RES-23-0102 Part 3.pdf — Long Beach City Council, July 18, 2023 (part 5 of 5)

area based on this trip budget.1 The trip budget allows for flexibility in the land uses proposed within the SEASP. As long as the collective project trips associated with proposed development projects do not exceed the trip budget analyzed in the PEIR, the projects can be found to be consistent with the findings of the PEIR, and no additional transportation analyses would be required for a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The SEASP has a 5,432 PM Peak Hour trip budget available for use within the 85-acres of the specific plan designated for mixed use projects, inclusive of 2,719 trips for existing uses active at the time the SEASP transportation impact analysis was prepared, for a total trip budget of 2,713 net-new project trips.

The transportation analysis of the SEASP PEIR used the Mixed-Use Development (MXD) trip generation methodology. As detailed in the Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan Transportation Impact Analysis2, the MXD methodology was developed in partnership with the Unites States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to more accurately estimate the internalization of project trips associated with mixed use developments and districts, and the associated net external trip generation of mixed-use projects, which typically generate fewer vehicle trips than single use developments located in more isolated settings. The MXD methodology adjusts typical Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip rates to reflect the internalization and site-specific attributes of mixed-use developments. The MXD model was developed and calibrated to 239 existing mixed-use developments.

The SEASP indicates that “internalization of trips due to project design (internal trip capture) or TDM strategies applied shall be incorporate into the analysis [of projects] using best practice methodologies. At the time of publication of this Specific Plan, best practices include use of…the EPA’s mixed use trip generation (MXD) methodology.”3 Subsequent to the development of the original MXD methodology, Fehr & Peers has updated and refined the methodology to include additional model sensitivities, updated ITE trip generation rates, and updated input data calculated from the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG) travel demand model (TDFM), which includes the SEASP area. Additionally, the MXD methodology collected data from additional mixed-use development sites to use for additional model validation purposes.

This methodology, MXD 2.0, has been incorporated into Fehr & Peers’ MainStreet trip generation tool, which represents the current best practice for mixed-use trip generation. The evaluation of the proposed project’s trip generation has been conducted using the MainStreet tool. 1 Southeast Area Specific Plan, City of Long Beach, October 8, 2020. Page 226. Accessed 4/8/2022 from:
https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ 2 Final Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan Transportation Impact Analysis, Fehr & Peers, February 2017.

Page J1-37. Accessed 4/15/2022 from https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ 3 Southeast Area Specific Plan, City of Long Beach, Page 228. Accessed 4/8/2022 from:
https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 3 of 11 ends

Trip Generation Estimates
The proposed Project’s existing land uses to be removed and proposed uses to be added were input into the MainStreet tool with the difference between them reflecting the net external trip generation for the proposed Project. Consistent with the transportation impact study for the SEASP EIR, the SCAG TDFM was used to update estimates of employment accessible to the proposed Project site. However, the TDFM employment within one mile of the proposed Project was updated to reflect the completion of the 2nd & PCH project which opened in 2020, and is getting closer to being fully leased out.

As detailed in Table 1, the proposed Project is expected to generate 9 net external PM peak hour trips with an estimated MXD trip reduction of 20% compared with raw ITE Trip Generation rates.

The SEASP had an estimated 18% MXD trip reduction4. The increase in the percentage of the trip reduction is associated with the buildout of projects within the SEASP (such as the 2nd & PCH project), as well as the improved accuracy of the updated MXD methodology, which reduces the overestimation of net external project trips.

Table 2 details the available trip budget by SEASP quadrant and total plan area. After accounting for trips associated with the 2nd & PCH project, as well as the proposed Project, the SEASP would stay within the plan area trip budget, as well as within the trip budget for the Southwest Quadrant, which encompasses Blocks 2 and 3 as shown below in Figure 1. As demonstrated by this analysis, the proposed Project is consistent with the transportation impact analysis findings of the SEASP PEIR.
4 Final Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan Transportation Impact Analysis, Fehr & Peers, February 2017.

Page J1-41. Accessed 4/15/2022 from https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ Rate In% Out% Rate In% Out% In Out Total In Out Total

PROPOSED PROJECT
Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 221 281 DU 4.54 0.37 23% 77% 0.39 61% 39% 1,276 24 80 104 67 43 110 Less: MXD Reduction [b] 21% 24% 24% 20% 20% (268) (6) (19) (25) (13) (9) (22) Net External Vehicle Trips 1,008 18 61 79 54 34 88
Retail (<40 ksf) 820 3.10 ksf 54.45 2.36 60% 40% 6.59 50% 50% 169 4 3 7 10 10 20 Less: MXD Reduction [b] 21% 24% 24% 20% 20% (35) (1) (1) (2) (2) (2) (4) Net External Vehicle Trips 134 3 2 5 8 8 16
TOTAL PROJECT EXTERNAL VEHICLE TRIPS 1,142 21 63 84 62 42 104

EXISTING USE CREDIT
Office 710 73.08 ksf 10.84 1.52 88% 12% 1.44 17% 83% 792 98 13 111 18 87 105 Less: MXD Reduction [b] 11% 12% 12% 9% 9% (87) (12) (2) (14) (2) (8) (10) Net External Vehicle Trips 705 86 11 97 16 79 95
TOTAL EXISTING USE CREDIT 705 86 11 97 16 79 95
NET INCREMENTAL EXTERNAL TRIPS 437 -65 52 -13 46 -37 9
Notes:

TABLE 1
6700 PCH PROJECT, LONG BEACH

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATE
ITE Land
Use Code Size
Trip Generation Rates [a] Estimated Trip Generation
Daily
Land Use AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour Trips
[a] Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 11th Edition , 2021 PM Peak Hour
Daily
PM Peak Hour Trips
[b] This percentage is a total reduction associated with walking, biking, transit use, and internal capture. It is informed by MXD 2.0 Mixed Use Trip Generation Methodology, which incorporated the findings of NCHRP Project 8-51 as described in "Improved Estimation for Internal Trip Capture for Mixed-use Developments," ITE Journal, August 2010. Internal capture represents the percentage of trips between land uses that occur within the site. MXD assumptions were modified in accordance with information provided in the Southeast Area Specific Plan EIR , Appendix J1 (TIA), 2021.

TABLE 2
6700 PCH PROJECT, LONG BEACH

SEASP TRIP BUDGET BY QUADRANT
Project Number Project 1 Project 2
Project Name 2nd and PCH [c] 6700 PCH
Completion Date 2020
Block Mixed Use Development Areas
PM Trip
Budget [a]
Existing PM Trip Gen
[b]
PM Peak Hour
Trips
PM Peak Hour
Trips
Remaining
Trips
1 Northwest Quadrant 2nd/PCH (Marina Pacifica) 1,847 1,472 375 2&3 Southwest Quadrant 2nd/PCH 1,361 423 792 9 137
4 Southeast Quadrant 2nd/PCH 1,369 558 811
5 Northeast Quadrant 2nd/PCH (In n Out) 173 160 13
6 Mixed Use Marina 682 106 576
Total Trips: 5,432 2,719 792 9 1,912
Notes
[a] Based on selected Reduced Intensity Alternative, accounts for existing+future traffic and includes adjustment for pass-by-trips not included in the SEASP TIA [b] Existing at the time of the completion of the 2017 SEASP TIA. Completed projects since then are listed under the project columns. [c] Trip generation source: 2nd+PCH Project Traffic Impact Analysis , LLG, 2017 Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 6 of 11 ends

Figure 1 – SEASP Plan Area Quadrants
Vehicle Miles Travelled Consistency Evaluation
Analysis Approach
The methodologies and thresholds of significance used to assess the transportation impacts of the SEASP EIR were consistent with the City of Long Beach’s adopted methodologies and thresholds of significance at the time the analysis was conducted. Intersection level of service (LOS) was the primary quantified transportation metric used to evaluate the SEASP. However, for informational purposes, a vehicle miles travelled (VMT) analysis was included in the EIR.5 After the certification of the Final PEIR for the SEASP, the City of Long Beach adopted revised transportation impact study methodologies and thresholds of significance for assessing transportation impacts. These changes were made to update the City’s approach to evaluating transportation impacts under CEQA in accordance with the changes made to CEQA statute by Senate Bill (SB) 743. These changes required that lead agencies no longer use intersection LOS in the determination of impact significance under transportation. The State of California’s Governor’s 5 Southeast Area Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, City of Long Beach, July 2016. Page 5.16-47 through 5.16-48. Accessed April 15, 2022 from
https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 7 of 11 ends

Office of Planning and Research (OPR) issued a Technical Advisory6 recommending that VMT be used as the primary transportation metric for assessing transportation impacts under CEQA. The City of Long Beach adopted revised transportation impact study guidelines that are largely consistent with OPR’s Technical Advisory.

The SEASP EIR was prepared before the implementation of SB 743. Therefore, the required VMT analysis methodologies that the City was going to adopt were not known at that time. However, in anticipation of SB 743, a VMT analysis was included in the SEASP EIR. A total VMT estimate and a VMT estimate per service population (population+employment) for the SEASP Area was prepared using the SCAG TDFM. While the summarization of VMT in the SEASP EIR is not consistent with the City’s current transportation impact study guidelines, it was done using the same required analysis tool. The City’s current guidelines generally express VMT in a per-capita basis, compared against Los Angeles County as a regional baseline.

Given that the City’s intention for the SEASP is to allow developments to tier off of the SEASP EIR through a finding of consistency, VMT analysis would need to follow the approach taken in the SEASP EIR to be consistent. To evaluate this consistency the following analysis approach for VMT was conducted:

1. The SCAG TDFM was used in combination with the MXD trip generation methodology to estimate total project VMT. This analysis was conducted by calculating updated average trip lengths by trip purpose for the Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) that contains the proposed Project multiplied by daily net external vehicle trip generation as estimated using the MXD trip generation methodology.

2. The total project VMT estimated based on the methodology described above was compared to the SEASP VMT budget as identified in the SEASP EIR. Using a similar framework as the PM peak hour trip budget, the proposed Project’s total VMT, along with the total VMT of other approved and proposed projects provided by the City of Long Beach within the SEASP was deducted from the total VMT for the SEASP. If there is still VMT budget available, then the project would be consistent with the VMT findings of the SEASP EIR, and no further CEQA transportation analysis would be required.
6 Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. OPR, December 2019. Accessed December 3, 2021 from https://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/20190122-743_Technical_Advisory.pdf Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 8 of 11 ends

Consistent with the PEIR, the TDFM was used to estimate trip lengths. However, the updated 2016 SCAG Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) model was used. This model was also used for the City of Long Beach’s current Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines.7 The base year and future year models were used to extract actual trip length by trip purpose for the traffic analysis zone containing the proposed Project. The model’s congested network assignment skim matrices to derive trip length by trip purpose (e.g. home-based work (HBW), home-based other (HBO), and non-home based (NHB)) for both trips that are attractions and trips that are productions. As detailed in the SEASP EIR, calculating trip length in this way provides trip length information that is compatible with the mixed-use trip generation model and provides a full-accounting methodology for VMT estimation (e.g. it incorporates the entire length of the trip).

The updated trip length information by trip purpose for both productions and attractions is summarized below reflecting the updated data from the 2016 SCAG TDFM:
 Existing (2016 Base Year)
o Productions (length by trip purpose):
 HBW – 8.5 miles
 HBO – 13.7 miles
 NHB – 8.0 miles
o Attractions (length by trip purpose):
 HBW – 15.8 miles
 HBO – 9.5 miles
 NHB – 8.6 miles
 Future Year (Year 2040)
o Productions (length by trip purpose):
 HBW – 13.3 miles
 HBO – 7.7 miles
 NHB – 6.8 miles
o Attractions (length by trip purpose):
 HBW – 15.6 miles
 HBO – 9.2 miles
 NHB – 7.5 miles
7 Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. City of Long Beach, June 2020. Page 5. Accessed April 15, 2022 from https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/lbds/medialibrary/documents/planning/environmental/environmental-planning/tia-guidelines Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 9 of 11 ends

VMT Estimates
Total VMT
MainStreet was used to estimate daily trip generation for the proposed Project by trip purposes consistent with the SCAG TDFM calculated trip lengths, as well as for trip productions and attractions. Existing VMT for the current uses on the proposed Project site was calculated using the MainStreet MXD trip generation output multiplied by the base year trip lengths detailed above. Existing VMT is 8,030 per day.

Future VMT was calculated using the Year 2040 trip lengths multiplied by the MainStreet MXD trip generation output for the proposed Project. Proposed Project VMT is estimated to be 12,381 per day, for a net increase of 4,351 VMT per day.

For the full SEASP, Existing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Adjusted VMT was estimated at 455,236 VMT per day, and the Future Year with Project was estimated at 633,617 VMT per day, a net increase of 178,381 VMT8. Therefore, the net increase in VMT associated with the proposed Project is expected to utilize approximately 2.4% of the total net increase VMT budget. Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the net increase in Total VMT estimates contained in the EIR and no additional CEQA transportation impact analysis is required.

VMT per Service Population
Service population is calculated by adding population plus employment. Using SCAG TDFM factors for the TAZ that contains the proposed Project Site, the average household size for the TAZ is 1.7 people per household. The 281 units of the proposed Project, would have an estimated population of approximately 478 people. Using typical TDFM employee estimates, the 3,100 square feet of retail spaces is expected to have one employee for 500 square feet of retail space, for a total of seven (7) employees. The total service population for the proposed Project would therefore be 485. The resulting VMT per service population for the proposed Project is estimated to be 25.53 (12,381 daily VMT divided by a 485 service population).

The Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Adjusted VMT Estimates per Service Population for the SEASP PEIR is 32.91. The VMT per Service Population for the proposed Project is approximately 22.3% lower than that of the SEASP.

Therefore, the proposed Project is consistent with the VMT estimates contained in the SEASP EIR, and no additional CEQA transportation impact analysis is required. 8 Recirculated DEIR Appendix J3 VMT Memo, Fehr & Peers, February 16, 2017, Page J3-6. Accessed April 15, 2022 from https://www.longbeach.gov/lbds/planning/environmental/reports/ Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 10 of 11 ends

Site Access Review
Figure 2 illustrates the proposed Project’s ground site plan with its proposed project site access points. The following narrative describes site access for various transportation modes.

Figure 2 – Proposed Project Site Access
Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian access is provided by sidewalks adjacent to the Project on the Studebaker Road and PCH frontages. Sidewalks are present on all surrounding streets except Marina Drive south of Studebaker Road. Pedestrian access to destinations along Marina Drive southwest of the Project Site is provided via walkways along the Alamitos Bay Marina, but direct sidewalk access is not currently available to these walkways in the vicinity of the Project site. The existing use and the proposed Project will not be providing any access to Marina Drive due to a lack of sidewalks along the roadway curve. The project proposes direct building access at street level to Studebaker Road and Marina Drive. Building access for pedestrians will be separate and independent from vehicular access driveways.

Bicycle Access
The following bicycle facilities are available in the vicinity of the Project Site: • Class II bicycle lanes on PCH between the Traffic Circle and Seal Beach Marina Shores Owner, LP & Amy Harbin, Long Beach Development Services, Planning Bureau January 19, 2023

Page 11 of 11 ends

Marina Drive • Class II bicycle lanes and Class IV protected bicycle lanes on 2nd Street between Belmont Shore and Seal Beach • Class I San Gabriel River Bike Trail The Project proposes secure bike parking in the building. No bike racks exist along the public ROW in the Project vicinity. The Project would not preclude the implementation of the City’s Bicycle Master Plan.

Transit Access
A southbound bus stop for Long Beach Transit (LBT) and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) is located adjacent to the Project Site on PCH. A northbound bus stop for both agencies is also located on PCH, approximately 300’ northwest of the Project Site. These stops serve LBT Route 171 and OCTA Route 1. OCTA Route 1 runs along PCH between the Long Beach Veterans Affairs Hospital/CSULB and San Clemente with headways of 1 hour throughout the day on weekdays. LBT Route 171 runs along PCH between Seal Beach and Century Villages at Cabrillo with headways of 40 minutes throughout the day on weekdays.

Vehicle Access
Vehicular access to the proposed site will be provided via one full-access driveway on Studebaker Road, leading to enclosed ground level parking, one floor of underground parking, and one floor of above ground parking. This represents a reduction of one driveway compared to the existing site use. One driveway would be adequate to serve the Project’s proposed uses.

Conclusions
The evaluation of the net external trip generation, net increase in Total VMT, and VMT per service population for the proposed Project indicates that the proposed Project is well within the available SEASP trip and VMT budgets, and therefore is consistent with the SEASP EIR, and no additional CEQA transportation impact analysis is required. Adequate site access is provided by the proposed Project for a variety of transportation modes. 6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix J Sewer Area Study
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

SEWER AREA STUDY
FOR
MRNA
Long Beach, CA 90803
Prepared for:

Jacob Stone
Holland Partner Group
5000 E Spring St, Suite 500
Long Beach, CA 90815
Prepared by:

Labib Funk + Associates
Structural | Shoring | Civil Consulting Engineers
319 Main St.

El Segundo, California 90245
LFA Job # 22029
September 13, 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

4.0 CAPACITY ANALYSIS CRITERIA

5.0 SEWER CAPACITY ANALYSIS WITH PROPOSED PROJECT

6.0 CONCLUSION

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A SEWER STUDY MAP AND EXHIBIT
APPENDIX B US3 DATA

APPENDIX C AS BUILT PLANS

APPENDIX D FLOWMASTER FLOW CALCULATION

APPENDIX E LACSD OCCUPANCY LOADING RATES AND DESIGN

CRITERIA

APPENDIX F SITE PLAN

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 1 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
The purpose of this sewer area study is to determine and show:

1. The capacity of the existing sewer pipes

2. The existing sewer facilities are adequate or inadequate for the proposed development
Figure 1: Project Site Location

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 2 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m
2 S I T E D E S C R I P T I O N
According to the city of Long Beach, the site is identified with Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) #7242-012-006 and #7242-012-007. The existing site is approximately

2.6 acres and currently consists of an office building and an asphalt-paved parking area.

The site is bounded by Pacific Coast Highway to the North, San Gabriel River to the east, Studebaker Road to the West, and Marina Dr to the South. 3 P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N
The existing site is to be demolished. The proposed development is a mixed-use buildings involving 290 residential units and approximately 3100 SF or Retail space in addition to 1 level of subterrain parking refer to Appendix F for proposed site plan.

There are 3 other planned developments that are expected to contribute to the sewer system:
6500 E PCH: 600 Units with small amount of retail
6615 E PCH: 300 Dwelling Units, 4800 SF Commercial
6701 E PCH: 5200 SF 2 story office with 9750 SF Storage, 50 Oil wells and associated storage
4 C A P A C I T Y A N A L Y S I S C R I T E R I A
The existing sewer pipes were analyzed using the Long Beach Water Department (LBWD) Sewer design criteria which requires a maximum design capacity at half full for pipes less than 15” and at three quarters full for pipes 15” and greater. The chart is based on Kutter’s Formula with “n = 0.013”. The cumulative calculated flow for each segment was compared to the sewer capacity at each segment. The equation for the tributary sewer discharge is as follows:

Q = qA
Where: Q = sewer discharge (cfs); q = Average Daily Flow (gal/day); A = Area (Acres) and Dwelling units for the apartment
The flow data was monitored with the help of US3
in Manholes 11 and 39 per the city of
Long Beach (Appendix A) for two weeks to determine the existing flow conditions in the system which was then used with the LACSD loading rates(Appendix E) to model the flow conditions in each pipe as shown in Appendix B. the peak flow depth(d/D) was taken to model the flow in the system with the help of Flowmaster (Appendix D)

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 3 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m
Size
(in.)
Slope
(ft/ft)
- 2 STORY OFFICE 79344 200.0 0.049 0.049 16.37%
-

SHOPPING
CENTER
28838 325 0.03 0.08 26.04%
*MISC ~130770 N/A 0.25 0.33 49.71%
RESTAURANT 15000 1000 0.05 0.37 56.75%
10 0.00197 0.49 - N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.37 76.43% Below Pipe Capacity
12 0.00163 0.72 0.420

SHOPPING
CENTER
41145 325 0.04 0.42 57.76%
Below Pipe
Capacity
12 0.00264 0.92 0.720 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.72 78.26% Below Pipe Capacity
Below Pipe
Capacity
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH 10) 10 0.0036 0.66

COMMENTS

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS/

CAPACITY
X100(%)

0.3 Below Pipe
Capacity
PIPE 1 (MH 31 - MH 30) 8 0.0024

BUILDING
TYPE

BUILDING
SIZE
LACSD

LOADING
FACTOR
(gpd/1000
SF)
Pipe Pipe
Capacity
(<12" 50%,
>12" 75%)
(cfs)
Segment
US^3

MONITORED
DATA

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS (cfs)
Calculated
flows per
LACSD
(cfs)
-
PIPE 3 (MH 10 - MH 11)
PIPE 4 (MH 11 - MH 39)
PIPE 5 (MH 39 - PUMP STATION)
Size
(in.)
Slope
(ft/ft)
290 156 0.140 0.14 46.66%
3100 100 0.001 0.14 46.98%

SHOPPING
CENTER
28838 325 0.029 0.17 56.65%
*MISC ~130770 N/A 0.25 0.42 63.63%
RESTAURANT 15000 1000 0.046 0.47 70.66%
10 0.00197 0.49 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.47 95.18% Below Pipe
Capacity
12 0.00163 0.72

SHOPPING
CENTER
41145 325 0.041 0.51 70.52%
Below Pipe
Capacity
12 0.00264 0.92 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.81 88.04% Below Pipe
Capacity

COMMENTS BUILDING
TYPE Segment
Pipe CUMULATIVE
FLOWS/

CAPACITY
X100(%)

BUILDING
SIZE
LACSD
FACTOR
(gpd)
Pipe Capacity
(<12" 50%,
>12" 75%)
(cfs)
Calculated flows
per LACSD

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS (cfs)
Below Pipe
Capacity
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH 10) 10 0.0036 0.66 Below Pipe
Capacity
8 0.0024 0.3

MXD USE
PROJECT PIPE 1 (MH 31 - MH 30)
PIPE 3 (MH 10 - MH 11)
PIPE 4 (MH 11 - MH 39)
PIPE 5 (MH 39 - PUMP STATION)
All existing sewer lines/mains were obtained from as-built plans (Appendix C) from city of Long Beach. Capacity in these lines would be analyzed using the Kutter’s Formula, US3
data (Appendix B) and estimated flows based on occupancies (Appendix E) from LACSD loading rates. The Pipe capacities for were calculated using Flow Master, refer to Appendix D.

The existing condition analysis is shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1: Existing Conditions
N o t e : a l l s e w e r c a p a c i t i e s a r e c a l c u l a t e d a t ½ f u l l d e p t h c a p a c i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s f o r l i n e s l e s s t h a n 1 5 ” a n d ¾ f u l l f o r g r e a t e r t h a n 1 5 ” a n d m o r e
5 S E W E R C A P A C I T Y A N A L Y S I S W I T H P R O P O S E D

P R O J E C T ( S )
The proposed project changes the existing zoning of Office Building to Mixed/ Multiuse which increases the developed area considerably more. The analysis of sewer capacity based on the proposed condition is shown in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2: Proposed Site (6700 E PCH) with Existing Sewer Lines N o t e : a l l s e w e r c a p a c i t i e s a r e c a l c u l a t e d a t ½ f u l l d e p t h c a p a c i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s f o r l i n e s l e s s t h a n 1 5 ” a n d ¾ f u l l f o r g r e a t e r t h a n 1 5 ” a n d m o r e

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 4 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m
Size
(in.)
Slope
(ft/ft)
290 Dwelling Units 156 0.140 0.14 46.66%
3100 Retail SF 100 0.001 0.14 46.98%
9750 Warehouse 25 0.001 0.14 47.24%
5700 Office 200 0.004 0.15 48.41%
390 Dwelling Units 156 0.188 0.33 111.17% Above Pipe
Capacity
4800 Retail SF 100 0.001 0.33 111.66% Above Pipe
Capacity
*MISC ~130770 N/A N/A 0.25 0.73 110.58% Above Pipe
Capacity
RESTAURANT 1000 0.046 0.78 117.61%
Above Pipe
Capacity
10 0.0020 0.49 N/A N/A N/A 0.78 158.41% Above Pipe
Capacity
12 0.0016 0.72 6500 E PCH part 2 Upcoming project 300 Dwelling Units 156 0.145 0.92 127.92% Above Pipe Capacity
12 0.0026 0.92 N/A N/A N/A 1.22 132.72% Above Pipe
Capacity
Segment
Pipe Pipe Capacity
(<12" 50%,
>12" 75%)
(cfs)
Calculated
flows per
LACSD
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH 10) 10 0.0036 0.66
Upcoming project 300 156 0.145 0.48

BUILDING SIZE
Below Pipe
Capacity
Below Pipe
Capacity
Above Pipe
Capacity
Address
6700 E PCH

BUILDING
TYPE
LACSD
FACTOR (gpd)
6701 E PCH
6615 E PCH
6500 E PCH part 1

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS (cfs)

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS/

CAPACITY
X100(%)

COMMENTS
Upcoming project
15000
N/A
N/A
159.94%
PIPE 3 (MH 10 - MH 11)
PIPE 1 (MH 31 - MH 30) 8 0.0024 0.3
Upcoming project
Dwelling Units
PIPE 5 (MH 39 - PUMP STATION)

MXD USE PROJECT
PIPE 4 (MH 11 - MH 39)
Size
(in.)
Slope
(ft/ft)
290 Dwelling Units 156 0.140 0.14 21.21%
3100 Retail SF 100 0.001 0.14 21.36%
9750 Warehouse 25 0.001 0.14 21.47%
5700 Office 200 0.004 0.15 22.01%
390 Dwelling Units 156 0.188 0.33 50.53% Below Pipe
Capacity
4800 Retail SF 100 0.001 0.33 50.76% Below Pipe
Capacity
*MISC ~130770 N/A N/A 0.25 0.73 83.89% Below Pipe
Capacity
RESTAURANT 1000 0.046 0.78 89.22%
Below Pipe
Capacity
12 0.0024 0.87 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.78 89.22% Below Pipe
Capacity
15 0.0020 2.63 6500 E PCH part 2 Upcoming project 300 Dwelling Units 156 0.145 0.92 35.02% Below Pipe Capacity
15 0.0026 2.63 N/A N/A N/A 1.22 46.43% Below Pipe
Capacity
15000
PIPE 3 (MH 10 - MH 11) N/A
PIPE 4 (MH 11 - MH 39)
PIPE 5 (MH 39 - PUMP STATION) N/A
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH 10) 12 0.0024 0.87
156 0.145 0.48 72.70%
Below Pipe
Capacity
Upcoming project
6500 E PCH part 1 Upcoming project 300 Dwelling Units
MXD USE PROJECT Below Pipe
Capacity
6701 E PCH Upcoming project Below Pipe
Capacity
PIPE 1 (MH 31 - MH 30) 10 0.0036 0.66
6700 E PCH
6615 E PCH
Segment
Pipe Pipe Capacity
(<12" 50%,
>12" 75%)
(cfs)
Address BUILDING
TYPE BUILDING SIZE LACSD FACTOR (gpd)
Calculated
flows per
LACSD

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS (cfs)

CUMULATIVE
FLOWS/

CAPACITY
X100(%)

COMMENTS
There are upcoming projects(6500 E PCH, 6615 E PCH & 6701 E PCH) in the vicinity of the proposed project site (6700 E PCH) which would increase the flow in the existing system marginally. The conditions on the mains are shown in the tables below TABLE 3: Proposed Site (6700 E PCH) with upcoming projects(6500 E PCH, 6615 E PCH & 6701 E PCH): Existing Sewer Line condition exhibit N o t e : a l l s e w e r c a p a c i t i e s a r e c a l c u l a t e d a t ½ f u l l d e p t h c a p a c i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s f o r l i n e s l e s s t h a n 1 5 ” a n d ¾ f u l l f o r g r e a t e r t h a n 1 5 ” a n d m o r e
TABLE 4: Proposed Site (6700 E PCH) with upcoming projects(6500 E PCH, 6615 E PCH & 6701 E PCH): Proposed Sewer Line exhibit
N o t e : a l l s e w e r c a p a c i t i e s a r e c a l c u l a t e d a t ½ f u l l d e p t h c a p a c i t y o f t h e e x i s t i n g c o n d i t i o n s f o r l i n e s l e s s t h a n 1 5 ” a n d ¾ f u l l f o r g r e a t e r t h a n 1 5 ” a n d m o r e

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 5 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m
6 C O N C L U S I O N
Based on the analysis presented above the existing 8” sewer main in Marina Dr has the adequate capacity for the proposed development (6700 E PCH) and does not need to be upsized.

If the flow conditions for the other projects(6500 E PCH, 6615 E PCH, 6701 E PCH) are considered the entire sewer line till the pump station would need to be upsized to accommodate the increased flows from the new proposed developments

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 6 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX A

SEWER STUDY MAP AND EXHIBIT

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
X
!e
!e
zP
!(i
S08
8'' VCP 0
B-1982
PVT
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
10'' VCP
0 B-1982
LBWD
10'' CWP B-1982 LBWD
8'' VCP 0 C-3473A PVT
15'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
8''
VCP SC-0054
LBWD
15'' VCP 0
B-888
LBWD
8'' VCP 0
8 B-1982 PVT '' VCP
0 B-1982
PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
6'' V
CP 0
C-3473A
PV
T
8'' VCP 0
B-1982 PVT
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
6'' V
CP 0
C-3473A
PV
T
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
10'' VCP 0 C-3473A PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0
B-1982
LBWD
10'' VCP
B-1982
LBWD
15'' VCP 0
B-890A
LBWD
6'
V
'
CP
0 C-3473A PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
12'' VCP 0
B-1982 LBWD
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
10'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
8'' VCP 0
B-1982
LBWD
10'' VCP
0 3-P-26
CSDLAC
8'' VCP 0
B-2042A
LBWD
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
10'' VCP 0
B-890A
LBWD
10'' VCP 0
B-1982
LBWD
12'' VCP 0
B-1982 LBWD
12'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
041
028
010
015
001
027
018
006
008
033
009
009
034
016
012
028
026
003
032 011
017
035
039
021
040
011
023
019
031
012
020
022
010
030
038
029
001
047
001
005
004
001
003
008 006
007
002
026
S06
S05
S04
T06
T05
T04
MARINA
DR

STUDEBAKER
RD
MARINA

PACIFICA DR

SHOPKEEPER RD

E PACIFIC COAST HWY

MARINA DR
2ND ST

MARINA DR
Disclaimer: This map and/or data are not an official record LBWD. It is compiled from data furnished by private contractors and other sources. Locations, sizes of geographic feature and facilities shown are based on these sources. This information is furnished strictly as a convenience. LBWD does not assume any responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. ± 0 65 130 260 390 Feet
1 inch = 167 feet
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
X
D
!e
!e
zP
zP
S09
S08
8''
VCP 0
B-1982 PVT
8'' VC
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
PV
T
10'' VCP
0 B-1982
LBWD
10'' CWP
B-1982 LBWD
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
15'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
8'' C
PI
0 B
-
1 982
LBWD
8'' VCP
SC-0054
LBWD
15'' VCP 0
B-888 LBWD
6'' VCP
B-888
LBWD
6'' VCP
B-888
LBWD
8'' VCP 0
B-1982
PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
6'
V
'
CP 0
C 3-
473A
PVT
6'' V
C
P
0 C
-
3 4
7 3A
P
VT
8'' VCP 0 C-3471A PVT
6'' VCP
0 C-3473A
PVT
8''
VCP
0 B-1982
PVT
10'' VCP 0
3-P-26
CSDLAC
6'' VCP
0 C-3473A
PVT
1 0'' V
C
P
B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
15'' VCP
0 B-890A
LBWD
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
C
6'' VCP 0
-3473A PVT
12'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
6'' VC
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
PVT
10'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
1 0'' V
C
P
0 3
-
P
-
2 6
C
S
D
L
A
C
P 0 3-P-26 CSDLAC
8''
VCP
0 B-1982
LBWD
8'' V
C
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
P
VT
8'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
8''
VCP
0 B-2042A LBWD
1 0'' V
C
P
0 B
-
8 9
0 A
L
B
W
D
1 0'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
1 2'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
10'' VCP 0 C-3473A PVT
1 2'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
S07
S06
S05
S04
T05
T04
MARINA

PACIFICA DR
ST
U
D
E
BA
KE
R
R
D
2ND
ST

E PACIFIC COAST HWY

MARINA DR
S
A
N
G
A
B
RIE
L
RIV
E
R
F
C

SHOPKEEPER RD

MARINA DR
0 X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
X
D
!e
!e
zP
zP
S09
S08
8''
VCP 0
B-1982 PVT
8'' VC
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
PV
T
10'' VCP
0 B-1982
LBWD
10'' CWP
B-1982 LBWD
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
15'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
8'' C
PI
0 B
-
1 982
LBWD
8'' VCP
SC-0054
LBWD
15'' VCP 0
B-888 LBWD
6'' VCP
B-888
LBWD
6'' VCP
B-888
LBWD
8'' VCP 0
B-1982
PVT
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
6'
V
'
CP 0
C 3-
473A
PVT
6'' V
C
P
0 C
-
3 4
7 3A
P
VT
8'' VCP 0 C-3471A PVT
6'' VCP
0 C-3473A
PVT
8''
VCP
0 B-1982
PVT
10'' VCP 0
3-P-26
CSDLAC
6'' VCP
0 C-3473A
PVT
1 0'' V
C
P
B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
15'' VCP
0 B-890A
LBWD
6'' VCP 0
C-3473A
PVT
8'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
C
6'' VCP 0
-3473A PVT
12'' VCP 0 B-1982 LBWD
6'' VC
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
PVT
10'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
'' VCP 0
C-3473A PVT
1 0'' V
C
P
0 3
-
P
-
2 6
C
S
D
L
A
C
P 0 3-P-26 CSDLAC
8''
VCP
0 B-1982
LBWD
8'' V
C
P
0 C
-
34 7
3 A
P
VT
8'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
8''
VCP
0 B-2042A LBWD
1 0'' V
C
P
0 B
-
8 9
0 A
L
B
W
D
1 0'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
1 2'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
10'' VCP 0 C-3473A PVT
1 2'' V
C
P
0 B
-
1 9
8 2
L
B
W
D
S07
S06
S05
S04
T05
T04
MARINA

PACIFICA DR
ST
U
D
E
BA
KE
R
R
D
2ND
ST

E PACIFIC COAST HWY

MARINA DR
S
A
N
G
A
B
RIE
L
RIV
E
R
F
C

SHOPKEEPER RD

PACIFICA DR
ST
U
D
E
BA
KE
R
R
D
2ND
ST

E PACIFIC COAST HWY

MARINA DR
S
A
N
G
A
B
RIE
L
RIV
E
R
F
C

SHOPKEEPER RD

MARINA DR
0 S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 7 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX B
US3 DATA
2022.07 Marina MH 11
MH at ~6550 Pacific Coast Hwy
MH in NB lane, at alley, west of
address
X
Install Date: 7/26/2022
Access: System Type:

Sanitary Storm
Map
Technology
Flow Meter
Meter Depth: 128.3"
MH Coordinates: 33.754731, -118.110026
Moderate open channel hydraulics with
turbulence due to lateral inflow & debris in trough
Avg Velocity Avg Measured Level Multiplier

1.2 fps 2.1" 1.0
Gas
O2 H2S CO LEL

20.9 0 0 0
Notes
Inlets from SW and SE; monitored the
downstream line to get total flow.

Traffic Safety
Used arrow board, cones & signs in accord
w/site-specific CATTCH requirements.

Land Use
Residential Commercial Industrial Trunk
X
Manhole Depth
12"
147"
Round
12"/12"
Fair
Brick
None observed
Passed

0.4 2-D

18.7"

6.7"
Downstream
Flow Heading
Sensor Direction
Sensor Dist. to Crown
Sensor Offset
Velocity Profile Data
Velocity Profile Taken
Silt
Manhole Material
Pipe Condition
Pipe Shape
Inner Pipe Size (In/Out)
Monitored Pipe Size
Holland Construction
Long Beach, CA 90803
MH # 011
Site Report
Confidential Proprietary Information
8/17/2022
Sewer Plan
Northwest
2022.07 Marina MH 11
MH at ~6550 Pacific Coast Hwy
Long Beach, CA 90803
Meter Site Document
Manhole Before Install
Installed
Downstream
Site
Installation Process
Pipe Size
Temporary Flow Study
Holland Construction
2022.07 Marina MH 11
Utility Systems, Science and Software
Santa Ana, CA 92705
601 N. Parkcenter Dr, Suite 209
Meter Start Date From 7/26/2022
Meter Stop Date To 8/10/2022
Velocity (fps) Level (in) Flow (mgd)
Average 1.235 2.191 0.082
Maximum 2.140 4.440 0.231
Minimum 0.680 1.300 0.022
Pipe Size 12.000
Estimated Capacity (mgd) Not Calculated
Capacity Used Not Calculated
Sensor Type Hach - Flodar
El Cajon, CA 92021
9314 Bond Av, Suite A
2022.07 2nd St MH 39
MH at ~6204 Marina Dr
MH in middle WB lane, east of address X
Install Date: 7/26/2022
Access: System Type:

Sanitary Storm
Map
Technology
Flow Meter
Meter Depth: 163.5"
MH Coordinates: 33.757705, -118.112979
Slow to moderate open channel hydraulics with
turbulence due to trough condition
Avg Velocity Avg Measured Level Multiplier

0.8 fps 3.8" 1.0
Gas
O2 H2S CO LEL

20.9 0 0 0
Notes
No laterals; monitored the upstream line as it
provided the best hydraulics during inspection.

Traffic Safety
Used arrow board, cones & signs in accord
w/site-specific CATTCH requirements.

Land Use
Residential Commercial Industrial Trunk
X
Manhole Depth
12"
184"
Round
12"/12"
Good
Brick
None observed
Passed

0.4 2-D

20.5"

8.5"
Upstream
Flow Heading
Sensor Direction
Sensor Dist. to Crown
Sensor Offset
Velocity Profile Data
Velocity Profile Taken
Silt
Manhole Material
Pipe Condition
Pipe Shape
Inner Pipe Size (In/Out)
Monitored Pipe Size
Holland Construction
Long Beach, CA 90803
MH # 039
Site Report
Confidential Proprietary Information
8/17/2022
Sewer Plan
Northwest
2022.07 2nd St MH 39
MH at ~6204 Marina Dr
Long Beach, CA 90803
Meter Site Document
Manhole Before Install
Installed
Site
Installation Process
Upstream Pipe Size
Temporary Flow Study
Holland Construction
2022.07 2nd St MH 39
Utility Systems, Science and Software
Santa Ana, CA 92705
601 N. Parkcenter Dr, Suite 209
Meter Start Date From 7/26/2022
Meter Stop Date To 8/10/2022
Velocity (fps) Level (in) Flow (mgd)
Average 0.837 3.885 0.123
Maximum 1.230 5.570 0.222
Minimum 0.250 2.970 0.043
Pipe Size 12.000
Estimated Capacity (mgd) Not Calculated
Capacity Used Not Calculated
Sensor Type Hach - Flodar
El Cajon, CA 92021
9314 Bond Av, Suite A
2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
Methods & Procedures & Equipment
Methods and Procedures
Utility Systems Science & Software provided Holland Construction with an off the shelf, nonproprietary flow monitoring solution that included two state of the art Hach Flo-Dar® AV Sensor systems. The project course of action is listed below. The US3 team:
 Assessed permitting and traffic control at the sites on Pacific Coast Hwy and Marina Dr in Long Beach, CA.
 Prepared the traffic control plans and obtained a City Encroachment Permit.  Coordinated with the LBWD Inspector for installation and removal of equipment.  Installed and removed traffic control in accord with site-specific California Temporary Traffic Control Handbook (CATTCH) requirements for both the installation and removal of equipment.
 Validated the sites for suitability for sewer flow monitoring for the 6700 Pacific Coast Hwy Project.
o Marina manhole (MH) 11 had pipes entering from the southeast and the southwest with moderate open channel hydraulics and turbulence due to lateral inflow as well as poor trough conditions and debris in the trough. o 2nd St MH 39 had no laterals with slow to moderate open channel hydraulics and turbulence due to a trough obstruction.
 Installed and calibrated the flow monitoring equipment at the sites per manufacturer recommendations on 7/26/2022.
o Follow-up on the installations confirmed equipment was reading properly. o Collected 15-minute interval depth and velocity data points over the entire monitoring period.
 Removed the equipment on 8/10/2022 and validated the data. o All of the equipment went through diagnostic testing before and after the study with less than a 1% deviation between manual and meter level readings and less than a 5% deviation between manual and meter velocity readings. o Equipment calibration was verified in accordance with manufacturer specifications.
 Prepared the data reports.
o The table below contains a summary of the average (Avg) and maximum (Max) velocities (Vel) and levels (Lev) collected during this study as well as the calculated flow rates (Flow) and depth versus diameter ratios (d/D). 2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
MH
Pipe
Size
(in)
Avg
Vel
(fps)
Max
Vel
(fps)
Avg
Lev
(in)
Max
Lev
(in)
Avg
Flow
(gpm)
Max
Flow
(gpm)
Avg
d/D
Max
d/D
11 12 1.23 2.14 2.18 4.44 56.14 160.68 0.18 0.37
39 12 0.83 1.23 3.83 5.57 85.06 154.37 0.32 0.46
Equipment
Figure above: Web-Enabled Flo-Dar® AV Sensor, Radar-Based Velocity/Area Flow Meter 2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
FloDar® AV Sensor Specifications:
 Enclosure
o IP68 Waterproof rating, Polystyrene
 Dimensions
o 160.5 W x 432.2 L x 297 D mm (6.32 x 16.66 x 11.7 in.), o With SVS, D = 387 mm (15.2 in.)
 Weight
o 4.8 kg (10.5 lbs.)
 Operating Temperature
o -10 to 50°C (14 to 122°F)
 Storage Temperature
o -40 to 60°C (-40 to 140°F)
 Power Requirements
o Supplied by FL900 Flow Logger, Flo-Logger, or Flo-Station  Interconnecting Cable
o Disconnect available at both sensor and logger or Flo-Station o Polyurethane, 0.400 (±0.015) in. diameter; IP68
o Standard length 9 m (30 ft), maximum 305 m (1000 ft)
 Cables – available in two styles:
o connectors at both ends
o connector from sensor with open leads to desiccant hub, desiccant hub with connector to logger. A potting/sealant kit will be included. This can be used to run the cable through conduit.
 Certification
o Certified to: FCC Part 15.245: FCC ID: VIC-FLODAR24
o Industry Canada Spec. RSS210. v7: IC No.: 6149A-FLODAR24

SURCHARGE DEPTH MEASUREMENT
o Auto zero function maintains zero error below 0.5 cm (0.2 in.)  Method
o Piezo-resistive pressure transducer with stainless steel diaphragm  Range
o 3.5 m (138 in.), overpressure rating 2.5 x full scale

VELOCITY MEASUREMENT
 Method
o Radar
 Range
o 0.23 to 6.10 m/s (0.75 to 20 ft/s)
2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
 Frequency Range
o 24.075 to 24.175 GHz, 15.2 mW (max.)
 Accuracy
o ±0.5%; ±0.03 m/s (±0.1 ft/s)

DEPTH MEASUREMENT
 Method
o Ultrasonic
 Standard Operating Range from Flo-Dar® Housing to Liquid o 0 to 152.4 cm (0 to 60 in.)
 Optional Extended Level Operating Range from Transducer Face to Liquid o 0 to 6.1 m (0 to 20 ft.) with 43.18 cm (17 in.) dead band, temperature compensated.  Accuracy
o ±1%; ±0.25 cm (±0.1 in.)

FLOW MEASUREMENT
 Method
o Based on Continuity Equation
 Accuracy
o ±5% of reading typical where flow is in a channel with uniform flow conditions and is not surcharged, ±1% full scale max.

SURCHARGE CONDITIONS DEPTH/VELOCITY DEPTH (Std with Flo-Dar® Sensor)  Surcharge depth supplied by Flo-Dar® sensor.

VELOCITY (Optional Surcharge Velocity Sensor)
 Method
o Electromagnetic
 Range
o ±4.8 m/s (±16 ft/s)
 Accuracy
o ±0.15 ft/s or 4% of reading, whichever is greater.
 Zero Stability
o ±0.05 ft/s
The Flo-Dar® Open Channel Flow Meters provide an innovative approach to open channel flow monitoring. Combining digital Doppler radar velocity sensing with ultrasonic pulse echo level sensing Flo-Dar® provides accurate open channel flow monitoring without the fouling problems associated with submerged sensors.
2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
Perfect Solution for Difficult Flow Conditions:
 Flows with High Solids Content
 High Temperature Flows
 Caustic Flows
 Large Man-Made Channel
 High Velocities
 Shallow Flows
Benefits:

1. Personnel have no contact with the flow during installation.

2. Maintenance caused by sensor fouling is eliminated

3. Field Replaceable/Interchangeable Sensors and Monitors 2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
How It Works
Flo-Dar® transmits a digital Doppler radar beam that interacts with the fluid and reflects back signals at a different frequency than that which was transmitted. These reflected signals are compared with the transmitted frequency. The resulting frequency shift provides an accurate measure of the velocity and the direction of the flow. Level is detected by ultrasonic pulse echo. Flow is then calculated based on the Continuity Equation:

Q = V x A, Where Q = Flow, V = Average Velocity and A = Area Accurate Flow Measurements
Flo-Dar® provides the user with highly accurate flow measurements under a wide range of flows and site conditions. By measuring the velocity of the fluid from above, Flo-Dar® eliminates accuracy problems inherent with submerged sensors including sensor disturbances, high solids content and distribution of reflectors.

Figure above: US3 utilizes exclusively Hach March-McBirney Flo-Dar® Meters 2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
US3 Company Information
US3 is a California Corporation Federal ID No. 33-0729605 and qualifies as a Minority Business Enterprise. US3 has certified as an MBE with the California Public Utility Commission’s authorized clearinghouse, Verification Number: 97ES0008.

US3
is a specialty service company for the Water & Waste Water industry, providing monitoring and control for Utilities since 1996. US3 is in the forefront of this industry by taking the proven technological approaches developed in other high-tech industries and applying them to protect one of our most precious natural resources - our water.

US3 engineers and technical personnel have applied advanced instrumentation system technology to water/wastewater open channel flow monitoring, pipeline evaluation, engineering, and data analysis, all coupled to the power of the Internet. This unique integrated systems approach allows the company to bring greater insight and intelligence to gathering information about water/wastewater system performance of our clients, and in turn, to support the fulfillment of their commitments to manage and cost effectively design, operate, and maintain these systems.

Moreover, US3 supports Municipalities, Consulting Engineering firms and other water/waste water systems integrators by providing temporary technical services for engineering, software programming and technical site maintenance and calibration site support work, primarily in the Water and Waste Water industries.

Figure at right: All US3
technicians are certified
for Confined Space Entry.
2022.07.26-08.10 Temporary Sewer Flow Monitoring Holland Construction, Inc.

Utility Systems Science & Software
Key Personnel Assigned
US3 provided the necessary resources to fully implement this project. Primary in support of this effort were the following personnel:

Mr. Mark Serres: Mr. Serres is a degreed electrical engineer with over 25 years of experience with fresh/wastewater systems, project management, and systems integration in relation to complex industrial systems. This includes experience in industrial automation and water/wastewater industries. Mr. Serres is responsible for assuring client satisfaction and marshalling the required resources to meet the project requirements.

Mr. Thomas Williams: Mr. Williams is an Engineering Manager with over 20 years of experience in complex systems development for wastewater monitoring. This experience includes hydraulic compatibility, instrumentation, communications and analysis. Mr. Williams is responsible for assuring that the required equipment is designed and calibrated to meet the project requirements.

Darlene Szczublewski, PE: Mrs. Szczublewski is a licensed Civil Engineer in multiple states. She has over 15 years of engineering experience with stormwater/wastewater related projects. She assisted in the completion of several Sanitary Sewer Evaluation Surveys and Capacity Analysis projects to meet Consent Decrees as well as completing numerous Infiltration and Inflow (I&I) studies for other clients. Mrs. Szczublewski has developed numerous flow data analysis techniques to present a clear informative picture of flow in a monitored system. Her work also includes the development of training programs for clients describing I&I and capacity analysis methodologies. Mrs. Szczublewski is responsible for analyzing the data as well as the data collection process and assuring that the reports meet the project requirements.

Name, title, address and telephone number of persons to contact regarding this US3 project.

Darlene Szczublewski, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
[email protected]
9314 Bond Av, Suite A
El Cajon, CA 92021
619-546-4281 (work)
619-246-5304 (cell)
Tom Williams
Engineering Manager
[email protected]
9314 Bond Av, Suite A
El Cajon, CA 92021
619-546-4281 (work)
619-398-7799 (cell)

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 8 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX C

AS BUILT PLANS

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 9 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX D

FLOW CALCULATIONS (FLOWMASTER)
Project Description
Friction Method Manning Formula
Solve For Discharge
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.00240 ft/ft
Normal Depth 4.00 in
Diameter 8.00 in
Results
Discharge 0.30 ft³/s
Flow Area 0.17 ft²
Wetted Perimeter 1.05 ft
Hydraulic Radius 2.00 in
Top Width 0.67 ft
Critical Depth 0.25 ft
Percent Full 50.0 %
Critical Slope 0.00653 ft/ft
Velocity 1.70 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.04 ft
Specific Energy 0.38 ft
Froude Number 0.58
Maximum Discharge 0.64 ft³/s
Discharge Full 0.59 ft³/s
Slope Full 0.00060 ft/ft
Flow Type SubCritical
GVF Input Data
Downstream Depth 0.00 in
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 in
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Normal Depth Over Rise 50.00 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
PIPE 1 (MH31 - MH30)
8/31/2022 9:43:16 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 1 of GVF Output Data
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal Depth 4.00 in
Critical Depth 0.25 ft
Channel Slope 0.00240 ft/ft
Critical Slope 0.00653 ft/ft
PIPE 1 (MH31 - MH30)
8/31/2022 9:43:16 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 2 of Project Description
Friction Method Manning Formula
Solve For Discharge
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.00360 ft/ft
Normal Depth 5.00 in
Diameter 10.00 in
Results
Discharge 0.66 ft³/s
Flow Area 0.27 ft²
Wetted Perimeter 1.31 ft
Hydraulic Radius 2.50 in
Top Width 0.83 ft
Critical Depth 0.36 ft
Percent Full 50.0 %
Critical Slope 0.00621 ft/ft
Velocity 2.41 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.09 ft
Specific Energy 0.51 ft
Froude Number 0.74
Maximum Discharge 1.41 ft³/s
Discharge Full 1.31 ft³/s
Slope Full 0.00090 ft/ft
Flow Type SubCritical
GVF Input Data
Downstream Depth 0.00 in
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 in
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Normal Depth Over Rise 50.00 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH10)
8/31/2022 9:44:19 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 1 of GVF Output Data
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal Depth 5.00 in
Critical Depth 0.36 ft
Channel Slope 0.00360 ft/ft
Critical Slope 0.00621 ft/ft
PIPE 2 (MH 30 - MH10)
8/31/2022 9:44:19 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 2 of Project Description
Friction Method Manning Formula
Solve For Discharge
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.00197 ft/ft
Normal Depth 5.00 in
Diameter 10.00 in
Results
Discharge 0.49 ft³/s
Flow Area 0.27 ft²
Wetted Perimeter 1.31 ft
Hydraulic Radius 2.50 in
Top Width 0.83 ft
Critical Depth 0.30 ft
Percent Full 50.0 %
Critical Slope 0.00605 ft/ft
Velocity 1.78 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.05 ft
Specific Energy 0.47 ft
Froude Number 0.55
Maximum Discharge 1.05 ft³/s
Discharge Full 0.97 ft³/s
Slope Full 0.00049 ft/ft
Flow Type SubCritical
GVF Input Data
Downstream Depth 0.00 in
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 in
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Normal Depth Over Rise 50.00 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
PIPE 3 (MH10 - MH 11)
8/31/2022 9:45:26 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 1 of GVF Output Data
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal Depth 5.00 in
Critical Depth 0.30 ft
Channel Slope 0.00197 ft/ft
Critical Slope 0.00605 ft/ft
PIPE 3 (MH10 - MH 11)
8/31/2022 9:45:26 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 2 of Project Description
Friction Method Manning Formula
Solve For Discharge
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.00163 ft/ft
Normal Depth 6.00 in
Diameter 12.00 in
Results
Discharge 0.72 ft³/s
Flow Area 0.39 ft²
Wetted Perimeter 1.57 ft
Hydraulic Radius 3.00 in
Top Width 1.00 ft
Critical Depth 0.35 ft
Percent Full 50.0 %
Critical Slope 0.00565 ft/ft
Velocity 1.83 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.05 ft
Specific Energy 0.55 ft
Froude Number 0.52
Maximum Discharge 1.55 ft³/s
Discharge Full 1.44 ft³/s
Slope Full 0.00041 ft/ft
Flow Type SubCritical
GVF Input Data
Downstream Depth 0.00 in
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 in
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Normal Depth Over Rise 50.00 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
PIPE 4 (MH11 - MH39)
8/31/2022 9:46:05 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 1 of GVF Output Data
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal Depth 6.00 in
Critical Depth 0.35 ft
Channel Slope 0.00163 ft/ft
Critical Slope 0.00565 ft/ft
PIPE 4 (MH11 - MH39)
8/31/2022 9:46:05 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 2 of Project Description
Friction Method Manning Formula
Solve For Discharge
Input Data
Roughness Coefficient 0.013
Channel Slope 0.00264 ft/ft
Normal Depth 6.00 in
Diameter 12.00 in
Results
Discharge 0.92 ft³/s
Flow Area 0.39 ft²
Wetted Perimeter 1.57 ft
Hydraulic Radius 3.00 in
Top Width 1.00 ft
Critical Depth 0.40 ft
Percent Full 50.0 %
Critical Slope 0.00576 ft/ft
Velocity 2.33 ft/s
Velocity Head 0.08 ft
Specific Energy 0.58 ft
Froude Number 0.66
Maximum Discharge 1.97 ft³/s
Discharge Full 1.83 ft³/s
Slope Full 0.00066 ft/ft
Flow Type SubCritical
GVF Input Data
Downstream Depth 0.00 in
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
GVF Output Data
Upstream Depth 0.00 in
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Normal Depth Over Rise 50.00 %
Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
PIPE 5 (MH39 - PUMP STATION)
8/31/2022 9:46:46 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 1 of GVF Output Data
Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s
Normal Depth 6.00 in
Critical Depth 0.40 ft
Channel Slope 0.00264 ft/ft
Critical Slope 0.00576 ft/ft
PIPE 5 (MH39 - PUMP STATION)
8/31/2022 9:46:46 AM
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Cen Bentley FlowMaster V8i (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.0 ter 3] 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 2 Page 2 of

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 1 0 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX E

LACSD OCCUPANCY LOADING RATES AND DESIGN CRITERIA
TABLE 1

LOADINGS FOR EACH CLASS OF LAND USE

DESCRIPTION UNIT OF MEASURE
FLOW
(Gallons
Per Day)
COD
(Pounds
Per Day)

SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
(Pounds
Per Day)

R E S I D E N T I A L
Single Family Home Parcel 260 1.22 0.59
Duplex Parcel 312 1.46 0.70
Triplex Parcel 468 2.19 1.05
Fourplex Parcel 624 2.92 1.40
Condominiums Parcel 195 0.92 0.44
Single Family Home Parcel 156 0.73 0.35
(reduced rate)
Five Units or More No. of Dwlg. Units 156 0.73 0.35
Mobile Home Parks No. of Spaces 156 0.73 0.35

C O M M E R C I A L
Hotel/Motel/Rooming House Room 125 0.54 0.28
Store 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Supermarket 1000 ft2
150 2.00 1.00
Shopping Center 1000 ft2
325 3.00 1.17
Regional Mall 1000 ft2
150 2.10 0.77
Office Building 1000 ft2
200 0.86 0.45
Professional Building 1000 ft2
300 1.29 0.68
Restaurant 1000 ft2
1,000 16.68 5.00
Indoor Theatre 1000 ft2
125 0.54 0.28
Car Wash
Tunnel - No Recycling 1000 ft2
3,700 15.86 8.33
Tunnel - Recycling 1000 ft2
2,700 11.74 6.16
Wand 1000 ft2
700 3.00 1.58
Financial Institution 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Service Shop 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Animal Kennels 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Service Station 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Auto Sales/Repair 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Wholesale Outlet 1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Nursery/Greenhouse 1000 ft2
25 0.11 0.06
Manufacturing 1000 ft2
200 1.86 0.70
Dry Manufacturing 1000 ft2
25 0.23 0.09
Lumber Yard 1000 ft2
25 0.23 0.09
Warehousing 1000 ft2
25 0.23 0.09
Open Storage 1000 ft2
25 0.23 0.09
Drive-in Theatre 1000 ft2
20 0.09 0.05
TABLE 1
(continued)

LOADINGS FOR EACH CLASS OF LAND USE

DESCRIPTION UNIT OF MEASURE
FLOW
(Gallons
Per Day)
COD
(Pounds
Per Day)

SUSPENDED
SOLIDS
(Pounds
Per Day)

C O M M E R C I A L
Night Club 1000 ft2 350 1.50 0.79
Bowling/Skating 1000 ft2
150 1.76 0.55
Club 1000 ft2
125 0.54 0.27
Auditorium, Amusement 1000 ft2
350 1.50 0.79
Golf Course, Camp, and
Park (Structures and
Improvements
1000 ft2
100 0.43 0.23
Recreational Vehicle Park No. of Spaces 55 0.34 0.14
Convalescent Home Bed 125 0.54 0.28
Laundry 1000 ft2
3,825 16.40 8.61
Mortuary/Cemetery 1000 ft2
100 1.33 0.67
Health Spa, Gymnasium
With Showers 1000 ft2
600 2.58 1.35
Without Showers 1000 ft2
300 1.29 0.68
Convention Center,
Fairground, Racetrack, Average Daily 10 0.04 0.02
Sports Stadium/Arena Attendance

I N S T I T U T I O N A L
College/University Student 20 0.09 0.05
Private School 1000 ft2
200 0.86 0.45
Church 1000 ft2
50 0.21 0.11

Page 1 of 6 ends

3.0 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
All sanitary sewers shall be designed in accordance with these Design Standards, LBWD Rules and Regulations, and to accepted engineering principles. In all newly developed areas and/or in all existing areas where new sanitary sewers are required, the design shall include the provisions that the sewer system size and capacity can adequately accommodate the ultimate anticipated conditions.

3.01 SYSTEM FLOW RATE CRITERIA
Residential Use
Since the quantity of domestic sewage is a function of the population and of water consumption, sanitary sewer mains and laterals shall be designed for the saturation density of population expected in the areas served. The sanitary sewer system shall be designed for tributary areas, land use and population estimates based on the most recent General Plan and Sewer Master Plan.

All sanitary sewer mains shall be designed based on the peaked average daily flow. Design flow rates shall be in accordance with the following:

Qp = Peaked Average Daily Flow
Qp = Average daily flow x Per Capita Factor x Number of Households x Peak Factor Average daily flow: 95 gpcd (gallons per capita per day) Per Capita Factor: 2.8 persons/household (from U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census) Peak factor: 2.0
Commercial and Industrial Use
Commercial and industrial dischargers will be investigated on a case‐by‐case basis.

3.02 SANITARY SEWER PIPELINE SIZING and Slope
Pipeline sizing for gravity pipelines shall be determined on the basis of the design Peak Average Daily Flow Rate (Qp) and incorporating the following criteria:

Pipe Diameter Manning’s Roughness Coefficient d/D Maximum 8” to 12” 0.013 0.50
15” or greater 0.013 0.75
A minimum pipe size of 8 inches shall be used for all public sewers, collection sewers, and private sewers within streets.

Required velocities at design flow (Qp) shall be as follows:

Minimum Maximum
Sanitary Sewer Pipelines 2 fps 8 fps
The maximum velocity at Qp flow allowed in any sanitary sewer pipeline is 8 fps.

Page 2 of 6 ends

Do not increase sewer sizes in flat topography to justify use of flatter grades. Under minimal flow conditions, wastewater in larger pipelines can have velocities lower than that in smaller pipelines.

Gravity sewers shall have the following minimum slopes:

Pipe Diameter (in.) Slope
8 0.0036
10 0.0030
12 0.0024
15 0.0020

Slopes shall be set to 2 decimal figures, evenly distributed by 4, where possible.

3.03 SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Flow monitoring and a sewer capacity study is required when proposed development intensifies the land use from the existing development on the site, proposed development requires a general plan amendment to a more intense use, or required by the Department. The capacity study is to ensure the sewer system can accommodate a proposed development, and if not, help identify needed improvements required for the development. The Developer is required to cover the costs associated with flow monitoring, sewer capacity study, and sewer modeling.

Flow Monitoring requirements include:

1. Flow monitoring shall be performed for seven (7) continuous days without interruption of data.

2. Data shall be taken at fifteen (15) minute intervals.

3. Location of flow meter(s) and type of flow meter shall be approved by the Department.

4. Number of flow monitoring locations will be determined by the Department, based on existing sewer system, and size and capacity of the development.

5. Raw data of the flow level (inches), flow velocity (feet per second), and flow rate (gallons per minute) in 15 minute intervals for the duration of the flow monitoring period shall be provided to the Department in Microsoft Excel file format.

6. Confined Space Entry Permit, if required prior to start of work.

7. Temporary Street Occupancy Permit prior to start of work.

8. Traffic Control may be required and must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to start of work.

Sewer Capacity Study shall include, but not limited, to the following:

1. Site description (traffic, surface condition, weather).

2. Site map showing location of flow meter manhole(s).

3. Dates of the flow monitoring period.

4. Company name, contact person, address, phone number, e‐mail address performing the study.

5. Flow meter equipment information (sensor type, calibration history).

6. Manhole inspection report (pipe size, pipe material, manhole depth, condition of channel, bench, rungs, cone, ring, and cover).

7. Diagram of manhole channel showing direction of flow and north arrow.

8. Charts showing depth of flow, flow velocity, and flow rate.

Page 3 of 6 ends

9. Site analysis for each flow meter location including, but not limited to, maximum and minimum flow level, velocity and flow rate, estimated capacity, capacity used, evidence of surcharge, hydraulic conditions.

10. Flow monitoring study shall be reviewed by a licensed civil engineer.

11. One (1) colored hard‐copy and electronic copy in .PDF format of the flow monitoring study shall be submitted to the Department for review and acceptance.

Sewer modeling shall be performed by the Department where available at the cost of the Developer.

The Department will model at least two scenarios:

1. Existing Condition – using raw flow monitoring data to identify existing deficiencies in the system

2. Existing Condition with Proposed Development – to identify additional deficiencies created by the proposed development
The cost of modeling is dependent on the scope of the proposed project and an estimate shall be provided to the Developer by LBWD. Developer will deposit the estimated amount for the proposed sewer study. The Department will input the developer’s project parameters into the Sewer Master Plan model to identify the project’s impact to the sanitary sewer system.

Development in areas with a downstream deficient sewer will be restricted. Where uses are discontinued on a property to allow for new development, new development up to the sewer generation rate of the previous use on the property will be allowed in sewer deficient areas.

The Developer may make the needed improvements to the sewer system at his/her own cost and request a reimbursement agreement to recover a portion of the costs from other developments that tie into the system and benefit from the improvements. Reimbursement agreements run a term of twenty years and are not guaranteed to be paid in full.

3.04 LOCATION:

Sanitary sewer mains shall be located in the street along the centerline wherever possible and shall not be located underneath sidewalks, along curbs and gutters, in parkways, or closer than five feet to the exterior wall of any building or foundation. Location shall not interfere with other existing utilities.

Horizontal curves are not permitted within the Department’s sanitary sewer system. Use manholes for all changes in direction of sewer mains.

Vertical curves are not permitted within the Department’s sanitary sewer system. Use straight grade from manhole to manhole. Use manholes for all changes in direction of sewer mains.

Sanitary sewer installation near potable water pipelines shall be in accordance with the California Waterworks Standards, Section 64572, Chapter 16, Title 22 of the California Administrative Code, or the Department’s criteria, whichever is most restrictive. Sanitary sewer pipelines shall be located a minimum of ten feet (outside to outside) from the potable water pipeline.

When crossing other utilities, a minimum vertical clearance of 6” shall be provided (outside to outside), unless otherwise approved by the Department and the California Department of Public Health.

3.05 SEWER LATERALS

Page 4 of 6 ends

Sewer laterals shall have a minimum diameter of 6”. Laterals shall have a minimum slope of 2% from the sanitary sewer main to the property line and shall have a minimum cover of 5 feet at the property line.

Connection:
6 inch to main line (8 inch or larger): tee or wye
8 inch to main line (8 inch or larger): manhole
House connections shall be connected at a 90‐degree angle to the sanitary sewer main. The wye‐ connection shall be located in the direction of flow. The minimum distance from the last lateral to an end structure shall be 10 feet.

Provide a lateral for each lot.

3.06 MATERIALS
All pipes shall be designed to withstand an H‐20 highway loading and existing sub‐surface conditions.  Vitrified clay pipe (VCP)
o Extra strength for sanitary sewer mains up to 20 feet in depth o Extra strength reinforced with concrete cradle or concrete encasement, for sanitary sewer mains more than 20 feet in depth as may be directed by the Department o Extra strength encased in concrete or placed inside of steel casing for sanitary sewer mains as may be directed by the Department under railways, freeways, major highways and such other streets as may be designated by the Department. Refer to WDS‐106 (Water Main Encasement) for details.
o Reinforced as required by the Department for sanitary sewer mains under large conduits or other structures

3.07 MANHOLES
Manholes shall be designed per applicable LBWD standard drawing.

Manholes shall be sized accordingly:

Pipe Diameter (in.) Manhole Size (in.)
8 to 27 48
> 27 60

Manholes shall be spaced at 350 foot maximum intervals. Manholes shall be placed at all of the following locations: grade breaks, changes in horizontal alignment, changes in sewer diameter, at street intersections, at sewer pipe intersections, and at the beginning of sewer runs.

Junction manholes shall be designed with the soffits of the intersecting sewer at the same elevation as the soffit of the upstream sewer.

Page 5 of 6 ends

A manhole shall be constructed at the end of construction with a 1’ and 2’ stub outs for future connection. Stub shall be plugged with brick and mortar.

In unpaved areas where there is a danger of the manhole becoming lost, set the top of cover elevation so as not to be less than 1‐foot above existing ground.

Cleanouts in a sewer lateral shall be made by inserting either a wye branch or a two‐way cleanout fitting in the line with the cleanout hub placed vertically above the flow line of the pipe. A cast iron cover shall be tightly sealed in the bell of the access or vertical outlet. Refer to WDS‐506 (Sewer Cleanout) for details.

Cleanouts shall be accessible for maintenance and shall be placed in every sewer lateral at:
 The junction with the Building Sewer at the building;  Intervals of not more than fifty feet in straight runs. Cleanouts in straight runs longer than fifty feet shall be uniformly spaced;
 The junction with the Main Line Sewer; or the junction of the House Connection and Building Sewer at the Property Line; and
 All significant changes in alignment or grade or when required by the Department.

A four inch or larger cleanout is required to receive any video inspection services from the Department.

Installation is at the property owner’s expense.

Elevation drop thru manholes:

Minimum Drop Across Manhole (ft)
Pipe Size Channel Configuration
Straight Turn Right Angle
No Change 0.1 0.1 0.2
Change Match Soffit/0.2 Match Soffit/0.2 Match Soffit/0.2

Protect sanitary sewer mains when:
 Crossing sewer main is 6” minimum above water main, or  Crossing sewer main is 12” minimum below water main.

Refer to WDS‐129 (Blanket Protection for Pipes) and WDS‐405 (Perpendicular Crossing and Parallel Construction) for details.

SEWER LATERAL ABANDONMENT

Page 6 of 6 ends

Before the use of any Sewer Lateral is discontinued, the person discontinuing the use, or some person authorized by him to do so, shall apply for, and obtain from the Department, a permit to cut and cap the Sewer. The permit is to specify the manner in which the Sewer is to be cut and capped.

EASEMENTS
When sewers cannot be located within streets, it shall be located in an approved easement.

Sewer easements shall be a minimum 20 feet in width.

Easements for public sewers shall be dedicated to the Department on a recorded map or by a separate deed with the approved easement sketch and the legal description (including closure calculations).

PERMITTING
Permits are required for all sanitary sewer work, including but not limited to the following:
 Private construction of public infrastructure
 Excavation
 Street obstruction
 Traffic control
 Other as necessary

PRIVATE SEWERS
Private on‐site sewers designed to meet the California Plumbing Code will be reviewed, permitted and inspected by Long Beach Development Services. These plans will not be reviewed by the Long Beach Water Department, but must meet all requirements of the California Plumbing Code and Long Beach Development Services. Contact Long Beach Development Services at (562) 570‐6230 for plumbing plan check requirements.

S e w e r A r e a S t u d y 3 1 9 M a i n S t ,
6 7 0 0 E P C H E l S e g u n d o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 0 2 4 5 L o n g B e a c h , C A 9 0 8 1 5 t : 2 1 3 / 2 3 9 9 7 0 0 i n f o @ l a b i b s e . c o m
P a g e 1 1 w w w . l a b i b s e . c o m

APPENDIX F

SITE PLAN
1 A203
A202
A201
A204
1 1
1 C.L. 1
1 10
2 10
2 8
8 SETBACK
4' - 0"
STU
STU
A A
MA MA
X
X
15' - 0" 35' - 0"
18' - 0" EASEMENT
10' - 0"SETBACK

PROPERTY LINE

EASTMENT LINE

PROPERTY LINE

EASTMENT LINE
LOT AREA: 113,874 SF

LOT AREA MINUS
EASEMENTS: 99,816 SF
50' - 0"
50' - 0"
PROPOSED 6 STORY MIXED-USE STRUCTURE OVER A SINGLE STORY BASEMENT

EXISTING

BUILDING
TO BE

DEMOLISHED
28' - 0"SETBACK
50' - 0"50' - 0"

SIDEWALK
21' - 3"
AT

TOP FLOOR
10' - 0"STEP
BACK
PER
SEASP

STEP BACK PER SEASP
10' - 0"AT TOP FLOOR
6' - 0"BALCONY (TYP.)
6' - 0"BALCONY (TYP.)
BALCONY (TYP.)
25' - 0"EASEMENT
3 STORY PORTION
PER SEASP TABLE 6-4
(SOUTH GATEWAY)
30' - 0"
30' - 0"
88' - 7"

VEHICULAR ACCESS
TRANS
160' - 0"
6700 PCH SITE PLAN A000 6700 PCH, LONG
BEACH, CA, 90803
05/18/2022
0' 30' 60' 120'
scale: 1" = 60'-0"

MARINA DR

SAN GABRIEL RIVER FC

PACIFIC COAST HWY
2ND ST

STUDEBAKER RD

SAN GABRIEL RIVER FC

SHOPKEEPER RD

PACIFIC

MARINA DR

COAST HWY
APNs: 7237020050, 7237020040
6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway
Carmel Partners
390 dwelling units, 4,800 SF of commercial
APN: 7242012006
6700 E. Pacific Coast Highway
Holland Partner Group
290 units, 3,100 SF of commercial
APN: 7242011013
6500 E. Pacific Coast Highway
Onni Group
Approx. 600 units with small amount of retail
APN: 7237020043
6701 E. Pacific Coast Highway
Lyon Living
5,200 SF (2-story) office building with
9,750 SF storage/warehouse,
establish 50 new oil wells & associated storage
5 4 7
3 1
9 8
6 2
T:\DeveServices\Map and Analysis Requests\A Map for 2 Parcels for Sergio Gutierrez SEASP Area Projects
250 125 0 250 500
Feet
August 2017 | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Southeast Area Specific Plan
for City of Long Beach
Prepared for:

City of Long Beach
Contact: Christopher Koontz, AICP, Advance Planning Officer Development Services Department, Planning Bureau
333 W. Ocean Boulevard, 5th Floor
Long Beach, California 90802
562.570.6288
[email protected]
Prepared by:

PlaceWorks
Contact: Nicole Morse, Esq, Associate Principal
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, California 92707
714.966.9220
[email protected]
www.placeworks.com

EXHIBIT B

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page i
Section Page

1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM............................1

1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................................................... 4

1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION .......................................................... 4 Table Page
Table 1-1 Southeast Area Specific Plan Land Use Summary ........................................................................... 3 Table 1-2 Conventional Zoning Area .................................................................................................................. 4 Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements ...................................................................... 5

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Page ii PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

August 2017 Page 1

1. Introduction

1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed to provide a vehicle to monitor mitigation measures and conditions of approval outlined in the Final Environmental Impact Report.

The MMRP has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code and City of Long Beach monitoring requirements. Section 21081.6 states:
(a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision subsection (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply:
(1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures.

Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design.
(c) Prior to the close of the public review period for a draft environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration, a responsible agency, or a public agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, shall either submit to the lead agency complete and detailed performance objectives for mitigation measures which would address the significant effects on the environment identified by the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project, or refer the lead agency to appropriate, readily available guidelines or reference documents. Any mitigation measures

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 2 ends

submitted to a lead agency by a responsible agency or an agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project shall be limited to measures which mitigate impacts to resources which are subject to the statutory authority of, and definitions applicable to, that agency. Compliance or noncompliance by a responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project with that requirement shall not limit the authority of the responsible agency or agency having jurisdiction over natural resources affected by a project, or the authority of the lead agency, to approve, condition, or deny projects as provided by this division or any other provision of law.

The MMRP will serve to document compliance with adopted/certified mitigation measures that are formulated to minimize impacts associated with future development that would be accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan.

1.2 PROJECT SUMMARY
The Project consists of a specific plan, general plan amendment, zoning ordinance amendment, and LCP amendment to shape the land use and development on 1,481 acres. The Project consists of two components:
1) the Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP; Specific Plan) covering 1,472 acres and 2) the conventional zoning area covering 9 acres. The conventional zoning area is described starting on Page 3-21 of this section.

Both of these areas constitute the “project” for purposes of CEQA, but are described separately below.

Southeast Area Specific Plan
The Southeast Area Specific Plan consists of 1,472 acres and includes 1,372 acres currently zoned “PD-1, SEADIP,” 94 acres of the San Gabriel River and Los Cerritos Channel, and 6 acres along the southeast edge of the current PD-1 boundary. This 6-acre area is the result of a boundary adjustment between Los Angeles and Orange County that was approved by the local area formation commission in 2012, but never updated in PD-1. The proposed Specific Plan would replace the 1977 Southeast Area Development Improvement Plan (PD-1).

Land use designations would include: Single Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential, Mobile Homes, Commercial-Neighborhood, Mixed Use Community Core, Mixed Use Marina, Industrial, Public, Open Space and Recreation, Coastal Habitat/Wetlands/Recreation, Channel/Marina/Waterway, Right-of-Way /Caltrans, and Dedicated Right-of-Way (not built).

Land use statistics are provided in Table 1-1. Buildout of the Specific Plan as revised under the Reduced Intensity Alternative would allow a total of 6,663 dwelling units, 2,398,547 square feet of commercial/employment uses, and 375 hotel rooms.

S O U T H E A S T A R E A M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 3
Table 1-1 Southeast Area Specific Plan Land Use Summary Existing Projection Net Increase
Dwelling Units 4,079 6,663 2,584
Population 6,486 10,594 4,108
Commercial/Employment (SF) 2,091,476 2,398,547 307,071
Employees 3,555 3,704 149
Hotel Rooms 375 375 0
Acres 1,3811 1,4722 0
Source: City of Long Beach; PlaceWorks (October 2015; March 2016).

1. The PD-1 boundary does not include portions of the San Gabriel River and the Los Cerritos Channel totaling 94 acres and 6 acres resulting from a County boundary adjustment approved by LAFCO.

2. The Project area consists of a total of 1,481 acres: 1) 1,472 acres within the proposed Specific Plan, which includes the 94 acres of waterways and 6 acres along the southeast boundary; and 2) 9 acres in the conventional zoning area that were in the PD-1 boundary but removed from the Specific Plan.

In addition to the required elements of the Specific Plan–such as, development standards, design guidelines– there are a number of project design features that have mitigating effects. Mobility improvements include enhanced roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian connectivity. SEASP Sections 7.2.2, Views, and 7.2.5, Special Edge Conditions, protect scenic views and require sensitive design adjacent to wetlands, marinas, and waterways.

SEASP Section 7.3.14, Bird-Safe Treatments, reduces impacts related to birds by addressing the interface between the wetlands (as essential bird habitat) and urban uses. It establishes criteria for lighting, landscaping, and façade treatments to minimize light pollution in natural areas and bird strikes. The proposed Specific Plan also establishes a Wetland Conservation and Monitoring Fund (SEASP Section 5.9) to preserve and restore wetlands and requires wetland buffers for development adjacent to wetlands (SEASP Section 5.10).

Conventional Zoning Area
The remaining nine acres of land in the Project area directly west of the Marina Vista Park are proposed to be extracted from the PD-1 zoning designation and converted to conventional zoning. This area would not be included in the proposed Specific Plan. Existing land uses in this area include single-family homes and a fire station. The proposed land use for this area was determined based on existing conditions and would be designated single-family residential. No new development is intended for this area, and no physical change (e.g., additional development intensity or redevelopment) is expected to occur; all existing uses within this area are expected to remain.

A conventional zoning designation (R-1-N, single family residential) was chosen to be consistent with the existing residential development. No new development is intended in this area. Given that the existing intensity of development is not expected to change, buildout projections for the nine-acre conventional zoning area assume no change in number of dwelling units or population. Buildout projections for the area are shown in Table 1-2.

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 4 ends

Table 1-2 Conventional Zoning Area
Existing Conventional Zoning/ R-Zone
Dwelling Units 39 39
Population 66 66
Public (SF) 16,693 16,693
Employees — —
Hotel Rooms — —
Acres 9 9
Notes: SF = square feet

1.3 PROJECT LOCATION
The Project area is on the southeast edge of the City of Long Beach, California, within Los Angeles County and bordering Orange County. The area encompasses 1,481 acres and consists of the area south of 7th Street, east of Bellflower Boulevard, east of the Long Beach Marine Stadium and Alamitos Bay docks, south of Colorado Street, and north and west of Long Beach’s southern boundary. The Los Cerritos Channel and San Gabriel River run through the Project area toward the Alamitos Bay and Pacific Ocean and are included as part of the Project area.

Regional access to the Project area is provided by Interstate 405 (I-405) and I-605. I-405 runs east-west, and the I-605 runs north-south near the northeastern portion of the Project area. Also, State Route 22 (SR-22) intersects with I-605 and runs east-west into the northeast portion of the Project area, and terminates as 7th Street along the Project’s northern boundary.

1.4 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION
CEQA requires that a reporting or monitoring program be adopted for the conditions of project approval that are necessary to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment (Public Resources Code 21081.6). The mitigation monitoring and reporting program is designed to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures during project implementation. For each mitigation measure recommended in the DEIR, specifications are made herein that identify the action required and the monitoring and reporting that must occur. In addition, a responsible agency is identified for verifying compliance with individual conditions of approval contained in the MMRP. To effectively track and document the status of mitigation measures, a mitigation matrix has been prepared (see Table 1-3).

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 5
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor

5.3 AIR QUALITY
AQ-1 Applicants for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall require the construction contractor to use equipment that meets the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 emissions standards for off-road diesel-powered construction equipment with more than 50 horsepower, unless it can be demonstrated to the City of Long Beach that such equipment is not available. Any emissions control device used by the contractor shall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level 4 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine, as defined by the California Air Resources Board’s regulations.

Prior to construction, the project engineer shall ensure that all demolition and grading plans clearly show the requirement for EPA Tier 4 or higher emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower. During construction, the construction contractor shall maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the construction site for verification by the City of Long Beach. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and numbers of construction equipment onsite. Equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Construction contractors shall also ensure that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board’s Rule 2449.

Prior to and during
construction
activities
Project
Applicant,
Engineer and
Construction
Contractor
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 6 ends

The City of Long Beach shall verify that these measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections.

Following all grading activities, the construction contractor shall reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering.

During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall sweep streets with SCAQMD Rule 1186–compliant,
PM10-efficient vacuum units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.

During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard on trucks
hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and shall tarp materials with a fabric cover or other cover that
achieves the same amount of protection.

During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of every three hours on the construction site and a minimum of three times per day.

During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall limit onsite vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles per hour.

Heavy construction vehicles trips shall be limited to off-peak hours.

During grounddisturbing activitiesProject Applicant
and Construction
Contractor
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 7
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
AQ-3 Applicants for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall require the construction contractor to use coatings and solvents with a volatile organic compound (VOC) content lower than required under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 (i.e., super compliant paints). The construction contractor shall also use precoated/natural-colored building materials, where feasible.

Use of low-VOC paints and spray method shall be included as a note on architectural building plans and verified by the City of Long Beach during construction.

During
construction
activities
Project Applicant
and Construction
Contractor
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
AQ-4 Prior to issuance of a building permit for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the property owner/developer shall show on the building plans that all major appliances (dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) to be provided/installed are Energy Star appliances. Installation of Energy Star appliances shall be verified by the City of Long Beach prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Property Owner/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
AQ-5 Prior to issuance of building permits for residential development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the property owner/developer shall indicate on the building plans that the following features have been incorporated into the design of the building(s).

Proper installation of these features shall be verified by the City of Long Beach prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

For multifamily dwellings, electric vehicle charging shall be provided as specified in Section A4.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and the Long
Beach Municipal Code.

Bicycle parking shall be provided as specified in Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Property Owner/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 8 ends

For buildings with more than ten tenant-occupants,
changing/shower facilities shall be provided as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.

Preferential parking for low-emitting, fuel-efficient, and carpool/van vehicles shall be provided as specified in
Section A5.106.5.1 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.

Facilities shall be installed to support future electric vehicle charging at each nonresidential building with 30 or more parking spaces. Installation shall be consistent with Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary
Measures) of the CALGreen Code and the Long Beach
Municipal Code.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Property Owner/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 9
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
AQ -7 New industrial land uses that have industrial equipment which requires a permit to operate from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, or have the potential to generate 40 or more diesel trucks per day, and are located within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g. residential, schools, hospitals, nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Long Beach prior to future discretionary project approval. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the applicable air quality management district. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk exceeds ten in one million (I0E 06), that particulate matter concentrations would exceed 2.5 µg/m3, or that the appropriate noncancer hazard index exceeds 1.0, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T BACTs) are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling onsite, electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, and requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles. T BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the project.

Prior to future
discretionary
project approval
Property Owner/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 10 ends

5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1 Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a biological resources report conducted by a qualified biologist.

The biological resources report shall include: analysis of available literature and databases (CNDDB); historical sensitive biological resources; review of current land use and land ownership within the project vicinity; on-site survey and mapping that delineates vegetation communities present within the development area; identification of jurisdictional waters and special status habitat, wildlife, and plant species. Focused surveys for sensitive, threatened, endangered species, will also be prepared, as required. The project applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development and project design avoids impacts to special status species and habitats, in consultation with CDFW and USFWS. If complete avoidance is not possible, the project applicant shall obtain necessary permits from CDFW and USFWS.

Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall submit plans, required permits, and mitigation plans (if needed) to the Long Beach Development Services Department for review and approval.

Concurrent with
submittal of site
development plans
and prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 11
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
BIO-2 Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a jurisdictional delineation prepared by a qualified biologist or letters stating that no such jurisdictional features exist. The jurisdictional delineation shall be prepared pursuant to the requirements of (1) US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, (2) CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, (3) RWQB jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and Section 13260 of the Porter-Cologne Act, and (4) wetlands as defined under the California Coastal Act. The project shall be designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. If wetland avoidance is not possible, the applicant shall ensure no net loss of wetlands either by creation of applicant-sponsored wetlands or purchase of mitigation bank credits in consultation with applicable Federal- and State- agencies (Corps, CDFW, RWQB, and/or Coastal Commission). Any mitigation, replacement, and/or restoration of habitat shall occur in the LCWC or in an approved coastal mitigation bank that covers this area. If the applicant can demonstrate that there are no logistically viable opportunities for mitigation within the LCWC, the applicant may propose mitigation elsewhere, which must be approved by the City and the resource agencies. The mitigation plan prepared in consultation with the applicable agencies shall include: responsibilities and of persons to supervise and implement the plan, site selection, restoration and creation of habitat; site preparation and planting implementation, schedule, maintenance guidelines, monitoring plan (5 year minimum), and long-term preservation. Prior to the issuance of grading permits covering jurisdictional areas, the project applicant shall provide evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that (1) all necessary permits or authorizations have been obtained from the Corps (pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), CDFW (pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, and RWQCB (pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act), the Concurrent with
submittal of site
development plans
and prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 12 ends

BIO-3 If sensitive biological resources are identified within or abutting to the proposed development area, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that a qualified biologist has been retained to prepare a construction management plan. The construction limits shall be clearly flagged and/or fenced. No construction access, parking, storage of equipment, or waste dirt or rubble will be permitted within such marked areas. A monitoring biologist shall be onsite during any grading activities. The qualified biologist shall also develop and implement a project specific contractor training program to educate project contractors on the sensitive biological resources within and adjacent to the proposed development project area and oversee measures to avoid and/or minimize impacts to these species.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 13
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
BIO-4 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any development, the project applicant shall include noise reduction measures to reduce noise impacts to wildlife. A note shall be provided on development plans indicating that throughout grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit constructionrelated noise:

During all excavation and grading on-site, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.

The construction contractor shall place all stationary
construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors (wildlife) nearest the project site.

The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive
receptors (wildlife) during all project construction.

No construction shall occur within 500 feet of nesting raptors or threatened or endangered species and 100 feet of all other nesting birds protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
BIO-5 Prior to approval of any development adjacent to jurisdictional waters or habitat for special status species and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the project’s contribution of nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 foot-candles at the edge of the habitat. This would ensure that spill light does not result in exposure of artificial light at levels exceeding the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.5 foot-candles).

Prior to approval of
any development
adjacent to
jurisdictional
waters or habitat
for special status
species and all
land within the
Coastal Habitat
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 14 ends

Prior to approval of
a trails/access plan
within or adjacent
to jurisdictional
waters
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
BIO-7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant and/or subsequent builder shall prepare an urban-open space interface brochure to be approved by the Long Beach Development Services Department to educate residents on the responsibilities associated with living near sensitive biological habitat. The brochure shall address relevant issues, including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants, including the “Light’s Out for Birds” programs. The approved brochure, along with attachments, shall be included as part of the rental/lease agreements and as part of the sales literature for future developments.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 15
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
BIO-8 If construction is proposed between January 15 to September 1st, a qualified biologist must conduct a nesting bird survey(s) no more than three days prior to initiation of construction activities to document the presence or absence of nesting birds in or adjacent to the project site.

The preconstruction survey(s) will focus on identifying any raptors and/or passerines nests that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction activities. Any nest permanently vacated for the season would not warrant protection pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

If active nests are documented, the following measures are required:

Species-specific measures shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented to prevent abandonment of the active nest. At a minimum, grading in the vicinity of a nest shall be postponed until the young birds have fledged. A minimum exclusion buffer of 100 feet shall be maintained during construction, depending on the species and location.

The perimeter of the nest setback zone shall be fenced or adequately demarcated with stakes and flagging at 20-foot intervals, and construction personnel and activities are restricted from the area.

A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying that no active nests are present, or that the young have fledged, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to initiation of grading in the nest-setback zone. The qualified biologist shall serve as a biological monitor during those periods when construction activities occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.

A final report of the findings, prepared by a qualified biologist, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to construction-related activities that have the potential to disturb any active nests during the nesting season.

No more than
three days prior to
initiation of
construction
activities
Project Applicant/
Developer and a
qualified biologist
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 16 ends

5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-1 Future development or redevelopment projects on or near buildings or structures 45 years of age or older shall require an intensive-level historical evaluation. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer shall prepare the evaluation in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines for evaluating historical resources. If, based on the evaluation of the property, it is determined that the proposed development or redevelopment project will have a substantial adverse effect on a historical resource (i.e., it would reduce its integrity to the point that it would no longer be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or in the list of Long Beach Landmarks), then the provisions of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 shall be implemented by the property owner or project
applicant/developer to eliminate or reduce the project’s impact on historical resources.

Prior to issuance
of grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
CUL-2 If, based on the intensive-level historical evaluation required under Mitigation Measure CUL-1, it is determined that the proposed development or redevelopment project will have a substantial adverse effect on a historical resource, the City of Long Beach shall require the property owner or project applicant/developer to implement the following measures:

A. Rehabilitation According to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards

1. If the proposed project includes renovation, alteration, or an addition to a historical resource (not including total
demolition), then the property owner or project
applicant/developer shall first seek to design all proposed renovation, alterations, or additions to the historical resource in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (Standards), found at:
http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand. htm.

Prior to any
disturbance of a
historical resource,
as determined by
the intensive-level
historical
evaluation of a
property
Property Owner
or Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 17
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
a. Plans for rehabilitation shall be created under the
supervision of a professional meeting the Department of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in
Architectural History or Historic Architecture and be
designed by a licensed architect with demonstrated
historic preservation experience.
b. Plans shall be reviewed in the schematic design phase prior to any construction work, as well as in the 60 and 90 percent construction documents phases, for compliance
with the Standards by a historic preservation professional meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualifications Standards with demonstrated experience
with the Standards compliance reviews.
c. The qualified historic preservation professional reviewing the plans shall create a technical memo at each phase
and submit the memo to the City of Long Beach
Development Services Department for concurrence.
d. At the discretion of the City, a detailed character-defining features analysis and/or historical resource treatment plan may need to be prepared for select historical resources by a historic preservation professional meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards if the nature of the project or the significance of the property warrants such detailed analysis.
e. A qualified historic preservation professional shall monitor construction activities at key milestones to ensure that the work to be conducted complies with the Standards. The
milestones shall be agreed upon in advance by the City
and property owner or project applicant/developer.
f. City staff and the qualified historic preservation
professional shall review the finished
rehabilitation/renovation in person upon completion.
g. In the event that any historical resource(s) are leased to

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 18 ends

B. Retention/On-Site Relocation- For Proposed Demolition

1. If the proposed project includes total demolition of a historical resource, the property owner or project
applicant/developer shall first consider an alternative that retains the historical resource and incorporates it into the overall project development as an adaptive re-use of the building.

2. If the project site permits, the historical resource should be relocated to another location on the site, and the resource should be reincorporated into the overall project.

3. If the City determines that retention/onsite relocation of the historical resource is not feasible through a credible
feasibility study, the City shall elect to allow the property owner or project applicant/developer to move forward with the development/redevelopment project; however, all other requirements outlined in this mitigation measure shall apply.

C. Third Party Sale

1. If the City determines that retention or onsite relocation of the historical resource is not feasible, then the property owner or project applicant/developer shall offer any historical resources scheduled for demolition to the public for sale and offsite relocation by a third party:
a. The historic resource(s) shall be advertised by the
property owner or project applicant/developer at a
minimum in the following locations: project
applicant’s/developer’s website (if applicable); City of

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 19
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
Long Beach website; Los Angeles Times website and
print editions; Long Beach Press Telegram.
b. The bidding period shall remain open for 60 days after the date of advertisement to allow adequate response
time from interested parties.
c. Qualified parties shall meet the following minimum
qualifications to be considered a realistic buyer:
possess adequate financial resources to relocate and
rehabilitate the historical resource(s); possess an
available location for the historical resource(s); and
provide for a new use for the historical resource(s).
d. The City shall approve the qualified buyer. If no such buyer comes forward within the allotted time frame, the City shall elect to issue a demolition permit for the
historical resource. However, all other requirements
outlined in this mitigation measure shall apply.

D. Recordation

1. The property owner or project applicant/developer shall create HABS-like Level II documentation prepared in
accordance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Architectural and Engineering
Documentation. Information on the Standards and
Guidelines is available at the following links:
http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/arch_stnds_6.htm.
http://www.nps.gov/history/hdp/standards/index.htm.
a. Photographs with large-format black-and-white
negatives (4 inches by 5 inches or larger) of the
property as a whole shall be provided; photocopies with large format negatives of select existing drawings, site plans, or historic views where available. A minimum of
12 views showing context and relationship of historical resources to each other shall be provided; aerial views showing the whole property shall also be provided.

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 20 ends

Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
b. Written historical descriptive data, index to
photographs, and photo key plan shall be provided.
c. The above items shall be created by a historic
preservation professional meeting the Secretary of the
Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards with
demonstrated experience in creating HABS Level II
documentation.
d. The above items shall be created prior to any
demolition or relocation work.
e. The above items shall be distributed to the following repositories for use by future researchers and
educators. Before submitting any documents, each of
the following repositories shall be contacted to ensure that they are willing and able to accept the items: City of Long Beach Public Library; Long Beach Historical
Society; Los Angeles Public Library; South Central
Coastal Information Center at California State
University, Fullerton; and City of Long Beach
Development Services Department (building files).

E. Salvage and Reuse

1. If offsite relocation of the historical resource by a third party is not accomplished, the property owner or project
applicant/developer shall create a salvage and reuse plan identifying elements and materials of the resource that can be saved prior to any demolition work.
a. The salvage and reuse plan shall be included in bid
documents prepared for the site and shall be created
by a historic preservation professional meeting the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards with demonstrated experience in creating
salvage and reuse plans.
b. Elements and materials that may be salvageable
include windows; doors; roof tiles; decorative elements;

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 21
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
bricks, foundation materials, and/or paving materials;
framing members; furniture; lighting; and flooring
materials, such as tiles and hardwood.

2. The property owner or project applicant/developer shall identify individuals, organizations, or businesses interested in receiving the salvaged items; these may include Habitat for Humanity Restore; other affordable housing
organizations; or salvage yards. The following steps shall be taken by the property owner or project applicant/developer:
a. Identification of the individuals, organizations, or businesses interested in receiving the salvaged items
shall be completed in consultation with the City.
b. Identification of the individuals, organizations, or businesses interested in receiving the salvaged items
shall be accomplished by contacting potentially
interested parties directly first.
c. Items to be salvaged shall be advertised in the
following locations for a period of 60 days if none of the contacted parties are able to receive the items: Los
Angeles Times and Long Beach Press Telegram.

3. The property owner or project applicant/developer shall remove salvageable items in the gentlest, least destructive manner possible. Historic materials and features shall be protected by storing salvaged items in indoor, climate- and weather-controlled conditions until recipients can retrieve them. The removal of salvageable items shall be performed by a licensed contractor with demonstrated experience with implementing salvage and reuse plans.

F. Other Optional Interpretive, Commemorative, or Educational Measures
The City may also elect to require additional (optional) mitigation measures crafted in response to a specific historical resource’s

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 22 ends

Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
property type or significance, association with a specific historic person, or overall value to the community, as practical, so long as the measure is commensurate with the significance of the property and the level of impact to that resource. Such measures may include educational or interpretive programming; signage; incorporation of historical features into new developments or public art; contribution to a mitigation fund for future historic preservation efforts; written histories or contexts important to the public’s understanding of the lost resource (presuming no other extant resource can interpret such significance); etc. The need for these additional measures shall be determined by the City on a case-by-case basis and incorporated into the conditions of approval for the project. Some measures may be made available to the public through museum displays, written reports at research repositories, onor offsite signage, or existing online multimedia sites.

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 23
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, and for any subsequent permit involving excavation to increased depth, the project applicant for each development or redevelopment project considered for approval pursuant to the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall provide letters to the City of Long Beach from a qualified archaeologist and paleontologist (for excavations five feet below ground surface and deeper) who meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards.

The letters shall state that the project applicant has retained these individuals, and that the archaeological consultant will be present during all grading in previously undisturbed areas and other significant ground-disturbing activities and that the paleontological consultant will be present during all grading that occurs below 5 feet from the ground surface. In the event archeological or paleontological resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities, the professional archeological or paleontological monitor shall have the authority to halt any activities adversely impacting potentially significant cultural resources until they can be formally evaluated. Suspension of ground disturbances in the vicinity of the discoveries shall not be lifted until the archaeological and/or paleontological monitor, in coordination with the construction contractor, has evaluated discoveries to assess whether they are significant cultural resources, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If significance criteria are met, then the project shall be required to perform data recovery, professional identification, radiocarbon dates as applicable, and other special studies. The resources shall be offered for curation or preservation to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an educational and research interest in the materials, such as the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History or California State University, Fullerton, or other local museum or repository. If no museum or repository is willing to accept the resource, the resource shall be considered the property of the City and may be stored, disposed of, transferred, exchanged, or otherwise handled by the City at its discretion.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits,
and for any
subsequent permit
involving
excavation to
increased depth
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 24 ends

Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
CUL-4 At least 30 days prior to ground disturbance by each project development or redevelopment in conformance with the Specific Plan, the City of Long Beach would notify the three Native American tribal representatives who requested Native American monitoring of grounddisturbing activities (Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians Kizh Nation, Gabrieleño/Tongva Band of Mission Indians, and Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation). For each project, the project applicant would retain one certified Native American monitor who would accompany the professional archaeological monitor during on-call monitoring. The Native American monitor would have the same authority to halt activities that could adversely impact archaeological or tribal cultural resources that the professional archaeological monitor would. The Native American monitor would recommend measures to avoid, preserve, and/or recover Native American archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources, as practicable, and would convey such resources to the pertinent tribe or most likely descendant, as applicable.

At least 30 days
prior to ground
disturbance
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
CUL-5 Any development that is proposed on undeveloped or vacant land shall prepare a Phase I Cultural Resources Investigation prior to the issuance of grading permits. The cultural report shall be prepared by a qualified archeologist consistent with the most recent standards and guidelines. The report shall set forth criteria for evaluating the significance of resources discovered during construction and identify appropriate data recovery methods and procedures to mitigate project impacts on significant resources. At a minimum, the report shall include a summary of available information on known sites and sensitive locations in the project area; a historical context for the evaluation of resources that may be encountered during construction; data requirements and the appropriate field and laboratory methods to be used to acquire data needed for significance evaluation and impact mitigation. The report will also identify specific locations where cultural resources monitors would be required during grading and identify reporting and curating requirements for artifacts uncovered during Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 25
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
construction.

CUL-6 If human remains are encountered during construction excavation and grading activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the county coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition, pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the NAHC. The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Preservation of the remains in place or project design alternatives shall be considered.

Within 24 hours of
discovering human
remains of Native
American descent
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 26 ends

5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for individual development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the project applicant/developer shall submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department to identify environmental conditions of the development site and determine whether contamination is present. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared by an Environmental Professional in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527.13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments:

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. If recognized environmental conditions related to soils or groundwater are identified in the Phase I ESA, the project applicant shall perform soil and soil gas sampling, as required, as a part of a Phase II ESA. If contamination is found at significant levels, the project applicant shall remediate all contaminated soils with the oversight and in accordance with state and local agency requirements (California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Long Beach Fire Department, etc.). All contaminated soils and/or material encountered shall be disposed of at a regulated site and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations prior to the completion of grading. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report documenting the completion, results, and any follow-up remediation on the recommendations, if any, shall be provided to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department evidencing that all site remediation activities have been completed.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 27
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
HAZ-2 If soil is encountered during Project area development that is suspected of being impacted by hazardous materials, work at the subject construction activity area shall be halted, and the suspect site conditions shall be evaluated by a qualified environmental professional.

The results of the evaluation shall be submitted to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), or the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or other applicable oversight agency, as appropriate, and the necessary response/remedial measures shall be implemented—as directed by DTSC, RWQCB, or other applicable oversight agency—until all specified requirements of the oversight agencies are satisfied and a no further action status is attained.

During grading
activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Long Beach
Development
Services

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 28 ends

The project applicant shall retain a California Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) to perform abatement project
planning, monitoring (including air monitoring), oversight, and reporting of all asbestos-containing materials (ACM) encountered. The abatement, containment, and disposal of all ACM shall be conducted in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 1403 and
California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1529
(Asbestos).

The project applicant shall retain a licensed or certified lead inspector/assessor to conduct the abatement, containment, and disposal of all lead waste encountered. The contracted lead inspector/assessor shall be certified by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). All lead abatement shall be performed by a CDPH-certified lead supervisor or a CDPHcertified worker under the direct supervision of a lead supervisor certified by CDPH. The abatement, containment, and disposal of all lead waste encountered shall be conducted in accordance with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rule 29; CFR Part 1926; and California Code of Regulation, Title 8, Section 1532.1 (Lead).

Evidence of the contracted professionals attained by the project applicant shall be provided to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department. Additionally, contractors performing ACM and lead waste removal shall provide
evidence of abatement activities to the City of Long Beach Building and Safety Bureau.

Prior to the
issuance of
demolition permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Long Beach
Development
Services

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 29
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor

5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
HYD-1 Prior to the issuance of permits for any development or redevelopment projects pursuant to the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the City of Long Beach shall ensure that the following drainage improvements are fully funded for and implemented:

Any development or redevelopment project that would
impact existing storm drain facilities within the Southeast Area Specific Plan area (public and private) that is less than 24-inches in size shall fully fund upsizing of such facilities to a minimum 24-inch or greater pipe size as prescribed by City of Long Beach Public Works Department.

Any development or redevelopment project that would
impact the four segments of City of Long Beach’s storm
drains in Pacific Coast Highway for which improvements
were recommended by the 2005 Master Plan of Drainage
Update shall fully fund upsizing of those storm drain
segments as indicated below or other final size as
prescribed by City of Long Beach Public Works Department.

Segments 220835 and 220015 to 30 inches;
Segment 220805 to 54 inches;
Segment 220710 to 84 inches.

Any development or redevelopment project that would
impact the four segments of City of Long Beach’s storm
drains in Seville Way (Segment 220810) for which
improvements were recommended by the 2005 Master Plan
of Drainage Update shall fully fund upsizing of that storm drain segment to 48 inches or other final size as prescribed by City of Long Beach Public Works Department.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading or
building permits
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department in
coordination with
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 30 ends

Prior to the
issuance of
grading or
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

HYD-3 The project applicant/developer of each development or redevelopment project that would be accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall request the “allowable discharge rate” – which limits peak flow discharges as compared to existing conditions based on regional flood control constraints – from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, and shall comply with such discharge rate. Compliance with the “allowable discharge rate” shall be demonstrated in the hydrology and hydraulic study to be completed pursuant to Mitigation Measure HYD-2.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading or building
permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

HYD-4 The project applicant/developer, architect, and construction contractor for each development or redevelopment project that would be accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall incorporate low-impact development (LID) best management practices (BMPs) within the respective project, providing for water quality treatment and runoff reduction and/or detention in accordance with local stormwater permit requirements.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading or building
permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer,
Architect, and
Construction
Contractor
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

HYD-5 Upon submission of development applications for development projects in the tsunami inundation zone (as identified in the City’s Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan) the Development Services Department shall provide project applicants with tsunami awareness and preparedness materials.

During
development
applications
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 31
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
HYD-6 Prior to certificate of occupancy, project applicants and developers shall demonstrate to the Development Services Department that lease agreements and disclosures provided to homeowners and tenants disclose that those parties would be in a tsunami inundation zone (as identified in the City’s Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan). This notification shall include tsunami awareness and preparedness materials as well as information outlining applicable evacuation plans and routes.

Prior to certificate
of occupancy
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

5.12 NOISE
N-1 Prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits for development projects accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan, a note shall be provided on development plans indicating that ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise:

Construction activity is limited to the daytime hours between 7 AM to 7 PM on Monday through Friday and 9 AM to 6 PM
on Saturday, as prescribed in the City’s municipal code.

Construction is prohibited on Sundays.

All internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers.

Stationary equipment such as generators and air
compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise-sensitive uses.

Stockpiling is located as far as feasible from nearby noisesensitive receptors.

Construction traffic shall be limited to the haul routes established by the City of Long Beach.

Prior to issuance
of demolition,
grading, and/or
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer and
Architect
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 32 ends

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

N-3 Prior to issuance of a building permit for projects involving the development of new industrial uses within 200 feet of any existing residential use, the property owner/developer shall retain an acoustical engineer to conduct an acoustic analysis that includes a vibration analysis for potential impacts from vibration generated by industrial activities. The detailed acoustical analysis shall be submitted to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department for review and shall demonstrate that the vibration levels at any nearby residential use would be below 78 VdB during the daytime (7 AM to 10 PM) and 72 VdB during the nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM), which are the Federal Transit Administration’s daytime and nighttime criteria to regulate general vibration impacts at affected residential uses.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer and
Acoustical
Engineer
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 33

5.16 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC
TRAF-1 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit pursuant to the proposed Project, the City of Long Beach shall update the City’s traffic mitigation fee program to include the improvements outlined in Mitigation Measure TRAF-3. The City shall prepare a "nexus" study that will serve as the basis for requiring development impact fees under AB 1600 legislation, as codified by California Code Government Section 66000 et seq., to support changes under consideration for the SEASP. The established procedures under AB 1600 require that a "reasonable relationship" or nexus exist between the traffic improvements and facilities required to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development pursuant to the proposed Project.

Traffic improvements and facilities necessary to mitigate the Project impacts shall be included, among other improvements, in the AB 1600 nexus study. The City’s fee program shall be updated based on the nexus study. Fees are assessed when there is new construction, an increase in square footage in an existing building, or the conversion of existing square footage to a more intensive use. The development fees collected are applied toward circulation improvements and right-of-way acquisition.

Fees are calculated by multiplying the proposed square footage, dwelling unit, or hotel room by the appropriate rate. Traffic mitigation fees are included with any other applicable fees payable at the time the building permit is issued. The City will use the traffic mitigation fees to fund construction (or to recoup fees advanced to fund construction) of the transportation improvements identified in Mitigation Measure TRAF-3.

Prior to issuance
of the first building
permit
City of Long
Beach
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
TRAF-2 As part of the subsequent environmental review for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, a site-specific traffic study shall be prepared by the project applicant/developer to evaluate the project’s potential traffic and transportation impacts consistent with the City of Long Beach Guidelines for Signalized Intersections and the Los Angeles County CMP Guidelines to identify specific improvements, as deemed necessary, to provide safe and efficient onsite circulation and access, and limit cut through traffic on adjacent neighborhoods. The traffic study for the first development project to be considered under the SEASP shall include an analysis of signal timing of 2nd Street through Naples to identify timing adjustments needed to improve signal synchronization.

The traffic study shall be approved by the Public Works Department.

Payment of fees, construction of improvements, and signal timing shall be implemented prior to issuance of a building permit.

As part of the
subsequent
environmental
review for
development
projects
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 34 ends

TRAF-3 Prior to issuance of building permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall make fair-share payments to the City of Long Beach toward construction of the traffic improvements listed below. The following traffic improvements and facilities are necessary to mitigate impacts of the SEASP and shall be included in the City’s fee mechanism(s):

Existing With Project Improvements
Studebaker Road & SR-22 Westbound Ramps: Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and fair-share contributions from area developments.

3. Studebaker Road & SR-22 Westbound Ramps: Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and fair-share contributions from area developments. Alternatively, the intersection could remain signalized with the following improvements:

Modify the westbound approach from two left turn lanes and one right turn lane, to three left turn lanes and one right turn lane.

Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane and one through lane, to one left turn lane and three through lanes.

Optimize the AM and PM signal cycle lengths and splits.

17. Shopkeeper Road & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:

Modify the northbound approach from one shared throughleft turn lane and one right turn lane, to one shared throughleft turn lane and two right turn lanes.

Prior to the
issuance of
occupancy permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 35
Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared
through-right turn lane.

27. 2nd Street & Bay Shore Ave Avenue: This intersection would require the following improvements:

Reconfigure the northbound approach to provide a
dedicated left-turn lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane.

Add a southbound right-turn lane.

Add an eastbound right-turn lane and restripe the shared through/right-turn lane as a through lane.

Cumulative Year (2035) With Project Improvements

3. and 11. Studebaker Road & SR-22 West- and Eastbound Ramps:

Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP).

Alternatively, the intersection could remain signalized and with the following improvements:

Modify the westbound approach from two left turn lanes and one right turn lane, to three left turn lanes and one right turn lane.

Modify the northbound approach from one through lane and one shared through-right turn lane, to two through lanes and one shared through-right turn lane.

Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane and one through lane, to one left turn lane and three through lanes.

Optimize the AM and PM signal cycle lengths and splits.

15. Marina Drive & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:

Modify the northbound approach from one left turn lane, one

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 36 ends

shared through-left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane.

Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane, one shared through-left turn lane, and one right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane.

Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared
through-right turn lane.

17. Shopkeeper Road & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:

Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared
through-right turn lane.

Modify the eastbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane.

20. PCH & Studebaker Road: This intersection would require the following improvements:

Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, one right turn lane, and one right turn lane, to one left turn lane, three through lanes, one right turn lane.

Optimization of the PM signal cycle lengths and splits.

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 37
TRAF-4 Prior to issuance of building permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall make fair-share payments to the City of Seal Beach toward construction of the traffic improvement listed below. Fair-share payments shall occur through either: 1) an agreement between the developer and City of Seal Beach to pay fair share funding for the improvement or 2) payment to the City of Seal Beach traffic mitigation fee program that is based on nexus requirements contained in the Mitigation Fee Act (Govt. Code § 66000 et seq.) and 14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15126.4(a)(4). The traffic mitigation fee program must include the intersection improvements identified below. If the City’s traffic fee program has not incorporated the intersections identified below at the time of building permits and the applicant has made reasonable efforts to contribute its fair share, then project applicants shall have no further obligation to comply with this mitigation measure.

9. Seal Beach Boulevard & 2nd Street/Westminster
Boulevard: Modify the northbound approach from having one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to having one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane.

22. PCH & Seal Beach Boulevard: This intersection would require three through lanes on the northbound approach.

Prior to the
issuance of
occupancy permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department
TRAF-5 Prior to issuance of grading permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall prepare a construction management plan. The construction management plan shall be approved by the City of Long Beach Public Works Department. The construction management plan shall identify construction hours, truck routes, travel patterns for haul routes, staging and parking areas, staggered worker arrival times, and safety procedures for pedestrians and cyclists. The construction management plan shall prohibit the use of heavy construction vehicles during peak hours. The plan shall also require the construction contractor to implement the following measures during construction activities, which shall be discussed at the pre-grading conference/meeting:

Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes and provide temporary traffic controls, such as a flag person, during all roadway improvement activities to maintain adequate access for Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 38 ends

emergency vehicles and personnel.

Develop a traffic plan to minimize interference for emergency vehicles and personnel from demolition and construction activities (e.g., advanced public notice of demolition and construction activities)
TRAF-6 Prior to issuance of the first the occupancy permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, the City and Caltrans shall jointly identify feasible operational and physical improvements and the associated fair-share funding contribution necessary to mitigate Project-related impacts to state transportation facilities. In the event that Caltrans prepares a valid study, as defined below, that identifies fair share contribution funding sources attributable to and paid from private and public development to supplement other regional and State funding sources necessary undertake improvements to the I-22, I-605, and I-405, in the Project study area, then the project applicant shall use reasonable efforts to pay the applicable fair share amount to Caltrans.

The study shall be reviewed and approved by the California Transportation Commission. It shall include fair share contributions related to private and or public development based on nexus requirements contained in the Mitigation Fee Act (Govt. Code § 66000 et seq.) and 14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15126.4(a)(4) and, to this end, the study shall recognize that impacts to Caltrans I-22, I-605, and I-405 facilities that are not attributable to development located within the City of Long Beach are not required to pay in excess of such developments’ fair share obligations. The fee study shall also be compliant with Government Code § 66001(g) and any other applicable provisions of law. The study shall set forth a timeline and other relevant criteria for implementation of the recommendations contained within the study to the extent the other agencies agree to participate in the fee study program.

In the event the study has been prepared, project applicants shall use reasonable efforts to pay the fair share amount to Caltrans. If Caltrans chooses to accept the project applicant’s fair share payment, Caltrans shall apply the payment to the fee program adopted by Caltrans or agreed upon by the City and Caltrans as a result of the fair share fee study. Caltrans shall only accept the fair share payment if the fair share Prior to the
issuance of the
first occupancy
permits
City of Long
Beach
Long Beach
Development
Services and
Public Works
Departments
Long Beach
Development
Services
Department

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
August 2017 Page 39
fee study has been completed. If, within five years from the date that the first building permit is issued for the Project, Caltrans has not completed the fair share fee study, then project applicants shall have no further obligation to comply with this mitigation measure

S O U T H E A S T A R E A S P E C I F I C P L A N M I T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G A N D R E P O R T I N G P R O G R A M

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 40 ends

This page intentionally left blank.

Long Beach City CouncilJuly 18, 2023

Long Beach City Council
July 18, 2023