Table 18 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
TRAF-4 Prior to issuance of building permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall make fair-share payments to the City of Seal Beach toward construction of the traffic improvement listed below. Fair-share payments shall occur through either: 1) an agreement between the developer and City of Seal Beach to pay fair share funding for the improvement or 2) payment to the City of Seal Beach traffic mitigation fee program that is based on nexus requirements contained in the Mitigation Fee Act (Govt. Code § 66000 et seq.) and 14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15126.4(a)(4). The traffic mitigation fee program must include the intersection improvements identified below. If the City’s traffic fee program has not incorporated the intersections identified below at the time of building permits and the applicant has made reasonable efforts to contribute its fair share, then project applicants shall have no further obligation to comply with this mitigation measure. • 9. Seal Beach Boulevard & 2nd Street/Westminster Boulevard: Modify the northbound approach from having one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to having one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. • 22. PCH & Seal Beach Boulevard: This intersection would require three through lanes on the northbound approach.
TRAF-5 Prior to issuance of grading permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall prepare a construction management plan. The construction management plan shall be approved by the City of Long Beach Public Works Department. The construction management plan shall identify construction hours, truck routes, travel patterns for haul routes, staging and parking areas, staggered worker arrival times, and safety procedures for pedestrians and cyclists. The construction management plan shall prohibit the use of heavy construction vehicles during peak hours. The plan shall also require the construction contractor to implement the following measures during construction activities, which shall be discussed at the pre-grading conference/meeting:
• Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes and provide temporary traffic controls, such as a flag person, during all roadway improvement activities to maintain adequate access for emergency vehicles and personnel.
• Develop a traffic plan to minimize interference for emergency vehicles and personnel from demolition and construction activities (e.g., advanced public notice of demolition and construction activities)
6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T
C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
April 2023 Page 183
This page intentionally left blank.
April 2023 Page 184
5. References
ARUP. 2023, February. Marina Shores | 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA Flood Resilience Assessment. (Appendix G).
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines.
California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA). 2022, April. CalEEMod, California Emissions Estimator Model User Guide, Version 2022.1. https://www.caleemod.com/user-guide.
California Geological Survey (CGS). 2010. San Gabriel Valley P-C Region Showing MRZ-2 Areas and Active Mine Operations.
California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2022a, December 14 (accessed). California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/agriculture/. ———. 2022b, December 14 (accessed). California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=18f7488c0a9d4d299f5 e9c33b312f312.
———. 2022c, December 18 (accessed). Well Finder.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/-118.10476/33.75586/16.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). 2022, December 18 (accessed). Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2022, December 26 (accessed). California State Scenic Highway System Map. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/ index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa.
California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022, January 24 (updated). Electric Utility Service Area California, 2020. https://cecgis-caenergy.opendata.arcgis.com/documents/CAEnergy::electric-utility-serviceareas/explore. ———. 2023, January 11 (accessed). Electricity Consumption by Planning Area. http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyplan.aspx.
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2022, December 21 (accessed). CPUC High Fire Threat District (HFTD). https://capuc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/ index.html?id=5bdb921d747a46929d9f00dbdb6d0fa2.
6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T
C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
5. References
April 2023 Page 185
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 2022, December 30 (accessed). FCC National Broadband Map. https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/location-summary/mobile?lon=-118.107383&lat=33.753012& addr_full=33.753012%2C+-118.107383&zoom=15.00&env=0&tech=tech4g.
Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2023, January 3 (accessed). FEMA Flood Map Service Center:
Search By Address (Interactive Map). https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search#searchresultsanchor.
Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.
Fehr & Peers. 2023, January 19. Memorandum: 6700 Pacific Coast Highway Transportation Consistency Findings with the SEASP PEIR. (Appendix I)
Geotechnical Professionals Inc. (GPI). 2022, July 29. Geotechnical Investigation: Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development 6700 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California. (Appendix D) Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA). 2023, February. Biological Technical Report 6700 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California. (Appendix C).
Labib Funk + Associates (LFA). 2023, January 30. Hydrology and LID Report for MRNA. (Appendix F) ———. 2022, September 13. Sewer Area Study for MRNA. (Appendix J) Long Beach, City of. 1989, July 1. Land Use Element of the Long Beach General Plan. ———. 2017a, September. Southeast Area Specific Plan 2060. ———. 2017b, August. Southeast Area Specific Plan EIR. State Clearinghouse No. 2015101075. ———. 2017c, February 28. Hazard Mitigation Plan.
———. 2020, June. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines.
———. 2022a, November 2 (accessed). Interactive Bike Map: Go Active LB. https://longbeach.gov/goactivelb/resources/interactive-bike-map. ———. 2022b, August. Long Beach Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/lbds/media-library/documents/planning/lb-cap/adoptedlb-cap_-aug-2022, accessed November 17, 2022. ———. 2022c, Long Beach Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, Appendix D: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Consistency Review Checklist and Technical Support Documentation, https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/lbds/medialibrary/documents/planning/environmental/environmental-reports/pending/climate-action-andadaptation-plan-and-safety-element-update/appendix-d---caap-checklist-and-technical-supportdocumentation, accessed January 6, 2023. ———. Natural Gas Utility. https://www.longbeach.gov/energyresources/about-us/natural-gas/. 6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T
C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
5. References
Long Beach Parks, Recreation And Marine (LBPRM). 2022a, December 22 (accessed). About The Department. https://www.longbeach.gov/park/business-operations/about. ———. 2022b, January. Long Beach Parks, Recreation & Marine Department Parks Make Long Beach:
Strategic Plan for 2022-2032. https://www.longbeach.gov/park/business-operations/about/ prm-strategic-plan/.
Los Angeles County. Office of the Assessor. 2022, November 3 (accessed). Property Assessment Information System. https://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/m/.
Northgate Environmental Management Inc. 2021, December 8. Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments. (Appendix E)
Orange County. 2020, December 23. Approval of Addendum No. 6 to Final EIR No. 588 (SCH #2004011055) Regional Landfill Options for Orange County (RELOOC) Strategic Plan Olinda Alpha Landfill Implementation -Revision to Solid Waste Facility Permit to Update Landfill Closure Date (OC Waste & Recycling CEQA Log #634).
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020, September 3. Connect SoCal (2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy). https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan -adopted-final-plan.
Southern California Edison (SCE). 2022. 2021 Power Content Label. https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/custom-files/Web%20files/2021%20Power%20Conten t%20Label.pdf.
———. 2021 Power Content Label. https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/customfiles/Web%20files/2021%20Power%20Content%20Label.pdf.
South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD). 2005, May. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/ default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf. ———. 2022, December 2. Final 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022-air-quality-management-plan/final-2022- aqmp/final-2022-aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=10.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2023a, February 16 (accessed). National Inventory of Dams: Whittier Narrows Dam. https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/#/dams/system/CA10027/risk ———. 2023b, February 16 (accessed). National Inventory of Dams, Whittier Narrows Dam Interactive Map: MH Breach 241.3 ft. https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/viewer/ ———. 2023c, February 16 (accessed). Whittier Narrows Dam Safety Modification Project. https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Dam-Safety-Program/Whittier-NarrowsDam-Safety-Modification-Project/ 6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T
C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
5. References
April 2023 Page 187
United States Census Bureau. 2020 Decennial Census. H1: Occupancy Status. https://data.census.gov/ cedsci/table?q=long%20beach%20dwelling%20units&tid=DECENNIALPL2020.H1. ———. 2020 Decennial Census. P1: Race. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=long%20beach %20ca%20population&tid=DECENNIALPL2020.P1.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022, December 28 (accessed). National Wetlands Inventory. https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands-mapper/.
United States Green Building Council (USGBC). 2008. Building Area per Employee by Business Type.
Veneklasen Associates. 2022, December 1. Noise and Vibration Impact Compliance Letter. (Appendix H) April 2023 Page 188
6. List of Preparers
CITY OF LONG BEACH (LEAD AGENCY)
Amy Harbin, Planner
PLACEWORKS
Addie Farrell, Principal in Charge
Mariana Zimmermann, Project Manager
Nicole Vermilion, Principal AQ/GHG
Lance Park, Senior Associate AQ/GHG
Emily Parks, Project Planner AQ/GHG
Gina Froelich, Senior Editor
Cary Nakama, Graphics Specialist
HOLLAND PARTNER GROUP (APPLICANT)
Clement Tsay
Stephen MacNeil
6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T
C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H
5. List of Preparers
April 2023 Page 189
This page intentionally left blank.
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix A MMRP
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
!"
#
$%&'()
*+,-.+,/012+30
456789:8;<=>?@A
$'(B )!
C)&D
$EFG HFIJ'$(&HK'$$!$L
!(&
M&J&K
CN&$O&J!(&M&C'N&$FHK'$$!$%&'
PPPQRL(&'$%
K&J'IFS)TK
#
$%&'()F 'K!
$!'UV
SWRS
RWVV
)!
C)&RD
$EXK
$Y&'()R
J
*+,-.+,/0Z[30
\]?@>^8_`a
$'(Bb!(
K&c
&FdeF
(!'&H!$(!C'K
Pc'()HK'(&FO!&
O'$'$'F 'K!
$!'U
fRUWWRU
!$
XCK'(&g
hR(
N gggRCK'(&g
hR(
N
0
!"!#$%&'( )*"+,
-./0123 456.
78 9:;<=>?@;9=:8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888887 ABA CDECFGHFIJKLKMNLKFOJFOKLFEKOMNOPEHCFELKOMCEFMENJBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA ABQ CEFRHSLGDJJNETBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBQ ABU CEFRHSLVFSNLKFOBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW ABW JKLKMNLKFOJFOKLFEKOMCEFMENJFEMNOKXNLKFOBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW
Y5Z[. 456.
L\]^_A`AGabcd_\ecNf_\Gg_hijihC^\kV\klDe_Gbmm\fnBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBU L\]^_A`QSako_kciak\^XakikpNf_\BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW L\]^_A`U Jicip\ciakJakicafikp\klE_gafcikpE_qbif_m_kceBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBr
!"#$$ %!&#'()*+
,-$+.!"#$/0#/0$(/!%%1%#203%!/*4
!"#$#%&$#
'"
'#$
#'%&'(
$#'%
%
&"
)*+,-+.+/0.+12-12+.13+2/02456713.+2/831/309:--58;*0,<66246=6>1764.1731=+460=6*+?>6.1 912+.139+.+/0.+12960,@36,024?124+.+12,1A07731=0>1@.>+264+2.*6B+20>C2=+312962.0>D970?.56713.E )*6--58*0,<66273670364+2?12A13902?6F+.*G6?.+12HIJKIEL1A.*68@<>+?56,1@3?6,M146024M+.N 1AO12/P60?*912+.13+2/36Q@+36962.,EG6?.+12HIJKIEL,.0.6,R :0;S*6290T+2/.*6A+24+2/,36Q@+364<N7030/307*:I;1A,@<4+=+,+12,@<,6?.+12:0;1A G6?.+12HIJKI13F*620417.+2/09+.+/0.6426/0.+=646?>030.+127@3,@02..17030/307*:H; 1A,@<4+=+,+12:?;1AG6?.+12HIJKJU.*6A1>>1F+2/36Q@+36962.,,*0>>077>NR :I;)*67@<>+?0/62?N,*0>>0417.036713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309A13.*6?*02/6, 9046.1.*6731V6?.13?124+.+12,1A731V6?.07731=0>U0417.64+213463.19+.+/0.613 0=1+4,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*662=+312962.E)*636713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309,*0>> <646,+/264.162,@36?197>+02?64@3+2/731V6?.+97>6962.0.+12EB13.*1,6?*02/6, F*+?**0=6<66236Q@+36413+2?137130.64+2.1.*6731V6?.0..*636Q@6,.1A0 36,712,+<>60/62?N1307@<>+?0/62?N*0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+12<N>0F1=6320.@30>36,1@3?6, 0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U.*0.0/62?N,*0>>U+A,136Q@6,.64<N.*6>6040/62?N130 36,712,+<>60/62?NU7367036024,@<9+.073171,6436713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309E :H;)*6>6040/62?N,*0>>,76?+AN.*6>1?0.+12024?@,.14+021A.*641?@962.,131.*63
90.63+0>F*+?*?12,[email protected].*636?1341A731?664+2/,@712F*+?*+.,46?+,+12+,<0,64E :<;W7@<>+?0/62?N,*0>>731=+46.*0.960,@36,.19+.+/0.6130=1+4,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*6 62=+312962.036A@>>N62A13?60<>6.*31@/*7639+.?124+.+12,U0/366962.,U131.*63960,@36,E M124+.+12,1A731V6?.07731=0>90N<6,6.A13.*+236A6362?6441?@962.,F*+?*04436,, 36Q@+3649+.+/0.+12960,@36,13U+2.*6?0,61A.*60417.+121A07>02U71>+?NU36/@>0.+12U13
1.*637@<>+?731V6?.U<N+2?137130.+2/.*69+.+/0.+12960,@36,+2.1.*67>02U71>+?NU 36/@>0.+12U13731V6?.46,+/2E
:?;83+13.1.*6?>1,61A.*67@<>+?36=+6F763+14A130430A.62=+312962.0>+970?.36713.13 9+.+/0.6426/0.+=646?>030.+12U036,712,+<>60/62?NU1307@<>+?0/62?N*0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+12 1=6320.@30>36,1@3?6,0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U,*0>>6+.*63,@<9+..1.*6>6040/62?N ?197>6.602446.0+>64763A13902?61<V6?.+=6,A139+.+/0.+12960,@36,F*+?*F1@>404436,, .*6,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*662=+312962.+462.+A+64<N.*636,712,+<>60/62?N130/62?N *0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+121=6320.@30>36,1@3?6,0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U1336A63.*6>6040/62?N.1 0773173+0.6U3604+>N0=0+>0<>6/@+46>+26,1336A6362?641?@962.,EW2N9+.+/0.+12960,@36,
!"#$ %!&#'()*+
,-./01123145625357289:.:5;2,<48,0.6257289:4;5857289:=5>087?-;0,30910484>2; 851-;56;2,4-;92,5@@29123.:1=2<;4?291,=566.260/012314/25,-;2,A=09=/01075120/<591, 14;2,4-;92,A=09=5;2,-.?291141=2,151-14;:5-1=4;01:4@B58332@0801048,5<<6095.6214B1=51 57289:CD4/<6058924;84894/<605892.:5;2,<48,0.6257289:4;57289:=5>087?-;0,3091048 4>2;851-;56;2,4-;92,5@@29123.:5<;4?291A01=1=51;2E-0;2/281,=56684160/011=2 5-1=4;01:4@1=2;2,<48,0.6257289:4;57289:=5>087?-;0,30910484>2;851-;56;2,4-;92, 5@@29123.:5<;4?291B4;1=25-1=4;01:4@1=2625357289:B145<<;4>2B948301048B4;328: <;4?291,5,<;4>0323.:1=0,30>0,0484;58:41=2;<;4>0,0484@65AC F=2GGHIA066,2;>214349-/28194/<605892A01=534<123J92;10@023/010751048/25,-;2,1=515;2 @4;/-6512314/080/0K20/<591,5,,4905123A01=@-1-;232>264</2811=51A4-63.25994//435123.:1=2 L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658C
NOPQRSTUVWXYZZ[R\
F=2I;4?291948,0,1,4@5,<290@09<658B7282;56<6585/283/281BK480874;30858925/283/281B583]DI 5/283/28114,=5<21=26583-,258332>264</28148^B_`^59;2,CF=2I;4?291948,0,1,4@1A494/<48281,a ^b1=2L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658cLdMLIeL<290@09I658b94>2;087^B_fg59;2,583gb1=2948>28104856 K480875;2594>2;087h59;2,CF=2948>28104856K480875;250,32,9;0.23,15;108748I572ijg^4@1=0,,291048C k41=4@1=2,25;25,948,101-121=2l<;4?291m@4;<-;<4,2,4@DdnMB.-15;232,9;0.23,2<5;5126:.264AC Xopqrstuq[vstXwsxyzyxQ{t|
F=2L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658948,0,1,4@^B_fg59;2,5830896-32,^Bifg59;2,9-;;2816:K4823lI}j^B LdM}~IBmh_59;2,4@1=2L585.;026H0>2;583]4,D2;;014,D=58826B58359;2,564871=2,4-1=25,12372 4@1=29-;;281I}j^.4-835;:CF=0,j59;25;250,1=2;2,-614@5.4-835;:53?-,1/281.21A228]4,M87262, 583;5872D4-81:1=51A5,5<<;4>23.:1=2649565;25@4;/5104894//0,,04808g^gB.-182>2;-<3512308 I}j^CF=2<;4<4,23L<290@09I658A4-63;2<65921=2^hffL4-1=25,1M;25}2>264</281~/<;4>2/281I658 cI}j^bC
]583-,232,07851048,A4-630896-32aL087625/06:H2,03281056BG-610j5/06:H2,03281056BG4.0624/2,B D4//2;9056j
207=.4;=443BG023,2D4//-801:D4;2BG023,2G5;085B~83-,1;056BI-.609B<28L<592 583H29;251048BD45,1565.0151J216583,JH29;251048BD=58826JG5;085J512;A5:BH07=1j4@j5:JD561;58,B 583}23095123H07=1j4@j5:c841.-061bC
]583-,2,1510,109,5;2<;4>032308F5.62^j^Ck-0634-14@1=2L<290@09I6585,;2>0,23-832;1=2H23-923 ~8128,01:M612;8510>2A4-635664A5141564@Bi3A266087-801,BgBih`B_f,E-5;2@2214@ 94//2;9056J2/<64:/281-,2,B583if=4126;44/,C
!"!#$%&'( )*"+,
-./01232456781.97:;1.4<1=>?>=@0.AB.ACD9146EE.;F GH>97>AI@;5J1=7>5AK17LA=;1.91
M
NNOPQRSTUQUUVWQXYP
ZNUQPYU[RQXTPPQ[RY
\N]
N^
_`WQRT[QPSUWQVTYQXPSVRSQRS[
N^
OVQXXXVQSRP[PT
N OVSXVSXR
\
O[QVY[[[QPSWWR
Z\
a^b
\cdN\
efO_\g
WR[Xd
\cWR[U`h
[hc
i[gZ
^
O\NZ
Obc
g
N j
c
O
Oc
NNTP\
O
U\
O
OZNbZ^gZ
^
kZO
j
g^h
Whc
k
\
\OOObNb[QPY[\
Oa[`[QPSW\
OMcc
O
\b\NQMc\c\NZ
Oc
TP\
ObM
M^O
U\
ONc
OZc
OgZ
^d
W`T\
Oc
\j
Nl
cM
c
i[gZ
^gZ
j
bc
\b\Nh
mnoppqrqsnrsrtuvuwxqvupuyuzunr{s|rtu}~uq|qyon{xto{puuys~zunr{ronpovp{pu{qnxqpuyqnu{ rtuvuovuonxz
uvs|~vsurpu{qn|uorxvu{rtortouzqrqorqnu||ur{s qyqrqz~vsuzunr{qnyxpu
untonupvsopo
qyuonp~upu{rvqonsnnurqqr}}}urqsn{qu{onp}~uqoypu snpqrqsn{~vsrur{unqqu{onpvuwxqvu{un{qrqupu{qnopounrrsuryonp{zovqno{onporuvo{ }}}urqsnqvp}o|uvuorzunr{vupxu{qz~or{vuyoruprs qvp{
oppvu{{qnrtuqnruv|ou
uruunrtuuryonp{o{u{{unrqoy
qvpto
qroronpxv
onx{u{mru{ro
yq{tu{vqruvqo|svyqtrqnyonp{o~qn
onp|oopurvuorzunr{rszqnqzquyqtr~syyxrqsnqnnorxvoyovuo{onp qvp{rvqu{tu~vs~s{up}~uq|qyon
oy{su{ro
yq{tu{ouryonpsn{uvorqsnonpsnqrsvqnxnp}}}urqsnrs~vu{uvuonpvu{rsvu uryonp{onpvuwxqvu{uryonp
x||uv{|svpuuys~zunropounrrsuryonp{}}}urqsn ¡5A¢1A7>5A.0£5A>AI:;1.
tuvuzoqnqnnqnuovu{s|yonpqnrtuvsurovuopqvuryu{rs|rtuovqnoq{roovovu~vs~s{uprs
uu¤rvorup|vszrtu¥snqnpu{qnorqsnonpsnuvruprssnunrqsnoysnqntq{ovuosxypnsr u
qnyxpupqnrtu~vs~s{up}~uq|qyon¤q{rqnyonpx{u{qnrtq{ovuoqnyxpu{qnyu|ozqytszu{onpo|qvu {rorqsntu~vs~s{upyonpx{u|svrtq{ovuoo{puruvzqnup o{upsnu¤q{rqnsnpqrqsn{onpsxyp
u
pu{qnorup{qnyu|ozqyvu{qpunrqoy¦snupuuys~zunrq{qnrunpup|svrtq{ovuoonpns~t{qoytonu uoppqrqsnoypuuys~zunrqnrun{qrsvvupuuys~zunrq{u¤~uruprssxv§oyyu¤q{rqnx{u{qrtqnrtq{ ovuoovuu¤~uruprsvuzoqn
snunrqsnoysnqnpu{qnorqsn¨¦{qnyu|ozqyvu{qpunrqoyo{ts{unrs usn{q{runrqrtrtu
u¤q{rqnvu{qpunrqoypuuys~zunr¦snupuuys~zunrq{qnrunpupqnrtq{ovuo©qunrtorrtuu¤q{rqn qnrun{qrs|puuys~zunrq{nsru¤~uruprstonu
xqypsxr~vsurqsn{|svrtunqnuovusnunrqsnoy
snqnovuoo{{xzunstonuqnnxz
uvs|puyyqnxnqr{sv~s~xyorqsnxqypsxr~vsurqsn{|svrtuovuo ovu{tsnqno
yu
!"#$ %!&#'()*+
,-./01234567068956-/:5696;<=0-
>?9@896;4567068956-/:5696;AB2:560
C
DDEFGFG
HDIIII
HJDKL
MNIOIGFNIOIGF
DP
E Q Q
D E Q Q K
EGG
ER
SETH
U
1VWXBYZ>4,[Y4<,\Y]
^_`abcd`efgb`ghicjf_`ickf_`gif`lm`cnf_`ohfpcnqcjmr`ge_sogthncbjhgsuhf_hjqcivjm`t`iockjfp gjlwcbl`bhjmxbgjm`ockjfpy^_`gb`g`jecz{gii`i|s}~|geb`igjlecjihificnf_`gb`gickf_cnf_ fb``fs`gifcnr`ttntcu`brckt`gbls`gifcnf_`qcjmr`ge_gbhj`fglhkzgjlvtgzhfcirgplceisickf_ cnoctcbglcfb``fsgjljcbf_gjlu`ifcnqcjmr`ge_iickf_`bjwckjlgbpy^_`qcio`bbhfcio_gjj`tgjl gj
gwbh`th`bbkjf_bckm_f_`abcd`efgb`gfcugblf_`vtgzhfcirgpgjlagehnhexe`gjgjlgb`hjetkl`l gi{gbfcnf_`abcd`efgb`gy
`mhcjgtgee`iifcf_`abcd`efgb`ghi{bchl`lwpjf`bifgf`}}gjly}bkji`gifu`ifsgjl f_`bkjijcbf_ickf_j`gbf_`jcbf_`gif`bj{cbfhcjcnf_`abcd`efgb`gyvticsfgf`ckf` hjf`bi`efiuhf_gjlbkji`gifu`ifhjfcf_`jcbf_`gif{cbfhcjcnf_`abcd`efgb`gsgjlf`bzhjgf`igif_ fb``fgtcjmf_`abcd`efijcbf_`bjwckjlgbpy
1V\,\<,\Y]Y]\,YB\]XBYB<YB<]\:<,\Y]
ovb`khb`if_gfgb`{cbfhjmcbzcjhfcbhjm{bcmbgzw`glc{f`lncbf_`ecjlhfhcjicn{bcd`efg{{bcgt f_gfgb`j`e`iigbpfczhfhmgf`cbgchlihmjhnhegjf`nn`eficjf_``jhbcjz`jfakwthe`ickbe`iocl` |~|yy^_`zhfhmgfhcjzcjhfcbhjmgjlb`{cbfhjm{bcmbgzhil`ihmj`lfc`jikb`ecz{thgje`uhf_glc{f`l zhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`ilkbhjm{bcd`efhz{t`z`jfgfhcjycb`ge_zhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`b`eczz`jl`lhjf_`s i{`ehnhegfhcjigb`zgl`_`b`hjf_gfhl`jfhnpf_`gefhcjb`khb`lgjlf_`zcjhfcbhjmgjlb`{cbfhjmf_gfzkif ceekbyjgllhfhcjsgb`i{cjihwt`gm`jephihl`jfhnh`lncb`bhnphjmecz{thgje`uhf_hjlhhlkgtecjlhfhcjicn g{{bcgtecjfghj`lhjf_`ay^c`nn`efh`tpfbgegjllcekz`jff_`ifgfkicnzhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`isg zhfhmgfhcjzgfbh_giw``j{b`{gb`li``^gwt`|y
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN4OC=PQOHC-RSTU
VWXY
Z
[V
\
WXZ]
^]
X
WY
VX]V
_^]WX^WW W^X
_^
]
X]
[
V
W
W`a
b
c
X
XY T
XVT
Z
WX^W
_^
Z]
]de]X
Zf^V
XWg
X
]
`Y
W]X^W]
_^
X
[Vg
h`
XW V
[W^X
g`]
WWX]V
W]
[X
^WX]
V
X]Z W^V
g
W]
[
g`
[Vc
XVXW VX
`YXV`Xi
fX
Y
g`]
VY
X^W
X
jX
^VXh
WX^Wf]
\
W X]V
X^] V
V
VXWV
`X]Z
_^Y
c]
X
XYWX^W
_^
[
de
]X
Zh^WX^Wf]
WX^WW WX]V
VXYV
_^
^X
]
WX^WX
Y[
YWg`]
`Y
W]h
WX^W
_^
VX]VX
]kXf
VXf
^g
XYWX^W
_^
X
h_^
X]Vg
V`X
[W
W
W
Z]
^YW
jX
W
Xh
X^W
WWX]VX
^] V
X V
YWX^W
_^
X
W
Y[
^
XV
XW
VW
Z]
VY
X^W
X
jX ^V
lcmh
^
WX^W
W[
X
\
W
VWf
X^W
W
W]
[V
[WX
W]
[V
[WX
!"#$
%!&#'()*+
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQR
S
TO
U
PQSV
WV
Q
PR
OQVO
XWVPQWPP P
WQ
PO
O
V
ROS
QW
WW
M
QWYPT
QZ
V
[Q
XWQRWT
WQPOW
WV
QLWO\
QP
]
L^ WO
_`aZRWV
WP
b`
Ncd
QcV
\R
PVQOT
R\V
QQWVT
Y
O
WOPQWPQ
Q
PQc
e
OSO
PT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVO
QYOQVW
PT
V
PQWPQ
VWQ
S
c
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOQS
Q
QSV
L WO
bghiP
Of
b`M
RP
TPWQ
O\YQROQP
T
UP
WYOPVWVR
Q PWQ
QWOR
VWOc
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVO WN_MPVR
Y
WPjQ
VWO
fQ
fQOfV
OQ
OQ
QVO
OQSVRYPT
V
PT
V
PV
TQVQ WR
Pc
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOS
[
Q
W
QRP
Q
QWY
Q
WR
T\V
WQV
PQWPQ
WRV
Q
\c
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOQ
TVPOQ
W
T
Q
VbdO
Q
VWc
e
T\PQWPT
VPOQ
QVOY
RM
j
VWQc
WW
M
QWYPT
Q
U
P
OP
QWP
P
PV
TO
TPQ
PV
TO
TPQ
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQR
S
TO
U
PQSV
WV
Q
PR
OQVO
XWVPQWPP PWQ
PQ
QOT
QSVTO
P
W
YZ
[P
OS
V
XW
W
WV
QLWO\
QP WO
] NY^
_QW
P
O
Q[^V
PQWPP PQVO
OQW
P
`WOMP
aWO
OQ_SV
RQaO
^Q
ROSMZ
Q
Q
\
V
QOa
POW
Q
PV
WOaW
OQ
T
R
a\V
\R
PV
WPQWP^
W
PQWP
PT
Q
U
P
OP
QWP
P
PV
TO
TPQ
PV
TO
TPQ
LMb
QWP
RaWO
R
S
TO
U
PQ
SV
WV
Q
PR
O_V
\S
`
TO
QVOQVS V
aWO
OQV OU
OP
QY
VS
_
R Q_POV
QSV
_
\
Q[a
T
`QO
\
OP
Q^
OR
\
OP
QVOa
T
R
a\V
\R
PV
QWP
RP
RP
R
PW
\^
V
QWP
R
aWO
Q
\S
`
TO
PV
TO
TPQ
PV
TO
TPQ
LMc
QWP
RaWO
QR
Q
O
TO
U
PQSV
WV
Q
PR
O_V
\
S
`
TO
QVO
P
V
aWO
OQV
ROS
R
WQVT
a P
V
QRV
aWO
YQ[^
QORV
QRWQVOa
TR
a\V
\R
PV
QWP
RP
RP
RPW
\^
d
WORO\
S
OQ_
OPT
VPOVQVOa
T
Q
PR
Pb^]efghY
Q
O
ZOW\
QW[RV
V
PVWP
O
^
dP\O
iQVOa
T
Q
PR
P
b^]efjY
Q
OZW\
QW[RV
^
V
QWP
R
aWO
Q
\S
`
TO
PV
TO
TPQ
PV
TO
TPQ
!"#$
%!&#'()*+
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQ
RSPT
OR
O
T
UT
V
QOWX
PX
O
QR
TYX
Z
W
[
UT
OXT
Q
X
SPT
TOX
RTWR
POXU
S Q
X
ORX
SPT
\O]^
OTRX
ORPOXTS
UR
SZ
X
ZR
QX
OPQ
RQ
RQ
R
QP
Z^
_
SPT
OWX
X
MQP
OY
QX[OXW
RQT
OXTS
U
O
QR
Q`^abNcd\
O
TePZ
OP]RX
^
_
R T
fRTWM
YRP
TMRQ
Y
Q
T[U
XQTOXTS
U
O
QR
Q`^abN`a\
O
TePZ
OP]RX
^
_
QT
OXTS
OT
OP
RP
TQ
U
XQTX
QX
O
TSP
WXdb
fO
Q
^
TOXTS
QO
WX
Q`^abN`d\
O
TePZ
OP ]RX
X
QX
PQ
T
^
X
OPQ
R
SPT
O
ZW
[
UT
QX
UT
UQO
QX
UT
UQO
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNO
P
QRS
QR
T U
QRS
VQ
PTW
VQR
XT
QT
RMQSY
RWZTU
T
S
[\
RSQW]R
YZ
SW
PT^Z\ X
XR
U
S
QR
_`
R
SZRWTSRZT
SRZQRT
RaZ
Q
XT
YS
XT
b
WT
YS
XT
RU
QR
ZTSRQcT
SR]
_ aT
YX
WT
XQ
RW
Y
b
W
US`T
RTSc
W
W
PT
SW
R
W
QRXT
R
XW
XU
S
Td
R
T
SWc
VQSY
RW`
XT
RTPT
W
S
W
R]
eW
R
S_
\ faZT
WQS
W
RPQS
eW
g`hijkZT
W
Td
eW
R^`\ZT
SWPSc
VQ
XY
R
Tc
RUSc
WS
WTS
RX
eWR_
Ra
W
cS
X
QW
SW
W
R]W
cS
UZWSQ
XW
WTR`
RYWSQ
ZcQ
S
Z
RW
SR
ZSWXYP
TQR
W]R
QWRS
WQS
Z
VQQR
X
PVQ
j
U
TWSR`
R
X
T
RTSc
X
R
RQT
U
S
WQ
jW
T
R
US
SR W
XT
b
W`
XQ
RW
Y
b
W
US
YP
j
US
WT
US
UWR
WT
US
UWR
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNOPCQHRCKSH=TUQV=KTU
WX
YZ
[\]Z^_`]
a_
_]`
a_
bY
Z
a_
_ _
[\
]_^cd
_
]e
Y_
Z]
c\
b
Y
_Y]\_]Z^^_Y_
]ZY
]
Y
Z
^fgZ_`
^_]h\
^_Y_
]ZY
]
]\_YZ
i_f]`a_^
_
Z
^]
j
kl\]Y_]
a
^_Y_
]ZY
]la[`YZ
_
Z]
_ [
]\
[\
b
YaflW]
Za
f
\
_]aY Z
]
[\
a_
l
`Y`bZ]
Y_[
]
]
Y_]Z\^c[_
`
c
_]
Y]h
YZ]
Za
f]`]
a
c\
c
]
Y]c[_]^
c]
gZ
h\
b
Y
_Y]\_
]
\
]
a_
b
Y
]a
]
Y]
Y_]Z
Y]
\^]cY]Z_[\
d
dh
`Y
_
a
Y
]
]^_
c\
b
Y
_Y]\_^
Y]f
]`
d
dh
\
]ZY
`
]c\
b
Y
_Y]\_]Z^
_]c
gZ
]c
_]j`
k\
Y\
a_
aY]
`
a[
a_h
YZ
[\
]Z^_`]
a_
_]
\
]ZY
`
]
b
Y
_Ym
a_
Y\
a_
aY]
Y\
a_
aY]
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+'
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LM
NO
PQROSTUR
VT
TRU
VT
WN
O
VT
T T
PQ
RTSXY
T
RZ
NT
OR
XQ
W
N
TNRQTROSWOR
NT
S[\OTU
STRT
RQRONQWR
NTU
OR]^Q
WOR
NT
RQTS
ORQ
\ORU_`a[
RU
R_
RaWOR
N
OR
NbcUQ
TY
N
N`cUQ
VR
SRNX_Ma
YWOR
N
OR
N`dcMUQ
RQ
X_ea YfWOR
N
OR
Nbc`UQ
T
Y
N
N`eMdcUQ
L
T
NX
_baP
T
R
U
O
Q
TU
RTN^Q
W
NRQTS
R
V
NRWOR
NTP
R^
UP
T
V
N
R
RST
XQ
TNRQT
RO
TR UP
T
R
QS[N
U
TNLR
PT
R
ONQR
USgN
RNROTPQ
TNS
TL
LNR_
RX
YX YfX
h
RT
Ra^[X
TNX
h
RUQSRQTNOQ
Y
V
NRTSgQNV
RQ
^
UQ
TN
R
Q
TRNT[VST
O
RUPQ
Y
XQ
TN[
R
TRPQXPQNORS
V
S[Q
[
Q
RON
NR^Q
T
NROTPQ
TNS
NRQTNO
iR
ST
R
U
R O
VR
T
Q
TXR
TNX
R
N
UQSjR
T
T
XRNQ
OTX
NO
TRX
T_k[
OaX
TL
RV^
Q
RON
U
RNV
WOR
NT
RXQ
W
N
TNRQT
V
V
NQ
NQ
VT
VNR
Q_`aT
NR[
ROQlRQV
S S
UQ
R_OR
NbcUQ
TY
NaX
Y_
OR
N`dcMUQ
RQ
X
Yf
_
OR
Nbc`UQ
TY
NaXQ
NO
PQ
ROSTUR
VT
TR
Q
RON
U
R
W
N
TNh
VT
NQ
VT
VNR
NQ
VT
VNR
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
MOPMQRP
M
SQ
TUVWP
N
M
NMPNX
Y
XZP
YN
YRM
[
\]
^M
Y
XNRN
MQR
M
^
_PXQP
M
YN
OP
`
R
NRMPNMQX
Y
RP
RP
YN
YRM
PSQN^
XNMPX
RMQR
N[P
RMQRNMPNX
RNZ^
a^
R
[RMQRR
MO
bOM
^SQ
O_M
QXN
_X
_PMQRPb
M[XNMPNX
M
QZ
RY
M[P
SQN^
XNMPNM
YN
N
`
RM
R^RR
QR
`
RRMP
M
Y
XNRN
MQR
M_P
`R
P
M
YN
`
R
Y
M MQY
a c
RMP
M
RM[
P
MQR
^
M
`
R
NRa
YN
RP
YN
YRM
RP
YN
YRM
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+',
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
O
PQR
S
PST
UV
WO
X
R
VRPOVRQ
P
QR
PQ
QRP
RPYV
S
Z
POV[
U
UV
VP
RO Q
W
VW
RPQRWO
TY
\
UV
POV[
P
[V
S
]QRRP
V
O
SVY
PQVRPQRM
V
P
^
_QV
`RU
MP
WORPQR
RRPOV
]Q
VRPQR
]Q
WS`
[V
WYO
VT
QSV
PWRP
YOQSR
Pa
PZ
_O
RPQRR RPOV
R
VPT
RPQR
]Q
PO
P
R
YTSP
U
R
PbYV
S
cPO
X
RP
Z
_O
RPQRR RPOVR
]Q
P
PO YVR
OP
R
[Y RPQRM
V
P
QR
P
P
MU
R
PbYV
S
c
QV
X
RPQRZ
_RPQRPOVRQYOdeS
S
P
P
O
P
RP
feS
SVO
P[
P
R
[TO
S
VT
TRZ
O
PQR
S
P
X
R
VR\
UV
RO
UV
URP
RO
UV
URP
Md
UVST
UV
XR
XQP
RVY
P
O[SP
RVPQ
RP
V
YO
PV[Wg
V
Ph
RV
QP
WO
X
R
VRPOVPQ[
O
R
V
PO
X
RYV[
P
PO
V
PO
X
RaP[QSO
VOPOV[
OeZfSMR
V
PO
SO
O[ZOPYQV
PQOP
VO
P
PQV
`
PQ
SSRVOV
UP`R
O
PTS VOb
`
VTeZdSMR
V
PcZ
UVS
T
UV
XR
XQP
RV
Y
PO[
SP
RVPQ
P
RP
V
V
YO
PV[
X
R
VR\
UV
RO
UV
URP
RO
UV
URP
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
OPQPRST
R
PUV
WT
WXR
TPU
RYV
PTY
RY
ZQX[M
R
T
QTR
RVP[
OP
\V
R
RVP[
PT
P
RT
R
R\V
R
RVP
XT
XR
V
R
[P
R T
UV
RT
QT
RVP
RPORX
TPX
V
P QXP
RV
UP
R VU ]
TRQVX
RT
RO
T X
R
V
V[R\
OPQ
PRST
R
P
UV
WT
WXR
TP
U
R
W
T
PTS
OP
TV
OP
OTR
TV
OP
OTR
M^
V
RXT
Q[XP
RYV
W
T
PT
S
RX[
_ [XP
RVP
X[M
RT
QT[TVX
[
O
[`V
TV
OP
OTR
XT
R
RV
R
[P
R T
UVPO
RO
[PTPV[\V
[TVX
RVP
R
PORX
YTPX
V
P QXP
RV
UP
R
VU ]
TRQVX
RT
RO
T X
R
V
V[RYTPX
V
aVbRXQ
Rc
R\V
O
[TVX
YPUV TV
RYVP[
TPX
R
QV
PS
R R
R
QV
RPP
X
Q X
OP
R\
V
RXT
Q
[XP
R
W
T
PTS
OP
TV
OP
OTR
TV
OP
OTR
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+',
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
OPQRPQ
Q
ST URVWX
SWQY
ZR[O
S[QR P
R
QS
QR\
V]Q^
__
VQ
OPQRPP\
Q
PR
_
QPSQ
PO
QS
Q
`P
_
`
PQ
a_
PQRPQR\
V]Q^T[OPRQ
OVV
Q
b
Q
Q _VS
P[V
P[VO
P
SVPQRPP\
QaV
Q
[V\P
O_
QTR[
T
P
RQ_
V
VPa
OP\
Q
PR
Y_
O[T
QR ZR
c
d
PQM
PO
QR_[S
SVZR[O
S[Q
[
\S
O_
P\
Qa RY
_
\PVO
QQ_[S
Q
R[_
VRS
Q_\
O[
a R
eP[RQSRO
WfO
Q_[S
RPQRPY
_
Q
PQ
[Pa_
O_
Q SPgh
Q_[S
OP
ZR[V
P
T_Qg
O[ifMO
\[QY
PQRP
Q
[
P\
Q
QP
O_
a
dQR\
V
SVZR[O
S[Q\
OV_
P\
Q
QY_
VR_\
O[
YQ_[S
QR
_
P_
\[
\PQ
O
_
QM SPgh
a_ZR[O
S[Q_[Q
\Q S[P[
R_Q
QT_
PQRPP\
QPR
P\
Q
Q
QR_
\
PQ_
Q PRa
dO[
O_
O
QY
SVZR[O
S[QY_[S
QR
_
P_
\[
\PQ
PQRPM
[
P\
Q_\
_
[
QRSVP\
Q
R_
QQ
a
_
_
VQ
O
PQRP
P\
Q
`
P
[Pb
\[
ZR[O
S[Q
P_
\[
\PQ
P_
\[
\PQ
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNKOH-=PHQRSO=KQR
TU
V
WX
WX
Y
Z[
\VX
[
[VZ
[]^_
[`
X
[aX
bV
[WTX
a[ZX
WVc
[VZ
`
[da
Y
Z
XZe
WX
[aX
a WXVZ
Z
faX
XZ\
`
Xd[
d
XZV
X[`
WXVa[ZX
[VZ
[c
`d\[
a
WXV`a
_d[
a
[
WX
WX
Y
ZfXaW
[V\X
W
[`Za[ZX
[VZ
gcdfVX
VZ
[
_a
afVX
X
\ X\
`ZXV[
a
X`
[`[ZX
[VZ
[a
X[`
Za
h[ida
W[`
[V
Tj
[aX\
X
\_a
_f
Y
Z
XZe
WX
X
VZa
Y
Zk[
Z
a[ZX
[VZ
[c
[VZ
`
[
Y
Z
XZe
WX
Za
WX
WZ[
Za
WX
WZ[
Tj
`d\[
a
[WTX a[ZX
WV
bV
V
[V
TUd[
a
[
WX
WX
Y
ZfXaW
[V\X
W
[
`Za[ZX
[VZ
da
_`
Za[X
bVa
_f
Y
Z
XZe
WX
X
a
`Xf
[Vlc
a\XZ
a
Z_`a
k[
[
Uc
`a
[
Y
ZXV
[WdX
d
a[ZX
[VZ
gZXV
X
Xida
_f
Y
Z
XZe
WX
[aX`[
h
[X
[
WdX
[d
[a
[ZX
[VZ
a[Z
fa
Z_`a
k[
[`
a\Xg
[id`V
l
a
lef c
[We
[
[e
a\Xe
a\e[
c
ac
_
[V\Z
`
a[ZX
[VZ
d
[
\_
a
[WTX
a[ZX
WXV`
_
_f
Y
Z
XZe
WX
Za
WX
WZ[
Za
WX
WZ[
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+'(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
L
MNO
PQMNPMQ
R
S
P
NS
TNO
O
NM
P
O
UN
O
NMVSORN
N
RP
SMNW NR P
S
Q
N
QWMR
N
RP
XP
N
PNR
NT
Y
RL
QL
MNPMQ
TX
P
NR R
N
PN
WRNSRXZ[NX
MNP
\]
^]
RNSR
RS
N
P
[OR
MR
XP
NQWPNR
NT
O
NM
P
RWOP
UN
O
NM
VSMORN
NXP
N
Y
R
XP
NR
MR
TXNL
RLP
_SMO
PNR
NT
O
NM
TX
P
MNPMR
RPM
RP
N
NSQP
P
WO
RP
TM
TRN
ORS
RL
LP
NR
OP
W[
M
RP
`
O
O
SNMWN
aPNRM
NSR
M
W
Q
ON
MRPNRM
NSR
NQW
PNR
NT
O
NM
P
RW
OP
UN
O
NMVSORN
NOP
S
OP
b
RP
NOR
OP
W
XNSRP
M
MWNL
L_SMO
PNR
NT
O
NMNP
RNSRRT
NZ
WM
N
NSP
XZQ
R
S
M
NXP
NLP
M
N PMQ
S
TR
QWP
W
WX
b
R
MRa
TM
L
OL
WNO
P
_SMO
PNR
NT
O
NMNP
TXPONP
PQMa
T
NS
R
M
L
L
P
TP WPNRM
NSR
cNd
MN
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
M
N
O
P
Q
PRST
U
SVM
PVMP
WSPMST
PXS
M
S
P PU
W
RU
WSO
VX
TOM
OR
Y
X
SXZ
QS
M
O[M
PMST
X
WR\M
PX
SORM
P[
[
ZN
SXN
P
S
][
VM
P
Y
XSW
PS
SV
MPXS
PWX
UM
OR
Y
X
SXZ
QS
PMSVPXP
S
Q
M
PM
PXS
PWX
X
PM
Q
S
Y
X
QS
P
Q
NWPVM
TWS
[
^[
VM
Y
XP
PUM
PXS
PWX
PMWS
T
SX
M
SX M
PU
M
PWX
PMWS
T
X
M
QS
Y
X[
_[
VM
O
PM
ZP
SXVM
MPXS
PWX
PV
PTS
MWX
TS
V
PTSOPW
OUM
OPMS
XSRM
O
R
Y
X
SXZ
QS
Q
VR
M
M
QS
Z
QS
Y
X`MR
QUSM
aWPWS
MP
PWMS
O[
[M
OS
][
VM
O
PM
P
SXV
M
PXS
PWX
PV
PTS
UM
O
R
Y
X
SXZ
QS
PMSV
OMPXS
PWX
PM
WSV
S M
WTSXVPS
VP
SXTOM
Ob
[M
PX
PWX
cPdMST
QP
TOM
OR
Y
X
SXZ
QS
WM
VSRSXPb
Y
X
SXePZ
QS
ePR
TcV
SXT
d`
OV
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+',
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNO
PQRQ
SQ
QOP
QR
MN
QST
PTN
P
QNS
UVW
XQU
N
U
Y
QSO
Z[Q
U
Q
QT
MT\[SU
QNS
NUSO [
Z[SUMQP
MQ
SQMP[X
]
Q
Z[UMS
Q[M
Q
SM
NPS
N QMS
Q[M
^Q_R
Q
YSP
MUN
QMS
Q[M
^Q_R
Y
U
O[QUN
QMS
Q[M
^Q_T
TN
XQNS
Y
NZ[SU
P[X
T
UQ[MN
P[X
M
QUO
N
S
U
`N
XQNS
MQ[
S
UN
NQMS
Q[M
TO
Y`SN
Z[Q[S
NQ
Q[NS
XT
T
M
aTN
XO
b
M
SMc
YS
QNS
M
dSe
YS
M[
M
M
ON
MXUN
fQ
Q
[
SQUMN
[S
M[
T
U N
Q[
SQYSP
N
USOSeQ]N
]cO T
QYcNQXcSMdOcMNgQ
gVTN
N
]cO T
QYcNQXcN
Q
Qc
hTN
T
N
NQONS
dUPSMed
ON
Y
Q^iMN
QPXjMN
QS
_UN
XQ ONS
QNSP
Y
R
NM
QONS
U
Y
QU
SMhQ
OQ`
SQ`NQMY
OQN
YSP
T [U
akY
OQNOM
h
SQN
UNQMS
Q[M
Q
MN
QSP
Y
RSY
OQ
QNON
OS
XQNSQP
Y
T
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNO
PQRS
QR
T
U
V
P
PQU
PW
X
SQPSM
T
N
RNP
MT
QPSM
R
MXPQR
QT
Y
QS
P
RXYP
ZQ
Y
QS[\YRQ
Q]P
Q
V
RR
TS
R\
N
NP
MT
QPSM
R
X
S
SR]WN
NPMT
QPSM
QM\
P
YS]
Q
QY\Q
MXY\
QRP Q
\RQN
YQ\MX
R\
QU
RPYP
YS]
Q
QPSM
R
Q\
P
X]S
MS
R
P
Q^
XY
RP
\MSRMX_
RPQRS
R
X_Q
SQ
\MSRMX_\P
S
QS
Y
SY
T
QXU
\S
_
XY
RP
TS
TRQ
`M\S
YS
QaN
NST
\Q
bN
YQ
SRYP
QRS
Q\R
MXP
X
QR
SQP
UP
X]
c
R
SRd
TS
QPSR
QST
\Q
S
YX
SQ
SQYP
Q\R
PR
M
QT
X
S]WN
NP
QST
\Q
SQPSM
RS\
M
R\
Q
YP
Q
QPSM
R
MXPQR
QT
Y
QS
P
RXYP
ZQ
Y
QS[\YRQ
Q]P
Q
V
RR
QST
\Q
SQN
MNS
Q
SQPXM
QST
MS
RS\
]
Q_
Q_YS
Q_
RT
SQ_
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%'
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMNOPQR
SOP
T
U
SOV
Q
LOVQR
VSWV
QS
SOPRMWOS
O
WX Y
ZYW
[X
\
M
SMT
US
OWS
Q[
URSOP]OPLRO
O
MUW
OSU
OVW
O[MSR
LQR[
OVW
Q
LS
WRO]OVOSU
[
OYW
QSXO
WSL
N
L[W
[X
\
M
SMT
US
^
Y
QMQW
URSOP]OP
LRO
O
MUW
OSU
O
OWSL
M
S
MORSXW
[Y
LY
QMQW
URSOP]OP
LRO
O
MUW
OSU
O
OWSL
M
SOW
L[M
S[
O
O
MS[QOY
MY
OL
OSU
OWSL
UO
W
QSXSMOQ
Q_`
[OQ
QW
M
O LS
MUWO^
SO
O
MW
OSY
aYW
[X
\
M
SMT
US
OWS
UOSU
LSOW
SOPS
O
RMU
OLS
YOM
SO
Q
ROWSL
M
L[OOSU
O
PMS
b
X
WbMS
MORS
M
OM
U
W
YW
USQOSU
LSOWSL
Q
L[SM
O
MMXW
O
c
MXW
S
OSU
RO
SOY
YW
S
UP
U
P
RMS
OR W
[ SO
M
dR
Se
Sf
ORMQ
O
O
MQWOMS
ORM
gO
!"#$
%!&#'()*+
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
L
MNO
PMOQRM
ONRMO
MP
S
TSU
R
O ULPM
OTPMTMR
MU
MO
MU
QR
MNO
NR
L
R
TSN
OR
MUO
VUOR
MULOTU
UOT
S
WM
WO
NRMOTN
UM
Q
ST
M
UXTOWOXUNU
NU
RMO
MS
NMWQ
RM
MO
YM
R
UXTOZMU
M
NR
TM
UO
[
MU
R
Y
MUO
MUORNO
\WOVR
NR
M
T
MURTX
XLR
L
OM
]XLOM
X
O
R
O
MN
STN
R
^
OV
MULX
STX
R
UXTO
RUM
M
TLPQ
M
MOR
M
MP]
NM
P
YMT
UT
M
V
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
O
PQR
S
PT
SUPQV
W
XY
ZRXR
P
OT
[
R
YRS
RO
XY
XY
[
RP
S
XY
QPO
QO
P
RS
YPOY
X
YPO
US
ROSWQYS
RO
YP
Y
YP
\S
ZRXPSX
VY]Q
PSR
^]O
O
RUSO
_P
S
PY`QSRP
Pa
O
YPOYP
O
[
R
YROP
OP
XQYPT
O
RO
YRYPQY]YV
P
QY
XQPYU
PQV
P
O
PSR
Q
MPQVRX
P
O
YYRYPQY]Y
V
P
QY
ORQPV
Y]bS
O
Q
PQSR
a
O
XRO
YRY
Y
YRY
PQR
P
PRX
QQ
MPQVRX
PTO
S
PY
RO
YRY
Y
YRYPOYX
OQOUOY
URX
P
X
PYU
R
YUPSRQY
PQR
PQYO
URV
SYU
XYQ
aQP
SQ
PQVR
PO
XRUSO
PRX
POYV
YS
QYO
RO
YRY
c
Y
YRYTR
]O
RPQRR RTOP
XYQ
PRX
PP
]O
O
UPSRQY
PQR
PT
QPO
YS
X
Y`QUR\
`^a
SPSR
TO
O
[
RPOYV
WQ
S
RXUT
S
PY
SRT
RV
P
YRV
T
O
P
RY
PQ
PaO
PQR
POYV
S
SRQ
PX
PU]O
XVYR
PU
QRY
PRO
PO
YPTQROPO
P
YP
QU
QP
SQYPU
YS
X
PUT
QY
T
O
YRQP
PUa
SQP
PUP]Y
R
O
PQR
TOPQR
POYV
RP
O
USO
U
UV
P
TP
STPS
TZRO
T
O
]PO
Y
VUO
UP
R
a
O
PQR
S
PT
SU
PQV
W
XY
ZRX
R
P
O
[
R
YRc
XY
RO
XY
XRP
RO
XY
XRP
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNO
PQR
SP
T
PTUV
USVW
X
V
YO
YO
VZV
[W
VZ
O\
W
SZ
VW[TO
ZSW
Y
VUO
PY
P[W
]TP
Y
VZT
M
PTUVY
P^U
O_
ZP
P`aW\
U
O_bY
ZP
P\
cT
_
Z
P
PVXW
de
VW
X
V\W
X
V
OV[TO
VZ
Y
V[W TO
V
SW
Z
POVW
OVO
TMVO
eW
Y
V[TO
WY
WP
TWSWOVY
PWVTO
Y
POS
VW
OVO
UOVT
PTV
PW
Z
POVW
OVO[TO
eW
Y
V[TO
V
PT
Y
\
PY\
b
VYY
VVW
OVO
b
UOVT
PTV
P\
VUO
\
[TO
VY
SPTVW
PTV
PW
U
POf
S
PV
\P
OVU
e
O
PQR
SP
T
PTUV
X
V
OVb
YO
VW
YO
YVP
VW
YO
YVP
MgS
YO
WP
P
T
YO
YVO
PWO
WP
TO
PTV
P
Y
P
W
PTV
Z
PeW
VTO
PWOU
US
]TOZ
VW
OPVP
[W
P
VP
P
T
OPeW
PWOP
ZWV
Z
YOTW
PZV
Z
PTV
P
VY
TVPTV
ZS
VYSW
P
V
TP
X
V
VPZV
PTV
Pe T\W
PWOVT
PT SZYOU
Z f [P
P
Y
OVPW
X
V
hWPVO
iZW
YOTZ
PTV
PWSU
VT
TVPTVh
]TP
W
ZO
OUS
W
PU
TP
V]T
ZPZV
YOT
V
eW
[OP
ZSP
VZOP[W
VTO
PTV
PP[TO
U
]T
T
ZS
VT
]TPZZVPTVY
T
W
PTV
Z
P
X
V
OVb
YO
VW
YO
YVP
VW
YO
YVP
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNOMP
QR
STO
N
MO
OMNOM
UMV
MV
NW
XT
S
Y
MZ[\P
]ONTSOT
NO^M
NTXMOXT
MOYM
TN
TMNYS
N
N
W
ON
O^XM
NOM
NM\[_ZP`
ST
N
^
SV
M
NMWT
M
TNabTONSYT
PT
cXT
SYT
NdeTO^
T
NXf
Y
NM
ST
MN
V
MWcT XT
T
X
cTMON
SMNTOX
^
f
XcT
T
NP
NVST
N
XM
g
M
N
X
V
NTX^
MN
P hTabTONS
NMV
TO
NSV
M
NM
g
M
XMi
VX
MT
VX
VMN
MT
VX
VMN
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNOPQR=FSQTFPQR=FUVS5Q-W=CHSXYZ
[
\]^
_
\_
`]a
`a
b
^\c[
][
\
^_
ad[
b
^
a^e
`a
\[a\]f
[\
`
a
\
gh[
i_
^[
`a
`^\
_i
`
a^
\_[
`a
\
c[^\
j[
\
\[af
fi`
a
_
\a^
^
c[
[
^^
i_
\
a\gh
Zklmjnd
^
_`
a
\ o
[\
`
a
\
^
\j
_
^p
`
a^
\
a
\a ]
c
_
[
\
d[
b
^
a^\[a
_\a
\a\
\
ad\
q]
d\
_
[\
j
_^\
_]
\_^a
`\d[
b
^
a^\[a
a
^
\ac[
`\[
^
^
c[\
a^
^i
q]\g
a_
_r^]f\^
\
ad
as
t]ai
a
d
^[
d^jha^
\a
e
a
^]
\[af
\
_
]a
\
^
^
c[
a^f
c\
]a\
[
^
a
_
j
[
\]^
_f]a
\d
^]
[
^
a
d
\]ad
i_acY]
[
^
\d_id\[af
`
[
i_
^[
`a
`^\
`
^[ a\
^`
\[`
f ^
a
j
[
\]^
_
\
b
^
a^e
`a
^[
`a
`^\
^[
`a
`^\
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQP
RS
S
T
R
UQ
VPS
R
OW
R
WXVY
SP
QPZ[\V
PSWT
R
RPSRRUX
PVQW
VQ
ZV
PS
RP
R
PVQW
UQS
WX]SQO
U
Q
O
PQ^
V
PSQOV
UQSPVQW
PS
V
O
_RSWPR
P
Q`
aZV
P
QP Qb
cSQX
Q
` bc
aV
QRW
UPV
RXZ
P
Z
V
RPX
P
d
Q
PSVQ
W
Q
eP
R
WX
Z bc
ZV
QRW
U
PV
RXeSQP
RO
]SPOV
UPV
RPPO
OSV
RPS
^
S
RU
P
T
R
QRd
UQ
RV
UQ
URP
RV
UQ
URP
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNO
P
QRS
T
U
QTVWRU
Q
QRS
QXP
Y
S
USZ
[U
QPUS
RP
TU\
Q
SQ
Q
TUWR
Q
QRS
Q
QPU
[
P
VT
SP
[U
[SQ
\PS
VTP
T
SP[
Q
Q
]
^P
Y
S
USQPU
UT
T
QW
RU_
`
TW
Y
S
UX_SUR
`X[
QPX
TUQW
NS
UQ_
`
SR
]P
W
XS
X
Q
UT
U
QPUW
S
R
S
S
\P
RP
QaRUV
QSbQ RU
cdeO
UT
T
RUU
fX
Scghi
_QW
`]
^P
Y
S
USQPU
US
Q
S
T
U
Q
SZQ
S
RP
W
XS
X
Q
UTU
\Q
SR
]P
SS
U
Q
SZQ
PUW
ST
WVP
UT
T
RWUS
UP_
`]U
W
QPU
W
T
WV
NS
T
UQR
[Q
N
S
T
\j
R
P
SQR
[QTU
QR
[QS
T
WV
]P
W
XS
X
Q
UTU
\Q
SR
QPUW
S
R
S
S
\P
SR
UT
V
UP
Q RU
hik
cihlk
UT
T
RUXU
fX
ScgOh]_
`]
^[
STP
SS
T
QUQ
WVP
Y
S
USQPUW
[
P
VT
SP
[U
[SQ
]
UVXSSQ
T
U
\Q
[UQP
[
[
STW
S[
QP
VT
SP
RU
T
VR
]
P
QRS
T
U
Q
Y
S
USZ
[U
SP
[U
[SQ
SP
[U
[SQ
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNOPQF=RHSQTUFVT-W=XYTHC-QZ[
\
]^_
`
]`a
bc
bc
d
_]
^\
^\
]
_`
ce\
a`
_\]c
]^\
`cf
b
]
`^ca
`^
`
c
g
ha
bc
bc
d
_\f^c
_
i]]
`_c
]f\
^\
]
_`
c
j
^kc_
b
l\]c
\
mnZ_\
] o
\c`^a`^
]o`]^_\`c
] ^mnZ_\
]o]
_k
a
a`
_\
^kc_pq]
r
ha
bc
bc
d
_\f^c
_\
`^]
]`
a`
_\s]
]
_`
]\fa`f\_
b
]
f
_
ka\
mtu]
c`
]\c`^a`^
]o`\]
]
]
_
kcf\
`c]o
]
]_k
a
`
_\
^kc_pq]
r
v
]mtwxu
mt[uxt_\
]yv
mtwun_\
]y
v
mtz[wn_\
]r
ha
bc
bc
d
_\f^c
_\
`^]
]`
a`
_\s]
]
bcpaj
mtw[l`f\_
b
]f
_
ka\
mtu]
c`
]\c`^a`^
]o`\]
]
nw_\
]\
`c]o
]
_k
ka
`
_\
^kc_pq]
r
\
]^_
`
k^c
]
_\
bc
b_]
_
f\
d
_
c_{
bc
_\
bc
b_]
^kc_pq]
]
_\
bc
b_]
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
O
PQR
S
PST
UV
UV
W
RP
QO
QO
P
RS
VX
W
R
VRPY
UV
PSQRO
W
RPOV
P
M
P
RSOT
VT
OTQVRPQ
TSO
MP
SM
P
PT
R
T
TSO
ZPPT
[O
T
VT
OTQVRPQ
TPOV\
PQ
TS
RO
Q\VR]^P
S
U_
UV[
O
PQR
S
\QV
P
W
R
VRY
UV
RO
UV
URP
Q\VR]^P
P
RO
UV
URP
M`O
W
R
VRY
UV
S
RO
UV
UV
W
RO_QV
\
R
\TO
QO
P
RS
VPOV
aQPO
bV_\
PRO
cd_ORVP
^
SV_
PRO
PR
ZPR
P\
V
SV
RVRPPdSO
P
VP
QT
S
Q\VR]^PX
POVR
VT_OPQR
PRO
[
VR
_O
bV_\
PRO
cPOV\
P
O
OT
VT
OTQVRPQ
T\
R
V
QP
PQMN[
O
PQR
S
\QV
P
W
R
VRY
UV
RO
UV
URP
Q\VR]^P
P
RO
UV
URP
MeO
W
R
VRY
UV
XRO
X
RPQRR R
S
RO
UV
UV
W
RO_QV
\
R
\TO
QO
P
RS
VPOVR
V_M
R
UV
f
g\
P
R
Pf
Pg
_O
P
RU
W
RX
U
S_
aQVT
QS
QR
Y
R
R
_OVRP_
aQP[
O
PQR
S
\QV
P
W
R
VRY
UV
X
RO
X
PQR
R
RO
UV
URP
Q\VR]^P
P
RO
UV
URP
Mh
PQ\ S
UV
VRPS
UV
W
RP
O
PQQ
i
fP
S
O
TjPQV
i
P
VgO
UV
URP
POV
U
W
R
VRP_OPQ_
P
P
VP[
Q
UV
VRP
RO
UV
URP
RO
UV
URP
RO
UV
URP
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,'
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
O
PO
POQ
RS
T
O
UOV
WU
V
VXU
V
X
WU
WOV
XU
V
V
VOUQ
W
X
YV
V
VOU
X V
VYQU
Z
VQQ
[
\V
P
X
R]VQU[
V
U^_XVPO
VXUOQ
VQY
V
V
UV Y
U
VPQU
UOZ
WOQ
UV
Q
V_
O
PO
POQ
R
T
O
UO`
WU
OX
WU
WOV
QZUOabV
V
OX
WU
WOV
cd2efgChiMj
VQO
P
US
S
`ZQU
VP
WU
T
OV
ZRX
QX
V
OP
US
VXUZ
W
WU
UV
OX
Q
S
US
OVQOSX
R
Y
`
WU
VXUZ
V
ZU
P
kQOOV
U
X
PUY
VQUOVQOM
U
V
l
m
VQOOWRVU
X
R
XQVZ
Y
nn
RXQ
R
oN
Q
RSV
OZ
X
R]VQO
UO
_
VQOV
XZ
Q
RV_
mU
UOZQV
VO VQO
kQ
QObV
P
YX
UR
QPU
V_
mR
kQ
VQOXV
V
O
VXUZ
O
VPVP
ZU
P
ZRV
MW
QV _
mOb
UVUO
VPVP
ZU
P
ZRV
M
V
W
O
V_
m
VQOPOVXUZ
X
QU
V
VZUVX
ZRX
RP
OX_
VQO
P
US
S
`
ZQU
V
T
O
UO`
WU
OX
OX
WU
WOV
OX
WU
WOV
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
OPQ
RSPT
RU
VT
W
Q
XP
T
VSTOYZ
W
Q
TQ[
VT
OZT
O
VS TUOO
T
O
VS
QO
T
Z
OQV
O\Z
]P
T
VOZT
]Q
^\NQZ[O
Y_ZQOZ
TVZQQPO
QZ
PT
RU
QT
O
TQOPQ\
R
]PT
VO_PT
]Q
ZOZOT
YT
V
Z
OOPQZQT
OY
]
TOV
STOY
T
T
O
O
T
VOZTS
PO
\
Z
OPQ
R
SPT
O
W
Q
TQ[
VT
QZ
VT
VQO
QZ
VT
VQO
M`
OPQ
RSPT
R
W
QOVTZ
VT
R
_
POTPO
_ZN^ R
RU
]O
O
TPO
YZ
U_
[
VT
OZT
QPOQT
Q
P QPOQTUOZ QTP
OVS
TUOR
T
QORVS
SU
POT
QV
O\Z
T
QPOQTUOZTS
OP
Z
U
R
QZ
VT
VQO
R
V_
OZT
O
Z
VST
VOU
SU
O
TPO
_PT
S
T_abc
PZ
U
dae^
f
aN
c
PZ
Z
de^
afY_ZQ
Z
T
O
OgO
U
Z
Q
PT
TVS
QO R
Q
O
TPO
\
Z
OPQ
R
SPT
O
W
Q
TQ[
VT
QPOQT
QZ
VT
VQO
QZ
VT
VQO
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,
-./012345672138743 9123:8;
<=
>
?@A
B>
B?C@D
@?>
?
E
AF>
GB
A>?D@
>
GH?BA
B
AD@
>
I
?@D
?@
<JK>
G?>D
L
M@?L@
G>ND?
I?>
C?B
O@
ID
AB
?@
=PQD
?F?
A
B
CG
DB
I APQ
?OKF?@
A>
?@
A?
B>
K>
?CD?>
A
@?
@
=PQ
O@> L
?CD
?>
L
M@?
C
N > BA
I
?
BAD
?O@
>
BA
A?B
N
ID
@?>
?
E
AK
BA
I
?
BAD
?A?G
>
E
A
A?>DC
AD@
F>
I
?F>
=PQ
M@?
GK>
GH?B
?>DC
@
C?
>
M@??@
GK
? ?
N>?
NA?@AFA
?
?O@
B
M?C@D
F>
AI
?B
M?
?O@
B
?I@?K>
ID
B?AD
D
N
A@D
I
?
><BNGAO@?K
?AD@
CG@D
G>
?
O@
B
F
ND@F>
DCG>
KBAB
?
AD@
N>G>
DAC
B?
GCD
>
>C@D
? @
K>
GND@?
> BAB
?B@
A?@AR
A@
B
?
IA
B@
A?@ASB>
?
I
?
B
?@
<JK
?@A
B>
B?C@D
GB
A>
A>
ID
IA?
@CDATU?
?
A>
ID
IA?
<V?
B>
?@C
O I
D
INB
ID
E
A?
>N@D
C
A
CG>
F?
<
ABBA?@
G
?>DC
CG>
E
A
DAW
ID
ID@
>
E
AH?
DBA
?
A?
N>
GB
A>@
D?BDX
?A?
>
?
D?
@G
@
D?
BG?
AB
I
?F
A?GF
I
?B
BA
?
A@D
A
?F
DA@>@BA
EA
>C
?K>
BA
?@
GB>
B?
ID
E
AC
A?
@
>
?>DA@
DG?BDBV
>@
D
?
BG
E@?
?
I
?D?GA>XK
>
BA?@
G?>DC
I
CG>
@CDATU?
K
G
B
?FA?@AB
I
?F
?D?>DC
D
?@A
BC@D
K
?
B>
?@C
O
I
D
INB
ID
E
A?
E
A
DAW
ID
A>
ID
IA?
@CDATU?
?
A>
ID
IA?
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-.
/01
2304
/2
54
6
1/7
804
3
1
397
:
6
1
41/;
54
/
/74<
2-/7
9 /7
92
178
1/0127
21
5
/4
348=7
248
21
5
/
214
/1/9
1/2
7
/743
140
7
9>/2
17/?@A
BCDEFGHIDFJKLMNOPFQRSLMTOR GFE
0
3<
U -VW
/30
/A
/01/
4
/
0
308781044
/:87/073
/4
?39
/@4
=7/073
17804
3
/
878
704
/
/7
70-4
204
X78/30
17804
75
84
204
/
70/4
X
7
730
17804
75
8704
/
70/4
=7/
0804
3
20
70
92
17
4
5
4?
@
2-/7
130/2
54
/=
YZ[\F]^O_`aLbM`^c\bdeIOEF_M]G^b`RSEA
/01/
4
/
0
308781044
/:87/073
/4
?39
/@4
=7/073
17804
3
/
878
704
/
/7
70-4
204
X78/30
17804
75
84
204
/
70/4
X
7
730
17804
75
8704
/
70/4
=7/
0804
3
20
70
92
17
4
5
4?
@
2-/7
130/2
54
/=4
5
49:7
/1
104
/4f
87
248
5
/A
Y
297
8/30
1728 4
204
/
704
:7
4204
/
704
=
Y
297
/073
172
4204
704
:
4204
7
70
4
/=
Y
f
7
/419
7/
/
4=
Ygh[\JMSaO LbM`^ceG^\FLO A7/
/1804
i0
7
248
5
/A
Y
297
730
172
/7
70-
4 204
704
:
/7
70-
4 204
8704
/=
7
/01
2
10
9
/
6
1
41;
54
17
54
51/
0341W</
/
17
54
51/
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,-
.
/01
2345
61/
7/57
82
157
38
31
15957
8
27
/57
382157
38
31
15957
:
.;<=;>?@ABC DEFG@HIBCJK >LM13
36257
N51/72
O
3M
.
6/5
1145
61
O
6
7/957
8
31
15P95
7
:
.
3514
1957
:
.
345
1957
3
13
15P957
3 157
:
QLR SFATKCUFBV;WXYZ[TAH\BI]C^A_R`BIKCR >Aa
.X=F>?b=@AL?CcFdBeIF?D@ef;[CaAfF>?gaAcIL>?eFR`ah
3563
73
5
452126577
3821
3514
37
i403j7
:13514
61257
4
3
212157
3
31
1597
/57
k
1
2345
61257
1O
27
/57
3
1
537
k
1
145
61257
1O
215
7
3
1537
:13
5257
4
/5
15
0/
61
7
O
7i
j:
7
O
7081
36657
37l
21
/72
O
3M
.
/01
2345
61/2 7
/57
3
157
81
7/57
3
15
7
:
.
/01
145
61/
157
31
15957
82 157
3
31
15957
:
.
/01
3514
61/
7/57
157
8
7/57
1
15
7
3:
.
l
1
3760
13
3 7:
.bY=mFBT>nBTKCD;>?@ABC h13
36257
N51
/72
O
3M
.
/01
145
61/
7/57
8
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-.
./01
2/1
3 ./1
3
./1
34 1
2/1
-3
./1
3
./1
5
6
27.
-/.8
9.2
12/1
3
-.
./01
2/1
3
./1
341
2/1
-3
./1
3
./1
5
6
27.
4-8/
9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3
-.
./0/1
341
2/1
-34./1
-3
-.
./0/1
5
6:;<=>?@AB CD?EFGHIF=JCB K.-
-94/1
L/
.
214
M
-N
6
27.
4-8/
9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3
-.
./0/1
341
2/1
-34./1
-3
-.
./0/1
5
6
27.
-8/
9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3
-.
./0/1
3
12/1
3.
./1
-3
./
1
5
6HO<PQRG=JSFBTEACD?EFK.-
-94/1
L/.
214
M
-N
6
27.
-/.8
9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3
./1
3
./1
3
12/1
3.
./1
-3
./1
5
6
U2.
-197
.-
-
15
!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,(
-.
/01
2304
/2
54
6
1/7
804
3
1
397
:
6
1
41/;
54
/
/74<
2-/7
9 /7
92
4 178
1/0127
21
5
4/
348=
-/7
9
/741070
>?@
38 7
54
92
4 17
92/7
20
27
5
A@
9
7
92
4 1721
2
7 /3
B0/
C0/1
7
1D5=
EFG
/C=@
?.
4=
2 /=E?HAF=.D@ =7
212
0/140
7
/1
5
/
2
348=
27
9I/21
7/1
7/1/
2
3487
2304
/
7
417/
/34
2/
130
/2/7
:7
6
1
41/745
207
341
4987 /
/0=
JKLMNOPQ RSQTUPNVOWXYZ[XM\WN ]^N_`a[ NW
QTUPNVOWXb
297
730
17275
42
04
:8704
/:
/7
70-0
4
:75
4204
:7
704
/:
704
=
JZZLcdeYMNOPQ RSQTUPNVOWXb7/
/1804
C07 704
/7
730
17=
7
/01
2
10
9
/
6
1
41;
54
17
54
51/
0341f</
/
17
54
51/
-H
/01
2
/2
54
6
1/7
804
3
1
397
:
6
1
41/;
54
/
/74
1/01
4=7
1/01
4/743
5
397
92
17
0341 f</
=7
1/01
4/74
29
1/0170/:01<0
/:5
4
/2704
/:
<
/:
8<
54
/:
/2
9
1
0/2
//
194/=7
1/01
4/74
737
0/27
591/015
714/
0
<70/=7
4/74/
C071/011 1
4 7
248
/0
01/0115
/:871
/743
/10
7
-
12
1; >
Jg
3/01270-214
/
5
9214/:017/ 24
/:
04
89
5
15
/
C01 /2
7
/01
2
/
6
1
41;
54
17
54
51/
0341f</
/
17
54
51/
!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./
0-12
2
13
4
/1
5-
1 6
5 -5
-.
/
0-12
2
15
1
-27--/
2
8 39
/-
7:1--
5
1
-27-
-/
2;
<=
27-
50
520
-7
.
25
/1
>
-20?71
:
-
:.0
90
.
1201>1.
5.
2:1
1
0.2-1
/
2
0
2-
5<20
57
-:7
-2.
>
-<1
-2
2
5-1
23
0
/0
12
2/1
27.92
5
:
1?90
5
220
-:757
27-
2:71
5
/
7:1-
/1
27
1 0
1
57
27-
2-2.7
@
/
2
0
<A9
<=BC9
<DBC90
>
-27
.
90
>
-
1-20172
2:1
52
.0
1-:
520
7
123
0
27
.201:
/?
/
:.0
15
2
23
201-7
520
-:72
1
/
7:1-
/1
:2
E72
F72-
0
-8/3
G=B
2F3;
HD
13
5 23GHCA=3D8;
902
9 0
27
.201
-6
0
-2
12
<A9
<=BC9
<DBC
5-1
20
:71
/1
1-
?0
.
5
-0
F7
.
E-257-0
/1
2I
520
:1230
5 27
.2012:
-
1?0
/
G=BH8;
.0
1-:
/25
1?30
27
.2012
50
1
0
1/-
5
1 50
-
2-
?0
27 .
0
E0
-2
-
0
5 27
.
3
0
/0
27 .02:
9
>
-
1-20172
2:1
52
.0
520
7
123
5 12
-02
-
0
>
-
1-I2520
.
9
12
201
.0
.
0
5
:.
12
7
:.0
.
12
27150
520
527
.3
1201.-
0
520
.
50
520
0
27-
50
52-7
.
2
.5
-0
-0
/1
/-2
7:1-J@2
2
-0
/1
/-2
!"!#$%&'( )*"+,-
.
/0
12/3
4
5
6
.782.9
1/.2
2 2
./305
/ 0
.2
:
47
5/2 4
5
2./2
. /0
172
:
4
54/259
.02
354
5182 /
/0
!"#$% &!'#()*+,-./,0!"#/12 /)!&3#425&!1+6
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix B Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
Appendix B:
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy
Supporting Documentation
CalEEMod Inputs - 6700 E. Pacific Coast Highway Mixed-Use Project, Construction Name: 6700 E. Pacific Coast Highway Mixed-Use Project (Congressional Project) Project Number: COLB-09.3
Project Location: 6700 E. Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach County: Los Angeles County
Climate Zone: 7
Land Use Setting: Urban
Operational Year: 2025
Utility Company: Southern California Edison, SoCal Gas
Air Basin: South Coast Air Basin
Air District: South Coast AQMD
South Coast AQMD SRA: 4
CalEEMod Land Use Inputs
Project Components Size (dwelling units or 1,000 sqft) Gross SQFT Footprint (SQFT) Acres Landscaping (SQFT) Construction
Apartments Mid Rise1 281 Units 315,713 103,696 2.38 21,707 Health Club2 4.0 4,000 0 0.00 0
General Office Building3 1.6 1,600 0 0.00 0
Strip Mall4 3.1 3,100 0 0.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces5 16.1 16,060 16,060 0.37 0
Recreational Swimming Pool 0.8 773 0 0.00 0
Enclosed Parking Structure with Elevator 267.7 267,687 0 0.00 0 TOTALS 608,933 2.75
Notes
1 The Apartments Mid Rise land use includes the entire building's footprint. All other land use building footprints are therefore zero. 2 Health Club land use represents the proposed residential fitness space. 3 General Office Building land use represents the proposed residential lobby space. 4 Strip Mall represents the proposed retail space.
5 Other Asphalt Surfaces includes all proposed hardscape, including riverfront pedestrian improvements.
Demolition Debris1 Soil Haul1
Component Amount to be Demolished (Tons) Construction Activities Volume (CY) Asphalt Demolition Debris Haul 325 Site Preparation 8,200 Building Demolition Debris Haul 1,195 Grading 0
Total 1,520 Total 8,200
Notes:
1 CalEEMod default used for haul truck capacity and trip distance.
Appendix B Page 1
Architectural Coating SEASP EIR MM AQ-2
Percent Painted Water Exposed Area
Interior Painted: 100% Frequency: 2 per day
Exterior Painted: 100% PM10: 55 % Reduction
CalEEMod Default: Residential PM2.5: 55 % Reduction
Interior Paint VOC content: 50 grams per liter
Exterior Paing VOC content: 50 grams per liter Roadway Dust CalEEMod Default: Non-Residential Unpaved Vehicle Speed: 25 mph Interior Paint VOC content: 100 grams per liter Clean Paved Road: 9 % PM Reduction Exterior Paing VOC content: 100 grams per liter
CalEEMod Default: Parking
Interior Paint VOC content: - grams per liter
Exterior Paing VOC content: 100 grams per liter
Structures Land Use Square Feet CalEEMod Factor2 Total Paintable Surface Area Paintable Interior Area1 Paintable Exterior Area1 Non-Residential Structures
Racquet Club 4,000 2.0 8,000 6,000 2,000
General Office Space 1,600 2.0 3,200 2,400 800
Strip Mall 3,100 2.0 6,200 4,650 1,550
17,400 13,050 4,350
Residential Structures
Apartments Mid Rise 315,713 2.7 852,425 639,319 213,106 852,425 639,319 213,106
Parking3
Other Asphalt Surfaces 16,060 6% 964 - 964
Enclosed Parking Structure with Elevator 267,687 6% 16,061 - 4,015 17,025 4,979
2 The program assumes the total surface for painting equals 2.7 times the floor square footage for residential and 2 times that for nonresidential square footage defined by the user. 1 CalEEMod methodology calculates the paintable interior and exterior areas by multiplying the total paintable surface area by 75 and 25 percent, respectively. 3 Assumes that all parking and non-parking asphalt will be striped. CalEEMod methodology assumes 6% of surface area is striped.
Appendix B Page 2
Building Demolition*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.42 9.77 18.50 0.03 0.41 0.11
Off-site 0.07 0.45 1.16 <0.01 0.04 0.01
Total 0.49 10.22 19.66 0.03 0.45 0.12
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities.
Asphalt Demolition*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.22 5.07 9.62 0.02 5.16 0.81
Off-site 0.13 5.56 2.69 0.03 0.41 0.16
Total 0.35 10.63 12.31 0.05 5.57 0.97
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities.
Site Preparation*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.42 9.77 18.50 0.03 0.10 0.07
Off-site 0.22 9.54 4.59 0.05 0.69 0.27
Total 0.64 19.31 23.09 0.08 0.79 0.34
Rough Grading*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.50 12.00 22.30 0.04 0.60 0.13
Off-site 0.07 0.09 1.23 0.00 0.01 0.00
Total 0.57 12.09 23.53 0.04 0.61 0.13
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities.
Fine Grading*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.48 11.50 21.40 0.03 0.60 0.13
Off-site 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.01 0.00
Total 0.55 11.59 22.44 0.03 0.61 0.13
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities.
Utility Trenching*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 0.18 4.12 7.86 0.02 0.03 0.03
Off-site 0.03 0.05 0.52 0.00 0.01 0.00
Total 0.21 4.17 8.38 0.02 0.04 0.03
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities.
Unmitigated Construction Emissions (Max Daily)
*Assumed to not overlap with other activities. Calculated additional off-site emissions associated with 92 CY import of soil haul proportionally assuming the same factors as those used for export of soil haul (emission coefficients, trip distances, truck classes, and hauling capacity) and occurring over Site Preparation phase.
Appendix B Page 3
Building Construction*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2023
On-site 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28
Off-site 1.57 5.09 23.63 0.02 0.43 0.08
Total 2.70 30.89 72.73 0.07 0.72 0.36
Year 2024
On-site 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28
Off-site 1.50 4.39 25.41 0.02 0.43 0.08
Total 2.63 30.19 74.51 0.07 0.72 0.36
Year 2025
On-site 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28
Off-site 1.43 4.37 23.43 0.02 0.43 0.07
Total 2.56 30.17 72.53 0.07 0.72 0.35
*Assumed to overlap with Paving, Architectural Coating, and Landscaping/Finishing activities in 2025.
Paving*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2025
On-site 0.20 3.60 6.20 0.01 0.02 0.02
Off-site 0.03 0.04 0.44 0.00 0.01 0.00
Total 0.23 3.64 6.64 0.01 0.03 0.02
*Assumed to overlap with Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Landscaping/Finishing activities in 2025.
Architectural Coating*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2025
On-site 17.63 2.34 2.33 <0.01 0.09 0.08
Off-site 0.27 0.31 4.43 0.00 0.05 0.00
Total 17.90 2.65 6.76 <0.01 0.14 0.08
*Assumed to overlap with Building Construction, Paving, and Landscaping/Finishing activities in 2025.
Landscaping/Finishing*
Maximum Daily (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Year 2025
On-site 0.21 5.11 9.44 0.01 0.03 0.03
Off-site 0.05 0.06 0.87 0.00 0.01 0.00
Total 0.26 5.17 10.31 0.01 0.04 0.03
*Assumed to overlap with Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coating activities in 2025.
Appendix B Page 4
Maximum Daily Emissions - Including Overlapping Activities Construction Activities ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Building Demolition (2023) 0.49 10.22 19.66 0.03 0.45 0.12 Asphalt Demolition (2023) 0.35 10.63 12.31 0.05 5.57 0.97 Site Preparation (2023) 0.64 19.31 23.09 0.08 0.79 0.34 Rough Grading (2023) 0.57 12.09 23.53 0.04 0.61 0.13
Fine Grading (2023) 0.55 11.59 22.44 0.03 0.61 0.13
Utility Trenching (2023) 0.21 4.17 8.38 0.02 0.04 0.03
Building Construction (2023) 2.70 30.89 72.73 0.07 0.72 0.36 Building Construction (2024) 2.63 30.19 74.51 0.07 0.72 0.36 Overlapping 2025 Activities
Building Construction (2025) 2.56 30.17 72.53 0.07 0.72 0.35 Paving (2025) 0.23 3.64 6.64 0.01 0.03 0.02
Architectural Coating (2025) 17.90 2.65 6.76 <0.01 0.14 0.08 Landscaping/Finishing (2025) 0.26 5.17 10.31 0.01 0.04 0.03 Total 20.95 41.63 96.24 0.09 0.93 0.48
Absolute Maximum Daily Emissions 20.95 41.63 96.24 0.09 0.93 0.48 South Coast AQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Maximum Daily ON-SITE Emissions - Including Overlapping Activities On-site Construction Activities ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Building Demolition (2023) 0.42 9.77 18.50 0.03 0.41 0.11 Asphalt Demolition (2023) 0.22 5.07 9.62 0.02 5.16 0.81 Site Preparation (2023) 0.42 9.77 18.50 0.03 0.10 0.07
Rough Grading (2023) 0.50 12.00 22.30 0.04 0.60 0.13
Fine Grading (2023) 0.48 11.50 21.40 0.03 0.60 0.13
Utility Trenching (2023) 0.18 4.12 7.86 0.02 0.03 0.03
Building Construction (2023) 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28 Building Construction (2024) 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28 Overlapping 2025 Activities
Building Construction (2025) 1.13 25.80 49.10 0.05 0.29 0.28 Paving (2025) 0.20 3.60 6.20 0.01 0.02 0.02
Architectural Coating (2025) 17.63 2.34 2.33 <0.01 0.09 0.08 Landscaping/Finishing (2025) 0.21 5.11 9.44 0.01 0.03 0.03 Total 19.17 36.85 67.07 0.07 0.43 0.41
Absolute Maximum Daily Emissions 19.17 36.85 67.07 0.07 0.43 0.41 South Coast AQMD LSTs (SRA 4)* N/A 57 585 N/A 4 1
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
*Assumes 1 acre of disturbance per day and 25 meters to closest sensitive receptor for a conservative assessment of localized impacts.
Appendix B Page 5
Construction Activities and Schedule Assumptions
Construction Activities Phase Type Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Duration
(Workday)
Building Demolition Demolition 7/3/2023 7/28/2023 20Asphalt Demolition Demolition 7/31/2023 8/4/2023 5 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/7/2023 8/18/2023 10 Rough Grading Grading 8/21/2023 10/6/2023 35
Fine Grading Grading 10/9/2023 10/20/2023 10
Utility Trenching Trenching 10/23/2023 11/17/2023 20
Building Construction Building Construction 11/20/2023 11/14/2025 520 Paving Paving 10/25/2025 11/14/2025 15
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/1/2025 11/14/2025 120 Landscaping/Finishing Trenching 7/8/2025 12/22/2025 120 Construction Schedule
Appendix
B Page 6
Maximum Daily Summer (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Mobile 1.71 1.42 16.30 0.04 1.39 0.27
Area 11.20 4.22 29.60 0.03 0.34 0.35
Energy 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 0.13
Total 13.01 7.28 46.63 0.08 1.86 0.75
Maximum Daily Winter (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5 Mobile 1.68 1.55 14.80 0.04 1.39 0.27
Area 7.74 3.96 1.69 0.03 0.32 0.32
Energy 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 0.13
Total 9.52 7.15 17.22 0.08 1.84 0.72
Maximum Daily TOTAL (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5
13.01 7.28 46.63 0.08 1.86 0.75
Maximum Daily ONSITE (lbs/day) ROG NOx CO SOx Total PM10 Total PM2.5
11.30 5.86 30.33 0.04 0.47 0.48
Unmitigated Operational Emissions (Max Daily)
Appendix B Page 7
Construction Only
Appendix B Page 8
Appendix B Page 9
Appendix B Page 10
Appendix B Page 11
Appendix B Page 12
Appendix B Page 13
Appendix B Page 14
Appendix B Page 15
Appendix B Page 16
Appendix B Page 17
Appendix B Page 18
Appendix B Page 19
Appendix B Page 20
Appendix B Page 21
Appendix B Page 22
Appendix B Page 23
Appendix B Page 24
Appendix B Page 25
Appendix B Page 26
Appendix B Page 27
Appendix B Page 28
Appendix B Page 29
Appendix B Page 30
Appendix B Page 31
Appendix B Page 32
Appendix B Page 33
Appendix B Page 34
Appendix B Page 35
Appendix B Page 36
Appendix B Page 37
Appendix B Page 38
Appendix B Page 39
Appendix B Page 40
Appendix B Page 41
Appendix B Page 42
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
1 / 40
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report
Table of Contents
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
1.2. Land Use Types
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
Operation Only
Appendix B Page 43
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
2 / 40
4.3.2. Unmitigated
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
4.8.1. Unmitigated
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Appendix B Page 44
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
3 / 40
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Appendix B Page 45
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
4 / 40
5.15.1. Unmitigated
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
5.16.2. Process Boilers
5.17. User Defined
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
5.18.2. Sequestration
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Appendix B Page 46
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
5 / 40
7. Health and Equity Details
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
8. User Changes to Default Data
Appendix B Page 47
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
6 / 40
1. Basic Project Information
1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Congressional Project v2
Operational Year 2025
Lead Agency City of Long Beach
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.30
Precipitation (days) 18.4
Location 33.752985167477334, -118.10744812295178
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Long Beach
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4767
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Long Beach Gas & Oil
App Version 2022.1.1.7
1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Mid Rise 281 Dwelling Unit 2.38 315,713 21,707 0.00 832 — Appendix B Page 48
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
7 / 40
Strip Mall 3.10 1000sqft 0.00 3,100 0.00 0.00 — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
16.1 1000sqft 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Health Club 4.00 1000sqft 0.00 4,000 0.00 0.00 — —
General Office
Building
1.60 1000sqft 0.00 1,600 0.00 0.00 — —
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
268 1000sqft 0.00 267,687 0.00 0.00 — —
Recreational
Swimming Pool
0.80 1000sqft 0.00 773 0.00 0.00 — —
1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected
2. Emissions Summary
2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 6.21 13.0 7.28 46.6 0.08 0.50 1.36 1.86 0.51 0.24 0.75 151 15,973 16,124 15.9 0.25 19.0 16,616 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.53 9.52 7.16 17.2 0.07 0.48 1.36 1.84 0.48 0.24 0.72 151 15,716 15,867 15.9 0.26 4.96 16,347 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.59 11.6 3.66 35.2 0.05 0.19 1.36 1.55 0.20 0.24 0.44 151 11,139 11,290 15.8 0.25 10.8 11,771 Appendix B Page 49
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
8 / 40
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.84 2.12 0.67 6.43 0.01 0.04 0.25 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.08 25.0 1,844 1,869 2.62 0.04 1.79 1,949
2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.90 1.71 1.42 16.3 0.04 0.02 1.36 1.39 0.02 0.24 0.27 — 3,908 3,908 0.18 0.15 14.4 3,972 Area 4.12 11.2 4.22 29.6 0.03 0.34 — 0.34 0.35 — 0.35 0.00 5,121 5,121 0.10 0.01 — 5,127 Energy 0.19 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 6,829 6,829 0.48 0.04 — 6,852 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 21.6 115 136 2.22 0.05 — 208 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 129 0.00 129 12.9 0.00 — 452 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.59 4.59
Total 6.21 13.0 7.28 46.6 0.08 0.50 1.36 1.86 0.51 0.24 0.75 151 15,973 16,124 15.9 0.25 19.0 16,616 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.88 1.68 1.55 14.8 0.04 0.02 1.36 1.39 0.02 0.24 0.27 — 3,743 3,743 0.19 0.16 0.37 3,795 Area 0.46 7.74 3.96 1.69 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.32 — 0.32 0.00 5,029 5,029 0.09 0.01 — 5,034 Energy 0.19 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 6,829 6,829 0.48 0.04 — 6,852 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 21.6 115 136 2.22 0.05 — 208 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 129 0.00 129 12.9 0.00 — 452 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.59 4.59
Total 2.53 9.52 7.16 17.2 0.07 0.48 1.36 1.84 0.48 0.24 0.72 151 15,716 15,867 15.9 0.26 4.96 16,347 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 50
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
9 / 40
Mobile 1.86 1.67 1.57 15.3 0.04 0.02 1.36 1.39 0.02 0.24 0.27 — 3,788 3,788 0.19 0.16 6.24 3,846 Area 2.53 9.86 0.45 19.3 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 0.00 408 408 0.01 < 0.005 — 408 Energy 0.19 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 6,829 6,829 0.48 0.04 — 6,852 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 21.6 115 136 2.22 0.05 — 208 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 129 0.00 129 12.9 0.00 — 452 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.59 4.59
Total 4.59 11.6 3.66 35.2 0.05 0.19 1.36 1.55 0.20 0.24 0.44 151 11,139 11,290 15.8 0.25 10.8 11,771 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.34 0.31 0.29 2.78 0.01 < 0.005 0.25 0.25 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 627 627 0.03 0.03 1.03 637 Area 0.46 1.80 0.08 3.52 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 67.5 67.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 67.6 Energy 0.04 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 1,131 1,131 0.08 0.01 — 1,134 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.58 19.0 22.6 0.37 0.01 — 34.4 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.4 0.00 21.4 2.14 0.00 — 74.9 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 0.76
Total 0.84 2.12 0.67 6.43 0.01 0.04 0.25 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.08 25.0 1,844 1,869 2.62 0.04 1.79 1,949
4. Operations Emissions Details
4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use
4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 51
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
10 / 40
Apartme 1.69 1.52 1.26 14.4 0.03 0.02 1.21 1.23 0.02 0.22 0.24— 3,469 3,469 0.16 0.13 12.8 3,525 nts
Mid Rise
Strip Mall 0.21 0.19 0.16 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 0.03— 440 440 0.02 0.02 1.63 447 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.90 1.71 1.42 16.3 0.04 0.02 1.36 1.39 0.02 0.24 0.27— 3,908 3,908 0.18 0.15 14.4 3,972 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
1.67 1.50 1.38 13.2 0.03 0.02 1.21 1.23 0.02 0.22 0.24— 3,322 3,322 0.17 0.14 0.33 3,369 Strip Mall 0.21 0.19 0.17 1.66 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 0.03— 421 421 0.02 0.02 0.04 427 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appendix B Page 52
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
11 / 40
General 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Office
Building
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.88 1.68 1.55 14.8 0.04 0.02 1.36 1.39 0.02 0.24 0.27 — 3,743 3,743 0.19 0.16 0.37 3,795 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
0.30 0.27 0.25 2.47 0.01 < 0.005 0.22 0.22 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 557 557 0.03 0.02 0.92 565 Strip Mall 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 70.5 70.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 71.6 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Health
Club
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.34 0.31 0.29 2.78 0.01 < 0.005 0.25 0.25 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 627 627 0.03 0.03 1.03 637 Appendix B Page 53
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
12 / 40
4.2. Energy
4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 3,003 3,003 0.19 0.02 — 3,014
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 89.5 89.5 0.01 < 0.005 — 89.8 undefine
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — 118 118 0.01 < 0.005 — 119
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 55.9 55.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 56.1 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 41.6 41.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.7 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,440 1,440 0.09 0.01 — 1,446
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 4,748 4,748 0.29 0.04 — 4,766 Appendix B Page 54
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
13 / 40
Daily,——————————————————
Winter
(Max)
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
———————————— 3,003 3,003 0.19 0.02— 3,014
Strip Mall———————————— 89.5 89.5 0.01 < 0.005— 89.8
undefine d———————————— 118 118 0.01 < 0.005— 119
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Health
Club
———————————— 55.9 55.9 < 0.005 < 0.005— 56.1
General
Office
Building
———————————— 41.6 41.6 < 0.005 < 0.005— 41.7
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
———————————— 1,440 1,440 0.09 0.01— 1,446
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
———————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total———————————— 4,748 4,748 0.29 0.04— 4,766
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
———————————— 497 497 0.03 < 0.005— 499
Strip Mall———————————— 14.8 14.8 < 0.005 < 0.005— 14.9
undefine d———————————— 19.6 19.6 < 0.005 < 0.005— 19.7
Appendix B Page 55
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
14 / 40
Other — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9.26 9.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.29 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 6.88 6.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.91 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 238 238 0.01 < 0.005 — 239
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 786 786 0.05 0.01 — 789
4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
0.18 0.09 1.58 0.67 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,000 2,000 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,006 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.0 12.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club
0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 54.9 54.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.0 Appendix B Page 56
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
15 / 40
General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.19 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,080 2,080 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,086 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
0.18 0.09 1.58 0.67 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,000 2,000 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,006 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.0 12.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.0 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club
0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 54.9 54.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 55.0 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Appendix B Page 57
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
16 / 40
Total 0.19 0.10 1.64 0.73 0.01 0.13 — 0.13 0.13 — 0.13 — 2,080 2,080 0.18 < 0.005 — 2,086 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
0.03 0.02 0.29 0.12 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 331 331 0.03 < 0.005 — 332 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.99 1.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.99 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Health
Club
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 9.08 9.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.11 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.15 2.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.16 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.04 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 344 344 0.03 < 0.005 — 345
4.3. Area Emissions by Source
4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 58
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
17 / 40
Hearths 0.46 0.23 3.96 1.69 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.32 — 0.32 0.00 5,029 5,029 0.09 0.01 — 5,034 Consum
er
Products
— 6.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
3.65 3.41 0.26 28.0 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.03 — 0.03 — 92.2 92.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 92.5 Total 4.12 11.2 4.22 29.6 0.03 0.34 — 0.34 0.35 — 0.35 0.00 5,121 5,121 0.10 0.01 — 5,127 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.46 0.23 3.96 1.69 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.32 — 0.32 0.00 5,029 5,029 0.09 0.01 — 5,034 Consum
er
Products
— 6.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 0.46 7.74 3.96 1.69 0.03 0.32 — 0.32 0.32 — 0.32 0.00 5,029 5,029 0.09 0.01 — 5,034 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 57.0 57.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 57.1 Consum
er
Products
— 1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt
0.46 0.43 0.03 3.50 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.5 10.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.5 Appendix B Page 59
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
18 / 40
Total 0.46 1.80 0.08 3.52 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 67.5 67.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 67.6
4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use
4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.1 107 127 2.06 0.05 — 193
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.44 2.28 2.72 0.05 < 0.005 — 4.17 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.45 2.35 2.80 0.05 < 0.005 — 4.30 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.54 2.82 3.37 0.06 < 0.005 — 5.17 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.09 0.47 0.56 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.86 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.6 115 136 2.22 0.05 — 208 Appendix B Page 60
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
19 / 40
Daily,——————————————————
Winter
(Max)
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
——————————— 20.1 107 127 2.06 0.05— 193
Strip Mall——————————— 0.44 2.28 2.72 0.05 < 0.005— 4.17 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Health
Club
——————————— 0.45 2.35 2.80 0.05 < 0.005— 4.30
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.54 2.82 3.37 0.06 < 0.005— 5.17
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
——————————— 0.09 0.47 0.56 0.01 < 0.005— 0.86
Total——————————— 21.6 115 136 2.22 0.05— 208
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
——————————— 3.32 17.7 21.0 0.34 0.01— 32.0
Strip Mall——————————— 0.07 0.38 0.45 0.01 < 0.005— 0.69 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Health
Club
——————————— 0.08 0.39 0.46 0.01 < 0.005— 0.71
Appendix B Page 61
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
20 / 40
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.09 0.47 0.56 0.01 < 0.005 — 0.86 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.58 19.0 22.6 0.37 0.01 — 34.4
4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use
4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 112 0.00 112 11.2 0.00 — 392
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.75 0.00 1.75 0.18 0.00 — 6.14 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.3 0.00 12.3 1.23 0.00 — 43.0
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00 — 2.81
Appendix B Page 62
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
21 / 40
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
——————————— 2.46 0.00 2.46 0.25 0.00— 8.60
Total——————————— 129 0.00 129 12.9 0.00— 452
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
——————————— 112 0.00 112 11.2 0.00— 392
Strip Mall——————————— 1.75 0.00 1.75 0.18 0.00— 6.14
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Health
Club
——————————— 12.3 0.00 12.3 1.23 0.00— 43.0
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.08 0.00— 2.81
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
——————————— 2.46 0.00 2.46 0.25 0.00— 8.60
Total——————————— 129 0.00 129 12.9 0.00— 452
Annual—————————————————— Appendix B Page 63
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
22 / 40
Apartme
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 0.00 18.5 1.85 0.00 — 64.9
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.29 0.00 0.29 0.03 0.00 — 1.02 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.03 0.00 2.03 0.20 0.00 — 7.12
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.01 0.00 — 0.46
Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.04 0.00 — 1.42
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.4 0.00 21.4 2.14 0.00 — 74.9
4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use
4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.52 4.52
Appendix B Page 64
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
23 / 40
Strip Mall———————————————— 0.04 0.04
Health
Club
———————————————— 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Total———————————————— 4.59 4.59
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
———————————————— 4.52 4.52
Strip Mall———————————————— 0.04 0.04
Health
Club
———————————————— 0.02 0.02
General
Office
Building
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Recreati
onal
Swimmin gPool
———————————————— < 0.005 < 0.005
Total———————————————— 4.59 4.59
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
———————————————— 0.75 0.75
Strip Mall———————————————— 0.01 0.01
Appendix B Page 65
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
24 / 40
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Recreati
onal
Swimmin
g
Pool
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 0.76
4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type
4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type
Appendix B Page 66
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
25 / 40
4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 67
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
26 / 40
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type
4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 68
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
27 / 40
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Appendix B Page 69
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
28 / 40
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
5. Activity Data
5.9. Operational Mobile Sources
5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 427 427 427 155,899 4,336 4,336 4,336 1,582,734 Strip Mall 52.6 52.6 52.6 19,190 550 550 550 200,662
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Office
Building
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreational
Swimming Pool
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Appendix B Page 70
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
29 / 40
5.10. Operational Area Sources
5.10.1. Hearths
5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 239
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 28
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
639318.825 213,106 13,050 4,350 966
5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
Appendix B Page 71
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
30 / 40
5.11. Operational Energy Consumption
5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,030,099 532 0.0330 0.0040 3,121,023 Strip Mall 30,937 532 0.0330 0.0040 18,859
— 81,211 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Apartments Mid Rise 1,030,099 532 0.0330 0.0040 3,121,023 Strip Mall 30,446 532 0.0330 0.0040 18,560
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Health Club 38,371 532 0.0330 0.0040 171,208
General Office Building 28,512 532 0.0330 0.0040 40,554 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 988,148 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption
5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 10,473,938 372,083
Strip Mall 229,625 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Health Club 236,573 0.00
General Office Building 284,374 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 47,315 0.00
Appendix B Page 72
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
31 / 40
5.13. Operational Waste Generation
5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 207.85 0.00
Strip Mall 3.26 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00
Health Club 22.80 0.00
General Office Building 1.49 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Recreational Swimming Pool 4.56 0.00
5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment
5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Appendix B Page 73
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
32 / 40
Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C & R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0 Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
Health Club Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Health Club Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Recreational Swimming
Pool
Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Recreational Swimming
Pool
Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Appendix B Page 74
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
33 / 40
5.16. Stationary Sources
5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor
5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)
5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —
5.18. Vegetation
5.18.1. Land Use Change
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
5.18.2. Sequestration
Appendix B Page 75
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
34 / 40
5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)
6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.
Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 7.09 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.75 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.40 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.
Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.
6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Appendix B Page 76
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
35 / 40
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.
The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.
6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
7. Health and Equity Details
Appendix B Page 77
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
36 / 40
7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 22.2
AQ-PM 60.7
AQ-DPM 80.1
Drinking Water 32.0
Lead Risk Housing 16.1
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 95.6
Traffic 70.9
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 71.9
Groundwater 67.2
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 89.3
Impaired Water Bodies 90.1
Solid Waste 81.5
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 6.67
Cardio-vascular 21.0
Low Birth Weights —
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 4.21
Housing 3.42
Linguistic 0.00
Poverty 5.80
Appendix B Page 78
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
37 / 40
Unemployment 2.73
7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty —
Employed —
Median HI —
Education —
Bachelor's or higher —
High school enrollment —
Preschool enrollment —
Transportation —
Auto Access —
Active commuting —
Social —
2-parent households —
Voting —
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability —
Park access —
Retail density —
Supermarket access —
Tree canopy —
Housing —
Homeownership —
Appendix B Page 79
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
38 / 40
Housing habitability —
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden —
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden —
Uncrowded housing —
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults —
Arthritis 7.9
Asthma ER Admissions 82.1
High Blood Pressure 8.1
Cancer (excluding skin) 2.2
Asthma 86.2
Coronary Heart Disease 8.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 50.7
Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 0.0
Cognitively Disabled 98.4
Physically Disabled 65.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 61.9
Mental Health Not Good 91.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 27.1
Obesity 74.1
Pedestrian Injuries 0.0
Physical Health Not Good 72.6
Stroke 39.4
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 68.3
Current Smoker 92.8
Appendix B Page 80
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
39 / 40
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 92.5
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 19.3
Children 99.4
Elderly 4.8
English Speaking 0.0
Foreign-born 0.0
Outdoor Workers 71.9
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 19.6
Traffic Density 0.0
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 0.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 0.0
7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 5.00 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) —
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.
Appendix B Page 81
Congressional Project v2 Detailed Report, 4/5/2023
40 / 40
7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.
7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.
8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Project Description
Construction: Construction Phases Applicant provided schedule Construction: Off-Road Equipment Applicant provided equipment list Construction: Off-Road Equipment EF Applied default emission factors where information was unavailable Operations: Hearths Project has no wood devices.
Operations: Consumer Products —
Operations: Architectural Coatings —
Operations: Energy Use —
Operations: Water and Waste Water —
Operations: Solid Waste —
Operations: Refrigerants —
Construction: Architectural Coatings Includes parking structure Operations: Vehicle Data Adjusted to match net new ADT from TIA Appendix B Page 82
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix C Biological Technical Report
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT
6700 EAST PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Holland Partner Group
5000 E. Spring Street, Suite 500
Long Beach, California 90815
Prepared by:
Glenn Lukos Associates
1940 East Deere Avenue, Suite 250
Santa Ana, California 92705
Tony Bomkamp, Technical Director
JUNE 2022 [REVISED FEBRUARY 3, 2023]
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................1
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE ...............................................................................1
3.0 METHODS.........................................................................................................................................1
4.0 REGULATORY SETTING/REQUIREMENTS ..........................................................................2
5.0 RESULTS...........................................................................................................................................8
6.0 PROJECT-RELATED IMPACTS ................................................................................................ 20
7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES ......................................................................................................... 26
8.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 28
9.0 CERTIFICATION........................................................................................................................... 30
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Regional Map Exhibit 1
Vicinity Map Exhibit 2
Site Plan Map Exhibit 3
Vegetation/Land Cover Map Exhibit 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A Floral Compendium
Appendix B Faunal Compendium
1 1.0 SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS
This report addresses the potential biological resource impacts associated with the redevelopment of a 2.61-acre office building site located within the Southeast Area Specific Plan Area (SEASP) in Long Beach, California [Exhibit 1—Regional Map]. The Project site is in Section 3 of Township 4 South, Range 12 West of the Los Alamitos 7.5′ U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Quadrangle Map (dated 1964 and photorevised in 1981) [Exhibit 2—Vicinity Map].
The site is roughly bound by Studebaker Road and existing development on the northwest, Marina Drive and existing development on the southwest, Pacific Coast Highway and existing development to the northeast, and the San Gabriel River flood control channel on the southeast.
The SEASP designates the San Gabriel River as an Open Water Local Sensitive Coastal Habitat Area.
The site is currently developed with a 77,000 square foot commercial office building, one level of subterranean parking, surface parking lots with outdoor lighting, and ornamental trees, shrubs, and turf grass. The site contains no native habitat.
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE
The purpose for conducting biological surveys is to determine if (1) special-status species occur within the property, (2) construction of the project would result in significant impacts to biological resources, and (3) construction of the project would have adverse impacts to biological resources associated with the San Gabriel River.
The project will redevelop the site with a six-story (over one basement level) mixed-use development with 3,100 square feet of retail space, 281 residential units, of which 13 (5 percent of base density) will be designated as Very Low Income, and 516 parking stalls [Exhibit 3—Site Plan Map].
3.0 METHODS
Senior Biologist Tony Bomkamp from Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA) visited the property on March 22, 2022, to conduct a habitat assessment, map the vegetation alliances and land cover types, conduct general biological surveys, and evaluate the conditions associated with the San Gabriel River. GLA arborist Jillian Stephens and biologist Velvet Park visited the site on April 21, 2022, to evaluate the trees on the project site and conduct general biological surveys. The site was also evaluated for the presence of aquatic features potentially subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) pursuant to Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. Reconnaissance was conducted in such a manner as to allow inspection of the entire site by direct observation, aided by binoculars for avian identification.
The focus of the biological surveys was determined through review of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFW 2022), the CDFW Special Animals List (CDFW 2022), the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory (CNPS 2022), the USFWS online list of threatened and endangered species for Los Angeles and nearby Orange County, other 2 pertinent literature (including SEASP documents), and extensive knowledge of the Long Beach environs and associated biological resources. Vegetation cover and land use types within the project site were also surveyed on foot and mapped directly onto a 100-scale topographic map based on, as applicable, A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition (Sawyer et al. 2009), which is the California expression of the National Vegetation Classification. Habitat assessments and general biological surveys within the Study Area were conducted on foot for each target plant or animal species identified below.
4.0 REGULATORY SETTING/REQUIREMENTS
The proposed activities may be subject to local, state, and federal regulations associated with a number of regulatory programs. These programs often overlap and were developed to protect natural resources, including state and federally listed plants and animals; aquatic resources including rivers and creeks, ephemeral streambeds, wetlands, and areas of riparian habitat; other special-status species which are not listed as threatened or endangered by the state or federal governments; and other special-status vegetation communities.
4.1 State and/or Federally Listed Plants or Animals
4.1.1 State of California Endangered Species Act
California’s Endangered Species Act (CESA) defines an endangered species as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant which is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of its range due to one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation, competition, or disease.” The State defines a threatened species as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an Endangered species in the foreseeable future in the absence of the special protection and management efforts required by this chapter. Any animal determined by the commission as rare on or before January 1, 1985, is a threatened species.” Candidate species are defined as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that the commission has formally noticed as being under review by the department for addition to either the list of endangered species or the list of threatened species, or a species for which the commission has published a notice of proposed regulation to add the species to either list.” Candidate species may be afforded temporary protection as though they were already listed as threatened or endangered at the discretion of the Fish and Game Commission. Unlike the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), CESA does not list invertebrate species.
Article 3, Sections 2080 through 2085, of the CESA addresses the taking of threatened, endangered, or candidate species by stating “No person shall import into this state, export out of this state, or take, possess, purchase, or sell within this state, any species, or any part or product thereof, that the commission determines to be an endangered species or a threatened species, or attempt any of those acts, except as otherwise provided.” Under the CESA, “take” is defined as “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.” Exceptions authorized by the state to allow “take” require permits or memoranda of understanding and can be authorized for endangered species, threatened species, or candidate 3 species for scientific, educational, or management purposes and for take incidental to otherwise lawful activities. Sections 1901 and 1913 of the California Fish and Game Code provide that notification is required prior to disturbance.
4.1.2 Federal Endangered Species Act
The FESA of 1973 defines an endangered species as “any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” A threatened species is defined as “any species that is likely to become an Endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Under provisions of Section 9(a)(1)(B) of the FESA it is unlawful to “take” any listed species. “Take” is defined in Section 3(18) of FESA: “...harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” Further, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), through regulation, has interpreted the terms “harm” and “harass” to include certain types of habitat modification that result in injury to, or death of species as forms of “take.” These interpretations, however, are generally considered and applied on a case-by-case basis and often vary from species to species.
In a case where a property owner seeks permission from a federal agency for an action that could affect a federally listed plant and animal species, the property owner and agency are required to consult with USFWS. Section 9(a)(2)(b) of the FESA addresses the protections afforded to listed plants.
4.1.3 State and Federal Take Authorizations for Listed Species Federal or state authorizations of impacts to or incidental take of a listed species by a private individual or other private entity would be granted in one of the following ways:
• Section 7 of the FESA stipulates that any federal action that may affect a species listed as threatened or endangered requires a formal consultation with USFWS to ensure that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the listed species or result in destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. 16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2). • In 1982, the FESA was amended to give private landowners the ability to develop Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) pursuant to Section 10(a) of the FESA. Upon development of an HCP, the USFWS can issue incidental take permits for listed species where the HCP specifies at minimum, the following: (1) the level of impact that will result from the taking, (2) steps that will minimize and mitigate the impacts, (3) funding necessary to implement the plan, (4) alternative actions to the taking considered by the applicant and the reasons why such alternatives were not chosen, and (5) such other measures that the Secretary of the Interior may require as being necessary or appropriate for the plan. • Sections 2090-2097 of the CESA require that the state lead agency consult with CDFW on projects with potential impacts on state-listed species. These provisions also require CDFW to coordinate consultations with USFWS for actions involving federally listed as well as state-listed species.
4 4.2 Local Approvals
4.2.1 City of Long Beach
The Project Site is located within the coastal zone, which is under the permitting authority of the City of Long Beach through the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). The Project site is also located within the SEASP area, which is subject to policies from the LCP and Coastal Act incorporated into the SEASP. The California Coastal Commission certified the SEASP on September 28, 2021; accordingly, development consistent with SEASP may be approved by the City of Long Beach without further input from the Coastal Commission.
The Project site is located entirely within an area designated by Section 4.4.5 of SEASP as Mixed-Use Community Core:
This area is envisioned as the primary activity center in the SEASP area and provides for a mix of uses including residential, regional retail, hotel, and office uses. The focus of this designation is on creating a pedestrian scale environment, including increased connectivity, gathering spaces, and linkages to the marina and wetlands. Permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for this designation are identified in Table 4-4 of SEASP, Permitted Uses.
The San Gabriel River flood control channel adjacent to the Project site abuts residential and commercial development and public roadways. The San Gabriel River flood control channel is designated by SEASP as an Open Water Local Sensitive Habitat Area. Eelgrass, a National Marine Fisheries Service “Habitat of Particular Concern”, and green sea turtles, which forage on eelgrass, have been observed along the San Gabriel River. The Open Water portion of the San Gabriel River flood control channel is recognized as an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (Glenn Lukos Associates 2019).
The Project site is subject to the following relevant SEASP Policies:
Public Access 17:
The owner of the Congressional Place property located between the San Gabriel River, Marina Drive, Studebaker Road, and PCH shall dedicate and improve necessary land along the San Gabriel River bank to provide a pedestrian walk, bicycle trail, and related landscaping. Such development to continue one-half of the distance under the Pacific Coast Highway bridge to join with similar facilities at the Pumpkin Patch site. Also, the developer shall continue Studebaker extension bikeway from Pacific Coast Highway to Marina Drive.
Policy 5.17: Projects Within 100 Feet of Wetlands, ESHA, or Sensitive Coastal Habitat Areas
For projects located on a property where any portion of that property is located within 100 feet of any designated wetland or ESHA, as defined in this chapter, or within 100 feet of a potential wetland or ESHA based on site specific characteristics or nearby wetland 5 delineations, or within 100 feet of a sensitive coastal habitat area, as defined in this chapter, the property owner shall be required to submit a CDP application complete with biological surveys and a wetland delineation, if applicable, and a Site Plan Review application, and shall be consistent with the provisions of this chapter.
Policy 5.18: Standards Applicable to All Areas Adjacent to Jurisdictional Waters, ESHA and Wetlands
Development projects within 100 feet of Coastal Act wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat (ESHA), and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands, and Recreation land use shall comply with the following:
• Prior to approval of a trails/access plan within or adjacent to wetlands or ESHA, the location, design, and text for urban-open space interface signage shall be developed. The signage shall be located at all pedestrian access points. The signage shall educate users on the responsibilities associated with the open space interface and shall address relevant issues, including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants. • Prior to approval of any development adjacent to the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands, and Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 footcandles at the edge of the habitat. This would ensure that spill light does not result in exposure of artificial light at levels exceeding the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.5 foot-candles).
• Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant and/or subsequent builder shall prepare an urban-open space interface brochure to be approved by the Long Beach Development Services Department to educate residents on the responsibilities associated with living near sensitive biological habitat. The brochure shall address relevant issues, including noise, dark skies, nesting birds, bird-safe buildings, and the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants. The approved brochure, along with attachments, shall be included as part of the rental/lease agreements and as part of the sales literature for future developments.
Policy 5.19: Wetland Conservation and Monitoring Fund
The City shall establish a Wetland Conservation and Monitoring Fund and establish fees pursuant to a Property Analysis Record (PAR). Each development or redevelopment shall contribute its fair share based on the size of the development to this fund, which will be created to provide restoration and long-term management to the publicly owned wetlands within the SEASP Plan area. Fees shall be assessed on the project through conditions of approval of the Coastal Development Permit. When an agency or non-profit corporation accepts permanent management responsibilities of the wetlands, the Fund may be transferred to that agency or corporation.
6 The proposed Project is considered a redevelopment project and is not subject to policies pertaining to new development; however, new projects with 100 feet of open water are subject to the following SEASP Policy:
Policy 5.32: In addition to the standards above, new development located on properties that contain or are located within 100 feet of wetlands, ESHA, or sensitive coastal habitat areas (including open water), as defined in this chapter, shall also comply with the following:
A. Lighting shall be designed to achieve the minimum degree of illumination necessary for public safety, minimize light trespass into adjacent non-target areas, and limit the illumination of open space and sensitive coastal habitat areas to the maximum extent feasible.
Lighting shall be downward directed, shielded, energy efficient, dark sky-compatible, and shall incorporate state-of-the-art improvements in lighting technology when replaced thereafter. Replacement bulbs or fixtures shall be upgraded to incorporate best available technology over the life of the installation. Programmable timing devices shall be utilized to turn off unnecessary lights where feasible. Illuminated signs shall not be allowed.
B. Minimize the number of and, whenever possible, co-locate rooftop antennas and other rooftop structures.
C. Monopole structures or antennas shall not include guy wires.
D. Amplified music shall not be permitted.
E. The use of insecticides, herbicides, anticoagulant rodenticides or any toxic chemical substance that has the potential to significantly degrade biological resources shall be prohibited, except where necessary to protect or enhance the habitat itself, such as for eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, and where there are no feasible alternatives that would result in fewer adverse effects to the habitat value of the site.
Application of such chemical substances shall not take place during the winter season or when rain is predicted within a week of application. Herbicide application necessary to prevent regrowth of highly-invasive exotic vegetation such as giant reed/cane (Arundo donax) shall be restricted to the best available and least-toxic product and method in order to minimize adverse impacts to wildlife and the potential for introduction of herbicide into the aquatic environment or onto adjacent non-targeted vegetation. In no instance shall herbicide application occur if wind speeds on site are greater than five miles per hour or 48 hours prior to predicted rain. In the event that rain does occur, herbicide application shall not resume again until 72 hours after rain.
7 4.3 California Environmental Quality Act
4.3.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15380
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires evaluation of a project’s impacts on biological resources and provides guidelines and thresholds for use by lead agencies for evaluating the significance of proposed impacts. Sections 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 below set forth these thresholds and guidelines. Furthermore, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15380, CEQA provides protection for non-listed species that could potentially meet the criteria for state listing.
For plants, CDFW adopts the California Rare Plant Ranks (CRPR) and recognizes that species ranked as Rank 1A, 1B, 2A, or 2B of the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants in California may meet the criteria for listing and should be considered under CEQA. CDFW also recommends protection of plants, which are regionally important, such as locally rare species, disjunct populations of more common plants, or plants on the CNPS Ranks 3 or 4.
4.3.2 Non-Listed Special-Status Plants and Animals Evaluated Under CEQA Federally Designated Special-Status Species
Within recent years, the USFWS instituted changes in the listing status of candidate species.
Former C1 (candidate) species are now referred to simply as candidate species and represent the only candidates for listing. Former C2 species (for which the USFWS had insufficient evidence to warrant listing) and C3 species (either extinct, no longer a valid taxon or more abundant than was formerly believed) are no longer considered as candidate species. Therefore, these species are no longer maintained in list form by the USFWS, nor are they formally protected. However, some USFWS field offices have issued memoranda stating that former C2 species are to be considered federal Species of Concern (FSC). This term is employed in this document but carries no official protections. All references to federally protected species in this report (whether listed, proposed for listing, or candidate) include the most current published status or candidate category to which each species has been assigned by USFWS. For this report the following acronyms are used for federal special-status species:
• FE Federally listed as Endangered
• FT Federally listed as Threatened
• FPE Federally proposed for listing as Endangered
• FPT Federally proposed for listing as Threatened
• FC Federal candidate species (former C1 species)
State-Designated Special-Status Species
Some mammals and birds are protected by the state as Fully Protected (SFP) Mammals or Fully Protected Birds, as described in the California Fish and Game Code, Sections 4700 and 3511, respectively. California Species of Special Concern (SSC) are species designated as vulnerable to extinction due to declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats. This list is primarily a working document for the CDFW’s CNDDB project. Informally listed taxa are not protected but warrant consideration in the preparation of biotic assessments. For some 8 species, the CNDDB is only concerned with specific portions of the life history, such as roosts, rookeries, or nest sites.
For this report the following acronyms are used for State special-status species:
• SE State-listed as Endangered
• ST State-listed as Threatened
• SR State-listed as Rare
• SCE State candidate for listing as Endangered
• SCT State candidate for listing as Threatened
• SFP State Fully Protected
• SSC California Species of Special Concern (CDFW)
• WL Watch List (CDFW)
5.0 RESULTS
5.1 Vegetation Mapping
During vegetation mapping of the 2.61-acre site, three vegetation/land use types were identified:
developed, ornamental vegetation, and turf grass. Table 1 provides a summary of vegetation types/land uses and the corresponding acreage. Detailed descriptions of each vegetation type follow the table. A Vegetation/Land Cover Map is attached as Exhibit 4.
Table 1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Use Types for the Subject Property Onsite Vegetation/Land Use Type
Area
(Acres)
Developed 1.96
Ornamental 0.26
Turf 0.39
Total 2.61
Developed
Developed areas account for 1.96 acres and consist of existing and currently occupied commercial buildings and associated parking lot and parking structure.
Ornamental Vegetation
Ornamental Vegetation accounts for 0.26 acre, and includes areas of trees, shrubs and non-turf ground covers that comprise the landscaping around the existing buildings and parking areas.
Trees include the non-native Lombardy poplar (Populus nigra) and rusty fig (Ficus rubiginosa) that have been planted as landscape trees within the landscape planters. Shrubs include lantana (Lantana camara), pittosporum (Pittosporum tobira and P. tenuifolium), periwinkle (Vinca minor), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and bougainvillea (Bougainvillea sp.). 9 Turf
Turf accounts for 0.39 acre and consists of non-native turf species.
5.2 Special Status Species
Species were considered based on a number of factors, including: 1) species identified by the April 2022 CNDDB as occurring (either currently of historically) on or in the vicinity of the subject areas, and 2) any other special-status species that are known to occur within the vicinity of the subject areas, or for which potentially suitable habitat occurs within the subject areas.
5.2.1 Special-Status Animals
Table 2 includes a summary list of the special-status animal species considered in the biological study and their legal status based on documented historic occurrences within the Los Alamitos quad and surrounding areas. Animal species that are state and/or federally listed or are proposed for listing and are addressed in this report include Pacific green sea turtle and California least tern. Because of the developed condition of the property, there is no habitat capable of supporting these or any special-status animal species.
Table 2. Special-Status Wildlife Species Considered for the Biological Study Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for
Occurrence
INVERTEBRATES
Crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Relatively warm and dry sites, including
the inner Coast Range of California and
margins of the Mojave Desert.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Dorothy’s El Segundo Dune
weevil
Trigonoscuta dorothea dorothea
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Sand dunes in El Segundo, CA. Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Mimic tryonia (California
brackishwater snail)
Tryonia imitator
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Coastal areas with brackish waters. Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Monarch – California
overwintering population
Danaus plexippus pop. 1
Federal: FC
State: None
CDFW: None
Roosts in winter in wind-protected tree
groves along the California coast from
northern Mendocino to Baja California,
Mexico.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Palos Verdes blue butterfly
Glaucopsyche lygdamus
palosverdesensis
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Locoweed and deerweed in the Palos
Verdes Peninsula.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Salt marsh wandering skipper
Panoquina errans
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Coastal salt marsh and coastal strand
areas dominated by saltgrass.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
San Diego fairy shrimp
Branchinecta sandiegonensis
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Seasonal vernal pools. No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
10 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Sandy beach tiger beetle
Cicindela hirticollis gravida
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Inhabits areas adjacent to non-brackish
water; prefers clean, dry, light-colored
sand in the upper zone. Larvae burrow
into moist sand not affected by wave
action.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Senile tiger beetle
Cicindela senilis frosti
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Open, unvegetated areas in or near salt
marshes.
Not detected during surveys.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Riverside fairy shrimp
Streptocephalus wootoni
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Deep seasonal vernal pools, with warm
water, and low to moderate dissolved
solids, that remained filled for extended
periods of time. Annual grasslands or
patches.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Western beach tiger beetle
Cicindela latesignata
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Forages in open unvegetated areas
such as marsh pannes and levees.
Larvae burrow in moist unvegetated
substrates.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Western tidal-flat tiger beetle
Habroscelimorpha gabbii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Open, unvegetated areas in or near salt
marshes.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
AMPHIBIANS
Arroyo toad
Bufo californicus
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Historically along length of drainages;
currently in headwaters, sandy washes
and arroyos grown to willows,
cottonwoods or sycamores.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
California red-legged frog
Rana draytonii
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Permanent flowing water sources,
including marshes, streams, lakes
ponds; woodland or valley foothill
grasslands; sufficient vegetative cover
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Western spadefoot toad
Spea hammondii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Coastal sage scrub, vernal pools, and
grasslands; breeds in associated
temporary pools and riparian areas.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
REPTILES
Coast-horned lizard
Phrynosoma blainvilli
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of vegetation types
including coastal sage scrub, chaparral,
annual grassland, oak woodland, and
riparian woodlands.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Coast patch-nosed snake
Salvadora hexalepis virgultea
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Open areas within coastal sage scrub,
chaparral, grassland, desert scrub,
washes, sand flats, & rocky areas.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Orange-throated whiptail
Aspidoscelis hyperythra
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Inhabits low-elevation coastal scrub,
chaparral, and valley-foothill hardwood
habitats. Prefers washes & other sandy
areas with patches of brush & rocks.
Perennial plants necessary for its major
food, termites.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
11 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
East Pacific green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: None
Green turtles are generally found in
fairly shallow waters (except when
migrating) inside reefs, bays, and inlets.
The turtles are attracted to lagoons and
shoals with an abundance of seagrass
and algae.
May forage in the San Gabriel
River channel adjacent to the
site. No suitable nesting or
basking habitat on the banks
of the river adjacent to the
site. Does not occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
Red diamond rattlesnake
Crotalus ruber
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Chapparal, woodland, grassland, &
desert areas from coastal San Diego
County to the eastern slopes of the
mountains. Occurs in rocky areas &
dense vegetation. Needs rodent
burrows, cracks in rocks or surface
cover objects.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
San Diego horned lizard
Phrynosoma coronatum
blainvillei
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of vegetation types
including coastal sage scrub, chaparral,
annual grassland, oak woodland, and
riparian woodlands. Sandy soils.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Southern California legless lizard
Anniella stebbinsi
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Sparse coastal sage scrub, chaparral,
grassland, riparian and woodland
habitats within moist sandy soil.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Western pond turtle
Emys marmorata
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Slow-moving permanent or intermittent
streams, small ponds and lakes,
reservoirs, abandoned gravel pits,
permanent and ephemeral shallow
wetlands, stock ponds, and treatment
lagoons. Abundant basking sites and
cover necessary, including logs, rocks,
submerged vegetation, and undercut
banks.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Two-striped garter snake
Thamnophis hammondii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Highly aquatic. Found in freshwater
marshes and riparian habitats, in or
near permanent fresh water. Often
along streams with rocky beds and
riparian growth.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
BIRDS
American peregrine falcon
Falco peregrinus anatum
Federal: None
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Near wetlands, lakes, rivers or other
water, on cliffs, banks, dunes, mounds,
also human-made structures.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Bank swallow
Riparia riparia
Federal: None
State: ST
CDFW: None
Colonial nester; nests primarily in
riparian and other lowland habitats west
or the desert. Requires vertical
banks/cliffs with fine-textured/sandy
soils near streams, rivers, lakes, ocean
to dig nesting hole.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Belding's savannah sparrow
Passerculus sandwichensis
beldingi
Federal: None
State: SE
CDFW: None
Coastal salt marshes. Nests in
Salicornia sp. and about margins of
tidal flats.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Bell’s sage sparrow
Artemisiospiza belli belli
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Nests in chaparral dominated by fairly
dense stands of chamise. Found in
coastal sage scrub in south of range.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
12 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Nest located on the ground beneath a
shrub or in a shrub 6-18 inches above
the ground.
Black skimmer
Rynchops niger
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Nests on gravel bars, low islets and
sandy beaches, in unvegetated sites.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Open, dry annual or perennial
grasslands, deserts & scrublands
characterized by low-growing
vegetation. Subterranean nester,
dependent upon burrowing mammals,
most notably, the California ground
squirrel.
No potential to occur on site
for wintering or nesting due to
a lack of suitable habitat.
California black rail
Laterallus jamaicensis
coturniculus
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: CFP
Salt marshes bordering larger bays,
coastal spartina marshes, inland in
dense, shortgrass, shallow marshes.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
California brown pelican
Pelecanus occidentalis
californicus
Federal: Delisted
State: Delisted
CDFW: CFP
Coastal, salt bays, ocean, beaches.
Nests on coastal islands of small to
moderate size that afford immunity from
attack by ground-dwelling predators.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
California horned lark
Eremophila alpestris actia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Coastal regions in Southern California.
Short-grass prairies “bald” hills,
mountain meadows, open coastal
plains, fallow grain fields, alkali flats.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
California least tern
Sterna antillarum browni
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Flat, vegetated substrates near the
coast. Occurs near estuaries, bays, or
harbors where fish is abundant.
Has been observed foraging
in coastal wetland habitat in
the vicinity of the site.
Potential to forage in the San
Gabriel RiRiver Channel
adjacent to the site; no
foraging or breeding habitat
on the site.
Coastal cactus wren
Campylorhynchus
brunneicapillus couesi
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Southern California coastal sage scrub.
Wrens require tall opuntia cactus for
nesting and roosting.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Coastal California gnatcatcher
Polioptila californica
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Low elevation coastal sage scrub and
coastal bluff scrub.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Double-crested cormorant
Phalacrocorax auritus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Coasts, bays, lakes, rivers. No potential to occur on site due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Ferruginous hawk
Buteo regalis
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Only present as wintering individuals.
Prefers open grasslands and
agricultural areas.
No potential to nest or forage
on site.
Golden Eagle
Aquila chrysaetos
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: CFP, WL
In southern California, occupies
grasslands, brushlands, deserts, oak
savannas, open coniferous forests, and
montane valleys. Nests on rock
outcrops and ledges.
Not observed on site. No
potential to occur on site due
to lack of suitable habitat.
13 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Least Bell’s vireo
Vireo belii pusilus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: None
Summer resident of southern California
in low riparian in vicinity of water or in
dry river bottoms. Nests placed along
margins of bushes or on twigs
projecting into pathways, usually willow,
Baccharis, mesquite.
No potential to occur on site
due to lack of suitable habitat.
California Ridgway’s rail
Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Found in salt marshes where cordgrass
and pickleweed are the dominant
vegetation. Requires dense growth of
either pickleweed or cordgrass for
nesting or escape cover, feeds on
mollusks and crustaceans.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Loggerhead shrike
Lanius ludovicianus
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Broken woodlands, savannah, pinyonjuniper, Joshua tree & riparian woodlands, desert oases, scrub &
washes. Prefers open country for
hunting with perches for scanning and
fairly dense shrubs and brush for
nesting.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Long-eared owl
Asio otus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Riparian bottomlands grown to tall
willows & cottonwoods; also belts of
live oak paralleling stream courses.
Require adjacent open land productive
of mice and presence of old nests of
crows.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Merlin
Falco columbarius
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Only present as wintering individuals.
Forages in a variety of habitats
including riparian areas such as
present on the site.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Northern harrier (nesting)
Circus hudsonius
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
A variety of habitats, including open
wetlands, grasslands, wet pasture, old
fields, dry uplands, and croplands.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Osprey
Pandion haliaetus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Ocean shore, bays, fresh-water lakes,
and larger streams. Large nests built in
treetops within one mile of a good fishproducing body of water.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Tri-colored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: SSC
Requires open water, protected nesting
& foraging area with insect prey within
a few km of the colony.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Short-eared owl
Asio flammeus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Found in swamplands, both fresh and
salt; lowland meadows; irrigated alfalfa
fields. Tule patches/tall grass needed
for nesting/daytime seclusion. Nests on
dry ground in depression concealed in
vegetation.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Southwestern willow flycatcher
Empidonax traillii extimus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: None
Riparian woodlands in southern
California.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
14 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Swainson’s Hawk
Buteo swainsoni
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: None
Breeding habitat consists of grasslands
with scattered trees, juniper-sage flats,
riparian areas, savannahs, &
agricultural or ranch lands. Requires
adjacent suitable foraging areas such
as grasslands or alfalfa or grain fields
that support rodent populations.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Least bittern
Ixobrychus exilis
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Colonial nester in marshlands and
borders of ponds and reservoirs that
provide ample cover. Nests usually
placed low in tules over water.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Western snowy plover
Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus
Federal: FT, BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Sandy or gravelly beaches along the
coast, estuarine salt ponds, alkali lakes,
and at the Salton Sea.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Western yellow-billed cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis
Federal: FT, BCC
State: SE
CDFW: None
Dense, wide riparian woodlands with
well-developed understories.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
White-tailed kite (nesting)
Elanus leucurus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: CFP
Low elevation open grasslands,
savannah-like habitats, agricultural
areas, wetlands, and oak woodlands.
Dense canopies used for nesting and
cover.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Yellow-breasted chat
Icteria virens
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Summer resident; inhabits riparian
thickets of willow & other brushy
tangles near watercourses. Nests in
low, dense riparian, consisting of
willow, blackberry, wild grape; forages
and nests within 10 ft of ground.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Yellow warbler
Setophagia petechia
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Riparian plant associations. Prefers
willows, cottonwoods, aspens,
sycamores & alders for nesting &
foraging. Also nests in montane
shrubbery in open conifer forests.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
MAMMALS
American badger
Taxidea taxus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in drier shrub, forest, and
herbaceous habitats. Needs open,
uncultivated ground and friable soils for
digging burrows. Preys on burrowing
rodents.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Big free-tailed bat
Nyctinomops macrotis
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
WBWG:MH
Occurs in low-lying arid areas in
Southern California. Roosts in high
cliffs or rocky outcrops.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
WBWG: M
Prefers open habitats or habitat
mosaics, with access to trees for cover
& open areas or habitat edges for
feeding. Roosts in dense foliage of
medium to large trees. Feeds primarily
on moths. Requires water.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Pacific pocket mouse
Perognathus longimembris
pacificus
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Seems to prefer soils of fine alluvial
sands near the ocean.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
15 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
San Diego desert woodrat
Neotoma lepida intermedia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of shrub and desert
habitats, primarily associated with rock
outcrops, boulders, cacti, or areas of
dense undergrowth.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Silver-haired bat
Lasionycteris noctivagans
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
WBWG: M
Temperate, northern hardwoods with
ponds or streams nearby. Roost in
hollow snags and bird nests.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
South coast marsh vole
Microtus californicus stephensi
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Tidal marshes in Los Angeles, Orange
and southern Ventura Counties.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Southern California salt marsh
shrew
Sorex ornatus salicornicus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Coastal marshes in Los Angeles,
Orange and southern Ventura
Counties. Requires dense vegetation
and woody debris for cover.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Western mastiff bat
Eumops perotis californicus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
WBWG: H
Many open, semi-arid to arid habitats,
including conifer & deciduous
woodlands, coastal scrub, grasslands,
chaparral, etc. Roosts in crevices in cliff
faces, high buildings, trees, & tunnels.
No potential to occur on site
due to a lack of suitable
habitat.
Federal State
FE – Federally Endangered SE – State Endangered
FT – Federally Threatened ST – State Threatened
FC – Federal Candidate Species
BCC – Federal Birds of Conservation of Concern
CDFW
SSC – California Species of Special Concern
CFP – California Fully-Protected Species
WL – Watch List
Western Bat Working Group (WBWG)
H – High Priority
LM – Low-Medium Priority
M – Medium Priority
MH – Medium-High Priority
California Least Tern (Sterna antillarum browni)
The California least tern is listed under both the state and federal Endangered Species Acts as endangered and is also a California fully protected species. In southern California it breeds at scattered sites along the coast from San Diego to San Luis Obispo counties. The open water of the San Gabriel River channel adjacent to the site provides potentially suitable foraging habitat for the California least tern. However, as the site is fully developed, there is no suitable foraging or nesting habitat for California least tern.
16 East Pacific Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas)
The East Pacific green sea turtle is federal threatened and listed on the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List as EN (endangered). This species is generally found in fairly shallow waters (except when migrating) inside reefs, bays, and inlets. The turtles are attracted to lagoons and shoals with abundant seagrass and algae for foraging. It returns to beaches for nesting and for basking in some parts of its range (terrestrial basking is documented primarily from Hawaii, the Galapagos Islands, and Australia). The East Pacific green sea turtle is the distinct population segment of the green turtle that occurs in the eastern Pacific Ocean and on the west coast of North and South America. Turtles from this population nest on beaches in Mexico, Central America, and the Galapagos Islands; there are no known nesting sites on the U.S. west coast. Green sea turtles occur in the vicinity of the project site in San Gabriel River, deep portions of Steam Shovel Slough, and the Los Cerritos Wetlands where they forage on eelgrass beds. The segment of the San Gabriel River directly adjacent to the Project site is mapped by the CNDDB as potentially supporting green sea turtle. However, there is no potential for the green sea turtle to occur within 48 feet of the site. The boundary of the site is located at least 48 feet from the waterline of the river [Exhibit 3], with a steep (greater than 1:1) rip rap slope separating the river from the site. The banks are not suitable for green sea turtle basking due to the steep slope and rip rap surface.
5.2.2. Special-Status Plants
Species were considered based on several factors including: 1) species identified by the April 2022 CNDDB as occurring (either currently of historically) on or in the vicinity of the subject areas, and 2) any other special-status species that are known to occur within the vicinity of the subject areas, or for which potentially suitable habitat occurs on site. The CNPS has compiled an inventory comprised of information focusing on geographic distribution and qualitative characterization of rare, threatened, or endangered vascular plant species of California. The current inventory (2022) was used to identify sensitive plant species that in vicinity of the subject property.
Due to the developed character of the site and lack of suitable habitat, there is no potential for any special-status plant species to occur.
Table 4. Special-Status Plant Species Considered for the Biological Study Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Aphanisma
Aphanisma blitoides
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal scrub. On bluffs and slopes
near the ocean in sandy or clay soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Blochman’s dudleya
Dudleya blochmanae ssp.
blochmanae
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Coastal bluff scrub, chaparral, coastal
scrub, valley and foothill grassland.
Rocky, often clay or serpentinite soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
California box-thorn
Lycium californicum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. No potential to occur on site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
17 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
California Orcutt grass
Orcuttia californica
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Vernal pools No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Catalina crossosoma
Crossosoma californicum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Rocky soils in chaparral and coastal
scrub
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Chaparral sand verbena
Abronia villosa var. aurita
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Sandy soils in chaparral, coastal sage
scrub.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Cliff spurge
Euphorbia misera
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub,
mojavean desert scrub. Rocky soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Coast woolly-heads
Nemacaulis denudata var.
denudata
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal dunes. No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Coulter’s goldfields
Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR:1B.1
Playas, vernal pools, marshes and
swamps (coastal salt).
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Coulter’s saltbush
Atriplex coulteri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal sage scrub, valley and foothill
grassland. Occurring on alkaline or
clay soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Davidson’s saltscale
Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Alkaline soils in coastal sage scrub,
coastal bluff scrub.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Decumbent goldenbush
Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub (sandy, often
in disturbed areas)
Not detected during on site
surveys. Adjacent off site
areas support Menzies
goldenbush; however, this
highly distinctive
goldenbush variety
(decumbens) not observed
and does not occur based
on lack of detection.
Estuary seablite
Suaeda esteroa
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal salt marsh and swamps.
Occurs in sandy soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Gambel’s water cress
Nasturtium gambellii
Federal: FE
State: ST
CRPR: 1B.1
Marshes and swamps. No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Giardner’s yampah
Perideridia gairdneri ssp. gairdneri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Broadleafed upland forest, chaparral,
coastal prairie, valley and foothill
grassland, vernal pools. Vernally mesic
soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Golden-spined cereus
Bergerocactus emoryi
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest,
chaparral, coastal scrub. Sandy soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Island green dudleya
Dudleya virens ssp. insularis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Rocky soils in coastal bluff scrub and
coastal scrub.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
18 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Los Angeles sunflower
Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1A
Salt and freshwater marshes,
historically in Los Angeles, Orange,
Riverside and San Bernardino
Counties. Still Presumed to be extinct.
Plant discovered in Santa Clarita most
likely hybrid between H. nuttallii and H.
californicus.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Lyon’s pentachaeta
Pentachaeta lyonii
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Chaparral (openings), coastal sage
scrub, valley and foothill grassland.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Many-stemmed dudleya
Dudleya multicaulis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub, valley
and foothill grassland. Often occurring
in clay soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Mud nama
Nama stenocarpa
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Vernal pools and freshwater seasonal
ponds.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Palmer’s grapplinghook
Harpagonella palmeri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and
foothill grassland. Clay soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Parish’s brittlescale
Atriplex parishii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Chenopod scrub, playas, vernal pools. No potential to occur on site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Prostrate navarretia
Navarretia prostrata
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal sage scrub, valley and foothill
grassland (alkaline), vernal pools.
Occurring in mesic soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Rayless ragwort
Senecio aphanactis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub. Sometimes alkaline
soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Robinson’s pepper-grass
Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.3
Chaparral, coastal scrub. No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Salt marsh bird’s-beak
Chloropyron maritimum ssp.
maritimum
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR:1B.2
Coastal dune, coastal salt marshes and
swamps.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
San Bernardino aster
Symphyotrichum defoliatum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR:1B.2
Meadows and seeps, marshes and
swamps, coastal scrub, cismontane
woodland, lower montane coniferous
forest, grassland. Vernally mesic
grassland or near ditches, streams and
springs; disturbed areas.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
San Fernando Valley spineflower
Chorizanthe parryi var. fernandina
Federal: None
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Coastal sage scrub, occurring on
sandy soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Sanford’s arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Marshes and swamps. No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Santa Barbara morning-glory
Calystegia sepium ssp.
binghamiae
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1A
Coastal marshes. Not detected during
surveys. No potential to
occur on site due to
extinction in California.
19 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Santa Catalina Island desert-thorn
Lycium brevipes var. hassei
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 3.1
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. No potential to occur on site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Brewer’s calandrinia
Calandrinia breweri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub,
valley and foothill grassland. Sandy
soils.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
South coast saltscale
Atriplex pacifica
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal sage scrub, playas.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Southern tarplant
Centromadia parryi ssp. australis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Disturbed habitats, margins of marshes
and swamps, vernally mesic valley and
foothill grassland, vernal pools.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Southwestern spiny rush
Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Mesic coastal dunes, alkaline
meadows and seeps, coastal salt
marshes and swamps.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Ventura Marsh milk-vetch
Astragalus pycnostachyus var.
lanosissimus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CNPS: List 1B.1
Coastal salt marsh. Within reach of
high tide or protected by barrier
beaches, more rarely near seeps on
sandy bluffs.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Western dichondra
Dichondra occidentalis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub, valley and foothill
grassland.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Wooly seablite
Suaeda taxifolia
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
margins of coastal salt marshes and
swamps.
No potential to occur on
site due to lack of suitable
habitat.
Federal State
FE – Federally Endangered SE – State Endangered
FT – Federally Threatened ST – State Threatened
CRPR
Rank 1A – Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere.
Rank 1B – Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere.
Rank 2A – Plants presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere.
Rank 2B – Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere.
Rank 3 – Plants about which more information is needed (a review list).
Rank 4 – Plants of limited distribution (a watch list).
Threat Code Extension
.1 – Seriously endangered in California (over 80% occurrences threatened) .2 – Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened) .3 – Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened or no current threats known)
5.3 Special-Status Habitats
A review of the April 2022 CNDDB identified southern coastal salt marsh as occurring within the USGS Los Alamitos quadrangle. The Project site does not contain southern coastal salt marsh or any special-status habitats.
20 5.4 Wildlife Movement
The site is currently fully developed and is not located within a wildlife movement corridor.
Wildlife movement occurs within the adjacent San Gabriel River; however, the development does not interfere with the movement of wildlife along the river corridor.
5.5. Jurisdictional Waters and San Gabriel River
No USGS blue-line ephemeral drainages or associated tributaries occur on the Project Site. The proposed project is outside of the jurisdictional limits of the San Gabriel River but is adjacent to the San Gabriel River flood control channel, which is categorized by SEASP as an Open Water Sensitive Coastal Habitat Area. The easterly edge of the Project site is set back a minimum of 76 feet from the open water in the San Gabriel River Channel. Neither the Project site nor the reach of the San Gabriel River adjacent to the Project site contain any wetlands as defined by the Clean Water Act or the Coastal Act. The nearest known wetlands are associated with the Los Cerritos Wetlands Authority (LCWA) wetland complex and the northeast edge of the Pumpkin Patch site, adjacent to the City’s Marketplace Marsh wetlands. The nearest LCWA parcels are located approximately 900 feet northeast and 450 feet east of the Project site, and the wetland area in the Pumpkin Patch site is approximately 770 feet to the northeast of the Project site.
As noted above, the green sea turtle is a resident in the San Gabriel River and has also been observed throughout Alamitos Bay and in the Haynes cooling channel. The number of individuals within the San Gabriel River estuary has yet to be determined. The open water channel is also forging habitat for the California least tern, federally listed as endangered and California Fully Protected. As previously determined by Glenn Lukos Associates (2019), the open water portions of the San Gabriel River flood control channel, but not the rip rap sides of the San Gabriel River channel (which provide limited ecological functions), meet the criteria for ESHA.
6.0 PROJECT-RELATED IMPACTS
The following discussion examines the potential impacts to plant and wildlife resources that would result from the proposed project. Impacts (or effects) can occur in two forms, direct and indirect. Direct impacts involve the loss, modification or disturbance of plant communities that affect the flora and fauna of those habitats. Direct impacts also include the destruction of individual plants or animals, which may also directly affect regional population numbers of a species or result in the physical isolation of populations thereby reducing genetic diversity and population stability.
Indirect impacts result in a change to the physical environment but are not immediately related to a project. Indirect (or secondary) impacts are reasonably foreseeable and caused by a project but occur at a different time or place. Indirect impacts can occur at the urban/wildland interface of projects, to biological resources located downstream from projects, and other offsite areas where the effects of the project may be experienced by plants and wildlife. Examples of indirect impacts include the effects of increases in ambient levels of noise or light; predation by domestic pets; competition with exotic plants and animals; introduction of toxics, including pesticides; and other human disturbances such as hiking, off-road vehicle use, unauthorized dumping. Indirect 21 impacts are often attributed to the subsequent day-to-day activities associated with project buildout, such as increased noise, the use of artificial light sources, and invasive ornamental plantings that may encroach into native areas. Indirect effects may be both short-term and long-term in their duration. These impacts are commonly referred to as “edge effects” and may result in a slow replacement of native plants by non-native invasive species, as well as changes in the behavioral patterns of wildlife and reduced wildlife diversity and abundance in habitats adjacent to project sites.
Cumulative impacts refer to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. A cumulative impact can occur from multiple individual effects from the same project, or from several projects. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment resulting from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time.
6.1 Discussion of Impacts Considered in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
6.1.1 Thresholds of Significance
Environmental impacts to biological resources are assessed using impact significance threshold criteria, which reflect the policy statement contained in CEQA, Section 21001(c) of the California Public Resources Code. Accordingly, the State Legislature has established it to be the policy of the State of California:
“Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man’s activities, ensure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities...”
Determining whether a project may have a significant effect, or impact, plays a critical role in the CEQA process. According to CEQA, Section 15064.7 (Thresholds of Significance), each public agency is encouraged to develop and adopt (by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation) thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. A threshold of significance is an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance with which means the effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant. In the development of thresholds of significance for impacts to biological resources CEQA provides guidance primarily in Section 15065, Mandatory Findings of Significance, and the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form. Section 15065(a) states that a project may have a significant effect where:
The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to 22 eliminate a plant or wildlife community, reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species...
Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis, impacts to biological resources are considered potentially significant (before considering offsetting mitigation measures) if one or more of the following criteria discussed below would result from implementation of the proposed project.
6.1.2 Criteria for Determining Significance Pursuant to CEQA Appendix G of the 2019 State CEQA guidelines indicate that a project may be deemed to have a significant effect on the environment if the project is likely to:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
6.2 Special Status Species
Appendix G(a) of the CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.”
6.2.1 Special-Status Plants
No special-status plants were detected during general wildlife surveys and no special-status species are expected to occur on the site due to a lack of suitable habitat. Therefore, the project 23 has no potential for significant impacts on special-status plants.
6.2.2 Special-Status Wildlife
No special-status wildlife species were detecting during general wildlife surveys and no specialstatus species are expected to occur on the site due to a lack of suitable habitat. Therefore, the project has no potential for significant impacts on special-status wildlife.
6.3 Sensitive Vegetation Communities
Appendix G(a) of the CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.”
The 2.61-acre site does not contain any riparian habitat, coastal marsh, or any other special-status habitat. The Project would not have a significant impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any vegetation types identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or the CDFG or USFWS.
6.4 Wetlands
Appendix G(c) of the State CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.”
The site does not contain any wetlands as defined by state or federal standards and does not have potential for significant impacts on wetlands.
6.5 Wildlife Movement and Nesting Birds
Appendix G(d) of the state CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.”
6.5.1 Wildlife Movement
The site in not located within a wildlife movement corridor and exhibits no potential for impacts to wildlife movement. Wildlife movement occurs within the adjacent San Gabriel River; however, the proposed project is limited to a currently developed site and thus would not interfere with the movement of wildlife along the river corridor. 24 6.5.2. Nesting Birds and Migratory Bird Treaty Act Considerations The Study Area currently contains mostly non-native trees and shrubs that have the potential to support nesting birds that are protected while nesting pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and Sections 3503 and 3503.5 of the California Fish and Game Code. Potential impacts to nesting birds can be mitigated to less than significant as described in the mitigation measures below. The site does not contain suitable trees for supporting raptor nests.
6.6 Local Policies or Ordinances
Appendix G(e) of the state CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.”
The Project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, including the policies set forth in SEASP.
6.7 Habitat Conservation Plans
Appendix G(f) of the state CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.” Construction of the project would not result in a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
6.8 Indirect Impacts to Biological Resources
In the context of biological resources, indirect impacts include those effects associated with developing areas adjacent to native open space.
A surface parking lot supporting the existing office building at the site with overhead lighting abuts the site’s southeasterly property line and is located within approximately 48 feet of the open water portion of the San Gabriel River Channel. Redevelopment of the site will remove the parking lot and overhead lighting and, as required by the SEASP, dedicate and improve a pedestrian walk, bicycle trail, and related landscaping within an 18-foot-wide easement along the site’s southeasterly property line.
The new mixed-use building will be set back 28 feet from the southeasterly property boundary.
Accordingly, the project will be set back approximately 76–77 feet from the open water portion of the San Gabriel River flood control channel.
Redevelopment is not expected to result in significant indirect impacts to the open water portion of the San Gabriel River flood control channel and its special-status biological resources. The Project will implement measures to address the following:
• Water Quality
25 • Lighting
• Noise
6.8.1 Water Quality
The proposed Project will be constructed in accordance with Coastal Act Section 30231, which states in part: “The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained…through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment, [and] controlling runoff...” The CNDDB notes that the main threats to green sea turtles in the San Gabriel River are urban runoff and garbage. Thus, the Project will implement all relevant SEASP policies to prevent impacts to water quality and biological resources within the San Gabriel River channel:
• Policy 5.21: Development shall include specific measures to help reduce potential pollutants and water quality impairment, including controlling the disposal of chemicals and hazardous materials, controlling the use of pesticides and herbicides, maintaining existing storm water capture programs, applying low impact development designs and requiring on-site retention and/or reuse of runoff.
• Policy 5.24: Drainage plans and erosion, sediment and pollution control measures shall be required as conditions of approval of every application for new development that has the potential to impair water quality.
• Policy 5.25: Development that has the potential for water quality impairment shall, at a minimum, be designed to meet National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System stormwater runoff requirements.
• Policy 5.26: Construction phase storm water pollutant controls shall be required for development that has the potential for water quality impairment, including erosion controls, sediment traps and filtering of off-site storm water flows.
Additionally, although the Project is considered redevelopment, it will conform to SEASP Policy 5.32(E) for new development:
• Policy 5.32(E) The use of insecticides, herbicides, anti-coagulant rodenticides or any toxic chemical substance that has the potential to significantly degrade biological resources shall be prohibited, except where necessary to protect or enhance the habitat itself, such as for eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, and where there are no feasible alternatives that would result in fewer adverse effects to the habitat value of the site. Application of such chemical substances shall not take place during the winter season or when rain is predicted within a week of application. Herbicide application necessary to prevent regrowth of highly-invasive exotic vegetation such as giant reed/cane (Arundo donax) shall be restricted to the best available and least-toxic product and method in order to minimize adverse impacts to wildlife and the potential for introduction of herbicide into the aquatic environment or onto adjacent non-targeted vegetation. In no instance shall herbicide application occur if wind speeds on site are greater than five miles per hour or 48 hours prior to predicted rain. In the event that rain does occur, herbicide application shall not resume again until 72 hours after rain. 26 6.8.2 Lighting
The Project will remove the existing surface parking lot and overhead lighting adjacent to the site’s southeasterly property line and within approximately 60 feet of the open water portion of the San Gabriel River flood control channel. The Project will be designed and constructed consistent with SEASP Policy 5.18, which requires that for projects “adjacent to the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands, and Recreation land use…the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 foot-candles at the edge of the habitat. This limits spill light (light trespass) to levels that do not greatly exceed the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.1 footcandles).” Additionally, the, although the Project is considered redevelopment, it will conform to SEASP Policy 5.32(A) for new development:
Lighting shall be designed to achieve the minimum degree of illumination necessary for public safety, minimize light trespass into adjacent non-target areas, and limit the illumination of open space and sensitive coastal habitat areas to the maximum extent feasible.
Lighting shall be downward directed, shielded, energy efficient, dark sky-compatible, and shall incorporate state-of-the-art improvements in lighting technology when replaced thereafter. Replacement bulbs or fixtures shall be upgraded to incorporate best available technology over the life of the installation. Programmable timing devices shall be utilized to turn off unnecessary lights where feasible. Illuminated signs shall not be allowed.
6.8.3 Noise
The Project will be designed and constructed such that noise levels within the San Gabriel River flood control channel will not exceed standards set forth in SEASP. Specifically, during the construction phase of the project, construction activities will conform to SEASP Policy 5.30, which limits construction noise if certain species of nesting birds are detected on or adjacent to the site. Additionally, although the Project is considered redevelopment, it will conform with SEASP Policy 5.32(D) for new development, which states that “Amplified music shall not be permitted.”
7.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
The mitigation measure described below as set forth in SEASP Policy 5.30 should be implemented to ensure that nesting birds are not harmed during project construction. It should be noted that raptor species are not expected to nest within the Project site because onsite observations found no nesting raptors in the Study Area due to a general lack of suitable habitat.
1. If an active nest of any species listed pursuant to the federal or California Endangered Species Act, California bird species of special concern, or a wading bird (herons or egrets) as well as owls or raptors is found, construction activities shall avoid breeding/nesting season (January through September). If construction is determined to be necessary during the breeding/nesting season, construction activities within 300 feet (500 feet from any owl or raptor nests) shall not exceed noise levels of 65 dB peak until the nest(s) is naturally vacated and juveniles have fledged and there is no evidence of a 27 second attempt at nesting. The 65 dB peak noise levels may only be increased if a noise study demonstrates the ambient noise level is above 65 dB at the subject site, and shall not be allowed to exceed the ambient level. When construction is determined to be necessary during the breeding/nesting season, breeding/nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at least 30 days prior to commencement of construction with a follow-up survey conducted 3 days prior to commencement of construction on sites where there is probable cause to believe that nesting birds may exist. 28 8.0 REFERENCES
Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken. 2012. The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Complete List of Amphibian, Reptile, Bird and Mammal Species in California. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Program, Sacramento. May 2016.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities.
State of California, California Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife.
March 20, 2018.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2021. California Natural Community List. August 18, 2021
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022a. California Natural Diversity Database:
RareFind 5. Records of occurrence for USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, and Long Beach. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, State of California Natural Resources Agency. Sacramento, California. Accessed April 25, 2022. https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022b. Special Animals List. State of California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento, California. April 2022.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022c. State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California. State of California Natural Resources Agency.
Sacramento, California. April 2022.
California Native Plant Society. 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California, Sixth edition. Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor.
California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA.
California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2022. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v9-01 2.5). Accessed April 25, 2022. https://www.rareplants.cnps.org.
Chesser, R.T. et al. 2021. Check-list of North American Birds (online). American Ornithological Society. Accessed April 25, 2022. http://checklist.americanornithology.org/taxa.
Collins, J.T. and T.W. Taggart. 2009. Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians, Sixth Edition. Publication of The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas.
Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California: Status and Distribution. Los Angeles Audubon Society.
29 Glenn Lukos Associates. 2019. Technical Memorandum: Biological Support for the Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP), Specifically Mapping of Areas Meeting the Criteria for Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) within the 1,475-Acre Specific Plan Area.
May 15, 2019.
Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Nongame-Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press.
Nelson, J. 1984. Rare plant survey guidelines. In: Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. J. Smith and R. York (eds.). Special Publication No. 1. California Native Plant Society.
National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1988. Recovery Plan for U.S. Pacific Populations of the East Pacific Green Sea Turtle (Chelonia mydas). National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD.
Sawyer, J.O, T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition. California Native Plant Society Press. Sacramento, California.
Seminoff, J.A. et al. 2015. Status review of the green turtle (Chelonia mydas) under the Endangered Species Act. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS; NOAA-TM-NMFSSWFSC; 539 Southwest Fisheries Science Center (U.S.) https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/4922
Stebbins, R.C. 1954. Amphibians and Reptiles of Western North America. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
Whittow G.C. and G.H. Balazs.1982. Basking Behavior of Hawaiian Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas). Pacific Science (1982) vol. 36, no. 2.
30 9.0 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed: ______________________________ Date: February 3, 2023 p:1575-1b.biotech
Source: ESRI World Street Map
0 2
4 8
MilesRegional Map
^_
Exhibit 1
±
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
PROJECT LOCATION
Adapted from USGS Los Alamitos, CA quadrangle
Vicinity Map
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet ± 6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Exhibit 2 Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
PROJECT LOCATION
X:\1100 AFTER THE REST\1575-01SHOR\GIS\1575-1_SitePlan.mxd 0 60 120 30
Feet
±
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Site Plan
Exhibit 3
Coordinate System: State Plane 5 NAD 83Projection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011Map Prepared by: B. Gale, GLADate Prepared: June 12, 2022 1 inch = 60 feet
N Studebaker Road
E Marina Drive
E Pacific Coast Highway
San Gabriel River
Project SiteConstruction FootprintBalcony28' Setback from Building Footprint76'-77' Buffer to Water's Edge70’-71’ Buffer from Balconies to Water’s Edge X:\1100 AFTER THE REST\1575-01SHOR\GIS\VegetationGIS\1575-1_Vegetation.mxd 0 60 120 30
Feet
±
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Vegetation/Land Cover Map
Exhibit 4
Coordinate System: State Plane 5 NAD 83Projection: Lambert Conformal ConicDatum: NAD 1983 2011Map Prepared by: B. Gale, GLADate Prepared: June 14, 2022 1 inch = 60 feet
Project SiteDevelopedOrnamentalTurf
N Studebaker Road
E Marina Drive
E Pacific Coast Highway
San Gabriel River
APPENDIX A
FLORAL COMPENDIUM
The floral compendium lists species identified on the project site by GLA (2022). Also included are species identified on the off-site San Gabriel River bike/pedestrian path, which are denoted with an asterisk (*), and species detected both on and off site, which are denoted with a double asterisk (**).
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Non-native Plant Species
Bassia hyssopifolia Fivehook bassia*
Bougainvillea sp Bougainvillea
Bromus hordeaceus Soft chess
Bromus rubens Red brome**
Chenopodium album Lamb’s quarters*
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass
Digitaria sp. Crab Grass
Erigeron bonariensis Flax-leaved horseweed*
Erigeron canadensis Canada horseweed*
Ficus rubiginosa Rusty fig
Hordeum murinum leporinum Harebarley
Lantana camara lantana
Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle
Medicago polymorpha Bur clover
Melilotus indicus Yellow sweetclover
Pittosporum tenuifolium pittosporum
Pittosporum tobira pittosporum
Populus nigra Lombardy poplar
Pseudognaphalium luteoalbum Jersey cudweed*
Salsola tragus Russian thistle**
Sonchus oleraceus Sow thistle
Stenotaphrum secundatum St. Augustine grass
Taraxacum officianale Dandelion
Vinca minor Vinca
APPENDIX B
FAUNAL COMPENDIUM
The following table lists species identified within the project site by GLA (2022). Additional bird species observed over the San Gabriel River channel are denoted with an asterisk (*).
SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
VERTEBRATES
Reptiles
Sceloporus occidentalis Western fence lizard
Birds
Anthus rubescens American pipit
Calypte anna Anna’s hummingbird
Carpodacus mexicanus House finch
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Larus californicus California gull *
Larus delawarensis Ring-billed gull *
Melospiza melodia Song sparrow
Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird
Passer domesticus House sparrow
Spinus psaltria Lesser goldfinch
Sterna forsteri Forster’s tern *
Sturnus vulgaris European starling
Tyrannus vociferans Cassin’s kingbird
Zenaida macroura Mourning dove
Zonotrichia leucophrys White-crowned sparrow
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix D Geotechnical Investigation
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED MIXED-USE APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT
6700 EAST PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Marina Shores Owner, LP
5000 E. Spring St., Suite 500
Long Beach, CA 90815
Prepared by:
Geotechnical Professionals Inc.
5736 Corporate Avenue
Cypress, California 90630
(714) 220-2211
([email protected])
Project No. 3084.1I July 29, 2022
3084-1I-01L.doc (7/22)
July 29, 2022
Marina Shores Owner, LP
5000 E. Spring St., Suite 500
Long Beach, CA 90815
Attention: Mr. Jacob Stone
Subject: Report of Geotechnical Investigation
Mixed-Use Apartment Development
6700 East Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
GPI Project Number: 3084.1I
Dear Mr. Stone:
Transmitted herewith is one electronic copy of our report of geotechnical investigation for the subject project. The report presents our evaluation of the foundation conditions at the site and recommendations for design and construction. Additional electronic copies have been distributed as outlined below.
We appreciate the opportunity of offering our services on this project and look forward to seeing the project through its successful completion. Feel free to call us if you have any questions regarding our report or need further assistance.
Very truly yours,
Geotechnical Professionals Inc.
James E. Harris, G.E.
Principal
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 GENERAL 1
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1
1.3 PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2
3.0 SITE CONDITIONS 3
3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS 3
3.2 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 3
3.3 GROUNDWATER AND CAVING 3
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5
4.1 OVERVIEW 5
4.2 SEISMIC DESIGN 6
4.2.1 General 6
4.2.2 Strong Ground Motion Potential 6
4.2.3 Potential for Ground Rupture 7
4.2.4 Liquefaction 7
4.2.5 Lateral Spreading 7
4.2.6 Seismic Ground Subsidence 8
4.3 MITIGATION OF SETTLEMENT 8
4.4 EARTHWORK 10
4.4.1 Clearing and Grubbing 10
4.4.2 Excavations 11
4.4.3 Subgrade Preparation 12
4.4.4 Material for Fill 12
4.4.5 Placement and Compaction of Fills 13
4.4.6 Shrinkage and Subsidence 13
4.4.7 Trench/Wall Backfill 13
4.4.8 Observation and Testing 14
4.5 FOUNDATIONS 14
4.5.1 Pile Foundations 14
Axial Capacity 15
Lateral Capacity 16
Construction and Testing Considerations 16
4.5.2 Spread Footings 17
Minimum Footing Width and Embedment 17
Estimated Settlements 17
Lateral Load Resistance 18
4.5.3 Foundation Concrete 18
4.5.4 Foundation Observation 18
4.6 RETAINING STRUCTURES AND SHORING 18
4.6.1 Basement and Retaining Walls 18
4.6.2 Temporary Shoring 20
4.7 CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS 22
4.8 CORROSION 22
4.9 EXTERIOR CONCRETE AND MASONRY FLATWORK 22
4.10 SURFACE DRAINAGE 23
4.11 STORM WATER INFILTRATION 23
4.12 PAVED AREAS 23
4.13 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING 24
5.0 LIMITATIONS 25
REFERENCES
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22)
APPENDICES
A CONE PENETRATION TESTS
B EXPLORATORY BORINGS
C LABORATORY TESTS
D APG PILE SPECIFICATIONS
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO.
1 Lateral Pile Design Parameters
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO.
1 Site Location Map
2 Site Plan – Proposed Condition
3 Site Plan – Existing Condition
4 and 5 Proposed Building Section
APPENDIX A
Table A-1 Shear Wave Measurements
A-1 Cone Penetrometer Diagram
A-2 to A-6 Cone Penetrometer Test Results
APPENDIX B
B-1 to B-3 Logs of Borings
APPENDIX C
C-1 Atterberg Limits
C-2 to C-4 Direct Shear Test Results
C-5 to C-8 Consolidation Test Results
Table 1 Corrosivity Test Results
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
This report presents the results of a geotechnical investigation performed by Geotechnical Professionals Inc. (GPI) for the proposed mixed-use apartment development at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway in Long Beach, California. The site location is shown on the Site Location Map, Figure 1.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Based on project plans dated October 21, 2021 provided by AC Martin, the Project Architect, we understand that the proposed project will consist of a new 7-story mixed-use development. The structure will include 4-stories of wood framed apartments over 3 stories of concrete parking/metal-frame apartments/retail. The concrete parking includes 1 partially subterranean level. The parking levels will cover approximately 60,000 square feet. We understand the finish floor of the partially subterranean level will be at approximately Elevation +13 feet.
The proposed site configuration for the development is shown on the Site Plans, Figures 2 and 3. Proposed building profiles are included on Figures 4 and 5.
Structural loads were not available at the time we have prepared this report. Based on similar previous projects, we have assumed that maximum column loads for this concrete podium type building will be on the order of 500 to 700 kips.
Our recommendations are based upon the above structural and grading assumptions.
We should be notified if the actual loads and/or grades change during the project design to either confirm or modify our recommendations. Also, when the project grading, shoring, and foundation plans become available, we should be provided with a copy for review.
1.3 PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION
The primary purpose of this investigation and report is to provide an evaluation of the existing geotechnical conditions at the site as they relate to the design and construction of the proposed development.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 2
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope of work for this investigation consisted of review of existing data, field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and the preparation of this report.
GPI performed a geotechnical feasibility-level investigation (GPI, 2021) for the proposed development. The geotechnical data from our previous report is contained herein.
Our field investigation consisted of 5 cone penetration tests (CPT’s) and 3 exploratory borings. The CPT’s were performed to depths of 35 to 100 feet below existing grades.
The borings were drilled to a depth of 61 feet below existing grades. A description of field procedures and logs of the explorations are presented in Appendices A and B. The locations of the subsurface explorations are shown on the Site Plans, Figures 2 and 3.
Laboratory soil tests were performed on selected representative samples as an aid in soil classification and to evaluate the engineering properties of the soils. The geotechnical laboratory testing program used for this investigation included evaluations of in-place moisture content and dry density, Atterberg Limits, grain-size distribution, direct shear, consolidation, compaction, expansion potential, and corrosivity. Laboratory testing procedures and results are summarized in Appendix C.
Soil corrosivity testing was performed by HDR. This work was performed under subcontract to GPI. Their test results are presented in Appendix C.
Engineering evaluations were performed to provide earthwork criteria, foundation and slab design parameters, preliminary pavement sections and assessments of seismic hazards. The results of our evaluations are presented in the remainder of the report.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 3
3.0 SITE CONDITIONS
3.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS
The site is currently occupied by a 3-story office building with partial subterranean parking and at-grade parking. The current development was built in the early 1980’s. The site is bounded on the northeast by Pacific Coast Highway, on the northwest by Studebaker Road, on the southwest Marina Drive, and on the southeast by the San Gabriel River The site is located approximately 40 feet north of the San Gabriel River and approximately 315 feet northeast of the Alamitos Bay Marina. In general, the site slopes downward from the northeast to the southwest with ground surface elevations ranging from approximately +20 to +9 feet based on Google Earth. The project site slopes upward to Pacific Coast Highway by approximately 6 to 8 feet from the at-grade parking within the project site when approaching the San Gabriel River. The San Gabriel River consists of a sloped channel with riprap revetment. An access road for City vehicles separates the riprap revetment and the property limits of the project.
3.2 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS
Our field investigation disclosed a subsurface profile consisting of undocumented fill soils overlying natural soils. Detailed descriptions of the conditions encountered are shown on the Logs of CPT’s and Borings in Appendices A and B, respectively.
The fill soils extend to a depth of approximately 5 feet below existing grades at the locations of our exploratory borings. The fill soils consist of sandy silts and silty sands in our borings. In general, the moisture contents of these soils were moist to wet. The finegrained soils are generally firm to stiff, and the sandy soils are loose to medium dense.
Documentation regarding the placement and compaction of the fill was not provided.
The natural soils encountered below the undocumented fill soils consist of interbedded silty sands, sandy silts, clayey silts, silty clays, and clays to a depth of approximately 35 feet, and silty sands, sands, clayey silts, silty clays, and clayey sands from 35 feet to the 100 foot depth explored. In general, the near surface finer grained soils were soft to stiff and the sandy soils were medium dense. At depths greater than approximately 35 to 50 feet, the finer grained soils were firm to hard and the sandy soils were dense to very dense.
3.3 GROUNDWATER AND CAVING
Groundwater was encountered at a depth as shallow as 9 feet below existing grade in one of our explorations (C-1). Historical high groundwater levels are mapped to approximately 10 feet below the ground surface by the State of California in the site vicinity.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 4
A monitoring well was installed near the southern corner of the site at an approximate elevation of +13 feet during our investigation at the site. We periodically monitored the well after our field work. The groundwater level recorded ranged from approximately 11 to 13 feet below existing grades. This groundwater level correlates with the tidal level within the San Gabriel River. The water level should be observed during the “King” tides during December and January to ensure the highest groundwater level is considered during design.
Caving was observed in our borings and will likely occur in sand layers below groundwater.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 5
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 OVERVIEW
Based on the results of our investigation, it is our opinion that from a geotechnical viewpoint it is feasible to develop the site as proposed. The structure will need to be supported on either pile foundations and a structural floor slab or another type of ground improvement for the reasons described below. The most significant geotechnical issues that will affect the design and construction of the proposed structure are as follows:
• There is a potential for liquefaction induced seismic settlement to adversely impact the buildings. Layers of silty and sandy soil between depths of approximately 9 to 60 feet below existing grade exhibit a significant potential for liquefaction from a design earthquake. Should liquefaction of these layers occur, we estimate the magnitude of induced settlement is expected to be up to 5½ inches. • Due to the settlements of potentially liquefiable soils and static settlement of shallow or mat foundations, we recommend a deep pile foundation system supporting the columns and a structural floor slab for the proposed structure. Piles will need to be designed to resist the structural loads of the building and downdrag forces on the pile caused by liquefaction.
• Overexcavation of the undocumented fills and upper compressible soils will not be required below the building pad for the concrete podium building provided that the structure is supported on pile foundations with a structural floor slab. • Near surface soils exhibit high moisture contents. Stabilization of excavation bottom in the building pad may be required to create a working surface.
Stabilization can be achieved using geogrid/aggregate base or chemical (cement or lime treatment).
• Deeper trench and tank excavations may be difficult due to groundwater and caving soils.
• Guidelines for storm water infiltration by the County of Los Angeles do not allow infiltration into potentially liquefiable soils, and state that infiltration should be at least 10 feet higher than the seasonally high groundwater. As such, storm water infiltration is not feasible at the site.
• The on-site soils should be considered severely corrosive to buried metals.
Additionally, chloride levels were found to be high.
Our recommendations related to the geotechnical aspects of the development of the site are presented in the subsequent sections of this report.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 6
4.2 SEISMIC DESIGN
4.2.1 General
The site is located in a seismically active area typical of Southern California and is likely to be subjected to strong ground shaking due to earthquakes on nearby faults.
We assume the seismic design of the proposed development will be in accordance with the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) criteria. A Site Class D may be used for design in accordance with the 2019 CBC. This site class was determined using the average shear wave velocity data measured in a CPT (see Table A-1) during our investigation.
The weighted average velocity was calculated to be approximately 750 ft/sec. Using the Site Class and the appropriate internet website (seismicmaps.org), the corresponding seismic design parameters from the CBC can be determined by the Project Structural Engineer.
In accordance with the 2019 CBC, site-specific response spectra are required for structures located in a Site Class D (with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2), unless per the exceptions detailed in Section 11.4 8 of ASCE 7-16 (ASCE, 2017), the structure is designed using seismic response coefficient (Cs) determined by either:
• Equation 12.8-2 for values of T ≤ 1.5 TS,
• 1.5 times the value computed by Equation 12.8-3 for values of TL ≥ T > 1.5 TS, or • 1.5 times the value computed by Equation 12.8-4 for values of T > TL.
If this exception is not taken and the structure will still be designed in accordance with the 2019 CBC, GPI should be notified that a site-specific response spectra is required.
4.2.2 Strong Ground Motion Potential
Based on published information (geohazards.usgs.gov), the most significant fault in the proximity of the site is the Newport-Inglewood Fault, which is located about 0.3 miles from the site.
During the life of the project, the site will likely be subject to strong ground motions due to earthquakes on nearby faults. Based on the SEAOC/OSHPD website (SEAOC, 2020), we computed that the site could be subjected to a peak ground acceleration (PGAM) of
0.74g for a mean magnitude 6.9 earthquake. This acceleration has been computed using the mapped Maximum Considered Geometric Mean peak ground acceleration from ASCE 7-16 and a site coefficient (FPGA) based on site class. The predominant earthquake magnitude was determined using a 2-percent probability of exceedance in a 50-year period, or an average return period of 2,475 years. The structural design will need to incorporate measures to mitigate the effects of strong ground motion.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 7
4.2.3 Potential for Ground Rupture
There are no known active faults crossing or projecting through the site. The site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely at this site.
4.2.4 Liquefaction
Soil liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated cohesionless soils undergo a temporary loss of strength during severe ground shaking and acquire a degree of mobility sufficient to permit ground deformation. In extreme cases, the soil particles can become suspended in groundwater, resulting in the soil deposit becoming mobile and fluid-like.
Liquefaction is generally considered to occur primarily in loose to medium dense deposits of saturated soils. Thus, three conditions are required for liquefaction to occur: (1) a cohesionless soil of loose to medium density; (2) a saturated condition; and (3) rapid large strain, cyclic loading, normally provided by earthquake motions.
The site is located within a zone identified as having a potential for liquefaction by the State (CGS, 1999). We evaluated the potential for liquefaction using methods presented in Robertson, 2009 (Robertson, 2009) and modifications provided in Special Publication 117A (CGS, 1997). The California Building Code (CBC), ASCE 7-16 (ASCE 2017), and Special Publication 117A (CGS, 1997) requires that the ground motion used for liquefaction evaluation be based on the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGAM) adjusted for site class effects. Accordingly, we used a ground acceleration of 0.74g for a magnitude
6.9 earthquake for our analyses. Based on our field data at the site, we used a groundwater level of 9 feet in our analysis.
Based on our evaluation of the CPT data using computer software CLIQ (GeoLogismiki, 2007), should a design earthquake occur, the soils within thin layers exhibit a potential for liquefaction induced seismic settlement between the depths below grade of approximately 9 to 60 feet. The majority of the liquefaction induced seismic settlement occurs at depths less than approximately 42 feet below existing grade. In general, the potentially liquefiable layers consist of medium dense silty sands and soft to stiff finegrained material. Total liquefaction-induced settlement is estimated to be up to 5½ inches, with differential settlement expected between up to 2¾-inches across a span of 40 feet.
4.2.5 Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading is defined as the horizontal movement of soils resulting from the loss of shear strength during liquefaction combined with either a sloping ground surface or a nearby free-face condition. Conditions contributing to the potential for lateral spreading include the extent and severity of liquefaction, grain size of liquefiable materials, distance to the causative fault, and extent of surficial grade changes.
The project site has gentle slope away from a free-face condition at the San Gabriel River.
The distance from the project limits to the top of the free-face is approximately 10 to 15 Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 8
feet. These conditions along with the liquefaction potential of underlying soils are consistent with areas that may be subject to lateral spreading.
We analyzed the potential for lateral spreading based on Zhang, 2004 (Zhang, 2004).
The method was utilized by using Cliq. For lateral spreading to occur, the layers subject to liquefaction need to be continuous across the site. Based upon our evaluation, our field explorations encountered one continuous layer of sandy soils which exhibit the potential for liquefaction. The continuous layer ranges in depths from approximately 20 to 30 feet.
Based on our analysis, we estimate lateral spreading to be on the order of 10 to 15 inches.
Holland should be aware of the risk associated with the potential of lateral spreading. The potential for lateral spreading likely impacts the entire area surrounding the project site.
Mitigating the impact of lateral spreading should it occur during a design seismic event (2-percent probability of exceedance in a 50-year period) would require deep ground improvement both within the project site and in the adjoining properties and City streets, which is not feasible.
Supporting the structure on deep foundations will lessen the impact of lateral spreading should it occur during a design seismic event. Larger diameter piles will also lessen the potential impact of lateral spreading on the building. Further ground improvement mitigation measures to help mitigate the potential for lateral spreading, such as multiple rows of soil-cement columns, could be constructed between the apartments and the river in order to lessen the future risks beyond supporting the building on deep foundations.
However, the effectiveness of ground improvement installed locally at the site to mitigate a more area-wide problem is questionable. Due to the site being relatively narrow directly adjacent to the river embankment, impacts of lateral spreading on the remaining limits of the site would likely be impacted by the lateral spreading in the adjacent properties.
Holland should consult with specialty ground improvement contractors to better understand the costs associated with mitigation to reduce risks to the building or satisfy local regulatory requirements.
4.2.6 Seismic Ground Subsidence
Seismic ground subsidence (not related to liquefaction induced settlements), occurs when loose, granular (sandy) soils above the groundwater are densified during strong earthquake shaking. Earthquake-induced seismic subsidence during a strong earthquake is not anticipated to adversely affect the planned project because the on-site soils below the proposed subterranean foundation level and above the groundwater are limited and predominantly silts, clays, and medium dense silty sands.
4.3 MITIGATION OF SETTLEMENT
The site soil profile includes compressible and liquefiable soils in the upper 40 to 50 feet that will adversely impact the structure. The placement of new fill or structural loads will cause significant long-term settlement of these upper materials. Static settlement of shallow foundations for the proposed building would be on the order of 3 to 5 inches with typical remedial grading under the foundations. As discussed previously, the seismic settlement due to liquefaction is anticipated to be up to 5½ inches in the event of a design Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 9
level earthquake. Static settlement of a mat foundation for the proposed building would be on the order of 1 to 1½ inches. However, the seismic settlement discussed above would need to be added to the static settlement of mat foundation. Typically, Structural Engineers will limit buildings supported on spread footings and a slab-on-grade floor slabs to total settlement (static and seismic) on the order of 1½ inches and mat foundations to total settlements (static and seismic) of 4 inches or less. The maximum total combined settlements described above are beyond the typical performance of shallow or mat foundations.
The potential building settlement under both static and earthquake loads could be mitigated with pile foundations. The pile foundations could consist of conventional driven concrete piles, Auger Pressure Grouted (APG) piles, or other proprietary pile types. The pile foundations would mitigate the static and dynamic settlement by extending below the liquefiable soils into a dense sand bearing material. The pile designs will need to account for the down drag forces due to dynamic settlement above the majority of liquefiable soils.
Piles will need to extend to depths of greater than 65 feet below existing grades to derive support from end bearing. Due to the noise and vibration associated with driven piles, we assume that driven piles are not an acceptable alternative with the nearby residential, restaurants, boat slips, and retail businesses. Preliminary recommendations for APG pile foundations are provided in Section 4.5. APG piles are typically designed, built, and installed by specialty pile contractors.
We also reviewed ground modification methods to control settlements for the multi-story concrete podium building planned at the site. We reviewed typical methods used in Southern California such as rammed aggregate piers (Geopiers), vibro-replacement (stone columns) and deep soil mixing (soil-cement columns). Geopiers consist of drilled holes that are filled with aggregate base that is mechanically compacted as it is placed.
Geopiers typically reduces the extent of remedial grading and anticipated static settlements. Vibro-replacement utilizes a large vibrating probe (mandrel) to create a cavity which is filled with gravel or crushed stone, and compacted as the mandrel is removed. The result is a stone column with the stone pushed laterally into the soil. The stone columns provide lower compressibility and higher shear strength while improving drainage. Stone columns can reduce both anticipated static and seismic settlement.
Deep soil mixing involves the creation of soil/cement mixed columns extending through the soft compressible soil deposits. The resultant is similar to that of stone columns in that the method results in lower compressibility and increased shear strengths. Deep soil mixing can reduce both anticipated static and seismic settlement.
Geopiers will not be effective at this site due to limitations in the depth of installation and their inability to densify surrounding soils to mitigate the magnitude of dynamic settlement due to liquefaction anticipated at the site. Stone columns are generally effective if the soils to be densified are sands containing less than 15 to 20 percent fines. However, significant liquefiable soils layers at the site consist of silty sands with fine contents greater than 20 percent. Deep soil mixing could be effective in mitigation of the liquefaction at the site as well as lessening the impact of lateral spreading. Past experience at similar sites with significant layers of clays indicated that the amount of cement or multiple treatments required within thick clay layers could make this method difficult.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 10
Stone columns and deep soil mixing are also construction methods that cause significant ground water intrusion upward to the ground surface. Additionally, these construction activities generally cause significant noise and vibration that would impact the nearby residents and businesses.
Ground improvement is typically performed on a design-build basis by the specialty contractor. Ground improvement contractors should determine if the liquefaction potential at the site can be mitigated sufficiently to support the building on spread footings or a mat foundation. The design and construction of the ground improvement is the sole responsibility of the specialty design-build contractor. In addition, foundation design parameters, including estimated settlements of footings bearing on ground improvement must be provided by the design-build contractor. Our design review is typically limited to confirming that the soil parameters used are consistent with the data provided in this report. A representative of GPI should observe the installation of the ground improvement.
The placement of new fill above the existing grade will cause about ½ inches of settlement at the ground surface for every 1-foot of fill placed beyond an initial fill height of 3 feet.
We anticipate that the majority of the settlement will be completed in 90 days. Where fill placement resulting in higher grades is planned, it should be placed as early as possible with respect to construction of buildings (including piles) and utilities to allow the areal settlement to occur. We recommend that settlement caused by raising grades beyond 3 feet from existing grade be monitored by GPI with a series of monuments placed and surveyed prior to placing the fill. Construction of the gravity utilities or piles should not begin until the building have been released for construction at the direction of GPI.
4.4 EARTHWORK
The earthwork anticipated at the project site will consist of demolition of existing structures, clearing and grubbing, excavation for the partial subterranean building level, subgrade preparation, and the placement and compaction of fill.
4.4.1 Clearing and Grubbing
Prior to grading, performing excavations, or constructing the proposed improvements, the areas to be developed should be stripped of vegetation and cleared of existing structures, debris, and pavements. Buried obstructions, such as footings, abandoned utilities, and tree roots should be removed from areas to be developed. Deleterious material generated during the clearing operation, including organic topsoil, should be removed from the site. If approved by the owner and regulatory agency, inert demolition debris, such as concrete and asphalt may be crushed for reuse in engineered fills outside the planned building areas in accordance with the criteria presented in the "Materials for Fill" section of this report.
Portions of the existing building at the site may be supported on concrete piles. If encountered, we recommend the piles be removed to a depth of 5 feet below the proposed pile caps or 2 feet below the slabs for the proposed building. The existing piles below these depths should not be disturbed. The upper portions of the piles should be Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 11
cutoff. Heavy equipment should not be used to break off the piles. The location and depth to the top of the piles should be surveyed during demolition. The results of the survey should be provided to the Project Structural Engineer designing the foundations of the new structures. New deep foundations for the proposed building may need to be adjusted based upon existing pile locations. The resulting excavation should be backfilled as recommended in the “Subgrade Preparation” and “Placement and Compaction of Fill” sections of this report.
If cesspools or septic systems are encountered during grading, they should be removed in their entirety. The resulting excavation should be backfilled as recommended in the "Subgrade Preparation" and "Placement and Compaction of Fill" sections of this report.
As an alternative, cesspools can be backfilled with lean sand-cement slurry (two-sack).
At the conclusion of the clearing operations, a representative of GPI should observe and accept the site prior to further grading.
4.4.2 Excavations
Excavations at this site will include the partially subterranean building excavation, footing/pile cap excavations, and trenching for new utility lines.
The moisture content of the on-site soils at the anticipated bottom of the partially subterranean level are expected to be very moist to wet. The wet soils anticipated at the excavation bottom may be unstable when subjected to heavy construction equipment.
At this time, it is our opinion that stabilization of a significant portion of the excavation bottom using aggregate base/geogrid or cement treatment may be required to support heavy construction equipment. For stabilization with aggregate base/geogrid, we expect that 12 to 18 inches of aggregate base over a geogrid will be required. If cement treatment is used, we expect that approximately a minimum of 4 to 6 percent cement, by weight, will be required. A contractor specializing in cement treatment, such as Pavement Recyclers, should be consulted for details of this process.
For minor at-grade supported structures, such as screen walls, canopies, or short retaining walls, the footings be underlain by at least 2 feet of properly compacted fill over competent soils. Where space is available, the base of the overexcavation should extend laterally a distance at least equal to the depth of removal below footings.
Where not removed by the aforementioned excavations, existing utility trench backfill should be removed and replaced as properly compacted fill. This is especially important for deeper fills associated with existing sewers and storm drains. For planning purposes, removals over the utilities should extend to within 1-foot of the top of the pipe. For utilities, which are 5 feet or shallower, the removal should extend laterally 1-foot beyond both sides of the pipe. For deeper utilities, the removals should include a zone defined by a 1:1 projection upward (and away from the pipe) from each side of the pipe. The actual limits of removal will need to be confirmed in the field. We recommend that all known utilities be shown on the grading plan.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 12
Temporary construction excavations may be made vertically without shoring to a depth of 4 feet below the adjacent grade. For cuts up to 15 feet, the slopes should be properly shored or sloped back to at least 1:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter. The inclination is measured from the top to toe of slope, and we do not recommend incorporating a vertical cut at the base of the slope. The exposed slope face should be kept moist (but not saturated) during construction to reduce local sloughing. Surcharge loads should not be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut from the top of the excavation or 5 feet from the top of the slopes, whichever is greater, unless the cut is properly shored. Excavations that extend below an imaginary plane inclined at 45 degrees below the edge of the adjacent existing site facilities should be properly shored to maintain support of adjacent elements. Excavations and shoring systems should meet the minimum requirements given in the most current State of California Occupational Safety and Health Standards.
4.4.3 Subgrade Preparation
After removals are complete and prior to placing fills or construction of the proposed structures, the subgrade soils should be scarified to a depth of 8 inches, moistureconditioned, and compacted to dry densities equal to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density, determined in accordance with ASTM D1557.
In areas where very moist to wet soils are encountered, scarification of the subgrade may be omitted.
4.4.4 Material for Fill
The on-site soils are, in general, suitable for use as compacted fill under the structures.
Clayey soils (if encountered) should not be used directly underneath exterior flatwork.
Imported fill material should be predominately granular (containing no more than 40 percent fines - portion passing No. 200 sieve) and non-expansive (E.I. of 20 or less).
Import or on-site materials used in compacted fills should not contain particles larger than 6 inches in diameter. GPI should be provided with a sample (at least 50 pounds) and notified of the location of soils proposed for import at least 72 hours in advance of importing. Each proposed import source should be sampled, tested and accepted for use prior to delivery of the soils to the site. Soils imported prior to acceptance by GPI may be rejected if not suitable.
On-site inert demolition debris, such as concrete and asphalt, may be reused in the compacted fills provided approval is obtained from the reviewing regulatory agency and the Owner. The material should be crushed to the consistency of aggregate base.
Soils used for compacted fills should not contain particles greater than 3 inches in largest dimension.
If open-graded rock is used as backfill, the material should be placed in lifts and mechanically densified. Open-graded rock should be separated from the on-site soils by a suitable filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent).
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 13
4.4.5 Placement and Compaction of Fills
Fill soils consisting of the on-site materials should be placed in horizontal lifts, moisture-conditioned, and mechanically compacted to densities equal to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density, determined in accordance with ASTM D1557.
The optimum lift thickness will depend on the compaction equipment used and can best be determined in the field. The following uncompacted lift thickness can be used as preliminary guidelines.
Plate compactors 4-6 inches
Small vibratory or static rollers (5-ton±) or track equipment 6-8 inches Heavy loaders, or heavy vibratory rollers 8-12 inches
The maximum lift thickness should not be greater than 12 inches and each lift should be thoroughly compacted and accepted prior to subsequent lifts.
Fills consisting of the on-site silts and clays should be placed at a moisture content of 1 to 3 percent over the optimum moisture content in order to achieve the required compaction and reduce the potential for future swelling. On-site or imported granular fills should be placed at a moisture content of 0 to 2 percent over the optimum moisture content. A portion of the soils at the site are well over optimum such that significant drying should be anticipated.
Once moisture conditioned and properly compacted, the exposed soils should not be allowed to dry out prior to covering with concrete. A representative of GPI should confirm the moisture content of the subgrade soils immediately prior to placement of concrete or additional fill.
During backfill of excavations, the fill should be properly benched into the construction slopes as it is placed in lifts.
4.4.6 Shrinkage and Subsidence
Shrinkage is the loss of soil volume caused by compaction of fills to a higher density than before grading. Subsidence is the settlement of in-place subgrade soils caused by loads generated by large earthmoving equipment. Neither shrinkage nor subsidence is anticipated to be a major factor on the project because of the significant soil export.
However, for earthwork volume estimating purposes an average shrinkage value of 10 to 15 percent and subsidence of less than 0.1 feet may be assumed for the surficial soils.
These values are estimates only and exclude losses due to removal of vegetation or debris. Actual shrinkage and subsidence will depend on the types of earthmoving equipment used and should be verified during grading.
4.4.7 Trench/Wall Backfill
Utility trench and wall backfill, consisting of the on-site materials or imported sand, should be mechanically compacted in lifts. Lift thickness should not exceed those values given in the "Compacted Fill" section of this report. Moisture conditioning (drying) of the deeper Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 14
on-site soils will likely be required prior to re-use as backfill. Jetting or flooding of backfill materials should not be permitted. GPI should observe and test trench and wall backfills as they are placed.
In backfill areas where mechanical compaction of soil backfill is impractical due to space constraints, sand-cement slurry may be substituted for compacted backfill. The slurry should contain one sack of cement per cubic yard and have a maximum slump of 5 inches. Within building areas, the slurry should contain two sacks of cement per cubic yard.
Open-graded rock used for bedding should be separated from the on-site soils by a suitable filter fabric (Mirafi 140N or equivalent).
4.4.8 Observation and Testing
A representative of GPI should observe excavations, subgrade preparation, and fill placement activities. Sufficient in-place field density tests should be performed during fill placement and in-place compaction to evaluate the overall compaction of the soils. Soils that do not meet minimum compaction requirements should be reworked and tested prior to placement of additional fill.
4.5 FOUNDATIONS
4.5.1 Pile Foundations
The proposed concrete podium building may be supported on piles to help mitigate excessive total and differential settlement (static and seismic). We have provided preliminary recommendations for18-inch diameter APG piles for foundation support of the building.
APG piles derive their support from a combination of friction and end-bearing in the dense to very dense sands at depth. APG piles are more flexible than driven piles with respect to pile length and the potential need for pile cut-offs when refusal in very dense materials is encountered.
The APG piles are typically designed, built, and installed by specialty design-build pile contractors. All aspects of the design, construction, and performance verification of such systems are the responsibility of the registered engineer designing the system. The final foundation design including embedment depths, downdrag loads, allowable capacities and estimated settlements must be provided by the design-build pile contractor. The actual capacities used for design will need to be based on full-scale load tests and the structural design of the piles by the design-build pile contractor.
Other proprietary pile alternatives may be considered for the project. The most suitable pile alternative will be based on the economies of each system, the anticipated column loads, soil conditions, and environmental limitations, such as noise and vibration.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 15
Axial Capacity
Based on our CPT data, we recommend using allowable pile capacities for APG piles end bearing into dense to very dense sands at depths of approximately 65 or 85 feet below existing grade at the site. The allowable capacities are estimated using the end bearing resistance of dense sands and side friction resistance below a depth of 42 feet below the existing grade.
The following estimates for axial design capacities are provided for information only to develop preliminary cost estimates for the structures:
Preliminary Estimate of Pile Embedment and Allowable Capacity 18-inch Diameter APG Pile
Pile Tip Below
Existing Grade (ft)
Allowable Axial
Compressive Pile Capacity
(kips)
65 250
85 400
A factor of safety of 2 for both skin and tip resistance was used to determine the allowable compressive pile capacities presented above.
Due to the liquefiable soils at the site, a downdrag load should be added to the dead and live load of the piles during earthquake loading conditions. The downdrag load results from the downward skin friction of the pile caused from overlying settlement above the liquefiable soils. Based on the magnitude and depths of the liquefiable soils, we estimate the downdrag loads from the piles will occur at depths above 42 feet below existing grade.
Based on the residual shear strength characteristics of the soils above 42 feet, we recommend a downdrag load of 100 kips for an 18-inch diameter APG pile be used for the design of foundations.
To resist uplift loads, the piles will derive their resistance from friction between the subsurface soils and the pile surface. Preliminary allowable uplift capacity of 18-inch diameter APG piles may be taken as 180 kips for piles embedded to 65 feet below existing grades and 300 kips for piles embedded to 85 kips below existing grades. A factor of safety of 3 was used to determine the allowable uplift capacity. The weight of the piles may be added to the allowable capacities to evaluate the total uplift resistance.
The pile capacities may be increased by up to one-third for short-term wind and seismic forces or other transient loading conditions.
Settlement of the piles is expected to be less than ½-inch.
Group effects should be considered on the axial capacity of piles where center-to-center spacing is less than 3 times the pile diameter.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 16
Lateral Capacity
The lateral capacities of the piles will be provided by the design-build pile contractor which will, in part, be controlled by the axial loads on the piles.
We performed a preliminary analysis for the lateral load response of 18-inch diameter APG piles using LPILE, a finite difference computer program. The soil is modeled as a series of non-linear lateral springs, with lateral response defined by segmentally-variable p-y curves. The lateral capacity of the piles will depend on the permissible deflection and on the degree of fixity at the top of the pile. For an 18-inch diameter APG pile, preliminary allowable values of 7.0 and 14.3 kips for the free and fixed head condition, respectively, can be assumed for a deflection of ¼ inch.
Lateral loads may be resisted by the piles and passive resistance of the soils against the pile cap. An allowable lateral bearing pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 250 pounds per cubic foot may be used, provided the footings are poured tight against the natural soils above the groundwater.
Preliminary lateral capacities for other pile diameters and deflections can be provided upon request. When the final pile configuration is determined, deflection, shear and moment curves for the piles can be provided.
The design parameters in Table 1 can be used by the design-build pile contractor in lateral load analyses, using programs such as LPILE, with a desired head deflection and fixity to determine the lateral capacity of the pile for the various quadrants of the project.
The unit soil weight, cohesion, internal friction angle, strain, and lateral subgrade modulus provided in Table 1 are based upon our exploration data, published values, and our experience with similar materials.
Group effects should be considered on the lateral behavior of piles where center-to-center spacing is less than 8 times the pile diameter.
Construction and Testing Considerations
We recommend at least 2 full scale load tests be performed at the site. Test piles should be located in areas where boring or CPT data are available.
We recommend performing Thermal Integrity Profiling (TIP) to confirm the integrity of the test and reaction piles. It is our opinion that TIP provides definitive integrity assessments and less inconclusive anomalies than the gamma gamma testing. The TIP testing should be performed in accordance with ASTM D7949. We recommend that a qualified independent engineering firm specializing in pile integrity testing be retained to perform these services.
After completion of the static pile load test and prior to the installation of production piles, supplemental recommendations based on the load test data should be prepared for confirmation or revision to the preliminary pile capacities provided above. The Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 17
supplemental report should be submitted to the proper regulatory agency for review and approval.
Unless used as production piles, the test and reaction piles used for the load testing should be cut-off at least 3 feet below the bottom of the structure concrete pavements (slab). Prior to backfilling over the pile, a representative of GPI should observe the pile and confirm that the minimum cut-off has been achieved.
Appendix D includes a sample specification of APG piles.
The installation of the APG piles should be observed under the direct supervision of GPI.
4.5.2 Conventional Spread Footings
For minor at-grade structures, a static allowable net bearing pressure of up to 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for both continuous footings or isolated column footings based on the shear strength and elastic settlement characteristics of the recompacted on-site soils.
These bearing pressures are for dead-plus-live loads, and may be increased one-third for short-term, transient, wind and seismic loading. The actual bearing pressure used may be less, such that economics and structural loads will determine the minimum width for footings as discussed below. The maximum edge pressures induced by eccentric loading or overturning moments should not be allowed to exceed these recommended values.
Minimum Footing Width and Embedment
For foundations bearing on properly compacted fill soils, minimum footing widths and embedments presented below are recommended.
ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURES
STATIC BEARING
PRESSURE
(psf)
MINIMUM FOOTING
WIDTH
(inches)
MINIMUM FOOTING*
EMBEDMENT
(inches)
2,000 24 24
1,500 12 18
* Depth to bottom of footing below lowest adjacent finish grade.
A minimum footing width and depth of 12 inches should be used even if the actual bearing pressure is less than 1,500 psf.
Estimated Settlements
Total static settlement for the minor structures is expected to be less than 1-inch.
Maximum differential settlements are expected to be up to ½-inch across a distance of 40 feet.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 18
The above estimates are based on the assumption that the recommended earthwork will be performed and that the footings will be sized in accordance with our recommendations.
The above estimates are based on the assumption that the recommended earthwork will be performed and that the footings will be sized in accordance with our recommendations.
Lateral Load Resistance
Soil resistance to lateral loads will be provided by a combination of frictional resistance between the bottom of footings and underlying soils and by passive soil pressures acting against the embedded sides of the footings. For frictional resistance, a coefficient of friction of 0.30 may be used for design. In addition, an allowable lateral bearing pressure equal to an equivalent fluid weight of 275 pounds per cubic foot may be used, provided the footings are poured tight against the compacted fill. These values may be used in combination without reduction.
4.5.3 Foundation Concrete
Laboratory testing by HDR (Appendix C) indicates that the near surface soils exhibit a soluble sulfate content of 540mg/kg (0.054 percent by weight). For the 2019 CBC, foundation concrete should conform to the requirements outlined in ACI 318, Section 4.3, for negligible levels of soluble sulfate exposure from the on-site soils, (Category S0).
Chloride levels in the on-site soils were found to be high (225 ppm). For concrete exposed to soil moisture and potentially saltwater, such as piles, footings, and floor slabs, we recommend a chloride Category C2.
4.5.4 Foundation Observation
Prior to placement of concrete and steel, a representative of GPI should observe and approve foundation excavations and observe installation of the piles.
4.6 RETAINING STRUCTURES AND SHORING
Basement walls, cantilever retaining walls and temporary shoring are planned for the site.
The following recommendations are provided for walls and shoring that do not extend more than 15 feet in height. We recommend that conventionally constructed walls be backfilled with sandy (granular) soils.
4.6.1 Basement and Retaining Walls
Active pressure may be used in the designing of walls that can yield at least ½-inch laterally in 10 feet of wall height under imposed loads. For cantilever walls with level, backfill comprised of drained granular soils, the magnitude of active pressures is equivalent to the pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
For cantilever walls with level, backfill comprised of drained natural soils, the magnitude of active pressures is equivalent to the pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 19
At-rest pressures should be used for restrained walls that remain rigid enough to be essentially non-yielding such as basement walls. For basement walls conventionally backfilled with granular soils, at-rest pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 55 pounds per cubic foot should be used for retaining level, drained granular soils at the site. For basement walls against shored excavations, at-rest pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 66 pounds per cubic foot should be used for retaining level, drained natural soils at the site.
The following pressures should be used to design the basement walls if they are waterproofed and designed to resist hydrostatic pressure. At-rest pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 94 pounds per cubic foot should be used for retaining level, undrained natural soils.
To account for seismic load an additional lateral earth pressure equal to 25 pcf (equivalent fluid pressure distribution) should be added to the active pressures of the soils. If the walls are designed using the above at-rest pressure, the added seismic load plus at-rest pressures can be limited to 70 pcf for drained natural soils for the site. The added seismic load plus at-rest pressures can be limited to 97 pcf for undrained natural soils for the site.
Walls subject to surcharge loads should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure equal to one-third and one-half the anticipated surcharge pressure for unrestrained and restrained walls, respectively. The subterranean wall of the building adjacent to the parking structure in the adjacent property should be designed for the surcharge load of the parking structure footings. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the upper 10 feet of the walls adjacent to the streets should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 100 pounds per square foot, acting as a result of an assumed 300 pound per square foot surcharge behind the basement walls due to normal street traffic. If traffic is kept at least 10 feet from the walls, the traffic surcharge may be neglected.
Construction equipment, such as cranes, concrete trucks, or loaders supported on the ground adjacent to the walls can impose lateral surcharge loads if they are supported adjacent to the basement walls. Therefore, surcharge effects from such equipment will need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and, if needed, the walls locally reinforced to support the surcharge from such loads.
The recommended pressures for drained conditions are based on the assumption that the supported earth will be fully drained, preventing the build-up of hydrostatic pressures.
For traditional backfilled retaining walls, a drain consisting of perforated pipe and gravel wrapped in filter fabric should be used. One cubic foot of rock should be used for each lineal foot of pipe. The fabric (non-woven filter fabric, Mirafi 140N or equivalent) should be lapped at the top. We prefer pipe and gravel drains to weep holes to avoid potential for constant flow of surface water in front of the wall. For retaining walls constructed adjacent to temporary shoring, a composite geotextile drain may be used with a manifoldtype collection drain at the base. A representative of GPI should observe and approve wall drains prior to placement of wall backfill.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 20
The Structural Engineer should specify the use of select, granular wall backfill on the plans for walls that are to be conventionally backfilled. Wall footings should be designed as discussed in the "Foundations" section.
4.6.2 Temporary Shoring
Where there is not sufficient space for sloped embankments and slot cuts are not practical, which is anticipated along the property limits on all sides of the proposed building, shoring will be required. One method of shoring would consist of steel soldier piles placed in drilled holes, backfilled with concrete, and, while not anticipated, tied-back with earth anchors. Driven or vibrated soldier piles may also be more economical alternative to drilled holes.
For cantilever shoring with level backfill, the magnitude of active pressure is equivalent to the pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 38 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). For cantilever shoring with 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) sloping backfill, such as along Pacific Coast Highway, the magnitude of active pressure is equivalent to the pressures imposed by a fluid weighing 60 pounds per cubic foot (pcf).
In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the shoring should be designed for surcharge loads due the adjacent structures and construction traffic surcharge loads. The upper 10 feet of the shoring adjacent to streets should be designed to resist a uniform lateral pressure of 100 pounds per square foot, acting as a result of an assumed 300 pound per square foot surcharge behind the shoring due to normal street traffic. If traffic is kept at least 10 feet from the shoring, the traffic surcharge may be neglected. The parking structure on the adjacent property will impart a surcharge load on shoring. The location and depth of the parking structure footings as well of the loading will need to be determined to estimate the surcharge pressure on the shoring.
For design of soldier piles spaced at least two diameters on centers, the allowable lateral bearing value (passive value) of the soils below the excavation may be taken to be 550 pounds per square foot at the excavated surface, up to a maximum of 5,500 psf. To develop the full lateral value, provisions should be made to assure firm contact between the soldier piles and the undisturbed soils. The concrete placed in the soldier pile excavation below the excavated level may be a lean mix, but it should be of adequate strength to transfer the imposed loads to the surrounding soils.
The shoring contractor should evaluate the potential drilling conditions, including the groundwater level, when planning the installation methods. Moderate to severe caving may be encountered below the groundwater.
To improve production or minimize ground vibration during driving of soldier piles, predrilling down to the design elevation of the excavation bottom is acceptable, provided that a continuous flight auger is utilized to enable reversing the auger to minimize the removal of soil during the process. If soil is removed during the predrilling process, the resulting void should be backfilled with 1½ sack sand-cement slurry. The diameter of the auger used for predrilling should not exceed 80 percent of the maximum depth of the soldier pile beam section.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 21
The frictional resistance between the soldier piles and the retained earth may be used in resisting the downward component of the anchor load, if used. The coefficient of friction between the soldier pile and the retained earth may be taken as 0.30. This value is based on the assumption that uniform full bearing will be developed between the steel soldier beam and the lean-mix concrete and between the lean mix concrete and the retained earth. In addition, provided the portion of the soldier piles below the excavated level is backfilled with structural concrete, the soldier piles below the excavated level may be used to resist downward loads. The frictional resistance between the concrete soldier piles and the soils below the excavated level may be taken as equal to 500 pounds per square foot.
Continuous lagging will be required between the soldier piles. Careful installation of the lagging will be necessary to achieve bearing against the retained earth. We recommend that the voids between the lagging and retained earth be backfilled with a lean-mix sand cement slurry prior to continuing the excavation deeper. The soldier piles should be designed for the full anticipated lateral pressure. However, the pressure on the lagging will be less because of arching of the soils between piles. We recommend that the lagging be designed for the recommended earth pressure but limited to a maximum value of 400 pounds per square foot, provided the soldier beam spacing is 8 feet or less.
It is difficult to accurately predict the amount of deflection of the shored embankment. It should be realized, however, that some deflection will occur. Shoring directly adjacent to city right-of-way should be designed to limited deflection to 1 inch. If greater deflection occurs during construction, additional bracing may be necessary. In areas where less deflection is desired, such as adjacent to existing settlement sensitive improvements, the shoring should be designed for higher lateral earth pressures. We recommend limiting the lateral deflection of shoring adjacent to any buildings or other sensitive structures (within a 1:1 plane projected up from the base of the excavation) to ½ inch.
Ground vibrations should be monitored when driving/vibrating soldier piles adjacent to sensitive structures within 20 feet from the excavation. A seismograph should be used to measure peak particle velocities (PPV) at the ground surface of the structures of concern. We suggest a maximum allowable PPV of 0.5 inches per second be used as a threshold value unless a lower value is required by the adjacent property owners.
Measures should be taken to reduce vibrations if PPV limits are exceeded. Such measures could include altering the predrilling methods or changing to the installation of the soldier piles in a drilled and grouted hole.
We recommend performing a detailed survey of the improvements to be supported above the planned shoring prior to and during the shoring installation. The survey should include topographic data and a video account of the condition of the existing improvements, including cracks or signs of distress. During construction, the monitoring should consist of periodic surveying of the lateral and vertical locations of the tops of the soldier piles.
We suggest weekly readings during the excavation and for the first three weeks after achieving the bottom of the excavation. After that time, the readings should be performed every other week until the completion of the basement walls.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 22
4.7 CONCRETE FLOOR SLABS
A structural floor slab will be required to span the compressive and liquefiable soils.
A moisture vapor retarder should be placed under slabs (including structural floor slabs) that are to be covered with moisture-sensitive floor coverings (wood, vinyl, tile, etc.).
Polyolefin in 15-mil thickness should be covered by a layer of clean sand (less than 5 percent by weight passing the No. 200 sieve) having a minimum thickness of 2 inches.
Based on our explorations and laboratory testing, the soils at the site are not consistently suitable for this purpose. The function of the sand layer is to protect the vapor retarder during construction and to aid in the uniform curing of the concrete. This layer should be nominally compacted using light equipment. The sand placed over the vapor retarder should only be slightly moist. If the sand gets wet (for example as a result of rainfall or excessive moistening) it must be allowed to dry prior to placing concrete. Care should be taken to avoid infiltration of water into the sand layer after placement of the concrete slab, such as at slab cut-outs and other exposures.
It should be noted that the material used as a vapor retarder is only one of several factors affecting the prevention of moisture accumulation under floor coverings. Other factors include maintaining a low water-cement ratio for the concrete used for the floor slab, effective sealing of joints and edges (particularly at pipe penetrations) as well as excess moisture in the concrete. The manufacturer of the floor coverings should be consulted for establishing acceptable criteria for the condition of the floor surface prior to placing moisture-sensitive floor coverings.
For lateral resistance design, a coefficient of friction value of 0.30 between select fill and concrete may be used. For a slab on a visqueen moisture barrier, a coefficient of 0.1 should be used.
4.8 CORROSION
Soil corrosivity testing was performed by HDR under subcontract to GPI. The corrosivity test results are presented in Appendix C. The on-site soils should be considered severely corrosive to buried metals. If corrosion consultation is required, a corrosion engineer such as HDR should be consulted.
4.9 EXTERIOR CONCRETE AND MASONRY FLATWORK
Exterior concrete and masonry flatwork should be supported on non-expansive, compacted fill. The use of the clayey soils, if encountered, within 2 feet of the slab subgrade should not be permitted unless differential heave is tolerable. This includes exterior sidewalks, stamped concrete, non-traffic pavement, pavers, etc. Prior to placement of concrete, the subgrade should be prepared as recommended in the "Subgrade Preparation" section of this report.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 23
4.10 SURFACE DRAINAGE
Positive surface gradients should be provided adjacent to structures to direct surface water run-off and roof drainage away from foundations and slabs toward suitable discharge facilities. Long-term ponding of surface water should not be allowed on pavements or adjacent to buildings.
4.11 STORM WATER INFILTRATION
Current regulations require that storm water be infiltrated into the site soils of new developments when possible. The soil types and groundwater levels present at the site control the ability of water to infiltrate into the subgrade. Additionally, Los Angeles County requires that water be infiltrated a minimum of 10 feet above seasonal groundwater levels.
Based on the current groundwater level (9 feet below existing grades) on-site subsurface infiltration of stormwater is not considered feasible.
4.12 PAVED AREAS
Preliminary pavement design has been based on an assumed R-value of 20 for the onsite granular soils. The California Division of Highways Design Method was used for design of the recommended preliminary pavement sections. These recommendations assume that the pavement subgrades will consist of the existing silty soils. The subgrade soil conditions will need to be confirmed at the conclusion of rough grading with R-value testing.
PAVEMENT AREA TRAFFIC INDEX
SECTION THICKNESS (inches)
ASPHALT/PORTLAND
CONCRETE
AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE
Asphalt Concrete
Automobile Parking
Automobile Drives
Truck Drives
4.0 5.0
6.0 3.0
3.0 3.0
5 7
10 Portland Cement Concrete
Automobile Parking
Automobile Drives
Truck Drives
4.0 5.0
6.0 6.5
6.5 7.0
----
----
----
The pavement subgrade underlying the aggregate base should be properly prepared and compacted in accordance with the recommendations outlined under "Subgrade Preparation".
If vehicular pavers are to be used for the project, the paver and leveling sand may be supported on the thickness of aggregate base shown above for flexible pavements and the appropriate traffic index.
The Portland cement concrete used for paving should have a modulus of rupture of at least 550 psi (equivalent to an approximate compressive strength of 3,700 psi) at the time the pavement is subjected to truck traffic.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 24
The pavement base course (as well as the top 12 inches of the subgrade soils) should be compacted to at least 90 percent (95 percent for sandy soils) of the maximum dry density (ASTM D-1557). Aggregate base should conform to the requirements of Section 26 of the California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Class II aggregate base (three-quarter inch maximum) or Section 200-2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) for untreated base materials, excluding processed miscellaneous base.
The above recommendations are based on the assumption that the base course and compacted subgrade will be properly drained. The design of paved areas should incorporate measures to prevent moisture build-up within the base course which can otherwise lead to premature pavement failure. For example, curbing adjacent to landscaped areas should be deep enough to act as a barrier to infiltration of irrigation water into the adjacent base course.
4.13 GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATION AND TESTING
We recommend that a representative of GPI observe earthwork, pile installation, and shoring installation during construction to confirm that the recommendations provided in our report are applicable during construction. The earthwork activities include grading, compaction of fills, subgrade preparation, pavement construction and foundation excavations. If conditions are different than expected, we should be afforded the opportunity to provide an alternate recommendation based on the actual conditions encountered.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) 25
5.0 LIMITATIONS
This report, exploration logs, and other materials resulting from GPI's efforts were prepared exclusively for use by the Marina Shores Owner, LP, its subsidiaries and their consultants in designing the proposed development. The report is not intended to be suitable for reuse on extensions or modifications of the project or for use on project other than the currently proposed development as it may not contain sufficient or appropriate information for such uses.
Soil deposits may vary in type, strength, and many other important properties between points of exploration due to non-uniformity of the geologic formations or to man-made cut and fill operations. While we cannot evaluate the consistency of the properties of materials in areas not explored, the conclusions drawn in this report are based on the assumption that the data obtained in the field and laboratory are reasonably representative of field conditions and are conducive to interpolation and extrapolation.
Furthermore, our recommendations were developed with the assumption that a proper level of field observation and construction review will be provided by GPI during grading, excavation, and foundation construction. If field conditions during construction appear to be different than is indicated in this report, we should be notified immediately so that we may assess the impact of such conditions on our recommendations. If construction phase services are performed by others, the client and new geotechnical firm must accept full responsibility for all geotechnical aspects of the project, including this report.
Our investigation and evaluations were performed using generally accepted engineering approaches and principles available at this time and the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable geotechnical engineers practicing in this area. No other representation, either expressed or implied, is included or intended in our report.
Respectfully submitted,
Geotechnical Professionals Inc.
James E. Harris V, P.E. Donald A. Cords, G.E.
Project Engineer Principal
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22)
REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers (2017), “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” ASCE/SEI 7-16.
California Division of Mines and Geology, 1998, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Los Alamitos 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Orange County, California, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 19.
California Division of Mines and Geology, 1999, “State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Los Alamitos Quadrangle, Official Map”, dated March 25, 1999.
California Geological Survey, 2008, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California,” Special Publication 117A.
GeoLogismiki, 2007, “CLIQ – CPT Liquefaction Software,” Version 3.0.3.2 Geotechnical Professionals Inc., “Report of Geotechnical Feasibility-Level Investigation, Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California,” Project No. 3084.I, dated November 19, 2021.
Robertson, P.K. 2009. Performance based earthquake design using the CPT, Proceedings of IS-Tokyo 2009: International Conference on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake GeotechnicalEngineering — From Case History to Practice, Tokyo, Japan, 15–18 June 2009. Edited by T. Kokusho, Y. Tsukamoto, and M. Yoshimine. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, the Netherlands. pp. 3–20.
Structural Engineers Association of California/Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, U.S Seismic Design Maps, 2020, https://seismicmaps.org/.
United States Geological Survey, 2008 National Seismic Hazard Maps, Source Parameters, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm.
Zhang, G., Robertson. P.K. Brachman, R.,2004, Estimating Liquefaction Induced Lateral Displacements using the SPT and CPT, ASCE, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, Vol. 130, No.8, 861-871.
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22)
TABLE 1
Recommended Design Parameters – Lateral
Depth
Below
Basement
Finished
Floor
(feet) Soil Type L-Pile Model
Estimated
Effective
Unit Weight
(pcf)
Internal
Angle of
Friction
(degrees)
Static
Soil
Modulus,
k
(pci)
Undrained
Shear
Strength,
cu
(psi)
Strain
Ė50
0 – 10
Soft
Clays
and Silts
Soft Clay
(Matlock) 110 --- --- 2.6 0.02
10 – 28
Soft
Clays
and Silts
Soft Clay
(Matlock) 53 --- --- 2.6 0.02
28 – 31
Medium
Dense
Silty
Sands
Sand
(Reese) 61 32 60 --- ---
31 – 35
Soft
Clays
and Silts
Soft Clay
(Matlock) 53 --- --- 5.2 0.01
35 – 50
Dense to
Very
Dense
Sands
Sand
(Reese) 61 34 125 --- ---
50 – 59
Soft
Clays
and Silts
Soft Clay
(Matlock) 49 --- --- 3.4 0.01
59 – 65
Dense to
Very
Dense
Sands
Sand
(Reese) 64 34 125 --- ---
SITE LOCATION
FIGURE 1
MARINA SHORES
GPI PROJECT NO. 3084.1I
GEOTECHNICAL
PROFESSIONALS, INC.
SITE
LOCATION
N
SCALE: 1” = 2000 FEET
0 2000ft 4000ft
BASE MAP REPRODUCED FROM © CALTOPO MAPS
SAN GABRIEL RIVER
SITE PLAN
(PROPOSED CONDITIONS)
GPI PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I FIGURE 2
GEOTECHNICAL
PROFESSIONALS, INC.
MARINA SHORES
SCALE: 1" = 80'
BASE PLAN REPRODUCED FROM THE GROUND LEVEL PLAN
BY ACMARTIN, DATED: 10/21/2021
N
0 80 160 FEET
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
STUDEBAKER ROAD
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
B-1
B-2
B-3
EXPLANATION
W-1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXPLORATORY BORING
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF CONE PENETRATION TEST
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF MONITORING WELL
B-1
C-2
W-1
SEE SECTION 1
ON FIGURE 4
SEE SECTION 3
ON FIGURE 4
SEE SECTION 2
ON FIGURE 5
SITE PLAN
(EXISTING CONDITIONS)
GPI PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I FIGURE 3
GEOTECHNICAL
PROFESSIONALS, INC.
SOCAL GAS SOLAR CANOPIES
SCALE: 1" = 80'
BASE PLAN REPRODUCED FROM THE SURVEY PLAN
BY ACMARTIN, DATED: 10/21/2021
N
0 80 160 FEET
APP
EXPLANATION
W-1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF EXPLORATORY BORING
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF CONE PENETRATION TEST
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF MONITORING WELL
B-1
B-1
B-2
B-3
C-2
C-1
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-5
W-1
PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION
G FIGURE 4 PI PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
GEOTECHNICAL
PROFESSIONALS, INC.
SCALE: 1” = 60’
0 60 120 FEET
BASE PLAN REPRODUCED FROM BUILDING SECTION PLAN PROVIDED BY AC MARTIN: DATED 07-21-2022
MARINA SHORES
PROPOSED BUILDING SECTION
G FIGURE 5 PI PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
GEOTECHNICAL
PROFESSIONALS, INC.
SCALE: 1” = 60’
0 60 120 FEET
BASE PLAN REPRODUCED FROM BUILDING SECTION PLAN PROVIDED BY AC MARTIN: DATED 07-21-2022
MARINA SHORES
APPENDIX A
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) A-1
APPENDIX A
CONE PENETRATION TESTS
The subsurface conditions were investigated by performing five Cone Penetration Tests (CPTs) at the site. The CPT’s were advanced to depths ranging from 35 to 100 feet below existing grades. The locations of the CPTs are shown on the Site Plans, Figures 2 and 3.
The Cone Penetration Test consists of pushing a cone-tipped probed into the soil deposit while simultaneously recording the cone tip resistance and side friction resistance of the soil to penetration (refer to Figure A-1). The CPTs described in this report were conducted in general accordance with ASTM specifications (ASTM D5778) using an electric cone penetrometer.
The CPT equipment consists of a cone assembly mounted at the end of a series of hollow sounding rods. A set of hydraulic rams is used to push the cone and rods into the soil while a continuous record of cone and friction resistance versus depth is obtained in both analog and digital form at the ground surface. A specially designed truck is used to transport and house the test equipment and to provide a 30-ton reaction to the thrust of the hydraulic rams. Due to limited accessibility to the southern parking lot, a limited access rig was used to perform C-3, C-4, and C-5. This equipment is much lighter than the conventional 30-ton rig. These constraints resulted in shallow refusals.
Standard data obtained during a CPT consists of continuous stratigraphic information with close vertical resolution. Stratigraphic interpretation is based on relationships between cone tip resistance and friction resistance. The calculated friction ratio (CPT friction sleeve resistance divided by cone tip resistance) is used as an indicator of soil type.
Granular soils typically have low friction ratios and high cone resistance, while cohesive or organic soils have high friction ratios and low cone resistance. These stratigraphic material categories form the basis for all subsequent calculations which utilize the CPT data.
Computer plots of the reduced CPT data acquired for this investigation is presented in Figures A-2 to A-6 of this appendix. The field testing and computer processing was performed by Kehoe Testing and Engineering under subcontract to Geotechnical Professionals Inc. (GPI). The interpreted soils descriptions were prepared by GPI.
A seismic cone penetration test provided shear wave velocity measurements of the soil profile. A standard cone penetrometer is equipped with two sets of geophones located approximately 3 feet apart on the cone penetrometer. At 10-foot intervals, a shear wave source is activated at the ground surface using an air-actuated hammer. A seismograph measures the travel time of the shear wave detected at each set of geophones. The time difference provides the velocity of the shear wave in the layer between the two geophone sets.
Marina Shores Owner LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) A-2
Seismic cone penetration tests were performed at CPT C-2. The cone penetration test at location C-2 was performed to 100 feet below existing grade and the subsequent data was used in order to estimate the weighted average shear wave velocity for the upper 100 feet of soil profile. The shear wave velocity measurements are provided in Table A1 of this appendix.
The CPT locations were laid out in the field by measuring from existing site features. Upon completion, the un-caved portions of the CPT holes were backfilled with bentonite chips.
Ground surface elevations at the exploration locations were estimated from Google Earth and should be considered very approximate.
TABLE A-1
CPT Shear Wave Measurements
Marina Shores, Long Beach, California
Location
Tip
Depth
(ft)
Geophone
Depth
(ft)
Travel
Distance
(ft)
S-Wave
Arrival
(msec)
S-Wave
Velocity
from
Surface
(ft/sec)
Interval
S-Wave
Velocity
(ft/sec)
C-2 10.04 9.04 9.26 15.74 588
20.05 19.05 19.15 40.24 476 404
30.02 29.02 29.09 60.36 482 494
40.03 39.03 39.08 73.84 529 741
50.03 49.03 49.07 87.70 560 721
60.14 59.14 59.17 101.48 583 733
70.05 69.05 69.08 112.74 613 880
80.02 79.02 79.05 122.28 646 1045
90.09 89.09 89.11 129.32 689 1430
100.03 99.03 99.05 135.76 730 1543
Shear Wave Source Offset -2 ft
S-Wave Velocity from Surface = Travel Distance/S-Wave Arrival Interval S-Wave Velocity = (Travel Dist2-Travel Dist1)/(Time2-Time1)
Interbedded SILTY SAND (SM)
and SANDY SILT (ML) medium
dense and soft
@ 6 feet, lens of clay
SILTY CLAY (CL) soft
@ 16 feet, lens of sandy silt
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
SILTY CLAY (CL) stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) dense
@ 37 to 42 feet, Interebededd
clayey silt
SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) very
dense
SILTY CLAY (CL) firm
SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) very
dense
@ 64 feet, lens of silty clay
@ 69 feet, lens of silty sand
CLAYEY SAND (SC) loose to
medium dense
@ 77 feet, lens of clayey silt
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-10-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
-70
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-1
FIGURE A-2
CLAYEY SILT (ML) very stiff to
hard
SAND (SP) very dense
@ 92 feet, lens of clayey sand
Terminated @ 100 feet
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-10-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
-75
-80
-85
-90
-95
-100
-105
-110
-115
-120
-125
-130
-135
-140
-145
-150
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-1
FIGURE A-2
SANDY SILT (ML) hard
Interbedded SILTY SAND (SM)
and CLAYEY SILT (ML) loose and
soft
@ 19 feet, lens of sandy silt
CLAY (CL) firm
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
CLAY (CL) very stiff to hard
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
to dense
@ 41 and 43 feet lens of clayey silt
SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) very
dense
SANDY SILT (ML) very stiff to hard
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-10-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
10 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
-70
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-2
FIGURE A-3
CLAYEY SILT (ML) hard
@ 80 feet, lens of clayey sand
SAND (SP) dense
CLAYEY SAND (SC) medium
dense to dense
SAND WITH SILT (SP-SM) very
dense
Terminated @ 100 feet
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
80 85
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-10-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
-70
-75
-80
-85
-90
-95
-100
-105
-110
-115
-120
-125
-130
-135
-140
-145
-150
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-2
FIGURE A-3
Interbedded SILTY SAND (SM)
AND CLAYEY SILT (ML) medium
dense to dense and stiff to very
stiff
SILTY CLAY (CL) soft
@ 10 feet, lens of silty sand
@ 19 feet, lens of silty sand
@ 20 feet, lens of sandy silt
SANDY SILT (ML) very stiff to hard
SILTY CLAY (CL) firm to stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) dense
Refusal @ 35 feet
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-4-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
10 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-3
FIGURE A-4
SANDY SILT (ML) hard
CLAYEY SILT (ML) firm to stiff
CLAY (CL) soft to firm
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
CLAYEY SILT (ML) soft to firm
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
SANDY SILT (ML) stiff
CLAYEY SILT (ML) firm to stiff
@ 33 lens of silty sand
SILTY SAND (SM) dense
Refusal @ 49 feet
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-4-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
15 10
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-4
FIGURE A-5
SANDY SILT (ML) stiff to very stiff
@ 6 feet lens of silty sand
Interbedded SILTY SAND (SM)
and CLAYEY SILT (ML) soft to firm
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
CLAY (CL) stiff to very stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) medium dense
to dense
@ 36 feet lens of clayey silt
Refusal @ 40 feet
P
(
I
300 4
I PR
(%)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 75
80 This summary applies only at the location of this cone penetration test and at the time of the exploration. Subsurface conditions may differ at F
Dateperformed:11-4-21
8 T
6 350 2
E
(
C N C TE
f
EV
250
T CONERESISTANCE
other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The interpreted soil description is derived from the friction ratio and cone resistance and is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. e
I
MARINA SHORES
f
H O
0 50
) EET)
10 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
-35
-40
-45
-50
-55
-60
-65
200
DE T
0 (
O E
tsf (
F L
150
R
RATIO
R
t
F . SOILDESCRIPTIONI
0 8
)
I T
PROJECT NO.: 3084.1I
R N D
100
)
4 2
E
et s
N
6 LOG OF CPT NO. C-5
FIGURE A-6
APPENDIX B
Marina Shores Owner LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) B-1
APPENDIX B
EXPLORATORY BORINGS
The subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling and sampling three exploratory borings. The borings were advanced to depths of 61 feet below the existing ground surface. The locations of the explorations are shown on the Site Plans, Figures 2 and 3.
The exploratory borings were drilled using truck-mounted hollow-stem auger drill equipment. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained using a brass-ring lined sampler (ASTM D3550). The brass-rings have an inside diameter of 2.42 inches. The ring samples were driven into the soil by a 140-pound hammer dropping 30 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the sampler into the soil was recorded as the penetration resistance.
The field explorations for the investigation were performed under the continuous technical supervision of GPI's representative, who visually inspected the site, maintained detailed logs of the borings, classified the soils encountered, and obtained relatively undisturbed samples for examination and laboratory testing. The soils encountered in the borings were classified in the field and through further examination in the laboratory in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System. Detailed logs of the borings are presented in Figures B-1 to B-3 in this appendix.
The boring locations were laid out in the field by measuring from existing site features.
Ground surface elevations at the exploration locations were estimated from Google Earth and should be considered very approximate.
12 4
3 3
4 3
2 20
30 86
79 71
82 88
86 78
83 97
34.2 35.3
51.1 33.9
33.2 35.0
41.1 39.2
26.8 26.9
4-Inch AC over 4-Inch BASE
Fill: SILTY SAND (SM) dark brown, wet, loose
Natural: CLAYEY SILT (ML) dark brown, wet, soft
@ 7 feet, soft to very soft
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, very loose
CLAYEY SILT (ML) brown, wet, very soft, trace sand
@ 25 feet, soft
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
SILTY CLAY (CL) brown, wet, very soft, trace sand
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
@ 35 feet, little recovery
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
9 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-1
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
-30
C
EQUIPMENT USED:
9 (FEET)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
S
B-1
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-1
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
13 30
5 4
5 97
92 69
84 68
28.0 30.1
20.1 62.3
33.8 57.6
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
CLAYEY SILT (ML) dark brown, wet, stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
SILTY CLAY (CL) brown, wet, soft
@ 60 feet, brown grey
Total Depth 61 feet
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
9 40
45 50
55 60
-35
-40
-45
-50
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-1
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
-35
-40
-45
-50
EQUIPMENT USED:
9 (FEET)
40 45
50 55
60 S
B-1
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-1
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
16 5
12 6
5 5
5 7
35 105
105
92 100
90 90
83 91
93 99
97 13.0
13.0 13.6
19.6 29.7
28.9 36.1
30.2 28.1
21.5 24.9
4?-Inch AC over 4-Inch BASE
Fill: SANDY SILT (ML) brown, moist, stiff
Natural: SANDY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft, with clay
@ 7 feet, firm to stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
CLAYEY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft
SANDY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft
CLAYEY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft
SILTY CLAY (CL) dark brown, very moist, firm
SILTY SAND (SM) dark brown, wet, medium dense
B
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
12 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 10
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-2
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
10 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
C
EQUIPMENT USED:
12 (FEET)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
S
B-2
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-2
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
9 24
20 25
37 99
91 93
104
24.0 30.9
30.9 19.0
SANDY SILT (ML) dark brown, wet, firm
@ 45 feet, very stiff
SILTY CLAY (CL) brown, wet, stiff
@ 55 feet, very moist, very stiff
@ 60 feet, no recovery
Total Depth 61 feet
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
12 40
45 50
55 60
-30
-35
-40
-45
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-2
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
-30
-35
-40
-45
EQUIPMENT USED:
12 (FEET)
40 45
50 55
60 S
B-2
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-2
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
17 9
3 4
7 7
3 20
22 101
86 78
82 87
90 81
92 102
13.0 21.5
33.3 35.9
33.6 29.1
37.9 30.3
23.1 4-Inch AC over 6-Inch BASE
Fill: SILTY SAND (SM) brown, moist, medium dense
Natural: SILTY CLAY (CL) brown, very moist, firm
CLAYEY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft to very soft
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, loose
CLAYEY SILT (ML) brown, wet, soft
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
CLAY (CL) brown, wet, soft
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
14 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 10
5 0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-3
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
10 5
0 -5
-10
-15
-20
-25
C
EQUIPMENT USED:
14 (FEET)
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
S
B-3
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-3
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
30 24
18 21
65/11"
98 98
90 105
25.3 25.5
28.7 30.6
22.1 SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
SILTY CLAY (CL) brown, wet, very stiff
SILTY SAND (SM) brown, wet, medium dense
@ 60 feet, dense
Total Depth 61 feet
D
D
D
D
D
B
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
Standard Split Spoon
Drive Sample SAMPLE TYPE
FIGURE DEPTH
S ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER LEVEL (ft):
PROJECT NO.:
14 40
45 50
55 60
-30
-35
-40
-45
D
DATE DRILLED: (FEET)
T
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample
LOG OF BORING NO. B-3
Rock Core
SAMPLE TYPES
T
C
-30
-35
-40
-45
EQUIPMENT USED:
14 (FEET)
40 45
50 55
60 S
B-3
6-8-22
(%)
Drive Sample DRY DENSITY (BLOWS/FOOT) ELEVATION
3084.1I MOISTURE
8 " Hollow Stem Auger PENETRATION RESISTANCE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS DEPTH
Rock Core
D
B
3084.1I
B-3
DATE DRILLED:
MARINA SHORES
SAMPLE TYPES
(PCF)
Standard Split Spoon MOISTURE
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS SAMPLE TYPE
Bulk Sample
Tube Sample (%)
(FEET)
This summary applies only at the location of this boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered.
FIGURE
APPENDIX C
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) C-1
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY TESTS
INTRODUCTION
Representative undisturbed soil samples and bulk samples were carefully packaged in the field and sealed to prevent moisture loss. The samples were then transported to our Cypress office for examination and testing assignments. Laboratory tests were performed on selected representative samples as an aid in classifying the soils and to evaluate the physical properties of the soils affecting foundation design and construction procedures.
Detailed descriptions of the laboratory tests are presented below under the appropriate test headings. Test results are presented in the figures that follow.
MOISTURE CONTENT AND DRY DENSITY
Moisture content and dry density were determined from a number of the ring samples.
The samples were first trimmed to obtain volume and wet weight and then were dried in accordance with ASTM D 2216. After drying, the weight of each sample was measured, and moisture content and dry density were calculated. Moisture content and dry density values are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B.
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Liquid and plastic limits were determined for selected samples in accordance with ASTM D4318. Results of the Atterberg Limits test are summarized on Figure C-1.
GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Selected soil samples were dried, weighed, soaked in water until individual soil particles were separated, and then washed on the No. 200 sieve. That portion of the material retained on the No. 200 sieve was oven-dried and weighed to determine the percentage of the material passing the No. 200 sieve.
BORING
NO.
DEPTH
(ft) SOIL DESCRIPTION PERCENT PASSINGNo. 200 SIEVE
B-1 0-5 Silty Sand (SM) 44
B-1 15 Silty Sand (SM) 28
B-2 10 Silty Sand (SM) 47
B-3 15 Silty Sand (SM) 17
B-3 20 Silty Sand (SM) 13
Marina Shores Owner, LP July 29, 2022
Proposed Mixed-Use Apartment Development, Long Beach, California GPI Project No. 3084.1I 3084-1I-01R (7/22) C-2
DIRECT SHEAR
Direct shear tests were performed on undisturbed samples in accordance with ASTM D 3080. The test specimens were placed in the shear machine, and a normal load comparable to the in-situ overburden stress was applied. The samples were inundated, allowed to consolidate, and then were sheared to failure at a strain rate of 0.001 inches per minute. The tests were repeated on additional test specimens under increased normal loads.
Shear stress and sample deformation were monitored throughout the tests. The results of the direct shear tests are presented in Figures C-2 to C-4.
CONSOLIDATION
One-dimensional consolidation testing was performed on undisturbed samples in accordance with ASTM D 2435. After trimming the ends, the samples were placed in the consolidometer and loaded to 0.4 ksf. Thereafter, the samples were incrementally loaded to a maximum load of 25.6 ksf. The samples were inundated at 1.6 ksf. Sample deformation was measured to 0.0001 inch. Rebound behavior was investigated by unloading the samples back to 0.4 ksf. Results of the consolidation tests, in the form of percent consolidation versus log pressure, are presented in Figures C-5 to C-8.
COMPACTION TEST
A maximum dry density/optimum moisture test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557 on a representative bulk sample of the site soils. The test are as follows:
BORING
NO.
DEPTH
(ft)
SOIL DESCRIPTION
MAXIMUM
DRY DENSITY
(pcf)
OPTIMUM
MOISTURE
(%)
B-2 0 – 5 Sandy Silt (ML) 117 13
EXPANSION INDEX
An expansion test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 4829 on a sample to assess the expansion potential of the recompacted soils. The results of the test are summarized below.
BORING
N0.
DEPTH
(ft) SOIL DESCRIPTION EXPANSION INDEX
B-2 0-5 Sandy Silt (ML) 2
CORROSIVITY
Soil corrosivity testing was performed by HDR on a soil sample provided by GPI. The test results are summarized in Table 1 at the end of this Appendix. 0 10
20 30
40 50
60 0 20 40 60 80 100
ML
45 SAMPLE LOCATION
PROJECT:
PI
PROJECT NO.
Fines, %
20.0 3084.1I
MH
29 16
OH
MARINA SHORES
ATTERBERG LIMITS TEST RESULTS
CL
FIGURE C-1
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI)
LL PL
CH
CLAYEY SILT (ML)
CL-ML
Classification
LIQUID LIMIT (LL)
or
B-1
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
PROJECT:
Cohesion= 437 psf
Classification
PEAK STRENGTH
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
FIGURE C-2
3084.1I
SHEAR STRENGTH, psf
NORMAL PRESSURE, psf
SANDY SILT (ML)
Note: Samples remolded to 90% of maximum dry density.
Friction Angle= 26 degrees
Sample Location DD,pcf
MARINA SHORES PROJECT NO.:
Cohesion= 316 psf
ULTIMATE STRENGTH
B-2 0-5 105 13.0
MC,%
Friction Angle= 26 degrees
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
FIGURE C-3
PROJECT: MARINA SHORES PROJECT NO.:
ULTIMATE STRENGTH
Cohesion= 312 psf
Friction Angle= 26 degrees
SANDY SILT (ML)
Sample Location
3084.1I
SHEAR STRENGTH, psf
NORMAL PRESSURE, psf
Cohesion= 273 psf
PEAK STRENGTH
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
5.0 MC,%
Friction Angle= 26 degrees
DD,pcf
19.6 Classification
B-2 100
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
FIGURE C-4
PROJECT: MARINA SHORES PROJECT NO.:
ULTIMATE STRENGTH
Cohesion= 516 psf
Friction Angle= 22 degrees
SILTY CLAY (CL)
Sample Location
3084.1I
SHEAR STRENGTH, psf
NORMAL PRESSURE, psf
Cohesion= 366 psf
PEAK STRENGTH
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
7.0 MC,%
Friction Angle= 24 degrees
DD,pcf
33.3 Classification
B-3 78
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRAIN, %
MARINA SHORES
CLAYEY SILT (ML) 78
DD,pcf MC,%
3084.1I
Classification
PROJECT: PROJECT NO.:
Sample Location
B-1
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
STRESS, psf
20.0 41.1
FIGURE C-5
Sample inundated at 1600 psf
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRAIN, %
MARINA SHORES
SANDY SILT (ML) 91
DD,pcf MC,%
3084.1I
Classification
PROJECT: PROJECT NO.:
Sample Location
B-2
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
STRESS, psf
20.0 30.2
FIGURE C-6
Sample inundated at 1600 psf
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRAIN, %
MARINA SHORES
CLAYEY SILT (ML) 93
DD,pcf MC,%
3084.1I
Classification
PROJECT: PROJECT NO.:
Sample Location
B-2
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
STRESS, psf
25.0 28.1
FIGURE C-7
Sample inundated at 1600 psf
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 100 1,000 10,000 105 STRAIN, %
MARINA SHORES
SILTY CLAY (CL) 99
DD,pcf MC,%
3084.1I
Classification
PROJECT: PROJECT NO.:
Sample Location
B-2
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
STRESS, psf
30.0 21.5
FIGURE C-8
Sample inundated at 2000 psf
Sample ID
B-2 @ 0-5'
Resistivity Units
as-received ohm-cm 720
saturated ohm-cm 720
pH 7.4
Electrical
Conductivity mS/cm 0.53
Chemical Analyses
Cations
calcium Ca2+ mg/kg 45
magnesium Mg2+ mg/kg ND
sodium Na1+ mg/kg 522
potassium K
1+ mg/kg 54
ammonium NH4
1+ mg/kg ND
Anions
carbonate CO3
2- mg/kg 68
bicarbonate HCO3
1-mg/kg 253
fluoride F
1- mg/kg 23
chloride Cl1- mg/kg 225
sulfate SO4
2- mg/kg 540
nitrate NO3
1- mg/kg 4.6
phosphate PO4
3- mg/kg ND
Other Tests
sulfide S
2- qual na
Redox mV na
Resistivity per ASTM G187, pH per ASTM G51, Cations per ASTM D6919, Anions per ASTM D4327, and Alkalinity per APHA 2320-B.
Electrical conductivity in millisiemens/cm and chemical analyses were made on a 1:5 soil-to-water extract. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil.
Redox = oxidation-reduction potential in millivolts
ND = not detected
na = not analyzed
Table 1 - Laboratory Tests on Soil Samples
Marina Shores
Your #3084.1I, HDR Lab #22-0618LAB
29-Jun-22
Geotechnical Professionals, Inc.
431 West Baseline Road ∙ Claremont, CA 91711
Phone: 909.962.5485 ∙ Fax: 909.626.3316 Page 2 of 2
APPENDIX D
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
April 2023
Appendix E Phase I and II Environmental Site
Assessments
6700 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY MIXED-USE PROJECT
CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
428 13th Street, 4th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Tel 510.839.0688
92 Argonaut, Suite 100
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Tel 949.716.0050
www.ngem.com
47 East All Saints Street
Frederick, Maryland 21701
Tel 301.528.1500
PHASE I AND II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE
ASSESSMENTS
Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Prepared For:
Wactor & Wick LLP
3640 Grand Avenue, Suite 200
Oakland, California 94610
Prepared By:
Northgate Environmental Management, Inc.
92 Argonaut, Suite 100
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
December 8, 2021
Project No. 2047.32
2047.32.01S
PHASE I AND II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS
Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
December 8, 2021
Prepared For:
Wactor & Wick LLP
3640 Grand Avenue, Suite 200
Oakland, California 94610
Prepared By:
Northgate Environmental Management, Inc.
92 Argonaut, Suite 100
Aliso Viejo, California 92656
Derrick S. Willis Nicky G. Robinson, PE, QSD/P
Principal Senior Engineer
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments i December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Phase I ESA ............................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Phase II ESA ........................................................................................................... 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 4
2.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Scope of Services .................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Limitations and Exceptions..................................................................................... 5
2.3.1 Limitations ............................................................................................... 5
2.3.2 Exceptions ................................................................................................ 6
2.4 User Reliance .......................................................................................................... 6
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ....................................................................................................... 7
3.1 Site Location and Legal Description ....................................................................... 7
3.2 Site Vicinity General Characteristics ...................................................................... 7
3.3 Geology and Groundwater ...................................................................................... 7
3.3.1 Geology .................................................................................................... 7
3.3.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 7
3.4 Current Use of the Property .................................................................................... 8
3.5 Description of Structures, Roads, Sewage, and Potable Water Sources ................. 8
3.6 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ..................................................................... 8
4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ............................................................................. 9
4.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations ........................................... 9
4.2 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ...................................................... 9
4.3 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information .......................................... 9
4.4 Specialized Knowledge ........................................................................................... 9
4.5 Reason for Performing the Phase I ESA ................................................................. 9
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW ..................................................................................................... 10
5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ............................................................. 10
5.1.1 Site.......................................................................................................... 10
5.1.2 Off-Site Sources ..................................................................................... 11
5.2 Vapor Encroachment Screening ........................................................................... 16
5.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources .......................................................... 16
5.3.1 Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Website .............. 17
5.3.2 State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker Website ................. 17
5.3.3 California Environmental Protection Agency Website .......................... 18
5.3.4 Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region ............. 18
5.3.5 City of Long Beach Fire Department ..................................................... 19
5.3.6 Los Angeles County Fire Department .................................................... 19
5.3.7 Long Beach Certified Unified Program Agency .................................... 19 Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments ii December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.3.8 City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health ............................................................................ 20
5.3.9 Los Angeles County, Public Health Department ................................... 20
5.3.10 Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works ................................ 20
5.3.11 South Coast Air Quality Management District ...................................... 20
5.3.12 National Pipeline Mapping System ........................................................ 20
5.3.13 Oil and Gas Wells .................................................................................. 21
5.4 Other Environmental Issues .................................................................................. 21
5.4.1 Floodplain Maps .................................................................................... 21
5.4.2 Radon ..................................................................................................... 21
5.4.3 Methane.................................................................................................. 22
5.5 Land Use History .................................................................................................. 22
5.5.1 Aerial Photographs ................................................................................ 22
5.5.2 Sanborn Maps ........................................................................................ 26
5.5.3 Topographic Maps ................................................................................. 26
5.5.4 City Directories ...................................................................................... 28
5.6 Interviews .............................................................................................................. 29
5.6.1 Owner Interview ..................................................................................... 29
5.6.2 Key Site Manager Interview ................................................................... 29
5.6.3 Site User Interview ................................................................................. 30
5.7 Previous Reports ................................................................................................... 30
6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................... 31
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ................................................................. 31
6.2 General Site and Vicinity Conditions ................................................................... 31
6.2.1 Subject Site ............................................................................................. 31
6.2.2 Site Vicinity ............................................................................................ 31
7.0 PHASE I ESA CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................... 33
8.0 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT .............................................. 34
8.1 Scope of Work ...................................................................................................... 34
8.2 Authorization ........................................................................................................ 35
9.0 PHASE II ESA INVESTIGATION METHODS ......................................................... 36
9.1 Pre-Field Activities ............................................................................................... 36
9.1.1 Health and Safety Plan ........................................................................... 36
9.1.2 Clearance of Underground Utilities ....................................................... 36
9.1.3 Drilling Permits ...................................................................................... 36
9.2 Soil Sampling and Analysis .................................................................................. 36
9.3 Groundwater Sampling ......................................................................................... 38
9.4 Soil Vapor Survey ................................................................................................. 38
9.5 Data Evaluation Criteria ....................................................................................... 39 Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments iii December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
10.0 PHASE II INVESTIGATION RESULTS .................................................................... 41
10.1 Subsurface Conditions .......................................................................................... 41
10.2 Analytical Results ................................................................................................. 41
10.2.1 Soil Sample Analytical Results............................................................... 41
10.2.2 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results ............................................ 42
10.2.3 Soil Vapor Analytical Results ................................................................ 42
11.0 PHASE II ESA CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................. 43
12.0 LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... 44
13.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 45
14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT ............................................ 47 TABLES
1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Asbestos and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 2 Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Volatile Organic Compounds 3 Summary of Soil and Concrete Analytical Results – Title 22 Metals 4 Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Organochlorine Pesticides and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
5 Summary of Soil Analytical Results – Polychlorinated Biphenyls 6 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 7 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results – Volatile Organic Compounds 8 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results – Title 22 Metals 9 Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results – Oxygen, Methane, Volatile Organic Compound, and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline
FIGURES
1 Site Vicinity Map
2 Site Plan
3 Boring Location Map
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments iv December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
APPENDICES
A Title Report and EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search B The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
C Previous Reports, Agency, and Other Records – Site
D The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
E Certified Sanborn® Map Report
F The EDR Historical Topographic Map Report
G The EDR-City Directory Abstract
H Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Questionnaire
I Drilling Permits
J Boring Logs
K Field Procedures
L Laboratory Analytical Reports
M Environmental Professional Qualifications
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 1 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1.0 SUMMARY
This Report presents the results of Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) performed by Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. (Northgate) for Wactor & Wick, LLP (Wactor & Wick) on behalf of their client, Marina Shores Owners, LP (collectively “User”), at the Marina II property located at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, in Long Beach, California (the Site). In summary, the Phase I ESA found no Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) and the Phase II Investigation consisting of soil, soil vapor and groundwater testing, found no soil contamination and no groundwater contamination above regulatory screening levels, but did detect oil-field related methane gas and low concentrations of various volatile organic compounds in soil gas above regulatory screening levels, as described in detail in this Report.
1.1 Phase I ESA
The Site consists of approximately 2.58 acres of land located south of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and North Studebaker Road. The Site is currently entirely developed with a twostory commercial office building, one-level of partially subterranean parking, and asphalt paved surface parking lots with associated landscape. The Site is identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number (APNs) 7242-012-006 and -007 in Los Angeles County. A Site Vicinity Map is shown on Figure 1 and a Site Plan is shown on Figure 2. Our review of the Site history indicates it originally was undeveloped land within the riverbed of the adjacent San Gabriel River. By 1938, the San Gabriel River was channelized and the Site appeared to have been filled and graded. The Site remained unchanged until the 1960s when large areas of darker soil were present, particularly in the northwestern portions of the Site, that may be related to the Los Angeles Flood Control District’s (LACFCD) disposal activities from the channel cleanup of the banks of the San Gabriel River. By 1983, redevelopment of the Site had been initiated and was reportedly completed in 1984 to include a commercial office building in the northern and central portions of the Site surrounded by asphalt paved parking areas. The Site land use has remained unchanged through the present. Active and abandoned oil pipelines are identified to be located along the northeastern portion of the Site along Pacific Coast Highway.
Phase I Results Summary:
In summary, Northgate has performed a Phase I ESA of the Marina II property located at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway in Long Beach, California in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 and the standards and practices of the All Appropriate Inquiry – Final Rule (40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 312). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, these practices are described in Section 2.3 of this report. Our review did not identify the Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 2 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs), Historic Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs), or Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) in connection with the property
1.2 Phase II ESA
Based on the Phase I, the Site is located within the boundary of the Seal Beach Oil Field which indicates the potential for migration of vapors onto the Site such as methane and other volatile natural gases, and historic oil field operations have been conducted in the immediate Site vicinity. While there is no record of oil field operations on the Site, nearby properties were operated as part of the oil field, including Chevron’s Seal Beach Gas Plant (“Gas Plant”), which processed natural gas from the nearby oil fields until 1985, which was located adjacent to the northwest of the Site across North Studebaker Road. The Gas Plant was investigated and remediated in the 1980’s to mid-1990’s under regulatory oversight and received regulatory closure from the Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region (RWQCB) on September 22, 1994. However, the closure letter for the Gas Plant indicated that groundwater beneath it was impacted with benzene attributed to unidentified upgradient off-site source(s).
In addition, active and abandoned oil pipelines were identified along the northeastern portion of the Site along Pacific Coast Highway and the Site contains an oil pipeline easement with at least one pipeline in the easement. There are no records or releases from these oil pipelines; however, their presence may represent a concern for the Site.
In addition, although the records are unclear, the Site may have been utilized by the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) in the 1960s for the disposal of up to approximately 25,000 cubic yards of vegetation from channel cleanup activities along the banks of the San Gabriel River. The LACFCD received an industrial waste permit from Los Angeles County Sanitation District for this operation; however, the actual location of this disposal has not been identified.
Northgate conducted a Phase II ESA to investigate the oil field, pipeline and disposal issues summarized above. Nine borings (B-1 through B-8 and HA-1) were advanced across the Site with soil samples collected at depths of 1, 5, 8, 10 and/or 12 feet below ground surface (bgs) and selectively analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Title 22 metals, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and asbestos. Soil vapor probes were installed in eight of the borings (B-1 through B-8) at a general depth of 5 feet bgs with samples analyzed for methane, oxygen, VOCs, and TPH as gasoline (TPH-g). Eight of the borings (B-1 through B-8) Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 3 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
were advanced to groundwater with grab groundwater samples collected and analyzed for TPH, VOCs, and metals.
Phase II Results Summary:
Soil: Based on the soil analytical results, none of the soil samples collected at the Site exceeded regulatory screening levels with the exception of arsenic at 1-foot bgs in boring B-5. While TPH did not exceed regulatory screening levels, there were isolated detections of TPH that would preclude soil export for sites with unrestricted use.
Groundwater: The groundwater analytical results did not exceed regulatory screening levels.
Soil Vapor: Soil vapor analytical results indicated that TPH-g and several VOCs exceeded screening levels, such as benzene and chloroform (across the Site), and isolated detections of bromodichloromethane, ethylbenzene, tetrachloroethene (PCE), and trichloroethene (TCE).
Methane was detected in two locations (B-3 and B-4) above City action levels.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 4 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
2.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Phase I and II ESAs performed by Northgate at the Marina II property located at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway in Long Beach, California. The results of the Phase I ESA are presented in Sections 2.0 through 7.0 and the results of the Phase II ESA are presented in Sections 8.0 through 11.0.
The Site consists of approximately 2.58 acres of land developed with a two-story commercial office building, one-level of partially subterranean parking, and asphalt paved surface parking lots with associated landscape. The Site consists of one parcel identified as APNs 7242-012-006 and -007 in Los Angeles County. A Site Vicinity Map is shown on Figure 1 and a Site Plan is shown on Figure 2.
2.1 Purpose
The purpose of Phase I ESA was to identify and evaluate the presence of RECs at the Site. The term “RECs” means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment, and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.
2.2 Scope of Services
Northgate has performed the Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E-1527-13, Standard Practices for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process and 40 CFR Part 312, Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiry – Final Rule. This investigation was performed by Nicky Robinson, Senior Engineer with assistance and review by Derrick Willis, Northgate Principal. The scope of work for the investigation included the following services:
Review of readily available information regarding the history of the Site, including historic aerial photographs, maps, previous reports, and other information, and discussions with individuals familiar with the Site; Review of a title report for the Site provided by the Wactor & Wick; A reconnaissance of the Site and nearby vicinity;
An interview with onsite leasing and maintenance staff; Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 5 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Discussions with regulatory officials and review of regulatory agency publications and files, as applicable;
Evaluation of potential RECs, development of conclusions and a scope of work to evaluate potential on-Site contamination concerns; and
Preparation of this report.
2.3 Limitations and Exceptions
2.3.1 Limitations
The purpose of an environmental assessment is to reasonably evaluate the potential for RECs arising from past practices on a given site area. In performing an environmental assessment, it is understood that a balance must be struck between a reasonable inquiry into the environmental issues and an exhaustive analysis of each conceivable issue of potential concern. No investigation is thorough enough to absolutely rule out the presence of hazardous materials at a given site. If hazardous conditions have not been identified during the assessment, such a finding should not be construed as a guarantee of the absence of such materials on the Site, but rather as the result of the services performed within the scope, limitations, and cost of the work performed.
Environmental conditions may exist at the Site that cannot be identified by visual observation.
Where subsurface work was performed, our professional opinions are based in part on interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent actual conditions at un-sampled locations.
Except where there is express concern of our client, or where specific environmental contaminants have been previously reported by others, naturally occurring toxic substances, potential environmental contaminants inside buildings, or contaminant concentrations that are not of current environmental concern may not be reflected in this document.
Where the scope of services is limited to interview and/or review of readily available reports and literature, any conclusions and/or recommendations are necessarily based largely on information supplied by others, the accuracy or sufficiency of which may not be independently reviewed by Northgate.
Any opinions and/or recommendations presented apply to Site conditions existing at the time of performance of services. We are unable to report on, or accurately predict, generally unforeseeable events that may impact the Site following performance of services, whether occurring naturally or caused by external forces. Therefore, we cannot assume responsibility for Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 6 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
such events or their impact. We also cannot assume responsibility for changes in environmental standards, practices, or regulations.
2.3.2 Exceptions
The time intervals between some historical information sources may exceed five years due to the unavailability of such records. However, in our opinion, this data gap does not significantly impact our ability to evaluate historic land use conditions at the Site given the availability of other sources for this information.
At the time this report was prepared, no response to Northgate’s request to review files had been received from regulatory records requests from the Los Angeles County Fire Department. This constitutes a data gap as defined in the ASTM Standard which could potentially impact our ability to evaluate environmental conditions at the Site. Northgate will issue an addendum to this report upon receipt of the regulatory files if such information changes the conclusions or recommendations provided in this report.
There were no other limiting conditions.
2.4 User Reliance
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Wactor & Wick LLP and its client Marina Shores Owner, LP (collectively, “the User”) and their corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates, partners, partnerships, and lenders in evaluating environmental conditions at the Site. Others may not use or rely on the information contained in this report without the express written consent of Northgate.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 7 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
3.1 Site Location and Legal Description
The Site consists of one parcel totaling approximately 2.58 acres of land located at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway in Long Beach, California. The Site is identified as APNs 7242-012-006 and - 007 in Los Angeles County, California. A Site Vicinity Map is shown on Figure 1 and a Site Plan is shown on Figure 2.
3.2 Site Vicinity General Characteristics
The Site improvements consists of a two-story commercial office building, one-level of partially subterranean parking, and asphalt paved surface parking lots with associated landscape. The Site is located in a developed commercial district and is bounded to the northeast by Pacific Coast Highway, to the southeast by the San Gabriel River riparian corridor, to the southwest by East Marina Drive, and to the northwest by North Studebaker Road. The approximate elevation of the Site is 15 feet above mean sea level with a slight slope to the southwest. The Site is located in an area of primarily mixed residential and commercial development with nearby wetland areas and marinas within the City of Long Beach.
3.3 Geology and Groundwater
3.3.1 Geology
The Site is located in the southern portion of the Los Angeles Basin of Los Angeles County, by the Alamitos Gap. Shallow sediments in the Site vicinity include interbedded shallow marine terrace and alluvial sediments composed of sands, silty sands, silts, and clays of Recent Age (Levine-Fricke, 1994). The shallow marine terrace deposits have been uplifted by ongoing seismic movement along the Newport-Inglewood Fault and eroded to form mesas in the area.
The Alamitos Gap represents a stream cut channel that was eroded and backfilled by ancestral rivers (CDWR, 1961). The alluvial deposits are many hundreds of feet thick in this area (AEC, 2016).
3.3.2 Groundwater
The Site is located within the southern portion of the West Coast Groundwater Basin. The SemiPerched Aquifer within the Recent alluvium represents the uppermost aquifer in the Alamitos Gap. The depth to groundwater based on nearby sites ranges from 5 to 20 feet bgs and is tidally influenced (Levine-Fricke, 1994 and AEC, 2016). Groundwater flow direction in the Site vicinity ranges from southeast to southwest (Levine-Fricke, 1994 and AEC, 2016).
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 8 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
3.4 Current Use of the Property
The Site is currently developed with an occupied two-story commercial office building, onelevel of partially subterranean parking, and asphalt paved surface parking lots with associated landscape.
3.5 Description of Structures, Roads, Sewage, and Potable Water Sources The Site consists of one commercial office building and asphalt paved surface parking lots with associated landscape. The office building is two-stories high and includes one level of partially subterranean parking. Access to the Site is available via North Studebaker Road to the northwest. Water and sewer connections are provided through the City of Long Beach.
3.6 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties
The Site is bordered to the northeast by Pacific Coast Highway followed by an undeveloped dirt lot that is currently occupied by a seasonal pumpkin patch. Wetland areas and the San Gabriel River are located farther northeast of the Site. To the east, the Site is bordered by a recreational dirt path and the San Gabriel River followed by wetland areas and commercial development.
East Marina Drive followed by a commercial retail development, then a marina is located southwest of the Site. Residential development followed by the Pacific Ocean is located farther southwest of the Site. The Site is bordered to the northwest by North Studebaker Road followed by commercial development. The Site is located within the Seal Beach Oil Field.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 9 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
4.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations Northgate reviewed a title report provided for the Site by the User. No environmental liens or activity use limitations were documented in the title report. A copy of the title report is included in Appendix A. The Site is noted to be located within the boundaries of the Southeast Area Specific Plan for the City of Long Beach (PlaceWorks, 2017).
An environmental lien and activity and use limitation (AUL) search was conducted by EDR.
EDR’s review indicates that there are no environmental liens or activity and use limitations of record on the Site. A copy of the Environmental Lien and AUL Search is included in Appendix A (EDR, 2021a).
4.2 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
The User has not provided Northgate with any information indicating that the value of the property has been reduced due to environmental issues.
4.3 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information
The environmental lien and AUL search conducted by EDR for the Site shown in Appendix A indicates that title to the Site is vested in ValueRock Congressional LLC, ValueRock Congressional II LLC, and ValueRock Congressional III LLC. The Site is managed by ValueRock. It is occupied by a variety of commercial tenants primarily including financial companies.
4.4 Specialized Knowledge
The User provided copies of previous reports prepared for the Site to Northgate as part of this assessment. The User has not indicated that it possesses any additional specialized knowledge regarding the Site.
4.5 Reason for Performing the Phase I ESA
Northgate understands that the User is evaluating the property for potential purchase and redevelopment which may include a mix of retail and residential uses.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 10 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW
5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources
To determine if the Site has any documented environmental concerns, or if other sites with documented environmental concerns exist within the search radii of the Site prescribed by ASTM 1527-13 and All Appropriate Inquiry standards, Northgate reviewed a summary of regulatory agency database listings prepared by EDR. In addition, where appropriate, we reviewed local regulatory agency files for additional specific information regarding sites identified in the EDR report judged to be of possible concern to the subject Site. The EDR report presenting a summary of the agency databases reviewed and a map showing the location of the identified sites is provided in Appendix B (EDR, 2021b). The results of the database search and follow-up agency file review are summarized below.
5.1.1 Site
According to EDR, the Site is listed at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway on the ERNS and CHMIRS databases for reports of gasoline and motor oil releases from passenger vehicles that had driven off the road and into the water of the San Gabriel River. It appears that the Site address was likely the closest physical address for the reported incidents and none of the incidents appear to have occurred on the subject Site. The first incident was a reported vehicle that had driven into the water on November 13, 2012, resulting in a release of motor oil. The vehicle was reported to have been removed with oversight from the local fire and police departments. A second vehicle was reported to have driven into the San Gabriel River on July 27, 2016, resulting in a release of approximately 20 gallons of gasoline.
The Site was also listed as Diversified Equity Investments, LLC, DBA ValueRock at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway on the HWTS database. This listing indicates that occupant was a lessor of nonresidential buildings. No specific waste removal was documented, and the facility was only identified on the HWTS database in 2017 when the Site was occupied by a commercial office building, which indicates this facility may have used as the mailing address for the company responsible for waste removal from another facility. No further information was available.
The Site was also identified at two historic addresses for the property. It was listed as the Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership at 6655 Marina on the CPS-SLIC and CERS databases.
These database listings refer to the remediation and closure of the Site related to the historic gas plant. The Site was also identified for the LACFD at 6502 Pacific Coast Highway as a historic Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 11 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
closed landfill. Based on Northgate’s investigation, both of these listings are actually unrelated to the Site. These listings are discussed further in Section 5.7.
5.1.2 Off-Site Sources
The regulatory agency database search prepared by EDR indicates the presence of 125 agency-listed sites located within an approximate one-mile radius of the Site. The EDR database report containing a list of the agency databases searched is attached in Appendix B. Sites with documented releases impacting groundwater located within 0.25-mile upgradient and/or cross-gradient of the Site, or otherwise judged to be of potential impact to soil, soil vapor, or groundwater quality at the Site, are summarized in the following table. Relevant reports and/or documents obtained as part of the Site vicinity review are presented in Appendix C.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 12 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CaliforniaTable 2 – Off-Site Regulatory Database Listings Property Name Agency Database
Approximate
Location Relative to
Site
Potential Environmental Concern
Chevron Alamitos Bay Partnership – 6655 Marina Drive, Long Beach LUST, HIST UST, CHMIRS, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CPS-SLIC, RCRASQG, and CERS Adjacent (across Studebaker Road) to the northwest (upgradient) of the Site This facility was developed as part of Chevron’s Seal Beach Gas Plant that processed natural gas from the nearby oil fields. The gas plant operations were predominantly located in the southeastern portion of the Alamitos Bay Partnership property and included ASTs, vessels, and piping for pumping and processing natural gas. Additionally, a large industrial facility was located in this area. The former Chevron Seal Beach Gas Plant was reportedly removed from the area in the mid-1970s but a small gas booster compression plant remained in operation until 1985. Prior to redevelopment of the property, remedial activities were conducted related to thehistoric gas plant operations that included soil excavation, exsitu bioremediation of soil, and spoil import for backfill.
Groundwater monitoring was also conducted but no groundwater remediation was reported. Benzene was detected in groundwater in 1994 at concentrations up to 770 micrograms per liter; however, the Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership received regulatory closure from the RWQCB on September 22, 1994 for this facility. Even though closure was granted at the former Gas Plant property almost thirty years ago, the residual benzene reported in groundwater (unknown source) there in 1994 might still be present there, although Northgate’s groundwater sampling of the subject Site did not detect benzene. Benzene is biodegradable.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 13 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CaliforniaTable 2 – Off-Site Regulatory Database Listings Property Name Agency Database
Approximate
Location Relative to
Site
Potential Environmental Concern
City Dump and Salvage No. 2 – 6501 to 6695 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach SWF/LF, CERS, and WMUDS/SWAT
Adjacent across Pacific Coast Highway to the northeast (crossgradient) of the Site This facility is listed as a city dump and salvage facility that began in 1960 and was reported to have accepted solid waste. The landfill is regulated under Order R4-2002-022 by the RWQCB. The area is currently developed with retail and commercial development. Given the cross-gradient location, the lack of documented impacts extending off the dump property, and the regulatory oversight, this facility does not appear to represent a potential to impact soil, soil vapor, or groundwater quality at the subject Site. Our testing did not find any impact from this dump property to the Site.
Miller Stan Sail Boats – 245 Marina Drive, Long Beach
EDR Hist Auto Approximately 200-
feet southwest (crossto downgradient) of the Site
This facility was identified on the EDR proprietary (nonregulatory) database as a gasoline service station listed as Miller Stan Sail Boats in 1985. No records of contamination or releases at this property impacting the environment or the subject Site were identified as part of the regulatory review. Given the downgradient location and lack of a documented release, this facility does not appear to represent a potential threat to soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater quality at the subject Site. Our Site testing did not find any impact to the Site from this historic facility.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 14 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CaliforniaTable 2 – Off-Site Regulatory Database Listings Property Name Agency Database Approximate Location Relative to Site Potential Environmental Concern Paradise Cleaners/ Martinizing – 6608 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach DRYCLEANERS, HAZNET, HWTS, RCRA NonGen/NLR, and EDR Hist Cleaner Approximately 0.10 miles northwest (crossgradient) of the Site The facility is listed as a dry cleaning and laundry facility between 2006 and 2018. It was identified to operate equipment that utilized petroleum solvents in 2014. It was identified for the generation of halogenated solvents, petroleum/hydrocarbon solvents, and liquids with halogenated organic compounds between 2007 and 2008. It was additionally identified on the EDR proprietary (non-regulatory) database as a dry cleaning plant listed as Paradise Cleaners between at least 2011 and 2014. No records of contamination or releases at this property impacting the environment or the subject Site were identified as part of the regulatory review. Based on the available information, this facility appears to have operated at this location from at least 2006 through 2018. Given the lack of a documented release and crossgradient location, this facility does not appear to represent a potential threat to soil, soil vapor, and/or groundwater quality at the subject Site. Our Site testing did not find any impact to the Site from this historic facility.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 15 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CaliforniaTable 2 – Off-Site Regulatory Database Listings Property Name Agency Database Approximate Location Relative to Site Potential Environmental Concern J’s Cleaner and Laundry – 6481 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach CPS-SLIC, DRYCLEANERS, and CERS
Approximately 0.23 miles northwest (cross-gradient) of the Site The facility is listed as a former dry-cleaning facility that ceased operations in 2001. The operations included the use of PCE as a dry-cleaning solvent. The equipment was removed and soil and groundwater investigations were conducted. Groundwater sample results in 2000 indicated that the plume of PCE impacted groundwater had not migrated further than 70 to 80 feet from the source and was directed to the west towards the Long Beach Marina (away from the subject Site). Soil excavation was conducted in 2001 with the majority of the PCE-impacted material removed with some material left in place as the excavation would undermine bearing walls and support footings for the structure. Since the equipment and the majority of the PCE impacted soil had been removed and since PCE had not been detected in groundwater located downgradient of the facility, the RWQCB required no further action and provided closure for the facility on July 8, 2003. Given the cross-gradient location, no documented impacts beneath or in the vicinity of the former dry-cleaner Site, and the regulatory closure status, this facility does not appear torepresent a potential threat to soil, soil vapor, or groundwater quality at the subject Site. Our Site testing did not find any impact to the Site from this historic facility.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 16 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.2 Vapor Encroachment Screening
Northgate performed a vapor encroachment screening (VES) evaluation as part of the Phase I ESA using EDR’s vapor encroachment condition (VEC) application (VEC App), which assists in screening for vapor encroachment risk in accordance with ASTM E2600 “Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions.” A VEC is the presence or likely presence of constituent of concern vapors in the vadose zone of the target property (TP) caused by the release of vapors from contaminated soil and/or groundwater either on or near the TP. A “Tier I” VES was performed to evaluate the potential for vapors associated with contaminated soil and/or groundwater to impact the Site, whether originating from the Site or from nearby off-Site sources. For properties where a VEC could not be ruled out, existing subsurface investigation reports, if available, were used to evaluate potential impacts to the Site (Tier 2 screening). The following table presents a summary of the VES findings:
Northgate’s review indicates that the Site is located within the Seal Beach Oil Field and active and abandoned oil pipelines are presented at the subject Site. Additionally, historic oil field operations were conducted in the immediate vicinity of the subject Site including the Chevron Seal Beach Gas Plant. No documented hazardous chemical use or release has been identified at the Site. Our Phase II Site testing did find VOCs in soil vapor on the subject Site which constitute a VEC.
5.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources
Northgate contacted local regulatory agencies for information regarding the use or storage of hazardous materials at the Site, and reviewed files at any agency maintaining a file for the subject Site. The following agencies were contacted for information regarding the use or storage of hazardous materials at the Site:
Potential for Vapor Intrusion on Site
Areas of Concern Conclusion
Site (existing land use) No VEC identified.
Site (former land use) No VEC identified (no historic site operations with VOC use).
Adjoining Property or near-by Property
Operations or Existing Conditions
VEC not identified because current adjacent land
use doesn’t include VOCs.
Historical Uses of Adjoining Property or
Near-by Properties
VEC identified because former adjacent land use
within 100 feet of subject Site included VOC use
and groundwater detections.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 17 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Website; State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker Website; California Environmental Protection Agency Website;
Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region; City of Long Beach Fire Department;
Los Angeles County Fire Authority;
Long Beach Certified Unified Program Agency;
City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/ Bureau of Environmental Health;
Los Angeles County, Department of Public Health;
Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works;
South Coast Air Quality Management District;
National Pipeline Mapping System; and
Oil and Gas Wells.
The results of our review are described in the following sections.
5.3.1 Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor Website The Site is not listed on the Department of Toxic Substances Control Board (DTSC) EnviroStor website, and thus, there are no files related to the property.
5.3.2 State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker Website Two closed site cleanups were georeferenced to be located at the subject Site on the State Water Resources Control Board’s GeoTracker website. However, Northgate has determined that neither of the georeferenced cleanups were actually located on the subject Site. The first listing is for the Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership identified at 6655 Marina Drive. This facility was developed as part of Chevron’s Seal Beach Gas Plant that processed natural gas from the nearby oil fields. The gas plant operations were predominantly located in the southeastern portion of the Alamitos Bay Partnership property and included ASTs, vessels, and piping for pumping and processing natural gas. Additionally, a large industrial facility was located in this area. The former Chevron Seal Beach Gas Plant was reportedly removed from the area in the mid-1970s, but a small gas booster compression plant remained in operation until 1985. Prior to redevelopment of the property, remedial activities were conducted related to the historic gas plant operations that included soil excavation, ex-situ bioremediation of soil, and spoil import for backfill. Groundwater monitoring was also conducted but no groundwater remediation was reported. The Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership received regulatory closure from the RWQCB on September 22, 1994 for this facility. Upon further review of the reports and documents Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 18 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
previously prepared for the Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership, this facility was not located on the subject Site, but was located adjacent to the northwest of the Site across Studebaker Road.
The second cleanup listing identified a Flood Control District disposal facility located at 6502 Pacific Coast Highway. The Los Angeles County Flood Control District was granted an Industrial Waste Permit in March 1961 for the disposal of class II material at this facility. This area was reportedly primarily utilized for the disposal of vegetation from the banks of the San Gabriel River from channel cleanup activities. It was estimated that this cut and cover operation would include approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material for disposal. A handwritten note included with the permit information indicated that the minimum elevation for disposal would be “-30 feet USC+GS for disposition of rubbish and refuse” and was included “not because of a threat of water pollution, but only from a consideration of the volume of fill material to be deposited.” Although this facility was georeferenced to be located in the southeastern portion of the Site along the San Gabriel River, the address is currently mapped to a location farther northwest of the Site. No maps or additional information regarding the location of this disposal facility were available to determine the extents and boundaries of the disposal area or to confirm whether this facility may have been located at the subject Site. Our Phase II investigation found no evidence of the referenced disposal so it is Northgate’s opinion that this disposal did not take place on the subject Site.
5.3.3 California Environmental Protection Agency Website The Site is listed on the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) website as a clean-up program at 6655 Marina Drive as the Chevron-Alamitos Bay Partnership and as a land disposal site at 6502 Pacific Coast Highway as the Flood Control District Dump. These listings correspond to the GeoTracker listings for the Site, as discussed in Section 5.3.2 above.
5.3.4 Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region Northgate submitted a file review request to the RWQCB. The RWQCB indicated that they do not have files for the Site. The RWQCB had records related to the former Chevron Seal Beach Gas Plant located at 6655 Marina Drive. This former gas plant has not been shown to have operated on the subject Site and records related to the operations and remediation of this former gas plant were reviewed on GeoTracker (Refer to Section 5.3.2 for discussion of the regulatory file review of the State Water Resource Control Board’s GeoTracker website).
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 19 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.3.5 City of Long Beach Fire Department
Northgate submitted a file review request to the Long Beach Fire Department (LBFD). The LBFD indicated that they do not have any records on file for the subject Site and referred the request to the City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health (Refer to Section 5.3.9 for discussion of the regulatory file review referred to the City of Long Beach, Department of Human health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health).
5.3.6 Los Angeles County Fire Department
The Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) maintains the Certified Unified Program Agency database lists online with property addresses identified as active or inactive facilities, as site mitigation facilities, and California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program facilities. The Site was not listed on any of the databases.
Northgate additionally submitted a file review request to the LACFD for additional information related to the database listing. At the time this report was prepared, no response had been received from the LACFD. Northgate will issue an addendum to this report if information subsequently received changes any of the conclusions or recommendations contained in this report.
5.3.7 Long Beach Certified Unified Program Agency
The Long Beach CUPA maintains information related to hazardous waste generator inspection programs, hazardous materials inspection and business plan programs, California accidental risk prevention programs, aboveground storage tank (AST) spill prevention, and other soil projects not related to underground storage tanks (USTs). The Long Beach CUPA also maintains records for AST and UST programs that include tank monitoring, tank installations, tank removals, site mitigation, soil sampling, site characterization, site remediation, and reports for ASTs, USTs, clarifiers, and hydraulic lifts.
The Long Beach CUPA indicated that they do not have any records on file for the subject Site and referred the request to the City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health. Refer to Section 5.3.9 for discussion of the regulatory file review referred to the City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 20 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.3.8 City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health
Northgate submitted a file review request to the City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health. The City of Long Beach, Department of Human Health Services/Bureau of Environmental Health indicated that they do not have any records on file for the subject Site.
5.3.9 Los Angeles County, Public Health Department
Northgate submitted a file review request to the Los Angeles County, Public Health Department.
The Los Angeles County, Public Health Department indicated that they do not have any records on file for the subject Site and referred the request to the City of Long Beach. Refer to Section
5.3.7 for discussion of the regulatory file review.
5.3.10 Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works
Northgate reviewed an online file review system maintained by the Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works (LADPW) for industrial waste, USTs, and stormwater discharge permits. The online system did not contain a listing for the subject Site.
5.3.11 South Coast Air Quality Management District
Northgate reviewed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) online Facility Information Detail database for any files available for the Site. The online system did not contain a listing for the subject Site.
5.3.12 National Pipeline Mapping System
Northgate reviewed the online National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) database to determine the location of pipelines located at the Site or within the vicinity of the Site. The review indicates that one or more buried pipelines are present along or beneath the northeastern boundary of the Site, parallel to East Pacific Coast Highway. This location corresponds to posted signage indicating the presence of a crude oil pipeline in the same area.
Information available from the NPMS indicates that the pipelines (shown in red on the image below) in this area include an active crude oil pipeline operated by Crimson Pipeline and two abandoned pipelines identified as empty without any further information regarding the previous contents. The image below is taken from the NPMS website and depicts the location of pipelines containing hazardous liquids as red lines (NPMS, 2021).
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 21 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Ten other oil pipelines were identified at the nearby facility to the northwest with diameters ranging from 2-inches to 12-inches.
5.3.13 Oil and Gas Wells
According to the EDR GeoCheck® - Physical Setting Source Addendum located in the EDR Radius Report (Appendix B), there are no oil and gas wells located on the subject Site and 255 oil and gas wells located within 1-mile of the Site. The nearest well is located approximately
0.16-miles northeast (cross-gradient) of the Site. The wells are generally located about 0.25 to 1- mile to the northwest, north, northeast, and east (upgradient) of the Site. Information available on the CalGEM website indicates that there are no wells located on the Site.
5.4 Other Environmental Issues
5.4.1 Floodplain Maps
Northgate reviewed the online version of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of Long Beach, Panel 1988G. The Site is listed within zone X, area with reduced flood risk due to levee (FEMA, 2021).
5.4.2 Radon
The California Department of Health Services’ (DHS’s) online list of indoor radon levels indicates radon concentrations from 49 indoor air samples collected in the zip code area 90803 were all less than 4.0 pico-curies per liter (pCi/L) (DHS, 2010). According to the EDR Radius Report (Appendix B), the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) radon zone for Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 22 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Los Angeles County is Zone 2 (indoor average level greater than or equal to 2 pCi/L and less than 4 pCi/L).
The State of California Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management maintains a database of radon test results indicating that 63 samples were collected in Los Angeles County in California and that the average activity was 0.711 pCi/L on the first level, unreported on the second level, and 0.933 pCi/L on the basement level. In the first level living area, 98-percent of the samples were less than 4 pCi/L, 2-percent were between 4 and 20 pCi/L, and 0-percent were above 20 pCi/L. No samples were reported for the second level, and all samples on the basement level were less than 4 pCi/L.
The DHS and the EPA recommend that some form of mitigation be conducted for houses with indoor radon concentrations of 4 pCi/L or greater. These results indicate that radon gas does not appear to constitute a significant environmental concern at the Site.
5.4.3 Methane
The City of Long Beach Municipal Code (LBMC) stipulates testing and potential mitigation measures for methane for construction in the vicinity of oil and gas wells and in areas near landfills within the City of Long Beach. Properties within the City’s Methane Gas Zone are subject to testing and potential mitigation in accordance with Chapter 18.79 of the LBMC. A review of the City’s methane gas zone GIS map showed that the Site is located within the methane zone and is within the boundaries of the Seal Beach Oil Field, which indicates the potential for methane and other volatile gases to occur at the Site. Northgate’s Phase II testing showed methane was detected at concentration that exceed the City’s methane action level as described in more detail in Section 10.2.3.
5.5 Land Use History
Information on historical land use at the Sites and adjacent area was evaluated by reviewing historic aerial photographs, maps, and other documents. A summary of our investigation findings is presented below.
5.5.1 Aerial Photographs
Northgate reviewed historic aerial photographs of the Sites from 1928, 1938, 1947, 1952, 1963, 1970, 1972, 1983, 1989, 1994, 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2016 obtained from EDR (EDR, 2021c). Copies of the aerial photographs are provided in Appendix D. A summary of our aerial photograph review is presented below.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 23 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Year: 1928 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: FAIR
Site Description: The Site is shown as undeveloped land located within the riverbed of the San Gabriel River.
Northeast: A road (Pacific Coast Highway) followed by undeveloped land and Seal Beach Oil Field production areas with visible pumping wells, aboveground storage tanks, various structures, and roads. The San Gabriel River is shown farther northeast of the Site.
Southeast: The San Gabriel River and riverbed followed by undeveloped land.
Southwest: The San Gabriel River and riverbed followed by undeveloped land.
Northwest: Undeveloped land and Seal Beach Oil Field production areas with visible pumping wells, aboveground storage tanks, various structures, roads, and potential drilling mud disposal pits.
Year: 1938 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA
Site Description: The Site is shown as vacant land but appears to have been filled and graded and is no longer occupied by the riverbed for the San Gabriel River.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1928 photograph except that the San Gabriel River has been channelized.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1928 photograph except that the San Gabriel River has been channelized.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1928 photograph except that the San Gabriel River has been channelized.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1928 photograph.
Year: 1947 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: FAIR
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1938 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1938 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1938 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1938 photograph, except that an industrial development is now present to the southwest of the Site beyond the San Gabriel River that includes several aboveground storage tanks, ponded areas, and industrial structures.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1938 photograph.
Year: 1952 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1947 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1947 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1947 photograph, except that an industrial development is now present farther to the southeast of the Site beyond the San Gabriel River that includes several aboveground storage tanks and structures.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1947 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1947 photograph.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 24 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Year: 1963 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USGS
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1952 photograph, except those large areas of darker soil are present across the Site, particularly in the northwestern portion of the Site.
Northeast: Pacific Coast Highway followed by vacant land graded for redevelopment then Seal Beach Oil Field production areas with pumping wells, aboveground storage tanks, and various structures. The San Gabriel River is shown farther northeast of the Site.
Southeast: The channelized San Gabriel River followed by industrial development including several large aboveground storage tanks and various structures then undeveloped land.
Residential land is now shown farther to the southeast of the Site.
Southwest: A road (Marina Drive) followed by commercial development and paved surface parking lots. A fully developed marina with slips for boat parking is now shown to the southwest of the Site.
Northwest: Vacant land graded for redevelopment followed by an industrial development that appears to be associated with the Seal Beach Oil Field areas followed by graded land being developed with a large hotel.
Year: 1970 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: EDR
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1963 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1963 photograph, except those portions of the Seal Beach Oil Field area have been graded and a road (2nd Street) now extends to the east and is located farther northeast of the Site.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1963 photograph., except that residential development has expanded farther southeast and southwest of the Site.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1963 photograph., except that residential development has expanded farther southeast and southwest of the Site.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1963 photograph., except that commercial development has expanded farther northwest of the Site and incudes a gasoline service station at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and 2n Street.
Year: 1972 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: EDR
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1970 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph, except those additional portions of the Seal Beach Oil Field area have been graded.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph., except that residential development has expanded farther southeast and southwest of the Site.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 25 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Year: 1983 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: EDR
Site Description: A large commercial office building is shown in the northern and central portion of the Site. The remainder of the Site is graded dirt land that appears to be occupied by vehicles and equipment for the redevelopment of the Site.
Northeast: Pacific Coast Highway followed by commercial development and Seal Beach Oil Field areas with visible pumping wells and aboveground storage tanks.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1972 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1970 photograph, except that the industrial development across Studebaker Road is no longer present and the land is now shown as primarily vacant land with a small structure.
Year: 1989 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA
Site Description: The Site is fully redeveloped with a commercial office building in the northern and central portions of the Site and asphalt paved parking occupying the remaining portion of the Site.
The Site configuration appears similar to the present day conditions.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1983 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1983 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1983 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1983 photograph, except that the property located across North Studebaker Road is now shown as an undeveloped dirt lot.
Year: 1994 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USGS/DOQQ
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1989 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1989 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1989 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1989 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1989 photograph, except that the property located across North Studebaker Road has been graded for redevelopment.
Year: 2002 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USGS/DOQQ
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 1994 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 1994 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 1994 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 1994 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 1994 photograph, except that property located across North Studebaker Road has been developed for commercial land use.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 26 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Year: 2005 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA/NAIP
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 2002 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 2002 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 2002 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 2002 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 2002 photograph.
Year: 2009 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA/NAIP
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 2005 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 2005 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 2005 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 2005 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 2005 photograph.
Year: 2012 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA/NAIP
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 2009 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 2009 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 2009 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 2009 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 2009 photograph.
Year: 2016 Scale: 1” = 500’ Source: USDA/NAIP
Site Description: The Site appears similar to the 2012 photograph.
Northeast: The area appears similar to the 2012 photograph.
Southeast: The area appears similar to the 2012 photograph.
Southwest: The area appears similar to the 2012 photograph.
Northwest: The area appears similar to the 2012 photograph.
5.5.2 Sanborn Maps
No Sanborn fire insurance maps were available for the Site following a search by EDR, as shown in Appendix E (EDR, 2021d).
5.5.3 Topographic Maps
Northgate reviewed historic topographic maps for the Site obtained from EDR for the years 1896, 1899, 1902, 1925, 1934, 1935, 1943, 1947, 1949, 1950, 1964/1965, 1972, 1981, and 2012.
Copies of the topographic maps are provided in Appendix F (EDR, 2021e). Information from the topographic maps is summarized below.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 27 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Quadrangle: Downey/Las Bolsas Scale: 1:62,500 Series: 15 Minute 1896:
The Site is entirely located within the wetlands of the Alamitos Bay. Several streams and rivers are located in the immediate Site vicinity. The Pacific Ocean is mapped to the southwest of the Site. Roads are located farther north and east of the Site.
Quadrangle: Downey Scale: 1:62,500 Series: 15 Minute
1899: The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1896 map. 1902: The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1899 map.
Quadrangle: Long Beach Scale: 1:24,000 Series: 7.5 Minute 1925:
The Site is entirely occupied by a portion of the wetlands that extend primarily to the southwest and northwest of the Site. The San Gabriel River is located to the southeast and southwest of the Site and extends to the Alamitos Bay located farther to the southwest of the Site. The Site vicinity is primarily undeveloped with several man-made ponds mapped to the northeast of the Site. Residential development is now shown farther to the southwest and northwest of the Site.
Quadrangle: Las Bolsas Scale: 1:62,500 Series: 15 Minute 1934: The Site and immediate vicinity are unmapped. Areas farther south of the Site are mapped with rivers and wetland areas followed by the Pacific Ocean.
Quadrangle: Los Alamitos/Seal Beach Scale: 1:31,680 Series: 7.5 Minute 1935:
The Site and immediate vicinity are unmapped. Areas farther south of the Site are mapped with the San Gabriel River followed by undeveloped land followed by a railroad track then residential development. The Pacific Ocean is mapped farther south and southwest of the Site.
Quadrangle: Las Bolsas/Downey Scale: 1:62,500 Series: 15 Minute 1943:
The Site is shown as undeveloped land. California State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway) is mapped adjacent to the northeast of the Site. The San Gabriel River is located adjacent to the southeast of the Site. Oil field developments including wells and aboveground storage tanks are mapped to the north of the Site. A railroad track followed by residential development is mapped farther to the south and west of the Site.
Quadrangle: Downey Scale: 1:50,000 Series: 15 Minute
1947: The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1943 map.
Quadrangle: Long Beach/Seal
Beach/Los Alamitos Scale: 1:24,000 Series: 7.5 Minute
1949:
The Site is shown as undeveloped land. Pacific Coast Highway is located adjacent to the northeast of the Site followed by an extensive oil well field.
The partially channelized San Gabriel River is mapped adjacent to the southeast of the Site followed by several aboveground storage tanks and a Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 28 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
sewage disposal site then residential development and the Pacific Ocean.
Undeveloped land is located adjacent to the southwest of the Site followed by the Alamitos Bay then residential development and the Pacific Ocean. A continuation of the oil field operations is located adjacent to the northwest of the Site followed by a “Marine Stadium” waterway then additional oil field operations and residential development.
Quadrangle: Los Alamitos/Seal Beach Scale: 1:24,000 Series: 7.5 Minute 1950: The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1949 map.
Quadrangle: Long
Beach/Los Alamitos/Seal Beach Scale: 1:24,000 Series: 7.5 Minute 1964/1965:
The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1950 map, except that a road is now located adjacent to the southwest of the Site (Marina Drive) followed by the marina that has been expanded to the west of the Site. The San Gabriel River has been fully channelized. An area formerly occupied by oil wells has been redeveloped for commercial land use to the northwest of the Site along Pacific Coast Highway. A substation powerplant and a second power plant are now mapped farther to the northeast of the Site that include several large aboveground storage tanks. A retarding basin is now located near the eastern most powerplant. Residential development has also expanded farther to the north, northeast, and southeast of the Site.
1972:
The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1964/1965 map, except that several large aboveground storage tanks have been installed at the substation powerplant development located farther to the northeast of the Site.
Residential development has also expanded farther to the south and northwest of the Site.
1981:
The Site and vicinity appear similar to the 1972 map, except that residential development has expanded in the Site vicinity primarily to the north and south of the Site. The substation powerplant and powerplant have both been expanded and now include additional large aboveground storage tanks farther to the northeast of the Site.
Quadrangle: Long Beach OE S/Seal
Beach/Los Alamitos/Long Beach Scale: 1:24,000 Series: 7.5 Minute 2012: The Site and vicinity are mapped as urban development.
5.5.4 City Directories
Northgate reviewed a summary of local city directory listings for the Site and nearby vicinity available at approximate five-year intervals from 1960 to 2014 obtained from EDR. A copy of the EDR city directory search, along with a tabular summary of the directory listings for the Site, is provided in Appendix G (EDR, 2021f).
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 29 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
The Site is identified at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway as a multi-tenant commercial office building between 1986 and 2014. Commercial tenants have primarily included financial companies, insurance groups, consulting businesses, and corporate offices.
Listings in the Site vicinity primarily include commercial and residential land uses. A drycleaner, Paradise Cleaners, was identified approximately 0.10-miles to the northwest (crossgradient) of the Site at 6608 Pacific Coast Highway between 2006 and 2014; however, this facility was additionally identified on the EDR Radius Report to have been present through at least 2018. Continental Oil Company of Long Beach was identified approximately 0.17-miles to the northeast (cross-gradient) of the Site ate 6601 Pacific Coast Highway in 1960 and 1964.
Listings of potential environmental concern are discussed further in Section 5.1.2 above.
5.6 Interviews
5.6.1 Owner Interview
The current Site owner/manager was interviewed via a Phase I ESA Questionnaire provided by Northgate. Mr. Spencer Sturken provide responses to the questionnaire on behalf of the Site owner/manager. He indicated that he has been associated with the Site for about five years and is a Finance and Due Diligence Real Estate Professional associated with the Site owner/Manager.
Mr. Sturken indicated that the Site is owned by ValueRock Congressional LLC, ValueRock Congressional II LLC, and ValueRock Congressional III LLC and that the Site is currently occupied by a multi-tenant development. He noted that the Sit has not been used previously or currently for any industrial uses. Mr., Sturken noted that an adjoining property to the northeast of the Site formerly operated as a landfill. He indicated that a transformer and hydraulic elevator are present at the Site.
Mr. Sturken was not aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the Site or any activity or land use restrictions or limitations associated with the Site. He was not aware of any specific chemicals, spills, or environmental cleanups at the Site. Mr. Sturken indicated that he was not aware of the current presence of any underground or aboveground storage tanks, environmental permits, hazardous waste generators, or notices of violation for the Site. He noted that a Phase I ESA was previously prepared for the Site by Partner in 2016. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix H.
5.6.2 Key Site Manager Interview
The current Site owner/manager was interviewed via a Phase I ESA Questionnaire provided by Northgate as summarized in Section 5.6.1 above.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 30 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
5.6.3 Site User Interview
The Site is currently occupied by multiple commercial office tenants. Only select tenant spaces were accessed during the Site reconnaissance due to individual occupancy and Covid-19 protocols. Interviews were not conducted with individual Site occupants. However, the User was interviewed as part of this assessment as summarized below.
Mr. Clement Tsay, the development manager of Holland Partner Group, was interviewed via a Phase I ESA Questionnaire provided by Northgate on behalf of the User. Mr. Tsay was not aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the Site or any activity or land use restrictions or limitations associated with the Site. He indicated that he is aware of a 25-foot oil line easement present on the subject Site along Pacific Coast Highway. Mr. Tsay was not aware of any specific chemicals, spills, or environmental cleanups at the Site. He indicated that he was not aware of the current presence of any underground or aboveground storage tanks, environmental permits, hazardous waste generators, or notices of violation for the Site. A copy of the questionnaire is included in Appendix H.
5.7 Previous Reports
Northgate reviewed the following documents obtained from regulatory agencies during our assessment related to the Site:
Los Angeles County Flood Control District Dump (I-5083-10), 6502 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California prepared by the County of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer dated 1961 (CLA, 1961)
As discussed previously in Section 5.1.2, this report does not pertain to the subject Site. The County of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer (CLA) prepared several letters and documents for the LACFCD to utilize a portion of the subject Site, identified at 6502 Pacific Coast Highway as a dump operating under an industrial waste permit. The LACFCD was issued an industrial waste permit to dispose of Class II materials; however, the dump was shown by review of EDR documents to apply to another property located northeast of the Site. It was reportedly used for the disposal of vegetation from channel cleanup activities along the banks of the San Gabriel River. It was estimated that approximately 25,000 cubic yards of material would be disposed of at this location. A handwritten note included with the permit information indicated that the minimum elevation for disposal would be “-30 feet USC+GS for disposition of rubbish and refuse” and was included “not because of a threat of water pollution, but only from a consideration of the volume of fill material to be deposited.” Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 31 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
Current Site conditions were observed during a Site and Site vicinity reconnaissance by Mr. Tom Danaher of Northgate on November 4, 2021. Mr. Danaher was accompanied by the Site Maintenance Manager (Mr. Edward Hill). Site photographs from the reconnaissance are attached at the end of this report.
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions
The Site reconnaissance was performed by traversing the Site on foot and the general vicinity by car. Only select individual tenant spaces of the commercial office building at the Site were accessed due to individual occupancy and Covid-19 protocols. However, given the availability of other information, this data gap does not appear to be significant. There were no other limiting conditions encountered during the Site reconnaissance.
6.2 General Site and Vicinity Conditions
6.2.1 Subject Site
The Site is bound by Pacific Coast Highway to the northeast, the San Gabriel River to the southeast, East Marina Drive to the southwest, and North Studebaker Road to the northwest. It is developed with an approximately 76,900 square foot two-story multi-tenant commercial office building that occupies the central and northern portions of the Site. Access to the Site is available via driveways from North Studebaker Road to the northwest of the Site. One-level of partially subterranean parking is present beneath the structure.
The remainder of the Site is occupied by asphalt paved surface parking are and landscaping.
Mild staining is present throughout the parking areas. Signage indicates that an 8-inch crude oil pipeline is buried along the northeastern portion of the Site parallel to Pacific Coast Highway.
No hazardous materials, wastes, or chemicals were observed to be stored or generated in any part of the Site. No evidence of any current USTs, sumps, clarifiers, or other subsurface features was identified during the reconnaissance.
6.2.2 Site Vicinity
The Site is bordered to the northeast by Pacific Coast Highway followed by an undeveloped dirt lot that is currently occupied by a seasonal pumpkin patch. Wetland areas and the San Gabriel River are located farther northeast of the Site. To the east, the Site is bordered by a recreational dirt path and the San Gabriel River followed by wetland areas and commercial development.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 32 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
East Marina Drive followed by a commercial retail development, then a marina is located southwest of the Site. Residential development, followed by the Pacific Ocean is located farther southwest of the Site. The Site is bordered to the northwest by North Studebaker Road, followed by commercial development. The Site is located within the Seal Beach Oil Field.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 33 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
7.0 PHASE I ESA CONCLUSIONS
This report presents the results of a Phase I ESA of the Marina II property located at 6700 Pacific Coast Highway in Long Beach, California. The purpose of the investigation is to identify the presence of RECs at the Site.
A REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following RECs were identified during the course of this assessment:
Northgate did not identify any RECs associated with the Site.
A CREC refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment:
Northgate did not identify any CRECs associated with the Site.
A HREC refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following HRECs were identified during the course of this assessment:
Northgate did not identify any HRECs associated with the Site.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 34 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
8.0 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
The primary objective of the Phase II ESA was to assess the potential presence of soil, soil vapor, and groundwater quality impacts related to historic land use operations at the Site or the Site vicinity.
Specifically, the Phase II focused on assessing the following potential environmental issues:
Although there is no record of any oil wells or oil production facilities on the Site, the Site is located within the boundaries of the Seal Beach Oil Field, which indicates the potential for migration of vapors onto the Site such as methane and other volatile natural gases.
Active and abandoned oil pipelines were identified along the northeastern portion of the Site along Pacific Coast Highway. There are no records or releases from these oil pipelines; however, their presence may represent a concern for the Site. The Site may have potentially been utilized as a disposal facility for the LACFCD in the 1960s for the disposal up to approximately 25,000 cubic yards of vegetation from channel cleanup activities from along the banks of the San Gabriel River. The facility received an industrial waste permit for this operation; however, the boundaries of this disposal facility have not been identified.
A part of the closure letter from the RWQCB for the Chevron Seal Beach Gas Plant property located adjacent to the northwest of the Site, it was noted that groundwater had been documented to be impacted with benzene that was attributed to an off-site source.
8.1 Scope of Work
The Phase II ESA was conducted in general accordance with Northgate’s Proposal for Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Marina II Property – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California dated November 5, 2021, and revised November 9, 2021 (Northgate, 2021). The scope of work included the following:
Site walk to mark the proposed boring locations, and notification to Dig Alert for underground utility clearance;
Preparing a Health and Safety Plan (HASP);
Obtaining permits from the City of Long Beach (COLB); Advancing nine borings to depths of up to 12 feet bgs for collecting soil, groundwater, and soil vapor samples at the Site;
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 35 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Analyzing 24 selected soil samples for TPH-g and TPH carbon chain (TPH-cc), 24 soil samples for VOCs, 24 soil samples for OCPs, 24 soil samples for SVOCs, 24 soil samples for Title 22 metals, 3 soil samples for PCBs, and 9 soil samples for asbestos; Analyzing eight groundwater samples for TPH-g/cc, VOCs, and dissolved metals; Installing eight temporary soil vapor sample probes generally at a depth of 5 feet bgs for collecting and analyzing soil vapor samples for oxygen, methane, VOCs, and TPH-g; and;
Preparing this report.
8.2 Authorization
This Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was authorized by Wactor & Wick on November 9, 2021 on behalf of its client Marina Shores Owner, LP.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 36 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
9.0 PHASE II ESA INVESTIGATION METHODS
Northgate conducted soil, groundwater, and soil vapor sampling at the Site between November 15 and 16, 2021. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 3.
9.1 Pre-Field Activities
On November 8, 2021, Northgate conducted a walk-through of the Site to mark proposed sampling locations and secure access. Other pre-field activities included the specific tasks outlined below.
9.1.1 Health and Safety Plan
Northgate prepared a Site-specific HASP for the Phase II ESA. The HASP was prepared in accordance with applicable federal and state regulations. The HASP addressed the potential for exposure to hazardous constituents and delineated the general safety procedures that are required for the safe operation of mechanical equipment to be used while conducting the field operations at the Site. The HASP also included a COVID-19 Prevention Program that is based on the U.S.
Department of Labor OSHA Guidance on Preparing Workplaces for COVID-19 (OSHA 3990- 03 2020) and in compliance with the March 19, 2020 Executive Order N-33-20 of the State Public Health Officer (the Order).
9.1.2 Clearance of Underground Utilities
Dig Alert was notified, as required by law, 48-hours prior to any intrusive activities began in order to locate utilities in the vicinity of the borings. In addition, Northgate contracted with Ground Penetrating Radar Systems, Inc., an independent geophysical utility locating company, to identify underground utilities and other subsurface obstructions so that the sampling locations were “clear” of any subgrade features.
9.1.3 Drilling Permits
Drilling permits for the borings were obtained from the COLB as required, prior to drilling.
Copies of the permits are provided in Appendix I.
9.2 Soil Sampling and Analysis
Nine borings (B-1 through B-8 and HA-1) were advanced across the Site as shown on Figure 3, and as described below:
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 37 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Boring B-1 was advanced in the northern corner of the Site in an area of historic soil staining and/or stockpiling, in the vicinity of current and abandoned oil pipelines, and on the upgradient side of the Site to assess potential off-Site impacts. Boring B-1 was advanced to 10 feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at 1 foot, 5 feet, and 10 feet bgs. Borings B-2, B-3, and B-8 were advanced in the northwestern portion of the Site in an area of historic soil staining and/or stockpiling. Borings B-2 and B-3 were advanced to 5 feet bgs and soil samples were collected at 1 foot and 5 feet bgs. Boring B-8 was advanced to 10 feet bgs and soil samples were collected at 1 foot, 5 feet, and 10 feet bgs. Boring B-4 were advanced in the northeastern portion of the Site in an area of historic soil staining and/or stockpiling and in the vicinity of current and abandoned oil pipelines.
Boring B-4 was advanced to 5 feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at 1 foot and 5 feet bgs.
Boring B-5 were advanced in the south-central portion of the Site for general Site characterization. Boring B-5 was advanced to 10 feet bgs. Soil samples were collected at 1 foot, 5 feet, and 10 feet bgs.
Borings B-6 and B-7 were advanced along the southeastern portion of the Site to assess downgradient subsurface quality and in the presumed potential location of the disposal site for material reportedly from the San Gabriel River cleanup. Boring B-6 was additionally located in the vicinity of current and abandoned oil pipelines. Boring B-6 was advanced to 12 feet bgs and soil samples were collected at 1 foot, 5 feet, 10 feet, and 12 feet bgs. Boring B-7 was advanced to 8 feet bgs and soil samples were collected at 1 foot, 5 feet, and 8 feet bgs.
One hand-auger boring (HA-1) was advanced on western side of the building to assess the soil quality from historical oil field operations. The boring was advanced to 5 feet bgs with soil samples collected at 1 foot and 5 feet bgs.
All borings were advanced by Interphase Environmental, Inc. of Commerce, California (Interphase), using a truck-mounted or track-mounted Geoprobe rig. During sampling, continuous cores of subsurface materials were collected in clear acetate liners. Upon removing the sampler from the borehole, the acetate liner containing the soil core was opened at various intervals, and soils were visually inspected and screened with a photoionization detector (PID) for the possible presence of contamination. Borings were logged in the field in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Copies of the boring logs are attached as Appendix J.
Sample intervals selected for non-volatile chemical analysis were cut from the liners, sealed with Teflon tape and plastic caps, labeled, and stored on ice in a cooler for transport to the testing laboratory under chain-of-custody control. Samples collected for TPH-g and VOC analysis were Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 38 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
collected using a LocknLoadTM sampler and preserved in methanol and sodium bisulfate in volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials in accordance with EPA Method 5035.
Soil samples were transported to Sunstar Laboratories, Inc. (SunStar), a California certified laboratory in Lake Forest, California, under chain-of-custody control for analysis. Soil samples were selectively analyzed for TPH-g/cc using EPA Method 8015M, VOCs using EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs using EPA Method 8270C, OCPs using EPA Method 8081, PCBs using EPA Method 8082, and for Title 22 metals using EPA Method 6010B/7471A. Additionally, the 1- foot bgs samples were also analyzed for asbestos using PLM. Soil sampling methodology is further described in Appendix K.
9.3 Groundwater Sampling
Grab-groundwater samples were collected from borings B-1 through B-8 (samples were identified as B-1-GW through B-8-GW, respectively) by lowering disposable tubing capped with a check-valve through the Geoprobe drive rods to a temporary well screen installed at the bottom of the boring. The borings were advanced to depths ranging between 10 and 15 feet bgs with groundwater encountered at a depth of approximately 5.5 to 13 feet bgs. Groundwater depth varied across the Site due to uneven elevations across the Site. The samples were placed in laboratory-supplied sample bottles, stored on ice in a cooler, and transported to SunStar under chain-of-custody control for analysis for TPH-g/cc using EPA Method 8015M, VOCs using EPA Method 8260B, and dissolved Title 22 Metals by Method 6010B/7471A. Groundwater sampling methodology is further described in Appendix K.
9.4 Soil Vapor Survey
Eight temporary soil vapor probes (SVPs) were installed at eight locations across the Site in borings B-1 through B-8, as shown on Figure 3. The SVPs were installed generally at a depth of 5 feet bgs in all eight locations, with the exception of boring B-3 which was installed at 4.5 feet bgs due to groundwater encountered at 5.5 feet bgs. The SVPs were installed using 2-1/4 inch inside-diameter hollow drill rods. The probe consisted of a 3/8" x 9" Stone PolyPro vapor probe implant with 1/4-inch Speed Fit installed at 5 feet bgs. Nylaflow tubing (3/16-inch diameter) was connected from the implant to the ground surface and terminated above the existing concrete slab. The borehole annulus around the implant and tubing was filled through the drill rods with sand 6 inches above and below the implant, 12 inches of dry bentonite placed 1 foot above the sand, and hydrated bentonite chips above the sand to the ground surface.
After installation, each SVP was allowed to stabilize for at least two hours. Prior to sampling, each probe was purged of approximately three-well volumes of air using an air sample pump set Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 39 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
at 150 milliliters per minute (ml/min). A vapor sample was then collected from each probe using a 1-liter, individually-certified clean summa canister and flow regulator that maintained a flow rate of 150 ml/min. Each sample was transported to SunStar under chain-of-custody control and analyzed for VOCs using EPA Method TO-15, for TPH-g using EPA Method TO-3, oxygen by ASTM D1946-90, and methane by gas chromatography (GC).
After the soil vapor survey was conducted, the SVPs were removed, and the borings were backfilled with hydrated bentonite to just below the ground surface and a plug at the ground surface to match existing conditions. Soil vapor sampling methodology is further described in Appendix K.
9.5 Data Evaluation Criteria
Analytical results from soil samples collected during this investigation were evaluated using the Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) established by the EPA Region 9 and the modified Screening Levels (SLs) established by the DTSC. The RSLs and DTSC SLs are health-based exposure concentrations to chemicals of concern in both residential and commercial land use. The RSLs and SLs are not regulatory cleanup standards. Soil samples analyzed for TPH were also evaluated using the RWQCB TPH Maximum Soil Screening Level (SSL). RWQCB screening levels are used to evaluate the potential threat to groundwater and were calculated based on the RWQCB Interim Site Assessment and Cleanup Guidebook procedures by applying attenuation factors, calculated based upon both distance above groundwater and the soil type(s), to establish California Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs), the State primary drinking water standard established under Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (RWQCB, 1996).
The presence of a chemical at a concentration above these standards does not necessarily indicate that adverse impacts to human health or the environment are present, but rather, indicate that a potential for adverse risk may exist and that additional evaluation may be warranted. However, in general practice, the absence of chemical constituents above these screening levels generally indicates that the Site is suitable for its intended use.
The groundwater sample analytical results were compared to the California and Federal MCLs.
Soil vapor sample analytical results were compared to EPA RSLs and DTSC SLs for residential and commercial land use. The RSLs and SLs have been developed for indoor air concentrations; therefore, RSLs and SLs for soil vapor were calculated using an attenuation factor (AF). An AF of 0.03 was applied to the EPA RSLs and DTSC SLs in accordance with the Draft Supplemental Guidance for Screening and Vapor Intrusion (DTSC/California Water Resource Control Boards, 2020). The new AF is currently being adopted as a screening value by local agencies; however, Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 40 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
this AF is very conservative and may be revised. In addition, methane results were compared to the Chapter 18.79 of the LBMC which stipulates 1,000 parts per million by volume (ppm) of methane as a minimum action level for mitigation.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 41 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
10.0 PHASE II INVESTIGATION RESULTS
10.1 Subsurface Conditions
Boring location B-2 through B-7 on the Site were covered with approximately four inches of concrete over 4 inches of aggregate base rock. Boring locations B-1, B-8, and HA-1 on the Site were covered with landscaping. Subsurface soils encountered during drilling generally consisted of silty sand to approximately 5 feet bgs, and silty clay or clayey silt to 13 feet bgs.
Groundwater was encountered in the borings at approximately 5.5 feet to 13 feet bgs. Boring locations are shown on Figure 3 and boring logs are attached in Appendix J.
10.2 Analytical Results
Analytical results for soil samples collected during this investigation are presented in Tables 1 (TPH and Asbestos), 2 (VOCs) and 3 (Title 22 metals), 4 (OCPs and SVOCs), and 5 (PCBs).
Groundwater sample analytical results are presented in Tables 6 (TPH), 7 (VOCs), and 8 (Title 22 metals). Soil vapor sample analytical results are presented in Table 9 (oxygen, methane, VOCs, and TPH-g). Copies of the laboratory analytical reports are presented in Appendix L. Analytical results are discussed in the following sections.
10.2.1 Soil Sample Analytical Results
As shown in Table 1, 1-foot soil samples were analyzed for asbestos in each boring advanced at the Site. Asbestos was not detected in any of the samples collected. As shown in Table 1, TPH as motor oil (TPH-mo) was detected in 4 out of the 24 samples (3 of the 9 borings). The concentrations ranged from 27 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 360 mg/kg which are all below regulatory screening levels (RSLs and SSLs) and would not be considered a hazardous waste. However, the soil with TPH-mo concentrations may not be acceptable for reuse at unrestricted land sites. The highest TPH-mo concentration was in B-6 (360 mg/kg) at 5 feet bgs in the southeast corner of the Site close to the oil pipeline right-of-way. TPH was not detected in the 10-foot sample from B-6. TPH-g and TPH as diesel (TPH-d) were not detected above the laboratory reporting limits (RLs) in any soil samples.
As shown in Table 2, volatile organic compounds (“VOCs”) were detected in 15 of the 24 samples collected and consisted of predominantly acetone (12 samples) at concentrations ranging between 2.9 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) to 23 µg/kg. Acetone is a common laboratory contaminant. Benzene and toluene were detected in sample B-2-2 at a concentration of 0.74 µg/kg and 0.43 µg/kg, respectively, and chloromethane was detected in sample B-4-1 at a concentration of 2.2 µg/kg. All VOC concentrations were below the regulatory screening levels Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 42 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
(SSLs, RSLs and DTSC SLs) and would not be considered a regulated material or hazardous waste.
As shown in Table 3, several metals were detected in soil; however, with the exception of arsenic, were at normal background concentrations, below the RSLs and DTSC SLs local action levels. Arsenic was detected at 1- foot bgs in two samples, B-2 at 2.2 mg/kg and B-5 at 16 mg/kg. The sample from B-5 slightly exceeded the background concentration in California established by the DTSC of 12 mg/kg.
As shown in Table 4, the organochlorinated pesticide (“OCP”) 4,4’-DDE was detected in B-7-1 at 5.6 µg/kg. The reported concentration is well below the regulatory screening levels. No other OCPs were detected above the laboratory RLs in any other soil samples. As shown in Table 4, semi-volatile compounds (“SVOCs”) were not detected above the laboratory RLs in any soil samples.
As shown in Table 5, polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) were analyzed in 3 soil samples (B-3- 1, B-5-1, and B-6-5) where TPH detections were the highest. PCBs were not detected above the laboratory RLs in any of the soil samples.
10.2.2 Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results
As shown in Tables 6 through 8, contaminants were not reported in any of the groundwater samples above regulatory action levels beneath the Site.
10.2.3 Soil Vapor Analytical Results
As shown in Table 9, TPH-g was above the commercial vapor intrusion screening levels (using the very conservative attenuation factor of 0.03) at SVPs installed in borings B-1, B-3, B-4, B-6, and B-7. TPH-g was above the residential vapor intrusion screening levels (using the very conservative attenuation factor of 0.03) at all eight borings B-1 through B-8. Benzene (at B-1, B-4, B-5, B-7, and B-8), chloroform (at B-2 and B-4), and PCE (at B-6) concentrations were above the commercial vapor intrusion screening levels (using the very conservative attenuation factor of 0.03). Benzene, bromodichloromethane, chloroform, ethylbenzene, PCE, and TCE concentrations were above the residential vapor intrusion screening levels (using the very conservative attenuation factor of 0.03) at one or more locations. Methane was above the City of Long Beach action level 1,000 ppm] in samples collected from SVPs B-3 and B-4.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 43 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
11.0 PHASE II ESA CONCLUSIONS
Northgate conducted a Phase II ESA to investigate areas of the Site which might contain hazardous substances or petroleum products related to the historic uses of the Site and vicinity, the current pipelines, or methane from underlying oil-bearing formations beneath downtown Long Beach. Nine borings (B-1 through B-8 and HA-1) were advanced across the Site with soil samples collected at depths of 1, 5, 8, 10 and/or 12 feet bgs and selectively sampled for TPH, VOCs, metals, SVOCs, OCPs, PCBs, and asbestos. Soil vapor probes were installed in eight of the borings (B-1 through B-8) at an approximate depth of 5 feet bgs with samples analyzed for methane, oxygen, VOCs, and TPH-g. Eight of the borings (B-1 through B-8) were advanced to groundwater with grab groundwater samples collected and analyzed for TPH, VOCs, and metals.
Based on the soil analytical results, none of the soil samples collected at the Site exceeded regulatory screening levels with the exception of arsenic which slightly exceeded generally accepted background concentrations at 1-foot bgs in boring B-5. While TPH did not exceed regulatory screening levels, there were isolated detections of TPH that could preclude soil export for sites with unrestricted use but would not affect use of the soil for on-Site backfill.
Analytical groundwater results were all less than the regulatory screening levels.
Soil vapor analytical results indicated that TPH-g and several VOCs exceeded screening levels, such as benzene and chloroform (across the Site), and isolated detections of bromodichloromethane, ethylbenzene, PCE, and TCE. Methane was detected in two locations (B-3 and B-4) above City action levels.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 44 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
12.0 LIMITATIONS
The purpose of a geologic/hydrogeologic study is to reasonably characterize existing site conditions based on the geology/hydrogeology of the area. In performing such a study, it is understood that a balance must be struck between a reasonable inquiry into the site conditions and an exhaustive analysis of each conceivable environmental characteristic. The following paragraphs discuss the assumptions and parameters under which such an opinion is rendered.
No investigation is thorough enough to describe all geologic/hydrogeologic conditions of interest at a given site. If conditions have not been identified during the study, such a finding should not therefore be construed as a guarantee of the absence of such conditions at the site, but rather as the result of the services performed within the scope, limitations, and cost of the work performed.
We are unable to report on or accurately predict events that may change the site conditions after the described services are performed, whether occurring naturally or caused by external forces.
We assume no responsibility for conditions we were not authorized to evaluate, or conditions not generally recognized as predictable when services were performed.
Geologic/hydrogeologic conditions may exist at the site that cannot be identified solely by visual observation. Where subsurface exploratory work was performed, our professional opinions are based in part on interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent actual conditions at unsampled locations.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 45 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
13.0 REFERENCES
Advanced Environmental Concepts, Inc. (AEC), 2016. Soil and Groundwater Assessment, for the Pumpkin Patch, 7001 East Pacific Coast Highway, County of Los Angeles, Long Beach, California. July 2016.
California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division, Well Finder Website - https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx California Department of Health Services (DHS), 2010. California Indoor Radon Levels Sorted by Zip Code. Online address:
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/healthinfo/environhealth/Pages/Radon.aspx. Updated March 28.
California Department of Water Resources (CDWR), Southern District. 1961. Bulletin No. 104, Planned Utilization of the Ground Water Basins of the Coastal Plain of Los Angeles County, Appendix A - Ground Water Geology. June.
County of Los Angeles, Department of County Engineer (CLA), 1961. Los Angeles County Flood Control District Dump (I-5083-10), 6502 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California.
Department of Toxic Substances Control/California Water Resource Control Boards), 2020.
Draft Supplemental Guidance for Screening and Vapor Intrusion.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), 2021a. EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search, Marina II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 2. ________, 2021b. The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®, Marina II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 2.
________, 2021c. The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package, Marina II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 2.
________, 2021d. Certified Sanborn® Map Report, Marina II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 1.
________, 2021e. The EDR Historical Topographic Map Report, Marina II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 1.
________, 2021f. The EDR-City Directory Abstract, Marina199 II, 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, CA 90803. November 3.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 46 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2021. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #06037C1988Gfor City of Long Beach, California. Revised April 21.
Levine-Fricke, 1994. Excavation Closure Report, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Property, 6655 Marina Drive, Long Beach, California. June 21, 1994.
Los Angeles County Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB), 1996. Interim Site Assessment & Cleanup Guidebook. May.
Northgate Environmental Management, Inc. (Northgate), 2021. Proposal for Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Marina II Property – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California. November 5.
National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS), 2021.
https://pvnpms.phmsa.dot.gov/PublicViewer/. Accessed on November 1.
PlaceWorks, 2017. Southeast Area Specific Plan, City of Long Beach. August.
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments 47 December 8, 2021 Marina II – 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312, and I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Nicky G. Robinson, PE
Senior Engineer
Derrick S. Willis
Principal
Qualifications of the Environmental Professionals are provided in Appendix M.
TABLES
TABLE 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Asbestos and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Asbestos (PLM)
% EPA 8015B/5035
(µg/kg)
Asbestos C13-C28
(DRO)
C29-C40
(MORO) C6-C12 (GRO)
B-1 B-1-1 1 11/15/21 ND <10 <10 <460
B-1 B-1-5 5 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <430
B-1 B-1-10 10 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <400
B-2 B-2-1 1 11/15/21 ND <10 <10 <420
B-2 B-2-5 5 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <430
B-3 B-3-1 1 11/15/21 ND <10 84 <360
B-3 B-3-5 5 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <430
B-4 B-4-1 1 11/16/21 ND <10 <10 <430
B-4 B-4-5 5 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <420
B-5 B-5-1 1 11/16/21 ND <10 250 <550
B-5 B-5-5 5 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <560
B-5 B-5-10 10 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <470
B-6 B-6-1 1 11/16/21 ND <10 27 <410
B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/21 -- <10 360 <400
B-6 B-6-10 10 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <370
B-6 B-6-12 12 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <520
B-7 B-7-1 1 11/16/21 ND <10 <10 <420
B-7 B-7-5 5 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <380
B-7 B-7-8 8 11/16/21 -- <10 <10 <490
B-8 B-8-1 1 11/15/21 ND <10 <10 <380
B-8 B-8-5 5 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <460
B-8 B-8-10 10 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <370
HA-1 HA-1-1 1 11/15/21 ND <10 <10 <620
HA-1 HA-1-5 5 11/15/21 -- <10 <10 <390
NE 560 30,000 420,000
NE NE NE NE
NE 500 NE 18,000,000
NA 100 1,000 100,000
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit -- Not tested
mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram (units)
µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ND Not detected
NA Not applicable
NE Not Established
PLM Polorized Light Microscopy
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated November 2021 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels for Soil Analytes, June 2020 SSL RWQCB Maximum Soil Screening Levels - Distance to groundwater less than 20 feet, Interim Site Assessment Cleanup Guidance, May 1996.
TPH (DRO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel TPH (GRO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline TPH (MORO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil EPA Commercial Soil RSLs
DTSC Commercial Soil SLs (cancer endpoint)
DTSC Commercial Soil SLs (non-cancer endpoint)
RWQCB TPH Max SSL Less Than 20 feet Above Groundwater
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EPA 8015B
(mg/kg)
Location or
Boring ID
Field
Sample ID
Sample Depth
in feet bgs Sample Date
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
Marina II - 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 2
Summary of Soil Analytical Results - Volatile Organic Compounds Acetone Benzene Chloromethane Ethylbenzene m,p-Xylene Naphthalene o-Xylene Tetrachloroethene Toluene
Trichloroethene
B-1 B-1-1 1 11/15/21 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-1 B-1-5 5 11/15/21 3.6 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <3.8 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 B-1 B-1-10 10 11/15/21 5.6 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 B-2 B-2-1 1 11/15/21 <1.9 0.74 <1.9 <1.9 <3.8 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 0.43 <1.9 B-2 B-2-5 5 11/15/21 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <4.2 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 B-3 B-3-1 1 11/15/21 6.3 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <3.5 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 B-3 B-3-5 5 11/15/21 7.0 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <4.4 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 B-4 B-4-1 1 11/16/21 <2.0 <2.0 2.2 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 B-4 B-4-5 5 11/16/21 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-5 B-5-1 1 11/16/21 23 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-5 B-5-5 5 11/16/21 8.4 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 <5.6 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 <2.8 B-5 B-5-10 10 11/16/21 2.9 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <4.4 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 B-6 B-6-1 1 11/16/21 8.9 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <4.5 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/21 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-6 B-6-10 10 11/16/21 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-6 B-6-12 12 11/16/21 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-7 B-7-1 1 11/16/21 19 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-7 B-7-5 5 11/16/21 3.2 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <5.0 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 B-7 B-7-8 8 11/16/21 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 B-8 B-8-1 1 11/15/21 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <3.8 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 <1.9 B-8 B-8-5 5 11/15/21 <110 <110 <110 <110 <220 <110 <110 <110 <110 <110 B-8 B-8-10 10 11/15/21 5.0 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <4.2 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 HA-1 HA-1-1 1 11/15/21 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <4.2 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 HA-1 HA-1-5 5 11/15/21 8.3 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <4.4 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 RWQCB SSL Less Than 20 feet Above Groundwater (Assuming Silty Lithology) NE 11 NE 2,000 NE NE 5,300 NE 450 NE DTSC-SL - Commercial Cancer Soil (June 2020) NE 1,400 NE NE NE 6,500 NE 2,700 NE NE DTSC-SL - Commercial Non-Cancer Soil (June 2020) NE 46,000 NE NE NE 570000 NE 390000 5,300,000 NE EPA RSL - Industrial Soil (November 2021) 1,100,000,000 5,100 460,000 25,000 2,400,000 NE 2,800,000 100,000 47,000 6,000 DTSC-SL - Residential Cancer Soil (June 2020) NE 330 NE NE NE 2,000 NE 590 NE NE DTSC-SL - Residential Non-Cancer Soil (June 2020) NE 11,000 NE NE NE 130,000 NE 81,000 1,100,000 NE EPA RSL - Residential Soil (November 2021) 70,000,000 1,200 110,000 5,800 560,000 NE 640,000 24,000 4,900 940 Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit -- Not tested
µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ND Not Detected
NE Not Established
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated November 2021 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels for Soil Analytes, June 2020 SSL RWQCB Maximum Soil Screening Levels - Distance to groundwater less than 20 feet, Interim Site Assessment Cleanup Guidance, May 1996.
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
EPA 8260B/5035 (µg/kg)
Location or
Boring ID
Field Sample
ID
Sample Depth in
feet bgs Sample Date
Volatile Organic Compounds
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
Marina II - 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 3
Summary of Soil and Concrete Analytical Results - Title 22 Metals EPA 7471A
Soil (mg/kg)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Lead
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Mercury
B-1 B-1-1 1 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 20 <1.0 <2.0 7.6 3.3 4.2 <3.0 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 12 33 <0.10 B-1 B-1-5 5 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 76 <1.0 <2.0 13 7.6 13 4.1 <5.0 9.8 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 27 40 <0.10 B-1 B-1-10 10 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 87 <1.0 <2.0 20 7.6 21 5.9 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 39 53 <0.10B-2 B-2-1 1 11/15/21 <3.0 2.2 76 <1.0 0.29 15 7.3 15 5.0 1.0 10 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 28 41 <0.10 B-2 B-2-5 5 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 89 <1.0 <2.0 13 8.7 9.5 <3.0 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 31 47 <0.10B-3 B-3-1 1 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 74 <1.0 <2.0 17 7.5 15 3.6 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 29 39 <0.10B-3 B-3-5 5 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 60 <1.0 <2.0 11 6.7 8.0 <3.0 <5.0 7.3 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 24 35 <0.10B-4 B-4-1 1 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 65 <1.0 <2.0 14 7.2 13 3.4 <5.0 9.4 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 28 37 <0.10 B-4 B-4-5 5 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 60 <1.0 <2.0 16 7.8 14 3.5 <5.0 10 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 32 43 <0.10B-5 B-5-1 1 11/16/21 <3.0 16 55 <1.0 <2.0 18 9.4 19 6.5 <5.0 13 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 33 46 <0.10 B-5 B-5-5 5 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 66 <1.0 <2.0 13 6.8 13 3.6 <5.0 9.1 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 26 35 <0.10 B-5 B-5-10 10 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 68 <1.0 <2.0 9.4 6.1 7.8 <3.0 <5.0 7.1 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 21 30 <0.10 B-6 B-6-1 1 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 77 <1.0 <2.0 14 6.6 14 36 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 30 48 <0.10 B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 76 <1.0 <2.0 12 6.3 33 14 <5.0 9.2 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 24 41 <0.10 B-6 B-6-10 10 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 76 <1.0 <2.0 18 9.8 16 4.0 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 37 48 <0.10 B-6 B-6-12 12 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 68 <1.0 <2.0 8.2 5.2 7.3 <3.0 <5.0 6.4 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 18 30 <0.10 B-7 B-7-1 1 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 71 <1.0 <2.0 12 6.3 15 28 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 24 51 <0.10 B-7 B-7-5 5 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 72 <1.0 <2.0 13 7.0 13 4.8 <5.0 9.4 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 27 44 <0.10 B-7 B-7-8 8 11/16/21 <3.0 <5.0 37 <1.0 <2.0 6.4 3.8 4.5 <3.0 <5.0 4.6 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 15 18 <0.10 B-8 B-8-1 1 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 69 <1.0 <2.0 12 6.2 16 6.6 <5.0 7.7 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 25 40 <0.10 B-8 B-8-5 5 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 80 <1.0 <2.0 16 9.0 12 <3.0 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 33 50 <0.10B-8 B-8-10 10 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 100 <1.0 <2.0 14 8.1 15 <3.0 <5.0 10 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 29 40 <0.10 HA-1 HA-1-1 1 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 88 <1.0 <2.0 15 7.5 15 9.4 <5.0 10 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 31 45 <0.10HA-1 HA-1-5 5 11/15/21 <3.0 <5.0 67 <1.0 <2.0 15 7.2 14 9.7 <5.0 11 <5.0 <2.0 <5.0 27 52 <0.10 31 0.68 15,000 160 7.1 120,000 23 3,100 400 390 1,500 390 390 0.78 390 23,000 11 NE 0.11 NE 1,600 910 NE NE NE NE NE 15,000 NE NE NE NE NE NENE 0.41 NE 16 71 NE NE NE NE NE 820 NE NE NE NE NE 1.00 470 3 220,000 2,300 100 1,800,000 350 47,000 800 5,800 22,000 5,800 5,800 12 5,800 350,000 46 NE 0.36 NE 6,900 4,000 NE NE NE NE NE 64,000 NE NE NE NE NE NENE 4.2 NE 230 780 NE NE NE 320 NE 11,000 NE NE NE NE NE 4.4 NA 12 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Notes/Abbreviations:
Concentrations exceed the established background concentration * EPA RSl for Chromium III
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory method reporting limit mg/kg Milligrams per kilogram (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NA Not applicable
NE Screening Level Not Established
RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated May 2021 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels for Soil Analytes, June 2020
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
Location or
Boring ID
Field
Sample ID
Sample Depth
in feet bgs Sample Date
EPA 6010b
(mg/kg)
Metals
EPA Residential Soil RSLs DTSC Residential Soil SLs (cancer endpoint)EPA Commercial Soil RSLs DTSC Commercial Soil SLs (non-cancer endpoint)Arsenic background concentration DTSC Commercial Soil SLs (cancer endpoint)DTSC Residential Soil SLs (non-cancer endpoint) Phase I and II Environmental Site AssessmentsMarina II - 6700 Pacific Coast HighwayLong Beach, California 1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 4
Summary of Soil Analytical Results -
Organochlorine Pesticides and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds SVOCs
EPA 8270C
(µg/kg)
4,4´-DDD
4,4´-DDE4,4´-DDT
Dieldrin
gamma-Chlordane
All SVOCs
B-1 B-1-1 1 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-1 B-1-5 5 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-1 B-1-10 10 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-2 B-2-1 1 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-2 B-2-5 5 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-3 B-3-1 1 11/15/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-3 B-3-5 5 11/15/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-4 B-4-1 1 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-4 B-4-5 5 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-5 B-5-1 1 11/16/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-5 B-5-5 5 11/16/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-5 B-5-10 10 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-6 B-6-1 1 11/16/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-6 B-6-10 10 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-6 B-6-12 12 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-7 B-7-1 1 11/16/21 <5.0 5.6 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-7 B-7-5 5 11/16/21 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 ND
B-7 B-7-8 8 11/16/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-8 B-8-1 1 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-8 B-8-5 5 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
B-8 B-8-10 10 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
HA-1 HA-1-1 1 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
HA-1 HA-1-5 5 11/15/21 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 ND
1,900 2,000 1,900 34 36,000 NA
2,300 2,000 1,900 34 1,700 NA
9,600 9,300 8,500 140 500,000 NA
6200 9,300 7,100 93 6,100 NA
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NA Not Applicable
ND Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory method reporting limit RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated November 2021 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels for Soil Analytes, June 2020 SVOCs Semi-volatile Organic Compound
EPA Residential Soil RSLs
DTSC Residential Soil SLs
EPA Commercial Soil RSLs
DTSC Commercial Soil SLs
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
Location or
Boring ID
Field
Sample ID
Sample Depth in
feet bgs Sample Date
EPA 8081A
(µg/kg)
Organochlorine Pesticides
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
Marina II - 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 5
Summary of Soil Analytical Results - Polychlorinated Biphenyls PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254PCB-1260
B-3 B-3-1 1 11/15/21 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 B-5 B-5-1 1 11/16/21 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/21 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 4,100 200 170 230 230 240 240
6,600 200 170 230 230 240 240
27,000 830 720 950 940 970 990
17,000 530 490 580 580 590 600
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit µg/kg Micrograms per kilogram (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Control
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NA Not Applicable
ND Not detected
NE Screening Level Not Established
PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyls
RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated November 2021 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels for Soil Analytes, June 2020
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
EPA Residential Soil RSLs
EPA Commercial Soil RSLs
DTSC Commercial Soil SLs (cancer endpoint)
DTSC Residential Soil SLs
Location
or Boring
ID
Field
Sample
ID
Sample Depth
in feet bgs Sample Date
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
EPA 8082
(µg/kg)
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
Marina II - 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 6
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EPA 8015B
(µg/l)
C13-C28
(DRO)
C29-C40
(MORO)
C6-C12
(GRO)
B-1 B-1-GW 11/15/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50B-2 B-2-GW 11/15/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50B-3 B-3-GW 11/15/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50B-4 B-4-GW 11/16/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50B-5 B-5-GW 11/16/21 0.088 <0.10 <50 B-6 B-6-GW 11/16/21 0.11 <0.11 <50B-7 B-7-GW 11/16/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50B-8 B-8-GW 11/15/21 <0.050 <0.10 <50
NE NE NE
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit µg/l Micrograms per liter (units)
mg/l Milligrams per liter (units)
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported Chemical Concentration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
TPH (DRO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as dieselTPH (GRO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline TPH (MORO) Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil California MCLs1
Location or
Boring ID Field Sample ID Sample Date
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
EPA 8015B
(mg/l)
Phase I and II Environmental Site AssessmentsMarina II - 6700 Pacific Coast HighwayLong Beach, California 1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 7
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - Volatile Organic Compounds Acetone
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
m,p-Xylene
Naphthalene
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
B-1 B-1-GW 11/15/21 1.7 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0B-2 B-2-GW 11/15/21 6.4 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0B-3 B-3-GW 11/15/21 2.6 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0B-4 B-4-GW 11/16/21 2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 B-5 B-5-GW 11/16/21 3.0 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 B-6 B-6-GW 11/16/21 2.3 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0B-7 B-7-GW 11/16/21 3.3 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 <1.0B-8 B-8-GW 11/15/21 17 <1.0 <1.0 <4.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 NE 1.0 300 1,750 NE 1,750 5.0 150 5.0
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit µg/l Micrograms per liter
Bold Reported chemical concentration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
NE Not Established
1 Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water in California (October 2018) California MCLs1
Volatile Organic Compounds
EPA 8260B (µg/l)
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
Location or
Boring ID Field Sample ID Sample Date
Phase I and II Environmental Site AssessmentsMarina II - 6700 Pacific Coast HighwayLong Beach, California 1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 8
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results - Title 22 Metals Barium Molybdenum Other Metals
B-1 B-1-GW 11/15/21 179 70.9 ND
B-2 B-2-GW 11/15/21 188 142 ND
B-3 B-3-GW 11/15/21 212 128 ND
B-4 B-4-GW 11/16/21 <50 131 ND
B-5 B-5-GW 11/16/21 55.0 71.6 ND
B-6 B-6-GW 11/16/21 <50 <50 ND
B-7 B-7-GW 11/16/21 <50 54.6 ND
B-8 B-8-GW 11/15/21 69.6 <50 ND
1,000 NE NA
Notes/Abbreviations:
< Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting limit µg/l Micrograms per liter
Bold Reported chemical concentration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ND Not detected
NA Not applicable
NE Not Established
1 Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water in California (October 2018) California MCLs1
Location or
Boring ID Field Sample ID Sample Date
Metals
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
EPA 6010B/7471
(ug/l)
Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments
Marina II - 6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, California
1 of 1 December 8, 2021
TABLE 9
Summary of Soil Vapor Analytical Results - Oxygen, Methane, Volatile Organic Compounds, and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline Oxygen Methane
GC
(%)
SUN-GC-008
(ppm(v))
TO-3/TO-14 m
(µg/m³ Air)
Oxygen
Methane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
4-Ethyltoluene
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Carbon Disulfide
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Cyclohexane
Ethylbenzene
Heptane
Hexane
Isopropyl alcohol
m,p-Xylene
Methyl isobutyl ketone
o-Xylene
Styrene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
C6-C12 (GRO)
B-1 B-1-5 5 11/16/2021 7.32 170 <4.1 19 <31 <5.0 <31 <31 15 5.8 68 62 <6.8 360 4.2 18 <3.5 39 110 100 <13 140 9.8 37 <4.3 <6.9 260 49 <5.7 7,930 B-2 B-2-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.71 300 <4.1 46 <31 21 <31 <31 26 11 89 12 7.3 8.7 <4.7 23 <3.5 33 15 14 6.9 150 36 49 3.6 6.0 110 <5.5 <5.7 2,690 B-3 B-3-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.90 2,200 7.0 24 4.2 <5.0 3.5 4.0 36 6.4 120 7.3 <6.8 170 <4.7 15 <3.5 16 23 26 6.7 67 24 26 2.6 <6.9 47 <5.5 <5.7 5,810 B-4 B-4-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.68 1,900 <4.1 25 <31 9.2 <31 <31 49 6.0 180 18 <6.8 410 <4.7 25 <3.5 17 31 53 <13 70 44 23 <4.3 6.3 76 12 <5.7 4,490B-5 B-5-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.65 150 <4.1 23 <31 <5.0 <31 <31 160 5.7 600 21 <6.8 250 <4.7 5.2 <3.5 15 29 47 24 57 59 23 2.4 <6.9 50 <5.5 <5.7 3,090 B-6 B-6-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.69 <8.4 <4.1 26 6.6 9.4 5.6 6.4 46 7.3 190 11 <6.8 79 3.3 11 <3.5 12 51 130 13 49 37 19 4.1 620 46 17 3.4 6,610 B-7 B-7-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.67 40 <4.1 22 <31 <5.0 <31 <31 130 6.2 470 19 <6.8 31 <4.7 <5.0 27 19 35 44 11 67 26 24 2.0 <6.9 98 <5.5 <5.7 4,640 B-8 B-8-5 5 11/16/2021 <1.70 6.5 <4.1 20 <31 <5.0 <31 <31 33 6.2 120 47 <6.8 41 <4.7 10 <3.5 28 77 48 <13 100 29 31 1.8 <6.9 180 20 <5.7 3,820 NA 1,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Commercial/Industrial Screening Levels for Comparison
7.7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.42 0.33 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2 -- -- -- -- 3,500 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13 350 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,900 180 1,300 -- -- --
7.7 260 880 260 -- 1.1 22,000 -- -- 1.6 0.33 3,100 220 0.53 26,000 4.9 1,800 3,100 880 440 13,000 440 4,400 47 22,000 3 5,300 130 Calculated DTSC-SL - Commercial Soil Vapor (default AF of 0.03) -- -- 257 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 67 -- -- -- -- Calculated EPA RSL - Commercial Soil Vapor (default AF of 0.03) -- -- 257 8,667 29,333 8,667 -- 37 733,333 -- -- 53 11 103,333 7,333 18 866,667 163 60,000 103,333 29,333 14,667 433,333 14,667 146,667 1,567 733,333 100 176,667 4,333 Residential Screening Levels for Information Purposes OnlyDTSC-Screening Level (SL) Residential Cancer Air (June 2020) 1.8 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.097 0.076 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.46 -- -- -- -- DTSC-SL Residential Non-Cancer Air (June 2020) 830 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.1 83 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 940 42 310 -- -- --EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Air Residential (November 2021) 1.8 63 210 63 -- 0.26 5,200 -- -- 0.36 0.076 730 52 0.12 6,300 1.1 420 730 210 100 3,100 100 1,000 11 5,200 0.48 1,300 31Calculated DTSC-SL - Residential Soil Vapor (default AF of 0.03) -- -- 60 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.2 3 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15 -- -- -- --Calculated EPA RSL - Residential Soil Vapor (default AF of 0.03) -- -- 60 2,100 7,000 2,100 -- 8.7 173,333 -- -- 12 3 24,333 1,733 4 210,000 37 14,000 24,333 7,000 3,333 103,333 3,333 33,333 367 173,333 16 43,333 1,033 Notes/Abbreviations:
Concentrations exceed residential screening levels for AF of 0.03Concentrations exceed residential and commercial screening levels for AF of 0.03 < Not detected at or above the indicated laboratory reporting lim -- Not applicable or no published value
% percentage
µg/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter (units)
AF Attenuation factor
bgs Below ground surface
Bold Reported chemical concentration
DTSC Department of Toxic Substances Contro
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
GC Gas chromotography
ND Not detected
(ppm(v)) parts per million by volume
RSL US EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels, updated November 202 SL DTSC HHRA Note 3 Recommended Screening Levels, June 202
REGULATORY SCREENING CRITERIA
DTSC-Screening Level (SL) Commercial Cancer Air (June 2020)DTSC-SL Commercial Non-Cancer Air (June 2020)EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) Summary Air Industrial (November 2021) Location or
Boring ID Field Sample ID Sample Depth in feet bgs Sample Date TO-15
(µg/m³ Air)
Volatile Organic Compounds
City of Long Beach Methane Action Level
Phase I and II Environmental Site AssessmentsMarina II - 6700 Pacific Coast HighwayLong Beach, California 1 of 1 December 8, 2021
FIGURES
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX A
TITLE REPORT AND THE EDR ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN AND AUL SEARCH Combined Report 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Combined 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA
90803
10/27/2021 Page 1 (of 1)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Property Address:
6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Property Profile 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Property Profile 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 1 (of 2)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Property Information
Owner(s): LLC / VALUEROCK CONGRESSIONAL /
VALUEROCK CONGRESSIONAL II LLC Mailing Address: 18301 VON KARMAN AVE #850, IRVINE, CA 92612 Owner Phone: Unknown Property Address: 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Vesting Type: Alt. APN:
County: LOS ANGELES APN: 7242-012-006
Map Coord: 80-D1 : Census Tract: 577604
Lot#: 1 Block:
Subdivision: CITY OF LONG BEACH Tract:
Legal: *TR=PARCEL MAP AS PER BK 147 P 94-95 OF PM*(EX OF BICYCLE TRAIL) LOT/SEC 1 Property Characteristics
Use: OFFICE BUILDING Year Built / Eff. : 1983 / 1983 # of Units: 92 Zoning: LBPD1 Lot Size Ac / Sq Ft: 2.5267 / 110064 Fireplace:
Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0.0 Heating:
# Rooms: 0 Quality: Style:
Pool: Air: Parking / #: BASEMENT
GARAGE /
Stories: 2.0 Garage Area : Basement Area:
Gross Area: 73076 Sq. Ft. : 73076
Sale and Loan Information
Sale / Rec Date: 12/01/2016 / 01/13/2017 *$/Sq. Ft.: $328.43 2nd Mtg.:
Sale Price: $24,000,000 1st Loan: $16,400,000 Prior Sale Amt: $160,000 Doc No.: 2017.56966 Loan Type: CONVENTIONAL Prior Sale
Date: 02/26/2009
Doc Type: GRANT DEED Transfer
Date: 01/13/2017 Prior Doc No.: 2009.354761
Seller: CONGRESSIONAL PARTNERS
LLC Lender: DEUTSCHE BK AG/NY BRANCH
Prior Doc
Type: DEED
*$/Sq. Ft. is a calculation of Sale Price divided by Sq. Feet.
Tax Information
Imp Value: $6,969,313 Exemption Type:
Land Value: $18,758,175 Tax Year / Area: 2021 / 05-500
Total Value: $25,727,488 Tax Value:
Total Tax Amt: $323,580.54 Improved: 27.09%
Property Profile 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Property Profile 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 2 (of 2)
©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Limitation of Liability for Informational Report
IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN INSURED PRODUCT OR SERVICE OR A REPRESENTATION OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY. IT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT OR PRELIMINARY REPORT, OR ANY FORM OF TITLE INSURANCE OR GUARANTY. THIS REPORT
IS ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANT THEREFOR, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT FIRST AMERICAN'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FIRST AMERICAN DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS
COMPLETE OR FREE FROM ERROR, AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, AS-IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS. AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, RECIPIENT AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN'S SOLE LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE
CAUSED BY AN ERROR OR OMISSION DUE TO INACCURATE INFORMATION OR NEGLIGENCE IN PREPARING THIS REPORT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE REPORT. RECIPIENT ACCEPTS THIS REPORT WITH THIS LIMITATION AND
AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED THIS REPORT BUT FOR THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE. FIRST AMERICAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE LEGALITY OR PROPRIETY OF RECIPIENT’S USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN.
Recorded Document
Recorded Document 10/27/2021
©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
The Recorded Document images are displayed in the subsequent pages for following request:
State
CA
County
LOS ANGELES
Document Number
2017.56966
Limitation of Liability for Informational Report
IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN INSURED PRODUCT OR SERVICE OR A REPRESENTATION OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY. IT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT OR PRELIMINARY REPORT, OR ANY FORM OF TITLE INSURANCE OR GUARANTY. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANT THEREFOR, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT FIRST AMERICAN'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FIRST AMERICAN DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION
HEREIN IS COMPLETE OR FREE FROM ERROR, AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, AS-IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS. AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, RECIPIENT
AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN'S SOLE LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE CAUSED BY AN ERROR OR OMISSION DUE TO INACCURATE INFORMATION OR NEGLIGENCE IN PREPARING THIS REPORT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE REPORT. RECIPIENT ACCEPTS
THIS REPORT WITH THIS LIMITATION AND AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED THIS REPORT BUT FOR THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE. FIRST AMERICAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE LEGALITY OR PROPRIETY OF RECIPIENT’S USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN.
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 1 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Transaction History
To request additional information, please contact your local Sales Representative, Customer Service Department, or for an additional fee you may click here .
History Record #1 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Valuerock Congressional Llc /
Valuerock Congressional Ii Llc
Seller: Congressional Partners Llc
Transaction Date: 12/01/2016 Sales Price: $24,000,000.00 Recording Date: 01/13/2017 Sales Price Type: FULL VALUE Recording Doc #: 2017.56966 Title Company: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE
Document Type: Deed Transfer
FINANCE
Mortgage Recording Date: 01/13/2017 Mortgage Transfer Type: Resale Mortgage Document #: 2017.56967 Mortgage Rate Type: ESTIMATED Lender: DEUTSCHE BK AG/NY
BRANCH
Mortgage Term:
Document Type: Trust Deed/Mortgage Mortgage Rate: 4.080 Loan Amount: $16,400,000.00 Borrower 2: VALUEROCK
CONGRESSIONAL II LLC
Borrower 1: VALUEROCK
CONGRESSIONAL LLC
Borrower 4:
Borrower 3:
History Record #2 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: COLTON FAMILY TRUST Seller: Colton David A
Transaction Date: 11/30/2016 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 01/13/2017 Sales Price Type: FULL VALUE Recording Doc #: 2017.56965 Title Company: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE NCS Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #3 FORECLOSURE
Recording Date: 09/26/2014 Document Type: Lis Pendens
Recording Doc #: 2014.1024638
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 2 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
History Record #4 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: COLTON FAMILY TRUST Seller: Bayazit Rezan S
Transaction Date: 07/02/2011 Sales Price: $130,000.00
Recording Date: 07/19/2011 Sales Price Type: PARTIAL
Recording Doc #: 2011.964047 Title Company:
Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #5 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: COLTON FAMILY TRUST Seller: Mohammad A & S Trust Transaction Date: 05/04/2011 Sales Price: $93,000.00
Recording Date: 06/01/2011 Sales Price Type: PARTIAL
Recording Doc #: 2011.757448 Title Company:
Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #6 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: CURTIS FAM PRINCIPLED
QTIP TRUST
Seller: Curtis Fam Principled Trust
Transaction Date: 02/24/2010 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 03/01/2011 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 2011.316598 Title Company: ATTORNEY ONLY Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #7 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: COLTON,DAVID A Seller: Jonson Family 1986 Trust
Transaction Date: 02/26/2009 Sales Price: $160,000.00
Recording Date: 03/12/2009 Sales Price Type: FULL VALUE Recording Doc #: 2009.354761 Title Company: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #8 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: CURTIS 2006 FAMILY TRUST Seller: Curtis Mary P
Transaction Date: 09/16/2008 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 10/27/2008 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 2008.1902664 Title Company: FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 3 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
FINANCE
Mortgage Recording Date: 10/27/2008 Mortgage Transfer Type: Sale Mortgage Document #: 2008.1902675 Mortgage Rate Type: VAR Lender: PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE
CO
Mortgage Term:
Document Type: Trust Deed/Mortgage Mortgage Rate:
Loan Amount: $6,900,000.00 Borrower 2:
Borrower 1: CURTIS 2006 FAMILY TRUST Borrower 4:
Borrower 3:
History Record #9 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: MOHAMMAD A & S TRUST Seller: Mohammad Aqeel
Transaction Date: 12/13/2006 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 02/26/2007 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 2007.408876 Title Company: ATTORNEY ONLY Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #10 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: COLTON FAMILY TRUST Seller: Glenn Sally J Living Trust Transaction Date: 12/22/2006 Sales Price: $175,000.00
Recording Date: 01/24/2007 Sales Price Type: FULL VALUE Recording Doc #: 2007.144330 Title Company:
Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #11 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: MOHAMMAD,AQEEL Seller: Khan Family Trust
Transaction Date: 08/04/2006 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 11/28/2006 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 2006.2622171 Title Company:
Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 4 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
History Record #12 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: MOORE,JOHN T & JANICE M
TRUSTEES
Seller:
Transaction Date: 07/11/2000 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 07/18/2000 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 2000.1098963 Title Company:
Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #13 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Khan Khurshid A / Khan
Mohammed A
Seller: Congressional Partners,
Transaction Date: 04/06/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/13/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.628899 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #14 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: KHAN,ISKANDAR Seller: Congrssional Partners,
Transaction Date: 04/06/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/13/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.628897 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #15 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Stanton Lloyd J / Stanton
Tamra L
Seller: Congressional,Prntrs
Transaction Date: 04/05/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/12/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.621360 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #16 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: JONSON TRUST Seller: Congressional Partners Llc
Transaction Date: 04/02/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/09/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.617844 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 5 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
History Record #17 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Curtis Douglas R / Curtis
Mary P
Seller: Congressional Partners,
Transaction Date: 03/30/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/06/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.583260 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #18 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: BRIGHAM-SWETLAND,KARSA
D
Seller: Congressional Partners,
Transaction Date: 03/30/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/06/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.583258 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #19 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: BRIGHAM-SWETLAND,KARSA
D
Seller: Swetland,G R
Transaction Date: 03/30/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/06/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.583257 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #20 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: BAYAZIT,REZAN S Seller: Congressional,Ptnrs
Transaction Date: 03/29/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/05/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.574802 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #21 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: HILLCREST INVESTORS LTD Seller: Congressional Partners Llc Transaction Date: 03/03/1999 Sales Price: $160,000.00
Recording Date: 03/10/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.398209 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 6 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
History Record #22 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Moore Janice M / Moore
John T
Seller: Congressional Partners Llc
Transaction Date: 03/02/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 03/09/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.389000 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #23 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: GLENN,SALLY J TRUSTEE Seller: Congressional Partners, Transaction Date: 01/15/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 01/22/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.99331 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #24 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: Bhushan Kul / Bhushan
Swaran L
Seller: Congressional Partners,
Transaction Date: 01/15/1999 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 01/22/1999 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1999.99329 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
History Record #25 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: CONGRESSIONAL PARTNERS
LLC
Seller: Congressional Place Partners
Transaction Date: 08/25/1998 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 09/01/1998 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1998.1567609 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 7 (of 8)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
FINANCE
Mortgage Recording Date: 09/01/1998 Mortgage Transfer Type: Resale Mortgage Document #: Mortgage Rate Type: FIX
Lender: CAPITAL CO AMERICA Mortgage Term:
Document Type: Trust Deed/Mortgage Mortgage Rate:
Loan Amount: $6,619,718.00 Borrower 2:
Borrower 1: CONGRESSIONAL PARTNERS
LLC
Borrower 4:
Borrower 3:
History Record #26 SALE/TRANSFER
Buyer: CONGRESSIONAL PL Seller: Great
Transaction Date: 04/19/1988 Sales Price:
Recording Date: 04/26/1988 Sales Price Type:
Recording Doc #: 1988.567428 Title Company: CHICAGO TITLE Document Type: Deed Transfer
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Transaction History 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA 90803
10/27/2021 Page 8 (of 8)
©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Limitation of Liability for Informational Report
IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN INSURED PRODUCT OR SERVICE OR A REPRESENTATION OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY. IT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT OR PRELIMINARY REPORT, OR ANY FORM OF TITLE INSURANCE OR GUARANTY. THIS REPORT
IS ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANT THEREFOR, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT FIRST AMERICAN'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FIRST AMERICAN DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS
COMPLETE OR FREE FROM ERROR, AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, AS-IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS. AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, RECIPIENT AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN'S SOLE LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE
CAUSED BY AN ERROR OR OMISSION DUE TO INACCURATE INFORMATION OR NEGLIGENCE IN PREPARING THIS REPORT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE REPORT. RECIPIENT ACCEPTS THIS REPORT WITH THIS LIMITATION AND
AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED THIS REPORT BUT FOR THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE. FIRST AMERICAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE LEGALITY OR PROPRIETY OF RECIPIENT’S USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN.
Tax Map 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA
90803
Tax Map 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA
90803
10/27/2021 Page 1 (of 2)
All information contained herein is subject to the Limitation of Liability for Informational Report set forth on the last page hereof. ©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Tax Map 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA
90803
Tax Map 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWY, LONG BEACH, CA
90803
10/27/2021 Page 2 (of 2)
©2005-2020 First American Financial Corporation and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Limitation of Liability for Informational Report
IMPORTANT – READ CAREFULLY: THIS REPORT IS NOT AN INSURED PRODUCT OR SERVICE OR A REPRESENTATION OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY. IT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT OR PRELIMINARY REPORT, OR ANY FORM OF TITLE INSURANCE OR GUARANTY. THIS REPORT
IS ISSUED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE APPLICANT THEREFOR, AND MAY NOT BE USED OR RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PERSON. THIS REPORT MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WITHOUT FIRST AMERICAN'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. FIRST AMERICAN DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS
COMPLETE OR FREE FROM ERROR, AND THE INFORMATION HEREIN IS PROVIDED WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, AS-IS, AND WITH ALL FAULTS. AS A MATERIAL PART OF THE CONSIDERATION GIVEN IN EXCHANGE FOR THE
ISSUANCE OF THIS REPORT, RECIPIENT AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN'S SOLE LIABILITY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE
CAUSED BY AN ERROR OR OMISSION DUE TO INACCURATE INFORMATION OR NEGLIGENCE IN PREPARING THIS REPORT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FEE CHARGED FOR THE REPORT. RECIPIENT ACCEPTS THIS REPORT WITH THIS LIMITATION AND
AGREES THAT FIRST AMERICAN WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUED THIS REPORT BUT FOR THE LIMITATION OF LIABILITY DESCRIBED ABOVE. FIRST AMERICAN MAKES NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO THE LEGALITY OR PROPRIETY OF RECIPIENT’S USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN.
Marina II
6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, CA 90803
Inquiry Number: 6729878.7
November 02, 2021
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
Environmental Data Resources Inc www.edrnet.com
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
The EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search Report provides results from a search of available current land title records for environmental cleanup liens and other activity and use limitations, such as engineering controls and institutional controls.
A network of professional, trained researchers, following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to:
• search for parcel information and/or legal description; • search for ownership information;
• research official land title documents recorded at jurisdictional agencies such as recorders' offices, registries of deeds, county clerks' offices, etc.;
• access a copy of the deed;
• search for environmental encumbering instrument(s) associated with the deed; • provide a copy of any environmental encumbrance(s) based upon a review of key words in the instrument(s) (title, parties involved, and description); and • provide a copy of the deed or cite documents reviewed.
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING
OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC.
BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER
CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
EDR Environmental Lien and AUL Search
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION _______________________________
ADDRESS
6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Marina II
Long Beach, CA 90803
ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN
Environmental Lien: Found ¨ Not Found ý
OTHER ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS (AULs)
AULs: Found ¨ Not Found ý
6729878.7 Page 1
RESEARCH SOURCE
Source 1:
LA Recorder
Los Angeles, CA
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Deed 1:
Type of Deed: deed
Title is vested in: ValueRock Congressional LLC ValueRock Congressiona Title received from: Congressional Partner LLC Kul Bhushan Swaran Lata Deed Dated 1/12/2017
Deed Recorded: 1/13/2017
Book: NA
Page: na
Volume: na
Instrument: na
Docket: NA
Land Record Comments:
Miscellaneous Comments:
Legal Description: See Exhibit
Legal Current Owner: ValueRock Congressional LLC ValueRock Congressional II LLC ValueRock Congressional
III LLC
Parcel # / Property Identifier: 7242-012-006
Comments: See Exhibit
Deed Exhibit 1
APPENDIX B
THE EDR RADIUS MAP™ REPORT WITH GEOCHECK®
FORM-LBB-KKT
The EDR Radius Map™ Report with GeoCheck®
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Marina II
6700 Pacific Coast Highway
Long Beach, CA 90803
Inquiry Number: 6729878.2s
November 02, 2021
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 9
Orphan Summary 691
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting Source Map A-17
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-18
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC6729878.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
COORDINATES
Latitude (North): 33.7529030 - 33˚ 45’ 10.45’’
Longitude (West): 118.1072670 - 118˚ 6’ 26.16’’
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11
UTM X (Meters): 397446.4
UTM Y (Meters): 3735116.0
Elevation: 16 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 11997954 LOS ALAMITOS, CA
Version Date: 2018
Southeast Map: 11997974 SEAL BEACH, CA
Version Date: 2018
Southwest Map: 12004793 LONG BEACH OE S, CA
Version Date: 2018
Northwest Map: 11997952 LONG BEACH, CA
Version Date: 2018
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140513
Source: USDA
6729878.2s Page 2
C38 PARADISE CLEANERS, S 6608 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C37 PARADISE CLEANERS 6608 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS, HAZNET, HWTS Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C36 PARADISE CLEANERS 6608 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C35 ADVANCED LOGIC LLC D 6608 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C34 PARADISE CLEANERS 6608 E PACIFIC COAST EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C33 MARTINIZING 929119 6608 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C32 PARADISE CLEANERS, C 6608 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS Lower 353, 0.067, NNW C31 HYUNSUNG INC DBA: PA 6608 PACIFIC COAST H DRYCLEANERS, HWTS Lower 316, 0.060, NNW B30 LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0221 MARINA DR UST Lower 212, 0.040, SSW B29 CITY OF LONG BEACH 221 MARINA DR UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 212, 0.040, SSW B28 GRATEFUL, REGISTRATI 223 MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 201, 0.038, SSW B27 USCG MOORINGS LONG B 223 MARINA DRIVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 201, 0.038, SSW B26 W.A. RASIC CONTRUCTI 225 N MARINA DR. RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 191, 0.036, SSW B25 M.O DION AND SONS IN 227 MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B24 UNOCAL #0023 227 MARINA DR N LUST, Cortese, CERS Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B23 LONG BEACH ALAMITOS 227 N MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B22 ALAMITOS BAY MARINE 227 MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B21 LONG BEACH ALAMITOS 227 N MARINA DR CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, NPDES, CIWQS, CERS, HWTS Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B20 ALAMITOS BAY PARTNER S/PCH N/MARINA DR W/ RCRA-SQG, LUST, HIST UST, CHMIRS, Cortese, HIST... Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B19 LONG BEACH ALAMITOS 227 MARINA DR UST Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B18 KEN S UNION OIL DOCK 227 MARINA DR EDR Hist Auto Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B17 ALAMITOS BAY MARINA 227 MARINA DR CERS HAZ WASTE, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST,... Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B16 ABM FUEL DOCK 227 NORTH MARINA DRI UST Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B15 SERVICE STATION-ALAM 227 N MARINA DR HIST UST Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B14 CITY OF LB ALAMITOS 0227 MARINA DR UST Lower 183, 0.035, SSW B13 CROFT SHELL MARINE 231 MARINA DR EDR Hist Auto Lower 165, 0.031, SSW B12 0233 MARINA DR UST Lower 159, 0.030, SSW
B11 LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0235 MARINA DR UST Lower 151, 0.029, SSW B10 CITY OF LONG BEACH 235 MARINA DR UST Lower 151, 0.029, SSW B9 CITY OF LONG BEACH 237 MARINA DR UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 144, 0.027, SSW B8 LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0237 MARINA DR UST Lower 144, 0.027, SSW A7 MILLER STAN SAIL BOA 245 MARINA DR EDR Hist Auto Lower 118, 0.022, SW A6 WEST MARINE 251 N MARINA DR CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, HWTS Lower 103, 0.020, SW A5 WEST MARINE 251 N MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 103, 0.020, SW Reg SEAL BEACH NAVAL WEA DOD Same 4491, 0.851, SE
A4 DIVERSIFIED EQUITY I 6700 E PACIFIC COAST HWTS TP
A3 6700 EAST PACIFIC CO CHMIRS TP
A2 6700 PACIFIC COAST H CHMIRS TP
A1 6700 EAST PACIFIC CO ERNS TP
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS 6729878.2s Page 3
J77 FORMER TOSCO - 76 ST 6280 2ND ST E LUST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 1953, 0.370, NW J76 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 6401 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA-SQG, LUST, HIST UST, FINDS, ECHO, Cortese,... Lower 1811, 0.343, NNW 75 EAVES SEAL BEACH 333 FIRST STREET ENVIROSTOR, VCP, DEED Lower 1345, 0.255, South H74 MARINA SMILES DENTIS 6437 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1316, 0.249, NNW H73 TRADER JOES 043 6451 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1278, 0.242, NNW H72 TRADER JOE’S #043 6451 E PACIFIC COAST CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Lower 1278, 0.242, NNW I71 JOHN COX 524 GALLEON WAY RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1256, 0.238, South I70 TRACY VALDEZ 530 GALLEON WAY RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1221, 0.231, South H69 PREFERRED COMMERCIAL 6475 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1211, 0.229, NNW H68 BLACK DOT COFFEE 6475 PACIFIC COAST H RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1211, 0.229, NNW H67 J’S CLEANERS & LAUND 6481 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS, CERS Lower 1194, 0.226, NNW H66 J’S CLEANERS & LAUND 6481 EAST PACIFIC CO CPS-SLIC Lower 1194, 0.226, NNW H65 J’S CLEANERS & LAUND 6481 PACIFIC COAST CPS-SLIC Lower 1194, 0.226, NNW H64 AMAZON.COM SERVICES 6420 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1185, 0.224, NNW H63 CITY DUMP & SALVAGE 6501 PACIFIC COAST H WMUDS/SWAT Lower 1135, 0.215, NNW G62 LA COUNTY FLOOD CONT SW WESTMINSTERAVE AN SWF/LF, CERS Lower 1083, 0.205, NW G61 CITY OF LONG BEACH 6610 MARINA DR SWEEPS UST Lower 1013, 0.192, NW G60 CITY OF LONG BEACH 6610 MARINA DR UST Lower 1013, 0.192, NW F59 ATHLETA 1759 6440 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 988, 0.187, NNW F58 SEPHORA INC #1250 6440 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 988, 0.187, NNW F57 SEPHORA #1250 6440 E PACIFIC COAST CERS HAZ WASTE Lower 988, 0.187, NNW F56 ATHLETA 1759 6440 E PACIFIC COAST CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS, HWTS Lower 988, 0.187, NNW E55 ELLIOT TENEYCK LTD 5491 MARINA WAY DR HIST UST, EMI Higher 916, 0.173, SW F54 ONE MEDICAL GROUP IN 6460 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 798, 0.151, NNW E53 DANIEL REINHARDT 205 N MARINA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 763, 0.145, SW E52 RICK HAUSMAN 205 N MARINA DR. RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 763, 0.145, SW E51 CITY OF LONG BEACH 207 MARINA DR UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 735, 0.139, SW E50 LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0207 MARINA DR UST Lower 735, 0.139, SW D49 HELLMAN PROPERTIES L 1 PACIFIC COAST HWY RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 573, 0.109, SSE D48 HELLMAN PROPERTIES L 1 PACIFIC COAST HWY CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Lower 573, 0.109, SSE D47 STATE LANDS COMMISSI PACIFIC COAST HWY LUST, CPS-SLIC, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 527, 0.100, SSE 46 CHEVRON - ALAMITOS B 6655 MARINA CPS-SLIC, CERS Lower 508, 0.096, NW 45 CITY DUMP & SALVAGE 6615, 6621, 6695 PAC SWF/LF, CERS Higher 451, 0.085, NE C44 PTJV-CA LP DBA THRIV 6500 PACIFIC COAST H RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 412, 0.078, NNW C43 LA CO FLOOD CONTROL 6502 E PACIFIC COAST SWF/LF Lower 358, 0.068, NNW C42 PETCO STORE #547 6500 E PACIFIC COAST CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, CERS, HWTS Lower 358, 0.068, NNW C41 PETCO STORE #547 6500 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 358, 0.068, NNW C40 MRS GOOCH’S NATURAL 6550 E PACIFIC COAST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 356, 0.067, NNW C39 PARADISE CLEANERS, J 6600 E PACIFIC COAST DRYCLEANERS Lower 354, 0.067, NNW
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS 6729878.2s Page 4
Q103 NAVAL WEAPONS STATIO 800 SEAL BEACH BLVD HAZNET, ICE, HWP, CERS, HWTS Higher 5144, 0.974, ESE Q102 NAVAL WEAPONS STATIO 800 SEAL BEACH BLVD. ENVIROSTOR Higher 5144, 0.974, ESE Q101 USNAVY NAVAL WEAPONS SEAL BEACH BLVD. SEMS, CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-LQG, FTTS, HIST... Higher 5144, 0.974, ESE P100 EPTC ALAMITOS PARCEL 692 NORTH STUDEBAKER ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 4936, 0.935, NNE P99 ALAMITOS STATION 692 N STUDEBAKER RD CERS HAZ WASTE, HAZNET, HWP, CERS, HWTS Lower 4936, 0.935, NNE P98 SCE-ALAMITOS 692 N STUDEBAKER ROA ENVIROSTOR, ICE, CERS Lower 4936, 0.935, NNE O97 NWS SEAL BCH ENVIROSTOR Higher 4650, 0.881, ESE
O96 NAVAL MUNITIONS DEPO ENVIROSTOR Higher 4650, 0.881, ESE O95 LONG BEACH AMMUNITIO ENVIROSTOR Higher 4650, 0.881, ESE 94 LOYNES BEACH PARTNER 400 N STUDEBAKER ROA ENVIROSTOR, DEED, CERS Lower 4634, 0.878, NNE O93 LONG BEACH AMMUNITIO FUDS Higher 4630, 0.877, ESE
92 SEAL BEACH CLEANERS 331 MAIN STREET ENVIROSTOR, DRYCLEANERS Lower 3220, 0.610, SSE N91 LA DEPARTMENT WATER 6801 E 2ND ST WESTMI HWP Lower 2940, 0.557, NE N90 LAWP,HAYNES GENERATI 6801 WESTMINSTER AVE Toxic Pits Lower 2901, 0.549, NE 89 SEAL BEACH MARINA PA 101 MARINA DR ENVIROSTOR, Orange Co. Industrial Site Lower 2708, 0.513, SSW 88 ALAMITOS BAY MAINT Y 6204 E 02ND ST LUST, UST, Cortese, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 2562, 0.485, WNW M87 MARINA SHIPYARD 6400 MARINA DR Cortese, HAZNET, HWTS Lower 2513, 0.476, NW M86 ANCHOR MARINE CANVAS 6400 E MARINA DRIVE LUST, CHMIRS, EMI, HIST CORTESE, NPDES, WDS Lower 2513, 0.476, NW L85 CITY DUMP SALVAGE #1 6363 PACIFIC COAST H SWF/LF Lower 2510, 0.475, NNW L84 BIXBY VILLAGE LANDFI 6363 PACIFIC COAST H WMUDS/SWAT, LDS Lower 2510, 0.475, NNW L83 CITY DUMP SALVAGE #3 6364 PACIFIC COAST H SWF/LF Lower 2505, 0.474, NW 82 LCW OIL OPERATIONS P 6433 E 2ND STREET SEMS Lower 2090, 0.396, North J81 DAVES MARINA CHEVRON 6301 WESTMINSTER AVE RCRA-SQG, LUST, FINDS, ECHO, HAZNET, HIST CORTESE,...Lower 2082, 0.394, NNW K80 ARCO #5084 490 HIST CORTESE Lower 2075, 0.393, SSE
J79 CHEVRON #9-0016 6301 WESTMINSTER AVE LUST, Cortese Lower 2046, 0.387, NNW K78 ARCO #6066 490 PACIFIC COAST LUST, CHMIRS, Orange Co. Industrial Site, Cortese,... Lower 2015, 0.382, South
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
6700 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION SITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 9 of the attached EDR Radius Map report:
Site Database(s) EPA ID
6700 EAST PACIFIC CO
6700 EAST PACIFIC CO
LONG BEACH, CA
ERNS N/A
NRC Report #: 1030509
Incident Date Time: 2012-11-13 08:13:00
6700 PACIFIC COAST H
6700 PACIFIC COAST H
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
CHMIRS N/A
OES Incident Number: 16-4553
6700 EAST PACIFIC CO
6700 EAST PACIFIC CO
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
CHMIRS N/A
OES Incident Number: 12-6865
DIVERSIFIED EQUITY I
6700 E PACIFIC COAST
LONG BEACH, CA 90803
HWTS N/A
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS Institutional Controls Sites List
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
RESPONSE State Response Sites
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY Recycler Database
HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory
IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register AOCONCERN Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County
HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database
SCH School Property Evaluation Program
CDL Clandestine Drug Labs
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
AQUEOUS FOAM Former Fire Training Facility Assessments Listing PFAS PFAS Contamination Site Location Listing
Local Land Records
LIENS Environmental Liens Listing
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing
MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing
SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan
CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List
EMI Emissions Inventory Data
ENF Enforcement Action Listing
Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data
ICE ICE
LOS ANGELES CO. HMS HMS: Street Number List
HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database
MINES Mines Site Location Listing
MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing
NPDES NPDES Permits Listing
PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing
PROC Certified Processors Database
Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records
LA Co. Site Mitigation Site Mitigation List
UIC UIC Listing
UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER)
WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing
WDS Waste Discharge System
WIP Well Investigation Program Case List
MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER)
PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER)
WDR Waste Discharge Requirements Listing
CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System
CERS CERS
NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER)
OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER)
PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER)
SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER)
WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
MINES MRDS Mineral Resources Data System
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE Methane Producing Landfills
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9
RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal CERCLIS list
SEMS: SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
A review of the SEMS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/29/2021 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LCW OIL OPERATIONS P 6433 E 2ND STREET N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.396 mi.) 82 317 Site ID: 0908768
EPA Id: CAN000908768
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity.
A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/13/2021 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ USNAVY NAVAL WEAPONS SEAL BEACH BLVD. ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.974 mi.) Q101 401
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/13/2021 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALAMITOS BAY PARTNER S/PCH N/MARINA DR W/ SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B20 60 EPA ID:: CAD982053266
USCG MOORINGS LONG B 223 MARINA DRIVE SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.038 mi.) B27 96 EPA ID:: CA3690390528
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites.
A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/22/2021 has revealed that there are 10 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LONG BEACH AMMUNITIO ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) O95 347
Facility Id: 80001028
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
NAVAL MUNITIONS DEPO ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) O96 348
Facility Id: 80000834
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
NWS SEAL BCH ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.881 mi.) O97 349
Facility Id: 80000662
Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation
NAVAL WEAPONS STATIO 800 SEAL BEACH BLVD. ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.974 mi.) Q102 569 Facility Id: 80001234
Status: Refer: SMBRP
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EAVES SEAL BEACH 333 FIRST STREET S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.255 mi.) 75 239
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11
Facility Id: 60000680
Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
SEAL BEACH MARINA PA 101 MARINA DR SSW 1/2 - 1 (0.513 mi.) 89 339 Facility Id: 30550002
Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency
SEAL BEACH CLEANERS 331 MAIN STREET SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.610 mi.) 92 341 Facility Id: 60002594
Status: Inactive - Action Required
LOYNES BEACH PARTNER 400 N STUDEBAKER ROA NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.878 mi.) 94 344 Facility Id: 60001986
Status: Active
SCE-ALAMITOS 692 N STUDEBAKER ROA NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.935 mi.) P98 350 Facility Id: 80001647
Status: Active
EPTC ALAMITOS PARCEL 692 NORTH STUDEBAKER NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.935 mi.) P100 399 Facility Id: 19130113
Status: Inactive - Action Required
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: The Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data come from the Integrated Waste Management Board’s Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database.
A review of the SWF/LF list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 5 SWF/LF sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY DUMP & SALVAGE 6615, 6621, 6695 PAC NE 0 - 1/8 (0.085 mi.) 45 151 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AK-5017
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: TBD (Pending Investigation)
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LA CO FLOOD CONTROL 6502 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.) C43 148 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AK-5025
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: TBD (Pending Investigation)
LA COUNTY FLOOD CONT SW WESTMINSTERAVE AN NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.205 mi.) G62 215 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AK-5008
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: Pre-regulation
CITY DUMP SALVAGE #3 6364 PACIFIC COAST H NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) L83 318 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AK-0008
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: TBD (Pending Investigation)
CITY DUMP SALVAGE #1 6363 PACIFIC COAST H NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.475 mi.) L85 321 Database: SWF/LF (SWIS), Date of Government Version: 05/10/2021 Facility ID: 19-AK-0006
Operational Status: Closed
Regulation Status: Pre-regulation
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 10 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALAMITOS BAY MAINT Y 6204 E 02ND ST WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.485 mi.) 88 335 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0603701726
Facility Id: 908030116
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603701726
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALAMITOS BAY PARTNER S/PCH N/MARINA DR W/ SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B20 60 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T10000004637
UNOCAL #0023 227 MARINA DR N SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B24 88 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0603701727
Facility Id: 908030125
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603701727
STATE LANDS COMMISSI PACIFIC COAST HWY SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.100 mi.) D47 154 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Global ID: T0605900594
Facility Status: Case Closed
EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 6401 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.343 mi.) J76 253 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Open - Remediation
Global ID: T0603701717
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13
Facility Id: 908030016
Status: Pollution Characterization
Global Id: T0603701717
FORMER TOSCO - 76 ST 6280 2ND ST E NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.370 mi.) J77 275 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Open - Remediation
Global ID: T0603701721
Facility Id: 908030052
Status: Remedial action (cleanup) Underway
Global Id: T0603701721
ARCO #6066 490 PACIFIC COAST S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) K78 292 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: ORANGE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 07/09/2021 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Open - Remediation
Global ID: T0605900372
Facility Id: 86UT206
Facility Status: Remediation Plan
Global Id: T0605900372
CHEVRON #9-0016 6301 WESTMINSTER AVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.387 mi.) J79 309 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Global ID: T0603701725
Facility Id: 908030098
Status: Case Closed
DAVES MARINA CHEVRON 6301 WESTMINSTER AVE NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.394 mi.) J81 311 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T0603701725
ANCHOR MARINE CANVAS 6400 E MARINA DRIVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.476 mi.) M86 322 Database: LUST REG 4, Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global ID: T0603701724
Facility Id: 908030089
Status: Case Closed
Global Id: T0603701724
CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater.
A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 CPS-SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHEVRON - ALAMITOS B 6655 MARINA NW 0 - 1/8 (0.096 mi.) 46 153 Database: SLIC REG 4, Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14
Facility Status: No further action required
Global Id: SLT4303129
STATE LANDS COMMISSI PACIFIC COAST HWY SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.100 mi.) D47 154 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: T0605900594
J’S CLEANERS & LAUND 6481 PACIFIC COAST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) H65 220 Database: SLIC REG 4, Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Facility Status: No further action required
J’S CLEANERS & LAUND 6481 EAST PACIFIC CO NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) H66 221 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed
Global Id: SL2044X1602
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database.
A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 13 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0237 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.027 mi.) B8 39 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 CITY OF LONG BEACH 237 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.027 mi.) B9 39 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 19-060-003120
CITY OF LONG BEACH 235 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.029 mi.) B10 40 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 19-060-003110
LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0235 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.029 mi.) B11 40 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Not reported 0233 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.030 mi.) B12 40 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 CITY OF LB ALAMITOS 0227 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B14 41 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 ABM FUEL DOCK 227 NORTH MARINA DRI SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B16 42 Database: LOS ANGELES UST, Date of Government Version: 04/19/2021 Database: UST CLOSURE, Date of Government Version: 05/20/2021 LONG BEACH ALAMITOS 227 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B19 59 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
CITY OF LONG BEACH 221 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.040 mi.) B29 102 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 19-060-003050
LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0221 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.040 mi.) B30 102 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LONG BEACH MARINE BU 0207 MARINA DR SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.139 mi.) E50 194 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 CITY OF LONG BEACH 207 MARINA DR SW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.139 mi.) E51 195 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 19-060-003030
CITY OF LONG BEACH 6610 MARINA DR NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.192 mi.) G60 214 Database: LONG BEACH UST, Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/03/2021
Facility Id: 19-060-003170
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs.
A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/22/2021 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EAVES SEAL BEACH 333 FIRST STREET S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.255 mi.) 75 239 Status: Certified O&M - Land Use Restrictions Only
Facility Id: 60000680
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
WMUDS/SWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System is used for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. The source is the State Water Resources Control Board.
A review of the WMUDS/SWAT list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2000 has revealed that there are 2 WMUDS/SWAT sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CITY DUMP & SALVAGE 6501 PACIFIC COAST H NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.215 mi.) H63 217 BIXBY VILLAGE LANDFI 6363 PACIFIC COAST H NNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.475 mi.) L84 319 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs.
A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/15/2021 has revealed that there
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC6729878.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16
are 8 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WEST MARINE 251 N MARINA DR SW 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.) A6 20 ALAMITOS BAY MARINA 227 MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B17 43 LONG BEACH ALAMITOS 227 N MARINA DR SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B21 72 PETCO STORE #547 6500 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.) C42 127 HELLMAN PROPERTIES L 1 PACIFIC COAST HWY SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.109 mi.) D48 156 ATHLETA 1759 6440 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.187 mi.) F56 204 SEPHORA #1250 6440 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.187 mi.) F57 207 TRADER JOE’S #043 6451 E PACIFIC COAST NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.242 mi.) H72 233 Toxic Pits: The Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites database identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board.
A review of the Toxic Pits list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/01/1995 has revealed that there is 1 Toxic Pits site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
Lower Elevation Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LAWP,HAYNES GENERATI 6801 WESTMINSTER AVE NE 1/2 - 1 (0.549 mi.) N90 340 Closure Date: 10/18/90
Task #: 84006
Status: CLOSED
Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks
SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list.