The vast majority of those vacant lots are either too small to develop or have substantial barriers to development, such as expensive environmental remediation of former oil well sites. Therefore, in order to ensure sites selected for the site inventory do not have existing uses that are impediments to housing development, staff conducted extensive analysis to only select sites that are most likely to develop during the planning period, employing a front-end method of filtering out parcels. Development likelihood and feasibility was determined by a number of different variables, including improvement-to-land value ratio, existing lot coverage, lot size, future development potential, and existing use and unit count where applicable. The City analyzed the most current parcel-level data across such variables to determine which sites were most appropriate for inclusion into the site inventory and to estimate the number of additional units that are likely to be developed.nAdditionally, staff conducted visual screenings of sites using google earth and removed any site that appeared unlikely to develop for any reason based on an aerial photography analysis.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-58
Appendix
C
For larger sites of more than 2 acres, staff did extensive research on the site, reviewing existing uses, leases,
and other factors and removed any identified sites with demonstrated impediments. Finally, staff also conducted additional market research to support assumptions
around parcel turnover at commercial sites. Many of
the non-vacant sites in the inventory have an existing
commercial use or are in a zone that is currently zoned commercial only but will soon allow residential uses once the zoning district is updated to align with the new Land Use Element designation. Staff found that outside of the Downtown area, commercial and office vacancy rates
in Long Beach are higher than in the Los Angeles region and have only increased since the start of the pandemic.
The current suburban mall vacancy rate in Long Beach is more than 50 percent for example, compared to 8 percent in Los Angeles. Many of the aforementioned larger sites are currently developed as half-empty malls or strip malls that will soon be zoned to allow for by-right multifamily residential development. See Appendix C-3 (Appendix to this Appendix) for reports detailing these trends. Given these high commercial vacancy rates even compared to
the region, as well as the new allowance for multi-family residential development under the rezoning program, it
is likely that such sites will turnover during the planning period.
In sum, the City took a conservative approach using a
front-end method of filtering out in order to include only sites that are the most likely to develop. Therefore, based on this evidence, the City of Long Beach has determined that the sites on the Site Inventory are feasible for
residential development, do not have impediments due to existing uses, and are the sites in the City most likely to be developed with housing during the planning period.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-1
DAppendix
November 2021
Appendix D: Housing
Constraints
The provision of decent, safe, and affordable housing is an important goal of the City of Long Beach. However,
there are a variety of factors that facilitate or constrain the development, maintenance, and improvement of
the housing stock in the City. These include government codes and regulations, market mechanisms (such as
real estate trends and construction costs), and physical and environmental constraints. This section reviews
and analyzes these potential constraints, in terms of
a) governmental constraints, b) non-governmental
including market constraints, and c) environmental and
infrastructural constraints
Section D.1 Go vernmental Constraints
Local policies and regulations can impact the availability of housing and, in particular, the provision of affordable housing. Land use controls, residential development
standards, fees and exactions, and permit processing
procedures among others may increase the cost of housing maintenance, development, and improvement. This
section discusses these potential constraints and actions taken to mitigate them.
D.1.1 Transparency in Development
Regulations
The City’s website provides a variety of information
and resources to help property owners and developers
navigate through the development process. The majority of the information is located under the Development
Services Department webpages (https://www.longbeach.
gov/lbds/), which include the following:
» Application and forms for Building and Planning permits, Code Enforcement, Historic Preservation, and Housing &
Neighborhood Services
» Documents such as Building Standard Code and
Permitting Guidelines
» Planning documents such as General Plan, Specific
Plans, and Zoning Code
» Fee schedule
The City also offers electronic plan check and online
permits.
D.1.2 Land Use Controls
A. General Plan PlaceType Designations
Adopted in 2019, the Land Use Element (LUE) of the
Long Beach General Plan sets forth the City’s policies for guiding local development. It establishes the distribution and intensity of land that is allocated for different uses.
The General Plan LUE uses an innovative approach called “PlaceTypes, ” which emphasizes flexibility and allows for a mix of compatible uses. This approach provides regulating guidance on land use, form, and character-defining
features. Though many of the PlaceTypes allow for greater density and mix of uses, particularly near transit stations and along transit and commercial corridors, nearly half (47.3%) of the City’s land area comprises non-residential PlaceTypes such as Industrial, Commercial, and Regional Serving Facility which cover the Port of Long Beach, the airport, and institutional uses. Another 40.9% of the City’s land area is comprised of the Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood (FCN) PlaceType, which is a low-density
residential PlaceType reflective of much of the existing single-family areas in Long Beach. The remaining 11.8%
of the City’s geography is designated with higher-density residential or mixed-use PlaceTypes that can accommodate densities, and more appropriate to accommodate housing.
These areas include the Neighborhood Serving, Multi-
Family, Downtown, Transit Oriented Development, and
Waterfront PlaceTypes.
The nine PlaceTypes in the LUE that allow residential uses are detailed in Table D-1. As shown on Figure D-1, these PlaceTypes are generally concentrated in areas closest to Metro A line stations and high-quality transit corridors in the southern part and western half of the City.
While the City’s LUE identifies a variety of PlaceTypes which allow a full range of residential development types (single- family, duplexes, apartments, etc.) at a variety of intensities as noted above, the PlaceTypes with the most development potential are applied in a limited extent. While the new LUE significantly expands the City’s capacity for new
housing development, there remain constraints in terms
of opportunities for new housing in some areas in the City due to a combination of PlaceType designation and height limits established in the LUE. These constraints stem in part from multigenerational land use patterns and planning
decisions that have limited new housing development in
highest opportunity areas. Over 40% of the City is reserved for low-density development with maximum two-stories
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-2
Appendix
D
November 2021
in the FCN PlaceType. This PlaceType covers a variety of contexts, typically areas currently developed as single- family or low-density residential, however the PlaceType is also applied in older central City neighborhoods which are developed with multi-family and currently non-conforming under existing R-1 and R-2 Zones (see below) due to
downzoning from multi-family to single-family in the
late 1980s. Since the FCN PlaceType does allow for other types of low-density housing at densities up to 18 units per acre, it will be important to keep this in mind as the City develops zoning regulations to implement the FCN
PlaceType, instead of maintaining existing regulations
which are more restrictive than what is already built in some areas. The City has already demonstrated how the LUE PlaceTypes are flexible and can be implemented through
more progressive zoning tools (see discussion of UPLAN, in the section below). Taking a flexible approach to FCN is particularly important given the City’s focus on equity and increasing community access to high quality schools, parks, and housing options. The LUE is adaptable enough Figure D-1 : General Plan Residential PlaceTypes
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-3
DAppendix
November 2021
to support the City’s goals of removing barriers to housing production to help combat the City’s well-documented
housing shortages and ensuring the availability and fair distribution of affordable housing throughout the City to reverse existing patterns of segregation and concentrated poverty. To help ensure the LUE PlaceTypes are not a barrier to residential development, the City has proposed Program
2.3: A Variety of Housing Types in Low Density Zones,
to update the Code to provide use and development
regulations that reflect the intent of the Founding and Contemporary Neighborhoods to accommodate a variety
of housing types.
In addition to controlling density and the type of uses, the LUE also establishes maximum heights Citywide. Each Table D-1: General Plan Residential PlaceTypes
PlaceType Density (max.) Height Primary Residential Uses Founding and
Contemporary
Neighborhood
7-18 du/ac 2 stories max;
varies by area Single-family and low-density housing
Multi-Family
Residential-Low
Up to 29 du/ac based on
lot size 4 stories max Duplex, triplex, and garden apartment housing Multi-Family
Residential-Moderate
Up to 62 du/ac based on
lot size 6 stories max Moderate-density apartment and condominium buildings on larger parcels of land
Neighborhood-
Serving Centers and
Corridors-Low
Up to 44 du/ac based on
lot size 4 stories max Low-density apartment and condominium buildings
Neighborhood-
Serving Centers and
Corridors-Moderate
Up to 54 du/ac based on
lot size 7 stories max Moderate-density apartment and condominium buildings on larger parcels of land
Transit-Oriented
Development-Low
No max. density; 5
stories max. 5 stories max. Low urban density apartment and condominium buildings
Transit-Oriented
Development-
Moderate
No max. density; 10
stories max. 10 stories max. Moderate urban density apartment and condominium buildings
Downtown 38-500 ft (with
incentives) max. height
38-500 ft (with
incentives) max.
height
Ranges from smaller-scale residential units to
medium-scale and high-rise residential towers
Waterfront 35-600 ft max. height 35-600 ft max.
height
Ranges from low-rise multi-family residential
buildings to mid-rise and high-rise housing
developments
PlaceType has a maximum height limit (See Table D-1)
which is superseded by the LUE PlaceType Height Limits
Map (see Figure D-2) which may provide more restrictive height limits depending on geography. The added layer
of restriction further limits the development potential afforded under the PlaceTypes, in some cases reducing
multi-family or mixed-use area height limits by one
or two stories. Height is commonly a limiting factor in development feasibility, especially when combined with
other zoning regulations such as setbacks and parking. For further discussion of height, see Section C.2, below. The City will need to ensure LUE height limits do not constraint development potential by augmenting other development
regulations to help ensure maximum densities are
achievable.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-4
Appendix
D
November 2021 Land Use Element | City of Long Beach68 Land Use Plan
4 Map LU-8
PLACETYPE HEIGHT LIMITS
Map LU-8
HEIGHTS
December 2019
Figure D-2 : PlaceType Height Limits Map
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-5
DAppendix
November 2021Land Use Plan | Creating Vibrant and Exciting Places 69 Land Use Plan
4 ARTESIA FWY
ARTESIA
CHERRY
SOUTH
LONG B
EACH
DEL AMO BLVD
DIEGO
SPRING
WILLOW
PACIFIC COAST
CHERRY
SANTA FE
ANAHEIM
7TH 7TH
LONG BEACH
PACIFIC COAST
SPRING
2ND
L.A.
County
PARAMOUNT
DOWNEY
ATLANTIC
ORANGE
MARKET
DEL AMO
CARSON
ORANGE
CONANT
SAN
ANTON
IO
SAN
FWY
BROADWAY
OCEAN
CHERRY
ORANGE
OCEAN
HARBOR SCENIC
OCEAN
2ND
LOYNESELIOT
XIMENO
ATHERTON
PARK
APPIAN
WILLOW
WARDLOWWARDLOW
STEARNS
CLARK CLARK
SAN DIEGO FWY
70TH
4 TH
LOS ANGELES RIVER
PACIFIC
BROADWAY
SAN GAB
RIEL RIV
ER
ALAMITOS
4TH
HARDING
7TH
10 TH10TH
ANAHEIM
City of
Carson
City of
Seal Beach
City of
Compton
City of
Paramount
City of
Bellflower
City of
Hawa
Gardens
iian
City of
Los Angeles
City of
Lakewood
405 605
710 605
405
405
405
710
710
91 22
47 103
91 BIXBY
PACIFIC
TEMPLE
City of
Los Alamitos
405
LOS COYOTES DIAGONAL
CARSON
3RD
STUDEBAKER
STUDEBAKER
BELLFLOWER
LAKEWOOD
LAKEWOOD
PALO VERDE
REDONDO
TERMINO
JUNIPERO
SAN GABRIEL RIVER
City of
Signal Hill
2 ST2 ST
2 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
5 ST
Refer to the Port Master Plan
for Height Limit
2 ST
2 ST
150 ft
65 ft
65 ft
2 ST
2 ST
4 ST
4 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
3 ST
40 ft
65 ft
2 ST
2 ST
2 ST
65 ft
3 ST
2 ST
2 ST 2 ST
3 ST
4 ST
2 ST
60 ft
3 ST
4 ST
2 ST
2 ST
40 ft
40 ft
40 ft
4 ST
45 ft
45 ft
3 ST
3 ST
FAA and Zoning Code
Regulates Height
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
2 ST
2 ST
4 ST
3 ST
Refer to the
Zoning Code
for Height Limit
4 ST
60 ft, 4 ST
40 ft
2 ST
2 ST
5 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
35 ft
45 ft
4 ST
3 ST
10 ST
45 ft
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
5 ST
3 ST
60 ft
65 ft
40 ft
5 ST
45 ft
3 ST
3 ST
100 ft
4 ST
2 ST
3 ST
6 ST
55-265 ft
3 ST
10 ST
10 ST
FAA and
Zoning
Code
Regulates
Height
100 ft
5 ST
16 ST
3 ST
4 ST
4 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
40 ft
Unlimited
Height
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
40 ft
45 ft
3 ST
12 ST
3 ST
3 ST
4 ST
7 ST
5 ST
3 ST
45 ft
Refer to SP-2 (SEASP) for Height Limit
Rancho
Estates
(PD-11)
1 ST Height
Limit
4 ST
4 ST
4 ST
3 ST
3 ST 6 ST
4 ST
4 ST
3 ST
5 ST
4 ST
45 ft
60 ft
3 ST
60 ft
4 ST
300 ft 420 ft
5 ST
45 ft
3 ST
3 ST
4 ST
3 ST
4 ST
3 ST
600 ft
5 ST
3 ST
3 ST
240 ft
40 ft
10 ST
40 ft
35 ft
3 ST
100 ft
4 ST
3 ST
3 ST
7 ST
4 ST
7 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
3 ST
Legend
0 0.5 10.25
Mile
2 Stories
3 Stories
4 Stories
5 Stories
6 Stories
7 Stories
10-16 Stories
80 - 100 Feet
35 - 75 Feet
135 - 150 Feet
240 Feet and Over
Please refer to height number for maximum building height Maximum Building Heights Building Height Boundary
Building Height (Feet and/or Stories)40 FT
4 ST
December 2019
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-6
Appendix
D
November 2021
B. Zoning Districts
The Zoning Code implements LUE policies by specifying
detailed development regulations that accomplish the
General Plan’s goals. These include specific use types (such as residential, retail, office, and industrial) that are allowed and not allowed by the corresponding zoning district
and building development standards (such as height and
placement on a site). State law requires that zoning be consistent with maps and policies in the General Plan, so when the LUE establishes maximum densities and height
limits, the zoning code can only allow development
underneath this cap. Since uses and densities/intensities may only be permitted if they are consistent with both the General Plan land use designation and the zoning of the property, limitations of the General Plan (as noted above) translate to limitations of the Zoning Code. The Long Beach Zoning Code is contained within the City’s Municipal Code and implements the general policies contained in the
General Plan.
While it has been amended numerous times, including
significant revisions in 1997 and a number of recent
and ongoing amendments in an effort to make minor
improvements pending more significant updates, the
existing Zoning Code hasn’t been comprehensively
updated in more than 30 years. The Zoning Code should
ideally be updated periodically to respond to new land
use trends, economic and environmental conditions,
and evolving community needs and priorities while also
becoming more accessible and easier to understand for
the general public. As a result, the Code, as it is currently written, no longer aligns with current goals, new City
priorities, or today’s realities and it is not consistent with the new LUE. This incongruency is a major impediment to the development of new housing in most of the City, especially outside of the areas that have had recent code updates, or are regulated by Specific Plans or Planned Districts, such as the Downtown and Midtown areas, as well as the newly adopted UPLAN and Code.
In 2019, the City performed an audit of the Zoning Code (Code Audit) to identify inconsistencies between the
existing Code and the newly adopted LUE. Findings from
the Code Audit that are relevant to this discussion on
housing constraints are incorporated into this analysis, as appropriate. In a future phase, the City is expected to amend the Code to address constraints identified in the Code Audit and fully implement the policies of the LUE.
The Zoning Code delineates the following six basic
residential zones, with 20 subcategories:
R-1: Single Family (plus suffix S, M, N, L, or T)
R-2: Two Family (plus suffix S, I, N, A, or L)
R-3: Low Density Multi-Family (plus suffix S, 4, or T)
R-4: High Density Multi-Family (plus suffix R, N, H, U, or M) RM: Mobile Home (no suffix attached)
RP: Residential Planned Unit Development (no suffix
attached)
In addition, the following commercial zones also allow
residential uses:
CNR: Neighborhood Commercial and Residential
CCR: Community R-4-R
CNN:Community R-4-N
CHW: Regional Highway District
Residential zoning districts are defined in the Code as follows:
R-1-S: The R-1-S District is a single-family residential district with small lots. The District recognizes the existing subdivision pattern and is established to accommodate the requirements of a modern home on existing small lots. This Zone is only appropriate in high open space amenity areas such as the Coastal Zone.
R-1-M: The R-1-M District is a single-family residential district with moderate sized lots. This District recognizes the difficulty of developing odd sized and shaped parcels with normal sized lots. It also recognizes the City’s objective of providing more affordable ownership housing and the
effect of lot size on housing costs.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-7
DAppendix
November 2021
R-1-N: The R-1-N District is a single-family residential district with standard lots. This District recognizes the outdoor lifestyle characteristic of Southern California and is established to protect such areas from overcrowding and conversion to higher densities.
R-1-L: The R-1-L District is a single-family residential district with large lots. This District recognizes the need for an open, uncrowded living environment within metropolitan
centers.
R-1-T: The R-1-T District is a single-family district of townhouses.
R-2-S: The R-2-S District is a two-family residential district with small lots. This District recognizes existing subdivision and use patterns in distinct portions of the City and is established to accommodate such patterns without
crowding and congestion. This Zone is generally not
suitable outside of the Coastal Zone.
R-2-I: The R-2-I District is a two-family residential district with intensified development on the lots. This District recognizes existing subdivision and use patterns in distinct portions of the City and allows an intensity of development appropriate only in areas within immediate proximity to public open space.
R-2-N: The R-2-N District is a two-family residential district with standard lots. This District recognizes the need for two-family, moderate density housing with outdoor living space.
R-2-A: The R-2-A District is a two-family residential district with standard lots. This District restricts one (1) unit to a small accessory unit. This District recognizes the desire to maintain the existing character of a community by
retaining single-family dwellings while adding a second unit to the rear.
R-2-L: The R-2-L District is a two-family residential district with large lots. It recognizes the use pattern of two-family dwellings in older, large lot subdivisions. It also encourages the preservation of these neighborhoods and also provides opportunity for spacious, well-designed, two-family
developments.
R-3-S: The R-3-S District is a three-family residential district.
This District recognizes the constraints small lots place on multifamily developments and the adverse consequences
related to large scale multifamily development in existing neighborhoods of single-family use.
R-3-4: The R-3-4 district is a four-family residential district.
The district recognizes the constraints lot size places on multifamily development and the adverse consequences
related to large scale multifamily uses development in
single-family neighborhoods.
R-3-T: The R-3-T district is a townhouse or row house
residential district on small (especially shallow) lots. It is intended for residential lots located along significant traffic arteries where a lot line to lot line, high lot coverage, inward-oriented dwelling is appropriate. This district is typically appropriate in areas in transition from commercial to residential use.
R-4-R: The R-4-R district is a moderate density, multifamily residential district with restrictions on building height. It is intended to provide a moderate density use consistent in scale with existing older and lower density developments.
The district is designed to encourage full development in established moderate density neighborhoods.
R-4-N: The R-4-N district is a high density, multifamily residential district. It is intended to meet the demand of a broad segment of the population which provides a
diversity of housing choices.
R-4-H: The R-4-H district is a high-rise, high density, multifamily residential district. The district is intended to encourage residential development with a distinctive urban living environment.
R-4-U: The R-4-U district is a high-density, multifamily residential district. It is intended to provide housing opportunities in an urban context and design style to
support downtown activity center employment with
adjoining housing.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-8
Appendix
D
November 2021
RM: The RM district is a single-family residential district for mobile homes and manufactured housing. This district recognizes the significant contribution that mobile home housing developments can make toward providing a
diversity of housing choices. This district is established to encourage such development on large sites.
R-4-M: The R-4-M district is a moderate density subdivided mobile home park development district. The district
recognizes the wishes of mobile home owners in rental
mobile home parks to be given the opportunity to own
the space on which their mobile home is located. Such
subdivisions of mobile home parks to resident ownership is encouraged by the State of California as an appropriate method of preserving low-income housing stock.
RP: The RP district is a residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) district. It is intended to encourage innovative, creative developments according to good urban planning
principles, across a range of potential densities providing new and diverse housing opportunities, with integrated
community facilities and benefits. The district is designed to reduce or eliminate rigidity that otherwise may result from the application of traditional development standards, and to encourage the development or recycling of larger parcels of land as coherent, integrated projects. The zoning symbol “RP” must be followed by a number indicating the approved density in DU/ac, such as “RP-12” or “RP-18. ” Despite the variety of zones that allow multi-family the actual area of land covered by these zones is a small
portion of the City. Therefore, the potential for Long Beach to develop multi-family at the appropriate intensities to meet desired housing goals is limited to the minimal areas of City land located along some major corridors. Also, these multi-family areas have their own constraints, because of the required consistency with density and height limits of the LUE.
Commercial zoning districts that allow residential uses are established as follows:
CNR: The Neighborhood Commercial and Residential
(CNR) District is a mixed-use district permitting small scale commercial uses and/or moderate density residential
development at R-3-T densities.
CCR: The Community R-4-R (CCR) District is similar to
the Community Auto-Oriented District, but also permits
moderate density residential development at R-4-R
densities.
CNN: The Community R-4-N (CCN) District is similar to
the Community Auto-Oriented District, but also permits
medium density residential development at R-4-N
densities.
CHW: The Regional Highway District (CHW) is a commercial use district for mixed scale commercial uses located along major arterial streets and regional traffic corridors.
Planned Development Districts (PDs)
The Planned Development (PD) district allows flexible
development standards for areas with unique land uses
that would benefit from special design policies and
standards not otherwise possible under conventional
zoning district regulations. The PD district is designed to promote a compatible mix of land uses, allow for planned commercial/business parks, and encourage a variety of
housing styles and densities. Many of the PD districts have provided the primary opportunities for infill development during the past decade, specifically in PDs 5, 6, 25, and 30.
The City has several PD districts that have not been updated and do not have improved standards to facilitate housing production, such as higher allowable density, which has limited new development in these older districts, compared to the more recent PD30 and SP1, which incorporate more flexible standards to promote residential development.
The new LUE identifies opportunities to update existing PDs to better implement the PlaceTypes, such updating
PD-2 to better align with the intent of the Waterfront and Regional-Serving Facility PlaceTypes.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-9
DAppendix
November 2021
The PD districts with significant potential for residential development are noted below, as defined in the Code:
PD-1 Southeast Area Development and Improvement
Plan: Established residential neighborhoods continue to anchor the area and are complemented by businesses,
restaurants, hospitality uses, and recreational amenities.
The proposed land use plan for the area accommodates a
mix of single-family residential, mobile homes, and multi- family residential uses.
PD-25 Atlantic Avenue: The Atlantic Avenue PD-25
area is transitioning from conditions such as vacant,
underutilized, and deteriorated commercial and residential structures and incompatible land uses, to include new
schools, banks, residences, and shopping opportunities.
PD-25 aims to ensure that recycling and reinvestment
results in high-quality development and compatible uses that complement and serve the adjoining residential
neighborhoods. New workforce, senior, and family housing developments are developing in this corridor.
PD-30 Downtown: PD-30 is designed to develop the
downtown into a multi-purpose activity center of regional significance and to connect the various districts of
downtown into a cohesive and functional whole. PD-30
residential districts include the: Mixed Use District, East Village Mixed Use District, West End Residential District, and East Village Residential District. Typical densities range from 31 to 54 units per acre, with unlimited higher densities available to high-rise buildings in the Downtown Core.
Uptown Long Beach- UPLAN
As part of the earliest Land Use Element implementation efforts, the City of Long Beach in collaboration with the North Long Beach community, developed and completed
Phase 1 of the Planning Land Use & Neighborhood Strategy in Uptown (UPLAN) in 2019. The rezoning to implement the land use vision was adopted in December 2020. The zoning included the following zones:
RMU3 and RMU3 A-Series Residential Mixed-Use 3 zones
are residentially focused and permit a range of residential configurations with limited neighborhood-serving
non-residential uses. Use may be configured in a horizontal or vertical mixed-use format.
RMU4 and RMU4 A-Series Residential Mixed-Use 4
zones are residentially focused and permit higher density residential uses in areas where multi-family housing is currently dominant use. These zones permit intensification of existing residential areas to increase housing
opportunities and introduce neighborhood-serving,
non-residential uses in proximity to residents.
MU-1 and MU-1 A-Series Mixed-Use 1 zones provide for
medium-scale, mixed-use development as a transition
between residential and mixed-use nodes. These zones
permit mixed residential and non-residential uses in a wide variety of configurations.
MU-2 and MU-2 A-Series Mixed-Use 2 zones provide for
neighborhood activity centers in proximity to bus routes and multi-modal corridors. These zones permit horizontal and vertical mixed-use appropriately scaled for adjacent neighborhoods.
MU-3 and MU-3 A-Series Mixed-Use 3 zones provide for
the highest intensity neighborhood activity centers in
proximity to bus routes and multi-modal corridors. These zones permit horizontal and vertical mixed-use scaled
for the highest intensity uses that benefit from transit proximity and pedestrian activity.
While UPLAN is an example of the implementation
opportunities available under the new LUE, as noted above, consistency requirements between the zoning code and
the LUE may impact development feasibility if density and height limits in the LUE are overly restrictive.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-10
Appendix
D
November 2021
C. Development Standards
These zoning districts and associated development
standards provide for the development of a variety of
housing types in the City. Tables D-2 and D-3 summarize the development standards for each zone, including
the UPLAN zones. Table D-4 summarizes the residential
densities allowed for multi-family districts. These tables are followed by an analysis of constraints of major categories of standards, such as parking, lot requirements, and height.
Currently, a majority of higher density residential
development occurs in areas with Planned Development
(PD) zoning, due to the flexibility in development standards built into the PD regulations, as well as other market
related factors such as the desirability of residential in PD areas, such as Downtown. As demonstrated later in Section IV, Housing Resources, and Appendix C, most development anticipated in PD zones is intended as high-density multi- family and/or mixed-use developments, at densities 30
units per acre or higher. This assumes a rezoning program (Program 1.1) to align the zoning regulations with the new Land Use Element PlaceTypes, which allow higher densities in PD-1 and PD-25. For example, in PD-30 (Downtown Core), there are no limits to height or density. The requirement for parking is one space per unit, without distinction by the number of bedrooms, a significant reduction from the 1.5 to two spaces that are generally required for units of one or more bedrooms in the City. With the reduced requirement for parking and no limit to height or density, developments have exceeded 200 units per acre in this area.
As shown in Table D-3, the City is developing new zones to implement the LUE, specifically new context sensitive mixed-use zones which allow for a variety of uses, standards which promote more urban and walkable development
patterns, and reduced parking requirements (see Table
D-7).
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-11
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-2: Residential Development Standards
District
Max.
Units
Per
Lot
Density Min.
Lot
Area
(sq. ft.)
Max. Height
Max. Lot
Coverage
(% of Lot)
Min.
Usable
Open
Space
Floor
Area
Ratio
Min. Lot
Area Per
Unit (sq.
ft.)
Max.
Dwelling
Unit/
Acre
R-1-S 1 2,400 18 2,400 28 ft. N/A 6% 1.2
R-1-M 1 3,600 12 3,600 25 ft. N/A 6% 0.67
R-1-N 1 6,000 7 6,000 25 ft. 50% 16% 0.6
R-1-L 1 12,000 4 12,000 25 ft. 40% 23% 0.6
R-1-T 1 3,000 15 3,000 25 ft. N/A 6% 1.2
R-2-S 2 1,200 36 4,800 28 ft. N/A 2% 1.3
R-2-I 2 1,000 44 4,800 35 ft. N/A 2% N/A
R-2-N 2 3,000 15 6,000 25 ft. 60% 6% 0.6
R-2-A 2 3,000 15 6,000 25 ft. 60% 6% 0.6
R-2-L 2 4,000 11 8,000 35 ft. 40% 8% N/A
R-3-S 3 2,100 21 6,300 25 ft. N/A 250 sq.
ft./ unit N/A
R-3-4 4 1,700 26 4,500 25 ft. N/A 200 sq.
ft./ unit N/A
R-3-T N/A See Table D-4 3,000 28 ft. N/A 250 sq.
ft./ unit N/A
R-4-R N/A See Table D-4 18,000 28 ft. N/A 150 sq.
ft/ unit N/A
R-4-N N/A See Table D-4 18,000 38 ft.
(3 stories) N/A 150 sq.
ft./ unit N/A
R-4-H N/A See Table D-4 18,000 Varies (5-24 stories) 50% 150 sq. ft./ unit N/A
RM N/A 2,400 18 18,000 30 ft.
(2 stories) 65% 200 sq.
ft./ unit N/A
R-4-U N/A See Table D-4 22,500 65 ft.
(5 stories) N/A 150 sq.
ft./ unit 3.0
R-4-M 1 3,100 14 3,100 20 ft. 75% 10% N/A
RP - 1,200 36 2,400
25 ft: within 50 ft. of R-1, R-2, or
R-3 zoning district; 38 ft: other
area within PUD
N/A 6% 1.3
Suffix denotes: S = small lot; M = moderate lot; N = standard lot, L = large Lot; T = townhomes; I = intensified development; A = accessory unit; H= high rise; U = urban; RM = mobile homes
Source: Municipal Code, City of Long Beach
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-12
Appendix
D
November 2021
Table D-3: UPLAN Development Standards
Development Standard
Zones
RMU3/RMU3-A RMU4/RMU4-A MU-1-/MU-1-A MU-2-/MU-2-A MU-3-/MU-3-A Minimum Lot Size1 3,000 sq. ft.
Maximum Number of
Stories 3 4 3 3 4
Maximum Building Height 45 ft. 60 ft. 45 ft. 45 ft. 60 ft.
Building Placement and Activation
Primary Frontage (min. required public realm > building setback – measured from curb face to building face (ft.)2,3,⁴ Residential Stories 1-3 15 ft.⁵
Non-Residential Stories 1-3 10 ft.
Upper Stories 4th Story
and Above N/A
5 ft. greater
than the
average setback
of the lower
floors
N/A N/A
5 ft. greater
than the
average setback
of the lower
floors
Secondary/All Other Street
Frontages 10 ft. 8 ft. 8 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft.
Balconies 10 ft.
Interior Building Setbacks3
Alley 12 ft. from the centerline of the alley
Adjacent to existing single-family houses within R1 zones, where not separated by an alley Floor 1-2 15 ft.
Floor 1-2 20 ft.⁶
Upper Floors 0 ft.⁶
Active Ground Floor Condition, Min. Required Per Lot/Development Primary Frontage⁷ 25% 25% 25% 25% 50%
Secondary Frontage⁷ - - - 25% 50%
Notes:
1 Minimum only applies to new subdivisions of existing lots. 2 Due to the variable existing right-of-way dimension, setbacks from streets (primary, secondary, and other frontages) shall be measured from curb face to building face.
3 Projections are permitted in the required setbacks in accordance with Section 21.32.220(C). 4 When street dedications, street improvements and/or easements are required that would alter the location of the curb, setbacks shall determine to the satisfaction of the Director of Development Services or the Director of Public Works. Where not additional dedication is anticipated and narrow sidewalk conditions occur, the depth of the setback shall allow for an adequate minimum unobstructed path of travel and other pedestrian amenities, when combine with the public sidewalk, and balance the objective of maintaining the development feasibility of shallow lots. Alignment of front building facades should be also be maintained and should be within two feet of abutting properties. 5 A minimum depth of 5-feet of the setback area shall be hardscaped and/or landscaped. Stoops are required for residential units facing a street. 6 Measured parcel line to building face; adjacent to single-family houses within R1 zones. 7 See Map Atlas, and Section 8 for standards.
Source: City of Long Beach, Title 22 (Uplan Zoning Code)
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-13
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-4: Residential Densities for Multi-Family Districts District Site Area (sq. ft.) Site Width (ft.) Permitted Density by Site Area (sq. ft.) Per Unit
Density
Range (units
per acre)
R-3-T
0-3,200
3,201-15,000
15,001 or more
0-25
26-120
121 or more
1 unit per lot
1 unit per 3,000 sq. ft.
1 unit per 2,400 sq. ft.
13-18
R-4-R
0-3,200
3,201-15,000
15,001 or more
0-25
26-120
121 or more
1 unit per lot
1 unit per 1,500 sq. ft.
1 unit per 1,450 sq. ft.
13-30
R-4-N
0-3,200
3,201-15,000
15,001-22,500
22,501 or more
0-25
26-120
121-180
181 or more
1 unit per lot
1 unit per 1,500 sq. ft.
1 unit per 1,200 sq. ft.
1 unit per 975 sq. ft.
13-45
R-4-H
0-3,200
3,201-15,000
15,001-22,500
22,501 or more
0-25
26-120
121-180
181 or more
1 unit per lot
1 unit per 1,500 sq. ft.
1 unit per 1,200 sq. ft.
1 unit per 175-310 sq. ft.
13-249
R-4-U
0-3,200
3,201-15,000
15,001-22,500
22,501-30,000
30,001 or more
0-25
26-120
121-180
181-240
241 or more
1 unit per lot
1 unit per 1,500 sq. ft.
1 unit per 975 sq. ft.
1 unit per 500 sq. ft.
1 unit per 400 sq. ft.
14-109
Suffix denotes: N = standard lot, T = townhomes; H = high rise; U = urban Note:
The density allowed shall be that provided in the row corresponding to the site width and area. If the site width and area are in ranges located in different rows, then the higher of the two (2) densities is allowed.
Source: Municipal Code, City of Long Beach
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-14
Appendix
D
November 2021
C.1 Parking Requirements
Parking requirements for residential districts vary by the number of bedrooms in a housing unit, location of the
development, type of permitted use, and other criteria
associated with the demand for parking generated by
the particular development. Table D-5 details parking
requirements by residential type citywide and in Downtown Long Beach.
Except for Downtown, the UPLAN area, and the Coastal
Zone, the City’s parking regulations do not vary depending on context, which prevents the City from reducing required off-street parking in instances where appropriate based on anticipated demand. (In Los Angeles, for instance, the Cornfield Arroyo Specific Plan does not mandate parking minimums in the area covered by the specific plan, which is pedestrian-friendly and adjacent to public transit.) In addition, only garage parking is permitted to satisfy requirements for residential units. The existing parking regulations encourage and maintain an auto-centric
development pattern, requiring dedication of developable land to surface parking instead of other uses, such as
housing, or forcing construction of expensive structured parking to meet minimum requirements, a cost which is
typically passed on to the renter. Parking requirements have been a problem especially in applications for a change of use, as there is inadequate space in older developments to accommodate additional parking requirements. As
part of interviews conducted during the 2019 Code Audit commissioned by the City, stakeholders noted current
parking requirements, when coupled with other constraints such as height and density, can hinder new residential
development if parking area takes up a significant portion of developable land and reduces development capacity,
thus rendering projects financially infeasible. This is especially true for smaller lots and for projects targeting ‘missing middle’ product types or obtainably priced units.
The City does offer some incentives in an attempt
to prevent parking standards from constraining the
development of certain types of housing. For example, the Planning Commission may reduce parking requirements
to one space per three bedrooms for residential projects for lower income seniors and disabled residents in areas with available on-street parking or near transit. However, in several parts of the City on-street parking is limited in supply, making this finding difficult to achieve. Parking is also reduced for special group residences to one space per two beds. These parking incentives do not take
into consideration reduced parking demand for other
(non-senior) lower income households, or how the cost
of parking may impact the affordability of rental housing when the cost of onsite parking is coupled with the rental price of the unit.
In the coastal zone, the California Coastal Act encourages the City to preserve public coastal access. To ensure more on-street parking is maintained for public use, in areas already facing limited parking availability, the City requires an additional 0.5 spaces per one-bedroom unit and all
other unit sizes have the same parking requirements
as citywide (except in PD-30, where one space per unit
is required regardless of unit size). Given the desirable location, even small units (especially in the Belmont Shore area) are often occupied by households with two cars.
Specifically, the City conducted a parking study in Belmont Shore to identify appropriate parking standards for the area. To balance the need for parking for coastal access, business uses, and housing, the Zoning Code allows several incentives: tandem parking for low-income housing units when projects include 10% or more of the units on-site as low-income units and for projects of 20 units or more to satisfy the parking requirements for one-bedroom units in the PD-30 and the PD-5 districts. Moreover, PD districts also allow for shared use guest parking for mixed-use projects.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-15
DAppendix
November 2021
The UPLAN code adopted in December 2020 includes
context sensitive parking regulations (see Table D-7),
which result in a significant reduction in minimum parking required for residential units of all sizes as compared to citywide standards. In addition, parking may be
“unbundled” from the unit, parking is rounded down when performing calculations, there is no new parking required for a change of use of an existing structure, and parking are subject to future affordable housing incentives (in progress).
Table D-5: Parking Requirements
Use Required Number of Spaces
Residential Use Citywide Coastal Zone
0 bedroom (< 450 sq. ft.): 1.0 space/unit 1.0 space/unit 1 or more bedroom 1.5 spaces/unit 2.0 spaces/unit
2 bedrooms or more 2.0 spaces per unit 2.0 spaces per unit Guest parking 1.0 space/four units 1.0 space/four units Special Residential Uses Market Rate Unit Below Market Rent Handicapped1 1 space/1 bedroom 1 space/2 bedrooms
Senior Citizen1 1 space/1 bedroom 1 space/2 bedrooms
Congregate Care1 1 space/1 bedroom 1 space/2 bedrooms
Residential Care Facility 1 space/bed
Fraternity, Sorority,
Dormitory 1 space/bed
Other Special Group
Residences 1 space/2 beds
Downtown Plan
Dwelling Unit, Shopkeeper
Unit, or Live/Work Unit
1.0 space/unit
1.0 guest parking space/4 units (half of the guest
parking can be shared with commercial use)
Special Group Residence 1.0 space/3 bedrooms
Note:
1 The Planning Commission may further reduce the parking standards to 1 space per 3 bedrooms if it finds that the neighborhoods in which the facility is proposed has ample, readily available on-street parking or is well-served by public transportation and a concentration of senior services.
Source: Municipal Code, City of Long Beach
To address parking constraints citywide, the City proposes Program 2.3, to adjust development regulations to facilitate a variety of housing types consistent with the LUE.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-16
Appendix
D
November 2021
Table D-6: Required Parking for Limited and Conforming Accessory Dwelling Units and Primary Dwellings Use Required Number of Spaces
Coastal Zone and/or Parking Impacted Area
ADU 1 spot in addition to the required parking for the primary dwelling Primary Dwelling Same as existing number of spaces
Other Permitted Area
ADU 0 1.0 space/four units
Primary Dwelling Same as existing number of spaces Below Market Rent Source: Municipal Code, City of Long Beach,
Table D-7: UPLAN Vehicular Parking Requirements
Use Minimum Zone Requirement
RMU3/RMU3-A; RMU4/RMU4-A MU-1-/MU-1-A; MU-2-/MU-2-A; MU-3-/ MU-3-A
Residential
0 – 1 Bedroom 0.751 0.51
2 Bedrooms 1.251 11
3 or more bedrooms 1.51 1.251
Special group residence,
assisted living, congregate
care
0.332 0.252
Senior Housing 0.53 0.333
Live-work Units 1.5⁴ 1⁴
Guest Parking 1.5⁵ 1⁵
Notes:
1 Per unit; See parking incentives for inclusion of affordable housing incentives for inclusion of affordable housing 2 Per bed
3 Per bed; See parking incentives for inclusion of affordable housing 4 Per unit; See parking incentives for inclusion of affordable housing 5 See parking incentives for inclusion of affordable housing Source: City of Long Beach, Title 22 (Uplan Zoning Code) Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-17
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-8: UPLAN Parking Setback Standards
Zones
RMU3/RMU3-A RMU4/RMU4-A MU-1-/MU-1-A MU-2-/MU-2-A MU-3-/MU-3-A Required Minimum Parking Setback (Measured Parcel Line to Parking (Feet), applicable to surface or structured parking) Primary Frontage, Surface
Parking 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft.
Primary Frontage, Parking
Structure 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 15 ft.
Secondary Frontage 6 ft. landscape setback required between sidewalk and parking and shall be landscaped or decoratively hardscaped (not asphalt)
Alley 0 ft.
Adjacent to:
Residential District 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.
Non-residential or
Mixed-Use District 0 ft. 0 ft. 0 ft. 0 ft.
Source: City of Long Beach, Title 22 (Uplan Zoning Code) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-18
Appendix
D
November 2021
C.2 Site Requirements
In general, density, maximum height, and lot coverage
standards determine the number of units that can be
constructed on a given lot.
Density
Density regulations establish the allowed level of intensity in certain areas of the city. The existing Code establishes a variety of density requirements for high density multi- family residential zoning districts (See Table D-4) The density requirements have variable thresholds that change depending on the size of a lot, so as the lot size increases, more units are allowed onsite. While unit size impacts
the overall density of a project, the general emphasis on large development on large lots does significantly and
unnecessarily restricts appropriately scaled multi-family infill on small or medium size lots in the same context, which also significantly impacts affordability. The net result is to disincentivize the production of smaller, and potentially lower cost, units.
Additionally, the density regulations do not effectively implement the City’s Land Use Element, which allows for and accommodates a variety of uses and densities in the Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood PlaceType.
The majority of the City’s older, central neighborhoods are zoned R-1 (single-family) or R-2 (two-family). These neighborhoods are built at a higher density than is
allowed by the zone itself, resulting in large amounts of non-conformities in existing residential neighborhoods. As of 2019, the City estimates there are over 4,200 parcels and over 24,000 units that are non-conforming, which limits the ability of property owners to make improvements,
potentially impacting the quality of housing for existing tenants.
There is no residential density limit in the UPLAN mixed-use zones, and mixed-use projects with residential are not
subject to the minimum FAR requirements of the zone.
Areas of the City with residential PlaceType designations (such as Multi-Family Residential-Low) are limited to the allowed density of the PlaceType. The MFR-L PlaceType,
for example, has a maximum density of 29 units per acre.
While affordable housing projects may be feasible at these densities, HCD typically assumes a minimum density of 30 units per acre is needed to facilitate affordable housing.
As mentioned in Section D.1.1., the existing zones under the FCN PlaceType continues to perpetuate development
limitations across a wide area of the city. While these zones do fall under the umbrella density allowed in the FCN
PlaceType, appropriately implementing the full flexibility of the FCN PlaceType can alleviate some of the development constraints resulting from the existing restrictive density standards in R1 and R2 Zones.
While the Code establishes maximum density, projects
are not always able to develop under the maximum
allowed because of the combination of site development
requirements (such as lot size, height, and parking
requirements). A majority of development activity occurs in areas, such as Downtown, that are not subject to
density restrictions. To address the potential for projects outside of these areas this to develop under the maximum allowed density, the City proposes Program 2.3, to adjust development regulations to facilitate a variety of housing types consistent with the LUE.
Height
In Long Beach, the maximum building height ranges from
two stories in the low-density R-1 zone to five stories in the R-4-U zone. High rises are allowed in the core of Downtown PD-30 and along the Downtown Shoreline in PD-5 and
PD-6. The R-4-H zone offers a height incentive up to 24 additional stories if certain lot width and height standards are met.
Additionally, the existing zoning districts which allow mixed-use development (CNR, CCR and CCN) only allow a
maximum 44 units/acre and three stories in the densest of the three zoning districts, CCN.
While the regulations allow a variety of heights, much of the city is currently zoned for a 2-story height limit, which impacts developmental feasibility of medium and higher
density residential product types. Additionally, though the LUE provides more height flexibility by PlaceType, as noted above, the LUE imposes additional height limitations on much of the city despite higher maximum height
allowances outlined for each PlaceType. For example, the Neighborhood-Serving Center or Corridor – Moderate
(NSC-M) PlaceType allows for a maximum of 7 stories, but much of the area covered under this PlaceType is restricted to 3-4-5 stories per the LUE Height Limits map.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-19
DAppendix
November 2021
The new UPLAN mixed-use zones allow up to 4 stories, and 60 feet in the RMU4-A and MU3-A Zones. Combined with
reduced parking requirements, this additional height can help ensure development feasibility in the UPLAN area.
Lot Coverage
Maximum lot coverage standards vary from “none” in some residential zones, to 40% in the R-1-L and R-2-L zones, and no maximum in R-3 and R-4 zones.
When considered alone height and lot coverage standards don’t seem overly restrictive. However, when combined,
current standards substantially limit the achievement of maximum allowed height and density in the zone, and this impacts ability of the City to achieve housing development goals. The principal issue encountered when meeting all three of these standards is inefficient site utilization.
To address this, the City proposes Program 2.3, to adjust development regulations to facilitate a variety of housing types consistent with the LUE.
Table D-9: Housing Types by Residential Zone
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 RM CNR CCR CCN CHW
Single-Family Detached P P P1 P P P P P X
Single-Family Attached P2 P P P X P P P X
Duplex (2 units) P2 P P P X P P P X
Three-Family Dwelling X P3 P1 P X P P P X
Four-Family Dwelling X X P1 P X P P P X
Multi-Family (5 or more) X X X P X P P P X
Townhouse X P3 P P X P P P X
Manufactured Home P P⁴ X X P P P P X
Mobile Home Park C C C C C X X X X
Secondary Units A X X X X X X X X
Small Group Home P P P P P P P P X
Special Group Residence⁵ X X X C X X C C C
Transitional Housing P P P P P X X X X
Supportive Housing P P P P P X X X X
Shelters X X X X X X C C X
P = Permitted C = Conditionally Permitted A = Permitted Accessory Use (by right) X = Not Permitted Notes:
1 Except the R-3-T zone
2 Except the R-1-S, R-1-M, R-1-N, and R-1-L zones
3 Except the R-2-S, R-2-I, R-2-N, and R-2-L zones
4 Except the R-2-A zone
5 Special Group Residence includes residential care facilities, convalescent hospital, senior housing, housing for persons with disabilities, halfway housing, and communal housing.
Source: Municipal Code, City of Long Beach
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-20
Appendix
D
November 2021
Table D-10: UPLAN Residential Uses by Zone
Use
Residential
Mixed-Use
Zones
Residential
Mixed-Use Zones
(A Series)
Mixed-Use Zones Mixed-Use Zones (A Series)
RMU3 RMU4 RMU3-A RMU4-A MU-1 MU-2 MU-3 MU-1-A MU-2-A MU-3-A Single-Family Detached N N N N N N N N N N
Accessory Dwelling Unit Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Live/Work Units Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Multi-Family1 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Senior and/or
Handicapped Housing Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Group Home (1-6 Persons) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Special Group Residence N N N N C C C C C C
Emergency Shelter C C N C C C C C C C
Transitional Housing Y Y Y Y NL NL NL NL NL NL
Supporting Housing Y Y Y Y NL NL NL NL NL NL
Note:
1. Residential development shall be limited to attached configurations (rowhomes, townhomes) and detached courtyard-style multifamily development such as bungalows; single-family detached houses are prohibited.
Y – Yes, the use is permitted
N – No, the use is not permitted
C – Conditional use permit required
N/L – Is not listed in the use table for this zone; the Zoning Administrator has the authority to interpret the use as allowed given it is similar to the use listed for RMU zones, but this will be clarified in a future update through UPLAN Phase 2 zoning code updates (see Action 2.3.4) Source: City of Long Beach, Title 22 (Uplan Zoning Code) D. Provisions for a Variety of Housing
Housing Element law specifies that jurisdictions must
identify adequate sites to be made available through
appropriate zoning and development standards to
encourage the development of various types of housing
for all economic segments. This includes single and multi- family housing, factory-built housing, mobile homes,
emergency shelters, transitional housing, supportive
housing, and single-room occupancy (SRO) units, among
others. Table D-9 summarizes the housing types permitted within Long Beach’s primary residential zone districts.
Table D-10 lists the permit requirements for residential uses in the City’s UPLAN area. An analysis of these uses follows Table D-10.
In addition to single-family residential opportunities, the following housing types are available for all economic
segments of the community, including lower income
residents, seniors, students, homeless people, and other residents of the City.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-21
DAppendix
November 2021
D.1 Multi-Family
Multi-family housing comprises approximately half of the City’s housing stock. The City’s Zoning Code sub-categorizes multi-family housing units into duplexes, three-family
dwellings, four-family dwellings, and multi-family dwellings with five or more units. Duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and four-family dwellings are allowed in R-2, R-3, and R-4 zones. Multi-family dwellings with five or more units are permitted in the R-4 zones. Additionally, residential uses are allowed in the CNR, CCR, and CCN districts.
Outside of Downtown and the UPLAN area, additional
standards for multi-family residential uses are restrictive, limiting output of multi-family projects. For example, the Code requires 20-to-40-foot rear and side stepbacks on
the upper floors of buildings on lots in the highest density residential zoning district (R-4) if they abut any lower density zoning district. While this type of development standard can help with neighborhood compatibility
and break down the massing of structure, the 40-foot
requirement has the effect of reducing the overall
development potential on a site. This combined with
other use requirements such as the courtyard standard
requirements, can make higher density multi-family
developments difficult to design and potentially infeasible to build. These limitations are compounded by the other constraints imposed by development standards for each
zone, mentioned in Section C, such as height, density,
parking, and lot coverage.
D.2 Mixed-Use Development
Housing can be developed in mixed-use commercial
zones, provided it complies with the specified density
and development standards. Single-family detached,
single-family attached, duplexes, three-family dwellings, four-family dwellings, multi-family, townhouses,
manufactured homes, and small group homes are allowed
in CNR, CCR, and CCN zones. Special group residences are allowed by CUP in CCR, CCN, and CHW zones.
The current zoning regulations for multi-family (above) combined with the limited number of zones which allow
mixed-use, reduce the ability to build mixed-use projects; however, the new LUE opens up more of the City to
residential development by allowing residential uses in most of the PlaceType designations except those strictly reserved for commercial and industrial uses.
The recently adopted UPLAN code further promotes
mixed-use development consistent with the new LUE,
creating new Residential Mixed Use 3 (RMU3 and RMU3
A-series), Residential Mixed Use 4 (RMU4 and RMU4
A-series), Mixed Use 1 (MU1 and MU1 A-series), Mixed
Use 2 (MU2 and MU2 A-series), and Mixed Use 3 (MU3 and
MU3 A-series) zones. While these zones do require active ground floor uses, lobbies, common areas, and units with porches, patios, and stoops can satisfy this requirement.
Other ground floor design requirements, such as entrance and windows are not overly restrictive.
D.3 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)
ADUs are permitted in all zoning districts which allow
residential uses. ADUs are not allowed in zones that do not allow residential uses, even if a nonconforming residential use is present. The Zoning Code permits ADUs, provided
the following:
» The unit cannot exceed 50% of the primary dwelling’s
floor area or 800 square feet, whichever is more, up to a limit of 850 square feet for 0-1 bedroom, and 1,000
square feet for 2 or more bedrooms; and
» The unit is subject to minimum housing code compliance and the principal unit must be brought into compliance
before occupancy of the secondary unit is allowed.
The existing regulations for ADUs are not compliant with state law and will need to be updated. (see Program 1.7) D.4 Single-Room Occupancy
Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) units are one of the most
traditional forms of affordable private housing for lower income individuals, including seniors, and persons with disabilities. An SRO unit is usually small, between 80 and 250 square feet. These units provide a valuable source of affordable housing and can serve as an entry point into the housing market for formerly homeless people.
In 2015, the City adopted an ordinance to include SROs as a Special Group Residence. SROs are limited to occupancy by two persons per unit and shall have on-site management.
Conditions for approval are similar to those required for other special group residence uses in the same zone.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-22
Appendix
D
November 2021
D.5 Mobile/Manufactured
Mobile and manufactured homes make up an important
contribution to the housing stock, especially regarding housing choice and affordability, in the City of Long Beach.
According to the Department of Finance, the City had
2,346 mobile homes in 2019. The RM district allows for
mobile home parks. In addition, mobile home parks are
conditionally permitted in all residential zones provided that the specified requirements are met.
Manufactured or modular housing placed on a permanent
foundation is explicitly permitted in the R-1, R-2 (except R-2-A), and RM zones. Mobile/manufactured homes and
mobile parks have must also comply with supplemental
regulations related to density, parking, recreation areas, and setbacks.
D.6 Emergency Shelter/Low Barrier Navigation Centers
Senate Bill No. 2 (2007) amended Sections 65582, 65583, and 65589.5 of the Government Code relating to local planning.
This bill added emergency shelters to these provisions and required that the Housing Element identify zones in the City where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without a Conditional Use Permit. State law defines an emergency shelter as a means of housing with minimal
supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay.
In 2020, the City adopted several new regulations to create a new umbrella term, ‘Interim Housing, ’ that encompasses a range of temporary housing including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, transitional housing, bridge
housing, and supportive services such as safe parking
sites. These regulations allow for emergency shelters in more areas, including by-right in multiple industrial zones and a commercial zone, as well as with a CUP in other
commercial, residential, and institutional zones. As a result, emergency shelters are now allowed either by right or
with an entitlement in every council district in Long Beach across more than 2,500 acres, which is a large proportion of the City’s acreage. Though properties that make up the 2,500 acres vary greatly in size, they include many large sites, and as described in Appendix C, the City’s commercial vacancy rates for some sub-markets, such as suburban
market shopping malls, are as high as 50% compared
to just 9% in LA, representing significant opportunity
for redevelopment. These sites are generally well served by public transit, particularly those along commercial
corridors many of which are state -designated high quality transit corridors. Sites are spread throughout the city and the majority of Long Beach is designated by the state as within a high quality transit area. In addition to the City’s Multi-Service Center for the homeless in West Long Beach, the newly opened Atlantic Farms (2020) is a permanent
shelter available in addition the seasonal winter shelter.
The Continuum of Care Program, Program 4.1 in the
Housing Plan section of the Element discusses the services and facilities available at Century Villages at Cabrillo (CVC) and the City’s Health and Human Services Multi-Service
Center (MSC). CVC and the MSC are connected along
Santa Fe Avenue via a north/south bus connection. Bus
shelters and bus benches are found along Pacific Coast
Highway, Santa Fe Avenue, and Anaheim Street. According to the City’s Press Release # 100120, since 2015, the City of Long Beach has housed more than 5,000 individuals
experiencing homelessness, with an average of 1,000
individuals annually.
The CVC, located nearby in PD-31, is a collaborative
partnership of over a dozen agencies, providing housing and social services program for homeless people, children, and families. Built on a former naval housing site, new housing here ranges from emergency and transitional
shelters to permanent-affordable housing for singles,
families, Native Americans and veterans. Additionally,
support services include childcare, employment
counseling, mental health, and medical care. They also
have a program to help homeless children re-integrate
into the public school system in Long Beach. In 2019, the CVC served over 2,100 residents in a variety of emergency, transitional, and permanent housing settings, including over 500 children and over 1,000 veterans. Since 1997, the Multi-Service Center, a collaborative partnership between the City of Long Beach, the Port of Long Beach, and twelve public and private partner agencies has been located at 1301-1327 W. 12th Street. Services at the Center include:
showers, laundry, mail, medical clinic, employment
assistance, case management, and shelter and housing
placement assistance. The MSC serves almost 13,000 client visits every year.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-23
DAppendix
November 2021
In October 2020, the City opened the Atlantic Farms Bridge Housing Community (ABC) at 6841-6845 Atlantic Ave. in
North Long Beach- the first of a two-phase project that will include a state-of-the-art campus for housing, services, and a variety of supportive housing targeting individuals experiencing, or at risk of experiencing, homelessness.
According to the City’s press release, “the village-style development will help address a critical gap in the City’s Continuum of Care and offer a safe place and supportive resources for individuals experiencing homelessness. ” The
2.28-acre adult community contains dormitory style units with a total capacity of 125, with a temporary limit of 100 persons due to Covid-19. ABC is The site is operated by the non-profit organization, Volunteers of America, Los Angeles (VOALA). Access to the site will be provided through the Multi-Service Center (1301 W. 12th St.) or through outreach services.
The Atlantic Farms Bridge Housing Community is a
low-barrier facility designed to allow people access
whenever they are ready for support. The campus will
operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, year-round. It features:
» Intake, security and COVID-19 health screening space. » Spacious common areas, including:
– A kitchen
– A dining room
– A lounge
– Laundry facilities
» Gender-specific and gender-neutral restrooms and
showers.
» Case management/service connection offices.
» A family respite room (for emergency overnight use).
» Several outdoor amenities, including:
– A dining area
– A dog run and pet relief area
– Charging station
– Storage and parking
Additionally, throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the City has operated four temporary shelters offering a variety of necessities and services, including medical and mental health assessments and resources, and transportation for essential errands such as medical appointments, pharmacy and laundromats. There are nearly 250 guests currently
residing at the City’s shelters, which are providing a safe place for those most in need during this unprecedented
public health crisis. The City has also instituted a number of new measures to protect persons experiencing
homelessness from COVID-19, including installing soap
dispensers, handwashing stations or hand sanitizer stations at strategic locations throughout the city, distributing sanitation kits, and conducting outreach in the community.
D.7 Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing
In compliance with Chapter 633 of Statutes 2007 (SB 2), jurisdictions are required to consider and treat transitional and supportive housing as residential use subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 50675.2(h)
of Health and Safety Code defines transitional housing
as buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that call for
the termination of assistance and recirculation of the
assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. Section 50675.14(b) of Health and Safety Code defines supportive housing as housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 53260, and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community.
The City of Long Beach continues to support the conversion of surplus naval property to one of transitional housing facilities for homeless persons. The Century Villages at Cabrillo (CVC), as mentioned above, provides over 300 beds of transitional housing and services for men, women, and unaccompanied youth. The City of Long Beach regulates
transitional and supportive housing as a residential use in the same manner as similar uses in the same zone, as:
» Residential Care Facilities – if they meet the State
definition under the Lanterman Disability Services Act; » Dwelling Units – if they meet the California Building Code definition of a dwelling unit; or
» Special Group Residence – if they do not meet either of the above definitions.
In 2013, the City codified a Zoning Administrator
Interpretation to ensure that transitional and supportive housing is regulated as a residential use and subject to the same conditions for similar uses in the same zone.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-24
Appendix
D
November 2021
In 2020, the City adopted several new regulations to create a new umbrella term, ‘Interim Housing, ’ that encompasses a range of temporary housing including, but not limited to, emergency shelters, transitional and supportive housing.
The City also adopted 12 new Title 22 (UPLAN) zoning
districts in 2020 as the first new regulations to implement the 2019 Land Use Element update. These zones were
developed simultaneous to the the interim housing update, and although transitional and supportive housing is clearly allowed by-right in some of the UPLAN zoning districts, those uses are not listed in the use table for other UPLAN mixed-use districts. The intention was to allow these uses by-right in all districts. The UPLAN zoning districts will be expanded in 2022, and as outlined in Action 2.3.4, staff will analyze whether any amendments need to be made to
clarify that these uses are allowed in all mixed-use zones in order to ensure clarify and consistency as needed.
D.8 Farmworker/Workforce Housing
California Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5 and
17021.6 requires agricultural employee (farmworker)
housing for six or fewer persons to be permitted by-right in single-family zones and by right for 12 units or 36
beds in agricultural zones. Since the City does not have an agricultural zoning district, the City must only allow farmworker employee housing for six or fewer persons by right in single-family zones.
The City does not currently have specific zoning regulations for farmworker housing.
See program 2.5 regarding workforce housing.
D.9 Residential Care Facilities
The Long Beach Zoning Code defines residential care facility as “any family home, group care facility or similar facility as determined by the Director of the State Department
of Social Services. A residential care facility provides twenty-four (24) hour non-medical services, supervision or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. Residential care facility includes board and care facilities, halfway houses, housing for wards of the juvenile court and the like. ” Residential care facilities are included under special group residences and are allowed in R4, CCR, CCN, and CHW
districts with a Conditional Use Permit. Residential Care facilities for 7 or more persons is allowed with a Conditional Use Permit in the CCR and CCN Zones.
In Long Beach, a “Group home” means any residential
care facility for six (6) or fewer persons who are mentally disordered or otherwise handicapped or supervised. A
group home must be licensed by the State under the
provisions of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 1400)
of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code. Group home does not include any facility for wards of the juvenile court.
The definition of “Single-Family” includes group homes, and therefore residential care facilities for six or fewer persons are allowed in any location where single-family units are allowed, with the same development standards, permit requirements, and parking requirements Based
on an analysis of the use code and parking requirements for residential and congregate care facilities, the City has determined these regulations may pose constraints, and
has added Action 2.3.2 to evaluate these constraints and amend the code as necessary.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-25
DAppendix
November 2021
D.10 Housing for Persons with Disabilities
The City recognizes the need for housing for persons with disabilities (including developmental disabilities). The City facilitates the development of housing for persons with disabilities via provisions for special group residences and group homes, depending on the size.
» Small Group Care Facilities. Facilities serving six or fewer persons are regulated under a “group home” ,
as defined above. In compliance with the Lanterman
Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the City of
Long Beach permits the siting of State-licensed small
group homes serving six or fewer persons by right in all residential zones.
» Special Group Residences. The Zoning Code defines
special group residences to include (but not be limited to): residential care facilities, convalescent hospitals, senior citizen housing, housing for persons with
disabilities, halfway houses, and communal housing.
Special group residences are allowed in R4, CCR, CCN,
and CHW districts with a Conditional Use Permit.
Social services in support of housing for persons with
disabilities are classified in the Zoning Code as Institutional uses. Social services with food distribution are allowed with a Conditional Use Permit in the CNA, CHW, and CCN Zones.
Social services without food distribution are permitted in the CNP , CNA, CNR, CCA, CCP , and CCR zones with an Administrative Use Permit and the CCN and CHW zones by
right.
The City of Long Beach encourages the development of
special group residences as noted below:
» Special group residences are eligible for a density bonus incentive of up to 100% above the density allowed in
the underlying zone district. In a non-residential zone, density shall be limited to one unit per 200 square feet of lot area, which translates into a density of approximately 217 units per acre.
» Handicapped housing, senior housing, and congregate
care facilities that are low rent have a reduced parking requirement of only one parking space per two
bedrooms. Residential care facilities require only one
space per bedroom.
» Over concentration of uses is prevented by Code Section
21.52.271, requiring 1 ½ mile distance between special
group uses.
The City contains several housing and supportive uses,
including 14 privately owned housing complexes for
elderly or non-elderly persons with disabilities.
Definition of Family
In 2015, the City of Long Beach revised the definition of family to “two or more persons that occupy a dwelling
unit and live together as a single housekeeping unit.
A family has established ties and familiarity with each other; jointly uses common areas, interacts with each
other, shares meals, household activities and chores,
expenses and responsibilities. Membership in a
family is fairly stable as opposed to transient. Family members have some control over who becomes a
member of the family, and the residential activities
of the family are conducted on a non-profit basis.
Typically, each member of a family has access to all
parts of the dwelling unit and the members of the
family have close social, economic, and psychological
commitments to one another. ”
The definition of family does not present a constraint
to housing for persons with disabilities.
Building Code
The City adopted the 2019 California Building Code,
effective on January 1, 2020. No unique restrictions
are in place that would constrain the development
of housing for persons with disabilities. Compliance
with provisions of the Building Code is reviewed and
enforced by the Building Division of the Development
Services Department as a part of the building permit
submittal.
Planning/Processing Fees
Group homes are permitted by right and no permit
fees are required. Special group care facilities (for
more than six persons) require a CUP and a processing
fee. However, given the number of large residential
care facilities located in the City, the City’s processing fee is not seen as a constraint to the development of
housing for persons with disabilities.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-26
Appendix
D
November 2021
Reasonable Accommodation
It is the policy of the City, pursuant to the Federal
Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, to provide
people with disabilities reasonable accommodation
in rules, policies, practices, and procedures that may
be necessary to ensure equal access to housing. The
City has adopted specific procedures in the Zoning
Code (Chapter 21.25, Division XIII) for processing
reasonable accommodation requests.
In order to make specific housing available to persons
with disabilities, a disabled person or representative
may request reasonable accommodation relating to
the various land use, zoning, or building laws, rules,
policies, practices and/or procedures of the City. If
an individual needs assistance in making the request
for reasonable accommodation, or appealing a
determination regarding reasonable accommodation,
the Development Services Department will provide
the assistance necessary to ensure that the process
is accessible to the applicant or representative. The
applicant is entitled to be represented at all stages
of the proceeding by a person designated by the
applicant.
A request for reasonable accommodation in laws,
rules, policies, practices and/or procedures may
be filed on an application form provided by the
Development Services Department at any time that
the accommodation may be necessary to ensure
equal access to housing.
When a request for reasonable accommodation is
filed with the Development Services Department,
it will be referred to the Zoning Administrator or
Building Official for review and consideration. The
Zoning Administrator or Building Official will issue
a written determination within 30 days and may
(1) grant the accommodation request; (2) grant
the accommodation request subject to specified
nondiscriminatory conditions; or (3) deny the request.
All written determinations will give notice of the
right to appeal and the right to request reasonable
accommodation on the appeals process, if necessary.
The following findings must be analyzed, made, and
adopted before any action is taken to approve or
deny a request for reasonable accommodation:
◊ The housing will be used by an individual protected
under the Fair Housing Act.
◊ The request is necessary to make the housing
available to an individual protected under the Fair
Housing Act.
◊ The requested accommodation will not impose an
undue financial or administrative burden on the
City.
◊ The requested accommodation will not require a
fundamental alteration of the zoning or building
laws, policies and/or procedures of the City.
◊ For housing located in the coastal zone, a request
for reasonable accommodation will be approved
by the City if it is also consistent with the certified Local Coastal Program (LCP). Where a request is
not consistent with the LCP , the City may waive
compliance if the City finds:
• The requested accommodation is consistent, to
the maximum extent feasible, with the LCP; and,
• There are no feasible alternative means for
providing an accommodation at the property
that would provide greater consistency with the
L C P.
The City defines a group home as one for no more than
six persons. A request for reasonable accommodation
relating to increased occupancy of a group home can
be filed with the Zoning Administrator. A hearing with
the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission
is required to act on a request to increase the number
of occupants for a group home. A decision must be
made within 30 days by the Zoning Administrator or
within 60 days by the Planning Commission.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-27
DAppendix
November 2021
E. Incentives for Affordable Housing
To encourage the development and conservation of
affordable housing, the City has adopted an enhanced
density bonus ordinance that goes above and beyond
state law (while leaving the option for a developer to still take advantage of state density bonus law), streamlined processes and procedures for affordable housing
development, impact fee waivers including a new waiver
for moderate-income units, as well as various other
incentives. These ordinances encourage higher density
housing that is affordable to special needs populations and remove potential constraints to development, while
preserving affordable units in the coastal zone.
» Density Incentives – To ensure ongoing compliance
with State density bonus regulations, Long Beach has
adopted the State density law by cross-referencing
Government Code Section 65916 et seq. in Chapter
21.63 (Incentives for Affordable Housing). By doing so, it provides a density bonus of up to 50% to facilitate the development of lower income housing, moderate-
income condominiums, and housing for seniors. The
City also adopted an Enhanced Density Bonus program
in September 2021 that offers density increases,
incentives, and concessions beyond those provided by
State law. This Enhanced program offers up to 100%
bonuses for areas near high-quality transit in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing units and more
stringent no net loss provisions.
» Waiver of Fees – In addition to the density bonus, parks and recreation and transportation development fees are
waived for affordable housing if the criteria on length of affordability and income/affordability level are met.
» Relaxed Standards – In conjunction with the density
bonus ordinance, certain development standards may
be relaxed if increased density cannot be physically
accommodated on the site. This provision follows a
priority order specified in the Zoning Code and the
applicant must show that the density bonus cannot be
achieved with each sequential waiver before the next
waiver is allowed. The priority order is:
– Percentage of compact parking
– Tandem parking design limitations;
– Privacy standards;
– Private open space;
– Common open space;
– Height;
– Distance between buildings;
– Side yard setbacks;
– Rear yard setbacks;
– Number of parking spaces (but not less than one
space per unit); and
– Front setbacks.
If the developer believes that with the density bonus
and the additional incentives, the provision of lower
income housing, moderate income condominiums, or
senior citizen housing units is not financially feasible, then the developer may submit a project pro forma
demonstrating the deficiency.
» Long Beach Emergency Rental Assistance Program
(LB-ERAP) – In early 2021, the State legislature passed SB-91 to extend the COVID-19 Tenant Relief Act. In
addition to providing a five-month extension on the
State’s eviction moratorium, SB-91 also developed a
rental assistance program funded by Federal stimulus
funds. LB-ERAP implements tenant protection laws
enacted by SB-91. This program provides rental and
utility assistance to income-qualified tenants, for both past-due bills and future payments. The program
prioritizes lower-income tenants who have been
unemployed for 90 days or more and more likely to be
at risk of housing instability.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-28
Appendix
D
November 2021
» Inclusionary Housing – In January 2021, the City
adopted a new inclusionary housing policy, requiring
new residential projects with 9 or more units to set aside 10-11% of units for affordable housing (depending
on for sale or rental). The requirements apply in select portions of the City, such as Downtown and the Midtown
corridor, which follows the Long Beach Boulevard
corridor north to Wardlow Road, where the majority of
residential development is occurring. Developers have
the option to build on-site, within 2 miles of the site, or pay an in-lieu fee, contributing to a City affordable housing fund for new construction. The requirements
are only triggered in remaining portions of the City
when site plan review is required. Affordability would
be mandated for 55-years, consistent with affordability requirements for lower income units, such as units
receiving Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC).
The City approved a phased approach, with the most
stringent affordability requirements and in-lieu fees
beginning in 2023.
Although compliant with State Law, the City should
continue to monitor the incentives provided to maintain and ensure effectiveness, including the recently adopted ADU Amnesty Ordinance.
See Program 1.10: Unpermitted Dwelling Unit Amnesty
Program and Program 2.1 Development Incentives.
F. Replacement Policies
State Housing Element law requires a review of the City’s success in maintaining affordable units in the coastal zone.
Pursuant to Government Code (GC) Section 65590, “the
conversion or demolition of existing residential dwelling units occupied by persons and families of low or moderate income…shall not be authorized unless provision has been made for the replacement of those dwelling units with
units for persons and families of low or moderate income. ” However, the GC further stipulates several exemptions to the replacement requirement. Specifically, GC 65590(b)(3) provides the following exemption:
“The conversion or demolition of a residential structure located within the jurisdiction of a local government
which has within the area encompassing the coastal zone, and three miles inland therefrom, less than 50 acres, in aggregate, of land which is vacant, privately owned and available for residential use. ”
The City of Long Beach is primarily built out with limited vacant, privately owned, residential land in or within three miles of the Coastal Zone. The most significant opportunities for residential use within three miles of the Coastal Zone has been in the Downtown area, generally parking lots that were formerly owned by the City’s redevelopment agency.
Nevertheless, the City of Long Beach adopted its own
ordinance (LBMC 21.61 - Maintenance of Low Income
Housing in the Coastal Zone) in 1988, providing for
one-for-one replacement for very low, low and moderate
income housing units removed by new construction or
conversion to other non-residential uses. Affordable units may be replaced on site in a new housing development,
off site, or through the payment of in lieu fees. These fees range from $10,000 to $30,000 per displaced unit. In 2021 the City amended its Ordinance to update the in lieu fees to reflect current replacement costs as well as to eliminate exemptions to replacement requirements; fees now range
from $127,000 to $404,000.
In the City’s Coastal Zone, since 1980, approximately 446 new units have been built. Additionally, 375 affordable units have been demolished and 54 affordable units have been converted to market-rate condominiums for a total
of 429 units. Through its replacement policy the City has provided 778 affordable units within the Coastal Zone or 3 miles of its boundaries since 1980, nearly double the required replacement credits of 429 units.
G. Condominium Conversion
In Long Beach, conversion of low-income apartments to
condominiums is regulated by LBMC 21.60, which requires that low- or very low-income households that would be
displaced be given 18-months prior written notice of
the intended displacement. A developer can reduce the
noticing requirements to only 3 months’ notice if they
set aside at least 10% of the converted apartments to
be affordable to low-income households or at least 5%
affordable for very low-income households, for a period of 10 years. Additionally, existing residents are given an opportunity to purchase a converted unit, and lower-
income households may receive relocation assistance of
up to $8,441 for relocation costs.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-29
DAppendix
November 2021
D.1.3 Building C odes and Enforcement
Long Beach has adopted building and safety codes in order to preserve public health, safety, and welfare. To implement these codes, the City has various code enforcement
programs designed to address building and neighborhood
conditions. These building codes and their enforcement
have the potential to significantly increase the cost of development, maintenance, and improvement of housing.
» Building Codes - Long Beach has adopted and enforces
the California Building Code (CBC) that establishes
standards pertaining to the construction of housing and inspection at various stages of construction to ensure
code compliance.
» Accessibility Codes - The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1998 and the American Disabilities Act (ADA) are federal laws that are intended to assist in the provision of safe and accessible housing. These regulations were codified in Title 24, Part 2, known as the California Building
Code and apply to newly constructed multi-family
dwelling units in building with three or more units or in condominium projects with four or more units. The City
of Long Beach has adopted and enforces compliance
with these standards to comply with federal law.
» City Code Enforcement - The City’s Development
Services Department enforces State and local regulations governing the maintenance of residential buildings.
The Code Enforcement Division administers programs
to facilitate neighborhood upgrading, including
property maintenance, weed abatement, and other
citywide programs. In addition, the City implements a
Neighborhood Improvement Strategy (NIS). The NIS
program aims to improve the quality of life in specific CDBG-targeted areas through a partnership of City staff, other agencies and neighborhood residents.
» Community Code Enforcement - The Community
Code Enforcement program is designed to customize
actions to fit the needs of a specific neighborhood.
Target areas under the program are selected upon the
presence of established, active community groups, and
the need for code enforcement to assist in stabilizing
and improving the neighborhood. The City provides
the community with an individual point of contact and
City staff members who can coordinate with various
governmental agencies in addressing multi-faceted
problems.
Building codes and their enforcement increase the cost
of housing investment and can impact the viability of
rehabilitating older properties required to be upgraded to current code standards. To the extent this makes the cost of housing production or rehabilitation economically infeasible, it could serve as a constraint. However, these regulations are similar to other cities in the region, provide minimum standards for safe and accessible housing, and
thus are not considered to be an undue constraint upon
housing investment. Additionally, in early 2021, the City adopted an informal dwelling unit amnesty program to
allow unpermitted dwelling units to be legalized through a by-right process in which they only have to meet basic health and life safety standards, instead of being required to come into compliance with today’s codes (see Program
6.6).
Furthermore, the 2021 International Building Code (IBC) contains three new construction types that allow the use of mass timber and cross-laminated timber (a type of mass timber) for buildings of taller heights, more stories above grade, and greater allowable areas compared to existing provisions. This update will alleviate the financial burden of expensive construction materials for taller product types, as timber is more affordable than steel.
Some nearby communities are considering making
modifications to the building code and limiting the use of combustible materials contradicting the above allowance of wood for more products, especially in fire-prone areas.
These types of local motions supplement the state and
national building code, a trade-off which can further
constrain housing development.
The City has adopted local amendments that augment and
enacts the state’s building standards code, including, but not limited to, green building standards, that the City has deemed is reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. The City is:
» Traversed by the Newport-Inglewood Fault System, is
near the San Andreas Fault, and is surrounded by other
earthquake faults;
» Located in a region considered by experts to be one of the most active seismic regions in the world;
» Supported by a Fire Department whose resources could
be greatly delayed or overwhelmed in the event of a
seismic emergency;
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-30
Appendix
D
November 2021
» Within or near flood-prone areas that are capable of
maximizing public and private losses during times of
flooding in specified flood hazard areas;
» Impacted by an impermeable layer of clay that lies
between the City’s surface and the groundwater basin
underneath the City, preventing precipitation that falls locally from replenishing the basin; and
» Implementing initiatives, goals and actions to create a more sustainable Long Beach, and specifically calls out goals for green building and sustainable development,
urban nature, waste reduction, and water and energy
conservation.
The intent of the local amendments is to (1) minimize,
prevent and protect the community from natural hazards
such as earthquakes, floods, fires, etc., and (2) improve the health and welfare of the community through green
building and sustainable construction practices. Some of these amendments may increase building/development
costs. Though they could be seen as constraints in the short term, they have been deemed necessary to ensure
the long-term safety of the City and its residents and
are therefore not considered by the City to be undue
constraints.
Long Beach’s Code Enforcement bureau operates primarily on a complaint-based system. Code Enforcement also
has a Proactive Rental Housing Inspection Program
(PRHIP), under which staff conduct periodic inspections of residential rental properties to assure compliance with all applicable building, housing, and sanitation codes and ordinances. Code Enforcement estimates at a 120-day
turnaround period to resolve most violations, depending on available staff resources. Procedurally, complaints
received by Code Enforcement are assigned to the area
inspector and the complaint is inspected within 2 weeks. If a violation is observed, an Administrative Citation Warning notice is given to the owner along with resource information on how to resolve the violation. The owner is given 20 to 30 days to correct their violations, and a reminder notice is given half-way through their compliance date, 10 to 15 days.
If resolved by the compliance date, the case is closed. If significant progress is made, an extension is granted. If no progress has been made, an Administrative Citation is made, and the case continues. After another 20 to 30 days period, a re-inspection is done again and if no progress has been made, a 2nd citation is given, and the case is referred to the City Prosecutor.
Code Enforcement provides informational resources to
those they cite, including an application for the City’s Home Improvement Rebate Program that provides rebates
for improvements to the exterior façade of owners homes, as well as information on the City of Long Beach’s Language Access Program which provides service to those who speak Spanish, Khmer, and Tagalog, the four Long Beach city
languages.
To ease the burden of code compliance on lower-income
households, in July 2021 the City Council has temporarily established a prohibition on lease terminations and
evictions that were previously permitted when a property was undergoing a substantial remodel . An action within Program 5.2 (Tenant Protection) of the 6th Cycle HEU
also directs staff to explore the feasibility of establishing this as a permanent program. Similarly, Program 5.3
(Home Rehabilitation) continues the provision of housing rehabilitation assistance to lower-income households in the form of the Home Improvement Grant Program, Multi-
Family Rehabilitation Loan program, and Lead-Based Paint Hazard Abatement program.
Lastly, Program 5.4 (Comprehensive Code Enforcement)
outlines the City’s commitment to ensuring code
enforcement does not result in the citation of households without the resources to address violations. Under this program, code enforcement activities will be paired with connections to social service and economic support that anticipates cultural differences, language barriers, and financial constraints. This program is also complemented by Program 6.6 (Unpermitted Dwelling Unit Amnesty
Program), adopted in January 2021, which provides
a pathway for ministerial legalization of unpermitted
dwelling units to maintain existing housing stock and
prevent displacement.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-31
DAppendix
November 2021
D.1.4 P ermit, Processing, Procedures
A. Permits and Procedures
Communities can encourage needed reinvestment in
the housing stock by reducing the time and uncertainty
involved in obtaining development permits. Pursuant to
the State Permit Streamlining Act, governmental delays are recommended to be reduced by: (1) limiting processing
time in most cases to one year; and (2) by requiring
agencies to specify the information needed to complete an acceptable application. Table D-11 provides an overview of the permits, approvals, and review authority.
A.1 Site Plan Review
The requirements and process for Site Plan Review (SPR) are clearly specified in the City’s Zoning Code. SPR is required for all types of development, not only housing development. The interdepartmental committee that
conducts SPR includes planning, building, public works, fire, water, gas and police. The committee meets twice a month to provide feedback on and guide development
applications. Residential projects of less than five housing units typically do not require committee review. Projects with 5 to 49 units that comply with all standards and have no other zoning entitlements are only subject to Staff Site Plan Review. Planning Commission Site Plan Review
is required for developments with 50 or more units, and projects that require a Negative Declaration or Conditional Use Permit. The requirement for Planning Commission
review of projects with 50 or more units is waived for 100% affordable projects, thanks to a code amendment adopted in 2020.
A residential project of 50 or more units is also required to submit a conceptual site plan for review by staff prior to formal site plan review.
At the Site Plan Review, the review committee (either
staff or Planning Commission) can request reasonable
conditions for approval of the site plan, including:
» A revised site plan;
» Reduced building height, bulk or mass;
» Increased setbacks;
» Changes in building material;
» Changes in rooflines;
» Increased usable open space;
» Increased screening of garages, trash receptacles,
motors or mechanical equipment;
» Increased landscaping;
» Increased framing, molding or other detailing;
» Change in color; or
» Other changes or additions that are necessary to further the goals of the site plan review process.
Projects that undergo review by the SPR Committee must
meet the findings of LBMC 21.25.506, which requires there to be an essential nexus between the public improvement requirements and the likely impacts of the proposed
development.
According to the process flowchart provided by LBDS on
the Department website, projects which require Planning Commission approval take approximately 9.5 months
without continuances or appeals, and at least 14.5 months with continuances and appeals.
Most projects go through site plan review, and as reported in the Code Audit Report, there are concerns that the site plan review process, via the Site Plan Review Committee (SPRC), “is unnecessarily complicated, inconsistent,
requires too many potentially duplicative review meetings, and exercises too much discretion regarding architecture and design. ” One reason for these problems may be
because the threshold for site plan review is too low, which overburdens the SPRC caseload causing delays in review
and response to applicant questions. The conceptual site plan review process may not be working as intended, may be duplicative of the pre-application process, and should be evaluated for effectiveness and impact on project
approval. ”
To facilitate multi-family residential and mixed-use
developments, the City offers pre-application study
sessions with the Planning Commission at no cost to the applicants. These pre-application study sessions allow the applicants to gain an understanding in the City’s goals and objectives for the project site, and therefore be able to craft a project that can take advantage of the flexibility offered through the PD zoning regulations and address City issues and concerns.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-32
Appendix
D
November 2021
Table D-11: Zoning Approval Procedures
Type of Procedure
Responsible Hearing Body Notice
Required
Hearing
Required
Chapter/
DivisionSPRC ZA PC CC
Zoning Regulations
Amendment Recommend Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25
(Division I)
Zone Change Recommend Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25
(Division I)
Conditional Use Permit Decision Appeal Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division II)
Variance Decision Appeal1 Appeal1 Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division III)
Administrative Use Permit Decision Appeal1 Appeal1 Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division IV)
Site Plan Review (Initial
Hearing) Decision Decision/
Appeal2 Appeal2 No No Chapter 21.25
(Division V)
Classification of Uses Recommend Decision No No Chapter 21.25 (Division V)
Establishment of Planned
Development District Recommend Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division VII)
Special Setback Lines Recommend Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division VIII)
Local Coastal
Development Permit Decision Appeal1 Appeal1 Yes Yes Chapter 21.25 (Division IX)
Density Bonus (General
Plan) Decision Appeal Yes Yes
Determination of Applicable Law (Initial
Hearing) Decision Appeal Yes Yes Chapter 21.25
(Division XI)
Interim Park Use Permit Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25
(Division XII)
Establishment of Specific
Plans Recommend Decision Yes Yes Chapter 21.25
(Division VII)
Key:
SPRC- Site Plan Review Committee ZA- Zoning Administrator PC- Planning Commission CC- City Council Notes:
1 The Zoning Administrator may refer such application to the Planning Commission for consideration. In this case, the City Council shall serve as the appeal body.
2 Planning Commission establishes types of projects subject to Planning Commission review. Such projects can be appealed to the City Council Source: Table 21-1 (Discretionary Review Responsibilities) Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-33
DAppendix
November 2021
In addition, the SPRC has authority the to waive certain development standards, including standards that may
make a critical difference to the feasibility of a project. The list of possible waivers includes requirements for open space, courtyard dimensions, and guest parking, among
others. Specific findings are necessary for such waivers, in addition to the required findings for approval.
A.2 Development Services Center
Pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act, the Permit
Center serves as a one-stop processing counter staffed
with representatives from various City departments. In
particular, the Planning Counter processes the following:
coastal permits, standards variances, conditional use
permits, subdivision maps, certificates of compliance, lot line adjustments, and condominium conversion permits.
Permits issued by other counters at the Center include
sewer permits, health permits, and all building, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical permits for new buildings and
additions/alterations to existing buildings. In many cases, developers can apply for permits via the City’s website. By offering a consolidated services center and web access, the City can effectively reduce the costs of processing routine permits and facilitate and encourage housing production.
The City of Long Beach is committed to governance
transparency by providing all Plans, Zoning Code, Building Code online. Additionally, the Department provides
informational bulletins, online applications and forms, as well as publishes a variety of data and documentation publicly online, including status of site plan committee project reviews.
A.3 Review and Approval Timelines
The Long Beach Department of Development Services
(LBDS) defines the development review process from
application submission until the Notice of Final Action.
According to the process flowchart provided by LBDS on
the Department website in 2020, projects which require
Planning Commission approval take approximately 9.5
months without continuances or appeals, and at least
14.5 months with continuances and appeals. Project
timelines can vary and are, in part, dictated by the level of environmental analysis required. Projects requiring an EIR can take longer; projects eligible to take advantage of CEQA streamlining provisions can experience, shortened
estimated timeline.
The general procedure for processing a Planning Permit
application begins by speaking with Planning staff to find out what planning discretionary actions and environmental clearances are required, calculating the fees based off the required permits and approvals, and preparing the
necessary plans. Once the plans are submitted and the
fees are paid, staff will review the submission materials and stay in contact with the applicant if any corrections are necessary. If the project requires a public hearing, staff will provide the applicant with a laminated 30” x 40” Notice of Public Hearing poster which must be displayed on site no later than 14 days before the hearing and will provide public notice of the hearing according to the Code requirements. The number of hearings required varies but once an approval is granted, there is a 10-day appeal period before the applicant can apply for building permits.
Lengthy review periods, multiple application revisions, and delays in approval can increase the time it takes to process development applications, increasing cost of
development. As noted above, the City complies with
permit streamlining requirements and has developed a
one-stop-shop for applications in effort to reduce delays.
However, there are additional factors within the City’s control that can contribute to delays and increased costs to housing development. Most significantly, the majority of properties in the city have not yet been rezoned to
implement the 2019 LUE PlaceTypes. In these cases,
development projects that are consistent with the LUE but inconsistent with the existing zoning require a discretionary zone change to move forward. This additional zone change can lead to associated delays from a City Council hearing and potential appeals, as well as an increase in the cost of the corresponding entitlement process (for further
discussion, see Sections D.1.1.A and D.1.1.B). Program(s) 1.1 in the Housing Plan directs the City to update the zoning regulations consistent with the LUE, eliminating this
constraint. Also, SB330 The Housing Crisis Act, authorizes approval of projects consistent with the General Plan, if the zoning regulations are in conflict with the General Plan.
This will help reduce delays in approving projects under the LUE while the City updates the zoning code.
Delays can also occur through the City’s processing system.
The City’s Development Permit Center accepts applications both in person and online. Certain minor construction
projects can be reviewed in person at the public counter by appointment only, and all construction projects can
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-34
Appendix
D
November 2021
be submitted by email for plan check. According to
the City’s website, processing times for plan submittal intake up through inspection request for construction
projects will vary depending on the project type, size, and complexity, and take on average 2 to 4 months for most
construction projects that are submitted by email. The City offers faster permitting times for minor projects, such as minor additions. Multiple logistical processes within the City’s existing review systems contribute to obstacles in housing project approval. For example: staffing vacancies and turnover can lead to inconsistency in comment and
approval or delays in plan check; the existing software is inadequate and results in submittal and processing delays for applicant and staff; the inability to automate electronic plan checks increases processing time; and the difficulty in obtaining construction inspection appointments can result in occasional work site delays.
A sampling of 23 housing development projects that
were submitted to the City in the last 10 years (2010-
2020) were analyzed to calculate average processing
times at various project milestones. Based on the data, the average timeline for a housing development project
to obtain entitlement approval is 228 days. This timeline is driven by the level of review required for the projects, as well as the environmental review. The majority of the entitlements required Site Plan Review approval by the
Planning Commission at a public hearing. Additionally,
most of the projects required, at a minimum, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or a checklist to the Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) to either the
Downtown area (PD-30) or the Midtown area as projects
proposed in these areas are subject to a Program EIR. The length of time between an applicant receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application
for building permits is 255 days on average, this includes projects that were subject to appeals filed by a third party, as well as projects with requested modifications to the original approved entitlement
The average time it takes for an entitled housing
development project to obtain building permit issuance
is 922 days. The latter timeline is more than four times the amount it takes for a housing development project to be entitled, which presents significant delays in an applicant beginning construction of a housing development.
Programs to streamline the plan check process can include additional staffing resources, an applicant guide to clarify the level of detail needed in the construction document set prior to plan check submittal, as well as what is to be expected in the review process by both Building and
Safety and Planning/Zoning as the building permit review is concurrent.
B. Permit and Development Fees
B.1 Planning Fees
Development service fees charged by local governments
contribute to the cost of maintaining, developing, and
improving housing. Long Beach collects fees to recover the costs of processing permits and providing the necessary services and infrastructure related to new development.
Table D-12 summarizes the common planning fees
charged for providing associated services for new housing development.
The City conducts an annual assessment of its service fees to ensure that they reflect the cost of providing services and attempts to keep fees in line with other communities.
Fees are generally increased based on a comparative
survey and increase in the Consumer Price Index. Fees are generally not waived, because they represent the actual cost for service, are a relatively minor portion of the total building valuation, and therefore are not considered to be an undue constraint upon the production or maintenance
of housing.
An analysis of typical projects the City’s Building and Safety Bureau has found that the City’s fee structure does not unnecessarily burden multi family development. The case study analysis suggests that mixed use and affordable
developments had significantly lower permit fees as a
percentage of their overall valuation compared to single family developments Table D-13 represents a review of fees associated with Single Family, Mixed-use residential, Affordable Housing, commercial conversion and expansion to residential (involves new construction), and commercial conversion to residential (no new construction); this
includes the per-unit permit costs and total permit costs as a percent of project valuation.
In general fire / life safety permits along with permits for mechanical and structural systems were required for multiunit development. Inspection and certification of these systems are required by the building code and are reflective of the more complex systems that are required when compared with single family housing.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-35
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-13: Permit Fees
Single
Family
Mixed Use
(Residential
component)
Affordable
Housing (below
market rate)
Affordable
Housing (below
market rate)
Conversion to
Residential (no
new construction)
Total Cost per unit to
pull permits: $30,408 $8,355 $17,446 $10,810 $9,205
Total Permit Cost $30,408 $1,821,473 $697,855 $302,704 $18,411 Project Valuation: $300,000 $40,000,00 $15,000,000 $2,000,000 $57,000 Permit Cost as share of
project valuation 10% 5% 5% 15% 32%
Table D-12: Development Services Fees
Services Provided Single- and Multi-Family Units1
Administrative Use Permit $3,380.22/permit
Conditional Use Permit – Major $7,812.42 / permit
Conditional Use Permit – Minor $4,485.60/ permit
Local Coastal Development Permit – With Other Planning
Permit Required $1,105.38/ application
Local Coastal Development Permit – No Other Planning
Permit Required $2,824.86/ application
Modifications – No Hearing (SSPRC approval) $1,660.74/ modification Modifications – Zoning Administrator hearing $3,380.22/ modification Modifications – Planning Commission hearing $4,485.60/ modification Site Plan Review: Conceptual $5,537.58/ application plus $3.20/ 100 sq. ft.
Committee (staff ) Approval $6,648.30/ application plus $3.20/ 100 sq. ft.
Planning Commission Approval $10,028.52/ application plus $3.20 / 100 sq.
Standard Variance $4,485.60/ application
Zoning Amendments: Zoning Ordinance (map) $12,741.24/ zone change Tentative Maps: Condo Conversion $10,012.50 plus $181.56/ unit Final Maps: Condo Conversion $2,256.68/ application plus $175.15/ unit Vesting Final Map $2,256.68/ application plus $175.15/ unit or lot General Plan Amendment $12,741.24/ amendment
Note:
1 All fees include 6.8% surcharge
Source: City of Long Beach, Development Services Department, June 2020 Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-36
Appendix
D
November 2021
B.2 Impact Fees
In addition to planning fees, the City of Long Beach charges various development impact fees upon new development.
In contrast to service fees that recover the costs of
providing services, impact fees are intended to fund the improvements in infrastructure and services needed to
accommodate new housing development. For instance,
common examples include school fees, park and recreation fees, sewer fees, and transportation improvement fees.
Table D-14 below details these impact fees. School fees are set by the Long Beach Unified School District (LBUSD) pursuant to State legislation. The City does not assess or collect the fees on behalf of LBUSD.
To ensure that development impact fees are reasonably
related to the costs to extend infrastructure, public
services, and facilities, the City conducts a periodic nexus study that links service costs to the actual impacts of the development. However, to ensure that fees do not
constrain the production of affordable housing, the City waives development impact fees – parks and recreation
and transportation improvement fees – for housing that is dedicated as affordable to lower income households.
Table D-14: Development Impact Fees
Services Provided Fee
School Impact Fee*
Level 1 $3.79 / sq. ft.
Level 2 (New Construction) $4.14 / sq. ft.
Sewer Capacity Fee
Required on new residential, nonresidential, or change of use (when additional sewer capacity is required) development for the purpose of construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the Sewer System. $108.93
Required on new residential, nonresidential, or change of use (when additional sewer capacity is required) development as outlined in the Douglas Park Development Agreement for the purpose of construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and operation of the Sewer System.
$67.82
Fire Facilities Fee
Single-Family $496 / dwelling unit
Multi-Family $378 / dwelling unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit $241.74 / dwelling unit
Police Facilities Fee
Single-Family $703 / dwelling
Multi-Family $537 / unit
Accessory Dwelling Unit $342.86 / dwelling unit
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-37
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-14: Development Impact Fees (continued)
Services Provided Fee
Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee**
Single-Family $4,613.04 / dwelling unit
Multi-Family $3,562.78 / dwelling unit
Mobile Home Dwelling $2,619.63 / unit pad
Accessory Unit (Artist Studio, Caretakers Unit, Personage, ADU) $1,781.39 / dwelling unit Transportation Improvement Fee**
Residential $1,125.00 / dwelling unit
Accessory, up to 220 sq.ft.
Secondary, up to 640 sq.ft
$236.25 / dwelling unit
$663.75 / dwelling unit
Senior Citizen $663.00 / unit
Notes:
* Not assessed or collected by the City of Long Beach
** Exempt for housing that is affordable to low-income households Source: Development Services Department, City of Long Beach, 10/1/19 Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-38
Appendix
D
November 2021
D.1.5 Sit e Improvements
Site improvements are an important component of new
development and include water, sewer, circulation, and
other infrastructure needed to support development.
Long Beach requires pro-rata payments for off-site
extension of the water, sewer and storm drain systems,
and pro-rata payments for traffic signals. It requires the developer to construct all internal streets, sidewalks, curb, gutter, affected off-street arterials, and landscaping.
New residential construction will occur as infill, where infrastructure is in place. While these impact affordability, these requirements are deemed necessary to maintain the quality of life desired by City residents, and are consistent with the City’s General Plan goals to ensure that public services and facilities are in place at the time of need, thus avoiding the overloading of existing urban service systems.
A review of three typical projects that recently underwent the Site Plan Review process demonstrated that when
off-site conditions were imposed, conditions generally required the improvement of the public right-of-way.
For example, the projects required the improvement of
sidewalks, planting of street trees, construction of storm drain system connection, and provision of community
amenity spaces. An example of an on-site improvement
for one of these projects was the required installation of a lighted guest parking sign visible to motorists for improved public safety. The three projects reviewed ranged from 23 to 108 housing units and included Vesting Tentative Tract Maps and a zone change.
Off site improvements to the public right-of-way may
be conditioned, as deemed necessary by Public Works,
pursuant to LBMC 21.47.030. Sidewalk, parkway, curb and gutter, street tree, and bicycle trail improvements may be conditioned for any projects regardless of whether the development requires SPR, if the improvement is deemed
necessary by Public Works. The types of public right-of-way improvements required for residential projects depends
upon the number of housing units proposed, where 21
housing units is the threshold for roadway, traffic, street signage and lighting, and utility relocation improvements.
Table 47-2 of the municipal code summarizes the
dedication, reservation and improvement requirements
for all development projects. LBMC 21.47.040 provides
relief from such requirements provided that the dedication and/or improvement is not necessary for a public
purpose generated at least in part by the development
or that the cost of the dedication and/or improvement is proportionally excessive when compared to the scale of
the project or demand generated from the project.
Table 47-2 Summary of Dedication, Reservation and Improvement Requirements for All Development Projects Right-of-Way Improvements
Projects
Reservation
(applies
only to
designated
highways)
Dedication
(streets,
highways and
alleys)
Sidewalk,
Parkways, Curb
and Gutter,
Street Trees, and
Bicycle Trail
Alley Paving,
Alley
Lighting,
Utilities
Relocation
Roadway
Paving, Traffic
Signals, and
Street Signs,
Street Lights,
and Utilities
Relocation
Residential projects with 21 units
or more and all nonresidential
projects requiring Site Plan Review
- X X X X
Residential projects requiring Site
Plan Review with less than 21 units - X X X -
Projects not requiring Site Plan
Review but located on major,
minor, or secondary highway
X - X - -
All other projects - - X - -
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-39
DAppendix
November 2021
Table D-15: Housing Type (2010-2019)
Unit Type 2000 2010 2019
Units Percent Units Percent Units Percent
Single Detached 69,014 40% 74,257 42% 70,123 40%
Single Attached 10,093 6% 10,105 6% 7,675 4%
Total Single-Family 79,107 46% 84,362 48% 77,798 44%
Two to Four 23,386 14% 21,610 12% 23,821 14%
Five Plus 66,637 39% 67,418 38% 71,786 41%
Total Multi-Family 90,023 53% 89,028 51% 95,607 55%
Mobile Homes & Other 2,529 1% 2,342 1% 2,464 1%
Total Housing Units 171,659 100% 175,732 100% 175,869 100% Source: Department of Finance, Table E-5, City/County Population and Housing Estimates Section D.2 Non-Governmental
Constraints
The City is dedicated to helping meet the housing needs of all residents in Long Beach. The City’s housing stock, however, is impacted by a number of factors that can either incentivize or limit the development, maintenance, and
improvement of housing. In order to achieve its housing goals, the City reviewed these factors, which can consist of both non-governmental (i.e. market) constraints and
governmental constraints, which are within the City’s
ability to influence. This section provides a summary of the review of these non-governmental constraints.
D.2.1 H ousing Context
A. Housing Types in Long Beach
The City’s housing consists of a variety of housing types.
In 2019, Long Beach has a total of 175,869 housing units in the city, 44% of which were single-family houses, 55% of which were multi-family, and 1% of which were mobile homes.
Since 2010, overall housing stock in Long Beach has not changed, though the housing mix has shifted to fewer
single-family houses and more multi-family units. The stock of single-family houses decreased by 8%, while the stock of multi-family homes, concentrated in the Downtown, grew
by 7%, averaging about 731 new units per year citywide.
Across the City’s single-family houses, the majority are single-family detached. Less traditional forms of housing, such as mobile homes, consisted of approximately 1% of
the City’s housing stock.
B. Housing Type by Geography
Given current and historical zoning and real estate
investment patterns, certain types of housing are more
prevalent in certain areas of the city. High-density multi- family housing is concentrated in the Downtown, the Traffic Circle Area, and along Marina Pacifica. Medium- and low- density multi-family housing surrounds the Downtown
in the southern part of the city. Single family housing is largely located in the northern portion and eastern half of the city as depicted in Figure D-3.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-40
Appendix
D
November 2021
Figure D-3: Housing Type by Census Tracts
Housing Element Update 6th Cycle
Long Beach, CA
Housing Type
by Census Tract
0 0.5 1
Miles VERSION: FINALDATE: 6/17/2021 SCALE: 1 to 90,000
Source: ACS 2019 5-year estimates, Table DP04
High-Density Multifamily Attached
Medium-Density Multifamily Attached
Low-Density Multifamily Attached
Single Family Detached
No Data
Census Tracts
0 0.5 1
Miles
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-41
DAppendix
November 2021
C. Age of Housing Stock
Overall, the City has an older housing stock. 70% of
housing in Long Beach is over 50 years old, compared to just 61% across LA County. Cities with an aging housing stock need to ensure its housing does not fall into disrepair to continue to provide a healthy, safe living space. Older units have historically served as a source of market-rate naturally occurring affordable housing. This process,
known as “filtering” , requires the construction of new housing to replace the aging stock. In markets with a lack of new construction, even older housing can continue to command premium rents. There are a number of factors
that influence filtering that can contribute to a shortage of entry-level housing. This includes taxation benefits of long-term ownership of Proposition 13, which results in overconsumption of housing. Because of patterns of
urban development, older housing tends to be closer
to employment locations. With increasing pressure on
transportation systems, there is a premium on housing
locations near employment.
Table D-16: Housing Units by Year Built
Year Built
Housing
Units
Added
Total
Housing
Units
% of
Housing
1939 or earlier 39,822 23%
1940-1949 22,293 62,115 36%
1950-1959 37,932 100,047 58%
1960-1969 23,462 123,509 71%
1970-1979 21,781 145,290 84%
1980-1989 13,279 158,569 91%
1990-1999 8,747 167,316 96%
2000-2009 4,494 171,810 99%
2010 or later 1,622 173,432 100%
Source: ACS 2018 1-year Estimates, Table B25036
Figure D-5: Number of Building Permits
Source: Census Building Permits Survey
Source: ACS 1-year Estimates, Table DP04
D. Building Permit Activity
Since 2000, Long Beach has permitted a total of 8,065
units, or an average of 403 units per year. (Note: building permit figures are distinct from the number of housing
units physically constructed.) Much of the permits were issued from 2017 to 2019, during which over 2,500 units have been permitted in Long Beach, with the majority for projects permitted in the Downtown area.
E. Vacancy Rate
Despite strong housing production in the past several
years, the housing market in Long Beach continues to be strained. Evidence of increased housing pressure can be seen in the city’s vacancy rate. A low vacancy rate indicates there are too few units to meet the demand for housing.
Per real estate industry standards, healthy housing markets have a vacancy rate of 5% for rental properties and 1.5% for ownership properties. In 2018, Long Beach’s vacancy rate was 4.1% for rental properties and 0.5% for ownership properties, suggesting low inventory and greater demand for housing.
Since the 2008 Recession, vacancy rates for both ownership and rental properties have fallen below what is considered a healthy vacancy rate. As a result, prices increase and make housing unaffordable for many.
Figure D-6: Vacancy Rates
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-42
Appendix
D
November 2021
62 64
67 65
56 61
66 62
67 55
62 67
Housing Element Update 6th Cycle
Long Beach, CA
Median Unit Age
by ZIP Code
0 0.5 1
Miles VERSION: FINALDATE: 6/17/2021 SCALE: 1 to 90,000
Source: ACS 2019 5-year estimates, T able B25035
67 66
65 64
62 61
56 55
ZIP Codes
0 0.5 1
Miles
Figure D-4: Average Age of Units by Zip Code
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-43
DAppendix
November 2021
D.2.2 M arket Activity
A. Market Overview: Home Value Single Family
As of February 2020, the median home value for a single- family home in Long Beach was $666,500. After dropping
$329,100 in April 2012, Long Beach home values have
rebounded and continued rising. Since 2010, Long Beach
home values are typically slightly above but have generally kept pace with the County as a whole.
Figure D-7: Median Home
Home values range wildly across the city, from $515,000 in 90810 to $1.2 million in 90803. Home values are generally higher in the east side of Long Beach, which includes the 90803 neighborhoods of Belmont Shores and Marina
Pacifica.
Source: Zillow Home Value Index, Aug 2020
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-44
Appendix
D
November 2021
$505,700
$744,400
$514,900 $718,600
$556,800
$705,300
$1,202,500
$514,500
$583,100
$614,700
$913,400
$583,100
Housing Element Update 6th Cycle
Long Beach, CA
Home Value index
by ZIP Code
0 0.5 1
Miles VERSION: FINALDATE: 6/17/2021 SCALE: 1 to 90,000
Source: Zillow Home Value Index, Aug 2020
$505,700
$514,500
$514,900
$556,800
$583,100
$614,700
$705,300
$718,600
744400
913400
1202500
ZIP Codes
0 0.5 1
Miles
Figure D-8: Zillow Home Value Index by Zip Code
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-45
DAppendix
November 2021
Higher rents can offset the cost of development. Thus,
areas that command higher rents are more likely to attract private market-rate development. Areas with the highest rents are located in the east side, which include 90815 (Los Altos), 90803 (Belmont Shore and Marina Pacifica), and
90808 (Lakewood Village and Rancho Estates).
Figure D-9: Median Rents Over Time
B. Market Overview: Rental
Rental housing rates for Long Beach have trended similarly to the County. As shown below, the median rental unit in Long Beach in 2018 is $1,252. Since 2010, Long Beach rents grew by 21% while rents in LA County grew by 24%.
Source: ACS 5-year Estimates, Table DP04
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-46
Appendix
D
November 2021
1212
1175
1865
1832
1307
1411
1703
1147
1189
1360
1455
1189
Housing Element Update 6th Cycle
Long Beach, CA
Median Rent
by ZIP Code
0 0.5 1
Miles VERSION: FINALDATE: 6/17/2021 SCALE: 1 to 90,000
Source: ACS 2019 5-year estimates, T able DP04
1,147
1,175
1,189
1,212
1,307
1,360
1,411
1,455
1,703
1,832
1,865
ZIP Codes 0 0.5 1
Miles
Figure D-10: Median Rent by Zipcode
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-47
DAppendix
November 2021
C. Risk of Displacement
Governmental and market constraints on new
development have continually stymied housing supply,
especially affordable housing. Low levels of housing result in greater demand for available units and ultimately higher market rents. With rapidly rising rental rates across the city, residents in some areas are more at risk of displacement relative to others. The following graph depicts the
displacement risk of residents by census tract. This risk is measured through two variables: the proportion of renters paying 30% or more of their income in rent, and the
proportion of households earning 70% or less of AMI. Each census tract is grouped into three categories:
» High risk of displacement, relative to others: These
census tracts were above the median for both variables
» Moderate risk of displacement, relative to others: These census tracts were above the median for one of the
variables
» Low risk of displacement, relative to others: These
census tracts were below the median for both variables
Housing Element Update 6th Cycle
Long Beach, CA
Displacement Risk
by Census Tract
0 0.5 1
Miles VERSION: FINALDATE: 6/17/2021 SCALE: 1 to 90,000
High
Moderate
Low
No Data
Census Tracts
0 0.5 1
Miles
Figure D-11: Displacement Risk by Census Tract
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-48
Appendix
D
November 2021
Census tracts with the highest risk of displacement
(where households scored above the median on both
housing cost burden and the percentage of households
earning 70% or less of the AMI) are on the west side of Long Beach, particularly in North Long Beach, Cambodia
Town, Eastside, and East Village. This assessment generally overlaps with the geographic segregation of communities of color in Long Beach (as shown in the Needs Assessment Figure D-2).
D. Development Costs and Timing
The cost of development is one of the biggest factors
influencing the rate and type of housing produced. Major development costs include construction costs, soft costs (such as permitting costs, impact fees, and contractor fees), and the cost of land. The amount of time a developer waits between receiving entitlements and applying for building permits can also add to the cost.
D.1 Capital Costs: Hard
According to a March 2020 report published by the
Terner Center for Housing Innovation at UC Berkeley,
construction costs for multifamily housing in California have climbed 25% between 2009 and 2018. This increase
is in part due to the higher cost of building materials, such as wood, concrete, and steel, as well as prevailing wage requirements. Construction costs can vary depending on
the type of development, ranging from the most expensive steel-frame Type I construction to the more affordable
wood-frame Type V. Due to the smaller scale, single-family houses tend to be more expensive to construct on a PSF
basis than multi-family. The cost of construction in the Long Beach area is about $168 per square foot. This cost can fluctuate depending on the type and quality of amenities to the property, such as expensive interior finishes, fireplace, swimming pool, etc. In addition, hard costs can also include a demolition expense if there are existing structures on-site, or costs for land improvements that must be made before development, such as remediation or infrastructure. The cost of parking can also have a large impact on the total cost of development.
The cost of labor has also soared. The construction sector has not been able to expand to meet the demand for new
housing. The Terner Center found that, between 2009 and 2018, the number of permitted units has increased by 430 percent while the number of workers in the construction industry has only grown by 32%. In addition to the worker shortage, projects with prevailing wage requirements cost an average of $30 more per square foot. The Terner Center found that it is more expensive to build in Los Angeles (and its surrounding areas) and in the Bay Area than in other regions of California, even for similar projects.
Overall, construction costs are similar across the region, so it is not considered a constraint that is particular to the City of Long Beach. They are, however, a relevant constraint to development in the Southern California region, impacting both market-rate and below market-rate housing.
D.2 Capital Costs: Soft
Soft costs are the costs that are not directly incurred by the physical construction of the development. These
costs include services for architectural, consultant, and legal services, as well as permitting requirements and
impact fees. They generally range from 15-30% of total
development costs, but can fluctuate depending on local fees and exactions.
For a more detailed list of permit and exactions, please refer to Table D-12 and D-14.
D.3 Land Costs
The cost of land can often constrain development,
particularly if future market rents are not expected to be high enough to justify the land sale or redevelopment
opportunity. In the past, the Long Beach Redevelopment
Agency would write-down the cost of Agency-owned land
for developers in exchange for affordable housing. Since its dissolution in 2012 and the subsequent loss of funding, the City has not had a mechanism by which to reduce the cost of land for development.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-49
DAppendix
November 2021
An analysis of the aforementioned sampling showed that
approximately 39% of all residential entitlements included a lot merger or lot consolidation component. Additionally, 44% of sites in the inventory are single-parcel sites,
while another 40% only contain 2 parcels. Finally, using a front-end method of filtering out sites, staff filtered out sites with more than 3 unique property owners. Thus the City does not anticipate that lot consolidation will be a significant obstacle to development where needed for sites in the Site Inventory. The City is currently in the process of updating its Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20). One of the goals of that update is to make the lot merger process more administrative, which will reduce the processing time and cost associated with lot mergers. The change will also allow the Zoning Administrator the discretion to allow a lot tie, for example for an affordable housing is under a strict timelines.
F. Availability of Financing
The availability of financing can impact rates of home
ownership. The ability to secure financing can be
influenced by several factors, including creditworthiness, debt-to-income ratio, and the restrictiveness of mortgage lending standards. Reviewing data collected through the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) can reveal the role the lending market has had on local home sales.
Typical land cost estimates in Long Beach range between $30 to $70 per square foot. The cost of land is similarly high across the Southern California region. In Long Beach, much of the land cost is driven by the reverence of single- family home development, constraining net new housing
supply and propelling property values. Higher land costs can impede development feasibility to produce lower cost housing due to prevailing rental rates.
D.4 Development and Timing
A sampling of 23 housing development projects that were submitted to the City in the last 10 years (2010-2020) were analyzed to calculate average processing times at various project milestones. Based on the data, the average timeline for a housing development project to obtain entitlement approval is 228 days. The length of time between an
applicant receiving approval for a housing development
and submittal of an application for building permits is 255 days on average, this includes projects that were
subject to appeals filed by a third party, as well as projects with requested modifications to the original approved
entitlement.
Table D-17: Home Loan Approvals
2019 2011
Total
Applications
%
Approved
%
Denied
%
Withdrawn
or
Incomplete
Total
Applications
%
Approved
%
Denied
%
Withdrawn
or
Incomplete
Government-
backed 791 74% 9% 17% 1,899 72.2% 13.1% 14.6%
Conventional 3,863 75% 7% 18% 2,737 75.7% 12.2% 12.1%
Refinancings 11,380 64% 14% 22% 10,962 66.8% 19.2% 14.0% Home
Improvement 1,289 42% 44% 14% 464 57.3% 29.5% 13.1%
Source: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, 2019 Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-50
Appendix
D
November 2021
The total number of government-backed and conventional
loan applications in 2019 is similar to the total in 2011.
However, the economic recovery since the Recession has
led to an uptick in the number of conventional loans and a lessened reliance on government ones. Compared to the home loan data collected in the prior housing element,
the number of government-backed mortgage applications
more than halved, from 1,899 in 2011 to 791 in 2019.
During the same period, conventional loans increased 41% from 2,737 in 2011 to 3,863 in 2019. The increased number of conventional loans may also be due to the maximum
allowable mortgage delineated by the federal government that may be lower than the market rate-cost of housing in Long Beach.
The approval rates of both the government-backed and
conventional loans is about 75%, which is comparable to the rates in 2011.
In competitive housing environments when purchasing a
new home may be out of reach for some, home renovations can be a desirable and more affordable way to add value to property. The number of home improvement applications
rose 178% from 464 in 2011 to 1,289 in 2019. Despite the larger appetite, approval rates dropped to just 42% from 67% eight years ago.
The HMDA data suggests a lack of a linear relationship
between the percentage of non-white population in a
community and the rate of home loan denials in the city of Long Beach. When subjected to an ordinary least squares regression, the data indicated a correlation coefficient (R-squared) of 6%. Note: the demographic data reflects
the area for which a home loan was applied, and not
demographic data of the applicant.
Source: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, 2019
Figure D-12: Home Loan Denials vs. Non-White Population by Census Tract
While HMDA data was initially collected to determine the extent of racial discrimination in the mortgage lending industry, much of the discrimination now is more subtle than the use of racial covenants and redlining by financial institutions from decades prior. Today, many minority
applicants face higher interest rates and refinance fees than white borrows. This type of discrimination may not be visible in the HMDA data.
G. Foreclosures
Foreclosures have declined since its peak in 2008. In 2018, Long Beach had 58 foreclosures.
Figure D-13: Foreclosures in Long Beach since 2000
The impact of COVID-19 on the housing market is as of
yet to be determined, but the number of foreclosures may increase in tandem with the high rates of unemployment
or the high rates of rent non-payment across the country, which could prevent borrowers from paying their mortgage on-time.
Appendix | Housing Constraints
D-51
DAppendix
November 2021
Section D.3 En vironmental and
Infrastructure Constraints
Environmental issues and infrastructure capacity or other limitations could possibly affect the type and amount
of residential development in a given location. If not
addressed, these types of constraints could preclude a
jurisdiction from facilitating the development of housing that is needed to meet its RHNA assignment. None of
the sites being used to address the City’s new RHNA
targets have environmental or infrastructure constraints.
Nevertheless, this section addresses the environmental and infrastructure constraints in the City of Long Beach and the actions that have been taken to mitigate these constraints with regard to the potential development of housing.
D.3.1 C ity Infrastructure
Long Beach was incorporated 133 years ago in 1888. Today, the City is highly urbanized and fully developed. The only remaining theoretically developable parcels (assuming
that parks, beaches, and wetlands will be preserved) are either brown fields or other lands that can be recycled for new uses. No new streets are needed; water, sewer and
power lines service all properties.
The City has demonstrated that there is sufficient existing and planned infrastructure capacity, including water,
wastewater treatment services, stormwater drainage,
telecommunications facilities, and solid waste to facilitate the City’s RHNA. This capacity was demonstrated through the 2019 Land Use Element (LUE) Program Environmental
Impact Report (PEIR), and subsequently analyzed as part of the LUE PEIR Addendum prepared for 6th Cycle Housing Element Update. The LUE PEIR confirmed sufficient capacity for the LUE anticipated buildout of 28,524 housing units, and the proposed Housing Element update is designed to
facilitate a smaller but similar number of future housing units (the RHNA allocation of 26,502 units) already
identified and contemplated through the approved LUE,
in the same general locations focusing new housing near transit and along commercial corridors.
The analysis for the Housing Element found that the
increase in expected water demand under the proposed
project would be the same as the LUE and water supplies under the proposed project are expected to be sufficient to meet all demands through the horizon year 2040 during normal, single dry year, and multiple dry year hydrologic conditions. In terms of wastewater impacts, the demand
for wastewater treatment services related to construction of new housing facilitated by the Housing Element and LUE would be temporary, would generate minimal wastewater,
and impacts would be less than significant. The increase in the wastewater flow during operation for an additional 28,524 housing units represents approximately 4 percent of the remaining capacity of existing County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD) facilities and
therefore can be accommodated. The City also has adequate storm drain system capacity to handle impacts related to stormwater drainage during construction and operation
of projects facilitated by the Housing Element Update and future rezoning. In terms of wireless telecommunications facilities, the City has sufficient capacity to accommodate future development proposed under the proposed
project and similar to the existing market conditions,
Spectrum Communications, Frontier Communications,
and AT&T U-Verse would extend existing services to meet the increased demand for telephone, internet, and cable services as future developments are proposed. Lastly,
sufficient landfill capacity exists in the region to serve solid waste generated by projects facilitated by the HEU.
There are no known constraints with respect to needed
infrastructure able to support additional housing
development. However, like most developed communities,
one of the City’s major challenges is to maintain this
infrastructure in good condition and working at optimal levels to serve the needs of residents and businesses. The long and short term Capital Improvement Programs are
designed to address these maintenance concerns.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
D-52
Appendix
D
November 2021
D.3.2 G eologic Conditions
Located directly adjacent to and between the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, with eight miles of coastline, the City is situated on a coastal plain with relatively unstable soils (i.e., terrace deposits). The potential for flooding and liquefaction are an ongoing concern for the City,
and steps have been taken to mitigate these hazards. For instance, following the discovery of oil here in the 1920s, by the 1950s areas along the downtown and in the port
experienced severe subsidence when oil and gas resources were extracted. In 1958, a full-scale water injection system was initiated to repressurize and stabilize these areas.
With this Wilmington Oil Field underlying the coastline a very important national resource, and oil operations
continuing for the foreseeable future, this water injection system is maintained to protect the developments on the surface above – including a lot of new housing recently constructed in the City’s downtown. Similarly, following severe storms and flooding in the City’s early history, an extensive breakwater was constructed to protect lives
and properties situated on the peninsula and along the
shoreline. Although studies are planned to examine the
reconfiguration of this breakwater in order to allow more surf and better offshore water quality, it is not expected that alterations to the breakwater would impact any
potential development sites.
Although potential land subsidence is an issue, the most pervasive geologic hazard in Long Beach is that of an
earthquake. The City is bisected diagonally across the
center by the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone. Again,
because of the relatively unstable soils beneath the surface in some areas, a major earthquake along this fault could cause widespread devastation. In fact, the City experienced such a quake in 1933 where lives were lost and many
buildings destroyed. Learning from that episode, the City has developed a reputation for applying strict building standards, and initiating and supporting State legislation to protect lives and property from potential earthquake damage. The Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone Act of
1973 was adopted to mitigate the potential impacts from an earthquake by requiring buildings to be set back from the fault zone. Further, several years ago levees along both the San Gabriel and Los Angeles Rivers were raised and improved to mitigate exposure to flooding should
an earthquake occur. Portions of Long Beach have been
evaluated for flood risk.
Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-1
EAppendix
November 2021
Appendix E: Review of Past Accomplishments
Program-Specific Review
Table E-1 below reviews the City’s progress in implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element. Table E-2 at the end summarizes the City’s progress toward the quantified objectives established in the 2013-2021 Housing Element.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Assistance to, and Preservation of, Affordable Units Preservation of
At-Risk Unit
Annually monitor status of the 1,600
affordable housing units in 21 projects
that are at risk of converting to market rate.
Seek to preserve these affordable units for
extremely low income households and
very low income households.
In the event that a property is scheduled
for conversion, coordinate with the
property owner to ensure that proper
noticing is circulated to the at-risk tenants
and that tenant education is provided
regarding their options, such as other
affordable housing developments and
City programs, and special HUD Section
8 vouchers for tenants displaced due to
expiration of project-based Section 8
assistance.
In the event that a property is scheduled for
conversion, contact qualified, non-profit
entities, from the State’s qualified entities
list, to inform them of the opportunity to
acquire affordable units. Also inform them
of financial assistance available through
City, State, and federal programs.
In the event that a property is scheduled
for conversion, explore the possibility of
using available housing funds to acquire
or facilitate the acquisition of the units to
preserve affordability.
Support the property owners’ application
for tax credits or other funding sources that
would extend the properties’ affordability
period.
Support the property owners’ application
for Section 8 contract renewal with HUD.
Ongoing
Since 2014, a total of 1,017 affordable
units in the following projects has been
preserved and extended for an additional
55 years:
» New Hope Home: Preservation of 140
Senior Units. Development Services
(DS) supported and assisted with
funding applications.
» Sea Mist Tower, 1451 Atlantic:
Preservation of 75 Senior Veteran Units.
DS amended previous agreements, and
supported and assisted with funding
applications.
» Covenant Manor, 600 E. 4th Street:
Preservation of 100 Senior Units. DS
amended previous agreements, and
supported and assisted with funding
applications.
» Brethren Manor, 3333 Pacific:
Preservation of 295 Senior Units. Health
and Human Services (HHS) provided
tenant protection vouchers and
coordinated with the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD). DS supported and assisted with
funding applications.
» American Goldstar Manor, 3021
Goldstar Drive: Preservation of 283
Senior Veteran Units. HHS provided
tenant protection vouchers and
coordinated with HUD.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-2
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Assistance to, and Preservation of, Affordable Units (continued) Preservation of
At-Risk Unit
Extend affordability through acquisition/
rehabilitation efforts.
Provide tenant education and information
on special Section 8 voucher assistance
set aside by the HACLB for residents
displaced or impacted by the conversion
of federally assisted housing projects.
Ongoing
» Beachwood Apartments, 475 W.
5th Street and 505 West 6th Street:
Preservation of 45 Family and Disabled
Units. Rehabilitation began in
December 2017. DS/The LBCIC provided
$2.1 million in funding, amended
previous agreements, supported and
assisted with funding applications, and
provided $246,522 in Developer Impact
Fee waivers.
» Sara’s Apartments, 240 W. 7th Street:
Preservation of 29 Disabled and
Senior Units. DS amended previous
agreements, supported and assisted
with funding applications, and
facilitated the provision of Project‐
Based Vouchers for the project.
» Federation Tower Apartments, 3799
E. Willow Street: Preservation of
50 Disabled and Senior Units. DS
supported and assisted with funding
applications.
The City maintains a list of all assisted
housing developments within the City and
continues to work with property owners to
renew their participation in the Section 8
program.
Housing Choice
Voucher (aka
Section 8 Rental
Assistance)
Encourage property owners to accept
Housing Choice Vouchers, including
working with owners of new rental
developments.
Seek to raise the payment standard to
expand the stock of eligible rentals, when
necessary.
Ongoing
The Housing Authority currently has
an allocation of 6,713 Housing Choice
Vouchers. Average utilization of allocated
vouchers was 85 percent in 2017 and 2018
and over 90 percent in 2019, and funds in
excess of 100 percent of the Authorized
Budget Authority were spent. Efforts to
encourage owner acceptance are ongoing.
For the 2021-2029 Housing Element,
Outreach and education will be expanded
to promote the new State law on source of
income protection (SB 329 and SB 222).
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-3
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Assistance to, and Preservation of, Affordable Units (continued) First Right of
Refusal for
Displaced
Lower Income
Households
By 2016, explore local options to extend
first right of refusal to lower income
households displaced by private
development. Survey other cities to
benchmark their requirements for first
right of refusal. Report findings to the
Planning Commission and City Council in
2017 as part of the Annual Report to HCD
for Housing Element Implementation.
Factors to be evaluated may include, but
are not limited to:
» Applicable projects (minimum size of
projects subject to the requirement);
» Income levels of displaced tenants and
if priority should be established;
» Terms and conditions offered; and
» Length of offer.
2016
In 2017, Development Services (DS) staff
began working with the City Attorney’s
office to include first right of refusal for
displaced lower-income households
in pending updates to the Coastal
Zone In-Lieu Fee Ordinance and the
Condominium Conversion Ordinance.
In 2019, DS conducted public outreach
relating to the pending updates, including
surveys of other cities’ coastal zone lower‐
income housing ordinances. The update
to this policy was recommended by the
Planning Commission on October 1,
2020 and was presented before the City
Council January 19, 2021. The Mello Act
revisions were refined to align with the
City’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and
the updated Mello Act provisions and fees
were adopted by City Council on July 13,
2021. With the passage of AB 1482 in 2019,
the City Council instructed staff to work
on a new Tenant Relocation Assistance
Ordinance that will be consistent with
state law.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-4
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing for Special Needs Residents
Continuum of
Care
Develop new efficiency units on remaining
land at the Villages at Cabrillo with at least
half of these units targeted to extremely
low income households and the remainder
targeted to very low income households.
Continue to support services and programs
that are part of the Continuum of Care
system for the homeless through the City’s
annual funding allocation process.
Ongoing
The City and its community partners
continue to provide 1,679 Emergency/
Transitional program beds, Permanent
Supportive Housing with a capacity of
854 persons (beds), and Rapid Rehousing
for 28 persons. Overall, the City’s housing
inventory for the homeless is 2,561
beds. Furthermore, the Century Village
at Cabrillo is the process of updating its
master plan to expand housing on site.
In June 2017, DS received a $491,233 grant
from HUD for the FY 2017/2018 Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG) Program to increase
the effectiveness of the ESG program and
facilitate the connection with the Long
Beach CoC, DS coordinates with HHS to
administer and oversee the program. ESG
funds provide support to two emergency
shelter programs, street outreach and
Rapid Rehousing services for homeless
households.
In February 2019, HHS was awarded
$8,467,853 in 2018 CoC grant funding
by HUD. The 2018 CoC award provided
one‐year funding to support 20 currently
operating projects providing a mixture
of housing and supportive services and
two projects for strategic planning and
enhanced monitoring activities.
In 2020, the City also received $8.1 million
in CDBG-CV and $15.3 million in ESG-CV
funds from HUD to address the impacts of
the Coronavirus. Initial funding focuses on
providing emergency housing assistance
to prevent homelessness. Implementation
of these programs are underway.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-5
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing for Special Needs Residents (continued)
Zoning Code
Update for
Special Needs
Housing
Emergency Shelters: In 2013, the City
amended the Zoning Code to permit
emergency shelters by right via a
ministerial approval process in the Port – IP
zone and in PD-31 (Villages at Cabrillo). The
City will explore additional opportunities
for allowing emergency shelters in
PD-29 and the IL (Light Industrial) zone.
Potential inclusion of sites for emergency
shelters will be evaluated as part of the
PD-29 Specific Plan update in 2014.
Inclusion of emergency shelters in the IL
zone or as an overlay in portions of the
IL zone will be recommended in 2015.
Factors to consider include availability
of vacant and underutilized properties,
access to supportive services and public
transportation, as well as compatibility
with surrounding uses. Annually, monitor
the effectiveness of the various zones for
by-right emergency shelters and pursue
alternative strategies as necessary.
Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing: By
the end of 2014, amend the Zoning Code
to incorporate SRO housing under the
provisions for Special Group Residence.
Conditions for approval will be objective
and pertain to performance standards
such as parking, management, and
security. Such conditions will be similar
to those required for other Special Group
Residence uses in the same zone.
Definition of Family: Amend the Zoning
Code by the end of 2014 to revise the
definition of family to “any group of
individuals living together based on
personal relationships. ”
2014
Emergency shelters are allowed by right in
the Port‐Related Industrial Zoning District.
The City continues to monitor its zoning
regulations to ensure the provision of
a range of housing options to the City’s
special needs population.
In 2020, the City adopted a zoning code
update to increase the areas where
emergency shelters and other interim
housing uses are permitted. Additionally,
the City has recently updated the zoning
code to add new definitions, as well as
update existing ones, for uses related to
interim housing and allow said uses in
more districts. Examples of these include
safe parking sites and social service offices.
In 2015, the Zoning Code was amended
to include a definition of SRO and include
SRO housing under the definition of
Special Group Residence.
In 2015, the Zoning Code was amended to
revise the definition of family.
The City has also recently updated its
Zoning Code to address the provision
of special needs housing relating to
Low Barrier Navigation Center (AB
101), Emergency Shelter (AB 139), and
Supportive Housing (AB 2162).
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-6
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing for Special Needs Residents (continued)
Family Self
Sufficiency
Continue to implement the Family
Self-Sufficiency Program.
Promote program at City website,
newsletters, and brochures at public
counters.
Ongoing
In 2019, 17 participants graduated from
the program, and a total of $857,159 in
escrow funds were disbursed. A total of
484 participants have completed this
program to date. This program can serve
up to 674 participants.
HOPWA Tenant-
Based Rental
Assistance
Continue to provide assistance to
108 households through the HOPWA
Long-Term Tenant-Based Rental
Assistance and 120 households through
the Short-Term Assistance Program.
Petition for increased funding for program.
Promote program at City website,
newsletters, and brochures at public
counters.
Ongoing
In 2019, the HACLB was awarded $1.25
million in grant funds for the HOPWA
program. There are currently a total of 46
households receiving rental assistance and
supportive services/case management.
Universal
Design
Evaluate the feasibility of providing
additional density bonuses or other
incentives for new developments that
include universal design (beyond required
ADA standards) by 2017 as part of the
tri-annual update of the Building Code.
2017
The updated Land Use Element and
Urban Design Element, adopted in 2019,
integrate universal design into the policy
framework for future development of the
City. The City will further evaluate bonuses
or requirements for universal design
through building code updates to occur
as a result of Land Use and Urban Design
Elements implementation.
HOME Security
Deposit
Assistance
Provide security deposit assistance to
350 homeless households. This program
benefits primarily extremely low income
households.
Promote program to nonprofit service
providers.
Ongoing
This program assists between 20 and 40
households annually over the last four
years. While the number of households
assisted annually has decreased in recent
years due to funding availability and
difficulty in locating affordable housing,
this program remains an important
component of the City’s overall housing
strategy.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-7
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing for Special Needs Residents (continued)
VASH (Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing)
Lease up all 495 allocated vouchers by
2014 and pursue additional funding in the
future.
2014 /
Ongoing
HACLB continues to work closely with
the local VA office that provides referrals
to the rental assistance program. HACLB
currently administers 830 VASH vouchers
with an average lease rate of 80 percent.
For the 2021-2029 Housing Element,
Outreach and education will be expanded
to promote the new State law on source of
income protection (SB 329 and SB 222).
Continuum of
Care Permanent
Supportive
Housing
Continue to provide voucher assistance to
disabled veterans and pursue additional
funding in the future.
Ongoing
HACLB continues to work closely with
US Veterans Initiative and Mental Health
America placing hard to serve persons
with disabilities through Continuum of
Care grants. Of the 94 rental assistance
vouchers allocated for SPC and SNAP , 32 of
these vouchers have been designated to
US Vets and 62 vouchers to Mental Health
America. Specifically, 75 units were leased
in 2019, and the lease up rate for the COC
program was 80 percent.
Project-Based
Vouchers
Continue to utilize project-based vouchers
to provide affordable housing for youth
aging out of the foster care system,
homeless households, and lower income
households.
Ongoing
HACLB continues to award project-based
vouchers in the following projects:
American Gold Star Manor (Seniors &
Veterans), Cabrillo Gateway (Homeless
& Disabled), Long Beach & 21st (Seniors),
Palace Apartments (Emancipated Foster
Youth 18-23 yrs. old)
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-8
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing and Neighborhood Improvement
Home
Rehabilitation
Provide rehabilitation assistance to 3,032
households (up to 80% AMI) as following:
» 250 households with Owner-Occupied
Rehabilitation Loans
» 350 households with Multi-Family
Rehabilitation Loans
» 2,000 households with Home
Improvement Rebates
» 32 households with Mobile Home
Repair Grants
» 400 households with Tool Rental
Assistance
Promote programs via City newsletters,
website, and brochures at public counters.
Pursue additional funding at State and
Federal levels to support rehabilitation
activities.
Ongoing
As of FY 2019, the City assisted over 300
single‐family and mobile home owners
with rehabilitation loans:
» 245 Single‐Family Rehabilitation Loans
completed
» 54 Mobile Home Rehabilitation Loans
completed
In June 2017, the State withdrew remaining
funds for the CalHome Rehabilitation Loan
Program. The City continued processing
applicants who were approved before
this time and completed all loans through
FY19.
Since 2014, a total of 156 units in 13
projects have been rehabilitated through
the Multi‐Family Rehabilitation Loan
Program.
All funding was expended for the Mobile
Home Repair Grant program as of 2019. In
total, 20 mobile home repair grants were
completed.
The City no longer provides a direct Tool
Rental Assistance Program and instead
allows property owners to request a
reimbursement for rented tools as part of
the Home Improvement Rebate Program.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-9
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing and Neighborhood Improvement (continued)
Neighborhood
Resources
As funding permits, continue to support
neighborhood and community groups
with services and technical support.
Advertise services available via City
website and newsletter.
Ongoing
The City continues to provide annual
funding to the Neighborhood Resource
Center. Annually, close to 40,000 residents
are assisted with a variety of programs
and services. Specifically, through the
Neighborhood Resource Center, the
City assists neighborhood associations
and community groups. Services
included providing neighborhood
publication assistance, neighborhood
project assistance, providing supplies
for neighborhood projects and events,
access to meeting room space, and the
community computer lab.
The City’s Place-Based Neighborhood
Improvement Strategy (PBNIS) will be
incorporated into the 2021-2029 Housing
Element.
Comprehensive
Code
Enforcement
Continue to perform inspections and
train residents in nuisance abatement
procedures.
Inspect an average of 5,500 multi-family
units annually to correct code violations.
Connect City housing rehabilitation
programs with code enforcement efforts
to ensure assistance is provided to lower
income households in making the code
corrections and improvements.
Conclude research on rental escrow
program, Franchise Tax Board Substandard
Housing program, and other alternative
approaches, and report findings to the
City Council by the end of 2014. Research
should include an analysis on the nature
and extent of code violations and extent of
persistent non-compliance. Each program
option will be evaluated based on factors
such as cost implications, effectiveness,
and administrative burden. By the end
of 2015, develop a strategy to implement
one or more of the program options that
focus on addressing habitability issues.
Ongoing
2014-2015
The Proactive Rental Housing Inspection
Program ordinance has been in place since
2015. This ordinance addresses habitability
issues through a proactive approach in
which the City identifies issues without
residents having to call to complain.
The City’s Intensive Code Enforcement
programs work with the Place-Based
Neighborhood Improvement Strategy
to address blighting conditions in these
neighborhoods.
The City’s Place-Based Neighborhood
Improvement Strategy (PBNIS) will be
incorporated into the 2021-2029 Housing
Element.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-10
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing and Neighborhood Improvement (continued)
Neighborhood
Improvement
Services
Continue to implement various
neighborhood improvement programs,
such as Neighborhood Partners,
Urban Forestry, Home Improvement
Rebates, Neighborhood Clean Up, and
Neighborhood Leadership.
Ongoing
Annually, the Home Improvement Rebate
Program completed exterior repairs and
upgrades for about 130 to 150 households.
The Neighborhood Leadership Program
creates a substantial leverage of CDBG
funding in additional human capital and
community support. This investment in the
capacity building of residents, primarily
from CDBG‐eligible neighborhoods,
continues to pay dividends in the form
of residents’ enhanced ability to improve
their neighborhoods even ten years after
graduation from the program.
The Neighborhood Partners Program
was rolled into the Place‐Based
Neighborhood Improvement Strategy
(PBNIS) as part of 2017-2021 HUD Five
Year Consolidated Plan. PBNIS leverages
existing CDBG programs and new funding
to implement thoughtful infrastructure
and beautification projects in five selected
areas of the City.
The Housing and Neighborhood Services
Bureau’s Urban Forestry program
continues to implement the “I Dig Long
Beach – 6,000 Trees by 2020” initiative and
has expanded the initiative with a $1.26
million grant from CAL FIRE.
Foreclosure
Registry
Ongoing implementation of the
Foreclosure Registry Ordinance. Ongoing
With the unknown long-term economic
impacts of COVID-19, foreclosures
may increase in the upcoming years,
requiring continued efforts in foreclosure
prevention. However, this registry is not
included in the Housing Element as a
specific housing program.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-11
EAppendix
November 2021
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing and Neighborhood Improvement (continued)
Lead-Based
Paint Hazard
Abatement
The LHC Program has established the
following work program for FY 2012 – FY
2015:
» Enroll 205 housing units into the
program and obtain owner consent to
inspect units for lead hazards.
» Conduct assessment on 195 units.
» Complete abatement for 185 units.
» Conduct 20 outreach events.
Ongoing
The LHC Program completed the FY 2015 –
FY 2018 program and was awarded a new
grant of $4.1 million for lead hazard control
in low‐income housing throughout the
City for FY 2019‐2022. In the last program:
» Cumulative lead assessments were
conducted in 207 low‐income
residential units for the 2015‐2018
grant period, 44 assessments in 2018.
» Lead abatement was completed in 198
units for the 2015‐ 2018 grant period,
69 units were abated in calendar year
2018.
» To build public awareness regarding
the lead abatement program, staff
participated in more than 50 outreach
events.
The LHC Program has established the
following work program for FY 2019 – FY
2022:
» Enroll 205 housing units into the
program and obtain owner consent to
inspect units for lead
» hazards.
» Conduct assessments on 205 units.
» Complete abatements on 200 units.
» In 2019, 21 units were enrolled and
abatement on 2 units was completed.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-12
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Production
Affordable
Housing
Development
Assistance
Annually monitor availability of State
and federal funding and partner with
affordable housing developers, if
necessary, in applying for additional funds.
Identify qualified nonprofit developers
for partnership in affordable housing
construction and acquisition/
rehabilitation projects.
Prepare and implement a Housing Action
Plan (HAP) in 2015. The HAP will cover a
range of topics, including the following:
» Address the potential uses of a variety
of funding sources available to the
City (see Program 4.4, Housing Funds).
Specifically, establish a priority in which
the City should use available funds to
assist in the rehabilitation of existing
housing stock or for investing in new
construction projects
» Establish a strategy for the development
of sites currently owned by the LBCIC,
particularly those in transit-oriented
neighborhoods.
» Establish target populations for various
programs, i.e. senior, disabled, veterans,
families, etc.
» Devise appropriate strategies for
different neighborhoods.
» Incorporate a priority for funding
to preserve and promote housing
affordable to lower income households
in transit rich neighborhoods and
other targeted growth areas, and
update the HAP every five years or as
needed thereafter to reflect changes in
conditions and new opportunities.
Ongoing
2015
The City completed the Housing Action
Plan (HAP) in 2016, which outlined the
priority in utilizing the Housing Successor
Agency funds and agency-owned
properties. All six properties identified in
the HAP have been disposed for residential
development.
The City’s Housing Assets funds have been
allocated. The City will be developing a
plan, specifically on the use of inclusionary
housing in-lieu fee.
Staff continued to monitor federal and
state funding programs, specifically the
Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities program, CalHOME program,
and Permanent Local Housing Allocation
program. The Long Beach Community
Investment Company (LBCIC) continues to
provide assistance to housing developers.
Recent Projects:
» Vistas Del Puerto Apartments ‐ 48 units
for families & homeless households.
LBCIC provided $2.825M in funding.
» Las Ventanas ‐ 101 units for low‐ and
very‐low income households. LBCIC
provided $3.5M in funding and assisted
in successful application for $13.976M
in AHSC funding.
» The Spark at Midtown ‐ 95 units for
homeless & family households. LBCIC
provided $3 million in funding.
» The Beacon ‐ 160 units for veteran/
senior households. LBCIC provided
$12.3M in funding.
» Washington Homes ‐ Acquisition
and rehabilitation of a single‐family
residence housing three individuals
with developmental disabilities earning
up to 50% of AMI. DS/LBCIC provided
$252,800 in funding.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-13
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Production (continued)
Affordable
Housing
Development
Assistance
(continued)
Continue to provide funding to help
gap-finance affordable housing. Priority
in funding is granted to projects housing
special needs groups (such as the elderly
and the disabled, including those with
developmental disabilities) and/or
enriched with supportive services such as
childcare, health programs, job training,
and financial and legal counseling.
Recent Projects (continued):
» Redondo Homes ‐ Acquisition and
Rehabilitation of five units for individuals
with developmental disabilities earning
50% AMI. DS/LBCIC provided $875,920
in funding.
Underway
» 14th Street between Pine/Pacific
– 11 Units (For Sale – Family). The
LBCIC approved a Disposition and
Development Agreement with Habitat
for Humanity and a loan in the amount
of $990,000 to the project.
» 469 West Apartments (Magnolia &
PCH) – 40 units of homeless/extremely
low‐ income housing proposed. The
LBCIC approved a Disposition and
Development Agreement with LINC
Housing and a loan in the amount of
$2,250,000 to the project.
» 1500 E. Anaheim Street – 88 Units
(Rental – Family & Special Needs). The
LBCIC approved a $4,000,000 Loan
Agreement with BRIDGE Housing.
» Woodbridge Apartments (1117 Elm
Avenue and 421 W. 33rd Street) – 49
Units (Rental – Family). The LBCIC
approved a $1,100,000 Loan Agreement
with Century Affordable Housing
Development.
» 9th Street Homes ‐ Acquisition of
a single‐family residence housing
four individuals with developmental
disabilities earning 50% AMI. DS/LBCIC
to provide $151,676 in funding.
» Sunfield Homes ‐ Acquisition of a
single‐family residence housing
four individuals with developmental
disabilities earning 50% AMI. DS/LBCIC
to provide $150,000 in funding.
» Keynote Homes ‐ Acquisition of a
single‐family residence housing
four individuals with developmental
disabilities earning 50% AMI. DS/LBCIC
to provide $150,000 in funding.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-14
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Production (continued)
Affordable
Housing
Development
Assistance
(continued)
Underway (continued)
» Clark Apartments ‐ 7 units (Rental ‐
Special Needs) ‐ LBCIC approved a
$1,180,000 loan agreement with HOPE
to provide housing to individuals with
developmental disabilities earning 50%
AMI.
Adequate Sites
Maintain an adequate sites inventory for
the remaining RHNA of 7,048 units (886
extremely low income units; 887 very low
income units; 1,066 low income units;
1,170 moderate income units; and 3,039
above moderate income units).
Identify additional opportunities for
housing through updates to the following:
Land Use Element and PD-29 by 2014.
Monitor development trends to ensure
availability of sites for residential uses.
Provide sites inventory to interested
developers and to assist in identifying
additional opportunities for residential
development.
Provide technical and financial assistance
to developers of low and moderate
income housing.
Ongoing
2014
Ongoing
The City continues to track and maintain an
adequate sites inventory for the remaining
RHNA. The Long Beach Housing Dash
Boards track the City’s progress in meeting
its Housing Element targets.
In 2017, the City Council adopted a set
of 29 policy recommendations relating
to revenue tools and incentives for the
production of affordable and workforce
housing, after a public outreach and policy
development process led by the Mayor’s
Affordable and Workforce Housing Study
Group and assisted by City staff.
The Land Use Element update, adopted in
December 2019, includes potential new
housing opportunities along commercial
corridors as well as increased density
opportunities within some existing
multifamily housing areas. The Midtown
Specific Plan was adopted in 2016 (an
update of PD‐29), and encourages
medium to high‐density transit‐oriented
development along Long Beach Boulevard,
particularly surrounding Metro Rail
(A-Line) stops. These efforts will increase
housing opportunities and locate housing
near transportation, employment, goods
and services.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-15
EAppendix
November 2021
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Production (continued)
Adequate Sites
(continued) Ongoing
In July 2020, the City Council adopted
an Inclusionary Housing Policy which
will apply to residential projects starting
construction after January 1, 2021 within
the Downtown area.
As part of the 2021-2029 Housing
Element update, the City undertook a
comprehensive and elaborate review of
its vacant and underutilized sites with
potential for residential development.
Adaptive Reuse
Adopt revisions to the Municipal Code
in 2014 to encourage adaptive reuse
and once adopted, promote adaptive
reuse to property owners and interested
developers.
2014
The adaptive reuse program became
effective January 1, 2014, as part of the new
Building Standards Code. The Adaptive
Reuse Program and Ordinance streamlines
the development process for the adaptive
reuse of existing historic structures. Reuse
of the Edison building is a recent example
of adaptive reuse in Long Beach. The City
aggressively markets the program and
assists developers through the process.
Affordable
Housing
Funding
Opportunities
On an annual basis as part of the City’s
budget process, the City will regularly
evaluate opportunities to direct funding
to the Housing Fund.
In accordance with AB 1484, establish
an amortization schedule to repay
approximately $16.3 million in debt owed
the Housing Fund from the Downtown
Project area related to deferred housing
set-aside payments by early 2014, subject
to approval by the State Department of
Finance.
In accordance with AB 1484, establish
an amortization schedule by the end of
2014 to repay approximately $8.1 million
in debt owed the Housing Fund from the
former Redevelopment Agency related
to the advance of funds as allowed by AB
x4 26 (SERAF), subject to approval by the
State Department of Finance.
2014
2014
As of 2016, all of the SERAF debt has
been repaid to the Housing Fund. In FY
2016, the final payment was made on the
Downtown Project Area debt, providing a
full repayment to the Housing Fund.
In FY 2016, the Successor Agency and
Oversight Board authorized the former
Redevelopment Agency Debt to the
City as an enforceable obligation, and
submitted it to the State Department of
Finance for approval. Twenty percent of
any repayments of the City debt must
be deposited into the Housing Fund.
Disbursements have been deposited into
the Housing Fund in FY16 and FY17 and
will continue through 2019.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-16
Appendix
E
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Housing Production (continued)
Affordable
Housing
Funding
Opportunities
(continued)
AB 1484 allows a former redevelopment
agency to repay loans received from its
host city. Under AB 1484, when this debt
is reestablished and payments begin, a
portion of the loan repayment, no less
than 20%, must be used for low and
moderate income housing purposes. The
City of Long Beach intends to reestablish
this debt by 2020, subject to approval by
the State Department of Finance.
By the end of 2015, research potential
redirection of condominium conversion
fees for deposit into the Housing Trust
Fund. On an annual basis, research eligible
funding sources, including State Prop 1C
programs, for deposit into the Housing
Trust Fund.
By the end of 2015, conduct a financial
analysis and nexus study to review the
viability of the Coastal Zone in-lieu fee
and consider revisions to the fee structure,
if necessary, as part of the FY2016-2017
budget process and master fee schedule
update.
Annually monitor the availability of State
and federal funding and pursue additional
funding as appropriate. Continue
to partner with affordable housing
developers and other supportive service
providers in funding applications.
2020
2015
Ongoing
2015
Ongoing
In December 2018, the City Council
adopted recommendations prepared by
the Everyone Home Task Force to address
homelessness in the City, including
directing staff to explore the feasibility
of dedicated funding for housing for
homeless and precariously housed people,
including a bond measure, parcel tax, and
tax incentives.
DS has conducted a nexus study to update
fees for the Coastal Zone In‐Lieu Fee
Program which was presented before the
City Council for adoption on January 19,
2021 and adopted on July 13, 2021.
Staff reviews all available state and federal
funds for housing on an ongoing basis. In
FY17, the City was a joint applicant for two
applications for Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program
funding. One project was awarded $13.95
million in AHSC funds.
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance,
adopted in January 2021, includes in‐lieu
fees for developers that choose not to
include affordable units within a project
that falls under the requirements of the
ordinance.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-17
EAppendix
November 2021
Program Objective Timeframe Status
Homeownership Opportunity
City First-Time
Homebuyer
Assistance
Assist 25 lower income households with
homebuyer assistance.
Promote programs via City newsletters,
website, and brochures at public counters.
Pursue additional funding from State
housing programs; annually explore
funding opportunities with State HCD.
Promote program to City residents by
providing information on City website,
public counters, and other community
locations.
Ongoing
The LBCIC has provided 16 second
mortgage loans to very low‐ and low‐
income first‐ time homebuyers. This
program is currently discontinued.
Information on state and county programs
is promoted on the DS website, to
interested homebuyers, realtors, and
lenders.
Mitigation of Government Constraints
Development
Incentives
Continue to offer regulatory incentives
to accommodate the development of
accessible and affordable housing.
Monitor development trends to determine
the continued adequacy of incentives
in facilitating affordable housing and
augment incentives as necessary.
Promote incentives to interested
developers and provide technical
assistance through pre-application
meetings in the use of various incentives.
Ongoing
DS continues to offer a pre‐application
process whereby developers can gain
early‐input on potential development
projects and have any fees paid applied
to their future Site Plan Review fees.
This process provides early input to
developers at minimal cost. The City also
tracks development activity and assists
developers with both the planning and
building application and funding process.
The adoption of the Midtown Specific
Plan also incentivizes and streamlines TOD
development.
Fair and Equal Housing Opportunity
Fair Housing
Continue to participate in fair housing
programs and support fair housing
services and tenant/landlord counseling
services.
Promote programs via City newsletters,
website, and brochures at public counters.
Ongoing
DS has renewed its contract with the Long
Beach Fair Housing Foundation to provide
fair housing services and tenant/landlord
consulting services. In 2016, DS prepared
an updated Assessment of Fair Housing
(AFH), which was approved by HUD in
April 2017.
The 2021-2029 Housing Element
will incorporate the findings and
recommendations of the AFH.
Monitoring and Review
Annual Report Present annual progress report to the City Council and submit to HCD. Ongoing
DS continues to present the Annual
Progress Report to City Council and submit
it to HCD.
Table E-1: Review of Progress in Implementing the 2013-2021 Housing Element (continued) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-18
Appendix
E
November 2021
Table E-2: Accomplishments vs. Objectives
New Construction Rehabilitation Preservation Housing Assistance RHNA
(1/1/14-
10/1/21)
Constructed
(1/1/14-
12/31/19)
Objectives Rehabilitated Objectives Preserved Objectives Households Assisted
Extremely
Low
Income
(0-30%
MFI)
886
410
1,010
800 1,017
4,656
Very Low
Income
(31-50%
MFI)
887 1,060 4,308
Low
Income
(51-80%
MFI)
1,066 177 1,167 0 0 71
Moderate
Income
(81-120%
MFI)
1,170 39 0 0 0 0 0 0
Above
Moderate
Income
(>120%
MFI)
3,039 2,592 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes:
Housing rehabilitation includes:
Housing Rehabilitation
LBP Abatement
Housing assistance includes the following programs:
Housing Choice Vouchers
Family Self-Sufficiency
HOPWA Tenant-Based Rental Assistance
HOME Security Deposit Assistance
VASH
Project Based Vouchers
First-Time Homebuyers Programs
Appendix | Review of Past Accomplishments
E-19
EAppendix
November 2021
Cumulative Impacts on Addressing
Special Needs
The City of Long Beach had worked diligently over the past eight years to address the housing needs of special needs populations through a variety of actions:
» Preservation of at-risk housing: The City extended
affordability for a number of affordable housing projects that are targeted for special needs groups. These
include: New Hope Home (seniors); Sea Mist Tower
(senior veterans); Covenant Manor (seniors); Brethren
Manor (seniors); American Goldstar Manor (senior
veterans); Beachwood Apartments (disabled); Sara’s
Apartments (seniors and disabled); Federation Tower
(seniors and disabled).
» Continuum of Care: The Long Beach CoC continues to
provide 1,679 Emergency/Transitional program beds,
Permanent Supportive Housing with a capacity of 854
persons (beds), and Rapid Rehousing for 28 persons.
Overall, the City’s housing inventory for the homeless is 2,561 beds.
» Zoning revisions for special needs housing: The City
revised the Zoning Code to address the provision
of emergency shelters and single-room occupancy
housing,
» Housing assistance for special needs populations: These include Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) for
persons with HIV/AIDS and Veterans Affairs Supportive
Housing (VASH) vouchers for veterans.
» Expansion of affordable housing opportunities through new construction and acquisition/rehabilitation:
The City has supported the expansion of affordable
housing for special needs populations. For example,
the City is effective in its use of HOME CHDO funds
with partners including Home Ownership for Personal
Empowerment (HOPE). HOPE creates permanent
affordable housing for persons with developmental
disabilities by acquiring and rehabilitating single-family homes and small multi-family buildings to deliver safe
housing with onsite social services, while providing a new sense of self-sufficiency for this vulnerable population.
In partnership with the City, HOPE has acquired and
rehabilitated a total of 46 units. The rehabilitation of these units consists of upgrading accessibility features and other improvements to support the safety, comfort,
and independence of residents. The following is a list of projects developed by HOPE:
◊ 116 Redondo Ave - 7 units
◊ 6711 E 9th St - 4 units
◊ 4734 Sunfield Ave – 4 units
◊ 6127 E Keynote St – 4 units
◊ 817 Daisy Avenue – 7 units
◊ 4410-12 Banner – 7 units
◊ 2800 Baltic Ave – 3 units
◊ 1402 E. Washington – 3 units
◊ 4713 Clark Ave – 7 units
These projects are scattered citywide, with over 70% of the projects in highest and high resource areas, therefore addressing the first goal of the City’s Assessment of Fair Housing to preserve affordable housing in low-income
neighborhoods and expand affordable housing
citywide.
For the 6th cycle Housing Element update, the City will continue its efforts in addressing the housing needs of special needs group, with an emphasis on those with
extremely low incomes. The City will also expand its efforts on enhancing tenant protection services and programs.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
E-20
Appendix
E
November 2021
This page left intentionally blank
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-1
FAppendix
November 2021
Appendix F: Fair Housing
Assessment
A. Introduction and Overview of
AB 686
In 2017, Assembly Bill 686 (AB 686) introduced an obligation to affirmatively further fair housing (AFFH) into California state law. AB 686 defined “affirmatively further fair housing” to mean “taking meaningful actions, in addition to combat discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity” for persons of color, persons with disabilities, and other protected classes. The Bill added an assessment of fair housing to the Housing Element which includes the following components:
» A summary of fair housing issues and assessment of the jurisdiction’s fair housing enforcement and outreach
capacity;
» An analysis of segregation patterns and disparities in access to opportunities,
» An assessment of contributing factors; and
» An identification of fair housing goals and actions.
B. Assessment of Fair Housing Issues
1.Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach
The Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) provides fair housing services to southern Los Angeles County jurisdictions
including Long Beach. FHF provides services related
to discrimination complaint intake and investigation,
education and outreach, and general housing services.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
The mission of the Office of Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity (FHEO) is to eliminate housing discrimination, promote economic opportunity, and achieve diverse,
inclusive communities by leading the nation in the
enforcement, administration, development, and public
understanding of federal fair housing policies and laws.
FHEO offers the following programs:
» Fair Housing Initiatives Program (FHIP): The Fair
Housing Initiatives Program provides funding to public
and private organizations that develop programs that
are designed to prevent or eliminate discriminatory
housing practices.
» Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP): The Fair
Housing Assistance Program strengthens nationwide
fair housing efforts by helping individual State and
local governments administer laws of their own that are consistent with the Federal Fair Housing Act.
» Economic Opportunities (Section 3): The Section 3
program requires that recipients of certain HUD financial assistance, to the greatest extent possible, provide job training, employment, and contract opportunities for
low or very low income residents in connection with
projects and activities in their neighborhoods.
Fair Housing Act Enforcement Activity
HUD investigates complaints of housing discrimination
based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, or familial status. At no cost to the complainants, HUD will investigate the complaint and try to conciliate the matter with both parties. According to the City’s 2017 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), from January 1, 2010 to March 8, 2016, 135 fair housing complaints in Long Beach were filed with HUD. Overall, disability-related discrimination (51 allegations), familial status discrimination (37 allegations), and race discrimination (37 allegations) were the most
commonly reported issues.
Among the 135 complaints filed, 112 complaints have been closed, with 23 complaints still under investigation. The disposition of these 112 closed complaints was as follows:
» 60 complaints were determined to have no probable
cause
» 23 complaints withdrawn by the complainants or closed due to lack cooperation from the complainants
» 23 complaints reached were successfully bought to
conciliation or settlement
» 3 complaints dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
» 2 complaints received FHAP judicial dismissal
» 1 complaint received Fair Housing Assistance Program
(FHAP) judicial consent order
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-2
Appendix
F
November 2021
California Department of Fair Employment and
Housing
The mission of the Department of Fair Employment and
Housing (DFEH) is t
o protect Californians from employment,
housing and public accommodation discrimination, and
hate violence. To achieve this mission, DFEH keeps track of and in
vestigates complaints of housing discrimination, as
well as complaints in the areas of employment, housing, public ac
commodations and hate violence.
State Fair Housing Laws Enforcement Activities
According to the City’s 2017 AFH, between 2010 and 2015, 132 fair housing complaints in the City of Long Beach
have been filed with DFEH. Most of these complaints (50 complaints) involved disability, followed by national origin (39 c
omplaints) and familial care (16 complaints).
Fair Housing Foundation
Since 1969, the City of Long Beach has contracted with the Fair Housing Foundation to affirmatively further fair housing through a comprehensive fair housing program. The Fair Housing Foundation (FHF) was founded in Long Beach
in
1964 by a diverse group of residents who organized
against Proposition 14, a state ballot initiative seeking to nullify California’s fair housing laws. For 50 years, FHF has oper
ated a private, nonprofit, education agency dedicated
to promoting the enforcement of fair housing laws and
encouraging an atmosphere of open housing regardless of the protected classes of age, arbitrary, color, familial status, gender, gender identity, marital status, mental disability, na
tional origin, physical disability, race, religion, sexual orientation, or source of income. The mission of FHF is “Dedicated to eliminating discrimination in housing and promoting equal access to housing choices for everyone .” The services offered by FHF and provided for the City of L
ong Beach are described below.
Discrimination Complaint Intake and Investigation
Federal and State fair housing laws prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, negotiation, insurance, or financing of housing based on race, religion, sex, marital status, familial status, disability, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, source of income or other arbitrary reason. FHF provides fair housing services to tenants, home-seekers and housing providers, which include:
» Responding to discrimination inquiries and complaints - screening and counseling
» Documenting discrimination complaints - opening fair
housing cases
» Investigating discrimination complaints - extensive
testing
» Resolving discrimination complaints - conciliation,
mediation, administrative agency referrals, and litigation According to the 2017 AFH, from April 1, 2010 through
March 31, 2015, FHF received 849 complaints alleging
housing discrimination in Long Beach. Consistent with
recent statewide trends, the top three discrimination
biases are physical disability 389 (46 percent), followed by race 154 (18 percent), and familial status 95 (11 percent).
Persons of low and very low income accounted for 782
(92 percent) of discrimination complaints. Racially, Black residents reported for 345 (41 percent) of complaints,
White residents reported for 248 (29 percent), and Hispanic residents, within ten race categories, reported for 198 (23 percent) complaints.
Not every allegation of housing discrimination results
in a fair housing case. After thoroughly screening and counseling the 849 complaints, FHF opened 375 bona
fide fair housing cases. Consistent with recent statewide trends, the top three discrimination biases were physical disability (41 percent), race (22 percent), and familial status (14 percent). Racially, Black residents accounted for 166 complaints (44 percent), White residents made
100 complaints (27 percent), and Hispanic residents
reported 83 complaints (23 percent). Persons of low
and very low income accounted for 347 (93 percent) of
discrimination complaints. Issues concerning disability have also remained steadily the largest area of fair housing complaints annually and resulting at 41 percent of all
complaints over that time period.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-3
FAppendix
November 2021
FHF conducted 632 investigations on the 375 cases, utilizing 11 forms of investigations. Depending upon numerous
variables, including allegation and prior complaints, an individual case may only utilize one type of investigation or multiple types of investigations. Of all cases investigated, FHF found evidence of discrimination in 133 cases (36
percent).
Nearly 25 percent of the cases with evidence of
discrimination closed as successfully conciliated resulting from both the complainant and respondent agreeing
to a resolution; two percent of those were resolved with a monetary settlement recovered for the complainants
when the cases were filed in State and Federal Courts. Of the remaining cases, three percent were either referred to an attorney for litigation, to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), or the Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
General Housing (Tenants and Landlords) Services
FHF counsels tenants, landlords, and housing providers on their rights and responsibilities, which includes:
» Responding to general housing inquiries - screening
and counseling
» Documenting general housing inquiries - maintaining
data on every client, the problem and the resolution
» Resolving general housing inquiries - counsel, pursue habitability cases, provide unlawful detainer assistance, conduct mediations, and provide appropriate referrals
FHF provides a comprehensive, extensive and viable
education and outreach program. The purpose of this
program is to educate tenants, landlords, owners, Realtors, and property management companies on fair housing
laws; to promote media and consumer interest; and to
secure grass roots involvement within communities which includes:
» Increasing public awareness - participating in
community and school events, attending conventions,
providing staff and information at trainings, staffing
clinics, and media exposure
» Conduct training sessions for consumers - conducting
two-hour Tenant Workshops, staffing booths, and
conducting community presentations
» Conducting training sessions for housing providers -
conducting two-hour Landlord Workshops, four-hour
Certificate Management Trainings, and Realtor trainings FHF specifically targets outreach to the persons and
protected classes that are most likely to encounter housing discrimination. The types of activities conducted fall into the follow four basic categories:
» Increase Public Awareness: FHF has developed new,
dynamic, and more effective approaches for bringing
fair housing information to residents, including
brochures that focus on specific fair housing issues.
» Training Sessions to Consumers: FHF provides fair
housing training opportunities throughout the City.
Trainings to housing consumers include:
» Tenant Workshops: A two-hour training that
generally covers an overview of fair housing laws,
leases and notices, rules and regulations, a tenant’s
obligations, and guidelines and specific concerns
regarding families with children, occupancy
standards, and discrimination rules.
» Booths: Staff booths and provide fair housing
literature at every opportunity available. Typically,
fair housing booths are staffed at community centers,
fairs, festivals, youth centers, colleges, trade shows, and carnivals.
» Presentations: A scheduled synopsis of fair housing
services and statistics to staff and employees of the
City or community-based organizations.
» Services for Housing Providers: Trainings are
provided to landlords, managers, realtors, and other
housing providers:
– Landlord Workshops: A two-hour training that
covers an review of fair housing laws, rental process,
selection criteria, rental agreement, rules and
regulations, obligations, and guidelines regarding late fees, security deposit, rent increases, and termination.
The training also covers specific concerns regarding
families with children, occupancy standards, and
reasonable accommodations and modifications.
– Certificate Management Trainings: A four-hour
training that gears toward property owners,
managers, management companies, and real estate
professions. Agenda includes a review of federal and
state fair housing laws, general guidelines, housing
for families with children, people with disabilities,
advertising guidelines, sexual harassment, prohibited
practices, and hate crimes.
– Realtor Trainings: A four-hour training that includes a summary of fair housing laws, general guidelines,
policies and practices, equal treatment needs and
examples, and guidelines to showing properties.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-4
Appendix
F
Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative Findings
on Fair Housing Issues
On May 25, 2020, George Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man, was killed by four Minneapolis Police Officers. The incident was captured on video for the world to see. Across the
nation, including in Long Beach, people took to the
streets in public outcry to condemn the violence and
racial inequities that have systematically and historically impacted Black people. On June 9, 2020, the Long Beach
City Council engaged in an earnest conversation about
racism as a public health crisis, the need to restore public trust in City government, and how to reconcile a gap in the experiences of impacted and vulnerable people with
current City policies, especially the Black community. The City Council called upon City staff to prepare a report that would put the City Council in a position to enact culture and system change.
Followed by a formal resolution, on June 23, 2020, Long Beach City Council unanimously adopted a Framework
for Reconciliation which contains four key steps to ending systemic racism:
» Acknowledging the existence and long-standing
impacts of systemic racism in Long Beach and the
country;
» Listening to accounts and experiences of racial injustice, inequity, or harm to community members; and
» Convening stakeholders to analyze feedback from
the listening sessions and racial disparity data to
recommend initiatives that shape policy, budgetary,
charter, and programmatic reform;
» Catalyzing action that includes immediate, short-term, medium-term, and long-term recommendations for the
City Council’s consideration.
On August 11, 2020, the Racial Equity and Reconciliation Initiative Team delivered an Initial Report summarizing their findings after two month of community engagement.
City data on racially disparate data related to housing included the following findings:
» 25% of Black residents are homeowners, which is half
the White homeownership rate
» Black women have the highest rate of rent burden,
which is defined as paying more than 30% of their
income on rent
This data was contextualized by local knowledge
summarized after a rigorous community engagement
process, including thirteen listening sessions, four town halls, and a community survey, resulting in feedback from over 1,500 individuals.
The Community Survey found that housing discrimination
is the number one way survey respondents reported
having experienced racism in Long Beach. The number
one survey response for how the City can foster economic inclusion was to increase affordable housing and legal
protections for Black people and people of color. The
community expressed concern for Long Beach residents
who were facing eviction due to limited public policy that protects tenants. Many community members believed
newer housing developments are marketed towards a
higher socioeconomic class while receiving tax breaks
and subsidies that benefit developers but not low-income renters. This has resulted in gentrification and the
displacement of low-income residents who are more likely to be people of color.
Community members also raised the problem of
environmental racism and a history of inequitable
development in the City. Long Beach communities in
the northwestern and southwestern portions of the City
are burdened by a high concentration of pollutants,
exacerbating health conditions in neighborhoods
disproportionately populated by people of color.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-5
FAppendix
November 2021
2. Integration and Segregation
Race and Ethnicity
Ethnic and racial composition of an area is useful in
analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing
concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences, and mobility.
This is particularly important given the ways race and
racism have shaped housing, development patterns and
segregation in Long Beach. The City is home to a diverse array of racial and ethnic groups, including distinct
communities of Mexican, Central/South American, African American, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino, Korean, Samoan,
Vietnamese, Guamanian, Chamorro, Cambodian, Laotian,
and Hmong descent. Despite the City’s diversity, the
historic racial segregation of neighborhoods still persists today. The formerly redlined areas of the City, particularly in Central and West Long Beach, are still disproportionately represented by communities of color today.
Conversely, as in cities throughout Southern California, areas developed in the post-World War II area, resulted in a significant expansion of new residential areas in
the City (in the case of Long Beach achieved through
annexation of adjacent farmland), was influenced by
exclusionary practices, despite a Supreme Court ban on
deed restrictions banning the sale or rental of properties to non-whites in 1948. The development of lower-density, more suburban and predominantly white East Long Beach
neighborhoods during the post-World War II era occurred through these processes of annexation, restrictive zoning and exclusionary practices including the widespread use of racial covenants. Even as Long Beach was transformed by waves of immigration during the mid- to late-20th century, restrictive covenants, zoning laws and implicit racial bias in the homebuying process have perpetuated racial and
economic segregation to the present day.
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 72
percent of the Long Beach population belongs to a racial or ethnic minority group, a slight increase from 70.6
percent during the 2006-2010 ACS. According to the AFH, persons of Mexican, Guatemalan, and Salvadoran national origin appear to be concentrated in western and central parts of the City just south of the Pacific Coast Hwy, and in North Long Beach just above 48th Street. Residents who
are Limited English Proficient (LEP) may face additional challenges with becoming integrated throughout more
varied areas in the City. With limited English language abilities, they face potential barriers to employment and adequate housing, which may dictate where they may
choose or be able to settle and locate. Residents who
have the most limited abilities to read, speak, write or understand English, are concentrated in western parts of the City, primarily north of Downtown and Central Long
Beach, and to a lesser extent North Long Beach and the
Westside. Reflective of the City’s overall demographics, the majority of these individuals speak Spanish (15 percent), Khmer (two percent), and Tagalong (one percent). All LEP residents, regardless of language spoken at home, are
notably concentrate in these areas.
HUD tracks racial or ethnic dissimilarity trends for Long Beach and the Los Angeles County region. Dissimilarity
indices show the extent of distribution between two
groups, in this case racial/ethnic groups, across census tracts. The following shows how HUD views various levels of the index:
• <40: Low Segregation
• 40-54: Moderate Segregation
• >55: High Segregation
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-6
Appendix
F
The indices for Long Beach and Los Angeles County Region from 1990 to 2020 are shown in Table F-1. Dissimilarity between non-White and White communities in Long Beach
and throughout the Los Angeles County region has actually worsened since 1990. In Long Beach, dissimilarity between all non-White and White communities has also worsened.
Based on HUD’s definition of the various levels of the index, segregation between Asian or Pacific Islander/White Long Beach and Los Angeles County communities is moderate,
while segregation between non-White/White, Black/White, and Hispanic/White communities is high.
Ethnic and racial composition of a region is useful in
analyzing housing demand and any related fair housing
concerns, as it tends to demonstrate a relationship with other characteristics such as household size, locational preferences, and mobility. Figure F-1 compared racial
or ethnic minority concentrations in 2010 and 2018. In
a majority of the northern, central, and western tracts, racial/ethnic minorities account for over 81 percent of the population. The tracts on the eastern end of the City have lower concentrations of racial/ethnic minority populations, though the concentration has increased in several tracts since 2010.
Table F-1: Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index
1990 2000 2010 2020
Long Beach
Non-White/White 53.14 57.5 55.84 58.13
Black/White 56.98 58.56 57.39 59.93
Hispanic/White 55.15 61.04 59.28 60.54
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 52.37 53.19 50.08 53.81 Los Angeles County
Non-White/White 56.66 56.72 56.55 58.53
Black/White 73.04 67.4 64.99 68.24
Hispanic/White 60.88 63.03 63.35 64.33
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 46.13 48.19 47.62 51.59 Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-7
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-1: (A) Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentrations (2010) Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-8
Appendix
F
Figure F-1: (B) Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentrations (2018) Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021 Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-9
FAppendix
November 2021
Disability
According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 10.2
percent of Long Beach residents experience a disability, compared to 9.9 percent Countywide. Since the 2008-2012 ACS, the disabled population in Long Beach has increased slightly from 10 percent, but decreased throughout the
County (9.4 percent). As shown in Figure F-2 Census tracts with a high percentage of persons with disabilities are more concentrated in the south western section of the
City surrounding the Port of Long Beach. The percentage of persons with disabilities in this area has increased since 2010.
Familial Status
Familial status refers to the presence of children under the age of 18, regardless of whether the child is biologically related to the head of household, or the martial status of the head of households. Families with children may face housing discrimination by landlords who fear that children will cause property damage. Some landlords may have
cultural biases against children of the opposite sex sharing a bedroom. Differential treatments such as limiting the number of children in a complex or confining children to a specific location are considered fair housing concerns.
Approximately 31 percent of Long Beach households have
one or more child under the age of 18. The City’s share of households with children is lower than the County
(33 percent), and the neighboring cities of Carson (36.4 percent), Cerritos (32.6 percent), Compton (49.9 percent), and Lakewood (37.3 percent), but the same as Torrance (31 percent).
Single parent households are also protected by fair housing law. Approximately 7.4 percent of households in the City are single-parent households. Female-headed households
with children require special consideration and assistance because of their greater need for affordable housing and accessible day care, health care, and other supportive
services. Over 6 percent of households in Long Beach are single female-headed households with children. As shown in Figure F-3 and Figure F-4 the eastern side of the City has higher concentrations of children in married couple households, while the tracts in the southwestern section of the City have higher concentrations of children in female- headed households.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-10
Appendix
F
Figure F-2: (A) Concentration of Persons with Disabilities (2010-2014)
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-11
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-2: (B) Concentration of Persons with Disabilities (2015-2019) Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-12
Appendix
F
Figure F-3: Percent of Children in Married Couple Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-13
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-4: Percent of Children in Female-Headed Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-14
Appendix
F
Income
Identifying low- or moderate-income (LMI) geographies and individuals is important to overcome patterns of segregation.
HUD’s 2013-2017 CHAS data (Table F-2) shows that 51.6 percent of Long Beach and Los Angeles County Households earn 80 percent or less than the area median family income and are considered lower income. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, the median household income in Long Beach is $63,017, lower than $68,044 for the County.
Table F-2: Income Level Distribution
Income Category
Long Beach Los Angeles County
Households Percent Households Percent
<30% HAMFI 32,590 19.8% 641,055 19.5%
31-50% HAMFI 24,055 14.6% 482,070 14.6%
51-80% HAMFI 28,575 17.3% 578,285 17.5%
81-100% HAMFI 17,495 10.6% 312,595 9.5%
>100% HAMFI 62,285 37.7% 1,281,195 38.9%
Total 165,000 100.0% 3,295,200 100.0%
Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.
Figure F-5 shows the Lower and Moderate Income (LMI)
areas in the City by census tract. HUD defines a LMI area as a census tract or block group where over 51 percent of the population is LMI. Tracts with higher LMI populations are most concentrated in the central and northern sections of the City, where LMI households account for 75 to 100 percent of the total population.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-15
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-5: Concentration of LMI Households
Source: HCD Data Viewer, HUD LMI Database, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-16
Appendix
F
3. Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas
of Poverty
Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty
(R/ECAPs)
In an effort to identify racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs), HUD has identified census tracts with a majority non-White population (greater than 50 percent) with a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower. According to HUD’s 2020 R/ ECAP mapping tool based on the 2009-2013 ACS, there
are currently 13 R/ECAPs in Long Beach. These R/ECAPs
are shown in Figure F-6 below. These areas include tracts in the City’s Westside, South Wrigley, Sunrise and Central neighborhoods. R/ECAP areas are generally distributed
south of Wardlow Road and west of Redondo Avenue, but
are also located in northern Long Beach in the Carmelitos neighborhood (Census Tract 5716) and one other is located in Southeast Long Beach, partially in the City’s Southeast Area Specific Plan area. However, the R/ECAP located in the City’s southeast area is a wetland with no residential population.
Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Affluence (RCAAs)
While racially concentrated areas of poverty and segregation (R/ECAPs) have long been the focus of fair housing
policies, racially concentrated areas of affluence (RCAAs) must also be analyzed to ensure housing is integrated,
a key to fair housing choice. A HUD Policy Paper defines racially concentrated areas of affluence as affluent, White communities. According to this report, Whites are the most racially segregated group in the United States and “in the same way neighborhood disadvantage is associated with
concentrated poverty and high concentrations of people
of color, conversely, distinct advantages are associated with residence in affluent, White communities. ” Based on their research, HCD defines RCAAs as census tracts where 1) 80 percent or more of the population is white, and 2) the median household income is $125,000 or greater (slightly more than double the national median household income
in 2016).
Figure F-7 shows predominantly White populations by
census tract and Figure F-8 shows median income by
block group. The eastern, southern, and southwestern
areas of the City tend to have larger populations of White residents. Several of the block groups in the eastern side of the City also have median incomes exceeding $125,000.
White predominant areas in the center of the City also have higher median incomes compared to the surrounding
areas.
1Goetz, Edward G., Damiano, A., & Williams, R. A. (2019) Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence: A Preliminary Investigation. ’ Published by the Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research (21,1, 99-124).
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-17
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-6: Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Note- this map has been updated by the City to reflect the most recent RECAPs which were not available in HCD Data Viewer
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-18
Appendix
F
Figure F-7: White Predominant Areas
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2021.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-19
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-8: Median Income
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-20
Appendix
F
4. Access to Opportunities
HUD developed an index for assessing fair housing by
informing communities about disparities in access to
opportunity based on race/ethnicity and poverty status.
Table F-3 shows index scores for the following opportunity indicator indices (values range from 0 to 100):
» Low Poverty Index: The higher the score, the less
exposure to poverty in a neighborhood.
» School Proficiency Index: The higher the score, the
higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood.
» Labor Market Engagement Index: The higher the
score, the higher the labor force participation and
human capital in a neighborhood.
» Transit Trips Index: The higher the trips transit index, the more likely residents in that neighborhood utilize
public transit.
» Low Transportation Cost Index: The higher the
index, the lower the cost of transportation in that
neighborhood.
» Jobs Proximity Index: The higher the index value, the better access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood.
» Environmental Health Index: The higher the value, the better environmental quality of a neighborhood
In Long Beach, Hispanic residents were most likely to be impacted by poverty, low school proficiency, low labor
market participation, and fewer accessible employment
opportunities. White residents in Long Beach and
throughout the County were least likely to be exposed to poverty. White residents also had the greatest access to high quality school systems and the highest labor market participation rates in both the City and County.
Long Beach residents, regardless of race or ethnicity, had better access to transit and lower transportation costs than residents Countywide. Long Beach has significantly lower environmental health indices for all racial/ethnic groups and income levels than the County.
In the City, those Long Beach foreign-born residents
originating from Mexico, the Philippines, or Cambodia
typically reside in areas with the lowest school proficiency index scores. They are also located in areas in the City that reflect the lowest job proximity index scores and therefore the least access to employment, and also generally reside in areas with low index scores for labor force engagement.
According to the AFH those of Mexican, Cambodian, and
Guatemalan national origin reside in areas that have high scores for transit trips and also for low transportation cost.
The majority of the foreign-born population found in the City of Long Beach, regardless of national origin, is located in the City’s areas with the lowest poverty index scores (highest areas of poverty). Notable also is a correlation between high concentrations of minority residents and
high levels of poverty in the City.
Access to proficient schools is particularly important to a community with high proportions of families with
children. In Long Beach, families with children may be
facing additional hardships in obtaining quality education.
According to the AFH, 60 to 100 percent of households
in areas that generally received low scores in the school proficiency index (less than 50 index points) are families with children. The highest performing schools in Long
Beach are located in parts of the City with the fewest
children.
When comparing household access to employment centers
and engagement in the labor force based on familial status, large proportions of households with children reside in areas with the lowest index scores.
Census tracts with a high percentage of families with
children are also areas that receive high index scores for transit trips and high index scores for low transportation cost. This could reflect a trend that family households with children prioritize access to public transportation when locating in the City.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-21
FAppendix
November 2021
Table F-3: HUD Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity Low
Poverty
School
Proficiency
Labor
Market Transit
Low
Transportation
Cost
Jobs
Proximity
Environmental
Health
Long Beach Total Population
White,
Non-Hispanic 64.67 65.78 66.41 89.24 79.21 37.61 0.94
Black,
Non-Hispanic 32.09 41.60 32.99 92.02 83.39 36.91 1.31
Hispanic 30.69 41.23 31.19 92.01 82.72 35.55 1.05
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic
40.91 46.69 37.55 90.45 80.45 37.35 1.21
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 41.89 48.67 45.33 91.58 82.65 37.67 0.98
Long Beach Population below federal poverty line
White,
Non-Hispanic 51.18 54.65 56.68 91.19 83.09 38.75 0.74
Black,
Non-Hispanic 21.70 38.71 24.12 93.51 85.58 37.11 1.12
Hispanic 19.45 35.82 23.30 93.61 85.16 37.24 0.70
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic
29.08 42.78 31.64 92.42 83.67 31.44 0.71
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 23.43 38.32 25.28 92.62 84.98 34.08 1.13
Los Angeles County Total Population
White,
Non-Hispanic 62.59 65.09 65.41 82.63 74.09 55.80 18.99
Black,
Non-Hispanic 34.95 32.37 34.00 87.70 79.18 40.13 11.66
Hispanic 33.91 38.38 33.18 87.19 77.74 41.53 11.91
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic
53.57 59.34 55.94 86.52 76.45 51.82 12.16
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 45.04 46.90 44.50 83.17 75.65 44.24 16.74
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-22
Appendix
F
Low
Poverty
School
Proficiency
Labor
Market Transit
Low
Transportation
Cost
Jobs
Proximity
Environmental
Health
Population below federal poverty line
White,
Non-Hispanic 50.68 57.49 58.06 86.42 79.48 57.52 16.66
Black,
Non-Hispanic 23.45 25.52 27.16 88.65 81.18 36.59 11.62
Hispanic 23.66 27.66 32.87 89.45 81.02 42.84 10.30
Asian
or Pacific Islander,
Non-Hispanic
42.97 50.06 54.52 89.62 81.49 54.19 9.84
Native American,
Non-Hispanic 29.85 32.02 35.12 85.23 78.70 46.35 16.01
Source: HUD AFFH Database, 2020.
To assist in this analysis, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) convened in the California Fair Housing Task Force (Task Force) to “provide research, evidence-based policy recommendations, and other strategic recommendations to HCD and other related state agencies/ departments to further the fair housing goals (as defined by HCD). ” The Task force has created Opportunity Maps to identify resources levels across the state “to accompany new policies aimed at increasing access to high opportunity areas for families with children in housing financed with 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTCs)” . These opportunity maps are made from composite scores of three different domains made up of a set of indicators. Based on these domain scores, tracts are categorized as Highest Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing), Low Resource, or areas of High Segregation and Poverty. Table F-4 shows the full list of indicators.
Table F-4: Domains and List of Indicators for Opportunity Maps Domain Indicator
Environmental CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pollution Indicators and values Economic
Poverty
Adult education
Employment
Job proximity
Median home value
Education
Math proficiency
Reading proficiency
High School graduation rates
Student poverty rates
Poverty and Racial Segregation
Poverty: tracts with at least 30% of population under federal poverty line Racial Segregation: Tracts with location quotient higher than 1.25 for Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or all people of color in comparison to the County Source: CA Fair Housing Task Force, Methodology for TCAC/HCD Opportunity Maps, December 2020.
Table F-3: HUD Opportunity Indicators by Race/Ethnicity (continued) Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-23
FAppendix
November 2021
Opportunity map scores for Long Beach census tracts are presented in Figure F-9. Approximately 20.9 percent of
tracts in the City are characterized as Highest Resource,
15.5 as High Resource, 22.7 as Moderate Resource, 2.7
percent as Moderate Resource (Rapidly Changing), 16.4
percent as Low Resource, and 14.5 percent as areas of High Segregation and Poverty. The remaining 7.3 percent were not calculated. A majority of the tracts in the eastern section of the City are highest resource areas. The western section of the City is made up of moderate and low resource areas and areas of high segregation and poverty.
Economic
As described previously, the Fair Housing Task Force
calculates economic scores based on poverty, adult
education, employment, job proximity, and median home
values. According to the 2021 Task Force maps presented in Figure F-10, tracts with the lowest economic scores
are most concentrated in the southwestern and northern
sections of the City. There are a few tracts with low
economic scores scattered throughout the eastern side of Long Beach, however generally the eastern section of the City has higher economic scores.
Education
As described above, the Fair Housing Task Force determines education scores based on math and reading proficiency, high school graduation rates, and student poverty rates.
Areas with lower education scores, shown in Figure F-11, are generally concentrated in the southwestern section of the City near the Port of Long Beach. The tracts with the lowest education scores in the eastern section of the City also have the lowest economic scores (see Figure F-10).
Generally, the eastern side of the City has higher education scores compared to the rest of Long Beach.
Environmental
Environmental health scores are determined by the Fair
Housing Task Force based on CalEnviroScreen 3.0 pollution indicators and values. Figure F-12 shows that the south- western section of the City has the highest concentration of tracts with the lowest environmental score. A few tracts along the northern and eastern City border also have the lowest environmental scores.
Transportation
Availability of efficient, affordable transportation can be used to measure fair housing and access to opportunities.
SCAG developed a mapping tool for High Quality Transit
Areas (HQTA) as part of the Connect SoCal 2020-2045
Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities
Strategy (RTP/SCS). SCAG defines HQTAs as areas within
one-half mile from a major transit stop and a high-quality transit corridor. Figure F-13 shows that most of Long
Beach, with some gaps in coverage on the east side, North Long Beach and Southeast Long Beach is considered an
HQTA. As discussed previously, Long Beach also scored
higher than the County average in access to transit and low transportation cost (see Table F-3).
HUD’s Job Proximity Index, described previously, can be used to show transportation need geographically. Block
groups with lower jobs proximity indices are located
further from employment opportunities and have a higher need for transportation. As shown in Figure F-14, census block groups surrounding the Port and Airport have the
greatest access to employment opportunities, while the
eastern and northern sections of the City have least access to employment opportunities.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-24
Appendix
F
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.
Figure F-9: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Composite Score
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-25
FAppendix
November 2021
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.
Figure F-10: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Economic Score
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-26
Appendix
F
Figure F-11: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Education Score
Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-27
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-12: TCAC Opportunity Areas - Environmental Score Source: HCD Data Viewer, TCAC Opportunity Maps, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-28
Appendix
F
Figure F-13: High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs) - 2045
Source: SCAG HQTA Database, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), 2021.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-29
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-14: HUD Jobs Proximity Index Score by Block Group Source: HCD Data Viewer, HUD Opportunity Indicators, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-30
Appendix
F
5. Disproportionate Housing Needs
Housing problems for Long Beach were calculated using
HUD’s 2020 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data based on the 2013-2017 ACS. Table F-5 breaks down households by race and ethnicity and presence of
housing problems for Long Beach and Los Angeles County
households. The following conditions are considered
housing problems:
» Substandard Housing (incomplete plumbing or kitchen
facilities)
» Overcrowding (more than 1 person per room)
» Cost burden (housing costs greater than 30%)
In Long Beach, 36.5 percent of owner-occupied households and 58.6 percent of renter-occupied households have
one or more housing problem. The City had a slightly
lower proportion of households with a housing problem
compared to the County, where 39.9 percent of owner-
occupied households and 62.3 percent of renter-occupied households experience a housing problem. In Long
Beach, Hispanic renters experience housing problems at
the highest rate (67.4 percent), while White owners had the fewest instances of housing problems (29.2 percent).
Black, Asian, American Indian, Pacific Islander, and Hispanic households all have housing problems above the City
average for both owner and renter households.
Table F-5: Housing Problems by Race/Ethnicity
With Housing Problem White Black Asian Am. Ind Pac. Isldr. Hispanic Other All Long Beach Total Population
Owner-Occupied 29.2% 45.5% 42.4% 49.5% 42.7% 46.0% 37.7% 36.5% Renter-Occupied 48.9% 59.3% 55.3% 59.3% 55.2% 67.4% 48.9% 58.6% Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 32.1% 41.5% 38.3% 39.7% 39.7% 48.2% 36.5% 38.9% Renter-Occupied 52.6% 63.7% 56.3% 56.4% 55.5% 71.1% 55.7% 62.3% Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.
Cost Burden
Cost burden by tenure based on HUD CHAS data is shown
in Table F-6. American Indian and Black non-Hispanic
renter-households have the highest rate of cost burden.
Cost burden amongst owner-households, regardless of
race or ethnicity, is lower than renter-households. White, non-Hispanic owner-occupied households have the lowest
instance of cost burden Citywide.
Figure F-15 compares overpayment by tenure over time
using the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 ACS. Overpayment for
homeowners has has generally remained constant, though
it has decreased in several tracts in the south central and eastern section of the City. Overpayment by renters has also increased in some tracts Citywide, but also has generally remained the same since the 2010-2014 ACS. There are
no areas of the City where overpayment has significantly decreased.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-31
FAppendix
November 2021
Table F-6: Cost Burden by Race/Ethnicity
Cost Burden (>30%) Severe Cost Burden (>50%) Total HHs
Owner-Occupied
White, non-Hispanic 28.3% 12.3% 34,955
Black, non-Hispanic 42.6% 17.3% 5,995
Asian, non-Hispanic 33.9% 11.7% 8,025
Amer. Ind, non-Hispanic 52.3% 25.0% 220
Pacific Isldr., non-Hispanic 29.5% 15.9% 220
Hispanic 35.8% 16.2% 15,295
Other 37.0% 11.3% 1,285
Renter-Occupied
White, non-Hispanic 45.7% 25.5% 29,140
Black, non-Hispanic 55.1% 31.2% 16,890
Asian, non-Hispanic 44.4% 23.0% 11,305
Amer. Ind, non-Hispanic 55.8% 19.8% 430
Pacific Isldr., non-Hispanic 43.6% 14.5% 860
Hispanic 54.5% 28.0% 37,640
Other 42.5% 21.5% 2,740
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-32
Appendix
F
Figure B-15: (A) Overpayment by Owners (2010-2014)
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-33
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure B-15: (B) Overpayment by Owners (2015-2019)
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-34
Appendix
F
Figure F-15: (C) Overpayment by Renters (2010-2014)
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-35
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-15: (D) Overpayment by Renters (2015-2019)
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2010-2014 & 2015-2019 ACS, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-36
Appendix
F
Overcrowding
Table F-7, below, shows that approximately 6.2 percent of owner-occupied households and 16.8 percent of renter-
occupied households in Long Beach are overcrowded. The
proportion of overcrowded households is slightly higher than but similar to the County, where 5.7 percent of owner- occupied households and 16.7 percent of renter-occupied households are overcrowded.
Table F-7: Overcrowding by Tenure
Overcrowded
(>1 person per room)
Severely Overcrowded
(<1.5 persons per room) Total HHs
Households % Households %
Long Beach
Owner-Occupied 4,080 6.2% 1,190 1.8% 66,000
Renter-Occupied 16,640 16.8% 7,775 7.9% 99,000
Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 85870 5.7% 23025 1.5% 1,512,365
Renter-Occupied 298460 16.7% 134745 7.6% 1,782,835
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.
Figure F-16 and Figure F-17 show the concentration
of overcrowded and severely overcrowded households
by census tract. Overcrowded households are most
concentrated in tracts located in the central and
northern sections of the City. Similarly, tracts with higher concentrations of severely overcrowded households are
also located in the central areas of the City.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-37
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-16: Concentration of Overcrowded Households
Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2020 HUD CHAS Data, 2021.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-38
Appendix
F
Figure F-17: Concentration of Severely Overcrowded Households Source: HCD Data Viewer, 2020 HUD CHAS Data, 2021.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-39
FAppendix
November 2021
Substandard Housing
Incomplete plumbing or kitchen facilities can be used to measure substandard housing conditions. In Long Beach,
0.3 percent of owner-occupied households and 2.2 percent of renter-occupied households lacked complete plumbing
or kitchen facilities, fewer compared to the County
(Table F-8).
Housing age can also be used as an indicator for substandard housing and rehabilitation needs. Homes may begin to
require major repairs or rehabilitation at 30 to 40 years of age. According to the 2015-2019 ACS, approximately 82.3 percent of the housing stock in Long Beach was built prior to 1980 and may be susceptible to deterioration, compared to 74.3 percent Countywide.
Based on data collected by the City’s Code Enforcement
Bureau, only 8 properties that have been inspected since the beginning of 2020 were deemed substandard and in
need of actual replacement, a rate of 0.001%.
Table F-8: Substandard Housing Conditions
Lacking Complete Plumbing or Kitchen Facilities
Total HHs
Households %
Long Beach
Owner-Occupied 204 0.3% 66,000
Renter-Occupied 2,145 2.2% 99,000
Los Angeles County
Owner-Occupied 6,850 0.5% 1,512,365
Renter-Occupied 50,030 2.8% 1,782,835
Source: HUD CHAS Data (2013-2017 ACS), 2020.
Displacement Risk
HCD defines sensitive communities as “communities [that] currently have populations vulnerable to displacement
in the event of increased development or drastic shifts in housing cost. ” The following characteristics define a vulnerable community:
» The share of very low income residents is above 20%;
and
» The tract meets two of the following criteria:
– Share of renters is above 40%,
– Share of people of color is above 50%,
– Share of very low-income households (50% AMI or
below) that are severely rent burdened households is
above the county median,
– They or areas in close proximity have been
experiencing displacement pressures (percent
change in rent above County median for rent
increases), or
– Difference between tract median rent and median
rent for surrounding tracts above median for all tracts in county (rent gap).
HCD has identified vulnerable communities in the northern and central sections of the City ( Figure A-18). These areas also have higher concentrations of racial/ethnic minorities, LMI households, overpaying households, and overcrowded
households.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-40
Appendix
F
Source: HCD Data Viewer, Urban Displacement Project, 2021.
Figure F-18: Sensitive Communities At-Risk of Displacement
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-41
FAppendix
November 2021
6. Summary of Fair Housing Issues
C. Sites Inventory
AB 686 requires the sites identified to meet the RHNA to be consistent with its duty to affirmatively further fair housing and the findings in this fair housing assessment. Figure F-19 shows the City’s Sites Inventory and R/ECAPs located within the City boundaries. The sites identified to meet the RHNA are generally dispersed throughout the City.
Figure F-20 shows the compares the acreage of R/ECAPs
in the City and the acreage of sites used to meet the City’s RHNA with respect to R/ECAPs. Approximately 8 percent
of the City is considered a R/ECAP , while 14 percent of the acreage identified to meet the RHNA are located in
R/ECAPs. This is in part because most of the R/ECAPs are also located along the City’s major transportation corridors where higher- intensity transit-oriented development
would be appropriate and is facilitated by the City’s land use regulations, consistent with state law for reducing carbon emissions, SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategies.
Table F-9 shows the distribution of RHNA units by income category, both within and outside R/ECAPs. Most units
allocated to meet the City’s RHNA are in tracts that are not considered a R/ECAP; only 11.6 percent of units are located within R/ECAPs. There are fewer lower income units located in R/ECAPs (8.6 percent), compared to moderate
income units (23.5 percent) and above moderate income
units (13.2 percent). The City’s RHNA strategy does not disproportionately locate new lower income units in
existing areas of racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs).
Figure F-20: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by R/ECAPs area in r/ecaparea in r/ecap area not in r/ecap
site inventory % of totalcity % of total
area not in r/ecap
15%
9%
85%91%
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-42
Appendix
F
Figure F-19: Sites Inventory and R/ECAPs
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-43
FAppendix
November 2021
Table F-9: Distribution of RHNA Units by R/ECAP Tract
R/ECAP (Tract) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income Units Above Moderate- Income Units
All RHNA
Units
R/ECAP 8.6% 23.5% 13.2% 11.6%
Not a R/ECAP 91.4% 76.5% 86.8% 88.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
(RTP/SCS), and planning best practices. Introducing new development in these areas in conjunction with expanded tenant protections would infuse private investments in
these neighborhoods and have the potential to facilitate neighborhood improvements while minimizing the risk of
displacing existing residents.
Figure F-21 shows the Sites Inventory by TCAC Opportunity Area. As described above, a majority of the eastern side of the City is highest or high resource, while the western section of the City is a mix of moderate and low resource areas and areas of high segregation and poverty. Most of the sites identified are located on the western side of the City.
Figure F-22 shows the breakdown of sites by TCAC
Opportunity Area. Highest and high resource areas make
up approximately 26 percent and 16 percent of the
City’s geography. However, only 12 percent of the sites identified are in highest resource areas and 13 percent are in high resource areas. Conversely, 32 percent of sites are located in moderate resource or moderate resource
(rapidly changing) tracts, while these tracts make up only 16 percent of the City’s geography. Low resource areas
account for 11 percent of the City, but 22 percent of the sites inventory. Approximately 6 percent of the City’s
geography is classified as an area of high segregation and poverty, but 14 percent of the sites inventory is located within these tracts.
Table F-10 shows the breakdown of site inventory units
by income category and TCAC Opportunity Area score. A
larger proportion of lower income units (61.8 percent) are in highest, high, or moderate resource, including rapidly changing, tracts compared to moderate income units (49.6 percent) and above moderate income units (36 percent).
Further, 19.1 percent of lower income units are in high or highest resource tracts compared to 18.2 percent of
moderate income units and only 9.5 percent of above
moderate income units. Overall, 29 percent of units are in low resource tracts, including 21.6 percent of lower income units, and 16.8 percent are in tracts of high segregation and poverty, including 16.6 percent of lower income units.
Though a substantial proportion of lower income units are in low resource and high segregation and poverty tracts, the City’s RHNA strategy generally locates units throughout the City, and does not disproportionally put lower income units in low resource areas in comparison to moderate and above moderate income units. Thus, the site inventory helps address patterns of segregation by focusing more
low-income units in higher resource areas, and more
market rate units in lower resource areas.
It is also important that many of the sites in the inventory are designed to facilitate housing affordable to various income levels, either through the provision of very-low and low-income units as required by inclusionary housing ordinance in the Downtown and Midtown areas of the City, or through the Enhanced Density Bonus incentives that
go above and beyond state law to facilitate mixed-income projects that include low or moderate-income units
citywide. The incentives are for EDB are generous across the board, but are most generous for moderate-income
units. These two strategies are critical to facilitating mixed- income housing, including in high-opportunity areas,
as has been successful in Los Angele’s Transit Oriented Communities program, which the Enhanced Density Bonus
is modeled from. Program 6.7 calls for monitoring and
potentially expand the inclusionary housing requirements to other submarkets, and Program 6.10: Zoning Tailored to Disadvantaged Neighborhoods, to maximize benefits of
new development for lower-income communities of color
while employing strategies to minimize displacement.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-44
Appendix
F
Figure F-21: Sites Inventory and TCAC Opportunity Areas
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-45
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-22: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by TCAC Opportunity Score
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-46
Appendix
F
As discussed previously, the eastern section of the City tends to have higher environmental quality compared
to the western section of the City. Figure F-23 shows the Sites Inventory and CalEnviroScreen score by census tract.
Most of the sites are located in the western and southern sections of the City.
Figure F-24 shows the breakdown of the Sites Inventory
area by CalEnviroScreen score. The sites identified to
fulfill the City’s RHNA are disproportionately located in higher risk areas. Approximately 39 percent of the City has a CalEnviroScreen score of 6 or above, and is a higher environmental risk area. However, 72 percent of the area identified in the Sites Inventory is located within tracts that scored a 6 or above. Only 23 percent of the Sites Inventory area is located in a tract that scored a 5 or below.
Table F-10: Sites Inventory Unit Breakdown by TCAC Opportunity Score TCAC Opportunity Area Score
(Tract)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-Income
Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA
Units
Highest Resource 5.6% 7.8% 4.2% 5.0%
High Resource 13.5% 10.4% 5.2% 9.2%
Moderate Resource 41.6% 29.4% 29.4% 34.9%
Moderate Resource (Rapidly
Changing) 1.1% 2.0% 0.9% 1.1%
Low Resource 21.6% 16.9% 37.1% 29.0%
High Segregation and Poverty 16.6% 17.9% 16.8% 16.8%
Missing/Insufficient Data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
The February 2021 update to the CalEnviroScreen
(CalEnviroScreen 4.0) and the distribution of the City’s sites inventory by unit is shown in Table F -11. A census tract’s overall CalEnviroScreen percentile equals the
percentage of all ordered CalEnviroScreen scores that fall below the score for that area. Most units are in tracts with poor EnviroScreenScores in the 81st percentile or above, including 64.1 percent of lower income units, 45.6 percent of moderate income units, and 71.9 percent of above
moderate income units. A smaller percentage of lower
income units fall into the 40th percentile or below (4.8 percent), compared to 27.2 percent of moderate income
units and 11.8 percent of above moderate income units.
However, 31.1 percent of lower income units fall into the mid-range scores between the 40th and 80th percentile,
while only 27.2 percent of moderate income units and
16.2 percent of above moderate income units fall into this range.
As shown, lower-income units are not more strongly
focused in high CalEnviroScreen areas compared to
other income levels. Although a larger proportion of site inventory units are in high CalEnviroScreen scoring areas than the City’s overall breakdown of scores, this also
reflects that areas well served by transit and jobs, such as the Downtown area, are in high CalEnviroScreen areas as West, Central and North Long Beach are impacted by the
Port and goods movement corridors.
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-47
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-23: Sites Inventory and CalEnviroScreen Score
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-48
Appendix
F
Figure F-24: Distribution of City and Sites Inventory Area by CalEnviroScreen Score
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-49
FAppendix
November 2021
Table F-11: Distribution of RHNA Units by CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile Score CalEnviroScreen Percentile
Score (Tract) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income
Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units All RHNA Units
<20% 2.1% 18.4% 8.3% 6.0%
21-40% 2.7% 8.8% 3.5% 3.4%
41-60% 12.5% 8.0% 3.9% 8.0%
61-80% 18.5% 19.3% 12.4% 15.5%
>81% 64.1% 45.6% 71.4% 67.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Table F-12 shows a majority (65.5%) of lower income RHNA units are located in tracts where racial/ethnic minorities make up more than 80% of the population. A majority of moderate income units (59.7%) are also located in tracts with racial ethnic minority populations greater than 80%, while only 48.6% of above moderate income units are in tracts with a racial/ ethnic minority population exceeding 80%. There are very few RHNA sites, affordable or market-rate, in tracts where racial/ ethnic minority concentrations are between 0 and 40%; however, as shown in Figure F-25, most tracts in the City have high racial/ethnic minority concentrations. Long Beach as a whole is a city with a majority people of color, however a majority of the sites identified to meet the RHNA are located in areas of the City with the greatest concentrations of people of color.
Table F-12: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Racial/Ethnic Minority Population Racial/Ethnic Minority
Population (Census Tracts) Lower Income Units Moderate-Income Units
Above Moderate-
Income Units All RHNA Units
<=20% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%
20.1-40% 4.0% 5.9% 3.5% 3.8%
40.1-60% 8.6% 8.9% 17.3% 12.9%
60.1-80% 21.9% 9.8% 24.3% 22.5%
>80% 65.5% 59.7% 48.6% 56.8%
No data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 39%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-50
Appendix
F
As shown in Table F-13, there are no sites used to meet the City’s RHNA in tracts where disabled populations exceed 30%.
Approximately 41% of lower income RHNA units, 40% of moderate income units, and 36% of above moderate income units are in tracts with a disabled population below 10%. Only 3.1% of all RHNA units are in tracts where the disabled persons make up between 20 and 30% of the population, none of which are lower income units. Figure F-26 shows the Sites Inventory and the concentration of persons with disabilities. The southwestern section of the City has the highest concentration of persons with disabilities, however none of the sites identified to meet the RHNA are located within these tracts.
Table F-13: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Disabled Population Disabled Population (Census Tracts) Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<10% 41.3% 40.0% 36.0% 38.6%
10-20% 58.0% 44.1% 52.2% 54.4%
20-30% 0.7% 0.3% 5.5% 3.1%
No Data 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Of the total units used to meet the RHNA, regardless of income category, 30% are in tracts where 20-40% of children are in married couple households, 31.6% where 40-60% of children are in married couple households, and 30.4% where 60-80% of children are in married couple households ( Table F-14). Approximately 41% of moderate income RHNA units are in tracts where only 20-40% of children live in married couple households, compared to 24.1% of moderate income units and
22.4% of lower income units.
Table F-14: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Children in Married Couple Households Children in Married Couple Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<20% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
20-40% 22.4% 24.1% 40.8% 31.6%
40-60% 41.8% 37.1% 19.3% 31.4%
60-80% 32.2% 18.0% 30.5% 30.6%
>80% 3.6% 5.2% 3.0% 3.4%
No Data available 0.0% 15.6% 6.4% 3.9%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-51
FAppendix
November 2021
As presented in Table F-15 1.2% of moderate income units and 0.5% of above moderate income units are in tracts where between 60 and 80% of children live in single-parent female-headed households. Nearly half of lower income RHNA units are in tracts where 20 to 40% of children live in female-headed households and another 31.1% are in tracts where fewer than 20% of children live in female-headed households. The Sites Inventory and concentration of children by household type are shown in Figure F-27 and Figure F-28.
Table F-15: Sites Inventory Breakdown by Children in Female-Headed Households Children in Female-Headed Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<20% 31.1% 19.2% 27.4% 26.2%
20-40% 16.9% 46.1% 31.7% 36.8%
40-60% 22.0% 18.8% 33.8% 27.1%
60-80% 0.0% 1.2% 0.5% 0.3%
>80% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
No Data available 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
As shown in Table F-16, there are more RHNA units, affordable and market-rate, located in tracts with higher concentrations of LMI households exceeding 50%. Approximately 45% of lower income units, 44% of moderate income units, and 42% of above moderate income units are in tracts with an LMI population over 75%. A smaller share of lower income units (2.1%) are in tracts where LMI households make up less than 25% of the population, compared to moderate income units (18.9%) and above moderate income units (8.9%). As discussed previously, there are higher concentrations of LMI households on the western side of the City. Figure F-29 shows that most of the sites selected to meet the RHNA are also located along the western and southern sections of the City in tracts with higher percentages of LMI households.
Table F-16: Sites Inventory Breakdown by LMI Households LMI Households
(Census Tracts)
Lower Income
Units
Moderate-
Income Units
Above
Moderate-
Income Units
All RHNA Units
<25% 2.1% 18.9% 8.9% 6.3%
25.1-50% 18.1% 9.4% 22.6% 19.9%
50.1-75% 34.9% 28.1% 26.9% 30.6%
75.1-100% 44.9% 43.6% 41.5% 43.2%
Total 12,943 1,446 14,182 28,571
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-52
Appendix
F
Figure F-25: Sites Inventory and Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentration
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-53
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-26: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Persons with Disabilities
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-54
Appendix
F
Figure F-27: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Children in Married Couple Households
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-55
FAppendix
November 2021
Figure F-28: Sites Inventory and Concentration of Children in Female-Headed Households
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-56
Appendix
F
Figure F-29: Sites Inventory and Concentration of LMI Households
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-57
FAppendix
November 2021
D. Identification and Prioritization of
Contributing Factors
Through its 2017 AFH, the City prioritized 22 contributing factors to fair housing issues. Since that time, the City has continued to have community conversations, data
gathering and analysis on fair housing issues including through development of an Office of Equity, an Equitable Growth Profile, through public conversations with the City Council on housing issues including through the Mayor’s Taskforce on Workforce and Affordable Housing, the
Everyone Home Plan, and development of the inclusionary housing policy. Subsequently, as described above, the in the wake of the killing of George Floyd and the 2020 civil uprising, the City developed a Framework for Reconciliation in partnership with the community to begin addressing
structural and systemic racism.
Major themes and concerns related to housing included:
» The disproportionate impact of housing cost burden on black residents and people of color
» Concerns with the racial gaps in homeownership
» Housing is not available for residents of color in higher opportunity areas of the City
» Housing discrimination against black people and
communities of color
» Eviction rates and lack of sufficient tenant protections » Not enough affordable housing is available
» Disproportionate rates of gentrification and the
displacement of low-income residents who are more
likely to be people of color.
» Environmental racism and a history of inequitable
development in the City
Based on available data, including data in appendices B and F, as well as the above-summarized feedback from
community over the past several years, the following
contributing factors have been prioritized with programs and efforts as outlined in the Housing Plan.
» Contributing Factor: Displacement of residents due to economic pressures
– Program 5.2: Tenant Protection
– Program 6.4: Replacement Housing Requirements
– Program 6.5: Tenant Rights to Counsel
» Contributing Factor: Location and type of affordable
housing
– Program 1.1: Adequate Sites for RHNA (Enhanced
Density Bonus)
– Program 1.5: Religious Facility Housing Overlay
– Program 6.7: Inclusionary Housing
» Contributing Factor: Land use and zoning laws
– Program 2.1: Adaptive Reuse
– Program 2.3: Zoning Code Amendments
– Program 2.4: A Variety of Housing Types
– Program 6.2: Visitability Ordinance
» Contributing Factor: Lack of private investments in
specific neighborhoods
– Program 6.8: Community Land Trust
– Program 6.10: Zoning Tailored to Disadvantaged
Neighborhoods
» Contributing Factor: Lack of public investments in
specific neighborhoods
– Program 6.11: Consolidated Plan Update
– Program 6.12: Housing Rehabilitation
– Program 6.13: Neighborhood Resources
– Program 6.14: Neighborhood Leadership
Development
» Contributing Factor: Private discrimination/source of income discrimination
– Program 6.1: Fair Housing Outreach and Enforcement
– Program 6.3: Voucher Mobility
» Contributing Factor :Deteriorated properties
– Program 5.3: Home Rehabilitation
– Program 5.4: Comprehensive Code Enforcement
» Contributing Factor: Location of environmental health hazards
– Program 6.6: Unpermitted Dwelling Unit Amnesty
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-58
Appendix
F
Table F-14: Contributing Factors to Fair Housing Issues Prioritized for Actions Potential Contributing Factors
Fair Housing Issues
1. Segregation/Integration
2. R/ECAPs
3. Disparities in Access to
Opportunity
4. Disproportionate Housing
Needs
5. Publicly Supported Housing
Location and Occupancy
6. Disability and Access Issues
7. Fair Housing Enforcement,
Outreach Capacity, and Resources
Access to Decent, Affordable, and Adequate Housing
Availability of affordable units in range of unit sizes √ Displacement of residents due to economic pressures √ √ √ √ Lack of affordable, integrated housing with supportive
services √
Lack of assistance for transitioning from institutional settings to integrated housing √
Location and type of affordable housing √ √ √
Lack of affordable, accessible housing in range of unit sizes √ Location of affordable, accessible housing √
Quality of affordable housing information system √
Public Policies and Regulatory Constraints to Housing Options Lack of regional cooperation √
Land use and zoning laws √
Public/Private Investment
Deteriorated properties √
Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods √ √ √ √ Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods √ √ √ √ Fair Housing Services, Outreach/Education, and Enforcement Lack of local private fair housing outreach and enforcement √ Lack of local public fair housing enforcement √
Private discrimination √ √ √
Source of income discrimination √ √
Transportation and Access to Services
Access to financial services √
Appendix | Fair Housing Assessment
F-59
FAppendix
November 2021
Potential Contributing Factors
Fair Housing Issues
1. Segregation/Integration
2. R/ECAPs
3. Disparities in Access to
Opportunity
4. Disproportionate Housing
Needs
5. Publicly Supported Housing
Location and Occupancy
6. Disability and Access Issues
7. Fair Housing Enforcement,
Outreach Capacity, and Resources
Lending discrimination √ √ √ √
Location of employers √
Location of environmental health hazards √ √
Location of proficient schools and school assignment
policies √
*R/ECAPs: Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty Housing Element | City of Long Beach
F-60
Appendix
F
This page left intentionally blank
Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 1
November 2021
C-1
Appendix
Appendix C-1 7
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 2
November 2021
Appendix
C-1
Appendix C-1: Recent Entitlement & Building Permit Data to PlaceType Density Assumptions ..................................................................................................................... C-1-1 Appendix C-17
Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 1
November 2021
C-1
Appendix
Appendix C-1: Recent Entitlement & Building Permit Data to PlaceType Density Assumptions Assumptions for PlaceType densities and affordability levels (Table C-5) were derived from average densities for recent entitlement and building permit projects that most closely correspond to the density and height limits for each PlaceType. Appendix C-1 provides more detailed information on the recent entitlement and building permit projects analyzed to derive the averages used to develop estimated dwelling unit potential of sites on the site inventory.
Table C-1-1
Recent Entitlement Applications Analyzed to Help Estimate Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes APN Project_Name Project_Type Address Units Stories du_ac placetype major_area zone_desc SHAPE_Area (sf) acres 7075028014 Dorado Market 3655 Norwalk Boulevard 40 2 6.9 FCN Other City R-1-M 251,002 5.76 7281017071 Broadway Block Market & Affordable 330 E. 3rd St 432 23 215.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 87,503 2.01 7131032911 City Ventures Market 5100 Long Beach Blvd 38 3 22.0 NSC-L Other City CCN 75,209 1.73 7278005154 Oceanaire Market 150 W. Ocean Boulevard 216 7 126.9 WF Other City PD-6 74,147 1.70 7209022028 201-245 PCH and 1827 Pacific Avenue Market 201 W Pacific Coast Highway 138 5 92.3 TOD-L Other City CCA 65,156 1.50 7273003501 The Beacon Affordable 1235 Long Beach Boulevard 160 7 107.6 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown PD-30 64,791 1.49 7133010900 City Ventures Market 4800 Long Beach Blvd 18 3 16.3 NSC-L Other City R-4-N 48,167 1.11 7273024024 Pacific-Pine Market 635 Pine Avenue 271 8 262.3 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 45,006 1.03 7269019044 Las Ventanas Apartments Affordable 1795 Long Beach Boulevard 102 5 100.4 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 44,237 1.02 7209009028 The Spark at Midtown Affordable 1900 Long Beach Boulevard 95 5 102.2 TOD-L Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 40,500 0.93 7264019012 Silversands Market 2010 E. Ocean Boulevard 33 7 36.5 WF Other City PD-5 39,391 0.90 7269037038 Bloom at Magnolia Affordable 469 W. 17th Street 40 4 44.8 MFR-M Other City R-4-N 38,907 0.89 7280022009 The Pacific Market 230 W. 3rd Street 163 8 182.6 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,892 0.89 7281017500 Huxton Market 227 Elm Avenue 40 3 45.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,544 0.88 7269023026 Long Beach Garden Condominiums Market 1570 Long Beach Boulevard 36 3 44.2 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 35,477 0.81 7262027001 7th St/Dawson Market 2200 E. 7th St 23 3 29.4 NSC-M Other City CCA 34,089 0.78 7281021223 The Alamitos Market 101 Alamitos Avenue 136 7 179.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 32,972 0.76 7210013026 Mercy Senior Housing Affordable 901 E. Pacific Coast Highway 68 4 92.9 NSC-M Other City CHW 31,869 0.73 7278007043 Sonata Modern Flats Market 207 Seaside Way 113 5 170.2 WF Other City PD-6 28,918 0.66 7209015034 Vistas del Puerto Affordable 1836 Locust Avenue 48 5 78.1 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 26,771 0.61 7275001083 320 Alamitos Avenue Market 320 Alamitos Avenue 77 7 131.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 25,557 0.59 7278027029 442 Residences Market 442 W. Ocean Boulevard 95 8 175.3 WF Other City PD-6 23,602 0.54 7278007049 Ocean View Tower Market 200 W. Ocean Boulevard 106 9 202.9 WF Other City PD-6 22,755 0.52 7269016157 Axiom Apartments Affordable 1401 Long Beach Boulevard 150 328.5 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 19,890 0.46 7268014001 1405 Lewis Avenue/1000 New York Street Market 1405 Lewis Avenue 19 47.0 FCN Other City R-1-N 17,606 0.40 7281010056 The Linden Market 434 E. 4th Street 49 6 143.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 14,831 0.34 7280005064 The Place at the Streets Market 495 The Promenade North 20 4 65.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 13,383 0.31 7281019047 135 Linden Avenue Market 135 Linden Avenue 82 7 320.8 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 11,135 0.26 7274020050 825 East 7th Street Market 825 E. 7th Street 27 5 134.2 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 8,765 0.20 7274023007 1028 E. 10th Street Market 1028 E. 10th St 5 3 28.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,528 0.17 Recent Entitlement Applications Analyzed to Help Estimate Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 2
November 2021
Appendix
C-1
APN app_num entitlement addr_combined zip start_date num_units current_use status proposed_use issued_date final_date du_ac placetype major_area zone_desc SHAPE_Area (sf) acres 7280022007 BNEW187969 245 W BROADWAY 90802 2016-02-25 0:00:00 222 Vacant Issued Apartment 3/28/2017 129.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 74,892 1.72 7278005150 BNEW180416 Y 150 W OCEAN 90802 2015-08-12 0:00:00 216 Apartment Closed Apartment 4/6/2017 9/23/2019 127.1 WF Other City PD-6 74,022 1.70 7273003050 BNEW196474 Y 1235 LONG BEACH 90813 2016-09-29 0:00:00 160 Mix use Closed Mix use 5/16/2017 3/13/2020 107.6 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown PD-30 64,791 1.49 7209009027 BNEW225778 Y 1900 LONG BEACH 90806 2018-10-05 0:00:00 95 Vacant Issued Mixed Use Building 3/15/2019 102.2 TOD-L Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 40,500 0.93 7280022008 BNEW199562 Y 230 W 3RD 90802 2016-12-15 0:00:00 163 Vacant Lot Issued Apartments 9/29/2017 9/30/2020 182.6 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 38,892 0.89 7269023019 BNEW182565 Y 1570 LONG BEACH 90813 2015-10-06 0:00:00 36 Mixed Use Issued Mixed Use 9/13/2017 44.2 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-CDR 35,477 0.81 7278015045 BNEW222185 500 W BROADWAY 90802 2018-07-11 0:00:00 142 Vacant Issued Mixed Use 12/20/2019 178.5 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 34,644 0.80 7281021018 BNEW193742 Y 101 ALAMITOS 90802 2016-07-21 0:00:00 136 VACANT Issued MIXED USE BUILDING 7/10/2017 10/7/2020 179.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 32,972 0.76 7273024009 BNEW220809 Y 636 PACIFIC 90802 2018-06-08 0:00:00 194 Vacant Issued Apartment 5/21/2019 281.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 30,000 0.69 7278007041 BNEW188090 Y 207 E SEASIDE 90802 2016-02-29 0:00:00 112 Vacant Issued Apartments 3/15/2017 5/19/2020 168.7 WF Other City PD-6 28,918 0.66 7209015018 BNEW220754 Y 1836 LOCUST 90806 2018-06-07 0:00:00 48 NEW Issued APARTMENT 12/17/2018 78.1 TOD-M Downtown & Midtown SP-1-TN 26,771 0.61 7281022058 BNEW219125 777 E OCEAN 90802 2018-04-26 0:00:00 315 Vacant Issued Apartment 9/20/2019 572.7 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 23,957 0.55 7278007049 BRMD200036 Y 200 W OCEAN 90802 2016-12-30 0:00:00 96 COMMERCIAL Issued APARTMENTS 12/20/2019 183.8 WF Other City PD-6 22,755 0.52 7273007047 BNEW226839 1112 LOCUST 90813 2018-10-31 0:00:00 97 Vacant Issued Apartment building 7/9/2020 190.3 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 22,200 0.51 7278007035 BRMD172741 110 W OCEAN 90802 2015-01-16 0:00:00 74 Issued Apartments 1/17/2020 162.0 WF Other City PD-6 19,897 0.46 7273024007 BNEW220811 Y 635 PINE 90802 2018-06-08 0:00:00 77 Vacant Issued Mixed Use Building 5/16/2019 223.5 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 15,006 0.34 7281010001 BNEW198817 Y 434 E 4TH 90802 2016-11-30 0:00:00 49 Vacant Lot Closed APARTMENT & RETAIL 7/28/2017 10/21/2019 143.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 14,831 0.34 7280005064 BNEW182244 Y 495 THE PROMENADE NORTH 90802 2015-09-29 0:00:00 20 .VACANT Issued COM & APARTMENT 12/4/2017 65.1 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 13,383 0.31 7281002024 BNEW219803 425 E 5TH 90802 2018-05-15 0:00:00 18 VACANT Issued 16-UNIT APARTMENT 10/17/2019 103.9 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,547 0.17 7281002025 BNEW199787 437 E 5TH 90802 2016-12-22 0:00:00 18 VACANT LOT Issued MIXED USE 10/3/2018 108.0 DT Downtown & Midtown PD-30 7,257 0.17 Recent Building Permits Analyzed to Derive Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Table C-1-2
Recent Building Permits Analyzed to Derive Density Assumptions for the Most Closely Related PlaceTypes Appendix C-1 | Entitlement and Permit Data
C-1 - 3
November 2021
C-1
Appendix
Table C-1-3
Summary and Analysis
Building Permits by Zoning Entitlements by Zoning ***Note: These summary tables do not break out project averages by height limit and were solely used as informational for deriving general counts of project data zone_desc Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac CCN 2 42.1 41.5 42.8 CCA 2 60.8 29.4 92.3
PD-30 27 167.5 51.2 572.7 CCN 1 22.0 22.0 22.0
PD-31 2 47.7 42.6 52.9 CHW 1 92.9 92.9 92.9
PD-5 1 61.9 61.9 61.9 PD-30 12 151.4 28.9 320.8
PD-6 5 163.0 127.1 183.8 PD-5 1 36.5 36.5 36.5
R-1-N 1 47.0 47.0 47.0 PD-6 4 168.8 126.9 202.9
R-2-A 1 52.0 52.0 52.0 R-1-M 1 6.9 6.9 6.9
R-4-N 1 44.8 44.8 44.8 R-1-N 1 47.0 47.0 47.0
R-4-R 1 90.0 90.0 90.0 R-4-N 2 30.5 16.3 44.8
SP-1-CDR 3 67.7 44.2 102.2 SP-1-CDR 2 73.2 44.2 102.2
SP-1-TN 2 67.6 57.1 78.1 SP-1-TN 3 169.0 78.1 328.5
(blank) (blank)
Grand Total 46 133.7 41.5 572.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 addr_combined (Multiple Items)
Building Permits by PlaceType Entitlements by PlaceType placetype Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac DT 22 143.5 51.2 281.7 DT 11 155.4 28.9 320.8
FCN 2 49.5 47.0 52.0 FCN 2 27.0 6.9 47.0
MFR-M 1 44.8 44.8 44.8 MFR-M 1 44.8 44.8 44.8
NSC-M 2 42.1 41.5 42.8 NSC-L 2 19.1 16.3 22.0
RSF 2 47.7 42.6 52.9 NSC-M 2 61.2 29.4 92.9
TOD-L 3 83.0 56.7 102.2 TOD-L 2 97.2 92.3 102.2
TOD-M 6 85.7 44.2 127.9 TOD-M 5 131.8 44.2 328.5
WF 6 146.2 61.9 183.8 WF 5 142.4 36.5 202.9
(blank) (blank)
Grand Total 44 116.4 41.5 281.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 Building Permits by Major Area Entitlements by Major Area major_area Count of app_numAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Row Labels Count of Project_NameAverage of du_ac Min of du_ac Max of du_ac Downtown & Midtown 32 151.9 44.2 572.7 Downtown & Midtown 17 145.3 28.9 328.5 Other City 14 92.2 41.5 183.8 Other City 13 81.8 6.9 202.9 (blank) (blank)
Grand Total 46 133.7 41.5 572.7 Grand Total 30 117.8 6.9 328.5 Summary & Analysis
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-1 - 4
November 2021
Appendix
C-1
This page left intentionally blank
Appendix C-2 | Market Reports
C-2 - 171
November 2021
C-2
Appendix
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
Draft - November 2021
Appendix C-2 7
Draft - November 2021
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-2 - 172
November 2021
Appendix
C-2
Appendix C-2: Market Reports Used to Support Findings that Sites Will Develop During the Planning Period ....................................................................... C-2-1 Appendix C-27
Appendix C-2 | Market Reports
C-2 - 1
November 2021
C-2
Appendix
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
Draft - November 2021
Appendix C-2: Market Reports
Used to Support Findings that
Sites Will Develop During the
Planning Period for Sites in the
Site Inventory under the
PlaceTypes Scenario
The following
reports describe commercial office
and retail trends in Long Beach and the Los Angeles
Region. The reports show that commercial office and
retail are experiencing high vacancy rates, higher
rates in Long Beach compared to the region, with as
high as 50% vacancy rates for Long Beach malls in the
suburban submarket, compared to 9% vacancy rates for
the Los Angeles region. These reports help comprise
the substantial evidence upon which the City found
that underutilized commercial sites on the site inventory are likely to develop during the planning period.
Draft - November 2021
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-2 - 2
November 2021
Appendix
C-2
This page left intentionally blank
Long Beach: Suburban
PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Office Submarket Report
Los Angeles - CA
OFFICE SUBMARKET REPORT
Submarket Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 5
Construction 7
Sales 10
Sales Past 12 Months 12
Supply & Demand Trends 14
Rent & Vacancy 16
Sale Trends 18
Long Beach: Suburban Office
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview
Long Beach: Suburban Office
16.5K (416K) 12.5% 1.7%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Long Beach Suburban Submarket offers employers
a central location to draw labor from many areas of Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Office rents are cheaper
than in many other locations in the L.A. metro. Tenancy is diverse, with general corporate, aerospace, medical
services, and government tenants making up much of
the area's tenancy. Large tenants in the submarket
include Boeing, Continental DataGraphics, and SCAN
Health Plan. Inventory is spread throughout the
submarket, but the lion's share of 4 & 5 Star inventory is located close to the Long Beach Airport.
Although submarket vacancy is below the metro average,
the submarket has seen vacancy rise in recent quarters
like the Greater Los Angeles office market. Rental rates peaked in 20Q1 and have moved sideways since.
Looking at construction, supply additions in the
submarket have been modest, with the last major
deliveries in 2017 and 2018 in the Douglas Park mixed-
use project. The current construction pipeline comprises one medical office building and a build-to-suit for
software firm Laserfiche.
KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$36.0425.4%2,858,4464 & 5 Star 25.9% (5,625) 0 100,000
$33.547.2%3,897,1743 Star 10.3% 0 0 0
$27.157.6%3,266,2301 & 2 Star 7.6% (1,645) 0 0
$32.2112.5%10,021,850Submarket 14.0% (7,270) 0 100,000
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When
13.5%8.9%4.3%Vacancy Change (YOY) 14.9% 1999 Q2 4.5% 2007 Q3 (26,448)3,698(416K)Net Absorption SF 646,024 2001 Q2 (487,881) 2011 Q1 27,00745,20416.5KDeliveries SF 200,993 2001 Q2 0 2020 Q3
2.6%3.2%1.7%Rent Growth 10.7% 2007 Q4 -7.8% 2009 Q4
N/A$50.2M$47.7MSales Volume $164.6M 2006 Q4 $5.9M 1997 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Office
Submarket vacancy in Suburban Long Beach is presently
12.5%, up considerably from 5.5% in 19Q2. Several
major move-outs in the submarket since the second half
of 2019 precipitated the recent sharp rise in vacancies.
The pandemic has also hindered occupancies by
restraining tenant activity since early 2020.
Japanese electronics firm Epson's 140,000-SF lease
terminated in November 2020 at 3840 Kilroy Airport Way
in the Kilroy Airport Center, leaving the property 100% vacant. Epson was in the space for over two decades,
having occupied the space since late 1999. The landlord, Kilroy Realty Corporation, has been marketing the entire building for lease since early 2019, when it learned
Epson would not be renewing.
The submarket saw another setback in 19Q3, when the
Port of Long Beach vacated its 180,000-SF
headquarters by the airport at 4801 Airport Plaza Dr. for its recently completed headquarters in Downtown Long
Beach. The property stood 100% vacant for a year,
although Long Beach Public Transportation moved into
45,500 SF in the property this past September.
In July 2020, SCS Engineers renewed its 24,300-SF
lease for an additional three years on its space, as well as committing to an additional 10,000 SF, at the Kilroy Airport Center.
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Office
VACANCY RATE
AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Office
4 & 5 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating RBA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 31,5283780 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 221,452 8 7.0% 669
5,4133760 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 166,761 1 10.2% 423
5,0184401 N Atlantic Ave
Bixby Business Center 60,471 1 3.0% 0
10,2895000 E Spring St
Bldg H 166,246 4 6.0% (3,035)
16,0744300 Long Beach Blvd
Long Beach Corporate Center… 137,497 6 7.7% (3,479)
15,9045150 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Park Tower 119,517 5 3.8% (6,657)
3 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating RBA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 5,6125001 Airport Plaza Dr
Bldg B 52,401 1 15.9% 5,612
9,5424265 Conant St
The Terminal at Douglas Park 24,889 2 7.7% 4,356
3,5044010 Watson Plaza Dr 56,901 1 21.0% 3,504
1,4401650 Ximeno Ave
Comerica Bank Bldg 25,086 1 11.6% 2,960
2,5693932 Long Beach Blvd 7,400 1 0% 2,346
2,9083900 Kilroy Airport Way
Aero 130,935 1 9.3% 534
2,6443960 Paramount Blvd 35,686 1 1.5% 230
2,3563738 Bayer Ave 25,301 1 1.9% 0
12,2003950 Paramount Blvd 38,970 3 25.2% (1,285)
4,5075000 Airport Plaza Dr
Bldg A 73,818 1 6.2% (1,971)
3,8942883 E Spring St
Daugherty Sky Harbor Office… 36,302 1 4.2% (3,836)
2,2911501 Hughes Way
Freeway Business Center 78,404 1 3.9% (4,293)
6244510 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Circle Business Center 2 79,764 1 15.5% (5,261)
5813711 Long Beach Blvd 117,386 1 21.5% (6,601)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Rent
Long Beach: Suburban Office
Office rental rates in the Suburban Long Beach
Submarket are currently seeing year-over-year gains of
1.7%, compared to flat of 0.0% across the Greater L.A.
office market. Average asking rents in the submarket, at $32.00/SF, are at an over 20% discount to greater
market averages.
MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Rent
Long Beach: Suburban Office
MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Office
The Long Beach Suburban Submarket currently has
several office projects underway. The largest is a build- to-suit for Laserfiche, a software firm that is a leader in enterprise content management, at 3443 Long Beach
Blvd. The 100,000-SF project commenced construction
during summer 2019 and is anticipated to wrap up later
this year. Laserfiche has been in Long Beach since
2001. The firm vacated 63,000 SF up the street at 3545
Long Beach Blvd. in August. Laserfiche owns 3545 Long
Beach Blvd. and is marketing the property for sale or for lease.
Across the street from 3443 Long Beach Blvd., an
18,700-SF medical office property is underway at 3450
Long Beach Blvd. Completion is slated for late 2021.
Supply additions have been modest during the past
decade. The largest completions seen in the area during that time were in the master-planned, mixed-use
Douglas Park near the Long Beach Airport. Five
buildings totaling 134,000 SF delivered in the project in 2017–18.
DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Office
43,524 17,007 100,000 112,515
All-Time Annual Avg. Square Feet Delivered Square Feet Past 8 Qtrs Delivered Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs Proposed Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs PAST 8 QUARTERS DELIVERIES, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, & PROPOSED
PAST & FUTURE DELIVERIES IN SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Office
RECENT DELIVERIES
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Sep 202012309 Carson St 2,500 1 May 2021 -
Penelope Anagnos
1 Dec 20184251 Long Beach Blvd 8,559 1 Mar 2021 -
Mike Bardi, D.D.S.
2 Mar 20201000 E New York St
The Vault 5,948 3 Oct 2020 -
Elizabeth J Carnes
3 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Oct 20203443 Long Beach Blvd
Laserfiche 100,000 4 Nov 2021 Urbana Development
Laserfiche®
1 PROPOSED
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Jan 20223810 Stineman Ct
Building #2 33,341 2 Oct 2022 -
Sares-Regis Group
1 Oct 20213009 Long Beach Blvd 30,000 2 Jan 2022 -
Mike Bareh
2 Jan 20223816 Stineman Ct
Building #1 27,460 2 Oct 2022 -
Sares-Regis Group
3 Mar 20223450 Long Beach Blvd 18,714 3 Sep 2023 -
Urbana Development
4 Oct 20212600 California Ave 3,000 1 Oct 2022 -
Sean & Linda Hitchcock
5 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Sales
Long Beach: Suburban Office
The Suburban Long Beach Submarket witnessed $48.7
million worth of office sales during the past year. The average modeled market price per SF, $290, and market
cap rate, 6.2%, in the submarket represent a discount to greater market averages.
In March 2021, 3939 Atlantic Ave., a 54,000-SF medical
office asset, traded between two private individuals for $9.9 million ($185/SF). In February 2021, a private buyer purchased 1525 Long Beach Blvd., another medical
office property, from Texas-based Cross Development
for $8 million ($930/SF) at a 5.35% in-place cap rate.
The 8,600-SF property was 100% leased by Fresenius
Kidney Care on a triple net basis.
SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Sales
Long Beach: Suburban Office
MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Sales Past 12 Months
Long Beach: Suburban Office
16 4.7% $268 7.4%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale
SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS
SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $699,000 $3,463,000 $1,975,000 $9,900,000
Price/SF $162 $268 $336 $930
Cap Rate 3.9% 4.7% 4.8% 5.4%
Time Since Sale in Months 1.0 5.0 5.0 9.3
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 1,900 13,077 7,210 54,103
Stories 1 1 1 2
Typical Floor SF 1,900 7,849 5,107 27,052
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 7.4% 0% 100%
Year Built 1925 1962 1966 1984
Star Rating
2.2 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Sales Past 12 Months
Long Beach: Suburban Office
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate
RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Atlantic Business Center 1983 54,103 0% $9,900,000 $183 3939 Atlantic Ave
3/1/2021 3.9%
-
2 1525 Long Beach Blvd 1949 8,600 0% $7,995,000 $9302/18/2021 5.4% -
3 Cawrey Community Med… 1984 23,215 0% $6,354,000 $274
1703 Termino Ave
12/30/2020 -
-
4 Los Altos Medical Bldg 2 1979 25,400 51.3% $6,283,170 $247 3325 Palo Verde Ave
8/11/2021 -
-
5 Los Altos Medical Bldg 1979 26,000 0% $4,303,336 $166 3320 N Los Coyotes Diag
8/11/2021 -
-
6 4101-4107 Long Beach B… 1951 7,246 0% $2,757,000 $38012/29/2020 - -
7 1040-1042 E Wardlow Rd 1974 4,800 0% $1,975,000 $4119/9/2021 - -
8 1355 Redondo Ave 1980 7,210 0% $1,535,000 $2138/2/2021 - -
9 Elm Avenue Medical Plaza 1982 3,120 6.7% $1,025,000 $329 2650 Elm Ave
3/25/2021 4.3%
-
10 5355 E Carson St 1966 2,372 0% $960,000 $4052/2/2021 - -
9 Elm Avenue Medical Plaza 1982 3,440 0% $917,000 $267
2650 Elm Ave
8/12/2021 5.3%
-
11 1150 E Wardlow Rd 1939 5,107 0% $825,000 $1628/25/2021 - -
12 4301 Atlantic Ave 1953 1,160 0% $720,000 $6216/21/2021 - -
13 3323 Lime Ave 1960 2,009 100% $720,000 $3582/1/2021 - -
14 4709-4711 Long Beach B… 1941 1,900 0% $712,500 $3751/8/2021 - -
15 2429 Pacific Ave 1925 2,040 0% $699,000 $3438/25/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Supply & Demand Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Office
OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (16,001) -0.2% 0.2%18,908 -10,033,800
2024 (24,154) -0.2% 0.1%10,501 -10,049,801
2023 (8,399) -0.1% 0.2%17,376 -10,073,955
2022 (27,024) -0.3% -1.0%(103,141) -10,082,354
2021 98,587 1.0% -2.1%(211,089) -10,109,378
YTD 11,059 0.1% -2.3%(232,020) -10,021,850
2020 5,948 0.1% -1.2%(116,002) -10,010,791
2019 (4,160) 0% -3.8%(385,179) -10,004,843
2018 41,192 0.4% 0.9%93,475 0.410,009,003
2017 87,200 0.9% 1.8%178,145 0.59,967,811
2016 40,000 0.4% 2.6%255,065 0.29,880,611
2015 109,604 1.1% 2.3%221,533 0.59,840,611
2014 19,261 0.2% 2.8%276,272 0.19,731,007
2013 (15,817) -0.2% 0.7%70,553 -9,711,746
2012 (4,500) 0% -1.0%(98,838) -9,727,563
2011 (398,124) -3.9% -2.8%(276,019) -9,732,063
2010 3,600 0% -3.4%(349,312) -10,130,187
2009 133,101 1.3% -1.6%(165,843) -10,126,587
4 & 5 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 10,994 0.4% 1.2%34,261 0.32,966,389
2024 2,897 0.1% 0.7%20,736 0.12,955,395
2023 0 0% -0.3%(8,383) -2,952,498
2022 0 0% -1.4%(40,035) -2,952,498
2021 94,052 3.3% -3.5%(101,924) -2,952,498
YTD 0 0% -6.4%(184,039) -2,858,446
2020 5,948 0.2% 0.7%19,954 0.32,858,446
2019 0 0% -13.7%(389,593) -2,852,498
2018 0 0% 1.9%54,240 02,852,498
2017 0 0% 3.6%102,225 02,852,498
2016 0 0% 1.6%45,107 02,852,498
2015 88,018 3.2% 3.8%108,623 0.82,852,498
2014 38,790 1.4% 7.1%196,285 0.22,764,480
2013 0 0% 1.9%50,761 02,725,690
2012 0 0% -1.8%(48,119) -2,725,690
2011 0 0% -3.8%(103,213) -2,725,690
2010 0 0% -5.6%(153,533) -2,725,690
2009 0 0% 0.1%2,562 02,725,690
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Supply & Demand Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 0 0% 0.3%10,290 03,915,888
2024 0 0% 0.4%14,179 03,915,888
2023 18,714 0.5% 0.9%33,615 0.63,915,888
2022 0 0% -0.5%(19,061) -3,897,174
2021 11,059 0.3% -2.7%(104,969) -3,897,174
YTD 11,059 0.3% -1.7%(64,323) -3,897,174
2020 0 0% -2.0%(77,592) -3,886,115
2019 0 0% 1.1%41,977 03,886,115
2018 49,832 1.3% 0.5%18,434 2.73,886,115
2017 90,948 2.4% 3.4%132,144 0.73,836,283
2016 40,000 1.1% 4.0%148,284 0.33,745,335
2015 21,586 0.6% 2.4%88,617 0.23,705,335
2014 (7,000) -0.2% 1.8%68,076 -3,683,749
2013 (1,875) -0.1% 1.7%60,985 -3,690,749
2012 0 0% -2.4%(88,490) -3,692,624
2011 (398,124) -9.7% -4.0%(147,513) -3,692,624
2010 0 0% -5.0%(204,912) -4,090,748
2009 172,090 4.4% -1.6%(64,009) -4,090,748
1 & 2 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (26,995) -0.8% -0.8%(25,643) -3,151,523
2024 (27,051) -0.8% -0.8%(24,414) -3,178,518
2023 (27,113) -0.8% -0.2%(7,856) -3,205,569
2022 (27,024) -0.8% -1.4%(44,045) -3,232,682
2021 (6,524) -0.2% -0.1%(4,196) -3,259,706
YTD 0 0% 0.5%16,342 03,266,230
2020 0 0% -1.8%(58,364) -3,266,230
2019 (4,160) -0.1% -1.2%(37,563) -3,266,230
2018 (8,640) -0.3% 0.6%20,801 -3,270,390
2017 (3,748) -0.1% -1.7%(56,224) -3,279,030
2016 0 0% 1.9%61,674 03,282,778
2015 0 0% 0.7%24,293 03,282,778
2014 (12,529) -0.4% 0.4%11,911 -3,282,778
2013 (13,942) -0.4% -1.3%(41,193) -3,295,307
2012 (4,500) -0.1% 1.1%37,771 -3,309,249
2011 0 0% -0.8%(25,293) -3,313,749
2010 3,600 0.1% 0.3%9,133 0.43,313,749
2009 (38,989) -1.2% -3.2%(104,396) -3,310,149
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Rent & Vacancy
Long Beach: Suburban Office
OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 147 3.1% 13.0%$35.95 1,312,810 13.1% -0.3%
2024 143 4.0% 9.6%$34.88 1,347,296 13.4% -0.3%
2023 137 4.6% 5.4%$33.54 1,381,891 13.7% -0.2%
2022 131 0.3% 0.8%$32.07 1,406,743 14.0% 0.8%
2021 131 0.5% 0.5%$31.98 1,329,904 13.2% 3.0%
YTD 132 1.7% 1.3%$32.21 1,256,751 12.5% 2.4%
2020 130 0.8% 0%$31.81 1,013,672 10.1% 1.2%
2019 129 1.9% -0.8%$31.55 890,910 8.9% 3.8%
2018 127 8.7% -2.7%$30.96 509,891 5.1% -0.5%
2017 117 5.4% -10.5%$28.47 562,174 5.6% -1.0%
2016 111 7.0% -15.1%$27.02 653,119 6.6% -2.2%
2015 103 6.9% -20.7%$25.24 868,184 8.8% -1.2%
2014 97 4.7% -25.8%$23.61 980,113 10.1% -2.7%
2013 92 2.9% -29.1%$22.55 1,237,124 12.7% -0.9%
2012 90 2.1% -31.1%$21.91 1,323,494 13.6% 1.0%
2011 88 -1.5% -32.6%$21.45 1,229,156 12.6% -0.7%
2010 89 -3.2% -31.5%$21.79 1,351,261 13.3% 3.5%
2009 92 -7.8% -29.2%$22.52 998,349 9.9% 2.9%
4 & 5 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 151 3.1% 11.0%$40.09 750,172 25.3% -0.9%
2024 147 3.9% 7.7%$38.91 773,479 26.2% -0.6%
2023 141 4.5% 3.6%$37.44 791,353 26.8% 0.3%
2022 135 0.2% -0.8%$35.83 782,970 26.5% 1.4%
2021 135 -0.7% -1.1%$35.75 742,935 25.2% 6.2%
YTD 136 -0.5% -0.3%$36.04 725,050 25.4% 6.4%
2020 136 -0.4% -0.4%$36.01 541,011 18.9% -0.5%
2019 136 0.5% 0%$36.13 554,205 19.4% 13.7%
2018 136 14.3% -0.5%$35.94 164,612 5.8% -1.9%
2017 119 6.4% -13.0%$31.44 218,852 7.7% -3.6%
2016 111 5.0% -18.2%$29.54 321,077 11.3% -1.6%
2015 106 9.6% -22.1%$28.13 366,184 12.8% -1.2%
2014 97 2.5% -29.0%$25.66 386,789 14.0% -6.0%
2013 94 3.6% -30.7%$25.04 544,284 20.0% -1.9%
2012 91 -0.3% -33.1%$24.18 595,045 21.8% 1.8%
2011 92 0.9% -32.9%$24.25 546,926 20.1% 3.8%
2010 91 0.4% -33.5%$24.04 443,713 16.3% 5.6%
2009 90 -9.6% -33.7%$23.95 290,180 10.6% -0.1%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Rent & Vacancy
Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 146 3.0% 13.2%$37.28 302,437 7.7% -0.3%
2024 142 3.9% 9.9%$36.21 312,727 8.0% -0.4%
2023 137 4.5% 5.8%$34.86 326,906 8.3% -0.4%
2022 131 0.2% 1.3%$33.37 341,807 8.8% 0.5%
2021 131 1.5% 1.1%$33.29 322,746 8.3% 3.0%
YTD 131 3.1% 1.8%$33.54 282,100 7.2% 1.9%
2020 129 -0.4% -0.4%$32.80 206,718 5.3% 2.0%
2019 129 4.1% 0%$32.94 129,126 3.3% -1.1%
2018 124 5.8% -4.0%$31.63 171,103 4.4% 0.8%
2017 117 3.8% -9.3%$29.88 139,705 3.6% -1.2%
2016 113 7.5% -12.6%$28.78 180,901 4.8% -3.0%
2015 105 6.6% -18.8%$26.76 289,185 7.8% -1.9%
2014 98 6.0% -23.8%$25.09 356,216 9.7% -2.0%
2013 93 3.1% -28.1%$23.67 431,292 11.7% -1.7%
2012 90 3.7% -30.3%$22.96 494,152 13.4% 2.4%
2011 87 -1.2% -32.8%$22.13 405,662 11.0% -5.1%
2010 88 -4.9% -32.0%$22.40 656,273 16.0% 5.0%
2009 92 -7.7% -28.5%$23.56 451,361 11.0% 5.5%
1 & 2 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 144 3.2% 14.1%$30.61 260,201 8.3% 0%
2024 139 4.2% 10.5%$29.65 261,090 8.2% 0%
2023 134 4.8% 6.0%$28.44 263,632 8.2% -0.5%
2022 127 0.5% 1.1%$27.14 281,966 8.7% 0.6%
2021 127 0.6% 0.6%$26.99 264,223 8.1% 0%
YTD 128 2.2% 1.2%$27.15 249,601 7.6% -0.5%
2020 126 4.2% 0%$26.84 265,943 8.1% 1.8%
2019 121 0.4% -4.0%$25.76 207,579 6.4% 1.0%
2018 120 6.4% -4.4%$25.65 174,176 5.3% -0.9%
2017 113 6.5% -10.2%$24.09 203,617 6.2% 1.6%
2016 106 8.8% -15.7%$22.63 151,141 4.6% -1.9%
2015 98 4.1% -22.5%$20.80 212,815 6.5% -0.7%
2014 94 5.3% -25.5%$19.98 237,108 7.2% -0.7%
2013 89 1.9% -29.3%$18.97 261,548 7.9% 0.9%
2012 87 2.8% -30.6%$18.61 234,297 7.1% -1.3%
2011 85 -4.8% -32.5%$18.11 276,568 8.3% 0.8%
2010 89 -4.8% -29.1%$19.02 251,275 7.6% -0.2%
2009 94 -6.1% -25.5%$19.98 256,808 7.8% 2.0%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Sale Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Office
OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 190- $319.70 6.2%
2024 -- - -- 184- $310.17 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 177- $297.39 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 168- $282.67 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 170- $286.47 6.1%
YTD $38.6M14 1.5% $261.92$3,264,364 1704.7% $286.99 6.2% 2020 $50.6M13 2.3% $222.78$4,115,250 1667.0% $279.23 6.2% 2019 $51.8M22 2.6% $240.17$3,986,063 1655.2% $277.81 6.2% 2018 $79.5M36 3.5% $247.03$3,149,257 1595.9% $267.47 6.1% 2017 $103.1M62 7.0% $180.80$3,889,280 1535.4% $257.84 6.1% 2016 $83.5M40 4.1% $230.48$2,961,185 1475.5% $247.06 6.1% 2015 $45.3M26 2.9% $184.33$2,664,853 1395.9% $234 6.1%
2014 $35.5M19 2.0% $194.50$2,368,100 1297.2% $217.66 6.2% 2013 $31.1M22 2.0% $186.92$1,941,894 1197.9% $200.44 6.4% 2012 $111.2M39 10.1% $121.47$4,711,609 1127.2% $189.28 6.7% 2011 $42.3M19 2.6% $191.79$4,439,385 108- $181.18 6.9%
2010 $24M11 3.0% $142.55$4,000,833 988.6% $164.57 7.4%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 4 & 5 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 179- $305.28 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 173- $296.02 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 166- $283.87 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 158- $269.99 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 160- $273.74 6.1%
YTD -- - -- 163- $277.77 6.1%
2020 -- - -- 158- $269.70 6.2%
2019 -- - -- 158- $269.82 6.1%
2018 -- - -- 153- $260.59 6.1%
2017 $12M2 5.4% $78.55$6,000,000 148- $253.43 6.0%
2016 $25.8M1 4.2% $215.58$25,765,000 1427.5% $242.43 6.0% 2015 -- - -- 138- $235.30 5.9%
2014 $16M1 2.6% $223.93$16,000,000 1298.5% $221.17 6.0% 2013 -- - -- 120- $205.55 6.2%
2012 $83.3M2 24.4% $124.92$41,625,000 1156.8% $196.21 6.4% 2011 $21.5M1 4.4% $179.89$21,500,215 111- $188.84 6.6%
2010 $16M1 4.4% $133.87$16,000,000 100- $171.57 7.1%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Sale Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Office
3 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 188- $316.64 6.2%
2024 -- - -- 182- $307.71 6.2%
2023 -- - -- 175- $295.48 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 167- $281.30 6.2%
2021 -- - -- 169- $285.52 6.2%
YTD $6.3M2 0.8% $203.84$3,139,168 169- $285.02 6.2%
2020 $37.6M5 4.8% $200.50$9,098,000 1647.0% $276.62 6.3% 2019 $38.7M6 4.6% $231.69$9,664,706 1645.3% $276.84 6.2% 2018 $57.8M15 6.2% $245.55$5,976,167 1585.2% $266.39 6.2% 2017 $49M25 6.9% $212.61$8,617,000 1536.1% $257.49 6.1% 2016 $28.1M9 2.5% $305.34$3,126,722 1475.0% $248.18 6.1% 2015 $17.8M2 2.5% $194.13$8,887,500 1407.4% $235.38 6.1% 2014 $1.1M1 0.3% $112.14$1,100,000 131- $220.20 6.2%
2013 $21.5M3 2.8% $208.80$7,167,230 1217.9% $203.43 6.4% 2012 $13.3M8 2.6% $159.20$2,611,750 1147.2% $192.48 6.6% 2011 $13.7M5 2.1% $187.39$5,659,500 109- $183.23 6.8%
2010 $875K1 0.2% $89.20$875,000 98- $165.58 7.3%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 1 & 2 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 203- $336.38 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 197- $325.88 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 188- $311.86 6.1%
2022 -- - -- 178- $295.75 6.1%
2021 -- - -- 180- $299.10 6.1%
YTD $32.3M12 3.6% $277.27$3,292,186 1804.7% $297.70 6.1% 2020 $13M8 1.2% $328.36$1,623,875 176- $290.95 6.2%
2019 $13.2M16 2.3% $269.11$1,462,222 1735.0% $286.17 6.2% 2018 $21.8M21 3.3% $251.03$1,453,111 1666.3% $274.98 6.1% 2017 $42.1M35 8.5% $225.06$2,341,500 1584.0% $262.26 6.1% 2016 $29.6M30 5.9% $196.51$1,611,537 1515.1% $249.92 6.1% 2015 $27.5M24 6.0% $178.51$1,835,167 1394.4% $231.19 6.2% 2014 $18.4M17 3.4% $181.73$1,417,038 1286.5% $211.46 6.4% 2013 $9.6M19 2.8% $151.29$736,048 116- $192.25 6.7%
2012 $14.7M29 6.8% $88.59$862,941 1087.6% $179.20 6.9%
2011 $7.1M13 1.7% $253.78$1,189,208 104- $171.81 7.2%
2010 $7.1M9 5.3% $182.50$1,782,500 958.6% $157.05 7.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Long Beach: Suburban
PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Retail Submarket Report
Los Angeles - CA
RETAIL SUBMARKET REPORT
Submarket Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 5
Construction 6
Sales 9
Sales Past 12 Months 11
Supply & Demand Trends 13
Rent & Vacancy 16
Sale Trends 19
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
42K 42.4K 4.3% -0.2%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth Vacancies for retail properties in Long Beach:
Suburban were under the five-year average during the
fourth quarter, but they were essentially unchanged from this time last year. The rate also comes in below the
region's average. Meanwhile, retail rents have slipped
over the past year, falling by -0.2%.
In terms of development, Long Beach: Suburban has
received an injection of new supply over the past few
years, and the pipeline is still churning during the fourth quarter.
Long Beach: Suburban is a very liquid investment
market, characterized by heavy trading, and the market
proved to be liquid yet again this past year. At $335/SF, market pricing is considerably lower than the region's
average pricing.
The coronavirus' impact on the market may lead to
lasting structural changes within the retail sector. E- commerce has flourished, and spending and shopping
habits may be permanently altered, particularly as brick- and-mortar retailers may be unable to adapt to the
changing environment.
KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$28.7250.9%266,049Malls 50.9% 0 0 0
$35.121.9%1,922,281Power Center 2.9% 0 0 0
$29.215.0%3,486,857Neighborhood Center 7.5% 0 0 0
$27.033.1%1,327,494Strip Center 3.3% 1,000 0 0
$25.512.9%6,214,079General Retail 4.1% (1,600) 0 4,940
--0Other - 0 0 0
$28.104.3%13,216,760Submarket 5.7% (600) 0 4,940
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When
3.9%4.0%0%Vacancy Change (YOY) 5.5% 2021 Q2 2.0% 2006 Q2 44,317(4,385)42.4KNet Absorption SF 282,783 2010 Q4 (235,470) 2009 Q2 35,96130,93942KDeliveries SF 154,230 2006 Q4 0 2015 Q3
2.8%1.2%-0.2%Rent Growth 5.4% 2007 Q2 -5.5% 2009 Q4
N/A$97M$116MSales Volume $232.3M 2020 Q1 $35.2M 2010 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
VACANCY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
AVAILABILITY RATE
4 & 5 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating GLA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 9,4501820-2004 Ximeno Ave
Vons Circle Center 118,658 2 0.8% 2,470
1,462141 E Willow St 22,000 1 13.1% 1,475
1,6491775 Ximeno Ave
PAD 2 6,200 1 30.6% 83
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
3 STAR MOST ACTIVE BUILDINGS IN SUBMARKET - PAST 12 MONTHS Property Name/Address Rating GLA Deals Leased SF 12 Mo Vacancy 12 Mo Net Absorp SF 5,5402115-2131 N Bellflower Blvd 18,000 1 0% 5,058
2,5703377-3395 Long Beach Blvd
Wardlow Plaza 12,361 2 10.3% 2,570
1,716321 E Willow St 4,000 1 0% 1,567
1,4564201-4221 E Willow St 9,121 1 9.6% 1,456
1,0003410-3430 Long Beach Blvd 6,601 1 9.1% 1,000
4,3503578-3599 N Los Coyotes Diag…
Los Coyotes Shopping Center 31,998 1 14.9% 770
6823203 E Anaheim St 682 1 20.0% 682
1,63511421 E Carson St 10,358 1 3.2% 142
9004215-4275 Atlantic Ave 20,740 1 4.3% 78
46420314 Norwalk Blvd 4,160 1 4.5% 40
1,5755555 E Stearns St 34,429 1 0% 0
1,3003000 Cherry Ave 17,395 1 17.3% 0
43,13012120 Carson St
Hawaiian Gardens Towne Ce… 43,130 1 0% 0
3603768 Long Beach Blvd 1,888 2 0% 0
2,9001601-1629 E Pacific Coast 2,900 1 0% 0
8194600-4782 E Pacific Coast Hwy
Circle Marina Center 84,625 1 6.8% (124)
3,5751002-1030 Pacific Coast Hwy 25,148 1 14.2% (1,620) 1,0153400-3500 Los Coyotes Diag 16,863 1 38.1% (1,996)
2,0687621-7679 E Carson St 92,187 1 10.5% (2,068)
3,4408105-8195 E Wardlow Rd
El Dorado Center 82,492 2 11.0% (2,692)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Rent
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
45,160 51,839 4,940 22,463
All-Time Annual Avg. Square Feet Delivered Square Feet Past 8 Qtrs Delivered Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs Proposed Square Feet Next 8 Qtrs PAST 8 QUARTERS DELIVERIES, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, & PROPOSED
PAST & FUTURE DELIVERIES IN SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Construction
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
RECENT DELIVERIES
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner May 20206325 E Spring St 42,000 1 Apr 2021 -
Stuart Kaplan
1 Jul 20192229 N Lakewood Blvd 3,600 2 Sep 2020 -
Jalal Tabatabeian
2 Jan 20195865 E Spring St
The Coffee Bean & Tea L… 1,839 1 Jul 2020 -
Tadashi D. Nakase
3 Jan 20194500 E Atherton St
Raising Cane's 4,400 1 Oct 2019 -
Black Equities Group, LLC
4 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Aug 202012300 E Carson St 2,940 1 Nov 2021 -
Golcheh Developments and Inve…
1 Apr 20202590 N Lakewood Blvd 2,000 1 Nov 2021 -
Ara Tchaghlassian
2 PROPOSED
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner May 2022530 E 33rd St 15,963 1 May 2022 -
John Wallace Russell
1 Oct 20213115 Long Beach Blvd 6,500 1 Jan 2022 -
David J Curry Living Trust
2 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Sales
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
Investors have been especially active in the capital
markets in Long Beach: Suburban, making it one of the
most heavily traded submarkets in the region over the
past several years. Annual sales volume has averaged
$125 million over the past five years, including a 12-
month high of $232 million over that stretch. The
recorded transaction volume here reached $116 million in the past year. General retail drove that volume.
Market pricing, based on the estimated price movement
of all properties in the submarket, sat at $335/SF during the fourth quarter of 2021. That market price is largely unchanged since last year, as values have held steady,
but the price itself still sits far below the overall average for Los Angeles. Market cap rates are within a few basis points of their year-ago levels, at 5.5%, which is pretty similar to the metro.
There is still uncertainty in the capital markets thanks to the coronavirus pandemic. Although investment volume
has held up relatively well, some investors may need to see signs of sustained economic growth before engaging
in the submarket.
SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Sales
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Sales Past 12 Months
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
49 5.4% $190 1.4%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale
SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS
SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $350,000 $2,360,551 $1,000,000 $16,000,000
Price/SF $44 $190 $279 $2,311
Cap Rate 3.9% 5.4% 5.0% 7.3%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.1 6.5 7.1 11.2
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 702 13,006 3,750 177,607
Stories 1 1 1 3
Typical Floor SF 675 10,879 3,588 177,607
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 1.4% 0% 100%
Year Built 1919 1968 1962 2020
Star Rating
2.4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Sales Past 12 Months
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate
RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Ross, Petco, Dollar Tree 2006 56,460 0% $16,000,000 $283 3055-3075 California Ave
3/19/2021 6.1%
-
2 Sears 1996 144,000 0% $11,700,000 $81
2100 N Bellflower Blvd
9/8/2021 -
-
3 1670 W Pacific Coast Hwy 1999 5,758 0% $10,000,000 $1,73712/31/2020 - -
4 CVS 2009 13,452 0% $9,250,000 $688
5505 E Carson St
11/9/2020 4.3%
-
5 2800 Cherry Ave 1992 177,607 0% $7,900,000 $441/5/2021 - -
6 959-999 E Spring St 2015 6,535 0% $6,625,000 $1,0141/5/2021 4.9% -
7 1002-1030 Pacific Coast… 1962 25,148 14.2% $4,400,000 $1758/27/2021 5.4% -
8 The Coffee Bean & Tea L… 2020 1,839 0% $4,250,000 $2,311 5865 E Spring St
3/5/2021 3.9%
-
9 Jack In The Box 2008 2,400 0% $3,315,000 $1,381
801 E Spring St
2/5/2021 4.4%
-
10 2850 Cherry Ave 1992 30,867 0% $2,750,000 $1781/4/2021 - -
10 2850 Cherry Ave 1992 30,867 0% $2,750,000 $1781/4/2021 - -
11 Applebees's 2013 5,500 0% $2,364,000 $430
899 E Spring St
3/18/2021 5.0%
-
12 12112-12122 Centralia Rd 1963 16,500 0% $2,250,000 $13612/22/2020 - -
13 101 W Pacific Coast Hwy 2006 3,481 0% $2,015,000 $5795/20/2021 - -
14 7-Eleven 1945 3,010 0% $1,985,000 $659
1960 Santa Fe Ave
2/1/2021 4.8%
-
15 2023 E 19th St 1940 1,720 0% $1,510,000 $8787/14/2021 - -
16 2185-2189 Pacific Ave 1958 6,612 0% $1,453,000 $2208/21/2021 6.2% -
17 500 E Willow St 1988 4,630 0% $1,425,000 $30812/16/2020 - -
18 311 W Willow St 1971 5,760 0% $1,400,000 $2436/25/2021 - -
19 3722 Atlantic Ave 1948 3,658 0% $1,355,000 $3706/30/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Supply & Demand Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 29,348 0.2% 0.2%26,479 1.113,247,505
2024 24,039 0.2% 0.3%34,115 0.713,218,157
2023 2,256 0% 0.3%41,471 0.113,194,118
2022 (24,199) -0.2% 0.1%14,920 -13,191,862
2021 41,301 0.3% 0.8%109,219 0.413,216,061
YTD 42,000 0.3% 1.0%125,750 0.313,216,760
2020 (43,958) -0.3% -0.6%(75,223) -13,174,760
2019 14,467 0.1% 0.7%94,093 0.213,218,718
2018 (11,622) -0.1% -0.3%(41,681) -13,204,251
2017 21,591 0.2% -0.5%(61,477) -13,215,873
2016 (5,096) 0% -0.5%(69,167) -13,194,282
2015 274,242 2.1% -1.0%(133,307) -13,199,378
2014 7,756 0.1% 1.1%144,003 0.112,925,136
2013 23,994 0.2% 0.3%45,132 0.512,917,380
2012 (20,674) -0.2% -0.3%(34,911) -12,893,386
2011 110,555 0.9% -0.4%(49,305) -12,914,060
2010 20,104 0.2% 2.2%282,783 0.112,803,505
2009 50,304 0.4% -1.2%(148,592) -12,783,401
MALLS SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 2,714 1.0% 1.4%3,706 0.7271,781
2024 2,462 0.9% 2.7%7,135 0.3269,067
2023 1,111 0.4% 4.5%11,985 0.1266,605
2022 (433) -0.2% 0.6%1,724 -265,494
2021 (122) 0% 6.4%17,026 -265,927
YTD 0 0% 7.1%18,900 0266,049
2020 0 0% 8.5%22,628 0266,049
2019 3,867 1.5% 33.2%88,417 0266,049
2018 5,200 2.0% -- -262,182
2017 0 0% -22.8%(58,500) -256,982
2016 0 0% -- -256,982
2015 - - -76.9%(197,682) -256,982
2014 - - -- --
2013 - - -- --
2012 - - -- --
2011 - - -- --
2010 - - -- --
2009 - - -- --
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Supply & Demand Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
POWER CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (2,779) -0.1% -0.1%(2,827) -1,909,077
2024 (2,834) -0.1% -0.1%(1,930) -1,911,856
2023 (3,162) -0.2% 0%(880) -1,914,690
2022 (3,558) -0.2% 0%593 -1,917,852
2021 (871) 0% 6.5%124,220 -1,921,410
YTD 0 0% 6.6%126,963 01,922,281
2020 0 0% -6.3%(121,513) -1,922,281
2019 0 0% -1.2%(23,967) -1,922,281
2018 0 0% -0.5%(10,500) -1,922,281
2017 0 0% 0.9%17,833 01,922,281
2016 0 0% -0.1%(2,500) -1,922,281
2015 0 0% -0.9%(17,833) -1,922,281
2014 0 0% -0.1%(2,026) -1,922,281
2013 0 0% 1.0%18,960 01,922,281
2012 0 0% -0.3%(6,460) -1,922,281
2011 0 0% 0%0 -1,922,281
2010 0 0% 10.3%197,754 01,922,281
2009 0 0% -6.8%(130,128) -1,922,281
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 11,904 0.3% 0.3%9,918 1.23,504,184
2024 10,335 0.3% 0.4%13,465 0.83,492,280
2023 2,780 0.1% 0.5%16,004 0.23,481,945
2022 (6,122) -0.2% 0.1%3,871 -3,479,165
2021 (1,570) 0% -2.2%(76,297) -3,485,287
YTD 0 0% -1.9%(66,282) -3,486,857
2020 0 0% 0.6%21,073 03,486,857
2019 0 0% 0.7%25,588 03,486,857
2018 0 0% 0.2%5,499 03,486,857
2017 0 0% -0.6%(19,225) -3,486,857
2016 0 0% -1.6%(55,793) -3,486,857
2015 6,535 0.2% 2.1%72,205 0.13,486,857
2014 0 0% 0.3%11,406 03,480,322
2013 5,500 0.2% -0.7%(24,528) -3,480,322
2012 0 0% 1.2%40,932 03,474,822
2011 105,198 3.1% 1.7%58,727 1.83,474,822
2010 0 0% -0.6%(19,933) -3,369,624
2009 0 0% -1.4%(46,758) -3,369,624
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Supply & Demand Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
STRIP CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,448 0.1% 0%304 4.81,326,677
2024 1,150 0.1% 0.1%1,029 1.11,325,229
2023 (490) 0% 0.2%2,008 -1,324,079
2022 (2,388) -0.2% 0%310 -1,324,569
2021 (537) 0% 1.7%23,191 -1,326,957
YTD 0 0% 1.9%24,563 01,327,494
2020 0 0% -0.9%(11,466) -1,327,494
2019 0 0% -0.8%(10,049) -1,327,494
2018 0 0% 1.3%17,705 01,327,494
2017 0 0% -1.0%(13,191) -1,327,494
2016 0 0% 1.5%19,410 01,327,494
2015 0 0% 1.1%14,385 01,327,494
2014 14,576 1.1% 4.1%54,090 0.31,327,494
2013 18,494 1.4% 0.5%5,951 3.11,312,918
2012 9,939 0.8% 2.2%28,961 0.31,294,424
2011 2,800 0.2% -3.0%(39,115) -1,284,485
2010 0 0% 1.4%17,763 01,281,685
2009 36,967 3.0% 4.9%63,395 0.61,281,685
GENERAL RETAIL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 16,061 0.3% 0.2%15,378 1.06,235,786
2024 12,926 0.2% 0.2%14,416 0.96,219,725
2023 2,017 0% 0.2%12,354 0.26,206,799
2022 (11,698) -0.2% 0.1%8,422 -6,204,782
2021 44,401 0.7% 0.3%21,079 2.16,216,480
YTD 42,000 0.7% 0.3%21,606 1.96,214,079
2020 (43,958) -0.7% 0.2%14,055 -6,172,079
2019 10,600 0.2% 0.2%14,104 0.86,216,037
2018 (16,822) -0.3% -0.9%(54,385) -6,205,437
2017 21,591 0.3% 0.2%11,606 1.96,222,259
2016 (5,096) -0.1% -0.5%(30,284) -6,200,668
2015 10,725 0.2% -0.1%(4,382) -6,205,764
2014 (6,820) -0.1% 1.3%80,533 -6,195,039
2013 0 0% 0.7%44,749 06,201,859
2012 (30,613) -0.5% -1.6%(98,344) -6,201,859
2011 2,557 0% -1.1%(68,917) -6,232,472
2010 20,104 0.3% 1.4%87,199 0.26,229,915
2009 13,337 0.2% -0.6%(35,101) -6,209,811
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Rent & Vacancy
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 129 2.1% 12.9%$31.94 495,283 3.7% 0%
2024 127 3.2% 10.6%$31.29 494,994 3.7% -0.1%
2023 123 4.6% 7.2%$30.34 506,501 3.8% -0.3%
2022 117 3.1% 2.5%$28.99 544,917 4.1% -0.3%
2021 114 0.4% -0.6%$28.13 581,381 4.4% -0.5%
YTD 114 -0.2% -0.7%$28.10 565,146 4.3% -0.6%
2020 113 -1.0% -1.0%$28.01 648,896 4.9% 0.3%
2019 115 2.1% 0%$28.29 617,631 4.7% -0.6%
2018 112 2.3% -2.1%$27.70 697,257 5.3% 0.2%
2017 110 3.5% -4.3%$27.07 674,996 5.1% 0.6%
2016 106 3.1% -7.5%$26.16 591,928 4.5% 0.5%
2015 103 4.5% -10.3%$25.37 527,857 4.0% 1.1%
2014 98 4.2% -14.2%$24.28 377,290 2.9% -1.1%
2013 94 3.3% -17.6%$23.30 513,537 4.0% -0.2%
2012 91 1.3% -20.2%$22.57 534,675 4.1% 0.1%
2011 90 -0.9% -21.3%$22.27 520,438 4.0% 1.2%
2010 91 -3.7% -20.6%$22.48 360,578 2.8% -2.1%
2009 95 -5.5% -17.5%$23.34 623,257 4.9% 1.5%
MALLS RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 121 -0.6% -0.9%$28.95 118,356 43.5% -0.8%
2024 122 0.4% -0.3%$29.13 119,366 44.4% -2.2%
2023 122 1.7% -0.7%$29.01 124,063 46.5% -4.3%
2022 120 0% -2.4%$28.52 134,953 50.8% -0.7%
2021 120 -0.2% -2.3%$28.53 137,090 51.6% -6.4%
YTD 120 -0.5% -1.7%$28.72 135,304 50.9% -7.1%
2020 120 -2.1% -2.1%$28.59 154,204 58.0% -8.5%
2019 122 2.4% 0%$29.21 176,832 66.5% -33.2%
2018 120 2.7% -2.4%$28.51 261,382 99.7% 0%
2017 116 3.9% -5.0%$27.75 256,182 99.7% 22.8%
2016 112 3.7% -8.6%$26.70 197,682 76.9% 0%
2015 108 5.5% -11.8%$25.75 197,682 76.9% -
2014 102 4.8% -16.4%$24.41 0 - -
2013 98 4.2% -20.2%$23.29 0 - -
2012 94 2.1% -23.4%$22.36 0 - -
2011 92 -0.3% -25.0%$21.90 0 - -
2010 92 -3.6% -24.8%$21.97 0 - -
2009 96 -4.5% -22.0%$22.78 0 - -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Rent & Vacancy
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
POWER CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 136 2.2% 12.4%$40.14 31,223 1.6% 0%
2024 133 3.3% 10.0%$39.28 31,105 1.6% 0%
2023 129 4.8% 6.5%$38.02 31,942 1.7% -0.1%
2022 123 3.2% 1.6%$36.30 34,160 1.8% -0.2%
2021 119 0.6% -1.5%$35.18 38,253 2.0% -6.5%
YTD 119 -0.5% -1.7%$35.12 36,337 1.9% -6.6%
2020 118 -2.1% -2.1%$34.95 163,300 8.5% 6.3%
2019 121 2.4% 0%$35.71 41,787 2.2% 1.2%
2018 118 2.7% -2.3%$34.88 17,820 0.9% 0.5%
2017 115 3.9% -4.9%$33.96 7,320 0.4% -0.9%
2016 111 3.7% -8.4%$32.71 25,153 1.3% 0.1%
2015 107 5.4% -11.7%$31.54 22,653 1.2% 0.9%
2014 101 4.7% -16.2%$29.92 4,820 0.3% 0.1%
2013 97 4.0% -20.0%$28.58 2,794 0.1% -1.0%
2012 93 2.0% -23.0%$27.49 21,754 1.1% 0.3%
2011 91 -0.3% -24.5%$26.95 15,294 0.8% 0%
2010 92 -3.2% -24.3%$27.03 15,294 0.8% -10.3%
2009 95 -5.4% -21.8%$27.93 213,048 11.1% 6.8%
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 130 2.0% 12.8%$33.15 158,482 4.5% 0%
2024 128 3.1% 10.5%$32.49 156,787 4.5% -0.1%
2023 124 4.6% 7.2%$31.51 160,079 4.6% -0.4%
2022 118 3.0% 2.5%$30.13 173,370 5.0% -0.3%
2021 115 0.4% -0.5%$29.24 183,112 5.3% 2.1%
YTD 115 -0.2% -0.6%$29.21 174,553 5.0% 1.9%
2020 114 -0.9% -0.9%$29.12 108,271 3.1% -0.6%
2019 115 2.0% 0%$29.39 129,344 3.7% -0.7%
2018 113 2.4% -2.0%$28.82 154,932 4.4% -0.2%
2017 110 3.6% -4.3%$28.13 160,431 4.6% 0.6%
2016 107 3.5% -7.6%$27.17 141,206 4.0% 1.6%
2015 103 4.7% -10.7%$26.26 85,413 2.4% -1.9%
2014 98 4.1% -14.6%$25.09 151,083 4.3% -0.3%
2013 95 3.2% -18.0%$24.10 162,489 4.7% 0.9%
2012 92 1.4% -20.5%$23.36 132,461 3.8% -1.2%
2011 90 -1.0% -21.6%$23.03 173,393 5.0% 1.2%
2010 91 -3.5% -20.8%$23.27 126,922 3.8% 0.6%
2009 95 -5.3% -17.9%$24.12 106,989 3.2% 1.4%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Rent & Vacancy
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
STRIP CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 123 2.1% 14.2%$30.81 38,663 2.9% 0.1%
2024 121 3.2% 11.8%$30.17 37,820 2.9% 0%
2023 117 4.7% 8.3%$29.22 37,964 2.9% -0.2%
2022 112 3.1% 3.5%$27.91 40,209 3.0% -0.2%
2021 108 0.3% 0.3%$27.07 42,598 3.2% -1.8%
YTD 108 0.1% 0.2%$27.03 41,730 3.1% -1.9%
2020 108 0.3% 0%$26.98 66,293 5.0% 0.9%
2019 108 2.3% -0.3%$26.89 54,827 4.1% 0.8%
2018 105 2.4% -2.6%$26.28 44,778 3.4% -1.3%
2017 103 2.1% -4.9%$25.65 62,483 4.7% 1.0%
2016 101 2.6% -6.8%$25.13 49,292 3.7% -1.5%
2015 98 4.2% -9.2%$24.51 68,702 5.2% -1.1%
2014 94 3.4% -12.8%$23.52 83,087 6.3% -3.1%
2013 91 2.2% -15.6%$22.75 122,601 9.3% 0.8%
2012 89 0.8% -17.4%$22.27 110,058 8.5% -1.5%
2011 88 -1.6% -18.1%$22.10 129,080 10.0% 3.2%
2010 90 -4.4% -16.7%$22.46 87,165 6.8% -1.4%
2009 94 -6.0% -13.0%$23.48 104,928 8.2% -2.4%
GENERAL RETAIL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 128 2.2% 13.5%$29.10 148,559 2.4% 0%
2024 125 3.2% 11.1%$28.49 149,916 2.4% 0%
2023 121 4.7% 7.6%$27.59 152,453 2.5% -0.2%
2022 116 3.2% 2.8%$26.35 162,225 2.6% -0.3%
2021 112 0.4% -0.4%$25.54 180,328 2.9% 0.4%
YTD 112 -0.1% -0.5%$25.51 177,222 2.9% 0.3%
2020 112 -0.8% -0.8%$25.45 156,828 2.5% -0.9%
2019 113 2.1% 0%$25.64 214,841 3.5% -0.1%
2018 110 2.1% -2.0%$25.12 218,345 3.5% 0.5%
2017 108 3.5% -4.0%$24.61 188,580 3.0% 0.2%
2016 105 2.7% -7.3%$23.77 178,595 2.9% 0.4%
2015 102 4.0% -9.7%$23.14 153,407 2.5% 0.2%
2014 98 4.2% -13.3%$22.24 138,300 2.2% -1.4%
2013 94 3.2% -16.8%$21.34 225,653 3.6% -0.7%
2012 91 1.1% -19.4%$20.68 270,402 4.4% 1.1%
2011 90 -1.0% -20.3%$20.44 202,671 3.3% 1.1%
2010 91 -3.8% -19.5%$20.65 131,197 2.1% -1.1%
2009 94 -5.6% -16.3%$21.47 198,292 3.2% 0.8%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Sale Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 184- $381.17 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 181- $375.30 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 176- $364.97 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 167- $347.03 5.5%
2021 -- - -- 162- $336.63 5.5%
YTD $87.7M38 4.1% $161.23$2,306,632 1625.5% $335.30 5.5% 2020 $131.6M48 2.5% $396.36$2,741,906 1605.8% $332.62 5.5% 2019 $171.1M71 4.0% $349.59$3,111,682 1596.0% $331.01 5.5% 2018 $59.7M77 2.5% $279.83$1,357,187 1525.3% $315.53 5.6% 2017 $129.3M139 6.8% $389.49$2,228,486 1475.6% $305.72 5.6% 2016 $110.8M82 3.4% $306.28$2,014,002 1445.7% $298.10 5.6% 2015 $127.8M69 4.1% $282.89$2,661,504 1375.0% $283.81 5.7% 2014 $87.6M78 3.3% $289.43$2,085,062 1236.9% $256.34 6.0% 2013 $66.4M63 2.6% $255.57$1,443,890 1087.6% $223.97 6.4% 2012 $86.4M46 4.1% $205.16$2,469,257 1026.4% $212.45 6.6% 2011 $88.6M58 3.5% $258.07$2,953,283 936.6% $192.79 6.9% 2010 $35.2M32 2.2% $189.08$1,529,603 877.8% $181.55 7.2% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
POWER CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 179- $430.05 5.2%
2024 -- - -- 176- $423.05 5.2%
2023 -- - -- 171- $411.02 5.1%
2022 -- - -- 163- $390.35 5.1%
2021 -- - -- 158- $378.09 5.2%
YTD $11.7M1 7.5% $81.25$11,700,000 157- $376.44 5.2%
2020 -- - -- 156- $374.98 5.2%
2019 -- - -- 157- $376.95 5.2%
2018 -- - -- 149- $357.48 5.3%
2017 -- - -- 145- $348.30 5.3%
2016 -- - -- 141- $339.15 5.3%
2015 -- - -- 135- $323.25 5.3%
2014 -- - -- 123- $294.06 5.6%
2013 $6.5M7 0.7% $453.95$928,333 108- $258.15 6.0%
2012 -- - -- 102- $245.63 6.1%
2011 -- - -- 94- $224.43 6.4%
2010 -- - -- 88- $211.81 6.7%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Sale Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 183- $355.43 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 180- $350.08 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 176- $340.57 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 167- $323.95 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 162- $314.35 5.5%
YTD $28.3M4 2.0% $399.24$7,076,000 1615.1% $313.13 5.5% 2020 $36.2M9 2.7% $387.36$4,019,556 161- $312.27 5.5%
2019 $94.9M5 7.0% $388.95$18,978,200 161- $311.48 5.4%
2018 $3.4M1 0.1% $787.86$3,350,000 151- $292.63 5.6%
2017 $22.4M17 9.6% $385.44$4,470,000 146- $282.57 5.6%
2016 $29.2M1 1.5% $560.03$29,150,000 1444.6% $279.29 5.6% 2015 $52.4M10 6.7% $223.81$5,235,050 136- $263.64 5.7%
2014 $20.2M3 2.3% $257.74$6,729,380 122- $236.27 6.0%
2013 $1.3M1 0% $1,608.60$1,274,012 107- $208.42 6.4%
2012 $56.6M11 7.1% $300.83$5,657,500 1027.0% $198.24 6.5% 2011 $72M13 8.0% $261.80$6,000,000 93- $180.09 6.9%
2010 $16M3 2.3% $205.68$5,348,627 87- $169.27 7.2%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
STRIP CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 180- $416.43 5.6%
2024 -- - -- 177- $409.61 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 172- $397.91 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 163- $377.96 5.5%
2021 -- - -- 158- $366.35 5.5%
YTD $4.4M1 1.9% $174.96$4,400,000 1575.4% $364.82 5.6%
2020 $11M2 1.4% $590.52$5,476,500 1555.1% $358.93 5.6%
2019 $8.8M6 2.1% $322.67$1,466,487 1545.5% $356.18 5.6% 2018 $13.2M6 3.3% $344.88$2,647,664 1495.6% $346.55 5.6% 2017 $22.4M17 7.5% $401.02$2,802,250 1455.6% $337 5.6%
2016 $20.7M10 4.0% $436.71$2,300,759 1415.1% $328.11 5.6% 2015 $24.6M5 3.6% $631.50$6,158,250 1364.6% $315.41 5.7% 2014 $24.5M7 5.0% $370.92$3,500,697 1246.5% $288.47 6.0% 2013 $19.2M9 8.0% $232.97$3,201,667 1087.3% $250.47 6.4% 2012 $7.6M7 2.8% $265.60$1,527,600 1037.0% $238.03 6.5% 2011 $2.5M2 0.7% $268.59$1,230,000 936.7% $216.03 6.9%
2010 -- - -- 88- $203.54 7.1%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Sale Trends
Long Beach: Suburban Retail
GENERAL RETAIL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 188- $369.33 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 185- $363.24 5.6%
2023 -- - -- 180- $352.84 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 171- $335.12 5.6%
2021 -- - -- 165- $324.67 5.6%
YTD $43.2M32 4.9% $142.45$1,351,500 1655.8% $323.30 5.7% 2020 $84.5M37 3.6% $383.81$2,283,311 1636.0% $319.86 5.6% 2019 $67.5M60 4.2% $308.96$1,533,013 1616.0% $316.89 5.7% 2018 $43.1M70 4.6% $252.56$1,134,945 1555.2% $303.67 5.7% 2017 $84.5M105 7.5% $387.60$1,877,426 1505.5% $293.98 5.7% 2016 $60.9M71 5.6% $232.32$1,353,628 1456.1% $284.61 5.8% 2015 $50.8M54 4.1% $284.14$1,493,197 1385.1% $271.66 5.9% 2014 $42.9M68 4.6% $271.08$1,339,988 1256.9% $244.99 6.2% 2013 $39.4M46 3.4% $242.95$1,232,394 1087.7% $212.67 6.6% 2012 $22.2M28 3.8% $108.65$1,110,550 1025.8% $200.98 6.8% 2011 $14.1M43 2.6% $239.11$883,655 936.5% $181.75 7.2%
2010 $19.1M29 3.2% $177.10$956,750 877.8% $171.15 7.4%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Los Angeles - CA
PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Office Market Report
OFFICE MARKET REPORT
Market Key Statistics 1
Leasing 2
Rent 6
Construction 9
Under Construction Properties 11
Sales 13
Sales Past 12 Months 15
Economy 17
Market Submarkets 22
Supply & Demand Trends 29
Rent & Vacancy 31
Sale Trends 33
Los Angeles Office
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview
Los Angeles Office
3M (6.6M) 13.7% 0%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Los Angeles office market continues to see
conditions deteriorate. Vacancies continue to rise at a rapid clip, and sublease space continues to be at record levels. Rental rates are down from a peak in 20Q1, and
while rates have held flat in 2021, concessions and other incentives have been more generous for tenants than
prior to the pandemic based on notable leases recently
signed.
Pre-pandemic, tech and entertainment firms were key
drivers of leasing demand during the past several years.
Many tech firms are now facing pains, as blocks of
sublease space put on the market last year by this cohort of tenants in Silicon Beach suggests all is not well for the sector. The entertainment industry also supported robust demand, with major studios and the digital upstarts in the midst of a content production arms race. While overall
tenant activity will likely be subdued for at least the near term, there is some life in the leasing market as there have been several large leases signed in recent months
by some of L.A.'s more dynamic, innovative tenants.
The Los Angeles office market is unique among major
markets nationally for the decentralized nature of its
office stock. This is a product of the sprawling nature of the metropolis as well as its well-earned reputation for having some of the nation's worst traffic. Companies
need to be strategic in where they locate. The most
prestigious office locations have long been on the
Westside. Addresses in submarkets such as Century
City, Beverly Hills, and Brentwood evoke a certain cachet and typically attract more traditional and image-
conscious tenants. Heading west from those submarkets
takes one to Silicon Beach, Los Angeles' tech epicenter, which includes Santa Monica, Venice, Marina Del Rey,
and Playa Vista.
Current office construction levels in L.A. have come
down from recent peaks, but activity remains high from a historical perspective. Projects with little preleasing may be hard-pressed to secure tenants in the current leasing environment.
Office sales volume in L.A. in recent quarters has been below activity seen in the years leading up to the
pandemic. Some investors have taken a wait-and-see
approach since the onset of the pandemic. Average
market pricing peaked at the beginning of 2020, and
there has been little movement since. Several recent
large transactions of higher-quality assets garnered
strong pricing and suggest discounts may not become
the norm for all office sales in L.A. post-pandemic.
Looking ahead, it's uncertain to what extent pricing could be impacted longer term. Some are debating how office
tenants will utilize space in the future.
KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$47.5718.9%169,248,6124 & 5 Star 23.7% (175,982) 0 5,748,299 $39.0212.1%155,685,7443 Star 15.1% (210,818) 0 432,665
$33.927.6%105,306,3631 & 2 Star 9.5% (78,779) 0 10,135
$41.2213.7%430,240,719Market 17.2% (465,579) 0 6,191,099 Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When
14.2%10.7%2.1%Vacancy Change (YOY) 13.7% 2021 Q4 6.8% 2007 Q3 13,249948,711(6.6M)Net Absorption SF 12,910,310 2000 Q1 (9,819,352) 2021 Q1 1,814,6112,366,9203MDeliveries SF 4,462,310 2002 Q3 628,148 1997 Q1
2.5%3.3%0%Rent Growth 14.9% 2007 Q3 -11.0% 2009 Q3
N/A$5.2B$4.3BSales Volume $11.5B 2017 Q3 $762.6M 2009 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Leasing
Los Angeles Office
Negative net absorption persists in Los Angeles' office market. Occupancies have not seen this pace of erosion
in over a decade. Market vacancy currently stands at
13.7%, the highest level seen in CoStar's data set that goes back to 1996.
One major concern is the record levels of available
sublease space in the market. While it appears levels
peaked in 21Q1, the square footage available, 9.7 million SF as of early October, is down only by 450,000 SF and
remains at record levels. There is still over 4 million more SF of sublease space than was being marketed before
the onset of the pandemic. Availabilities are especially elevated in Westside submarkets.
Although market fundamentals continue to erode, there
have been several notable leases recently inked. Deals
between WeWork and Alo Yoga in Beverly Hills and
WeWork and FabFitFun in West Hollywood stand out.
Alo Yoga took 73,000 SF at 9830 Wilshire, and
FabFitFun 53,000 SF at the Pacific Design Center,
Green Building during 21Q3. The two leases executed
with WeWork are prime examples of firms utilizing flex
space options during the pandemic. Whether it is to
avoid longer-term lease commitments or to secure
highly amenitized space to appeal to today's workers,
some companies see the value proposition of flex space
during uncertain times.
Santa Monica has seen several major deals executed in
recent months. In June, streaming giant Hulu renewed
and expanded its offices by 90,000 SF, or 35%, at the
Colorado Center. Hulu now controls 350,000 SF at the
complex, and its lease term now runs through 2028. Also that month, Snap, the parent company of app Snapchat,
expanded its footprint by 145,000 SF, or almost 50%, at the Santa Monica Business Park. Snap is the largest
tenant in the complex and will now occupy almost
450,000 SF. In April, streaming firm Roku signed a 10-
year, 72,000-SF lease at the Colorado Center.
Looking ahead, market vacancy is forecast to continue to expand through next year. Recent leasing activity
remains below pre-pandemic levels, and the market
does have several million SF that will deliver in the
coming quarters that have significant space availabilities.
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing
Los Angeles Office
VACANCY RATE
AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing
Los Angeles Office
12 MONTH NET ABSORPTION SF IN SELECTED BUILDINGS
3rd Qtr
Building Name/Address Submarket Bldg SF Vacant SF
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 4th Qtr 12 Month
Net Absorption SF
Inglewood/South LA 450,872 161,887 0 9 288,976 0 288,985Hollywood Park El Segundo 281,110 0 0 281,110 0 0 281,110888 North Douglas Culver City 241,205 0 0 241,205 0 0 241,205Ivy Station
Santa Clarita Valley 170,000 0 0 170,000 0 0 170,00027918 Franklin Pky Downtown Los Angeles 160,000 0 160,000 0 0 0 160,000LA3 Burbank 351,300 0 0 0 149,937 0 149,937Burbank Empire Center 190th Street Corridor 241,866 12,388 131,006 0 0 0 131,006Hamilton Place Culver City 128,000 0 128,000 0 0 0 128,0008777 Washington Downtown Los Angeles 145,000 0 0 0 0 0 120,521The Exchange Downtown Los Angeles 1,154,306 7,123 0 (7,123) 0 0 118,899Wells Fargo Center - South Tower Miracle Mile 462,375 123,094 0 (94,728) 201,452 0 106,724Wilshire Courtyard Culver City 94,082 0 0 94,082 0 0 94,082Exposition 3
El Segundo 92,373 0 0 0 92,373 0 92,3732221 Park Pl
Eastern SGV 287,930 0 91,374 0 0 0 91,374San Gabriel Valley Corporate C… El Segundo 259,106 80,615 10,869 (173) 0 0 90,856555 S Aviation Blvd Marina Del Rey/Venice 296,737 3,100 0 84,616 0 0 84,616The Brickyard Marina Del Rey/Venice 182,955 93,166 0 0 0 0 81,981Water's Edge 4,999,217 481,373 521,249 768,998 732,738 0 2,431,669Subtotal Primary Competitors 425,241,502 58,389,798 (2,869,085) (1,796,831) (1,532,164) (465,579) (9,048,368)Remaining Los Angeles Market 430,240,719 58,871,171 (2,347,836) (1,027,833) (799,426) (465,579) (6,616,699)Total Los Angeles Market 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Leasing
Los Angeles Office
TOP OFFICE LEASES PAST 12 MONTHS
Building Name/Address Submarket Leased SF Tenant Name Tenant Rep Company Leasing Rep CompanyQtr Century Park * Century City 302,911 Creative Artists Agency Cresa CBREQ2 21 888 North Douglas El Segundo 281,110 Beyond Meat Inc. JLL CBRE;Newmark Knight…Q1 21 Colorado Center * Santa Monica 185,787 Hulu - LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 400 S Hope St * Downtown Los Angeles 159,768 O'Melveny & Myers LLP CBRE CBREQ4 20 Colorado Center * Santa Monica 158,649 Hulu - LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 Shoreline Square Tower * Long Beach: Downtown 151,238 US Customs & Border Pro… Cushman & Wakefield CBREQ1 21 Santa Monica Business Park Santa Monica 145,060 Snap, Inc. - CBREQ2 21 Apollo at Rosecrans * El Segundo 137,000 Fabletics, Inc. Madison Partners CBREQ3 21 Hamilton Place 190th Street Corridor 124,285 County of Los Angeles - Newmark Knight FrankQ1 21 California Plaza * Downtown Los Angeles 120,000 Skadden - JLLQ2 21 City National Plaza * Downtown Los Angeles 109,120 Jones Day - CommonWealth Partne…Q1 21 888 North Douglas El Segundo 107,878 L'Oréal USA - CBRE;Newmark Knight…Q2 21 Pen Factory Santa Monica 87,822 GoodRx - CBREQ2 21
5454 Beethoven St Marina Del Rey/Venice 87,526 Activision Publishing, Inc. Savills CBREQ3 21 Pasadena Business Center Pasadena 83,083 Xencor JLL CBREQ2 21 The Brick and The Machine Culver City 82,553 Apple, Inc. - CBREQ3 21 The Reserve * Marina Del Rey/Venice 79,461 Sony Pictures Entertainment - JLLQ2 21 9830 Wilshire Blvd Beverly Hills 73,000 Alo LLC - WeWorkQ3 21 Colorado Center Santa Monica 72,019 Roku, Inc. Colliers International LA Realty PartnersQ2 21 Sunset Las Palmas Studios Hollywood 70,285 Company 3 Newmark CBREQ1 21 555 S Aviation Blvd El Segundo 65,442 Belkin International CBRE Tishman SpeyerQ1 21 The Platform Culver City 60,875 Technicolor - CresaQ3 21 Santa Monica Business Park Santa Monica 60,656 Snap, Inc - CBREQ4 20 The Platform Culver City 60,000 Scopely CBRE Runyon GroupQ2 21 Del Rey Marina Del Rey/Venice 58,034 Electronic Arts, Inc. - CBREQ4 20 1360 E 6th St Downtown Los Angeles 57,000 DC Stages and Sets - CBREQ1 21 Pacific Design Center West Hollywood 53,427 FabFitFun CBRE Cushman & WakefieldQ3 21 Conjunctive Points Culver City 52,065 - - First Property Realty C…Q3 21 Playa Jefferson * Marina Del Rey/Venice 49,187 Facebook - -Q1 21 Atria West Westwood 48,151 Agency for the Performing… JLL Cushman & WakefieldQ3 21 Headquarters Bldg * Western SGV 47,852 Xencor - -Q4 20
The Plant * East San Ferndo Vlly 47,165 Lenny & Larry's Inc - NAI CapitalQ2 21 Pasadena Business Center Pasadena 46,640 Xencor JLL CBREQ2 21 ROW DTLA / 767 S Alameda Downtown Los Angeles 46,589 Ghost Management Group - -Q4 20 8501 Washington Blvd Culver City 44,899 Anonymous Content - Industry PartnersQ3 21 Century Park Century City 42,876 Kayne Anderson Rudnick JLL SavillsQ3 21 Pasadena Tech Center * Pasadena 42,757 Cogent Communications Avison Young CBREQ4 20 Continental Grand * El Segundo 42,714 Regus - JLLQ2 21
Media Studios Burbank 40,675 - - CBREQ2 21
City National Plaza Downtown Los Angeles 40,140 Clark Hill - CommonWealth Partne…Q2 21 Renewal
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Rent
Los Angeles Office
2021 has seen office asking rates in the L.A. metro hold by and large flat. Landlords are budging little on asking rates, which demonstrates relative confidence that better tenant demand will soon resurface. However, based on
several recent notable leases, concessions and other
lease terms have become more generous for tenants
than prior to the pandemic.
Average office asking rates in Los Angeles stand at
$41.00/SF. Rents in the metro declined modestly last
year. The L.A. office market saw rents increase by 50%
from 2011 through early 2020. L.A. outpaced the nation
during this time, which saw cumulative gains under 40%.
Rent growth in L.A. got as high as 8.5% in early 2016
and witnessed annual gains above inflation through
2019.
Most submarkets on the Westside, including Brentwood,
the Olympic Corridor, and Santa Monica, have been
more adversely impacted since the onset of the
pandemic. Contributing factors leading to relative
underperformance are likely that these locations have
some of the more expensive office space in the L.A.
metro and have seen sublease space rise considerably
since the onset of the pandemic. Conversely, submarkets that offer relative value, like Torrance and Miracle Mile, have fared better during this period.
Given the current weak leasing environment and still
record levels of available sublease space, which is
typically offered at a discount, in L.A., it will be difficult for landlords to significantly push rental rates for at least the near term.
MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Rent
Los Angeles Office
MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
4 & 5 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.64 $1.16$0.82 $5.20 $7.78 $16.60
Antelope Valley $1.28 $0.88$0.60 $3.03 $5.42 $11.21
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.67 $1.12$1.08 $4.96 $5.90 $14.73 Downtown Los Angeles $1.94 $0.74$1.03 $4.56 $12.52 $20.79 Mid-Cities $1.06 $0.57$0.70 $3.34 $6.47 $12.14
Mid-Wilshire $1.74 $1.03$0.66 $5.19 $8.50 $17.12
San Fernando Valley $1.46 $1.04$0.77 $4.46 $6.11 $13.84 San Gabriel Valley $1.73 $0.99$0.86 $3.87 $5.15 $12.60
Santa Clarita Valley $1.42 $0.84$0.80 $4.30 $4.51 $11.87 South Bay $1.38 $0.95$0.66 $5.42 $6.58 $14.99
Southeast Los Angeles $1.87 $1.01$0.76 $2.86 $6.12 $12.62 West Los Angeles $1.72 $1.66$0.79 $6.26 $8.64 $19.07
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Rent
Los Angeles Office
3 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.35 $0.61$0.69 $4.23 $4.29 $11.17
Antelope Valley $0.94 $0.72$0.55 $3 $3 $8.21
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.47 $0.57$0.75 $3.69 $4.47 $10.95 Downtown Los Angeles $1.84 $0.61$0.96 $2.78 $8.28 $14.47 Mid-Cities $0.82 $0.43$0.56 $3.64 $3.07 $8.52
Mid-Wilshire $1.62 $0.69$0.63 $4.37 $4.71 $12.02
NE LA County Outlying $1.34 $0.67$0.69 $1.42 $4.58 $8.70 NW LA County Outlying $1 $0.75$0.57 $3.14 $3.15 $8.61
San Fernando Valley $1.10 $0.79$0.65 $3.73 $3.71 $9.98
San Gabriel Valley $1.65 $0.58$0.79 $3.79 $2.72 $9.53
Santa Clarita Valley $0.82 $0.52$0.63 $4.24 $2.32 $8.53 South Bay $1.24 $0.39$0.60 $4.11 $4.42 $10.76
Southeast Los Angeles $1.58 $0.44$0.67 $3.33 $3.58 $9.60 West Los Angeles $1.32 $0.72$0.71 $6.12 $5.51 $14.38
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 1 & 2 STAR EXPENSES PER SF (ANNUAL)
Utilities Cleaning InsuranceMarket / Cluster Taxes Other Total Los Angeles $1.03 $0.42$0.62 $3.87 $2.36 $8.30
Antelope Valley $0.75 $0.18$0.54 $2.54 $2.56 $6.57
Burbank/Glendale/Pasadena $1.24 $0.49$0.71 $3.68 $2.16 $8.28 Downtown Los Angeles $0.81 $0.39$0.57 $2.84 $5.86 $10.47 East LA County Outlying $1.16 $0.45$0.70 $1.58 $2.04 $5.93 Mid-Cities $0.73 $0.29$0.52 $3.11 $2.94 $7.59
Mid-Wilshire $1.25 $0.56$0.57 $4.50 $2.73 $9.61
NE LA County Outlying $1.30 $0.53$0.76 $1.02 $1.87 $5.48 San Fernando Valley $0.89 $0.43$0.57 $3.69 $1.61 $7.19
San Gabriel Valley $1.15 $0.44$0.73 $3.52 $1.78 $7.62
Santa Clarita Valley $0.74 $0.35$0.63 $4.73 $2.22 $8.67 South Bay $0.86 $0.19$0.57 $3.59 $2.16 $7.37
Southeast Los Angeles $0.73 $0.21$0.60 $2.76 $2.90 $7.20 West Los Angeles $1.15 $0.57$0.60 $5.19 $2.77 $10.28
Expenses are estimated using NCREIF, Trepp, IREM, and CoStar data using the narrowest possible geographical definition from Zip Code to region. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Construction
Los Angeles Office
Looking at recent deliveries, in Inglewood, the 450,000- SF NFL Media Building recently delivered in 21Q2. NFL
inked a deal for half the space in the building in early 2018 and announced that it would move its headquarters
from Culver City. Developers of the NFL Media Building, Wilson Meany, still need to lease almost 50% of the
building to reach full occupancy. The building is a
pioneering location for top-tier office product in L.A. and has yet to become a proven location in terms of seeing
sustained leasing from higher-profile tenants.
Also that quarter, 280,000 SF of Hackman Capital
Partners' 888 North Douglas campus redevelopment in
El Segundo delivered. Beyond Meat occupies this portion of the 30-acre complex that was once home to Northrop
Grumman. There is another 108,000 SF under
construction in the campus that's fully preleased by
L'Oreal that will soon deliver.
There is 6.2 million SF of office space under construction in Greater Los Angeles, down from a recent high of over 8 million SF in 20Q3 but still elevated relative to activity during the past two decades. Burbank and West Los
Angeles stand out for having some of the largest projects underway.
In Burbank, in 2019, Warner Brothers announced it
would be moving into a new $1 billion, Frank Gehry-
designed headquarters on the Burbank Studios lot. Work
commenced in early 2020 on the firm's 800,000-SF two-
tower campus. Work is expected to wrap up in 2023.
Once completed, Warner Brothers will purchase the
campus.
West Los Angeles had seen little in the way of new office stock during the past 20 years. However, the lull in
construction changed dramatically with the renovation of the former Westside Pavilion Mall into creative office
space. In early 2019, Google announced that it would
take almost 600,000 SF in the project. Hackman Capital
Partners commenced work on the conversion toward the
end of 2019, and completion is anticipated for 2022.
Additionally, the former Macy's department store at the site is under renovation and, when completed, will add
230,000 SF of office space. Completion is expected in
the coming months.
DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Construction
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET CONSTRUCTION
Average Building Size
RankUnder Constr
Under Construction Inventory
All ExistingSF (000) Pre-Leased SF (000)SubmarketNo. RankBldgs Pre-Leased % 1 Burbank 15 1,038 69,17577.1% 4 23,286800 9
2 West Los Angeles 2 813 406,60471.8% 5 10,086584 2
3 Olympic Corridor 3 811 270,4042.9% 8 29,85723 3
4 Culver City 10 690 69,02531.9% 7 19,671220 10
5 Downtown Los Angeles 4 483 120,75054.3% 6 152,151262 5 6 Koreatown 1 468 468,000100% 1 39,700468 1
7 Hollywood 3 359 119,604100% 1 26,004359 6
8 Marina Del Rey/Venice 2 319 159,4251.2% 9 22,5654 4
9 Pasadena 2 220 110,0991.0% 10 20,1902 7
10 El Segundo 2 174 86,93981.0% 3 68,780141 8
All Other 22 816 37,09471.6% 19,556584
Totals 66 6,191 93,80555.7% 24,5193,448
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Under Construction Properties
Los Angeles Office
66 6,191,099 1.4% 55.7%
Properties Square Feet Percent of Inventory Preleased
UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Nov 201910800-10900 W Pico Blvd
One Westside 584,000 5 Apr 2022 Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
The Macerich Company
1 Feb 202011355-11377 W Olympic…
LUMEN West LA 553,475 10 Jan 2022 McCarthy Cook & Co.
Northwood Investors LLC
2 Oct 2018510-550 S Vermont Ave
LA County Department… 468,000 20 Nov 2021 Trammell Crow Company County of Los Angeles
3 Sep 20203000 W Alameda Ave
Second Century Expansi… 445,000 9 Jan 2023 Worthe Real Estate Group Worthe Real Estate Group
4 Sep 20203000 W Alameda Ave
Second Century Expansi… 355,000 7 Jan 2023 Worthe Real Estate Group Worthe Real Estate Group
5 Nov 20196181 Centinela Ave
Entrada 315,000 6 Nov 2021 Lincoln Property Company
Lincoln Property Company
6 Jan 201910730 W Pico Blvd
West End 229,208 3 Nov 2021 Goldstein Planting Investments Goldstein Planting Investments
7 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Under Construction Properties
Los Angeles Office
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Jul 202012101 W Olympic Blvd
West Edge 223,062 8 Aug 2022 Hines
Hines
8 Jun 201910 W Walnut St
10 West 217,976 5 Nov 2021 Lincoln Property Company
Lincoln Property Company
9 Jan 20181355 Vine St
Academy South 183,129 5 Nov 2021 Kilroy Realty Corporation Kilroy Realty Corporation
10 Sep 20185790 W Jefferson Blvd
(W)rapper 180,550 16 Jun 2022 -
Samitaur Constructs
11 Jan 20181375 Vine St
Academy North 159,236 6 Nov 2021 Kilroy Realty Corporation Kilroy Realty Corporation
12 Apr 2019700 S Main St
7Main 138,000 4 Nov 2021 Urban Offerings
GEM Realty Capital, Inc.
13 Feb 2021843 N Spring St 127,000 5 Aug 2022 Redcar Properties LTD Redcar Properties LTD
14 Oct 20192130 Violet St 113,000 10 Jan 2022 Lowe Enterprises, Inc.
The Related Companies
15 Jun 2019888 N Douglas St 107,878 1 Jan 2022 Hackman Capital Partners Hackman Capital Partners
16 Aug 20213609 S 10th Ave 107,199 3 Sep 2022 -
The Luzzatto Company
17 Jan 2020520 Mateo St 105,000 6 Nov 2022 Carmel Partners Carmel Partners
18 May 20212901 Pacific Coast Hwy 100,000 2 May 2022 -
-
19 Oct 20203443 Long Beach Blvd
Laserfiche 100,000 4 Nov 2021 Urbana Development
Laserfiche®
20 Mar 20181041 N Formosa Ave
Courtyard at The Lot 97,742 6 Nov 2021 -
CIM Group, LP
21 Apr 20212922 Crenshaw Blvd 89,056 3 Dec 2022 -
CIM Group, LP
22 Jan 20209735 Washington Blvd
The Brick and The Machi… 82,553 4 Jan 2022 Clarett West Development DLJ Real Estate Capital Partners
23 Mar 20215950 W Jefferson Blvd 80,300 4 Apr 2022 -
Richard Hirsch
24 Jun 201918422 Oxnard St
Building 6 77,591 3 Nov 2021 Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC
25 Jun 20188888 Washington Blvd
The Platform - Phase III 67,837 4 Dec 2021 Runyon Group Runyon Group
26 Sep 20193200 N Sepulveda Blvd 66,000 2 Nov 2021 DWS
DWS
27 Apr 20169133 Garvey Ave
Garvey Media Center 62,000 5 Dec 2021 Asia-Pacific California Inc Asia-Pacific California Inc
28 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Sales
Los Angeles Office
Office transaction volume in Los Angeles during the past 12 months, $4.2 billion, was well below the market's 10- year annual average of $7.2 billion. The pandemic has
had an impact on office sales activity. However, despite slow activity and questions around the future of the office sector, recent sales show some investors are still willing to make significant bets in the sector.
This August, in Pasadena, a private investor purchased a three-building portfolio for $80 million ($355/SF). 2 N Lake Ave., a 200,000-SF office property, was the largest property in the transaction. The sale also included a
20,000-SF building at 911 E Colorado Blvd., a one-
story, 1,300-SF retail building, as well as a six-story parking garage. The properties were 63% leased at the
time of sale. Given the occupancy of the portfolio, the sale demonstrates an investor willing to take on leasing risk in the middle of the pandemic.
In July, Hyundai Motor Company acquired from Cardinal
Real Estate Investors 2221 Park Place, a 90,000-SF
property, for $70 million ($760/SF). The property was
originally a 58,000-SF office property that Cardinal
renovated and expanded. Work wrapped up on the
redevelopment in early 2021. Cardinal acquired the
property in 2019 for $31 million. WeWork had preleased
the entire property during renovations but backed out of the lease in 2020. Hyundai purchased the building to
occupy for its operations.
Office properties oriented toward the entertainment
industry have been in high demand over the past year. In July, New York-based Prospect Ridge Advisors acquired
from UBS Realty Investors two assets at the Burbank
Empire Center Complex, 2350 Empire Ave. and 2400
Empire Ave. Prospect purchased the properties,
comprising 234,000 SF, for $106.7 million ($455/SF).
The buildings were 100% leased at the time of sale. UBS acquired the assets back in 2015 from CBRE Global
Investors for $80.4 million ($345/SF).
Thinking further ahead, there could be structural changes to office demand that could impact office values in the metro. The great work-from-home experiment of the
past year has already led some office users to rethink
their office needs as those firms allow more employees
to work remotely or have flexible schedules. If there is a secular decline in office use, this would negatively impact pricing in Los Angeles as well as the nation.
SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Sales
Los Angeles Office
MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Sales Past 12 Months
Los Angeles Office
688 5.3% $426 11.1%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale
SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS
SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $45,000 $7,348,900 $2,250,000 $196,000,000
Price/SF $1.07 $426 $394 $3,401
Cap Rate 1.7% 5.3% 5.3% 12.1%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.0 5.4 4.9 12.0
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 621 17,546 5,916 388,126
Stories 1 2 2 22
Typical Floor SF 1 7,846 4,115 120,452
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 11.1% 0% 100%
Year Built 1900 1965 1962 2021
Star Rating
2.3 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Sales Past 12 Months
Los Angeles Office
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate
RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 NineFifteen 1980 388,126 7.3% $196,000,000 $505
915 Wilshire Blvd
12/17/2020 -
-
2 9050 Washington Blvd 1996 130,356 0% $119,784,587 $9191/26/2021 - -
3 West Building 2015 139,305 9.0% $98,466,087 $707
6555 Barton Ave
12/14/2020 -
-
4 5250 Lankershim Blvd 2009 179,741 23.2% $92,000,000 $5128/26/2021 - -
5 East Bldg 2015 122,161 8.5% $87,533,913 $717
959 Seward St
12/14/2020 -
-
6 Beverly Hills Medical Plaza 1989 67,510 9.3% $81,500,000 $1,207 150 N Robertson Blvd
10/8/2021 -
-
7 Building 230, 233,234 1966 238,795 0% $80,249,810 $336 3100 W Lomita Blvd
8/23/2021 5.5%
-
8 The Park Calabasas 1986 222,524 7.6% $79,000,000 $355 4500 Park Granada
4/1/2021 6.5%
-
9 Building D 1946 37,484 0% $78,855,708 $2,104
2043 Colorado Ave
10/23/2020 -
-
10 Archway Medical Plaza 1958 50,730 9.1% $74,400,000 $1,467 9033 Wilshire Blvd
3/19/2021 4.6%
-
11 Bldg 232 1966 252,372 4.1% $74,244,108 $294
3121 Skypark Dr
8/23/2021 5.5%
-
12 Pasadena Business Center 1956 240,904 23.9% $72,500,000 $301 465 N Halstead St
6/30/2021 -
-
13 2 N Lake Ave 1985 203,911 43.7% $70,997,707 $3488/18/2021 - -
14 2221 Park Pl 2021 92,373 0% $70,000,000 $7587/28/2021 - -
15 Westwood Atrium 1985 107,484 0% $65,000,000 $605
1440 S Sepulveda Blvd
10/1/2021 -
-
16 The Switchyard 2019 106,004 100% $64,257,688 $606
500 S Santa Fe Ave
5/20/2021 -
-
17 2400 Empire Ave 2002 134,784 0% $63,975,022 $4757/2/2021 - -
18 THE LINK 1981 124,785 33.7% $61,500,000 $493
2901 W Alameda Ave
5/25/2021 4.7%
-
19 Pacific Gateway 1982 237,145 14.6% $55,500,000 $234
19191 S Vermont Ave
10/13/2020 5.9%
-
20 601 N Nash St 1954 52,000 0% $52,000,000 $1,0007/30/2021 - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Economy
Los Angeles Office
The Los Angeles economy is recovering slowly from the
pandemic, a trend that followed the Great Recession
when the local economy was slower to recover than
other areas. The metro unemployment rate, after seeing
a sustained improvement for months in the second half
of last year, has plateaued above 10%. New coronavirus
cases, as well as deaths, have temporarily spiked due to variants, but schools reopened and restrictions have
eased.
Los Angeles' position as the entertainment capital of the world and the increased demand for video streaming and
social media had been a boon to the L.A. economy
during the past several years. The pandemic accelerated demand for streaming services, although studios have
targeted theater only releases for 2022, assuming
widespread adoption of vaccinations. The entertainment
business directly or indirectly employs one out of five workers in L.A. County. Content creators have banked
studio space and made investments focused on the
future of the industry. Warner Bros. is currently under construction on its 800,000 SF Second Century
expansion in Burbank. Studio space is at a premium in
the Hollywood, Burbank, and Glendale neighborhoods,
and warehouses in neighboring areas are taking
advantage of that demand with creative industrial
conversions.
Tourism is important for the local economy and the
impact to this sector and its employees has been
considerable. Before the pandemic, over 500,000 people
in the county were employed in the leisure and
hospitality industry. The city had more than 50 million visitors in 2019, but the pandemic severely impacted
travel. Stores, restaurants, and lodging in tourist hotspots like Downtown L.A., Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Santa Monica have been particularly impacted. However, the
market is set for a major rebound as large events such
as the 2022 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics spur the
hospitality and retail sectors.
The industrial sector has sustained growth through the
pandemic as warehousing demands increased by
ecommerce retail operations. A backup at the ports has
led to a record number of ships waiting to unload cargo.
Continued bottlenecks, however, could soon become a
headwind for LA's industrial market if conditions at the ports don't improve. The need for warehousing space
and limited land has led to developers targeting infill development sites that can be scraped for modern
warehouse construction. The overall Southern California industrial market, which includes the five county area of Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside and
Orange Counties recently surpassed 2 billion SF of
industrial inventory.
As more of a structural issue that needs to be addressed long term, the prohibitive cost of housing in L.A. is a major impediment to hiring and is often cited as a
motivating factor for companies to relocate to other parts of the country. Recent departures include construction
giant AECOM. However, the aerospace industry is strong
and major employers such as SpaceX, Rocket Lab and
Relativity Space help sustain the diverse Los Angeles
economy.
Despite near-term issues related to the pandemic, the
metro economy possesses many positive attributes. It
has two major talent generators in USC and UCLA along
with top tier universities such as Cal Tech that support a growing tech economy. It is perennially among the top
five metros in the country for venture capital investment.
The metro is an attractive location for immigrants and
educated talent. More people making six-figure
paychecks continue to move to L.A. than are leaving.
Education levels, while below the national average,
improve every year.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Economy
Los Angeles Office
LOS ANGELES EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN THOUSANDS
Industry Jobs LQ MarketUS USMarketUSMarket
CURRENT JOBS CURRENT GROWTH 10 YR HISTORICAL 5 YR FORECAST -0.16%-0.46%0.75%-1.58%4.89%2.74%0.9319Manufacturing
0.25%0.69%1.00%0.90%4.55%7.36%1.0831Trade, Transportation and Utilities
0.22%0.72%0.49%0.16%3.56%6.87%0.9405 Retail Trade
0.52%0.49%1.46%0.53%2.47%4.21%0.9222Financial Activities
0.82%1.11%-0.11%-0.14%-0.10%-0.26%0.9546Government
0.56%0.69%2.65%3.78%5.68%7.21%0.7158Natural Resources, Mining and Construction
1.14%1.37%1.84%2.59%6.02%6.29%1.2870Education and Health Services
1.09%1.10%2.03%1.46%6.99%7.92%1.0620Professional and Business Services
1.64%3.29%0.56%0.12%7.33%13.44%2.3193Information
2.55%4.74%1.19%1.42%15.31%21.08%1.0458Leisure and Hospitality
0.76%2.77%0.56%-0.28%5.40%9.66%0.8137Other Services
Total Employment 4,354 1.0 7.27% 5.46% 0.99% 1.18% 1.48% 0.89% Source: Oxford Economics
LQ = Location Quotient
Source: Oxford Economics
JOB GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Economy
Los Angeles Office
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%)
NET EMPLOYMENT CHANGE (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Economy
Los Angeles Office
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
POPULATION GROWTH (YOY %)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Economy
Los Angeles Office
NET POPULATION CHANGE (YOY)
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
12 Month ChangeCurrent Level
Metro USMetro USDemographic Category
10 Year Change
Metro US Metro US
5 Year Forecast
Population 330,367,5009,903,349 -0.4% 0.2% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.5% Households 123,394,6093,288,566 -0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0.4% Median Household Income $74,364$83,172 6.1% 6.0% 4.8% 4.0% 2.9% 2.5% Labor Force 162,784,4695,037,628 2.9% 1.5% 0.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% Unemployment 5.8%10.0% -5.6% -2.9% -0.2% -0.3% - -
Source: Oxford Economics
POPULATION GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics
LABOR FORCE GROWTH
INCOME GROWTH
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
LOS ANGELES SUBMARKETS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 23 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 1 190th Street Corridor 5,175 1.2% 29 0 - - -74 0 0 0% - 2 Antelope Valley 4,484 1.0% 31 1 40 0.9% 20396 1 10 0.2% 18 3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 6,143 1.4% 26 1 100 1.6% 12514 0 0 0% - 4 Beverly Hills 11,313 2.6% 12 1 50 0.4% 18314 0 0 0% - 5 Brentwood 4,212 1.0% 35 0 - - -60 0 0 0% -
6 Burbank 15,066 3.5% 8 15 1,038 6.9% 1647 1 4 0% 20
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 7,243 1.7% 24 0 - - -211 0 0 0% - 8 Catalina Island - 0% - 0 - - -- 0 0 - -
9 Century City 11,455 2.7% 11 0 - - -43 0 0 0% -
10 Culver City 9,757 2.3% 18 10 690 7.1% 4496 7 526 5.4% 1 11 Downtown Los Angeles 68,924 16.0% 1 4 483 0.7% 5453 2 285 0.4% 4 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 4,180 1.0% 36 3 56 1.3% 17431 3 16 0.4% 16 13 East LA County Outlying 12 0% 46 0 - - -5 0 0 0% -
14 Eastern SFV 6,928 1.6% 25 0 - - -543 0 0 0% -
15 Eastern SGV 18,692 4.3% 3 3 36 0.2% 211,270 0 0 0% - 16 El Segundo 18,364 4.3% 4 2 174 0.9% 10267 5 412 2.2% 3 17 Encino 4,973 1.2% 30 0 - - -86 0 0 0% -
18 Glendale 13,663 3.2% 9 1 4 0% 23843 2 15 0.1% 17
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 2,866 0.7% 41 0 - - -265 2 69 2.4% 12 20 Hollywood 10,480 2.4% 14 3 359 3.4% 7403 3 190 1.8% 7 21 Inglewood/South LA 4,248 1.0% 34 0 - - -409 1 451 10.6% 2 22 Koreatown 15,840 3.7% 7 1 468 3.0% 6399 0 0 0% -
23 LAX 4,143 1.0% 37 0 - - -55 0 0 0% -
24 Long Beach: Downtown 8,265 1.9% 22 0 - - -274 0 0 0% - 25 Long Beach: Suburban 10,022 2.3% 15 1 100 1.0% 12508 3 16 0.2% 15 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 11,124 2.6% 13 2 319 2.9% 8493 4 178 1.6% 8 27 Mid-Cities 11,741 2.7% 10 3 27 0.2% 221,131 0 0 0% - 28 Miracle Mile 6,019 1.4% 27 0 - - -121 0 0 0% -
29 NE LA County Outlying 6 0% 47 0 - - -2 0 0 0% -
30 North Hollywood 3,519 0.8% 39 0 - - -318 2 257 7.3% 5 31 NW LA County Outlying 1 0% 48 0 - - -1 0 0 0% -
32 Olympic Corridor 4,329 1.0% 32 3 811 18.7% 3145 1 73 1.7% 9 33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 810 0.2% 44 0 - - -57 0 0 0% - 34 Park Mile 2,072 0.5% 42 0 - - -100 0 0 0% -
35 Pasadena 18,797 4.4% 2 2 220 1.2% 9931 0 0 0% -
36 Santa Clarita Valley 5,394 1.3% 28 0 - - -235 3 257 4.8% 6 37 Santa Monica 16,524 3.8% 5 2 73 0.4% 16611 4 73 0.4% 10 38 Santa Monica Mountains 31 0% 45 0 - - -7 0 0 0% -
39 Sherman Oaks 3,879 0.9% 38 0 - - -126 0 0 0% -
40 Southeast Los Angeles 9,806 2.3% 17 0 - - -789 1 32 0.3% 13 41 Studio/Universal Cities 4,300 1.0% 33 0 - - -292 0 0 0% - 42 Tarzana 1,910 0.4% 43 1 78 4.1% 1581 4 72 3.7% 11
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 24 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 43 Torrance 9,133 2.1% 19 0 - - -469 0 0 0% -
44 West Hollywood 8,067 1.9% 23 1 98 1.2% 14406 1 2 0% 21 45 West Los Angeles 2,975 0.7% 40 2 813 27.3% 2295 0 0 0% - 46 Western SFV 8,953 2.1% 20 0 - - -471 0 0 0% -
47 Western SGV 16,034 3.7% 6 3 108 0.7% 111,103 1 27 0.2% 14 48 Westwood 8,350 1.9% 21 1 47 0.6% 19185 0 0 0% -
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 10,018 2.3% 16 0 - - -212 1 5 0% 19 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 25 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
1 190th Street Corridor 1.4%34 1.4% 9$33.48 4
2 Antelope Valley -1.3%44 0.9% 16$29.84 26
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes -2.4%23 2.3% 2$38.50 42
4 Beverly Hills 0.5%1 -0.5% 35$68.33 13
5 Brentwood 0.6%11 -0.2% 29$52.17 11
6 Burbank 0.9%16 -1.3% 46$42.04 7
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill -0.5%32 0.2% 22$34.02 19
8 Catalina Island -- - -- -
9 Century City 6.2%2 -1.1% 44$65.45 1
10 Culver City -0.3%12 -0.5% 33$51.80 17
11 Downtown Los Angeles -1.9%20 0% 26$39 36
12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake -2.2%21 1.6% 7$38.86 41
13 East LA County Outlying -2.4%47 1.5% 8$28.19 43
14 Eastern SFV -3.0%40 1.2% 10$30.79 47
15 Eastern SGV 2.6%48 -0.6% 37$28.09 3
16 El Segundo -1.2%15 1.0% 13$45.60 24
17 Encino -0.7%31 -1.3% 45$35.07 21
18 Glendale 1.0%27 -0.7% 38$36.23 5
19 Hawthorne/Gardena -2.7%45 2.4% 1$29.28 46
20 Hollywood -1.7%7 0.4% 21$54.98 34
21 Inglewood/South LA -1.3%17 -0.9% 42$41.84 25
22 Koreatown -3.2%35 0.6% 20$33.26 48
23 LAX 0.9%37 0% 27$32.88 8
24 Long Beach: Downtown -1.4%36 1.1% 11$33.08 28
25 Long Beach: Suburban -0.7%38 1.7% 6$32.21 23
26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 0.5%5 -0.1% 28$56.94 12
27 Mid-Cities -1.6%41 1.1% 12$30.28 32
28 Miracle Mile -2.1%9 2.0% 5$52.34 38
29 NE LA County Outlying -2.5%25 1.0% 14$36.45 44
30 North Hollywood -2.1%29 0.9% 15$35.52 37
31 NW LA County Outlying 0.5%18 0% -$40.58 14
32 Olympic Corridor 0.8%10 -0.3% 31$52.30 10
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 0.9%4 -0.6% 36$61.19 6
34 Park Mile -2.1%22 0.8% 18$38.70 40
35 Pasadena 0.9%24 -0.3% 32$37.68 9
36 Santa Clarita Valley -0.5%26 0.1% 24$36.26 18
37 Santa Monica -0.7%3 -0.5% 34$65.03 22
38 Santa Monica Mountains -2.6%13 0.1% 25$51.30 45
39 Sherman Oaks -0.1%28 -0.2% 30$35.60 16
40 Southeast Los Angeles -1.9%42 2.0% 4$29.99 35
41 Studio/Universal Cities -1.3%19 -0.8% 40$39.68 27
42 Tarzana -1.6%30 0.1% 23$35.10 31
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 26 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
43 Torrance -1.5%33 2.2% 3$33.90 29
44 West Hollywood -1.7%6 0.8% 17$56.74 33
45 West Los Angeles -1.5%14 -0.9% 41$47.46 30
46 Western SFV -2.1%43 0.7% 19$29.93 39
47 Western SGV 3.4%46 -0.7% 39$29.18 2
48 Westwood 0%8 -1.1% 43$52.86 15
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr -0.6%39 -1.5% 47$32.04 20
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 27 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
1 190th Street Corridor 741,176 14.3% -84,238 1.6% 622
2 Antelope Valley 242,723 5.4% -62,994 1.4% 94
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 530,046 8.6% -(13,144) -0.2% 1811 4 Beverly Hills 1,992,081 17.6% -(726,375) -6.4% 4738
5 Brentwood 730,832 17.4% -(216,443) -5.1% 3737
6 Burbank 711,803 4.7% 094,437 0.6% 51
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 1,047,394 14.5% -(342,848) -4.7% 4123 8 Catalina Island - - -0 - --
9 Century City 1,509,701 13.2% -(760,927) -6.6% 4821
10 Culver City 1,501,923 15.4% 3.2160,537 1.6% 228
11 Downtown Los Angeles 11,805,050 17.1% -(176,304) -0.3% 3335 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 235,801 5.6% -(23,662) -0.6% 225 13 East LA County Outlying 3,000 24.7% -(3,000) -24.7% 1644 14 Eastern SFV 349,479 5.0% -52,190 0.8% 112
15 Eastern SGV 1,342,920 7.2% -(136,103) -0.7% 318
16 El Segundo 3,184,260 17.3% -(183,749) -1.0% 3536
17 Encino 782,177 15.7% -(132,355) -2.7% 3031
18 Glendale 1,718,620 12.6% -(218,226) -1.6% 3819
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 214,909 7.5% 0.978,082 2.7% 89
20 Hollywood 1,997,311 19.1% -(447,291) -4.3% 4539
21 Inglewood/South LA 465,228 11.0% 1.7260,670 6.1% 115 22 Koreatown 2,595,083 16.4% -(213,292) -1.3% 3634
23 LAX 1,581,080 38.2% -(156,243) -3.8% 3245
24 Long Beach: Downtown 1,222,925 14.8% -(101,059) -1.2% 2825 25 Long Beach: Suburban 1,256,751 12.5% -(416,389) -4.2% 4418 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 2,698,975 24.3% -(858,663) -7.7% 4943 27 Mid-Cities 728,033 6.2% -152,055 1.3% 36
28 Miracle Mile 1,359,719 22.6% -(116,947) -1.9% 2942
29 NE LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
30 North Hollywood 524,736 14.9% -(52,301) -1.5% 2426
31 NW LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
32 Olympic Corridor 639,436 14.8% -(25,593) -0.6% 2324
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 127,559 15.7% -(21,857) -2.7% 2132 34 Park Mile 459,011 22.1% -(87,114) -4.2% 2741
35 Pasadena 2,277,361 12.1% -(279,198) -1.5% 4017
36 Santa Clarita Valley 705,371 13.1% 3.183,617 1.6% 720 37 Santa Monica 2,575,284 15.6% -(704,233) -4.3% 4629
38 Santa Monica Mountains - - -0 0% --
39 Sherman Oaks 838,067 21.6% -(349,266) -9.0% 4240
40 Southeast Los Angeles 502,079 5.1% -(74,498) -0.8% 253 41 Studio/Universal Cities 332,622 7.7% -(16,312) -0.4% 1910 42 Tarzana 181,206 9.5% -54,742 2.9% 1012
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 28 Submarkets
Los Angeles Office
SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
43 Torrance 883,400 9.7% -(82,207) -0.9% 2613
44 West Hollywood 972,050 12.0% -(263,231) -3.3% 3916
45 West Los Angeles 467,759 15.7% -(21,507) -0.7% 2030
46 Western SFV 921,491 10.3% -(9,982) -0.1% 1714
47 Western SGV 1,048,578 6.5% -116,046 0.7% 47
48 Westwood 1,267,136 15.2% -(402,565) -4.8% 4327
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 1,599,025 16.0% -(183,425) -1.8% 3433 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 29 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Office
OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (131,547) 0% 0.2%883,683 -432,656,433
2024 (926,146) -0.2% 0.2%663,081 -432,787,980
2023 (302,441) -0.1% 0.4%1,856,781 -433,714,126
2022 1,528,361 0.4% -0.1%(512,951) -434,016,567
2021 4,260,537 1.0% -1.3%(5,441,007) -432,488,206
YTD 2,013,050 0.5% -1.1%(4,640,674) -430,240,719
2020 575,606 0.1% -1.7%(7,333,040) -428,227,669
2019 593,876 0.1% -0.5%(2,180,376) -427,652,063
2018 (127,985) 0% 0.3%1,391,155 -427,058,187
2017 1,616,323 0.4% 0%145,805 11.1427,186,172
2016 465,935 0.1% 0.9%3,789,477 0.1425,569,849
2015 693,420 0.2% 0.5%2,302,577 0.3425,103,914
2014 (457,508) -0.1% 0.7%3,079,968 -424,410,494
2013 412,028 0.1% 0.2%865,698 0.5424,868,002
2012 538,011 0.1% 0.3%1,382,536 0.4424,455,974
2011 (482,931) -0.1% -0.1%(510,529) -423,917,963
2010 (379,264) -0.1% -0.9%(3,612,399) -424,400,894
2009 1,992,346 0.5% -1.7%(7,292,792) -424,780,158
4 & 5 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,044,960 0.6% 0.8%1,363,689 0.8176,311,413
2024 275,511 0.2% 0.6%987,943 0.3175,266,453
2023 889,057 0.5% 1.0%1,732,655 0.5174,990,942
2022 2,558,951 1.5% 0.9%1,636,967 1.6174,101,885
2021 4,204,608 2.5% -1.2%(2,122,200) -171,542,934
YTD 1,910,286 1.1% -1.8%(3,039,192) -169,248,612
2020 1,415,349 0.9% -1.2%(2,087,751) -167,338,326
2019 1,220,615 0.7% -0.2%(281,152) -165,922,977
2018 1,286,251 0.8% 0.6%917,373 1.4164,702,362
2017 1,874,876 1.2% 0.4%641,148 2.9163,416,111
2016 462,867 0.3% 1.3%2,105,611 0.2161,541,235
2015 862,615 0.5% 0.9%1,474,812 0.6161,078,368
2014 (53,076) 0% 1.2%1,911,695 -160,215,753
2013 765,326 0.5% 0.3%526,522 1.5160,268,829
2012 471,276 0.3% 0.9%1,404,104 0.3159,503,503
2011 199,485 0.1% 0%27,408 7.3159,032,227
2010 769,613 0.5% -1.5%(2,306,537) -158,832,742
2009 2,196,927 1.4% -1.4%(2,178,271) -158,063,129
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 30 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Office
3 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (141) 0% 0.3%441,501 -156,109,654
2024 (140) 0% 0.4%603,395 -156,109,795
2023 18,573 0% 0.4%691,203 0156,109,935
2022 166,162 0.1% -0.4%(584,806) -156,091,362
2021 460,356 0.3% -1.5%(2,353,664) -155,925,200
YTD 220,900 0.1% -1.0%(1,620,230) -155,685,744
2020 (556,085) -0.4% -2.1%(3,217,913) -155,464,844
2019 (483,715) -0.3% -1.0%(1,498,630) -156,020,929
2018 188,868 0.1% 0.6%903,112 0.2156,504,644
2017 63,866 0% 0.7%1,030,266 0.1156,315,776
2016 502,321 0.3% 0.7%1,036,226 0.5156,251,910
2015 193,684 0.1% 0.3%504,766 0.4155,749,589
2014 128,880 0.1% 0.3%516,754 0.2155,555,905
2013 (76,420) 0% -0.1%(176,846) -155,427,025
2012 491,347 0.3% 0.4%557,412 0.9155,503,445
2011 (9,395) 0% 0.2%257,619 -155,012,098
2010 (456,861) -0.3% 0%(38,610) -155,021,493
2009 243,699 0.2% -2.1%(3,272,634) -155,478,354
1 & 2 STAR SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (1,176,366) -1.2% -0.9%(921,507) -100,235,366
2024 (1,201,517) -1.2% -0.9%(928,257) -101,411,732
2023 (1,210,071) -1.2% -0.6%(567,077) -102,613,249
2022 (1,196,752) -1.1% -1.5%(1,565,112) -103,823,320
2021 (404,427) -0.4% -0.9%(965,143) -105,020,072
YTD (118,136) -0.1% 0%18,748 -105,306,363
2020 (283,658) -0.3% -1.9%(2,027,376) -105,424,499
2019 (143,024) -0.1% -0.4%(400,594) -105,708,157
2018 (1,603,104) -1.5% -0.4%(429,330) -105,851,181
2017 (322,419) -0.3% -1.4%(1,525,609) -107,454,285
2016 (499,253) -0.5% 0.6%647,640 -107,776,704
2015 (362,879) -0.3% 0.3%322,999 -108,275,957
2014 (533,312) -0.5% 0.6%651,519 -108,638,836
2013 (276,878) -0.3% 0.5%516,022 -109,172,148
2012 (424,612) -0.4% -0.5%(578,980) -109,449,026
2011 (673,021) -0.6% -0.7%(795,556) -109,873,638
2010 (692,016) -0.6% -1.1%(1,267,252) -110,546,659
2009 (448,280) -0.4% -1.7%(1,841,887) -111,238,675
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 31 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Office
OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 139 3.1% 10.3%$46.01 59,351,003 13.7% -0.2%
2024 134 4.0% 7.0%$44.64 60,350,432 13.9% -0.3%
2023 129 4.6% 2.9%$42.92 61,933,553 14.3% -0.5%
2022 124 0.3% -1.6%$41.03 64,061,654 14.8% 0.4%
2021 123 -0.3% -1.9%$40.91 61,995,534 14.3% 2.1%
YTD 124 0% -1.2%$41.22 58,871,171 13.7% 1.5%
2020 124 -1.6% -1.6%$41.03 52,217,447 12.2% 1.8%
2019 126 5.1% 0%$41.71 44,419,984 10.4% 0.6%
2018 119 4.0% -4.9%$39.67 41,646,397 9.8% -0.4%
2017 115 4.0% -8.6%$38.14 43,158,406 10.1% 0.3%
2016 110 5.6% -12.1%$36.66 41,694,206 9.8% -0.8%
2015 105 8.0% -16.8%$34.72 44,985,377 10.6% -0.4%
2014 97 6.1% -23.0%$32.13 46,615,513 11.0% -0.8%
2013 91 4.5% -27.4%$30.30 50,135,433 11.8% -0.1%
2012 87 2.5% -30.5%$29 50,589,103 11.9% -0.2%
2011 85 0.3% -32.2%$28.28 51,433,628 12.1% 0%
2010 85 -4.9% -32.4%$28.19 51,411,419 12.1% 0.8%
2009 89 -10.7% -28.9%$29.64 48,171,859 11.3% 2.1%
4 & 5 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 140 2.9% 8.9%$52.73 32,456,095 18.4% -0.3%
2024 136 3.8% 5.9%$51.24 32,776,527 18.7% -0.4%
2023 131 4.4% 1.9%$49.34 33,490,123 19.1% -0.6%
2022 125 0.1% -2.4%$47.24 34,333,721 19.7% 0.2%
2021 125 -1.0% -2.5%$47.18 33,411,740 19.5% 3.3%
YTD 126 -1.2% -1.7%$47.57 32,013,818 18.9% 2.7%
2020 126 -1.5% -1.5%$47.68 27,064,340 16.2% 1.9%
2019 128 6.5% 0%$48.41 23,667,828 14.3% 0.8%
2018 120 4.0% -6.1%$45.44 22,166,061 13.5% 0.1%
2017 116 3.6% -9.7%$43.69 21,784,417 13.3% 0.6%
2016 112 4.9% -12.9%$42.18 20,569,094 12.7% -1.0%
2015 107 9.1% -16.9%$40.21 22,199,818 13.8% -0.5%
2014 98 6.3% -23.9%$36.86 22,812,015 14.2% -1.2%
2013 92 5.1% -28.4%$34.68 24,776,786 15.5% 0.1%
2012 87 0.8% -31.8%$33 24,537,982 15.4% -0.6%
2011 87 1.1% -32.4%$32.73 25,470,810 16.0% 0.1%
2010 86 -3.5% -33.2%$32.36 25,304,122 15.9% 1.9%
2009 89 -11.1% -30.7%$33.54 22,227,972 14.1% 2.6%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 32 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Office
3 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 136 3.2% 10.9%$43.69 18,878,262 12.1% -0.3%
2024 132 4.1% 7.5%$42.35 19,319,925 12.4% -0.4%
2023 127 4.7% 3.3%$40.69 19,923,483 12.8% -0.4%
2022 121 0.4% -1.3%$38.88 20,596,134 13.2% 0.5%
2021 121 0.3% -1.6%$38.74 19,845,188 12.7% 1.8%
YTD 122 1.0% -0.9%$39.02 18,845,048 12.1% 1.2%
2020 121 -1.9% -1.9%$38.64 17,003,918 10.9% 1.7%
2019 123 4.5% 0%$39.38 14,342,090 9.2% 0.7%
2018 118 3.8% -4.3%$37.70 13,317,675 8.5% -0.5%
2017 113 4.2% -7.8%$36.32 14,035,849 9.0% -0.6%
2016 109 6.0% -11.5%$34.86 14,989,873 9.6% -0.4%
2015 103 7.3% -16.5%$32.88 15,523,778 10.0% -0.2%
2014 96 5.6% -22.2%$30.65 15,835,488 10.2% -0.2%
2013 91 4.3% -26.3%$29.01 16,204,254 10.4% 0.1%
2012 87 4.0% -29.4%$27.82 16,103,828 10.4% -0.1%
2011 84 0.1% -32.1%$26.75 16,169,893 10.4% -0.2%
2010 83 -6.4% -32.1%$26.73 16,436,907 10.6% -0.2%
2009 89 -10.8% -27.5%$28.57 16,855,158 10.8% 2.2%
1 & 2 STAR RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 140 3.3% 12.6%$38.29 8,016,646 8.0% -0.1%
2024 135 4.3% 8.9%$37.06 8,253,980 8.1% -0.2%
2023 130 4.9% 4.5%$35.54 8,519,947 8.3% -0.5%
2022 124 0.6% -0.4%$33.90 9,131,799 8.8% 0.5%
2021 123 0.6% -0.9%$33.70 8,738,606 8.3% 0.6%
YTD 124 1.2% -0.3%$33.92 8,012,305 7.6% -0.1%
2020 122 -1.5% -1.5%$33.50 8,149,189 7.7% 1.7%
2019 124 3.1% 0%$34.02 6,410,066 6.1% 0.2%
2018 120 4.4% -3.0%$32.99 6,162,661 5.8% -1.0%
2017 115 4.7% -7.1%$31.59 7,338,140 6.8% 1.1%
2016 110 6.6% -11.3%$30.17 6,135,239 5.7% -1.0%
2015 103 6.9% -16.8%$28.30 7,261,781 6.7% -0.6%
2014 97 6.3% -22.2%$26.48 7,968,010 7.3% -1.1%
2013 91 3.4% -26.8%$24.91 9,154,393 8.4% -0.7%
2012 88 4.1% -29.2%$24.09 9,947,293 9.1% 0.2%
2011 84 -1.2% -32.0%$23.14 9,792,925 8.9% 0.2%
2010 85 -5.3% -31.1%$23.42 9,670,390 8.7% 0.6%
2009 90 -9.8% -27.3%$24.72 9,088,729 8.2% 1.3%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 33 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Office
OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 198- $484.95 5.6%
2024 -- - -- 192- $470.77 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 184- $451.58 5.5%
2022 -- - -- 175- $428.72 5.6%
2021 -- - -- 177- $434.62 5.5%
YTD $3.3B553 2.0% $405.91$6,887,235 1785.3% $436.39 5.6% 2020 $4.1B505 2.6% $396.60$9,767,246 1765.5% $430.23 5.6% 2019 $7.8B758 3.8% $515.06$13,940,256 1755.5% $428.31 5.6% 2018 $7.1B1,040 5.5% $358.11$10,465,688 1665.2% $407.13 5.6% 2017 $10.4B1,246 8.0% $355.15$14,686,008 1615.5% $393.83 5.5% 2016 $11B1,029 7.3% $386.37$15,063,365 1565.3% $382.34 5.5% 2015 $6.5B1,102 5.7% $299.51$8,896,417 1465.7% $357.04 5.6% 2014 $8.7B983 6.8% $312.07$11,916,032 1336.5% $325.85 5.7% 2013 $9.4B875 8.4% $280.69$14,848,416 1226.3% $298.20 6.0% 2012 $4B847 4.9% $237.21$8,578,308 1136.9% $276.86 6.2% 2011 $2.9B641 3.3% $242.89$7,404,827 1087.7% $265.48 6.4% 2010 $1.5B398 1.9% $216.91$5,225,998 977.1% $237.98 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 4 & 5 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 194- $543.30 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 189- $528.27 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 181- $507.59 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 173- $482.56 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 175- $490.07 5.4%
YTD $660.9M17 0.8% $462.99$41,184,309 1765.6% $492.82 5.4% 2020 $2.1B49 3.2% $431.53$65,115,224 1765.1% $491.38 5.4% 2019 $3B37 3.4% $522.86$90,206,884 1745.5% $486.48 5.4% 2018 $3.1B62 5.8% $378.54$53,085,305 1665.1% $463.57 5.4% 2017 $6.3B85 10.1% $392.38$79,630,910 1615.0% $451.63 5.3% 2016 $7.3B96 10.4% $456.49$84,117,152 1574.7% $440.37 5.3% 2015 $2.6B72 5.0% $344.91$44,369,728 1475.3% $410.46 5.3% 2014 $5.4B63 9.6% $354.54$89,019,933 1346.7% $375.24 5.5% 2013 $6.7B73 13.7% $316.13$100,968,046 1245.8% $347.02 5.7% 2012 $2.4B67 6.4% $276.22$65,358,019 1156.4% $323 5.9%
2011 $1.4B28 3.1% $283.09$51,801,776 1117.8% $309.83 6.1% 2010 $647.4M16 1.9% $248.28$53,780,838 996.4% $277.02 6.6% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 34 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Office
3 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 199- $447.15 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 193- $433.73 5.6%
2023 -- - -- 185- $415.74 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 176- $394.55 5.7%
2021 -- - -- 178- $399.67 5.6%
YTD $1.5B186 2.5% $435.09$10,955,259 1795.7% $402.36 5.7% 2020 $1.3B162 2.4% $349.70$10,360,039 1755.9% $393.36 5.7% 2019 $3.5B241 4.5% $552.30$20,523,507 1755.6% $392.37 5.7% 2018 $2.9B292 5.8% $354.33$13,736,641 1665.2% $372.48 5.7% 2017 $2.8B337 6.7% $309.95$12,957,239 1605.8% $359.01 5.7% 2016 $2.2B247 4.9% $313.83$12,391,084 1565.5% $349.48 5.6% 2015 $2.7B279 6.7% $273.65$12,730,734 1466.0% $328.12 5.7% 2014 $2B273 5.2% $267.27$10,194,403 1346.0% $299.82 5.8% 2013 $1.9B249 5.7% $223.31$10,493,478 1216.6% $272.51 6.1% 2012 $981.6M254 4.1% $189.84$7,669,606 1128.2% $252.56 6.3% 2011 $1.1B191 3.7% $233.40$9,027,888 1088.1% $242.33 6.5% 2010 $551.5M146 2.0% $195.16$6,483,352 978.1% $217.25 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 1 & 2 STAR SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 204- $444.04 5.7%
2024 -- - -- 198- $430.13 5.7%
2023 -- - -- 190- $411.65 5.6%
2022 -- - -- 180- $389.93 5.7%
2021 -- - -- 182- $394.29 5.7%
YTD $1.1B350 3.1% $348.84$3,454,200 1815.1% $393.06 5.7% 2020 $776.3M294 1.9% $396.40$2,920,800 1775.2% $383.32 5.7% 2019 $1.3B480 3.3% $426.92$3,763,895 1775.5% $384.96 5.7% 2018 $1.1B686 4.8% $319.51$2,757,486 1685.4% $364.70 5.7% 2017 $1.3B824 6.8% $309.77$3,150,539 1615.3% $349.41 5.7% 2016 $1.5B686 6.1% $276.78$3,297,824 1545.4% $334.63 5.7% 2015 $1.3B751 5.2% $280.70$2,735,158 1435.5% $311.17 5.8% 2014 $1.2B647 5.2% $248.29$2,596,067 1306.7% $282.39 5.9% 2013 $888.2M553 4.6% $216.36$2,260,740 1186.4% $255.17 6.2% 2012 $548.2M526 3.8% $200.83$1,841,827 1096.1% $236.23 6.5% 2011 $405.1M422 3.0% $175.73$1,660,038 1047.2% $226.11 6.7% 2010 $255.5M236 1.5% $200.93$1,409,229 946.6% $203.83 7.2% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 35 Los Angeles - CA
PREPARED BY
Andrew Chang
Program Specialist
Retail Market Report
RETAIL MARKET REPORT
Market Key Statistics 1
Leasing 3
Rent 8
Construction 10
Under Construction Properties 12
Sales 14
Sales Past 12 Months 16
Economy 18
Market Submarkets 23
Supply & Demand Trends 30
Rent & Vacancy 34
Sale Trends 38
Los Angeles Retail
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Overview
Los Angeles Retail
797K 210K 5.2% 0%
12 Mo Deliveries in SF 12 Mo Net Absorption in SF Vacancy Rate 12 Mo Rent Growth The Los Angeles retail sector was particularly exposed to the pandemic, but certain segments strengthened and
retailers were able to make investments that added
technology to operations that could lower labor costs and streamline services. Goods retailers like home goods and furniture had sales increase. Grocery stores and fitness centers drive traffic to properties and have been pursued as anchors to neighborhood centers and new mixed-use
developments.
The retail sector will need to evolve and rightsize by
repurposing or demolishing defunct retail properties.
Some longtime vacant big-box sites with excellent
freeway access were acquired with plans to reposition
them as industrial sites. For example, a vacant 140,000- SF former Costco site in Montebello was sold to a
developer that reached an agreement with the city to
convert a portion of the site to a last-mile delivery
facility. That follows the conversion of a former Costco site to an Amazon last-mile facility in Torrance last year.
Industrial developer CenterPoint Properties recently
acquired a longtime vacant former Walmart store in
Norwalk that also meets the typical criteria of a last mile facility.
Vacancy has increased for several years, and all
plausible economic scenarios in CoStar's property
market forecast anticipate market vacancy to rise for at least the near term. Average asking rates are projected to correspondingly decline through the end of the year.
The current construction pipeline is modest and will have little impact on market fundamentals on a metro-wide
basis. Construction is bifurcated among high-end retail in major mixed-use developments and small retail pads
usually with drive-thru capabilities. Large projects
nearing completion include The Grand on Bunker Hill in
Downtown Los Angeles and Hollywood Park in
Inglewood. Construction will commence early next year
on the waterfront development project in San Pedro that will add 100,000 SF at the Ports O'Call village.
Los Angeles has some of the most prized and expensive
retail real estate in the nation, much of which is on the Westside. Beverly Hills and its famed Rodeo Drive are
world renowned, but other high-street retail districts in Abbot Kinney, Santa Monica, and West Hollywood have
rental rates that surpass the highest rates in most other markets.
One underlying advantage L.A. retail has compared to
most markets in the nation is its relatively lower retail stock per capita. As an example, Los Angeles has about
20% less retail square footage than the Chicago metro
despite having a higher population. Development is much harder to launch in L.A. than in more pro-growth metros with greater land availability and potential retail sites compete with industrial and multifamily uses. While there is obsolete retail that needs to be filtered out of the local market, these properties are coveted for a variety of
conversion options.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 2 Overview
Los Angeles Retail
KEY INDICATORS
Market RentVacancy RateRBACurrent Quarter Availability Rate Net Absorption SF Deliveries SF Under
Construction
$43.518.2%42,911,469Malls 6.6% (1,064) 0 49,814
$32.363.9%23,871,759Power Center 4.3% 1,200 0 4,200
$31.107.0%102,303,432Neighborhood Center 8.6% 3,627 0 355,287 $29.145.3%36,081,325Strip Center 6.1% (9,353) 0 31,700
$32.853.9%239,193,848General Retail 5.1% (11,370) 0 1,178,306 $38.887.8%2,745,698Other 9.3% 0 0 0
$33.185.2%447,107,531Market 6.1% (16,960) 0 1,619,307
Forecast
Average
Historical
Average12 MonthAnnual Trends Peak When Trough When
4.7%4.7%0%Vacancy Change (YOY) 5.7% 2010 Q1 3.0% 2007 Q3 1,468,509935,614210KNet Absorption SF 6,891,784 2007 Q3 (4,167,346) 2009 Q3 1,646,1482,307,799797KDeliveries SF 6,518,848 2008 Q4 819,232 2021 Q3
2.7%1.2%0%Rent Growth 5.4% 2007 Q2 -5.3% 2009 Q4
N/A$3.5B$4.8BSales Volume $5.7B 2015 Q2 $979.6M 2009 Q4 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 3 Leasing
Los Angeles Retail
Gross leasing activity since the onset of the pandemic
has seen a sustained pickup since cratering in 20Q2.
Generally, the categories with high leasing activity have been grocery, restaurants, and fitness. At the metro
level, the 5.2% rate has receded slightly from its highest level in seven years. Net absorption is on track for its first positive quarter in 21Q3 in two years and will total its highest amount in four years. East Hollywood/Silverlake has the highest 12-month rolling net absorption totals
among submarkets followed by the Santa Clarita Valley
and Inglewood/South LA. Conversely, Eastern SGV,
Santa Monica, Downtown Los Angeles, and Koreatown
each have more than 100,000 SF of negative absorption
during that period.
Fitness centers have been successful at utilizing outdoor space, especially in Southern California, where the
weather permits outdoor training and exercise for the
vast majority of the year. Notable leases include Gold's Gym, which leased 45,000 SF at the north end of Third
Street Promenade in Santa Monica. Chuze Fitness
signed a 15-year, 40,000-SF lease in La Verne to
anchor a center that was previously occupied by Orchard Supply Hardware. Chuze Fitness has added many
locations in other parts of Southern California, but this is only its second location in L.A. County. In Whittier, EOS Fitness leased 37,340 SF at The Groves, a master-
planned community being by Brookfield in partnership
with Lennar Homes. Plans include 150,000 SF of new
retail space with Stater Bros. grocer occupying 45,000
SF.
Restaurants were active signing leases for high-profile locations that were vacated over the past two years and in new construction. Hollywood Japanese hotspot
Yamashiro signed a lease at the Ports O'Call waterfront redevelopment in San Pedro. At 5100 Wilshire Blvd. in
Miracle Mile, the 6,350-SF ground floor restaurant space was leased with an opening planned for next year. Maple & Ash leased 13,672 SF at the MGM building at 835 N
Beverly Drive for the first California location of the
concept crafted by two-Michelin-star chef Danny Grant
that serves seafood and steaks. Other major
announcements were famed New York chef Daniel
Boulud agreeing to occupy 6,500 SF at a ground-floor
restaurant space for the office building under
construction at 9200 Wilshire Blvd. in Beverly Hills.
Grocers have been active, having thrived during the
pandemic as an essential business. Amazon opened its
first Amazon Fresh location in the nation in Woodland
Hills. Since then, more than a dozen of the grocery
stores have opened in Southern California including Long Beach, Ladera Heights, North Hollywood, Northridge,
and Whittier. Amazon recently announced that a Whole
Foods location in Sherman Oaks would be the first in the country to utilize its cashierless technology next year.
Grocers are also coveted as key anchors to new
developments. Local chain Gelson's preleased 36,000
SF at West Edge, a large-mixed use project under
construction in West L.A. Erewhon, a high-end grocer
with six locations in L.A. County, signed a 15,000-SF
lease at the Culver Steps development in Culver City in the ground floor of an office building leased by Amazon Studios. Other ground floor retail tenants include Pop's Bagels, Philz Coffee, Salt & Straw and Corepower Yoga.
Erewhon will also open locations in Beverly Hills and
Studio City later this year.
Other bright spots include non-traditional retail uses
such as education, religious, and medical tenants. These tenants add stability to a property and provide cash flow to investors who are struggling with the pressures that the brick-and-mortar retail industry has faced from
online competitors. In Santa Clarita, a church signed a three-year deal for 23,600 SF at 23744-23780 Newhall
Ave. as an anchor tenant inside of the strip mall. The
property was offered at $1/SF/month triple net with free rent concessions. In the Mid-Cities Submarket, OFL
Charter Schools signed a 13,000-SF lease in July at
2001 N Long Beach Blvd. in Compton for a newly
renovated space.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 4 Leasing
Los Angeles Retail
NET ABSORPTION, NET DELIVERIES & VACANCY
VACANCY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 5 Leasing
Los Angeles Retail
AVAILABILITY RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 6 Leasing
Los Angeles Retail
12 MONTH NET ABSORPTION SF IN SELECTED BUILDINGS
3rd Qtr
Building Name/Address Submarket Bldg SF Vacant SF
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 4th Qtr 12 Month
Net Absorption SF
East Hollywood/Silve… 194,749 34,820 (4,320) (9) 0 0 145,6455520 W Sunset Blvd Western SFV 136,325 0 136,325 0 0 0 136,32521300 Roscoe Blvd Woodland Hills/Warn… 153,597 0 115,234 0 0 0 115,234Fallbrook Center Pasadena 105,000 0 105,000 0 0 0 105,0002940 E Foothill Blvd Downtown Los Angeles 61,077 0 0 0 61,077 0 61,077560 S Los Angeles St Hollywood 54,632 0 0 0 54,632 0 54,6326400 W Sunset Blvd West Los Angeles 216,756 2,611 (1,091) 0 1,480 0 54,253Plaza La Cienega El Segundo 53,300 0 0 53,300 0 0 53,300Manhattan Village Santa Clarita Valley 53,779 0 0 51,619 0 0 51,619Castaic Village Shopping Center Torrance 165,000 0 48,544 0 0 0 48,544Mervyn's Plaza
Downtown Los Angeles 400,000 0 0 0 48,479 0 48,479The Bloc Long Beach: Suburban 42,000 0 0 42,000 0 0 42,0006325 E Spring St Westwood 45,000 0 0 0 0 0 41,0861360-1380 Westwood Blvd Eastern SGV 74,368 720 0 39,592 0 0 38,934La Verne Courtyard Mid-Cities 41,720 0 0 0 35,000 0 35,00011541 Rosecrans Ave Southeast Los Angeles 30,044 0 30,044 0 0 0 30,044Friendly Hills Marketplace Mid-Cities 29,320 0 0 0 29,320 0 29,320South St Mall
1,856,667 38,151 429,736 186,502 229,988 0 1,090,492Subtotal Primary Competitors 445,918,939 23,192,056 (482,972) (583,182) 966,623 (19,768) (880,727)Remaining Los Angeles Market 447,775,606 23,230,207 (53,236) (396,680) 1,196,611 (19,768) 209,765Total Los Angeles Market 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 7 Leasing
Los Angeles Retail
TOP RETAIL LEASES PAST 12 MONTHS
Building Name/Address Submarket Leased SF Tenant Name Tenant Rep Company Leasing Rep CompanyQtr Fallbrook Center Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 115,234 Furniture City - Colliers InternationalQ1 21 Sherman Oaks Galleria Sherman Oaks 87,046 Regal Cinemas - JLLQ2 21 Food 4 Less * Inglewood/South LA 79,101 Food 4 Less - NewmarkQ4 20 Crossroads Plaza Southeast Los Angeles 60,000 - - Colliers InternationalQ1 21 6400 W Sunset Blvd Hollywood 54,632 Impact Museums Savills Cushman & WakefieldQ2 21 LA Kings Valley Ice Center * Eastern SFV 52,254 LA Kings Valley Ice Center Agora Realty & Man… Agora Realty & Manag…Q4 20 Norwalk Fitness Village * Southeast Los Angeles 50,000 LA Fitness - -Q4 20 The Groves-Whittier Southeast Los Angeles 45,110 Stater Bros. Markets Remer Radcliff Corp… Retail InsiteQ2 21 Third Street Promenade Santa Monica 44,697 Gold's Gym JLL JLLQ2 21 Hawaiian Gardens Towne Center Long Beach: Suburban 43,130 Eos Fitness - JLLQ1 21 La Verne Courtyard Eastern SGV 39,592 Chuze Fitness - Treelane RealtyQ2 21 The Groves-Whittier Southeast Los Angeles 37,340 EOS Fitness Retail Insite Retail InsiteQ2 21 West Edge West Los Angeles 36,000 Gelson's - Beta;CBREQ2 21 11541 Rosecrans Ave Mid-Cities 35,000 AltaMed - CBREQ1 21 Westrux International Southeast Los Angeles 32,489 Westrux International - -Q3 21 Cerritos Plaza South * Mid-Cities 28,000 CVS - Coreland CompaniesQ4 20 5240 Lankershim Blvd * North Hollywood 28,000 Laemmle Noho 7 - -Q2 21 44805-44819 10th St W Antelope Valley 26,402 Boulevard Hydro Inc. RE/MAX Crissman… Coldwell Banker Comm…Q1 21 Northridge University Plaza Western SFV 25,950 - - David MoradzadehQ1 21 Bouquet Canyon Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 23,885 Seafood City CBRE Cypress Retail GroupQ2 21 Stagecoach Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 23,600 The Center Church - Lee & Associates;Lee…Q3 21 Carson Shopping Center * Torrance 23,000 CVS Pharmacy - CBREQ3 21 18247 Sherman Way Western SFV 22,333 WSS NAI Capital Springstead & AssociatesQ4 20 Avalon Plaza Torrance 22,275 - - JLLQ4 20
5439 N Rosemead Blvd Western SGV 22,000 TS Emporium CBRE CBREQ4 20 888 S Vermont Ave Koreatown 21,786 - - CBREQ4 20
21243 Avalon Blvd Torrance 21,781 - - Lee & AssociatesQ2 21 99 Cents Only Store Western SFV 20,250 - - Mushmel Properties Co…Q3 21 Fallas Paredes Mid-Cities 20,000 - - BetaQ2 21
Office Depot Miracle Mile 19,450 - - Kennedy Wilson Proper…Q1 21 Santa Fe Springs Marketplace * Southeast Los Angeles 18,014 O'Reilly Auto Parts - America West Properti…Q4 20 Skyline Ranch Plaza Santa Clarita Valley 18,000 Grocery Outlet - NAI CapitalQ4 20 Former Toys R US - Redevelopment… Antelope Valley 18,000 - - Cushman & Wakefield |…Q3 21 22850 Hawthorne Blvd Torrance 18,000 Universal Appliance NAI Capital NAI CapitalQ2 21 Santa Fe Springs Marketplace Southeast Los Angeles 17,880 Pic N Save Lee & Associates Lee & Associates Com…Q2 21 Indian Hill Plaza Eastern SGV 17,800 - - Reliable PropertiesQ3 21 Coliseum Center * Culver City 17,755 Goodwill - -Q2 21
Lancaster Commerce Center Antelope Valley 17,404 Hope of the Valley Thrift S… - -Q4 20 The Shoppes @ Highlander Center Western SGV 17,400 Grocery Outlet Newmark;Springste… Globe Properties;Lee &…Q4 20 Destination O-Eight Antelope Valley 17,000 AutoZone Canaan Pacific CBREQ4 20 *Renewal
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 8 Rent
Los Angeles Retail
Retail rents in Los Angeles have declined since the
onset of the pandemic and hover around $33.00/SF.
That's about 50% higher than the national average of
$22.00/SF. Other metro areas have recovered much
faster than Los Angeles. However, from early 2012 to the first half of 2020, average asking rates increased by 27% in L.A., outpacing the national average, which saw gains of 21% during this period.
Current average asking rates are down 0.0% year over
year. In terms of retail subtypes, all had declines in
21Q2, but strip and neighborhood center rates declined
at a slower pace relative to the power centers, malls, and general retail segments. Only a very small number of
submarkets have positive annual rent growth, mainly in
the northern part of the county. The San Fernando,
Santa Clarita and Antelope Valleys are among the
strongest performing submarkets for rent increases,
although gains are minimal.
Notably, there is a wide spread in asking rates in Greater Los Angeles. Average rents are four times higher in
Beverly Hills than in parts of the San Gabriel Valley.
Looking ahead, metro rental rates are projected to
decline for at least the near term based on the CoStar
baseline economic rent forecast.
MARKET RENT GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 9 Rent
Los Angeles Retail
MARKET RENT PER SQUARE FEET
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 10 Construction
Los Angeles Retail
The past 12 months have had 340,000 SF of new retail
space deliver in L.A. County. The most notable
completion in 21Q2 was the 53,000-SF retail expansion
of the Manhattan Village shopping center in Manhattan
Beach. The Village Shops space is all outdoors and
replaced indoor portions that were on the site. Tenants in the expansion portion include Boa Steakhouse, Roku
Sushi, Canadian restaurant Joey and a slew of casual
restaurants, fitness studios, and clothing retailers. In Long Beach, ground-up construction of a new 42,000-
SF grocery store completed at the Lakewood Plaza
Marketplace in East Long Beach with Amazon Fresh as
the tenant. The former Haggen Food & Pharmacy space
was reduced in size by 10,000 SF, and outdoor seating
was added. Ivy Station in Culver City is expecting grand openings for its tenants by year end including Equator
Coffees, LA Ale Works, Mamoun's falafel, StretchLab,
YogaSix and Healthy Spot.
Looking at the current construction pipeline, there is 1.7 million SF of retail space under construction in the metro.
This is modest from a historical perspective. Two very
high-profile projects are expected to deliver by the end of the year. Related California's The Grand project on
Bunker Hill in Downtown Los Angeles will add 175,000
SF of retail space to the massive mixed-use apartment,
condo, and hotel project. Also in Downtown Los Angeles, the mixed-use Oceanwide Plaza in South Park was
slated to complete in 2019 with just over 150,000 SF of retail space, but the Chinese-owned project adjacent to Staples Center halted construction due to funding issues.
Work is nearing completion on the first phase of the retail portion of the Hollywood Park development in Inglewood
adjacent to SoFi Stadium. Phase one will deliver 160,000 SF of new space. Tenants in the project include a mix of local and national tenants such as a gastropub run by
the founder of the Three Weavers Brewing Company,
Olympix Fitness, and Cinepolis Luxury Cinemas, a luxury theater chain based in Mexico.
Santa Monica has more than 100,000 SF of new
construction underway, most in ground-floor retail in
multifamily developments. The largest project is the retail portion of a large mixed-use development at 500
Broadway called The Park. The 54,000-SF ground-floor
retail development at the site of the former Fred Segal store will anchor a seven-story, 262-unit project that will finish in 2022. Santa Monica is an excellent example of the changing dynamics for retail properties. While the
new construction mixed-use development will add retail, the nearby Santa Monica Place mall is seeking to
convert space vacated by Bloomingdale's into office.
In Beverly Hills, two major planned hotel projects include significant ground-floor retail amenities. On Rodeo Drive, French luxury goods company LVMH is planning
construction on a 115-room Cheval Blanc hotel that will include 24,300 SF of ground-floor and second-floor
retail space. Meanwhile, at the longtime vacant
Robinson's May site on Wilshire Blvd., the city council approved a $2 billion mixed-use development that
includes approximately 35,000 SF of retail and restaurant space.
In San Pedro, work is finally set to commence on the
West Harbor project that will redevelop the Ports O'Call village into a waterfront development with restaurants
and retail. Approximately 65,000 SF was preleased to
seven tenants including Hollywood's famed Japanese
restaurant Yamashiro. The project is slated to open in
2023.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 11 Construction
Los Angeles Retail
DELIVERIES & DEMOLITIONS
SUBMARKET CONSTRUCTION
Average Building Size
RankUnder Constr
Under Construction Inventory
All ExistingSF (000) Pre-Leased SF (000)SubmarketNo. RankBldgs Pre-Leased % 1 Downtown Los Angeles 2 329 164,59653.5% 8 17,407176 2 2 Inglewood/South LA 1 320 320,000100% 1 6,929320 1
3 Southeast Los Angeles 13 154 11,84794.5% 4 8,099146 10 4 Culver City 2 119 59,50061.3% 7 8,71473 5
5 Century City 1 94 94,0003.7% 10 177,4434 3
6 Studio/Universal Cities 1 94 94,00095.3% 3 7,29790 3
7 Western SGV 7 92 13,18782.7% 5 8,97476 9
8 Santa Monica 3 78 26,12931.1% 9 8,67424 6
9 West Hollywood 3 78 26,05074.7% 6 8,03158 7
10 Eastern SGV 3 74 24,748100% 1 11,99274 8
All Other 26 219 8,40729.0% 9,37263
Totals 62 1,652 26,64366.9% 9,4661,104
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 12 Under Construction Properties
Los Angeles Retail
64 1,658,572 0.4% 67.0%
Properties Square Feet Percent of Inventory Preleased
UNDER CONSTRUCTION PROPERTIES
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Apr 20203883 W Century Blvd 320,000 1 Apr 2022 Wilson Meany The Kroenke Group
1 Feb 2019100 S Grand Ave
The Grand 176,000 20 Mar 2022 Related California Irvine Related California Irvine
2 Mar 20171110 S Figueroa St
The Collection at Ocean… 153,192 3 Nov 2021 China Oceanwide Holdings Co. Ltd.
China Oceanwide Holdings Co. Ltd.
3 Oct 20183321 S La Cienega Blvd
Cumulus District 100,000 1 Nov 2021 Carmel Partners
Carmel Partners
4 Aug 201912825 Ventura Blvd
The Shops at The Sports… 94,000 2 Nov 2021 Weintraub Real Estate Group Midwood Investment & Developm…
5 Dec 20172025 Avenue of the Stars
Century Plaza Retail 94,000 46 Nov 2022 -
Woodridge Capital Partners LLC
6 Jan 2019Sorenson Ave
The Groves 82,450 1 Nov 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
7 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 13 Under Construction Properties
Los Angeles Retail
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Property Name/Address Rating Bldg SF Stories Start Complete Developer/Owner Oct 2018960-962 N La Brea Ave 58,417 5 Dec 2021 BMB Investment Corporation BMB Investment Corporation
8 Nov 2019500 Broadway
The Park Retail Portion 54,000 1 Nov 2021 Witkoff
KRE Capital, LLC
9 Jan 2017101-111 W Valley Blvd
The Shops and Residenc… 48,126 5 Jan 2022 AYS Hospitality Inc.
AYS Hospitality Inc.
10 Aug 20206150 Laurel Canyon Blvd
NOHO West Retail G 44,314 2 Nov 2021 Merlone Geier Management, Inc.
Goldstein Planting Investments
11 Jul 20212539 E Garvey Ave N 42,455 1 Jan 2022 -
-
12 Apr 2021667 Auto Center Dr
Mazda 30,590 - Nov 2021 Sam Ershadi
Sam Ershadi
13 Feb 20182413 Pacific Coast Hwy
Atrium Design Center 26,991 3 Nov 2021 -
South Bay Design Center Inc
14 Jan 20181802 4th St
Santa Monica College E… 20,000 1 Nov 2021 -
City of Santa Monica
15 Jan 20195211 W Adams Blvd 19,000 3 Nov 2021 -
CIM Group, LP
16 Jun 2021NWC Bellflower Blvd and C
Belle Fleur Centre 17,000 1 Jun 2022 -
-
17 Jan 2019Whittier Blvd 15,800 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
18 Dec 20193001 N Hollywood Way
R-2 15,000 1 Nov 2021 Overton Moore Properties
Overton Moore Properties
19 Dec 20193001-3007 N Hollywood W…
R-1 15,000 1 Nov 2021 Overton Moore Properties
Overton Moore Properties
20 Feb 201813767-13811 Roscoe Blvd
Roscoewood Center - Ne… 12,593 2 Dec 2021 -
Elias Shokrian
21 Dec 20168533 W Sunset Blvd
8533 Sunset 11,840 3 Dec 2021 Simha Engineering & Assoc The Farid and Faranhaz Amid Fa…
22 Aug 2018550 W Garvey Ave 11,081 2 Nov 2021 -
HSL Realty, Inc.
23 Dec 20202127 Huntington 10,000 1 Nov 2021 -
-
24 Jul 202110949 Garvey Ave 10,000 1 Feb 2022 -
-
25 Jan 2019Whittier Blvd
Bldg 4 8,910 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
26 Nov 2017613 Rose Ave 8,515 2 Nov 2021 -
Tatiana Botton
27 Jan 2019Sorenson Ave
Bldg 1 8,450 1 Dec 2021 -
Brookfield Asset Management, Inc.
28 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 14 Sales
Los Angeles Retail
Retail property sales volume totaled $4.8 billion for the past 12 months, which is the highest retail sales volume in the country during that time period, demonstrating the sheer size of the market. Properties in Los Angeles are still expensive compared with many Sun Belt markets,
where occupancy and rent growth are higher.
Annual totals for 2020 were boosted by Simon
Properties' 80% purchase of mall REIT Taubman's
portfolio, which included the Beverly Center, valued at $560 million, as part of the $3.4 billion investment. Simon Properties acquired an 80% stake in the 100-property
portfolio in 20Q4.
Recent mall sales include properties with potential to
redevelop portions of the property with residential units.
The largest sale of the quarter was Harridge
Development Group's $140 million acquisition of Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza mall in August. The mall was more
than 50% vacant at the time of sale primarily because of vacancies by Walmart and Sears, among others. The
mall has had several proposals for conversions and
additions; Harridge envisions adding nearly 1,000
residential units at the 42-acre property over the next several years.
Another large shopping center that sold after more than a year on the market was Eagle Rock Plaza, which sold
in June after ownership paused the sale due to the
pandemic. New owners Atlas Capital Group and Eastern
Real Estate acquired the 465,000-SF property for $76
million, or $163/SF, and could reposition the aging
property in line with current trends for open-air lifestyle centers with restaurants, especially if anchor tenants
close. The Macy's lease is set to expire in 2023.
Residential prices in the area have appreciated
considerably, and the site has significant parking that could be repurposed for a residential component.
Triple net deals to top-tier tenants generated high sales across a variety of categories. In Westchester, a triple net leased Amazon Fresh supermarket commanded $35
million for the, 29,456-SF store. The building was fully leased with 15 years left on the term. The in-place cap rate was reported at 4.2%. Small pad drive-thru
restaurants generally traded with 4%-4.5% cap rates,
depending on the neighborhood. In Manhattan Beach, a
Carl's Jr. single-tenant drive thru sold for $5.6 million in September at a 3.85% cap rate. The seller, CalBay
Development, had acquired it 19 months earlier for $3.5 million at a 4.25% cap rate, representing a 63%
increase.
In Glendale, Decron Properties sold a freestanding retail building totaling 111,624 SF on 7.9 acres at 5040 San
Fernando Road for $61.8 million, or $553/SF at a 4.5%
cap rate. The property was fully leased to Home Depot
on a triple net basis with eight years remaining on its lease.
The average modeled price per SF currently stands at
$390, well above the national retail average of $220/SF.
Average market cap rates, presently 5.4%, are far below the national average of 7.0%
Declines in recent quarters have been modest.
Downward pressure on pricing is forecast to persist for at least the near term in the metro, but it's worth noting that the sector is the most stratified among property types
when it comes to asset performance and investor
demand.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 15 Sales
Los Angeles Retail
SALES VOLUME & MARKET SALE PRICE PER SF
MARKET CAP RATE
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 16 Sales Past 12 Months
Los Angeles Retail
1,466 5.2% $368 6.3%
Sale Comparables Avg. Cap Rate Avg. Price/SF Avg. Vacancy At Sale
SALE COMPARABLE LOCATIONS
SALE COMPARABLES SUMMARY STATISTICS
Sales Attributes Low Average Median High
Sale Price $50,000 $3,414,717 $1,550,000 $558,981,214
Price/SF $1.05 $368 $391 $18,900
Cap Rate 1.6% 5.2% 5.0% 10.0%
Time Since Sale in Months 0.0 5.5 5.1 12.0
Property Attributes Low Average Median High
Building SF 170 9,586 3,658 834,000
Stories 1 1 1 4
Typical Floor SF 170 7,205 3,300 292,505
Vacancy Rate At Sale 0% 6.3% 0% 100%
Year Built 1799 1958 1956 2021
Star Rating
2.3 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 17 Sales Past 12 Months
Los Angeles Retail
Property Name - Address Rating Yr Built Bldg SF Vacancy Price Price/SF Property
Sale Date
Sale
Cap Rate
RECENT SIGNIFICANT SALES
-
1 Beverly Center 1982 834,000 0% $558,981,214 $838
8500 Beverly Blvd
12/29/2020 -
-
2 457-459 N Rodeo Dr 1946 11,625 0% $122,000,000 $10,49511/13/2020 - -
3 Eagle Rock Plaza 1974 445,370 7.5% $72,695,924 $163
2700 Colorado Blvd
6/17/2021 -
-
4 5040 San Fernando Rd 1992 111,624 0% $61,750,000 $5538/27/2021 4.5% -
5 5905 Van Nuys Blvd 2007 150,887 0% $58,465,948 $38711/4/2020 - -
6 Gaju Market Place 2016 91,883 0% $57,500,000 $626
450 S Western Ave
12/7/2020 5.0%
-
7 Keyes European Mercedes 2011 163,493 0% $54,300,000 $332 5400 Van Nuys Blvd
11/4/2020 -
-
8 Longo Lexus 1985 292,505 0% $51,350,000 $176
3530 Peck Rd
3/31/2021 -
-
9 Crenshaw Plaza 1947 343,879 0% $45,006,413 $131
3650 W Martin Luther King…
8/24/2021 -
-
10 South Bay Village 1971 104,906 0% $37,141,654 $354
19330-19350 Hawthorne…
1/7/2021 -
-
11 6855 S La Cienega Blvd 2020 29,456 0% $35,000,000 $1,1887/15/2021 4.2% -
12 Macy's 1948 263,626 0% $34,000,000 $129
4005 Crenshaw Blvd
8/24/2021 -
-
13 Sears 1951 157,150 50.0% $33,900,000 $216
12121 Victory Blvd
6/1/2021 -
-
14 Walmart Supercenter 1998 111,830 100% $32,300,000 $289 11729 Imperial
5/4/2021 -
-
15 800-812 N Broadway 1958 79,500 0% $29,500,000 $3717/19/2021 - -
16 Westrux International 1989 32,489 0% $27,425,000 $844 15555 Valley View Ave
7/20/2021 -
-
17 Walmart 1947 205,568 0% $26,904,459 $131
4101 Crenshaw Blvd
8/24/2021 -
-
18 1007-1029 W Martin Luth… 1965 41,802 8.2% $23,730,873 $56811/25/2020 - -
19 Westlake Village Market… 1998 50,242 0% $22,525,000 $448 5770 Lindero Canyon Rd
3/5/2021 5.1%
-
20 Norwalk Toyota 1987 59,902 0% $21,000,000 $351
11404-11450 Imperial Hwy
11/10/2020 -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 18 Economy
Los Angeles Retail
The Los Angeles economy is recovering slowly from the
pandemic, a trend that followed the Great Recession
when the local economy was slower to recover than
other areas. The metro unemployment rate, after seeing
a sustained improvement for months in the second half
of last year, has plateaued above 10%. New coronavirus
cases, as well as deaths, have temporarily spiked due to variants, but schools reopened and restrictions have
eased.
Los Angeles' position as the entertainment capital of the world and the increased demand for video streaming and
social media had been a boon to the L.A. economy
during the past several years. The pandemic accelerated demand for streaming services, although studios have
targeted theater only releases for 2022, assuming
widespread adoption of vaccinations. The entertainment
business directly or indirectly employs one out of five workers in L.A. County. Content creators have banked
studio space and made investments focused on the
future of the industry. Warner Bros. is currently under construction on its 800,000 SF Second Century
expansion in Burbank. Studio space is at a premium in
the Hollywood, Burbank, and Glendale neighborhoods,
and warehouses in neighboring areas are taking
advantage of that demand with creative industrial
conversions.
Tourism is important for the local economy and the
impact to this sector and its employees has been
considerable. Before the pandemic, over 500,000 people
in the county were employed in the leisure and
hospitality industry. The city had more than 50 million visitors in 2019, but the pandemic severely impacted
travel. Stores, restaurants, and lodging in tourist hotspots like Downtown L.A., Hollywood, Beverly Hills, and Santa Monica have been particularly impacted. However, the
market is set for a major rebound as large events such
as the 2022 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics spur the
hospitality and retail sectors.
The industrial sector has sustained growth through the
pandemic as warehousing demands increased by
ecommerce retail operations. A backup at the ports has
led to a record number of ships waiting to unload cargo.
Continued bottlenecks, however, could soon become a
headwind for LA's industrial market if conditions at the ports don't improve. The need for warehousing space
and limited land has led to developers targeting infill development sites that can be scraped for modern
warehouse construction. The overall Southern California industrial market, which includes the five county area of Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside and
Orange Counties recently surpassed 2 billion SF of
industrial inventory.
As more of a structural issue that needs to be addressed long term, the prohibitive cost of housing in L.A. is a major impediment to hiring and is often cited as a
motivating factor for companies to relocate to other parts of the country. Recent departures include construction
giant AECOM. However, the aerospace industry is strong
and major employers such as SpaceX, Rocket Lab and
Relativity Space help sustain the diverse Los Angeles
economy.
Despite near-term issues related to the pandemic, the
metro economy possesses many positive attributes. It
has two major talent generators in USC and UCLA along
with top tier universities such as Cal Tech that support a growing tech economy. It is perennially among the top
five metros in the country for venture capital investment.
The metro is an attractive location for immigrants and
educated talent. More people making six-figure
paychecks continue to move to L.A. than are leaving.
Education levels, while below the national average,
improve every year.
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 19 Economy
Los Angeles Retail
LOS ANGELES EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY IN THOUSANDS
Industry Jobs LQ MarketUS USMarketUSMarket
CURRENT JOBS CURRENT GROWTH 10 YR HISTORICAL 5 YR FORECAST -0.16%-0.46%0.75%-1.58%4.89%2.74%0.9319Manufacturing
0.25%0.69%1.00%0.90%4.55%7.36%1.0831Trade, Transportation and Utilities
0.22%0.72%0.49%0.16%3.56%6.87%0.9405 Retail Trade
0.52%0.49%1.46%0.53%2.47%4.21%0.9222Financial Activities
0.82%1.11%-0.11%-0.14%-0.10%-0.26%0.9546Government
0.56%0.69%2.65%3.78%5.68%7.21%0.7158Natural Resources, Mining and Construction
1.14%1.37%1.84%2.59%6.02%6.29%1.2870Education and Health Services
1.09%1.10%2.03%1.46%6.99%7.92%1.0620Professional and Business Services
1.64%3.29%0.56%0.12%7.33%13.44%2.3193Information
2.55%4.74%1.19%1.42%15.31%21.08%1.0458Leisure and Hospitality
0.76%2.77%0.56%-0.28%5.40%9.66%0.8137Other Services
Total Employment 4,354 1.0 7.27% 5.46% 0.99% 1.18% 1.48% 0.89% Source: Oxford Economics
LQ = Location Quotient
Source: Oxford Economics
JOB GROWTH (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 20 Economy
Los Angeles Retail
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE (%)
NET EMPLOYMENT CHANGE (YOY)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 21 Economy
Los Angeles Retail
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
POPULATION GROWTH (YOY %)
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 22 Economy
Los Angeles Retail
NET POPULATION CHANGE (YOY)
DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS
12 Month ChangeCurrent Level
Metro USMetro USDemographic Category
10 Year Change
Metro US Metro US
5 Year Forecast
Population 330,367,5009,903,349 -0.4% 0.2% 0% 0.6% 0% 0.5% Households 123,394,6093,288,566 -0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.7% 0% 0.4% Median Household Income $74,364$83,172 6.1% 6.0% 4.8% 4.0% 2.9% 2.5% Labor Force 162,784,4695,037,628 2.9% 1.5% 0.3% 0.6% 0.7% 0.6% Unemployment 5.8%10.0% -5.6% -2.9% -0.2% -0.3% - -
Source: Oxford Economics
POPULATION GROWTH
Source: Oxford Economics
LABOR FORCE GROWTH
INCOME GROWTH
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 23 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
LOS ANGELES SUBMARKETS
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 24 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 1 190th Street Corridor 350 0.1% 44 0 - - -24 4 22 6.3% 11 2 Antelope Valley 15,898 3.6% 10 1 4 0% 231,188 3 28 0.2% 10 3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 10,664 2.4% 16 1 5 0% 221,295 0 0 0% - 4 Beverly Hills 3,706 0.8% 30 0 - - -363 0 0 0% -
5 Brentwood 810 0.2% 43 0 - - -95 0 0 0% -
6 Burbank 8,312 1.9% 20 2 30 0.4% 131,128 0 0 0% -
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 3,142 0.7% 32 0 - - -210 0 0 0% - 8 Catalina Island 94 0% 49 0 - - -21 0 0 0% -
9 Century City 1,065 0.2% 42 1 94 8.8% 56 0 0 0% -
10 Culver City 6,562 1.5% 24 2 119 1.8% 4753 4 57 0.9% 5 11 Downtown Los Angeles 16,972 3.8% 8 2 329 1.9% 1975 0 0 0% - 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 8,948 2.0% 19 2 9 0.1% 171,305 1 178 2.0% 1 13 East LA County Outlying 119 0% 46 0 - - -21 0 0 0% - 14 Eastern SFV 18,751 4.2% 6 3 20 0.1% 162,060 0 0 0% - 15 Eastern SGV 41,853 9.4% 2 3 74 0.2% 103,490 2 14 0% 15 16 El Segundo 2,690 0.6% 33 4 21 0.8% 15177 1 53 2.0% 6 17 Encino 1,726 0.4% 39 0 - - -107 0 0 0% -
18 Glendale 16,328 3.6% 9 0 - - -2,330 3 3 0% 22
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 10,244 2.3% 18 1 4 0% 241,170 2 9 0.1% 18 20 Hollywood 4,854 1.1% 27 2 6 0.1% 20448 0 0 0% -
21 Inglewood/South LA 13,671 3.1% 12 1 320 2.3% 21,973 1 5 0% 19 22 Koreatown 10,843 2.4% 15 0 - - -1,065 1 4 0% 20
23 LAX 1,614 0.4% 40 0 - - -119 0 0 0% -
24 Long Beach: Downtown 6,877 1.5% 23 0 - - -968 1 4 0.1% 21 25 Long Beach: Suburban 13,217 3.0% 13 2 5 0% 211,412 1 42 0.3% 7 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 5,537 1.2% 26 1 9 0.2% 18776 3 68 1.2% 3 27 Mid-Cities 50,173 11.2% 1 3 24 0% 146,231 5 33 0.1% 8 28 Miracle Mile 2,332 0.5% 35 0 - - -307 0 0 0% -
29 NE LA County Outlying 160 0% 45 0 - - -25 0 0 0% -
30 North Hollywood 6,241 1.4% 25 1 44 0.7% 11931 1 33 0.5% 9 31 NW LA County Outlying 112 0% 47 0 - - -6 0 0 0% -
32 Olympic Corridor 2,466 0.6% 34 0 - - -278 0 0 0% -
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 1,232 0.3% 41 1 7 0.6% 19137 0 0 0% - 34 Park Mile 2,054 0.5% 38 0 - - -205 0 0 0% -
35 Pasadena 14,810 3.3% 11 0 - - -1,624 1 105 0.7% 2
36 Santa Clarita Valley 12,885 2.9% 14 0 - - -786 7 62 0.5% 4 37 Santa Monica 7,043 1.6% 22 3 78 1.1% 8812 0 0 0% -
38 Santa Monica Mountains 106 0% 48 0 - - -15 0 0 0% -
39 Sherman Oaks 4,162 0.9% 29 0 - - -355 1 2 0.1% 23
40 Southeast Los Angeles 23,869 5.3% 4 13 154 0.6% 32,947 2 16 0.1% 14 41 Studio/Universal Cities 3,466 0.8% 31 1 94 2.7% 5475 0 0 0% - 42 Tarzana 2,312 0.5% 36 0 - - -240 0 0 0% -
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 25 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET INVENTORY
12 Month Deliveries Under Construction
Bldgs SF (000) Percent Rank
Inventory
Bldgs SF (000) Percent RankBldgs SF (000) % Market RankSubmarketNo. 43 Torrance 19,192 4.3% 5 2 30 0.2% 121,215 6 17 0.1% 13 44 West Hollywood 10,336 2.3% 17 3 78 0.8% 91,287 3 9 0.1% 17 45 West Los Angeles 4,549 1.0% 28 0 - - -682 0 0 0% -
46 Western SFV 17,767 4.0% 7 0 - - -1,578 1 18 0.1% 12
47 Western SGV 27,001 6.0% 3 7 92 0.3% 73,009 2 13 0% 16 48 Westwood 2,289 0.5% 37 0 - - -243 0 0 0% -
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 8,172 1.8% 21 0 - - -415 0 0 0% - 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 26 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
1 190th Street Corridor -0.7%33 0.2% 13$30.19 45
2 Antelope Valley -0.6%46 1.0% 6$23.29 40
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes -0.6%23 -0.2% 25$36.40 34
4 Beverly Hills -0.3%1 -0.4% 35$94.66 8
5 Brentwood -0.5%5 -0.4% 38$64.03 18
6 Burbank -0.1%19 -0.3% 29$37.65 1
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill -0.5%16 -0.1% 21$39.58 26
8 Catalina Island -0.4%44 5.9% 1$24.59 12
9 Century City -0.7%13 -0.5% 39$43.31 44
10 Culver City -0.6%17 -0.3% 30$39.07 30
11 Downtown Los Angeles -5.7%24 -0.3% 28$35.70 48
12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake -0.4%21 -0.4% 36$37.23 10 13 East LA County Outlying -0.4%47 4.9% 2$22.30 11
14 Eastern SFV -0.5%38 0.9% 7$27.36 23
15 Eastern SGV -0.5%45 0.6% 9$24.20 25
16 El Segundo -0.6%10 -0.3% 27$45.05 29
17 Encino -0.6%22 -0.2% 26$37 31
18 Glendale -0.6%26 -0.2% 23$35.52 33
19 Hawthorne/Gardena -0.3%41 0.1% 17$26.15 6
20 Hollywood -0.5%8 -0.4% 33$52.93 16
21 Inglewood/South LA -0.5%43 -0.2% 22$24.72 20
22 Koreatown -0.4%29 -0.5% 40$32.62 13
23 LAX -0.5%31 0% 19$30.78 24
24 Long Beach: Downtown -0.5%30 -0.5% 42$32.12 22
25 Long Beach: Suburban -0.6%37 -0.2% 24$28.10 32
26 Marina Del Rey/Venice -0.8%6 -0.3% 32$56.92 46
27 Mid-Cities -1.1%42 0.2% 15$25.83 47
28 Miracle Mile -10.0%27 -0.9% 48$35.52 49
29 NE LA County Outlying -0.6%49 3.6% 3$17.55 37
30 North Hollywood -0.5%32 0.2% 12$30.66 19
31 NW LA County Outlying -0.4%48 1.5% 5$19.70 14
32 Olympic Corridor -0.6%11 -1.0% 49$43.96 38
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu -0.5%2 0.7% 8$73.43 27
34 Park Mile -0.5%39 -0.6% 45$27.32 21
35 Pasadena -0.4%20 -0.3% 31$37.33 15
36 Santa Clarita Valley -0.6%35 0.5% 10$29.35 42
37 Santa Monica -0.3%3 -0.6% 44$69.29 3
38 Santa Monica Mountains -0.3%7 2.7% 4$53.42 5
39 Sherman Oaks -0.5%14 -0.6% 46$39.72 17
40 Southeast Los Angeles -0.6%40 0.2% 14$26.31 36
41 Studio/Universal Cities -0.4%12 -0.6% 47$43.36 9
42 Tarzana -0.6%28 0% 18$34.37 35
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 27 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET RENT
Growth
Market Rent
Per SFSubmarketNo.
12 Month Market Rent QTD Annualized Market Rent
RankRank GrowthRank
43 Torrance -0.2%25 0% 20$35.53 2
44 West Hollywood -0.3%4 -0.5% 41$64.40 7
45 West Los Angeles -0.5%15 -0.5% 43$39.65 28
46 Western SFV -0.6%36 0.4% 11$28.11 39
47 Western SGV -0.6%34 0.2% 16$29.35 41
48 Westwood -0.3%9 -0.4% 37$49.32 4
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr -0.7%18 -0.4% 34$38.79 43
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 28 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
1 190th Street Corridor 22,144 6.3% 16.21,370 0.4% 2436 2 Antelope Valley 1,056,741 6.6% 0.2113,622 0.7% 338
3 Beach Cities/Palos Verdes 532,554 5.0% -(17,186) -0.2% 3622 4 Beverly Hills 259,261 7.0% -(32,902) -0.9% 4140
5 Brentwood 77,913 9.6% -(14,035) -1.7% 3344
6 Burbank 453,279 5.5% -(54,179) -0.7% 4526
7 Calabasas/Westlake Vill 180,995 5.8% -(20,770) -0.7% 3832 8 Catalina Island - - -0 0% --
9 Century City 4,594 0.4% -1,206 0.1% 252
10 Culver City 227,833 3.5% 1.236,738 0.6% 139
11 Downtown Los Angeles 1,064,173 6.3% -(44,185) -0.3% 4335 12 East Hollywood/Silver Lake 508,534 5.7% -100,194 1.1% 531 13 East LA County Outlying - - -0 0% --
14 Eastern SFV 883,762 4.7% -66,598 0.4% 717
15 Eastern SGV 2,450,260 5.9% -(288,339) -0.7% 4933
16 El Segundo 88,070 3.3% 8.17,239 0.3% 227
17 Encino 89,536 5.2% -(1,971) -0.1% 3123
18 Glendale 483,983 3.0% -(20,154) -0.1% 375
19 Hawthorne/Gardena 1,186,282 11.6% -(24,842) -0.2% 4046 20 Hollywood 266,195 5.5% -(24,115) -0.5% 3927
21 Inglewood/South LA 440,163 3.2% 0.235,563 0.3% 146
22 Koreatown 527,934 4.9% -(76,365) -0.7% 4621
23 LAX 26,943 1.7% -13,051 0.8% 213
24 Long Beach: Downtown 324,271 4.7% 0.143,906 0.6% 1118 25 Long Beach: Suburban 565,146 4.3% 1.042,409 0.3% 1215 26 Marina Del Rey/Venice 395,984 7.2% 1.257,271 1.0% 841 27 Mid-Cities 2,402,857 4.8% 0152,175 0.3% 219
28 Miracle Mile 278,860 12.0% -6,191 0.3% 2347
29 NE LA County Outlying 5,635 3.5% -13,178 8.2% 2010
30 North Hollywood 300,690 4.8% -(6,870) -0.1% 3220
31 NW LA County Outlying 453 0.4% -(453) -0.4% 281
32 Olympic Corridor 216,846 8.8% -(15,042) -0.6% 3443
33 Pacific Palisades/Malibu 73,303 5.9% -(588) 0% 2934
34 Park Mile 108,418 5.3% -(15,516) -0.8% 3524
35 Pasadena 816,333 5.5% 1.570,288 0.5% 629
36 Santa Clarita Valley 709,308 5.5% 0.6101,496 0.8% 428 37 Santa Monica 586,951 8.3% -(139,087) -2.0% 4742
38 Santa Monica Mountains 7,278 6.9% -(1,633) -1.5% 3039 39 Sherman Oaks 112,089 2.7% -19,816 0.5% 174
40 Southeast Los Angeles 1,020,350 4.3% 0.245,594 0.2% 1014 41 Studio/Universal Cities 147,265 4.2% -19,649 0.6% 1813 42 Tarzana 76,837 3.3% -15,295 0.7% 198
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 29 Submarkets
Los Angeles Retail
SUBMARKET VACANCY & NET ABSORPTION
12 Month Absorption
Rank Construc. Ratio
Vacancy
SF % of InvSF PercentSubmarketNo. Rank
43 Torrance 751,636 3.9% -(39,717) -0.2% 4212
44 West Hollywood 674,505 6.5% 0.154,781 0.5% 937
45 West Los Angeles 253,326 5.6% -34,261 0.8% 1530
46 Western SFV 949,132 5.3% 0.1167,737 0.9% 125
47 Western SGV 990,623 3.7% -(149,985) -0.6% 4811
48 Westwood 263,685 11.5% -(47,995) -2.1% 4445
49 Woodland Hills/Warner Ctr 367,277 4.5% -20,367 0.2% 1616 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 30 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Retail
OVERALL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 1,422,676 0.3% 0.3%1,242,060 1.1450,562,438
2024 1,207,065 0.3% 0.3%1,527,697 0.8449,139,762
2023 288,776 0.1% 0.4%1,972,774 0.1447,932,697
2022 90,981 0% 0.3%1,516,265 0.1447,643,921
2021 576,446 0.1% 0.2%852,292 0.7447,552,940
YTD 131,037 0% 0.2%701,404 0.2447,107,531
2020 952,812 0.2% -0.4%(1,984,105) -446,976,494
2019 344,717 0.1% -0.3%(1,125,036) -446,023,682
2018 (38,464) 0% -0.3%(1,252,133) -445,678,965
2017 1,229,741 0.3% 0.2%964,254 1.3445,717,429
2016 56,651 0% 0.8%3,527,870 0444,487,688
2015 2,162,930 0.5% 0.3%1,373,114 1.6444,431,037
2014 382,648 0.1% 0.5%2,285,331 0.2442,268,107
2013 513,379 0.1% 0.5%2,383,621 0.2441,885,459
2012 936,546 0.2% 0%(215,406) -441,372,080
2011 617,549 0.1% 0.3%1,401,717 0.4440,435,534
2010 1,370,182 0.3% 0.4%1,789,981 0.8439,817,985
2009 1,827,634 0.4% -0.7%(3,199,341) -438,447,803
MALLS SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 436,190 1.0% 1.0%428,344 1.043,883,515
2024 396,105 0.9% 1.0%431,008 0.943,447,325
2023 179,720 0.4% 0.8%350,313 0.543,051,220
2022 (64,029) -0.1% 0.4%169,237 -42,871,500
2021 77,360 0.2% 0.1%29,311 2.642,935,529
YTD 53,300 0.1% -0.4%(176,791) -42,911,469
2020 328,706 0.8% -0.2%(78,744) -42,858,169
2019 629,410 1.5% 0.2%75,218 8.442,529,463
2018 8,670 0% -0.1%(31,636) -41,900,053
2017 7,050 0% -0.5%(219,438) -41,891,383
2016 128,000 0.3% 0.8%315,390 0.441,884,333
2015 1,471,281 3.7% 2.5%1,029,243 1.441,756,333
2014 236,192 0.6% 0.6%232,155 1.040,285,052
2013 142,443 0.4% 0.4%172,845 0.840,048,860
2012 226,999 0.6% 0.9%359,422 0.639,906,417
2011 (2,050) 0% 0.1%44,209 -39,679,418
2010 143,768 0.4% 1.4%557,038 0.339,681,468
2009 210,781 0.5% -1.3%(500,965) -39,537,700
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 31 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Retail
POWER CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 (34,528) -0.1% -0.2%(36,875) -23,712,023
2024 (35,216) -0.1% 0%(4,530) -23,746,551
2023 (39,278) -0.2% 0.2%41,780 -23,781,767
2022 (44,146) -0.2% 0.1%15,253 -23,821,045
2021 (1,568) 0% 0.9%213,098 -23,865,191
YTD 5,000 0% 1.1%252,255 023,871,759
2020 0 0% -0.8%(184,259) -23,866,759
2019 8,000 0% -0.2%(46,371) -23,866,759
2018 323,252 1.4% 1.4%327,465 1.023,858,759
2017 90,970 0.4% 1.3%312,831 0.323,535,507
2016 348,315 1.5% 0.6%129,448 2.723,444,537
2015 299,608 1.3% 1.4%312,328 1.023,096,222
2014 311,373 1.4% 1.6%356,292 0.922,796,614
2013 5,500 0% 0.6%136,241 022,485,241
2012 0 0% -0.3%(61,057) -22,479,741
2011 313,754 1.4% 0.9%201,590 1.622,479,741
2010 210,693 1.0% 2.8%616,392 0.322,165,987
2009 763,355 3.6% 0.7%155,077 4.921,955,294
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 350,558 0.3% 0.3%310,899 1.1103,169,326
2024 304,923 0.3% 0.4%454,058 0.7102,818,768
2023 82,029 0.1% 0.7%704,273 0.1102,513,845
2022 (105,515) -0.1% 0.2%248,610 -102,431,816
2021 382,418 0.4% -0.1%(97,108) -102,537,331
YTD 148,519 0.1% -0.2%(178,994) -102,303,432
2020 202,528 0.2% -0.4%(412,932) -102,154,913
2019 171,163 0.2% -0.1%(70,736) -101,952,385
2018 79,952 0.1% -0.6%(631,155) -101,781,222
2017 257,585 0.3% 0.3%316,863 0.8101,701,270
2016 353,517 0.3% 1.1%1,140,277 0.3101,443,685
2015 474,803 0.5% 0.3%281,157 1.7101,090,168
2014 292,594 0.3% 0.8%766,347 0.4100,615,365
2013 292,974 0.3% 0.5%534,755 0.5100,322,771
2012 158,637 0.2% -0.2%(212,198) -100,029,797
2011 450,025 0.5% 0.5%469,579 1.099,871,160
2010 663,911 0.7% 0.1%142,399 4.799,421,135
2009 633,829 0.6% -0.6%(546,214) -98,757,224
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 32 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Retail
STRIP CENTER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 39,434 0.1% 0%12,429 3.236,090,431
2024 31,271 0.1% 0.2%58,125 0.536,050,997
2023 (13,383) 0% 0.3%120,099 -36,019,726
2022 (45,432) -0.1% 0.1%52,806 -36,033,109
2021 19,360 0.1% 0.2%62,489 0.336,078,541
YTD 22,144 0.1% 0.3%90,396 0.236,081,325
2020 65,663 0.2% -0.5%(178,999) -36,059,181
2019 38,173 0.1% -0.4%(141,114) -35,993,518
2018 52,628 0.1% 0.3%107,357 0.535,955,345
2017 35,830 0.1% 0.1%50,651 0.735,902,717
2016 101,557 0.3% 1.2%429,726 0.235,866,887
2015 60,063 0.2% 0.9%337,186 0.235,765,330
2014 69,086 0.2% 1.2%414,333 0.235,705,267
2013 140,601 0.4% 0.9%338,116 0.435,636,181
2012 137,360 0.4% 0.1%20,754 6.635,495,580
2011 73,372 0.2% -0.3%(92,659) -35,358,220
2010 135,141 0.4% 0.2%66,311 2.035,284,848
2009 94,306 0.3% -0.5%(181,616) -35,149,707
GENERAL RETAIL SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 623,875 0.3% 0.2%524,608 1.2240,953,791
2024 503,842 0.2% 0.2%580,540 0.9240,329,916
2023 78,777 0% 0.3%740,707 0.1239,826,074
2022 355,295 0.1% 0.4%1,030,017 0.3239,747,297
2021 100,228 0% 0.3%648,462 0.2239,392,002
YTD (97,926) 0% 0.3%711,117 -239,193,848
2020 348,415 0.1% -0.4%(1,058,356) -239,291,774
2019 (591,888) -0.2% -0.4%(1,014,949) -238,943,359
2018 (502,966) -0.2% -0.4%(1,001,758) -239,535,247
2017 838,306 0.4% 0.2%559,589 1.5240,038,213
2016 (874,738) -0.4% 0.6%1,491,084 -239,199,907
2015 (142,825) -0.1% -0.2%(594,997) -240,074,645
2014 (526,597) -0.2% 0.2%447,371 -240,217,470
2013 (68,139) 0% 0.5%1,197,883 -240,744,067
2012 413,550 0.2% -0.1%(310,557) -240,812,206
2011 (217,552) -0.1% 0.3%750,179 -240,398,656
2010 216,669 0.1% 0.2%469,191 0.5240,616,208
2009 125,363 0.1% -0.9%(2,136,146) -240,399,539
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 33 Supply & Demand Trends
Los Angeles Retail
OTHER SUPPLY & DEMAND
Net AbsorptionInventory
% of Inv Construction RatioSF SF Growth % Growth SFYear 2025 7,147 0.3% 0.1%2,655 2.72,753,352
2024 6,140 0.2% 0.3%8,496 0.72,746,205
2023 911 0% 0.6%15,602 0.12,740,065
2022 (5,192) -0.2% 0%342 -2,739,154
2021 (1,352) 0% -0.1%(3,960) -2,744,346
YTD 0 0% 0.1%3,421 02,745,698
2020 7,500 0.3% -2.6%(70,815) -2,745,698
2019 89,859 3.4% 2.7%72,916 1.22,738,198
2018 0 0% -0.8%(22,406) -2,648,339
2017 0 0% -2.1%(56,242) -2,648,339
2016 0 0% 0.8%21,945 02,648,339
2015 0 0% 0.3%8,197 02,648,339
2014 0 0% 2.6%68,833 02,648,339
2013 0 0% 0.1%3,781 02,648,339
2012 0 0% -0.4%(11,770) -2,648,339
2011 0 0% 1.1%28,819 02,648,339
2010 0 0% -2.3%(61,350) -2,648,339
2009 0 0% 0.4%10,523 02,648,339
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 34 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Retail
OVERALL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 129 2.0% 12.9%$37.61 20,183,653 4.5% 0%
2024 127 3.1% 10.7%$36.86 20,094,672 4.5% -0.1%
2023 123 4.6% 7.4%$35.76 20,462,855 4.6% -0.4%
2022 117 3.0% 2.7%$34.20 22,122,188 4.9% -0.3%
2021 114 0.6% -0.3%$33.21 23,459,152 5.2% -0.1%
YTD 114 0% -0.4%$33.18 23,100,571 5.2% -0.1%
2020 113 -0.8% -0.8%$33.03 23,679,746 5.3% 0.6%
2019 114 2.2% 0%$33.30 20,763,555 4.7% 0.3%
2018 112 2.3% -2.2%$32.58 19,362,899 4.3% 0.3%
2017 109 3.4% -4.4%$31.84 18,124,897 4.1% 0.1%
2016 106 3.1% -7.6%$30.78 17,797,985 4.0% -0.8%
2015 103 4.4% -10.3%$29.87 21,284,090 4.8% 0.1%
2014 98 4.2% -14.1%$28.61 20,751,256 4.7% -0.4%
2013 94 3.1% -17.5%$27.46 22,654,007 5.1% -0.4%
2012 91 1.2% -20.0%$26.63 24,522,913 5.6% 0.2%
2011 90 -0.8% -21.0%$26.31 23,370,961 5.3% -0.2%
2010 91 -3.8% -20.4%$26.52 24,166,229 5.5% -0.1%
2009 95 -5.3% -17.2%$27.58 24,589,898 5.6% 1.1%
MALLS RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 137 1.9% 11.2%$49.06 2,917,796 6.6% -0.1%
2024 134 3.0% 9.1%$48.15 2,910,877 6.7% -0.1%
2023 130 4.4% 6.0%$46.77 2,946,730 6.8% -0.4%
2022 125 2.8% 1.5%$44.77 3,117,464 7.3% -0.5%
2021 121 0.6% -1.3%$43.54 3,350,111 7.8% 0.1%
YTD 121 -0.4% -1.4%$43.51 3,530,038 8.2% 0.5%
2020 121 -1.9% -1.9%$43.28 3,299,947 7.7% 0.9%
2019 123 2.5% 0%$44.13 2,892,497 6.8% 1.2%
2018 120 2.7% -2.4%$43.07 2,338,305 5.6% 0.1%
2017 117 3.6% -4.9%$41.95 2,297,999 5.5% 0.5%
2016 113 4.0% -8.2%$40.50 2,071,511 4.9% -0.5%
2015 108 5.4% -11.8%$38.93 2,258,901 5.4% 0.3%
2014 103 4.7% -16.3%$36.93 2,073,845 5.1% 0%
2013 98 4.0% -20.0%$35.28 2,069,808 5.2% -0.1%
2012 95 1.9% -23.1%$33.94 2,100,210 5.3% -0.4%
2011 93 0.5% -24.6%$33.29 2,232,633 5.6% -0.1%
2010 92 -3.3% -24.9%$33.14 2,278,892 5.7% -1.1%
2009 96 -4.5% -22.3%$34.27 2,692,162 6.8% 1.8%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 35 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Retail
POWER CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 133 2.1% 13.3%$36.87 791,316 3.3% 0%
2024 130 3.2% 11.0%$36.10 787,796 3.3% -0.1%
2023 126 4.7% 7.5%$34.97 817,266 3.4% -0.3%
2022 121 3.1% 2.7%$33.41 897,192 3.8% -0.2%
2021 117 0.6% -0.4%$32.40 955,537 4.0% -0.9%
YTD 117 -0.1% -0.5%$32.36 922,415 3.9% -1.1%
2020 116 -1.0% -1.0%$32.21 1,174,670 4.9% 0.8%
2019 117 2.3% 0%$32.54 990,411 4.1% 0.2%
2018 115 3.1% -2.2%$31.81 936,040 3.9% -0.1%
2017 111 3.9% -5.1%$30.86 940,253 4.0% -1.0%
2016 107 3.4% -8.7%$29.72 1,162,114 5.0% 0.9%
2015 104 5.0% -11.7%$28.74 943,247 4.1% -0.1%
2014 99 4.1% -15.9%$27.36 955,967 4.2% -0.3%
2013 95 3.1% -19.2%$26.28 1,000,886 4.5% -0.6%
2012 92 1.4% -21.7%$25.48 1,131,627 5.0% 0.3%
2011 91 -0.6% -22.8%$25.12 1,070,570 4.8% 0.4%
2010 91 -4.7% -22.3%$25.27 958,406 4.3% -1.9%
2009 96 -4.4% -18.5%$26.51 1,364,105 6.2% 2.6%
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 127 1.9% 13.4%$35.13 6,255,242 6.1% 0%
2024 125 3.0% 11.2%$34.46 6,223,547 6.1% -0.2%
2023 121 4.5% 8.0%$33.46 6,376,706 6.2% -0.6%
2022 116 2.9% 3.4%$32.02 7,000,570 6.8% -0.3%
2021 113 0.6% 0.5%$31.13 7,348,019 7.2% 0.4%
YTD 113 0.3% 0.4%$31.10 7,192,163 7.0% 0.3%
2020 112 -0.2% -0.2%$30.93 6,864,650 6.7% 0.6%
2019 112 2.4% 0%$30.98 6,247,530 6.1% 0.2%
2018 109 2.3% -2.3%$30.26 6,005,631 5.9% 0.7%
2017 107 3.7% -4.5%$29.58 5,271,129 5.2% 0%
2016 103 2.9% -7.9%$28.52 5,290,444 5.2% -0.8%
2015 100 4.1% -10.6%$27.71 6,077,204 6.0% 0.2%
2014 96 3.8% -14.0%$26.63 5,883,558 5.8% -0.5%
2013 93 2.4% -17.2%$25.64 6,357,311 6.3% -0.3%
2012 91 0.7% -19.2%$25.04 6,599,092 6.6% 0.4%
2011 90 -1.0% -19.7%$24.86 6,228,257 6.2% -0.1%
2010 91 -3.6% -18.9%$25.12 6,255,280 6.3% 0.5%
2009 94 -5.7% -15.9%$26.06 5,733,768 5.8% 1.2%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 36 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Retail
STRIP CENTER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 125 2.0% 13.9%$33 1,708,551 4.7% 0%
2024 122 3.1% 11.7%$32.36 1,689,389 4.7% -0.1%
2023 119 4.6% 8.3%$31.39 1,722,180 4.8% -0.4%
2022 114 2.9% 3.6%$30.02 1,850,156 5.1% -0.2%
2021 110 0.7% 0.7%$29.17 1,941,085 5.4% -0.1%
YTD 110 0.3% 0.6%$29.14 1,914,945 5.3% -0.2%
2020 110 0.2% 0%$28.97 1,983,197 5.5% 0.7%
2019 109 2.3% -0.2%$28.92 1,738,535 4.8% 0.5%
2018 107 2.2% -2.4%$28.26 1,570,042 4.4% -0.2%
2017 105 3.2% -4.6%$27.64 1,627,057 4.5% 0%
2016 101 2.7% -7.6%$26.78 1,641,878 4.6% -0.9%
2015 99 3.9% -10.0%$26.08 1,970,047 5.5% -0.8%
2014 95 3.8% -13.3%$25.11 2,247,170 6.3% -1.0%
2013 91 2.3% -16.5%$24.19 2,592,485 7.3% -0.6%
2012 89 0.6% -18.4%$23.65 2,790,000 7.9% 0.3%
2011 89 -1.4% -18.8%$23.52 2,673,394 7.6% 0.5%
2010 90 -4.2% -17.7%$23.85 2,507,363 7.1% 0.2%
2009 94 -5.9% -14.1%$24.89 2,441,043 6.9% 0.8%
GENERAL RETAIL RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 128 2.1% 13.0%$37.32 8,307,491 3.4% 0%
2024 126 3.1% 10.7%$36.56 8,284,208 3.4% -0.1%
2023 122 4.6% 7.3%$35.45 8,398,720 3.5% -0.3%
2022 117 3.0% 2.6%$33.89 9,040,864 3.8% -0.3%
2021 113 0.5% -0.4%$32.89 9,643,001 4.0% -0.2%
YTD 113 -0.1% -0.6%$32.85 9,325,692 3.9% -0.3%
2020 113 -0.9% -0.9%$32.72 10,138,543 4.2% 0.6%
2019 114 2.1% 0%$33.03 8,754,158 3.7% 0.2%
2018 111 2.2% -2.0%$32.36 8,389,400 3.5% 0.2%
2017 109 3.3% -4.1%$31.67 7,887,384 3.3% 0.1%
2016 105 2.9% -7.2%$30.66 7,587,205 3.2% -1.0%
2015 103 4.3% -9.8%$29.81 9,967,913 4.2% 0.2%
2014 98 4.3% -13.5%$28.58 9,515,741 4.0% -0.4%
2013 94 3.3% -17.0%$27.40 10,489,709 4.4% -0.5%
2012 91 1.3% -19.7%$26.52 11,754,395 4.9% 0.3%
2011 90 -0.9% -20.8%$26.17 11,030,288 4.6% -0.4%
2010 91 -3.9% -20.0%$26.42 12,001,650 5.0% -0.1%
2009 95 -5.4% -16.7%$27.50 12,255,532 5.1% 0.9%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 37 Rent & Vacancy
Los Angeles Retail
OTHER RENT & VACANCY
Market Rent
Per SF Index % Growth Vs Hist PeakYear
Vacancy
SF Percent Ppts Chg
2025 130 2.0% 12.8%$43.98 203,257 7.4% 0.1%
2024 127 3.0% 10.6%$43.13 198,855 7.2% -0.1%
2023 124 4.5% 7.4%$41.86 201,253 7.3% -0.5%
2022 118 2.9% 2.7%$40.05 215,942 7.9% -0.2%
2021 115 0.6% -0.2%$38.91 221,399 8.1% 0.1%
YTD 115 0% -0.3%$38.88 215,318 7.8% -0.1%
2020 114 -0.8% -0.8%$38.68 218,739 8.0% 2.8%
2019 115 2.3% 0%$38.98 140,424 5.1% 0.5%
2018 113 2.2% -2.2%$38.12 123,481 4.7% 0.8%
2017 110 3.7% -4.3%$37.30 101,075 3.8% 2.1%
2016 106 3.3% -7.7%$35.98 44,833 1.7% -0.8%
2015 103 4.5% -10.7%$34.82 66,778 2.5% -0.3%
2014 98 4.1% -14.5%$33.32 74,975 2.8% -2.6%
2013 95 3.1% -17.9%$32.01 143,808 5.4% -0.1%
2012 92 1.1% -20.4%$31.04 147,589 5.6% 0.4%
2011 91 -0.8% -21.2%$30.71 135,819 5.1% -1.1%
2010 91 -3.2% -20.6%$30.95 164,638 6.2% 2.3%
2009 94 -5.5% -18.0%$31.97 103,288 3.9% -0.4%
10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 38 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Retail
OVERALL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 181- $441.83 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 178- $435.39 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 174- $423.77 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 165- $403.08 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 160- $391.04 5.4%
YTD $3.1B1,167 2.2% $329.01$2,813,402 1595.1% $389.45 5.4% 2020 $4B1,145 2.2% $407.60$3,627,578 1595.2% $387.07 5.4% 2019 $4.8B1,877 3.1% $440.54$3,573,936 1595.2% $389.11 5.4% 2018 $4.9B2,671 6.2% $432.24$3,245,611 1545.0% $375.35 5.4% 2017 $3.8B3,036 4.6% $346.28$2,724,889 1505.1% $365.73 5.4% 2016 $4.7B2,503 4.3% $339.59$2,929,488 1455.4% $353.19 5.4% 2015 $5.4B2,846 4.9% $353.78$3,067,711 1385.7% $337.21 5.5% 2014 $5.1B2,597 5.6% $290.62$2,967,544 1276.0% $308.97 5.8% 2013 $4B2,144 4.2% $289.17$2,823,282 1096.3% $267.29 6.2% 2012 $2.8B1,803 3.7% $269.80$2,807,081 1046.9% $252.85 6.3% 2011 $1.8B1,538 2.9% $267.19$2,326,509 947.0% $229.88 6.7% 2010 $1.5B972 2.3% $210.06$2,105,279 897.4% $216.93 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
MALLS SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 169- $424.33 5.3%
2024 -- - -- 166- $418.78 5.3%
2023 -- - -- 162- $408.22 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 155- $388.90 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 150- $377.96 5.3%
YTD $264.4M18 4.3% $141.96$14,689,260 150- $376.60 5.3% 2020 $581.6M3 1.6% $824.21$193,850,405 1508.9% $377.90 5.3% 2019 $325M1 1.1% $701.94$325,000,000 152- $381.46 5.2%
2018 $227.9M61 29.2% $334.30$32,560,714 1456.7% $365.24 5.3% 2017 $64M12 1.4% $152.39$9,141,201 1446.5% $361.56 5.2% 2016 $285M35 6.5% $197.84$15,831,553 1405.2% $351.02 5.3% 2015 $332.1M67 6.3% $333.64$25,546,457 1345.2% $337.30 5.3% 2014 $111.9M62 7.0% $109.42$15,980,516 125- $313.41 5.5% 2013 $842M25 8.3% $309.01$42,100,671 1085.2% $272.46 5.9% 2012 $217.9M23 4.9% $379.75$14,529,033 1036.9% $258.33 6.0% 2011 $4.3M5 0.3% $160.34$1,441,667 949.3% $237.19 6.3%
2010 $6.3M7 0.3% $199.54$1,260,000 906.8% $225.37 6.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 39 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Retail
POWER CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 189- $396.95 5.3%
2024 -- - -- 186- $390.73 5.3%
2023 -- - -- 181- $379.86 5.2%
2022 -- - -- 172- $361 5.2%
2021 -- - -- 166- $349.92 5.3%
YTD $27.4M5 0.7% $159.59$5,475,000 166- $348.42 5.3%
2020 $61.8M6 1.0% $321.61$12,359,519 1636.6% $342.74 5.3% 2019 $259.2M28 5.7% $239.09$11,270,435 1645.7% $344.76 5.2% 2018 $396M39 5.1% $325.76$10,153,534 1555.7% $326.43 5.3% 2017 $14.9M36 5.6% $425.98$3,736,500 1525.4% $319.91 5.3% 2016 $53.7M37 2.8% $273.31$6,708,441 1485.6% $310.61 5.3% 2015 $284.5M22 3.7% $515.64$20,324,286 1426.3% $298.35 5.4% 2014 $566.5M66 13.8% $290.42$15,310,390 1286.0% $268.38 5.7% 2013 $107M49 3.8% $178.31$2,971,620 1116.8% $234.11 6.1% 2012 $197.3M26 5.5% $207.38$14,089,474 1057.2% $220.91 6.3% 2011 $5.6M20 4.7% $202.95$5,572,055 95- $198.90 6.6%
2010 $113.7M19 5.6% $123.34$7,106,875 898.8% $187.58 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 178- $380.50 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 176- $375.14 5.5%
2023 -- - -- 171- $365.32 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 163- $347.82 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 158- $337.87 5.5%
YTD $339.3M64 1.1% $352.86$7,069,727 1585.3% $336.63 5.5% 2020 $547.6M92 1.8% $306$6,080,150 1575.6% $334.75 5.4% 2019 $711.7M115 1.9% $378.23$7,286,648 1585.7% $337.30 5.4% 2018 $618M116 2.2% $323.42$6,179,851 1535.7% $325.52 5.5% 2017 $800.8M161 3.7% $290.52$7,024,445 1485.5% $316.21 5.5% 2016 $1B135 3.4% $326.08$8,725,931 1445.2% $306.19 5.5% 2015 $1.2B179 3.9% $322.62$7,178,981 1376.2% $292.57 5.6% 2014 $920.7M172 4.0% $265.86$6,325,229 1265.7% $268.70 5.8% 2013 $802.6M152 3.8% $249.92$6,310,619 1106.4% $233.79 6.2% 2012 $676.3M164 3.7% $248.20$5,932,642 1046.6% $221.63 6.4% 2011 $529.9M139 3.2% $329.22$7,515,725 946.9% $201.47 6.7% 2010 $346.9M88 2.1% $205.83$5,058,591 897.5% $190.39 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 40 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Retail
STRIP CENTER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 181- $434.63 5.5%
2024 -- - -- 179- $428.28 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 174- $416.82 5.4%
2022 -- - -- 165- $396.56 5.4%
2021 -- - -- 160- $384.99 5.4%
YTD $202.8M59 1.5% $376.52$3,612,858 1604.9% $383.50 5.5% 2020 $161.5M50 1.3% $356.67$3,351,263 1585.1% $379.32 5.4% 2019 $315.5M118 2.3% $429.71$3,411,341 1584.8% $379.82 5.4% 2018 $325.7M151 3.4% $375.25$3,298,059 1535.2% $367.27 5.5% 2017 $319M224 4.4% $349.22$2,900,095 1495.7% $357.59 5.5% 2016 $292.9M130 2.7% $331.29$2,746,309 1445.6% $345.15 5.5% 2015 $370.5M179 4.1% $307.07$2,938,042 1375.8% $329.24 5.6% 2014 $331.8M147 3.2% $323.88$2,765,326 1265.6% $301.63 5.8% 2013 $231.4M146 3.5% $240.04$2,117,831 1096.4% $260.96 6.2% 2012 $121.4M91 2.0% $260.78$2,167,524 1037.2% $247.70 6.4% 2011 $112.9M80 2.4% $190.22$2,204,269 947.3% $224.84 6.7% 2010 $77.6M63 1.5% $227.14$1,988,773 887.5% $212.13 7.0% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred.
GENERAL RETAIL SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 184- $477.78 5.4%
2024 -- - -- 181- $470.67 5.4%
2023 -- - -- 176- $457.96 5.3%
2022 -- - -- 168- $435.36 5.3%
2021 -- - -- 162- $422.03 5.4%
YTD $2.3B1,020 2.5% $383.75$2,330,495 1625.1% $420.21 5.4% 2020 $2.6B988 2.7% $415.74$2,751,775 1615.1% $417.29 5.4% 2019 $3.2B1,614 3.8% $473.38$2,828,689 1615.2% $419.06 5.3% 2018 $3.4B2,302 4.4% $499.67$2,638,609 1564.8% $405.19 5.4% 2017 $2.6B2,601 5.4% $379.48$2,245,179 1524.9% $393.68 5.4% 2016 $3.1B2,164 4.8% $372.17$2,237,662 1465.4% $379.34 5.4% 2015 $3.1B2,394 5.1% $365.38$2,144,466 1395.6% $361.57 5.5% 2014 $3.1B2,145 5.7% $314.27$2,243,802 1276.1% $330.40 5.8% 2013 $2B1,759 3.8% $318.03$1,793,108 1106.3% $284.80 6.2% 2012 $1.5B1,494 3.6% $270.97$1,874,249 1046.8% $269.03 6.3% 2011 $1.1B1,283 3.1% $256.08$1,769,307 947.0% $244.20 6.7% 2010 $919.8M793 2.5% $230.40$1,618,552 897.3% $230.08 6.9% (1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 41 Sale Trends
Los Angeles Retail
OTHER SALES
Completed Transactions (1)
Turnover Avg Price/SFDeals VolumeYear
Market Pricing Trends (2)
Avg Price Price IndexAvg Cap Rate Price/SF Cap Rate
2025 -- - -- 127- $346.54 6.1%
2024 -- - -- 125- $341.42 6.1%
2023 -- - -- 122- $332.22 6.0%
2022 -- - -- 116- $316.29 6.0%
2021 -- - -- 113- $307.35 6.1%
YTD $01 6.2% -- 112- $306.33 6.1%
2020 $37.2M6 14.4% $94.04$6,206,094 121- $329.16 5.9%
2019 $300K1 0% $306.12- 122- $332.19 5.8%
2018 $2.8M2 0.4% $292.42$2,780,000 115- $314.73 5.9%
2017 $02 0.7% -- 126- $342.62 5.7%
2016 $570K2 0.1% $276.56- 1215.8% $330.95 5.7%
2015 $134.1M5 14.2% $357.32$66,358,335 1165.8% $315.90 5.8% 2014 $3.6M5 0.4% $313.14$2,213,000 117- $319.77 5.7%
2013 $4.6M13 0.5% $316.09- 102- $277.87 6.1%
2012 $100M5 6.6% $570.19$98,850,000 966.0% $263.35 6.3% 2011 $4.2M11 3.9% $256.82$1,360,000 95- $260.40 6.4%
2010 $605K2 0.1% $583.41- 90- $245.60 6.6%
(1) Completed transaction data is based on actual arms-length sales transactions and levels are dependent on the mix of what happened to sell in the period. (2) Market price trends data is based on the estimated price movement of all properties in the market, informed by actual transactions that have occurred. 10/8/2021
Copyrighted report licensed to City of Long Beach - 853470 Page 42
Appendix C-3 7
Appendix C-3: Table of Sites Under PlaceTypes.............................C-3-1 Appendix C-37
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 3
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
Appendix C-3: Additional Data on Inventory Sites under PlaceType Scenario The
following table lists the sites selected in the site inventory under the PlaceTypes scenario and provides detailed information about each site, including existing use, lot coverage and land-to-improvement value. The table represents sites that met the criteria outlined in the methodology at the time the analy
sis was conducted. The projected housing needs for extremely low income households are estimat
ed at 50 percent of the very low income RHNA. However, for purposes of identifying sites for RHNA, no separate sites inventory is requir
ed for extremely low income housing needs.
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 4
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7261007028 0.2 223 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.22 38% 0 Commercial Store 1600 1/2
CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7209008012 0.13 249 0.26 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 9 N/A Market 0.32 43% 2 Residential Duplex 342 1/2 E 19TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7281019021 0.03 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 4 0 0 4 Planned Development PD-30 150 5 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 417 1/4 E 1ST ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7275001083 0.52 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 73 7 0 66 Planned Development PD-30 150 78 Market Market 0.01 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
300 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH
CA LONG
BEACH CA
7274023024 0.14 328 0.3 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 21 Market Market 0.50 39% 1 Residential Single Family 853 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274023022 0.16 328 0.3 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.32 29% 1 Residential Single Family 861 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7275002025 0.31 500 0.31 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 43 4 0 39 Planned Development PD-30 150 47 Market Market 0.13 33% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
210 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7274006023 0.3 371 0.3 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 14 0 3 11 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 7 N/A Market 0.82 69% 1 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1217
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267005012 0.19 346 0.37 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.43 52% 3 Residential Three Units 1054
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268030013 0.15 220 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.67 48% 1 Industrial Light
Manufacturing
1708
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268019024 0.46 391 0.46 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 21 0 4 17 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 10 N/A Market 0.50 53% 1 Industrial
Warehousing,
Distribution,
Storage
1480
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7266005001 0.12 329 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 17 2 0 15 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.56 32% 2 Residential Duplex 744 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 5
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7265001037 0.34 498 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.26 24% 0 Commercial Service Station 200 ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7274023018 0.19 327 0.35 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 8 1 0 7 Planned Development PD-30 150 29 Market Market 0.42 64% 7 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
905 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274023016 0.16 327 0.35 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 6 1 0 5 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
919 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7266006040 0.14 522 0.53 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 20 2 0 18 Planned Development PD-30 150 21 Market Market 0.45 77% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
638 ALAMITOS
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7268019018 0.13 392 0.38 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.23 48% 1 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1404
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267005010 0.18 346 0.37 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.29 26% 1 Residential Single Family 1060
ALAMITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7266015016 0.16 527 0.31 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.21 29% 1 Residential Single Family 468 ALMOND AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7148013035 0.14 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3385
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7274013032 0.47 352 0.75 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 47 47 0 0 Commercial CO 22 10 N/A Market 0.06 35% 5 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1078
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH
CA LONG
BEACH CA
7274001018 0.18 358 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 9% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1225
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274015041 0.18 339 0.79 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 937 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7130022041 0.65 96 0.65 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 10% 1 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
5146
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 6
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7115002004 0.78 622 0.78 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 54 54 0 0 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 17% 1 Commercial Service Station,
Car Wash,
Convenience
Store
6685
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115026038 0.6 630 0.6 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 35% 7 Commercial Store 6580
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7211001006 0.15 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.64 30% 0 Residential Single Family 2546
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7135013053 3.28 104 3.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 226 226 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.76 36% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4570
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7208006057 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2545
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7281007028 0.23 513 0.52 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 32 3 0 29 Planned Development PD-30 150 35 Market Market 0.91 32% 0 Commercial Store 401 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7138017022 0.31 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 12 12 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 35% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3900
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7274013030 0.28 352 0.75 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 28 28 0 0 Commercial CO 22 6 N/A Market 0.25 48% 1 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
1066
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274016007 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.22 42% 1 Residential Single Family 847 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7210016904 0.34 241 0.57 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 34 34 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 31% 0 Commercial Store 1858
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7269031021 0.16 395 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 12 0 2 10 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.81 67% 1 Commercial Small Food
Store, Less Than
6,000 SF
1473
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7208007008 0.23 117 0.58 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 14 14 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.29 72% 0 Commercial Store 2485
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7130002034 0.72 99 0.95 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 32 32 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 15% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5361
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 7
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7281007029 0.17 513 0.52 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.72 50% 0 Commercial Office Building 417 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7138030015 0.44 47 0.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 17% 2 Commercial Store 3850
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7209004023 0.13 251 0.26 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.30 29% 0 Commercial Office Building 1909
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7138017023 0.29 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 11 11 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.62 54% 1 Commercial Store 3908
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7209004022 0.13 251 0.26 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.82 70% 1 Commercial
Office Building,
Office And
Residential
1901
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7139001018 0.54 111 0.54 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 20 20 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.09 21% 0 Commercial Service Station 4385
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7208007026 0.26 116 0.26 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 12 0 2 10 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.62 47% 0 Commercial Professional Building
2403
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7139002030 0.28 114 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.72 30% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
4101
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7139003002 0.19 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 7 7 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.51 55% 0 Commercial Store 4019
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7269031017 0.16 396 0.29 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 12 0 2 10 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.00 25% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1491
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7145019014 0.5 34 1.16 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 34 34 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 10% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3402
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7274015900 0.34 340 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 14 1 0 13 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.00 80% 0 Commercial Office Building 999 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7138031024 0.73 45 0.73 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 27 27 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.65 32% 0 Commercial Bank, Savings & Loan
3804
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7269031018 0.13 396 0.29 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.87 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1487
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 8
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7148013038 0.54 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 37 37 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.14 36% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3301
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7116018023 0.6 676 0.6 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
6935
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7127006036 0.29 652 0.29 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.08 31% 0 Commercial Service Station 5738
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7130006043 0.33 98 0.33 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 5205
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7210016027 0.23 241 0.57 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.92 66% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
1870
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7139004004 0.38 46 0.38 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.53 49% 0 Commercial Store 3839
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7211001005 0.14 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 21 21 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 39% 1 Residential Single Family 2556
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7138017019 0.28 48 0.88 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 11 11 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 50% 0 Commercial Store 3918
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7274016008 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.45 18% 1 Residential Single Family 835 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7209006022 0.13 244 0.48 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.09 64% 0 Residential Duplex 1825
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7148013036 0.16 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.10 40% 0 Commercial Office Building 3355
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7210009027 0.14 250 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1934
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7139003003 0.37 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 14 14 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.84 58% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
4001
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7139003004 0.37 51 0.93 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 14 14 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 53% 0 Institutional School (Private) 3981
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 9
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7130010017 1.07 95 1.63 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 47 47 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.69 47% 0 Commercial Store 5117
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7208006060 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2525
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7124017032 0.32 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 12 12 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.81 19% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5990
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7269031020 0.14 395 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.78 31% 1 Residential Single Family 1475
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7125034033 0.21 654 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5927
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7281006010 0.46 512 0.46 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 64 6 0 58 Planned Development PD-30 150 69 Market Market 0.07 20% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
402 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7139002031 1.68 113 1.68 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 63 63 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 36% 0 Commercial Store 4215
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7115027012 2.54 631 2.54 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 175 175 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 33% 5 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
6597
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7274015043 0.18 339 0.79 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 919 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7281002002 0.34 517 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.54 23% 0 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
555 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7124001025 0.4 637 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 15 15 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 6108
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7139001030 0.56 112 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 21 21 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.55 40% 0 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
4335
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7130010018 0.56 95 1.63 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 25 25 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.47 36% 0 Commercial Wireless
Communication
Tower, Single
Story
5115
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 10
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7124017031 0.21 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 8 8 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 37% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
5966
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7124001021 0.12 635 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 57% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
6176
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7138016036 0.74 50 0.74 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 28 28 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.58 37% 6 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4040
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7274017014 0.11 331 0.28 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 4 0 0 4 Planned Development PD-30 150 17 Market Market 0.11 66% 0 Institutional School (Private) 753 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7148013034 0.41 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 43% 0 Commercial Store 3395
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7208006058 0.11 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 17 17 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2535
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7139001900 0.19 112 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 7 7 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 6% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
4325
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7269032906 0.55 398 0.55 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 55 55 0 0 Institutional I 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 14% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1535
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274016035 0.17 334 0.51 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.90 63% 0 Commercial Office Building 853 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7125034032 0.11 654 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 3 0 1 2 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Residential Vacant Land 5941
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7274013008 0.14 341 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 0 2 8 Commercial CO 22 3 N/A Market 0.19 62% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1036
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7124017033 0.11 660 0.64 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 4 4 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5960
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7274018049 0.34 520 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 48 5 0 43 Planned Development PD-30 150 51 Market Market 0.33 37% 0 Institutional Mortuary, Funeral Home
638 ATLANTIC
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 11
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7130025031 0.4 101 0.4 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.88 47% 0 Institutional School (Private) 5350
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7274017030 0.17 330 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.70 44% 3 Residential Duplex 728 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7211001004 0.15 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2560
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7274017015 0.17 331 0.28 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.52 45% 0 Commercial Office Building 741 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7210009011 0.28 250 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 20 0 4 16 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 60% 0 Commercial Professional Building
1954
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7127020012 0.46 646 0.72 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 20 20 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 22% 0 Commercial Auto Service
Centers, No
Gasoline
5400
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7208006061 0.1 121 0.54 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 15 15 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2515
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7148012033 0.26 33 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.13 29% 1 Commercial Service Station 3390
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7148013037 0.36 28 1.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 25 25 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 42% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3333
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7125035032 0.35 661 0.35 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 42% 2 Commercial Store 6001
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7127009005 0.2 648 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 47% 2 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
5574
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7127009035 0.1 648 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 3 0 1 2 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 5564
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7208007027 0.35 117 0.58 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 22 22 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.48 26% 0 Commercial Store 2467
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 12
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7124001024 0.35 637 0.75 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 13 13 0 0 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.14 16% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
6142
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7274017028 0.17 330 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.28 27% 1 Residential Single Family 740 ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7124001022 0.25 635 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNA 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 23% 0 Commercial Store 6184
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7148013033 0.59 26 1.18 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
3301
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7211001003 0.29 118 0.73 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 44 44 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.73 49% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
2572
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7210016028 0.11 241 0.8 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 11 11 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
1884
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7210016029 0.12 241 0.8 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 100 12 12 0 0 Planned
Development PD-25 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
1890
ATLANTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7313033018 0.16 144 0.43 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.82 24% 1 Residential Single Family 2629 BALTIC AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90810
7254008023 0.14 304 0.41 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.84 45% 1 Residential Single Family 1067
BELMONT AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7254008022 0.14 304 0.41 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.25 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1065
BELMONT AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7269036024 0.17 196 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.52 27% 2 Residential Duplex 1709 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269001031 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1724 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269042020 0.14 431 0.28 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 3 N/A Market 0.55 41% 2 Residential Duplex 1335 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 13
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269042019 0.14 431 0.28 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 3 N/A Market 0.50 37% 2 Residential Duplex 1339 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269036003 0.17 195 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.25 21% 1 Residential Single Family 1777 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7205003004 0.15 131 0.54 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 6 6 0 0 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.16 14% 1 Residential Single Family 2575 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7269001032 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1720 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269001030 0.18 192 0.92 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 11 11 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.02 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 1726 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269036023 0.17 196 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.25 18% 1 Residential Single Family 1719 CEDAR AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268027027 0.12 218 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.28 38% 1 Residential Single Family 1736
CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7275005004 0.13 505 0.27 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.27 52% 1 Residential Single Family 332 CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7265003011 0.12 488 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.47 31% 1 Residential Single Family 27 CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7268027005 0.15 214 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.53 44% 2 Residential Duplex 1776
CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7275005005 0.14 505 0.27 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.98 49% 2 Residential Duplex 326 CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7268027002 0.15 214 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.57 75% 0 Commercial Store 1782
CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268027013 0.15 218 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 2 N/A Market 0.77 28% 1 Residential Single Family 1742
CERRITOS AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7147026017 0.9 25 0.9 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 34 34 0 0 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 5 N/A Market 0.31 50% 0 Commercial
Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3431 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH
LO 0
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 14
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7129030016 0.512114 680 0.512114 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 5 0 0 5 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 30% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5003 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7261005007 0.31 221 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.28 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1701 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7128032019 0.14 644 0.38 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.73 55% 1 Commercial Store 5449 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7216032025 0.13 238 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.29 30% 1 Residential Single Family 1845 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7114020037 0.14 634 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.12 12% 1 Commercial Store 6395 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7262024012 0.15 326 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 35% 1 Residential Single Family, Spa
754 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261032008 0.15 374 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 49% 2 Residential Duplex 1132 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261017025 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.67 29% 1 Residential Single Family 1437 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7114020039 0.15 634 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.31 36% 1 Residential Single Family 6377 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114018052 0.52 632 0.52 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 20 20 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 47% 1 Institutional Church 6465 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7123013042 0.33 659 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.54 24% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
5925 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7261032007 0.15 374 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.11 38% 1 Residential Single Family 1134 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261008024 0.14 389 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.59 32% 1 Residential Single Family 1505 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7116006047 0.25 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 17 17 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 34% 1 Residential Single Family 6821 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 15
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7152001016 3.7 94 4.2 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 254 254 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.49 33% 0 Commercial Store 4700 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7261008020 0.14 222 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.41 22% 1 Residential Single Family 1535 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7275019030 0.23 490 0.35 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 10 0 2 8 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.57 58% 0 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
245 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7157015017 0.96 643 20.77 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 48 0 10 38 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 10% 1 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
5540 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7119014035 0.46 639 0.46 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.24 26% 1 Industrial Light Manufacturing
6242 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7267015015 0.15 322 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 935 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267014019 0.15 323 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.59 26% 1 Residential Single Family 1035 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7128031001 0.12 645 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.46 33% 0 Commercial Store 5519 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7263007001 0.14 492 0.33 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.52 51% 2 Residential Duplex, Pool 294 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7157015025 10.21 643 20.77 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 511 0 103 408 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.78 27% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
5450 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7128032001 0.24 644 0.38 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 12 0 2 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 70% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
5465 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7261007029 0.2 223 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.07 34% 0 Industrial Light Manufacturing
1600 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7216032023 0.13 238 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.62 59% 1 Commercial Store 1835 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7119018900 0.41 658 0.93 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 58% 0 Commercial Office Building, 2 Stories
5898 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 16
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7261017031 0.14 387 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.44 52% 1 Commercial Store 1403 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261017030 0.14 387 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 66% 0 Commercial Store 1409 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7116007053 0.4 621 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 20 0 4 16 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 17% 1 Commercial Store 6701 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7261017024 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.79 68% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1441 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7262008020 0.13 324 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 1 N/A Market 0.25 23% 1 Residential Single Family 1040 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7116006048 0.59 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 46% 1 Industrial Warehousing,
Distribution,
10,000 to 24,999
SF
6825 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7116006046 0.35 678 1.19 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 24 24 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 13% 1 Residential Single Family 6819 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7118013004 0.26 638 0.26 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.75 17% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
6193 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7267014018 0.15 323 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.44 42% 2 Residential Duplex 1043 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7262024010 0.15 326 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.36 48% 2 Residential Duplex 760 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7128031030 0.31 645 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.79 61% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
5531 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7129003029 0.52 102 0.52 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 36 36 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.33 31% 1 Commercial Store 5365 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7262008021 0.13 324 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 1 N/A Market 0.30 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1048 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 17
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7119001004 0.34 633 0.34 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 47% 0 Commercial Office Building 6510 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7261017026 0.14 388 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.06 9% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1433 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261008023 0.14 389 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.34 40% 1 Residential Single Family 1519 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7129010028 0.249913 679 0.249913 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-4-N 22 5 N/A Market 0.31 27% 1 Industrial Open Storage,
Contractor
Storage Yard
5229 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7137012011 0.511414 681 0.511414 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 6 0 0 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 1.94 21% 0 Institutional Church 4103 CHERRY AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7137013006 0.643798 684 0.643798 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 9 0 0 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.57 12% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
4001 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7137025027 0.29791 686 0.29791 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-1-N 5 2 N/A Market 0.04 29% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3801 CHERRY
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7269038026 0.17 197 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.82 31% 2 Residential Duplex 1607
CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7206026010 0.15 130 0.46 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.69 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2620
CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7269039010 0.86 403 0.86 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 54 54 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 19 N/A Market 0.84 23% 1 Institutional Homes For Aged & Others
1548
CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7280012005 0.24 479 0.48 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.22 33% 10 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
445 CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7269038025 0.17 197 0.34 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-N 22 4 N/A Market 0.48 30% 2 Residential Duplex 1615
CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7280012007 0.24 479 0.48 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.00 10% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
437 CHESTNUT
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 18
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7180020003 0.359049 704 0.359049 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 4 0 0 4 Residential R-1-N 5 2 N/A Market 2.95 21% 1 Residential Single Family 4344 CLARK AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90808
7258022028 0.18 565 0.67 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 8 8 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.27 43% 2 Residential Duplex 720
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7257013004 0.15 549 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 40% 1 Residential Single Family 391
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7258022006 0.15 315 0.3 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.14 29% 1 Residential Single Family 776
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258028005 0.17 563 1.02 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 7 7 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 3 N/A Market 0.31 42% 2 Residential Duplex 675
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7120016032 0.15 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.67 44% 1 Residential Single Family 6681
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7257019014 0.15 581 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.26 34% 1 Residential Single Family 324
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7257013007 0.15 549 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.56 50% 1 Residential Duplex 387
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7257014012 0.15 548 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.71 43% 1 Residential Single Family 374
CORONADO
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7262027016 0.33 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 23 23 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.38 4% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
600 DAWSON
AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7262027003 0.14 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.47 4% 0 Residential Duplex 620 DAWSON AVE
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7273007023 0.18 443 0.36 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 31 3 0 28 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.03 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 233 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7258001025 0.3 317 0.3 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.95 58% 0 Institutional Church 2841 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274022001 0.26 344 0.26 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 39 Market Market 0.02 42% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
900 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 19
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7254017013 1.77 308 1.77 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 66 66 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 19 N/A Market 0.55 15% 0 Commercial Nursery Or Greenhouse
3842 E 10TH
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274023008 0.17 343 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 2% 0 Residential Four Units, Vacant Land
1020 E 10TH
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274023007 0.17 343 0.34 DT 38 Feet Downtown 40 7 1 0 6 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.25 28% 1 Residential Single Family 1028 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7273007038 0.12 444 0.27 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 20 2 0 18 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.43 64% 6 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
201 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7273011002 0.17 449 0.46 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 29 3 0 26 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 42% 5 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
322 E 10TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7273007024 0.18 443 0.36 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 31 3 0 28 Planned Development PD-30 150 27 Market Market 0.92 47% 4 Residential Four Units 223 E 10TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267015014 0.15 322 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.16 29% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1942 E 10TH
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7241012140 0.69 305 0.82 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 26 26 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 8 N/A Market 0.56 27% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
4313 E 10TH
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274007013 0.16 348 0.32 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.44 60% 2 Residential Duplex 1027 E 11TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274007037 0.16 348 0.32 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.44 59% 2 Residential Duplex 1019 E 11TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269030014 0.28 361 0.44 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 20 0 4 16 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 3 N/A Market 0.42 30% 1 Residential Single Family 505 E 14TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259006048 0.15 272 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.38 44% 2 Residential Duplex 3515 E 15TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259006047 0.16 272 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.90 49% 2 Residential Duplex 3507 E 15TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 20
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269022016 0.14 204 0.28 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.31 35% 1 Residential Single Family 415 E 16TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269022018 0.14 204 0.28 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.48 45% 1 Residential Single Family 419 E 16TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269021014 0.15 205 0.3 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.25 19% 1 Residential Single Family 345 E 17TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268030016 0.15 220 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.87 19% 1 Residential Single Family 1225 E 17TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269021042 0.15 205 0.3 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.25 34% 1 Residential Single Family 351 E 17TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7209008010 0.13 249 0.26 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 9 N/A Market 0.65 33% 2 Residential Duplex 340 E 19TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7216012001 0.57 239 0.57 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 39 39 0 0 Planned
Development PD-22 40 23 N/A Affordable 0.33 50% 0 Industrial Warehousing,
Distribution,
Storage
1851 E 19TH
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7281019019 0.2 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 28 3 0 25 Planned Development PD-30 150 30 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 401 E 1ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7265003008 0.19 488 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 4 N/A Market 0.44 40% 2 Residential Duplex 1054 E 1ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7256003004 0.13 602 0.39 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 56% 1 Residential Single Family 3712 E 1ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7256003003 0.13 602 0.39 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 6 0 1 5 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 63% 1 Residential Single Family 3702 E 1ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7281019020 0.09 494 0.32 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 13 1 0 12 Planned Development PD-30 150 14 Market Market 0.00 7% 0 Residential Vacant Land 417 E 1ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7209010006 0.14 253 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.68 42% 1 Residential Single Family 344 E 20TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7209010007 0.14 253 0.28 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 10 1 0 9 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 408 E 20TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 21
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7208005019 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.37 42% 1 Residential Single Family 544 E 25TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7208002010 0.15 155 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.65 37% 1 Residential Single Family 233 E 25TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7208002008 0.15 155 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.28 32% 1 Residential Single Family 227 E 25TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7208005018 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.54 46% 1 Residential Single Family 540 E 25TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7208005020 0.12 119 0.36 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.76 25% 1 Residential Single Family 550 E 25TH WAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206023012 0.15 24 0.31 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.16 38% 1 Residential Single Family 204 E 29TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206023011 0.16 24 0.31 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 12 1 0 11 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Market 0.52 34% 1 Residential Single Family 162 E 29TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7243013035 0.28 597 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.39 39% 0 Commercial Store 5700 E 2ND ST LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7265020025 0.12 489 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.32 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1821 E 2ND ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7265020028 0.12 489 0.31 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 42% 1 Residential Single Family 1831 E 2ND ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7206010009 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.55 47% 1 Residential Single Family 114 E 31ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7206011013 0.14 14 0.28 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.62 40% 1 Residential Single Family 222 E 31ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7206010010 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.46 37% 1 Residential Single Family 116 E 31ST ST LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7206010008 0.14 17 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.57 49% 2 Residential Duplex 112 E 31ST ST 000B
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 22
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7206011014 0.14 14 0.28 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.47 40% 2 Residential Duplex 226 E 31ST ST A
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7263007004 0.19 492 0.33 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 45 9 0 2 7 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.43 44% 2 Residential Duplex 2016 E 3RD ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7280017009 0.17 473 1.92 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 29 29 0 0 Planned
Development PD-30 150 26 Affordable Affordable 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 119 E 3RD ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7255002007 0.3 552 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.67 27% 1 Commercial Service Station, Self Service 3601 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7263020010 0.15 536 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2429 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7263020009 0.15 536 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 39% 1 Residential Single Family 2425 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255037028 0.29 575 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.98 33% 2 Commercial Store 4337 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255014001 0.12 578 0.36 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.01 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 3800 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7266008015 0.42 508 0.54 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 59 6 0 53 Planned Development PD-30 150 63 Market Market 0.20 35% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
901 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7257008015 0.15 557 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.86 36% 1 Commercial Store 2805 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7263023024 0.27 556 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.65 43% 0 Commercial Store 2741 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7257008023 0.15 555 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 26% 1 Residential Single Family 2919 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7275016050 0.4 539 0.4 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 12 0 2 10 Commercial CNR 11 4 N/A Market 0.10 68% 0 Commercial Store 1800 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7275001021 0.26 506 0.26 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 36 4 0 32 Planned Development PD-30 150 39 Market Market 0.05 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 1030 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 23
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7257008022 0.15 555 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.80 51% 1 Residential Single Family, Over 20 Stories 2909 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7257016027 0.48 545 0.63 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 18 18 0 0 Institutional I 0 0 N/A Market 0.77 40% 1 Commercial Office Building 3540 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7266026045 0.44 537 0.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNR 11 5 N/A Market 0.57 37% 4 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
1949 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7275001002 0.24 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 34 3 0 31 Planned Development PD-30 150 36 Market Market 0.52 28% 0 Commercial Miscellaneous commercial 912 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7255003007 0.14 544 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 3646 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7266008021 0.16 509 0.33 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 22 2 0 20 Planned Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.06 93% 1 Commercial Service/Repair Shop, Laundry 965 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7257008016 0.15 557 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 38% 1 Residential Single Family 2811 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255003006 0.14 544 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.08 40% 1 Residential Single Family 3640 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255003021 0.14 543 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.15 26% 1 Residential Single Family 3708 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7257005019 0.15 554 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.81 36% 1 Residential Single Family 3027 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255036013 0.16 576 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.89 48% 1 Commercial
Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
4240 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7281011001 0.23 511 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 32 3 0 29 Planned Development PD-30 150 35 Market Market 0.01 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 600 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7263004001 0.37 540 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.21 18% 0 Institutional School (Private) 2000 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7266015023 0.19 538 0.31 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.60 18% 2 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
1327 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 24
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7255003020 0.14 543 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.30 51% 1 Residential Single Family 3714 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7255036015 0.16 576 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.12 23% 1 Residential Single Family 4300 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7266015024 0.12 538 0.31 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.01 10% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 1337 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7257005018 0.15 554 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-3-T 11 2 N/A Market 0.13 34% 1 Residential Single Family 3017 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7266008022 0.17 509 0.33 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.93 64% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge 975 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7275001001 0.07 507 0.83 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 10 1 0 9 Planned Development PD-30 150 11 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 900 E 4TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7255015017 0.15 577 0.27 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.24 20% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
3932 E 4TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90814
7281002041 0.17 515 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 0% 1 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 437 E 5TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281002010 0.17 516 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.40 26% 1 Residential Single Family 523 E 5TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7266007026 0.15 526 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.31 53% 5 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
1001 E 5TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7266007027 0.13 526 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 18 2 0 16 Planned Development PD-30 150 20 Market Market 0.94 48% 4 Residential Four Units 1011 E 5TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281002009 0.17 516 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.86 51% 7 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
509 E 5TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281002024 0.17 515 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.46 55% 5 Commercial Office Building,
Office And
Residential
425 E 5TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281005003 0.28 510 0.28 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 39 4 0 35 Planned Development PD-30 150 42 Market Market 0.08 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 832 E 5TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 25
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7121014001 0.25 640 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2800 E 63RD
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115002006 0.14 623 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.41 43% 1 Residential Single Family 570 E 67TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115002009 0.16 623 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Industrial IL 0 0 N/A Market 0.85 61% 2 Residential Duplex 590 E 67TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120016030 0.15 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.88 41% 1 Residential Single Family 3240 E 67TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120016031 0.14 617 0.44 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.77 50% 1 Residential Single Family 3230 E 67TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7266007008 0.15 525 0.3 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.19 36% 1 Residential Single Family 1028 E 6TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7274018039 0.17 521 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 70% 6 Residential Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
625 E 6TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7274018040 0.17 521 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 50% 3 Residential Three Units 633 E 6TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7266007007 0.15 525 0.3 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 21 2 0 19 Planned Development PD-30 150 23 Market Market 0.43 67% 4 Residential Four Units 1036 E 6TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7273020039 0.17 459 0.34 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 29 3 0 26 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 325 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH
LO 0
7262027002 0.16 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.45 4% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 2212 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7262021011 0.27 535 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.20 17% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
2337 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7241015031 0.3 571 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.94 45% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
4400 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 26
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7254021013 0.14 569 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.48 34% 1 Residential Single Family 4017 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7266017071 0.41 530 0.41 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 20 0 4 16 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.46 18% 0 Commercial Professional Building 1500 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274017033 0.17 518 0.4 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.67 52% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
617 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7258028004 0.14 563 1.02 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.00 1% 1 Institutional Church, Church Parking Lot 3222 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258031014 0.16 561 0.32 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.67 38% 2 Commercial Office Building,
Office And
Residential
2926 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274017034 0.17 519 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.38 49% 6 Commercial Office Building,
Office And
Residential
623 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7258031013 0.16 561 0.32 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.72 29% 2 Residential Duplex 2918 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258028001 0.12 563 1.02 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 8 8 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Institutional Church, Church Parking Lot 3250 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258017026 0.32 560 0.32 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 16 0 3 13 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.78 43% 4 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
2801 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258028028 0.59 563 1.02 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-3-S 16 10 N/A Market 0.45 67% 2 Institutional Church 3200 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7266003033 0.37 524 0.37 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 18 0 4 14 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.04 14% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge 1155 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267030004 0.14 533 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 28% 1 Residential Single Family 1829 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7254021012 0.23 569 0.37 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.22 38% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
4001 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 27
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7241002040 0.27 572 0.27 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Planned
Development PD-22 40 11 N/A Market 0.99 55% 0 Recreational Theater, Wireless
Communication
Tower
4350 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7262017025 0.15 559 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.26 34% 1 Residential Single Family 2717 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7266001034 0.45 532 0.45 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 14 0 3 11 Commercial CNR 11 5 N/A Market 0.55 10% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1577 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7241018032 0.38 574 0.38 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.85 25% 3 Commercial Store 4740 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7258021005 0.28 564 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 14 0 3 11 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.15 42% 0 Commercial Service Station 3201 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7241016025 0.42 573 0.42 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.79 33% 1 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
4540 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274017035 0.17 519 0.34 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 24 2 0 22 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.42 64% 4 Residential Four Units 633 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267030005 0.17 533 0.31 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.71 41% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge 1837 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7258022021 0.17 565 0.67 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 12 12 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 1 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 3303 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7262032001 0.2 558 0.32 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.53 26% 1 Commercial Store 2700 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274017045 0.23 518 0.4 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 32 3 0 29 Planned Development PD-30 150 35 Market Market 0.68 32% 1 Commercial Service/Repair Shop, Laundry 601 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7273020024 0.17 459 0.34 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 29 3 0 26 Planned Development PD-30 150 26 Market Market 0.13 31% 3 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
337 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7258027103 0.54 562 0.69 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 37 37 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 6 N/A Market 0.82 39% 0 Commercial Store 3322 E 7TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 28
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7266006042 0.39 522 0.53 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 55 5 0 50 Planned Development PD-30 150 59 Market Market 0.73 27% 0 Recreational Athletic And
Amusement
Facility
1020 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7262017024 0.15 559 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.84 40% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
2709 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7262027001 0.16 534 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.46 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use 2200 E 7TH ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7273017020 0.07 333 0.47 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 12 1 0 11 Planned Development PD-30 150 11 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Residential Vacant Land 345 E 8TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7273011021 0.13 451 0.59 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 22 2 0 20 Planned Development PD-30 150 20 Market Market 0.20 17% 1 Residential Single Family 327 E 9TH ST LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7240011006 0.69 593 0.69 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 26 26 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 15 N/A Market 0.48 49% 20 Residential
Five Or More
Apartments Or
Units
5124 E
ANAHEIM RD
LONG
BEACH CA
90815
7254004033 0.25 298 0.25 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 12 0 2 10 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.09 30% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3942 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH
CA LONG
BEACH CA
7253025035 0.32 302 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 22 22 0 0 Commercial CCN 22 7 N/A Market 0.48 36% 0 Commercial Store 4127 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH
LO 0
7261031001 0.14 373 0.67 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 54% 0 Commercial Store 1942 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261022015 0.34 379 0.49 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 17 0 3 14 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.89 65% 2 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
2041 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7269014008 0.17 416 0.34 TOD-M Over 5
stories Market 108 18 2 0 16 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 14 N/A Market 0.03 17% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
131 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259014022 0.15 293 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 66% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3522 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253010033 0.24 300 0.45 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 12 0 2 10 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.84 78% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3909 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 29
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7253028029 0.41 303 0.41 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 20 0 4 16 Commercial CCN 22 9 N/A Market 0.06 10% 0 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
4315 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259010031 0.19 277 1.14 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 13 13 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.22 59% 0 Commercial Store 3401 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253025026 0.32 302 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 22 22 0 0 Commercial CCN 22 7 N/A Market 0.67 37% 0 Commercial Store 4133 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7273004042 0.32 424 0.32 DT 150 Feet Downtown 170 54 5 0 49 Planned Development PD-30 150 48 Market Market 0.86 34% 0 Commercial Store 110 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259010083 0.95 277 1.14 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 65 65 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 33% 0 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
3411 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7254002001 0.17 294 0.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 12 12 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.47 59% 0 Commercial Store 3800 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261031005 0.13 373 0.67 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 9 9 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.58 66% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1908 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259021022 0.13 285 0.53 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 9 9 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.03 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2923 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253025020 0.16 301 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCN 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 53% 0 Commercial Store 4023 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261026012 0.14 384 0.52 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.13 25% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1731 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261031028 0.4 373 0.67 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.87 40% 0 Commercial Supermarket,
6,000 Through
11,999 SF
1934 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259015013 6.99 290 7.17 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 350 0 70 280 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.79 40% 3 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
3204 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 30
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7274003005 0.18 356 0.48 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 9 0 2 7 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.05 22% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
700 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261022014 0.15 379 0.49 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.12 14% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2021 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261026013 0.17 384 0.52 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 12 12 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.08 32% 0 Commercial Store 1733 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259019027 0.27 289 0.27 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.49 51% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
2888 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253009034 0.2 275 0.87 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 14 14 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.42 38% 0 Industrial Light Manufacturing
3701 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259016001 0.3 286 0.58 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 21 21 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.81 0% 0 Commercial Store 3102 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260030034 0.35 376 0.35 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 17 0 3 14 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 2436 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274001017 0.13 358 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 9 0 2 7 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 22% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 556 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259015012 0.18 290 7.17 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 9 0 2 7 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.68 45% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3300 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253010035 0.21 300 0.45 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.75 63% 0 Commercial Store 3925 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260026025 0.95 282 0.95 MFR-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 63 59 59 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 10 N/A Market 0.62 7% 0 Commercial
Auto, Car Wash
Only, Self
Service Type
2701 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253009010 0.67 275 0.87 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 29 29 0 0 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 7 N/A Market 0.32 14% 3 Commercial
Store And
Residential
Combination
3655 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7268040031 0.32 386 0.46 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 16 0 3 13 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.94 41% 4 Commercial Store 1569 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 31
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269029020 0.17 360 1.01 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 26 26 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 14 N/A Affordable 0.48 94% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
541 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7260027026 0.28 288 0.28 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.22 23% 0 Commercial Small Food
Store, Less Than
6,000 SF
2700 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274006004 0.16 369 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 61% 0 Commercial Store 1006 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259014001 0.15 293 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
3512 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259020013 0.13 284 0.66 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 9 9 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.22 1% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2809 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7268016047 0.21 363 0.33 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.82 24% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
1111 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259017002 0.15 287 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.52 55% 0 Commercial Store 2916 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274006003 0.16 369 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.05 22% 0 Commercial Store 1020 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7267003042 0.23 367 0.29 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 11 0 2 9 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.12 27% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1340 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268040024 0.14 386 0.46 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.19 27% 0 Residential Single Family 1525 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7254001016 0.59 295 0.59 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 41 41 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.01 25% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
3636 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259020015 0.27 284 0.66 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 19 19 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
2829 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7269029022 0.5 360 1.01 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 75 75 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 40 N/A Affordable 0.15 78% 0 Commercial Store 501 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 32
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7259013004 0.15 291 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 28% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3416 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259013003 0.13 291 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 39% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3408 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259008031 0.19 279 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 13 13 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.86 33% 0 Commercial Store 3201 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260021026 0.14 381 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 2215 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7267003002 0.21 368 0.49 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 10 0 2 8 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.94 55% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
1200 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7254002022 0.44 294 0.61 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 30 30 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.92 30% 2 Commercial Office Building 3720 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261026014 0.21 384 0.52 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 14 14 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.07 33% 0 Commercial Farm And
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1735 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259021015 0.4 285 0.53 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 28 28 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.16 34% 0 Commercial Store 2901 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261027009 0.4 385 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 20 0 4 16 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.57 56% 0 Commercial Store 1601 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259009036 0.75 278 0.91 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 52 52 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.74 39% 0 Commercial Store 3339 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260022028 0.28 382 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.13 37% 0 Commercial Store 2325 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259014011 0.33 293 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 23 23 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 64% 0 Industrial Light Manufacturing
3530 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7268016028 0.12 363 0.33 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.69 59% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1101 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 33
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269015018 0.34 415 0.51 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 51 51 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 27 N/A Affordable 0.06 96% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
233 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7253025019 0.16 301 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCN 22 3 N/A Market 0.25 48% 0 Commercial Store 4021 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7268017020 0.43 362 0.43 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 21 0 4 17 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.74 11% 0 Commercial Auto, Used
Car Sales And
Service
1155 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269029019 0.17 360 1.01 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 26 26 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 14 N/A Affordable 0.47 44% 0 Commercial Store 543 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7254004031 0.26 299 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.98 59% 0 Commercial Store 3922 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7253025031 0.47 301 0.79 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 32 32 0 0 Commercial CCN 22 10 N/A Market 0.28 11% 0 Commercial Restaurant,
Cocktail Lounge,
Fast Food-Auto
Oriented
4001 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274005001 0.3 370 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.98 38% 0 Commercial Store 900 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7274001016 0.11 358 0.42 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 8 0 2 6 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 33% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 550 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7261028003 0.3 372 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 15 0 3 12 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.93 27% 0 Commercial Store 1600 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259020014 0.13 284 0.66 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 9 9 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.58 33% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
2821 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7269028020 0.25 359 0.25 TOD-M Over 5
stories Market 108 27 3 0 24 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 20 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
437 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259013005 0.12 291 0.4 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 2% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3422 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274006002 0.16 369 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 6% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1024 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 34
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7260024014 0.26 383 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.15 94% 0 Commercial Store 2501 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7269029021 0.17 360 1.01 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 26 26 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 14 N/A Affordable 0.50 99% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
535 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269014009 0.17 416 0.34 TOD-M Over 5
stories Market 108 18 2 0 16 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 14 N/A Market 0.14 62% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
141 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7259017023 0.48 287 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 33 33 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.36 38% 0 Commercial Store
Combination
With Office Or
Residential
2938 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260021028 0.14 381 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 2235 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7259008032 0.44 279 0.63 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 30 30 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 26% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3229 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7261033027 0.54 377 0.54 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 37 37 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.55 39% 0 Commercial Store 2130 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7274006001 0.16 369 0.64 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 11 11 0 0 Commercial CHW 0 0 N/A Market 0.85 55% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination,
Two Stories
1038 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268018024 0.5 366 0.5 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 34 34 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.33 6% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1199 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7260025029 0.72 283 0.87 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 50 50 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.17 47% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
2625 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7260021027 0.14 381 0.42 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 2219 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 35
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7259020016 0.13 284 0.66 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 69 9 9 0 0 Commercial CCP 0 0 N/A Market 0.40 40% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
2841 E
ANAHEIM ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90804
7120001036 0.23 611 0.27 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 7 0 1 6 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.55 26% 0 Commercial Store 2990 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120002033 0.28 612 0.28 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.11 9% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3012 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114005058 0.48 619 0.48 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.96 26% 1 Commercial Service Station 1965 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120018072 0.22 613 0.69 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 10 10 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.82 14% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
3490 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115007037 0.14 627 0.41 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 5% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1115 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120018077 0.35 613 0.69 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 44 15 15 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.55 20% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
3430 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120017024 5.34 615 5.34 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 267 0 53 214 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.62 37% 16 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
3303 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114001030 0.11 628 2.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 4 4 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 14% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 1221 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114009037 0.35 620 0.35 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.07 13% 1 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
1600 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114013025 0.48 629 0.48 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 14 0 3 11 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.89 35% 1 Commercial Shopping
Center
(Neighborhood,
Community)
1200 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115007038 0.14 627 0.41 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.24 68% 0 Commercial Store 1117 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7120018031 0.36 614 0.36 NSC-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 11 0 2 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Vacant Land 3350 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 36
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7115005012 0.15 625 0.29 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.43 52% 1 Commercial Store 801 E ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114005057 0.38 618 0.38 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 11 0 2 9 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.12 17% 0 Commercial Store 1833 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7114001058 2.33 628 2.44 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 87 87 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.94 30% 1 Commercial Supermarket,
12,000 SF Or
More
1313 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115006039 0.38 626 0.8 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 14 14 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.50 33% 1 Commercial Store 901 E ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115006032 0.28 626 0.8 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 11 11 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.19 15% 0 Commercial Auto, Car Wash
Only, Self
Service Type
1011 E
ARTESIA BLVD
CARSON
CA 90746
7115007039 0.13 627 0.41 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.67 54% 0 Commercial Store 1133 E
ARTESIA BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7115006031 0.14 626 0.8 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 5 5 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.30 19% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1009 E
ARTESIA BLVD
CARSON
CA 90746
7240001023 0.32 115 0.32 MFR-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 10 0 2 8 Institutional I 0 0 N/A Market 0.44 29% 0 Institutional School (Private) 5270 E
ATHERTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90815
7239008001 3.226399 690 3.226399 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 39 0 0 39 Residential R-1-N 5 17 N/A Market 2.10 20% 1 Institutional Church 6500 E
ATHERTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90815
7139012012 0.16 59 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.25 48% 1 Residential Single Family 323 E BIXBY RD
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7139012011 0.16 59 0.32 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.58 35% 0 Commercial Office Building 301 E BIXBY RD
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7138031016 0.299029 685 0.299029 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-1-N 5 2 N/A Market 1.13 40% 1 Residential Single Family 645 E BIXBY RD
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7280020038 0.13 483 0.83 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 22 2 0 20 Planned
Development PD-30 150 20 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 139 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7264004020 0.12 586 0.27 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.56 31% 0 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
3215 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90803
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 37
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7265010024 0.26 493 0.26 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 13 0 3 10 Residential -
MFR R-4-R 22 6 N/A Market 0.20 41% 2 Commercial Store 1100 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281021032 0.4 499 0.8 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 68 7 0 61 Planned
Development PD-30 150 60 Market Market 0.19 23% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
740 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7280020035 0.16 483 0.83 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 27 3 0 24 Planned
Development PD-30 150 24 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 127 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281021004 0.4 499 0.8 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 68 7 0 61 Planned
Development PD-30 150 60 Market Market 0.50 50% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
730 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7275019031 0.12 490 0.35 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 6 0 1 5 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.75 55% 1 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
1923 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281013014 0.26 501 0.26 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 44 4 0 40 Planned
Development PD-30 150 39 Market Market 0.00 0% 0 Commercial Parking Lot, Commercial Use
733 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7281015100 0.35 502 0.35 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 60 6 0 54 Planned
Development PD-30 150 53 Market Market 0.50 27% 4 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
525 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7256011029 0.275373 687 0.275373 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.14 23% 0 Commercial Auto, Car Wash
Only, Self
Service Type
4000 E
BROADWAY
LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7206023021 0.14 23 0.42 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.30 25% 1 Residential Single Family 162 E CANTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206023022 0.14 23 0.42 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.29 40% 1 Residential Single Family 170 E CANTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206023025 0.15 22 0.85 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Affordable 106 16 16 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 11 N/A Affordable 0.00 32% 0 Residential Vacant Land 220 E CANTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206023023 0.14 23 0.42 TOD-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 77 11 1 0 10 Specific Plan SP-1-CDR 70 10 N/A Market 0.33 28% 1 Residential Single Family 212 E CANTON ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7266005008 0.12 329 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 17 2 0 15 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.52 49% 2 Residential Duplex 1032 E
CHANDA CT
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7266005009 0.12 329 0.36 DT 80 Feet Downtown 140 17 2 0 15 Planned Development PD-30 150 18 Market Market 0.25 33% 1 Residential Single Family 1036 E
CHANDA CT
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 38
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7264005019 0.17 585 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Residential -
MFR R-2-A 11 2 N/A Market 0.43 19% 1 Residential Single Family 3131 E CORTO PL
LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7209006011 0.15 247 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.25 36% 1 Residential Single Family 534 E DAYMAN ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7209006013 0.15 247 0.3 TOD-L 4 to 5
Stories Market 72 11 0 2 9 Residential
- SFR R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.87 36% 1 Residential Single Family 540 E DAYMAN ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90806
7206021005 0.14 18 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.25 29% 1 Residential Single Family 240 E
ELDRIDGE ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7206021003 0.14 18 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.67 47% 2 Residential Duplex 220 E
ELDRIDGE ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7206021004 0.14 18 0.42 MFR-M
3 Stories
and
under
Market 32 4 0 1 3 Residential -
MFR R-3-4 19 3 N/A Market 0.22 27% 1 Residential Single Family 236 E
ELDRIDGE ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90807
7269021019 0.16 189 0.84 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 24 24 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 13 N/A Affordable 0.02 10% 0 Commercial Auto, Recreation
Equipment,
Construction
Equipment
Sales And
Service
318 E ESTHER
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268030027 0.15 219 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.33 18% 1 Residential Single Family 1234 E ESTHER ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269020020 0.15 207 1.1 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 12 N/A Affordable 0.25 34% 1 Residential Single Family 343 E ESTHER ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7268030002 0.15 219 0.3 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 7 0 1 6 Residential -
MFR R-2-N 11 2 N/A Market 0.33 25% 1 Residential Single Family 1226 E ESTHER ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7269020900 0.15 207 1.1 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 23 23 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 12 N/A Affordable 0.00 13% 0 Residential Vacant Land 333 E ESTHER ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90813
7240011024 0.92 591 0.92 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 35 35 0 0 Commercial CCA 0 0 N/A Market 0.84 31% 0 Institutional School (Private) 5251 E LAS
LOMAS ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90815
7219020012 0.248782 691 0.248782 FCN 2 Stories Market 15 3 0 0 3 Residential R-1-N 5 1 N/A Market 0.44 21% 1 Residential Single Family 5033 E LOS
COYOTES
DIAGONAL
LONG
BEACH CA
90815
7126034025 0.82 665 0.82 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 31 31 0 0 Commercial CNR 11 9 N/A Market 0.34 29% 0 Institutional Church 201 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
Appendix C-3 | Site Inventory
C-3 - 39
November 2021
C-3
Appendix
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7131002030 0.26 78 0.39 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.75 36% 0 Commercial Professional Building
100 E MARKET
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7131004006 0.16 79 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.62 36% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
330 E MARKET
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7126035041 0.14 666 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.52 41% 1 Residential Single Family 135 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7131002003 0.13 78 0.39 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 1 N/A Market 0.32 22% 0 Commercial Store 114 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7131001026 0.17 77 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.25 43% 1 Residential Single Family 58 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7131001025 0.16 77 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.46 30% 1 Commercial Store And
Residential
Combination
54 E MARKET
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7131004007 0.17 79 0.33 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 5 0 1 4 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.73 25% 0 Commercial Professional Building
336 E MARKET
ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7126036056 0.3 668 0.3 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 9 0 2 7 Commercial CNR 11 3 N/A Market 0.84 22% 2 Residential Duplex 13 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7126035020 0.14 666 0.28 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 4 0 1 3 Commercial CNR 11 2 N/A Market 0.58 40% 1 Residential Single Family 127 E MARKET ST
LONG
BEACH CA
90805
7243004019 0.26 599 0.26 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Market 30 8 0 2 6 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.53 44% 0 Commercial Professional
Building,
Medical Dental
Building
5865 E NAPLES
PLZ
LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7243004015 0.63 598 0.63 NSC-L
3 Stories
and
under
Affordable 38 24 24 0 0 Commercial CNP 0 0 N/A Market 0.37 35% 0 Institutional Church 5871 E NAPLES PLZ
LONG
BEACH CA
90803
7281023013 0.42 487 0.42 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 71 7 0 64 Planned
Development PD-30 150 63 Market Market 0.43 21% 0 Commercial Restaurant, Cocktail Lounge
615 E OCEAN
BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7280029024 0.99 486 0.99 DT
Ht
Incentive
Dist
Downtown 170 168 17 0 151 Planned
Development PD-30 150 149 Market Market 0.61 54% 0 Commercial Office Building,
6 Through 13
Stories
211 E OCEAN
BLVD
LONG
BEACH CA
90802
7253001001 0.23 256 0.23 NSC-M 4 to 5
Stories Market 50 11 0 2 9 Commercial CO 22 5 N/A Market 0.02 8% 1 Commercial Auto, Used
Car Sales And
Service
3600 E PACIFIC
COAST HWY
LONG
BEACH
CA LONG
BEACH CA
Housing Element | City of Long Beach
C-3 - 40
November 2021
Appendix
C-3
APN
Parcel Acreage
Site ID
Site Acreage
PlaceType
PlaceType
Height
Category
PlaceType Site
Designation
Density
PlaceType
Scenario Units
Low Income
Units
Moderate
Income Units
Market Rate
Units
Zoning
Category
Zoning District
Zoning Density
Zoning Scenario
Units
Downtown
Affordability
Zoning Site
Designation
Improvement to
Land Ratio
Lot Coverage
Existing Units
General Use
Use Description
Address
City and Zip
Code
7269019050 0.47 187 0.63 TOD-M Over 5
stories Affordable 150 71 71 0 0 Specific Plan SP-1-TN 80 38 N/A Affordable 0.05 53% 0 Commercial Store 220 E PACIFIC