Cities Index.
071222-CH-13corresp

Long Beach City Council
July 12, 2022

Document
071222-CH-13corresp
Meeting
July 12, 2022
Body
Long Beach City Council
Original file
1.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on longbeach.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

From:

To: Alexis Oropeza; Jorge Ramirez
Cc:

Subject: Proposed carwash at 5005 Long Beach, Long Beach Date: Monday, September 21, 2020 4:34:37 PM
-EXTERNAL-
Good afternoon Jorge,
Please see email below in support of our project. We have provided the information that was supplied to you to Ms. Chiles and we received the email below.

Look forward to your supportive staff report.

Sincerely,
Ahmad Ghaderi
A & S Engineering, Inc.
28405 Sand Canyon Road, suite “B”
Canyon Country, CA., 91387
Ph: 661-250-9300
FX: 661-250-9333
From: Nicole Howton Chiles
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 3:25 PM
To: Ahmad Ghaderi
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Proposed carwash at 5005 Long Beach, Long Beach Thank you for sharing with me the details of your project. All of my questions were answered and I have no concerns that this car wash will interfere with our learning environment.

Thank you again.

I wish you all the best.

NICOLE
Nicole Howton Chiles, Principal
Dooley Elementary School
5075 Long Beach Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90805
(562) 428-7274
"Education is the most powerful weapon we can use
to change the world." ~ Nelson Mandela
Attachment D

1 Alexis Oropeza
Subject: FW: 5005 Long Beach Blvd. & 6090 Long Beach Blvd.

From: Tracy Nishihira
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 10:23 AM
To: Alexis Oropeza <[email protected]>
Cc: ALAN REISING David Miranda
Subject: RE: 5005 Long Beach Blvd. & 6090 Long Beach Blvd.

-EXTERNAL-

Good morning Alexis,

I appreciate your patience as the District reviewed the documents provided by the City for these projects.

Based upon our preliminary evaluation of the project exhibits provided for the proposed car wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd., we have the following concerns:
- District concurs with the City’s finding that the existing wall is not an adequate buffer between incompatible uses and that project will expose students to elevated levels of noise and air pollutants, particularly due to proximity of the 22-6” tall building to the only play field and apparatus available to 1st-5th grade students on the Dooley ES school site. The proposed structure would only be 1’-1” away from the 9’-0” high wall separating the two lots. The project documents do not illustrate the proximity but is roughly shown here:

2 - Applicant’s assessment of noise levels in relation to school building location is not adequate. Play areas need to be taken into consideration also. District concurs with City that students at Dooley already experience higher levels of noise and pollution during recess that will be further impacted by the project. - Construction will impact the Dooley ES site as it is not reasonable to expect that the construction of the building on the north side can be completed within 1’-
1” of space. Potential impact to trees along the north property line also.
- Detailed peer review is necessary to applicant’s Air Quality Study and Greenhouse Gas study to ensure emission factors/modeling used are adequate and vehicle and equipment detail/usages are accurate to confirm impacts as less than significant. Study is based on 600 trips per day which is 25% less than trips noted in applicant’s Traffic Impact Analysis.
- District concurs with City finding that traffic, particularly during peak hours, would conflict with the pedestrian path creating safety hazards.

Until further analysis is completed and items of concern resolved, District fully concurs with City’s recommendation to deny the project permit.

Thank you,

Tracy Nishihira, AIA
Interim Planning Administrator
Long Beach USD – Facilities Development & Planning

Email: [email protected]
Phone: 562-997-7550 | Cell:

The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.

From: Alexis Oropeza
To: Patricia Diefenderfer
Subject: FW: 5005 Long Beach Blvd. & 6090 Long Beach Blvd.

Date: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 11:33:00 AM
Attachments: image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image007.png
image008.png
image009.png
image010.png
image011.png
image012.png

Alexis Oropeza
Current Planning Officer

Long Beach Development Services I Planning Bureau
T    562.570.6413

F

562.570.6068
411

West

Ocean

Blvd.,

3rd

Floor

I

Long

Beach,

CA

90802
[email protected]  I  www.lbds.info

From:

Tracy

Nishihira

<[email protected]>

Sent:

Monday,

June

7,

2021

11:25

AM
To:

Alexis

Oropeza

<[email protected]>
Cc:

ALAN

REISING

<[email protected]>;

David

Miranda

<[email protected]>
Subject:

RE:

5005

Long

Beach

Blvd.

&

6090

Long

Beach

Blvd.

-EXTERNAL-

Good

morning

Alexis,

That

is

correct.

The

revised

studies

do

not

address

these

concerns.

Thank

you,

Tracy Nishihira, AIA
Interim Planning Administrator
Long

Beach

USD

–

Facilities

Development

&

Planning

Email:

[email protected]
Phone: 562-997-7550  |   Cell:

The

content

of

this

email

is

confidential

and

intended

for

the

recipient

specified

in

message

only.

It

is

strictly
forbidden

to

share

any

part

of

this

message

with

any

third

party,

without

a

written

consent

of

the

sender.

If

you
received

this

message

by

mistake,

please

reply

to

this

message

and

follow

with

its

deletion,

so

that

we

can

ensure
such

a

mistake

does

not

occur

in

the

future.

From:

Alexis

Oropeza

[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent:

Monday,

June

07,

2021

9:25

AM
To:

Tracy

Nishihira

<[email protected]>
Cc:

ALAN

REISING

<[email protected]>; David Miranda <[email protected]> Subject:

RE:

5005

Long

Beach

Blvd.

&

6090

Long

Beach

Blvd.

- This message originated from outside the Long Beach Unified School District.  Do NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the contents are safe.

Hi Tracy,

I

wanted

to

clarify

that

the

comments

provided

from

the

school

district

remain

even

based

on

the

revised

studies

that

were

attached

to

my

email.

Thank

you,

Alexis Oropeza
Current Planning Officer

Long Beach Development Services I Planning Bureau
T    562.570.6413

F

562.570.6068
411

West

Ocean

Blvd.,

3rd

Floor

I

Long

Beach,

CA

90802
[email protected]  I  www.lbds.info

From:

Tracy

Nishihira

<[email protected]>
Sent:

Monday,

May

24,

2021

10:23

AM
To:

Alexis

Oropeza

<[email protected]>
Cc:

ALAN

REISING

<[email protected]>; David Miranda <[email protected]> Subject:

RE:

5005

Long

Beach

Blvd.

&

6090

Long

Beach

Blvd.

-EXTERNAL-

Good

morning

Alexis,

I

appreciate

your

patience

as

the

District

reviewed

the

documents

provided

by

the

City

for

these

projects.

Based

upon

our

preliminary

evaluation

of

the

project

exhibits

provided

for

the

proposed

car

wash

at

5005

Long

Beach

Blvd.,

we

have

the

following

concerns:

District concurs with the City’s finding that the existing wall is not an adequate buffer between incompatible uses and that project will expose students to elevated levels of noise and air pollutants, particularly due to proximity of the 22-6” tall building to the only play field and apparatus

available

to

1st-5th grade students on the Dooley ES school site. The proposed structure would only be 1’-1” away from the 9’-0” high wall separating the two lots. The project documents do not  illustrate the proximity but is roughly shown here:

Applicant’s assessment of noise levels in relation to school building location is not adequate. Play areas need to be taken into consideration also. District concurs with City that students at Dooley already experience higher levels of noise and pollution during recess that will be further impacted

by

the

project.

Construction will impact the Dooley ES site as it is not reasonable to expect that the construction of the building on the north side can be completed within 1’-1” of space. Potential impact to trees along the north property line also.

Detailed peer review is necessary to applicant’s Air Quality Study and Greenhouse Gas study to ensure emission factors/modeling used are adequate and vehicle and equipment detail/usages are accurate to confirm impacts as less than significant. Study is based on 600 trips per day which

is

25%

less

than

trips

noted

in

applicant’s

Traffic

Impact

Analysis.

District concurs with City finding that traffic, particularly during peak hours, would conflict with the pedestrian path creating safety hazards.

Until further analysis is completed and items of concern resolved, District fully concurs with City’s recommendation to deny the project permit.

Thank you,

Tracy Nishihira, AIA
Interim Planning Administrator
Long Beach USD – Facilities Development & Planning

Email:
[email protected]
Phone: 562-997-7550 | Cell:

The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.

From: Tracy Nishihira
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:39 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: ALAN REISING <[email protected]>; David Miranda <[email protected]> Subject: RE: 5005 Long Beach Blvd. & 6090 Long Beach Blvd.

Good afternoon Alexis,

Thank
you for the reminder…my apologies for not responding to your prior email. It was sent to my alternate email address and was buried amongst a slew of other emails. We will respond within the week.

Thanks
again,

Tracy Nishihira, AIA
Planning PM / Interim Planning Administrator

Long Beach USD - Facilities Development & Planning Branch 2425 Webster Avenue
Long Beach, CA 90810
t: 562-997-7550
c 7
e: lbschools.net

www.lbschoolbonds.net

The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.

From: Alexis Oropeza [
mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 3:31 PM
To: ALAN REISING <[email protected]>; [email protected]; David Miranda <[email protected]> Subject: RE: 5005 Long Beach Blvd. & 6090 Long Beach Blvd.

- This message originated from outside the Long Beach Unified School District.  Do NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the contents are safe.

Hi All,

I am writing in follow up to find out if the District has any comments regarding the proposed car wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd., located just south of Dooley Elementary School.

Additionally,
I wanted to know if there were any specific conditions the district would like to to see incorporated into the project at  6090 Long Beach Blvd, in the event that it is approved.

Sincerely,

Alexis Oropeza
Current Planning Officer

Long Beach Development Services I Planning Bureau
T    562.570.6413
F
562.570.6068
411 West Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor I Long Beach, CA 90802
[email protected]  I  www.lbds.info

From: Alexis Oropeza
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 11:01 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: 5005 Long Beach Blvd.

Hi All,

Thanks
for the meeting this morning.  In follow up I am sending you the background information on the car wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd.

It was agendized for the October 1st Planning Commission meeting with a recommendation for denial.  The matter was continued at the applicant’s request.

Planning
Commission October 1st Agenda, See Agenda Item 8 here:  http://longbeach.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=805961&GUID=56858238-BD2D-4D24-9404-6460D1879744

The following is a link to letter: http://longbeach.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=F&ID=8811155&GUID=D9EA6BF4-007B-4A78-A1E5-8174D8DA846C

Since
October the applicant has updated the review of the traffic queuing and moved the pay station closer to the car wash tunnel.  Attached is the updated study and site plan that the City is currently under review.

Please let us know if you have any comments on this on or before May 10th.

Thank
you,

Alexis Oropeza
Current Planning Officer

Long Beach Development Services I Planning Bureau
T    562.570.6413
F
562.570.6068
411 West Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor I Long Beach, CA 90802
[email protected]  I  www.lbds.info

To help balance the City’s budget during this economic downturn, some services are closed on alternating Fridays for staff furloughs (unpaid time off). These furloughs affect many operations in all City Departments and help prevent significant service reductions to the community. To see a schedule of impacted service days, visit www.longbeach.gov/furlough. We appreciate your patience and understanding.

​

1 Heather Flores
From: Laurie C. Angel
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 3:43 PM
To: PlanningCommissioners
Subject: Comments on March 17 Agenda item 1
‐EXTERNAL‐

Regarding the CUP for the proposed car wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd.I have looked through the attachments and I see nothing that explains how cars exit the car wash onto the street.  It looks as though the proposed use barely has any room at all to operate without encroaching on the adjacent va cant property (former Sizzler property).

You must consider how the proposed use will impact the ability of this adjacent (Sizzler) property to sell, and develop in the future.  Truly, this is pretty poor land use for such an important corner.  The property should be given better long term conside ration  for the promise of improved development.  The car wash would undoubtedly adversely impact any decent development to the Sizzler property in the future.

It seems that a car wash is merely a last ditch effort to improve profits for the gas station at the expense of proper development ifor he area
.   There are car washes on other corners.  How many car washes do you need at one intersection?  How does a car wash impact water and sewage usage?

Also, since this is right next to a school, I am concerned about the noise, trash, dirt and water borne dirt that may mak e
its way onto or near the Dooley School property.

Regards,

Laurie Angel
Jane Addams Neighborhood Association

LONG BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

SERVING LONG BEACH, LAKEWOOD, SIGNAL HILL AND AVALON

OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT
1515 Hughes Way  Long Beach, California 90810  (562) 997-8242

June 2, 2022

Alexis Oropeza, Current Planning Officer via email: [email protected] Long Beach Development Services / Planning Bureau
411 West Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802

RE: Appeal (APL22-003) of the Planning Commission’s 3/17/22 Decision to Deny a Conditional Use Permit for Proposed Car Wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd., Long Beach, CA

Dear Ms. Oropeza,

Thank you for notifying the Long Beach Unified School District (“District”) of the upcoming applicant’s appeal of the City of Long Beach (“City”) Planning Commission’s denial of a Conditional Use Permit for the proposed car wash at 5005 Long Beach Blvd. This proposed project is located directly adjacent to Dooley Elementary School (“School”).

On August 24, 2021, the District submitted a comment letter outlining the following health and safety concerns regarding this project:

There would be virtually no separation between the car wash and the School’s students. The proposed car wash building would be 22’-6” high and a foot away from the School’s playfield and playground equipment. Only an existing 9’ wall would separate the car wash building from young students playing on the yard.

The proposed car wash will intensify vehicle use next to the School. As such, the car wash will intensify pollutant exposure for students already in a pollution burdened area.

The School currently experiences high noise levels due to its location at a busy intersection. The proposed car wash will only elevate the noise level for the school with negative impacts to health and student learning.

The total number of vehicle trips generated by the proposed car wash will create undue safety hazards for students. Sight lines between motorists and students will be degraded by queued vehicles that are in close proximity to students walking, biking, or skateboarding to and from school.

Since the submission of its letter, the District has met with the applicant to no avail. Additionally, in reviewing the applicant’s appeal, the applicant fails to identify or prove any errors in the Planning Commission’s findings and decision. Accordingly, the District respectfully requests that City Council uphold the Planning Commission’s decision and deny the applicant’s appeal.

We appreciate the opportunity to restate our ongoing concerns for the City Council’s consideration. If there are any questions or any other information needed, please do not hesitate to contact Tracy Nishihira of the Distric’ts Facilities Development and Planning Branch at (562) 997-7550.

Sincerely,

Jill Baker, Ed.D.

Superintendent of Schools
Long Beach Unified School District

cc: Yumi Takahashi
Alan Reising
David Miranda

← All documents from this meeting