Livermore City Council
May 11, 2026

(b) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for “design professional services” defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then Consultant’s duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e)

12. Insurance. Without limiting Consultant’s indemnification of the Indemnified Parties, Consultant shall procure and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement policies of insurance in the amounts and under the terms set forth in Exhibit C Insurance Requirements against claims and Liability that may arise from or in connection with this Agreement and performance of the Services. Upon reasonable written notice, Consultant shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to-time by City’s Risk Manager.

13. Force Majeure; Service Delays. Should Consultant’s performance of the Services be obstructed or delayed due to changes in the Services by City, by any default, act, or omission of City, or by strikes, fire, earthquake, or any other Act of God, or by the inability to obtain goods, materials, equipment, or labor due to federal government restrictions arising out of defense or war programs, then Consultant’s time for performance may, at City’s sole discretion, be extended for such periods as may be agreed upon by City and Consultant. Nothing in this section restricts City’s authority in Section 6 to terminate this Agreement.

14. Acceptance of Final Payment. Consultant’s acceptance of final payment will release City from any and all claims and liabilities for compensation under this Agreement.

15. Acceptance of Work. City’s acceptance of, or payment to Consultant for, the Services does not release Consultant from its responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or competency of the Services, nor do the actions constitute an assumption of Consultant’s responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services.

16. Conflict of Interest. Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a financial interest in Consultant. Consultant shall not offer, encourage, or accept any financial interest in any part of Consultant's business by or from a City employee or official during the term of this Agreement or as a result of being awarded this Agreement. If any of the Services are paid by reimbursement from an agreement between City and a private party, Consultant represents that it has not performed any work for that private party during the twelve-month period prior to the execution of this Agreement, and that it shall not negotiate, offer, or accept any contract for services from that party during the term of this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 6 of 24
186

17. Economic Disclosure. Consultant shall comply with City’s local conflict of interest code implementing the California Political Reform Act, and shall prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if the Services involve making, or participation in making, governmental decisions or financial decisions by City that may have a material effect on Consultant’s financial interests as determined by the City Attorney’s Office.

While it is Consultant’s sole responsibility to evaluate its conflicts of interest, Consultant nevertheless agrees to prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if requested by City.

18. Levine Act Compliance. California Government Code section 84308 (Levine Act) prohibits City officers from participating in any action related to a contract, license, permit, or entitlement if the officer receives political contributions from a party, or participant, or agent thereof, that totals more than $500 within the twelve months preceding the decision or within the twelve months following the date of the final decision.

Consultant shall review and complete as necessary the City’s California Levine Act Disclosure Statement that can be obtained from the City Clerk.

19. Use of Recycled Products. If fitness and quality are equal, then Consultant shall utilize recycled products consistent with the City’s Environmentally Preferrable Purchasing and Practices Policy, and as defined in California Public Contract Code Section 12200 for the Services, instead of nonrecycled products whenever recycled products are available at the same or a lesser cost than nonrecycled items. Information on recycled materials can be found here:
• Sustainable Purchasing | StopWaste - Home, Work, School • Reducing Waste at Work | StopWaste - Home, Work, School • Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing | US EPA

20. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive. City reserves the right to provide, and to retain other qualified consultants to provide, services that are the same or similar to the Services.

21. Business Entity Status. Consultant is responsible for filling all required documents and forms with the California Secretary of State and meeting all requirements of the Franchise Tax Board, as well as the California Business and Professions Code and any other state statute, to the extent such requirements apply to Consultant to provide the Services. By entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is: authorized to do business in California; in good standing with the California Secretary of State; and, in good standing with all agencies having jurisdiction over Consultant, including any licensing agencies. If Consultant is a suspended entity at the time it enters into this Agreement, City may take steps to void this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 7 of 24
187

22. Authority to Execute Agreement. Consultant has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution of this Agreement, and expressly represents that the person signing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant has received and accepted the authority to sign and execute this Agreement on behalf of Consultant. Upon the Effective Date, this Agreement shall constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of Consultant, enforceable against Consultant in accordance with its terms, which authorization is ratified and confirmed upon Consultant’s acceptance of the first compensation payment by City.

23. No Subcontracting and No Assignment. Consultant’s unique personal competence, experience, specialized personal knowledge, and professional reputation were a substantial inducement to City for the award of this Agreement to Consultant, therefore no part of the Services may be assigned or subcontracted without City’s prior written consent. For the purposes of this section, a change of fifty percent or more in the ownership or control of Consultant constitutes an assignment.

24. Remedies. All remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, are cumulative and alternative, and the invocation of a right or remedy will not be construed to waive or elect a remedy with respect to any other available right or remedy. As a condition precedent to commencing legal action involving a claim or dispute against City arising from this Agreement, Consultant must present a written claim to City in accordance with Livermore Municipal Code Chapter 3.40 Claims Administration.

25. Work Eligibility. Consultant warrants that only personnel authorized to work in the United States pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws shall be provided by Consultant for the performance of the Services.

26. Non-Discrimination. In performance of the Services, Consultant agrees that it will not engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of such person’s race, color, religion, sex/gender, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, marital status, medical condition, military or veteran status, national origin, ancestry, disability, genetic information, age, or any protected classification when providing the Services. Consultant further agrees to comply with all provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in all programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Consultant further assures that it will take necessary actions to ensure compliance with these requirements in the performance of this Agreement.

27. Construction of Language.
(a) The terms and conditions in this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation and each party had a full and fair opportunity to review and revise this Agreement with legal counsel. Any ambiguity in this Agreement will not be resolved against either party as the drafting party. In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between the language in the body of the Agreement and any exhibit hereto, the language in the body of the Agreement controls.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 8 of 24
188

(b) For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms “writing” and “written” includes electronic documents and communication via email, but not when those terms are used in Sections 6, 12, 23, and Sections 27 through 30 for notices, consent, or modifications. For the notices, consent, and modifications in Sections 6, 12, 23, and Sections 27 through 30, the terms “writing” and “written” means either a physically tangible document or an electronic document that satisfies the requirements in Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.64 Electronic Signatures.

28. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties with respect to the Services.

Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. In the event the original of this Agreement is lost or destroyed, an archival copy maintained by City can be used in place of the original for all purposes with the same effect as if it was the original.

29. Notice. Notices under this Agreement must be delivered to the addresses below by deposit in the United States mail or by overnight delivery service, with postage prepaid and delivery confirmation, with a courtesy copy delivered by email to the email addresses below:

TO CITY: Attention: Roberto Escobar
City of Livermore / Community Development
1052 South Livermore Avenue  Livermore, CA, 94550
[email protected]
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
TO CONSULTANT: Attention: Jason Kabalin
Interwest Consulting Group Inc
1516 S. D Street
Elk Grove, CA, 95758
United States
Email: [email protected]

30. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or condition in this Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the nonbreaching party.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 9 of 24
189

31. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines a provision in this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired in any way.

32. Survival. The terms, conditions, and obligations in Sections 2, 8 through 11, 23, 24, 30, and 31 through 33 shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

33. Jurisdiction and Venue. The interpretation, validity, and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any suit, claim, or legal action of any kind related to this Agreement shall be filed and heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Alameda or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

34. Electronic Signatures. By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed this disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 2.64 Electronic Signatures and all other applicable laws. You are not required to sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

35. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.
**************************************************************************************************** Signatures and Exhibit List on the Next Page
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 10 of 24
190

In concurrence and witness whereof, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided therefore, the parties have executed this Agreement, effective on the date set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, which is the date that this Agreement was signed on behalf of City after it was signed by Consultant.

CONSULTANT: Dated:
____________________________ ___________________________ Matthew K Causley
Chief Operating Officer
CITY OF LIVERMORE: Dated:
____________________________ ____________________________ Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________
Deputy/Assistant/Senior Assistant/City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
___________________________
Risk Manager/Analyst
Exhibits:

Exhibit A – Scope of Work
Exhibit B – Fee Schedule
Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 4/14/2026 | 9:05 AM EDT
EXHIBIT A Page 11 of 24
191

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK
Isabel Avenue (SR-84) / I-580 Interchange and SR-84 Corridor Improvements Right of Way Closeout, City Project No. TI199238 State Project No. 04923157L, Federal Project No. RPSTPL-5053(009) Project Management and Right of Way Engineering Services Project Priorities
The local and regional transportation effort to transfer SR-84 from its original alignment along downtown Livermore/First Street to the Isabel Avenue corridor began in the 1960’s. The City of Livermore acquired most of the parcels for the ultimate State right of way for the Isabel Avenue (State Route – 84) corridor and were transferred to the State by 2003; eventually completing construction by 2012. The City of Livermore has identified the following segments of State right of way that require project management and right of way engineering closeout services as a needed order of priority:

1. SR-84 (Isabel Avenue) extension – Jack London Boulevard to Isabel Avenue / I-580 Interchange Right-of-Way Closeout

2. SR-84 (Isabel Avenue) / I-580 Interchange Junction and Portola Avenue / I-580 Overcrossing Right-of-Way Closeout

3. Airway Boulevard (temporarily SR-84)/ I-580 Interchange Right-of-Way Closeout Scope of Services
Interwest Consulting will provide project management, right-of-way engineering and coordination services to assist the City of Livermore in completing the closeout requirements for the above-referenced projects. Our services will include preparation, coordination, and finalization of right-of-way documentation and record mapping necessary to prepare easement documents on City property for relocated wet and dry utilities, prepare transfer documents for transferring 12-City held right of way parcels to the State for acceptance and recordation in order to complete the ultimate State Route 84 right of way footprint for a six lane highway facility.

1. Project Management with Agencies as Indicated
Interwest will coordinate with the following Agencies as necessary for the above-referenced projects:
• City of Livermore: Departments as directed
• Alameda County Public Works
• Pacific Gas & Electric
• Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7 • BART
• COGENT (SPRINT) Communications
• Caltrans, District 4 – Right of Way Team
• Chicago Title Company/Fidelity National Title Group
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 12 of 24
192

2. Right of Way Engineering, Easement and Property Documentation Interwest will coordinate with City staff and relevant stakeholders to prepare and process the following:
• Preparation of Plats and Legal Descriptions for easements required to accommodate the relocation of facilities.
• Preparation of Quitclaim Deeds for prior rights and easements no longer required. • Documentation and mapping of Section 83 areas as identified by the State of California. • Coordination and preparation of new easements for underground facilities associated with the three (3) project corridors.
• Review with Chicago Title Company and involved entities to clear the appropriate parcel encumbrances and to transfer twelve (12) right of way parcels from the City of Livermore to the State for completing the ultimate right of way for State Route 84 (Isabel Avenue) highway corridor and interchange improvements. Interwest will also review Preliminary Title Reports for establishing clear title conveyances of transfers to the State of California by the City of Livermore. • Preparation of transfer documents of individual property areas within the designated alignments to the State of California. SR-84 (Isabel Avenue) Extension, Isabel Avenue (SR-84)/I-580 interchange and Portola Avenue/I-580 Overcrossing.
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-1
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-2
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-3
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-4
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-5
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-6
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-7
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-8
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-9
• State Transfer Parcel 62689-16
• State Transfer Parcel 57924-1
• State Transfer Parcel 57924-2
• Finalization of Record Right-of-Way Maps for submission and acceptance by the State of California, Caltrans Right of Way Division, District 4.

3. Utility and Agency Coordination
Interwest will coordinate with utilities and partner agencies to facilitate preparation and processing of required transfers and easements, including but not limited to:
• City of Livermore; Departments as directed
• Alameda County Public Works
• Pacific Gas & Electric
• Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Zone 7 • BART
• COGENT (SPRINT) Communications
• Caltrans, District 4 – Right of Way Team
• Chicago Title Company/Fidelity National Title Group
• and other applicable agencies
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 13 of 24
193
This coordination will include preparation of transfer documents that require separate review and approvals by the respective utility companies or agencies.

4. Schedule Expectations and Coordination Updates
Based on similar projects and agency coordination requirements, the City can reasonably anticipate the following review timelines:
• Utility Coordination:

Utility involvement and processing is anticipated to require approximately 2 to 4 months. Interwest will provide updates as timing information is received from each utility company. • Caltrans District 4 – Local Agency Right-of-Way Division:

Reviews and approvals are anticipated to require approximately 3 to 6 months. The project team will keep the City informed of any schedule updates or changes. • Zone 7 Water, BART, and Sprint:

Processing durations are currently undetermined. Interwest will promptly communicate any schedule information or changes to City staff upon receipt.

5. Assumptions:

1. Number of Documents are as described in Attachment A scope of services. If through the processing of these documents, additional items are necessary to finalize the project, an evaluation of the proposed fee will be reviewed and discussed with the City Staff prior to proceeding with those items. No out-of-scope items will be started without written authorization from the City Staff.

2. The number of right of way documents including the sheet count (Caltrans right of way record maps, Deeds, Easements, JUA’s, CCUA’s, Encumbrances and Transfer Documents) have been established based upon the existing information provided, if through the progression of the deliverables, or discussions with Public Agencies there is an increase of work effort than that specified in this scope of services, it shall be addressed with the City Staff. No out-of-scope items will be started without written authorization from the City Staff.

3. Any fees charged by a Utility, County Agency, Caltrans, Cogent Communications or BART shall be paid by the City of Livermore.

4. Submittals to Caltrans (transfer documents, plats and legal descriptions, right of way record maps, exhibits for deeds, easements, quitclaims, CCUA’s, JUA’s) are assumed to remain in metric units as provided to date. Caltrans has asked to review the Preliminary Title Reports and each easement which is to be transferred for each Project and will be provided upon acceptance by City of Livermore and Interwest.

Interwest looks forward to supporting the City of Livermore in completing the right-of-way closeout process efficiently and in coordination with all required agencies and stakeholders.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 14 of 24
194

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Isabel Avenue (SR-84) / I-580 Interchange and SR-84 Corridor Improvements Right of Way Closeout, City Project No. TI199238 State Project No. 04923157L, Federal Project No. RPSTPL-5053(009)

LIST OF ITEMS AND DOCUMENTS TO FINALIZE FOR CLOSE-OUT AND COMPLETION WITH CITY & CALTRANS.

1. SR 84 from Jack London Blvd to Isabel Ave/I-580 Interchange Right of Way Closeout, Caltrans Project No. R-10217.

A. Update and Coordinate with PG&E and City to record PUE along Water Treatment Plant Parcel.

B. Update and Coordinate with PG&E and City to record PUE along Airport Parcel.

C. Coordinate and Verify with Cal-Trans the JUA’s and CCUA’s along the entire length of Isabel Avenue from Jack London Blvd to South R-O-W location of SR-580.

1.) * 5-CCUA’s – W, X, S, F and Z (Two “N’s” were shown),

2.) * 15-JUA’s – Y, R, U, P, V, Q, T, N, L, J, H, K, M, O and E D. Check and Coordinate with Caltrans R-O-W Team, on whether a JUA is needed on the North Side of Jack London Blvd., where a 10-foot-wide Easement per Doc. No. 2010- 135552 resides.

E. Coordinate and Finalize Legal Descriptions for Section 83 – Items - 60251-1; 58290-3; 58648-1;
F. Quitclaim of PG&E Easements –81-081067; 2003692873; 80-196983; P.U.E. Per 20063833815; 8711 O.R. 293; Prepare Plats, Legal Descriptions and Closure for review by PG&E for methodology.

G. Update and Coordinate with Caltrans R-O-W Team, Legal Description and Transfer of Parcels No. 58636-1/62689-5 by Grant Deed from the City of Livermore to the State of California.

H. Quitclaim of Road Easement – 8926 O.R. 89; Portion of Old Kitty Hawk at Jack London return at North-East return; 8728 O.R. 437; 8557 O.R. 409; I. Preparation of the two - 10-foot-wide Encroachment Permits crossing Isabel at Rickenbacker Circle (North).

J. PG&E Easement crossing Lot “D” – PM-4847.

K. Quitclaim of PUE per 165 PM 59, East Side of SR-84, Isabel Ave.

L. Prepare Easement for PUE, Slope and Landscape Easement along South Side of Airway Blvd.

M. Prepare Easement for I-E Access and Wall Maintenance Easement along North Side of Airway Blvd., West Side of SR-84, Isabel Ave.

N. Prepare Easement for I-E Access and Wall Maintenance Easement along South Side of AIRWAY BLVD, West Side of ISABEL BLVD.

O. Prepare Easement for Public Utilities and Street Sidewalk Easement along East Side of Isabel Avenue, South of East Airway Blvd.

P. Prepare PG&E - PUE Easements – Five (5) along East Side of Isabel Ave. to the North Side of East Airway Blvd.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 15 of 24
195

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Isabel Avenue (SR-84) / I-580 Interchange and SR-84 Corridor Improvements Right of Way Closeout, City Project No. TI199238 State Project No. 04923157L, Federal Project No. RPSTPL-5053(009)

Q. City to assist Coordination with Staff at Zone 7 for Water Turnout Site Easements. NorthWest Side of SR-84, Isabel Ave. at the interchange.

R. Update and Finalize RECORD RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING with all recorded documents for State of California (Record Map R-10217).
* – there are Two (2) “N’s” The JUA for Electric, confirm if these were made “Z” (to be verified with City and Caltrans)

2. Isabel Ave/I-580 Interchange to Portola Ave/I-580 Overcrossing Right of Way Closeout, Caltrans Project No. R-10216.

A. Coordinate with PG&E for Easements associated with Underground Utilities.

B. Coordinate with Caltrans District - 4 R-O-W Staff, For Documents to be Recorded to the State of California.

C. Coordination with Chicago Title Company for Preliminary Title Reports on Parcels within the Project.

D. Review Preliminary Title Reports prepared by Chicago Title Company to evaluate any additional items unknown as shown in Title Reports.

E. Update and Coordinate with Caltrans R-O-W Team, Legal Description and Transfer of Parcel 62689 by Grant Deed from the City of Livermore to the State of California.

F. Quitclaim for Section 83 locations: 58625-1; 58626-1; 58635-1; 58647-1; G. Update and Coordinate with Caltrans District 4 R-O-W Staff - 3 CCUA's and 3 JUA's within the SR-580 R-O-W
H. Update and Coordinate with City the Quitclaim of a Water Line Easement in Constitution Drive – PER Doc. 99-353867
I. Vacation of a portion of 55’ wide Utility Easement Per – 8719 O.R. 159 (VERIFY WITH CITY)
J. Vacation of a portion of PG&E Easement 8711 O.R. 289 K. Record New PG&E Easement over 19-foot-wide area vacated by Doc No. 2005-299425, City Property and BART Parcel.

L. Quitclaim of a portion of PG&E easement Per Doc. No. 8711 O.R. 293.

M. Quitclaim of a portion of Private Utility Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive.

N. Quitclaim of a portion of Sidewalk Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive.

O. Quitclaim of a portion of Private Landscape Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive.

P. Quitclaim of a portion of 25’ Private Landscape Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive.

Q. Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Storm Drainage Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive.

R. Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Public Utility Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive.

S. Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Sidewalk Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive.

T. Prepare New Easement for Sprint per City of Livermore.

U. Prepare Quitclaim of Easement for Sprint, West of Portola Ave. per City of Livermore.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 16 of 24
196

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Isabel Avenue (SR-84) / I-580 Interchange and SR-84 Corridor Improvements Right of Way Closeout, City Project No. TI199238 State Project No. 04923157L, Federal Project No. RPSTPL-5053(009)

V. Update and Finalize RECORD RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING with all recorded documents for State of California (Record Map R-10216).
* – there are Two (2) “N’s” The JUA for Electric, confirm if these were made “Z” (to be verified with City and Caltrans)

3. Airway Blvd/I-580 Interchange Right of Way Closeout
A. Assist the City of Livermore with Storm Drainage Easement Quitclaim from Alameda County, Update as needed for recording.

B. Assist the City of Livermore with Quitclaim of Private Access Easement, North Side of Parcel at 2850 Constitution Drive, Owned by Brahma Ent, Inc.

C. Resolve Boundary Questions on Record ROW Map, South side of SR-580 at Airway ROW.

D. Update and Coordinate with Caltrans R-O-W Team, Legal Description and Transfer of Parcel 57924 by Grant Deed from the City of Livermore to the State of California.

E. Update and Finalize Wall Maintenance Easement at the South-West Corner of the overcrossing.

F. Update and Finalize Ingress-Egress Easement at the South-West Corner of the overcrossing.

G. Update and Finalize Wall Maintenance Easement at the North-East Corner of the Airway Blvd. and Kitty Hawk Road intersection.

H. Update and Finalize Ingress-Egress Easement at the North-East Corner of the Airway Blvd. and Kitty Hawk Road intersection.

I. Update and Finalize the JUA for the AT&T Easement from the East Side of Airway Blvd./Kitty Hawk Road West through to intersection and Off-Ramp to the City Golf Course Parcel.

J. Update and Finalize the Vacation of Public Utility & Landscape Easement along Southerly side of Constitution Drive
K. Update and Finalize RECORD RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING with all recorded documents for State of California (Record Map R-10628).

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 17 of 24
197

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Isabel Avenue (SR-84) / I-580 Interchange and SR-84 Corridor Improvements Right of Way Closeout, City Project No. TI199238 State Project No. 04923157L, Federal Project No. RPSTPL-5053(009)

Assumptions:

1. Number of Documents are as described in this scope of services. If through the processing of these documents, additional items are necessary to finalize the project, an evaluation of the proposed fee will be reviewed and discussed with the City Staff prior to proceeding with those items. No out of scope items will be started without written authorization from the City Staff.

2. The number of right of way documents including the sheet count (Caltrans right of way record maps, Deeds, Easements, JUA’s, CCUA’s, Encumbrances and Transfer Documents) have been established based upon the existing information provided, if through the progression of the deliverables, or discussions with Public Agencies there is an increase of work effort than that specified in this scope of services, it shall be addressed with the City Staff. No out of scope items will be started without written authorization from the City Staff.

3. Any fees charged by a Utility, County Agency, Caltrans, Sprint or BART shall be paid by the City of Livermore.

4. Submittals to Caltrans (transfer documents, plats and legal descriptions, right of way record maps, exhibits for deeds, easements, quitclaims, CCUA’s, JUA’s) are assumed to remain in metric units as provided to date.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 18 of 24
198
Total Working Days: 454 Working Days 95 Weeks 3/12/2026 Preliminary Engineering Services Between: 3/2/2026 and 12/31/2027 Manager Manager Associate II
$216.00 $216.00 $155.00 $93.00

1.1 Project Management and Administration:
- Budget Management
- Schedule Management
40 48
$ 13,104.00

1.2 Coordination Meetings, including Kick-Off Meeting 40 20 $ 12,960.00

1.3 CalTrans Team Meetings 40 $ 8,640.00

1.4 PG&E Coordination Meetings 20 $ 4,320.00

1.5 Title Company Coordination Meetings 20 $ 4,320.00
Subtotal Hours Task #1 160 20 0 48 228
Subtotal Fee Task #1 $34,560 $4,320 $0 $4,464 $43,344
Task #2 - Field Visits and Measurement of Quantities SR-84 from Jack London Blvd. to Isabel Ave./I-580 Interchange Right of Way Closeout

2.1 Coordination with PG&E for Easements Associated with Undergrounding of Improvements 32 $ 6,912.00

2.2 Coordination with Caltrans District - 4 Staff, for Documents to be Recorded with the State of California 80 80 $ 34,560.00

2.3 Coordination with Chicago Title Company for Preliminary Title Reports on Parcels within the Project. 60 $ 12,960.00

2.4 Review Preliminary Title Reports prepared by Chicago Title Company to evaluate any additional items unknown as found in Title Reports. 80 $ 17,280.00

2.5 Prepare for recording the Transfer Document No. 58636-1/62689-5, Grant Deed to State of California 20 32 $ 9,280.00

2.6 Coordinate with Caltrans Staff the Recording of - 5 CCUA's and 15 JUA's within the SR-84, Isabel Ave. R-O-W 48 80 $ 22,768.00

2.7 PUE's - Water Treatment Plant, Airport Parcels (2), East & West sides of Isabel Ave. directly North of East Airway and South Side of Airway. 16 28 $ 7,796.00

2.8 Prepare Legal Description for transfer per Section 83 Letter from Caltrans for Items: 60251-1; 58290-3; 58648- 1 16 32 $ 8,416.00

2.9 Prepare Quitclaim of Easement from PG&E - 81-081067; 2003692873; 80-196983; P.U.E. Per 20063833815; 8711 O.R. 293; 30 40 $ 12,680.00

2.10 Prepare Plats, Legal Descriptions and Closures for Quitclaim of Road Easements – 8926 O.R. 89; 8728 O.R. 437; 8557 O.R. 409; 80-202518; 24 32 $ 10,144.00

2.11 Update and record PG&E Easement for Underground Utilities Crossing Lot “D” – Parcel Map - No. 4847, Bk. 165 PM Pg. 59 10 16 $ 4,640.00

2.12 Preparation of the two - 10 foot wide Encroachment Permits crossing Isabel at Rickenbacker Circle (North). 16 28 $ 7,796.00

2.13 Prepare Plat, Legal Description and closure for Quitclaim of 10 foot wide PUE Crossing Lot “D” – Parcel Map - No. 4847, Bk. 165 PM Pg. 59, East Side of SR-84, Isabel Blvd. 12 20 $ 5,692.00

2.14 Update and Finalize Plat, Legal Description and closure for Easement for PUE, Slope and Landscape Easement along South Side of Airway Blvd. 10 16 $ 4,640.00

2.15 Prepare Easement for I-E Access and Wall Maintenance Easement along North Side of Airway Blvd. 10 16 $ 4,640.00

2.16 Prepare Easement for I-E Access and Wall Maintenance Easement along South Side of Airway Blvd., West Side of SR-84 - Isabel Ave. 10 16 $ 4,640.00

2.17 Prepare Easement for Public Utilities and Street Sidewalk Easement along East Side of SR-84, Isabel Avenue, South of East Airway Blvd. 10 16 $ 4,640.00

2.18 Prepare PG&E - 5 - PUE's for undergrounded improvements along the East Side & West Side of SR-84, Isabel Ave. along East Airway Blvd. and Branson Way 20 32 $ 9,280.00

2.19 City to assist Coordination with Staff at Zone 7 for Water Turnout Site, North-West Side of SR-84, Isabel Ave. at the interchange. 12 20 $ 5,692.00

2.20 Coordinate with Caltrans Team on whether 10' wide PUE per Doc. No 2010135552 should be a JUA, Prepare Plat, Legal Description and Closure for recording 16 20 $ 6,556.00

2.21 Update and Finalize Record Right of Way Maps with all recorded documents for the State of California - Project No. R-10217 48 80 $ 22,768.00
$ -
Subtotal Hours {Interwest Staff} Task #2 80 580 524 0 1,184 Subtotal Fee Task #2 $17,280 $125,280 $81,220 $0 $223,780 Task #1 - Project Management and Administration, Coordination City of Livermore
TOTAL

FEE SCHEDULE
(SR 84) Isabel Avenue / Interchange and Airway Blvd/I-580 interchange Right of Way Closeout - Project No. TI199238) Supervising
Project Project Engineering
Administrative II

EXHIBIT B
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 19 of 24
199
T H O U G H T F U L S O L U T I O N S . T H R I V I N G C O M M U N I T I E S .

Task #3 - Preparation of Plans and Estimates (SR 84) Isabel Ave/I-580 Interchange to Portola Ave/I-580 Overcrossing Right of Way Closeout

3.1 Coordination with PG&E for Easements Associated with Undergrounding of Improvements 32 $ 6,912.00

3.2 Coordination with Caltrans District - 4 Staff, for Documents to be Recorded with the State of California 32 32 $ 13,824.00

3.3 Coordination with Chicago Title Company for Preliminary Title Reports on Parcels within the Project. 32 $ 6,912.00

3.4 Review Preliminary Title Reports prepared by Chicago Title Company to evaluate any additional items unknown as shown in Title Reports. 60 $ 12,960.00

3.5 Prepare for recording the Transfer Document No. 62689, Grant Deed to State of California 12 20 $ 5,692.00

3.6 Prepare Legal Descriptions and closures for transfer per Section 83 Letter from Caltrans for Items:
58625-1; 58626-1; 58635-1; 58647-1; 24 40 $ 11,384.00

3.7 Coordinate with Caltrans Staff the Recording of - 3 CCUA's and 3 JUA's within the SR-580 R-O-W 28 60 $ 15,348.00

3.8 Quitclaim of Water Line Easement in Constitution Drive – PER Doc. 99-353867 8 16 $ 4,208.00

3.9 Vacation of a portion of 55’ wide Utility Easement Per Doc. No. 8719 O.R. 159 16 32 $ 8,416.00

3.10 Quitclaim of a portion of PG&E easement Per Doc. No. 8711 O.R. 293 16 32 $ 8,416.00

3.11 Quitclaim of a portion of PG&E easement Per Doc. No. 8711 O.R. 289 16 32 $ 8,416.00

3.12 Record New PG&E Easement over 19 foot wide area vacated by Doc No. 2005-299425, on BART Parcel coordinate with BART Team. 24 20 $ 8,284.00

3.13 Record New PG&E Easement over 19 foot wide area vacated by Doc No. 2005-299425, for City Property 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.14 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of Private Utility Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.15 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of Sidewalk Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.16 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of Private Landscape Easement at West Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.17 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of 25’ Private Landscape Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.18 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Storm Drainage Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.19 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Public Utility Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.20 Update Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of a portion of 15’ Sidewalk Easement at East Side Shea Center Drive. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

3.21 Prepare Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of 10 foot wide Sprint Easement per Doc. No. 86-173999. 20 40 $ 10,520.00

3.22 Prepare Plat, Legal Description and Closure for Quitclaim of old Sprint Easement, West of Portola Ave.; Prepare Plat, Legal Description and Closure for New Easement for Sprint per City of Livermore. 28 48 $ 13,488.00

3.23 Update an Finalize Record Right of Way Maps with all recorded documents for the State of California - Project No. R-10216 40 80 $ 21,040.00
$ -
Subtotal Hours Task #3 32 452 580 0 1064
Subtotal Fee Task #3 $6,912 $97,632 $89,900 $0 $194,444 Task #4 - Preparation of Plans and Estimates Airway Blvd./I-580 Interchange Right of Way Closeout

4.1 Coordination with Caltrans District - 4 Staff, for Documents to be Recorded with the State of California 20 20 $ 8,640.00

4.2 Coordination with Chicago Title Company for Preliminary Title Reports on Parcels within the Project. 24 $ 5,184.00

4.3 Review Preliminary Title Reports prepared by Chicago Title Company to evaluate any additional items unknown as shown in Title Reports. 40 $ 8,640.00

4.4 Resolve Boundary Questions on Record ROW Map, South side of SR-580 at Airway ROW. 8 20 $ 4,828.00

4.5 Update and Coordinate with Caltrans R-O-W Team, Legal Description and Transfer of Parcel 57924 by Grant Deed from the City of Livermore to the State of California 20 28 $ 8,660.00

4.6 Update and Finalize Wall Maintenance Easement at the South-West Corner of the overcrossing 10 20 $ 5,260.00

4.7 Update and Finalize Ingress-Egress Easement at the South-West Corner of the overcrossing 10 20 $ 5,260.00

4.8 Update and Finalize Wall Maintenance Easement at the North-East Corner of the Airway Blvd. and Kitty Hawk Road intersection 10 20 $ 5,260.00

4.9 Update and Finalize the JUA for the AT&T Easement from the East Side of Airway Blvd./Kitty Hawk Road West through to intersection and Off-Ramp to the City Golf Course Parcel. 10 20 $ 5,260.00

4.10 Update and Finalize the Vacation of Public Utility & Landscape Easement along Southerly side of Constitution Drive 10 20 $ 5,260.00

4.11 Update and Finalize RECORD RIGHT OF WAY MAPPING with all recorded documents for State of California (Record Map R-10628). 24 60 $ 14,484.00

4.12 As Directed Services $ 53,830.00
Subtotal Hours Task #4 20 186 208 0 414
Subtotal Fee Task #4 $4,320 $40,176 $32,240 $0 $130,566 Total Hours Per Person {Interwest Staff} 292 1,238 1,312 48 2,890 Total Fee $63,072.00 $267,408.00 $203,360.00 $4,464.00 $ 592,134 Total Fee (Rounded) $ 592,000

ATTACHMENT B (CONTINUED)
City of Livermore

FEE SCHEDULE
(SR 84) Isabel Avenue / Interchange and Airway Blvd/I-580 interchange Right of Way Closeout - Project No. TI199238) Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 20 of 24
200
THOUGHTFUL SOLUTIONS. THRIVING COMMUNITIES. 38
City of Livermore | On Call Engineering and Project Management Services for CIP Projects Effective July 2024
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Engineering
Principal in Charge $ 255.00 $ 263.00 $ 271.00 $ 279.00 $ 287.00 Principal Engineer $ 230.00 $ 237.00 $ 244.00 $ 251.00 $ 259.00 City Surveyor $ 220.00 $ 227.00 $ 234.00 $ 241.00 $ 248.00 City Engineer $ 225.00 $ 232.00 $ 239.00 $ 246.00 $ 253.00 Project Manager $ 210.00 $ 216.00 $ 222.00 $ 229.00 $ 236.00 Senior Traffic Engineer $ 200.00 $ 206.00 $ 212.00 $ 218.00 $ 225.00 Traffic Engineer III $ 190.00 $ 196.00 $ 202.00 $ 208.00 $ 214.00 Traffic Engineer II $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 Traffic Engineer I $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 Traffic Engineering Associate II $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 Traffic Engineering Associate I $ 150.00 $ 155.00 $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 Transportation Engineer $ 210.00 $ 216.00 $ 222.00 $ 229.00 $ 236.00 Supervising Engineer $ 205.00 $ 211.00 $ 217.00 $ 224.00 $ 231.00 Senior Engineer $ 200.00 $ 206.00 $ 212.00 $ 218.00 $ 225.00 Licensed Land Surveyor $ 190.00 $ 196.00 $ 202.00 $ 208.00 $ 214.00 Engineering Associate III $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 Engineering Associate II $ 150.00 $ 155.00 $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 Engineering Associate I $ 140.00 $ 144.00 $ 148.00 $ 152.00 $ 157.00 Survey Technician $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Senior Engineering Technician $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Engineering Technician III $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Engineering Technician II $ 115.00 $ 118.00 $ 122.00 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 Engineering Technician I $ 105.00 $ 108.00 $ 111.00 $ 114.00 $ 117.00 Student Trainee $ 50.00 $ 52.00 $ 54.00 $ 56.00 $ 58.00 Grading Plans Examiner $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 Building Safety Services
Certified Building Official $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 Licensed Plan Review Engineer
(structural, civil, electrical,
mechanical) / Architect
$ 160.00
$ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00
Supervising Structural Engineer $ 200.00 $ 206.00 $ 212.00 $ 218.00 $ 225.00 Senior Structural Engineer $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 $ 209.00 Senior Plans Examiner $ 145.00 $ 149.00 $ 153.00 $ 158.00 $ 163.00 CASp $ 135.00 $ 139.00 $ 143.00 $ 147.00 $ 151.00
Inspector III $ 115.00 $ 118.00 $ 122.00 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 Inspector II $ 105.00 $ 108.00 $ 111.00 $ 114.00 $ 117.00 Inspector I $ 95.00 $ 98.00 $ 101.00 $ 104.00 $ 107.00
Permit Technician $ 80.00 $ 82.00 $ 84.00 $ 87.00 $ 90.00 Fire Protection Engineer $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 Senior Fire Plans Examiner $ 135.00 $ 139.00 $ 143.00 $ 147.00 $ 151.00 Hourly Rate Schedule
Beginning on the first anniversary of the Effective Date of the Agreement and annually thereafter, the hourly rates listed below shall be automatically increased based upon the annual increase in the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or successor thereof, Consumer Price Index (United States City Average, All Items (CPI-U), Not Seasonally adjusted, All Urban Consumers, referred to herein as the “CPI”). Such an increase shall not exceed 3% per annum. The increase will become effective upon publication of the applicable CPI data. If the index decreases, the rates listed shall remain unchanged.

Docusign Envelope ID: DDF7AEC6-6E37-41D7-BCA0-B1F455288AAF EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT C 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 21 of 24
201
THOUGHTFUL SOLUTIONS. THRIVING COMMUNITIES. 39
City of Livermore | On Call Engineering and Project Management Services for CIP Projects Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Fire Plans Examiner / Fire Inspector $ 125.00 $ 129.00 $ 133.00 $ 137.00 $ 141.00 ICC Building Plans Examiner $ 125.00 $ 129.00 $ 133.00 $ 137.00 $ 141.00 Senior Code Enforcement Officer $ 140.00 $ 144.00 $ 148.00 $ 152.00 $ 157.00 Code Enforcement Officer $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Trainee $ 75.00 $ 77.00 $ 79.00 $ 81.00 $ 83.00
Construction Management
Construction Manager $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 Assistant Construction Manager $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 Supervising Public Works Observer $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 Senior Public Works Observer $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 Public Works Observer III $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 Public Works Observer II $ 145.00 $ 149.00 $ 153.00 $ 158.00 $ 163.00 Public Works Observer I $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Real Estate
Supervising Corporate Broker $ 260.00 $ 268.00 $ 276.00 $ 284.00 $ 293.00 Senior Project Manager $ 200.00 $ 206.00 $ 212.00 $ 218.00 $ 225.00 Project Manager $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 Senior Acquisition/Relocation Agent $ 140.00 $ 144.00 $ 148.00 $ 152.00 $ 157.00 Acquisition/Relocation Agent $ 125.00 $ 129.00 $ 133.00 $ 137.00 $ 141.00 ROW Technician $ 115.00 $ 118.00 $ 122.00 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 ROW Coordinator $ 100.00 $ 103.00 $ 106.00 $ 109.00 $ 112.00 Administrative Support $ 80.00 $ 82.00 $ 84.00 $ 87.00 $ 90.00 Landscape Design Review Services
Project Manager $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 $ 209.00 Senior Landscape Design Reviewer $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 Landscape Design Reviewer $ 150.00 $ 155.00 $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 Landscape Maintenance Inspector $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Landscape Field Supervisor $ 130.00 $ 134.00 $ 138.00 $ 142.00 $ 146.00 Planning Services
Community Development Director $ 220.00 $ 227.00 $ 234.00 $ 241.00 $ 248.00 Planning Manager $ 190.00 $ 196.00 $ 202.00 $ 208.00 $ 214.00 Project Manager $ 200.00 $ 206.00 $ 212.00 $ 218.00 $ 225.00 Principal Planner $ 180.00 $ 185.00 $ 191.00 $ 197.00 $ 203.00 Senior Planner $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 Associate Planner $ 135.00 $ 139.00 $ 143.00 $ 147.00 $ 151.00 Assistant Planner $ 110.00 $ 113.00 $ 116.00 $ 119.00 $ 123.00 Planning Technician $ 90.00 $ 93.00 $ 96.00 $ 99.00 $ 102.00 Administrative
Grant Manager $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 $ 180.00 $ 185.00 Grant Writer $ 155.00 $ 160.00 $ 165.00 $ 170.00 $ 175.00 Management Analyst II $ 125.00 $ 129.00 $ 133.00 $ 137.00 $ 141.00 Management Analyst I $ 115.00 $ 118.00 $ 122.00 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 Senior Administrative $ 115.00 $ 118.00 $ 122.00 $ 126.00 $ 130.00 Administrative III $ 100.00 $ 103.00 $ 106.00 $ 109.00 $ 112.00 Administrative II $ 90.00 $ 93.00 $ 96.00 $ 99.00 $ 102.00 Administrative I $ 75.00 $ 77.00 $ 79.00 $ 81.00 $ 83.00 Docusign Envelope ID: DDF7AEC6-6E37-41D7-BCA0-B1F455288AAF EXHIBIT B 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 22 of 24
202
Revised 3/10/23 B16.5 – 2M E&O

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Consultant/Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products, and completed operations, as applicable:
$2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability:
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability:

Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1,000,000 Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. A waiver of subrogation is required for Workers’ Compensation insurance. If Consultant/Contractor is a sole proprietor, then they must sign “Contractor Release of Liability.”

4. Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions:
$2,000,000 per claim. Consultant/Contractor warrants that any retroactive date under this policy shall precede the effective date of this contract and, either continuous coverage will be maintained, or an extended discovery period will be exercised for a period of two years beginning at the time work under this contract is completed.

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 23 of 24
203
Revised 3/10/23 B16.5 – 2M E&O

volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant/Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant/Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional insured coverage under the Consultant’s/Contractor’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Consultant’s/Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Consultant/Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: EC391FCF-D353-42A6-B10B-D92B711CA997 EXHIBIT A Page 24 of 24
204
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.9
DATE: May 11, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution authorizing execution of an agreement with Chrisp Company for on-call signing and striping maintenance services in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000 and a term ending December 31, 2031.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement for Services with Chrisp Company for on-call signing and striping maintenance services in an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000 and a term ending December 31, 2031.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
As part of the annual Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping projects, Chrisp Company has been helping the City of Livermore (City) to maintain City streets by removing, replacing, and/or installing traffic signs, striping and pavement markings through on-call Agreements for Services. The total amount allowed in the current on-call agreement with Chrisp Company will be exhausted soon. Staff recommends the execution of a new Agreement for Services with Chrisp Company for an amount not-toexceed $1,000,000 through December 31, 2031.

DISCUSSION
The Livermore Engineering Division published a Request for Proposals (RFP) for on-call signing and striping maintenance services from qualified contractors on November 7, 2025. The City only received one response from Chrisp Company, the City’s current on-call signing and striping contractor.

Over the past ten years, Chrisp Company has been providing on-call signing and striping maintenance services to support the annual Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping projects, as part of the City's Capital Improvements Plan (CIP).
205
Through the annual Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping projects, Chrisp Company has been helping the City maintain road conditions in Livermore by replacing road signs, striping and pavement markings. In addition, as traffic conditions and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) standards change and new traffic laws become effective, existing signing, striping and pavement markings constantly require modifications. Chrisp Company has been helping the City to accommodate the required changes, such as installing red curbs and painted bulb-out curbs in response to Assembly Bill 413, installing high visibility crosswalks and appropriate signages to enhance pedestrian safety, installing bike lane striping, relevant pavement markings and appropriate signages to enhance safety for bicyclists, etc.

City staff have found Chrisp Company’s work to be satisfactory as they perform their work efficiently, provide industry and local expertise, and demonstrate rapid and professional responsiveness.

This agreement will allow Chrisp Company to continue providing on-call services for the annual Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping projects with an amount not-to-exceed $1,000,000 over the next five years through December 31, 2031.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
Funding for services rendered under this agreement will be derived from Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping (project TC212131) and Miscellaneous Traffic Signing and Striping (project TC202615) in the approved 2025-2030 Capital Improvement Plan. No additional appropriations are required.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
10: Work to maintain a safe and efficient local transportation network and address safety concerns

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A - Chrisp Company Agreement
Prepared by: Juan Tenorio
Assistant Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
206
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH

CHRISP COMPANY FOR ON-CALL SIGNING AND STRIPING MAINTENANCE SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,000,000 AND A TERM ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2031
As part of the annual Miscellaneous Traffic Signing & Striping projects, Chrisp Company has been helping the City to maintain City streets by removing, replacing, and/or installing traffic signs, striping and pavement markings through on-call agreements for services. The total amount allowed in the current on-call agreement with Chrisp Company will be exhausted soon. Staff recommends the execution of a new agreement for services with Chrisp Company for an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 through December 31, 2031.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore, that it hereby:

1. Authorizes the City Manager to execute an Agreement for Services with Chrisp Company, attached hereto as Exhibit A, for on-call signing and striping maintenance services, in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for a term ending December 31, 2031.

2. Authorizing the City Manager to take whatever actions are necessary and appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on May 11, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/Tara Mazzanti
Helena Graves Tara Mazzanti
Acting City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – Chrisp Company Agreement
207
25-0836

AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 20 , by and between the City of Livermore (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Chrisp Company (“Contractor”), a(n) California Corporation.

RECITALS
City requires services to provide pavement striping, legends, and markers, along with installation of traffic signs.

Contractor represents and warrants that it possesses the distinct skills, qualifications, experience, and resources necessary to timely perform the services described in this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges City has relied upon these representations and warranties as inducement to award this Agreement to Contractor.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Contractor hereby agree that the aforementioned recitals are true and correct and further agree as follows:

1. Retention as Contractor. City hereby retains Contractor, and Contractor hereby accepts such engagement, to perform the Services described and defined below in Section 3 Description of Services subject to the terms and conditions in this Agreement.

2. Relationship of Parties – Independent Contractors.
(a) The relationship of the parties shall be that of independent contractors.

Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor during the term of this Agreement.
(b) Contractor and its personnel performing the Services on behalf of Contractor are not City officers or employees. Contractor’s personnel shall at all times be under Contractor’s exclusive direction, control, supervision, and management.

Contractor, at its own cost and expense, is responsible for all workers compensation insurance, withholding taxes, unemployment insurance, and any other employer obligations associated with the delivery of the Services by Contractor’s personnel. (c) Contractor and its personnel providing the Services shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident in employment by City, including but not limited to enrollment in the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as an employee of City and any entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 22
208
(d) Contractor shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatsoever against City, and shall have no authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation whatsoever.

3. Description of Services. Contractor shall provide the services described in the recitals and more particularly set forth in Exhibit A Scope of Work, which are collectively defined as “the Services” for the purposes of this Agreement.

4. Contractor’s Responsibilities. Contractor, at its own cost and expense, shall:
(a) Coordinate the Services with Juan Tenorio (“Project Manager”), or such other person designated as the Project Manager by City; (b) At all times faithfully, competently, and diligently perform the Services to the best of its ability, experience, and talent in a courteous manner commensurate with industry, trade, and community standards. Consultant shall follow the highest industry standards when performing the Services required hereunder and covenants that all goods, materials, and equipment will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended. For the purposes of this Agreement the phrase “highest industry standards” means those standards recognized by one or more first-class contractors performing similar Services under similar circumstances within City’s region; (c) Provide the resources and assign competent Contractor personnel necessary to complete the Services in a timely manner;
(d) Immediately remove and replace, without any cost to City, any member of Contractor’s personnel providing the Services to City, in its sole discretion and at any time during this Agreement, directs Contractor to remove and replace, and City agrees to advise Contractor of the reason for the direction for the removal and replacement; (e) Provide all facilities, goods, materials, and equipment that may be necessary for Contractor’s personnel to provide the Services; (f) Obtain and keep in effect during the term of this Agreement all necessary licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance, and approvals legally required and required by trade, craft, or classification for Contractor to provide the Services, including obtaining a business license from the City of Livermore, and keep them all in effect for the term of this Agreement;
(g) Obtain and complete the appropriate City forms for the City to pay Contractor electronically via the Automated Clearing House (ACH). Those forms may be obtained by email at [email protected] or by calling Accounts Payable staff at (925) 960-4345. If Contractor opts-out of electronic payment, it must likewise complete the appropriate City forms that can be obtained from those same sources for payment by check. The authority granted by those forms will remain in force and effect until the City receives written notification of changes, which changes shall not take effect for at least ten business days to afford City a reasonable opportunity to act; Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 22
209
(h) Provide City with a complete Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification Form W-9 using the form most recently issued by the Internal Revenue Service;
(i) Comply with all applicable state and federal laws, as well as Alameda County and City of Livermore ordinances, regulations, and adopted codes, when providing the Services;
(j) Only invoice City for the Services rendered. Contractor’s invoice shall be in writing and describe the Services performed for the payment requested, and if requested by the Project Manager, Contractor shall certify the correctness of any invoice or invoices for Services provided. Contractor shall not submit an invoice to City more frequently than once a calendar month;
(k) Keep and maintain invoices and records related to the Services in an organized manner. At a minimum, the records must be kept for at least three years from the date of City’s final payment to Contractor and must include time sheets, work progress reports, and other documentation to adequately explain all the Services invoiced for payment. Contractor shall make the invoices and records immediately available to City upon delivery of a written request to examine, audit, or copy them at City’s place of business during normal business hours. Contractor shall give City 30 calendar-days’ written notice prior to destroying the invoices and records and allow City an opportunity to take possession. If City wants to take possession, then Contractor and City shall coordinate delivery of the invoices and records to City in the most efficient manner possible;
(l) Be available to the Project Manager, City staff, and other parties referred to Contractor by the Project Manager to answer questions or inquiries related to the Services or invoices;
(m) Prepare and submit a written report to the Project Manager, within three business-days of the Project Manager’s written request, that identifies the Services completed and in progress, the charges incurred to date, and the anticipated cost to complete the remaining Services;
(n) Correct all errors in the Services. If Contractor fails to make such correction in a timely manner, then City may make the correction and then charge the cost thereof to Contractor or deduct that cost from the compensation payable to Contractor; and, (o) Comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, and all amendments thereto, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA, when providing the Services.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 22
210

5. Taxes, Fees and Assessments. Contractor is solely responsible for the payment of any taxes, fees, assessments, and other charges, including penalties and interest, that may be imposed by law and arise from or incurred by Contractor’s performance of the Services. Contractor shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties defined in Section 20 below against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against Contractor. The indemnity in this Section 5 are in addition to and do not in any way limit Contractor’s obligations in Section 20 below

6. Prevailing Wages.
(a) Contractor is aware of the requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the California Labor Code and applicable regulations (collectively “Prevailing Wage Laws”) that require the payment of prevailing wage rates (§§ 1771, 1774, and 1775), employment of apprentices (§§ 1777.5 and 1775.6), certified payroll records (§ 1776), hours of labor (§§ 1813 and 1815), registration and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (§ 1777.1), and the performance of other requirements on public works and maintenance projects as defined the Prevailing Wage Laws. (b) The prevailing wage rates for crafts, classifications, and types of workers are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR, and Contractor is responsible for determining whether the workers are entitled to the payment of prevailing wages and Contractor must pay no less than the specified rates to all entitled workers performing the Services. The schedule of per diem wages is based upon a working day of eight hours.

The rate for holiday and overtime work must be at least time and one-half. (c) Contractor shall ensure that all work for compensation is taken in compliance with the requirements of the Prevailing Wage Laws including but not limited to hours of labor, nondiscrimination, payroll records, apprentices, worker’s compensation and prevailing wages.
(d) If any violation of prevailing wage law associated with this Agreement is deemed to have occurred by any court or administrative authority, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the applicable prevailing rates for any work done to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement. (e) Work on public works and maintenance projects as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the California Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to California Labor Code section 1771.4. No contractor may be awarded a contract for public works and maintenance projects as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws unless currently registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to California Labor Code section 1725.5.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 22
211
(f) Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City harmless from any claim that prevailing wages should have been paid, and Contractor shall be liable for the payment of the same and penalties thereon. It is Contractor’s responsibility to be familiar with the California Labor Code and the Prevailing Wages Laws, and failure or neglect of Contractor to understand the California Labor Code shall and Prevailing Wage Laws in no way relieve Contractor from any obligations thereunder or under this Agreement. (g) Contractor acknowledges that failure to pay prevailing wages to an entitled worker performing the Services may result in the Contractor being ineligible to contract with City.

7. Familiarity with Services. Contractor represents that it: (i) has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed; (ii) has carefully considered how the Services should be performed; and, (iii) fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions associated with performing the Services. If Services involve work on City property, Contractor further represents that it has investigated the property and is fully acquainted with its condition. If Contractor discovers any latent or unknown conditions that materially affect performance of the Services, then Contractor shall immediately notify City of such discovery and shall not proceed with the Services except at Contractor’s risk until Contractor receives written instructions from the Project Manager.

8. Service Warranties.
(a) Contractor warrants that it possesses all capital and other equipment, labor, goods, materials, supplies, and licenses necessary to carry out and complete the Services in compliance with any and all federal, state, county, and city laws, ordinances, and regulations.
(b) Contractor warrants, in addition to all warranties provided or implied by law or public policy, that all Services (including but not limited to all goods, materials, and equipment supplied by the Services) shall be free from defects in design and workmanship. During the term of this Agreement and for one year following its completion, expiration, or termination, Contractor agrees to replace or repair any Services (including but not limited to all goods, materials, and equipment supplied by the Services) that fail due to defects in material or workmanship, which replacement or repair shall be completed by Contractor within 30 days of notice of the failure by City.

9. Safety Provisions. Contractor shall conform to the rules and regulations pertaining to safety established by Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) and the California Division of Industrial Safety.

10. Preservation of City Property. Contractor shall provide, install, and utilize suitable safeguards, approved by City, to protect City property from injury or damage when providing the Services. If City property is injured or damaged as a result of Contractor’s Services, then the Contractor shall, at its own cost and expense, replace or restore that property to a condition as good as when Contractor began providing the Services, which work shall be completed within a reasonable time. In all situations arising out of this Agreement, City and Contractor shall attempt to avoid and minimize the damages resulting from the conduct of the other party.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 5 of 22
212

11. Inspection. Contractor shall furnish City every reasonable opportunity for City to ascertain that the Services by Contractor are being performed in accordance with the requirements and intentions of this Agreement. All work performed and all goods, materials, and equipment provided shall be subject to City inspection and approval. City inspection of such work, goods, materials, and equipment shall not relieve Contractor of any of its obligations to fulfill the requirements in this Agreement.

12. Audit. In addition to the requirements in Section 4(k) above, Contractor shall maintain, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, complete and accurate records of all activities and operations relating to this Agreement. Records, including but not limited to, timecards, employment records, work progress reports, reimbursements, invoices, project records, proprietary data and information, as well as licensed software and any electronic records shall be kept for a period of three years after the date of final payment to Contractor. Contractor agrees that City, or its authorized representative, shall have the right to examine, audit, excerpt, copy, or transcribe any of Contractor’s records pertaining to this Agreement at any time during normal business hours. Contractor shall reimburse City for all reasonable costs of the audit, including travel time and auditor costs, should such audit reveal an overcharge of five (5) percent or more. Any overcharge will be considered a breach of this Agreement and could result in cause for termination.

13. Term. The term of this Agreement commences on 05/11/2026, and terminates upon the completion of the Services or 12/31/2031, whichever occurs first.

14. Termination by City. City may terminate any portion or all of the Services by giving Contractor at least 30 calendar-days’ written notice. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Contractor shall immediately stop all work in progress on the Services except where necessary to preserve the benefit of the work, and Contractor shall then assemble the work on the Services for delivery to City on the termination date. All compensation for Services performed prior to the termination date shall be payable to Contractor in accordance with and subject to Section 15.

15. Compensation and Payment.
(a) The total compensation payable by City to Contractor for the Services SHALL NOT EXCEED the sum of $1,000,000.00 ("not-to-exceed amount"). (b) City shall compensate Contractor for the Services rendered at the hourly rates or task amounts set forth in Exhibit B Fee Schedule, and shall reimburse Contractor for travel expenses and other costs that are identified in Exhibit B, up to the not-to-exceed amount.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 6 of 22
213
(c) Contractor and City acknowledge that compensation paid by City to Contractor pursuant to this Agreement is based upon Contractor’s estimated costs to provide the Services, including the salaries and benefits paid by Consultant to its personnel. Consequently, Contractor and City further agree that compensation paid by City to Contractor is intended to include the costs of contributions to any pensions or annuities, or both, to which Contractor and its personnel may be eligible, and that City has no responsibility for contributions beyond the compensation paid to Contractor under this Agreement. As provided in this Agreement, the hourly rates, task amounts and reimbursement for specified travel expenses and costs in the Fee Schedule are intended to be Contractor’s only compensation for the Services and is inclusive of all costs of labor, licensing, permitting, overhead and administrative costs, and any-and-all other costs, expenses, and charges incurred by Contractor, its agents, and employees to provide the Services, including all taxes Contractor is required to pay. (d) City shall pay Contractor no later than 30 days after City receives a written invoice from Contractor and verifies the Services were performed for the payment requested.
(e) City shall pay Contractor via the Automated Clearing House or as otherwise instructed by Contractor pursuant to Section 4(g) above.

16. Ownership.
(a) Contractor shall bear the risk of loss or damage to any goods, materials, or equipment associated with the Services until delivered to and accepted by City. (b) All drawings, designs, data, photographs, reports and other items prepared or obtained by Contractor in the performance of the Services are City’s property and Contractor shall deliver them to City upon demand.
(c) All goods, materials, and equipment purchased for or produced as a result of the Services, including all warranties therefore, are City’s property and Contractor shall deliver them to City upon demand.

17. Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Right of Use. All items created by Contractor for City under this Agreement are works made for hire, and Contractor shall give City the copyright and all intellectual property rights to all items developed, prepared, and delivered as part of the Services. Contractor agrees that all aspects of the Services and items created thereby will be original works of creation and will not use, in whole or in part, any work created by any other party, except when expressly disclosed by Contractor to City and Contractor obtains a license to such items for the benefit of City.

All licenses must be perpetual, world-wide, non-exclusive, and royalty free sufficient in scope to permit City’s full use and enjoyment of its ownership rights in the items created by the Services.

18. Confidentiality. Contractor shall not disclose any confidential or proprietary information received from City to anyone except Contractor’s personnel who require access to the information to perform the Services. This obligation shall survive termination and remain in full force and effect until the information, and any copies thereof, are returned to City or confirmed destroyed in a manner satisfactory to City.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 7 of 22
214

19. Defense, Indemnity, and Hold Harmless. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend with counsel selected by or otherwise acceptable to City, City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, and designated volunteers (collectively “Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, expenses, and costs (including without limitation, attorney’s fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively “Liability”) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s performance of the Services, or in connection with Contractor’s failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for such Liability caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Contractor’s obligations to hold harmless, indemnify, and defend shall not be excused because of Contractor’s inability to evaluate Liability or because Contractor evaluates Liability and determines that Contractor is not liable to the claimant. These obligations are independent of, and shall not in any way be limited by, the minimum insurance obligations contained in this Agreement. These obligations shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement. Contractor must respond within 30 days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by City.
(a) Modification for Construction Contracts. To the extent this Agreement is a “construction contract” covered by California Civil Code section 2782, then Contractor’s duty to indemnify shall not apply in a manner prohibited by California Civil Code section 2782.
(b) Modification for Design Professional Services. To the extent this Agreement is for “design professional services” defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8, then Contractor’s duties to defend and indemnify shall only apply to the extent provided for in California Civil Code section 2782.8(a), unless section 2782.8(a) is not applicable for one of the reasons set forth in 2782.8(e).

20. Insurance. Without limiting Contractor’s indemnification of the Indemnified Parties, Contractor shall procure and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement policies of insurance in the amounts and under the terms set forth in Exhibit C Insurance Requirements against claims and Liability that may arise from or in connection with this Agreement and performance of the Services. Upon reasonable written notice, Contractor shall comply with any changes in the amounts and terms of insurance as may be required from time-to-time by City’s Risk Manager.

21. Force Majeure; Service Delays. Should Contractor’s performance of the Services be obstructed or delayed due to changes in the Services by City, by any default, act, or omission of City, or by strikes, fire, earthquake, or any other Act of God, or by the inability to obtain goods, materials, equipment, or labor due to federal government restrictions arising out of defense or war programs, then Contractor’s time for performance may, at City’s sole discretion, be extended for such periods as may be agreed upon by City and Contractor. Nothing in this section restricts City’s authority in Section 14 to terminate this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 8 of 22
215

22. Acceptance of Final Payment. Contractor’s acceptance of final payment will release City from any and all claims and liabilities for compensation under this Agreement.

23. Acceptance of Work. City’s acceptance of, or payment to Contractor for, the Services does not release Contractor from its responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or competency of the Services, nor do the actions constitute an assumption of Contractor’s responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the Services.

24. Conflict of Interest. Contractor represents that no City employee or official has a financial interest in Contractor. Contractor shall not offer, encourage, or accept any financial interest in any part of Contractor's business by or from a City employee or official during the term of this Agreement or as a result of being awarded this Agreement. If any of the Services are paid by reimbursement from an agreement between City and a private party, Contractor represents that it has not performed any work for that private party during the twelve-month period prior to the execution of this Agreement, and that it shall not negotiate, offer or accept any contract for services from that party during the term of this Agreement.

25. Economic Disclosure. Contractor shall comply with City’s local conflict of interest code implementing the California Political Reform Act and shall prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if the Services involve making, or participation in making, governmental decisions or financial decisions by City that may have a material effect on Contractor’s financial interests. While it is Contractor’s sole responsibility to evaluate its conflicts of interest, Contractor nevertheless agrees to prepare and file an economic disclosure statement if requested by City.

26. Levine Act Compliance. California Government Code section 84308 (Levine Act) prohibits City officers from participating in any action related to a contract, license, permit, or entitlement if the officer receives political contributions from a party, or participant, or agent thereof, that totals more than $500 within the twelve months preceding the decision or within the twelve months following the date of the final decision.

Contractor shall review and complete as necessary the City’s California Levine Act Disclosure Statement that can be obtained from the City Clerk.

27. Use of Recycled Products. If fitness and quality are equal, then Consultant shall utilize recycled products consistent with the City’s Environmentally Preferrable Purchasing and Practices Policy, and as defined in California Public Contract Code Section 12200 for the Services, instead of nonrecycled products whenever recycled products are available at the same or a lesser cost than nonrecycled items. Information on recycled materials can be found here:
• Sustainable Purchasing | StopWaste - Home, Work, School • Reducing Waste at Work | StopWaste - Home, Work, School • Recommendations of Specifications, Standards, and Ecolabels for Federal Purchasing | US EPA
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 9 of 22
216

28. Non-Exclusive Agreement. This Agreement is non-exclusive. City reserves the right to provide, and to retain other qualified contractors to provide, services that are the same or similar to the Services.

29. Business Entity Status. Contractor is responsible for filling all required documents and forms with the California Secretary of State and meeting all requirements of the Franchise Tax Board, as well as the California Business and Professions Code and any other state statute, to the extent such requirements apply to Contractor to provide the Services. By entering into this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is: authorized to do business in California; in good standing with the California Secretary of State; and, in good standing with all agencies having jurisdiction over Contractor, including any licensing agencies and trade industries. If Contractor is a suspended entity at the time it enters into this Agreement, City may take steps to void this Agreement.

30. Authority to Execute Agreement. Contractor has taken all necessary action to authorize the execution of this Agreement, and expressly represents that the person signing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor has received and accepted the authority to sign and execute this Agreement on behalf of Contractor. Upon the Effective Date, this Agreement shall constitute a legal, valid and binding obligation of Contractor, enforceable against Contractor in accordance with its terms, which authorization is ratified and confirmed upon Contractor’s acceptance of the first compensation payment by City

31. No Subcontracting and No Assignment. Contractor’s unique personal competence, experience, specialized personal knowledge, trade skills, and reputation were a substantial inducement to City for the award of this Agreement to Contractor, therefore no part of the Services may be assigned or subcontracted without City’s prior written consent. For the purposes of this section, a change of fifty percent or more in the ownership or control of Contractor constitutes an assignment.

32. Remedies. All remedies permitted or available under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, are cumulative and alternative, and the invocation of a right or remedy will not be construed to waive or elect a remedy with respect to any other available right or remedy. As a condition precedent to commencing legal action involving a claim or dispute against City arising from this Agreement, Contractor must present a written claim to City in accordance with Livermore Municipal Code Chapter 3.40 Claims Administration.

33. Work Eligibility. Contractor warrants that only personnel authorized to work in the United States pursuant to the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and other applicable laws shall be provided by Contractor for the performance of the Services.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 10 of 22
217

34. Non-Discrimination. In performance of the Services, Contractor agrees that it will not engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of such person’s race, color, religion, sex/gender, gender identity/expression, sexual orientation, marital status, medical condition, military or veteran status, national origin, ancestry, disability, genetic information, age, or any protected classification when providing the Services. Consultant further agrees to comply with all provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in all programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. Consultant further assures that it will take necessary actions to ensure compliance with these requirements in the performance of this Agreement.

35. Construction of Language.
(a) The terms and conditions in this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation and each party had a full and fair opportunity to review and revise this Agreement with legal counsel. Any ambiguity in this Agreement will not be resolved against either party as the drafting party. In the event of an inconsistency or conflict between the language in the body of the Agreement and any exhibit hereto, the language in the body of the Agreement controls.
(b) For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms “writing” and “written” includes electronic documents and communication via email, but not when those terms are used in Sections 14, 20, 31, and 35 through 38 for notices, consent, or modifications.

For the notices, consent, and modifications in Sections 14, 20, 31, and 35 through 38 the terms “writing” and “written” means either a physically tangible document or an electronic document that satisfies the requirements in Livermore Municipal Code Section 2.64 Electronic Signatures

36. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement supersedes all other agreements, whether oral or written, between the parties with respect to the Services.

Any modification to this Agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties. In the event the original of this Agreement is lost or destroyed, an archival copy maintained by City can be used in place of the original for all purposes with the same effect as if it was the original.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 11 of 22
218

37. Notice. Notices under this Agreement must be delivered to the addresses below by deposit in the United States mail or by overnight delivery service, with postage prepaid and delivery confirmation, with a courtesy copy delivered by email to the email addresses below:

TO CITY: Attention: Juan Tenorio
City of Livermore / Community Development
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA, 94550
[email protected]
Email: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
TO CONTRACTOR: Attention: Mark Chrisp
Chrisp Company
43650 Osgood Road
Fremont, CA, 94539
United States
Email:[email protected]

38. Waiver. Failure to insist upon the strict performance of any term or condition in this Agreement, no matter how long the failure continues, is not a waiver of the term or condition and does not bar the right to subsequently demand strict performance. To be effective, a waiver must be in writing and signed by the nonbreaching party.

39. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction determines a provision in this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired in any way.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 12 of 22
219

40. Survival. The terms, conditions, and obligations in Sections 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 16 through 19, 31, 32, 35, and 38 through 41 shall survive the completion or termination of this Agreement.

41. Jurisdiction and Venue. The interpretation, validity, and enforcement of this Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any suit, claim, or legal action of any kind related to this Agreement shall be filed and heard in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Alameda or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

42. Electronic Signatures. By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed this disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents pursuant to Livermore Municipal Code section 2.64 Electronic Signatures and all other applicable laws. You are not required to sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

43. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement, and all of which, when taken together, will be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. The facsimile, email, or other electronically delivered signatures of the Parties shall be deemed to constitute original signatures, and facsimile or electronic copies hereof shall be deemed to constitute duplicate originals and shall be valid and effective for all purposes.
**************************************************************************************************** Signatures and Exhibit List on the Next Page
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 13 of 22
220
In concurrence and witness whereof, and in recognition of the mutual consideration provided therefore, the parties have executed this Agreement, effective on the date set forth in the first paragraph of this Agreement, which is the date that this Agreement was signed on behalf of the City after it was signed by Contractor.

CONTRACTOR: Dated:
____________________________ ___________________________ Mark Chrisp
Vice President
CITY OF LIVERMORE: Dated:
____________________________ ____________________________ Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________
Deputy/Assistant/Senior Assistant/City Attorney
APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:
___________________________
Risk Manager/Analyst
Exhibits:

Exhibit A – Scope of Work
Exhibit B – Fee Schedule
Exhibit C – Insurance Requirements
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 4/14/2026 | 11:58 AM PDT
EXHIBIT A Page 14 of 22
221

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
Scope of Work Description
The City of Livermore, Transportation Engineering Division manages a variety of transportation projects. From time to time, the city retains private services to remove and/or install traffic signage and pavement markings. These services typically include, but are not limited to, the following tasks:

Contractor/Vendor Responsibilities

1. Furnishing and installing traffic striping, legends, pavement markers and traffic signage. Pavement striping and markings shall conform with the latest Section 84 of the Caltrans State Specifications. Retroreflective pavement markers shall conform to the provisions of Section 81-3.02C, “Retroreflective Pavement Markers” of the State Specifications. Pavement markers shall be placed using hot melt bitumen adhesive and shall conform to Section 81-3.02D “Hot Melt Bituminous adhesives” of the State Specifications. Two-way reflective blue fire hydrant markers shall be placed in conformance with City of Livermore Standard Construction Detai1 W-1 B.

2. Removal of traffic striping, legends, and markings. Legends, striping and markers are to be removed in conformance with Section 81-8.03B, “Remove Pavement Markers” of the State Specifications and shall be removed by grinding or other city approved method. All removed traffic stripes and pavement markings and excess material shall become the property of the CONTRACTOR and shall be disposed of in a legal and proper manner. Removal and disposal of existing traffic markings and excess material shall conform to Section 15, “Existing Facilities” of the Caltrans Standard Specifications and as specified herein.

3. The CONTRACTOR shall conduct his/her work so as not to damage existing pavement and public improvements to remain. Any resultant damage determined to be excessive by the city shall be repaired by the CONTRACTOR at his/her sole expense.

4. Damage to the pavement resulting from removal of pavement markers shall be considered as a depression more than 1/4 inch deep and shall be repaired by the CONTRACTOR by filling the depression with hot melt bituminous adhesive to the satisfaction of the City.

5. Where blast cleaning is used for the removal of traffic stripes and pavement markings, the residue shall be removed immediately alter contact between the blast media and the surface being treated. Such removal shall be by a vacuum attachment operating concurrently with the blast cleaning operation.

6. Where removal of traffic stripes and markings is done by grinding or media blasting methods, the affected pavement surface shall be completely covered by applying asphaltic emulsion conforming to Section 94 of the Caltrans Standard Specifications.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 15 of 22
222

7. If stop bars, crosswalks, centerline, and lane lines are not re-established the same day as they are removed, the CONTRACTOR shall use temporary reflective markers for temporary delineation.

8. Traffic signs furnished and installed per Caltrans Standards and City Standard Construction Detail ST-17. See bid detail for specific signs.

9. Contractor shall furnish and install Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) set up per Caltrans Standard Plan ES-7B (Type 1-B Pole – 14’ high) and City Standard Specifications Section 344100 - Traffic signals and Lighting systems.

10.All work conducted by the CONTRACTOR shall be executed per the City of Livermore Standard Construction Details and Standard Specifications including Division 32, Exterior Improvements, Section 321723 - Traffic Stripes and Pavement Markings.

City Project Manager Responsibilities
Manager will submit a Task Order for every on-call work to be performed by contractor indicating the scope of each individual task and schedule.

Deliverables
Deliverables will be determined based on each on-call Task Order.

Schedule & Timeline
Projects will be scheduled based on size of individual Task Order.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 16 of 22
223

EXHIBIT B

FEE SCHEDULE
The Contractor shall be compensated for the services identified in Exhibits A to this Agreement as follows:

1. Maximum Not to Exceed amount.

A. The maximum the Contractor shall be paid on this Agreement is 1,000,000.00 hereafter the Not to Exceed amount. The Not to Exceed amount includes all payments to be made pursuant to this Agreement, including City approved reimbursable expenses, if any. Nothing in this Agreement requires the City to pay for work not identified in Exhibit A.

Standard Reimbursable Items: Only the reimbursable items identified shall be compensated to the Contractor. Reimbursable expenses will be reimbursed without markup. Reimbursable expenses shall not exceed the amount set forth in section 1.A of this Exhibit.

C. The Contractor shall be entitled to receive payments for its work performed pursuant to the Agreement. The City will pay Contractor based on invoices for acceptable work performed and approved until the Not to Exceed amount is reached. Thereafter, Contractor must complete services based on the Agreement without additional compensation unless there is a material change to the Statement of Work and Scope by a written Amendment.

D. If work is completed before the Not to Exceed amount is reached, the Contractor’s compensation will be based on the Contractor’s invoices previously submitted for acceptable work performed and approved.

2. Pricing
Replace with full cost of contract. If multi-year, break down by year (see example below) Annual Project FY 2026-27 $200,000
Annual Project FY 2027-28 $200,000
Annual Project FY 2028-29 $200,000
Annual Project FY 2029-30 $200,000
Annual Project FY 2030-31 $200,000
Total Contract Amount $1,000,000
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 17 of 22
224

3. Unit Prices (Bid Detail)
The Not-to-Exceed amount of this contract shall be 1,000,000.00 to be billed by the contractor on an as-needed basis, based on the unit prices in the following table:

BID DETAIL
Item
No. Item Description Estimated
Quantity Unit Unit Price($)
1 Detail 4 > 100 LF $1.25
2 Detail 9 > 100 LF $2.00
3 Detail 10 1 to 99 LF $3.20
4 Detail 10 > 100 LF $3.25
5 Detail 21 > 100 LF $5.25
6 Detail 22 1 to 99 LF $6.00
7 Detail 22 > 100 LF $6.00
8 Detail 23 1 to 99 LF $6.00
9 Detail 23 > 100 LF $6.00
10 Detail 25 >100 LF $3.25
11 Detail 25A >100 LF $4.00
12 Detail 26 >100 LF $1.75
13 Detail 27B > 100 LF $3.25
14 Detail 27C > 100 LF $2.50
15 Detail 29 1 to 99 LF $12.00
16 Detail 29 > 100 LF $12.00
17 Detail 30 > 100 LF $12.00
18 Detail 32 > 100 LF $8.75
19 Detail 33 >100 LF $8.75
20 Detail 37B >100 LF $4.25
21 Detail 37C > 100 LF $4.25
22 Detail 38 1 to 99 LF $4.75
23 Detail 38B 1 to 99 LF $5.00
24 Detail 39 1 to 99 LF $3.25
25 Detail 39 > 100 LF $3.25
26 Detail 39A >100 LF $3.25
27 Detail 40 >100 LF $3.25
28 Detail 40A >100 LF $3.25
29 Detail 41 >100 LF $3.25
30 12" White or Yellow Crosswalk or Limit Line 1 to 99 LF $14.00 31 12" White or Yellow Crosswalk or Limit Line >100 LF $11.00 32 12" White or Yellow Crosswalk Hatching >100 LF $11.00 Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 18 of 22
225
33 8" White or Yellow Thermoplastic 1 to 99 LF $9.50
34 8" White or Yellow Thermoplastic >100 LF $7.50
35 4-inch white lines for parking stalls (Paint) >100 LF $3.75 36 Removing and sealing existing pavement
marking >100 SF
$10.00
37 Removal of Markers >100 LF $3.25
38 Type I 10' Arrow Each $155.00
39 Type I 18' Arrow Each $275.00
40 Type I 24' Arrow Each $345.00
41 Type II (L) Arrow Each $495.00
42 Type II (B) Arrow Each $650.00
43 Type III (L) Arrow Each $465.00
44 Type III (B) Arrow Each $800.00
45 Type IV Arrow Each $165.00
46 Type V Arrow Each $365.00
47 Type VI Arrow Each $465.00
48 Type VII Arrow Each $300.00
49 Type VIII Arrow Each $400.00
50 Railroad Crossing Symbol Each $770.00
51 Disabled Persons Parking Symbol Each $475.00
52 Two-Way Blue Reflective Fire Hydrant Marker Each $35.00 53 Bike Lane with Arrow Pavement Marking (per
City Standard 27A) SF
$12.00
54 Install Pavement Marking Words (STOP,
SCHOOL etc.) SF
$12.00
55 Install Pavement Marking Numbers (35, 35 etc.) SF $12.00 56 Stop Sign - Standard Size Each $600.00
57 Pedestrian Crossing Sign - Size 30x30 (W54) Each $600.00 58 School Children Crossing Sign - Standard Size
(W63) Each
$675.00
59 Handicap Parking Only Sign - (R99) Each $550.00
60 Complete Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
(RRFB) Each
$8,500.00
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 19 of 22
226
Note:

Item: 60 Partial Item: Installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon only includes footing and installation only. Excludes RRFB system and pole (RRFB system & pole to be priced at time of request).

Added Mobilization on Work Order(s) totaling less than $5,000 = 1 LS $3,500.

4. Terms of Payments. Consultant to submit invoices once work has been completed and verified in the field.

5. Invoices. Each invoice submitted shall identify the specific task(s) listed in Exhibit A and this Exhibit. Invoices shall be submitted to the address below:

City of Livermore
Community Development /Engineering
Attention: Juan Tenorio
1052 South Livermore Avenue
Livermore, CA 94550
[email protected]
[email protected]
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 20 of 22
227

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance
Consultant/Contractor shall maintain limits no less than:

1. Commercial General Liability, including operations, products, and completed operations, as applicable:
$5,000,000 per occurrence/$10,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form of insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability:
$2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation and Employer's Liability:

Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1,000,000 Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease. A waiver of subrogation is required for Workers’ Compensation insurance. If Consultant/Contractor is a sole proprietor, then they must sign “Contractor Release of Liability.”
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retention
All self-insured retentions (SIR) must be disclosed to Risk Management for approval and shall not reduce the limits of liability. Policies containing any self-insured retention (SIR) provision shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the SIR may be satisfied by either the named insured or the City of Livermore. The City of Livermore reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any insurance policy and endorsements. Failure to exercise this right shall not constitute a waiver of right to exercise later.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:

VII and accepted to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City of Livermore.

Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, and designated volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant/Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant/Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

EXHIBIT C
Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 21 of 22
228

2. The limits of insurance required in this agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. The additional insured coverage under the Consultant’s/Contractor’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 04 13. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of the City of Livermore before the City’s own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policy, including breaches of warranties, shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Livermore, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers.

4. The Consultant’s/Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

5. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled by either party before expiration of the policy unless notice is delivered in accordance with policy provisions.

6. It shall be a requirement under this agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than, or in excess of, the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits shall be available to the additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this agreement; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named Insured; whichever is greater.

7. Certificate Holder section of the insurance certificate should read: City of Livermore, 1052 S. Livermore Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550 Verification of Coverage
Consultant/Contractor shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsement(s) effecting coverage to the City of Livermore for approval. The endorsements shall be on forms acceptable to the City of Livermore. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City of Livermore before work commences. The City of Livermore reserves the right to require complete and certified copies of all insurance policies required by this Agreement.

Docusign Envelope ID: E33328E2-1D3D-4AC0-847E-24F604844E23 EXHIBIT A Page 22 of 22
229
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.10
DATE: May 11, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution approving a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of $372,723 from FY 2026-27 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding to the East Avenue Corridor ATP Implementation Project TB202222.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the allocation of $372,723 from FY 2026-27 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding to the East Avenue Corridor ATP Implementation Project TB202222.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
The City of Livermore (City) is a recipient of the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funding from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The TDA Article 3 funding is available for the exclusive use of pedestrian and bicycle projects and requires the local City Council approve the request for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding. The East Avenue Corridor Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Implementation Project TB202222 (Project) is a good candidate for this funding.

The Project will upgrade the pedestrian bulb outs and medians installed as part of the 2023 Tactical East Avenue Project and install similar pedestrian improvements at three intersections in the vicinity of the Robert Livermore Community Center. The Project will also designate a bicycle boulevard on roadways through the residential neighborhoods north of East Avenue between School Street and Vasco Road.

The proposed bicycle boulevard is identified in the Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan (BB24, BB26, and BB37).

Staff recommends the City Council approve the request to the MTC for the allocation of $372,723 from FY 2026-27 TDA Article 3 funding to the Project. The Project location is shown in Attachment 1. 230

DISCUSSION
The TDA, Public Utilities Code Sections 99233.3 and 99234, makes funds available in the nine-county MTC region for the exclusive use of pedestrian and bicycle projects. Eligible projects will need to be completed in the allocated time (fiscal year of allocation plus two additional fiscal years), have an appropriate CEQA document, and a signed City Council Resolution. The City has $372,723 of TDA Article 3 funds available to claim for fiscal years 2025-26 and 2026-27. Staff recommends the City Council approve the request to the MTC for the allocation of all available TDA Article 3 funds to the Project.

The Project includes two components:

1. Updating the painted pedestrian bulb outs and ADA ramps at the six intersections improved with the 2023 Tactical East Avenue project and installing similar treatments to three intersections near the Robert Livermore Community Center

2. Completing a bicycle boulevard between School Street and Vasco Road through the neighborhoods north of East Avenue
East Avenue
In 2023, pedestrian improvements consisting of painted curb extensions and medians, high visibility crosswalks, and traffic bollards were installed along East Avenue at intersections with Maple Street, 7th Street, Dolores Street, Jensen Street, Estates Street, and Hillcrest Avenue through the Tactical East Avenue demonstration project. The goal to slow traffic through these intersections and make pedestrian crossings safer and more comfortable has been met. This project will improve on the original design by:
allowing more turning space for trucks, trailers, buses, and fire trucks without compromising speed reductions for passenger cars
improving aesthetics and reducing maintenance costs with more durable materials providing a clearer separation between the pedestrian and traffic areas at the bulb outs updating curb ramps to meet current ADA standards
Similar pedestrian improvements are proposed on East Avenue at Madison Avenue, Almond Avenue, and Loyola Way. A painted crosswalk with a rectangular rapid flashing beacon is proposed at Almond Avenue.

Bicycle Boulevard
Bike boulevards provide continuous, comfortable bike routes through the local street network on streets with slow vehicle speeds and low vehicle volumes. The proposed project will designate a bicycle boulevard on roadways through the residential neighborhoods north of East Avenue between School Street and Vasco Road. The proposed bike boulevard routes are included in the 2018 Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan (BB24, BB26, and BB37). Proposed improvements include:
painted pedestrian bulb-outs at key intersections
restriped ladder style crosswalks
bicycle boulevard signing and marking
bicyclist wayfinding signs
striping and signal modification at North Mines Road and Charlotte Way and North Mines Road 231
and Audry Street to provide two-stage bicycle left turn from North Mines Road bike lanes The Project is currently at the 65% design phase and construction is tentatively scheduled to begin in winter 2026-27. The project scope and schedule meet the requirements of the TDA Article 3 funds.

This project meets the requirements for a categorical exemption under CEQA. A notice of exemption has been filed with Alameda County.

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
The Project is funded in the 2025-30 Capital Improvement Plan with a total of $3,350,000 in Fiscal Years 2025-26 and 2026-27. Funding is from Measure BB-Bike/Pedestrian (Fund 551), Measure BB-Local Street & Road (Fund 552), and Gas Tax (Fund 560). This TDA grant of $372,723 in FY 2026-27 funding will augment the existing budget. Combined, the budget will cover all design and construction costs.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
10: Work to maintain a safe and efficient local transportation network and address safety concerns

ATTACHMENTS

1. Location Map

2. Resolution

3. Exhibit A - TDA Article 3 Project Application Findings

4. Exhibit B - TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Prepared by: Bob Vinn
Special Projects Manager
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
232
Project Map

EAST AVE
East Avenue ATP Implementation Project TB202222
ATTACHMENT 1
233
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION APPROVING A REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN

TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR THE ALLOCATION OF
$372,723 FROM FY 2026-27 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PROJECT FUNDING TO THE

EAST AVENUE CORRIDOR ATP IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT
TB202222
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised, entitled “Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects,” which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of “TDA Article 3” funding; and WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108, Revised requires that requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and WHEREAS, the City of Livermore desires to submit a request to MTC for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Exhibit B to this resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or bicyclists.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that the City of Livermore declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code, and furthermore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project or projects described in Exhibit B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability of the City of Livermore to carry out the project; and furthermore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that the City of Livermore attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in Exhibit A to this resolution; and furthermore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore that a certified copy of this resolution and its exhibits, and any accompanying supporting materials 234
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency, countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as the case may be, of Alameda County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on May 11, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Tara Mazzanti
Helena Graves Tara Mazzanti
Acting City Clerk Senior Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – TDA Article 3 Project Application Findings
Exhibit B – TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
235
MTC, November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 1 Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year FY2026-2027 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding Findings

1. That the City of Livermore is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds, nor is the City of Livermore legally impeded from undertaking the project(s) described in “Attachment B” of this resolution.

2. That the City of Livermore has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project(s) described in Attachment B.

3. A review of the project(s) described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project(s).

4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.

5. That the project(s) described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).

6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description(s) of the project(s) in Attachment B, the sources of funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project(s).

7. That the project(s) described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or final design and engineering or quick build project; and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic and/or Class IV separated bikeway; and/or for the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been received by the City of Livermore within the prior five fiscal years.

8. That the project(s) described in Attachment B which are bicycle projects have been included in a detailed bicycle circulation element included in an adopted general plan, or included in an adopted comprehensive bikeway plan (such as outlined in Section 2377 of the California Bikeways Act, Streets and Highways Code section 2370 et seq.) or responds to an immediate community need, such as a quick-build project.

9. That any project described in Attachment B bicycle project meets the mandatory minimum safety design criteria published in the California Highway Design Manual or is in a National Association of City and Transportation Officials (NACTO) guidance or similar best practices document.

10. That the project(s) described in Attachment B will be completed in the allocated time (fiscal year of allocation plus two additional fiscal years).

11. That the City of Livermore agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project(s) and facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.

EXHIBIT A
236
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 5
Resolution No. _____ page ___ of ___
Attachment B
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form

1. Agency City of Livermore

2. Primary Contact Bob Vinn

3. Mailing Address 1052 S. Livermore Ave, Livermore CA 94550

4. Email Address [email protected] 5. Phone Number 925.580.8287

6. Secondary Contact (in
the event primary is
not available)
Joanna Liu

7. Mailing address (if
different) N/A☐

8. Email Address [email protected] 9. Phone Number 925.960.4556

10. Send allocation
instructions to (if
different from above):

11. Project Title East Avenue ATP Implementation

12. Amount requested $372,723 13. Fiscal Year of
Claim
FY 2026-27

14. Description of Overall Project:

15. Project Scope Proposed for Funding: (Project level environmental, preliminary planning, and ROW are ineligible uses of TDA funds.)

16. Project Location: A map of the project location is attached or a link to a online map of the project location is provided below:

Project Relation to Regional Policies (for information only)

17. Is the project in an Equity Priority Community? Yes☐ No☒

18. Is this project in a Priority Development Area or a Transit-Oriented Community? Yes☐ No☒ This project will enhance the pedestrian improvements made under the Tactical East Avenue demonstration, expand similar improvements to three intersections on East Avenue near the Robert Livermore Community Center, and implement a bicycle boulevard between School Street and Vasco Road through the residential neighborhoods north of east Avenue.

Construction
See Attachment 1

EXHIBIT B
237
November 2022 TDA Article 3 Model Resolution Page 6

19. Project Budget and Schedule
Project Eligibility
A. Has the project been reviewed by the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee? Yes☒ No☐ If “YES,” identify the date and provide a copy or link to the agenda.

If "NO," provide an explanation).

B. Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body? Yes☒ No☐ If "NO," provide expected date:_May 11, 2026_________________ C. Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding? Yes☐ No☒ (If "YES," provide an explanation on a separate page)
D. For "bikeways," does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria Yes☒ No☐ pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual? E. 1. Is the project categorically exempt from CEQA, pursuant to CCR Section 15301(c), Yes☒ No☐ Existing Facility?

2. If “NO” above, is the project is exempt from CEQA for another reason? Yes☐ No☐ Cite the basis for the exemption. __________________________ N/A☐ If the project is not exempt, please check “NO,” and provide environmental documentation, as appropriate.

F. Estimated Completion Date of project (month and year): July, 2027 G. Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility, or has Yes☒ No☐ the claimant arranged for such maintenance by another agency? (If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility, please identify below and provide the agreement.

H. Is a Complete Streets Checklist required for this project ? Yes☐ No☒ If the amount requested is over $250,000 or if the total project phase or construction phase is over $250,000, a Complete Streets checklist is likely required. Please attach the Complete Streets checklist or record of review, as applicable. More information and the form may be found here: https://mtc.ca.gov/planning/transportation/complete-streets Project Phase TDA 3 Other Funds Total Cost Estimated Completion (month/year)
Bike/Ped Plan 0 n/a n/a
ENV n/a May 2026
PA&ED n/a n/a
PS&E - 350,000 350,000
ROW n/a n/a
CON 372,723 3,000,000 3,372,723
Total Cost 372,723 3,350,000 3,722,723

EXHIBIT B
238
ATTACHMENT 1

EXHIBIT B
239
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ITEM NO. 6.11
DATE: May 11, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brent Smith, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Resolution recommending the Livermore City Council declare Livermore a Vision Zero community and adopting a Vision Zero Action Plan with the clear goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries on city streets.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution:

1. Adopting as policy direction the tenants of Vision Zero with the expressed goal of reducing the number of fatal and serious injury crashes along all roadways under the jurisdiction of the City to zero;

2. Adopting the Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan;

3. Directing City departments, leadership, and staff to share the responsibilities for proactively encouraging and supporting Vision Zero in all facets and aspects of their mission, administration, and service delivery; and

4. Directing the City Manager to:
a. Develop procedures and programs to further the goals and objectives of Vision Zero and take data-driven actions to achieve zero fatal and serious injury crashes based on available crash data, community input, and the “eight E’s” of engagement: equity, engineering, encouragement, education, enforcement, emergency medical services, and evaluation; b. Propose to prioritize funding and availability of staff resources for implementing Vision Zero projects and programs;
c. Adopt and proactively encourage the application of the Federal Highway Administration’s list of Proven Safety Countermeasures;
d. Revise design criteria for new and existing roadways to achieve context-appropriate operating speeds while incorporating sustainable, self-enforcing design principles reflecting current best practices in context-sensitive and people-centric design, and prioritizing context-sensitive people-centric judgment over numerical warrants; e. Review laws, ordinances, rules, policies, procedures, and regulations for conflictive or contrary language and provide remedy through administrative, collaborative, or legislative action;
f. Develop and maintain effective partnerships with other agencies, entities, organizations, community groups, and stakeholders to further the goals of and support for Vision Zero; and 240
g. Provide ongoing evaluation and performance measures and present to City Council on a regular basis a report on the initial and ongoing status of achieving the goal of zero fatal and serious injury crashes.

DECISION TYPE
Administrative

SUMMARY
Vision Zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. As of today, nearly 80 communities have formally adopted Vision Zero strategies nationwide. The City of Livermore (City) is a recipient of the FY 24 Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant to develop a Vision Zero Action Plan.

The goal of the Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan (Plan) is to establish a transformative approach to transportation safety based on the principle that no loss of life is acceptable. The Plan identifies priority safety issues through data analysis and community input and outlines a coordinated set of strategies to address them. The Plan must be reviewed and updated at a minimum of every five years. In addition, staff expects to prepare annual reports and biennial presentations to City Council to track progress toward reducing and eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

Staff recommends the Livermore City Council declare Livermore a Vision Zero community and adopt a Vision Zero Action Plan with the clear goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries on City streets. A Letter from the Mayor to all the residents is included in Attachment 1 and will be inserted in the Final Vision Zero Action Plan.

DISCUSSION
According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, each year, approximately 40,000 people are killed in traffic collisions in the United States. In a study comparing 19 peer nations, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that the United States has the highest traffic death rate per person.

From 2020 to 2024 in Livermore, 14 people were killed in 11 fatal crashes on City streets, and 48 people suffered life-changing injuries in 46 severe-injury crashes. Victims included two pedestrians and one bicyclist who died, along with 12 pedestrians and seven bicyclists who were seriously injured. The leading causes of these fatal and severe crashes were unsafe speed, driving under the influence, and motorists failing to yield the right of way.

One death or serious injury on City streets is one too many, and City and departmental leadership are dedicated to strategies that aim to reduce and eliminate deaths and serious injuries on City streets.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has committed to eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the nation’s roadways using a data-driven interdisciplinary approach modeled after Vision Zero, followed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), who has adopted the goal of moving toward zero deaths with a focus on using proven effective strategies and countermeasures. 241
Vision Zero is a public health-based traffic safety strategy with a vision of reducing and eventually eliminating traffic deaths and serious injuries, using a data driven multi-disciplinary and Safe System Approach, that also increases safe, healthy equitable mobility for all.

The Federal Highway Administration identifies six principles that form the basis of the Safe System Approach: deaths and serious injuries are unacceptable, humans make mistakes, humans are vulnerable, responsibility is shared, safety is proactive, and redundancy is crucial.

Vision Zero recognizes that while human error will always occur, a combination of engineering, education and enforcement measures can reduce the likelihood of human error and reduce the consequences of error, and therefore, reduce collisions leading to death or severe injuries.

Since its adoption by New York City in 2014, Vision Zero has gained significant momentum across the United States. Today, major cities such as Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, along with many mid-sized and smaller communities, have adopted Vision Zero as a framework for improving roadway safety.

Development of the Plan is funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Plan development began in September 2025, immediately after the execution of the grant funding agreement. The project team, made up of City staff and consultants, collected historical collision data, conducted extensive community outreach, identified high injury network and high collision profiles, and recommended implementable action plans and safety projects that are suitable for future SS4A, Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and other safety-related grant opportunities.

Community and stakeholder input was vital to the development of the Plan. To engage the community and stakeholders, the project team conducted several virtual and in-person meetings, as well as a youthfocused workshop at Livermore High School to engage students who are new or future drivers. In addition, project flyers were posted in downtown kiosks, the local newspaper, and City social media platforms, and were distributed to school parents through district-wide email blasts. Feedback and comments were received through outreach meetings and nearly 626 comments were received through the project website between December 2025 and February 2026.

A total of 13 high collision corridors and 12 collision profiles were developed based on the fatality and severe injury collision data between 2020 and 2024. The high collision corridors are shown in Attachment 2, and the collision profiles are listed below. More details are included in the Plan. • Profile 1: Address collisions near the school zones
• Profile 2: Address collisions between age group 20-39 • Profile 3: Address collisions that occurred at Non-Signalized Intersections • Profile 4: Reduce collisions on 25mph streets
• Profile 5: Address collisions that occurred at Signalized Intersections • Profile 6: Reduce Nighttime collisions
• Profile 7: Reduce Broadside collisions
• Profile 8: Address Motorcycle collisions
• Profile 9: Address Pedestrian collisions
• Profile 10: Address driving under the influence (DUI) • Profile 11: Reduce Unsafe Speed collisions
• Profile 12: Address Bicycle collisions
242
In addition, this Plan also recommends the following six (6) projects that are aligned with the Federal Highway Administration’s list of Proven Safety Countermeasures and suitable for future SS4A, HSIP and other safety-related grant opportunities. More details are included in the Plan. • Project 1: First Street-Holmes Street corridor safety improvements • Project 2: Bike safety improvements and gap closures
• Project 3: Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Improvements • Project 4: Improve signalized intersections with protected left turns • Project 5: Citywide Street Light inventory and improvements • Project 6: Citywide Sign improvements

FISCAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE IMPACTS
Eighty percent of the funding for developing the Plan will be derived from the SS4A grant. The remaining twenty percent of the funding has already been funded with Measure BB Street/Road operational funds (Fund 552) as part of the approved FY 2025-27 Operating Budget. The proposed safety improvements in the Plan will be programmed and implemented as part of the City’s Capital Improvement Program.

COMMUNITY PILLAR
1: A Safe Community That Thrives
GOAL
10: Work to maintain a safe and efficient local transportation network and address safety concerns

ATTACHMENTS

1. Letter from the Mayor

2. High Collision Network

3. Resolution

4. Exhibit A - Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan
Prepared by: Joanna Liu
Senior Transportation Engineer
Approved by:
____________________________________
Marianna A. Burch
City Manager
Fiscal Review by:
____________________________________
Tina Olson
Administrative Services Director
243
ATTACHMENT 1
244
70 City of Livermore
9,6,21 =(52
&LW\RI/LYHUPRUH
TJKM
$,5:$< %/
,6$%(/ $9
: -$&.
/21'21 %/
+$*(0$1 1 '5
085'( // /1
(
( 9$//(&
5 2/,9,1
$/'(1/1
1257 +
&$1<216 3:
&2//,(5 &$ 1<21
5' (67$1/(<%/
( $, 5:$<
.,77< +$:.
%/
5'
'22/$1
5'
(9,1(<$5' $9
0 %/
&
(
&
-
$1
The map illustrates the 13 corridors onthe high-injury network based on KSI collisions in the City of Livermore.

Rank Corridors

A VASCO RD

B FIRST ST

C AIRWAY BLVD

D EAST AVE

E JACK LONDON BLVD

F MURRIETA BLVD

G FOURTH ST

H LAS POSITAS RD

I LIVERMORE AVE

J N CANYONS PKWY

K RAILROAD AVE

L SOUTHFRONT RD

M VALLECITOS RD
Vision Zero Action Plan 71
9,6,21 =(52
&LW\RI/LYHUPRUH
TJKM
),567 67
+2/0(667
($67$9
69$6&25'
1 /,9(5025(
$9
6 /,9(5025(
$9
'$/721
$9
%/8(%(/ / '5
19$6&25'
) 2857+
67 &2//(*( $9
%52$'0225
67 -81&7,21
$9
32572/$ $9
1 0855,(7$ %/
6&(1,&$9
5$,/52$' $9
3,1(67
-(16(1
67 635,1 *7 2:1 %/
1367
$552<2 5'
0,1(6
5'
6/67
&21&$1121%/
&(175$/
$9
&+$5/27 7( :<
( / &$ 0,1,72
0$'(,5$
:<
:$// 67
1/67
$5/(1 ( :<
6(&21'67
(&,726
5'
1257 +)5217 5'
1$$9
683(5,25
'5
$0(6
67 *5((19,//(5'
%5,6$
67 &$7$/,1$ '5
+,//&5(67
$9
/$8*+/,1
5'
/$6 326 ,7$65'
9$1&
2 89(5
:<
6287+)52175'
1 0,1(6 5'
3$77(5621 3$66 5'
1$7,2
1$/ '5
:(7025(
5'
/$6 326,7$6 5'
:(17(
67 $9
5$,/
6 .
%
&21 ( % / 6
*
025
,
)
$
$
0 '
/
+ 

5$1. &RUULGRUV
$ 9$6&25'% ),56767& $,5:$<%/
' ($67$9
( -$&./21'21%/9') 0855,(7$%/9'
* )2857+67+ /$6326,7$65'
, /,9(5025($9(- 1&$1<2163.:<
. 5$,/52$'$9
/ 6287+)52175'
0 9$//(&,7265'
+,1&RUULGRUV
     
0LOHV
m
ATTACHMENT 2
245
1 RESOLUTION NO. ________

IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LIVERMORE, CALIFORNIA

A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE LIVERMORE CITY COUNCIL

DECLARE LIVERMORE A VISION ZERO COMMUNITY AND

ADOPTING A VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN WITH THE CLEAR GOAL

OF ELIMINATING TRAFFIC FATALITIES AND SEVERE INJURIES ON

CITY STREETS
The City of Livermore’s Vision Statement is, “We strive to create a safe, healthy, welcoming city for all our diverse community members: residents, visitors, and businesses”, and the City of Livermore’s Mission Statement is, “We work to enhance the quality of life for Livermore community members by providing safe, accessible public amenities”.

In the City of Livermore’s 2023-2028 Citywide Strategic Plan, Objective 1 of Goal 10 of the Community Pillar of “A Safe Community That Thrives” is to support ongoing opportunities to enhance the safety and efficiency of City streets for all modes of travel.

In the Circulation Element of the City’s 2003-2025 General Plan (as amended July 2014), Goal CIR-1 is to provide safe, efficient, comfortable and convenient mobility for all users.

According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, each year, approximately 40,000 people are killed in traffic collisions in the United States. In a study comparing 19 peer nations, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that the United States has the highest traffic death rate per person.

Between 2020 to 2024, 14 people died (11 fatal collisions), and 48 suffered severe life-changing injuries (46 severe injury collisions) on the City of Livermore’s streets. Among these, two pedestrians and one bicyclist died, and 12 pedestrians and seven bicyclists suffered severe, life-changing injuries. The most common primary collision factor for crashes, where people were killed or seriously injured, was traveling at unsafe speed, driving under the influence, followed by failure of motorist to yield the right of way.

One death or serious injury on City streets is one too many, and City and departmental leadership are dedicated to strategies that aim to reduce and eliminate deaths and serious injuries on City streets.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has committed to eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the nation’s roadways using a data-driven interdisciplinary approach modeled after Vision Zero, followed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), who has adopted the goal of moving toward zero deaths with a focus on using proven effective strategies and countermeasures. 246
2 RESOLUTION NO. ________
Vision Zero is a public health-based traffic safety strategy to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries, using a data driven multidisciplinary and Safe System Approach, that also increases safe, healthy equitable mobility for all.

The Federal Highway Administration identifies six principles that form the basis of the Safe System approach: deaths and serious injuries are unacceptable, humans make mistakes, humans are vulnerable, responsibility is shared, safety is proactive, and redundancy is crucial.

Vision Zero recognizes that while human error will always occur, a combination of engineering, education and enforcement measures can reduce the likelihood of human error and reduce the consequences of error, and therefore, reduce collisions leading to death or severe injuries.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Livermore, that the City Council adopt as policy direction the tenants of Vision Zero with the expressed goal of reducing the number of fatal and serious injury crashes along all roadways under the jurisdiction of the City to zero.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopt the Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan, attached and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City departments, leadership, and staff will strive to proactively encourage and support Vision Zero in the City’s mission, administration, and service delivery.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby directed to:

1. Develop procedures and programs to further the goals and objectives of Vision Zero and take data-driven actions to achieve zero fatal and serious injury crashes, based on available crash data, community input, and the “eight E’s” of engagement, equity, engineering, encouragement, education, enforcement, emergency medical services and evaluation; and

2. Propose to prioritize funding and availability of staff resources for implementing Vision Zero projects and programs; and

3. Adopt and proactively encourage the application of the Federal Highway Administration’s list of Proven Safety Countermeasures; and

4. Revise design criteria for new and existing roadways to achieve contextappropriate operating speeds while incorporating sustainable, self-enforcing design principles, reflecting current best practices in context-sensitive and people-centric design, and prioritizing context-sensitive people-centric judgment over numerical warrants; and

5. Review laws, ordinances, rules, policies, procedures, and regulations for conflictive or contrary language and provide remedy through administrative, collaborative, or legislative action; and
247
3 RESOLUTION NO. ________

6. Develop and maintain effective partnerships with other agencies, entities, organizations, community groups, and stakeholders to further the goals of and support for Vision Zero; and

7. Provide for ongoing evaluation and performance measurements and present to City Council on a regular basis a report on the initial and ongoing status of achieving the goal of zero fatal and serious injury crashes.

On motion of Council Member ______________________, seconded by Council Member ______________________, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted on May 11, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ /s/ Kimberly Cilley_____
Helena Graves Kimberly D. Cilley
Acting City Clerk City Attorney
Exhibit A – Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan
248
Vision Zero Action Plan 1
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO

ACTION PLAN
Prepared by
May 2026 City of Livermore
EXHIBIT A Page 1 of 288
249

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
EXHIBIT A Page 2 of 288
250
i City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Design & Layout by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Photographs provided by TJKM Transportation Consultants 4305 Hacienda Dr. # 550,
Pleasanton, CA 94588

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Copyright © 2026 TJKM Transportation Consultants
No portion of this report may be used or reproduced without the prior written consent of the City of Livermore.

EXHIBIT A Page 3 of 288
251
Vision Zero Action Plan ii
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
WHAT IS A VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN? 2
ABOUT VISION ZERO 4
A CALL TO ACTION TO MAKE LIVERMORE’S STREETS SAFE 10
VISION STATEMENT AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES 18
BUILDING ON EXISTING EFFORTS AND ALIGNING WITH VISION ZERO 20 PEOPLE AT THE CENTER 32
DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS 48
HIGH INJURY NETWORK 68
COUNTERMEASURES TOOLBOX & COLLISION PROFILES 74
RECOMMENDED SAFETY PROJECTS 103
IMPLEMENTABLE ACTIONS 128
VISION ZERO STAKEHOLDER WORK PLAN 148
PARTNERSHIP 150
FUNDING & IMPLEMENTATION 152
FUNDING STRATEGY 154
MONITORING & EVALUATION 156
LIST OF APPENDIX:

Appendix A: Goals and policies of existing planning documents Appendix B: Public comments with map input data
Appendix C: Collision data and analysis
Appendix D: Countermeasure Toolbox
EXHIBIT A Page 4 of 288
252
iii City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
ACS - American Community Survey: a U.S. census survey that helps local officials, community leaders, and businesses understand the changes
taking place in their communities
ADT - Average Daily Traffic refers to vehicle traffic volumes ATP - Active Transportation Plan
BCR - BenefitCcost Ratio: Indicator used to quantify project benefits about project costs CIP - Capital Improvement Plan
COLLISION DATA - Information collected about
collisions, including location, time, causes, and
outcomes, is used to identify patterns and recommend safety measures COLLISION SEVERITY - Defined as the intensity
of collisions typically in the following categories:
fatal, severe injury, other visible injury, and complaint of pain. These are terms used in the report to address injury collisions
COMPLETE STREETS - Streets designed and operated to enable safe, attractive, and comfortable access and travel for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities CRF - Crash Reduction Factor: The percentage of the
expected effect of a countermeasure or safety
project towards reducing collisions
DRIVER BEHAVIOR - Actions and reactions of drivers,
which can affect road safety, such as speeding,
distracted driving, or driving under the influence
EMS - Emergency Medical Services
FHWA - Federal Highway Administration: the federal
agency responsible for managing the nation’s
highway system, including bridges and tunnels
FIRST HARMFUL EVENT - First event that resulted in
injury, fatality, or property damage during a traffic
collision
HIGH - INJURY NETWORK (HIN): A network of streets
identified through collision data analysis as having the

GLOSSARY
EXHIBIT A Page 5 of 288
253
Vision Zero Action Plan iv
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
highest concentration of severe and fatal traffic injuries KSI - killed (fatal) and severe injury collisions
MANNER OF COLLISION - It describes how the
vehicles involved in the collision collided with each
other or with other objects, which is the type of collision (e.g. Broadside, rear end) PEDESTRIAN SAFETY - Measures and design elements aimed at protecting pedestrians from traffic-related injuries and fatalities PRIMARY CONTRIBUTING FACTOR - Defined as
contributing causes of collisions
RRFB - Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS) - Programs
and infrastructure improvements designed to make
it safe and easier for children to walk and bike to
school
SS4A - Safe streets and roads for all. A federal funding program that provides $5 billion nationwide over five
years (2022–2026) to help reduce roadway fatalities
TRAFFIC FATALITY - A death resulting from injuries
sustained in a motor vehicle collision
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT - Actions taken by law enforcement to promote compliance with traffic laws, including issuing citations for speeding, running red
lights, or other violations
VISION ZERO - A strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all
WALKABILITY - The measure of how friendly an area
is to walking, considering factors such as the presence and condition of sidewalks, crosswalks, streetlights and overall traffic safety
ZERO TRAFFIC DEATHS - The ultimate goal of vision
zero initiatives, is to eliminate fatalities caused by traffic collisions
EXHIBIT A Page 6 of 288
254
v City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The development of the City of Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan reflects a collaborative and community-driven effort made possible through the active participation of residents, stakeholders, and partner organizations. The City deeply values the input received through public engagement activities, meetings, and outreach efforts, which played a critical role in shaping a plan that reflects community priorities and addresses local safety needs.

We extend our sincere appreciation to Livermore residents, community organizations, and partner agencies for their thoughtful feedback and meaningful contributions throughout the planning process. We also recognize and thank City of Livermore staff and stakeholders for their ongoing leadership, technical expertise, and coordination, which were essential in aligning the VZAP with existing policies, programs, and ongoing initiatives.

This report is dedicated to the 14 individuals who lost their lives on Livermore’s streets between 2020 and 2024. Their loss is a profound reminder that traffic fatalities and serious injuries are preventable, and that every life must be valued and protected.

Note: Throughout this plan, references to the “City” refer to the City of Livermore municipal government.

Council Members
John Marchand. Mayor
Kristie Wang, Vice Mayor
Ben Barrientos, Council Member
Evan Branning, Council Member
Steven Dunbar, Council Member
City of Livermore Staff
Joanna X. J. Liu
Senior Transportation Engineer
Kristina Mai
Associate Civil Engineer
Juan Tenorio
Assistant Engineer
Gabriel Sendaydiego
Assistant Engineer
EXHIBIT A Page 7 of 288
255
Vision Zero Action Plan vi
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Stakeholder Members
Kaitlyn Harrison, Livermore Community Development Department/Planning Division James Petersen, Livermore Public Works Department
Judy Erlandson, Livermore Public Works Department
Carl Brown, Livermore Public Works Department
Scott Harrison, Livermore Police Department
Frances Earl, Livermore Community Development Department/Housing & Human Services Division Jas Sidhu, Livermore Risk Management Division
Ryan Rucker, Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department
Mathew Fuzie, Livermore Area Recreational and Park District Cyrus Sheik, Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority
Kim McNeely, Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District Michelle Pechette, Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District Robert Prinz, Bike East Bay
Matt Sollars, Sandia National Laboratory
Michelle Walker-Wade, Sandia National Laboratory
Scott Wilson, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Melissa Poulos, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Andrew Billon, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Kara Klotchman, Livermore Downtown Inc.

Ruta Jariwala
Project Lead
Rutvij Patel
Project Manager
Himangi Mutha
Transportation Planner
Prepared by:

Ruta Jariwala, PE, TE
Professional Civil Engineer & Project Manager,
T J K M Inc.

EXHIBIT A Page 8 of 288
256
vii City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 9 of 288
257
Vision Zero Action Plan viii
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

LEADERSHIP COMMITMENT

PLACEHOLDER FOR THE LETTER FROM THE MAYOR
EXHIBIT A Page 10 of 288
258
ix City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO POLICY RESOLUTION TO BE PLACES HERE
EXHIBIT A Page 11 of 288
259
Vision Zero Action Plan x
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO POLICY RESOLUTION TO BE PLACES HERE
EXHIBIT A Page 12 of 288
260
Vision Zero Action Plan xi
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO POLICY RESOLUTION TO BE PLACES HERE
EXHIBIT A Page 13 of 288
261
Vision Zero Action Plan xii
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO POLICY RESOLUTION TO BE PLACES HERE
EXHIBIT A Page 14 of 288
262
xiii City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION ZERO STAKEHOLDER GROUP
Reaching the Vision Zero goal requires a coordinated and strategic planning effort to build community consensus and regional support. The development of the City of Livermore Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) has been a collaborative endeavor, strengthened by the involvement of a diverse group of stakeholders representing multiple City departments, partner agencies, and organizations.

As part of the City’s Vision Zero initiative, a multidisciplinary stakeholder group was convened to bring together a wide range of perspectives and to guide the development of the Action Plan. The active participation of community members through in-person and virtual meetings was essential in ensuring that the Plan is comprehensive, data-driven, and responsive to local needs. The City extends its sincere appreciation to all participants for their valuable input, which played a critical role in shaping the VZAP.

The City of Livermore also thanks the City staff and stakeholders for their continued collaboration and technical support throughout the planning process. Their feedback and expertise were instrumental in aligning the Action Plan with local priorities, adopted policies, and existing programs.

Stakeholder group members include representatives from City departments, local and regional agencies, school districts, transit providers, organizations, and other partner organizations, such as:

Livermore Community Development Planning Division
Livermore Public Works Department
Livermore Police Department
Livermore Community Development Housing &
Human Services Division
Livermore Risk Management Division
Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department
Livermore Area Recreation and Park District
Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority
Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
Bike East Bay
Sandia National Laboratory
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore Downtown Inc.

EXHIBIT A Page 15 of 288
263
Vision Zero Action Plan xiv
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 16 of 288
264
xv City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 17 of 288
265
Vision Zero Action Plan xvi
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
approach to roadway safety, the City of Livermore
strengthens its competitiveness for SS4A funding
and encourages future investments to focus on the
community’s most critical, traffic safety needs.

SAFE STREETS FOR ALL ACTION

PLAN REQUIREMENTS
For the City of Livermore, developing a VZAP is a
critical first step in pursuing funding through the
Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) grant program. The VZAP directly aligns the City’s safety goals with the SS4A program’s core objective of
eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries.

In addition, the Plan establishes a clear, data-driven, and implementable strategy for achieving these outcomes, demonstrating how Livermore will prioritize projects, apply proven countermeasures, and invest
funding where it can have the greatest safety impact. By documenting a comprehensive, data-driven Action Plan Components Page
Leadership Commitment and Goal Setting viii,ix, x, xi & Page 10 Planning Structure xiii, Page 32-37, Page 130-131,

Safety Analysis Page 48-72
Engagement and Collaboration Page 32-47
Policy and Process Changes Page 4-7, Page 18-19
Strategy and Project Selections Page 103-127
Progress and Transparency Page 2-3, Page 128-147
Action Plan Adoption Date May,2026
EXHIBIT A Page 18 of 288
266
xvii City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 19 of 288
267
Vision Zero Action Plan 1
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

INTRODUCTION
The City of Livermore is advancing a bold commitment to improving roadway safety through its Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP), which establishes a clear direction toward eliminating traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries. This effort reflects Livermore’s dedication to protecting its residents’ well-being, supporting a high quality of life, and ensuring that its transportation system serves people safely and equitably.

As a growing Tri-Valley community, Livermore’s streets support a wide range of daily activities, from students traveling to school and families accessing parks and neighborhoods, to commuters connecting to regional job centers and transit services. With this diversity of users comes a responsibility to design and manage streets that prioritize safety for everyone, regardless of age, ability, or mode of travel.

This Action Plan is grounded in the Safe System approach, which recognizes that people will make mistakes and that the transportation system must be designed to minimize the likelihood of those mistakes resulting in severe outcomes. Rather than placing responsibility solely on individual behavior, this approach emphasizes shared accountability across roadway design, speed management, policies, and education. By addressing both systemic risks and location-specific challenges, Livermore can create a more forgiving and resilient transportation network.

The VZAP identifies priority safety issues through data analysis and community input and outlines a coordinated set of strategies to address them. These strategies focus on improving roadway design, managing speeds, enhancing visibility and accessibility, and strengthening education and outreach efforts. Together, they form a comprehensive framework for reducing risk across the entire transportation system.

While some improvements can be implemented in the near term, achieving lasting change will require continued investment, collaboration, and commitment. This plan serves as both an immediate action guide and a long-term roadmap, positioning Livermore to make meaningful progress toward a future where all roadway users can travel safely and confidently.

EXHIBIT A Page 20 of 288
268
2 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
WHAT IS A VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN?
A Vision Zero document serves as a roadmap for coordinating efforts across multiple sectors and stakeholders to create safe, more sustainable transportation systems and ultimately achieve the goal of zero traffic fatalities and severe injuries.

A Vision Zero document typically encompasses a comprehensive strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while promoting safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all road users. The specific contents of a Vision Zero document can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the goals of the initiative, but here are some common elements often included:

EXHIBIT A Page 21 of 288
269
Vision Zero Action Plan 3
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
1 VISION STATEMENT:

A clear and concise statement outlining the ultimate
goal of achieving zero traffic fatalities and severe injuries within a specified timeframe. 2 POLICY FRAMEWORK:

A set of guiding principles and policies that prioritize safety and promote a holistic approach to transportation planning, design, and operations. 3 DATA ANALYSIS:

An analysis of collision data to identify high-risk areas, vulnerable road users, contributing factors, and trends in traffic collisions and injuries.
4 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES:

Clear and measurable goals and objectives for reducing traffic fatalities and severe injuries, often broken down by target groups, such as pedestrians,
bicyclists, motorists, and public transit users.
5 STRATEGIES AND INTERVENTIONS:

Identifying and prioritizing specific strategies and
interventions to improve safety, including engineering, enforcement, education, and evaluation measures. These may include road design improvements, speed management, targeted enforcement campaigns, public awareness campaigns, and policy changes. 6 ACTION PLAN:

A detailed plan outlining how each strategy and intervention will be implemented, including timelines, responsible agencies or departments, and funding
sources.
7 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT:

Metrics and indicators to track progress towards
safety goals, evaluate the effectiveness of implemented interventions, and adjust strategies as needed.
8 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT:

Strategies for engaging with stakeholders, including government agencies, law enforcement, community organizations, advocacy groups, and the public, to promote collaboration and support for Vision Zero initiatives. 9 EVALUATION AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT:

Mechanisms for evaluating the impact of Vision
Zero interventions and making adjustments based
on lessons learned and emerging best practices.

EXHIBIT A Page 22 of 288
270
4 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

ABOUT VISION ZERO
VISION ZERO IS A SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURE FROM THE STATUS QUO IN SEVERAL WAYS:
1 Vision Zero acknowledges that traffic deaths and
serious injuries are preventable, and it sets a goal
of eliminating them in an established period with
clear, measurable strategies.
2 Vision Zero starts with the ethical belief that
everyone has the right to move safely in their
communities. To achieve a safe transportation
system, everyone must consider the system as a
whole.
3 Vision Zero believes that safe transportation systems and related policies should be designed to prevent inevitable mistakes from resulting in
life-altering injuries or death.

This is a fundamental shift from a traditional approach to traffic safety that accepts the loss of life as inevitable and unpreventable. Vision Zero requires a comprehensive approach that seeks to achieve safe roads, safe speeds, safe vehicles, safe road users, and post-crash care.

Vision Zero is a heartfelt belief that no one should be killed or seriously injured while traveling along, across, or around our streets and roadways.

WHAT IS A VISION ZERO?
“Vision zero is a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all” 4 Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach that
brings together diverse stakeholders to address
the complex problem of traffic safety.
5 It acknowledges that many factors contribute to
safe mobility, including roadway design, speed,
enforcement, behavior change, technology, and
policies, and sets clear strategies to achieve the
shared goal of zero fatalities and serious injuries.

EXHIBIT A Page 23 of 288
271
Vision Zero Action Plan 5
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Vision Zero began in Sweden in 1997 establishing a transformative approach to transportation safety based on the principle that no loss of life is acceptable. This framework recognizes that while human error is inevitable, fatalities and serious injuries are preventable through safe system design. Since its adoption by New York City in 2014, Vision Zero has gained significant momentum across the United States. Today, major cities such as Chicago, Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles, along with many mid-sized and smaller communities, have adopted Vision Zero as a framework for improving roadway safety. Overall, nearly 79 communities have formally adopted Vision Zero strategies nationwide.

SAFE SYSTEM = SAFE MOBILITY
Early results from leading Vision Zero cities demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. For example, New York City experienced a measurable decline in traffic fatalities following implementation, including some of the lowest fatality totals on record. These outcomes highlight the value of combining street design improvements, speed management, policy changes, and public education to reduce crash severity and save lives. Today, Vision Zero is widely recognized as a national best practice and is supported by federal initiatives such as the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program, providing cities like Livermore with a proven, data-driven framework to advance a proactive and system wide approach to eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Traffic deaths are INEVITABLE
PERFECT human behavior
Prevent COLLISIONS
INDIVIDUAL responsibility
Saving lives is EXPENSIVE

VISION ZERO
Traffic deaths are PREVENTABLE
Integrate HUMAN FAILING in approach
Prevent FATAL AND SEVERE CRASHES
SYSTEMS approach
Saving lives is NOT EXPENSIVE
VS
Cities that have Adopted Vision Zero
(Source: Vision Zero Network)
EXHIBIT A Page 24 of 288
272
6 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH
Reaching zero deaths requires implementing a Safe
System approach, which is founded on the principles that humans make mistakes and that human bodies have limited tolerance to collision impacts.

In a Safe System, those mistakes should never lead
to death. Applying the Safe System approach involves anticipating human mistakes by designing and managing road infrastructure to keep the risk
of a mistake low. When a mistake leads to a collision, the impact on the human body does not result in a fatality or severe injury. Road design and management should encourage safe speeds and
manipulate appropriate collision angles to reduce
injury severity.

Six principles form the basis of the
Safe System approach:
• Deaths and serious injuries are unacceptable
• Humans make mistakes
• Humans are vulnerable
• Responsibility is shared
• Safety is proactive
• Redundancy is crucial
The Safe System approach requires a
supporting safety culture that places
safety first and foremost in road system
investment decisions.

To achieve our zero deaths vision,
everyone must accept that fatal and severe injury collisions are unacceptable and preventable.

EXHIBIT A Page 25 of 288
273
Vision Zero Action Plan 7
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Committing zero traffic deaths means addressing all aspects of safety through the following five Safe System elements that, together, create a holistic approach with layers of protection for road users:

The Safe System approach addresses the safety of all road users, including those who walk, bike, drive, ride transit, and travel by other
modes.

SAFE ROAD USERS
Humans are unlikely to survive high-speed collisions. Reducing speeds can accommodate human injury tolerances in three ways: reducing impact forces, providing additional time for drivers to stop, and improving visibility.

SAFE SPEEDS
Vehicles are designed and regulated to minimize the occurrence and severity of collisions using safety measures that incorporate the latest technology.

SAFE VEHICLES
Designing to accommodate human mistakes
and injury tolerances can significantly reduce
the severity of collisions that do occur. Examples
include physically separating people traveling at
different speeds, providing dedicated times for
different users to move through a space, and
alerting users to hazards and other road users.

SAFE ROADS
When a person is injured in a collision, they rely on emergency first responders to quickly locate them, stabilize their injury, and transport them to medical facilities. Post-crash care also includes forensic analysis at the collision site, traffic incident management, and other activities. It can also include healthcare providers sharing anonymized ER (Emergency Room) data on collision victims that may not have been reported to law enforcement with local agencies to better identify collision trends, target audiences for focused community engagement, or address social needs like car seats and bicycle helmets.

POST-CRASH CARE
EXHIBIT A Page 26 of 288
274
8 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 27 of 288
275
Vision Zero Action Plan 9
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Safe System approach requires a
SUPPORTING SAFETY culture that prioritizes
safety in road system investment decisions!
To achieve OUR ZERO DEATHS VISION,
everyone must accept that fatal and severe
injury collisions are preventable!
EXHIBIT A Page 28 of 288
276
10 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
A CALL TO ACTION TO MAKE LIVERMORE’S

STREETS SAFE
Traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries remain a significant and preventable public safety challenge, both nationally and locally. In 2023, approximately 40,9901 people were killed in traffic crashes across the United States, a number nearly equal to half the population of Livermore.

If such a loss occurred within a single community at once, it would demand immediate action. Yet, because these tragedies occur incrementally, they are often normalized and described as “accidents.” This term implies randomness, when in reality, most crashes are predictable and preventable outcomes shaped by roadway design, speed, and human behavior.

Beyond the immediate loss of life, traffic crashes impose long-term social and economic costs. They impact families and communities, strain emergency response and healthcare systems, and influence how people choose to travel. When residents do not feel safe walking or biking, communities become more auto-dependent, contributing to reduced mobility options, poorer public health outcomes, and increased emissions.
------------------
1Total U.S. traffic fatalities: 40,990 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Traffic Safety Facts Annual Report 2023 (released 2024, used in 2025 planning documents)
EXHIBIT A Page 29 of 288
277
Vision Zero Action Plan 11
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
------------------
2U.S. Census Bureau, 2024-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates LIVERMORE’S TRAVEL PATTERNS AND SAFETY CHALLENGES
Livermore remains largely auto-oriented, with driving accounting for the majority of commute trips, while walking, bicycling, and transit represent a smaller share as shown in the figure below2, even though these modes may be undercounted for non-work trips like errands, school, and recreation. Transit use is also comparatively low, reflecting limited public transit commuting relative to driving.

LIVERMORE MODE OF TRANSPORTATION
EXHIBIT A Page 30 of 288
278
12 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
All Collisions
Pedestrians and bicyclists are involved in 21% of injury collisions, but account for 35% of serious injuries or fatalities.

Bicyclist
13%
Bicyclist
14%
8%
Pedestrian
1%
Pedestrian
Motor Vehicles
79%
Motor Vehicles
65%
KSI Collisions
Although walking and biking represent a small
share of overall commute modes, people walking
and bicycling are disproportionately represented
in serious injury and fatal collisions (as your other
data show). This underscores the need for Vision
Zero strategies that expand safe, comfortable, and
convenient active transportation options, reduce
car dependency where feasible, improve crossing,
bikeway, and transit connections to support safe
trips for all users.

Between 2020 and 2024, pedestrians accounted
for 21 percent of fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions and eight percent of total injury collisions, while bicyclists accounted for 14 percent of KSI collisions and 13 percent of injury collisions see figure share of collisions by mode. This disparity highlights
the increased risk faced by vulnerable road users
and underscores the need for safe, more inclusive
street design.

Most Vulnerable Travellers

SHARE OF VICTIMS WHO WERE INVOLVED

IN FATAL OR SEVERE INJURY BY MODE
EXHIBIT A Page 31 of 288
279
Vision Zero Action Plan 13
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

WHY LIVERMORE IS TAKING ACTION
This Action Plan is grounded in a comprehensive, data-driven process using five years of collision data (January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2024) and focuses on identifying when, where, and why the most serious collisions occur, as well as which road users are most affected. During this period, 833 injury collisions occurred on City streets, including 11 fatal collisions and 46 severe injury collisions. In total, 57 collisions were classified as killed or severely injured (KSI) as shown in the figure below Collision by Severity, resulting in the loss of 14 lives and 48 people sustaining severe injuries.

Traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries are not isolated incidents; they are recurring and preventable events that continue to impact the Livermore community each year. The figure below illustrates a fiveyear trend of collision data, distinguishing between KSI collisions and injury collisions. This figure shows yearly trends in injury and killed-or-seriously-injured (KSI) collisions along the City of Livermore streets from 2020 to 2024, alongside key safety indicators from the Vision Zero analysis.

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
EXHIBIT A Page 32 of 288
280
14 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

THE ROLE OF SPEED IN SEVERE COLLISIONS
A significant component of the VZAP is the recognition that speed kills. Research compiled by the U.S.

Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) shows that the likelihood of fatality is five percent for a pedestrian struck by a vehicle traveling at 20 miles per hour, but the likelihood increases to 40 percent at 30 miles per hour and 100 percent at 50 miles per hour. By designing our streets differently, we can lower vehicle speeds, helping reduce the severity of injuries. Street design changes, combined with public education and targeted enforcement efforts, have the potential to significantly reduce the number of people severely injured or killed in Livermore. ------------------
Note: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Traffic Safety Facts Annual Report 2023 (released 2024, used in 2025 planning documents)
EXHIBIT A Page 33 of 288
281
Vision Zero Action Plan 15
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

KSI COLLISIONS BY SPEED AND MODE
The figure below presents KSI collisions categorized by travel mode and posted speed limit, illustrating how collision severity varies across different roadway speed environments and user types.

The data show that fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions occur across a range of posted speed limits, but the highest number of serious collisions occur on roadways posted at 25 mph. At this speed, collisions involve multiple travel modes, including passenger vehicles, motorcycles, bicyclists, and pedestrians, with passenger vehicles accounting for the largest share.

Serious collisions also occur at higher posted speeds, including 35, 40, 45, and 50 mph, where the presence of vulnerable road users remains notable. As speeds increase, the risk of severe injury or death rises significantly, particularly for pedestrians and bicyclists. Under a Vision Zero framework, this pattern highlights the critical role of speed management in preventing fatal and severe injuries. The concentration of KSI collisions on lower-speed urban streets indicates that simply posting lower speed limits is not enough, street design, traffic calming, and systemic safety improvements are necessary to reduce vehicle speeds and protect all road users, especially those most vulnerable.

Among road users, passenger cars and motorcyclists were most frequently involved, highlighting the need for enhanced speed management and enforcement on moderate-speed corridors.

EXHIBIT A Page 34 of 288
282
16 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL

ISABEL A
V
W JACK

LONDON BL
HAG
E
MAN
N
DR
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E
E
VALLEC
R
OLIVIN

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E

AI RWAY

KITTY HAWK
BL
RD
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
M
C
E
J

MOVING TOWARD A

SAFE LIVERMORE
In response to these findings, the City of
Livermore developed VZAP to advance
a proactive, data-driven and systemwide
approach to safety. By focusing on highrisk corridors and intersections identified through the High-Injury Network as shown in the map KSI Collision Distribution and High-Injury Network, the City is prioritizing investments where they can
have the greatest impact. This plan represents a commitment to preventing future tragedies by addressing the root causes of
severe collisions and creating a transportation system that is safe, equitable, and accessible for all.

Rank Corridors
A VASCO Rd
B FIRST St
C AIRWAY Blvd
D EAST Ave
E JACK LONDON Blvd
F MURRIETA Blvd
G FOURTH St
H LAS POSITAS Rd
I LIVERMORE Ave

J N CANYONS PKWY
K RAILROAD Ave
L SOUTHFRONT Rd
M VALLECITOS Rd
EXHIBIT A Page 35 of 288
283
Vision Zero Action Plan 17
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

FIRST ST

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

N VASCO RD

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N

MURRIETA
BL

SCENIC AV

RAILROAD AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST
ECITOS
RD

NORT HFRONT RD
NA AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

VANCOUVER
WY

SOUTHFRONT RD

N MINES RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
AV
K
B
B G
I
F
A
M D
L
H 580
580
RANK Corridors

A VASCO RD

B FIRST ST

C AIRWAY BL

D EAST AV

E JACK LONDON BLVD

F MURRIETA BLVD

G FOURTH ST

H LAS POSITAS RD

I LIVERMORE AVE

J N CANYONS PKWY

K RAILROAD AV

L SOUTHFRONT RD

M VALLECITOS RD
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
HIN Corridors
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 36 of 288
284
18 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

VISION STATEMENT AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The Vision Zero Stakeholder Group met in early 2025 to develop a vision statement and guiding principles to frame the development and implementation of the VZAP. These principles form the foundation for the city to conduct its Vision Zero work.

VISION STATEMENT
Traffic safety affects our community, neighborhoods, health, and Livermore’s livability. No level of fatality or severe injury is acceptable on our streets because collisions are preventable incidents that can be addressed through improved transportation infrastructure and programming. City’s Vision Zero is a community-driven and data-driven initiative to eliminate preventable traffic fatalities and serious injuries by 2045.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Vision Zero is guided by several key principles designed to create a transportation system without fatalities or severe injuries. Here are the City’s guiding principles of Vision Zero:
1 Human Life and Health are Paramount:

The fundamental principle of Vision Zero is that human
safety, life, and health take priority over all other considerations in the transportation system. Safety is not just one of the goals but the primary objective. Based on
this value, we will evaluate trade-offs and make both
proactive and reactive decisions about street design.
2 Traffic Deaths and Injuries are Preventable:

Vision Zero operates on the belief that traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries are not accidents but preventable, unacceptable incidents. Addressing the root causes, such as road design, vehicle technology, and
user behavior, can prevent these incidents.
3 Human Error is Inevitable and Expected:

People will make mistakes. The transportation system
should be designed to be forgiving and accommodate
human error. Recognizing that people will make mistakes, the system should be designed to discourage errors that could result in severe injuries or fatalities.

We will not victim-blame but seek to understand and
respond compassionately and objectively.

EXHIBIT A Page 37 of 288
285
Vision Zero Action Plan 19
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
4 Slower Streets are Safe Streets
Mobility is the safe and efficient movement of people
and goods through transportation. We will design,
construct, and operate our streets for slower speeds to eliminate all fatal and severe injury collisions and protect our most vulnerable street users. 5 Safety is a Shared Responsibility:

Everyone involved in the transportation system, including policymakers, engineers, vehicle manufacturers, and road users, shares responsibility for safety.

Collaboration across sectors and disciplines is essential to achieving Vision Zero goals. 6 Systemic and Holistic Approach:

Vision Zero advocates for a comprehensive and systemic approach to road safety. This includes considering all aspects of the transportation system, road design, vehicle technology, laws and regulations,
enforcement, and public education. It also requires a
holistic approach to land use and transportation, including policy analysis and changes at the local and regional levels.
7 Data-Driven Decision Making:

Effective Vision Zero strategies rely on accurate and
comprehensive data to identify high-risk locations, behaviors, and populations. Data is used to prioritize interventions, allocate resources, and measure progress. 8 Equity and Inclusivity:

Vision Zero emphasizes the importance of equity
and inclusivity in transportation planning and safety
efforts. Vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians,
cyclists, children, older adults, and people with disabilities, should be given special consideration. Efforts should be made to promote safety improvements that
benefit all communities, especially those historically
underserved.
9 Proactive vs. Reactive Measures:

Vision Zero encourages proactive measures to prevent collisions before they occur, rather than reacting to incidents after they happen. Collision data reveals
where the risk of fatalities and seriously injuries has manifested. A proactive collisions risk assessment
identifies and prioritizes those locations where risk
exists, but collisions experience has yet to materialize.

This involves anticipating potential hazards and addressing them through design and policy. 10 Sustainable and Healthy Communities:

Vision Zero aligns with broader goals of creating sustainable and healthy communities. Safe streets promote walking, cycling, and public transportation, contributing to public health, environmental sustainability, and overall quality of life.

The city’s response will utilize proven safety countermeasures coupled with innovative strategies. We will perform annual monitoring, reporting, and evaluation. We will communicate clearly what resources are necessary to achieve Vision Zero, why street design modifications are proposed, and the basis for prioritizing competing improvements. By adhering to these guiding principles, the city aims to create a transportation system that prioritizes safety, reduces traffic-related fatalities and injuries to zero, and fosters a culture of shared responsibility and proactive prevention.

EXHIBIT A Page 38 of 288
286
20 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

BUILDING ON EXISTING EFFORTS AND ALIGNING

WITH VISION ZERO
The VZAP builds on the City of Livermore’s longstanding commitment to improving roadway safety through coordinated planning, capital investments, and community-based programs. Over the past several years, the City has advanced a comprehensive multimodal program that includes sidewalk and intersection upgrades, bikeway and trail improvements, and targeted safety enhancements along key corridors and within neighborhoods. Programs such as the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program empower residents to identify safety concerns and support proactive measures that reduce speeding and cut-through traffic before serious crashes occur.

Livermore has also established a strong policy foundation through adopted plans and ongoing initiatives, including the General Plan Circulation Element, (as amended), Active Transportation Plan (and Interim Update), Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP), and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Together, these efforts promote complete streets, safe crossings, multimodal connectivity, accessibility for all users, and targeted improvements along high-risk corridors, school areas, downtown streets, and neighborhood roadways.

At the regional level, these efforts are reinforced through partnerships with agencies such as the Alameda County Transportation Commission, which advance Safe Routes to School programs, multimodal corridor planning, and funding strategies aligned with Safe Systems and equity principles. Collectively, these initiatives reflect a shared commitment to improving safety and expanding mobility options across Livermore and the broader region.

EXHIBIT A Page 39 of 288
287
Vision Zero Action Plan 21
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The VZAP strengthens and unifies these existing efforts by placing the prevention of fatal and severe injury collisions at the center of transportation decision-making. While the City has made significant progress through individual projects and programs, Vision Zero provides a framework to prioritize and coordinate future investments based on data, risk, and systemic safety needs.

The following documents and resources were reviewed:

1. City of Livermore General Plan (Circulation Element) | (2003 - 2025) Amend. (2014), as amended

2. Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Active Transportation Plan (ATP) | (2018), Appendices | (2018) and (Design guidelines) | (2018)

3. Interim Update Livermore Active Transportation Plan (ATP) | (2024)

4. City of Livermore Design Standards and Guidelines (Streets) | (2019)

5. City of Livermore Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program | (2020)

6. City of Livermore Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) | (2023 - 2028)

7. City of Livermore Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) | (2025 - 2030)

8. Livermore Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) | (2023)

9. Alameda County Safe Routes to Schools | (2023 - 2024) | (2025)

10. Alameda Countywide Active Transportation Plan | (2020)

11. Alameda Countywide Multimodal Arterial Plan | (2016)

12. Alameda Comprehensive Investment Plan | (2024)

13. LAVTA Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) FY 2016 - 2025 | (2016)

14. Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan | (2022)
Appendix A summarizes the relevant policies and projects from all the reviewed documents.

EXHIBIT A Page 40 of 288
288
22 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 41 of 288
289
Vision Zero Action Plan 23
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The City of Livermore General Plan was adopted
in 2004, and the circulation element was last
amended in 2014. The circulation element aims
to identify the anticipated circulation needs,
indicate the location and extent of the existing and
proposed circulation network, and provide policies
and priorities for circulation system improvements.

The General Plan would balance the need to
provide efficient ways to travel from one place to
another with goals to revitalize Downtown and
limit non-local cut-through traffic on city streets.

The Vision Statement of the ongoing Livermore
General Plan Update is that in 2045, Livermore
will be a community where families and individuals
flourish, and people with diverse experiences and
perspectives work together for the common good.

Land-use policies and resource management will
promote high-quality services and infrastructure
and make Livermore safe and welcoming. The VZAP
goals can be achieved by prioritizing sustainability,
providing multimodal transportation options that
enhance connectivity, reducing reliance on singleoccupancy vehicles, and supporting equitable access for all community members.

FROM PLANS TO IMPLEMENTATION
The VZAP provides a cohesive, actionable framework that builds on Livermore’s existing plans, programs, and investments. By aligning capital projects, policies, and funding strategies with Vision Zero principles, the City can promote future improvements that are targeted, effective, and consistent with long-term safety goals.

This approach is further reinforced through alignment with regional plans and funding programs, ensuring that Livermore’s investments contribute to a broader, connected, and safe transportation network.

By focusing on the High-Injury Network and prioritizing systemic safety strategies, Livermore is advancing a transition from a traditional, vehicle-oriented design paradigm to one that prioritizes safe, equitable, and multimodal travel for all users.

CITY OF LIVERMORE GENERAL PLAN (CIRCULATION ELEMENT) | (2003 - 2025) AMEND. (2014) EXHIBIT A Page 42 of 288
290
24 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Livermore Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails
Active Transportation Plan (ATP) (2018),
along with its supporting Appendices and
Design Guidelines, collectively establish a
comprehensive framework for improving active transportation in the City. The ATP outlines a vision for a vibrant community where people can comfortably walk, bicycle, and
access trails, and identifies key challenges, goals, and implementation strategies to enhance safety, connectivity, and accessibility across the network. The Appendices supplement the plan with detailed technical
analyses, including safety and collision data,
demand modeling, public outreach results,
and project prioritization, providing a strong
LIVERMORE BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND TRAILS ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (ATP) | (2018) (INCLUDES APPENDIX AND DESIGN GUIDELINES)
data-driven foundation for recommended improvements and decision-making. The Design Guidelines document provides context-sensitive design standards and best practices for pedestrian, bicycle, and trail facilities, drawing from national and state guidance such as AASHTO, NACTO, and Caltrans. It serves as a practical toolkit to guide the design and implementation of infrastructure improvements that enhance safety, accessibility, and user comfort. Together, these documents present a coordinated approach that integrates planning, analysis, and design guidance to support the development of a safe, connected, and user-friendly active transportation network, and provide a strong foundation for advancing the City’s VZAP.

EXHIBIT A Page 43 of 288
291
Vision Zero Action Plan 25
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Interim Update of the Livermore Active
Transportation Plan reflects the City of Livermore’s
ongoing commitment to creating a safe, accessible,
and connected active transportation network. By
refreshing the previously adopted 2018 Active
Transportation Plan, this update incorporates new
data on existing conditions, safety improvements,
and community needs. Notably, it integrates the
Local Road Safety Plan to identify and prioritize
critical projects, enhancing safety for pedestrians
and bicyclists. Since 2018, significant achievements
have included over 22 miles of bikeway upgrades
and measurable reductions in bicycle and pedestrian
collisions. The plan’s goals closely align with the
VZAP, prioritizing safety and eliminating trafficrelated fatalities and severe injuries. With strategies focused on improving crosswalks, addressing
barriers like high-volume roads and freeways, and
fostering low-stress walking and biking networks,
Livermore demonstrates its commitment to VZAP’s
core principle: no loss of life is acceptable in
transportation systems.

INTERIM UPDATE LIVERMORE ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN | (2024)
The Livermore Design Standards and Guidelines
is a policy document and an implementation tool
developed to preserve, protect, and promote public
health, safety, and general welfare, as permitted by
State law. The Guidelines pay special attention to
significant streets, considering them as major travel
corridors and the first point of entry to the City. The Standard and Guidelines address the need to provide
adequate automobile circulation in the community
while ensuring the City’s transportation corridors
are well-designed and convey a positive image
through attractive landscaping and appropriate
pedestrian components. The plan aligns with the
proposed VZAP by emphasizing street designs
that promote traffic calming, improve visibility, and
enhance the safety and comfort of all road users,
including pedestrians and cyclists.

CITY OF LIVERMORE DESIGN STANDARDS
AND GUIDELINES (STREETS) | (2019)
EXHIBIT A Page 44 of 288
292
26 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program (NTCP)
intends to utilize traffic calming devices to address
neighborhood traffic issues. The program mainly focuses on local and collector streets. The programs highlight the need for neighborhood participation and consensus-building exercises. NTCP 2020 would improve livability and quality of life in
residential neighborhoods by reducing cut-through
traffic, collisions, and speeding. The goal of NTCP
2020 is to implement measures approved by the
neighborhood to improve the safety and quality
of life of the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists, and
motorists. Through policies and standards, the plan
has addressed key objectives that reflect proposed
improvements and pedestrian/bike management
to operate and manage site pedestrian/bike requirements. The program aligns with the VZAP’s goals by implementing measures to reduce vehicle
speeds and enhance safety in residential areas.

CITY OF LIVERMORE NEIGHBORHOOD
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM (NTCP) | (2020)
The Five-Year City Improvement Plan (CIP) 2023 -
2028 represents capital, operational, and long-term
financial planning activities throughout the City. The
plan represents an ongoing budget process through
which the City identifies, prioritizes, and develops
a multi-year work plan for significant capital
expenditures and associated funding sources. As
a planning tool, the CIP document outlines the
process and activities required to improve public
facilities, including construction, maintenance, and
improvements; infrastructure; land acquisition; and
significant equipment.  The CIP budget presents a
schedule of major public facility improvements that
will be implemented over the next 20 years. This
document provides a CIP identifying a need for
over $420 million in funding for 146 projects over
the next five years. The plan also prioritizes projects and outlines implementation goals and objectives
to guide City staff’s actions over the next several
years. The plan aligns with the proposed VZAP by
prioritizing infrastructure investments that address
high-risk locations, improve pedestrian and cyclist
safety, and support the elimination of traffic-related
fatalities and serious injuries.

CITY OF LIVERMORE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) (2023 - 2028) | (2020) EXHIBIT A Page 45 of 288
293
Vision Zero Action Plan 27
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
LIVERMORE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN | (2023)
The City of Livermore’s Five Year Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP) 2025 - 2030 serves as a comprehensive
planning and budgeting tool that identifies, prioritizes, and funds critical infrastructure and public facility investments across the City. The CIP outlines a coordinated, multiyear program of capital projects that support the City’s General Plan, Strategic Plan, and various master plans, while addressing both new infrastructure needs
and the rehabilitation and replacement of existing
assets. The plan includes a wide range of investments,
including transportation infrastructure, traffic control systems, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, public safety improvements, utilities, and public buildings. Over the five-year period, the CIP identifies approximately $318.7 million in total expenditures, with a strong emphasis on maintaining and upgrading existing infrastructure while also advancing new capital projects. The CIP also reflects a balanced funding strategy, leveraging local revenues, development impact fees, and state and federal grants to support project delivery. The CIP aligns closely with the VZAP by prioritizing investments that enhance roadway
safety, improve pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure, implement traffic calming and signal upgrades, and address high-risk locations across the transportation network.

These coordinated investments support the City’s goal
of eliminating traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries while improving overall mobility, accessibility, and quality of life for all users.

EXHIBIT A Page 46 of 288
294
28 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Alameda County Safe Routes to School (SR2S)
Program (2023 - 2024) is a comprehensive initiative
designed to promote safe, healthy, and sustainable
travel options for students and their families across
the county. The program focuses on making walking,
biking, carpooling, and transit viable and appealing alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle trips, while emphasizing equitable access to resources and programming across diverse communities. The SR2S program integrates education, encouragement, and community
engagement strategies to address barriers to active
transportation, including traffic safety concerns, infrastructure gaps, and lack of awareness. Through activities such as bicycle and pedestrian safety education, school-based events, and outreach campaigns, the
ALAMEDA COUNTY SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS | (2023 - 2024) | (2025) program aims to build confidence among students and parents while fostering long-term behavior change. In addition, the program supports data-driven decision-making by identifying challenges related to the built environment and travel behavior, helping communities understand factors that influence how students travel to and from school. By combining infrastructure awareness with education and incentives, the program has contributed to increasing the number of students using active and shared modes of transportation. The SR2S program aligns with and supports the VZAP by advancing strategies that improve safety around schools, reduce conflicts between roadway users, and encourage safe travel behaviors. Its focus on vulnerable users, particularly children, provides a strong foundation for implementing targeted safety improvements and community-based interventions aimed at eliminating traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries.

The Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) for the City of Livermore is a comprehensive, data-driven framework that identifies, analyzes, and addresses traffic safety concerns on local roadways. Developed with input from stakeholders and the community, the LRSP emphasizes systemic approaches to reduce collision rates and improve pedestrian and cyclist safety, particularly at high-risk intersections and corridors. Key features include strategies to address speeding, nighttime collisions, and pedestrian safety violations through targeted countermeasures such as improved signal timing, advanced crosswalk features, and enhanced roadway lighting. By prioritizing equitable implementation and leveraging funding sources like the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), the LRSP fosters proactive, continuous safety improvements. These efforts align with the City’s VZAP, underscoring the shared commitment to eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries while creating safe streets for all.

LIVERMORE LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN | (2023)
EXHIBIT A Page 47 of 288
295
Vision Zero Action Plan 29
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Alameda Countywide Active Transportation
Plan provides a vision, goals, and priorities to improve walking and biking throughout the 15 diverse
jurisdictions in Alameda County. The Countywide
Transportation Plan sets regional priorities that
support and advance the transportation initiatives
of local agencies. The plan responds to community
concerns by prioritizing pedestrian safety, improved
transit access, affordable fares, safe biking and
walking infrastructure, and enhanced pavement
quality. It includes strategies to improve safety on
high-injury networks, work on speed limit setting
and safe multimodal travel, and enhance safety at
At-Grade Rail Crossings. It also provided resources
and recommendations for local jurisdictions to use.

This plan will help guide the safety improvements
and strategies recommended in the City’s VZAP to
promote consistency.

ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN | (2020)
The Alameda Countywide Multimodal Arterial
Plan aims to address the needs and mobility for
all modes through complete streets concepts.

Alameda County’s network of efficient, safe, and
accessible arterials supports multimodal travel,
fostering a strong economy, a healthy environment,
and vibrant communities while respecting local
contexts. The Plan provides a roadmap for a future
with superior mobility for all modes of continuous
and connected networks for each mode that better
supports adjacent land uses. The Plan will establish
a network of safe, efficient, and accessible arterials
that support multimodal transportation for all users.

The plan supports VZAP goals by enhancing safety,
accessibility, and multimodal connectivity along
arterial corridors, ensuring safe and more efficient
travel for all road users.

ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE MULTIMODAL
ARTERIAL PLAN | (2016)
EXHIBIT A Page 48 of 288
296
30 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Alameda County Transportation Commission’s
2024 Comprehensive Investment Plan aligns with
VZAP goals by emphasizing safety and multimodal
accessibility. Projects like Complete Streets, Safe
Routes to School, and corridor enhancements
prioritize reducing collisions, improving infrastructure for vulnerable users, and creating safe environments
for all modes of transportation. The Comprehensive
Investment Plan strategically allocates funding from
diverse sources to ensure equitable and sustainable
improvements across Alameda County. These
efforts align with VZAP’s mission to eliminate traffic
fatalities and severe injuries while fostering safe,
healthy, and equitable mobility.

ALAMEDA COMPREHENSIVE INVESTMENT
PLAN | (2024)
This Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) aims to provide
an understanding of Livermore Amador Valley
Transit Authority (LAVTA)’s existing conditions,
discuss standards achieved, evaluate performance
metrics, provide recommendations, and plan for
operational sustainability over the next 10 years.

LAVTA recently updated the bus system routes
after the adoption of this plan. The plan provides
equal access to safe, affordable, and reliable public
transportation options, increasing mobility and
improving the quality of life for those who live and
work in the Tri-Valley area. The plan aligns with the
VZAP goals by enhancing public transit accessibility
and safety through improved service design, transit
stop upgrades, and strategies to reduce conflicts
between transit vehicles and other road users.

LAVTA SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN (SRTP)
FY 2016 - 2025 | (2016)
EXHIBIT A Page 49 of 288
297
Vision Zero Action Plan 31
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
The Isabel Neighborhood Specific Plan establishes
a new regulatory framework to guide private and
public development in the Isabel Neighborhood over
the next 20 years. The Plan’s regulatory framework
replaces the General Plan’s land use designations
and the Livermore Development Code’s zoning
regulations. The plan will guide future development
of the area surrounding the Isabel Valley Link Station
in the I-580 median at Isabel Avenue. The plan is a
“Specific Plan,” an effective tool used by the City of
Livermore to meet community goals and guide the
transformation of several areas within the city. In the Isabel Neighborhood, the abundance of vacant land
near the proposed Valley Link station is a significant
opportunity to shape a new neighborhood for the
city, centered on a central transit hub. The plan
aligns with the VZAP’s goals by incorporating
pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, traffic-calming
measures, and multimodal connectivity to create a
safe, more accessible environment for all users.

ISABEL NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIFIC PLAN |
(2022)
EXHIBIT A Page 50 of 288
298
32 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

PEOPLE AT THE CENTER
This chapter summarizes the community and stakeholder engagement efforts undertaken to support the development of the City of Livermore’s VZAP. A transparent, inclusive, and collaborative outreach program was implemented to promote aligning the plan with local priorities, lived travel experiences, and safety concerns across all modes, including walking, bicycling, driving, and transit.

The engagement program incorporated a range of outreach methods, including community meetings, stakeholder coordination, an interactive project website, a map-based input tool, and an online survey. These efforts provided both qualitative insights and location-specific feedback on perceived safety issues, high-risk corridors and intersections, and community-supported solutions. The input also helped validate and supplement trends identified through collision data analysis.

Collaboration with City departments, regional agencies, transportation providers, community organizations, and residents promote the inclusion of diverse perspectives and technical expertise in the plan. The results of this engagement process directly shaped the identification of priority safety needs, the development of strategies, and the selection of projects and programs included in the VZAP, establishing a strong, community-supported foundation for reducing traffic fatalities and severe injuries in Livermore.

The City established the foundation for its Vision Zero efforts through two primary sources: community feedback and collision data analysis. Community and stakeholder feedback gathered through public meetings, workshops, surveys, and interactive mapping tools, combined with a review of historical collision patterns in Livermore, has informed the development of targeted, data-driven strategies that address both community-identified concerns and documented safety risks.

The City affirms that fatal and severe injury collisions are unacceptable and preventable. This principle serves as the guiding policy framework for the VZAP and underscores the City’s commitment to implementing systemic, coordinated actions to improve roadway safety for all users.

IDENTIFICATION OF

HIGH-RISK NETWORK

DEVELOP SAFETY

COUNTER MEASURES

INTEGRATE PLAN
&PRIORITIZE

IMPROVEMENTS

ACTION PLAN VISION ZERO
REPORT
CITY

COUNCIL

DATA COLLECTION
(5 YEARS - 2020-2024)

COLLISION TREND

ANALYSIS

ONLY FATAL AND SEVERE

INJURY COLLISIONS

BASED ON THE HUGHEST

NUMBER OF FATAL AND

SEVERE INJURY COLLISIONS

FEBRUARY
25 & 26 , 2026 TH TH

DECEMBER
15 , 2025 TH

JANUARY
28 , 2026 TH

STAKEHOLDER INPUT
/

COMMUNITY INPUT

STAKEHOLDER INPUT
/

COMMUNITY INPUT

STAKEHOLDER INPUT
/

COMMUNITY INPUT PROJECT TIMELINE
EXHIBIT A Page 51 of 288
299
Vision Zero Action Plan 33
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 52 of 288
300
34 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APPROACH
The City of Livermore is committed to reducing traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries through the development and implementation of its VZAP. This plan establishes a data-driven and community-informed framework to improve safety for all roadway users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists. Public engagement played a central role in shaping the VZAP, ensuring that it reflects the community’s priorities, lived experiences, and safety concerns.

To support this effort, the City implemented an inclusive and multi-faceted engagement process to gather input from residents, stakeholders, and agency partners. Feedback was collected on high-risk locations, safety concerns, and opportunities for improvement, helping to ground the plan in local needs and reinforce the City’s commitment to creating safe, more accessible streets.

The planning process began in September 2025 and included ongoing coordination with City staff, stakeholders, and partner agencies. Regular meetings were conducted to review data findings, discuss safety priorities, and refine strategies and countermeasures. These meetings were open to the public to promote transparency and encourage participation. Additional outreach was conducted through digital tools, social media, and community events to broaden engagement and reach a diverse audience.

Community input identified key concerns related to traffic safety, multimodal access, and connectivity throughout Livermore. Residents and stakeholders highlighted locations where they would like to see safety enhancement for walking, biking, or driving. These insights complemented technical analyses, including collision data review and field observations, ensuring that recommended strategies and projects address both documented safety risks and real-world travel experiences.

As part of the engagement process, the City conducted three rounds of stakeholder and community outreach meetings on December 15, 2025, January 28, 2026, and February 25, 2026.

EXHIBIT A Page 53 of 288
301
Vision Zero Action Plan 35
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

ENGAGEMENT GOALS & OBJECTIVES
The City of Livermore established the following goals to guide its community engagement efforts for the VZAP:

Community Stakeholders
The engagement process included coordination with a broad range of City departments, regional agencies, and community organizations:

1. Raise awareness of the City’s commitment to improving roadway safety for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and motorists and communicate the purpose and goals of the VZAP.

2. Gather meaningful input from community members and stakeholders on traffic safety concerns, high-risk locations, and opportunities for improvement to inform projects, programs, and policies.

3. Promote inclusive participation by engaging a diverse range of community members, including youth, seniors, people with disabilities, transit users, and historically underserved populations.

4. Identify priority safety concerns and locations by incorporating local knowledge and lived experiences from residents, businesses, schools, and community organizations.

5. Foster partnerships with key stakeholders and partner agencies to support the development and implementation of safety strategies and projects.

6. Educate the community on Vision Zero principles, safe street design, and responsible road user behavior.

7. Maintain a transparent and collaborative process by clearly communicating how community input informs the Vision Zero Action Plan.

City of Livermore Departments
• City Manager’s Office
• Community Development (Planning, Engineering and Housing & Human Services) • Public Works (Streets, Sanitation)
• Police Department
• Fire Department
Regional and Community Partners
• Livermore Area Recreation and Park District
(LARPD)
• Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority
(LAVTA)
• Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District
(LVJUSD)
• Bike East Bay
• Sandia National Laboratories and Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory
• Livermore Downtown Inc.

EXHIBIT A Page 54 of 288
302
36 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOW WE ENGAGED THE COMMUNITY
The City of Livermore developed its VZAP using three primary inputs: stakeholder engagement, community feedback, and collision data analysis. Input gathered through meetings, workshops, online tools, and map-based platforms, combined with a review of historical collision data, helped shape a robust set of recommendations that address both documented safety issues and community-identified concerns.

Community feedback provided valuable insight into lived experiences, high-risk locations, and desired safety improvements. This input not only validated the technical safety analysis but also identified additional concerns not captured through collision data alone.

To promote broad and inclusive participation, the City implemented a comprehensive outreach strategy that included the following:

Outreach Methods
Public and Stakeholder Notifications: The City
distributed e-notifications to inform residents and
stakeholders about opportunities to participate in
the VZAP process.

Media Releases: Information was shared with local
media outlets to raise awareness and encourage
community participation.

Newsletters and Mass Emails: Project updates
were included in City newsletters and distributed to
subscribers.

Posters, Kiosks, and Advertisements: A-frame
posters and kiosks, particularly in Downtown Livermore, were used to promote meetings and engagement opportunities.

Project Website: A dedicated website provided information on the VZAP, including collision data, engagement opportunities, and project updates. The site also featured an interactive mapping tool for location-specific feedback.

School District Mass Emails: Project updates and safety information were distributed through school district email communications to students, parents, and staff.

Word-of-Mouth Promotion: City staff and stakeholders supported outreach through community events and informal communication channels.

EXHIBIT A Page 55 of 288
303
Vision Zero Action Plan 37
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Engagement Activities
Community Meetings and Workshops: Residents,
business owners, and community groups participated in meetings to share safety concerns and identify priorities. Materials were available in Spanish upon request to support inclusive participation.

VZAP Stakeholder Group: An interdisciplinary
group, including City staff, transportation professionals, law enforcement, advocates, and residents, provided ongoing input throughout the planning
process.

Interactive Map-Based Input Platform: Hosted
on the project website, this tool allowed users to
identify specific safety concerns and locations. It
provided an accessible option for those unable to
attend in-person events and generated valuable,
location-specific feedback.

School Outreach: Engagement with schools, including administrators, students, and staff, helped identify issues such as speeding near school zones,
limited visibility, and pick-up/drop-off challenges.

EXHIBIT A Page 56 of 288
304
38 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

PROJECT WEBSITE AND MAP INPUT PLATFORM
As a key component of the engagement process, the City of Livermore launched a dedicated project website to support the development of the VZAP and collect transportation safety input from the community.

The website served as a central hub for project information, including updates, background materials, collision data, and interactive engagement tools.

A primary feature of the website was an interactive map-based input platform (Maptionnaire), which allowed community members to identify specific locations of concern by placing points or drawing lines within the City.

Participants could also provide detailed descriptions of safety issues, enabling the collection of both spatial and qualitative feedback.
• Engagement Period:

October 2025 – February 2026
• Website URL:

Livermore Vision Zero
• Platform Features:
• Overview of the VZAP and planning process
• Project Area Map
• Historical collision data (2020 - 2024)
• Instructions for submitting input through the mapping platform The platform was widely promoted through email notifications, social media, and community meetings to encourage broad participation.

EXHIBIT A Page 57 of 288
305
Vision Zero Action Plan 39
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

LIVERMORE VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN PROJECT WEBSITE
EXHIBIT A Page 58 of 288
306
40 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

TRAFFIC CONCERNS FEEDBACK (ONLINE PLATFORM)
Community members and stakeholders provided valuable input on locations and conditions where safety concerns exist, including areas where collisions may be underreported or have not yet occurred but present a heightened risk. Many participants identified “near-miss” incidents and locations that could be enhanced for walking, bicycling, or driving, reflecting an informed perception of risk based on daily travel experiences.

This feedback highlights areas where safety issues may not yet be fully captured in collision data but warrant proactive attention. Rather than representing general concern, these comments indicate specific, experience-based insights into locations with potential safety deficiencies.

A total of 626 comments from 410 unique commenters were submitted through the project website. The majority of comments were concentrated along key corridors, including:
• East Avenue
• Livermore Avenue
• First Street
• Portola Avenue
• Vasco Road
• Murrieta Boulevard
The most frequently reported concerns were pedestrian safety and speeding, consistent with trends identified in the collision analysis.

The results of the interactive map are illustrated in the figure below, where each point and line represents a location-specific comment submitted by a community member. A complete compilation of community input and with the online Maptionnaire survey is provided in Appendix B.

INTERACTIVE MAP COMMENT REPONSES
Screenshots of the interactive map input platform, representing dots and lines with comments provided by community members.

EXHIBIT A Page 59 of 288
307
Vision Zero Action Plan 41
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 60 of 288
308
42 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC CONCERNS RECEIVED FROM THE COMMUNITY The community engagement effort yielded a total of 626 traffic-related concerns from 410 unique commenters through the interactive map platform between September 2025 and February 2026. Of these, 381 concerns (61 percent) were point-specific, typically located at intersections, while 245 concerns (39 percent) were line-based, representing issues along roadway corridors.

In terms of topic, 37 percent of concerns were related to motor vehicle traffic, while an equal 37 percent focused on pedestrian safety. Bicycle-related concerns accounted for the remaining 26 percent of input.

Note: This analysis is based on all 626 traffic-related concerns to provide a comprehensive summary of community feedback.

EXHIBIT A Page 61 of 288
309
Vision Zero Action Plan 43
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
LOCATION TYPE: MODE FACING ISSUES
The graph illustrates the distribution of traffic safety concerns by travel mode, bicyclists, motorists, and pedestrians, across roadway segments and intersections. Bicycle-related concerns are most prevalent along roadway segments, accounting for 44 percent of reported issues, compared to 14 percent at intersections.

In contrast, concerns related to motor vehicles and pedestrians are more concentrated at intersections, representing 42 percent and 44 percent, respectively, compared to 30 percent and 25 percent along roadway segments.

Overall, the results indicate that roadway conditions present greater safety challenges for bicyclists, while intersections are the primary areas of concern for motorists and pedestrians.

EXHIBIT A Page 62 of 288
310
44 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

TRAFFIC SAFETY CONCERNS
Community-reported traffic safety concerns in Livermore highlight a broad range of issues affecting all roadway users. Pedestrian safety was the most frequently identified concern, accounting for 17 percent of responses, followed closely by speeding (16 percent) and traffic sign and signal violations (13 percent).

Other notable concerns included limited visibility (11 percent), intersection safety (nine percent), and bicycle safety (8 percent), indicating strong community interest in improving multimodal safety and addressing intersection-related challenges.

Additional intersections identified by residents include Portola Avenue & Lee Avenue, Livermore Avenue & 7th Street, East Avenue & Estates Street, First Street & Railroad Avenue, First Street & Mines Road, East Avenue & Madison Avenue, First Street & Scott Street, Vasco Road & Preston Avenue, and Murrieta Boulevard & Holmes Street, each accounting for approximately 5 percent of responses.

Overall, these findings reflect a combination of infrastructure, operational, and behavioral factors influencing roadway safety in Livermore and underscore the community’s priority to enhance safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists alike, as illustrated in the accompanying figure.

EXHIBIT A Page 63 of 288
311
Vision Zero Action Plan 45
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON CITY STREETS
The graph highlights the roadways in the City of Livermore that community members most frequently identified as locations of traffic safety concerns. East Avenue received the highest share of comments, accounting for 18 percent of the reported concerns, followed closely by Livermore Avenue at 17 percent.

First Street was the next-most-frequently mentioned roadway, accounting for 11 percent of the concerns.

Several other corridors were also noted by residents, including Portola Avenue and Vasco Road (each seven percent), as well as Murrieta Boulevard and Fourth Street (each six percent). Additional locations, such as Concannon Boulevard and Vallecitos Road, accounted for five percent each, while Las Positas Road and College Avenue were identified in four percent of responses. Smaller shares of comments referenced Mines Road and Isabel Avenue (three percent each), and Jack London Boulevard and Holmes Street (two percent each).

Overall, these responses highlight several key corridors where residents perceive safety challenges, helping the City prioritize locations for further evaluation and potential safety improvements as part of the VZAP.

EXHIBIT A Page 64 of 288
312
46 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON INTERSECTIONS
The graph highlights the intersections in Livermore most frequently identified by community members as locations with traffic safety concerns. East Avenue & Jensen Street received the highest share of comments (13 percent), followed by Livermore Avenue & Second Street (12 percent).

Other commonly noted intersections include East Avenue & Mines Road and Livermore Avenue & First Street (each 8 percent), as well as College Avenue & Tokay Common and Livermore Avenue & College Avenue (each 7 percent).

Additional intersections identified by residents include Portola Avenue & Lee Avenue, Livermore Avenue & 7th Street, and East Avenue & Estates Street (each 6 percent). Intersections such as First Street & Railroad Avenue, First Street & Mines Road, East Avenue & Madison Avenue, First Street & Scott Street, Vasco Road & Preston Avenue, and Murrieta Boulevard & Holmes Street each accounted for approximately 5 percent of responses.

Overall, these findings identify a set of priority intersections where safety concerns are most concentrated, providing a strong basis for targeted analysis and future improvements as part of the VZAP.

EXHIBIT A Page 65 of 288
313
Vision Zero Action Plan 47
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

WORKSHOPS AT HIGH SCHOOL

As part of the City of Livermore’s VZAP engagement efforts, a youth-focused workshop was conducted at a local high school to engage students who are new or future drivers. The workshop reached approximately 50–60 students across two classroom sessions and supported the City’s Safe System approach by promoting early awareness of roadway safety, shared responsibility, and human-centered transportation design.

The workshop began with a structured presentation introducing Vision Zero principles, the Safe System approach, and the City’s High Injury Network (HIN). The presentation highlighted high-risk corridors and key contributing factors to severe and fatal collisions, emphasizing that traffic deaths and serious injuries are preventable and that transportation systems should be designed to anticipate human error and reduce crash severity. Proven safety countermeasures, consistent with federal guidance, were also introduced.

Following the presentation, students participated in a hands-on group exercise focused on evaluating priority High Injury Network (HIN) corridors, including Vasco Road, First Street, and Airway Boulevard, and developing context-sensitive safety improvements. Students applied a multidisciplinary approach, considering engineering, enforcement, education, and policy strategies, as well as multimodal access for vulnerable road users.

Students demonstrated strong engagement and developed thoughtful recommendations, including roadway reconfiguration, signal timing modifications, speed management strategies, and improvements to transit access and connectivity. A City Senior Transportation Engineer provided technical guidance, reinforcing real-world applications and introducing students to potential career pathways in transportation safety.

Overall, the workshop advanced key engagement objectives by increasing safety awareness, encouraging data-informed problem-solving, and incorporating youth perspectives into the planning process. This effort underscores the value of early and inclusive engagement in building a culture of safety and supports the City’s goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and serious injuries through a comprehensive, community-informed approach.

EXHIBIT A Page 66 of 288
314
48 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

DATA-DRIVEN PROCESS
The Livermore VZAP is built on a rigorous, data-informed methodology that guides how safety challenges are identified, understood, and addressed. This approach promotes recommendations that are objective, transparent, and focused on achieving the City’s goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries.

Rather than reacting only after collisions occur, Livermore’s process emphasizes proactive identification of risk and early intervention.

At the core of this effort is the recognition that human error is inevitable. The role of the transportation system, therefore, is to reduce the likelihood of mistakes and minimize the severity of outcomes when they do occur. Data plays a critical role in this process by revealing patterns that are not always visible through observation alone, highlighting where systemic risks exist and where safety improvements can have the greatest impact.

While quantitative analysis is essential, it is complemented by community insight. The experiences of residents, students, workers, and visitors provide valuable context that helps explain how and why safety concerns arise in specific locations. This combined approach promotes reflecting both measurable trends and lived experiences across Livermore in the plan.

To support this effort, the City analyzed a comprehensive five-year collision dataset (2020 - 2024) obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). This dataset was supplemented with roadway characteristics and demographic information to better understand how safety outcomes vary across the city. Together, these data sources provide a strong foundation for identifying systemic risks, prioritizing investments, and developing targeted solutions. Collision data is provided in the Appendix C.

EXHIBIT A Page 67 of 288
315
Vision Zero Action Plan 49
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
1 COLLISION TRENDS AND PATTERNS
Collision data is evaluated to understand when,
where, and why crashes occur, as well as who is
most affected.
• Severity Analysis: Classification of collisions by
severity, with emphasis on fatal and severe injury
collisions.
• Temporal Trends: Evaluation of changes in collision patterns over time, including year-to-year variation.
• Road User Analysis: Assessment of impacts
across different users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists. • Collision Characteristics: Examination of contributing factors such as collision type, primary violation, lighting conditions, and roadway context. • Demographic Insights: Review of age and
gender patterns to better understand vulnerable
populations.
2 HIGH-INJURY NETWORK IDENTIFICATION
A High-Injury Network (HIN) is developed to focus
resources where they are most needed.
• High-Injury Corridors: Roadways with a concentration of fatal and severe injury collisions. • High-Injury Intersections: Specific locations with
recurring severe crash patterns requiring targeted intervention. 3 COLLISION PROFILE DEVELOPMENT
Collision data is synthesized to identify recurring
crash patterns (e.g., roadway departure, intersection conflicts, speed-related crashes). These profiles help link safety issues to underlying causes and guide the selection of appropriate solutions.
4 COUNTERMEASURE TOOLBOX
A toolbox of proven safety strategies is assembled
based on national best practices and tailored to Livermore’s context. Each countermeasure is aligned with specific collision profiles to promote targeted
and effective solutions.
5 PRIORITY PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
Priority improvement locations are identified based
on collision frequency, severity, and concentration
within the High-Injury Network. These locations are
further refined through community input and field
review to promote recommendations that are both
data-driven and context-sensitive.

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK
The data-driven process includes the following key components:

EXHIBIT A Page 68 of 288
316
50 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

COLLISION ANALYSIS
A detailed evaluation of collision data provides critical insight into the safety challenges facing Livermore’s roadway network and helps identify where targeted improvements can have the greatest impact. This analysis focuses on injury collisions occurring on City-maintained streets between 2020 and 2024, excluding state facilities such as I-580 and State Route 84.

During this five-year period, a total of 833 injury collisions were recorded. Of these, 57 collisions (Seven percent) resulted in fatal or severe injuries, referred to as killed or severely injured (KSI) collisions. While these events represent a relatively small share of total crashes, they account for the most devastating outcomes, including 11 fatalities (where 14 people lost their lives) and 46 severe injuries (where 67 individual sustained injuries), and are therefore the primary focus of the VZAP.

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY

KSI COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
EXHIBIT A Page 69 of 288
317
Vision Zero Action Plan 51
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 70 of 288
318
52 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E L CA
WA

OLIVINA A
E JACK

LONDON BL

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E

VALLECITO

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E

AI RWAY BL
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
The map illustrates the injury collisions
that occurred in the City of Livermore between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024.

EXHIBIT A Page 71 of 288
319
Vision Zero Action Plan 53
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 72 of 288
320
54 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E L CA
WA

OLIVINA A
E JACK

LONDON BL

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E

VALLECITO

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E

AI RWAY BL
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
The map illustrates the KSI collisions that
occurred in City of Livermore between
January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024
EXHIBIT A Page 73 of 288
321
Vision Zero Action Plan 55
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

A MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 74 of 288
322
56 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

OVERALL TRENDS
Collision patterns over time reveal important trends. KSI collisions have remained relatively consistent year to year, indicating persistent systemic risks within the roadway network. In contrast, overall injury collisions have increased steadily, from 122 in 2020 to 195 in 2024, suggesting a growing need for proactive safety interventions as travel demand and activity levels rise across the City.

EXHIBIT A Page 75 of 288
323
Vision Zero Action Plan 57
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

WHO IS MOST AFFECTED
The distribution of collisions by travel mode highlights the disproportionate risk faced by vulnerable road users. While passenger vehicles are involved in
the majority of crashes, collisions involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists are significantly more likely to result in severe or fatal outcomes.
• Pedestrians account for a notable share of KSI collisions despite representing a smaller portion of total collisions.
• Bicyclists and motorcyclists similarly experience
higher injury severity when involved in collisions.

These findings reinforce the need to prioritize safety improvements for people walking and bicycling, particularly along busy corridors and at intersections.

EXHIBIT A Page 76 of 288
324
58 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Ø
Ø

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E L CA

WALL ST

OLIVINA AV
E JACK

LONDON BL

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
CA
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E

VALLECITOS

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E

AI RWAY BL
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
The map illustrates the pedestrian KSI collisions that occurred in City of Livermore between January 1, 2020, and December
31, 2024.

EXHIBIT A Page 77 of 288
325
Vision Zero Action Plan 59
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

A MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
V

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

ATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
OS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Ø Fatal
Ø Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 78 of 288
326
60 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL

ISABEL A
V
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E
OLIVIN
E JACK

LONDON BL

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E
VALLE

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E

AI RWAY BL
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
The map illustrates the bicycle KSI collisions that occurred in City of Livermore between January 1, 2020, and December
31, 2024.

EXHIBIT A Page 79 of 288
327
Vision Zero Action Plan 61
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
NA AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

LECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 80 of 288
328
62 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

WHERE COLLISIONS OCCUR
Spatial analysis shows that intersections are a critical area of concern, accounting for approximately three-quarters of all KSI collisions.

This pattern reflects the complexity of intersection environments, where multiple conflict points, turning movements, and visibility constraints increase the likelihood of severe crashes. In addition, a significant number of severe collisions occur near schools, underscoring the importance of Safe Routes to School improvements and speed management in these areas.

KSI COLLISIONS BY LOCATION
75%
Collisions occurred at intersections
25%
Collisions occurred at along roadways
EXHIBIT A Page 81 of 288
329
Vision Zero Action Plan 63
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

KEY COLLISION CHARACTERISTICS
Further analysis of KSI collisions reveals several recurring patterns:
• Collision Types: Broadside (angle) crashes are the most common severe collision type, followed by vehicle–pedestrian incidents and collisions with fixed objects. • Contributing Factors: Driving under the influence
and speeding are among the leading factors associated with severe crashes, along with right-ofway violations and improper turning movements.

Together, these patterns highlight the combined influence of roadway design, speed, behavior, and visibility in contributing to severe outcomes.
• Lighting Conditions: While many severe collisions occur during daylight hours, a notable share occurs under low-light conditions, indicating the importance of visibility enhancements. • Age Trends: Drivers between the ages of 20
and 39 are most frequently identified as being
at fault in KSI collisions, suggesting an opportunity for targeted education and enforcement strategies.

KSI COLLISIONS BY COLLISION TYPE
EXHIBIT A Page 82 of 288
330
64 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 83 of 288
331
Vision Zero Action Plan 65
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 84 of 288
332
66 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL

ISABEL A
V
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
OLI
E JACK

LONDON B
ALDEN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
VA

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E

AI RWAY
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYAR

KSI COLLISIONS NEARBY QUARTER

MILE OF SCHOOLS
A total of 28 KSI collisions, including six fatal
and 22 severe injury collisions, occurred
within a quarter mile of schools. Among
these, passenger cars or pickup trucks
were involved in 13 collisions, followed by
pedestrians (six collisions), bicycles (five
collisions), and motorcycles (four collisions).

The most common violation categories
were DUI (six collisions) and unsafe speed
(five collisions), while the predominant crash
type was broadside, accounting for 10
collisions. The 20–29 age group, identified
as the most frequently at fault, accounted
for seven KSI collisions, reflecting a higher
crash involvement and risk among younger
drivers. Additionally, 17 collisions occurred
during daylight hours, highlighting that the
most severe collisions near schools tend to
happen under clear visibility conditions.

The map illustrates the KSI collisions that occurred within a quarter mile of schools in the City of Livermore between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2024.

EXHIBIT A Page 85 of 288
333
Vision Zero Action Plan 67
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
BR
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

VINA AV
BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST
LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
RD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
Schools
Schools Quarter miles Buffer
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 86 of 288
334
68 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HIGH INJURY NETWORK
To maximize safety benefits and align with the principles of the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program, the City of Livermore identified a High-Injury Network (HIN), a subset of corridors that account for a disproportionate share of fatal and serious injury crashes. This targeted approach promotes directing safety investments to locations with the highest potential to reduce roadway fatalities and serious injuries.

The HIN was developed using a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of collision data, with an emphasis on crash frequency, severity, and spatial concentration. Fatal and serious injury crashes were weighted more heavily in the analysis to prioritize locations where interventions can have the greatest life-saving impact. This methodology is consistent with the Safe System Approach and supports the City’s goal of eliminating roadway fatalities and serious injuries.

In addition to identifying priority corridors, the analysis incorporates key risk factors to further refine high-priority segments. These factors include:
• The presence and concentration of fatal and serious injury collisions • Collision occurrence at intersections
• Involvement of vulnerable road users, including pedestrians and bicyclists By integrating these criteria, the HIN reflects both systemic risk patterns and location-specific safety challenges, supporting the development of targeted and effective countermeasures.

The identified corridors represent priority investment areas where evidence-based safety strategies, such as speed management, intersection improvements, and multimodal infrastructure enhancements, can be implemented to reduce crash severity and improve overall roadway safety. This approach enables the City to advance a portfolio of projects that are data-driven, cost-effective, and aligned with SS4A funding priorities.

Establishing HIN provides a clear framework for prioritizing safety investments and advancing implementation. It promotes the strategic allocation of limited resources to projects with the greatest potential to reduce fatalities and serious injuries, while supporting measurable progress toward Livermore’s Vision Zero goal.

Between 2020 and 2024, the 13 high-injury corridors identified through this process accounted for seven fatalities and 30 severe injury collisions. The table below summarizes these priority corridors.

EXHIBIT A Page 87 of 288
335
Vision Zero Action Plan 69
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Rank Corridors Fatal
Severe
Injury
KSI
Collisions
Intersection
KSI Collisions
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
Bicycle
KSI Collisions
A
Vasco Rd: Scenic Ave
to W Gate Dr
1 5 6 5 1 0
B First St: I-580 to P St 2 3 5 3 1 1
C Airway Blvd: Sutter
Street to Kitty Hawk Rd
1 2 3 1 1 0
D
East Ave: N Mines Road
to S Vasco Rd
1 2 3 3 1 1
E
Jack London Blvd:

Discovery Dr to
Murrieta Blvd
0 3 3 2 1 1
F
Murrieta Blvd: Olivina
Ave to Holmes St
0 3 3 0 0 0
G
Fourth St: S Q Street to
S K St
1 1 2 2 1 0
H
Las Positas Rd: Bennett
Dr to S Vasco Rd
1 1 2 1 0 0
I
Livermore Ave: North
City Limits to Railroad
Ave
0 2 2 2 0 0
J
N Canyons Pkwy:

West City Limits to
Independence Dr
0 2 2 2 0 0
K
Railroad Ave: First St to
N L St
0 2 2 2 0 0
L
Southfront Rd: Franklin
Lane to Commerce Wy
0 2 2 1 1 0
M
Vallecitos Rd: West
City Limits to E
Vineyard Ave
0 2 2 1 0 1
EXHIBIT A Page 88 of 288
336
70 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
W JACK

LONDON BL
HAG
E
MAN
N
DR
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N
E
E
VALLEC
R
OLIVIN

ALDEN LN
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL
E

AI RWAY

KITTY HAWK
BL
RD
DOOLAN
RD

E VINEYARD AV
M
C
E
J
The map illustrates the 13 corridors on
the high-injury network based on KSI
collisions in the City of Livermore.

Rank Corridors

A VASCO RD

B FIRST ST

C AIRWAY BLVD

D EAST AVE

E JACK LONDON BLVD

F MURRIETA BLVD

G FOURTH ST

H LAS POSITAS RD

I LIVERMORE AVE

J N CANYONS PKWY

K RAILROAD AVE

L SOUTHFRONT RD

M VALLECITOS RD
EXHIBIT A Page 89 of 288
337
Vision Zero Action Plan 71
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

FIRST ST

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

N VASCO RD

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N

MURRIETA
BL

SCENIC AV

RAILROAD AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST
ECITOS
RD

NORT HFRONT RD
NA AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

VANCOUVER
WY

SOUTHFRONT RD

N MINES RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
AV
K
B
B G
I
F
A
M D
L
H 580
580
RANK Corridors

A VASCO RD

B FIRST ST

C AIRWAY BL

D EAST AV

E JACK LONDON BLVD

F MURRIETA BLVD

G FOURTH ST

H LAS POSITAS RD

I LIVERMORE AVE

J N CANYONS PKWY

K RAILROAD AV

L SOUTHFRONT RD

M VALLECITOS RD
HIN Corridors
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 90 of 288
338
72 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

ALIGNING THE HIGH INJURY NETWORK WITH THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT APPROACH Consistent with the SS4A framework, the City of Livermore integrates technical analysis with robust community engagement to promote safety priorities that reflect both data-driven findings and lived experiences. By aligning the HIN with input from residents, stakeholders, and community partners, the City strengthens its ability to identify safety concerns, validate high-risk locations, and develop context-sensitive solutions.

This combined approach enhances transparency and builds public trust, while ensuring that safety investments are responsive to community needs. It also supports the development of targeted education and outreach strategies that reinforce safe behaviors and complement engineering improvements.

Community feedback collected throughout the planning process closely aligns with the collision data analysis. Notably, approximately 75 percent of fatal and severe injury collisions occur at intersections, a finding that was consistently echoed in public input. Corridors such as Vasco Road and First Street were frequently identified by community members as areas of concern, consistent with their designation on the High-Injury Network.

Feedback also highlighted key safety concerns across different travel modes. Motor vehicle-related issues were most frequently cited, followed by concerns related to pedestrian and bicycle safety. Community members specifically identified intersections such as East Avenue at Jensen Street and Livermore Avenue at Second Street, as well as corridors including East Avenue and Livermore Avenue, as locations with recurring safety challenges. These locations correspond directly with areas identified through the HIN analysis based on 2020 - 2024 collision data.

The strong alignment between community-identified concerns and data-driven findings reinforces the validity of the City’s analytical approach and underscores the need for targeted, location-specific interventions. By integrating community insight with technical analysis, the City is better positioned to advance effective, equitable, and implementable safety improvements that reduce traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries.

EXHIBIT A Page 91 of 288
339
Vision Zero Action Plan 73
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 92 of 288
340
74 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

COUNTERMEASURES TOOLBOX &

COLLISION PROFILES
The City identified 12 priority collision profiles that highlight recurring patterns in collisions resulting in fatalities and severe injuries (KSI). These profiles were developed through a comprehensive analysis of collision data and associated roadway conditions. Each profile represents a critical safety concern and reflects common characteristics such as pedestrian involvement, nighttime conditions, impaired driving, or intersection-related conflicts. It is important to note that individual collisions may fall into multiple profiles (e.g., a nighttime collision involving impaired driving at an intersection).

EXHIBIT A Page 93 of 288
341
Vision Zero Action Plan 75
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
To address these safety challenges, the City developed a comprehensive Countermeasures Toolbox consisting of engineering, education, and enforcement strategies. The toolbox includes a wide range of treatments related to:

This toolbox is designed to support context-sensitive decision-making, recognizing that not all countermeasures are appropriate for every location. Each collision profile is paired with a targeted set of countermeasures, allowing the City to implement solutions that directly address specific safety risks.

Evaluation Framework
Each countermeasure was evaluated based on the following criteria:

All countermeasures should be applied on a case-by-case basis, considering local factors such as roadway context, surrounding land uses, terrain, and environmental conditions. Additional information on evaluation framework is provided in the Appendix D.

Data Sources & Methodology
The Federal Highway Complexity (Cx): Administration (FHWA) Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse served as the primary reference for identifying applicable countermeasures, associated collision types, and corresponding Crash Reduction Factors (CRFs). Additional published research and industry guidance were reviewed to supplement CMF data and provide a more comprehensive understanding of countermeasure effectiveness.

When selecting countermeasures, practitioners should consider the availability, applicability, and reliability of CMF data.
• Roadway design and geometric improvements
• Pedestrian and bicyclist safety enhancements
• Traffic operations and signal timing
• Speed management strategies
• Signage and pavement markings
• Public education and awareness programs
Efficacy
The expected safety benefit based on research and
industry best practices
Cost
The relative cost associated with design, implementation, and maintenance Complexity
The level of effort, coordination, and time required
for implementation
EXHIBIT A Page 94 of 288
342
76 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Countermeasure Table Components
The countermeasure tables included in this plan provide the following information:

Application of the Toolbox
The following section presents the 12 collision profiles, each accompanied by the most relevant and effective countermeasures. Together, these strategies form a practical, data-driven toolbox that enables the City to implement targeted safety improvements addressing its unique roadway safety challenges.

Detailed countermeasure tables are provided in Appendix D.

Collision Types
Categories such as All,
Ped-Bike (pedestrian and
bicycle), Night, or Emergency Vehicle
Crash Reduction
Factor (CRF):

Estimated percentage reduction in collisions following implementations Expeced Life:

Anticipated service life
before major maintenance
or replacement
EXHIBIT A Page 95 of 288
343
Vision Zero Action Plan 77
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

LIST OF COLLISION PROFILES
The identified collision profiles capture a range of contributing factors, including behavioral risks (e.g., speeding, impaired driving), environmental conditions (e.g., nighttime), and location-specific characteristics (e.g., intersections, corridors, school zones). As noted, individual collisions may align with multiple profiles.

Each profile includes a summary of key trends and up to 12 prioritized countermeasures, with additional strategies provided in the Technical Appendix D.

Profile 1:

Address collision near
the school zone
Profile 2:

Address collisions between age group 20-39
Profile 3:

Address collisions that
occurred at non-signalized
intersections
Profile 4:

Reduce collisions on
25mph streets
Profile 7:

Reduce broadside
collisions
Profile 8:

Address motorcycle
collisions
Profile 9:

Address pedestrian collisions
Profile 10:

Address driving under the
influence (DUI)
Profile 5:

Address collision occurred
at signalized intersections
Profile 6:

Reduce nighttime
collisions
Profile 11:

Reduce speeding
Profile 12:

Address bicycle collisions
EXHIBIT A Page 96 of 288
344
78 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 1: Address collision near the school zone
EXHIBIT A Page 97 of 288
345
Vision Zero Action Plan 79
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
Schools
Schools Quarter miles Buffer
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
Schools
Schools Quarter miles Buffer
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 98 of 288
346
80 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LOND
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 2: Address collisions between age group 20-39
EXHIBIT A Page 99 of 288
347
Vision Zero Action Plan 81
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

I RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 100 of 288
348
82 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LOND
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 3: Address collisions that occurred at non-signalized intersections EXHIBIT A Page 101 of 288
349
Vision Zero Action Plan 83
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

I RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 102 of 288
350
84 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 4: Reduce collisions on 25mph streets
EXHIBIT A Page 103 of 288
351
Vision Zero Action Plan 85
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 104 of 288
352
86 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
ALD
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI RW
DOOLAN
RD
E VINE
Profile 5: Address collision occurred at signalized intersections EXHIBIT A Page 105 of 288
353
Vision Zero Action Plan 87
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
CK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST
DEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 106 of 288
354
88 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 6: Reduce nighttime collision
EXHIBIT A Page 107 of 288
355
Vision Zero Action Plan 89
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 108 of 288
356
90 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 7: Reduce broadside collision
EXHIBIT A Page 109 of 288
357
Vision Zero Action Plan 91
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 110 of 288
358
92 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 8: Address motorcycle collision
EXHIBIT A Page 111 of 288
359
Vision Zero Action Plan 93
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 112 of 288
360
94 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Ø
Ø

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LOND
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 9: Address pedestrian collision
EXHIBIT A Page 113 of 288
361
Vision Zero Action Plan 95
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Ø Fatal
Ø Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø
Ø

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Ø Fatal
Ø Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 114 of 288
362
96 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LOND
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 10: Address driving under the influence (DUI) collision EXHIBIT A Page 115 of 288
363
Vision Zero Action Plan 97
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 116 of 288
364
98 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LOND
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI R
DOOLAN
RD
E VIN
Profile 11: Reduce unsafe speed collision
EXHIBIT A Page 117 of 288
365
Vision Zero Action Plan 99
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
ACK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

LDEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD
E

I RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 118 of 288
366
100 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

AIRWAY BL
ISA
BEL A
V
E JA
LONDO
AL
NORT H

CANYONS PW
C
OLLIER
C
A
NYON
RD

E STANLEY BL

KITTY HAWK RD
W JACK

LONDON BL
E
AI RW
DOOLAN
RD
E VINE
Profile 12: Address bicycle collisions
EXHIBIT A Page 119 of 288
367
Vision Zero Action Plan 101
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
N
M
U
R
R
EI TA
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST
M
U
R
DE LL
L
N

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

E L CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

OLIVINA AV
CK
ON BL

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST
DEN LN

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
E

VALLECITOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

RWAY BL

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST

NEYARD AV
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

COLLEGE AV
B
R
O
A
D
M
O
O
R
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV
A
BL

SCENIC AV

PINE ST
JENSEN
ST

SPRIN GT OWN BL
N P ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL
RINCON
AV

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

CA MINITO

MADEIRA
WY

WALL ST
N L ST

RAILROAD AV

N LIVER
M
O
RE
A
V

ARLEN E WY

SECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD
AV

SUPERIOR
DR
A
MES
ST

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

CATALINA DR

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

VANCOUVER
WY
TOS RD

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR

WETMORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 120 of 288
368
102 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 121 of 288
369
Vision Zero Action Plan 103
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

RECOMMENDED SAFETY PROJECTS
The Safety Projects chapter outlines a comprehensive, data-driven strategy to eliminate traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries in the City of Livermore. Guided by the principles of the Vision Zero framework and the Safe System Approach, and informed by detailed collision analysis covering January 2020 through December 2024, the recommended projects translate identified safety challenges into targeted, implementable improvements.

The proposed countermeasures directly respond to documented collision trends identified in the City’s collision profile analysis, including broadside and rear-end collisions, vehicle–pedestrian conflicts, nighttime visibility challenges, operational issues at intersections, speeding, and conflicts among multiple roadway users. Notably, a significant share of fatal and severe injury collisions occur at intersections, reinforcing the need for corridor and intersection-focused safety strategies.

These recommendations are further shaped by input from stakeholders, community members, and partner agencies, ensuring that the proposed projects reflect local priorities, lived experiences, and community-identified safety concerns.

Consistent with the Vision Zero commitment to a Safe System, this chapter emphasizes a layered approach that integrates engineering, education, enforcement, and policy strategies. The recommended projects are designed to proactively reduce collision risk, manage speeds, improve visibility, and create safe conditions for all roadway users, particularly vulnerable populations such as pedestrians, bicyclists, children, and older adults.

To address the safety concerns effectively, the VZAP organizes recommended improvements into projects which include improvements on corridors, intersections, and citywide.

Together, these approaches provide a balanced framework that addresses both widespread risk factors across the transportation network and location-specific collision patterns along high-injury corridors and intersections. This strategy enables the City to strengthen overall network safety while prioritizing investments in areas where they will have the greatest impact. The projects identified in this plan are preliminary in nature and are intended to provide conceptual guidance; they will be subject to further engineering evaluation, feasibility review, community outreach and detailed design during future project development.

The projects recommended in this plan are:

Project 1: First Street-Holmes Street corridor safety improvements Project 2: Bike safety improvements and gap closure
Project 3: Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Improvements
Project 4: Improve signalized intersections with protected left turns Project 5: Citywide Street Light inventory and improvements Project 6: Citywide Sign improvements
EXHIBIT A Page 122 of 288
370
104 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
PROJECT 1

FIRST STREET-HOLMES STREET CORRIDOR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS This project focuses on implementing targeted safety improvements along the First Street–Holmes Street to reduce fatal and serious injury collisions and enhance multimodal safety for all roadway users.

First Street experienced seven KSI collisions and
136 total injury collisions, with common collision
types including broadside, rear-end, sideswipe, and
head-on crashes. In addition, 45 community-identified concerns highlight ongoing safety challenges along the corridor, reinforcing the need for targeted
safety improvements.

To address these issues, a comprehensive set of
corridor improvements is recommended, focusing
on enhancing visibility, reducing conflicts, and improving multimodal safety. Pedestrian-focused improvements include the installation of marked crosswalks, upgraded pavement markings and striping, enhanced signage, and Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacons (RRFBs) at key crossing locations.

Signal and intersection upgrades include signal
timing optimization, upgraded street lighting, retroreflective traffic signal backplates, countdown pedestrian signal heads, and Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) push buttons to improve accessibility and visibility. Additional enhancements include upgrades to video detection systems and improvements to bicycle infrastructure, including enhanced bicycle lanes and protected intersections at key
conflict points.

Speed management strategies are also incorporated, including the installation of speed feedback signs as part of the Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) design project (FY 2026/2027).

Together, these improvements are designed to address identified collision patterns, reduce conflict points, and improve overall safety and accessibility
for all users along this major arterial corridor.

First Street (Holmes Street to I-580) & Holmes Street (Wetmore Road to Murrieta Boulevard) Recommended Safety Improvements:
• Upgrade to retroreflective traffic signal head
backplates
• Signal head replace
• Video detection system upgrade
• Countdown pedestrian signal heads
• Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS) push buttons
• Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
• Setback stop lines all approaches
• Pavement markings
• Replace stop signs
• High-visibility crosswalk
• Install signage
• Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
• Crosswalk warning signs at intersections
• Yield pavement marking and sign
• Optimize signal timing
• Bike lane upgrade
• Bike Signal
• Bollards
• Curb Ramps
• Protected Intersections
EXHIBIT A Page 123 of 288
371
Vision Zero Action Plan 105
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 124 of 288
372
106 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HA NSEN
R
D

E VALLECITOS RD

EVANS ST
L

EXINGTON WY

ORION WY

TRINITY
HILLS
LN

NORWOOD RD

ALDEN LN
C
NIAGAR

LOMITAS AV

PIENZA ST

VINCI WY

HAMPTON RD

PADUA WY

VEGA RD
COR

SATURN WY

MARS CT
CONCA

BETTONA ST

NOVARA ST
W

ETMORE RD

WESTBROOK LN

CAPELLA RD

MARS RD

LIVORNO ST

GEMINI RD

MERCURY RD

FA RMINGTO
N
WY
BRESSO
CT

BR ESSO DR

CODIROLI WY

BARLETA
LN

NEPTU NE RD

SIENA RD

ALLEGRO ST

FIORE BELLA WY
BAR
E V IN
EYA
R
D
AV

CARRARAWY

POLARIS WY

ANCONACI

VENUS WY

STONEBRIDGE RD
TRAVIS
O
CI

S LIVERMORE AV
N P ST
N
L
ST
JENSEN

JUNCTION AV

OLD FIRST ST

FIFTH ST
S L ST

MCLEOD ST

FOURTH ST

SCHOOL ST
N I ST

SCOTT ST
DEPOTD
R
N
N
ST

LOCOMOTIVE L N

RAILROAD AV

KENNEDY ST
S I ST

PESTANA WY

THIRD ST
S M ST

MAPLE ST

GARDELLA PLAZA

CHESTNUT ST

M I CHELL ST
LEE AV
S Q ST

THIRD ST
S J ST

SIXTH ST

CALLAGHAN ST
WOOD
ST
S N ST
S O ST
S P ST
S K ST

SECOND ST

PARK ST

INMAN ST

MARTIN AV

S OAK ST

CHURCH ST

N OAK ST

KELLY ST
G

E RMAINE WY

VETERANS WY

LADD AV

CLARKE AV
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles ¯
0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles ¯
Fatal
Severe Injury
Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
EXHIBIT A Page 125 of 288
373
Vision Zero Action Plan 107
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

FIFTH ST
S P ST

BERLINWY

CAMELIA DR

WAGONER DR

VANCOUVER WY

CATALINA CT
C
ATA
LIN
A
D
R
RA DR
ANZA
WY

ROSELLI DR
PA
RIS
WY

ELAINE AV

HUDSON WY

SECOND ST

MOCHO ST

COLUMBUS AV

FOURTH ST

COLLEGE AV

EL DORADO DR
FIRST
ST

RDOBA ST

EL CAMINITO

CONCANNON BL

ABERDEEN AV BALBOA WY

CORONADO WY

REDONDO WY

VERONA AV
MIRA
N
DA
WY

VIA GRANADA

CALAIS AV
S R ST
S Q ST
E

STANLEY
BL

THIRD ST

ASTI CT
S S ST

AARON ST

MURRIETA BL
M
AYVIEW
WY

VIA SEVILLE

ESSEX ST

RCELONA ST

VIA MADRID

FENTON ST

BATAVIA AV

CANTON AV
M A D
RO
N
E
WY

DUBLIN AV
L IS
B
O
N
AV
Microsoft, Vantor

EDINBURGH DR

HIGHLAND
ST

N MINES
R
D

PORTOLA AV

FIRST ST
N ST

HILLSIDE
AV
LAS

POSITAS
RD
ST

LOCH LOMAND WY

W I NDER M ERE
CI

MADEIRA WY

NEWBU RY
S T
T
R

DI GEC R EST CI
OP

PLAR CT

BELLMAWR DR

ELIOT DR CAMROSE AV

CHAUCER WY

EMERSON
DR

DUKE WY

MILTON WY

S OU THFRONT RD

SILVER OAKS WY

ARROYO VISTA
I580 EB

TECHNOLO
G
Y
D
R

TREVARNO RD

SHE R I D AN
CI

KNOT T INGH A M
CI
580
Microsoft, Vantor
EXHIBIT A Page 126 of 288
374
108 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
PROJECT 2

BIKE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS AND GAP CLOSURE
Bicycle lane gap closures to build out connectivity throughout the city and enhance existing bike lanes for added safety.

Corridors and intersections experienced eight bicycle-related KSI collisions and 110 pedestrian-related injury collisions, along with 50 community-identified concerns related to pedestrian safety. Among these, corridors with significant bicycle activity
experienced five KSI collisions and 24 total injury
collisions, along with 32 community-identified concerns related to bicycle safety. Notably, four of the five KSI collisions and 20 of the 24 injury collisions
occurred at intersections, highlighting these locations as critical areas of risk. Community feedback further reinforces these findings, with 18 concerns
specifically identifying intersection-related bicycle
safety challenges.

To address these issues, the proposed project focuses on improving the continuity and safety of the bicycle network. Recommended improvements
include closing gaps in existing bicycle lanes to
enhance connectivity, installing protected bicycle
crossings, and implementing protected intersection
treatments at key conflict points. Additional measures include traffic calming and the introduction of buffered or protected bicycle facilities to reduce vehicle speeds and improve rider comfort.

Together, these improvements aim to reduce vehicle-bicycle conflicts, enhance safety at high-risk locations, and support a more connected and accessible active transportation network. • Install Class II Bike Lane
• Install Class III Bike Route/Boulevard
• Install Class IV Bike Lane
Safety Improvements:

EXHIBIT A Page 127 of 288
375
Vision Zero Action Plan 109
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
EXHIBIT A Page 128 of 288
376
110 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Corridor Limits
Third St S L St to S Livermore Ave
E Jack London Blvd Isabel Ave to Murietta Blvd
First St
Mines Rd to Las Positas Rd
Portola Ave to Mines Rd
Maple St to Portola Ave
Holmes St Vineyard Ave to 4th St/Murrieta Blvd
Encino Dr Murdell Ln to El Caminito
S Livermore Ave 5th St to Portola Ave
4th St/Madeira Way Livermore Ave to Jensen Way
S L St Arroyo Mocho Trail to Pine St/Portola Ave
Murrieta Blvd Fenton St to Holmes St
Galloway St Bluebell Dr to Springtown Blvd
Rincon Ave Olivina Ave to Pine St
Jensen St
Madeira Way to Pestana Way
Pestana Way to Standford Way
Stanford Wy
Stanford Way to East Ave
Jensen St to Lincoln Ave
Lincoln Ave to Jefferson St
EXHIBIT A Page 129 of 288
377
Vision Zero Action Plan 111
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM
Proposed Bike Lane Improvement 2018 - ATP KSI
Collisions
Class II N/A 1
Class IV Bike Lane and Protected Intersections 2018 ATP Proposed 1 Class IV Bike Lane and Protected Intersections N/A 1
Class IV and Protected Intersections 2018 ATP Proposed 0 Class IV and Protected Intersections N/A 0
Class IV and Protected Intersections N/A 1
Class II Buffered N/A 1
Gap Closure and Intersection Improvements N/A 0
Gap Closure (TBD) Proposed Class 3E - Church St to
School St giving school excess 0
Gap Closure (TBD) Arroyo Mocho Trail to Portola Ave
- Class IIB 0
Gap Closure (TBD) 2018 ATP Proposed 0
Gap Closure (TBD) N/A 0
Gap Closure (TBD) 2018 ATP Proposed 0
Gap Closure (TBD) N/A 0
Gap Closure (TBD) 2018 ATP Proposed 0
Gap Closure (TBD) N/A 0
Gap Closure (TBD) 2018 ATP Proposed 0
Gap Closure (TBD) N/A 0
EXHIBIT A Page 130 of 288
378
112 City of Livermore
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

PATTERSON PASS RD
DALTON
AV
N P ST

N MINES RD

EAST AV

KITTY HAWK RD
N L ST

N LIVERM
ORE
AV

FIRST ST
E

VALLECITOS RD

JUNCTION
AV

OLIVINA AV

POR TOLA AV

COLLEGE AV

SUPERIOR
DR

AIRWAY BL ISABEL AV
E JACK

LONDON BL

S LIVERMORE
AV

LAS POS ITAS RD

CHARLOT TE WY

S VASCO RD

FOURTH ST

SOUTHFRONT RD

CONCANNON BL

SPRIN GT OWN BL
E

AI RWAY BL

BROADMOOR
ST

RAILROAD AV

BLUEBEL L
DR
JENSEN
ST

PINE ST
AMES
ST

MURDE LL LN

N VASCO RD

W JACK LONDON BL

MADEIRA
WY

SCENIC AV

VANCOUVER
WY

NATIONAL
DR

HILLCREST
AV

N MURRIET A
BL

WALL ST

ARLE NE
WY
MINE
R
S
D

EL CA MINITO

CENTRAL
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

COLLIER

CAN YON RD

ALDEN LN

CATALINA DR

NO R TH

CANYONS PW

SECOND ST

E STANLEY BL

NORTHFRONT
RD
BRISA
ST

GREENVILLE RD

ARROYO RD

E VINEYARD AV

LAS POSITAS RD

WETMORE RD
DOOLAN
RD
WENTE
ST

HAN S EN RD

EAST AV

PINE ST

HELIGAN LN

PYRAMID ST

SOUTHFRON T RD
WA
G

ONER DR LOMITAS AV

FIFTH ST
MAR IG
O LD
RD

CA TA LINA DR
S J ST
LA
U

GHL NI RD
D A
N A CI
N N ST

NAT IONAL DR

OLD O A K RD

FELICIAAV

PRESTONAV

ALMOND AV

PORTOLA AV

BESS AV
N K ST

WALL ST

SUNSET DR

HAZ EL ST

CHAT EAU WY

DISCOVERY D R

STANFORD WY

R E E S CI

W E TMORE RD

NAYLOR AV

A IRWAY BL
N O ST

RUTAN DR

CONCANNON B L

BRISA ST
MINES
RD

W JACK LONDON BL

ISABEL AV

N MINE S RD
I580 EB

BEL L AV

PATTERSON PASS RD
H
ALLCI I580 WB

S VASCO RD

LARIBERA
ST
I580 WB

LORRAINE RD

GREENVILLE RD
ISABEL
AV
580
580
Proposed Bike Facilities
Class 2 - Bike Lane
Class 2 - Buffered Bike Lane
Class 3 - Sharing Bike Lane
Class 4 - Separated Bikeways
To be decided
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

HOLMES ST

PATTERSON PASS RD
DALTON
AV
N P ST

N MINES RD

EAST AV

ITTY HAWK RD
N L ST

N LIVERM
ORE
A
V

FIRST ST
E

VALLECITOS RD

JUNCTION
AV

OLIVINA AV
PO

R TOLA AV

COLLEGE AV

SUPERIOR
DR

AIRWAY BL ISABEL AV
E JACK

LONDON BL

S LIVERMORE
AV

LAS POS ITAS RD

CHARLOT TE WY

S VASCO RD

FOURTH ST

SOUTHFRONT RD

CONCANNON BL

SPRIN GT OWN BL
E

AI RWAY BL

BROADMOOR
ST

RAILROAD AV

BLUEBEL L
DR
JENSEN
ST

PINE ST
A
MES
ST

MURDE LL LN

N VASCO RD
ON BL

MADEIRA
WY

SCENIC AV

VANCOUVER
WY

NATIONAL
DR

HILLCREST
AV

N MURRIET A
BL

WALL ST

ARLE NE
WY
MINE
R
S
D

EL CA MINITO

CENTRAL
A
V

LAUGHLIN
RD

COLLIER

CAN YON RD

ALDEN LN

CATALINA DR

NO R TH

YONS PW

SECOND ST

E STANLEY BL

NORTHFRONT
RD
BRISA
ST

GREENVILLE RD

ARROYO RD

E VINEYARD AV

LAS POSITAS RD

WETMORE RD
WENTE
ST

HAN S EN RD

EAST AV

PINE ST

HELIGAN LN
PY

RAMID ST

SOUTHFRON T RD
WA
G
O
NER
D

R LOMITAS AV

FIFTH ST
MAR IG
O LD
RD

CA TA LINA DR
S J ST
LA
U
G

HL NI R
D
D A
N A CI
N N ST

NAT IONAL DR

OLD O A K
R
D

FELICIAAV

PRESTONAV

ALMOND AV

PORTOLA AV

BESS AV
N K ST

WALL ST

SUNSET DR
H

AZ EL ST

CHAT EAU WY
DISC
O

VERY D R

STANFORD WY

R E E S
CI

W E TMORE RD

NAYLOR AV

A IRWAY BL
N O ST
R
U
TA
N
D
R

CONCANNON B L

BRISA ST
MINES
RD

ISABEL AV

N MINE S RD
I580 EB

BEL L AV

PATTERSON PASS RD
H
ALLCI I580 WB

S VASCO RD

LARIBERA
ST
I580 WB

LORRAINE RD

GREENVILLE RD
ISABEL
AV
580
580
Proposed Bike Facilities
Class 2 - Bike Lane
Class 2 - Buffered Bike Lane
Class 3 - Sharing Bike Lane
Class 4 - Separated Bikeways
To be decided
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±

EAST AV

S VASCO RD

FIRST ST

S LIVERMORE
AV
DALTON
AV

BLUEBEL L
DR

F OURTH
ST

OLLEGE AV

BROADMOOR
ST

JUNCTION
AV

PORTOLA AV

SCENIC AV
JENSEN
ST
S
P

RIN GT OWN BL
T
A
R
R
O
Y
O
R
D
MINE
R
S
D
S L ST

CONCANNON BL

CENTRAL
AV
C
H

ARLOT TE WY

MADEIRA
WY
N L ST

ROAD AV
N LIV
E
R
M
O
R
E
A
V

ARLEN E WY

ECOND ST

NORT HFRONT RD

SUPERIOR
DR
A
M

GREENVILLE RD
BRISA
ST

HILLCREST
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

NCOUVER
WY

N MINES RD

LAS POS ITAS RD

PATTERSON PASS RD

SOUTHFRONT RD

NATIONAL
DR
MORE
RD

LAS POSITAS RD
WENTE
ST
580
Collisions by severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Proposed Bike Facilities
Class 2 - Bike Lane
Class 2 - Buffered Bike Lane
Class 3 - Sharing Bike Lane
Class 4 - Separated Bikeways
TBD (To Be Decided)
Class 2 - Bike Lane
Class 2 - Buffered Bike Lane
Class 3 - Sharing Bike Lane
0 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles ±
EXHIBIT A Page 131 of 288
379
Vision Zero Action Plan 113
VISION ZERO C i t y o f L i v e r m o r e
TJKM

HOLMES ST

PATTERSON PASS RD
DALTON
AV
N P ST

N MINES RD

EAST AV

KITTY HAWK RD
N L ST

N LIVERM
ORE
AV

FIRST ST
E

VALLECITOS RD

JUNCTION
AV

OLIVINA AV

POR TOLA AV

COLLEGE AV

SUPERIOR
DR

AIRWAY BL ISABEL AV
E JACK

LONDON BL

S LIVERMORE
AV

LAS POS ITAS RD

CHARLOT TE WY

S VASCO RD

FOURTH ST

SOUTHFRONT RD

CONCANNON BL

SPRIN GT OWN BL
E

AI RWAY BL

BROADMOOR
ST

RAILROAD AV

BLUEBEL L
DR
JENSEN
ST

PINE ST
AMES
ST

MURDE LL LN

N VASCO RD

W JACK LONDON BL

MADEIRA
WY

SCENIC AV

VANCOUVER
WY

NATIONAL
DR

HILLCREST
AV

N MURRIET A
BL

WALL ST

ARLE NE
WY
MINE
R
S
D

EL CA MINITO

CENTRAL
AV

LAUGHLIN
RD

COLLIER

CAN YON RD

ALDEN LN

CATALINA DR

NO R TH

CANYONS PW

SECOND ST

E STANLEY BL

NORTHFRONT
RD
BRISA
ST

GREENVILLE RD

ARROYO RD

E VINEYARD AV

LAS POSITAS RD

WETMORE RD
DOOLAN
RD
WENTE
ST

HAN S EN RD

EAST AV

PINE ST

HELIGAN LN

PYRAMID ST

SOUTHFRON T RD
WA
G