Agenda — Lodi City Council, June 3, 2026 (part 3 of 4)

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $01
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
678

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP 64386
752918C 08/19/76 01:15 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.LODI TOKAY STREET Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. Type C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
2 15
Code
4 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
18 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 81

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
TRACK 9104

27. FRA Track
Class
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
17 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 10

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 3
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
679

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP 63876
752918C 07/29/76 01:00 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
2 10
Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
35 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
2 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 90

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
TOKAY ST.

27. FRA Track
Class
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
34 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
mph
Code
RUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 10

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 3 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 2
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
680

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP 67005
752918C 12/05/75 04:50 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
1 0
Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
1 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 58

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
3 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of
Cars
154

30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 5
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
2 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 1
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
681

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP 66425
752918C 11/08/75 11:05 PM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
2 3
Code
4 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
18 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

41. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name

MAKE UP TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of
Cars
16 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
3 mph
Code
Units E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 10

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 2
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 5

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
682

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

2.Name of Other Railroad or Other Entity Filling for Equipment Involved in Train Accident/Incident 3a. Alphabetic Code
2a. Alphabetic Code 2b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.
3b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

UP
UP
0820NC026
0820NC026
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 64

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN
TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
27 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
50 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
A01 02 03 06
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
31 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
1 1. Male

2. Female66

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage)0
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 3

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
HIGHWAY USER'S ACTIONS: WENT AROUND GATES - MOVING.
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 8 20200
day yearmonth
21 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI FRESNO SUB 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVENUELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
1 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
1 10:46 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
683

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

ATK
UP
102052
XXX
Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) [ATK]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
2 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
15 mph
Code
RUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 03 06
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
31 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
2 1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 36

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
TRAIN NO.#703 OPERATING WITH LOCOMOTIVE 179 AND 4 CARS STRUCK A PEDESTRIAN TRESPASSING AT MP71.9, LODI AVE CROSSING. °F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 20060
day yearmonth
40 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision STOCKTON 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
1 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
3 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
1 10:42 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
684

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
72400
72400
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9104

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
5 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
3 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 1 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $12,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19801
day yearmonth
21 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 12:55 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
685

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
66430
66430
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9104

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
4 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
3 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
02 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 1
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 19800
day yearmonth
11 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West30 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:35 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
686

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
64940
64940
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
4 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
2 28. Number of
Locomotive
0 29. Number of Cars
1 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
4 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
02 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
2 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 8 19800
day yearmonth
81 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
4 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West4 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
1 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
4 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 8:10 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
687

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
40549
40549
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 43

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
43 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
10 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
4 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
2 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19791
day yearmonth
22 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West0 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 1

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:30 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
688

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
48309
48309
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
89 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
28 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
5 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 1

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,8001
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 1
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 4 19790
day yearmonth
91 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West25 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 12:45 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
689

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
44939
44939
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 36

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
91 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
20 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 11
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 1
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
2 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 3 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2,0002
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 3

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19790
day yearmonth
82 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West15 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
690

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
53978
53978
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
87 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 19780
day yearmonth
32 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 12:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
691

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
48017
48017
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
3 26. Track Number or Name
SIDING

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
2 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
1 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
8 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 5 19770
day yearmonth
61 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West8 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 10:25 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
692

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
46117
46117
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
TRACK 8

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
7 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 3 19770
day yearmonth
91 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West5 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:00 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
693

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
44297
44297
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 30

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of Cars
60 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
20 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 1 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
2 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19770
day yearmonth
51 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West5 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 11:50 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
694

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP 57476Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

21. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
TRACK 9104

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
1 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752917V

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19760
day yearmonth
52 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLODI AVENUELODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West25 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 11:00 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
695

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
1011RS005
1011RS005
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 69

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
64 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
40 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
A01 02 03 05 06 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
11 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
2 1. Male

2. Female42

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
1 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $10,0000
0 0
2 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 2

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
HIGHWAY USER'S ACTIONS: WENT AROUND THE GATE - MOVING.
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 0 20111
day yearmonth
70 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI FRESNO SUB 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West30 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
22 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
4 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both2
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
2 Code
1 2:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
696

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
0198RS055
0198RS055
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

EAST MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
45 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
44 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 06
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $01
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 2

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date

41. WALKED THROUGH GATES- STRUCK BY TRAIN.
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19980
day yearmonth
50 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPUBLICLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
2 Code
1 2:40 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
697

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
K0592
K0592
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
201

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
1 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
11 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 3 19920
day yearmonth
70 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West5 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 9:25 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
698

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
74050
74050
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
129

30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 2 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3,5001
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19801
day yearmonth
02 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West20 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
699

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
59580
59580
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
8 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name

TRACK THREE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of Cars
0 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
8 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $7000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 5 19800
day yearmonth
32 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
6 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
4 11:50 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
700

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
R3299
R3299
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
64 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 05
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
11 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 19790
day yearmonth
91 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 8:20 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
701

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
45589
45589
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 40

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
YARD TRACK 1

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
97 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
0 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
32 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19790
day yearmonth
10 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
3 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West20 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
6 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
4 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 10:00 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
702

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
R0068
R0068
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
83 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
2 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $01
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19781
day yearmonth
31 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
1 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train(geographical) NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 9:25 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
703

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
47388
47388
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
14 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
10 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 06
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 5 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 4 19780
day yearmonth
20 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicE PINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:15 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
704

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
52837
52837
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 76

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name

OLD PASS

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
21 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 19770
day yearmonth
62 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
12 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train(geographical) NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:55 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
705

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
52547
52547
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
NO 8

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
15 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
4 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 2 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 9 19770
day yearmonth
41 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West5 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 7:57 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
706

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
44107
44107
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 40

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
3 27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
5 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
07 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
5 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19770
day yearmonth
60 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West20 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
5 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
4 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
6:20 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
707

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP 63966Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
3 26. Track Number or Name
NO 8

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
2 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
9 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
03 08
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 1 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $4,0000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752914A

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 8 19760
day yearmonth
50 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicPINE STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West50 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:55 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
708

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
1223NC022
1223NC022
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 51

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

31. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN
TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
6 29. Number of Cars
52 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
40 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
2 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
B01 02 03 06 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
31 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
1 1. Male

2. Female35

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 2

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
MRVBLX-17, LEAD UNIT UP8096 THOUGHT THEY SAW A SHOPPING CART FULL OF TRASH AT THE CROSSING, FOULING THE MAIN TRACK. AS THEY GOT CLOSER, THE CART BEGAN TO MOVE AND THEY REALIZED IT WAS A MAN IN A WHEELCHAIR WITH A BLANKET OVER THE TOP OF HIM. THE PLOWOF THE LEAD UNIT STRUCK THE INDIVIDUAL AND THREW THE MAN CLEAR OF THE RAIL. THE MAN WAS TRANSPORTED WITH SERIOUS INJURIES.HIGHWAY USER'S ACTIONS:WENT AROUND THE GATE - MOVING. °F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 20231
day yearmonth
71 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI FRESNO SUB 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

OMB Approval expires 7/31/2023
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both2
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
1 5:56 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
709

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
0602RS027
0602RS027
0602RS027
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 89

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

NORTH MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
16 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
15 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 06
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
1 1. Male

2. Female35

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 3

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 6 20020
day yearmonth
82 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both2
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
1 9:30 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
710

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
0700RS008
0700RS008
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 90

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
79 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
43 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 02 03 06 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
11 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $01
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 2

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 7 20000
day yearmonth
90 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
4:30 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
711

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
E0525
E0525
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
5 29. Number of Cars
102

30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
25 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
4 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19850
day yearmonth
72 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West0 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 1

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:40 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
712

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
46239
46239
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 47

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
59 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
10 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
22 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
5 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $7500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 3 19790
day yearmonth
11 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West20 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
24 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
3 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 12:50 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
713

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
56408
56408
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 40

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
5 29. Number of Cars
109

30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19781
day yearmonth
20 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West25 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
17 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
3 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 5:30 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
714

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
44758
44758
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 60

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

31. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name
MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
49 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
30 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 3

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 19780
day yearmonth
41 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West30 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 1:55 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
715

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
53967
53967
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 55

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
NO 8 PASS

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
23 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
2 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 0 19771
day yearmonth
91 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West0 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
23 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
3 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 1

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:15 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
716

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
51747
51747
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name

OLD PASS

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
10 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
3 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
05 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
2 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $4400
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 8 19770
day yearmonth
61 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
CE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West3 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 10:55 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
717

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
50537
50537
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 65

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
8 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
3 26. Track Number or Name

OLD PASS

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of Cars
0 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
3 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3500
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 7 19770
day yearmonth
62 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:25 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
718

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
48147
48147
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 42

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
PASS

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
16 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
6 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $1,5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 5 19770
day yearmonth
12 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West35 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:45 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
719

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
44967
44967
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
0 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 2

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $2,5000
0 0
2 1
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19770
day yearmonth
11 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West20 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 12:08 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
720

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP 61645Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 68

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9108

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
11 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752913T

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 7 19750
day yearmonth
50 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicELM STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West0 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
13 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
4 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 2

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:15 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
721

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
UP
UP
0808RS033
0808RS033
752912L 08/24/08 09:45 PM
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINROSEVILLE SULODI

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.LODI LOCUST STREET Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. Type C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) K

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
1 Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

41. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 78

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of
Cars
23 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
34 mph
Code
RUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
201 02 03 06 07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 1 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage)1
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
3 1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
722

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
UP
UP
0508RS011
0508RS011
752912L 05/10/08 10:00 PM
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINROSEVILLE SULODI

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
1 0
Code
3 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
2 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

41. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
4 29. Number of
Cars
67 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
45 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
201 02 03 06 07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 3 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 5
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)
2 1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
2 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
DRIVER'S ACTIONS: STOPPED ON CROSSING (BEFORE GATES DESCENDED).

A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
723

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
52818
52818
752912L 08/29/78 11:15 AM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
2 Code

15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 98

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9150

27. FRA Track
Class
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
12 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $00
0 0
1 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
724

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT
OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident
3a.
2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.
2b.
3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident
SP
SP
52808
52808
752912L 08/29/78 06:45 AM
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]

7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code CA06SAN JOAQUINLODI

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.LODI LOCUST ST Public Private Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved
Code Code13. Type C. Truck-trailer
D. Pick-up truck
E. Van
A. Auto
B. Truck
F. Bus
G. School Bus
H. Motorcycle
J. Other Motor Vehicle
K. Pedestrian
M. Other (specify) A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact)

1. Train

2. Train
(units pulling)
(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)

5. Car(s)
(standing)
(moving)
(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other
(moving)
(standing)7. Light loco(s)
(specify)
6 2
Code
4 15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train
1 16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped
Code
3 19. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user
Code
1 20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
Code
4 Code

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by
20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 68

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist
Code
7 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9150

27. FRA Track
Class
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of
Cars
0 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded if available)
2 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
2 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code
04 1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code
with Highway Signals
Code
Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38. Driver's
Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify) 2
Code41. Driver
Gender
Warning
20 sec warn min (1);

42. Driver Passed Standing
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a.

Name Of
1b.

Alphabetic Code
Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured
Code
3 47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $4000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users
(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
A. Train pulling- RCL
B. Train pushing- RCL
C. Train standing- RCL
°F
725

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

UP
UP
1114RS006
1114RS006
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
Union Pacific Railroad Company [UP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 70

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

SINGLE MAIN

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
3 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
72 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
20 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
1 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
A01 02 03 06 07
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code
1 1. Male

2. Female35

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage)0
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew) 3

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle? Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 0

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
HIGHWAY USER'S ACTIONS: WENT AROUND THE GATE - MOVING.
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 1 20141
day yearmonth
60 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI FRESNO SUB 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLOCKEFORD STREETLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
KE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

41. Highway User
1 Code
1 2:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
726

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
E1525
E1525
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 48

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

21. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
9150

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
5 29. Number of Cars
102

30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
01 05 07 10
A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
11 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
1 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $8000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 3 19850
day yearmonth
40 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLOCKFORD STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West5 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 8:40 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
727

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
53570
53570
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 50

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
4 23. Weather (single entry) Code

21. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
4 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
29 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 2 19800
day yearmonth
32 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLOCKEFORD STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
BE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West10 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 12:05 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
728

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP
SP
51209
51209
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 75

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN TRACK

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
3 29. Number of Cars
36 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
4 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
2 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $3000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 2

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 5 19790
day yearmonth
12 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicE LOCKFORD STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
2 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West25 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
2 Code
1 1:25 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
729

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP 61096Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 80

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
2 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
1 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
1 26. Track Number or Name

MAIN LINE

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
5 28. Number of
Locomotive
2 29. Number of Cars
59 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
25 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 1 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
5 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 1

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $8001
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 5 19760
day yearmonth
41 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLOCKFORD STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
1 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West0 1. North

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 2

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 5:00 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
730

42. Driver Passed Standing

1.Name of Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING
ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORT OMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FORM FRA F 6180.57 (Rev. 08/10) * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

3. Name of Railroad or Other Entity Responsible for Track Maintenance

SP 65465Southern Pacific Transportation Company [SP]
20c. State here the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature
(specify if minus) 52

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark
Code
1 23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment
(single entry)

1. Freight Train

2. Passenger Train-Pulling

3. Commuter Train-Pulling

4. Work Train

5. Single Car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Maint./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)
A. Spec. MoW Equip.Consist
Code
8 25. Track Type Used by Rail
Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry
Code
2 26. Track Number or Name
TRACK 9150

27. FRA Track
Class (1-9,X)
1 28. Number of
Locomotive
1 29. Number of Cars
0 30. Consist Speed
R. Recorded
(Recorded speed if available)
5 mph
Code
EUnits E. Estimated

1. North

2. South

3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West
Code
3 32. Type of
Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signs
Crossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None
(specify)
Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing Warning 34. Roadway Conditions
Code
04 A. Dry
B. Wet
F.Water (Standing, Moving )

35. Location of Warning
21 1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street 2 Code with Highway Signals Code Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
Code

38.Hignway
User's

39.Highway User's Gender
Code1. Male

2. Female

40. Highway User Went Behind or in Front of Train
and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown 2
Code

1. Went around the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)
3 Code

41. Highway User
(See reverse side for
Highway Vehicle

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown
2 Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction) 8 Code

1. Permanent Structure

2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train

4. Topography

5. Vegetation

6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)
1a. Alphabetic Code 1b. Railroad Accident/Incident No.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train
Killed Injured

44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured 3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage
(est. dollar damage) $5000
0 0
0 0
0 50. Total Number of People on Train
(include passengers and train crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?
1 Code

48. Total Number of Vehicle Occupants
(including driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /
Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2
Code
53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date
°F

4. U.S. DOT Grade Crossing ID No.
752911E

5. Date of Accident/Incident 6. Time of Accident/Incident 0 19751
day yearmonth
31 Code
CA

7. Nearest Railroad Station 9. County 10. State8. Subdivision LODI 06SAN JOAQUIN Abbr.
(single entry)
(if in a city) PublicLOCKFORD STLODI Private11. City 12. Highway Name or No.

Rail Equipment InvolvedHighway User Involved
AE. Van M. Other
F. Bus
K. Pedestrian

13. Type
(specify)
J. Other Motor Vehicle
Code
H. Motorcycle
D. Pick-up truck
B. Truck
A. Auto
C. Truck-trailer
G. School Bus D. EMU Locomotive(s)2. Train
A. Train pulling- RCL
6 (moving)
(standing)

4. Car(s)
(standing)
C. Train standing- RCL

17. Equipment
(standing)
(units pushing) Code

5. Car(s)

7. Light loco(s)

1. Train (units pulling)

3. Train

6. Light loco(s) (moving)
B. Train pushing- RCL
E. DMU Locomotive(s)(specify)8. Other

3. East 4. West25 1. North

14. Vehicle Speed
(est. mph at impact) 2. South
Code
1 15. Direction 18. Position of Car Unit in Train
2 (geographical)
NOTE: This report is part of the reporting railroad's accident report pursuant to the accident reports statute and, as such shall not “be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any suit or action for damages growing out of any matter mentioned in said report...." 49 U.S.C. 20903. See 49 C.F.R. 225.7 (b).

OMB Approval expires 6/30/2021
(Be specific, and continue on separate sheet if necessary)

1. Rail equipment struck highway user

1. Stalled or stuck on crossing Code19. Circumstance

2. Rail equipment struck by highway userCode

16. Position

3. Moving over crossing 3

4. Trapped on crossing by traffic

2. Stopped on Crossing
Yes No
Yes No
Video Taken?
Video Used?
Age

6. Went around/thru temporary barricade
(if yes, see instructions)

8. Suicide/Attempted suicide

7. Went thru the gate
C.Snow/Slush
D.Ice
E. Sand,Mud,Dirt,Oil,Gravel
instructions and codes)
C. Commuter Train-Pushing
B. Passenger Train-Pushing

5. Blocked on crossing by gates

3. Both 3. Both4
20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

2. Rail Equipment4. Neither 1. Highway User
20a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

4. Neither2. Rail Equipment
Code Code

1. Highway User
1 Code
1 6:40 AM PM
D. EMU
E. DMU
731

Select Quiet Zone
Crossings
• Public
• Private
• Pedestrian Only
Identify Safety
Enhacements
• SSMs - defined QZ improvements
• Alternative QZ Safety Measures
• other requirements or recommendations
Project
Development and
Stakeholder
Concurrence
• City
• Railroad
• CPUC
• FRA
Submit Notice of
Intent (NOI)
• NOI includes project details, establishment method and • Stakeholder Rview/Comment Reriod
*FRA Application
• Only required if Alternative Safety Measures (ASMs) are proposed
• Review/Comment perdiod
Notice of
Establishment
(NOE)
• submitted after construction
• minimum of 21 days before establishment
732

DECISION PROCESS FOR GRADE CROSSING IMPR OVEMENTS
Meet with City Team to Discuss
Project Details and Approach
Establish Diagnostic
Team Consensus
Prepare Revised Conceptual
Exhibits
Build Consensus
Remove Proposed Treatment
from Further Consideration
Schedule Diagnostic Meeting (incl.

UPRR, CPUC, City, FRA, and other
relevant stakeholders)
Present to Railroad(s) and
Stakeholders
Present Concept
Documents to City
Present Concept
Documents to City
Project Design Approval
from Railroads and City
Construction
Conduct Field Visits &
Site Investigation
Advance Design
 Work task
 Decision point
 Gain consensus
 Meeting to present or build consensus
*Data Collection may include: Preparation of aerial & street view exhibits; FRA accident history at crossing; FRA crossing inventory; UPRR incident and unsafe motorist reports; local police accident data; local agency safety concerns; as-built data; utilities; other related project data
Does City Agree
With Proposed
Treatments?
Do Stakeholders
Agree With
Proposed
Treatments?
No
Ye s
Does City Agree
With
Proposed
Treatments?
Remove Proposed Treatment
from Further Consideration
Analyze Historical &
Field Data
Perform Data Collection*
Develop Findings, Recommendations,
and Conceptual Documents
No No
Ye s Ye s
Prepare Revised Conceptual
Documents
Develop City Goals &
Objectives
CPUC GO88B and FRA Quiet Zone
Documentation
(UPRR/City/CPUC/FRA to
Approve)
733
APPENDIX B: OUTREACH SUMMARIES
Appendix B.1: Key Community Outreach Results
Contents
• Steering Committee 1 Slido Poll Results
• Workshop 1 and Steering Committee 2 Summary
• Lodi Downtown Specific Plan Online Questionnaire Results

INTRODUCTION
The project included several outreach events and the input assisted with developing initial concepts and ideas for the Specific Plan. The summaries within this appendix include key results, such as Slido poll feedback and the results from interactive exercises and questionnaires. 734
Lodi Downtown SpeciﬁcPlan
07 - 10 Oct 2024
Poll results
735
Table of contents
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi? (select all that apply) Mention three words that come to mind when you think about Downtown Lodi today? (type in three words)
What can improve the Downtown Lodi experience? (select all that apply) Which of the following improvements are needed in Downtown Lodi? (select your preferred two improvements)
Which design elements are most important to enhance the appearance and functional quality of Downtown Lodi? (select your preferred two improvements) Which of the following mobility improvements would you like to see in Downtown Lodi? (check all that apply)
How do you feel about walkability in Downtown Lodi? (check all that apply) If you parked once and walked around, how far are you willing to walk to your destination? (select your preferred distance)
In three words, describe your vision for Downtown Lodi? (type in three words) 736
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 2
I work here
83 %
I live in the area
33 %
I shop/eat in Downtown
83 %
I utilize a service in Downtown
50 %
I own or operate a commercial property or business in the area 33 %
737
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 2
I visit parks/recreation facilities
25 %
I visit WOW/education facilities
33 %
Other
25 %
738
Wordcloud poll
Mention three words that come to mind when
you think about Downtown Lodi today? (type in
three words)
0 1 3
Potential
Historic
Charming
Walkable
Farmers Market
Beautiful
Welcoming
Vibrant
Unique
Underutilized
TreesSafe
Quiet
Quaint potential historic
Old town
Not inclusive
Meeting Place
Light parade, farmers mkt
Light parade
Intimate
Fun
Friendly family historic
Events
Entertainment
Diverse
Disconnected
Cute
Cozy
Charming, challenged,
Center
739
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
What can improve the Downtown Lodi
experience? (select all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 3
Additional opportunities for shopping and personal services 85 %
New market-rate or mixed-use housing
69 %
Aﬀordable housing
23 %
Access to additional cultural, arts, and entertainment activities 77 %
Gathering spaces – plazas or enhanced parks
69 %
740
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
What can improve the Downtown Lodi
experience? (select all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 3
Connectivity and walkability
77 %
741
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in Downtown Lodi? (select your
preferred two improvements)
(1/2)
0 1 2
Additional street lighting
0 %
Enhanced landscaping and additional street trees
67 %
Additional plazas/seating areas
42 %
Improved directional and Downtown signage
8 %
String bistro lights and/or twinkle lights
17 %
742
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in Downtown Lodi? (select your
preferred two improvements)
(2/2)
0 1 2
Ampliﬁed music for special events
25 %
Increased alley lighting
33 %
Additional public art
8 %
743
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which design elements are most important to
enhance the appearance and functional quality
of Downtown Lodi? (select your preferred two
improvements)
0 1 3
Active pedestrian-oriented frontages such as high storefront windows at the ground ﬂoor, clear entryways from the public right- of-way
46 %
Incorporation of quality building materials and detailed architectural features
62 %
Use of design focal elements such as building details, balconies, recessed entries, and/or additional windows
54 %
Enhanced building wall surfaces facing alleys
23 %
744
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown Lodi? (check
all that apply)
0 1 3
Wider or enhanced sidewalks with pavers or design details 46 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
31 %
Enhancements to alleyways
85 %
Improvements to public transit stops or shelters
31 %
Better connectivity over the railroad tracks
85 %
745
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you feel about walkability in Downtown
Lodi? (check all that apply)
0 1 3
The sidewalks are too narrow
0 %
I tend to avoid alleys
77 %
Alleys provide good connections
8 %
Parking is too far away
15 %
I do not have any concerns about walking Downtown
38 %
746
Multiple-choice poll
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
0 1 3
150 feet (about half a block)
0 %
300 feet (about one block)
15 %
600 feet (about two blocks)
8 %
1,300 feet (about 1/4 mile or 4 blocks / 5-minute walk) 46 %
2,600 feet (about 1/2 mile or 8 blocks/ 10-minute walk) 31 %
747
Wordcloud poll
In three words, describe your vision for
Downtown Lodi? (type in three words)
0 1 3
Vibrant
Lively
Fun Events
Destination
Connected
work
stay
play
music
culinary
Welcoming
Vibrant magnetic clean
Uniﬁed
Twenty four hour
Tourist destination
Safe
Prosperous
Mix of uses
Live
Livable
Inclusiveness
Expanded
Energy
Diverse
Dense
Cohesive
Clean
Character
Bustling
Beautiful
Active
24/7
748
749

MEMO RANDUM

Date: January 17, 202525

To: Cynthia Marsh Organization: City of Lodi
From: Jami Williams Title: Managing Partner,
Planning & Urban Design
Project Name: Lodi Downtown Specific Plan Project Number: 3435-01-PP24 Topic: Community Workshop and Steering Committee Summary

On January 9, 2025, the RRM Design Group conducted the second Steering Committee meeting followed by a Community Workshop in the evening. The meetings were held at the WOW Classroom at 2 North Sacramento Street in Lodi.

The meeting agendas included:
• Team Introductions
• Downtown Lodi Specific Plan Overview
• What is a Specific Plan
• Discovery
• Next Steps
• Interactive Questionnaire

RRM Design Group conducted a presentation and facilitated an interactive questionnaire at each meeting. Attendees had opportunities to ask questions and express their ideas and considerations. The results from the interactive questionnaire were available to review by attendees simultaneously on the screen, which allowed for an engaging way to provide input and learn what others think about the topics discussed.

750

A sign-up sheet was available at the Community Workshop which will facilitate keeping attendees informed during the Specific Plan update process by receiving future communications about the efforts. Business cards including a link to the project website and to the online questionnaire were distributed for attendees to share with others to encourage additional community participation. All materials were available in English and Spanish.

The following pages include the results of the interactive questionnaires conducted at the second Steering Committee meeting and the Community Workshop. 751

Steering Committee Meeting #2
Questionnaire Results

752
Lodi Downtown SpeciﬁcPlan Questionnaire -Steering Committee 2 08 - 10 Jan 2025
Poll results
753
Table of contents
What is the one thing that exists in the area west of the tracks that you would like to see in the expanded Downtown area? (write in one word)
List one problem in the existing Downtown that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to solving (write in one problem)
List one problem in the expanded Downtown area that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to solving (write in one problem)
Which of the following would you like to see in the expanded Downtown area? (select your preferred three improvements)
List one improvement or activity you would like to see in existing Downtown Lodi today (write in one improvement or activity)
List one future improvement or activity you would like to see in the expanded Downtown area (write in one improvement or activity)
List three words to describe your vision for the expanded Downtown when the east side is enhanced with more housing, shopping, services, gathering areas, lighting, and landscaping (write in three words)
754
Wordcloud poll
What is the one thing that exists in the area west of the tracks that you would like to see in the expanded Downtown area? (write in one word) 0 0 9 Trees
Lights
Landscaping
WalkabilityWalk ways
Stuﬀ to doShops
Security
Safety
RestaurantsPlaza
People
Lughting
Housing
Hotel
Furniture
Entertainment
Cross walks
Clean
Charm
Bricked roads
Biking
755
Wordcloud poll
List one problem in the existing Downtown that
you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to
solving (write in one problem)
0 0 9
Homeless
Cleanliness
Uniﬁcation
Increased dollar spend downtown
Housing
Hours of businesses
Homelessness
756
Wordcloud poll
List one problem in the expanded Downtown
area that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will
contribute to solving (write in one problem)
0 0 9
Housing
Uniﬁcation
Livability
Lack of small businesses
Inﬁll development
Develop RR property
Connectivity
Cleanliness
757
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(1/2)
0 1 0
Additional opportunities for shopping and personal services 30 %
New market-rate or mixed-use housing
50 %
Aﬀordable housing
10 %
Access to additional cultural, arts, and entertainment activities 60 %
Gathering spaces – plazas or enhanced parks
70 %
758
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(2/2)
0 1 0
Connectivity and walkability
50 %
759
Wordcloud poll
List one improvement or activity you would like
to see in existing Downtown Lodi today (write in
one improvement or activity)
0 0 9
Hotel
WOW expansion
More retail
More outdoor dining space
Lodging
Hotel/convention center
Alley restoration
760
Wordcloud poll
List one future improvement or activity you
would like to see in the expanded Downtown
area (write in one improvement or activity)
0 0 9
Wine tasting venues
Sidewalks/landscape
Plaza/park/outdoorspace
Parking/plaza
Open space
Housing/Park space
Grocery
Central square
761
Wordcloud poll
List three words to describe your vision for the expanded Downtown when the east side is enhanced with more housing, shopping, services, gathering areas, lighting, and landscaping (write in three words) 0 0 9
Vibrant
Safe
Destination
Walkable
Vibrant safe clean
Vibrant cultural mix
ShadedNew
Increased economic prosperity
Hip
FunkyDowntown community
Culturally-related charm
Clean
Charming
Bikable
Art
24/7
762

Community Workshop
Questionnaire Results

763
Lodi Downtown SpeciﬁcPlan Questionnaire -LiveSurvey
02 - 10 Jan 2025
Poll results
764
Table of contents
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi? (select all that apply) Mention three words that come to mind when you think about Downtown Lodi today? (write in three words)
Which of the following improvements are needed in the existing Downtown area? (select your preferred three improvements)
Which of the following mobility improvements would you like to see throughout Downtown Lodi? (select your preferred two improvements) How do you feel about walkability in Downtown? (check all that apply) If you parked once and walked around, how far are you willing to walk to your destination? (select your preferred distance)
Did you know City Council is looking to expand Downtown to Washington Street and create a lively mixed-use, walkable, Downtown district with additional housing? (select yes or no)
List one problem in the existing Downtown that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to solving (write in one problem)
List one problem in the expanded Downtown area that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to solving (write in one problem)
765
Table of contents
What do you currently enjoy west of the tracks that you would like to see in the expanded Downtown area? (write in three words)
Which of the following would you like to see in the expanded Downtown area? (select your preferred three improvements)
List one improvement or activity you would like to see in existing Downtown Lodi today (write in one improvement or activity)
List one future improvement or activity you would like to see in the expanded Downtown area (write in one improvement or activity)
List three words to describe your vision for the expanded Downtown when the east side is enhanced with more housing, shopping, services, gathering areas, lighting, and landscaping (write in three words)
766
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(1/2)
0 3 0
I work here
40 %
I live in the area
40 %
I shop/eat in Downtown
93 %
I utilize a service in Downtown
47 %
I own or operate a commercial property or business in the area 40 %
767
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(2/2)
0 3 0
I visit parks/recreation facilities
27 %
I visit WOW/education facilities
23 %
Other
7 %
768
Wordcloud poll
Mention three words that come to mind when
you think about Downtown Lodi today? (write in
three words)
0 2 9
Quaint
Walkable
Potential
Underutilized
Historic
Food
Charming
Shopping Safe
Post oﬃce
Pleasant
Homeless
Friendly
Dirty sidewalks
underdeveloped
trees dirty homeless
outdatedcute
Vibrant
Unique
Under utilized
Too many thrift shops
Thrift ahops
Shaded
Sad
Potential passion possibilities
Nice
Livelihood
Livable lovable
Lacking
I'm very proud
History homeless potential
Historic underutilized not current
Esthetic
Dirty
Dense
Close
769
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in the existing Downtown area? (select
your preferred three improvements)
(1/2)
0 3 1
Additional street lighting
16 %
Enhanced landscaping and additional street trees
45 %
Additional plazas/seating areas
55 %
Improved directional and Downtown signage
16 %
String bistro lights and/or twinkle lights
55 %
770
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in the existing Downtown area? (select
your preferred three improvements)
(2/2)
0 3 1
Ampliﬁed music for special events
23 %
Increased alley lighting
45 %
Additional public art
29 %
771
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see throughout Downtown
Lodi? (select your preferred two improvements)
0 3 1
Wider or enhanced sidewalks with pavers or design details 26 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
39 %
Enhancements to alleyways
68 %
Improvements to public transit stops or shelters
6 %
Better connectivity over the railroad tracks
52 %
772
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you feel about walkability in
Downtown? (check all that apply)
0 3 1
The sidewalks are too narrow
0 %
I tend to avoid alley
81 %
Alleys provide good connections
0 %
Parking is too far away
16 %
I do not have any concerns about walking Downtown
42 %
773
Multiple-choice poll
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
0 3 1
150 feet (about half a block)
0 %
300 feet (about one block)
10 %
600 feet (about two blocks)
29 %
1,300 feet (about 1/4 mile or 4 blocks / 5-minute walk) 39 %
2,600 feet (about 1/2 mile or 8 blocks/ 10-minute walk) 23 %
774
Multiple-choice poll
Did you know City Council is looking to expand
Downtown to Washington Street and create a
lively mixed-use, walkable, Downtown district
with additional housing? (select yes or no)
0 3 2
Yes
44 %
No
56 %
775
Wordcloud poll
List one problem in the existing Downtown that
you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to
solving (write in one problem)
0 2 8
Public restrooms
Hotel
Homeless tree
terrible
pruning
enhancement
destroying beautiful
Yellow SidewalksVacant spaces upstairs
Unstable people o n sidewalks
Unify both half's of our city
Train cuts town in halfRestrooms
Public washrooms
Needs walkable music
Needs more lighting
More unique updated development opportunities
More businesses
Lack of restaurants Lack of boutique shops
Housing SupplyHotels
Homelessness
Homeless camps
Aﬀordable housing
776
Wordcloud poll
List one problem in the expanded Downtown
area that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will
contribute to solving (write in one problem)
0 2 8
Homeless
Safety
eliminate the east west separation
Walkability Train noise
Train cuts town in half
Sidewalks lighting
Sidewalks
Security
Scary
Reduce train speed to 5mph
Rebitalize
Property owners who don't care
Pedestrian safety
No attractive businesses
Mixed use housingLighting
Lack of quality restaurants
Historic buildings in disrepair
Esthetics
City funded improvements
777
Wordcloud poll
What do you currently enjoy west of the tracks
that you would like to see in the expanded
Downtown area? (write in three words)
0 2 9
Restaurants
Wine tasting
ShoppingBicycling
move the farmers market to the east side
Yellow sidewalks
Walkability Unique restaurants
Trees
Tree lined cobbled
The theme
Safety
Safe walkable vibrant
Restuarants
Restaurants, shopping, gathering spots
Quality restaurants
Public art
Outdoor markets
Nothing
Night time venues
Music venues
Murals
More restaurants
More lighting
More food choices
Mixed use
Historic architecture
Expanded farmers market
Entertainment
Dining
Culture
Bike lanes
Beer and Wine
Bars
Artwork
778
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(1/2)
0 3 0
Additional opportunities for shopping and personal services 63 %
New market-rate or mixed-use housing
27 %
Aﬀordable housing
17 %
Access to additional cultural, arts, and entertainment activities 67 %
Gathering spaces – plazas or enhanced parks
60 %
779
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(2/2)
0 3 0
Connectivity and walkability
47 %
780
Wordcloud poll
List one improvement or activity you would like
to see in existing Downtown Lodi today (write in
one improvement or activity)
0 2 9
Hotel
Boutique hotel
Public restrooms
west pedestrian
east access
Theater
Sitting areas
Safe places to relax
Safe
Restaurants with better foods New sidewalks (not yellow) New benches
More unique shopping/ less thrift stores
More community events
Gift shops
Fix the Post Oﬃce landscaping it's a disgrace
Entertainment
Delicatessen
Convention center/hotel
Boutique hotels
Book store
Bike
Arcade
Festivals
781
Wordcloud poll
List one future improvement or activity you
would like to see in the expanded Downtown
area (write in one improvement or activity)
0 2 7
Mixed use housing
Recreation center
Music or entertainment pavilion
Condos above with shops and work spaces
below
sushispas
retreatrestaurants reduce traﬃc speed
places
YMCA
Water features
Shops with work spaces
Recreational center
Mixed use
Market hall
Live performance
Japanesethemed Greenspaces
Festival
Cleaned up
Buddhist
Beautiful landscape
782
Wordcloud poll
List three words to describe your vision for the expanded Downtown when the east side is enhanced with more housing, shopping, services, gathering areas, lighting, and landscaping (write in three words) 0 2 6
Vibrant
Safe
Clean
Welcoming
DestinationWalkable
Livableclean interesting attractive
Vibrant, full of character, destination
Vibrant utilized safe
Vibrant attractive energetic
Tourist destination
Thriving
Same as west side
Multicultural
Modernized
Law enforcement/ safe

LIVE WORK PLAY
Historic Architecture
Family orintatedFamily friendly
Excited
Everyone's downtown Enjoyable excitement fun
Engaging
Desirable
Culture
Culturally rich
Cultural History
Closeknit
Busy
Bright
Bikeable
Beauty
783
784
Lodi Downtown SpeciﬁcPlan Questionnaire -Remote Survey
06 Jan - 28 Feb 2025
Poll results
785
Table of contents
Community Questionnaire
786
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (1/14)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(1/2)
1 4 4
I work here
28 %
I live in the area
65 %
I shop/eat in Downtown
85 %
I utilize a service in Downtown
32 %
I own or operate a commercial property or business in the area 11 %
787
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (1/14)
Why do you typically visit Downtown Lodi?
(select all that apply)
(2/2)
1 4 4
I visit parks/recreation facilities
31 %
I visit WOW/education facilities
22 %
Other
8 %
788
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (2/14)
Mention three words that come to mind when
you think about Downtown Lodi today? (write in
three words)
1 3 6
quaint
Homeless
fun
dirty
cute
Walkable
Historic
potential
clean
Small
unsafe
safe
inviting
Underutilized
Homelessness
Charming
quiet
pleasant
parking
home
food
evolving
dead
community
Vibrant
Untapped potential
Tired
Neglected
Attractive
vanilla
vacancies
upcoming
upandcoming
unique
uneven
underused
underperforming
uncultured
uncrowded
thrifting
strolling
stores
smell
shops
shopping
shady
scenery
sad
789
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (3/14)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in the existing Downtown area? (select
your preferred three improvements)
(1/2)
1 3 9
Additional street lighting
22 %
Enhanced landscaping and additional street trees
36 %
Additional plazas/seating areas
48 %
Improved directional and Downtown signage
9 %
String bistro lights and/or twinkle lights
54 %
790
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (3/14)
Which of the following improvements are
needed in the existing Downtown area? (select
your preferred three improvements)
(2/2)
1 3 9
Ampliﬁed music for special events
23 %
Increased alley lighting
52 %
Additional public art
28 %
791
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (4/14)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see throughout Downtown
Lodi? (select your preferred two improvements)
1 3 0
Wider or enhanced sidewalks with pavers or design details 34 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
28 %
Enhancements to alleyways
66 %
Improvements to public transit stops or shelters
14 %
Better connectivity over the railroad tracks
30 %
792
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (5/14)
How do you feel about walkability in
Downtown? (check all that apply)
1 4 2
The sidewalks are too narrow
8 %
I tend to avoid alley
58 %
Alleys provide good connections
8 %
Parking is too far away
37 %
I do not have any concerns about walking Downtown
33 %
793
Multiple-choice poll
Community Questionnaire (6/14)
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
1 4 3
150 feet (about half a block)
6 %
300 feet (about one block)
15 %
600 feet (about two blocks)
35 %
1,300 feet (about 1/4 mile or 4 blocks / 5-minute walk) 31 %
2,600 feet (about 1/2 mile or 8 blocks/ 10-minute walk) 13 %
794
Multiple-choice poll
Community Questionnaire (7/14)
Did you know City Council is looking to expand
Downtown to Washington Street and create a
lively mixed-use, walkable, Downtown district
with additional housing? (select yes or no)
1 4 3
Yes
34 %
No
66 %
795
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (8/14)
List one problem in the existing Downtown that
you hope the Speciﬁc Plan will contribute to
solving? (write in one problem)
1 3 4
Homeless
Parking
downtown
visitors
Safety
streets problem
people
old
make
homelessness
close
updating
stop
shops
residents
public
pay
park
ﬂoor
family
expand
existing
early
cleanliness
businesses business
bike
attract
areas add
activities
Street
School
Many Limited
Lighting
City
Bringing
yes
worth
work
white weird
weekend
ways
walkways
visual
visiting
vibrant
796
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (9/14)
List one existing problem in the expanded
Downtown area that you hope the Speciﬁc Plan
will contribute to solving? (write in one
problem)
1 2 7
Parking
Homeless
downtown
Safetyarea
safe
businesses
buildings
Crime
main
housing
east
Street variety
unhousedtracks
railroad
places
larger
lack
expanded
business
Old
Issues
youth
years
worship
wide
walking
walkable
visitors
use
upgrading
updated
turn
trashy
train
takes
797
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (10/14)
What do you currently enjoy west of the tracks
that you would like to see in the expanded
Downtown area? (write in three words)
1 1 5
restaurants
safety
shoppingstores
food
events bars
wine
shopsrooms
retail placesnicer
nice new
dining
businesses
buildings
boutiques
Walkability
Unique
Tasting
N/A
Art
walking
venues
variety
ups
trees
time
throwing
things
successful
street lights, shops, restaurants
street
southamerican
smallbusiness
small industrial business with garage space
small
school
safe spaces restaurant
preservation
pop
places to eat
parks
or
options
798
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (11/14)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(1/2)
1 4 2
Additional opportunities for shopping and personal services 65 %
New market-rate or mixed-use housing
20 %
Aﬀordable housing
20 %
Access to additional cultural, arts, and entertainment activities 61 %
Gathering spaces – plazas or enhanced parks
62 %
799
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Community Questionnaire (11/14)
Which of the following would you like to see in
the expanded Downtown area? (select your
preferred three improvements)
(2/2)
1 4 2
Connectivity and walkability
49 %
800
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (12/14)
List one improvement or activity you would like
to see in existing Downtown Lodi today? (write
in one improvement or activity)
1 2 2
parking
street
spaces
events businesses
art
Lodi
FOODClean
with walk
tasting
skate
saferpark
options
lightshousing
abilitySafety
yogawith
wine/beer
wine
weekly
weekend
wedding
walkways
walkable
visitors
vibrant
venue
variety
utilize
use
tourists
theater
the
terrace(s)
tax
taking
801
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (13/14)
List one future improvement or activity you
would like to see in the expanded Downtown
area? (write in one improvement or activity)
1 1 6
areaspace
lighting
downtown
restaurants
people
great
expanded
Safety
Parking
tracks
street
sidewalks
school
place
open
mixed
focus
art
Seating
younger
year works
wipe
wine
wideuse
type
tree
time
succeed
streets
stockton
spaces
skyzone
similar
802
Wordcloud poll
Community Questionnaire (14/14)
List three words to describe your vision for the expanded Downtown when the east side is enhanced with more housing, shopping, services, gathering areas, lighting, and landscaping (write in three words) 1 1 9
safesafety
clean
fun
community
Welcoming
lively
lighting
inviting
housing
gathering
cleanliness
aﬀordable
Family
vibrant
use
thriving
space
pretty
parksoptions
landscaping
inclusivity
food
entertaining
convenient comfortable
bustling
beautiful
barsareas
Energetic
Bright
wine
welllit
walkable native landscape
walkable
visible
vibrancy
viable destination
tourist
tourism/
tent
surrounding
support
signing sightseeing 803

Addendum to the
2025 Focused General Plan Update
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report
for the
Lodi Downtown Specific Plan

LEAD AGENCY:

City of Lodi, California
221 W Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240
Contact: Cynthia Marsh
Deputy Director/City Planner
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 209-269-4412

PREPARED BY:

Morse Planning Group

February 17, 2026

804

This page intentionally left blank

805

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3

1.1 Statutory Authority and Requirements .............................................................................. 4

1.2 Responsible and Trustee Agencies ..................................................................................... 4

1.3 Incorporation by Reference ................................................................................................ 4

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 7

3.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .............................................................................. 13

4.0 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ................................................................. 15

4.1 Aesthetics .......................................................................................................................... 17

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources .................................................................................. 20

4.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 23

4.4 Biological Resources ......................................................................................................... 25

4.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 28

4.6 Energy ............................................................................................................................... 30

4.7 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................. 31

4.8 Greenhouse Gases ............................................................................................................ 35

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .................................................................................... 37

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ........................................................................................... 40

4.11 Land Use and Planning ...................................................................................................... 43

4.12 Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................ 44

4.13 Noise ................................................................................................................................. 46

4.14 Population and Housing .................................................................................................... 48

4.15 Public Services ................................................................................................................... 50

4.16 Recreation ......................................................................................................................... 52

4.17 Transportation .................................................................................................................. 53

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................. 63

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................ 65

4.20 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................. 68

4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .................................................................................. 71

4.22 CEQA Determination ......................................................................................................... 74

5.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION ................................................................................................... 75

806

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 2 February 17, 2026

EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1, Lodi Downtown Map………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…11 Exhibit 2, Downtown Zoning Districts Map………………………………………………………………………………….……..12

TABLES
Table 1, Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service…………………………………………………………………..56 Table 2, Lockeford Road Diet Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service……………………………………………….57 Table 3, Locust Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service……………………………………………..58 Table 4, Sacramento Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service…………………………………….59 Table 5, Combination of Roadway Modifications Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service…….………….60

807

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 3 February 17, 2026

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Lodi Downtown Specific Plan (herein referenced as the “project,” “proposed project ,” or “proposed modification”) involves adoption and implementation of the zoning overlay. Following a preliminary review of the proposed project, the City of Lodi has determined that the proposed project is subject to the guidelines and regulations of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

This document is an Addendum to the City of Lodi Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (General Plan Update EIR, GPU EIR) certified in July 2025.

The GPU EIR and this Addendum serve as the environmental review for the project components: 1) Lodi Downtown Specific Plan, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act ([CEQA] [Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.]) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Sections 15000-15387).

Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines , the City of Lodi (City) is the Lead Agency . This Addendum addresses the potential environmental impacts associated with the adoption of the Lodi Downtown Specific Plan, which will be considered by the City during the project’s review and approval process along with the prior CEQA documentation.

1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS

This environmental document has been prepared in conformance with CEQA (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.); CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementation of CEQA, as adopted by the City of Lodi.

In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15051 and 15367, the City of Lodi (City) is identified as the Lead Agency for the proposed project. Under CEQA (Public Resource Code Sections 21000-21177) and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the City is required to undertake the preparation of an Initial Study to determine if the proposed project would have a significant environmental impact. If, as a result of the Initial Study, the Lead Agency finds that there is evidence that any aspect of the project may cause a significant environmental effect, the Lead Agency shall further find that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is warranted to analyze project -related and cumulative environmental impacts. Alternatively, if the Lead Agency finds no evidence that the project, either as proposed or as modified to include the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study, may cause a significant effect on the environment, the Lead Agency shall find that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment and shall prepare a Negative Declaration. Such determination can be made only if “there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the Lead Agency” that such impacts may occur ( PRC Section 21080(c)).

The environmental documentation, which is ultimately selected by the City in accordance with CEQA, is intended as an informational document undertaken to provide an environmental basis for subsequent discretionary actions relevant to the project. The resulting documentation is not, however, a policy document and its approval and/or certification neither presupposes nor mandates any actions on the part of those agencies from whom permits and other discretionary approvals would be required.

1. If applicable, the environmental documentation and supporting analysis are subject to a public review period. During this review, agency and public comments on the document relative to environmental issues should be addressed to the City. Following review of any comments received, the City will consider these comments a p art of the project’s environmental review and include them with the environmental documentation for consideration by the City.
808

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 4 February 17, 2026

1.2 RESPONSIBLE AND TRUSTEE AGENCIES

Certain projects or actions undertaken by a Lead Agency require subsequent oversight, approvals, or permits from other public agencies in order to be implemented. Such other agencies are referred to as Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15381 and 15386, as amended, Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies are respectively defined as follows:

“Responsible Agency” means a public agency, which proposes to carry out or approve a project, for which [a] Lead Agency is preparing or has prepared an EIR or Negative Declaration. For the purposes of CEQA , the term “responsible agency” includes all public agencies other than the Lead Agency, which have discretionary approval power over the project. (Section 15381)

“Trustee Agency” means a state agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by a project, which are held in trust for the people of the State of California. Trustee Agencies include; The California Department of Fish and Wildlife, The State Lands Commission; The State Department of Parks and Recreation and The University of California with regard to sites within the Natural Land and Water Reserves System. (Section 15386)

As soon as the Lead Agency has determined that an Initial Study would be required for a project, the Lead Agency is directed to consult informally with all Responsible Agencies and Trustee Agencies that are responsible for resources affected by the project, in order to obtain the recommendations of those agencies as to whether an EIR or a Negative Declaration should be prepared for the project. Following receipt of any written comments from those agencies, the Lead Agency considers any recommendations of th ose agencies in the formulation of the preliminary findings. Following completion of this Initial Study, the Lead Agency initiates formal consultation with these Responsible and Trustee Agencies and other governmental agencies , as required under CEQA and its implementing guidelines.

For this project, the City of Lodi is the Lead Agency and has the sole responsibility of processing and approving the project. There are no Responsible or Trustee Agencies that have oversight, approval, or permit responsibility associated with the project, or require consultation with the City of Lodi. In addition, no other agency is required to approve the Lodi Downtown Specific Plan.

1.3 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
Pertinent documents relating to this Initial Study have been cited in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, which encourages incorporation by reference as a means of reducing redundancy and length of environmental reports. The following documents are hereby incorporated by reference into this Addendum .

Information contained within these documents has been utilized for this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Lodi Community Development Department located at 221 W Pine Street, Lodi, California 90503, and online, if available, with the links provided below.

809

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 5 February 17, 2026 THE CITY OF LODI GENERAL PLAN. The City of Lodi General Plan (Lodi General Plan, General Plan) is a long-range planning document that guides decisions related to land use. 2010 General Plan Documents
Final General Plan - April 2010
• Draft Environmental Impact Report
• Chapter 1 – Introduction
• Chapter 2 - Land Use
• Chapter 3 - Growth Management and Infrastructure
• Chapter 4 - Community Design and Livability
• Chapter 5 - Transportation
• Chapter 6 - Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
• Chapter 7 - Conservation
• Chapter 8 – Safety
• Chapter 9 - Noise
• Chapter A, B, and C - Implementation, Special-Status Species, and Cleanup Sites Status (PDF) • Draft General Plan Complete
• Final General Plan - Entire Document
• General Plan Map Figure 2-1 Land Use
General Plan Environmental Impact Report – April 2010
• Draft Environmental Impact Report
• Final Environmental Impact Report
Environmental Impact Reports
• Notice of Preparation / Notice of Scoping Meeting for a Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the City of Lodi General Plan 2024 General Plan Update • Public Review Draft EIR for Lakehouse Mixed Use Development • Notice of Availability Lakehouse Draft EIR
• Notice of Preparation of Lakehouse EIR
• Notice of Availability/Notice of Public Meeting for a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed 2025 City of Lodi targeted General Plan update and 6th Cycle Housing Element Rezones • Public Review Draft EIR for the Proposed 2025 City of Lodi targeted General Plan update and 6th Cycle Housing Element Rezones
o Appendix A: Notice of Preparation Comment Letters
o Appendix B: Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases Calculations o Appendix C: Water Infrastructure and Supply Memorandum o Final Subsequent EIR
o Letter A
o Letter B

810

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 6 February 17, 2026 2023-2031 Certified Housing Element
The Housing Element update builds on previous City plans, goals, objectives and strategies to ensure that the City meets the housing needs of current and future Lodi residents and provides fair housing options for all. https://www.lodi.gov/documentcenter/view/8317

2024 Environmental Justice Element
https://www.lodi.gov/documentcenter/view/8321

2025 Focused General Plan Update
https://www.planlodi.com/general-plan-1

Lodi Municipal Code
Code of Ordinances Supplement 68
Online content updated on September 15, 2025
LODI MUNICIPAL CODE Codified through Ordinance No. 2030, passed March 19, 2025. (Supp. No. 68)

The Lodi Municipal Code (Municipal Code), codified through Ordinance No. 2030, March 19, 2025 consists of codes and ordinances adopted by the City. These include standards intended to regulate land use, development, health and sanitation, water quality, public facilities, and public safety.

Code of Ordinances | Lodi, CA | Municode Library

811

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 7 February 17, 2026

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

PROJECT LOCATION

Lodi is an incorporated city in the San Joaquin Valley. The City is located between Stockton to the south; Sacramento to the north, and unincorporated San Joaquin Valley lands in the east and west. The City is bisected by State Route (SR) 99 and the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad. Regional access to the City is also provided by SR-12 and Interstate 5.

Lodi is a compact, thoughtfully planned city located in the heart of California’s Central Valley, with a population of approximately 68,752 within a larger regional population of 762,148. Situated about 35 miles from downtown Sacramento and 80 miles east of San Francisco, Lodi offers both small-town charm and strong regional connectivity.

Surrounded by fertile agricultural lands, Lodi is a growing center of wine production and tourism, home to over 85 wineries producing more than 135 varietals. The existing downtown and attractive residential neighborhoods provide a welcoming, small- town atmosphere, complemented by distinctive restaurants, breweries, shops, and recreational amenities like Lodi Lake.

The Sphere of Influence (SOI) is a boundary that identifies land that the City may potentially annex in the future, and for which urban services, if available, could be provided upon annexation. The SOI is established by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) with input from the City. The purpose of the SOI is to identify areas where urban development could be accommodated in the future in an orderly and efficient manner. The Lodi City limits encompass approximately 8,957 acres and the SOI is approximately 11,506 acres.

Lodi’s economy is diverse, including wine grape cultivation, agriculture, manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics.

Business-friendly policies, competitive utility rates through city -owned electric, water, and wastewater services, and a skilled local workforce supported by nearby universities contribute to a favorable environment for commercial and industrial growth. With a compact footprint, exceptional regional access, and a blend of historic charm and modern amenities, Lodi serves as both a preferred res idential choice in San Joaquin County and a growing hub for employers and entrepreneurs.

EXISTING LAND USE

Lodi’s downtown area contains a blend of commercial, office, public, and higher-density residential uses. Ground- floor retail and dining are required in key areas to support a lively, walkable environment. Buildings up to six stories, with a maximum FAR of 3.0, are allowed and projects are not required to provide on -site parking. The Specific Plan encourages redevelopment of underused properties, supports housing and hotel uses to boost downtown activity, and limits outward growth onto farmland while aiming to enhance downtown’s vibrancy while maintaining its character. Improved streetscapes, site rehabilitation, and wayfinding will better link Main Street, Stockton Street, and Pine Street to Hale Park, will reinforce downtown as Lodi’s active civic and economic hub and expand its reach across the railroad tracks to strengthen connections while preserving the eastside neighborhood’s distinct character.

The Specific Plan area primarily has an existing General Plan and zoning designations of Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) with several areas with the land use designation of PQP (Public Quasi Public) accommodating public uses (city hall, police and fire departments, and library). In addition, there are the land use designations of MCO (Mixed Use Corridor) and High Density Residential (RHD) along Washington Street , and three areas designated as Open Space (Hale Park, Softball Complex, and Armory Park).
812

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 8 February 17, 2026

LAND USE REGULATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

While the Specific Plan area zoning will remain, areas of adjustment with the adoption of the Specific Plan include refined allowable land uses in two central areas of the Specific Plan to shape a thriving downtown environment that focuses on the pedestrian experience by providing outdoor dining, retail shops, and community serving uses on the street level. To accommodate this approach, two DMU subareas are established including Subarea A (School Street Core) and Subarea B (Main Street Core).

DMU SUBAREA A (SCHOOL STREET CORE)

The School Street Core is focused on School Street and is envisioned to maintain its existing successful shopping and restaurant focused atmosphere and be enhanced with additional pedestrian elements and activities for all ages. This area has the potential for smaller infill projects and the incorporation of complementary uses to provide additional activity and vitality because the area is largely built out and functioning well. While mixed -use development with residential uses is allowed, standalone reside ntial is not permitted. Storefronts are required along School Street. Hotel uses are desired and are allowed uses no longer requiring use permits.

DMU SUBAREA B (MAIN STREET CORE)

The Main Street Core is envisioned to complement and serve as an extension of the existing downtown with opportunities for infill development providing much needed housing and a revitalized Main Street corridor. Hale Promenade will serve as an activated pe destrian link to Hale Park which will be enhanced to serve as a
neighborhood asset and focal point for future housing. Underutilized railroad-adjacent properties, currently under UPRR ownership, are ripe for beautification, temporary uses or, with a transition of ownership, future development. The traditional character of Main Street will influence new and updated developments.

While much of the Specific Plan will be guided by existing zoning, updated Lodi Development Code Chapter 17.22 Mixed Use Zoning Districts establishes allowable land uses, building form, and site development standards, such as height, setbacks, and objective design standards to regulate existing and future development.

LODI DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN

The Lodi Downtown Specific Plan will set the tone for the community for years to come, not only in terms of creating a sense of place where residents and visitors can live, work and play; but also generate a vital downtown that contributes to the long -term wellbeing of the community. It promotes investment and jobs and identifies housing for all ages and income levels. These improvements will be balanced with the community’s desire to preserve Lodi’s quaint and historic character and capitalize on the success of this food and wine destination. Over time, and through private and public investment, the existing downtown will transform into a cohesive area that bridges both sides of the railroad tracks and result in a thriving, sustainable, and inclusive area t hat continues to serve as the heart of the community.

813

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 9 February 17, 2026

SPECIFIC PLAN AREA

The Specific Plan area is situated west of the Golden State Highway (SR -99) and is generally located from Lodi Avenue on the south to Lockeford Street and the Softball Complex to the north, and from Pleasant Avenue to the west and Washington Street to the east. The area is bisected by the railroad tracks located between Sacramento Street and Main Street. Within the Specific Plan area, Lodi Avenue and Lockeford Street run east-west and provide connections to and from SR -99, and Elm Street and Pine Street lin k the residential neighborhoods which are located west and east of the downtown. Church Street and Stockton Street are oriented north-south and provide connections to the residential, industrial, and commercial corridors on Kettleman Lane (SR -12). The downtown blocks are conventionally developed on a grid system and contain existing alleyways situated for parking and delivery access behind businesses.

SPECIFIC PLAN OVERVIEW

The Specific Plan provides detailed criteria and recommendations to implement the City’s long -term General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies and it is a guide for future development proposals and public improvements within the Specific Plan area. It provides a customized regulatory framework for development and was prepared pursuant to Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code. The document is organized into ten chapters described below.

• CHAPTER 1 – FRAMEWORK – Introduction
This chapter sets the foundation for the Lodi Downtown Specific Plan by outlining its purpose, location, and an overview of the regulatory framework and relationship to other city policy documents.

• CHAPTER 2 – SETTING – Background and Context
This chapter describes the downtown’s existing context including assets and future opportunities.

• CHAPTER 3 - COMMUNITY – Engagement Process
This chapter highlights the depth of community engagement facilitated throughout the development of the Specific Plan and describes the key outcomes.

• CHAPTER 4 – VISION – Vision and Concepts
This chapter captures the shared vision that residents and stakeholders helped to shape and illustrates the future for Downtown Lodi.

• CHAPTER 5 - BUILT ENVIRONMENT - Land Use and Form
This chapter provides direction for development within the Specific Plan area to form the land uses, design character and the built environment. While much of the Specific Plan will be guided by existing zoning, a companion update to the Lodi Development C ode Chapter 17.22 Mixed Use Zoning Districts establishes allowable land uses, building form, and site development standards, such as height, setbacks, and objective design standards to regulate existing and future development. In addition, a Development Intensity Transfer Program provides flexibility for potential development intensity transfers between parcels located in the Specific Plan area without exceeding overall capacity limits.

• CHAPTER 6 - URBAN FABRIC - Placemaking and Beautification This chapter provides recommendations and strategies to improve the resident and visitor experience through enhanced streetscapes, alleys, paseos, and public parks and plazas, as well as the incorporation of cohesive design elements, distinctive signage, a nd public art. Strategies are described for outdoor dining and parklets; public plazas, paseos, and parks; and alleyway enhancements. In addition, the centrally located Union Pacific Railroad right of way provides opportunities for enhancement, 814

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 10 February 17, 2026 connectivity, and placemaking. The Specific Plan describes three potential scenarios depending on future UPRR interest and City resources.

• CHAPTER 7 – CIRCULATION SYSTEM - Mobility
This chapter addresses connectivity and all forms of mobility including pedestrian, transit, bike, and vehicular circulation, as well as parking. Bridging connections between eastern and western areas of the Specific Plan include a variety of strategies in cluding improving safety, accessibility, and community connectivity at railroad crossings to protect drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists while maintaining local access and mobility.

• CHAPTER 8 – SUPPORT SYSTEMS - Infrastructure and Public Facilities This chapter describes existing infrastructure systems and public facilities in the Specific Plan area and identifies needed infrastructure improvements related to water supply, sewer and wastewater, storm drainage, and public facilities and services including police and fire protection, schools, and parks.

• CHAPTER 9 - ROAD MAP – Implementation
This chapter provides potential implementation strategies and priority projects to achieve the short- and long-term goals of the Specific Plan.

• CHAPTER 10 - LOGISTICS – Administration
This chapter addresses the authority of the Specific Plan, non-conforming uses and structures, processing requirements, and the administrative procedures required for amendments to the Specific Plan.

COMPANION DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT

While much of the Specific Plan area zoning will remain, areas of adjustment with the adoption of the Specific Plan include refined allowable land uses in two central areas of the Specific Plan to shape a thriving downtown environment that focuses on the pedestrian experience by providing outdoor dining, retail shops, and community serving uses on the street level.

To accommodate this approach, two Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) subareas will be established including Subarea A (School Street Core) and Subarea B (Main Street Core).

In addition, proposed changes to Development Code Section 17.22.030 that shows some minor changes to the allowed land uses in the Specific Plan area, as well updates to objective development standards. 815

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 11 February 17, 2026 Exhibit 1, Lodi Downtown Map

Source: Lodi 2025 General Plan Update SEIR, Placeworks, ESRI & City of Lodi, 2024

816

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 12 February 17, 2026 Exhibit 2, Downtown Zoning Districts Map

Source: RRM Design Group, 2025
817

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 13 February 17, 2026

3.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

In accordance with CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000-21178.1, this Modified Initial Study has been prepared to analyze whether any new or more significant environmental impacts could occur from implementation of the proposed project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated wit h the proposed project.

1) A finding of “No New Impact/No Impact” means that the potential impact was fully analyzed and/or mitigated in the prior CEQA document and no new or different impacts will result from the proposed activity. A brief explanation is required for all answers e xcept “No New Impact/No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No New Impact/No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No New Impact/No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) A finding of “New Mitigation is Required” means that the project may have a new potentially significant impact on the environment or a substantially more severe impact than analyzed in the previously approved or certified CEQA document and that new mitigation is required to address the impact. 3) A finding of “New Potentially Significant Impact” means that the project may have a new potentially significant impact on the environment or a substantially more severe impact than analyzed in the previously approved or certified CEQA document that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance or be avoided.
4) A finding of “Reduced Impact” means that a previously infeasible mitigation measure is now available, or a previously infeasible alternative is now available that will reduce a significant impact identified in the previously prepared environmental document.
5) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off- site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
6) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measu res based on the earlier analysis. Describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the proposed action. c) Infeasible Mitigation Measures. Since the previous EIR was certified or previous ND or MND was adopted, discuss any mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible that would in fact be feasible or that are considerably different from those previously analyzed and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. 818

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 14 February 17, 2026 d) Changes in Circumstances. Since the previous EIR was certified or previous ND or MND was adopted, discuss any changes in the project, changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause a change in conclusion regarding one or more effects discussed in the original document. 7) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a ref erence to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
8) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
9) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
10) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; b) differences between the proposed activity and the previously approved project described in the approved ND or MND or certified EIR; and
c) the previously approved mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

819

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 15 February 17, 2026

4.0 SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRO NMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

FOR USE WHEN THE CITY IS REVIEWING SUBSEQUENT DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS PURSUANT TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED OR CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT.

1. Project Title: Addendum to the 2025 Focused General Plan Update Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Lodi Downtown Specific Plan

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Lodi
221 W Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Cynthia Marsh, Deputy Director/City Planner
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 209-269-4412

4. Project Location:

City of Lodi

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

City of Lodi
221 W Pine Street
Lodi, CA 95240

6. General Plan Designation:
2025 Focused General Plan Update Subsequent Environmental Impact Report

7. Zoning: Specific Plan

8. Previous Environmental Document: Please describe the previously adopted ND or MND or the previously certified EIR (include the date the document was adopted or certified, the date the project was approved by the City, the date the NOD was filed with the County, and a summary of potentially significant effects identified in the CEQA document).

1. 2024 Adopted Conservation Element Update

2. 2024 Adopted EJ Element

3. 2024 Adopted Safety Element Update

4. Chapter 1 - Introduction (PDF)

5. Chapter 2 - Land Use (PDF)

6. Chapter 3 – Growth Management and Infrastructure (PDF link unavailable)

7. Chapter 4 – Community Design and Livability (PDF)

8. Chapter 5 - Transportation (PDF)

9. Chapter 6 - Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PDF)

10. Chapter 7 - Conservation (PDF)
820

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 16 February 17, 2026

11. Chapter 8 - Safety (PDF)

12. Chapter 9 - Noise (PDF)

13. Chapter A, B, and C - Implementation, Special-Status Species, and Cleanup Sites Status (PDF)

14. Draft General Plan Complete (PDF)

15. Final General Plan - Entire Document (PDF)

16. General Plan Map Figure 2-1 Land Use (PDF)

17. https://www.lodi.gov/DocumentCenter/View/8820/General-Plan-Amendment-Final- Environmental-Impact-Report---June-2025-PDF

Applicant: City of Lodi; File Number: 2024 -04 Z -GPA-EIR; CEQA Determination: A Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") has been prepared pursuant to Sections 15162, 15166, and 15175 through 15178 of the CEQA Guidelines (SCH #2023010102)

Certification of the Final Subsequent General Plan Environmental Impact Report and Adopt California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Findings and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, to Consider a Resolution Amending the General Plan Text and L and Use Map, and Consider Introducing an Ordinance Amending Associated Zoning Map Designations City-wide.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - Planning Commission Resolution 25-07, 2. Attachment 2 - GPLU Map Amendments and Rezones, 3. Attachment 3 - General Plan SOC and MMRP Combined Doc, 4. Attachment 4 - Revised General Plan Figures, 5. Attachment 5 - Draft Ordinance, 6. Attachment 6 - Resolution, 7. Attachment 7 - Exhibit A to Draft Resolution

9. Description of the Project:

Refer to Section 2.5, Project Components.

10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

Refer to Section 2.2.2, Surrounding Land Uses.

11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval or participation agreement).

Refer to Section 2.5, Permits and Approvals.

12. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?

The Addendum to the 2025 Focused General Plan Update Subsequent Environmental Impact Report implements the proposed Lodi Downtown Specific Plan and as such does not involve ground disturbing activities, thus tribal consultation was not conducted.

821

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 17 February 17, 2026

4.1 AESTHETICS

Would the project, except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?  B. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?  C. In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). In an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?

D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 
Note: Certain projects within a transit priority area need not evaluate aesthetics (Public Resources Code Section 21099).

IMPACT ANALYSIS

The proposed Specific Plan provides detailed criteria and recommendations to implement the City’s long -term General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies and it is a guide for future development proposals and public improvements within the Specific Plan area. It provides a customized regulatory framework for development and was prepared pursuant to Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code.

A. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON A SCENIC VISTA?

The City of Lodi is a largely built out community with a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial uses.

The proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment establishes land uses and development standards, but does not include any site-specific development designs or proposals.

Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The Standard Mitigation Measures, Conditions and Requirements address the following as applicable: Aesthetics, Agriculture & Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Mineral Resources, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities/Service Systems/Wildfire, and Mandatory Findings of Significance.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no impacts.

Conclusion: No New Impact. The changes associated with the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of impacts in this regard. 822

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 18 February 17, 2026 B. WOULD THE PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGE SCENIC RESOURCES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT

LIMITED TO, TREES, ROCK OUTCROPPINGS, AND HISTORIC BUILDINGS WITHIN A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY?

According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, there are no state -designated scenic highways in Lodi (Caltrans 2019). The closest designated scenic highway is State Route 160 (SR 160) in Sacramento County, approximately 11 miles northwest of the City. Therefore, future development pursuant to the proposed project would not degrade scenic resources within SR 160, given the intervening distance, varying topography, and development.

As such, the proposed project would have no effects on scenic vistas, trees, rock outcropping, or state scenic highways occur within the City of Lodi.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. IN NONURBANIZED AREAS, WOULD THE PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY DEGRADE THE EXISTING VISUAL CHARACTER OR QUALITY OF PUBLIC VIEWS OF THE SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS? (PUBLIC VIEWS ARE THOSE THAT ARE EXPERIENCED FROM PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE VANTAGE POINT). IN AN URBANIZED AREA, WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH APPLICABLE ZONING AND OTHER REGULATIONS GOVERNING SCENIC QUALITY?

The proposed project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site, nor conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

823

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 19 February 17, 2026 D. WOULD THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW SOURCE OF SUBSTANTIAL LIGHT OR GLARE WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY AFFECT DAY OR NIGHTTIME VIEWS IN THE AREA?

The proposed project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare that could adversely affect day or nighttime views in the areas.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

824

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 20 February 17, 2026

4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES

In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?

B. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 
C. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code S ection 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code S ection 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code S ection 51104(g))?

D. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? 
E. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT CONVERT PRIME FARMLAND, UNIQUE FARMLAND, OR FARMLAND

OF STATEWIDE IMPORTANCE (FARMLAND), AS SHOWN ON THE MAPS PREPARED

PURSUANT TO THE FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM OF THE CALIFORNIA RESOURCES AGENCY, TO NON-AGRICULTURAL USE?

The proposed project would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of statewide importance (farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency.

The proposed project is not located in areas within Lodi designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland). Thus, adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no impacts.

825

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 21 February 17, 2026 Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures, Conditions, and Requirements.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ZONING FOR AGRICULTURAL USE, OR A WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT?

The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract.

Thus, adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no impacts.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ZONING FOR, OR CAUSE REZONING OF, FOREST LAND (AS DEFINED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 12220(G)), TIMBERLAND (AS DEFINED BY PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 4526), OR TIMBERLAND ZONED TIMBERLAND PRODUCTION (AS DEFINED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 51104(G))?

The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned production. Thus, adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no impacts.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN THE LOSS OF FOREST LAND OR CONVERSION OF FOREST LAND TO NON-FOREST USE?

The proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

Thus, adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no impacts.

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 22 February 17, 2026

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

E. WOULD THE PROJECT INVOLVE OTHER CHANGES IN THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, WHICH, DUE

TO THEIR LOCATION OR NATURE, COULD RESULT IN CONVERSION OF FARMLAND, TO NON - AGRICULTURAL USE OR CONVERSION OF FOREST LAND TO NON-FOREST USE?

The proposed project would not involve other changes in the existing environments, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

827

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 23 February 17, 2026

4.3 AIR QUALITY

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?  B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?

C. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?  D. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH OR OBSTRUCT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN?

The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the application air quality plan.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN A CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE NET INCREASE OF ANY

CRITERIA POLLUTANT FOR WHICH THE PROJECT REGION IS NON -ATTAINMENT UNDER AN APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARD?

828

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 24 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS TO SUBSTANTIAL POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS?

The proposed project would not expose sensitive receptor to substantial pollutant concentrations.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN OTHER EMISSIONS (SUCH AS THOSE LEADING TO ODORS) ADVERSELY AFFECTING A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE?

The proposed project would not result in other emissions, such as those leading to odors, aversely affecting a substantial number of people.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

829

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 25 February 17, 2026

4.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?

B. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 
C. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 
D. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?

E. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?

F. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT, EITHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH

HABITAT MODIFICATIONS, ON ANY SPECIES IDENTIFIED AS A CANDIDATE, SENSITIVE, OR

SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS, OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE?

The proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

830

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 26 February 17, 2026 B. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON ANY RIPARIAN HABITAT OR

OTHER SENSITIVE NATURAL COMMUNITY IDENTIFIED IN LOCAL OR REGIONAL PLANS, POLICIES, REGULATIONS OR BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME OR U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE?

The proposed project would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON FEDERALLY PROTECTED WETLANDS AS DEFINED BY SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, MARSH, VERNAL POOL, COASTAL, ETC.) THROUGH DIRECT REMOVAL, FILLING, HYDROLOGICAL INTERRUPTION, OR OTHER MEANS?

The proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on F ederally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT INTERFERE SUBSTANTIALLY WITH THE MOVEMENT OF ANY NATIVE

RESIDENT OR MIGRATORY FISH OR WILDLIFE SPECIES OR WITH ESTABLISHED NATIVE RESIDENT

OR MIGRATORY WILDLIFE CORRIDORS, OR IMPEDE THE USE OF NATIVE WILDLIFE NURSERY SITES?

831

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 27 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

E. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH ANY LOCAL POLICIES OR ORDINANCES PROTECTING BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, SUCH AS A TREE PRESERVATION POLICY OR ORDINANCE?

The proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

F. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF AN ADOPTED HABITAT

CONSERVATION PLAN, NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN, OR OTHER APPROVED LOCAL, REGIONAL, OR STATE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN?

The proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

832

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 28 February 17, 2026

4.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5? 
B. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5?  C. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A HISTORICAL RESOURCE AS DEFINED IN CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15064.5?

The proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5
.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCE PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15064.5?

The proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

833

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 29 February 17, 2026 C. WOULD THE PROJECT DISTURB ANY HUMAN REMAINS, INCLUDING THOSE INTERRED OUTSIDE OF FORMAL CEMETERIES?

The proposed project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

834

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 30 February 17, 2026

4.6 ENERGY

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?

B. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DUE TO

WASTEFUL, INEFFICIENT, OR UNNECESSARY CONSUMPTION OF ENERGY RESOURCES, DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION OR OPERATION?

The proposed project would not result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH OR OBSTRUCT A STATE OR LOCAL PLAN FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY OR ENERGY EFFICIENCY?

The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

835

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 31 February 17, 2026

4.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
1) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 
2) Strong seismic ground shaking? 
3) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?  4) Landslides? 
B. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?  C. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? 
D. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?  E. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?

F. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CAUSE POTENTIAL SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS, INCLUDING THE RISK OF LOSS, INJURY, OR DEATH INVOLVING:

1. RUPTURE OF A KNOWN EARTHQUAKE FAULT, AS DELINEATED ON THE MOST RECENT ALQUIST-

PRIOLO EARTHQUAKE FAULT ZONING MAP ISSUED BY THE STATE GEOLOGIST FOR THE AREA OR BASED ON OTHER SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF A KNOWN FAULT? REFER TO DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION 42.

836

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 32 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent A lquist-Priolo earthquake fault zoning map issued by the state geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

2. STRONG SEISMIC GROUND SHAKING?

The proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

3. SEISMIC-RELATED GROUND FAILURE, INCLUDING LIQUEFACTION?

The proposed project would not directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

4. LANDSLIDES?

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

837

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 33 February 17, 2026 B. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL SOIL EROSION OR THE LOSS OF TOPSOIL?

Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regu lations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of top soil.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT BE LOCATED ON A GEOLOGIC UNIT OR SOIL THAT IS UNSTABLE, OR THAT

WOULD BECOME UNSTABLE AS A RESULT OF THE PROJECT, AND POTENTIALLY RESULT IN AN

ON-SITE OR OFF -SITE LANDSLIDE, LATERAL SPREADING, SUBSIDENCE, LIQUEFACTION OR COLLAPSE?

The proposed project would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in an on -site or off- site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT BE LOCATED ON EXPANSIVE SOIL, AS DEFINED IN TABLE 18 -1-B OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (1994), CREATING SUBSTANTIAL RISKS TO LIFE OR PROPERTY?

The proposed project would not be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-b of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

E. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE SOILS INCAPABLE OF ADEQUATELY SUPPORTING THE USE OF

SEPTIC TANKS OR ALTERNATIVE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL SYSTEMS WHERE SEWERS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE WATER?

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 34 February 17, 2026 Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

F. WOULD THE PROJECT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DESTROY A UNIQUE PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE OR SITE OR UNIQUE GEOLOGIC FEATURE?

The proposed project would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

839

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 35 February 17, 2026

4.8 GREENHOUSE GASES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? 
B. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 

A finding of “No New Impact/No Impact” means that the potential impact was fully analyzed and/or mitigated in the prior CEQA document and no new or different impacts will result from the proposed activity. A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No New Impact/No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No New Impact/No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No New Impact/No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THAT MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT?

The proposed project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH AN APPLICABLE PLAN, POLICY , OR REGULATION ADOPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF REDUCING THE EMISSIONS OF GREENHOUSE GASES?

840

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 36 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

841

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 37 February 17, 2026

4.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?  B. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?

C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?  D. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 
E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 
F. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS
A. WOULD THE PROJECT CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE ROUTINE TRANSPORT, USE, OR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials,

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT

THROUGH REASONABLY FORESEEABLE UPSET AND ACCIDENT CONDITIONS INVOLVING THE RELEASE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INTO THE ENVIRONMENT?

842

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 38 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT EMIT HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS OR HANDLE HAZARDOUS OR ACUTELY

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, SUBSTANCES, OR WASTE WITHIN ONE -QUARTER MILE OF AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED SCHOOL?
Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT BE LOCATED ON A SITE WHICH IS INCLUDED ON A LIST OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SITES COMPILED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65962.5 AND, AS A RESULT, WOULD IT CREATE A SIGNIFICANT HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC OR THE ENVIRONMENT?

The proposed project would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

E. FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN AN AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN OR, WHERE SUCH A PLAN HAS

NOT BEEN ADOPTED, WITHIN TWO MILES OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT OR PUBLIC USE AIRPORT,

WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN A SAFETY HAZARD FOR PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA?

843

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 39 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

F. WOULD THE PROJECT IMPAIR IMPLEMENTATION OF OR PHYSICALLY INTERFERE WITH AN ADOPTED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN OR EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN?

The proposed project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

844

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 40 February 17, 2026

4.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?  B. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?

C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:

1) Result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?  2) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 
3) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?

4) Impede or redirect flood flows? 
D. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?

E. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT VIOLATE ANY WATER QUALITY STANDARDS OR WASTE DISCHARGE

REQUIREMENTS OR OTHERWISE SUBSTANTIALLY DEGRADE SURFACE OR GROUND WATER QUALITY?

The proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

845

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 41 February 17, 2026 B. WOULD THE PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY DECREASE GROUNDWATER SUPPLIES OR INTERFERE

SUBSTANTIALLY WITH GROUNDWATER RECHARGE SUCH THAT THE PROJECT MAY IMPEDED SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT OF THE BASIN?

The proposed project would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impeded sustainable groundwater management of the basin.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY ALTER THE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE SITE

OR AREA, INCLUDING THROUGH THE ALTERATION OF THE COURSE OF STREAM OR RIVER, IN A MANNER WHICH WOULD:

1. RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL EROSION OR SILTATION ON- OR OFF-SITE? Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of stream or river, in a manner which would : 1-result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

2. SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE RATE OR AMOUNT OF SURFACE RUNOFF IN A MANNER WHICH WOULD RESULT IN FLOODING ON- OR OFF-SITE?
Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project -specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

846

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 42 February 17, 2026 C3. CREATE OR CONTRIBUTE RUNOFF WATER WHICH WOULD EXCEED THE CAPACITY OF EXISTING

OR PLANNED STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS OR PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF POLLUTED RUNOFF?

The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C4. IMPEDE OR REDIRECT FLOOD FLOWS?

The proposed project would not impede or redirect flood flows.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT IN FLOOD HAZARD, TSUNAMI, OR SEICHE ZONES, RISK RELEASE OF POLLUTANTS DUE TO PROJECT INUNDATION?

The proposed project would not be in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

847

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 43 February 17, 2026

4.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Physically divide an established community? 
B. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT PHYSICALLY DIVIDE AN ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY?

The proposed project would not physically divide an established comment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DUE TO A CONFLICT

WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND USE PLAN, POLICY, OR REGULATION ADOPTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING OR MITIGATING AN ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT?

The proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact. 848

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 44 February 17, 2026

4.12 MINERAL RESOURCES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?  B. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN THE LOSS OF AVAILABILITY OF A KNOWN MINERAL RESOURCE THAT WOULD BE OF VALUE TO THE REGION AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE STATE?

The proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN THE LOSS OF AVAILABILITY OF A LOCALLY -IMPORTANT

MINERAL RESOURCE RECOVERY SITE DELINEATED ON A LOCAL GENERAL PLAN, SPECIFIC PLAN, OR OTHER LAND USE PLAN?

849

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 45 February 17, 2026 The proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, Specific Plan, or other land use plan.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

850

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 46 February 17, 2026

4.13 NOISE

Would the project result in:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 
B. Generation of excessive ground-borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels?  C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN GENERATION OF A SUBSTANTIAL TEMPORARY OR

PERMANENT INCREASE IN AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT IN EXCESS

OF STANDARDS ESTABLISHED IN THE LOCAL GENERAL PLAN OR NOISE ORDINANCE, OR APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF OTHER AGENCIES?

The proposed project would not result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN GENERATION OF EXCESSIVE GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION OR GROUNDBORNE NOISE LEVELS?

The proposed project would not result in generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or ground-borne noise levels.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

851

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 47 February 17, 2026 C. FOR A PROJECT LOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A PRIVATE AIRSTRIP OR AN AIRPORT LAND

USE PLAN OR, WHERE SUCH A PLAN HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED, WITHIN TWO MILES OF A PUBLIC

AIRPORT OR PUBLIC USE AIRPORT, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE PROJECT AREA TO EXCESSIVE NOISE LEVELS?

The proposed project would not be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

852

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 48 February 17, 2026

4.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?

b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT INDUCE SUBSTANTIAL UNPLANNED POPULATION GROWTH IN AN AREA,

EITHER DIRECTLY (FOR EXAMPLE, BY PROPOSING NEW HOMES AND BUSINESSES) OR INDIRECTLY (FOR EXAMPLE, THROUGH EXTENSION OF ROADS OR OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE)?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure).

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT DISPLACE SUBSTANTIAL NUMBERS OF EXISTING PEOPLE OR HOUSING, NECESSITATING THE CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT HOUSING ELSEWHERE?

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 49 February 17, 2026 requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not
displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

854

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 50 February 17, 2026

4.15 PUBLIC SERVICES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

1) Fire protection? 
2) Police protection? 
3) Schools? 
4) Parks? 
5) Other public facilities? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE PHYSICAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED

WITH THE PROVISION OF NEW OR PHYSICALLY ALTERED GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES, NEED

FOR NEW OR PHYSICALLY ALTERED GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OF

WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICA NT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN

ACCEPTABLE SERVICE RATIOS, RESPONSE TIMES OR OTHER PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES FOR ANY OF THE PUBLIC SERVICES:

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

1. FIRE PROTECTION?
Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

2. POLICE PROTECTION?

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

3. SCHOOLS?

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

855

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 51 February 17, 2026

4. PARKS?

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

5. OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES?

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

856

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 52 February 17, 2026

4.16 RECREATION

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?

B. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT INCREASE THE USE OF EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD AND REGIONAL PARKS

OR OTHER RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SUCH THAT SUBSTANTIAL PHYSICAL DETERIORATION OF THE FACILITY WOULD OCCUR OR BE ACCELERATED?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. DOES THE PROJECT INCLUDE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES OR REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION OR

EXPANSION OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WHICH MIGHT HAVE AN ADVERSE PHYSICAL EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT?

The proposed project would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

857

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 53 February 17, 2026

4.17 TRANSPORTATION

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?  B. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b)?

C. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 
D. Result in inadequate emergency access? 

IMPACT ANALYSIS

Downtown Specific Plan Roadway Modifications Operational Analysis

As part of the ongoing Downtown Specific Plan effort, W-Trans prepared an operational analysis of the study area in the City of Lodi. W -Trans documented the operations of 15 study intersections in Downtown Lodi and what operational effects there may be with the proposed Lockeford Street Road Diet, Locust Street Closure, Sacramento Street Closure, and combinations of these roadway modifications.

Existing Conditions

Study Area
The following intersections were selected for operational analysis in conjunction with City of Lodi staff. The location of these intersections within the Downtown Specific Plan area are identified below.

1. Lockeford Street/Pleasant Avenue

2. Lockeford Street/Church Street

3. Lockeford Street/Sacramento Street

4. Lockeford Street/Main Street

5. Lockeford Street/Stockton Street

6. Locust Street/Sacramento Street

7. Locust Street/Main Street

8. Elm Street/Church Street

9. Elm Street/Sacramento Street

10. Elm Street/Main Street

11. Pine Street/Church Street

12. Pine Street/Sacramento Street

13. Lodi Avenue/School Street

14. Lodi Avenue/Sacramento Street

15. Lodi Avenue/Stockton Street

Operating conditions during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods were evaluated to capture the highest volumes on the local transportation network and therefore worst-case intersection operations. The morning peak hour occurs between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and reflects conditions during the home to work or school commute, while the p.m. 858

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 54 February 17, 2026 peak hour occurs between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. and typically reflects the highest level of congestion during the homeward bound commute.

Methodology
Level of Service (LOS) is used to rank traffic operation on various types of facilities based on traffic volumes and roadway capacity using a series of letter designations ranging from A to F. Generally, Level of Service A represents free flow conditions and Level of Service F represents forced flow or breakdown conditions. A unit of measure that indicates a level of delay generally accompanies the LOS designation. The study intersections were analyzed using the signalized and unsignalized intersection meth odologies published in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Seventh Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022.

The General Plan, City of Lodi, August 2009, lists Policy T-P12 which states that a standard of LOS E applies during peak hour congestion on all streets under the City’s jurisdiction for the purpose of design review and environmental assessment. However, Policy T-P10 specifically exempts the Downtown area from LOS standards, where the Downtown is defined as the area with “Downtown Mixed-Use” zoning. This area is generally coterminal with the Specific Plan boundary, and includes all 15 study intersections.

Operational Analysis
Intersection operation was evaluated based on existing traffic volumes during the a.m. and p.m. peak periods.

Volume data was collected on December 3, 2024, and April 29, 2025, while local schools were in session. Under existing conditions, all intersections have acceptable overall operations of LOS A or LOS B, and the minor approaches for two -way stop -controlled intersections are operating at LOS C or better. A summary of the intersection Level of Service calculations is contained in Table 4.17-1, Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service.

Roadway Modifications - Lockeford Street Road Diet
Lockeford Street is a two -lane road for most of its 2.7 -mile alignment between North Guild Avenue and North Mills Avenue, but widens to four lanes for the one -third of a mile between North Church Street and North California Street. Average Daily Traffic data from 2023 provided by the City indicates that this four- lane segment has a lower volume of 7,850 vehicles per day than the adjacent two -lane segment between North Church Street and North Stockton Street which has 8,840 vehicles per day, or the two -lane segment between North Stockton Street and North Cherokee Lane with 8,450 vehicles per day. Therefore, there is potential to reduce this stretch to two lanes to better align the segment with the remainder of the Lockeford Street alignment, provide a traffic calming benefit, and enable the excess right -of-way to be used for bicycle infrastructure, bioretention basins, landscaping, parking, turn lanes, or other such uses.

The portion of this segment between North Church Street and North Pleasant Avenue is within the Downtown Specific Plan area. Therefore, these intersections were evaluated with a potential four- to-two lane road diet in place. Conservatively, turn lanes were not included in the analysis though would result in improved operations if implemented. As shown in Table 4.17-2, Lockeford Road Diet Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service, converting Lockeford Street to two lanes would slightly increase delays at these intersections while retaining LOS C or better operation.

Locust Street Closure
During the February 2025 design charrette for this project, one idea brainstormed among community members and the project team was to designate Locust Street as a bicycle boulevard to provide connectivity between North Main Street and areas west of the railroad tracks on a facility that is separate from the busier streets of Lockeford Street or Lodi Avenue. A key design principle of bicycle boulevards is discouraging vehicular traffic from traveling along the corridor with intermittent vehicle blockades that permit bicyclists to pass through. In other words, while 859

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 55 February 17, 2026 all local access would be preserved, a driver seeking to traverse the Downtown east to west or vice versa would need to do so on Lockeford Street or Elm Street whereas a bicyclist could use Locust Street.

To achieve this goal, consideration was given to severing through vehicle access on Locust Street across the railroad tracks. Local access to parcels adjacent to Locust Street would be retained as would bicycle and pedestrian access across the tracks, but vehicles would no longer be able to cross the tracks on Locust Street. This would have the added benefit of removing one vehicle crossing from a potential future quiet zone conversion, where enhanced railroad crossing design features would enable trains to pass through Downtown without needing to sound their horns except in the case of an emergency.

With access on Locust Street between North Sacramento Street and North Main Street severed, vehicular traffic would need to route north to Lockeford Street or south to Elm Street to cross the railroad tracks. Based on traffic counts obtained on Locust Street, this would affect around 20 to 35 vehicles in each direction during each peak hour. For comparison, around 400 to 500 vehicles cross the railroad tracks on Lockeford Street in each direction during each peak hour, as do 500 to 700 vehicles per direction per peak hour on Lodi Avenue.

The operational results at the study intersections that would be most likely to be affected by this closure are shown in Table 4.17-3, Locust Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service. The change in delays would be relatively minor, including some locations where delay would decrease slightly, but overall operations would remain at LOS C or better. It is noted that with this configuration, Locust Street/Main Street was assessed as being converted to all-way stop control to avoid having a T-intersection with stop controls on the through legs and free flow conditions on the terminating leg.

Sacramento Street Closure
Another street closure discussed at the February 2025 design charrette focuses on the block of Sacramento Street between Pine Street and Elm Street. Currently, there are no businesses that directly front this block other than an office adjacent to the Pine Street/Sacramento Street intersection, and the World of Wonders Science Museum. It is understood that the Museum is desiring to expand across the street and would be in favor of this closure to provide additional plaza space between the existing Museum and expanded facilities. It is noted that the adjacent parking garage has access from Pine Street and Elm Street, but critically does not take direct vehicular access from Sacramento Street so would be unaffected by the closure.

Similar to the potential Locust Street Closure, the Sacramento Street Closure was operationally evaluated for the effects of diverting traffic to adjacent streets. This would include around 30 to 40 vehicles in each direction during the a.m. peak hour and 80 to 120 vehicles in each direction during the p.m. peak hour. As shown in Table 4.17-4, Sacramento Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service, operations would remain at LOS A or LOS B with these changes.

Combination of Roadway Modifications
An additional scenario was assessed with the Lockeford Road Diet, Locust Street Closure, and Sacramento Street Closure combined to evaluate the effect of implementing all three roadway modification scenarios. The results of this combination scenario is pre sented in Table 4.17-5, Combination of Roadway Modifications Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service, though it is noted that only Elm Street/Sacramento Street and Elm Street/Main Street would have effects from both the Locust Street Closure and Sacramento Street Closure, while all other intersections would be affected by at most one roadway modification scenario. Lockeford Street/ Stockton Street and the three Lodi Avenue intersections would not be affected by any of the potential scenarios, so are provided for informational purposes only.

860

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 56 February 17, 2026 Table 1
Existing Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Source: W-Trans, January 26, 2026

861

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 57 February 17, 2026 Table 2
Lockeford Road Diet Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Source: W-Trans, January 26, 2026

862

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 58 February 17, 2026 Table 3
Locust Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Source: W-Trans, January 26, 2026

863

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 59 February 17, 2026 Table 4
Sacramento Street Closure Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Source: W-Trans, January 26, 2026

864

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 60 February 17, 2026 Table 5
Combination of Roadway Modifications Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service

Source: W-Trans, January 26, 2026

865

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 61 February 17, 2026 A. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT WITH AN APPLICABLE PLAN, ORDINANCE OR POLICY

ADDRESSING THE CIRCULATION, INCLUDING TRANSIT, ROADWAY, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities , as 1) all 15 intersections evaluated are operating at LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours , and 2) LOS C or better operation would be retained with implementation of the Lockeford Road Diet, Locust Street Closure, Sacramento Street Closure, or all three roadway modifications.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as a less than significant impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT CONFLICT OR BE INCONSISTENT WITH CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15064.3 SUBDIVISION (B)?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 subdivision (b).

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE HAZARDS DUE TO A DESIGN FEATURE (E.G., SHARP CURVES OR DANGEROUS INTERSECTIONS) OR INCOMPATIBLE USES (E.G., FARM EQUIPMENT)?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment).

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

866

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 62 February 17, 2026 D. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN INADEQUATE EMERGENCY ACCESS?

The proposed project would not result in inadequate emergency access.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

867

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 63 February 17, 2026

4.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

1) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in the local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?

2) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE IN THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCE, DEFINED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21074 AS EITHER

A SITE, FEATURE, PLACE, CULTURAL LANDSCAPE THAT IS GEOGRAPHICALLY DEFINED IN TERMS

OF THE SIZE AND SCOPE OF THE LANDSCAPE, SACRED PLACE, OR OBJECT WITH CULTURAL VALUE TO A CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE, AND THAT IS:

1. LISTED OR ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES, OR

IN THE LOCAL REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES AS DEFINED IN PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 5020.1(K)?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in P ublic Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is:

1. Listed or eligible for listing in the California register of historical resources, or in the local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?

868

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 64 February 17, 2026 Further, the Focused General Plan Update adopted in 2025 provided notification and offered tribal consultations in compliance with AB 52 and SB 18. On December 20, 2024, notification letters were sent to the 10 tribes listed by the Native American Heritage Commission. None of the contacted tribes requested consultation. As the Specific Plan implements the land use changes addressed in the Focused General Plan Update, no further consultation is required.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

2. A RESOURCE DETERMINED BY THE LEAD AGENCY, IN ITS DISCRETION AND SUPPORTED BY

SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, TO BE SIGNIFICANT PURSUANT TO CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION (C) OF PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 5024.1? IN APPLYING THE CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISI ON (C) OF PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 5024.1, THE LEAD AGENCY

SHALL CONSIDER THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESOURCE TO A CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBE.

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would determine a resource by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of P ublic Resources Code section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American Tribe.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

869

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 65 February 17, 2026

4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?

B. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?  C. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? 
D. Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?

E. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT REQUIRE OR RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW

OR EXPANDED WATER, WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR STORM WATER DRAINAGE, ELECTRIC

POWER, NATURAL GAS, OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OR RELOCATION OF WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. WOULD THE PROJECT HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLIES AVAILABLE TO SERVE THE PROJECT

AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DURING NORMAL, DRY, AND MULTIPLE DRY YEARS?

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 66 February 17, 2026 State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. WOULD THE PROJECT RESULT IN A DETERMINATION BY THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT

PROVIDER, WHICH SERVES OR MAY SERVE THE PROJECT THAT IT HAS ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO SERVE THE PROJECT’S PROJECTED DEMAND IN ADDITION TO THE PROVIDER’S EXISTING COMMITMENTS?

The proposed project would result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. WOULD THE PROJECT GENERATE SOLID WASTE IN EXCESS OF STATE OR LOCAL STANDARDS, OR

IN EXCESS OF THE CAPACITY OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OR OTHERWISE IMPAIR THE ATTAINMENT OF SOLID WASTE REDUCTION GOALS?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project could
generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

871

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 67 February 17, 2026 E. WOULD THE PROJECT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT AND REDUCTION STATUTES AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO SOLID WASTE?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

872

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 68 February 17, 2026

4.20 WILDFIRE

Would the project:

New
Potentially
Significant
Impact
New Impact
Requiring
New
Mitigation
No New
Impact/
No Impact
Reduced
Impact
A. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? 
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

B. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

C. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

D. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

E. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?


IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE OR STRUCTURES, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO A SIGNIFICANT RISK OF LOSS, INJURY, OR DEATH INVOLVING WILDLAND FIRES?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact. 873

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 69 February 17, 2026 B. IF LOCATED IN OR NEAR STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREAS OR LANDS CLASSIFIED AS HIGH FIRE

HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES, SUBSTANTIALLY IMPAIR AN ADOPTED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN OR EMERGENCY EVACUATION PLAN?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project, if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones, could substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. IF LOCATED IN OR NEAR STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREAS OR LANDS CLASSIFIED AS HIGH FIRE

HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES, WOULD THE PROJECT, DUE TO SLOPE, PREVAILING WINDS, AND

OTHER FACTORS, EXACERBATE WILDFIRE RISKS, AND THEREBY EXPOSE PROJECT OCCUPANTS

TO POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM A WILDFIRE OR THE UNCONTROLLED SPREAD OF A WILDFIRE?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project, if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones, could the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. IF LOCATED IN OR NEAR STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREAS OR LANDS CLASSIFIED AS HIGH FIRE

HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES, WOULD THE PROJECT REQUIRE THE INSTALLATION OR

MAINTENANCE OF ASSOCIATED INFRASTRUCTURE (SUCH AS ROADS, FUEL BREAKS,

EMERGENCY WATER SOURCES, POWER LIN ES, OR OTHER UTILITIES) THAT MAY EXACERBATE

FIRE RISK OR THAT MAY RESULT IN TEMPORARY OR ONGOING IMPACTS TO THE ENVIRONMENT?

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 70 February 17, 2026 The proposed project, if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones, the project may require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

E. IF LOCATED IN OR NEAR STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREAS OR LANDS CLASSIFIED AS HIGH FIRE

HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES, WOULD THE PROJECT EXPOSE PEOPLE OR STRUCTURES TO

SIGNIFICANT RISKS, INCLUDING DOWNSLOPE OR DOWNSTREAM FLOODING OR LANDSLIDES, AS A RESULT OF RUNOFF, POST-FIRE SLOPE INSTABILITY, OR DRAINAGE CHANGES?

The proposed project, if located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones, the project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

875

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 71 February 17, 2026

4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Would the project:

IMPACT ANALYSIS
A. REQUIRE OR RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW OR EXPANDED WATER,

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR STORM WATER DRAINAGE, ELECTRIC POWER, NATURAL GAS,

OR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES, THE CONSTRUCTION OR RELOCATION OF WHICH COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project may r equire or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects, as identified by utility providers.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

B. HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLIES AVAILABLE TO SERVE THE PROJECT AND REASONABLY FORESEEABLE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT DURING NORMAL, DRY, AND MULTIPLE DRY YEARS? The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code 876

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 72 February 17, 2026 requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibility, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would require sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, as applicable by water agencies.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

C. RESULT IN A DETERMINATION BY THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROVIDER, WHICH SERVES OR MAY SERVE THE PROJECT, THAT IT HAS ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO SERVE THE PROJECT’S PROJECTED DEMAND IN ADDITION TO THE PROVIDER’S EXISTING COMMITMENTS? The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project will provide adequate capacity to serve the proposed project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

D. GENERATE SOLID WASTE IN EXCESS OF STATE OR LOCAL STANDARDS, OR IN EXCESS OF THE

CAPACITY OF LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE, OR OTHERWISE IMPAIR THE ATTAINMENT OF SOLID WASTE REDUCTION GOALS?
The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

877

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 73 February 17, 2026 E. COMPLY WITH FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL MANAGEMENT AND REDUCTION STATUTES AND REGULATIONS RELATED TO SOLID WASTE?

The majority of the City is built out with urban land uses and established development. Future development proposals within the proposed Downtown Specific Plan Amendment would be required to comply with all plan check requirements and project-specific conditions, including required technical studies; applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; General Plan goals, policies, and implementation programs; Municipal Code requirements; development standards (site and building design, mixed use, compatibili ty, and performance standards); and Standard Mitigation Measures and Conditions.

The proposed project would comply with F ederal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste.

Adoption and implementation of the proposed project ensure impacts remain as no new impact/no impact.

878

Addendum for Lodi Downtown Specific Plan 74 February 17, 2026

4.22 CEQA DETERMINATION

NEW SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE

SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS COMPARED TO THOSE IDENTIFIED IN THE

PREVIOUS CEQA DOCUMENT

The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or to be previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change in project, change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance.

Aesthetics Land Use and Planning
Agriculture and Forestry Resources Mineral Resources
Air Quality Noise
Biological Resources Population and Housing
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Public Services Energy Recreation
Geology and Soils Transportation
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Wildfire
Hydrology and Water Quality Mandatory Findings of Significance

As shown in the table above, t here are no new significant environmental impacts or previously identified significant impacts made more severe by project modifications, new circumstances, or new information associated with the project.

As such, an Addendum to the Lodi 2025 General Update (June 2025) and 2035 General Plan Update Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (June 2025) for the Downtown Specific Plan is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document to address project modifications in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c) provides than an Addendum need not be circulated for public review.
879
75 5.0 LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATION

On the basis of this evaluation:

No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous approved ND or MND or certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously adopted ND or MND or previously certified EIR is adequately discusses the potential impacts of the project without modification.

No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous approved ND or MND or certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously adopted ND, MND or previously certified EIR adequately discusses the potential impacts of the project; however, minor changes require the preparation of an ADDENDUM.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous ND, MND or EIR due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However, all new potentially si gnificant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant effects are clearly reduced to below a level of significance through the incorporation of mitigation measures agreed to by the project applicant.

Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT MND is required.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous environmental document due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However, only minor changes or additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project in the changed situation. Therefore, a SUPPLEMENTAL EIR is required.

880
881
882
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LODI APPROVING

THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (DTSP) PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65450 ET SEQ. (2026-01)
========================================================================

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lodi has heretofore held a duly noticed public hearing, as required by law in accordance with California Government Code Section 65453 and applicable City noticing procedures; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lodi has prepared the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) as a long- range visioning, policy, and implementation document intended to guide future land use, mobility, urban design, placemaking, infrastructure planning, and economic development within the Downtown area; and

WHEREAS, specific plans are authorized pursuant to California Government Code Section 65450 et seq. to implement the goals and policies of a city’s General Plan through more detailed planning guidance and implementation strategies; and

WHEREAS, the DTSP builds upon the success of the established historic downtown core and provides a framework to guide reinvestment, improve connectivity, enhance multimodal mobility, and support compatible infill development within the expanded Downtown Mixed-Use area, including the Main Street corridor east of the railroad tracks; and

WHEREAS, the DTSP supports broader City objectives related to downtown revitalization, economic development, multimodal transportation, housing opportunity, placemaking, sustainability, public health, and implementation of the General Plan, Housing Element, Environmental Justice Element, and Economic Development Strategic Plan; and

WHEREAS, preparation of the DTSP included extensive community outreach, stakeholder engagement, and public participation beginning in 2024, including Steering Committee meetings, public workshops, open houses, stakeholder interviews, business outreach, online engagement opportunities, Planning Commission and City Council study sessions, and ongoing project updates through PlanLodi.com; and

WHEREAS, the DTSP also included coordination and discussions with Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) regarding mobility, railroad crossings, quiet zone analysis, and potential future lease or acquisition opportunities associated with UPRR-owned parcels adjacent to Main Street; and

WHEREAS, the DTSP is intended to support future implementation and funding opportunities, including potential State, regional, and local grant programs related to infrastructure, mobility, housing , sustainability, placemaking, climate resilience, and downtown revitalization; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on May 13, 2026, in accordance with Government Code Section 65090, considered public testimony and the administrative record, and adopted Resolution No. P.C. 26 -04 recommending City Council approval of the Downtown Specific Plan; and

883
WHEREAS, the Downtown Specific Plan has been evaluated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.); and

WHEREAS, the City of Lodi is the Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15051 and 15367, and envir onmental review for the DTSP relies upon the previously certified 2025 Focused General Plan Update Subsequent Environmental Impact Report and an Addendum prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164; and

WHEREAS, the Addendum concludes that adoption of the Downtown Specific Plan would not result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts, and that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65454, the City Council must find that the Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan prior to adoption; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the administrat ive record, staff report, environmental documentation, and all oral and written public testimony and finds that the Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and establishes a coordinated framework to guide the future evolution of Downtown Lodi.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds that, based upon substantial evidence in the record:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

2. The City Council hereby finds:

a. The Downtown Specific Plan has been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 65450 et seq.; and

b. The Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the City of Lodi General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65454; and

c. The environmental effects of the Downtown Specific Plan have been adequately evaluated pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, and the Addendum prepared for the project satisfies CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164; and

d. None of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present; and

e. The Downtown Specific Plan establishes a long -range policy and implementation framework intended to guide fut ure decision -making over time and does not itself authorize specific construction projects or funding commitments; and

f. Future implementation actions, including but not limited to zoning code amendments, infrastructure improvements, funding authorizati ons, capital projects, development agreements, design standards, mobility improvements, and related implementation 884
measures, may require separate environmental review, discretionary approvals, budget appropriations, or additional City Council consideration and approval, as applicable; and

g. The City Council has conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered all information presented prior to taking action.

3. The City Council hereby adopts the Downtown Specific Plan (DTSP) and Appendices attached hereto as Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference.

Dated: June 3, 2026
======================================================================== I hereby certify that Resolution No. 20 26-____ was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Lodi in a regular meeting held June 3, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS –
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS –
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS –

OLIVIA NASHED
City Clerk

2026-_____
885
AGENDA ITEM F.2

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
AGENDA TITLE:

Public Hearing to Consider Adopting a Resolution Approving the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) (CD)
MEETING DATE:

June 3, 2026
PREPARED BY:

Jennifer Rhyne, Neighborhood Services Manager
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Public hearing to consider adopting a resolution approving the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

A public hearing is required as part of the federal requirements under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.

Overview
The overall goal of the CDBG program is to serve low- and moderate-income persons by developing viable urban communities through the following actions: providing decent housing; providing a suitable living environment; and expanding economic opportunities. The City of Lodi is an entitlement jurisdiction under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and receives an annual allocation directly from HUD, with funding levels determined through HUD’sallocation methodology based on factors such as population, poverty, housing conditions, and community needs.

Each year the City prepares an Annual Action Plan that identifies the services and projects to fund that will meet the Consolidated Plan Goals. The 2024-2028 Consolidated Plan is a five-year planning document for the CDBG program. It outlines the City actions to be undertaken during those five years in relation to capital improvements, economic development, public services, infrastructure improvements, housing, homelessness, special needs, and other various community development type activities, of which are identified by the City and the community. The 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan presents a detailed description of each activity proposed for the next CDBG program year, as well as the City’s CDBG budget and goals for that year.

Staff took into consideration the opinions of residents, community stakeholders, community-based organizations, the Lodi Improvement Committee, City staff, and various other professional and influential members of the community to decide on which goals would best address the identified priority needs. The result was the creation of six (6) primary goals that would be the focus over the five-year period:

Improve Public and Community Facilities
• Improve, renovate, update and or modernize community, social service and or public owned facilities.

Preserve and Increase Affordable Housing
• Rehabilitate and preserve existing housing stock, acquire land and or partner with agencies or housing City of Lodi Printed on 5/29/2026Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
886

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
development entities to build new affordable housing.

Support Critical Public Services
• Support local non-profits and social services to provide critical community services.

Encourage Fair Housing Practices
• Support the City and its partners to implement best fair housing practices.

Reduce Homelessness
• Reduce homelessness through support of public services, shelter operations, and shelter development.

Planning and Administration
• Support City staff to plan and administer CDBG entitlement funds.

Annual Action Plan
The 2026-27 Annual Action Plan is the third of five annual action plans for the 2024-28 CDBG period and includes the budget for the program year, as well as the proposed projects and allocations for each project.

The CDBG award amount for the City of Lodi for the 2026-27 program year is $665,263. The City has a guideline of allocating 40 percent of the annual CDBG award (net of administrative costs) to community-based organizations (CBOs), with the remainder allocated to City projects. Also, HUD places a yearly 15 percent cap on funds spent on public services.

Based upon the estimated allocation, the distribution of funds will be as follows:

Capital projects $434,263 (Includes project cost and activity delivery/admin costs) CBO projects $ 98,000 (15% Cap)
Administration $133,000 (20% Cap - Includes fair housing activities) TOTAL $665,263
The City received three applications for capital projects requesting over $434,000. In addition, the City of Lodi Graffiti Abatement Program will be receiving $15,000 out of the Administration funding since it was determined that it could no longer be funded under Capital projects. The CBO projects, a portion of the Graffiti Abatement Program, and Program Administration will be awarded funding out of the Public Service funds as listed below:

Program Administration
Planning and Administration $78,000
TBD - Fair Housing Services $40,000 (estimate due to request for proposals pending. City Staff is currently providing services)
Graffiti Abatement $15,000
City Service Programs
Graffiti Abatement Program (Public Services Funds) $15,000 CBO Service Programs
Community Partnership for Families - Family Resource Center $29,500 PREVAIL - Propel Program $16,000
Second Harvest Food Bank - Food Assistance $10,000
LOEL Senior Center - Meals on Wheels $10,000
The Salvation Army - Hope Harbor Operations $17,500
City Capital Project Programs (allocation includes activity delivery costs) Public Works Project - $235,000
CBO Capital Project Programs (allocation includes activity delivery costs) DCDC/HACSJ - Salas Park - $115,000
City of Lodi Printed on 5/29/2026Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
887

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Other Miscellaneous Capital Projects
Specific projects not yet determined - $84,263
The review of the applications centered on the rating criteria that focuses on the following areas:
•Serving Priority Populations. Programs and projects were evaluated on whether they serve targeted priority populations, as identified in the Consolidated Plan. •Activity Need and Justification. Activities were evaluated on their ability to address a significant community need and their benefit to very low-income persons.
•Readiness to Proceed. Programs and projects were evaluated based on their feasibility of implementation, overall and within the allotted time frame.
•Cost Reasonableness and Effectiveness. Budgets were reviewed to determine completeness and reasonableness of all costs related to the request for CDBG funding. Organizations applying for service funding were also evaluated on their ability to become self-sustaining. •Activity Management and Implementation. Applicants were evaluated on past experience, administrative capacity, and financial management.
•Past Performance. Applicants previously receiving CDBG funds from the City were evaluated on their reporting and timely expenditure of funds
Funding Allocation
HUD has released the amount of CDBG awards for the 2026-27 program year. The City will receive $665,263.

The City has a guideline of allocating 40 percent of the annual CDBG award (net of administrative costs) to community-based organizations (CBOs), with the remainder going to City projects. There is a 15 percent public service cap on the overall annual allocation.

The Draft 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan was made available for public review and comment for 30-days beginning May 2, 2026 and will be brought forward for final approval. The submission deadline for the Annual Action Plan is early June and staff is confident in meeting that deadline in order to receive funding beginning July 1, 2026.

Next Steps
Upon City Council approval of the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan, City staff will submit to HUD for approval.

The plan is due to HUD by August 2026, but will be submitted by the end of June 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable.

FUNDING AVAILABLE:

Revenue and appropriations have been included in the 2026-27 Fiscal Year budget submission for the Community Development Department.

City of Lodi Printed on 5/29/2026Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
888
Annual Action Plan

1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)

1. Introduction
The City of Lodi’s (City) mission is to enhance the quality of life for all Lodi residents. Through the propagation and implementation of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, the City has been able to further uphold and actualize this mission. The overall goal of the CDBG program is to develop viable urban communities by providing decent and affordable housing, providing a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities. This goal is realized by directing funds that are received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to programs, policies, and goals that serve extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-income persons.

To effectively direct and allocate the CDBG funds received by HUD in the most useful and efficient ways possible, the City is required to create a five-year Consolidated Plan and subsequent Annual Action Plan (AAP) for submission to HUD. The 2026-27 AAP serves as:

1. A planning document for the City of Lodi, which is built on a community-oriented participatory process.

2. An application for federal funds under HUD's CDBG formula grants programs.

3. A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs.

4. An outline of specific projects, programs, and expectations to be undertaken during the 2026-27 program year.

Annual Action Plan Time Frame
The 2026-27 AAP covers the time frame from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027, which is the length of one complete CDBG program year. All projects and programs funded during this period will be expected to be completed by June 30, 2027.

2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan.

The goal of the 2026-27 AAP is to provide a one-year plan that outlines the City’s strategy to implement its five-year strategic plan goals, as they are represented in the City’s 2024-28 Consolidated Plan. The AAP further identifies the activities and funding allocations for the 2026-27 program year, as well as the activities, projects, and accomplishments that are proposed to be supported by the City’s annual CDBG allocation. The CDBG program works to support affordable housing, social services, and community 889
Annual Action Plan

2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
development initiatives in the City, and lays out data-driven, community-based investment decisions to facilitate the most sustainable and comprehensive future for the City’s housing, community, environmental, infrastructural, and economic progression. Through data collection, outreach, and analysis presented in this plan, a clear outline of the 2026-27 program year is formed.

This plan lays out specific projects that will be supported during the 2026-27 program year; details on these projects and the needs and goals that they support can be found in section AP-35. The following is a general list of projects and programs to be supported in the 2026-27 program year:
• Fair housing services
• Family and youth services
• Homeless services and prevention
• Graffiti abatement
• Meal and emergency food services for seniors and low-income individuals • Capital improvements for nonprofit agencies that serve low-income households

3. Evaluation of past performance
This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects.

The 2024-25 Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) was submitted to HUD on September 29, 2025. The Final 2024-25 CAPER is available on the City’s website.

The City reviews each subrecipient’s grant performance and financial documentation on a quarterly basis, at minimum. At the time of drafting, the 2025-26 program year was in its third quarter. Service providers have reported progress on meeting their activity goals. Subrecipients are selected for more in- depth monitoring based on certain criteria. The City has completed its monitoring for the 2024-25 program year in accordance with its policies and found no concerns during its review.

4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan.
-May 2, 2026-notice of 30-day comment period and 6/3 public hearing -May 2, 2026-26-27 AAP available on City website
-June 3, 2026-City council public hearing to adopt 26-27 AAP

5. Summary of public comments
This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan.
890
Annual Action Plan

3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
[summary of comment received]

6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them [summary of comment not accepted and the reasons for not]

7. Summary
N/A
891
Annual Action Plan

4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies – 91.200(b)

1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator LODI Community Development Department Table 1 – Responsible Agencies

Narrative (optional)
The Community Development Department – Neighborhood Services Division is responsible for overseeing the administration of the City’s CDBG funding, including the preparation of the Consolidated Plan, AAPs, and CAPERs. The CDD Program Specialist along with the CDBG program consultant operates the daily administration of the program, and the City Manager and Neighborhood Services Manager oversee these operations. The Lodi Improvement Committee is also involved with evaluating the CDBG public services applications.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Mailing Address:

City of Lodi
Attention: Neighborhood Services
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi CA, 95241-1910
Physical Address:
221 West Pine Street
Lodi CA, 95240
Telephone: (209) 330-8890
Email: [email protected]
892
Annual Action Plan

5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l)

1. Introduction
In preparing the Annual Action Plan, the City consulted and gathered information from a variety of agencies, including city departments, service programs, local and regional community based organizations, and various other organizations.

The goal of the consultation process was to gather data to help determine any updates in the priority needs of Lodi residents, as well as finding opportunities for coordination to improve the availability of and access to services, housing, and quality of life within the community.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(l))
The City coordinated with several service providers and organizations that specialize in public and assisted housing sectors, as well as various other special needs services on a local and regional scale.

The City’s public housing agency is HACSJ, which operates on behalf of the whole county. Staff recently coordinated with HACSJ on the rehabilitation of Creekside South, a 40-unit apartment complex. Staff also supported a project, the Seniors at Lodi Commons (Salas Park), which is a 54-unit senior and veteran project. Coordination efforts between the City and HACSJ will need to continually be supported to help create new opportunities for affordable housing in the City, and to ensure that the properties managed by HACSJ in Lodi are being used in the most efficient way to better assist low-income individuals and families, and families at risk of homelessness, in Lodi.

Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.

Building on years of coordination, both during this and previous Consolidated Plan cycles, the City continues to support the San Joaquin Continuum of Care (CoC) with various efforts to end homelessness in the County. Its main goals, as identified by the chair of the CoC, are aimed at prioritizing efforts that actively move homeless households into permanent housing, provide actual shelter for the unsheltered homeless, and prevent households from ending up on the streets or in shelters.

The CoC is a group of stakeholders and lead organizations in San Joaquin County that receive and distribute funding for supportive homeless and housing services, with several agencies and organizations receiving funding locally within Lodi. Members of the Lodi Committee on Homelessness 893
Annual Action Plan

6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
participate in CoC meetings and volunteer to assist in its homeless prevention and assistance programs/projects. Recently a member was appointed to the CoC Board, which will be a benefit in maintaining a voice for the City at the meetings. Additionally, the Neighborhood Services Manager has held the CoC Shelter Committee Chair position for the past three years and the vice-chair position a year before that.

Previously, the City made a major investment in addressing homelessness and expanding supportive housing by securing over $1.25 million in HEAP funding through the San Joaquin Continuum of Care (CoC). These funds supported the development of Harmony Homes, a tiny home community that provides four permanent supportive housing units. This effort was made possible through close coordination between City staff, consultants, the Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin (HACSJ), and the Lodi Committee on Homelessness as part of the CoC application process.

In addition, the CoC and San Joaquin County have awarded the City four rounds of HHAP funding. These funds have supported both the Harmony Homes and Access Center projects, while also being allocated to subrecipient community partners to provide critical diversion services, including rental and utility assistance, to individuals and families at risk of homelessness.

The City has funded and assisted in the propagation of multiple programs and projects that provide supportive services to homeless individuals, as well as funding programs that support those at risk of being homeless. One of the City’s most prominent resources in assessing and coordinating the needs of homeless populations is the Lodi Committee on Homelessness, a community-based group made up of local stakeholders and representatives of private and public institutions. The Committee on Homelessness works closely with the community to organize local public meetings to address public comments, discuss homeless issues, and find viable programs and solutions to problems facing individuals who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. The Committee also coordinates with the CoC to align the City of Lodi with current countywide goals and standards that address homelessness.

The City will continue to work with the Committee on Homelessness to reach the goals outlined by the CoC, as well as addressing the priority needs of the City’s homeless population.

The City has begun construction of its Access Center, a low barrier shelter to be operated by a local non- profit. This is the culmination of coordination between the City, County and other regional homelessness stakeholders, and the City looks to lead the County with its strategy and facilities. 894
Annual Action Plan

7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS Although the City does not have a large enough population to receive Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds directly, the San Joaquin County Neighborhood Preservation Division administers several federal grant programs that provide direct assistance to homeless and low-income individuals and families throughout San Joaquin County. This includes several supportive housing programs and a Shelter Plus Care program. The Shelter Plus Care program provides rental assistance to homeless individuals with disabilities. Supportive housing programs provide rental assistance and supportive services to families and individuals to assist them in making successful transitions from homelessness to independent living.

Funds for these programs are received through HUD's CoC Homeless Assistance Grant Application process.

Additionally, members of both the Lodi Improvement Committee and the Lodi Committee on Homelessness participated in the development of the CoC’s 2026 Point-in-Time count. This report gives accurate and relevant data on homeless characteristics, supportive housing services, and statistics that help shape the future development of the County’s services and its ability to address the needs of homeless populations. The coordination of these two committees with the CoC is an essential component of the City’s ability to communicate with the CoC to better understand the prioritization of supportive housing needs within the community, based upon the knowledge and data gathered by the committees.

2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction’s consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities
895
Annual Action Plan

8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
1 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of San Joaquin Agency/Group/Organization Type PHA
Services - Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Market Analysis
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff consulted HACSJ on information regarding various program waitlist numbers and family types in San Joaquin County
2 Agency/Group/Organization LOEL Foundation
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Health
Foundation
Neighborhood Organization
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff consulted with the LOEL Foundation regarding the needs of the senior and disabled populations, along with social service characteristics in the community.

LOEL provides 14 units of affordable senior housing as well as social services, activities, and programs. It believes that the top three needs for seniors in Lodi are access to nutrition, affordable housing, and accessible transportation. LOEL's challenges to providing services are mostly centered around a lack of funding and a lack of available space.
896
Annual Action Plan

9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
3 Agency/Group/Organization SALVATION ARMY
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-Children
Services-Elderly Persons
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Services-homeless
Services-Health
Services-Education
Services-Employment
Services - Victims
Neighborhood Organization
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Homelessness Strategy
Anti-poverty Strategy
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff consulted with The Salvation Army about characteristics regarding social service provisions in Lodi. The Salvation Army provides emergency shelter, clothing, meals, case management, substance abuse programs, and multiple other supportive services. It believes that the largest needs in Lodi are centered on increasing the availability of low-income housing, providing more mental health and financial services, and increasing the number of "second chance" programs in the city.
897
Annual Action Plan

10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
4 Agency/Group/Organization SAN JOAQUIN FAIR HOUSING ASSOCIATION Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Service-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Market Analysis
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff sent an email requesting an interview with a representative of the organization; however, a response was not received. The City will continue to consider the San Joaquin Fair Housing as a resource in addressing problems associated with affordable housing, homelessness, and regional planning for equitable public policies and practices
5 Agency/Group/Organization Central Valley Low Income Housing Corp.

Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-homeless
Services-Education
Services-Employment
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Strategy
Anti-poverty Strategy
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff called to schedule an interview with a representative of Central Valley Low Income Housing Corp.; however, a response was not received. The City will continue to consider the organization as a resource in addressing problems associated with housing, low-income, and social service needs in the City. 6 Agency/Group/Organization City of Lodi Improvement Committee Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic Leaders
898
Annual Action Plan

11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Anti-poverty Strategy
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff consulted the Lodi Improvement Committee to gain information on characteristics surrounding the needs of Lodi's youth, disabled, homeless, and senior populations. The committee works to organize and assist in matters regarding varying aspects of the City, including homelessness, development strategies, city funding, and more. The committee identified that some of the largest needs currently in Lodi are increasing youth supportive services, affordable housing for senior, disabled, and low-income populations, and substance abuse programs for homeless individuals.
7 Agency/Group/Organization PREVAIL
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services-Children
Services-Victims of Domestic Violence
Services-homeless
Services - Victims
What section of the Plan was addressed by
Consultation?
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization
was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of
the consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Staff consulted the Women's Center of San Joaquin to gain information on characteristics surrounding San Joaquin County's homeless population, along with characteristics regarding social services offered in the area. The Women's Center offers supportive services to at-risk youth populations and victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking. It identified that some of the largest needs for homeless and youth populations are to increase the number of supportive services offered in San Joaquin County, provide more affordable housing, and increase the provision of education that promotes the prevention of domestic violence and homelessness.
899
Annual Action Plan

12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated

Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City consulted a variety of agencies serving Lodi residents and the region. No agency types were specifically left out of the consultation process.

Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care San Joaquin County
prioritizing efforts that actively move
homeless households into permanent
housing, provide actual shelter for the
unsheltered homeless, and prevent
households from ending up on the streets or
in shelters.

Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts

Narrative (optional)
N/A
900
Annual Action Plan

13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
AP-12 Participation – 91.105, 91.200(c)

1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting

Outreach is essential to the City’s ability to create an accurate and effective plan, and to allocate resources appropriately. First, the City reached out to practitioners, agencies, leaders, and organizations that potentially had the specialized knowledge, experience, resources, and capacity to discuss needs, opportunities, solutions, investments, and improvements to be made. Second, the City encouraged all Lodi residents to weigh in on community needs and opportunities for improvements through numerous opportunities described below (e.g., Lodi Improvement Committee community needs workshop, 30-day public review period, and the City Council public hearing).

Please refer to the table below and the Executive Summary for a list of citizen participation and consultation processes that were completed in preparation of this Annual Action Plan.

Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response/attendance
Summary of
comments received
Summary of comments
not accepted
and reasons
URL (If
applicable)
1 Newspaper Ad Non-
targeted/broad
community
5/2/26-notice of 30-
day comment period
and public hearing to
adopt 26-27 AAP
[tbd] [tbd]
2 Internet Outreach Non-
targeted/broad
community
5/2/26-26-27 AAP
posts on City website
[tbd] [tbd]
`3 Other: Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/broad
community
6/3/26-public hearing
to adopt 26-27 AAP
[tbd] [tbd]
Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach
901
Annual Action Plan

14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
For the 2026–2027 program year, the City will receive $665,263 in CDBG funding. Allocation of these funds and the assignment of funding priorities are guided by the national objectives established in HUD regulations, as well as the local housing and community development goals outlined in the Consolidated Plan. Consi stent with HUD requirements, the City’s local goals emphasize investment in and improvement of lower -income neighborhoods.

The City does not receive CDBG program income and does not anticipate any prior-year resources available for reallocation. Any funding received above the $600,000 allocation will be directed to an existing City project or reserved for a future program year to support a new CDBG-eligible capital project.

Anticipated Resources
Program Source of
Funds
Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount
Available
Remainder
of ConPlan
$
Narrative Description
Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income: $
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$

CDBG PUBLIC-

FEDERAL

ACQUISTION,

ADMIN &

PLANNING,

ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT,

HOUSING, PUBLIC

IMPROVEMENT,

PUBLIC SERVICES
$665,263 0 0 $665,263 $1,300,000 The City of Lodi is an entitlement
community that
expects an average
allocation of $650,000
for planning purposes.

Table 5 - Expected Resources – Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how 902
Annual Action Plan

15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
matching requirements will be satisfied
The CDBG program does not have a matching requirement. However, in evaluating the subrecipient applications and project proposals submitted to the City for CDBG funding each year, match funds are considered as a factor in determining recommended actions.

If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan
The City’s Public Works Department continues to implement alley improvements within the CDBG target area. In addition, the Ci ty of Lodi is partnering with the San Joaquin County Housing Authority to develop a 54-unit affordable housing project for seniors on a surplus parcel owned by the City of Lodi, Seniors at Lodi Commons (Salas Park).

Lodi City CouncilJune 3, 2026

Lodi City Council
June 3, 2026