eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
1. (22-0866) Recommendation to receive and file a
report for Mayor Garcia's travel to Washington, D.C.,
for meetings with Congressional members and
federal agencies.
Dave Shukla [email protected] IIJA monies for Shoreline Drive repaving? Interesting... 8/2/2022
5. (22-0870) Recommendation to authorize City
Attorney to pay sum of $70,000, in full settlement of
lawsuit entitled Raquel Navarro v. City of Long
Beach, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.
BC686956.
Michelle Baker michellebaker199@gmail
.com
Why doesn't the City Attorney do his job? Why is the city outsourcing legal fees and settling so many cases. This is absurd and why does he make so much money for doing nothing?
8/1/2022
10. (22-0875) Recommendation to authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
necessary to amend Contract No. 36292 with
California Surveying and Drafting Supplies, Inc., of
Sacramento, CA, for furnishing and delivering
Trimble Alloy Global Navigation Satellite Systems,
base station receivers, hardware and related
software for subsidence monitoring activity, to
increase the annual contract amount by $20,000, for
a revised annual contract amount of $160,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$16,000, for a revised total annual contract amount
not to exceed $176,000, at the discretion of the City
Manager. (Citywide)
Dave Shukla [email protected] m The data generated by this new monitoring system should be publicly available - particularly for any known activity south of PCH across the City, including that offshore in the City's near 30 sq. mi of water area. 8/2/2022
13. (22-0878) Recommendation to adopt resolution
authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a
contract, and any necessary documents including
any necessary subsequent amendments, with
Elastec, Inc., of Carmi, IL, for the purchase of an
OMNI Catamaran boat, with floating trash collection
pods, lighting, and other accessories, for a total
amount not to exceed $186,531, including taxes and
fees. (Citywide)
Dave Shukla [email protected] Neat boat 8/2/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 1 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
13. (22-0878) Recommendation to adopt resolution
authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a
contract, and any necessary documents including
any necessary subsequent amendments, with
Elastec, Inc., of Carmi, IL, for the purchase of an
OMNI Catamaran boat, with floating trash collection
pods, lighting, and other accessories, for a total
amount not to exceed $186,531, including taxes and
fees. (Citywide)
Lucy Johnson [email protected]
m
Great concept for assisting in the cleanup of trash in our local waterways. Please approve.
8/2/2022
14. (22-0879) Recommendation to adopt resolution
authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a
contract, and any necessary documents including
any necessary subsequent amendments, with
California Newspapers Partnership, of Colorado
Springs, CO, to provide local advertising that targets
the readership of the local newspaper, in a total
annual amount not to exceed $250,000, with a 20
percent contingency in the amount of $50,000, for a
total annual contract amount not to exceed
$300,000, for a period of one year, with the option to
renew for four additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager. (Citywide)
Corliss Lee [email protected] Why on earth would the taxpayers of the City of Long Beach want to give $250K to a newspaper group in Colorado Springs? That sounds like a big waste of Long Beach tax dollars. I ask that you vote against this agenda item. Corliss Lee President Eastside Voice (714) 401 7063
8/2/2022
14. (22-0879) Recommendation to adopt resolution
authorizing City Manager, or designee, to execute a
contract, and any necessary documents including
any necessary subsequent amendments, with
California Newspapers Partnership, of Colorado
Springs, CO, to provide local advertising that targets
the readership of the local newspaper, in a total
annual amount not to exceed $250,000, with a 20
percent contingency in the amount of $50,000, for a
total annual contract amount not to exceed
$300,000, for a period of one year, with the option to
renew for four additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager. (Citywide)
Michelle Baker michellebaker199@gmail
.com
WHy are you paying so much for newspaper advertising? Makes no sense and this sounds fishy.
8/1/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 2 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
21. (22-0885) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. ITB PW22-056 and award a
contract to Rockwell Engineering & Equipment Co.,
Inc., of Tustin, CA, for furnishing and delivering bilge system pumps, in a total amount of $235,594,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$23,559, for a total contract amount of $259,153,
and, authorize City Manager, or designee, to execute
all documents necessary to enter into the contract,
including any necessary subsequent amendments.
(District 1)
Dave Shukla [email protected] m That's a lot of Tidelands fundi ng dedicated to keep the QM in the water... The City may look back on this as a real missed opportunity to...
(wait for it... wait for it...)
...bail itself out of this situation!
8/2/2022
22. (22-0886) Recommendation to conduct a Budget
Hearing to receive and discuss an overview of the
Proposed Fiscal Year 2023 Budget. (Citywide)
Jeff Mallin [email protected] D ear Honorable Council Members and Mayor, Your ongoing support of the Bluff Park Historic Lamppost Project in the upcoming City Budget process would be greatly valued and valuable not just for this small area of the city but also for broader efforts for historic preservation and the prominence and attractiveness of Long Beach to current and potential residents businesses visitors 8/2/2022
22. (22-0886) Recommendation to conduct a Budget
Hearing to receive and discuss an overview of the
Proposed Fiscal Year 2023 Budget. (Citywide)
Cheri Hawks [email protected] m I am commenting in regards to th e budget review this evening, specially relating to the topic of the lamppost support in Bluff Park. As a longtime resident of Bluff Park, I believe the funding for the lamppost project is extremely important. Historical preservation is a huge part of the identity of Long Beach and is appreciated and recognized by residents and visitors from many areas Each neighborhood of Long 8/2/2022
22. (22-0886) Recommendation to conduct a Budget
Hearing to receive and discuss an overview of the
Proposed Fiscal Year 2023 Budget. (Citywide)
Marianne
Buchanan
mariannebuchanan330@
gmail.com
Hon. Mayor and City Councilmembers,
Please keep your promise and view every item on the proposed 2023 Budget through the lens of racial equity. Spend our dollars on the safety and health of the BIPOC sisters and brothers of Long Beach.
Ending drilling for fossil fuels and fully implementing the Climate Action Plan will be a good start We must ensure a livable city for all 8/1/2022
PUBLIC COMMENT: Michelle B aker michellebaker199@gmail
.com
the proposed CPCC admendment is bogus and a slap in the face to residents who want true change. Suely Saro should excuse herself from this vote as well since she did nothing to help while on the CPCC and its a conflict of interest. The proposal would make the CPCC have less power and oversight. The City Manager overrides everything and not right
8/1/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 3 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
29. (22-0894) Recommendation to adopt resolution
declaring City-owned property located at 6845
Atlantic Avenue (APN 7116-019-907) (Subject
Property) as "exempt surplus land" as defined in
Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(A); and
authorize City Manager, or designee, to take any
actions and execute any documents necessary to
ensure compliance with the Surplus Land Act and
State regulations relating thereto. (District 9)
Corliss Lee [email protected] Looking at the staff report there is a line " it is anticipated that an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement will be executed between the City and the adjacent property owner. " On looking at the map it does appear that the adjacent property owner would be the most likely bidder to win, but it is a well known fact that single source procurements are undesirable because there is no leverage to get a good deal. On behalf of the citizens, this property should be put up for competitive bidding. Corliss Lee President Eastside Voice 714 401 7063
8/2/2022
29. (22-0894) Recommendation to adopt resolution
declaring City-owned property located at 6845
Atlantic Avenue (APN 7116-019-907) (Subject
Property) as "exempt surplus land" as defined in
Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(A); and
authorize City Manager, or designee, to take any
actions and execute any documents necessary to
ensure compliance with the Surplus Land Act and
State regulations relating thereto. (District 9)
Padric Gleason
Gonzales
[email protected]
m
I write in support of this motion. Redeveloping these adjacent properties will increase the housing stock and improve housing quality in the area, while maintaining shelter services for people experiencing homelessness. Renovating an abandoned liquor store and warehouse and converting it to housing is a smart land use change that will help to chip away at our city's requirement to build 26,000 new housing units in the next eight years. We need more examples of creative reuse like this one.
7/27/2022
32. (22-0896) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. RFP PW22-042 and award a
contract to Arcadis U.S., Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for construction management and inspection services
for the Belmont Beach and Aquatics Center Project,
in a total amount not to exceed $6,505,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$650,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed
$7,155,500, for a period of two years, with the option
to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
necessary to enter into the contract, including any
necessary subsequent amendments. (District 3)
Dave Shukla [email protected] Oppose.
That's a significant amount of Tidelands funding that many not remain safely in situ during its life-cycle, in part due to Tidelands fund
generating activities!
The contract is half the total cost of constructing the new pools at USC that will be hosting the swimming events for the 2028 Olympics...
That's also a significant contract for pre-construction and planning/architectural holes in it:
"additional funding will be required to complete the overall BBAC Project. Staff continues to work on the plan to
finance the overall construction of the project, and we expect to bring fi i l t C il b th d f th "
8/2/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 4 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
32. (22-0896) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. RFP PW22-042 and award a
contract to Arcadis U.S., Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for construction management and inspection services
for the Belmont Beach and Aquatics Center Project,
in a total amount not to exceed $6,505,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$650,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed
$7,155,500, for a period of two years, with the option
to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
necessary to enter into the contract, including any
necessary subsequent amendments. (District 3)
Lucy Johnson [email protected]
m
I urge the all members of the City Council to approve this agenda item. It is crucial for keeping the project moving forward in keeping with the timeline as shown in the Council Letter. It has taken over 9 years since the original Belmont Plaza Olympic Pool was permanently closed, and this replacement facility is sorely needed by all the citizens of Long Beach. It will be a fantastic asset for years to come.
Thanks to each of you for your support!
Lucy Johnson
8/2/2022
32. (22-0896) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. RFP PW22-042 and award a
contract to Arcadis U.S., Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for construction management and inspection services
for the Belmont Beach and Aquatics Center Project,
in a total amount not to exceed $6,505,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$650,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed
$7,155,500, for a period of two years, with the option
to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
Kim Onisko [email protected] Pleas e confirm the contract. We need the pool built as soon as possible. Thank you!
8/2/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 5 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
32. (22-0896) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. RFP PW22-042 and award a
contract to Arcadis U.S., Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for construction management and inspection services
for the Belmont Beach and Aquatics Center Project,
in a total amount not to exceed $6,505,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$650,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed
$7,155,500, for a period of two years, with the option
to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
necessary to enter into the contract, including any
necessary subsequent amendments. (District 3)
Ron Batson [email protected]
m
Budget Shortfall?? Would rather see the City cleaned up, Roads and Sidewalks repaired, Parks maintained, Homeless housed or moved, Who needs a pool? It's a lot of money that should be repurposed to "better" use.
8/1/2022
32. (22-0896) Recommendation to adopt
Specifications No. RFP PW22-042 and award a
contract to Arcadis U.S., Inc., of Los Angeles, CA, for construction management and inspection services
for the Belmont Beach and Aquatics Center Project,
in a total amount not to exceed $6,505,000,
authorize a 10 percent contingency in the amount of
$650,500, for a total contract amount not to exceed
$7,155,500, for a period of two years, with the option
to renew for three additional one-year periods, at the
discretion of the City Manager; and, authorize City
Manager, or designee, to execute all documents
necessary to enter into the contract, including any
necessary subsequent amendments. (District 3)
Philip Belfer [email protected] Cons truction of a shiny new pool is blinding the City Council to more important needs along the waterfront. Our coastline is constantly littered with sewage debris. The stairs leading to the water from the bluff are crumbling. The bathrooms along the beach are filthy, rarely usable, and serve as de facto shelters for the unhoused. Instead of fixing these outstanding problems along the waterfront, the City Council will now vote to build an outdoor pool where one already exists. Is this good public policy?
The social inequities of this project are glaring. Busing in residents from underserved communities is a false promise. Those of us who can afford to live near the ocean and Alamitos Bay already have ample opportunities for water sports and swimming. We don't need this. If Long Beach needs a new pool, for the long-term benefit of a majority of the citizens of Long Beach, it should be located downtown, uptown or near light rail service.
7/31/2022
33. (22-0758) Recommendation to declare ordinance
amending Section 1.20.010 of the Long Beach
Municipal Code relating to the boundaries of the
City's nine council districts, adding Section 1.20.020
to maintain final adopted maps on the internet
webpage for at least ten years, read the first time
and laid over to the next regular meeting of the City
Council for final reading. (Citywide)
Dave Shukla [email protected] Oppose.
The following facts about the redistricting map should be noted:
1. The effective CVAP for Black and Cambodian populations now, and as the continue to age out in future elections, is lower than in other options available at the time for the CD6 boundaries.
2. In addition to movin
g over 40% of the population into new districts,
8/2/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 6 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M . eComments Report for City Council Meeting Agenda of August 2, 2022 Item Name E-mail Address Comment Received
39. (22-0907) Recommendation to request City
Council to receive and file an Economic Impact
Report for a proposed Long Beach Minimum Wage
for Healthcare Workers pursuant to Election Code
Section 9212; take action on the Initiative Ordinance
pursuant to Election Code Section 9215; and, direct
City Manager on any other related activities.
(Citywide)
Lucy Johnson [email protected]
m
If the City must take one of only two options available regarding this proposed healthcare workers' minimum wage, I recommend the Council let this be a matter for the voters to decide. Please do NOT approve adding this forced minimum wage for only a specific, rather small, group of people, none of whom are city employees. To me, this "initiative" is nothing less than blackmail by large unions seeking more members. It only covers certain (not all) healthcare workers, and only those at private institutions. Follow the money. Who is paying for this 8/2/2022
39. (22-0907) Recommendation to request City
Council to receive and file an Economic Impact
Report for a proposed Long Beach Minimum Wage
for Healthcare Workers pursuant to Election Code
Section 9212; take action on the Initiative Ordinance
pursuant to Election Code Section 9215; and, direct
City Manager on any other related activities.
(Citywide)
Richard Rothell rothell1@verizon. net The motion for a minimum wag e for health care workers should no be supported. Wages should be negotiated between employers and employees. If employees are unhappy, then unionize. If heath care workers get a minimum wage from the city, what about grocery clerks, Uber drivers, teachers, etc. etc. This motion frustrates normal negotiations between employer and employees and opens a can of worms for the city once established. Come on city council, use common sense.
7/31/2022
080222eCommentsReport.xlsx Page 7 o f 7 Printed: 080222 4:00 P.M .