CITY OF LOMA LINDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Council Chambers
25541 Barton Road
Loma Linda, CA 92354
** Revised **
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Loma Linda is scheduled in the Council Chambers, 25541 Barton Road, Loma Linda, California at at 7:00 p.m. Under Municipal Code Section 2.08.010, study sessions or closed session items may begin at 5:30 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. A recess may be called at the discretion of the City Council.
The Agenda and Reports relating to each agenda item are on file in the City Clerk's Office and are available for public inspection during normal business hours. They are also on the City’s Website at www.lomalinda-ca.gov.
Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office, 25541 Barton Road, Loma Linda, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City’s website at www.lomalinda-ca.gov subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
Persons wishing to speak on an agenda item, including any closed session items, are asked to submit their names in the Kiosk or information card and present to the City Clerk before consideration of the item. When the item is to be considered, the Mayor will recognize you. Please step to the podium, give your name, and offer your comments. The City Council meetings are recorded to assist in preparing the Minutes.
The Oral Reports/Public Participation portion of the agenda pertains to items NOT on the agenda and is limited to 30 minutes; 3 minutes are allotted for each speaker. Under the Brown Act, no action may be taken by the City Council at this time; however, the City Council may refer comments/concerns to staff or request that the item be placed on a future agenda.
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to provide public comment, or for other special assistance; please contact the City at least 48 hours before the meeting to enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. The Office of the City Clerk may be reached at (909) 799-2819 or at [email protected].
1: Call to Order
1A. Call to Order
1B. Roll Call
1C. Closed Session/Workshop
1D. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance
1E. Items to be Added or Deleted
1F. Oral Reports/Public Participation - Non-Agenda Items (Each Speaker limited to 3 minutes. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action or discussion can be taken by City Council) 1G. Conflict of Interest Disclosure
2: Scheduled and Related Items
2A. Information on the Review of Revenue Options and Potential Implementation of a District Tax, the Requirements for Adoption by City Council, and the Timing Associated with Placing the Item on the Ballot [Finance/City Manager] 3: Consent Calendar
3A. Demands Register - April 23, 2024 [Finance]
3B. Approval of Minutes 04-09-2024 [City Clerk]
3C. Reject All Bids for Landscape Maintenance District, Contract "B" [Public Works] — Recommendation to reject the bids for the subject project and direct staff to reevaluate and substantially modify the project
4: Old Business
4A. Council Direction Regarding Drive-through Food Service [City Manager] Continued from April 9, 2024.
5: New Business
6: Reports
6A. Reports of Council Members
6B. Reports Of Officers
7: Adjournment
Date Posted: April 19, 2024
POSTING
I, Lynette Arreola, City Clerk, do hereby certify and declare that, I caused this agenda to be posted at the following three (3) locations, to-wit: 1) Loma Lind a Branch Library, 25581 Barton Road, Loma Linda, California; 2) City Council Chambers, 25541 Barton Road, Loma Linda, California; 3) U. S. Post Office Annex, Newport Avenue, Loma Linda, California
Lynette Arreola, City Clerk
City of Loma Linda, California
City of Loma Linda
Regular City Council Staff Report
Information on the Review of Revenue Options and Potential Implementation of a District Tax, the Requirements for Adoption by City Council, and the Timing Associated with Placing the Item on the Ballot [Finance/City Manager]
Meeting
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Agenda Group
Scheduled and Related Items Item: 2B
To
City Council
From
Sonia Fabela
Via
T Jarb Thaipejr
Attachments
Revenue Budget Ideas Staff Report 4-23-24 -final.pdf
Attachment Revenue Generating Ideas.pdf
Approved/Continued/Denied by City Council
Date:
Please see the attachments for the staff report.
City of Loma Linda
Official Report
Phill Dupper, Mayor
Ronald Dailey, Mayor pro tempore
Rhodes Rigsby, Councilman
Ovidu Popescu, Councilman
Rhoda Spencer-Hwang , Councilwoman
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA:April 23, 2024
TO: City Council
FROM: Sonia Fabela, Finance Director/City Treasurer
VIA: T. Jarb Thaipejr, City Manager
SUBJECT: Information on the review of revenue options and potential implementation of a district tax, the requirements for
adoption by city council and the timing associated with placing the item on the ballot
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:
1. Direct staff to identify potential revenue options such as a Transactions and Use Tax
2. Authorize Staff to work with consultants to assist in the process of polling, public outreach and education
BACKGROUND
As City revenues decline or remain the same, City costs continue to increase due to the rising costs in materials, City services and personnel costs making it difficult to balance the general fund budget. The underlying question during each budgetary cycle is how to maintain the City’s essential City services and the existing quality of life programs while addressing unfunded infrastructure and community-wide improvement projects. We are fortunate that the City of Loma Linda has been fiscally prudent since its inception, with a history of balanced budgets. However, we acknowledge the financial challenges the City faces in the future, such as the increased costs of contractual agreements for services such as the Sheriff Annual Contracts for police services, landscape maintenance costs, and utilities, that continue to increase.
Although staff is conservative by cutting costs where possible, the relocation of one of our major sales tax producers as well as restaurants closing greatly impacts the general fund revenues. The City is experiencing the impact of inflation on our expenses. As each year passes, despite challenges, the City of Loma Linda expects growth in its revenue, however, that growth will be absorbed by the increased costs to provide services to the community. Increasing operational costs will “crowd out” capital Approved/Continued/Denied
By City Council
Date _________________
investments, which will result in further reductions in General Fund Expenditures to balance the budget over the next 3-5 years.
Overhead which currently makes up 9% has been holding steady due to the major projects being built by one-time funds, particularly this fiscal year with the building of the
1.6 MG reservoir. However, fewer projects will be proposed in the coming year further reducing the one-time revenues.
Notwithstanding efforts to reduce General Fund expenditures, a simple analysis of the proposed projects and initiatives highlights the need to explore ways in which the City can increase its revenues and maintain the stability of the General Fund. A balanced mix of revenues contributes to the long-term financial sustainability of the City and allows the City to plan for the future, invest in infrastructure improvements, and address emerging challenges without relying solely on one-time revenues.
As a way to mitigate the fiscal year 2024-2025 and future year anticipated shortfalls, City staff held a public budget workshop on March 13, 2024 to receive revenue generating ideas from Council, the Budget Committee, City employees and the general public. Many ideas were presented as listed in attachment I.
The City Council has explored different revenue-generating approaches to protect Loma Linda future, maintain the defined current standard of service, and ensure a high quality of life for our community.
• These approaches took into consideration economic fluctuations and challenges currently being experienced with inflation and the increased cost of providing services and completing repairs.
• A well-balanced mix of revenue sources helps stabilize Loma Linda’s financial base while enabling the city to provide essential City services. Property Tax
Sales Tax
Transient Occupancy Tax
Business Licenses
Franchise Fees
Licenses and Permits
Other Revenue
• Property taxes are a revenue source for Loma Linda, but relying on them leads to affordability challenges and a lack of equitable sharing amongst our residents and businesses.
• A balanced mix of revenue options contributes to Loma Linda’s long-term financial sustainability. It allows the City to plan for the future, invest in infrastructure improvements, and address emerging challenges without relying solely on short-term fixes.
On April 9, 2024 Council directed staff to research and report back the details associated with establishing a district tax such as a transactions and use tax.
ANALYSIS
A. Transactions and Use Tax
District taxes are taxes imposed under the Transaction and Use Tax Law (Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7251 et seq.) District taxes are voter-approved transactions and use taxes imposed by certain cities, counties and other jurisdictions on the sale of tangible personal property (merchandise). The maximum cumulative sales tax rate allowed by state law is 10.25% with a combined district tax cap of 2% per section 7251.1 of the Revenue and Taxation (R&TC) code.
Transactions and Use Tax differs from local taxes. Local taxes are imposed under the Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law (R&TC section 7201 et seq.) and they are imposed in every city and county in California at a uniform component rate of
1.25%. The collection of sales tax is allocated to the jurisdiction where the sale is made whereas the Transactions and Use Tax is allocated to the jurisdiction where the goods are delivered and placed into use, regardless of the point of sale R&TC 7261, 7202(h)(1).
The City’s local sales tax is at 7.75%, however, the City only receives 1% of that total revenue generated. This year, of the $77.75 million in sales tax revenue generated in the City of Loma Linda, $60 million is expected to be sent to Sacramento and $7.5 million to San Bernardino County and Districts. Of the $77.75 million, only about $10 million is returned to Loma Linda for local control and use. The breakdown for this current rate is as follows:
Jurisdiction Rate .
California State Sales Tax 6.00%
San Bernardino County Special Tax 0.50%
San Bernardino County Sales Tax 0.25%
City of Loma Linda Sales Tax 1.00%
Total Combined Sales Tax 7.75%
A 1% increase will cost an additional .01 cent per $1.00 dollar spent on taxable goods or 10 cents for every $10.00 dollars spent. The sales tax DOES NOT apply to:
• Groceries
• Prescriptions
• Medical services
• Dental services
• Real estate or rent
• Education
• Utilities
• Personal services or labor
•
This revenue measure will include accountability provisions, such as, public disclosure of all spending and annual independent financial audits. It ensures that these funds can be used for essential City services like 911 emergency response, protection of local drinking water, clean and safe public spaces and neighborhoods, and the maintenance of streets & sidewalks while continuing to provide programs and services for our youth and seniors.
B. Tax Measure Process
The City Council does not have the authority to establish or raise taxes, only to put a measure on the ballot for voter consideration. By the City Council placing the measure on the ballot, it will allow for the residents of Loma Linda to best decide the future of the community and generations to come.
Due to Proposition 218, a general tax measure must be consolidated with a General Municipal Election. There is no City General Municipal Election scheduled for November 5, 2024, however, San Bernardino County will hold the Presidential Election on that date. Given that there is no local General Municipal Election on the November 5, 2024, ballot, placing a revenue measure on the ballot proposed by the City will require the declaration of a fiscal emergency. A unanimous vote by the City Council for a declaration of a fiscal emergency will be required to place the revenue measure on the ballot. The declaration would adopt facts and findings in a resolution supporting the fiscal emergency as well as outlining the fiscal impacts to the community over the next two years for the Loma Linda General Municipal Election.
If passed by the City Council and the electorate on the November 5, 2024 election, the tax would be effective no sooner than the first day of the first calendar quarter, commencing more than 110 days after the voters adopted the ordinance. Therefore, the tax would be effective no sooner than April 1, 2025. The City would receive the first advance in June 2025, and the first full fiscal year would be 2025-2026.
C. General Purpose or Specific Purpose
The proposed tax may be for a general purpose or specific purpose.
General Purpose
• General Tax – A city may levy, increase, or extend a transactions and use tax for general governmental purposes at the rate of 0.125% or multiple thereof (limited to a combined district tax cap of 2%) if:
• An ordinance proposing a general tax is approved by a two-thirds vote of all members of that governing body. In this case, it must be a unanimous vote for the following reason.
• Must be consolidated with a general municipal election where the City Council seats are up for election (unless specific emergency criteria are met).
Because the next general election where city council seats are up for election will not take place until 2026, the City Council must make findings that a fiscal emergency requires the tax measure to be added to the ballot in the November 5, 2024 election.
• The tax is approved by a majority vote (50% plus 1 vote) of the qualified voters of the city
Special Purpose
• Special Tax – A city may also levy, increase, or extend a transactions and use tax for specific purposes. The tax may be levied, increased, or extended at a rate of 0.125% or a multiple of (limited to a combined district tax cap of 2%) if:
• An ordinance proposing that tax is approved by a two-thirds vote of all members of that governing body.
• The tax is approved by two-thirds (2/3) vote of the qualified voters of the city voting in an election on the issue.
• The ordinance includes an expenditure plan describing the specific projects for which the revenues from the tax may be expended.
• The measure may be introduced as a special tax in the next general election on November 5, 2024.
Should the Council determine to adopt either a General Purpose or Specific Purpose tax, the following items must be completed by the City Council:
• Adoption of a resolution ordering submission to the qualified electors of the City of a certain measure relating to a transactions and use tax at the general election to be held on November 5, 2024.
• Adoption of a resolution setting priorities for filing written argument(s) and directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis regarding the transactions and use tax measure.
• Resolution providing for the filing of rebuttal arguments for a transactions and use tax measure submitted at the general election on November 5, 2024. • Adoption of an ordinance relating to the proposed tax measure must take place.
The last day to submit these adopted resolutions to the San Bernardino County Elections office is August 9, 2024.
All four listed items must be completed before this deadline.
The City Attorney recommends adoption of the necessary resolutions/ordinances by the second meeting in June 2024, to provide sufficient time for the City Clerk to work with the County to satisfy this deadline.
D. Transactions and Use Tax Revenue Breakdown
Transactions and use tax is allocated based on the location of delivery or first use, not where the sales are negotiated or from where they originate. Currently the City receives sales taxes on transactions that occur inside the City limits, and a portion of the County pool of online sales that is proportionate to the City sales taxes relative to the entire County. The proposed transactions and use tax will allocate additional taxes for purchases from the point of sale to the point of use.
To better illustrate this, examples are shown below:
Example of Taxable Transactions
Existing
Sales Tax
Proposed
Transaction
s and Use
Tax
Warehouse/equipment/construction material sales
negotiated in Loma Linda but then delivered to other
jurisdictions Yes No
Internet Purchases by Loma Linda residents delivered to their residence (i.e., Amazon.com, Target.com,
eBay.com, etc.)
Yes (only
via Countywide pool) Yes
Automobiles purchased by Loma Linda residents from
Loma Linda auto dealerships Yes Yes
Automobiles purchased by Loma Linda residents from
outside the City auto dealerships No Yes
Automobiles purchased by non-resident in Loma Linda
auto dealership Yes No
Walk up stores (gas stations, restaurants and retail
stores) Yes Yes
Point of Sale Business (such as fuel distributor) selling good to customers outside city Yes No
The City sales tax consultant estimates the transactions and sales tax of 1.00% will yield additional estimated revenues of $7,899,000. Of this amount 100% will remain under local control, for local use benfitting the residents of Loma Linda. It can not be take by the the State, County, or other Special District.
The majority of revenue projected is estimated to come from autos/transportation at
30.6% and Business & Industry at 43.7%. As previously shown in the taxable transactions chart, a transactions and use tax will could potentially be collected, if the tax measure passes, from purchases made by Loma Linda residents from auto dealerships outside of Loma Linda as well as from local dealerships. Business and Industry (general merchandise) would also capture a transactions and use tax from internet sales shipped and used in Loma Linda whereas currently Bradley Burnes sales and use tax is allocated to the place where the warehouses are located. Fuel/service stations are estimated to generate 6.8% of the estimated total. The proposed tax is based on the location of use therefore suppliers located in Loma Linda will not be subject to the proposed transactions and use tax for sales that are shipped out of the City boundaries.
E. Cost to City
In 2023, the City of Colton passed a 1.00% transaction and use tax initiative. Colton staff engaged consulting service to manage public outreach, education, social media interactions, and polling. Colton staff has indicated that the cost was approximately $200,000.
The City of Chino had a fiscal emergency ordinance in place for a transaction and use tax on the March ballot. Chino has engaged multiple consultants to manage each portion of their campaign, public outreach, community engagement, and polling.
Chino’s staff have indicated that they estimate the total cost of their campaign to be $318,000 upon final implementation. Chino’s measure did pass with a 60.1% majority vote.
The City of Grand Terrace is also in the process of taking a measure to the voters in the coming November election. They have reported to their Council an estimated cost of about $200,00 based on the examples shown above.
Given the complex nature of educating the public on such a venture and the resources necessary to engage in a professional manner, Staff feels that an approach similar to that of Colton, Chino, and Grand Terrace would be warranted should the Council determine to put a tax measure on the ballot. This would require the City to expend approximately a minimum of $100,000 for consulting services based on staff’s research related to the November 5, 2024 election. In light of the fact that revenues from additional taxes are expected to be in the range of $8M per year in perpetuity, staff feels that this is a reasonable investment with solid rate of return for the investment.
ENVIRONMENTAL
No environmental impact.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approximately $100,000 for consulting services related to the measure.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I – Revenue Generating Ideas from March 13, 2024 Budget Workshop Revenue Generating Ideas
Name Budget Workshop – CC, Budget & Planning Committees, Employees and Public Date 3/13/2024
Revenue
Type Revenue Description Additional Notes
Fees Selling Advertising by using monument signs Have researched options – requires initial investment for sign purchase/construction
Fees EV Charging station Mentioned in meeting -$2k not including installation – can sell at $.35 per kw – pay $.17
per kw
TOT/Fees Allow Airbnbs and collect Transient Occupancy
Tax (TOT)
TOT rate currently 10%/Airbnb not
No business License required since 4 or
more units require a license
Tri-City Drive in Theaters Family owned – in the past, only will lease out Tax Parcel Tax – To offset the limitations that exist
due to restrictions
Requires voter approval
Tax Increase LMD Tax LMD has no escalation for majority of the areas.
This requires voter approval
Tax Transaction Use Tax – Need voter approval Requested research from City Council at April 9, 2024 to be presented at April 23, 2024
Meeting
Tax Utility User Tax (UUT) Voter approved in 1994 and collected revenue in 1994/1995 and 1995/1996. Gov. Code
shows UUT was suspended 7/31/1996
Re-instating requires voter approval
Tax Increase TOT – Currently 10% Voter approval required Fees Collecting fees to allow them to use the tracks –
Requires Park & Rec Dept.
Requires addition of Parks and Recreation
Department – additional staff
Fees Renting the new pickle ball courts Requires addition of Parks and Recreation Department – additional staff
Attachment I
Capitalize on Blue Zone - Federal fundingtransportation grant – rebuilding Designation established by SDA church.
Requires continued research
Engage with non-profit funding More staff needed to research, apply, and report on
Increase Park Use fees – Light fees Requires fee study and increase limited Immediately lift Drive-Thru and alcohol
restrictions
Staff report submitted to Council 4/9/2024
Cannabis Dispensaries Smoking not permitted in Loma Linda, difficult to regulate and not all revenue may be reported
Market the City so that the City is known Marketing costs Have gone live on Instagram and Facebook
as well as informational/marketing videos
on City website
Economic Development consultant to help us
bring in new businesses
Have met with several consultants – currently
working on seeing what options are available
Working with sales tax consultant as well
Work with LLU to update amenities on campus
to generate sales tax
Control costs – explain to citizens that costs
need to be mitigated and services will need to
be cut.
Requires Public education as controlling or
reducing costs means less services available
and reduced project maintenance and
completion
Hire Security company to watch cameras – to
gather data source and try to minimize the use
of the public safety resources
Added costs to City
Outsource services Outsourcing is not always more cost effective Seek HUD Community Funding More staff needed to research, apply, and report on
City of Loma Linda
Regular City Council Staff Report
Demands Register - April 23, 2024 [Finance]
Meeting
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Agenda Group
Consent Calendar Item: 3A
To
City Council
From
Sonia Fabela, Finance Director
Attachments
CC Demands Register 04-23-2024.pdf
Approved/Continued/Denied by City Council
Date:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached list of demands for payment.
City of Loma Linda
Regular City Council Staff Report
Approval of Minutes 04-09-2024 [City Clerk]
Meeting
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Agenda Group
Consent Calendar Item: 3B
To
City Council
From
Lynette Arreola, City Clerk
Attachments
Regular City Council-04-09-2024-minutesDraft.pdf
Approval of Minutes for Regular City Council held on 04-09-2024
1. Call to Order
1A. Call to Order- 7:03 PM
1B. Roll Call- 7:04 PM
Staff Present:
T. Jarb Thaipejr, City Manager
Diane Robbins, City Attorney
Lynette Arreola, City Clerk
Sonia Fabela, Finance Director
Dan Harker, Fire Chief
Nicole Campbell, Associate Planner
Nate Boucher, Battalion Chief
Kyle Mac Gavin, Information Systems Analyst III
Lt. Kaysie Smith, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department 1C. Closed Session - Conference with Labor Negotiator (Government Code Section 54957.6) [Request to move Closed Session item to end of Agenda]- 7:04 PM ** The following document is a draft of the minutes and the not the official approved minutes ** Minutes for the Regular City Council
25541 Barton Road, Loma Linda, CA 92354
April 9, 2024, 7:03 PM - April 9, 2024, 11:19 PM
Roll Call: (The following members were in attendance)
Phillip Dupper, Mayor
Ronald Dailey, Mayor pro tempore
Bhavin Jindal, Councilmember
Ovidiu Popescu, Councilmember
Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, Councilmember
Absent:
John Lenart, Councilmember
Rhodes Rigsby, Councilmember
Agency Representative: City Manager T. Jarb Thaipejr
Employee Organizations: Teamsters (Public Works); Teamsters (Administration); Loma Linda Professional Fire Fighters, Local 935; and Unrepresented Safety (Fire) Management/Confidential Employees.
City Manager Thaipejr recommended moving this item to the end of the Agenda after the newly-elected Council Members are sworn in.
The City Council recessed at 9:19 pm to consider the Closed Session Item as listed and reconvened at 10:02 pm to resume the regular meeting (resume to Agenda Item 5B) with members present except Councilman Rigsby. City Attorney Robbins announced that the City Council met with the Agency's Representative and direction was given to staff.
1D. Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance - Mayor Dupper- 7:04 PM The Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance were led by Mayor Dupper. 1E. Items to be Added or Deleted- 7:05 PM
City Manager Thaipejr removed two items from the Agenda:
1. 2.
1F. Oral Reports/Public Participation - Non-Agenda Items (Each Speaker limited to 3 minutes.
Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action or discussion can be taken by City Council)- 7:05 PM Milford Harrison, the Director of the San Bernardino Valley Regional Water District, offered an update on the region's water supply, assuring that there is sufficient water available for the foreseeable future, provided that conservation efforts are sustained. He invited the Council to attend the San Bernardino Valley Foundations Summit on April 25-26, 2024, and the State Water Project Tour, on May 29-31, 2024.
Todd and Donna Underwood conveyed their gratitude for the efforts of City staff and law enforcement, noting improvements in graffiti removal, increased police patrols, and the reduction in loitering. They noted suspicious activity occurring on a vacant property on First Street; a tent on the sidewalk at Barton Rd. bus stop by Mayberry; trash along the railroad tracks; and a homeless camp behind the storage facility in the Flood Control channel.
Mayor Dupper recommended contacting the authorities regarding any suspicious activity. He also briefly mentioned the Boise Case decision, which ruled that criminalizing camping on public property is considered cruel and unusual punishment when individuals have no alternative legal sleeping options. He mentioned a case being heard this month regarding this matter.
Alex Beltran thanked Councilman Jindal for his four years of service on the City Council. She noted that he rose to the challenge and advocated for young adults, young families, public transit, and for a more climate-friendly environment.
Jose Mejia deferred his comments to Agenda Item 2G.
City Council Agenda Item 2G, Tentative Tract Map No. P22-264 (TTM 20467) and Precise Plan of Design No. P22-266 - A request to demolish a single-family home and develop a single-family residential subdivision, comprised of nine (9) residential lots, one (1) lettered lot, and a new public street, located on Park Ave., west of Curtis St. and east of Coloma St. within the Low-Density Residential (R-1) General Land Use designation and Zoning District (APN: 0283-162-20), to be rescheduled to May 14, 2024; and City Council Agenda Item 3I, Notice of Completion for the Waterline Improvements on Beaumont Ave. (CIP 20-657), to be rescheduled to a future meeting; date currently undetermined.
Susan Montenerno expressed concern about Loma Linda not being as safe as she spoke of her personal experiences in her neighborhood; about traffic safety concerns at the intersection of Park Ave. and Coloma St.; and about the lack of parking being provided to the new housing project proposed on Park Ave. west of Curtis St. and east of Coloma St. She noted that the Mayor and Council have much responsibility for the safety and security of the community. She concluded by expressing her appreciation to the public safety offices.
1G. Conflict of Interest Disclosure- 7:32 PM
No reported conflicts of interest.
2. Scheduled and Related Items
2A. Proclamations- 7:32 PM
Mayor Dupper presented Proclamations for the:
2B. Council Bill #R-2024-11 - March 5, 2024, Election Results [City Clerk]- 7:39 PM Motion by Ronald Dailey, Seconded by Phillip Dupper and motion passing by a vote of 3-0-0-2, John Lenart and Rhodes Rigsby absent, to Adopt Council Bill #R-2024-11.
RESOLUTION NO. 3209
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMA LINDA CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACTS OF THE PRIMARY MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 5, 2024, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
National Day of Prayer - May 2, 2024 - Carolyn J. Perschern accepted the Proclamation, stating that they will have a group of over 30 different churches praying for the community and elected officials.
She invited all to their event on May 2, 2024, at the Double Tree Hotel in Ontario.
The Inland Empire Ronald McDonald House - 2024 Walk for Kids Relay on April 28, 2024 - Marlen Albelbisi accepted the Proclamation, expressing gratitude for the proclamation and noting that the Ronald McDonald Housing will ensure families will have a home away from home when they have a child in the hospital.
One Legacy DMV/Donate Life Month - April 2024 - Katryn Mantz accepted the Proclamation, expressing her appreciation and acknowledgment of Donate Life Month. She noted that she is a mother of 3, but tragically lost her son, Christopher, 6 1/2 years ago. She stated that Loma Linda Children's Hospital made every effort to save him and noted that they hold a special place in her heart. She pointed out that Christopher saved five lives by donating both kidneys, liver, pancreas, and both heart valves and that those five individuals are living their best lives. She thanked the City of Loma Linda for recognizing the amazing gift of organ and tissue donation.
Adopt Council Bill #R-2024-11, Confirming the March 5, 2024, Election Results; Allow remarks from departing Councilmembers;
Administer Oath of Allegiance to newly elected Councilmembers and present Certificates of Election; and
Seat and allow remarks from newly elected Councilmembers.
Councilman Jindal reflected on his path to public service, which commenced during his time in the Cadet Corps in middle school. Since then, he remained dedicated to a life of public service, consistently striving for sustainability and seeking to make a positive impact. He expressed gratitude to key groups and individuals who assisted and supported him during his tenure, including Chief Harker, the Fire Department, City Staff, Lorena Matarrita, Sonia Fabela, Lt. Kaysie Smith, Karen McCulloch, Mayor Dupper and Mayor pro tempore Dailey. He also thank the Fire and City staff for assisting him in reestablishing the Community Garden, a key feature of the City. He commended City Staff, stating that they are the most hardworking and dedicated staff in the County. He also thanked the voters and volunteers who dedicated their time during his campaign. He thanked Mr. Belliard and Ms. Spencer-Hwang for running professional campaigns.
He congratulated Ms. Spencer-Hwang and Mr. Popescu, wishing them success. He affirmed his commitment to remain a humble servant and advocate for the community to build a brighter future.
City Clerk Arreola administered the Oath of Office to Councilmembers-elect Popescu and Spencer-Hwang and presented their respective Certificates of Election.
Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang expressed her gratitude to her family, friends, and the community for their presence and support.
Councilman Popescu stated that he is grateful to call Loma Linda his home and cares deeply for the future of this community. He thanked the Almighty for his blessings and all his Glory; he thanked his family and all who donated their time and money during his campaign and is humbled by the support of the citizens.
He noted that the community is facing issues and unique opportunities. He believes his prior experience as a Councilmember, in the private sector, and community involvement have prepared him for this next chapter. He is ready to work and to build on the successes of the prior Council. He thanked Mr. Jindal and Mr. Lenart for their services as Council.
The new Council Members took their seats on the Dais.
2C. Reorganization- 7:59 PM
Councilman Popescu believed it would be appropriate to continue this item to a Special Meeting on April 16 when they can have a full Council.
Mayor Dupper and Mayor pro tempore Dailey stated they would not be available on April 16.
Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang consented to proceed with what is scheduled on the agenda.
The election of the Mayor was conducted.
Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Phillip Dupper to nominate Phillip Dupper for Mayor.
There were no other nominations. Motion passed by a vote of 3-0-1-1; Ovi Popescu abstained; Rhodes Rigsby absent.
Mayor Dupper expressed his belief that all members of the Council are equal and is proud to work with a City Council that genuinely cares about the City.
The election of Mayor pro tempore was conducted.
Motion by Phillip Dupper to nominate Ronald Dailey for Mayor pro tempore. Mayor Dupper stated that his nomination is based on Mr. Dailey's years of experience and commitment to the Council.
Seconded by Ovi Popescu. There were no other nominations. Motion passed by a vote of 4-0-0-1; Rhodes Rigby absent.
2D. Appoint City Council Members to the Following Boards/Commissions- 8:03 PM Discussion ensued and the following appointments were made:
San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA)
Delegate: Councilman Dailey; Alternate: Councilman Popescu Omnitrans
Delegate: Councilman Dailey; Alternate Councilman Popescu Inland Valley Development Agency (IVDA)
Delegate: Councilman Rigsby and Mayor Dupper; Alternate: Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang San Bernardino International Airport Authority (SBIAA)
Delegate: Councilman Rigsby; Alternate: Mayor Dupper
Solid Waste Management Board
Delegate: Councilman Dupper; Alternate: City Manager Thaipejr California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Board of Directors (CJPIA) Delegate: Councilman Rigsby; Alternate: City Manager Thaipejr Consolidated Fire Agencies JPA Board of Directors (CONFIRE) Delegate: Councilman Dupper; Alternate Councilman Rigsby Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG)
Delegate: Councilman Popescu; Alternate: Mayor pro tempore Dailey Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Ovidiu Popescu, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to Approve the appointments of delegates and alternates as noted. 2E. Accept with regret the resignation of Kurt Swigart from the Budget and Parks, Recreation and Beautification Committees [City Manager]- 8:14 PM
On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Dupper accepted the resignation of Mr. Kurt Swigart from the Budget and Parks, Recreation, and Beautification Committees. He thanked Mr. Swigart for his commitment and dedication serving the City. He said he appreciated his friendship and was sorry to see him go. He presented a plaque to Mr. Swigart.
Mr. Swigart stated that he has lived in Loma Linda for over 34 years and 3 months, and they are now relocating. He noted that it has been a wonderful time and appreciated all the Council has done for the City.
City Manager Thaipejr and Mayor pro tempore Dailey expressed their appreciation to Mr. Swigart for his leadership and commitment to the City.
2F. Environmental Justice Element Presentation [Community Development]- 8:18 PM Associate Planner Campbell explained that Community Development was in the process of adding a new element to the City's General Plan. She noted that Rami & Associates is assisting the City in preparing this Element and that their efforts are funded by SBCTA. She noted that the Attorney General's office has closely been monitoring the City's status of preparing the element.
Mr. Juan Reynoso, Rami & Associates, introduced himself and noted that their agency is partnering with SBCTA to assist agencies in preparing their Environmental Justice (EJ) Element. He pointed out the requirement to have a General Plan, explaining its purpose and essential elements it must incorporate. He went on to explain that the Environmental Justice Element is the newest requirement of the General Plan, noting that this element was the result of SB 1000, the Planning for Healthy Communities Act, which went into effect in 2018 requiring local governments to identify environmental justice communities [called "disadvantaged communities (DAC)"] in their jurisdictions. He reviewed the SB 1000 six Topic Areas to reduce the unique or compounded health risks in DACs: 1) Reduce Pollution Exposure; 2) Promote Food Access; 3) Promote Physical Activity; 4) Promote Public Facilities; 5) Promote Safe and Sanitary Homes; and 6) Promote Civic Engagement. He discussed the three Phases in preparing this element for adoption, which involved a survey that was currently being circulated; in-person and virtual engagement opportunities for community input; study sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council; and the hearings for adoption by the City Council. He commended Loma Linda Staff for being proactive in commencing this process and taking advantage of this opportunity of the free technical assistance offered by SBCTA. He noted that Loma Linda is the only jurisdiction currently taking advantage of this free service and avoiding conflicts with the Attorney General's office by showing a concerted effort to complete this process.
Mayor Dupper expressed concern that the survey had been distributed without Council's knowledge. He preferred presenting such items to the Council for review before circulation so they have prior knowledge.
In response to questions, Mr. Reynoso noted that the survey would remain open until May 31, 2024; that they would actively work with staff and continue public outreach efforts; that he anticipated the study sessions with City Council would be in late summer or early fall to review the preliminary engagement feedback and brainstorm ideas for additional policies and goals for the general plan; and that they will keep Council updated throughout the process.
Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang asked about the survey's methodology, including whether any incentives were being offered, how the online-only format might limit the demographic, and the number of focus groups involved. She also requested that the Council have the opportunity to review the facilitation guide and would assist in promoting the survey.
Associate Planner Campbell stated that they had stopped the survey circulation after two weeks in order to present to City Council. Currently, they have received 30 responses. She also noted plans to advertise the survey across the city with posters and make it available in hard copy.
Mr. Reynoso stated that they have not yet determined the number of focus groups, but are looking at various options. They would welcome City Council's assistance in spreading the word.
Todd Underwood registered to speak but was not present. 2G. Public Hearing - Tentative Tract Map No. P22-264 (TTM 20467) and Precise Plan of Design No. P22-266 - a request to demolish a single-family home and develop a single-family residential subdivision, comprised of nine (9) residential lots, one (1) lettered lot, and a new public street. The site is located on Park Avenue, west of Curtis Street and east of Coloma Street, within the Low Density Residential (R-1) General Land Use designation and Zoning District. (APN:0283-162-20) [Community Development]- 8:54 PM Public Hearing was opened at 8:46 PM and closed at 8:54 PM Mayor Dupper reminded the Council that this item is being rescheduled to May 14, 2024, at the request of the City Manager; however, since the item was advertised as a public hearing for this meeting, he will open the public hearing for public comment.
The public hearing was opened.
Jose Mejia noted that his property is directly across the street from the development, and his property will face the street. He expressed concern about the added traffic this will generate and the insufficient parking. The development is on a cul-de-sac, but he would like to see a second street access into this subdivision, possibly from Redlands Blvd. He pointed out that a petition was submitted to the City from residents who have concerns with parking and traffic.
Mayor Dupper explained that cities are facing a challenge with new State requirements that do not allow a City to deny a project based on parking and traffic issues. That discretion is being taken away from local governments.
City Manager Thaipejr noted that the developer does not own the property behind the development to provide access from Redlands Blvd.
The public hearing was closed.
Motion by Ovidiu Popescu, seconded by Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to Continue this item to May 14, 2024.
3. Consent Calendar
Mayor Dupper reminded the Council that Agenda Item 3I was pulled off the agenda.
Councilman Popescu requested to pull Agenda Item 3E.
City Manager Thaipejr explained that this is a reclassification of the Information Systems Analyst III position in both title and salary to Information Systems Manager and updated the salary schedule to reflect this change. He noted that the individual has been managing the Loma Linda Connected Communities program and the Information Systems Department.
Councilman Popescu expressed concern that the Council will be discussing later on the agenda budgetary issues that he doesn't feel comfortable approving this promotion at this stage. He said it may be something that can be revisited at a later time.
City Manager Thaipejr stated that the City's IT consultant moved to another position outside the City. He noted of the highly competitive market, making it challenging for the City to recruit a replacement. He stated that the City has the budget to fund this position and added that he is not filling three positions for available funding.
Mayor Dupper stated that he spoke with someone who was upset the LL Connected Communities service went down, but complimented the City for the customer service the LL Connected Communities provides.
Discussion resumed on Agenda Item 3I.
Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Ovidiu Popescu, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to Approve the Consent Calendar as submitted with the exception of Agenda Item 3E, which was voted on separately, and exception to Agenda Item 3I, which was removed from the agenda. 3A. Demands Registers - March 26 and April 9, 2024 [Finance]- 8:55 PM Approved the Demands Registers dated:
3B. Approval of Minutes 02-13-2024 [City Clerk]- 8:55 PM Minutes of February 13, 2024, were approved as submitted. 3C. Treasurer's Report - March 2024 [Finance]- 8:55 PM
Accepted the Treasurer's Report for March 2024 for filing. 3D. Fire Department's Activity Report - March 2024 [Fire]- 8:55 PM Accepted the Fire Department's Activity Report for March 2024 for filing. 3E. Council Bill #R-2024-12 - A Resolution to Amend the City Classification Plan and Salary Schedule [Human Resources] - 8:55 PM
Councilman Popescu stated that he would like to see more data and doesn't understand why the City cannot find an additional person for the IT Department.
Mayor Dupper supported the request for more data as requested by Councilman Popescu; however, he noted that it is a struggle for local government, in these current times, to hire. He supported retaining valuable employees who contribute to the city's operations.
City Manager Thaipejr expressed concern if this individual were to leave the city. Councilwoman SpencerHwang asked questions about the job responsibility change.
Kyle MacGavin, Information Systems Analyst III, stated that he has been with the City for 9 years. Since his Director left the City, he assumed all the IT Director duties including managing the Loma Linda Connected Communities Program (LLCCP) under his current job classification. He noted that he has 9 years of March 26, 2024, with commercial demands totaling $1,118,390.82, and Payroll dated March 14, 2024, totaling $372,003.50; and
April 9, 2024, with commercial demands totaling $3,015,651.16, and Payroll dated March 28, 2024, totaling $368,642.43.
institutional knowledge, is thoroughly familiar with all configurations of the City's IT system, and personally knows all his LLCCP customers. Discussion ensued and the vote was taken.
Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Phillip Dupper and passing by a vote of 3-1-0-1; Opposed by Ovidiu Popescu; Absent was Rhodes Rigsby to Approve and Adopt Council Bill #R2024-12.
RESOLUTION NO. 3210
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMA LINDA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY CLASSIFICATION PLAN AND SALARY SCHEDULE.
3F. Council Bill #R-2024-13 - A Resolution to Approve Tract Map No. 20417, Lennar Homes [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Adopted Council Bill #R-2024-13
RESOLUTION NO. 3211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMA LINDA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP 20417 (North Side of Mission Road, East of SCE Easement)
3G. Council Bill #R-2024-14 - A Resolution to Approve Tract Map No. 20442, Lennar Homes [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Adopted Council Bill #R-2024-14.
RESOLUTION NO. 3212
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMA LINDA, APPROVING FINAL TRACT MAP 20442 (Northwest Corner of Citrus Avenue and Bryn Mawr Avenue) 3H. Council Bill #R-2024-15 - A Resolution Approving SB 1 Project List for Fiscal Year 2024/25 [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Adopted Council Bill #R-2024-15.
RESOLUTION NO. 3213
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 3174 3I. Notice of Completion for the Waterline Improvements on Beaumont Avenue (CIP 20-657) [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
City Manager Thaipejr removed the item from the agenda to be rescheduled to a future date; no action taken.
3J. Notice of Completion of Installation for the Waterline Installation at Campus St. (CIP 23- 667) [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Accepted this project as complete and authorized recordation of the Notice of Completion. 3K. Notice of Completion of Installation of Ceramic Tile Mural at Leonard Bailey Park [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Accepted this project as complete and authorized recordation of the Notice of Completion. 3L. Notice of Completion for Installation of Electrical Wiring for New Generator (CIP 21-858) [Public Works]- 8:55 PM
Accepted as complete and authorized recordation of the Notice of Completion.
4. Old Business
4A. Council Bill #O-2024-03 - (Second Reading) Ordinance Modifying Water Rates and Repealing Ordinance No. 754 [Public Works]- 9:12 PM
City Manager Thaipejr presented a summary of the Water Rate Study stating that the proposed increases are to cover City costs for the next five years; that the increase is for water only, not sewer; that notices were mailed out to all residents and that the City received four letters opposed to the increase.
Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Ovidiu Popescu, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to Adopt Council Bill #O-2024-03, Waive the reading in its entirety and read by total only ORDINANCE NO. 780 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOMA LINDA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE WATER RATES EFFECTIVE JUNE 1, 2024, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 754
5. New Business
5A. Remove Mr. Heath Nicola from the Traffic Advisory Committee and replace with Mr. Art Walls and other Board and Committee Vacancies [City Manager]- 9:18 PM City Manager Thaipejr stated that due to multiple meeting absences by member Heath Nicola, the Traffic Advisory Committee recommended removing member Heath Nicola and appointing Art Walls as his replacement. He noted that Art Walls had been a committee member for almost 20 years, but resigned for a short period. Recommend to declare vacancies for the Boards and Committees identified in the report and authorize to post a notice of the vacancies.
Motion by Ovidiu Popescu, seconded by Phillip Dupper, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
Art Walls to the Traffic Advisory Committee and remove Mr. Heath Nicola from the Traffic Advisory Committee due to meeting absences; To Declare vacancies due to member term expirations of the Budget Committee, Parks, Recreation and Beautification Committee, Traffic Advisory Committee, and Trails Development Committee as noted in the report; and authorized vacancy notice be posted. 5B. Council Direction Regarding Revenue Enhancement Taxation [City Manager]- 10:02 PM The City Council recessed at 9:19 pm to the Closed Session - Conference with Labor Negotiator (Government Code Section 54957.6), reconvened at 10:02 pm and resumed to Agenda Item 5B.
City Manager Thaipejr mentioned that the City hosted a budget workshop on March 13, 2024, to discuss the City's budget and gather input for revenue-generating suggestions. While there were good suggestions that the City will follow up on, he noted that the revenue might not be significant. He explored the option of a sales tax increase, which could provide substantial revenue to support the city's operations. That option would require a general election vote. He also discussed the potential for increasing other taxes like a utility tax, TOT, etc. To move forward, he requested direction from Council to hire a consultant to conduct a study and assist the City in the process of placing a ballot measure in November to increase the sales tax. If it is not done this year, the City would have to wait until 2026.
Mayor Dupper recalled that the discussion at the workshop focused specifically on a potential sales tax increase to go on the ballot in November. He stated that while the City may have a balanced budget this year, the future projection of the City's budget is in a critical position. The City also lost some taxgenerated businesses. That information was confirmed by the Budget Committee. He noted that Loma Linda has never had a sales tax increase. If it doesn't go on the ballot this year, they would have to wait until 2026.
City Manager Thaipejr stated that a one percent sales tax increase would generate approximately $7 - 7.5 million a year for the City, but would take a year to see the revenue.
Councilman Popescu stated that this is a huge issue that will impact the City for years and hasn't seen the budget to understand the City's current situation. He would need to see more budget data, why the revenues have gone down, and review some of the revenue options discussed at the workshop before he can make any decision. He noted that it is an important issue and should be discussed by a full Council.
Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang stated that she met with the City Manager and obtained and reviewed the budget from 2019 to the present. She stated that it is concerning to see the City's position with the budget. She believed the City must act quickly to preserve the quality of life that the community enjoys.
While she doesn't particularly favor raising taxes, considering the city's projected budget and the rising cost of living, she noted that they need to explore multiple strategies. First would involve implementing a tax, second, she suggested establishing a Revenue Generating Committee. She conducts studies related to the Blue Zone and hosts visitors and media who come to Loma Linda to learn about it. She suggested the City capitalize on these opportunities to generate revenue. She also suggested looking at the cost of services.
Mayor Dupper stated that he spoke with the owner of the Stater Bros shopping center inquiring about his thoughts on a tax increase and the codes on drive-throughs. The owner informed him of three businesses (Dutch Bros., Chipotle, and Starbucks) that were interested in the vacant building that used to be the bookstore on their lot, but later was told it was not a good fit for their business. The owner of Stater Bros. informed him that public safety is his big concern and that it will affect his business if the city cannot afford adequate public safety. He also noted that he spoke at the Chamber breakfast and shared this information. He didn't get any pushback from the business present. They have to look at how to make a business successful. He noted to Council that they are not voting on increasing the taxes, they are voting to put a measure on the ballot for the community to decide.
Karen M., Chamber of Commerce, stated that businesses would not be against a tax increase, because they understand it costs to do business in the City. If businesses understand what is at stake they wouldn't be opposed.
City Attorney Robbins stated that the City is requesting direction on whether the Council wants to look into what would be involved and the time to do that.
Discussion ensued on marketing the data and educating the public in this process. Mayor Dupper noted that other cities, such as Grand Terrace and Yucaipa are working on a sales tax increase measure that the City can reach out to.
Council Popescu stated that there are professionals who will handle this properly because if it is not done correctly, everything can be overturned. He noted that there is a statewide ballot in the November election that will reverse anything. He noted that it needs to be pursued in a way that may overcome those barriers. It must focus specifically on what the City wants it to fund.
Mayor Dupper concurred with Councilman Popescu regarding the ballot measure. Mayor Dupper noted when he leave his career that his goal on the Council when he finish out his carreer his goal is to leave the city as best as he can.
Motion by Ronald Dailey, seconded by Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, and passing by a vote of 3-1-0-1 Opposed by Ovidiu Popescu Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to direct staff to begin exploring the timetable, collecting data, and developing a strategic plan for a sales tax increase
5C. Council Direction Regarding Drive-through Food Service [City Manager]- 10:46 PM City Manager Thaipejr is requesting direction from the City Council to consider repealing the Ordinance regarding the restriction on drive-through food service.
Councilman Popescu stated that this is an important issue and that he would prefer to continue the discussion until they have a full Council. He noted that this ban was a major issue for many people who emphasized keeping Loma Linda a healthy city. He stated that they need to inform those who attended that meeting that the City Council is discussing this matter again.
Mayor Dupper recalled the discussion, recollecting that the ban on drive-throughs was a compromise made when approving McDonald's. He pointed out the significant changes brought about by Covid in the way businesses operate. While there are businesses and restaurants that would fit Loma Linda's model, the drive-through restrictions deter those viable businesses.
Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang stated that she is okay with revisiting this matter. She said that it was her colleagues who came to the meeting, but admitted going through their drive-through for fries. She pointed out the irony of having three smoke shops in the City while there are concerns about a fast-food establishment. She stated that they should look at the bigger picture, suggesting that certain food establishments could be a good fit for Loma Linda. She noted that they have to be strategic, because she is not okay with just any food establishment. It should align with the community and send the right message.
Mayor Dupper called for a vote on the matter. However, the item failed due to lack of a motion. 5D. Council Direction to discuss permitting emotional support dogs for the Fire Department10:58 PM Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang distributed a packet of information, mentioning that she had requested to include this item on the agenda. She began by stating her expertise in epidemiology. During a ride-along with the Fire Department, there was a discussion about a therapy dog. The packet contained studies demonstrating that firefighters regularly experience stress, trauma, and depression. More than half of them suffer from severe stress. If not managed properly, these issues will escalate, leading to extended stress leave and requiring other staff to cover for the affected employee. One strategy is the use of therapy animals. Studies show that petting a dog for 10 minutes relieves stress levels. Even though the City provides the Employee Assistance Program (EAP), only a very small percentage will use that service.
In her work where she interviews individuals over the age of 100 years, she found that most of them have pets.
She outlined the cost of a therapy dog, which would entail a one-time upfront fee of $8,000 for the first year, covering expenses such as pet certification, food, and veterinary care. Following, the costs would be $2,000 annually which includes food and care. She noted the cost for one firefighter to be out on stress leave for three days with other staff covering the affected employee at the time and one-half can equal the annual cost of the therapy dog. She noted that the duration of stress leave taken by an employee is usually more than three days, it can be months. She emphasized the need to begin investing in prevention. It will save the City in the long run. Studies show therapy dogs work. There is an organization nearby that can assist in this process. The Union supports this.
Firefighter Nick Hernandez pointed out that the El Cajon Fire Department fostered this program and that the City can piggy-back on this program that has already been established.
Battalion Chief Nate Boucher spoke on behavioral health issues the City has experienced with fire employees who are out for months at a time regularly. During his research, they discovered agencies that had multiple therapy animals, which would be problematic for the City. They also discovered other stations that had a facility/therapy dog that served the station and helped mitigate these health concerns. They looked further into the therapy dog program at the City of El Cajon and how the training program is customized to meet the specific needs of the Fire Department. It has been a successful program. They can piggyback on this program. This will be in the Fire Station 365 days/yr.
Mayor Dupper looked at the podcast that was shared by Councilwoman Spencer-Hwang, and he supports the idea of a therapy dog.. He spoke with the Fire Chief in El Cajon regarding their program. The Fire Chief explained the process to develop this program and shared their policy. He said it was informational. One thing is they have to be careful in choosing the correct breed of dog.
Chief Harker stated that he supports the therapy dog. He said that years ago mental health was not a big topic, but is discussed more now. He is an advocate for mental health. He thinks this is a good idea. They will work closely with Risk Management to develop a plan for allowing a therapy dog and present it to Council for review.
Motion by Ovidiu Popescu, seconded by Rhonda Spencer-Hwang, and passing by a vote of 4-0-0-1 Absent was Rhodes Rigsby
to report back to Council with more information on a therapy dog program on May 14, 2024.
6. Reports
6A. Reports of Council Members- 11:17 PM
Mayor Dupper reported on the City Council's difficult decision to close the pedestrian bridge at a previous meeting. Since then, he noted that the City has had to install a secured fence three times, because it had been torn down each time. He noted the City will be installing a wrought iron fence. He pointed out that this is evidence of criminal activity.
6B. Reports Of Officers- 11:19 PM
No reports.
7. Adjournment
City of Loma Linda
Regular City Council Staff Report
Reject All Bids for Landscape Maintenance District, Contract "B" [Public Works] Meeting
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Agenda Group
Consent Calendar Item: 3C
To
City Council
From
Jeff Peterson, Associate Engineer
Via
T Jarb Thaipejr, City Manager
Approved/Continued/Denied by City Council
Date:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council reject the bids for the subject project and direct staff to reevaluate and substantially modify the project.
BACKGROUND:
When City Council approves the annual FY 24/25 budget it will include items for maintenance of the Landscape Maintenance District.
ANALYSIS:
Two bids were received and publicly opened on April 9, 2024. The bids were $361,870.00 (Golden West Landscape) and $366,009.58 (Orozco Landscape and Tree), as shown in the attached bid summary. These bids far exceed the projected budget amount of $191,000.00. Staff will carefully analyze the bids and determine changes to the scope of the project to bring bids within the budgeted amount. As this item is for the next fiscal year, urgency is not perceived at this time.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost to evaluate and modify the project is minimal.
Attachments
LMD 04 Contract B.pdf
Zone Map 2024.pdf
CITY OF LOMA LINDA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
CONTRACT B
BID OPENING DATE: April 9, 2024
Contract A Golden West Landscape Orozco Landscape & Tree ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QNTY COST PER YEAR COST PER YEAR 1 Total annexations Annual Total 361,870.00 366,009.58
Total $361,870.00 $366,009.58
City of Loma Linda
Regular City Council Staff Report
Council Direction Regarding Drive-through Food Service [City Manager] Continued from April 9, 2024.
Meeting
Tuesday, April 23, 2024, 8:47 AM
Agenda Group
Old Business Item: 4A
From
T Jarb Thaipejr, City Manager
Approved/Continued/Denied by City Council
Date:
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that City Council provide direction regarding drive-through food service.
BACKGROUND:
In 2013, City Council adopted an ordinance to regulate and prohibit fast-food restaurants with drive-through services in the city.
ANALYSIS:
Currently, there are eight drive-through restaurants in our city. Despite the prohibition, fast-food establishments with drivethrough services continue to express interest in locating within our city, including Dunkin' Donuts, Dutch Bros Coffee, Jack in the Box, and Chipotle. It is evident that Loma Linda meets their business profile needs and demographic preferences, suggesting a conducive environment for successful operations.
Although Loma Linda has a relatively small population of 25,000 residents, its daytime population grows to 70,000 commuters that frequent the University and other medical-related intuitions. Discussions during the recent budget workshop on March 13 highlighted the need for drive-through facilities to accommodate these commuters and to generate revenue for the city.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
Not applicable.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
This discussion and review has no impact upon current revenue or expenditure levels. It should be noted, however, that the eight (8) fast food restaurants with a drive-through generated approximately $10,000.00 per year in sales tax revenue. The 29 sit-in restaurants without drive-through service generate approximately $6,200.00 per year.