TO: City Council
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2023
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for Traffic Calming Toolkit
RECOMMENDATION
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for Traffic Calming Toolkit in the amount of $77,040.00 plus a 10% contingency amount of $7,704.00; and authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
BACKGROUND
In February 2023, the City requested proposals for a Traffic Calming Toolkit to manage traffic flow throughout the City’s many local streets. City staff, through its Technical Traffic Advisory Committee, receive complaints of speeding traffic on various streets throughout the City, concerns of long wait times to safely make turns at uncontrolled intersections and crossing at pedestrian crosswalks. The purpose of this project is to have a toolkit to reduce the speed of traffic, provide safer environments for pedestrians, while taking aesthetics of devices into account.
Approaches used in the past to address concerns include education of motorists, enhanced enforcement, and engineering applications. The City would like to enhance its available tools based upon new solutions, and general guidelines based upon various streets configurations. The toolkit will inform future construction projects as well as provide solutions to be applied in the near-term.
The City received six proposals in March 2023 for this project and interviewed four firms in April. The City selected Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. based upon their qualifications, proposal, and interview. The project team will review historic records of Traffic Investigation Requests from community members, collision information, and hold two community workshops in conjunction with the Public Safety and Traffic Commission 1 Item No. 7h
CITY OF LOMITA
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
2 to solicit input. The project is scheduled to be completed in the Fall of 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT
This project has been budgeted as a Capital Project, 311-810-5806.373, and funding is sufficient for this contract.
OPTIONS
1. Approve staff’s recommendation.
2. Provide alternative direction.
ATTACHMENTS
Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Reviewed by: Approved by:
Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:
_______________________
Carla Dillon, P.E.
Public Works Director
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF LOMITA AND KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
This AGREEMENT for Traffic Calming Toolkit is entered into this 2 nd day of May 2023,
by and between the CITY OF LOMITA, a general law city and municipal corporation (“CITY”) and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (“CONTRACTOR”).
R E C I T A L S
A. CITY does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement.
B. Therefore, CITY desires to contract out for Traffic Calming Toolkit.
C. CONTRACTOR warrants to CITY that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.
D. CITY desires to contract with CONTRACTOR to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:
1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION.
A. As partial consideration, CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as Exhibit A;
B. As an additional consideration, CONTRACTOR and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement.
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR an amount not to exceed $ 84,744 for CONTRACTOR’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR agrees, however, that the proposed cost of the services under this AGREEMENT is $77,040. If CONTRACTOR incurs expenses exceeding the proposed cost of $77,040, such amounts shall require written authorization by City Staff in order for CONTRACTOR to receive compensation for those costs.
D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his designee.
Attachment No. 1
E. CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its bill for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR all uncontested amounts set forth in the CONTRACTOR'S bill within 30 days after it is received.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONTRACTOR will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICES attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
If any part of Exhibit A is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONTRACTOR will, in a professional manner, furnish all the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONTRACTOR by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONTRACTOR as specified by this Agreement, CONTRACTOR must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period.
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by CITY.
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that CONTRACTOR has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.
6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONTRACTOR’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is Laura Forinash. CONTRACTOR shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of CITY.
7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on May 2, 2024, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 13 of this Agreement or extended in writing in advance by both parties.
8. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TRAINING. The contractor shall implement and maintain activity specific Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent pollutant
loading from stormwater and non-stormwater discharges to receiving waters as required in Municipal NPDES Permit No. CAS004004. Contracting staff whose primary job duties are related to implementation of BMPs shall be adequately trained to effectively implement, operate, and maintain such BMPs and must be versed in factors affecting BMP effectiveness. The contractor shall certify they have received all applicable training to implement the requirements in Municipal NPDES Permit No.
CAS004004 and shall provide documentation to that effect.
9. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum, and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONTRACTOR and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with the written agreement between the parties.
10. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONTRACTOR will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number.
11. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required by local, state, and federal laws in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement, including a business license as specified in Title VI, Chapter 2 of the Lomita Municipal Code.
12. LAWS AND REGULATIONS; EMPLOYEE/LABOR CERTIFICATION.
CONTRACTOR shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. CONTRACTOR shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Services and this Agreement. All violations of such laws and regulations shall be grounds for CITY to terminate the Agreement for cause.
13. PREVAILING WAGE.
A. Prevailing Wage. CONTRACTOR is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONTRACTOR agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.
Upon request, CITY shall provide CONTRACTOR with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the CONTRACTOR’S principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to
effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and CONTRACTOR shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law.
CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
B. Registration/DIR Compliance. If the services are being performed on a public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). CONTRACTOR shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subcontractors. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractors that affect CONTRACTOR’S performance of services, including any delay, shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered CONTRACTOR caused delay and shall not be compensable by CITY.
CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor.
C. Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
D. Employment of Apprentices. CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors shall comply with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
E. CONTRACTOR or subcontractors may not perform work on a public works project with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform work on a public project pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.1 or 1777.7. Any contract on a public works project entered into between the CONTRACTOR and a debarred subcontractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred subcontractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a subcontractor on a public works contract. Any public money that is paid or may have been paid to a debarred subcontractor by CONTRACTOR on the project shall be returned to CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible
for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subcontractor who has been allowed to work on the Project.
F. CONTRACTOR agrees to bind every subcontractor to the terms of the Agreement as far as such terms are applicable to subcontractor’s portion of the work.
CONTRACTOR shall be as fully responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by its subcontractor, as CONTRACTOR is for acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONTRACTOR. Nothing contained in these Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and CITY.
14. TERMINATION.
A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.
B. CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date.
C. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONTRACTOR shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONTRACTOR will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.
D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.
15. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent arising out of, pertaining to or relating to CONTRACTOR's negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation.
CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR as required by Section 19, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification.
16. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONTRACTOR’s professional services.
CONTRACTOR’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
17. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that THE CONTRACTOR will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which it is performed. THE CONTRACTOR will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employees while under contract with CITY. CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONTRACTOR as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONTRACTOR will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.
18. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. THE CONTRACTOR agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement.
B. CONTRACTOR will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
19. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONTRACTOR will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by CITY to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONTRACTOR to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
20. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. CONTRACTOR, at CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:
1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. CONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONTRACTOR for CITY.
2. General Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.
3. Automobile Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
4. Professional Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from CONTRACTOR’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by CONTRACTOR or by its employees, subcontractors, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONTRACTOR will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated.
Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONTRACTOR for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONTRACTOR, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.
B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by CITY, and shall be endorsed as
follows. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise.
1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.”
2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Any insurance maintained by CITY, including any self-insured retention CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy.
3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.
5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by CITY.
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement.
CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.
D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. At CITY’s option, CONTRACTOR shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
E. CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.
Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement.
F. Failure on the part of CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain the required
insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 13 above.
G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’S behalf upon CONTRACTOR’S failure or refusal to do so to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against Contractor for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach.
21. USE OF OTHER CONTRACTORS. THE CONTRACTOR must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any Contractors while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed Contractor and the terms of compensation.
22. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONTRACTOR for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONTRACTOR’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents.
23. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONTRACTOR shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during the CITY’S review of CONTRACTOR’S report or plans. Should the CONTRACTOR fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to CONTRACTOR. In addition to all other available remedies, CITY may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by CITY or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONTRACTOR under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction.
24. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONTRACTOR by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONTRACTOR’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONTRACTOR’S only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.
25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY CONTRACTOR
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
ATTN: City Manager
Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc.
245 E. 3rd St.
Long Beach, CA 90802
ATTN: Sri Chakravarthy
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section.
26. SOLICITATION. CONTRACTOR maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONTRACTOR breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONTRACTOR and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of the CONTRACTOR’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.
28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.
29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.
30. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.
31. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city administrator, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.
32. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission, scanned and delivered via electronic mail, or delivered using digital signature technology approved by CITY. Such facsimile or electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
33. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other.
34. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided.
35. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.
36. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY.
CONTRACTOR represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private Contractors, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONTRACTOR is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency.
37. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (CITY and CONTRACTOR initials required at one of the following paragraphs)
By their respective initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is a “contractor” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were CONTRACTOR employed by CITY. CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledges his or her assumingoffice, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to the Contractor commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to CONTRACTOR a memorandum detailing the extent of CONTRACTOR’S disclosure obligations in accordance with the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
OR
By their initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is not a “contractor” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of contractor in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
[signatures on following page]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF LOMITA CONTRACTOR
Ryan Smoot, City Manager By: Sri Chakravarthy, Vice President ATTEST:
xx-xxxxxx
Kathleen Horn Gregory, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Trevor Rusin, City Attorney
CITY OF LOMITA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
Traffic Calming Toolkit
RFP DEADLINE
MARCH 16, 2023
1:00 P.M.
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION I
GENERAL
INFORMATION.......................................................................................................................................3
SECTION II
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................................6
SECTION III
SCOPE OF SERVICES.........................................................................................................................11
SECTION IV
SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS .......................................................................................................14 Attachment A – General City Map
Attachment B – Professional Services Agreement (Sample) 3 SECTION I
GENERAL INFORMATION
A. INTRODUCTION / BACKGROUND
The City of Lomita is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced Civil Engineering firm(s) to prepare a Traffic Calming Toolkit specific to Lomita.
The City of Lomita is an urban, densely populated 1.97 square miles (total area is 1,261 acres), located at the base of the Palos Verdes Peninsula in the Los Angeles Basin, Los Angeles County. The City of Lomita is located in the southwestern part of Los Angeles County, 26 miles south of downtown Los Angeles and bounded by the City of Torrance on the north and west, the Harbor Region of Los Angeles to the east, and the City of Rolling Hill Estates on the southwest; and the City of Rancho Palos Verdes and unincorporated Los Angeles County area to the southeast. The City is almost completely developed with mostly residential neighborhoods and commercial units.
The City of Lomita is in need of a Traffic Calming Toolkit to manage traffic flow throughout the City’s many local streets. The City is served by east-west principal arterial corridors Pacific Coast Highway (under CalTrans jurisdiction) and Lomita Boulevard. These are the only two streets that allow vehicular traffic through on the western boundary of the City. The north-south streets include minor arterials, Eshelman Avenue and Narbonne Avenue, among others. These have residential frontages as well as schools and Lomita downtown, all with pedestrian traffic. City staff, through its Technical Traffic Advisory Committee, receive complaints of speeding traffic on various streets throughout the City, concerns of long wait times to safely make turns at uncontrolled intersections and crossing at pedestrian crosswalks.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This RFP is to solicit proposals for engineering services to complete a toolkit for traffic calming specific for the City of Lomita. The purpose of this project is to have a toolkit to reduce the speed of traffic, provide safer environments for pedestrians, and taking aesthetics of measures into account.
The City’s Technical Traffic Advisory Committee is composed of City staff from Public Works and Parking Enforcement as well as its Traffic Advisor from Los Angeles County and the Sheriff Department representatives. Approaches used in the past to address concerns include education of motorists, enhanced enforcement, and engineering applications. The City would like to enhance its 4 available tools based upon new solutions, and general guidelines based upon various streets configurations.
The Scope of Work (Section III) is a minimum suggested scope for the work of the project.
C. DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The City of Lomita is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced Civil Engineering firm(s) to prepare a traffic calming toolkit to meet the needs of the City. This work will involve project management, research, review of information, community workshops, development of a comprehensive traffic calming toolkit, preparation of reports/documents, and presentations. Details are included in Section III, Scope of Services.
The contract will be regulated according to the provisions of all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances that are applicable. This includes compliance with prevailing wage rates and their payment in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1775.
F. PROJECT DURATION
The estimated time to complete this project is four (4) to five (5) months.
G. PROJECT SCHEDULE
A tentative schedule is included below. The proposals submitted shall use this schedule as a guide to further define an appropriate work schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services in Section III. The final schedule will be negotiated based on the final scope of work and work plan agreed to by the City and the selected consultant.
Milestone Date
RFP Release February 23, 2023
Last Day for Questions March 8, 2023
Proposal Deadline March 16, 2023
Consultant Interviews March 28, 2023
Expected City Council Approval April 18, 2023
Kick-off & Notice to Proceed April 25, 2023
*Dates are estimates
5 SECTION II
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
A. GENERAL
The proposal must be concise, well organized and should demonstrate your firm’s team qualifications and experience related to this project. The proposal shall be printed on 8½" x 11" pages and include resumes, past experience, graphs, tables, etc. It must include the following:
I. Cover Letter (one page): Provide a one-page cover letter, which includes the firm name, name, address, and telephone number of the person(s) to be used for contact who will be authorized to make presentations for the firm. The cover letter must bear the signature of the person authorized to sign on behalf of the proposer and to bind the applicant in a contract. The cover letter will include a statement offering the proposer's acceptance of all conditions listed in the "Request for Proposals" document. Any exception on the Proposer's behalf must be stated in the proposal cover letter.
II. Qualification and Experience (maximum of 10 pages): The proposed Engineering Team shall have experience working with public agencies in similar assignments. It is highly desirable that the key project team members have served public agencies in various capacities, are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies.
Qualifications and experience to be shown in the proposal shall include, but not be limited to the following:
• Project organizational chart.
• Identification of experience of principal staff members, including major subconsultants. Resumes of principal staff should not exceed one page per person.
• Identify the availability of your team and the percentage of current workload of staff that would be committed to this project, including sub-consultants. • Experience of the firm, the team and subconsultants on similar projects.
III. Scope of Work and Project Approach (maximum 10 pages): The Consultant shall include in their proposal a detailed scope of work and understanding of the process to undertake such a project and complete it in compliance with all applicable rules, regulations, standards and requirements. Other items to include:
• Description of your firm's quality/control (Q/C) and quality/assurance (Q/A) procedures that will be used for the Project.
• Provide a project schedule for various activities by the Engineering Team involved and identify the milestones of major tasks of the Project. • Discussion of document control.
6 IV. Consultant shall submit a fee proposal for the Project in a SEPARATE SEALED ENVELOPE (or separate email attachment) marked “Fee Proposal” along with the Project title. The City will negotiate with the top-ranked consultant in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines.
Fee proposal shall include all tasks required to perform the work with a maximum not-to-exceed fee for each task and a grand total not-to-exceed fee.
The fee proposal must contain a task and fee breakdown of all components of cost, including labor base rate, overhead and all other direct and indirect costs.
The fee proposal shall clearly show hours and cost per task. The task and fee breakdown must match the scope of services in the format, as presented within the RFP. The Consultant and all sub-consultants shall not be compensated by the City for any time spent on commuting to or from the Project site and other peripheral work not directly performed as a result of this Project. The Consultant shall provide their services for the duration of the Project for the approved scope of work and fee. The proposal must remain valid for at least 90 days from the due date of this RFP.
The City will short list the list of candidates to three consulting firms, of which it may interview prior to selection of the top candidate for the project.
V. Prevailing wages will apply if the services to be performed meet the criteria according California Department of Industrial Relations web site at:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/statistics_research.html. City will not assume any responsibility for Contractor’s failure to pay prevailing wages in accordance with State law.
B. EXAMINATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS
By submitting a proposal, Consultant represents that it has thoroughly examined and become thoroughly familiar with the work required under this RFP and has the staffing and resources capable of performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives.
C. ADDENDA
Any changes to the requirements will be made by written addendum to this RFP.
Any written addenda issued pertaining to this RFP shall be incorporated into the terms and conditions of any resulting Agreement. City will not be bound to any modifications to or deviations from the requirements set forth in this RFP as the result of oral instructions. Consultants shall acknowledge receipt of addenda in their proposals.
7 D. QUESTIONS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Questions relating to this RFP shall be emailed to the Public Works Department at:
[email protected] no later than Wednesday March 8, 2023, at 1:00PM.
E. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL
Proposals are due on or before Thursday March 16, 2023, at 1:00PM.
One (1) electronic PDF copy of the proposal shall be emailed to the Public Works Department at: [email protected] with Proposal for:
Traffic Calming Toolkit in the email Title.
The Fee Proposals shall be emailed to the Public Works Department at:
[email protected] with Fee Proposal for: Traffic Calming Toolkit F. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
The successful Consultant shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, insurance policies as listed in Section 17 - Insurance Requirements of the attached sample Professional Service Agreement (PSA), attachment B.
All insurance policies must be open to inspection by the City and copies of policies must be submitted to the City and/or upon written request.
G. SELECTION CRITERIA
Responses to this RFP will be evaluated using a point rating system, as shown in Section IV. The evaluation will be completed by a selection committee composed of staff from the Public Works Department.
H. CHANGES IN THE RFP
Should any prospective proposer be in doubt as to the true meaning of any portion of this (RFP), or should the proposer find any ambiguity, inconsistency, or omission therein, the Proposer shall make a written request for an official interpretation or correction. Such requests must be received by the Public Works Department not less than five (5) working days prior to the final date of submittal of the proposals.
Such interpretation or correction, as well as any additional RFP provisions that the City may decide to include, will be made only as an official addendum, and will be sent to each firm recorded as having received a copy of the RFP. Any addendum issued by the City shall become part of the RFP and will be incorporated into the proposal.
8 I. DISCLOSURES
Under the Freedom of Information Act (Public Act 442), the City is obligated to permit review of its files, if requested by others. All information in a submitter’s proposal is subject to disclosure under this provision. This act also provides for a complete disclosure of contracts and attachments thereto.
J. POST-SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES
After reviewing and evaluating the proposals that are received, the City will select one or more firms with whom it will negotiate a Professional Services Agreement (PSA).
A sample of the standard PSA is included in Attachment B. Those who wish to submit a proposal to the City are required to carefully review the PSA.
ThePSA will include aScope ofServices and FeeSchedule (not-to-exceedamount), both of which may be modified by mutual consent during the negotiation phase. The Insurance Requirements outlined in the PSA may not be revised or changed. Prior to its final execution by the selected firm and the City, the PSA must be submitted to, and approved by, City Council and/or the City Manager.
The City reserves the right to award the total proposal, to reject any and all proposals in whole or in part, and to waive any informality or technical defects if, in the City’s sole judgment, the best interests of the City will be so served.
K. COST LIABILITY
The City of Lomita assumes no responsibility or liability for costs incurred by the Consultant prior to the execution of a Professional Services Agreement. The liability of the City is limited to the terms and conditions outlined in the Agreement.
L. INVOICES
Consultant shall submit invoice(s) at the end of each month for the work performed.
Each invoice at a minimum shall include the following information:
1. Project name
2. Period for which invoice is submitted
3. Invoice number
4. Task name
5. Balance remaining and percent completed for each task
6. Total project budget (approved tasks only) and remaining balance
7. Each employee’s name, hours of work, date, task, rate, and total charge
8. Invoices must be accompanied by payroll and any other supporting documents that will be necessary to expedite the review and approval process
9 M. GUIDELINES DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Consultants/contractors shall comply with all local, state and federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Governor’s and Los Angeles County Health Officer’s orders and guidance related to COVID-19, social distancing, and best practices.
Consultants/Contractors are required to check with the latest guidelines of the Los Angeles County Public Works and the Los Angeles County Public Health for construction sites during the Coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic.
Disclosure: Consultants shall disclose in their responses to any Request for Proposals whether they have been the subject of any legal investigation by County, State, and/or Federal agencies within the past 5 years. If so, each responding consultant shall identify the agency and contact person, the nature of the investigation and any determination over outcome of said investigation. Noncompliance with this section shall result in rejection of the Proposal, but a consultant’s disclosure of any such investigation (even one which resulted in a determination that was adverse to the consultant) will not automatically result in rejection of the Proposal. The occurrence, nature, underlying facts and outcome of any such investigation are not by themselves determinative but are simply included among many factors that will be considered by the City in evaluating Proposals.
10 SECTION III
SCOPE OF SERVICES
DESCRIPTION
This RFP is to solicit proposals for engineering services to complete a toolkit for traffic calming for the City of Lomita. The following scope of work is a minimum suggested scope for the work of the project. The City of Lomita is requesting proposals from qualified and experienced Civil Engineering firm(s) to prepare a traffic calming toolkit to meet the needs of the City.
The Consultant may provide additional tasks which they feel is pertinent to or adds value to achieving the City’s overall project objectives.
The following tasks include, but are not limited to:
Task 1 – General Project Administration & Meetings
• Consultant shall assign a project manager that will serve as the point of contact and coordinate all communication with the City of Lomita staff. The Consultant must provide an experienced Engineering Team that has knowledge and understanding of traffic calming measures, relevant federal, state, and county standards, as well as other industry standards and appropriate application. • Consultant shall coordinate a kick-off meeting with Lomita staff and subconsultants to discuss the scope of the project, develop a work plan to accomplish the project goals, schedule, and identify future constraints. • In addition to the kick-off meeting, the Consultant shall plan for sufficient meetings with Lomita staff to complete the project. Consultant shall prepare agendas for all meetings and submit them to the City two (2) working days prior the meeting for review. For each meeting, Consultant shall record minutes and distribute them within five (5) working days of the meeting. • Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports with each invoice. Progress reports shall contain work performed, project concerns and impacts, and the work anticipated for the next month.
• Invoices shall detail the team member, hours worked, task, and date of hours worked.
Task 2 – Review Background Studies and Plans
The consultant shall review existing programs from adjacent local agencies, Los Angeles County, existing City practices and concerns, industry standards, and other model agency programs. In addition, the consultant shall review traffic investigation requests and collision data relevant to the City. Consultant shall create a matrix of potential traffic calming improvements to be used for discussion at the City’s Public Safety and Traffic Commission Workshops. The improvements may be categorized 11 into options that can be implemented by City maintenance crews to more extensive changes that would be incorporated when a Street Capital Improvement Project is scheduled. The matrix shall take into consideration data/criteria that is readily available to the City.
Task 3 - Community Workshops / Public Meetings
The consultant shall conduct two (2) community workshops in coordination with the Public Safety and Traffic Commission to gather information regarding specific traffic issues and concerns from community members. Public Safety and Traffic Commission meetings are scheduled for the third Wednesday of each month at 6 P.M. The agenda package is finalized and published the week prior to the meeting.
City staff will assist in alerting the community about the workshops through its website, community newsletters, and social media.
Workshop #1
• Gather information regarding specific concerns and traffic related issues on residential streets in Lomita.
• Provide traffic calming improvement matrix from Task 2 to create a dialog on what community members like or dislike about specific traffic calming improvements.
Workshop #2 / Presentation of Draft Report
• Concerns and comments made at the first workshop will be addressed and presented as part of the second workshop agenda.
• Gather information regarding specific concerns and traffic related issues on residential streets in Lomita.
• Provide a revised traffic calming improvement matrix (with feedback from Workshop #1) to create a dialog on what community members like or dislike about specific traffic calming improvements. The matrix will include at a minimum the traffic calming measure, criteria for implementation, and cost to implement and maintain.
• Workshop #2 should include, at a minimum, six (6) examples of how the matrix elements could be implemented at specific locations within Lomita.
Presentation
• The consultant shall present the findings from the community workshops, the key points of the final report, and application examples at a City Council meeting.
12 • City Council meetings are held the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6 P.M. The agenda package is finalized and published the week prior to the meeting.
Task 4 - Project Documentation
The consultant shall prepare a draft report with findings from Workshops #1 and submit to the City for review. Following feedback, the consultant will present the traffic calming matrix and draft report to the community and Public Safety and Traffic Commission.
The report shall include a toolkit of potential traffic calming measures that address community concerns. The traffic calming measures should include qualifying criteria with details and explanations and expected cost to implement and maintain.
The consultant shall prepare a final report that addresses the comments and questions raised at the Workshop #2 for final consideration and approval by City Council.
The final report shall include one (1) digital pdf copy, one (1) digital native file copy, and two (2) bound hard copies for submission to the City. 13 SECTION IV
SELECTION OF CONSULTANTS
All proposals will be evaluated by a City of Lomita Selection Committee (Committee). The Committee may be composed of City of Lomita staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in the services described herein. The Committee will review the submittals and will rank the proposals. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the Committee. All contacts during the evaluation phase shall be through the City of Lomita Project Manager only.
The selection committee will review the submitted proposals according to the below evaluation criteria and weighting factors. The committee will then establish a shortlist based on the highest ranked proposals. The shortlist will include enough qualified consultants to ensure that at least three consultants are interviewed.
After the interview, the committee will reestablish a final ranking of the highest ranked consultants. The highest ranked consultant will be selected for the project. Cost proposals for all qualified consultants will be opened and used to begin negotiations, however, with the highest ranked consultant. If an agreement on fees cannot be reached, then negotiations will proceed to the second highest qualified consultant, and so on and so forth until a final agreement is reached with a consultant.
The proposals will be evaluated based on the following:
A. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS - 20 points
Identify individuals who will be assigned to this project by name, title and their role on this project. Indicate which of these individuals you consider key to the successful completion of the project. Resumes or qualifications are required for proposed project personnel who will be assigned to the project. Qualifications and capabilities of any sub-consultants shall be included.
B. PAST EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS - 30 points
The written proposal must include a list of specific experience in the project design area and indicate proven ability in similar projects for the firm and the individuals to be assigned to the project. Experience should include traffic engineering, traffic standards, and facilitating a public workshop. The proposal should also indicate the ability to have projects completed within the budget and schedule. A complete list of client references must be provided for similar projects completed. It shall include the firms/agencies name, address, telephone number, project title, and contact person.
14 C. PROPOSED WORK PLAN – 40 points
A detailed work plan is to be presented and should outline the overall project understanding, approach, and list all tasks determined to be necessary to accomplish the overall scope of the project. The work plan shall include, but is not to be limited to, the objectives/tasks listed in the RFP. The work plan shall define resources needed for each task (title and labor hours) and staff persons completing the project element tasks. In addition, the work plan shall include a timeline schedule depicting the sequence and duration of tasks showing how the work will be organized and executed.
The work plan shall be sufficiently detailed and clear to identify the progress milestones, i.e. when project elements, measures, and deliverables are to be completed. Additional project elements suggested by the proposer that are thought to be necessary for the completion of the project are to be included in the work plan and identified as proposer-suggested elements.
Identify all of those, if any, who will be subcontracted to assist you with this project, and the extent of work for which they will be responsible. Include similar reference data for subcontractors and employees as requested above for the main proposer.
Include any other information that you believe to be pertinent but not specifically asked for elsewhere.
D. FEES - 10 points
Submit a fee schedule in a separate sealed envelope with proposal. Fee schedule shall clearly identify each task, number of hours assigned to each task, name and title of individual assigned to each task, hourly rate of each individual, and total hours and total dollar amount for the project.
E. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATOR
Include the name and phone number of person(s) in the organization authorized to negotiate the Professional Services Agreement with the City. 15 ATTACHMENT - A
GENERAL CITY MAP
253rd St
Narbonne Ave
Oak St
Lomita Blvd
Oak St
Walnut St
Cypress St
Lomita Blvd
255th St
250th St
Narbonne Ave
Pennsylvania Ave
248th St
Western Ave
263rd St
Pacific Coast Hwy
254th St
253rd St
Feijoa Ave
Palos Verdes Dr N
242nd St
261st St
Eshelman Ave
245th St
Appian Way
Ebony Ln
Regent Ave
Andreo Ave
260th St
251st St
240th St
Rolling Vista Dr
Cayuga Ave
243rd St
Via Madonna
253rd Pl
257th St
256th St
262nd St
Via Desmonde
246th Pl
259th Pl
247th St
246th St
249th St
241st St
Viana Ave
Woodward Ave
Moon Ave
Crenshaw Blvd
Alta Vista Ave
252nd St
Doria Ave
Glentree Dr
247th Pl
Fairview Ave
Dawn St
Turrell St
Lucille Ave
Reed Dr
Bland Pl
Market Pl
Guyson St
Hillworth Ave
Lomita Park Pl
Allbrook St
Kelley Ave
Callison St
Chapman St
Alliene Ave
Nordman St
Steed Ct
Saddle View Rd
Cadiz Dr
Falena Ave
April Ct
Wittick Ct
Avocado St
Via Nova
Esther View Dr
Evans Ct
Hillcrest Ave
Alcor St
Leola St
Benhill Ave
Robin Ln
Forrester Dr
Ocean View Ave
Reed St
Garner St
Via Solano
Stratford Dr
McKenna Ct
Olson Ln
Adamo Ave
Comal Ct
Bani Ave
Abita Ave
Austinbrook Ct
Neko Dr
Noelle Ct
Aubrey Ln
Cypress Circle Dr
Via Tampa
255th St
Lucille Ave
248th St
253rd St
251st St
256th St
248th St
Bani Ave
247th St
246th St
241st St
Doria Ave
247th St
261st St
Alliene Ave
253rd Pl
256th St
259th Pl
254th St
253rd Pl
257th St
262nd St
Woodward Ave
252nd St
259th St
Via Marquette
Monte Vista Ave
Lomita Dr
258th Pl
Ovid Ave 264th St
Hendricks Ave
Stanhurst Ave
Park Haven Pl
Eleanor Pl
Adona Dr
Via Enca nto
Padron Pl
Pennsylvania Dr
Murad Ave
Carlene Ln
Via Vera
Veronica Ln
Monterey Cir
Hillview Ln
Danmar Ct
Ober Ave
Becknel Ave
252nd St
Bani Ave
Appian Way
254th St 254th St
Forrester Dr
ATTACHMENT - B
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
(SAMPLE)
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF LOMITA AND _____________
This AGREEMENT for ______ Project is entered into this day of , 202_, by and between the CITY OF LOMITA, a general law city and municipal corporation (“CITY”) and ____________ (“CONTRACTOR”).
R E C I T A L S
A. CITY does not have the personnel able and/or available to perform the services required under this agreement.
B. Therefore, CITY desires to contract out for __________________.
C. CONTRACTOR warrants to CITY that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities to perform properly and timely the services under this Agreement.
D. CITY desires to contract with CONTRACTOR to perform the services as described in Exhibit A of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the foregoing recitals, CITY and CONTRACTOR agree as follows:
1. CONSIDERATION AND COMPENSATION.
A. As partial consideration, CONTRACTOR agrees to perform the work listed in the SCOPE OF SERVICES, attached as Exhibit A;
B. As additional consideration, CONTRACTOR and CITY agree to abide by the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement;
C. As additional consideration, CITY agrees to pay CONTRACTOR an amount not to exceed $_____ for CONTRACTOR’s services, unless otherwise specified by written amendment to this Agreement.
D. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved by the City Manager or his designee.
E. CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, by not later than the 10th day of each month, its bill for services itemizing the fees and costs incurred during the previous month. CITY shall pay CONTRACTOR all uncontested amounts set forth in the CONTRACTOR'S bill within 30 days after it is received.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
A. CONTRACTOR will perform the services and activities set forth in the SCOPE OF SERVICES attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
If any part of Exhibit A is inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall control.
B. Except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by CITY, CONTRACTOR will, in a professional manner, furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space, and facilities necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the professional services required of CONTRACTOR by this Agreement.
3. PAYMENTS. For CITY to pay CONTRACTOR as specified by this Agreement, CONTRACTOR must submit an invoice to CITY which lists the reimbursable costs, the specific tasks performed, and, for work that includes deliverables, the percentage of the task completed during the billing period.
4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The services of CONTRACTOR are to commence upon receipt of a notice to proceed from CITY and shall continue until all authorized work is completed to CITY’s reasonable satisfaction, in accordance with the schedule incorporated in “Exhibit A,” unless extended in writing by CITY.
5. FAMILIARITY WITH WORK. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that CONTRACTOR has (a) thoroughly investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed; (b) carefully considered how the services should be performed; and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.
6. KEY PERSONNEL. CONTRACTOR’s key person assigned to perform work under this Agreement is . CONTRACTOR shall not assign another person to be in charge of the work contemplated by this Agreement without the prior written authorization of CITY.
7. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon execution by both parties and shall expire on ________, unless earlier termination occurs under Section 13 of this Agreement, or extended in writing in advance by both parties.
8. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TRAINING. The contractor shall implement and maintain activity specific Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent pollutant loading from stormwater and non-stormwater discharges to receiving waters as required in Municipal NPDES Permit No. CAS004004. Contracting staff whose primary job duties are related to implementation of BMPs shall be adequately trained to effectively implement, operate, and maintain such BMPs and must be versed in factors affecting BMP effectiveness. The contractor shall certify they have received all applicable training to implement the requirements in Municipal NPDES Permit No.
CAS004004 and shall provide documentation to that effect.
9. CHANGES. CITY may order changes in the services within the general scope of this Agreement, consisting of additions, deletions, or other revisions, and the contract sum and the contract time will be adjusted accordingly. All such changes must be authorized in writing, executed by CONTRACTOR and CITY. The cost or credit to CITY resulting from changes in the services will be determined in accordance with written agreement between the parties.
10. TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. CONTRACTOR will provide CITY with a Taxpayer Identification Number.
11. PERMITS AND LICENSES. CONTRACTOR will obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all permits, licenses, and certificates that may be required by local, state and federal laws in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement, including a business license as specified in Title VI, Chapter 2 of the Lomita Municipal Code.
12. LAWS AND REGULATIONS; EMPLOYEE/LABOR CERTIFICATION.
CONTRACTOR shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. CONTRACTOR shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with the Services and this Agreement. All violations of such laws and regulations shall be grounds for CITY to terminate the Agreement for cause
13. PREVAILING WAGE.
A. Prevailing Wage. CONTRACTOR is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONTRACTOR agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.
Upon request, CITY shall provide CONTRACTOR with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the CONTRACTOR’S principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and CONTRACTOR shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law.
CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
B. Registration/DIR Compliance. If the services are being performed on a public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). CONTRACTOR shall maintain registration for the duration of the project and require the same of any subcontractors. This project may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractors that affect CONTRACTOR’S performance of services, including any delay, shall be CONTRACTOR’S sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered CONTRACTOR caused delay and shall not be compensable by CITY.
CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the DIR against CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor.
C. Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, CONTRACTOR certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.
D. Employment of Apprentices. CONTRACTOR and all subcontractors shall comply with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
E. CONTRACTOR or subcontractors may not perform work on a public works project with a subcontractor who is ineligible to perform work on a public project pursuant to Labor Code section 1777.1 or 1777.7. Any contract on a public works project entered into between CONTRACTOR and a debarred subcontractor is void as a matter of law. A debarred subcontractor may not receive any public money for performing work as a subcontractor on a public works contract. Any public money that is paid or may have been paid to a debarred subcontractor by CONTRACTOR on the project shall be returned to CITY. CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the payment of wages to workers of a debarred subcontractor who has been allowed to work on the Project.
F. CONTRACTOR agrees to bind every subcontractor to the terms of the Agreement as far as such terms are applicable to subcontractor’s portion of the work.
CONTRACTOR shall be as fully responsible to CITY for the acts and omissions of its subcontractor and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by its subcontractor, as CONTRACTOR is for acts and omissions of persons directly employed by CONTRACTOR. Nothing contained in these Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between any subcontractor and CITY.
14. TERMINATION.
A. Except as otherwise provided, CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination shall be in writing.
B. CONTRACTOR may terminate this Agreement. Notice will be in writing at least 30 days before the effective termination date.
C. In the event of such termination, CONTRACTOR shall cease services as of the date of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, drawings, maps, and other materials prepared by CONTRACTOR shall, at CITY’s option, become CITY’s property, and CONTRACTOR will receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed up to the effective date of notice of termination.
D. Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this Section, CITY may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.
15. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with CONTRACTOR's performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation.
CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
B. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by CONTRACTOR as required by Section 19, and any approval of said insurance by CITY, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by CONTRACTOR pursuant to this Agreement, including, without limitation, to the provisions concerning indemnification.
16. ASSIGNABILITY. This Agreement is for CONTRACTOR’s professional services.
CONTRACTOR’s attempts to assign the benefits or burdens of this Agreement without CITY’s written approval are prohibited and will be null and void.
17. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. CITY and CONTRACTOR agree that CONTRACTOR will act as an independent contractor and will have control of all work and the manner in which is it performed. CONTRACTOR will be free to contract for similar service to be performed for other employers while under contract with CITY. CONTRACTOR is not an agent or employee of CITY and is not entitled to participate in any pension plan, insurance, bonus or similar benefits CITY provides for its employees. Any provision in this Agreement that may appear to give CITY the right to direct CONTRACTOR as to the details of doing the work or to exercise a measure of control over the work means that CONTRACTOR will follow the direction of the CITY as to end results of the work only.
18. AUDIT OF RECORDS.
A. CONTRACTOR agrees that CITY, or designee, has the right to review, obtain, and copy all records pertaining to the performance of this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR agrees to provide CITY, or designee, with any relevant information requested and will permit CITY, or designee, access to its premises, upon reasonable notice, during normal business hours for the purpose of interviewing employees and inspecting and copying such books, records, accounts, and other material that may be relevant to a matter under investigation for the purpose of determining compliance with this Agreement.
CONTRACTOR further agrees to maintain such records for a period of three (3) years following final payment under this Agreement.
B. CONTRACTOR will keep all books, records, accounts and documents pertaining to this Agreement separate from other activities unrelated to this Agreement.
19. CORRECTIVE MEASURES. CONTRACTOR will promptly implement any corrective measures required by CITY regarding the requirements and obligations of this Agreement. CONTRACTOR will be given a reasonable amount of time as determined by CITY to implement said corrective measures. Failure of CONTRACTOR to implement required corrective measures shall result in immediate termination of this Agreement.
20. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.
A. CONTRACTOR, at CONTRACTOR’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies:
1. Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. CONTRACTOR shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees. Any notice of cancellation or non-renewal of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by CITY at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against CITY, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by CONTRACTOR for CITY.
2. General Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain commercial general liability insurance in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit.
3. Automobile Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of CONTRACTOR arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired, and non-owned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence.
4. Professional Liability Coverage. CONTRACTOR shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors, or omissions which may arise from CONTRACTOR’S operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by CONTRACTOR or by its employees, subcontractors, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit-per-occurrence basis. When coverage is provided on a “claims made basis,” CONTRACTOR will continue to renew the insurance for a period of three (3) years after this Agreement expires or is terminated.
Such insurance will have the same coverage and limits as the policy that was in effect during the term of this Agreement, and will cover CONTRACTOR for all claims made by CITY arising out of any errors or omissions of CONTRACTOR, or its officers, employees or agents during the time this Agreement was in effect.
B. Endorsements. Each general liability, automobile liability and professional liability insurance policy shall be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California, or which is approved in writing by CITY, and shall be endorsed as follows. CONTRACTOR also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise.
1. “The CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of the CONTRACTOR, including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.”
2. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers.
Any insurance maintained by CITY, including any self-insured retention CITY may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with this policy.
3. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each, except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
4. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, or agents.
5. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to CITY, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers.
6. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days’ written notice has been received by CITY.
C. CONTRACTOR agrees to provide immediate notice to CITY of any claim or loss against Contractor arising out of the work performed under this agreement.
CITY assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve CITY.
D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by CITY. At CITY’s option, CONTRACTOR shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.
E. CONTRACTOR shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to CITY as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein.
Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with CITY on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with CITY at all times during the term of this Agreement.
F. Failure on the part of CONTRACTOR to procure or maintain required insurance shall constitute a material breach of contract under which CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 13 above.
G. The commercial general and automobile liability policies required by this Agreement shall allow CITY, as additional insured, to satisfy the self-insured retention (“SIR”) and/or deductible of the policy in lieu of the CONTRACTOR (as the named insured) should CONTRACTOR fail to pay the SIR or deductible requirements. The amount of the SIR or deductible shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney and the Finance Director. CONTRACTOR understands and agrees that satisfaction of this requirement is an express condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement. Failure by CONTRACTOR as primary insured to pay its SIR or deductible constitutes a material breach of this Agreement. Should CITY pay the SIR or deductible on CONTRACTOR’S behalf upon CONTRACTOR’S failure or refusal to do so in order to secure defense and indemnification as an additional insured under the policy, CITY may include such amounts as damages in any action against Contractor for breach of this Agreement in addition to any other damages incurred by CITY due to the breach.
21. USE OF OTHER CONTRACTORS. CONTRACTOR must obtain CITY’s prior written approval to use any Contractors while performing any portion of this Agreement. Such approval must include approval of the proposed Contractor and the terms of compensation.
22. FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE CONSTITUTES RELEASE. The acceptance by the CONTRACTOR of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of CITY from all claims and liabilities for compensation to the CONTRACTOR for anything done, furnished or relating to the CONTRACTOR’S work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of CITY’S check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by CITY shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect or error in the work prepared by CONTRACTOR, its employees, sub-Contractors and agents.
23. CORRECTIONS. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, the CONTRACTOR shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during CITY’S review of CONTRACTOR’S report or plans. Should the CONTRACTOR fail to make such correction in a reasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by CITY, and the cost thereof shall be charged to CONTRACTOR. In addition to all other available remedies, CITY may deduct the cost of such correction from any retention amount held by CITY or may withhold payment otherwise owed CONTRACTOR under this Agreement up to the amount of the cost of correction.
24. NON-APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. Payments to be made to CONTRACTOR by CITY for services preformed within the current fiscal year are within the current fiscal budget and within an available, unexhausted fund. In the event that CITY does not appropriate sufficient funds for payment of CONTRACTOR’S services beyond the current fiscal year, the Agreement shall cover payment for CONTRACTOR’S only to the conclusion of the last fiscal year in which CITY appropriates sufficient funds and shall automatically terminate at the conclusion of such fiscal year.
25. NOTICES. All communications to either party by the other party will be deemed made when received by such party at its respective name and address as follows:
CITY CONTRACTOR
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
ATTN: City Manager
ATTN:
Any such written communications by mail will be conclusively deemed to have been received by the addressee upon deposit thereof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as noted above. In all other instances, notices will be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names or addresses of persons to whom notices are to be given by giving notice in the manner prescribed in this paragraph. Courtesy copies of notices may be sent via electronic mail, provided that the original notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or personally delivered as specified in this Section.
26. SOLICITATION. CONTRACTOR maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, CONTRACTOR warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than CONTRACTOR’s bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. Should CONTRACTOR breach or violate this warranty, CITY may rescind this Agreement without liability.
27. THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. This Agreement and every provision herein is generally for the exclusive benefit of CONTRACTOR and CITY and not for the benefit of any other party. There will be no incidental or other beneficiaries of any of CONTRACTOR’s or CITY’s obligations under this Agreement.
28. INTERPRETATION. This Agreement was drafted in, and will be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, and exclusive venue for any action involving this agreement will be in Los Angeles County.
29. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement, and its Attachments, sets forth the entire understanding of the parties. There are no other understandings, terms or other agreements expressed or implied, oral or written.
30. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. Each Party had the opportunity to independently review this Agreement with legal counsel. Accordingly, this Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning; it will not be interpreted strictly for or against either Party.
31. AUTHORITY/MODIFICATION. The Parties represent and warrant that all necessary action has been taken by the Parties to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to engage in the actions described herein. This Agreement may be modified by written amendment with signatures of all parties to this Agreement. CITY’s city administrator, or designee, may execute any such amendment on behalf of CITY.
32. ACCEPTANCE OF FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES. The Parties agree that this Agreement will be considered signed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission, scanned and delivered via electronic mail, or delivered using digital signature technology approved by CITY. Such facsimile or electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.
33. FORCE MAJEURE. Should performance of this Agreement be impossible due to fire, flood, explosion, war, embargo, government action, civil or military authority, the natural elements, or other similar causes beyond the Parties’ control, then the Agreement will immediately terminate without obligation of either party to the other.
34. TIME IS OF ESSENCE. Time is of the essence to comply with dates and schedules to be provided.
35. ATTORNEY’S FEES. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that party or those parties may be entitled.
36. STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE. By executing this Agreement, CONTRACTOR represents that it has demonstrated trustworthiness and possesses the quality, fitness and capacity to perform the Agreement in a manner satisfactory to CITY.
CONTRACTOR represents that its financial resources, surety and insurance experience, service experience, completion ability, personnel, current workload, experience in dealing with private Contractors, and experience in dealing with public agencies all suggest that CONTRACTOR is capable of performing the proposed contract and has a demonstrated capacity to deal fairly and effectively with and to satisfy a public agency.
37. DISCLOSURE REQUIRED. (CITY and CONTRACTOR initials required at one of the following paragraphs)
By their respective initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is a “contractor” for the purposes of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties would require him or her to make one or more of the governmental decisions set forth in Fair Political Practices Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) or otherwise serves in a staff capacity for which disclosure would otherwise be required were CONTRACTOR employed by CITY. CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledges his or her assumingoffice, annual, and leaving-office financial reporting obligations under the California Political Reform Act and the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code and agrees to comply with those obligations at his or her expense. Prior to Contractor commencing services hereunder, the City’s Manager shall prepare and deliver to CONTRACTOR a memorandum detailing the extent of CONTRACTOR’S disclosure obligations in accordance with the CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
OR
By their initials next to this paragraph, CITY and CONTRACTOR hereby acknowledge that CONTRACTOR is not a “contractor” for the purpose of the California Political Reform Act because CONTRACTOR’S duties and responsibilities are not within the scope of the definition of contractor in Fair Political Practice Commission Regulation 18700.3(a)(2) and is otherwise not serving in staff capacity in accordance with CITY’S Conflict of Interest Code.
City Initials ______
Contractor Initials ______
[signatures on following page]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this contract the day and year first hereinabove written.
CITY OF LOMITA CONTRACTOR
Ryan Smoot, City Manager By:
ATTEST:
Kathleen Horn Gregory, City Clerk Taxpayer ID No.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Trevor Rusin, City Attorney
Proposal for
Engineering Services for a
Traffic Calming Toolkit
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 1
Table of Contents
I. Cover Letter............................................................................................................................ 2 II. Qualification and Experience................................................................................................... 3 III. Scope of Work and Project Approach..................................................................................... 13 IV. Fee Proposal in Separate Email ............................................................................................. 21 Appendices ............................................................................................................................... 22 Appendix 1. Exceptions to the Contract................................................................................. 22 Appendix 2. Resumes........................................................................................................... 23 Appendix 3. Acknowledgement of Response to Questions Addendum ..................................34 Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 2
I COVER LETTER
March 16, 2023
RE: Proposal for Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
The City of Lomita (City) is a friendly, small-town community with over 20,000 residents and a vibrant downtown full of local businesses. The City desires to preserve the local character while reducing the speed of traffic and providing a safe environment for pedestrians through the development of a traffic calming toolkit. As the City prepares to develop a traffic calming toolkit, selecting a committed and responsive team with the right combination of local knowledge and extensive public agency experience in traffic engineering, planning, and design is critical in achieving your traffic safety goals and vision. Kimley-Horn has assembled a team that has significant relevant experience and covers the full range of skillsets needed to deliver this project. As you review our proposal, please keep in mind the following attributes Kimley-Horn can bring to the table:
Knowledge and Understanding of Local Environment. Living and working in the South Bay and the surrounding communities, our project manager, Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E., understands the local conditions and has vested interest in the success of the area. In fact, Laura has relocated to Kimley-Horn’s new Long Beach office as of this month to be available to further provide more accessible support to the region. Given her transition over to this new office, our team is now situated less than 10 miles away from the City. Our location and understanding gives our team the ability to provide solutions tailored to the community and to be available for last minute field visits and meetings.
Extensive Traffic Calming Experience. Kimley-Horn’s traffic engineers and transportation planners have supported the development of traffic calming policies including the Laguna Niguel Traffic Manual, Lancaster Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan, and the Bakersfield Neighborhood Traffic Calming Plan. Kimley-Horn has also recently implemented traffic calming projects throughout Southern California, including the Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Ventura Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities Project, Malibu Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, and the Diamond Bar Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP). Kimley-Horn has worked alongside stakeholders through workshops, presentations, and field visits to develop traffic calming plans and toolkits that are effective and practical for their community.
Additionally, our team members bring over 50 years of combined traffic engineering staff augmentation experience for the cities of Agoura Hills, Buena Park, Hawthorne, Laguna Niguel, Malibu, and South Gate. We understand how to work with and serve public agencies and their residents.
Through these augmentation roles, we have received countless traffic calming requests. We are experienced at developing context sensitive solutions, hosting community workshops and liaison meetings, and presenting recommendations to elected officials. We will bring our experience and lessons learned from this and other projects to provide a plan that will meet the project’s goals while keeping the project’s budget and schedule at the forefront of design decisions.
Full-Service Engineering. With the Kimley-Horn team, your best interest will always be the focus of our efforts. We understand the project is not just developing a toolkit, but also proposing solutions for specific locations to residents and elected officials. As a fullservice consulting firm, we can provide you a full range of services including roadway design to identify constructability constraints; environmental services to determine the proper CEQA clearance; streetscape and landscape design to maintain the community’s character; graphic design and translation services to support public meetings; and grant writing to help identify funding opportunities. This gives you the comfort of knowing that the proposed solutions have been thoroughly vetted and a wide range of activities are all under the management and quality control of one firm, which means less coordination that you need to perform, better decisions, better communication, increased productivity, and quicker, more accurate project deliverables that are consistent with your needs.
Our team appreciates your consideration of our proposal. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact project manager Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E. directly at 562.549.2186, by email at [email protected], or at the address listed above. We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E. Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E.
Project Manager/Associate Principal-in-Charge/Vice President Required Statements
As Vice President of Kimley-Horn, Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E., is authorized to sign on behalf of Kimley-Horn and to bind Kimley-Horn in a contract. Sri can be reached at our Downtown Los Angeles office at 660 South Figueroa Street Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017, via email at [email protected], or at 213.261.4037.
As stated in the City’s Response to Questions, Exceptions to the contract have been included in an Appendix under the title, “Appendix 1. Exceptions to the Contract.”
Kimley-Horn is in receipt of and certifies the City’s Response to Questions Addendum, dated March 10, 2023.
City of Lomita – Public Works
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
To From
245 E. 3rd Street
Long Beach, CA 90802
TEL 562.549.2186
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 3
II QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE
Firm Profile
Kimley-Horn is a full-service engineering,
planning, and environmental consulting firm
providing services to public and private sector
clients nationwide. Since our founding in 1967,
Kimley-Horn has grown from a small group of
traffic engineers and transportation planners to
a firm of over 6,800 employees in 114 offices
nationwide, including 13 in California. Our
continued growth and stability over the past 56
years is the direct result of our commitment
to integrity and dedication to providing quality
services to our clients. We provide our clients with
the local knowledge and responsiveness of a small
organization, backed by the depth of resources
only a national firm could offer.
Combining national experience with a local sensibility, Kimley-Horn’s professionals provide comprehensive solutions to the analysis of public and private projects. We offer extensive experience in transportation impact analysis, transportation planning, transit planning, traffic engineering, and infrastructure financing mechanisms for transportation and utility improvements. Today, we are one of the highest ranked engineering, planning, and environmental consulting firms in the U.S. According to Engineering News-Record, our firm now ranks 10th overall among the nation’s top 500 design firms. These rankings represent the combined efforts of our staff, who are committed to providing client-focused service and technical excellence in everything we do.
Our Team
Kimley-Horn knows that when you choose a consulting firm, you are looking to choose the people who will bring you technical specialties, hands-on experience with similar projects, and a commitment to timely, first-rate deliverables and client service. That’s why we’ve carefully considered the composition of our engineering team, identifying only the most qualified personnel with recent, relevant experience working with public agencies on similar assignments to be able to work with you.
Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E., a successful Kimley-Horn project manager, will lead our team using her over 10 years of experience in traffic engineering and traffic calming projects of similar size and scope. Laura has a proven track record of successfully managing projects, scope schedule, and budget for multidisciplinary projects. She currently serves as project manager on the City of Laguna Niguel’s Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management and the City of Ventura’s Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities projects. From this extensive experience, Laura has gained critical knowledge of the needs and challenges of traffic calming projects. Additionally, Laura has experience hosting public workshops, neighborhood liaison meetings, and presenting to subcommittees and City Councils. Using her extensive experience with similar projects and her experience working in the surrounding areas, Laura will oversee our proposed team of highly qualified engineers and planners specializing in traffic engineering projects. Laura will also serve as your day-to-day contact, allowing our team to establish and maintain a close working relationship with City staff throughout the life of the project.
Supporting Laura is principal-in-charge, Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E. and quality control and quality assurance manager (QC/QA) Sowmya Chandrasekhar, P.E., T.E., PTOE. Sri offers over 19 years of experience in traffic operations and transportation engineering, partnering with local public agencies on a wide variety of traffic signal synchronization, complete streets projects, and on-call traffic engineering services. Sowmya brings over 15 years of traffic engineering experience to provide constructability and QC/QA reviews of documents prior to sending them to the City. Rounding out our leadership team, Tim Chan, P.E., Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2B, Matt Stewart, P.E., and Justin Gatza, P.E. will serve as task managers for background research, outreach, and engineering, respectively.
Our core team is a group of experienced design engineers and technical specialists who have decades of proven experience working with public agencies on a variety of traffic engineering and traffic calming projects with components similar to the City’s.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 4
Organizational Chart
Kimley-Horn has assembled an exceptional team of professionals who have experience providing similar services for public agencies, have served public agencies in various capacities, are accustomed to working with governmental agencies, and have a good understanding of public agency issues, procedures, and policies while also possessing proven project management capabilities and commitment to providing the City with timely and high-quality deliverables. See below for the organization of our proposed engineering team. Resumes for each principal staff member have been provided starting on the following page. Full principal staff resumes and additional support staff resumes can be found in Appendix 2.
Availability of Team
Kimley-Horn uses a proactive management system known as “cast-aheads” to detail every project’s personnel needs and determine each staff person’s availability. Based upon a review of our cast-aheads, we can confirm that the proposed staff members selected for this team are available immediately to serve you and are in an excellent position to handle the workload required to see this project through. In addition, Laura has the authority to mobilize Kimley-Horn’s 6,800+ firmwide resources at any given time to meet the City’s needs on this important project. Each team member’s level of commitment is shown in the table below.
Team Member % Available for this Project
Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E. 55%
Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E. 30%
Sowmya Chandrasekhar, P.E., T.E., PTOE 35%
Tim Chan, P.E. 55%
Darryl dePencier, AICP GISP, RSP2B 40%
Matt Stewart, P.E. 55%
Justin Gatza, P.E. 35%
Kyle McGowan, AICP 50%
Rossina Chichiri 60%
Tiffany Barie, EIT 60%
Angelo Pastelin, EIT 75%
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 5
Laura is a professional civil and traffic engineer with over a decade of traffic operations and transportation engineering experience ranging from small design projects and task orders to large design-build environments and City Traffic Engineer roles. Her background encompasses traffic analysis, neighborhood traffic calming studies, and transportation planning. Laura’s key areas of specialty include extensive knowledge of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) methodologies; microsimulation knowledge using VISSIM, SimTraffic, and ALPS, traffic calming/context sensitive solutions, traffic signal warrants, signal design and plan presentation, and signal timing and optimization (SYNCHRO). Prior to joining KimleyHorn, Laura served as technical lead for multimodal microsimulation models, traffic studies, and signing and marking design. Laura is proficient in Microstation.
Relevant Experience
) City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Manager ) City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Manager ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA– Project Manager ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Project Engineer ) City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Engineering Design Services, Ventura, CA – Project Manager
) City of Diamond Bar, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP), Diamond Bar, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Local Roadway Safety Plan, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, SB 743 Implementation, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Kanan Road/Agoura Road Ultimate Intersection Improvements Project, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Agoura Hills, Kanan Road Traffic Study, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Malibu, PCH (Route 1) Mobility Improvements at Various Locations, Malibu, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Oxnard, Fifth Street and Rice Avenue Grade Separation PS&E, Oxnard, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Moorpark, Los Angeles Avenue Traffic Study, Moorpark, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Laguna Niguel, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Manager Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E.
Role on Project: Project Manager
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Georgia
Institute of Technology
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Georgia
Institute of Technology
> Professional Civil Engineer in
California #93146
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2818
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 6
Sri has more than 19 years of traffic engineering experience. Since beginning his career with Los Angeles County prior to joining Kimley-Horn, Sri has participated in a wide variety of transportation planning, traffic calming, and on-call traffic engineering services. His project management experience includes neighborhood traffic calming studies, corridor planning, signal justification studies, site-specific traffic circulation. safety studies traffic signal design, and traffic impact studies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA – Project Manager
) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Contract Manager
) City of Simi Valley, Local Road Safety Plan, Simi Valley, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster Master Plan of Complete Streets (MPCS), Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster Safe Routes to School Plan, Lancaster, CA – Principal-In Charge ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Contract Manager ) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Traffic Calming Improvements, Los Angeles, CA – Principal-In Charge ) City of Santa Monica, Bicknell Avenue Green Street/Complete Street, Santa Monica, CA – Project Engineer Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E.
Role on Project: Principal-in-Charge
Title in Firm: Vice President/Senior Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Louisiana
State University
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Kakatiya University
> Professional Civil Engineer in
California #73629
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2531
Professional Affiliations
> Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Past President
> City Traffic Engineers, Past Chair
Sowmya brings over 15 years of professional experience as a transportation engineer. She is experienced in corridor operational analyses, traffic impact analyses, traffic signal designs, illumination designs, temporary/permanent traffic control plans, traffic control warrant analyses, parking studies, pedestrian studies, crash analyses, and innovative intersection improvements. She has provided support for the development of transportation simulation models, preparation of grant applications, and review of connected vehicle applications for agencies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager
) City of Diamond Bar, On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Diamond Bar, CA – Project Manager
) City of Diamond Bar, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) on North Del Sol Lane and Highland Valley Road, Diamond Bar, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School Master Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster, Local Road Safety Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Manager Sowmya Chandrasekhar, P.E., T.E., PTOE
Role on Project: QC/QA Manager
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Missouri University
of Science & Technology
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Visvesvaraya
National Institute of
Technology, India
> Professional Engineer in
California #83100
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2760
> Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer #3323
Professional Affiliations
> Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
> Orange County Traffic Engineering
Council (OCTEC), Member
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 7
Tim has 11 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering design. His traffic engineering experience includes preparing traffic signal design, signing and striping, streetlight, traffic control, and interconnect plans. Tim has conducted and managed the field investigation and design tasks on numerous projects. His attention to detail and knowledge of field conditions has translated into successful designs and constructible plans. Additionally, he has worked with public and private sector clients on a variety of traffic impact studies, transportation analyses, and parking evaluations throughout the Southern California region. Tim is experienced in a wide range of transportation-related software packages, including Synchro, SimTraffic, Traffix, and Vistro, and is knowledgeable of planning and design standards for local and state agencies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Newport Beach, Newport Heights Neighborhood Study, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Newport Beach, East Coast Highway Signal Rehabilitation Design, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Newport Beach, Streetlight Improvement, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) Los Angeles County, Woodruff Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Various Cities in Los Angeles County, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Industry, Fullerton Road Grade Separation, Industry, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Anaheim, Euclid Street Offsite Improvements, Anaheim, CA – Project Engineer Tim Chan, P.E.
Role on Project: Background Research
Title in Firm: Senior Professional I
Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
Polytechnic University, Pomona
> Professional Engineer in
California #85687
Darryl has been conducting transportation safety for more than 15 years.
His focus is multimodal transportation planning and system development including neighborhood traffic calming, transit accessibility, bicycle and pedestrian mobility, traffic safety, and sustainability. His experience ranges from statewide assessment and policy advising, regional support for long range transportation planning, and local goals and priority setting. He builds plans to be accessible for the public and decision-makers, using a robust analytical framework founded in defensible data science. Darryl is experienced working with the public to provide education on transportation planning opportunities and trade-offs, building consensus and incorporating feedback with the empirical findings to achieve a plan that is both data driven and community based.
Relevant Experience
) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Planner ) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Planner ) City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA – Project Planner ) City of Moreno Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Audits, Moreno Valley, CA – Project Planner ) City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA – Project Planner
) County of Ventura, Local Road Safety Plan, Ventura County, CA – Project Manager ) City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA – Project Manager
Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2B
Role on Project: Outreach
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Urban
Spatial Analytics, University
of Pennsylvania
> Bachelor of Arts, Geography,
Carleton University, Ottawa
> Certificate, Geographic
Information Systems, Algonquin
College, Ottawa
> American Institute of Certified
Planners #026552
> Geographic Information Systems
Professional #59317
> Road Safety Professional 2
Behavioral (RSP2) #17
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 8
Matt has experience in traffic engineering, transportation planning, and traffic safety analysis. His specialties include traffic signal operations and design, on-call traffic engineering, traffic impact analysis, and parking analysis. Most recently, he worked on two traffic signal synchronization projects in Orange County, specifically Barranca TSSP in Irvine, Santa Ana, and Fountain Valley, and Aliso Creek TSSP in the cities of Laguna Woods, Aliso Viejo, and Laguna Niguel. Matt has experience in data collection and field review, traffic signal timing optimization, traffic management center (TMC) and controller cabinet timing implementation, fine-tuning, and corridor before and after studies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Engineering Design Services, Ventura, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Agoura Hills, Traffic Signal Design at Thousand Oaks Boulevard/Argos Street, Agoura Hills, CA – Analyst ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway Signal System Improvements Project, Malibu, CA – Analyst ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway Mobility Improvements at Various Locations, Malibu, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, Aliso Creek Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Multiple Cities, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, El Toro Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst Matt Stewart, P.E.
Role on Project: Toolkit/Documentation
Title in Firm: Professional I
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley
> Bachelor of Science,
Civil and Environmental
Engineering, University of
California, Los Angeles
> Professional Engineer in
California #90465
numerous public works facilities throughout Southern California. His experience spans a wide range of areas, including roadway geometrics, pavement rehabilitation, complete streets and active transportation, traffic calming, pedestrian and bicycle safety and accessibility, water, sewer and storm drain replacements, stage construction and traffic control, traffic signing/striping, and construction support. Justin has prior experience working in the public sector as a project manager, which has given him a dual perspective on administrating and managing project. Justin also has extensive experience with Caltrans District 7, including encroachment permitting, federal funding administration through local assistance, and full design oversight related to the preparation of PSR/PDS, PA/ED, and PS&E documents.
Relevant Experience
) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Civil/Roadway Lead ) City of Alhambra, 710 North Arterial/I-10 Interchange Improvement Concepts, Alhambra, CA – Deputy Project Manager ) City of Camarillo, Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes PA&ED and PS&E, Camarillo, CA – QC/QA ) City of Los Angeles, Broadway-Manchester Active Transportation Equity Project, Los Angeles, CA – QC/QA ) City of Lancaster, On-Call Roadway and Structures; Traffic Engineering; and Drainage, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Engineering, Lancaster, CA – QC/QA
Justin Gatza, P.E.
Role on Project: Toolkit/Documentation
Title in Firm: Professional II
Justin brings over 12 years of professional civil engineering experience leading and supporting the planning, design, and construction of Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona
> Professional Engineer in
California #83496
Professional Affiliations
> American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), Member
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 9
Relevant Project Experience and References
Our long-term relationships with public agencies have provided us with broad project experience and local knowledge. Our clients know that with Kimley-Horn they experience better. How do we know this? They consistently tell us we deliver remarkable results and we’re great people to work with—and we live for that. We are proud of our working relationships with our clients and much of our success over the last 56 years is directly related to our efforts to provide consistent, high-quality, and timely services. As trusted advisors, our firm works diligently on behalf of our clients’ needs.
Per the City’s RFP, we have provided descriptions of our firm and team’s experience on similar projects with public agencies. In addition to our experience, we have provided client references for each of the project descriptions. We invite you to contact them directly to allow them the opportunity to comment on our professional qualifications and experience.
City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA Kimley-Horn is developing the City’s Traffic Manual that outlines the City’s processes for study and implementation of traffic control devices. The Traffic Manual formalizes the City’s process for handling resident requests and an incremental approach to addressing concerns. The Traffic Manual addresses the following focus areas: traffic signals, two-way and all-way stop control, traffic calming, parking restrictions, sight distance, signal timing and phasing, pedestrian enhancements, and bicycle/e-bike enhancements. Kimley-Horn also serves as staff extension for their Neighborhood Traffic Management programs which addresses resident concerns. This role includes meeting with residents in the field to review their concerns, propose site-specific solutions to the Traffic and Transportation Commission, and develop design plans for implementation. Additionally, this role includes facilitating two neighborhood-school liaison groups comprised of City staff, residents, and school principals to address school-related circulation issues. Currently, Kimley-Horn is monitoring and controlling project scope, schedule, and costs using our internal Management Information System. As a result, the project is expected to be completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Laura Forinash, Tiffany Barie, Matt Stewart Client Reference: Kathy Nguyen, P.E, T.E., Engineering Services Manager at City of Laguna Niguel | 949.362.4341 [email protected] | 30111 Crown Valley Parkway, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan, Lancaster, CA Kimley-Horn is currently working with the City of Lancaster to update their 2016 Safe Routes to School Master Plan for 30 public schools. The refreshed plan will include enhanced community outreach and engagement activities as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which include gathering input from students, teachers, parents, and administrators regarding the effectiveness of different elements of the program. The plan will also focus on changes in travel patterns and updated profiles of the City’s transportation system to confirm that the program will be adapted to suit those elements. One of the key project objectives is to minimize conflicts between roadway users and students by creating a safe environment for walking and cycling to school as well as work toward the City’s Vision Zero safety goals through improved engineering, education, and enforcement approaches.
Currently, Kimley-Horn is monitoring and controlling project scope, schedule, and costs using our internal Management Information System. As a result, the project is expected to be completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Sowmya Chandrasekhar, Darryl dePencier, Kyle McGowan Client Reference: Candice Vander Hyde, Analyst for Community Development at City of Lancaster | 661.723.5851 [email protected] | 44933 Fern Avenue, Lancaster, CA 93534 KEEP
CLEAR
BUS
LANE
KEEP
CLEAR KEEP
CLEAR
KEEP
CLEAR
VIA ESTUDIO
NIGUEL
HILLS
MIDDLE
SCHOOL Update all existing signage
to reflect new times
N
PASEO LOMITAPASEO LOMITA
SHARK BAY SHARK BAY
NO PARKING OR
STOPPING
7 - 10 AM
12 - 4 PM SCHOOL DAYS
ONLY ONLY
BUSES
EXEMPT
BUSES
EXEMPT
RIGHT LANE
MUST
TURN RIGHT
BUSES EXEMPT
Shark Bay Improvements - Option 3
Improved health and safety for all those biking and walking to school, whether itʼs you, your child, or your neighbors.
Students you care about will arrive at school, alert and ready to learn.
Build more sidewalks and bike paths for school trips
with connected routes for all travel needs.
See your own needs and values included in the plan
for your neighborhood school.
Walkable neighborhoods with bike paths and
sidewalks you most want to use.
Less congestion and stress from student drop-offs,
and lower household transportation costs.
Lower local costs by helping the city attract
state and federal dollars.
WHATʼS
IN IT FOR
ME ?
Thousands of schools across the country are working to
provide safe and convenient bicycling and walking routes to school, thanks to the Safe Routes to School (SRTS) initiative.
The Lancaster SRTS Master Plan is our own City-wide
plan that aims to make it easier and safer for students to walk, bike, skate, scoot or roll to school in Lancaster. It will reflect the particular needs, conditions, concerns and values of our community, as it seeks to reduce injuries, encourage increased physical activity and reduce congestion at dropoff/pick-up zones near schools.
As Lancaster welcomes students back into the classroom, now is the perfect time to help establish “new normal” trips to school that are healthy, safe and fun for our kids.
WHAT IS A
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
MASTER PLAN?
THE CITY OF LANCASTER IS UPDATING ITS
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL MASTER PLAN,
AND WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Our Master Plan
integrates the
7 Es of SRTS
FALL 2021
Select and
prioritize solutions
WINTER 2021 SPRING 2022
Data collection and
community engagement
Finalizing and start
funding the plan
HAGA CLIC
PARA LA VERSIÓN
EN ESPAÑOL DE
ESTE FOLLETO
ENGAGEMENT
ENCOURAGEMENT
EQUITY
EVALUATION
ENGINEERING
ENFORCEMENT
EDUCATION
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 10
City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA Kimley-Horn developed a toolbox of traffic calming solutions for the City of Bakersfield to use to respond to neighborhood requests for reductions in cut-through traffic and vehicle speeds in residential neighborhoods. The plan provided clear guidance on what solutions are appropriate for which contexts including vehicle speed, traffic volume, transit route, roadway geometry, and other factors as appropriate. A scorecard was developed for each traffic calming solution to identify the level of effectiveness, cost, and impact to the surrounding environment. The KimleyHorn team participated in several public engagement efforts including a public workshop and the 34th Street Neighborhood Partnership meeting. The outreach events consisted of parents, residents, staff from the Bakersfield City School District, the Bakersfield Police Department’s traffic division, the Kern County Department of Human Services (DHS), and the Community
Action Partnership of Kern (CAPK). The workshop participants were invited to participate in an exercise that allowed them to choose which of the traffic calming solutions they would like to see implemented on their neighborhood streets. This project was completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Darryl dePencier, Sowmya Chandrasekhar,
Sri Chakravarthy, Kyle McGowan, Rossina Chichiri
Client Reference: Ed Murphy, Civil Engineer III at City of Ventura | 661.326.3958 [email protected] | 1501 Truxtun Avenue, Bakersfield, CA 93301-5201 City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Engineering Design Services, Ventura, CA
Kimley-Horn is currently providing civil engineering design services to prepare conceptual, and construction plans for active transportation improvements including pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic calming improvements for the Westside Community in the City of Ventura. The project encompasses 14 street segments throughout westside Ventura with 2 miles of bike boulevards, 3,500 linear feet of sidewalk upgrades, 11 curb ramps upgrades, 23 continental crosswalks, 8 bus shelter upgrades, two curb extensions, four rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), two speed feedback signs, and street lighting improvements. The goal of this project is to create a design that serves the City’s residents and safely connects them to transit as well as employment community centers. In addition to preparing a PS&E package, KimleyHorn is responsible for conducting a traffic engineering study, turning movement analyses, and drainage analyses prior to the development of conceptual designs. Once conceptual designs and renderings have been developed, Kimley-Horn will conduct outreach to stakeholders and the community to gather feedback on the proposed design. Currently, Kimley-Horn is monitoring and controlling project scope, schedule, and costs using our internal Management Information System. As a result, the project is expected to be completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Laura Forinash, Sri Chakravarthy, Matt Stewart Client Reference: Jeff Hereford, Principal Transportation Engineer at City of Ventura | 805.654.7744 [email protected] | 501 Poli Street, City Hall, Room 120, Ventura, CA 93002
NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC
Calming Program
21 Scorecard
Speed HumpsSpeed CushionSpeed KidneysSpeed TableRaised CrosswalkRaised Intersection Speed
Volumes
Cut-Through Traffic
Collisions
Pedestrian Safety
Bicycle Safety
Emergency Vehicles
Impacts on Noise
Cost
VERTICAL
DEFLECTIONS
25 Low Medium High Very High
Increases Reduces No Change Cost
Impacts No Impact
Example of a speed table implementation
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 11
City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA Kimley-Horn developed, and installed traffic calming measures for the Pointe Dume Neighborhood to reduce vehicle speeds, reduce cutthrough traffic, and improve safety for pedestrians and bicycles. Kimley-Horn conducted a neighborhood survey to understand the resident’s concerns and hosted four public workshops to discuss solutions with the neighborhood. The project installed speed humps in select locations coordinated with the Fire Chief. Speed limits were reduced in multiple locations citing residential districts and speed feedback signs were installed. Edgeline striping was installed in areas where on-street parking was encroaching into the travel way. This project was completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Sri Chakravarthy, Rossina Chichiri, Laura Forinash Client Reference: Rob DuBoux, Esq., P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer at City of Malibu 310.456.2489 ext. 339 [email protected] | 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, CA 90265 City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA
Kimley-Horn assisted the Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks to conduct an engineering assessment of Crystal Springs Drive and Griffith Park Drive in Griffith Park, the largest municipal park in the City of Los Angeles. The project included an evaluating of existing conditions on the study roadways and preparing recommendations to reduce cut-through traffic, calm traffic, and improve safety for all road users. Kimley-Horn prepared conceptual plans for short-term, mid-term, and long-term improvements. Recommended improvements included Class II and Class IV bicycle facilities, crosswalk improvements, reduction in curb radii at intersections, and speed humps. Kimley-Horn presented the recommendations to several groups of stakeholders and participated in community engagement workshops. As part of the project, ridership data was obtained from LA Metro and need to consolidate/remove bus stops was assessed. Kimley-Horn also provided construction support for all aspects of the project, including the conversion of Griffith Park Drive to an active transportation roadway. This project was completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Sowmya Chandrasekhar, Matt Stewart, Justin Gatza Client Reference: Tracy James, Special Projects for Griffith Region Park Services at City of Los Angeles, Department of Recreation and Parks 323.661.9465 | [email protected] | 4800 Crystal Springs Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027 Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 12
City of Newport Beach, Newport Heights Neighborhood Study, Newport Beach, CA The Newport Heights area of Newport Beach is a residential area that is home to three schools within the Newport-Mesa Unified School District (Newport Heights Elementary, Ensign Intermediate School, and Newport Harbor High School). At the beginning and end of each school day, the neighborhood streets experience a heavy concentration of students and parents associated with each school. The City of Newport Beach retained Kimley-Horn to evaluate the school-related traffic flows to and from the schools as well as the current drop-off/pick-up operations. Pedestrian, bicycle, and radar speed survey data were collected. Kimley-Horn also conducted a neighborhood parking analysis, sight distance analysis at side streets along 15th Street, and school signage inventory for each school. Recommended measures were provided to consider for implementation. Kimley-Horn also created info-graphics for public outreach and City Council meetings. This project was completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Tim Chan
Client Reference: Brad Sommers, City Traffic Engineer at City of Newport Beach | 949.644.3326 [email protected] | 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 City of Agoura Hills, Traffic Engineering On-Call, Agoura Hills, CA Kimley-Horn has been providing on-call traffic engineering services to the City of Agoura Hills since 2009. Kimley-Horn staff are providing general on-call traffic engineering services, project management, staff augmentation and engineering services for a variety of infrastructure and capital improvement projects and city programs/services. The project types include oversight of all work typically required for the successful delivery of the various types of projects, intersection control studies including multiway and traffic signal warrant analyses, conducting engineering and traffic surveys, traffic engineering investigations, traffic calming measures, field review, meeting with residents, safety studies and review of collision history at certain locations, street improvements/resurfacing/streetscape, active transportation projects, traffic signal and electrical installations, analysis and review of potential roundabout installations, plan check and site visits, traffic study reviews, Public Works maintenance projects, presenting to the Public Works Subcommittee, Planning Commission, and City Council, and roadway widening projects. Due to the high-quality services provided by Kimley-Horn, our contract was expanded to include civil engineering services. Projects have been completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Laura Forinash, Sri Chakravarthy, Rossina Chichiri, Matt Stewart, Angelo Pastelin, Tiffany Barie, Sowmya Chandrasekhar, Darryl dePencier, Tim Chan
Client Reference: Ramiro Adeva III, P.E., Assistant City Manager at City of Agoura Hills | 818.597.7353 [email protected] | 30001 Ladyface Court, Agoura Hills, CA 91301 City of Hawthorne, Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA Kimley-Horn has been providing on-call traffic engineering services since 2022. Kimley-Horn is assisting the City in completing multiple capital improvement projects including the traffic signal design of over 15 intersections along Hawthorne Boulevard, El Segundo Boulevard, Imperial Highway, and Rosecrans Avenue. Kimley-Horn also assists the City in day-to-day traffic engineering matters including traffic calming requests, speed hump requests, traffic signal complaints, pedestrian enhancements, on-street parking inventory, all-way stop control warrants, access management for private development, and school circulation. Projects have been completed on time and within budget.
Team Members: Laura Forinash, Angelo Pastelin, Justin Gatza, Rossina Chichiri, Tiffany Barie, Sowmya Chandrasekhar, Sri Chakravarthy Client Reference: Akbar Farokhi, Director of Public Works at City of Hawthorne | 310.349.2980 [email protected] | 4455 West 126th Street, Hawthorne, CA 90250 Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 13
III SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT APPROACH
Project Understanding
Kimley-Horn understands that the City is seeking a qualified engineering firm to develop a traffic calming toolkit to reduce the speed of traffic and provide safer environments for pedestrians while maintaining the local character. The toolkit will provide City staff a variety of proven countermeasures to deploy based on the resident’s concerns and facility type. Providing safe facilities for all users and modes is vital to the City’s health, success, and overall livelihood of its residents. Kimley-Horn’s approach will focus on the following considerations:
BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE TOOLKIT
Our goal is to create a comprehensive toolkit of proven countermeasures that addresses a range of traffic issues specific to Lomita and considers the City’s various street configurations. The toolkit will be based on the latest industry standards and refined using community and staff feedback. Lastly, the toolkit will be checked for consistency with existing programs and policies. It is critical for the toolkit to be a complete, standalone document that City staff can rely on to standardize responses to resident concerns, to aid in the selection of traffic calming measures, and to reference for the future programming of the proposed improvements.
LISTENING TO THE COMMUNITY
We understand the success of any project requires community input and support. While our team is local to the South Bay, the community has intimate knowledge of the local traffic issues which is critical in identifying successful solutions. The community workshops provide an environment for community members to voice their concerns as well as an opportunity for the project team to educate the public on the reasoning behind why some decisions are made or solutions not feasible. Incorporating community feedback into the toolkit provides the public with a vested interest in the safety of the City’s infrastructure, helps manage the expectations of the community, and makes certain the City receives positive feedback as they begin to implement the identified solutions.
APPLYING CONTEXT SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS
Our goal is to provide a toolkit that compliments the character and history of Lomita while providing safer environments for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. The toolkit will provide solutions to a breadth of traffic issues including vehicle speeds, cutthrough traffic, collisions, pedestrian safety, and bicycle safety. The toolkit will identify what types of facilities the tools can be applied considering the roadway classification, speed limit, vehicle volume, bicycle facility type, transit route, adjacent land-uses such as schools and downtown business districts, emergency vehicle route, truck route, and roadway grade. We understand that each concern is unique; therefore, we will develop context sensitive solutions. Exhibit 1 on the following page illustrates the variety of facility types found in Lomita along with common concerns and potential solutions.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 14
LOCATION:
Narbonne Avenue - Lomita Elementary School
FACILITY TYPE:
School crossing
POTENTIAL ISSUES:
Pedestrian safety
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS*:
High-intensity activated crosswalk (HAWK) beacons,
pedestrian refuge island, bulbouts
LOCATION:
Narbonne Avenue
FACILITY TYPE:
Central business district
POTENTIAL ISSUES:
Pedestrian safety and vehicle speeds
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS*:
Leading pedestrian interval at signalized crosswalks and placemaking features such as decorative paving and
landscaped medians
LOCATION:
Narbonne Avenue / 243rd Street
FACILITY TYPE:
Secondary highway
POTENTIAL ISSUES:
Pedestrian safety and vehicle speeds
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS*:
Bulbouts, northbound edgeline striping, and yield lines in advance of the crosswalk
LOCATION:
Eshelman Avenue
FACILITY TYPE:
Collector Street
POTENTIAL ISSUES:
Vehicle speeds and bicycle safety
POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS*:
Reduce the width of travel lanes and add bicycle buffer Exhibit 1 - Potential Traffic Calming Measures at Different Facility Types in Lomita *Potential solutions are preliminary recommendations and will be thoroughly vetted through City input, neighborhood meetings, context sensitivity, and best practices.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 15
Scope of Work
Task 1 – General Project Administration and Meetings
Kimley-Horn will provide project management for each task detailed in this scope of services, which is assumed to be 4-5 months from notice to proceed (NTP). Management activities consist of attending meetings, creating and updating of the project schedule, budget tracking, coordination with the City, and maintaining project information, quality assurance, and project administration.
Task 1.1 - Meetings
A kick-off meeting will be completed upon NTP to discuss the scope of the project, present a workplan and schedule, and identify future constraints. Monthly progress meetings will be coordinated and scheduled with the City for the duration of the project, which is assumed to be 4-5 months. These progress meetings will provide opportunities for Kimley-Horn to report upon the status of the project, coordinate activities, and review schedule.
In addition, Kimley-Horn will participate in up to five (5) conference calls with the City, and communicate through emails and phone calls, throughout the length of the project.
Task 1.2 - Schedule
We will prepare an initial schedule within the first two weeks following the issuance of the NTP. The schedule will include tasks, project milestone dates, workshop events, and agency review periods for project submittals. The schedule will be monitored during the life of the project. If schedule delays occur or appear likely, Kimley-Horn will advise the City of the situation and recommend corrective actions as appropriate. The schedule will be updated monthly, or as required, to reflect changes and progress on major milestones throughout the duration of the project.
Task 1.3 - Project Administration
Project files will be maintained for the duration of the project. Progress reports and billing statements will be prepared following the end of each month. Progress reports will contain work performed, project concerns and impacts, and the work anticipated for the next month. Invoices will detail the effort by team member, hours worked, task, and date of hours worked. This task includes the assistance with project correspondence, billings, and submittals.
Task 2 – Review Background Studies and Plans
Kimley-Horn will review existing standards, programs, and policies that will guide the selection of the toolkit’s solutions. The toolkit will be based on the latest industry standards for traffic calming, pedestrian safety, and bicycle safety. Guidance and best practices from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) will serve as a foundation for the City’s tool kit.
Task 2.1 – Literature Review
The Kimley-Horn team will review four peer city plans and guidance documents to document current best practices for neighborhood traffic calming in the United States. Kimley-Horn will identify the effectiveness, implementation criteria, and advantages/disadvantages for each traffic calming method. A summary of the review will be included in the draft report in Task 4 for the City’s review. Below is just a sample of the documents that will be reviewed:
ÂTraffic Calming Guidance Interim Memo (Caltrans)
ÂCalifornia Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans) ÂProven Safety Countermeasures (FHWA)
ÂTraffic Calming ePrimer (FHWA)
ÂTraffic Calming to Slow Vehicle Speeds (FHWA)
ÂTraffic Safety Tool Kit (LA County Department of Public Works) ÂUrban Street Design Guide (NACTO)
Deliverables:
. Schedule and Schedule Updates
Deliverables:
. Monthly Progress Reports and Invoices
Deliverables:
. Preparation of Meeting Agendas
and Meeting Notes
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 16
Task 2.2 – Policy Framework Review
Kimley-Horn will review the City’s adopted plans relevant to the traffic calming toolkit. Kimley-Horn will review existing City traffic calming programs and other ordinances that may impact the implementation of traffic calming solutions. The review will include an interview with City staff to determine what challenges and opportunities exist that could favor some solutions over others. A summary of the review will be included in the draft report in Task 4 for the City’s review. Below is just a sample of the documents and policies that will be reviewed:
ÂCity of Lomita’s General Plan
ÂCity of Lomita’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
ÂCity of Lomita’s Downtown Lomita Design Manual
ÂCity of Lomita’s Municipal Code
ÂCalifornia Vehicle Code
Task 2.3 – Traffic Calming Matrix
Kimley-Horn will create a matrix with traffic calming measures that were identified in Task 2.1 and found to be consistent with the existing plans and policies in Task 2.2. This matrix will include a comprehensive set of solutions that are both infrastructure and regulatory to help the City and residents choose the most locally appropriate options. The matrix will discuss each potential traffic calming measure in detail, including the typical applications, roadway classification, advantages and disadvantages, construction and maintenance costs, effectiveness, and impacts to noise and emergency vehicle access. The matrix also discusses where the potential traffic calming measures are appropriate to help determine which measures can be implemented at a particular location.
Kimley-Horn will work with City staff to select the most appropriate measures and will continue to refine the matrix through the public workshop in Task 3 with the goal of identifying up to 15 traffic calming solutions for the City’s Toolkit in Task 4.
Task 3 – Community Workshops/Public Meetings
Our community engagement strategy will be integral to the success of this project. We will host two (2) community workshops where the Kimley-Horn team, in coordination with the City’s Public Safety and Traffic Commission, will meet with residents to understand their traffic concerns and gather feedback on the toolkit. Our team has extensive experience in various types of community involvement, and we will work with the City to tailor our approach to the City’s needs and stakeholders.
Task 3.1 - Workshop #1 – Data Gathering
This workshop will take place following the development of the matrix in Task 2. The purpose of the workshop is to gather feedback from the community on the proposed traffic calming measures and listen to their specific concerns and traffic related issues. Kimley-Horn will provide a brief presentation of the proposed traffic calming measures in the draft matrix. The Kimley-Horn team will work with City Staff and the City’s Public Safety and Traffic Commission to identify the best format to gather resident feedback. Formats could include speaker cards, surveys, roundtable discussions, interactive map activities, and prioritization activities.
Task 3.2 - Workshop #2 – Draft Report
The project team will host a second workshop to present the draft traffic calming report developed in Task 4 to the public and the Public Safety and Traffic Commission. Kimley-Horn will summarize the feedback that was received during the first workshop and present site-specific traffic calming solutions to the public. Graphic and visual materials will be used to present the elements of the toolkit and discuss how constraints, technical findings, and community input were considered in the final recommendations for site-specific concerns. Kimley-Horn will provide conceptual designs and renderings of the proposed recommendations.
Task 3.3 - City Council Meeting
Kimley-Horn will provide a summary of the project to City Council. The presentation will highlight how the project is consistent with the City’s vision, how community feedback was incorporated into the report, and demonstrate how to implement the toolkit through project specific locations.
For all meetings the Kimley-Horn team will prepare associated materials, including agendas, sign-in sheets, presentation slideshow, and notes summarizing the meeting discussion. Handouts will also be prepared in a manner that communicates complex technical material in an easy-to-understand format, including graphics and imagery. Materials will be translated to Spanish by a member of our team who is bilingual. Real time language interpretation can be provided during the workshops.
Deliverables:
. Draft Traffic Calming Matrix
. Final Traffic Matrix
Deliverables:
. Three (3) sets of Meeting Materials
(handouts, agendas, sign-in sheets,
presentations, notes)
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 17
In addition to the feedback through in-person meetings, Kimley-Horn can use an interactive mapping software, PublicCoordinate, which provides a interactive process to solicit feedback from the public. This tool offers enhanced capabilities such as comment input, toggling between multiple project locations and base maps, ADA web accessibility, custom branding, and survey integration. Its online platform is user-friendly, making it easy for the public to provide input and visualize what the community would look like with proposed traffic calming or infrastructure improvements
Task 4 – Project Documentation
Task 4 will develop the documentation for the City’s traffic calming toolkit that will become a guide for traffic management in the City.
Task 4.1 – Case Studies
Following workshop #1, Kimley-Horn will identify a minimum of six (6) case study locations that will be used to demonstrate how the toolkit will be implemented. The case study locations and proposed traffic calming solutions will based on feedback from Workshop #1. The case study locations will vary in facility type, facility user, and traffic issue. Kimley-Horn will review readily available data including Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWIRTS) collision data and roadway network traffic volumes using a big-data platform, Replica. For each case study, Kimley-Horn will provide recommendations using an incremental approach as shown in Exhibit 2. These case study recommendations will be presented to the public during Workshop #2 (Task 3.2). Kimley-Horn will incorporate the feedback from Workshop #2 and finalize the case studies in for the Traffic Calming Report (Task 4.2).
Task 4.2 – Traffic Calming Report
The Traffic Calming Report will summarize the findings of the previous tasks. The report will Deliverables:
identify the goals and objectives of traffic calming in Lomita. The report will include a summary . Draft Traffic Calming Report of the literature review and existing policy framework identified in Task 2. The report will compile . Final Traffic Calming Report the community feedback from the workshops in Task 3. The report will include the final traffic calming matrix from Task 2.3 which identifies typical applications, costs, implementation criteria, effectiveness, and advantages/disadvantages. The report will include the case study locations as examples of implementing the matrix as well as the recommended incremental approach to traffic calming. Kimley-Horn will develop a flow chart of the traffic calming process to assist City Staff. through the traffic calming processes. A defined process is recommended to standardize the responses to residents and ensure consistent implementation. This task Kimley-Horn will address up to two rounds of comments on the Draft Traffic Calming Report and Final Traffic Calming Report.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 18
TIER 2
Install Traffic Circle
TIER 1
TIER 1 Install Sharrows
Install Sharrows
TIER 2
Install Bulbouts
TIER 1
Install Buffer for Bike Lane
ESHELMAN AVE
262ND ST
262ND ST
APPIAN WAY
ESHELMAN AVE
REGENT AVE
Exhibit 2 - An Incremental Approach to Traffic Calming on 262nd Street and Eshelman Avenue *Potential solutions are preliminary recommendations and will be thoroughly vetted through City input, neighborhood meetings, context sensitivity, and best practices.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 19
Quality Control/Quality Assurance
Since our founding, Kimley-Horn has aggressively pursued a commitment to quality for every task, deliverable, and service provided by the firm. We see ourselves as an extension of client staff and place tremendous emphasis on maintaining high standards of quality from the inception of a task through completion for both our work and our subconsultants’ work. That’s why we’ve developed a Quality Control/Quality Assurance (QC/QA) manual that every project manager and task manager is required to know and use. Kimley-Horn’s QC/QA program is based on the philosophy that:
ÂQuality is achieved by adequate planning, coordination, supervision, and technical direction; proper definition of the job requirements and procedures; understanding the scope of services; and the use of appropriately skilled personnel performing work functions carefully
ÂQuality is controlled by assigning a manager to evaluate all work and procedures followed while providing the services
ÂQuality is secured through the careful surveillance of work activities by individuals who are not directly responsible for performing the initial efforts ÂQuality is verified through independent reviews by a qualified staff member of the processes, procedures, documentation, supervision, technical direction, and staffing associated with the project development Our QC/QA program will include the review of project documents and supporting data by our task managers and key staff who will direct individual tasks. Our QC/QA program will include the following procedures to help ensure quality work and on-time product delivery:
ÂThe task manager will be responsible for being thoroughly familiar with requirements and will be given the authority to direct the project team and call upon our corporate resources, as reasonably necessary, to satisfy the project needs ÂAn internal “kick-off” meeting will be held with key individuals assigned to the task to clearly define the scope of services and establish the schedule
ÂProject meetings and decisions will be documented by a “paper trail.” All documents will be supported by appropriate data that will clearly show the choices evaluated and the basis for our recommendations ÂSupporting calculations, text, or data used to develop a document will be signed and dated by the individual involved when the services are performed. Additionally, telephone conversations and meetings that include or affect a project decision will be documented ÂTeam network review will be undertaken. Team network quality control is the day-to-day peer review that is undertaken by the project team. Documents, analyses, letters, etc., are reviewed by a team member other than the individual preparing the documents and analyses.
Review of significant analyses and documents are provided by the task manager for each task. The individual completing the checking will sign and date the documents and prepare a record of the findings. The findings will be resolved by the originator of the document and checked again until corrected. Quality control review comments will be maintained in a quality assurance file. This network review will be enhanced by weekly or bimonthly full team meetings with the task manager.
Document Control
We utilize a redundant document control system in which both hard and electronic copies of project deliverables and significant project communications are filed and tracked by project number and key words. Our streamlined electronic filing system includes records of meetings and data shared; documentation of design decisions; and data collected and/or provided by others, allowing us to quickly locate project records and respond to your requests in a timely fashion.
KIMLEY-HORN
QUALITY CONTROL IS
ACHIEVED
Through adequate planning,
coordination, supervision and
technical direction
CONTROLLED
By assigning a manager to
evaluate all work flow
and procedures
VERIFIED
Through independent reviews
by qualified staff
SECURED
Through careful surveillance of
work activities by parties not
involved in the initial efforts
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 20
Project Schedule
and Workplan
Task Description April May June July August September
1 General Project Administration & Meetings
1.1 Meetings R
1.2 Schedule
1.3 Project Administation
2 Review Background Studies and Plans
2.1 Literature Review
2.2 Policy Framework Review
2.3 Traffic Calming Matrix
3 Community Workshops/Public Meetings
3.1 Workshop #1
3.2 Workshop #2
3.3 City Council Meeting
4 Project Documentation
4.1 Case Studies
4.2 Traffic Calming Report
R Project Kick-Off Meeting Progress Meetings Project Submittal Public Meeting Name
Laura Forinash Sri Chakravarthy Sowmya
Chandrasekhar
Category/Title
Project Manager/
Professional II
Principal-inCharge/
Sr. Professional II
QA/QC/
Sr. Professional I Total Hours
Task 1 9 3 4 4 5 25
1.1 5 1 2 2 10
1.2 2 1 2 2 7
1.3 2 1 58
Task 2 14 9 30 65 118
2.1 2 2 5 25 34
2.2 2 2 10 10 24
2.3 10 5 15 30 60
Task 3 15 3 15 30 15 78
3.1 5 1 5 10 5 26
3.2 5 1 5 10 5 26
3.3 5 1 5 10 5 26
Task 4 17 13 35 60 10 5 140
4.1 2 3 5 10 10 30
4.2 15 10 30 50 5 110
55 6 22 49 69 60 65 25 10 361
City of Lomita
Traffic Calming Toolkit
March 16, 2023
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Professional II Professional I Analyst II Analyst I Sr. Technical Support Support Staff
Community Workshops/Public Meetings
General Project Administration & Meetings
Meetings
Schedule
Project Administration
Review Background Studies and Plans
Literature Review
Policy Framework Review
Traffic Calming Matrix
Workshop #1
Workshop #2
City Council Meeting
Project Documentation
Case Studies
Traffic Calming Report
TOTAL HOURS
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 21
IV FEE PROPOSAL IN SEPARATE EMAIL
Per the City’s RFP, we have submitted our fee proposal in a separate email, clearly marked with the following subject line: Fee Proposal for:
Traffic Calming Toolkit. We welcome the opportunity to discuss our fee with the City and are flexible to adjustments and refinements as necessary to better accommodate your needs on this project.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 22
APPENDICES
Appendix 1. Exceptions to the Contract
Kimley-Horn had reviewed the sample Attachment B Professional Services Agreement and requests the following modification:
15. INDEMNIFICATION.
A. CONTRACTOR shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved by CITY, and hold harmless CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature to the extent arising out of, pertaining to or relating to or in connection with CONTRACTOR’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this AGREEMENT, regardless of CITY’S passive negligence, but excepting such loss or damage which is caused by the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of CITY. Should CITY in its sole discretion find CONTRACTOR’S legal counsel unacceptable, then CONTRACTOR shall reimburse CITY its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorneys fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. CONTRACTOR shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against CITY (and its officers, officials, employees and volunteers) covered by this indemnity obligation. It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall the cost to defend charged to Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 23
Appendix 2. Resumes
Laura is a professional civil and traffic engineer with over a decade of traffic operations and transportation engineering experience ranging from small design projects and task orders to large design-build environments and City Traffic Engineer roles. Her background encompasses traffic analysis, neighborhood traffic calming studies, and transportation planning. Laura’s key areas of specialty include extensive knowledge of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) methodologies; microsimulation knowledge using VISSIM, SimTraffic, and ALPS, traffic calming/context sensitive solutions, traffic signal warrants, signal design and plan presentation, and signal timing and optimization (SYNCHRO). Prior to joining KimleyHorn, Laura served as technical lead for multimodal microsimulation models, traffic studies, and signing and marking design. Laura is proficient in Microstation.
Relevant Experience
) City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Manager ) City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Manager ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA– Project Manager ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Project Engineer ) City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Engineering Design Services, Ventura, CA – Project Manager
) City of Diamond Bar, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP), Diamond Bar, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Local Roadway Safety Plan, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, SB 743 Implementation, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Kanan Road/Agoura Road Ultimate Intersection Improvements Project, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Agoura Hills, Kanan Road Traffic Study, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Malibu, PCH (Route 1) Mobility Improvements at Various Locations, Malibu, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Oxnard, Fifth Street and Rice Avenue Grade Separation PS&E, Oxnard, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Moorpark, Los Angeles Avenue Traffic Study, Moorpark, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Laguna Niguel, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Manager Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E.
Role Role on Project: Project Manager
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Georgia
Institute of Technology
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Georgia
Institute of Technology
> Professional Civil Engineer in
California #93146
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2818
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 24
Sri has more than 19 years of traffic engineering experience. Since beginning his career with Los Angeles County prior to joining Kimley-Horn, Sri has participated in a wide variety of transportation planning, traffic calming, and on-call traffic engineering services. His project management experience includes neighborhood traffic calming studies, corridor planning, signal justification studies, site-specific traffic circulation. safety studies traffic signal design, and traffic impact studies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School Plan, Lancaster, CA – Principal-In Charge ) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure, and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Design Services, Ventura, CA – Project Manager
) City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Contract Manager
) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Principal-in-Charge ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Contract Manager ) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Traffic Calming Improvements, Los Angeles, CA – Principal-In Charge ) City of Simi Valley, Local Road Safety Plan, Simi Valley, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster, Master Plan of Complete Streets (MPCS), Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Santa Monica, Bicknell Avenue Green Street/Complete Street, Santa Monica, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Santa Monica, Ocean Park Boulevard Complete Green Street Project, Santa Monica, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Whittier, Whittier Boulevard Industrial Area Specific Plan, Whittier, CA – Traffic Engineer ) City of Malibu, PCH (Route 1) Mobility Improvements at Various Locations, Malibu, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, Agoura Road Widening (Complete Streets), Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Agoura Village Specific Plan Implementation Review, Agoura Hills, CA – Traffic Engineer ) City of Calabasas, Mulholland Highway Traffic Calming, Right Sizing Improvements, Calabasas, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Thousand Oaks, Hillcrest Drive Class II Bike Lane Evaluation, Thousand Oaks, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Oxnard, Oxnard Boulevard and Saviers Road Signal Improvements, Oxnard, CA – Project Manager Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E.
Role on Project: Principal-in-Charge
Title in Firm: Vice President/Senior Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Louisiana
State University
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Kakatiya University
> Professional Civil Engineer in
California #73629
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2531
Professional Affiliations
> Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Past President
> City Traffic Engineers, Past Chair
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 25
Sowmya brings over 15 years of professional experience as a transportation engineer. She is experienced in corridor operational analyses, traffic impact analyses, traffic signal designs, illumination designs, temporary/permanent traffic control plans, traffic control warrant analyses, parking studies, pedestrian studies, crash analyses, and innovative intersection improvements. She has provided support for the development of transportation simulation models, preparation of grant applications, and review of connected vehicle applications for agencies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School Master Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA – Project Manager
) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Project Engineer ) City of Diamond Bar, On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Diamond Bar, CA –Project Manager ) City of Diamond Bar, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) on North Del Sol Lane and Highland Valley Road, Diamond Bar, CA – Project Manager
) City of Lancaster, Local Road Safety Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster, Multi-Year Traffic Engineering, Planning, and Related Professional Services, Lancaster, CA – Senior Project Engineer
) City of Lancaster, Pedestrian Gap Closures and Street Lighting, Lancaster, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Lancaster, Health District Street Improvements and Street Lighting, Lancaster, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Lancaster, Avenue L/SR 14 (SR 138) Interchange PA&ED, Lancaster, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Lancaster, Avenue M Interchange Improvements PS&E, Lancaster, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Signal System Improvements Project, Malibu, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Norwalk, Norwalk Boulevard Traffic Signal and Interconnect Improvements, Norwalk, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of South Gate, As-Needed Engineering Services, South Gate, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Cerritos, Del Amo Boulevard Phase I, Cerritos, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Alhambra, 710 North Arterial and I-10 Interchange Improvements at I-10/Fremont Avenue, I-10/Atlantic Boulevard, and I-10/Garfield Avenue, Alhambra, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Laguna Niguel, Rancho Niguel Road Traffic Study, Laguna Niguel, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Rochester Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation (Base Line Road to Highland Avenue; 6th Street to Arrow Route), Rancho Cucamonga, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) LA Metro, North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT Planning and Environmental Study, Los Angeles to Pasadena, CA – Senior Project Engineer
) OCTA, Santa Ana Transit Cooperative Study, Santa Ana, CA – Senior Project Engineer ) OCTA, Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan Update, Orange County, CA – Project Engineer Sowmya Chandrasekhar, P.E., T.E., PTOE
Role on Project: QC/QA Manager
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Civil
Engineering, Missouri University
of Science & Technology
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, Visvesvaraya
National Institute of
Technology, India
> Professional Engineer in
California #83100
> Professional Traffic Engineer in
California #2760
> Professional Traffic
Operations Engineer #3323
Professional Affiliations
> Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
> Orange County Traffic Engineering
Council (OCTEC), Member
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 26
Tim has 11 years of experience in transportation planning and traffic engineering design. His traffic engineering experience includes preparing traffic signal design, signing and striping, streetlight, traffic control, and interconnect plans. Tim has conducted and managed the field investigation and design tasks on numerous projects. His attention to detail and knowledge of field conditions has translated into successful designs and constructible plans. Additionally, he has worked with public and private sector clients on a variety of traffic impact studies, transportation analyses, and parking evaluations throughout the Southern California region. Tim is experienced in a wide range of transportation-related software packages, including Synchro, SimTraffic, Traffix, and Vistro, and is knowledgeable of planning and design standards for local and state agencies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Newport Beach, Newport Heights Neighborhood Study, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Newport Beach, East Coast Highway Signal Rehabilitation Design, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Newport Beach, Streetlight Improvement, Newport Beach, CA – Project Engineer ) Los Angeles County, Woodruff Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Various Cities in Los Angeles County, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Industry, Fullerton Road Grade Separation, Industry, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Anaheim, Euclid Street Offsite Improvements, Anaheim, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Anaheim, On-Call Traffic Engineering Service, Anaheim, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Anaheim, Gene Autry Way Widening, Anaheim, CA – Design Engineer ) City of Orange, Glassell Street Left Turn Signal Improvements (HSIP), Orange, CA – Design Engineer ) City of Orange, Glassell Street and Palmyra Avenue Traffic Signal Improvements (HSIP), Orange, CA –Design Engineer ) City of Burbank, Midtown Commercial Corridor Signal Improvements (28 intersections), Burbank, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Irvine, Sand Canyon Avenue at Hoag Irvine Traffic Signal Modification, Irvine, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Eastvale, Traffic Signal Dilemma Zone Detection and Mitigation (HSIP), Eastvale, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Jurupa Valley, Flashing Yellow Arrow Signal Modifications - 10 Intersections, Jurupa Valley, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Jurupa Valley, Pedley Road at Jurupa Road Intersection Improvements, Jurupa Valley, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Rancho Mirage, Traffic Signal Interconnect Improvements (HSIP), Rancho Mirage, CA – Project Engineer Tim Chan, P.E.
Role on Project: Background Research
Title in Firm: Senior Professional I
Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California
Polytechnic University, Pomona
> Professional Engineer in
California #85687
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 27
Darryl has been conducting transportation safety for more than 15 years.
His focus is multimodal transportation planning and system development including neighborhood traffic calming, transit accessibility, bicycle and pedestrian mobility, traffic safety, and sustainability. His experience ranges from statewide assessment and policy advising, regional support for long range transportation planning, and local goals and priority setting. He builds plans to be accessible for the public and decision-makers, using a robust analytical framework founded in defensible data science. Darryl is experienced working with the public to provide education on transportation planning opportunities and trade-offs, building consensus and incorporating feedback with the empirical findings to achieve a plan that is both data driven and community based.
Relevant Experience
) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Planner ) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Project Manager ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Planner ) City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA – Project Planner ) City of Moreno Valley Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Audits, Moreno Valley, CA – Project Planner ) City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA – Project Planner
) County of Ventura, Local Road Safety Plan, Ventura County, CA – Project Manager ) City of Ventura, SSAR, Ventura, CA – Project Manager
) City of Corona, Development of LRSP, Corona, CA – Lead Project Planner ) City of Eastvale, SSAR Eastvale, CA – Project Manager ) City of Lancaster, SSARP, Lancaster, CA – Project Manager ) City of Simi Valley, LRSP, Simi Valley, CA – Project Planner ) City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA – Project Planner ) Caltrans, SHSP, Statewide, CA – Project Planner
) Caltrans, Safety Performance Measurement Baseline and Dashboard, Statewide, CA – Project Planner ) City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSAR, Goleta, CA – Project Planner ) City of Goleta, LRSP, Goleta, CA – Project Planner
) County of San Benito Unified LRSP, San Benito County, CA – Project Manager ) County of San Joaquin, SSAR, San Joaquin County, CA – Project Planner ) City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA – Project Manager
) City of Menifee LRSP, Menifee, CA – Project Manager
) City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA – Project Planner ) City of Palmdale, Sustainable Transportation Plan, Palmdale, CA – Project Manager ) City of Imperial Beach, LRSP, Imperial Beach, CA – Project Planner ) County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA – Project Planner ) City of Artesia, LRSP, Artesia, CA – Project Manager
) City of La Quinta, SSAR, La Quinta, CA – Project Planner Darryl dePencier, AICP, GISP, RSP2B
Role on Project: Outreach
Title in Firm: Associate
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science, Urban
Spatial Analytics, University
of Pennsylvania
> Bachelor of Arts, Geography,
Carleton University, Ottawa
> Certificate, Geographic
Information Systems, Algonquin
College, Ottawa
> American Institute of Certified
Planners #026552
> Geographic Information Systems
Professional #59317
> Road Safety Professional 2
Behavioral (RSP2) #17
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 28
Matt has experience in traffic engineering, transportation planning, and traffic safety analysis. His specialties include traffic signal operations and design, on-call traffic engineering, traffic impact analysis, and parking analysis. Most recently, he worked on two traffic signal synchronization projects in Orange County, specifically Barranca TSSP in Irvine, Santa Ana, and Fountain Valley, and Aliso Creek TSSP in the cities of Laguna Woods, Aliso Viejo, and Laguna Niguel. Matt has experience in data collection and field review, traffic signal timing optimization, traffic management center (TMC) and controller cabinet timing implementation, fine-tuning, and corridor before and after studies.
Relevant Experience
) City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Ventura, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure and Transportation Related Amenities, Civil Engineering Design Services, Ventura, CA – Project Engineer
) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Agoura Hills, Traffic Signal Design at Thousand Oaks Boulevard/Argos Street, Agoura Hills, CA – Analyst ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Project Engineer ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway Signal System Improvements Project, Malibu, CA – Analyst ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway Mobility Improvements at Various Locations, Malibu, CA – Analyst ) City of South Gate, As-Needed Engineering Services, South Gate, CA – Assistant Traffic Engineer ) OCTA, Aliso Creek Road Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Multiple Cities, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, El Toro Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, Chapman Avenue Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Multiple Cities, CA – Analyst ) City of Irvine, Barranca Parkway Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Irvine, CA – Analyst ) City of Los Angeles, Consolidated Rent-A-Car Off-Site Traffic Signal and Signing and Striping Improvements, Los Angeles, CA – Analyst
) City of Santa Clarita, ITS Multi-Phase Improvements, Santa Clarita, CA –Project Engineer ) City of Oxnard, Landing at Riverpark Traffic Signal Design, Oxnard, CA – Analyst ) City of Rancho Mirage, Design of Traffic Signal Interconnect Improvements City Projects, Rancho Mirage, CA – Analyst ) City of Lancaster, Lancaster Health District Traffic Impact Analysis and Signing and Striping and Traffic Signal Plans, Lancaster, CA – Analyst
Matt Stewart, P.E.
Role on Project: Toolkit/Documentation
Title in Firm: Professional I
Professional Credentials
> Master of Science in Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Berkeley
> Bachelor of Science,
Civil and Environmental
Engineering, University of
California, Los Angeles
> Professional Engineer in
California #90465
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 29
public works facilities throughout Southern California. His experience spans a wide range of areas, including roadway geometrics, pavement rehabilitation, complete streets and active transportation, traffic calming, pedestrian and bicycle safety and accessibility, water, sewer and storm drain replacements, stage construction and traffic control, traffic signing/striping, and construction support. Justin has prior experience working in the public sector as a project manager, which has given him a dual perspective on administrating and managing project. Justin also has extensive experience with Caltrans District 7, including encroachment permitting, federal funding administration through local assistance, and full design oversight related to the preparation of PSRPDS, PA/ED, and PS&E documents.
Relevant Experience
) City of Los Angeles, Griffith Park Safety and Active Transportation Improvements Project, Los Angeles, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Civil/Roadway Lead ) City of Alhambra, 710 North Arterial/I-10 Interchange Improvement Concepts, Alhambra, CA – Deputy Project Manager ) City of Camarillo, Pleasant Valley Road Bike Lanes PA&ED and PS&E, Camarillo, CA – QC/QA ) City of Los Angeles, Broadway-Manchester Active Transportation Equity Project, Los Angeles, CA – QC/QA ) City of Lancaster, On-Call Roadway and Structures; Traffic Engineering; and Drainage, Hydrology, and Hydraulic Engineering, Lancaster, CA – QC/QA
) City of Agoura Hills, Agoura Road Widening Project, Agoura Hills, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Camarillo, Santa Rosa Road Widening Camarillo, CA – Project Engineer ) City of Torrance, Crenshaw Boulevard Rehabilitation (182nd Street to Redondo Beach Boulevard), I-147, Torrance, CA – Project Manager*
) City of Torrance, Sepulveda Boulevard Rehabilitation (Hawthorne Boulevard to Western Avenue), I-172, Torrance, CA – Project Manager*
) City of Torrance, Anza Avenue Rehabilitation (Sepulveda Boulevard to Del Amo Boulevard), I-144, Torrance, CA – Project Manager*
) City of Torrance, Residential Street Rehabilitation (Area A), I-94, Torrance, CA – Project Manager* ) City of Torrance, Downtown Torrance Active Transportation Improvements, I-135, Torrance, CA – Project Manager* ) City of Torrance, Torrance School Safety and Accessibility Program, I-188, Torrance, CA – Project Manager* ) City of Torrance, Del Amo 5 Relief Sewer (Hawthorne Boulevard), I-76, Torrance, CA – Project Manager* ) City of Torrance, Water Main Replacement (242nd Street, Hawthorne Boulevard, Crenshaw Boulevard), I-153, Torrance, CA – Project Manager*
*Performed prior to joining Kimley-Horn
Justin Gatza, P.E.
Role on Project: Toolkit/Documentation
Title in Firm: Professional II
Justin brings over 12 years of professional civil engineering experience leading and supporting the planning, design, and construction of numerous Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona
> Professional Engineer in
California #83496
Professional Affiliations
> American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), Member
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 30
Tiffany has experience in traffic engineering and transportation planning. Her experience includes conducting before/after studies and traffic signal timing and synchronization. She has worked with ATMS such as Econolite’s Centracs and Siemens’ Tactics and has assisted in network configuration using Etherwan switches. Her experience also includes working with ASC/3 and SEPAC softwares, 2070 traffic controllers, CCTV cameras, changeable message signs, and video detection. Tiffany has conducted before/after studies and developed optimized signal timing plans for corridor analyses and traffic signal synchronization projects along Aliso Creek Road and Barranca Parkway in Orange County. Most recently, Tiffany has provided support for multiple on-call services, including the development of signal warrants, bicycle lane conceptual plans, corridor analyses, and traffic calming measures.
Relevant Experience
) City of Laguna Niguel, Traffic Manual and Neighborhood Traffic Management, Laguna Niguel, CA – Analyst ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Analyst ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Analyst ) City of Irvine, Barranca Parkway Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst ) City of Laguna Niguel, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Laguna Niguel, CA – Analyst ) City of Laguna Niguel, Travel Time Study, Laguna Niguel, CA – Analyst ) City of Malibu, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Civil and Traffic Engineering Services, Malibu CA – Analyst ) OCTA, Aliso Creek Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, El Toro Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst ) City of Anaheim, Traffic Management Center (TMC) Daily and Special Event Staffing, Anaheim, CA – Intern* *Performed prior to joining Kimley-Horn
Tiffany Barie, EIT
Role on Project: Background Research
Title in Firm: Analyst I
Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, California State
University, Long Beach
> Engineer-in-Training #173650
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 31
Kyle has more than seven years of experience in the traffic safety field.
His experience providing engineering design support includes crash and roadway analyses, document review, and data collection. Kyle has also been involved in the implementation of Goods Movement, Connected Vehicle, and Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) projects in Southern California, where he utilized ArcGIS and design skills to prepare reports and maps of ITS infrastructure improvements. He is proficient with Synchro, Adobe Creative Suite, and SPSS.
Relevant Experience
) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Master Plan, Lancaster, CA – Project Planner ) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Project Planner ) City of Compton LRSP, Compton, CA – Project Manager
) City of Seal Beach, LRSP, Seal Beach, CA – Analyst
) City of Anaheim, LRSP, Anaheim, CA – Project Planner
) City of Costa Mesa, LRSP, Costa Mesa, CA – Project Planner ) City of Chino, LRSP, Chino, CA – Project Manager
) City of Chino, Citywide E&TS, Chino, CA – Project Manager ) City of Chino, On-Call Traffic Engineering, Chino CA – Analyst ) City of Culver City, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Culver City, CA – Analyst ) City of Downey, On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Downey, CA – Analyst ) City of Santa Clarita, ITS Phase VII, Santa Clarita, CA – Analyst ) City of Palm Desert, Traffic Operations On-Call, Palm Desert, CA – Analyst ) City of Palm Springs, TMC Troubleshooting and Timing Plan Review, Palm Springs, CA – Deputy Project Manager ) City of Goleta, Traffic Safety Study for the SSARP/LRSP, Goleta, CA – Analyst ) City of Corona, Development of LRSP, Corona, CA – Project Planner ) City of Eastvale, SSAR, Eastvale, CA – Analyst
) City of Perris, LRSP, Perris, CA – Analyst
) City of Monterey Park, LRSP, Monterey Park, CA – Project Manager ) City of Santa Clarita, SSAR, Santa Clarita, CA – Analyst ) City of Santa Clarita, LRSP, Santa Clarita, CA – Analyst ) City of Palm Desert, LRSP, Palm Desert, CA – Analyst
) County of Imperial, SSAR for Varied Roadways, Imperial County, CA – Analyst ) City of Indio, LRSP, Indio, CA – Analyst
) County of Mono, SSAR, Mono County, NV – Analyst
) LA Metro, Arterial ITS Inventory Tool Expansion (ITS First), Los Angeles County, CA – Analyst ) LA Metro, Los Angeles County Regional ITS Architecture (RITSA) Update, Los Angeles, CA – Analyst ) San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego and Western Riverside Counties Regional Park and Ride Strategy, San Diego/Western, Riverside, CA – Analyst
Kyle McGowan, AICP
Role on Project: Outreach
Title in Firm: Professional II
Professional Credentials
> Master of Urban Planning,
University of Southern California
> Bachelor of Science, Urban
and Regional Planning,
University of Arizona
> American Institute of Certified
Planners #33483
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 32
Rossina has more than 23 years of experience as a transportation analyst. In her role, Rossina has gained extensive experience in signal synchronization timing (over 450 intersections) and local intersection timing plans. In addition to signal design, Rossina has experience with BI Trans and Econolite Systems. Rossina is also fluent in Spanish and has experience in conducting public outreach and providing translation/interpretation services Relevant Experience
) City of Bakersfield, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, Bakersfield, CA – Analyst/Translation Support ) City of Malibu, Point Dume Area Traffic Calming Study Toolkit Development, Malibu, CA – Analyst ) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Analyst ) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Analyst ) City of Diamond Bar, Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan (NTMP) on North Del Sol Lane and Highland Valley Road, Diamond Bar, CA – Analyst
) City of Anaheim, Anaheim Housing Element, Anaheim, CA – Analyst/Translation Support ) San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG), Active Transportation Program Grant Writing and Public Outreach Services, Irwindale, CA – Analyst/Translation Support
) City of Los Angeles BOE, Broadway-Manchester Active Transportation Equity Project, Los Angeles, CA – Analyst ) City of Orange, 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, Orange, CA – Outreach and Engagement ) City of Chino, 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, Chino, CA – Outreach and Engagement/Translation Support ) City of Pico Rivera, Housing Element Update, Pico Rivera, CA – Outreach and Engagement/Translation Support ) City of Solana Beach, Housing and Safety Element Update and Environmental Assessment, Solana Beach, CA – Outreach and Engagement
) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Traffic Signal Design and Flashing Yellow Arrow Modifications, Rancho Cucamonga, CA – Analyst
) City of La Canada Flintridge, HSIP Foothill Boulevard Traffic Signal Improvements, La Canada Flintridge, CA – Designer ) City of La Canada Flintridge, Evaluation of Traffic Signal Operations for Foothill Boulevard and Angeles Crest Highway, La Canada Flintridge, CA – Project Manager
) City of Oxnard, Oxnard Boulevard/Saviers Road Traffic Signal Improvements, Oxnard, CA – Designer ) City of Agoura Hills, Kanan Road/Agoura Road Intersection Improvements, Agoura Hills, CA – CADD Designer ) City of Malibu, Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) Signal System Improvements, Malibu, CA – CADD Designer ) City of Lancaster, At-Grade Rail Crossing Improvements (Avenue K, J, M, G), Lancaster, CA – Designer ) City of Lancaster, Avenue M Interchange Improvements PS&E, Lancaster, CA – Designer ) Orange County, Newport / Orange County Fiber Design, Newport Beach, CA – CADD Designer Rossina Chichiri
Role on Project: Outreach
Title in Firm: Senior Technical Support
Professional Credentials
> Associate of Arts, Business
Administration/Liberal
Arts, Mexico City
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 33
Angelo has assisted with various design, analysis, and operations projects throughout his time at Kimley-Horn as an analyst. Angelo has been involved with projects that include fiber design, traffic signal design, temporary traffic control, signing and striping design, street lighting design, pavement rehabilitation, and signal timing operations and analysis for intersections in Los Angeles, Ventura, and Orange counties. He was recently involved in the design and data collection for traffic signal synchronization projects in Irvine, Laguna Niguel, and Laguna Hills. Angelo is proficient in AutoCAD & Synchro.
Relevant Experience
) City of Agoura Hills, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - On-Call Traffic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CAfic Engineering Services, Agoura Hills, CA – Analyst
) City of Hawthorne, Various Traffic Calming Tasks - Traffic Engineering On-Call, Hawthorne, CA – Analyst ) City of Los Angeles, Broadway-Manchester Active Transportation Program, Los Angeles, CA – Analyst ) City of Oxnard, Oxnard Boulevard and Saviers Road Signal Improvements, Oxnard, CA – Analyst ) City of Rancho Cucamonga, Traffic Signal Design and Flashing Yellow Arrow Modifications, Rancho Cucamonga, CA – Analyst
) City of Ventura, Design of Traffic Signal Communication System Upgrade Project Phase 1, Ventura, CA – Analyst ) OCTA, El Toro Road Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Orange County, CA – Analyst ) City of Irvine, Barranca Parkway Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project, Irvine, CA – Analyst ) City of Lancaster, Safe Routes To School, Lancaster, CA – Analyst ) City of Lancaster, Lancaster Health District Traffic Improvements, Lancaster, CA – Analyst Angelo Pastelin, EIT
Role on Project: Toolkit/Documentation
Title in Firm: Analyst II
Professional Credentials
> Bachelor of Science, Civil
Engineering, University of
California, Irvine
> Engineer-in-Training in
California #167287
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 34
CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION
BARRY WAITE RYAN SMOOT
BILL UPHOFF CITY MANAGER
JAMES GAZELEY
CINDY SEGAWA
MARK WARONEK
CITY OF LOMITA
CITY HALL OFFICES • 24300 NARBONNE AVENUE, LOMITA • CALIFORNIA 90717 (310) 325-7110 • FAX (310) 325-4024 • www.lomitacity.com
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC CALMING TOOLKIT
Response to Questions
DATE: March 10, 2023
TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE PARTICIPANTS
SUBJECT: CLARIFICATIONS TO THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Please note the following changes and/or additions to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the project indicated above. The bidder shall execute the certification at the end of this addendum and shall attach the executed addendum to the documents submitted with the proposal.
QUESTIONS
The following are responses to questions received from prospective proposers.
Location Question Response
Various Does the Prime Consultant have
to be a Civil Engineering firm?
The City desires a Civil
Engineering Firm with experience
in traffic engineering. If the Prime
Consultant is not a Civil
Engineering firm, then key
personnel making
recommendations regarding traffic
elements would need to be Civil
Engineers.
Section IV, B Past Experience with Similar
Projects, is the list of specific
experience in the project design
area referencing experience
with bike/pedestrian/hiking trail
master plans in general or with
the City of Lomita specifically?
The requested experience is with
traffic engineering, traffic
standards, and facilitating a public
workshop. The experience would
not need to be specific to Lomita
but with other cities, counties, or
relevant entities.
Appendix 3. Acknowledgement of Response to Questions Addendum Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 35
Section II, A,
II
Can the City clarify if resumes
are required only for
key/principal team members or
all proposed team members? If
resumes are required for all
team members, would it be
acceptable to place nonkey/non-principal team member
resumes in an appendix?
Resumes should be included for
key/principal team members,
including all those who would be
in contact with City staff or present
at workshops with the public. The
proposer may include appendices
for excess resumes.
n/a Can the City confirm the type of
funding for the project, as well
as if the City is requiring rates
to be auditable and broken
down by firms direct rate and
ICR, or if fully loaded billing
rates are acceptable for the
fee?
At this time, the anticipated funds
for this project are City General
Funds. Fully-loaded billing rates
may be used for the fee proposal.
Section II, A,
IV.
Will the City please confirm that
the fee proposal is to be
submitted in a separate email?
It may be submitted as a separate
file in a single email or as a
separate email.
Section II, A,
I.
Given the one page limit for the
cover letter, would it be
acceptable to put full contract
exceptions in an appendix and
a condensed version in the
cover letter?
It will be acceptable to include
Exceptions to the Contract as an
Appendix and this should be
clearly stated in the Cover Letter.
n/a Does the City have an
anticipated budget for this
project?
The budget is not provided.
&HUWLILHGE\
6ULNDQWK&KDNUDYDUWK\3(7(9LFH3UHVLGHQW
.LPOH\+RUQDQG$VVRFLDWHV,QF
E\
KDNUDYDUWK\3(7(
The entirety of this proposal, including text and images, is the property of Kimley-Horn and Assocates, Inc., protected under U.S. copyright law.
Copyright © 2023 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
[email protected]
562.549.2186
245 E 3rd St.
Long Beach, CA 90802
CONTACT
Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E.
www.kimley-horn.com
Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit
Proposal for
City of Lomita TRTO96005.2023 1
IV FEE PROPOSAL
March 16, 2023
RE: Proposal for Engineering Services for a Traffic Calming Toolkit Dear Members of the Selection Committee:
Per the instructions in the City’s RFP, we have provided our fee proposal in a separate email, clearly marked with the following subject:
Fee Proposal for: Traffic Calming Toolkit. We welcome the opportunity to discuss our fee proposal with the City and are flexible to adjustments and refinements as necessary to better accommodate your needs. We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact our project manager Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E. directly at 562.549.2186, by email at [email protected], or at the address listed above. We look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Laura Forinash, P.E., T.E. Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E.
Project Manager/Associate Principal-in-Charge/Vice President* *As Vice President of Kimley-Horn, Sri Chakravarthy, P.E., T.E., is authorized to sign on behalf of Kimley-Horn and to bind Kimley-Horn in a contract. Sri can be reached at our Downtown Los Angeles office at 660 South Figueroa Street Suite 2050, Los Angeles, CA 90017, via email at [email protected], or at 213.261.4037.
City of Lomita – Public Works
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
To From
245 E. 3rd Street
Long Beach, CA 90802
TEL 562.549.2186
Name
Laura Forinash Sri Chakravarthy Sowmya Chandrasekhar
Category/Title
Project Manager/
Professional II
Principal-inCharge/
Sr. Professional II
QA/QC/
Sr. Professional I
Billing Rate $240.00 $330.00 $295.00 $240.00 $215.00 $190.00 $165.00 $180.00 $135.00 Total Hours Total Cost Task 1 93 4 4 5 25 $ 5,645.00
1.1 51 2 2 10 $ 2,440.001.2 21 2 2 7 $ 1,720.001.3 21 58 $ 1,485.00 Task 2 14 9 30 65 118 $ 23,940.00
2.1 22 5 25 34 $ 6,395.002.2 2 2 10 10 24 $ 5,120.002.3 10 5 15 30 60 $ 12,425.00 Task 3 15 3 15 30 15 78 $ 17,340.00
3.1 51 5 10 5 26 $ 5,780.003.2 51 5 10 5 26 $ 5,780.003.3 51 5 10 5 26 $ 5,780.00 Task 4 17 13 35 60 10 5 140 $ 29,315.00
4.1 2 35 10 10 30 $ 6,140.004.2 15 10 30 50 5 110 $ 23,175.00 55 6 22 49 69 60652510 361
$ 13,200.00 $ 1,980.00 $ 6,490.00 $ 11,760.00 $ 14,835.00 $ 11,400.00 $ 10,725.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 76,240.00 $ 800.00
$ 800.00
$ 77,040.00
City of Lomita
Traffic Calming Toolkit
March 16, 2023
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Professional II Professional I Analyst II Analyst I Sr. Technical Support Support Staff Community Workshops/Public MeetingsGeneral Project Administration & MeetingsMeetingsScheduleProject AdministrationReview Background Studies and PlansLiterature ReviewPolicy Framework ReviewTraffic Calming MatrixWorkshop #1Workshop #2City Council MeetingProject DocumentationCase StudiesTraffic Calming Report
TOTAL HOURS
Subtotal Labor:
Other Direct Costs
Workshop Materials
TOTAL COST: