Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Livermore City Council
November 25, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 25, 2024
Body
Livermore City Council
Pages
13
Original file
147.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

EXHIBIT A
138
and Taxation Code section 30130.57, subdivision (e)(l) and this Chapter. (i) "Grantee" means an Applicant that has been awarded a Grant. (j) "Grant Agreement" means the written agreement between the Department and a Grantee, setting forth the terms and conditions of the use of Grant funds. (k) "Local Law Enforcement Agency" means a local government entity, such as a county, city, district, public authority, public agency, and any other political subdivision or public corporation that can support and hire law enforcement peace officers (as defined in Penal Code section 830) and is authorized to perform any of the following activities:
(1) Investigate or conduct an official inquiry into enforcement of state and local laws. ordinances, regulations, and policies related to the illegal sales and marketing of Tobacco Products to Minors and Youth.
(2) Prosecute or otherwise conduct a criminal or civil proceeding arising from the illegal sales of Tobacco Products to Minors and Youth.
([) "Minor" means an individual under the legal age (as specified in Penal Code section 308) to purchase, possess. or use Cigarettes or Tobacco Products. (m) "Project" means the activities and deliverables described in the Application to be accomplished through a Grant Agreement with funding.
(n) "Tobacco Products" has the same meaning as that in Revenue and Taxation Code section 30130.50, subdivision (b).
(o) "Youth" means an individual under 18 years old.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Sections 30121, 30130.50 and 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code; Sections 308 and 830, Penal Code.

Article 2. Application
§ 510. Request for Proposal.
(a) The Department shall issue a Request for Proposal (RFP) on the Department's website at https://oag.ca.gov/tobaccogrants for available Grants. An RFP shall include information about the following:
(l) The approximate amount of available funding.
(2) Deadline to submit an Application.

Page 2 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
139
(3) Application requirements, as defined in Sections 530 and 531. (4) Eligibility requirements as defined in Sections 520 and 521. (5) Eligible Project cost requirements as defined in Section 522. (6) The criteria that the Department will use to evaluate the Applications as defined in Sections 531 and 532.
(b) Grants shall be awarded each calendar year, provided funding is available. (c) Allocation of funds is contingent on the enactment of the state budget. The Department does not disburse funds until the budget has passed and is signed by the Governor.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Article 3. Eligibility and Eligible Costs
§ 520. Applicant Eligibility.

A Local Law Enforcement Agency is eligible to apply for a Grant.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 521. Proiect Eligibility.

The Project must include one or more of the following law enforcement efforts to be eligible for a Grant:
(a) Enforcing state and local laws related to the illegal sales and marketing of Tobacco Products to Minors.
(b) Conducting investigative activities and compliance checks to reduce the illegal sales of Cigarettes and Tobacco Products to Minors and Youth.
(c) Enforcing state and local laws related to the illegal sales and marketing of Cigarettes to Minors.
(d) Other programs supporting law enforcement peace officers' efforts to prevent or reduce illegal sales or marketing of Cigarettes and Tobacco Products to Minors and Youth, including, but not limited to, community outreach and education activities.

Page 3 ends

EXHIBIT A
140
Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 522. Eligible Costs.
(a) Eligible Project costs are costs documented in the Grant Agreement and directly related to the work identified in the Project description and approved by the Grant Agreement. Final determination of eligibility will be made by the Department. (b) All costs charged to the Project shall be documented within the Budget of the Project.

Eligible Project costs include. but are not limited to:
(1) Personnel and Administrative: Costs reported for reimbursement must be based on actual wages for Grantee's staff or contracted staff, and may include benefits (e.g., health care, vacation, sick leave, retirement and/or social security contribution) that are customarily paid by the Grantee. Personnel benefit charges shall be calculated in proportion to the actual time worked on a Project. No more than five percent of the Grant shall be used for administrative costs.
(2) Travel: Costs for mileage, meals, and lodging. Grantees shall retain all records described in Section 545.
(3) Operational: Supplies and materials may be purchased for a specific Project, provided the items are claimed at a cost no higher than the original purchase price paid by the Grantee. Items not specifically listed in the Grant Agreement must be approved by the Department prior to purchase.
(4) Equipment: The cost of Equipment purchased for the Project shall not exceed the minimum amount necessary to accomplish the Project. Expenditures shall reflect costs outlined in the budget narrative as defined in Section 530. (5) Media Campaigns.
(6) Training that is sponsored by the Department for the California Healthcare, Research, and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 Tobacco Fund, or related to the Project for which the Grant was awarded.
(7) Decoys for undercover operations.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section

Page 4 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
141
30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 523. Ineligible Costs.
(a) All costs that do not meet the criteria in Section 522 are ineligible Project costs. Ineligible Project costs include, but are not limited to:
(1) Expenditures outside the Project performance period as specified in the Grant Agreement; (2) Work or services performed outside ofthe Project description in the Grant Agreement; (3) Any real estate purchase or lease;
(4) Goods or services for personal use, including but not limited to, awards, award certificates or ribbons, balloons, briefcases, calendars, cleaning supplies, coffee pots and supplies, food and beverages, gift cards, hand sanitizers, Kleenex/tissue paper, luggage, luggage carriers, picture frames, eating utensils, fans, heaters, and refrigerators. (5) Law enforcement materials and supplies, including but not limited to, firearms and related accessories, vests, uniforms, K9, pepper spray, vehicles, and vehicle trailers. (b) Grant funds shall not to be used to supplant existing state or local funds for the Grantee's Project. Supplant means using Grant funds to pay for costs that are already funded within the Grantee's budget, or for which other state or local funds have already been received, in order to reallocate existing funds for other purposes.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Article 4. Application Submittal, Review, and Grant Award § 530. Application Requirements.
(a) An Application must contain the following:
(1) A cover sheet that shall include: Applicant name; authorized representative's name, classification/position, address, phone number and email address; contact person's name, classification/position, address, phone number, and email address. (2) A signature page signed by a representative authorized to submit the Application. (3) Requested Grant amount; Project or Grant funding duration (24 or 36 months); and a brief summary of the description of the Project and its goals and objectives.

Page 5 ends

EXHIBIT A
142
(4) A problem statement, as described in subdivision (b). (5) A description of how the Grant will be spent, as described in subdivision (c). (6) A Budget of eligible costs for the Project for 24 months or 36 months. The Budget shall contain the description and cost of the salaries, overtime, and benefits for each classification/position for each fiscal year, operating expenses and Equipment for each fiscal year, travel, administrative costs, and other expenses. Applications shall include a budget narrative justifying each cost. Applications shall also identify any state or local funding sources and amounts for the proposed Project.
(7) A narrative of previous tobacco Grant awards received from the Department, if applicable.
(8) Certifications, as described in subdivisions (d) and (e). (9) Letters of intent, if applicable, as described in subdivision (f). (b) Problem statement. An Applicant's problem statement shall describe a specific Cigarette or Tobacco Product related problem; a reasonable estimate ofthe scale ofthe problem, including how the problem affects Minors and Youth; the geographic area in which the problem persists, including, but not limited to, population data, relevant demographic and socio-economic characteristics ofthe community; Cigarette or Tobacco Product use rates and patterns, including, but not limited to, the rates and patterns of use in the community, particularly ofMinors and Youth, the number of Cigarette or Tobacco Product retailers in the geographic area, and data regarding sales to Minors and Youth and specific problem locations; and any other factors contributing to the Cigarette or Tobacco Product related problems in the geographic area. The problem statement may be supported by studies, research summaries. crime statistics, or data from the California Department of Public Health.
(c) Project description. An Applicant's Project description shall include an explanation of how the Project will address the problem identified in the Applicant's problem statement, a list and narrative description of Project goals and order of priority, desired outcomes and an explanation of how the Applicant will measure those outcomes and the success ofthe Project, and a time line for completing each goal measured in three-month increments. The Project description shall also specify the personnel positions that will be funded to carry out the Project, a description ofthe duties of each position, and the percentage oftime that will be allocated to each duty. (d) Certification regarding conflicts. An Applicant shall certify in its Application that it does not

Page 6 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
143
receive funding from a manufacturer, distributor, or advertiser of Cigarettes or Tobacco Products.
(e) Certification regarding supplanting. An Applicant shall certify in its Application that the requested Grant funds will not supplant existing state or local funds dedicated for the same purpose.
(f) Letters of intent. Any Applicant intending to contract with another entity to achieve the Project objectives shall provide a letter of intent signed by an official representative of each contractor conveying an intention to contract with the Applicant.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 531. Administrative Review of Application.
(a) The Department will review the Applications to ensure they are submitted by eligible Applicants, meet the requirements of Section 530, and are received by the Department in accordance with the RFP described in Section 510.
(b) The administrative review is a pass/fail evaluation. Only Applications that pass this review shall be evaluated under Section 532.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 532. Scoring of Application.
(a) Applications that pass the administrative review under Section 531 shall be reviewed by a merits review committee. The merits review committee shall initially assess whether or not the proposed Project is eligible under Section 521. This will render a pass/fail score. (b) Each Application that qualifies after the review under subdivision (a) will be evaluated according to the following criteria:
(1) The significance of the problem to be addressed.
(2) The proposed Proiect and its goals and objectives, and the extent to which the proposed Project addresses the problem.

Page 7 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
144
(3) The qualifications of the personnel required to implement the Project. (4) The completeness, accuracy, and reasonableness of the estimated Budget. (5) The capacity of the Applicant to achieve its stated goals and objectives. In assessing capacity, the Department may consider indicators of community support for the proposed Project, including letters of stakeholder support and information about the Applicant's community outreach efforts. In assessing capacity of an Applicant that is a party to an existing or prior Grant Agreement, the Department shall consider the Applicant's historical performance under the existing or prior Grant Agreement.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 533. Grant Award.
{a) Grants will be awarded for the full or partial amount requested. or denied, based on the following factors:
(1) Amount of available funding;
(2) Number of Applicants;
(3) Amount of funding requested by Applicants;
(4) The merits of the Application based on the criteria set forth under Section 532;and
(5) The Department's funding priorities.
{b) The merits review committee will submit its recommendations for funding to the Attorney General or designee for final selection. The Department shall notify the Applicant of the Grant award, including the amount, or the denial of a Grant award. (c) The Department's selection{s) are final and not subject to administrative appeal.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Page 8 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
145
Article 5. Grant Agreement, Reimbursement, Progress Reports, Recordkeeping, and Audits
§ 540. Grant Agreement.
(a) Applicants selected for a Grant award shall provide a resolution of the Applicant's governing body, ifone exists, authorizing the Applicant to enter into a contract with the State and identifying the person authorized to execute the contract for the Applicant. The resolution shall expressly authorize future amendments, if any, for the purpose of increasing funding provided in the original contract, without an additional resolution from the governing body. (b) The Grantee shall return a letter of intent to accept the award within 15 calendar days of the date ofthe Department's written award notice. The Grant Agreement shall then be prepared and executed with the Grantee.
(c) The terms and conditions of a Grant shall be set forth in a Grant Agreement entered into by the Department and the Grantee. A Grantee has the sole responsibility for the fiscal management of Grant funds, recordkeeping, reporting, performance ofthe Project, and all other aspects of compliance with this Chapter and the Grant Agreement. The Grant Agreement shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
( 1) Grant amount.
(2) Grantee contact information.
(3) Grant duration.
(4) Description of the Project funded by the Grant award in Section 533. (5) Budget with eligible costs.
(6) The Grantee's agreement to indemnify and hold harmless the Department, and all officers, agents and employees ofthe same, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, or losses of any kind or nature, whether direct or indirect, arising from or relating to the Project or use ofthe Grant.
(7) The Grantee's agreement to comply with the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016 and this Chapter.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Page 9 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
146
§ 541. Reimbursement.
(a) Reimbursement payments cannot be provided until a fully executed Grant Agreement is returned to the Department.
(b) Eligible costs incurred may only be reimbursed if a request is submitted to the Department on a quarterly basis on January 15th, April 15th, July 15th, and October 15th with an itemization of expenditures that shall include, but is not limited to:
(1) Purchases: paid invoices and/or receipts:
(2) Services: paid invoices and/or receipts;
(3) Timekeeping and Equipment logs: transaction register or other electronically generated reports; and
(4) Training and Travel: paid invoices and/or receipts. (c) The Department is responsible for approving and processing reimbursement requests. The Department reserves the right to withhold approval of reimbursement requests if the Grantee is, at any time. not adhering to the Grant Agreement or the statutes or regulations governing the Tobacco Grant Program; or if the Grantee has not submitted any outstanding documentation or reports required by this Chapter.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 542. Progress Reports.
(a) Grantees must submit quarterly progress reports and other information requested by the Department related to the Grant. Quarterly progress reports shall be submitted on January 15th, April 15th, July 15th, and October 15th and shall describe Grant activities undertaken pursuant to the Grant Agreement during the reporting period. The final quarterly report shall describe Grant activities completed up to the end of the term of the Grant award. (b) The Department may withhold the final reimbursement claim(s) or 10 percent of the Grant amount, whichever is more, pending approval by the Department of the final quarterly report.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Page 10 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
147
§ 543. Grant Agreement Amendments.
(a) A Grantee may request a change in the use of Grant funds, the Project description, or the duration ofthe Grant award, or other changes related to the Project or Budget under the Grant Agreement by submitting a written request to the Department that includes the reasons the change is needed and that demonstrates the change is consistent with the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016 and this Chapter. (b) With the exception of Budget modifications, only one amendment is allowed during the duration ofthe Grant. Grantees may request up to three Budget modifications per fiscal year.

Budget modifications are limited to moving funds from one fiscal year to another or realigning funds to increase a line item by no more than 10 percent ofthe original amount awarded for the line item.
(c) Requests to extend the duration ofthe Grant will not be considered unless received by the Department at least six months prior to the end ofthe duration ofthe Grant award.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 544. Project Breach-Termination.

Failure of a Grantee to comply with the Grant Agreement or this Chapter shall be treated by the Department as a breach of contract. Ifthe Department determines there is a breach ofthe Grant Agreement, the Department shall give the Grantee written notification. If the Grantee does not commence action to remedy the breach within 30 calendar days ofthe date ofthe written notice, the Department may terminate the Grant Agreement and void the Department's obligations. The Project shall remain subject to all recordkeeping and audit requirements contained in this Chapter.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 545. Recordkeeping.
(a) Personnel Records: The Grantee shall document and keep records of all labor and personnel

Page 11 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
148
activity related to the Project, including payroll and attendance records and reports produced by an electronic timekeeping system.
(b) Travel Claims: The Grantee shall document and identify the personnel time, date of activity, work performed, and miles or other travel related to the Project. (c) Other Records: The Grantee shall maintain all receipts, invoices, and records of procurement of goods or services related to the Project.
(d) Record Retention: The Grantee shall retain all documents, records, receipts, and financial accounts related to the Project as required by this section and as otherwise necessary to substantiate the purpose for which the funds were spent for five years from the expiration of the Grant Agreement, or in accordance with the Grantee's records retention period, whichever is longer.

Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.
§ 546. Audits.
(a) The Department has the authority to conduct an audit of the Grantee's expenditure of Grant funds.
(b) Grantees shall cooperate with the Department by providing any and all documents, records, receipts, and financial account records described in Section 545 to the Department upon request. (c) One or more of the following shall be grounds for an audit exception, which may require the refund of amounts paid with Grant funds: (1) failure to fully complete the work or services described in the Project description under the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement; (2) failure to assess the performance of any contract entered into by a Grantee relating to a Grant as agreed to in the Grant Agreement; and (3) failure to maintain documents, records, receipts, and financial accounts supporting the expenditures reimbursed with Grant funds. (d) The Department shall confirm the completion of the work or services described in the Project description and may inspect and/or make copies of any books, records, or reports of the Grantee pertaining to the Project.
(e) Upon completion of an audit, if there is a refund due to the state, the Grantee shall remit the refund due within 60 calendar days from the notification to the Grantee by the Department.

Page 12 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
149
Note: Authority cited: Section 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Sections 30130.56 and 30130.57, Revenue and Taxation Code.

Page 13 of 13 ends

EXHIBIT A
150
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.7
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brandon Cardwell, Innovation and Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the execution of Project and Program Grant Agreements with Las Positas College Foundation, Livermore Art Association, and Livermore Valley Performing Arts Center dba Livermore Valley Arts, consistent with the City's Public Art Policy.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Commission for the Arts and staff recommend the City Council adopt a resolution approving the applications and authorizing the execution of the following Project and Program Grant Agreements:

Las Positas College Foundation in the amount of $10,000 for 2025 LPC Literary Arts Festival Livermore Arts Association in the amount of $5,800 for 2025 Spring Arts Program Livermore Valley Performing Arts Center dba Livermore Valley Arts in the amount of $10,000 for four events in the Cultural Celebration Series

SUMMARY
The Commission for the Arts administers the Project and Program Grant Program, including reviewing funding applications twice per year in March and September and providing funding recommendations to the City Council for final approval. In September 2024, a total of three (3) eligible applications were received for Project and Program grant funds. The Commission for the Arts and staff recommend the City Council adopt a resolution approving the execution of a Project and Program Grant Agreement with each of the following three (3) applicants: Las Positas College Foundation, Livermore Art Association, and Livermore Valley Performing Arts Center dba Livermore Valley Arts.

DISCUSSION
In 2004, the City Council created the Public Art Fund for the purpose of funding public art and cultural programming. In 2008, the City Council created the Project and Program Grant Program to provide funding from the Public Art Fund for local organizations and artists providing cultural enrichment experiences in Livermore.

The Commission for the Arts administers the Project and Program Grant Program, including reviewing funding applications twice a year in March and September and providing funding recommendations to 151
the City Council for final approval. Opportunities for funding were posted on the city website and social media. On September 1, 2024, staff received a total of three (3) eligible applications which were reviewed by an ad hoc committee of the Commission for the Arts. The committee presented its funding recommendations to the full Commission at its regular meeting on September 24, 2024. The Commission for the Arts selected all three (3) applications for funding. The three (3) recommended projects, which meet the evaluation criteria and include expenses that are eligible for funding, total $25,800 and are described below:

Agency Project Funds Requested Grant
Recommendation
Las Positas College
Foundation
2025 LPC Literary Arts
Festival
$10,000 $10,000
Livermore Art
Association
2025 Spring Arts
Program
$5,800 $5,800
Livermore Valley Arts
Cultural Celebration
Series- Diwali, Lunar
New Year, AANHPI
Celebration, Juneteenth
$10,000 $10,000
The Las Positas College Foundation's 2025 LPC Literary Arts Festival is a free, one-day, festival of local and international literary speakers, workshops, and activities located at the college and open to Las Positas College students and the community. The Livermore Art Association's 2025 Spring Arts Program is comprised of two major art shows: Spring Art Show and Essential Figure Show, which combined represent 80 years of visual art exhibits. Livermore Valley Arts' Cultural Celebration Series' second half of the season consists of Diwali: Celebration of Lights, Lunar New Year, Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (AANHPI) Celebration, and Juneteenth.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The Project and Program Grants are funded with Public Art Fee funds, which have been included in the FY 2024-25 budget. No further appropriation is needed at this time.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
4: Inclusive and Inviting Spaces and Places
GOAL
1: Further enhance Livermore's unique sense of place

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Las Positas College Foundation

3. Exhibit B - Livermore Art Association

4. Exhibit C - Livermore Valley Arts
152
Prepared by: Theresa de la Vega
Management Analyst II
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
153
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF PUBLIC ART

FUND PROJECT AND PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENTS WITH LAS
POSITAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000,
LIVERMORE ART ASSOCIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $5,800, AND

LIVERMORE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER DBA
LIVERMORE VALLEY ARTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000
The City Council created the Public Art Fund for the purpose of funding public art and cultural programming consistent with the public art policy administered by the Commission for the Arts. The Project and Program Grant Program was created by the City Council to utilize the Public Art Fund for the promotion of programs for the cultural enrichment of Livermore residents and visitors.

The Commission for the Arts reviews applications for the Project and Program Grant program twice per year, in March and in September. The Commission for the Arts received a total of three (3) applications for September 2024. Following a review of those applications, the Commission for the Arts recommends funding three (3) Project and Program applications.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee, to execute the Las Positas College Foundation Agreement in the amount of $10,000 for the 2025 LPC Literary Arts Festival, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee, to execute the Livermore Arts Association Agreement in the amount of $5,800 for the 2025 Spring Arts Program, attached hereto as Exhibit B.

3. The City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee, to execute the Livermore Valley Performing Arts Center dba Livermore Valley Arts agreement in the amount of $10,000 for four events in the Cultural Celebration Series, attached hereto as Exhibit C.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on November 25, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
154
RESOLUTION NO. ________
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Las Positas College Foundation Agreement
Exhibit B – Livermore Art Association Agreement
Exhibit C– Livermore Valley Arts Agreement
155
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 1
Rev. 10/2023

AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LIVERMORE
AND

LAS POSITAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25

PROJECT AND PROGRAM GRANT AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT, entered into this ____ day of _____________________, 2024, between the City of Livermore, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Las Positas College Foundation, a California non-profit Corporation (“Grantee”).

RECITALS
A. City created Project and Program Grants for the purpose of encouraging programs for the cultural enrichment in the City of Livermore.

B. The primary goal of the Project and Program Grant Program is to serve one or more of the main strands found in the Cultural Arts Master Plan, artsALIVE!, adopted by City Council Resolution number 2007-109 on June 11, 2007.

C. The Commission for the Arts reviews all Project and Program Grant applications and provides City Council with recommendations for funding. Funding is not authorized until City Council approves the Commission for the Arts’ funding recommendations evidenced by City’s signature on this agreement.

D. Grantee has applied to City for funding for a project or program to support the 2025 LPC Literary Arts Festival (“Project”).

E. City wishes to engage Grantee to assist City in utilizing Public Art Fee fund money to provide art projects and programs to Livermore residents.

F. City and Grantee understand that the Project and Program Grant shall be administered consistent with the procedures, standards, regulations, and guidelines for Project and Program Grants, including the 2008 Art in Public Places Program Policy and Procedures Manual and the Cultural Arts Master Plan.

AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, City and Grantee hereby agree that the aforementioned recitals are true and correct, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided herein, further agree as follows:

I. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
Grantee is responsible for administering the Project and Program Grant in a manner satisfactory to City, and consistent with the standards, terms and conditions imposed by the 2008 Art in Public Places Program Policy and Procedures Manual, Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
156
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 2
Rev. 10/2023
Cultural Arts Master Plan, and herein. The Project will include the following activities eligible under the Project and Program Grant Program: Literary Arts Festival to be held on Saturday, May 10, 2025 on the Las Positas College campus.

1. Project and Program Delivery: Grantee agrees to the goals and performance standards as defined below and outlined in the Grantee’s Project and Program Grant application attached as Exhibit “A”.

2. Service Objective: support for a free, all day event of local and internationally famous literary speakers, workshops, and activities located at the Las Positas College campus for the Livermore community and Las Positas College students. Funds will support artistic personnel to staff talks, workshops, panels and marketing the event. (“Activities”).

3. General Administration: The Funds for the Activities are to be administered under the direction of the Grantee’s Executive Director and shall comply with the procedures, standards, regulations and guidelines for Project and Program Grants, including the 2008 Art in Public Places Program Policy and Procedures Manual and the Cultural Arts Master Plan.

B. Budget
City will grant, and Grantee will use, funds in the amount of $10,000 (“Funds”) to perform the Activities consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the 2008 Art in Public Places Program Policy and Procedures Manual, and the Cultural Arts Master Plan.

C. Performance Monitoring
City will monitor Grantee’s performance against the project or program description outlined in the Grantee’s Project and Program Grant application attached as Exhibit “A”.

Substandard performance as determined by City will constitute non-compliance with this Agreement.

II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Grantee shall complete its Activities within one year of the date of execution of this Agreement. If Grantee requires an extension of time for full performance, it may request an extension from the Commission for the Arts. The decision of the Commission for the Arts shall be final.

III. PAYMENT
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount of the Funds available from City to Grantee for the Activities under this Agreement shall not exceed $10,000.

The City shall disburse the Project & Program Grant in three installments: 30 percent in advance, 40 percent once material progress can be shown and evidence of the matching grant cash requirement has been submitted, and the final 30 percent after a satisfactory Final Report Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
157
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 3
Rev. 10/2023
has been filed. The Project & Program subcommittee of the Commission for the Arts has sole discretion to decide whether each of these milestones has been reached.

IV. NOTICES
Any notice required or permitted under the terms of this Agreement shall be effective upon receipt in writing either by personal service upon the authorized agent for the party, or by mailing the notice via U.S. Mail to the party as follows:

City: City of Livermore
Attn: Theresa De La Vega, Commission for the Arts Staff Liaison 1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, California 94550
Grantee: Las Positas College Foundation
Attn: Kenneth Cooper, Executive Director
V. GENERAL CONDITIONS
A. General Compliance
Grantee agrees to comply with the requirements of state and local laws and regulations governing the Funds available under this Agreement. Grantee also agrees to comply with all additional regulations and policies issued pursuant to these regulations. Grantee further agrees to utilize the Funds available under this Agreement to supplement, rather than supplant, funds otherwise available. Furthermore, with respect to the performance of Activities under this Agreement, Grantee agrees to comply with all federal, state, and local laws, statutes, rules, and regulations pertaining to the performance of those Activities.

B. Independent Contractor
Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed in any manner to, create or establish the relationship of employer/employee between the parties.

Grantee shall at all times remain an Independent Contractor with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. City shall be exempt from payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance, and Workers' Compensation Insurance as Grantee is an Independent Contractor.

C. Hold Harmless
Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and designated volunteers harmless from and against any and all loss, liability, damage, including reasonable attorney’s and expert fees and/or court costs, arising out of the performance of the Activities under this Agreement, except for the gross negligence and willful misconduct of City, its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and designated volunteers.

Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
158
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 4
Rev. 10/2023
D. Insurance
Grantee shall procure and maintain insurance for the duration of the contract in the amounts and under the terms set forth in Exhibit “B” against claims that may arise from or in connection with this Agreement and performance of the Project. Upon reasonable written notice, Grantee shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to-time by the City of Livermore Risk Manager.

E. City Recognition
Grantee shall acknowledge City’s financial support in all appropriate materials and media. The acknowledgment shall read, “Supported in part by a grant from the City of Livermore” or similar language, unless the City of Livermore is a part of a list of supporters. In the latter case, the acknowledgement may say only “City of Livermore.” Grantee shall display the City of Livermore’s logo whenever other sponsor logos are displayed, and in accordance with the City of Livermore’s logo use guidelines.

F. Amendments
City or Grantee may amend this Agreement at any time provided such amendments make specific reference to this Agreement, and are executed in writing, signed by a duly authorized representative of both organizations. Such amendments shall not invalidate this Agreement, nor relieve or release City or Grantee from its obligations under this Agreement.

City may, in its discretion, amend this Agreement to conform with state or local laws, regulations, guidelines, or policies related to the use of the Funds for the Activities. However, if such amendments result in a change in the funding, the scope of services, or the Activities, such modifications shall be incorporated only by written amendment signed by both City and Grantee.

G. Suspension, Termination, Return of Funds

1. Termination for Cause. City may suspend or terminate this Agreement if Grantee materially fails to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the following:
a. Failure to comply with any of the rules, regulations or provisions referred to herein, or such statues, regulations, policies, or directives as may become applicable at any time;
b. Failure, for any reason, of Grantee to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligation under this Agreement;
c. Ineffective or improper use of Funds provided under this Agreement; or d. Submission by Grantee to City reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect.

City shall give Grantee written notice of any failure to comply with the Agreement.

If Grantee does not remedy the deficiency or non-compliance within fifteen (15) calendar days Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
159
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 5
Rev. 10/2023
after the date the notice is sent, City may exercise any of the remedies available under law and equity, including but not limited to the termination of this Agreement.

Pending correction of any compliance, City shall withhold fifteen percent (15%) of the remaining Agreement Funds until Grantee corrects the deficiency, Grantee is otherwise found to be in compliance by City, or Grantee is otherwise adjudicated to be in compliance with the Agreement.

2. Termination for Convenience: This Agreement may also be terminated for convenience by either City or Grantee, in whole or in part, by giving notice of such termination, the effective date of the termination, and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. However, if in the case of a partial termination, if City determines that the remaining portion of the Funds or Activities will not accomplish the purpose for which the award was made, City may terminate the Agreement in its entirety.

Written notice of termination must be provided at least thirty (30) calendar days before the effective date of such termination.

3. Effect of Termination: In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, photographs, reports, or other materials prepared by Grantee under this Agreement shall, at City r’s option, become the property of City, and Grantee shall only be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents or materials prior to the termination. Any remaining Funds shall be returned to the City’s Public Art Fund for reallocation.

Termination for failure to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement may result in Grantee becoming ineligible to participate in future Commission for the Arts grant programs.

Termination for any reason shall immediately suspend the Funds available under this Agreement, terminate any claim Grantee has to such Funds, and result in Funds being immediately refunded to City for use and reallocation by City.

VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Documentation and Recordkeeping

1. Records to be Maintained: Grantee shall maintain the following records including, but not limited to:
a. Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken and the date(s) on which the activity occurred;
b. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of the objectives of the Program & Program Grant; and
c. Quarterly and annual revenue and expense reports for Activities funded by this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
160
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 6
Rev. 10/2023

2. Retention: Grantee shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred in the performance of the Activities under this Agreement for a period of two (2) years after the termination of all activities funded under this Agreement.

3. Objectives: Grantee agrees to maintain documentation that demonstrates that the Activities meet one or more of the objectives of the strands identified in the Cultural Arts Master Plan.

4. Audits and Inspections: All Grantee records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to City at any time during normal business hours, as often as City deems necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data.

Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be corrected by Grantee within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of notice of deficiency by Grantee. Failure of Grantee to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this Agreement and constitute cause for termination pursuant to Paragraph V.

B. Reporting and Payment Procedures

1. Payment Procedures: City will pay to Grantee Funds available under this Agreement based upon information submitted by Grantee, and consistent with the 2008 Art in Public Places Program Policy and Procedures Manual. City reserves the right to liquidate Funds available under this Agreement for costs incurred by City on behalf of Grantee.

2. Progress Reports: Grantee shall submit a Material Progress Report to the Commission for the Arts when it feels the Project has made material progress. Grantee shall also submit a Final Report when its Project Activities are complete. These reports are prerequisites to receiving the second and third grant installment payments, in accordance with Section III. The Grantee shall determine the form and content of the Progress Reports.

3. Quarterly Revenue and Expense Reports: Grantee shall submit Quarterly Revenue and Expense Reports for grant activities to the Community Development Director.

VII. PERSONNEL AND PARTICIPANT CONDITIONS
A. Assignability
Grantee shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of City. However, claims for money due or to become due to Grantee from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to Grantee.

B. Conflict of Interest
Grantee agrees to abide by the provisions of the California Political Reform Act (Gov.

Code §§ 81000 et seq.) and related regulations (2 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 18109 et seq.) with Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
161
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 7
Rev. 10/2023
respect to conflicts of interest, and covenants that it presently has no financial interest, and shall not acquire any financial interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the Activities under this Agreement.

Grantee further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no persons who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the Activities, or who are in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such Activities, have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect to the Activities or with respect to the proceeds from the Activities, either for themselves or those with whom they have a business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for a period of one (1) year thereafter.

These conflict of interest provisions apply to any person who is an employee, agent, Grantee, officer, or elected or appointed official of Grantee.

C. Subcontracts

1. Approvals: Grantee shall not enter into any subcontracts with an agency or individual in the performance of this Agreement without the prior written consent of City.

2. Monitoring: Grantee will monitor all subcontracted services to assure Agreement compliance. Results of monitoring efforts must be summarized in written reports, and supported with documented evidence, of follow-up actions taken to correct areas of noncompliance.

3. Content: Grantee shall cause all of the provisions of this Agreement in its entirety to be included in, and made a part of, any subcontract executed in the performance of this Agreement.

D. Copyright
If this Agreement results in any copyrightable material, City reserves the right to royaltyfree, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use and to authorize others to use, the work for government purposes.

E. Religious Organization
Grantee agrees that funds provided under this Agreement will not be utilized for religious activities, to promote religious interests, or for the benefit of a religious organization.

VIII. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect.

IX. WAIVER
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
162
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 8
Rev. 10/2023
City’s failure to act with respect to a breach by Grantee does not waive its right to act with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of City to exercise or enforce any right or provision shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.

X. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between City and Grantee for the use of Funds received under this Agreement and it supersedes all prior or contemporaneous communications and proposals, whether electronic, oral, or written between City and Grantee with respect to this Agreement.

XI. BINDING EFFECT
All the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefits of and be binding upon successors and assigns of the parties to this Agreement.

XII. COUNTERPARTS
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by delivering a facsimile or secure electronic copy of the signed agreement to the other party, followed by delivery of the original documents bearing the original signatures. However, failure to deliver the original documents does not affect the enforceability of this Agreement.
***********************************************************************************************************

SIGNATURES AND ATTACHMENT LIST ON NEXT PAGE
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
163
Project and Program Grant Agreement Page 9
Rev. 10/2023
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

Las Positas College Foundation
a California non-profit corporation
“Grantee”
By:___________________________ Dated:____________________________ Kenneth Cooper
Executive Director

CITY OF LIVERMORE
a Municipal Corporation
“City”
By:__________________________ Dated:____________________________ Brandon Cardwell
Innovation and Economic Development Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________

DEPUTY/ASSISTANT/CITY ATTORNEY
Attachments:

Exhibit A Application for Project and Program Grant from the City of Livermore Exhibit B Insurance Requirements
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D 11/5/2024 | 12:02 PM PST

EXHIBIT A
164

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
165

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
166

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
167

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
168

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
169

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
170

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
171

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
172

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
173

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
174

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
175

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
176

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
177

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
178

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
179

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
180

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
181

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
182

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
183

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
184

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
185

EXHIBIT A
Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
186
Revised 7/10/24 B15- GL

Page 1 ends

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Grantee shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products and completed operations, as applicable:
$1,000,000/$2,000,000 aggregate per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Grantee. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional insured coverage under the Grantee’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or selfinsurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13.

Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
187
Revised 7/10/24 B15- GL

Page 2 ends

including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Grantee’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Grantee shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: FFFA31A0-5D39-4147-91D9-BA97115F837D

EXHIBIT A
188

EXHIBIT B
189

EXHIBIT B
190
191

EXHIBIT B
192

EXHIBIT B
193

EXHIBIT B
194

EXHIBIT B
195

EXHIBIT B
196

EXHIBIT B
197
198

EXHIBIT B
199

EXHIBIT B
200

EXHIBIT B
201

EXHIBIT B
202

EXHIBIT B
203

EXHIBIT B
204

EXHIBIT B
205

EXHIBIT B
206

EXHIBIT B
207

EXHIBIT B
208

EXHIBIT B
209

EXHIBIT B
210

EXHIBIT B
211

EXHIBIT B
212

EXHIBIT B
213

EXHIBIT B
214

EXHIBIT B
215

EXHIBIT B
216

EXHIBIT B
217

EXHIBIT B
218

EXHIBIT B
219

EXHIBIT B
220

EXHIBIT B
221

EXHIBIT B
222

EXHIBIT B
223

EXHIBIT B
224

EXHIBIT B
225

EXHIBIT B
226

EXHIBIT B
227

EXHIBIT B
228

EXHIBIT B
229

EXHIBIT B
230

EXHIBIT B
231

EXHIBIT B
232

EXHIBIT B
233

EXHIBIT B
234

EXHIBIT B
235

EXHIBIT B
236

EXHIBIT B
237

EXHIBIT B
238

EXHIBIT B
239

EXHIBIT B
240

EXHIBIT B
241

EXHIBIT C
242
243
244
245

EXHIBIT C
246

EXHIBIT C
247
248

EXHIBIT C
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273

EXHIBIT C
274
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.8
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brandon Cardwell, Innovation and Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the execution of a grant agreement with Livermore Downtown Inc. in the amount of $90,000 for FY 2024-25.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of a grant agreement with Livermore Downtown Inc. for grant activities from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025, in the amount of $90,000.

SUMMARY
The City's grant agreement with Livermore Downtown Inc. (LDI) dated September 13, 2023, requires LDI to provide an annual report outlining the organization's accomplishments during the previous year and describing its goals for the coming year. On October 28, 2024, the City Council accepted the 2023-2024 Livermore Downtown Inc. Annual Report. Staff recommends the City Council authorize the execution of a grant agreement (Exhibit A to the resolution) with Livermore Downtown Inc. providing $90,000 from the General Fund for FY 2024-25.

DISCUSSION
Since 1986, the City of Livermore, and for a time the former Redevelopment Agency, have provided annual grant funding to Livermore Downtown Inc. (LDI) as part of a common mission to enhance economic growth, assist downtown businesses, and promote the downtown and the City of Livermore.

In FY 2023-24, LDI used the funds to meet its obligations under the agreement through festivals and events, such as: Downtown Street Fest, Year-Round Farmers Markets, Family First Fridays, Thirsty Thursdays, Witches Night Out, Earlier than the Bird, Holiday Village at Carnegie Park, Holiday Sights and Sounds Parade, and Livermore Valley Half Marathon, among others.

LDI also continued to partner with the City of Livermore on dissemination of pertinent information related to ongoing construction projects, parking enforcement policies, sustainability initiatives (including outreach for the reusable food ware ordinance), and other matters highlighted in the annual report. LDI 275
also continued to enhance their digital communication and text notification system to provide critical, time-sensitive updates that impact local businesses.

LDI continues to serve as an important partner in the implementation of the City's economic development plans through the use of social media and other promotional materials. During FY 2023-24, LDI's social media following increased by 500 on Facebook (24.5K followers) and 1,600 on Instagram (11.2K followers), which helps the City expand its reach when partnering with LDI to share information with the community.

For this fiscal year, LDI will continue to partner with the City in promoting economic vitality and implementing sustainable business practices in the downtown, including educating downtown businesses on the City's Climate Action Plan. LDI will also expand its roster of events that drive revenue for downtown businesses and continue to expand on the Livermore Valley Made Initiative, Arts Promotion, and Livermore Valley tourism efforts and programs, among other activities and programs highlighted in their annual report and in the attached Grant Agreement.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The $90,000 has already been budgeted in the City's General Fund (Fund 001) for FY 2024-25.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
2: Economy that Prospers
GOAL
1: Lead efforts, in collaboration with internal and external partners, to provide effective communication and engagement with businesses.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Agreement
Prepared by: Theresa de la Vega
Management Analyst II
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
276
RESOLUTION NO. _________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LIVERMORE AND LIVERMORE DOWNTOWN, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Since 1986, the City of Livermore (City), and for a time, the former Redevelopment Agency, provided annual grant funding to Livermore Downtown Inc. (LDI) as part of a common mission to enhance economic growth, assist downtown businesses, and promote the downtown and the City of Livermore.

On October 28, 2024, the City Council accepted LDI’s annual report FY 23-24 and determined that the goals and activities of the Grantee are consistent with the Marketing and Economic Development goals of the City, and therefore Grantee’s continuing operations should be supported through the proposed grant of $90,000 for the length of this grant agreement (July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025).

As part of its continuing operations, Grantee will apply the grant funds to activities that promote proactive communication between downtown businesses and the City, encourage increased visitation to downtown, support small business growth within downtown, and similar activities outlined in the Grant Agreement (Agreement).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Livermore:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Agreement with LDI, attached hereto as Exhibit A, in the amount of $90,000 for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025.

2. Authorizes the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution, including approving minor adjustments to the Agreement.

On motion of Council Member _____________________, seconded by Council Member _____________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on November 25, 2024 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
277
RESOLUTION NO. _________
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Deborah L. Elam Tara Mazzanti
City Clerk Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Grant Agreement with Livermore Downtown Inc. 278
Grant Agreement Page 1 of 4
Rev. 3/2023

GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF LIVERMORE
AND
Livermore Downtown Inc.

FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this ______ day of ______________________, 2024 between the City of Livermore, a municipal corporation ( City ), and Livermore Downtown, Inc., a California nonprofit corporation ( Grantee ).

RECITALS
A. The City is entering into a grant agreement with Grantee for fiscal year 2024- 2025.

B. The is to advocate for the downtown business community by promoting economic growth, preserving our heritage, attracting tourism and fostering an environment where families want to live, work, and play.

C. The City has determined that the goals and activities of the Grantee are consistent with the Marketing and Economic Development goals of the City and therefore should be supported through the proposed grant of $90,000.00, which will enhance and and economic development efforts, including by identifying the

AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree that the above recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows:

1. Grant Activities. Grantee is responsible for its continuing operations. As part of its continuing operations, Grantee will apply the Grant funds to activities that promote proactive communication between downtown businesses and the City, encourage increased visitation to downtown,support small business growth, within downtown,and similar activities as outlined in Exhibit A . 2. Grant Amount. The City will issue, and Grantee will use, funds in the amount of $90,000.00 (the Grant Funds to perform the activities consistent with the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement. City will provide the Grant Funds to Grantee within 30 days of the date on which this Agreement is executed by both the City and Grantee.

3. Time for Performance. Grantee shall complete its Grant Activities prior to June 30, 2025.

4. Recognition of City Grant Funds
Grantee

EXHIBIT A
279
Grant Agreement Page 2 of 4
Rev. 3/2023
logo use guidelines, which are included as Exhibit C to this Grant Agreement.

5. Independent Contractor. Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement is intended to, nor shall be construed in any manner to, create or establish the relationship of employer/employee between the City and Grantee. The City shall have no role in approving, planning, sanctioning, authorizing or controlling the Grant Activities or any activity Grantee undertakes. Grantee shall at all times remain an independent contractor with respect to the services funded by this Grant Agreement. City shall be exempt from payment of all unemployment compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance, and Workers' Compensation Insurance ndependent
contractor.

6. Documentation and Recordkeeping
(a) Grantee shall maintain records providing a full description of each such Grant Activity and the date(s) on which the activity occurred. (b) Grantee shall retain all records pertinent to expenditures incurred in the performance of the Grant Activities under this Grant Agreement and expenditure of Grant Funds for a period of two (2) years after the end of any activity funded pursuant to this Grant Agreement.

7. Suspension, Termination, Return of Funds
(a) City may suspend or terminate this Grant Agreement if Grantee materially fails to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the following:
(1) failure, for any reason, of Grantee to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement; or (2) ineffective or improper use of the Grant Funds provided under this Agreement.
(b) notice of termination for cause must be provided in writing at least ten (10) calendar days before the effective date of termination. (c) In the event the City terminates this Grant Agreement for cause, Grantee shall return all of the Grant Funds awarded which shall be submitted to the reallocation.

8. Hold Harmless. Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold City, elected officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and designated volunteers harmless from and against costs, arising out of the performance of the Grant Activities under this Grant Agreement, except for the gross negligence and willful misconduct of City, its elected officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and designated volunteers. 9. Insurance. Grantee shall procure and maintain insurance during the term of this Grant Agreement in the amounts and under t
all claims that may arise from or in connection with this Grant Agreement. Upon reasonable

EXHIBIT A
280
Grant Agreement Page 3 of 4
Rev. 3/2023
written notice, Grantee shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to10. Amendment. Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. In the event the original of this Agreement is lost or destroyed, an archival copy maintained by City can be used in place of the original for all purposes with the same effect as if it was the original.

11. Notices. Any notice required or permitted under the terms of this Agreement shall be effective upon receipt in writing either by personal service upon the authorized agent for the party, or by mailing the notice via U.S. Mail to the party as follows:

TO CITY: City of Livermore
Attn: Brandon Cardwell
Director of Innovation and Economic Development
1052 S. Livermore Avenue
Livermore, California 94550
TO GRANTEE: Livermore Downtown Inc.

Attn: Ruby Lopez-Villareal
Executive Director
P.O. Box 1067
Livermore, CA 94551

12. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or conditions in this Grant Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the non-breaching party. 13. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines a provision in this Grant Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired in any way.

14. Counterparts. This Grant Agreement may be executed in counterpart by delivering a facsimile or secure electronic copy of the signed agreement to the other party, followed by delivery of the original documents bearing the original signatures. Failure to deliver the original documents does not affect the enforceability of this Agreement. *************************************************************************************************** Signatures and Attachment List on the Next Page

EXHIBIT A
281
Grant Agreement Page 4 of 4
Rev. 3/2023
In concurrence and witness whereof, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided therefore, the parties have executed this Grant Agreement, effective on the date first written above.

GRANTEE: Dated:

Livermore Downtown Inc. ____________________________ ___________________________ By: Ruby Lopez-Villareal Title: Executive Director
CITY OF LIVERMORE: Dated: ____________________________ ____________________________ Marianna Marysheva City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ___________________________ Deputy/Assistant/City Attorney Attachments:

Exhibit A Grant Activities
Exhibit B Insurance Requirements
Exhibit C City Logo Use Guidelines
_______________ B R b L V
____________ D t /A i t _____

EXHIBIT A
282
202 2025
Economic Vitality
1) Identify and engage with specific support organizations for all downtown industries to increase their support systems available (ie. Fitness, Health and Beauty, Retail Shops). 2) Actively recruit business investment and activation strategies for City owned historic properties in downtown Livermore.
3) Develop and Market Business Retention and Recruitment Programs, including tracking of potential and new downtown businesses.
4) Work with businesses on permitting and compliance issues. 5) Provide ongoing tenant and property owner outreach and interaction to inform businesses of City plans, processes and protocols.
6) Maintain Downtown Property Owner and Tenant Roster.
7) Host Monthly meetings with downtown businesses, property owners and City Staff to maintain clear communication on construction impacts, parking and public space use. 8) Communicate to the public updates on key Downtown revitalization projects. 9)
Climate Action Plan, inviting businesses to actively participate and implement sustainable business practices where applicable.

Design
1) Interface with City Code Enforcement and business owners regarding possible nuisances and zoning code violations.
2) Provide input and direction on downtown Bike Corrals, Public Art and Wayfinding Signage.
3) Activate the Lot on First with community and business-supporting uses. 4) Assist in efforts regarding homeless impacts and solutions.

Promotion
1) Expand on Livermore Valley Tourism efforts and programs to expand on destination marketing and hospitality support, as well as arts promotion. 2) Manage and promote the year3) Produce and implement downtown tradition and new events including but not limited to Halloween Hay Day, Witches Night Out, Earlier Than the Bird, Holiday Sights and Sounds Parade, Livermore Half Marathon and Livermore Downtown Street Fest. 4) Manage Downtown kiosks.

Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
283
5) Promote the Downtown District of Livermore to, among others, the Tri-Valley, Regional and State level organizations and potential tourism outlets. 6) Work collaboratively with local and regional organizations, including Livermore Valley Chamber of Commerce, Livermore Cultural Arts Council, Livermore Valley Winegrowers, Livermore Labs, Visit Tri-Valley, and private organizations such as local makers markets. 7) Act as liaison to external organizations in the downtown industry such as California Main Street, the California Downtown Association, the National Main Street Center, California Association of Festival Producers, Visit California, Responsible Hospitality Institute and the California Restaurant Association.
8) Manage and expand the Livermore Valley Made Initiative. 9) Manage a broad selection of Social Media platforms with well populated content and community interest, maintaining our position as a top Livermore Valley influencer.

Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A
284
Revised 7/10/24 B1- GL_AL_WC

Page 1 ends

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Grantee shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products and completed operations, as applicable:
$1,000,000/$2,000,000 aggregate per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability:

Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1,000,000 Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. A waiver of subrogation is required for Workers’ Compensation insurance. If Grantee is a sole proprietor, then they must sign “Contractor Release of Liability”.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Grantee; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Grantee. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional

EXHIBIT A
285
Revised 7/10/24 B1- GL_AL_WC

Page 2 ends

insured coverage under the Grantee’s policy shall be primary and noncontributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or selfinsurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13.

Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and noncontributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Grantee’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Grantee shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

EXHIBIT A
286

EXHIBIT A
287

EXHIBIT A
288

EXHIBIT A
289

EXHIBIT A
290

EXHIBIT A
291

EXHIBIT A
292

EXHIBIT A
293

EXHIBIT A
294

EXHIBIT A
295

EXHIBIT A
296

EXHIBIT A
297
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.9
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to authorize a reduction, by an amount not to exceed $125,000, of the principal and accrued interest owed on the promissory note with Ms. Heather Legan for the City-restricted property located at 318 S. Livermore, Unit 112, sufficient to allow for a market-priced sale and repayment of all tax and first mortgage liens owed, real estate and escrow fees, basic repair costs and provide $5,000 of proceeds to the seller for rehousing.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to authorize a reduction, by an amount not to exceed $125,000, of the principal and accrued interest owed on the Promissory Note with Ms. Heather Legan for the City-restricted property located at 318 S. Livermore, Unit 112, sufficient to allow for a market-priced sale and repayment of all tax and first mortgage liens owed, real estate and escrow fees, basic repair costs and provide $5,000 of proceeds to the seller for rehousing.

SUMMARY
The owner of the City-restricted unit located at 318 S. Livermore Avenue, Unit 112 is experiencing an extreme financial hardship and needs to sell her home. The current affordable sales price for the unit is less than the amount owed on the first mortgage, therefore a re-sale through the City’s Affordable Homeownership Program to an income-eligible buyer is infeasible. To avoid a foreclosure, staff recommends City Council approve a market sale of the property and authorize the City Manager to reduce the City's inclusionary promissory note by an amount of up to $125,000 sufficient to ensure the owner can repay the first lender, property tax liens, real estate fees and make basic repairs, with the remaining proceeds paid to the City to satisfy the inclusionary promissory note and $5,000 of the proceeds for the owner to assist with her rehousing. This proposal would require no financial outlay by the City, and sale of the unit at a market price of $390,000 still may provide an affordable home purchase opportunity for a first-time homebuyer. Proceeds estimated at $90,300 paid to the City would be deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund for future affordable housing purposes.

DISCUSSION
298
In December 2020, the City approved the 1-bedroom townhome located at 318 S. Livermore Avenue, Unit 112, to have resale restrictions modified so that it could be sold through the City’s Affordable Homeownership program to a low-income, first-time homebuyer. Previous restrictions limited the unit to be sold only to persons with developmental disabilities. In May 2021, the home sold through the City’s Affordable Homeownership Program to Ms. Heather Legan. Ms. Legan signed an inclusionary promissory note (the "City Note") which promised to pay the City the difference between the affordable sales price and the appraised fair market value of the home which was calculated at $183,498. Ms.

Legan purchased the home using her own funds and a first mortgage from a private lender in the amount of $267,427. The appraised value in 2021 was $465,000, however the current estimated value is $390,000.

The owner is experiencing an extreme financial hardship, and she now needs to sell her home. The unit was previously in foreclosure, and the first lender is working with the owner to forebear payments until the unit can be sold. The property also has unpaid property tax liens, and some basic repairs are needed on the home to secure the property and improve habitability. If the City were to take no action under the current situation, the unit would likely proceed through the foreclosure process and the timing of sale, security of the property and repayment of the City’s existing deed of trust net of the fees and legal expenses associated with the foreclosure process would be left to the first mortgage lender. Ms. Legan would also experience additional financial hardship from a foreclosure.

According to the City's resale restriction on the property, the owner has two options: Sell the unit to another eligible buyer at a low-income price or sell the unit at market price and pay off the City Note. The current affordable sales price for the unit is less than the amount owed on the first mortgage, therefore a sale to a new income-eligible buyer is infeasible for the owner. Preserving the home for sale through the City’s program would require additional funds be contributed to the transaction by the City to pay off the remaining first mortgage owed, clear the property tax liens and cover fees necessary to sell it to an eligible buyer. Staff has inquired; however, the small unit size is not financially feasible to be owned and rented by a non-profit agency like Tri-Valley REACH.

The City’s note allows for a reduction in principal to ensure that the homeowner is able to repay the first mortgage promissory note at time of sale if the fair market value of the unit is less than the sum of the promissory notes owed. The sum of the notes is currently estimated at $458,498. In addition, unpaid tax liens, needed repairs and real estate fees totaling an estimated $19,700 would be required to sell the property, which are unaffordable for the owner who is experiencing a severe financial hardship.

Staff recommends City Council approve a market sale of the property and authorize the City Manager to reduce the City's promissory note sufficient to ensure the first lender, property tax liens, repairs and real estate fees are repaid with the remainder to be paid to satisfy the City’s inclusionary note and $5,000 of the proceeds to be provided to the owner who is in financial hardship to assist with rehousing. This proposal would require no financial outlay by the City. In addition, although the unit would be unrestricted, the market price of the home still provides an affordable entry point for a first-time homebuyer. Proceeds paid to the City will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund for future affordable housing purposes.

Estimated repayment of the City’s note is based on the listing price of the unit. If offers are higher than expected, proceeds to the City could exceed the estimate. Less proceeds may be received if offers are lower than expected. Staff recommends capping the amount of reduction to the City’s promissory note at 299
$125,000 to provide some flexibility to complete the transaction if offers are lower than expected.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
No general funds will be required for this transaction. As proposed, the following estimated proceeds would be distributed through the transaction, with remaining proceeds to be distributed to the City's Affordable Housing Fund. The amount of the City's current promissory note in the amount of $183,498 would be reduced by an amount not to exceed $125,000 to ensure the liens and fees could be satisfied as proposed.

Net Proceeds for Market Sale of 318 S. Livermore, Unit 112:

Market Listing Price $390,000
Estimated Expenses
First Mortgage Payoff - $275,000
Property Tax Lien Payoff - $2,500
Realtor Fees (3% of Sales Price) - $11,700
Repairs, Misc. Reports & Escrow - $5,500
Total Expenses ($294,700)
Seller Proceeds ($5,000)
Balance of Proceeds to City $90,300

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
7: Expand and preserve the supply of affordable housing opportunities

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution
Prepared by: Fran Earl
Housing and Human Services
Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
300
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN ALL

DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO REDUCE, BY AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $125,000, THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST OWED ON THE PROMISSORY NOTE WITH MS. HEATHER LEGAN FOR THE CITY-RESTRICTED PROPERTY AT 318 S. LIVERMORE AVENUE, UNIT 112, SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR A MARKET

PRICED SALE AND REPAYMENT OF ALL TAX AND FIRST MORTGAGE LIENS

OWED, REAL ESTATE AND ESCROW FEES, BASIC REPAIR COSTS AND PROVIDE $5,000 OF PROCEEDS TO THE SELLER FOR REHOUSING
In May 2021, the home located at 318 S. Livermore Avenue, Unit 112 sold through the City’s Affordable Homeownership Program to Ms. Heather Legan. Ms. Legan signed an inclusionary promissory note (the "City Note") which promised to pay the City the difference between the affordable sales price and the appraised fair market value of the home which was calculated at $183,498.

The owner is experiencing an extreme financial hardship, and she now needs to sell her home. According to the City's resale restriction on the property, the owner has two options: Sell the unit to another eligible buyer at a low-income price or sell the unit at market price and pay off the City Note. The current affordable sales price for the unit is less than the amount owed on the first mortgage, therefore a sale to a new income-eligible buyer is infeasible for the owner. The fair market appraised value in 2021 was $465,000, however the current estimated market value is $390,000.

The City Note allows for a reduction in principal to ensure that the homeowner is able to repay the first mortgage promissory note at time of sale if the fair market value of the unit is less than the sum of the promissory notes owed. The sum of the notes is currently estimated at $458,498. In addition, unpaid tax liens, needed repairs and real estate fees totaling an estimated $19,700 would be required to sell the property which are unaffordable for the owner who is experiencing a severe financial hardship.

Now, the City wishes to approve a market sale of the property and authorize the City Manager to reduce the City Note by an amount sufficient to ensure the first lender, property tax liens, repairs and real estate fees are repaid with the remainder to be paid to satisfy the City Note and $5,000 of the proceeds to be provided to the owner who is in financial hardship to assist with rehousing. Proceeds paid to the City will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Fund for future affordable housing purposes, and all restrictions on the home would be terminated.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby authorizes the City Manager to sign all documents necessary to authorize a reduction, in an amount not to exceed $125,000, of the principal and accrued interest owed on the promissory note with Ms. Heather Legan for the City-restricted property located at 318 S. Livermore, Unit 112, sufficient to allow for a market-priced sale 301
RESOLUTION NO. ________
and repayment of all tax and first mortgage liens owed, real estate and escrow fees, basic repair costs, and provide $5,000 of proceeds to the seller for rehousing.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on November 25, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
302
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.10
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing execution of a quitclaim deed to Karamjit Singh Nijjar for regranting abutter's rights at the new driveway location for the Fairfield Inn project located at 220 North Greenville Road.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing execution of a quitclaim deed to Karamjit Singh Nijjar for re-granting abutter's rights at the new driveway location for the Fairfield Inn project located at 220 North Greenville Road (also known as Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 8123 filed December 30, 2023) at the location specified in the quitclaim deed.

SUMMARY
Staff proposes to authorize execution of a quitclaim deed to re-grant abutter’s rights that were relinquished on those parcels that abut Greenville Road with the filing of Parcel Map 8123 in 2003 as depicted in the vicinity map (Attachment 1). With the development of the Fairfield Inn project fronting Greenville Road, the developer has requested right-in right-out driveway access to allow for entry and exit from the site at the driveway location as shown in the portion to be abandoned (Attachment 2) and described in the Plat and Legal Description of the quitclaim deed, Exhibit A to the resolution. Therefore, the City of Livermore (City) can summarily authorize the execution of the quitclaim deed re-granting abutter's rights at the new driveway location to Karamjit Singh Nijjar.

DISCUSSION
When a property is developed and or subdivided in areas where the site frontage is along a major street, it is the City’s policy to have the rights of access (abutter’s rights) relinquished and/or limited along these frontages. As Greenville Road is designated a major street in the General Plan, on December 30, 2003, with the filing of Parcel Map 8123, abutter’s rights were relinquished on those parcels that abut Greenville Road.

On February 4, 2020, the Livermore Planning Commission approved Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 18-009, which requested to develop the vacant 2.4-acre site with a four-story, 45 foot tall, approximately 303
57,663 square foot hotel, with 110 guest rooms, onsite parking, landscaping, new driveway along Greenville Road and associated site improvements. The Livermore Planning Commission determined the project, including the new driveway access along Greenville Road, was consistent with the General Plan as part of the SPDR 18-009 approval. Planning Commission Resolution 02-20 found implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project will reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Any potential environmental impacts of the City's re-grant of abutter’s rights to enable the driveway’s development have been conducted and no further California Environmental Quality Act analysis is required.

As part of the Fairfield Inn project, the developer has requested right-in right-out only driveway access to Greenville Road to allow for entry and exit from the site. The request was reviewed and approved by the City’s Traffic Engineer. The developer is currently in the process of building the project and staff is recommending the authorization of a quitclaim deed for the purposes of re-granting abutter’s rights to the project along Greenville Road at the location specified in the quitclaim deed. All other relinquishment of abutter’s rights along Greenville Road will remain in effect.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
There are no fiscal impacts to the City as a result of executing this Quitclaim Deed.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
9: Facilitate new development consistent with the City's General Plan

ATTACHMENTS

1. Vicinity Map

2. Re-granting Abutter's Rights - Driveway Locations

3. Resolution

4. Exhibit A - Quitclaim Deed, Abutter's Rights
Prepared by: Christopher Ferrel
Associate Civil Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
304
Project Location
This map is based on City of Livermore GIS
Information and reflects the most current information
at the time of this printing. The map is intended for
reference purposes only and the City and its staff is
not responsible for errors. 4,000 Livermore IT, GIS Services 666.7
1: NAD_1983_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Feet
333.33 Feet 0 666.7
Scale:

LIVERMORE — CALIFORNIA o
53" 4
0 — ‘A
0 pff
I
■ ■ ' w> Ta
)
z) 4

7. (
r sr
.)) ie et
z at -
RO '
s AAe* “ att * f
(
1 sy n
$
C t - e t
A 2
d?
o 1
i — o:

Wi "I
- Xase t
-
.. 1 1 fl I
ii-
■
-
Je is
■ -11 . d
— 7
1 \ 1ih,
the ig■
“5 *e, ■
1- O ■ *SOUTHFRONTRP 1
**-- f t
(ri -s
, 26 +4 Ft " 6
|
Tw""TP a,"
“Y a ■ (et in 22 %' )
8r
449 »
s
r r t vi d
vat
§
- • % s
d TS? 7 421 t C‘
z" ■■ 415 /
0* l a
hot
• L... 4a a f
t 2 wo ya, i
d
l
47 i e2 sI 8 s r § UAMEP
-an 2
RO p
C
2 <*
s
c G) si %% SAS RD /
4 % LASPO
30 %rt
t.o %
%% HWIUNE
J
f
6 ' O ,
t s
Ptaws NAMED
1 9
2 Z
0 y
wi
- ■
A05 .
h s
I(
—0., shr
F
or
L
■■. —2

3. p •
—
-
3 t
*
‘ 1y hle
*****
-owdh —
, %%
Saeed
LONGAY. ... at 2
La i
Csa aif
Pri .2 _ 7
77 1 —“f
x orP569 Sos
ANMl P
7{ -
is -
s.f JunnB*
S
cseume
. E.
e 7
y. d g - —0 o
%
UNNAME _, “53 x
2 4 ‘ , 5
d y-o. L A
pPP
4) I
/
K ' Jess 7 2P A
s
" A'
-esonl
ta 2 at
* -> - snpue® t
| 5 -
, 1..91 uS?0" “ — ..am=suli
K
t ’ y
--*s
aau
T-ir
i M. h
4 Hely
% I "y
2 ? X 9 I
14 Jhy 13 I."i
as
1 "I
. • 1480)2
so
k
-I
■
g
Ur
Y
FL : be
a ," '
rly
I •
7-
, wf
*
o ■■
yrr"
te
/aF 3
• w...“1 n.
fy eeMY,
53" 4
0 — ‘A
0 pff
I
■ ■ ' w> Ta
)
z) 4
7 (
r sr
.)) ie
z at RO '
s AAe* “ att *
(
1 sy
$
C t - e
A 2
d?
o
— o:
"I
- Xase W
.. fl I
ii-
■
-
■
. d
—
1 \
the “5 *e, ■
1- O ■ *SOUTHFRONTRP 1
**-- f
(ri -s
, 26 +4 Ft " 6
|
Tw""TP a,"
“Y a ■ in 22 %'
449 »
r r t s vi
vat
§
- • % s
d TS? 7 421 t C‘
z" ■■ 415
0* l a
hot
• L... 4a a
t 2 wo ya, i
d
l
47 i
sI 8
s r §
-an 2
RO C
2 f
6 ' O ,
t s
Ptaws NAMED
1 9
2 Z
0 y
wi
- ■
A05 .
h s
I(
—0., shr
F
or
L
■■. —2

3. p •
—
-
3 t
*
‘ 1y hle
*****
-owdh
—
Saeed
LONGAY.

La i
Csa aif
Pri .2 _ 7
77 1
x orP569 Sos
is -
s.f JunnB*
S
cseume
. E.
e 7
y. d g - —0 o
%
UNNAME _, “53 x
2 4 ‘ , 5
d y-o. L A
pPP
s
" A'
-esonl
ta 2 at
* -> - snpue® t
| 5 -
K
t ’ y
--*s
aau
% I "y
14 Jhy 13 I."i
as
1 "I
• 1480)2
so
k
-I
■
g
Ur
rly
I •
7-
*
o ■■
yrr"
te
/aF 3
• w...“
ATTACHMENT 1
305

FAIRFIELD INN - RE-GRANTING OF ABUTTERS RIGHTS
N/F: AHUJA ENTERPRISES LLC N GREENVILLE RD
LIVERMORE, CA 94551
APN :99B-8110-79
N/F: PPV PROPERTIES LLC
200 N S ST #RD
LIVERMORE, CA 94551 APN :99B-8110-81
N/F: CITY OF LIVERMORE SOUTHFRONT RD LIVERMORE, CA 94550 APN :99B-8110-45 N/F: KARPENKO FAMILY PARTNERS
200 GREENVILLE RD
LIVERMORE, CA 94551-5800 APN :99B-8110-80
GREENVILLE ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY (BOOK 274, PAGE 46 OF MAPS) RIABLE WIDTH DIVIDED ASPHALT

SOUTHFRONT ROAD
VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY (BOOK 274, PAGE 46 OF MAPS) VARIABLE WIDTH DIVIDED ASPHALT

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
-SOUTHEAST CORNER
PARCEL 1 PARCEL MAP 8123 BOOK 274, PAGE 46 OF MAPS

BEGINNING POINT OF
10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PARCEL MAP 8123
10' PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
INST. NO. 2004332709
12' RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT PARCEL MAP 8123
12' RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT PARCEL MAP 8123
24' RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT PARCEL MAP 8123
FOUND 2-1/2" DISK IN WELL
N 62°21'46" E 205.10'(M) N 61°52'15" E 205.095'(R)
N 62°21'46" E(M) N 61°52'15" E(R) 129.00'(M/R)
N 28°07'45" W 301.000'(R) N 27°38'18" W 301.00'(M)
N 27°38'16" W(M)
N 28°07'45" W(R)

89.81'(M)

90.607'(R)
(BASIS OF BEARING) N 19°10'57" W 470.192'(R) N 18°41'26" W 470.19'(M)

PORTION TO BE

ABANDONED
FOUND 1/2" CAPPED REBAR
(LS4238)
FOUND 5/8" REBAR

RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER RIGHTS
(HATCHED AREA)
R/W
R/W
R/W
R:1723.00'(M/R)
L:40.00'(M)
D:1°19'49"
CH:N 29°55'43" W(M)
CL:40.00'(M) C1
C2
C3
C4
ARC LENGTH: 18.07'(M/R)
SHEET 2 OF 2
ATTACHMENT 2
306
1 RESOLUTION NO. _______
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL
TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF LIVERMORE
1052 SOUTH LIVERMORE AVENUE
LIVERMORE, CA 94550

EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES
PURSUANT TO GOV.

CODE § 27383
____________________________________________________________________________ Space Above This Line for Recorder’s Use Only

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A QUITCLAIM DEED TO KARAMJIT SINGH NIJJAR TO RE-GRANT ABUTTER’S RIGHTS OF ACCESS FOR 220 NORTH GREENVILLE ROAD
(Fairfield Inn Project)
On February 4, 2020, the City of Livermore Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 02-20, granting final approval of Site Plan Design Review (“SPDR") 18- 009 for the development of a four-story, 45-foot tall, 57,663 square foot hotel consisting of 110 guest rooms on a vacant 2.4-acre site located at 220 North Greenville Road. The Planning Commission determined the project, including the new driveway, is consistent with the General Plan. The Planning Commission also found that the project conforms to all applicable Planned Development and Development Code standards and is consistent with the Design Standards and Guidelines.

The General Conditions of Approval for the project state that the development shall conform to the September 6, 2019 engineering considerations, which are also referenced as SPDR 18-009. Taken together, the City’s project approval requires development of a right-in/right-out only driveway onto Greenville Road from the project site at 220 North Greenville Road. As stated in the engineering considerations, abutters’ rights of access along Greenville Road were previously relinquished with Parcel Map 8123.

The developer has provided plats and a legal description for the partial re-grant of abutters’ rights of access consistent with the proposed development. This re-grant of rights is required to allow for the installation of the proposed driveway at the northeast corner of the site and the modification of the existing shared driveway at the southeast corner of the site. The re-granting of abutter’s rights shall be recorded prior to occupancy.

Therefore, to allow the Fairfield Inn Project to be developed as approved by the City, the City must re-grant abutter’s rights to Karamjit Singh Nijjar, which will allow the 307
2 RESOLUTION NO. _______
developer to construct the approved driveway. This grant will not affect any other abutter’s rights along Greenville Road. The City will benefit by issuing this quitclaim deed because it will facilitate development of the Fairfield Inn Project, bringing to the City taxes, jobs, and economic benefits.

As Planning Commission Resolution No. 02-20 found, implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project will reduce impacts to a less than significant level, and any potential environmental impacts of the City's re-grant of abutter’s rights of access to enable the driveway’s development have already been conducted and no further CEQA analysis is required.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to execute, on behalf of the City of Livermore, the quitclaim deed to Karamjit Singh Nijjar, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to re-grant abutter’s rights of access at the new driveway location, as specified in the quitclaim deed, for the Fairfield Inn project located at 220 North Greenville Road.

2. Directs the City Clerk to record this resolution in the Office of the Alameda County Recorder.

On motion of Council Member ___________________, seconded by Council Member ____________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on November 25, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ /s/ Molly A. O’Toole________________ Deborah L. Elam Molly A. O’Toole
City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Quitclaim Deed to Karamjit Singh Nijjar
308
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

AND
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Livermore
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
____________________________________________________________________________________________________ MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: The Undersigned grantor(s) declare(s):

CITY TRANSFER TAX $0.00
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ Release of easement
SURVEY MONUMENT FEE $0.00
R&T Code 11911 Value or consideration is less than $100 SAME AS ABOVE Computed on the consideration or value or property conveyed; OR computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ APN’s Exempt from filing fees per Government Code Section §§ 27383 & 6103 99B-8110-45

QUITCLAIM DEED

ABUTTER'S RIGHTS
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, City of Livermore, a Municipal Corporation, ("Grantor"), Hereby remises, releases, and quitclaims to Karamjit Singh Nijjar (“Grantee”) all interest in a portion of Abutter's Rights of access appurtenant to the real property in the City of Livermore (City), County of Alameda, State of California, identified in the attached Exhibits A and B.

The abutter's rights quitclaimed herein specifically relate to access to Greenville Road.

By recording this Quitclaim Deed, Grantee agrees to release and indemnify the Grantor from any and all liability associated with or arising out of the past, current, or future use of the Quitclaimed abutter’s rights, expect to the extent caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents, or its employees.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this deed on the date first above written.

SEE EXHIBITS “A” and “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF GRANTOR:

City of Livermore, a municipal corporation
__________________________________ Date:__________________ Signature:

By: Marianna Marysheva
Its: City Manager
EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 4
309
State of )
County of )
On before me,
, Notary Public (here insert name and title of the officer), personally appeared
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 4
310
EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 4
311
EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 4
312
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 5.11
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Judy Erlandson, Acting Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing execution of a purchase order with 72 Hour LLC dba National Auto Fleet Group for seven replacement Ford Hybrid Police Interceptor Utilities in an amount not-to-exceed $459,558.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council authorize issuance of a purchase order to 72 Hour LLC dba National Auto Fleet Group in Watsonville, California in an amount not-to-exceed $459,558 for seven 2025 hybrid Ford Police Interceptor Utilities.

SUMMARY
Based on the City of Livermore’s Fleet Policy and the 25-year Fleet Replacement Plan, it is time to replace eight existing police patrol vehicles. Staff has determined that the units that best meets the needs of the Police Department is the 2025 Ford Hybrid Police Interceptor Utility and National Auto Fleet Group is the local Sourcewell (formally National Joint Powers Alliance, NJPA) contractor for Ford Police vehicles in Watsonville, California.

DISCUSSION
The Police Department currently operates 38 marked patrol cars for community protection and emergency services. The City’s Fleet Policy recommends police patrol units be evaluated for replacement based on the following factors:

1. In service for four years or more.

2. Odometer reading greater than 85,000 miles.

3. Annual maintenance and operational costs.

4. Overall condition of the vehicle.

Seven patrol vehicles were identified for replacement during the budget preparation process for FY 2024-25. Four 2016 Ford Utility vehicles and three 2017 Ford Utility vehicles, were recommended for replacement due to the age, high mileage, increased operational costs, and the poor condition of the 313
vehicles. If these patrol vehicles are not replaced, the maintenance and operating costs, downtime, and out-of-service frequency will continue to increase, and it will have an adverse effect on the City’s ability to respond to emergency and routine response calls. Replacing these seven vehicles with the Ford Police Hybrid option will reduce fuel consumption as well as reduce vehicle emissions, which is in line with the City’s Climate Action Plan to reduce the fleet’s carbon footprint.

Under LMC Section 2.68.370 of the City’s Contract and Purchase Ordinance, the Administrative Services Director may purchase supplies and equipment without utilizing the quotation or bidding requirements of the Ordinance, if such purchases are based on an agreement or cooperative purchasing program entered into by any public agency or agencies situated within the state, regardless of whether the City is a named party to such an agreement or an actual participant in such a program. In such cases, the supplies and equipment purchased must be the same and be offered at the same price as the supplies, subject to the agreement or program and the underlying purchase must have been made using a quotation or bid procedure at least as restrictive as the City’s.

Staff recommends purchasing these replacement vehicles utilizing Sourcewell Acceptance and Award contract #091521-NAF. The Sourcewell bid procedure for the replacement vehicles meets the City’s municipal code requirement, and therefore, can be awarded to National Auto Fleet Group.

The Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program assists local governments in reducing costs through this government-to-government procurement service. This program is available to local government entities and qualifying non-profit corporations. The City of Livermore is currently a registered member.

The purchase through Sourcewell Acceptance and Award contract #091521-NAF will expedite the delivery of these replacement vehicles.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The replacement purchase of these seven vehicles is budgeted in the Fleet Services Internal Service Fund (730) for FY 2024-25 and is identified in the Fleet 25-Year replacement plan.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A City That Works
GOAL
14: Develop, operate, and maintain the City’s infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS

1. National Auto Fleet Group Sourcewell Contract

2. City of Livermore PD 2025 Quote

3. Resolution
Prepared by: Scott Kooreman
Public Works Supervisor
314
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
315
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 1
Solicitation Number: RFP #091521

CONTRACT
This Contract is between Sourcewell, 202 12th Street Northeast, P.O. Box 219, Staples, MN 56479 (Sourcewell) and 72 Hour LLC dba: National Auto Fleet Group, 490 Auto Center Drive, Watsonville, CA 95076 (Supplier).

Sourcewell is a State of Minnesota local government unit and service cooperative created under the laws of the State of Minnesota (Minnesota Statutes Section 123A.21) that offers cooperative procurement solutions to government entities. Participation is open to eligible federal, state/province, and municipal governmental entities, higher education, K-12 education, nonprofit, tribal government, and other public entities located in the United States and Canada.

Sourcewell issued a public solicitation for Automobiles, SUVs, Vans, and Light Trucks with Related Equipment and Accessories from which Supplier was awarded a contract.

Supplier desires to contract with Sourcewell to provide equipment, products, or services to Sourcewell and the entities that access Sourcewell’s cooperative purchasing contracts (Participating Entities).

1. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Contract is effective upon the date of the final signature below.

B. EXPIRATION DATE AND EXTENSION. This Contract expires November 8, 2025, unless it is cancelled sooner pursuant to Article 22. This Contract may be extended one additional year upon the request of Sourcewell and written agreement by Supplier.

C. SURVIVAL OF TERMS. Notwithstanding any expiration or termination of this Contract, all payment obligations incurred prior to expiration or termination will survive, as will the following: Articles 11 through 14 survive the expiration or cancellation of this Contract. All rights will cease upon expiration or termination of this Contract.

2. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES
A. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES. Supplier will provide the Equipment, Products, or Services as stated in its Proposal submitted under the Solicitation Number listed above. 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
316
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 2
Supplier’s Equipment, Products, or Services Proposal (Proposal) is attached and incorporated into this Contract.

All Equipment and Products provided under this Contract must be new and the current model.

Supplier may offer close-out or refurbished Equipment or Products if they are clearly indicated in Supplier’s product and pricing list. Unless agreed to by the Participating Entities in advance, Equipment or Products must be delivered as operational to the Participating Entity’s site.

This Contract offers an indefinite quantity of sales, and while substantial volume is anticipated, sales and sales volume are not guaranteed.

B. WARRANTY. Supplier warrants that all Equipment, Products, and Services furnished are free from liens and encumbrances, and are free from defects in design, materials, and workmanship.

In addition, Supplier warrants the Equipment, Products, and Services are suitable for and will perform in accordance with the ordinary use for which they are intended. Supplier’s dealers and distributors must agree to assist the Participating Entity in reaching a resolution in any dispute over warranty terms with the manufacturer. Any manufacturer’s warranty that extends beyond the expiration of the Supplier’s warranty will be passed on to the Participating Entity.

C. DEALERS, DISTRIBUTORS, AND/OR RESELLERS. Upon Contract execution and throughout the Contract term, Supplier must provide to Sourcewell a current means to validate or authenticate Supplier’s authorized dealers, distributors, or resellers relative to the Equipment, Products, and Services offered under this Contract, which will be incorporated into this Contract by reference. It is the Supplier’s responsibility to ensure Sourcewell receives the most current information.

3. PRICING
All Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract will be priced at or below the price stated in Supplier’s Proposal.

When providing pricing quotes to Participating Entities, all pricing quoted must reflect a Participating Entity’s total cost of acquisition. This means that the quoted cost is for delivered Equipment, Products, and Services that are operational for their intended purpose, and includes all costs to the Participating Entity’s requested delivery location.

Regardless of the payment method chosen by the Participating Entity, the total cost associated with any purchase option of the Equipment, Products, or Services must always be disclosed in the pricing quote to the applicable Participating Entity at the time of purchase.

A. SHIPPING AND SHIPPING COSTS. All delivered Equipment and Products must be properly packaged. Damaged Equipment and Products may be rejected. If the damage is not readily apparent at the time of delivery, Supplier must permit the Equipment and Products to be 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
317
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 3
returned within a reasonable time at no cost to Sourcewell or its Participating Entities.

Participating Entities reserve the right to inspect the Equipment and Products at a reasonable time after delivery where circumstances or conditions prevent effective inspection of the Equipment and Products at the time of delivery. In the event of the delivery of nonconforming Equipment and Products, the Participating Entity will notify the Supplier as soon as possible and the Supplier will replace nonconforming Equipment and Products with conforming Equipment and Products that are acceptable to the Participating Entity.

Supplier must arrange for and pay for the return shipment on Equipment and Products that arrive in a defective or inoperable condition.

Sourcewell may declare the Supplier in breach of this Contract if the Supplier intentionally delivers substandard or inferior Equipment or Products.

B. SALES TAX. Each Participating Entity is responsible for supplying the Supplier with valid taxexemption certification(s). When ordering, a Participating Entity must indicate if it is a taxexempt entity.

C. HOT LIST PRICING. At any time during this Contract, Supplier may offer a specific selection of Equipment, Products, or Services at discounts greater than those listed in the Contract.

When Supplier determines it will offer Hot List Pricing, it must be submitted electronically to Sourcewell in a line-item format. Equipment, Products, or Services may be added or removed from the Hot List at any time through a Sourcewell Price and Product Change Form as defined in Article 4 below.

Hot List program and pricing may also be used to discount and liquidate close-out and discontinued Equipment and Products as long as those close-out and discontinued items are clearly identified as such. Current ordering process and administrative fees apply. Hot List Pricing must be published and made available to all Participating Entities.

4. PRODUCT AND PRICING CHANGE REQUESTS
Supplier may request Equipment, Product, or Service changes, additions, or deletions at any time. All requests must be made in writing by submitting a signed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form to the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator. This approved form is available from the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator.

At a minimum, the request must:
x Identify the applicable Sourcewell contract number;
x Clearly specify the requested change;
x Provide sufficient detail to justify the requested change; 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
318
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 4
x Individually list all Equipment, Products, or Services affected by the requested change, along with the requested change (e.g., addition, deletion, price change); and x Include a complete restatement of pricing documentation in Microsoft Excel with the effective date of the modified pricing, or product addition or deletion. The new pricing restatement must include all Equipment, Products, and Services offered, even for those items where pricing remains unchanged.

A fully executed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form will become an amendment to this Contract and will be incorporated by reference.

5. PARTICIPATION, CONTRACT ACCESS, AND PARTICIPATING ENTITY REQUIREMENTS A. PARTICIPATION. Sourcewell’s cooperative contracts are available and open to public and nonprofit entities across the United States and Canada; such as federal, state/province, municipal, K-12 and higher education, tribal government, and other public entities.

The benefits of this Contract should be available to all Participating Entities that can legally access the Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract. A Participating Entity’s authority to access this Contract is determined through its cooperative purchasing, interlocal, or joint powers laws. Any entity accessing benefits of this Contract will be considered a Service Member of Sourcewell during such time of access. Supplier understands that a Participating Entity’s use of this Contract is at the Participating Entity’s sole convenience and Participating Entities reserve the right to obtain like Equipment, Products, or Services from any other source.

Supplier is responsible for familiarizing its sales and service forces with Sourcewell contract use eligibility requirements and documentation and will encourage potential participating entities to join Sourcewell. Sourcewell reserves the right to add and remove Participating Entities to its roster during the term of this Contract.

B. PUBLIC FACILITIES. Supplier’s employees may be required to perform work at governmentowned facilities, including schools. Supplier’s employees and agents must conduct themselves in a professional manner while on the premises, and in accordance with Participating Entity policies and procedures, and all applicable laws.

6. PARTICIPATING ENTITY USE AND PURCHASING
A. ORDERS AND PAYMENT. To access the contracted Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract, a Participating Entity must clearly indicate to Supplier that it intends to access this Contract; however, order flow and procedure will be developed jointly between Sourcewell and Supplier. Typically, a Participating Entity will issue an order directly to Supplier or its authorized subsidiary, distributor, dealer, or reseller. If a Participating Entity issues a purchase order, it may use its own forms, but the purchase order should clearly note the applicable Sourcewell 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
319
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 5
contract number. All Participating Entity orders under this Contract must be issued prior to expiration or cancellation of this Contract; however, Supplier performance, Participating Entity payment obligations, and any applicable warranty periods or other Supplier or Participating Entity obligations may extend beyond the term of this Contract.

Supplier’s acceptable forms of payment are included in its attached Proposal. Participating Entities will be solely responsible for payment and Sourcewell will have no liability for any unpaid invoice of any Participating Entity.

B. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS/PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM. Additional terms and conditions to a purchase order, or other required transaction documentation, may be negotiated between a Participating Entity and Supplier, such as job or industry-specific requirements, legal requirements (e.g., affirmative action or immigration status requirements), or specific local policy requirements. Some Participating Entities may require the use of a Participating Addendum; the terms of which will be negotiated directly between the Participating Entity and the Supplier. Any negotiated additional terms and conditions must never be less favorable to the Participating Entity than what is contained in this Contract.

C. SPECIALIZED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS. In the event that the Participating Entity requires service or specialized performance requirements not addressed in this Contract (such as ecommerce specifications, specialized delivery requirements, or other specifications and requirements), the Participating Entity and the Supplier may enter into a separate, standalone agreement, apart from this Contract. Sourcewell, including its agents and employees, will not be made a party to a claim for breach of such agreement.

D. TERMINATION OF ORDERS. Participating Entities may terminate an order, in whole or in part, immediately upon notice to Supplier in the event of any of the following events:

1. The Participating Entity fails to receive funding or appropriation from its governing body at levels sufficient to pay for the equipment, products, or services to be purchased; or

2. Federal, state, or provincial laws or regulations prohibit the purchase or change the Participating Entity’s requirements.

E. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. The governing law and venue for any action related to a Participating Entity’s order will be determined by the Participating Entity making the purchase.

7. CUSTOMER SERVICE
A. PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE. Supplier will assign an Account Representative to Sourcewell for this Contract and must provide prompt notice to Sourcewell if that person is changed. The Account Representative will be responsible for:





 






ATTACHMENT 1
320
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 6
x Maintenance and management of this Contract;
x Timely response to all Sourcewell and Participating Entity inquiries; and x Business reviews to Sourcewell and Participating Entities, if applicable.

B. BUSINESS REVIEWS. Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

8. REPORT ON CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEE PAYMENT A. CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY REPORT. Each calendar quarter, Supplier must provide a contract sales activity report (Report) to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract. Reports are due no later than 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. A Report must be provided regardless of the number or amount of sales during that quarter (i.e., if there are no sales, Supplier must submit a report indicating no sales were made).

The Report must contain the following fields:
x Participating Entity Name (e.g., City of Staples Highway Department); x Participating Entity Physical Street Address;
x Participating Entity City;
x Participating Entity State/Province;
x Participating Entity Zip/Postal Code;
x Participating Entity Contact Name;
x Participating Entity Contact Email Address;
x Participating Entity Contact Telephone Number;
x Sourcewell Assigned Entity/Participating Entity Number; x Item Purchased Description;
x Item Purchased Price;
x Sourcewell Administrative Fee Applied; and
x Date Purchase was invoiced/sale was recognized as revenue by Supplier.

B. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE. In consideration for the support and services provided by Sourcewell, the Supplier will pay an administrative fee to Sourcewell on all Equipment, Products, and Services provided to Participating Entities. The Administrative Fee must be included in, and not added to, the pricing. Supplier may not charge Participating Entities more than the contracted price to offset the Administrative Fee.

The Supplier will submit payment to Sourcewell for the percentage of administrative fee stated in the Proposal multiplied by the total sales of all Equipment, Products, and Services purchased 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
321
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 7
by Participating Entities under this Contract during each calendar quarter. Payments should note the Supplier’s name and Sourcewell-assigned contract number in the memo; and must be mailed to the address above “Attn: Accounts Receivable” or remitted electronically to Sourcewell’s banking institution per Sourcewell’s Finance department instructions. Payments must be received no later than 45 calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter.

Supplier agrees to cooperate with Sourcewell in auditing transactions under this Contract to ensure that the administrative fee is paid on all items purchased under this Contract.

In the event the Supplier is delinquent in any undisputed administrative fees, Sourcewell reserves the right to cancel this Contract and reject any proposal submitted by the Supplier in any subsequent solicitation. In the event this Contract is cancelled by either party prior to the Contract’s expiration date, the administrative fee payment will be due no more than 30 days from the cancellation date.

9. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Sourcewell's Authorized Representative is its Chief Procurement Officer.

Supplier’s Authorized Representative is the person named in the Supplier’s Proposal. If Supplier’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Contract, Supplier must promptly notify Sourcewell in writing.

10. AUDIT, ASSIGNMENT, AMENDMENTS, WAIVER, AND CONTRACT COMPLETE A. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by Sourcewell or the Minnesota State Auditor for a minimum of six years from the end of this Contract. This clause extends to Participating Entities as it relates to business conducted by that Participating Entity under this Contract.

B. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations under this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party and a fully executed assignment agreement. Such consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any prohibited assignment will be invalid.

C. AMENDMENTS. Any amendment to this Contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been duly executed by the parties.

D. WAIVER. Failure by either party to take action or assert any right under this Contract will not be deemed a waiver of such right in the event of the continuation or repetition of the circumstances giving rise to such right. Any such waiver must be in writing and signed by the parties.




 






ATTACHMENT 1
322
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 8
E. CONTRACT COMPLETE. This Contract represents the complete agreement between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.For any conflict between the attached Proposal and the terms set out in Articles 1-22 of this Contract, the terms of Articles 1-22 will govern.

F. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The relationship of the parties is one of independent contractors, each free to exercise judgment and discretion with regard to the conduct of their respective businesses. This Contract does not create a partnership, joint venture, or any other relationship such as master-servant, or principal-agent.

11. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS
Supplier must indemnify, defend, save, and hold Sourcewell and its Participating Entities, including their agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorneys’ fees incurred by Sourcewell or its Participating Entities, arising out of any act or omission in the performance of this Contract by the Supplier or its agents or employees; this indemnification includes injury or death to person(s) or property alleged to have been caused by some defect in the Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract to the extent the Equipment, Product, or Service has been used according to its specifications. Sourcewell’s responsibility will be governed by the State of Minnesota’s Tort Liability Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466) and other applicable law.

12. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES
Supplier and Sourcewell must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by or provided to Sourcewell under this Contract and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Supplier under this Contract.

13. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PUBLICITY, MARKETING, AND ENDORSEMENT A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

1. Grant of License. During the term of this Contract:
a. Sourcewell grants to Supplier a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to use thetrademark(s) provided to Supplier by Sourcewell in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing Sourcewell’s relationship with Supplier.
b. Supplier grants to Sourcewell a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to use Supplier’s trademarks in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing Supplier’s relationship with Sourcewell.

2. Limited Right of Sublicense. The right and license granted herein includes a limited right of each party to grant sublicenses to their respective subsidiaries, distributors, dealers, 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
323
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 9
resellers, marketing representatives, and agents (collectively “Permitted Sublicensees”) in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing the Parties’ relationship to Participating Entities. Any sublicense granted will be subject to the terms and conditions of this Article. Each party will be responsible for any breach of this Article by any of their respective sublicensees.

3. Use; Quality Control.
a. Neither party may alter the other party’s trademarks from the form provided and must comply with removal requests as to specific uses of its trademarks or logos.
b. Each party agrees to use, and to cause its Permitted Sublicensees to use, the other party’s trademarks only in good faith and in a dignified manner consistent with such party’s use of the trademarks. Upon written notice to the breaching party, the breaching party has 30 days of the date of the written notice to cure the breach or the license will be terminated.

4. As applicable, Supplier agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Sourcewell and its Participating Entities against any and all suits, claims, judgments, and costs instituted or recovered against Sourcewell or Participating Entities by any person on account of the use of any Equipment or Products by Sourcewell or its Participating Entities supplied by Supplier in violation of applicable patent or copyright laws.

5. Termination. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, each party, including Permitted Sublicensees, will have 30 days to remove all Trademarks from signage, websites, and the like bearing the other party’s name or logo (excepting Sourcewell’s pre-printed catalog of suppliers which may be used until the next printing). Supplier must return all marketing and promotional materials, including signage, provided by Sourcewell, or dispose of it according to Sourcewell’s written directions.

B. PUBLICITY. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this Contract must not be released without prior written approval from the Authorized Representatives. Publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Supplier individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this Contract.

C. MARKETING. Any direct advertising, marketing, or offers with Participating Entities must be approved by Sourcewell. Send all approval requests to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract.

D. ENDORSEMENT. The Supplier must not claim that Sourcewell endorses its Equipment, Products, or Services.




 






ATTACHMENT 1
324
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 10

14. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
The substantive and procedural laws of the State of Minnesota will govern this Contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state court in Todd County, Minnesota or federal court in Fergus Falls, Minnesota.

15. FORCE MAJEURE
Neither party to this Contract will be held responsible for delay or default caused by acts of God or other conditions that are beyond that party’s reasonable control. A party defaulting under this provision must provide the other party prompt written notice of the default.

16. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Contract is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, unenforceable, or void then both parties will be relieved from all obligations arising from that provision. If the remainder of this Contract is capable of being performed, it will not be affected by such determination or finding and must be fully performed.

17. PERFORMANCE, DEFAULT, AND REMEDIES
A. PERFORMANCE. During the term of this Contract, the parties will monitor performance and address unresolved contract issues as follows:

1. Notification. The parties must promptly notify each other of any known dispute and work in good faith to resolve such dispute within a reasonable period of time. If necessary, Sourcewell and the Supplier will jointly develop a short briefing document that describes the issue(s), relevant impact, and positions of both parties.

2. Escalation. If parties are unable to resolve the issue in a timely manner, as specified above, either Sourcewell or Supplier may escalate the resolution of the issue to a higher level of management. The Supplier will have 30 calendar days to cure an outstanding issue.

3. Performance while Dispute is Pending. Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.

B. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. Either of the following constitutes cause to declare this Contract, or any Participating Entity order under this Contract, in default:

1. Nonperformance of contractual requirements, or

2. A material breach of any term or condition of this Contract. 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
325
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 11
The party claiming default must provide written notice of the default, with 30 calendar days to cure the default. Time allowed for cure will not diminish or eliminate any liability for liquidated or other damages. If the default remains after the opportunity for cure, the non-defaulting party may:
x Exercise any remedy provided by law or equity, or
x Terminate the Contract or any portion thereof, including any orders issued against the Contract.

18. INSURANCE
A. REQUIREMENTS. At its own expense, Supplier must maintain insurance policy(ies) in effect at all times during the performance of this Contract with insurance company(ies) licensed or authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota having an “AM BEST” rating of A- or better, with coverage and limits of insurance not less than the following:

1. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability.

Workers’ Compensation: As required by any applicable law or regulation.

Employer's Liability Insurance: must be provided in amounts not less than listed below:

Minimum limits:
$500,000 each accident for bodily injury by accident
$500,000 policy limit for bodily injury by disease
$500,000 each employee for bodily injury by disease

2. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Supplier will maintain insurance covering its operations, with coverage on an occurrence basis, and must be subject to terms no less broad than the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Commercial General Liability Form CG0001 (2001 or newer edition), or equivalent. At a minimum, coverage must include liability arising from premises, operations, bodily injury and property damage, independent contractors, products-completed operations including construction defect, contractual liability, blanket contractual liability, and personal injury and advertising injury. All required limits, terms and conditions of coverage must be maintained during the term of this Contract.

Minimum Limits:
$1,000,000 each occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury
$2,000,000 aggregate for Products-Completed operations
$2,000,000 general aggregate

3. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain insurance covering all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles in limits of liability not less than indicated below. The coverage must be subject to terms 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
326
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 12
no less broad than ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 0001 (2010 edition or newer), or equivalent.

Minimum Limits:
$1,000,000 each accident, combined single limit

4. Umbrella Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain umbrella coverage over Employer’s Liability, Commercial General Liability, and Commercial Automobile.

Minimum Limits:
$2,000,000

5. Network Security and Privacy Liability Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain coverage for network security and privacy liability. The coverage may be endorsed on another form of liability coverage or written on a standalone policy. The insurance must cover claims which may arise from failure of Supplier’s security resulting in, but not limited to, computer attacks, unauthorized access, disclosure of not public data – including but not limited to, confidential or private information, transmission of a computer virus, or denial of service.

Minimum limits:
$2,000,000 per occurrence
$2,000,000 annual aggregate
Failure of Supplier to maintain the required insurance will constitute a material breach entitling Sourcewell to immediately terminate this Contract for default.

B. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE. Prior to commencing under this Contract, Supplier must furnish to Sourcewell a certificate of insurance, as evidence of the insurance required under this Contract. Prior to expiration of the policy(ies), renewal certificates must be mailed to Sourcewell, 202 12th Street Northeast, P.O. Box 219, Staples, MN 56479 or sent to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract. The certificates must be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on their behalf.

Failure to request certificates of insurance by Sourcewell, or failure of Supplier to provide certificates of insurance, in no way limits or relieves Supplier of its duties and responsibilities in this Contract.

C. ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AND PRIMARY AND NON-CONTRIBUTORY INSURANCE CLAUSE. Supplier agrees to list Sourcewell and its Participating Entities, including their officers, agents, and employees, as an additional insured under the Supplier’s commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to liability arising out of activities, “operations,” or “work” performed by or on behalf of Supplier, and products and completed operations of Supplier. The policy provision(s) or endorsement(s) must further provide that coverage is 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
327
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 13
primary and not excess over or contributory with any other valid, applicable, and collectible insurance or self-insurance in force for the additional insureds.

D. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION. Supplier waives and must require (by endorsement or otherwise) all its insurers to waive subrogation rights against Sourcewell and other additional insureds for losses paid under the insurance policies required by this Contract or other insurance applicable to the Supplier or its subcontractors. The waiver must apply to all deductibles and/or self-insured retentions applicable to the required or any other insurance maintained by the Supplier or its subcontractors. Where permitted by law, Supplier must require similar written express waivers of subrogation and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.

E. UMBRELLA/EXCESS LIABILITY/SELF-INSURED RETENTION. The limits required by this Contract can be met by either providing a primary policy or in combination with umbrella/excess liability policy(ies), or self-insured retention.

19. COMPLIANCE
A. LAWS AND REGULATIONS. All Equipment, Products, or Services provided under this Contract must comply fully with applicable federal laws and regulations, and with the laws in the states and provinces in which the Equipment, Products, or Services are sold.

B. LICENSES. Supplier must maintain a valid and current status on all required federal, state/provincial, and local licenses, bonds, and permits required for the operation of the business that the Supplier conducts with Sourcewell and Participating Entities.

20. BANKRUPTCY, DEBARMENT, OR SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
Supplier certifies and warrants that it is not in bankruptcy or that it has previously disclosed in writing certain information to Sourcewell related to bankruptcy actions. If at any time during this Contract Supplier declares bankruptcy, Supplier must immediately notify Sourcewell in writing.

Supplier certifies and warrants that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from programs operated by the State of Minnesota; the United States federal government or the Canadian government, as applicable; or any Participating Entity. Supplier certifies and warrants that neither it nor its principals have been convicted of a criminal offense related to the subject matter of this Contract. Supplier further warrants that it will provide immediate written notice to Sourcewell if this certification changes at any time. 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
328
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 14

21. PROVISIONS FOR NON-UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENTITY PROCUREMENTS UNDER

UNITED STATES FEDERAL AWARDS OR OTHER AWARDS
Participating Entities that use United States federal grant or FEMA funds to purchase goods or services from this Contract may be subject to additional requirements including the procurement standards of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. § 200. Participating Entities may have additional requirements based on specific funding source terms or conditions. Within this Article, all references to “federal” should be interpreted to mean the United States federal government.

The following list only applies when a Participating Entity accesses Supplier’s Equipment, Products, or Services with United States federal funds.

A. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. Except as otherwise provided under 41 C.F.R. § 60, all contracts that meet the definition of “federally assisted construction contract” in 41 C.F.R. § 60-

1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 C.F.R. §60-1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity” (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 C.F.R. §, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and implementing regulations at 41 C.F.R. § 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.” The equal opportunity clause is incorporated herein by reference.

B. DAVIS-BACON ACT, AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C. § 3141-3148). When required by federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by nonfederal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. § 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the federal awarding agency. Supplier must be in compliance with all applicable Davis-Bacon Act provisions. 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
329
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 15
C. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C. § 3701-3708). Where applicable, all contracts awarded by the non-federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. §§ 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 5).

Under 40 U.S.C. § 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. § 3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. This provision is hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. Supplier certifies that during the term of an award for all contracts by Sourcewell resulting from this procurement process, Supplier must comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.

D. RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT. If the federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 C.F.R. § 401.2(a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. Supplier certifies that during the term of an award for all contracts by Sourcewell resulting from this procurement process, Supplier must comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.

E. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. § 7401-7671Q.) AND THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (33 U.S.C. § 1251-1387). Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 require the non-federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401- 7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1251- 1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract will comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.

F. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (EXECUTIVE ORDERS 12549 AND 12689). A contract award (see 2 C.F.R. § 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 C.F.R. §180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 C.F.R. § 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 C.F.R. § 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
330
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 16
of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Supplier certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation by any federal department or agency.

G. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED (31 U.S.C. § 1352). Suppliers must file any required certifications. Suppliers must not have used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Suppliers must disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-federal award. Suppliers must file all certifications and disclosures required by, and otherwise comply with, the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. § 1352).

H. RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with the record retention requirements detailed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.333. The Supplier further certifies that it will retain all records as required by 2 C.F.R. § 200.333 for a period of 3 years after grantees or subgrantees submit final expenditure reports or quarterly or annual financial reports, as applicable, and all other pending matters are closed.

I. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT COMPLIANCE. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with the mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.

J. BUY AMERICAN PROVISIONS COMPLIANCE. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with all applicable provisions of the Buy American Act. Purchases made in accordance with the Buy American Act must follow the applicable procurement rules calling for free and open competition.

K. ACCESS TO RECORDS (2 C.F.R. § 200.336). Supplier agrees that duly authorized representatives of a federal agency must have access to any books, documents, papers and records of Supplier that are directly pertinent to Supplier’s discharge of its obligations under this Contract for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. The right also includes timely and reasonable access to Supplier’s personnel for the purpose of interview and discussion relating to such documents.

L. PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS (2 C.F.R. § 200.322). A non-federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
331
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 17
and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 C.F.R. § 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.

M. FEDERAL SEAL(S), LOGOS, AND FLAGS. The Supplier not use the seal(s), logos, crests, or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Federal agency officials without specific pre-approval.

N. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The U.S. federal government is not a party to this Contract or any purchase by an Participating Entity and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Participating Entity, Supplier, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the Contract or any purchase by an authorized user.

O. PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OR RELATED ACTS. The Contractor acknowledges that 31 U.S.C. 38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements) applies to the Supplier’s actions pertaining to this Contract or any purchase by a Participating Entity.

P. FEDERAL DEBT. The Supplier certifies that it is non-delinquent in its repayment of any federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowance, and benefit overpayments.

Q. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. The Supplier must notify the U.S. Office of General Services, Sourcewell, and Participating Entity as soon as possible if this Contract or any aspect related to the anticipated work under this Contract raises an actual or potential conflict of interest (as described in 2 C.F.R. Part 200). The Supplier must explain the actual or potential conflict in writing in sufficient detail so that the U.S. Office of General Services, Sourcewell, and Participating Entity are able to assess the actual or potential conflict; and provide any additional information as necessary or requested.

R. U.S. EXECUTIVE ORDER 13224. The Supplier, and its subcontractors, must comply with U.S. Executive Order 13224 and U.S. Laws that prohibit transactions with and provision of resources and support to individuals and organizations associated with terrorism.

S. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT. To the extent applicable, Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract it will comply with applicable requirements of 2 C.F.R. § 200.216.

T. DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS. To the extent applicable, Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract will comply with applicable requirements of 2 C.F.R. § 200.322. 



 






ATTACHMENT 1
332
091521-NAF
Rev. 3/2021 18

22. CANCELLATION
Sourcewell or Supplier may cancel this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party. However, Sourcewell may cancel this Contract immediately upon discovery of a material defect in any certification made in Supplier’s Proposal. Cancellation of this Contract does not relieve either party of financial, product, or service obligations incurred or accrued prior to cancellation.

Sourcewell 72 Hour LLC dba: National Auto
Fleet Group
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Jeremy Schwartz Jesse Cooper
Title: Chief Procurement Officer Title: Fleet Manager
Date: ________________________ Date: ________________________ Approved:

By: __________________________
Chad Coauette
Title: Executive Director/CEO
Date: ________________________




 







 

 








ATTACHMENT 1
333
5)3
$XWRPRELOHV689V9DQVDQG/LJKW7UXFNVZLWK
5HODWHG(TXLSPHQWDQG$FFHVVRULHV
9HQGRU'HWDLOV
&RPSDQ\1DPH
+285//&
'RHV\RXUFRPSDQ\FRQGXFW
EXVLQHVVXQGHUDQ\RWKHUQDPH",I
\HVSOHDVHVWDWH

1DWLRQDO$XWR)OHHW*URXS
$GGUHVV


$XWR&HQWHU'ULYH
:DWVRQYLOOH&$

&RQWDFW
-HVVH&RRSHU
(PDLO
-FRRSHU#QDWLRQDODXWRIOHHWJURXSFRP
3KRQH


)D[


+67


6XEPLVVLRQ'HWDLOV
&UHDWHG2Q
7XHVGD\$XJXVW


6XEPLWWHG2Q
7XHVGD\6HSWHPEHU


6XEPLWWHG%\
-HVVH&RRSHU
(PDLO
-FRRSHU#QDWLRQDODXWRIOHHWJURXSFRP
7UDQVDFWLRQ
GH
GHHI
EEHIGEG
6XEPLWWHU
V,3$GGUHVV

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
334
6SHFLILFDWLRQV
7DEOH
3URSRVHU,GHQWLW\ $XWKRUL]HG5HSUHVHQWDWLYHV
*HQHUDO,QVWUXFWLRQV
DSSOLHVWRDOO7DEOHV
6RXUFHZHOOSUHIHUVDEULHIEXWWKRURXJKUHVSRQVHWRHDFKTXHVWLRQ'RQRWPHUHO\DWWDFKDGGLWLRQDOGRFXPHQWVWR\RXU UHVSRQVHZLWKRXWDOVRSURYLGLQJDVXEVWDQWLYHUHVSRQVH'RQRWOHDYHDQVZHUVEODQN UHVSRQG³1$´LIWKHTXHVWLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\WR\RX
SUHIHUDEO\ZLWKDQ
H[SODQDWLRQ

/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 3URSRVHUௐ/HJDOௐ1DPHௐ
RQHௐOHJDOௐHQWLW\ௐRQO\

ௐௐ
,QௐWKHௐ
HYHQWௐRIௐDZDUGௐZLOOௐH[HFXWHௐWKHௐUHVXOWLQJௐFRQWUDFWௐ
DVௐ6XSSOLHU

ௐ+RXUௐ//&


 ,GHQWLI\ௐDOOௐVXEVLGLDU\ௐHQWLWLHVௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐZKRVHௐ HTXLSPHQWௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐDUHௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐWKHௐ
3URSRVDO
:&$)ௐ//&
:&'-5ௐ//&
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ$XWRPRWLYHௐ,QF


 ,GHQWLI\ௐDOOௐDSSOLFDEOHௐDVVXPHGௐQDPHVௐRUௐ'%$ௐQDPHVௐRIௐ WKHௐ3URSRVHUௐRUௐ3URSRVHU
VௐVXEVLGLDULHVௐLQௐ/LQHௐௐRUௐ
/LQHௐௐDERYH
1$)*ௐKDVௐQXPHURXVௐVXEVLGLDULHVௐDQGௐ'%$
VௐLQFOXGLQJௐEXWௐQRWௐOLPLWHGௐWR

1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐ
&KHYUROHWௐRIௐ:DWVRQYLOOH
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ)RUG
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ&'-5
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ)OHHWௐ*URXS
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ&KU\VOHUௐ-HHSௐ,QF
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ&KHYUROHWௐ&DGLOODF
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ%XLFNௐ*0&
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ$XWRௐ2XWOHW
&OHZLVWRQௐ0RWRUௐ&RPSDQ\ௐ,QF
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ&KU\VOHUௐ'RGJHௐ5DPௐ-HHS
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ/LQFROQ
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ)RUG
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ1LVVDQ
$ODQௐ-D\ௐ7R\RWD


 3URSRVHUௐ3K\VLFDOௐ$GGUHVV

ௐ$XWRௐ&HQWHUௐ'ULYH
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ&$ௐ
 

 3URSRVHUௐZHEVLWHௐDGGUHVVௐ
RUௐDGGUHVVHV

ZZZ1DWLRQDO$XWR)OHHW*URXSFRP 

 3URSRVHU
Vௐ$XWKRUL]HGௐ5HSUHVHQWDWLYHௐ
QDPHௐWLWOHௐ
DGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH
ௐ
7KHௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐ
PXVWௐKDYHௐDXWKRULW\ௐWRௐVLJQௐWKHௐ³3URSRVHU¶Vௐ$VVXUDQFHௐ
RIௐ&RPSOLDQFH´ௐRQௐEHKDOIௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐDQGௐLQௐWKHௐ
HYHQWௐRIௐDZDUGௐZLOOௐEHௐH[SHFWHGௐWRௐH[HFXWHௐWKHௐUHVXOWLQJௐ

FRQWUDFW

-HVVHௐ&RRSHU
)OHHWௐ0DQDJHU



ௐ$XWRௐ&HQWHUௐ'ULYH
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ&$ௐ

-FRRSHU#QDWLRQDODXWRIOHHWJURXSFRP


 3URSRVHU
VௐSULPDU\ௐFRQWDFWௐIRUௐWKLVௐSURSRVDOௐ
QDPHௐWLWOHௐ
DGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH

-HVVHௐ&RRSHU
)OHHWௐ0DQDJHU



ௐ$XWRௐ&HQWHUௐ'ULYH
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ&$ௐ

-FRRSHU#QDWLRQDODXWRIOHHWJURXSFRP


 3URSRVHU
VௐRWKHUௐFRQWDFWVௐIRUௐWKLVௐSURSRVDOௐLIௐDQ\ௐ

QDPHௐWLWOHௐDGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH

&ODUNHௐ&RRSHU
)OHHWௐ0DQJHU



ௐ$XWRௐ&HQWHUௐ'ULYH
:DWVRQYLOOHௐ&$ௐ

&ODUNH&RRSHU#ZDWVRQYLOOHIOHHWJURXSFRP
7DEOH
&RPSDQ\,QIRUPDWLRQDQG)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWK
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
335

3URYLGHௐDௐEULHIௐKLVWRU\ௐRIௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLQFOXGLQJௐ\RXUௐ FRPSDQ\¶VௐFRUHௐYDOXHVௐEXVLQHVVௐSKLORVRSK\ௐDQGௐ
LQGXVWU\ௐORQJHYLW\ௐUHODWHGௐWRௐWKHௐUHTXHVWHGௐHTXLSPHQWௐ SURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHV
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐVWDUWHGௐDVௐDௐQHZௐGLYLVLRQௐRIௐௐ+RXUௐ//&ௐLQௐWKHௐVXPPHUௐRIௐௐLQௐWKHௐ KHDUWௐRIௐ6RXWKHUQௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐ:HௐEHJDQௐRXUௐQHWZRUNௐZLWKௐDௐVLQJOHௐDXWRPRELOHௐGHDOHUVKLSௐDQGௐKDYHௐQRZௐ JURZQௐRXUௐQHWZRUNௐWRௐHQFRPSDVVௐQXPHURXVௐGHDOHUVKLSVௐORFDWHGௐLQௐDQGௐRXWVLGHௐRIௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐ :HௐVWDQGௐE\ௐSURYLGLQJௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐIRUௐDGYDQFHPHQWௐE\ௐKLULQJௐDQGௐSURPRWLQJௐIURPௐZLWKLQௐRXUௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQௐ0DQ\ௐRIௐWKHௐ)OHHWௐ0DQDJHUVௐZKRௐVWDUWHGௐZLWKௐXVௐLQௐௐDUHௐVWLOOௐZLWKௐXVௐWRGD\ௐ 7KURXJKௐWKHௐ\HDUVௐZHௐKDYHௐHYROYHGௐDQGௐDGDSWHGௐWRௐWKHௐQHZௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐGULYHQௐWUHQGVௐWKDWௐDUHௐ UHYROXWLRQL]LQJௐWKHௐDXWRPRWLYHௐLQGXVWU\ௐWRGD\ௐ+RZHYHUௐRXUௐEUDQG¶VௐIXQGDPHQWDOௐFRUHௐYDOXHVௐKDYHௐ UHPDLQHGௐXQFKDQJHGௐ±ௐ:HௐDUHௐFRPPLWWHGௐWRௐGRௐULJKWௐIRUௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐ,IௐZHௐWDNHௐFDUHௐRIௐWKHPௐWKH\ௐ ZLOOௐLQௐUHWXUQௐWDNHௐFDUHௐRIௐXVௐ
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXS¶VௐRSHUDWLRQDOௐEOXHSULQWௐDQGௐEXVLQHVVௐSKLORVRSK\ௐKDVௐDOZD\VௐEHHQௐWKHௐ³ௐ 5,*+7¶V´ௐIRUௐHYHU\ௐPHPEHU
ௐ:HௐGHOLYHUௐWKHௐ5,*+7ௐYHKLFOHௐDWௐWKHௐ5,*+7ௐWLPHௐWRௐWKHௐ5,*+7ௐSODFHௐDWௐ WKHௐ5,*+7ௐSULFHௐ
7KHௐLQWHJULW\ௐRIௐRXUௐEXVLQHVVௐVWHPVௐRQௐRXUௐGHHSௐIDPLO\ௐURRWVௐLQௐWKHௐDXWRPRWLYHௐLQGXVWU\ௐ:HௐDUHௐDQGௐ DOZD\VௐZLOOௐEHௐIDPLO\ௐRZQHGௐDQGௐRSHUDWHGௐZLWKௐRXUௐIXWXUHௐJHQHUDWLRQVௐDOUHDG\ௐLQௐWKHLUௐLQIDQWௐVWDJHVௐ WRGD\ௐ:HௐDUHௐFRPPLWWHGௐWRௐSLRQHHULQJௐRXUௐLQGXVWU\ௐIRUௐGHFDGHVௐWRௐFRPH 

 :KDWௐDUHௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\¶VௐH[SHFWDWLRQVௐLQௐWKHௐHYHQWௐRIௐ DQௐDZDUG"
,IௐDZDUGHGௐWKLVௐZRXOGௐEHௐRXUௐWKௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐDQGௐZHௐZRXOGௐH[HFXWHௐDVௐVXFKௐ:HௐZLOOௐ FRQWLQXHௐWRௐVHUYHௐ\RXUௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐSURYLGHௐWKHPௐZLWKௐH[FHOOHQWௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐZKLOHௐFRQWLQXLQJௐWRௐ DGYDQFHௐFXVWRPHUௐVDWLVIDFWLRQௐ$ORQJௐZLWKௐLPSOHPHQWLQJௐQHZௐEXVLQHVVௐJURZWKௐVWUDWHJLHVௐWKDWௐZLOOௐ XOWLPDWHO\ௐODXQFKௐXVௐLQWRௐQHZௐKHLJKWVௐRQFHௐDJDLQௐ
)XUWKHUPRUHௐZHௐZLOOௐODXQFKௐRXUௐ3DUWQHUௐ3URJUDPௐGHWDLOHGௐLQௐWKHௐDWWDFKHGௐ³PDUNHWLQJௐ3ODQௐ &RPSUHVVHG´ௐ=LSௐILOHௐ7KLVௐQH[WௐJHQHUDWLRQௐDSSOLFDWLRQௐZLOOௐJLYHௐPHPEHUVௐWKHௐSRZHUௐWRௐVHOHFWௐXSILWWHUVௐ WKH\ௐZRXOGௐOLNHௐ1$)*ௐWRௐSDUWQHUௐZLWKௐLQௐSURYLGLQJௐVDWLVIDFWRU\ௐTXRWHVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐ:HௐVHHௐWUHPHQGRXVௐ YDOXHௐLQௐEXLOGLQJௐRXWௐWKHVHௐPXWXDOO\ௐEHQHILFLDOௐSDUWQHUVKLSVௐVRௐZHௐFDQௐSURYLGHௐௐVDWLVIDFWRU\ௐ WXUQNH\ௐVROXWLRQVௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUV


 'HPRQVWUDWHௐ\RXUௐILQDQFLDOௐVWUHQJWKௐDQGௐVWDELOLW\ௐZLWKௐ PHDQLQJIXOௐGDWDௐ7KLVௐFRXOGௐLQFOXGHௐVXFKௐLWHPVௐDVௐ
ILQDQFLDOௐVWDWHPHQWVௐ6(&ௐILOLQJVௐFUHGLWௐDQGௐERQGௐ
UDWLQJVௐOHWWHUVௐRIௐFUHGLWௐDQGௐGHWDLOHGௐUHIHUHQFHௐOHWWHUVௐ 8SORDGௐVXSSRUWLQJௐGRFXPHQWVௐ
DVௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐ
GRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
7RௐGHPRQVWUDWHௐ1$)*¶VௐILQDQFLDOௐVWUHQJWKௐDQGௐVWDELOLW\ௐZHௐKDYHௐXSORDGHGௐ%DQNௐ&RPPLWPHQWௐOHWWHUVௐ XQGHUௐWKHௐ)LQDQFLDOௐ6WUHQJWKௐ6HFWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐRQOLQHௐDSSOLFDWLRQௐ:HௐKDYHௐDௐGLUHFWௐOLQHௐRIௐFUHGLWௐRIௐ ௐWKDWௐZHௐDUHௐFXUUHQWO\ௐXWLOL]LQJௐZLWKௐRXUௐFXUUHQWௐDQGௐSDVWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWVௐ+RZHYHUௐ WKLVௐQXPEHUௐLVௐQRWௐFDSSHGௐDVௐZHௐKDYHௐWKHௐIUHHGRPௐWRௐH[WHQGௐWKHௐFDSௐWRௐDFFRPPRGDWHௐWKHௐUHYROYLQJௐ QHHGVௐRIௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐ
5HIHUHQFHGௐEHORZௐLVௐDௐVKRUWௐUHJLVWHUௐRIௐVRPHௐRIௐRXUௐPDUNHWௐVXFFHVVௐIURPௐDZDUGHGௐJRYHUQPHQWௐ FRQWUDFWVௐWKDWௐHQFRPSDVVௐRYHUௐௐZRUWKௐRIௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐJRRGVௐXQGHUௐRXUௐFXUUHQWௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ
$ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ6DQௐ'LHJRௐ&$ௐௐௐFRQWUDFWௐXQGHUௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) %ௐௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ6DQௐ'LHJRௐ&$ௐௐௐFRQWUDFWௐXQGHUௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) &ௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ)OHHWௐ$UWLFOHௐ+LJKOLJKWLQJௐRXUௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐZLWKௐWKHௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ6DQௐ'LHJRௐ&$ௐSURFXULQJௐRYHUௐ ௐ3ROLFHௐYHKLFOHVௐWKURXJKௐ1$)*ௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) 'ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ:RUOGௐ$LUSRUWVௐ&$ௐ&RQWUDFWௐIRUௐௐௐXQGHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ 1$)ௐIRUௐWKHௐSURFXUHPHQWௐRIௐௐYHKLFOHV
(ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ+DUERUௐ&$ௐ&RQWUDFWௐ([WHQVLRQௐWRௐௐௐFRQWUDFWௐXQGHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ &RQWUDFWௐ1$)
)ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ+DUERUௐ&$ௐ&RQWUDFWௐIRUௐௐXQGHUௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) *ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ+DUERUௐ&$ௐ5HQHZDOௐIRUௐDQRWKHUௐௐௐXQGHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ&ODVVௐ ௐௐDQGௐௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$)
+ௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ&RVWDௐ0HVDௐ&$ௐ&RQWUDFWௐௐXQGHUௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) ,ௐ%ODQNHWௐ&RQWUDFWVௐZLWKௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ0DU\ODQGௐ0'ௐRIIௐRXUௐFXUUHQWௐ&ODVVௐௐௐDQGௐௐ&KDVVLVௐ&RQWUDFWௐ 1$)
-ௐ%ODQNHWௐ&RQWUDFWVௐZLWKௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ0DU\ODQGௐ0'ௐRIIௐRXUௐ&XUUHQWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$) :HௐKDYHௐDOVRௐDWWDFKHGௐRXUௐ&RPPLWPHQWௐ/HWWHU¶VௐIRUௐXQSDUDOOHOௐVXSSRUWௐIURPௐOHDGLQJௐQDWLRQDOO\ௐ UHFRJQL]HGௐXSILWௐVXSSOLHUVௐVXFKௐ7KHௐ.QDSKHLGHௐ0DQXIDFWXULQJௐ&RPSDQ\ௐ$ORQJௐZLWKௐUHJLRQDOௐVXSSOLHUVௐ VXFKௐDVௐ%UDQGௐ);ௐDQGௐ3KHQL[ௐ7UXFNௐ%RG\ௐORFDWHGௐLQௐ6RXWKHUQௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐVHUYHௐDVௐUHJLRQDOௐVXSSRUWௐ ORFDWLRQVௐZKRPௐZHௐRIWHQௐZRUNௐDORQJVLGHௐWRௐIXOILOOௐDOOௐPHPEHUௐQHHGVௐZLWKௐSDVWௐSUHVHQWௐDQGௐIXWXUHௐ RUGHUVௐZLWKௐ1$)*ௐ
,QFOXGHGௐDUHௐDOVRௐ8SILWWHUௐ5HFRPPHQGDWLRQௐOHWWHUVௐWRௐLOOXVWUDWHௐKRZௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐKDVௐ WDNHQௐDௐSURDFWLYHௐLQWHUHVWௐLQௐEXLOGLQJௐPXWXDOO\ௐEHQHILFLDOௐUHODWLRQVKLSௐZLWKௐRXUௐXSILWWHUVௐ0XWXDOLW\ௐDQGௐ UHFLSURFLW\ௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐEHWZHHQௐERG\ௐFRPSDQLHVௐDQGௐRXUௐGHDOHU¶VௐDUHௐWZRௐRIௐWKHௐNH\ௐFRPSRQHQWVௐ WKDWௐKHOSௐPHPEHUVௐUHFHLYHௐZKDWௐWKH\ௐQHHGௐLQௐDௐVPRRWKௐDQGௐHIILFLHQWௐIDVKLRQௐ ,QௐDGGLWLRQௐWKHௐDGRSWLRQௐRIௐRXUௐ&ODVVௐௐௐDQGௐௐ&RQWUDFWௐIURPௐ$QQHௐ$UXQGHOௐ&RXQW\ௐLQௐWKHௐVWDWHௐRIௐ 0DU\ODQGௐLVௐDVௐDQௐH[DPSOHௐRIௐKRZௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐDWWUDFWVௐDQGௐUHWDLQVௐQHZௐFOLHQWVௐE\ௐ GHPRQVWUDWLQJௐWRௐWKHPௐWKHUH¶VௐDௐEHWWHUௐDQGௐPRUHௐHIILFLHQWௐZD\ௐRIௐILQGLQJௐWXUQNH\ௐVROXWLRQV /DVWO\ௐZHௐKDYHௐDWWDFKHGௐVXSSRUWLQJௐGRFXPHQWVௐWKDWௐKHOSௐHPSKDVL]HௐDQGௐH[HPSOLI\ௐRXUௐJURZWKௐVLQFHௐ RXUௐILUVWௐDZDUGHGௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐLQௐௐ:HௐVLQFHUHO\ௐKRSHௐLWௐKHOSVௐSRUWUD\ௐRXUௐFRPPLWPHQWௐWRௐ EXLOGLQJௐOLIHORQJௐUDSSRUWௐDQGௐWUXVWௐZLWKௐRXUௐSDUWQHUௐXSILWWHUVௐDQGௐPHPEHUV 

 :KDWௐLVௐ\RXUௐ86ௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐIRUௐWKHௐVROXWLRQVௐWKDWௐ \RXௐDUHௐSURSRVLQJ"
ௐ2IௐRXUௐUHVSHFWLYHௐEUDQGVௐDQGௐ2(0¶VௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐWKHௐ86ௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐLVௐHVWLPDWHGௐWRௐEHௐௐ±ௐ  

 :KDWௐLVௐ\RXUௐ&DQDGLDQௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐIRUௐWKHௐVROXWLRQVௐ WKDWௐ\RXௐDUHௐSURSRVLQJ"
,WௐLVௐGLIILFXOWௐWRௐHVWLPDWHௐWKHௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐIRUௐWKHௐEUDQGVௐDQGௐ2(0¶VௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐKRZHYHUௐZHௐ HVWLPDWHௐWKDWௐLWௐVKRXOGௐEHௐWKHௐVDPHௐௐௐௐRIௐWKHௐ86ௐVKDUH 

 +DVௐ\RXUௐEXVLQHVVௐHYHUௐSHWLWLRQHGௐIRUௐEDQNUXSWF\ௐ
SURWHFWLRQ"ௐ,IௐVRௐH[SODLQௐLQௐGHWDLO
1R 

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
336
 +RZௐLVௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHG
ௐLVௐLWௐDௐ
PDQXIDFWXUHUௐDௐGLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐRUௐDௐVHUYLFHௐ SURYLGHU"ௐௐ$QVZHUௐZKLFKHYHUௐTXHVWLRQௐ
HLWKHUௐD
ௐRUௐE
ௐ
MXVWௐEHORZ
ௐEHVWௐDSSOLHVௐWRௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ
D
ௐௐௐௐ,Iௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLVௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHGௐDVௐDௐ
GLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐ
RUௐVLPLODUௐHQWLW\
ௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ
ZULWWHQௐDXWKRUL]DWLRQௐWRௐDFWௐDVௐDௐ
GLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐIRUௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐRIௐWKHௐ SURGXFWVௐSURSRVHGௐLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐLVௐ\RXUௐ
GHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐLQGHSHQGHQWௐRUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRZQHG"
E
ௐௐௐௐ,Iௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLVௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHGௐDVௐDௐ
PDQXIDFWXUHUௐRUௐVHUYLFHௐSURYLGHUௐGHVFULEHௐ\RXUௐ
UHODWLRQVKLSௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐIRUFHௐDQGௐZLWKௐ \RXUௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐLQௐGHOLYHULQJௐWKHௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐ
VHUYLFHVௐSURSRVHGௐLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ$UHௐWKHVHௐLQGLYLGXDOVௐ
\RXUௐHPSOR\HHVௐRUௐWKHௐHPSOR\HHVௐRIௐDௐWKLUGௐSDUW\"
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐLVௐDௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐEHVWௐFDWHJRUL]HGௐDVௐ³$´ௐௐ'LVWULEXWHU'HDOHU5HVHOOHUௐ DQGௐ'HDOHUௐ3DUWQHUௐIRUௐ

ௐ2(0ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐLQFOXGLQJௐ)RUGௐ0RWRUௐ&RPSDQ\ௐ&KHYUROHWௐ5$0ௐ *0&ௐ%XLFNௐ&KU\VOHUௐ'RGJHௐ-HHSௐ7R\RWDௐ1LVVDQௐ.,$ௐ%0:ௐ+RQGDௐ&DGLOODFௐDQGௐ9RONVZDJHQௐ$OOௐ RUGHUVௐDUHௐSODFHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐIUDQFKLVHGௐGHDOHUௐDQGௐXOWLPDWHO\ௐWLWOHGௐGLUHFWO\ௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐ$OOௐ DSSURSULDWHௐFHUWLILFDWLRQௐFHUWLILFDWHVௐDQGௐDXWKRUL]HGௐ'09)DFWRU\ௐOLFHQVHVௐPD\ௐEHௐIRXQGௐLQௐWKHௐ³5HODWHGௐ &HUWLILFDWLRQ´ௐVHFWLRQௐXSORDGHGௐWRௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ,WௐVKRXOGௐEHௐQRWHGௐZHௐGRௐQRWௐVHOOௐXVHGௐHTXLSPHQWௐWRௐ PHPEHUV


 ,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐSURYLGHௐDௐGHWDLOHGௐH[SODQDWLRQௐRXWOLQLQJௐ WKHௐOLFHQVHVௐDQGௐFHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐDUHௐERWKௐUHTXLUHGௐWRௐ EHௐKHOGௐDQGௐDFWXDOO\ௐKHOGௐE\ௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ

LQFOXGLQJௐWKLUGௐSDUWLHVௐDQGௐVXEFRQWUDFWRUVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐXVH ௐ
LQௐSXUVXLWௐRIௐWKHௐEXVLQHVVௐFRQWHPSODWHGௐE\ௐWKLVௐ5)3
5HTXLUHGௐOLFHQVHVௐLQFOXGHௐDௐ'HDOHU¶Vௐ/LFHQVHௐDௐ)UDQFKLVHௐLVVXHGௐE\ௐWKHௐ0DQXIDFWXUHௐDௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐ RIௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHVௐ/LFHQVHௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDௐ5HVHOOHU¶VௐSHUPLWௐOLFHQVHௐ$OOௐZKLFKௐ1$)*ௐDQGௐ'HDOHUௐ 3DUWQHU¶VௐKROGௐ3OHDVHௐUHYLHZௐRXUௐDWWDFKPHQWௐGRFXPHQWVௐLQௐVHFWLRQௐ³5HODWHGௐ&HUWLILFDWLRQ´ௐIRUௐOLFHQVHVௐ WKDWௐZHௐHLWKHUௐVROHO\ௐRZQௐRUௐDUHௐMRLQWO\ௐRZQHGௐE\ௐRXUௐSDUWQHUௐGHDOHUVௐWKDWௐSHUWDLQௐWRௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ$ௐOLVWௐRIௐ DOOௐRXUௐOLFHQVHVௐDUHௐEHORZௐVRPHௐRIௐZKLFKௐPD\ௐQRWௐSHUWDLQௐWRௐFODVVௐௐEXWௐWRௐFODVVௐௐ &$ௐ&HUWLILFDWHௐRIௐ*RRGௐ6WDQGLQJௐ

6WDWHௐRIௐ)ORULGDௐ/LFHQVHௐ&HUWLILFDWHV
ௐ
9)

9)

9)
9)

9)

9)
9)

9)

9)

9)
9)


&$ௐ6WDWHௐ6HOOHU¶Vௐ3HUPLWௐ

&$ௐ6WDWHௐ6HOOHU¶Vௐ3HUPLWௐ
'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ 
'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ 
'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ

%XUHDXௐRIௐ$XWRPRWLYHௐUHSDLUௐ5HJLVWUDWLRQௐௐ$5'

ௐ
&$ௐ6WDWHௐ6HOOHU¶Vௐ3HUPLWௐ

&LW\ௐRIௐ:DWVRQYLOOHௐ%XVLQHVVௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ

&LW\ௐRIௐ:DWVRQYLOOHௐ%XVLQHVVௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ
)LFWLWLRXVௐ%XVLQHVVௐ1DPHVௐIURPௐ6DQWDௐ&UX]ௐ&RXQW\ௐIRUௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐ)%1 ௐ
&DOLIRUQLDௐ*HQHUDOௐ5HVDOHௐ&HUWLILFDWHௐ
'XQௐ ௐ%UDGVWUHHWௐ1XPEHU
ௐ
*RYHUQPHQWௐRIௐ7KHௐ'LVWULFWௐRIௐ&ROXPELDௐ&HUWLILFDWH
*RYHUQPHQWௐRIௐWKHௐ'LVWULFWௐRIௐ&ROXPELDௐ7D[ௐ5HJLVWUDWLRQௐௐ &LW\ௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ7D[ௐ5HJLVWUDWLRQௐ
*RYHUQPHQWௐRIௐ7KHௐ'LVWULFWௐRIௐ&ROXPELDௐ&/($1ௐ+$1'6ௐ&(57,),&$7,21 6DQௐ'LHJRௐ)UHLJKWOLQHUௐ6HOOHU¶Vௐ3HUPLW
&RPPRQZHDOWKௐRIௐ9LUJLQLDௐ6WDWHௐ&RUSRUDWLRQௐ&RPPLVVLRQௐ&HUWLILFDWHௐ 6WDWHௐRIௐ0DU\ODQGௐ*RRGௐ6WDQGLQJௐ&HUWLILFDWHௐ
.DQVDVௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ5HYHQXHௐIRUௐ.DQVDVௐ&LW\ௐ3HWHUELOW
1HZௐ-HUVH\ௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ7UHDVXU\ௐ5HJLVWUDWLRQௐ&HUWLILFDWH 1HZௐ-HUVH\ௐ%XVLQHVVௐ5HJLVWUDWLRQௐ
1RWLFHௐRIௐ&RPSOLDQFHௐRIௐWKHௐ&DQWRQௐ&LW\ௐ&RGLILHGௐ2UGLQDQFHௐ (PSOR\HHௐ,QIRUPDWLRQௐ5HSRUWௐIRUௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ1HZௐ-HUVH\ௐ 6WDWHௐRIௐ0DU\ODQGௐ1HZௐ6DOHVௐDQGௐ8VHௐWD[ௐ/LFHQVHௐ
&$ௐ6WDWHௐ6HOOHU¶Vௐ3HUPLWௐ

ௐ
6RXWKௐ&DUROLQDௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHVௐ/LFHQVHௐ1XPEHUௐ 6WDWHௐRIௐ6RXWKௐ&DUROLQDௐ5HWDLOௐ/LFHQVHௐ
&RPPRQZHDOWKௐRIௐ.HQWXFN\ௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐௐௐ 6WDWHௐRIௐ:HVWௐ9LUJLQLDௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ
&RPPRQZHDOWKௐRIௐ.HQWXFN\ௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHௐௐௐ 6WDWHௐRIௐ7HQQHVVHHௐ9HKLFOHௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVH


 3URYLGHௐDOOௐ³6XVSHQVLRQௐRUௐ'HEDUPHQW´ௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐWKDWௐ KDVௐDSSOLHGௐWRௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐGXULQJௐWKHௐSDVWௐWHQௐ
\HDUV
1RWௐ$SSOLFDEOHௐQRQH


Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
337
7DEOH
,QGXVWU\5HFRJQLWLRQ 0DUNHWSODFH6XFFHVV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐUHOHYDQWௐLQGXVWU\ௐDZDUGVௐRUௐUHFRJQLWLRQௐ WKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐKDVௐUHFHLYHGௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐILYHௐ\HDUV
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXS¶VௐUHFHLYHGௐLWVௐPRVWௐSUHVWLJLRXVௐDZDUGௐIRUௐ7RSௐ3ODFHPHQWௐZLWKLQௐ)RUGௐ0RWRUௐ &RPSDQ\ௐDVௐWKHௐOHDGLQJௐGHDOHUVKLSௐLQௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ6DOHVௐ,QௐDGGLWLRQௐRXUௐ&KHYUROHWௐEUDQGௐZDVௐKLJKO\ௐ UDQNHGௐDQGௐKRQRUHGௐௐFRQVHFXWLYHௐ\HDUVௐE\ௐ*HQHUDOௐ0RWRUV 


:KDWௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDUHௐWRௐWKHௐ
JRYHUQPHQWDOௐVHFWRUௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV
:LWKLQௐRXUௐIOHHWௐGLYLVLRQௐ
ௐRIௐRXUௐFRQWUDFWVௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUVௐKDYHௐEHHQௐZLWKௐJRYHUQPHQWௐ DFFRXQWV 

 :KDWௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDUHௐWRௐWKHௐHGXFDWLRQௐ
VHFWRUௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV
:LWKLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐௐ\HDUVௐ
ௐRIௐRXUௐVDOHVௐKDYHௐEHHQௐWRௐJRYHUQPHQWௐDFFRXQWVௐௐRIௐZKLFKௐDUHௐ ZLWKLQௐWKHௐHGXFDWLRQௐVHFWRU 

 /LVWௐDQ\ௐVWDWHௐSURYLQFLDOௐRUௐFRRSHUDWLYHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐ FRQWUDFWVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐKROGௐ:KDWௐLVௐWKHௐDQQXDOௐVDOHVௐ
YROXPHௐIRUௐHDFKௐRIௐWKHVHௐFRQWUDFWVௐRYHUௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ \HDUV"
:HௐKROGௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐFRQWUDFWௐZLWKௐYROXPHVௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐXQLWVௐDௐ\HDUௐRYHUௐWKHௐSDVWௐ WKUHHௐ\HDUVௐ,QௐDGGLWLRQௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFW¶Vௐ

ௐௐDQGௐௐWKDWௐZHௐKDYHௐ
PDLQWDLQHGௐRYHUௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUVௐKDVௐVROGௐFRPELQHGௐQRUWKௐRIௐௐPLOOLRQௐRIௐ&RPELQHGௐ4XDUWHUO\ௐ 6DOHV


 /LVWௐDQ\ௐ*6$ௐFRQWUDFWVௐRUௐ6WDQGLQJௐ2IIHUVௐDQGௐ6XSSO\ௐ $UUDQJHPHQWVௐ
626$
ௐWKDWௐ\RXௐKROGௐ:KDWௐLVௐWKHௐ
DQQXDOௐVDOHVௐYROXPHௐIRUௐHDFKௐRIௐWKHVHௐFRQWUDFWVௐRYHUௐ
WKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV"
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXS¶VௐIRFXVௐOLHVௐRQௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ1$)*ௐKROGVௐQRௐRWKHUௐ*6$ௐ FRQWUDFWௐ6WDQGLQJௐ2IIHUVௐRUௐ6XSSO\ௐ$UUDQJHPHQWVௐRWKHUௐWKDQௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐFRQWUDFWௐௐ2XUௐ DQQXDOௐVDOHVௐYROXPHௐLVௐHVWLPDWHGௐWRௐEHௐQRUWKௐRIௐௐPLOOLRQ 

7DEOH
5HIHUHQFHV7HVWLPRQLDOV
/LQH,WHP6XSSO\UHIHUHQFHLQIRUPDWLRQIURPWKUHHFXVWRPHUVZKRDUHHOLJLEOHWREH6RXUFHZHOOSDUWLFLSDWLQJHQWLWLHV (QWLW\1DPH
&RQWDFW1DPH
3KRQH1XPEHU

3RUWௐRIௐ/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ&$ 0Uௐ'DYHௐ&RPHU 
 

&RXQW\ௐRIௐ9HQWXUHௐ&$ 0Uௐ-RUJHௐ%QLOOD  

&LW\ௐRIௐ$XVWLQௐ7; 0Uௐ0DWWௐ6DJHU 
 

&RXQW\ௐRIௐ6DQௐ-RDTXLQௐ&$ 0Uௐ'DYLGௐ0\HUV 


&LW\ௐRIௐ3DORௐ$OWRௐ&$ 0Vௐ'DQLWUDௐ%DKOPDQ 


7DEOH
7RS)LYH*RYHUQPHQWRU(GXFDWLRQ&XVWRPHUV
/LQH,WHP3URYLGHDOLVWRI\RXUWRSILYHJRYHUQPHQWHGXFDWLRQRUQRQSURILWFXVWRPHUV HQWLW\QDPHLVRSWLRQDO
LQFOXGLQJHQWLW\W\SHWKHVWDWHRUSURYLQFHWKH
HQWLW\LVORFDWHGLQVFRSHRIWKHSURMHFW
V
VL]HRIWUDQVDFWLRQ
V
DQGGROODUYROXPHVIURPWKHSDVWWKUHH\HDUV
(QWLW\1DPH (QWLW\7\SH
6WDWH3URYLQFH
6FRSHRI:RUN
6L]HRI7UDQVDFWLRQV
'ROODU9ROXPH3DVW7KUHH
<HDUV

&LW\ௐRIௐ$XVWLQ *RYHUQPHQW 7H[DV7; 3XUFKDVHU ௐ9HKLFOHVௐDWௐRQFHௐ9DQVௐ DQGௐ689V
2YHUௐ0 

/RVௐ$QJHOHVௐ
'HSDUWPHQWௐRIௐ
:DWHUௐDQGௐ3RZHU
*RYHUQPHQW &DOLIRUQLD&$ 3XUFKDVHU 2YHUௐௐ9HKLFOHVௐ9DQVௐDQGௐ 689V
2YHUௐ0


3RUWௐRIௐ/RVௐ
$QJHOHV
*RYHUQPHQW &DOLIRUQLD&$ 3XUFKDVHU 2YHUௐௐ7UXFNVௐ9DQVௐDQGௐ689V 2YHUௐ0 

$QQHௐ$UXQGHOௐ
&RXQW\
*RYHUQPHQW 0DU\ODQG0' 3XUFKDVHU 2YHUௐௐ7UXFNVௐ9DQVௐDQGௐ689V 2YHUௐ0 

&LW\ௐRIௐ6DQௐ'LHJR *RYHUQPHQW &DOLIRUQLD&$ 3XUFKDVHU 2YHUௐௐ7UXFNVௐ9DQVௐ689 2YHUௐ0 

7DEOH
$ELOLW\WR6HOODQG'HOLYHU6HUYLFH
'HVFULEH\RXUFRPSDQ\¶VFDSDELOLW\WRPHHWWKHQHHGVRI6RXUFHZHOOSDUWLFLSDWLQJHQWLWLHVDFURVVWKH86DQG&DQDGDDVDSSOLFDEOH<RXUUHVSRQVHVKRXOGDGGUHVV LQGHWDLODWOHDVWWKHIROORZLQJDUHDV
ORFDWLRQVRI\RXUQHWZRUNRIVDOHVDQGVHUYLFHSURYLGHUVWKHQXPEHURIZRUNHUV IXOOWLPHHTXLYDOHQWV
LQYROYHGLQHDFKVHFWRU
ZKHWKHUWKHVHZRUNHUVDUH\RXUGLUHFWHPSOR\HHV
RUHPSOR\HHVRIDWKLUGSDUW\
DQGDQ\RYHUODSEHWZHHQWKHVDOHVDQGVHUYLFHIXQFWLRQV /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 6DOHVௐIRUFH 2XUௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐFRQVLVWVௐRIௐGLUHFWௐDQGௐDQௐLQGLUHFWௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐ2XUௐGLUHFWௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐFRQVLVWVௐRIௐGLUHFWௐ HPSOR\HHVௐDQGௐSDUWQHUௐGHDOHUVௐZKLFKௐH[FHHGVௐDQௐHPSOR\HHௐFRXQWௐRIௐௐSHUVRQQHOௐERWKௐIXOOௐWLPHௐDQGௐ SDUWௐWLPHௐ0DQ\ௐRIௐRXUௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐDUHௐVSUHDGௐDFURVVௐWKHௐ86ௐDQGௐZHௐOHYHUDJHௐRXUௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐZLWKௐ RXUௐODUJHUௐFODVVௐGHDOHUVKLSVௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐORZHUௐFODVVௐYHKLFOHௐQHHGVௐDVௐZHOOௐ$ௐFURVVௐVDOHVௐ IRUFHௐ7KHVHௐLQGLYLGXDOVௐKHOSௐVXSSRUWௐRXUௐGHDOHUVKLSVௐDQGௐ1$)*ௐ)OHHWௐ'LYLVLRQௐGLUHFWO\ௐ2QௐWKHௐRWKHUௐ KDQGௐRXUௐLQGLUHFWௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐPDGHௐXSௐRIௐXSILWWHUVௐDQGௐSDUWQHUௐVXSSOLHUVௐFRQVLVWVௐRIௐRYHUௐௐSHUVRQQHOௐ ZLWKௐRXUௐSDUWQHUௐQHWZRUNௐDQGௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐJURZLQJௐDQQXDOO\ௐ :LWKௐERWKௐGLUHFWௐDQGௐLQGLUHFWௐVDOHVௐIRUFHௐVWDIIௐZRUNLQJௐWRJHWKHUௐ1$)*ௐKDVௐEHHQௐDEOHௐWRௐVXFFHVVIXOO\ௐ JURZௐPDLQWDLQௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐWKHௐGHPDQGௐRIௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐ$VௐWKHௐQXPEHUௐRIௐ\RXUௐPHPEHUVௐJURZௐZHௐZLOOௐ FRQWLQXRXVO\ௐZHOFRPHௐPRUHௐVWDIIௐWRௐQRWௐRQO\ௐPHHWௐFXVWRPHUௐGHPDQGௐEXWௐDOVRௐWRௐH[FHHGௐFXVWRPHUௐ H[SHFWDWLRQV


Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
338
 'HDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐRUௐRWKHUௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐPHWKRGV 2XUௐIUDQFKLVHௐQHWZRUNௐLQௐ&DQDGDௐDQGௐWKHௐ86ௐLVௐIRUWXQDWHO\ௐVHFRQGௐWRௐQRQHௐ2XUௐௐSURSRVHGௐ2(06ௐ SUHYLRXVO\ௐPHQWLRQHGௐDOOௐRIௐZKLFKௐKDYHௐHVWDEOLVKHGௐDௐSUHVHQFHௐQDWLRQZLGHௐZLWKௐIDFWRU\ௐVWRUHVௐ VWUDWHJLFDOO\ௐSODFHGௐZKHUHௐDOOௐPHPEHUVௐFDQௐUHFHLYHௐVHUYLFHௐDQGௐFRPSOHWHௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUVௐZLWKௐWKHLUௐ UHVSHFWLYHௐSURGXFWV
ௐ6LPSOHௐSXWௐWKHௐ1RUWKௐ$PHULFDQௐDQGௐ&DQDGLDQௐDXWRPRELOHௐVXSSO\ௐFKDLQௐQHWZRUNௐLVௐRQHௐRIௐWKHௐEHVWௐLQௐ WKHௐZRUOGௐ2IௐWKHௐௐEUDQGVௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐWKHௐ2(0VௐKDYHௐSXWௐLQௐSODFHௐDௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐDFURVVௐDOOௐௐ VWDWHVௐWKDWௐZLOOௐDOORZௐXVௐWRௐEHVWௐVHUYHௐDOOௐPHPEHUV


 6HUYLFHௐIRUFH 7KHௐௐPDQXIDFWXUHVௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐKDYHௐWKRXVDQGVௐRIௐVHUYLFHௐORFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐEHௐHDVLO\ௐDFFHVVLEOHௐ WRௐDOOௐ\RXUௐPHPEHUVௐ6HUYLFHௐFHQWHUVௐDQGௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUௐIDFLOLWLHVௐIRUௐDOOௐௐ2(0VௐDUHௐDPSOHௐDQGௐ UHDG\ௐWRௐKHOSௐVHUYLFHௐRXUௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐWKHLUௐQHHGVௐ+RZHYHUௐ$ODVNDௐDQGௐ+DZDLLௐPD\ௐEHௐH[FHSWLRQVௐ DVௐWKH\ௐPD\ௐKDYHௐIDUWKHUௐGLVWDQFHVௐEHWZHHQௐIUDQFKLVHVௐZKHUHௐPHPEHUVௐFDQௐXWLOL]HௐWKHௐUHSDLUௐVHUYLFHV 

 'HVFULEHௐWKHௐRUGHULQJௐSURFHVVௐ,IௐRUGHUVௐZLOOௐEHௐ
KDQGOHGௐE\ௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐGHDOHUVௐRUௐRWKHUVௐH[SODLQௐWKHௐ UHVSHFWLYHௐUROHVௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐDQGௐRWKHUV
7KHௐPHPEHUௐPD\ௐRUGHUௐWKHLUௐYHKLFOHVௐE\ௐQDYLJDWLQJௐWRௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐZZZ1DWLRQDO$XWR)OHHW*URXSFRPௐ DQGௐJRLQJௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐVWHSE\VWHSௐSURFHVVௐWRௐJHQHUDWHௐDQௐRQOLQHௐTXRWHௐRUௐE\ௐFDOOLQJௐRQHௐRIௐRXUௐ UHSUHVHQWDWLYHVௐDWௐ
ௐRUௐE\ௐVHQGLQJௐ1$)*ௐDQௐHPDLOௐDWௐ)OHHW#1DWLRQDO$XWR)OHHW*URXSFRPௐ 2UGHUVௐDUHௐWKHQௐSURFHVVHGௐGLUHFWO\ௐWRௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐZKRௐZLOOௐZRUNௐWRௐVXSSO\ௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐWRௐWKHௐVKLS WRௐORFDWLRQௐIRUௐXSILWWLQLJௐRUௐHQGௐXVHUௐGHVLUHGௐGHOLYHU\ௐORFDWLRQ 


'HVFULEHௐLQௐGHWDLOௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐDQGௐSURFHGXUHௐRIௐ
\RXUௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐSURJUDPௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOHௐௐ
,QFOXGHௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHWLPHௐFDSDELOLWLHVௐDQGௐ
FRPPLWPHQWVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDQ\ௐLQFHQWLYHVௐWKDWௐKHOSௐ
\RXUௐSURYLGHUVௐPHHWௐ\RXUௐVWDWHGௐVHUYLFHௐJRDOVௐRUௐ
SURPLVHV
7RௐEHVWௐGHPRQVWUDWHௐRXUௐ&XVWRPHUௐ6HUYLFHௐSURJUDPௐNLQGO\ௐUHIHUHQFHௐWKHௐ=,3ௐILOHௐ³0HPEHUௐ:DONௐ 7KURXJK´ௐWKDWௐLVௐDWWDFKHGௐLQௐWKHௐ$GGLWLRQDOௐ'RFXPHQWVௐIROGHUௐ3OHDVHௐEHJLQௐZLWKௐDQGௐUHYLHZௐLQௐRUGHUௐWKDWௐ LVௐH[SODLQHGௐEHORZ
ௐ
+RZௐ0HPEHUVௐ&DQௐ*HWௐ4XRWHVௐ2QOLQH
ௐௐ$ௐPHPEHUௐFDQௐREWDLQௐPRVWௐTXRWHVௐE\ௐYLVLWLQJௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐ ZZZ1DWLRQDO$XWR)OHHW*URXSFRPௐZKHUHௐDௐVLPSOHௐRQHௐVWHSௐIRUPௐLVௐQHHGHGௐIRUௐUHJLVWUDWLRQௐ7KLVௐLVௐWRௐ SURWHFWௐWKHௐSULFHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐIURPௐQRQPHPEHUVௐ2QFHௐDௐPHPEHUௐUHJLVWHUVௐWKH\ௐZLOOௐUHFHLYHௐDQௐ DXWRPDWHGௐZHOFRPHௐHPDLOௐZLWKௐDௐGHPRௐYLGHRௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐXVHௐRXUௐVLWHௐ0HPEHUVௐZLOOௐJDLQௐDFFHVVௐWRௐ WKHUHௐYHU\ௐRZQௐGDVKERDUGௐZKLFKௐZLOOௐKRXVHௐDOOௐWKHUHௐTXRWHVௐLQௐRQHௐVDIHௐVHFXUHௐORJLQௐ0HPEHU¶VௐFDQௐ VHOHFWௐZKLFKௐEUDQGௐWKH\ௐDUHௐORRNLQJௐIRUௐDQGௐPRGHOௐ\HDUௐ2XUௐVLWHௐVKRZVௐDOOௐWKHௐFDWHJRULHVௐWKHௐEUDQGௐ RIIHUVௐVXFKௐDV
ௐ&DUVௐ9DQVௐ689¶Vௐ7UXFNVௐDQGௐ&KDVVLVௐ&DEVௐ0HPEHUVௐZLOOௐWKHQௐEHௐDEOHௐWRௐGULOOௐGRZQௐ IRUௐWKHௐULJKWௐVHOHFWLRQௐE\ௐSLFNLQJௐIURPௐWKHௐILOWHUௐPHQXௐRIௐZKDWௐFDEௐWKHUHௐORRNLQJௐIRUௐ 5HJXODUௐ([WHQGHGௐ
RUௐ&UHZ
ௐWRௐௐZKHHOௐRUௐௐZKHHOௐGULYHௐGRZQௐWRௐWKHௐEHGௐOHQJWKௐWKHUHௐORRNLQJௐIRUௐௐ$OOௐIDFWRU\ௐRSWLRQVௐDUHௐ WKHQௐSUHVHQWHGௐIRUௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐWRௐVHOHFWௐIURPௐWKLVௐZLOOௐVKRZௐDOOௐFXUUHQWௐIDFWRU\ௐRUGHUDEOHௐRSWLRQVௐWDNLQJௐ WKHௐJXHVVௐZRUNௐRXWௐIRUௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐ2QFHௐDௐPHPEHUௐVHOHFWVௐDௐGHVLUHௐEXLOGௐWKH\ௐZLOOௐVHHௐWKHUHௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐ3ULFHௐUHSRUWௐVKRZLQJௐWKHௐ0653ௐWKHUHௐFRQWUDFWௐSULFHௐWKHௐVDYLQJௐLQௐUHDOௐGROODUVௐDQGௐDVௐDௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐ,QௐWKHௐ3')ௐH[DPSOHௐ\RXௐFDQௐVHHௐDௐVDYLQJௐRIௐௐ 
ௐRIௐௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐ
VKRZLQJௐDௐVLJQLILFDQWௐVDYLQJVௐ0HPEHUVௐWKHQௐFDQௐFKRVHௐWRௐDGGௐH[WUD¶VௐWRௐWKHUHௐRUGHUௐOLNHௐH[WUDௐNH\V¶ௐ VHUYLFHௐPDQXDOVௐVDOHVௐWD[ௐDQGௐHYHQௐUHTXHVWௐDQௐXSILWௐWRௐEHௐDGGHGௐWRௐWKHUHௐTXRWHௐ/DVWO\ௐWKH\ௐZLOOௐEHௐ JLYHQௐDௐFRPSOHWHௐWXUQௐNH\ௐTXRWHௐSDFNDJHௐWRௐSULQWௐZKLFKௐZLOOௐLQFOXGHௐWKHUHௐFXVWRPL]HGௐ4XRWHௐ,'ௐ 'HVFULSWLRQௐDQGௐ6SHFLILFDWLRQVௐRIௐZKDWௐWKH\ௐEXLOWௐௐௐ
+RZௐ0HPEHUVௐDQGௐ8SILWWHUVௐFDQௐ3DUWQHUௐZLWKௐ1$)*
ௐ2XUௐGHGLFDWHGௐZHEVLWHௐZZZ1$)*3DUWQHUFRPௐZDVௐ
EXLOWௐWRௐDFFRPPRGDWHௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐZKRௐZRXOGௐOLNHௐDௐFHUWDLQௐXSILWWHUௐWRௐXSILWௐWKHUHௐYHKLFOHVௐ,WௐZDVௐDOVRௐ EXLOWௐIRUௐXSILWWHUVௐWRௐKDYHௐDௐSODFHௐWRௐJRௐZKHUHௐWKH\ௐFDQௐILQGௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐSDUWQHUௐZLWKௐ1$)*ௐ WRௐEHWWHUௐVHUYHௐWKHUHௐORFDOௐPHPEHUVௐ
([DPSOHௐRIௐ$ௐ0HPEHUௐZLWKௐ8SILWௐ4XRWH
ௐ7KLVௐLVௐDQௐH[DPSOHௐRIௐKRZௐZHௐXVHௐRXUௐ&DEௐ&KDVVLVௐDQGௐ
FRPELQHௐWKHPௐZLWKௐDQௐXSILWௐWRௐSURYLGHௐDௐWXUQNH\ௐVROXWLRQௐIRUௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐLQௐDௐVLPSOHௐWRௐIROORZௐIRUPDWௐ (7$ௐ6\VWHPௐIRUௐ0HPEHUVௐ:DONௐ7KURXJK
ௐ7KLVௐLVௐZKHUHௐPHPEHUVௐFDQௐHDVLO\ௐFRPHௐWRௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐWKHௐ VDPHௐZHEVLWHௐWKH\ௐEXLOWௐWKHUHௐFKDVVLVௐRQௐDQGௐWUDFNௐWKHUHௐRUGHUௐOLNHௐWKH\ௐZRXOGௐDௐ836ௐSDFNDJHௐ:Hௐ KDYHௐDௐYHU\ௐVLPSOHௐGLVSOD\ௐRQௐRXUௐKRPHSDJHௐ³7UDFNௐ\RXUௐRUGHU´ௐZKHUHௐPHPEHUVௐFDQௐHQWHUௐRQHௐRIௐWKHௐ

IROORZLQJ
ௐ3XUFKDVHௐ2UGHUௐ1XPEHUௐ4XRWHௐ,'ௐ8SILWௐ4XRWHௐ,'ௐRUௐYLQௐWRௐHDVLO\ௐVHHௐWKHUHௐLQௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐ WKHUHௐSDUWLFXODUௐRUGHUௐLVௐLQௐ
&RXUWHV\ௐ&RQILUPDWLRQௐ([SODLQHG
ௐ$IWHUௐ1$)*ௐUHFHLYHVௐDQௐRUGHUௐIURPௐDௐ0HPEHUௐZHௐDOZD\VௐOLNHௐWRௐ VHQGௐWKHPௐDௐ&RXUWHV\ௐ&RQILUPDWLRQௐ7KLVௐLVௐZHUHௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐZLOOௐGRXEOHௐFKHFNௐVRPHௐSDUWLFXODUVௐRQௐ WKHUHௐRUGHUௐOLNHௐ&RORUௐ4XDQWLW\ௐ8SILWௐDQGௐ6SHFLILFDWLRQ¶VௐDUHௐDOOௐFRUUHFWௐEHIRUHௐRUGHUௐSODFHPHQWௐௐ:Hௐ DOVRௐOLNHௐWRௐDVNௐIRUௐWLWOHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDWௐWKLVௐSRLQWௐVRௐZHௐFDQௐKHOSௐSURFHVVௐWKHௐSDSHUZRUNௐDWௐGHOLYHU\ௐ SURPSWO\
ௐௐ)DFWRU\ௐ2UGHUௐ&XWௐ2IIௐ1RWLFHV
ௐ+HUHௐLVௐZHUHௐZHௐOLNHௐWRௐKLJKOLJKWௐZHUHௐPHPEHUVௐFDQௐDFFHVVௐDQ\ௐ XSFRPLQJௐIDFWRU\ௐRUGHUௐFXWௐRIIௐGDWHVௐ:HௐZDONௐWKHPௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐVWHSௐE\ௐVWHSௐWRௐHQVXUHௐ HYHU\RQHௐNQRZVௐWKHௐXSFRPLQJௐRUGHUௐFXWௐRIIௐGDWHௐZHௐHYHQௐSULQWௐWKLVௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐ LIௐNQRZQௐDWௐWKHௐWLPH
ௐ
ULJKWௐRQௐWKHௐFRYHUௐSDJHௐRIௐWKHUHௐTXRWHVௐ
9DOLGDWLRQௐ:DONௐ7KURXJKௐ([DPSOH
ௐ7RௐGHPRQVWUDWHௐDௐSULFHௐYDOLGDWLRQௐZHௐVKRZௐZKDWௐDௐPHPEHUௐZRXOGௐ VHHௐZKHQௐWKH\ௐEXLOGௐDௐWUXFNௐRQௐRXUௐVLWHௐ$WௐFKHFNௐRXWௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐZRXOGௐVHHௐWKHௐ7RWDOௐ&RQILJXUHGௐ 0653ௐRIௐௐௐ$ௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ3ULFHௐRIௐௐௐ7RWDOௐ6DYLQJௐRIௐௐ ௐRUௐௐIRUௐ
Dௐௐ)ௐIROORZHGௐE\ௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐSDJHௐZKLFKௐVKRZVௐWKHௐ0LQLPXPௐ'LVFRXQWௐRIௐDWௐOHDVWௐௐ$Vௐ \RXௐVHHௐZHௐSURYLGHGௐDQௐDGGLWLRQDOௐௐGLVFRXQWௐRQௐWRSௐRIௐWKHௐௐFRQWUDFWௐGLVFRXQWௐ7KLVௐZRXOGௐEHௐ WKHௐFDVHௐLQௐPRVWௐLQVWDQFHV


 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐDQGௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHV
2XUௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐDQGௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐPHPEHUVௐQDWLRQZLGHௐLVௐXQSDUDOOHOHGௐ:HௐKDYHௐGHGLFDWHGௐVWDIIௐௐ GD\VௐDௐZHHNௐIURPௐDPௐWRௐSPௐVWDQGLQJௐE\ௐUHDG\ௐWRௐDVVLVWௐDQ\ௐPHPEHUௐKHOSௐILQGௐWKHௐEHVWௐVROXWLRQௐIRUௐ WKHUHௐQHHGVௐHYHQௐLIௐKHOSLQJௐDVVLVWௐWKHPௐWRௐWKHௐEHVWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐWKDWௐFRXOGௐEHௐDௐVROXWLRQௐ:Hௐ KDYHௐDௐGHGLFDWHGௐOLYHௐFKDWௐIHDWXUHௐRQௐRXUௐRQOLQHௐTXRWHௐJHQHUDWLQJௐZHEVLWHௐLQௐFDVHௐDQ\ௐPHPEHUௐKDVௐ DQ\ௐWURXEOHௐDWௐDOOௐLQௐEXLOGLQJௐWKHUHௐTXRWHVௐ1$)*ௐKDVௐHVWDEOLVKHGௐDௐFKDLQௐRIௐVXSSOLHUVௐZKRௐDUHௐDWௐWKHௐ UHDG\ௐWRௐVHUYHௐLIௐFDOOHGௐXSRQௐE\ௐDQ\ௐPHPEHUௐ:HௐDUHௐKHUHௐWRௐKHOS 

 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐDQGௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐ&DQDGD
:HௐDUHௐZLOOLQJௐDQGௐHDJHUௐWRௐVRRQௐH[WHQGௐRXUௐEXVLQHVVௐPRGHOௐDQGௐQHWZRUNௐLQWRௐ&DQDGDௐ:HௐEHOLHYHௐ SDUWQHULQJௐZLWKௐORFDOௐ&DQDGLDQௐEDVHGௐGHDOHUௐJURXSVௐLVௐNH\ௐWRௐVXFFHVVௐLQௐWKHௐ&DQDGLDQௐPDUNHWௐ1$)*¶Vௐ FRPSHWLWLYHௐSULFLQJௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDௐVLPSOHௐ86ௐ'ROODUௐWRௐ&DQDGLDQௐFRQYHUVDWLRQௐZLOOௐKHOSௐ1$)*ௐH[SDQGௐ LQWRௐWKHௐ&DQDGLDQௐPDUNHWௐIRUௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐPHPEHUV 

 ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐJHRJUDSKLFௐDUHDVௐRIௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐ
RUௐ&DQDGDௐWKDWௐ\RXௐZLOOௐ127ௐEHௐIXOO\ௐVHUYLQJௐWKURXJKௐ
WKHௐSURSRVHGௐFRQWUDFW
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐZLOOௐKDQGOHௐVHUYLFLQJௐௐRIௐDOOௐJHRJUDSKLFௐDUHDVௐORFDWHGௐLQௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ 6WDWHVௐௐ$OWKRXJKௐLWௐLVௐXQFOHDUௐZKDWௐXQVHHQௐREVWDFOHVௐZHௐPD\ௐIDFHௐLQௐ&DQDGDௐ1$)*ௐLVௐFRPPLWWHGௐWRௐ EXLOGLQJௐWKHௐVDPHௐPRGHOௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐ&DQDGDௐDQGௐSURYLGLQJௐWKHௐVDPHௐOHYHOௐRIௐFXVWRPHUௐVDWLVIDFWLRQௐ VHUYLFHௐDQGௐFDUHௐDVௐLQௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHV


Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
339
 ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLW\ௐVHFWRUVௐ

LHௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHGXFDWLRQௐQRWIRUSURILW
ௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ
ZLOOௐ127ௐEHௐIXOO\ௐVHUYLQJௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐSURSRVHGௐ
FRQWUDFWௐ([SODLQௐLQௐGHWDLOௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐGRHVௐ\RXUௐ
FRPSDQ\ௐKDYHௐRQO\ௐDௐUHJLRQDOௐSUHVHQFHௐRUௐGRௐRWKHUௐ
FRRSHUDWLYHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐFRQWUDFWVௐOLPLWௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐ SURPRWHௐDQRWKHUௐFRQWUDFW"
1$)*ௐZLOOௐFRQWLQXHௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐDOOௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ0HPEHUVௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐௐKRXUௐDௐGD\ௐௐGD\VௐDௐZHHNௐ RQOLQHௐSRUWDOௐZLWKௐWKHௐH[FOXVLRQௐRIௐ1RQ3URILWVௐ8QIRUWXQDWHO\ௐ1RQ3URILWVௐDUHௐRIWHQௐQRWௐHOLJLEOHௐIRUௐWKHௐ VDPHௐGLVFRXQW¶VௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐDUHௐTXDOLILHGௐIRUௐ+RZHYHUௐ1RQ3URILWVௐDUHௐVXEMHFWௐWRௐDௐGLIIHUHQWௐ SULFLQJௐSURJUDPௐDQGௐZLOOௐEHௐHYDOXDWHGௐRQௐDௐFDVHௐWRௐFDVHௐEDVLV 

 'HILQHௐDQ\ௐVSHFLILFௐFRQWUDFWௐUHTXLUHPHQWVௐRUௐ
UHVWULFWLRQVௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐDSSO\ௐWRௐRXUௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐ+DZDLLௐDQGௐ$ODVNDௐDQGௐLQௐ86ௐ7HUULWRULHV
7KHௐRQO\ௐSRVVLEOHௐORJLVWLFDOௐFRQVWUDLQWVௐZHௐPD\ௐIDFHௐLVௐWKHௐVKLSSLQJௐFRQVWUDLQWVௐIRUௐVKLSPHQWVௐDUULYLQJௐLQௐ $ODVNDௐ+DZDLLௐDQGௐ86ௐ7HUULWRULHVௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐZHௐRIWHQௐSURYLGHௐPHPEHUVௐLQௐ$ODVNDௐRUௐ+DZDLLௐZLWKௐ YHKLFOHVௐWKDWௐRIWHQௐKDYHௐXSILWVௐ7RௐFLUFXPYHQWௐWKLVௐSRWHQWLDOௐLVVXHௐPHPEHUVௐDOORZௐXVௐWRௐDGGௐWKHVHௐH[WUDௐ VKLSSLQJௐDQGௐSRUWௐFRVWVௐWRௐWKHLUௐTXRWHV


7DEOH
0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJ\ௐIRUௐSURPRWLQJௐ
WKLVௐFRQWUDFWௐRSSRUWXQLW\ௐௐ8SORDGௐ
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐVDPSOHVௐRIௐ\RXUௐPDUNHWLQJௐ
PDWHULDOVௐ
LIௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐ
XSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐHQFRPSDVVHVௐDௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJLHVௐWRௐSURPRWHௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐ VHUYLFHVௐWRௐVWUHDPOLQHௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐSURFHVVௐIRUௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐௐௐ%HORZௐDUHௐDௐIHZௐVWUDWHJLHVௐ XVHGௐWRௐVHUYHௐDVௐWKHௐJDWHZD\ௐEHWZHHQௐRXUௐEXVLQHVVௐDQGௐSXEOLFௐDJHQFLHVௐௐ :HEVLWHௐDQGௐ,QERXQGௐ0DUNHWLQJ
ௐௐ7KHௐFUHDWLRQௐRIௐDௐSURIHVVLRQDOௐFXVWRPHUIRFXVHGௐZHEVLWHௐLVௐRQHௐRIௐRXUௐPDLQௐ IHDWXUHVௐWRௐPDUNHWௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐ7KHௐ1$)*ௐZHEVLWHௐHQFRXUDJHVௐRXUௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐLQWHUDFWௐDQGௐ EURZVHௐWKURXJKௐSURGXFWVௐRIIHUHGௐDORQJௐZLWKௐSULFLQJௐDQGௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDERXWௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐ,QERXQGௐ PDUNHWLQJௐLVௐFUHDWHGௐZKHQௐSRWHQWLDOௐPHPEHUVௐDUHௐGLUHFWHGௐWRௐWKHௐFRPSDQ\ௐZHEVLWHௐௐ:LWKௐWKLVௐPHWKRGௐZHௐ DUHௐDEOHௐWRௐQRWௐRQO\ௐFRQQHFWௐZLWKௐPHPEHUVௐEXWௐWRௐSXWௐWKHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐDELOLW\ௐLQWRௐWKHௐKDQGVௐRIௐHDFKௐPHPEHUௐௐ 2XUௐLQERXQGௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJ\ௐDWWUDFWVௐPHPEHUVௐE\ௐFUHDWLQJௐYDOXDEOHௐFRQWHQWௐDQGௐH[SHULHQFHVௐWDLORUHGௐWRௐWKHௐ QHHGVௐRIௐHDFKௐLQGLYLGXDOௐ([DPSOHVௐLQFOXGHௐHPDLOௐFDPSDLJQௐIO\HUVௐRQௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐLQIRUPDWLYHௐDQGௐKRZWRௐ YLGHRVௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐDQGௐHQJDJLQJௐPHPEHUVௐZLWKௐWRSQRWFKHGௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐWRௐEXLOGௐEUDQGௐDZDUHQHVVௐ (PDLOௐ0DUNHWLQJ
ௐ2QHௐRIௐWKHௐPDLQௐVWUDWHJLHVௐXVHGௐWRௐHQJDJHௐFXUUHQWௐDQGௐSRWHQWLDOௐPHPEHUVௐLVௐ(PDLOௐ 0DUNHWLQJௐ2XUௐHPDLOVௐLQFOXGHௐGLIIHUHQWௐW\SHVௐRIௐIO\HUVௐWKDWௐFRQVLVWௐRIௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐ SURPRWLQJௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐEUDQGVௐKROLGD\ௐWKHPHGௐIO\HUVௐGLVFRXQWVௐRIIHUHGௐWRௐILUVWௐWLPHௐEX\HUVௐLPSRUWDQWௐFXWRIIௐ GDWHௐUHPLQGHUVௐDQGௐXSFRPLQJௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐHYHQWVௐௐ
7KHௐXVHௐRIௐPDUNHWLQJௐFDPSDLJQVௐSOD\VௐDௐPDMRUௐUROHௐLQௐHQKDQFLQJௐWKHௐJURZWKௐRIௐRXUௐFOLHQWௐGDWDEDVHௐௐ(PDLOVௐ DUHௐDௐELJௐSDUWௐRIௐRXUௐGDLO\ௐOLYHVௐGXHௐWRௐJRYHUQPHQWௐDJHQF\ௐHPSOR\HHVௐXWLOL]LQJௐHPDLOVௐDVௐWKHLUௐPDLQௐVRXUFHௐRIௐ FRPPXQLFDWLRQௐௐ:HௐXVHௐFDPSDLJQHUFRPௐDVௐWKHௐHPDLOLQJௐSODWIRUPௐWRௐUHDFKௐRXUௐWDUJHWௐPHPEHUVௐௐ9LGHRVௐDQGௐ GHVFULSWLYHௐLPDJHVௐDUHௐXVHGௐRQௐDOOௐIO\HUVௐDQGௐDUHௐFRPSDWLEOHௐZLWKௐDௐGHVNWRSௐRUௐPRELOHௐGHYLFHௐௐ0HVVDJHVௐ DUHௐVKRUWௐDQGௐWRௐWKHௐSRLQWௐZLWKௐOLQNVௐOHDGLQJௐWRௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐDQGௐ1$)*ௐKRPHSDJHௐௐ7KHௐ&DPSDLJQHUௐHPDLOௐ V\VWHPௐDOORZVௐWKHௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐWUDFNௐHPDLOௐDFWLYLW\ௐEDVHGௐRQௐRSHQௐUDWHௐXQVXEVFULEHVௐDQGௐOLQNௐFOLFNVௐZKLFKௐLVௐ EHQHILFLDOௐWRௐXQGHUVWDQGLQJௐHPDLOௐHIIHFWLYHQHVVௐௐ
2QFHௐSRWHQWLDOௐPHPEHUVௐDUHௐGLUHFWHGௐWRௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐWKH\ௐDUHௐZHOFRPHGௐZLWKௐDௐZLGHௐUDQJHௐRIௐRSWLRQVௐWRௐ H[SORUHௐDQௐDUUD\ௐRIௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐ7KH\ௐDUHௐDEOHௐWRௐUHJLVWHUௐWRௐEHFRPHௐDௐPHPEHUௐYLHZௐSULFLQJௐ H[SORUHௐDYDLODEOHௐLQVWRFNௐYHKLFOHVௐYLHZௐKRZWRYLGHRVௐEXLOGௐDௐYHKLFOHௐRQOLQHௐWRௐUHTXHVWௐDQௐLPPHGLDWHௐTXRWHௐ RUௐXVHௐRXUௐOLYHௐFKDWௐDVVLVWDQWௐRUௐFDOOHPDLOௐIRUௐOLYHௐVXSSRUWௐ )DFHௐWRௐ)DFHௐ0DUNHWLQJௐ6WUDWHJLHV
ௐௐ7KLVௐVWUDWHJ\ௐKDVௐSURYHQௐWRௐEHௐVXFFHVVIXOௐLQௐJHQHUDWLQJௐOHDGVௐDQGௐ FUHDWLQJௐODVWLQJௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐE\ௐGHYHORSLQJௐJHQXLQHௐFRQQHFWLRQVௐZLWKௐSURVSHFWLYHௐPHPEHUVௐௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ )OHHWௐ*URXSௐDWWHQGVௐVHYHUDOௐWUDGHVௐVKRZVௐSHUௐ\HDUௐWRௐHQJDJHௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐSXWௐDௐIDFHௐWRௐWKHௐFRPSDQ\ௐ7KLVௐ LQௐSHUVRQௐPHHWLQJௐDLGVௐWRௐEXLOGௐWKHௐEUDQGௐE\ௐQXUWXULQJௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐEHWZHHQௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐRWKHUௐYHQGRUVௐ DVVRFLDWHGௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐௐௐ7UDGHௐVKRZVௐDWWHQGHGௐLQFOXGHௐ*);ௐ,$332ௐ1,*3ௐ$&7ௐ&$332ௐDQGௐ &$6%2ௐWKURXJKRXWௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐௐ
1$)*ௐKDVௐPDQ\ௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐWRௐPDNHௐLQௐSHUVRQௐSUHVHQWDWLRQVௐWRௐSURSRVHௐSURGXFWVௐVHUYLFHVௐRIIHUHGௐDQGௐWRௐ DQVZHUௐDQ\ௐTXHVWLRQVௐSRWHQWLDOௐPHPEHUVௐPD\ௐKDYHௐௐ7KHVHௐ3RZHU3RLQWௐ3UHVHQWDWLRQVௐLQFOXGHௐWRSLFVௐRQௐ 1$)*6RXUFHZHOOௐSURFHVVௐKRZௐWRௐIDFLOLWDWHௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐZLWKRXWௐELGGLQJௐLQIRUPDWLRQDOௐYLGHRVௐDQGௐ WKHௐEUDQGVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐZHௐSURYLGHௐ7KHVHௐPHHWLQJVௐKDYHௐEHHQௐKHOGௐDWௐORFDOௐFLWLHVௐFRXQWLHVௐVFKRROௐGLVWULFWVௐ ZDWHUௐGLVWULFWVௐDQGௐSRUWV
5HODWLRQVKLSௐ0DUNHWLQJௐLVௐDௐYLWDOௐVWUDWHJ\ௐXVHGௐLQௐEXLOGLQJௐDQGௐPDLQWDLQLQJௐORQJWHUPௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐSUDFWLFHGௐE\ௐ 1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐRQௐDௐGDLO\ௐEDVLVௐௐ
1$)*ௐVWULYHVௐWRௐFUHDWHௐDௐSRVLWLYHௐDQGௐVXSSRUWLYHௐFRQQHFWLRQௐZLWKௐPHPEHUVௐE\ௐSURYLGLQJௐSHUVRQDOL]HGௐDQGௐ UHVSRQVLYHௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐSUDFWLFHVௐௐ7KHௐVDOHVௐWHDPௐKDVௐZRUNHGௐWLUHOHVVO\ௐWRௐIRFXVௐRQௐSURYLGLQJௐ RXWVWDQGLQJௐFXVWRPHUௐVXSSRUWௐWRௐFUHDWHௐDௐSRZHUIXOௐUDSSRUWௐZLWKௐH[LVWLQJௐDQGௐQHZௐPHPEHUVௐௐ%\ௐJRLQJௐDERYHௐ DQGௐEH\RQGௐWKH\ௐKDYHௐHQKDQFHGௐH[LVWLQJௐUHODWLRQVKLSVௐDQGௐH[HFXWHGௐFXVWRPHUௐOR\DOW\ௐZLWKௐUHSHDWௐEXVLQHVVHVௐௐ 7KH\ௐVWULYHௐWRௐGHYLDWHௐIURPௐWKHௐ³&DUௐ6DOHVSHUVRQ´ௐPHQWDOLW\ௐZKLFKௐLVௐௐVDOHVௐGULYHQௐWRௐDௐPRUHௐSURGXFWௐ DQGௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐDSSURDFKௐE\ௐLQVWLOOLQJௐDௐVHQVHௐRIௐFRQILGHQFHௐLQௐRXUௐFOLHQWVௐௐ7KHௐJRDOௐLVௐWRௐUHJXODUO\ௐ DVVLVWௐFOLHQWVௐDQGௐDGGUHVVௐDQ\ௐQHHGVௐDQGௐFRQFHUQVௐHYHQௐDIWHUௐWKHௐSXUFKDVHௐKDVௐRFFXUUHGௐௐ7KHௐVWULYHௐWRௐ IRFXVௐRQௐVROXWLRQௐVHOOLQJௐYVௐSURGXFWௐVHOOLQJௐGHYHORSVௐLQWRௐDௐPXWXDOO\ௐEHQHILFLDOௐDJUHHPHQWௐIRUௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐ WKHௐEXVLQHVVௐௐ
%HORZௐDUHௐDௐIHZௐH[DPSOHVௐRQௐVXFFHVVIXOௐUHODWLRQVKLSௐPDUNHWLQJௐIURPௐRXUௐ)OHHWௐ'HSDUWPHQW ௐ
:HௐKDGௐDௐPHPEHUௐFDOOௐLQௐWRௐUHTXHVWௐILQDQFLQJOHDVHௐRSWLRQVௐIRUௐDௐWUXFNௐQHHGHGௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ )OHHWௐ*URXS6RXUFHZHOOௐYHKLFOHௐFRQWUDFWௐௐ,ௐFRQWDFWHGௐDQRWKHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐYHQGRUௐ0DWWௐ*HLVHOKDUWௐIURPௐ1&/ௐ *RYௐ&DSLWDOௐDQGௐKHௐZDVௐKDSS\ௐWRௐDVVLVWௐZLWKௐDௐILQDQFLQJௐTXRWHௐௐ7KHௐPHPEHUௐDOVRௐUHTXHVWHGௐWRௐWUDGHௐLQௐDௐ FXUUHQWௐYHKLFOHௐLQௐWKHLUௐIOHHWௐDQGௐZDVௐGLUHFWHGௐWRௐ*RYGHDOVௐIRUௐDVVLVWDQFHௐLQௐUHPRYLQJௐWKHௐRXWGDWHGௐXQLWௐ WKURXJKௐDQௐDXFWLRQௐௐௐ7KHௐPHPEHUௐZDVௐDEOHௐWRௐXWLOL]HௐWKUHHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWVௐWRௐFRPSOHWHௐKLVௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐ ZKLFKௐVLPSOLILHGௐWKHௐHQWLUHௐSURFHVVௐௐ7KHௐPHPEHUௐZDVௐYHU\ௐVDWLVILHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐDPRXQWௐRIௐFDUHௐDQGௐHDVHௐ WKURXJKௐKLVௐH[SHULHQFHௐDQGௐEHFDPHௐDௐUHSHDWௐFXVWRPHUௐௐௐ%\ௐXWLOL]LQJௐDௐFURVVVHOOLQJௐVWUDWHJ\ௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ )OHHWௐ*URXSௐEHFDPHௐKLVௐRQHௐVWRSௐVKRSௐWRௐIXOILOOௐDOOௐIOHHWௐYHKLFOHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐQHHGVௐ ³,ௐKDGௐDௐPHPEHUௐFDOOௐLQௐGHVSHUDWHௐWRௐREWDLQௐDௐQHZௐWUXFNௐEHFDXVHௐDQௐHPSOR\HHௐKDGௐJRWWHQௐLQWRௐDௐVHULRXVௐ DFFLGHQWௐDQGௐKDGௐWKHௐWUXFNௐWRWDOHGௐௐௐௐ'XHௐWRௐFRYLGௐUHVWULFWLRQVௐPRVWௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐDUHௐFXUUHQWO\ௐH[SHULHQFLQJௐ PLFURFKLSௐVKRUWDJHVௐZKLFKௐUHOD\VௐWRௐSURGXFWLRQௐGHOD\VௐDWௐWKHௐIDFWRU\ௐௐ:HௐZHUHௐDEOHௐWRௐGLUHFWௐEX\HUௐWRௐRXUௐLQ VWRFNௐLQYHQWRU\ௐRQௐWKHௐ1$)*ௐZHEVLWHௐDQGௐPHPEHUௐZDVௐHFVWDWLFௐWRௐORFDWHௐWUXFNௐWRௐPHHWௐWKHLUௐQHHGVௐௐௐ,QVWHDGௐ RIௐKDYLQJௐWRௐZDLWௐௐZHHNVௐWRௐUHFHLYHௐWKHௐQHZௐYHKLFOHௐPHPEHUௐZDVௐDEOHௐWRௐREWDLQௐWKHௐQHZௐWUXFNௐZLWKLQௐௐ ZHHNV´


Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
340
³, RQFH KDG D PHPEHU FRQWDFW XV WZR \HDUV DIWHU SXUFKDVLQJ D YHKLFOH IURP XVௐௐௐ7KH\ KDG D PDOIXQFWLRQ ZLWKௐWKHௐOLIWJDWHௐRQௐWKHௐER[ௐWUXFNௐZKLFKௐFDXVHGௐDௐORJLVWLFDOௐQLJKWPDUHௐௐ,ௐZDVௐDEOHௐWRௐFRQWDFWௐRQHௐRIௐRXUௐERG\ௐ YHQGRUVௐWKDWௐXSILWWHGௐWKHௐOLIWௐJDWHௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐDQGௐDௐVHUYLFHௐWHFKQLFLDQௐZDVௐDEOHௐWRௐJRௐRQVLWHௐWRௐUHVROYHௐWKHௐ OLIWJDWHௐLVVXHௐDWௐQRௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWௐௐ7KHௐPHPEHUௐZDVௐYHU\ௐLPSUHVVHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐTXDOLW\ௐRIௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐ HYHQௐDIWHUௐSXUFKDVHௐ³
³,ௐKDGௐDௐPHPEHUௐUHTXHVWௐDௐôௐWRQௐWUXFNௐSULFLQJௐEXWௐZDVௐXQVXUHௐDERXWௐWKHLUௐEXGJHWௐDWௐWKHௐWLPHௐௐௐ,ௐWRRNௐWKHௐ WLPHௐWRௐJRௐWKURXJKௐHDFKௐRSWLRQௐZLWKௐWKHௐFOLHQWௐWRௐSURYLGHௐDௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSULFLQJௐTXRWHௐWKURXJKௐPXOWLSOHௐ PDQXIDFWXUHUVௐIURPௐ5DPௐ&KHYUROHWௐDQGௐ)RUGௐௐ7KLVௐHPSRZHUHGௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐWRௐKDYHௐPXOWLSOHௐSULFLQJௐRSWLRQVௐ IRUௐUHYLHZௐWRௐDOLJQௐZLWKௐWKHLUௐEXGJHWௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐHOLPLQDWLQJௐWKHௐQHHGௐWRௐVKRSௐDQ\ZKHUHௐHOVHௐ³ௐௐ ³:HௐZRUNௐZLWKௐPDQ\ௐERG\ௐFRPSDQLHVௐWRௐDVVLVWௐFXVWRPHUVௐZLWKௐWKHௐERG\ௐXSILWWLQJௐSURFHVVௐௐௐ2QHௐRIௐRXUௐ PHPEHUVௐFDOOHGௐLQௐDௐUHTXHVWௐWRௐH[SHGLWHௐDௐSDUWLFXODUௐYHKLFOHௐWKDWௐZDVௐKHOGௐXSௐDWௐRQHௐRIௐWKHLUௐORFDOௐERG\ௐ XSILWWHUVௐௐௐ,ௐFRQWDFWHGௐWKHௐERG\ௐFRPSDQ\ௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐDQGௐSXWௐLQௐDௐUHTXHVWௐWRௐH[SHGLWHௐWKHௐXSILWWLQJௐSHUௐ UHTXHVWௐRIௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐௐ7KHௐERG\ௐFRPSDQ\ௐZDVௐDEOHௐWRௐFRPSO\ௐZLWKௐWKHௐUHTXHVWௐDQGௐGHOLYHU\ௐZDVௐPDGHௐ VRRQHUௐWKDQௐH[SHFWHG´
:RUGRI0RXWKௐ0DUNHWLQJ
ௐௐ7KHௐSRVLWLYHௐTXDOLW\ௐRIௐVHUYLFHௐKDVௐOHGௐWRௐPRUHௐVDOHVௐEDVHGௐRQௐSUHYLRXVௐ FXVWRPHUV¶ௐLPSUHVVLRQVௐRQௐWKHLUௐH[SHULHQFHௐௐ1$)*¶VௐJRDOௐLVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐH[HPSODU\ௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐ WKURXJKRXWௐWKHௐHQWLUHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐSURFHVVௐWRௐHQFRXUDJHௐUHSHDWௐEXVLQHVVௐDQGௐDGYRFDWHௐVHUYLFHVௐWRௐRWKHUௐ PHPEHUVௐௐ1$)*ௐKDVௐEHHQௐIRUWXQDWHௐWRௐH[SHULHQFHௐPXOWLSOHௐLQVWDQFHVௐRIௐOHDGVௐJHQHUDWHGௐEDVHGௐVROHO\ௐRQௐ ZRUGRIPRXWKௐPDUNHWLQJௐWKRXJKௐRXUௐH[LVWLQJௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ &URVVSURPRWLRQ
ௐௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐLVௐFXUUHQWO\ௐFROODERUDWLQJௐZLWKௐDQRWKHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ9HQGRUௐ1&/ௐ *RYHUQPHQWௐ&DSLWDOௐWRௐSURPRWHௐHDFKௐRWKHU¶VௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐௐ1&/ௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ&DSLWDOௐVSHFLDOL]HVௐLQௐ SURYLGLQJௐFRPSHWLWLYHௐHTXLSPHQWௐILQDQFLQJௐSURJUDPVௐIRUௐPXQLFLSDOLWLHVௐDQGௐSXEOLFௐHGXFDWLRQௐHQWLWLHVௐDFURVVௐWKHௐ 8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐௐ$VௐDௐWHDPௐ1&/ௐDQGௐ1$)*ௐSURGXFHGௐDௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐPDUNHWLQJௐPDWHULDOVௐVXFKௐDVௐYLGHRVௐIO\HUVௐ DQGௐLQIRௐJUDSKVௐWRௐSURPRWHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐDQGௐOHDVLQJௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐௐௐௐ +RJOXQGௐ%XVௐ&RPSDQ\ௐLVௐDQRWKHUௐFURVVSURPRWLRQௐYHQGRUௐ1$)*ௐKDGௐWKHௐRSSRUWXQLW\ௐWRௐFUHDWHௐDௐSDUWQHUVKLSௐ ZLWKௐௐௐ)O\HUVௐZHUHௐFUHDWHGௐWRௐDGYHUWLVHௐ&KDVVLVௐIURPௐ1$)*ௐDORQJௐZLWKௐDௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐEXVௐERGLHVௐIURPௐ+RJOXQGௐ %XVௐ&RPSDQ\ௐௐௐ
:LWKௐFURVVSURPRWLRQௐFRPSDQLHVௐH[FKDQJHௐNQRZOHGJHௐDQGௐSURYLGHௐHQGRUVHPHQWVௐRQௐZHEVLWHVௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐ DQGௐHPDLOௐFDPSDLJQVௐௐ7KLVௐVWUDWHJ\ௐFUHDWHVௐDQௐLQIOX[ௐRIௐQHZௐOHDGVௐEUDQGௐDZDUHQHVVௐLQFUHDVHGௐVDOHVௐDQGௐ UHFXUUHQFHௐRIௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐZLOOௐFRQWLQXHௐWRௐFUHDWHௐQHZௐSDUWQHUVKLSVௐDQGௐIDFLOLWDWHௐ PRUHௐFURVVSURPRWLRQௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐLQௐWKHௐQHDUௐIXWXUHௐWRௐSURYLGHௐWXUQNH\ௐVROXWLRQVௐIRUௐDௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐYHKLFOHௐ SXUFKDVLQJௐQHHGVௐ
&RPLQJௐLQௐௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐZLOOௐEHௐODXQFKLQJௐDௐ1$)*ௐ3DUWQHUௐ:HEVLWHௐWRௐIXUWKHUௐLQFUHDVHௐ EXVLQHVVௐJURZWKௐௐ7KHௐZHEVLWHௐZZZQDIJSDUWQHUFRPௐLVௐH[SHFWHGௐWRௐODXQFKௐQH[Wௐ\HDUௐLQௐௐௐ7KHௐVLWHௐ HQFRXUDJHVௐERG\ௐXSILWWLQJௐFRPSDQLHVௐWKURXJKRXWௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐWRௐSDUWQHUௐXSௐZLWKௐ1$)*ௐWRௐEHFRPHௐDௐ SUHIHUUHGௐPHPEHUௐௐ7KHௐEHQHILWVௐRIௐEHFRPLQJௐDௐSUHIHUUHGௐPHPEHUௐLQFOXGHௐHQGRUVHPHQWVௐRQௐZHEVLWHௐDQGௐ VRFLDOௐPHGLDௐDYHQXHVௐDORQJௐZLWKௐZRUGRIPRXWKௐUHIHUUDOௐIRUௐFOLHQWVௐZLWKௐXSILWWLQJௐQHHGVௐௐ2XUௐGHGLFDWHGௐSXEOLFௐ UHODWLRQVௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐZLOOௐFRQGXFWௐSKRQHௐDQGௐLQௐSHUVRQௐPHHWLQJVௐWRௐGLVFXVVௐWKHௐDGYDQWDJHVௐRIௐSDUWQHULQJௐXSௐ ZLWKௐ1$)*ௐWKHUHIRUHௐJHQHUDWLQJௐPRUHௐFURVVSURPRWLRQௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐ 0HPEHUVௐIURPௐJRYHUQPHQWௐDJHQFLHVௐDUHௐHQFRXUDJHGௐWRௐJRௐRQௐWKHௐVLWHௐWRௐVHDUFKௐIRUௐORFDOௐERG\ௐXSILWWLQJௐ FRPSDQLHVௐWKH\ௐDUHௐLQWHUHVWHGௐLQௐZRUNLQJௐZLWKௐௐௐ$VௐDௐSUHUHTXLVLWHௐLQௐEHFRPLQJௐDௐSUHIHUUHGௐYHQGRUௐWKH\ௐDUHௐ UHTXLUHGௐWRௐDGYHUWLVHௐ1$)*ௐDQGௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐRQௐWKHLUௐEXVLQHVVௐZHEVLWHௐDQGௐUHIHUௐWKHLUௐFOLHQWVௐWRௐ SXUFKDVHௐWKHLUௐFDEFKDVVLVௐQHHGVௐWKURXJKௐ1$)*ௐௐ7KLVௐHVWDEOLVKHVௐDௐSDUWQHUVKLSௐWKDWௐZLOOௐJHQHUDWHௐLQFUHDVHGௐ VDOHVௐDOOௐDURXQGௐௐ:HௐDUHௐVWLOOௐFXUUHQWO\ௐEXLOGLQJௐWKHௐZHEVLWHௐDQGௐLQWHUDFWLQJௐZLWKௐERG\ௐFRPSDQLHVௐDFURVVௐWKHௐ 8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐEHௐLQWHUHVWHGௐLQௐSDUWQHULQJௐXSௐZLWKௐ1$)* Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
341
 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐXVHௐRIௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐDQGௐGLJLWDOௐ
GDWDௐ
HJௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐPHWDGDWDௐXVDJH
ௐWRௐ
HQKDQFHௐPDUNHWLQJௐHIIHFWLYHQHVV
6RFLDOௐPHGLDௐSOD\VௐDௐFUXFLDOௐHOHPHQWௐLQௐWKHௐZD\ௐSHRSOHௐFRPPXQLFDWHௐDQGௐFRQQHFWௐZLWKௐHDFKௐRWKHUௐௐௐௐ /LQNHG,QௐLVௐWKHௐJRWRௐSODWIRUPௐXVHGௐE\ௐ1$)*ௐDVௐLWௐRIIHUVௐDௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐZD\VௐWRௐH[SDQGௐRXUௐQHWZRUNௐE\ௐORFDWLQJௐ DQGௐFRQQHFWLQJௐZLWKௐUHOHYDQWௐSURIHVVLRQDOVௐLQௐWKHௐLQGXVWU\ௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐKDVௐXWLOL]HGௐ/LQNHG,QௐWRௐ HQJDJHௐFXUUHQWௐDQGௐSRWHQWLDOௐPHPEHUVௐWKURXJKௐSHUVRQDOL]HGௐPHVVDJHVௐDQGௐSRVWVௐௐ3HUVRQDOL]HGௐPHVVDJHVௐ LQFOXGHௐWKDQNLQJௐWKHPௐIRUௐUHJLVWHULQJௐRQௐVLWHௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐGLUHFWLQJௐWKHPௐWRௐRQௐRXUௐOLQNௐWRௐWKHௐZHEVLWHௐ/LQNHG,Qௐ <RX7XEHௐ)DFHERRNௐDQGௐ,QVWDJUDPௐFRPSDQ\ௐSDJHVௐௐ7KHௐJRDOௐLVௐWRௐXQLWHௐZLWKௐSHRSOHௐDOUHDG\ௐRQௐRXUௐ GDWDEDVHௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐSHRSOHௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐEHQHILWௐIURPௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐௐ&XUUHQWௐIO\HUVௐRUௐPHVVDJHVௐ DERXWௐRXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐDUHௐDOVRௐSRVWHGௐRQௐWKHௐ/LQNHG,QௐVLWHௐWRௐJHQHUDWHௐDQGௐDWWUDFWௐPRUHௐEXVLQHVVௐௐ7LPHௐLVௐ DOVRௐVSHQWௐRQௐUHDGLQJௐSRVWVௐIURPௐFRQQHFWLRQVௐDQGௐREVHUYHௐDQ\ௐQHHGVௐWKDWௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐPD\ௐ DVVLVWௐZLWKௐௐ
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐKDVௐEHJXQௐXWLOL]LQJௐYLGHRௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJLHVௐWRௐIXUWKHUௐSURPRWHௐDQGௐPDUNHWௐ SURGXFWVௐE\ௐHQJDJLQJௐRQௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐFKDQQHOVௐDQGௐHPDLOௐIO\HUVௐௐ3URJUDPVௐVXFKௐDVௐ9LPHRௐ9LGHRௐ6FULEHௐ &DUWRRQௐ$QLPDWRUௐ$GREHௐ$QLPDWHௐ,OOXVWUDWHௐ&DSWLYHௐ3KRWRVKRSௐDQGௐ0RYDYLௐ9LGHRௐ(GLWRUௐ3OXVௐDUHௐHPSOR\HGௐ WRௐHGLWௐDQGௐFUHDWHௐYLGHRVௐWRௐDVVLVWௐLQௐHQGRUVLQJௐRXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐௐ7KHௐIROORZLQJௐYLGHRVௐZHUHௐUHFHQWO\ௐFUHDWHGௐE\ௐ RXUௐPDUNHWLQJௐGHSDUWPHQWௐDORQJௐZLWKௐRXWVLGHௐYLGHRௐSURGXFWLRQௐFRPSDQLHV

([SODLQHUௐ9LGHR
ௐௐ7KHௐILUVWௐYLGHRௐFUHDWHGௐZDVௐDௐ
ௐVHFRQGௐH[SODLQHUௐYLGHRௐDERXWௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐ WKDWௐXVHGௐDQLPDWHGௐFKDUDFWHUVௐWRௐYLVXDOL]HௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐDORQJௐZLWKௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐRQௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ DZDUGHGௐFRQWUDFWௐௐ7KHௐYLGHRௐKDVௐEHHQௐLQFRUSRUDWHGௐLQWRௐDOOௐRXUௐZHHNO\ௐHPDLOௐIO\HUVௐDQGௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐ SODWIRUPVௐDVௐDQௐLQIRUPDWLYHௐYLGHRௐRQௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐKRZௐWRௐSXUFKDVHௐYHKLFOHVௐRIIௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ &RQWUDFW
+RZௐ7Rௐ9LGHRV
ௐௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐKDVௐDOVRௐFUHDWHGௐVWHSE\VWHSௐ+RZ7RௐYLGHRVௐRQௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐWRௐ SXUFKDVHௐERWKௐ/LJKWௐ'XW\ௐDQGௐ+HDY\'XW\ௐYHKLFOHVௐRIIௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐௐ ,Qௐ6WRFNௐ9HKLFOHV
ௐௐ7KLVௐYLGHRௐVKRZFDVHVௐRXUௐLQVWRFNௐYHKLFOHVௐDYDLODEOHௐDQGௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐRIௐUHTXHVWLQJௐDௐ TXRWHௐ
(7$ௐ7UDFNLQJௐ6\VWHP
ௐௐ7KLVௐYLGHRௐZDVௐFUHDWHGௐWRௐQRWௐRQO\ௐLQWURGXFHௐEXWௐWRௐHQFRXUDJHௐFOLHQWVௐWRௐVHOIWUDFNௐ WKHLUௐYHKLFOHௐVWDWXVௐௐ
+ROLGD\ௐ7KHPHGௐ9LGHRV
ௐ7KHVHௐDPXVLQJௐYLGHRVௐZHUHௐFUHDWHGௐWRௐFHOHEUDWHௐWKHௐKROLGD\VௐDQGௐDGGௐKXPRUௐDQGௐ OLJKWQHVVௐWRௐRXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐDQGௐSURGXFWVௐVROGௐௐ
&URVVௐ3URPRWLRQௐ9LGHR
ௐௐ7KLVௐYLGHRௐPDUNHWVௐRXUௐUHODWLRQVKLSௐZLWKௐ1&/ௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ&DSLWDOௐDQGௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐWRௐ HQGRUVHௐ(9ௐYHKLFOHVௐௐ
9LGHRVௐIRUௐVRFLDOௐPHGLD
ௐௐ0LQLௐYLGHRVௐZHUHௐFUHDWHGௐWRௐDGYHUWLVHௐQHZௐYHKLFOHVௐDYDLODEOHௐSULFLQJௐDQGௐFXWRIIௐ GDWHௐUHPLQGHUVௐௐ
1$)*ௐKDVௐUHFHQWO\ௐLQWURGXFHGௐDௐQHZO\ௐEXLOWௐOLYHௐFKDWௐIHDWXUHௐRQௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐIRUௐFXVWRPHUௐFRQYHQLHQFHௐDVௐZHOOௐ DVௐLPSURYLQJௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐௐ9LVLWRUVௐKDYHௐDFFHVVௐWRௐFKDWௐZLWKௐDௐOLYHௐVDOHVௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐௐKRXUVௐDௐGD\ௐ ௐGD\VௐDௐZHHNௐௐ:LWKௐWKLVௐIHDWXUHௐSRWHQWLDOௐFXVWRPHUVௐDUHௐSURYLGHGௐZLWKௐDQRWKHUௐDYHQXHௐIRUௐDVVLVWDQFHௐLQௐ DGGLWLRQௐWRௐHPDLOLQJௐDQGௐSKRQHௐFDOOVௐௐ7KHௐEHQHILWVௐRIௐDௐOLYHௐFKDWௐRSWLRQௐLQFOXGHௐTXLFNHUௐUHVSRQVHௐWLPHௐWRௐ DVVLVWௐEX\HUVௐLQௐUHDFKLQJௐDௐSXUFKDVLQJௐGHFLVLRQௐDQGௐDQVZHUௐWKHLUௐTXHVWLRQVௐ ,PSURYLQJௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐZLOOௐDOVRௐOHDGௐWRௐLQFUHDVHGௐVDOHVௐFXVWRPHUௐOR\DOW\ௐDQGௐHQJDJHPHQWௐௐ0DQ\ௐVWXGLHVௐ KDYHௐVKRZQௐDௐVWURQJௐFRUUHODWLRQௐEHWZHHQௐOLYHௐFKDWௐDQGௐLQFUHDVHௐLQௐFRQYHUVLRQௐUDWHVௐௐ3RWHQWLDOௐFOLHQWVௐ DSSUHFLDWHௐKDYLQJௐWKHLUௐTXHVWLRQVௐDQVZHUHGௐLQௐUHDOWLPHௐZKHQௐWU\LQJௐWRௐEXLOGௐDௐYHKLFOHௐTXRWHௐRQOLQHௐDQGௐ DOORZLQJௐWKHௐXVHUௐWRௐPXOWLWDVNௐGLIIHUHQWௐSURMHFWV


 ,Qௐ\RXUௐYLHZௐZKDWௐLVௐ6RXUFHZHOO¶VௐUROHௐLQௐ
SURPRWLQJௐFRQWUDFWVௐDULVLQJௐRXWௐRIௐWKLVௐ5)3"ௐ
+RZௐZLOOௐ\RXௐLQWHJUDWHௐDௐ6RXUFHZHOODZDUGHGௐ
FRQWUDFWௐLQWRௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐSURFHVV"
6RXUFHZHOO¶VௐPLVVLRQௐVWDWHV
ௐ³2XUௐFRPPLWPHQWௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐDQGௐH[FHHGLQJௐFOLHQWௐH[SHFWDWLRQV´ௐௐ7KLVௐVWDWHPHQWௐ LQWHJUDWHVௐZLWKௐRXUௐUHODWLRQVKLSௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJ\ௐZLWKௐRXUௐFRPPLWPHQWௐWRௐJRௐDERYHௐDQGௐEH\RQGௐIRUௐDOOௐRXUௐ PHPEHUVௐௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐLVௐDௐWUXVWHGௐEUDQGௐWKDWௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐFDQௐUHO\ௐRQௐWRௐDFFHVVௐDௐZLGHௐYDULHW\ௐRIௐ SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐIRUௐWKHLUௐHYHU\GD\ௐQHHGVௐௐ:LWKௐRYHUௐௐ\HDUVௐRIௐSDUWQHUVKLSVௐDQGௐUHODWLRQVKLSௐEXLOGLQJௐ WKH\ௐDUHௐWKHௐJOXHௐWKDWௐFRQQHFWVௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHGXFDWLRQௐDQGௐQRQSURILWௐDJHQFLHVௐWRௐFRPSDQLHVௐRIௐDOOௐVL]HVௐWRௐ RIIHUௐWXUQNH\ௐVROXWLRQVௐWRௐWKHLUௐQHHGVௐௐௐௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐLVௐDOVRௐDௐUHOLDEOHௐUHVRXUFHௐIRUௐYHQGRUVௐE\ௐQRWௐRQO\ௐFRQQHFWLQJௐZLWKௐSRWHQWLDOௐSURVSHFWVௐEXWௐE\ௐ SURYLGLQJௐYDOXDEOHௐPDUNHWLQJௐPDWHULDOVௐUHDGLO\ௐDYDLODEOHௐIRUௐGRZQORDGௐRQௐWKHLUௐZHEVLWHௐௐ5HVRXUFHVௐDQGௐWRROVௐ SURYLGHGௐLQFOXGHௐIO\HUVௐYHQGRUௐWUDLQLQJௐYLGHRVௐDORQJௐZLWKௐFRPSOLDQFHௐLQIRUPDWLRQ 7KHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐEUDQGௐLQWHJUDWHVௐDௐWKRURXJKௐGRFXPHQWDWLRQௐUHYLHZௐRIௐDOOௐYHQGRUVௐSULRUௐWRௐDZDUGLQJௐWKHLUௐ FRRSHUDWLYHௐFRQWUDFWVௐWRௐHQVXUHௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐDUHௐIURPௐUHSXWDEOHௐYHQGRUVௐௐ7KHௐEUDQGௐSURYLGHVௐDௐ VHQVHௐRIௐOHJLWLPDF\ௐRIௐRXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐQDPHௐDQGௐPHPEHUVௐUHFRJQL]HௐWKDWௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐDUHௐIURPௐ UHOLDEOHௐVRXUFHVௐWKDWௐZLOOௐPHHWௐWKHLUௐQHHGVௐௐ
6RXUFHZHOO¶VௐDLPௐLVௐWRௐVLPSOLI\ௐWKHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐDQGௐSURFXUHPHQWௐSURFHVVௐRIௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐE\ௐHOLPLQDWLQJௐ WKHௐFRVWO\ௐELGGLQJௐSURFHGXUHௐௐ7KHௐSURFHVVௐRIௐUHVHDUFKLQJௐWKHௐULJKWௐYHQGRUௐLVௐQRWௐRQO\ௐVWUHVVIXOௐDQGௐWLPH FRQVXPLQJௐEXWௐFDQௐEHௐH[SHQVLYHௐDVௐZHOOௐௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐKDVௐFRPSOHWHGௐWKHௐELGGLQJௐIRUௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐ ZKLFKௐVLPSOLILHVௐWKHௐRYHUDOOௐSXUFKDVLQJௐSURFHVVௐE\ௐSURYLGLQJௐDFFHVVௐWRௐFRPSHWLWLYHO\ௐELGௐFRQWUDFWVௐSURFXUHGௐE\ௐ DௐJRYHUQPHQWௐDJHQF\ௐௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐKDVௐSURYLGHGௐ1$)*ௐZLWKௐRYHUZKHOPLQJௐRSSRUWXQLWLHVௐWRௐZRUNௐZLWKௐJRYHUQPHQWௐDJHQFLHVௐDFURVVௐWKHௐ 8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐௐ7KHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐQDPHௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDௐKLJKௐVWDQGDUGௐRIௐLQWHJULW\ௐDQGௐHWKLFVௐZKLFKௐLVௐDௐG\QDPLFௐ 1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐLVௐSURXGௐWRௐEHௐSDUWௐRIௐௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐPHPEHUVௐKDYHௐDFFHVVௐWRௐDௐFRQWUDFWௐWKDWௐLVௐ PRUHௐIOH[LEOHௐWKDQௐWKHௐVWDQGDUGௐELGGLQJௐSURFHVVௐௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐLVௐDQௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐWKDWௐDLGVௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐ WRௐVWD\ௐFRPSHWLWLYHௐZLWKRXWௐWKHௐIUXVWUDWLRQVௐDQGௐLVVXHVௐLQYROYHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐELGGLQJௐSURFHVVௐௐ7KLVௐ FRQWUDFWௐFDQௐEHௐFXVWRPL]HGௐWRௐPHHWௐWKHௐXQLTXHௐQHHGVௐRIௐHDFKௐFOLHQWௐௐ7KHௐVDOHVௐWHDPௐKDVௐLQFRUSRUDWHGௐQRWௐ RQO\ௐWKLVௐVWDQGDUGௐRIௐLQWHJULW\ௐLQௐWKHLUௐVDOHVௐSUDFWLFHௐHQVXULQJௐFOLHQWV¶ௐSXUFKDVLQJௐQHHGVௐZLOOௐDOZD\VௐEHௐPHWௐௐ 7KHௐFRVWௐVDYLQJVௐDQGௐVWUHVVIUHHௐQDWXUHௐRIௐWKHௐFRRSHUDWLYHௐFRQWUDFWVௐIDYRUVௐWKDWௐRIௐWKHௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐELGGLQJௐ SURFHVVௐௐ,WௐHQDEOHVௐYHQGRUVௐWRௐZRUNௐZLWKௐTXDOLI\LQJௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHQWLWLHVௐLQௐDௐPRUHௐHIILFLHQWௐPDQQHUௐௐ:HௐYRZௐ WRௐPDLQWDLQௐWKHVHௐOHYHOVௐRIௐVWDQGDUGVௐDFURVVௐWKHௐERDUGௐWKURXJKRXWௐDOOௐGHSDUWPHQWVௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐFRPSDQ\ 

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
342
 $UHௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐDYDLODEOHௐ
WKURXJKௐDQௐHSURFXUHPHQWௐRUGHULQJௐSURFHVV"ௐ,Iௐ
VRௐGHVFULEHௐ\RXUௐHSURFXUHPHQWௐV\VWHPௐDQGௐ
KRZௐJRYHUQPHQWDOௐDQGௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐFXVWRPHUVௐ
KDYHௐXVHGௐLW
2XUௐZHEVLWHௐSURYLGHVௐDௐKDQGVRQௐHPSRZHULQJௐDSSURDFKௐWRௐRUGHULQJௐYHKLFOHVௐRQOLQHௐௐ&OLHQWVௐFDQௐVHDUFKௐ WKURXJKௐPDQ\ௐYHKLFOHVௐPDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOVௐZLWKௐWKHௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐFXVWRPL]HௐDௐYHKLFOHௐWDLORUHGௐWRௐWKHLUௐVSHFLILFௐ QHHGVௐRIௐWKHLUௐDJHQF\ௐௐௐ$ௐSHUVRQDOL]HGௐTXRWHௐZLWKௐSULFLQJௐFDQௐEHௐDYDLODEOHௐLQௐDVௐOLWWOHௐDVௐௐPLQXWHVௐ GHSHQGLQJௐRQௐWKHௐFRPSOH[LW\ௐRIௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐௐௐ,IௐXSILWWLQJௐLVௐQHHGHGௐWKHௐEX\HUௐFDQௐOLVWௐWKHௐGHWDLOVௐRIௐWKHௐXSILWௐ ZKLOHௐEXLOGLQJௐWKHLUௐYHKLFOHௐRQௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐWRௐUHFHLYHௐDௐFRPSOHWHௐTXRWHௐRUௐDௐVDOHVௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐFDQௐEHௐ UHDFKHGௐWKURXJKௐSKRQHௐHPDLOௐRUௐRXUௐQHZௐOLYHௐFKDWௐIHDWXUHௐEXLOWௐRQௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐௐ :HௐKDYHௐUHFHQWO\ௐFUHDWHGௐDQGௐXSORDGHGௐDௐ³+RZ7Rௐ9LGHRV´ௐVHFWLRQௐRQௐWKHௐKRPHSDJHௐRIௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐZKLFKௐ KLJKOLJKWVௐDௐVWHSE\VWHSௐSURFHVVௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐEXLOGௐDQௐRQOLQHௐTXRWHௐௐ7KLVௐLQIRUPDWLYHௐYLGHRௐGHPRQVWUDWHVௐKRZௐ WRௐQDYLJDWHௐWKHௐZHEVLWHௐLQௐKRZௐWRௐJHQHUDWHௐDௐYHKLFOHௐTXRWHௐZLWKௐRUௐZLWKRXWௐXSILWWLQJௐRSWLRQVௐௐ,WௐEHJLQVௐE\ௐ H[SODLQLQJௐKRZௐWRௐUHJLVWHUௐRQௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐDVௐDௐPHPEHUௐDQGௐWKHQௐGHWDLOVௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐVHOHFWௐYHKLFOHௐPRGHOௐDQGௐ W\SHௐDQGௐWKHௐIDFWRU\ௐRSWLRQVௐQHHGHGௐௐௐ
2QFHௐDௐFXVWRPL]HGௐTXRWHௐLVௐEXLOWௐFOLHQWVௐKDYHௐWKHௐRSWLRQௐWRௐILQDOL]HௐWKHௐVDOHVௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐE\ௐVXEPLWWLQJௐDௐ SXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐWRௐRXUௐVDOHVௐWHDPௐYLDௐHPDLOௐௐ7KLVௐJLYHVௐFRPSOHWHௐDXWRQRP\ௐWRௐWKHௐFOLHQWௐWRௐSXUFKDVHௐYHKLFOHVௐ ZLWKRXWௐWKHௐQHHGௐWRௐVSHDNௐWRௐDௐVDOHVௐUHSௐௐ,IௐDVVLVWDQFHௐLVௐQHHGHGௐWKH\ௐFDQௐFRQWDFWௐVDOHVௐWKURXJKௐHPDLOௐOLYHௐ FKDWௐRUௐSKRQHௐௐ
,IௐDVVLVWDQFHௐLVௐUHTXLUHGௐWRௐEXLOGௐDௐTXRWHௐRXUௐVDOHVௐUHSௐLVௐDOVRௐDYDLODEOHௐWRௐZDONௐDௐFOLHQWௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐH SURFXUHPHQWௐSURFHVVௐVWHSௐE\ௐVWHSௐௐ7KLVௐHQVXUHVௐVRPHRQHௐLVௐDYDLODEOHௐWRௐDQVZHUௐDQ\ௐTXHVWLRQVௐLIௐQHHGHGௐ DQGௐHPSRZHULQJௐWKHௐFOLHQWௐWRௐPDNHௐDQ\ௐIXWXUHௐSXUFKDVHVௐRQௐWKHLUௐRZQௐௐ&OLHQWVௐPD\ௐDOVRௐFDOOௐRUௐHPDLOௐWKHௐ QHHGVௐRIௐWKHௐFRPSDQ\ௐDQGௐUHFHLYHௐDௐFXVWRPL]HGௐYHKLFOHௐTXRWH 

7DEOH
9DOXH$GGHG$WWULEXWHV
/LQH,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH


'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSURGXFWௐHTXLSPHQWௐ
PDLQWHQDQFHௐRUௐRSHUDWRUௐWUDLQLQJௐ
SURJUDPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐRIIHUௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ
SDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐ,QFOXGHௐGHWDLOVௐVXFKௐ
DVௐZKHWKHUௐWUDLQLQJௐLVௐVWDQGDUGௐRUௐ
RSWLRQDOௐZKRௐSURYLGHVௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐDQ\ௐ
FRVWVௐWKDWௐDSSO\
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐH[WHQGVௐDQ\ௐDQGௐDOOௐSURGXFWௐHTXLSPHQWௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐDQGௐRSHUDWLQJௐSURJUDPVௐ SURYLGHGௐE\ௐWKHௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUௐGLUHFWO\ௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐGXULQJௐWKHௐTXRWLQJௐSURFHVVௐ7KHௐ PDQXIDFWXUHUௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐTXRWHVௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐEDVHGௐRQௐWKHௐYHKLFOHVௐFODVVௐDQGௐVL]HௐDQGௐJHRJUDSKLFௐORFDWLRQௐ 1$)*ௐZLOOௐDOZD\VௐSDVVௐWKHVHௐTXRWHVௐRQWRௐPHPEHUVௐDQGௐWUHDWௐWKHPௐOLNHௐDQௐXSILWௐWRௐWKHௐYHKLFOH 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐWHFKQRORJLFDOௐDGYDQFHVௐWKDWௐ
\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐRIIHU
7HFKQRORJLFDOௐDFFRPSOLVKPHQWVௐE\ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHVௐOLNHௐ)RUGௐ0RWRUௐ&RPSDQ\ௐDQGௐ*HQHUDOௐ0RWRUVௐVHUYHௐPHPEHUVௐ E\ௐNHHSLQJௐPDQ\ௐPRGHOVௐDYDLODEOHௐIRUௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐFKRRVHௐIURPௐ$GGLWLRQDOO\ௐ1$)*ௐDOORZVௐPHPEHUVௐWKHௐDELOLW\ௐ WRௐFKRRVHௐWRௐHOHFWULI\ௐWKHLUௐYHKLFOHௐE\ௐRSWLQJௐLQWRௐWKHௐ0RWLYHௐ3RZHUௐ6\VWHPVௐZHௐFDQௐVWLOOௐKHOSௐVXSSO\ௐWKLVௐNLQGௐ RIௐDQௐXSILWௐ)RUௐPRUHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐZHௐKDYHௐDWWDFKHGௐWKHௐSURGXFWௐDQGௐSULFLQJௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐ³8SILWVௐ $YDLODEOH´ௐDQGௐ³$OOௐௐ0DQXIDFWXUHV´ௐ=,3ௐILOHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐVXSSRUWLQJௐGRFXPHQWVௐSRUWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐDSSOLFDWLRQ 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐ³JUHHQ´ௐLQLWLDWLYHVௐWKDWௐUHODWHௐ
WRௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRUௐWRௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐ
VHUYLFHVௐDQGௐLQFOXGHௐDௐOLVWௐRIௐWKHௐ
FHUWLI\LQJௐDJHQF\ௐIRUௐHDFK
ௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐKHOSHGௐFUHDWHௐWKHௐ&OLPDWHௐ0D\RUௐ3XUFKDVLQJௐ&ROODERUDWLYHௐE\ௐSDUWQHULQJௐZLWKௐRYHUௐ ௐ0D\RUVௐQDWLRQZLGHௐ7KLVௐLQLWLDWLYHௐZDVௐFUHDWHGௐIRUௐWKHௐEHQHILWௐRIௐPHPEHUVௐZKRௐZDQWHGௐWRௐFUHDWHௐDQGௐ VXVWDLQௐDQௐDOOHOHFWULFௐIOHHWௐ:HௐRIIHUௐௐSXUHO\ௐHOHFWULFௐYHKLFOHVௐ\RXUௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐFKRRVHௐIURPௐ6RPHௐSRSXODUௐ PRGHOVௐLQFOXGHௐWKHௐ&KHYUROHWௐ%ROWௐ)RUGௐ)XVLRQௐ)RUGௐ0XVWDQJௐ0DFK(ௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐ)RUG¶VௐDOOௐHOHFWULFௐ)ௐ:Hௐ DUHௐFRQILGHQWௐWKDWௐDVௐPRUHௐ2(0¶VௐFRQWLQXHௐWRௐPDQXIDFWXUHௐQHZௐHOHFWULFௐYHKLFOHVௐZHௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐWKHPௐIRUௐ PHPEHUVௐWRௐVHOHFWௐIURPௐ0RUHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDERXWௐWKLVௐLQLWLDWLYHௐFDQௐEHௐIRXQGௐDWௐZZZ'ULYHHYIOHHWRUJ 

 ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐWKLUGSDUW\ௐLVVXHGௐHFRODEHOVௐ
UDWLQJVௐRUௐFHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐ
KDVௐUHFHLYHGௐIRUௐWKHௐHTXLSPHQWௐRUௐ
SURGXFWVௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐ\RXUௐ3URSRVDOௐUHODWHGௐ
WRௐHQHUJ\ௐHIILFLHQF\ௐRUௐFRQVHUYDWLRQௐOLIH
F\FOHௐGHVLJQௐ
FUDGOHWRFUDGOH
ௐRUௐRWKHUௐ
JUHHQVXVWDLQDELOLW\ௐIDFWRUV
1$)*ௐKDVௐWKHௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐ$LUௐ5HVRXUFHௐ%RDUGௐ
&$5%
ௐ&HUWLILFDWHௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐWKHௐ)RUGௐ4XDOLILHGௐ9HKLFOHௐ0RGLILHUௐ &HUWLILFDWHௐRQௐILOHௐZLWKௐVRPHௐRIௐRXUௐSDUWQHUௐVXSSOLHUVௐDQGௐXSILWWHUVௐKROGௐWKHVHௐFHUWLILFDWLRQVௐDQGௐWKHVHௐ FHUWLILFDWLRQVௐKHOSௐLOOXVWUDWHௐKRZௐHDFKௐYHKLFOHௐFRQVHUYHVௐHQHUJ\ௐDQGௐUHPDLQVௐHQHUJ\ௐHIILFLHQW 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐ:RPHQௐRUௐ0LQRULW\ௐ
%XVLQHVVௐ(QWLW\ௐ
:0%(
ௐ6PDOOௐ%XVLQHVVௐ
(QWLW\ௐ
6%(
ௐRUௐYHWHUDQௐRZQHGௐEXVLQHVVௐ
FHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRUௐKXEௐ
SDUWQHUVௐKDYHௐREWDLQHGௐ8SORDGௐ
GRFXPHQWDWLRQௐRIௐFHUWLILFDWLRQௐ
DVௐ

DSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐ
VHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
1$)*ௐKROGVௐDௐFXUUHQWௐSDUWQHUVKLSௐZLWKௐPDQ\ௐVXSSOLHUVௐVRPHௐRIௐZKLFKௐDUHௐYHWHUDQௐRZHGௐVXFKௐDVௐ3DFLILFௐ7UXFNௐ %RG\ௐORFDWHGௐLQௐ&$ௐ2XUௐ)RUGௐ&KHYUROHWௐDQGௐ5DP-HHS'RGJH&KU\VOHUௐVWRUHVௐDUHௐMRLQWO\ௐRZQHGௐDQGௐRSHUDWHGௐ E\ௐ0LQRULWLHV


 :KDWௐXQLTXHௐDWWULEXWHVௐGRHVௐ\RXUௐ
FRPSDQ\ௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHVௐ
RIIHUௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHV"ௐ
:KDWௐPDNHVௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐVROXWLRQVௐ
XQLTXHௐLQௐ\RXUௐLQGXVWU\ௐDVௐLWௐDSSOLHVௐWRௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHV"
ௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐZDVௐQRWௐRQO\ௐEXLOWௐRQௐGHGLFDWLRQௐDQGௐKDUGௐZRUNௐEXWௐDOVRௐWKURXJKௐTXDQWLILDEOHௐ PHWULFVௐWKDWௐGLUHFWO\ௐPHDVXUHௐWKHௐUHVXOWVௐRIௐRXUௐHIIRUWVௐWRௐHQVXUHௐUHDOௐJRDOVௐDUHௐEHLQJௐPHDVXUHGௐDQGௐPHWௐ 7KURXJKௐPHDVXULQJௐUHVXOWVௐ1$)*ௐWDNHVௐUHVSRQVLELOLW\ௐLQௐHQVXULQJௐZHௐGHOLYHUௐRQO\ௐWKHௐEHVWௐFXVWRPHUௐFDUHௐWRௐ \RXUௐPHPEHUVௐ1$)*ௐRIIHUVௐPHPEHUVௐௐKRXUௐZHEVLWHௐDFFHVVௐWRௐFXVWRPHUௐVXSSRUWௐWRௐSHUVRQDEO\ௐZDONௐ PHPEHUVௐWKURXJKௐDQ\ௐTXHVWLRQVௐWKH\ௐPD\ௐKDYHௐ1RௐPDWWHUௐZKDWௐWKHௐLVVXHௐPD\ௐEHௐZHௐDOZD\VௐWKLQNௐRXWVLGHௐWKHௐ ER[ௐWRௐKHOSௐPHPEHUVௐILQGௐDௐVROXWLRQ


Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
343
7DEOH
$
:DUUDQW\
'HVFULEHLQGHWDLO\RXUPDQXIDFWXUHUZDUUDQW\SURJUDPLQFOXGLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWVWRTXDOLI\FODLPVSURFHGXUHDQGRYHUDOOVWUXFWXUH<RX PD\XSORDGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHVRI\RXUZDUUDQW\PDWHULDOV LIDSSOLFDEOH
LQWKHGRFXPHQWXSORDGVHFWLRQRI\RXUUHVSRQVHLQDGGLWLRQWR UHVSRQGLQJWRWKHTXHVWLRQVEHORZ
/LQH,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐFRYHUௐDOOௐSURGXFWVௐSDUWVௐDQGௐODERU" (DFKௐRIௐWKHௐௐPDQXIDFWXUHVௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐFRYHUௐWKHLUௐRZQௐSURGXFWVௐSDUWVௐDQGௐODERUௐ$OOௐ ZDUUDQW\ௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐPD\ௐEHௐIRXQGௐLQௐRXUௐDWWDFKPHQWVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ=,3ௐ)LOHௐ³$OOௐௐ 0DQXIDFWXUHV´


 'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐLPSRVHௐXVDJHௐUHVWULFWLRQVௐRUௐRWKHUௐ OLPLWDWLRQVௐWKDWௐDGYHUVHO\ௐDIIHFWௐFRYHUDJH"
3ULRUௐWRௐSXUFKDVHௐPHPEHUVௐVKRXOGௐEHௐDZDUHௐRIௐHDFKௐPDQXIDFWXUHU¶VௐUHVWULFWLRQVௐ6XFKௐDVௐ LPSURSHUௐXVHௐRIௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐPD\ௐUHVXOWௐLQௐGLVTXDOLILFDWLRQௐRIௐFRYHUDJHௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ2(0¶Vௐ ZDUUDQW\ௐ$QௐH[DPSOHௐRIௐWKLVௐPD\ௐEHௐDQௐ)ௐEHLQJௐXVHGௐIRUௐDௐSROLFHௐUHODWHGௐSXUVXLWௐZKLFKௐ PD\ௐYRLGௐFHUWDLQௐZDUUDQWLHVௐ$OWKRXJKௐZHௐDOZD\VௐZHOFRPHௐDQGௐHQFRXUDJHௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐ FRQWDFWௐXVௐIRUௐWKHLUௐSDUWLFXODUௐZDUUDQW\ௐFRYHUDJH


 'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐFRYHUௐWKHௐH[SHQVHௐRIௐWHFKQLFLDQV¶ௐWUDYHOௐ WLPHௐDQGௐPLOHDJHௐWRௐSHUIRUPௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUV"
,QௐVRPHௐFDVHVௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐZLOOௐWRZௐDௐPHPEHU¶VௐYHKLFOHௐWRௐWKHௐQHDUHVWௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUௐ IDFLOLW\ௐLQௐFDVHௐRIௐDௐEUHDNGRZQௐDQGௐFRYHUௐH[SHQVHVௐEXWௐSULRUௐDSSURYDOௐLVௐUHTXLUHG 

 $UHௐWKHUHௐDQ\ௐJHRJUDSKLFௐUHJLRQVௐRIௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐRUௐ &DQDGDௐ
DVௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐIRUௐZKLFKௐ\RXௐFDQQRWௐSURYLGHௐDௐ
FHUWLILHGௐWHFKQLFLDQௐWRௐSHUIRUPௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUV"ௐௐ+RZௐZLOOௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐLQௐWKHVHௐUHJLRQVௐEHௐSURYLGHGௐ VHUYLFHௐIRUௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLU"
7KLVௐPD\ௐYDU\ௐIURPௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐWRௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐ7KXVௐZHௐHQFRXUDJHௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐFDOOௐLQௐ SULRUௐWRௐSXUFKDVHௐDQGௐLQTXLUHௐDERXWௐWKHLUௐVSHFLILFௐUHJLRQௐDQGௐKRZௐWKHLUௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUVௐZLOOௐ EHௐFRYHUHGௐZLWKௐWKHLUௐPDQXIDFWXUHU 


:LOOௐ\RXௐFRYHUௐZDUUDQW\ௐVHUYLFHௐIRUௐLWHPVௐPDGHௐE\ௐRWKHUௐ PDQXIDFWXUHUVௐWKDWௐDUHௐSDUWௐRIௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDOௐRUௐDUHௐWKHVHௐ ZDUUDQWLHVௐLVVXHVௐW\SLFDOO\ௐSDVVHGௐRQௐWRௐWKHௐRULJLQDOௐ
HTXLSPHQWௐPDQXIDFWXUHU"
$OOௐZDUUDQWLHVௐDUHௐW\SLFDOO\ௐSDVVHGௐRQௐWRௐWKHௐRULJLQDOௐHTXLSPHQWௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐDQGௐDQ\ௐXSILWௐ ZDUUDQW\ௐZLOOௐEHௐSDVVHGௐRQௐWRௐWKHௐXSILWWHUௐWRௐSHUIRUP 

 :KDWௐDUHௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐH[FKDQJHௐDQGௐUHWXUQௐSURJUDPVௐDQGௐ SROLFLHV"
,IௐDௐPHPEHUௐFKDQJHVௐWKHLUௐPLQGௐ1$)*ௐZLOOௐTXLFNO\ௐPDNHௐHYHU\ௐHIIRUWௐWRௐFKDQJHௐRUௐFDQFHOௐ WKHௐRUGHUௐZLWKௐWKHௐIDFWRU\ௐ+RZHYHUௐRQFHௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐEHJLQVௐSURGXFLQJௐWKHௐYHKLFOHௐWKHUHௐ DUHௐQRௐFKDQJHVௐH[FKDQJHVௐRUௐUHIXQGVௐDYDLODEOHௐ7KHௐRUGHUௐLVௐWKHQௐGHHPHGௐQRQFDQFHOODEOHௐ 7KLVௐLQFOXGHVௐDQ\ௐXSILWௐHTXLSPHQWௐDQௐXSILWWHUௐKDVௐRUGHUHGௐIRUௐWKHௐXQLW 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHUYLFHௐFRQWUDFWௐRSWLRQVௐIRUௐWKHௐLWHPVௐLQFOXGHGௐ LQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDO
1$)*ௐRIIHUVௐDQ\ௐDQGௐDOOௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐVHUYLFHௐFRQWUDFWVௐIRUௐDOOௐPHPEHUVௐ7KHUHௐDUHௐVHYHUDOௐ SDUDPHWHUVௐLQௐZKLFKௐDௐVHUYLFHௐFRQWUDFWௐPD\ௐEHௐFXVWRPL]DEOHௐ7KHVHௐFXVWRPL]HGௐVHUYLFHௐ FRQWUDFWVௐZLOOௐEHௐWUHDWHGௐDVௐDGGௐIDFWRU\ௐRSWLRQVௐDQGௐIROORZLQJௐWKHௐVDPHௐGLVFRXQWௐVFKHGXOHௐ SURYLGHGௐLQௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐILOH


7DEOH
%
3HUIRUPDQFH6WDQGDUGVRU*XDUDQWHHV
'HVFULEHLQGHWDLO\RXUSHUIRUPDQFHVWDQGDUGVRUJXDUDQWHHVLQFOXGLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWVWRTXDOLI\FODLPVSURFHGXUHDQGRYHUDOOVWUXFWXUH<RXPD\ XSORDGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHVRI\RXUSHUIRUPDQFHPDWHULDOV LIDSSOLFDEOH
LQWKHGRFXPHQWXSORDGVHFWLRQRI\RXUUHVSRQVHLQDGGLWLRQWRUHVSRQGLQJWRWKH TXHVWLRQVEHORZ
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSHUIRUPDQFHௐVWDQGDUGVௐRUௐJXDUDQWHHVௐ
WKDWௐDSSO\ௐWRௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHV
7KHௐRQO\ௐJXDUDQWHHௐZHௐFDQௐHYHUௐSURYLGHௐLVௐWKHௐJXDUDQWHHௐWKDWௐZHௐZLOOௐWUHDWௐDQGௐKHOSௐHYHU\ௐPHPEHUௐ WKDWௐFRQWDFWVௐZLWKௐUHVSHFWௐLQWHJULW\ௐDQGௐSURIHVVLRQDOLVP 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHUYLFHௐVWDQGDUGVௐRUௐJXDUDQWHHVௐWKDWௐ
DSSO\ௐWRௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHVௐ
SROLFLHVௐPHWULFVௐ.3,VௐHWF

1$)*ௐDQGௐVWDIIௐXSKROGௐKLJKௐVWDQGDUGVௐZLWKௐKRZௐZHௐSURYLGHௐVHUYLFHௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐQRWௐRQO\ௐKROGLQJௐ HDFKௐRWKHUௐDFFRXQWDEOHௐEXWௐE\ௐHPEUDFLQJௐPHPEHUௐIHHGEDFNௐRIௐKRZௐZHௐFDQௐLPSURYHௐ7KHQௐZHௐDFWௐ XSRQௐLWௐDQGௐLPSOHPHQWௐLPSURYHPHQWV


7DEOH
3D\PHQW7HUPVDQG)LQDQFLQJ2SWLRQV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSD\PHQWௐWHUPVௐDQGௐDFFHSWHGௐSD\PHQWௐ
PHWKRGV"
6WDQGDUGௐSD\PHQWௐWHUPVௐDUHௐ1HWௐௐZLWKௐDௐௐ±ௐGD\ௐJUDFHௐSHULRG 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐOHDVLQJௐRUௐILQDQFLQJௐRSWLRQVௐDYDLODEOHௐIRUௐ XVHௐE\ௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐRUௐJRYHUQPHQWDOௐHQWLWLHV
ௐ,QௐRUGHUௐWRௐSURYLGHௐOHDVLQJௐRUௐILQDQFLQJௐRSWLRQVௐ1$)*ௐKDVௐSDUWQHUHGௐZLWKௐ1DWLRQDOௐ&RRSHUDWLYHௐ/HDVLQJௐWRௐ RIIHUௐOHDVLQJௐWHUPVௐIRUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐPHPEHUVௐIRUௐDOOௐ1$)*ௐTXRWHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐ)RUௐIXUWKHUௐ UHYLHZௐZHௐKDYHௐDWWDFKHGௐDௐ3')ௐFDOOHGௐ³1&/ௐ6DPSOHௐ/HDVH´ௐLQௐWKHௐ³0HPEHUௐ:DONௐ7KURXJK´ௐ=LSௐILOH 

 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVWDQGDUGௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐGRFXPHQWVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ SURSRVHௐWRௐXVHௐLQௐFRQQHFWLRQௐZLWKௐDQௐDZDUGHGௐFRQWUDFWௐ

RUGHUௐIRUPVௐWHUPVௐDQGௐFRQGLWLRQVௐVHUYLFHௐOHYHOௐ
DJUHHPHQWVௐHWF
ௐ8SORDGௐDௐVDPSOHௐRIௐHDFKௐ
DVௐ

DSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐ
UHVSRQVH
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXS¶VௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐSURFHVVௐ
3XUFKDVHௐ2UGHU
ௐLVௐFORVHO\ௐWUDFNHGௐZHOOௐGRFXPHQWHGௐDQGௐ
QHDWO\ௐRUJDQL]HGௐWRௐPRQLWRUௐHDFKௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐSHUIRUPHGௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐ7KLVௐZD\ௐ1$)*ௐPD\ௐ SURGXFHௐVZLIWௐDQGௐDFFXUDWHௐTXDUWHUO\ௐUHSRUWLQJ 

 'Rௐ\RXௐDFFHSWௐWKHௐ3FDUGௐSURFXUHPHQWௐDQGௐSD\PHQWௐ
SURFHVV"ௐ,IௐVRௐLVௐWKHUHௐDQ\ௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWௐWRௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐIRUௐXVLQJௐWKLVௐSURFHVV" <HVௐ1$)*ௐDFFHSWVௐXSௐWRௐௐSHUௐYHKLFOHௐ+RZHYHUௐDQ\ௐGROODUௐDPRXQWௐKLJKHUௐWKDQௐௐZLOOௐUHTXLUHௐDௐ3 FDUGௐ&UHGLWௐ&DUGௐWUDQVDFWLRQDOௐIHHௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐEHௐSDVVHGௐRQWRௐWKHௐPHPEHU 

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
344
7DEOH
3ULFLQJDQG'HOLYHU\
3URYLGHGHWDLOHGSULFLQJLQIRUPDWLRQLQWKHTXHVWLRQVWKDWIROORZEHORZ.HHSLQPLQGWKDWUHDVRQDEOHSULFHDQGSURGXFWDGMXVWPHQWVFDQEHPDGHGXULQJWKHWHUPRI DQDZDUGHG&RQWUDFWDVGHVFULEHGLQWKH5)3WKHWHPSODWH&RQWUDFWDQGWKH6RXUFHZHOO3ULFHDQG3URGXFW&KDQJH5HTXHVW)RUP /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSULFLQJௐPRGHOௐ
HJௐOLQHLWHPௐGLVFRXQWVௐRUௐSURGXFWFDWHJRU\ௐ

GLVFRXQWV
ௐ3URYLGHௐGHWDLOHGௐSULFLQJௐGDWDௐ
LQFOXGLQJௐVWDQGDUGௐRUௐOLVWௐ
SULFLQJௐDQGௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQWHGௐSULFH
ௐRQௐDOOௐRIௐWKHௐLWHPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ
ZDQWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐWRௐFRQVLGHUௐDVௐSDUWௐRIௐ\RXUௐ5)3ௐUHVSRQVHௐ,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐ SURYLGHௐDௐ6.8ௐIRUௐHDFKௐLWHPௐLQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDOௐ8SORDGௐ\RXUௐSULFLQJௐ PDWHULDOVௐ
LIௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐLVௐRIIHULQJௐ/LQH,WHPௐ'LVFRXQWVௐ2IIௐ0DQXIDFWXUHௐ 6XJJHVWHGௐ5HWDLOௐ3ULFHௐIRUௐௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐWKDWௐLVௐGHWDLOHGௐLQௐWKHௐ3ULFHௐ)LOHௐ 1$)*ௐZLOOௐDOVRௐRIIHUௐDQ\ௐ8SILWVௐWRௐEHௐDGGHGௐWRௐDQ\ௐDQGௐDOOௐYHKLFOHV¶ௐWKDWௐPHPEHUVௐ ZLVKௐWRௐDGGௐ'HWDLOVௐDUHௐORFDWHGௐRQௐWKHௐ3ULFHௐ6XPPDU\ௐ3DJHௐLQௐWKHௐ3ULFHௐ)LOH 


4XDQWLI\ௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐGLVFRXQWௐUHSUHVHQWHGௐE\ௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐSURSRVDOௐLQௐWKLVௐ UHVSRQVHௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐLIௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐLQௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐGLVFRXQWௐIURPௐ0653ௐRUௐOLVWௐVWDWHௐWKHௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRUௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐUDQJH
1$)*ௐKDVௐDQௐSURYLGHGௐRIIHULQJVௐIURPௐௐ%UDQGV2(06ௐDQGௐWKHUHௐUHVSHFWLYHௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐRIIௐYDU\ௐDQGௐDUHௐGHWDLOHGௐLQௐWKHௐ3ULFHௐ)LOHௐ]LSௐ (DFKௐ0DQXIDFWXUHௐ5DQJHௐLVௐGHWDLOHGௐLQௐWKHௐWDEVௐEHORZௐKHUHௐLVௐDQௐ RYHUYLHZௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
&KHYUROHWௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
)RUGௐ0RWRUௐ&RPSDQ\ௐIURPௐ
ௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
*0&ௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
5DPௐIURPௐ

ௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
'RGJHௐIURPௐ
ௐWRௐ

ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
-HHSௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
&KU\VOHUௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
7R\RWDௐIURPௐௐWRௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
+RQGDௐIURPௐௐWRௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
1LVVDQௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
%XLFNௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
.LDௐIURPௐ
ௐWRௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
%0:ௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
&DGLOODFௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
9RONVZDJHQௐIURPௐௐWRௐௐ


 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐTXDQWLW\ௐRUௐYROXPHௐGLVFRXQWVௐRUௐUHEDWHௐSURJUDPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ RIIHU
,IௐFOLHQWVௐDUHௐFRQVLGHULQJௐDQௐRUGHUௐRIௐௐRUௐPRUHௐXQLWVௐZHௐHQFRXUDJHௐPHPEHUVௐ WRௐFRQWDFWௐXVௐIRUௐDQ\ௐDGGLWLRQDOௐGLVFRXQWHGௐTXRWHV 

 3URSRVHௐDௐPHWKRGௐRIௐIDFLOLWDWLQJௐ³VRXUFHG´ௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐUHODWHGௐVHUYLFHVௐ ZKLFKௐPD\ௐEHௐUHIHUUHGௐWRௐDVௐ³RSHQௐPDUNHW´ௐLWHPVௐRUௐ³QRQVWDQGDUG RSWLRQV´ௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐ\RXௐPD\ௐVXSSO\ௐVXFKௐLWHPVௐ³DWௐFRVW´ௐRUௐ³DWௐFRVWௐ SOXVௐDௐSHUFHQWDJH´ௐRUௐ\RXௐPD\ௐVXSSO\ௐDௐTXRWHௐIRUௐHDFKௐVXFKௐUHTXHVW ³2SHQௐ0DUNHW´ௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐ³6RXUFHGௐ*RRGV´ௐZLOOௐEHௐFRQVLGHUHGௐDQGௐWUHDWHGௐDVௐ UHJXODUௐXSILWVௐ+RZHYHUௐWKH\ௐPD\ௐEHௐTXRWHGௐXSௐWRௐDௐௐPDUNௐXSௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOH 

 ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐHOHPHQWௐRIௐWKHௐWRWDOௐFRVWௐRIௐDFTXLVLWLRQௐWKDWௐLVௐ127ௐLQFOXGHGௐ LQௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐVXEPLWWHGௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHௐ7KLVௐLQFOXGHVௐDOOௐDGGLWLRQDOௐ FKDUJHVௐDVVRFLDWHGௐZLWKௐDௐSXUFKDVHௐWKDWௐDUHௐQRWௐGLUHFWO\ௐLGHQWLILHGௐDVௐ IUHLJKWௐRUௐVKLSSLQJௐFKDUJHVௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐOLVWௐFRVWVௐIRUௐLWHPVௐOLNHௐSUH GHOLYHU\ௐLQVSHFWLRQௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐVHWௐXSௐPDQGDWRU\ௐWUDLQLQJௐRUௐLQLWLDOௐ LQVSHFWLRQௐ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐSDUWLHVௐWKDWௐLPSRVHௐVXFKௐFRVWVௐDQGௐWKHLUௐ UHODWLRQVKLSௐWRௐWKHௐ3URSRVHU
$OOௐFRQVLGHUDWLRQVௐKDYHௐDOUHDG\ௐEHHQௐWDNHQௐLQWRௐDFFRXQWௐLQௐLWVௐHQWLUHO\ௐ7KHௐ3ULFHௐ 6XPPDU\ௐ3DJHௐDQGௐ3ULFHௐ7DEOHௐFRQWDLQHGௐLQௐWKHௐSULFHௐILOHௐLQFOXGHVௐDOOௐFRQVLGHUHGௐ FRVWVௐ$OWKRXJKௐLIௐDௐPHPEHUௐUHTXHVWHGௐDௐVSHFLDOL]HGௐTXRWHௐIRUௐDௐXQLTXHௐVLWXDWLRQௐ WKDWௐUHTXLUHVௐVSHFLDOௐWUDLQLQJௐGLUHFWLRQௐRUௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐWKHௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWVௐZRXOGௐEHௐ DGGHGௐDVௐDௐSDUWௐRIௐWKHௐXSILWௐDQGௐWKHQௐLQFOXGHGௐLQVLGHௐWKHௐPHPEHU¶VௐTXRWH 

 ,IௐIUHLJKWௐGHOLYHU\ௐRUௐVKLSSLQJௐLVௐDQௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWௐWRௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ SDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLW\ௐGHVFULEHௐLQௐGHWDLOௐWKHௐFRPSOHWHௐIUHLJKWௐVKLSSLQJௐDQGௐ GHOLYHU\ௐSURJUDP
$OOௐPDQXIDFWXUHVௐFKDUJHௐDௐVWDQGDUGௐ³)DFWRU\ௐ'HVWLQDWLRQௐ&KDUJH´ௐ+RZHYHUௐWKDWௐLVௐ VHSDUDWHௐIURPௐWKHௐIUHLJKWGHVWLQDWLRQௐFRVWௐWKDWௐPHPEHUVௐPD\ௐLQFXUௐWRௐVKLSௐDௐYHKLFOHௐ WRௐDQGௐIURPௐDQௐLQVWDOOHUௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOHௐ7KHVHௐVXEVHTXHQWௐORFDWLRQDOௐPRYHPHQWVௐPD\ௐ EDUHௐDGGLWLRQDOௐIUHLJKWௐFRVWVௐWKDWௐZLOOௐEHௐRXWOLQHGௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐTXRWHௐIRUௐ WKHLUௐUHYLHZௐSULRUௐWRௐSXUFKDVH


 6SHFLILFDOO\ௐGHVFULEHௐIUHLJKWௐVKLSSLQJௐDQGௐGHOLYHU\ௐWHUPVௐRUௐSURJUDPVௐ DYDLODEOHௐIRUௐ$ODVNDௐ+DZDLLௐ&DQDGDௐRUௐDQ\ௐRIIVKRUHௐGHOLYHU\ )UHLJKWௐVKLSSLQJௐDQGௐGHOLYHU\ௐWHUPVௐDPRQJௐWKHVHௐUHJLRQVௐVRPHWLPHVௐFDUU\ௐ DGGLWLRQDOௐORJLVWLFDOௐFKDUJHVௐIRUௐDGGHGௐIHUU\ௐSRUWௐDQGௐGULYHUௐFRVWVௐIURPௐERWKௐWRௐDQGௐ IURPௐWKHௐPDLQODQGௐ7KHVHௐDGGHGௐFRVWVௐZLOOௐEHௐGLVFORVHGௐRQௐWKHௐTXRWHௐIRUௐ PHPEHUVௐWRௐUHYLHZௐDQGௐDSSURYHௐSULRUௐWRௐSXUFKDVH


 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐXQLTXHௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐDQGRUௐGHOLYHU\ௐPHWKRGVௐRUௐRSWLRQVௐ RIIHUHGௐLQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDO
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐDOUHDG\ௐKDVௐDௐZHOOHVWDEOLVKHGௐ$XWRPRELOHௐ)UDQFKLVHௐ 'LVWULEXWLRQௐ1HWZRUNௐWKDWௐDOORZVௐIRUௐVZLIWௐDQGௐUHODWLYHO\ௐVHDPOHVVௐGHOLYHU\ௐWRௐ PHPEHUVௐDQGௐWKHLUௐHQGௐXVHUV


7DEOH
3ULFLQJ2IIHUHG
/LQH
,WHP 7KH3ULFLQJ2IIHUHGLQWKLV3URSRVDOLV

&RPPHQWV
 FEHWWHUWKDQWKH3URSRVHUW\SLFDOO\RIIHUVWR*32VFRRSHUDWLYHSURFXUHPHQWRUJDQL]DWLRQVRUVWDWHSXUFKDVLQJGHSDUWPHQWV 1$)*ௐ6WULYHVௐWRௐRIIHUௐWKHௐEHVWௐ RYHUDOOௐYDOXHௐWRௐWKHௐPHPEHUௐZLWKௐ
HDFKௐDQGௐHYHU\ௐTXRWH
Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
345
7DEOH
$XGLWDQG$GPLQLVWUDWLYH)HH
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 6SHFLILFDOO\ௐGHVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHOIDXGLWௐSURFHVVௐRUௐSURJUDPௐWKDWௐ\RXௐSODQௐWRௐHPSOR\ௐ WRௐYHULI\ௐFRPSOLDQFHௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐ&RQWUDFWௐZLWKௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ7KLVௐSURFHVVௐ LQFOXGHVௐHQVXULQJௐWKDWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐREWDLQௐWKHௐSURSHUௐSULFLQJௐ WKDWௐWKHௐ9HQGRUௐUHSRUWVௐDOOௐVDOHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ&RQWUDFWௐHDFKௐTXDUWHUௐDQGௐWKDWௐWKHௐ 9HQGRUௐUHPLWVௐWKHௐSURSHUௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ3URYLGHௐVXIILFLHQWௐGHWDLOௐ WRௐVXSSRUWௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐUHSRUWௐTXDUWHUO\ௐVDOHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐDVௐGHVFULEHGௐLQௐWKHௐ &RQWUDFWௐWHPSODWH
6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐPHPEHUVௐDUHௐDEOHௐWRௐREWDLQௐSURSHUௐSULFLQJௐGLUHFWO\ௐ IURPௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐZKHUHௐWKH\ௐDUHௐDEOHௐWRௐXVHௐRXUௐXVHUIULHQGO\ௐGHVLJQௐWRௐ EXLOGௐDQGௐSULFHௐWKHLUௐYHKLFOHVௐ7KHௐ1$)*ௐLVௐXSGDWHGௐGDLO\ௐWRௐUHIOHFWௐ XSGDWHGௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐ0653ௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐ2XUௐV\VWHPௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐPHPEHUVௐ ZLWKௐDQௐDFFXUDWHௐTXRWHௐ



ௐRIௐWKHௐWLPHௐ,QௐDGGLWLRQௐ1$)*ௐKDVௐDௐ
VWUHDPௐOLQHௐDQGௐRUJDQL]HGௐSURFHVVௐKDWௐFDOFXODWHVௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHVௐDQGௐ DOORZVௐ1$)*ௐWRௐJLYHௐDௐWXUQDURXQGௐWLPHௐRIௐௐ±ௐௐGD\VௐIRUௐTXDUWHUO\ௐ UHSRUWV


 ,Iௐ\RXௐDUHௐDZDUGHGௐDௐFRQWUDFWௐSURYLGHௐDௐIHZௐH[DPSOHVௐRIௐLQWHUQDOௐPHWULFVௐWKDWௐ ZLOOௐEHௐWUDFNHGௐWRௐPHDVXUHௐZKHWKHUௐ\RXௐDUHௐKDYLQJௐVXFFHVVௐZLWKௐWKHௐFRQWUDFW 2QHௐRIௐWKHௐLQWHUQDOௐPHWULFVௐ1$)*ௐXVHVௐWRௐWUDFNௐDQGௐPHDVXUHௐVXFFHVVௐ ZLWKௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐLVௐPDLQWDLQHGௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐ2XUௐ ZHEVLWHௐNHHSVௐDௐGHWDLOHGௐORJௐRIௐTXRWHVௐWKDWௐPHPEHUVௐDUHௐJHQHUDWLQJௐ:Hௐ RYHUVHHௐDQGௐNHHSௐWUDFNௐRIௐKRZௐPDQ\ௐTXRWHVௐDUHௐEHLQJௐJHQHUDWHGௐDQGௐ ZKLFKௐTXRWHVௐDUHௐPHWௐZLWKௐDௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐ(YHU\ௐPRQWKௐZHௐHYDOXDWHௐRXUௐ VDOHVௐLQGLFDWRUVௐDQGௐFORVHO\ௐPRQLWRUௐWKHௐYROXPHௐDQGௐIUHTXHQF\ௐRIௐVDOHVௐ 2QHௐH[DPSOHௐLVௐE\ௐHYDOXDWLQJௐZKLFKௐPHPEHUVௐDUHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐIURPௐRXUௐ SODWIRUPௐ±ௐQHZௐPHPEHUVௐRUௐIUHTXHQWௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐHQVXUHௐZHௐDUHௐJURZLQJௐ RXUௐPHPEHUௐEDVHௐ:HௐXVHௐWKHVHௐPHWULFVௐWRௐPHDVXUHௐRXUௐSURMHFWHGௐJURZWKௐ UDWHௐDQGௐZRUNௐWRௐH[FHHGௐRXUௐH[SHFWDWLRQV



,GHQWLI\ௐDௐSURSRVHGௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐWKDWௐ\RXௐZLOOௐSD\ௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐIRUௐ IDFLOLWDWLQJௐPDQDJLQJௐDQGௐSURPRWLQJௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐLQௐWKHௐHYHQWௐWKDWௐ \RXௐDUHௐDZDUGHGௐDௐ&RQWUDFWௐௐ7KLVௐIHHௐLVௐW\SLFDOO\ௐFDOFXODWHGௐDVௐDௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ 9HQGRU¶VௐVDOHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ&RQWUDFWௐRUௐDVௐDௐSHUXQLWௐIHH
ௐLWௐLVௐQRWௐDௐOLQHLWHPௐ
DGGLWLRQௐWRௐWKHௐ0HPEHU¶VௐFRVWௐRIௐJRRGVௐ
6HHௐWKHௐ5)3ௐDQGௐWHPSODWHௐ&RQWUDFWௐIRUௐ
DGGLWLRQDOௐGHWDLOV

1$)*ௐZLOOௐVXEPLWௐௐௐSHUௐYHKLFOHௐSXUFKDVHGௐWKURXJKௐ1$)*ௐDQGௐௐௐ SHUௐYHKLFOHௐSXUFKDVHGௐWKRXJKௐRXUௐSDUWQHUௐGHDOHUௐ$ODQௐ-D\ௐ$XWRPRWLYHௐ)RUௐ WKHௐSXUSRVHௐRIௐDQௐDGPLQௐIHHௐWKHUHௐDUHௐQRௐRWKHUௐSDUWQHUௐGHDOHUௐJURXSVௐ FRQVLGHUHG 

7DEOH$
'HSWKDQG%UHDGWKRI2IIHUHG(TXLSPHQW3URGXFWVDQG6HUYLFHV /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 3URYLGHௐDௐGHWDLOHGௐGHVFULSWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐHTXLSPHQWௐ
SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐDUHௐRIIHULQJௐLQௐ\RXUௐ
SURSRVDO
1$)*ௐKDVௐSURYLGHGௐDௐ³0RGHOௐ5ROOௐ2XW´ௐ&KDUWVௐLQௐWKHௐ³3ULFHௐ)LOH´ௐ]LSௐEXWௐRIௐWKHௐௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐZHௐ UHSUHVHQWௐWKH\ௐKDYHௐRYHUௐௐPDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOVௐIRUௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐFKRRVHௐIURPௐWKDWௐUDQJHௐIURPௐ&ODVVௐ ௐDQGௐVXSSRUWLQJௐ&ODVVௐௐ&DEௐDQGௐ&KDVVLVௐWUXFNVௐ1$)*¶VௐSODWIRUPVௐFDQௐDGGௐDQ\ௐXSILWௐRIௐWKHLUௐ FKRRVLQJௐUDQJLQJௐIURPௐWRROER[HVௐWRௐ/LQHௐ0HFKDQLFௐ%RGLHVௐ$Q\ௐDQGௐDOOௐXSILWVௐFDQௐEHௐDGGHGௐWRௐDQ\ௐ RQHௐRIௐRXUௐYHKLFOHVௐWKURXJKௐRQHௐRIௐRXUௐXSILWௐSDUWQHUௐVXSSOLHUVௐRUௐE\ௐDQௐXSILWௐVXSSOLHUௐRIௐWKHௐPHPEHUVௐ FKRRVLQJௐ1$)*ௐDQGௐWKHௐVXSSOLHUௐZLOOௐZRUNௐWRJHWKHUௐWRௐVXSSO\ௐPHPEHUVௐZLWKௐWXUQNH\ௐTXRWHV 

 :LWKLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐFDWHJRU\ௐWKHUHௐPD\ௐEHௐVXEFDWHJRULHVௐ RIௐVROXWLRQVௐ/LVWௐVXEFDWHJRU\ௐWLWOHVௐWKDWௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHௐ \RXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHV
1DWLRQDOௐ$XWRௐ)OHHWௐ*URXSௐOLVWVௐWKHௐPDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOVௐRIௐDOOௐௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐZHௐUHSUHVHQWௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ =,3ௐ)LOHௐ³$OOௐௐ0DQXIDFWXUHV´ௐௐ7KHVHௐௐ2(0VௐPDNHௐXSௐRYHUௐௐFRPELQHGௐPDNHVௐPRGHOVௐDQGௐ HQJLQHௐFRPELQDWLRQVௐIRUௐPHPEHUVௐWRௐVHOHFWௐIURPௐDORQJௐZLWKௐVHYHUDOௐVXEWLWOHௐ³8SILWV´ௐGHWDLOHGௐIRUௐ PHPEHUVௐLQௐWKHௐSULFHௐILOH


7DEOH%
'HSWKDQG%UHDGWKRI2IIHUHG(TXLSPHQW3URGXFWVDQG6HUYLFHV ,QGLFDWHEHORZLIWKHOLVWHGW\SHVRUFODVVHVRIHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVDUHRIIHUHGZLWKLQ\RXUSURSRVDO3URYLGHDGGLWLRQDOFRPPHQWVLQWKHWH[WER[ SURYLGHGDVQHFHVVDU\
/LQH,WHP &DWHJRU\RU7\SH 2IIHUHG
&RPPHQWV
 $XWRPRELOHV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 6SRUWௐ8WLOLW\ௐ9HKLFOHV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 9DQV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 7UXFNV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 9HKLFOHVௐGHVFULEHGௐLQௐ/LQHVௐௐDERYHௐIRUௐ3XEOLFௐ6DIHW\ௐ

DSSOLFDWLRQV
<HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 &RQYHQWLRQDOௐLQWHUQDOௐFRPEXVWLRQௐPRGHOV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
 1DWXUDOௐJDVௐRUௐSURSDQHௐDXWRJDVௐK\EULGௐRUௐDOWHUQDWLYHௐIXHOௐ PRGHOV
<HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV

(OHFWULFௐSRZHUHGௐPRGHOV <HV
1R
ௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐWRWDOLQJௐZHOOௐDERYHௐௐ
PDNHVௐDQGௐPRGHOV
Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
346
7DEOH
([FHSWLRQVWR7HUPV&RQGLWLRQVRU6SHFLILFDWLRQV)RUP /LQH,WHP127,&(
7RLGHQWLI\DQ\H[FHSWLRQRUWRUHTXHVWDQ\PRGLILFDWLRQWRWKH6RXUFHZHOOWHPSODWH&RQWUDFWWHUPVFRQGLWLRQVRUVSHFLILFDWLRQVD 3URSRVHUPXVWVXEPLWWKHH[FHSWLRQRUUHTXHVWHGPRGLILFDWLRQRQWKH([FHSWLRQVWR7HUPV&RQGLWLRQVRU6SHFLILFDWLRQV)RUPLPPHGLDWHO\EHORZ7KHFRQWUDFW VHFWLRQWKHVSHFLILFWH[WDGGUHVVHGE\WKHH[FHSWLRQRUUHTXHVWHGPRGLILFDWLRQDQGWKHSURSRVHGPRGLILFDWLRQPXVWEHLGHQWLILHGLQGHWDLO3URSRVHU VH[FHSWLRQVDQG
SURSRVHGPRGLILFDWLRQVDUHVXEMHFWWRUHYLHZDQGDSSURYDORI6RXUFHZHOODQGZLOOQRWDXWRPDWLFDOO\EHLQFOXGHGLQWKHFRQWUDFW &RQWUDFW6HFWLRQ 7HUP&RQGLWLRQRU6SHFLILFDWLRQ ([FHSWLRQRU3URSRVHG0RGLILFDWLRQ  
'RFXPHQWV
(QVXUH\RXUVXEPLVVLRQGRFXPHQW
V
FRQIRUPVWRWKHIROORZLQJ

'RFXPHQWVLQ3')IRUPDWDUHSUHIHUUHG'RFXPHQWVLQ:RUG([FHORUFRPSDWLEOHIRUPDWVPD\DOVREHSURYLGHG 'RFXPHQWVVKRXOG127KDYHDVHFXULW\SDVVZRUGDV6RXUFHZHOOPD\QRWEHDEOHWRRSHQWKHILOH,WLV\RXUVROHUHVSRQVLELOLW\WRHQVXUHWKDWWKHXSORDGHG

GRFXPHQW
V
DUHQRWHLWKHUGHIHFWLYHFRUUXSWHGRUEODQNDQGWKDWWKHGRFXPHQWVFDQEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHGE\6RXUFHZHOO 6RXUFHZHOOPD\UHMHFWDQ\UHVSRQVHZKHUHDQ\GRFXPHQW V
FDQQRWEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHGE\6RXUFHZHOO
,I\RXQHHGWRXSORDGPRUHWKDQRQH

GRFXPHQWIRUDVLQJOHLWHP\RXVKRXOGFRPELQHWKHGRFXPHQWVLQWRRQH]LSSHGILOH,IWKH]LSSHGILOHFRQWDLQVPRUHWKDQ RQH

GRFXPHQWHQVXUHHDFKGRFXPHQWLVQDPHGLQUHODWLRQWRWKHVXEPLVVLRQIRUPDWLWHPUHVSRQGLQJWR)RUH[DPSOHLIUHVSRQGLQJWRWKH0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ FDWHJRU\VDYHWKHGRFXPHQWDV³0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ´
3ULFLQJ1$)*3ULFH)LOHIRU%LG
]LS0RQGD\6HSWHPEHU




)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWKDQG6WDELOLW\0DUNHW6XFFHVVDQG)LQDQFLDO6WDELOLW\]LS0RQGD\6HSWHPEHU



0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ6DPSOHV0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ&RPSUHVVHG]LS7XHVGD\6HSWHPEHU 

:0%(0%(6%(RU5HODWHG&HUWLILFDWHV,QVXUDQFHDQG5HODWHG'RFXPHQWV]LS7XHVGD\6HSWHPEHU 

:DUUDQW\,QIRUPDWLRQ:DUUDQWLHV5)3
]LS7XHVGD\6HSWHPEHU


6WDQGDUG7UDQVDFWLRQ'RFXPHQW6DPSOHV6WDQGDUG7UDQVDFWLRQ]LS0RQGD\6HSWHPEHU



8SORDG$GGLWLRQDO'RFXPHQW$//0DNHVDQG8SILWV]LS7XHVGD\6HSWHPEHU 

Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
347
$GGHQGD7HUPVDQG&RQGLWLRQV
352326(5$)),'$9,7$1'$6685$1&(2)&203/,$1&(
,FHUWLI\WKDW,DPWKHDXWKRUL]HGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIWKH3URSRVHUVXEPLWWLQJWKHIRUHJRLQJ3URSRVDOZLWKWKHOHJDODXWKRULW\WRELQGWKH3URSRVHUWRWKLV$IILGDYLWDQG $VVXUDQFHRI&RPSOLDQFH

 7KH3URSRVHULVVXEPLWWLQJWKLV3URSRVDOXQGHULWVIXOODQGFRPSOHWHOHJDOQDPHDQGWKH3URSRVHUOHJDOO\H[LVWVLQJRRGVWDQGLQJLQWKHMXULVGLFWLRQRILWV UHVLGHQFH
 7KH3URSRVHUZDUUDQWVWKDWWKHLQIRUPDWLRQSURYLGHGLQWKLV3URSRVDOLVWUXHFRUUHFWDQGUHOLDEOHIRUSXUSRVHVRIHYDOXDWLRQIRUFRQWUDFWDZDUG  7KH3URSRVHULQFOXGLQJDQ\SHUVRQDVVLVWLQJZLWKWKHFUHDWLRQRIWKLV3URSRVDOKDVDUULYHGDWWKLV3URSRVDOLQGHSHQGHQWO\DQGWKH3URSRVDOKDVEHHQFUHDWHG ZLWKRXWFROOXGLQJZLWKDQ\RWKHUSHUVRQFRPSDQ\RUSDUWLHVWKDWKDYHRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOXQGHUWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ DQGWKH3URSRVDOKDVLQDOOUHVSHFWVEHHQ
FUHDWHGIDLUO\ZLWKRXWDQ\IUDXGRUGLVKRQHVW\7KH3URSRVHUKDVQRWGLUHFWO\RULQGLUHFWO\HQWHUHGLQWRDQ\DJUHHPHQWRUDUUDQJHPHQWZLWKDQ\SHUVRQRU EXVLQHVVLQDQHIIRUWWRLQIOXHQFHDQ\SDUWRIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQRURSHUDWLRQVRIDUHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW DQGWKH3URSRVHUKDVQRWWDNHQDQ\DFWLRQLQUHVWUDLQWRIIUHH WUDGHRUFRPSHWLWLYHQHVVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ$GGLWLRQDOO\LI3URSRVHUKDVZRUNHGZLWKDFRQVXOWDQWRQWKH3URSRVDOWKHFRQVXOWDQW DQLQGLYLGXDO
RUDFRPSDQ\
KDVQRWDVVLVWHGDQ\RWKHUHQWLW\WKDWKDVVXEPLWWHGRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOIRUWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ  7RWKHEHVWRILWVNQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIDQGH[FHSWDVRWKHUZLVHGLVFORVHGLQWKH3URSRVDOWKHUHDUHQRUHOHYDQWIDFWVRUFLUFXPVWDQFHVZKLFKFRXOGJLYHULVHWR DQRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVW$QRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVWH[LVWVZKHQDYHQGRUKDVDQXQIDLUFRPSHWLWLYHDGYDQWDJHRUWKHYHQGRU¶VREMHFWLYLW\ LQSHUIRUPLQJWKHFRQWUDFWLVRUPLJKWEHLPSDLUHG
 7KHFRQWHQWVRIWKH3URSRVDOKDYHQRWEHHQFRPPXQLFDWHGE\WKH3URSRVHURULWVHPSOR\HHVRUDJHQWVWRDQ\SHUVRQQRWDQHPSOR\HHRUOHJDOO\DXWKRUL]HG DJHQWRIWKH3URSRVHUDQGZLOOQRWEHFRPPXQLFDWHGWRDQ\VXFKSHUVRQVSULRUWR'XH'DWHRIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ  ,IDZDUGHGDFRQWUDFWWKH3URSRVHUZLOOSURYLGHWR6RXUFHZHOO3DUWLFLSDWLQJ(QWLWLHVWKHHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHWHUPV FRQGLWLRQVDQGVFRSHRIDUHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW
 7KH3URSRVHUSRVVHVVHVRUZLOOSRVVHVVEHIRUHGHOLYHULQJDQ\HTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVDOODSSOLFDEOHOLFHQVHVRUFHUWLILFDWLRQVQHFHVVDU\WRGHOLYHU VXFKHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVXQGHUDQ\UHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW  7KH3URSRVHUDJUHHVWRGHOLYHUHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVWKURXJKYDOLGFRQWUDFWVSXUFKDVHRUGHUVRUPHDQVWKDWDUHDFFHSWDEOHWR6RXUFHZHOO 0HPEHUV8QOHVVRWKHUZLVHDJUHHGWRWKH3URSRVHUPXVWSURYLGHRQO\QHZDQGILUVWTXDOLW\SURGXFWVDQGUHODWHGVHUYLFHVWR6RXUFHZHOO0HPEHUVXQGHUDQ DZDUGHG&RQWUDFW

 7KH3URSRVHUZLOOFRPSO\ZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOHSURYLVLRQVRIIHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOODZVUHJXODWLRQVUXOHVDQGRUGHUV  7KH3URSRVHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKDW6RXUFHZHOOZLOOUHMHFW5)3SURSRVDOVWKDWDUHPDUNHGFRQILGHQWLDO RUQRQSXEOLFHWF
HLWKHUVXEVWDQWLDOO\RULQWKHLUHQWLUHW\
8QGHU0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV6HFWLRQ
VXEGLYLVLRQDOOSURSRVDOVDUHFRQVLGHUHGQRQSXEOLFGDWDXQWLOWKHHYDOXDWLRQLVFRPSOHWHDQGD&RQWUDFWLV DZDUGHG$WWKDWSRLQWSURSRVDOVEHFRPHSXEOLFGDWD0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV6HFWLRQSHUPLWVRQO\FHUWDLQQDUURZO\GHILQHGGDWDWREHFRQVLGHUHGDWUDGH VHFUHWDQGWKXVQRQSXEOLFGDWDXQGHU0LQQHVRWD
V'DWD3UDFWLFHV$FW
 3URSRVHULWVHPSOR\HHVDJHQWVDQGVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDUHQRW

 ,QFOXGHGRQWKH³6SHFLDOO\'HVLJQDWHG1DWLRQDOVDQG%ORFNHG3HUVRQV´OLVWPDLQWDLQHGE\WKH2IILFHRI)RUHLJQ$VVHWV&RQWURORIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV 'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH7UHDVXU\IRXQGDW
KWWSV
ZZZWUHDVXU\JRYRIDFGRZQORDGVVGQOLVWSGI

 ,QFOXGHGRQWKHJRYHUQPHQWZLGHH[FOXVLRQVOLVWVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV6\VWHPIRU$ZDUG0DQDJHPHQWIRXQGDW KWWSV
VDPJRY6$0
RU
 3UHVHQWO\GHEDUUHGVXVSHQGHGSURSRVHGIRUGHEDUPHQWGHFODUHGLQHOLJLEOHRUYROXQWDULO\H[FOXGHGIURPSURJUDPVRSHUDWHGE\WKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD

WKH8QLWHG6WDWHVIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWRUWKH&DQDGLDQJRYHUQPHQWDVDSSOLFDEOH RUDQ\3DUWLFLSDWLQJ(QWLW\9HQGRUFHUWLILHVDQGZDUUDQWVWKDWQHLWKHULW QRULWVSULQFLSDOVKDYHEHHQFRQYLFWHGRIDFULPLQDORIIHQVHUHODWHGWRWKHVXEMHFWPDWWHURIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ %\FKHFNLQJWKLVER[,DFNQRZOHGJHWKDW,DPERXQGE\WKHWHUPVRIWKH3URSRVHU¶V$IILGDYLWKDYHWKHOHJDODXWKRULW\WRVXEPLWWKLV3URSRVDORQEHKDOIRIWKH 3URSRVHUDQGWKDWWKLVHOHFWURQLFDFNQRZOHGJPHQWKDVWKHVDPHOHJDOHIIHFWYDOLGLW\DQGHQIRUFHDELOLW\DVLI,KDGKDQGVLJQHGWKH3URSRVDO7KLVVLJQDWXUHZLOOQRW EHGHQLHGVXFKOHJDOHIIHFWYDOLGLW\RUHQIRUFHDELOLW\VROHO\EHFDXVHDQHOHFWURQLFVLJQDWXUHRUHOHFWURQLFUHFRUGZDVXVHGLQLWVIRUPDWLRQ-HVVH&RRSHU)OHHW 0DQDJHU+RXU//&
7KH3URSRVHUGHFODUHVWKDWWKHUHLVDQDFWXDORUSRWHQWLDO&RQIOLFWRI,QWHUHVWUHODWLQJWRWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRILWVVXEPLVVLRQDQGRUWKH3URSRVHUIRUHVHHVDQDFWXDORU SRWHQWLDO&RQIOLFWRI,QWHUHVWLQSHUIRUPLQJWKHFRQWUDFWXDOREOLJDWLRQVFRQWHPSODWHGLQWKHELG <HV 1R
7KH%LGGHUDFNQRZOHGJHVDQGDJUHHVWKDWWKHDGGHQGXPDGGHQGDEHORZIRUPSDUWRIWKH%LG'RFXPHQW Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
348
&KHFNWKHER[LQWKHFROXPQ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKLVDGGHQGXPEHORZWRDFNQRZOHGJHHDFKRIWKHDGGHQGD )LOH1DPH
,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKH
EHORZDGGHQGXPDQG
DWWDFKPHQWV
LI

DSSOLFDEOH

3DJHV
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

:HG6HSWHPEHU
30 
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

7XH6HSWHPEHU
30 
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

7KX$XJXVW
30 
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

0RQ$XJXVW

$0 
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

6XQ$XJXVW

30 
$GGHQGXPBB$XWRVB689VB9DQVB7UXFNVB5)3B

7KX$XJXVW
30 
Bid Number: RFP 091521 Vendor Name: 72 HOUR LLC




 






ATTACHMENT 1
349
One Unit
(MSRP)
One Unit Total %
Savings
Extended
Unit's (7)
Total Savings
Contract Price $56,370.00 $54,996.73 2.436 % $384,977.11 $9,612.89 Black and White $1,350.00 $9,450.00
Paint
Tax (10.2500 %) $5,775.54 $40,428.78
Tire fee $8.75 $61.25
Transportation $450.00 $3,150.00
Total $62,581.02 $438,067.14
Additional options not included in price above:
5 Year / 100,000 mi Extended
Warranty (Per Unit) $3,070.00
Yesenia Covarrubias / Joshua Jerome
Fleet Department
Account Manager
[email protected]
(626) 457-5590
10/21/2024
10/21/2024 Re-Configured Quote ID: 29903 R1
Mr Scott Kooreman

CITY OF LIVERMORE
3500 Robertson Park Rd
Livermore, California, 94550
Dear Scott Kooreman,
National Auto Fleet Group is pleased to quote the following vehicle(s) for your consideration.

Seven (7) New/Unused (2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility (K8A) AWD, Black and White Paint) and delivered to your specified location, each for
- per the attached specifications.

This vehicle(s) is available under the Sourcewell Contract 091521-NAF . Please reference this Contract number on all purchase orders to National Auto Fleet Group. Payment terms are Net 20 days after receipt of vehicle.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.

Sincerely,
ATTACHMENT 2
350
Vehicle Configuration Options
ENGINE
Code Description
99W Engine: 3.3L V6 Direct-Injection Hybrid System, (STD)

TRANSMISSION
Code Description
44B Transmission: 10-Speed Automatic, (STD)

PRIMARY PAINT
Code Description
UM Agate Black

SEAT TYPE
Code Description
9W
Charcoal Black, Unique HD Cloth Front Bucket Seats w/Vinyl Rear, -inc: reduced bolsters, 6-way power track driver seat (fore/aft, up/down, tilt w/manual recline, 2-way manual lumbar), 8-way power track passenger seat w/2-way power recline and 2-way power lumbar and built-in steel intrusion plates in both driver/passenger seatbacks

AXLE RATIO
Code Description
___ 3.73 Axle Ratio, (STD)

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT
Code Description
76D Underbody Deflector Plate, -inc: Engine and transmission shield 51S Dual Driver & Passenger LED Bulb Spot Lamps (Unity) 66A
Front Headlamp Lighting Solution, -inc: LED low beam/high beam headlamp, wig-wag function and (2) red/blue/white LED side warning lights in each headlamp (factory configured: driver's side white/red/passenger side white/blue), Wiring and LED lights included (in headlamps only; grille lights not included), Controller not included, Grille LED Lights, Siren & Speaker Pre-Wiring
59B Keyed Alike - 1284x
90E
Ballistic Door-Panels (Level III+), -inc: Driver and passenger front-doors, Tested and meets the requirements of NIJ standard 0108.01 Level III: 7.62 x 51 mm 9.7g M80 (.308 Winchester 150gr), Per LAPD requirements, they're also designed to withstand special threat rounds: 7.62 x 39 mm MSC 7.9g (Type 56), 5.56 x 45 mm M193 3.36g and 5.56 x 45mm M855 4g
68G
Rear-Door Controls Inoperable, -inc: Locks, handles and windows, Can manually remove window or door disable plate w/special tool, Locks/windows operable from driver's door switches
ATTACHMENT 2
351
87M 8" Rear Camera Image, -inc: In upper lefthand quadrant of display, 1/4 size picture in picture
60R Noise Suppression Bonds (Ground Straps)

OPTION PACKAGE
Code Description
500A Order Code 500A
ATTACHMENT 2
352
2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD

CODE MSRP
K8A $49,515.00
99W $0.00
44B $0.00
UM $0.00
9W $0.00
___ $0.00
76D $340.00
51S $620.00
66A $900.00
59B $50.00
90E $3,170.00
68G $80.00
87M $0.00
60R $100.00
500A $0.00
$54,775.00
$0.00
$1,595.00
$56,370.00
Est City: N/A MPG
Est Highway: N/A MPG
Est Highway Cruising Range: N/A mi
2025 Fleet/Non-Retail Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD

WINDOW STICKER
MODEL
2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD

OPTIONS
Engine: 3.3L V6 Direct-Injection Hybrid System, (STD)
Transmission: 10-Speed Automatic, (STD)
Agate Black
Charcoal Black, Unique HD Cloth Front Bucket Seats w/Vinyl Rear, -inc: reduced bolsters, 6-way power track driver seat (fore/aft, up/down, tilt w/manual recline, 2-way manual lumbar), 8-way power track passenger seat w/2-way power recline and 2-way power lumbar and built-in steel intrusion plates in both driver/passenger seatbacks

3.73 Axle Ratio, (STD)
Underbody Deflector Plate, -inc: Engine and transmission shield Dual Driver & Passenger LED Bulb Spot Lamps (Unity)
Front Headlamp Lighting Solution, -inc: LED low beam/high beam headlamp, wig-wag function and (2) red/blue/white LED side warning lights in each headlamp (factory configured: driver's side white/red/passenger side white/blue), Wiring and LED lights included (in headlamps only; grille lights not included), Controller not included, Grille LED Lights, Siren & Speaker Pre-Wiring Keyed Alike - 1284x
Ballistic Door-Panels (Level III+), -inc: Driver and passenger front-doors, Tested and meets the requirements of NIJ standard 0108.01 Level III: 7.62 x 51 mm 9.7g M80 (.308 Winchester 150gr), Per LAPD requirements, they're also designed to withstand special threat rounds: 7.62 x 39 mm MSC 7.9g (Type 56), 5.56 x 45 mm M193 3.36g and 5.56 x 45mm M855 4g Rear-Door Controls Inoperable, -inc: Locks, handles and windows, Can manually remove window or door disable plate w/special tool, Locks/windows operable from driver's door switches 8" Rear Camera Image, -inc: In upper lefthand quadrant of display, 1/4 size picture in picture Noise Suppression Bonds (Ground Straps)
Order Code 500A
Please note selected options override standard equipment

SUBTOTAL
Advert/ Adjustments
Manufacturer Destination Charge

TOTAL PRICE
ATTACHMENT 2
353
Standard Equipment

MECHANICAL
Engine: 3.3L V6 Direct-Injection Hybrid System -inc: (136-MPH top speed) (STD) Late availability.

Transmission: 10-Speed Automatic (STD)

3.73 Axle Ratio (STD)

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT
50-State Emissions System Flexible Fuel Vehicle (FFV) system is standard equipment for vehicles equipped with the 3.3L V6 Direct-Injection engine.

Transmission w/Driver Selectable Mode and Oil Cooler
Automatic Full-Time All-Wheel
Engine Oil Cooler
92-Amp/Hr 850CCA Maintenance-Free Battery
Hybrid Electric Motor 220 Amp Alternator
Class III Towing Equipment -inc: Hitch
Trailer Wiring Harness
Police/Fire
1670# Maximum Payload
GVWR: 6,840 lbs (3,103 kgs)
Gas-Pressurized Shock Absorbers
Front And Rear Anti-Roll Bars
Electric Power-Assist Steering
19 Gal. Fuel Tank
Dual Stainless Steel Exhaust
Permanent Locking Hubs
Strut Front Suspension w/Coil Springs
Multi-Link Rear Suspension w/Coil Springs
Regenerative 4-Wheel Disc Brakes w/4-Wheel ABS, Front And Rear Vented Discs, Brake Assist and Hill Hold Control
Lithium Ion (li-Ion) Traction Battery 1.5 kWh Capacity
Wheels: 18" x 8" 5-Spoke Painted Black Steel -inc: polished stainless steel hub cover and center caps Tires: 255/60R18 AS BSW
Steel Spare Wheel
Full-Size Spare Tire Mounted Inside Under Cargo
Clearcoat Paint
Body-Colored Front Bumper w/Black Rub Strip/Fascia Accent and 1 Tow Hook Body-Colored Rear Bumper w/Black Rub Strip/Fascia Accent Body-Colored Bodyside Cladding and Black Wheel Well Trim ATTACHMENT 2
354
Black Side Windows Trim and Black Front Windshield Trim Black Door Handles
Black Power Side Mirrors w/Convex Spotter and Manual Folding Fixed Rear Window w/Fixed Interval Wiper, Heated Wiper Park and Defroster Deep Tinted Glass
Speed Sensitive Variable Intermittent Wipers
Galvanized Steel/Aluminum Panels
Lip Spoiler
Black Grille
Liftgate Rear Cargo Access
Tailgate/Rear Door Lock Included w/Power Door Locks
Auto On/Off Projector Beam Led Low/High Beam Headlamps
LED Brakelights
Radio w/Seek-Scan and Speed Compensated Volume Control
Radio: AM/FM/MP3 Capable -inc: 100 watt siren/speaker prep kit, clock, 4 speakers, 1 USB port and 8" color LCD screen center-stack smart display, supports Android Auto and Apple CarPlay and fleet telematics modem Allows data to be provided to support Ford Pro telematics and data services via optional subscription, including but not limited to vehicle location, speed, idle time, fuel, vehicle diagnostics and maintenance alerts. Device enables optional telematics services through Ford or authorized providers via paid subscription. Subscribe at https://fordpro.com/en-us/telematics/ or call 1- 833-811-FORD (3673).

SYNC Phoenix Communication & Entertainment System -inc: hands-free voice command support compatible w/most Bluetooth connected mobile devices, 911 Assist, VHR, SYNC Services, AppLink, Bluetooth, steering wheel controls, USB port and auxiliary input jack Integrated Roof Antenna
1 LCD Monitor In The Front
8-Way Driver Seat
Passenger Seat
35-30-35 Folding Split-Bench Front Facing Fold Forward Seatback Rear Seat Manual Tilt/Telescoping Steering Column
Gauges -inc: Speedometer, Odometer, Engine Coolant Temp, Tachometer, Engine Hour Meter, Traction Battery Level, Trip Odometer and Trip Computer
Power Rear Windows and Fixed 3rd Row Windows
Remote Keyless Entry
Remote Releases -Inc: Power Cargo Access
Cruise Control w/Steering Wheel Controls
Dual Zone Front Automatic Air Conditioning
Rear HVAC
HVAC -inc: Underseat Ducts
Locking Glove Box
Driver Foot Rest
Unique HD Cloth Front Bucket Seats w/Vinyl Rear -inc: reduced bolsters, 6-way power track driver seat (fore/aft, up/down, tilt w/manual recline, 2-way manual lumbar), 8-way power track passenger seat w/2- ATTACHMENT 2
355
way power recline and 2-way power lumbar and built-in steel intrusion plates in both driver/passenger seatbacks
Interior Trim -inc: Metal-Look Instrument Panel Insert, Metal-Look Door Panel Insert and Metal-Look Interior Accents
Full Cloth Headliner
Urethane Gear Shifter Material
Day-Night Rearview Mirror
Driver And Passenger Visor Vanity Mirrors
Mini Overhead Console w/Storage and 2 12V DC Power Outlets Front And Rear Map Lights
Fade-To-Off Interior Lighting
Full Vinyl/Rubber Floor Covering
Carpet Floor Trim
Cargo Features -inc: Cargo Tray/Organizer
Cargo Space Lights
Fleet Telematics Modem Tracker System
Dashboard Storage, Driver And Passenger Door Bins
Power 1st Row Windows w/Driver And Passenger 1-Touch Up/Down Delayed Accessory Power
Power Door Locks
Driver Information Center
Redundant Digital Speedometer
Trip Computer
Digital/Analog Appearance
Seats w/Vinyl Back Material
Manual Adjustable Front Head Restraints and Manual Adjustable Rear Head Restraints Perimeter Alarm
2 12V DC Power Outlets
Air Filtration
Electronic Stability Control (ESC) And Roll Stability Control (RSC) ABS And Driveline Traction Control
Side Impact Beams
Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Seat-Mounted Side Airbags Reverse Sensing System Rear Parking Sensors
BLIS (Blind Spot Information System) Blind Spot
Pre-Collision Assist with Pedestrian Detection
Collision Mitigation-Front
Collision Mitigation-Rear
Tire Specific Low Tire Pressure Warning
Dual Stage Driver And Passenger Front Airbags
Curtain 1st And 2nd Row Airbags
ATTACHMENT 2
356
Airbag Occupancy Sensor
Passenger Knee Airbag
Rear Child Safety Locks
Outboard Front Lap And Shoulder Safety Belts -inc: Rear Center 3 Point, Height Adjusters and Pretensioners
Back-Up Camera w/Washer
ATTACHMENT 2
357
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER
TO 72 HOUR LLC DBA NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $459,558 FOR SEVEN 2025 HYBRID

FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITIES
The Livermore Police Department operates 38 marked patrol cars for community protection and emergency services. The City of Livermore’s Fleet Policy currently recommends the replacement of seven patrol vehicles.

Livermore Municipal Code section 2.68.360 permits the purchase of certain goods and services through qualifying cooperative purchasing programs. Livermore Municipal Code section 2.68.370 permits the City to participate in cooperative purchasing programs if the underlying purchase was made using a quotation or bid procedure at least as restrictive as the City’s.
72 Hour LLC, which does business as National Auto Fleet Group, holds a Sourcewell (formerly National Joint Powers Alliance) competitively bid cooperative purchasing contract for passenger cars and light duty pickups, which include police vehicles. This cooperative purchasing program meets the requirements of the Livermore Municipal Code.

On October 21, 2024, the City received a quote from National Auto Fleet Group for seven 2025 Ford Police Interceptor Utilities (i.e., patrol vehicles) and associated warranties in the amount of $459,558.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it:

1. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to execute a purchase order, on behalf of the City of Livermore, with National Auto Fleet Group in an amount not-toexceed $459,558 for the purchase and delivery of seven 2025 Hybrid Ford Police Interceptor Utilities and associated warranties in accordance with the terms, specifications and general provisions specified in Sourcewell contract #091521-NAF, and section 2.68.370 of the Livermore Municipal Code.

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or her designee, to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on November 25, 2024, by the following vote:
358
RESOLUTION NO. ________
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Molly O’Toole
Deborah L. Elam Molly A. O’Toole
City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
359
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.1
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Paul Spence, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: THIS ITEM IS BEING CONTINUED TO A DATE TO BE DETERMINED. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Power Purchase Agreement with Ava Community Energy to install solar and battery storage at critical municipal facilities.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Power Purchase Agreement with Ava Community Energy to install solar and battery storage at critical municipal facilities.

SUMMARY

DISCUSSION

ATTACHMENTS
Prepared by: Tricia Pontau
Sustainability Program Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
360
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.2
DATE: November 25, 2024
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Hearing to consider a proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Site Plan Design Review for a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision (Garaventa Hills), consisting of 38 single-family detached units and 6 duet/couplet units and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council take the following actions to authorize the development of the Garaventa Hills residential project:

1. Adopt a resolution certifying the Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act;

2. Adopt a resolution approving Subdivision (SUB) 13-001 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13- 005, subject to conditions, and authorizing the applicant to provide six affordable duet units as proposed and to make an equivalency payment to satisfy the remaining fractional portion of the affordable housing requirement; and,

3. Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.

SUMMARY
The Garaventa Hills project (Project) proposes a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision on a vacant, approximately 32-acre site. The site is located north of I-580, west of Laughlin Road and east of Vasco Road at the terminus of Bear Creek Drive (Assessor Parcel Number 99B-5300-10).

In December 2018, the Planning Commission considered the Project and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the Project’s EIR and approve the Project. In April 2019, the Livermore City Council certified the EIR and approved the Project.

The EIR certification and project approval were challenged by Save the Hill Group. The Alameda County Superior Court dismissed this writ petition in its entirety. However, the Court of Appeal ruled the EIR was inadequate because it did not contain sufficient information regarding the potential availability of funding 361
for open space acquisition and conservation of the Project site in the no-project alternative analysis. The Court of Appeal upheld the EIR on all other grounds. In accordance with the appellate court's direction, the City Council rescinded the certification of the EIR and approval of the Garaventa Hills project in November 2022.

The applicant, Livermore LT Ventures I Group, LLC., has exercised their right to bring the Garaventa Hills project back for review by the City and is proceeding with the same Project that the prior EIR evaluated. Staff and the environmental consultant have prepared environmental review documents for the Project in accordance with CEQA. Consistent with the Superior Court order and Court of Appeal decision, a Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report (RP Final EIR) has been prepared to analyze the potential availability of funding for open space acquisition and conservation of the project site in the no-project alternative analysis.

The City’s review includes Planning Commission and City Council consideration of the RP Final EIR (Exhibit B to the CEQA Resolution ) that addresses the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal, and the previously rescinded Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Plan Design Review application. The Planning Commission considered the Project on November 12, 2024, and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the EIR and approve the Project. Please see the Planning Commission section of this report for more information.

The RP Final EIR, together with the Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RP Draft EIR) published in July 2024, as well as the prior EIR documents that include the original Draft EIR (November 2012, SCH#2011112045), Final EIR (June 2014), and Re-Issued Final EIR (August 2018) shall constitute the EIR for the proposed Project in Livermore, California. The prior EIR documents may be found on the city's website at https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/garaventa-hills-project The applicant is proceeding with the same Project that the prior EIR evaluated. Therefore, there are no changes to the project impacts that were evaluated in the prior EIR documents.

The Project is consistent with the 2003 General Plan, Livermore Development Code, Design Standards & Guidelines, and other applicable ordinances and development standards. The Project is comparable in development pattern to the neighboring Altamont Creek and Bluff’s developments to the east and northeast. The on-site knolls and rock outcrop that currently are privately owned will be publicly accessible and maintained by the Project’s homeowners association. The EIR also indicates that the site can be developed without significant impacts to the environment and supports this infill residential development at a density envisioned under the current 2003 General Plan and the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

City Council Role and Responsibility
The Project is consistent with existing laws (General Plan and Zoning). Therefore, the City Council will be acting in a quasi-judicial role. In this adjudicatory role, the City Council’s discretion is limited to judging if a project is consistent with existing laws. If the City Council find the project complies with existing laws and design standards, then the City Council is required to approve the project although it may propose appropriate and lawful conditions, as staff has proposed.

DISCUSSION
362

DESCRIPTION, CONTEXT, AND ANALYSIS
The Project is the same project reviewed by the Planning Commission on December 4, 2018, and approved by the City Council on April 22, 2019. For a complete project description, site context, and analysis of consistency with the General Plan, Livermore Development Code, and applicable State and local standards, please review the April 22, 2019, City Council staff report (Attachment 5) and December 4, 2018, Planning Commission staff report with its attachments 4, 5, 6, and 7 (Attachment 3).

The Project is a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision on a vacant, approximately 32-acre site. A westerly extension of Bear Creek Drive would provide access to the internal residential street circumscribing the site’s two prominent knolls. Proposed single-family detached lot sizes range from 8,740 to 13,160 square feet, with homes between 2,390 to 3,150 square feet in size, excluding garages.

Less than half of the site, approximately 40 percent of the site, would be developed with roadways and lots. The knolls would remain undeveloped with informal public-access trails for hiking and vista views.

The remaining area would include a stormwater detention basin at the southeast corner and natural areas surrounding development to buffer the nearby creek, wetlands, and other sensitive habitat.

A homeowner’s association would be responsible for the maintenance of the private street, detention basin, project landscaping, and all open space areas (including trails). The informal trails currently found on the privately owned knolls would be formally designated for public access. A community facilities district would fund maintenance of the emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and bicycle bridge.

BACKGROUND
The site has an extensive land use history and has residential General Plan land use designations dating back to the 1976 General Plan. Please see the December 4, 2018, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 3) for the site’s land use history.

The applicant submitted a development application to the City of Livermore in 2011 for 76 detached single-family residential units on the vacant, approximately 32-acre site. The City of Livermore contracted with Lamphier-Gregory (Consultant) to prepare an EIR for the Project. The Project was evaluated in a 2012 Draft EIR and subsequent environmental documents to reflect revisions to the Project. The applicant made subsequent revisions to the application that were evaluated in 2014 and 2018 EIR documents summarized below:
2012 Draft EIR – included environmental analysis of a project that proposed 76 residential units and a vehicular bridge connecting to Hawk Street. The Draft EIR considered all environmental topic areas, evaluated the Project impacts, and identified two alternatives to the project. 2014 Final EIR – responded to comments on the Draft EIR and presented information to conclude that a revised project proposing 47 residential units and no bridge over Hawk Street was covered by the prior 2012 EIR analysis.
2018 Re-Issued Final EIR – presented information and analysis to conclude that the 2018 Revised Project, proposing 44 residential units and a pedestrian bridge connection to Hawk Street, was within the prior analysis and updated responses to comments as necessary to reflect the revised 44-unit project.
363
In December 2018, the Planning Commission considered the 2018 Revised Project and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the EIR and approve the 2018 Revised Project. In April 2019, the Livermore City Council certified the EIR and approved the 2018 Revised Project.

In May 2019, a lawsuit was brought by Save the Hill Group, bringing a writ of mandate petition challenging the City's certification of the EIR and approval of the 2018 Revised Project.

In September 2020, the Superior Court for the County of Alameda dismissed Save the Hill Group’s petition in its entirety, finding 1) Save the Hill Group failed to exhaust their administrative remedies regarding their claims that the no-project alternative analyzed in the EIR was inadequate, and 2) denying the remainder of their claims that the EIR was inadequate. The Superior Court rejected all challenges to the EIR’s impact analysis.

In March 2022, the Court of Appeal of the State of California ruled that the EIR was inadequate for the limited reason that the EIR failed to include sufficient information regarding the potential availability of funding for open space acquisition and conservation of the project site in the no-project alternative analysis. The Court of Appeal found all of Save the Hill’s other challenges to the EIR meritless, including challenges to the EIR’s biological resources impact analysis and mitigation measures and hydrological impacts on the Springtown Alkali Sink. In accordance with the appellate court's decision, the City Council rescinded the certification of the EIR and approval of the Garaventa Hills project in November 2022.

In early 2023, the applicant exercised their right to bring the Garaventa Hills project back for review by the City, which requires revising the EIR to address the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal. A RP Draft EIR was subsequently prepared to analyze the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal.

The RP Draft EIR was published on July 30, 2024, and circulated for public review and comment until September 13, 2024. On August 20, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the RP Draft EIR.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Court of Appeal upheld the adequacy of the EIR on all issues other than the discussion of the potential funding sources available for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. A full discussion of the Project’s impacts related to hydrology, hazards, and biological resources were included in the EIR and the RP Draft EIR was not required to re-open the EIR’s analyses.

Recirculation of an EIR to address a limited issue is not grounds to revisit issues laid to rest in prior analysis upheld by the Court. Therefore, consistent with the Court of Appeal’s decision, the RP Draft EIR was limited to recirculation of the discussion of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. The EIR details the extensive efforts the City made to consider the potential for acquisition and preservation through potential open space acquisition funds, which included extensive efforts to meet and confer as required by applicable agreements. Ultimately, City staff have concluded on the basis of substantial evidence in the RP Draft EIR that:
“The property owner is not a willing seller. Without a willing seller, the Project site has been determined not to be eligible for funding through the Altamont Landfill Open Space Fund or the Dougherty Valley 364
Settlement Agreement funds.
“Use of eminent domain to acquire the property from an unwilling seller, if it could be defended legally, would be costly (over $17-25 million) and contrary to the City’s past practice. There are other funding sources available for an eminent domain approach, including the Open Space Acquisition and Management Fund, Transferable Development Credits Fund, and/or General Fund allocation (if authorized by voters through ballot initiatives/bond measures); however, these funds are either not eligible to be used for the Project site or are prioritized elsewhere. “Additionally, the Project site has a long-established residential designation and is identified in the current Livermore General Plan Housing Element site inventory as a site for residential development.

Under the No Net Loss provisions of state housing laws, additional process would be required to remove the Project site from the Housing Element’s residential development site inventory, which could add additional cost to the acquisition of the site for open space preservation. “Alternative A: No Project, No Development represents the possibility that the Project site would be preserved as open space. As discussed above, the potential funding sources for such open space acquisition and preservation have been explored and it has been concluded that the site is either ineligible for use of those funds due to an unwilling seller or would require legally complicated and costprohibitive fair market value eminent domain proceedings and use of funds prioritized elsewhere. “The analysis and evidence cited above can support a conclusion by the lead agency that Alternative A:

No Project, No Development involving site acquisition and preservation as open space is not a “feasible” alternative the lead agency is compelled to adopt. [Footnotes omitted]. The lead agency will take this evidence and analysis into account when making the findings required by CEQA regarding the feasibility of Alternative A: No Project, No Development."
There were no other changes to the conclusions in the prior EIR documents. There are no significant adverse environmental impacts identified that cannot be mitigated with feasible mitigation measures.

The RP Draft EIR was published on July 30, 2024, for a 45-day public comment period, which closed on September 13, 2024, at 5:00 pm. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the RP Draft EIR on August 20, 2024. Comments received during the comment period, including those from the August 20 Planning Commission hearing, were compiled and are presented together with responses to these comments in the RP Final EIR.

The city received 12 letters/emails from persons or groups commenting on the RP Draft EIR for the Project, in addition to verbal comments at the August 20, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. Many of the comments were not related to the scope of the RP Final EIR, which is the discussion of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. The City need only respond in the RP Final EIR to comments received on the RP Draft EIR that address the No Project, No Development Alternative, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(f)(2). However, the RP Final EIR does include responses to comments received relating to issues that are not considered part of the environmental analysis and/or are beyond the scope of the RP Final EIR.

Comments beyond the scope of the RP Final EIR primarily expressed that there is significant new information regarding the Project’s potential to increase the risk of flooding, encountering hydrocarbons 365
in the area, impacts to biological resources, and exposure to wildfire. Further, that such new information requires recirculation of the EIR. Other comments include opposition to the Project, and concerns with impacts to air quality, traffic and views. City staff have considered all comments and concluded that there is no “significant new information” under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; therefore, no further recirculation of the EIR is required.

Flooding was addressed in Chapter 12 and associated Appendix G of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-41 to 26-42 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR indicated that existing site soils are relatively impervious and precipitation falling on the site currently drains quickly in the form of surface flows, largely to the adjacent Altamont Creek. Hydrological analysis and design acknowledges and is intended to address even uncommon flooding conditions (“100 year” events), as detailed on pages 12-9 and 12-10 of the Draft EIR and page 9 of Appendix G. Proposed on-site stormwater treatment and collection elements include bio-retention on each lot and a detention basin at the southeast corner of the site. As indicated on page 12-9 of the Draft EIR, plan-level stormwater calculations demonstrated that the Project with proposed stormwater elements would not increase runoff from the site, and that detailed design-level hydraulic computations are required to confirm this as a standard construction permit requirement. The full hydrological assessment in the EIR (Appendix G) determined that the Project would not have a significant impact on the ability of the creek to contain flood waters and Project revisions further reduced the proposed development footprint (page 26-42 of the Re-Issued Final EIR). With the Project as proposed including stormwater treatment and collection elements, the impact with respect to flooding was determined to be less than significant.

Regionally, the city continues to coordinate storm drainage programs, plans, and improvements with Zone 7 Water Agency, an Alameda County Special District that provides flood control and water services to the Tri-Valley. The City also implements its own storm water management programs to address flooding citywide. Please see memorandum dated November 5, 2024, from the City Engineer in the RP FEIR regarding the city’s flood control services.

Hydrocarbon (oil) seepage was discussed on pages 11-2, 11-3, 11-6, 11-7 and 12-8 and associated Appendix F of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-38, 26-39 and 26-41 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The history of near-surface hydrocarbons and oil seeps in the vicinity was identified as a known concern in the Draft EIR (pages 11-1 to 11-3) believed to be related to the interaction between the movement of the naturally-occurring oil deposits in the geologic strata (oil-bearing Greenville Sands) and the seasonally-fluctuating groundwater table beneath the Bear Creek site where an oil seep is located.

As indicated in the Draft EIR (page 11-3), “the geologic structure is not continuous from the Bear Creek site oil seep to the Project site and that therefore, it is unlikely that there are oil bearing Greenville Sands near-surface at the Project site. Supporting this conclusion, no evidence of near-surface oil or seepage was found at the Project site through site reconnaissance, surface borings, or deeper borings (down to 62 feet) performed at the Project site by ENGEO. However, oil seeps did not become apparent until five years after construction of the Bear Creek Development. Therefore, oil seeps may be expected to move laterally within one mile of the identified location or to rise to the surface within the next 5-10 years.” While not found or considered likely at the Project site, the possibility of future oil seepage was acknowledged as a potential impact and the EIR concluded that the impact could be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the identified mitigation requiring additional field confirmation during grading with measures requiring design of underground utility and stormwater elements to prevent oil intrusion, additional measures to reduce potential seepage events if any oil is encountered (overexcavation, visqueen lining, and an oil/water separator), and funding for additional remedies should oil seepage occur in the future (Draft EIR pages 11-6 to 11-7). Please see memorandum dated 366
November 5, 2024, from the City Engineer in the RP FEIR regarding the presence of hydrocarbons in the area.

Biological resources were addressed in Chapter 7 of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 23-2 to 23-5 of the Final EIR, and pages 26-13 to 26-28 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR states that the currently undeveloped site consists primarily of non-native annual grasslands, which while common throughout the region, can be used by various special-status species. The Project would also include construction of a pedestrian and emergency access bridge across a creek channel. The EIR concludes that the potentially significant impacts from development of the Project on biological resources would be less than significant with mitigation. Impacts from potential construction-period disturbance and the permanent change of the site to residential development would be reduced through required preconstruction surveys to assess for sensitive species closer to construction activities, protections to avoid direct or indirect construction impacts as feasible depending on habitat or species, coordination with regulatory agencies as appropriate (US Fish and Wildlife Service and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife), and offsite compensatory habitat.

Comments did not identify or otherwise provide evidence of specific species of concern though one indicated a connection between habitat and runoff as a concern. Evaluation of potential hydrological impacts to off-site wetlands and associated species was included in the EIR (Appendix G, Appendix J) and as summarized on page 24-12, “the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve receives flows from nearly 645 acres of tributary watershed and that “…the minor changes to onsite drainage patterns proposed with the project will not result in significant impacts to the hydrology of the Garaventa Wetlands [Preserve].” To the extent the comment raises issues related to flooding after the Re-Issued Final EIR, the City Engineer has reviewed the comment and determined that the comment is not substantial new information. Please see the memorandum from the City Engineer included in Master Response 2 of the RP EIR addressing the Project’s flooding risk and impacts from runoff. To the extent the comment raises issues related to biological resources after the Re-Issued Final EIR, the City’s commissioned expert biologist has independently confirmed in a memorandum included in Master Response 2 of the RP EIR that there are no new listings in the CNDDB regarding endangered species and that changed or pending changes to listing status since the Re-Issued Final EIR are either already adequately addressed or can be addressed by a modest revision to Mitigation Measure Bio-9, which would not be considered substantial new information because it would not result in a new or worsened significant impact. Please see the memorandum from the biologist included in Master Response 2 and revised Mitigation Measure Bio-9 described in Master Response 2.

Wildfire was addressed on pages 11-7 to 11-8 of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-39 to 26-40 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR concludes that the project is not in a high-risk wildfire area (what would be called a Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone or VHFHSZ by Cal Fire) and would comply with the City’s Wildland-Urban Interface Code requiring the defensible space and fire-retardant materials.

Therefore, the impact related to wildfire would be less than significant. Under current CEQA Standards (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Section XX), a project is considered to have a potentially significant impact under CEQA requiring more detailed analysis if the project site is classified as a VHFHSZ.

According to current mapping, it remains the case that the Project is not located in or near VHFHSZ areas, the closest of which are over 4 miles away to the northwest or southwest.

PLANNING COMMISSION AND PUBLIC COMMENT
367
On November 12, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Project and voted unanimously to recommended that the City Council certify the EIR and approve the Project.

Before the meeting, staff received four emails with comments in opposition to the Project and requesting the city delay considering the Project (Attachment 4). Three of the emails reiterated the comments they had submitted during the public comment period for the RP Draft EIR, including concerns with the age of the EIR, air quality, hydrology, biological resources, and wildfire. One commenter added that the City Council should provide additional affordable units instead of the cash payment equivalent of 3.15 units.

One commenter also noted concern with privacy due to the frequent use of the city-owned property north of Bear Creek Drive and Knoll Court, specifically noting that the property was meant as a buffer/open space and not public trails. One of the commenters stated objection to the project and that the EIR did not adequately address traffic and related noise, grading and the presence of soil pathogens, and the impacts from informal and unauthorized public access on the informal trails. They added that there was no study done to review costs and benefits of the new development and impacts to a nearby Landscaping and Lighting District.

Three speakers (in addition to the project applicant team) commented during the public hearing and expressed concern with the project’s compatibility with the neighborhood, potential presence of hydrocarbons, impacts to biological resources, exposure to wildfire, increased traffic/speeding on local streets, and the reliability of Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) to provide services.

The topics of air quality, hydrology, biological resources, wildfire, and traffic were previously addressed in the EIR and Project Conditions of Approval and are discussed in more detail above in this staff report and attachments. Again, the Court of Appeal upheld the adequacy of the EIR on all issues other than the discussion of the potential funding sources available for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Development Alternative. Recirculation of an EIR to address a limited issue is not grounds to revisit issues laid to rest in prior analysis upheld by the Court.

The new Garaventa project is required to enter into a new Community Facility District (CFD) to fund the costs for maintaining the new amenities such as the new Hawk Street EVA Bridge and new outfall into the Altamont Creek. The new HOA that will be formed for the community will also be responsible for maintenance costs associated with amenities such as the open space that will be preserved and new trails that will be constructed. The existing property owners will not be subject to costs of the new CFD that will be formed. Each community that is built is responsible for the maintenance costs associated with their individual development, but adjacent communities will share in the beneficial use and additional maintenance costs of community members utilizing each other’s amenities (such as the new trails and new pedestrian bridge that will be constructed). More information regarding Landscape Maintenance Districts may be found on the city’s website at the following link:
https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/public-works/maintenance/landscape-maintenance-districts The EIR includes a complete traffic impact analysis and concludes that the Project contributes relatively low volumes of traffic to City roads and intersections that are well within the design capacity of nearby streets. It should also be noted that CEQA no longer requires congestion-based traffic analysis.

The EIR also evaluates energy and concludes that the Project would have a less than significant impact relating to energy consumption with no mitigation warranted. PG&E assesses infrastructure and service demand and requires system upgrades and improvements in pace with new development. 368
The Planning Commission found the EIR is in compliance with the intent and requirements of CEQA and the Project consistent with the General Plan, Livermore Development Code, Design Standards & Guidelines, and all applicable standards. The November 12, 2024, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2) and meeting minutes are provided in Attachment 6 and summarize the discussion, and each Planning Commission Resolution is attached to the City Council Resolutions.

City staff has reviewed all comments received and concluded that none demonstrate the existence of significant new information that would require further recirculation of the EIR nor a supplemental or subsequent EIR under the applicable standards.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The development of the project site will increase property valuation of the vacant parcel, resulting in an increase in property tax revenue to the City. The project will also be subject to applicable development fees that will help offset the financial impacts of the new development. The revenue increase will be offset by expenditures on City services such as public safety and library services to serve the new residents. A homeowner’s association will be responsible for the maintenance of the private street, detention basin, and all open space areas (including trails). A community facilities district will fund maintenance of the emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and bicycle bridge.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
9: Facilitate new development consistent with the City’s General Plan

GUIDING DOCUMENTS
General Plan
Livermore Development Code
Livermore Design Standards & Guidelines

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. 11-12-24 Planning Commission Staff Report

3. 12-4-18 Planning Commission Report with Attachments 4 5 6 7

4. 11-12-24 Planning Commission Comments Received

5. 4-22-19 City Council Report

6. DRAFT Special Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 11.12.24

7. CEQA Resolution

8. Exhibit A PC Reso 36-24, CEQA

9. Exhibit B - Garaventa Hills RP EIR

10. Exhibit C - Facts and Findings
369

11. Exhibit D - MMRP

12. Project Resolution - City Council

13. Exhibit A- PC Reso 37-24, SUB13-001, SPDR13-005 project

14. Exhibit B - Development Plans

15. Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval
Prepared by: Steve Stewart
Special Projects Coordinator
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna Marysheva
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
370
SUB13-001
SPDR13-005

LOCATION MAP
North
SITE
Scenic Ave.

L
a
u
g
hlin
R
o
a
d
N
orth
V
a
s
c
o
R
o
a
d
ATTACHMENT 1
371
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 3.1
DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Steve Riley, Planning Manager
SUBJECT: Hearing to consider a proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Site Plan Design Review for a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision (Garaventa Hills), consisting of 38 single-family detached units and 6 duet/couplet units and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the City Council take the following actions to authorize the development of the Garaventa Hills residential project:

1. Adopt a resolution certifying the EIR pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and,

2. Adopt a resolution approving Subdivision (SUB) 13-001 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13-005, subject to conditions, and authorizing the applicant to provide six affordable duet units as proposed and to make an equivalency payment to satisfy the remaining fractional portion of the affordable housing requirement; and,

3. Direct the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, subject to project approval.

SUMMARY
The Garaventa Hills project (Project) proposes a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision on a vacant, approximately 32-acre site. The site is located north of I-580, west of Laughlin Road and east of Vasco Road at the terminus of Bear Creek Drive (Assessor Parcel Number 99B-5300-10).

In December 2018, the Planning Commission considered the Project and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the Project’s EIR and approve the Project. In April 2019, the Livermore City Council certified the EIR and approved the Project.

The EIR certification and project approval were challenged by Save the Hill Group. The Alameda County Superior Court dismissed this writ petition in its entirety. However, the Court of Appeal ruled the EIR was inadequate because it did not contain sufficient information regarding the potential availability of funding ATTACHMENT 2
372
for open space acquisition and conservation of the Project site in the no-project alternative analysis.

The Court of Appeal upheld the EIR on all other grounds. In accordance with the appellate court's direction, the City Council rescinded the certification of the EIR and approval of the Garaventa Hills project in November 2022.

The applicant, Livermore LT Ventures I Group, LLC., has exercised their right to bring the Garaventa Hills project back for review by the City and is proceeding with the same Project that the prior EIR evaluated. Staff and the environmental consultant have prepared environmental review documents for the Project in accordance with CEQA. Consistent with the Superior Court order and Court of Appeal decision, a Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report (RP Final EIR) has been prepared to analyze the potential availability of funding for open space acquisition and conservation of the project site in the no-project alternative analysis.

The City’s review will include Planning Commission and City Council consideration of the RP Final EIR (Attachment 6) that addresses the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal, and the previously rescinded Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and Site Plan Design Review application. The RP Final EIR, together with the Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RP Draft EIR) published in July 2024, as well as the prior EIR documents that include the original Draft EIR (November 2012, SCH#2011112045), Final EIR (June 2014), and Re-Issued Final EIR (August 2018) shall constitute the EIR for the proposed Project in Livermore, California. The prior EIR documents may be found on the city's website at www.https://www.livermoreca.gov/departments/garaventa-hills-project The applicant is proceeding with the same Project that the prior EIR evaluated. Therefore, there are no changes to the project impacts that were evaluated in the prior EIR documents.

The Project is consistent with the 2003 General Plan, Livermore Development Code, Design Standards & Guidelines, and other applicable ordinances and development standards. The Project is comparable in development pattern to the neighboring Altamont Creek and Bluff’s developments to the east and northeast. The on-site knolls and rock outcrop that currently are privately owned will be publicly accessible and maintained by the Project’s homeowners association. The EIR also indicates that the site can be developed without significant impacts to the environment and supports this infill residential development at a density envisioned under the current 2003 General Plan and the 2023-2031 Housing Element.

Planning Commission Role and Responsibility
The Project is consistent with existing laws (General Plan and Zoning). Therefore, the City Council will be acting in a quasi-judicial role. In this adjudicatory role, the Planning Commission’s and City Council’s discretion are limited to judging if a project is consistent with existing laws. If the Planning Commission and City Council find the project complies with existing laws and design standards, then the Commission is required to recommend approval of the project and Council is required to approve the project. Staff anticipates review of the Project by the City Council at their November 25, 2024, meeting.

DISCUSSION

DESCRIPTION, CONTEXT, AND ANALYSIS
The Project is the same project reviewed by the Planning Commission on December 4, 2018, and ATTACHMENT 2
373
approved by the City Council on April 22, 2019. For a complete project description, site context, and analysis of consistency with the General Plan, Livermore Development Code, and applicable State and local standards, please review the April 22, 2019, City Council staff report (Attachment 2) and December 4, 2018, Planning Commission staff report with its attachments 4, 5, 6, and 7 (Attachment 3).

The Project is a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision on a vacant, approximately 32-acre site. A westerly extension of Bear Creek Drive would provide access to the internal residential street circumscribing the site’s two prominent knolls. Proposed single-family detached lot sizes range from 8,740 to 13,160 square feet, with homes between 2,390 to 3,150 square feet in size, excluding garages.

Less than half of the site, approximately 40 percent of the site, would be developed with roadways and lots. The knolls would remain undeveloped with informal public-access trails for hiking and vista views.

The remaining area would include a stormwater detention basin at the southeast corner and natural areas surrounding development to buffer the nearby creek, wetlands, and other sensitive habitat.

A homeowner’s association would be responsible for the maintenance of the private street, detention basin, project landscaping, and all open space areas (including trails). The informal trails currently found on the privately owned knolls would be formally designated for public access. A community facilities district would fund maintenance of the emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and bicycle bridge.

BACKGROUND
The site has an extensive land use history and has residential General Plan land use designations dating back to the 1976 General Plan. Please see the December 4, 2018, Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 3) for the site’s land use history.

The applicant submitted a development application to the City of Livermore in 2011 for 76 detached single-family residential units on the vacant, approximately 32-acre site. The City of Livermore contracted with Lamphier-Gregory (Consultant) to prepare an EIR for the Project. The Project was evaluated in a 2012 Draft EIR and subsequent environmental documents to reflect revisions to the Project. The applicant made subsequent revisions to the application that were evaluated in 2014 and 2018 EIR documents summarized below:
2012 Draft EIR – included environmental analysis of a project that proposed 76 residential units and a vehicular bridge connecting to Hawk Street. The Draft EIR considered all environmental topic areas, evaluated the Project impacts, and identified two alternatives to the project. 2014 Final EIR – responded to comments on the Draft EIR and presented information to conclude that a revised project proposing 47 residential units and no bridge over Hawk Street was covered by the prior 2012 EIR analysis.
2018 Re-Issued Final EIR - presented information and analysis to conclude that the 2018 Revised Project, proposing 44 residential units and a pedestrian bridge connection to Hawk Street, was within the prior analysis and updated responses to comments as necessary to reflect the revised 44-unit project.

In December 2018, the Planning Commission considered the 2018 Revised Project and voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the EIR and approve the 2018 Revised Project.

In April 2019, the Livermore City Council certified the EIR and approved the 2018 Revised Project.

ATTACHMENT 2
374
In May 2019, a lawsuit was brought by Save the Hill Group, bringing a writ of mandate petition challenging the City's certification of the EIR and approval of the 2018 Revised Project.

In September 2020, the Superior Court for the County of Alameda dismissed Save the Hill Group’s petition in its entirety, finding 1) Save the Hill Group failed to exhaust their administrative remedies regarding their claims that the no-project alternative analyzed in the EIR was inadequate, and 2) denying the remainder of their claims that the EIR was inadequate. The Superior Court rejected all challenges to the EIR’s impact analysis.

In March 2022, the Court of Appeal of the State of California ruled that the EIR was inadequate for the limited reason that the EIR failed to include sufficient information regarding the potential availability of funding for open space acquisition and conservation of the project site in the no-project alternative analysis.

The Court of Appeal found all of Save the Hill’s other challenges to the EIR meritless, including challenges to the EIR’s biological resources impact analysis and mitigation measures and hydrological impacts on the Springtown Alkali Sink. In accordance with the appellate court's decision, the City Council rescinded the certification of the EIR and approval of the Garaventa Hills project in November 2022.

In early 2023, the applicant exercised the right to bring the Garaventa Hills project back for review by the City, which requires revising the EIR to address the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal.

A RP Draft EIR was subsequently prepared to analyze the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal. The RP Draft EIR was published on July 30, 2024, and circulated for public review and comment until September 13, 2024. On August 20, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the RP Draft EIR.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Court of Appeal upheld the adequacy of the EIR on all issues other than the discussion of the potential funding sources available for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. A full discussion of the Project’s impacts related to hydrology, hazards, and biological resources were included in the EIR and the RP Draft EIR was not required to re-open the EIR’s analyses.

Recirculation of an EIR to address a limited issue is not grounds to revisit issues laid to rest in prior analysis upheld by the Court. Therefore, consistent with the Court of Appeal’s decision, the RP Draft EIR was limited to recirculation of the discussion of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. The RP Draft EIR concluded on the basis of substantial evidence that:
“The property owner is not a willing seller. Without a willing seller, the Project site has been determined not to be eligible for funding through the Altamont Landfill Open Space Fund or the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement funds.
“Use of eminent domain to acquire the property from an unwilling seller, if it could be defended legally, would be costly (over $17-25 million) and contrary to the City’s past practice. There are other funding sources available for an eminent domain approach, including the Open Space Acquisition and Management Fund, Transferable Development Credits Fund, and/or General Fund allocation (if authorized by voters through ballot initiatives/bond measures); however, these funds are either not eligible to be used for the Project site or are prioritized elsewhere.

ATTACHMENT 2
375
“Additionally, the Project site has a long-established residential designation and is identified in the current Livermore General Plan Housing Element site inventory as a site for residential development.

Under the No Net Loss provisions of state housing laws, additional process would be required to remove the Project site from the Housing Element’s residential development site inventory, which could add additional cost to the acquisition of the site for open space preservation. “Alternative A: No Project, No Development represents the possibility that the Project site would be preserved as open space. As discussed above, the potential funding sources for such open space acquisition and preservation have been explored and it has been concluded that the site is either ineligible for use of those funds due to an unwilling seller or would require legally complicated and costprohibitive fair market value eminent domain proceedings and use of funds prioritized elsewhere. “The analysis and evidence cited above can support a conclusion by the lead agency that Alternative A: No Project, No Development involving site acquisition and preservation as open space is not a “feasible” alternative the lead agency is compelled to adopt. 1,2. The lead agency will take this evidence and analysis into account when making the findings required by CEQA regarding the feasibility of Alternative A: No Project, No Development.“ There were no other changes to the conclusions in the prior EIR documents. There are no significant adverse environmental impacts identified that cannot be mitigated with feasible mitigation measures.

The RP Draft EIR was published on July 30, 2024, for a 45-day public comment period, which closed on September 13, 2024, at 5:00 pm. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the RP Draft EIR on August 20, 2024. Comments received during the comment period, including those from the August 20 Planning Commission hearing, were compiled and are presented together with responses to these comments in the RP Final EIR.

The city received 12 letters/emails from persons or groups commenting on the RP Draft EIR for the Project, in addition to verbal comments at the August 20, 2024, Planning Commission meeting. Many of the comments were not related to the scope of the RP Final EIR, which is the discussion of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. The City need only respond in the RP Final EIR to comments received on the RP Draft EIR that address the No Project, No Development Alternative, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(f)(2). However, the RP Final EIR does include responses to comments received relating to issues that are not considered part of the environmental analysis and/or are beyond the scope of the RP Final EIR.

Comments beyond the scope of the RP Final EIR primarily expressed that there is significant new information regarding the Project’s potential to increase the risk of flooding, encountering hydrocarbons in the area, impacts to biological resources, and exposure to wildfire. Further, that such new information requires recirculation of the EIR. Other comments include opposition to the Project, and concerns with impacts to air quality, traffic and views. City staff have considered all comments and concluded that there is no “significant new information” under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; therefore, no further recirculation of the EIR is required.

1. CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126.6(f)(i).

2. See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1001 (assessing alternatives ATTACHMENT 2
376
feasibility, ‘ “involves a balancing of various ‘economic, environmental, social, and technological factors” ’; ‘ “‘feasibility’ under CEQA encompasses ‘desirability’ to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors.” ’ [internal citations omitted]).

Flooding was addressed in Chapter 12 and associated Appendix G of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-41 to 26-42 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR indicated that existing site soils are relatively impervious and precipitation falling on the site currently drains quickly in the form of surface flows, largely to the adjacent Altamont Creek. Hydrological analysis and design acknowledges and is intended to address even uncommon flooding conditions (“100 year” events), as detailed on pages 12-9 and 12-10 of the Draft EIR and page 9 of Appendix G. Proposed on-site stormwater treatment and collection elements include bio-retention on each lot and a detention basin at the southeast corner of the site. As indicated on page 12-9 of the Draft EIR, plan-level stormwater calculations demonstrated that the Project with proposed stormwater elements would not increase runoff from the site, and that detailed design-level hydraulic computations are required to confirm this as a standard construction permit requirement. The full hydrological assessment in the EIR (Appendix G) determined that the Project would not have a significant impact on the ability of the creek to contain flood waters and Project revisions further reduced the proposed development footprint (page 26-42 of the Re-Issued Final EIR). With the Project as proposed including stormwater treatment and collection elements, the impact with respect to flooding was determined to be less than significant.

Regionally, the city continues to coordinate storm drainage programs, plans, and improvements with Zone 7 Water Agency, an Alameda County Special District that provides flood control and water services to the Tri-Valley. The City also implements its own storm water management programs to address flooding citywide. Please see memorandum dated November 5, 2024, from the City Engineer in the RP FEIR (Attachment 6) regarding the city’s flood control services.

Hydrocarbon (oil) seepage was discussed on pages 11-2, 11-3, 11-6, 11-7 and 12-8 and associated Appendix F of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-38, 26-39 and 26-41 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The history of near-surface hydrocarbons and oil seeps in the vicinity was identified as a known concern in the Draft EIR (pages 11-1 to 11-3) believed to be related to the interaction between the movement of the naturally-occurring oil deposits in the geologic strata (oil-bearing Greenville Sands) and the seasonally-fluctuating groundwater table beneath the Bear Creek site where an oil seep is located. As indicated in the Draft EIR (page 11-3), “the geologic structure is not continuous from the Bear Creek site oil seep to the Project site and that therefore, it is unlikely that there are oil bearing Greenville Sands nearsurface at the Project site. Supporting this conclusion, no evidence of near-surface oil or seepage was found at the Project site through site reconnaissance, surface borings, or deeper borings (down to 62 feet) performed at the Project site by ENGEO. However, oil seeps did not become apparent until five years after construction of the Bear Creek Development. Therefore, oil seeps may be expected to move laterally within one mile of the identified location or to rise to the surface within the next 5-10 years.” While not found or considered likely at the Project site, the possibility of future oil seepage was acknowledged as a potential impact and the EIR concluded that the impact could be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the identified mitigation requiring additional field confirmation during grading with measures requiring design of underground utility and stormwater elements to prevent oil intrusion, additional measures to reduce potential seepage events if any oil is encountered ATTACHMENT 2
377
(overexcavation, visqueen lining, and an oil/water separator), and funding for additional remedies should oil seepage occur in the future (Draft EIR pages 11-6 to 11-7). Please see memorandum dated November 5, 2024, from the City Engineer in the RP FEIR (Attachment 6) regarding the presence of hydrocarbons in the area.

Biological resources were addressed in Chapter 7 of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 23-2 to 23-5 of the Final EIR, and pages 26-13 to 26-28 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR states that the currently undeveloped site consists primarily of non-native annual grasslands, which while common throughout the region, can be used by various special-status species. The Project would also include construction of a pedestrian and emergency access bridge across a creek channel. The EIR concludes that the potentially significant impacts from development of the Project on biological resources would be less than significant with mitigation. Impacts from potential construction-period disturbance and the permanent change of the site to residential development would be reduced through required pre-construction surveys to assess for sensitive species closer to construction activities, protections to avoid direct or indirect construction impacts as feasible depending on habitat or species, coordination with regulatory agencies as appropriate (US Fish and Wildlife Service and/or California Department of Fish and Wildlife), and offsite compensatory habitat.

Comments did not identify or otherwise provide evidence of specific species of concern though one indicated a connection between habitat and runoff as a concern. Evaluation of potential hydrological impacts to off-site wetlands and associated species was included in the EIR (Appendix G, Appendix J) and as summarized on page 24-12, “the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve receives flows from nearly 645 acres of tributary watershed and that “…the minor changes to onsite drainage patterns proposed with the project will not result in significant impacts to the hydrology of the Garaventa Wetlands [Preserve].” To the extent the comment raises issues related to flooding after the Re-Issued Final EIR, the City Engineer has reviewed the comment and determined that the comment is not substantial new information. Please see the memorandum from the City Engineer included in Master Response 2 of the RP EIR addressing the Project’s flooding risk and impacts from runoff. To the extent the comment raises issues related to biological resources after the Re-Issued Final EIR, the City’s commissioned expert biologist has independently confirmed in a memorandum included in Master Response 2 of the RP EIR that there are no new listings in the CNDDB regarding endangered species and that changed or pending changes to listing status since the Re-Issued Final EIR are either already adequately addressed or can be addressed by a modest revision to Mitigation Measure Bio-9, which would not be considered substantial new information because it would not result in a new or worsened significant impact. Please see the memorandum from the biologist included in Master Response 2 and revised Mitigation Measure Bio-9 described in Master Response 2.

Wildfire was addressed on pages 11-7 to 11-8 of the Draft EIR with minor revisions on pages 26-39 to 26-40 of the Re-Issued Final EIR. The EIR concludes that the project is not in a high-risk wildfire area (what would be called a Very High Fire Hazard Safety Zone or VHFHSZ by Cal Fire) and would comply with the City’s Wildland-Urban Interface Code requiring the defensible space and fire-retardant materials. Therefore, the impact related to wildfire would be less than significant. Under current CEQA Standards (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Section XX), a project is considered to have a potentially significant impact under CEQA requiring more detailed analysis if the project site is classified as a VHFHSZ. According to current mapping, it remains the case that the Project is not located in or near VHFHSZ areas, the closest of which are over 4 miles away to the northwest or southwest.

ATTACHMENT 2
378

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. 4-22-19 City Council Report

3. 12-4-18 Planning Commission Staff Report with Attachments 4 5 6 7

4. Development Plans

5. Conditions of Approval

6. Recirculated Partial Final EIR

7. Resolution - CEQA

8. Exhibit A - Garaventa Hills RPFEIR

9. Exhibit B - Facts and Findings Final

10. Exhibit C - MMRP

11. Resolution - Project
Prepared by: Steve Stewart
Special Projects Coordinator
ATTACHMENT 2
379
MEETING DATE:
12-4-2018
AGENDA ITEM:

5.03 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
APPLICATION NOS.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8094 (SUB 13-001) and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13-005
APPLICANT: Lafferty Communities
PROJECT PLANNER: Turhan Sonmez, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Hearing to consider a proposed residential subdivision of 44 units, consisting of 38 single-family detached units and 6 duet/couplet units, on an approximately 31.7 acre vacant site. A proposed westerly extension of Bear Creek Drive would provide access to the internal residential street, and an emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and
bicycle bridge is proposed at Hawk Street.

RECOMMENDATION: Approve subject to conditions
LOCATION: East of North Vasco Road, North of Garaventa Ranch Road/Altamont Creek Drive, and West of Laughlin Road
ZONING: Planned Development/Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 115
GENERAL PLAN: Urban Low Residential (UL-1), 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre
SITE AREA: 31.7+ acres
CEQA STATUS: An Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse Number 2011112045) will be considered for compliance
with the provisions of CEQA.

NOTICE AREA: 1,320 feet
1 ATTACHMENT 3
380
Project Site
This map is based on City of Livermore GIS
Information and reflects the most current information
at the time of this printing. The map is intended for
reference purposes only and the City and its staff is
not responsible for errors. 8,000 Livermore IT, GIS Services 1,333.3
1: NAD_1983_StatePlane_California_III_FIPS_0403_Feet
666.67 Feet 0 1,333.3
11/19/2018
3:48:36 PM
Prepared:

Notes:

Scale:
2 ATTACHMENT 3
381

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
1 TO: Chairperson Bjorklund and
Members of the Planning Commission
PREPARED BY: Turhan Sonmez, Associate Planner
REVIEWED BY: Steve Stewart, Planning Manager
Scott Lee, Principal Planner
DATE: December 4, 2018
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8094 (SUB13-001) and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13-005

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report and, after approval of the application, instruct staff to file the Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk, approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8094 (SUB13-001) and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13-005, subject to conditions, and authorize the applicant to provide six affordable duet units as proposed and to make an equivalency payment to satisfy the remaining fractional portion of the affordable housing requirement.

BACKGROUND
In 1988, the Area A General Plan Amendment changed the project site’s land use designation from Urban Medium Residential (4.5 dwelling units per acre) to Urban Low Medium Residential (3 dwellings per acre).

On July 6, 1990, the Maralisa builder Hal Porter Homes applied for the allocation of 610 units under the City’s 1991 Housing Implementation Program (Attachment 4). The City Council expressed concerns regarding allocating 610 units to a single project. In response, the builder reduced the number of proposed housing units. Thirty-one custom lots covering the knolls were part of the reduced project. On November 13, 1990, the Livermore City Council adopted Resolution 347-90 approving the Housing Implementation Program (HIP) ranking and allocations for the Maralisa project, but reduced the number of units to 397 units over a three-year period (1991-1993). At this 3 ATTACHMENT 3
382
2 time, the City Council also recommended preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Subdivision, Planned Unit Development, and Development Agreement.

On September 12, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution 94-228, certifying an Environmental Impact Report and approving the Maralisa development (Planned Unit Development 54-90 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map 6433). The project consisted of 322 residential units including 64 apartments to be subsequently subdivided into condominiums, 119 townhomes, and 139 single family detached units; 2.1-acre park; 10- acre school site; and several parcels for landscaping, environmental protection, and subsequent development. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) included a standard that required a separate environmental determination before permitting any development on the Project site. The PUD also notes that a portion of the density for the Project site is transferred to properties within the Maralisa development south of Altamont Creek. To remain consistent with the General Plan designation for the overall property (3 dwellings per acre), the maximum number of units permitted on the Project site was 76 units.

On March 10, 1997, the Livermore City Council adopted Resolution 97-50 approving an amendment to the Maralisa project to replace 64 condominium/apartments and 119 townhomes with 123 single-family small lot/courtyard detached units and 50 apartments.

The PUD Amendment included the same language as the original PUD, requiring separate environmental review prior to developing the Project site; noting the transfer of density to areas south of Altamont Creek; and to remain consistent with the General Plan designation for the overall property limiting the maximum number of units permitted on the Project site to 76 units.

On January 24, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution 2000-10 approving the 2000 Housing Implementation Program allocations. Western Pacific/Garaventa applied for 45 housing unit allocations for the Project site (Attachment 5). The Project, Maralisa Summit, was ranked “Below Average” and did not receive allocations. The Below Average ranking was due to below average landscaping, contributions to City facilities, and project location. The applicant also did not conduct any environmental assessment on the Project site.

During the City’s 2003 General Plan Update, the Project site’s designation was changed again to the current designation of Urban Low Residential (1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre). Undeveloped properties to the north and east between the Bluffs and Meadow Glen Drive received the same designation. Lowering the density was due to the potential, but unknown environmental sensitivity of the sites. This General Plan land use designation density allows up to 47 residential units on the project site.

On July 27, 2011, the applicant submitted a development application for 76 homes on the site. The application included a General Plan Amendment to change the designation to Urban Low Medium Residential (2 to 3 dwelling units per acre) in order to enable the continued density transfer envisioned under the Maralisa development. 4 ATTACHMENT 3
383
3 On October 24, 2011, the City Council adopted a Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with Lamphier-Gregory, an environmental planning consultant, to conduct environmental review for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The applicant is funding the environmental review, but the consultant is under City direction.

On December 4, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the current applicant’s initial proposal. The initial proposal was for 76 homes with a second vehicular access via an extension of Hawk Street and new bridge across Altamont Creek. The proposal included a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Urban Low Residential, at 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre, to Urban Low Medium Residential, at 2 to 3 dwelling units per acre.

In response to direction from City staff and comments received during the December 4, 2012, Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant made the changes listed below before the Planning Commission’s consideration of the Project:
• Reduction in the number of units from 76 to 47,
• Elimination of the Hawk Street connection and bridge over Altamont Creek, • Preservation of the rock outcrop in the northwest corner of the site, and • Provision of an additional one-story floor plan and a one-and-a-half-story floor plan.

On July 1, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council deny the Project. The Commission’s recommendation was due to the Project’s extensive grading, unknown aesthetic context, and concern from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District (Park District) regarding compatibility with the adjacent Garaventa Preserve. The applicant chose not to pursue a decision from the City Council. Instead, they chose to make more changes to the project and return to the Planning Commission.

The applicant, Lafferty Communities, made further changes to the project in response to comments made during the July 1, 2014, Planning Commission hearing, and concerns from the Park District. Changes to the Project after the July 1 Planning Commission meeting included:
• Replacing a portion of roadway with an Emergency Vehicle Access in order to reduce grading,
• Eliminating new landscaping between the Project site and the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve to preserve the natural grassland condition,
• Providing a drain system to collect all runoff from the residential lots and convey it to the treatment basin to protect the soil chemistry in the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve.
• Constructing a pedestrian/bicycle path that connects to the existing trail south of Bear Creek Drive to link the Project to Altamont Creek Park, and • Providing visual simulations of the Project in context with the surrounding developed and natural environments.
5 ATTACHMENT 3
384
4 On August 18, 2015, the Planning Commission considered the revised project, held a public hearing, and recommended unanimously to approve the project. The Planning Commission commended the applicant for revising the development plans to address concerns from the Commission, community, and Park District.

On September 14, 2015, the City Council directed the project be returned to the Planning Commission and staff with direction for the project to be more subordinate to the natural landforms and provide alternatives for emergency vehicle and pedestrian circulation. This direction was provided with Council Resolution No. 2015-127 (Attachment 9).

On August 23, 2018, the City held a neighborhood meeting to present the latest changes to the Project and answer questions. See the Project Description section below for details regarding these additional changes.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Currrent Project
The applicant, Lafferty Communities, is proposing the following changes to the project in response to comments made during the September 14, 2015, City Council hearing to make the project subordinate to the natural landforms:
• Reducing the number of units from 47 to 44 (including six affordable duet units), • Reducing the average size of the units,
• Altering Roof forms to provide view corridors,
• Complying with the standards of the underlying zoning district (Planned Unit Development 115),
• Narrowing the road widths,
• Reducing the height of retaining walls,
• Providing an emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and bicycle bridge from Hawk Street,
• Providing additional diversity in the proposed housing stock in terms of architecture, colors, and materials, and
• Providing new and updated visual simulations of the Project in context with the surrounding developed and natural environments.

The Project is a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision on a vacant, approximately 32-acre site. A westerly extension of Bear Creek Drive provides access to the internal residential street circumscribing the site’s two prominent knolls. Single-family detached lot sizes range from 8,740 square feet to 13,160 square feet with homes between 2,390 to 3,150 square feet in size, excluding garage. The duet lots range in size from 4,370 square feet to 5,375 square feet with homes of either 1,380 or 1,690 square feet in size, excluding garage. The duet units are attached along one wall, but each unit is on an individual lot with a property line located in the center of the shared wall. Lots and roadways will comprise approximately 40 percent of the site, with the remaining land 6 ATTACHMENT 3
385
5 reserved for open space buffers on the site’s edges, undeveloped knolls with pedestrian trails, and a storm water detention basin with outfall pipe to Altamont Creek.

The Project includes applications for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Site Plan Design Review. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map will subdivide the site into 47 individual parcels, including 38 detached single-family residential lots, 6 attached single-family residential lots, and 3 homeowners association (HOA) parcels that include an open space buffer around the perimeter of the site, a storm water detention basin, the two knolls, public trails, and Bear Creek Common.

PROJECT SITE CONTEXT
The Project is located north of Garaventa Ranch Road and Altamont Creek Elementary School, west of Bear Creek Drive and Laughlin Road. The approximately 32-acre site is an undeveloped parcel consisting predominantly of non-native grassland.

The topography of the site is moderately sloping, having a predominantly 15 percent to 20 percent slope. Altamont Creek, an intermittent stream channel, forms the southern boundary of the site. A saddled ridgeline forms a connection between the two knolls in roughly the center of the site.

The following table summarizes the General Plan land use designation, zoning classification, and existing land use of the subject site and surrounding parcels:

General Plan Designation Current Zoning
Classification
Existing
Land Use
North Urban Low Residential
1-1.5 dwelling units per acre (UL-1)
Planned Development
(PD)
Vacant parcel with grassland/cattle
grazing
South
Parks, Trail Ways, Recreation
Corridors, and Protected Areas (OSP)
beyond which are Urban Low Medium
Residential 2-3 dwelling units per acre
(ULM), Community Facility Elementary
School K-6 (CF-E).

Planned Development
(PD)
Planned Unit Development 115 (PUD
115)
Altamont Creek beyond which are
single-family residential (Maralisa),
Altamont Creek Elementary School,
and Altamont Creek Neighborhood
Park
East
Parks, Trail Ways, Recreation
Corridors, and Protected Areas (OSP),
Urban Low Residential 1.5-2 units per
acre (UL-2), and Urban Medium
Residential 4.5-6 dwelling units per
acre (UM).

Planned Development (PD) –
Planned Unit Development 53-93,
Planned Unit Development 105, and
Planned Unit Development 66-94
(PUD 53-93, PUD 105, and PUD 66-
94)
Open space and single-family
residential
West Parks, Trail Ways, Recreation
Corridors, and Protected Areas (OSP).

Planned Unit Development 115 (PUD
115)
Garaventa Wetlands Preserve,
Altamont Creek beyond which are
single-family residential (Maralisa)
and Vasco Road.

Subject
Site
Urban Low Residential 1-1.5 dwelling
units per acre (UL-1)
Planned Unit Development 115 (PUD
115) Vacant grassland
7 ATTACHMENT 3
386
6 STAFF ANALYSIS
General Plan
The site’s General Plan land use designation is Urban Low Residential (UL-1), at 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre. Consistent with the UL-1 land use designation, the proposal’s average density is approximately 1.38 units per acre.

The General Plan Land Use and Community Character Elements include the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies for new development projects within the City of Livermore:

Goal LU-1 Protect the unique qualities of Livermore, which include a historic Downtown, a variety of residential
neighborhoods, vineyards, ranches, natural habitats and open space.

Objective
LU-1.1 Locate new development so as to create a consolidated pattern of urbanization, maximizing the use of existing public services and facilities.

Policy P1 Except where special circumstances warrant, the City shall allow development only on those properties immediately
adjacent to established urban areas, in accordance with the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary Initiative. (2003 General Plan, P. 3-30).

Policy P4 The City shall encourage the use of the planned development concept where possible to decrease construction costs,
provide open space, increase the variety of housing types and provide integrated very low-, low-, and moderate-income housing.

The Project site is within the North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary and City boundary, adjacent to established residential development served by City utilities, and has a residential General Plan land use designation. The designation of the site in the General Plan as a location for residential development indicates it is part of the City’s planned growth and not intended as non-urbanized land.

Goal CC-1 Preserve and enhance Livermore’s natural setting.

Objective
CC-1.1 Use open space to protect and enhance local community character and identity, to preserve rural characteristics, and to provide an edge to urban growth.
8 ATTACHMENT 3
387
7 Policy P1 The City shall allow no structural development in hillside areas involving skylines, ridgelines, or silhouettes.

Policy P2 The City shall permit no intensive development of the hills.

Development including roads, buildings and other structural or land coverage shall be located, sited and designed to fit and be subordinate to the natural landforms. Under no
circumstances shall development create uniform,
geometrically terraced building sites which are contrary to the natural landforms and which detract, obscure or negatively effect the visual quality of the landforms. (2003 General Plan, P. 4-3).

Goal LU-4 Ensure that new development mitigates significant environmental, design, and infrastructure impacts.

Objective
LU-4.1 Prevent development from occurring where the location or the physical or biological characteristics of the site would make the land use inappropriate.

Policy P1 Impacts to wetland and biological resources shall be calculated on a gross acreage basis and shall include areas of steep slopes, streets, floodways, and parks dedications that could result in losses of wildlife and plant habitat on a parcel.

Policy P2 The City shall encourage the clustering of development in order to minimize its overall footprint in areas of ecological sensitivity, such as hillsides, alkali springs, creek corridors, and watersheds.

The development plan responds to the natural forms and topography of the site. For example, the Project’s single public road and maintenance vehicle access road loops around the western knoll and follows the site’s contours along the saddle between both knolls, enabling construction of the road and homes at elevations similar to the existing Altamont Creek development to the east. Clustering homes along the roadway minimizes the development footprint and enables the preservation of the rock outcrop in the northwest corner, both knolls, and the provision of the natural buffers from 47 feet wide to over 100 feet wide around the site’s perimeter.

The Project follows a development pattern common to nearby residential development that clusters development in order to avoid natural resources and site constraints. The development pattern for the Altamont Creek subdivision to the southeast that includes Bear Creek Drive, Knoll Way and Court, Edgewater Lane, and Bridle Path Court preserves the on-site knoll on the northwest edge of the project site, avoids seasonal wetlands, and includes structure exclusion zones due to seismic constraints. Similarly, 9 ATTACHMENT 3
388
8 development along Meadow Glen Drive directly east of the Project also avoids seasonal wetlands and includes structure exclusion zones in response to seismic constraints. The Saddleback development, approximately one-half-mile to the northwest of the Project, at the northeast corner of Ames Street and Dalton Avenue, avoids seasonal wetlands and preserves on-site knolls (Attachment 6).

Environmental mitigation proposed for the project will include the permanent preservation, monitoring and management of an 85-acre parcel in the Springtown Alkali Sink. The mitigation parcel is located north of Scenic Avenue between Bluebell Avenue and Broadmoor Avenue (Attachment 7). The highly sensitive property contains a number of important natural resources including a section of Altamont Creek and a portion of a unique alkali-saline wetland habitat. The federally protected Palmate Bracted Bird’s Beak is also present on the property.

Environmental permits from appropriate Resource Agencies will require the following components to ensure protection of the mitigation property in perpetuity:
• Permanent conservation easement held by a non-profit trust or other organization approved by the Resource Agencies to hold easements,
• A long-term management plan that includes an annual maintenance and monitoring cost calculation, and
• A non-wasting endowment to fund the long-term management and monitoring consistent with the long-term management plan.

The City owns approximately 300 acres north and immediately adjacent to the 85-acre mitigation property. City staff is working with a consultant and Resource Agencies to establish a mitigation bank on the City-owned properties. Establishment of a conservation and/or mitigation bank on the City’s properties would facilitate restoration and permanent preservation. Establishment of the mitigation bank also requires placing the properties under a permanent conservation easement with a long-term management plan and endowment to fund monitoring and maintenance.

Consistent with the City’s General Plan and City Council priorities, the City continues to seek opportunities to acquire open space, in fee and easement, for habitat and agricultural preservation. The City pursues properties with General Plan Open Space land use designations that are beyond the City’s urban growth boundaries. Acquiring such properties for permanent open space stabilizes land use and strategically secures the urban growth boundaries. Since 2008, the City and partners such as the East Bay Regional Park District and Tri-Valley Conservancy have acquired over 1,000 acres for open space and trails with nearly $6 million coming from City funding sources.

Zoning
The Project site’s current Zoning Classification is Planned Unit Development 115 (PUD 115). The following table summarizes the Project’s conformance with major development standards for the detached units.
10 ATTACHMENT 3
389
9 Standard (Detached Units) Zoning Requirement
(Detached Units)
Proposed (Detached
Units)
Building Height (Maximum) 35 ft. 26 ft., 2 in. (Maximum) Front Yard (Minimum) 15 ft. (20 ft. for garage) 15 ft. (20 ft. for garage) (Minimum)
Side Yard (Minimum) 10 ft. (24 ft. total, with 12
ft. for side yard adjacent
to driveway)
10 ft. (24 ft. total, with
12 ft. for side yard
adjacent to driveway)
(Minimum)
Rear Yard Minimum of 25 ft.,
average of 35 ft.

Minimum of 25 ft.,
average of 35 ft.

Floor Area Ratio (Maximum) 35% (excluding up to
600 sq. ft. of garage
area)
34% (Maximum)
Lot Area (Minimum) 7,000 sq. ft. 8,712 sq. ft. (Minimum) Automobile Parking Stalls (Minimum) 2 garage spaces 2 garage spaces (Minimum)
The following table summarizes the Project’s conformance with major development standards for the six attached duet units.

Standard (Attached Units) Zoning Requirement
(Attached Units)
Proposed (Attached
Units)
Building Height (Maximum) 35 ft. 25 ft., 2 in. (Maximum) Front Yard (Minimum) 15 ft. (20 ft. for garage) 15 ft. (20 ft. for garage) (Minimum)
Side Yard (Minimum) One side 15 ft., the
other side zero ft.

One side 15 ft., the
other side zero ft.
(Minimum)
Rear Yard (Minimum) 30 ft. 30 ft. (Minimum)
Lot Coverage (Maximum) 30% 27.1% (Maximum)
Lot Area (Minimum) 2,500 sq. ft. 4,369 sq. ft. (Minimum) Automobile Parking Stalls (Minimum) 2 garage spaces 2 garage spaces (Minimum)
11 ATTACHMENT 3
390
10 In summary, the Project is consistent with all applicable development standards.

Housing Implementation Program
The applicant is requesting housing allocations that are necessary to develop the property under the City’s 2017-2019 Housing Implementation Program (HIP). The allocations would occur upon the City Council’s approval of the Subdivision Map. The allocations would come from the pool of 50 units available per year in the General Plan area, which are allocated on a first-come-first-serve basis. There have not been any units allocated this year. The Planning Commission will make its review of the subdivision and an affirmative recommendation on the map carries with it an affirmative recommendation of the housing allocations.

Inclusionary Housing
The General Plan Housing Element has the goal of providing housing affordable to all economic segments of the community. The City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires 15 percent of the dwelling units in the proposed project to be affordable to low and moderate income households, or satisfy this requirement by an alternative means subject to City Council approval.

The affordable housing obligation for the project is 6.15 units (15 percent of proposed units). Consistent with these provisions, and with the support of staff, the applicant proposes to satisfy its affordable housing obligation by: (1) satisfying three of the required affordable units in the project by constructing three (3) duet floorplans on lots 26, 28, and 35, which will provide six (6) attached units for sale to low and moderate income buyers in accordance with the City’s program, therefore satisfying the equivalency practice previously approved by City Council for developers proposing alternative affordable unit plans, and, (2) paying in cash the equivalent value of what the City would otherwise receive for the remaining 3.15 affordable units in the development to satisfy the remainder of the requirement. The value of the 3.15 inclusionary promissory notes and resulting cash payment is to be calculated and paid no later than the time of the 30th building permit application. This method of satisfying the affordable housing requirement, i.e., providing affordable duet units in a single family residential development, was approved for the Ponderosa Vinsanto II subdivision (at the Orchid Ranch site) and the Grove subdivision off Mines Road.

City Council authorization is required to allow the Applicant to provide anything other than on-site units as a means to satisfy the affordable housing obligation. Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend the City Council authorize the Applicant to provide duet units as proposed by the applicant and to make an equivalent cash payment to satisfy a portion of the affordable housing obligation.

The details of the affordable housing provision will be subject to City Council approval of a Housing Agreement before adoption of the final map.
12 ATTACHMENT 3
391
11 Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8094 – Subdivision 13-001 Consistent with the General Plan density allowing 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre, the Subdivision Map (Vesting Tentative Tract Map 8094) shows 38 lots for detached singlefamily homes and six lots for attached single-family homes, covering approximately 9.4 acres (29.5 percent of the total site). The average lot size is approximately 9,400 square feet, which is comparable to the Altamont Creek development to the east and slightly less than the Bluff’s further to the north, off of Laughlin Road.

Grading: Project grading balances cut and fill on-site. The Project avoids grading the rock outcrop on the northwest corner and the tops of the on-site knolls, preserving their natural landform and shape to the maximum extent possible. The development plans do not indicate the colors and material for the retaining walls. Staff recommends the applicant install retaining walls that are clad in stone that matches the texture and color of the stones found at the rock outcrop and throughout the site.

Recommended Condition: Applicant shall install retaining walls that are clad in stone that matches the texture and color of the stones found at the rock outcrop and throughout the site for review and approval by the Community Development Department.

Utilities and Infrastructure: Sanitary sewer and water utilities are stubbed to the west end of Bear Creek Drive and appropriately sized to accommodate development of the Project.

Storm drain and public street infrastructure (street, curb, gutter, sidewalk) are also in place at the west end of Bear Creek Road and are available for connection to the Project.

Trails and Open Space: Informal paths from Bear Creek Drive, Knoll Court, the Zone 7 maintenance road on the Project’s southern boundary, and the public trail on the south side of Altamont Creek traverse the Project site, the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve, and privately owned lands to the north. The Project preserves the on-site knolls, informal paths, and rock outcrop in the northwest corner of the site. All of these on-site features, which currently exist on private property, will be formally accessible to the public with development of the project.

The Project includes an emergency vehicle access (EVA), pedestrian, and bicycle-only bridge connection to Hawk Street. The Project will also provide a formal pedestrian/bicycle connection from the southeast corner of the site to the improved trail west of Black Oak Court. A connection at this location will enable residents in the new neighborhood to directly access the existing bridge over Altamont Creek located south of Black Oak Court.

The City has a Recreational Use License Agreement with Zone 7 that covers Altamont Creek and the adjacent flood plain. The License Agreement enables the City to utilize the area for recreation and park purposes, including trails. The City, Park District, and the applicant will continue to coordinate design and location of fences, gates and trails with Zone 7. Final design is subject to coordination between the applicant, City, Park District, and Zone 7.
13 ATTACHMENT 3
392
12 Recommended Condition: Design of the pedestrian/bicycle connection from the southeast corner of the site to the improved trail west of Black Oak Court is subject to review by the Community Development Department, in coordination with the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District and Zone 7, upon submittal for building permits from the Livermore Building Division.

Parking: Each home has a two- or three-car garage, which exceeds the Livermore Development Code requirement for two parking spaces per unit. On-street parking will also be available on both sides of the residential street where it does not interfere with vehicular site distance and turning movements for emergency vehicles.

Solid Waste Collection: Each lot will have sufficient space in side yards or the garage for waste bins (trash, recycling, and organics). There is sufficient room on the street frontages for placing the carts out for collection by Livermore Sanitation.

Livermore Area Recreation and Park District
Staff from the City and the Park District met on June 18, 2014, to discuss the District’s comments and concerns regarding the Project’s close proximity to the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve. Concerns include the potential impacts to hydrology and soil conditions within the Preserve, selecting appropriate transitional landscaping in the natural buffer between the Preserve and the Project, and controlling damage to habitat and wildlife from trespass and dogs off-leash.

The applicant and environmental consultant from LSA Associates met with Park District staff on February 12, 2015. The applicant, City and Park District staff met again on July 29, 2015. The purpose of the meetings was to fully understand the District’s concerns and identify measures to address those concerns. The Park District reiterated concerns regarding potential impacts to the Preserve from suburban stormwater runoff, threats to burrowing owl habitat, controlling trespass, and long-term buffer area maintenance. The following revisions were made to the Project, prior to the August 8, 2015 Planning Commission meeting, to address the Park District’s concerns, or are included in the Conditions of Approval, as necessary:
• Installation of subdrains along the perimeter of the project to intercept any subsurface runoff from irrigation, swimming pools and other suburban sources.

Subdrains will convey any remaining runoff to the treatment basin. Overland flow during heavy rainfall will continue to flow from the natural areas toward the Preserve.
• Installation of exclusion fencing along the rear property lines of the new lots and perimeter fencing around the property boundary. Exclusion fencing shall include a solid barrier along the bottom to prevent amphibians (California tiger salamanders and California red-legged frogs) from dispersing into the development. Perimeter fencing will control access and reduce trespass onto the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve, Zone 7 flood protection areas, and sensitive wetlands to the north, while 14 ATTACHMENT 3
393
13 maintaining existing wildlife movement. Exclusion and perimeter fencing design will be coordinated with the applicant, City, Park District, and Resource Agencies during the subsequent federal and State environmental permitting process.

Recommended Condition: Perimeter fencing shall be designed to control access and reduce trespass onto the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve, Zone 7 flood protection areas, and sensitive wetlands to the north, while maintaining existing wildlife movement. Perimeter fencing shall extend from the side property lines of Lots 1, 10 and 11. Under-crossings for wildlife shall be considered. Final design of the perimeter fence is subject to Community Development Department approval after coordination between the applicant, City, Park District and appropriate Resource Agencies.

Recommended Condition: Exclusion fencing along the rear lot lines of lots 1 – 25 shall include design features to exclude small amphibians (California tiger salamander and California red-legged frog) from the residential development. The base of the fence shall be placed on a minimum 12” tall concrete wall, to serve as a barrier, and the bottom of the fence should include a 12” solid board to further act as a barrier. Final design of the exclusion fence is subject to Community Development Department approval after coordination between the applicant, City, Park District and appropriate Resource Agencies.
• Installation of signs with content and locations coordinated with the applicant, City, Park District, and Resource Agencies to raise public awareness of private properties and sensitive resources within the Preserve and lands to the north.

Recommended Condition: Design and location of signs to raise public awareness of sensitive resources within the Preserve and lands to the north is subject to review and approval by the City of Livermore Community Development Department, after coordination with the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District, and applicable Resource Agencies, prior to submittal for building permits.
• Elimination of landscape planting in the natural buffers to return them to their predevelopment condition and eliminate perching for diurnal raptor species that prey on burrowing owls and compete for burrowing owl prey.

Recommended Condition: The landscape plans shall not propose trees or plants within the fenced buffer zone between the back fences of the residential properties and the boundary of the preserve, to eliminate all perching and nesting opportunities along the project edges for Burrowing owl predators.
• The Park District is developing a Grasslands Management Plan to establish nearand long-term management practices for the Preserve. The applicant, City and 15 ATTACHMENT 3
394
14 Park District staff will coordinate development of the management plan for the Project’s buffer areas and knolls to be consistent with the Park District’s Grassland Management Plan.

Recommended Condition: Provide a Grasslands Management Plan for the Project’s buffer areas and knolls. Coordinate development of the management plan with the City of Livermore and Livermore Area Recreation and Park District in order to synchronize management with the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve under the Park District’s Grassland Management Plan.

The Park District has reiterated the need for the project to address the above, in comments provided to the City for the most recent iteration of the Project.

Site Plan Design Review
The Project is consistent with the City’s Design Standard and Guidelines that promote appropriate site planning, high quality architecture, and landscape design that contribute positively to the neighborhood’s residential character. The following discussion highlights some of the key Design Standards and Guidelines that apply to the Project.

Building Siting and Orientation: The Design Standards and Guidelines regarding building siting and orientation guide development toward responding to Livermore’s environmental, geographic and topographic conditions and include the following guidelines:

1.1 Natural Site Features Guidelines

1.1.1 Residential layout should preserve existing natural site features such as topography, views and vegetation to enhance the character of the development.

Public views of such features should be preserved and incorporated into development proposals.

1.2 Topography Guidelines

1.2.2 In hillside or sloping areas, street and building placement should follow contours rather than being placed at right angles to the prevailing slope.

1.2.3 On sloping sites, staggering placement of units along opposite sides of the street, rather than siting lots directly opposite one another, can provide better preservation of views.

The roadway and homes generally follow the site’s 550 to 570 foot contours enabling the preservation of the on-site knolls and provision of deep, natural buffers along the south, west, and north edges of the Project. Preservation of the southeastern on-site knoll buffers the southeastern edge of the project in combination with the existing knoll and 16 ATTACHMENT 3
395
15 open space preserved during development of the Altamont Creek subdivision to the east.

The site plan staggers the homes along opposite sides of the street and will provide opportunities for better views from the Project’s public streets.

Neighborhood Identity: The intent of the Neighborhood Identity guidelines is to ensure residential development reinforces a strong community-oriented identity:

2.1 Neighborhood Context

2.1.1 New residential development should provide variety in the City’s residential development character than currently exists.

2.1.2 New development should not be so different in character that it is visually incompatible with existing development.

2.1.4 Building design should complement surrounding development.

The proposed project provides greater variety in the proposed housing stock than previous iterations, in terms of architecture, colors, and materials, The Project’s design themes reflect modern interpretations of Spanish and Villa styles, which appropriately distinguish the new neighborhood from the Altamont Creek development’s interpretation of Farmhouse, Cottage and Craftsman styles and provides variety to the City’s residential development character. Complementary to neighboring residential development, the project also provides a Farmhouse elevation style and utilizes a variety of materials and design variations to promote a high-quality character and appearance. Project lot and home sizes are larger than those found in the Altamont Creek development to the east, but comparable to the Bluff’s development to the northeast off of Laughlin Road.

Open Space: The intent of the Open Space guidelines is to ensure that community outdoor components of residential development are aesthetically pleasing and promote great outdoor activity:

3.1 General Open Space

3.1.1 Neighborhood open space should be located to maximize its visual and functional benefits.

3.1.2 Common open space areas should be sited to take advantage of any views out from the site and help preserve views to significant architectural and landscape features within the site.

The central location of the on-site knolls and the natural buffers around the edges of the Project maximizes visual and functional benefits to the new neighborhood and the public.

The knolls will be publicly accessible and offer views of Brushy Peak and the ridgelines beyond.
17 ATTACHMENT 3
396
16 Views and Visual Access: The intent is to ensure that views that are unique and specific to Livermore are preserved from the public areas of residential development.

4.1 Views

4.1.1 Views to the hillsides that surround the City are an important visual resource that should be incorporated into the design of a project.

4.1.2 Views from streets and public areas within the project should be considered a community resource and should be preserved and enhanced through sensitive site design.

4.1.3 Buildings and landscaping should not block public views.

4.1.4 Proper placement of structures can be used to focus and frame significant views and screen out elements that are visually less appealing.

4.1.6 Preserving views of surrounding open space and hillsides from open space areas within the project will expand the sense of openness, enhance the visual character of the space, and facilitate greater use of the open space.

Siting the homes along the curved roadway that follows the site contours and staggering placement so they are not directly opposite of each other maximizes public and private views out from the Project to Brushy Peak and open space to the north and west. The site plan also maintains portions of the views of the knolls from Altamont Creek Park by placing homes west of the Park boundary and avoiding the southeastern knoll.

All of the proposed houses are well under the 35-foot maximum height limit. Minimizing building heights facilitates views off-site from the project, and maximizes views of the onsite knolls from neighboring properties. The existing knolls on the Project site obstruct views of Brushy Peak from Altamont Creek Park and Altamont Creek Elementary School.

The Project will not obstruct views of Brushy Peak and the distant hills to the north from the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve. Ridgelines adjacent to Frick Lake, approximately three-quarters of a mile east of the Project, will backdrop views of the Project from Vasco Road so that new homes will not silhouette against the sky.

In addition to controlling access and trespass, fences play a significant role in minimizing visual prominence from off-site perspectives. The Conditions of Approval require open view fencing with dark colored materials, to minimize visual prominence, for perimeter fencing and all fencing along rear property lines. Final design is subject to coordination between the applicant, City, Park District and appropriate Resource Agencies.

Recommended Condition: Perimeter fencing and all fencing along rear property lines shall be open view fencing with dark colored materials, to minimize visual prominence. Chain link fencing shall be prohibited. Final design of the fences is 18 ATTACHMENT 3
397
17 subject to Community Development Department approval after coordination between the applicant, City, Park District and appropriate Resource Agencies.

Staff is recommending additional conditions to enhance the streetscape and minimize the visual prominence of the development from off-site perspectives.

Recommended Condition: Interior residential fences shall match the redwood “good neighbor fence” shown on Sheet PD-5.

Recommended Condition: Shorten the length of the fences along the common area boundaries of Lots 1, 10, 11, 25, 26 (A & B), 34, 35 (A & B) and 41 so that they do not exceed more than 50 percent of the lot depth in order to enhance the streetscape and deemphasize the fence in these prominent locations.

Recommended Condition: Set all fences between the house and side property lines at least 10 feet back from the front wall of the house, not counting porches, in order to enhance the streetscape by revealing more of the homes and deemphasizing the presence of fencing.

Massing and Scale: Massing and scale guidelines promote residential development with a pedestrian scale:

1.1.1 Building massing should be varied by employing a variety of techniques, such as recessed porches, bay windows, dormers and varying planes or setbacks. As appropriate to the style of the house, the roof forms should be varied. Roof forms to be employed include: hipped roofs, gabled roofs, varying roof pitches, side-to-side gables, front-to-back gables or various combinations.

1.1.2 Façade components should correspond to the scale of the human form. This is accomplished by visually breaking up façades into smaller components with elements such as windows, wall insets, balconies, ledges and trim and by stepping back upper stories.

1.1.3 Façade components should be in proportion to related components, such as the proportion of a column to its base and the width of a column to its height.

General massing and scale of the homes reinforce a pedestrian level design through the provision of projecting and integral porches with decorative iron railings, garages on separate wall planes from porches and front wall planes of homes, and a variety of roof forms.

Architectural Style: Architectural style standard and guidelines ensure the residential design contributes to the overall character of Livermore.

2.1.1 Building design should not be limited to any particular style. However, it should generally be compatible with surrounding residential development. The 19 ATTACHMENT 3
398
18 authentic implementation of appropriate established architectural styles is encouraged.

2.1.2 Functional design solutions should be employed that are compatible with the surrounding natural and built environments and that contribute to the character and quality of new residential development.

2.1.3 Building elevations should not be replicated across the street from each other or on adjacent parcels.

The Project features five floor plans in a modern Spanish, Villa, and Farmhouse architectural styles that are consistent with the City’s Design Standards and Guidelines:
• Plan 1 – One story, detached, four bedroom/two and one-half baths, two-car garage, 2,390 square feet (not including garage square footage). • Plan 2 – Two story, detached, four bedroom/three and one-half baths, two-car garage, 2,830 square feet (not including garage square footage). • Plan 3 – Two story, detached, four bedrooms/three and one-half baths, library, two-car garage, 2,940 square feet (not including garage square footage). • Plan 4 – Two-story, detached, four bedrooms/three and one-half baths, office, twocar garage, one-car compact garage, 3,150 square feet (not including garage square footage).
• Plan 5 – Unit A: Two-story, attached, four bedrooms/two and one-half baths, twocar garage, 1,692 square feet; Unit B: Two-story, attached, three bedrooms/two and one-half baths, two-car garage, 1,379 square feet (not including garage square footage).

Plans 1 through 4 have three variations in architectural style (Spanish, Villa, and Farmhouse), while Plan 5 has two (Spanish and Farmhouse). Additionally, each architectural style is supported by three optional color/material schemes. The variety of floor plans, architectural style variations, and color schemes contributes visual interest to the streetscape and facilitates the placement of different floor plans across the street from each other. Large projecting porches and porches integral to the same massing and roof form as the main structure provide usable outdoor space, activate the streetscape, and enhance the pedestrian scale of each home.

Architectural design is also consistent with the Design Standard and Guidelines for façades, windows and doors, porches, materials, colors, and roof design:
• Façades include entries and porches that relate to the human scale. • Windows and doors employ design details that are appropriate to the architectural style and add relief to the wall surface.
• Porches provide functional outdoor space and provide a transition between the street and residence.
• Elevations include natural stone finishes appropriate to the architectural style and design.
20 ATTACHMENT 3
399
19 • Colors are earth tone and compatible with the natural setting. (Color and material boards will be available at the public meeting.)
• Roof form, color and texture are integral parts of the home designs and compatible with the natural setting.

The three (3) duet buildings are evenly dispersed throughout the development, and the project’s corner lot locations are utilized to allow the duet units’ front doors and garage doors to be located on separate frontages. This helps convey the appearance of single detached units for each of the duet buildings. Also, the use of the same roof and exterior wall materials for each duet unit contributes to the appearance of a single detached unit.

The design of the duet buildings has achieved design parity with the detached units, including achieving comparable massing to the two-story detached units.

Landscape Design: The Design Standards and Guidelines require development plans to contribute positively to the character of residential neighborhoods.

1.1 Function

1.1.1 Landscaping should be an integral part of the overall site design, rather than camouflage unused or unusable spaces or poor architectural design.

1.1.2 Landscape improvements should be utilized to better integrate a development with its setting.

The landscape plans show a small orchard grid of Swan Hill olive trees that signal the entry into the development followed by informal clusters of oak trees (Valley oak and Southern live oak) along the base of the knolls. Street trees are London Planes that distinguish arrival into the developed portion of the neighborhood. Crape Myrtle’s accent trail and sidewalk entries and crossings. The landscape plan demonstrates an orderly design that integrates with the overall development, consistent with the Design Standards and Guidelines.

1.2 Existing Landscape Elements

1.2.1 Where feasible, significant existing landscape elements should be preserved and incorporated into development and landscape plans.

1.2.2 Elements such as mature trees, tree groupings, arroyos and rock outcroppings should be considered in the design of the project.

The proposal preserves the rock outcropping in the northwest corner that will be publicly accessible. Stone seats and benches at the rock outcropping will provide a respite opportunity to trail users and residents. In response to the Park District’s concerns with providing trees in the natural buffers that could provide perching and nesting for raptors that prey on Burrowing owls, the landscape plans shall not include trees in these areas. 21 ATTACHMENT 3
400
20 Recommended Condition: The landscape plans shall not propose trees or plants within the fenced buffer zone between the back fences of the residential properties and the boundary of the preserve, to eliminate all perching and nesting opportunities along the project edges for Burrowing Owl predators.

Staff is recommending the applicant provide native shrubs in the northeast portion of the buffer along the rear property lines of Lots 19, 20 and 21 in order to soften the visual appearance of the retaining walls.

Recommended Condition: Provide native shrubs in the northeast portion of the buffer along the rear property lines of Lots 19, 20 and 21 in order to soften the visual prominence of the retaining walls.

1.3 Plant Species

1.3.1 Employ a well-coordinated palette of plant species.

1.3.2 Native plant materials and other plant species that are well adapted to local climatic conditions are preferable.

Preliminary calculations provided in the landscape plans show the project will comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Prototypical front yard landscaping shown on Sheets PD-9.1 and PD-9.2 minimizes turf, and includes native species that are well adapted for low water use.

1.4 Plant Size and Scale

1.4.1 Larger, more mature plant materials shall be used as much as possible to ensure that some immediate effect on the project’s appearance will be attained within two years of planting:

Street trees and front yard trees are 24-inch box, while shrubs range in size from one to 15 gallon with spacing for successful establishment. The prototypical front yard landscaping arranges plant species and sizes in a hierarchy that appropriately accents the homes and functional entry paths leading from the sidewalks to the front entries.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder (together “CEQA”) require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to be prepared for any project which may have a significant impact on the environment. An EIR is an informational document, the purposes of which, according to CEQA are “to provide public agencies and the public in general with detailed information about the effect which a proposed project is likely to have on the environment; to list ways in which the significant 22 ATTACHMENT 3
401
21 effects of such a project might be minimized; and to indicate alternatives to such a project.” The information contained in the project EIR is intended to be objective and impartial, and to enable the reader to arrive at an independent judgment regarding the significance of the impacts resulting from the proposed project.

A 2018 Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report, together with the Draft EIR published in November 2012 and the Final EIR published in June 2014 (State Clearinghouse Number 2011112045), will be considered for compliance with the provisions of CEQA.

The 2012 Draft EIR includes two alternatives to the original proposal: Alternative A: No Project, No Development Alternative; and Alternative B: Reduced Density, Current General Plan Allowance Alternative. Alternative A assumes no development of the site.

Alternative B assumes development of the site consistent with the current General Plan designation of Urban Low Density (UL-1) at 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre. After considering public comments on the Draft EIR and the statements given by neighboring homeowners at a number of Planning Commission and City Council meetings, the applicant chose to proceed with developing the site generally consistent with Alternative B.

The Draft EIR identifies the No Project, No Development Alternative as the environmentally superior alternative since it proposes no changes to the site. However, this alternative would not advance any project objectives, including the contribution of homes to accommodate Livermore’s growing population and regional housing needs, and to provide housing near Tri-Valley employment centers within the existing City Boundary and North Livermore Urban Growth Boundary. The Reduced Density, Current General Plan Allowance Alternative is the next most environmentally superior alternative and would meet all of the Project Objectives.

The 2018 Re-Issued Final EIR contains an assessment of the 2018 Revised Project in Chapter 26. The responses to comments were reassessed in light of the 2018 Revised Project and revisions to the responses are provided as appropriate in Chapter 27. None of the revisions or other information contained in this Re-Issued Final EIR would be considered “significant new information” under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and therefore no recirculation of the Draft EIR is required.

The 2018 Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report, together with the Draft EIR published in November 2012, and the Final EIR published in June 2014 shall constitute the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The EIR includes a list of mitigation measures that would reduce certain environmental impacts to a less-than-significant level. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared, which lists each mitigation measure, the method of verification, the timing of verification, and the agency responsible for verifying the implementation of the mitigation measure. Staff recommends including the implementation of the mitigation measures as a condition of approval for the Subdivision and Site Plan Design Review applications.
23 ATTACHMENT 3
402
22 Recommended Condition: The project shall be subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Environmental Impact Report.

With the implementation of the mitigation measures as a condition of approval, the project will not have a significant impact on the environment.

Public Comments
On August 23, 2018, Staff held a community meeting for the public to learn about the site’s land use regulations and the proposed development, ask questions, and provide feedback. The list below summarizes the most frequently raised concerns expressed at the meeting and in emails to City staff:

1. Biological Resources
Comments: Concerns include the elimination of habitat for sensitive animal and plant species.

Response: The Draft EIR acknowledges the permanent loss of up to 31.7 acres of non-native annual grassland that has the potential to support several special status animal species including; California tiger salamander, California red-legged frog, vernal pool fairy shrimp, San Joaquin kit fox, western spadefoot toad, California burrowing owl, and American badger. Any disturbance of federal and State protected animal and plant species requires environmental permits from federal and State resource agencies, including the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish & Wildlife. Typically, environmental permits from these Resource Agencies require habitat loss compensation in the form of habitat acquisition at 3:1 ratios (acres preserved: acres disturbed) Proposed environmental mitigation for the Project is to place an 85-acre property in the Springtown Alkali Sink, also owned by the Garaventa family, under a permanent conservation easement with an endowment for restoration and management in perpetuity. The property is referenced in a letter of support for the project, submitted by the property owners on September 13, 2018 (Attachment 8).

The 85-acre property has sensitive soils, special status animal and plant species, vernal pools, and a segment of Altamont Creek. The environmental mitigation will be coordinated with the Resource Agencies during subsequent environmental permitting.

The site is within the area covered by the East Alameda County Conservation Strategy (Conservation Strategy), a guidance document for regional conservation, and environmental permitting for private and public development projects. The ReIssued Final EIR includes mitigation measures that require the applicant to acquire offsite compensatory habitat consistent with compensation ratios under the Conservation Strategy. Additional mitigation measures include pre-construction 24 ATTACHMENT 3
403
23 surveys to ensure species are absent from the site before construction begins, and protection measures to be taken during construction to ensure species do not migrate onto the site.

2. Visual Prominence and Views
Comments: Concerns are primarily with the Project’s visual prominence from existing residences in the neighborhoods to the south, east and northeast.

Response: One of Livermore’s most distinctive features are the hills and ridgelines that surround the City, most of which lie outside the City limits. Significant ridgelines located north of the I-580 corridor include Brushy Peak to the northeast, as well as the Altamont Hills east of Vasco and Greenville Roads. Other open space to the north consists of more moderate topography, with rolling hills and rangelands. Livermore’s built environment, and its planning policies, are designed to preserve views to these hills from public vantage points.

The General Plan Community Character Element includes Goals, Objectives and Policies to preserve views of Livermore’s surrounding hillsides and ridgelines, particularly from I-580. The Project does not substantially alter views of identified scenic resources from identified vistas and would not substantially change views toward these scenic resources from nearby public areas.

Parks are considered public locations from which views are important. The existing views from Altamont Creek Park are currently obstructed by the Project site and do not include views toward Brushy Peak and the ridgelines beyond. The Project maintains portions of the views of the on-site knolls from Altamont Creek Park by placing homes over 500 feet west of the Project entry and avoiding the southeastern knoll.

The Applicant has provided visual simulations (contained in development plans) that show the project in context from several vantage points:
• Altamont Creek Park, looking north,
• Existing terminus of Bear Creek Drive, looking northwest, • North of Knoll Court, looking west,
• Vasco Road, looking east,
• Existing terminus of Hawk Street, looking northeast.

The visibility of a project from private properties is not intrinsically a significant environmental impact. Further, private views are not considered protected under CEQA nor would changes to these be considered an impact to the environment.

As demonstrated in the Re-Issued Final EIR, the Project was found not to significantly alter views of identified scenic resources from identified scenic vistas.

The Project is consistent with the character of adjacent residential neighborhoods 25 ATTACHMENT 3
404
24 to the south and east and therefore has only less than significant environmental impacts related to views.

Additional public comments were received by the Planning Division on November 28, 2018 (Attachment 10).

SUMMARY
The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning, comparable in development pattern to surrounding neighborhood, including the Altamont Creek and Bluff’s developments to the east and northeast, and provides public access to the on-site knolls and rock outcrop that currently are privately owned.

The 2018 Re-Issued Final EIR indicates that the site could be developed without significant impacts to the environment and can support this infill development at a density envisioned under the current 2003 General Plan Urban Low Residential designation, at 1 to 1.5 dwelling units per acre.

All of the required findings for approving the Tentative Tract Map and Site Plan Design Review can be made (see the attached Resolution, Attachment 1). Therefore, staff recommends approval of the project, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending the City Council:

1. certify the Environmental Impact Report and, after approval of the application, instruct staff to file the Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk;

2. approve Subdivision 13-001 (Tentative Tract Map 8094), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval;

3. approve Site Plan Design Review 13-005, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and

4. authorize the Applicant to provide six duet units as proposed and to make a cash payment equivalent to 3.15 affordable units to satisfy the affordable housing obligation.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution of Approval

2. Conditions of Approval

3. Development Plans

4. 1990 Maralisa Project Development Plan

5. 2000 Maralisa Summit Development Plan

6. Similar Development Patterns in Northeast Livermore

7. Proposed Mitigation Parcel
26 ATTACHMENT 3
405
25 8. Letter from Property Owners

9. City Council Resolution No. 2015-127

10. Public Comments

11. Colors and materials boards will be available at the hearing. 27 ATTACHMENT 3
406
Garaventa Hills Site
ATTACHMENT 4
ATTACHMENT 3
407
ATTACHMENT 5
ATTACHMENT 3
408
Altamont Creek Subdivision
Garaventa Hills Site
Three Knolls
The Bluffs
Wetlands
Subdivision
Similar Development Patterns – The Bluff’s and Altamont Creek Subdivisions

ATTACHMENT
6 ATTACHMENT 3
409
Saddleback Subdivision
Knolls
Wetlands
Similar Development Patterns – The Saddleback Subdivision ATTACHMENT 3
410
85- Acre Mitigation Parcel
Mitigation Site
ATTACHMENT 7
ATTACHMENT 3
411
Comments received prior to the meeting tonight:

Michelle Mitchell - We would like the Planning Commission to consider the following in regards to the proposed Garaventa Hill subdivision:

The City changed the zoning for Lassen Road Townhome Project (LRTP) (GPA 18-003, Resolution No. 19-20). We would like to ask that the City utilize this same method to rezone the Garaventa Hill Project site from housing to open space. Cost has been brought up as an issue. Why did the City decide the cost was not an issue for the LRTP project?
The current EIR is over 10 years old. A new, not recycled EIR is needed What is the affect of building a large subdivision so close to the Garaventa Wetlands? How will these homeowners qualify for fire insurance? Many of the homeowners in the area have been dropped, or rates increased, due to the proximity of open space and escape routes.

City owned property behind the homes on Bear Creek and Knoll Ct was meant as a buffer/open space, not public trails. This will drastically infringe on the privacy of many of the neighborhood homes.

If the ultimate outcome is to proceed with the Project, th following needs to be considered:

Due to fire hazard and current open space, limit trees and vegetation to natives Speed bumps on and additional stop signs on Bear Creek
Re-visit Hawk Road or road from Vasco as entrance
John Lindquist - Please accept this email as having been submitted in a timely fashion as instructed before 12PM today, November 12, 2024.

The comments here are in the form of objections, not just as points made for the consideration of the Planning Commission, but also intended to preserve rights to challenge in court the official acts of the commission, Livermore City Council, and other governmental bodies, as well as the Project owners/developers and their assignees/successors
With regards to all of the several EIRs listed on the Public Notice postmarked October 31, 2024, and under consideration:
• that none of the traffic impact studies accurately analyzed the impact of road noise in the Project Area that includes existing residents of Bear Creek Drive, nor accurately predicted total number of daily trips, or analyzed the increased potential for vehicle/vehicle, vehicle/animal or vehicle/pedestrian collisions/accidents. -that none of the EIRs accurately captured the extent of earthworks and on and off-site dirt relocation and removal, including but not limited to, the assessment of the potential for the introduction of soil pathogens such as spores, fungi, bacteria and virii, onto and around the ATTACHMENT 4
412
Project Area, that may affect the health and safety of residents in the path of aerosols, that may cause diseases that affect humans or domestic animals. The Project area had several soil cores performed for Geological assay but was never tested for the presence of these pathogens at the depth below grade of the proposed earthworks. -That none of the EIRs accounted for the existence of the attractive nuisance of the current informal and unauthorized public access "trails" on the Project Site at the terminus of Bear Creek Drive, and westerly of the terminus, including but not limited to noise, pollution, litter, vandalism, loitering, drug and alcohol use, illegal use of fireworks, motor vehicles, and open flame in grassland areas, invasion of privacy, disturbance of the peace, unauthorized or unlawful flight and other violations of the Livermore Municipal Code. For example, the Project proposes to formalize and "improve" these current "trails" , and neither past, current, nor future impacts have been considered or analyzed. This increased/improved/formalized trail access is reasonably likely to affects the backing/adjacent properties located at the terminus of Bear Creek Drive and Black Oak Court, but also any non-adjacent properties located on Knoll Court, Knoll Way, and Edgewater Lane, that are located near or adjacent to existing "trails" and pedestrian walkways that will connect to the Project.

The EIRs did not attempt to identify or analyze these impacts or conduct any review of pertinent available records and data maintained by the City of Livermore and other agencies such as calls for service or dispatches made to or around the Project Area associated with these nuisance activities. We believe that mitigation measures such as relocating these elements so that nuisance activities are moved away from existing residences, could be effective.
• The Project Area will also receive some of the same benefits (such as viewscape, maintenance of, and access to public open space and improvements adjacent to, connected to, or containing existing Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts) as well as impose new costs and uses on these common areas, yet there has been no study or, acknowledgement or, or plan to avoid or mitigate these impacts in order to avoid unfair imposition of additional costs, which are already a significant financial burden on a per-parcel basis (LL-811 is paying $635.20 in the 2024-2025 period) - There are at least two tracts similarly situated (Altamont I and Altamont II) comprising at least 123 parcels. The failure to even consider this issue implicates numerous fiduciary duties such as the simple concept of tax fairness, but also adequate planning and full consideration for the impact of new development on existing residents and municipal finances.

ATTACHMENT 4
413
ATTACHMENT 4
414
ATTACHMENT 4
415
You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important From: Planning Web Email
To: Michele Donley
Subject: FW: Planning Commission hearing 11/12/2024
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 5:53:16 PM
From: BERNARD CABANNE
Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission hearing 11/12/2024
Exercise Caution: This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
11/12/2024
Dear Planning Commissioners:

Please postpone the recommendation/resolution to the City Council for certification of the Court ordered Recirculated Environmental Impact Report for the following reasons:

1. The Final DEIR and/or the Reissued Final DEIR still do not adequately address the areas of air quality, hydrology( flooding), and biological resources. There is substantial new information in these areas that the decision-makers -- the Planning Commission, the City Council--- and the public did not have access to. Therefore; we cannot participate in the process and/or make an informed decision in a meaningful manner as required by CEQA and state statues.

2. The minor revisions to biological resources mitigation suggested by Swaim Biological Inc, (SBI) ( Exhibit A) ---are not sufficient to offer adequate protection for the Western Burrowing Owl, the Western spadefoot and the Western pond turtle. The Western Burrowing Owl is a candidate for the Endangered Species List and is afforded the same protection as a listed species. In view of this recent finding, the Court ordered no Project Alternative needs to be further analyzed. Deciding in advance, that minor revisions to biological resources mitigation are sufficient--- is not advisable. Furthermore, the suggested offsite compensatory habitat does nothing for the endangered species and special status species at the site.

Was the USFWS and CDFW given an opportunity to comment on the minor revisions ATTACHMENT 4
416
offered by SBI ? If not, why not?

3. I urge you to modify the recommendation to the City Council allowing the applicant to make a cash payment equivalent to 3.15 affordable units to comply with the affordable housing obligation for the Garaventa Hills Project. Instead, the developer should provide more affordable units within the reduced 47 units.

Please address the above issues and other comments by residents and environmental groups before approving any recommendations to the City Council.

Please include comments in the official record.

Sincerely.

Donna Cabanne
Livermore resident, member of the Center for Biological Diversity, member of the Sierra Club.

ATTACHMENT 4
417
&,7<&281&,/67$))5(3257 ,7(0
'$7(
 $SULO

72  +RQRUDEOH0D\RUDQG&LW\&RXQFLO
)520
 3DXO6SHQFH&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW'LUHFWRU
68%-(&7
 +HDULQJWRFRQVLGHUDUHTXHVWIRUWKHGHYHORSPHQWRIUHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVRQ  DYDFDQWDFUHSDUFHO
*DUDYHQWD+LOOV

5(&200(1'('$&7,21
7KH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQDQGVWDIIUHFRPPHQGWKH&LW\&RXQFLO 
 $GRSWDUHVROXWLRQFHUWLI\LQJWKH(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUWDQGDIWHUDSSURYDORI WKHDSSOLFDWLRQLQVWUXFWLQJVWDIIWRILOHWKH1RWLFHRI'HWHUPLQDWLRQZLWKWKH$ODPHGD &RXQW\&OHUN

 $GRSWDUHVROXWLRQDSSURYLQJ9HVWLQJ7HQWDWLYH7UDFW0DS 
6XEGLYLVLRQ

DQG6LWH3ODQ'HVLJQ5HYLHZ
63'5
DXWKRUL]LQJWKHDOORFDWLRQRI+RXVLQJ
,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3URJUDP
+,3
XQLWVIRUWKHSURMHFWDQGDXWKRUL]LQJWKHDSSOLFDQWWR SURYLGHVL[GXHWXQLWVDVSURSRVHGDQGWRPDNHDFDVKSD\PHQWHTXLYDOHQWWR DIIRUGDEOHXQLWVWRVDWLVI\WKHDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJREOLJDWLRQ 6800$5<
/DIIHUW\&RPPXQLWLHVLVSURSRVLQJDUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWRQDYDFDQWDSSUR[LPDWHO\ DFUHVLWH7KHSURSRVDOLVWRVXEGLYLGHWKHVLWHLQWRLQGLYLGXDOSDUFHOVLQFOXGLQJ GHWDFKHGVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOORWVVL[DWWDFKHGVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOORWVDQGWKUHH KRPHRZQHUVDVVRFLDWLRQ
+2$
SDUFHOVWKDWLQFOXGHDQRSHQVSDFHEXIIHUDURXQGWKH
SHULPHWHURIWKHVLWHDVWRUPZDWHUGHWHQWLRQEDVLQWZRRSHQVSDFHNQROOVSXEOLFWUDLOV DQGDSULYDWHO\RZQHGVWUHHW
7KH&LW\&RXQFLOUHYLHZHGDQHDUOLHUYHUVLRQRIWKHSURSRVDORQ6HSWHPEHUDQG DGRSWHG5HVROXWLRQ
$WWDFKPHQW
UHFRPPHQGLQJWKHDSSOLFDQWUHWXUQWRWKH
3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQZLWKDUHYLVHGSURMHFWWKDWLVSK\VLFDOO\DQGDHVWKHWLFDOO\PRUH VXERUGLQDWHWRWKHQDWXUDOODQGIRUPVNQROOVDQGUHGXFHVRYHUDOOJUDGLQJDQGSURYLGHVD VHFRQGDU\HPHUJHQF\YHKLFOHDQGSHGHVWULDQDFFHVV
123
ATTACHMENT 5
418
3DJH
7KHWDEOHEHORZLQFOXGHVWKH&LW\&RXQFLO¶VVSHFLILFGLUHFWLRQDQGWKHDSSOLFDQW¶VUHVSRQVH City Council Directive Project Modification
Reduce the number of units Reduction in the number of units from 47 to 44 (including six affordable duet units) and overall structures from 47 to 41 Reduce the size of the units Reduction in size of units from 2,530 - 3,530 square feet to 2,390 - 3,150 square feet (Note: All figures exclude garage)
Reduce the heights of the units Building pad elevations have been lowered and roof forms have been altered to reduce the heights of the units
Narrow street widths Street widths have been narrowed throughout the project by making the project road private instead of public
Reduce wall heights
Retaining wall heights have been lowered throughout the project by reducing grading by 46,000 cubic yards (from 161,200 to 115,220 cubic yards of cut)
Provide high quality visual simulations/videos that
accurately represent the Project in context with
the natural environment and neighborhood
The Applicant has provided new or revised visual simulations, in either panoramic or 50 mm lens format that mimics human sight, that show the project in context from several vantage points 7KH)LQDO(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUWLQGLFDWHVWKDWWKHVLWHFDQEHGHYHORSHGZLWKRXW VLJQLILFDQWLPSDFWVWRWKHHQYLURQPHQWDQGVXSSRUWWKLVLQILOOGHYHORSPHQWDWDGHQVLW\ FRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHFXUUHQW*HQHUDO3ODQ8UEDQ/RZ5HVLGHQWLDOODQGXVH GHVLJQDWLRQDWWRGZHOOLQJXQLWVSHUDFUH7KHSURMHFWDVFRQGLWLRQHGDOVRFRQIRUPV WRDOODSSOLFDEOH]RQLQJDQGGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGV7KH3URMHFWLVFRPSDUDEOHLQ GHYHORSPHQWSDWWHUQWRWKH$OWDPRQW&UHHNDQG%OXII¶VGHYHORSPHQWVWRWKHHDVWDQG QRUWKHDVW
$WWDFKPHQW
DQGSURYLGHVSXEOLFDFFHVVWRWKHRQVLWHNQROOVDQGURFN RXWFURSWKDWFXUUHQWO\DUHSULYDWHO\RZQHG6LQFHWKHSURMHFWQRORQJHUUHTXLUHV PRGLILFDWLRQRIDQ\RIWKHDSSOLFDEOHGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVWKH&LW\&RXQFLOZLOOEH DFWLQJLQLWVDGMXGLFDWRU\UROHWRDSSO\WKH&LW\¶VH[LVWLQJGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVWRWKH SURMHFW,IWKHSURMHFWLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKRVHVWDQGDUGVWKH&RXQFLOLVUHTXLUHGWR DSSURYHWKHSURMHFW
',6&866,21
%DFNJURXQG
7KLVSURMHFWVLWHKDVDQH[WHQVLYHODQGXVHKLVWRU\DQGLVWKHODVWUHPDLQLQJGHYHORSDEOH SDUFHOXQGHUWKH0DUDOLVDGHYHORSPHQW2Q-XO\WKHDSSOLFDQWVXEPLWWHGD GHYHORSPHQWDSSOLFDWLRQIRUKRPHVRQWKHVLWH7KHDSSOLFDWLRQLQFOXGHGD*HQHUDO 3ODQ$PHQGPHQWWRFKDQJHWKHGHVLJQDWLRQWR8UEDQ/RZ0HGLXP5HVLGHQWLDO 
GZHOOLQJXQLWVSHUDFUH
LQRUGHUWRHQDEOHWKHFRQWLQXHGGHQVLW\WUDQVIHUHQYLVLRQHG XQGHUWKH0DUDOLVDGHYHORSPHQW7KHSURSRVDOLQFOXGHGDVHFRQGDFFHVVYLDDQ H[WHQVLRQRI+DZN6WUHHWDQGDQHZWZRZD\YHKLFXODUDQGSHGHVWULDQEULGJHDFURVV $OWDPRQW&UHHN
2Q'HFHPEHUWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQKHOGDSXEOLFKHDULQJWRUHFHLYH FRPPHQWVRQWKH'UDIW(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUW
'UDIW(,5
6HYHUDOSXEOLF
FRPPHQWVLQFOXGHGFRQFHUQZLWKLQFUHDVHGFXWWKURXJKWUDIILFRQ+DZN6WUHHWDQG 124
ATTACHMENT 5
419
3DJH
SRWHQWLDOFRQIOLFWVZLWKVWXGHQWVGXULQJGURSRIIDQGSLFNXSWLPHVDW$OWDPRQW&UHHN (OHPHQWDU\6FKRRO,QUHVSRQVHWRGLUHFWLRQIURP&LW\VWDIIDQGFRPPHQWVUHFHLYHGGXULQJ WKH'HFHPEHU3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQKHDULQJWKHDSSOLFDQWPDGHWKHFKDQJHV OLVWHGEHORZEHIRUHWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ¶VIRUPDOFRQVLGHUDWLRQRIWKH3URMHFW 
x 5HGXFWLRQLQWKHQXPEHURIXQLWVIURPWR
x (OLPLQDWLRQRIWKH+DZN6WUHHWH[WHQVLRQDQGEULGJHRYHU$OWDPRQW&UHHN x 3UHVHUYDWLRQRIWKHURFNRXWFURSLQWKHQRUWKZHVWFRUQHURIWKHVLWHDQG x 3URYLVLRQRIDQDGGLWLRQDOVWRU\IORRUSODQDQGDòVWRU\IORRUSODQ 2Q-XO\WKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQUHFRPPHQGHGWKH&LW\&RXQFLOGHQ\WKH 3URMHFW*HQHUDOO\WKH&RPPLVVLRQ¶VUHFRPPHQGDWLRQZDVGXHWRWKH3URMHFW¶VH[WHQVLYH JUDGLQJXQNQRZQDHVWKHWLFFRQWH[WDQGFRQFHUQIURPWKH/LYHUPRUH$UHD5HFUHDWLRQDQG 3DUN'LVWULFW
3DUN'LVWULFW
UHJDUGLQJFRPSDWLELOLW\ZLWKWKHDGMDFHQW*DUDYHQWD3UHVHUYH 7KHDSSOLFDQWFKRVHQRWWRSXUVXHDGHFLVLRQIURPWKH&LW\&RXQFLO,QVWHDGWKH\FKRVHWR PDNHPRUHFKDQJHVWRWKHSURMHFWDQGUHWXUQWRWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ 2Q$XJXVWWKHSURMHFWUHWXUQHGWRWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ7KH&RPPLVVLRQ YRWHGXQDQLPRXVO\WRUHFRPPHQGWKH&LW\&RXQFLODSSURYHWKHSURMHFWWKDWLQFOXGHGWKH IROORZLQJUHYLVLRQV

x 5HSODFLQJDSRUWLRQRIURDGZD\ZLWKDQ(PHUJHQF\9HKLFOH$FFHVVLQRUGHUWR UHGXFHJUDGLQJ
x (OLPLQDWLQJQHZODQGVFDSLQJEHWZHHQWKH3URMHFWVLWHDQGWKH*DUDYHQWD:HWODQGV 3UHVHUYHWRSUHVHUYHWKHQDWXUDOJUDVVODQGFRQGLWLRQ
x 3URYLGLQJDGUDLQV\VWHPWRFROOHFWDOOUXQRIIIURPWKHUHVLGHQWLDOORWVDQGFRQYH\LWWR WKHWUHDWPHQWEDVLQWRSURWHFWWKHVRLOFKHPLVWU\LQWKH*DUDYHQWD:HWODQGV 3UHVHUYH
x &RQVWUXFWLQJDSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHSDWKWKDWFRQQHFWVWRWKHH[LVWLQJWUDLOVRXWKRI %HDU&UHHN'ULYHWROLQNWKH3URMHFWWR$OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNDQG x 3URYLGLQJYLVXDOVLPXODWLRQVRIWKH3URMHFWLQFRQWH[WZLWKWKHVXUURXQGLQJGHYHORSHG DQGQDWXUDOHQYLURQPHQWV
7KHSURMHFWFRQWLQXHGWRH[FOXGHH[WHQGLQJ+DZN6WUHHWDQGGLGQRWLQFOXGHDQHZEULGJH RYHU$OWDPRQW&UHHN7KH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQFRPPHQGHGWKHDSSOLFDQWIRUUHYLVLQJ WKHGHYHORSPHQWSODQVWRDGGUHVVFRQFHUQVIURPWKH&RPPLVVLRQFRPPXQLW\DQG3DUN 'LVWULFW7KH\DOVRFRPPHQGHGWKH6DYH2XU+LOO*URXSIRUWKHLUHIIRUWVWKDWOHGWR SUHVHUYLQJWKHRQVLWHNQROOVDQGURFNRXWFURSDQGRSHQHGWKHVHIHDWXUHVIRUPDOO\IRUXVH E\WKHSXEOLF
2Q6HSWHPEHUWKH&LW\&RXQFLOFRQVLGHUHGWKH3URMHFWDQGDGRSWHG5HVROXWLRQ UHFRPPHQGLQJWKHDSSOLFDQWUHWXUQWRWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQZLWKDSURMHFW WKDWLVSK\VLFDOO\DQGDHVWKHWLFDOO\PRUHVXERUGLQDWHWRWKHQDWXUDOODQGIRUPVNQROOVDQG UHGXFHVRYHUDOOJUDGLQJDQGSURYLGHVDVHFRQGDU\HPHUJHQF\YHKLFOHDQGSHGHVWULDQ DFFHVV
125
ATTACHMENT 5
420
3DJH
2Q$XJXVWWKH&LW\KHOGDQHLJKERUKRRGPHHWLQJWRSUHVHQWWKHODWHVWFKDQJHVWR WKH3URMHFWDQGDQVZHUTXHVWLRQV
2Q'HFHPEHUWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQFRQVLGHUHGWKHFXUUHQWSURSRVDODQG YRWHGXQDQLPRXVO\WRUHFRPPHQGWKH&LW\&RXQFLODSSURYHWKHSURMHFW6HHWKH3ODQQLQJ &RPPLVVLRQVHFWLRQRIWKLVUHSRUWIRUDGGLWLRQDOGHWDLOV7KH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQVWDII UHSRUWLQFOXGHVDQH[WHQVLYHGLVFXVVLRQRIWKHVLWH¶VKLVWRU\DQGDGHWDLOHGDQDO\VLVRIWKH 3URMHFW
$WWDFKPHQW

7KHFXUUHQWSURSRVDOUHVSRQGVWRDOORIWKHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIURP WKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQDQGVWDII
&XUUHQW3URSRVDO
7KHDSSOLFDQWKDVPDGHWKHIROORZLQJVLJQLILFDQWFKDQJHVWRUHGXFHRYHUDOOJUDGLQJDQG SUHSDUHDSURMHFWWKDWLVSK\VLFDOO\DQGDHVWKHWLFDOO\PRUHVXERUGLQDWHWRWKHQDWXUDO ODQGIRUPVDQGSURYLGHVDVHFRQGDU\HPHUJHQF\YHKLFOHDQGSHGHVWULDQDFFHVV 
x 5HGXFHGWKHQXPEHURIXQLWVIURPWR
LQFOXGLQJVL[DIIRUGDEOHGXHWXQLWV

x 5HGXFHGWKHDYHUDJHVL]HRIWKHXQLWV
x /RZHUHGWKHEXLOGLQJSDGHOHYDWLRQV
x $OWHUHGWKHURRIIRUPVWRSURYLGHYLHZFRUULGRUV
x &RPSOLHGZLWKWKHVWDQGDUGVRIWKHXQGHUO\LQJ]RQLQJGLVWULFW 3ODQQHG8QLW
'HYHORSPHQW

x 1DUURZHGWKHURDGZLGWKV
x 5HGXFHGWKHKHLJKWRIUHWDLQLQJZDOOV
x 3URYLGHGDQHPHUJHQF\YHKLFOHDFFHVV
(9$
SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHEULGJHIURP
+DZN6WUHHW
x 3URYLGHGDGGLWLRQDOGLYHUVLW\LQWKHSURSRVHGKRXVLQJVWRFNLQWHUPVRIDUFKLWHFWXUH FRORUVDQGPDWHULDOVDQG
x 3URYLGHGQHZDQGXSGDWHGYLVXDOVLPXODWLRQVRIWKH3URMHFWLQFRQWH[WZLWKWKH VXUURXQGLQJGHYHORSHGDQGQDWXUDOHQYLURQPHQWV
7KH3URMHFWLVDXQLWVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOVXEGLYLVLRQRQDYDFDQWDSSUR[LPDWHO\ DFUHVLWH$ZHVWHUO\H[WHQVLRQRI%HDU&UHHN'ULYHSURYLGHVDFFHVVWRWKHLQWHUQDO UHVLGHQWLDOVWUHHWFLUFXPVFULELQJWKHVLWH¶VWZRSURPLQHQWNQROOV6LQJOHIDPLO\GHWDFKHG ORWVL]HVUDQJHIURPWRVTXDUHIHHWZLWKKRPHVEHWZHHQ  WR
VTXDUHIHHWLQVL]HH[FOXGLQJJDUDJH7KHGXHWORWVUDQJHLQVL]HIURPWR VTXDUHIHHWZLWKKRPHVRIHLWKHURU
VTXDUHIHHWLQVL]HH[FOXGLQJJDUDJH
7KHGXHWXQLWVDUHDWWDFKHGDORQJRQHZDOOEXWHDFKXQLWLVRQDQLQGLYLGXDOORWZLWKD SURSHUW\OLQHORFDWHGLQWKHFHQWHURIWKHVKDUHGZDOO/RWVDQGURDGZD\VZLOOFRPSULVH DSSUR[LPDWHO\SHUFHQWRIWKHVLWHZLWKWKHUHPDLQLQJODQGUHVHUYHGIRURSHQVSDFH EXIIHUVRQWKHVLWH¶VHGJHVXQGHYHORSHGNQROOVZLWKSHGHVWULDQWUDLOVDQGDVWRUPZDWHU GHWHQWLRQEDVLQZLWKRXWIDOOSLSHWR$OWDPRQW&UHHN
$KRPHRZQHU¶VDVVRFLDWLRQZLOOEHUHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKHSULYDWHVWUHHW GHWHQWLRQEDVLQSURMHFWODQGVFDSLQJDQGDOORSHQVSDFHDUHDV LQFOXGLQJWUDLOV
7KH
LQIRUPDOWUDLOVFXUUHQWO\IRXQGRQWKHSULYDWHO\RZQHGNQROOVZLOOEHIRUPDOO\GHVLJQDWHGIRU 126
ATTACHMENT 5
421
3DJH
SXEOLFDFFHVV$FRPPXQLW\IDFLOLWLHVGLVWULFWZLOOIXQGPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKHHPHUJHQF\ YHKLFOHDFFHVV
(9$
SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHEULGJH
&LW\&RXQFLO5ROHDQG5HVSRQVLELOLW\
7KHLQLWLDOSURSRVDOIRUXQLWVDQGWKHYHKLFXODUEULGJHRYHU$OWDPRQW&UHHNUHTXLUHGD *HQHUDO3ODQ$PHQGPHQWDQG5H]RQLQJWRFKDQJHWKHVLWH¶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
*HQHUDO3ODQDQG=RQLQJ

7KHUHIRUHWKH&LW\&RXQFLOZLOOQRORQJHUEHDFWLQJLQDOHJLVODWLYHUROHEXWLQDTXDVL MXGLFLDOUROH,QWKLVDGMXGLFDWRU\UROHWKH&LW\&RXQFLO¶VGLVFUHWLRQLVOLPLWHGWRMXGJLQJLID SURMHFWLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKH[LVWLQJODZV,IWKH&LW\&RXQFLOILQGVWKHSURMHFWFRPSOLHVZLWK H[LVWLQJODZVWKHQ&RXQFLOLVUHTXLUHGWRDSSURYHWKHSURMHFW *HQHUDO3ODQ
7KHVLWH¶V*HQHUDO3ODQODQGXVHGHVLJQDWLRQLV8UEDQ/RZ5HVLGHQWLDO 8/
DWWR
GZHOOLQJXQLWVSHUDFUH&RQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH8/ODQGXVHGHVLJQDWLRQWKHSURSRVDO¶V DYHUDJHGHQVLW\LVDSSUR[LPDWHO\XQLWVSHUDFUH
'HYHORSPHQWRIWKHVLWHGLGQRWRFFXUZLWKWKHUHVWRIWKH0DUDOLVDSURMHFWGXHWRSRWHQWLDO HQYLURQPHQWDOFRQVWUDLQWVEXWWKH0DUDOLVDSURMHFWPRYHGIRUZDUGDQGKDVDGHQVLW\RI XQLWVSHUDFUH'XULQJWKH&LW\¶V*HQHUDO3ODQ8SGDWHLQWKH*HQHUDO3ODQODQG XVHGHVLJQDWLRQIRUWKHVLWHFKDQJHGIURP8UEDQ/RZ0HGLXP5HVLGHQWLDO 8/0
DWWR
XQLWVSHUDFUHWRLWVFXUUHQW8/GHVLJQDWLRQ7KHFKDQJHWRDORZHUGHQVLW\ZDVLQSDUW GXHWRWKHVLWH¶VSRWHQWLDOHQYLURQPHQWDOFRQVWUDLQWV 7KH3URMHFWVLWHLVZLWKLQWKH1RUWK/LYHUPRUH8UEDQ*URZWK%RXQGDU\DQG&LW\ ERXQGDU\DGMDFHQWWRHVWDEOLVKHGUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWVHUYHGE\&LW\XWLOLWLHVDQG KDVDUHVLGHQWLDO*HQHUDO3ODQODQGXVHGHVLJQDWLRQ7KHGHVLJQDWLRQRIWKHVLWHLQWKH *HQHUDO3ODQDVDORFDWLRQIRUUHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQWLQGLFDWHVLWLVSDUWRIWKH&LW\¶V SODQQHGJURZWKDQGQRWLQWHQGHGDVRSHQVSDFH7KH3URMHFWLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH *HQHUDO3ODQ
=RQLQJ
7KH3URMHFWVLWH¶VFXUUHQW=RQLQJ&ODVVLILFDWLRQLV3ODQQHG8QLW'HYHORSPHQW 38'

7KH3URMHFWFRQIRUPVWRDOODSSOLFDEOH]RQLQJDQGGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGV VHHWKH
127
ATTACHMENT 5
422
3DJH
DWWDFKHG3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQVWDIIUHSRUWIRUPRUHGHWDLOHGDQDO\VLVRI]RQLQJ

FRQIRUPDQFH

+RXVLQJ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3URJUDP
7KHDSSOLFDQWLVUHTXHVWLQJKRXVLQJDOORFDWLRQVWKDWDUHQHFHVVDU\WRGHYHORSWKH SURSHUW\XQGHUWKH&LW\¶V
+RXVLQJ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3URJUDP
+,3
ZKLFKLVWKH
&RXQFLODGRSWHGSROLF\WRPDQDJHUHVLGHQWLDOJURZWK7KHDOORFDWLRQVZRXOGRFFXUXSRQ WKH&LW\&RXQFLO¶VDSSURYDORIWKH6XEGLYLVLRQ0DS7KHDOORFDWLRQVZRXOGFRPHIURPWKH SRRORIXQLWVDYDLODEOHSHU\HDULQWKH*HQHUDO3ODQDUHDZKLFKDUHDOORFDWHGRQD ILUVWFRPHILUVWVHUYHEDVLV7KHUHKDYHQRWEHHQDQ\XQLWVDOORFDWHGLQWKH*HQHUDO3ODQ DUHDWKLV\HDU
+DZN6WUHHW%ULGJH
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
(9$
SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHEULGJHRYHU$OWDPRQW&UHHNFRQQHFWLQJWR +DZN6WUHHW$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHEULGJHVSDQV$OWDPRQW&UHHNDYRLGLQJWKHUHTXLUHPHQWWR UHDOLJQWKHFUHHNZKLFKZDVDVLJQLILFDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFW 6XEGLYLVLRQ
7KHGHYHORSPHQWSODQUHVSRQGVWRWKHQDWXUDOIRUPVDQGWRSRJUDSK\RIWKHVLWH)RU H[DPSOHWKH3URMHFW¶VVLQJOHSXEOLFURDGDQGPDLQWHQDQFHYHKLFOHDFFHVVURDGORRSV DURXQGWKHZHVWHUQNQROODQGIROORZVWKHVLWH¶VFRQWRXUVDORQJWKHVDGGOHEHWZHHQERWK NQROOVHQDEOLQJFRQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHURDGDQGKRPHVDWHOHYDWLRQVVLPLODUWRWKHH[LVWLQJ $OWDPRQW&UHHNGHYHORSPHQWWRWKHHDVW&OXVWHULQJKRPHVDORQJWKHURDGZD\PLQLPL]HV WKHGHYHORSPHQWIRRWSULQWDQGHQDEOHVWKHSUHVHUYDWLRQRIWKHURFNRXWFURSLQWKH QRUWKZHVWFRUQHUERWKNQROOVDQGWKHSURYLVLRQRIWKHQDWXUDOEXIIHUVIURPIHHWZLGHWR RYHUIHHWZLGHDURXQGWKHVLWH¶VSHULPHWHU
7KH3URMHFWIROORZVDGHYHORSPHQWSDWWHUQFRPPRQWRQHDUE\UHVLGHQWLDOGHYHORSPHQW WKDWFOXVWHUVGHYHORSPHQWLQRUGHUWRDYRLGQDWXUDOUHVRXUFHVDQGVLWHFRQVWUDLQWV7KH GHYHORSPHQWSDWWHUQIRUWKH$OWDPRQW&UHHNVXEGLYLVLRQWRWKHVRXWKHDVWWKDWLQFOXGHV %HDU&UHHN'ULYH.QROO:D\DQG&RXUW(GJHZDWHU/DQHDQG%ULGOH3DWK&RXUW 
7KH
+RXVLQJ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ3URJUDPHVWDEOLVKHVDQDQQXDODOORFDWLRQRIUHVLGHQWLDO XQLWVRIZKLFKXQLWVSHU\HDUDUHUHVHUYHGIRUSURMHFWVSDUWLFLSDWLQJLQWKH7UDQVIHUDEOH'HYHORSPHQW &UHGLWV
7'&
SURJUDPXQLWVSHU\HDUDUHUHVHUYHGIRU+,33URMHFWVVXFKDVWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQW 128
ATTACHMENT 5
423
3DJH
SUHVHUYHVWKHRQVLWHNQROORQWKHQRUWKZHVWHGJHRIWKHSURMHFWVLWHDYRLGVVHDVRQDO ZHWODQGVDQGLQFOXGHVVWUXFWXUHH[FOXVLRQ]RQHVGXHWRVHLVPLFFRQVWUDLQWV6LPLODUO\ GHYHORSPHQWDORQJ0HDGRZ*OHQ'ULYHGLUHFWO\HDVWRIWKH3URMHFWDOVRDYRLGVVHDVRQDO ZHWODQGVDQGLQFOXGHVVWUXFWXUHH[FOXVLRQ]RQHVLQUHVSRQVHWRVHLVPLFFRQVWUDLQWV7KH 6DGGOHEDFNGHYHORSPHQWDSSUR[LPDWHO\RQHKDOIPLOHWRWKHQRUWKZHVWRIWKH3URMHFWDW WKHQRUWKHDVWFRUQHURI$PHV6WUHHWDQG'DOWRQ$YHQXHDYRLGVVHDVRQDOZHWODQGVDQG SUHVHUYHVRQVLWHNQROOV
$WWDFKPHQW

7KH9HVWLQJ7HQWDWLYH7UDFW0DSZLOOVXEGLYLGHWKHVLWHLQWRLQGLYLGXDOSDUFHOVLQFOXGLQJ GHWDFKHGVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOORWVVL[DWWDFKHGVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDOORWVDQG WKUHHKRPHRZQHUVDVVRFLDWLRQ
+2$
SDUFHOVWKDWLQFOXGHDQRSHQVSDFHEXIIHUDURXQGWKH
SHULPHWHURIWKHVLWHDVWRUPZDWHUGHWHQWLRQEDVLQWKHWZRNQROOVSXEOLFWUDLOVDQGD SULYDWHO\RZQHGVWUHHW
3URMHFWJUDGLQJEDODQFHVFXWDQGILOORQVLWHDQGDYRLGVWKHRQVLWHNQROOVLQIRUPDOSDWKV DQGURFNRXWFURSLQWKHQRUWKZHVWFRUQHURIWKHVLWH$OORIWKHVHRQVLWHIHDWXUHVFXUUHQWO\ H[LVWRQWKHSULYDWHSURSHUW\EXWZLOOEHFRPHIRUPDOO\DFFHVVLEOHWRWKHSXEOLFZLWKWKH GHYHORSPHQWRIWKH3URMHFW
7KHDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJREOLJDWLRQIRUWKHSURMHFWLVXQLWV SHUFHQWRISURSRVHG
XQLWV
8QGHUWKH&LW\¶VRUGLQDQFHDIIRUGDEOHXQLWVDUHUHTXLUHGWREHFRPSDUDEOHWRWKH SURSRVHGPDUNHWUDWHXQLWV7KHRUGLQDQFHDOVRSHUPLWVWKHDSSOLFDQWWRSURSRVH DOWHUQDWLYHPHWKRGVRIPHHWLQJWKHDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJREOLJDWLRQIRUWKHSURMHFW &RQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHVHSURYLVLRQVDQGZLWKWKHVXSSRUWRIVWDIIWKHDSSOLFDQWSURSRVHVWR VDWLVI\LWVDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJREOLJDWLRQE\


VDWLVI\LQJWKUHHRIWKHUHTXLUHGDIIRUGDEOH
XQLWVLQWKH3URMHFWE\FRQVWUXFWLQJVL[VPDOOHUDIIRUGDEOHDWWDFKHGXQLWVIRUVDOHWRORZ DQGPRGHUDWHLQFRPHEX\HUVDQG

SD\LQJLQFDVKWKHHTXLYDOHQWYDOXHRIZKDWWKH
&LW\ZRXOGRWKHUZLVHUHFHLYHIRUWKHUHPDLQLQJDIIRUGDEOHXQLWVLQWKHGHYHORSPHQW WRVDWLVI\WKHUHPDLQGHURIWKHUHTXLUHPHQW7KHYDOXHRIWKHLQFOXVLRQDU\SURPLVVRU\ QRWHVDQGUHVXOWLQJFDVKSD\PHQWLVWREHFDOFXODWHGDQGSDLGQRODWHUWKDQWKHWLPHRI WKHWKEXLOGLQJSHUPLWDSSOLFDWLRQ7KLVPHWKRGRIVDWLVI\LQJWKHDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJ UHTXLUHPHQWLHSURYLGLQJDIIRUGDEOHGXHWXQLWVLQDVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDO GHYHORSPHQWZDVDSSURYHGIRUWKH3RQGHURVD9LQVDQWR,,VXEGLYLVLRQ DWWKH2UFKLG
5DQFKVLWHHDVWRI,VDEHO$YHQXH
DQGWKH*URYHVXEGLYLVLRQRII0LQHV5RDG7KHGHWDLOV RIWKHDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJSURYLVLRQZLOOEHVXEMHFWWR&LW\&RXQFLODSSURYDORID+RXVLQJ $JUHHPHQWEHIRUHDGRSWLRQRIWKHILQDOPDS
7KH/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\-RLQW8QLILHG6FKRRO'LVWULFWKDVSURYLGHGOHWWHUVLQFOXGLQJDUHFHQW OHWWHUGDWHG'HFHPEHU
$WWDFKPHQW
LQGLFDWLQJWKH'LVWULFWZLOOEHDEOHWR
DFFRPPRGDWHWKHSURMHFWHGVWXGHQWHQUROOPHQWLQFUHDVHVUHVXOWLQJIURPWKHSURSRVHG XQLWSURMHFW$GGLWLRQDOO\WKH'LVWULFWSURYLGHGDVXSSOHPHQWDU\PHPR $WWDFKPHQW

LQGLFDWLQJWKH'LVWULFW¶VSDVWVHYHUDO\HDUV¶HQUROOPHQWSURMHFWLRQVKDYHDVVXPHGDXQLW SURMHFWIRUWKHVLWHZLWKQRDQWLFLSDWHGFRQFHUQV
7KHSURMHFWUHVXOWVLQWKHSHUPDQHQWORVVRIXSWRDFUHVRIQRQQDWLYHDQQXDO JUDVVODQGWKDWKDVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRVXSSRUWVHYHUDOVSHFLDOVWDWXVDQLPDOVSHFLHV 129
ATTACHMENT 5
424
3DJH
3URSRVHGHQYLURQPHQWDOPLWLJDWLRQIRUWKH3URMHFWLQFOXGHVWKHDSSOLFDQWSODFLQJDQ DFUHSURSHUW\LQWKH6SULQJWRZQ$ONDOL6LQNDOVRRZQHGE\WKH*DUDYHQWDIDPLO\XQGHUD SHUPDQHQWFRQVHUYDWLRQHDVHPHQWZLWKDQHQGRZPHQWIRUUHVWRUDWLRQDQGPDQDJHPHQW LQSHUSHWXLW\7KHPLWLJDWLRQSDUFHOLVORFDWHGQRUWKRI6FHQLF$YHQXHEHWZHHQ%OXHEHOO $YHQXHDQG%URDGPRRU$YHQXH
$WWDFKPHQW

6LWH3ODQ'HVLJQ5HYLHZ
7KHDSSOLFDQW¶VGHVLJQWHDPZRUNHGFORVHO\ZLWK&LW\VWDIIWRGHYHORSDVLWHGHVLJQWKDWLV FRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKH&LW\¶V'HVLJQ6WDQGDUGDQG*XLGHOLQHVWKH/LYHUPRUH'HYHORSPHQW &RGHDQGSXEOLFVDIHW\HQJLQHHULQJDQGWUDQVSRUWDWLRQVWDQGDUGV7KHGHYHORSPHQW SODQVDQGDUFKLWHFWXUHLQFOXGHDOORIWKHUHFRPPHQGDWLRQVIURPWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ DQGVWDII7KH3URMHFWUHIOHFWVDSSURSULDWHVLWHSODQQLQJKLJKTXDOLW\DUFKLWHFWXUHDQG ODQGVFDSHGHVLJQWKDWFRQWULEXWHVSRVLWLYHO\WRWKHQHLJKERUKRRG¶VUHVLGHQWLDOFKDUDFWHU 3ODQVWKURXJKKDYHWKUHHYDULDWLRQVLQDUFKLWHFWXUDOVW\OH 6SDQLVK9LOODDQG
)DUPKRXVH
ZKLOH3ODQKDVWZR
6SDQLVKDQG)DUPKRXVH
$GGLWLRQDOO\HDFK
DUFKLWHFWXUDOVW\OHLVVXSSRUWHGE\WKUHHRSWLRQDOFRORUPDWHULDOVFKHPHV7KHYDULHW\RI IORRUSODQVDUFKLWHFWXUDOVW\OHYDULDWLRQVDQGFRORUVFKHPHVFRQWULEXWHVYLVXDOLQWHUHVWWR WKHVWUHHWVFDSHDQGIDFLOLWDWHVWKHSODFHPHQWRIGLIIHUHQWIORRUSODQVDFURVVWKHVWUHHW IURPHDFKRWKHU
6HHWKHDWWDFKHG3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQVWDIIUHSRUWIRUDPRUHGHWDLOHG GLVFXVVLRQRIWKHSURMHFWGHVLJQ

3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ
2Q'HFHPEHUWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQIRUPDOO\FRQVLGHUHGWKHSURMHFWKHOGD SXEOLFKHDULQJDQGUHFRPPHQGHGXQDQLPRXVO\WRDSSURYHWKHSURMHFW 7KHUHZHUHPHPEHUVRIWKHSXEOLFZKRFRPPHQWHGGXULQJWKHSXEOLFKHDULQJDQG RIWKHFRPPHQWHUVUDLVHGFRQFHUQVDERXWWKHSURMHFW7KHOLVWEHORZVXPPDUL]HVWKH PRVWIUHTXHQWO\UDLVHGFRQFHUQVH[SUHVVHGDWWKHPHHWLQJDQGVWDII¶VUHVSRQVHVWRWKH

FRPPHQWV

 %LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV
&RPPHQWV
&RQFHUQVLQFOXGHGWKHHOLPLQDWLRQRIKDELWDWIRUVHQVLWLYHDQLPDODQGSODQW VSHFLHV
5HVSRQVH
7KH'UDIW(,5DFNQRZOHGJHVWKHSHUPDQHQWORVVRIXSWRDFUHVRIQRQ QDWLYHDQQXDOJUDVVODQGWKDWKDVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRVXSSRUWVHYHUDOVSHFLDOVWDWXVDQLPDO VSHFLHVLQFOXGLQJ
&DOLIRUQLDWLJHUVDODPDQGHU&DOLIRUQLDUHGOHJJHGIURJYHUQDOSRROIDLU\ VKULPS6DQ-RDTXLQNLWIR[ZHVWHUQVSDGHIRRWWRDG&DOLIRUQLDEXUURZLQJRZODQG $PHULFDQEDGJHU$Q\GLVWXUEDQFHRIIHGHUDODQG6WDWHSURWHFWHGDQLPDODQGSODQW VSHFLHVUHTXLUHVHQYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLWVIURPIHGHUDODQG6WDWHUHVRXUFHDJHQFLHV LQFOXGLQJWKH86)LVK :LOGOLIH6HUYLFHDQG&DOLIRUQLD'HSDUWPHQWRI)LVK :LOGOLIH 7\SLFDOO\HQYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLWVIURPWKHVH5HVRXUFH$JHQFLHVUHTXLUHKDELWDWORVV 130
ATTACHMENT 5
425
3DJH

FRPSHQVDWLRQLQWKHIRUPRIKDELWDWDFTXLVLWLRQDWDSSUR[LPDWHO\ UDWLRV
DFUHV

SUHVHUYHG
DFUHVGLVWXUEHG

3URSRVHGHQYLURQPHQWDOPLWLJDWLRQIRUWKH3URMHFWLVWRSODFHDQDFUHSURSHUW\LQWKH 6SULQJWRZQ$ONDOL6LQNDOVRRZQHGE\WKH*DUDYHQWDIDPLO\XQGHUDSHUPDQHQW FRQVHUYDWLRQHDVHPHQWZLWKDQHQGRZPHQWIRUUHVWRUDWLRQDQGPDQDJHPHQWLQ SHUSHWXLW\7KHDFUHSURSHUW\KDVVHQVLWLYHVRLOVVSHFLDOVWDWXVDQLPDODQGSODQW VSHFLHVYHUQDOSRROVDQGDVHJPHQWRI$OWDPRQW&UHHN7KHHQYLURQPHQWDOPLWLJDWLRQ ZLOOEHFRRUGLQDWHGZLWKWKH5HVRXUFH$JHQFLHVGXULQJVXEVHTXHQWHQYLURQPHQWDO SHUPLWWLQJ
7KHVLWHLVZLWKLQWKHDUHDFRYHUHGE\WKH(DVW$ODPHGD&RXQW\&RQVHUYDWLRQ6WUDWHJ\

&RQVHUYDWLRQ6WUDWHJ\
DJXLGDQFHGRFXPHQWIRUUHJLRQDOFRQVHUYDWLRQDQG
HQYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLWWLQJIRUSULYDWHDQGSXEOLFGHYHORSPHQWSURMHFWV7KH5H,VVXHG )LQDO(,5LQFOXGHVPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVWKDWUHTXLUHWKHDSSOLFDQWWRDFTXLUHRIIVLWH FRPSHQVDWRU\KDELWDWFRQVLVWHQWZLWKFRPSHQVDWLRQUDWLRVXQGHUWKH&RQVHUYDWLRQ 6WUDWHJ\$GGLWLRQDOPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVLQFOXGHSUHFRQVWUXFWLRQVXUYH\VWRHQVXUH VSHFLHVDUHDEVHQWIURPWKHVLWHEHIRUHFRQVWUXFWLRQEHJLQVDQGSURWHFWLRQPHDVXUHVWR EHWDNHQGXULQJFRQVWUXFWLRQWRHQVXUHVSHFLHVGRQRWPLJUDWHRQWRWKHVLWH  9LVXDO3URPLQHQFHDQG9LHZV
&RPPHQWV
&RQFHUQVZHUHSULPDULO\ZLWKWKH3URMHFW¶VYLVXDOSURPLQHQFHIURPH[LVWLQJ UHVLGHQFHVLQWKHQHLJKERUKRRGVWRWKHVRXWKHDVWDQGQRUWKHDVW 5HVSRQVH
2QHRI/LYHUPRUH¶VPRVWGLVWLQFWLYHIHDWXUHVDUHWKHKLOOVDQGULGJHOLQHVWKDW VXUURXQGWKH&LW\PRVWRIZKLFKOLHRXWVLGHWKH&LW\OLPLWV6LJQLILFDQWULGJHOLQHVORFDWHG QRUWKRIWKH,FRUULGRULQFOXGH%UXVK\3HDNWRWKHQRUWKHDVWDVZHOODVWKH$OWDPRQW +LOOVHDVWRI9DVFRDQG*UHHQYLOOH5RDGV2WKHURSHQVSDFHWRWKHQRUWKFRQVLVWVRIPRUH PRGHUDWHWRSRJUDSK\ZLWKUROOLQJKLOOVDQGUDQJHODQGV/LYHUPRUH¶VEXLOWHQYLURQPHQW DQGLWVSODQQLQJSROLFLHVDUHGHVLJQHGWRSUHVHUYHYLHZVWRWKHVHKLOOVIURPSXEOLF YDQWDJHSRLQWV
7KH*HQHUDO3ODQ&RPPXQLW\&KDUDFWHU(OHPHQWLQFOXGHV*RDOV2EMHFWLYHVDQG3ROLFLHV WRSUHVHUYHYLHZVRI/LYHUPRUH¶VVXUURXQGLQJKLOOVLGHVDQGULGJHOLQHVSDUWLFXODUO\IURP ,7KH3URMHFWGRHVQRWVXEVWDQWLDOO\DOWHUYLHZVRILGHQWLILHGVFHQLFUHVRXUFHVIURP LGHQWLILHGYLVWDVDQGZRXOGQRWVXEVWDQWLDOO\FKDQJHYLHZVWRZDUGWKHVHVFHQLFUHVRXUFHV IURPQHDUE\SXEOLFDUHDV
3DUNVDUHFRQVLGHUHGSXEOLFORFDWLRQVIURPZKLFKYLHZVDUHLPSRUWDQW7KHH[LVWLQJYLHZV IURP$OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNDUHFXUUHQWO\REVWUXFWHGE\WKH3URMHFWVLWHDQGGRQRWLQFOXGH YLHZVWRZDUG%UXVK\3HDNDQGWKHULGJHOLQHVEH\RQG7KH3URMHFWPDLQWDLQVSRUWLRQVRI WKHYLHZVRIWKHRQVLWHNQROOVIURP$OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNE\SODFLQJKRPHVRYHUIHHW ZHVWRIWKH3URMHFWHQWU\DQGDYRLGLQJWKHVRXWKHDVWHUQNQROO 131
ATTACHMENT 5
426
3DJH
7KH$SSOLFDQWKDVSURYLGHGYLVXDOVLPXODWLRQVLQHLWKHUSDQRUDPLFRUPPOHQVIRUPDW WKDWPLPLFVKXPDQVLJKWWKDWVKRZWKHSURMHFWLQFRQWH[WIURPVHYHUDOYDQWDJHSRLQWV 
x $OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNORRNLQJQRUWK

SDQRUDPLF


x ([LVWLQJWHUPLQXVRI%HDU&UHHN'ULYHORRNLQJQRUWKZHVW

SDQRUDPLF


x 1RUWKRI.QROO&RXUWORRNLQJZHVW

SDQRUDPLF


x 1RUWKRI%ULGOH3DWK&RXUWORRNLQJQRUWKZHVW
PP


x 9DVFR5RDGORRNLQJHDVW

SDQRUDPLF


x ([LVWLQJWHUPLQXVRI+DZN6WUHHWORRNLQJQRUWKHDVW

SDQRUDPLF


x 7LIIDQ\&RPPRQORRNLQJQRUWKHDVW
PP
DQGHDVW
PP

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

SURYLGHG

x 3URYLGHDGGLWLRQDOSKRWRVLPXODWLRQ
V
GHSLFWLQJWKHSURMHFWDVYLHZHGIURPWKH
VXUURXQGLQJDUHD
7KHDSSOLFDQWKDVSURYLGHGQHZSKRWRVLPXODWLRQVWDNHQIURP7LIIDQ\&RPPRQORRNLQJ QRUWKHDVWDQGHDVW
SDJHV3'DQG3'$RISODQV
DQGIURP%ULGOH3DWK&RXUW
ORRNLQJQRUWKZHVW
SDJH3'$RISODQV
$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHDSSOLFDQWKDVSURYLGHG
UHYLVHGSKRWRVLPXODWLRQVIURP$OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNORRNLQJQRUWK SDJHV3'DQG3'
$RISODQV
IURPH[LVWLQJWHUPLQXVRI%HDU&UHHN'ULYHORRNLQJQRUWKZHVW SDJH3'
RISODQV
IURP9DVFR5RDGORRNLQJHDVW
SDJHV3'DQG3'$RISODQV
DQGIURP
WKHH[LVWLQJWHUPLQXVRI+DZN6WUHHWORRNLQJQRUWKHDVW SDJH3'RISODQV
7KH
UHYLVLRQVDUHDVIROORZV

x 7KHSKRWRVLPXODWLRQVIURP$OWDPRQW&UHHN3DUNORRNLQJQRUWKDQGIURPWKH H[LVWLQJWHUPLQXVRI%HDU&UHHN'ULYHORRNLQJQRUWKZHVWKDYHEHHQUHYLVHGWR VKRZWKHWLHUHGUHWDLQLQJZDOOVKRZQLQWKHFLYLOGUDZLQJVDORQJWKHQRUWKVLGHRI WKHHQWU\GULYHZD\ZLWKDVVRFLDWHGIHQFLQJDQGODQGVFDSLQJDQGWRVKRZ ODQGVFDSLQJERWKDWLQVWDOODWLRQDQGVHYHQ\HDUVDIWHULQVWDOODWLRQ 
x 7KHSKRWRVLPXODWLRQVIURP9DVFR5RDGORRNLQJHDVWDQGIURPWKHH[LVWLQJ WHUPLQXVRI+DZN6WUHHWORRNLQJQRUWKHDVWKDYHEHHQUHYLVHGWRVKRZODQGVFDSLQJ ERWKDWLQVWDOODWLRQDQGVHYHQ\HDUVDIWHULQVWDOODWLRQ 
$OVRWKHDSSOLFDQWKDVUHYLVHGWKUHHODQGVFDSHSODQSDJHV SDJHV3'3'DQG3'
RISODQV
DQGDGGHGRQHSODQSDJH
SDJH3'RISODQV
WRWKHODQGVFDSHSODQVWR
132
ATTACHMENT 5
427
3DJH
IXUWKHULOOXVWUDWHWKHWLHUHGUHWDLQLQJZDOOZLWKDVVRFLDWHGIHQFLQJDQGODQGVFDSLQJDORQJ WKHQRUWKVLGHRIWKHHQWU\GULYHZD\
 6FKRRO,PSDFWV
&RPPHQWV
&RQFHUQVLQFOXGHGSURMHFWHGVWXGHQWHQUROOPHQWLQFUHDVHVDQGFRQIOLFWVZLWK VWXGHQWGURSRIIRSHUDWLRQVDQGFRQGLWLRQVDW$OWDPRQW&UHHN(OHPHQWDU\6FKRRO7KH 3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQDGGHGDUHFRPPHQGDWLRQWRSURYLGHLQIRUPDWLRQIURPWKH6FKRRO 'LVWULFWUHJDUGLQJGURSRIIDQGSLFNXSRSHUDWLRQV
5HVSRQVH
7KH/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\-RLQW8QLILHG6FKRRO'LVWULFWKDVSURYLGHGOHWWHUV LQFOXGLQJDUHFHQWOHWWHUGDWHG'HFHPEHU
$WWDFKPHQW
LQGLFDWLQJWKH'LVWULFW
ZLOOEHDEOHWRDFFRPPRGDWHWKHSURMHFWHGVWXGHQWHQUROOPHQWLQFUHDVHVUHVXOWLQJIURP WKHSURSRVHGXQLWSURMHFW$GGLWLRQDOO\WKH'LVWULFWSURYLGHGDVXSSOHPHQWDU\PHPR

$WWDFKPHQW
LQGLFDWLQJWKH'LVWULFW¶VSDVWVHYHUDO\HDUV¶HQUROOPHQWSURMHFWLRQVKDYH DVVXPHGDXQLWSURMHFWIRUWKHVLWHZLWKQRDQWLFLSDWHGFRQFHUQV7KHPHPRDOVR GLVFXVVHVVWXGHQWGURSRIIRSHUDWLRQVDQGFRQGLWLRQVDW$OWDPRQW&UHHN(OHPHQWDU\ 6FKRRO7KHPHPRLQGLFDWHVQRFRQFHUQVIURPWKH6FKRRO'LVWULFWUHJDUGLQJFXUUHQWDQG IXWXUHRSHUDWLRQVDQGFRQGLWLRQVIRUVWXGHQWGURSRII (19,5210(17$/'(7(50,1$7,21
7KH5H,VVXHG)LQDO(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUWWRJHWKHUZLWKWKH'UDIW(,5 SXEOLVKHGLQ1RYHPEHUDQGWKH)LQDO(,5SXEOLVKHGLQ-XQHVKDOOFRQVWLWXWH WKH(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUW
(,5
SUHSDUHGSXUVXDQWWRWKH&DOLIRUQLD
(QYLURQPHQWDO4XDOLW\$FW
&(4$
&RSLHVRIWKH(,5ZHUHPDGHDYDLODEOHWRWKHSXEOLF
DWWKH/LYHUPRUH3ODQQLQJ'LYLVLRQDQGRQWKH&LW\¶VZHEVLWH 7KH'UDIW(,5DFNQRZOHGJHVWKHSHUPDQHQWORVVRIXSWRDFUHVRIQRQQDWLYHDQQXDO JUDVVODQGWKDWKDVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRVXSSRUWVHYHUDOVSHFLDOVWDWXVDQLPDOVSHFLHV

LQFOXGLQJ
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¶V%HDNLVDOVRSUHVHQWRQ WKDWSURSHUW\
133
ATTACHMENT 5
428
3DJH
(QYLURQPHQWDOSHUPLWVIURPDSSURSULDWH5HVRXUFH$JHQFLHVZLOOUHTXLUHWKHIROORZLQJ FRPSRQHQWVWRHQVXUHSURWHFWLRQRIWKHPLWLJDWLRQSURSHUW\LQSHUSHWXLW\ 
x 3HUPDQHQWFRQVHUYDWLRQHDVHPHQWKHOGE\DQRQSURILWWUXVWRURWKHURUJDQL]DWLRQ DSSURYHGE\WKH5HVRXUFH$JHQFLHVWRKROGHDVHPHQWV
x $ORQJWHUPPDQDJHPHQWSODQWKDWLQFOXGHVDQDQQXDOPDLQWHQDQFHDQG PRQLWRULQJFRVWFDOFXODWLRQDQG
x $QRQZDVWLQJHQGRZPHQWWRIXQGWKHORQJWHUPPDQDJHPHQWDQGPRQLWRULQJ FRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHORQJWHUPPDQDJHPHQWSODQ
7KH5H,VVXHG(,5LQFOXGHVDOLVWRIDOOPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHVWKDWZRXOGUHGXFHSRWHQWLDOO\ VLJQLILFDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWVWRDOHVVWKDQVLJQLILFDQWOHYHO$0LWLJDWLRQ0RQLWRULQJ DQG5HSRUWLQJ3URJUDPKDVEHHQSUHSDUHGZKLFKOLVWVHDFKPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUHWKH PHWKRGRIYHULILFDWLRQWKHWLPLQJRIYHULILFDWLRQDQGWKHDJHQF\UHVSRQVLEOHIRUYHULI\LQJ WKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKHPLWLJDWLRQPHDVXUH:LWKWKHLPSOHPHQWDWLRQRIWKHPLWLJDWLRQ PHDVXUHVWKH(,5FRQFOXGHVWKHSURMHFWZLOOQRWKDYHVLJQLILFDQWHQYLURQPHQWDOLPSDFWV ),6&$/$1'$'0,1,675$7,9(,03$&76
7KHGHYHORSPHQWRIWKHSURMHFWVLWHZLOOLQFUHDVHSURSHUW\YDOXDWLRQRIWKHYDFDQWSDUFHO UHVXOWLQJLQDQLQFUHDVHLQSURSHUW\WD[UHYHQXHWRWKH&LW\7KHSURMHFWZLOODOVREH VXEMHFWWRDSSOLFDEOHGHYHORSPHQWIHHVWKDWZLOOKHOSRIIVHWWKHILQDQFLDOLPSDFWVRIWKH QHZGHYHORSPHQW7KHUHYHQXHLQFUHDVHZLOOEHRIIVHWE\H[SHQGLWXUHVRQ&LW\VHUYLFHV VXFKDVSXEOLFVDIHW\DQGOLEUDU\VHUYLFHVWRVHUYHWKHQHZUHVLGHQWV$KRPHRZQHU¶V DVVRFLDWLRQZLOOEHUHVSRQVLEOHIRUWKHPDLQWHQDQFHRIWKHSULYDWHVWUHHWGHWHQWLRQEDVLQ DQGDOORSHQVSDFHDUHDV
LQFOXGLQJWUDLOV
$FRPPXQLW\IDFLOLWLHVGLVWULFWZLOOIXQG
PDLQWHQDQFHRIWKHHPHUJHQF\YHKLFOHDFFHVV
(9$
SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHEULGJH
$77$&+0(176
 /RFDWLRQ0DS
 'HYHORSPHQW3ODQV
 3URSRVHG0LWLJDWLRQ3DUFHO
 /HWWHUIURP/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\-RLQW8QLILHG6FKRRO'LVWULFW  (PDLOIURP/LYHUPRUH9DOOH\-RLQW8QLILHG6FKRRO'LVWULFW  6LPLODU'HYHORSPHQW3DWWHUQVLQ1RUWKHDVW/LYHUPRUH  &RQGLWLRQVRI$SSURYDO
 3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ5HVROXWLRQRI$SSURYDO

 3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ6WDII5HSRUW'HFHPEHU
 3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ'UDIW0HHWLQJ0LQXWHV'HFHPEHU  &LW\&RXQFLO5HVROXWLRQ1R
 /HWWHULQVXSSRUWIURPWKHSURSHUW\RZQHUQRWFRQWDLQHGLQWKH(,5GRFXPHQWV  /HWWHUVHPDLOVLQRSSRVLWLRQIURPWKHSXEOLFQRWFRQWDLQHGLQWKH(,5GRFXPHQWV *DUDYHQWD+LOOV(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW5HSRUWKDVEHHQDYDLODEOHIRUSXEOLFUHYLHZDWWKH IROORZLQJORFDWLRQVVLQFH$XJXVW

134
ATTACHMENT 5
429
3DJH
x /LYHUPRUH&LW\+DOO6RXWK/LYHUPRUH$YHQXH/LYHUPRUH&DOLIRUQLD 
x &LW\ZHEVLWH
KWWS
ZZZFLW\RIOLYHUPRUHQHWFLW\JRYFGGSODQQLQJJDUDYHQWDBKLOOVBILQDOBHLUKWP 3UHSDUHGE\

7XUKDQ6RQPH]
$VVRFLDWH3ODQQHU
$SSURYHGE\
  )LVFDO5HYLHZE\

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB  BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB  0DUF5REHUWV  'RXJODV$OHVVLR
&LW\0DQDJHU  $GPLQLVWUDWLYH6HUYLFHV'LUHFWRU
135
ATTACHMENT 5
430

ATTACHMENT 6
NOVEMBER 12, 2024 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION

PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 12, 2024
________________________________________________________________

SPECIAL MEETING

1. CALL TO ORDER – The meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chairperson Jacob Anderson at 7:00 pm, held in person at 1016 S.

Livermore Avenue.

2. ROLL CALL – Present: Chairperson Anderson, Vice-Chairperson Yolanda Fintschenko, Commissioner Steven Dunbar, Commissioner Daniel Leary, Commissioner Tracy Kronzak.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Chairperson Anderson led the Pledge of Allegiance.

3. SPECIAL MEETING ITEM

3.1 Hearing to consider a proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Site Plan Design Review for a 44-unit single-family residential subdivision (Garaventa Hills), consisting of 38 single-family detached units and 6 duet/couplet units and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

Special Projects Coordinator Steve Stewart presented the staff report.

David Ragland, President of Lafferty Communities and Applicant with Livermore LT Ventures, requested approval of the project; outlined the community outreach meetings, which led to reducing the unit count from 76 to 44, and providing affordable housing, reconfiguration of the vehicular bridge to a pedestrian bridge, additional trail connections, architectural designs to retain viewsheds; 70% open space; bioswale remediation; explained the original approval; introduced the project team; and requested recommendation of approval to the Council.

Alicia Guerra, Land Use Counsel for Lafferty, discussed the prior litigation and CEQA analysis; Recirculated Partial Draft EIR and Final EIR; the Courts questions of whether there was available funding to apply to preservation of the 431
PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Minutes OCTOBER 15, 2024
site as open space; analysis and State housing laws dictating inability to revert and establish the land as open space.

Chairperson Anderson opened the public comment period.

Michelle Mitchell, nearby resident, indicated opposition to the project and discussed the ten-year neighborhood opposition. She questioned the relevance of a ten-year old EIR; expressed concern with tearing up Bear Creek to install PG&E lines and Bear Creek as only the ingress and egress. She questioned the new homeowner’s ability to obtain fire insurance. She requested a direct contact person for construction impacts and indicated opposition to the trail behind her home.

Dennis Kai questioned whether the alkaline sink was reported to the Army Corp of Engineers and discussed the 2500 gallons of oil removed from storm water system. He expressed concern about the lack of service to the filtering system.

Daryl Reed, Bridal Path Court resident and founding member of Save the Hill, discussed years of opposition to the development; expressed concern with the reduction and reliability of PG&E, stability of power to accommodate additional homes, and increase in traffic and road safety.

Chairperson Anderson closed the public comment period.

Commissioner Leary discussed the Court of Appeals reversal of decision on the EIR in 2022 and the property has an unwilling seller and is therefore ineligibile for various funds to designate the land as open space. He indicated he could make the finding that preservation of the land as open space and no build alternative were not feasible. He discussed the Urban Low Residential Land Use designation, indicating the proposed project was within the allowable dwelling units per acre.

He confirmed that the project was consistent with Open Space Protection and Housing Element and protects urban growth boundary with infill development; and PUD requirements for maximum building height. He requested confirmation that the patios, balconies and decks were less than 7 feet wide; suggested the addition of a walkway on House 28A; and confirmation of the garage and building setbacks on Lot 5. He indicated the rear yard setbacks met PUD requirements, and the Community Character element by incorporating pedestrian oriented design features; and the water treatment before the arroyos, and monoliths consistent with the General Plan. He indicated he could make the EIR, General Plan and PUD findings.

Commissioner Dunbar stated there would be a point of contact for construction.

In response to Commissioner Dunbar, Mr. Stewart explained the required extra exploration to attempt to find oil upwelling which was not found; required oil interceptor; primary drainage area for the Springtown alkaline sink, and minor contribution of drainage to the adjacent wetlands by the site, and assurance that the stormwater flows would remain the same after development. He discussed mitigation measures related to traffic safety and the project’s contribution to eventual improvements at Laughlin and Northfront Road; and future traffic calming measures opportunities. Commissioner Dunbar discussed affordable housing in 432

ATTACHMENT 6
NOVEMBER 12, 2024 Draft Minutes PLANNING COMMISSION
lieu fees which were allowable per the Development Code, and not under the Planning Commission’s decision. He empathized with those losing fire insurance.

He indicated he could find the project met the requirements of the Recirculated Draft EIR, and that the Subdivision and Site Plan Design Review were appropriate and met the standards.

Commissioner Kronzak concurred with Commissioners Leary and Dunbar and commended staff on the briefings on questions regarding the applicability of CEQA and Court of Appeals. Commissioner Kronzak indicated the findings could be made and explained that there was no time limit on EIRs; the project was within the Urban Growth Boundary on an infill property, designed to be consistent with the existing developments in the area, the 2003 General Plan Zoning and Land Use, Commissioner Kronzak said project is also consistent with cluster development with regards to the livability objectives, inclusionary development ordinance, and provided variegated human scale design; concurred with the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 5, found consistent with the Livermore Development Code and standard mitigations; agreed with Staff findings that flooding was the result of downstream conditions, not the proposed project; and indicated satisfaction with the mitigation measures associated with the cumulative impacts evaluated by CEQA.

Vice Chair Fintschenko confirmed that the applicant had reapplied and the City was bound by law to consider the application. She indicated satisfaction with Staff’s response and analysis and Staff's recommendation to recommend the City Council find the Recirculated Partial EIR was complete, and that the project met the Zoning Codes.

Chair Anderson explained the Planning Commission’s responsibility to determine whether or not the project meets the legal standards, not make judgments about the project as a whole. He confirmed that the EIR’s findings and mitigation measures were otherwise deemed sufficient under CEQA by the courts and the Commission was only considering the no development alternative. He concurred with the findings of the other Commissioners and indicated the project was better due to the hard work between the community, staff, previous Commissions and previous Councils.

The Commission commended staff on the thorough staff report and community for its input.

ON THE MOTION OF COMMISSIONER KRONZAK, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR FINTSCHENKO, AND CARRIED ON A 5-0 VOTE, THE PLANNING

COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE THE FOLLOWING

ACTIONS TO AUTHORIZE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GARAVENTA HILLS RESIDENTIAL PROJECT:

1. ADOPT A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE EIR PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA); AND,
433
PLANNING COMMISSION Draft Minutes OCTOBER 15, 2024

2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUBDIVISION (SUB) 13-001 AND SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW (SPDR) 13-005, SUBJECT TO

CONDITIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE SIX

AFFORDABLE DUET UNITS AS PROPOSED AND TO MAKE AN

EQUIVALENCY PAYMENT TO SATISFY THE REMAINING FRACTIONAL PORTION OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENT; AND,

3. DIRECT THE PLANNING MANAGER TO FILE A NOTICE OF

DETERMINATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, SUBJECT TO
PROJECT APPROVAL.

4. ADJOURNMENT – at 8:16 pm to a Regular Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, November 19, 2024, at 7:00 pm, Civic Center Meeting Hall, City Council Chambers, 1016 S. Livermore Ave.
434
RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE

GARAVENTA HILLS PROJECT AND ADOPTING CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT FINDINGS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
On July 27, 2011, the City received an application to develop a single-family residential subdivision on the site located east of North Vasco Road, North of Garaventa Ranch Road/Altamont Creek Drive, and West of Laughlin Road. The application included a General Plan Amendment to change the designation to Urban Low Medium Residential (2-3 dwelling units per acre) in order to enable the continued density transfer envisioned under the Maralisa development, a Vesting Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the site, and Site Plan Design Review for the landscaping, architecture, and improvements.

The City determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) would be prepared for the aforementioned applications for the Garaventa Hills project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

On November 18, 2011, the City issued a Notice of Preparation (NOP) pursuant to CEQA to obtain comments on the proposed scope of the EIR for the Garaventa Hills project.

On December 7, 2011, the City held a public scoping meeting for public agencies, organizations, and members of the public to review the proposed project and provide comments on the scope of the environmental review process.

On November 8, 2012, a Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) was issued, including notices to interested groups and individuals for a 45-day public comment period. A Notice of Completion of the Draft EIR, public comment period, and hearing date was published in a newspaper of general circulation pursuant to CEQA.

On December 4, 2012, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft EIR for the initial proposal. The initial proposal was for 76 homes with a second access via an extension of Hawk Street and new bridge across Altamont Creek. The proposal included a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Urban Low Residential, at 1-1.5 dwelling units per acre, to Urban Low Medium Residential, at 2-3 dwelling units per acre.

On December 26, 2012, the public comment period on the Draft EIR was closed. The applicant made the changes listed below to the Garaventa Hills project before review and consideration by the Planning Commission:
 Reduction in the number of units from 76 to 47;
435
RESOLUTION NO. ________
 Elimination of the Hawk Street connection and bridge over Altamont Creek;  Preservation of the rock outcrop in the northwest corner of the site; and  Provision of an additional 1-story floor plan and a 1½-story floor plan.

The Draft EIR includes two alternatives to the original proposal: Alternative A:

No Project, No Development Alternative; and Alternative B: Reduced Density, Current General Plan Allowance Alternative. Alternative A assumes no development of the site.

Alternative B assumes development of the site consistent with the current General Plan designation of Urban Low Density (UL-1) at 1-1.5 dwelling units per acre. After considering public comments on the Draft EIR and the statements given by neighboring homeowners during the Citizens Forums at a number of Planning Commission and City Council meetings, the applicant chose to proceed with developing the site generally consistent with the Alternative B.

On June 11, 2014, a Final EIR was distributed consisting of copies of all written and oral comments, a list of commenters, all responses to oral and written comments, and an appendix containing minor corrections of the Draft EIR. A notice of the Final EIR availability and certification recommendation hearing date was published in a newspaper of general circulation.

On July 1, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council deny the proposed project. Generally, the Commission’s recommendation was due to the project’s extensive grading, unknown aesthetic context, and concern from the Livermore Area Recreation and Park District regarding compatibility with the adjacent Garaventa Preserve.

On June 3, 2015, the City received revised plans for the Garaventa Hills Project.  Replacing a portion of roadway with an Emergency Vehicle Access in order to reduce grading;
 Eliminating new landscaping between the Project site and the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve to preserve the natural grassland condition;
 Providing a drain system to collect all runoff from the residential lots and convey it to the treatment basin to protect the soil chemistry in the Garaventa Wetlands Preserve;
 Constructing a pedestrian/bicycle path that connects to the existing trail south of Bear Creek Drive to link the Project to Altamont Creek Park; and  Providing visual simulations of the Project in context with the surrounding developed and natural environments.

On August 18, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council to certify the Final EIR. The Livermore Planning Commission found that the Final EIR had been completed in compliance with the intent and requirements of the CEQA statute, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s local CEQA requirements and that the Final EIR reflected the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission of the City of Livermore. Based on the above 436
RESOLUTION NO. ________
findings, the Planning Commission recommended certification of the Garaventa Hills Final EIR, subject to final review and consideration by the City Council for approval.

On September 14, 2015, the City Council directed the project be returned to the Planning Commission and staff with direction for the project to be more subordinate to the natural landforms and provide alternatives for emergency vehicle and pedestrian circulation. The City Council took no action concerning the Final EIR.

On August 25, 2018, a Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report was made available for public review at City Hall and on the City’s website, along with the Final EIR and Draft EIR. Two (2) public notices concerning the documents’ availability were provided via mail for properties located within 1,320 feet of the project site, and published in a local distribution newspaper, on August 25, 2018, and on November 24, 2018. The 2018 ReIssued Final EIR contains an assessment of the 2018 Revised Project, which proposed 44 residential units and a pedestrian bridge connection to Hawk Street. The responses to comments were reassessed in light of the 2018 Revised Project and revisions to the responses are provided as appropriate. None of the revisions or other information contained in the Re-Issued Final EIR were “significant new information” under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and therefore no recirculation of the Draft EIR was required.

On December 4, 2018, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider a recommendation to the City Council to certify the Re-Issued Final EIR and approve the 2018 Revised Project. The Livermore Planning Commission found that the Re-Issued Final EIR had been completed in compliance with the intent and requirements of the CEQA statute, CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s local CEQA requirements and that the Final EIR reflected the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission of the City of Livermore. Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the 2018 Revised Project and certification of the Garaventa Hills Re-Issued Final EIR, subject to final review and consideration to the City Council for approval.

On April 22, 2019, the City Council of the City of Livermore, California, adopted Resolution No. 2019-050, certifying the Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report (RFEIR) and adopting Findings and Facts in Support of Findings Regarding the Final Environmental Impact Report and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Garaventa Hills Project.

Also on April 22, 2019, the City Council of the City of Livermore, California, adopted Resolution No. 2019-051, approving a Vesting Tentative Tract Map (8094) and Site Plan Design Review (13-005) for the Garaventa Hills 2018 Revised Project.

On May 23, 2019, an unincorporated association called Save The Hill Group filed a petition for writ of mandate pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in Alameda County Superior Court.
437
RESOLUTION NO. ________
On September 23, 2020, the Alameda County Superior Court entered a judgment denying Save The Hill Group’s petition.

On November 23, 2020, Save the Hill Group appealed the superior court’s judgment to the Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District.

On March 30, 2022, the First Appellate District Court of Appeal issued a decision reversing the superior court’s judgment in part, finding Save the Hill Group adequately exhausted its claims regarding the inadequacy of the “no project” alternative analyzed in the RFEIR and that the City violated CEQA by failing to sufficiently consider and analyze in the no project alternative the feasibility of permanently preserving the Garaventa Hills Project site as open space using funds from either the Altamont Landfill Settlement Agreement or the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement. The Court of Appeal otherwise affirmed the RFEIR’s compliance with CEQA in all other respects.

On September 26, 2022, the Alameda County Superior Court issued a writ of mandate ordering the City to (1) vacate and set aside its certification of the RFEIR and approval of the project within 60 days of the service of the writ and (2) to make an initial return to the writ demonstrating compliance with this first command of the writ within 75 days of service of the writ.

Also on September 26, 2022, the Alameda County Superior Court entered an amended order and judgment as to the need to analyze potential preservation of the Project site as open space in the revised EIR’s no project alternative analysis before considering whether to reapprove the Garaventa Hills Project.

On November 28, 2022, the City Council of the City of Livermore, California, adopted Resolution No.2022-193 rescinding the Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan Design Review, Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report, Facts in Support of Findings Regarding the Final Environmental Impact Report, and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Garaventa Hills Project.

On March 13, 2023, the City Council adopted the 2023 to 2031 Livermore Housing Element, providing adequate sites to support CA’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) requirements. On April 10, 2023, the applicant exercised their right to bring the Garaventa Hills project back for review by the City. The proposed project is the same project reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on December 4, 2018, and approved by the City Council on April 22, 2019.

On July 30, 2024, the City issued a Notice of Availability of a Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RP Draft EIR) and Notice of a Public Hearing inviting public comment on the RP Draft EIR for a 45-day period extending from July 30, 2024, to September 13, 2024.

On August 20, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing at which time oral and written comments were presented to the Planning Commission. 438
RESOLUTION NO. ________
Members of the public and other interested parties were invited by formal public notice to testify at the public hearing.

On September 13, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. the public comment period on the Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report (RP Final EIR) was closed. The City received 12 written comment letters from various agencies, organizations, and members of the public, and four verbal comments from members of the public.

On November 8, 2024, the RP Final EIR was distributed consisting of copies of all written and oral comments, a list of commenters, and all responses to oral and written comments, and minor corrections to the Draft EIR and a minor modification to Mitigation Measure Bio-9.

On November 12, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public meeting to consider the Project and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend the City Council certify the Project’s EIR and approve the Project.

On November 25, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project, Planning Commission and staff recommendations, all public comments and testimony, and findings.

The Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report, together with the Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report published in August 2024, as well as the prior EIR documents that include the original Draft EIR (November 2012, SCH#2011112045), Final EIR (June 2014), and Re-Issued Final EIR (August 2018) shall constitute the EIR for the proposed Garaventa Hills Project (“Project”) in Livermore, California.

Together with this resolution, the City Council considered a resolution for Vesting Tentative Tract (VTTM 8094) – Subdivision 13-001 and Site Plan Design Review (SPDR) 13-005
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that prior to taking action on the Project, and at a properly noticed public meeting, the City Council reviewed written and oral staff reports, conducted a public hearing on the Project and took testimony, and received into the record all pertinent documents related to the Project (collectively, the “Record Evidence”). The City Council’s determination is based on the Record Evidence, which is incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it has considered the findings made in Planning Commission Resolution No. 36-24, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the City Council hereby adopts the same findings by this reference and incorporates them as their own findings as part of this resolution. 439
RESOLUTION NO. ________
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that the EIR has been presented to the City Council, and based upon its own independent review of the Record Evidence and considerations, the City Council finds that the EIR (SCH No. 2011112045) has been completed in compliance with the intent and requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City’s local CEQA requirements, that the Council has considered the information contained in the EIR and the record prior to taking any action on the Project, other related Project actions, or any of the alternatives, and the EIR reflects the City’s and Council’s independent judgment and analysis. The City Council hereby certifies the EIR, attached hereto as Exhibit B, and approves and adopts the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings Regarding the Environmental Impact Report, attached hereto as Exhibit C.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit D, which is incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that it hereby directs the Planning Manager to file a Notice of Determination with the Alameda County Clerk, if the project is approved.

The documents that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based can be found in the Community Development Department, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, in Livermore, California.

On the motion by Council Member______________________, seconded by Council Member ____________________, the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at the City Council meeting of November 25, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Katherine Mirassou
Deborah L. Elam Katherine Mirassou
City Clerk Deputy City Attorney
Exhibit A – Planning Commission Resolution No. 36-24
Exhibit B – Environmental Impact Report for the Garaventa Hills Project Exhibit C – Findings, Facts in Support of Findings Regarding the Environmental Impact Report for the Garaventa Hills Project
Exhibit D – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Garaventa Hills Project 440

EXHIBIT A
441

EXHIBIT A
442

EXHIBIT A
443

EXHIBIT A
444

EXHIBIT A
445

EXHIBIT A
446

GARAVENTA HILLS PROJECT
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
SCH No. 2011112045
City of Livermore
Planning Division
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550

L A M P H I E R - G R E G O R Y
U R B A N P L A N N I N G , E N V I R O N M E N T A L A N A L Y S I S & P R O JE C T M A N A G E M E N T | 5 1 0 . 5 3 5 . 6 6 9 0 November 2024

EXHIBIT B
447
Garaventa Hills Environmental Impact Report
2012 Draft Environmental Impact Report
2014 Final Environmental Impact Report
2018 Re-Issued Final Environmental Impact Report
2024 Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report 2024 Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report

EXHIBIT B
448
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP-i
Contents
Page
Chapter RP5: RP Final EIR Introduction
Purpose of the Final EIR...................................................................................................................RP5-1 Background......................................................................................................................................RP5-1 EIR Review Process..........................................................................................................................RP5-3 Chapter RP6: Response to Comments
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................RP6-1 List of Comments.............................................................................................................................RP6-1 Master Responses ...........................................................................................................................RP6-2 Responses to Specific Comments..................................................................................................RP6-12 Chapters RP1 through RP4 can be found in the RP Draft EIR.

EXHIBIT B
449
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP5-1
RP5
RP Final EIR Introduction

PURPOSE OF THE FINAL EIR
The California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder (together “CEQA”) require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be prepared for any project which may have a significant impact on the environment. An EIR is an informational document, the purposes of which, according to CEQA (Public Resource Code Section 21061, et. seq.) are “to provide public agencies and the public in general with detailed information about the effect which a proposed project is likely to have on the environment; to list ways in which the significant effects of such a project might be minimized; and to indicate alternatives to such a project.”
This Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report (RP Final EIR), together with the Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RP Draft EIR) published in August 2024, as well as the prior EIR documents that include the original Draft EIR (November 2012, SCH#2011112045), Final EIR (June 2014), and Re-Issued Final EIR (August 2018) shall constitute the EIR for the proposed Garaventa Hills Project (“Project”) in Livermore, California. The Project Applicant is Livermore LT Ventures I Group, LLC. The Lead Agency is the City of Livermore.

BACKGROUND

PRIOR EIR CERTIFICATION
The City of Livermore circulated a Draft EIR for the Project in November 2012 (SCH#2011112045) for public review and comment and public comment was received between November 18, 2012, and December 26, 2012.

The City received public comments on the Draft EIR and prepared a Final EIR that was released to the public in June 2014.

The applicant then revised the Project to be consistent with the Reduced Density Alternative analyzed in the Draft EIR. To document the changes in the Project that reflected the Reduced Density Alternative and to evaluate the impacts of those changes, the City prepared a Re-Issued Final EIR that was released to the public for review in August 2018.

The EIR was certified by the Livermore City Council on April 22, 2019, and the City Council approved the Project as a 44-unit single family subdivision.

LEGAL CHALLENGE AND DECISION
On May 23, 2019, Save the Hill Group filed a petition for writ of mandate challenging the City's certification of the EIR and approval of the Project. The Superior Court of the County of Alameda denied Save the Hill Group's petition. Save the Hill Group appealed, and the Court of Appeals reversed the

EXHIBIT B
450
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
Page RP5-2 Garaventa Hills Project
Superior Court's decision with respect to one issue. The appellate court ruled that the EIR was inadequate because the EIR failed to include sufficient information regarding the potential availability of funding for open space acquisition and preservation of the Project site in the no project alternative analysis. The appellate court affirmed the sufficiency of the EIR on all other issues.1

In accordance with the appellate court's order, the Livermore City Council rescinded certification of the EIR and approval of the Project on November 28, 2022.

RECIRCULATED PARTIAL DRAFT EIR
As stated in the RP Draft EIR, the applicant has exercised their right to bring the Project back for review by the City, which required revising the EIR to address the inadequacies identified by the Court of Appeal.

Recirculation of an EIR to address a limited issue is not grounds to revisit issues laid to rest in prior analysis upheld by the Court. Therefore, consistent with the Court of Appeal’s decision, the RP Draft EIR was limited to recirculation of the discussion of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative. The RP Draft EIR concluded on the basis of substantial evidence that:
“The property owner is not a willing seller. Without a willing seller, the Project site has been determined not to be eligible for funding through the Altamont Landfill Open Space Fund or the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement funds.
“Use of eminent domain to acquire the property from an unwilling seller, if it could be defended legally, would be costly (over $17-25 million) and contrary to the City’s past practice. There are other funding sources available for an eminent domain approach, including the Open Space Acquisition and Management Fund, Transferable Development Credits Fund, and/or General Fund allocation (if authorized by voters through ballot initiatives/bond measures); however, these funds are either not eligible to be used for the Project site or are prioritized elsewhere. “Additionally, the Project site has a long-established residential designation, and is identified in the current Livermore General Plan Housing Element site inventory as a site for residential development. Under the No Net Loss provisions of state housing laws, additional process would be required to remove the Project site from the Housing Element’s residential development site inventory, which could add additional cost to the acquisition of the site for open space preservation. “Alternative A: No Project, No Development represents the possibility that the Project site would be preserved as open space. As discussed above, the potential funding sources for such open space acquisition and preservation have been explored and it has been concluded that the site is either ineligible for use of those funds due to an unwilling seller or would require legally-complicated and cost-prohibitive fair market value eminent domain proceedings and use of funds prioritized elsewhere.
“The analysis and evidence cited above can support a conclusion by the lead agency that Alternative A: No Project, No Development involving site acquisition and preservation as open space is not a 1 Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1092, review denied (July 13, 2022). Available at:
https://www.livermoreca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/10739/638297013821830000

EXHIBIT B
451
Chapter RP5: RP Final EIR Introduction
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP5-3
“feasible” alternative the lead agency is compelled to adopt.2, 3 The lead agency will take this evidence and analysis into account when making the findings required by CEQA regarding the feasibility of Alternative A: No Project, No Development. “ There were no other changes to the information or conclusions in the prior EIR documents.

EIR REVIEW PROCESS

RP DRAFT EIR
The RP Draft EIR was made available for a 45-day public review period, from July 30, 2024, through September 13, 2024. During the review period for the RP Draft EIR, the City received written comments and verbal comments at a hearing on August 20, 2024.

RP FINAL EIR
This RP Final EIR consists of the following chapters, commencing after Chapter RP4 of the RP Draft EIR:

Chapter RP5: Introduction to the RP Final EIR. This chapter outlines the purpose, organization and scope of the RP Final EIR document and important information regarding the public review and approval process.

Chapter RP6: Response to Comments. This chapter includes comments received during the RP Draft EIR review period and responses to those comments.

City officials have considered all comments and concluded that there is no “significant new information” under section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; therefore, no further recirculation of the EIR is required.

The RP Draft EIR focused only on additional discussion of the potential funding sources available for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under Alternative A: No Project, No Development. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(f)(2), the RP Draft EIR and associated notification requested reviewers limit the scope of their comments to portions of the EIR that were revised and recirculated and this RP Final EIR addresses comments on the recirculated portion contained in the RP Draft EIR. All other topics and related comments were addressed in the Final EIR and Re-Issued Final EIR. Nonetheless, City officials have considered all comments.

An EIR does not control the agency’s ultimate discretion on the Project. In accordance with California law, the EIR must be certified before any action on the Project can be taken. However, EIR certification does not constitute Project approval.
2 CEQA Guidelines Sections 15126.6(f)(i); 15091(a)(3).
3 See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957, 1001 (assessing alternatives feasibility, "involves a balancing of various 'economic, environmental, social, and technological factors”; “'feasibility' under CEQA encompasses 'desirability' to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, and technological factors” [internal citations omitted]).

EXHIBIT B
452
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
Page RP5-4 Garaventa Hills Project
This page intentionally left blank.

EXHIBIT B
453
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP6-1
RP6

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

INTRODUCTION
This chapter contains responses to the comments on the RP Draft EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15088.

The City of Livermore received 12 letters/emails from persons or groups commenting on the RP Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Project, in addition to verbal comment at the August 20, 2024, Planning Commission meeting.

Specific comments are organized in chronological order by grouping, as follows:

LIST OF COMMENTS

LETTERS/EMAIL FROM AGENCIES/UTILITIES
Letter A, Plan Review Team, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 8/1/2024 Letter B, Vince Fazzi, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 9/11/2024

LETTERS/EMAIL FROM PERSONS AND GROUPS
Letter C, Gil Colgate, 8/3/2024
Letter D, Tina Simms, 8/4/2024
Letter E, Julia M., 8/10/2024
Letter F, Janelle Plaskett, 8/19/2024
Letter G, Doug Mann, Citizens for Balanced Growth, 9/12/2024 Letter H, Donna Cabanne, 9/13/2024
Letter I, Wes Eacret and Emma Olenberger, 9/13/2024
Letter J, Alicia Guerra, Lafferty Communities, 9/13/2024 Letter K, Michelle Mitchell and Paul Maciolek, 9/13/2024 Letter L, Bianca Covarelli, 9/14/2024

PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING
Comment set PC contains a transcript of the verbal comments on the RP Draft EIR from the City of Livermore Planning Commission hearing held on August 20, 2024.

EXHIBIT B
454
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
Page RP6-2 Garaventa Hills Project

MASTER RESPONSES
Certain topics were raised in multiple comments. The following Master Responses address these repeated topics and will be referenced as appropriate in response to specific comments.

Master Response 1: Non-Environmental Considerations
Many comments were received that relate to issues that are not considered part of the environmental analysis. Under CEQA, “’Environment’ means the physical conditions that exist within the area which will be affected by a proposed project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, noise, or objects of historic or aesthetic significance.” (CEQA Guidelines, section 21060.5)
This document is part of the Environmental Impact Report for the Project and therefore is limited in focus to issues related to the physical environment. Identification of a comment as being non-environmental is intended to explain why this environmental document is not the appropriate forum for response to that particular comment. Such an indication is not intended to diminish the importance of the comment, as the environmental analysis is only one element for consideration of project approvals by City decision-makers. All of the comments included in this document have been shared with City staff. Staff has analyzed all comments to confirm that none contain “significant new information” requiring recirculation of the EIR. All comments, along with responses from relevant City departments, will be shared with the decision-makers for them to take into account when making decisions regarding the proposed Project.

Master Response 2: Scope for Recirculation of an EIR
A number of comments reference CEQA Guidelines section 15162 (either specifically or by utilizing the criteria contained in that section in their arguments), which lists the conditions under which a Subsequent EIR would need to be prepared following certification of a prior EIR.

In accordance with the appellate court's order, certification of the EIR for the Project was rescinded. The provisions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, Recirculation of an EIR Prior to Certification apply to the RP EIR because the EIR has not yet been certified; and therefore, the criteria for determining whether a Subsequent EIR should be prepared (CEQA Guidelines section 15162) are procedurally inapplicable at this time.

The proposed Project is the same as previously proposed. No changes or modifications have been proposed. As detailed below, the Court of Appeal upheld the adequacy of the EIR on all issues other than the discussion of the potential funding sources available for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space under the No Project, No Development Alternative and the RP EIR was not required to re-open the EIR’s other analyses. Although issues beyond the scope of the limited recirculation are not required to be addressed in the RP EIR, references to pertinent information in the Draft EIR, the Final EIR, Re-Issued Final EIR, and RP Draft EIR have been provided in the response to specific comments for informational purposes. All feasible mitigation measures imposed to mitigate environmental impacts in all resource areas have been and will continue to be included and proposed as binding upon the Applicant and the City as part of any recommended decision for reconsideration of the Project.

EXHIBIT B
455
Chapter RP6: Response to Comments
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP6-3
The City Council of the City of Livermore certified the EIR (note that the court documents use “RFEIR” to refer to the whole of the EIR documents in the referenced quotes) and approved the Project on April 22, 2019. Save the Hill Group filed a lawsuit alleging that numerous aspects of the EIR failed to comply with CEQA. The Superior Court denied the Save the Hill Group’s petition for writ of mandate in its entirety.

The Save the Hill Group appealed the Superior Court’s judgment. On March 30, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal reversed the Superior Court’s judgment only with respect to the EIR’s no project alternative analysis, otherwise affirming the sufficiency of the EIR on all other challenged issues. The Court of Appeal directed the Superior Court to:
“(1) vacate its order denying Save the Hill's challenge by way of petition for writ of mandate to the RFEIR's no-project alternative analysis; (2) enter a modified order and a modified judgment consistent with our opinion that Save the Hill's challenge to the no-project alternative analysis was both preserved and meritorious; and (3) issue a peremptory writ of mandate directing the City to set aside the certification of the RFEIR and approval of the Project.”1

On September 26, 2022, the Superior Court ordered the certification of the EIR and the Project’s approval be set aside. The order directed the City, should it choose to consider the project again, to “first prepare an EIR with ‘relevant’ information in the ‘no-project alternative evaluation regarding the feasibility of acquiring Garaventa Hills to conserve it as open space.’”2 The Superior Court upheld the EIR against all other claims, and issued a writ providing for ongoing jurisdiction subject to Public Resources Code section 21168.9(c).3
When a court issues a writ of mandate directing that an EIR be supplemented or corrected, this “does not mean the Agency is required to start the EIR process anew.” Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1112; see also Lotus v. Dept. of Transportation (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 645, 658. “Rather, the Agency need only correct the deficiency in the EIR . . . before considering recertification of the EIR.” Protect the Historic Amador Waterways, 116 Cal.App.4th at 1112. CEQA is designed specifically to avoid “endless rounds of revision and recirculation of EIR[s].” Silverado Modjeska Recreation and Park District v. County of Orange (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 282, 303 (“Silverado Modjeska”). A writ in a CEQA action directs “the public agency take specific action as may be necessary to bring the determination, finding, or decision into compliance with [CEQA].” CEQA § 21168.9(a)(3) (emphasis added). The fact that additional environmental assessment is conducted for a limited issue “is not an occasion to revisit environmental concerns laid to rest in the original analysis.” Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 949. This principle applies with full force when an EIR has been de-certified and additional environmental assessment has been required for a specific reason. See, e.g., Silverado Modjeska, 197 Cal.App.4th at 297; see also Ione Valley Land, Air, & Water Def. All., LLC v. County of Amador (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 165, 170 (citing Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 296, 324-27). Further, the CEQA Guidelines expressly authorizes a lead agency to recirculate only selected portions of an EIR rather than open all topical areas for further recirculation. CEQA Guidelines, §15088.5(c), (f).
1 Save the Hill Group v. City of Livermore (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 1092, 1118, review denied (July 13, 2022). 2 Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG19020186, Order Vacating Prior Order and Granting Petition for Writ of Mandate, (Sept. 26, 2022), at 2.
3 Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG19020186, Judgment, (Sept. 26, 2022), at 1; Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, Case No. RG19020186, Peremptory Writ of Mandate, (Sept. 26, 2022), at 2.

EXHIBIT B
456
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
Page RP6-4 Garaventa Hills Project
The standard for recirculation is whether “significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the draft EIR for public review under Section 15087 but before certification.” CEQA Guidelines § 15088.5(a). “[R]ecirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR ‘merely clarifies or amplifies . . . or makes insignificant modifications in . . . an adequate EIR.” Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (“Laurel Heights”) (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1129–30, as modified on denial of reh'g (Feb. 24, 1994) (citations omitted). “[R]ecirculation is only required when the information added to the EIR changes the EIR in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure that would clearly reduce such an effect and that the project's proponents have declined to implement.”4

Consistent with the Court of Appeal’s order, and with the CEQA Guidelines, the RP Draft EIR recirculated for public comment a version of the alternatives analysis which analyzes the issue of the potential for the acquisition and preservation of the Project site as open space. Adding this analysis was the only thing the court held would be necessary to bring the EIR into compliance with CEQA.

No information added shows any new or substantially increased environmental impact. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15088.5(a)(1), (a)(2). The EIR’s impact conclusions remain unchanged, and the new analysis does not identify mitigation measures that the Project applicant has declined to implement or that result in a new significant environmental impact. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15088.5(a)(1), (a)(3). Further, the Court of Appeal did not conclude that the previously circulated “draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded.” CEQA Guidelines, §15088.5(a)(4). To the contrary, the court found only a limited error. No commenter has pointed to any reason that the information that has been added to the EIR trigger the standards in CEQA Guidelines §15088.5 that would require further recirculation. As such, the lead agency’s determination not to further recirculate other portions of the EIR is supported by substantial evidence and consistent with CEQA.

As noted above, all comments have been shared with the City’s expert staff, including the City’s Planning Director and City Engineer. Staff have reviewed all comments raised and considered whether any issues raised demonstrate the existence of “significant new information” and concluded that none of the comments show such “significant new information.” Specifically, the City Engineer has reviewed all comments related to flooding and hydrocarbons and confirmed in a memorandum below that no comments demonstrate any new or increased significant impacts beyond those analyzed in the previously circulated EIR. In addition, going beyond the requirements of CEQA, the City’s commissioned expert biologist has independently confirmed in a memorandum below that there are no new listings in the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) regarding endangered species. The biologist’s memorandum confirms that a modest revision to Mitigation Measure Bio-9 can address any impacts on any species whose listing status has changed since the Re-Issued Final EIR. Mitigation Measure Bio-9 is hereby revised as follows:

Bio-9: Conduct a pre-construction surveys for western spadefoot toad and western pond turtle.

A s Surveys for western spadefoot toad and western pond turtle shall be conducted by a qualified biologist a maximum of one week prior to construction. The survey should include the potential breeding habitat of both species and an area within 50 feet of that habitat. If a 4 Laurel Heights Improvement Assn., 6 Cal.4th at 1120.

EXHIBIT B
457
Chapter RP6: Response to Comments
Garaventa Hills Project Page RP6-5
western spadefoot toad or a western pond turtle is found, the biologist shall move it to suitable habitat in a safe location outside of the construction zone. In the event that a western spadefoot toad or western pond turtle is observed within an active construction zone, the contractor shall temporarily halt construction activities until a biologist has moved the toad or turtle to a safe location outside the construction zone, within similar habitat. In the event the western spadefoot toad and/or western pond turtle are officially listed by the USFWS the Project applicant shall obtain authorization from USFWS for potential take of these species and implement all measures specified in the authorizations obtained from USFWS. Such measures are expected to be similar to those described for Mitigation Measure Bio-4c.

These memoranda are included as part of this response to comments below.

Comments raising issues or questions with respect to the originally prepared EIR cannot require revisitation of that analysis. See, e.g., Ione Valley, 33 Cal.App.5th at 170. To the extent any of the comments raise issues based on facts arising after the Re-Issued Final EIR, these comments also do not present significant new information that warrant revisiting the prior analyses, either under the “recirculation” standard or, to the extent applicable, the standard for preparing a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21092.1, 21166; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15088.5, 15162, 15163.

Specifically, there have been no changes to the project. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162(a)(1). The proposed project is the same project previously analyzed. There have been no changes to the environmental setting or circumstances that require “major revisions” to the EIR, because there is no evidence of any “new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.” CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a)(2). Finally, there is no new information “which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified” showing new or more severe project impacts nor newly feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that the applicant has declined to adopt. CEQA Guidelines, §15162(a)(3).

Therefore, the lead agency’s decision not to further recirculate, and not to prepare any further supplemental or subsequent EIR review, is supported by substantial evidence and consistent with CEQA.

EXHIBIT B
458

CITY OF

INTE ROFFICE MEMORANDU M
Date: November 5, 2024
To: Stephen Riley, Planning Manager
Steve Stewart, Special Projects Coordinator
From: Joel Waxdeck, City Engineer 9u.

Subject: Review of Public Comments Regarding Flood Risk and Hydrocarbons Related to the Garaventa Hills Project
I have reviewed the comments, particularly those related to flood risk and hydrocarbons, submitted during the public comment period for the Garaventa Hills Recirculated Partial Draft Environmental Impact Report (RP Draft EIR). The information included in the comments is not new information showing any new or increased impacts of the Garaventa Hills Project (Project). The Project includes design features, Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval to address potential project impacts related to all impact areas, including flooding and the presence of hydrocarbons.

Flooding
Flooding is a local concern for the City of Livermore, and it is also a regional issue requiring regional solutions. The following are City and regional plans that are being implemented to reduce the risk of flooding citywide:

Regional
• Zone 7 Flood Management Plan
https://www.zone7water.com/post/flood-management-plan-1 • Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Local
• Stream Maintenance Program
• Capital Improvement Program - storm water improvements • Tri-Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
Recirculated Partial Final Environmental Impact Report
Page RP6-6 Garaventa Hills Project

EXHIBIT B
459
November 5, 2024

Page 2 of 3 ends
← All documents from this meeting