2,113.23 2,217.40 2,326.78

47.98835 50.35050 52.83074 55.43500 58.16947
463 25 WR INSTRUMENT 90,803.82 95,266.47 99,952.26 104,872.33 110,038.40 Sch=PS1 CONTROL TECHNICIAN 7,566.99 7,938.87 8,329.36 8,739.36 9,169.87 1,746.23 1,832.05 1,922.16 2,016.78 2,116.12

43.65568 45.80119 48.05397 50.41939 52.90308
462 26 WR LABORATORY 86,768.80 91,029.71 95,503.66 100,201.29 105,133.82 Sch=PS1 TECHNICIAN 7,230.73 7,585.81 7,958.64 8,350.11 8,761.15 1,668.63 1,750.57 1,836.61 1,926.95 2,021.80

41.71577 43.76428 45.91522 48.17370 50.54511
458 27 WR MECHANIC I 81,088.31 85,103.86 89,320.19 93,747.33 98,395.83 Sch=PS1 6,757.36 7,091.99 7,443.35 7,812.28 8,199.65
1,559.39 1,636.61 1,717.70 1,802.83 1,892.23

38.98476 40.91532 42.94240 45.07083 47.30569
459 28 WR MECHANIC II 91,455.39 95,989.29 100,749.89 105,748.52 110,997.08 Sch=PS1 7,621.28 7,999.11 8,395.82 8,812.38 9,249.76
1,758.76 1,845.95 1,937.50 2,033.63 2,134.56

43.96894 46.14870 48.43745 50.84063 53.36398

EXHIBIT A
427
CLASS

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ASSOCIATION OF LIVERMORE EMPLOYEES
EFFECTIVE 10/09/2023
SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES
451 29 WR OPERATOR - GRADE I 81,895.01 85,873.73 90,051.41 94,437.95 99,043.82 Sch=PS1 6,824.58 7,156.14 7,504.28 7,869.83 8,253.65
1,574.90 1,651.42 1,731.76 1,816.11 1,904.69

39.37260 41.28545 43.29395 45.40286 47.61722
453 48 WR OPERATOR - GRADE II 85,863.06 90,040.19 94,426.19 99,031.47 103,867.03 Sch=PS1 7,155.26 7,503.35 7,868.85 8,252.62 8,655.59
1,651.21 1,731.54 1,815.89 1,904.45 1,997.44

41.28032 43.28855 45.39721 47.61128 49.93607
452 30 WR OPERATOR - GRADE III 92,663.41 97,180.57 101,923.58 106,903.74 112,132.90 Sch=PS1 7,721.95 8,098.38 8,493.63 8,908.65 9,344.41
1,781.99 1,868.86 1,960.07 2,055.84 2,156.40

44.54972 46.72143 49.00172 51.39603 53.91005
455 31 WR OPERATOR - TRAINEE 69,215.90 72,560.68 76,072.70 79,760.32 83,632.32 Sch=PS1 5,767.99 6,046.72 6,339.39 6,646.69 6,969.36
1,331.08 1,395.40 1,462.94 1,533.85 1,608.31

33.27688 34.88494 36.57341 38.34631 40.20785
457 49 WR SENIOR OPERATOR 97,194.51 101,938.23 106,919.11 112,149.05 117,640.49 Sch=PS1 8,099.54 8,494.85 8,909.93 9,345.75 9,803.37
1,869.13 1,960.35 2,056.14 2,156.71 2,262.32

46.72813 49.00876 51.40342 53.91781 56.55793
461 35 WR SOURCE CONTROL 91,164.82 95,645.53 100,350.26 105,290.23 110,477.21 Sch=PS1 INSPECTOR 7,597.07 7,970.46 8,362.52 8,774.19 9,206.43 1,753.17 1,839.34 1,929.81 2,024.81 2,124.56

43.82924 45.98343 48.24532 50.62030 53.11404
460 36 WR SOURCE CONTROL 85,835.21 90,010.96 94,395.49 98,999.24 103,833.18 Sch=PS1 TECHNICIAN 7,152.93 7,500.91 7,866.29 8,249.94 8,652.77 1,650.68 1,730.98 1,815.30 1,903.83 1,996.79

41.26693 43.27450 45.38245 47.59579 49.91980
464 50 WR SUPERVISING 106,674.96 111,892.68 117,371.29 123,123.84 129,164.01 Sch=PS1 OPERATOR 8,889.58 9,324.39 9,780.94 10,260.32 10,763.67 2,051.44 2,151.78 2,257.14 2,367.77 2,483.92

51.28604 53.79456 56.42850 59.19415 62.09808
952 51 YOUTH SERVICES CASE 85,414.84 89,569.56 93,932.04 98,512.62 103,322.24 Sch=M22 COORDINATOR 7,117.90 7,464.13 7,827.67 8,209.39 8,610.19 1,642.59 1,722.49 1,806.39 1,894.47 1,986.97

41.06483 43.06229 45.15963 47.36184 49.67415

EXHIBIT A
428
Schedule = P14
CLASS SALARY RANGE @ ANNUAL, MONTHLY, WEEKLY, HRLY RATES

CODE RANGE CLASSIFICATION STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 604 01 POLICE OFFICER 110,921.89 116,467.98 122,291.38 128,405.95 134,826.25 9,243.49 9,705.67 10,190.95 10,700.50 11,235.52
2133.11 2239.77 2351.76 2469.35 2592.81

53.32783 55.99422 58.79393 61.73363 64.82031
603 02 POLICE SERGEANT 138,020.86 144,921.90 152,168.00 159,776.40 167,765.22 11,501.74 12,076.83 12,680.67 13,314.70 13,980.44
2654.25 2786.96 2926.31 3072.62 3226.25

66.35618 69.67399 73.15769 76.81558 80.65636
606 03 POLICE TRAINEE 38.85135 - - - -
(Non-Sworn)

CITY OF LIVERMORE

POLICE OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION
EFFECTIVE 01/01/2024

2. LPOA January 1, 2024
10/12/2023 Page 1 of 1

EXHIBIT A
429

MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$7,730 - $17,650/month
Effective July 3, 2023
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range
$14,095.31 - $17,619.14
119 Assistant Administrative Services Director
100 Assistant City Attorney
132 Assistant Community Development Director
129 Assistant Public Works Director
124 City Engineer
$13,112.20 - $16,390.25
250 Assistant City Engineer
289 Building Official
218 Finance Manager
125 Maintenance and Golf Operations Manager
118 Planning Manager
449 Water Resources Division Manager
$12,465.09 - $15,581.36
472 Airport Manager*
123 Housing & Human Services Manager
$12,335.20 - $15,419.00
246 Senior Transportation Engineer
$11,836.61 - $14,795.76
283 Permit Center Manager
$11,812.81 - $14,766.01
253 Senior Civil Engineer
$11,671.70 - $14,589.63
269 IT Operations Manager
268 Information Technology Manager
$11,331.75 - $14,164.69
136 City Clerk
134 Housing Programs Manager
135 Human Services Programs Manager
297 Police Support Services Manager
259 Principal Planner
951 Youth and Family Services Manager - Clinical
$10,698.76 - $13,373.45
137 Assistant Finance Manager
130 Assistant Library Director
120 Economic Development Manager
278 Inspection & Neighborhood Preservation Manager
450 Water Resources Operations Manager
474 Water Resources Technical Programs Manager
953 Youth and Family Services Manager - Programs

CITY OF LIVERMORE

EXHIBIT A
430

MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$7,730 - $17,650/month
Effective July 3, 2023
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range

CITY OF LIVERMORE
$10,170.15 - $12,712.69
217 Accounting Supervisor
232 Information Technology Coordinator
148 Management Analyst, Senior
133 Public Works Manager
270 Systems Administrator
468 Water Distribution Operations Manager
$10,062.21 - $12,577.76
272 Construction Inspection Manager
$10,016.28 - $12,520.35
128 Deputy City Attorney
295 Police Business Services Manager
293 Police Facility & Equipment Manager
$9,505.31 - $11,881.64
131 Assistant City Clerk
150 Management Analyst II
298 Police Media & Community Relations Analyst
126 Public Works Supervisor
$7,730.03 - $9,662.54
207 Deputy City Clerk
152 Management Analyst I
264 Supervising Librarian
466 Water Resources Communications Representative
*Airport Manager moved salary bands effective November 20, 2023

EXHIBIT A
431
Class
Code Classification
113 Assistant City Attorney, Senior (Confidential) $15,196.70 - $18,995.88 104 Assistant to the City Manager (Confidential) $12,465.09 - $15,581.36 122 Human Resources Manager (Confidential) $13,112.20 - $16,390.25 154 Human Resources Analyst, Senior (Confidential) $10,170.15 - $12,712.69 155 Human Resources Analyst II (Confidential) $9,505.31 - $11,881.64 156 Human Resources Analyst I (Confidential) $7,730.03 - $9,662.54 149 Management Analyst, Senior (Confidential) $10,170.15 - $12,712.69 151 Management Analyst II (Confidential) $9,505.31 - $11,881.64 153 Management Analyst I (Confidential) $7,730.03 - $9,662.54 127 Risk Manager (Confidential)* $11,480.26 - $14,350.33 *Moved from Management Group effective 09/11/2023

CITY OF LIVERMORE
Monthly Salary Range
Effective July 3, 2023
$7,730 - $19,000/month

MANAGEMENT CONFIDENTIAL SALARY SCHEDULE

EXHIBIT A
432
Class
Code Classifications
216 Administrative Receptionist $5,120.02 - $6,400.02
203 Administrative Specialist I $5,926.26 - $7,407.83
227 Administrative Specialist II $6,665.14 - $8,331.43
200 Executive Assistant $8,532.40 - $10,665.50
226 Human Resources Clerk I $5,926.26 - $7,407.83
212 Human Resources Clerk II $6,519.55 - $8,149.44
219 Human Resources Technician $7,153.66 - $8,942.08
201 Law Office Supervisor $8,532.40 - $10,665.50
204 Legal Assistant $7,085.67 - $8,857.09
Monthly Salary Range

CITY OF LIVERMORE

CONFIDENTIAL SALARY SCHEDULE
$5,120 - $10,670/month
Effective July 3, 2023

EXHIBIT A
433

CITY OF LIVERMORE

POLICE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$14,500 - $22,480/month
Effective January 1, 2024
Class
Code Classification Salary Range
605 Police Captain $17,983.66 - $22,479.58
602 Police Lieutenant $14,501.26 - $18,126.57

EXHIBIT A
434
Class
Code Classification Monthly Salary Range
109 Administrative Services Director $16,435.43 - $20,544.29 103 Assistant City Manager $17,729.26 - $22,161.58
105 Community Development Director $16,435.43 - $20,544.29 106 Deputy City Manager $14,095.31 - $17,619.14
117 Deputy City Manager/City Clerk* $14,095.31 - $17,619.14 114 Innovation and Economic Development Director $16,435.43 - $20,544.29 121 Library Services Director $16,435.43 - $20,544.29
107 Police Chief** $20,332.79 - $25,415.99
111 Public Works Director $16,435.43 - $20,544.29
**Police Chief 5% Salary Adjustment effective 1/1/2024

CITY OF LIVERMORE

EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SALARY SCHEDULE
$14,095 - $25,416/month
Effective November 20, 2023

EXHIBIT A
435

CITY OF LIVERMORE

APPOINTED MANAGEMENT
Class
Code Classification Annual Salary Effective
102 City Manager $344,796 11/20/2023
112 City Attorney $307,580 11/20/2023

EXHIBIT A
436

CITY OF LIVERMORE

UNCLASSIFIED AND HOURLY SALARY SCHEDULE
Class
Code Classification Salary Range Effective Date
210 Department Assistant $16.00 - $26.00 Hourly 01/01/24 438 Field/Maintenance Aide $16.00 - $26.00 Hourly 01/01/24 240 Law Clerk $16.00 - $26.00 Hourly 01/01/24
915 Temporary Librarian $22.00 - $32.00 Hourly 01/01/24 916 Temporary Library Assistant $20.00 - $30.00 Hourly 01/01/24 917 Temporary Library Clerk $18.00 - $28.00 Hourly 01/01/24 920 Library Aide $16.00 - $20.00 Hourly 01/01/24
961 Police Cadet $16.00 - $26.00 Hourly 01/01/24
956 Special Projects Coordinator $20.00 - $100.00 Hourly 12/20/21

EXHIBIT A
437
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.9
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Resolution making findings regarding the continuing need for unexpended balances of Development Impact Fees as of June 30, 2023, and accepting the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution making findings regarding the continuing need for unexpended balances of Development Impact Fees as of June 30, 2023 and accepting the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

SUMMARY
California Government Code § 66000-66013 specifies accountability and annual reporting requirements pertaining to development fees. According to statute, the report must be reviewed at a public meeting.

The report must include a description of the fee type in the account; the amount of the fee; beginning and ending balances; fee and interest income; expenditures by improvement, showing the amount funded by the fees; describe loans or transfers, including purpose, interest rate, and term; and any refunds. The report may make findings as necessary as to whether funds are available to construct incomplete improvements.

DISCUSSION
California Government Code § 66000 (adopted as AB1600) discusses developmental fees, what they are and how they are to be used. Developmental fees under AB1600 are not a tax or special assessment but a monetary exaction that is charged by a local agency to the applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project. Specifically, under California Government Code § 66006, the local agency that receives the fee must deposit it in a separate capital facilities account or fund in a manner to avoid commingling of the fees with other revenues. The fees must then be expended solely for the purpose for which they were collected. For each account established for the fees, the local agency must make available to the public a brief description of the fee within the fund, the amount of the fee along with the 438
beginning and ending balances and the total amount of the fees collected along with the interest earned.

For each public improvement, the amount of expenditures is to be shown as well as the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with the fees. If the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to fully finance an incomplete project, an approximate date for commencing should be identified.

Government Code § 66013 requires a financial accounting of the transactions dealing with water and sewer capacity and connection fees and charges (development impact fees) shall be made available to the public and require a description of the charges/fees deposited in the fund, the beginning and ending balance of the fund and any interest earned from investment of moneys in the fund and the amount of charges/fees collected in the fiscal year. This code also requires a local agency to list the public improvements on which charges/fees were expended, the percentage of the total cost of the public improvements that were funded by these charges/fees, the completed public improvements on which charges/fees were expended and each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the current fiscal year.

The Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2023, identifies the different funds that represent developmental fees.

The fees included in the report are:

Storm Drainage Fees (Fund 221)
Sewer Connection Fees (Fund 241)
Water Storage Fees (Fund 251)
Traffic Impact Fees (Fund 306)
Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fees – TVTC (Fund 321) Housing and Human Services Fee (Fund 333)
Park Fees-LARPD (Fund 337)
Major Attraction Fee (Fund 604)
Recycled Water Fee (Fund 250)
Road Improvement Fee (Fund 604)
Low Income Housing and Housing Impact Fees (Fund 611)

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
There is no direct fiscal impact in accepting the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2023. This report is required by the State of California and has been produced in house.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
17: Ensure effective use of public resources

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
439

2. Exhibit A - Annual Report
Prepared by: Erik Peterson
Finance Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
440
RESOLUTION NO. _______

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS REGARDING THE CONTINUING NEED FOR UNEXPENDED BALANCES OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AS OF JUNE 30, 2023, AND ACCEPTING THE ANNUAL REPORT OF DEVELOPMENT FEE AND CONNECTION FEE REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 The Mitigation Fee Act, commonly referred to as AB1600 and codified as California Government Code § 66000 et seq., regulates the imposition, collection, maintenance, expenditure, and reporting of impact fees imposed in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying costs of public facilities related to that project.

The City of Livermore (“City”) has identified the following nine (9) development impact fees collected from developers that are subject to AB1600’s requirements.

1. Fund 221 – Storm Drainage Fee

2. Fund 306 – Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)

3. Fund 321 – Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee – City Portion

4. Fund 333 – Housing and Human Services Facility Fee

5. Fund 337 – Park Fee

6. Fund 604 – Major Attraction Fee

7. Fund 250 – Recycled Water Fee

8. Fund 604 – Road Improvement Fee

9. Fund 611 – Low Income Housing and Housing Impact Fee As required by the Mitigation Fee Act, the City has created separate special revenue funds for each type of fee, crediting earned interest to those funds, and spending the accumulated fees and related interest on appropriate expenditures for those facilities.

An annual report for FY 2022-23 reflecting the beginning and ending balances of each separate fund containing development impact fees, the amount of fees collected, the interest earned for the year, the amount of expenditures and refunds made in the year, and a description of the type of fees, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

The Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to make specific findings every five (5) years with respect to any portion of the fees remaining unexpended or uncommitted after a period of five (5) years after deposit to identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put; to demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged; to identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of the incomplete improvement for which the fee is charged; and to designate the approximate dates on which the funding is expected to be deposited for the incomplete improvement.
441
RESOLUTION NO. _______
The City of Livermore (“City”) has identified the following two (2) connection fees:

1. Fund 241 – Sewer Connection Fee

2. Fund 251 – Water Connection Fee
The Mitigation Fee Act imposes similar requirements for sewer connection and water connection fees for public facilities in existence at the time the charge is imposed, or charges for new public facilities to be acquired or constructed in the future. For those connection fees, the Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to report the following within 180 days after the end of the fiscal year:

1. A description of the charges deposited in the fund;

2. The beginning and ending balance of the fund and the interest earned from investment of moneys in the fund;

3. The amount of charges collected in that fiscal year;

4. Each public improvement on which charges were expended and the amount of the expenditure for each improvement, including the percentage of the total cost of the public improvement that was funded with those charges if more than one source of funding was used;
a. Each public improvement on which charges were expended that was completed during that fiscal year;
b. Each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the following fiscal year; and

5. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the capital facilities fund that identifies the public improvements on which the transferred moneys are, or will be expended, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the rate of interest that the fund will receive on the loan.

The City desires to make the findings required by law with respect to these unexpended fees.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby makes the following findings for the corresponding fees and their funds:

1. $5,481,679 of the Storm Drain Impact Fund remains unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2022- 23, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the City Clerk and hereby incorporated by reference. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in Livermore Municipal Code Title 13, Chapter 13.44 and Resolution Nos. 2010-177 and 2016-149, along with the administrative record for the adoption of the ordinances codified in the Municipal Code and the resolutions. Sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements, as well as approximate dates on 442
RESOLUTION NO. _______
which funding is expected, are set forth in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

2. $15,433,336 of the Traffic Impact Fee Fund remains unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the FY 2022-23 Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenue and Expenditure, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the City Clerk and hereby incorporated by reference. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in Livermore Municipal Code Title 12, Chapter 12.30, along with the administrative record for the adoption of the ordinances codified in the Municipal Code. Sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements, as well as approximate dates on which funding is expected, are set forth in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

3. $1,481,716 of the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee – City Portion Fund remains unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the FY 2022-23 Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenue and Expenditure, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the City Clerk and hereby incorporated by reference. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in Livermore Municipal Code Title 12, Chapter 12.24 and Resolution No. 2014-184, along with the administrative record for the adoption of the ordinances codified in the Municipal Code and the resolution. Sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements, as well as approximate dates on which funding is expected, are set forth in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

4. $2,731,041 of the Recycled Water Fund remain unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the FY 2022-23 Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenue and Expenditure, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the City Clerk and hereby incorporated by reference. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in the South Livermore Valley Specific Plan first adopted in November 1997 and in Resolution No. 98- 175, along with the administrative record for the adoption of those resolutions. Sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements, as well as approximate dates on which funding is expected, is set forth in the FY 2023- 28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

5. $299,261 of the Road Improvement Fund remains unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the FY 2022-23 Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenue and Expenditure, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and in the FY 2023-28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the City Clerk and hereby incorporated by reference. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in the South 443
RESOLUTION NO. _______
Livermore Valley Specific Plan first adopted in November 1997 and in Resolution No. 98- 175, along with the administrative record for the adoption of those resolutions. Sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing on incomplete improvements, as well as approximate dates on which funding is expected, are set forth in the FY 2023- 28 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan.

6. $10,427,838 of the Low-Income Housing Impact Fee Fund remains unexpended after five years. The purpose for which the fee is to be put is articulated in the FY 2022-23 Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenue and Expenditure, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The reasonable relationship between the fee and purpose for which the fee is charged is set forth in Livermore Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.26 and Resolution No. 2000-87, along with the administrative record for the adoption of the ordinances codified in the Municipal Code and the resolution.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby approves the Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2022-23, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

On motion of Council Member _______________________, seconded by Council Member ________________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Marie Weber Katherine Mirassou
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Annual Report of Development Fee and Connection Fee Revenues and Expenditures Fiscal Year 2022-23
444

EXHIBIT A
445

EXHIBIT A
446

EXHIBIT A
447

EXHIBIT A
448

EXHIBIT A
449

EXHIBIT A
450

EXHIBIT A
451

EXHIBIT A
452

EXHIBIT A
453

EXHIBIT A
454

EXHIBIT A
455

EXHIBIT A
456

EXHIBIT A
457

EXHIBIT A
458

EXHIBIT A
459

EXHIBIT A
460
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.10
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tina Olson, Administrative Services Director
SUBJECT: Resolution accepting annual special tax and bond accountability reports for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park), 2009-1 (El Charro), 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance), 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance), 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance), 2016-2 (Shea Properties), 2018-1 (Auburn Grove), and 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution accepting annual special tax and bond accountability reports for Fiscal Year 2022-23 Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park), 2009-1 (El Charro), 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance), 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance), 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance), 2016-2 (Shea Properties), 2018-1 (Auburn Grove), and 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

SUMMARY
The Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (SB 165) stipulates that a report be filed annually with the governing body of any agency imposing special taxes or issuing bonds subject to voter approval after January 1, 2001. The annual report is required to contain the amount of funds collected and expended as well as the status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Section 53410. The annual report must be filed no later than December 31st. The City currently administers eight community facilities districts which are subject to these reporting requirements.

DISCUSSION
The Local Agency Special Tax Bond and Accountability Act, enacted by SB165 and codified in the California Government Code Sections 50075 through 50077 and 53410 through 53412. This Act requires:
that any local special tax measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific single purpose of the special tax;
that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to that purpose; 461
the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited and an annual report containing the following information:
i. The amount of special taxes that have been collected and expended; ii. The status of any project required or authorized to be funded by the special taxes.

The Act imposes similar accountability requirements with respect to any local bond measure that is subject to voter approval that would provide for the sale of bonds by a local agency. These requirements only apply to local agencies that have imposed special taxes or issued bond measures subject to voter approval after January 1, 2001. The annual report must be filed no later than December 31.

The City currently has the following eight community facilities districts which are subject to these reporting requirements:

1. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park) (“CFD 99- 1”),

2. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2009-1 (El Charro) (“CFD 2009-1”),

3. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance) (“CFD 2012- 1”),

4. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance) (“CFD 2015-1”),

5. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance) (“CFD 2016-1”),

6. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-2 (Shea Properties) (“CFD 2016-2”),

7. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 (Auburn Grove) (“CFD 2018-1”), and

8. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services) (“CFD 2021-1”).

The CFD 99-1 was established pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Mello-Roos Act”), on January 10, 2000, and thereafter amended on March 13, 2000. On May 11, 2015, the City issued the bonds in the principal amount of $15,655,000 for and on behalf of the CFD 99-1 for the defeasance and refunding in full of an outstanding series of bonds previously issued in 2000 in order to take advantage of the low interest rate environment, which resulted in significant savings to the property owners located within CFD 99-1.

On March 24, 2009, the City of Livermore formed the CFD 2009-1 in accordance with the Mello-Roos Act. The City has issued the following debt issues for and on behalf of the CFD 2009-1:

On June 1, 2015, the City entered into a special tax loan agreement with Livermore Premium Outlets, LLC with respect to its “Improvement Area No. 1”, under which Livermore Premium Outlets LLC (the Lender) loaned $19,632,406.03 to the District for the purpose of refinancing two previous loans made to the District on behalf of the CFD 2009-1 by the Lender and to finance the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities.

In 2016, the City issued bonds with respect to Improvement Area No. 2, to finance (i) a lease payment obligation of Improvement Area No. 2, and (ii) the acquisition and construction of the public infrastructure for the remaining phases of the El Charro Infrastructure. The Special Tax Bonds, designated as the “City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2009-1 (El Charro) 2016 Special Tax Bonds (Crosswinds Church) Improvement Area No. 2”, were issued on September 1, 2016, totaling $4,611,053 to pay for these obligations and improvements. 462
On July 14, 2017, the City issued a special tax note in the amount of $3,093,460.34 with respect to Improvement Area No. 3. This note evidences the obligations of the District under a Loan Agreement dated as of July 1, 2017 by and between the District and Livermore Investments, LLC, as lender, for the purpose of prepaying a lease payment obligation of Improvement Area No. 3 and financing acquisition and construction of public facilities.

On June 25, 2012, under the provision of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance). This district was created to finance certain municipal services by levying annual special taxes in the area of the CFD. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services are continued to be provided. The beginning Fund Balance for CFD 2012-1 was adjusted by $348,609.76 to remove the balance in the Equipment Purchase Reserve (EPR). The EPR is used to spread the funding of equipment purchases needed for the CFD.

On February 23, 2015, under the provision of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance). This district was created to finance certain municipal services by levying annual special taxes in the area of the CFD. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services are continued to be provided.

On March 14, 2016, under the provision of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance). This district was created to finance certain municipal services by levying annual special taxes in the area of the CFD. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services are continued to be provided.

In 2016, under the provisions of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2016-2 (Shea Properties) to refinance the $10,000,000 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006 issued for and on behalf of the Community Facilities District No. 2006-1. The City issued the CFD 2016-2 (Shea Properties) Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2016 totaling $10,015,000 on December 22, 2016.

On September 11, 2018, under the provision of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2018-1 (Auburn Grove). This district was created to finance certain municipal services by levying annual special taxes in the area of the CFD. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services are continued to be provided.

On July 12, 2021, under the provision of the Mello-Roos Act, the City formed the City of Livermore CFD 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services). This district was created to finance certain municipal services by levying annual special taxes in the area of the CFD. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services are continued to be provided.

The annual special tax and bond accountability reports for the above mentioned CFDs are included as exhibits to the resolution. These reports provide explicit public accountability for the amount of funds collected and expended, the specific purpose of those funds, as well as the status of projects authorized through the CFDs.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the special tax and bond accountability reports. 463

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
17: Ensure effective use of public resources

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - STBAR CFD 99-1 Tri-Valley

3. Exhibit B - STBAR 2009-1 El Charro

4. Exhibit C - STBAR CFD 2012-1 El Charro

5. Exhibit D - STBAR CFD 2015-1 Brisa

6. Exhibit E - STBAR CFD 2016-1 Sage

7. Exhibit F - STBAR CFD 2016-2 Shea Properties

8. Exhibit G - STBAR CFD 2018-1 Auburn Grove

9. Exhibit H - STBAR CFD 2021-1 Maintenance and Public Services Prepared by: David Doyle
Accounting Supervisor
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
464
RESOLUTION NO. _________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX AND BOND
ACCOUNTABILITY REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS NO. 99-1 (TRI-VALLEY TECHNOLOGY PARK), 2009-1 (EL CHARRO), 2012-1 (EL CHARRO MAINTENANCE), 2015-1 (BRISA MAINTENANCE), 2016-1 (SAGE MAINTENANCE), 2016-2 (SHEA PROPERTIES), 2018-1 (AUBURN GROVE), and 2021-1 (MAINTENANCE AND

PUBLIC SERVICES)
The Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act, enacted by Senate Bill 165 (Reg. Sess.1999-2000) and codified as part of California Government Code sections 50075 through 50077 and 53410 through 53412, requires local agencies that have imposed special taxes or issued bond measures subject to voter approval after January 1, 2001, to submit an annual report to its governing body.

City of Livermore staff has completed the Fiscal Year 2022-23 annual special tax and bond accountability reports for the following community facility districts to comply with the requirements of California Government Code sections 50075.3 and 53411:

1. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park);

2. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2009-1 (El Charro);

3. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance);

4. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance);

5. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance);

6. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-2 (Shea Properties);

7. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 (Auburn Grove); and

8. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby receives and accepts the annual special tax and bond accountability reports for the following community facility districts:

1. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park), attached hereto as Exhibit A;

2. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2009-1 (El Charro), attached hereto as Exhibit B;

3. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance), attached hereto as Exhibit C;

4. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance), attached hereto as Exhibit D;
465
RESOLUTION NO. _________

5. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance), attached hereto as Exhibit E;

6. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-2 (Shea Properties), attached hereto as Exhibit F;

7. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No 2018-1 (Auburn Grove), attached hereto as Exhibit G; and

8. City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services), attached hereto as Exhibit H.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Marie Weber Katherine Mirassou
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Report for CFD No. 99-1 (Tri-Valley Technology Park) Exhibit B – Report for CFD No. 2009-1 (El Charro)
Exhibit C – Report for CFD No. 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance) Exhibit D – Report for CFD No. 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance) Exhibit E – Report for CFD No. 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance) Exhibit F – Report for CFD No. 2016-2 (Shea Properties) Exhibit G – Report for CFD No. 2018-1 (Auburn Grove)
Exhibit H – Report for CFD No. 2021-1 (Maintenance and Public Services) 466
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 99-1 TRI-VALLEY

TECHNOLOGY PARK LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND

BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT
Senate Bill 165 enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act. This Act requires that any local special tax/local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to bonds issued on or after January 1, 2001 in accordance with Section 50075.1 or Section 53410 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation (bond issuance) of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This Report intends to comply with Sections 50075.3 and 53411 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The Annual report shall contain all of the following:
(a) The amount of funds collected and expended.
(b) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Sections 50075.1 and 53410.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds of:

City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 99-1
(Tri-Valley Technology Park)
Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2015
June 18, 2015
Purpose of Special Tax
For the payment of principal and interest on any outstanding Bonds becoming due and payable during the ensuing calendar year, any necessary replenishment or expenditure of the Reserve Fund, and an amount estimated to be sufficient to pay the Administrative Expenses (including amounts necessary to discharge any rebate obligation) during the ensuing year.

Reporting Requirements
Fund
06/30/2022
Balance
FY 2022/23
Amount
Collected
06/30/2023
Balance
Expended
Amount Project Status
Special Tax
Fund $2,443,922.96 $1,430,368.31 $2,310,104.54 $1,564,186.73 Complete

EXHIBIT A
467
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2009-1 EL CHARRO

LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY
REPORT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001, in accordance with Section 50075.1 or Section 53410 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the Special Tax District and others are handled through annual reports. This Section of this report intends to comply with Sections 50075.3 and 53411 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain both of the following:

1. The amount of funds collected and expended.

2. The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Sections 50075.1 and 53410.”
City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2009-1
El Charro
Purpose of Special Tax
On March 24, 2009, the City of Livermore formed Community Facilities District No. 2009-1 (El Charro) to finance the acquisition and construction of the facilities including but not limited to streets, transportation facilities, utilities, and public landscaping
Reporting Requirements
Fund
06/30/2022
Balance
FY 2022/23
Amount
Collected
06/30/2023
Balance
Expended
Amount Project Status
Special Tax $259,638.40 $2,055,468.77 $267,245.04 $2,047,862.13 Complete

EXHIBIT B
468
CITY OF LIVERMORE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 2012-1 (El Charro Maintenance) APPENDIX E E-1
City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2012-1
(El Charro Maintenance)
Purpose:

The City Council (“City”) of the City of Livermore (“City”) approved the Resolution of Formation to establish City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2012-1 (“CFD”) on June 25, 2012. The CFD was created to provide a funding mechanism to fund, in whole or in part, the annual cost to obtain, service, maintain, and replace public improvements associated with streetscape, storm and creek drainage, parks, trails, any costs to administer the CFD, along with any other authorized services approved at the time of formation. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services continue to be provided.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Revenues and Expenses:

Description
Fiscal Year
2022-23 Total
Revenues1
Special Taxes $421,268.18
Other $0.00
Total Revenues $421,268.18
Expenses
Water $22,558.74
PG&E $377.73
AT&T $27.11
Backflow $750.00
Contract Services $143,567.50
Land Lease $0.00
Maintenance Materials $97.59
Employee Cost $5,888.00
Equipment Purchase Reserve2 $36,319.09
Admin Fee $18,422.73
Indirect Expenditures $10,960.22
Total Expenses $238,968.71
Fund Balance Information3
Beginning Balance $1,919,730.93
Ending Balance $2,102,030.40
1 Special Taxes are equal to the amount collected in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and any additional revenues are identified as Other, unless otherwise identified.
2 Equipment Purchase Reserve funds are set aside to purchase equipment that will be used to perform CFD funded services. 3 Fund Balances are used for an operating reserve and allowed to accumulate for the replacement of authorized improvements.

EXHIBIT C
469
CITY OF LIVERMORE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 2015-1 (Brisa Maintenance) APPENDIX E E-1
City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2015-1
(Brisa Maintenance)
Purpose:

The City Council (“Council”) of the City of Livermore (“City”) approved the Resolution of Formation to establish City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2015-1 (“CFD”) on February 23, 2015. The CFD was created to provide a funding mechanism to fund, in whole or in part, the cost of maintenance, servicing, repair, replacement and removal of public parkways, landscape setbacks, public parks, open space, environmental preserves, publicly owned masonry walls, fences, park monuments and features, bioretention facilities, drainage facilities, trails, bike paths, and landscape medians in roadways both in and outside the CFD within the boundaries of the City, if the City has concluded that such maintenance would benefit the CFD. Additionally, the CFD will cover the costs associated with cleaning and removal of graffiti, associated electric, water, and other utility costs as well as setting, levy and collection of the annual special taxes and other contingency costs, any costs to administer the CFD, and any other authorized services approved at the time of formation. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services continue to be provided.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Revenues and Expenses:

Description
Fiscal Year
2022-23 Total
Revenues1
Special Taxes $154,595.64
Other $0.00
Total Revenues $154,595.64
Expenses
Water $24,357.32
PG&E $1,449.25
Contract Services $58,210.92
Landscape Materials $706.56
Irrigation Materials $0.00
Backflow $150.00
Repairs and Maintenance $469.03
Maintenance Materials $299.45
Employee Cost $5,472.00
Equipment Purchase Reserve2 $1,160.00
Other Replacement Reserve $0.00
Swale Replacement $0.00
Admin Fee $9,774.98
Indirect Expenditures $6,635.24
Total Expenses $108,684.75
Fund Balance Information3
Beginning Balance $844,931.20
Ending Balance $890,842.09 1
Special Taxes are equal to the amount collected in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and any additional revenues are identified as Other, unless otherwise identified.
2 Equipment Purchase Reserve funds are set aside to purchase equipment that will be used to perform CFD funded services. 3 Fund Balances are used for an operating reserve and allowed to accumulate for the replacement of authorized improvements.

EXHIBIT D
470
CITY OF LIVERMORE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 2016-1 (Sage Maintenance) APPENDIX E E-1
City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2016-1
(Sage Maintenance)
Purpose:

The City Council (“Council”) of the City of Livermore (“City”) approved the Resolution of Formation to establish City of Livermore Community Facilities District No. 2016-01 (“CFD”) on March 14, 2016. The CFD was created to provide a funding mechanism to fund, in whole or in part, the cost of maintenance, servicing, repair, replacement, and removal costs associated with park and specified services, such as storm water bioretention basins and drainage facilities, open space, environmental preserves, along with any other authorized services approved at the time of formation. Additionally, the CFD will cover the costs associated with setting, levy and collection of the annual special taxes and other contingency costs, any costs to administer the CFD, along with any other authorized services approved at the time of formation. The annual special taxes will be levied in perpetuity, as long as services continue to be provided.

Fiscal Year 2022-23 Revenues and Expenses:

Description
Fiscal Year
2022-23 Total
Revenues1
Special Taxes $127,592.90
Other $0.00
Total Revenues $127,592.90
Expenses
Water $0.00
PG&E $846.09
Contract Services $27,317.79
Landscape Materials $0.00
Irrigation Materials $0.00
Backflow $50.00
Repairs and Maintenance $0.00
Maintenance Materials $0.00
Employee Cost $4,981.76
Equipment Purchase Reserve2 $750.00
Other Replacement Reserve $0.00
Swale Replacement $0.00
Admin Fee $3,803.11
Indirect Expenditures $4,835.46
Total Expenses $42,584.21
Fund Balance Information3
Beginning Balance $695,888.65
Ending Balance $780,897.34 1
Special Taxes are equal to the amount collected in Fiscal Year 2022-23 and any additional revenues are identified as Other, unless otherwise identified.
2 Equipment Purchase Reserve funds are set aside to purchase equipment that will be used to perform CFD funded services. 2 Fund Balances are used for an operating reserve and allowed to accumulate for the replacement of authorized improvements.

EXHIBIT E
471
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2016-2

SHEA PROPERTIES LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND

BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). This Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001, in accordance with Section 50075.1 or Section 53410 of the California Government Code.

1. The amount of funds collected and expended.

2. The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Sections 50075.1 and 53410.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds of:

City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2016-2
(Shea Properties)
Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2016
December 22, 2016
Purpose of Special Tax
For the payment of principal and interest on any outstanding Bonds becoming due and payable during the ensuing calendar year, any necessary replenishment or expenditure of the Reserve Fund, and an amount estimated to be sufficient to pay the Administrative Expenses (including amounts necessary to discharge any rebate obligation) during the ensuing year.

Reporting Requirements
Fund
06/30/2022
Balance
FY 2022/23
Amount
Collected
06/30/2023
Balance
Expended
Amount Project Status
Special Tax
Fund $581,815.27 $800,387.36 $650,714.09 $731,488.54 Complete

EXHIBIT F
472
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2018-1 AUBURN

GROVE LOCAL AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND

ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). The Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001 in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

Some of the requirements of the Act are handled at the formation of the special tax district and others are handled through annual reports. This section of this report intends to comply with Section 50075.3 of the California Government Code that states:
“The chief fiscal officer of the issuing local agency shall file a report with its governing body no later than January 1, 2002, and at least once a year thereafter. The annual report shall contain all of the following:
(a) The amount of funds collected and expended.
(b) The status of any project required or authorized to be funded as identified in subdivision (a) of Section 50075.1.”
The requirements of the Act apply to the Funds of:

City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2018-1
District Formed September 11, 2018
Purpose of Special Tax
Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 (Auburn Grove) (the “District”) was formed to fund the maintenance, servicing, repair, replacement, and removal of trees, shrubs, plantings and irrigation systems together with AC pathway/trail with decomposed granite shoulders together with, root deflection and masonry walls. Maintenance also includes cleaning and removal of graffiti and associated electrical, water, and other utility costs.

Collections & Expenditures
Fund
06/30/2022
Balance
FY 2022/23
Amount
Collected
06/30/2023
Balance
Expended
Amount Service Status
Special Tax
Fund $72,970.03 $20,607.79 $86,779.37 $6,798.45 Ongoing

EXHIBIT G
473
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-1 LOCAL

AGENCY SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY
REPORT
Senate Bill 165, filed with the Secretary of State on September 19, 2000, enacted the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act (the “Act”). The Act requires that any local special tax or local bond measure subject to voter approval contain a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, require that the proceeds of the special tax be applied to those purposes, require the creation of an account into which the proceeds shall be deposited, and require an annual report containing specified information concerning the use of the proceeds. The Act only applies to any local special tax measure or local bond measure adopted on or after January 1, 2001 in accordance with Section 50075.1 of the California Government Code.

City of Livermore
Community Facilities District No. 2021-1
District Formed July 12, 2021
Purpose of Special Tax
Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (the “District”) was formed to fund the maintenance of a multiuse trail, bioretention planter, roadside swales and landscaping along the south side of West Jack London Boulevard. In addition, the maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways, streets, roads and open space, and flood and storm protection services.

Collections & Expenditures
Fund
06/30/2022
Balance
FY 2022/23
Amount
Collected
06/30/2023
Balance
Expended
Amount Service Status
Special Tax
Fund $14,211.02 $30,260.84 $40,091.34 $4,380.52 Ongoing

EXHIBIT H
474
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.11
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Christine Martin, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution of continued local emergency in response to impacts from a series of severe storm events earlier this year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution of continued local emergency in response to impacts from a series of severe storm events earlier this year.

SUMMARY
On January 10, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution ratifying the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services Concerning the Existence of a Local Emergency (Resolution No. 2023-001) in response to impacts from a series of severe storm events.

On February 27, April 24, June 12, July 24, September 11, and October 23, 2023, the City Council adopted resolutions of continued local emergency. California Government Code section 8630 directs the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days.

DISCUSSION
On January 4, 2023, the Executive Department of the State of California issued Executive Order N-2-23 proclaiming a State of Emergency for the Atmospheric River that started on December 27, 2022. On January 10, 2023, the City Council ratified a proclamation by the Emergency Services Director of the existence of a local emergency due to conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property that arose within the City of Livermore caused by a series of severe rainstorms and high wind commencing in December 2022 and continuing through January 2023.

Proclamation 23-01 was ratified, as required, by the City Council within seven days (Resolution No. 2023-001). Once ratified, California Government Code section 8630 directs the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days. On February 27, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution of continued local emergency (Resolution No. 2023-06). 475
On March 1, 2023, the Executive Department of the State of California issued a proclamation of State of Emergency due to a severe winter storm event beginning in February 2023 bringing damaging winds and historic precipitation that caused federal and state highways and road closures, and continued to threaten critical infrastructures, power outages, etc.

On March 24, 2023, the Alameda County Director of Emergency Services proclaimed a state of emergency due to conditions of continuing peril that have been presented by winter storms that resumed on February 23, 2023, continuing through March 2023, causing extensive damage and local expenses throughout the County.

On February 27, April 24, June 12, July 24, and September 11, and October 23, 2023, the City Council adopted resolutions of continued local emergency (Resolution Nos. 2023-026, and 2023-072, and 2023- 111, and 2023-150, and 2023-159, and 2023-187 respectively).

Staff recommends that the City Council continue the emergency proclamation to reflect the fact that emergency repairs have not been fully implemented and on-going work is required to recover from the damage. Continuing the emergency proclamation allows staff to seek reimbursement of the eligible costs of this work from federal and state agencies through the public assistance program.

Work includes removing sediment and debris from creeks and trails, repairing creek banks that have been washed away, repairing damaged trails, and pedestrian bridge abutments. While the repair projects are still under evaluation, staff estimates about 30 damaged sites totaling approximately $9,000,000.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The continuance of a Local Emergency allows the City to access federal, state and county resources, including potential financial reimbursements.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
1: Oversee the City's emergency preparedness, management, and response efforts

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
Prepared by: Herbert Cole
Management Analyst
476
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
477
RESOLUTION NO. _______

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION OF CONTINUED LOCAL EMERGENCY
(Severe Storm Events – December 2022 through March 2023) On January 10, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution, Ratifying the Proclamation of the Director of Emergency Services Concerning the Existence of a Local Emergency (Resolution No. 2023-001). The emergency services proclamation concerns conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property which have arisen within the City of Livermore caused by a series of severe rainstorms and high winds commencing in December 2022, and continuing through January 2023. On February 27, 2023, the City Council adopted a resolution of continued local emergency (Resolution No. 2023-026).

On March 1, 2023, California Governor, Gavin Newsom, proclaimed a state of emergency due to the severe winter storms that struck in late February as the result of an atmospheric river system forecast to continue through mid-March. The Governor issued his proclamation in response to a series of atmospheric river systems that impacted the State since late December 2022, causing forced closures, damage to highways and roads, and other impacts that local agencies did not have time to mitigate.

Furthermore, the continuing storms were expected to exacerbate those conditions. The Governor adopted a subsequent proclamation on March 28, 2023, to apply his March 1st proclamation to Alameda County. The Governor's proclamation directed the California Office of Emergency Services to provide assistance to local governments for the protection of public health and the environment, allowed for the mobilization of the California National Guard, allowed for state-owned properties to be made available for staging debris, and modified the hours-of-service limits in the California Vehicle Code and California Code of Regulations for fuel transportation and relief efforts.

Given the declaration of emergency by both the State of California and Alameda County, the existing damage and impacts from the prior storms, the anticipation of additional storms and wind, the need for continued debris removal, emergency response protective measures and permanent repairs all continue to present conditions that are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the City of Livermore.

Although efforts have been made to remedy the emergency conditions, City of Livermore staff report that the emergency conditions identified by the proclamation still exist. City of Livermore staff recommends continuing the declaration of emergency since 478
RESOLUTION NO. _______
it is required to be active in order to remain eligible to apply for and receive funding for costs to respond to and repair damages caused by the storm events.

Once a proclamation of local emergency is adopted, California Government Code section 8630 directs the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it has reviewed the January 4, 2023 proclamation of local emergency that the City Council ratified on January 10, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-001) and continued on February 27, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-026) and on April 24, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-072), and on June 12, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-111), and on July 24, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-150), and on September 11, 2023 (Resolution No. 2023-159), and on October 23, 2023 (Resolution 2023-187), as well as the subsequent proclamations of emergency in March by both the State of California and the County of Alameda due to the continuing systems of storms affecting the State and local areas, and hereby finds that conditions warrant continued maintenance of that proclamation of local emergency.

On motion of Council Member ____________________, seconded by Council Member _____________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ /s/ Jason R. Alcala
Marie Weber Jason R. Alcala
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk City Attorney
479
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7.1
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judy Erlandson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution amending the Livermore Airport Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities to require the provision of Unleaded Aviation Fuel by the Fixed Base Operator (FBO).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution amending the Airport Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities, to require the provision of unleaded aviation fuel by the Fixed Base Operator (FBO) within twenty-four months. In the event the Fixed Base Operator cannot comply within twenty-four months, the City may grant extensions as appropriate.

SUMMARY
On October 23, 2023, the City Council directed staff to update the Airport's Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities in response to community requests. This update will require all Fixed Base Operators (FBO) operating under the appropriate sections of the Commercial Minimum Standards to provide unleaded aviation fuel on the airfield at the Livermore Airport.

DISCUSSION
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued their final ruling regarding leaded fuel in aviation gasoline, effectively declaring that there is no safe level of lead in humans and as such finds the lead additives in aviation fuel to be an endangerment to the general public. Given this finding, the City plans to proactively move towards the transition to unleaded fuel at the Airport. Updating the minimum standards is the first step in this transition.

On October 23, 2023, the City Council directed staff to update the Airport's Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities in response to community requests pertaining to the provision of unleaded fuel at the airport. The Minimum Standards were last adopted by the City Council on March 25, 2019.

The proposed update will require all Fixed Base Operators (FBO) operating at the Airport under the 480
relevant sections of the Commercial Minimum Standards to provide unleaded aviation fuel on the airfield at the Livermore Airport. The proposed changes to the minimum standards are located in the Definitions, Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3-A of Exhibit A to the resolution, in red.

The resolution identifies a timeline for affected Fixed Base Operators to become compliant with the proposed amendments to the Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities, specifically:

Become compliant in twenty-four (24) months through a combination of the following, which may be adjusted:

Six (6) months to have an approvable plan in place;
Twelve (12) months for environmental documentation, entitlement, design and permitting; and Six (6) months thereafter for the addition/provision of unleaded fuel at the Airport including construction if required.

The availability and ability to provide unleaded aviation fuel that could safely and reliably replace the use of leaded fuel at the Airport may necessitate the extension of the timeline identified in the resolution.

Therefore, the resolution gives the Airport and City Manager the ability to make adjustments to the timeline as necessary.

Additionally, staff are working on recertification of an available fuel tank with the California Air Resources Board to facilitate bringing unleaded aviation fuel to the airfield the near term. If successful, this will allow the current FBO responsible for providing fuel at the Airport to become compliant with the minimum standard change much quicker.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
By taking this action there are no anticipated fiscal impacts to the City at this time.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
15: Uphold the integrity of Livermore’s Municipal Code, Development Code, and regulations.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - LVK Minimum Standards Update Unleaded Fuel Prepared by: Benedict Stuth
Acting Airport Manager
481
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
482
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MINIMUM

STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES FOR THE

LIVERMORE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT, TO REQUIRE THE PROVISION OF

UNLEADED AVIATION FUEL BY THE FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) The Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities ('Minimum Standards") are Federal Aviation Administration recommended guidelines and policies that, once adopted, ensure that individuals or entities engaged in commercial aeronautical activities at the Livermore Municipal Airport are reasonably fit, willing, and able to discharge both its service obligations to its patrons and its economic obligations to the airport tenants.

The Minimum Standards protect established commercial enterprises aviation users as well as the public, promote economic stability by discouraging unqualified applicants, foster the level of service desired by the public, and minimize the potential for violations of Federal grant assurance obligations.

The Minimum Standards were last adopted by the City Council on March 25, 2019.

This proposed update fulfills the standards role in fostering a level of service desired by the public in that it adds the requirement to include Unleaded Aviation fuel on the airfield by Fixed Base Operators who are required to provide Aviation Fuel.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby:

1. Adopts the proposed amendments to the Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities for the Livermore Municipal Airport, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference, giving those current Fixed Base Operators at the airport six (6) months to have an approvable plan in place, an additional twelve (12) months for environmental documentation, entitlement, and permitting, and an additional six (6) months thereafter for construction for the addition/provision of unleaded fuel at the airport.

2. In the event the Fixed Base Operator cannot comply with this change to the minimum standards within the twenty-four months prescribed through no fault of their own and based on timing, response periods, and workflows by governmental agencies required for approval, or availability of materials or fuels outside of the Fixed Base Operators control and documented for authenticity, the Fixed Base Operator 483
RESOLUTION NO. ________
may receive extensions as deemed appropriate by the City of Livermore.

3. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on December 11, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Marie Weber Tara Mazzanti
Deputy City Manager/City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A - Proposed Amendment to Minimum Standards
484
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Adopted December 11, 2023

CONTENTS
Part 1 Introduction, Purpose & Definitions
Part 2 General Requirements and Standards
Part 3-A Fixed Base Operator (FBO) / Full service
Part 3-B Airframe and Power Plant Repair
Part 3-C Avionics and Instrument Repair
Part 3-D Air Charter
Part 3-E Air Cargo
Part 3-F Flight Training / Aircraft Rental
Part 3-G Aircraft Sales
Part 3-H Specialized Aviation Service Operator (SASO)
Part 4-A Insurance for Fixed Base Operators
Part 4-B Insurance for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 5 Application for Commercial Aeronautical Activities

EXHIBIT A
485
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Livermore Municipal Airport
Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS

INTRODUCTION
Prudent and proper airport administration requires that standards be adopted to establish the minimum acceptable qualifications of participants, level and quality of service, and other conditions which will be required of those proposing to conduct commercial aeronautical activities at the Livermore Municipal Airport. The requirement to impose standards on those proposing to conduct commercial aeronautical activities on a public airport relates to the public interest and provides protection from irresponsible, unsafe or inadequate service.

The adoption and enforcement of such standards ensures that those individuals or entities engaged in commercial aeronautical activities (“the Operator”) is reasonably fit, willing and able to discharge both its service obligations to its patrons and its economic obligations to the airport community and protects established commercial enterprises, the aviation users, and the public.

The standards established for any particular commercial aeronautical activity must be relevant to that activity, must be reasonable in scope and must be applied objectively and uniformly.

Standards, so established and applied, promote economic stability by discouraging unqualified applicants and foster the level of services desired by the public.

PURPOSE
These regulations prescribe minimum standards for the conduct of commercial aeronautical activities at Livermore Municipal Airport and specify certain clauses which will be included in lease agreements permitting the conduct of such activities. Any required determinations, interpretations or judgments regarding what constitutes an acceptable minimum standard, or regarding compliance with such standard, shall be made by the City. All entities are encouraged to exceed the applicable minimum standards.

Aeronautical Activities may be proposed that do not fall within the categories designated herein. In any such cases, appropriate minimum standards shall be developed on a case-bycase basis for such Activities and incorporated into the Operator’s Agreement. No entity shall be allowed to engage in Aeronautical activities at the airport under conditions that do not, in the City’s sole but reasonable discretion, meet these Minimum Standards.

APPLICABILITY
Operators currently providing Activities without an Agreement or a Commercial Aviation Permit with the City will have six (6) months from the date of adoption of these Minimum Standards to become compliant with these Minimum Standards. These Minimum Standards shall apply to any new Agreement or any amendment to any existing Agreement relating to the occupancy or use of Airport land or Improvements for General Aviation Aeronautical Activities.

EXHIBIT A
486
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS Page 2
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235

DEFINITIONS
As used in these regulations, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

Air Cargo Operator, means an entity that provides the carriage of property under the appropriate FAR and operates aircraft that are within the weight limitations established for the Airport.

Air Charter Operator, means an entity that provides on-demand, non-scheduled passenger services and operates under the appropriate FAR (14 CFR Part 135 for common carriage or 14 CFR Part 125 for private carriage) with aircraft that provide no more than 30 passenger seats and are within the weight limitations established for the Airport.

Aircraft, means any contrivance, now known or hereafter invented, used, or designed for navigation of or flight in the air.

Aircraft Maintenance, means the repair, adjustment or inspection of aircraft. Major repairs include major alterations to the airframe, power plant, propeller and accessories as defined in FAR Part 43. Minor repairs include normal, routine annual inspection with attendant maintenance, repair, calibration or adjustment or repair of aircraft and their accessories.

Aircraft Sales Facility, means an entity engaged in the sale of new or used aircraft through franchises or licensed dealership or distributorship (either on a retail or wholesale basis) of an aircraft manufacturer or otherwise; and provides such repair, services and parts as necessary to meet any guarantee or warranty on new or used aircraft sold by it.

Airframe and Power Plant Repair Facility, means an entity operating under FAR Parts 63 and 91, or Part 145, and/or certified as an FAA Repair Station, as applicable, and providing one or a combination of airframe and power plant repair services. This category of services includes the sale of aircraft parts and accessories.

Airport, means the Livermore Municipal Airport, located in the City of Livermore, state of California.

Airport Purpose, means any authority action, undertaking or development that is consistent in maintaining the non-certificated status of the Airport and preserving the Airport funding category as a “Reliever Airport” serving general aviation users. The Airport Purpose does not include scheduled passenger services.

Airport Operations Area (AOA), means any area of the Airport used or intended to be used for landing, taking-off, or surface maneuvering of aircraft.

Apron, means those paved areas of the Airport within the AOA designated by the Airport for the loading and unloading of passengers, servicing, or parking of aircraft.

EXHIBIT A
487
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS Page 3
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
DEFINITIONS (cont.)
Avionics and Instrument Repair Facility, means an entity engaged in the business of, and providing a facility for the repair of aircraft radios and electrical systems, instruments and other accessories for aircraft. This category of services includes the sale of aircraft parts and accessories of the type repaired.

Aviation Fuels, means fuels used for the operation of aircraft. These fuels are:
• JetA, a kerosene-type fuel used in gas-turbine engines; • Avgas (100LL), leaded aviation gasoline used in piston-engine gasoline powered aircraft; • Unleaded Avgas; an unleaded aviation gasoline used in piston-engine gasoline powered aircraft;
• Mogas, automotive gasoline used in place of aviation gasoline suitable for use in some piston-engine gasoline powered aircraft.

CFR, means Code of Federal Regulations, of which Title 14 applies to Aeronautics and Space. The Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) are a component thereof.

Commercial Aeronautical Activity, means any activity which involves, makes possible, or relates to the operation of aircraft, the purpose of such activity being to secure earnings, income, compensation or profit, whether or not such objective(s) is accomplished. However, Commercial Aeronautical Activity at the Airport shall not include any activity which is contrary to the Airport Purpose. Commercial Aeronautical Activities are specifically defined in Parts 3- A through 3-H.

Commercial Aviation Permit (CAP), means the legal agreement between the Airport and an individual or entity providing a commercial aeronautical activity that grants permission to perform such activity on or from the Airport property, whether directly or indirectly related to aviation activities or aeronautical activities, and with the intent to generate and/or secure earnings, income, compensation (including exchange or barter of goods and services), and/or profit, whether or not such objectives are accomplished.

Courtesy Vehicle, means any vehicle used in Commercial Aeronautical Activity, other than a taxicab or vehicles regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, to transport persons, baggage, or goods, or any combination thereof, between the Airport and off-Airport businesses such as hotels, motels, or other attractions and the business establishment owning or operating such vehicle, the operation of which is generally performed as a service without direct costs to the passenger.

DOT, means United States Department of Transportation.

Entity, means a person, firm, corporation, or partnership.

Equipment, means all machinery, together with the necessary supplies, tools and apparatus necessary to the proper conduct of the activity being performed.

EXHIBIT A
488
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS Page 4
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Exclusive Right, as defined by the FAA in its grant assurances, means the power, privilege or other right excluding or preventing another from enjoying or exercising a like power, privilege or right. An exclusive right may be conferred either by express agreement, by imposition or unreasonable standards or requirements, or by any other means. Such a right conferred on one or more parties by excluding others from enjoying or exercising a similar right or rights would be an exclusive right.

FAA, means Federal Aviation Administration.

FAR, means Federal Aviation Regulation.

Fixed Base Operator (FBO), means an entity which maintains facilities at the Airport for the purpose of engaging in the retail sale of aviation fuels (if permitted) as well as aircraft sales/rental, flight instruction and training, air charter, air cargo, aircraft airframe and engine repair, avionics and aircraft line services.

For the purpose of these Minimum Standards, a FBO listed in Part 3-A is referred to as a “Full Service FBO” and shall engage in the retail sale of aviation fuels and provide full fuel and line services to all based and transient General Aviation aircraft. Minimum Standards for a FBO not providing Full services, but engaged in one or in a combination of the aforementioned aeronautical activities, are listed in Parts 3-B through 3-H, as applicable.

Flight Training/Aircraft Rental Facility, means an entity engaged in instructing pilots in dual and solo flight training, in fixed or rotary wing aircraft, and provides such related ground school instruction as is necessary preparatory to taking a written examination and flight check for the category or categories of pilot’s licenses and ratings involved. This category of services includes provisions for the rental of aircraft to the public.

General Aviation, means that portion of civil aviation that encompasses all facets of aviation except scheduled air carriers.

Hazardous Material, means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste which is, or becomes regulated, by any local government authority, the State of California or the United States Government. The term Hazardous Material includes without limitation, any substance that is (a) defined as a hazardous substance under appropriate state law provisions, specifically the California Fire Code and Section 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code; (b) petroleum; (c) asbestos; (d) designated as hazardous substance pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 USC Section 1321); (e) defined as hazardous waste pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (42 USC Section 9601); or (f) defined as a regulated substance pursuant to Subchapter IX, Solid Waste Disposal Act (Regulation of Underground Storage Tanks) (42 USC Section 6991).

Improvements, means all buildings, structures and facilities including pavement, fencing, signs and landscaping constructed, installed or placed on, under or above any leased area by or with the concurrence of a lessee. Plans and specifications for all improvements must be approved by the City for conformity with its building and constructions standards. All permits required for the

EXHIBIT A
489
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS Page 5
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
improvements must be obtained prior to construction.

Lease, means a contractual agreement between the City and an entity setting forth the terms and conditions upon which the tenant may occupy and use the property.

Master Plan, means an assembly of appropriate documents and drawings covering the development of the airport from a physical, economical, social, and political jurisdictional perspective and adopted by the City, a copy of which is on file and available for inspection in the airport manager’s office.

Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities, otherwise referred to as “Minimum Standards,” means those qualifications, standards, and criteria set forth as the minimum requirements established as a condition for the right to engage in commercial aeronautical activities at the Airport, and as they may be amended from time to time.

Operator, means a person, firm, corporation, partnership that leases a facility or facilities at the Airport for the purpose of engaging in commercial aeronautical activities or related services. Included are sublessees and those who otherwise operate from a facility or facilities such as Commercial Aviation Permit holders.

Principals, means for Corporations all directors, officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of the company stock; means for Partnerships all general and limited partners.

Property, means anything that is owned by an entity. Property is divided into two types: “real property,” which is any interest in land, real estate, or the permanent improvements on it, and “personal property”, which is everything else.

Ramp, means a paved area suitable for aircraft parking, and/or movement and staging of aircraft.

Regulatory Measures, means Federal, state, county, and City laws, codes, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations, all as may be in existence, hereafter enacted, and amended from time to time.

Repair Facility, means a facility utilized for the repair of aircraft to include airframe, power plant, propellers, radios, instruments and accessories. Such facility will be operated in accordance with pertinent FAA regulations.

Rules and Regulations, means those rules and regulations governing the operations of the airport, properly adopted by ordinance of the City Council, and as may be amended from time to time.

Run-up, means aircraft engine operation above normal idle power for purposes other than initiating taxi or takeoff.

EXHIBIT A
490
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Part 1 INTRODUCTION, PURPOSE & DEFINITIONS Page 6
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
DEFINITONS (cont.)
Self-Fueling, means the fueling of an aircraft by the owner of the aircraft or the owner’s employees using the owner’s equipment.

Self-Service Fueling, means dispensing fuel into an aircraft using a commercial self-service aircraft fueling station.

Specialized Aviation Service Operator (or “SASO”), means a commercial Operator engaged in providing a single aeronautical service, or a combination of aeronautical services, including, but not limited to Aircraft Maintenance, avionics or instrument maintenance, Aircraft rental and/or flight training, Aircraft charter or Aircraft management, Aircraft sales, and/or Aircraft storage. A SASO is not permitted to engage in aeronautical activities involving aviation fuel.

Sublease, means a lease granted by a lessee to another entity of all or part of the property.

Tie-down, means the area, paved, or unpaved, suitable for parking and mooring of aircraft wherein suitable tie-down points have been located.

Weight Limitations, means the maximum allowable weight limits established for the Airport relating to the maximum gross takeoff weight of any aircraft. The weight limitations at Livermore Municipal Airport are 45,000 pounds for single-wheel loads, and 90,000 pounds for dual-wheel loads.

EXHIBIT A
491
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Livermore Municipal Airport
Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS

WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LIVERMORE
Prior to commencement of a commercial aeronautical activity, the Operator will be required to enter into a lease with the City and/or obtain a Commercial Aviation Permit. Such agreements will recite the terms and conditions under which the business will be operated on the Airport, including but not limited to, the term of the agreement, the rentals, fees and charges, the rights and obligations of the respective parties understood, therefore, that neither conditions therein contained nor those set forth in these Minimum Standards represent a complete recitation of the provisions to be included in the written agreement. Such provisions, however, will neither change nor modify the Minimum Standards nor be inconsistent therewith.

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall lease, sublease, and/or construct sufficient ground space, facilities and accommodations for the proposed commercial aeronautical activity. The Operator must provide copies of subleases to the City. In addition to the general requirements listed below, refer to the respective commercial aeronautical activity sections (3-A through 3-H) for more specific ground space and facilities’ requirements:
a.) The Operator shall provide a full description and detailed development plans (drawing) of the location of the ground space, facilities, and accommodations to be utilized solely for the Operator’s proposed commercial aeronautical activity. The Operator must identify the location of its aircraft parking and staging areas, customer lounges, vehicle parking areas, and restrooms. Operator shall lease or Sublease sufficient land and/or lease, Sublease, or construct sufficient Improvements for the Activity as stipulated in these Minimum Standards. b.) The ground space shall include paved access to the Operator’s office and paved aircraft apron with tie-down or hangar facilities within the leased area sufficient to accommodate the movement, staging, and parking of Operator’s, Operator’s Sublessees’, and customers’ aircraft without interfering with the movement of aircraft in and out of other facilities and aircraft operating in Taxilanes or Taxiways and any other activities being performed. Aprons associated with hangars shall be able to accommodate the movement of the largest aircraft the hangar is able to accommodate into and out of the hangar, staging, and parking of customer and/or Operator aircraft without interfering with the movement of aircraft in and out of other facilities and aircraft operating in Taxilanes or Taxiways. Paved vehicle parking shall be sufficient to accommodate all Operator’s and Operator’s Sublessees’ (if Subleasing facilities) customers, employees, visitors, vendors, and suppliers vehicles on a daily basis.
c.) The facilities and floor space allotments shall include office and customer lounge facilities. These facilities must be properly heated, ventilated, cooled and lighted.

EXHIBIT A
492
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Page 2
GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS (cont.)
d.) The public accommodations shall include telephones for customer use, restrooms, sufficient on-site customer and staff auto parking spaces, and handicap access in accordance with all federal, state and local regulations.
e.) The Operator shall maintain all pavement constructed by the Operator in good condition. The maintenance of the building(s), utility costs, and trash removal shall be the Operator’s responsibility. Landscaping and the maintenance of security fences and access gates within the Operator’s leased premises shall be the Operator’s responsibility. f.) For construction of any new facilities, the Operator will be subject to the same standards of development as are contained in the Livermore Municipal Airport Master Plan and the City of Livermore Building Code, Fire Code, and the Planning & Zoning Code. All construction plans must be submitted to the City for approval prior to modification or construction of any building, hangar, or other facility on the leased premises. g.) The business and construction activities of the Operator shall be done in such manner as to avoid the dispersion of foreign object debris on the airfield. h.) Operator shall not discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age or physical handicap in providing any products or services or in the use of any of its facilities provided for the public, or in any manner prohibited by applicable Regulatory Measures including, without limitation, Part 21 of the Rules and Regulations of the office of the Secretary of Transportation effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended or reenacted.

LICENSES AND CERTIFICATIONS
The Operator shall comply with all federal, state, county and/or municipal laws and regulations concerning its proposed operation and, if requested, provide copies of all pertinent permits, licenses and certifications. Operator shall keep in effect and post in a prominent place all necessary or required licenses, permits, certifications, or ratings.

PERSONNEL
The Operator shall have in his employ and on duty during operating hours, trained personnel in such number as are required to meet the Minimum Standards and Specific Requirements set forth herein. The Operator shall also provide a responsible person on the leased premises to supervise the operations during all business hours.

All personnel are required to hold all applicable Federal Aviation Administration Certificates and ratings. The person managing the Operator’s activities shall have sufficient experience managing a comparable activity to that proposed on the qualified and authorized to represent and act for and on behalf of Operator during all hours of activities with respect to the method,

EXHIBIT A
493
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Page 3
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PERSONNEL (cont.)
manner, and conduct of the Operator and Operator’s activities. When such responsible person is not on the leased premises, such individual shall be immediately available by telephone or pager. The Operator shall have in its employ, on duty, and on premises during hours of activity, properly trained, qualified and courteous personnel in such numbers as are required to meet these Minimum Standards and to meet the reasonable demands of the aviation public for each activity being conducted in a safe, efficient, courteous, and prompt manner.

SECURITY
The Operator shall designate a responsible person for the coordination and communication of all security procedures and provide the Airport Manager with the names of both the primary and secondary contacts along with 24-hour telephone numbers for both persons. If requested by the Airport Manager, the Operator shall develop and maintain a Security Plan.

The Operator shall maintain fencing, doors, gates, lighting and locks in good condition. All Operators shall develop positive key control and apron access procedures and comply with the pertinent reporting requirements to the FAA, the Department of Homeland Security and law enforcement agencies.

AIRCRAFT LEASEBACK, SUBLEASE, OR OTHER AIRCRAFT OPERATING

AGREEMENTS
All aircraft leases, leasebacks, subleases or other aircraft operating agreements involving commercial activity between an aircraft owner/operator and other parties operating at the Airport shall conform to the standards stipulated under Parts 3-A through 3-H for the respective aeronautical activities being performed under the subject agreement.

All aircraft leases, leasebacks, subleases or other aircraft operating agreements involving commercial aircraft activity at or from the Airport shall include the following: “this agreement shall not violate the Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities as set by the City of Livermore nor shall this instrument be used for the purpose of evading any of the Livermore Municipal Airport Rules & Regulations.”

INSURANCE
The Operator shall procure, maintain, and pay premiums during the term of the agreement for insurance of the types and the minimum limits set forth in the specific requirements for the respective commercial aeronautical activities under Parts 3-A through 3-H, and 4-A and 4-B.

Disclosure Requirement: All Operators conducting rental, sales, or flight training shall post a notice and incorporate within their rental agreements the coverages and limits provided to the student or renter by the Operator, as well as a statement advising that additional coverage is

EXHIBIT A
494
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Page 4
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
INSURANCE (cont.)
available to such student/renter through the purchase of an individual non-ownership liability policy. The Operator shall provide a copy of such notice to the Airport Manager.

FBO FUELING
Although fueling activities performed by a Fixed Base Operator / Full service (Part 3-A) are subject to the following standards, the standards are also typically contained as covenants in the FBO’s ground lease agreement and may include additional provisions.

At a minimum, the Fixed Based Operator (FBO) must provide the following Aviation fuels:
• Jet A
• Avgas (100LL)
• Unleaded Avgas
Optionally, an FBO Fuel provider may offer Mogas if requested or desired.

SELF-FUELING
Any Operator desiring to self-fuel, as a stand-alone Operator shall apply for a Self-Fueling Permit according to the requirements set forth in Livermore Municipal Code Airports Rules & Regulations 11.08.110 Aviation Fueling Operations.

FUEL FLOWAGE FEE
Any entity permitted to dispense fuel on the Airport, including self-fueling permit holders, shall pay a fuel flowage fee that has been established in the Airport Rates and Charges fee schedule, as revised from time to time and approved by City Council resolution, and submit monthly fueling activity reports to the Airport Manager. The FBO or permittee shall maintain liability insurance with coverage for products and completed operations with limits of not less than $25 million per occurrence. The FBO or permittee shall enter into an agreement with the fuel supplier to guarantee the direct payment of the fuel flowage fee to the City immediately following each delivery of any aviation fuel product by the supplier. The fuel supplier shall provide a copy of the delivery receipt or bill of lading, showing the gravity- corrected and recalibrated net quantity, of which the fee shall be paid within 15 days from the date of delivery.

MOTOR VEHICLES ON AIRPORT
The Operator will control the transportation of pilots, flight crews and passengers to and from the Operator’s facility or office to the Operator’s apron and/or tie-down areas. The Operator performing this service with motor vehicles driving on the AOA shall do so only in accordance with the Livermore Municipal Code provisions relating to the Airport Rules & Regulations, a copy of which is available at the Airport administrative office or online.

EXHIBIT A
495
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Page 5
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Any Operator using service vehicles on the AOA in the support and conduct of its business shall procure and maintain automobile liability insurance with coverage of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage, naming the City as additional insured.

COMMERCIAL AVIATION PERMIT & FEE
All Operators engaging in Commercial Aeronautical Activities at the Airport shall meet or exceed the requirements of this Section as well as the minimum standards applicable to the Operator’s Activities, as set forth in subsequent sections.

Any Operator not being in possession of a valid ground lease agreement or having entered into a month-to-month lease with the City shall obtain a Commercial Aviation Permit (“CAP”) and pay an annual fee. The fee is subject to adjustment as specified from time to time by resolution of the City Council. The fee also applies to Specialized Aviation Service. Operators who are sublessees or subtenants of Operators having leases with the City and shall be due on the first day of July of every year. The CAP authorizes the conduct of business on the Airport and assures that each business possesses a valid City Business License and maintains liability insurance in accordance with Part 4-B of these Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities and may be amended from time to time. Certificates of Insurance required by Regulatory Measures and set forth by these Minimum Standards for each Activity shall be delivered to the City upon execution of any Agreement or approval.

Operator shall furnish additional Certificates of Insurance 30 days prior to any changes in coverage, if the change results in a reduction.

OTHER RATES & CHARGES
The Operator shall pay any applicable rates and charges as set forth by resolution of the City Council. Pursuant to the Airport Rates and Charges (Resolution No. 2007-112), and any subsequent amendments thereto as authorized by the City Council, a landing fee for commercial aircraft operations is assessed. The fee only applies to non-based general aviation aircraft engaged in commercial activities, e.g., air taxi, charter or cargo operations conducted under FAR Part 121 and Part 135 or other applicable FAR’s based on maximum certificated gross landing weight. Only revenue-producing operations are subject to the landing fee. Landings of aircraft that are based at Livermore through a written tie-down or hangar lease agreement with the City or the Lessee are exempt from the fee. Further exempt from the fees are landings conducted by military and federal government aircraft as well as landings performed due to in-flight emergencies, maintenance and training.

EXCLUSIVE RIGHT
As defined by the FAA in its grant assurances, “Exclusive Right” means the power, privilege or other right excluding or preventing another from enjoying or exercising a like power, privilege or right. An exclusive right may be conferred either by express agreement, by imposition or unreasonable standards or requirements, or by any other means. Such a right conferred on one or more parties by excluding others from enjoying or exercising a similar right or rights would be an exclusive right. The granting of an exclusive right to conduct a Commercial Aeronautical Activity on an Airport developed by or improved with federal funds is expressly forbidden by law.

EXHIBIT A
496
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS Page 6
Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
If the FAA determines that any provision of these Minimum Standards, Agreement, or a practice constitutes a grant of prohibited Exclusive Right, such provision or practice shall be deemed null and void and/or such practice shall be discontinued immediately.

MULTIPLE SPECIALIZED ACTIVITIES
When more than one Activity is conducted at the Airport by a single Operator, the applicable minimum standards for the Operator shall be determined by the Airport Manager and shall be based upon the most stringent requirements for each of the Activities to be undertaken by the Operator.

EXHIBIT A
497
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE
A full service Fixed Base Operator (FBO) is an entity that is authorized and required by agreement with the Airport to maintain facilities at the Airport for the purpose of engaging in the retail sale of aviation fuels and lubricants, and provide aircraft airframe and engine maintenance and line services as well as tie-down, hangaring, parking, and ancillary aircraft ground services for gainful or revenue producing purpose, regardless of the form of compensation.

For the purpose of these Minimum Standards, an FBO listed in Part 3-A shall provide full fuel and line services to all based and transient general aviation aircraft, except those that hold a self-fueling permit. At a minimum any FBO that falls under Section 3-A must provide all available Aviation Fuels, with the exception of Mogas, as described in Part 2, General Requirements and Standards, and Part 3-A, Fixed Base Operator (FBO)/Full Service. Minimum Standards for an FBO not providing full services, but engaged in one or in a combination of the aforementioned aeronautical activities, are listed in Parts 3- B through 3-H.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The minimum ground space to be leased shall be 305,000 square feet, or 7.00 acres.

Improvements shall include paved apron and taxiway surfaces as well as hangar, fuel farm, terminal, vehicle parking, landscaping, and office and shop space.

The principal buildings and facilities used by the FBO shall allocate a minimum of 1,500 square feet for conveniently located heated and air conditioned lounge or waiting rooms and restrooms for passengers and crews, which shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Public facilities for flight planning and weather information shall be provided for pilots.

At least one public telephone shall be provided.

The fuel storage facility or fuel farm shall have a minimum capacity of 45,000 gallons aboveground storage combined for Avgas (100LL) and turbine fuel (Jet A).

Paved Tie-Down’s shall be provided to accommodate an adequate number and variety of based and transient aircraft, encompassing no less than 100,000 square feet of paved tiedown apron.

A minimum of 25,000 square feet of hangar floor space shall be provided within which aircraft airframe and engine repair activities, hangar keeping, and any permitted aeronautical activity may be performed.

Automobile parking minimums shall be provided in relation to the size of the structures and ramp area, and in accordance within City of Livermore Planning and Zoning Code.

The FBO shall provide ground space, facilities and accommodations sufficient for each of its permitted activities.

EXHIBIT A
498
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 2 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – Reference the appropriate sections under Part 3 for the aircraft requirements for flight training, aircraft rental, aircraft sales, air cargo and air charter.

Environmental – The FBO shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Hazardous Materials Permit and shall have a written Spill Prevention Contingency and Control Plan that meets Regulatory Measures for fuel storage facilities. FBO shall be liable and indemnify the City for all leaks, spills, or other damage that may result through the handling and dispensing of fuel. Ensuring the quality of the fuel is the responsibility of the FBO.

Equipment – In regards to airframe and power plant repair activities, the FBO shall provide all equipment, supplies and parts necessary to accommodate those aircraft for which repair services will be provided.

In regards to Line Service activities, the FBO shall provide adequate tie-down facilities and equipment, including ropes, chains, wheel chocks, and other types of restraining devices, adequate loading, unloading and towing equipment to safely and efficiently move aircraft as necessary. Further provided shall be two Avgas refuelers and two jet refuelers with a minimum capacity of 2,000 gallons per unit, one ground power unit, one air start, one lavatory cart, two tugs rated for 65,000 lb. aircraft, a tow bar with heads for most general aviation aircraft falling within the 65,000 lb. limit, and a potable water delivery system. Also, proper equipment shall be provided for repairing and inflating aircraft tires, servicing oleo struts, changing oil, washing aircraft and aircraft windows, recharging or energizing discharged aircraft batteries and starters. FBO shall have on hand, at all times, sufficient containment booms to form a barrier around any fuel spills, and have sufficient cleanup absorbents, pillows, pads, etc., to pick up the product and to store the same (saturated booms, blankets, etc.) in a sealed container(s) until proper disposal can be effected. The salvage drum(s) shall be approved by the DOT (DOT-E-10102). FBO shall have an adequate number of approved and regularly inspected dry chemical fire extinguisher units that shall be maintained within all hangars, on apron areas, at fuel storage facilities, and on all ground handling and refueling vehicles.

Licenses – The FBO or its designees shall have and provide evidence of the appropriate FAA and DOT certifications and approvals for the required or permitted aeronautical activities.

FBO and its personnel shall obtain and comply with, at FBO’s sole expense, all necessary licenses, permits, certifications, or ratings required for the conduct of FBO’s activities at the Airport as required by the City or any other duly authorized agency prior to engaging in any activity at the Airport. Upon request, FBO shall provide copies of such licenses, permits, certifications, or ratings to the Airport Manager within 10 business days. FBO shall keep in effect and post in a prominent place all necessary or required licenses, permits, certifications, or ratings.

EXHIBIT A
499
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 3 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
SCOPE OF SERVICE (cont.)
Motor Vehicles – The FBO shall provide aircraft-to-lounge ground transportation for transient passengers and pilots, and provide one Courtesy Vehicle to provide transportation of passengers, crews, and baggage to and from destinations on the Airport and local area hotels and restaurants.

Personnel – The FBO shall employ sufficient personnel who are appropriately rated by the FAA for the work being performed for each activity. Reference the appropriate sections under Part 3 for the personnel requirements for flight training, aircraft rental, aircraft sales, air cargo and air charter. The FBO shall have a line or customer service employee on duty at all times during operating hours.

Rates and Charges – The rates and charges for aircraft parking, tie-down and storage shall be determined by the FBO and are subject to the requirements that all rates and charges shall be reasonable and be equally and fairly applied to all users of its services. All rates and charges will be filed with the Airport Manager.

Subleases – The FBO may sublease a portion of the principal buildings and facilities for the purpose of assisting FBO in the full utilization of its fixed base operation. The FBO will develop a standard set of sublease terms and conditions which must be pre-approved by the City. The FBO is required to provide to the City, within ten (10) days of execution, a notarized copy of any sublease for building or hangar space to another entity which does not substantially conform to the pre-approved sublease terms and conditions to provide one or more commercial aeronautical activities.

The FBO shall include in any such sublease covenants and assurances from the sublessee regarding compliance with the applicable minimum standards and airport rules and regulations as codified in the Livermore Municipal Code. The commercial aeronautical activities and business purpose shall be clearly stated in the sublease and the sublessee shall be limited to those aeronautical activities. The FBO shall further specify that the operation is under the direct supervision and guidance of the FBO and subject to the terms and conditions of the ground lease in effect between the FBO and the City.

The FBO shall be required to carry commercial general liability insurance for all sublessees or provide a certificate of insurance naming the City of Livermore and sublessee as additional insured. Any entity subleasing FBO space is subject to payment of an annual Commercial Aviation Fee, as referenced in Parts 3-B through 3-H.

Taxes and Assessments – The FBO shall, at its sole cost and expense, pay all taxes, fees and other assessments that may be levied, assessed or charged by any duly authorized agency associated with FBO’s Leased Premises against any building or other structure, land and/or improvements or personal property on the premises and/or FBO’s activities.

EXHIBIT A
500
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 4 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235

REQUIRED ACTIVITIES
Airframe and Power Plant Repair – Airframe and power plant repair services, including parts and accessories shall be provided by FAA approved personnel. The FBO can meet this required activity through an authorized Sublessee who meets the minimum requirements contained in Part 3-B.

Hangar Keeping – Hangar facilities shall be provided for the storage and maintenance of aircraft.

Fueling – The FBO shall make satisfactory arrangements with a recognized aviation fuel distributor for the delivery of fuels and oil in such quantities to meet the requirements set forth herein. Fuel flowage fees shall be paid to the City for all fuel dispensed by FBO.

Fuel and into-plane delivery of aviation fuels shall be provided by the FBO seven days a week, and between the hours of 6:00 AM and 9:00 PM, whether services are continuously offered or available after regularly scheduled hours, on-call, with response time not to exceed 45 minutes. The FBO shall be able to extend/adjust these operating hours if customers so demand in an effort to comply with the 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM “Voluntary Restraint from Night Flying” policy period. The FBO shall provide mobile fuel dispensing equipment capable of safe and efficient servicing of all types of general aviation aircraft.

Fuel storage tanks and fixed self-service fueling facilities shall be installed according to all current regulations and shall be subject to approval by the Livermore/Pleasanton Fire Department. FBO shall develop and maintain Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for fueling and ground handling and shall ensure compliance with standards set forth in FAA Advisory Circular 00-34A “Aircraft Ground Handling and Servicing.” FBO’s SOP shall include a training plan, fuel quality assurance procedures and record keeping, and emergency response procedures to fuel fires and spills. FBO’s SOP shall also address: bonding and fire protection; public protection; control of access to fuel storage facilities; and marking and labeling of fuel storage tanks and Refueling Vehicles. FBO’s SOP shall be submitted to the Airport Manager no later than 30 days before the FBO commences Activities at the Airport.

Aviation fuel must be provided in the following types as is available in the marketplace by all FBOs listed under this section:
• Jet A
• Avgas 100LL
• Unleaded Avgas
• Optionally or as requested, Mogas
Aircraft Refueling Vehicles shall be equipped with metering devices that meet all applicable Regulatory Measures. Each Refueling Vehicle shall be equipped and maintained to comply with all applicable safety and fire prevention requirements, standards, and Regulatory Measure including without limitation, those prescribed by:
• State of California Fire Code and local Fire District

EXHIBIT A
501
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 5 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Codes
• California Department of Health and Environment Oil Inspection Regulatory Section • Applicable FAA Advisory Circulars (AC) including AC00-34 “Aircraft Ground Handling and Servicing” and AC 150/5210-5 “Painting, Marking and Lighting of Vehicles Used on an Airport”.
• FBO shall maintain current records on file of quality control checks and inspections of fuel storage facilities, fixed self-service fueling systems, and Refueling Vehicles and shall make such records available to the Airport Manager for review/audit at any time.

Line Service – Involves buying, storing, selling and furnishing of aviation fuels and oils to third parties. Line service, including oxygen and nitrogen, facilities to service, clean and deodorize aircraft toilets and clean both the interior and exterior of aircraft, Unicom, telephone and radio contact to and with service personnel.

Line service further includes providing potable water, power starts, ground power, aircraft marshalling, towing, staging and parking, and reservations/arrangements for catering, hotel, rental car, taxi, crew/courtesy car and limousine services. The FBO shall provide initial and recurrent line service training and certification to all line personnel in accordance with Part 2 of these Minimum Standards.

EXHIBIT A
502
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 6 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235

PERMITTED ACTIVITIES
The FBO must meet the more inclusive of the standards under this Part 3-A or the specific standards written for any and all of the Permitted Activities below:

Avionics and Instrument Refer to Part 3-C
Repair
Air Charter Refer to Part 3-D
Air Cargo Refer to Part 3-E
Flight Training / Aircraft Refer to Part 3-F
Rental
Aircraft Sales Refer to Part 3-G
Specialized Aviation Service Refer to Part 3-H
Operator (SASO)
Concessions – Lounge, food and beverage service, including vending machines, catering service and packaged liquor for restocking of aircraft galleys.

Ground Transportation – Car rental and other ground transportation services, automobile parking and automobile and other ground support, support equipment and rental automobiles.

Office Space – The FBO shall be permitted to sublease office space for aviation-related business activities not specifically listed herein.

EXHIBIT A
503
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-A FIXED BASE OPERATOR (FBO) / FULL SERVICE Page 6 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES (cont.)
FBO and its sublessees shall not discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or physical handicap in providing any products or services or in the use of any of its facilities provided for the public, or in any manner prohibited by applicable Regulatory Measures including without limitation Part 21 of the Rules and Regulations of the office of the Secretary of Transportation effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights At of 1964, as amended or reenacted.

FEES
Fuel flowage fees and other charges are applicable in the Airport Rates and Charges schedule, as revised from time to time and approved by City Council resolution.

INSURANCE
Refer to Part 4-A “Insurance for Fixed Base Operators.”

AIRPORT DISASTER RELIEF SUPPORT
The FBO shall make itself available as a resource in the event of a disaster and actively plan to provide fuel and equipment to support emergency medical evacuation flights and other relief flight activities.

EXHIBIT A
504
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-B AIRFRAME AND POWER PLANT REPAIR
An Airframe and Power Plant Repair Facility Operator is an entity operating under FAR Parts 43 and 91, or Part 145, and/or certified as an FAA Repair Station, as applicable, and providing one or a combination of airframe and power plant repair services. This category of services includes the sale of aircraft parts and accessories.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall provide, lease or sublease at least 2,500 square feet of hangar space for airframe and power plant repair services and, if contemplated, to include a segregated painting area meeting local and state code requirements.

The Operator shall provide, lease or sublease sufficient paved aircraft parking space within or nearby the leased area to accommodate customer aircraft awaiting repair without inhibiting on the airport’s aircraft movement areas.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Environmental – The Operator must comply with the requirements of the City’s Hazardous Materials Permit.

Equipment – The Operator shall provide all equipment, supplies and parts necessary to accommodate those aircraft for which repair services will be provided.

Licenses & Certifications – If the Operator applies to the FAA for Repair Station Certification under FAR Part 43 and Part 91, evidence of such application shall be submitted to the City.

If the Operator proposes to engage in the overhaul and repair of turbine power plants, FAR Part 145 Certification must be acquired within six months of initiation of operation and a copy must be filed with the Airport Manager prior to initiation of operation.

Repair personnel must be currently and properly certificated by the FAA with ratings appropriate to the work being performed. Operator shall have and provide to the Airport evidence of all federal, state, and local licenses, certificates, and permits that are required to conduct the activity.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall provide service in this category at least eight hours daily, five days a week. During non-operating hours, the Operator shall post or make otherwise known a telephone number or other contact provisions to permit an emergency call out.

EXHIBIT A
505
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-B AIRFRAME AND POWER PLANT REPAIR Page 2
SCOPE OF SERVICE (cont.)
Personnel – The Operator shall employ sufficient personnel who are appropriately rated by the FAA for the work being performed and who hold airframe, power plant, or aircraft inspection ratings. The Operator shall have an employee on duty at all times during the required operating hours.

FEES
The Operator may be subject to payment of an annual Commercial Aviation Permit fee, which is due July 1 of every year. Permit fees and other charges are applicable in the Airport Rates and Charges schedule, as revised from time to time and approved by City Council resolution.

INSURANCE
Refer to Part 4-B “Insurance for Commercial Aeronautical Activities.” (Depending upon the specific activities of the Operator, certain coverage requirements may not apply and may be waived, in writing, by the City’s Risk Manager.)

EXHIBIT A
506
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-C AVIONICS AND INSTRUMENT REPAIR
An Avionics and Instrument Repair Facility Operator is an entity engaged in the business of, and providing a facility for the repair of aircraft radios and electrical systems, instruments and other accessories for aircraft. This category of services includes the sale of aircraft parts and accessories of the type repaired.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall provide, lease or sublease at least 1,000 square feet of shop/hangar space to store one aircraft, a paved area sufficient to park one aircraft with adequate tie-down facilities, and with paved access to the taxiway system.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Licenses & Certifications – The Operator shall have a FAR Part 145 Certificated Radio Repair Station for Class 1 and 2 radio repairs. Repair personnel must be currently and properly certificated by the FAA and by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with ratings appropriate to the work being performed.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall provide service in this category at least eight (8) hours daily, five (5) days a week. During non-operating hours, the Operator shall post or otherwise make known a telephone number or other contact provisions to permit an emergency call out.

Personnel – The Operator shall employ sufficient personnel who are appropriately rated by the FAA for the work being performed and who hold airframe, power plant, or aircraft inspection ratings. The Operator shall have an employee in the office at all times during the required operating hours.

EXHIBIT A
507
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-D AIR CHARTER
An Air Charter Operator is an entity that provides on-demand, non-scheduled passenger services and operates under the appropriate FAR (14 CFR Part 135 for common carriage or 14 CFR Part 125 for private carriage) with aircraft that provide no more than 30 passenger seats and are within the weight limitations established for the Airport.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall provide or lease hangar space or a paved tie-down area with adequate facilities to park all its charter aircraft and related equipment with paved access to the taxiway system. Facilities shall include customer access to restrooms, public use telephone and a customer lounge. Adequate vehicular parking areas to accommodate staff and customers shall be available.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – The Operator shall have available for charter, either owned or under written lease to the Operator, at least one aircraft or helicopter, which must meet the requirements of the appropriate FAR Certificate held by the Operator.

Licenses & Certifications – The Operator shall obtain FAA certifications under one or more of FAR 61, 91, 121, 125, 135 and 137. The Operator shall provide evidence of any certification approvals, including the Registrations & Amendments under Part 298 (OST Form 4507), the FAA issued operating certificate, or any other forms that FAA or DOT may require or adopt that are pertinent to this category.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall have its services available to meet the public demand for this category at least eight (8) hours per day, five (5) days each week.

Personnel – The Operator shall have in its employ a sufficient number of qualified Commercial or Airline Transport rated pilots as required by Federal Aviation Regulations. If the Operator occupies an office, at least one employee shall be provided in the office at all times during the required operating hours. Otherwise, a telephone number or other contact provisions shall be provided to permit employee call-out during operating hours.

EXHIBIT A
508
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-D AIR CHARTER Page 2
FEES (cont.)
The Air Charter Operator shall pay landing fees pursuant to the Airport Rates and Charges Resolution No. 2007-112, and any subsequent amendments thereto as authorized by the City Council for commercial aircraft operations. The fee only applies to non-based general aviation aircraft engaged in commercial activities, e.g., air taxi, charter or cargo operations conducted under FAR Part 121 and Part 135 or other applicable FAR’s based on maximum certificated gross landing weight. Only revenue-producing operations are subject to the landing fee.

Landings of aircraft that are based at Livermore through a written tie-down or hangar lease agreement with the City or the Lessee are exempt from the fee. Further exempt from the fees are landings conducted by military and federal government aircraft as well as landings performed due to in-flight emergencies, maintenance and training.

EXHIBIT A
509
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-E AIR CARGO
An Air Cargo Operator is an entity that provides the carriage of property under the appropriate FAR and operates aircraft that are within the weight limitations established for the Airport.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall provide, lease or sublease sufficient hangar space or a paved tie-down area with adequate facilities to park its cargo aircraft. The sorting and transfer of cargo shall either be done inside the hangar, or in a manner to avoid apron congestion and the dispersion of Foreign Object Debris (FOD) on the airfield.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – The Operator shall have available for cargo transport, either owned or under written lease to the Operator, at least one aircraft or helicopter, which must meet the requirements of the appropriate FAR Certificate held by the Operator.

Licenses & Certifications – The Operator shall have and provide evidence of the appropriate FAA and DOT certifications and approvals, including the Preapplication Statement of Intent (FAA Form 8400-6), the Registrations & Amendments Under Part 298 (OST Form 4507), the FAA issued operating certificate, or any other forms that FAA or DOT may require or adopt that are pertinent to this category.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall have its services available to meet the public demand for this category.

Personnel – The Operator shall have in its employ a sufficient number of qualified pilots as appropriate under Federal Aviation Regulations.

The Air Cargo Operator shall pay landing fees pursuant to the Airport Rates and Charges Resolution No. 2007-112, and any subsequent amendments thereto as authorized by the City Council for commercial aircraft operations. The fee only applies to non-based general aviation aircraft engaged in commercial activities, e.g., air taxi, charter or cargo operations conducted under FAR Part 121 and Part 135 or other applicable FAR’s based on maximum certificated gross landing weight. Only revenue-producing operations are subject to the landing fee.

Landings of aircraft that are based at Livermore through a written tie-down or hangar lease

EXHIBIT A
510
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-E AIR CARGO Page 2
FEES (cont.)
agreement with the City or the Lessee are exempt from the fee. Further exempt from the fees are landings conducted by military and federal government aircraft as well as landings performed due to in-flight emergencies, maintenance and training.

EXHIBIT A
511
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-F FLIGHT TRAINING / AIRCRAFT RENTAL
A Flight Training/Aircraft Rental Facility Operator is an entity engaged in instructing pilots in dual and solo flight training, in fixed or rotary wing aircraft, and provides such related ground school instruction as is necessary preparatory to taking a written examination and flight check for the category or categories of pilot’s licenses and ratings involved. This category of services includes provisions for the rental of aircraft to the public. A person holding a current FAA flight instructor’s certificate, who gives occasional flight instruction (does not make flight instruction available to the general public) to an owner of an aircraft in the owner’s aircraft, shall not be deemed a commercial aeronautical activity.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall construct, lease or sublease a paved area with adequate tie-down facilities to park all aircraft available for flight training and/or rental with paved access to the taxiway system and adequate vehicle parking to accommodate all activities of the Operator and all approved Sublessee(s), employees and customers.

The Operator shall further construct, lease or sublease at least 1,000 square feet of floor space that includes a classroom, administrative office, and/or pilot briefing room and a lounge.

Maintenance and hangar areas are required if Operator is conducting aircraft maintenance on aircraft owned, leased, and/or operated by Operator. If Operator provides aircraft maintenance on other aircraft, Operator shall meet the minimum standards for an Aircraft Maintenance Operator.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – The Operator shall have available for use in flight training, either owned or under written lease to the Operator, at least two (2) certificated and currently airworthy aircraft appropriate to the flight training to be conducted.

Licenses & Certifications – The Operator shall conduct the flight school activities under FAR Part 61 or Part 141. If the Operator is a FAR Part 141 approved flight school, the Operator shall provide and display evidence of such FAA certification.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall have its premises open and services available to meet the public demand for this category at least eight (8) hours per day, five (5) days each week.

Personnel – The Operator shall have in its employ sufficient flight and ground instructors who meet the standards expressed under FAR Part 91 or Part 141 for the contemplated operation.

If renting aircraft, the Operator shall have in its employ a person or persons having current flight instructor ratings for the contemplated operation.

EXHIBIT A
512
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-F FLIGHT TRAINING / AIRCRAFT RENTAL Page 2
SCOPE OF SERVICE (cont.)
The Operator shall provide at least one employee in the facility office at all times during the required operating hours.

FLIGHT SCHOOL SECURITY
The Operator shall comply with Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and, as appropriate, local flight school security and pilot background check requirements.

INSURANCE
Refer to Part 4-B “Insurance for Commercial Aeronautical Activities.” Disclosure Requirement: Any Operator conducting Aircraft rental, sales, or Flight Training shall post a notice and incorporate within the rental and instruction agreements the coverage and limits provided to the renter or student by Operator, as well as a statement advising that additional coverage is available to such renter or student through the purchase of an individual non-ownership liability policy.
(Depending upon the specific activities of the Operator, certain coverage requirements may not apply and may be waived, in writing, by the City’s Risk Manager.)

EXHIBIT A
513
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-G AIRCRAFT SALES
An Aircraft Sales Facility Operator is an entity engaged in the sale of new or used aircraft through franchises or licensed dealership or distributorship (either on a retail or wholesale basis) of an aircraft manufacturer or otherwise; and provides such repair, services and parts as necessary to meet any guarantee or warranty on new or used aircraft sold by it.

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall provide, lease or sublease at least 1,000 square feet of shop/office space from which sales activities can be performed. The Operator shall further provide, lease or sublease a paved area with adequate tie-down facilities to park four (4) aircraft, with paved access to the taxiway system.

Note: Operators leasing space in a multi-tenant facility are exempt from these requirements.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – The Operator shall provide, or have available with advance notice, aircraft of each model offered for sale, for the purpose of demonstration.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall have its services available to meet the public demand for this category.

Personnel – The Operator shall employ, or have available on call, a sufficient number of pilots with ratings appropriate to the operational requirements of the aircraft being sold. The Operator shall provide at least one employee in the facility office at all times during the required operating hours.

Warranty Repairs & Services - If the Operator is FAA rated to perform warranty repairs and services and has adequate facilities to perform such work, such repairs and services shall be required. Otherwise, the Operator selling aircraft with guarantee or warranty assurances shall be obligated to arrange for proper repair and service of those aircraft.

INSURANCE
Refer to Part 4-B “Insurance for Commercial Aeronautical Activities.”

EXHIBIT A
514
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-G AIRCRAFT SALES Page 2
INSURANCE (cont.)
(Depending upon the specific activities of the Operator, certain coverage requirements may not apply and may be waived, in writing, by the City’s Risk Manager.)

EXHIBIT A
515
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-H SPECIALIZED AVIATION SERVICE OPERATOR (SASO)
A “SASO” is an Operator engaged in providing one or more of the commercial aeronautical activities defined in Parts 3-B through 3-G, including, but not limited to the following, additional specialized services:

Limited Aircraft Services and Support – defined as limited engine or accessory support, e.g., washing, detailing, painting, upholstery, magneto repairs, propeller repair and balancing, etc., or other miscellaneous activities directly related to aircraft services and support. Mobile Limited Aircraft Services and Support Operator will not be required to sublease space or facilities; however, written approval from each FBO where the Operator intends to operate is required. If only one FBO provides such approval, mobile operations will be limited to that FBO’s leasehold only. Each FBO granting such approval is entitled to charge a concession or access fee in lieu of rent, and in compensation for access to leasehold property improved at the risk and expense of the FBO.

Commercial Activity Support – defined as ground school, simulator training, charter flight coordinators, aircrew or aviation management or any other miscellaneous activities directly related to supporting or providing support services for a commercial activity.

Air Transportation Services for Hire – defined as non-stop sightseeing flights (airplane or helicopter flights that begin and end at Livermore Airport and are conducted within 25 statute miles of Livermore; aerial photography or survey; fire fighting; power line, underground cable or pipeline patrol; banner towing, crop dusting or any other miscellaneous activities directly related to air transportation service for hire (for example, helicopter operations in construction or repair work).

In addition to the general requirements in Part 2, the following minimum requirements must be met:

GROUND SPACE, FACILITIES AND ACCOMMODATIONS
The Operator shall sublease at least 1,000 square feet of shop/office space dedicated to its sole use and adequate for its operation from an FBO or other tenant under lease with the City of Livermore. The Operator shall provide sufficient automobile parking spaces dedicated for its customers use.

Note: Operators leasing space in a multi-tenant facility are exempt from these requirements.

SCOPE OF SERVICE
Aircraft – When required by the nature of its operation, the Operator shall provide and have based on its leasehold, either owned or under written lease to lessee, at least one airworthy aircraft, meeting all FAA requirements and applicable regulations of the State of California with respect to the type of activity performed.

EXHIBIT A
516
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 3-H SPECIALIZED AVIATION SERVICE OPERATOR (SASO) Page 2 SCOPE OF SERVICE (cont.)
Personnel – The Operator shall employ a sufficient number of properly licensed and certified personnel to safely carry out the activity and meet the demand of the public for the services provided. The Operator shall provide at least one employee in the facility office at all times during the required operating hours.

Environmental – If applicable through the nature of its operation, the Operator must comply with the requirements of the City’s Hazardous Materials Permit.

Licenses & Certifications – The Operator shall have and provide evidence of all Federal, State and local certificates, permits, etc., required for the activity.

Operating Hours – The Operator shall have its services available to meet the public demand for this category.

EXHIBIT A
517
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 4-A INSURANCE FOR FIXED BASE OPERATORS
In addition to the general requirements in Part 2 and Part 3-A, the following minimum requirements must be met:

Operator shall procure and maintain for the duration of the ground lease, sublease, or occupancy of the leased premises insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from, or in connection with the Operator’s operation, use of the Premises or this Lease, which shall be acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Operator.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (“occurrence” form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Property Insurance against all risks of loss to any tenant improvements or betterments, including flood and earthquake, if such are available at a reasonable cost, as determined by the Risk Manager.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Operator shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: $5,000,000 ($25,000,000 if Full Service FBO or self-fueling permit holder) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Coverage shall include but not be limited to: blanket contractual; products/completed operations; hangarkeepers liability, and broad form property damage.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury or disease. (4) Property Insurance: Full replacement cost with no coinsurance penalty provision.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions or sub limits must be declared to and approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
d. Other Insurance Provision
The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

EXHIBIT A
518
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 4-A INSURANCE FOR FIXED BASE OPERATORS Page 2
d. Other Insurance Provision (cont.)
(1) The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of Premises owned, occupied or used by the Operator. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (2) The Operator’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Operator’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (4) Coverage shall state that the Operator’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Livermore by the carrier.
e. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, licensed to do business in California.
f. Verification of Coverage
Operator shall furnish a copy of these requirements to Operator’s insurance agent. The agent shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with Certificate(s) of Insurance and original endorsements evidencing coverage required by this clause. By sending the requisite documents, the agent is certifying the Operator maintains the appropriate coverage.

The documents are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage and endorse policies on its behalf. All documents are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before Operator takes possession, or begins work on the Premises. The City of Livermore may for any reason require the Operator to provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies affecting the coverage required by these specifications. The Operator, or its insurance agent, shall furnish the City with evidence of insurance 30 days prior to expiration of the current certificate(s), and direct those to:

City of Livermore
Risk Manager
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550

EXHIBIT A
519
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 4-B INSURANCE FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES In addition to the general requirements in Part 2 and Part 3-B through 3-H, the following minimum requirements must be met:

Operator shall procure and maintain for the duration of the ground lease, sublease, or occupancy of the leased premises insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from, or in connection with the Operator’s operation, use of the Premises or this Lease, which shall be acceptable to the City’s Risk Manager. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Operator.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (“occurrence” form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker’s Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Property Insurance against all risks of loss to any tenant improvements or betterments, including flood and earthquake, if such are available at a reasonable cost, as determined by the Risk Manager.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance
Operator shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Coverage shall include but not be limited to:
blanket contractual; products/completed operations; hangarkeepers liability, and broad form property damage.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury or disease. (4) Property Insurance: Full replacement cost with no coinsurance penalty provision.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions or sub limits must be declared to and approved by the City’s Risk Manager.
d. Other Insurance Provision
The general liability policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

EXHIBIT A
520
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 4-B INSURANCE FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Page 2 d. Other Insurance Provision (cont.)
(1) The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of Premises owned, occupied or used by the Operator. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (2) The Operator’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Operator’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. (4) Coverage shall state that the Operator’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City of Livermore by the carrier.
e. Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, licensed to do business in California.
f. Verification of Coverage
Operator shall furnish a copy of these requirements to Operator’s insurance agent. The agent shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with Certificate(s) of Insurance and original endorsements evidencing coverage required by this clause. By sending the requisite documents, the agent is certifying the Operator maintains the appropriate coverage.

City of Livermore
Risk Manager
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550

EXHIBIT A
521
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
PART 5 APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Applications to perform any commercial aeronautical activities shall be in writing by using this form and filed with the Airport Manager. The application must demonstrate compliance with Part 2 and the specific requirements under Part 3-A through H and must contain the following information listed below.

Business Plan: All prospective FBO Operators who intend to dispense fuel pursuant to these Minimum Standards must submit, in addition to this application, a detailed Business Plan that clearly demonstrates the economic viability of the proposed activity, including any information necessary to demonstrate that fuel sales projections will be incremental new business to the Airport rather than a dilution of the market share from existing, approved FBO Operators. The Business Plan will be subject to approval by the Airport Manager, who will consider the economic vitality of the existing Airport tenants as well as the volume of the existing fuel market in the context of the appropriate number of fuel vendors.

Space has been provided for response to each question. In many cases, it may be necessary to attach the requested information. If so, please indicated as “See attached – Exhibit .“ Care should be taken in preparing this application as any incomplete or incorrect information may delay the processing of the application.

PLEASE NOTE: Consistent with applicable law, any financial information you submit may be confidential. If you wish to request that the financial information you submit be kept confidential, you must submit such information in a separate attached exhibit so indicated.

Other information submitted as part of this Application will be made available to the public upon request.

1. Basic Business Information
Name of Business:

Airport Location:
(Provide copy of sublease & drawings describing facilities and auto parking areas.) Mailing Address:

Telephone:

Type of Business
Services offered:

Commencement Date:

Days per Week and Hours of Operation:

EXHIBIT A
522
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 5 APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Page 2 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Principal Owners:

Key Personnel and Titles:

2. Certifications and Experience
Describe past experience in the specified aviation services for which application is made:

Describe experience data on key personnel, or submit resumes as separate attachments:

List all applicable local, state, and/or federal certifications and licenses currently held or to be obtained; include copies:

EXHIBIT A
523
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 5 APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Page 3 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
If applicable, describe the number of aircraft to be utilized including makes, models, seating capacity and N-numbers and copies of any applicable FAA operating certificates:

3. Market and Financial Information
Provide a full description of the nature of the proposed operation. Include all services to be provided, number of persons to be employed, any expansion plans, etc.:

Provide a statement of need for your proposed operation at the Livermore Municipal Airport:

EXHIBIT A
524
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 5 APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Page 4 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
Provide a written confirmation of account status and history from your bank, and include a phone number of a bank representative so that the information can be verified:

PLEASE NOTE: The City reserves the right to ask for additional financial and market information in order to determine whether the Operator is reasonably fit, willing and able to discharge its economic obligations to the Airport community. Examples of additional information include, but are not limited to market analysis, cash flow, profit and loss projections, financial statements prepared by a Certified Public Accountant, credit reports on the business or each party owning or having a financial interest in the business.

4. Insurance and Other Information
List all types and amounts of insurance coverage to be maintained for the proposed operation.

Include a copy of your certificate of insurance listing the City of Livermore as additional insured and reflecting at least the minimum liability coverages for your proposed operation as required in accordance with Part 4-A or B:

If the proposed operation includes rental, sales or flight training, provide a copy of your student/renter insurance disclosure notice as well as evidence that the same notice has been incorporated in any rental agreements:

EXHIBIT A
525
Livermore Municipal Airport - Minimum Standards for Commercial Aeronautical Activities PART 5 APPLICATION FOR COMMERCIAL AERONAUTICAL ACTIVITIES Page 5 Livermore Municipal Airport – 680 Terminal Circle – Livermore, CA 94551 Office (925) 960-8220 Fax (925) 960-8235
The applicants hereby respectfully request that the City of Livermore consider the foregoing application for permission to perform the specified aeronautical activities at Livermore Municipal Airport by the following date:

To be acknowledged and signed by each principal owner. (I.e., President, General Partner, CEO, CFO, Chairman, Secretary, Treasures, etc.)
Completed by Title Date
Signed by Title Date
Signed by Title Date
Signed by Title Date
For City Use Only Approvals
Initials / Date Initials / Date
Risk Manager / Public Works Director /
Finance Director /
(if applicable)
Airport Manager /
Reviewed by Airport Commission: (if applicable) Fee paid on: (if applicable)

EXHIBIT A
526
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7.2
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marianna Marysheva, City Manager
SUBJECT: Discussion and direction regarding the City Council Subcommittee for Advisory Body Review's recommendation regarding changes to City advisory bodies.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff and the City Council Subcommittee recommend the City Council review the Subcommittee's recommendations regarding changes to City advisory bodies, and direct staff to bring back ordinances amending the Livermore Municipal Code and the Development Code at a future City Council meeting.

SUMMARY
As part of the Citywide Strategic Plan, staff reviewed each advisory body to assess their duties and responsibilities to ensure alignment with the Strategic Plan and other guiding documents. At the July 7, 2023, City Council meeting, the City Council formed a two-member City Council subcommittee for Advisory Body Review (“Subcommittee”) which consisted of Vice Mayor Kiick and Council Member Branning. Staff met with all City advisory body liaisons and reviewed the duties assigned to each body, participation, and deliverables. In August 2023, staff provided their recommendation to the Subcommittee for their review and direction. In October 2023, the Subcommittee directed staff to bring their recommendations to City Council for approval.

DISCUSSION
The City of Livermore currently has 9 standing advisory bodies that serve at the pleasure of the City Council. Each body is guided by a Rules of Procedure that lists duties and responsibilities, the makeup of the committee, and meeting procedures. As part of the Strategic Plan, staff reviewed each advisory body to assess their duties and responsibilities to ensure alignment with the Strategic Plan, and to confirm that the objectives set in the Rules of Procedure were still relevant to the work of each advisory body.

At the July 7, 2023, City Council meeting, a City Council Subcommittee for Advisory Body Review (“Subcommittee”) was formed which consisted of Vice Mayor Kiick and Council Member Branning. In August 2023, staff provided their recommendations to the Subcommittee. The significant changes 527
included sunsetting the Beautification Committee and Historic Preservation Commission, converting the Livermore Area Youth Advisory Commission to a Library activity instead of a city commission, and moving the management of the Commission for the Arts from the Innovation and Economic Development Department to the Library. In October 2023, the Subcommittee finalized their review and directed staff to bring the recommendations to the City Council for consideration.

Recommended Actions
Beautification Committee
Recommendation: Sunset.

For many years, several of the duties and responsibilities of the Committee have fallen to staff due to the need for technical expertise not required of advisory body members. Two examples include:

1. Review the designs for the establishment of small parks or rest areas at street intersections. This review is completed by Engineering and Planning staff. The committee does not receive referrals for this type of review.

2. Recommend revisions of the street tree ordinance, specifying tree types, installation standards, spacing dimensions, and other related matters for the implantation of decorative trees in all areas to be developed within the city in both residential and commercial areas. This function requires the knowledge of an arborist, of which the city has six on staff.

In addition to duties that require technical knowledge, other duties are for programs that have ended or do not have funding. These include:

1. Recommend an annual program by the city for the placement of street trees in all areas deficient in such improvements. This program ended many years ago.

2. Recommend replacement landscaping, planting and maintenance standards for all of the landscape maintenance districts within the City of Livermore, staff noted there are limited funds in the Landscape Maintenance Districts for any changes.

Sunsetting the Beautification Committee would result in the need for additional changes as well.

Although not listed in the duties and responsibilities of the Committee, tree permit appeals are listed in the Livermore Municipal Code as being appealed to the Beautification Committee. Staff is currently in the process of updating the street tree ordinance which includes the appeal process. The updated ordinance will be presented to the City Council in early 2024 and will include the recommendation to have appeals heard by an independent third party, similar to Neighborhood Preservation appeals.

The remaining two activities exclusive to the Committee are the Beautification Awards and the Arbor Day activity. If the City Council chooses to continue these activities, they can both be managed by staff and volunteers. The Subcommittee recommends staff reach out to current Beautification Committee members for future volunteer opportunities such as Beautification Awards, Arbor Day, and Community Service Day.

Commission for the Arts
Recommendation: Move Management of this Advisory Body to the Library In November 2022, the city adopted the Livermore Cultural Arts Vision entitled: Creative Livermore A 528
Plan for the Future of the Arts and Culture. Given that this strategic plan is more focused on programs instead of physical pieces of art the library would be the ideal department to manage the Advisory Body moving forward. The Library specializes in a variety of cultural arts and youth and family programing and has large outreach in the community. Library staff are also very familiar with grant funding which is a key function of the Commission.

Historic Preservation Commission
Recommendation: Sunset.

From February 2020 to April 2021, staff worked with a consultant, the Historic Preservation Commission, and the City Historian to modify the City’s historic preservation program. The group worked together to create a citywide historic context statement, inventoried City parcels for historic significance, revised the Certificate of Appropriateness standards, and updated the Development Code, Zoning Map, and Downtown Specific plan to implement the changes. These changes reduced the number of City properties that were required to go through the historic review process from approximately 14,000 down to approximately 290. One item included in the City's Strategic Plan involves working with property owners to ensure changes to historic resources are consistent with the City’s Historic Preservation Program requirements which could reduce the inventory of historic properties even more.

Prior to the updated program, a large number of properties were required to be reviewed for historical significance based on the age of the building being 50 years or older, not on actual historical significance. After the program update, the Historic Preservation Commission was required to review only a handful of projects. The Commission has only held five meetings in the last three years and has not met in 2023.

The Subcommittee and staff recommend sunsetting the Historic Preservation Commission and assigning review of historical projects and the interview of the City Historian to the Planning Commission which would require a Development Code amendment. Staff would increase training to the Planning Commission regarding historic preservation to prepare them for historic reviews. If the City Council recommends the Historic Preservation Commission be sunset, staff will bring a Development Code Amendment to the Planning Commission in early 2024.

Current members of the Commission will be encouraged to apply for City Historian in the upcoming recruitment.

Livermore Area Youth Advisory Commission
Recommendation: Convert the body from a City Commission to a Library activity.

The Commission is currently managed by library staff who shared that the Commission, at times, is hindered by the requirements and formality of the Brown Act. Some examples include cancelling meetings due to a lack of quorum during SAT and AP testing at the high schools or requiring immediate pickups from parents when meetings are cancelled due to a lack of quorum at the start of the meeting. If the Commission was not a Brown Act body, the Commissioners who were available to attend could stay at the meeting and continue to work on objectives. In addition, open conversations with local youth could occur at meetings, instead of only being able to provide public comment during certain parts of the agenda. By converting the Commission to an activity, it opens opportunities to more youth than the 529
current 15 members of the Commission.

Staff created a Youth in Government Framework, which outlines multiple ways to engage youth in leadership and civic experiences. The library currently has robust youth programming, and the youth commission could be incorporated into other youth activities. If the need arose, the City Council could still assign activities to the former commission.

Changes to Remaining Advisory Bodies
The Rules of Procedure for the remaining commissions including the Airport Commission, Human Services Commission, Livermore Housing Authority, Library Board of Directors, and the Planning Commission will be revised with minor edits such as changing guidance from the former City Council Goals and Priorities to the Citywide Strategic Plan and requiring all commissions to create an annual work plan at their first meeting in January. Redline versions of those changes are attached to the staff report.

Timeline
If the City Council directs staff to move forward with the above Subcommittee recommendations, staff will bring a Development Code Amendment in early 2024 to the Planning Commission recommending the Historic Preservation Committee be sunset and the remaining duties be assigned to the Planning Commission. Once approved by the Planning Commission the item would return to the City Council.

Staff would return with ordinances amending the Livermore Municipal Code and the Livermore Development Code and bring revised Rules of Procedure for each remaining body to the City Council for consideration.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
Reduced staff time from no longer administering the sunsetting advisory bodies is the only fiscal and administrative impact.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
2: Engage effectively with the City's Advisory Bodies

ATTACHMENTS

1. Redlined Airport Commission Rules of Procedure

2. Redlined Beautification Committee Rules of Procedure

3. Redlined Commission for the Arts Rules of Procedure

4. Redlined Historic Preservation Commission Rules of Procedure

5. Redlined Human Services Commission Rules of Procedure

6. Redlined Livermore Area Youth Advisory Commission Rules of Procedure

7. Redlined Library Board of Trustees Rules of Procedure

8. Redlined Livermore Housing Authority Rules of Procedure 530

9. Redlined Planning Commission Rules of Procedure
Prepared by: Debbie Elam
Assistant City Clerk
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
531

CITY OF LIVERMORE

AIRPORT COMMISSION

RULES OF PROCEDURE
Prepared by the City Clerk’s Office
April 2022 December 2023 - DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 1
532

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 1

AIRPORT COMMISSION

RULES OF PROCEDURE

1. Duties and Responsibilities:

The City Council declares that the individuals appointed to the office of Airport Commissioner are intended to represent and further the interest of the aviation industry and that such representation and furtherance will ultimately serve the public interest. Accordingly, the City Council finds that for purposes of persons who hold such office, the aviation industry is tantamount to and constitutes the public generally within the meaning of Section 87103 of the Government Code.

The Airport Commission shall have the following duties and responsibilities:

1. The Commission is advisory to the City Council on:
a. Determinations of demand in support of future Airport development pursuant to section 1 of Resolution 2010-058;
b. Rendering a determination whether redevelopment of existing facilities may occur based upon need for significant rehabilitation, improvement or replacement; and
c. Other Airport matters initiated and referred to the Commission by the City Council.

2. The Commission is advisory to the Planning Commission on:
a. Proposed development within the City’s Airport Protection Area (APA) including proposed changes to the APA or the zoning at the Airport,

3. The Commission supports the goals and priorities 5-Year Strategic Plan adopted by the City Council relative to the Airport’s operations.

4. The Commission promotes the Airport as an economic development tool and disaster recovery facility that benefits Livermore residents and the Tri-Valley.

5. The Commission promotes public interest in the Airport and promotes public participation in its use and operation.

6. The Commission has a regulatory responsibility to:

ATTACHMENT 1
533

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 2
a. Make a commercial aeronautical activity appeal determination pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 11.08.1060;
b. Amend and approve the large hangar waiting list policy pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 11.08.1080; and
c. Conduct appeal hearings pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section

11.08.190.

7. The Commission is advisory to staff on:
a. Airport safety and security matters;
b. Operational policies and regulations pertaining to tenants and users of the Airport;
c. The Airport noise monitoring and reduction program;
d. Planning for public and private development on the Airport, consistent with adopted City General Plan policies, the adopted Community Development Code (Zoning Code), and the adopted 20 Year Capital Improvement Program Budget;
e. The draft 20-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget; and f. Other matters related to the Airport that are initiated and referred by staff to the Commission.

8. The Commission will create an annual workplan at the first meeting in January.

2. Members – The Airport Commission shall consist of five members, all of whom must be residents of the City of Livermore. At least three of the members must be certificated pilots, but no more than two three members shall be tenants or subtenants of the Livermore Airport.

3. Term of Office – Airport Commission members shall serve no more than two consecutive four-year terms or a total of eight years unless the member was selected to complete an unexpired term or unless otherwise noted. However, members may be appointed back to the Airport Commission after a break in service of two years.

Time served in an unexpired term shall not count against the eight-year maximum limit. Commission members who have already completed eight years of service or other specified maximum terms are not eligible for appointment to an unexpired term.

4. Attendance Policy – Airport Commission members may miss three meetings per calendar year. A member who misses more than three meetings per year may be subject to removal from the Commission. The staff liaison will document all absences and report to the City Clerk when a member of the Commission has exceeded the allowed number of absences. The City Clerk will notify the City ATTACHMENT 1
534

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 3
Council with a memo explaining the circumstances of the absences and the City Council will determine if an agenda item is needed to consider whether removal from the Commission is appropriate. The member will have the opportunity to speak at a City Council meeting when removal is under consideration. The final decision to remove a member from the Commission rests solely with the City Council.

5. Elections and Officers – The Airport Commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the first meeting held after January 1st of each year. Election of the officers shall be by majority vote of the Commission. The role of the officers shall be as follows:
a. Chairperson – The Chairperson shall preside at all regular meetings and may call special meetings. The Chairperson shall decide upon all points of order and procedure during the meeting.
b. Vice Chairperson - The Vice Chairperson shall assume all duties of the Chairperson in the absence or disability of the Chairperson. c. Presiding Officer – In the absence of the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson, the members present shall select a Presiding Officer.

6. Meetings – The Airport Commission shall meet on the first Monday of each month at 6:30 p.m., unless otherwise specified by posted notice. The Commission shall adopt an annual meeting calendar listing all regular meetings for the calendar year. The calendar shall be published on the City's website.

Meetings shall be held at the William H. Mendenhall Community Room at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA. All meetings shall be open to the public.

The Commission may not meet in closed session. Commission members may not participate in a meeting remotely, via teleconference or videoconference.

7. Agenda Preparation and Posting – The staff liaison shall post the notices and agendas for each Airport Commission meeting in the kiosk in front of the Civic Center Meeting Hall, the Civic Center Library and on the City’s website. a. Regular Meetings
Agendas shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Brown Act and shall be posted in a location that is freely accessible to members of the public at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the meeting and contain a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. [54954.2] b. Special Meetings and Workshops
ATTACHMENT 1
535

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 4
Notice of the call for a special meeting must be delivered and received by each Commission Member and the media at least 24 hours before the special meeting and must be posted at least 24 hours before the special meeting date. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the meeting, contain a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting, and state who called the special meeting. [54956].

8. Minutes of Proceedings – An account of all final actions or recommendations of the Airport Commission shall be prepared by the staff liaison and approved by the Commission. The staff liaison with input from the City Clerk, and consistent with the uniform format provided by the City Clerk, shall determine the preferred software/recording device used to capture the minutes for their advisory body meetings. Minutes shall be provided for Commission consideration and approval as action minutes.

9. Quorum – Three members constitute a quorum of the Airport Commission. A quorum of the members must be present to conduct any business. In the absence of a quorum at a meeting, the meeting must be adjourned. The matters listed on the agenda shall be taken up at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Commission or scheduled for a special meeting if deemed necessary. A meeting may also be declared adjourned in advance, if absence notifications received by staff create a lack of a quorum, or if staff determines that there is not current business pending before the Airport Commission. Cancellations of meetings must comply with the requirements of the Brown Act.

ATTACHMENT 1
536

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 5
d. Call to Order - The Chairperson shall call the meeting to order at the appointed time. If both the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson are absent, then the staff liaison shall call the meeting to order, and the Commission Members present shall then select a presiding officer for that meeting.
e. Preservation of Order - The Chairperson shall preserve strict order and decorum, and shall discourage personal,verbal attacks on Commission Members, staff, and/or citizens, but shall not prohibit criticisms of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the City, or of the acts or omissions of the Airport Commission or members of the City staff. The Chairperson shallconfine debate to the item under discussion. [36813, 38638, 54954.3, 54957.9].

f. Reordering of Agenda - The Chairperson may reorder the items on the agenda for a noticed meeting to accommodate members of the public who wish to speak on an agenda item that would otherwise be considered by the Airport Commission later in the meeting. The Chairperson shall announce the reorder prior to calling members of the public to speak during citizens’ open forum.
g. Motion to be Stated - The Chairperson shall state all motions submitted for a vote by the Airport Commission and announce the result of the vote and identify the no votes and any Commission Members that abstained or recused themselves from the vote. No action shall be taken by secret ballot, but electronic tabulation may be used to record, and report roll call votes. [54953(b)(2) and (c)(2)].

11. Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments
Every agenda shall provide the opportunity for members of the public to address the Airport Commission on subjects which are not listed on the agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. The Chairperson may establish time limits per individual speaker. The Commission shall not discuss nor take action on subjects raised under Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments; but the Chairperson, with the concurrence of a majority of the Commission, may direct staff to place subjects raised under Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments on a future Commission agenda.

12. Subcommittees
The Airport Commission may create standing subcommittees (those with ongoing subject matter jurisdiction and regularly scheduled meetings). Such subcommittees shall be subject to all City policies and the requirements of the Brown Act.

ATTACHMENT 1
537

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 6

13. Staff Support and Responsibilities
The head of the department that is responsible for supporting the Airport Commission shall designate the Airport Manager or another employee to serve as staff liaison to the Commission.

The Staff Liaison shall prepare and post the agenda, take and maintain meeting minutes, prepare other documents as directed by the Chairperson, and generally assist the Commission in performing its duties. The Staff Liaison shall have no voting authority.

Staff shall be responsible for recommending to Council approval of Airport rates and charges, operating expenditure and revenue budgets, and operating and replacement reserves.

Commissioners must work with their assigned staff liaison and the liaison’s Department Head to obtain the City Council’s approval before beginning any self-initiated project that will require more than 8 hours of staff time to complete that year. However, the Commission may pursue self-initiated projects that can be accomplished utilizing the city resources currently allocated to the particular advisory body and that do not take resources away from that advisory body’s anticipated work to fulfill its duties and responsibilities to the City Council.

14. Rules of Parliamentary Procedure
The City Council has adopted Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Revised 2011, as its rules of parliamentary procedure for the City Council and all Boards and Commissions. In the event of a conflict between Rosenberg’s Rules of Order and these rules of procedure, these rules of procedure shall control.

15. Types of Meetings

15.1 Regular Meetings
The Airport Commission shall meet in the William H. Mendenhall Community Room for all regular Commission meetings. The regular meetings shall begin on the first Monday of each month at 6:30 p.m., unless otherwise specified by posted notice. If the meeting date falls on a legal holiday, the Airport Commission shall meet at a date and time designated by the Commission.

15.2 Special Meetings
Special meetings may be called by the Commission Chair, the Commission liaison or by a majority of Commissioners. The call and notice for a special ATTACHMENT 1
538

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 7
meeting must specify the items to be considered and the date, time, and location for the meeting. [36807, 54956(a)].

The Airport Commission may take final action at a special meeting that is not a workshop.

15.3 Special Meeting Workshops
The Airport Commission may meet informally in special meetings designated as workshops that are called by the Chairperson, the Commission liaison, or by a majority of Commission Members. Workshops are special meetings intended for training purposes such as ethics training, sexual harassment prevention and education, and specific technical subjects.

Workshops are open to the public and are meetings for purposes of the Brown Act. The Airport Commission may provide direction, but unlike other special meetings the Airport Commission may not take a final action at a workshop. [54956].

15.4 Adjourned Meetings, and Adjourned Regular Meetings Any meeting of the Airport Commission may be adjourned to a later date, time, and location, and the notice of adjournment shall be posted within 24 hours on or near the door of the place where the adjourned meeting was held. However, if the adjourned meeting is to reconvene less than 24 hours after adjournment, then a copy of the order or notice of the continuance shall be posted immediately following the meeting. [36809, 54955].

The Chairperson, Commission liaison, or majority of Members may call for an adjourned regular meeting in consultation with the City Attorney to conduct a regular meeting on a date other than on a regular meeting date on the Airport Commission’s annual calendar. [54955]

16. Actions Limited to Posted Agendas
The Airport Commission shall not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the posted notice or agenda for that meeting. However, as permitted by the Brown Act, Commission Members and staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by the Airport Commission or by members of the public addressing the Airport Commission. Commission Members may ask a question of City staff or a speaker for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their own activities.

17. Continuance of Agenda Items
ATTACHMENT 1
539

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 8
Items listed on a posted agenda should not be continued or postponed absent good cause.

17.1 Discovery of Good Cause Before an Item is Considered If good cause to continue an item is discovered by City staff after a notice or agenda is posted but before the meeting commences, then after calling the meeting to order the Chair shall identify the item and announce that is has been continued.

17.2 Good Cause to Continue During Consideration
Once an item has been taken up for consideration, City staff, a Commission Member, or a participating party as defined in Section 21.4.4 Participating Parties may request a continuance of the item. The item may only be continued following a majority vote of the Commission Members present.

17.3 Public Comment for a Continued Item
If the opportunity for the public to address the Airport Commission has concluded and the item was returned to the Airport Commission for deliberation before it was continued, then the opportunity for public comment on the item will not be reopened absent a motion by the Airport Commission. [54955].

18. Consideration of items after 11:00 p.m.

18.1 Canvass and Reorder
At 10:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, the Chairperson shall canvass staff and Commissioners present to identify the remaining agenda items for consideration. The Chairperson will then identify what items will be considered or continued, and in what order. Once the Chairperson outlines the balance of the agenda, it may not be amended absent an appeal by a Commission Member.

18.2 No New Items Considered after 11:00 p.m.

Generally, the Airport Commission will not begin consideration of any items on an agenda after 11:00 p.m., but may complete their consideration of an item that was commenced prior to 11:00 p.m.

18.3 Exceptions
The Airport Commission may commence consideration of an item after 11:00 p.m. under the following circumstances:

ATTACHMENT 1
540

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 9
a. An item is subject to a legal deadline, such as a project application subject to the Permit Streamlining Act; or,

b. The Airport Commission votes to allow consideration of the item after 11:00 p.m.

19. Points of Order, Privilege, and Personal Privilege
A Commission Member may ask for a point of order, at which time the Chairperson will ask for an explanation. Appropriate points of order relate to matters that a Commission Member considers inappropriate conduct for the meeting, such as the failure to observe these Rules of Procedure or the rules of parliamentary procedure.

A Commission Member may seek a point of privilege. If so, the Chairperson shall ask for an explanation of the Commission Member’s point. Points of privilege generally relate to matters that interfere with a normal flow or comfort of the Airport Commission’s meeting, such as the inability to hear testimony because of disruption.

A Commission Member may ask for a point of personal privilege when the integrity, character, or motives of the Commission Member are called into question by a speaker; or where the welfare of the Airport Commission is concerned.

If a speaker is interrupted by a point of order, privilege, or personal privilege, the remainder of a speaker’s time will be preserved by the staff liaison until the point is resolved.

20. Minutes - An account of all final actions or recommendations of the Airport Commission shall be prepared by the staff liaison and approved by the Commission. The staff liaison with input from the City Clerk, and consistent with the uniform format provided by the City Clerk, shall determine the preferred software/recording device used to capture the minutes for their advisory body meetings. Minutes shall be provided for Commission consideration and approval as action minutes.

20.1 Approval
The minutes for an Airport Commission meeting shall be reviewed and approved as set forth in this section.
a. The Airport Commission shall approve minutes for a regular meeting, special meeting, and special meeting workshops.

ATTACHMENT 1
541

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 10
b. An Airport Commissioner may not approve the minutes for any meeting that the Commissioner did not attend.

Also, an Airport Commissioner may not approve the minutes for a meeting that they were not eligible to attend as a commissioner.
c. If no Commissioners are eligible to approve the minutes for an Airport Commission meeting, then the staff liaison shall attest to the accuracy of the meeting minutes and enter them into official minute books.

20.2 Preferred Method of Recordation and Minutes
Airport Commission liaisons shall take an audio recording of each meeting and keep them in accordance with the City’s Records Retention Schedule. Minutes of Airport Commission meetings shall be action minutes that capture the action taken by the Airport Commission and the outcome of each agenda item.

20.3 Staff Attendance & Development of Agenda - Staff attendance and agenda development will be determined by the staff liaison for the advisory body.

21. Order of Business – Regular Meetings
The usual order of business for regular meetings shall be as follows:

21.1. Call to Order
This portion of the agenda is for roll call and the pledge of allegiance.

21.2. Citizens’ Open Forum
This portion of the agenda is for any member of the public to address the Airport Commission on any item of interest to the public that is within the Airport Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. However, to prepare and preserve a proper administrative record, public comments concerning an item listed elsewhere on the agenda should be reserved and addressed to the Airport Commission when that item is called for consideration.

Citizens’ Open forum shall be limited to 30 minutes, usually before the consent calendar. If there are additional members of the public who wish to speak at the conclusion of the 30-minute time period, then the Chair shall reconvene the citizens’ open forum at the conclusion of the matters for consideration portion of the agenda unless the Chair announces that citizens’ open forum is reordered to a different place on the agenda.

The procedures for public comments during the citizens’ open forum are set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

ATTACHMENT 1
542

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 11

21.3. Consent Calendar
The consent calendar portion of the agenda is for routine items that are not expected to require Airport Commission discussion. Examples of items for the consent calendar include the approval of minutes. Any Airport Commissioner may pull an item for separate discussion. Members of the public may address the Airport Commission on consent calendar items by following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

The items on the consent calendar are generally approved by the Airport Commission by a single motion, but separate motions may be appropriate to accommodate a conflict of interest, an absence, or other Commission Member interests.

21.4. Matters for Consideration
This portion of the agenda is for items of business that require Airport Commission action, direction, or receipt of reports that do not also require a public hearing. The procedures for this portion of the agenda follow the following procedure:

21.4.1 Introduction
The Chairperson shall call each item for hearing and consideration. If there are public hearing items, the Chairperson has the discretion to concurrently call the items for hearing and consideration.

21.4.2 Staff Presentation
A member of City staff will then:
a. Introduce themselves and the item by identifying the report and other written material included in the agenda packet for the Airport Commission’s consideration, as well as any written comments received from the public. b. Identify any supplemental written materials that have been provided to the Airport Commission for consideration, which were received or prepared for the item after the meeting agenda was published.
c. Identify any other staff members or consultants that will be part of the staff presentation or are otherwise present and available for the Airport Commission questions.
d. State whether the applicant is present and whether the applicant intends to make a presentation to the Airport Commission.

ATTACHMENT 1
543

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 12
e. Make an oral report, unless waived by the Airport Commission.

21.4.3 Airport Commission Questions or Comments
Following the staff presentation, the Commission Members may ask questions of City staff and consultants or make comments on the item.

21.4.4 Participating Parties
Following Commission Member questions and comments after the staff presentation, the applicant, appellant, and other named participant in the item that is party to an agenda item (collectively “participating parties”) may address the Commission. After the Chair determines that no other participating parties wish to address the Airport Commission on the hearing item, the Chairperson will then invite Commission Member questions or comments of the participating parties and staff concerning the item.

Participating parties shall address the Airport Commission following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

21.4.5 Opportunity for Public Comment
The purpose of the public hearing is to provide members of the public with an opportunity to address the Airport Commission concerning the item, as well as to express their support or opposition of the item. The Chairperson will formally announce the opening of the public comment period and invite members of the public to address the Airport Commission on the item. Public speakers shall address the Airport Commission following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

After the Chairperson determines that no other member of the public wishes to address the Airport Commission on the hearing item, the Chairperson will formally close the public comment period and return the item to the Airport Commission for deliberation.

21.4.6 Deliberation
Once an item of business returns to the Airport Commission for deliberation, the Chairperson will invite the Commission Members to discuss the item to develop concurrence for a motion. Commission Members may ask questions of staff and the participating parties as part of their deliberations.

21.4.7. Airport Commission Action
ATTACHMENT 1
544

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 13
After Airport Commission deliberation, the Chairperson shall call for a motion and a second as set forth in Section 25 Motions, and the Airport Commission may make such motions as set forth in that section.

If the motion seconded for consideration is substantially different than the recommended action in the published staff report, the Chairperson may invite public comments on the motion. Each speaker will be limited to one minute to comment on the motion; and the Airport Commission has discretion to decide not to hear further comment if they choose. Public speakers shall address the Airport Commission following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

Prior to deliberating on matters for consideration, the Airport Commission shall receive public comment as provided for in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

After receiving public comment, the Airport Commission shall deliberate and shall receive the report, take action, or provide direction as set forth in Section 25 Motions.

21.5 Reports and Matters Initiated
This portion of the agenda is for:
a. Each member of the Airport Commission to provide brief reports on any conferences, training, community meetings, or other events of interest to the community that the Commissioner attended at the City’s expense [53232.2(d)].
b. The City staff to provide information of community interest to the Airport Commission and to seek direction from the Airport Commission concerning items to be included on future agendas.
c. The Airport Commission to provide guidance and direction to staff concerning items to be included on future agendas and information to be provided in response to questions raised during citizens’ open forum. d. The Airport Commission to request staff to provide information, perform studies, or undertake other administrative functions or to develop information for Commission action at a future meeting. If the requested action cannot be accomplished within the approved budget or if it will involve substantial staff resources, approval of resources would need to be provided from the City Council prior to staff completing the work.

Members of the public do not have the right to address the Airport Commission during this portion of the agenda. [54954.3(a); Coalition of Labor, Agriculture & Business v. County of Santa Barbara Bd. of Supervisors, (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 205].

ATTACHMENT 1
545

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 14

21.6 Adjournment
This portion of the agenda is for the Chairperson to adjourn the Airport Commission meeting to its next meeting. The meeting may be adjourned to a regular meeting, special meeting, special meeting workshop, adjourned regular meeting, or adjourned special meeting.

Adjournment at any other point in the meeting requires a formal motion by the Airport Commission.

22. Order of Business – Special Meetings and Workshops
No matters except those specified in the notice and agenda for a special meeting or special meeting workshop may be discussed at those meetings.

The usual order of business for special meetings and workshops shall be as follows:

22.1. Call to Order
This portion of the agenda is the same as it is for a regular meeting.

22.2. Public Comment
The purpose of this portion of the agenda is to provide the public with the opportunity to address the Airport Commission on only those items listed in the posted notice and agenda for the special meeting or workshop.

Public speakers shall address the Airport Commission following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

However, unlike a regular meeting, the agenda for a special meeting will not include a citizens’ open forum or opportunity for the public to address the Airport Commission on any item of interest to the public that is within the Airport Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction, unless that opportunity is expressly included in the agenda.

22.3 Special Meeting Item and Workshop Item
ATTACHMENT 1
546

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 15
Generally, the procedures for this portion of the agenda follow the procedures in Section 21.4.1 Introduction, 21.4.2 Staff Presentation, 21.4.3 Questions and Comments, and 21.4.6 Deliberations. The Airport Commission may take a final action at a special meeting, but not at a workshop, as set forth in Section 15.2 Special Meetings and Section 15.3 Special Meeting Workshops

22.4 Adjournment
This portion of the agenda is the same as it is for a regular meeting.

23. Citizens’ Rights
An Airport Commission meeting is a limited public forum. [78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 224 (1995); Kindt v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd. (9th Cir. 1995) 67 F.3d 266; White v. City of Norwalk, (9th Cir. 1990) 900 F.2d 1421; Leventhal v. Vista Unified School District (SD Cal. 1997) 973 F.Supp. 951]. Members of the public have the right to address the Airport Commission and to attend its meetings.

During the citizens’ open forum portion of a regular meeting agenda, members of the public have a right to address the Airport Commission on any item of interest to the public that is within the Airport Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Members of the public also have the right to address the Airport Commission before the Airport Commission considers or takes action on an item on any regular meeting agenda, except for items properly listed or considered in the Call to Order, Airport Commission Reports and Matters Initiated, and the Adjournment portions of the agenda. Members of the public shall be provided an opportunity to address the Airport Commission concerning any item that is described in the notice for special meeting workshops and special meetings. [54954.3].

The procedures for addressing public comments to the Airport Commission are as follows:

23.1 Addressing the Airport Commission
Members of the public that want to address the Airport Commission during citizens’ open forum or before the Airport Commission considers or takes action on an item must indicate their desire by personally submitting a request to speak to the staff liaison, or his or her designee, using the methods specified by the staff liaison in the agenda for that meeting. A member of the public may not submit a request to speak on behalf of any other person. The methods for addressing the Airport Commission will be described at each meeting. The staff liaison will prominently display the methods to address the Airport Commission in the William H. Mendenhall Community Room.

Before an item is considered by the Airport Commission, the staff liaison shall identify or provide a list of the speakers to the presiding officer in the order that they are received for each agenda item. Generally, once the Airport Commission ATTACHMENT 1
547

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 16
begins its consideration of an item, no additional requests to speak will be accepted absent invitation by the presiding officer.

The purpose of submitting a request to speak is to help the presiding officer conduct the Airport Commission’s meetings and to complete its business in an orderly fashion. The intent is not to limit testimony. Therefore, a member of the public will not be denied an opportunity to speak if a request to speak lacks information or because a speaker wants to remain anonymous.

Speakers who have not submitted a request to speak on time may be heard by the presiding officer’s recognition or by another Airport Commissioner’s successful appeal. [White v. City of Norwalk, (9th Cir. 1990) 900 F.2d 1421].

23.2 Speaker Time Limit
Each advisory body, with input from the City Clerk and consistent with the uniform format provided by the City Clerk, may establish their own rules to specify the method to request, and the speaker time limits, for citizens addressing the advisory body, but the advisory body must then administer them uniformly.

23.3 Members of the Public Addressing the Airport Commission

23.3.1 A list of people who have requested to speak shall be used to call each speaker to address the Airport Commission. When calling a speaker to the lectern the next two speakers will also be identified, so they are prepared to address the Airport Commission when called.

23.3.2 The Chairperson may request each speaker to state his or her name and city of residence before addressing the Airport Commission. A speaker is not required to provide his or her name or address to address the Airport Commission. However, to the extent such information is relevant to the issues being considered by the Airport Commission, the absence of such information may bear on the speaker’s credibility and the weight the Airport Commission affords the speaker’s comments.

23.3.3 Speakers shall address their comments only to the Airport Commission as a body and not to a particular member.

23.3.4 Members of the public may only address the Airport Commission from the lectern. No member of the public, other than the speaker at the lectern, may address the Airport Commission, unless called upon by the Chairperson.

23.3.5 No question shall be asked of Commission Members by a speaker, except through the Chairperson. No question shall be asked of a speaker by a Commission Member, except through the Chairperson. Commission Members, ATTACHMENT 1
548

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 17
the Chairperson, and the speaker are not obligated to answer any questions asked. The Chairperson may refer questions to staff for a brief answer while the speaker is at the lectern.

23.3.6 Speakers shall not use their time to unduly disrupt the orderly conduct of the Airport Commission’s meeting.

23.3.7 Speakers are encouraged to avoid repetition.

23.3.8 Speakers are encouraged to avoid making personal attacks.

23.3.9 Each speaker shall relinquish the lectern when his or her time to address the Airport Commission has expired.

23.3.10 A speaker may use his or her allotted time to read letters or other documents, play electronic recordings at a non-amplified volume, or otherwise present information to the Airport Commission in a non-disruptive manner, provided those activities are completed within the allotted time. The city will not provide the means for a speaker to play an electronic recording.

23.3.11 When called upon during citizens’ open forum, speakers may address the Airport Commission on any item of interest to the public within the Airport Commission’s subject matter jurisdiction. [54954.3(a)].

23.3.12 When called upon to provide public comment on a specific item of business on the agenda, speakers shall focus their comments on that specific item of business before the Airport Commission. [54954.3(a); White v. City of Norwalk, (9th Cir. 1990) 900 F.2d 1421; 78 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen 224 (1995)].

23.4 Participating Parties Addressing the Airport Commission Participating parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights when addressing the Airport Commission, except that the participating parties shall each have up to a maximum of 10 minutes to address the Airport Commission. The Chairperson may set and announce the time limit for each active participant to address the Airport Commission based upon the same criteria set forth in Section 23.2 Speaker Time Limit.

23.5 Public Criticism
Public criticism of the City’s policies, procedures, programs, or services, or of the acts or omissions of the Airport Commission, shall not be prohibited. However, the rights of each speaker to express his or her views is not absolute and nothing in these rules of procedure are intended to confer any privilege or protection for expression beyond that otherwise provided by law. [54954.3].

ATTACHMENT 1
549

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 18

23.6 Disruptive Speech and Conduct
Any person unduly disrupting an Airport Commission meeting may be requested by the Chairperson to leave the meeting. The Chairperson shall discourage demonstrations before the Airport Commission, such as applauding or booing.

Upon instructions by the Chairperson, a Sergeant-at-Arms may be called for the purpose of removing any person who, in the Chairperson’s judgment, has disrupted the meeting. [36813, 38638, 54954.3, 54957.9, Penal Code 403].

When possible, the Chairperson is encouraged to use alternative means, such as direction to speakers to avoid disruption or by taking a recess to review these rules with the speaker, to avoid disruptions to allow the Airport Commission to complete its business.

23.7 Written Communications – Post Hearing Notice, and Post Agenda Publication

23.7.1 Submitted after the hearing notice, but before the Agenda Publication.

Any member of the public may submit written comments and materials to the Airport Commission through the Airport Commission Liaison. All written comments and materials must be submitted between the date public hearing notices are published (10 days prior to the meeting) and noon on the day before agenda publication (3 days prior to the meeting). The Airport Commission Liaison shall deliver all written comments and materials received by 12:00 p.m. the day before agenda publication as part of the agenda packet for the posted agenda.

23.7.2 Submitted Post Agenda Publication.

Any member of the public may submit electronic comments to the Airport Commission using the electronic submission process the staff liaison specifies and makes available on the City’s website within the timeframe provided on the agenda. Any additional attachments can be submitted directly to the staff liaison.

All comments submitted using the staff liaison’s electronic process will be available to the public and the Airport Commission immediately upon submission.

The staff liaison shall post on the City’s website and deliver any additional materials received by 12:00 p.m. the day of the meeting to the Airport Commission in a supplemental packet prior to the meeting.

Physical copies of written comments and materials, and electronic and physical materials submitted to the Airport Office before 12:00 p.m. noon on the day of the Airport Commission meeting, will be included in the supplemental packet. After 12:00 p.m. noon on the day of the Airport Commission meeting, any member of the public that desires to submit materials to the Airport Commission for consideration at that meeting is hereby instructed to present 8 copies of the materials to the staff liaison for distribution to the Airport Commission at its meeting when the item is considered.

ATTACHMENT 1
550

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 19

23.7.3 Special Meetings and Workshops.

For special meetings and workshops, the staff liaison shall specify the instructions and timeframes for the public to submit comments and materials in the agenda for those meetings.

23.8 Approaching the Airport Commission
Once a meeting is called to order, no member of the public shall enter the area between the Commission and public seating without an invitation from the Chairperson. Members of the public may enter the area before and after the meeting, and during a recess, for the purpose of interacting with the individual Commission Members and City staff.

24. Airport Commission Deliberation
Airport Commission deliberations shall be orderly and guided by the Chairperson to reach a decision on the item before them or to provide the direction sought by staff.

25. Motions

25.1 Making a Motion
A motion may be made by the Chairperson or a Commission Member. Once a motion has been made, the Chairperson will solicit a second. A motion shall die unless it receives a second. If a motion receives a second, the Chairperson shall then invite debate and discussion on the motion and any amendments.

Any Commission Member who makes a motion may withdraw it during debate and discussion, even to the point of interrupting a speaker to do so. If the motion is withdrawn, the Chairperson may ask the person who seconded the motion if the Commission Member wishes to make the motion, subject to another Commission Member’s second.

25.2 Categories of Motions
There are four categories of motions that the Airport Commission may consider.

The first category is a basic motion, which is one that puts forward a decision for consideration. For example, a motion to approve City staff’s recommendation.

The second category is a motion to amend an earlier motion. Such an amending motion changes a basic motion under discussion in a minor way but does not supersede it. For example, adding a condition to a basic motion to approve staff’s recommendation. If the maker of the basic motion, and the ATTACHMENT 1
551

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 20
second, accept the amendment, then the amendment shall be incorporated into the original motion without the need for a second on the amending motion. If an amendment is not accepted into the basic motion by the moving Commission Members, the process for voting on simultaneous motions is then followed.

The third category is a substitute motion. Such a motion completely does away with the basic motion under discussion and puts a new motion before the Airport Commission. For example, if the basic motion is to approve staff’s recommendation, a substitute motion would propose numerous changes to staff’s recommendation or assembles multiple amending motions into a single motion. If a substitute motion is approved, the initial basic motion does not require action since it was substituted. If a substitute motion fails, the process for voting on simultaneous motions is then followed.

The fourth category is a hostile motion. A hostile motion is one that seeks to accomplish the opposite effect of the basic motion. For example, when a basic motion is to approve a project, a hostile motion is one to deny the project. If a hostile motion is made, the process for voting on simultaneous motions is then followed.

A decision whether a motion is one to amend or substitute is left to the Chairperson's sole discretion. A decision whether a motion is hostile is left to the Chairperson in consultation with the Commission’s Attorney.

25.3 Simultaneous Motions
The Airport Commission may consider up to three motions on the floor at one time. The Chairperson may reject a fourth motion until the three before the Airport Commission have been resolved. When two or three motions are before the Airport Commission, after motions and seconds, the first vote will be on the last motion made. Generally, the discussion when a motion is before the Airport Commission should focus on the last motion made. Once the vote on the last motion takes place, if necessary, discussion and decision on additional motions will take place in order.

However, a hostile motion shall not be on the floor at the same time as the motion it challenges. A hostile motion shall be considered after a vote on the basic motion and its amendments that it challenges.

25.4 Debatable and Non-debatable Motions
Debatable motions are subject to Commission Member comment and discussion before calling for a vote. Non-debatable motions are not subject to Commission Member comment and discussion and are to be voted on immediately.

25.4.1 Debatable Motions
ATTACHMENT 1
552

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 21
Debatable motions are motions to take action on agenda items and other items of City business. For the purpose of these rules of procedure, all motions are debatable except those expressly identified in subsection 25.4.2. Debate on a motion should continue as long as Commission Members wish to discuss an item, subject to the Chairperson’s decision that it is time to move on and take action.

25.4.2 Non-Debatable Motions
Non-debatable motions are procedural and terminating motions. Certain motions once made immediately stop the Commission’s deliberations and, upon receipt of a second, should be voted on immediately. The Commission’s non-debatable motions are as follows:
a. Motion to Adjourn. If passed, a motion to adjourn requires the Airport Commission to immediately adjourn to its next regularly scheduled meeting. b. Motion to Recess. If passed, a motion to recess requires the Airport Commission to immediately take a recess, the length of which the Chairperson will determine. The Chairperson may order a recess without a motion, and without adjourning the meeting, as the Chairperson determines necessary to maintain decorum and conduct the meeting in an orderly fashion.

c. Motion to Fix the Time to Adjourn. If passed, a motion to fix the time to adjourn the meeting requires the Airport Commission to adjourn at a specific time set in the motion.
d. Motion to Table an Item. If passed, a motion to table an item postpones an item indefinitely or to a date and time certain, set in the motion. If the motion does not contain a specific time, an additional motion is required to bring the item back to the Airport Commission at a future meeting. e. Motion to Continue an Item. A motion to continue an item has the same effect as a motion to table but is generally used when good cause exists or in response to a request by staff, a Commission Member, or a participating party, as set forth in Section 17 Continuance of Agenda Items, or a scheduling problem arises. If passed, the motion continues the item indefinitely or to the date and time set in the motion. If the motion does not contain a specific time, an additional motion is required to bring the item back to the Airport Commission at a future meeting.
f. Motion to Call the Question. A motion to call the question, also known as moving the previous question or limiting debate, stops further Airport Commission deliberation, debate, and discussion on an item. It can be stated ATTACHMENT 1
553

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 22
as stopping debate or discussion within a certain period of time, such as 15 minutes. If seconded, the Chairperson shall then call for a vote on the motion or motions pending before the Airport as provided for in Section 10(g) Motion to Be Stated.

25.5 Miscellaneous Motions and Appeals

25.5.1 Motion to Reconsider
A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Airport Commission may be made as follows: (1) The motion must be made by a Commission Member that voted along with majority that voted for the original motion that passed, although the motion for reconsideration may be seconded by any Commission Member; (2) The motion must be made either at the meeting at which the action to be reconsidered was taken, or, at the next regular meeting, provided appropriate due process is afforded to any participating parties; (3) The motion is debatable; and (4) If any participating party has left the meeting, or if the motion comes at a subsequent meeting, the ultimate decision to be reconsidered must take place at a subsequent meeting.

25.5.2 Commission Member Appeal
Any Commission Member may appeal any ruling by the Chairperson. If a Commission Member so moves and the motion is seconded, after debate, the ruling of the Chairperson may be reversed by majority vote. If an appeal is taken, the question shall be, “Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?”

26. Action and Direction

26.1 Votes, General Rules
Unless otherwise provided, the Airport Commission’s actions must be passed pursuant to a majority vote on a motion, and the motion may not be considered unless it is seconded. A simple majority vote by those Commission Members present is necessary to pass a motion providing direction to staff or establishing administrative policy.

Any Commission Member may, before the “Nays” are called for, demand that a roll call vote be taken on the motion before the Commission. The Chairperson’s name shall be called last with other Commission Members’ names called in alphabetical order by the staff liaison. Commission Members shall not give explanations for their vote during roll call.

If a motion does not receive the necessary majority vote for passage, the Chairperson may solicit additional discussion and another motion for further deliberation and voting. If further discussion and deliberation does not result in a ATTACHMENT 1
554

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 23
motion receiving a majority vote necessary to pass a motion, the Chairperson may declare that “no action has been taken” and proceed with the remainder of the agenda. In the event of a tie vote, the procedures in section 26.2 Tie Votes, shall control.

If a Commission Member is present at the meeting but abstains from voting on a motion or is silent during the vote on the motion, then the rules in section 26.3 Abstentions and Silence shall govern how the Commission Member’s silence or abstention is tabulated.

26.2 Tie Votes
Generally, a motion fails if there is a tie vote. After a tie vote, the Chairperson may solicit additional discussion and another motion in an attempt to break the tie. If the tie vote occurs during a Commission Member absence, and the absent Commission Member does not have a conflict of interest related to the item being voted on, the Airport Commission may continue the item to a subsequent meeting when the absent Commission Member is expected to be present in an effort to resolve the tie. If the tie vote is not resolved, the motion shall fail, and the Chairperson may declare that “no action has been taken” and proceed with the remainder of the agenda. However, if a decision is legally compelled under state law (such as the Permit Streamlining Act), the tie vote shall constitute a denial of the application, project before the Airport Commission and an appeal could be submitted for final decision by the City Council.

26.3 Abstentions and Silence
The City Council discourages abstentions since abstentions without legal conflict may impede the Airport Commission’s actions, for example by causing a tie vote.

Abstentions also deprive Livermore residents of one vote of five and may diminish accountability of Commission Members on items of legitimate concern.

At the same time, it is not the City Council’s intention to impede any individual Commission Member’s right to choose not to speak or vote on an item.

If any Commission Member wishes to abstain from voting on a motion, the Commission Member must announce the abstention when the item of business is first called for consideration and must not participate in the consideration of the item, in which case the minutes will reflect that the Commission Member abstained from the vote.

If the Commission Member does not announce an abstention when the item of business is first called for consideration, or the Commission Member participates in the consideration of the item, and the Commission Member’s abstains during the vote, then that Commission Member’s vote shall be tabulated in favor of the motion.

ATTACHMENT 1
555

AIRPORT COMMISSION
APRIL 2022 24
Silence of any Commission Member shall be tabulated along with the majority of the votes cast by the Commission Members present and voting on the motion since the silent Commission Member is conceding to the majority’s wishes.

This rule is intended to expressly modify Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Revised 2011 for counting votes with regard to abstentions and silence by a Commission Member.

26.4 Protests
Any Commission Member shall have the right to enter into public record reasons for dissent or protests against any motion carried by the majority.

27. Appeals
A person found in violation of the rules and regulations contained in Chapter

11.08.190 of the Livermore Municipal Code, Airport Rules and Regulations, or any order or directive of the airport manager related thereto, including a 30-day notice of termination of tenancy, may appeal such finding, order or directive by submitting a written request for appeal to the Airport Commission. A three-day notice to pay rent, cure default or quit is final and not subject to appeal.

ATTACHMENT 1
556

CITY OF LIVERMORE

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE

RULES OF PROCEDURE
Prepared by the City Clerk’s Office
April 2022 December 2023 DRAFT
ATTACHMENT 2
557

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 1

CITY OF LIVERMORE

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE

RULES OF PROCEDURE

RECOMMENDED TO BE SUNSET

1. Duties and Responsibilities – The Beautification Committee shall have the following duties and responsibilities:

A. Designate and plan specific sites and extended areas, primarily under governmental ownership or control, for the beautification of major roadway systems, median islands, and entranceways throughout the city.

B. Review the designs for establishment of small parks or rest areas at street intersections.

C. In cooperation with the City Neighborhood Preservation Division, analyze and recommend property rehabilitation of singular or group areas under private ownership within the City.

D. Recommend revisions of the street tree ordinance, specifying tree types, installation standards, spacing dimensions, and other related matters for the implantation of decorative trees in all areas to be developed within the city in both residential and commercial areas.

E. Recommend an annual program by the city for the placement of street trees in all areas deficient in such improvements.

F. Recommend landscaping standards for publicly controlled landscaping associated with commercial and industrial development.

G. Recommend replacement landscaping, planting and maintenance standards for all of the landscape maintenance districts within the City of Livermore.

H. Review and comment upon proposals for the installation of street furnishing and accessories, lights, ornamental fixtures, monuments, fountains, or other forms of furnishing of an aesthetic nature as to location, design, and cost.

ATTACHMENT 2
558

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 2
I. Analyze and recommend the application for and utilization of programs wherein financial grants or personal services may be applicable and available to support the beautification effort of the City.

J. As requested by Council, propose, and recommend a master plan for Livermore beautification with detailed standards for aspects of city beautification.

K. Organize, publicize, and participate in annual city-wide activities and events, such as Earth Day, Make A Difference Day, and Arbor Day, and present beautification awards to enhance city aesthetics.

L. Support the goals and priorities 5-Year Strategic Plan adopted by the City Council.

M. Create an annual workplan at the first meeting in January.

2. Members – The Beautification Committee shall consist of 7 members, all of whom must be residents of the City of Livermore.

3. Term limits – Beautification Committee members shall serve no more than two consecutive four-year terms or a total of eight years unless the member was selected to complete an unexpired term or unless otherwise noted. However, members may be appointed back to the Beautification Committee after a break in service of two years.

Time served in an unexpired term shall not count against the eight-year maximum limit. Committee members who have already completed eight years of service or other specified maximum terms are not eligible for appointment to an unexpired term.

4. Attendance Policy – Beautification Committee members may miss four meetings per calendar year. A member who misses more than four meetings per year may be subject to removal from the Committee. The staff liaison will document all absences and report to the City Clerk when a member of the Committee has exceeded the allowed number of absences. The City Clerk will notify the City Council with a memo explaining the circumstances of the absences and the City Council will determine if an agenda item is needed to consider whether removal from the Committee is appropriate. The member will have the opportunity to speak at a City Council meeting when removal is under consideration. The final decision to remove a member from the Committee rests solely with the City Council.

5. Elections and Officers – The Beautification Committee shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson at the first meeting held after January 1st of each year.

ATTACHMENT 2
559

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 3
Election of the officers shall be by majority vote of the Committee. The role of the officers shall be as follows:
a. Chairperson – The Chairperson shall preside at all regular meetings and may call special meetings. The Chairperson shall decide upon all points of order and procedure during the meeting.
b. Vice Chairperson - The Vice Chairperson shall assume all duties of the Chairperson in the absence or disability of the Chairperson. c. Presiding Officer – In the absence of the Chairperson or Vice Chairperson, the members present shall select a Presiding Officer.

6. Meetings – The Beautification Committee shall meet on the first Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m. at the William H. Mendenhall Community Room at 1016 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA. Meetings shall begin promptly as noticed pursuant to this provision. The Committee shall adopt an annual meeting calendar listing all regular meetings for the calendar year. The calendar shall be published on the City's website. All meetings shall be open to the public. The Committee may not meet in closed session. Committee members may not participate in a meeting remotely, via teleconference or videoconference.

7. Agenda Preparation and Posting – The staff liaison shall post the notices and agendas for each Beautification Committee meeting in the kiosk in front of the Civic Center Meeting Hall, the Civic Center Library, and on the City’s website. a. Regular Meetings
Agendas shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Brown Act and shall be posted in a location that is freely accessible to members of the public at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the meeting and contain a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. [54954.2] b. Special Meetings and Workshops
Notice of the call for a special meeting must be delivered and received by each Committee Member and the media at least 24 hours before the special meeting and must be posted at least 24 hours before the special meeting date. The agenda shall specify the time and location of the meeting, contain a brief description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting, and state who called the special meeting. [54956].

8. Minutes – An account of all proceedings of the Beautification Committee shall be prepared by the staff liaison and approved by the Committee. The staff liaison with input from the City Clerk, and consistent with the uniform format provided by ATTACHMENT 2
560

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 4
the City Clerk, shall determine the preferred software/recording device used to capture the minutes for their advisory body meetings. Minutes shall be provided for Committee consideration and approval as action minutes.

9. Quorum – Four members constitute a quorum of the Beautification Committee. A quorum of the members must be present to conduct any business. In the absence of a quorum at a meeting, the meeting must be adjourned. The matters listed on the agenda shall be taken up at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Committee or scheduled for a special meeting if deemed necessary. A meeting may also be declared adjourned in advance, if absence notifications received by staff create a lack of a quorum. Cancellations of meetings must comply with the requirements of the Brown Act.

10. Conduct at Meetings
a. All meetings shall be held in accordance with City policies and the Brown Act Open Meeting Laws (Government Code, Sections 54950 and following). Only items listed on the agenda may be considered by the Committee.
b. General Conduct of Meetings – Points of order shall be settled by the Chairperson. Points of order shall comply with the Brown Act, Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Revised 2011, Beautification Committee Rules of Procedure and City policies. The Chairperson will consult with staff as necessary. Unresolved issues shall be referred to the City Attorney and continued to a future meeting. Any member desiring to speak must first be recognized by the Chairperson and shall confine any remarks to the subject under consideration.
c. Voting on Items – Voting on items shall be in accordance with Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, Revised 2011 and Parliamentary Procedures. The Beautification Committee shall not take a sealed ballot vote in open session.
d. Call to Order - The Chairperson shall call the meeting to order at the appointed time. If both the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson are absent, then the staff liaison shall call the meeting to order and the Committee Members present shall then select a presiding officer for that meeting.
e. Preservation of Order - The Chairperson shall preserve strict order and decorum, and shall discourage personal, verbal attacks on Committee Members, staff, and/or citizens, but shall not prohibit criticisms of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the City, or of the acts or omissions of the Beautification Committee or members of the City staff. The ATTACHMENT 2
561

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 5
Chairperson shallconfine debate to the item under discussion. [36813, 38638, 54954.3, 54957.9].

f. Reordering of Agenda - The Chairperson may reorder the items on the agenda for a noticed meeting to accommodate members of the public who wish to speak on an agenda item that would otherwise be considered by the Beautification Committee later in the meeting. The Chairperson shall announce the reorder prior to calling members of the public to speak during citizens open forum.
g. Motion to be Stated - The Chairperson shall state all motions submitted for a vote by the Beautification Committee and announce the result of the vote and identify the no votes and any Committee Members that abstained or recused themselves from the vote. No action shall be taken by secret ballot, but electronic tabulation may be used to record and report roll call votes. [54953(b)(2) and (c)(2)].

11. Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments
Every agenda shall provide the opportunity for members of the public to address the Beautification Committee on subjects which are not listed on the agenda and are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Committee. The Chairperson may establish time limits per individual speaker. The Committee shall not discuss nor take action on subjects raised under Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments; but the Chairperson, with the concurrence of a majority of the Committee, may direct staff to place subjects raised under Citizens’ Open Forum/Public Comments on a future Committee agenda.

12. Subcommittees
The Beautification Committee may create standing subcommittees (those with ongoing subject-matter jurisdiction and regularly scheduled meetings). Such subcommittees shall be subject to all City policies and the requirements of the Brown Act.

13. Staff Support
The head of the department that is responsible for supporting the Beautification Committee shall designate one or more employees to serve as staff liaison to the Committee. The Staff Liaison shall prepare and post the agenda, take and maintain meeting minutes, prepare other documents as directed by the Chairperson in accordance with City Council Goals and Priorities or in accordance with direction from the City Manager or City Manager’s designee, and generally assist the Committee in performing its duties. The Staff Liaison shall have no voting authority.

ATTACHMENT 2
562

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 6
Committee Members must work with their assigned staff liaison and the liaison’s Department Head to obtain the City Council’s approval before beginning any self-initiated project that will require more than 8 hours of staff time to complete that year. However, the Commission may pursue self-initiated projects that can be accomplished utilizing the city resources currently allocated to the particular advisory body and that do not take resources away from that advisory body’s anticipated work to fulfill its duties and responsibilities to the City Council.

15. Types of Meetings

15.1 Regular Meetings
The Beautification Committee shall meet in the William H. Mendenhall Community Room for all regular Committee meetings. The regular meetings shall begin on the first Wednesday of each month at 6:00 p.m., unless otherwise specified by posted notice. If the meeting date falls on a legal holiday, the Beautification Committee shall meet at a date and time designated by the Committee.

15.2 Special Meetings
Special meetings may be called by the Committee Chair, the Committee liaison or by a majority of Committee Members. The call and notice for a special meeting must specify the items to be considered and the date, time, and location for the meeting. [36807, 54956(a)].

The Beautification Committee may take final action at a special meeting that is not a workshop.

15.3 Special Meeting Workshops
The Beautification Committee may meet informally in special meetings designated as workshops that are called by the Chairperson, the Committee liaison, or by a majority of Committee Members. Workshops are special meetings intended for training purposes such as ethics training, sexual harassment prevention and education, and specific technical subjects.

ATTACHMENT 2
563

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 7
Workshops are open to the public and are meetings for purposes of the Brown Act. The Beautification Committee may provide direction, but unlike other special meetings the Beautification Committee may not take a final action at a workshop. [54956].

15.4 Adjourned Meetings, and Adjourned Regular Meetings Any meeting of the Beautification Committee may be adjourned to a later date, time, and location, and the notice of adjournment shall be posted within 24 hours on or near the door of the place where the adjourned meeting was held.

However, if the adjourned meeting is to reconvene less than 24 hours after adjournment, then a copy of the order or notice of the continuance shall be posted immediately following the meeting. [36809, 54955].

The Chairperson, Committee liaison, or majority of Committee Members may call for an adjourned regular meeting in consultation with the City Attorney to conduct a regular meeting on a date other than on a regular meeting date on the Beautification Committee’s annual calendar. [54955]
16 Actions Limited to Posted Agendas
The Beautification Committees shall not discuss or take action on any item not appearing on the posted notice or agenda for that meeting. However, as permitted by the Brown Act, Committee Members and staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by the Beautification Committee or by members of the public addressing the Beautification Committee. Committee Members may ask a question of City staff or a speaker for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their own activities.

17. Continuance of Agenda Items
Items listed on a posted agenda should not be continued or postponed absent good cause.

17.2 Good Cause to Continue During Consideration
Once an item has been taken up for consideration, City staff, a Committee Member, or a participating party as defined in Section 21.4.4 Participating Parties ATTACHMENT 2
564

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 8
may request a continuance of the item. The item may only be continued following a majority vote of the Committee Members present.

17.3 Public Comment for a Continued Item
If the opportunity for the public to address the Beautification Committee has concluded and the item was returned to the Beautification Committee for deliberation before it was continued, then the opportunity for public comment on the item will not be reopened absent a motion by the Beautification Committee. [54955].
18 Consideration of items after 11:00 p.m.

18.1 Canvass and Reorder
At 10:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as practical, the Chairperson shall canvass staff and Committee Members present to identify the remaining agenda items for consideration. The Chairperson will then identify what items will be considered or continued, and in what order. Once the Chairperson outlines the balance of the agenda, it may not be amended absent an appeal by a Committee Member.

18.2 No New Items Considered after 11:00 p.m.

Generally, the Beautification Committee will not begin consideration of any items on an agenda after 11:00 p.m., but may complete their consideration of an item that was commenced prior to 11:00 p.m.

18.3 Exceptions
The Beautification Committee may commence consideration of an item after 11:00 under the following circumstances:
a. An item is subject to a legal deadline, or,

b. The Beautification Committee votes to allow consideration of the item after 11:00 p.m.

19. Points of Order, Privilege, and Personal Privilege
A Committee Member may ask for a point of order, at which time the Chairperson will ask for an explanation. Appropriate points of order relate to matters that a Committee Member considers inappropriate conduct for the meeting, such as the failure to observe these Rules of Procedure or the rules of parliamentary procedure.

ATTACHMENT 2
565

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 9
A Committee Member may seek a point of privilege. If so, the Chairperson shall ask for an explanation of the Committee Member’s point. Points of privilege generally relate to matters that interfere with a normal flow or comfort of the Beautification Committee’s meeting, such as the inability to hear testimony because of disruption.

A Committee Member may ask for a point of personal privilege when the integrity, character, or motives of the Committee Member are called into question by a speaker; or where the welfare of the Beautification Committee is concerned.

If a speaker is interrupted by a point of order, privilege, or personal privilege, the remainder of a speaker’s time will be preserved by the staff liaison until the point is resolved.

20. Minutes - An account of all final actions or recommendations of the Beautification Committee shall be prepared by the staff liaison and approved by the Committee.

The staff liaison with input from the City Clerk, and consistent with the uniform format provided by the City Clerk, shall determine the preferred software/recording device used to capture the minutes for their advisory body meetings. Minutes shall be provided for Committee consideration and approval as action minutes.

20.1 Approval
The minutes for a Beautification Committee meeting shall be reviewed and approved as set forth in this section.
a. The Beautification Committee shall approve minutes for a regular meeting, special meeting, and special meeting workshops.
b. A Beautification Committee Member may not approve the minutes for any meeting that the Committee Member did not attend.

Also, Beautification Committee Members may not approve the minutes for a meeting that they were not eligible to attend as a Committee Member. c. If no Committee Members are eligible to approve the minutes for a Beautification Committee meeting, then the staff liaison shall attest to the accuracy of the meeting minutes and enter them into official minute books.

20.2 Preferred Method of Recordation and Minutes
Beautification Committee liaisons shall take an audio recording of each meeting and keep them in accordance with the City’s Records Retention Schedule.

Minutes of Beautification Committee meetings shall be action minutes that ATTACHMENT 2
566

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 10
capture the action taken by the Beautification Committee and the outcome of each agenda item.

20.3 Staff Attendance & Development of Agenda - Staff attendance and agenda development will be determined by the staff liaison for the advisory body.

21. Order of Business – Regular Meetings
The usual order of business for regular meetings shall be as follows:

21.1. Call to Order
This portion of the agenda is for roll call and the pledge of allegiance.

21.2. Citizens’ Open Forum
This portion of the agenda is for any member of the public to address the Beautification Committee on any item of interest to the public that is within the Beautification Committee’s subject matter jurisdiction. However, to prepare and preserve a proper administrative record, public comments concerning an item listed elsewhere on the agenda should be reserved and addressed to the Beautification Committee when that item is called for consideration.

Citizens’ Open forum shall be limited to 30 minutes, usually before the consent calendar. If there are additional members of the public who wish to speak at the conclusion of the 30-minute time period, then the Chair shall reconvene the citizens open forum at the conclusion of the matters for consideration portion of the agenda unless the Chair announces that citizens open forum is reordered to a different place on the agenda.

The procedures for public comments during the citizens open forum are set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

21.3. Consent Calendar
The consent calendar portion of the agenda is for routine items that are not expected to require Beautification Committee discussion. Examples of items for the consent calendar include the approval of minutes. Any Beautification Committee Member may pull an item for separate discussion. Members of the public may address the Beautification Committee on consent calendar items by following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

The items on the consent calendar are generally approved by the Beautification Committee by a single motion, but separate motions may be appropriate to accommodate a conflict of interest, an absence, or other Committee Member interests.

ATTACHMENT 2
567

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 11

21.4. Matters for Consideration
This portion of the agenda is for items of business that require Beautification Committee action, direction, or receipt of reports that do not also require a public hearing. The procedures for this portion of the agenda follow the following procedure:

21.4.2 Staff Presentation
A member of City staff will then:
a. Introduce themselves and the item by identifying the report and other written material included in the agenda packet for the Beautification Committee’s consideration, as well as any written comments received from the public. b. Identify any supplemental written materials that have been provided to the Beautification Committee for consideration, which were received or prepared for the item after the meeting agenda was published.
c. Identify any other staff members or consultants that will be part of the staff presentation or are otherwise present and available for the Beautification Committee’s questions.
d. State whether the applicant is present and whether the applicant intends to make a presentation to the Beautification Committee. e. Make an oral report, unless waived by the Committee.

21.4.3 Beautification Committee Questions or Comments
Following the staff presentation, the Committee Members may ask questions of City staff and consultants or make comments on the item.

21.4.4 Participating Parties
Following Committee Member questions and comments after the staff presentation, the applicant, appellant, and other named participant in the item that is party to an agenda item (collectively “participating parties”) may address the Committee. After the Chair determines that no other participating parties wish ATTACHMENT 2
568

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 12
to address the Beautification Committee on the item, the Chairperson will then invite Committee Member questions or comments of the participating parties and staff concerning the item. Participating parties shall address the Beautification Committee following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

21.4.5 Opportunity for Public Comment
The purpose of the public hearing is to provide members of the public with an opportunity to address the Beautification Committee concerning the item, as well as to express their support or opposition of the item. The Chairperson will formally announce the opening of the public comment period and invite members of the public to address the Beautification Committee on the item. Public speakers shall address the Beautification Committee following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

After the Chairperson determines that no other member of the public wishes to address the Beautification Committee on the hearing item, the Chairperson will formally close the public comment period and return the item to the Beautification Committee for deliberation.

21.4.6 Deliberation
Once an item of business returns to the Beautification Committee for deliberation, the Chairperson will invite the Committee Members to discuss the item to develop concurrence for a motion. Committee Members may ask questions of staff and the participating parties as part of their deliberations.

21.4.7. Beautification Committee Action
After Beautification Committee deliberation, the Chairperson shall call for a motion and a second as set forth in Section 25 Motions, and the Beautification Committee may make such motions as set forth in that section.

If the motion seconded for consideration is substantially different than the recommended action in the published staff report, the Chairperson may invite public comments on the motion. Each speaker will be limited to one minute to comment on the motion; and the Beautification Committee has discretion to decide not to hear further comment if they choose. Public speakers shall address the Beautification Committee following the procedures set forth in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights.

Prior to deliberating on matters for consideration, the Beautification Committee shall receive public comment as provided for in Section 23 Citizens’ Rights. After receiving public comment, the Beautification Committee shall deliberate and shall receive the report, take action, or provide direction as set forth in Section 25 Motions.

ATTACHMENT 2
569

BEAUTIFICATION COMMITTEE
April 2022 13

21.5 Reports and Matters Initiated
This portion of the agenda is for:
a. Each member of the Beautification Committee to provide brief reports on any conferences, training, community meetings, or other events of interest to the community that the Committee Member attended at the City’s expense [53232.2(d)].
b. The city staff to provide information of community interest to the Beautification Committee and to seek direction from the Beautification Committee concerning items to be included on future agendas.
c. The Beautification Committee to provide guidance and direction to staff concerning items to be included on future agendas and information to be provided in response to questions raised during citizens open forum. d. The Beautification Committee to request staff to provide information, perform studies, or undertake other administrative functions or to develop information for Committee action at a future meeting. If the requested action cannot be accomplished within the approved budget or if it will involve substantial staff resources, approval of resources would need to be provided from the City Council prior to staff completing the work.

Members of the public do not have the right to address the Beautification Committee during this portion of the agenda. [54954.3(a); Coalition of Labor, Agriculture & Business v. County of Santa Barbara Bd. of Supervisors, (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 205].

21.6 Adjournment
This portion of the agenda is for the Chairperson to adjourn the Beautification Committee meeting to its next meeting. The meeting may be adjourned to a regular meeting, special meeting, special meeting workshop, adjourned regular meeting, or adjourned special meeting.

Livermore City CouncilDecember 11, 2023

Livermore City Council
December 11, 2023