Agenda packet — Livermore City Council, September 9, 2024 (part 4 of 4)

May 2024
A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
The purpose of this Addendum is to demonstrate that further environmental review is not required given that the proposed modifications to the approved project would not trigger the applicable criteria set forth in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

The City of Livermore, Community Development Department, has reviewed the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project (proposed project) and on the basis of the whole record before it, has determined that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the original CEQA document was adopted (in this case, the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration [IS/MND], as amended by the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project Addendum), and there is no new available information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time that the original CEQA document was adopted. The proposed project, as identified in this Addendum, would not have a significant effect on the environment beyond that which was evaluated in the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan IS/MND (2007 IS/MND) or the approved and entitled 2017 residential project. Therefore, the proposed project would not trigger the applicable criteria set forth in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

This Addendum to the 2007 IS/MND, as amended by the 2017 Addendum, has been prepared pursuant to Title 14, Section 15164 of the California Code of Regulations and City of Livermore environmental standards.

B. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND LOCATION
The approximately 28-acre Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Project site is located southeast of the intersection of Las Positas Road and Arroyo Vista in the City of Livermore, California, and is bisected by the Arroyo Seco Channel (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). Surrounding existing land uses include light industrial and commercial uses to the north; undeveloped land and a modular building manufacturer to the east, across Bennett Drive; commercial uses to the west, across Las Positas Road; and light industrial and commercial uses to the south, across Las Positas Road.

The 2007 IS/MND, adopted by City Council in 2007, analyzed two conceptual plans for future development of the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan, a residential community, on the site. Plan A (see Figure 3) assumed development of a residential community with 402 residential units consisting of 87 single-family homes and 315 townhomes, and 8.5 acres of open space. Plan B (see Figure 4) assumed development of up to 495 residential units consisting of 170 multi-family residences and 325 townhomes, and 9.3 acres of open space. In addition, the project included a multi-use trail along the west side of the Arroyo Seco Channel and a pedestrian bridge over the channel to connect the western and eastern neighborhoods. The project required approval of a Rezone of the site from Planned Unit Development to Planned Development Residential, a Tentative Map, a Development Agreement, and Site Plan Design Review.

The 2017 Addendum was adopted by City Council in June 2017, along with a land use entitlement package submitted by a homebuilder that refined the original project to focus solely on one site plan. The site plan that was approved in 2017 is shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. The refined project – approved with a tentative tract map, site plan design review, planned development, and development agreement – included a total of 435 dwelling units, including a mix of 86 singlefamily detached houses, 249 detached townhomes, and 100 multi-family condominiums. Of the total 435 dwelling units, 195 units would be located on the western portion of the site and 240 units would be located on the eastern portion of the site.

EXHIBIT D
635
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 3 ends

May 2024
Figure 1
Regional Vicinity Map

EXHIBIT D
636
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 4 ends

May 2024
Figure 2
Project Site Boundaries

EXHIBIT D
637
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 5 ends

May 2024
Figure 3
Conceptual Land Use Plan A

EXHIBIT D
638
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 6 ends

May 2024
Figure 4
Conceptual Land Use Plan B

EXHIBIT D
639
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 7 ends

May 2024
Figure 5
2017 Approved Site Plan West

EXHIBIT D
640
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 8 ends

May 2024
Figure 6
2017 Approved Site Plan East

EXHIBIT D
641
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 9 ends

May 2024
The single-family detached houses would be two-story and have a maximum height of 30 feet, and the townhomes and condominiums would be three-story and have a maximum height of 45 feet.

In addition, the 2017 approved project included a 0.5-acre neighborhood park on the western portion of the site with a play area, pergola, picnic tables, community building, outdoor kitchen, outdoor fireplace, seating, and pool area. The eastern portion of the site included an approximately 0.2-acre neighborhood park with a community garden, barbeque area, and play area. Similar to the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan land use concept, the 2017 approved project included a multi-use trail on the west side of the Seco Arroyo Channel and an eight-foot-wide pedestrian bridge across the Arroyo Seco Channel, which would connect the western and eastern neighborhoods.

C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The current proposed project would involve minimal modifications to the approved 2017 residential project and IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Specifically, the proposed project would include the addition of a third story to the 86 single-family detached residences on the western portion of the site that were originally proposed as two-story buildings, and the elimination of the pedestrian bridge component. The addition of a third story to the 86 single-family detached residences on the western portion of the site (see Figure 7) would accommodate the square footage and bedroom needs of the current market. The proposed modification would increase the maximum allowed height of the single-family detached residences from 30 feet to 45 feet. The revisions would be to the architecture only, with special care to match previous design styles and corner enhancements visible from the public realm. The number of lots and streets would remain within substantial conformance to previous approvals.

As shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6, the pedestrian bridge was designed to connect the western and eastern neighborhoods by crossing the Arroyo Seco Channel, which is owned and maintained by Zone 7 Water Agency. However, an aerial easement could not be obtained, which would allow for construction, access, and maintenance of the pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Seco Channel. Thus, the proposed project would eliminate the pedestrian bridge component from the previously approved project, and the original bridge landing areas would be improved as pocket parks to serve as additional outdoor amenity spaces, including dining and barbeque areas (see Figure 8).

The City of Livermore General Plan designates the site as Light Intensity Industrial (LII)/Urban High Residential, 14 to 18 dwelling units per acre (UH-3), and the site is zoned Planned Development Residential (PDR-16-004). The proposed project would not involve any changes to the land use designations for the site. However, revisions to the PDR-16-004 design standards and Site Plan Design Review would be required to allow for the proposed three-story single-family detached residences and elimination of the pedestrian bridge component. In addition, amendments to the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan, Development Agreement, Site Plan Design Review, and Conditions of Approval would be required for the elimination of the pedestrian bridge.

D. RATIONALE FOR PREPARATION OF THE ADDENDUM
In determining whether an addendum is the appropriate document to analyze the modifications to the project and its approval, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 (Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration) states:

EXHIBIT D
642
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 10 ends

May 2024
Figure 7
Single-Family Detached Houses

EXHIBIT D
643
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 11 ends

May 2024
Figure 8
Proposed Pocket Park Improvements

EXHIBIT D
644
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 12 ends

May 2024
(a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.
(c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. (d) The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to making a decision on the project. (e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.

New significant effects or other grounds require preparation of a subsequent EIR in support of further agency action on a project pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163. Under the guidelines, a subsequent or supplemental EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration shall be prepared if any of the following criteria are met:
(a) When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more

EXHIBIT D
645
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 13 ends

May 2024
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

E. USE OF A PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:

The California Supreme Court has held that a lead agency has the responsibility of initially deciding whether an original environmental document retains “some relevance” to the ongoing decision-making process. The City of Livermore has determined that the 2007 IS/MND as amended in 2017 for the approved project is relevant and has prepared an addendum to that document to evaluate the proposed project.

Based on the above, in accordance with Sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project would not require major revisions to the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, if the proposed project would not involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The analysis that follows concludes that none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163 apply to the proposed project. Thus, preparation of an addendum would provide the appropriate level of environmental review.

In cases where an approved project has already undergone environmental review, and the environmental document has been certified by the lead agency, the lead agency can restrict its review to the incremental effects of the modified project, rather than having to reconsider the overall impacts of the project. In other words, if the project under review constitutes a modification of a previously approved project subjected to environmental review, then the “baseline” for purposes of CEQA is adjusted such that the originally approved project is assumed to exist.1 F. DISCUSSION
The following sections provide discussions of any potential impacts associated with the proposed project beyond those previously identified in the 2007 IS/MND as amended in 2017. Given the limited scope of changes that would occur as a result of the proposed project in comparison to the 2017 approved project, this Addendum provides a detailed evaluation of select CEQA topics potentially affected by the changes, including Aesthetics, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy, Noise, Transportation, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Public Services, Utilities, and Hydrology and Water Quality. The remaining CEQA topics are appropriately discussed at a lesser level of detail.

Aesthetics
The proposed project would modify the previously approved 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017 by adding a third story to the 86 single-family detached residences on the western portion of the site that were originally proposed as two-story buildings. As a result, the 86 detached residences would more closely match the design of the three-story, attached residences proposed on the eastern and western portions of the project site. The additional story would increase the maximum 1 See Michael H. Remy et al. Guide to CEQA, 11th Edition. Point Arena: Solano Press Books (2007), p. 207; Stephen L. Kostka and Michael H. Zischke. Practice Under the Environmental Quality Act, Second Edition (Vol. 1). Oakland:

Continuing Education of the Bar (2018), p. 12-32; Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1st Dist. 1991) 226 Cal. App. 3d 1467.

EXHIBIT D
646
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 14 ends

May 2024
building height for the single-family residences located on the western portion of the project site from 30 feet to 45 feet. The revisions are to the architecture only, with special care to match previous design styles and corner enhancements visible from the public realm. The proposed project would be subject to the same rules governing aesthetics and glare. Furthermore, the previous IS/MND, as amended in 2017, concluded that scenic vistas are not visible from the site or surrounding properties, and, due to the area surrounding the project site being heavily developed, a less-than-significant impact would occur from the proposed project buildout. The visual character of the proposed project would be consistent with what was intended for the site within the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Accordingly, any impacts associated with aesthetics as a result of the proposed project would remain the same as what was previously identified in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, which concluded mitigation measures were not needed. Thus, based on the above, the proposed project would not result in any changes, new circumstances, or new information that would involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts related to aesthetics from what has been anticipated for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017.

Air Quality, Energy, and Noise
Because the proposed project would not involve any changes to the anticipated land uses associated with the site and would result in the same area of disturbance and number of units, the same level of air pollutant emissions, energy usage, and noise associated with both construction and operation of the proposed project would occur as what has already been anticipated for the project site and analyzed in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. In addition, statewide standards related to air quality and energy consumption have progressively become more stringent over time, such as the 2022 California Building Standards Code (CBSC), including the 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Code, and the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). Such standards, as well as technological innovations, would ensure that as cumulative development occurs under the increasingly stringent regulations, air pollutant emissions and energy use associated with such cumulative development is anticipated to be reduced over time. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable standards and regulations associated with air quality and energy, including the most recent version of the CALGreen Code and California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Code. The applicable CEQA thresholds of significance have not changed related to air quality, energy, and noise since the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, were prepared. Therefore, impacts associated with air quality, energy, and noise, as a result of the proposed project would be the same as what was previously identified, and the mitigation measures for impacts related to noise set forth in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, would remain applicable.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in any changes, new circumstances, or new information that would involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts related to air quality, energy, or noise from what has been anticipated for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Implementation of the mitigation measures in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, would continue to ensure impacts would be less than significant.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Because the proposed project would not involve any changes to the anticipated land uses associated with the site and would result in the same area of disturbance and number of units, the same level of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operation of the proposed project would occur as what has already been anticipated for the project site and analyzed in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. In addition, as noted above statewide standards related to air quality and energy consumption have progressively become more

EXHIBIT D
647
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 15 ends

May 2024
stringent over time, such as the 2022 California Building Energy Efficiency Standards Code and the CALGreen Code. Such standards, as well as technological innovations, are also anticipated to reduce GHG emissions over time.

In addition to advancements in statewide standards and regulations, since the 2007 IS/MND and 2017 Addendum were approved, the City has taken numerous actions towards promoting sustainability within the City, including updating the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP). The City adopted the updated CAP on November 28, 2022. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) thresholds of significance related to GHG emissions have also been updated since the 2007 IS/MND and 2017 Addendum were approved. According to the BAAQMD’s current thresholds of significance for GHG emissions, a project must either include specific project design elements related to buildings and transportation or be consistent with a local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b). The City of Livermore 2022 CAP meets the criteria to be a GHG reduction strategy under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b). Therefore, the analysis herein, similar to the analysis within the 2017 Addendum, is based on consistency with City’s CAP.

The 2022 CAP is intended to create a roadmap to achieve emissions reductions of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and carbon neutrality (i.e., net zero carbon emissions) by 2045. The CAP contains mitigation strategies and actions, consistent with State climate mitigation targets, which were developed to reduce the City’s GHG emissions to reach its adopted reduction targets for 2030 and 2045. The project’s consistency with the applicable mitigation strategies and actions of the 2022 CAP is assessed in Table 1 below.

Table 1
Project Consistency with the City of Livermore CAP
Strategies and Actions Consistency Discussion
Strategy D-1: Improve water
conservation and reuse.

All landscaping improvements would be required to comply with Section

13.25 of the Municipal Code, Water Efficient Landscape, and would be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system. The proposed project would be required to comply with Section 4.301 of the CALGreen Code to conserve water used indoors, outdoors, and in wastewater conveyance.

Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with Strategy D-1.

Action D-1.3: Continue
implementing the Water
Efficient Landscape
Ordinance.

As discussed above, all landscaping improvements would be required to comply with Section 13.25, Water Efficient Landscape, of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, the proposed project would be consistent with Action D-1.3.

Action F-1.5: Require new
hardscape to be permeable.

Page 46 ends

must first update standards for new development hardscape to be consistent with CALGreen Tier 1 and/or increase the current fee for installation of new impervious surfaces. The City has not yet updated its standards and, thus, consistency with Action F-1.5 is not required.

Strategy B-1: Require new
buildings to be all-electric
and incentivize electrification
retrofits of existing buildings.

According to Section 15.26.200 of the City of Livermore Municipal Code, all newly constructed buildings within the City are required to be allelectric. The project applicant has committed to the prohibition of natural gas infrastructure in the proposed project design, in compliance with Section 15.26.200 of the City of Livermore Municipal Code. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with Strategy B-1.

Action B-1.1: Require new
construction to be all-electric.

See consistency discussion for Strategy B-1.

EXHIBIT D
648
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 16 ends

May 2024
Table 1
Project Consistency with the City of Livermore CAP
Strategies and Actions Consistency Discussion
Action T-1.1: Expand EV
infrastructure to support EV
adoption.

The 2022 CBSC, as well as the City’s Reach Code amendments to the CBSC, require new developments to include the necessary electrical infrastructure for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. The proposed project would be required to comply with the 2022 CBSC or the City’s Reach Code, whichever is the more stringent standard at the time of construction. For example, under the City’s Reach Code, new construction of one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses with attached private garages are required to provide two Level 2 EV Ready spaces, where Level 2 EV Ready means a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt, 40-amp circuit.

Given the proposed project’s required compliance with the 2022 CBSC and/or the City’s Reach Code, the proposed project would be consistent with Action T-1.1.

Strategy W-1: Reduce the
amount of waste that is
landfilled.

The project would be required to comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 8.08, Solid Waste Management, of the City’s Municipal Code.

In addition, as discussed below, the proposed project would be required to comply with the CALGreen Code’s construction waste diversion standards during construction of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would generally be consistent with Strategy W-1.

Action W-1.5: Reduce
construction waste.

The CALGreen Code requires all new construction projects to recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum 65 percent of all non-hazardous construction and demolition waste. The proposed project would be required to comply with the CALGreen Code standards, and, therefore, would be consistent with Action W-1.5.

Source: City of Livermore Climate Action Plan, 2022.

As presented in the table, the proposed project would comply with the applicable mitigation strategies and actions set forth in the 2022 CAP and would, therefore, be consistent with the local GHG reduction strategy that meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b).

Transportation
Because the proposed project would not involve any changes to the anticipated land uses associated with the site and would result in the same area of disturbance and number of units, the same level of traffic associated with both construction and operation of the proposed project would occur compared to what has already been anticipated and analyzed for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Additionally, elimination of the pedestrian bridge component would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts.

The pedestrian bridge was intended to be a private amenity for the future on-site residents of the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood only, serving to provide connection between the eastern and western portions of the site. The pedestrian bridge was not intended to provide regional connectivity or connectivity to off-site areas. For example, the pedestrian bridge is not identified in the General Plan or the City’s Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan (ATP). The multi-use trail along the west side of the Arroyo Seco Channel is identified in the ATP, which would remain

EXHIBIT D
649
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 17 ends

May 2024
with the proposed project. In addition, pedestrian connectivity between the eastern and western portions of the site would still be available along Las Positas Road, located just south of where the pedestrian bridge was previously proposed. Internal connectivity throughout the eastern and western portions of the site would also continue to be provided with the proposed project.

Wayfinding amenities are proposed to help enhance the path of travel for residents from Las Positas Road into the project. Therefore, impacts associated with transportation as a result of the proposed project would be the same as what was previously identified, and the mitigation measures set forth in the 2007 IS/MND would remain applicable.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in any changes, new circumstances, or new information that would involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts related to transportation from what has been anticipated for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Implementation of the mitigation measures in the 2007 IS/MND and 2017 Addendum would continue to ensure impacts would be less than significant.

Land Use, Planning, Population, Housing, Public Services, and Utilities Because the proposed project would not involve any changes to the anticipated land uses or number of residential units for the site compared to what was anticipated in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, an increase in housing and/or population associated with buildout of the site would not occur, which would result in the same level of demand for public services and utilities as previously anticipated and planned for the site. Additionally, the proposed project would adhere to Section 15.26.200 of the City of Livermore Municipal Code which requires all newly constructed buildings within the City to be all-electric. Therefore, overall, impacts associated with land use, planning, population, housing, public services, and utilities as a result of the proposed project would be the same as what was identified in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in any changes, new circumstances, or new information that would involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts related to land use and planning, population and housing, public services, or utilities from what has been anticipated for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. .

Hydrology and Water Quality
The disturbance area associated with the proposed project would be the same as what has been anticipated for the site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Accordingly, short-term construction-related impacts associated with hydrology and water quality as a result of buildout of the project site would be the same as what has been anticipated previously. In addition, the same amount of impervious surface area and associated stormwater runoff would be expected on the site as a result of the proposed project compared to what is already anticipated. Therefore, the same impacts related to operational hydrology and water quality would occur under the proposed project as compared to what was anticipated for the site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. Overall, impacts associated with hydrology and water quality as a result of the proposed project would be the same as what was identified in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017.

EXHIBIT D
650
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project
Addendum

Page 18 ends

May 2024
Remaining Impact Areas
Because the disturbance area associated with the proposed project would be the same as what is anticipated for the site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017, the proposed project would involve the same level of impacts associated with buildout of the site related to the conversion of or conflicts associated with agricultural land/farmland, the potential discovery of previously unknown cultural or tribal cultural resources, the suitability of soils on the site for development, the presence of potentially hazardous conditions, mineral resources, recreation, and exacerbation of wildfire risks. For similar reasons, impacts associated with biological resources due to development of the site would also be the same as what is anticipated for the site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. However, because the pedestrian bridge would not be constructed under the proposed project, any impacts and associated mitigation measures identified in the 2007 IS/MND specific to the pedestrian bridge (e.g., Mitigation Measure 7.c.1 from the 2007 IS/MND) would no longer be required. All other mitigation measures related to biological resources set forth in the 2007 IS/MND and 2017 Addendum would remain applicable to the proposed project.

Accordingly, the proposed project would not result in any changes, new circumstances, or new information that would involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts related to agriculture resources, biological resources, cultural and tribal cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, mineral resources, recreation, and wildfire from what has been anticipated for the project site in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017.

Implementation of the mitigation measures set forth in the 2007 IS/MND and 2017 Addendum would continue to ensure impacts would be less than significant.

G. CONCLUSION
As established in the discussions above regarding the potential effects of the proposed project, the proposed project would not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new significant impacts, a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts, or new mitigation measures from what was analyzed in the 2007 IS/MND, as amended in 2017. As such, the proposed project would not result in any conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and a subsequent IS/MND is not required.

EXHIBIT D
651
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 24-002, FOR THE

ARROYO VISTA RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, TO REMOVE THE ARROYO VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN’S BRIDGE REQUIREMENT AND AMEND FIGURES

TO REMOVE THE BRIDGE
In December 2016, the City of Livermore (“City”) received an application from SummerHill Livermore LLC to develop the approximately 29-acre vacant parcel located at the southeast corner of the Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road intersection with a residential development project.

On January 19, 2023, TH Arroyo Vista LLC (“Applicant”) acquired the project property from SummerHill Livermore LLC to develop the approximately 29-acre vacant parcel located at the southeast corner of the Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road intersection with a residential development project, consistent with the 2017 approval.

On January 25, 2024, the City received a modified application from the Applicant for approximately 15-acres of the site that is currently being graded to allow construction of the residential buildings that are not subject to this amendment. The entitlements for the modified Project include Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002, Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24-001, Planned Development (PD) 24-001, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002 (collectively, the “Project”). The modified Project would remove the bridge requirement due to it becoming infeasible. The modified Project would develop at the intersection of southeast of Las Positas and Arroyo Vista Road, consistent with the 2017 approval. The modified Project would be increased from two stories to three stories and allow a height of up to 45 feet on the 86 for sale singlefamily residential homes. The Project also includes a Development Agreement Amendment between the City and Developer, Planned Development rezoning, and Specific Plan Amendments. The Development Agreement Amendment removes the bridge requirement that became infeasible due to liability issues. In place of the bridge landings, the Project proposes two pocket parks. Additionally, an in-lieu contribution of $2,000,000 would be provided to the Community Benefit Fund and the Social Opportunity Endowment Fund. The Planned Development rezoning removes the bridge requirement as well and allows for building heights of up to 45 feet and 3 stories. Finally, the Specific Plan amendments removes the bridge requirement.

The proposed Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan (“Neighborhood Plan”) amendments would allow the Project to be implemented by removing the bridge requirement due to the construction of the bridge becoming infeasible. Removing the bridge requirement would facilitate the Project.

On July 16, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the Project, heard public testimony, made the necessary findings, and adopted Planning Commission resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending the City Council approve the Project.
652
RESOLUTION NO. ________
On September 9, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

Together with this resolution, the City Council concurrently considered resolutions for Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002 and ordinances for: 1) the Project’s Development Agreement (DAA) 24-001 application; and 2) the Project’s Planned Development rezoning (PD) 24-001 application.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the Record Evidence and approved a resolution adopting the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project Addendum to the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration [IS/MND] (SCH #2007052028), as amended by the 2017 addendum, consistent with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this resolution, and as described below:

1. A Specific Plan may only be amended if first found consistent with the General Plan in compliance with Government Code Section 65454.

Findings: The Project proposes a Specific Plan Amendment to: 1) Amend Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan to remove the bridge requirement; and 2) Amend the figures to remove the bridge. Each component of the Amendment is consistent with the General Plan, as follows:

Consistency with Open Space and Conservation
The Project site has a General Plan land use designation of Light Intensity Industrial (LII), Urban High Density Residential (UH-3), and Open Space (OS) floating designation. The Project is consistent with the land use designation and implements the General Plan goals for UH-3 and OS. The proposed amendments would facilitate the Project, which removes the 653
RESOLUTION NO. ________
bridge requirement due to the construction of the bridge becoming infeasible. For example, removing the bridge requirement would reduce the maintenance obligations for the City by $73,000 per year. Per the General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element, Objective OSC-5.4, Policy 1:

The City shall continue to encourage public access to, and maintenance of, existing recreational trails in the Planning Areas. The City would ultimately be responsible for the maintenance of the bridge over the public walking trail. The tax revenue generated from the property tax would help to offset maintenance costs such as the benches along the trail. The maintenance costs for the bridge are substantial and the revenue from property tax would not offset the cost of maintenance for the bridge. Therefore, amending the bridge requirement would facilitate the proposed Project.

Consistency with Economic Development and Fiscal Element Furthermore, the proposed amendment would facilitate the Project by sustaining a level of maintenance expenses that are consistent with the tax base generated by the residential taxes. The maintenance obligations of the bridge are estimated to be $73,000 a year. Per the General Plan Economic Development and Fiscal Element, Objective ED-3.1, P2: The City shall strive to maintain taxes and fees at a level adequate to provide necessary services. Amending the bridge requirement creates consistency between the Project and the Economic Development and Fiscal Element by ensuring that the tax base can support the maintenance expenses.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002, attached hereto as Exhibit B for the Arroyo Vista Residential Development.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore finds that the effective date of this resolution shall be the effective date of Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore California.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on September 9, 2024, by the following vote:
654
RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/s/ Katherine Mirassou
Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24
Exhibit B – Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Amendments
655

EXHIBIT A
656

EXHIBIT A
657

EXHIBIT A
658

EXHIBIT A
659

EXHIBIT A
660

EXHIBIT A
661

EXHIBIT A
662

EXHIBIT A
663

EXHIBIT A
664

EXHIBIT A
665

EXHIBIT A
666

EXHIBIT A
667
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Amendments
Staff recommends the following amendments to the Neighborhood Plan. Text additions are shown in underline and text deletions are shown in strikeout.

Project Description

1. Page i-v, is amended as follows: As shown in the illustrative plans in Chapter 2, the street and open space network serves as the framework for development of this traditional neighborhood. Although the Plan Area includes two sub-neighborhoods, both are tiered off of an open space and circulation system that includes parks which are easily accessible to all neighborhood residents. Similarly, the buffer areas along the Arroyo Seco Channel are easily accessed by both neighborhoods. A pedestrian bridge over the channel is proposed to facilitate access to either side. Primary building entries front onto sidewalks and tree lined streets, paseos, or common open space areas.

Buildings all front or side onto public or common landscape areas, and garages are located away from primary roads and walkways.

Chapter 1 – Existing Conditions

2. Page 1-4, Figure 1.2: Neighborhood Analysis is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 1 for a copy of the revised figure.

3. Page 1-9, is revised as follows: Currently, Las Positas is a two-lane road along the Site’s frontage (from Arroyo Vista Road to Bennett Drive). An existing development agreement between the Arroyo Vista property owner and City requires certain public improvements to be constructed in conjunction with any development on this Site. These improvements are outlined in specific detail in the City’s Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program and include:
widening Las Positas Road from 2 to 4 lanes, adding a median, and providing bike lanes on both sides. and constructing a new bridge to cross the Arroyo Seco Channel, which traverses the midpoint of the Site from north to south.

4. Page 1-15, is amended as follows: The location of the channel and future trail improvements along the Zone 7 service road through the Site provide an opportunity for direct connectivity to the trail from the Site. There is also opportunity for enhanced, natural landscaping and open space areas in the proposed setback area adjacent to the channel. However, the location of the channel is also a constraint in that it bisects or divides the Site into two sub-neighborhoods. For this reason, careful attention should be paid to provide a separated connection to the trail and to both sides of the project along the Arroyo Seco Channel and Las Positas Road. A pedestrian bridge is also recommended to cross the channel and connect the two sub-neighborhoods.

Chapter 2 – Neighborhood Land Uses

1. Page 2-5, is amended as follows: As shown in the conceptual plans, the street and open space network serves as the framework for development of this traditional neighborhood. Although the Plan Area includes two neighborhoods on each side of the channel, both are organized around usable, well defined park areas which are easily

EXHIBIT B
668
accessible to all neighborhood residents. Similarly, the buffer area along the Arroyo Seco Channel is easily accessed by both. The two neighborhoods are to be connected by a pedestrian bridge facilitating access to either side. Primary building entries front onto sidewalks and tree lined streets, paseos, or common open space areas. Buildings all front or side onto public or common landscape areas, and garages are located away from primary road and walkways.

5. Page 2-6, Figure 2.1: Conceptual Land Use Plan A (14.1 du/acre) is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 2 for a copy of the revised figure.

6. Page 2-7, Figure 2.2: Conceptual Land Use Plan B (17.3 du/acre) is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 3 for a copy of the revised figure.

7. Page 2-9, is amended as follows: The Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan envisions a walkable community with a series of pedestrian connections and a hierarchy of interconnected streets and pedestrian pathways. The neighborhood should be a unique community that focuses on livability, quality of life, and that provides a variety of amenities such as a private neighborhood center with pool, playground facilities, parks and open space. Multi-use trails will be constructed parallel to and along both sides of the Arroyo Seco Channel. Trail crossings will be provided at Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Roads. A pedestrian bridge will connect either sides of the Channel providing easy access to both sides of the community.

8. Page 2-20, is amended as follows: The street and open space network serves as the basic framework for neighborhood development. Although the Plan Area includes two neighborhoods on each side of the channel, both include one usable, well defined open space area easily accessible to all residents and a pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Seco linking the two areas. The Arroyo Vista Neighborhood should have at least one park, of a minimum .20 acre size on each side of the Arroyo Seco. These neighborhood parks are to be easily accessible to residents and visible from the adjacent streets and surrounding uses.

9. Page 2-21, is amended as follows: A multi-use pathway is also proposed within the required minimum 30-foot building setback from the site property line on either side of the channel. Along with the public multi-use trail proposed for the 20-foot Zone 7 service road, a minimum 50-foot setback will be provided from the top of the creek bank to any building. This trail will provide connectivity from different areas of the community to the Arroyo Seco and ultimately leading to the public citywide multi-use trail. The buffer area along the Arroyo Seco Channel is easily accessed by both neighborhoods with a pedestrian bridge leading to either side of the channel. A trail on the east side of the channel shall also be required.

Chapter 3 – Circulation System

1. Page 3-4, Figure 3.1: Conceptual Circulation is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 4 for a copy of the revised figure.

2. Page 3-17, Figure 3.8: Concept Plan A (14.1 du/acre) – Parking Diagram is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 5 for a copy of the revised figure.

3. Page 3-18, Figure 3.9: Concept Plan B (17.3 du/acre) – Parking Diagram is amended to remove the Pedestrian Bridge. Refer to attachment 6 for a copy of the revised figure.

Chapter 6 – Implementation

1. Page 6-5 is amended as follows: The developer(s) of the Site will be required to fund improvements to implement trail standards for a public multi-use trail along the existing

EXHIBIT B
669
Zone 7 service Road along the west side of the Arroyo Seco Channel adjacent to the Project Site. This proposed trail is outlined within the City’s Bikeways and Trails Master Plan. Potential improvements would include upgrading the road with asphalt, striping and decomposed granite. In order to implement a publicly accessible trail for recreation purposes on property owned and maintained by Zone 7, the City will need to enter into a License Agreement with Zone 7 for maintenance and liability.

The developer(s) of the Site will also be required to fund improvements for a neighborhood trail on the east side of the Channel, adjacent to the Project Site, in conjunction with a pedestrian bridge crossing across the Channel. The pedestrian bridge must clear span the Arroyo. Specific bridge design details including bridge height are subject to Zone 7 standards and must be coordinated with Zone 7.

EXHIBIT B
670
Attachments:

1. Figure 1.2: Neighborhood Analysis

2. Figure 2.1: Conceptual Land Use Plan A (14.1
du/acre)

3. Figure 2.2: Conceptual Land Use Plan B (17.3
du/acre)

4. Figure 3.1: Conceptual Circulation

5. Figure 3.8: Concept Plan A (14.1 du/acre)

6. Figure 3.9: Concept Plan B (17.3 du/acre)

EXHIBIT B
671
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
1-4
Figure 1.2: Neighborhood Analysis

EXHIBIT
B
672
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
2-6
Figure 2.1: Conceptual Land Use Plan A (14.1 du/acre)

EXHIBIT
B
673
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
2-7
Figure 2.2: Conceptual Land Use Plan B (17.3 du/acre)

EXHIBIT
B
674
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
3-4
Figure 3.1: Conceptual Circulation

EXHIBIT
B
675
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
3-17
Figure 3.8: Concept Plan A (14.1 du/acre) - Parking Diagram Project BoundaryOff-Site Parking (Las Positas Rd., Bennet Dr., and Arroyo Vista)On-Site Surface ParkingNumber of Off-Site Parking Spaces Legend
994 Total On-Site Spaces 190 Surface Spaces 804 Garage Spaces 136 Total Off-Site Spaces Parking Summary
#
Arroyo Vista Arroyo Seco Channel
Las Positas Rd.

Bennett Dr.

Contractors St.

First St.
14 6 14
11 28
10 27
11 7
8 EXHIBIT
B
676
FINAL 07.07
DRAFT
3-18
Figure 3.9: Concept Plan B (17.3 du/acre) - Parking Diagram

EXHIBIT
B
677
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION (SPDRM) 24-002 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE ARROYO

VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT
The City of Livermore (“City”) received an application for Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002 to modify the 2017 approval located southeast of the Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road intersection (“Project”). The modified Project would be increased from two stories to three stories and allow a height of up to 45 feet on the 86 for sale single-family residential homes, two approximately 0.2-acre neighborhood parks with an additional approximately 0.5 acre of pocket parks, street improvements, street trees, and utility infrastructure. The Project also includes a Development Agreement Amendment between the City and Developer, Planned Development rezoning, and Specific Plan Amendments. The Development Agreement Amendment removes the bridge requirement that became infeasible due to liability issues. In place of the bridge landings, the Project proposes two pocket parks. Additionally, an in-lieu contribution of $2,000,000 would be provided to the Community Benefit Fund and the Social Opportunity Endowment Fund. The Planned Development rezoning removes the bridge requirement as well and allows for building heights of up to 45 feet and 3 stories.

Finally, the Specific Plan amendments remove the bridge requirement.

At a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the Project and staff recommendation, heard public testimony, made the necessary findings and adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, containing the Planning Commission’s actions and/or recommendations thereon.

On September 9, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the Record Evidence and adopted a resolution finding the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
678
RESOLUTION NO. ________
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this resolution. Based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council hereby approves Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002 subject to the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto as Exhibit C, for the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Development.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore California.

On motion of Council Member , seconded by Council
Member , the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on September 9, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

EXHIBIT A
680

EXHIBIT A
681

EXHIBIT A
682

EXHIBIT A
683

EXHIBIT A
684

EXHIBIT A
685

EXHIBIT A
686

EXHIBIT A
687

EXHIBIT A
688

EXHIBIT A
689

EXHIBIT A
690

EXHIBIT A
691
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached - Tract # 8714 Livermore
June 11, 2024
0 50 100 150

VICINITY MAP
N
SITE

CITY OF

LIVERMORE

SHEET INDEX
PAGE NO. SHEET NO. SHEET TITLE

ARCHITECTURE PLANS

CIVIL PLANS

LANDSCAPE PLANS

PELL PROPERTY SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED
PROJECT CONTACTS:

EXHIBIT B
692

EXHIBIT B
693
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
694
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
695
44'-0" UP
23'-6"
2-CAR GARAGE
22'-7" x 20'-4"
ENTRY
PORCH
16'-0" x 39'-7"
ADU
BATH

WALK-IN CLOSET ADU

BEDROOM
12'-6" x 10'-1"
ADU
9'-10" x 15'-5"
2'-3" 5'-8"

BIKE STORAGE

SUSPENDED FROM

CEILING
PER LMC & 2022 GBSC FOR EV CHARGING

REQUIREMENTS, EACH DWELLING UNIT GARAGE
WILL BE PRE-WIRED FOR MIN 8.3KVa 208/240V, 40 AMP RECEPTACLE LABELED 'ELECTRICAL VEHICLE OUT' & CONNECTED TO A DEDICATED BREAKER TRASH ORG. RECYC.

DN UP
PWDR
DINING
13'-5" x 12'-6"
FAMILY
22'-7" x 15'-5"

KITCHEN
PANTRY

LINEN DECK
7'-0" x 24'-1"
OFFICE
D W
DN
BA 2
LNDY
7'-4" x 6'-1"

PRIMARY
BATH

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
13'-3" x 14'-0"

WALK-IN CLOSET
LINEN
BEDROOM 2
11'-4" x 11'-10"
BEDROOM 3
10'-11" x 11'-9"
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
June 3, 2024

SQUARE FOOTAGES

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
ADU
2-CAR GARAGE

PORCH 'A'
DECK
163 SQ. FT.
1070 SQ. FT.
996 SQ. FT.
2229 SQ. FT.
376 SQ. FT.
487 SQ. FT.
366 SQ. FT.
169 SQ. FT.
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 1 FLOOR PLANS
A03

THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN

EXHIBIT B
696
8'-0" 9'-1" 9'-1" 29'-4" T.O.S.

T.O.PL.T.O.SF.

T.O.PL.

ADU

BEDROOM
ADU
BATH 2-CAR GARAGE
FAMILY

PRIMARY
BATH BA 2 BEDROOM 2
KITCHEN 37'-3 1/8" T.O. RIDGE 9'-1" HD. HT. 8'-0" HD. HT. 8'-0" HD. HT.

Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 1 SECTION
A03.1

SECTION
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
697
7 :12 7 :12
4 :12
4 :12 4 :12
7 :12
7 :12 4 :12
4 :12 7 :12 7 :12 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE
VALLEY
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP 7 :12

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIONS
1'-0" TYP. EAVE RIDGE

VALLEY RIDGE
4 :12 5 :12 HIP
VALLEY
5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP

HIP RIDGE
HIP 4 :12
4 :12 4 :12 4 :12
4 :12 5 :12 5 :12
5 :12
5 :12
HIP
TYP. EAVE
1'-0"

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL LOCATIONS RIDGE
VALLEY HIP RIDGE RIDGE6 :12
6 :126 :12 HIP VALLEY
6 :12 6 :12 5 :12 6 :12
HIP
HIP
4 :12 4 :12 4 :12
4 :12
TYP. EAVE
2'-0"

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIONS
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 1 ROOF PLANS
A04

CRAFTSMAN 'C' PRAIRIE 'B' RANCH 'A'
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
698
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
699
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
700
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
701
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
702
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
703
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
704
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
705
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
706
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
707
WH
UP 44'-10"
21'-0"
2-CAR GARAGE
20'-1" x 23'-0"
ENTRY
PORCH
22'-0" x 7'-0"

WALK-IN CLOSET
BEDROOM 4
11'-2" x 10'-9"
BA 3

BIKE STORAGE

SUSPENDED FROM
CEILING 5'-8" 2'-3"
PER LMC & 2022 GBSC FOR EV CHARGING

REQUIREMENTS, EACH DWELLING UNIT GARAGE
WILL BE PRE-WIRED FOR MIN 8.3KVa 208/240V, 40 AMP RECEPTACLE LABELED 'ELECTRICAL VEHICLE OUT' & CONNECTED TO A DEDICATED BREAKER ORG. TRASH RECYC.

DN
UP
PWDR
DINING
15'-0" x 10'-4"
FAMILY
20'-1" x 14'-3"

KITCHEN
PANTRY
LINEN
DECK
21'-0" x 7'-0"
W D
DN
BA 2

PRIMARY
BATH

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
16'-1" x 13'-7"

WALK-IN
CLOSET
BEDROOM 2
10'-8" x 10'-6"
BEDROOM 3
11'-7" x 10'-10"
LNDY
3'-0" x 6'-1"
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore

SQUARE FOOTAGES

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE

PORCH 'A'
DECK
461 SQ. FT.
899 SQ. FT.
980 SQ. FT.
2340 SQ. FT.
497 SQ. FT.
154 SQ. FT.
147 SQ. FT.
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 2 FLOOR PLANS
A14

THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
708

PDWR FAMILY
BEDROOM 3
2-CAR GARAGE 8'-0" 9'-1" 9'-1" 29'-4" T.O.S.

T.O.PL. T.O.SF.

T.O.PL.T.O.SF.

T.O.PL. 9'-1" HD. HT. 8'-0" HD. HT. 36'-9 7/8" T.O. RIDGE Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 2 SECTION
A14.1

SECTION
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
709
7 :12 7 :12 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE
7 :12 7 :12
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 7 :12
POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL LOCATIONS 1'-0" TYP. EAVE
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP

HIP HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
VALLEY
VALLEY

VALLEY RIDGE
5 :12 5 :12 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE
5 :12 5 :12
5 :12
5 :12 5 :12 5 :12
5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12
TYP. EAVE
1'-0"
POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL LOCATIONS 5 :12
RIDGE 6 :12 6 :12 RIDGE6 :12 6 :12 RIDGE6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 6 :12
TYP. EAVE
2'-0"

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIONS
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 2 ROOF PLANS
A15

CRAFTSMAN 'C' PRAIRIE 'B' RANCH 'A'
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
710
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
711
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
712
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
713
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
714
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
715
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
716
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
717
WH
PORCH
288 S.F.
7 :12 7 :12 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE
7 :12 7 :12
VALLEY
VALLEY
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP
7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 7 :12 4 :12
4 :12
4 :12 4 :12

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL LOCATIONS
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 2 RANCH 'A' WRAPPED PORCH FLOOR & ROOF PLANS
A23

WRAPPED PORCH

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

WRAPPED PORCH

ROOF PLAN
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
718
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
719
WH
UP 44'-0"
24'-0"
2-CAR GARAGE
23'-1" x 20'-7"
ENTRY
PORCH
24'-0" x 8'-8"
WALK-IN CLOSETBEDROOM 4
13'-5" x 12'-1"
BA 3
2'-3" 5'-8" BIKE STORAGE

SUSPENDED

FROM CEILING
PER LMC & 2022 GBSC FOR EV CHARGING

REQUIREMENTS, EACH DWELLING UNIT GARAGE
WILL BE PRE-WIRED FOR MIN 8.3KVa 208/240V, 40 AMP RECEPTACLE LABELED 'ELECTRICAL VEHICLE OUT' & CONNECTED TO A DEDICATED BREAKER TRASH ORG. RECYC. W D DN
UP
PWDR
DINING
16'-7" x 10'-1"
FAMILY
17'-10" x 15'-10"

KITCHEN PANTRY
LINEN
DECK
24'-0" x 8'-8"
LNDY
6'-2" x 7'-7"
DN
BA 2

PRIMARY
BATH

PRIMARY

BEDROOM
13'-5" x 12'-11" WALK-IN CLOSET
BEDROOM 2
11'-3" x 11'-1"
BEDROOM 3
11'-6" x 11'-4"
LINEN
LINEN
LINEN
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore

SQUARE FOOTAGES

FIRST FLOOR

SECOND FLOOR

THIRD FLOOR

TOTAL LIVING
2-CAR GARAGE

PORCH 'A'

DECK 'A'
501 SQ. FT.
982 SQ. FT.
970 SQ. FT.
2453 SQ. FT.
505 SQ. FT.
180 SQ. FT.
170 SQ. FT.
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 3 FLOOR PLANS
A25

THIRD FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
720
37'-4 7/8" T.O. RIDGE 8'-0" 9'-1" 9'-1" 29'-4" T.O.S.

T.O.PL. T.O.SF.

T.O.PL.T.O.SF.

T.O.PL. 9'-1" HD. HT. 8'-0" HD. HT.
2-CAR GARAGE

PDWR LNDY
BA 2 BEDROOM 3
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 3 SECTION
A25.1

SECTION
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
721
7 :12 7 :12
4 :12
7 :12
4 :12 7 :12 7 :12 RIDGE RIDGE RIDGEVALLEY
VALLEY
HIP
HIP
HIP 7 :12 7 :12
HIP
HIP7 :12 4 :12
HIP
7 :12
HIP
HIP

HIP HIP

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIONS
1'-0" TYP. EAVE RIDGE RIDGE 5 :12
HIP
VALLEY
5 :12 5 :12 5 :12 5 :12
HIP
HIP
HIP
HIP

HIP HIP
HIP 5 :12 5 :12
5 :12
HIP
HIPR. RIDGE
HIP
VALLEY 5 :12
5 :12
5 :12 5 :12
TYP. EAVE
1'-0"

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL
LOCATIONS RIDGE R. RIDGE6 :12
6 :12 6 :12 6 :12 RIDGE 4 :12
6 :12 6 :12
6 :12 2'-0" TYP. EAVE

POTENTIAL SOLAR PANEL

LOCATIONS
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
PLAN 3 ROOF PLANS
A26

CRAFTSMAN 'C' PRAIRIE 'B' RANCH 'A'
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
722
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
723
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
724
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
725
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
726
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
727
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
728
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
729
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore RANCH DOOR & WINDOW DETAILS
A34
WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x WD. TRIM
2x WD. TRIM
SHAPED 2x WD. TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" WOOD POT SHELF
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"
(2) 2x6 FLAT - SLOPE
TO DRAIN 1/4" MIN
2x8 WD. TRIM
6x SHAPED WD. CORBEL
TRIM SEE ELEV.

CL WOOD SHUTTER SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"
PRE-MANUF.

SHUTTER
DOOR HEAD w/ TRIM

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

FIBERGLASS DOOR
2x WD. TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
COMP. SHINGLE

ROOFING

HORIZONTAL LAP
SIDING

VINYL WINDOWS

FIBERGLASS DOOR

WOOD SHUTTHER

WOOD POT SHELF

BOARD AND BATTEN
SIDING

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

EXTERIOR

FINISH -
SEE
ELEV.

TRIM BETWEEN WINDOWS SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x WD. TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
730
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore PRAIRIE DOOR & WINDOW DETAILS
A35
WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x FOAM TRIM
2x FOAM TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" COMP. SHINGLE

ROOFING

HORIZONTAL LAP
SIDING

VINYL WINDOWS

FIBERGLASS DOOR

BRICK VENEER
STUCCO
STUCCO
DOOR HEAD @ EXT. PLASTER
2x FOAM TRIM
STUCCO

FIBERGLASS
DOOR
STUCCO
WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x WD. TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM SCALE: 3"=1'-0"

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x4 o/ 2x6 WD. TRIM
STUCCO
WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM SCALE: 3"=1'-0"

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x WD. TRIM

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

WINDOW TO WINDOW w/ TRIMSCALE: 3"=1'-0"

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
2x FOAM TRIM
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
731
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore CRAFTSMAN DOOR & WINDOW DETAILS
A36
WINDOW SILL w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW HEAD w/ TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME
(2) 2x WD. TRIM
(2) 2x WD. TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0" WOOD POT SHELF
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
SCALE: 1 1/2"=1'-0"
(2) 2x6 FLAT - SLOPE
TO DRAIN 1/4" MIN
2x4 WD. TRIM
6x SHAPED WD. CORBEL
DOOR HEAD w/ TRIM

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

FIBERGLASS DOOR
(2) 2x WD. TRIM
SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
COMP. SHINGLE

ROOFING

STONE VENEER

VINYL WINDOWS

FIBERGLASS DOOR

WOOD POT SHELF

SHINGLE SIDING

EXTERIOR FINISH - SEE
ELEV.

TRIM BETWEEN WINDOWS SCALE: 3"=1'-0"
2x WD. TRIM

VINYL WINDOW FRAME

HORIZONTAL LAP
SIDING
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
732
27'-0" HIGH

FIRE LADDER
2%
SLOPE
MIN. CLEAR
70°
3'-0" 9'-9 1/4" LOWEST EDGE OF ROOF
4 12 9'-11 1/2" LOWEST EDGE OF ROOF
27'-0" HIGH

FIRE LADDER
2%
SLOPE
3'-0"
MIN. CLEAR
70° 20'-1 1/4" LOWEST EDGE OF ROOF
27'-0" HIGH

FIRE LADDER
2%
SLOPE
3'-0"
MIN. CLEAR
70°
4 12
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached Livermore LADDER REACH REQUIREMENTS
A37
0 1' 2' 3' 4' 8'
A
PLAN 1

FRONT ELEVATION B
PLAN 2

RIGHT ELEVATION C
PLAN 3

RIGHT ELEVATION
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
733
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
734
June 3, 2024

EXHIBIT B
735

E ALLEY (ADORA LOOP)

A STREET (VILANA STREET) A STREET (VILANA STREET)

F ALLEY (ADORA LOOP) I ALLEY

C ALLEY

B STREET
(MARENGO LOOP)

H ALLEY G ALLEY (ADORA LOOP)

D ALLEY(ADORA LOOP) LAS POSITAS ROAD

ARROYO VISTA

S ALLEY

T ALLEY

U ALLEY
V ALLEY 3" 3" 3"
29 30
31 32 33
34 35
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
20 19
10 9 11 12 13
14 15
16 17
18 8
7 6
5 4
2 1
40 39
38 37
36 51
52 53
54 55
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
56 57 58 59
63 62 61 60
64 65 66 67
70 71
69 68
75 74 72 73
79 78 77 76
81 80
83 84
82 86
85 3
21 W ALLEY
NOT A PART 3" 3" 3" NOT A PART

B STREET (MARENGO LOOP) NORTH PERPENDICULAR

PARKING W/ ROLLED CURB

TYPICAL A STREET (VILANA STREET)WITH

PERPENDICULAR PARKING

TYPICAL A STREET (VILANA STREET) WITH

PARALLEL PARKING

TYPICAL F ALLEY (ADORA LOOP), H ALLEY

TYPICAL D ALLEY & E ALLEY (ADORA LOOP) E ALLEY (ADORA LOOP) WITH FACING DRIVEWAYS

TYPICAL I ALLEY

TYPICAL C ALLEY

TYPICAL S-W ALLEY
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached - Tract # 8714 Livermore
June 11, 2024
0 50 100 150

KEY MAP
LEGEND
1 ABBREVIATIONS

SINGLE FAMILY SETBACK

SINGLE FAMILY SEPARATION

SITE PLAN (WEST)
PD.1

PARKING SUMMARY TABLE

REQUIRED PARKING
(86 SFU * (2 COVERED STALLS + 1 GUEST
STALL)
258

PROVIDED PARKING
86 SFU * (2 GARAGE SPACES) 172

GUEST STALLS
86 SFU * (1 GUEST STALL) 86

PROPOSED PUBLIC STALLS
(ARROYO VISTA) 15

BIKE PARKING STALLS (SEE LANDSCAPE
PLANS FOR LOCATIONS) 18

ADA STALL DETAIL

EXHIBIT B
736
3" 3" 3"

NOT A PART
29 30 31 32 33 34 35
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
20 19
10 9 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 8
7 6
5 4
2 1
40 39
38 37
36 51 52 53 54 55
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
56 57 58 59
63 62 61 60
64 65 66 67
71 70 69 68
75 74 73 72
79 78 77 76
81 80
83 84
82 85 86
3 21

F ALLEY (ADORA LOOP) I ALLEY

B STREET (MARENGO LOOP) G ALLEY (ADORA LOOP)

H ALLEY D ALLEY (ADORA LOOP) E ALLEY (ADORA LOOP)

A STREET (VILANA STREET)

LAS POSITAS ROAD

ARROYO VISTA

C ALLEY

S ALLEY

T ALLEY

U ALLEY

V ALLEY
W ALLEY 3" 3" 3" NOT A PART
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached - Tract # 8714 Livermore
June 11, 2024
0 50 100 150

ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND

GRADING AND UTLITY PLAN (WEST)
PD.2

TYPICAL SINGLE FAMILY WATER AND

SANITARY SEWER SERVICE DETAIL

KEY MAP

EXHIBIT B
737
3" 3" 3" DMA 1
DMA 2
DMA 3

LAS POSITAS ROAD

ARROYO VISTA
ST-1
ST-2
ST-3
ST-4 ST-5
ST-6
ST-8
ST-7

BIO-RETENTION AREA DETAIL

BIO-RETENTION DETAIL
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached - Tract # 8714 Livermore
June 11, 2024
0 60 120 180
LEGEND

STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN (WEST)
PD.3
DMA 1

ABBREVIATIONS

STORM WATER TREATMENT SUMMARY

DMA TOTAL
AREA

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

PERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

TREATMENT
AREA

REQUIRED (SF)

TREATMENT
AREA

PROVIDED
(SF)

TREATMENT
TYPE
A
RISER
HEIGHT
(FT)

OFFSITE TREATMENT SUMMARY

DMA TOTAL

AREA (SF)

IMPERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

PERVIOUS

AREA (SF)

TREATMENT
TYPE

ORIFICE SIZE (DRAIN HOLE

OPENING) SUMMARY

BR DIAMETER (INCHES)

EXHIBIT B
738
29 30 31 32 33 34 35
23 24 25 26 27 28
22 19 20
10 9
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
8 7
6 5
4 2
1 40
39 38
37 36
51 52 53 54 55
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
56 57 58 59
63 62
61 60
64 65 66 67
71 69 70
68 75 74 73
72 79
78 77
76 81 80
83 84
82 86 85
3 21

NOT A PART

PARCEL T

PARCEL U

PARCEL J
PARCEL I 97
121
101

PARCEL C VILANA STREET (PUBLIC STREET)

PARCEL D MARENGO LOOP
(PUBLIC STREET)

PARCEL A LAS POSITAS ROAD

ARROYO VISTA

PARCEL F ADORA LOOP PARCEL G

PARCEL H

PARCEL V
(PUBLIC STREET) VILANA STREET

PARCEL E

PARCEL W

PARCEL S

PARCEL X

PARCEL B ADORA LOOP

ADORA LOOP

ADORA LOOP ADORA LOOP I ALLEY

H ALLEY

PARCEL X

PARCEL W

NOT A PART
Trumark
3001 Bishop Drive, Suite 100, San Ramon, CA 94583
925.999.3956 373.015 Pell Property Single Family Detached - Tract # 8714 Livermore
June 11, 2024
0 50 100 150

KEY MAP

LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS

LOTTING PLAN (WEST)
PD-4
1 EXHIBIT B
739

EXHIBIT B
92 8 29
93 94
89 90 91 88 87 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 31 32 33 34 35 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 363738 3940 51 52 53 54 55 44 43 42 41 45 46 47 48 49 50
60 56

ARROYO VISTA
3' HIGH LOW FENCE & GATE, TYP.
6' HIGH NOISE BARRIER FENCE, TYP.

EXHIBIT B

S RD ARROYO VISTA RD
92 8 29
93 94
89 90 91 88 87 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 31 32 33 34 35 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 363738 3940 51 52 53 54 55 44 43 42 41 45 46 47 48 49 50
60 56

ARROYO VISTA

EXHIBIT B
3" 3" 3"
141 125 137 92 8 29 83
86 85
165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175
189 188 187 162 161 160
157 156 155
135 136 133 134 131 132 126 127 128 129 130 93 94 95 9689 90 91 88 87 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 30 31 32 33 34 35 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 363738 3940 120 104 105 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 100 999897 124 123 122 121 51 52 53 54 55 44 43 42 41 45 46 47 48 49 50 84 80 81 82 72 73 74 75 71 70 69 68 64 65 66 67 63 62 61 60 56 57 58 59 138 139 140 142 143 144 145 146 101 102 103 79 78 77 76 106

ARROYO VISTA RO
ARROYO SECO CHANNEL East P
West

EXHIBIT B

TYPICAL ABOVE-GROUND UTILITIES
DING EXTERIOR PER ARCH. PLANS

LOW WALLS MOUNTAIN LEDGE SHASTA WESTERN TO MATCH CLUBHOUSE STONE ARBOR AC

EXHIBIT B
ntalis Western Redbud STD 24"box 83 VL, N, P, 20' X 15' entensis Chitalpa 24"box 26 L, P, 30' X 30'
aniculata Golden Rain Tree 24"box 19 M, P, 30' X 30'
`Saratoga` Sweet Bay 24"box 29 L, P, 40' X 25'
diflora 'Samuel Sommer' Samuel Sommer Southern Magnolia 24"box 21 M, P, 35' X 30' diflora `Little Gem` Dwarf Magnolia 24"box 33 M, P, 25'X 15' mosa California Sycamore STD 24"box 4 M, N, 60' X 30'
ata `Amanogawa` Japanese Flowering Cherry 24"box 87 M, P, 25' X 8' olia Coast Live Oak 24"box 9 VL, N, 70' X 50'
African Sumac 24"box 20 L, P, 25' X 25'
rple Robe` Purple Robe Locust 24"box 8 L, P, 40' X 25'
na 'Elegant' Water Gum 24"box 79 M, P, 40' X 25'
ia `True Green` True Green Elm 24"box 14 M, P, 60' X 50' ntalis Western Redbud STD 24"box 83 VL, N, P, 20' X 15' entensis Chitalpa 24"box 26 L, P, 30' X 30'
aniculata Golden Rain Tree 24"box 19 M, P, 30' X 30'
`Saratoga` Sweet Bay 24"box 29 L, P, 40' X 25'
diflora 'Samuel Sommer' Samuel Sommer Southern Magnolia 24"box 21 M, P, 35' X 30' diflora `Little Gem` Dwarf Magnolia 24"box 33 M, P, 25'X 15' mosa California Sycamore STD 24"box 4 M, N, 60' X 30'
ata `Amanogawa` Japanese Flowering Cherry 24"box 87 M, P, 25' X 8' olia Coast Live Oak 24"box 9 VL, N, 70' X 50'
African Sumac 24"box 20 L, P, 25' X 25'
rple Robe` Purple Robe Locust 24"box 8 L, P, 40' X 25'
na 'Elegant' Water Gum 24"box 79 M, P, 40' X 25'
ia `True Green` True Green Elm 24"box 14 M, P, 60' X 50' Callistemon viminalis 'Little John' Little John Weeping Bottlebrush 5 gal Coprosma kirkii Creeping Mirror Plant 5 gal Coprosma kirkii 'Variegata' Creeping Mirror Plant 5 gal Dietes bicolor Fortnight Lily 5 gal Dietes grandiflora 'Variegata' Striped Fortnight Lily 5 gal Erigeron karvinskianus Santa Barbara Daisy 1 gal Euryops pectinatus 'Munchkin' Munchkin Golden Shrub Daisy 5 gal Euryops pectinatus 'Viridis' Green Golden Shrub Daisy 5 gal Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 1 gal Galvezia speciosa Island Snapdragon 5 gal Galvezia speciosa 'Firecracker' Firecracker Island Snapdragon 5 gal Grevillea x 'Noellii' Noel Grevillea 5 gal Juniperus scopulorum 'Medora' Medora Juniper 15 gal Lantana montevidensis Purple Trailing Lantana 1 gal Lantana x 'Chapel Hill Yellow' Chapel Hill Yellow Lantana 1 gal Lomandra longifolia 'Breeze' Breeze™ Mat Rush 1 gal Loropetalum chinense 'Shang-white' Emerald Snow® Loropetalum 5 gal

L, P LLL, P L, P L, N, P L, P L, P L, N L, N, P L, N, P L, P L, P L, P L, P L, P L, P Nandina domestica 'Compacta' Nandina domestica 'Gulf Stream' Nandina domestica 'Lemon-Lime' Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Little BPennisetum messiacum 'Red BunPhormium tenax 'Tiny Tiger' Phormium tenax 'Toney Tiger' Phormium x 'Duet' Phormium x 'Gold Sword' Pittosporum tobira 'Variegata' Rhaphiolepis indica 'Ballerina' Rhaphiolepis indica 'Clara' Rhaphiolepis indica 'Dancer' Salvia leucantha 'Santa Barbara' Santolina virens
Xylosma congestum 'Compacta'
ia ' True Green' True Green Elm 24"box 5 M, P, 60' X 50' Flowering Tree 24"box 6 L

NAME COMMON NAME CONT QTY WUCOLS

EXHIBIT B
ca Carpinus betulus fastigiata Cercis occidentalis Chitalpa tashkentensis Koelreuteria

EXHIBIT B

ON AREAS
m Aspidistra elatior Callistemon viminalis 'Little John' Coprosma kirkii 'Variegata' Dietes bicolor Erıgeron karvınskla ensis Loropetalum chinensis 'Shang-White' Nandina domestica 'Compacta' Pennisetum alop. 'Little Bunny' Phoriumum x 'Duet'

EXHIBIT B

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24- 001, Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002, Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002, and Planned Development (PD) 24-001
Hearing to consider the "Arroyo Vista" residential development Project on approximately 15 acres within the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood. The Project is to allow approximately 86 single family units in the northern portion of the west parcel to be increased to three stories in height and remove a pedestrian bridge that connects the east and west parcel. The project will provide new community amenities, including two pocket parks and financial contribution of $2,000,000 to the Community Benefit Fund and the Social Opportunity Endowment Fund.

Location: Southeast corner of Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road (APNs: 903-10-46 through 903-10-54)
Recommended by Planning Commission: July 16, 2024
Approved by City Council:

A. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION

1. The project shall be in conformance with all City Ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies except as set forth in the Project’s Development Agreement Amendment (“DAA”) Specific Plan Amendment (“SPPA”) (collectively, the “Project Approvals”). The conditions listed below are particularly pertinent to this permit and shall not be construed to permit violation of other laws and policies not so listed.

2. Approval is limited to conformance of the land uses allowed in Light Intensity Industrial, Open Space, and Urban High Residential (UH-3), in accordance with the Project Approvals. Use of the property shall be limited to those permitted by the Development Code and Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan as it exists now and pursuant to the Project Approvals, as the same may be amended in the future.

3. Site Plan Design Review Modification and all other project approvals shall expire 20 years from the effective date of the Development Agreement Amendment 24-001, pursuant to any time extensions in the Development Agreement.

B. PROJECT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
The applicant shall respond in writing to all conditions contained in this document and its attachments. Responses shall describe how the condition has been met and shall, where applicable, direct the plan checker to the page and/or drawing

EXHIBIT C
753
detail that demonstrates compliance with the condition. A copy of these responses shall be provided with each set of revised plans.

1. Prior to Final Map/Improvement Plan approval for the area covered by this amendment, applicant shall revise landscape plan to ensure 20 percent of all onsite trees have a 24-inch box size or larger, as approved by the Community Development Department Director.

2. Prior to Final Map/Improvement Plan approval for the area covered by this amendment, applicant shall revise landscape plan to ensure all shrubs shall have a minimum 5-gallon size, as approved by the Community Development Department Director.

3. Project shall conform to all required Mitigation Measures listed in the original IS/MND Addendums covering the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project (Attachment 3).

4. Prior to Final Map approval, a Photometrics plan for the pedestrian paths and parking surfaces shall be provided for review and approval by the Director.

5. Prior to Final Map approval, the applicant shall provide plan showing and installing a pedestrian path connecting the pocket park on the west site of the Arroyo Seco Channel trail as approved by the Director. The applicant will be responsible for grading in such a way that does not inhibit the feasibility of this design as the design will be finalized in the Final Map and Improvement Plan stage. The Community Development Director can waive this condition if construction of the pedestrian path becomes infeasible. (Added by Planning Commission: July 16, 2024)

6. Prior to the Final Map approval, the applicant shall design and provide two benches along the 5’ path to the west of the Arroyo Seco Channel trail. The Community Development Director can waive this condition of installation of the two benches becomes infeasible. (Added by Planning Commission: July 16, 2024)

7. Prior to the Final Map approval, the applicant shall provide plan that shows the air conditioning units to be screened with wood enclosures that exceed the height of the air conditioning units. In addition, the above ground utilities shall be screened with vegetation that exceeds the height of the above ground utilities.

8. Prior to the Final Map approval, the applicant shall demonstrate on landscape plan how the project complies with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.

9. Prior to the Final Map approval, the plans will show buffered bike lanes on Las Positas Road along the project frontage consistent with the approved 2017 Engineering Considerations.

10.The unit at the corner of Arroyo Vista and Las Positas (lot #1) shall provide enhanced design elements due to the prominence of the unit’s location. (Added by Planning Commission: July 16, 2024) C. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1. Development shall conform to the approved plans as shown in Exhibit B-1.

EXHIBIT C
754
Exhibit B-1 plans shall include but are not limited to subdivision, master landscape, and architectural plans reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council and amended by the applicant to reflect any changes indicated above in the Project Specific Conditions or required by the City in the approval process. The development impact fees (subject to annual increases) are vested with the Development Agreement.

2. The Community Development Department may approve minor amendments to the permit, provided that the permit is still in substantial conformance with the original approval and all requirements of Development Agreement Amendment 24-001.

3. Approval of the Site Plan Design Review Modification entitlement is not an authorization to commence construction. Building construction, alterations, repairs, sign erection, or occupancy shall not be permitted without prior approval of the Building Division through issuance of any required permits.

4. To the extent permitted by law, the project applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City Council, its officers, boards, commissions, employees and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void the approval of the project or any permit authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its attorney’s fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice.

D. ENGINEERING DIVISION

1. Development shall conform to the attached Engineering Considerations, dated June 3, 2024 (Attachment 1).

E. BUILDING DIVISION

1. Each project shall conform to CA codes adopted at time of project Building permit submittal.

2. Commercial spaces shall submit separate Tenant Improvement applications than the shell permits based on use.

3. Community pool shall submit separate plans for Alameda County Health approval in addition to City of Livermore approval.

F. FIRE DEPARTMENT
The Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building/civil drawings for conceptual on-site fire mains and fire hydrant locations only. Plan check comments and approval DO NOT include: 1.) Installation of the on-site fire mains and fire hydrants.

Specific installation drawings submitted by the licensed underground fire protection contractor shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for

EXHIBIT C
755
approval; and 2.) Backflow prevention or connections to the public water mains.

FIRE HAZARDS: The project developer shall keep the site free of fire hazards from the start of lumber construction until the final inspection.

1. FIRE CODE: All construction shall conform to the requirements of the 2022 Livermore Fire Code and local ordinances. All required permits shall be obtained prior to work commencement.

2. SITE SAFETY: Site safety during construction shall be in accordance with Fire Code chapter 33.

3. FIRE SPRINKLERS: Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in all occupancies in accordance with the 2022 Livermore Building, Fire and Residential Codes with local amendments and ordinances.

EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO: Emergency responder radio
coverage shall be provided in accordance with section 510 of the Fire Code.

4. FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: Prior to any construction framing, the applicant shall provide adequate fire protection facilities, including, but not limited to a water supply and water flow in conformance to the City's Fire Department Standards able to suppress a major fire.

5. WATER FLOW AND CONTROL VALVES: All fire sprinkler system water flow and control valves shall be complete and serviceable prior to final inspection. Prior to the occupancy of a building having a fire alarm system, the Fire Department shall test and witness the operation of the fire alarm system.

6. ELECTRICAL CONDUIT: Electrical conduit shall be provided to each fire protection system control valve including all valve(s) at the water connections. The Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department requires electronic supervision of all valves for automatic sprinkler systems and fire protection systems.

7. LISTED: All commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential occupancies shall have valve tamper and water flow connected to a listed Central Station Service in accordance with NFPA 72. Fire Department plan check includes specifications, monitoring, installation, and alarm company certificates. Fire alarm control panel and remote annunciation shall be at location(s) approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. All systems shall be point identified by individual device and annunciated by device type and point.

8. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Should any operation or business activity involve the use, storage or handling of hazardous materials, the firm shall be responsible for contacting the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department prior to commencing operations. Please contact the Hazardous Materials Coordinator at 925/454-2361.

EXHIBIT C
756

9. FIRE HYDRANTS: Fire hydrants shall be installed at spacing not greater than 300 feet in industrial and commercial developments. Fire hydrants shall be installed at spacing not greater than 400 feet in residential developments.

10. FIRE LANE MARKING: On-site access ways, turn arounds, and internal drives shall be designated as fire lanes and identified as such by red curb striping and posted with signs at locations approve by the Fire Department. Signs shall be according to State standards and read “No Parking – Fire Lane” and must be shown on the plans. The red curb striping, sign location(s), and sign language shall be included in the building permit submittal for review and approval by the LivermorePleasanton Fire Department prior to building permit issuance. a. The following schedule for NO PARKING signs shall apply:

Width Requirements
36 feet or greater No requirements
Between 28 and 36 feet Post one side
Between 20 and 28 feet Post both sides
Less than 20 feet Not permitted
Cul-de-Sac Not permitted

11. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROADS: Access roads shall have 13 feet, 6 inches unobstructed vertical clearance, 20 feet of unobstructed width (26 feet where occupied building floors exceed 30 feet height), and inside turning radius of 31 feet and outside turning radius of 51 feet. Unobstructed shall mean a clear travel way, excluding parking width, and designed for an emergency vehicle weight of 70,000 pounds under all weather conditions. Unobstructed width shall not include the width of rolled curbs, sidewalks, or non-drivable surfaces.

All exterior portions of buildings must be within 200 feet of an access road.

Yard and parking area may be able to be located farther than 200 feet from access roads, depending on the specific use. Project specific modifications to require access road widths are provided below:

1. Alleys D-G (Adora Loop) and Alley H will be 26' wide to provide aerial truck access to these units.

2. The units on Lots 56-86 will have a modified fire sprinkler system as approved by the Fire Marshal on 3/24/24. The Modified NFPA 13D Sprinkler system will include the following enhancements:
a. Sprinkler coverage on all porches and patios greater than 4';
b. Sprinkler coverage in all bathrooms and closets regardless of square footage;
c. 4 sprinkler hydraulic calculation (NFPA 13D requires up to

EXHIBIT C
757
2). Calculations to be performed at .05 density consistent with NFPA 13D;
d. Sprinklers throughout attic space above upper floor at 225 sq. ft. spacing.

12. PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Address numbers shall be installed on the front or primary entrance for all buildings. Minimum building address character size shall be 12-inch high by 1-inch stroke. In all cases address numerals shall be of contrasting background and clearly visible in accordance with the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Premises Identification Standards. This may warrant field verification and adjustments based upon topography, landscaping or other obstructions.

13. FINAL INSPECTION: Prior to request for final inspection, all access roads, on-site access and fire hydrants shall be provided. All fire hydrants shall be accepted, inspected and tested to applicable City Standards.

G. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
a. Development shall conform to the attached Zone 7
Conditions, dated May 23, 2024 (Attachment 2).

EXHIBIT C
758
Attachments:
1: Engineering Considerations
2: Water Resources Conditions
3: Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Initial Study Report Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program

EXHIBIT C
759

CITY OF LIVERMORE

ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS
Date: Jun 3, 2024
LOCATION: Las Positas Road and Arroyo Vista
DEVELOPER: TH Arroyo Vista LLC (Trumark)
PLANNING REFERRAL #: SPDRM24-002, DAA23-001
Note: Specific conditions are shown in large type. Standard conditionsthat apply to this project are shown in italic type.

1. DEFINITIONS:

For the purpose of this agreement, the following words shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:

Developer: Person(s) or Corporation(s) that will obtain permits for construction Improvement Plans: Construction drawings for required public and private improvements Services: Utility lateral, or any portions of a conduit cable or duct, between a utility distribution line and the site it serves
Project: Thework to be performed by Developer

2. SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION
A. The project shall be in conformance with all City Ordinances, rules, regulations, and policies. The conditions listed below are particularly pertinent to this permit and shall not be construed to permit violation of other laws and policies not so listed.

B. Approval or conditional approval of this SPDRM shall not supersede these Engineering Considerations and any applicable City Standards nor limit the City’s Engineer’s ability to require workable designs on future grading and improvement plans based upon these Engineering considerations and the City’s Standard engineering specifications and details.

3. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:

The Developer shall comply with the following conditions:
1 EXHIBIT C
760
A. This Project shall comply with all of the provisions of the following approved entitlements & recorded documents unless otherwise noted in these Engineering Considerations (collectively the "Approved Entitlements"):
• Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 8379 (SUB16-010)
• Planned Development (PD16-004)
• Site Plan Design Review (SPDR16-027)
• Development Agreement (DA17-002)
B. This Project shall comply with all of the provisions of the Development Agreement Amendment DAA24-001, including providing in-lieu fees for not providing the pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Seco as outlined in DAA24-001.

C. Final Tract Map 8379 (which has been recorded) shall be revised to include any revisions to easements necessary to comply with these Engineering Considerations and the Amended Development Agreement DAA24-001. This revised Final Map shall be reviewed and approved by City Council prior to the recordation.

D. The alley widths for Adora Loop and H Alley shall be 26’. All other streets shall remain per the Approved Entitlements.

E. Bridge construction over Arroyo Las Positas and related appurtenances and easements do not apply per Amended Development Agreement DAA24-001.

F. The existing Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Security Bond shall be amended (and recorded) to include any revisions necessary to comply with these Engineering Considerations and the Amended Development Agreement DAA24-001.

G. The existing Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Agreement shall be amended (and recorded) to include any revisions necessary to comply with these Engineering Considerations and the Amended Development Agreement DAA24-001.

H. Updated CC&R’s shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the recordation of the amended Final Map.

I. Developer shall remove references to the Zone 7 Aerial Easement and Service Easements related to the bridge as necessary to comply with these Engineering Considerations and the Amended Development Agreement DAA24-001. Developer shall also pay for any fees associated with quitclaiming the Zone 7 Aerial Easement.

JW:FL:MAP
2 EXHIBIT C
761
May 23, 2024
Kaitlyn Harrison, Assistant Planner
Planning Division
City of Livermore
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
Subject: Arroyo Vista (Pell) SFD Revision, SUB24-002
Southeast Las Positas Road and Arroyo Vista Intersection, Livermore, CA Zone 7 Referral No. 23-034C Rev
Dear Kaitlyn Harrison,
In response to your referral letter regarding the subject project, we offer the following comments:

Water Supply Facilities
There are no existing nor planned Zone 7 water supply facilities at this project site.

The scope of this review by Zone 7 does not include an analysis of potable water supply availability or source of sufficient water supply for the proposed project; the project proponent should coordinate with the appropriate water service provider (City of Livermore, City of Pleasanton, Dublin San Ramon Services District, or California Water Service Company) to identify availability and source of potable water supply for this development. If the proposed project includes the installation of water supply wells, please contact Zone 7 ([email protected]) for more information.

Groundwater Management
Wells - Our records indicate that there is one well (3S2E03Q003) in the project area (Figure 1) that must be protected or decommissioned. Please immediately notify Zone 7 if any other wells exist in the project area. All well locations should be field verified and noted on the plans.

Figure 1 also shows the approximate location of one destroyed well in the project area. No permit or notification is required for this well, however, please note that this well has likely

EXHIBIT C
762
been backfilled with cement and may be encountered during future grading activities. For additional information please email [email protected].

Also, please be advised that a Zone 7 drilling permit is needed for any water well or soil boring work that may be planned for this project. The drilling permit application and permit fee schedule can be downloaded from our website: https://www.zone7water.com/post/welldrilling-and-soil-boring-permits. For additional information please email [email protected].

It should be noted that the subject property (or project) is located within the basin area under sustainable groundwater management by Zone 7 as per the Alternative Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin and is subject to all relevant sustainable groundwater management actions.

Water-wise Landscaping - Zone 7 encourages the use of sustainable, climate-appropriate, and drought-tolerant plants, trees and grasses that thrive in the Tri-Valley area. Find more information at: http://www.trivalleywaterwise.com.

Flood Protection
Zone 7 has an existing Flood Protection facility, Arroyo Seco (Line P) at this location.

The developer had plans to construct a pedestrian bridge over the channel, which would have required an aerial easement. An aerial easement had been prepared for the City of Livermore and approved by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in January 2024. The developer has applied for an amendment with the City of Livermore to remove the bridge from the project’s scope of work. The developer would still be providing trail improvements on the west bank of the channel to meet the City’s requirements. The City had notified Zone 7 of the proposed bridge removal on May 21, 2024, and Zone 7 subsequently, is revising its comments to Referral 23-034C. Trail improvements and maintenance of the trail would still fall under the City’s responsibility under the existing Recreational Use License Agreement between Zone 7 and the City.

Developments creating new impervious areas within the Livermore-Amador Valley are subject to the assessment of the Development Impact Fee for Flood Protection and Storm Water Drainage. These fees are collected for Zone 7 by the local governing agency: 1) upon approval of the final map for public improvements creating new impervious areas and/or 2) upon issuance of a building or use permit required for site improvements creating new impervious areas. Fees are dependent on whether post-project impervious area conditions are greater than pre-project conditions.

EXHIBIT C
763
If you have any questions regarding comments from Flood Protection, please contact Jeff Tang at (925) 454-5075. If you have floodplain-related questions, such as whether the project is located within a natural floodplain, please contact the Floodplain manager at the City of Livermore.

In an effort to ensure that mailed notices and referrals from your agency make their way to the appropriate staff at Zone 7 in a timely manner, we are requesting that your databases/mailing lists are updated to reflect the following points of contact, specifically for routine development referrals and for CEQA / environmental reviews.

For CEQA / environmental review: For development review / referral:

Zone 7 Water Agency
Attn: CEQA Review / Elke Rank
100 North Canyons Parkway
Livermore, CA 94551
[email protected]
Staff contact:

Elke Rank, [email protected]
Zone 7 Water Agency
Attn: Dev Referral / Junming Li
100 North Canyons Parkway
Livermore, CA 94551
[email protected]
Staff contact:

Junming Li, [email protected]
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the person identified per section comments or me at (925) 454-5017.

Sincerely,
Junming Li
Assistant Engineer
Water Supply Engineering
Attachments:

Attachment 1 – Groundwater Maps, Figures 1
cc: Ken Minn, Water Resources Manager
Amanda Karchefski, [email protected]

EXHIBIT C
764
ca
C
N
ttj
O ~
O
c
z~
O -~
rn
O ~
Z
O
Z
Q
F- Z
L L
2~~ ~
fST
C
t6
Q
z O ( OE
Q H
cB ?
1 L ~
G
CC O ~ LL
Q~
0 Q
m
Z
a
W i
U UU
O O
O
L
N Q
L
O O
1 Q
U O
L -
N
C w- O m O .~ - C ttS > ~
Q O O~ O

O H N O
O
t~ ~ O
O ~
tN6
OMB
U O N,N OU O Um
A ~
O O U1 C O c tS3
p O N
O Z U O O N ~= ~ O N ~ ~ U N ~
F- cn V O J O~
O O O rn O O~
O ~
Q CO O to E
O ~ ~
C O •~
O m = ~
V
R
N
Y
A
O
O to
C O Y
O
L~
0 C `, Y'
O ~- ~ rO'
C Q L
0 0
0 '+
p C p
to d U tE
Q"
O Q QtB O
X
N
Q' "~ O ~ ( Q
N t4
E r' ~ (YS O ~ ~ ~
O
ft5 N

N N N N
O
cO~cO v o.r~~~ cu
V
N ( Q
O C
O L
C (~ C ~ V C L
4L 6
c
R5 N ,~. ~
L (
E
N
O ~
N ~
L O
O ~ ~
N '
C ~ ~
acu a O.«. a~a~°-oZ~O~ c i c
V
c
cu
O
U
U
su,
O~
Na~
L O N O~
a~tR
L C N to
ao~~' a
O
to
N
a'~
O ~
o Eon.

O
tE
to O O ~
N
O
O O
N O Rf Q.

O
O ~
N
Q
O p~ L
c
O to C
O U
Ip
a ~NN ~ O ~
Q
cu O
V ~ O'a ~M.

I
N
v v~
a
N
n..o~ o
c ,
v~`- Q- a`~
O
O
t O
L ~ U
vj
C p ~
N II N f6 = .
tB ~
Q
C Q ` ~'
N
c
N CO ~
Q ~ U c
fL6L ~ ~ O
o at=,~ N v~pcaa~ ai
Q
n"
fn ~ fA ~
U O
O O
C N O
N U
L~~ O~ N N -p ~
O
O
O Q N y-•
L
O -
a p. - ~ U ~ ~ V .~, ~ ~ ~
71 c SS
4- ~
y=+ ~fn to Q ~
tB O N fTf
C S C
CO
O
O ~ O tB
0 0
0 ~
O
4_- L
O O O ~
j ~ j ~ ~
t6
r`
t
L
O
t o 6
c
rn
Q
m
c
o. m
U (
Ev,°'
m
Q6 ~
C
C
1'- .a
C
C
O O O
O
O O OU
a a a ~
c o_ o_ Q. O ui
mmmUc
C
Q O O O~ U C
O O O O '~= in
w•
C 'C 'C ~ O
dd~0~
m
O
d U
E- f-t.~ mUd
0 c
N
o
N ~ ~
I
U ~ ~ U
O
o~. c~
D
ao
C
0 C
0 o~~,~ U
N O U'~ O
L O~
aT
LL
pa3Q>
mtim~~
OU
cam
m ~ ~ ~
o o~
o'
o
c>>~
U ~ J J Q
ZOmti
N
c
c
m
a
o
c
C6 O •?
c .`~
c
D c
u>
N »..

N ~
U O)
N ~ ~ d C
C O N ~ C
Q O)
N W. U ~
N
7 O ~ ~
0 LL m
c0 dW J
UUW~m
W
Z
Fr
r
Q
r
Lr
La

EXHIBIT C
765
C O~ ~~ O N
F,
Z U N
Z p 00 ~_.

I-O . Q C O p' ~O fO O
N
N
O ~ ~ ~
O ~ i
O
ch O O ~ N ~ .~ ~
O ~ ' O C ,~ ~ Q ~
to ~
N Q O ~ N v O N ~ ~ p
C c O~
O OQ ~ ~ -~ _ O N.+ ~ F-~ ~
Q ~ L W
AA''
4~ O ~
F ~
j
1-+ ~ ~
N
O
j
A` _
Z
C
O ~ ~
C
N .

U
O G O)
p
N
U
U
N
O ~ U tll ~ Q.

O V O =
C
N
V, O V ftf '~ ~ p > U '
O r O O
gy
N O
U O
U
N ~ N p ~ j - p
O L V!
I~ p
O ^ A
O '
v
O^~ N ii
U ii
C
U U O A\ ~
f•
J V
R ' VI's
U
I A V V!
O V
y~
u•
Lv'. ~
y/`~~ ~ 1`
T e
4si/ = L. ~ O V
Q .Q VL!
ii ~
T~~
W
W V~iJ
II\ ~ ~
V ~
A 4
O ~ a
s.. ~ V/ N ~-
Q O
v v~ Q V ~ ~ O N O ~ O O C
O O . p~ ~ tB Z •° Q .... tII ~.
o
o O ~ O to ~ ~
o C
o
C t0 tB U ~.~ ~
O
O
O i-.

Q" ~ ~ N C L ~ N-~.. ( 4 yO+ ~, N
O
O O ~ O ~ p
N U ~- C O~ p
O yam-. O (
B U C
t4 -~ ~
O
tB f6 -~
N ~ C M
O ' a ~ N N
O' C N ~ O
i= ~
O to M ~ i N Z .,.. cQ Q tCf C U lB ~ ~ to a' ~ fS5 C ( II U >i 'D c
a~
a
ca
c
a m
U
E~°~
m `-
N ~
C
N
N
U ~
O
O)
f6 _ ~ p ~
O
C ~ D)
O- w . Q ~
C ~

O O O O
O
O O O
U
m Q_ O_ Q. ~ ~
c
C Q.Q--O iq
camm
Uc
0 0 0 ~
o
C G
V
O O O O '~ iA
w
an.aoa
O
a U
I- t-timU~
m
r
v •~ N
o
N is •~ ~
U ~ ~ U
Z
Y $ '»
N
to s
U
G ' p
O
oo°~c
o~
o c~j
C C ~ C O
N ~ U'p
O
t
o~~
T~
catim~c
p ~Q>U
o o -
a
EE~ o~ ~ o
U~~~
m ~ > > ~
Q
O
O~ti
c
U~~~N
N
C
d
N
T
O
ca
C c •
U
o .? c
0 D ~ o
rna~~E
o
c
rna~mE°"
ca~a~
S
a~
o ca ~ c
Q rn
a~
aw ~o
W~i
Lm
o d
N J
0 UUO.
000
t.Lm
W
Z
r
N =
a
H
1-
Q
249

EXHIBIT C
766
25 O
r^'
VJ
YvJ ~
i
W U C
Y~
c~ ~
O N
N
O
O ~
p O O
aV.

O O
N ~ ~ N Ui
to C ( A ~
L.L
rn O ~--
I G N c :.:.

L
N N ~- - p p
V~
N
N ~
N
V U O Q~ N
O N
V~
O
U>
O
p~
O p
O Q
O
N p C
m O L"' U O O
O
C U
N
C
b
f6 H C , O
O fQ ~ t4 Q-,~
N y_ O
O O tSf
O C
N
N .~ ~ ~
O
vi N ~ O v~ O ~ ~ O
O
cb v ~ .O ~ N O
O ~ ~ ~
N N O Q ~
m Q.. C ~ O ~ m -
C ~ >+
O
O O
0 '
O ~
O
O ~ ~ -
p
O'_-+ N O E fA
N +-' O O~ U y0-_ ~:.. m O~ Q '
a N
C •~ ~ ~ ~ p O N ~ ~
N Rf ~ N ~ ~ (
6 O
cB
j
Q ~ ~ m~ ti ~ >, ~ cv N O O a p O~ U "O
O O p '''~ ~
O Q~~
C cq r= L O
U U
N ~ C.0 m Q ~[] Ll'•s:.

O C)~' pI-~ >Q Om.~pO
p
O ~
N ~
O N Q ~
p ca (~
U
U -p
O ~ C6 N ~ •~
Q.

O
c1T '
O
O ~ ~ N
p C N
O
O ~ u f
O
ca y ~ ~ C~
O ~ ~
O. ` "~ _
f0 ~
i V
O •
U ~
N o >~ O O
O O N 't-•! ~
O
O O
a
N
O "- O 1_+
N C C O U ~ _~
O V m
iT
m O
N > ~ O O
t~ L. >> C O
O O
O U V
U c~
U1 ~ ~ ftS ( Q C
N O ~
A ~ ~ ~ . a.+
O ~ ~
a-~ ( Q
c
rn
a
c~
c
a m
E ~
m
n °~
U (
E
O ~
C
t6
c
N - ' p
O
C
C C ~7 m
O

O O O O
O
C
O O O .`~ U
m a Q Q G ~
N
O y
a Q
f6 t6 G
O O O ~ U

C L L L C
O O O O 'L fA
L ~L ~ L ~ O
c
rn
O
U
1- 1- li m U
r
d
m
U `
N
O
n~ N ~ ~
Z ~
a~
o .`
C7 0 --
om~v~
C ~
a V ~
6 N '
O ~
L ~ ~ -
p OL
N ~
o cU
c ~
o~:-.
c o
N O U'p
O

O O-)LL
C.~~ AA
6 LL t6 ~ ~
Q
N ~ f6 O
Q.O. • Q ~
O
O ~ d
N
U
O O~
p ~
N N
Q ~C > > ~
U~~~ Q
C~~d~ ~ ti ti ~ -~
N
c
O
T
o
c
c •>
c
o.
m
y
o .-
p = N
D
rn
m E
c ~ ~~
c mc
o
i a
c~m^
N
c ~ p
Qo~
a
W V
O '-GN
O
D ~ O `~ O
0 0~ W 4. I.L m
N
0 J
m
UU~
Oo
tim
W
Z
r
M =
Q
Q

EXHIBIT C
767
r-+
O ~ ~N . ~ 0
C ~ O
O
U ....
9 :~
N 0
B O O ~
N E +-'
O
C ~ O
O N U C U •~ '~ = O O
O
H
C i Z' C ~ ~ ~
O N ~ ( Q O
t6
O O Q- ~ ~ ~
O ~
L O
0 rt+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~
O C
N~ O1NQ
C ~ .~ ~ ~
Y
Q. ~
C N v ~
L
Q. •Y ~ ~ ~ ~a' c6
L~
O
cq
y
G S 'a
p' .

C~ ~ O 4_
C LA ~ •
L O ~ U ~ .

N U N ~
LL ~
to ~ C ~ p ~ O U
O
U t0
N '~ ~ (
n ''"~ ~
O O ~ ~ O to O N
V
O ~
Q O
O O ': ~ ~ N ~ ~ "~-'
N c6 . Q ~ ~ ~ ~ O a i N O v
O ~ ~ ~ n ~ O
N
i ~
C (
6 U ~ ~ ~
O
U
O "O
0 ~
N ~
U
to
C i p)
C ; a- O v.-
O
C "O ~
O ~
O N ~
t. U ~ Q to
Q i
IO ~ O) U ~
O ;~ :~_. •
O ~'
C
t/1 y..

N ~ .

N C ~ ~ Ln t6 ~ C N
Q"~
O ~ .~ G ~' L C
N ~-+ ,F
O ~ N
O ~ ""' • N ~
z
O
cu = yO. -
a ~ ''~
N ~ N
N '~ ~
N O
O U ~
c ''"'
N C ~ V~ ~
N "''~ N U
O
C
O ~ ~~ O
t ~ *)
N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O ~ ; C V ~ ~ ~
O
N
O
N ( C0 4? ~ ~
O
Q ~
E E
O ~ ~ ~ ~
o fn O O U
N N ~
C ~ fSS O
C O O D U f4
U
Q N U t4 C N fTS t0
t fA fn 4- ~.+
v
c
m
a
m
c
a m m
y ~
U (n6
O
f0
O
C6
C
t6 . - O
O
C 3 ~
O
C

O O O O
C
O
U N f6 f0 O
rn

O O O U
Q.na~~ c aaao y
ca m caU c
C
O O O~ U c
O
v

O O O'C N
C O O
d ~ ~ ~ ~
C
O
U
F= tL m U d
c
a~
N
N y '
N ~
U ~ ~ U
7•_~ O+~ Z m ~_
C ~

0. U ~
ca O '
o ~
t6°~oc0c
o~;=,~ U
N ~
o
U'p ~
t
O ""~ LL
TT
Omtima~~cn~
o~
m~
O
a> ~
o -
a
f6
a~a~~
C > > ~
U ~ J J Q
u-~~
n-~
c
U~~~ N
C
O
c
d
t9
T
O
c .~
c t0 O •
N
rn
N E
0 c ~ ~ ~
C 6 ~ N n
c .~. m N D
cmp~-rn
N W U ~ ' a
O ~• 7
J
N
UUdu.-
0000
m
a
N
H
U
W
Z
N
r
251

EXHIBIT C
768
O
N N ~ C (~ Q.
c
p
cv a~
N C
a E ca
C C ~ + r
c.~
p Q ~ N ~ N L ;~ ~
O
N
t6 N tiT
p ~ Q N O ~ ~
O O ~
U U ~ ' a O to ~ _ ~
o ~ ~
t
y.. O ~ ~ ~ N tLf f4 C ~
O
N
C
0 ~ ~ ~
O ~
N .~
Q..~ ~
U ~(6 O
f6
N ~ U
i
E
O O ~ N CAC Q~ ~ V
I ~
L ~. O O ~••~
N N tQ N ~ ~ N -~ ~ N
U ~ O
O C VJ
O
C L ~~ N f1T
C L+ ~
Q O a .

L U.C C .y N ~ O
m N
N
p
r
O C C~ ~ ~ p
t6 O ~ •~
a ~
s..

N~ N pp
r
0 >+
O w `'
O O
O Q p'
U N N
0 fSf
O Q" ~ N Q Q- a ~ ~
t4 O C
CD ca c6 Z C,~ Q~ ~
C X (0
U Q U N m
dl
t~ >
N 4' ~ Q O ~ Q
5 2
c
rn
a
m
c
Ev,°'
c6
a ~
o
f°Ec
m
O
N
U ~
C
LA
f6 . ' p
O
C
O
C ~ ~
C
C

O O O O
C
O
6 l0 t6
U O
O•
O O ` `
U
cammUc
nano
Q O O O~ V
O
C
O O O '~ fA
C ' C '~ O O
d4.~~ d
E
m
O
a U
1- I-tLmU~
N
ti
O N ~
I
U ~ ~ U
C~Z~°
C fn
o~=
n' U ~
m ~-a~- O
o_f°~ co c U
c ~
p~+=
c O
N O U ~O ~
O
N -~ LL
TT
fl'
mtLmmc
N ~ f6
O
Q ~ V O y N
N
0 C~
O O-p
E E ~
o
a ~
m c > > ~
U~JJQ
t~iri~~
Z~~
c
U~~JN
O
d
tC
O
C
EC C •
j ~.

N
t0 O•-_
C
yp ~ ~
0 rn
a~ .. E
E ~ m 0
C Q
m
N
O
N ~
rn
c~pam
N W U
0 O
N •~
d I t m
o W
y J
m 000
2' U (.) ~ tL OD
W
z
h
r
ltd _
Q
H
Q

EXHIBIT C
769
c a ~
cu o
c~ a
U ~ '
v
N OL ~ ~
L
Q'{- ~
a o
c6 > `~°
Q..

E c
O :_.
a~ ~
m
m ~ m
C ~
w._°
c
N ~ ~ - ~ o
I- QH ~
c~
rn
4=~cc
0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 ~
m o.aac
mtam~
naa
jc
p a oooa,~
V
c ~ c
p
O O O O'er U~
v- ~~
n.~d
O
tl5
C ~ ~ ~
C v- ~ ~~~
U
O O O O.N t4 ~ H HIimU~
L O O
N ~ ~ O •O
N ,4? ~ ~ ~ j V to
v ~~~~
cn o.(~ ~ ~~ to
O
3 ~
c~ ^^`` ~
ca ~
Q W ~ ~ '
O ~ ~ ~ '^ ~ ~
V/
U L O
Q "
O C_ ~. N~ ,~
to Q. O t y p~~,
O E
v ~~ v
C C ~ tB ~ ~ O C.) "'.' t4 O
O ~ U '~ '~ 00
O _
t6 .,.. to U .

Q ` N
N ~ .+-, ~ .
o
ca =
D U ,Q ~ .~ Q O 0 0- O d ~ _~ fL6 C ~~~
v
O i
Q QL
t4 O C
N
cn
lB y~~ O
N '
X
to p .•-' +-' ..
t,f) C
z (
6 V O "
O N ~ o c U C ~ C ~:'~
C U O '~- C
O O N Rf . U ~
C
O~~ ~ c~ c o
N O ~
U Q U ~
T ~ ' U ~
0 ~ ~ •~ ~ , C ~_ U ~ N ~ U
0 a~
O
t6 ~ f0 ~ ~ ~ ~ . Q t~
Q ~
O ~
m ~ ~
c~OO~
Q V U~ J J Q
p N w'C.+ ~' ~ ~
C ~
O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N
C N.Q ~
to D~~~
c
O N O O C C U~~~N
Q~ ~V O,O U~
Q
L
i
U O O~ C N
U
O c
c
N
LZ.~. v_~ N O.

N cn E
p„~' ON. CO~
O c4 0.~ c
O O C>>
a '~~ ~ a~
ta+-' ~ O-O j,
p ~~ a~ ~
O O;~ ~N ~ ~ U
rnmcBE~ O. C~ .; 4 O
c C N Q~
O~~ O~ N'C-' C. m
c •o~ p
flrn Q to ~
C Q N
N O~
C
O O~
O
m n-W UU-a
C
Q. C
O ++
O) U ~ ~ ~ U O ~ ~~
y...

N ~ ~ ,~
C ~ C G ~
Z ~
IL m
N N N"
U L= ~ ~
0,,
O ~ L1J
O
O
H
f6 .O to ''-' ~
y D O J
O~~~ E U O N ~ U~d~ m
W
Z
co _
Q
H
Q
253

EXHIBIT C
770
ORDINANCE NO. _____

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT –
RESIDENTIAL (PD) 24-001 FOR THE ARROYO VISTA NEIGHBORHOOD

DEVELOPMENT, TO AMEND THE BRIDGE REQUIREMENT AND ALLOW FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN LIVERMORE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 16- 004
On July 24, 2017, the City of Livermore (“City”) approved an application from Summerhill LLC to develop the approximately 29-acre vacant parcel located at the southeast corner of the Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road intersection with a residential development project.

On January 25, 2024, the City received an application from TH Arroyo Vista LLC (“Applicant”) for Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002, Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24-001, Planned Development (PD) 24-001, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002 (collectively, the “Project”). The Project would modify the 2017 approval located southeast of the Las Positas and Arroyo Vista Road intersection. The Project includes modifying the design and height of the 86 single family residential units, adding approximately 0.5 acres of pocket parks in lieu of a pedestrian bridge, and making a financial contribution of $2 million dollars.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE DOES FIND AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recommendation. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2024, to consider Planned Development 24-001 to amend PD 16-004 and recommended that the City Council approve the Planned Development in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 2. Environmental. The City Council considered the environmental review and adopted the 2024 Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Addendum to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration [IS/MND] (State Clearinghouse No. 2007052028), as amended by the 2017 addendum, or the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project Addendum by Resolution ________.

Section 3. Consistency. The ordinance is consistent with the Livermore General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Livermore Development Code.

Section 4. Adoption. The City Council of the City of Livermore has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as part of this resolution, and based upon the City Council’s own independent review and considerations, the City Council hereby approves the Planned Development Residential zoning.
771
ORDINANCE NO. _____
Section 5. The zoning standards for this district shall be those set forth in the PD 24-001 Standards that amend PD 16-004, attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 6. Publication and Effective Date. This ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Livermore within 15 days after its adoption and shall take effect and be in force thirty days from and after its adoption.

Section 7. Filing. The Planning Manager is directed to file a Notice of Determination for the Arroyo Vista Addendum with the Alameda County Clerk.

Section 8. Documents. The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based on can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California.

Section 9. Severability. If any part of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any remaining parts.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Livermore held on September 9, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

The ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council held on ______________________, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________________
Mayor, City of Livermore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirrasou_____________ Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A - Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24
Exhibit B – Planned Development 24-001 Standards
772

EXHIBIT A
773

EXHIBIT A
774

EXHIBIT A
775

EXHIBIT A
776

EXHIBIT A
777

EXHIBIT A
778

EXHIBIT A
779

EXHIBIT A
780

EXHIBIT A
781

EXHIBIT A
782

EXHIBIT A
783

EXHIBIT A
784

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Planned Development Residential 16-004
Planned Development Residential 16-004 amended by Planned Development 24-001
Development of 435 residential units, two neighborhood parks, open space and recreational amenities, pedestrian pathways, landscaping, lighting, and streetscape improvements, and a pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Seco channel on the approximately 28.5-acre Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Site.

Location: North side of Las Positas Road between Arroyo Vista Drive and Bennett Drive, intersected by the Arroyo Seco Channel.

Recommended for Approval by the Planning Commission: June 20, 2017 Approved by City Council: July 24, 2017
Recommended for Amendment by the Planning Commission: July 16, 2024 Amended by City Council: September 9, 2024
[Note to reviewer: Between the Planning Commission July 16, 2024 and City Council September 9, 2024 public hearings, staff has clarified that Planned Development 24-001 is an amendment to Planned Development 16-004, as reflected in this record.]
A. PURPOSE AND INTENT

1. The purpose of establishing this Planned Development District is to regulate the development of 28.5+/- acres of land located on the north side of Las Positas Road between Arroyo Vista Road and Bennett Drive, intersected by the Arroyo Seco Channel subdivided by Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8379 generally shown in Exhibit A.

2. The intent of this Planned Development District is to accomplish the following:
a) To implement the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan.
b) To establish a comprehensively planned traditional neighborhood development that incorporates a pedestrian-oriented network of open space and walkways, high-quality architectural details, and adequate provision of public services and safety.
c) To provide an aesthetically attractive environment for and conducive to the development and protection of residential development.
d) To allow flexible subdivision design and development that encourages a variety of lot sizes and housing types that will accommodate a diverse range of residents and household income levels.
e) To provide parks, trails, and open space for the recreational use and enjoyment of neighborhood residents.

EXHIBIT B
785
B. PRINCIPAL PERMITTED USES
The following are the principal permitted uses in this District:

1. Detached single-family dwellings on individual lots.

2. Attached single-family dwellings on individual lots (i.e., townhomes).

3. Attached multi-family dwellings subdivided as condominiums (i.e., flats).

C. ACCESSORY USES
The following are the accessory uses permitted in this District:

1. Community parks, open spaces, and recreational amenities, including but not limited to: pathways, gardens, playgrounds, club houses/community buildings, outdoor seating and kitchen areas, pools, and cabanas.

2. Home Occupation in accordance with Livermore Development Code 6.02.060.

3. Accessory structures and buildings related to any permitted use, except home occupations, in accordance with Livermore Development Code

4.02.030.

4. Signs in accordance with Livermore Development Code 4.06.240 or 4.06.250.

Monument features at the entries to the neighborhood and paseos, consistent with the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan, are allowed. The name of community shall not be included on monument entry features.

D. CONDITIONAL USES
The following uses are permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit in addition to any other prerequisite permits and conformance to all applicable regulations set forth in this Planned Development and elsewhere in the Zoning Ordinance:

1. Public and Quasi-Public uses, not listed in Section C above, in accordance with Livermore Development Code 6.02.090.

2. Once the TDC option is used on any parcel within the Neighborhood Plan area, any future proposal to develop at the baseline industrial designation on any parcel would require discretionary approval of a Conditional Use Permit.

E. RESTRICTIONS

1. Building additions that result in net new floor area are prohibited.

EXHIBIT B
786
a) Minor building extensions such as chimneys and bay windows are allowed up to the maximum building height. Uncovered porches or decks no more than 18 inches in height are also allowed, although these features may not encroach into the required front or side yard setbacks.
b) Exceptions to this regulation will require a PD Amendment under the requirements of Chapter 9.14 of the Livermore Development Code.

2. Garage conversions into dwelling units or living space are prohibited.

3. Mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units, antennas, or ground-mounted satellite dishes, not originally constructed, are prohibited unless concealed or not visible from adjacent properties. Wall-mounted satellite dishes less than 24 inches in diameter are allowed.

4. Solar energy systems that meet the following criteria shall be allowed with a Building Permit:
a) Any such system must be consistent with the design and architecture of the residential unit or structure to which it is adjacent or affixed. b) The location of the system must not cause glare or visual distraction to surrounding properties in the project.
c) The materials used to support or surround the system must be compatible with the nature and color of the adjacent structures.

F. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL LOTS

1. Definition of setbacks. “Front” is defined as the side of the dwelling unit where the main entry is located. “Side” is defined as the side of the dwelling unit where there is either no access to the unit or the access to the unit is secondary. Setbacks are measured from the inside edge of the sidewalk (along a street) or pathway (along a paseo) to the wall plane, unless otherwise noted. Paseos are defined as landscaped corridors with a minimum 4-foot wide pathway, not located along a street.

2. Encroachments into yards. Certain architectural features including fireplaces, media niches and bay windows may encroach into the front, side, and rear yards up to a maximum of 3 feet in depth with a maximum width of 10 feet.

3. Encroachments into setbacks on curvilinear streets. Encroachments may be permitted per Section 4.1.4.2 of the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan.

4. Encroachments into arroyo setback. The end unit of the residential building located in the southwestern corner of the eastern portion of the site (located on lot 301 of the Tentative Tract Map) may encroach by up to 10 feet into the 30-foot setback from the property line with the Arroyo Seco flood control channel.

EXHIBIT B
787
G. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR DETACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS

1. Lot Specifications. Lots for single-family detached residences created under the terms of this Planned Development District shall conform to the following:
a) Minimum Lot Size: 2,150± square feet.
b) Average Lot Size: 2,600± square feet.
c) Maximum Lot Size: 4,790± square feet.
d) Lot Width: Minimum 32 feet
e) Corner Lot Width: Minimum 38 feet

2. Building Height Maximum. 45 35 feet and three two stories of livable area

3. Minimum Setbacks.
a) Front Porch at Street: 7 feet
b) Front Porch at Paseo: 5 feet
c) Front Wall Plane at Street: 13 feet
d) Front Wall Plane at Paseo: 7.6 feet
e) Side Yard Along Street: 6 feet
f) Side Yard Along Alley: 5 feet
g) Side Yard Along Paseo: 5 feet
h) Side Yard Separation (Building to Building): 10 feet i) Building Face to Building Face: 32 feet
j) Garage Face to Face of Curb Along an Alley: 6 feet
k) Garage Face to Garage Face Along an Alley: 32 feet
l) Building Face to Arroyo Seco Channel Right-of-Way: 30 feet H. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL LOTS

1. Lot Specifications (Townhomes). Lots for attached single-family residences created under the terms of this Planned Development District shall conform to the following:

EXHIBIT B
788
a) Minimum Lot Size: 1,000 square feet.
b) Average Lot Size: 1,600 ± square feet.
c) Maximum Lot Size: 3,600 square feet.

2. Lot Specifications (Flats). Lots for multi-family residences created under the terms of this Planned Development District shall conform to the following:
a) Minimum Lot Size: 7,100 square feet.
b) Average Lot Size: 8,900 ± square feet.
c) Maximum Lot Size: 9,700 square feet.

3. Building Height Maximum. 45 feet and 3 Stories of livable area.

4. Minimum Setbacks.
a) Front Porch at Street: 7 feet
b) Front Wall Plane at Street: 15 feet
c) Building Side to Building Side – No Pathway: 12 feet d) Building Side to Building Side – With Pathway: 15 feet e) Porch / Courtyard Separation at Paseos: 15 feet
f) Garage Face to Garage Face Along Alley: 32 feet
g) Building Face to Arroyo Seco Channel Right-of-Way: 30 feet

5. Average Setbacks. Building Face to Building Face along Paseos: 34 feet (average for each paired building cluster)
I. PARKING

1. Detached dwellings: Minimum 2 car garage with 1 guest space per unit.

2. Attached/multi-family dwellings: Minimum 2 car garage with 0.25 guest spaces per unit.

J. OPEN SPACE

1. Parks: Minimum of one neighborhood park with a minimum size of 0.20 acres on each side of the Arroyo Seco Channel.

EXHIBIT B
789

2. Single Family: No minimum. The Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan assumes each lot incorporates private open space as defined by the minimum building setbacks. a) Porches shall be minimum of 7 feet in either dimension.

3. Multi-Family: Minimum 1,000 square feet per unit spread out among three types of open space as follows:
a) Private Open Space (porches, decks, and courtyards for the exclusive use of private dwelling, with minimum of 7 feet in both dimensions): 10%-30%.
b) Semi-Private Open Space (outdoor areas between porches and sidewalks and between buildings and drive aisles): 20%-35% c) Common Open Space (useable spaces such as neighborhood parks, gardens, and paseos): 40%-60%.

4. Width of a Paseo: Minimum 15 feet.

K. REVIEW PROCESS

1. Residential development covered by this Planned Development is subject to the Transfer of Development Credit (TDC) Ordinance and fees.

2. Before a building permit is issued for any new structure, or a grading permit for grading, the property owner shall obtain Site Plan and Design Review approval under Part 9 of the Livermore Development Code. The site plan approval for property within this PD-R district may include development conditions not limited to building design and arrangement, circulation, access, lighting, fencing, landscaping and screening, and maintenance of common area.

3. Minor changes to the site plan and architectural and landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by City staff if they are determined to be in substantial conformance with the approved plans and are consistent with the intent of this Planned Development and the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan.

4. A variance to the terms of this Planned Development may be approved by the Planning Commission subject to the requirements of Chapter 9.10 of the Livermore Development Code.

EXHIBIT B
790
ORDINANCE NO. ______

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (DAA) 24-001 WITH TH ARROYO VISTA LLC, FOR THE ARROYO VISTA

NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT, TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL CERTAINTY FOR THE

APPLICANT AND SECURE COMMUNITY BENEFITS FOR THE CITY OF

LIVERMORE
California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (implemented by Livermore Development Code Chapter 9.04) allows local jurisdictions and private parties to enter into Development Agreements in order to vest certain development rights and to meet local public purpose.

In December 2016, the City of Livermore (“City”) received an application from SummerHill Livermore LLC to develop the approximately 29-acre vacant parcel located at the southeast corner of the Arroyo Vista and Las Positas Road intersection with a residential development project.

On July 24, 2017, SummerHill Livermore LLC and the City of Livermore entered into a Development Agreement (DA) 17-002 and recorded as Document No. 2017251014 in the Official Records of Alameda County.

On January 25, 2024, the City received an amended application from the Applicant for approximately 15-acres of the site that is currently being graded to allow construction of the residential buildings that are not subject to this amendment. The applications for the modified Project include Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002, Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24-001, Planned Development (PD) 24-001, and Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002 (collectively, the “Project”). The modified Project would remove the bridge requirement due to it becoming infeasible. Additionally, the modified Project would allow for taller homes of up to 45 feet and 3 stories that meet current market demands. The modified Project would develop at the intersection of southeast of Las Positas and Arroyo Vista Road, consistent with the 2017 approval. The Project includes 86 residential units, amenity space, two approximately 1.5-acre neighborhood parks with an additional approximately 0.5 acres of pocket parks, street improvements, street trees, and utility infrastructure. The residential units consist of for sale detached single-family homes. The Project also includes a Development Agreement Amendment (the “Development Agreement Amendment”) between the City and Developer, and Neighborhood Plan amendments.
791
ORDINANCE NO. ______

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE DOES FIND AND ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Authority. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65864 et seq., the City Council considers that certain document under City Application No.

Development Agreement Amendment 24-001 for the Arroyo Vista Residential Project.

The Development Agreement Amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 2. Recommendation. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2024, to consider adoption of an ordinance approving the Development Agreement Amendment and by its Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommended that the City Council adopt the ordinance and approve the Development Agreement Amendment.

Section 3. Public Hearing. Prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the City of Livermore reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony; and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Ordinance by reference.

Section 4. Environmental Review. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. [_________] adopting the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Project Addendum to the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration [IS/MND] (State Clearinghouse No. 2007052028), as amended by the 2017 addendum, and finding that no subsequent or supplemental IS/MND is required, under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) per CEQA Guidelines section 15162.

Section 5. Consistency. Development Agreement Amendment 24-001 is consistent with the General Plan and the Livermore Development Code Chapter 9.04.

Section 6. Findings and Approval. The City Council has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 25-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them herein, and based upon the City Council’s own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, it adopts this Ordinance approving the Development Agreement Amendment.

Section 7. Signing Authority. The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign the Development Agreement Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit B, on behalf of the City of Livermore.

Section 8. Publication and Effective Date. This ordinance or a comprehensive summary thereof shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation of the City of Livermore within 15 days after its adoption and shall take effect and be in force 30 days from and after its adoption.
792
ORDINANCE NO. ______
Section 9. Filing. The Planning Manager is directed to file a Notice of Determination for the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Addendum with the Alameda County Clerk.

Section 10. Recording. The City Clerk is directed to record the Development Agreement Amendment within 10 days after the effective date of the Development Agreement Amendment.

Section 11. Documents. The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based on can be found in the City Clerk’s Office, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, California.

Section 12. Severability. If any part of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid by a court, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any remaining parts.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Livermore held on September 9, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

The ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council held on ______________________, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________________
Mayor, City of Livermore
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
Acting City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution 25-24
Exhibit B – Development Agreement Amendment
793

EXHIBIT A
794

EXHIBIT A
795

EXHIBIT A
796

EXHIBIT A
797

EXHIBIT A
798

EXHIBIT A
799

EXHIBIT A
800

EXHIBIT A
801

EXHIBIT A
802

EXHIBIT A
803

EXHIBIT A
804

EXHIBIT A
805

EXHIBIT B
806

EXHIBIT B
807

EXHIBIT B
808

EXHIBIT B
809

EXHIBIT B
810

EXHIBIT B
811

EXHIBIT B
812
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 7.1
DATE: September 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marianna Marysheva, City Manager
SUBJECT: Designation of voting delegate and alternates for the 2024 League of California Cities General Assembly.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council appoint one voting delegate and up to two alternates to represent the City of Livermore at the 2024 League of California Cities General Assembly.

SUMMARY
Each year the League of California Cities (“League”) holds a General Assembly where League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote during the General Assembly, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates.

DISCUSSION
The League of California Cities is an association of California city officials who work together to shape policies affecting local government. The League’s Annual Conference is scheduled for October 16-18, 2024, at the Long Beach Convention Center, including the General Assembly on October 18, 2024. At the General Assembly, cities will vote on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote on behalf of the City of Livermore during the General Assembly, the City Council must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates, one of whom may vote in the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. This action must be taken by the City Council and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager.

The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the League’s Annual Conference (either the entire conference or October 18th only). To cast the City’s vote, the delegate or alternate must have in their possession the City’s voting card and voting tool, and be registered with the League’s Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates.

After the delegate and alternates have been designated by the City Council, staff will submit the online 813
Voting Delegate Form to the League by the deadline of September 25, 2024.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
There are no fiscal and administrative impacts associated with the designation of a voting delegate and alternates.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
5: A City That Works
GOAL
3: Federal and State Advocacy

ATTACHMENTS

1. 2024 Cal Cities Voting Delegate Information Packet
Prepared by: Debbie Elam
Acting City Clerk
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
814
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org DATE: Wednesday, July 10, 2024
TO: Mayors, Council Members, City Clerks, and City Managers RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES
League of California Cities Annual Conference and Expo, Oct. 16-18, 2024 Long Beach Convention Center
Every year, the League of California Cities convenes a member-driven General Assembly at the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo. The General Assembly is an important opportunity where city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy.

Taking place on Oct. 18, the General Assembly is comprised of voting delegates appointed by each member city; every city has one voting delegate. Your appointed voting delegate plays an important role during the General Assembly by representing your city and voting on resolutions.

To cast a vote during the General Assembly, your city must designate a voting delegate and up to two alternate voting delegates, one of whom may vote if the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity. Voting delegates may either be an elected or appointed official.

Action by Council Required. Consistent with Cal Cities bylaws, a city’s voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot be accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone.

Following council action, please submit your city’s delegates through the online submission portal by Wed., Sept. 25. When completing the Voting Delegate submission form, you will be asked to attest that council action was taken. You will need to be signed in to your My Cal Cities account when submitting the form.

Submitting your voting delegate form by the deadline will allow us time to establish voting delegate/alternate records prior to the conference and provide pre-conference communications with voting delegates.

Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. They need not register for the entire conference; they may register for Friday only. Conference registration is open on the Cal Cities website.

Council Action Advised by September 25, 2024
ATTACHMENT 1
815
For a city to cast a vote, one voter must be present at the General Assembly and in possession of the voting delegate card and voting tool. Voting delegates and alternates need to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting delegate card at the voting delegate desk. This will enable them to receive the special sticker on their name badges that will admit the voting delegate into the voting area during the General Assembly.

Please view Cal Cities’ event and meeting policy in advance of the conference.

Transferring Voting Card to Non-Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting delegate card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the General Assembly, they may not transfer the voting card to another city official.

Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

The voting delegate desk, located in the conference registration area of the Long Beach Convention Center in Long Beach, will be open at the following times: Wednesday, Oct. 16, 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m. and Thursday, Oct. 17, 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m. On Friday, Oct. 18, the voting delegate desk will be open at the General Assembly, starting at 7:30 a.m., but will be closed during roll calls and voting.

The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo.

Please share these procedures and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals that your council designates as your city’s voting delegate and alternates.

Once again, thank you for submitting your voting delegate and alternates by Wednesday, Sept. 25. If you have questions, please contact Zach Seals at [email protected].

Attachments:
• General Assembly Voting Guidelines
• Information Sheet: Cal Cities Resolutions and the General Assembly ATTACHMENT 1
816
1400 K Street, Suite 400, Sacramento, CA 95814 • 916.658.8200 • calcities.org General Assembly Voting Guidelines

1. One City One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to Cal Cities policy.

2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Cal Cities Annual Conference and Expo, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the voting delegate form provided to the Cal Cities Credentials Committee.

3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegate desk in the conference registration area. Voting delegates and alternates must sign in at the voting delegate desk. Here they will receive a special sticker on their name badge and thus be admitted to the voting area at the General Assembly.

4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates), and who have picked up their city’s voting card by providing a signature to the credentials committee at the voting delegate desk, may sign petitions to initiate a resolution.

5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in their possession the city's voting card and voting tool; and be registered with the credentials committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates but may not be transferred to another city official who is neither a voting delegate nor alternate.

6. Voting Area at General Assembly. At the General Assembly, individuals with a voting card will sit in a designated area. Admission to the voting area will be limited to the individual in possession of the voting card and with a special sticker on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate.

7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the credentials committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the General Assembly.

ATTACHMENT 1
817
Sixty days before the
Annual Conference
and Expo, Cal Cities
members may submit
policy proposals on
issues of importance
to cities. The resolution must
have the concurrence of at least
five additional member cities or
individual members.

How it works: Cal Cities
Resolutions and the General Assembly
General Assembly
General Resolutions Policy Committees
Developing League of California Cities policy is a dynamic process that engages a wide range of members to ensure Cal Cities represents cities with one voice. These policies directly guide Cal Cities’ advocacy to promote local decision-making, and lobby against statewide policies that erode local control.

The resolutions process and General Assembly is one way that city officials can directly participate in the development of Cal Cities policy. If a resolution is approved at the General Assembly, it becomes official Cal Cities policy. Here’s how resolutions and the General Assembly work.

The petitioned
resolution is an
alternate method
to introduce policy
proposals during
the annual conference. The
petition must be signed by
voting delegates from 10% of
member cities, and submitted to
the Cal Cities President at least
24 hours before the beginning
of the General Assembly.

Petitioned Resolutions
The Cal Cities
President assigns
general resolutions
to policy committees
where members
review, debate, and recommend
positions for each policy proposal.

Recommendations are forwarded
to the Resolutions Committee.

Who’s who
The Resolutions Committee
includes representatives
from each Cal Cities
diversity caucus, regional
division, municipal
department, and policy
committee, as well as
individuals appointed by
the Cal Cities president.

Voting delegates
are appointed by each
member city; every city
has one voting delegate.

The General Assembly is a
meeting of the collective
body of all voting
delegates —one from
every member city.

Seven policy committees
meet throughout the year
to review and recommend
positions to take on bills
and regulatory proposals.

Policy committees include
members from each Cal
Cities diversity caucus,
regional division, and
municipal department,
as well as individuals
appointed by the Cal
Cities president.

During the General Assembly, voting delegates
debate and consider general and petitioned
resolutions forwarded by the Resolutions
Committee. Potential Cal Cities bylaws
amendments are also considered at this meeting.

Cal Cities policy
development is a memberinformed process,
grounded in the voices and
experiences of city officials
throughout the state.

For more information visit www.calcities.org/general-assembly Prior to the Annual Conference and Expo
Resolutions Committee
The Resolutions
Committee considers
all resolutions. General
Resolutions approved1 by
either a policy committee
or the Resolutions Committee are next
considered by the General Assembly.

General resolutions not approved, or
referred for further study by both a
policy committee and the Resolutions
Committee do not go to the General
Assembly. All Petitioned Resolutions
are considered by the General
Assembly, unless disqualified.2
During the Annual Conference and Expo
1 The Resolution Committee can amend a general resolution prior to sending it to the General Assembly. 2 Petitioned Resolutions may be disqualified by the Resolutions Committee according to Cal Cities Bylaws Article VI. Sec. 5(f).

ATTACHMENT 1
818
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 10.1

4.0 Open Forum
Material: Public Comment

6.1 Hearing to receive and consider protests related to the annual fire hazard abatement program and confirm the 2024 Weed Abatement Program assessments for collection on the County Assessor tax roll.

Material: PowerPoint Presentation

6.2 Hearing to consider a request for a Specific Plan Amendment, Planned Development, Site Plan Design Review Modification, and Development Agreement Amendment to modify the 2017 approval for the Arroyo Vista Residential Project to increase the height of the single family detached units from two stories to three stories, remove a pedestrian bridge requirement, and secure community benefits including pocket parks and a financial contribution.

Material: PowerPoint Presentation

7.1 Designation of voting delegate and alternates for the 2024 League of California Cities General Assembly.

Material: PowerPoint Presentation

8.0 Council Committee Reports and Matters Initiated by City Manager, City Attorney, Staff, and Council Members.

Material: Council Reports
DATE: September 9, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Marianna Marysheva, City Manager
SUBJECT: Supplemental materials received prior to the meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

SUMMARY
These materials were posted online and made available to the public at the same time that they were distributed to the City Council.
819

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS

1. Supplemental Materials
Prepared by: Helena Graves
Deputy City Clerk
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
820
1 Helena Graves
From: Dawn W
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2024 9:58 AM
To: City Clerk
Subject: Save the trees!
Exercise CauƟon: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or aƩachments from untrusted sources.

Hello I am wriƟng in today to talk about the trees in Livermore. I am hoping this will be brought up as a complaint at the city meeƟng.

We have an infested ash tree next door that is falling apart. Every wind storm a branch falls off of it. Two weekends ago another big branch snapped off and is hanging by a thread now- and there wasn’t any wind that day! It is right on the sidewalk on the corner of Pestana and Estates and the home address is Estates st. I have wriƩen on the 311 site and last week on Tuesday I spoke with someone at the city offices regarding this as well. Nothing has happened. The tree is sƟll there with its branches falling everywhere. This is so dangerous for those walking to school and back and the mulƟple people I see walking underneath it with their babies, and pets. Also cars driving underneath it are at risk as well.

I put up some caƟon tape around the fallen branch, but would be nice if the city came along and roped off the area.

Not only are these trees a danger- they also infest other trees around them. Livermore has a HUGE problem with mistletoe infesƟng our trees. Many Ɵmes they infest trees that have been trimmed wrongly over the years which brings up my next concern- seems anyone these days are calling themselves “tree trimmers”. What can the city do to curb these unqualified businesses that say they are qualified to do the job? I see them daily in our neighborhood butchering trees.

The trees get stressed out aŌer being hacked and then that opens up the door for mistletoe and other pests to eat away at that tree and then kill it. All the while infesƟng other trees in the neighborhood. Please what can the city do to help educate the ciƟzens regarding tree trimming and tree removals?! This house at Estates st and hasn’t had the home owners or anyone else living in it for over 4 months. Seems they are geƫng a renovaƟon on the whole house, but yet won’t take care of their trees. We are fed up as neighbors. Please have someone take a look at this tree and help us to get it taken down.

Thank you,
Dawn Wantroba
Sent from my iPhone
Item 4.0
Public Comment
821
Item 6.1
PowerPoint Presentation
822
Item 6.1
PowerPoint Presentation
823
1 Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002, Planned Development (PD) 24- 001, Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24-002, and Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24-001
September 9, 2024
Kaitlyn Harrison, Assistant Planner
Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan
Residential Project Amendment
Site Context and Existing
Conditions
A C
B
A
B
C
1 2
Item 6.2
PowerPoint Presentation
824
2 Background
Modified Project Description
o Proposes single family
building heights of 34-37’ and
3 stories o Removes the pedestrian
bridge requirement o Provides 2 pocket parks o Provides enhanced pedestrian connectivity o Provides a financial
contribution
3 4
Item 6.2
PowerPoint Presentation
825
3 Architecture and Design
Modified Project - Pocket Parks
5 6
Item 6.2
PowerPoint Presentation
826
4 Planning Commission Modifications
o Enhancements to the
street side elevation of
corner unit at Arroyo Vista
and Las Positas
o Authorizing for the
Community
Development Director to
waive two conditions if
infeasible
Summary
Planning Commission and Staff support the proposed bridge removal modification:
• Pocket parks create additional open space
• Two additional pathways
• New amenities such as additional benches
• Contribution of $2 million to the Community Benefit Fund and Social Endowment Opportunity Fund
7 8
Item 6.2
PowerPoint Presentation
827
5 Recommendation
The Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council take the following actions: o Adopt a resolution certifying the 2024 addendum to the Arroyo Vista Neighborhood Plan Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration, as amended, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15162(a)(3); o Adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan Amendment (SPPA) 24-002 o Adopt a resolution approving Site Plan Design Review Modification (SPDRM) 24- 002; subject to the Conditions of Approval o Introduce an ordinance and waive the first reading authorizing execution of Planned Development Amendment (PD) 24-001 o Introduce an ordinance and waive the first reading authorizing execution of Development Agreement Amendment (DAA) 24-001 o Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.
9 Item 6.2
PowerPoint Presentation
828
Item 7.1
PowerPoint Presentation
829
Council Member
Date of Meeting
or Event Committee or Organization
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting) Summary of Meeting or Event
Mayor Marchand 7/24/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Board meeting Approved monthly financials and provided City
update
Mayor Marchand 7/25/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Wine Country Series Program on career goals, "Careers by choice not
by chance"
Mayor Marchand 7/25/2024 Alameda Country Transportation Commission (ACTC) Commission meeting Program updates, currently ACTC is managing 3/4
of a billion dollars in projects.

Mayor Marchand 7/27/2024 Little League Intermediate World Series Opening Ceremonies Attended and spoke at the Opening Ceremonies Mayor Marchand 7/30/2024 City of Livermore
Livermore-Pleasanton City Council Liaison
Meeting Discussed airport issues and complaints.

Mayor Marchand 7/31/2024 Cit of Livermore/Congressman Swalwell Cyberfraud seminar Provided guidance to avoid becoming a victim.

Mayor Marchand 8/1/2024 City of Livermore TV30 Mayor's Report Provided a City update.

Mayor Marchand 8/1/2024 City of Livermore Internship Commencement Attended and spoke at event.

Mayor Marchand 8/1/2024 Lawrence Livermore Lab Foundation Poster sessions from student participants Attended and spoke with students about their
projects.

Mayor Marchand 8/3/2024 Tri-Valley Non Profit Alliance (TVNPA) Salud y Sol Community event at May Nissen
park
Many nonprofits participated and over 1,100
local residents benefited.

Mayor Marchand 8/6/2024 City of Livermore National Night Out Attended 7 neighborhood events, speaking with
community members about neighborhood safety.

Mayor Marchand 8/7/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Business Alliance meeting Provided City update and heard a presentation
on the Livermore Wine Community.

Mayor Marchand 8/8/2024 Real Estate Alliance of Livermore Information exchange Provided an update from the City and answered
questions
Mayor Marchand 8/8/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Ribbon-cutting Ribbon-cutting for Got Scoopz? Provided a
Certificate of Welcome
Mayor Marchand 8/10/2024 Livermore Masons Community gathering Talked about a future litter abatement program.

Mayor Marchand 8/14/2024 California Water Service Training Emergency preparedness training SEMS/NIMS Mayor Marchand 8/15/2024 City of Livermore Mayor's Report Provided update Mayor Marchand 8/15/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Ribbon-cutting Hallway Health Mayor Marchand 8/17/2024 Las Positas College Performance Celebration of the 78th Anniversary of India's
Independence
Mayor Marchand 8/19/2024 Council on American-Islamic Relations Presentation Recognizing Islamic Appreciation Month Mayor Marchand 8/21/2024 Livermore Wine Community Blessing of the Grapes Blessing of the Grapes Mayor Marchand 8/21/2024 City of Livermore Retirement Honoring the career of Greg Park Mayor Marchand 8/21/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Business mixer Networking with local businesses Mayor Marchand 8/22/2024 Chamber of Commerce Annual Tri-Valley Mayors' Summit Panel discussion Item 8.0
Council Reports
830
Council Member
Date of Meeting
or Event Committee or Organization
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting) Summary of Meeting or Event
Mayor Marchand 8/24/2024 Boy Scouts of America Eagle Scout Court of Honor Spoke and presented Certificate of Recognition Mayor Marchand 8/29/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) State of the Nation Presentation by Congressman Swalwell Mayor Marchand 8/29/2024 Innovation Tri-Valley State of the Tri-Valley Panel discussions and networking Mayor Marchand 8/30/2024 City of Livermore Ribbon-cutting BEAM solar installation Mayor Marchand 8/31/2024 S.F. Caledonian Club
Largest Highland Gathering and Games in
Country Attended
Mayor Marchand 9/3/2024 City of Livermore Retirement Lt. Josh Radcliffe's retirement Mayor Marchand 9/5/2024 City of Livermore TV30 Mayor's Report Provided a City update Mayor Marchand 9/5/2024 City of Livermore Key to the City Spoke about the history of Livermore Mayor Marchand 9/6/2024 San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Commission Meeting Received updates and approved contracts.

Mayor Marchand 9/6/2024 Open Heart Kitchen Annual Gala Fund-raising gala to support Open Heart Kitchen Mayor Marchand 9/7/2024 City of Livermore Community Service Day Joined over 500 residents to work on projects
throughout the City
Mayor Marchand 9/8/2024 Holy Cross Lutheran School 50-year anniversary Presented a Mayor's Certificate recognizing the
50-year anniversary
Mayor Marchand 9/9/2024 Livermore-Amador Valley Transit (LAVTA) Board meeting Approved the Treasurer's report and the remote
work policy. Received updates
Item 8.0
Council Reports
831
Council Member
Date of Meeting
or Event Committee or Organization
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting)
Vice Mayor Carling 7/30/2024 Livermore-Pleasanton City Council Liaison Meeting Vice Mayor Carling 8/1/2024 City of Livermore
Summer intern commencement at LPD
community room
Vice Mayor Carling 8/3/2024 Tri-Valley Non Profit Alliance (TVNPA) Salud y Sol - End of Summer Health BBQ at
May Nissen Park
Vice Mayor Carling 8/6/2024 City of Livermore National Night Out Vice Mayor Carling 8/21/2024 Livermore Wine Community Blessing of the Grapes Vice Mayor Carling 8/21/2024
Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency
(LAVWMA) Board meeting
Vice Mayor Carling 8/22/2024 Chamber of Commerce Annual Tri-Valley Mayors' Summit Vice Mayor Carling 8/29/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Wine Country Luncheon Vice Mayor Carling 8/30/2024 City of Livermore
EV charger ribbon cutting with Department of
Energy
Vice Mayor Carling 9/7/2024 City of Livermore
Community Service Day-worked at Marylin
Avenue School
Item 8.0
Council Reports
832
Council Member
Date of Meeting
or Event Committee or Organization
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting) Summary of Meeting or Event
Council Member Barrientos 8/28/2024
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting (City of Livermore, Livermore Area Recreations and Parks District (LARPD),
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District (LVJUSD) Committee Meeting Discussed cell phone usage in schools.

Communication boards
Council Member Barrientos 8/3/2024 City of Livermore
Salud y Sol community event with several
organizations represented
The event was well attended with food served by
Open Heart Kitchen, awards and speakers.

Council Member Barrientos 8/6/2024 City of Livermore Planning Commission meeting Update on the Garaventa Hills development Council Member Barrientos 8/29/2024 Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce (LVCC) Wine Country Luncheon Congressman Swalwell provided updates
happening in Congress. Summarized the millions
of dollars allocated to our area
Council Member Barrientos 8/29/2024 Tri Valley
Meeting of the Tri Valley governments with
sponsors present
Several speakers addressing the innovative
activities in each city
Council Member Barrientos 8/30/2024 City of Livermore Ribbon cutting Beam, a government program to bring green
energy via car chargers developed and designed
by Beam
Council Member Barrientos 9/7/2024 City of Livermore Community Service Day I spent several hours along with Sarah, Cindy and
Tony spreading 2 yards of dirt in the dog park at
Marlin Park
Council Member Barrientos 9/7/2024 Livermore Valley Performing Arts (Livermore Valley Arts) Gala Fundraiser The yearly fundraiser for the arts in Livermore Item 8.0
Council Reports
833
Council Member
Date of Meeting
or Event Committee or Organization
Meeting or Event Type (ex. board meeting or
ribbon cutting)
Council Member Branning 9/7/2024 City of Livermore Livermore Community Service Day Council Member Branning 9/2/2024 Livermore-Amador Valley Transit (LAVTA) Projects and Services Committee Meeting Council Member Branning 8/28/2024
Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency
(LAVWMA) Board Meeting
Council Member Branning 8/28/2024
Intergovernmental Committee Meeting (City of Livermore, Livermore Area Recreations and Parks District (LARPD),
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District (LVJUSD) Committee Meeting Council Member Branning 8/20/2024 Livermore Downtown Inc (LDI) Board Meeting Council Member Branning 8/5/2024 Livermore-Amador Valley Transit (LAVTA) Board Meeting Council Member Branning 8/6/2024 City of Livermore National Night Out Council Member Branning 8/3/2024 Tri-Valley Non Profit Alliance (TVNPA) Salud Y Sol Council Member Branning 9/9/2024 Livermore-Amador Valley Transit (LAVTA) Board Meeting Item 8.0
Council Reports
834

Livermore City CouncilSeptember 9, 2024

Livermore City Council
September 9, 2024