111522-H-29sr&att.pdf — Long Beach City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 1 of 5)

CITY OF
LONG Development Services Department
411 West Ocean Boulevard, 3'd Floor Long Beach, CA 90802 (562) 570-5237
November 15, 2022

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
City of Long Beach
California
RECOMMENDATION:

H-29
Adopt a Resolution certifying the River Park Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR-07-20, SCH#2021020492);
Declare the Ordinance approving a Zone Change (ZCHG20-002) from Commercial Storage (CS), Commercial Storage with Horse Overlay (CS (H)), and Single-Family Residential, Standard Lot (R-1-N) to Residential, Planned Unit Development (RP-15) and Residential, Planned Unit Development with Horse Overlay (RP-15 (H)), read the first time and laid over to the next regular meeting of the City Council for final reading; Declare the Ordinance approving a Development Agreement (DA20-001) between the City of Long Beach and The River Park Project Owner, LLC, read the first time and laid over to the next regular meeting of the City Council for final reading; Approve Site Plan Review (SPR20-007) for construction of a new residential Planned Unit Development of 226 dwelling units consisting of 7 4 two-story detached single-family homes on small condominium lots, 99 two-story row townhouses, and 53 three-story carriage townhouses, located on 15.53 acres of a 20.4-acre development site, with a park to be developed on the remaining 4.81 acres of the property; Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 82712 (VTTM20-002) to create one master ground lot and 226 airspace lots, on a 20.4-acre development site; and, Adopt a General Plan Conformity Certification (GPC21-003) for the vacation of 1) Baker Street between Golden Avenue and the western edge of the project site, and 2) portions of unused right-of-way on Wardlow Road adjacent to the project site. (District 7)

DISCUSSION
On September 1, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on this project, and recommended (4-1, with two commissioners absent) that the City Council take the above-listed actions to approve the project (Attachment A).

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 2 of 14 ends

The applicant proposes building a new residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of 226 dwelling units and a park, located on a 20.4-acre site. The project site will be divided into a 15.53-acre residential component, which will contain 7 4 two-story detached single-family homes, 99 two-story row townhouses, and 53 three-story carriage townhouses, with each unit to have an individual condominium airspace for ownership. A park is to be developed on the remaining 4.81 acres of the property. Primary access to the PUD would be provided from a private gated drive on Wardlow Road. An emergency access point is proposed at the northeast corner of the complex, at the intersection of Baker Street and Golden Avenue. The proposed circulation system within the PUD consists of a private drive loop to the residential units and amenity features, with on-street guest parking inside the PUD. Vacation of the unimproved Baker Street right-of-way west of Golden Avenue is proposed as part of the project since this street bisects the PUD and its proposed park. The project will include a provision of five percent of the total number of dwelling units as affordable housing units at the very-low Area Median Income (AMI) level.

Project Site
The project site is located on the former Oil Operators, Inc., property at 712 Baker Street, bounded by Wardlow Road on the south, Golden Avenue on the east, the San Diego Freeway (1-405) on the north, and the Los Angeles County flood control channel parcels and the Los Angeles River (LA River) on the west (Attachment 8). Baker Street bisects the project site from east to west, and this segment of Baker Street is proposed to be vacated and incorporated into the PUD. Baker Street currently functions as a maintenance access road to the Los Angeles County-owned parcels to the west. The pedestrian, cycling, and equestrian trails to the west of the project site are located on the Los Angeles County-owned parcels and would be unaffected by the project. The project site itself contains no trails or through access to the Los Angeles River trail system. The City of Long Beach (City) Baker Street Park is adjacent to the east of the park proposed by the developer, and the design of the proposed park would be integrated with the existing City Park to function as a single larger park. The City's Wrigley Heights Dog Park is adjacent to the southeast of the proposed residential portion of the PUD. Access to the project site is taken from a driveway directly on Wardlow Road, and from Baker Street west of Golden Avenue (Attachment C). The current land use, general plan PlaceType, and zoning of the site and its surroundings are described in the table below.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 3 of 14 ends

T. a bl e 1 - S urroun d" mg L an dU ses, z onmg, an dG enera I Pl an Location Existing Land General Plan Zoning Use Place Type FCN / 2-story
Project site: north Vacant (Founding and cs
and west portion Contemporary (Commercial Storage)
Neighborhood)
Project site: east Vacant FCN / 2-story cs portion
R-1-N
Project site: Vacant FCN / 2-story (Single-family
southwest portion Residential, standard
lot)
Residential R-1-S
East of project site small-lot FCN / 2-story (Single-family development Residential, small lot)
North of project site Freeway OS PR
(Open Space) (Public right-of-way)
Flood control
channel, Los
West of project site Angeles River, OS Not zoned
trails and
recreation
South of project site MFR-L
Multifamily Multiple Family (south of Wardlow residential Residential Low R-4-R Road) Density
Baker Street Park City Park OS CS, R-1-N
Wrigley Heights Dog City Park OS cs Park
Project Proposal and Design
Overlay
None
H (Horse)
None
None
None
None
None
None
H
The developer proposes to build a 226-unit residential PUD on the 15.53-acre portion of the project site between Wardlow Road and Baker Street, and a park on the 4.81-acre portion of the site north of Baker Street. The residential portion of the PUD also will contain an amenity facility and building for residents, consisting of a multi-purpose community room, restrooms, and swimming pool. The PUD unit mix and characteristics are shown in the following table:

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 4 of 14 ends

Table 2- Unit Mix
Unit Type Single-Family Row Townhouses Detached
Unit Count 74 99
Bedroom Count 3-5 3
Unit Size (sq. ft.) 1,924-2,244 1,464-1,800
Buildinq Heiqht 2 stories 2 stories
Unit Parking 2 qarage stalls 2 qaraqe stalls
Affordable Unit Count 0 0
4-unit buildinqs n/a 6
5-unit buildinqs n/a 3
6-unit buildings n/a 10
8-unit buildings n/a 0
10-unit buildinqs n/a 0
Carriage
Townhouses
53 2-3
1,414-1,653
3 stories
2 qaraqe stalls
12 1
3 0
3 1
The 7 4 detached single-family homes have three different proposed unit plans; with each unit plan having four variations. The 99 row townhomes will comprise a total of 19 buildings, split between four-, five-, and six-unit buildings, with three different unit plans for the row town home units, and each unit in each building differentiated using architectural details and colors. The 53 carriage townhomes are found in eight buildings on the project site, split between four-, five, eight-, and 10-unit buildings, with two different unit plans for the carriage townhome units, and again with each unit within each building differentiated using architectural details and colors (Attachment D). A total of five percent of the dwelling units (12 units) will be provided as affordable housing units at the very-low AMI level. All 12 of these units will be provided as carriage townhouses, although they are evenly distributed throughout the carriage townhouse buildings in the PUD.

The single-family homes will be located on the east, north, and west perimeter of the residential portion of the PUD site, fronting on Golden Avenue, the vacated Baker Street right-of-way, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property, with a double-row of single-family homes through the center of the site connecting the rows of single-family homes on the east and west edges. The carriage townhouses are located toward the front of the PUD, with a 30- foot setback from Wardlow Road, with the project drive on the east and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property on the west, and the row townhouses behind. The row townhouses are located in two groups in the center of the PUD: a front group between the carriage townhomes and the double-row of single-family homes, and a rear group surrounded by the single-family homes on all sides.

The single-family homes, row townhouses, carriage townhouses, and the recreation and amenity buildings are designed in Spanish Colonial, Italian, or Santa Barbara architectural styles, each complementary to the other and all broadly reflective of 20th-century architectural traditions in Southern California. The materials selected for the architecture are high-quality, durable components and finishes, with no rough stucco or low-quality foam details or trims, and high-quality Milgard vinyl windows are used, with no white vinyl windows permitted.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 5 of 14 ends

Each dwelling unit in the PUD will be connected to a pedestrian path providing continuous pedestrian circulation throughout the PUD; where these pedestrian paths must cross the private streets or drive aisles, they will be paved with decorative pavers to ensure the pedestrian path is clearly marked. Continuous pedestrian connection will be provided for each unit directly to the public right-of-way. Each unit is also provided with a two-car garage accessed from the private street network within the PUD. Required guest parking is provided on the private streets as well. Landscaping will be provided at all site perimeter areas and stormwater containment and filtration swales, and in each residential front yard for the singlefamily dwellings, including a broad-canopy leafy tree in each front yard to function as a street tree.

Each dwelling unit will be located on a condominium airspace to allow individual ownership, with one master ground lot containing all common areas and amenities owned by the Homeowners' Association (HOA). All streets, sidewalks, and driveways within the development, as well as all common facilities and amenities, will be privately owned and maintained. This includes the recreation center, park, perimeter walls, fences, and gates, as well as utility connections and stormwater systems. The HOA will be responsible for managing the ongoing maintenance of all common improvements and facilities, enforcing the maintenance and appearance standards for each dwelling, enforcing parking restrictions (including use of the guest parking spaces), and managing the placement of trash carts for refuse collection. Additionally, the HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the public sidewalk, parkways, and street trees on public streets adjacent to the PUD. Through the inclusion of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, adequate provision will be made for the long-term maintenance and upkeep of the common areas, community amenities, utilities, and both style of town home buildings in the development by the HOA; while individual homeowners will be responsible for exterior maintenance of the detached single-family homes under HOA supervision.

North of Baker Street, the developer proposes to improve the 4.81 acres of vacant land as a park. This will include the installation of typical park amenities and landscaping, and active recreation uses including sports facilities and a jogging path and exercise stations and a 2-5- year-old play area. Passive recreation uses will include Native American history interpretive signs and path, a butterfly garden, a wildflower meadow, and a picnic area. California native drought-tolerant landscaping will be provided on the park perimeter. Additional park improvements and programming will be developed under guidance of the Parks, Recreation, and Marine Department with the goal of providing recreation area while reducing turf usage due to the ongoing drought. The eastern edge of this park will abut the western edge of the City's Baker Street Park, and the new park will be developed to seamlessly integrate with the City's park to give the appearance of one single larger park. The new park will be open to the public in the same manner as a City park, and the HOA will be required to maintain the new park in perpetuity. Additionally, the developer will be required to make improvements to Baker Street and Wrigley Heights Dog Parks, both of which are adjacent to the PUD. These improvements will include a new self-cleaning restroom and a shade structure over the existing playground at the Baker Street Park, and amenity improvements to the Wrigley Heights Dog

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 6 of 14 ends

Park including benches, trash cans, drinking fountains, message boards, and fence replacement.

Development Standards Compliance
The developer proposes this project as a PUD under Division Ill of Chapter 21.31 of the Zoning Regulations (PUD Ordinance), which specifies development standards for any new PUD. The PUD Ordinance was established to allow development of PUDs with greater flexibility while achieving a greater level of community amenities than would otherwise be built by individual development of dwelling units or projects. The PUD development standards include minimum site area, internal site planning integration requirements, setbacks, building height, private open space, minimum lot sizes and width, and floor area ratio standards.

Notably, the PUD Ordinance requires 15 percent of the total site (approximately three acres) to be developed as common open space amenity area, and compliance with this requirement is achieved through construction of the proposed 4.81-acre park.

Additionally, while the proposed development complies with the building height limits allowed by the PUD Ordinance, the General Plan Land Use Element (LUE) Place Type designation for the project site is Founding and Contemporary Neighborhood, two stories (FCN / 2-St). In order to exceed the two-story height limit imposed by the General Plan, the developer is utilizing a development standards waiver under the State's affordable housing regulations (California Government Code Section 65915), which grants development standards waivers if a specified level of affordable housing is provided in the project. In this case, the developer meets the requirement for one development standards waiver by providing five percent of the dwellings as very-low AMI affordable housing units. The Planning Commission concurs with this development standards waiver claim. This portion of the project related to the affordable units and standards waiver is a ministerial act. The City's lnclusionary Housing Ordinance does not apply to this project since it is not located within either the Downtown or Midtown submarkets.

Requested Entitlements and Recommended Actions
This project requires approval of the following entitlements. Each entitlement and the Planning Commission's recommendation is discussed below.

1. Zone Change: A Zone Change request must accompany any PUD proposal, and as such the developer requests a Zone Change to RP-15, which is a Residential PUD zone with a maximum density of 15 dwelling units per acre (Attachment E).

Existing zoning on the site is a combination of CS (Commercial Storage), CS (H) (Commercial Storage with Horse Overlay), and R-1-N (Single-family Residential,

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 7 of 14 ends

standard lot). The CS zone is a highly restrictive zone that allows a very limited range of land uses consisting mainly of commercial storage facilities (mini-warehouse or selfstorage uses). Development of the proposed project would not be possible under the CS zone, and development of a project consistent with the CS zone would provide no community benefits, achieve no local planning objectives, and would generally create a negative, low-activity and non-beneficial land use. Further, the CS zoning at this site is not consistent with the LUE of the General Plan, which designates the subject site as FCN, a moderate-density residential PlaceType, and development of a commercial storage facility would not be permitted under the General Plan. The R-1-N zone, while consistent with the General Plan, would also preclude development of the proposed project, and instead would allow a very limited number of dwellings to be developed in the small area of the site that is under the R-1-N zone (approximately 60,000-65,000 square feet or 1.5-acre, allowing possibly 6-10 dwellings). This zoning also would fail to achieve local planning objectives, especially related to housing production, and would provide no community benefits either. The existing H Overlay zone on a portion of the CS zone on the subject site is not relevant to the project, since there are no existing equestrian uses or improvements on the site, and none are proposed. The H Overlay is not proposed to be removed from the project site's zoning as part of the requested Zone Change. Nearby equestrian trails and facilities and other nearby areas under the H Overlay zone would remain unaffected by the project development and the rezoning action.

The majority of the Planning Commission supported the Zone Change request, finding it consistent with the General Plan and that it would achieve local planning objectives by allowing significant housing production, and would provide the significant community benefit of the development of a 4.81-acre park, improvements to City parks, and significant public realm improvements to surrounding streets and sidewalks, among other benefits. Justification for the Zone Change is discussed in detail in the Zone Change findings (Attachment F). The Zone Change must be adopted by Ordinance, which requires City Council approval.

2. Site Plan Review and Planned Unit Development: For a PUD project, a PUD approval is required in tandem with the Site Plan Review approval for the project design. Site Plan Review considers general design objectives and guidelines and consistency with the General Plan and zoning, while the PUD approval considers standards specific to a PUD. The Planning Commission supported the Site Plan Review and PUD requests, as all of these applicable objectives and requirements are met by the proposed project design. These are discussed in detail in the Site Plan Review and Planned Unit Development findings. Significant off-site improvements are required in conjunction with this approval, including street, sidewalk, and parkway improvements, improvements to Baker Street and Wrigley Heights Dog Parks, and installation of a fully signalized intersection at the project driveway. These and other required improvements are detailed in the Conditions of Approval (Attachment G).

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 8 of 14 ends

3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM): The developer requests approval of VTTM No. 82712 to subdivide the project site into one master ground lot and individual condominium airspaces for each dwelling unit (Attachment H). This will allow each unit to be sold for individual ownership, while the HOA will own the master ground lot. The Planning Commission supported the VTTM request, as it is consistent with the General Plan and zoning development standards for the PUD, as discussed in detail in the VTTM findings.

4. Development Agreement: The developer requests approval of a Development Agreement for this project, which will assure the developer of the development rights to the project as approved and will assure the City that the off-site improvements and community benefits (such as the park, public realm improvements, and improvements to City parks) will be completed if development is commenced (Attachment I). The Development Agreement ties issuance of building permits and certificates of occupancy to the achievement of certain milestones by the developer, to ensure that necessary onsite and off-site improvements are carried out and completed prior to the time at which these improvements will be needed by residents and the community. The Planning Commission supported the Development Agreement request, as it provides additional community benefits through on- and off-site improvements related to the project, including development of the on-site park and improvements to the off-site City parks adjacent to the PUD. The Development Agreement must be adopted by Ordinance, which requires City Council approval.

5. General Plan Conformity Certification: The developer requests vacation of the segment of Baker Street between Golden Avenue and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property, and vacation of unused right-of-way adjacent to Wardlow Road. Vacation of Baker Street is a requirement for project approval, since the PUD Ordinance specifies that a PUD cannot be divided by a public street. When vacated, the full width of the Baker Street right-of-way will become part of the PUD site, and a maintenance access easement will be provided to Los Angeles County and the City of Long Beach for access to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District parcel to the west.

General Plan Conformity Findings
Before the City Council can approve an application for the vacation of public right-of-way, a finding of conformity with the maps and policies of the General Plan must be made by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission made these findings in the positive on September 1, 2022. These findings are presented below for the record of proceedings.

The General Plan consists of 13 elements; each element carries the same authority concerning land use issues. The Planning Commission reviewed this project's conformance with all elements of the General Plan, and the proposed vacation was found to be in conformance with

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 9 of 14 ends

all applicable elements. A review of the relevant elements of the General Plan pertaining to the vacation of Baker Street and unused portions of right-of-way on Wardlow Road adjacent to the project site, and General Plan consistency findings for the same, are presented below.

Land Use Element Consistency
The 2019 LUE divides the City into 14 land use districts, which provide general guidance as to the appropriate type and density of land uses. Baker Street is located within the FCN PlaceType, while the unused Wardlow Road right-of-way adjacent to the project site is located within the OS (Open Space) PlaceType. The development site itself is located within the FCN PlaceType as well. Baker Street would be vacated to become a pedestrian path and maintenance access road to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District parcel to the west of the project site; this would be consistent with the FCN PlaceType, which permits low-tomoderate-density residential development and associated accessory uses of land. The unused public right-of-way on Wardlow Road consists of several stair-step-shaped slivers of land varying in width from approximately 25 feet to approximately 59 feet, with a length equal to the project's frontage on Wardlow Road of approximately 675 feet. This area would become part of the required 30-foot setback between Wardlow Road and the PUD's buildings, and would be improved from its vacant dirt state to landscaped open space. The City will retain a slope easement over the portion of this area that comprises the foot of the embankment of the Wardlow Road bridge over the LA River.

According to the LUE, a subdivision approval (which category would include the proposed vacations) is considered consistent with the LUE when the density of the proposed subdivision meets the PlaceType's residential density. In this case, the vacation of the Baker Street and unused right-of-way portions of Wardlow Road to become part of the development site would be consistent, as the intensity of the proposed development is consistent with the LUE. Further, the LUE states that a development project is considered consistent when the proposed development carries out the policies of the LUE and fulfills the intent of the Place Type density and intensity levels. The overall development project is consistent with the PlaceType, and therefore approval of the street vacations is consistent with the LUE of the General Plan.

Mobility Element Consistency
The City's Mobility Element is aimed at transforming Long Beach into a city of flexible, convenient, affordable, and energy-efficient transportation options for residents and visitors alike. The public street to be vacated, consisting of Baker Street between Golden Avenue and the Los Angeles County parcel to the west, and portions of unused right-of-way on Wardlow Road, have been found by the Public Works Department as no longer necessary for present or prospective public use or convenience. Existing rights-of-way (Wardlow Road, Golden Avenue, and Baker Street east of Golden) provide adequate vehicular and pedestrian access to the development site. The proposed vacations therefore would not prove detrimental to the movement of people and goods to the subject site, and Baker Street provides no through traffic or connectivity to any other property except the Los Angeles County Flood Control District

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 10 of 14 ends

property to the west, for which a maintenance access easement will be reserved for the County and the City. The proposed vacations are consistent with the Mobility Element.

Site History
A brief history of the development site is discussed below for inclusion in the record of proceedings. More detail can be found in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project, which is discussed below in the Environmental Review section of this report.

From 1926 to 1998, the project site was used for the treatment of oil field production brines, water, and wastewater, and other fluid by-products generated by oil production activities in the area. Initially, the water treatment process occurred in settling basins designed and constructed to remove oil and sediment from the production water. The treated water was discharged to the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD) sewer system under a permit issued by LACSD. Crude oil was recovered in the treatment process for recycling as a by-product. A water treatment facility was constructed on site in 1959, consisting of five circular concretewalled skimming basins and associated pumps, above ground storage tanks (ASTs), pipelines, and related small buildings and facilities. The treatment plant was located north of the two rectangular-shaped, clay-lined settling basins in the southern portion of the site, south of Baker Street. A settling pond was located north of Baker Street. The facility ceased operations in 1998.

In October 2000, the Long Beach Fire Department (LBFD) directed that liquid hydrocarbon products, wastewater, and sludge be removed from the site and that hydrocarbon impacted soils and groundwater be remediated. Buildings, ASTs, and related aboveground structures were cleaned, demolished, and disposed of offsite in 2000 and 2001. In 2002, the LBFD directed that liquid hydrocarbon products, wastewater, and sludge be removed from the site under a Site Remediation Permit issued by the City, coordinated with the LBFD, and the City's Department of Health and Human Services (LBDHHS). Soil and groundwater impacted by hydrocarbons were required to be remediated under the oversight of the LBDHHS and Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). A Consent Decree directed that remediation of Basin 1 take place in accordance with the standards specified by LBDHHS in 2002. These standards were described in a series of workplans prepared by the site owner and approved by the regulatory agencies. These workplans identified requirements for boring, soil sampling, monitoring wells, and soil remediation through a bioremediation filtration process. The process of bioremediation involves incorporating microorganisms into hydrocarbon contaminated soil to convert the hydrocarbon compounds into harmless products.

Regular tilling of the soil to incorporate and activate microorganisms is ongoing. Other ongoing activities include groundwater monitoring for hydrocarbon plume and arsenic presence in the groundwater.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 11 of 14 ends

VOCs. Once the VOCs and SVOCs are removed from the soil, they are delivered to an aboveground treatment system where the treated emissions are released. In April 2015, additional VES units were employed in the northeastern part of the Project site. LARWQCB further approved the implementation of Tesoro Expanded Remedial Action Plan for additional VES wells on February 8, 2017, and further amended the plan on December 27, 2018. The amended Tesoro Expanded Remedial Action Plan involves the installation of 12 horizontal VES wells and four angled VES wells to extend beneath Golden Avenue from the east side of the project site and five vertical VES wells beneath the project site. Continuous environmental testing and investigations were conducted from the early 1980s to 2019, alongside bioremediation efforts on site from the 1980s under permits issued by the City. The test data from these investigations were used to develop the Remedial Action Plan (RAP).

The RAP defines the scope of the remediation activities and develops a plan of action to achieve cleanup goals. The RAP needs to be completed to allow the issuance of a No Further Action determination by the lead enforcement agencies, which in this case are both the LBDHHS and LARWQCB. Approval and implementation of the RAP will be required prior to development of the proposed residential uses. Site conditions, the RAP, and cleanup history and requirements are described in greater detail in the EIR and appendices.

There has been significant public interest in the potential development of this private property site as a public park, to be acquired, remediated, and developed by the City. However, due to the cost of property acquisition, the cost of site remediation, and the cost of park development, such an undertaking is beyond the City's fiscal abilities. On September 15, 2016, the City Manager presented a memo to the City Council evaluating funding for City acquisition, cleanup, park development, and other funding sources for this specific property, including potential grant funding sources from outside agencies and organizations (Attachment J). The memo reported that most of the available grant funding opportunities would not be likely funding sources for acquisition, cleanup, and development of this site as a park, due to the large size and significant remediation hurdles this property presents, as well as the low funding amounts typically available through such grants.

Additionally, this site was again evaluated and dismissed from consideration in the Park Acquisition Feasibility Report provided to the City Council by the City Manager on April 5, 2021 (Attachment K). The report details how the property was not identified as one of nine opportunity sites due to the significant remediation required, and describes the 2003-2004 City effort to acquire this property, which ultimately failed because there was not a willing seller and the City was not willing to use eminent domain to take the property. The report goes on to describe the continuing conditions (cost of acquisition, unlikeliness of a willing seller, high remediation costs, and need for use of eminent domain) that make it infeasible for the City to acquire, remediate, and develop this property as a park today.

Public Hearing Notice
A notice of public hearing was mailed on October 31, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 21.21 of the Long Beach Municipal Code. A notice of public hearing

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 12 of 14 ends

also was published in the Long Beach Press-Telegram on October 31, 2022, also in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 21.21. Approximately 23 public comments were received at the time of the Planning Commission hearing on September 1, 2022, and additional comments have been received since that date. These comments generally are in opposition to the project and raise the following areas of concern: the need for park space in west Long Beach; the need for access to the LA River and development of the LA River master plans; traffic and parking concerns; concerns over the site contamination and remediation process; the site's proximity to freeways for residential development; and concerns over building height (Attachment L). City staff prepared written responses by topic to the verbal and written comments received up to the Planning Commission hearing in memorandum form, which was provided to the Planning Commission prior to the hearing; additionally, City staff has since prepared further responses to verbal and written public comments received at and after the Planning Commission hearing (Attachment M).

Environmental Review
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR-07-20) was prepared for the River Park Residential Development Project (SCH#202120492) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21100 and 21100.1, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 (Attachment N). A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR was distributed to public agencies and made available for public review and comment for a CEQA-required 30-day NOP review period that started on February 25, 2021 and ended on March 29, 2021. The City received 26 written comments during this NOP review period. A Scoping Meeting was held during this review period, on March 24, 2021, to further solicit public comment on the scope and content of the EIR.

The Draft EIR was distributed to public agencies and made available for public review and comment for a 60-day EIR review period that started on January 18, 2022 and ended on March 21, 2022. The City received 15 separate written comments on the Draft EIR during this review period. These written comments and the City's expert's written responses to these comments are provided in the Final EIR. This Final EIR also includes edits and clarifications to the Draft EIR text based on public comments, expert advice, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Text edits provided in the Final EIR did not substantially alter the Draft EIR environmental analysis or change the conclusions of the Draft EIR regarding potential project environmental impacts. The Final EIR determined that the project, in compliance with all recommended mitigation measures, would not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.

The project will be subject to the MMRP prepared for the EIR, which establishes mitigation measures that apply to the project. These mitigation measures pertain to air quality, biology, geology and seismicity, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, traffic and circulation, and tribal cultural resources.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 13 of 14 ends

The preparation and public availability of this EIR has been carried out in compliance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify EIR-07-20.

This matter was reviewed by Assistant City Attorney Dawn McIntosh and Revenue Management Officer Geraldine Alejo on September 21, 2022.

TIMING CONSIDERATIONS
The Development Services Department is required to transmit the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council within 60 days of positive action by the Planning Commission, per Section 21.25.103 of the Zoning Regulations. The Planning Commission made a positive recommendation on this project's requested actions on September 1, 2022.

However, due to extenuating circumstances, the applicant agreed to defer transmittal of this application to the City Council until the scheduled hearing date of November 15, 2022. Timely conclusion of this matter is now required under both 21.25.103 and the California Housing Accountability Act.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no cost to the City associated with the recommendation. The Development Agreement specifies that any cost related to improvements and enhancements within the rightof-way will be paid for by the developer and includes a traffic signal, enhancements to the Wrigley Heights Dog Park, and development and maintenance of a publicly accessible park on private land adjacent to Baker Street Park. This recommendation has no staffing impact beyond the normal budgeted scope of duties and is consistent with existing City Council priorities.

There is no local job impact associated with this recommendation.

SUGGESTED ACTION:

Approve recommendation.
~d,K
CHRISTOPHER KOO~

ACTING DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ATTACHMENTS: RESOLUTION

ORDINANCES

A- PC STAFF REPORT

B - LOCATION MAP

C - SITE AERIAL PHOTO

D-PLANS
APPROVED:

THOMAS B. MODICA

CITY MANAGER

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
November 15, 2022

Page 14 of 14 ends

E - ZONE CHANGE MAP

F-FINDINGS

G - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
H - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP No. 82712

I - DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
J - FUNDING EVALUATION: OIL OPERATORS, INC. PROPERTY MEMO

K- OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION REPORT

L - PUBLIC COMMENTS

M - WRITTEN RESPONSES TO VERBAL AND WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS

N - PROJECT EIR AND ATTACHMENTS
1 EWM:ag A22-02355 (10-14-2022)
01453561.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LONG BEACH CERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE RIVERPARK

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2021020492) HAS BEEN

COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS

OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
AND STATE AND LOCAL GUIDELINES; AND MAKING

CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS RELATIVE

THERETO
WHEREAS, by and through Peter Vanek for Integral Communities and now The River Park Project Owner, LLC, has proposed the Riverpark Residential Development Project (“Project”), a new residential Planned Unit Development located on an approximately 20.4-acre site in north-central Long Beach just north of Wardlow Road between Golden Avenue and Interstate 710 (Long Beach Freeway). The Project location is further described as 712 Baker Street, Long Beach, Los Angeles County Assessor ID Numbers 7203-002-001, 7203-002-005, 7203-002-007, 7203-002-008, 7203-00-2009, and 7203-002-010. The proposed Project would involve subdividing the 20.4-acre project site and developing it into a residential Planned Unit Development of 226 units consisting of 74 two-story detached single-family homes, 99 two-story row townhouses, and 53 three-story carriage townhouses located on 15.53 acres with a privately-owned and maintained park, which will be open to the public in the same manner as a City park, to be developed on the remaining 4.81 acres of property. The development would also include landscaping, resident amenities including [a recreation center with a pool, spa, and clubhouse, and access to the pedestrian/bicycle path along the Los Angeles River], garage parking spaces 2 EWM:ag A22-02355 (10-14-2022)
01453561.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 (a two-car garage for each home), and private on-street guest parking spaces; and Said Project is more fully described in the Riverpark Residential Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020492) (DEIR), a copy of which DEIR, including the complete proposed Project description, is incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, word for word; and WHEREAS, Project implementation will require certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and approval of the requests for a Zone Change, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Site Plan Review, and Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City began an evaluation of the proposed project by issuing a Notice of Preparation (NOP) that was circulated from February 25, 2021 to March 29, 2021. A Notice of Completion was prepared and filed with the State Office of Planning and Research on January 18, 2022. The DEIR was completed in January 2022, and circulated between January 18, 2022 and March 21, 2022; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the DEIR and FEIR and the Project. At said time, the Planning Commission determined that the DEIR and FEIR were fully compliant with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines and recommended that the City Council certify the DEIR and FEIR as being fully compliant with CEQA and that the City Council approve all applied for project entitlements as previously described in this resolution and in the DEIR; and WHEREAS, implementation and construction of the Project constitutes a “project” as defined by CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq., and the City of Long Beach is the Lead Agency for the Project under CEQA; and WHEREAS, it was determined during the initial processing of the Project that it could have potentially significant effects on the environment, requiring the preparation of an EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared full and complete responses to the comments received on the DEIR, and distributed the responses in accordance with Public Resources Code section 21092.5; and
3 EWM:ag A22-02355 (10-14-2022)
01453561.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information in, and the comments to, the DEIR and the responses thereto, and the FEIR at a duly noticed City Council meeting held on November 15, 2022, at which time evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has read and considered all environmental documentation comprising the FEIR, including the DEIR, comments and the responses to comments, and errata (if any) included in the FEIR, and has determined that the FEIR considers all potentially significant environmental impacts of the Project and is complete and adequate and fully complies with all requirements of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the City Council evaluated and considered all significant impacts, mitigation measures, and project alternatives identified in the FEIR; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Long Beach does hereby find, determine and resolve that:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as though fully set forth.

Section 2. The City Council finds that the FEIR is adequate and has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 3. The City Council finds that the FEIR, which reflects the City Council’s independent judgment and analysis, is hereby adopted, approved, and certified as complete and adequate under CEQA.

Section 4. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and State CEQA Guidelines section 15091, the City Council has reviewed and hereby adopts the CEQA Findings and Facts in Support of Findings for the Riverpark Project as shown on the attached Exhibit “A”, which document is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full, word for word.

Section 5. That the FEIR identifies certain significant environmental effects that would result if the Project is approved. All environmental effects can feasibly be avoided or mitigated and will be avoided or mitigated by the imposition of mitigation 4 EWM:ag A22-02355 (10-14-2022)
01453561.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 measures included with the FEIR. [Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City Council has reviewed and hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as shown on Exhibit “B”, which document is incorporated herein by reference as though set forth in full, word for word, together with any adopted corrections or modifications thereto, and further finds that the mitigation measures identified in the FEIR are feasible, and specifically makes each mitigation measure a condition of project approval.]
Section 6. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15091(e), the record of proceedings relating to this matter has been made available to the public at, among other places, the Department of Development Services, 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 2nd Floor, Long Beach, California, and is, and has been, available for review during normal business hours.

Section 7. The information provided in the various staff reports submitted in connection with the Project, the corrections and modifications to the DEIR, and FEIR made in response to comments and any errata which were not previously re-circulated, and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony at the public hearing, do not represent significant new information so as to require re-circulation of the DEIR pursuant to the Public Resources Code.

Section 8. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting this resolution. ///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
5 EWM:ag A22-02355 (10-14-2022)
01453561.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Long Beach at its meeting of _________________________, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers:

Noes: Councilmembers:

Absent: Councilmembers:

Recusal(s): Councilmembers:

City Clerk
1 CEQA FINDINGS OF FACT
River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
September 2022

INTRODUCTION
Section 21081 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15091 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines require a public agency, prior to approving a project, to identify significant impacts of the project and make findings for each of the significant impacts. The possible findings are:
• Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the final EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a)(1))
• Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a)(2)) • Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15091, subd. (a)(3)) The findings presented herein are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Initial Study, Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”), Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”) – the DEIR and FEIR are collectively referred to herein as the “EIR”, and upon other substantial evidence, both oral and written, which has been prepared for or provided to the environmental record of the RiverPark Residential Project (the Project; SCH No. 2021020492).

SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION BACKGROUND
After receiving an application from the Project, the City of Long Beach (the City) caused an Initial Study to be prepared in accordance with Section 15063(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 15082 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City then circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to State, regional and local agencies and to members of the public for a 30-day period ending on April 12, 2021. The purpose of the NOP was to formally inform the public that the City was preparing a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Project, and to solicit input regarding the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the DEIR.

The DEIR evaluated in detail the potential effects of the Project. The DEIR was circulated for a public review period from January 18, 2022, through March 21, 2022. Pursuant to Section 15088 of the CEQA Guidelines, Exhibit A
River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
2 the City reviewed all comments received during the review periods for the DEIR and prepared a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR).

The Draft and FEIR together are intended to serve as an informational document for public agency decision makers and the general public regarding objectives, components and effects of the Project. The DEIR, FEIR, staff reports, testimony, technical studies, appendices, plans, specifications, figures, exhibits, and other materials that constitute the Project record are on file and available for public examination at https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ and during normal business hours at the Long Beach City Hall, 411 W. Ocean Boulevard, 2
nd Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802.

SECTION 2. GENERAL FINDINGS
The City Council hereby finds that:

1. The EIR has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Public Resources Code §§21000 et seq. and the State CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, §§15000 et seq. (“CEQA Guidelines”)

2. The EIR provides objective information to assist the decision makers and the public at large in their consideration of the environmental consequences of the project and also finds that the DEIR and FEIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City has based its actions on full appraisal of all viewpoints, including all comments received up to the date of adoption of these findings, concerning the environmental impacts identified and analyzed in the DEIR.

3. Any textual refinements and errata that were identified subsequent to the public review of the DEIR do not represent substantial changes or new information that would result in changes in the environmental consequence of the project.

4. No evidence of new significant impacts as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5 have been received by the City Council and no substantial changes to the Project have occurred that would require further recirculation or a supplemental or subsequent EIR.

5. Substantial evidence for each finding made herein is contained in the EIR and the record of proceedings in the matter.

SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION The EIR concluded, based on substantial evidence in the record, that based on the general location, form and characteristics of the proposed project that the following impacts would not be significant: Aesthetics, Agricultural and Forestry Resources, Cultural Resources, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, and Wildfire.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
3 Finding: The City finds that for these topics, changes or alterations to the Project are neither required nor incorporated, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, subdivision (a)(1), CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, subdivision (a)(1) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4, subdivision (a)(3).

SECTION 4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT Consistent with Public Resources Code §21001.2 and CEQA Guidelines §15128, the DEIR focused its analysis on potentially significant impacts. The City has determined or assumed (see explanation below) that there was a potential of “significant” impacts in the following topic areas:
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Geology
• Hazards & Hazardous Materials
• Noise
• Transportation
• Tribal Cultural Resources.

Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081, subdivision (a)(1), changes or alterations have been incorporated into the Project to mitigate these impacts. Mitigation measures have been identified in the FEIR to lessen the effects of each significant impact. In addition, these mitigation measures have been listed in Mitigation Monitoring Program that shall be adopted by the City.

The City finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), based upon substantial evidence in the record, adoption of the identified mitigation measures would reduce the identified significant impacts to less-than-significant levels.

The potentially significant Project impacts, and the mitigation measures which have been adopted to mitigate the impacts to a less than significant level, are as follows:

1. Air Quality
Potential Significant Impacts.

Emission modeling performed for the DEIR indicated that construction of the Project could result potentially significant short-term air quality impacts in localized construction emissions of particulate matter (PM2.5).

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
4 In addition, SCAQMD requested that an analysis of the Project’s adjacency to the freeway be performed, and this analysis indicated a potential risk to future residents of exposure to diesel particulate from highway traffic.

The City has developed the mitigation measures listed below to be incorporated into the Project that would ensure potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1).

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures were identified in the EIR to address the potential for Air Quality impacts:

MM AQ-1. On-site construction equipment fleet must meet EPA Tier 4 Final standards for all offroad diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 hp and would require all construction equipment to be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices certified by CARB.

MM AQ-2 would incorporate the following design features to reduce potential cancer risk:
• Locate outdoor areas, such as balconies and courtyards, as far from the freeway and roadway segment as possible.
• Plant vegetation between residential receptors and the freeway. • Install, operate, and maintain a heating, ventilation, and air condition (HVAC) system that uses high-efficiency filters of Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 14 or higher for the residential units (suggested use of MERV 16);
• Locate the air intakes for the uses as far from the freeway as possible; and • Provide a disclosure letter to all new residents that discusses the potential risk from living within close proximity of the freeway and roadway segment and points out that opening windows reduces the effectiveness of implemented reduction measures and increases individuals’ exposure and hence risk.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

The mitigation listed above would be specific to the construction process associated with the Project and involve standards for construction equipment used on the Project site. These requirements would not have environmental effects other than the intended mitigation beyond the Project site.

Findings: The City finds that this mitigation measure would reduce the potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have adverse effects not already considered in the analysis.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
5 2. Biological Resources
Potential Significant Impacts.

While not identified during site surveys, the EIR concluded that there exists a potential for bird nests or burrows to be present on the site at the time of construction, and as such included mitigation to reduce those impacts to being less than significant. Furthermore, due to certain comments raised by the public during the public comment period and before the Planning Commission, the City agreed to include additional mitigation measures to further avoid impacts to burrowing owls and bats, in an abundance of caution, as described below. However, in doing so, the City is not altering its determination that there is not a possibility of a potential impact to these species.

Accordingly, the City has developed the mitigation measures listed below to be incorporated into the Project that would ensure any potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1).

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures were identified in the EIR to address the potential of impacts on bird nests or burrows, and/or certain bat species:

MM-BIO-1: Migratory Birds. To avoid impacts to birds nesting onsite, the following mitigation shall be implemented:
• Proposed ground clearing activities within 300 feet of potential nesting site should take place outside of the breeding bird season which generally runs from February 1– August

31. • If project activities cannot feasibly avoid the breeding bird season, beginning thirty days prior to the disturbance of suitable nesting habitat, the applicant shall arrange for weekly bird surveys to detect any protected native birds in the habitat to be removed and any other such habitat within properties adjacent to the project site, as access to adjacent areas allows. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist with experience in conducting breeding bird surveys. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of clearance/construction work If a protected native bird is found, the applicant shall delay all clearance/construction disturbance activities within 300 feet of suitable nesting habitat for the observed protected bird species until August 31. Alternatively, the Qualified Biologist could continue the surveys in order to locate any nests. If an active nest is located, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest or as determined by a qualified biological monitor, shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The buffer zone from the nest shall be established in the field with flagging and stakes. Construction River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
6 personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of the area. The applicant shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable State and Federal laws pertaining to the protection of native birds. Such record shall be submitted and received into the case file for the associated discretionary action permitting the project.

MM-BIO-2: The City shall perform a protocol-level survey for burrowing owls adhering to survey methods described in CDFW’s March 7, 2012, Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.

Burrowing owl protocol surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist on the Project site and within 100 feet (minimum) of the Project site where there is suitable habitat. In California, the burrowing owl breeding season extends From February 1 to August 31 with some variances by geographic location and climatic conditions. Survey protocol for breeding season owl surveys states to conduct four survey visits: 1) at least one site visit between February 15 and April 15, and 2) a minimum of three survey visits, at least three weeks apart, between April 15 and July 15, with at least one visit after June 15. If burrowing owls are identified, the applicant shall prepare an Impact Assessment and Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan in accordance with the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. The Project Applicant shall contact CDFW to develop appropriate mitigation and management procedures. The applicant shall submit a final Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan to the City prior to the City issuing construction permits.

MM-BIO-3: If the Project will impact habitat supporting burrowing owls, Project Applicant shall be required to offset impacts on habitat supporting a Species of Special Concern at no less than 2:1. There should be no net loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Project Applicant should set aside replacement habitat. Replacement habitat should be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a local land conservancy or other appropriate entity, which should include an appropriate endowment to provide for the long-term management of mitigation lands.

MM-BIO-4: To avoid direct mortality of ground inhabiting species, a qualified biological monitor shall be on-site prior to and during ground and habitat disturbing activities to move out of harm’s way special status species or other wildlife of low mobility that would be injured or killed by grading or Project-related construction activities. It should be noted that the temporary relocation of on-site wildlife does not constitute effective mitigation for the purposes of offsetting Project impacts associated with habitat loss. If the Project requires protected species to be removed, disturbed, or otherwise handled, the applicant shall obtain all required appropriate state and federal permits.

MM-BIO-5: The Project applicant shall report any special status species detected by completing and submitting CNDDB Online Field Survey Form to the extent any such species are detected. The data entry should also list pending development as a threat and then update this occurrence after River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
7 impacts have occurred. The Project Applicant shall provide CDFW with confirmation of data submittal.

MM-BIO-6: Project Applicant shall avoid using any rodenticides and second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides during Project activities.

MM-BIO-7 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall provide the City with proof of retention of a qualified biologist to implement this mitigation measure. Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist no more than 30 days prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and ground disturbing activities if within the maternity season (March 1 to August 31). If no active roosts are present, then trees shall be removed within two weeks following the survey. If active bat roosts are found, then then the following shall be implemented, as appropriate:
a) If active bat roosts are present, a qualified bat biologist shall determine the species of bats present and the type of roost (i.e., day roost, night roost, maternity roost). If the biologist determines that the roosting bats are not a special-status species and the roost is not being used as a maternity roost and direct removal of active roosts is required, then the bats may be evicted from the roost by a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing and implementing bat mitigation and exclusion plans. If special-status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present, but no direct removal of active roosts will occur, a qualified bat biologist shall determine appropriate avoidance measures, which may include implementation of a construction-free buffer around the active roost. b) If special-status bat species or a maternity roost of any bat species is present and direct removal of habitat (roost location) will occur, then a qualified bat biologist experienced in developing bat mitigation and exclusion plans shall develop a mitigation plan to compensate for the lost roost site. Removal of the roost shall only occur when bats are not present in the roost. The mitigation plan shall detail the methods of excluding bats from the roost and the plans for a replacement roost in the vicinity of the project site. The plan shall include: (1) a description of the species targeted for mitigation; (2) a description of the existing roost or roost sites; (3) methods to be used to exclude the bats if necessary; (4) methods to be used to secure the existing roost site to prevent its reuse prior to removal; (5) the location for a replacement roost structure; (6) design details for the construction of the replacement roost; (7) monitoring protocols for assessing replacement roost use; (8) a schedule for excluding bats, demolishing of the existing roost, and construction of the replacement roost; and (9) contingency measures to be implemented if the replacement roosts do not function as designed.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
8 c) All potential roost trees shall be removed in a manner approved by a qualified bat biologist, which may include presence of a biological monitor. d) All construction activity in the vicinity of an active maternity roost shall be limited to daylight hours.
e) Results of the survey shall be submitted to the City prior to removal of the trees. If additional measures are required under (a) through (d), the submittal to the City will include those additional measures.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

The mitigation measures identified above would be conducted within the Project site and would not have effects beyond the Project site. As such, the City determines that implementation of these mitigation measures would not result in any potentially significant impact to the surrounding environment, nor any significant secondary effects that were not otherwise addressed in the EIR.

Finding. The City finds that construction of the Project could result in disturbance of bird nests or burrows.

Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), the City has incorporated the mitigation measures listed above into the Project. Furthermore, while the City has not altered its determination that the Project would not potentially impact bat populations, in an abundance of caution, the City will assume that there could be potential impacts to those species, and as such incorporates the additional mitigation measure listed above.

The City finds that these mitigation measures would reduce any potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have any additional effects beyond the site nor would have adverse effects not already considered in the analysis.

3. Geology & Soils
Potential Significant Impacts.

While not known to be present, the EIR concluded that there exists a potential for the site to contain subsurface paleontological resources. The City has developed the mitigation measures listed below to be incorporated into the Project that would ensure potential impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1).

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures were identified in the EIR to address the potential of impacts on subsurface paleontological resources:

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
9 MM GEO-1: Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) Prior to the start of the proposed Project activities, all field personnel will receive a worker’s environmental awareness training on paleontological resources. The training will provide a description of the laws and ordinances protecting fossil resources, the types of fossil resources that may be encountered in the Project area, the role of the paleontological monitor, outline steps to follow in the event that a fossil discovery is made and provide contact information for the Project Paleontologist. The training will be developed by the Project Paleontologist and can be delivered concurrent with other training including cultural, biological, safety, etc.

MM GEO-2: Paleontological Mitigation Monitoring
Prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities, a professional paleontologist will be retained to prepare and implement a paleontological resource mitigation and monitoring plan (PRMMP) for the proposed Project. The PRMMP will describe the monitoring required during excavations that extend into older Quaternary (Pleistocene) age sediments, and the location of areas deemed to have a high paleontological resource potential. Monitoring will entail the visual inspection of excavated or graded areas and trench sidewalls. If the Project Paleontologist determines full-time monitoring is no longer warranted, based on the geologic conditions at depth, he or she may recommend that monitoring be reduced or cease entirely.

In the event that a paleontological resource is discovered, the monitor will have the authority to temporarily divert the construction equipment around the find until it is assessed for scientific significance and, if appropriate, collected. If the resource is determined to be of scientific significance, the Project Paleontologist shall complete the following:

If fossils are discovered, all work in the immediate vicinity should be halted to allow the paleontological monitor, and/or Project Paleontologist to evaluate the discovery and determine if the fossil may be considered significant. If the fossils are determined to be potentially significant, the Project Paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) should recover them following standard field procedures for collecting paleontological as outlined in the PRMMP prepared for the project.

Typically, fossils can be safely salvaged quickly by a single paleontologist and not disrupt construction activity. In some cases, larger fossils (such as complete skeletons or large mammal fossils) require more extensive excavation and longer salvage periods. In this case the paleontologist should have the authority to temporarily direct, divert or halt construction activity to ensure that the fossil(s) can be removed in a safe and timely manner.

The PRMMP will identify the museum that has agreed to accept fossils that may be discovered during project-related excavations. Upon completion of fieldwork, all significant fossils collected will be prepared in a properly equipped laboratory to a point ready for curation. Preparation may include the removal of excess matrix from fossil materials and stabilizing or repairing specimens.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
10 During preparation and inventory, the fossils specimens will be identified to the lowest taxonomic level practical prior to curation at an accredited museum. The fossil specimens must be delivered to the accredited museum or repository no later than 90 days after all fieldwork is completed. The cost of curation will be assessed by the repository and will be the responsibility of the client.

MM GEO-3: Final Paleontological Mitigation Report: Salvage of Fossils Upon completion of ground disturbing activity (and curation of fossils if necessary) the Project Paleontologist should prepare a final mitigation and monitoring report outlining the results of the mitigation and monitoring program. The report should include discussion of the location, duration and methods of the monitoring, stratigraphic sections, any recovered fossils, and the scientific significance of those fossils, and where fossils were curated.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

Finding. The City finds that construction of the Project could result in disturbance to subsurface paleontological resources. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), the City has incorporated the mitigation measures listed above into the Project. The City finds that these mitigation measures would reduce the potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have any adverse effects not already considered in the analysis.

4. Hazardous Materials
Potential Significant Impacts. Due to former activities within the Project site, the Project includes the remediation of the Project Site to a level that will be safe for the future uses of the Property. As such, certain impacts were recognized in the EIR as being potentially significant due to the exposure of potentially contaminated material from the Project Site.

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures were identified in the EIR to address the potential hazards from the existing site conditions.

MM HAZ-1: Prior to earthwork activities, remnants of underground piping still present on the Project site shall be tested by a qualified asbestos consultant, and if asbestos is detected in amounts exceeding regulatory disposal criteria, the pipe will be transported for disposal to a facility licensed to accept asbestos-containing waste.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
11 MM HAZ-2: Prior to Project earthwork activities, the RAP shall be approved by LARWQCB. All remedial work described in the RAP shall be implemented under the supervision of a statelicensed geologist or engineer and the LARWQCB or the DTSC if so specified by LARWQCB.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

In regards to MM HAZ-1, this mitigation measure will be conducted in accordance with existing regulations, including any hazardous waste regulations. As such, this measure will not result in any significant effects beyond the Project Site.

In regards to MM HAZ-2, incorporation of the implementation of an approved remedial action plan is an integral part of the Project. Indeed, the impacts of the proposed remediation efforts described in the RAP have already been assessed in other portions of the EIR. As such, there are no potential secondary effects of the implementation of the RAP that have not already been analyzed as part of the EIR.

Finding. The City finds that the Project could result in ground disturbance that could expose subsurface contamination which might pose risks to the public. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), the City has incorporated the mitigation measures listed above into the Project. The City finds that these mitigation measures would reduce the potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have any additional effects beyond the site nor would have adverse effects not already considered in the analysis.

5. Noise
Potential Significant Impacts. The EIR concluded that the close proximity of existing residential uses is such that construction of the Project could generate noise that could expose those uses to excess noise levels.

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure was identified in the EIR to address the potential for excess construction noise.

MM NOI-1: Construction Noise
The Applicant must utilize, without limitation, the following construction best management practices (BMPs):
• Shroud or shield all impact tools, and muffle or shield all intake and exhaust port on power equipment to reduce construction noise by 10 dB or more. • If feasible, schedule grading activities so as to avoid operating numerous pieces of heavyduty off-road construction equipment (e.g., backhoes, dozers, excavators, loaders, or rollers) simultaneously in close proximity to the boundary of properties of off-site noise River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
12 sensitive receptors surrounding the Project Site to reduce construction noise levels by approximately 14 dBA.
• Where feasible, temporary barriers including, without limitation, sound blankets on existing fences and walls, or freestanding portable sound walls, must be placed as close to the noise source or as close to the receptor as possible and break the line of sight between the source and receptor where modeled levels exceed applicable standards.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

The mitigation measure listed above is associated with construction management and equipment and as such would not have any additional effects beyond managing the noise generated by construction activities.

Finding. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), the City finds that the mitigation measure identified in the EIR would reduce the potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have any adverse effects not already considered in the analysis.

6. Transportation
Potential Significant Impacts. The EIR concluded that based on line-of-sight analysis of vehicle movements at the proposed access driveway on Wardlow Road, the proposed vehicle movements in and out of the Project at Wardlow Road could result in potential traffic hazards.

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measure was identified in the EIR to address the potential traffic hazard at the access point of the Project on Wardlow Road.

TRA-1: Traffic Signal
The Project Applicant shall install traffic signal related equipment to current CA MUTCD and/or City of Long Beach Standards, at the intersection of Wardlow Road and the proposed entry to the project, generally in conformance with the “Conceptual Traffic Signal Design” prepared by Subdivider, dated August 25, 2020. Installation of the traffic signal related equipment may include, but not be limited to the following:
i. Traffic Signal indicators to the most current City standard. ii. Vehicular detection shall be installed on all approaches to the signalized intersection. This may include presence, mid or advance detection per City direction. Options will include standard Type E loops or video detection. iii. All pedestrian push buttons and indicators shall be to the most current City Standards.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
13 iv. The Subdivider shall install Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption (EVPE) equipment. The equipment and installation must be completed per the most current City Standard.
v. The Subdivider shall install a GPS Module at the traffic signal. The GPS Modules create accurate time-based communications between nearby traffic signals. vi. The Subdivider shall install a new traffic signal controller based on the most current City Standard [McCain 2070 Controllers]. vi. Subdivider shall install 96 count fiber interconnect cable to the satisfaction of the City’s Traffic Engineer, but at a minimum from the proposed traffic signal to Magnolia Avenue. viii. Subdivider shall install flashing beacons, on overhead mast arms attached to utility poles, on both approaches to the proposed traffic signal, 450 feet from the stop limit line.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

The mitigation measure listed above would improve traffic safety off site at the access point for the Project. This would improve traffic safety along Wardlow Road, and remove the risk of a potential traffic hazard at the Project’s entrance. As such, the City determines that implementation of this mitigation measure would not result in any potentially significant impact to the surrounding environment, nor any significant secondary effects that were not otherwise addressed in the EIR.

7. Tribal Cultural Resources
Potential Significant Impacts. The EIR concluded that construction of the Project had the potential to unearth previously unknown subsurface Tribal Cultural Resources.

Mitigation Measures. The following mitigation measures were identified in the EIR to address the potential impacts on Tribal Cultural Resources:

MM TCR-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant
The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both ancestrally affiliated with the project area and approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the Native American Heritage Commission’s (NAHC) Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. A Native American monitor shall be retained by the Lead Agency or owner of the project to be on site to monitor all project-related, ground-disturbing construction activities (i.e., boring, grading, excavation, potholing, trenching, etc.). A monitor River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
14 associated with one of the NAHC recognized Tribal governments which have commented on the project shall provide the Native American monitor. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified.

The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project Site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the Site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs).

MM TCR-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, additional protective mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available.

The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources.

MM TCR-3: PRC Section 21083.2(b)
Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. All TCRs shall be returned to the Tribe. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to the Tribe or a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes.

MM TCR-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
15 American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone, within 24 hours, the NAHC and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.

Potential Secondary Effects. Section 15126.4(a)(1)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that the potential effects of a mitigation measure be discussed.

The mitigation measures listed above involve monitoring activities on site during Project construction.

These activities would be conducted within the Project Site and would not have effects beyond the Project Site, nor any secondary effects to the surrounding environment.

Finding. The City finds that construction of the Project could result in disturbance of subsurface Tribal Cultural Resources. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(1), the City has incorporated the mitigation measures listed above into the Project. The City finds that these mitigation measures would reduce the potential effects of the Project to a less than significant level and would not have any additional effects beyond the site.

SECTION 5. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS NOT FULLY MITIGATED TO A LEVEL OF LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT:

CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(c) requires that an EIR describe any significant impacts that cannot be avoided, even with the implementation of feasible mitigation measures.

Finding: The City finds that no significant unavoidable impacts have been identified.

SECTION 6: SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES Section 15126.2 (c) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR include discussion of irreversible environmental change. The Guidelines indicates that “uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued phases of the project may be irreversible since a large commitment of such resources makes removal or nonuse thereafter unlikely” and “irretrievable commitments of resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption is justified.” Impacts could consist of reduction in availability of resources; commitment of future generations to specific land uses; or accidents that cause irreversible damage.

The Project would involve the commitment of resources necessary for construction. This could include non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels. However, the Project is not expected to significantly increase the amount or rate of consumption of these resources as compared to existing conditions throughout the City and the region. Furthermore, the Project would comply with current applicable codes that would improve the efficient use of natural resources.

Once established, land use patterns can be difficult to change. As such, the Project would likely commit future generations to the form of development envisioned by the Project. This commitment to a pattern River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
16 of development is consistent with the vision of the City. As such, the commitment of resources for the Project is justified by the alignment of the Project with community goals.

The nature of the Project does not support any change in activities that could result in accidents that would likely cause irreversible damage.

Finding: The City finds that no significant irreversible environmental damage would result from the Project.

SECTION 7. CUMULATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Consistent with CEQA’s requirements, the EIR includes an analysis of cumulative impacts. CEQA defines “cumulative impacts” as two or more individual events that, when considered together, are considerable or will compound other environmental impacts. (State CEQA Guidelines, § 15355.) The Project would develop the site with a land use consistent with the City’s land use goals and applicable regulatory measures. The Project would support development and growth that is consistent with the growth forecasts of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which is the basis for the projected cumulative growth used by City’s and providers of utility systems.

Finding: The City finds that the Project would not have a considerable contribution to cumulative impacts.

SECTION 8: GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS
Section 15126.2 (e) of the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, requires that a Draft EIR include discussion of the potential growth-inducing impacts of a project. Growth-inducing impacts are defined as the ways a project could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. Such a discussion should also include projects that would remove obstacles to population growth and the characteristics of a project, which may encourage and/or facilitate other activities that, either individually or cumulatively, could significantly affect the environment. The CEQA Guidelines state that growth in an area should not be considered beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment.

The Project would develop the site with a land use consistent with the City’s land use goals and the growth forecasts of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).

Finding: The City finds that the Project would induce growth according to the goals of the City and in a way that minimizes effects on the environment.

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
17 SECTION 9. ALTERNATIVES
Where significant impacts are identified, Section 15126.6 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires EIRs to consider and discuss alternatives to the proposed actions as a way of avoiding the significant impacts. The range of alternatives required is governed by a “rule of reason” that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice. Alternatives are intended to be limited to those that would avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects of the Project and of those alternatives, the EIR need examine in detail only those that could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project.

Summary of Alternatives Considered: The City considered a No Project Alternative, which would continue the exiting condition of the site; a reduced density alternative and an only single-family residential alternative.

Finding: The City finds that no alternative has been identified that would be environmentally preferrable to the Project. These alternatives would create variations in impact levels but would not avoid any of the significant effects of the Project and would not achieve the City’s objectives as successfully as the Project.

Furthermore, no significant and unavoidable impacts were identified for the proposed Project; all potentially significant impacts could be mitigated to a less than significant level. Therefore, the City Council finds that it has considered and rejected the alternatives identified in the EIR.

SECTION 10. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM.

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City adopts the Mitigation Monitoring And Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for the Project. Implementation of the Mitigation Measures contained in the MMRP is hereby made a condition of approval of the Project.

SECTION 11. CERTIFICATION OF EIR:

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15090, the City as lead agency shall make the following certifications prior to approving the Project:

1. The FEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA;

2. The City Council finds that it has been presented with the FEIR, which it has reviewed and considered; and

3. The FEIR reflects the City‘s independent judgment and analysis.

In finding the EIR as adequate under CEQA, the City Council hereby adopts these CEQA Findings. In doing so, the City Council certifies the EIR based on the entirety of the record of proceedings and concludes that:

River Park Residential Project (SCH No.202120492)
City of Long Beach
CEQA Findings of Fact
September 2022
18 1. All significant environmental impacts from the implementation of the Project have been identified in the EIR and, with implementation of the mitigation measures identified, will be mitigated to a level of insignificance;

2. That a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project that could feasibly achieve most of the Project’s basic objectives but would avoid or substantially lessen the Project’s significant effects on the environment, have been considered and rejected in favor of the Project; and

3. Environmental, economic, social, and other considerations derived from the Project, as described herein and in the record of proceedings, make infeasible any alternatives to the Project or further mitigation measures beyond those incorporated into the Project.

Exhibit B
River Park Residential Project
1 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project
2 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project 3 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
MM-BIO-2: The City shall perform a protocol-level survey for 2012, Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. Burrowing owl protocol surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist on the Project site and within 100 feet (minimum) of the Project site where there is suitable habitat. In California, the burrowing owl breeding season extends From February 1 to August 31 with some variances by geographic location and climatic conditions. Survey protocol for breeding season owl surveys states to conduct four survey visits: 1) at least one site visit between February 15 and April 15, and 2) a minimum of three survey visits, at least three weeks apart, between April 15 and July 15, with at least one visit after June 15. If burrowing owls are identified, the applicant shall prepare an Impact Assessment and Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan in accordance with the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. The Project Applicant shall contact CDFW to develop appropriate mitigation and management procedures. The applicant shall submit a final Burrowing Owl Mitigation Plan to the City prior to the City issuing construction permits.

MM-BIO-3: If the Project will impact habitat supporting burrowing owls, Project Applicant shall be required to offset impacts on habitat supporting a Species of Special Concern at no less than 2:1. There should be no net loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Project Applicant should set aside replacement habitat. Replacement habitat should be protected in perpetuity under a conservation easement dedicated to a local land conservancy or other appropriate entity, which should include an River Park Residential Project 4 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
appropriate endowment to provide for the long-term management of mitigation lands.

MM-BIO-4: To avoid direct mortality of ground inhabiting species, a qualified biological monitor shall be on-site prior to and during ground and species or other wildlife of low mobility that would be injured or killed by grading or Project-related construction activities. It should be noted that the temporary relocation of on-site wildlife does not constitute effective mitigation for the purposes of offsetting Project impacts associated with habitat loss. If the Project requires protected species to be removed, disturbed, or otherwise handled, the applicant shall obtain all required appropriate state and federal permits.

MM-BIO-5: The Project applicant shall report any special status species detected by completing and submitting CNDDB Online Field Survey Form to the extent any such species are detected. The data entry should also list pending development as a threat and then update this occurrence after impacts have occurred. The Project Applicant shall provide CDFW with confirmation of data submittal.

MM-BIO 6: Project Applicant shall avoid using any rodenticides and second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides during Project activities.

River Park Residential Project
5 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project 6 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project
7 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project 8 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
The Project Applicant shall install traffic signal related equipment to current CA MUTCD and/or City of Long Beach Standards, at the intersection of Wardlow Road and the proposed entry to the project, generally in conformance with the Installation of the traffic signal related equipment may include, but not be limited to the following:
i. Traffic Signal indicators to the most current City standard. ii. Vehicular detection shall be installed on all approaches to the signalized intersection. This may include presence, mid or advance detection per City direction. Options will include standard Type E loops or video detection.
iii. All pedestrian push buttons and indicators shall be to the most current City Standards.
iv. The Subdivider shall install Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption (EVPE) equipment. The equipment and installation must be completed per the most current City Standard.
v. The Subdivider shall install a GPS Module at the traffic signal. The GPS Modules create accurate time-based
communications between nearby traffic signals. vi. The
Subdivider shall install a new traffic signal controller based River Park Residential Project 9 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
on the most current City Standard [McCain 2070
Controllers].
vi. Subdivider shall install 96 count fiber interconnect cable to minimum from the proposed traffic signal to Magnolia
Avenue. viii. Subdivider shall install flashing beacons, on overhead mast arms attached to utility poles, on both
approaches to the proposed traffic signal, 450 feet from the stop limit line.

River Park Residential Project 10 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022
River Park Residential Project 11 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022

River Park Residential Project 12 City of Long Beach
MMRP July 2022

1 EWM:ag A22-02924 09/22/2022
01449481.docx
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LONG BEACH AMENDING THE USE DISTRICT

MAP OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH AS SAID MAP HAS

BEEN ESTABLISHED AND AMENDED BY AMENDING
PORTIONS OF PART 15 OF SAID MAP FROM

COMMERCIAL STORAGE (CS), COMMERCIAL STORAGE

WITH HORSE OVERLAY (CS (H)) AND SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, STANDARD LOT (R-1-N) TO RESIDENTIAL,
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 15 DU/AC (RP-15) AND
RESIDENTIAL, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 15 DU/AC
WITH HORSE OVERLAY (RP-15 (H))
The City Council of the City of Long Beach ordains as follows:

Section 1. Environmental documentation having been prepared, received, considered, approved, and certified as required by law, and the City Council hereby finding that the proposed change will not adversely affect the character, livability or appropriate development of the surrounding area and that the proposed change is consistent with the goals, objectives and provisions of the General Plan, the official Use District Map of the City of Long Beach, as established and amended, is further amended by amending portions of Part 15 of said Map from Commercial Storage (CS), Commercial Storage with Horse Overlay (CS (H)) and Single-Family Residential, Standard Lot (R-1-N) to Residential Planned Unit Development, 15 du/ac (RP-15) and Residential, Planned Unit Development, 15 du/ac with Horse Overlay (RP-15 (H)).

Section 2. Those portions of Part 15 of said Map that are amended by this ordinance are depicted on Exhibit “A” which is attached hereto and by this reference 2 EWM:ag A22-02924 09/22/2022
01449481.docx
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 made a part of this ordinance and the official Use District Map of the City.

Section 3. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance by the City Council and cause it to be posted in three conspicuous places in the City of Long Beach, and it shall take effect on the thirty-first day after it is approved by the Mayor.

I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Long Beach at its meeting of __________________, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers:

Noes: Councilmembers:

Absent: Councilmembers:

Recusal(s): Councilmembers:

_________________________________
City Clerk
Approved: ________________ _________________________________ Mayor
R-1-N
CS
R-1-N
R-1-S
PR
P
R-4-R
IL P
CS
PR
PR

GOLDEN AVE
33RD WAY 33RD WAY

W WARDLOW RD

BAKER ST
34TH ST
W 35TH ST
38TH ST
W 37TH ST
W 36TH ST
±
AMENDMENT TO A PORTION OF PART 15
OF THE USE DISTRICT MAP Rezoning Case #
2003-24
Area to be modified from
CS (Commercial Storage)
to
RP-15
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac)
Area to be modified from
CS (H)
(Commercial Storage, Horse overlay)
to
RP-15 (H)
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac, Horse overlay)
Area to be modified from
R-1-N
(Single-family Residential, standard lot)
to
RP-15
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac)
Area to be modified from R-1-N to RP-15
Area to be modified from CS to RP-15 Area to be modified from CS(H) to RP-15(H)

EXHIBIT A
1 EWM:ag A22-02924 (09-22-2022)
01448508.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF LONG BEACH APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER

21.29 OF THE LONG BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE; DIRECTING

THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT EMBODYING THE APPLICATION AND KEY

TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; AND AUTHORIZING

AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE, ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF LONG BEACH, A DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT WITH THE RIVER PARK PROJECT OWNER,

LLC, FOR THE RIVERPARK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT
The City Council of the City of Long Beach ordains as follows:

Section 1. Recitals.

A. In response to requirements of State law, the City Council has enacted Chapter 21.29 of the Long Beach Municipal Code to establish procedures and requirements for the consideration of Development Agreements upon application of persons having a legal or equitable interest in property proposed to be subject to such an Agreement.

B. The City has conducted discussions initiated by property interest-holders relating to their Application for a Development Agreement in that development commonly known as the Riverpark project development located on an approximately 20.4-acre site in north-central Long Beach just north of Wardlow Road between Golden Avenue and Interstate 710 (Long 2 EWM:ag A22-02924 (09-22-2022)
01448508.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 Beach Freeway).

C. The application having been deemed complete by the Director of Development Services, and environmental review having been prepared as required by law, the Long Beach Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on this matter on September 1, 2022. Following that hearing, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that it approve the application for said Development Agreement.

D. Following receipt of a written report of such action by the Planning Commission, and notice having been duly given by the City Clerk in accordance with State law, the City Council conducted a public hearing on this matter on November 15, 2022. At such public hearing, all persons were given a full and fair opportunity to be heard and to present written or oral testimony.

E. Following such public hearing, the City Council deliberated, considered and acted upon the application in accordance with provisions of law and as set forth in this Ordinance.

Section 2. Development Agreement Incorporated by Reference A. An application for a Development Agreement has been filed with the Director of Development Services by The Long Beach Project, LLC and DEM Investment Company, LLC, by and through Peter Vanek for Integral Communities and now The River Park Project Owner, LLC.

B. The application, along with the draft of the proposed terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and relevant exhibits relating to the application and Development Agreement, is hereby incorporated into this Ordinance as Exhibit “A”.

Section 3. Findings
A. Based on facts supporting such findings as set forth in the record of the public hearing conducted by the City Council on November 15, 2022, 3 EWM:ag A22-02924 (09-22-2022)
01448508.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 and incorporated herein by reference, relating to the Development Agreement listed and incorporated in Section 2 of this Ordinance, the City Council hereby finds:

1. That the Development Agreement is consistent with the Long Beach General Plan and any and all applicable specific plans, and

2. That the Agreement will promote the general welfare and public interest of the City of Long Beach.

Section 4. Application Approval
A. Based upon such findings and upon recommendation of the Long Beach Planning Commission, and after a full, fair and duly noticed public hearing as required by law, the City Council hereby approves the application for the Development Agreement as such application is incorporated into this Ordinance by reference as set forth in Subsection 2.B. of this Ordinance.

B. Accordingly, the City Attorney is directed to prepare the Development Agreement embodying the terms and conditions of the application by and between The River Park Project Owner, LLC, and the City of Long Beach, as approved by the City Council on the condition that such Development Agreement and its exhibits shall be in substantially that form and content as is as set forth in Section 2 and Exhibit “A” of this Ordinance.

C. As thus prepared, and when approved as to form by the City Attorney, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City.

D. The City Clerk shall cause said Development Agreement to be recorded in the office of the Registrar/Recorder of the County of Los Angeles no later than ten (10) days after its execution.

Section 5. As provided in Subsection 21.29.030.F of the Long Beach Municipal Code, this Ordinance may be subjected to referendum in the manner provided by law.
4 EWM:ag A22-02924 (09-22-2022)
01448508.DOCX
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CHARLES PARKIN, City Attorney 411 West Ocean Boulevard, 9th Floor Long Beach, CA 90802-4664 Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance by the City Council and cause it to be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the City of Long Beach, and it shall take effect on the thirty-first (31st) day after it is approved by the Mayor.

I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the City Council of the City of Long Beach at its meeting of ____________________, 2022, by the following vote:

Ayes: Councilmembers:

Noes: Councilmembers:

Absent: Councilmembers:

Recusal(s): Councilmembers:

City Clerk
Approved:
(Date) Mayor
-1-
Recording Requested by And
When Recorded Return to:

City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: Scott Kinsey
[Exempt From Recording Fee Per Gov. Code §6103]

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
(River Park)
THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this ____ day of __________, 2022, pursuant to an action taken by the City Council of the City of Long Beach at its meeting held on ___________________, 2022, by and among the City of Long Beach, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and The River Park Project Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). City and Owner hereafter are referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS

1. City is authorized to enter into development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property pursuant to Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division I of Title 7 of the California Government Code commencing with Section 65864 (the “Development Agreement Law”), and Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution.

2. City has enacted an ordinance, incorporated into the Long Beach Municipal Code as Title 21, Chapter 21.29 that establishes the procedures and requirements for its consideration of such development agreements upon application by, or on behalf of, persons having legal or equitable interests in real property pursuant to the Development Agreement Law and applicable City General and Specific Plans, policies and regulations.

3. Owner represents that it has an equitable interest in approximately twenty (20) acres of undeveloped real property in Long Beach, as more specifically described in Exhibit “A” (the “Subject Property”).

4. Owner has proposed a project for the Subject Property consisting of approximately 226 residential units, as well as a clubhouse, recreation area, publicly-accessible park, and pool area (the “Project”), which requires a zone change, vesting tentative tract map, street vacation, general plan conformity certification, lot line adjustment, and site plan review. The impacts of

EXHIBIT A
-2-
the Project have been fully analyzed by the Long Beach River Park Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2021020492). On ________, the Planning Commission of City, at a duly noticed public hearing, recommended, in Resolution _____, that the City Council certify the EIR (SCH #2021020492). The Planning Commission also recommended that the City Council approve the Project’s vesting tentative tract map, street vacation, site plan, and other associated approvals in Resolution _____.

5. On ________, the City Council of City, at a duly noticed public hearing, adopted Resolution _____ certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report, SCH #2021020492 (the “Final EIR”) for the Project and the related Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and also adopted Resolution No. _______ (“Project Approvals”).

6. The Parties concur that all of the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, contained in Division 13 of the California Public Resources Code, commencing with Section 21000, and implemented by the Guidelines contained in Chapter 3 of Title 14, commencing with Section 15000, of the California Code of Regulations (“CEQA”) have been satisfied with respect to the Project.

7. On ______, after a duly noticed public hearing held pursuant to the Development Agreement Law and City’s Municipal Code, the City Council of City approved the introduction of Ordinance No. _____ (the “Enacting Ordinance”) that would approve and adopt this Agreement and authorize its execution on behalf of City. On ________ the City Council of City adopted the Enacting Ordinance.

8. The Parties intend that Owner will be permitted to proceed with development of the Subject Property pursuant to the Existing Land Use Regulations and Existing Development Approvals in existence on the Effective Date; provided, however, that the Parties also understand that new or different regulations and other requirements for development of the Subject Property may be imposed by laws or regulations of the Federal and/or State governments and/or various regional governmental agencies or entities with regulatory jurisdiction over aspects of the Project or Subject Property, all of which may, or may not, supersede the provisions of this Agreement.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and Owner agree as follows:

ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS.

The following terms when used in this Agreement shall, unless defined elsewhere in this Agreement, have the meanings set forth below:

1.1 The term “Agreement” shall mean this Development Agreement by and between City and Owner and any subsequent amendments.

1.2 The term “City” shall mean the City of Long Beach, a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. -3-

1.3 The term “City Council” shall mean the governing body of City.

1.4 The term “Development” shall mean the improvement of the Subject Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including but not limited to: grading; the construction of infrastructure related to the Project whether located within or outside the Subject Property; the construction of buildings and structures, and the installation of landscaping and public facilities and improvements. “Development” also includes the maintenance, repair, reconstruction, modification, or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement, landscaping, or facility after the construction and completion thereof on the Subject Property. Attached hereto as Exhibit “B” is a copy of the approved site plan for the Development of the Subject Property.

1.5 The term “Development Director” shall mean City’s Director of Development Services, or designee.

1.6 The term “Development Plan” shall mean the existing plan for Development of the Subject Property, which includes all of the plans, specifications, and conditions of approval for Owner’s entitlement for Development of the Subject Property, the planning and zoning standards, regulations, and criteria for the Development of the Subject Property, including those set forth in this Agreement.

1.7 The term “Development Requirement” shall mean any requirement of City in connection with or pursuant to any Existing Development Approvals for the construction or improvement of public facilities, the payment of fees or assessments in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the impacts of Development on the environment, or the advancement of the public interest.

1.8 The term “Effective Date” means the later of (i) the date on which the Adopting Ordinance becomes effective, typically thirty (30) days after the second reading of the Adopting Ordinance, or (ii) the date this Agreement is recorded in the records of the Los Angeles County Recorder following the date the Owner acquires fee simple title to the Subject Property (the “Closing”).

1.9 The term “Existing Development Approvals” shall mean any and all permits, licenses, consents, rights and privileges, and other actions approved or issued by City in connection with Development of the Subject Property on or before the Effective Date, including but not limited to, zone changes and other legislative approvals, site plans, parcel maps and tentative tract maps, infrastructure improvement plans, approval of a community facilities district, and grading and building-related permits, as well as all associated environmental documentation and mitigation measures pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

1.10 The term “Existing Land Use Regulations” shall mean all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of City, including but not limited to City’s development impact fees, adopted and effective on or before the Effective Date governing Development and use of the Subject Property, including but not limited to the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the -4-
architectural design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Development of the Subject Property including but not limited to, the Development Plan.

1.11 The term “Mortgagee” shall mean a mortgagee of a mortgage, a beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other security device, a lender, or each of their respective successors and assigns.

1.12 The term “Owner” shall mean The River Park Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and/or its successors or assigns to any portion of or all of the Subject Property.

1.13 The term “Project” shall mean the Development of the Subject Property as an approximately 226-unit residential development with a clubhouse, recreation area, publiclyaccessible park, and pool area pursuant to and consistent with the Development Plan and the provisions of this Agreement.

1.14 The term “Site Plan” shall mean the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.

1.15 The term “Subject Property” shall mean that certain real property more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.

1.16 The term “Subsequent Development Approvals” shall mean any and all permits, licenses, consents, rights and privileges, and other actions approved or issued by City in connection with Development of the Subject Property after the Effective Date.

1.17 The term “Subsequent Land Use Regulations” shall mean any ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of City adopted and effective after the Effective Date.

1.18 The term “Term” shall mean the period of time during which this Agreement shall be in effect and bind the Parties, as set forth in Section 3.4 of this Agreement, unless earlier terminated as provided in this Agreement.

ARTICLE 2. EXHIBITS.

The following documents are attached to, and by this reference made a part of, this Agreement:

Exhibit “A” Legal Description of the Subject Property
Exhibit “B” Approved Site Plan and Elevations for the Project Exhibit “C” List of Permitted Assignees
Exhibit “D” Assignment and Assumption Agreement
Exhibit “E” Release of Development Agreement
Exhibit “F” City of Long Beach Impact Fee Schedule
-5-
Exhibit “G” Certificate of Compliance with Development Agreement ARTICLE 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

3.1 Binding Effect of Agreement. From and following the Effective Date, Development of the Subject Property and City’s actions on applications for Subsequent Development Approvals shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

3.2 Ownership of Subject Property. City and Owner acknowledge and agree that Owner has the requisite legal or equitable interest in the Subject Property, and thus Owner is qualified to enter into and be a party to this Agreement in accordance with Government Code Section 65865(b).

3.3 Assignment Rights. Owner shall have the right to sell, transfer, or assign the Subject Property in whole or in part (provided that no such parcel transfer shall violate the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) and the rights and obligations under this Agreement to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement (collectively, “Assignment”); so long as (i) the assignee is an entity on the list attached hereto as Exhibit “C”, as the same may be amended from time to time during the term of this Agreement with the concurrence of the Director of Development Services, and (ii) any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include an assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this Agreement in form and substance reasonably similar to the form attached hereto as Exhibit “D”. Any proposed assignee that does not satisfy clause (i), above, must first be reasonably approved by City after review by City of assignee’s certified financial statements and any other documents City may request pertaining to the proposed assignee’s ability to meet its obligations hereunder.

3.3.1 Release of Transferring Owner. Notwithstanding any Assignment, a transferring Owner shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless such transferring Owner is given a release in writing by City, which release shall be provided by City upon the full satisfaction by such transferring Owner of all of the following conditions:
(a) Owner no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Subject Property;
(b) Owner is not then in default under this Agreement; and (c) The assignee provides City with security equivalent to any security previously provided by Owner to secure performance of its obligations hereunder.

3.3.2 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent Assignment after an initial Assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
-6-

3.3.3 Partial Release of Purchaser, Transferee or Assignee of Parcel. A purchaser, transferee or assignee of a lot which has been finally subdivided and for which a site plan for development of the lot has been finally approved (a “Parcel”) may submit a request, in writing, to City to release said lot from the obligations under this Agreement by executing a form of Release of Development Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit “E.” Within thirty (30) days following such request, City shall review, and if the conditions contained in Section 3.3.1 are satisfied, shall execute and deliver to the purchaser, transferee or assignee the appropriate form of Release. No such release approved pursuant to this Section 3.3.3 shall cause, or otherwise effect, a release of Owner from its duties and obligations under this Agreement.

3.3.4 Termination of Agreement With Respect to Individual Parcels upon Sale to Public and Completion of Construction. The provisions of Section 3.3 shall not apply to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any Parcel which has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in “bulk”) sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, this Agreement shall terminate with respect to such Parcel and such Parcel shall be released and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions:
(a) The Parcel has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in “bulk”) sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public or other ultimate user; and,
(b) A final inspection card has been issued for a building on the Parcel, and the fees set forth under this Agreement have been paid.

For purposes of this Section 3.3.4, a transfer shall be deemed to be “in bulk” if it involves the conveyance of more than one Parcel and the transferee will not be the ultimate user of the Parcels. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owner acknowledges that, unless and until an assignment of the Subject Property has occurred pursuant to Section 3.3 of this Agreement, Owner is responsible for (i) ensuring the completion of all Project conditions and (ii) the payment of all applicable fees to the extent any conditions are not satisfied or any fees remain unpaid following the transfer or development of a parcel.

3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated as provided in this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the earlier of (i) the date of completion of the last portion of the Development, or (ii) the date that is ten (10) years from and after the Effective Date.

3.5 Waiver of Estoppel Defenses by City. Notwithstanding any legal authorities to the contrary concerning the doctrines of waiver and estoppel as applied to public entities and the actions or inactions of public agencies or public agency officers and officials, City acknowledges and agrees that Owner and its successors and assigns to all or any interest in the Subject Property is relying upon the contents of this Agreement and City’s execution of this Agreement and the recordation hereof, and that in consideration of such material reliance, City shall now and forever be estopped from denying the validity of this Agreement and City knowingly and expressly waives any such claim or defense.
-7-

3.6 No Obligations to Proceed with Project. Nothing in this Agreement shall obligate Owner to proceed with any part of or the entirety of the Project. Owner maintains sole and absolute discretion over whether to commence and/or complete any portion of the Project or the Project in its entirety and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to impose upon Owner an obligation to commence the construction of and/or complete the Project.

ARTICLE 4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY

4.1 Vested Right to Develop. Subject to and during the term of this Agreement, Owner shall have a vested right to develop the Subject Property in accordance with the Development Plan and this Agreement.

4.2 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Subject Property, the density and intensity of use of the Subject Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to Development of the Subject Property, shall be only the Existing Land Use Regulations and those contained in the Development Plan.

4.3 Subsequent Development Approvals / Minor Modifications. To the extent applicable, City shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for Subsequent Development Approvals, and such applications shall be processed in the manner applicable to other residential property developments. City further agrees that, unless otherwise requested by Owner and provided that this Agreement has not terminated due to Owner default, City shall not amend or rescind any Subsequent Development Approvals respecting the Subject Property after such approvals have been granted by City. City agrees to allow modifications to the type, mix and layout of the Project’s 226 residential units (“Minor Modifications”) with approval from the Development Director. City further agrees to allow modifications to the Project’s Site Plan with approval from the Development Director, provided that all modifications are in substantial conformance with the approved Site Plan attached to this Agreement as Exhibit “B”. The modifications described in this Section 4.3 shall not require approval by the Planning Commission or the City Council.

4.4 Timing of Development. The Parties acknowledge that Owner cannot at this time predict when or the rate at which phases of the Subject Property will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of Owner, such as market orientation of demand, interest rates, absorption, completion and other similar factors. Because the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 455, that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over such parties’ agreement, it is the Parties’ intent to cure that deficiency by expressly acknowledging and providing that Owner shall have the right to develop the Subject Property, or to not develop the Subject Property, in such order and such rate and at such time as Owner deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment in its sole and absolute discretion. In addition, to the extent Owner or its assignee decide to proceed with a phase of the development of the Subject Property, City shall cooperate with Owner or its assignee with respect to the phasing of the development of the Subject Property.
-8-

4.5 Terms of Maps and Other Project Approvals. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 66452.6(1) and 65863.9, any subdivision or parcel map may be processed on all or any portion of the Subject Property and the term of each of the development approvals, including the Tentative Map and any future approvals, shall be extended for a period of time through the scheduled termination date of this Agreement, as set forth above.

4.6 Changes and Amendments. The Parties acknowledge that although Development of the Project may require Subsequent Development Approvals, such Development shall be in compliance with the Development Plan. The above notwithstanding, Owner may determine that changes are appropriate and desirable in the existing Development Approvals or Development Plan. In the event Owner finds that such a change is appropriate or desirable, Owner may apply in writing for an amendment to prior Development Approvals or the Development Plan to effectuate such change. The Parties acknowledge that City shall be permitted to use its sole and absolute discretion in deciding whether to approve or deny any such amendment request; provided, however, that in exercising the foregoing, City shall not apply a standard to Owner that is less favorable or different than applied by City to any other residential property developments. In addition, the Parties acknowledge and agree any modification to the Development that does not meet the thresholds set forth in 14 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 15162 shall be deemed to be a minor modification and shall not require any subsequent environmental review. Any change in the Development Approvals or Development Plan made pursuant to Owner’s application and deemed a material change by City, shall require an amendment to this Agreement. Any such amendment shall be solely for the purpose of acknowledging the change to the Development Approvals or Development Plan, as the case may be.

4.7 Reservation of Authority.

4.7.1 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall apply to the Development of the Subject Property:
(a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by City to cover the estimated actual costs to City of processing applications for Development Approvals or for monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted or issued. (b) Procedural regulations consistent with this Agreement relating to hearing bodies, petitions, applications, notices, findings, records, hearing, reports, recommendations, appeals and any other matter of procedure. (c) Changes adopted by the International Conference of Building Officials, or other similar body, as part of the then most current versions of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, or National Electrical Code, and also adopted by City as Subsequent Land Use Regulations. (d) Regulations that are not in conflict with the Development Plan and this Agreement and do not impede the Development, or add to the cost of the Development of the Project.
-9-
(e) Regulations that are in conflict with the Development Plan provided Owner has given written consent to the application of such regulations to Development of the Subject Property at Owner’s sole and absolute discretion. (f) Federal, state, county, and multi-jurisdictional laws and regulations which City is required to enforce against the Subject Property or the Development of the Subject Property.
(g) Payment of development impact fees in effect at the time that certificates of occupancy are issued for the development or any portion thereof, except all of City’s impact fees related to transportation, sewer, police, fire and public safety will be calculated based on the impact fees in effect as of the Effective Date, as more particularly described in Exhibit “F.”

4.7.2 Future Discretion of City. This Agreement shall not prevent City, in acting on Subsequent Development Approvals, from applying subsequent Land Use Regulations that do not conflict with the Development Plan, nor shall this Agreement prevent City from denying or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on the basis of Existing Land Use Regulations or any Subsequent Land Use Regulation not in conflict with the Development Plan.

4.7.3 Modification or Suspension by Federal, State, County, or MultiJurisdictional Law. In the event that federal, state, county, or multi-jurisdictional laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such federal, state, county, or multi-jurisdictional laws or regulations, and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provision impractical to enforce.

4.8 Future Voter Actions. It is the intent of the Parties that future voter actions adopting Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall not apply to the Project unless such voter actions promote, advance, or otherwise further the intent and expeditious development of the Project pursuant to and consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

4.9 Financing District Formation. City and Owner agree to cooperate in the formation of a financing district in order to finance, at Owner’s sole election, some or all of certain improvements and obligations required of Owner pursuant to the Existing Development Approvals and this Agreement.

4.10 Conditions of Approval. Owner shall comply with the Project conditions of approval.

4.11 Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. Owner agrees to declare Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (“CC&Rs”) applicable to the entire Project, which will be administered by a Homeowners Association (“HOA”) to be established by Owner.

4.12 Payment of Impact Fees. Los Angeles County and School Developer Fees and the Long Beach Water Department’s Sewer Capacity Fee are due and payable prior to the issuance -10-
of a building permit in connection with the Project. The City’s applicable developer impact fees are due and payable prior to final building inspection or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever comes first.

4.13 Affordable Housing. Owner or its assignee shall provide either (i) no less than five percent (5%) of the total housing units for very low income households as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health & Safety Code, or (ii) no less than ten percent (10%) of the total housing units for lower income households as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health & Safety Code.

ARTICLE 5. PUBLIC BENEFITS

5.1 Vacation of Baker Street Right of Way. The Owner has applied for the vacation of Baker Street west of the prolongation of the western right of way line of Golden Avenue to the eastern edge of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District-owned parcel located immediately to the west of the Subject Property (the “District Parcel”). City staff shall consider the vacation of Baker Street concurrently with its consideration of the Project Approvals.

5.1.1 Maintenance Access Agreements. The Owner or its assignee shall grant maintenance access easements to (i) the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (“District”); (ii) the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (“County”), (iii) the City, and (iv) any franchisees, utility owners, or other similar owners of property rights in or under the vacated portions of Baker Street (collectively, the “Baker Street Licensees”). The maintenance access easements shall respectively allow (i) the District, the County and the City access to the District Parcel to the west, and (ii) the Baker Street Licensees access to the vacated portions of Baker Street.

5.1.2 Public Access Agreements. The Owner or its assignee shall grant a public access easement of sufficient width for pedestrian and bicycle access from Golden Avenue to the western line of the Subject Property for the purpose of connecting public right-of-way to the east of the Subject Property to the Los Angeles River Trail.

5.1.3 Lot Line Adjustment. If necessary to satisfy Subdivision Map Act requirements, the City shall process a Lot Line Adjustment on two Los Angeles County Flood Control-owned parcels to move the southerly lot line of parcel no. 7203-001-900/northerly lot line of parcel no. 7203-001-901 to the south to align with the westerly prolongation of the southern edge of the 34th Street ROW (based upon that segment of 34th St. directly east of said parcels), for the purpose of allowing public street access directly to parcel no. 7203-001-900 and avoid land locking parcel no. 7203-001-900 through the vacation of Baker Street.

5.2 Vacation of Wardlow Road Right of Way. The Owner has applied for the vacation of the unused Wardlow Road right of way adjacent to the southwest of the Subject Property per the specifications set forth by the City’s Public Works Department and as shown on the Site Plan. City staff shall consider the vacation of the Wardlow right of way concurrently with its consideration of the Project Approvals. This real property shall be added to the Subject Property in order to meet building setback requirements, and City shall execute a quitclaim deed in favor of -11-
Developer or such other documents as may be reasonably necessary to evidence ownership of such property by Developer.

5.3 Traffic Signal. Following the City’s issuance of the first building permit to Owner or its assignee, the Owner or its assignee shall install a traffic signal and related right-of-way reconfigurations at the Project driveway at Wardlow Road to the specifications issued by the City Traffic Engineer. Such traffic signal and related reconfigurations and improvements shall be installed and operational prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Project. . In addition, Owner or its assignee shall bear full cost of plans, permits, and installation. Prior to the installation of the traffic signal, any Project driveway on Wardlow Road shall be barricaded at all times to prevent use, and all construction and employee traffic shall be routed to the Subject Property using other roads. Construction and hauling traffic routes shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to usage.

5.4 Publicly-Accessible Park on Private Land. The Owner or its assignee shall improve the northern approximately five (5) acres of the Subject Property north of Baker Street as a publicly-accessible park subject to the following:
(a) The park shall be open to the public in perpetuity at times reasonably established by the City.
(b) The park shall be developed and maintained in such a way as to appear to be a seamless extension of the City’s Baker Street Park, which abuts the site to the east. (c) Parks, Recreation, and Marine (“PRM”) to advise regarding the planning of the park at Owner or its assignee’s expense, and Owner or its assignee shall be responsible for preparing all plans and procuring all permits, if any, to the satisfaction of Directors of Development Services and PRM.
(d) The Owner or its assignee shall complete park infrastructure at or prior to the completion of the infrastructure for the other portions of the Project. The park shall be roughly 50% complete on or before the issuance of the 45th residential building permit, and the Owner or its assignee shall construct the park to completion, and such park shall have been approved by PRM, no later than the issuance of the 90th residential building permit. (e) The Owner or its assignee shall commence grading for the park concurrently with the grading of the residential development.
(f) Upon completion of the park and its improvements, the HOA established for the residential development shall provide for the on-going maintenance of the privately-owned park in perpetuity to the standards required for City parks and this requirement shall be part of the residential development’s CC&Rs.
(g) The Owner, its assignee, and/or the HOA shall not be responsible for any maintenance of the City-owned portion of Baker Street Park. The Owner, its assignee, and the HOA shall not have any liability whatsoever for the City-owned portion of Baker Street Park. -12-
(h) The Owner or its assignee shall construct a restroom at the City-owned portion of Baker Street Park to PRM specifications. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance of the restroom.

5.5 Wrigley Heights Dog Park. The Owner or its assignee shall make improvements to the Wrigley Heights Dog Park, which adjoins the development site to the southeast. The improvements shall include benches, trash cans, signs, drinking fountains, and message boards in the park, replacement of the fence adjacent to the residential development, installation of a gate between the residential development and the dog park, and installation of a new fence within the dog park creating separate areas for large dogs and small dogs, as specified by the Director of Parks, Recreation, and Marine. The Owner or its assignee shall work cooperatively with the City to prepare the necessary plans and the procurement of necessary permits, if any.

5.6 Remediation of Contamination. The Owner or its assignee shall obtain a No Further Action (NFA) Letter (or equivalent concurrence) from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) covering the Subject Property, or the final portion thereof not covered by previous letters of no further action, prior to residential occupancy of any dwelling unit or opening of the park to any user. The HOA shall be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the sludge pits/bioswales/biofiltration areas in perpetuity (or until the RWQCB issues an NFA status for those areas); this shall be recorded in the CC&Rs. Preceding references to the RWQCB shall also mean the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) if the RWQCB specifies that the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) shall oversee or approve part or all of any required remediation, or otherwise be responsible for issuance of an NFA.

5.7 Right of Way Improvements. The Owner or its assignee shall construct all of the public improvements identified in the technical advisory committee comments applicable to the Project dated June 27, 2022, each to City Public Works specifications.

ARTICLE 6. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE

6.1 Periodic Review. The City Council shall review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date, in order to ascertain the good faith compliance by Owner with the terms of this Agreement. As part of that review, Owner shall submit an annual monitoring review statement describing its actions in compliance with this Agreement, in a form acceptable to the Development Director or his/her authorized designee, at least thirty (30) days prior to each anniversary of the Effective Date. The statement shall be accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of this Agreement during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual review and administration fee shall be set by resolution of the City Council. No failure on part of City to conduct or complete the review as provided herein shall have any impact on the validity of this Agreement.

6.2 Special Review. The City Council may, in its sole and absolute discretion, order a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time at City’s sole cost. Owner shall cooperate with City in the conduct of such special reviews. -13-

6.3 Procedure. Each Party shall have a reasonable opportunity to assert matters which it believes have not been undertaken in accordance with this Agreement, to explain the basis for such assertion, and to receive from the other Party a justification of its position on such matters.

6.3.1 If on the basis of the Parties’ review of any terms of this Agreement, either Party concludes that the other Party has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement, then such Party may issue a written “Notice of Non-Compliance” specifying the grounds therefor and all facts demonstrating such non-compliance.

6.3.2 The Party receiving a Notice of Non-Compliance shall have thirty (30) days to cure or remedy the non-compliance identified in the Notice of Non-Compliance, or if such cure or remedy is not reasonably capable of being completed within such thirty (30) days period, to commence to cure or remedy the non-compliance and to diligently and in good faith prosecute such cure or remedy to completion.

6.3.3 If the Party receiving the Notice of Non-Compliance does not believe it is out of compliance and contests the Notice, it shall do so by responding in writing to said Notice of Non-Compliance within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Notice.

6.3.4 If the response to the Notice of Non-Compliance has not been received in the offices of the Party alleging the non-compliance within the prescribed time period, the Notice of Non-Compliance shall be presumed to be valid unless good cause exists for not responding within the time period.

6.3.5 If a Notice of Non-Compliance is contested, the Parties shall, for a period of not less than fifteen (15) days following receipt of the response, seek to arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter(s) occasioning the Notice of Non-Compliance. In the event that a cure or remedy is not timely effected or, if the Notice of Non-Compliance is contested and the Parties are not able to arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution of the matter(s) by the end of the fifteen (15) day period, the party alleging the non-compliance may thereupon pursue the remedies provided in Article 6 of this Agreement.

6.3.6 Neither Party hereto shall be deemed in breach if the reason for noncompliance is due to a “force majeure” as defined in, and subject to the provisions of, Section 12.9.

6.4 Certificate of Agreement Compliance. If, at the conclusion of a periodic or special review, Owner is found to be in compliance with this Agreement, City shall, upon request by Owner, issue a Certificate of Compliance with Development Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit “G” (“Certificate”) to Owner stating that after the most recent periodic or special review and based upon the information known or made known to the City Council that (1) this Agreement remains in effect and that (2) Owner is in compliance. The Certificate, whether issued after a Periodic or Special Review, shall be in recordable form, shall contain information necessary to communicate constructive record notice of the finding of compliance, and shall state that the Certificate expires upon the earlier of (i) one (1) year from the date thereof, or (ii) the date of recordation of a notice of termination of development agreement. Owner may record the Certificate with the County Recorder. Additionally, Owner may at any time request from City a -14-
Certificate stating, in addition to the foregoing, which obligations under this Agreement have been fully satisfied with respect to the Subject Property, or any lot or parcel within the Subject Property.

ARTICLE 7. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

7.1 Specific Performance Available. The Parties acknowledge and agree that specific performance is the preferred remedy available for the enforcement of this Agreement. However, nothing in the foregoing shall be construed to constitute a waiver of the right to obtain monetary damages from the other Party by reason of default of this Agreement. Subject to the cure rights set forth in Section 6.3, any material default by Owner or City of this Agreement or any of the conditions of approval of any of the Development Approvals that is not timely cured by Owner or City shall be deemed a material default by Owner or City of this Agreement.

7.2 Termination of this Agreement.

7.2.1 Termination of Agreement for Default of Owner. City may terminate this Agreement for any failure of Owner to perform any duty or obligation of Owner hereunder or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “default” or “breach”); provided, however, City may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after following the procedure set forth in Section 6.3.

7.2.2 Termination of Agreement for Default of City. Owner may terminate this Agreement for any default by City; provided, however, Owner may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after following the procedure set forth in Section 6.3 and thereafter providing written notice by Owner to City of the default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by City to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, the failure of City to cure such default within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such thirty (30) day period, the failure of City to commence to cure such default within such thirty (30) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and to cure such default.

7.2.3 Rights and Duties Following Termination. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no Party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to (i) any obligations to have been performed prior to said termination, (ii) any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement which has occurred prior to said termination, or (iii) restoration of any portion of the Subject Property owned by City to its general condition prior to the Effective Date.

7.3 Institution of Legal Action. Subject to notice of default and opportunity to cure under Section 6.3, in addition to any other rights or remedies, any Party to this Agreement may institute legal action to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to enforce any covenants or agreements herein, to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation hereof, or to obtain any other remedies consistent with this Agreement. If a legal action or proceeding is brought by any Party to this Agreement because of default, or to enforce a provision hereof, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in prosecuting such legal action or proceeding. This provision is separate and severable, and shall survive the merger of this Agreement into any judgment on this Agreement. -15-
ARTICLE 8. THIRD PARTY LITIGATION
The City shall promptly notify Owner of any claim, action, or proceeding filed and served against the City to challenge, set aside, void, annul, limit or restrict the approval and continued implementation and enforcement of this Agreement. Owner agrees to fully defend and indemnify the City for all costs of defense and/or judgment obtained in any such action or proceeding. This indemnification clause shall only apply if Owner approves of the selection of defense counsel for the City, which approval shall not unreasonably be withheld. The City and Owner agree to cooperate in the defense of such action(s).

ARTICLE 9. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION

9.1 The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit Owner, in any manner, at Owner’s sole discretion, from encumbering the Subject Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage, deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Subject Property. City acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with Owner and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. Subject to compliance with applicable laws, City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided City determines such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

9.2 Any Mortgagee of the Subject Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges:
(a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Subject Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law. (b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Subject Property, or any part thereof, which Mortgagee has submitted a request in writing to City in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from City of any default by Owner in the performance of Owner’s obligations under this Agreement. (c) If City timely receives a request from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to Owner under the terms of this Agreement, City shall make a good faith effort to provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to Owner. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the period that is the longer of (i) the remaining cure period allowed such Party under this Agreement, or (ii) thirty (30) days.
(d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Subject Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust, or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Subject Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of Owner’s obligations or other affirmative covenants of Owner hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; except that (i) to the -16-
extent that any covenant to be performed by Owner is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by City, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to City’s performance hereunder, and (ii) in the event any Mortgagee seeks to develop or use any portion of the Subject Property acquired by such Mortgagee by foreclosure, deed of trust, or deed in lieu of foreclosure, such Mortgagee shall strictly comply with all of the terms, conditions and requirements of this Agreement and the Development Plan applicable to the Subject Property or such part thereof so acquired by the Mortgagee.

ARTICLE 10. INDEMNITY
Owner agrees to and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City and City’s officers, officials, members, employees, agents, and representatives (collectively, “Indemnified Parties”), from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, and losses, including without limitation reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses, including court courts and expert witness fees (collectively, “Claims”), due to the death or personal injury of any person, or physical damage to any person’s real or personal property, caused by the construction of improvements by, or construction-related activities of, Owner or Owner’s employees, agents, representatives, servants, invitees, consultants, contractors, or subcontractors (collectively, “Owner’s Representatives”) on the Subject Property, or for any construction defects in any improvements constructed by Owner or Owner’s Representatives on the Subject Property or for any other work related to this Agreement; provided, however, that the foregoing indemnification shall not apply to the extent such Claims are proximately caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of City, or City’s officers, officials, members, employees, agents, or representatives, subject to any immunities which may apply to City with respect to such Claims. The foregoing indemnification provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 11. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW

11.1 Compliance with Laws. Owner shall cause all work performed in connection with construction of the Project to be performed in compliance with (a) all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of federal, state, county or municipal governments or agencies (including, without limitation, all applicable federal and state labor standards, including the prevailing wage provisions of Section 1770, et seq. of the California Labor Code), and (b) all directions, rules and regulations of any fire marshal, health officer, building inspector, or other officer of every governmental agency now having or hereafter acquiring jurisdiction. Owner shall indemnify, defend and hold the Indemnified Parties harmless from any and all Claims based upon or arising from the failure of any work related to the Project to comply with all such applicable legal requirements, including, without limitation, any such Claims that may be asserted against or incurred by any of the Indemnified Parties with respect to or in any way arising from the Project’s compliance with or failure to comply with applicable laws, including all federal and state labor requirements including, without limitation, the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1770, et seq.

11.2 Public Works. Owner agrees that all public work (as defined in California Labor Code Section 1720) performed pursuant to this Agreement (the “Public Work”) shall comply with the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1770, et seq. City makes no representation or -17-
statement that the Project, or any portion thereof, is or is not a “public work” as defined in California Labor Code Section 1720.

11.3 Public Work Contracts. In all bid specifications, contracts and subcontracts for any Public Work, Owner (or its general contractor, in the case of subcontracts) shall obtain the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to perform the Public Work, and shall include such rates in the bid specifications, contract or subcontract. Such bid specifications, contract or subcontract must contain the following provision: “It shall be mandatory for the contractor to pay not less than the said prevailing rate of wages to all workers employed by the contractor in the execution of this contract. The contractor expressly agrees to comply with the penalty provisions of California Labor Code Section 1775 and the payroll record keeping requirements of California Labor Code Section 1771.” This Article 11 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 12. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

12.1 Recordation of Agreement. A fully-executed original of this Agreement shall be deposited into Escrow directing that this Agreement shall be recorded immediately after recordation of the grant or other deed to Owner by which Owner acquires the Property. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65868.5, upon recordation, the burdens of this Agreement and each of its provisions shall be binding upon, and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to, all successors in interest to the Parties. Any amendments to this Agreement approved by the Parties, and any cancellation hereof, shall be similarly recorded.

12.2 Entire Agreement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter set forth herein, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement.

12.3 Severability. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the invalid provision shall be deemed to be severable from the remaining provisions contained within this Agreement. The Parties hereby state and acknowledge they would have adopted each provision contained within this Agreement notwithstanding the presence of an invalid provision.

12.4 Interpretation and Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

This Agreement shall be construed as a whole according to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the Parties, and the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party or in favor of City shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all Parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof.
-18-

12.5 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

12.6 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural.

12.7 Waiver. Failure of a Party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other Party, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party’s right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter.

12.8 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit for the Parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement.

12.9 Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by earthquakes, the acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party’s control (including the Party’s employment force), court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions), or other causes beyond the Party’s reasonable control. If any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for performance shall be extended for the duration of each such event, provided that the term of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years.

12.10 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the Party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited Party.

12.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the Parties had executed the same instrument.

12.12 Litigation. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by any Party hereto for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, or such other appropriate court in said county, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing, removal or change of venue to any other court.

Service of process on City shall be made in accordance with California law. Service of process on Owner shall be made in any manner permitted by California law and shall be effective whether served inside or outside California. In the event of any action between City and Owner seeking enforcement of any of the terms and conditions to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be awarded, in addition to such relief to which such party entitled under this Agreement, its reasonable litigation costs and expenses, including without limitation its expert witness fees and reasonable attorney’s fees.

12.13 Covenant Not To Sue. The Parties to this Agreement, and each of them, agree that this Agreement and each term hereof is legal, valid, binding, and enforceable. The Parties to this Agreement, and each of them, hereby covenant and agree that each of them will not commence, maintain, or prosecute any claim, demand, cause of action, suit, or other proceeding against any -19-
other Party to this Agreement, in law or in equity, or based on an allegation, or assert in any such action, that this Agreement or any term hereof is void, invalid, or unenforceable.

12.14 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the Parties that the Development of the Subject Property is a private development, that neither Party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each Party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between City and Owner is that of a government entity regulating the Development of private property, on the one hand, and the holder of a legal or equitable interest in such property and as future holder of fee title to such property, on the other hand.

12.15 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the Parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement.

Upon the request of either Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

12.16 Amendments in Writing/Cooperation. This Agreement may be amended only by written consent of both Parties specifically approving the amendment and in accordance with the Government Code Section 65868. The Parties shall cooperate in good faith with respect to any amendment proposed in order to clarify the intent and application of this Agreement, and shall treat any such proposal on its own merits, and not as a basis for the introduction of unrelated matters. Minor, non-material modifications may be approved by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney.

12.18 Corporate Authority. The person(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the Parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) the entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which such Party is bound.

12.19 Notices. All notices under this Agreement shall be effective upon personal delivery, via facsimile so long as the sender receives confirmation of successful transmission from the sending machine, or three (3) business days after deposit in the United States mail, registered, certified, postage fully prepaid and addressed to the respective Parties as set forth below or as to such other address as the Parties may from time to time designate in writing:
-20-
To City: City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd., 3rd Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: Development Services Director
City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd., 9th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: City Attorney
To Owner: The River Park Project Owner, LLC
888 San Clemente, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attn: John Stanek and Caren Read
Copy to: John A. Ramirez
Rutan & Tucker, LLP
18575 Jamboree Road, 9th Floor
Irvine, CA 92612
Phone: 714-662-4610
Fax: 714-546-9035

12.20 Nonliability of City Officials. No officer, official, member, employee, agent, or representatives of City shall be liable for any amounts due hereunder, and no judgment or execution thereon entered in any action hereon shall be personally enforced against any such officer, official, member, employee, agent, or representative.

12.21 No Brokers. City and Owner represent and warrant to the other that neither has employed any broker and/or finder to represent its interest in this transaction. Each Party agrees to indemnify and hold the other free and harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, cost, or expense (including court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees) in any manner connected with a claim asserted by any individual or entity for any commission or finder’s fee in connection with this Agreement arising out of agreements by the indemnifying Party to pay any commission or finder’s fee.
[end – signature page follows]
-21-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first set forth above.

City:

CITY OF LONG BEACH
By
Thomas B. Modica
City Manager, City of Long Beach
Owner:

THE RIVER PARK PROJECT OWNER, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company
By:

John Stanek, Authorized Representative

-22-
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On _________________________, before me, ,
(insert name and title of the officer)
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
-1-
EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY

-2-
-
3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-1-
EXHIBIT “B”

APPROVED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
[SEE FOLLOWING PAGES]

-1-
EXHIBIT “C”

LIST OF APPROVED TRANSFEREES/ASSIGNEES
• Lennar Homes of California, LLC.
• Lyon Living
• Landsea Homes
• DR Horton
• Pulte Group
• Taylor Morrison
• Hovnanian Enterprises
• Beazer Homes
• Tri Pointe Homes
• New Home Company
• Capital Pacific Homes
• Cal-Atlantic
• KB Home
• Meritage Homes
• Toll Brothers
• Shea Homes
• SummerHill Homes
• William Lyon Homes
• Brookfield Homes
• Olson Companies
• Woodside Homes
• Warmington Homes
• USA Properties Fund, Inc.
• St. Anton Multifamily Inc.

The foregoing includes any of their affiliates or related entities. -2-
EXHIBIT “D”

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
[SEE FOLLOWING PAGES]

-3-
Recording Requested by And
When Recorded Return to:

City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: City Clerk
APNs: _________________

ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of ____________, 20__ by and among _____________ (“Assignor”), and ______________ (“Assignee”).

RECITALS:

A. Assignor entered into that certain Development Agreement No. _________ executed by City of Long Beach (“City”) and the Assignor on ______ and recorded on __________ (the “Development Agreement”) in the Official Records of Los Angeles, California as Document No. _______.

B. The Development Agreement vested Assignor’s rights to develop 226 residential units, (the “Project”) on real property in Long Beach, California, as more specifically described in Exhibit “A” to the Development Agreement (the “Subject Property”).

C. Section 3.3 of the Development Agreement allows Assignor to sell, transfer, or assign the Subject Property in whole or in part to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of that Development Agreement, provided that any such sale, transfer or assignment includes an assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from the Development Agreement. This Agreement is intended to serve as the instrument that effects that assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from the Development Agreement, in order to comply with Section

3.3 of the Development Agreement.

D. The Assignor and Assignee have entered into a purchase and sale agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) whereby Assignor is selling all of its interest in the Subject Property to the Assignee, which is scheduled to close concurrently with the recordation of this Agreement (the “Effective Date”).

E. As part of its sale of the Subject Property, Assignor desires to assign, and Assignee desires to be assigned, all of Assignor’s interest in the Development Agreement. -4-
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and for valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. Assignment of Development Agreement.
(a) As of the Effective Date (as defined below), Assignor hereby transfers and assign to Assignee, all right, title and interest under the Development Agreement (“Assignment”).

The “Effective Date” shall be the date on which the Assignee acquires the Subject Property. (b) Assignor represents and warrants that it has complied in all material respects with its obligations under the Development Agreement arising prior to the Effective Date. (c) Notwithstanding Section 3.3.1 of the Development Agreement, Assignor shall remain liable to City for the full and proper performance of all the obligations under the Development Agreement only for the period prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. (d) Assignor has not received notice of any default under the Development Agreement from the City and, to Assignor’s knowledge, neither Assignor nor the City is in default in any material respect thereunder. Assignor represents and warrants that it has not assigned any interest in the Development Agreement and that it will defend its interest under the Development Agreement. Except as stated above, and except for such representations and warranties as may expressly survive the execution of this Agreement pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Assignor’s right, title and interest in, to and under the Development Agreement and the Subject Property covered thereby are assigned hereunder without representation or warranty of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether statutory, express or implied.

2. Assumption of Development Agreement.
(a) The undersigned Assignee (i) hereby accepts said Assignment as of the Effective Date; (ii) hereby assumes all of Assignor’s burdens and obligations under the Development Agreement from and after the Effective Date; (iii) hereby agrees to and for the benefit of City to keep, perform, and be bound by all of the terms, covenants and conditions contained in said Development Agreement on the part of the Owner therein to be kept and performed from and after the Effective Date, to all intents and purposes as though the undersigned Assignee was the original Owner thereunder; and (iv) hereby agrees to be subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement applicable to the Subject Property, in each case to the extent that such burdens, obligations or duties arise from and after the Effective Date. (b) Pursuant to Section 3.3.1(c) of the Development Agreement, the Assignee shall provide the City with security equivalent to any security previously provided by the Assignor to secure performance of Assignee’s obligations as the Owner under the Development Agreement. (c) As between the Assignee and the Assignor, the delivery of this Agreement shall not affect, enlarge, diminish or otherwise impair any of the terms or provisions of the Purchase Agreement or the rights or obligations of the parties thereunder. In the event of a conflict between the terms and provisions of this Agreement and the terms and provisions of the Purchase Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall govern and control. In the event of a conflict between (i) the Development Agreement and this Agreement, and/or (ii) the -5-
Development Agreement and the Purchase Agreement, the terms and provisions of the Development Agreement shall, as between the City, on the one hand, and the Assignor and Assignee, on the other hand, govern and control.
(d) The undersigned Assignee further covenants and agrees that it has examined the Subject Property and that no representation or warranties have been made by Assignor, the City or by any person or agent acting for the Assignor or the City in connection with the Subject Property. Assignee accepts the Subject Property “AS IS”. (e) On or before the Effective Date, Assignee further agrees to provide City evidence of insurance in the manner required by Article 9 of the Development Agreement. (f) Any default under this Agreement by Assignee shall be a concurrent default under the Development Agreement.

3. Development Agreement. Assignee has reviewed all of the provisions of the Development Agreement, has sought legal counsel where necessary, and fully understands all of the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement that are allocated to the Subject Property and assumed by Assignee by this Agreement.

4. No Amendment to Development Agreement. Assignor and Assignee acknowledge and agree that the Development Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect notwithstanding the Assignment thereof with respect to the Subject Property, and shall continue to govern the rights and obligations of Assignee as the assignee of the “Owner” of the Subject Property, as provided by this Agreement and the Development Agreement.

5. Recording. This Agreement may be recorded.

6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute the one original.
[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank; signature page follows.]

-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date first above written.

ASSIGNOR: ____________________________,
a ____________________________
By:

Name:

Its:

ASSIGNEE: ,
a
By:

Name:

Its:

-7-
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
-1-
EXHIBIT “E”

RELEASE
[SEE FOLLOWING PAGES]

-2-
Recording Requested by And
When Recorded Return to:

City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: City Clerk
APN: ______________________
______________________________________________________________________________

RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (“Release”) is dated as of _____________ ___, 20____, and is made by the City of Long Beach, a California municipal corporation (“City”), with respect to that certain Development Agreement No. _______, executed by City and ____________, a ____________ (“Owner”) on _________, which was recorded in the Official Records of Los Angeles County, California, on _____________, as Document No. __________ (the “Development Agreement”).

Initially capitalized words or terms used but not defined in this Release shall have the meanings assigned to such words or terms in the Development Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 3.3.3 of the Development Agreement, the City finds and declares that the parcel more specifically described in Exhibit “A” hereto (“Parcel”) has been finally subdivided and a site plan for development of the Parcel has been finally approved, as those terms are used in Section 3.3.3 of the Development Agreement. The City hereby finds and declares that the conditions in Section 3.3.1 of the Development Agreement have been satisfied, and the Parcel has been transferred to _____ (“Purchaser”) in compliance with the terms of that Development Agreement.

Accordingly, the City hereby fully and completely releases the Purchaser from all of the Owners’ obligations under the Development Agreement with respect to the Parcel. This Release specifically inures to the benefit of the Purchaser’s successors and assigns.

-3-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City has caused this Partial Release of Development Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

CITY: CITY OF LONG BEACH, a California
municipal corporation
By: ________________________________
______, City Manager
ATTEST:
_______________________________
____________________, City Clerk

-4-
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
-5-
EXHIBIT “F”

CITY OF LONG BEACH IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
[SEE FOLLOWING PAGES]

-6-

-7-

-8-
EXHIBIT “G”

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
[SEE FOLLOWING PAGES]
-9-
Recording Requested by And
When Recorded Return to:

City of Long Beach
411 W Ocean Blvd.

Long Beach, CA 90802
Attn: City Clerk

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Certificate of Compliance with Development Agreement (“Certificate”) is delivered with reference to that certain Development Agreement No._______, executed by and between __________, a _____ (“Owner”) and the City of Long Beach, a California municipal corporation (“City”) on _____, and recorded with the County of Los Angeles on ___________, as Document No. _______. Section references in this Certificate relate to the Development Agreement unless stated otherwise.

This Certificate is delivered in accordance with Section 6.4 of the Development Agreement, and has been executed by an authorized officer of the City. This Certificate is delivered with respect to the time period from _____ to ____ (“Review Period”), and the date on which this certificate was executed by the City shall be referred to as the Compliance Date.

In accordance with Section 6.4 of the Development Agreement, as of the Compliance Date, after the City’s most recent [Periodic or Special] Review, which occurred during the Review Period, based upon the information known or made known to the City Council, the Development Agreement remains in effect, and the Owner is in full compliance with the development agreement.

To the best knowledge of the undersigned and the City Council, no event or circumstance has occurred that constitutes a material adverse change since the date the most recent Certificate was executed and delivered.

This Certificate shall expire the earlier of (i) one (1) year after the Compliance Date, or (ii) the date of recordation of a Notice of Termination of Development Agreement, as that term is defined in the Development Agreement.
-10-
The undersigned and the City Council affirm that the obligations under the Development Agreement have been fully satisfied by the Owner as of the Compliance Date:

Dated: ___________, 20___.

City of Long Beach
_____________________
By:

AGENDA ITEM No. 1 Development Services
Planning Bureau
411 West Ocean Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Long Beach, CA 90802 562.570.6194
September 1, 2022

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
City of Long Beach
California
RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution certifying the River Park Residential Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR-07-20, SCH#2021020492); Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a Zone Change (ZCHG20-002) from CS, CS (H), and R-1-N to RP-15 and RP-15 (H); Recommend that the City Council approve Site Plan Review (SPR20-007) for construction of a new residential Planned Unit Development of 226 dwelling units consisting of 74 two-story detached single-family homes on small condominium lots, 99 two-story row townhouses, and 53 three-story carriage townhouses, located on 15.53 acres of a 20.4-acre development site, with a park to be developed on the remaining 4.81 acres of the property;
Recommend that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 82712 (VTTM20-002) to create one master ground lot and 226 airspace lots, on a 20.4- acre development site;
Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving a Development Agreement (DA20-001) between the City and Integral Communities, LLC; and, Recommend that the City Council adopt a General Plan Conformity Certification (GPC21-003) for the vacation of 1) Baker Street between Golden Avenue and the western edge of the project site, and 2) portions of unused right-of-way on Wardlow Road adjacent to the project site. (District 7)
APPLICANT: Peter Vanek for Integral Communities
888 San Clemente Drive, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92660-6367
(Application No. 2003-24)
Attachment A

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 2 of 14 ends

DISCUSSION
The applicant proposes building a new residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) consisting of 226 dwelling units and a park, located on a 20.4-acre site. The project site will be divided into a 15.53-acre residential component, which will contain 74 two-story detached single-family homes, 99 two-story row townhouses, and 53 three-story carriage townhouses, with each unit to have an individual condominium airspace for ownership. A park is to be developed on the remaining 4.81 acres of the property. Primary access to the PUD would be provided from a private gated drive on Wardlow Road. An emergency access point is proposed at the northeast corner of the complex, at the intersection of Baker Street and Golden Avenue. The proposed circulation system within the PUD consists of a private drive loop to the residential units and amenity features, with on-street guest parking inside the PUD. Vacation of the unimproved Baker Street right-of-way west of Golden Avenue is proposed as part of the project since this street bisects the PUD and its proposed park. The project will include provision of five percent of the total number of dwelling units as affordable housing units at the very-low Area Median Income (AMI) level.

Project Site
The project site is located on the former Oil Operators, Inc. property at 712 Baker Street, bounded by Wardlow Road on the south, Golden Avenue on the east, the San Diego Freeway (I-405) on the north, and the Los Angeles County flood control channel parcels and the Los Angeles River on the west (Attachment A – Location Map). Baker Street bisects the project site from east to west, and this segment of Baker Street is proposed to be vacated and incorporated into the PUD. Baker Street currently functions as a maintenance access road to the Los Angeles County-owned parcels to the west. The pedestrian, cycling, and equestrian trails to the west of the project site are located on the Los Angeles County-owned parcels and would be unaffected by the project. The project site itself contains no trails or through access to the Los Angeles River trail system. The City of Long Beach (City) Baker Street Park is adjacent to the east of the park proposed by the developer, and the design of the proposed park would be integrated with the existing City park to function as a single larger park. The City’s Wrigley Heights Dog Park is adjacent to the southeast of the proposed residential portion of the PUD. Access to the project site is taken from a driveway directly on Wardlow Road, and from Baker Street west of Golden Avenue (Attachment B – Site Aerial Photo). The current land use, general plan PlaceType, and zoning of the site and its surroundings are described in the table below.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 3 of 14 ends

Table 1 – Surrounding Land Uses, Zoning, and General Plan Location Existing Land
Use
General Plan
PlaceType Zoning Overlay
Project site: north
and west portion Vacant
FCN / 2-story
(Founding and
Contemporary
Neighborhood)
CS
(Commercial Storage) None
Project site: east
portion Vacant FCN / 2-story CS H (Horse)
Project site:
southwest portion Vacant FCN / 2-story
R-1-N
(Single-family
Residential, standard
lot)
None
East of project site
Residential
small-lot
development
FCN / 2-story
R-1-S
(Single-family
Residential, small lot)
None
North of project site Freeway OS
(Open Space)
PR
(Public right-of-way) None
West of project site
Flood control
channel, Los
Angeles River,
trails and
recreation
OS Not zoned None
South of project site
(south of Wardlow
Road)
Multifamily
residential
MFR-L
Multiple Family
Residential Low
Density
None
Baker Street Park City Park OS CS, R-1-N None
Wrigley Heights Dog
Park City Park OS CS H

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 4 of 14 ends

The zoning of the site and surroundings is illustrated in the figure below.

Figure 1. Project site (blue outline) and zoning.

Project
Site
CS Zone
R-1-N Zone
CS Zone with
Horse Overlay

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 5 of 14 ends

Project Proposal and Design
The developer proposes to build a 226-unit residential PUD on the 15.53-acre portion of the project site between Wardlow Road and Baker Street, and a park on the 4.81-acre portion of the site north of Baker Street. The residential portion of the PUD also will contain an amenity facility and building for residents, consisting of a multi-purpose community room, restrooms, and swimming pool. The PUD unit mix and characteristics are shown in the following table:

Table 2 – Unit Mix
Unit Type Single-Family
Detached Row Townhouses Carriage Townhouses
Unit Count 74 99 53
Bedroom Count 3–5 3 2–3
Unit Size (sq. ft.) 1,924–2,244 1,464–1,800 1,414–1,653 Building Height 2 stories 2 stories 3 stories
Unit Parking 2 garage stalls 2 garage stalls 2 garage stalls Affordable Unit Count 0 0 12
4-unit buildings n/a 6 1
5-unit buildings n/a 3 3
6-unit buildings n/a 10 0
8-unit buildings n/a 0 3
10-unit buildings n/a 0 1
The 74 detached single-family homes have three different proposed unit plans; with each unit plan having four variations. The 99 row townhomes will comprise a total of 19 buildings, split between 4-, 5-, and 6-unit buildings, with three different unit plans for the row townhome units, and each unit in each building differentiated using architectural details and colors. The 53 carriage townhomes are found in 8 buildings on the project site, split between 4-, 5, 8-, and 10-unit buildings, with two different unit plans for the carriage townhome units, and again with each unit within each building differentiated using architectural details and colors (Attachment C – Plans). A total of five percent of the dwelling units (12 units) will be provided as affordable housing units at the very-low AMI level. All 12 of these units will be provided as carriage townhouses, although they are evenly distributed throughout the carriage townhouse buildings in the PUD.

The single-family homes will be located on the east, north, and west perimeter of the residential portion of the PUD site, fronting on Golden Avenue, the vacated Baker Street right-of-way, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property, with a doublerow of single-family homes through the center of the site connecting the rows of singlefamily homes on the east and west edges. The carriage townhouses are located toward the front of the PUD, with a 30-foot setback from Wardlow Road, with the project drive on the east and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property on the west, and the

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 6 of 14 ends

row townhouses behind. The row townhouses are located in two groups in the center of the PUD: a front group between the carriage townhomes and the double-row of singlefamily homes, and a rear group surrounded by the single-family homes on all sides.

Each dwelling unit in the PUD will be connected to a pedestrian path providing continuous pedestrian circulation throughout the PUD; where these pedestrian paths must cross the private streets or drive aisles, they will be paved with decorative pavers to ensure the pedestrian path is clearly marked. Continuous pedestrian connection will be provided for each unit directly to the public right-of-way. Each unit also is provided with a two-car garage accessed from the private street network within the PUD. Required guest parking is provided on the private streets as well. Landscaping will be provided at all site perimeter areas and stormwater containment and filtration swales, and in each residential front yard for the single-family dwellings, including a broad-canopy leafy tree in each front yard to function as a street tree.

Each dwelling unit will be located on a condominium airspace to allow individual ownership, with one master ground lot containing all common areas and amenities owned by the Homeowners’ Association (HOA). All streets, sidewalks, and driveways within the development, as well as all common facilities and amenities, will be privately owned and maintained. This includes the recreation center, park, perimeter walls, fences, and gates, as well as utility connections and stormwater systems. The HOA will be responsible for managing the ongoing maintenance of all common improvements and facilities, enforcing the maintenance and appearance standards for each dwelling, as well as enforcing parking restrictions (including use of the guest parking spaces), and managing the placement of trash carts for refuse collection. Additionally, the HOA will be responsible for the maintenance of the public sidewalk, parkways, and street trees on public streets adjacent to the PUD. Through the inclusion of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, adequate provision will be made for the long-term maintenance and upkeep of the development by the HOA.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 7 of 14 ends

history interpretive signs and path, a butterfly garden, a wildflower meadow, and a picnic area. California native drought-tolerant landscaping will be provided on the park perimeter. Additional park improvements and programming have been specified by the Director of the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Marine; these improvements will include two pickleball courts and a daisy court to reduce turf usage due to the ongoing drought. The eastern edge of this park will abut the western edge of the City’s Baker Street Park, and the new park will be developed to seamlessly integrate with the City’s park to give the appearance of one single larger park. The new park will be open to the public in the same manner as a City park, and the HOA will be required to maintain the new park in perpetuity. Additionally, the developer will be required to make improvements to Baker Street and Wrigley Heights Dog Parks, both of which are adjacent to the PUD.

These improvements will include a new self-cleaning restroom and a shade structure over the existing playground at the Baker Street Park, and amenity improvements to the Wrigley Heights Dog Park including benches, trash cans, drinking fountains, message boards, and fence replacement.

Development Standards Compliance
The developer proposes this project as a PUD under Division III of Chapter 21.31 of the Zoning Regulations (PUD Ordinance), which specifies development standards for any new PUD. The PUD Ordinance was established to allow development of PUDs with greater flexibility while achieving a greater level of community amenities than would otherwise be built by individual development of dwelling units or projects. The PUD development standards include minimum site area, internal site planning integration requirements, setbacks, building height, private open space, minimum lot sizes and width, and floor area ratio standards.

The proposed development complies with all of the applicable development standards in the PUD Ordinance, although several standards, such as minimum lot size, lot width, lot coverage, and floor area ratio, are not applicable because the development is proposed as one master ground lot with condominium airspaces, rather than individual fee simple ownership of the lots. Notably, the PUD Ordinance requires 15 percent of the total site (approximately three acres) to be developed as common open space amenity area, and compliance with this requirement is achieved through construction of the proposed 4.81- acre park.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 8 of 14 ends

development standards waivers if a specified level of affordable housing is provided in the project. In this case, the developer meets the requirement for one development standards waiver by providing five percent of the dwellings as very-low AMI affordable housing units. Staff concurs with this development standards waiver claim. This portion of the project related to the affordable units and standards waiver is a ministerial act. The City’s inclusionary housing ordinance does not apply to this project since it is not located within either the Downtown or Midtown submarkets.

Requested Entitlements and Recommended Actions
This project requires approval of the following entitlements. Each of these entitlements and staff recommendation is discussed below.

Existing zoning on the site is a combination of CS (Commercial Storage), CS (H) (Commercial Storage with Horse Overlay), and R-1-N (Single-family Residential, standard lot). The CS zone is a highly restrictive zone that allows a very limited range of land uses consisting mainly of commercial storage facilities (miniwarehouse or self-storage uses). Development of the proposed project would not be possible under the CS zone, and development of a project consistent with the CS zone would provide no community benefits, achieve no local planning objectives, and would generally create a negative, low-activity and non-beneficial land use. Further, the CS zoning at this site is not consistent with the LUE of the General Plan, which designates the subject site as FCN, a moderate-density residential PlaceType, and development of a commercial storage facility would not be permitted under the General Plan. The R-1-N zone, while consistent with the General Plan, would also preclude development of the proposed project, and instead would allow a very limited number of dwellings to be developed in the small area of the site that is under the R-1-N zone (approximately 60,000–65,000 square feet or 1.5-acre, allowing possibly 6–10 dwellings). This zoning also would fail to achieve local planning objectives, especially related to housing production, and would provide no community benefits either. The existing H Overlay zone on a portion of the CS zone on the subject site is not relevant to the project, since there are no existing equestrian uses or improvements on the site, and none are proposed. The H Overlay is not proposed to be removed from the project site’s zoning as part of the requested Zone Change. Nearby equestrian trails and facilities and other nearby areas under the H Overlay zone would remain unaffected by the project development and the rezoning action.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 9 of 14 ends

Staff supports the Zone Change request, as it is consistent with the General Plan, would achieve local planning objectives by allowing significant housing production, and would provide the significant community benefit of the development of a 4.81- acre park, improvements to City parks, and significant public realm improvements to surrounding streets and sidewalks, among other benefits. Justification for the Zone Change is discussed in detail in the Zone Change findings (Attachment E – Findings). The Zone Change must be adopted by ordinance, which requires City Council approval.

2. Site Plan Review and Planned Unit Development: For a PUD project, a PUD approval is required in tandem with the Site Plan Review approval for the project design. Site Plan Review considers general design objectives and guidelines and consistency with the General Plan and zoning, while the PUD approval considers standards specific to a PUD. Staff supports the Site Plan Review and PUD requests, as all of these applicable objectives and requirements are met by the proposed project design. These are discussed in detail in the Site Plan Review and Planned Unit Development findings. Significant off-site improvements are required in conjunction with this approval, including street, sidewalk, and parkway improvements, improvements to Baker Street and Wrigley Heights Dog Parks, and installation of a fully signalized intersection at the project driveway. These and other required improvements are detailed in the Conditions of Approval (Attachment F – Conditions of Approval).

3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map (VTTM): The developer requests approval of VTTM No. 82712 to subdivide the project site into one master ground lot and individual condominium airspaces for each dwelling unit (Attachment G – Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 82712). This will allow each unit to be sold for individual ownership, while the HOA will own the master ground lot. Staff supports the VTTM request, as it is consistent with the General Plan and zoning development standards for the PUD, as discussed in detail in the VTTM findings.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 10 of 14 ends

supports the Development Agreement request, as it provides additional community benefits through on- and off-site improvements related to the project, including development of the on-site park and improvements to the off-site City parks adjacent to the PUD. The Development Agreement must be adopted by ordinance, which requires City Council approval.

When vacated, the full width of the Baker Street right-of-way will become part of the PUD site, and a maintenance access easement will be provided to Los Angeles County and the City of Long Beach for access to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District parcel to the west.

General Plan Conformity Findings
Before an application for the vacation of public right-of-way can go before the City Council, a finding of conformity with the maps and policies of the General Plan must be made by the Planning Commission. The General Plan consists of 13 elements; each element carries the same authority concerning land use issues. Staff reviewed this project’s conformance with all elements of the General Plan, and the proposed vacation was found to be in conformance with all applicable elements. A review of the relevant elements of the General Plan pertaining to the vacation of Baker Street and unused portions of rightof-way on Wardlow Road adjacent to the project site, and General Plan consistency findings for the same, are presented below.

Land Use Element Consistency
The 2019 LUE divides the City into 14 land use districts, which provide general guidance as to the appropriate type and density of land uses. Baker Street is located within the FCN PlaceType, while the unused Wardlow Road right-of-way adjacent to the project site is located within the OS (Open Space) PlaceType. The development site itself is located within the FCN PlaceType as well. Baker Street would be vacated to become a pedestrian path and maintenance access road to the Los Angeles County Flood Control District parcel to the west of the project site; this would be consistent with the FCN PlaceType, which permits low-to-moderate-density residential development and associated accessory uses of land. The unused public right-of-way on Wardlow Road consists of several stair-step-shaped slivers of land varying in width from approximately 25 feet to approximately 59 feet, with a length equal to the project’s frontage on Wardlow Road of approximately 675 feet. This area would become part of the required 30-foot setback

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 11 of 14 ends

between Wardlow Road and the PUD’s buildings, and would be improved from its vacant dirt state to landscaped open space. The City will retain a slope easement over the portion of this area that comprises the foot of the embankment of the Wardlow Road bridge over the Los Angeles River.

According to the LUE, a subdivision approval (which category would include the proposed vacations) is considered consistent with the LUE when the density of the proposed subdivision meets the PlaceType’s residential density. In this case, the vacation of the Baker Street and unused right-of-way portions of Wardlow Road to become part of the development site would be consistent, as the intensity of the proposed development is consistent with the LUE. Further, the LUE states that a development project is considered consistent when the proposed development carries out the policies of the LUE and fulfills the intent of the PlaceType density and intensity levels. The overall development project is consistent with the PlaceType, and therefore approval of the street vacations is consistent with the LUE of the General Plan.

Mobility Element Consistency
The City's Mobility Element is aimed at transforming Long Beach into a city of flexible, convenient, affordable, and energy-efficient transportation options for residents and visitors alike. The public street to be vacated, consisting of Baker Street between Golden Avenue and the Los Angeles County parcel to the west, and portions of unused right-ofway on Wardlow Road, have been found by the Public Works Department as no longer necessary for present or prospective public use or convenience. Existing rights-of-way (Wardlow Road, Golden Avenue, and Baker Street east of Golden) provide adequate vehicular and pedestrian access to the development site. The proposed vacations therefore would not prove detrimental to the movement of people and goods to the subject site, and Baker Street provides no through traffic or connectivity to any other property except the Los Angeles County Flood Control District property to the west, for which a maintenance access easement will be reserved for the County and the City. The proposed vacations are consistent with the Mobility Element.

From 1926 to 1988, the project site was used for the treatment of oil field production brines, water, and wastewater, and other fluid by-products generated by oil production activities in the area. Initially, the water treatment process occurred in settling basins

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 12 of 14 ends

designed and constructed to remove oil and sediment from the production water. The treated water was discharged to the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County (LACSD) sewer system under a permit issued by LACSD. Crude oil was recovered in the treatment process for recycling as a by-product. A water treatment facility was constructed on site in 1959, consisting of five circular concrete-walled skimming basins and associated pumps, above ground storage tanks (ASTs), pipelines, and related small buildings and facilities. The treatment plant was located north of the two rectangular-shaped, clay-lined settling basins in the southern portion of the site, south of Baker Street. A settling pond was located north of Baker Street. The facility ceased operations in 1988.

In October 2000, the City of Long Beach Fire Department (LBFD) directed that liquid hydrocarbon products, wastewater and sludge be removed from the site and that hydrocarbon impacted soils and groundwater be remediated. Buildings, ASTs, and related aboveground structures were cleaned, demolished, and disposed of offsite in 2000 and 2001. In 2002, the LBFD directed that liquid hydrocarbon products, wastewater, and sludge be removed from the site under a Site Remediation Permit issued by the City, coordinated with the LBFD, and the City of Long Beach Department of Health and Human Services (LBDHHS). Soil and groundwater impacted by hydrocarbons were required to be remediated under the oversight of the LBDHHS and Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). A Consent Decree directed that remediation of Basin 1 take place in accordance with the standards specified by LBDHHS in 2002. These standards were described in a series of workplans prepared by the site owner and approved by the regulatory agencies. These workplans identified requirements for boring, soil sampling, monitoring wells, and soil remediation through a bioremediation filtration process. The process of bioremediation involves incorporating microorganisms into hydrocarbon contaminated soil to convert the hydrocarbon compounds into harmless products. Regular tilling of the soil to incorporate and activate microorganisms is ongoing.

Other ongoing activities include groundwater monitoring for hydrocarbon plume and arsenic presence in the groundwater.

Additional efforts were made to reduce vapor phase benzene concentrations adjacent to Golden Avenue from 2012 to 2014, with the installation of a vapor extraction system (VES). A soil VES uses vacuum pressure to remove volatile and some semi-volatile contaminants (VOCs and SVOCs) from the soil by installing vapor extraction wells underground to capture VOCs. Once the VOCs and SVOCs are removed from the soil, they are delivered to an aboveground treatment system where the treated emissions are released. In April 2015, additional VES units were employed in the northeastern part of the Project site. LARWQCB further approved the implementation of Tesoro Expanded Remedial Action Plan for additional VES wells on February 8, 2017, and further amended the plan on December 27, 2018. The amended Tesoro Expanded Remedial Action Plan involves the installation of 12 horizontal VES wells and four angled VES wells to extend beneath Golden Avenue from the east side of the project site and five vertical VES wells

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 13 of 14 ends

beneath the Project site. Continuous environmental testing and investigations were conducted from the early 1980s to 2019, alongside bioremediation efforts on site from the 1980s under permits issued by the City. The test data from these investigations were used to develop the Remedial Action Plan (RAP).

Site conditions, the RAP, and cleanup history and requirements are described in greater detail in the EIR and appendices.

PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
A notice of public hearing was mailed on August 4, 2022, in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 21.21 of the Long Beach Municipal Code. A notice of public hearing also was published in the Long Beach Press-Telegram on August 4, 2022, also in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 21.21. No public comments in response to these notices were received at the time the report was prepared.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR-07-20) was prepared for the River Park Residential Development Project (SCH#202120492) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21100 and 21100.1, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15161 (Attachment I – Project EIR and Attachments). A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for this EIR was distributed to public agencies and made available for public review and comment for a CEQA-required 30-day NOP review period that started on February 25, 2021 and ended on March 29, 2021. The City received 26 written comments during this NOP review period. A Scoping Meeting was held during this review period, on March 24, 2021, to further solicit public comment on the scope and content of the EIR.

CHAIR AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
September 1, 2022

Page 14 of 14 ends

did not substantially alter the Draft EIR environmental analysis or change the conclusions of the Draft EIR regarding potential project environmental impacts. The Final EIR determined that the project, in compliance with all recommended mitigation measures, would not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts.

The project will be subject to the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the EIR, which establishes mitigation measures that apply to the project. These mitigation measures pertain to air quality, biology, geology and seismicity, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, traffic and circulation, and tribal cultural resources.

The preparation and public availability of this EIR has been carried out in compliance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. Staff therefore recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify EIR-07-20.

Respectfully submitted,

SCOTT KINSEY, AICP

PROJECT PLANNER

ALEXIS OROPEZA

CURRENT PLANNING OFFICER

CHRISTOPHER KOONTZ, AICP

ACTING DIRECTOR OF

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CK:AO:SK
Attachments: Attachment A – Location Map
Attachment B – Site Aerial Photo
Attachment C – Plans
Attachment D – Zone Change Map
Attachment E – Findings
Attachment F – Conditions of Approval
Attachment G – Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 82712
Attachment H – Development Agreement Text
Attachment I – Project EIR and Attachments

LOS ANGELES RIVER

W WARDLOW RD

PACIFIC PL

MAINE AVE

LONG BEACH FWY

GOLDEN AVE
34TH ST

SAN DIEGO FWY

BAKER ST

MAGNOLIA AVE
W 35TH ST
W 37TH ST
38TH ST
W 36TH ST

GALE AVE

WISE AVE

FASHION AVE

TAPER ST
39TH ST

EASY AVE

WARDLOW RD N SERVICE RD

PRIVATE

D R IVEWAY

CAMERON ST

COUNTRYSIDE LN

MADDOX S T
35TH CT
36TH CT

AMBECO RD

GALE AVE
34TH ST

GALE AVE

FASHION AVE

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY

BAKER ST

COUNTRYSIDE LN
Subject Property:
712 Baker St
Application No. 2003-24
Council District 7
Zoning Code: CS
5 4 7
3 1
9 8
6 ´ 2
160 80 0 160 320
Feet
Attachment B
Planning & Zoning
City of Long Beach, CA
July 12, 2022
0 0.0375 0.075 0.15 mi
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 km
1:3,382
change. W hile reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the data, the information provided herein may be inaccurate or out of date. City authorized documents are owned solely by the City; The City retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce these documents, or allow others to do so for City purposes. Documents may be protected under U.S. and Foreign Copyright Laws.

DISCLAIMER: The s
Attachment C

NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT SITE PLAN

LONG BEACH, CA

RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL
06/29/2022
C-1 0 120 feet
SCALE: 1" = 60'
60 180 240

GOLDEN AVE

BAKER ST

W WARLOW RD

LOS ANGELES RIVER

OPEN SPACE
PARK

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
Landscape Architecture
3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626
O: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 bgb-inc.com
Planning Urban Design

EXISTING
BAKER ST. PARK
Attachment C

RESIDENTIAL CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN

LONG BEACH, CA

RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL
06/29/2022
L-1 0 80 feet
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 120 160
SHEET L-2
KEY MAP N.T.S
ARBUTUS X ‘MARINA’

MARINA ARBUTUS

GEIJERA PARVIFOLIA

AUSTRALIAN WILLOW
PYRUS ‘CHANTICLEER

CHANTICLEER PEAR

RHAPHIOLEPIS
‘MAJESTIC BEAUTY’

QUERCUS SPECIES

OAK TREE

BAUHINIA VARIEGATA

PURPLE ORCHID TREE

LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA

CRAPE MYRTLE

METROSIDEROS EXCELSA

NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE

PLATANUS RACEMOSA

CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE
MAGNOLIA ‘RUSSET’

SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA

TIPUANA TIPU

TIPU TREE

TRISTANIA

CONFERTA

BRISBANE BOX
OPEN SPACE PARCEL, SEE SHEET L-2

GOLDEN AVE

BAKER ST

LOS ANGELES RIVER
W. WARDLOW RD

GATE RECREATIONAL AREA
TREES

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE

FLOWERING ACCENT TREES
TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE M 24” BOX
BAUHINIA VARIEGATA PURPLE ORCHID TREE L 24” BOX

MEDIUM EVERGREEN TREES
ARBUTUS X ‘MARINA’ MARINA ARBUTUS L 24” BOX
GEIJERA PARVIFOLIA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW L 24” BOX
TRISTANIA CONFERTA BRISBANE BOX M 24” BOX
METROSIDEROS EXCELSA NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE M 24” BOX

INTERIOR STREET TREES
PYRUS CALLERYANA “CHANTICLEER” CHANTICLEER PEAR M 24” BOX LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ CRAPE MYRTLE M 24” BOX
RHAPHIOLEPIS ‘MAJESTIC BEAUTY’ N.C.N M 24” BOX

PERIMETER STREETSCAPE
QUERCUS SPECIES OAK TREE L 24” BOX
PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE L 24” BOX
BAUHINIA VARIEGATA PURPLE ORCHID TREE L 24” BOX
TRISTANIA CONFERTA BRISBANE BOX M 24” BOX

FLOWERING CANOPY TREES
MAGNOLIA G. ‘RUSSET’ MAGNOLIA M 24” BOX

PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE - RESIDENTIAL
SHRUBS

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE SPACING
AEONIUM URBICUM DINNER PLATE AEONIUM L 1 GAL 24” O.C
AGAVE ATTENUATA AGAVE L 5 GAL 26” O.C
ALOE STRIATA CORAL ALOE L 1 GAL 24” O.C
ANIGOZANTHOS FLAVIDUS ‘BIG RED’ RED KANGAROO PAW M 5 GAL 36” O.C ARBUTUS UNEDO ‘ELFIN KING’ DWARF STRAWBERRY TREE L 15 GAL 60” O.C CALLISTEMON ‘LITTLE JOHN’ DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH M 5 GAL 36” O.C CARISSA MACROCARPA ‘GREEN CARPET’ GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUM L 1 GAL 24” O.C CRASSULA ARGENTEA JADE PLANT L 5 GAL 36” O.C
CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS ‘TINY TOWER’ TM TINY TOWER ITALIAN CYPRESS L 15 GAL 36” O.C DIANELLA TASMANICA ‘VARIEGATA’ FLAX LILY M 1 GAL 24” O.C DIETES BICOLOR FORTNIGHT LILY L 5 GAL 36” O.C
ELAEAGNUS PUNGENS ‘FRUITLANDII’ SILVERBERRY L 5 GAL 60” O.C LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM ‘TEXANUM’ WAX LEAF PRIVET M 5 GAL 36” O.C LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA ‘BREEZE’ DWARF MAT RUSH L 1 GAL 24” O.C NANDINA DOMESTICA ‘COMPACTA’ DWARF HEAVENLY BAMBOO L 5 GAL 36” O.C PHOENIX ROEBELENII PIGMY DATE PALM M 15 GAL 60” O.C
PODOCARPUS MACROPHYLLUS ‘ICEE BLUE’ YEW PINE M 15 GAL 36” O.C PRUNUS CAROLINIANA ‘COMPACTA’ CAROLINA CHERRY M 5 GAL 48” O.C RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA ‘BALLERINA’ BALLERINA INDIAN HAWTHORN L 5 GAL 36” O.C RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA ‘CLARA’ INDIAN HAWTHORN L 5 GAL 48” O.C RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA ‘MINOR’ YEDDA HAWTHORN L 5 GAL 36” O.C STRELITZIA REGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE M 5 GAL 48“ O.C
XYLOSMA CONGESTUM ‘COMPACTA’ COMPACT XYLOSMA L 5 GAL 48” O.C

GROUNDCOVER

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE SPACING
ACHILLEA X’ANTHEA’ ANTHEA YARROW L FLATTED 24” O.C
DIANELLA REVOLUTA ‘BABY BLISS’ BABY FLAX L FLATTED 24” O.C PELARGONIUM PELTATUM ‘RED’ RED IVY GERANIUM M FLATTED 24” O.C ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ROSEMARY L FLATTED 24” O.C
‘COLLINGWOOD INGRAM’
SENECIO MANDRALISCAE BLUE FINGER L FLATTED 24” O.C

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
Landscape Architecture
3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626
O: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 bgb-inc.com
Planning Urban Design

TRASH ENCLOSURE

BIOFILTRATION
BASIN

BIOFILTRATION BASIN
D.G. ACCESS

SERVICE ROAD

PRIVATE YARD AREA - TYPICAL

RETAINING WALL

TRASH ENCLOSURE

TRASH ENCLOSURE
GATE

OPEN SPACE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN

LONG BEACH, CA

RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL
06/29/2022
L-2 0 80 feet
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 120 160
SHRUBS

CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE - OPEN SPACE AREA

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE SPACING
ACHILLEA X ‘MOONSHINE’ MOONSHINE YARROW L 1 GAL 48”
BACCHARIS PILULARIS ‘PIGEON POINT’ COYOTE BRUSH L 1 GAL 48” CARISSA MACROCARPA ‘GREEN CARPET’ GREEN CARPET NATAL PLUM L 1 GAL 36” CAREX DIVULSA BERKELEY SEDGE L 1 GAL 24”
CARPENTERIA CALIFORNICA BUSH ANEMONE L 1 GAL 48”
ENCELIA FARINOSA BRITTLE BUSH L 1 GAL 36”
LANTANA X ‘NEW GOLD’ NEW GOLD LANTANA L 1 GAL 48”
MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS ‘REGAL MIST’ TM MUHLY L 1 GAL 60” ROMNEYA COULTERI MATILIJA POPPY L 1 GAL 60”

TURF - DROUHT RESISTANT FESCUE BLEND

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
Landscape Architecture
3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626
O: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 bgb-inc.com
Planning Urban Design

OPEN TURF ACTIVITIES - INFORMAL INTERPRETIVE PANEL EXAMPLES (BGB DESIGN GROUP)

OPEN SPACE PARCEL

BUTTERFLY / POLLINATOR GARDEN

PARCOURSE EXERCISE ACTIVITIES

CALIFORNIA - FRIENDLY PLANTINGS TONGVA / NATIVE AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE PANELS

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE QTY
PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE M 15 GAL
TOTAL QTY 27
CHITALPA X TASHKENTENSIS CHITALPA L 15 GAL
SAMBUCUS NIGRA BLACK ELDER L 15 GAL
TOTAL QTY 50
NOTE : FINAL TREE SPECIES AND LOCATIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED AFTER SOIL FERTILITY

AND TOPSOIL DEPTH / DRAINAGE SPECIFICATIONS ARE ESTABLISHED QUERCUS SPECIES OAK TREE L 15 GAL
PINUS SPECIES PINE TREE L 15 GAL
TOTAL QTY 6

CONCEPTUAL TREE LEGEND - OPEN SPACE AREA CONCEPTUAL PLANT PALETTE - BUTTERFLY GARDEN SHRUBS

GENUS / SPECIES COMMON NAME WUCOLS SIZE SPACING
ASCLEPIAS CURASSAVICA BLOOD FLOWER L 1 GAL 36”
BUDDLEJA X ‘DWARF PLUM’ DWARF PLUM BUTTERFLY BUSH M 1 GAL 36” BUDDLEJA X ‘PINK MICRO CHIP’ TM PINK MICRO CHIP BUTTERFLY BUSH L 1 GAL 36” EPILOBIUM CALIFORNICA ‘U.C. HYBRID’ CALIFORNIA FUCHSIA L 1 GAL 36” LANTANA CAMARA ‘BANDANA CHERRY’ BANDANA CHERRY LANTANA L 1 GAL 48” SALVIA CLEVELANDII CLEVELAND SAGE L 1 GAL 60”
SALVIA X ‘AMISTAD’ FRIENDSHIP SAGE M 1 GAL 60”
SESLERIA AUTUMNALIS AUTUMN MOOR GRASS M 1 GAL 24”
TECOMA STANS YELLOW BELLS L 1 GAL 60”

PLATANUS RACEMOSA

CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE

CHITALPA X TASHKENTENSIS

CHITALPA

SAMBUCUS NIGRA

BLACK ELDER

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA

COAST LIVE OAK

PINUS TORREYANA

TORREY PINE

OPEN SPACE PARCEL TABULATION
TURF AREA: 65,659 SF 1.51 AC 32%
SHRUB AREA: 99,316 SF 2.28 AC 48%
WALKWAYS: 16,536 SF 0.37 AC 7%
ACCESS ROAD: 15,466 SF 0.36 AC 7%
D.G.: 11,270 SF 0.26 AC 5%
TOT LOT: 1,230 SF 0.03 AC 1%
TOTAL: 209,477 SF 4.81 AC 100%

BAKER STREET

NATURAL GRASS

SOCCER FIELD
120’ X 210’

PAR-COURSE EXERCISE
STATION (5 TOTAL)

TONGVA / NATIVE AMERICAN
INTERPRETIVE SIGN (3 TOTAL)

WILDFLOWER
MEADOW

BUTTERFLY
GARDEN
40’ LACFCD EASEMENT

CALIFORNIA-FRIENDLY

PLANTINGS- LOW

CAL TRANS EASMENT

EXISTING

BAKER STREET
PARK

EXISTING

TOT LOT

PICNIC AREA IN

DECOMPOSED GRANITE

EXISTING TREES

TO REMAIN
TOT PLAY - 2 TO 5
YEARS

LOS ANGELES RIVER
RESIDENTIAL AREA, SEE SHEET L-1
SHEET L-1
KEY MAP N.T.S
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90° GOLDEN AVENUE WARDLOW ROAD LOS ANGELES RIVER ΔΔ Δ Δ TH UNIT #62 FF= 39.00 TH UNIT #56 FF= 36.98 REC. BLDG. FF=37.50 CONDO UNIT @220 FF=41.90 CONDO UNIT #219 FF=41.12 CONDO UNIT #218 FF=41.73 CONDO UNIT #221 FF=42.80 CONDO UNIT #164 FF=40.04 CONDO UNIT # 164 CONDO UNIT #163 FF=39.79 CONDO UNIT #162 FF=39.66 CONDO UNIT #161 FF=39.42 CONDO UNIT #160 FF=39.29 CONDO UNIT #159 FF=39.05 CONDO UNIT #158 FF=38.92 CONDO UNIT #157 FF=38.68 CONDO UNIT #156 FF=38.56 CONDO UNIT #155 FF=38.32 CONDO UNIT #154 FF=38.18 CONDO UNIT #153 FF=38.32 CTH UNIT #4 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #3 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #2 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #1 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #12 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #11 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #10 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #9 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #8 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #7 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #6 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #5 GFF= 35.64 CTH UNIT #20 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #18 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #17 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #16 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #14 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #13 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #19 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #15 GFF= 35.96 CTH UNIT #28 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #26 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #25 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #24 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #22 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #21 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #27 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #23 GFF= 36.38 CTH UNIT #35 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #34 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #30 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #29 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #36 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #31 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #33 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #32 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #38 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #37 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #40 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #39 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #41 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #43 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #42 GFF= 37.33 CTH UNIT #44 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #45 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #46 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #47 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #48 GFF= 36.96 CTH UNIT #49 GFF= 36.31 CTH UNIT #50 GFF= 36.31 CTH UNIT #51 GFF= 36.31 CTH UNIT #52 GFF= 36.31 CTH UNIT #53 GFF= 36.31 TH UNIT #55 FF= 36.98 TH UNIT #54 FF= 36.98 GFF= 36.48 TH UNIT #57 FF= 36.98 TH UNIT #61 FF= 39.00 TH UNIT #60 FF= 39.00 TH UNIT #59 FF= 39.00 TH UNIT #58 FF= 39.00 TH UNIT #65 FF= 37.55 TH UNIT #66 FF= 37.55 GFF= 37.05 TH UNIT #63 FF= 37.55 TH UNIT #64 FF= 37.55 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 TH UNIT #76 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #75 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #74 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #73 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #72 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #71 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #82 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #81 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #80 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #79 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #78 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #77 FF= 39.85 TH UNIT #70 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #69 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #68 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #67 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #88 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #87 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #86 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #85 FF= 39.38 TH UNIT #84 FF= 39.38 CONDO UNIT #222 FF=42.62 LOT 33 UNIT #217 FF=41.61 CONDO UNIT #216 FF=41.30 CONDO UNIT #223 FF=42.31 CONDO UNIT #215 FF=41.17 CONDO UNIT #224 FF=42.19 CONDO UNIT #214 FF=40.94 CONDO UNIT #225 FF=41.95 CONDO UNIT #226 FF=41.81 CONDO UNIT #213 FF=40.11 TH UNIT 89 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 121 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 120 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 137 FF= 41.73 GFF= 42.02 CONDO
UNIT
#197
FF=40.77
CONDO UNIT #197 CONDO UNIT #198 FF=40.52 CONDO UNIT #199 FF=40.38 CONDO UNIT #203 FF=39.56 CONDO UNIT #208 FF=38.21 CONDO UNIT #211 FF=36.41 CONDO UNIT #212 FF=35.97 CONDO UNIT #200 FF=40.12 CONDO UNIT #201 FF=40.00 CONDO UNIT #204 FF=39.42 CONDO UNIT #205 FF=39.19 ONDO UNIT #206 FF=39.06 CONDO UNIT #207 FF=38.82 CONDO UNIT #209 FF=37.61 CONDO UNIT #210 FF=37.21 AA BB CC CONDO UNIT #202 FF=39.81 TH UNIT #83 FF= 39.38 GFF= 36.48 GFF= 36.48 GFF= 36.48 GFF= 38.50 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 39.35 GFF= 38.50 GFF= 38.50 GFF= 38.50 GFF= 38.50 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 38.88 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 37.05 GFF= 37.05 GFF= 37.05 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN (SHEET 1 OF 2) INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PREPARED BY: CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS 17530 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 756-6440 90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
45°
90°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
45°
45°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
45°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90°
90° 90°
90°
90°
90°
BAKER STREET LOS ANGELES RIVERGOLDEN AVENUE CONDO UNIT #175 FF=42.02 CONDO UNIT #176 FF=42.26 CONDO UNIT #177 FF=42.39 CONDO UNIT #178 FF=44.20 CONDO UNIT #174 FF=41.89 CONDO UNIT #173 FF=41.65 CONDO UNIT #172 FF=41.46 CONDO UNIT #171 FF=40.27 CONDO UNIT #170 FF=41.14 CONDO UNIT #169 FF=40.90 CONDO UNIT #168 FF=40.77 CONDO UNIT #167 FF=40.54 CONDO UNIT #166 FF=40.41 CONDO UNIT #165 FF=40.17 CONDO UNIT # 164
FF=40.04 CONDO UNIT #179 FF=44.45 CONDO UNIT #180 FF=44.32 CONDO UNIT #181 FF=44.06 CONDO UNIT #182 FF=43.92 CONDO UNIT #183 FF=43.72 CONDO UNIT #184 FF=43.52 CONDO UNIT #185 FF=43.00 CONDO UNIT #186 FF=42.86 CONDO UNIT #187 FF=42.66 CONDO UNIT #188 FF=42.41 CONDO UNIT #189 FF=42.22 CONDO UNIT #190 FF=42.09 CONDO UNIT #191 FF=41.84 CONDO UNIT #192 FF=41.70 CONDO UNIT #193 FF=41.51 CONDO UNIT #194 FF=41.27 CONDO UNIT #195 FF=41.14 CONDO UNIT #196 FF=40.90 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.61 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 41.86 TH UNIT 90 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 91 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 92 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 93 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 94 FF= 42.52 UNIT 89 TH UNIT 98 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 95 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 96 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 97 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 99 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 100 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 101 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 102 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 103 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 104 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 131 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 132 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 133 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 134 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 135 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 136 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 130 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 127 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 128 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 129 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 122 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 123 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 124 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 125 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 126 FF= 41.73 UNIT 121 UNIT 120 TH UNIT 119 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 118 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 117 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 116 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 115 FF= 42.52 TH UNIT 111 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 105 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 110 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 114 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 113 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 112 FF= 43.11 TH UNIT 109 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 108 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 107 FF= 43.93 TH UNIT 106 FF= 43.93 UNIT 137 TH UNIT 138 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 139 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 140 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 141 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 142 FF= 41.73 TH UNIT 146 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 152 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 147 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 143 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 144 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 145 FF= 42.36 TH UNIT 148 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 149 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 150 FF= 43.12 TH UNIT 151 FF= 43.12 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 41.02 CONDO UNIT #197
FF=40.77 DD GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 41.02 GFF= 41.02 GFF= 42.61 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 43.43 GFF= 42.61 GFF= 42.61 GFF= 42.61 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 42.02 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.23 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 41.86 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 GFF= 42.62 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN (SHEET 2 OF 2) INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PREPARED BY: CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS 17530 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 (949) 756-6440 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA RIVER PARK RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY GRADING SECTIONS (SHEET 3 OF 3) INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PREPARED BY: CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS 20411 SW Birch Street - Suite 310 Newport Beach, California 92660 (949) 756-6440 Fax (949) 756-6444 SECTION C-C SECTION A-A SECTION D-D SECTION B-B

RIVER PARK|ROWTOWNS

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
6-UNIT ROWTOWNS CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | FIRST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | SECOND FLOOR
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-D

COLOR AS
- ALL METAL
- HORIZONT
- PAINT BREA
- SOFFITS SH
-EAGLE ROOF
-ROCKMILL T
- TIERRA Y FU
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
4-UNIT ROW TOWNS
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 03.23.20
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-DECORATIVE ITEMS SUCH AS METER DOORS, NON-DECORATIVE VENTS ARE TO BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS THE SURROUNDING COLORPAINT FINISH IS ‘FLAT’
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
OO|SS SW 0047
SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-DECORATIVE ITEMS SUCH AS METER DOORS, NON-DECORATIVE VENTS ARE TO BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS THE SURROUNDING COLOR. PAINT FINISH IS ‘FLAT.’ - ALL METAL ROOF VENTS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE DARKEST COLOR FROM THE ROOFING BLEND. - HORIZONTAL WALL FLASHING MATCHES ROOF TILE COLOR.
- PAINT BREAKS TO BE TUNRED AND FINISHED AT INSIDE CORNER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - SOFFITS SHOULD BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS FASCIA.
-EAGLE ROOFING PLEASE CONTACT : Michele Morse| 714-981-3605| michelem@eagleroo�� -ROCKMILL TILE & STONE PLEASE CONTACT : Veronica Abbott |949.233.9133 |[email protected] - TIERRA Y FUEGO PLEASE CONTACT: www.tierrayfuego.com | 1-619-710-8885| [email protected] SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | FRONT ELEVATION | SET III

MATERIAL NOTES
-CONCRETE ‘S’ ROOF TILE
-STUCCO
-6X6 DECORATIVE TILE ACCENTS
-CEMENTITIOUS ‘WOOD’ SIDING
-STUCCO TRIM
-DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS
-DECORATIVE SHUTTERS
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | REAR ELEVATION | SET III CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | SIDE ELEVATIONS | SET III CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | FIRST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | SECOND FLOOR
RIVERPARK | ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET IV
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6006

BLACK BEAN
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET V
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
SW 6223

STILL WATER
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204 CTM SB-201 A WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET VI
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 10 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 7
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 9110

MALABAR
SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 0047SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | FRONT ELEVATION | SET IV

MATERIAL NOTES
-CONCRETE ‘S’ ROOF TILE
-STUCCO
-6X6 DECORATIVE TILE ACCENTS
-CEMENTITIOUS ‘WOOD’ SIDING
-STUCCO TRIM
-DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS
-DECORATIVE SHUTTERS
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | REAR ELEVATION | SET IV CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | SIDE ELEVATIONS | SET IV CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | FIRST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | SECOND FLOOR
RIVERPARK | ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-D

COLOR AS T
- ALL METAL
- HORIZONTA
- PAINT BREA
- SOFFITS SHO
-EAGLE ROOFI
-ROCKMILL TIL
- TIERRA Y FUE

SET VII
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 3 ‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6006

BLACK BEAN
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET VIII
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 9 ‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6223

STILL WATER
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204 CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-201 A

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET IX
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 10 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 11 ‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 9110

MALABAR
SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-202 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
6UNIT ROW TOWNS
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | FRONT ELEVATION | SET VIII

MATERIAL NOTES
-CONCRETE ‘S’ ROOF TILE
-STUCCO
-6X6 DECORATIVE TILE ACCENTS
-CEMENTITIOUS ‘WOOD’ SIDING
-STUCCO TRIM
-DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS
-DECORATIVE SHUTTERS
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | REAR ELEVATION | SET VIII CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | SIDE ELEVATIONS |SET VIII CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL ROWTOWNS 6-UNIT BUILDING | SECTIONS
RIVER PARK|BACK -TO -BACKS|HALF -BACKS

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
5-UNIT HALF-BACK CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
8-UNIT BACK-TO-BACK CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION
CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | FIRST FLOOR CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | SECOND FLOOR CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | THIRD FLOOR

MATERIAL NOTES
-CONCRETE ‘S’ ROOF TILE
-STUCCO
-DECORATIVE CORBELS
-CEMENTITIOUS ‘WOOD’ SIDING
-STUCCO TRIM
-DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS
-AWNING SHUTTERS
-WOOD POSTS
-WROUGHT IRON RAILING
-TERRACOTTA TILE
CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | FRONT ELEVATION | SET II RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-D

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 0047SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES
- ALL NO
COLOR
- ALL ME
- HORIZ
- PAINT
- SOFFIT
-EAGLE R
-ROCKM
- TIERRA
SET IV
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6006

BLACK BEAN
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET V
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
SW 6223

STILL WATER
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204 CTM SB-201 A WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET VI
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 10 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 7
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 9110

MALABAR
SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-203 A WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
5-UNIT HALF BACK TOWNS
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 03.23.20
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-DECORATIVE ITEMS SUCH AS METER DOORS, NON-DECORATIVE VENTS ARE TO BE PAINTED THE SAME SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 0047SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
NOTES:
- ALL NON-D

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
8-UNIT BACK TO BACKS TOWNS
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 03.23.20
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET I
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 0047SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN
SW 6236
GRAY’S HARBOR
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 8-UNIT BUILDING | SIDE ELEVATION |SET II CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | FIRST FLOOR CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | SECOND FLOOR CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | THIRD FLOOR CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | FRONT & REAR ELEVATIONS | SET IV

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES
SET IV
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 37646 DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6006

BLACK BEAN
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET V
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
SW 6223

STILL WATER
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204 CTM SB-201 A WROUGHT IRON SW 7020

BLACK FOX
SW 7020

BLACK FOX

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET VI
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 10 SCHEME 6 SCHEME 7
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551
SW 7543 SW 9110SW 7008SW 9165
RIVERPARK|ATTACHED PRODUCT

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
TRIM SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-202 A CTM SB-200 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-200 B

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD
SET II
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 7 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 8
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687 BROWN GRAY RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 7030

ANEW GRAY
TRIM SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 7025

BACKDROP
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7674

PEPPERCORN
DECORATIVE TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-203 A CTM SB-201 B CTM SB-204

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD TBD

SET III
SCHEME # SCHEME 6 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 11 SCHEME 10
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3689 BROWN RANGE
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7008

ALABASTER
SW 7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
SW 9110

MALABAR
TRIM SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 0047SW 6005SW 6034SW 6236
PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
ROOF: EAGLE
DECO TILE: ROCKMILL TILE
PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO

03.12.20 ORIGINAL DATE
CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | SIDE ELEVATION | SET IV CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 4-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL HALF-BACK TOWNS 5-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN
CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 8-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 10-UNIT BUILDING | ROOF PLAN CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 8-UNIT BUILDING | SECTIONS CONCEPTUAL BACK-TO-BACK TOWNS 8-UNIT BUILDING | SECTIONS RIVER PARK|SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

03.23.20 STREET SCENE

03.23.20 PLAN ONE | FLOOR PLAN

03.23.20 03.23.20

03.23.20 03.23.20 PLAN TWO | FLOOR PLAN

03.23.20 03.23.20

03.23.20 PLAN THREE | FLOOR PLAN

03.23.20 03.23.20

03.23.20 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION A - SPANISH COLONIAL
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

DECO TILE

03.23.20 SCHEME 1
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Spanish Brisa Collection ©
Pattern repeat CTM SB-200 A ©
CTM SB-201 A ©
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
CTM SB-200 B ©
CTM SB-201 B ©
Created and copyrighted exclusively by Rockmill, the hand-painted Spanish Brisa Collection comprises 10 ceramic tiles, each offered in two complimentary colorways for more options. Stocked in 4x4 and 6x6. Interior or exterior applications.

Stocked FOB Los Angeles warehouse. As with all handmade, glazed tile, please expect some color & size variation.

NOTES:
- ALL NON-DECORATIVE ITEMS SUCH AS METER DOORS, NON-DECORATIVE VENTS ARE TO BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS THE SURROUNDING COLOR. PAINT FINISH IS ‘FLAT.’ - ALL METAL ROOF VENTS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE DARKEST COLOR FROM THE ROOFING BLEND. - HORIZONTAL WALL FLASHING MATCHES ROOF TILE COLOR.
- PAINT BREAKS TO BE TUNRED AND FINISHED AT INSIDE CORNER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - SOFFITS SHOULD BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS FASCIA.
-EAGLE ROOFING PLEASE CONTACT : Michele Morse| 714-981-3605| michelem@eagleroo�� -ROCKMILL TILE & STONE PLEASE CONTACT : Veronica Abbott |949.233.9133 |[email protected] - TIERRA Y FUEGO PLEASE CONTACT: www.tierrayfuego.com | 1-619-710-8885| [email protected] SFD|ELEVATION A | SPANISH COLONIAL
SCHEME # SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3645

SUNRISE BLEND
3689

BROWN RANGE
37646

DESERT CLAY BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7551

GREEK VILLA
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7008

ALABASTER
TRIM SW 7513

SANDERLING
SW 7639

ETHEREAL MOOD
SW 7507

STONE LION
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7027

WELL-BRED BROWN
SW 7033

BRAINSTORM BRONZE
SW 9091

HALF-CAFF
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 9100

UMBER RUST
SW 6006

BLACK BEAN
SW 0047

STUDIO BLUE GREEN
DECO TILE CTM SB-201 A CTM SB-202 B CTM SB-202 A
CLAY PIPE SW 6061

TANBARK
SW 6061

TANBARK

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
SFD|ELEVATION B | ITALIANATE
SCHEME # SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687

BROWN GRAY RANGE
SMC 8401

SAN MIGUEL BLEND
3581

ARCADIA CANYON
BROWN
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7513

SANDERLING
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7509

TIKI HUT
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6223

STILL WATER

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
SFD|ELEVATION C | SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME # SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3646

SUNSET BLEND
3605

SAN BENITO BLEND
SHC 8709

EL MORADO BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
TRIM SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6157

FAVORITE TAN
SW 7525

TREE BRANCH
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7034

STATUS BRONZE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 2808

ROOKWOOD DARK BROWN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
ROOF: EAGLE TILE:

DECO TILE: ROCKMILL STONE STONE/ BRICK:

PAVERS: TIERRA Y FUEGO GROUT:

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION A - SPANISH COLONIAL
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

DECO TILE

03.23.20 SCHEME 3
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Spanish Brisa Collection ©
Pattern repeat CTM SB-200 A ©
CTM SB-201 A ©
CTM SB-202 A ©
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
CTM SB-200 B ©
CTM SB-201 B ©
CTM SB-202 B ©
Created and copyrighted exclusively by Rockmill, the hand-painted Spanish Brisa Collection comprises 10 ceramic tiles, each offered in two complimentary colorways for more options. Stocked in 4x4 and 6x6. Interior or exterior applications.

Stocked FOB Los Angeles warehouse. As with all handmade, glazed tile, please expect some color & size variation.

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION A - SPANISH COLONIAL
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

DECO TILE

03.23.20 SCHEME 2
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Spanish Brisa Collection ©
epeat CTM SB-200 A ©
CTM SB-201 A ©
CTM SB-202 A ©
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
Pattern repeat
epeat
epeat
CTM SB-200 B ©
CTM SB-201 B ©
CTM SB-202 B ©
nd copyrighted exclusively by Rockmill, the hand-painted Spanish Brisa Collection comprises 10 ceramic tiles, d in two complimentary colorways for more options. Stocked in 4x4 and 6x6. Interior or exterior applications.

OB Los Angeles warehouse. As with all handmade, glazed tile, please expect some color & size variation.

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION B - ITALIANATE
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 4
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
NOTES:
- ALL NON-DECORATIVE ITEMS SUCH AS METER DOORS, NON-DECORATIVE VENTS ARE TO BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS THE SURROUNDING COLOR. PAINT FINISH IS ‘FLAT.’ - ALL METAL ROOF VENTS TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE DARKEST COLOR FROM THE ROOFING BLEND. - HORIZONTAL WALL FLASHING MATCHES ROOF TILE COLOR.
- PAINT BREAKS TO BE TUNRED AND FINISHED AT INSIDE CORNER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. - SOFFITS SHOULD BE PAINTED THE SAME COLOR AS FASCIA.
-EAGLE ROOFING PLEASE CONTACT : Michele Morse| 714-981-3605| michelem@eagleroo�� -ROCKMILL TILE & STONE PLEASE CONTACT : Veronica Abbott |949.233.9133 |[email protected] - TIERRA Y FUEGO PLEASE CONTACT: www.tierrayfuego.com | 1-619-710-8885| [email protected] CLAY PIPE SW 6061

TANBARK
SW 6061

TANBARK

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
SFD|ELEVATION B | ITALIANATE
SCHEME # SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3687

BROWN GRAY RANGE
SMC 8401

SAN MIGUEL BLEND
3581

ARCADIA CANYON
BROWN
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 9165

GOSSAMER VEIL
7543

AVENUE TAN
SW 9173

SHIITAKE
TRIM SW 7031

MEGA GREIGE
SW 7541

GRECIAN IVORY
SW 7513

SANDERLING
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7026

GRIFFIN
SW 7040

SMOKEHOUSE
SW 7509

TIKI HUT
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 6187

ROSEMARY
SW 6005

FOLKSTONE
SW 6223

STILL WATER

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
SFD|ELEVATION C | SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME # SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3646

SUNSET BLEND
3605

SAN BENITO BLEND
SHC 8709

EL MORADO BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
TRIM SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6157

FAVORITE TAN
SW 7525

TREE BRANCH
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7034

STATUS BRONZE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 2808

ROOKWOOD DARK BROWN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION B - ITALIANATE
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 5
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION B - ITALIANATE
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 6
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION C - SANTA BARBARA
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 7
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD
SFD|ELEVATION C | SANTA BARBARA
SCHEME # SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9
‘S’ TILE ROOF 3646

SUNSET BLEND
3605

SAN BENITO BLEND
SHC 8709

EL MORADO BLEND
PRIMARY STUCCO SW 7568

NEUTRAL GROUND
SW 6155

RICE GRAIN
SW 7575

CHOPSTICKS
TRIM SW 9117

URBAN JUNGLE
SW 6157

FAVORITE TAN
SW 7525

TREE BRANCH
FASCIA

GARAGE DOOR

WOOD SIDING
SW 7034

STATUS BRONZE
SW 6069

FRENCH ROAST
SW 2808

ROOKWOOD DARK BROWN
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS SW 7598

SIERRA REDWOOD
SW 7729

EDAMAME
SW 6034

ARRESTING AUBURN

PAVERS TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA TERRA COTTA

WINDOW FRAME TBD TBD TBD

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION C - SANTA BARBARA
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 9
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED

ELEVATION C - SANTA BARBARA
ROOF
STUCCO
TRIM
FASCIA|GARAGE DOOR|WOOD SIDING
ENTRY DOOR|SHUTTERS

03.23.20 SCHEME 8
RIVER PARK| INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES

LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

1.800.MILGARD · milgard.com
Style Line® Series Vinyl Windows & Doors
4 5
Milgard Style Line® Series vinyl windows and doors are designed and assembled in the U.S.A. and we build them to last. With the dedication to quality that we put into building the best windows in the business, it wouldn’t make sense to back them with anything but the best warranty in the business. That’s why we back every properly installed window and door for as long as the homeowner owns their home–including materials and labor. Milgard also offers a 10-year Commercial Warranty. It’s why you can be sure you won’t find any windows better than Milgard. For complete warranty details, visit milgard.com.

Why Milgard?
Milgard is one of the largest and most trusted names in windows and doors. For the last 50 years, we’ve demonstrated our commitment to innovation, quality and service. To ensure top quality from start to finish, Milgard begins by extruding our own vinyl components and fabricating all vinyl windows and doors to order, giving us the tightest control over quality.

While our coverage is extensive, our service is local. Milgard has multiple locations throughout the western U.S. Our belief is that by being close to our customers, we can provide them better service. This means faster lead and delivery times, as well as faster response to any warranty situations. We’re there for you long after the job has been completed. Milgard also has a comprehensive network of qualified dealers and offers them some of the best training in the industry.

Milgard Full Lifetime Warranty
peace of mind All Your Needs are Covered
• Worry-free vinyl construction that won’t corrode and does not need painting.
• Custom sizes built to your exact specifications with no extra lead time. • Positive Action Lock that assures you when the window is closed, it’s locked.
• Optional Comfort Package upgrade to maximize efficiency and durability. (see page 11)
• Seemingly endless combinations of windows, doors, and transoms in any array you can imagine.
• Style Line Series windows are specifically designed for both new construction and replacement projects, plus they are a great choice for multi-family buildings.
• The standard dual-pane construction provides more noise control than single-pane windows, giving you more peace and quiet.

Hassle-free Installation
Style Line Series windows can be manufactured with the specific frame profile for your replacement or new construction project, giving the flexibility your installer requires.

Installation Configurations
Block Frame
Enables quick “tiltin” installation with
almost no disruption
to siding or interior
trim casework.

Nailing Fin
Perfect for home
additions and
remodeling where
siding or stucco is
removed.

Z-bar
Integrated window trim
that makes replacing
windows on stucco
homes fast and easy,
reducing the possibility
of costly repairs.

Style Line Series windows with Z-bar
6 7
Options that reflect your style.

Choose the style or configuration that best suits your
home’s style and architectural needs.

Windows are shown with optional grids. Check with your
local Milgard Dealer for available grid styles.

Picture
Min 1’x1’ – Max 8’x6’
Gables vary by size and shape
Structural Class HC-40
Radius/Arch Top
Min/Max - varies by size and shape
Structural Class HC-40
Not available at all locations
Sliding Patio Doors
Windows are only the beginning. With Milgard sliding patio doors, you can complete your entire home with the quality of Milgard. Our Style Line Series patio doors are made with the same attention to detail and commitment to quality found in every Milgard product. Your home will feel like new for a long time to come.

The Style Line Series patio door features a narrow frame that provides an excellent value and maximum glass area, perfectly complementing the windows. (Style Line Series patio doors not available at all locations.)
Single Hung
Min 1’x2’6” – Max 4’x6’6”
Structural Class LC-30
Horizontal Slider
(Half Vent)
Min 2’x1’ – Max 6’x6’
Structural Class LC-25
Awning
Min 1’6”x1’6” – Max 4’x3’
Structural Class C-40
Casement
Min 1’6”x1’8” – Max 3’x6’
Structural Class LC-35
Min/Max is based on tested values, sizes may vary by location. Contact your local Milgard dealer for details.

Structural Class ratings may vary based on window size. For more information, visit milgard.com. 8 9
Matelux
Narrow Reed Glue Chip
Rain
Flat Grid
Sculptured Grid
Aquatex Cross Reed
P516 Clear 42
Positive Action Lock
With its simple operation, the Milgard Positive Action Lock is window hardware you can count on to perform. Made to close and lock the window securely in one action, it eliminates any guessing. If the window is closed, it’s locked. Plus, it meets and exceeds the toughest residential forced entry codes in the nation, making your windows beautiful and safer.

Premium Exterior Vinyl Finishes
Style Line Series gives you design flexibility with eight premium and two standard exterior colors.

Bronze Espresso Classic Brown Tweed
White Tan
Silver Fog Sand
Premium
White interior only
Standard Make it your own. Matching interior
Grids
Express your creativity and dramatically increase your home’s curb appeal with our virtually endless grid options. They are placed inside the glass unit for easy cleaning.

Decorative Glass
Decorative glass can add privacy or design to any
room. The decorative glass of your choice can
be tempered, which turns it into safety glass for
applications such as a shower or over a bathtub.

Decorative glass is available in these and many
more styles and tints.

Review from milgard.com -
The product line is beautiful, with slim
frames and smooth mechanisms. They
control heat loss/transfer and I hear
NOTHING when cars pass by. The
sound insulation quality has exceeded
expectations. I have casement and
horizontal sliders and they both operate
effortlessly. The overall design of this
product is brilliant, tight, smart, elegant and
designed for a very fussy buyer/homeowner.
–Palm Springs, CA
Casement and Awning Hardware
The operating hardware for casement and awning styles is an innovative folding handle that tucks out of the way with the locking hardware designed for smooth, easy-to-operate action.

Shown in Ivory Ivory
Colors shown are approximate due to printing limitations.

WINDOW SPECIFICATION SHEET

LONG BEACH FWY

SAN DIEGO FWY
R-1-N
CS
R-1-N
R-1-S
PR
P
R-4-R
P
Los Angeles River
IL
CS
PR
PR
R-1-N R-1-N

MAINE AVE

GOLDEN AVE
AMBECO

GOLDEN AVE

MAINE AVE

DEL MAR AVE

DAISY AVE
33RD WAY 33RD WAY

DE FOREST AVE

W WARDLOW RD
39TH ST

BAKER ST
34TH ST
W 35TH ST
38TH ST
W 37TH ST
W 36TH ST

PACIFIC
PL
±
Attachment E
AMENDMENT TO A PORTION OF PART 15
OF THE USE DISTRICT MAP Rezoning Case #
2003-24
T:\DevelopmentServices\Planning\Zoning\Zone_Change_Maps\Rezoning Case No. 2003-24 (712 Baker St)\712 Baker St.mxd Area to be modified from
CS (Commercial Storage)
to
RP-15
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac)
Area to be modified from
CS (H)
(Commercial Storage, Horse overlay)
to
RP-15 (H)
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac, Horse overlay)
Area to be modified from
R-1-N
(Single-family Residential, standard lot)
to
RP-15
(Residential, Planned Unit Development,
15 du/ac)
Area to be modified from R-1-N to RP-15
Area to be modified from CS to RP-15 Area to be modified from CS(H) to RP-15(H) Attachment F

ZONE CHANGE FINDINGS
712 Baker Street (former Oil Operators, Inc. property)
APNs: 7203-002-001, 7203-002-005, 7203-002-007, 7203-002-008, 7203-002-009, 7203-002-010
Application No. 2003-24, VTTM20-002
November 15, 2022 (City Council)
Pursuant to Section 21.25.106 of the Long Beach Municipal Code, in all cases, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall be required to make the following findings of fact before rezoning a parcel. These findings and staff analysis are presented for consideration, adoption and incorporation into the record of proceedings:

1. THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE

CHARACTER, LIVABILITY OR APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURROUNDING AREA; AND
Positive Finding: The project site is currently zoned CS (Commercial Storage) over most of the site. A small area in the southwest of the site is zoned R-1-N (Singlefamily Residential, standard lot). The Horse (H) Overlay also applies to approximately the eastern half of the CS zoning on the site. (See Figure 1 below for a zoning map excerpt illustrating the proposed rezoning). The site is proposed to be rezoned to “RP-15” (Residential, Planned Unit Development, 15 dwelling units per acre), which would allow a residential planned unit development project at up to 15 DU/ac. The H overlay will remain as-is, and the eastern half of the site will be rezoned to RP-15 (H).

The project is sited on the north side of Wardlow Road and bounded on the west by Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) parcels containing the Los Angeles River, with the western property line of the development site located approximately 160 feet east of the top of the eastern embankment of the Los Angeles River. The intervening undeveloped space is owned and managed by Los Angeles County, and is used primarily for maintenance access to the flood control channel of the Los Angeles River. To the north, beyond the proposed park, the project site is bounded by the San Diego Freeway (I-405) and the Caltrans rightof-way and embankment. Neither the LACFCD or freeway zoning areas contain any occupied land uses (neither residences nor businesses). Neither of these areas would be substantially affected by this proposed rezoning, as the rezoning and development of this project would not change the way in which the LACFCD flood control channel and Los Angeles River are used, nor would the project change the way in which the San Diego Freeway is used.

To the east, the project site is bordered by the City’s Baker Street Park on the north side of Baker Street, and by Golden Avenue south of Baker Street. The development site abuts the Wrigley Heights Dog Park on its southeastern edge.

The Baker Street Park currently is split-zoned between the Single Familiy Residential with standard lots (R-1-N) and Commercial Storage (CS) Zoning Findings – Zone Change
712 Baker Street (former Oil Operators, Inc. site)
App No. 2003-24
November 15, 2022 (City Council)

Page 2 of 33 ends

Long Beach City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

Long Beach City Council
November 15, 2022