1 CITY OF LOMITA
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
TO: City Council Item No. 7p
FROM: Ryan Smoot, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Carla Dillon, P.E., Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Agreement for the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the City of Los Angeles, the City of Carson, the City of El Segundo, the City of Hawthorne, the City of Inglewood, the City of Lawndale, the City of Lomita, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the County of Los Angeles, and the South Bay Cities Council of Governments regarding the administration and cost sharing for implementing the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) and Watershed Management Program (WMP) for the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area; authorize the Mayor to sign the MOA; and authorize Lomita’s estimated share of the funding, $269,802 over three years.
BACKGROUND
The Municipal Separate Storm Water System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge and Elimination (NPDES) Permit was originally adopted by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), on November 8, 2012. An updated order was issued on July 23, 2021. The MS4 Permit contains many requirements for a Watershed Management Program (WMP), Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP), and on-going reporting.
On June 16, 2014, the City Council authorized the submittal of a Letter of Intent to the Regional Board to join the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Group, which was pursuing an EWMP for the Dominguez Channel Watershed. The Dominguez Channel WMP group includes the cities of Los Angeles, Hawthorne, El Segundo, Inglewood, Lomita, Lawndale, Carson, and the County of Los Angeles. The Enhanced WMP plan was approved by the Regional Board on April 21, 2016 and identifies potential 2 project locations and Best Management Practices (BMPs), and serves as a road map to improve water quality in the watershed.
Another component of the WMP plan is to implement the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) for the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area, including Machado Lake to which the City of Lomita discharges storm water. The CIMP is necessary as it provides compliance with all the specific monitoring requirements of the MS4 Permit, including:
• Assessing the chemical, physical, and biological impacts of discharges from the MS4 Permit on receiving waters,
• Assessing compliance with receiving water limitations and water quality-based effluent limitations established to implement Total Maximum Daily Load wet weather and dry weather waste load allocations,
• Characterizing pollutant loads in MS4 Permit discharges, • Identifying sources of pollutants in MS4 Permit discharges, and • Measuring and improving the effectiveness of pollutant controls implemented under the MS4 Permit.
Many of these activities require services of trained and skilled professionals who perform sampling on short notice during rain events. Pooling resources to collectively perform these services is critical for Lomita to comply with the regulations.
On April 5, 2016, the City approved the initial MOA outlining the roles and responsibilities of all the agencies in administering the CIMP and approving the City’s share of costs for program implementation for FY 2015-16 through FY 2017-18. On April 17, 2018, the City approved an MOA covering fiscal years 2018-19 through 2022-23.
The current proposed MOA outlines the costs for implementation of the WMP and CIMP for FY 2023-24 through FY 2025-26. As in the previous MOAs, the City of Los Angeles is designated as the lead agency and will administer the compliance monitoring required by the CIMP and other WMP related tasks. Additionally, the South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) will continue to administer collection of each member agency’s share of the cost of program implementation.
OPTIONS:
1. Approve staff’s recommendation.
2. Provide alternate direction
3 FISCAL IMPACT
The table below indicates the annual costs to the City as indicated in Exhibit B of the MOA.
FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 Total
$88,802 $85,083 $95,917 $269,802
The funding source for these expenses is proposed to be funded using local Municipal return from the Safe Clean Water funds.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Memorandum of Agreement
Reviewed by: Approved by:
Gary Y. Sugano Ryan Smoot
Assistant City Manager City Manager
Prepared by:
______________
Carla Dillon, PE
Public Works Director
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF CARSON, THE CITY OF EL
SEGUNDO, THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, THE CITY OF INGLEWOOD, THE CITY OF
LAWNDALE, THE CITY OF LOMITA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT, THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, AND THE SOUTH BAY
CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR IMPLEMENTING
THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM (CIMP) AND
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (WMP)
FOR THE DOMINGUEZ CHANNEL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA
This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), including its attachments, exhibits and schedules, is made and entered into as of July 1st, 2023 by and between THE SOUTH BAY CITIES COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SBCCOG), a California Joint Powers Authority, and THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (CITY), a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF CARSON, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF EL SEGUNDO, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF HAWTHORNE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF INGLEWOOD, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF LAWNDALE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF LOMITA, a municipal corporation, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (LACFCD), a body corporate and politic, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (COUNTY), a political subdivision of the State of California. Collectively, these entities shall be known herein as PARTIES or individually as PARTY.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Board) have classified the Greater Los Angeles County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) as a large MS4 pursuant to 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 122.26(b)(4) and a major facility pursuant to 40 CFR section 122.2; and WHEREAS, the Regional Board adopted the 2012 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit Order No. R4-2012-0175 on November 8, 2012, which was re-adopted in the 2021 Regional Phase I MS4 Permit Order No. R4- 2021-0105; and
WHEREAS, the 2012 MS4 Permit became effective on December 28, 2012, and required that LACFCD, the COUNTY, and 84 of the 88 cities within Los Angeles County comply with its prescribed elements; and
Attachment No. 1
WHEREAS the 2021 MS4 Permit became effective on September 11, 2021, superseding the 2012 MS4 Permit, and requires that LACFCD, the COUNTY, 85 cities within the coastal watersheds of Los Angeles County, Ventura County Watershed Protection District, the County of Ventura, and 10 cities within Ventura County comply with its prescribed elements; and
WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identifies the PARTIES as MS4 permittees responsible for compliance with the MS4 Permit requirements pertaining to the PARTIES’ collective jurisdictional area in the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area as identified in Exhibit D of this MOA; and WHEREAS, the CITY and the cities of Carson, El Segundo, Hawthorne, Inglewood, Lawndale, Lomita, and LACFCD and the COUNTY formed the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Group (DC WMG) to collaborate on the CIMP and the WMP in accordance with the MS4 Permit, and the CITY serves as the DC WMG Lead Agency; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to have the SBCCOG: (a) invoice and collect funds from each of the PARTIES to cover the costs of MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS and pay the CITY; (b) perform tasks identified in CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION in Exhibit A of this MOA; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to collaborate on the development of a WMP and CIMP in accordance with the MS4 Permit for a portion of the Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area as identified in Exhibit D of this MOA to comply with all applicable monitoring requirements of the MS4 Permit; and WHEREAS, the WMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on June 25, 2015, and was approved by the Regional Board on April 20, 2016; and WHEREAS, a revised WMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on June 29, 2021 and is pending approval; and
WHEREAS, the first CIMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on April 18, 2016, and was approved by the Regional Board on July 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, a revised CIMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on March 11, 2023 and is pending approval; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to cooperatively share and fully fund the estimated costs of the implementation of the CIMP and WMP; and WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that each shall assume full and independent responsibility for ensuring its own compliance with the MS4 Permit notwithstanding this MOA; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to have the SBCCOG: (a) invoice and collect funds from each of the PARTIES to cover the cost of MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS and pay the CITY; (b) perform tasks identified in CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION in Exhibit A of this MOA;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOA, the PARTIES agree as follows:
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and fully incorporated into this MOA.
Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOA is to cooperatively fund the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS, as set forth in Exhibit A of this MOA.
Section 3. Cooperation. The PARTIES shall fully cooperate with one another to attain the purposes of this MOA.
Section 4. Voluntary. The PARTIES have voluntarily entered into this MOA for the implementation of the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS and authorize the SBCCOG to administer the cost-sharing.
Section 5. Term. This MOA shall become effective on July 1, 2023 and shall remain in effect for three (3) years up to and including June 30, 2026. The MOA may be extended, through mutual agreement of the PARTIES.
Section 6. Commitment. Once effective, the PARTIES agree to uphold the promises contained in this MOA for the duration of the agreed upon term. The PARTIES agree that costs, expenses, fees, liabilities, and obligations incurred by the CITY in performing MONITORING SERVICES in accordance with Tables 2-2D(i) of Exhibit B and WMPRELATED TASKS in accordance with Tables 3-3B of Exhibit B prior to the execution date of this MOA but after July 1, 2023, shall be cost-shared under this Agreement according to the amounts specified in Exhibit B and shall be included in the first invoice.
Section 7. THE PARTIES AGREE:
a. Monitoring Services. The CITY will perform the MONITORING SERVICES as defined in Exhibit A.
b. WMP-Related Tasks. The CITY and the SBCCOG will perform the WMPRELATED TASKS, as defined in Exhibit A. c. Reporting. Each PARTY hereto authorizes the CITY to prepare and submit reports to the Regional Board as required by the MS4 Permit. In addition, the CITY will submit to the PARTIES the data used to prepare the reports. This data
will be transmitted electronically to all PARTIES and as requested by the Regional Board. The CITY will provide sufficient time to the PARTIES to review the prepared reports. The CITY shall consider incorporating such comments received and answering a PARTY’s questions to the best of its abilities prior to its submittal to the Regional Board.
d. Contract Administration. The SBCCOG will be responsible for CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION, as defined in Exhibit A.
e. Communication. To the extent the PARTIES have communications related to CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION as defined in Exhibit A, such communications shall be directed to the SBCCOG. Communications concerning MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS under this Agreement shall be directed to the DC WMG Lead Agency. Written notice will be provided to the PARTIES should contact information from the SBCCOG and/or the DC WMG Lead Agency change.
f. Contracting. The PARTIES contemplate that other individual NPDES permit holders may wish to participate in the MONITORING SERVICES without being a PARTY to this MOA. In the event that another NPDES permittee wants to participate in the MONITORING SERVICES, the SBCCOG may enter into an individual separate agreement with such individual NPDES permittee. The individual NPDES permittee will not become a PARTY to this MOA but will be responsible for its proportionate share of the costs for those MONITORING SERVICES. If other individual NPDES permit holders’ participation modifies the PARTIES’ proportionate cost share, each PARTY’s proportional payment obligation shall be modified administratively in Exhibit B.
Section 8. Invoicing and Payment
a. Invoicing. The SBCCOG will invoice all PARTIES, except the CITY, annually in amounts not exceeding the invoice amounts shown in Table 1 of Exhibit B. The annual invoices will be issued by the SBCCOG to the PARTIES in July of each calendar year for their proportional share of the estimated cost for MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS, including SBCCOG’s Contract Management Fee, for the fiscal year, as shown in Table 1 of Exhibit B. The first invoice will be issued in July 2023 or upon the execution of this Agreement, whichever is later. The PARTIES hereby acknowledge and ratify services performed on or after the earlier of July 1st, 2023 or the date of the last signature of the PARTIES that are performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the MOA. Such services shall be included in the first invoice and reimbursable pursuant to this MOA. The CITY will invoice the SBCCOG for tasks performed, deducting the CITY’s cost portion for such tasks and the CITY’s cost portion for the SBCCOG’s Contract Management Fee. The CITY shall provide SBCCOG an
accounting of the MONITORING SERVICES, and any WMP-RELATED TASKS completed during each annual payment term consistent with the format as shown in Exhibit E.
b. Annual Payment. Each PARTY, excluding the CITY, shall pay the SBCCOG for their invoice within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice from the SBCCOG. c. Late Payment Penalty. Any payment that is not received within sixty (60) days following receipt of the invoice from SBCCOG shall be subject to a late payment of 10%. Interest on any late payments shall accrue at the rate of 1% per month for each month a payment is past due.
d. Delinquent Payments. A payment not made within three hundred and sixty-five (365) days after receipt of the invoice from the SBCCOG shall result in the SBCCOG notifying the Regional Board and the PARTIES that the delinquent PARTY is no longer a participating member of the CIMP or WMP. The PARTY shall be deemed to have withdrawn from this MOA and the remaining PARTIES' cost share allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the cost allocation formula in Table 1 of Exhibit B. Withdrawal shall not relieve a PARTY’s obligation to pay its proportionate share of costs that were due at the time of the deemed withdrawal.
e. Contingency. Each PARTY’s annual invoice will include a contingency of fifteen percent (15%) for MONITORING SERVICES and fifteen percent (15%) for WMPRELATED TASKS, as shown in Table 1 of Exhibit B. Contingency funds will be held by SBCCOG until such time as they are needed. Contingency funds that are used will be applied to each PARTY based on its proportional share. No PARTY will be obligated to pay for additional expenditures which exceed its contingency amounts without an amendment to this MOA.
i. Monitoring Services Contingency. The CITY shall have access to the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency, for paying for or otherwise implementing the MONITORING SERVICES defined in Exhibit A of this MOA. The CITY shall notify the PARTIES before use of the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency is appropriate or required as soon as practicable, but any failure to notify any PARTY or the PARTIES shall not alter, eliminate, or affect the CITY’s right to payment. The CITY will indicate the amount of MONITORING SERVICES Contingency used in its applicable invoice(s) to the SBCCOG for implementation of the MONITORING SERVICES. Should the CITY determine in its reasonable discretion that the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency not be necessary for MONITORING SERVICES, the PARTIES may administratively shift these funds to be used for WMP-RELATED TASKS and do so using the process defined in Section 9(c).
ii. WMP-Related Tasks Contingency. The PARTIES may utilize WMPRELATED TASKS Contingency to complete projects consistent with the WMP-RELATED TASKS defined in Exhibit A. To utilize WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency, the DC WMG shall discuss the proposed activity and the DC WMG will come to a majority consensus, using the process defined in Section 9(c), as to whether to move forward with the use of WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency and the process for implementation.
The SBCCOG shall utilize the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency to reimburse the entity responsible for administering the approved WMPRELATED TASK funded by the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency.
Should the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency not be necessary for WMP-RELATED TASKS, the PARTIES may administratively shift these funds to be used for MONITORING SERVICES, using the process defined in Section 9(c).
f. Shifting of Funds. The PARTIES may shift funds collected under this MOA between MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS
administratively, without an amendment to this MOA, provided that the overall amount does not exceed the total not-to-exceed amount of this MOA or a PARTY’S annual proportional cost, as set forth in Table 1 of Exhibit B, and if approved by a majority consensus, using the process defined in Section 9(c).
Should the CITY require a shift in funds between MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS in order to implement the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS, it shall notify the SBCCOG before shifting these funds.
g. Contract Management Fee. The SBCCOG will receive a Contract Management Fee of $50,000 per year for administration of this MOA by the SBCCOG. Each PARTY will be assessed its proportionate share of the annual Contract Management Fee as shown in Table 4 of Exhibit B.
h. Reconciliation of this MOA. At the end of the MOA, the SBCCOG will provide the PARTIES with an accounting of actual expenditures, consistent with the format as shown in Exhibit E, within ninety (90) days. Any unexpended funds held by SBCCOG at the termination of this MOA will be rolled-over to cover expenses in any subsequent MOA. PARTIES may request in writing a refund or credit of any unexpended funds by the SBCCOG, in accordance with the distributed cost formula set forth in Table 1 of Exhibit B.
Section 9. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE:
a. Documentation. The PARTIES agree to promptly provide at no cost to the CITY all requested information and documentation in their possession that the CITY, in
its discretion, deems to be necessary or helpful for the performance of the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS.
b. Access. During the term of this MOA on an as-needed basis, each PARTY shall allow the CITY or its contractor reasonable access and entry to land, facilities and structures owned, operated, or controlled by the PARTY, which access and entry are necessary or helpful for the CITY or its contractor to perform MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS (FACILITIES). The FACILITIES shall include but not be limited to the PARTY's storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar, provided, however, that prior to entering any of the PARTIES’ FACILITIES, the CITY or its contractor, as applicable, shall provide seventy-two (72) hours’ advance written notice of entry to the applicable PARTY, or in the cases where seventy-two (72) hours’ advance written notice is not possible, such as in cases of unforeseen wet weather, the CITY or its contractor shall provide written notice to the applicable PARTY as early as reasonably possible. Any PARTY, including LACFCD, agrees to provide the CITY or its contractor a "no-fee" Access Permit to its FACILITIES. This Access Permit does not cover any fees that may be required for Construction Permits for the installation of permanent monitoring equipment. The CITY shall secure any required necessary permits prior to entry.
c. Consensus. The PARTIES agree that consensus in the DC WMG will be determined by a majority (50%) voting of the DC WMG members based on each PARTY’s percentage land area of the Watershed as shown in Exhibit D.
Consensus shall be reached using an e-mail vote of DC WMG members. Any PARTY that does not respond to a vote within five (5) business days shall be considered to support the majority consensus.
d. Participation. Each PARTY shall designate an individual to provide representation at the DC WMG that is authorized to provide official input on behalf of the PARTY. Each PARTY shall ensure that a representative attends the DC WMG meetings and, if necessary, responds to e-mail communication. e. Additional Activities. The PARTIES agree that additional activities may arise in the course of implementing this MOA, and there may be interest in utilizing funds collected through this MOA or pursuing additional funds, including but not limited to the Safe Clean Water Program, to complete those projects. The DC WMG, led by the DC WMG Lead Agency, shall discuss and determine additional activities to be completed and the implementation approach to completing those projects.
The DC WMG will determine which activities to pursue in accordance with the consensus process defined in Section 9(c). Any other PARTY that does not desire to participate in an additional activity can submit a written request to the SBCCOG that they do not desire to be part of the activity. The non-participating PARTY will not be responsible for its proportionate share of funds to complete
the additional project, and the cost will be recalculated amongst the remaining PARTIES.
Section 10. Indemnification. Each PARTY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY, on a pro rata basis, including its special districts, their member agencies, elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including, but not limited to, demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys and expert witness fees), arising from or connected with this MOA; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for that PARTY’s own negligence or willful misconduct.
Section 11. Termination
a. Noticing. Any PARTY may withdraw from this MOA for any reason, in whole or part, by giving the SBCCOG and the Regional Board thirty (30) days written notice thereof. Withdrawing PARTIES shall remain wholly responsible for their proportional share of the costs of MONITORING SERVICES and WMPRELATED TASKS for any fiscal year for which the PARTY has not withdrawn.
Withdrawing PARTIES shall not be entitled to any refunds. Each PARTY shall also be responsible for the payment of its own fines, penalties or costs incurred as a result of the non-performance of the CIMP and/or WMP. Upon withdrawal by the SBCCOG, the PARTIES shall meet and confer to designate an alternate organization to accept the SBCCOG's responsibilities under this MOA. b. Default. If a PARTY fails to comply with any of the terms or conditions of this MOA, that PARTY shall forfeit its rights to the work completed through this MOA, but no such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY has first been given notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default.
c. Equipment Ownership. Devices such as automatic sampling stations - inclusive of a cabinet, sampling equipment, ancillary devices, power supplies (EQUIPMENT) may be installed to implement the CIMP. Any PARTY voluntarily terminating membership will not be entitled to a refund for the portion of the share paid to acquire and to operate the EQUIPMENT nor for the remaining value of the EQUIPMENT, if any. The operational life of such EQUIPMENT is approximately seven years, and after which it may be obsolete or may require major remodel or replacement of electrical and mechanical components costing equivalent to a purchase of a new EQUIPMENT. The remaining PARTIES agree to own, operate and maintain and or replace the EQUIPMENT.
Section 12. General Provisions
a. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports relating to this MOA, and any request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the PARTIES at the addresses set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PARTIES shall promptly notify each other of any change of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in Exhibit C. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail or fax. A notice shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by e-mail; or (b) on the third (3rd) business day following mailing by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested) to the addresses set forth in Exhibit C. b. Administration. For the purposes of this MOA, the PARTIES and SBCCOG hereby designate as their respective representatives the persons named in Exhibit C. The designated representatives, or their respective designees, shall administer the terms and conditions of this MOA on behalf of their respective entities. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY or the SBCCOG represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOA on behalf of such entity.
c. Relationship of the Parties. The PARTIES to this MOA are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PARTY unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOA. No employee, agent, or officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another PARTY.
d. Amendment. The terms and provisions of this MOA may not be amended, modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all nondelinquent PARTIES and the SBCCOG. Such amendments may be executed by those individuals listed in Exhibit C or by a person authorized to execute such amendment on behalf of each PARTY.
e. Law to Govern. This MOA is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation related to this MOA, venue in the State Superior Court or Federal District Court shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles. f. No Presumption in Drafting. The PARTIES to this MOA agree that the general rule that an MOA is to be interpreted against the PARTY drafting it, or causing it to be prepared shall not apply.
g. Severability. If any provision of this MOA shall be determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOA shall not be affected, and this MOA shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOA. h. Entire Agreement. This MOA constitutes the entire agreement of the PARTIES to this MOA with respect to the subject matter hereof.
i. Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY to this MOA of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any PARTY to this MOA of any breach of the provisions of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOA. j. Counterparts. This MOA may be executed in any number of counterparts, which execution may be by electronic means as defined in Civil Code section 1633.2 and each of which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have been delivered to all PARTIES to this MOA. k. All PARTIES to this MOA have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOA. Accordingly, this MOA shall be construed according to its fair language.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this MOA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the PARTIES:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
Mark Pestrella, Director of Public Works Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dawyn R. Harrison
County Counsel
By
Deputy Date
LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
By
Mark Pestrella, Chief Engineer Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dawyn R. Harrison
County Counsel
By
Deputy Date
CITY OF CARSON
By
David C. Roberts
City Manager
Date
ATTEST:
By
Dr. Khaleah K. Bradshaw
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
City Attorney Date
CITY OF EL SEGUNDO
By
Darrell George
City Manager
Date
ATTEST:
By
Tracy Weaver
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Mark D. Hensley
City Attorney
Date
CITY OF LAWNDALE
By
Sean M. Moore
City Manager
Date
ATTEST:
By
Erica Harbison
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Gregory Murphy
City Attorney
Date
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Date: ___________________ By: _________________________ Aura Garcia, President
Board of Public Works
ATTEST:
_________________________
Holly Wolcott
Interim City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Hydee Feldstein Soto
City Attorney
By: _________________________
Adena M. Hopenstand
Deputy City Attorney
CITY OF HAWTHORNE
By
Vontray Norris
City Manager
Date
ATTEST:
By
Dayna Williams-Hunter
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Robert Kim
City Attorney
Date
CITY OF INGLEWOOD
By
James T. Butts, Jr.
Mayor
Date
ATTEST:
By
Aisha L. Thompson
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Kenneth R. Campos
City Attorney
Date
CITY OF LOMITA
By
Barry M. Waite
Mayor
Date
ATTEST:
By
Kathleen Horn-Gregory
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
Trevor Rusin
City Attorney
Date
South Bay Cities Council of Governments
Date: ___________________ By: _________________________
ATTEST:
By: _________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: _________________________
Counsel for the SBCCOG
EXHIBIT A
MOA Scope of Work
The purpose of this MOA is to facilitate compliance by the DC WMG with the MS4 Permit. The tasks below outline the broadly-expected work anticipated to comply with the Permit.
MONITORING SERVICES
This includes any and all tasks required to comply with the monitoring requirements established in the MS4 Permit and associated documents. This includes but is not limited to implementation of the DC CIMP (Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program), which includes but is not limited to the following activities:
• Receiving Water Monitoring
• Stormwater Outfall Monitoring
• Non-Stormwater Outfall Monitoring
• Urban Lakes Monitoring
• Data Management
• Capital, Operation, and Maintenance Activities
• Purchasing, maintaining, and replacing equipment (capital costs) necessary for monitoring activities
• Development of the monitoring sections to be included in the Annual Report (e.g., trends analysis, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) attainment, summary of monitoring activities)
• Annual Reconciliation of the MONITORING SERVICES under the MOA • This work may include additional activities and requirements based upon the March 2023 CIMP revisions, any other future CIMP revision, and subsequent requirements set by the Regional Board.
The CITY is responsible for completing the MONITORING SERVICES in this MOA, including by utilizing consultant support services.
WMP-RELATED TASKS
This includes any and all tasks required to comply with the MS4 Permit, as well as other work that is determined to advance the Parties’ efforts in complying with the MS4 Permit. The DC WMG is required to complete the following activities as part of the DC Watershed Management Program (WMP). This includes but is not limited to the sub-tasks defined below:
• Annual Reporting (including the WMP Progress Report)
• Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD)
• Adaptive Management
• WMP Revisions
• Website management (lastormh2o.org)
• California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Membership Contracts regarding WMP-RELATED TASKS will be administered by the SBCCOG utilizing a consultant(s) selected in coordination with the DC WMG, unless otherwise determined by the DC WMG. The lead agency of the DC WMG will provide subject-matter expertise and project
management support to the SBCCOG and its consultant(s) for the purposes of completing this task.
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
This includes any and all tasks associated with administering this MOA, including but not limited to the following:
• Facilitate the development of agreements and subsequent amendments for the DC WMG
• Manage procurements, contracting, and contract administration for consultants and contractors, with the DC WMG Lead Agency providing subject-matter expertise and project management support. This could include establishing and managing a bench of technical consultants that could be utilized by any Party. • Distribute invoices and collect payment from Parties
• Pay invoices from the CITY, upon receipt of invoice, as established in section 8(a) of the MOA
• Manage the MOA budget in coordination with the DC WMG Lead Agency • Facilitate the preparation of DC WMG administrative procedures by DC WMG and ensure compliance with these procedures
• Annual Reconciliation of WMP-related tasks under the MOA The CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION tasks will be completed by SBCCOG.
Additional tasks may be identified in the process of complying with the MS4 Permit, at which point the DC WMG would determine the optimal approach to ensuring that the DC WMG remains in compliance with any and all aspects of the MS4 Permit and its associated documents.
EXHIBIT B
MOA Cost Estimate Tables
Table 1. CIMP/WMP Implementation Invoicing Schedule ..................................................... 24 Table 2. Distribution of Total CIMP Implementation Costs................................................... 24 Table 2A. Distribution of Universal CIMP Costs (Shared Items) ............................... 25 Table 2A(i). Universal CIMP Costs (Shared Items).......................................................... 25 Table 2B. Distribution of Dominguez Channel Watershed Monitoring Costs ......... 26 Table 2B(i). Dominguez Channel Watershed Monitoring Costs....................................... 26 Table 2C. Distribution of Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Costs ................... 27 Table 2C(i). Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Costs................................................ 27 Table 2D. Distribution of LA Harbor Watershed Monitoring Costs........................... 28 Table 2D(i). LA Harbor Watershed Monitoring Costs....................................................... 28 Table 3. Distribution of WMP Implementation Costs ............................................................ 29 Table 3A. WMP Implementation Costs ......................................................................... 29 Table 3B. Distribution of CASQA Membership Fees .................................................. 30 Table 4. Distribution of SBCCOG Contract Management Fees............................................ 30
Table 1. CIMP/WMP Implementation Invoicing Schedule
Agency July 2023 July 2024 July 2025 Total Invoiced (3 years) Total Cost of DC MOA $1,187,607 $1,130,042 $1,471,697 $3,789,346 LACFCD $56,258 $55,291 $72,552 $184,101
City of Los Angeles $477,047 $453,843 $579,776 $1,510,666 County of Los Angeles $162,863 $154,571 $203,613 $521,047 City of Carson $249,069 $236,327 $312,456 $797,852
City of El Segundo $18,692 $17,639 $25,242 $61,573
City of Hawthorne $58,095 $54,827 $78,454 $191,376
City of Inglewood $57,980 $54,718 $78,298 $190,996
City of Lawndale $18,801 $17,743 $25,389 $61,933
City of Lomita $88,802 $85,083 $95,917 $269,802
Note:
Total Cost = Total CIMP (Table 2) + Total WMP (Table 3) + SBCCOG Fee (Table 4) Table 2. Distribution of Total CIMP Implementation Costs Agency Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Total Estimated Cost of CIMP $873,000 $842,000 $884,000 $2,599,000 LACFCD $51,113 $50,100 $52,598 $153,811
City of Los Angeles $358,996 $345,943 $363,199 $1,068,138 County of Los Angeles $115,628 $111,398 $116,956 $343,982 City of Carson $175,536 $169,117 $177,553 $522,206
City of El Segundo $11,010 $10,618 $11,149 $32,777
City of Hawthorne $34,219 $33,004 $34,651 $101,874
City of Inglewood $34,152 $32,939 $34,582 $101,673
City of Lawndale $11,075 $10,681 $11,213 $32,969
City of Lomita $81,271 $78,200 $82,099 $241,570
Note:
Total Cost = Universal Costs (Shared Items) + Dominguez Channel Watershed Costs + Machado Lake Watershed Costs + LA Harbor Costs.
Table 2A. Distribution of Universal CIMP Costs (Shared Items) Agency Area
(acres)
% of
Total
Area
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Universal Costs (shared) 50,444.88 100% $427,770 $412,580 $433,160 $1,273,510 LACFCD1-- -- $21,388 $20,629 $21,658 $63,675
City of Los Angeles 19,243.21 38.15% $155,022 $149,518 $156,976 $461,516 County of Los Angeles 7,699.69 15.26% $62,028 $59,826 $62,810 $184,664 City of Carson 11,986.38 23.76% $96,562 $93,133 $97,778 $287,473 City of El Segundo 1,252.18 2.48% $10,088 $9,729 $10,215 $30,032 City of Hawthorne 3,891.93 7.72% $31,353 $30,240 $31,748 $93,341 City of Inglewood 3,884.28 7.70% $31,292 $30,180 $31,686 $93,158 City of Lawndale 1,259.51 2.50% $10,147 $9,786 $10,274 $30,207 City of Lomita 1,227.70 2.43% $9,890 $9,539 $10,015 $29,444 1 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Universal Costs, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
Table 2A(i). Universal CIMP Costs (Shared Items)
CIMP Monitoring Component Fiscal Year 23-24 Fiscal Year 24-25 Fiscal Year 25-26 Labor $50,000 $45,000 $50,000
Laboratory Analysis $153,152 $142,642 $147,406
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $22,973 $21,396 $22,111 Laboratory Analysis –
Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIEs) $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 Contract Services $70,000 $70,000 $70,000
Equipment $18,136 $15,373 $14,082
Administrative Fee (5%) $17,713 $16,721 $17,180
Sub-Total $371,974 $351,132 $360,779
Annual Escalation (2.5%) -- $8,778 $18,264
Contingency (15%) $55,796 $52,670 $54,117
Total $427,770 $412,580 $433,160
Table 2B. Distribution of Dominguez Channel Watershed Monitoring Costs Agency Area
(acres)
% of Total
Area
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
DC Watershed
Monitoring 33,785.82 100% $26,190 $25,260 $26,520 $77,970 LACFCD1-- -- $1,309 $1,264 $1,326 $3,899
City of Los Angeles 5,986.68 38.15% $4,409 $4,252 $4,464 $13,125 County of Los Angeles 6,755.80 15.26% $4,975 $4,798 $5,038 $14,811 City of Carson 10,755.44 23.76% $7,921 $7,639 $8,020 $23,580 City of El Segundo 1,252.18 2.48% $922 $889 $934 $2,745 City of Hawthorne 3,891.93 7.72% $2,866 $2,764 $2,903 $8,533 City of Inglewood 3,884.28 7.70% $2,860 $2,759 $2,896 $8,515 City of Lawndale 1,259.51 2.50% $928 $895 $939 $2,762
1 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Dominguez Channel Watershed Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
Table 2B(i). Dominguez Channel Watershed Monitoring Costs CIMP Monitoring Component Fiscal Year 23-24 Fiscal Year 24-25 Fiscal Year 25-26 Labor $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Laboratory Analysis $9,377 $8,453 $9,020
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $1,407 $1,268 $1,353 Laboratory Analysis –
Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIEs) -- -- --
Contract Services $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Equipment $906 $753 $664
Administrative Fee (5%) $1,084 $1,024 $1,052
Sub-Total $22,774 $21,498 $22,089
Annual Escalation (2.5%) -- $537 $1,118
Contingency (15%) $3,416 $3,225 $3,313
Total $26,190 $25,260 $26,520
Table 2C. Distribution of Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Costs Agency Area
(acres)
% of Total
Area
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Machado Lake
Watershed Monitoring1
5,228.39 100% $323,883 $311,540 $327,080 $962,503
LACFCD2-- -- $16,194 $15,577 $16,354 $48,125
City of Los Angeles 1,998.43 38.22% $117,607 $113,125 $118,768 $349,500 County of Los Angeles 809.66 15.49% $47,648 $45,832 $48,119 $141,599 City of Carson 1,207.37 23.09% $71,053 $68,345 $71,755 $211,153 City of Lomita 1,212.93 23.20% $71,381 $68,661 $72,084 $212,126 Wilmington Drain Bed Sediment Monitoring
(LACFCD)3
$7,857 $8,420 $8,840 $25,117
1 Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring includes: In-Lake monitoring for the Nutrients & Toxics TMDLs, Non-Stormwater Outfall Monitoring, Stormwater Outfall Monitoring in Project 510 and 77 drains, and Dry & Wet Weather monitoring in Wilmington Drain. 2 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring cost which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
3 LACFCD is responsible for 100% of Wilmington Drain Bed Sediment Monitoring.
Table 2C(i). Machado Lake Watershed Monitoring Costs
CIMP Monitoring Component Fiscal Year 23-24 Fiscal Year 24-25 Fiscal Year 25-26 Labor $45,000 $40,000 $45,000
Laboratory Analysis $170,521 $164,065 $166,784
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $25,578 $24,610 $25,018 Laboratory Analysis –
Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIEs) -- -- --
Contract Services $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Equipment $13,634 $10,664 $9,663
Administrative Fee (5%) $13,737 $12,967 $13,323
Sub-Total $288,470 $272,306 $279,788
Annual Escalation (2.5%) -- $6,808 $14,164
Contingency (15%) $43,270 $40,846 $41,968
Total $331,740 $319,960 $335,920
Table 2D. Distribution of LA Harbor Watershed Monitoring Costs Agency Area (acres) % of Total
Area
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Total over 3
years
LA Harbor Monitoring 11,392.33 100% $87,300 $84,200 $88,400 $259,900 LACFCD1 -- -- $4,365 $4,210 $4,420 $12,995
City of Los Angeles 11,258.10 98.82% $81,958 $79,048 $82,991 $243,997 County of Los Angeles 134.23 1.18% $977 $942 $989 $2,908 1 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the LA Harbor Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
Notes:
LA Harbor Monitoring includes the cost of monitoring the Main Ship Channel (HW-07).
Monitoring for the LA Harbor Bacteria TMDL at Cabrillo Beach (CB-01 and CB-02) is the sole responsibility of City of Los Angeles.
Monitoring for the Greater Harbors portion of the Dominguez Channel Toxics TMDL is funded under a separate MOA.
The cities of Carson (23.57 ac) and Lomita (14.77 ac) have small portions of land within the LA Harbor sub-watershed; but are not included in the cost sharing.
Table 2D(i). LA Harbor Watershed Monitoring Costs
CIMP Monitoring Component Fiscal Year 23-24 Fiscal Year 24-25 Fiscal Year 25-26 Labor $10,000 $10,000 $10,000
Laboratory Analysis $54,172 $50,650 $52,281
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $8,126 $7,598 $7,842 Laboratory Analysis –
Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIEs) -- -- --
Contract Services -- -- --
Equipment -- -- --
Administrative Fee (5%) $3,615 $3,412 $3,506
Sub-Total $75,913 $71,660 $73,629
Annual Escalation (2.5%) -- $1,791 $3,727
Contingency (15%) $11,387 $10,749 $11,044
Total $87,300 $84,200 $88,400
Table 3. Distribution of WMP Implementation Costs
Agency Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Total Estimated Cost of WMP1 $264,607 $238,042 $537,697 $1,040,346 LACFCD2 $2,645 $2,691 $17,454 $22,790
City of Los Angeles $99,931 $89,780 $198,457 $388,168
County of Los Angeles $39,985 $35,923 $79,407 $155,315
City of Carson $62,246 $55,923 $123,616 $241,785
City of El Segundo $6,503 $5,842 $12,914 $25,259
City of Hawthorne $20,211 $18,158 $40,138 $78,507
City of Inglewood $20,171 $18,122 $40,059 $78,352
City of Lawndale $6,540 $5,876 $12,990 $25,406
City of Lomita $6,375 $5,727 $12,662 $24,764
1 Total Cost = WMP Implementation (Table 3A) + CASQA Membership Fees (Table 3B) 2 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of WMP Revision/RAA/Adaptive Management + Special Studies/Projects (including Program Management, Annual Escalation, and Contingency), which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
LACFCD does not participate in the cost of the other WMP components.
Table 3A. WMP Implementation Costs
WMP Component Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Semi-Annual Progress Report (June) $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $105,000 Annual Reporting Package (December)1 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $225,000 WMP Revision/RAA/Adaptive Management -- -- $215,000 $215,000 Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD) $24,000 -- -- $24,000
Special Studies/Projects $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $120,000 Program Management (15%) $26,100 $22,500 $54,750 $103,350 Sub-Total $200,100 $172,500 $419,750 $792,350
Annual Escalation (2%) -- $3,450 $16,958 $20,408
Contingency (15%) $30,015 $25,875 $62,962 $118,852
Total $230,115 $201,825 $499,670 $931,610
1 Annual Reporting Package includes semi-annual WMP Progress Report.
Table 3B. Distribution of CASQA Membership Fees
Agency1 Area
(acres)
% of Total
Area
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total over 3 years
Total CASQA Fees2 50,444.88 100% $34,492 $36,217 $38,027 $108,736 City of Los Angeles 19,243.21 38.15% $13,158 $13,816 $14,506 $41,480 County of Los Angeles 7,699.69 15.26% $5,265 $5,528 $5,804 $16,597 City of Carson 11,986.38 23.76% $8,196 $8,606 $9,035 $25,837 City of El Segundo 1,252.18 2.48% $856 $899 $944 $2,699 City of Hawthorne 3,891.93 7.72% $2,661 $2,794 $2,934 $8,389 City of Inglewood 3,884.28 7.70% $2,656 $2,789 $2,928 $8,373 City of Lawndale 1,259.51 2.50% $861 $904 $950 $2,715
City of Lomita 1,227.70 2.43% $839 $881 $926 $2,646
1 LACFCD retains its own separate CASQA membership.
2 Assumes 5% annual escalation.
Table 4. Distribution of SBCCOG Contract Management Fees Agency Area (acres) % of Total
Area
Fiscal
Year
23-24
Fiscal
Year
24-25
Fiscal
Year
25-26
Total over 3 years
Total SBCCOG Fees 50,444.88 100% $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $150,000 LACFCD1 -- -- $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $7,500
City of Los Angeles 19,243.21 38.15% $18,120 $18,120 $18,120 $54,360 County of Los Angeles 7,699.69 15.26% $7,250 $7,250 $7,250 $21,750 City of Carson 11,986.38 23.76% $11,287 $11,287 $11,287 $33,861 City of El Segundo 1,252.18 2.48% $1,179 $1,179 $1,179 $3,537 City of Hawthorne 3,891.93 7.72% $3,665 $3,665 $3,665 $10,995 City of Inglewood 3,884.28 7.70% $3,657 $3,657 $3,657 $10,971 City of Lawndale 1,259.51 2.50% $1,186 $1,186 $1,186 $3,558 City of Lomita 1,227.70 2.43% $1,156 $1,156 $1,156 $3,468 1 LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Total SBCCOG Fee, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.
EXHIBIT C
Dominguez Channel WMP/CIMP Responsible Agencies Representatives and SBCCOG Contact
Agency Address Agency Contact
City of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Bureau of Sanitation, Watershed
Protection Division
1149 S. Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Alfredo Magallanes
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (213) 485-3958
County of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Stormwater Quality Division,
Building A-9 East, 1
st Floor
900 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803-1331
Mark Lombos
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300-4665
Los Angeles County Flood Control District
Department of Public Works
Stormwater Quality Division,
Building A-9 East, 1
st Floor
900 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803-1331
Jalaine Verdiner
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300-4666
City of Carson
Office of the City Manager
701 E. Carson Street
Carson, CA 90749
David C. Roberts, City Manager
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 310-952-1730
Roland Jen
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 952-1700 ext. 1814
City of El Segundo
350 Main Street
El Segundo, CA 90245-3895
Lifan Xu
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 524-2368
City of Hawthorne
4455 West 126th Street
Hawthorne, CA 90250-4482
Heecheol Kwon
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 349-2980
Akbar Farokhi, Public Works Director
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 349-2985
City of Inglewood
1 W. Manchester Blvd., 3
rd Floor
Inglewood, CA 90301-1750
Lauren Amimoto
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 412-5192
Thomas Lee
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 412-5333
City of Lawndale
Office of the City Manager
14717 Burin Avenue
Lawndale, CA 90260
Sean M. Moore
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 371-3202
Fax: (310) 371-8877
City of Lomita
24300 Narbonne Avenue
Lomita, CA 90717
Ryan Smoot, City Manager
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 325-7110 ext. 115
Fax: (310) 325-4024
South Bay Council of Governments
20285 S. Western Ave., #100
Torrance, CA 90501
Jacki Bacharach, Executive Director
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 293-2612
EXHIBIT D
Dominguez Channel Watershed Management Area Group
EXHIBIT E
Reconciliation Template
[the line items shown in this Exhibit are placeholders and are subject to change]
CIMP & WMP RECONCILIATION
MONITORING SERVICES FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 Total
Budget (MOA) $
Actual $
Balance $
WMP-RELATED TASKS Budget
(MOA)
Actual
(To Date) Balance
Semi-Annual Progress Report $
Annual Reporting Package $
WMP Revision/RAA/Adaptive Management $
Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD) $
Special Studies/Projects $
Total $
IIP CONTRACTS
NPDES Permittee Contract Amount Balance
$