Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Livingston City Council
December 17, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 17, 2024
Body
Livingston City Council
Pages
517
Original file
26.2 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityoflivingston.org. That file is the official record.

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Mar-16 8 9 11 t2 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,434,000 1,150,000 733,000 1,617,000 17,000 1,319,000 0 0 6,270,000 2 826,000 1,399,000 754,000 2,000,000 172,000 1,260,000 0 50,000 6,461,000 3 766,000 1,361,000 810,000 1,659,000 50,000 1,373,000 0 220,000 6,239,000 4 1,129,000 1,001,000 599,000 1,766,000 89,000 1,321,000 0 270,000 6,175,000 5 618,000 611,000 175,000 1,602,000 264,000 1,068,000 0 150,000 4,488,000 6 0 0 0 1,118,000 549,000 0 0 0 1,667,000
7 649,000 726,000 222,000 1,650,000 203,000 0 0 190,000 3,640,000 8 1,750,000 1,247,000 190,000 0 1,517,000 0 0 1,250,000 5,954,000 9 1,609,000 1,378,000 583,000 0 1,819,000 0 0 520,000 5,909,000 10 1,597,000 1,152,000 300,000 0 1,411,000 0 0 1,110,000 5,570,000 11 1,657,000 1,589,000 781,000 0 1,815,000 0 0 470,000 6,312,000 12 1,323,000 1,492,000 886,000 182,000 1,528,000 0 0 730,000 6,141 ,000 13 541,000 732,000 117,000 1,384,000 1,179,000 0 0 70,000 4,023,000 14 0 1,049,000 175,000 1,535,000 819,000 0 0 30,000 3,608,000 15 1,867,000 1,202,000 804,000 128,000 1,418,000 0 0 370,000 5,789,000 16 1,619,000 1,062,000 346,000 1,238,000 1,484,000 0 0 110,000 5,859,000 17 1,452,000 1,019,000 226,000 1,609,000 1,410,000 0 0 180,000 5,896,000 18 1,608,000 1,238,000 401,000 1,455,000 337,000 0 0 360,000 5,399,000 19 915,000 1,144,000 405,000 1,507,000 705,000 0 0 0 4,676,000 20 0 402,000 0 1,452,000 0 0 0 0 1,854,000
21 55,000 478,000 285,000 1,375,000 1,373,000 0 0 460,000 4,026,000 22 1,197,000 1,385,000 610,000 1,408,000 1,118,000 0 0 420,000 6138,000 23 998,000 1,424,000 569,000 1,483,000 1,309,000 0 2,000 270,000 6,055,000 24 1,374,000 1,110,000 539,000 1,381,000 1,445,000 49,000 0 250,000 6,148,000 25 981,000 1,143,000 845,000 1,390,000 1,068,000 45,000 0 340,000 5,812,000 26 1,020,000 585,000 220,000 1,298,000 1,739,000 2,000 0 20,000 4,884,000 27 0 103,000 0 1,114,000 338,000 0 0 510,000 2,065,000
28 464,000 1,043,000 16,000 970,000 1,362,000 57,000 0 0 3,912,000 29 1,686,000 1,494,000 81,000 1,641,000 1,566,000 24,000 0 60,000 6,552,000 30 1,823,000 923,000 2,000 1,230,000 1,374,000 107,000 0 530,000 5,989,000 31 1,080,000 1,365,000 749,000 1,528,000 1,277,000 214,000 0 280,000 6,493,000 TOTALS 32,038,000 32,007,000 12,423,000 36,720,000 30,755,000 6,839,000 2,000 9,220,000 160,004,000

Page 245 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Apr-16 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,539,000 1,125,000 547,000 1,561,000 1,493,000 0 0 350,000 6,615,000 2 1,090,000 859,000 633,000 1,425,000 1,488,000 0 0 0 5,495,000 3 0 10,000 0 1,385,000 1,458,000 0 0 0 2,853,000
4 30,000 497,000 433,000 1,610,000 1,346,000 2,000 0 350,000 4,268,000 5 1,465,000 1,255,000 987,000 1,528,000 736,000 6,000 0 500,000 6,477,000 6 1,263,000 1,216,000 598,000 1,386,000 1,634,000 27,000 0 440,000 6,564,000 7 1,384,000 1,363,000 565,000 1,605,000 1,499,000 119,000 0 520,000 7,055,000 8 1,501,000 1,190,000 521,000 1,342,000 1,395,000 464,000 0 270,000 6,683,000 9 898,000 751,000 428,000 1,460,000 1,504,000 9,000 0 180,000 5,230,000 10 0 0 1,000 1,248,000 802,000 0 0 0 2,051,000
11 23,300 611,000 418,000 1,225,000 1,129,000 24,000 0 100,000 3,530,300 12 1,487,000 903,000 683,000 1,441,000 1,519,000 38,000 0 240,000 6,311,000 13 1,145,000 1,258,000 731,000 1,426,000 1,645,000 300,000 0 0 6,505,000 14 1,551,000 1,447,000 814,000 1,398,000 859,000 26,000 0 550,000 6,645,000 15 1,615,000 1,401,000 713,000 1,634,000 1,394,000 0 0 20,000 6,777,000 16 1,655,000 1,500,000 753,000 1,550,000 415,000 162,000 0 510,000 6,545,000 17 619,000 1,047,000 402,000 1,378,000 1,373,000 0 0 240,000 5,059,000 18 941,000 969,000 443,000 1,672,000 725,000 83,000 0 510,000 5,343,000 19 1,469,000 1,217,000 803,000 1,594,000 93,000 879,000 0 530,000 6,585,000 20 1,438,000 1,114,000 756,000 1,546,000 1,369,000 553,000 0 400,000 7,176,000 21 1,830,000 1,593,000 908,000 1,476,000 1,341,000 92,000 0 210,000 7,450,000 22 1,343,000 1,138,000 701,000 1,579,000 1,527,000 0 0 360,000 6,648,000 23 1 472.000 1450000 769 000 1 606 000 1409 000 54 000 0 0 6 760 000 24 1,198,000 1,387,000 373,000 1,579,000 370,000 0 0 700,000 5,607,000 25 829,000 1,172,000 463,000 1,418,000 16,000 7,000 0 540,000 4,445,000 26 1,625,000 1,561,000 563,000 1,521,000 1,381,000 25,000 0 60,000 6,736,000 27 1,456,000 1,229,000 462,000 1,551,000 1,441,000 61,000 0 470,000 6,670,000 28 1,616,000 1,343,000 580,000 1,743,000 1,192,000 177,000 0 380,000 7,031,000 29 150,700 282,000 0 1,389,000 1,494,000 935,000 0 410,000 4,660,700 30 890,000 260,000 544,000 1,354,000 1,408,000 139,000 0 330,000 4,925,000 31 TOTALS 33,523,000 31,148,000 16,592,000 44,630,000 35,455,000 4,182,000 0 9,170,000 174,700,000

Page 246 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
May-16 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 21,000 0 167,000 1,521,000 1,196,000 88,000 0 30,000 3,023,000 2 820,000 93,000 470,000 1,228,000 1,236,000 634,000 0 0 4,481,000 3 1,705,000 1,478,000 700,000 1,584,000 1,560,000 226,000 0 250,000 7,503,000 4 1,503,000 1,342,000 676,000 1,611,000 1,519,000 0 32,000 140,000 6,823,000 5 1,604,000 1,428,000 792,000 1,444,000 1,414,000 7,000 13,000 470,000 7,172,000 6 1,541,000 1,189,000 523,000 1,584,000 1,491 ,000 24,000 26,000 70,000 6,448,000 7 1,376,000 1,178,000 338,000 1,498,000 861,000 0 0 0 5,251,000 8 0 69,000 0 1,303,000 840,000 19,000 0 0 2,231,000
9 859,000 499,000 374,000 1,728,000 1,240,000 24,000 2,000 10,000 4,736,000 10 1,506,000 1,295,000 631,000 1,645,000 1,446,000 0 380,000 0 6,903,000 11 1,693,000 1,414,000 725,000 1,658,000 1,501,000 48,000 354,000 250,000 7,643,000 12 1,553,000 1,259,000 758,000 1,652,000 1,245,000 0 659,000 200,000 7,326,000 13 1,598,000 1,176,000 819,000 1,727,000 1,655,000 211,000 797,000 250,000 8,233,000 14 1,082,000 15,000 324,000 1,753,000 1,234,000 254,000 694,000 440,000 5,796,000 15 19,000 436,000 2,000 1,694,000 1,462,000 26,000 168,000 0 3,807,000 16 748,000 895,000 338,000 1,542,000 1,372,000 0 276,000 0 5,171,000 17 1,666,000 1,473,000 727,000 1,559,000 1,335,000 59,000 483,000 190,000 7,492,000 18 1,512,000 1,307,000 763,000 1,804,000 1,622,000 32,000 608,000 610,000 8,258,000 19 1,678,000 1,455,000 812,000 1,543,000 1,107,000 21,000 604,000 500,000 7,720,000 20 1,469,000 1,331,000 760,000 1,803,000 1,453,000 0 863,000 390,000 8,069,000 21 1,106,000 1,264,000 440,000 1,753,000 1,343,000 59,000 155,000 120,000 6,240,000 22 123,000 349,000 3,000 1,596,000 1,335,000 75,000 452,000 0 3,933,000 23 786,000 909,000 445,000 1,484,000 1,462,000 0 214,000 230,000 5,530,000 24 1,399,000 1,225,000 621,000 1,704,000 1,416,000 0 425,000 300,000 7,090,000 25 1,556,000 1,402,000 731,000 1,61 5,000 1,378,000 3,000 431,000 400,000 7,516,000 26 1,579,000 1,412,000 821,000 1,724,000 1,371,000 106,000 586,000 0 7,599,000 27 1,429,000 1,428,000 822,000 1,581,000 1,525,000 419,000 975,000 450,000 8,629,000 28 1,683,000 1,500,000 722,000 1,422,000 1,220,000 34,000 560,000 230,000 7,371,000 29 1,108,000 1,367,000 355,000 1,641,000 1,389,000 0 466,000 90,000 6,416,000 30 400,000 8,000 0 1,433,000 1,379,000 0 265,000 160,000 3,245,000 31 840,000 727,000 391,000 1,827,000 1,612,000 1,000 324,000 330,000 5,212,000 TOTALS 35,962,000 30,923,000 16,050,000 49,661,000 42,219,000 2,370,000 10,812,000 6,110,000 194,107,000

Page 247 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Jun-16 8 9 11 12. 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,529,000 1,300,000 717,000 1,428,000 1,227,000 152,000 604,000 620,000 7,577,000 2 1,645,000 1,418,000 796,000 1,767,000 1,353,000 90,000 788,000 20,000 7,877,000 3 1,562,000 1,340,000 711,000 1,472,000 1,368,000 269,000 831,000 340,000 7,893,000 4 1,147,000 1,238,000 656,000 1,775,000 1,593,000 30,000 500,000 60,000 6,999,000 5 468,000 52,000 114,000 1,618,000 1,332,000 0 764,000 210,000 4,558,000 6 914,000 907,000 395,000 1,790,000 1,364,000 3,000 436,000 520,000 6,329,000 7 1,111,000 1,264,000 724,000 1,518,000 1,044,000 211,000 716,000 230,000 6,818,000 8 1,172,000 1,960,000 572,000 1,641,000 1,421,000 234,000 700,000 290,000 7,990,000 9 1,101,000 1,979,000 817,000 2,056,000 879,000 4,000 606,000 240,000 7,682,000 10 1,197,000 1,143,000 614,000 1,420,000 1,385,000 101,000 778,000 510,000 7,148,000 11 1,274,000 1,509,000 277,000 1,615,000 1,252,000 28,000 380,000 1,000 6,336,000 12 122,000 1,472,000 19,000 1,611,000 1,461,000 0 513,000 0 5,198,000 13 774,000 1,226,000 405,000 1,523,000 962,000 180,000 685,000 40,000 5,795,000 14 1,590,000 1,534,000 748,000 1,533,000 1,372,000 94,000 541,000 380,000 7,792,000 15 1,471,000 1,548,000 691,000 1,696,000 1,557,000 14,000 779,000 390,000 8,146,000 16 1,519,000 1,523,000 619,000 1,524,000 1,212,000 0 691,000 330,000 7,418,000 17 1,485,000 1,505,000 717,000 1,600,000 1,404,000 108,000 766,000 630,000 8,215,000 18 1,316,000 1,772,000 689,000 1,604,000 1,268,000 0 576,000 260,000 7,485,000 19 18,000 1,327,000 61,000 1,441,000 1,327,000 68,000 428,000 30,000 4,700,000 20 787,000 1,336,000 471,000 1,436,000 1,386,000 232,000 553,000 130,000 6,331,000 21 1,670,000 1,662,000 805,000 1,559,000 1,365,000 398,000 776,000 560,000 8,795,000 22 1,252,000 1,303,000 662,000 1,750,000 1,575,000 419,000 1,143,000 210,000 8,314,000 23 1,570,000 1,590,000 733,000 1,391,000 1,079,000 424,000 664,000 360,000 7,811,000 24 1,477,000 1,506,000 764,000 1,858,000 1,406,000 365,000 913,000 390,000 8,679,000 25 1,487,000 1,703,000 837,000 1,647,000 1,295,000 244,000 881,000 450,000 8,544,000 26 1,269,000 1,604,000 542,000 1,646,000 1,321,000 161,000 834,000 300,000 7,677,000 27 932,000 1,119,000 496,000 1,421,000 1,335,000 200,000 546,000 300,000 6,349,000 28 1,508,000 1,001,000 765,000 1,609,000 1,326,000 137,000 955,000 770,000 8,071,000 29 1,552,000 1,625,000 744,000 1,784,000 1,472,000 658,000 897,000 400,000 9,132,000 30 1,797,000 694,000 812,000 1,429,000 1,171,000 884,000 787,000 750,000 8,324,000 TOTALS 36,716,000 41,160,000 17,973,000 48,162,000 39,512,000 5,708,000 21,031,000 9,721,000 219,983,000

Page 248 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Jul---16 B 9 11 u 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,450,000 522,000 701,000 1,585,000 1,398,000 898,000 1,008,000 650,000 8,212,000 2 1,645,000 1,017,000 828,000 1,596,000 1,266,000 454,000 848,000 720,000 8,374,000 3 1,667,000 671,000 561,000 1,470,000 1,414,000 362,000 837,000 300,000 7,282,000 4 249,000 205,000 155,000 1,636,000 1,305,000 87,000 261,000 220,000 4,118,000 5 648,000 1,002,000 539,000 1,569,000 1,357,000 90,000 437,000 350,000 5,992,000 6 1,685,000 1,594,000 612,000 1,580,000 45,000 1,314,000 940,000 420,000 8,190,000 7 1,487,000 1,431,000 724,000 1,440,000 908,000 496,000 683,000 340,000 7,509,000 8 1,554,000 1,144,000 796,000 1,639,000 1,351,000 395,000 926,000 810,000 8,615,000 9 1,581,000 1,168,000 713,000 1,531,000 1,228,000 139,000 894,000 520,000 7,774,000 10 595,000 624,000 532,000 1,566,000 1,250,000 305,000 905,000 470,000 6,247,000 11 732,000 948,000 549,000 1,641,000 1,477,000 105,000 597,000 450,000 6,499,000 12 1,585,000 1,096,000 735,000 1,385,000 1,113,000 156,000 832,000 790,000 7,692,000 13 1,603,000 1,101,000 763,000 1,589,000 1,333,000 594,000 961,000 340,000 8,284,000 14 1,532,000 1,277,000 696,000 1,516,000 1,229,000 614,000 714,000 100,000 7,678,000 15 1,594,000 1,314,000 801,000 1,649,000 1,474,000 363,000 988,000 740,000 8,923,000 16 1,513,000 1,283,000 724,000 1,719,000 1,267,000 347,000 668,000 160,000 7,681,000 17 1,562,000 1,003,000 524,000 1,505,000 1,249,000 360,000 920,000 340,000 7,463,000 18 1,154,000 991,000 395,000 1,497,000 986,000 349,000 634,000 260,000 6,266,000 19 1,554,000 1,272,000 718,000 1,614,000 1,388,000 478,000 694,000 150,000 7,868,000 20 1,547,000 1,221,000 678,000 1,516,000 237,000 915,000 814,000 720,000 7,648,000 21 1,749,000 1,353,000 838,000 1,710,000 50,000 1,296,000 1,060,000 570,000 8,626,000 22 1,485,000 1,064,000 793,000 1,399,000 1,212,000 587,000 853,000 840,000 8,233,000 23 1,513,000 1,045,000 1,372,000 1,801,000 1,190,000 5,000 961,000 50,000 7,937,000 24 D 725,000 7,000 1,495,000 1,319,000 23,000 553,000 840,000 4,962,000 25 806,000 859,000 459,000 1,487,000 952,000 263,000 572,000 760,000 6,158,000 26 1,514,000 1,171,000 723,000 1,578,000 967,000 781,000 906,000 0 7,640,000 27 1,611,000 1,475,000 753,000 1,563,000 1,168,000 997,000 814,000 60,000 8,441,000 28 1,786,000 902,000 613,000 1,588,000 1,254,000 474,000 777,000 940,000 8,334,000 29 1,465,000 1,136,000 689,000 1,617,000 626,000 854,000 940,000 740,000 8,067,000 30 1,693,000 1,007,000 517,000 1,639,000 793,000 450,000 898,000 480,000 7,477,000 31 6,997,000 742,000 0 1,786,000 644,000 0 620,000 710,000 11,499,000 TOTALS 47,556,000 32,363,000 19,508,000 48,906,000 33,450,000 14,551,000 24,515,000 14,840,000 235,689,000

Page 249 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Aug-16 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,340,000 1,078,000 455,000 1,450,000 0 399,000 770,000 670,000 6,162,000 2 1,509,000 1,126,000 720,000 1,628,000 1,324,000 25,000 512,000 660,000 7,504,000 3 1,629,000 1,357,000 635,000 1,643,000 831,000 232,000 830,000 950,000 8,107,000 4 1,616,000 1,221,000 590,000 1,652,000 1,322,000 172,000 619,000 670,000 7,862,000 5 1,684,000 1,310,000 831,000 1,581,000 1,219,000 228,000 973,000 930,000 8,756,000 6 1,531,000 787,000 517,000 1,709,000 1,261,000 3,000 841,000 110,000 6,759,000 7 265,000 496,000 2,000 1,647,000 1,377,000 1,000 545,000 310,000 4,643,000 I 8 744,000 722,000 370,000 1,528,000 1,145,000 0 536,000 590,000 5,635,000 9 1,596,000 1,259,000 743,000 1,663,000 1,337,000 190,000 616,000 740,000 8,144,000 10 1,702,000 1,211,000 740,000 1,632,000 1,338,000 434,000 788,000 700,000 8,545,000 11 1,495,000 1,164,000 669,000 1,603,000 1,255,000 397,000 808,000 160,000 7,551,000 12 1,829,000 1,464,000 887,000 1,778,000 1,270,000 242,000 1,073,000 900,000 9,443,000 13 1,513,000 971,000 293,000 1,420,000 1,327,000 4,000 623,000 220,000 6,371,000 14 762,000 1,001,000 179,000 1,747,000 1,200,000 2,000 511,000 230,000 5,632,000 15 798,000 870,000 501,000 1,442,000 1,258,000 0 315,000 680,000 5,864,000 16 1,536,000 1,239,000 750,000 1,711,000 1,283,000 166,000 922,000 480,000 8,087,000 17 1,295,000 127,000 757,000 1,604,000 1,281,000 418,000 859,000 950,000 7,291,000 18 1,533,000 1,306,000 797,000 1,551,000 1,218,000 86,000 947,000 700,000 8,138,000 19 1,164,000 1,138,000 661,000 1,622,000 1,249,000 374,000 923,000 1,100,000 8,231,000 20 1,524,000 1,297,000 782,000 1,823,000 1,352,000 434,000 921,000 310,000 8,443,000 21 1,220,000 1,034,000 234,000 1,531,000 1,266,000 68,000 295,000 620,000 6,268,000 22 736,000 742,000 352,000 1,547,000 1,253,000 61,000 503,000 570,000 5,764,000 23 1,484,000 1,299,000 901,000 1,376,000 1,154,000 171,000 741,000 490,000 7,616,000 24 1,294,000 1,175,000 670,000 1,718,000 1,323,000 528,000 967,000 790,000 8,465,000 25 1,407,000 1,211,000 756,000 1,526,000 1,322,000 54,000 727,000 590,000 7,593,000 26 1,451,000 1,369,000 876,000 1,972,000 1,187,000 237,000 933,000 840,000 8,865,000 27 1,269,000 1,006,000 378,000 1,296,000 1,273,000 12,000 540,000 450,000 6,224,000 28 136,000 927,000 2,000 1,776,000 1,370,000 24,000 301,000 190,000 4,726,000 29 632,000 804,000 403,000 1,474,000 1,208,000 46,000 629,000 530,000 5,726,000 30 1,424,000 1,150,000 764,000 1,708,000 1,366,000 0 683,000 349,000 7,444,000 31 1,315,000 1,262,000 706,000 1,616,000 1,297,000 190,000 660,000 491,000 7,537,000 TOTALS 39,433,000 33,123,000 17,921,000 49,974,000 37,866,000 5,198,000 21,911,000 17,970,000 223,396,000

Page 250 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Sep-16 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,299,000 1,142,000 777,000 1,743,000 1,361,000 189,000 878,000 520,000 7,909,000 2 1,511,000 1,200,000 721,000 1,618,000 1,281,000 229,000 802,000 670,000 8,032,000 3 1,205,000 1,258,000 306,000 1,630,000 981,000 75,000 509,000 620,000 6,584,000 4 747,000 802,000 161,000 1,539,000 1,232,000 186,000 336,000 390,000 5,393,000 5 432,000 413,000 0 1,676,000 968,000 2,000 4,000 110,000 3,605,000 6 880,000 1,017,000 383,000 1,572,000 871,000 0 147,000 350,000 5,220,000 7 1,365,000 1,246,000 527,000 1,788,000 1,461,000 198,000 851,000 760,000 8,196,000 8 1,363,000 1,195,000 677,000 1,759,000 1,412,000 222,000 760,000 130,000 7,518,000 9 1,333,000 1,351,000 810,000 1,587,000 1,281,000 151,000 617,000 660,000 7,790,000 10 1,650,000 1,550,000 864,000 1,847,000 1,489,000 50,000 663,000 580,000 8,693,000 11 763,000 683,000 150,000 1,387,000 1,055,000 1,000 524,000 480,000 5,043,000 12 1,079,000 808,000 322,000 1,578,000 1,402,000 0 710,000 380,000 6,279,000 13 1,468,000 1,247,000 698,000 1,614,000 1,312,000 32,000 427,000 530,000 7,328,000 14 1,012,000 988,000 447,000 1,862,000 1,435,000 109,000 681,000 360,000 6,894,000 15 1,395,000 853,000 495,000 1,746,000 1,430,000 16,000 432,000 530,000 6,897,000 16 1,215,000 225,000 646,000 1,465,000 1,169,000 201,000 709,000 870,000 6,500,000 . 17 1,169,000 497,000 470,000 1,876,000 1,452,000 38,000 161,000 660,000 6,323,000 18 684,000 861,000 0 1,628,000 355,000 0 347,000 0 3,875,000 19 1,625,000 1,359,000 566,000 1,520,000 89,000 259,000 609,000 520,000 6,547,000 20 1,440,000 1,217,000 750,000 1,725,000 400,000 276,000 889,000 780,000 7,477,000 21 1,347,000 1,087,000 736,000 1,564,000 1,390,000 1,000 709,000 430,000 7,264,000 22 1,530,000 1,080,000 712,000 1,857,000 1,513,000 11,000 847,000 340,000 7,890,000 23 1,486,000 1,028,000 802,000 1,578,000 1,191,000 28,000 815,000 450,000 7,378,000 24 1,952,000 1,585,000 1,050,000 1,596,000 1,354,000 1,000 825,000 450,000 8,813,000 25 304,000 666,000 346,000 1,818,000 1,628,000 6,000 380,000 270,000 5,418,000 26 531,000 953,000 441,000 1,452,000 14,000 80,000 712,000 0 4,183,000 27 1,283,000 1,338,000 714,000 1,536,000 1,548,000 80,000 448,000 150,000 7,097,000 28 1,213,000 1,104,000 708,000 1,695,000 1,410,000 19,000 896,000 540,000 7,585,000 29 1,533,000 1,253,000 685,000 1,493,000 1,143,000 44,000 566,000 430,000 7,147,000 30 1,752,000 999,000 629,000 1,644,000 1,406,000 2,000 850,000 510,000 7,792,000 TOTALS 36,566,000 31,005,000 16,593,000 49,393,000 35,033,000 2,506,000 18,104,000 13,470,000 202,670,000

Page 251 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Oct-16 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,103,000 725,000 287,000 1,637,000 1,317,000 3,000 280,000 180,000 5,532,000 2 85,000 723,000 0 1,619,000 764,000 0 479,000 460,000 4,130,000 3 1,425,000 1,185,000 348,000 1,560,000 721,000 0 356,000 0 5,595,000 4 1,502,000 1,221,000 778,000 1,579,000 1,344,000 28,000 131,000 350,000 6,933,000 5 1,256,000 1,128,000 721,000 1,527,000 1,012,000 0 907,000 830,000 7,381,000 6 1,185,000 1,265,000 705,000 1,595,000 1,395,000 2,000 631,000 600,000 7,378,000 7 1,059,000 1,168,000 799,000 1,596,000 1,322,000 30,000 865,000 820,000 7,659,000 8 890,000 932,000 523,000 1,430,000 1,311,000 0 660,000 170,000 5,916,000 9 15,000 529,000 0 1,620,000 1,415,000 0 23,000 0 3,602,000 10 554,000 782,000 423,000 1,541,000 1,452,000 10,000 432,000 400,000 5,594,000 11 1,264,000 1,257,000 501,000 1,577,000 1,435,000 45,000 948,000 590,000 7,617,000 12 1,247,000 1,283,000 855,000 1,483,000 1,175,000 0 928,000 750,000 7,721,000 13 1,126,000 1,156,000 705,000 1,512,000 1,027,000 238,000 917,000 320,000 7,001,000 14 1,172,000 1,016,000 766,000 1,564,000 1,405,000 225,000 763,000 420,000 7,331,000 15 1,429,000 939,000 772,000 1,662,000 1,340,000 6,000 930,000 510,000 7,588,000 16 615,000 398,000 16,000 1,554,000 1,403,000 9,000 6,000 0 4,001,000 17 585,000 940,000 406,000 1,496,000 653,000 0 389,000 80,000 4,549,000 18 1,165,000 1,146,000 740,000 750,000 1,411,000 404,000 927,000 30,000 6,573,000 19 1,255,000 1,232,000 839,000 1,413,000 1,371,000 88,000 707,000 230,000 7,135,000 20 1,218,000 1,194,000 765,000 1,215,000 1,461,000 171,000 666,000 230,000 6,920,000 21 1,198,000 1,081,000 856,000 1,554,000 1,548,000 6,000 668,000 840,000 7,751,000 22 1,415,000 1,235,000 842,000 1,541,000 1,150,000 35,000 644,000 200,000 7,062,000 23 887,000 841,000 522,000 1,608,000 1,464,000 1,000 205,000 310,000 5,838,000 24 1,241,000 777,000 445,000 1,428,000 616,000 4,000 365,000 220,000 5,096,000 25 1,415,000 1,069,000 738,000 1,559,000 1,439,000 0 327,000 100,000 6,647,000 26 1,301,000 1,043,000 646,000 1,559,000 1,216,000 32,000 825,000 440,000 7,062,000 27 1,091,000 1,127,000 761,000 1,596,000 1,468,000 31,000 671,000 300,000 7,045,000 28 1,367,000 1,202,000 922,000 1,487,000 1,395,000 30,000 265,000 540,000 7,208,000 29 616,000 752,000 211,000 1,689,000 1,013,000 2,000 153,000 50,000 4,486,000 30 0 4,220,000 7,000 1,607,000 0 1,000 34,000 90,000 5,959,000 31 723,000 725,000 357,000 1,452,000 620,000 65,000 8,000 10,000 3,960,000 TOTALS 31,404,000 34,291,000 17,256,000 47,010,000 36,663,000 1,466,000 16,110,000 10,070,000 194,270,000

Page 252 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Nov-16 8 9 u 12 13 14 15 16 17 TOTALS
1 1,355,000 1,333,000 809,000 1,411,000 1,126,000 50,000 438,000 160,000 0 6,682,000 2 959,000 1,024,000 509,000 1,586,000 1,453,000 362,000 0 111,527 5,893,000 3 1,130,000 1,184,000 649,000 1,598,000 1,335,000 254,000 380,000 160,957 6,690,957 4 1,046,000 1,066,000 655,000 1,464,000 1,358,000 flow 323,000 500,000 0 6,412,000 5 1,019,000 1,038,000 682,000 1,596,000 1,445,000 499,000 230,000 0 6,509,000 6 55,000 462,000 70,000 1,704,000 1,044,000 29,000 20,000 0 3,384,000 7 411,000 706,000 400,000 1,564,000 843,000 28,000 150,000 0 4,102,000 8 1,080,000 1,051,000 783,000 1,451,000 891,000 meter 1,045,000 90,000 0 6,391,000 9 1,047,000 843,000 694,000 1,565,000 1,567,000 713,000 90,000 0 6,519,000 10 1,120,000 1,241,000 802,000 1,584,000 1,248,000 279,000 290,000 38,797 6,602,797 • 11 817,000 846,000 514,000 1,720,000 1,362,000 in 73,000 30,000 0 5,362,000 12 0 702,000 0 1,940,000 0 3,000 0 0 2,645,000
13 5,000 209,000 0 1,391,000 0 44,000 0 0 1,649,000
14 531,000 870,000 315,000 1,575,000 95,000 384,000 130,000 0 3,900,000 15 934,000 841,000 695,000 1,695,000 1,535,000 for 294,000 330,000 0 6,324,000 16 1,130,000 1,111,000 763,000 1,467,000 1,323,000 188,000 0 0 5,982,000 17 1,074,000 1,137,000 668,000 1,559,000 1,517,000 57,000 0 0 6,012,000 18 1,153,000 1,174,000 440,000 1,511,000 1,502,000 163,000 20,000 190,351 6,153,351 19 641,000 785,000 240,000 1,729,000 1,105,000 3,000 0 0 4,503,000 20 303,000 344,000 2,000 1,427,000 0 rerpairs 18,000 0 0 2,094,000 21 22,000 902,000 437,000 1,630,000 610,000 314,000 0 0 3,915,000 22 1,258,000 1,008,000 773,000 1,453,000 1,154,000 46,000 496,000 210,000 0 6,398,000 23 990,000 1,014,000 816,000 1,616,000 1,474,000 88,000 311,000 0 33,384 6,342,384 24 453,000 538,000 111,000 1,485,000 380,000 2,000 3,000 0 0 2,972,000 25 513,000 809,000 529,000 1,651,000 717,000 0 0 0 0 4,219,000 26 325,000 645,000 347,000 1,551,000 616,000 0 548,000 240,000 0 4,272,000 27 0 507,000 0 0 1,200,000 0 4,000 0 0 1,711,000
28 309,000 972,000 358,000 884,000 1,306,000 42,000 35,000 0 44,132 3,950,132 29 6,000 1,317,000 811,000 1,508,000 1,374,000 1,000 201,000 830,000 230,764 6,278,764 30 1,179,000 1,228,000 804,000 1,529,000 1,440,000 83,000 126,000 180,000 0 6,569,000 TOTALS 20,865,000 26,907,000 14,676,000 44,844,000 31,020,000 312,000 7,235,000 3,880,000 809,912 150,548,912

Page 253 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2016
Dec-16 8 9 11 1Z 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 65,000 1,440,000 856,000 1,556,000 1,068,000 116,000 344,000 740,000 477,407 6,185,000 2 0 1,250,000 940,000 1,794,000 1,442,000 40,000 538,000 540,000 0 6,544,000 3 0 684,000 373,000 1,398,000 394,000 3,000 522,000 690,000 161,353 4,064,000 4 0 103,000 0 1,503,000 0 0 28,000 0 0 1,634,000
5 0 738,000 263,000 1,596,000 645,000 2,000 62,000 450,000 0 3,756,000 6 0 1,131,000 790,000 1,500,000 0 8,000 396,000 480,000 311,659 4,305,000 7 0 1,421,000 880,000 160,000 1,241,000 0 913,000 170,000 1,375,021 4,785,000 8 0 1,243,000 748,000 1,737,000 1,241,000 28,000 405,000 910,000 419,486 6,312,000 9 0 1,210,000 819,000 1,313,000 1,024,000 23,000 593,000 930,000 0 5,912,000 10 0 637,000 412,000 1,738,000 1,234,000 13,000 212,000 360,000 0 4,606,000 11 0 90,000 3,000 1,429,000 0 5,000 12,000 0 0 1,539,000 12 0 733,000 413,000 1,398,000 556,000 0 88,000 360,000 58,963 3,548,000 13 0 1,391,000 788,000 1,518,000 902,000 205,000 527,000 400,000 294,456 5,731,000 14 0 1,168,000 838,000 1,520,000 1,443,000 4,000 300,000 750,000 40,170 6,023,000 15 0 1,314,000 857,000 1,851,000 255,000 193,000 944,000 560,000 876,788 5,974,000 16 0 1,319,000 894,000 1,324,000 0 66,000 971,000 460,000 1,054,716 5,034,000 17 0 714,000 409,000 1,158,000 46,000 0 362,000 40,000 1,377,483 2,729,000 18 0 27,000 0 1,432,000 0 0 6,000 0 0 1,465,000
19 0 566,000 353,000 1,605,000 15,000 0 56,000 0 0 2,595,000 20 0 1,047,000 367,000 1,472,000 1,376,000 0 41,000 40,000 0 4,343,000 21 0 1,237,000 432,000 1,621,000 990,000 0 203,000 510,000 179,834 4,993,000 22 0 1,281,000 876,000 1,543,000 331,000 205,000 376,000 890,000 1,234,544 5,502,000 23 0 1,199,000 975,000 1,629,000 1,359,000 7,000 695,000 960,000 0 6,824,000 24 0 810,000 429,000 1,540,000 771,000 71,000 571,000 500,000 0 4,692,000 25 0 355,000 2,000 1,415,000 D 0 161,000 0 0 1,933,000
26 0 55,000 1,000 1,373,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,429,000
27 0 1,085,000 390,000 1,563,000 504,000 30,000 127,000 490,000 0 4,189,000 28 0 1,186,000 935,000 1,376,000 1,000,000 508,000 984,000 80,000 0 6,069,000 29 D 1,392,000 1,055,000 1,613,000 1,359,000 5,370,000 206,000 47,000 0 11,042,000 30 0 1,056,000 780,000 1,507,000 626,000 0 1,003,000 1,000,000 687,633 5,972,000 31 0 758,000 400,000 1,438,000 445,000 0 648,000 590,000 0 4,279,000 TOTALS 65,000 28,640,000 17,278,000 45,620,000 20,267,000 6,897,000 12,294,000 12,947,000 8,549,513 152,557,513

Page 254 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
2015
WELL# 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
JANUARY 39 548 000 0 0 48 603 000 21692000 42 771 000 9 593 000 3 609 000 165 816,000 FEBRUARY 38 461 000 0 0 40 585 000 12 522000 36 550 000 22 156 000 4 534000 154 808.000 MARCH 39125 000 0 0 50 267 000 32 577 000 40 458 000 25419 000 8289 000 196135,000 APRIL 46 596 000 20 786,000 12170,000 51463000 31980000 6431 000 23 493000 8 306 000 201 225.000 MAY 37 423 000 20177,000 18758,000 so 522 000 14 232 000 37 354000 18 850 000 1553000 198 869.000 JUNE 44999 ODO 32 508,000 18 821,000 46127 000 14101 000 35 n6 ooo 22 391 000 5174,000 219 897.000 JULY 47 559 000 25491.000 21 032.000 46413 000 24900 000 37 320 000 24971 000 7 350.000 235 036.000 AUGUST 40472 000 20484.000 20 029.000 49 870 000 14132 000 38183 000 21 858000 3 013 000 208 041 ODO SEPTEMBER 39 510 000 26 881 000 17135.000 46 997 000 790 000 36 307 000 15 989 000 2689 000 186 298 000 OCTOBER 39 063 000 15 982,000 18 299,000 47 322 000 6 742 000 38 430 000 14302 000 760 000 180 900 000 NOVEMBER 9 984000 10 819 000 7 224000 16 561 000 13 323 000 34 947 000 6 810.000 326 000 99,994000 DECEMBER 322 000 32 645,000 18 354 000 45162000 590 000 38 014 000 6 930,000 470 000 142 487 000 TOTALSlln 11all 423 062 000 205 TT3000 151822000 539.892000 187.581 000 422.541 000 212 762000 46073 000 2 189 506,000

Page 255 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
I
Jan-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,028,000 1,745,000 780,000 1,434,000 0 72,000 5,059,000 2 889,000 1,821,000 855,000 1,484,000 0 3,000 5,052,000 3 1,874,000 1,748,000 1,224,000 1,507,000 0 143,000 6,496,000 4 880,000 1,498,000 502,000 1,108,000 2,000 209,000 4,199,000 5 606,000 1,709,000 508,000 1,281,000 0 113,000 4,217,000 6 1,797,000 well well 1,785,000 1,277,000 1,534,000 0 25,000 6,418,000 7 1,338,000 1,764,000 981,000 1,473,000 0 172,000 5,728,000 8 2,231,000 1,935,000 1,289,000 1,562,000 0 26,000 7,043,000 9 1 778.000 1 909,000 1139 000 1507000 7 000 126 000 6,466 000 10 132,000 1,713,000 569,000 1,331,000 0 2,000 3,747,000 11 1,000 1,206,000 68,000 705,000 4,000 1,000 1,985,000 12 810,000 is is 1,292,000 519,000 1,540,000 0 0 4,161,000 13 1,752,000 1,558,000 1,679,000 1,408,000 206,000 28,000 6,631 000 14 1,754,000 1,664,000 1,170,000 1,476,000 2,000 127,000 6,193,000 15 1,798,000 1,691,000 1,194,000 1,453,000 58,000 508,000 6,702,000 16 1,723,000 1,548,000 555,000 1,491,000 1,163,000 29,000 6,509,000 17 1,144,000 1,514,000 329,000 1,453,000 82,000 0 4,522,000 18 0 1,230,000 145,000 1,032,000 14,000 0 2,421,000
19 892,000 1,493,000 624,000 1,313,000 0 0 4,322,000
20 1,654,000 1,600,000 1,127,000 1,469,000 0 232,000 6,082,000 21 1 801 000 off off 1,559,000 584,000 1,485,000 889,000 93,000 6,411,000 22 1,667,000 1,458,000 240,000 1,467,000 1,224,000 63,000 6,119,000 23 1,819,000 1,722,000 1,344,000 1,452,000 141,000 25,000 6,503,000 24 1,115,000 1,456,000 416,000 1,511,000 685,000 0 5,183,000 25 0 1,153,000 28,000 833,000 0 0 2,014,000
26 870 000 1,444,000 808,000 1,363,000 12,000 4,000 4,501,000 27 1,758,000 1,521,000 341,000 1,453,000 1,120,000 89,000 6,282,000 28 1,736,000 1,591,000 174,000 1,458,000 1,108,000 288,000 6,355,000 29 1,789,000 1,447,000 152,000 1,405,000 1,235,000 719,000 6,747,000 30 1,766,000 line line 1,613 000 510,000 1,373 000 1174.000 512 000 6.948 000 31 1,146,000 1,216,000 561,000 1,410,000 467,000 0 4,800,000 TOTALS 39,548,000 0 0 48,603,000 21,692,000 42.771,000 9,593,000 3,609,000 165,816,000

Page 256 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Feb-15 8 9 f1 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 487,000 990,000 6,000 999,000 0 0 2,482,000
2 939,000 1,323,000 658,000 137,000 71,000 212,000 3,340,000 3 1,737,000 1,512,000 202,000 1,295,000 1,166,000 0 5,912,000 4 1 737 000 well well 1,486,000 598,000 1,412.000 1,159,000 272,000 6,664,000 5 1,642,000 1,498,000 60,000 1,474,000 1,153,000 955,000 6,782,000 6 1,851,000 1,579,000 69,000 1,294,000 1,196,000 563,000 6,552,000 7 1,825,000 1,681,000 550,000 1,558,000 1,333,000 323,000 7,270,000 8 993 000 1,270,000 309,000 1,361,000 255,000 0 4,188,000 9 790,000 1,233,000 238,000 1,253,000 335,000 4,000 3,853,000 10 1,789,000 is is 1,589,000 581,000 1,512,000 1,181,000 31,000 6,683,000 11 1,786,000 1,485,000 537,000 1,582,000 1,161,000 68,000 6,619,000 12 1,825,000 1,534,000 710,000 1,565,000 1,161,000 26,000 6,821,000 13 1,859,000 1,547,000 617,000 1,445,000 1,137,000 318,000 6,923,000 14 1,612,000 1,629,000 793,000 1,416,000 1,161,000 26,000 6,637,000 15 1,547,000 1,474,000 306,000 822,000 0 0 4,149,000
16 0 993,000 32,000 733,000 0 0 1,758,000
17 1,140.000 1,374,000 142,000 1,544,000 412,000 18,000 4,630,000 18 1,547,000 off off 1,379,000 627,000 1,212,000 1,156,000 5,000 5,926,000 19 1,737,000 1,233,000 867,000 1,544,000 1;135,000 191,000 6,707,000 20 1,622,000 1,522,000 742,000 1,430,000 1,095,000 285,000 6,696,000 21 1 094,000 1,434,000 660,000 1,152,000 788,000 0 5,128,000 22 0 1,341,000 36,000 1,316,000 0 0 2,693,000
23 759,000 1,265,000 142,000 1,274,000 545,000 0 3,985,000 24 1,825,000 1,614,000 355,000 1,491,000 1,121,000 283,000 6,689,000 25 1,789,000 line line 1,580,000 772,000 1,437,000 1,080,000 3,000 6 661.000 26 1,634,000 1,610,000 715,000 1,445,000 1,163,000 1,000 6,568,000 27 1,789,000 1,711,000 431 ,000 1,484,000 1,188,000 471,000 7,074,000 28 1,106,000 1,699,000 773,000 1,363,000 4,000 479,000 5,424,000 29 Totals 38,461,000 0 0 40,585,000 12,522,000 36,550,000 22,156,000 4,534,000 154,814,000

Page 257 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Mar-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 36,000 1,375,000 53,000 1,359,000 3,000 0 2,826,000
2 39,000 1,548,000 251,000 1,234,000 698,000 675,000 4,445,000 3 1,893,000 1,483,000 852,000 1,569,000 869,000 464,000 7,130,000 4 1,495,000 well well 1,628,000 835,000 1,094,000 993,000 110,000 6,155,000 5 1,729,000 1,737,000 1,057,000 1,477,000 1,136,000 124,000 7,260,000 6 1,851,000 1,675,000 1,050,000 1,286,000 1,076,000 495,000 7,433,000 7 1,146,000 1,635,000 667,000 1,335,000 1,078,000 0 5,861,000 8 0 1,302,000 180,000 1,165,000 315,000 369,000 3,331,000 9 916,000 1,565,000 669,000 1,171,000 590,000 21,000 4,932,000 10 1,787,000 1,653,000 1,546,000 1,451,000 1,032,000 169,000 7,638,000 11 1,669,000 is is 1 646,000 1,263,000 1,287,000 1 073,000 611 000 7,549,000 12 1,735,000 1,717,000 827,000 1,310,000 1,125,000 261,000 6,975,000 13 1,612,000 1,739,000 1,562,000 1,462,000 1,079,000 83,000 7,537,000 14 1,802,000 1,757,000 1,698,000 1,237,000 1,144,000 75,000 7,713,000 15 1,167,000 1 640.000 966.000 1 284000 9 000 454 000 5,520,000 16 859,000 1,509,000 953,000 1,256,000 479,000 37,000 5,093,000 17 1,675,000 1,737,000 1,549,000 1,360,000 1,110,000 337,000 7,768,000 18 1,637,000 1,588,000 1,520,000 1,279,000 993,000 436,000 7,453,000 19 1,723,000 off off 1 588,000 1,665,000 1,395,000 1,070,000 182,000 7,623,000 20 1,588,000 1,675,000 1,616,000 1,133,000 1,059,000 723,000 7,794,000 21 1,185,000 1,736,000 1,043,000 1,383,000 860,000 260,000 6,467,000 22 0 1,646,000 168,000 1,274,000 0 3,000 3,091,000
23 879,000 1,496,000 783,000 1,173,000 506 000 29.000 4,866,000 24 1,912,000 1,738,000 1,722,000 1,435,000 1,227,000 38,000 8,072,000 25 1,560,000 1,716,000 1,374,000 1,424,000 995,000 439,000 7,508,000 26 1,729,000 1,676,000 1,543,000 1,357,000 1,127,000 670,000 8,102,000 27 1,630,000 1,694,000 1,472,000 1,259,000 1,024,000 994 000 8,073,000 28 1,334,000 line tine 1,604,000 783,000 1,345,000 1,077,000 161,000 6,304 000 29 0 1,565,000 604,000 1,139,000 136,000 0 3,444,000
30 834,000 1,794,000 1,162,000 1,321,000 533,000 6,000 5,650,000 31 1,703,000 1,405,000 1,144,000 1,204,000 1,003,000 63,000 6,522,000 TOTALS 39125,000 50,267,000 32,577 000 40 458.000 25,419,000 8,289,000 196,135,000

Page 258 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Aor-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,640,000 0 0 1,738,000 1,510,000 1,240,000 1,039,000 430,000 7,597,000 2 1,628,000 0 0 1,575,000 1,232,000 1,309,000 1,043,000 280,000 7,067,000 3 1,851,000 0 0 1,947,000 1,873,000 1,252,000 1,125,000 1,460,000 9,508,000 4 1,694,000 0 0 1,394,000 1,266,000 0 954,000 1,360,000 6,668,000 5 1,223,000 0 0 1,662,000 1,089,000 0 755,000 230,000 4,959,000 6 901,000 1,156,000 0 1,460,000 1,222,000 0 591,000 30,000 5,360,000 7 1,585,000 1,857,000 0 1,886,000 1,189,000 0 1,125,000 500,000 8,142,000 8 1,653 000 1,672,000 0 1,612,000 864 000 0 865,000 110 000 6 776,000 9 1,621,000 1,739,000 0 1,751,000 1,032,000 0 1,044,000 160,000 7,347,000 10 1,734,000 1,617,000 989,000 1,905,000 1,320,000 0 343,000 30,000 7,938,000 11 1,719,000 1,157,000 286,000 1,541,000 1,163,000 0 760,000 160,000 6,786,000 12 874,000 0 0 1,766,000 1,118,000 0 646,000 100,000 4,504,000 13 872,000 895,000 5,000 1,703,000 1,359,000 0 711,000 230,000 5,775,000 14 1,640,000 1,634,000 823,000 1,633,000 841,000 0 913,000 0 7,484,000 15 1,563,000 1,380,000 678,000 1,759,000 932,000 0 1,031,000 60,000 7,403,000 16 1,724,000 1,655,000 832,000 1,669,000 1,231,000 0 631,000 180,000 7,922,000 17 1,244,000 1 227 000 400 000 1,917,000 1,075,000 0 591,000 187,000 6,641,000 18 1,671,000 0 1,000 1,626,000 384,000 0 287,000 0 3,969,000 19 1,577,000 0 0 1,754,000 479,000 0 169,000 0 3,979,000 20 1,509,000 880,000 23,000 1,757,000 436,000 0 277,000 20,000 4,902,000 21 1,711,000 453,000 369 000 1,588,000 856,000 0 764,000 30,000 5,771,000 22 1,643,000 12,000 747,000 1,723,000 892,000 0 967,000 33,000 6,017,000 23 1 626 000 1 545,000 879 000 1774000 1117 000 0 880 000 60 000 7 881 000 24 1,654,000 1,606,000 896,000 1,933,000 1,230,000 0 722,000 40,000 8,081,000 25 1,710,000 301,000 909,000 1,651,000 991,000 0 985,000 1,090,000 7,637,000 26 1,708,000 0 957,000 1,881,000 1,038,000 0 1,028,000 1,010,000 7,622,000 27 1,719,000 0 806,000 1,680,000 1,147,000 0 878,000 320,000 6,550,000 28 1,548,000 0 864,000 1,664,000 1,024,000 0 902,000 136,000 6,138,000 29 1,590,000 0 801,000 1,474,000 826,000 1,218,000 523,000 60,000 6,492,000 30 1,764,000 0 905,000 2,040,000 1,244,000 1,412,000 944,000 0 8,309,000 31 TOTALS 46,596,000 20,786,000 12,170,000 51,463,000 31,980,000 6,431,000 23,493,000 8,306,000 201 225,000

Page 259 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Mav-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,596,000 0 773,000 1,717,000 1,333,000 1,225,000 863,000 100,000 7,607,000 2 1,808,000 0 948,000 1,637,000 1,214,000 1,391,000 1,046,000 180,000 8,224,000 3 1,039,000 0 660,000 1,618,000 942,000 1,128,000 514,000 70,000 5,971,000 4 1,049,000 0 441,000 1,604,000 1,181,000 1,077,000 556,000 0 5,908,000 5 1,816,000 0 934,000 1,543,000 1,078,000 1,391,000 831,000 160,000 7,753,000 6 1,460,000 0 842,000 1,764,000 1,082,000 1,272,000 849,000 200,000 7,469,000 7 1,751,000 0 847,000 1,851,000 1,033,000 1,333,000 996,000 73,000 7,884,000 8 1,694,000 0 851,000 1,511,000 695,000 1,419,000 462,000 0 6,632,000 9 1,018,000 0 616,000 1,799,000 640,000 1,221,000 197,000 0 5,491,000 10 193,000 0 0 1,467,000 330,000 1,021,000 0 0 3,011,000 11 1,023,000 819,000 340,000 1,811,000 251 000 1,392,000 0 0 5,636,000 12 942,000 1,675,000 760,000 1,310,000 512,000 1,173,000 487,000 130,000 6,989,000 13 86,000 1,718,000 859,000 1,936,000 1,129,000 1,341,000 415,000 143,000 7,627,000 14 1,415,000 1,482,000 770,000 1,672,000 239,000 1,213,000 145,000 0 6,936,000 15 1,670,000 1,024,000 949.000 1,638,000 8,000 1227000 572 000 0 7,088,000 16 1,215,000 490,000 337,000 1,824,000 80,000 1,277,000 451,000 10,000 5,684,000 17 127,000 0 0 1,678,000 144,000 1,173,000 355,000 0 3,477,000 18 887,000 0 548,000 1,642,000 266,000 1,320,000 667,000 0 5,330,000 19 1 497,000 1,036,000 692,000 1,694,000 139,000 1,067,000 711,000 0 6,836,000 20 1,629,000 1,206,000 861,000 1,727,000 144,000 1,297,000 741,000 20,000 7,625,000 21 1,715,000 1,114,000 893,000 1,681,000 120,000 1,342,000 735,000 50,000 7,650,000 22 1,585,000 1,133,000 974,000 1,680,000 237,000 1,120,000 747,000 30,000 7,506,000 23 1,633.000 1,166,000 630.000 1,741,000 102,000 1,302,000 660 000 0 7 234 000 24 1,101,000 1,173,000 371,000 1,705,000 131,000 1,213,000 747,000 70,000 6,511,000 25 3,000 19,000 0 1,333,000 167,000 1,152,000 276,000 0 2,950,000 26 1,046,000 752,000 415,000 1,374,000 80,000 1,248,000 508,000 0 5,423,000 27 1,512,000 1,086 000 774 000 1,545,000 199,000 1174,000 920,000 150,000 7 360.000 28 1,714,000 1,366,000 799,000 2,210,000 388,000 1,280,000 868,000 0 8,625,000 29 1,771,000 1,610,000 874,000 777,000 314,000 1,339,000 1,011,000 150,000 7,846,000 30 1,397,000 529,000 0 1,563,000 54,000 1,226,000 744,000 17,000 4,133,000 31 31,000 779,000 0 1,470,000 0 776,000 0 3,025,000
TOTALS 37,423 000 20,177,000 18 758 000 50,522 000 14,232,000 37,354,000 18 850.000 1,553,000 198,869,000

Page 260 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Jun-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 759,000 607,000 53,000 1,467,000 178,000 1,111,000 326,000 0 4,501,000 2 1,698,000 894,000 300,000 1,538,000 1,000 1,200,000 557,000 0 6,188,000 3 1,661,000 1,023,000 235,000 1,372,000 213,000 1,221,000 296,000 10,000 6,031,000 4 1,572,000 1,141,000 340,000 1,414,000 188,000 1,124,000 410,000 0 6,189,000 5 1,777,000 1,649,000 753,000 1,771,000 263,000 1,277,000 1,075,000 17,000 8,582,000 6 1,745,000 1,614,000 896,000 1,384,000 272,000 1,231,000 885,000 420,000 8,447,000 7 1,120,000 1,184,000 536,000 1,728,000 186,000 1,332,000 568,000 130,000 6,784,000 8 758,000 765,000 388,000 1,307,000 208,000 882,000 599,000 120,000 5,027,000 9 1,711,000 1,562,000 865,000 1,626,000 398,000 1,291,000 887,000 1,000 8,341,000 10 1,626,000 1,458,000 820,000 1,520,000 450,000 1,172,000 907,000 320,000 8,273,000 11 1,837,000 1,657,000 908,000 1,501,000 525,000 1,234,000 814,000 70,000 8,546,000 12 1,501,000 1,485,000 750,000 1,626,000 1,445,000 1,202,000 920,000 260,000 9,189,000 13 1,728,000 333,000 905,000 1,728,000 231,000 1,387,000 968,000 490,000 7,770,000 14 1,560,000 106,000 538,000 1,446,000 370,000 1,078,000 596,000 120,000 5,814,000 15 974,000 752,000 349,000 1 242.000 199,000 968,000 562,000 170,000 5,216,000 16 1,693,000 1,519,000 848,000 1,660,000 421,000 1,218,000 900,000 320,000 8,579,000 17 1,661,000 1,473,000 828,000 1,600,000 403,000 1,198,000 960,000 270,000 8,393,000 18 1,720,000 1,553,000 851,000 1,432,000 512,000 1,219,000 798,000 210,000 8,295,000 19 1666000 1,569 000 820 000 1 831,000 678.000 1,274 000 1,008 000 256,000 9,102,000 20 1,602,000 1,212,000 766,000 1,445,000 557,000 1,199,000 823,000 120,000 7,724,000 21 1,663,000 1,212,000 483,000 1,618,000 272,000 1,190,000 496,000 290,000 7,224,000 22 1,251,000 1,212,000 356,000 1,437,000 263,000 1,033,000 484,000 180,000 6,216,000 23 1792000 1,408 000 853 000 1,832,000 604,000 1,251,000 1,144,000 440 000 9,324,000 24 1,577,000 13,000 786,000 1,151,000 1,130,000 1,252,000 713,000 310,000 6,932,000 25 1,679,000 1,465,000 839,000 1,584,000 958,000 1,189,000 884,000 340,000 8,938,000 26 1,572,000 1,430,000 754,000 1,475,000 723,000 1,135,000 814,000 160,000 8,063,000 27 1,744,000 237,000 751,000 1,530,000 956,000 1,293,000 665,000 0 7,176 000 28 709,000 0 45,000 1,470,000 279,000 1,160,000 580,000 0 4,243,000 29 873,000 305,000 393,000 1,512 000 585,000 1,127,000 727,000 150,000 5,672,000 30 1,770,000 1,670,000 812,000 1,880,000 633,000 1,328,000 1,025,000 0 9,118,000 TOTALS 44,999,000 32,508,000 18,821,000 46,127,000 14,101,000 35,776,000 22,391,000 5,174,000 219,897,000

Page 261 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Jul-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,561,000 1,057,000 709,000 1,359,000 794,000 1,134,000 788,000 540,000 7,942,000 2 1,665,000 1,152,000 719,000 1,504,000 1,195,000 1,205,000 867,000 100,000 8,407,000 3 1,621,000 16,000 808,000 1,444,000 955,000 1,211,000 875,000 410,000 7,340,000 4 1,665,000 52,000 710,000 1,532,000 491,000 1,200,000 553,000 40,000 6,243,000 5 445,000 0 166,000 1,396,000 752,000 1,106,000 414,000 0 4,279,000 6 1,125,000 715,000 372,000 1,684,000 398,000 1,228,000 811,000 210,000 6,543,000 7 1,638,000 1,520,000 771,000 1,431,000 477,000 1,186,000 745,000 30,000 7,798,000 8 1,655,000 1,532,000 782,000 1,558,000 520,000 1,218,000 915,000 480,000 8,660,000 9 1,702,000 608,000 794,000 1,470,000 1,416,000 1,289,000 868,000 80,000 8,227,000 10 1,765,000 1,003,000 793,000 1,374,000 999,000 1,197,000 840,000 510,000 8,481,000 11 1 660 000 155 000 762,000 1.552 000 1,051,000 1,365 000 419 000 30,000 6.994,000 12 1,384,000 0 0 1,484,000 271,000 1,118,000 628,000 0 4,885,000 13 1,056,000 708,000 421,000 1,545,000 481,000 1,015,000 806,000 0 6,032,000 14 1,585,000 1,116,000 774,000 1,394,000 636,000 1,270,000 920,000 0 7,695,000 15 1,724,000 1,654,000 778.000 1,455,000 646 000 1,317,000 886,000 10 000 8,470 000 16 1,644,000 1,558,000 804,000 1,604,000 986,000 1,210,000 921,000 0 8,727,000 17 1,660,000 932,000 774,000 1,517,000 1,295,000 1,213,000 904,000 560,000 8,855,000 18 1,862,000 358,000 762,000 1,488,000 1,263,000 1,254,000 879,000 590,000 8,456,000 19 1 556 000 548,000 746,000 1,538 000 818,000 1,204,000 922 000 230,000 7 562 000 20 1,073,000 681,000 537,000 1,423,000 352,000 1,092,000 684,000 230,000 6,072,000 21 1,678,000 121,000 806,000 1,544,000 1,342,000 1,260,000 965,000 170,000 7,886,000 22 1,694,000 1,103,000 730,000 1,426,000 661,000 1,288,000 832,000 500,000 8,234,000 23 1,620,000 1,344,000 787,000 1,680 000 1025000 1,135,000 910,000 114,000 8 615,000 24 1,630,000 1,326,000 782,000 1,565,000 707,000 1,193,000 927,000 366,000 8,496,000 25 1,870,000 720,000 847,000 1,476,000 832,000 1,316,000 955,000 170,000 8,186,000 26 1557000 379,000 688,000 1 512,000 203,000 1,108,000 742.000 360 000 6,549,000 27 912,000 484,000 365,000 1,496,000 509,000 1,056,000 746,000 410,000 5,978,000 28 1,689,000 1,281,000 780,000 1,532,000 749,000 1,241,000 859,000 270,000 8,401,000 29 1,622,000 1,038,000 755,000 1,475,000 923,000 1,200,000 925,000 320,000 8,258,000 30 1.585 000 1,175,000 738,000 1,465.000 1 046.000 1,215 000 786.000 250,000 8.260 000 31 1,656,000 1,155 000 772,000 1,490,000 1107,000 1 276 000 679.000 370 000 8,505,000 TOTALS 47,559,000 25,491,000 21,032,000 46,413,000 24,900,000 37,320,000 24,971,000 7,350,000 235,036,000

Page 262 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Aua-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,791,000 725,000 774,000 1,622,000 158,000 1,216,000 581,000 0 6,867,000 2 654,000 0 311,000 1,521,000 381,000 1,216,000 543,000 0 4,626,000 3 810,000 572,000 471,000 1,479,000 418,000 1,079,000 717,000 133,000 5,679,000 4 1,647,000 1,176,000 766,000 1,386,000 308,000 1,273,000 747,000 170,000 7,473,000 5 1,650,000 1,210,000 761,000 1,442,000 358,000 1,127,000 897,000 390,000 7,835,000 6 1,664,000 1,394,000 780,000 1,649,000 566,000 1,206,000 885,000 70,000 8,214,000 7 1,643,000 1,388,000 757,000 1,443,000 366,000 1,223,000 895,000 210,000 7,925,000 8 1,973,000 1,546,000 941,000 1,903,000 621,000 1,561,000 1,058,000 0 9,603,000 9 1,502,000 244,000 696,000 1,444,000 255,000 1,115,000 701,000 187,000 6,144,000 10 793,000 661,000 382,000 1,376,000 184,000 985,000 692,000 93,000 5,166,000 11 1,778 000 1,381,000 825 000 1,555,000 284 000 1,318,000 897.000 130,000 8,168,000 12 1,554,000 413,000 784,000 1,591,000 871,000 1,205,000 926,000 250,000 7,594,000 13 1,671,000 831,000 767,000 1,593,000 335,000 1,247,000 850,000 0 7,294,000 14 1,653,000 949,000 782,000 1,605,000 516,000 1,243,000 870,000 200,000 7,818,000 15 1,669,000 476,000 829 000 1,837,000 30,000 1,341,000 377.000 0 6,559,000 16 710,000 133,000 10,000 1,741 ,000 820,000 1,326,000 354,000 0 5,094,000 17 769,000 274,000 372,000 1,324,000 497,000 1,032,000 572,000 140,000 4,980,000 18 1,634,000 728,000 799,000 1,591,000 823,000 1,251,000 496,000 0 7,322,000 19 1,809,000 740 000 883,000 1,654,000 884,000 1,338,000 794,000 150,000 8,252 000 20 1,565,000 564,000 788,000 1,762,000 824,000 1,148,000 636,000 0 7,287,000 21 1,689,000 782,000 782,000 1,619,000 389,000 1,233,000 838,000 260,000 7,592,000 22 124,000 73,000 818,000 1,610,000 342,000 1,340,000 577,000 50,000 4,934,000 23 0 48000 16.000 1,658,000 482,000 1,242,000 598.000 0 4,044,000 24 894,000 308,000 377,000 1,689,000 419,000 1,120,000 621,000 30,000 5,458,000 25 1,670,000 876,000 830,000 1,672,000 634,000 551,000 653,000 0 6,886,000 26 1,677,000 790,000 798,000 1,580,000 460,000 1,953,000 738,000 200,000 8,196,000 27 1,644,000 776,000 791,000 1,696,000 245,000 1 219,000 829,000 60,000 7,260 000 28 1,704,000 1,038,000 829,000 1,667,000 515,000 1,293,000 935,000 220,000 8,201,000 29 1,206,000 47,000 826,000 1,865,000 646,000 1,354,000 592,000 0 6,536,000 30 0 6,000 67,000 1,728,000 266,000 1,297,000 651,000 0 4,015,000 31 925,000 335,000 417,000 1,568,000 235,000 1,131,000 338,000 70,000 5,019,000 TOTALS 40,472,000 20 484.000 20,029,000 49 870 000 14,132,000 38,183,000 21.858,000 3,013 000 208,041,000

Page 263 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Seo-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,669,000 1,008,000 843,000 1,686,000 100,000 1,270,000 600,000 0 7,176,000 2 1,671,000 982,000 824,000 1,701,000 268,000 1,270,000 674,000 180,000 7,570,000 3 1,759,000 962,000 806,000 1,603,000 165,000 1,239,000 870,000 70,000 7,474,000 4 1,615,000 810,000 796,000 1,813,000 216,000 1,248,000 838,000 180,000 7,516,000 5 1,289,000 711,000 438,000 1,591,000 6,000 1,321,000 325,000 0 5,681,000 6 25,000 228,000 0 1,832,000 19,000 1,288,000 599,000 0 3,991,000 7 0 191,000 0 1,492,000 1,000 938,000 217,000 0 2,839,000 8 64,000 569,000 339,000 1,694,000 1,000 766,000 659,000 0 4,092,000 9 1,687,000 1,194,000 778,000 1,885,000 1,239,000 469,000 340,000 7,592,000 10 1,764,000 1,600,000 851,000 1,309,000 meter 1,322,000 515,000 210,000 7,571,000 11 1.674,000 1.566,000 823 000 1607000 1,179,000 696.000 280,000 7,825,000 12 1,758,000 842,000 302,000 1,351,000 1,209,000 301,000 0 5,763,000 13 381,000 123,000 0 1,517,000 1,439,000 617,000 0 4,077,000 14 810,000 750,000 225,000 1,341,000 in 1,006,000 652,000 50,000 4,834,000 15 1,690,000 1,483,000 720,000 1,438,000 1 205,000 396,000 140,000 7,072,000 16 1,764,000 985,000 809,000 1,453,000 1,311,000 487,000 0 6,809,000 17 1,539,000 1,051,000 753,000 1,613,000 1,134,000 445,000 170,000 6,705,000 ' 18 1,778,000 1,069,000 857,000 1,521,000 1,293,000 709,000 300,000 7,527,000 19 1,700,000 739,000 307 000 1,538,000 1,148,000 59,000 0 5,491,000 20 0 1,000 2,000 1,586,000 1,263,000 558,000 0 3,410,000 21 1,394,000 584,000 477,000 1,375,000 1,254,000 557,000 40,000 5,681,000 22 1,656,000 1,148,000 760,000 1,729,000 for 1,225,000 542,000 60,000 7,120,000 23 1,768,000 1,256,000 838 000 1 603,000 1,191,000 483,000 190,000 7,329 000 24 1,674,000 1,103,000 695,000 1,396,000 1,544,000 498,000 60,000 6,970,000 25 1,586,000 1,225,000 817,000 1,543,000 1,068,000 630,000 209,000 7,078,000 26 1,685,000 1,062,000 739,000 1,692,000 1,128,000 577,000 0 6,883,000 27 732,000 1,013 000 342,000 2,060,000 repairs 1202000 660,000 10 000 6,019,000 28 992,000 483,000 389,000 857,000 1,178,000 352,000 100,000 4,351,000 29 1,676,000 1,044,000 785,000 1,584,000 1,180,000 471,000 0 6,740,000 30 1,710,000 1,099,000 820,000 1,587,000 14,000 1,249,000 533,000 100,000 7,112,000 TOTALS 39,510,008 26,881,000 17,135,000 46,997,000 790,000 36,307,000 15,989,000 2,689,000 186,298,008

Page 264 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Oct-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,657,000 893,000 805,000 1,668,000 15,000 1,274,000 514,000 20,000 6,846,000 2 1,699,000 608,000 779,000 1,507,000 0 1,170,000 536,000 0 6,299,000 3 1,252,000 476,000 521,000 1,653,000 0 1,365,000 260,000 0 5,527,000 4 0 0 6,000 1,448,000 0 1,302,000 313,000 0 3,069,000
5 849,000 285,000 364,000 1,421,000 0 1,141,000 259,000 0 4,319,000 6 1,618,000 1,002,000 753,000 1,571,000 31,000 1,188,000 444,000 0 6,607,000 7 1,775,000 1,043,000 624,000 1,514,000 56,000 1,340,000 608,000 53,000 7,013,000 8 1,783,000 1,021,000 790,000 1,507,000 41,000 1,274,000 436,000 177,000 7,029,000 9 1,565,000 373,000 849,000 1,698,000 1,377,000 1,192,000 114,000 0 7,168,000 10 1,454,000 635,000 476,000 1,453,000 137,000 1,320,000 111,000 0 5,586,000 11 0 34,000 17,000 1,570,000 0 1,294,000 608,000 0 3,523,000 12 836,000 0 313,000 1,594,000 1,541,000 675,000 176,000 0 5,135,000 13 1,798,000 967,000 781,000 1,419,000 122,000 1,220,000 426,000 80,000 6,813,000 14 1,933,000 1,156,000 1,070,000 1,825,000 0 1,202,000 549,000 30,000 7,765,000 15 1,340,000 1,081,000 672,000 1,416,000 6 000 1,213,000 824,000 0 6,552 000 16 1,661,000 1,334,000 584,000 1,603,000 479,000 1,218,000 319,000 0 7,198,000 17 633,000 779,000 691,000 1,687,000 248,000 1,309,000 395,000 0 5,742,000 18 0 0 13,000 1,616,000 1,000 1,270,000 353,000 0 3,253,000 19 795,000 393,000 326,000 1,432,000 26,000 1 064,000 244,000 90 000 4,370,000 20 1,475,000 753,000 779,000 1,615,000 62,000 1,286,000 528,000 40,000 6,538,000 21 1,716,000 316,000 716,000 1,434,000 0 1,293,000 733,000 90,000 6,298,000 22 1,795,000 310,000 846,000 1,536,000 0 1,286,000 1,012,000 0 6,785,000 23 1,736,000 800,000 810,000 1,619,000 4,000 1,298,000 966,000 120.000 7,353,000 24 755,000 575,000 586,000 1,491,000 535,000 1,311,000 286,000 0 5,539,000 25 0 0 2,000 1,123,000 871,000 1,323,000 0 0 3,319,000
26 726,000 79,000 383,000 1,525,000 507,000 1,142,000 308,000 0 4,670,000 27 1,787,000 107,000 805,000 1,456,000 127,000 1,303 000 874,000 0 6,459,000 28 1,740,000 310,000 828,000 1,479,000 311 ,000 1,403,000 774,000 0 6,845,000 29 1,605,000 374,000 803,000 1,576,000 25,000 1,152,000 437,000 0 5,972,000 30 1,723,000 274,000 860,000 1,534,000 220,000 1,290,000 515,000 60,000 6,476,000 31 1,357,000 4,000 447,000 1,332,000 0 1,312,000 380,000 0 4,832,000 TOTALS 39,063 000 15 982,000 18,299,000 47 322,000 6,742,000 38,430,000 14,302,000 760,000 180 900,000

Page 265 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Nov-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 0 30,000 447,000 1,354,000 220,000 1,446,000 1,444,000 0 4,941,000 2 793,000 14,000 346,000 1,400,000 0 1,023,000 347,000 0 3,923,000 3 1,738,000 2,000 844,000 1,593,000 1,000 1,354,000 718,000 0 6,250,000 4 1,934,000 484,000 900,000 941,000 1,000 1,342,000 694,000 0 6,296,000 5 1,667,000 1,103,000 803,000 1,000 1,334,000 908,000 6,000 5,822,000 6 1,582,000 985,000 44,000 708,000 1,193,000 744,000 0 5,256,000 7 800,000 97,000 186,000 666,000 1,364,000 120,000 10,000 3,243,000 8 0 0 7,000 well 919,000 1,341,000 0 0 2,267,000
9 12,000 0 0 474,000 1,100,000 1,000 0 1,587,000
10 72,000 17,000 17,000 down 488,000 1,186,000 17,000 0 1,797,000 11 0 0 3 000 299,000 1,532,000 4,000 0 1,838,000
12 0 0 0 for 534,000 1,182,000 0 0 1,716,000
13 94,000 5,000 60,000 669,000 1,364,000 0 60,000 2,252,000 14 0 0 0 repairs 919,000 1,258,000 0 0 2,177,000
15 0 0 0 1,005,000 1,763,000 0 0 2,768,000
16 0 18,000 0 278,000 892,000 3,000 0 1,191,000
17 0 1,240,000 0 0 10,000 1,070,000 0 2,320,000
18 81,000 580,000 20,000 1,207,000 0 20,000 240,000 2,148,000 19 135.000 918,000 0 993,000 0 0 0 2 046 000
20 341,000 30,000 0 804,000 1,092,000 0 0 2,267,000
21 0 0 59,000 886,000 1,314,000 0 0 2,259,000
22 0 11,000 0 980,000 1,348,000 217,000 0 2,556,000
23 13,000 128,000 46,000 1,126,000 66,000 1,185,000 416,000 0 2,980,000 24 43,000 1,533,000 631,000 1,467,000 9,000 1,366,000 47,000 0 5,096,000 25 47,000 987,000 582,000 1,559,000 63,000 1,419,000 10,000 10,000 4,677,000 26 22,000 280,000 358,000 1,449,000 706,000 1,365,000 3,000 0 4,183,000 27 0 292.000 464,000 1,300,000 292,000 1,282 000 3,000 0 3,633,000 28 610,000 1,116,000 731,000 1,518,000 24,000 1,278,000 13,000 0 5,290,000 29 0 381,000 182,000 1,465,000 37,000 1,406,000 8,000 0 3,479,000 30 0 568,000 494,000 1,389,000 74,000 1,208,000 3,000 0 3,736,000 TOTALS 9,984,000 10,819,000 7,224,000 16,561,000 13,323,000 34,947,000 6,810,000 326,000 99,994,000

Page 266 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2015
Dec-15 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 40,000 1,404,000 652,000 1,508,000 117,000 1,401,000 6,000 0 5,128,000 2 47,000 1,147,000 785,000 1,630,000 144,000 1,339,000 33,000 0 5,125,000 3 23,000 1,037,000 814,000 1,664,000 7,000 1,349,000 95,000 70,000 5,059,000 4 22,000 1,347,000 32,000 1,418,000 97,000 1,351,000 964,000 100,000 5,331,000 5 15,000 1,524,000 1,009,000 1,793,000 0 2,445,000 22,000 0 6,808,000 6 0 1,143,000 189,000 1,409,000 0 369,000 38,000 0 3,148,000 7 0 335,000 420,000 1,443,000 0 1,422,000 31,000 10,000 3,661,000 8 41,000 1,422,000 478,000 1,440,000 221,000 1,235,000 990,000 0 5,827,000 9 17,000 1,295,000 674,000 1,792,000 4,000 1,264,000 204,000 10,000 5,260,000 10 30,000 1,546,000 873,000 1,654,000 0 1,352,000 200,000 0 5,655,000 11 45,000 1.551 000 965,000 1,383,000 0 1,352,000 101.000 0 5,397,000 12 0 902,000 931,000 1,383,000 0 1,447,000 9,000 10,000 4,682,000 13 0 0 0 921,000 0 866,000 0 0 1,787,000
14 0 697,000 472,000 1,246,000 0 916,000 10,000 10,000 3,351,000 15 0 1,523,000 738,000 1,547 000 0 1,537,000 3,000 10,000 5,358,000 16 0 1,440,000 735,000 1,605,000 0 1,287,000 83,000 10,000 5,160,000 17 0 1,697,000 908,000 1,681,000 0 1,467,000 241,000 0 5,994,000 18 42,000 1,300,000 729,000 1,465,000 0 1,244,000 570,000 0 5,350,000 19 0 1,040,000 446,000 1,527,000 0 1,268,000 248,000 0 4,529,000 20 0 0 0 1,112,000 0 399,000 0 0 1,511 ,000
21 0 125,000 448,000 1,142,000 0 1,127,000 421,000 0 3,263,000 22 0 1,369,000 872,000 1,634,000 0 1,371,000 703,000 0 5,949,000 23 0 1553000 941,000 1,474,000 0 1 421 000 431,000 210 000 6 030 000 24 0 1,012,000 926,000 1,577,000 0 1,315,000 538,000 0 5,368,000 25 0 723,000 545,000 1,248,000 0 984,000 35,000 0 3,535,000 26 0 0 1,000 1,064,000 0 629,000 4,000 0 1,698,000
27 0 0 0 1 090,000 0 504,000 0 0 1,594,000
28 0 714,000 258,000 1,507,000 0 1,234,000 15,000 30,000 3,758,000 29 0 1,542,000 799,000 1,477,000 0 1,350,000 383,000 0 5,551,000 30 0 1,606,000 845,000 1,661,000 0 1,349,000 322,000 0 5,783,000 31 0 1,651,000 869,000 1,667,000 0 1,420,000 230,000 0 5,837,000 TOTALS 322,000 32,645.000 18 354 000 45,162,000 590,000 38,014,000 6 930 000 470 000 142,487 000

Page 267 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
2014
WELL# 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
JANUARY 55,021,000 0 15,526,000 48,001,000 9,934,000 28,548,000 127,000 0 157,157,000 FEBRUARY 51,226,000 0 20,100,000 47,393,000 5,960,000 32,855,000 7,257,000 0 164,791,000 MARCH 56,228,000 0 21,385,000 44,083,000 14,488,000 35,520,000 476,000 0 172,180,000 APRIL 47,390,000 18,613,000 19,503,000 24,484,000 24,314,000 32,663,000 5,959,000 0 172,926,000 MAY 46,596,000 46,112,000 22,189,000 48,959,000 14,910,000 33,176,000 15,493,000 5,765,000 233,200,000 JUNE 45,308,000 45,184,000 17,618,000 43,929,000 12,887,000 35,761,000 24,797,000 18,271,000 243,755,000 JULY 47,542,000 39,955,000 2,369,000 46,332,000 39,391,000 38,080,000 25,678,000 14,402,000 253,749,000 AUGUST 47,073,000 40,978,000 29,883,000 48,948,000 23,355,000 38,226,000 23,291,000 2,295,000 254,049,000 SEPTEMBE~ 32,255,000 43,447,000 10,155,000 48,602,000 16,761,000 37,612,000 22,227,000 3,350,000 214,409,000 OCTOBER 48,601,000 13,540,000 6,632,000 50,223,000 26,130,000 37,687,000 24,164,000 6,931,000 213,908,000 NOVEMBER 45,619,000 0 0 48,115,000 21,091,000 38,605,000 3,105,000 1,429,000 157,964,000 DECEMBER 21,922,000 0 0 51,483,000 26,638,000 40,624,000 5,655,000 1,733,000 148,055,000 DTALS{in aa 544,781,000 247,829,009 165,360,000 550,552,000 235,859,000 429,357,000 158,229,000 54,176,000 2,386,143,000

Page 268 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
Well Numbers
Jan-14 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,947,000 well 527,000 1,759,000 412,000 891,000 0 0 5,536,000 2 1,820,000 476,000 1,673,000 28,000 888,000 0 0 4,885,000 3 2,084,000 1,010,000 2,068,000 505,000 1,570,000 0 0 7,237,000 4 1,794,000 866,000 1,864,000 631,000 1,348,000 0 0 6,503,000 5 1,898,000 553,000 1,782,000 523,000 1,019,000 0 0 5,775,000 6 1,709,000 35,000 1,382,000 65,000 131,000 1,000 0 3,323,000 7 1,603,000 1,041,000 1,572,000 718,000 1,585,000 0 0 6,519,000 8 2,254,000 was 1,010,000 1,930,000 520,000 1,325,000 0 0 7,039,000 9 1,747,000 284,000 1,435,000 46,000 1,113,000 122,000 0 4,747,000 10 1,705,000 45,000 1,059,000 0 986,000 0 0 3,795,000
11 1,690,000 43,000 1,149,000 0 1,150,000 0 0 4,032,000 12 1,799,000 714,000 1,618,000 0 1,370,000 0 0 5,501,000 13 1,690,000 136,000 1,291,000 99,000 918,000 0 0 4,134,000 14 1,697,000 0 1,204,000 0 0 0 0 2,901,000
15 1,771,000 off 0 1,117,000 0 0 0 0 2,888,000
16 1,683,000 0 1,291,000 0 0 0 0 2,974,000
17 1,624,000 0 1,115,000 0 26,000 0 0 2,765,000
18 1,773,000 0 1,159,000 0 0 0 0 2,932,000
19 1,723,000 1,000 783,000 10,000 22,000 3,000 0 2,542,000 20 838,000 0 1,052,000 0 4,000 0 0 1,894,000
21 1,539,000 3,000 1,243,000 1,000 176,000 0 0 2,962,000 22 1,800,000 404,000 1,460,000 102,000 1,107,000 0 0 4,873,000 23 1,910,000 for 974,000 1,977,000 571,000 1,448,000 0 0 6,880,000 24 2,026,000 1,033,000 1,824,000 870,000 1,615,000 0 0 7,368,000 25 1,950,000 1,016,000 2,017,000 875,000 1,322,000 0 0 7,180,000 26 1,920,000 832,000 1,918,000 781,000 1,451,000 0 0 6,902,000 27 1,562,000 595,000 1,898,000 275,000 1,337,000 1,000 0 5,668,000 28 1,879,000 978,000 1,869,000 685,000 1,437,000 0 0 6,848,000 29 1,923,000 1,006,000 1,977,000 766,000 1,469,000 0 0 7,141,000 30 1,849,000 1,009,000 2,022,000 873,000 1,415,000 0 0 7,168,000 31 1,814,000 repair 935,000 1,493,000 578,000 1,425,000 0 0 6,245,000 TOTALS 55,021,000 0 15,526,000 48,001,000 9,934,000 28,548,000 127,000 0 157,157,000

Page 269 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
Februarv 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,927,000 well 13,000 1,980,000 657,000 1,450,000 0 0 6,027,000 2 1,771,000 626,000 1,703,000 543,000 1,041,000 0 0 5,684,000 3 1,808,000 473,000 1,469,000 114,000 783,000 0 0 4,647,000 4 1,823,000 919,000 1,975,000 537,000 1,394,000 0 0 6,648,000 5 1,954,000 1,096,000 2,051,000 658,000 1,432,000 161,000 0 7,352,000 6 1,751,000 was 907,000 1,658,000 723,000 1,395,000 0 0 6,434,000 7 1,976,000 1,038,000 2,212,000 652,000 1,506,000 0 0 7,384,000 8 1,832,000 507,000 1,460,000 233,000 1,108,000 0 0 5,140,000 9 1,530,000 0 570,000 0 0 0 0 2,100,000
10 1,270,000 40,000 658,000 8,000 201,000 0 0 2,177,000 11 1,988,000 963,000 1,694,000 312,000 1,487,000 0 0 6,444,000 12 1,937,000 1,111,000 1,774,000 283,000 1,737,000 38,000 0 6,880,000 13 1,910,000 899,000 1,760,000 0 1,195,000 710,000 0 6,474,000 14 1,949,000 999,000 1,714,000 0 1,483,000 961,000 0 7,106,000 15 1,833,000 off 913,000 1,733,000 0 1,387,000 785,000 0 6,651,000 16 2,235,000 547,000 1,724,000 0 1,144,000 503,000 0 6,153,000 17 1,128,000 1,000 796,000 0 0 0 0 1,925,000
18 1,951,000 429,000 1,480,000 3,000 755,000 223,000 0 4,841,000 19 1,788,000 982,000 1,871,000 43,000 1,350,000 446,000 0 6,480,000 20 1,898,000 1,005,000 2,058,000 0 1,436,000 697,000 0 7,094,000 21 1,885,000 967,000 2,307,000 0 1,430,000 799,000 0 7,388,000 22 2,055,000 1,024,000 1,622,000 0 1,613,000 1,021,000 0 7,335,000 23 1,906,000 for 448,000 1,567,000 0 1,019,000 320,000 0 5,260,000 24 1,559,000 477,000 1,734,000 1,000 728,000 187,000 0 4,686,000 25 1,868,000 909,000 1,823,000 428,000 1,444,000 398,000 0 6,870,000 26 1,937,000 941,000 1,940,000 846,000 1,503,000 6,000 0 7,173,000 27 1,882,000 953,000 1,975,000 64,000 1,406,000 2,000 0 6,282,000 28 1,875,000 repairs 913,000 2,085,000 512,000 1,428,000 0 0 6,813,000 29 Totals 51,226,000 0 20,100,000 47,393,000 5,960,000 32,855,000 7,257,000 0 165,448,000

Page 270 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
MARCH 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 2,048,000 1,009,000 1,925,000 311,000 1,507,000 5,000 0 6,805,000 2 1,912,000 359,000 1,641,000 243,000 972,000 0 0 5,127,000 3 1,537,000 415,000 1,451,000 98,000 696,000 1,000 0 4,198,000 4 1,988,000 well 1,052,000 1,810,000 382,000 1,464,000 0 0 6,696,000 5 2,148,000 1,148,000 2,360,000 496,000 1,627,000 299,000 0 8,078,000 6 1,587,000 777,000 1,558,000 314,000 1,212,000 1,000 0 5,449,000 7 1,820,000 577,000 1,920,000 293,000 1,253,000 0 0 5,863,000 8 1,775,000 177,000 1,900,000 14,000 1,085,000 0 0 4,951,000 9 1,518,000 down 418,000 1,599,000 154,000 878,000 0 0 4,567,000 10 1,759,000 28,000 1,141,000 5,000 157,000 1,000 0 3,091,000 11 1,738,000 950,000 1,995,000 411,000 1,460,000 1,000 0 6,555,000 12 1,901,000 1,027,000 2,053,000 498,000 1,485,000 0 0 6,964,000 13 1,883,000 1,010,000 1,962,000 485,000 1,466,000 2,000 0 6,808,000 14 2,097,000 876,000 1,973,000 642,000 1,414,000
2,000 0 7,004,000
15 1,819,000 for 1,028,000 2,266,000 424,000 1,626,000 4,000 0 7,167,000 16 1,983,000 100,000 1,609,000 3,000 572,000 0 0 4,267,000 17 1,552,000 449,000 1,494,000 139,000 762,000 3,000 0 4,399,000 18 1,838,000 900,000 2,063,000 636,000 1,425,000 1,000 0 6,863,000 19 1,817,000 975,000 1,930,000 714,000 1,429,000 2,000 0 6,867,000 20 1,817,000 912,000 1,959,000 725,000 1,406,000 1,000 0 6,820,000 21 1,813,000 937,000 1,916,000 725,000 1,414,000 26,000 0 6,831,000 22 1,721,000 573,000 1,864,000 593,000 986,000 0 0 5,737,000 23 1,652,000 repairs 0 2,008,000 0 592,000 0 0 4,252,000 24 1,824,000 548,000 1,686,000 256,000 979,000 4,000 0 5,297,000 25 1,836,000 965,000 meter 995,000 1,401,000 100,000 0 5,297,000 26 1,919,000 1,183,000 in 1,173,000 1,472,000 15,000 0 5,762,000 27 1,853,000 841,000 for 1,012,000 1,410,000 0 0 5,116,000 28 1,812,000 938,000 repairs 1,149,000 1,361,000 4,000 0 5,264,000 29 2,115,000 1,089,000 1,005,000 1,601,000
4,000 0 5,814,000
30 1,493,000 100,000 266,000 321,000 0 0 2,180,000
31 1,653,000 24,000 327,000 87,000 0 0 2,091,000
TOTALS 56,228,000 0 21,385,000 44,083,000 14,488,000 35,520,000 476,000 0 172,180,000

Page 271 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
APRIL 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,846,000 0 822,000 flow 635,000 1,356,000 0 0 4,659,000 2 1,890,000 0 902,000 730,000 1,431,000 15,000 0 4,968,000 3 1,852,000 0 949,000 641,000 1,428,000 0 0 4,870,000
4 1,881,000 0 911,000 986,000 1,469,000 32,000 0 5,279,000 5 1,929,000 0 855,000 683,000 1,416,000 0 0 4,883,000
6 1,810,000 0 0 in for 468,000 481,000 0 0 2,759,000
7 1,634,000 0 52,000 883,000 118,000 0 0 2,687,000
8 1,930,000 0 940,000 1,286,000 1,483,000 1,000 0 5,640,000 9 2,003,000 0 934,000 1,276,000 1,543,000 0 0 5,756,000 10 1,905,000 0 930,000 1,141,000 1,349,000 393,000 0 5,718,000 11 1,772,000 0 923,000 1,475,000 1,440,000 380,000 0 5,990,000 12 1,838,000 0 1,135,000 repairs 1,013,000 1,388,000 760,000 0 6,134,000 13 1,676,000 0 43,000 581,000 773,000 46,000 0 3,119
,000
14 1,696,000 0 47,000 1,279,000 582,000 188,000 0 3,792,000 15 1,780,000 0 1,057,000 1,452,000 1,355,000 406,000 0 6,050,000 16 1,780,000 0 593,000 1,808,000 1,220,000 1,376,000 134,000 0 6,911 ,000
17 2,119,000 0 1,074,000 2,056,000 1,748,000 1,579,000 260,000 0 8,836,000 18 1,687,000 0 843,000 1,692,000 1,282,000 1,287,000 775,000 0 7,566,000 19 1,560,000 0 846,000 1,549,000 1,163,000 1,208,000 753,000 0 7,079,000 20 892,000 1,677,000 69,000 1,570,000 134,000 34,000 1,000 0 4,377,000 21 127,000 1,586,000 47,000 1,704,000 147,000 662,000 2,000 0 4,275,000 22 1,678,000 1,702,000 762,000 1,711,000 0 1,318,000 437,000 0 7,608,000 23 1 711.000 1768000 916.000 1937000 144.000 1375000 529 000 0 8.380.000 24 1,665,000 1,649,000 810,000 1,725,000 213,000 1,322,000 800,000 0 8,184,000 25 1,553,000 1,688,000 843,000 1,849,000 545,000 1,235,000 0 0 7,713,000
26 1,079,000 1,808,000 197,000 1,850,000 545,000 384,000 0 0 5,863,000 27 0 1,719,000 0 531,000 634,000 0 0 0 2,884,000
28 753,000 1,613,000 384,000 915,000 688,000 867,000
3,000 0 5,223,000
29 1,661,000 1,710,000 770,000 1,790,000 435,000 1,303,000 1,000 0 7,670,000
30 1,683,000 1,693,000 849,000 1,797,000 887,000 1,101,000 43,000 0 8,053,000 31 TOTALS 47,390,000 18,613,000 19,503,000 24,484,000 24,314,000 32,663,000 5,959,000 0 172,926,000

Page 272 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
MAY 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,878,000 1,915,000 1,020,000 1,821,000 1,097,000 1,115,000 72,000 0 8,918,000 2 1,494,000 1,522,000 805,000 1,794,000 1,241,000 1,168,000 363,000 0 8,387,000 3 1,544,000 1,783,000 772,000 1,891,000 942,000 964,000 4,000 0 7,900,000 4 0 1,752,000 8,000 1,649,000 54,000 605,000 4,000 0 4,072,000 5 722,000 1,479,000 338,000 1,629,000 640,000 777,000 0 0 5,585,000 6 1,622,000 1,702,000 693,000 1,738,000 1,120,000 1,196,000 2,000 0 8,073,000 7 1,616,000 1,723,000 1,178,000 1,711,000 439,000 1,103,000 102,000 0 7,872,000 8 1,714,000 1,702,000 531,000 1,776,000 654,000 1,211,000 18,000 0 7,606,000 9 1,623,000 1,687,000 897,000 1,717,000 1,355,000 1,171,000 269,000 0 8,719,000 10 1,709,000 1,624,000 533,000 1,767,000 651,000 800,000 5,000 0 7,089,000 11 1,735,000 0 4,000 1,812,000 327,000 110,000 0 0 3,988,000 12 1,360,000 986,000 454,000 1,168,000 1,187,000 800,000 0 0 5,955,000 13 1,555,000 1,590,000 726,000 1,407,000 1,484,000 1,185,000 408,000 0 8,355,000 14 1,511,000 1,654,000 821,000 1,419,000 1,187,000 1,158,000 693,000 650,000 9,093,000 15 1,569,000 1,769,000 895,000 1,576,000 1,320,000 1,242,000 370,000 286,000 9,027,000 16 1,641,000 1,684,000 1,039,000 1,668,000 1,212,000 1,260,000 1,081,000 106,000 9,691,000 17 1,602,000 1,758,000 591,000 1,060,000 0 1,139,000 559,000 248,000 6,957,000 18 1,467,000 254,000 3,000 1,312,000 0 1,070,000 134,000 0 4,240,000 19 1,398,000 81,000 55,000 1,245,000 0 1,037,000 273,000 0 4,089,000 20 1,754,000 1,782,000 1,165,000 1,643,000 0 1,399,000 1,126,000 585,000 9,454,000 21 1,565,000 1,677,000 1,080,000 1,639,000 0 1,216,000 1,130,000 286,000 8,593,000 22 1,650,000 1,732,000 1,112,000 1,578,000 0 1,246,000 1,065,000 148,000 8,531,000 23 1,600,000 1,741,000 1,173,000 1,594,000 0 1,283,000 1,113,000 173,000 8,677,000 24 1,736,000 1,737,000 1,188,000 1,746,000 0 1,324,000 1,234,000 6,000 8,971,000 25 1,424,000 1,550,000 515,000 1,385,000 0 1,050,000 494,000 0 6,418,000 26 1,466,000 918,000 53,000 1,412,000 0 747,000 469,000 0 5,065,000 27 1,657,000 1,786,000 648,000 1,382,000 0 1,026,000 655,000 349,000 7,503,000 28 1,328,000 1,614,000 1,050,000 1,767,000 0 1,114,000 1,185,000 958,000 9,016,000 29 1,673,000 1,655,000 1,064,000 1,426,000 0 1,270,000 911,000 204,000 8,203,000 30 1,788,000 1,692,000 1,192,000 1,985,000 0 1,291,000 1,259,000 1,357,000 8,776,000 31 1,195,000 1,563,000 586,000 1,242,000 0 1,099,000 495,000 409,000 5,394,000 TOTALS 46,596,000 46,112,000 22,189,000 48,959,000 14,910,000 33,176,000 15,493,000 5,765,000 233,200,000

Page 273 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
JUNE 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,195,000 1,682,000 0 1,462,000 0 1,134,000 163,000 0 4,441,000 2 1,373,000 1,486,000 647,000 1,352,000 0 973,000 653,000 430,000 5,541,000 3 1,610,000 1,425,000 1,170,000 1,605,000 128,000 1,258,000 1,075,000 1,025,000 7,686,000 4 1,634,000 1,714,000 1,121,000 1,836,000 0 1,263,000 1,186,000 365,000 7,485,000 5 1,506,000 1,567,000 1,124,000 1,522,000 0 1,312,000 1,010,000 900,000 7,435,000 6 1,616,000 1,654,000 1,183,000 1,474,000 0 1,243,000 1,064,000 1,409,000 8,027,000 7 1,542,000 1,634,000 620,000 1,590,000 0 1,250,000 766,000 511,000 6,371,000 8 1,382,000 413,000 80,000 1,633,000 0 1,215,000 720,000 0 4,061,000 9 1,365,000 1,416,000 451,000 1,237,000 0 751,000 615,000 765,000 5,235,000 10 1,630,000 1,678,000 1,240,000 1,772,000 0 1,265,000 1,229,000 1,021,000 8,205,000 11 1,986,000 2,047,000 1,354,000 1,519,000 0 1,290,000 1,085,000 311,000 9,592,000 12 1,075,000 1,147,000 650,000 1,656,000 0 1,236,000 926,000 792,000 7,482,000 13 1,663,000 1,677,000 1,106,000 1,810,000 0 1,314,000 1,230,000 1,170,000 9,970,000 14 1,644,000 1,711,000 581,000 1,489,000 0 1,415,000 747,000 553,000 8,140,000 15 1,171,000 1,315,000 2,000 1,214,000 0 786,000 168,000 0 4,656,000 16 1,412,000 1,372,000 791,000 314,000 823,000 1,068,000 696,000 0 6,476,000 17 1,878,000 1,912,000 1,284,000 1,715,000 0 1,542,000 1,323,000 16,000 9,670,000 18 1,474,000 1,511,000 855,000 1,455,000 0 1,269,000 1,010,000 1,033,000 8,607,000 19 1,537,000 1,670,000 1,005,000 1,934,000 0 1,225,000 1,047,000 1,101,000 9,519,000 20 1,760,000 1,491,000 1,198,000 1,762,000 0 1,426,000 1,265,000 1,306,000 10,208,000 21 1,308,000 1,375,000 513,000 1,388,000 0 1,070,000 562,000 734,000 6,950,000 22 1,310,000 1,380,000 42,000 1,439,000 0 1,068,000 218,000 0 5,457,000 23 1,470,000 1,472,000 549,000 1,441,000 0 992,000 629,000 628,000 7,181,000 24 1,496,000 1,494,000 52,000 1,553,000 1,695,000 1,199,000 750,000 1,255,000 9,494,000 25 1,598,000 1,525,000 well 1,474,000 1,683,000 1,275,000 806,000 538,000 8,899,000 26 1,676,000 1,608,000 out 1,483,000 1,732,000 1,344,000 1,022,000 151,000 9,016,000 27 1,701,000 1,440,000 of 1,625,000 1,787,000 1,300,000 894,000 579,000 9,326,000 28 1,510,000 1,591,000 service 1,451,000 1,786,000 1,371,000 1,012,000 833,000 9,554,000 29 1,441,000 1,432,000 0 966,000 1,668,000 1,101,000 400,000 480,000 7,488,000 30 1,345,000 1,345,000 0 758,000 1,585,000 806,000 526,000 365,000 6,730,000 TOTALS 45,308,000 45,184,000 17,618,000 43,929,000 12,887,000 35,761,000 24,797,000 18,271,000 243,755,000

Page 274 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
JULY 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,646,000 1,588,000 0 1,329,000 1,738,000 1,204,000 1,057,000 1,305,000 9,867,000 2 1,498,000 1,455,000 0 1,487,000 1,704,000 1,245,000 1,089,000 621,000 9,099,000 3 1,591,000 1,568,000 0 1,344,000 1,758,000 1,251,000 860,000 1,030,000 9,402,000 4 1,476,000 1,047,000 0 1,569,000 1,472,000 1,120,000 1,018,000 497,000 8,199,000 5 1,349,000 115,000 0 1,323,000 868,000 1,093,000 650,000 25,000 5,423,000 6 1,159,000 1,512,000 0 1,331,000 1,054,000 1,100,000 777,000 271,000 7,204,000 7 1,879,000 1,116,000 0 1,682,000 1,159,000 1,213,000 761,000 492,000 8,302,000 8 1,559,000 1,624,000 0 1,309,000 1,311,000 1,227,000 994,000 750,000 8,774,000 9 1,558,000 1,587,000 0 1,505,000 1,508,000 1,266,000 972,000 543,000 8,939,000 10 1,424,000 1,542,000 0 1,573,000 1,619,000 1,217,000 787,000 804,000 8,966,000 11 1,615,000 1,652,000 0 1,588,000 1,701,000 1,267,000 1,068,000 614,000 9,505,000 12 1,700,000 1,695,000 0 1,550,000 992,000 1,298,000 788,000 358,000 8,381,000 13 1,544,000 0 0 1,658,000 446,000 1,260,000 10,000 1,000 4,919,000 14 1,220,000 793,000 0 1,266,000 992,000 924,000 611,000 256,000 6,062,000 15 1,615,000 1,636,000 0 1,447,000 1,404,000 1,307,000 993,000 917,000 9,319,000 16 1,548,000 1,611,000 0 1,627,000 1,630,000 1,266,000 904,000 471,000 9,057,000 17 1,616,000 1,594,000 0 1,524,000 1,529,000 1,193,000 1,024,000 984,000 9,464,000 18 1,566,000 1,741,000 0 1,409,000 1,538,000 1,273,000 914,000 531,000 8,972,000 19 1,524,000 1,600,000 0 1,684,000 1,166,000 1,377,000 620,000 258,000 8,229,000 20 1,442,000 0 0 1,386,000 17,000 1,162,000 458,000 0 4 ,465,000 21 1,464,000 865,000 0 1,340,000 845,000 1,096,000 726,000 158,000 6,494,000 22 1,620,000 1,661,000 0 1,436,000 1,495,000 1,397,000 1,004,000 857,000 9,470,000 23 1,491,000 1,571,000 0 1,660,000 1,731,000 1,134,000 994,000 292,000 8,873,000 24 1,573,000 1,693,000 0 1,539,000 1,367,000 1,268,000 1,012,000 357,000 8,809,000 25 1,678,000 1,655,000 0 1,611,000 1,604,000 1,320,000 1,048,000 291,000 9,207,000 26 1,614,000 1,393,000 0 1,565,000 1,034,000 1,376,000 692,000 292,000 7,966,000 27 1,446,000 0 0 1,351,000 498,000 1,205,000 366,000 56,000 4,922,000 28 1,444,000 755,000 0 1,566,000 999,000 1,129,000 622,000 162,000 6,677,000 29 1,610,000 1,614,000 604,000 1,541,000 1,513,000 1,320,000 991,000 755,000 9,948,000 30 1,609,000 1,710,000 542,000 1,511,000 1,398,000 1,367,000 907,000 317,000 9,361,000 31 1,464,000 1,562,000 1,223,000 1,621,000 1,301,000 1,205,000 961,000 137,000 9,474,000 TOTALS 47,542,000 39,955,000 2,369,000 46,332,000 39,391,000 38,080,000 25,678,000 14,402,000 253,749,000

Page 275 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
AUGUST 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,550,000 1,633,000 1,203,000 1,673,000 1,480,000 1,258,000 1,028,000 200,000 10,025,000 2 1,488,000 1,508,000 991,000 1,522,000 875,000 1,191,000 498,000 71,000 8,144,000 3 1,402,000 0 737,000 1,372,000 102,000 1,067,000 72,000 0 4,752,000 4 1,484,000 612,000 793,000 1,570,000 893,000 1,004,000 604,000 25,000 6,985,000 5 1,492,000 1,572,000 932,000 1,383,000 1,062,000 1,285,000 836,000 14,000 8,576,000 6 1,512,000 1,616,000 980,000 1,748,000 1,130,000 1,248,000 908,000 74,000 9,216,000 7 1,535,000 1,912,000 1,231,000 1,427,000 1,125,000 1,520,000 818,000 3,000 9,571,000 8 1,506,000 1,358,000 1,201,000 1,585,000 1,222,000 1,037,000 928,000 56,000 8,893,000 9 1,547,000 1,647,000 921,000 1,522,000 505,000 1,347,000 792,000 1,000 8,282,000 10 1,414,000 517,000 783,000 1,529,000 0 1,113,000 129,000 0 5,485,000 11 1,376,000 708,000 767,000 1,397,000 434,000 920,000 588,000 21,000 6,211,000 12 1,548,000 1,618,000 1,058,000 1,688,000 1,073,000 1,305,000 953,000 222,000 9,465,000 13 1,521,000 1,575,000 1,163,000 1,388,000 692,000 1,325,000 803,000 58,000 8,525,000 14 1,594,000 1,678,000 1,166,000 1,864,000 830,000 1,322,000 933,000 22,000 9,409,000 15 1,513,000 1,574,000 1,155,000 1,468,000 903,000 1,314,000 900,000 84,000 8,911,000 16 1,661,000 1,582,000 1,097,000 1,663,000 1,273,000 1,319,000 884,000 196,000 9,675,000 17 1,427,000 113,000 839,000 1,586,000 25,000 1,234,000 426,000 0 5,650,000 18 1,416,000 710,000 718,000 1,415,000 587,000 946,000 588,000 0 6,380,000 19 1,681,000 1,778,000 1,076,000 1,551,000 1,038,000 1,393,000 927,000 94,000 9,538,000 20 1,435,000 1,468,000 1,112,000 1,726,000 690,000 1,180,000 954,000 73,000 8,638,000 21 1,587,000 1,700,000 995,000 1,457,000 799,000 1,326,000 1,002,000 0 8,866,000 22 1,685,000 1,782,000 1,159,000 2,064,000 1,310,000 1,379,000 960,000 69,000 10,408,000 23 1,433,000 1,501,000 947,000 1,215,000 707,000 1,218,000 647,000 68,000 7,736,000 24 1,486,000 944,000 895,000 1,611,000 444,000 1,147,000 479,000 0 7,006,000 25 1,301,000 670,000 428,000 1,489,000 617,000 978,000 574,000 0 6,057,000 26 1,582,000 1,641,000 942,000 1,496,000 931,000 1,331,000 998,000 47,000 8,968,000 27 1,544,000 1,658,000 868,000 1,763,000 573,000 1,277,000 867,000 120,000 8,670,000 28 1,534,000 1,623,000 934,000 1,761,000 628,000 1,280,000 860,000 25,000 8,645,000 29 1,637,000 1,678,000 888,000 1,382,000 762,000 1,356,000 808,000 165,000 8,676,000 30 1,695,000 1,741,000 1,029,000 2,006,000 529,000 1,390,000 1,070,000 587,000 10,047,000 31 1,487,000 861,000 875,000 1,627,000 116,000 1,216,000 457,000 0 6,639,000 TOTALS 47,073,000 40,978,000 29,883,000 48,948,000 23,355,000 38,226,000 23,291,000 2,295,000 254,049,000

Page 276 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
SEPTEMBE~ 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,454,000 0 1,000 1,450,000 6,000 900,000 77,000 0 3,888,000 2 1,483,000 1,004,000 501,000 1,578,000 262,000 1,016,000 633,000 7,000 6,484,000 3 1,576,000 1,571,000 865,000 1,659,000 244,000 1,272,000 751,000 258,000 8,196,000 4 1,657,000 1,717,000 951,000 1,660,000 282,000 1,347,000 883,000 95,000 8,592,000 5 1,543,000 1,613,000 924,000 1,742,000 489,000 1,278,000 1,004,000 81 ,000 8,674,000 6 1,724,000 1,718,000 945,000 1,529,000 603,000 1,314,000 885,000 4,000 8,722,000 7 1,542,000 426,000 817,000 1,542,000 0 1,302,000 240,000 0 5,869,000 8 1,372,000 848,000 375,000 1,588,000 29,000 993,000 468,000 128,000 5,801,000 9 1,668,000 1,679,000 340,000 1,673,000 957,000 1,290,000 913,000 510,000 9,030,000 10 1,603,000 1,596,000 352,000 1,568,000 810,000 1,379,000 1,298,000 110,000 8,716,000 11 1,820,000 1,795,000 44,000 1,551,000 608,000 1,452,000 711,000 127,000 8,108,000 12 1,624,000 1,599,000 0 1,978,000 1,489,000 1,377,000 1,116,000 141,000 9,324,000 13 1,561,000 1,530,000 0 1,458,000 998,000 1,310,000 951,000 196,000 8,004,000 14 1,588,000 1,278,000 0 1,606,000 438,000 1,170,000 703,000 150,000 6,933,000 15 1,603,000 765,000 0 1,555,000 473,000 1,285,000 695,000 241,000 6,617,000 16 1,696,000 1,640,000 0 1,577,000 1,164,000 1,370,000 1,013,000 206,000 8,666,000 17 1,680,000 1,639,000 0 1,797,000 926,000 1,362,000 1,060,000 177,000 8,641,000 18 1,745,000 1,669,000 0 1,725,000 781,000 1,403,000 996,000 66,000 8,385,000 19 1,723,000 1,659,000 0 1,729,000 1,206,000 1,374,000 1,073,000 159,000 8,923,000 20 975,000 1,569,000 0 1,606,000 1,010,000 1,351,000 975,000 323,000 7,809,000 21 0 1,843,000 0 1,503,000 659,000 1,241,000 269,000 0 5,515,000 22 0 940,000 0 1,628,000 496,000 1,077,000 523,000 7,000 4,671,000 23 0 1,864,000 0 1,553,000 1,080,000 1,530,000 791,000 37,000 6,855,000 24 pump 1,464,000 93,000 1,744,000 752,000 1,225,000 943,000 137,000 6,358,000 25 274,000 1,707,000 597,000 1,764,000 640,000 1,382,000 931,000 73,000 7,368,000 26 344,000 1,657,000 504,000 1,688,000 312,000 1,367,000 509,000 80,000 6,461,000 27 to 1,779,000 928,000 1,692,000 37,000 0 578,000 14,000 5,028,000 28 waste 1,529,000 521,000 1,480,000 2,000 2,080,000 185,000 0 5,797,000 29 0 1,528,000 441,000 1,469,000 3,000 684,000 387,000 2,000 4,514,000 30 0 1,821,000 956,000 1,510,000 5,000 1,481,000 666,000 21,000 6,460,000 TOTALS 32,255,000 43,447,000 10,155,000 48,602,000 16,761,000 37,612,000 22,227,000 3,350,000 214,409,000

Page 277 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
OCTOBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 0 1,531,000 747,000 1,580,000 2,000 1,247,000 591,000 23,000 5,721,000 2 0 1,656,000 924,000 1,663,000 5,000 1,108,000 491,000 45,000 5,892,000 3 0 1,743,000 941,000 1,758,000 8,000 1,341,000 918,000 37,000 6,746,000 4 0 1,703,000 900,000 1,774,000 1,330,000 1,343,000 982,000 154,000 8,186,000 5 0 1,795,000 614,000 1,537,000 226,000 1,215,000 438,000 3,000 5,828,000 6 220,000 1,528,000 201,000 1,311,000 289,000 892,000 450,000 4,000 4,895,000 7 1,782,000 1,531,000 0 1,873,000 634,000 1,229,000 955,000 0 8,004,000 8 1,834,000 1,565,000 0 1,501,000 408,000 1,301,000 828,000 26,000 7,463,000 9 1,973,000 488,000 0 2,194,000 1,143,000 1,340,000 835,000 459,000 8,432,000 10 2,281,000 0 1,078,000 1,355,000 1,337,000 1,793,000 1,144,000 456,000 9,444,000 11 1,850,000 0 519,000 1,740,000 1,131,000 1 070,000 960,000 5,000 7,275,000 12 1,825,000 0 636,000 1,474,000 552,000 1,030,000 306,000 0 5,823,000 13 2,227,000 0 33,000 1,513,000 791,000 1,145,000 464,000 408,000 6,581,000 14 1,462,000 0 39,000 1,570,000 1,196,000 923,000 1,097,000 841,000 7,128,000 15 1,877,000 0 0 1,608,000 1,145,000 1,275,000 1,202,000 729,000 7,836,000 16 1,902,000 0 0 1,630,000 731,000 1,258,000 787,000 853,000 7,161,000 17 2,254,000 0 0 1,709,000 1,086,000 1,422,000 1,136,000 1,205,000 8,812,000 18 1,572,000 0 0 1,776,000 1,158,000 1,095,000 879,000 879,000 7,359,000 19 2,166,000 0 0 1,592,000 643,000 1,102,000 367,000 76,000 5,946,000 20 1,613,000 0 0 1,193,000 677,000 894,000 438,000 116,000 4,931,000 21 2,123,000 0 0 1,564,000 1,284,000 1,552,000 1,042,000 162,000 7,727,000 22 1,763,000 0 0 1,743,000 1,243,000 1,295,000 1,034,000 31,000 7,109,000 23 1,948,000 0 0 1,580,000 1,328,000 1,423,000 890,000 97,000 7,266,000 24 2,215,000 0 0 1,622,000 1,466,000 1,599,000 1,050,000 158,000 8,110,000 25 1,772,000 0 0 1,673,000 871,000 1,067,000 713,000 43,000 6,139,000 26 1,960,000 0 0 1,548,000 1,000 194,000 1,000 0 3,704,000 27 1,922,000 0 0 1,477,000 602,000 804,000 608,000 18,000 5,431,000 28 2,046,000 0 0 1,689,000 1,336,000 1,461 ,000 1,012,000 46,000 7,590,000 29 2,053,000 0 0 1,559,000 1,180,000 1,489,000 917,000 27,000 7,225,000 30 2,038,000 0 0 1,919,000 1,198,000 1,391,000 803,000 6,000 7,355,000 31 1,923,000 0 0 1,498,000 1,129,000 1,389,000 826,000 24,000 6,789,000 TOTALS 48,601,000 13,540,000 6,632,000 50,223,000 26,130,000 37,687,000 24,164,000 6,931,000 213,908,000

Page 278 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
NOVEMBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,981,000 well well 1,454,000 284,000 991,000 460,000 0 5,170,000 2 1,880,000 1,177,000 0 48,000 1,000 0 3
,106,000
3 990,000 1,492,000 179,000 1,466,000 581,000 17,000 4,725,000 4 2,000,000 1,878,000 906,000 1,400,000 741,000 33,000
6,958,000
5 1,964,000 1,491,000 1,078,000 1,461,000 31,000 13,000 6,038,000 6 2,090,000 1,797,000 1,145,000 1,445,000 372,000 48,000 6,897,000 7 2,087,000 1,671,000 1,305,000 1,549,000 420,000 6,000 7,038,000
8 1,977,000 1,688,000 625,000 957,000 152,000 0 5,399,000 9 7,000 is is 1,576,000 193,000 1,374,000 5,000 0 3,155,000 10 1,027,000 1,696,000 955,000 1,415,000 7,000 0 5,100,000 11 1,199,000 1,755,000 837,000 1,472,000 38
,000 77,000 5,378,000
12 1,220,000 1,580,000 601,000 1,317,000 5,000 0 4,723,000 13 2,069,000 1,657,000 1,322,000 1,551
,000 5,000 16,000 6,620,000
14 2,198,000 1,842,000 1,209,000 1,456,000 46,000 6,000 6,757,000 15 1,687,000 1,796,000 488,000 1,401,000 101,000 401,000 5,874,000 16 0 1,511,000 279,000 1,294,000 1,000 122
,000 3,207,000
17 954,000 1,652,000 562,000 1,326,000 0 0 4,494,000
18 2,042,000 off off 1,582,000 1,057,000 1,518,000 0 0 6,199,000 19 1,911,000 1,695,000 1,029,000 1,328,000 0 5,000 5,968,000 20 2,039,000 1,810,000 1,096
,000 1,449,000 0 17,000 6,411,000
21 2,114,000 1,619,000 961,000 1,534,000 0 0 6,228
,000
22 2,032,000 1,322,000 372,000 818,000 0 0 4,544,000
23 493,000 1,089,000 14,000 617,000 10,000 1,000 2,224,000 24 896,000 1,318,000 368,000 1,170,000 5,000 0 3
,757,000
25 1,605,000 1,697,000 1,080,000 1,434,000 3,000 248,000 6,067,000 26 1,940,000 1,736,000 1,176,000 1,588,000 1,000 347,000 6,788,000
27 1,460,000 1,602,000 693,000 1,259,000 0 15,000 5,029,000 28 935,000 1,769,000 545,000 1,312,000 120,000 24,000 4,705,000 29 1,947,000 line line 1,587,000 514,000 1,375,000 0 33,000 5,456,000 30 875,000 1,576,000 218,000 1,280,000 0 0 3
,949,000
TOTALS 45,619,000 0 0 48,115,000 21,091,000 38,605
,000 3,105,000 1,429
,000 157,964,000

Page 279 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2014
DECEMBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 0 1,712,000 845,000 875,000 1,000 6,000 3,439,000
2 0 1,551,000 1,343,000 1,433,000 0 4,000 4,331,000
3 297,000 1,821,000 1,219,000 1,494,000 48,000 43,000 4,922,000 4 0 1,939,000 1,344,000 1,501,000 0 0 4,784,000
5 0 well well 1,679,000 1,454,000 1,493,000 0 30,000 4,656,000 6 0 1,728,000 1,388,000 1,522,000 0 0 4,638,000
7 0 1,529,000 575,000 1,379,000 0 318,000 3,801,000
8 0 1,623,000 613,000 1,367,000 0 0 3,603,000
9 0 1,453,000 1,100,000 1,616,000 19,000 0 4,188,000
10 0 is is 1,680,000 351,000 1,329,000 831,000 91,000 4,282,000 11 0 1,627,000 0 1,452,000 1,176,000 385,000 4,640,000
12 0 1,665,000 282,000 1,540,000 1,191,000 78,000 4,756,000 13 1,463,000 1,958,000 1,189,000 638,000 137,000 5,000 5,390,000 14 582,000 1,333,000 498,000 1,272,000 35,000 1,000 3,721,000 15 0 1,618,000 45,000 1,314,000 517,000 90,000 3,584,000 16 1,633,000 1,623,000 726,000 1,252,000 498,000 102,000 5,834,000 17 1,697,000 1,691,000 1,315,000 1,251,000 1,000 0 5,955,000 18 1,732,000 1,712,000 1,282,000 1,309,000 0 70,000 6,105,000 19 1,649,000 1,774,000 1,440,000 1,385,000 2,000 6,000 6,256,000 20 874,000 off off 1,610,000 571,000 1,000,000 10,000 63,000 4,128,000 21 0 1,219,000 0 512,000 1,000 0 1,732,000
22 687,000 1,629,000 844,000 1,156,000 1,000 0 4,317,000 23 1,520,000 1,856,000 1,438,000 1,493,000 6,000 236,000 6,549,000 24 1,738,000 1,639,000 1,170,000 1,515,000 0 6,000 6,068,000 25 505,000 1,754,000 661,000 1,173,000 0 5,000 4,098,000 26 899,000 1,686,000 552,000 1,435,000 0 9,000 4,581,000 27 1,670,000 line line 1,494,000 931,000 1,297,000 0 1,000 5,393,000 28 818,000 1,846,000 885,000 1,196,000 29,000 104,000 4,878,000 29 635,000 1,456,000 540,000 1,287,000 6,000 5,000 3,929,000 30 1,745,000 1,727,000 1,038,000 1,513,000 0 0 6,023,000 31 1,778,000 1,806,000 999,000 1,625,000 146,000 75,000 6,429,000 TOTALS 21,922,000 0 0 51,438,000 26,638,000 40,624,000 4,655,000 1,733,000 147,010,000

Page 280 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
2013
WELL# 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
JANUARY 51,658,000 41,890,000 20,400,000 40,688,000 0 12,220,000 29,000 0 166,885,000 FEBRUARY 42,188,000 37,559,000 14,669,000 44,975,000 0 13,277,000 33,000 0 152,701,000 MARCH 52,090,000 41,815,000 11,964,000 53,108,000 5,249,000 29,423,000 63,000 0 193,712,000 APRIL 47,737,000 39,644,000 13,261,000 50,052,000 10,396,000 32,817,000 4,362,000 0 198,269,000 MAY 40,762,000 43,698,000 19,163,000 56,749,000 20,159,000 36,615,000 8,161,000 0 225,307,000 JUNE 28,815,000 46,573,000 19,987,000 54,252,000 29,690,000 33,818,000 13,880,000 0 227,015,000 JULY 47,921,000 48,900,000 19,455,000 55,743,000 31,476,000 34,607,000 14,674,000 0 252,776,000 AUGUST 49,156,000 43,979,000 21,798,000 55,354,000 33,278,000 38,105,000 13,583,000 0 255,253,000 SEPTEMBEF 50,184,000 38,825,000 17,215,000 51,562,000 18,475,000 36,845,000 4,298,000 0 217,404,000 OCTOBER 52,595,000 45,392,000 22,796,000 47,365,000 16,524,000 38,342,000 271,000 0 223,285,000 NOVEMBER 52,494,000 40,324,000 18,502,000 42,531,000 493,000 36,029,000 392,000 0 190,765,000 DECEMBER 54,580,000 32,715,000 15,916,000 42,617,000 2,104,000 29,313,000 263,000 0 177,508,000 bTALSfin aa 570,180,000 501,314,000 215,126,000 594,996,000 167,844,000 371,411,000 60,009,000 0 2,480,880,000

Page 281 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
2013 Wells
Januarv 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,245,000 0 411,000 1,406,000 0 1,188,000 0 0 4,250,000 2 896,000 92,000 435,000 1,427,000 0 1,320,000 0 0 4,170,000 3 1,885,000 1,785,000 829,000
1,680,000 0
5,000 7,000 0 6,191,000
4 1,905,000 1,823,000 1,196,000 1,863,000 0
6,000 0 0 6,793,000
5 1,887,000 1,802,000 639,000 1,645,000 0 35,000 0 0 6,008,000 6 1,877,000 1,144,000 380,000 1,330,000 0 0 0 0 4,731,000 7 1,798,000 379,000 309,000 1,603,000 0 20,000 0 0 4,109,000 8 1,835,000 1,679,000 656,000 1,580,000 0 0 0 0 5,750,000 9 1,857,000 1,977,000 818,000
1,612,000 0 25,000 17,000 0 6
,306,000
10 1,819,000 1,638,000 902,000 1,615,000 0 76
,000 5,000 0 6
,055,000
11 1,855,000 1,815,000 881,000 1,649,000 0 5,000 0 0 6
,205,000
12 1,913,000 1,812,000 918,000 1,698
,000 0 0 0 0 6,341,000
13 1,387,000 641,000 89,000 1,201
,000 0 0 0 0 3,318,000
14 1,470,000 117,000 19,000 980,000 0 23,000 0 0 2,609,000 15 2,109,000 1,947,000 1,134,000 1,689,000 0 1,000 0 0 6,880,000 16 1,819,000 1,756,000 986,000 1,786,000 0 3,000 0 0 6,350,000 17 1,902,000 1,817,000 1,050,000 1,736,000 0 43,000 0 0 6,548,000 18 2,050,000 2,095,000 1,232,000 1,776,000 0 674,000 0 0 7,827,000
19 1,649,000 1,640,000 532
,000 1,005,000 0 909,000 0 0 5,
735,000
20 1,066,000 459,000 0 1,038,000 0 335,000 0 0 2,898,000 21 476,000 326,000 103,000 1,276,000 0 829,000 0 0 3
,010,000
22 1,686,000 1,652,000 712,000 247,000 0 1,176,000 0 0 5,473,000 23 1,821,000 1,808,000 822,000 173,000 0 1,310,000 0 0
5,934,000
24 1,953,000 1,855,000 874,000 47,000 0 1,438,000 0 0 6 ,167,000
25 1,817,000 1,793,000 904,000 40,000 0 1,297
,000 0 0 5
,851,000
26 1,812,000 1,737,000 812,000 1,488,000 0 98,000 0 0 5,947 ,000
27 1,840,000 651,000 114,000
1,347,000 0 53,000 0 0 4,005
,000
28 232,000 202,000 89
,000
1,009,000 0 902,0
00 0 0 2,434
,000
29 1,994,000 1,782,000 810,000 1,647,000 0 13,000 0 0 6 ,246,000
30 1,920,000 1,840,000 945,000 1,593,000 0 22,000 0 0 6,320 ,000
31 1,883,000 1,826,000 799,000 1,502,000 0 414,000 0 0 6,424,000 TOTALS 51,658,000 41,890,000 20,400,000 40,688,000 0 12,220,000 29 ,000 0 166,885,000

Page 282 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
Februarv 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,864,000 1,622,000 717,000 1,762,000 0 626,000 0 0 6,591,000 2 2,030,000 1,939,000 812,000 1,659,000 0 212,000 0 0 6,652,000 3 1,097,000 511,000 4,000 1,381,000 0 180,000 0 0 3,173,000 4 148,000 148,000 30,000 954,000 0 866,000 0 0 2,146,000 5 2,061,000 1,888,000 1,008,000 1,751,000 0 0 0 0 6,708,000 6 1,866,000 1,850,000 936,000 1,636,000 0 452,000 6,000 0 6,746,000 7 1,832,000 1,713,000 765,000 1,426,000 0 111,000 0 0 5,847,000 8 1,846,000 1,794,000 417,000 1,620,000 0 591,000 0 0 6,268,000 9 2,043,000 1,961,000 841,000 1,683,000 0 0 0 0 6,528,000 10 746,000 303,000 0 1,384,000 0 320,000 0 0 2,753,000
11 315,000 189,000 29,000 1,349,000 0 780,000 0 0 2,662,000 12 1,965,000 1,886,000 717,000 1,922,000 0 34,000 0 0 6,524,000 13 1,746,000 1,667,000 68,000 1,312,000 0 1,249,000 0 0 6,042,000 14 1,836,000 1,757,000 434,000 1,722,000 0 615,000 0 0 6,364,000 15 1,913,000 1,862,000 601,000 1,661,000 0 791,000 0 0 6,828,000 16 1,835,000 1,777,000 546,000 1,938,000 0 598,000 0 0 6,694,000 17 1,122,000 852,000 340,000 1,699,000 0 14,000 0 0 4,027,000 18 613,000 6,000 1,000 1,471,000 0 1,079,000 0 0 3,170,000 19 880,000 606,000 426,000 1,582,000 0 957,000 0 0 4,451,000 20 1,811,000 1,756,000 780,000 1,896,000 0 135,000 27,000 0 6,405,000 21 1,844,000 1,768,000 845,000 1,866,000 0 3,000 0 0 6,326,000 22 1,895,000 1,834,000 887,000 1,953,000 0 17,000 0 0 6,586,000 23 2,001,000 1,889,000 912,000 2,056,000 0 51,000 0 0 6,909,000 24 810,000 392,000 33,000 1,465,000 0 504,000 0 0 3,204,000 25 656,000 283,000 63,000 1,282,000 0 805,000 0 0 3,089,000 26 1,860,000 1,784,000 849,000 1,583,000 0 636,000 0 0 6,712,000 27 1,817,000 1,759,000 960,000 1,517,000 0 434,000 0 0 6,487,000 28 1,736,000 1,763,000 648,000 1,445,000 0 1,217,000 0 0 6,809,000 29 Totals 42,188,000 37,559,000 14,669,000 44,975,000 0 13,277,000 33,000 0 152,701,000

Page 283 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
MARCH 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,774,000 1,742,000 574,000 1,618,000 0 943
,000 0 0 6,651,000
2 1,776,000 1,794,000 655,000 1,703,000 0 1,110,000 0 0 7,038,000
3 1,326,000 540,000 26,000 1,640,000 0 491,000 0 0 4
,023,000 4 310,000 315,000 45,000 1,413,000 165,000 784,000 0 0 3,032,000 5 1,792,000 1,617,000 623,000 1,713,000 515,000 866,000 0 0 7,126,000 6 1,736,000 1,728,000 731,000 1,697,000 166,000 862,000 12,000 0 6,932,000 7 1,737,000 1,752,000 261,000 1,638,000 0
1,168,000 0 0
6,556,000 8 1,733,000 1,728,000 195,000 1,743,000 0 1,017,000 0 0 6,416,000 9 2,010,000 1,980,000 506,000 1,879,000 0 858,000 0 0 7,233,000 10 1,620,000 428,000 0 1,272,000 0 77,000 0 0 3,397,000 11 1,464,000 134,000 3,000 1,346,000 0 11,000 0 0 2,958,000 12 1,828,000 1,645,000 386,000 1,898,000 0 1,290,000 0 0 7,047,000 13 1,773,000 1,961,000 400,000 1,752,000 201,000 1,344,000 0 0 7,431,000 14 1,705,000 1,491,000 450,000 2,008,000 0 1,155,000 0 0 6,809,000 15 1,800,000 1,797,000 446,000 1,991,000 0 1,239,000 0 0 7,273,000 16 1,889,000 1,899,000 280,000 1,949,000 0
1,276,000 0 0 7,293,000
17 1,680,000 467,000 0 1,502
,000 321,000 403,000 0 0 4,373,000 18 1,532,000 268,000 35,000 1,615,000 0 139,000 0 0 3,589,000 19 1,738,000 1,713,000 536,000 1,622,000 717,000 1,299,000 0 0 7,625,000 20 1,857,000 1,856,000 579,000 1,630,000 604,000
1,287,000 0 0 7,813,000
21 1,553,000 1,634,000 460,000 1,713,000 510,000
1,124,000 0 0 6,994,000
22 1,738,000 1,722,000 635,000 1,610,000 805,000 1,235,000 0 0 7,745,000 23 1,733,000 1,738,000 745,000 1,921,000 0 1,286,000 0 0 7,423,000
24 1,626,000 380,000
5,000 1,666,000 0 698,000 0 0
4,375,000
25 1,523,000 173,000 30,000
1,445,000 0 587,000 0 0 3,758,000
26 1,730,000 1,984,000 466,000 1,803,000 D 1,271,000 0 0 7,254,000 27 1,717,000 1,734,000 523,000 1,779,000 369,000 1,252,000 27,000 0 7,401,000 28 1,623,000 1,752,000 780,000 1,671,000 374,000 1,285,000 6,000 0 7,491,000 29 1,708,000 1,875,000 887,000 1,924,000 0 1,171,000 0 0 7,565,000 30 1,853,000 1,655,000 699,000 2,076,000 391,000 1,385,000 14,000 0 8,073 ,000
31 2,206,000 313,000 3,000 1,871,000 111,000 510,000
4,000 0 5,018,000
TOTALS 52,090,000 41,815,000 11,964,000 53,108,000 5,249,000 29,423,000 63,000 0 193 ,712,000

Page 284 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
APRIL 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 972,000 171,000 13,000 704,000 18.000 150,000 0 0 2,028,000 2 1,633,000 1,687,000 160,000 1,718,000 801 000 1,041,000 0 0 7,040,000 3 1,691,000 1,699,000 370,000 1,674,000 584,000 1,131,000 0 0 7,149,000 4 1,763,000 1,770,000 515,000 1,864,000 0 1,299,000 0 0 7,211,000 5 1,761,000 1,789,000 56,000 1,688,000 0 1,260,000 0 0 6,554,000 6 1,709,000 1,707,000 56,000 1,915,000 173,000 1,257,000 0 0 6,817,000 7 940,000 57,000 0 1,578,000 0 1,092,000 5,000 0 3,672,000 8 759,000 124,000 35,000 1,307,000 293,000 728,000 0 0 3,246,000 9 1,824,000 1,776,000 215,000 1,661,000 460,000 1,318,000 0 0 7,254,000 10 1,783,000 1,761,000 581,000 1,728,000 385,000 1,335,000 2,000 0 7,575,000 11 1,784,000 1,763,000 996,000 1,860,000 0 1,360,000 196,000 0 7,959,000 12 1,669,000 1,720,000 863,000 1,945,000 0 1,292,000 244,000 0 7,733,000 13 1,853,000 1,934,000 965,000 2,048,000 0 1,418,000 301,000 0 8,519,000 14 1,268,000 378,000 0 1,192,000 0 647,000 8,000 0 3,493,000 15 1,706,000 169,000 51,000 1,677,000 0 519,000 0 0 4,122,000 16 1,647,000 1,691,000 769,000 1,801,000 0 1,228,000 60,000 0 7,196,000 17 1,655,000 1,734,000 776,000 1,839,000 185,000 1,170,000 46,000 0 7,405,000 18 1,658,000 1,709,000 745,000 1,777,000 317,000 1,201,000 144,000 0 7,551,000 19 1,831,000 1,934,000 868,000 1,834,000 110,000 1,438,000 653,000 0 8,668,000 20 1,686,000 1,660,000 859,000 1,937,000 44,000 1,284,000 392,000 0 7,862,000 21 1,539,000 660,000 0 1,790,000 0 661,000 78,000 0 4,728,000 22 1,508,000 114,000 65,000 1,662,000 1,000 863,000 157,000 0 4,370,000 23 1 741 000 1866000 907 000 1.936 000 93.000 1.222.000 513 000 0 8 278 000 24 1,590,000 1,671,000 762,000 1,967,000 160,000 1,314,000 475,000 0 7,939,000 25 1,561,000 1,636,000 846,000 1,828,000 187,000 1,210,000 597,000 0 7,865,000 26 1,837,000 1,923,000 873,000 1,825,000 448,000 1,342,000 313,000 0 8,561,000 27 1,541,000 1,602,000 253,000 2,037,000 1,416,000 1,229,000 32,000 0 8,110,000 28 1,579,000 1,014,000 2,000 1,179,000 1,313,000 422,000 0 0 5,509,000 29 1,657,000 251,000 9,000 335,000 1.972,000 1,175,000 6,000 0 5,405,000 30 1,592,000 1,674,000 651,000 1,746,000 1,436,000 1,211,000 140,000 0 8,450,000 31 TOTALS 47,737,000 39,644,000 13,261,000 50,052,000 10,396,000 32,817,000 4,362,000 0 198,269,000

Page 285 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
MAY 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,550,000 1,629,000 276,000 1,849,000 1,386,000 1,108,000 150,000 0 7,948,000 2 1,591,000 1,687,000 553,000 1,777,000 1,390,000 1,260,000 233,000 0 8,491,000 3 1,619,000 1,725,000 898,000 1,892,000 1,147,000 1,274,000 563,000 0 9,118,000 4 1,681,000 1,787,000 906,000 1,985,000 1,414,000 1,331,000 220,000 0 9,324,000 5 1,614,000 906,000 0 1,805,000 31,000 1,195,000 181,000 0 5,732,000 6 1,243,000 155,000 50,000 1,385,000 0 758,000 82,000 0 3,673,000 7 1,607,000 1,679,000 878,000 1,833,000 111,000 1,243,000 664,000 0 8,015,000 8 1,637,000 1,728,000 811,000 2,004,000 119,000 1,225,000 166,000 0 7,690,000 9 1,652,000 1,706,000 924,000 1,754,000 94,000 1,278,000 498,000 0 7,906,000 10 1,654,000 1,761,000 972,000 1,956,000 534,000 1,293,000 738,000 0 8,908,000 11 1,559,000 1,982,000 847,000 1,874,000 392,000 1,220,000 419,000 0 8,293,000 12 1,664,000 631,000 8,000 1,936,000
5,000 1,196,000 189,000 0 5,629,000
13 1,429,000 186,000 48,000 1,815,000 75,000 952,000 277,000 0 4,782,000 14 1,636,000 1,705,000 837,000 1,805,000 495,000 1,267,000 778,000 0 8,523 ,000
15 1,616,000 1,691,000 825,000 2,027,000 269,000 1,291,000 795,000 0 8,514,000 16 1,566,000 1,648,000 804,000 1,850,000 829,000 1,209,000 261,000 0 8,167,000 17 1,620,000 1,704,000 811,000 1,976,000 997,000 1,252,000 13,000 0 8,373 ,000
18 1,743,000 1,758,000 687,000 1,802,000 744,000 1,263,000 51,000 0 8,048,000 19 1,566,000 849,000 83,000 1,542,000 376,000 1,117,000 13,000 0 5,546,000 20 1,297,000 190,000 65,000 1,808,000 376,000 806,000 62,000 0 4,604,000 21 1,722,000 1,743,000 946,000 1,685,000 1,080,000 1,333,000 305,000 0 8,814,000 22 1,519,000 1,671,000 932,000 2,045,000 1,209,000 1,120,000 136,000 0 8,632,000 23 1,523,000 1,642,000 894,000 1,870,000 1,096,000 1,226,000 100,000 0 8,351,000 24 1,622,000 1,662,000 842,000 1,786,000 1,206,000 1,257,000 90,000 0 8,465,000 25 1,613,000 1,808,000 896,000 1,898,000 915,000 1,252,000 445,000 0 8,827 ,000
26 1,219,000 1,647,000 107,000 1,810,000 5,000 878,000 10,000 0 5,676,000 27 328,000 0 1,607,000 0 999,000 53,000 0 2,987,000
28 flow meter 827,000 412,000 1,867,000 411,000
1,062,000 16
,000 0 4,595,000
29 broken 1,747,000 951,000 1,738,000 719,000 1,213,000 117,000 0 6,485,000 30 1,670,000 894,000 1,878,000 1,213,000
1,341,000 67,000 0
7,063,000
31 1,846,000 1,006,000 1,890,000 1,521,000 1,396,000 469,000 0 8,128,000 TOTALS 40,762,000 43,698,000 19,163,000 56,749,000 20,159,000 36,615,000 8,161,000 0 225,307,000

Page 286 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
JUNE 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 flow 1,544,000 808,000 1,916,000 1,357,000 1,040,000 369,000 0 7,034,000 2 meter 1,168,000 95,000 1,832,000 293,000 1,119,000 23,000 0 4,530,000 3 not 792,000 91,000 1,875,000 714,000 837,000 80,000 0 4,389,000 4 working 1,663,000 856,000 1,659,000 901,000 1,235,000 882,000 0 7,196,000 5 " " .. 1,753,000 930,000 1,779,000 823,000 1,301,000 738,000 0 7,324,000 6 " " .. 1,661,000 879,000 2,068,000 1,392,000 1,225,000 333,000 0 7,558,000 7 " .. .. 1,671,000 870,000 1,792,000 1,482,000 1,198,000 834,000 0 7,847,000 8 " .. " 1,794,000 918,000 1,891,000 1,505,000 1,353,000 654,000 0 8,115,000 9 " .. " 1,558,000 173,000 1,713,000 425,000 956,000 60,000 0 4,885,000 10 .. .. " 1,436,000 64,000 1,502,000 1,176,000 337,000 55,000 0 4,570,000 11 1,266,000 1,614,000 905,000 1,785,000 59,000 1,185,000 561,000 0 7,375,000 12 1,467,000 1,657,000 810,000 1,942,000 1,372,000 1,228,000 390,000 0 8,866,000 13 1,749,000 1,922,000 1,019,000 1,980,000 1,535,000 1,506,000 448,000 0 10,159,000 14 1,495,000 1,586,000 846,000 1,654,000 1,256,000 1,246,000 535,000 0 8,618,000 15 1,239,000 1,493,000 777,000 1,857,000 1,439,000 1,029,000 373,000 0 8,207,000 16 1,294,000 1,661,000 562,000 1,860,000 641,000 1,032,000 377 ,000 0 7,427,000
17 · 1,425,000 648,000 78,000 1,909,000 362,000 858,000 27,000 0 5,307,000 18 1,766,000 1,958,000 1,029,000 1,506,000 1,300,000 1,480,000 901 ,000 0 9,940,000
19 1,237,000 1,377,000 675,000 1,960,000 1,209,000 1,049,000 128,000 0 7,635,000 20 1,432,000 1,601,000 795,000 1,808,000 904,000 1,236,000 605,000 0 8,381,000 21 1,603,000 1,721,000 904,000 1,527,000 1,060,000 1,391,000 783,000 0 8,989,000 22 1,339,000 1,556,000 801,000 1,839,000 1,141,000 1,108,000 909,000 0 8,693,000 23 1,491,000 1,755,000 250,000 1,996,000 243,000 1,061,000 31,000 0 6,827,000 24 1,212,000 1,131,000 22,000 1,616,000 190,000 594,000 8,000 0 4,773,000 25 1,457,000 1,654,000 ·911,000 1,749,000 376,000 1,290,000 623,000 0 8,060,000 26 1,483,000 1,570,000 829,000 1,890,000 1,111,000 1,126,000 521,000 0 8,530,000 27 1,487,000 1,641,000 863,000 1,848,000 1,448,000 1,235,000 619,000 0 9,141,000 28 1,660,000 1,825,000 969,000 1,786,000 1,489,000 1,347,000 807,000 0 9,883,000 29 1,520,000 1,640,000 842,000 1,900,000 1,783,000 1,162,000 901,000 0 9,748,000 30 1,193,000 1,523,000 416,000 1,813,000 704,000 1,054,000 305,000 0 7,008,000 TOTALS 28,815,000 46,573,000 19,987,000 54,252,000 29,690,000 33,818,000 13,880,000 0 227,015,000

Page 287 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
JULY 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,424,000 1,497,000 398,000 1,695,000 976,000 1,013,000 242,000 0 7,245,000 2 1,550,000 1,638,000 857,000 1,831,000 1,321,000 1,280,000 1,125,000 0 9,602,000 3 1,415,000 1,560,000 826,000 1,864,000 1,568,000 1,193,000 794,000 0 9,220,000 4 1,491,000 1,626,000 564,000 1,882,000 1,210,000 1,228,000 393,000 0 8,394,000 5 1,483,000 1,593,000 414,000 1,770,000 1,005,000 1,034,000 254,000 0 7,553,000 6 1,524,000 1,645,000 809,000 1,856,000 1,283,000 1,268,000 798,000 0 9,183,000 7 1,398,000 1,503,000 201,000 1,800,000 215,000 944,000 68,000 0 6,129,000 8 1,425,000 1,578,000 68,000 1,613,000 204,000 574,000 4,000 0 5,466,000 9 1,789,000 1,801,000 822,000 1,857,000 1,460,000 1,376,000 616,000 0 9,721,000 10 1,440,000 1,461,000 870,000 1,943,000 1,291,000 1,126,000 894,000 0 9,025,000 11 1,617,000 1,629,000 843,000 1,708,000 1,341,000 1,291,000 472,000 0 8,901,000 12 1,617,000 1,633,000 857,000 1,921,000 1,437,000 1,277,000 908,000 0 9,650,000 13 1,725,000 1,760,000 905,000 1,893,000 1,116,000 1,430,000 884,000 0 9,713,000 14 1,606,000 1,674,000 138,000 1,715,000 389,000 1,003,000 1,000 0 6,526,000 15 1,143,000 1,285,000 71,000 1,496,000 201,000 362,000 125,000 0 4,683,000 16 1,666,000 1,691,000 878,000 1,879,000 1,368,000 1,270,000 727,000 0 9,479,000 17 1,628,000 1,612,000 844,000 1,677,000 879,000 1,335,000 683,000 D 8,658,000 18 1,537,000 1,582,000 843,000 1,877,000 1,217,000 1,190,000 641,000 0 8,887,000 19 1,612,000 1,654,000 877,000 1,884,000 1,358,000 1,252,000 901,000 0 9,538,000 20 1,636,000 1,638,000 860,000 1,810,000 1,269,000 1,278,000 723,000 0 9,214,000 21 1,511,000 1,605,000 201,000 1,822,000 272,000 872,000 116,000 0 6,399,000 22 1,408,000 1,518,000 21,000 1,724,000 325,000 451,000 27,000 0 5,474,000 23 1,648,000 1,686,000 897,000 1,648,000 1,246,000 1,166,000 560,000 0 8,851,000 24 1,524,000 1,604,000 836,000 1,925,000 1,167,000 1,293,000 392,000 0 8,741,000 25 1,574,000 1,582,000 829,000 1,758,000 1,250,000 1,213,000 561,000 0 8,767,000 26 1,723,000 1,747,000 897,000 1,759,000 1,187,000 1,341,000 813,000 D 9,467,000 27 1,635,000 1,662,000 847,000 2,048,000 1,406,000 1,340,000 650,000 0 9,588,000 28 1,583,000 1,696,000" 173,000 1,786,000 234,000 832,000 0 0 6,304,000 29 1,342,000 418,000 35,000 1,672,000 500,000 800,000 3,000 0 . 4,770,000 30 1,733,000 1,765,000 923,000 1,731,000 1,366,000 1,386,000 159,000 0 9,063,000 31 1,514,000 1,557,000 851,000 1,899,000 1,415,000 1,189,000 140,000 0 8,565,000 TOTALS 47,921,000 48,900,0DO 19,455,000 55,743,000 31,476,000 34,607,000 14,674,000 0 252,776,000

Page 288 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
AUGUST 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,624,000 1,679,000 868,000 1,841,000 1,563,000 1,273,000 289,000 0 9,137,000 2 1,661,000 1,716,000 949,000 2,071,000 1,533,000 1,295,000 703,000 0 9,928,000 3 1,653,000 1,685,000 834,000 1,695,000 1,290,000 1,318,000 594,000 0 9,069,000 4 1,451,000 954,000 193,000 1,694,000 321,000 1,077,000 14,000 0 5,704,000 5 1,842,000 466,000 174,000 1,793,000 666,000 1,277,000 17,000 0 6,235,000 6 7
1,816,000 1,867,000 980,000 1,809,000 945,000 1,396,000 636,000 0 9,449,000 1,191,000 1,291,000 679,000 1,878,000 957,000 1,013,000 534,000 0 7,543,000 8 1,632,000 1,596,000 835,000 1,811,000 1,406,000 1,224,000 358,000 0 8,862,000 9 1,558,000 1,713,000 974,000 2,081,000 1,897,000 1,337,000 375,000 0 9,935,000 11 10 1,683,000 1,640,000 799,000 1,707,000 1,487,000 1,272,000 122,000 0 8,710,000 1,500,000 1,197,000 390,000 1,757,000 560,000 1,050,000 0 0 6,454,000 12 1,564,000 312,000 122,000 1,754,000 387,000 1,073,000 4,000 0 5,216,000 13 1,700,000 1,787,000 931,000 1,805,000 1,628,000 1,437,000 428,000 0 9,716,000 14 1,353,000 1,441,000 739,000 1,881,000 1,258,000 1,045,000 457,000 0 8,174,000 15 1,526,000 1,657,000 883,000 1,950,000 1,423,000 1,242,000 595,000 0 9,276,000 17 16 1,745,000 1,829,000 949,000 1,690,000 1,149,000 1,296,000 942,000 0 9,600,000 1,588,000 1,651 000 875,000 1,890,000 1,490,000 1,170,000 619,000 0 9,283,000 18 1,391,000 1,065,000 212,000 1,683,000 47,000 1,100,000 0 0 5,498,000 19 1,581,000 251,000 91,000 1,969,000 498,000 1,124,000 32,000 0 5,546,000 20 1,722,000 1,778,000 895,000 1,775,000 1,283,000 1,289,000 620,000 0 9,362,000 21 1,519 000 1 582,000 811,000 1,974,000 1,170,000 1,319,000 680,000 0 9,055,000 22 1,593,000 1,718,000 886,000 1,740,000 1,362,000 1,308,000 821,000 0 9,428,000 23 1,510,000 1,617,000 789,000 1,718,000 1,156,000 1,208,000 697,000 0 8,695,000 24 25
1,572,000 1,693,000 852,000 1,876,000 1,345,000 1,266,000 736,000 0 9,340,000 1,733,000 962,000 520,000 2,034,000 376,000 1,347,000 123,000 0 7,095,000 26 27
1,337,000 233,000 56,000 159,000 339,000 847,000 71,000 0 3,042,000 1,547,000 1,663,000 840,000 1,853,000 1,335,000 1,236,000 435,000 0 8,909,000 28 1',579,000 1,688,000 952,000 1,732,000 950,000 1,276,000 569,000 0 8,746,000 29 1,621,000 1 734,000 877,000 1,884,000 1,011,000 1,295,000 730,000 0 9,152,000 30 1,746,000 1',772,000 939,000 1,697,000 1,192,000 1,341,000 521,000 0 9,208,000 TOTALS
31 1,618 000 1,742,000 904,000 2,153,000 1,254,000 1,354,000 861,000 0 9,886,000 49,156,000 43,979,000 21,798,000 55,354,000 33,278,000 38,105,000 13,583,000 0 255,253,000

Page 289 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
SEPTEMBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,672,000 1,123,000 434,000 1,660,000 532,000 1,105,000 295,000 0 6,821,000 2 1,514,000 0 0 1,698,000 202,000 772,000 5,000 0 4,191 ,000 3 1,658,000 881,000 411,000 1,817,000 704,000 1,200,000 145,000 0 6,816,000 4 1,565,000 1,644,000 839,000 1,893,000 1,000,000 1,288,000 379,000 0 8,608,000 5 1,817,000 1,841,000 919,000 1,837,000 1,068,000 1,335,000 145,000 0 8,962,000 6 1,660,000 1,672,000 850,000 2,042,000 742,000 1,354,000 626,000 0 8,946 000 1 1,707,000 1,797,000 925,000 1,856,000 919,000 1,435,000 456,000 0 9,095,000 8 1,686,000 1,074,000 101,000 1,900,000 9,000 1,181,000 46,000 0 5,997,000 9 1,430,000 198,000 34,000 1,592,000 255,000 800,000 10,000 0 4,319,000 10 1,870,000 1,930,000 984,000 2,087,000 721,000 1,412,000 689,000 0 9,693,000 11 1,811,000 1,666,000 906,000 1,610,000 511,000 1,491,000 600,000 0 8,595,000 12 1,661,000 1,809,000 845,000 1,855,000 990,000 1,312,000 91,000 0 8,563,000 13 1,725,000 1,795,000 967,000 1,848,000 839,000 1,362,000 595,000 0 9,131,000 14 1,572,000 1,599,000 815,000 2,056,000 1,217,000 1,245,000 4,000 0 8,508,000 15 1,586,000 507,000 410,000 1,758,000 351,000 1,233,000 16,000 0 5,861,000 16 1,665,000 287,000 87,000 1,925 000 191,000 660,000 9,000 0 4,824,000 17 1,940,000 1,905,000 1,027,000 1,758,000 949,000 1,507,000 6,000 0 9,092,000 18 1,473,000 1,509,000 737,000 1,898,000 934,000 1,172,000 3,000 0 7,726,000 19 1,690,000 1,726,000 903,000 1,815,000 905,000 1,349,000 3,000 0 8,391,000 20 1,763,000 1,832,000 966,000 2,034,000 1,156,000 1,411,000 12,000 0 9,174,000 21 2,002,000 1,640 000 786,000 2,115,000 388,000 1,587,000 25,000 0 8,543,000 22 1,827,000 0 318,000 1,613,000 20,000 933,000 18,000 0 4,729,000 23 1,244,000 258,000 17,000 1,787,000 2,000 696,000 4,000 0 4,008,000 24 1,677,000 1,768,000 246,000 1,267,000 153,000 1,305,000 14,000 0 6,430,000 25 1,759,000 1,790,000 0 1,269,000 240,000 1,353,000 16,000 0 6,427,000 26 1,568,000 1,642,000 129,000 1,043,000 526,000 1,232,000 0 0 6.140,000 27 1,726,000 1,805,000 959,000 1,596,000 1 410,000 1,347,000 4,000 0 8,847,000 28 1,607,000 1,671,000 868,000 1,554,000 990,000 1,282,000 1,000 0 7,973,000 29 1,693,000 604,000 344,000 1,248,000 248,000 1,308,000 0 0 5,445,000 30 1,616,000 852,000 388,000 1,131,000 303,000 1,178,000 81,000 0 5,549,000 TOTALS 50,184,000 38,825,000 17,215,000 51,562,000 18 475,000 36,845,000 4 298,000 0 217,404,000

Page 290 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
OCTOBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
1 1,724,000 1,761,000 917,000 1,138,000 1,472
,000 1,371,000 41,000 0 8,424,000 2 1,645,000 1,701,000 904,000 1,502,000 566,000 1,284,000 86,000 0 7,688,000 3 1,697,000 1,747,000 919,000 1,549,000 874,000 1,361,000 20,000 0 8,167,000 4 1,754,000 1,809,000 946,000 1,865,000 874,000 1,395,000 11,000 0 8,654,000 5 1,918,000 1,930,000 876,000 1,663,000 689,000 1,386,000 0 0 8,462,000 6 1,527,000 630,000 0 1,742,000 0 968,000 0 0 4,867,000 7 1,397,000 287,000 66,000 1,829,000 58,000 744,000 0 0 4,381,000 8 1,786,000 1,820,000 923,000 1,557,000 584,000 1,464,000 8,000 0 8,142,000 9 1,597,000 1,643,000 858,000 1,847,000 440,000 1,292,000 3,000 0 7,680,000 10 1,667,000 1,650,000 723,000 1,687,000 158,000 1,208,000 6,000 0 7,099,000 11 1,792,000 1,985,000 842,000 1,913,000 315,000 200,000 3,000 0 7,050,000 12 2,010,000 1,956,000 1,141,000 2,180,000 704,000 1,610,000 10,000 0 9,611,000 13 1,486,000 118,000 340,000 1,385,000 27,000 983,000 0 0 4,339,000 14 1,647,000 443,000 160,000 1,674,000 88,000 432,000 0 0 4,444,000 15 1,552,000 1,913,000 1,016,000 1,411,000 657,000 1,212,000 3,000 0 7,764,000 16 1,672,000 1,403,000 742,000 1,210,000 1,200,000 1,343,000 0 0 7,570,000 17 1,716,000 1,801,000 883,000 1,307,000 1,024,000 1,371,000 0 0 8,102,000 18 1,773,000 1,823,000 963,000 1,456,000 1,340,000 1,417,000 0 0 8,772,000 19 1,670,000 1,736,000 914,000 1,361,000 1,214,000 1,341,000 0 0 8,236,000 20 1,548,000 825,000 587,000 1,226,000 272,000 1,211,000 40,000 0 5,709,000 21 1,556,000 238,000 46,000 1,094,000 30,000 989,000 2,000 0 3 ,955,000 22 1,747,000 1,806,000 967,000 1,570,000 993,000 1,364,000 0 0 8,447,000 23 1,683,000 1,729,000 909,000 1,409,000 590,000 1,361,000 0 0 7,681,000 24 1,657,000 1,721,000 904,000 1,393,000 635,000 1,338,000 0 0 7,648,000 25 1,789,000 1,801,000 926,000 1,467,000 400,000 1,466,000 0 0 7,849,000 26 1,813,000 1,855,000 1,011,000 1,828,000 536,000 1,440,000 0 0 8,483,000 27 1,611,000 1,556,000 342,000 1,179,000 230,000 1,117,000 0 0 6,035,000 28 1,602,000 224,000 95,000 1,230,000 7,000 1,218,000 0 0 4,376,000 29 1,981,000 1,936,000 998,000 1,430,000 181,000 1,595,000 12,000 0 8,133,000 30 1,571,000 1,623,000 867,000 1,762,000 176,000 1,230,000 4,000 0 7,233,000 31 2,007,000 1,922,000 984,000 1,501,000 190,000 1,631,000 22,000 0 8,257,000 TOTALS 52,595
,000 45,392,000 22,769,000 47,365,000 16,524
,000 38,342,000 271,000 0 223,258
,000

Page 291 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013

NOVEMBER
1 1
8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS
2 1,641,000
,567,000 1,650,000 912,000 1,711,000 107,000 1,215,000 56,000 0 7,218,000 3 1
1,798,000 958,000 1,712,000 0 1,468,000 0 0 7,577,000
4 1
,919,000 858,000 197,000 1,250,000 0 1,220,000 0 0 5,444,000 5 1
,997,000 333,000 83,000 1,048,000 0 1,064,000 0 0 4,525,000 6 1,681,000
,994,000 1,746,000 956,000 1,475,000 20,000 1,530,000 9,000 0 7,730,000 7 1,686,000 1,556,000
1,979,000 1,071,000 1,678,000 39,000 1,531,000 320,000 0 8,299,000 8 2
778,000 1,639,000 72,000 1,152,000 6,000 0 6,889,000
9 1,566,000
,107,000 1,798,000 936,000 1,620,000 16,000 1,654,000 0 0 8,131,000 10 1,757,000 1,234,000
1,840 000 945,000 1,877,000 52,000 1,230,000 0 0 7,510,000 11 1,468,000
229 000 1,445,000 1,000 1,117,000 0 0 5,783,000
12 1,879,000
0 0 994,000 0 999,000 0 0 3 461,000
13 1,746,000
963,000 631,000 1,125,000 34,000 1,212,000 0 0 5,844,000 14 1,804,000
1,772,000 747,000 1,618,000 8,000 1,424,000 0 0 7,315,000 15 1
1,894,000 1,026,000 2,011,000 98,000 1,459,000 1,000 0 8 293,000 16 1,869,000 1,876,000
,728,000 1,639,000 853,000 1,668,000 23,000 1,333,000 0 0 7,244,000 17 1,696,000
888,000 1,477,000 17,000 1,388,000 0 0 7,515,000
18 1,540,000
546,000 45,000 1,340,000 1,000 1,282,000 0 0 4,910,000
19 1,756,000
237,000 38,000 1,056,000 0 1,113,000 0 0 3 984,000
20 1,812
1,881,000 985,000 1,700,000 0 1,613,000 0 0 7,935,000
21 1,861,000
,000 1,730,000 908,000 1,342,000 2,000 1,166,000 0 0 6,960,000 22 1
1 862,000 917,000 1,602,000 0 1,404,000 0 0 7,646,000
23 1,705,000 1,746,000
,555,000 1,659,000 849,000 1,138,000 0 1,255,000 0 0 6,456,000 24 1,720,000
751,000 1,457,000 0 1,352,000 0 0 7,011,000
25 1,745,000
189,000 87,000 1,180,000 0 466,000 0 0 3,642,000
26 1,698,000 1,641,000
385,000 72,000 1,068,000 2,000 87,000 0 0 3,359,000
27 1,772,000
736,000 1,310,000 0 1,269,000 0 0 6,654,000
28 1,747,000
1,769,000 769,000 1,161,000 1,000 1,369,000 0 0 6,841,000 29 1,704,000
1,100,000 393,000 1,372,000 0 826,000 0 0 5,438,000
30 1,774,000 1,818,000
825,000 55,000 1,177,000 0 520,000 0 0 4,281,000
TOTALS 52,494,000
687,000 1,280,000 0 1,311,000 0 0 6,870,000
40,324,000 18,502,000 42,531,000 493,000 36,029,000 392,000 0 190,765,000

Page 292 ends

CITY OF LIVINGSTON PRODUCTION REPORTS 2013
DECEMBER 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 TOTALS 1 1,723,000 578,000 0 1,232,000 0 485,000 0 0 4,018,000 2 1,751,000 822,000 161,000 1,409,000 1,000 640,000 1,000 0 4,785,000 3 1,928,000 1,868,000 916 000 1,418,000 0 1,490,000 0 0 7,620,000 4 1,517,000 1,723,000 833,000 1,418,000 23,000 1,137,000 45,000 0 6,696,000 5 1,734,000 1,694,000 872,000 1,265,000 0 1,265,000 0 0 6,830,000 6 1,734,000 1,764,000 799,000 1,431,000 0 1,338,000 0 0 7,066,000 7 1,973,000 1,901,000 611,000 1,574,000 0 1,446,000 0 0 7,505,000 8 1,725,000 376,000 0 1,203,000 0 350,000 1,000 0 3,655,000 9 1,537,000 246,000 0 1,095,000 1,000 50,000 4,000 0 2,933,000 10 1,754,000 1,755,000 688,000 1,300,000 0 1,270,000 0 0 6,767,000 11 1,711,000 1,829,000 627,000 1,300,000 0 1,332,000 0 0 6,799,000 12 1,697,000 1,696,000 574,000 1,333,000 0 1,295,000 0 0 6,595,000 13 1,705,000 1,769,000 677,000 1,337,000 0 1,341,000 0 0 6,829,000 14 1,940,000 1,280.000 402,000 1,604,000 0 853,000 0 0 6,079,000 15 1,655,000 0 0 781,000 0 236,000 0 0 2,672 000 16 1 572,000 153,000 2,000 791,000 0 84,000 0 0 2,602,000 17 1,837,000 1,855,000 1,016,000 1,348,000 0 1,354,000 0 0 7,410,000 18 1,696,000 1,767,000 765,000 1,146,000 0 1,257,000 3,000 0 6,634,000 19 1,759,000 1,805,000 718,000 1,510,000 0 1,202,000 0 0 6,994,000 20 1,698,000 1,754,000 435,000 1,443,000 0 1,194,000 0 0 6,524,000 21 1,788,000 1,672,000 434,000 1,326,000 0 1,212,000 4,000 0 6,436,000 22 1,772,000 564,000 18,000 1,189,000 0 367,000 62,000 0 3,972,000 23 1,547,000 127,000 20,000 921,000 0 36,000 0 0 2,651,000 24 1,932,000 1,972,000 803,000 1,672,000 0 1,084,000 0 0 7,463,000 25 1,581,000 948,000 257,000 914,000 0 464,000 0 0 4,164,000 26 1,678,000 797,000 124,000 1,306,000 0 381,000 4,000 0 4,290,000 27 2,031,000 well 1,070,000 1,903,000 602,000 1 463,000 84,000 0 7,153,000 28 2.021,000 down 1,062,000 1,946,000 540,000 1,524,000 38,000 0 7,131,000 29 1,834,000 for 540,000 1,834,000 311,000 984,000 10,000 0 5,513,000 30 1,752,000 repairs 439,000 1,693,000 11,000 681,000 4,000 0 4,580,000 31 1,998,000 0 1,053,000 1,975,000 615,000 1,498,000 3,000 0 7,142,000 TOTALS 54,580,000 32,715,000 15,916,000 42,617,000 2,104,000 29,313,000 263,000 0 177,508,000

Page 293 ends

APPENDIX2
Metered Water Consumption

Page 294 ends

2. ACTIVE SERVICE CONNECTIONS 1,000,000
CUSTOMER ClASS I r v ' ""'-" nn, "" I RECYCLED WATER .. ---- 1· ·····------ METERED I UNMETEREO I 350.00 isFR 30000
[MFR
ICOMM/INST 25000
!INDUSTRIAL
!LANDSCAPE IRR 331 200.00
iOTR sl
IAGIRR 1S0.00
TOTAL J,592
10000
5000

0.00 l

4. METERED WATER - DELIVERIES-UNITS - --- -- ---- .. OF DELIVERY MG ···- 2023
---- O!:C2022 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY
A. SFR 30.29 24.D5 26.77 22.22 3D.19 51.54
B.MFR 3.11 2.54 2.83 2.18 2.88 4.03
C. COMM/INST. 5.81 4.71 7.99 4.58 6.69 12.37
D. INDUSTRIAL 124.28 114.82 125.88 121.19 135.11 141,82 E.LANDSCAPEIRR 0.86 D.48 D.30 0.13 D.58 5.95
F.OTHER D.D3 D.00 O.DS 0.02 0.01 D,D5
202DTTL URBAN RET. (A lllRU F) 164.37 146.58 163.40 150.29 175.25 215.76 AGIRR

WHOLESALE

4. •••••-•- METERED •-- WATER ••• • •-•• DELIVERIES-UNITS ---•T-•n-- -•n•-OF -• DELIVERY ---••-••• MG ···- 2022 -- Dt.C2021 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY A. SFR 30.70 26,96 30.85 39.81 42.1D 55.53

8.MFR 3.55 3 .37 3.29 4.28 4.58 5.62
C. COMM/INST. 4.60 3.86 5.50 6.27 8.76 12.23
D. INDUSTRIAL 138.98 132.90 133.14 134.85 137.41 154.81 E. LANDSCAPE IRR 0,63 0.16 1.21 3.68 4.20 4.18
F.OTHER 1.18 0.01 D.18 0.21 0.08 0.03
2020TT\. URBAN RET. -!A lllRU Fl 179.14 167.26 174.16 189,07 197.13 232.40 AGIRR

WHOLESALE
2 3 4

JUN JUL

51.57 4.47

11.59 129.68

6.38 D,03
203.73

JUN JUL

58.90 6.35

12.01 155.73

6.25 D.02
239.24
--2020 CONSUMPTION
--2021 CONSUMPTION
..... 2022 CONSUMPTION
- 2023 CONSUMPTION
s 1 a g 10 u 12

AUG SEP OCT NOV

83.75 83.82 52.84 47.00

4.89 4.88 5.81 4.83

13.74 14.54 11.87 11.41
138.37 143.40 127.06 113.80

7.09 6,98 4.14 5.08

0.14 0.03 0.12 0.40
227.98 233.83 201.54 112.53 0.00

AUG SEP OCT NOV

61.98 67.12 53.33 45.07 34.89

6.06 6.84 4.87 4.88 3.80

12.36 15.47 12.29 10.76 8.37
114.94 143.49 118.D9 12D.17 135.78

7.30 6.18 5.02 4.24 2.10

0.00 0.01 D.02 D.13 D.12
202.14 239.10 193.83 185.25 115.06
DEC

0.00 DEC

30.29 3.11

5.81 124.28

0.86 0.03
164.37
2023 TTL
433.75
>472.43 38.88'

99.50 1,290.91

37.D9

0.84 1,900.TT
0 0
2022 TTL
546.82

57.04 113.69
1,605.57

45.36 D.83
2 ,3419.31
0 0
or

24.85%
>603.86
or

25.49%

Page 295 ends

4. METERED -- - -- WATER -- DELIVERIES-UNITS ---- -- - - , .. - OF - DELIVERY - MG ···- DEC2021 JAN FEB A. SFR 31.14 32.40
B.MFR 3.26 3.44
C COMM/INST 5.06 6.35
D INDUSTRIAL 145.44 15678
E. LANDSCAPE IRR 1.95 0.40
F. OTHER 002 001
2020TTL URBAN RET. (A THR\J Fl 186.86 199.37
AGIRR
w-lOLESALE

4. METERED WATER DELIVER ES-UNITS OF DELIVERY - - -- - --· - -- MG -·- OEC2019 JAN FEB A. SFR 2635 26.99
B. MFR 3.60 3.46
C. COMM/INST. 4.23 3.94
0 . INDUSTRIAL 133.15 153.20
E. l.ANDSCAPE IRR 1.73 0.33
F. OTHER 0.00 0.00
2020TTL URBAN RET. (A THRU Fl 169.05 187.91
AG IRR
w-lOLESAlE
4 METERED
- ---- --- WATER
- - .. -- - DEL ---IVER · - - --
ES-UNITS -· OF DELIVERY - - - -· - MG ....... DEC2018 JAN FEB A SFR 25 23 26.13
B MFR 3 21 3.28
C. COMMnNST. 386 3.53

0. INDUSTRIAL 112.06 123.90
E. l.ANDSCAPE IRR 084 0.20
F OTHER 0.12 0.01
2019TTL URBAN RET, CA THRU Fl 145.32 157.05
~,- , ,1 •

MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
27 28 32.32 51 85 5892 6979 69.00

3.03 3.07 5.03 5.66 6.98 7.01

4.40 5 63 758 9.50 10.42 10.87
15900 12890 137 06 134.37 146.1' 121 85

0.25 1,01 5.08 703 9 31 909

0.00 0.28 1.18 0 86 4.41 815
193.95 171.20 207.7S ?16.32 2-1: J~ 225.98
I
~ 20 ...... - MAR AAA MAY JUN JUL

29.69 3$.41 34.52 56 50 72.36 66.46

3.21 3.82 4.21 5.89 6.56 5.98
406 6.21 4.64 8.06 9.78 9 .41
130.45 155.01 159.71 142.18 16605 15595

0.89 3.43 1 S4 7.94 10.81 ' 7.81

0.03 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.02
168.33 203.95 204.75 220.60 265.56 245.60
2a.·e- v-1, 9
.,,

MAR APR MAY JUN JUL
2129 21 77 31 82 52.19 55.59 63.31
317 2 95 3 64 579 5.53 6.62

3.20 3.25 4.87 8.83 9.29 11 36
111.14 120.97 121 .44 119.19 145.26 120.16

0.22 023 2.53 975 1005 11.14
002 0.02 006 0 04 0 01 003
139.04 149.19 164.36 195.78 225.72 212.62
Residential Usage Average from 2019 to 2022
2532%

AUG SEP OCT
61 65 62.23 51 .87

6.64 6.13 5.17
11 10 11.91 10.01
124.43 126.61 130.34
6 31 6 01 413
7 31 394 1,64
217.44 216.83 203.n

AUG SEP OCT
7810 56.56 5073

7.09 5.26 5.01

12.12 8.89 8.26
201.98 138 23 149.56

10.57 7.13 4.97

0.13 0.18 0.19
309.98 216.26 218.72

AUG SEP OCT

70.79 62.18 51.44
709 6.79 5.71

11.94 10.98 9.67
130.43 114.44 131.37

13.00 9.46 8.38
002 002 0.00
233.26 203.87 206.57

NOV DEC

30.56 30.70

4.09 3.55

6.56 4.60
126.27 138.98

1.99 0.63
1,06 1.18
170.53 179.64

NOV DEC

41.17 31 .14

4.16 3.26

8.48 5.06
151.82 145.44

3.38 1.95

0.16 0.02
209.18 186.86

NOV DEC

41.64 26.35
5 21 360

7.50 423
128.43 133.15

4.71 1.73

0.00 0.00
187.4& 169.0S
2021 TTL
578.56.

60.41 • >638.97

98.92 1,630.69
51 26
30 00
2,449.63
0 0
2020 TTl
or

28.08%
57963.
>637.51 57.88

88.92 1,849.57

60.85 0.85
2,637.70
0 0
2019 TTL
0(

24.17%
524.49 .
>583 87 59.38

88.63 1.499.88
71 .39
0 22
2,243.99
or

26.02%

Page 296 ends

j '
APPENDIX3
2022 Population Estimate

Page 297 ends

QuickFacts
California; Livingston city, California
Qu1ckFu:ts pmY1de1 statis11cs for aU states Md ro1,;11bes. and for cities and to\M'ls \Vlth a popul.tum •I 5,000 or""'" Population a
Popololl•n
tltimo~o, Jwl1 I, 1022, (VI011l
Populailon estimates base, Apnl 1, 2020~ (V2O22)
l'q,ulation, ~•cent change• April I. zn20 (e,timates b.,.) IO ldy I, 2021. (V2022l Populatiori, Cen!'ius, April l , 2020
Population, c .,.,us, Apnl l, 2010
C'tfjJ..-Jt.
41 l9,0l9,J41
41 )9.SJB.245
41-1)%
l9,5JK.22l
)7.25).916
t.ivinpton city,
Caliromia
4114,760
4114.177
4141%

14.172
ll.051

Page 298 ends

Date: 1 1/2112024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
To:

From:

Re:

Christopher Lopez. Interim City Manager
Anthony Chavarria, Public Works Director Updated Water System Capacity Assessment A Technical Memorandum was prepared by Gouveia Engineering on November 17, 2023. The Technical Memorandum provided an assessment of the capacity of the City of Livingston's municipal water supply.

The Technical Memorandum provides an analysis of the City's water supply subject to the City's maximum day demand (MOD) and peak hour demand (PHO) under current and future supply conditions.

Firm Capacity
For planning purposes, firm source capacity is equal to total capacity, minus the capacity of the largest well. The City's firm source capacity is 7,200-gpm (9,200-gpm -2,000-gpm). The City's firm capacity is available to meet MOD. The City's firm capacity to meet PHO is

9.200-gpm (7,200-gpm + 2,000-gpm).

The November 2023 assessment revealed that the City's spare water capacity is O (-22) gpm.

Firm source capacity (production) 7,200-gpm - (consumption) 7,222-gpm = spare capacity -22 gpm.

Water Demand
The city uses eight active wells and the booster pump station at the storage tank to meet the system MOD and PHO. According to §64554(b) of the CWC, maximum daily demand (MOD) and peak hour demand (PHO) are calculated for highest water usage during the last ten years.

According to the chart below the highest water usage for the last 10 years was 7,222 gpm during 2014. The highest water usage for peak hour demand was 10,883 gpm.

Page 299 ends

Total l\la:dmum Daily ».maod
l\lax A1111ual Anrage Dailr .!\lax l\lonth l\IDD Peak Bour Year l\l011tb P.-odurttou Demand.ADD Demand. !\nm Demaad. (MG) (ad) (gal) Date (MG) (gpm) PBD(pm)
2022 June 2.049 5.613.686 212. 753.367 Sept. 7 7.93 5.507 8.160 2021 !\fay 2.175 5.957.836 257.227.667 Jan. 21 8.58 5.958 8.938 2020 July 2.779 7.615.057 289.093.016 July 16 9.30 6.458 9.687 2019 July 2.395 6.561.627 256.024.390 June 12 799 5.549 8.323 2018 July 2.124 6.093.102 267. I 80. 750 Alig. 1-1 9.45 6.563 9.844 2017 August 2,037 5.582.170 21 5,61 7.627 Sept. 1 H 3 5.160 7.740 2016 July 2 191 6.003.535 235 .. 689.000 Aug. 13 9 44 6,556 9 833 201 5 July 2.190 5.998.647 235.036.000 Aug 8 9.60 6.667 10.000 2014 August 2.386 6.537.3 78 254.049 000 Aug. 22 10 40 7.222 10,833 2013 August 2.481 6,796.9 32 255.253.000 June 13 10.16 7.056 10.583 Field Analysis Report
On April 30 of 2024 Public Works provided a field analysis report of the water system and provided the Engineering department with well production data. The November 2023 Report used the guidelines set by the CWC and the Firm Capacity was calculated using the well design production on record with the State. The equipment does wear over time and well production will decrease as the equipment such as the pump bowls wear out.

The field analysis report revealed that the City's spare water capacity is O (-572) gpm.

Firm source capacity (production) 6,650-gpm - (consumption) 7,222-gpm = available capacity -572 gpm.

Well Efficiency Testing
The City contracted with Power Hydrodynamics Inc. to perform Well efficiency testing on all City owned Wells. The wells were tested at their current set max output to calculate the maximum production in gpm.

The Well efficiency testing revealed that the City's available water capacity is O (-1,230) gpm.

September 2024 firm source capacity (production) 5,992-gpm - (consumption) 7,222-gpm = available capacity -1,230 gpm. Conclusion
All three reports from November 2023 to September 2024 show that there is O spare water capacity available. The November 2023 theoretical available water capacity depicts a -22-gpm finding while compared to the most recent field assessment that shows that there is a -1,230-gpm available water capacity.

While the well efficiency testing did recommend avenues for improving production, the additional improvements would not increase the spare water capacity above O gpm.

The new Well 8A that is anticipated to be completed next year would just nominally improve production.

Anthony Chavarria,
Director of Public Works

Page 300 ends

Inc.

Report ID: PT-28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 8
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28905
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 68% • Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 602.7
Estimated Total kWh 43,501
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $6.53
Cost Per Acre Ft. $90.4
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 72.18
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 46.6%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $6,525.18

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
413.2
29,827
$0.15 $16.2
$61.98

72.18 1,000.00
68%
$4,474.08

SAVINGS
189.40 13,674
$28.42
$2,051.10
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 301 ends

Report ID: PT-28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 8 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 300929 Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A Serial#: S067492919-0009R0002 Livingston. CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 124.50 ft Run Number: 1 of 3 Discharge Pressure: 65.00 PSI Measured Flow: 392 gpm
Discharge Level: 150.15 ft Customer Flow: 400 gpm
Total Lift: 274.65 ft Flow Velocity: 0.92 ft/sec
Water Source: Well Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 1.73
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 0.87 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 58.31 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 44% Brake Horsepower: 55.4 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 602.67 Kilowatt Input to Motor. 43.5 kW Costto Pump an Acre Foot:$90.4 Energy Cost: $6.53/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 46.63%
Nameplate RPM: 1785 rpm Water Horsepower: 27 .19 hp
VFD: 51 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown max not describe the eume's normal eertormance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Vibration Analxsis was eerformed on this eume.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered waler level based on 5 minutes recove!1, well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller !}'.ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered lo be very low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 302 ends

Report ID: PT ·28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANAL YSlS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 8
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28905
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 543.1
Estimated Total kWh 69,402
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $10.41
Cost Per Acre Ft. $81.47
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 127.79
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 57.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $10,410.29

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
461.2
58,934
$0.15 $16.2
$69.18
127.79
1,000.00
68%
$8,840.05

SAVINGS

81.90 10,468
$12.29
$1,570.23
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 303 ends

Report ID; PT-28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 8 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.

Meter#: 300929 Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A 1416 C Street Serial#: S067492919--0009R0002 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 133.50 ft Run Number. 2 of 3 Discharge Pressure: 74.90 PSI Measured Flow: 694 gpm
Discharge Level: 173.02 ft Customer Flow: 700 gpm
Total Lift: 306.52 ft Flow Velocity: 1.63 ft/sec
Water Source: Well Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 3.07
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.55 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 93.03 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 71 % Brake Horsepower: 88.38 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 543.1 Kilowatt Input to Motor. 69.4 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$81.47 Energy Cost: $10.41/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 57.74% Nameplate RPM: 1785 rpm Water Horsepower. 53. 72 hp
VFD: 55hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma:t: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recover:t:, well could still be recoverin9.

This eume had a eroeeller !:t:ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc:t: of this elant is considered to be low assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 304 ends

Report ID: PT-28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 8
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28905
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
Tuesday, Sep 24, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 507.6
Estimated Total kWh 92,903
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $13.94
Cost Per Acre Ft. $76.14
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 183.03
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 66.3%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $13,935.38

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
495.2
90,630
$0.15 $16.2
$74.28
183.03
1,000.00
68%
$13,594.57

SAVINGS

12.40 2,272
$1.86
$340.82
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 305 ends

Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28905
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 8 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416CStreet Meter#: 300929 Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A Serial#:S067492919-0009R0002 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 142.00 ft Run Number: 3 of 3 Discharge Pressure: 81.00 PSI Measured Flow: 994 gpm
Discharge Level: 187 .11 ft Customer Flow: 1000 gpm
Total Lift: 329.11 ft Flow Velocity: 2.34 ft/sec
Water Source: Well Acre Feet per 24 Hr:4.4
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 2.21 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 124.53 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 95% Brake Horsepower: 118.3 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 507.59 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 92.9 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $76.14 Energy Cost: $13.94/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 66.34% Nameplate RPM: 1785 rpm Water Horsepower: 82.61 hp
VFD: 60hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma;t: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Well was runnina at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller ~ee flow meter.

Based on information obtained at the lime the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc;t: of this eiant is considered to be good assuming this run reeresents elanl's normal oeerating condition.

Page 306 ends

Inc.

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 8

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 300929
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water l evel
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet
Pumping Water Level, Feet
Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load% Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28905
PT-28905
Utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0.15
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
MeterkH: 1.20
Meter Const: 40
Motor Serial: S067492919-0009R0002
Amps: 142.00
NameplateRPM: 1785
Horsepower: 125.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 13.17
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3

65.00 74.90 81.00
0 0 0

0.00 0.00 0.00
0 0 0
150.15 173.02 187.11
124.50 133.50 142.00
274.65 306.519 329.11
392.00 694.00 994.00
400.00 700.00 1000.00

1.73 3.07 4.4

43.5 69.4 92.9

58.31 93.03 124.53

44.3 70.7 94.6
1517 1645 1785

51.00 55.30 60.00
602.67 543.1 507.59

46.6 57.7 66.3

6.53 10.41 13.94

27.19 53.72 82.61

0.92 1.63 2.34

Page 307 ends

(@N ~~rvices, Inc.

Vibration Analysis
Customer Name: City of Livingston
Location: Well8
Date: 9/17/2024
Highest
Run Number PSI GPM RPM Hertz VFD Vibration level
1 63.3 1009 1780 60 Yes -
Notes:

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
OK
Passed
Horizontal "' inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/srms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Location
Motor Top Vertical

Page 308 ends

Inc.
---
Overall Vibration Report
Date/ Time: Sep 18, 2024 11:13:24 AM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.1397 ips
00000

0.0185 ips
00000

0.0323 ,ps

0.0000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 8V.b . . . . 1 ration units in:1ps

0.0320 ips
00000

0.0520 ips
Jl,I( /I{,

0.0402 ips

0.0000

Page 1 ends
Page 309 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H1

0.0378 ips

I I I I
t _, 1
O Marker
L I Auto 'I lrouch 11 RMS I
CH1: 0.0286 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
00 I 11~
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0323
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 310 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2

0.Z440 ips
u '
0 Marker
L §j I Auto 'I lrouch 11 RMS I
CH1: 0.1845 tps
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
00 0
ANSI HI 9.6 4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.1397
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 311 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V1

0. 577 ips
0 Marker
§j I Auto •t lr ouch 11 RMS I
CH1: 0.0438 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
00 0
ANSI HI 9.6 4
Vibrat,on Allowable
Value

0.0402
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 312 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2
O.PB13 ips
J UJ. i. . - • t . - I
O Marker
L I Auto 'I !Touch 11 RMS I
-
CH1: 0.0616 ips
1775 CPM
.

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0520
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 313 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1
o. 168 ips
0 Marker
j Auto
'I lrouch 11 RMS I
CHl: 0.0129 ips
1775CPM

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 96.4
Vibraho" Allowab e
Value
0 .0185
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 314 ends

Point A2
o. 244 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1: 0.0185 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9,6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
0 ,!4/1

0.0320
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 315 ends

Inc.
-- Report ID: PT-28906
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant. e I 9
PUMP TEST REFERENCE N MBER: PT-28906
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 17 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 584.8
Estimated Total kWh 108,643
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $16.3
Cost Per Acre Ft. $87.71
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 185.79 Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 61.6%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $16,296.45

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
522.3
97,032
$0.15
$19.44 $78.34
185.79
1,000.00
69%
$14,554.81

SAVINGS

62.50 11,611
$9.37
$1,741.64
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 316 ends

Inc.
-- Report ID: PT-28906
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston -Well 9 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 17 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318488 Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A Serial#: R037405531-0004R0006 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 115.00 ft Run Number: 1 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 206.00 ft Measured Flow: 1009 gpm Drawdown: 91 ft Customer Flow: 1000 gpm
Yield: 11.09 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 2.36 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 63.30 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr:4.46
Discharge Level: 146.22 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS):2.25 ft Total Lift: 352.22 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 145.63 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 92% Brake Horsepower: 138.35 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:584.76 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 108.64 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$87.71 Energy Cost: $16.3fllr Overall Plant Efficiency: 61.63% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower: 89. 75 hp
VFD: 60hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown mal not describe the eume's normal eertormance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Vibration Anallsis was eerformed on this eume.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!l'., well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller !)'.ee flow meter.

Based on information obtained at the time the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficien~ of this elant is considered to be fair assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 317 ends

Inc.

Report ID: PT-28906
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY IN FORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 9
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28906
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 17 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 722.7
Estimated Total kWh 78,912
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $11.84
Cost Per Acre Ft. $108.4
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 109.19
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 43.4%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $11,836.83

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
454.2
49,597
$0.15
$19.44 $68.13
109.19
1,000.00
69%
$7,439.49

SAVINGS
268.50 29,316
$40.27
$4,397.33
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions. please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 318 ends

Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28906
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 9 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 17 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer lnfonnation Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318488 Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A Serial#: R037405531-0004R0006 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 115.00 ft Run Number: 2 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 167.50 ft Measured Flow: 593 gpm Drawdown: 52.5 ft Customer Flow: 600 gpm
Yield: 11.3 gpmlft Flow Velocity: 1.39 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 60.10 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 2.62 Discharge Level: 138.83 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.32 ft Total Lift: 306.33 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 105. 78 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 67% Brake Horsepower: 100.49 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 722.7 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 78.91 kW Costto Pump an Acre Foot:$108.4 Energy Cost: $11.84/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 43.37% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower: 45.87 hp
VFD: 50 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma:i: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Well was runninl:j at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recoverin9.

This eume had a eroeeller !:£ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 319 ends

Report ID: PT-28906
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal .powerhydrodynamics .com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 9
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28906
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 17 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69% • Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 643.6
Estimated Total kWh 97,763
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $14.66
Cost Per Acre Ft. $96.53
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 151.91
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 52.2%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $14,664.41

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
487.2
74,017
$0.15
$19.44
$73.09
151.91
1,000.00
69%
$11,102.56

SAVINGS
156.30
23,746
$23.45
$3,561.84
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 320 ends

6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
Report ID: PT-28906 cal .powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 9 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 17 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information
City of Livingston
Power Company Data Equipment Data
Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Contact: Jesus Chavez Cell: 209-720-8793
MID
Meter#: 318488
Rate Schedule: MID
Average Cost: $0.15
Hydraulic Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 115.00 ft
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 187.00 ft
Drawdown: 72 ft
Yield: 11.46 gpm/ft
Discharge Pressure: 61.30 PSI
Discharge Level: 141.6 ft
Total Lift: 328.6 ft
Water Source: Well
Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A
Senal#:R037405531-0004R0006
Pump Make: Floway Pump Type: Turbine Dnve Type: Electric Motor Geamead Make:

Flow Data
Run Number: 3 of 3
Measured Flow: 825 gpm
Customer Flow: 800 gpm
Flow Velocity: 1.93 ft/sec
Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 3.65
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.84 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 131.05 hp
Brake Horsepower: 124.49 hp
Kilowatt Input to Motor: 97. 76 kW
Energy Cost: $14.66/hr
Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm
VFD: 55hz
Remarks
Percent of Rated Motor Load: 83%
Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 643.56
Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $96.53
Overall Plant Efficiency: 52.24%
Water Horsepower: 68.46 hp
Run Hours: 1000
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your pump, the results shown may not describe the pump's normal performance.

This pump has an adequate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recovery, well could still be recovering.

This pump had a propeller type flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 321 ends

Inc.

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 9

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 318488
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level. Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load% Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28906
PT-28906
·utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0.15
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 17 2024
MeterkH: 1.20
Meter Const: 40
Motor Serial: R037405531-0004R0006
Amps: 164.00
NameplateRPM: 1780
Horsepower: 150.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 13.20
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1 Test2 Test 3

63.30 60.10 61.30
115 115 115
115.00 115.00 115.00
91 52,5 72
146.22 138,83 141.6
206.00 167.50 187.00
352.223 306.331 328.603
1009.00 593.00 825.00
1000.00 600.00 800.00

11.09 11.3 11.46

4.46 2.62 3.65
108.64 78.91 97.76 145.63 105.78 131.05

92.2 67 83

60.00 50.00 55.00
584.76 722.7 643.56

61.6 43.4 52.2

16.3 11.84 14.66

89.75 45.87 68.46

2.36 1.39 1.93

Page 322 ends

(8W::,rvices, Inc.

Customer Name:

Location:

Date:

Run Number
1 Notes:

City of Livingston
We119
9/17/2024
PSI

63.3 GPM RPM
1009 1780
Vibration Analysis
Hertz
60 VFD
Yes
Highest
Vibration level

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
OK
Passed
stage or the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
Imbalance
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Location
Motor Top Horizontal

Page 323 ends

Inc.
---
Overall Vibration Report
Date/ Time: Sep 17, 2024 12:26:43 PM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.0443 ips
00000

0.0198 ips
00000

0.0240 ips
00000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 9V.b t' ·t . . 1. ra 10n uni s m:1ps

0.0140 ips
00000

0.0276 ips
00000

0.0290 ips
00000

Page 1 ends
Page 324 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H1

0.0084 ips
o Marker LJ FFT j I Auto I Ir ouch 11 RMs11
CH1: 0.0250 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowab e
Value
0 '147

0.0240
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 325 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2

0.0344 ips
0 Marker
L I Aut~ J lrouch l I RMs1J
CH1: 0,0456 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
0~0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.:/tl/

0.0443
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 326 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V1
r

0.0069 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I Ir ouch 11 RMs' I
CH1: 0.0258 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM I
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.'.,',17

0.0290
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 327 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2

0.0134 ips
0 Marker
L [§j I Auto I lrouch 1 1 RMs•}
CH1: 0.0276 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.:l47

0.0276
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 328 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1

0.0076 ips
0 Marker
I Auto I !Touch 11 RMs
1 1
CH1: 0.0198 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
0~ 0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
0147
0 .0198
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 329 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A2

0.0050 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I Ir ouch 11 RMs' I
CH1: 0.0140 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0140
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 330 ends

Report ID: PT-28907
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal .powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 100.00 Plant: ell 11
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28907
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 17 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 67%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 574.3
Estimated Total kWh 51,601
Average Cost per kWh $0.15 Average Cost per hour $7.74
Cost Per Acre Ft. $86.14
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 89.86 Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 30.4%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $7,740.21

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
260.4
23,395
$0.15
$12.96 $39.05

89.86 1,000.00
67%
$3,509.27

SAVINGS
313.90
28,206
..
$47.09
$4,230.95
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 331 ends

Report ID: PT-28907
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 11 - Run 1
latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 17 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 100.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 1010260626 Volts/Amps: 460V/114.00A Serial #: S047481880-0006R0001 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 55.00 ft Run Number: 1 of 1
Discharge Pressure: 50.00 PSI Measured Flow: 488 gpm
Discharge Level: 115.5 ft Customer Flow: 480 gpm
Total Lift: 170.5 ft Flow Velocity: 1.22 ft/sec
Water Source: Well Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 2.16
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.09 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor:69.17 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 66% Brake Horsepower: 65.71 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:574.26 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 51.6 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $86.14 Energy Cost: $7.74/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 30.38%
Nameplate RPM: 1785 rpm Water Horsepower: 21.01 hp
VFD: 59hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown max not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Vibration Anal:tsis was eerformed on this eume.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!X, well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller !:£ea flow meter.

Based on information obtained at the time the test was performed. this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very tow assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 332 ends

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 11

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 1010260626
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results
Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level, Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load%
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28907
PT-28907
Utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0.15
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynarnics.com
Test Date: Sep 17 2024
MeterkH: 1.80
Meter Const: 40
Motor Serial: S047481880-0006R0001
Amps: 114.00
NameplateRPM: 1785
Horsepower: 100.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 12.80
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1

50.00 0

0.00 0
115.5

55.00 170.5
488.00 480.00

2.16 51.6

69.17 65.7

59.40 574.26

30.4 7.74

21.01 1.22

Page 333 ends

(@A~rvices, Inc. Vibration Analysis
Customer Name: City of Livingston
Location:

Date:

Well 11
9/17/2024
Highest
Run Number PSI GPM RPM Hertz VFD Vibration level
1 50 488 1785 59.4 Yes -
Notes:

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
OK
Passed
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Location
Motor Top Vertical

Page 334 ends

Inc .
........ ____ ___
Overall Vibration Report
Date I Time: Sep 17, 2024 14:06:42 PM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.0422 ips
00000

0.0163 ips
00000

0.0157 ips
00000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 11 .b . . . . V1 . ration units 1n:Ips

0.0325 ips
00000

0.0323 ips

0.0000

0.0390 ips

0.0000

Page 1 ends
Page 335 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H1

0.0130 ips
0 Marker
L §j I Auto I !Touch 11 RMs' I
CH1: 0.0157 ips RMS
60,0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibtatioo Allowable
Value

0.0157
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 336 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2

0.0634 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I lrouch 11 RMsj
Ct-11: 0.0428 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
liJ0 0
ANSI HI 964
Vibratiol'l Allowable
Value

0.:l•l 7
0,0422
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 337 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V1

0.0298 ips
0 Marker
I Auto I !Touch 11 RMs11
CH1: 0.0390 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI Ht 9,64
Vibration Al!Ow~ le
Value
lLbl/

0.0390
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 338 ends

Point V2

0.0447 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CHl: 0.0318 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6 4
Vibration Allowable
Value
O.:Ml

0.0323
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 339 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1

0.0134 ips
0 Merker
L ] Auto I !Touch 11 RMs11
CH1: 0.0161 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0163
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 340 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A2

0.0130 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I lrouch 11 RMs' I
CH1: 0.0325 ips RMS
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0325
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 341 ends

Inc.

Report ID: PT-28908
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal .powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: ell 12
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28908
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 464.9
Estimated Total kWh 102,203
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $15.33
Cost Per Acre Ft. $69.73
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 219.86
Run Hours · 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 67.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $15,330.42

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
463.1
101,809
$0.15 $16.2
$69.46
219.86
1,000.00
68%
$15,271.34

SAVINGS

1.80 394
..
$0.27
$59.09
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 342 ends

Inc.
-- Report ID: PT-28908
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal. powerhydrodyna mies.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 12 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer lnfom1ation Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: BMR
1416 C Street Meter#: 318793 Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A Serial #: 9006050 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez
Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine
Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 102.20 ft Run Number: 1 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 147.00ft Measured Flow: 1194 gpm Drawdown: 44.8 ft Customer Flow: 1200 gpm
Yield: 26.65 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 2.98 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 69.60 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 5.28 Discharge Level: 160.78 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 2.66 ft Total Lift: 307.78 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 137 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 104% Brake Horsepower: 130.15 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:464.86 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 102.2 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$69.73 Energy Cost: $15.33/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 67.74% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 92.8 hp
VFD: 60hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown mal not describe the eume•s normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Vibration Anal:t'.sis was eerformed on this eume.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!:l:'., well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller ~ee flow meter.

Based on information obtained at the time the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered lo be very good assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 343 ends

Report ID: PT-28908
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 12
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28908
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 542.6
Estimated Total kWh 90,212
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $13.53
Cost Per Acre Ft. $81.38
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 166.27
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 55.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $13,531.87

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
444.3
73,878
$0.15 $16.2
$66.65
166.27
1,000.00
68%
$11,081.67

SAVINGS

98.20 16,335
$14.74
$2,450.20
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 344 ends

Inc.

RepOl1 ID: PT-28908
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston • Well 12 • Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: BMR
1416 C Street Meter#: 318793 Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A Serial #: 9006050 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 102.20 ft Run Number: 2 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 138.00 ft Measured Flow: 903 gpm Drawdown: 35.8 ft Customer Flow: 900 gpm
Yield: 25.22 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 2.25 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 68.10 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 4
Discharge Level: 157.31 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS):2.01 ft Total Lift: 295.31 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 120.92 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 92% Brake Horsepower: 114.88 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 542.56 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 90.21 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $81.38 Energy Cost: $13.53/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 55.69% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower: 67.34 hp
VFD: 56hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma~ not describe the eume's normal eertorrnance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove~, well could still be recovering.

This eume had a eroeeller ~ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficien~ of this elant is considered to be low assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 345 ends

Report ID: PT-28908
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Wednesday, Sep 25, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 12
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28908
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 647.2
Estimated Total kWh 72,102
Average Cost per kWh $0.15 Average Cost per hour $10.82 Cost Per Acre Ft. $97.08
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 111.40
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 43.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $10,815.30

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
416.3
46,376
$0.15 $16.2
$62.44
111.40
1,000.00
68%
$6,956.39

SAVINGS
230.90
25,726
*
$34.64
$3,858.91
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 346 ends

6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
Report ID: PT-28908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 12 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information
City of Livingston
Power Company Data Equipment Data
Motor Make: BMR
Volts/Amps: 460V/142.00A
Serial #: 9006050 1416 C Street Livingston, CA 95334
Contact: Jesus Chavez
Cell: 209-720-8793
MID
Meter#: 318793 Rate Schedule: MID
Average Cost: $0.15
Hydraulic Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 102.20 ft
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 127.00 ft
Drawdown: 24.8 ft
Yield: 24.4 gprrv'ft
Discharge Pressure: 64.80 PSI
Discharge Level: 149.69 ft
Total Lift: 276.69 ft
Water Source: Well
Pump Make: Floway Pump Type: Turbine
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Geartiead Make:

Flow Data
Run Number: 3 of 3
Measured Flow: 605 gpm
Customer Flow: 600 gpm
Flow Velocity: 1.51 ft/sec
Acre Feet per 24 Hr:2.68
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS}: 1.35 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 96.65 hp
Brake Horsepower: 91.82 hp
Kilowatt Input to Motor: 72.1 kW
Energy Cost: $10.82/hr
Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm
VFD: 51 hz
Remarks
Percent of Rated Motor Load: 73%
Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:647.23
Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$97.08
Overall Plant Efficiency: 43.74%
Water Horsepower: 42.27 hp
Run Hours: 1000
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your pump, the results shown may not describe the pump's normal performance.

This pump has an adequate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recovery, well could still be recovering.

This pump had a propeller type flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 347 ends

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 12

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 318793
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: BMR
Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Waler Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown. Feel Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level, Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load%
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower. hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28908
PT•28908
Utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0 .15
Motor Serial: 9006050
Amps: 142.00
NameplateRPM: 1780
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1

69.60 102.2
102.20

44.8 160.78 147.00
307.776
1194.00 1200.00

26.65 5.28
102.2
137
104.1
1780

59.98 464.86

67.7 15.33

92.8 2.98
Test2

68.10 102.2
102.20

35.8 157.31 138.00
295.311
903.00 900.00

25.22 4

90.21 120.92

91.9 1649

55.60 542.56

55.7 13.53

67.34 2.25
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal. powerhydrodynamics. com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
Meter kH: 1.80
Meter Const: 40
Horsepower: 125.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 12.80
Test3

64.80 102.2
102.20

24.8 149.69 127.00
276.688
605.00 600.00

24.4 2.68

72.1 96.65

73.5 1513

51.00 647.23

43.7 10.82

42.27 1.51

Page 348 ends

(@41•:rvices, Inc.

Vibration Analysis
Customer Name: City of Livingston
Location:

Date:

Well 12
9/18/2024
Highest
Run Number PSI GPM RPM Hertz VFD Vibration level
1 69.6 1194 1780 59.98 Yes -
Notes:

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical= 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
OK
Passed
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Location
Motor Top Vertical

Page 349 ends

Inc .
....... _____ __
Overall Vibration Report
Date/ Time: Sep 18, 2024 11:59:42 AM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.0956 ips
00000

0.0196 ips
00000
0,0393 ips

0.0000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 12 .b t· ·t . . V1 ra 10n urn s m:1ps

0.0322 ips
00000

0.0643 ips
00000

0.0403 ips
J 00(0

Page 1 ends
Page 350 ends

Point H1
o.P622 ips
I
'- I~ I 1
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1: 0.0472 ips
1775CPM
• . .

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0393
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 351 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2
r
o., 501 ips
v... . t
0 Marker
CH1: 0.1136 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
L [§J I Auto 'I !Touch 11 RMS I 000 -0.0956
Vibration Spectrum/Time~Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 352 ends

Point V1

0.P649 ips
I
I 1 •. I •
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Cl-41: 0.04 93 ips
1775 CPM
_., I

60.0 kCPM
~ -0 0 1
ANSI HI 96.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0403
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 353 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2
o.~126 ips
,I I • .

O Marker
L I FFT 'I I Auto 'I Ir ouch 11 RMS I
-
CH1: 0.0852 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
00 0
ANSI HI 9.64
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0643
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 354 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1

0. 160lps
O Marker
L I Auto1I lrouch l I RMS I
CH1: 0.0121 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
U :/1111

0.0196
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 355 ends

Point A2
O. 191 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1: 0.0146 ips
1775 CPM

60.0 kCPM
0~0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibra1,on Allowable
Value

0.0322
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 356 ends

(@•~rvices, Inc.

Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal. powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant. ell 13
Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
PUMP TEST REFERENCE N BER: PT-28909
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 542.6
Estimated Total kWh 115,003
Average Cost per kWh $0.21
Average Cost per hour $24.45
Cost Per Acre Ft. $115.39
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 211.94
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 64.2%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $24,455.43

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
504.5
106,931
$0.21
$27.56
$107.29
211.94
1,000.00
69%
$22,738.98

SAVINGS

38.10 8,072
$8.10
$1,716.45
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 357 ends

Inc.
__.... Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston -Well 13 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston PG&E Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 1009502314 Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A Serial #: S067490122.()003R0002 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: A10 Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.21 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 108.00 ft Run Number. 1 of 3 Recovered Water Level (RWL): 121.00 ft Measured Flow: 1151 gpm Pumping Water Level (PWL): 185.50 ft Customer Flow: 1100 gpm Drawdown: 77.5 ft Flow Velocity: 2.87 ft/sec
Yield: 14.85 gpm/ft Acre Feet per 24 Hr. 5.09
Discharge Pressure: 67.00 PSI Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 2.56 ft Discharge Level: 154. 77 ft
Total Lift: 340.27 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 154.16 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 98% Brake Horsepower: 146.45 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 542.63 Kilowatt Input to Motor. 115 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$115.39 Energy Cost: $24.45/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 64.16% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 98.9 hp
VFD: 55 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma:r: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recovering.

Vibration Anal:t:sis was eerformed on this eume.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a eroeeller !}'.ee flow meter.

Based on information obtained at the time the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc:r: of this elant is considered to be good assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 358 ends

Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 13
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28909
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.
lt is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 74.5%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) wlll remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING IMPROVED

PLANT PLANT SAVINGS

EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 485.5 485.5
Estimated Total kWh 127,754 127,754
Average Cost per kWh $0.21 $0.21
Average Cost per hour $27.17 $27.56
Cost Per Acre Ft. $103.25 $103.25
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 263.13 263.13
Run Hours 1,000.00 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 74.5% 74.5%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $27,166.79 $27,166.79
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 359 ends

Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 13 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer lnfonnation Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston PG&E Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 1009502314 Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A Senal#:S067490122.0003R0002 LMngston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: A 10 Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.21 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 108.00 ft Run Number. 2 of 3 Recovered Water Level (RWL): 121.00 ft Measured Flow: 1429 gpm Pumping Water Level (PWL): 199.00 ft Customer Flow: 1400 gpm Drawdown: 91 ft Flow Velocity: 3.56 ft/sec
Yield: 15. 7 gpmfft Acre Feet per 24 Hr. 6.32
Discharge Pressure: 67.00 PSI Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 3.18 ft Discharge Level: 154.77 ft
Total Lift: 353. 77 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 171.25 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 108% Brake Horsepower: 162.68 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 485.52 Kilowatt Input to Motor.127.75 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $103.25 Energy Cost: $27 .17 /hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 7 4.55% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 127.66 hp
VFD: 60hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma~ not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recovering.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a eroeeller !}'.ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWL
Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very good assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 360 ends

Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 13
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28909
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 541.9
Estimated Total kWh 66,352
Average Cost per kWh $0.21
Average Cost per hour $14.11
Cost Per Acre Ft. $115.23
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 122.45
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 58.5%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $14,109.72

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
459.8
56,297
$0.21
$27.56 $97.77
122.45
1,000.00
69%
$11,971.55

SAVINGS

82.10 10,055
$17.46
$2,138.16
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 361 ends

Report ID: PT-28909
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 13 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston PG&E Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 1009502314 Volts/Amps: 460V/164.00A Serial #: S067490122.(l()()3R0002 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: A10 Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.21 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 108.00 ft Run Number: 3 of 3 Recovered Water Level (RWL): 121.00 ft Measured Flow: 665 gpm Pumping Water Level (PWL): 165.00 ft Customer Flow: 650 gpm Drawdown: 57 ft Flow Velocity: 1.66 ft/sec
Yield: 11. 67 gpm/ft Acre Feet per 24 Hr.2.94
Discharge Pressure: 62.80 PSI Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.48 ft Discharge Level: 145.07 ft
Total Lift: 310.07 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 88.94 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 56% Brake Horsepower: 84.49 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 541.87 Kilowatt Input to Motor.66.35 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $115.23 Energy Cost: $14.11/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 58.54% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 52.07 hp
VFD: 47 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma:z:: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an ade9uale lest section.

Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!J'., well could still be recovering.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a eroeeller !:z::ee flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc:z:: of this elant is considered to be fair assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 362 ends

d•••dervices, Inc.
-
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 13

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 1009502314
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts:460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level, Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load%
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28909
PT-28909
Utility: PG&E
Rate Sched: A 10
Avg Cost kWh: $0.21
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
Meter kH: 1.80
Meter Const:

Motor Serial: S067490122-0003R0002
Amps: 164.00
NameplateRPM: 1780
Horsepower: 150.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 12.80
Pump Type: Turbine
Test1 Test 2 Test 3

67.00 67.00 62.80
108 108 108
121.00 121.00 121.00

77.5 91 57
154.77 154.77 145.07 185.50 199.00 165.00
340.27 353.77 310.068
1151.00 1429.00 665.00 1100.00 1400.00 650.00

14.85 15.7 11.67

5.09 6.32 2.94
115 127.75 66.35
154.16 171.25 88.94

97.6 108.5 56.3
1632 1780 1379

55.00 59.90 46.50
542.63 485.52 541.87

64.2 74.5 58.5

24.45 27.17 14.11

98.9 127.66 52.07

2.87 3.56 1.66

Page 363 ends

(@8~rvices, Inc.

Customer Name:

Location:

Date:

Run Number
Notes:

City of Livingston
Well 13
9/18/2024
PSI
67 GPM RPM
1151 1632
Vibration Analysis
Hertz
55 VFD
Yes
Highest
Vibration level

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
OK
Passed
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Location
Motor Bottom Axial

Page 364 ends

Inc.

Overall Vibration Report
Date I Time:Sep 18, 2024 14:03:50 PM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.1108 ips
00000

0.1120 ips
00000

0.0849 ips
00000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 13 .b . . . . V1 ration units m:1ps

0.0639 ips
00000

0.0602 ips
00000

0.0573 ips
0 OOC•:•

Page 1 ends
Page 365 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H1

0.0263 ips
O Marker
L I Auto J lrouch 11 RMs1)
CH1: 0.0849 ips R ...

ANSI HI 9 .6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
0 l 4 7

0.0849
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 366 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2

0.1310 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I !Touch 11 RMs11
CH1: 0.1108 ips RMS
I

60.0 kCPM
0 0 0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowab e
Value

0.1108
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 367 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V1

0.0252 ips
O Marker
I. ~FT~I I Auto I l~~uch I J Fi~~•1
CH1! 0.0582 Ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
LAJ 0 11
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibratio" Allowable
Value

0.0573
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 368 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2

0.0760 ips
0 Marker
] Auto I !Touch 11 RMs
1 l
CH1: 0.0587 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
0 ~ 0
ANSI HI 96.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0602
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 369 ends

Point A1

0.0172 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1; 0.1120 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
~00
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
01117

0.1120
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 370 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A2

0.0095 ips
0 Marker
L I Auto I jrouch 1 1 RMs1 l
CH1 : 0.0635 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI HI 9 .64
Vibrauor> Altowable
Value
0 .!47
0 .0639
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 371 ends

Report ID: PT-28912
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plantf Well 14
PUMP TEST REFERENCE r-.toMBER: PT-28912
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 464.9
Estimated Total kWh 42,801
Average Cost per kWh $0.21
Average Cost per hour $9.1
Cost Per Acre Ft. $98.86
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 92.07
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 63.8%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $9,101.67

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
435.9
40,130
$0.21
$25.08 $92.69

92.07 1,000.00
68%
$8,533.57

SAVINGS

29.00 2,672
$6.17
$568.10
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 372 ends

Inc.
-- Report ID: PT-28912
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston -Well 14 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston PG&E Motor Make: SME
1416 C Street Meter#: 1008819091 Volts/Amps: 460V/172.00A Serial #: 2303DP7149 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: A10 Pump Make: No Name Plate Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.21 Pump Type: Submersible Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 115.00 ft Run Number: 1 of 2 Recovered Water Level (RWL): 116.00 ft Measured Flow: 500 gpm Pumping Water Level (PWL): 128.00 ft Customer Flow: 510 gpm Drawdown: 13 ft Flow Velocity: 1. 76 ft/sec
Yield: 38.46 gpm/ft Acre Feet per 24 Hr:2.21
Discharge Pressure: 70.00 PSI Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.11 ft Discharge Level: 161.7ft
Total Lift: 289.7 ft
Wat.er Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 57 .37 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 40% Brake Horsepower: 49.91 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:464.89 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 42.8 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $98.86 Energy Cost: $9.1/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 63. 76%
Nameplate RPM: 1735 rpm Water Horsepower. 36.58 hp
VFD: 48 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma:z: not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Recovered waler level based on 5 minutes recove!)'., well could still be recovering.

Vibration Anal:z:sis was eerformed on this eume.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a eroeeller ~ee flow meter.

Based on information obtained al the time the lest was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc:z:: of this elant is considered to be good assuming this run reeresents eiant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 373 ends

Report ID: PT-28912
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto. CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY IN FORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 125.00 Plant: Well 14
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28912
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 68%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 529.2
Estimated Total kWh 99,203
Average Cost per kWh $0.21
Average Cost per hour $21 .09
Cost Per Acre Ft. $112.54
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 187.45
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 58.3%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $21,095.46

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
453.5
85,001
$0.21
$25.08 $96.43
187.45
1,000.00
68%
$18,075.43

SAVINGS

75.80 14,202
$16.11
$3,020.03
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 374 ends

Report ID: PT-28912
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 14 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 125.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston PG&E Motor Make: SME
1416 C Street Meter#: 1008819091 Volts/Amps: 460V/172.00A Serial #: 2303DP7149 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: A10 Pump Make: No Name Plate Contact; Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.21 Pump Type: Submersible Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 115.00 ft Run Number: 2 of 2 Recovered Water Level (RWL): 116.00 ft Measured Flow: 1018 gpm Pumping Water Level (PWL): 142.00 ft Customer Flow: 1000 gpm Drawdown: 27 ft Flow Velocity: 3.58 ff/sec
Yield: 37.7 gpm/ft Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 4.5
Discharge Pressure: 69.00 PSI Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS):2.27 ft Discharge Level: 159.39 ft
Total Lift: 301.39 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 132.98 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 93% Brake Horsepower: 115.69 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 529.23 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 99.2 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $112.54 Energy Cost: $21.09/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 58.27% Nameplate RPM: 1735 rpm Water Horsepower: 77.48 hp
VFD: 60hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown mal not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recovering.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a magnetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiencl of this elant is considered to be fair assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 375 ends

Inc.

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 14
Report ID: PT-28912
HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS PT-28912
Tester: Bill Power Utility: PG&E
Meter#: 1008819091 Rate Sched: A 10
Annual Run Hrs: 1000 Avg Cost kWh: $0.21
Motor Make: SME Motor Serial: 2303DP7149
Volts: 460 Amps: 172.00
Gearhead Make: NameplateRPM: 1735
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
Meter kH: 1.80
Meter Const: 40
Horsepower: 125.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 10. 78
Pump Make: No Name Plate Pump Type: Submersible
Water Source: Well
Results Test1 Test2
Discharge Pressure, PSI 70.00 69.00
Standing Water Level, Feet 115 115
Recovered Water Level 116.00 116.00 Drawdown, Feet 13 27 Discharge Head, Feet 161.7 159.39 Pumping Water Level, Feet 128.00 142.00
Total Measured Head, Feet 289.7 301.39
Measured GPM 500.00 1018.00
Customer Meter, GPM 510.00 1000.00
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown 38.46 37,7
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours 2.21 4.5
kW Input to Motor 42.8 99.2
HP Input to Motor 57.37 132.98
Motor Load% 39.9 92.6
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz: 47.96 59.90
kWh per Acre Foot 464.89 529.23
Overall Plant Efficiency (%) 63.8 58.3
Energy Cost per Hour 9.1 21.09
Water Horsepower, hp 36.58 77.48
Flow Velocity, ft/sec 1.76 3.58

Page 376 ends

Report ID: PT-28910
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: ell 16
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28910
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 602.3
Estimated Total kWh 88,502
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $13.28
Cost Per Acre Ft. $90.35
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 146.94
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 58.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $13,275.37

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
512.7
75,329
$0.15
$20.07
$76.9
146.94
1,000.00
69%
$11,299.33

SAVINGS

89.70 13,174
$13.45
$1,976.03
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at {209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures
(@►".:.rvices, Inc.

Report ID: PT-28910
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynam1cs.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston� Well 16 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318833
Volts/Amps: 460V/171.00A
Serial#: K0582001260-005R-05 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez
Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine
Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 108.00 ft Run Number. 1 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 142.00 ft Measured Flow: 798 gpm Drawdown: 34 ft Customer Flow: 840 gpm
Yield: 23.47 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 0 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 88.20 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 3.53 Discharge Level: 203. 7 4 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.78 ft Total Lift: 345.74 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 118.63 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 73% Brake Horsepower: 109.14 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 602.31 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 88.5 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $90.35 Energy Cost: $13.28/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 58.73% Nameplate RPM: 1775 rpm Water Horsepower: 69.67 hp
VFD: 54 hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma)'._ not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an ade9uate test section.

Vibration Anal)'._sis was eerformed on this eume.

Well was runnin9 at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!}'., well could still be recoverin9.

Based on informatlon obtained at the time the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

This eume had a ma9netic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc)'._ of this elant is considered to be fair assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Page 377 ends

-

Page 378 ends

(@-~rvices, Inc.

Report ID: PT-28910
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal. powerhydrodynamics. com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 16
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28910
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

II is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 546.3
Estimated Total kWh 85,302
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $12.8
Cost Per Acre Ft. $81.95
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 156.14
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 59.5%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $12,795.35

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
470.8
73,506
$0.15
$20.07 $70.61
156.14
1,000.00
69%
$11,025.83

SAVINGS

75.60 11,797
$11.33
$1,769.52
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 379 ends

d••ii•oervices, Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28910
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 16 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318833 Volts/Amps: 460Vl171.00A Serial#: K058200126Q.005R-05 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Floway Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 108.00 ft Run Number. 2 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 144.00 ft Measured Flow: 848 gpm Drawdown: 36 ft Customer Flow: 871 gpm
Yield: 23.56 gpmlft Flow Velocity: 0 ftlsec
Discharge Pressure: 75. 10 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 3.75 Discharge Level: 173.48 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.89 ft Total Lift: 317.48 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor.114.34 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 70% Brake Horsepower. 105.2 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot 546.3 Kilowatt Input to Motor. 85.3 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$81.95 Energy Cost: $12.8/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 59.46%
Nameplate RPM: 1775 rpm Water Horsepower. 67.99 hp
VFD: 52hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma;t not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recove!J'., well could still be recoverin9.

This eume had a magnetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc;r: of this elant is considered to be low assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeeraling condition.

Page 380 ends

Inc.
-- Report ID: PT-28910
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 150.00 Plant: Well 16
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28910
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements wlll be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 560.7
Estimated Total kWh 41,401
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $6.21
Cost Per Acre Ft. $84.11
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 73.84
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 45.2%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $6,210.17

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
367.6
27,144
$0.15
$20.07 $55.14

73.84 1,000.00
69%
$4,071.61

SAVINGS
193.10 14,257
$28.96
$2,138.56
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 381 ends

6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
Report ID: PT-28910 cal .powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston -Well 16 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 150.00 Customer lnfom1ation
City of Livingston
Power Company Data Equipment Data
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts/Amps: 460V/171.00A
Serial #: K058200126().005R.05
Pump Make: Floway
1416 C Street
MID
Meter#: 318833
Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID
Average Cost: $0.15 Contact: Jesus Chavez
Cell: 209-720-8793
Hydraulic Data
Recovered Water Level (RWL): 108.00 ft
Pumping Water Level (PWL): 128.50 ft
Drawdown: 20.5 ft
Yield: 19.56 gpm/ft
Discharge Pressure: 51. 70 PSI
Discharge Level: 119.43 ft
Total Lift: 247.93 ft
Water Source: Well
Pump Type: Turbine
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Gearhead Make:

Flow Data
Run Number. 3 of 3
Measured Flow: 401 gpm
Customer Flow: 439 gpm
Flow Velocity: 0 ft/sec
Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 1. 77
Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 0.89 ft
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 55.5 hp
Brake Horsepower: 51.06 hp
Kilowatt Input to Motor. 41.4 kW
Energy Cost: $6.21/hr
Nameplate RPM: 1775 rpm
VFD: 42hz
Remarks
Percent of Rated Motor Load: 34%
Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot:560.71
Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$84.11
Overall Plant Efficiency: 45.24%
Water Horsepower. 25.11 hp
Run Hours: 1000
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your pump, the results shown may not describe the pump's normal performance.

This pump has an adequate test section.

Well was running at start of test. Recovered water level based on 5 minutes recovery, well could still be recovering.

This pump had a magnetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Page 382 ends

Inc.
-
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 16

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 318833
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Floway
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level, Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor Load%
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (%)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID: PT-28910
PT-28910
Utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0.15
Motor Serial: K0582001260-005R-05
Amps: 171.00
NameplateRPM: 1775
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1 Test2

88.20 75.10
108 108
108.00 108.00
34 36
203.74 173.48
142.00 144.00
345.742 317.481
798.00 848.00
840.00 871.00

23.47 23.56

3.53 3.75

88.5 85.3
118.63 114.34

72.8 70.1
1619 1619

54.00 52.00
602.31 546.3

58.7 59.5

13.28 12.8

69.67 67.99
0 0
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
Meter kH: 1.80
Meter Const: 40
Horsepower: 150. 00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter:

Test 3

51.70 108
108.00

20.5 119.43 128.50
247.927
401.00 439.00

19.56 1.77

41.4 55.5
34 1619

42.20 560.71

45.2 6.21

25.11 0

Page 383 ends

<•~rvices, Inc.

Customer Name:

Location:

Date:

Run Number
Notes:

City of Livingston
Well13
9/18/2024
PSI
67 GPM
1151
RPM
1632
Vibration Analysis
Hertz
55 VFO
Yes
Highest
Vibration level

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
OK
Passed
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
Axial = Down shaft
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Measurement
Locatic;>n
Motor Bottom Axial

Page 384 ends

Inc.
----
Overall Vibration Report
Date I Time:Sep 18, 2024 14:03:50 PM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.1108 ips
00000

0.1120 ips
00000

0.0849 ips
00000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 13 .b . . . . V1 ration units 1n:1ps

0.0639 ips
00000

0.0602 ips

0.0000

0.0573 ips
C· (H)(l(1

Page 1 ends
Page 385 ends

Point H1

0.0263 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CHl: 0.0849 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
]0 0
ANSI HI 96.4
Vibration Allowable
Value
U'/tl7

0.0849
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 386 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H2

0.1310 ips
.

O Marker
I Auto I Ir ouch 11 RMs11
CH1: 0.1108 ips RMS
I

60.0 kCPM
000
ANSI Ht 96.4
Vibrat,ori Allowable
Value
O.'.l<l7
-
0 .1108
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 387 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V1

0.0252 ips CH1: 0.0582 ips R~-
0 Marker 60,0 kCPM
[0j I Auto] (1-ouchj I RMS, 0~0
ANSI HI 9 .64
V bratior\ Altowable
Value
0 './<17
0 .0573
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 388 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2

0.0760 ips
l
0 Marker
I Auto I jrouch 11 RMsj
CH1: 0.0587 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
'
~~100,
ANSI HI 9 .6 .4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0602
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 389 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1

0.0172 ips
0 Marker
§j j Auto I Ir ouch I ! RMsj
CH1: 0.1120 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
00 0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.1120
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 390 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A2

0.0095 ips
0 Marker
I Auto I lrouch I J AMs
1 1
CH1: 0.0635 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
0 ~0
ANSI HI 96.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0639
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 391 ends

•i•Bfi•oervices, Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAUPROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 200.00 Plan • Well :17
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28911
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 1
Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 776
Estimated Total kWh 104,303
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $15.65
Cost Per Acre Ft. $116.39
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 134.42
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 39.6%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $15,645.43

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
445.3
59,862
$0.15
$25.91
$66.8
134.42
1,000.00
69%
$8,979.27

SAVINGS
330.60
44,441
$49.59
$6,666.16
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 392 ends

Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.oom
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 17 - Run 1
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 200.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318791 Volts/Amps: 460V/222.00A Senal#:X0420151494-0001R0001 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Gould Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-72~793 Dnve Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 110.00 ft Run Number: 1 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 139.80 ft Measured Flow: 730 gpm Drawdown: 29.8 ft Customer Flow: 737 gpm
Yield: 24.5 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 1.81 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 69.50 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 3.23 Discharge Level: 160.55 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 1.63 ft Total Lift: 300.35 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 139.81 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 66% Brake Horsepower: 132.82 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 775.96 Kilowatt Input to Motor: 104.3 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot: $116. 39 Energy Cost: $15.65/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 39.6%
Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 55.37 hp
VFD: 54hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma):'. not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Pume started for test, eumeina water level could still be drawina down.

This eume hact a maanetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiency of this plant is considered to be very low assuming this run represents plant's normal operating condition.

Water Levels measured with customer's transducer

Page 393 ends

Inc.
- Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto. CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 200.00 Plant: Well 17
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28911
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 2
Thursday, Sep 19, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during the pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be Improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 537.9
Estimated Total kWh 143,604
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $21.54
Cost Per Acre Ft. $80.68
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 266.99
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 56.2%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $21,540.59

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
438.1
116,980
$0.15
$25.91 $65.72
266.99
1,000.00
69%
$17,546.93

SAVINGS

99.70 26,624
*
$14.96
$3,993.66
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 394 ends

Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Well 17 - Run 2
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 200.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318791 Volts/Amps: 460V/222.00A Serial#:X0420151494--0001R0001 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Gould Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water Level (SWL): 110.00 ft Run Number. 2 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 148.80 ft Measured Flow: 1450 gpm Drawdown: 38.8 ft Customer Flow: 1464 gpm
Yield: 37.37 gpmltt Flow Velocity: 3.59 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 63.50 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr: 6.42 Discharge Level: 146.69 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 3.23 ft Total Lift: 295.49 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 192.49 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load:91% Brake Horsepower: 182.87 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 537 .86 Kilowatt Input to Motor. 143.6 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$80.68 Energy Cost: $21.54/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 56.21 % Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 108.2 hp
VFD: 59hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the lime of the lest. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown mal not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Vibration Anallsis was eerformed on this eume.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

Based on information obtained at the time the test was performed, this test represents the pumps standard operating conditions.

This eume had a magnetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficiencl of this elant is considered to be low assuming this run reeresents elanl's normal oeerating condition.

Water Levels measured with customer's transducer

Page 395 ends

Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209 527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com

CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
SUBJECT: PUMPING COST ANALYSIS
HP: 200.00 Plant: Well 17
PUMP TEST REFERENCE NUMBER: PT-28911
PUMP TEST RUN: Run 3
Thursday. Sep 19, 2024
The following Pumping Cost Analysis is presented as an aid to your cost accounting. This analysis is an estimate prepared from operating criteria supplied from the pump test performed Sep 18 2024 and information provided by you during !he pump test.

It is recommended and assumed that:
• Overall plant efficiency can be improved to: 69%
• Water requirements will be the same as for the past year • All operating conditions (annual hours of operation, discharge head, and water pumping level) will remain the same as they were at the time of the pump test

EXISTING
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
kWh/AF 575.5
Estimated Total kWh 140,404
Average Cost per kWh $0.15
Average Cost per hour $21.06
Cost Per Acre Ft. $86.32
Estimated Acre Ft. Per Year 243.98
Run Hours 1,000.00
Overall Plant Efficiency 54.7%
Estimated Total Annual Cost $21,060.58

IMPROVED
PLANT

EFFICIENCY
455.8
111,211
$0.15
$25.91 $68.37
243.98
1,000.00
69%
$16,681.59

SAVINGS
119.70
29,193
$17.95
$4,379.00
It is sincerely hoped that this information will prove helpful to you, and that your concerns over maintaining optimum pumping efficiency will be continued. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Power at (209) 527-2908.

Regards,
William Thomas Power, Ill
Enclosures

Page 396 ends

Inc.

Report ID: PT-28911
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527 .2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Agricultural and Domestic Pump Test Report
City of Livingston - Welt 17 - Run 3
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation:

Test Date: Sep 18 2024 Tester: Bill Power Nameplate HP: 200.00 Customer Information Power Company Data Equipment Data
City of Livingston MID Motor Make: U.S.
1416 C Street Meter#: 318791 Volts/Amps: 460V/222.00A Serial#:X0420151494--0001R0001 Livingston, CA 95334 Rate Schedule: MID Pump Make: Gould Contact: Jesus Chavez Average Cost: $0.15 Pump Type: Turbine Cell: 209-720-8793 Drive Type: Electric Motor Gearhead Make:

Hydraulic Data Flow Data
Standing Water J-evel (SWL): 1 10.00 ft Run Number: 3 of 3 Pumping Water Level (PWL): 147.10 ft Measured Flow: 1325 gpm Drawdo.,vn: 37.1 ft Customer Flow: 1334 gpm
Yield: 35.71 gpm/ft Flow Velocity: 3.28 ft/sec
Discharge Pressure: 69.40 PSI Acre Feet per 24 Hr:5.86
Discharge Level: 160.31 ft Cubic Feet Per Second (CFS): 2.95 ft Total Lift: 307.41 ft
Water Source: Well
Power Data
Horsepower Input to Motor: 188.2 hp Percent of Rated Motor Load: 89% Brake Horsepower: 178. 79 hp Kilowatt Hours per Acre Foot: 575.48 Kilowatt Input to Motor.140.4 kW Cost to Pump an Acre Foot:$86.32 Energy Cost: $21.06/hr Overall Plant Efficiency: 54.65% Nameplate RPM: 1780 rpm Water Horsepower. 102.86 hp
VFD: 57hz Run Hours: 1000
Remarks
All results are based on conditions during the time of the test. If these conditions vary from the normal operation of your eume, the results shown ma~ not describe the eume's normal eerformance.

This eume has an adeguate test section.

Pume started for test, eumeing water level could still be drawing down.

This eume had a magnetic flow meter.

HPI measured with direct read KWI.

Overall efficienc:t'. of this elant is considered to be low assuming this run reeresents elant's normal oeerating condition.

Water Levels measured with customer's transducer

Page 397 ends

Inc.

Jesus Chavez
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
Pump Name: Well 17

HYDRAULIC TEST RESULTS
Tester: Bill Power
Meter#: 318791
Annual Run Hrs: 1000
Motor Make: U.S.

Volts: 460
Gearhead Make:

Pump Make: Gould
Water Source: Well
Results Discharge Pressure, PSI
Standing Water Level, Feet
Recovered Water Level
Drawdown, Feet Discharge Head, Feet Pumping Water Level, Feet Total Measured Head, Feet
Measured GPM
Customer Meter, GPM
Well Yield, GPM/ft Drawdown
Acre Feet Pumped in 24 Hours
kW Input to Motor
HP Input to Motor
Motor load%
Measured Speed of Pump, RPM
VFD, Hz:
kWh per Acre Foot
Overall Plant Efficiency (¾)
Energy Cost per Hour
Water Horsepower, hp
Flow Velocity, ft/sec
Report ID· PT-28911
PT-28911
Utility: MID
Rate Sched: MID
Avg Cost kWh: $0.15
6301 Bearden Lane
Modesto, CA 95357
209.527.2908
fax
cal.powerhydrodynamics.com
Test Date: Sep 18 2024
MeterkH: 1.80
Meter Const: 60
Motor Serial: X0420151494-0001 R0001
Amps: 222.00
NameplateRPM: 1780
Horsepower: 200.00
Drive Type: Electric Motor
Pipe Diameter: 12.84
Pump Type: Turbine
Test 1 Test 2 Test 3

69.50 63.50 69.40
110 110 110

0.00 0.00 0.00

29.8 38.8 37.1
160.55 146.69 160.31 139.80 148.80 147.10
300.345 295.485 307.414
730.00 1450.00 1325.00 737.00 1464.00 1334.00

24.5 37.37 35.71

3.23 6.42 5.86
104.3 143.6 140.4
139.81 192.49 188.2

66.4 91.4 89.4
1614 1747 1691

54.30 58.90 57.00
775.96 537.86 575.48

39.6 56.2 54.7

15.65 21.54 21.06

55.37 108.2 102.86

1.81 3.59 3.28

Page 398 ends

,-►~rvices, Inc.

Vibration Analysis
Customer Name:

Location:

Date:

Run Number
1 Notes:

1. This pump is in the

2. This Pump
City of Livingston
Well 17
9/18/2024
Highest
. PSI -· GPM -· ... . RPM .. ... Hertz VFD Vibration level

69.5 730 1614 - --- ·-· • 54.3 Yes
OK
Passed
Imbalance
stage of the vibration standards set forth in HI 9.6.4
the Vibration Test
Horizontal = inline with discharge
Vertical = 90° off discharge
HI 9.6.4
For Design Point
> .129 in/s rms

0.13 in/s rms

0.2 in/s rms

0.3 in/s rms
Axial = Down shaft
Measurement
Location
Motor Top Vertical

Page 399 ends

Inc.
----
Overall Vibration Report
Date I Time:Sep 18, 2024 13:21:48 PM
Location: City Of Livingston
Notes

0.0763 ips
00000

0.0268 ips
00000

0.0633 ips

0.0000
Staff Name: Bill Power
Machine ID: Well 17 'b . ·t . . V1 ration urn s m:1ps

0.0251 ips
00000

0.0843 ips
,: (,(,(1(,

0.0385 ips
r, ( (1(,

Page 1 ends
Page 400 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point H1

0.0706 ips
...
0 Marker tJ FFT 'I I Auto I Ir ouch I I RMS11
CH1: 0.0650 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
00 0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0633
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H1

Page 2 ends
Page 401 ends

Point H2

0.0962 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1: 0.0741 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
~00
ANSI HI 9 ,6.4
V brat1or, AUow.:ib le
Value

0.0763
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point H2

Page 3 ends
Page 402 ends

Point V1

0.0489 ips
Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
CH1: 0.0420 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
IGJ00
ANSI HI 9.6A
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0385
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V1

Page 4 ends
Page 403 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point V2

0.1172 ips CH1: 0.0830 ips R ...
0 Marker 60.0 kCPM
L I Auto I lrouch l I RMs11 0 0 0
ANSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0843
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point V2

Page 5 ends
Page 404 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A1

0.0244 ips
o Marker
[§j I Auto~ 1 lrouch l I RMs1J
CH1: 0.0330 ips R ...

60.0 kCPM
000
IINSI HI 9.6.4
Vibration Allowable
Value

0.0268
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A1

Page 6 ends
Page 405 ends

Overall Vibration Report - Attachments
Point A2

0.0218 ips
O Marker
I Auto I f Touch f [ RMs1 1
CH1: 0.0271 ips RMS

60.0 kCPM
0 0 0
ANSI HI 96 4
Vibration Allowable
Value
0 /52

0.0251
Vibration Spectrum/Time-Waveform for point A2

Page 7 ends
Page 406 ends

WATER/WASTEWATER EQUIPMENT ASSESSMENT
April2024
Failures in water system since January 2023-please itemize by piece of infrastructure and date.

EQUIPMENT DATE ISSUE
WELL 14 March 2023 SUBMERSIBLE MOTOR FAILED
WELL 13 June 2023 BOWL REPLACEMENT/AIR UFT
WELL 12 January 2024 TURBINE MOTOR FAILED
WELL 13 April2024 MOTOR LEADS/REPLACED LEADS
Synopsis of water supply conditions and reliability of current system:
conditions from summer 2023, winter 2023, spring 2024, projections for summer 2024.

Overall, our water system can maintain system pressure during the fall, winter, and spring seasons. During the summer months the water system has difficulty meeting the system's peak water demand. Even when all our source wells are operating in a state of good repair during the summer months, when demand is at its highest our water department staff must utilize the 1-million-gallon storage tank to maintain system pressure during peak demand hours and fill the tank overnight during watering days. If two well sites go into backwash at the same time, this will cause low pressure within the system until filters complete their automated backwash cycle.

The city's water system equipment is put under a lot of stress due to the constant high demand for water and little to no rest. The system has been experiencing equipment failures annually that range from motor failure, bowl/column pipe failure, electrical control failures and plugging of perforations. The water system is in desperate need of additional water sources and the addition of storage to enhance reliability. Because of the high-water demand all the city wells run constantly during summertime and when you run equipment that hard mechanical parts wear faster.

During the fall, winter and spring months the water system has been able to meet water demand. It is during the hotter summer months that our water operators have difficulty meeting the demand. As the city continues to add more water connections, it will come to a point that we will have difficulty meeting the demand during spring and experience longer periods of low water pressure in the system during high demand periods during summer months if new water sources are not drilled.

Page 407 ends

Findings of water and wastewater supply assessment and system condition-itemize based on piece of infrastructure.

The assessment is not completed, the following table is a draft assessment based on inspections and operator information.

Lift Station Name Priority Notes
Briarwood LS High Needs complete renovation
Narada LS Low Replace 1 pump
Rancho Estrada Low Ok
LS
99LS Medium Partially renovated
Peach LS High Needs complete renovation
Dwight LS Low One pump needs replacement
Walnut LS Low Renovated 2018
"I" Street LS Med/High Needs two new pumps
Headworks LS Med/High Needs new motor control center, vfd's, isolation Gates.

Hammatt LS High Needs complete renovation
Well Name Priority Notes Well8 High Oldest well, in replacement process Well9 High 2nd oldest well, needs replacement. Well11 High Only produces 400-500 gpm, pumps sand. Well 12 Low Good producing well Well 13 Low Good producing well Well 14 Low Good producing well Well 15 Not used Out of service due to elevated Mn and As, 500 gpm
Well 16 Low Good producing well, needs new flow meter Well 17 Low Newest well, put in service 2016, 1750 gpm Additional notes:

Page 408 ends

Well #8 - this well is the oldest well in the system and has experienced casing failures in the past. It is not a long term reliable well. New well #Ba is the planned replacement well.

Well #9-this well is the second oldest well in the system and is planned to be replaced by new well 18. During summer, the production of this well must be reduced from 950 gpm to approximately 700 gpm to alleviate the problem of breaking suction.

Staff had the well screening cleaned, developed and airlifted but it continues to experience the same problem during the summer.

Well #11 - This is a low producing well due to sanding issues. It produces approximately 300-500 gpm. New well 19 is the planned replacement.

Well #12- good producing well. within the last year the motor has failed and has been replaced.

Well #13- good producing well. Within the last year the bowls and column piping have been replaced. The well screens have been cleaned and airlifted.

Well #14- good producing well. Within the last year the submersible pump has been replaced along with some column piping. The screens were cleaned and airlifted.

Well #15- not used due to elevated manganese and arsenic. It can be used in an emergency, but we may have to send out arsenic violation notices to residents if it exceeds mcl. There also may be colored water complaints from businesses and nearby residents from the elevated manganese. The city does not own the lot that the well sits on.

Well #16- good producing well. This well site treats water from both well 14 and well

16. New bowls and column piping were installed in late 2020 early 2021. The screens were cleaned and airlifted. The flow meter needs to be replaced.

Well #17 - good producing well and largest producing well. The well was put into service in 2016. It was designed to pump 2000 gpm, but operations staff had to dial back to 1,750 gpm to keep the motor from overloading.

Page 409 ends

Christopher Lopez
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Good morning,
Mario Gouveia <[email protected]>
Thursday, December 12, 2024 8:52 AM
Christopher Lopez; Noe Martinez; Anthony Chavarria; Miguel Galvez; Martha Abeloe; City of Livingston - Building Inspector
Happy Bains; rsantos
RE: Steve Bassi Projects
To my knowledge, there are no changes regarding additional water system capacity.

Thank you.

Mario B. Gouveia, P.E.

President
Gouveia Engineering, Inc.

Tel: (209) 854-3300
www.gouveiaengineering.com
From: Christopher Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 4:04 PM
To: Mario Gouveia <[email protected]>; Noe Martinez <[email protected]>; Anthony Chavarria <[email protected]>; Miguel Galvez <[email protected]>; Martha Abeloe <[email protected]>; City of Livingston - Building Inspector <[email protected]> Cc: Happy Bains <[email protected]>; rsantos <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Steve Bassi Projects
Good afternoon,
I am confirming that as of 12/11/2024, I received no additional information regarding additional capacity for new development projects for the City of Livingston.

Thank you.

Christopher Lopez City of Livingston
From: Christopher Lopez
Sent: Thursday, December S, 2024 5:44 PM
To: Mario Gouveia <[email protected]>; Noe Martinez <[email protected]>; Anthony Chavarria <[email protected]>; Miguel Galvez <[email protected]>; Martha Abeloe <[email protected]>; City of Livingston - Building Inspector <[email protected]> Cc: Happy Bains <[email protected]>; Roy C. Santos <[email protected]> Subject: Steve Bassi Projects
Importance: High
Good afternoon,

Page 410 ends

I had a conversation with Steve Bassi this morning in reference to a can and will serve letter he is requesting from the City. He inquired why it is taking so long for staff to provide the letter.

I told him that I recently received a draft memo from Public Works (attached) identifying that there is no current available water capacity at this moment in time, and that is why staff has been unable to provide him this letter.

He then stated that during the last two water Ad-Hoc meetings, staff had made statements telling the Ad-Hoc that the City could provide previously entitled projects with water and these were factored into the City's calculations, so he did not understand why the City does not have enough water now. He stated that it was his belief that based on these statements, there would be no issue in receiving a can and will serve letter from the city.

Since our water issues are well noted and well documented, we should be completely transparent with our system limitations, issues, challenges, and facts. I am including two additional attachments to remind everyone of the challenges plaguing our system. These have been provided previously during an April 30, 2024 meeting with the City Attorney, Public Works, Engineering, CD, Mayor Moran, and Mayor Pro Tem Samra.

If there is any information that illustrates we have additional water capacity available, or that supports the idea that we have the ability to provide can and will serve letters, please share it with everyone on this email by 12/6/2024.

Thank you.

Christopher Lopez
City of Livingston
2

Page 411 ends

Christopher Lopez
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Anthony Chavarria
Thursday, December 12, 2024 10:32 AM
Christopher Lopez; Mario Gouveia; Noe Martinez; Miguel Galvez; Martha Abeloe; City of Livingston - Building Inspector
Happy Bains; rsantos
RE: Steve Bassi Projects
Confirmed, nothing new has changed.
<fln.t/a.o"IJ. eAava'l'lla
Director of Public Works
City of Livingston
Office (209) 394-8044
Fax (209) 394-7296
[email protected]
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipients, please contact the sender by reply e-mail or phone and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Christopher Lopez <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 4:04 PM
To: Mario Gouveia <[email protected]>; Noe Martinez <[email protected]>; Anthony Chavarria <[email protected]>; Miguel Galvez <[email protected]>; Martha Abeloe <[email protected]>; City of Livingston - Building Inspector <[email protected]> Cc: Happy Bains <[email protected]>; rsantos <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Steve Bassi Projects
Good afternoon,
I am confirming that as of 12/11/2024, I received no additional information regarding additional capacity for new development projects for the City of Livingston.

Thank you.

Christopher Lopez City of Livingston

Page 412 ends

From: Christopher Lopez
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 5:44 PM
To: Mario Gouveia <[email protected]>; Noe Martinez <[email protected]>; Anthony Chavarria <[email protected]>; Miguel Galvez <[email protected]>; Martha Abeloe <[email protected]>; City of Livingston - Building Inspector <[email protected]> Cc: Happy Bains <[email protected]>; Roy C. Santos <rsantos(@awattorneys.com> Subject: Steve Bassi Projects
Importance: High
Good afternoon,
I had a conversation with Steve Bassi this morning in reference to a can and will serve letter he is requesting from the City. He inquired why it is taking so long for staff to provide the letter.

I told him that I recently received a draft memo from Public Works (attached) identifying that there is no current available water capacity at this moment in time, and that is why staff has been unable to provide him this letter.

He then stated that during the last two water Ad-Hoc meetings, staff had made statements telling the Ad-Hoc that the City could provide previously entitled projects with water and these were factored into the City's calculations, so he did not understand why the City does not have enough water now. He stated that it was his belief that based on these statements, there would be no issue in receiving a can and will serve letter from the city.

Since our water issues are well noted and well documented, we should be completely transparent with our system limitations, issues, challenges, and facts. I am including two additional attachments to remind everyone of the challenges plaguing our system. These have been provided previously during an April 30, 2024 meeting with the City Attorney, Public Works, Engineering, CD, Mayor Moran, and Mayor Pro Tern Samra.

If there is any information that illustrates we have additional water capacity available, or that supports the idea that we have the ability to provide can and will serve letters, please share It with everyone on this email by 12/6/2024.

Thank you.

Christopher Lopez
City of Livingston
2

Page 413 ends

DATE: September 18, 2023
TO: Technical Review Board
FROM: Meg Prince, Senior Planner

MERCED COUNTY

ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS
PH: 209.723.3153
FAX: 209.723.0322
www.mcagov.org
369 W. 1sth Street
Merced, CA 95340
ITEM 5a
RE: Action - Adopt the Final Merced County Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

SUMMARY
In March 2022, the Governing Board approved a recommendation made by the Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) Work Group to use REAP 1 funds to conduct a water and sewer infrastructure capacity assessment for the seven jurisdictions. MCAG contracted with MKN & Associates in the amount of $208,153 to complete the assessment, which has been reviewed by member jurisdictions and finalized.

MCAG utilized a portion of its Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) 1.0 funding to develop the Study.

The State's REAP 1.0 Guidelines require that any planning document developed with the funding be formally adopted. As such, MCAG is requesting that the Governing Board adopt the Final Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment.

REQUESTED ACTION
Recommend the MCAG Governing Board adopt the Final Merced County Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment.

BACKGROUND
In the 2019-20 California budget, Governor Gavin Newsom allocated $250 million for all regions, cities, and counties for the preparation, adoption, and implementation of plans and processes that accelerate housing production and facilitate compliance in implementing the sixth cycle of the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA). From that allocation, $125 million was used to establish the REAP 1.0 Program, administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to allocate formula funding to councils of governments.

Through this process, MCAG was allocated $1,008,343 in REAP 1.0 funds, with some being dedicated to this Study, a Sewer and Water Infrastructure Capacity Assessment, Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Need Allocation Plan, and the Multijurisdictional Housing Element.

PAST ACTION TAKEN
I March 2022 I MCAG Governing Board approved the REAP 1 funding allocation table. 226

Page 414 ends

July 2022

DISCUSSION
MCAG Governing Board authorized MCAG to enter into a contract with MKN Associates to prepare a Merced County Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment.

Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG) has obtained grant funding from California's Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) program to help local agencies plan for future housing needs by accelerating housing growth. MCAG is using a portion of this funding to evaluate existing water and sewer infrastructure throughout the six cities located within Merced County (County) and areas throughout the County that have opportunities for housing development. MCAG retained MKN and Associates, Inc. (MKN) to complete a water and sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity assessment for water systems within Merced County to assist with this evaluation and assist with a determination of each municipality's capacity to add additional housing units. MKN has completed a high-level desktop evaluation of the wastewater collection systems of the six major cities and four independent sewer districts within the County. This report summarizes MKN's efforts in the following areas:
• Data research and gathering efforts including the information used as the basis of the assessment;
• Methodology used for the assessment of the existing water and sewer systems; • Evaluation of the capacity of each system to accommodate more housing based on the existing conditions;
• Comparison of the capacity evaluation results with the Merced County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan housing unit totals;
• Recommended projects by City and independent district.

Staff of local jurisdictions have reviewed and commented on the draft analysis. As a requirement of the REAP 1.0 funding used for this Study, MCAG must formally adopt the planning document. As such, MCAG is requesting that the Governing Board adopt the Final Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed action does not impact the MCAG budget.

STAFF CONTACT
Meg Prince, Senior Planner, at (209) 769-7679 or [email protected]

ATTACHMENTS
Final Merced County Water and Sewer Infrastructure Capacity Assessment 227

Page 415 ends

MERCED COUNTY

ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS

MERCED COUNTY WATER AND

SANITARY SEWER

INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY

ASSESSMENT
09/26/2023
PREPARED FOR:

MERCED COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
369 w. 181H STREET
MERCED, CA 95340
209.723.3153
PREPARED BY:

MKN & ASSOCIATES
8405 N. FRESNO ST, STE. 120
FRESNO, CA 93720
559.500.4750

Page 416 ends

mb,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ......................................................................................... 1-2

1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-2

2.0 RESEARCH AND DATA GATHERING ................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 2-1

3.0 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 3-1

3.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3-1

3.2 Water Supply Capacity Analysis Methodology ...................................................................... 3-1

3.2.1 City of Atwater Water Supply vs Demand Assessment. ................................................. 3-1 3.2.2 City of Gustine Water Supply vs Demand Assessment.. ................................................ 3-2 3.2.3 City of Livingston Water Supply vs. Demand Assessment.. ........................................... 3-3 3.2.4 City of Los Banos Water Supply vs. Demand Assessment ............................................ 3-4

3.2.5 City of Merced Water Supply vs. Demand Assessment ................................................. 3-5

3.3 Water Distribution System Capacity ...................................................................................... 3-7

3.3.1 Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................... 3-7

3.3.2 City of Atwater Water Distribution System Capacity Analysis ......................................... 3-8

3.3.3 City of Gustine Water Distribution System Capacity Analysis ...................................... 3-13

3.3.4 City of Livingston Water Distribution System Analysis ................................................. 3-15

3.3.5 City of Los Banos Water Distribution System Analysis ................................................. 3-20

3.3.6 City of Merced Water Distribution System Analysis ..................................................... 3-25

4.0 SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................... 4-1

4.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4-1

4.2 Sanitary Sewer Capacity Analysis ........................................................................................ 4-1

4.2.1 City of Atwater Treatment Capacity vs. Sewer Loading Assessment ............................. 4-1

4.2.2 City of Gustine Treatment Capacity vs. Sewer Loading Assessment.. ........................... 4-2

4.2.3 City of Livingston Treatment Capacity vs. Sewer Loading Assessment ......................... 4-2

4.2.4 City of Los Banos Treatment Capacity vs. Sewer Loading Assessment ......................... 4-2

4.2.5 City of Merced Treatment Capacity vs. Sewer Loading Assessment ............................. 4-3

4.3 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis ........................................................... 4-4

4.3.1 Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................... 4-4

4.3.2 City of Atwater Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis ............................ 4-5

4.3.3 City of Gustine Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis .......................... 4-1 O

4.3.4 City of Livingston Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis ...................... 4-12

4.3.5 City of Los Banos Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis ...................... 4-17

4.3.6 City of Merced Sanitary Sewer Collection System Capacity Analysis .......................... 4-22 Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page Ii
229

Page 417 ends

m~,

4.4 Independent 0}stricts .......................................................................................................... 4-23

4.4.1 Delhi County Water District.. ........................................................................................ 4-23

4.4.2 Hitmar County Water District ........................................................................................ 4-24

4.4.3 Pfanada Community Services District .......................................................................... 4-24

4.4.4 Winton Water and Sanitary District .............................................................................. 4-24

5.0 RECOMMENDED PROJECTS ................................................................................................ 5-1

5.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 5-1

5.2 City of Atwater Recommendations ........................................................................................ 5-1

5.3 City of Dos Palos Recommendations .................................................................................... S.1

5.4 City of Gustine Recommendations ........................................................................................ S.-2

5.5 City of Livingston Recommendations .................................................................................... 5•2

5. 7 City of Merced Recommendations ........................................................................................ 5--3

5.8 Independent Drstricts Recommendations .............................................................................. 5-4

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3·1: City of .Atwater Supply vs Demand ..................................................................................... 3-2 Table 3-2: City of Gustine Supply vs. Demand .................................................................................... 3-3 Tabte 3-3: City of Living&ton Supply vs. Demand ................................................................................ 3-4 Table 3-4: City of Los Banos Supply vs. Demand ............................................................................... 3-6 Table 3-5: City of Merced Suppty vs. Demand .................................................................................... 3-6 Tabfe 4-1: Wastewater Treatment Capacity - Atwater ......................................................................... 4-1 Table 4-2: Wastewater Treatment Capacity - Gustine ......................................................................... 4-2 Table 4-3: wastewater Treatment Capacity - Livingston ..................................................................... 4-2 Table +4: Wastewater Treatment Capacity - Los Banos .................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-5: Wastewater Treatment Capacity • Merced ......................................................................... 4-3

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1: City of .Atwater Supply Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario ..................................... 3-9 Figure 3-2: City of Atwater Supply Capability for Northern Growth Scenario ..................................... 3-1 O Figure 3-3: City of Atwater Supply Capability for Southern Growth Scenario .................................... 3-11 Figure 3-4: City of Atwater Supply Capability for Eastern Growth Scenario ....................................... 3-12 Figure 3-5: City of Gustine Supply Capability for Southern Growth Scenario .................................... 3-14 Figure 3-6: City of livingstson Supply Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario .............................. 3-16 Figure 3-7: City of Livingston Supply Capability for Eastern Growth Scenario ................................... 3-17 Figure 3-8: City of Livingston Supply Capability for Western Growth Scenario .................................. 3-18 Figure 3-9: City of Livingston Supply Capability for Southern Growth Scenario ................................ 3-19 Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page I ii
230

Page 418 ends

mk~,
Figure 3-10: City of Los Banos Supply Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario ............................. 3-21 Figure 3-11: City of Los Banos Supply Capability for Northern Growth Scenario .............................. 3-22 Figure 3-12: City of Los Banos Supply Capability for Northwest Growth Scenario ............................ 3-23 Figure 3-13: City of Los Banos Supply Capability for Southern Growth Scenario .............................. 3-24 Figure 3-14: City of Merced Supply Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario .................................. 3-26 Figure 3-15: City of Merced Supply Capability for Northern Growth Scenario ................................... 3-27 Figure 3-16: City of Merced Supply Capability for Easterm Growth Scenario .................................... 3-28 Figure 3-17: City of Merced Supply Capability for Western Growth Scenario .................................... 3-29 Figure 4-1: City of Atwater Collection System Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario .................... 4-6 Figure 4-2: City of Atwater Collection System Capability for Northern Growth Scenario ...................... 4-7 Figure 4-3: City of Atwater Collection System Capability for Southern Growth Scenario ..................... 4-8 Figure 4-4: City of Atwater Collection System Capability for Eastern Growth Scenario ....................... 4-9 Figure 4-5: City of Gustine Collection System Capability for Southern Growth Scenario ................... 4-11 Figure 4-6: City of Livingston Collection System Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario .............. 4-13 Figure 4-7: City of Livingston Collection System Capability for Eastern Growth Scenario ................. 4-14 Figure 4-8: City of Livingston Collection System Capability for Western Growth Scenario ................ 4-15 Figure 4-9: City of Livingston Collection System Capability for Southern Growth Scenario ............... 4-16 Figure 4-10: City of Los Banos Collection System Capability for City-Wide Growth Scenario ........... 4-18 Figure 4-11: City of Los Banos Collection System Capability for Northern Growth Scenario ............. 4-19 Figure 4-12: City of Los Banos Collection System Capability for Western Growth Scenario ............. 4-20 Figure 4-13: City of Los Banos Collection System Capability for Southern Growth Scenario ............ 4-21 Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page I iii
231

Page 419 ends

Table of Abbreviations
AFY
CIP
d/D

GPCD GPD GPM GSP
LAFCo MCAG
MGD
MKN
MSR

REAP RHNA

SMP SSMP
UWMP

WCSMP WMP
WWTF
Acre Foot per Year
Capital Improvement Project
Depth-to-Diameter
Gallons per Capita Day
Gallons per Day Gallons per Minute Groundwater Sustainability Plan Local Agency Formation Commission Merced County Association of Governments Million Gallons per Day MKN & Associates
Municipal Service Review
Regional Early Action Planning Program Regional Housing Needs Allocation Sewer Master Plan
Sewer System Management Plan
Urban Water Management Plan
Wastewater Collection System Master Plan
Water Master Plan
Wastewater Treatment Facility
Merced County Association of Governments Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment mk~,
Page I iv
232

Page 420 ends

mk~,

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

1.1 Introduction
Merced County Association of Governments (MCAG) has obtained grant funding from California's Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) program. The REAP program helps local agencies plan for future housing needs by accelerating housing growth. MCAG is using a portion of their funding to evaluate existing water and sewer infrastructure throughout the six cities located within Merced County (County) and areas throughout the County that have opportunities for housing development.

MCAG retained MKN and Associates, Inc. (MKN) to complete a water and sanitary sewer infrastructure capacity assessment for water systems within Merced County to assist with this evaluation and assist with a determination of each municipality's capacity to add additional housing units. MKN has completed a high-level desktop evaluation of the water systems of the six (6) major cities and four (4) independent water districts within the County. This report summarizes MKN's efforts in the following areas:
• Data research and gathering efforts including the information used as the basis of the assessment;
• Methodology used for the assessment of the existing water and sewer systems; • Evaluation of the capacity of each system to accommodate more housing based on the existing conditions;
• Comparison of the capacity evaluation results with the Merced County Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Plan housing unit totals;
• Identify recommended infrastructure improvement projects for each City and independent district.

Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page I 1-2
233

Page 421 ends

2.0 RESEARCH AND DATA GATHERING

2.1 Summary
This section summarizes the information obtained from the cities and agencies within Merced County. For each agency, MKN attempted to obtain the following documents:
• Water Master Plan
• Sewer Master Plan
• Wastewater Treatment Plant r,NWTP) Facility Plan
• Urban Water Management Plan
• General Plan • Housing Elements • Capital Improvement Plan • Groundwater Sustainability Plan • Atlas mapping (GIS or CAD) and/or hydraulic models of water distribution and wastewater collection systems
Initial data gathering was completed by researching each agency's websites for access to necessary planning documents. Following our initial data gathering efforts, MKN contacted various City and agency staff via email and phone to obtain documents that may be available but not posted on the agency websites. MKN also conducted in-person and virtual meetings with various Cities/agencies to discuss our efforts and obtain additional information from various personnel during the meetings.

MKN also contacted Merced County Public Works and Merced County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) to obtain information about independent special districts that may have water and wastewater infrastructure.

The following list summarizes MKN's data research and gathering efforts by City/agency:

Atwater
Documents Received:
• 2019 Water Master Plan, Prepared by AECOM (Note: Reports were provided but the City indicated only the findings on the existing system are reliable. All findings and projections for future scenarios are not accurate).
• 2018 Sewer Master Plan, Prepared by AECOM (Note: Reports were provided but the City indicated onty the findings on the existing system are reliable. All findings and projections for future scenarios are not accurate).
• 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Prepared by Blackwater Consulting Engineers Inc. • 2020 General Plan, Prepared by Pacific Municipal Consultants, but the City indicated this Plan is obsolete.
• 2014 Housing Element, Prepared by City of Atwater
• 2022 Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, Prepared by Woodard & Curran
Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

Page 12 ends

234

Page 422 ends

Missing Documents/Information:
• Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan
• Capital Improvement Plan
• Atlas Mapping or Hydraulic Models
Dos Palos
Through conversations with MCAG, it is understood that the City of Dos Palos currently does not have any documentation published that could aid in conducting the infrastructure capacity assessment. As such, Dos Palos will not be included in the assessment sections of this report, but future project recommendations for the City will be included in section 5 of this report.

Documents Received:

N/A
Missing Documents/Information:
• Water Master Plan
• Sanitary Sewer Master Plan • Water/Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan • Urban Water Management Plan • General Plan • Housing Elements • Capital Improvement Plan • Groundwater Sustainability Plan • Hydraulic Models of Potable Distribution & Sewer Collection System Gustine
Documents Received:
• 2002 Water Master Plan, Prepared by Stoddard & Associates • 2003 Sewer Master Plan, Prepared by Larry Walker Associates, Inc • 2002 General Plan, Prepared by City of Gustine • 2019 Housing Elements, Prepared by City of Gustine • 2022 Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Northern ande Central Delta-Mendota Regions, Prepared by Woodard & Curran, Provost and Pritchard Engineering Group • 2007 City of Gustine Water System Infrastructure Map, Prepared by DGR • Atlas mapping of water and sewer systems
Missing Documents/Information:
• Capital Improvement Plan • Atlas mapping or hydraulic models Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

Page 12 ends

235

Page 423 ends

Livingston Documents Received:
• 2007 Water Master Plan, Prepared by Carollo Engineers (Note: Reports were provided, but the City indicated the plans are outdated and should not be relied upon). • 2007 Sewer Master Plan, Prepared by Carollo Engineers (Note: Reports were provided, but the City indicated the plans are outdated and should not be relied upon). • 1992 Sewer Master Plan, Prepared by Lew-Garcia-Davis
• 1992 Water Master Plan, Prepared by Lew-Garcia-Davis
• 2020 Urban Water Management, Prepared by AM Consulting Engineers • 1999 General Plan, Prepared by Quad Knopf
• 2016 Housing Element Update, prepared by City of Livingston • 2022 Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, Prepared by Woodard & Curran
• 2021 Sewer Infrastructure Map, prepared by Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 2014 Water Infrastructure Map, prepared by Gouveia Engineering, Inc. • 2004 Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan, prepared by Carollo Engineering • 2021 Sewer Infrastructure Atlas mapping, Prepared by Gouveia Engineering, Inc Missing Documents/Information:
• Capital Improvement Plan
Los Banos Documents Received:
• 2008 Water Master Plan, prepared by Carollo Engineers (Note: Reports were provided, but the City indicated the plans are outdated and should not be relied upon). • 2008 Sewer Master Plan, prepared by Carollo Engineers (Note: Reports were provided, but the City indicated the plans are outdated and should not be relied upon). • 2008 Storm Drainage Master Plan, prepared by Carollo Engineers • 2019 Sewer System Management Plan, prepared by City of Los Banos • 2020 Urban Water Management, prepared by Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group • 2019 Delta-Mendota Subbasin: Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors GSP Group, prepared by Jarrett Wade Martin, PE • 2019 Water System Infrastructure Map, Prepared by DGR • 2019 Sewer System Infrastructure Map, Prepared by DGR • 2042 Draft General Plan, Prepared by Placeworks Missing Documents/Information:
• Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility Plan
• Capital Improvement Plan
Merced County Association of Governments Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

Page 12 ends

236

Page 424 ends

Merced
Documents Received:
• 2014 Water Master Plan, prepared by AECOM • 2017 Sewer Master Plan, prepared by Stantec • 2020 Urban Water Management plan, prepared by Blackwater Consulting Engineers Inc. • 2012 General Plan, prepared by Quad Knopf
• 2019 Capital Improvement Plan, prepared by Ken Elwin, PE (Direct of Public Works) • 2016-2019 Merced Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, prepared by Woodard & Curran
• 2022-2023 Sewer Master Plan, prepared by Stantec
Missing Documents/Information:
• Hydraulic models of water and sewer systems
Independent Districts (LAFCo)
Documents Received:
• 2020 Merced County Water and Sewer Municipal Service Review, prepared by Economic & Planning Systems Inc.
• 2006 Delhi Community Plan, prepared by RRM Design Group • 2005 Delhi Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), prepared by Adrienne Graham and Associates
• 2008 Hilmar Community Plan, prepared by RRM Design Group • 2007 Hilmar DEIR, Prepared by Adrienne Graham and Associates • 2003 Planada Community Plan (Revised 2017), Prepared by RRM Design Group • 2016 Planada DEIR, prepared by Adrienne Graham and Associates • 2021 Winton Community Plan, prepared by RRM Design Group Missing Documents/Information:

NIA
Merced County Association of Governments Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

Page 12 ends

237

Page 425 ends

3.0 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY

ASSESSMENT

3.1 Summary
mk~,
The water infrastructure capacity assessment focused on each City's water supply capacity and water distribution capability. Since all Cities within Merced County rely 100% on groundwater wells, the water supply capacity assessment compared each City's total well production capacity with the City's water demands on a maximum day demand basis. The water distribution capability assessment consisted of a hydraulic analysis of the water distribution system that examined the amount of additional demand the system can supply to the projected growth areas while maintaining adequate system pressures.

3.2 Water Supoly Capacity Analysis Methodology
For each city, MKN identified the active water supply sources and determined the nominal capacities for each well. Each city's maximum day demand (MOD) was then determined through a review of existing water master plans, urban water management plans, or discussions with Public Works or Engineering staff. The MOD represents a city's highest water demand during a 24-hour period throughout the year. The MDDs are expressed as a multiplier of a city's average day demand and is discussed in each city's respective assessment. The system was then assessed to determine excess capacity through a "worst-case" scenario condition, by comparing the existing total capacity of a system to the MOD conditions. Each system was also analyzed with city's firm capacity which was comparing the city's MOD to the water supply capacity amount that can be delivered with the largest source offline. Additionally, operational storage from existing water storage tanks were not counted as additional supply available for future development because it's unknown whether the storage will be available in the future for domestic demands. In an effort to maintain conservatism in the assessment, the supply capacity only considers well production capacity.

3.2.1 City of Atwater Water Supply vs Demand Assessment The City of Atwater's (Atwater) existing water system consists of nine groundwater wells (8 active, 1 offline). The current eight active wells have the capacity to supply 13,906 gpm. However, since Well 21 supplies water exclusively to University State Prison Atwater, the adjusted total water supply capacity is 12,206 gpm. The firm capacity is 10,000 gpm. According to the 2020 UWMP, the City's 2020 total water use was 5,308 gpm, using an MOD multiplier of 1.9 taken from their WMP their most recent water usage was 10,086 gpm MOD. The City's current supply from groundwater wells meets the City's MOD but is in a deficit when considering firm capacity. The City needs to bring the recently drilled Well 20 online to meet California Water Code requirements for system redundancy and construct additional wells for any future growth.

Additional limiting factors potentially come from the Merced County Subbasin GSP, which defines a sustainable yield of 570,000 AFY to eight (8) entities, of which Atwater is included. However, allocation to each of the eight entities have not been defined yet. Although there is currently no adjudicated sustainable yield for agencies within the Merced County Subbasin, the GSP states the subbasin is being over drafted. Therefore, each groundwater withdrawer within the Basin will likely be required to reduce groundwater withdraw~ls unless the groundwater is replenished through Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page I 3-1
238

Page 426 ends

mW.,
recharge. The summary of Atwater's water supply capacity vs. demand is provided in Table 3-1 below.

Table 3-1: City of Atwater Supply vs. Demand
Source No. Capacity (GPM)
Well No. 13 1,535 Well No. 14 1,750 Well No. 15 1,953 Well No. 16 1,410 Well No. 17 2,200 Well No. 18 1,670 Well No. 19 1,688 Well No. 201 0 Well No. 212 1,700
Total Capacity 12,206
Firm Capacity (Well 17 10,006 offllne)
Max Day Demand (MDD) 10,086
Total Capacity 2,120 Surplus/(Deflclt)
Firm Capacity (80) Su rpl us/(Deflcit)
1 Well has been drilled but not equipped as of March 2023 2 Exclusively supplies water to USP. Capacity is excluded from the totals.

3.2.2 City of Gustine Water Supply vs Demand Assessment The City of Gustine·s potable water distribution system supply consists of 6 total wells (4 active, 1 standby, and 1 in the design process). The City of Gustine's City Engineer, Gouveia Engineering, provided the water systems supply and demand information. The information provided by Gouveia Engineering was used to determine the condition of Gustine's Water System for supply vs demand and hydraulic system assessments due to the planning documents being outdated. According to Gouveia Engineering, the MDD is 1,471 gpm. Gouveia Engineering indicated the active wells for the City have a total capacity to supply 3,200 gpm when all 4 wells are active. The firm capacity is 2,100 gpm, however Gouveia Engineering did indicate that the city has a new well in the design process. The City's current supply from groundwater wells marginally meets the City's MDD when considering firm capacity. The water system needs additional wells for any future growth in order to remain compliant with California Water Code requirements for system redundancy.

The Northern & Central Delta-Mendota GSP states the City of Gustine is over drafting beyond the allocated 400 AFY from the Delta-Mendota Groundwater Subbasin. Therefore, Gustine will likely be required to reduce groundwater withdrawals unless the groundwater is replenished through recharge. The summary of Gustine's water supply capacity is provided in Table 3-2 below.

Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment
Page I 3-2
239

Page 427 ends

Table 3-2: City of Gustine Supply vs. Demand
Source No. Capacity Capacity (gpm)1 (gpm)2
Well No. 1 1100 -
Well No. 4 800 700 Well No. 5 1700 1100 Well No. 6 800 800 Well No. 74 -- 600 Total Capacity 4400 3200
Firm Capacity (Well 5 offllne) 2700 2100
MDD3 1471 1471
Total Capacity
Surplus/( Deficit) 2929 1729
Firm Capacity
Surplusl(Deflclt) 1229 629
1 2002 Water Master Plan
2 Per Gouveia Engineering
3 Based on 2021 water consumption
4 Well 7 replaced Well 1

3.2.3 City of Livingston Water Supply vs. Demand Assessment The City of Livingston's (Livingston) potable water distribution system consists of 7 active wells and a single 1 mgd potable water storage tank. According to the 2020 UWMP, the MOD was 8,988 gpm.

Livingston's City Engineer, Gouveia Engineering, also indicated the active wells for the City have a total capacity to supply 8,600 gpm when all 7 wells are active, and the firm capacity is 6,600 gpm.

The City's current supply from groundwater wells does not meet the City's MOD and is also in a deficit when considering firm capacity. The water system would need to add additional sources to meet California Water Code requirements for system redundancy and develop additional wells to accommodate for any future growth. Although, Gouveia Engineering, did indicate that the city has two new wells planned on the north side (which were included in the desktop hydraulic model as described in section 3.3.5) in order to supply water for future demands and growth.

Additional limiting factors potentially come from the Merced County Subbasin GSP, which defines a sustainable yield of 570,000 AFY to eight (8) entities. of which Livingston is included. However, allocation to each of the eight entities has not been defined yet. Although there is currently no adjudicated sustainable yield for agencies within the Merced County Subbasin, the GSP states the subbasin is being over drafted. Therefore, each groundwater withdrawer within the Basin will likely be required to reduce groundwater withdrawals unless the groundwater is replenished through recharge. The summary of Livingston's water supply capacity is provided in Table 3-3 below.

Merced County Association of Governments
Merced County Infrastructure Capacity Assessment

Page 13 ends
← All documents from this meeting