Attachment K - Compliance Checklist_PECC 03-23_Compiled part 1 — Long Beach City Council, September 19, 2023 (part 3 of 7)

d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
As discussed in the PEIR and summarized under “SEASP PEIR Summary,” the five landfills serving the SEASP have adequate capacity to serve SEASP buildout. The proposed project is within the buildout capacity of the SEASP; therefore, the project would be adequately served by existing landfills. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing solid waste, such as those listed under “SEASP PEIR Summary.” The proposed project would not affect Long Beach’s ability to continue to meet the required AB 939 waste diversion requirements. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of state and local standards or capacity. The proposed project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. In particular, the proposed project would be required to comply with LBMC provisions regulating solid waste, such as Chapter 18.67 (Construction and Demolition Recycling Program), Chapter 18.67.100 (Compliance with CALGreen Recycling Requirements), Chapter 8.6 (compliance with state and local requirements), Chapter 8.60 (organic waste processing), and the California Green Building Code. Impacts under this threshold were adequately addressed in the PEIR. The proposed project is consistent with and would be within the scope of the PEIR. Effects peculiar to the proposed project or the project site do not exist. No new information would result in more severe impacts. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met. No subsequent review is required.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

3. Environmental Analysis
July 2023 Page 189

3.20 WILDFIRE
Issues

SEASP PEIR
Determination
Are there
environmental
effects peculiar to
the project or the
parcel on which
the project would
be located?
Are there
environmental
effects that were
not analyzed as
significant effects
in the SEASP
PEIR?
Are there
potentially
significant offsite impacts and
cumulative
impacts which
were not
discussed in the
SEASP PEIR?
Are there
previously
identified
significant effects
which, as a result
of substantial
new
information which
was not known at
the time the
SEASP PEIR was
certified, are
determined to
have a more
severe adverse
impact than
discussed in the
SEASP PEIR?
XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
See discussion
below. no yes no no
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
See discussion
below. no yes no no
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
See discussion
below. no yes no no
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
See discussion
below. no yes no no

SEASP PEIR SUMMARY
The Wildfire topic was added to the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist in 2019 after the certification of the SEASP EIR. While Wildfire was not addressed as an independent topic, hazards related to wildland fire were addressed in Chapter 5.8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, under Impact 5.8-6. The PEIR determined that the SEASP area is highly urbanized and built out and is outside of wildfire hazard severity zones designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The nearest high severity zones are in Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, and Palos Verdes Estates, approximately 13 miles west of the SEASP area. Future development consistent with the SEASP would not pose wildfire-related hazards to people or structures.

Therefore, no impact would occur.

Further emergency response was evaluated in Chapter 5.8 under Impact 5.8-5 and Chapter 5.16, Transportation, under Impact 5.8-5. The PEIR determined that implementation of the SEASP would not physically interfere M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

3. Environmental Analysis

Page 190 ends

with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and it would not result in inadequate emergency access.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Similar to the PEIR, the project site is in a highly urbanized area and is not within a fire hazard severity zone.

The nearest high severity zones are Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, and Palos Verdes Estate, approximately 13 miles west of the SEASP area and project site (CalFire 2023). Additionally, the project site is not located in an area designated as a fire threat by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC 2023).

This analysis addresses the thresholds regarding wildfire related impacts pursuant to the updated CEQA Guidelines.

DISCUSSION
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? The project site is not in or near SRA or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, and therefore does not meet the standard for further review under CEQA, and no impact would occur in this regard. The proposed project, a mixed-use project in a heavily urbanized area, would not exacerbate the threat of wildfire in the City or surrounding area. The proposed project would be required to be constructed to meet the City’s Fire Code (LBMC Title 18, Long Beach Building Standards Code, Chapter 18.48, Fire Code), which adopts and incorporates by reference the California Fire Code with certain amendments. The City’s Fire Code regulates the permit processes, emergency access, fire protection systems, such as sprinkler systems and fire alarms, among others. Wildfire, and fire-related impacts in general, would be consistent with the conclusions in the PEIR and remain less than significant.

Effects peculiar to the proposed project or the project site do not exist. No new information would result in more severe impacts. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the criteria for requiring further CEQA review are not met. No subsequent review is required.

July 2023 Page 191

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
Table 16, Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project, summarizes the mitigation measures discussed in Section 3, Environmental Analysis, that are applicable to the proposed project.

Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
AQ-1 Applicants for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall require the construction contractor to use equipment that meets the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tier 4 emissions standards for off-road diesel-powered construction equipment with more than 50 horsepower, unless it can be demonstrated to the City of Long Beach that such equipment is not available. Any emissions control device used by the contractor shall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level 4 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine, as defined by the California Air Resources Board’s regulations.

Prior to construction, the project engineer shall ensure that all demolition and grading plans clearly show the requirement for EPA Tier 4 or higher emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower. During construction, the construction contractor shall maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the construction site for verification by the City of Long Beach. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and numbers of construction equipment onsite. Equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Construction contractors shall also ensure that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board’s Rule 2449.

AQ-2 Applicants for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall require the construction contractor to prepare a dust control plan and implement the following measures during ground-disturbing activities—in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control under South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403—to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. The City of Long Beach shall verify that these measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. • Following all grading activities, the construction contractor shall reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall sweep streets with SCAQMD Rule 1186–compliant, PM10-efficient vacuum units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. • During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and shall tarp materials with a fabric cover or other cover that achieves the same amount of protection. • During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of every three hours on the construction site and a minimum of three times per day.
• During all construction activities, the construction contractor shall limit onsite vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles per hour. • Heavy construction vehicles trips shall be limited to off-peak hours.

AQ-3 Applicants for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall require the construction contractor to use coatings and solvents with a volatile organic compound (VOC) content lower than required under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 (i.e., super compliant paints). The construction contractor shall also use M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures

Page 192 ends

Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
precoated/natural-colored building materials, where feasible. Use of low-VOC paints and spray method shall be included as a note on architectural building plans and verified by the City of Long Beach during construction.

AQ-4 Prior to issuance of a building permit for new development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the property owner/developer shall show on the building plans that all major appliances (dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers) to be provided/installed are Energy Star appliances and electricity service initially enrolled for the development be sourced from 100 percent renewable sources, such as Southern California Edison’s Green Rate. Installation of Energy Star appliances and enrollment in an applicable electricity service shall be verified by the City of Long Beach prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

In addition, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the property owner/developer shall demonstrate to the City that tenant and landscaping contracts prohibit the use of gasoline-powered equipment, including lawn and garden equipment and outdoor power equipment. As part of the tenant contracts, the property owner/developer shall provide educational materials regarding the South Coast AQMD Electric Lawn and Garden Equipment Incentive and Exchange Program, Commercial Lawn & Garden Battery Buy-Down Rebate Program, and Residential Lawn Mower Rebate Program as well as the new requirement of AB 1346.

AQ-5 Prior to issuance of building permits for residential development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the property owner/developer shall indicate on the building plans that the following features have been incorporated into the design of the building(s). Proper installation of these features shall be verified by the City of Long Beach prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
• For multifamily dwellings, electric vehicle charging shall be provided as specified in Section A4.106.8.2 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and the Long Beach Municipal Code.
• Bicycle parking shall be provided as specified in Section A4.106.9 (Residential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.

AQ-6 Prior to issuance of building permits for nonresidential development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the property owner/developer shall indicate on the building plans that the following features have been incorporated into the design of the building(s). Proper installation of these features shall be verified by the City of Long Beach prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
• For buildings with more than ten tenant-occupants, changing/shower facilities shall be provided as specified in Section A5.106.4.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.
• Preferential parking for low-emitting, fuel-efficient, and carpool/van vehicles shall be provided as specified in Section A5.106.5.1 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code.
• Facilities shall be installed to support future electric vehicle charging and electric vehicle infrastructure to comply with Section A5.106.5.3 (Nonresidential Voluntary Measures) of the CALGreen Code and the Long Beach Municipal Code.

BIO-1 Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a biological resources report conducted by a qualified biologist. The biological resources report shall include: analysis of available literature and databases (CNDDB); historical sensitive biological resources; review of current land use and land ownership within the project vicinity; on-site survey and mapping that delineates vegetation communities present within the development area; identification of jurisdictional waters and special status habitat, wildlife, and plant species. Focused surveys for sensitive, threatened, endangered species, will also be prepared, as required. The project applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development and project design avoids impacts to special status species and habitats, in consultation with CDFW and USFWS. If complete avoidance is not possible, the project applicant shall obtain necessary permits from CDFW and USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall submit plans, required permits, and mitigation plans (if needed) to the Long Beach Development Services Department for review and approval.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
July 2023 Page 193
Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
BIO-2 Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a jurisdictional delineation prepared by a qualified biologist or letters stating that no such jurisdictional features exist. The jurisdictional delineation shall be prepared pursuant to the requirements of (1) US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, (2) CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, (3) RWQCB jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and Section 13260 of the Porter-Cologne Act, and (4) wetlands as defined under the California Coastal Act. The project shall be designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. If wetland avoidance is not possible, the applicant shall ensure no net loss of wetlands either by creation of applicant-sponsored wetlands or purchase of mitigation bank credits in consultation with applicable Federal- and State- agencies (Corps, CDFW, RWQB, and/or Coastal Commission). Any mitigation, replacement, and/or restoration of habitat shall occur in the LCWC or in an approved coastal mitigation bank that covers this area. If the applicant can demonstrate that there are no logistically viable opportunities for mitigation within the LCWC, the applicant may propose mitigation elsewhere, which must be approved by the City and the resource agencies. The mitigation plan prepared in consultation with the applicable agencies shall include:
responsibilities and of persons to supervise and implement the plan, site selection, restoration and creation of habitat; site preparation and planting implementation, schedule, maintenance guidelines, monitoring plan (5 year minimum), and long-term preservation. Prior to the issuance of grading permits covering jurisdictional areas, the project applicant shall provide evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that (1) all necessary permits or authorizations have been obtained from the Corps (pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), CDFW (pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, and RWQCB (pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act), the Coastal Commission, or that no such permits are required; and (2) the detailed mitigation and restoration plan shall be approved by the Development Services Department.

BIO-3 If sensitive biological resources are identified within or adjacent to the proposed development area, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that a qualified biologist has been retained to prepare a construction management plan. The construction limits shall be clearly flagged and/or fenced. No construction access, parking, storage of equipment, or waste dirt or rubble will be permitted within such marked areas. A monitoring biologist shall be onsite during any grading activities. The qualified biologist shall also develop and implement a project specific contractor training program to educate project contractors on the sensitive biological resources within and adjacent to the proposed development project area and oversee measures to avoid and/or minimize impacts to these species.

BIO-4 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any development, the project applicant shall include noise reduction measures to reduce noise impacts to wildlife. A note shall be provided on development plans indicating that throughout grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise:
• During all excavation and grading on-site, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards.
• The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors (wildlife) nearest the project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors (wildlife) during all project construction.
• No construction shall occur within 500 feet of nesting raptors or threatened or endangered species and 100 feet of all other nesting birds protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

BIO-5 Prior to approval of any development adjacent to jurisdictional waters or habitat for special status species and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 foot-candle at the edge of the habitat. This would ensure that spill light does not result in exposure of artificial light at levels exceeding the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.5 foot-candle).

BIO-7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant and/or subsequent builder shall prepare an urban-open space interface brochure to be approved by the Long Beach Development Services Department to educate residents on the responsibilities associated with living near sensitive biological habitat. The brochure shall address relevant issues, M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures

Page 194 ends

Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants. The approved brochure, along with attachments, shall be included as part of the rental/lease agreements and as part of the sales literature for future developments.

BIO-8 If construction is proposed between January through September, a qualified biologist must conduct a nesting bird survey(s) at least 30 days prior to commencement of construction with a follow-up survey no more than three days prior to initiation of construction activities to document the presence or absence of nesting birds in or adjacent to the project site. The preconstruction survey(s) will focus on identifying any raptors and owls, any species listed pursuant to the federal or California Endangered Species Act, California bird species of special concern, or a wading bird (herons or egrets), and/or passerines nests that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction activities. Any nest permanently vacated for the season would not warrant protection pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If active nests are documented, the following measures are required:
• Species-specific measures shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented to prevent abandonment of the active nest. At a minimum, grading in the vicinity of a nest shall be postponed until the young birds have fledged. A minimum exclusion buffer of 100 feet shall be maintained during construction, depending on the species and location. The perimeter of the nest setback zone shall be fenced or adequately demarcated with stakes and flagging at 20-foot intervals, and construction personnel and activities are restricted from the area.
• Vegetation clearing shall be conducted outside of the nesting season. If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to any disturbance of the site, including vegetation clearing, demolition activities, and grading. If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.
• For active nest of any species listed pursuant to the federal or California Endangered Species Act, California bird species of special concern, wading bird (herons or egrets), or owls or raptors, construction activities within 300 feet (500 feet from any owl or raptor nests) shall not exceed noise levels of 65 dB peak until the nest(s) is naturally vacated and juveniles have fledged and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The 65 dB peak noise levels may only be increased if a noise study demonstrates the ambient noise level is above 65 dB at the subject site, and shall not be allowed to exceed the ambient level. • A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying that no active nests are present, or that the young have fledged, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to initiation of grading in the nest-setback zone. The qualified biologist shall serve as a biological monitor during those periods when construction activities occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. • A final report of the findings, prepared by a qualified biologist, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to construction-related activities that have the potential to disturb any active nests during the nesting season.

CUL-1 Future development or redevelopment projects on or near buildings or structures 45 years of age or older shall require an intensive-level historical evaluation. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer shall prepare the evaluation in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines for evaluating historical resources. If, based on the evaluation of the property, it is determined that the proposed development or redevelopment project will have a substantial adverse effect on a historical resource (i.e., it would reduce its integrity to the point that it would no longer be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or in the list of Long Beach Landmarks), then the provisions of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 shall be implemented by the property owner or project applicant/developer to eliminate or reduce the project’s impact on historical resources.

CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, and for any subsequent permit involving excavation to increased depth, the project applicant for each development or redevelopment project considered for approval pursuant to the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall provide letters to the City of Long Beach from a qualified archaeologist and paleontologist (for excavations five feet below ground surface and deeper) who meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards. The letters shall state that the project applicant has retained these individuals, and that the archaeological consultant will be present during all grading in previously undisturbed areas and other significant ground-disturbing activities and that the paleontological consultant will be present during all grading that occurs below 5 feet from the ground surface. In the event archeological or paleontological resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities, the professional archeological or paleontological monitor shall have the authority to halt any activities adversely impacting potentially significant M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
July 2023 Page 195
Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
cultural resources until they can be formally evaluated. Suspension of ground disturbances in the vicinity of the discoveries shall not be lifted until the archaeological and/or paleontological monitor, in coordination with the construction contractor, has evaluated discoveries to assess whether they are significant cultural resources, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If significance criteria are met, then the project shall be required to perform data recovery, professional identification, radiocarbon dates as applicable, and other special studies. The resources shall be offered for curation or preservation to a repository with a retrievable collection system and an educational and research interest in the materials, such as the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History or California State University, Fullerton, or other local museum or repository. If no museum or repository is willing to accept the resource, the resource shall be considered the property of the City and may be stored, disposed of, transferred, exchanged, or otherwise handled by the City at its discretion.

CUL-4 At least 30 days prior to ground disturbance by each project development or redevelopment in conformance with the Specific Plan, the City of Long Beach would notify the three Native American tribal representatives who requested Native American monitoring of ground disturbing activities (Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians Kizh Nation, Gabrieleño/Tongva Band of Mission Indians, and Juaneño Band of Mission Indians Acjachemen Nation). For each project, the project applicant would retain one certified Native American monitor who would accompany the professional archaeological monitor during on-call monitoring. The Native American monitor would have the same authority to halt activities that could adversely impact archaeological or tribal cultural resources that the professional archaeological monitor would. The Native American monitor would recommend measures to avoid, preserve, and/or recover Native American archaeological and/or tribal cultural resources, as practicable, and would convey such resources to the pertinent tribe or most likely descendant, as applicable.

CUL-6 If human remains are encountered during construction excavation and grading activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that no further disturbance shall occur until the county coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition, pursuant to Public Resources Section 5097.98. If the remains are determined to be of Native American descent, the coroner has 24 hours to notify the NAHC. The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the most likely descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Preservation of the remains in place or project design alternatives shall be considered.

HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for individual development projects within the Southeast Area Specific Plan, the project applicant/developer shall submit an updated version of the Phase I ESA to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department to identify environmental conditions of the development site and determine whether contamination is present. The updated Phase I ESA shall be prepared by an Environmental Professional in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E 1527.21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. If recognized environmental conditions related to soils or groundwater are identified in the updated Phase I ESA, the project applicant shall perform soil and soil gas sampling, as required, as a part of a Phase II ESA. A screening human health risk assessment shall be performed on the Phase II ESA data to determine if soil and soil gas concentrations pose a significant health risk for future project occupants and construction workers. If contamination is found at significant levels, the project applicant shall remediate all contaminated soils and soil vapor with the oversight and in accordance with state and local agency requirements (California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Long Beach Fire Department, etc.). All contaminated soils and/or material encountered shall be disposed of at a regulated site and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations prior to the completion of grading. Applicable soil and soil vapor remediation efforts shall occur prior to the issuance of building permits. If soil vapor with elevated concentrations of VOCs or methane cannot be sufficiently removed below regulatory screening levels, the applicant shall retain a qualified environmental professional to identify long-term vapor mitigation measures based on the remaining extent of petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and methane concentrations, and all recommendations shall be followed.

The project applicant/developer shall obtain approval from the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the County Department of Health Services for the development of the proposed project on a former landfill. The project applicant/developer shall implement remediation efforts associated with the former landfill use identified by CIWMB and/or other applicable oversight agency, including the Regional Board and the 2023 Workplan.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures

Page 196 ends

Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a report documenting the completion, results, and any follow-up remediation on the recommendations, if any, shall be provided to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department evidencing that all site remediation activities have been completed or that a vapor mitigation system is required to be incorporated into building plans and that all contaminants identified by the screening human health risk assessment in soil and soil vapor would be below human health risk thresholds, and any methane mitigation is prepared according to Long Beach Municipal Code standards. Further, Approval from CIWMB and other applicable oversight agencies related to the former landfill use shall be submitted to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits demonstrating that the project site can be developed with residential and commercial uses with no risk to public health and safety.

HAZ-2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare a soil management plan (SMP) to ensure safe and appropriate handling, transportation, offsite disposal, reporting, oversight, and protocols used during construction to protect the health and safety of workers and future residents. The SMP shall be submitted to the City Department of Development Services prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan shall establish methodology and procedures to perform additional testing during grading if unknown hazardous materials are encountered and prior to grading for the soil stockpile. If additional soil is encountered during grading activities that is suspected of being impacted by hazardous materials, work at the subject construction activity area shall be halted until the appropriate evaluation and follow-up remedial measures are implemented in accordance with the soil management plan so that the area is suitable for grading activities to resume. The results of the evaluation shall be submitted to the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), or the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) or other applicable oversight agency, as appropriate, and the necessary response/remedial measures shall be implemented— as directed by DTSC, RWQCB, or other applicable oversight agency—until all specified requirements of the oversight agencies are satisfied and a no further action status is attained.

HAZ-3 Prior to the issuance of demolition permits for any buildings or structures, the project applicant/developer shall conduct the following inspections and assessments for all buildings and structures onsite and shall provide the City of Long Beach Development Services Department with a copy of the report of each investigation or assessment. • The project applicant shall retain a California Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) to perform abatement project planning, monitoring (including air monitoring), oversight, and reporting of all asbestos-containing materials (ACM) encountered. The abatement, containment, and disposal of all ACM shall be conducted in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 1403 and California Code of Regulation Title 8, Section 1529 (Asbestos). • The project applicant shall retain a licensed or certified lead inspector/assessor to conduct the abatement, containment, and disposal of all lead waste encountered. The contracted lead inspector/assessor shall be certified by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). All lead abatement shall be performed by a CDPH-certified lead supervisor or a CDPH-certified worker under the direct supervision of a lead supervisor certified by CDPH. The abatement, containment, and disposal of all lead waste encountered shall be conducted in accordance with the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rule 29; CFR Part 1926; and California Code of Regulation, Title 8, Section 1532.1 (Lead).
• Evidence of the contracted professionals attained by the project applicant shall be provided to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department. Additionally, contractors performing ACM and lead waste removal shall provide evidence of abatement activities to the City of Long Beach Building and Safety Bureau.

HYD-2 Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any development or redevelopment projects pursuant to the Southeast Area Specific Plan, project applicants/developers of such projects shall prepare a site-specific hydrology and hydraulic study of the on-site and immediate offsite storm drain systems to determine capacity and integrity of the existing systems. The hydrology and hydraulic study shall be submitted to City of Long Beach Public Works Department for review and approval.

HYD-3 The project applicant/developer of each development or redevelopment project that would be accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan shall request the “allowable discharge rate” – which limits peak flow discharges as compared to existing conditions based on regional flood control constraints – from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, and shall comply with such discharge rate. Compliance with the “allowable discharge rate” shall be demonstrated in the hydrology and hydraulic study to be completed pursuant to Mitigation Measure HYD-2.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
July 2023 Page 197
Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
HYD-5 Upon submission of development applications for development projects in the tsunami inundation zone (as identified in the City’s Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan) the Development Services Department shall provide project applicants with tsunami awareness and preparedness materials.

HYD-6 Prior to certificate of occupancy, project applicants and developers shall demonstrate to the Development Services Department that lease agreements and disclosures provided to homeowners and tenants disclose that those parties would be in a tsunami inundation zone (as identified in the City’s Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan). This notification shall include tsunami awareness and preparedness materials as well as information outlining applicable evacuation plans and routes.

N-1 Prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits for development projects accommodated by the Southeast Area Specific Plan, a note shall be provided on development plans indicating that ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise:
• Construction activity is limited to the daytime hours between 7 am to 7 pm on Monday through Friday and 9 am to 6 pm on Saturday, as prescribed in the City’s municipal code. Construction is prohibited on Sundays.
• All internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. • Stationary equipment such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise-sensitive uses. • Stockpiling is located as far as feasible from nearby noise-sensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited to the haul routes established by the City of Long Beach.

N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for development projects requiring pile driving or blasting, the project applicant/developer shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. The maximum levels shall not exceed 0.2 inch/second, which is the level that can cause architectural damage for typical residential construction. The applicant/developer shall use an alternative to traditional pile driving, such as Vibro Stone Columns piling (VSC) or another technology that would produce comparable vibration levels as VSC to keep vibration levels below 0.2 in/sec PPV. Traditional pile driving can be used for piles that are at a distance from an existing offsite building where vibration levels would not exceed 0.2 in/sec PPV and 83 VdB.

TRAF-2 As part of the subsequent environmental review for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, a site-specific traffic study shall be prepared by the project applicant/developer to evaluate the project’s potential impacts on vehicle miles traveled consistent with the City of Long Beach Transportation Impact Analysis to provide safe and efficient onsite circulation and access. The traffic study shall be approved by the Public Works Department. Payment of fees, construction of improvements, and signal timing shall be implemented prior to issuance of a building permit.

TRAF-3 Prior to issuance of building permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall make fair-share payments to the City of Long Beach toward construction of the traffic improvements listed below. The following traffic improvements and facilities are necessary to mitigate impacts of the SEASP and shall be included in the City’s fee mechanism(s):

Existing With Project Improvements
Studebaker Road & SR-22 Westbound Ramps: Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and fair-share contributions from area developments.

3. Studebaker Road & SR-22 Westbound Ramps: Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures

Page 198 ends

Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and fair-share contributions from area developments. Alternatively, the intersection could remain signalized with the following improvements:
o Modify the westbound approach from two left turn lanes and one right turn lane, to three left turn lanes and one right turn lane. o Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane and one through lane, to one left turn lane and three through lanes. o Optimize the AM and PM signal cycle lengths and splits. • 17. Shopkeeper Road & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:
o Modify the northbound approach from one shared through-left turn lane and one right turn lane, to one shared through-left turn lane and two right turn lanes. o Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane.
• 27. 2nd Street & Bay Shore Ave Avenue: This intersection would require the following improvements:
o Reconfigure the northbound approach to provide a dedicated left-turn lane, and a shared through/right-turn lane. o Add a southbound right-turn lane.
o Add an eastbound right-turn lane and restripe the shared through/right-turn lane as a through lane.

Cumulative Year (2035) With Project Improvements

3. And 11. Studebaker Road & SR-22 West- and Eastbound Ramps: Construct a spiral striped roundabout with two circulating lanes, with a southbound slip (bypass) lane. The southbound approach would be striped with two through lanes and one shared through-left turn lane; the westbound approach would have two left turn lanes and one right turn slip lane; and the northbound approach would have two through lanes and one right turn slip lane. This measure would be funded through the City of Long Beach Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Alternatively, the intersection could remain signalized and with the following improvements:
o Modify the westbound approach from two left turn lanes and one right turn lane, to three left turn lanes and one right turn lane. o Modify the northbound approach from one through lane and one shared through-right turn lane, to two through lanes and one shared through-right turn lane. o Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane and one through lane, to one left turn lane and three through lanes. o Optimize the AM and PM signal cycle lengths and splits. • 15. Marina Drive & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:
o Modify the northbound approach from one left turn lane, one shared through-left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane.
o Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane, one shared through-left turn lane, and one right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane.
o Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane.
• 17. Shopkeeper Road & 2nd Street: This intersection would require the following improvements:
o Modify the westbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to two left turn lanes, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane.
o Modify the eastbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

4. Summary of Mitigation Measures
July 2023 Page 199
Table 16 Mitigation Measures from the Certified SEASP EIR that are Applicable to the Proposed Project Number Mitigation Measure
• 20. PCH & Studebaker Road: This intersection would require the following improvements:
o Modify the southbound approach from one left turn lane, two through lanes, one right turn lane, and one right turn lane, to one left turn lane, three through lanes, one right turn lane.
o Optimization of the PM signal cycle lengths and splits.

TRAF-4 Prior to issuance of building permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall make fair-share payments to the City of Seal Beach toward construction of the traffic improvement listed below. Fair-share payments shall occur through either: 1) an agreement between the developer and City of Seal Beach to pay fair share funding for the improvement or 2) payment to the City of Seal Beach traffic mitigation fee program that is based on nexus requirements contained in the Mitigation Fee Act (Govt. Code § 66000 et seq.) and 14 Cal. Code of Regs. § 15126.4(a)(4). The traffic mitigation fee program must include the intersection improvements identified below. If the City’s traffic fee program has not incorporated the intersections identified below at the time of building permits and the applicant has made reasonable efforts to contribute its fair share, then project applicants shall have no further obligation to comply with this mitigation measure. • 9. Seal Beach Boulevard & 2nd Street/Westminster Boulevard: Modify the northbound approach from having one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one shared through-right turn lane, to having one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. • 22. PCH & Seal Beach Boulevard: This intersection would require three through lanes on the northbound approach.

TRAF-5 Prior to issuance of grading permits for development projects that would be accommodated by the SEASP, project applicants/developers shall prepare a construction management plan.

The construction management plan shall be approved by the City of Long Beach Public Works Department. The construction management plan shall identify construction hours, truck routes, travel patterns for haul routes, staging and parking areas, staggered worker arrival times, and safety procedures for pedestrians and cyclists. The construction management plan shall prohibit the use of heavy construction vehicles during peak hours. The plan shall also require the construction contractor to implement the following measures during construction activities, which shall be discussed at the pre-grading conference/meeting:
• Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes and provide temporary traffic controls, such as a flag person, during all roadway improvement activities to maintain adequate access for emergency vehicles and personnel.
• Develop a traffic plan to minimize interference for emergency vehicles and personnel from demolition and construction activities (e.g., advanced public notice of demolition and construction activities).

July 2023 Page 200

5. References
Balfour Beatty Ground Engineering. Vibro Stone Columns – Technique Sheet. www.balfourbeatty.com/media/29501/vibro-stone-columns.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2023.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2023, April. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-quality-actceqa/updated-ceqa-guidelines.

California Air Pollution Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA). 2022, April. CalEEMod, California Emissions Estimator Model User Guide, Version 2022.1.1.12 https://www.caleemod.com/userguide.

California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022, August. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022- 08/CEC-400-2022-010_CMF.pdf.

California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022, January 24 (updated). Electric Utility Service Area California, 2020. https://cecgis-caenergy.opendata.arcgis.com/documents/CAEnergy: electric-utility-serviceareas/explore. ———. 2023, January 11 (accessed). Electricity Consumption by Planning Area. http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbyplan.aspx.

California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2023a, May 25 (accessed). California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/.
———. 2022c, May 25 (accessed). California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder. https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=18f7488c0a9d4d299f5 e9c33b312f312.
———. 2022c, May 25 (accessed). Well Finder.
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/-118.10346/33.75563/17.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire). 2023, May 25 (accessed). Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2023, May 25 (accessed). California State Scenic Highway System Map. https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/ index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa.

California Geological Survey (CGS). 2010. San Gabriel Valley P-C Region Showing MRZ-2 Areas and Active Mine Operations.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

5. References
July 2023 Page 201
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2023, May 25 (accessed). CPUC High Fire Threat District (HFTD). https://capuc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/ index.html?id=5bdb921d747a46929d9f00dbdb6d0fa2.

Carmel Partners Realty Investors, LLC. 2018, May. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Market Place Long Beach Office Park, 6615, 6621, and 6695 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California 90803, (Accessors Parcel Numbers: 7237-020-040, -041, and -050). (Appendix G).

Cogstone. 2023, June. Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Used Project, City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California (Appendix D).

Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 2023, May 24 (accessed). FCC National Broadband Map. https://broadbandmap.fcc.gov/locationsummary/mobile?version=jun2022&location_id=1361201542&addr1=6615+E+PACIFIC+COAST +HWY&addr2=LONG+BEACH%2C+CA+90803&zoom=15.59&vlon=-
118.107406&vlat=33.755038&env=0&tech=tech4g.

Federal Highway Administration. 2006, August. Construction Noise Handbook.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006, January. FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) User’s Guide.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA). 2018, September. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment.

Fehr & Peers. 2023, June 26. Memorandum: 6615 Pacific Coast Highway Transportation Consistency Findings with the SEASP PEIR. (Appendix J).

Fuscoe Engineering (Fuscoe). 2022a, August 1. Long Beach Marketplace – LID Feasibility Screening. (Appendix F).
———. 2022b, September. Sewer Area Study, 6615 Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach. (Appendix K).

Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA). 2023, June 28. Biological Technical Report, (Appendix C).

Group Delta. 2022, September 2022. Geotechnical Investigation Report, Proposed Long Beach Marketplace Project. (Appendix E).

Long Beach, City of. 2017a, September. Southeast Area Specific Plan 2060. ———. 2017b, August. Southeast Area Specific Plan EIR. State Clearinghouse No. 2015101075. ———. 2017c, February 28. Hazard Mitigation Plan.
______. 2020, June. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

5. References

Page 202 ends

______. 2022a, August. Long Beach Climate Action Plan (CAP), https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/lbds/media-library/documents/planning/lb-cap/adoptedlb-cap_-aug-2022, accessed November 17, 2022. ———. 2022b, Long Beach Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, Appendix D: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Consistency Review Checklist and Technical Support Documentation, https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/lbds/medialibrary/documents/planning/environmental/environmental-reports/pending/climate-action-andadaptation-plan-and-safety-element-update/appendix-d---caap-checklist-and-technical-supportdocumentation, accessed January 6, 2023. ———. 2023a, May 25 (accessed). Interactive Bike Map: Go Active LB. https://longbeach.gov/goactivelb/resources/interactive-bike-map. ———. 2023b, June 5 (accessed). Natural Gas Utility. https://www.longbeach.gov/energyresources/aboutus/natural-gas/.

Long Beach Energy Resources. 2023, February 2. Will Serve Letter for New Development at 6615 E PCH (2nd and PCH). (Appendix M)
Long Beach Parks, Recreation And Marine (LBPRM). 2022, January. Long Beach Parks, Recreation & Marine Department Parks Make Long Beach: Strategic Plan for 2022-2032. https://www.longbeach.gov/globalassets/park/media-library/documents/businessoperations/about/strategic-business-plan/final-prm-strategic-plan-01.

Long Beach Parks, Recreation And Marine (LBPRM). 2023, May 25 (accessed). About The Department. https://www.longbeach.gov/park/business-operations/about.

Long Beach Water Department (LBWD). 2020. Urban Water Management Plan. Source:
https://lbwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Long-Beach-Water-Department-2020-UrbanWater-Management-Plan.pdf. ———. 2022, October 5. Will Serve Letter for 6615 E Pacific Coast Highway. (Appendix L).

Los Angeles County. Office of the Assessor. 2023 (accessed). Property Assessment Information System. https://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/m/.

Moffatt and Nichol. 2023, June. Long Beach Marketplace, Sea Level Rise Analysis. (Appendix H).

New Zealand Transport Agency. 2012. Ground Vibration from Road Construction.

Orange County. 2020, December 23. Approval of Addendum No. 6 to Final EIR No. 588 (SCH #2004011055) Regional Landfill Options for Orange County (RELOOC) Strategic Plan Olinda Alpha Landfill Implementation -Revision to Solid Waste Facility Permit to Update Landfill Closure Date (OC Waste & Recycling CEQA Log #634).

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

5. References
July 2023 Page 203
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020, September 3. Connect SoCal (2020–2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy). https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan -adopted-final-plan.

Southern California Edison (SCE). 2022a. 2021 Power Content Label. https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/custom-files/Web%20files/2021%20Power%20Conten t%20Label.pdf.
———. 2022b, November 7. Will Serve Letter. (Appendix N) South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD). 2005, May. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/ default-source/planning/air-quality-guidance/complete-guidance-document.pdf. ———. 2022, December 2. Final 2022 Air Quality Management Plan. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022-air-quality-management-plan/final-2022- aqmp/final-2022-aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=10.

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2023a, May 25 (accessed). National Inventory of Dams:

Whittier Narrows Dam. https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/#/dams/system/CA10027/risk ———. 2023b, May 25 (accessed). National Inventory of Dams, Whittier Narrows Dam Interactive Map:

MH Breach 241.3 ft. https://nid.sec.usace.army.mil/viewer/ ———. 2023c, May 25 (accessed). Whittier Narrows Dam Safety Modification Project. https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Dam-Safety-Program/Whittier-NarrowsDam-Safety-Modification-Project/ United States Green Building Council (USGBC). 2008. Building Area per Employee by Business Type.

M A R K E T P L A C E M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T A T 6 6 1 5 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

5. References

Page 204 ends

This page intentionally left blank.

July 2023 Page 205

6. List of Preparers

CITY OF LONG BEACH (LEAD AGENCY)
Maryanne Cronin, Planner

PLACEWORKS
Addie Farrell, Principal in Charge
Mariana Zimmermann, Project Manager
Emma Haines, Associate
Julia Lok, Project Planner
Nicole Vermilion, Principal AQ/GHG
Lance Park, Senior Associate AQ/GHG
Emily Parks, Project Planner AQ/GHG
Gina Froelich, Senior Editor
Cary Nakama, Graphics Specialist

CP VI MARKETPLACE, LLC (APPLICANT)
Hunter Weaver
6 7 0 0 E . P A C I F I C C O A S T H I G H W A Y M I X E D - U S E P R O J E C T

C I T Y O F L O N G B E A C H

6. List of Preparers

Page 206 ends

This page intentionally left blank.

MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
July 2023
Appendix A MMRP
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

#
$%&'()
*+,-.+,/012+30
456789:8;<=>?@A

$'(B )!
C)&D

$EFG HFIJ'$(&HK'$$!$L

!(&
M&J&K
CN&$O&J!(&M&C'N&$FHK'$$!$%&'
PPPQRL(&'$%
K&J'IFS)TK

#
$%&'()F 'K!

$!'UV
SWRS
RWVV
)!
C)&RD

$EXK
$Y&'()R
J
*+,-.+,/0Z[30
\]?@>^8_`a

$'(Bb!(
K&c
&FdeF
(!'&H!$(!C'K
Pc'()HK'(&FO!&
O'$'$'F 'K!

$!'U

fRUWWRU
!$

XCK'(&g
hR(
N gggRCK'(&g
hR(
N
0

!"!#$%&'( )*"+,

-./0123 456.
78 9:;<=>?@;9=:8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888887 ABA CDECFGHFIJKLKMNLKFOJFOKLFEKOMNOPEHCFELKOMCEFMENJBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBA ABQ CEFRHSLGDJJNETBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBQ ABU CEFRHSLVFSNLKFOBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW ABW JKLKMNLKFOJFOKLFEKOMCEFMENJFEMNOKXNLKFOBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW
Y5Z[. 456.
L\]^_A`AGabcd_\ecNf_\Gg_hijihC^\kV\klDe_Gbmm\fnBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBU L\]^_A`QSako_kciak\^XakikpNf_\BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBW L\]^_A`U Jicip\ciakJakicafikp\klE_gafcikpE_qbif_m_kceBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBr

!"#$$ %!&#'()*+
,-$+.!"#$/0#/0$(/!%%1%#203%!/*4

!"#$#%&$#
'"
'#$

#'%&'(

$#'%

%
&"
)*+,-+.+/0.+12-12+.13+2/02456713.+2/831/309:--58;*0,<66246=6>1764.1731=+460=6*+?>6.1 912+.139+.+/0.+12960,@36,024?124+.+12,1A07731=0>1@.>+264+2.*6B+20>C2=+312962.0>D970?.56713.E )*6--58*0,<66273670364+2?12A13902?6F+.*G6?.+12HIJKIEL1A.*68@<>+?56,1@3?6,M146024M+.N 1AO12/P60?*912+.13+2/36Q@+36962.,EG6?.+12HIJKIEL,.0.6,R :0;S*6290T+2/.*6A+24+2/,36Q@+364<N7030/307*:I;1A,@<4+=+,+12,@<,6?.+12:0;1A G6?.+12HIJKI13F*620417.+2/09+.+/0.6426/0.+=646?>030.+127@3,@02..17030/307*:H; 1A,@<4+=+,+12:?;1AG6?.+12HIJKJU.*6A1>>1F+2/36Q@+36962.,,*0>>077>NR :I;)*67@<>+?0/62?N,*0>>0417.036713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309A13.*6?*02/6, 9046.1.*6731V6?.13?124+.+12,1A731V6?.07731=0>U0417.64+213463.19+.+/0.613 0=1+4,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*662=+312962.E)*636713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309,*0>> <646,+/264.162,@36?197>+02?64@3+2/731V6?.+97>6962.0.+12EB13.*1,6?*02/6, F*+?**0=6<66236Q@+36413+2?137130.64+2.1.*6731V6?.0..*636Q@6,.1A0 36,712,+<>60/62?N1307@<>+?0/62?N*0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+12<N>0F1=6320.@30>36,1@3?6, 0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U.*0.0/62?N,*0>>U+A,136Q@6,.64<N.*6>6040/62?N130 36,712,+<>60/62?NU7367036024,@<9+.073171,6436713.+2/13912+.13+2/731/309E :H;)*6>6040/62?N,*0>>,76?+AN.*6>1?0.+12024?@,.14+021A.*641?@962.,131.*63

90.63+0>F*+?*?12,[email protected].*636?1341A731?664+2/,@712F*+?*+.,46?+,+12+,<0,64E :<;W7@<>+?0/62?N,*0>>731=+46.*0.960,@36,.19+.+/0.6130=1+4,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*6 62=+312962.036A@>>N62A13?60<>6.*31@/*7639+.?124+.+12,U0/366962.,U131.*63960,@36,E M124+.+12,1A731V6?.07731=0>90N<6,6.A13.*+236A6362?6441?@962.,F*+?*04436,, 36Q@+3649+.+/0.+12960,@36,13U+2.*6?0,61A.*60417.+121A07>02U71>+?NU36/@>0.+12U13

1.*637@<>+?731V6?.U<N+2?137130.+2/.*69+.+/0.+12960,@36,+2.1.*67>02U71>+?NU 36/@>0.+12U13731V6?.46,+/2E
:?;83+13.1.*6?>1,61A.*67@<>+?36=+6F763+14A130430A.62=+312962.0>+970?.36713.13 9+.+/0.6426/0.+=646?>030.+12U036,712,+<>60/62?NU1307@<>+?0/62?N*0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+12 1=6320.@30>36,1@3?6,0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U,*0>>6+.*63,@<9+..1.*6>6040/62?N ?197>6.602446.0+>64763A13902?61<V6?.+=6,A139+.+/0.+12960,@36,F*+?*F1@>404436,, .*6,+/2+A+?02.6AA6?.,12.*662=+312962.+462.+A+64<N.*636,712,+<>60/62?N130/62?N *0=+2/V@3+,4+?.+121=6320.@30>36,1@3?6,0AA6?.64<N.*6731V6?.U1336A63.*6>6040/62?N.1 0773173+0.6U3604+>N0=0+>0<>6/@+46>+26,1336A6362?641?@962.,EW2N9+.+/0.+12960,@36,

!"#$ %!&#'()*+
,-./01123145625357289:.:5;2,<48,0.6257289:4;5857289:=5>087?-;0,30910484>2; 851-;56;2,4-;92,5@@29123.:1=2<;4?291,=566.260/012314/25,-;2,A=09=/01075120/<591, 14;2,4-;92,A=09=5;2,-.?291141=2,151-14;:5-1=4;01:4@B58332@0801048,5<<6095.6214B1=51 57289:CD4/<6058924;84894/<605892.:5;2,<48,0.6257289:4;57289:=5>087?-;0,3091048 4>2;851-;56;2,4-;92,5@@29123.:5<;4?291A01=1=51;2E-0;2/281,=56684160/011=2 5-1=4;01:4@1=2;2,<48,0.6257289:4;57289:=5>087?-;0,30910484>2;851-;56;2,4-;92, 5@@29123.:5<;4?291B4;1=25-1=4;01:4@1=2625357289:B145<<;4>2B948301048B4;328: <;4?291,5,<;4>0323.:1=0,30>0,0484;58:41=2;<;4>0,0484@65AC F=2GGHIA066,2;>214349-/28194/<605892A01=534<123J92;10@023/010751048/25,-;2,1=515;2 @4;/-6512314/080/0K20/<591,5,,4905123A01=@-1-;232>264</2811=51A4-63.25994//435123.:1=2 L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658C
NOPQRSTUVWXYZZ[R\
F=2I;4?291948,0,1,4@5,<290@09<658B7282;56<6585/283/281BK480874;30858925/283/281B583]DI 5/283/28114,=5<21=26583-,258332>264</28148^B_`^59;2,CF=2I;4?291948,0,1,4@1A494/<48281,a ^b1=2L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658cLdMLIeL<290@09I658b94>2;087^B_fg59;2,583gb1=2948>28104856 K480875;2594>2;087h59;2,CF=2948>28104856K480875;250,32,9;0.23,15;108748I572ijg^4@1=0,,291048C k41=4@1=2,25;25,948,101-121=2l<;4?291m@4;<-;<4,2,4@DdnMB.-15;232,9;0.23,2<5;5126:.264AC Xopqrstuq[vstXwsxyzyxQ{t|
F=2L4-1=25,1M;25L<290@09I658948,0,1,4@^B_fg59;2,5830896-32,^Bifg59;2,9-;;2816:K4823lI}j^B LdM}~IBmh_59;2,4@1=2L585.;026H0>2;583]4,D2;;014,D=58826B58359;2,564871=2,4-1=25,12372 4@1=29-;;281I}j^.4-835;:CF=0,j59;25;250,1=2;2,-614@5.4-835;:53?-,1/281.21A228]4,M87262, 583;5872D4-81:1=51A5,5<<;4>23.:1=2649565;25@4;/5104894//0,,04808g^gB.-182>2;-<3512308 I}j^CF=2<;4<4,23L<290@09I658A4-63;2<65921=2^hffL4-1=25,1M;25}2>264</281~/<;4>2/281I658 cI}j^bC
]583-,232,07851048,A4-630896-32aL087625/06:H2,03281056BG-610j5/06:H2,03281056BG4.0624/2,B D4//2;9056j
207=.4;=443BG023,2D4//-801:D4;2BG023,2G5;085B~83-,1;056BI-.609B<28L<592 583H29;251048BD45,1565.0151J216583,JH29;251048BD=58826JG5;085J512;A5:BH07=1j4@j5:JD561;58,B 583}23095123H07=1j4@j5:c841.-061bC
]583-,2,1510,109,5;2<;4>032308F5.62^j^Ck-0634-14@1=2L<290@09I6585,;2>0,23-832;1=2H23-923 ~8128,01:M612;8510>2A4-635664A5141564@Bi3A266087-801,BgBih`B_f,E-5;2@2214@ 94//2;9056J2/<64:/281-,2,B583if=4126;44/,C

!"!#$%&'( )*"+,
-./01232456781.97:;1.4<1=>?>=@0.AB.ACD9146EE.;F GH>97>AI@;5J1=7>5AK17LA=;1.91
M
NNOPQRSTUQUUVWQXYP

ZNUQPYU[RQXTPPQ[RY

\N]
N^
_`WQRT[QPSUWQVTYQXPSVRSQRS[

N^

OVQXXXVQSRP[PT

N OVSXVSXR
\
O[QVY[[[QPSWWR
Z\
a^b
\cdN\
efO_\g
WR[Xd
\cWR[U`h
[hc
i[gZ
^

O\NZ

Obc

g
N j

c
O
Oc
NNTP\
O
U\
O
OZNbZ^gZ
^

kZO

g^h
Whc
k
\
\OOObNb[QPY[\
Oa[`[QPSW\
OMcc

O

\b\NQMc\c\NZ

Oc
TP\
ObM
M^O
U\
ONc

OZc
OgZ
^d
W`T\
Oc
\j
Nl
cM

c
i[gZ
^gZ
j

\b\Nh

mnoppqrqsnrsrtuvuwxqvupuyuzunr{s|rtu}~uq|qyon{xto{puuys~zunr{ronpovp{pu{qnxqpuyqnu{ rtuvuovuonxz
uvs|~vsurpu{qn|uorxvu{rtortouzqrqorqnu||ur{s qyqrqz~vsuzunr{qnyxpu
untonupvsopo
qyuonp~upu{rvqonsnnurqqr}}}urqsn{qu{onp}~uqoypu snpqrqsn{~vsrur{unqqu{onpvuwxqvu{un{qrqupu{qnopounrrsuryonp{zovqno{onporuvo{ }}}urqsnqvp}o|uvuorzunr{vupxu{qz~or{vuyoruprs qvp{
oppvu{{qnrtuqnruv|ou

uruunrtuuryonp{o{u{{unrqoy
qvpto
qroronpxv
onx{u{mru{ro
yq{tu{vqruvqo|svyqtrqnyonp{o~qn
onp|oopurvuorzunr{rszqnqzquyqtr~syyxrqsnqnnorxvoyovuo{onp qvp{rvqu{tu~vs~s{up}~uq|qyon
oy{su{ro
yq{tu{ouryonpsn{uvorqsnonpsnqrsvqnxnp}}}urqsnrs~vu{uvuonpvu{rsvu uryonp{onpvuwxqvu{uryonp
x||uv{|svpuuys~zunropounrrsuryonp{}}}urqsn ¡5A¢1A7>5A.0£5A>AI:;1.
tuvuzoqnqnnqnuovu{s|yonpqnrtuvsurovuopqvuryu{rs|rtuovqnoq{roovovu~vs~s{uprs

uu¤rvorup|vszrtu¥snqnpu{qnorqsnonpsnuvruprssnunrqsnoysnqntq{ovuosxypnsr u
qnyxpupqnrtu~vs~s{up}~uq|qyon¤q{rqnyonpx{u{qnrtq{ovuoqnyxpu{qnyu|ozqytszu{onpo|qvu {rorqsntu~vs~s{upyonpx{u|svrtq{ovuoo{puruvzqnup o{upsnu¤q{rqnsnpqrqsn{onpsxyp
u
pu{qnorup{qnyu|ozqyvu{qpunrqoy¦snupuuys~zunrq{qnrunpup|svrtq{ovuoonpns~t{qoytonu uoppqrqsnoypuuys~zunrqnrun{qrsvvupuuys~zunrq{u¤~uruprssxv§oyyu¤q{rqnx{u{qrtqnrtq{ ovuoovuu¤~uruprsvuzoqn
snunrqsnoysnqnpu{qnorqsn¨¦{qnyu|ozqyvu{qpunrqoyo{ts{unrs usn{q{runrqrtrtu
u¤q{rqnvu{qpunrqoypuuys~zunr¦snupuuys~zunrq{qnrunpupqnrtq{ovuo©qunrtorrtuu¤q{rqn qnrun{qrs|puuys~zunrq{nsru¤~uruprstonu
xqypsxr~vsurqsn{|svrtunqnuovusnunrqsnoy
snqnovuoo{{xzunstonuqnnxz
uvs|puyyqnxnqr{sv~s~xyorqsnxqypsxr~vsurqsn{|svrtuovuo ovu{tsnqno
yu

!"#$ %!&#'()*+
,-./01234567068956-/:5696;<=0-
>?9@896;4567068956-/:5696;AB2:560
C
DDEFGFG

HDIIII

HJDKL
MNIOIGFNIOIGF

DP

E Q Q
D E Q Q K
EGG

ER
SETH
U

1VWXBYZ>4,[Y4<,\Y]
^_`abcd`efgb`ghicjf_`ickf_`gif`lm`cnf_`ohfpcnqcjmr`ge_sogthncbjhgsuhf_hjqcivjm`t`iockjfp gjlwcbl`bhjmxbgjm`ockjfpy^_`gb`g`jecz{gii`i|s}~|geb`igjlecjihificnf_`gb`gickf_cnf_ fb``fs`gifcnr`ttntcu`brckt`gbls`gifcnf_`qcjmr`ge_gbhj`fglhkzgjlvtgzhfcirgplceisickf_ cnoctcbglcfb``fsgjljcbf_gjlu`ifcnqcjmr`ge_iickf_`bjwckjlgbpy^_`qcio`bbhfcio_gjj`tgjl gj
gwbh`th`bbkjf_bckm_f_`abcd`efgb`gfcugblf_`vtgzhfcirgpgjlagehnhexe`gjgjlgb`hjetkl`l gi{gbfcnf_`abcd`efgb`gy
`mhcjgtgee`iifcf_`abcd`efgb`ghi{bchl`lwpjf`bifgf`}}gjly}bkji`gifu`ifsgjl f_`bkjijcbf_ickf_j`gbf_`jcbf_`gif`bj{cbfhcjcnf_`abcd`efgb`gyvticsfgf`ckf` hjf`bi`efiuhf_gjlbkji`gifu`ifhjfcf_`jcbf_`gif{cbfhcjcnf_`abcd`efgb`gsgjlf`bzhjgf`igif_ fb``fgtcjmf_`abcd`efijcbf_`bjwckjlgbpy
1V\,\<,\Y]Y]\,YB\]XBYB<YB<]\:<,\Y]
ovb`khb`if_gfgb`{cbfhjmcbzcjhfcbhjm{bcmbgzw`glc{f`lncbf_`ecjlhfhcjicn{bcd`efg{{bcgt f_gfgb`j`e`iigbpfczhfhmgf`cbgchlihmjhnhegjf`nn`eficjf_``jhbcjz`jfakwthe`ickbe`iocl` |~|yy^_`zhfhmgfhcjzcjhfcbhjmgjlb`{cbfhjm{bcmbgzhil`ihmj`lfc`jikb`ecz{thgje`uhf_glc{f`l zhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`ilkbhjm{bcd`efhz{t`z`jfgfhcjycb`ge_zhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`b`eczz`jl`lhjf_`s i{`ehnhegfhcjigb`zgl`_`b`hjf_gfhl`jfhnpf_`gefhcjb`khb`lgjlf_`zcjhfcbhjmgjlb`{cbfhjmf_gfzkif ceekbyjgllhfhcjsgb`i{cjihwt`gm`jephihl`jfhnh`lncb`bhnphjmecz{thgje`uhf_hjlhhlkgtecjlhfhcjicn g{{bcgtecjfghj`lhjf_`ay^c`nn`efh`tpfbgegjllcekz`jff_`ifgfkicnzhfhmgfhcjz`gikb`isg zhfhmgfhcjzgfbh_giw``j{b`{gb`li``^gwt`|y

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN4OC=PQOHC-RSTU
VWXY
Z
[V

\
WXZ]
^]
X

WY
VX]V
_^]WX^WW W^X
_^

]
X]
[
V

W
W`a
b
c
X
XY T

XVT
Z

WX^W

Z]
]de]X

Zf^V
XWg

]

`Y
W]X^W]
_^

X
[Vg
h`
XW V

[W^X
g`]
WWX]V
W]
[X

^WX]
V
X]Z W^V
g

W]
[
g`
[Vc

XVXW VX
`YXV`Xi

Y
g`]

VY
X^W
X
jX

^VXh

WX^Wf]

\
W X]V
X^] V

V

VXWV
`X]Z
_^Y

c]
X
XYWX^W
_^

[
de
]X

Zh^WX^Wf]
WX^WW WX]V
VXYV

^X
]
WX^WX

Y[
YWg`]

`Y
W]h
WX^W
_^

VX]VX
]kXf

VXf
^g
XYWX^W

X
h_^

X]Vg

V`X
[W

W
W
Z]
^YW
jX
W

Xh
X^W
WWX]VX
^] V
X V
YWX^W

X
W

Y[
^
XV
XW
VW
Z]

VY
X^W
X
jX ^V
lcmh

^
WX^W
W[
X

\
W

VWf

X^W

W

W]

[V

[WX

W]

[V

[WX

!"#$
%!&#'()*+
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQR
S
TO

U
PQSV
WV
Q

PR
OQVO
XWVPQWPP P

WQ
PO

O
V
ROS
QW
WW
M

QWYPT
QZ
V
[Q
XWQRWT

WQPOW

WV
QLWO\
QP
]
L^ WO
_`aZRWV

WP
b`

Ncd
QcV

\R
PVQOT
R\V
QQWVT
Y

O

WOPQWPQ
Q

PQc
e
OSO
PT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVO
QYOQVW
PT
V
PQWPQ

VWQ

S
c
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOQS

Q
QSV
L WO
bghiP
Of
b`M
RP
TPWQ
O\YQROQP

T

UP

WYOPVWVR
Q PWQ
QWOR
VWOc
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVO WN_MPVR
Y
WPjQ
VWO
fQ
fQOfV
OQ
OQ
QVO

OQSVRYPT
V
PT
V
PV
TQVQ WR

Pc
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOS
[
Q
W
QRP
Q
QWY

Q
WR
T\V
WQV
PQWPQ

WRV
Q

\c
eWOPQWPPT
QfV
PQWPP P
QVOQ
TVPOQ

W
T

Q
VbdO
Q
VWc
e
T\PQWPT
VPOQ
QVOY

j
VWQc
WW
M

QWYPT
Q

U
P
OP

QWP

P

PV

TO

TPQ

PV

TO

TPQ

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQR
S
TO

U
PQSV
WV
Q

PR
OQVO
XWVPQWPP PWQ
PQ

QOT
QSVTO
P
W
YZ
[P
OS
V
XW
W
WV
QLWO\
QP WO

] NY^
_QW

P
O
Q[^V
PQWPP PQVO
OQW

P
`WOMP

aWO

OQ_SV
RQaO
^Q
ROSMZ

Q
Q
\
V
QOa
POW

PV
WOaW

OQ
T
R
a\V

\R
PV

WPQWP^
W
PQWP
PT
Q

U
P
OP

QWP

P

PV

TO

TPQ

PV

TO

TPQ

LMb
QWP
RaWO

R
S
TO

U
PQ
SV
WV
Q

PR
O_V

\S
`
TO

QVOQVS V
aWO

OQV OU
OP
QY
VS
_
R Q_POV
QSV
_
\
Q[a

`QO

\
OP
Q^
OR
\
OP
QVOa
T
R
a\V

\R
PV
QWP
RP
RP
R
PW
\^

QWP
R
aWO

\S
`

TO

PV

TO

TPQ

PV

TO

TPQ

LMc
QWP
RaWO

QR
Q
O

U
PQSV
WV
Q

PR
O_V

\
S
`
TO
QVO
P
V
aWO

OQV
ROS
R
WQVT
a P

QRV
aWO
YQ[^

QORV
QRWQVOa
TR
a\V

\R

PV
QWP
RP
RP
RPW
\^
d
WORO\
S
OQ_
OPT
VPOVQVOa

PR

Pb^]efghY
Q
O
ZOW\
QW[RV

V

PVWP
O

^
dP\O

iQVOa

PR

P
b^]efjY
Q
OZW\
QW[RV

QWP
R
aWO

\S
`

TO

PV

TO

TPQ

PV

TO

TPQ

OR
O
T

V
QOWX
PX
O

QR
TYX

Z
W
[
UT
OXT
Q
X
SPT

TOX

RTWR
POXU
S Q

ORX

SPT
\O]^

OTRX
ORPOXTS
UR
SZ
X

ZR
QX
OPQ
RQ
RQ
R
QP
Z^
_
SPT
OWX
X
MQP
OY
QX[OXW
RQT
OXTS

Q`^abNcd\
O
TePZ
OP]RX

^
_

R T
fRTWM
YRP
TMRQ
Y

Q
T[U
XQTOXTS

Q`^abN`a\
O
TePZ
OP]RX

^
_
QT
OXTS
OT

OP
RP
TQ
U
XQTX
QX
O
TSP
WXdb

fO
Q
^
TOXTS
QO
WX
Q`^abN`d\
O
TePZ

OP ]RX

X

QX
PQ
T

OPQ
R
SPT

ZW
[

UT

QX

UT

UQO

QX

UT

UQO

PTW
VQR

XT
QT
RMQSY

RWZTU
T
S
[\

RSQW]R

YZ

SW

PT^Z\ X
XR
U
S
QR
_`

R
SZRWTSRZT
SRZQRT
RaZ
Q
XT

YS
XT

b
WT

YS
XT
RU

QR
ZTSRQcT
SR]
_ aT

YX
WT
XQ

RW
Y
b
W
US`T
RTSc

W
W
PT
SW
R

QRXT
R
XW

XU
S
Td
R

T

SWc

VQSY

RW`
XT
RTPT
W
S
W
R]
eW
R
S_
\ faZT
WQS

W
RPQS

eW
g`hijkZT

W
Td

eW
R^`\ZT

SWPSc
VQ

R
Tc
RUSc
WS
WTS
RX
eWR_
Ra
W
cS
X

QW

SW

W
R]W

cS
UZWSQ

XW
WTR`
RYWSQ

ZcQ
S

Z

RW
SR
ZSWXYP
TQR
W]R

QWRS

WQS

Z

VQQR
X
PVQ

j
U
TWSR`
R

T
RTSc

X

RQT
U
S
WQ

jW

T
R

US

SR W

XT

b
W`

RW
Y

b
W
US

YP
j

US

WT

US

UWR

WT

US

UWR

!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MNOPCQHRCKSH=TUQV=KTU
WX
YZ
[\]Z^_`]

a_

_]`

a_

bY
Z

_ _
[\

]_^cd
_
]e
Y_
Z]
c\
b
Y
_Y]\_]Z^^_Y_
]ZY
]
Y
Z
^fgZ_`

^_]h\
^_Y_
]ZY
]
]\_YZ

i_f]`a_^
_
Z

^]
j
kl\]Y_]
a
^_Y_
]ZY
]la[`YZ
_
Z]

_ [
]\
[\

b
YaflW]
Za
f

_]aY Z
]
[\

a_

l

`Y`bZ]
Y_[
]
]

Y_]Z\^c[_
`
c

Y]h
YZ]

Za
f]`]
a
c\

c

]

Y]c[_]^

c]
gZ
h\

b
Y
_Y]\_

]
\

]

b
Y
]a
]
Y]

Y_]Z

Y]
\^]cY]Z_[\

d

dh
`Y
_
a
Y
]
]^_
c\
b
Y
_Y]\_^
Y]f

]`

d

dh
\
]ZY
`

]c\

b
Y
_Y]\_]Z^
_]c
gZ

]c

_]j`

k\

Y\
a_
aY]

`
a[

a_h

YZ
[\
]Z^_`]

a_

_]

\

]ZY
`

]

b
Y
_Ym

a_

Y\

a_

aY]

Y\

a_

aY]

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+'
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:

LM
NO
PQROSTUR

VT

TRU

VT

WN
O

T T
PQ

RTSXY
T
RZ
NT
OR
XQ
W
N
TNRQTROSWOR
NT

S[\OTU

STRT
RQRONQWR
NTU
OR]^Q
WOR
NT

RQTS

ORQ
\ORU_`a[

RU
R_

RaWOR
N
OR
NbcUQ

TY
N

N`cUQ
VR
SRNX_Ma

YWOR
N
OR
N`dcMUQ

X_ea YfWOR
N
OR
Nbc`UQ

T
Y
N

N`eMdcUQ

L
T
NX
_baP
T
R

U
O
Q
TU
RTN^Q

W
NRQTS

R
V

NRWOR
NTP

R^
UP
T
V
N
R
RST
XQ
TNRQT
RO
TR UP
T
R
QS[N
U
TNLR

PT
R
ONQR
USgN

RNROTPQ
TNS

TL

LNR_

RX

YX YfX
h
RT
Ra^[X

TNX
h
RUQSRQTNOQ

Y

V

NRTSgQNV
RQ
^
UQ

TN

R
Q
TRNT[VST

O
RUPQ

Y
XQ

TN[
R

TRPQXPQNORS

V

S[Q

[
Q
RON
NR^Q

T

NROTPQ

TNS
NRQTNO

iR
ST
R
U

R O

VR

T
Q

TXR
TNX
R
N
UQSjR

T
T
XRNQ

OTX
NO

TRX
T_k[
OaX
TL

RV^
Q
RON
U

RNV
WOR
NT
RXQ

W
N
TNRQT
V

V
NQ

NQ
VT
VNR

Q_`aT
NR[

ROQlRQV
S S

R_OR
NbcUQ

TY
NaX

Y_
OR
N`dcMUQ

X
Yf
_
OR
Nbc`UQ

TY
NaXQ

NO
PQ
ROSTUR

VT

TR

Q

RON
U

W
N
TNh

VT

NQ

VT

VNR

NQ

VT

VNR

MN
MOPMQRP

M
SQ
TUVWP

N

M
NMPNX

Y

XZP

YN
YRM

[

\]
^M
Y
XNRN
MQR
M
^

_PXQP

YN

OP

`
R
NRMPNMQX
Y
RP

RP
YN
YRM

PSQN^

XNMPX

RMQR

N[P
RMQRNMPNX
RNZ^

a^
R
[RMQRR
MO
bOM
^SQ

O_M

QXN
_X

_PMQRPb

M[XNMPNX
M

QZ
RY
M[P
SQN^

XNMPNM

YN

N

`
RM

R^RR

QR

`
RRMP
M
Y
XNRN
MQR
M_P
`R
P

YN

`
R

Y
M MQY
a c

RMP
M
RM[

MQR
^

`
R
NRa

YN

RP

YN

YRM

RP

YN

YRM

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+',
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;

MN
O
PQR
S

PST

UV
WO

X
R
VRPOVRQ

P

QR
PQ

QRP

RPYV
S
Z
POV[

UV

VP
RO Q
W

VW
RPQRWO

TY
\
UV
POV[
P
[V
S
]QRRP
V
O
SVY
PQVRPQRM
V
P
^
_QV
`RU
MP
WORPQR
RRPOV
]Q
VRPQR
]Q

WS`

[V
WYO

VT

QSV
PWRP
YOQSR
Pa
PZ
_O
RPQRR RPOV
R
VPT
RPQR
]Q

PO

P

R
YTSP
U
R
PbYV
S
cPO

X
RP
Z
_O
RPQRR RPOVR
]Q

P

PO YVR
OP
R
[Y RPQRM
V
P
QR
P
P
MU

R
PbYV
S
c
QV
X
RPQRZ
_RPQRPOVRQYOdeS
S
P
P
O

P
RP
feS
SVO
P[
P

R
[TO
S
VT

TRZ

PQR
S

X
R
VR\

UV

RO

UV

URP

RO

UV

URP

Md

UVST

UV

XR
XQP
RVY
P
O[SP

RVPQ

RP
V
YO

PV[Wg
V
Ph
RV
QP
WO
X
R
VRPOVPQ[
O
R
V

X
RYV[

P
PO
V
PO

X
RaP[QSO
VOPOV[

OeZfSMR
V
PO

SO
O[ZOPYQV

PQOP
VO

P
PQV
`
PQ
SSRVOV
UP`R
O
PTS VOb
`
VTeZdSMR
V
PcZ

UVS
T

UV

XR

XQP
RV
Y
PO[
SP

RVPQ
P

RP
V
V
YO

PV[

X
R
VR\

UV

RO

UV

URP

RO

UV

URP

RY

ZQX[M

R
T
QTR
RVP[

\V
R
RVP[
PT

RT
R
R\V
R
RVP

XT
XR
V
R
[P
R T

UV

RT
QT
RVP

RPORX
TPX
V
P QXP

RV
UP
R VU ]

TRQVX

RT

RO
T X
R
V
V[R\

OPQ
PRST
R
P
UV
WT

WXR
TP
U
R

W
T
PTS

OP

TV

OP

OTR

TV

OP

OTR

M^
V
RXT
Q[XP

RYV

W
T
PT
S
RX[
_ [XP

RVP

X[M

RT
QT[TVX
[

O

[`V

TV
OP
OTR

XT
R
RV
R
[P
R T

UVPO
RO
[PTPV[\V
[TVX
RVP

R
PORX
YTPX
V
P QXP

RV
UP
R
VU ]

TRQVX

RT

RO
T X
R
V
V[RYTPX
V
aVbRXQ
Rc
R\V

O

[TVX
YPUV TV
RYVP[
TPX

R
QV
PS
R R
R
QV
RPP
X
Q X

OP
R\

RXT
Q
[XP

W
T
PTS

OP

TV

OP

OTR

TV

OP

OTR

ST URVWX

SWQY
ZR[O

S[QR P
R
QS
QR\
V]Q^
__

VQ
OPQRPP\
Q
PR
_

QPSQ
PO
QS
Q
`P
_

`
PQ
a_

PQRPQR\
V]Q^T[OPRQ

OVV
Q
b
Q
Q _VS

P[V

P[VO
P
SVPQRPP\
QaV
Q
[V\P

O_
QTR[
T

P
RQ_
V

VPa
OP\
Q

PR

Y_
O[T
QR ZR
c
d

PQM
PO
QR_[S

SVZR[O

S[Q

[

\S

O_
P\
Qa RY
_
\PVO
QQ_[S

R[_
VRS
Q_\
O[
a R
eP[RQSRO
WfO
Q_[S

RPQRPY

_
Q
PQ
[Pa_

O_
Q SPgh
Q_[S
OP

ZR[V
P

T_Qg

O[ifMO
\[QY
PQRP

Q
[
P\
Q
QP

O_
a
dQR\
V
SVZR[O

S[Q\
OV_
P\
Q

QY_
VR_\
O[
YQ_[S
QR

_

P_
\[
\PQ

O
_
QM SPgh
a_ZR[O

S[Q_[Q
\Q S[P[
R_Q

QT_
PQRPP\
QPR
P\
Q
Q
QR_
\

PQ_
Q PRa
dO[

O_
O
QY

SVZR[O

S[QY_[S
QR

_

P_
\[

\PQ

PQRPM
[
P\
Q_\
_
[
QRSVP\
Q
R_

QQ
a

_
_

VQ

O
PQRP
P\
Q

`
P
[Pb

\[

ZR[O

S[Q

P_

\[

\PQ

P_

\[

\PQ

WX

Y
Z[
\VX
[
[VZ
[]^_
[`
X

[aX
bV
[WTX
a[ZX
WVc
[VZ
`

[da

Y
Z

XZe

WX
[aX

a WXVZ
Z
faX

XZ\
`
Xd[
d
XZV

X[`
WXVa[ZX

[VZ
[c
`d\[

a
WXV`a

_d[

[

WX

Y
ZfXaW
[V\X
W
[`Za[ZX
[VZ
gcdfVX

VZ
[
_a

afVX
X
\ X\
`ZXV[
a

X`
[`[ZX
[VZ
[a
X[`

Za
h[ida

W[`
[V
Tj
[aX\

X

\_a

_f

Y
Z

XZe

WX

X

VZa
Y
Zk[
Z
a[ZX
[VZ
[c

[VZ

`

[

Y
Z

XZe

WX

Za

WX

WZ[

Za

WX

WZ[

Tj
`d\[

a
[WTX a[ZX
WV
bV
V

[V
TUd[

[

WX

Y
ZfXaW
[V\X
W
[
`Za[ZX
[VZ
da
_`
Za[X
bVa

_f

Y
Z
XZe

WX

X
a

`Xf
[Vlc
a\XZ
a
Z_`a

k[

[
Uc
`a

[

Y
ZXV

[WdX
d

a[ZX
[VZ
gZXV
X

Xida

_f

Y
Z

XZe

WX
[aX`[
h

[X
[

WdX
[d
[a
[ZX
[VZ

a[Z
fa
Z_`a

k[
[`
a\Xg
[id`V
l
a
lef c
[We
[
[e
a\Xe
a\e[
c
ac

[V\Z
`
a[ZX
[VZ
d
[

\_
a
[WTX
a[ZX

WXV`

_f

Y
Z

XZe

WX

Za

WX

WZ[

Za

WX

WZ[

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+'(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
L
MNO
PQMNPMQ
R
S
P
NS

TNO
O
NM
P

O

UN
O
NMVSORN
N
RP
SMNW NR P
S
Q

N
QWMR
N
RP
XP

PNR

NT
Y
RL
QL
MNPMQ
TX
P
NR R

N
PN

WRNSRXZ[NX
MNP
\]
^]

RNSR
RS
N
P
[OR
MR
XP

NQWPNR

NT
O
NM

P
RWOP

UN
O
NM
VSMORN
NXP

Y
R
XP

NR
MR
TXNL
RLP
_SMO

PNR

NT
O
NM
TX
P

MNPMR
RPM

RP
N

NSQP
P

WO
RP

TM
TRN

ORS
RL

NR
OP

M
RP
`
O
O
SNMWN
aPNRM
NSR

M
W

ON
MRPNRM
NSR
NQW
PNR

NT
O
NM
P
RW
OP

UN
O
NMVSORN
NOP
S
OP

b
RP
NOR
OP

W
XNSRP

M
MWNL

L_SMO

PNR

NT
O
NMNP
RNSRRT
NZ
WM
N
NSP

XZQ
R
S

M
NXP

NLP

M
N PMQ

S

TR
QWP

W

WX

b
R
MRa

TM
L
OL
WNO
P
_SMO

PNR

O
NMNP
TXPONP

PQMa
T

NS
R
M
L
L
P
TP WPNRM
NSR
cNd
MN

PXS

S
P PU

W
RU
WSO
VX

TOM

OR

Y
X

SXZ

QS

M

O[M
PMST

X
WR\M

PX
SORM

P[
[
ZN
SXN

S
][
VM

Y
XSW

SV
MPXS
PWX
UM

OR

Y
X

SXZ

QS
PMSVPXP

S
Q
M
PM
PXS
PWX

X

PM
Q
S
Y
X
QS
P

Q
NWPVM

TWS
[
^[
VM

Y
XP

PUM
PXS
PWX
PMWS
T

M
SX M
PU
M
PWX

PMWS
T
X

M
QS
Y
X[
_[
VM

PM
ZP
SXVM

MPXS
PWX
PV
PTS
MWX

TS
V
PTSOPW
OUM

OPMS
XSRM

O
R

Y
X
SXZ

QS
Q
VR
M
M

QS
Z
QS

Y
X`MR
QUSM

aWPWS

MP
PWMS
O[

[M

OS

][
VM

PM
P
SXV
M
PXS
PWX
PV
PTS
UM

O
R

Y
X
SXZ

QS
PMSV
OMPXS

PWX
PM

WSV

S M

WTSXVPS

VP
SXTOM

Ob
[M
PX
PWX
cPdMST

QP
TOM

OR

Y
X
SXZ

QS
WM
VSRSXPb
Y
X

SXePZ

QS
ePR
TcV
SXT
d`
OV

QR
MN

QST
PTN
P

QNS

UVW
XQU

N

U
Y
QSO

Z[Q

U
Q

QT
MT\[SU

QNS
NUSO [
Z[SUMQP
MQ

SQMP[X
]

Z[UMS
Q[M
Q
SM

NPS
N QMS
Q[M
^Q_R
Q
YSP
MUN
QMS
Q[M
^Q_R

U
O[QUN
QMS
Q[M
^Q_T

XQNS
Y
NZ[SU

P[X
T
UQ[MN
P[X
M
QUO
N
S

U
`N
XQNS
MQ[

S

NQMS
Q[M
TO
Y`SN
Z[Q[S

NQ
Q[NS
XT
T
M

aTN

XO

b
M
SMc

YS
QNS
M
dSe
YS

M[

M
M
ON
MXUN

fQ
Q

[
SQUMN
[S

M[
T
U N

Q[

SQYSP
N
USOSeQ]N
]cO T
QYcNQXcSMdOcMNgQ
gVTN
N
]cO T
QYcNQXcN

Q
Qc
hTN
T
N
NQONS
dUPSMed
ON

Y
Q^iMN
QPXjMN
QS
_UN

XQ ONS
QNSP

R
NM

QONS
U
Y
QU
SMhQ
OQ`

SQ`NQMY
OQN
YSP
T [U
akY
OQNOM
h

SQN
UNQMS

Q[M
Q
MN
QSP

RSY
OQ
QNON
OS

XQNSQP

QR
T

U

P
PQU

PW
X
SQPSM

N
RNP
MT
QPSM
R
MXPQR

QT
Y
QS
P
RXYP

ZQ
Y
QS[\YRQ
Q]P

V
RR

TS

R\
N

NP
MT
QPSM
R

X

S
SR]WN

NPMT
QPSM

QM\

P
YS]

Q
QY\Q
MXY\
QRP Q

\RQN
YQ\MX
R\
QU
RPYP
YS]

Q
QPSM
R

Q\
P
X]S
MS
R

P
Q^
XY
RP
\MSRMX_
RPQRS
R
X_Q
SQ
\MSRMX_\P

S
QS
Y

SY
T
QXU
\S
_

XY
RP
TS
TRQ

`M\S
YS
QaN
NST

\Q
bN
YQ
SRYP
QRS
Q\R
MXP

X
QR
SQP

X]

c
R

SRd

TS
QPSR
QST

\Q
S

YX
SQ

SQYP
Q\R
PR
M
QT

X

S]WN
NP
QST

\Q
SQPSM
RS\

R\
Q

YP
Q
QPSM
R

MXPQR

QT
Y
QS
P

RXYP

ZQ
Y
QS[\YRQ

Q]P

V
RR

QST

\Q
SQN
MNS
Q

SQPXM
QST
MS
RS\

]
Q_
Q_YS
Q_
RT
SQ_

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%'
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMNOPQR

SOP
T
U
SOV
Q
LOVQR
VSWV
QS

SOPRMWOS
O
WX Y
ZYW

[X

\
M
SMT

US
OWS

Q[
URSOP]OPLRO

O

MUW
OSU

OVW
O[MSR

LQR[
OVW
Q
LS
WRO]OVOSU
[
OYW
QSXO

WSL
N
L[W

[X

\
M
SMT

US
^
Y

QMQW

URSOP]OP
LRO

O

MUW
OSU

O
OWSL
M
S

MORSXW

[Y
LY

QMQW

URSOP]OP
LRO

O

MUW
OSU

O
OWSL
M
SOW

L[M

S[
O

O

MS[QOY
MY

OL
OSU

OWSL

UO
W

QSXSMOQ

Q_`
[OQ
QW

O LS
MUWO^

SO
O

MW

OSY
aYW

[X

\
M
SMT

US
OWS

UOSU
LSOW
SOPS
O

RMU

OLS
YOM
SO
Q
ROWSL

M
L[OOSU

O
PMS
b

X
WbMS

MORS
M
OM
U
W
YW
USQOSU
LSOWSL

L[SM
O
MMXW

c
MXW

S
OSU

RO
SOY

YW

S

UP

U
P
RMS

OR W

[ SO
M
dR
Se
Sf

ORMQ

O

O

MQWOMS
ORM
gO

MNO
PMOQRM

ONRMO

MP
S
TSU
R
O ULPM
OTPMTMR
MU
MO
MU
QR
MNO
NR

L
R
TSN

OR
MUO
VUOR
MULOTU

UOT

S
WM
WO
NRMOTN
UM

Q
ST
M
UXTOWOXUNU

NU
RMO

MS
NMWQ
RM
MO
YM

R

UXTOZMU

M
NR
TM
UO
[
MU
R
Y
MUO

MUORNO
\WOVR

NR
M
T
MURTX

XLR

L
OM
]XLOM
X
O

R
O
MN
STN
R

^
OV
MULX

STX
R

UXTO
RUM

M
TLPQ

M
MOR

M
MP]
NM

P
YMT
UT

M
V

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%,
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;

MN
O
PQR
S

PT
SUPQV
W

XY
ZRXR
P

OT

[
R
YRS
RO

XY

[
RP

S
XY

QPO
QO
P

RS
YPOY
X

YPO

US
ROSWQYS

RO
YP

Y
YP
\S
ZRXPSX
VY]Q
PSR

^]O

O
RUSO

_P
S
PY`QSRP
Pa
O
YPOYP
O

[
R
YROP

OP
XQYPT
O
RO
YRYPQY]YV

QY

XQPYU
PQV

P
O
PSR
Q
MPQVRX
P
O

YYRYPQY]Y
V

P
QY
ORQPV
Y]bS
O
Q

PQSR
a
O
XRO
YRY
Y
YRY
PQR
P

PRX

QQ
MPQVRX
PTO

S
PY
RO
YRY
Y
YRYPOYX
OQOUOY
URX
P
X
PYU
R

YUPSRQY
PQR
PQYO
URV
SYU
XYQ

aQP

SQ

PQVR
PO
XRUSO

PRX
POYV
YS

QYO

RO
YRY
c
Y
YRYTR
]O

RPQRR RTOP
XYQ

PRX
PP
]O
O
UPSRQY
PQR
PT
QPO

YS
X
Y`QUR\
`^a
SPSR

TO

O

[
RPOYV
WQ

S

RXUT
S
PY

SRT
RV

P
YRV
T
O
P
RY
PQ

PaO
PQR
POYV
S
SRQ

PU]O
XVYR
PU

QRY

PRO
PO
YPTQROPO
P
YP
QU
QP
SQYPU
YS
X
PUT
QY
T
O
YRQP

PUa
SQP

PUP]Y
R

O
PQR
TOPQR
POYV
RP

O

USO

U
UV
P

STPS

TZRO

T
O
]PO
Y
VUO

UP
R
a

PQR
S

PT

SU
PQV
W

XY

ZRX
R
P

O

[
R

YRc

XY

RO

XY

XRP

RO

XY

XRP

MNO
PQR
SP
T
PTUV
USVW
X
V

YO
VZV
[W

VZ
O\
W

SZ
VW[TO
ZSW
Y
VUO

PY
P[W
]TP
Y
VZT
M

PTUVY
P^U
O_
ZP

P`aW\
U
O_bY
ZP

P\
cT
_
Z
P

PVXW
de

VW
X
V\W

X
V

OV[TO

VZ

Y
V[W TO

V
SW

Z
POVW
OVO
TMVO
eW
Y
V[TO
WY
WP
TWSWOVY
PWVTO
Y
POS
VW
OVO
UOVT
PTV
PW

Z
POVW
OVO[TO
eW
Y
V[TO

V

PT
Y
\

PY\
b
VYY
VVW
OVO
b
UOVT
PTV
P\
VUO
\
[TO
VY
SPTVW

PTV
PW

U
POf
S
PV
\P

OVU
e
O
PQR
SP

PTUV

X
V

OVb

YO

VW

YO

YVP

VW

YO

YVP

MgS

YO
WP
P

YVO
PWO

TO
PTV
P
Y
P
W

PTV
Z

PeW
VTO

PWOU

US
]TOZ

VW
OPVP
[W
P
VP
P
T

OPeW

PWOP
ZWV
Z
YOTW

PZV
Z
PTV
P
VY

TVPTV

ZS

VYSW
P
V

TP

X
V

VPZV
PTV
Pe T\W

PWOVT

PT SZYOU
Z f [P

P
Y

OVPW

X
V
hWPVO
iZW
YOTZ
PTV
PWSU
VT

TVPTVh

]TP
W

ZO
OUS
W
PU

V]T

ZPZV
YOT

V
eW

[OP

ZSP

VZOP[W
VTO

PTV
PP[TO
U
]T
T

ZS

VT
]TPZZVPTVY

T

PTV
Z

X
V

OVb

YO

VW

YO

YVP

VW

YO

YVP

QR
STO
N
MO

OMNOM
UMV

MV
NW
XT
S
Y

MZ[\P

]ONTSOT

NO^M
NTXMOXT
MOYM

TN

TMNYS
N
N
W
ON

O^XM
NOM
NM\[_ZP`
ST
N

^
SV
M

NMWT
M
TNabTONSYT

PT

cXT

SYT

NdeTO^
T
NXf
Y
NM
ST

MN
V
MWcT XT

T
X

cTMON
SMNTOX
^
f

XcT
T
NP

NVST
N
XM

g
M
N
X
V
NTX^
MN

P hTabTONS

NMV
TO

NSV

M

g
M

XMi

VX

MT

VX

VMN

MT

VX

VMN

\_
`]a
`a

b
^\c[
][
\

^_
ad[

b
^

a^e

`a
\[a\]f
[\

`
a

\
gh[

i_
^[
`a
`^\

_i
`
a^
\_[

`a
\

c[^\

j[

\

\[af

fi`
a
_
\a^
^
c[
[
^^
i_
\

a\gh

Zklmjnd

^
_`
a
\ o

[\

`
a
\
^
\j
_
^p

`
a^
\
a
\a ]
c

_

[

\

d[

b
^
a^\[a

_\a
\a\
\
ad\
q]
d\
_
[\

j
_^\
_]
\_^a
`\d[

b
^
a^\[a

a
^

\ac[
`\[
^
^
c[\

a^
^i
q]\g
a_

_r^]f\^
\

ad
as
t]ai
a
d
^[

d^jha^

\a
e
a
^]

\[af

_
]a

\

^
^
c[

a^f
c\

]a\
[
^
a
_
j

[
\]^
_f]a

^]
[
^
a
d
\]ad
i_acY]

[

^

\d_id\[af

[

i_
^[

`a
`^\

`
^[ a\

^`
\[`
f ^
a

j

[

\]^
_

b
^

a^e

`a

^[

`a

`^\

^[

`a

`^\

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+%(
,-./01234567-894 56:97-;<0=8:6597<0>?5:@ 96A
4567-8940-A?:,5@97
<0A=895./0
B@=/0 9657
C-:6D
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
E8F?@096
G8F-659
H48956:97
<0F8:;I
J8@=/06589E-60
<0A=895./0
48956:97C-:6D
C:8K0F6457-89
48956:
LMN
OPQP
RS

S
T
R

UQ
VPS

R

OW

R

WXVY
SP
QPZ[\V
PSWT
R
RPSRRUX
PVQW
VQ

ZV
PS

RP
R
PVQW
UQS

WX]SQO

U
Q
O
PQ^
V
PSQOV
UQSPVQW
PS

V

O
_RSWPR
P
Q`
aZV
P
QP Qb

cSQX
Q
` bc
aV

QRW
UPV
RXZ
P

Z
V
RPX
P

d
Q
PSVQ
W

Q

eP
R
WX
Z bc
ZV

QRW

U
PV
RXeSQP

RO
]SPOV
UPV

RPPO

OSV
RPS

^
S

RU
P

T
R

QRd

UQ

RV

UQ

URP

RV

UQ

URP

QTVWRU
Q
QRS
QXP

Y
S
USZ

[U
QPUS
RP
TU\
Q

SQ
Q
TUWR
Q
QRS
Q

QPU
[

P
VT
SP
[U
[SQ

\PS
VTP

T
SP[
Q
Q
]
^P

Y
S
USQPU

UT

QW

RU_
`

TW

Y
S

UX_SUR
`X[
QPX

TUQW
NS
UQ_
`

SR

]P
W
XS
X
Q
UT
U
QPUW
S
R
S
S
\P
RP

QaRUV
QSbQ RU
cdeO

T
RUU
fX
Scghi
_QW
`]
^P

Y
S
USQPU
US
Q
S
T

U
Q

SZQ
S
RP
W
XS
X

Q
UTU

\Q
SR

]P
SS

U

Q

SZQ
PUW
ST

WVP

T
RWUS
UP_

`]U

W
QPU
W

T

WV

NS
T

UQR

[Q

N
S
T

\j
R

P
SQR

[QTU

[QS
T

WV

]P
W
XS
X

Q
UTU

\Q
SR

QPUW
S
R

S
S
\P
SR
UT
V

UP

Q RU
hik

cihlk

T
RUXU
fX
ScgOh]_

`]
^[

STP
SS

T
QUQ

WVP

Y
S
USQPUW

[

VT
SP

[U
[SQ

]
UVXSSQ

T

U
\Q
[UQP
[

[
STW
S[
QP

VT
SP
RU

T
VR
]

QRS
T

Y
S

USZ

[U

SP

[U

[SQ

SP

[U

[SQ

]`a

d
_]
^\
^\
]

_`
ce\

a`

_\]c
]^\
`cf

b
]
`^ca
`^

`

c

g
ha

bc

d
_\f^c

_
i]]
`_c
]f\
^\
]

_`
c
j
^kc_

b
l\]c
\
mnZ_\
] o
\c`^a`^

]o`]^_\`c
] ^mnZ_\

]o]

_k

a`
_\
^kc_pq]

r
ha

bc

d
_\f^c

_\
`^]
]`
a`
_\s]

]
_`
]\fa`f\_
b
]
f
_

ka\
mtu]

c`

]\c`^a`^

]o`\]

]
]
_

kcf\
`c]o
]

]_k

a
`
_\
^kc_pq]

r
v
]mtwxu
mt[uxt_\
]yv
mtwun_\
]y
v
mtz[wn_\
]r
ha

bc

d
_\f^c

_\
`^]
]`
a`
_\s]

]
bcpaj
mtw[l`f\_

b
]f
_

ka\
mtu]

c`

]\c`^a`^

]o`\]
]
nw_\
]\
`c]o
]

_k

ka
`
_\
^kc_pq]

]^_
`

k^c

]

_\

bc

b_]

_
f\

d
_

c_{

bc

_\

bc

b_]

^kc_pq]

]

_\

bc

b_]

PST

UV

W
RP
QO
QO
P

RS
VX

W
R
VRPY

UV
PSQRO
W
RPOV

P
M
P

RSOT
VT
OTQVRPQ
TSO
MP

SM
P

PT

R
T

TSO

ZPPT
[O
T
VT
OTQVRPQ
TPOV\
PQ

TS
RO
Q\VR]^P

S
U_

UV[

PQR
S

\QV

W
R

VRY

UV

RO

UV

URP

Q\VR]^P

P

RO

UV

URP

M`O

W
R
VRY

UV
S
RO

W
RO_QV
\
R

\TO
QO
P

RS

VPOV
aQPO
bV_\

PRO
cd_ORVP

^
SV_
PRO
PR

ZPR
P\

V
SV
RVRPPdSO
P
VP
QT

Q\VR]^PX
POVR
VT_OPQR
PRO
[

VR

_O
bV_\

PRO
cPOV\

OT
VT
OTQVRPQ
T\
R
V

QP

PQMN[

PQR
S

\QV

W
R

VRY

UV

RO

UV

URP

Q\VR]^P

P

RO

UV

URP

MeO

W
R
VRY

UV
XRO
X
RPQRR R
S
RO

UV

W
RO_QV
\

R

\TO
QO
P

RS
VPOVR

V_M
R

UV
f
g\
P

R
Pf
Pg
_O
P
RU
W
RX
U
S_
aQVT

QR
Y
R
R
_OVRP_

aQP[

PQR
S

\QV

W
R

VRY

UV
X
RO
X

PQR

R

RO

UV

URP

Q\VR]^P

P

RO

UV

URP

Mh
PQ\ S

UV

VRPS

UV

W
RP
O
PQQ
i
fP

TjPQV
i
P
VgO
UV
URP

POV

W
R
VRP_OPQ_
P

P

VP[
Q

UV

VRP

RO

UV

URP

RO

UV

URP

RO

UV

URP

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,'
-./012345678.9:5 67;:8.<=1>9;76:8=1?@6;A :7B
5678.9:51.B@;-6A:8
=1B>9:6/01
CA>01 :768
D.;7E
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
F9G@A1:7
H9G.76:
I59:67;:8
=1G9;<J
K9A>01769:F.71
=1B>9:6/01
59:67;:8D.;7E
D;9L1G7568.9:
59:67;
MN
O
PO
POQ
RS
T
O
UOV

WU
V
VXU

V
X
WU
WOV

XU
V

V
VOUQ

W

X
YV

V

VOU
X V

VYQU
Z
VQQ
[
\V

R]VQU[
V
U^_XVPO
VXUOQ

VQY
V

V
UV Y
U
VPQU
UOZ
WOQ
UV
Q
V_

O
PO

POQ
R

T
O

UO`

WU

OX

WU

WOV

QZUOabV

V

OX

WU

WOV

cd2efgChiMj
VQO
P

US
S
`ZQU

WU

T
OV

ZRX
QX
V

OP

US
VXUZ

WU

UV
OX

Q
S

US
OVQOSX

R
Y
`
WU
VXUZ
V
ZU
P
kQOOV

U
X
PUY
VQUOVQOM
U
V
l
m
VQOOWRVU

R
XQVZ
Y
nn

RXQ

R
oN

Q
RSV

OZ

R]VQO
UO

VQOV
XZ

Q
RV_
mU
UOZQV
VO VQO
kQ

QObV
P

YX

UR

QPU
V_
mR
kQ

VQOXV
V

O

VXUZ
O

VPVP
ZU
P
ZRV
MW
QV _
mOb
UVUO

VPVP
ZU
P
ZRV
M
V
W
O
V_
m
VQOPOVXUZ

X
QU
V

VZUVX

ZRX

RP
OX_

VQO

P

US

S
`
ZQU

T
O

UO`

WU

OX

OX

WU

WOV

OX

WU

WOV

VT

W
Q

XP
T

VSTOYZ

W
Q
TQ[

VT
OZT

O

VS TUOO

T
O

VS
QO
T
Z
OQV
O\Z
]P
T
VOZT
]Q
^\NQZ[O

Y_ZQOZ
TVZQQPO
QZ
PT

RU
QT
O
TQOPQ\
R
]PT
VO_PT

]Q
ZOZOT
YT
V
Z
OOPQZQT
OY
]
TOV
STOY
T
T
O
O

VOZTS
PO
\

OPQ
R
SPT

W
Q

TQ[

VT

QZ

VT

VQO

QZ

VT

VQO

M`
OPQ
RSPT

R
W
QOVTZ

VT
R
_
POTPO
_ZN^ R
RU
]O

O
TPO
YZ

U_
[
VT
OZT
QPOQT

Q
P QPOQTUOZ QTP

OVS
TUOR

T
QORVS

SU
POT
QV
O\Z

T
QPOQTUOZTS
OP

U
R
QZ
VT
VQO

R
V_
OZT

O
Z
VST
VOU
SU
O
TPO

_PT
S
T_abc
PZ

U
dae^
f
aN
c
PZ
Z
de^
afY_ZQ
Z

T
O
OgO
U

Z
Q

PT

TVS
QO R
Q
O
TPO
\

OPQ
R
SPT

W
Q

TQ[

VT

QPOQT

QZ

VT

VQO

QZ

VT

VQO

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,
-./012345672138743 9123:8;
<=
>
?@A
B>
B?C@D

@?>

E
AF>

GB
A>?D@

>
GH?BA
B

AD@

>
I
?@D

?@

<JK>

G?>D

L
M@?L@
G>ND?
I?>

C?B
O@

ID

AB
?@

=PQD
?F?
A
B
CG
DB

I APQ
?OKF?@

A>
?@

B>

K>
?CD?>

@?
@

=PQ
O@> L
?CD
?>
L
M@?
C
N > BA
I
?
BAD
?O@

>
BA
A?B
N
ID

@?>

E
AK
BA
I
?
BAD
?A?G
>
E
A

A?>DC
AD@

F>

I
?F>
=PQ

M@?
GK>

GH?B

?>DC
@

>
M@??@
GK

? ?
N>?
NA?@AFA
?
?O@
B

M?C@D
F>
AI
?B
M?
?O@
B

?I@?K>
ID
B?AD

D

N
A@D
I
?
><BNGAO@?K

?AD@

CG@D
G>

O@
B
F
ND@F>
DCG>

KBAB
?
AD@

N>G>

DAC
B?
GCD
>
>C@D

? @

GND@?
> BAB
?B@
A?@AR
A@
B
?
IA

B@
A?@ASB>

?

I
?

?@
<JK

?@A

B>
B?C@D

GB

A>

A>

ID

IA?

@CDATU?

?

A>

ID

IA?

<V?
B>
?@C
O I
D
INB

ID

E
A?
>N@D
C
A

CG>

F?
<
ABBA?@
G
?>DC

CG>

E
A
DAW

ID

ID@
>

E
AH?

DBA
?

A?
N>

GB
A>@

D?BDX

?A?
>
?

D?
@G

@

BG?

AB
I
?F

A?GF
I

BA
?
A@D

A
?F
DA@>@BA
EA
>C
?K>
BA
?@
GB>
B?

ID

E
AC
A?

@
>

?>DA@

DG?BDBV

>@
D
?

BG
E@?
?

I
?D?GA>XK
>
BA?@
G?>DC

I

CG>

@CDATU?

G
B
?FA?@AB
I
?F
?D?>DC

D

?@A
BC@D

K
?
B>

?@C
O

I
D

INB

E
A?

E
A

DAW

ID

A>

ID

IA?

@CDATU?

?

A>

ID

IA?

!"#$%
&!'#()*+,

-.
/01
2304

54

6
1/7
804
3
1

397

:
6
1
41/;

54
/
/74<
2-/7

9 /7

92
178

1/0127
21
5
/4

348=7
248
21
5
/
214
/1/9

1/2
7

/743
140

9>/2
17/?@A
BCDEFGHIDFJKLMNOPFQRSLMTOR GFE
0

3<
U -VW
/30

/A
/01/
4
/

0
308781044
/:87/073
/4

?39
/@4
=7/073

17804
3
/

878
704
/

/7

70-4
204
X78/30

17804
75
84
204
/

70/4

X

7
730

17804
75
8704
/

70/4

=7/
0804
3
20

92

17

5

4?

@
2-/7

130/2

54
/=
YZ[\F]^O_`aLbM`^c\bdeIOEF_M]G^b`RSEA
/01/
4
/

0
308781044
/:87/073
/4

?39
/@4
=7/073

17804
3
/

878
704
/

/7

70-4
204
X78/30

17804
75
84
204
/

70/4

X

7
730

17804
75
8704
/

70/4

=7/
0804
3
20

92

17

5

4?

@
2-/7

130/2

54
/=4
5
49:7
/1
104

/4f

87
248
5
/A
Y
297
8/30

1728 4
204
/

704
:7
4204
/

704
=
Y
297
/073

172
4204

704
:
4204

7
70
4
/=
Y
f
7

/419
7/
/
4=
Ygh[\JMSaO LbM`^ceG^\FLO A7/
/1804

i0
7
248
5
/A
Y
297
730

172
/7

70-
4 204

704
:
/7

70-
4 204

8704
/=

/01
2
10
9

6
1

41;

54

17

54

51/

0341W</

/

17

54

51/

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,-
.
/01
2345

61/
7/57
82
157
38

31

15957
8
27
/57
382157
38

31

15957
:
.;<=;>?@ABC DEFG@HIBCJK >LM13
36257

N51/72
O
3M
.
6/5
1145

61
O

7/957
8
31

15P95
7
:
.
3514
1957
:
.

345
1957

15P957
3 157
:

QLR SFATKCUFBV;WXYZ[TAH\BI]C^A_R`BIKCR >Aa
.X=F>?b=@AL?CcFdBeIF?D@ef;[CaAfF>?gaAcIL>?eFR`ah

3563
73

5
452126577
3821
3514
37
i403j7
:13514

61257
4

212157
3

31

1597
/57
k
1
2345

61257
1O
27
/57
3

1
537

k
1
145

61257
1O
215
7
3

1537

:13
5257
4
/5

0/
61

O

7i

j:
7
O
7081
36657

37l

/72
O
3M
.
/01
2345

61/2 7
/57
3

157
81
7/57
3

15
7
:
.
/01
145

61/
157

15957
82 157
3

15957
:
.
/01
3514

61/
7/57

157
8
7/57

1
15
7
3:
.
l
1

3760
13
3 7:
.bY=mFBT>nBTKCD;>?@ABC h13
36257

N51
/72
O
3M
.
/01
145

61/
7/57
8

!"#$%
&!'#()*+,
-.

./01
2/1
3 ./1
3

./1
34 1
2/1
-3
./1
3

./1
5
6
27.
-/.8

9.2
12/1
3
-.

./01
2/1
3

./1
341
2/1
-3
./1
3

./1
5
6
27.
4-8/

9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3

-.

./0/1
341
2/1
-34./1
-3

-.

./0/1
5
6:;<=>?@AB CD?EFGHIF=JCB K.-
-94/1

L/
.
214
M
-N
6
27.
4-8/

9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3

-.

./0/1
341
2/1
-34./1
-3

-.

./0/1
5
6
27.
-8/

9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3

-.

./0/1
3

12/1
3.
./1
-3

./
1
5
6HO<PQRG=JSFBTEACD?EFK.-
-94/1

L/.
214
M
-N
6
27.
-/.8

9.2
12/1
34
./1
-3
./1
3

./1
3

12/1
3.
./1
-3
./1
5
6
U2.

-197
.-
-
15

!"!#$%&'(
)*"+,(

-.
/01
2304

54

6
1/7
804
3
1

397

:
6
1
41/;

54
/
/74<
2-/7

9 /7

92
4 178

1/0127
21
5
4/

348=
-/7

9
/741070
>?@
38 7

92
4 17
92/7
20
27

5
A@
9
7

92
4 1721
2
7 /3

B0/
C0/1

1D5=

EFG
/C=@
?.
4=

2 /=E?HAF=.D@ =7
212

0/140

7
/1
5
/

348=
27

9I/21

7/1

7/1/

3487

2304

/
7

417/

/34
2/
130
/2/7
:7
6
1
41/745
207

341
4987 /
/0=
JKLMNOPQ RSQTUPNVOWXYZ[XM\WN ]^N_`a[ NW
QTUPNVOWXb
297
730

17275
42
04
:8704
/:

/7

70-0
4
:75
4204
:7
704
/:

704
=
JZZLcdeYMNOPQ RSQTUPNVOWXb7/
/1804

C07 704
/7
730

17=

/01
2
10
9

6
1

41;

54

17

54

51/

0341f</

/

17

54

51/

-H
/01
2

54

6
1/7
804
3
1

397

:
6
1
41/;

54
/
/74

1/01

4=7
1/01

4/743

5

397

92
17
0341 f</

=7
1/01

4/74

29
1/0170/:01<0
/:5
4

/2704
/:

<
/:

8<
54
/:
/2
9

0/2

//
194/=7
1/01

4/74
737
0/27
591/015
714/
0

<70/=7

4/74/
C071/011 1

4 7
248
/0
01/0115
/:871
/743

/10

-
12
1; >
Jg
3/01270-214
/

9214/:017/ 24

/:
04

89
5
15
/

C01 /2

/01
2

6
1

41;

54

17

54

51/

0341f</

/

17

54

51/

!"#$%
&!'#()*+,

-./
0-12

2
13
4
/1
5-
1 6
5 -5
-.
/
0-12

2
15

1
-27--/
2
8 39
/-

7:1--
5

1
-27-
-/
2;

<=
27-
50
520
-7
.

>
-20?71
:
-

:.0

90

1201>1.

5.
2:1

1

0.2-1
/
2
0
2-

5<20
57
-:7

-2.

>
-<1

-2
2

5-1
23
0
/0
12

2/1
27.92

5
:
1?90

5
220
-:757
27-
2:71

5
/

7:1-

/1
27
1 0

1

57
27-
2-2.7

@
/
2
0

<A9
<=BC9

<DBC90

>
-27
.
90

>
-

1-20172
2:1
52
.0

1-:
520

7
123
0
27
.201:
/?

/

:.0

15
2

23
201-7

520
-:72

1

/

7:1-

/1
:2

E72

F72-

-8/3

G=B

2F3;
HD
13

5 23GHCA=3D8;
902

9 0
27
.201
-6
0
-2
12
<A9
<=BC9

<DBC
5-1
20
:71

/1
1-

.
5
-0

F7

.
E-257-0

/1
2I
520
:1230
5 27
.2012:
-
1?0
/

G=BH8;
.0

1-:

/25
1?30
27
.2012
50
1
0
1/-
5

1 50
-

2-

?0
27 .
0
E0
-2

-

0
5 27
.

3

0
/0
27 .02:

9
>
-
1-20172

2:1
52
.0
520
7
123
5 12
-02
-

>
-
1-I2520

.
9
12
201
.0

.
0
5

:.
12

7
:.0

12
27150
520
527
.3
1201.-

0
520

.
50
520

27-
50

52-7
.

.5

-0

-0

/1

/-2

7:1-J@2

2

-0

/1

/-2

!"!#$%&'( )*"+,-
.
/0
12/3
4
5
6
.782.9
1/.2

2 2
./305

/ 0

:
47
5/2 4
5
2./2
. /0
172

:
4
54/259
.02
354
5182 /
/0

!"#$% &!'#()*+,-./,0!"#/12 /)!&3#425&!1+6
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
July 2023
Appendix B Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix A:

Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy
Supporting Documentation
Assumptions Worksheet

Name: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project Project Number: COLB-09.5
Project Location: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CA 90803 County: Los Angeles County
Climate Zone: 9
Land Use Setting: Urban
Operational Year: 2027
Utility Company: Southern California Edison, Long Beach Gas & Oil Air Basin: South Coast Air Basin
Air District: South Coast AQMD
South Coast AQMD SRA: 4
Project Site Acreage 5.80
Disturbed Site Acreage 4.09
Project Components Building SQFT CY or Tons
Demolition
Building Demolition (CY) 61,184 1,097
Asphalt Demolition (Tons) 94,752 1,404
Gross SQFT Footprint (SQFT) Acres Stories
Construction
Apartments Mid Rise1 331,312 71,064 1.63 6
Health Club2 6,586 0 0.00
General Office Building3 5,899 0 0.00
Strip Mall4 5,351 5,351 0.12
Onsite Surface Work Gross SQFT Acres Stalls Stories
Enclosed Parking Structure with Elevator 35,481 0.81 572 6 Landscaping5 24,619 0.57
Hardscape6 41,566 0.95
Notes:
1 2 Health Club land use represents the proposed residential fitness space and clubroom. 3 4 Strip Mall represents the proposed retail space.
5 Includes public open space.
6 Includes private open space/balconies and common open space for residential use (roof pool deck and two courtyards) CalEEMod Inputs - 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project, Construction The Apartments Mid Rise land use includes the fitness, clubroom, amenity, leasing office, mail room, and lobby concierge footprint; Exclude Parking, Retail and Private Balconies. All other land use building footprints are therefore zero.

General Office Building land use represents the proposed amenity space including a lobby/concierge, mail lounge, leasing office, and amenity space.

CalEEMod Land Use Inputs
Land Use Type Land Use Subtype Unit Amount Size Metric Lot Acreage Building
Square Feet
Landscape
Area Square
Feet
Special
Landscape
Area Square
Feet
Residential Apartments Mid Rise 390 DUs 1000 sqft 2.20 331,312 24,619 0.00 Recreational Health Club 6.59 1000 sqft 0 6,586 0.00 0.00 Commcercial General Office Building 5.90 1000 sqft 0 5,899 0.00 0.00 Retail Strip Mall 5.35 1000 sqft 0.12 5,351 0.00 0.00
Parking
Enclosed Parking Structure with
Elevator 35.48 1000 sqft 0.81 35,481 0.00 0.00
Parking Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 41.57 1000 sqft 0.95 41,566 0.00 0.00 Total 4.09 426,195 24,619
Demolition
Component Amount to be Demolished
Haul Truck
Capacity2
Haul Distance
(miles)2 Total Trip Ends
Duration
(days)
Trip Ends
Per Day
Building (CY)1 1,097 16 40 140 3 47
Total 1,097 140
Notes:
1 Assuming 2,266 tons of building demo debris would be recycled/reprocessed onsite. 2 Haul truck capacity and trip distance provided by Applicant.

Soil Haul
Construction Activities Volume (CY)
Haul Truck
Capacity (CY)1
Haul Distance
(miles)1 Total Trip Ends Total Days
Trip
Ends/Day
Site Preparation (import) 4,700 10 10 940 5 188
Site Preparation (export) 4,000 10 40 800 5 160
Rough Grading (import) 12,400 10 10 2480 6 413
Rough Grading (export) 15,400 10 40 3080 6 513
Fine Grading (export) 4,300 10 40 860 10 86
Total 40,800 1361
Notes:
1 Haul truck capacity and trip distance provided by Applicant.

Architectural Coating
Percent Painted
Interior Painted: 100%
Exterior Painted: 100%
CalEEMod Default: Residential Grams per Liter (g/L)
Interior Paint VOC content: 50 See MM AQ-3
Exterior Paing VOC content: 50 See MM AQ-3
CalEEMod Default: Non-Residential Grams per Liter (g/L) Interior Paint VOC content: 100 See MM AQ-3
Exterior Paing VOC content: 100 See MM AQ-3
CalEEMod Default: Parking Grams per Liter (g/L)
Interior Paint VOC content: -
Exterior Paing VOC content: 100
Structures Land Use Square Feet CalEEMod Factor2
Total Paintable
Surface Area
Paintable
Interior Area1
Paintable
Exterior Area1
Non-Residential Structures
Health Club 6,586 2.0 13,172 - -
General Office Space 5,899 2.0 11,798 - -
Strip Mall 5,351 2.0 10,702 - -
28,348 9,094
Residential Structures
Apartments Mid Rise 331,312 2.7 894,542 670,907 223,636 670,907 223,636
Parking3,4
Other Asphalt Surfaces 41,566 6% 2,494 - 2,494
Enclosed Parking Structure with Elevator 35,481 6% 2,129 1,916 213 Parking Area 4,623
Notes:
1 2
3 4

MITIGATION MEASURES
SEASP EIR MM AQ-1
Equipment Tier
Tier 4 Equipment 50 hp and above
SEASP EIR MM AQ-2
Water Exposed Area
Frequency: 3 per day
PM10: 74 % Reduction
PM2.5: 74 % Reduction
Roadway Dust
Unpaved Vehicle Speed: 25 mph
Clean Paved Road: 9 % PM Reduction
SEASP EIR MM AQ-3
Supercompliant Paint 10 grams/Liter (g/L)
CalEEMod assumes Parking Structures are painted. CalEEMod assumes 90% for interior surfaces and 10% for the exterior shell.

The program assumes the total surface for painting equals 2.7 times the floor square footage for residential and 2 times that for nonresidential square footage defined by the user. In addition, for non-residential land uses, CalEEMod also adds 0.05 times the lot acreage (converted to square feet) for parking land use types (i.e., 5%).

CalEEMod methodology calculates the paintable interior and exterior areas by multiplying the total paintable surface area by 75 and 25 percent, respectively.

Assumes that all parking and non-parking asphalt will be striped. CalEEMod methodology assumes 6% of the parking lot would be painted for striping.

Pavement Volume to Weight Conversion
Component
Total SF of
Area1
Assumed
Thickness
(foot)2
Debris Volume
(cu. ft)
Weight of
Crushed
Asphalt
(lbs/cf)3
AC Mass
(lbs) AC Mass (tons)
Asphalt Demolition 94,752 0.333 31,584 89 2,807,467 1403.73 Total 94,752 1,404 1 Based on aerial image of existing project site. 2 Pavements and Surface Materials. Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials, Technical Paper Number 8. University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension System, 1999. 3 CalRecycle. 2019. Solid Waste Cleanup Program Weights and Volumes for Project Estimates. https://www.delmar.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/5668/CalRecycle-ConversionTable Building Demolition Haul Trip Calculation
Conversion factors*

0.046 ton/SF Building Debris

2.0 CY/ton Building Debris

1.2641662 tons/CY Soil
20 tons Truck Capacity in tons
16 CY Truck Capacity in CY

0.791035229 CY/ton Soil
Building BSF Demo Tons/SF Tons
CY of Building
Materials Haul Truck (CY) Round Trips Total Trip Ends
Office Building Demolition 61,184 0.046 548 1097 16 70 140 Notes:
1 CalEEMod User's Guide Version 2022, Appendix C
2 Assuming 2,266 tons of building demo debris would be recycled/reprocessed onsite.

Construction Activities and Schedule Assumptions
Construction Activities Phase Type Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Duration
(Workday)
Utility Relocation Trenching Trenching 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22 Building Demolition Demolition 12/1/2023 1/7/2024 26
Building Demo Debris Haul (if applicable) Demolition 12/20/2023 12/24/2023 3 Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) Demolition 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Asphalt Demolition Demolition 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10
Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) Demolition 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading Grading 1/14/2024 2/14/2024 23
Rough Grading Soil Haul (if applicable) Grading 2/7/2024 2/14/2024 6 Fine Grading Grading 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Fine Grading Soil Haul (if applicable) Grading 4/1/2024 4/14/2024 10 Building Construction Building Construction 6/1/2024 1/31/2027 695 Utility Trenching Trenching 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Architectural Coating (e.g., buildings, surface lots) Architectural Coating 12/1/2025 9/1/2026 197 Asphalt/Concrete Paving Paving 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Finishing/Landscaping Trenching 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Construction Activities Start Date End Date
CalEEMod
Duration
(Workday)
Utility Relocation Trenching 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22
Building Demolition 12/1/2023 12/9/2023 6
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10
Site Preparation 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 1/15/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 6/1/2024 11/30/2025 390
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Building Construction and Architectural Coating 1/2/2026 4/30/2026 85 Building Construction, Architectural Coating,
Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping 5/1/2026 9/1/2026 88 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping 9/2/2026 1/14/2027 97
Building Construction 1/15/2027 1/31/2027 11
Construction Schedule
Overlapping Construction Schedule (CalEEMod)
CalEEMod Construction Off-Road Equipment Inputs
Equipment # of Equipment hr/day total trips per day
On-Site Water Truck
Travel Distance
(miles/day)
Utility Trenching Relocation2,3
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Worker Trips 5
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 0.50 4 0.41
Building Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Excavators 3 8
Worker Trips 15
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 47
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 1.00 6 0.83
Building Demolition Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling3 Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8
Worker Trips 3
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Asphalt Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Excavators 3 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Worker Trips 15
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 1.00 6 0.83
Asphalt Demolition Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling3
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8
Worker Trips 3
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8
Worker Trips 18
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 348
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 3.5 18 2.89
Construction Equipment Details1
Rough Grading
Excavators 1 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Worker Trips 15
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 927
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 2.50 14 2.06
Fine Grading
Excavators 1 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8
Worker Trips 15
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 86
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 2.50 14 2.06
Building Construction
Cranes 1 7
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7
Welders 1 8
Worker Trips 302
Vendor Trips 50
Hauling Trips 0
Utility Trenching3
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Worker Trips 5
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 0.50 4
Paving
Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6
Pavers 1 8
Paving Equipment 2 6
Rollers 2 6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Worker Trips 20
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6
Worker Trips 60
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Finishing and Landscaping3
Forklifts 1 8
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8
Worker Trips 5
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips 0
Notes:
1 PDF AQ-1 requires use of Tier 4 construction equipment for equipment that is 50 horsepower and higher. 2 Assume same equipment mix as Utility Trenching phase. 3 Equipment mix provided by Applicant.

Water Truck Vendor Trip Calculation
Amount of Water
(gal/acre/day)1
Water Truck Capacity
(gallons)2
10,000 4,000
Notes:
1 Based on data provided in Guidance for Application for Dust Control Permit 2 Based on standard water truck capacity:
3 Maricopa County Air Quality Department. 2005, June. Guidance for Application of Dust Control Permit. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019- McLellan Industries. 2022, January (access). Water Trucks. https://www.mclellanindustries.com/trucks/water-trucks/ Assumes that dozers, tractors/loaders/backhoes, and graders can disturb 0.50 acres per day and scrapers can disturb 1 acre per day.

Phase Name
Worker Trip
Ends Per
Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per
Day
Total Haul
Truck Trip
Ends
Start Date End Date Workdays
Utility Relocation Trenching 5 4 0 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22 Building Demolition 15 6 47 12/1/2023 1/7/2024 26
Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) 3 0 0 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Asphalt Demolition 15 6 0 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10
Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) 3 0 0 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Site Preparation 18 18 348 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 15 14 927 1/14/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 15 14 86 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 302 50 0 6/1/2024 1/31/2027 695
Utility Trenching 5 4 0 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Architectural Coating (e.g., buildings, surface lots) 60 0 0 12/1/2025 9/1/2026 197 Asphalt/Concrete Paving 20 0 0 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Finishing/Landscaping 5 0 0 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Construction Activity (Overlapping)
Worker Trip
Ends Per
Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per
Day
Total Trip
Ends Per
Day
Start Date End Date Workdays
Utility Relocation Trenching 5 4 0 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22 Building Demolition 15 6 47 12/1/2023 12/9/2023 6
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition 30 12 47 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling
21 6 47
12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10
Site Preparation 18 18 348 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 15 14 927 1/15/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 15 14 86 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 302 50 0 6/1/2024 11/30/2025 390
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating
367 54 0
12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Building Construction and Architectural Coating 362 50 0 1/2/2026 4/30/2026 85 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping
387 50 0
5/1/2026 9/1/2026 88
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping 327 50 0 9/2/2026 1/14/2027 97
Building Construction 302 50 0 1/15/2027 1/31/2027 11
Maximum Daily Trips 387 54 927
Name: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project, Roadway Improvements Construction Project Number: COLB-09.5
Project Location: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CA 90803 County: Los Angeles County
Climate Zone: 9
Land Use Setting: Urban
Operational Year: 2027
Utility Company: Southern California Edison, Long Beach Gas & Oil Air Basin: South Coast Air Basin
Air District: South Coast AQMD
South Coast AQMD SRA: 4
Project Site Acreage 5.80
Disturbed Site Acreage 1.71
CalEEMod Land Use Inputs
Land Use Type Land Use Subtype Unit Amount (mile) Size Metric Lot Acreage Land Use SQFT Linear Road Widening 0.09 1000 sqft 1.71 NA
Total 1.71 NA
Notes:
1 Google Earth estimate.

Predominant Soil/Site Type: Sand Gravel

MITIGATION MEASURES
SEASP EIR MM AQ-1
Equipment Tier
Tier 4 Equipment 50 hp and above
SEASP EIR MM AQ-2
Water Exposed Area
Frequency: 3 per day
PM10: 74 % Reduction
PM2.5: 74 % Reduction
CalEEMod Inputs - 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project, Roadway Improvements Construction
Linear Construction Workdays: 183
Construction Activities Start Date End Date
CalEEMod Duration
(Workday)
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18
Linear, Grading & Excavation 5/27/2026 9/6/2026 73
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 65 Linear, Paving 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27
Notes:
1 Construction phasing based on CalEEMod defaults.

Construction Activities and Schedule Assumptions: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace MixedUse Project, Roadway Improvements Construction Construction Schedule
Equipment mix based on 2022.1.12v CalEEMod defaults and Sacramento Metropolitant Roadway Model General Construction Hours: btwn 7:00 AM to 4:00 PM (with 1 hr break), Mon-Fri Construction Equipment Details
CalEEMod default equipment # of Equipment hr/day hp total trips/Day On-Site Water
Truck Travel
Distance
(miles/day)
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing
Crawler Tractors 1 8 87
Excavators 2 8 36
Signal Boards 0 8 6
Worker Trips 8
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 0.5 4 0.41
Linear, Grading and Excavation
Crawler Tractors 1 8 87
Excavators 3 8 36
Graders 2 8 148
Rollers 2 8 36
Rubber Tired Loaders 1 8 150
Scrapers 2 8 423
Signal Boards 0 8 6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 84
Worker Trips 38
Vendor Trips 1
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 3.5 18 2.89
CalEEMod Construction Off-Road Equipment Inputs: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project, Roadway Improvements Construction
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Air Compressors 1 8 37
Generator Sets 1 8 14
Graders 1 8 148
Plate Compactors 1 8 8
Pumps 1 8 11
Rough Terrain Forklifts 1 8 96
Scrapers 1 8 423
Signal Boards 0 8 6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 84
Worker Trips 25
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Water Trucks Acres Disturbed: 1.5 18 1.24
Linear, Paving
Pavers 1 8 81
Paving Equipment 1 8 89
Rollers 2 8 36
Signal Boards 0 8 6
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 84
Worker Trips 18
Vendor Trips 0
Hauling Trips (TOTAL TRIPS) 0
Notes:
1 Water Truck Vendor Trip Calculation
Amount of Water
(gal/acre/day)1
Water Truck Capacity
(gallons)2
10,000 4,000
Notes:
1 2
3 Assumes that dozers, tractors/loaders/backhoes, and graders can disturb 0.50 acres per day and scrapers can disturb 1 acre per day.

Maricopa County Air Quality Department. 2005, June. Guidance for Application of Dust Control Permit. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-
04/documents/mr_guidanceforapplicationfordustcontrolpermit.pdf) Based on standard water truck capacity:

McLellan Industries. 2022, January (access). Water Trucks. https://www.mclellanindustries.com/trucks/watertrucks/ Based on data provided in Guidance for Application for Dust Control Permit PDF AQ-1 requires use of Tier 4 construction equipment for equipment that is 50 horsepower and higher.

Construction Trips Worksheet : Roadway Improvements
Phase Name
Worker Trip
Ends Per Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per Day
Haul Truck
Trip Ends Start Date End Date Workdays
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 8 4 0 5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18 Linear, Grading & Excavation 38 19 0 5/27/2026 9/6/2026 73 Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 25 18 0 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 65 Linear, Paving 18 0 0 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27
Construction Trips Worksheet: Combined
Phase Name
Worker Trip
Ends Per
Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per
Day
Total Haul
Truck Trip
Ends
Start Date End Date Workdays
Utility Relocation Trenching 5 4 0 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22 Building Demolition 15 6 47 12/1/2023 1/7/2024 26
Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) 3 0 0 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Asphalt Demolition 15 6 0 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10
Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (if applicable) 3 0 0 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10 Site Preparation 18 18 348 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 15 14 927 1/14/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 15 14 86 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 302 50 0 6/1/2024 1/31/2027 695
Utility Trenching 5 4 0 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Architectural Coating (e.g., buildings, surface lots) 60 0 0 12/1/2025 9/1/2026 197 Asphalt/Concrete Paving 20 0 0 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Finishing/Landscaping 5 0 0 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 185
Phase Name
Worker Trip
Ends Per
Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per
Day
Total Haul
Truck Trip
Ends Start Date End Date Workdays
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 8 4 0 5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18 Linear, Grading & Excavation 38 19 0 5/27/2026 9/6/2026 73 Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 25 18 0 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 45 Linear, Paving 18 0 0 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27
Construction Activity (Overlapping)
Worker Trip
Ends Per
Day
Vendor Trip
Ends Per
Day
Total Trip
Ends Per
Day
Start Date End Date Workdays
Utility Relocation Trenching 5 4 0 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22 Building Demolition 15 6 47 12/1/2023 12/9/2023 6
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition 30 12 47 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling
21 6 47
12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10
Site Preparation 18 18 348 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 15 14 927 1/15/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 15 14 86 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 302 50 0 6/1/2024 11/30/2025 390
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating 367 54 0 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24 Building Construction and Architectural Coating 362 50 0 1/2/2026 4/30/2026 85 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 395 54 0
5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18
Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation 425 69 0
5/27/2026 9/1/2026 70
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grubbing & Excavation 365 69 0 9/2/2026 9/6/2026 3 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Drainage, Utilities & Sub-Grade 352 68 0 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 65 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear & Paving
345 50 0
12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping
327 50 0
1/13/2027 1/14/2027 2
Building Construction 302 50 0 1/15/2027 1/31/2027 11
Maximum Daily Trips 425 69 927
Mixed-Use Development
Roadway Improvements
Construction Activities Start Date End Date
CalEEMod Duration
(Workday)
Utility Relocation Trenching 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 22
Building Demolition 12/1/2023 12/9/2023 6
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 10 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 10
Site Preparation 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5
Rough Grading 1/15/2024 2/14/2024 23
Fine Grading 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 22
Building Construction 6/1/2024 11/30/2025 390
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 24
Building Construction and Architectural Coating 1/2/2026 4/30/2026 85 Building Construction, Architectural Coating,
Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18
Building Construction, Architectural Coating,
Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation 5/27/2026 9/1/2026 70
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation 9/2/2026 9/6/2026 3 Construction Activities Start Date End Date CalEEMod Duration
(Workday)
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & SubGrade 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 65 Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 5/1/2026 5/26/2026 18 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear and Paving 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27 Linear, Grading & Excavation 5/27/2026 9/6/2026 73 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping 1/13/2027 1/14/2027 2 Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 9/7/2026 12/5/2026 65 Building Construction 1/15/2027 1/31/2027 11 Linear, Paving 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 27 Overlapping Construction Schedule (CalEEMod)
Roadway Improvements Construction Schedule
updated 3/29
Name: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project Project Number: COLB-09.5
Project Location: 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, CA 90803 County: Los Angeles County
Climate Zone: 9
Land Use Setting: Urban
Operational Year: 2027
Utility Company: Southern California Edison (electricity), Long Beach Gas & Oil (natural gas) Air Basin: South Coast Air Basin
Air District: South Coast AQMD
South Coast AQMD SRA: 4
Project Site Acreage 5.80
Disturbed Site Acreage 5.80
CalEEMod Land Use Inputs
Land Use Type Land Use Subtype Unit Amount Size Metric Lot Acreage Building Square Feet Landscape Area Square
Feet
Special
Landscape Area
Square Feet
Residential Apartments Mid Rise 390 1000 sqft 2.20 331,312 24,619 0 Recreational Health Club 6.59 1000 sqft 0.00 6,586 0 0
Commcercial General Office Building 5.90 1000 sqft 0.00 5,899 0 0 Retail Strip Mall 5.35 1000 sqft 0.12 5,351 0 0
Parking
Enclosed Parking Structure with
Elevator 35.48 1000 sqft 0.81 35,481 0 0
Parking Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 41.57 1000 sqft 0.95 41,566 0 0 Linear Road Widening 0.09 1000 sqft 1.71 NA 0 0
Total 5.80 426,195 24,619
CalEEMod Inputs - 6615 East Pacific Coast Highway - Marketplace Mixed-Use Project, Operation Net Trips
Land Use Type Average Net Daily Trips
Weekday CalEEMod Trip
Rate Saturday Trips
Saturday CalEEMod Trip
Rate Sunday Trips
Sunday CalEEMod Trip
Rate
Apartments Mid Rise 1,381 3.54 1,381 3.54 1,381 3.54
Strip Mall 154 28.78 154 28.78 154 28.78
Total 1,535
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2023
Project Trip Purpose
Primary 100%
Diverted 0%
Passby 0%
Project VMT
VMT 16,613 miles
VMT per trip 10.82 Project
Water Use 1,2
Indoor (gpy) Outdoor (gpy) Total
Apartments Mid Rise 14,536,782 421,998 14,958,780
Strip Mall 396,288 0 396,288
Health Club 389,753 0 389,753
General Office Building 1,048,629 0 1,048,629
Notes
1 Assumes 100% aerobic treatment.
2 CalEEMod defaults used.

Solid Waste 1
Land Use Total Solid Waste (tons/yr)
Apartments Mid Rise 288.29
Strip Mall 5.62
Health Club 57.56
General Office Building 5.49
Notes
1 CalEEMod defaults used.

Fireplaces1
Model assumes apartments would have not have fireplaces or woodstoves.

Land Use Subtype # Wood # Gas # Propane # No Fireplace
Apartments 0 0 0 390
Electricity (Buildings)1
Land Use Subtype
Total Annual Electricity
Consumption (kWh/year)
Total Annual Natural Gas
Consumption (kBTU/year)
Title-24 Electricity Energy
Intensity (kWhr/size/year)*
Title-24 Natural Gas
Energy Intensity
(KBTU/size/year)*
Nontitle-24 Electricity
Energy Intensity
(kWhr/size/year)
Nontitle-24 Natural Gas
Energy Intensity
(KBTU/size/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 1,429,675.30 4,331,668.73 405,220.91 3,774,003.99 1,024,454.39 557,664.74 Strip Mall 52,554.13 32,036.14 41,633.80 7,630.59 10,920.33 24,405.54 Enclosed Parking Garage with Elevator 130,975.68 124,234.29 6,741.39 Health Club 63,177.76 281,893.59 53,892.68 106,123.89 9,285.08 175,769.69 General Office Building 105,121.87 149,518.81 85,062.93 118,431.46 20,058.94 31,087.35 Notes
1 CalEEMod defaults used.

Southern California Edison (SCE) Factors
2027 Forecasted Factors
CO2: 346.20 pounds per megawatt hour
CH4: 0.033 pound per megawatt hour
N2O: 0.004 pound per megawatt hour
Notes:
1 CalEEMod default values.

Architectural Coating
Percent Painted
Interior Painted: 100%
Exterior Painted: 100%
CalEEMod Default: Residential
Interior Paint VOC content: 50 grams per liter
Exterior Paing VOC content: 50 grams per liter
CalEEMod Default: Non-Residential
Interior Paint VOC content: 100 grams per liter
Exterior Paing VOC content: 100 grams per liter
CalEEMod Default: Parking
Interior Paint VOC content: - grams per liter
Exterior Paing VOC content: 100 grams per liter
Structures Land Use Square Feet CalEEMod Factor2 Total Paintable Surface Area Paintable Interior Area1 Paintable Exterior Area1 Non-Residential Structures
Health Club 6,586 2.0 13,172 - -
General Office Space 5,899 2.0 11,798 - -
Strip Mall 5,351 2.0 10,702 - -
28,351 9,095
Residential Structures
Apartments Mid Rise 331,312 2.7 894,542 670,907 223,636 670,907 223,636
Parking3
Other Asphalt Surfaces 41,566 6% 2,494 - 2,494
Enclosed Parking Structure with Elevator 35,481 6% 2,129 1,916 213 4,623
4 CalEEMod assumes Parking Structures are painted. CalEEMod assumes 90% for interior surfaces and 10% for the exterior shell. 1 CalEEMod methodology calculates the paintable interior and exterior areas by multiplying the total paintable surface area by 75 and 25 percent, respectively. 2 The program assumes the total surface for painting equals 2.7 times the floor square footage for residential and 2 times that for nonresidential square footage defined by the user. In addition, for non-residential land uses, CalEEMod also adds 0.05 times the lot acreage (converted to square feet) for parking land use types (i.e., 5%). 3 Assumes that all parking and non-parking asphalt will be striped. CalEEMod methodology assumes 6% of surface area is striped.

CalEEMod Operation Measures
W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures
Apartments Mid Rise,
Health Club, General Office
Building, and Strip Mall:

Toilet: 46 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
13 % Reduction in Flow
Urinal 11 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
12 % Reduction in Flow
Showerhead 5 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
11 % Reduction in Flow
Bathroom Faucet 3 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
30 % Reduction in Flow
Kitchen Faucet 4 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
11 % Reduction in Flow
Dishwashers 2 Fixture % of Total Indoor Water Use
20 % Reduction in Flow
Changes to the CalEEMod Defaults - Fleet Mix 2027 Apartments Mid Rise Trips 1,381
Default HHD LDA LDT1 LDT2 LHD1 LHD2 MCY MDV MH MHD OBUS SBUS UBUS FleetMix (Model Default) 0.8945069 49.328351 4.2329468 24.023497 2.6966944 0.6925358 2.2009006 14.340004 0.2781024 1.1011027 0.0845281 0.0649086 0.0619211 FleetMix (Model Default)
adjusted 0.0089451 0.4932835 0.0423295 0.240235 0.0269669 0.0069254 0.022009 0.1434 0.002781 0.011011 0.0008453 0.0006491 0.0006192 100%
Trips 12 681 58 332 37 10 30 198 4 15 1 1 1 1,381
Percent 80% 6% 14% 100%
without buses/MH 0.008945 0.493284 0.042329 0.240235 0.026967 0.006925 0.022009 0.143400 0.002781 0.011011 0 0.000649 0 100% Percent 80% 6% 14% 100%
Adjusted without buses/MH 0.009174 0.493284 0.042329 0.240235 0.027656 0.007102 0.022572 0.143400 0.002852 0.011293 0.000000 0.000666 0.000000 Percent adjusted 80% 6% 14% 100%
Assumed Mix 97.0% 1.00% 2.00% 100%

0.001562 0.599290 0.051426 0.291861 0.004708 0.001209 0.027422 0.020000 0.000486 0.001922 0.000000 0.000113 0.000000 100% adjusted with Assumed 0.156168 59.929009 5.142607 29.186145 0.470804 0.120907 2.742239 2.000000 0.048553 0.192237 0.000000 0.011332 0.000000 Percent Check: 97% 1% 2%
Trips 2 828 71 403 7 2 38 28 1 3 0 0 0 1,379
1,340 77 28
Fleet mix for the project is modified to reflect a higher proportion of passenger vehicles that the regional VMT. Assumes a mix of approximately 97% passenger vehicles, 2% medium duty trucks, and 1% heavy duty trucks and buses.

CalEEMod Construction Model – MixedUse Building
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
1 / 53
COLB-09.5 Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.7. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.9. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.11. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
2 / 53

3.13. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated

3.15. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.17. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated

3.21. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.23. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.25. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.27. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated

3.29. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.31. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

3.33. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated

3.35. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

3.37. Trenching (2023) - Unmitigated

3.39. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated

3.41. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated

3.43. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated

3.45. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
3 / 53

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

8. User Changes to Default Data
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
4 / 53

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COLB-09.5
Construction Start Date 9/14/2023
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.30
Precipitation (days) 18.4
Location 33.75491247269528, -118.1070306127576
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Long Beach
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4767
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Long Beach Gas & Oil
App Version 2022.1.1.12

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Mid Rise 390 Dwelling Unit 2.20 331,312 24,619 — 1,154 — COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
5 / 53
Health Club 6.59 1000sqft 0.00 6,586 0.00 — — —
General Office
Building

5.90 1000sqft 0.00 5,899 0.00 — — —
Strip Mall 5.35 1000sqft 0.12 5,349 0.00 — — —
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

35.5 1000sqft 0.81 35,481 0.00 — — —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

41.6 1000sqft 0.95 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.02 4.85 20.7 53.5 0.07 0.26 5.50 5.75 0.23 1.48 1.64 — 11,008 11,008 0.47 1.07 22.0 11,173 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 69.6 68.8 143 118 0.67 1.43 33.1 34.4 1.32 10.3 11.7 — 99,669 99,669 5.23 14.6 5.48 104,170 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.35 2.71 13.6 32.2 0.05 0.15 3.62 3.77 0.14 0.96 1.10 — 8,856 8,856 0.43 0.96 8.80 9,161 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
6 / 53
Unmit. 0.43 0.49 2.47 5.87 0.01 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.17 0.20 — 1,466 1,466 0.07 0.16 1.46 1,517

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.34 0.29 3.01 4.40 0.01 0.07 0.10 0.16 0.06 0.02 0.09 — 738 738 0.03 0.02 0.66 747 2024 2.27 1.98 18.2 38.7 0.07 0.16 4.48 4.64 0.16 1.48 1.64 — 9,694 9,694 0.47 1.07 21.2 10,040 2025 2.18 1.91 12.3 36.9 0.03 0.14 4.38 4.52 0.12 1.04 1.16 — 8,174 8,174 0.34 0.39 19.7 8,318 2026 3.02 4.85 20.7 53.5 0.05 0.26 5.50 5.75 0.23 1.31 1.54 — 11,008 11,008 0.45 0.44 22.0 11,173 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 69.6 68.8 27.0 118 0.09 1.43 4.90 6.33 1.13 0.86 1.99 — 11,031 11,031 0.51 0.66 0.27 11,240 2024 69.5 68.8 143 118 0.67 1.41 33.1 34.4 1.32 10.3 11.7 — 99,669 99,669 5.23 14.6 5.48 104,170 2025 2.91 4.74 16.6 42.6 0.04 0.21 5.27 5.48 0.19 1.25 1.44 — 9,610 9,610 0.42 0.45 0.60 9,755 2026 2.66 4.49 19.9 45.3 0.05 0.23 5.27 5.46 0.21 1.25 1.43 — 9,826 9,826 0.42 0.44 0.56 9,960 2027 2.53 2.21 19.7 43.9 0.05 0.21 4.71 4.92 0.20 1.12 1.32 — 9,716 9,716 0.29 0.40 0.46 9,843 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.20 1.17 1.48 3.60 < 0.005 0.04 0.17 0.22 0.04 0.03 0.07 — 590 590 0.03 0.04 0.27 602 2024 2.35 1.94 13.6 21.8 0.05 0.15 3.58 3.73 0.14 0.96 1.10 — 8,856 8,856 0.43 0.96 8.80 9,161 2025 1.59 1.52 9.31 25.3 0.03 0.10 3.15 3.25 0.09 0.75 0.84 — 5,826 5,826 0.25 0.28 6.17 5,922 2026 1.90 2.71 13.1 32.2 0.03 0.15 3.62 3.77 0.14 0.86 1.00 — 7,039 7,039 0.30 0.30 6.40 7,143 2027 0.13 0.12 0.95 2.29 < 0.005 0.01 0.27 0.28 0.01 0.06 0.07 — 527 527 0.02 0.02 0.44 535 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.22 0.21 0.27 0.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.01 — 97.6 97.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 99.7 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
7 / 53
2024 0.43 0.35 2.47 3.98 0.01 0.03 0.65 0.68 0.03 0.17 0.20 — 1,466 1,466 0.07 0.16 1.46 1,517 2025 0.29 0.28 1.70 4.61 < 0.005 0.02 0.57 0.59 0.02 0.14 0.15 — 965 965 0.04 0.05 1.02 980 2026 0.35 0.49 2.38 5.87 0.01 0.03 0.66 0.69 0.03 0.16 0.18 — 1,165 1,165 0.05 0.05 1.06 1,183 2027 0.02 0.02 0.17 0.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 87.3 87.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 88.6

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.85 10.9 18.4 0.03 0.21 — 0.21 0.20 — 0.20 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.29 0.29 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 4.68 4.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.93 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.66 1.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 208 208 0.01 < 0.005 — 209 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.28 0.28 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
8 / 53
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 34.4 34.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.5 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 205 205 0.01 0.01 0.02 208 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.25 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 196 196 0.01 0.03 0.01 205 Hauling 0.27 0.07 4.49 1.65 0.02 0.04 0.89 0.93 0.04 0.24 0.28 — 3,368 3,368 0.20 0.53 0.20 3,532 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.6 12.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.9 11.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 12.4 Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.28 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 204 204 0.01 0.03 0.20 214 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.09 2.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.12 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.97 1.97 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 33.8 33.8 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 35.5

3.3. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
9 / 53
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.81 10.8 18.4 0.03 0.19 — 0.19 0.18 — 0.18 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.29 0.29 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 4.61 4.61 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.85 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.15 0.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 46.9 46.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 47.1 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.77 7.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.79 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
10 / 53
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 0.01 0.01 0.02 203 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 194 194 0.01 0.03 0.01 202 Hauling 0.25 0.07 4.30 1.59 0.02 0.04 0.87 0.91 0.04 0.24 0.28 — 3,315 3,315 0.18 0.53 0.20 3,478 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.79 2.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.83 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.65 2.65 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.77 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.4 45.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.05 47.7 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.47 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.44 0.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.46 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.52 7.52 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.89

3.5. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

34.1 33.9 0.85 48.1 < 0.005 0.59 — 0.59 0.44 — 0.44 — 77.9 77.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 3.11 3.11 — 0.47 0.47 — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
11 / 53
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.53 0.53 0.01 0.75 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1.22 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.22 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.05 0.05 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.20 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.20 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 34.2 34.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 34.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
12 / 53
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

34.1 33.9 0.85 48.1 < 0.005 0.59 — 0.59 0.44 — 0.44 — 77.9 77.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 3.11 3.11 — 0.47 0.47 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.46 0.01 0.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1.07 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.07 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 < 0.005 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
13 / 53
Demolitio — — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.5 33.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.47 0.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.47 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
14 / 53
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.96 0.85 10.9 18.4 0.03 0.21 — 0.21 0.20 — 0.20 — 3,425 3,425 0.14 0.03 — 3,437 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 4.68 4.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.93 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.30 0.50 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 93.8 93.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 94.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.13 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.6 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 205 205 0.01 0.01 0.02 208 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.25 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 — 196 196 0.01 0.03 0.01 205 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
15 / 53
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.71 5.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.78 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.38 5.38 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.61 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.94 0.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.96 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.89 0.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.93 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

34.1 33.9 0.85 48.1 < 0.005 0.59 — 0.59 0.44 — 0.44 — 77.9 77.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.53 0.53 0.01 0.75 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1.22 1.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.22 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
16 / 53
Demolitio — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.20 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.20 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 34.2 34.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 34.6 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
17 / 53

3.13. Demolition (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

34.1 33.9 0.85 48.1 < 0.005 0.59 — 0.59 0.44 — 0.44 — 77.9 77.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 78.2 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.47 0.46 0.01 0.66 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 1.07 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.07 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 < 0.005 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.18 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
18 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 33.5 33.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 33.9 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.47 0.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.47 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.15. Site Preparation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.64 0.64 14.7 28.3 0.05 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 5,296 5,296 0.21 0.04 — 5,314 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
19 / 53
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.13 5.13 — 2.63 2.63 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 — 11.7 11.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 12.3 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.20 0.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 72.5 72.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 72.8 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.17 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.0 12.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.1 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 234 234 0.01 0.01 0.03 237 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.71 0.34 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 581 581 0.02 0.08 0.04 605 Hauling 1.84 0.51 31.9 11.8 0.16 0.31 6.45 6.76 0.31 1.77 2.07 — 24,545 24,545 1.32 3.94 1.46 25,752 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
20 / 53
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.26 3.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.30 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.96 7.96 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.30 Hauling 0.03 0.01 0.44 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 336 336 0.02 0.05 0.33 353 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.54 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.32 1.32 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.37 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 55.7 55.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 58.4

3.17. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.47 10.0 17.8 0.03 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,969 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.86 1.86 — 0.89 0.89 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.73 0.73 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 — 8.84 8.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.29 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.63 1.12 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 186 186 0.01 < 0.005 — 187 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
21 / 53
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.12 0.12 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.56 0.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.0 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 0.01 0.01 0.02 203 Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.55 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 452 452 0.02 0.06 0.03 471 Hauling 4.90 1.35 84.9 31.4 0.43 0.82 17.2 18.0 0.82 4.71 5.52 — 65,382 65,382 3.52 10.5 3.90 68,598 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.8 12.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.0 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.5 28.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 29.7 Hauling 0.31 0.09 5.43 1.97 0.03 0.05 1.07 1.12 0.05 0.29 0.35 — 4,119 4,119 0.22 0.66 4.09 4,326 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.13 2.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.15 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.71 4.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.92 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
22 / 53
Hauling 0.06 0.02 0.99 0.36 < 0.005 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 682 682 0.04 0.11 0.68 716

3.19. Grading (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.47 10.0 17.8 0.03 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,969 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.84 1.84 — 0.89 0.89 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.73 0.73 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 — 8.81 8.81 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 9.28 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.47 10.0 17.8 0.03 0.08 — 0.08 0.08 — 0.08 — 2,958 2,958 0.12 0.02 — 2,969 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 1.84 1.84 — 0.89 0.89 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.73 0.73 < 0.005 0.07 0.07 — 8.84 8.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.29 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.60 1.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
23 / 53
Dust — — — — — — 0.11 0.11 — 0.05 0.05 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.53 0.53 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.56 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.11 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 29.6 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 212 212 0.01 0.01 0.84 215 Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.53 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 452 452 0.02 0.06 1.22 472 Hauling 0.46 0.13 7.59 2.92 0.04 0.08 1.59 1.67 0.08 0.44 0.51 — 6,063 6,063 0.33 0.97 13.9 6,375 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 201 201 0.01 0.01 0.02 203 Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.55 0.27 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.13 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 452 452 0.02 0.06 0.03 471 Hauling 0.46 0.13 7.87 2.91 0.04 0.08 1.59 1.67 0.08 0.44 0.51 — 6,066 6,066 0.33 0.97 0.36 6,364 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.3 12.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 12.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 27.2 27.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.4 Hauling 0.03 0.01 0.48 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 366 366 0.02 0.06 0.36 384 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
24 / 53
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.03 2.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.06 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.51 4.51 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.70 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.09 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 60.5 60.5 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 63.5

3.21. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.64 0.58 9.26 15.0 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.64 0.58 9.26 15.0 0.02 0.12 — 0.12 0.11 — 0.11 — 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02 — 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.24 3.88 6.28 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 1,004 1,004 0.04 0.01 — 1,008 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.04 0.71 1.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 166 166 0.01 < 0.005 — 167 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
25 / 53
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.51 1.36 1.45 22.8 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93 — 4,265 4,265 0.18 0.14 16.8 4,329 Vendor 0.13 0.05 1.91 0.94 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,627 1,627 0.07 0.22 4.41 1,700 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.49 1.34 1.71 19.3 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93 — 4,042 4,042 0.18 0.15 0.44 4,092 Vendor 0.13 0.05 1.99 0.96 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.02 0.12 0.14 — 1,628 1,628 0.07 0.22 0.11 1,696 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.62 0.56 0.71 8.49 0.00 0.00 1.63 1.63 0.00 0.38 0.38 — 1,718 1,718 0.08 0.06 3.04 1,742 Vendor 0.05 0.02 0.84 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.18 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 681 681 0.03 0.09 0.79 711 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.13 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.07 0.07 — 284 284 0.01 0.01 0.50 288 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 113 113 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 118 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.23. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
26 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.56 9.21 15.0 0.02 0.11— 0.11 0.11— 0.11— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.62 0.56 9.21 15.0 0.02 0.11— 0.11 0.11— 0.11— 2,398 2,398 0.10 0.02— 2,406 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.44 0.40 6.58 10.7 0.02 0.08— 0.08 0.08— 0.08— 1,713 1,713 0.07 0.01— 1,719 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 1.20 1.95 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 284 284 0.01 < 0.005— 285 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.45 1.30 1.31 21.0 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93— 4,177 4,177 0.18 0.14 15.3 4,239 Vendor 0.11 0.05 1.82 0.89 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.01 0.12 0.13— 1,600 1,600 0.07 0.22 4.38 1,673 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
27 / 53
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 1.43 1.28 1.45 17.8 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93 — 3,959 3,959 0.18 0.15 0.40 4,008 Vendor 0.11 0.05 1.90 0.90 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.01 0.12 0.13 — 1,601 1,601 0.07 0.22 0.11 1,669 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.02 0.91 1.12 13.4 0.00 0.00 2.79 2.79 0.00 0.65 0.65 — 2,870 2,870 0.13 0.10 4.72 2,908 Vendor 0.08 0.03 1.36 0.64 0.01 0.02 0.31 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09 — 1,143 1,143 0.05 0.16 1.36 1,193 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.19 0.17 0.20 2.44 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 475 475 0.02 0.02 0.78 481 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.25 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 189 189 0.01 0.03 0.22 198 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.25. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.55 9.17 15.0 0.02 0.11 — 0.11 0.10 — 0.10 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
28 / 53
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 0.55 9.17 15.0 0.02 0.11— 0.11 0.10— 0.10— 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02— 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.43 0.39 6.55 10.7 0.02 0.08— 0.08 0.07— 0.07— 1,712 1,712 0.07 0.01— 1,718 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 1.20 1.95 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 283 283 0.01 < 0.005— 284 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite——————————————————
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.26 1.11 1.17 19.5 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93— 4,093 4,093 0.17 0.14 13.8 4,153 Vendor 0.11 0.05 1.73 0.84 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.01 0.12 0.13— 1,572 1,572 0.07 0.22 4.25 1,645 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Worker 1.26 1.11 1.32 16.6 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93— 3,880 3,880 0.18 0.14 0.36 3,927 Vendor 0.11 0.04 1.81 0.86 0.01 0.02 0.43 0.45 0.01 0.12 0.13— 1,573 1,573 0.07 0.22 0.11 1,642 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
——————————————————
Worker 0.89 0.78 1.02 12.4 0.00 0.00 2.79 2.79 0.00 0.65 0.65— 2,812 2,812 0.13 0.10 4.28 2,850 Vendor 0.08 0.03 1.30 0.61 0.01 0.02 0.31 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.09— 1,123 1,123 0.05 0.16 1.31 1,174 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
29 / 53
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.14 0.19 2.27 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.12 0.12 — 466 466 0.02 0.02 0.71 472 Vendor 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 186 186 0.01 0.03 0.22 194 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.27. Building Construction (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.59 0.54 9.13 15.0 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 2,397 2,397 0.10 0.02 — 2,405 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.55 0.91 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 145 145 0.01 < 0.005 — 146 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.2 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
30 / 53
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 1.20 1.05 1.30 15.4 0.00 0.00 3.95 3.95 0.00 0.93 0.93 — 3,806 3,806 0.05 0.14 0.32 3,850 Vendor 0.10 0.04 1.73 0.81 0.01 0.01 0.43 0.44 0.01 0.12 0.13 — 1,543 1,543 0.07 0.21 0.10 1,608 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 234 234 < 0.005 0.01 0.33 237 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 93.6 93.6 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 97.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 38.8 38.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 39.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.5 15.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.29. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.44 6.22 9.35 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,350 1,350 0.05 0.01 — 1,355 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
31 / 53
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.44 6.22 9.35 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,350 1,350 0.05 0.01 — 1,355 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 0.21 2.98 4.48 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 647 647 0.03 0.01 — 649 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.54 0.82 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 107 107 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 108 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.08 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 271 271 0.01 0.01 0.92 275 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
32 / 53
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 257 257 0.01 0.01 0.02 260 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 125 125 0.01 < 0.005 0.19 127 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 20.7 20.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 21.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.31. Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.49 0.43 6.21 9.35 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,350 1,350 0.05 0.01 — 1,355 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
33 / 53
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.17 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 37.0 37.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.1 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.13 6.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.15 Paving — < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 252 252 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 255 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.01 7.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 7.10 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.16 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.17 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
34 / 53

3.33. Architectural Coating (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.13 0.88 1.14 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.10 8.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.13 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.34 1.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.35 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
35 / 53
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.29 0.26 0.29 3.56 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 792 792 0.04 0.03 0.08 802 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 48.7 48.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 49.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.07 8.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.18 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.35. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
36 / 53
Off-Road 0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Equipment
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.15 0.12 0.86 1.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 2.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.41 0.54 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 63.7 63.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.0 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.6 10.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.6 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
37 / 53
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.23 3.90 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 819 819 0.03 0.03 2.77 831 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.25 0.22 0.26 3.33 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.19 0.19 — 776 776 0.04 0.03 0.07 785 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.10 0.14 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 376 376 0.02 0.01 0.57 381 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 62.2 62.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 63.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.37. Trenching (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
38 / 53
Off-Road 0.30 0.26 2.82 3.91 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 535 535 0.02 < 0.005 — 537 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 0.26 2.82 3.91 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 535 535 0.02 < 0.005 — 537 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.17 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.2 32.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.3 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.34 5.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.36 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 72.2 72.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 73.3 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.16 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 0.02 0.35 137 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 68.4 68.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 69.2 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
39 / 53
Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.17 0.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 0.02 0.01 136 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.18 4.18 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.24 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.89 7.89 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.23 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.31 1.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.36 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.39. Trenching (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.27 0.23 2.72 3.88 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.04 — 0.04 — 535 535 0.02 < 0.005 — 537 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.17 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 32.4 32.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 32.6 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
40 / 53
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 65.5 65.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.4 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.15 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 127 127 0.01 0.02 0.01 132 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.03 4.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.09 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.70 7.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 8.04 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.67 0.67 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.68 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.27 1.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.33 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.41. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
41 / 53
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 0.22 2.68 3.86 0.01 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 534 534 0.02 < 0.005 — 536 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.05 1.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.05 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.17 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 64.2 64.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 65.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.14 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 125 125 0.01 0.02 0.01 130 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
42 / 53
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.13 0.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.13 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.24 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.26 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.43. Trenching (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 1.24 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 1.24 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
43 / 53
Off-Road 0.02 0.02 0.60 1.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 146 146 0.01 < 0.005 — 147 Equipment
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 0.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 24.2 24.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.3 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 67.7 67.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.23 68.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 64.2 64.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 65.0 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 31.2 31.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 31.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.17 5.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.24 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
44 / 53

3.45. Trenching (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 0.05 1.24 2.14 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 305 305 0.01 < 0.005 — 306 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.35 8.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.38 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
45 / 53
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 63.0 63.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 63.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.75 1.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.77 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.29 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Building Demolition Demolition 12/1/2023 1/7/2024 5.00 26.0 — Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Demolition 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 5.00 10.0 —
Asphalt Demolition Demolition 12/10/2023 12/23/2023 5.00 10.0 — Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Demolition 12/24/2023 1/7/2024 5.00 10.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/8/2024 1/14/2024 5.00 5.00 — Rough Grading Grading 1/14/2024 2/14/2024 5.00 23.0 —
Fine Grading Grading 3/14/2024 4/14/2024 5.00 22.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 6/1/2024 1/31/2027 5.00 695 — Asphalt/Concrete Paving Paving 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 5.00 185 — COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
46 / 53
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/1/2025 9/1/2026 5.00 197 — Utility Relocation Trenching Trenching 9/14/2023 10/14/2023 5.00 22.0 — Utility Trenching Trenching 12/1/2025 1/1/2026 5.00 24.0 — Finishing and Landscaping Trenching 5/1/2026 1/14/2027 5.00 185 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Building Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Building Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Building Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Crushing/Proc.

Equipment
Gasoline Average 1.00 8.00 12.0 0.85
Asphalt Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Asphalt Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Asphalt Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Crushing/Proc.

Equipment
Gasoline Average 1.00 8.00 12.0 0.85
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Rough Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Rough Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Fine Grading Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
47 / 53
Fine Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 7.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Asphalt/Concrete
Paving
Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 10.0 0.56
Asphalt/Concrete
Paving
Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Asphalt/Concrete
Paving
Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 6.00 89.0 0.36 Asphalt/Concrete
Paving
Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 6.00 36.0 0.38
Asphalt/Concrete
Paving
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48 Utility Relocation
Trenching
Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Utility Relocation
Trenching
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Utility Trenching Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Utility Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Finishing and
Landscaping
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 82.0 0.20
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
48 / 53
Finishing and Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Landscaping

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Utility Relocation Trenching — — — —
Utility Relocation Trenching Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Utility Relocation Trenching Vendor 4.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Utility Relocation Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Utility Relocation Trenching Onsite truck — — HHDT
Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 18.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 348 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 1.00 2.89 HHDT
Rough Grading — — — —
Rough Grading Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Rough Grading Vendor 14.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Rough Grading Hauling 927 20.0 HHDT
Rough Grading Onsite truck 1.00 2.06 HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 302 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 50.4 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Asphalt/Concrete Paving — — — —
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
49 / 53
Asphalt/Concrete Paving Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Asphalt/Concrete Paving Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Asphalt/Concrete Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Asphalt/Concrete Paving Onsite truck—— HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 60.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck—— HHDT
Building Demolition————
Building Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Demolition Vendor 6.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Demolition Hauling 47.0 20.0 HHDT
Building Demolition Onsite truck 1.00 0.83 HHDT
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
————
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Onsite truck—— HHDT
Asphalt Demolition————
Asphalt Demolition Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Asphalt Demolition Vendor 6.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Asphalt Demolition Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Asphalt Demolition Onsite truck 1.00 0.83 HHDT
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
50 / 53
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
————
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Worker 2.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling
Onsite truck—— HHDT
Fine Grading————
Fine Grading Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Fine Grading Vendor 14.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Fine Grading Hauling 86.0 20.0 HHDT
Fine Grading Onsite truck 1.00 2.06 HHDT
Utility Trenching————
Utility Trenching Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Utility Trenching Vendor 4.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Utility Trenching Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Utility Trenching Onsite truck—— HHDT
Finishing and Landscaping————
Finishing and Landscaping Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Finishing and Landscaping Vendor— 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Finishing and Landscaping Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Finishing and Landscaping Onsite truck—— HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
51 / 53
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9% 9%

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 670,907 223,636 28,348 9,094 4,623

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Building Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 548 —
Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling

0.00 0.00 0.00 2,266 —
Asphalt Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling

0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Site Preparation 4,700 4,000 7.50 0.00 —
Rough Grading 12,400 15,400 23.0 0.00 —
Fine Grading — 4,300 22.0 0.00 —
Asphalt/Concrete Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.77

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
52 / 53
Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Health Club 0.00 0%
General Office Building 0.00 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.81 100%
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.95 0%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2025 0.00 349 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 346 0.03 < 0.005

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Based on applicant info., see project description Construction: Construction Phases Based on applicant info., see assumptions file COLB-09.5 Custom Report, 5/12/2023
53 / 53
Construction: Off-Road Equipment PDF-AQ 1 requires use of Tier 4 Interim construction equipment for equipment with 50 HP or greater; equipment mix for onsite processing and recycling, utility trenching phases, and finishing landscaping provided by applicant
Construction: Trips and VMT Included water truck trips as vendor trips and calculated onsite truck trip length, see assumptions file Construction: Architectural Coatings SEASP EIR MM AQ-3 requires supercompliant paint of 10 g/l CalEEMod Construction Model –
Roadway Improvements
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 1 / 29
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2026) - Unmitigated

3.3. Linear, Grading & Excavation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.5. Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Linear, Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.9. Linear, Paving (2027) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 2 / 29

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 3 / 29

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 4 / 29

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 5 / 29

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3
Construction Start Date 5/1/2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.30
Precipitation (days) 18.4
Location 6615 E Pacific Coast Hwy, Long Beach, CA 90803, USA County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Long Beach
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4767
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Long Beach Gas & Oil
App Version 2022.1.1.12

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Road Widening 0.09 Mile 1.71 0.00 0.00 — — —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 6 / 29

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.75 1.61 27.0 48.4 0.07 0.28 2.63 2.91 0.27 0.36 0.63 — 8,724 8,724 0.36 0.16 3.26 8,784 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.08 0.97 15.5 26.2 0.04 0.18 1.33 1.51 0.16 0.21 0.37 — 4,978 4,978 0.20 0.13 0.07 5,020 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.59 0.53 8.70 15.2 0.02 0.10 0.79 0.88 0.09 0.11 0.20 — 2,758 2,758 0.11 0.06 0.52 2,779 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.11 0.10 1.59 2.77 < 0.005 0.02 0.14 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.04 — 457 457 0.02 0.01 0.09 460

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.28 0.24 3.06 4.48 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 632 632 0.03 0.01 — 634 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 3.03 3.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.21 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 8 / 29
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.15 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 31.2 31.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.3 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.15 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.16 5.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.18 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 102 102 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.34 103 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.14 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.04 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 125 125 0.01 0.02 0.34 130 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 9 / 29
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.82 4.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.89 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.15 6.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.43 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.80 0.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.81 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.06 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Linear, Grading & Excavation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.56 1.45 26.2 45.6 0.07 0.28 — 0.28 0.27 — 0.27 — 7,644 7,644 0.31 0.06 — 7,670 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.97 0.97 — 0.10 0.10 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 0.10 0.10 — 11.3 11.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.9 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.31 0.29 5.25 9.13 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 1,529 1,529 0.06 0.01 — 1,534 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 10 / 29
Dust — — — — — — 0.19 0.19 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.20 0.20 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 2.25 2.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.37 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.06 0.05 0.96 1.67 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 253 253 0.01 < 0.005 — 254 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.37 0.37 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.39 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.16 0.14 0.15 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.11 0.11 — 508 508 0.02 0.02 1.72 516 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.62 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 561 561 0.02 0.08 1.52 587 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 97.8 97.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 99.1 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.13 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 112 112 < 0.005 0.02 0.13 117 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 16.4 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 18.6 18.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 19.4 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 11 / 29
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade (2026) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.94 0.86 14.7 24.5 0.04 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 4,089 4,089 0.17 0.03 — 4,103 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.41 0.41 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 5.79 5.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.10 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.94 0.86 14.7 24.5 0.04 0.17 — 0.17 0.16 — 0.16 — 4,089 4,089 0.17 0.03 — 4,103 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.41 0.41 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.44 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 5.82 5.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.12 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.16 0.15 2.58 4.30 0.01 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 717 717 0.03 0.01 — 719 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 12 / 29
Dust — — — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 1.02 1.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.07 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.47 0.79 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 119 119 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 119 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck
< 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.17 0.17 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.10 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 339 339 0.01 0.01 1.15 344 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.62 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 561 561 0.02 0.08 1.52 587 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.10 0.09 0.11 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.08 0.08 — 321 321 0.01 0.01 0.03 325 Vendor 0.04 0.02 0.65 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 561 561 0.02 0.08 0.04 586 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 57.1 57.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 57.9 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.11 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 98.4 98.4 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 103 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 13 / 29
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.46 9.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.59 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.3 16.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 17.0 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Linear, Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.54 0.49 7.78 12.4 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,768 1,768 0.07 0.01 — 1,774 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.02 0.40 0.63 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 90.0 90.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 90.3 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.9 14.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 14 / 29
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 225 225 0.01 0.01 0.02 228 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.6 11.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 11.8 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.92 1.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.95 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Linear, Paving (2027) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.53 0.48 7.77 12.4 0.02 0.10 — 0.10 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,768 1,768 0.07 0.01 — 1,774 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 15 / 29
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.18 0.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 41.5 41.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 41.7 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 220 220 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 223 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.25 5.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 5.32 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.87 0.87 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.88 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 16 / 29

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 17 / 29
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 18 / 29
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Linear, Grubbing & Land
Clearing
Linear, Grubbing & Land
Clearing
5/1/2026 5/26/2026 5.00 18.0 —
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
5/27/2026 9/6/2026 5.00 73.0 —
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
9/7/2026 12/5/2026 5.00 64.0 —
Linear, Paving Linear, Paving 12/6/2026 1/12/2027 5.00 27.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Linear, Grubbing &
Land Clearing
Signal Boards Electric Average 0.00 8.00 6.00 0.82
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 19 / 29
Linear, Grubbing &
Land Clearing
Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Linear, Grubbing &
Land Clearing
Excavators Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 148 0.41
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Signal Boards Electric Average 0.00 8.00 6.00 0.82
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 423 0.48
Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Rubber Tired Loaders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 150 0.36 Linear, Grading &
Excavation
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 423 0.48
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Signal Boards Electric Average 0.00 8.00 6.00 0.82
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Rough Terrain Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 96.0 0.40 Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Plate Compactors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 8.00 0.43
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Pumps Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 11.0 0.74
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 20 / 29
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48
Linear, Drainage,
Utilities, & Sub-Grade
Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74
Linear, Paving Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Linear, Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Linear, Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Linear, Paving Signal Boards Electric Average 0.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Linear, Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing — — — —
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing Worker 7.50 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing Vendor 4.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing Onsite truck 1.00 0.41 HHDT Linear, Grading & Excavation — — — —
Linear, Grading & Excavation Worker 37.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Linear, Grading & Excavation Vendor 18.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT Linear, Grading & Excavation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Linear, Grading & Excavation Onsite truck 1.00 2.89 HHDT Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade — — — —
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Worker 25.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2 Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Vendor 18.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 21 / 29
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade Onsite truck 1.00 1.24 HHDT Linear, Paving — — — —
Linear, Paving Worker 17.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Linear, Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Linear, Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Linear, Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Sweep paved roads once per month 9% 9%

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (cy) Material Exported (cy) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Linear, Grubbing & Land
Clearing
— — 1.71 0.00 —
Linear, Grading & Excavation — — 1.71 0.00 —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 22 / 29
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade
— — 1.71 0.00 —

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Road Widening 1.71 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2027 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 23 / 29

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 7.09 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.75 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.40 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 24 / 29

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 0 0 N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 0 0 0 N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat 1 1 1 2
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation 1 1 1 2
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 25 / 29
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 22.2
AQ-PM 60.7
AQ-DPM 80.1
Drinking Water 32.0
Lead Risk Housing 16.1
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 95.6
Traffic 70.9
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 71.9
Groundwater 67.2
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 89.3
Impaired Water Bodies 90.1
Solid Waste 81.5
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 6.67
Cardio-vascular 21.0
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 26 / 29
Low Birth Weights —
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 4.21
Housing 3.42
Linguistic 0.00
Poverty 5.80
Unemployment 2.73

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty —
Employed —
Median HI —
Education —
Bachelor's or higher —
High school enrollment —
Preschool enrollment —
Transportation —
Auto Access —
Active commuting —
Social —
2-parent households —
Voting —
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability —
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 27 / 29
Park access —
Retail density —
Supermarket access —
Tree canopy —
Housing —
Homeownership —
Housing habitability —
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden —
Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden —
Uncrowded housing —
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults —
Arthritis 7.9
Asthma ER Admissions 82.1
High Blood Pressure 8.1
Cancer (excluding skin) 2.2
Asthma 86.2
Coronary Heart Disease 8.3
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 50.7
Diagnosed Diabetes 54.0
Life Expectancy at Birth 0.0
Cognitively Disabled 98.4
Physically Disabled 65.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 61.9
Mental Health Not Good 91.8
Chronic Kidney Disease 27.1
Obesity 74.1
COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 28 / 29
Pedestrian Injuries 0.0
Physical Health Not Good 72.6
Stroke 39.4
Health Risk Behaviors —
Binge Drinking 68.3
Current Smoker 92.8
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 92.5
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 19.3
Children 99.4
Elderly 4.8
English Speaking 0.0
Foreign-born 0.0
Outdoor Workers 71.9
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 19.6
Traffic Density 0.0
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 0.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 0.0

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 5.00 COLB-09.5 Roadway Improvements v3 Detailed Report, 5/12/2023 29 / 29
Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) —
Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Construction: Off-Road Equipment SEASP EIR MM AQ-1 requires tier 4 for equipment 50 hp and above Construction: Trips and VMT calculated onsite water trucks as vendor trips and calculated onsite trip length, see assumptions file CalEEMod Operations Model

COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
1 / 25
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
2 / 25

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.2. Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
3 / 25

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.2. Mitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
4 / 25

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name COLB-09.5 OPS
Operational Year 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.30
Precipitation (days) 18.4
Location 33.75502795232626, -118.1073364967678
County Los Angeles-South Coast
City Long Beach
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 4767
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Long Beach Gas & Oil
App Version 2022.1.1.13

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Apartments Mid Rise 390 Dwelling Unit 2.20 331,312 24,619 — 1,154 — COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
5 / 25
Health Club 6.59 1000sqft 0.00 6,586 0.00 — — —
General Office
Building

5.90 1000sqft 0.00 5,899 0.00 — — —
Strip Mall 5.35 1000sqft 0.12 5,351 0.00 — — —
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

35.5 1000sqft 0.81 35,481 0.00 — — —
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

41.6 1000sqft 0.95 0.00 0.00 — — —
Road Widening 0.09 Mile 1.71 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Water W-4 Require Low-Flow Water Fixtures

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 8.24 15.1 4.35 75.3 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.17 0.78 0.95 217 14,673 14,890 19.1 0.42 37.5 15,530 Mit. 8.24 15.1 4.35 75.3 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.17 0.78 0.95 213 14,664 14,877 19.0 0.42 37.5 15,515 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 1% < 0.5% < 0.5% < 0.5% 2% — < 0.5% Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
6 / 25
Unmit. 5.74 12.8 4.46 46.4 0.11 0.16 4.51 4.67 0.15 0.78 0.94 217 14,051 14,268 19.1 0.45 3.36 14,881 Mit. 5.74 12.8 4.46 46.4 0.11 0.16 4.51 4.67 0.15 0.78 0.94 213 14,042 14,255 19.1 0.44 3.36 14,866 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 1% < 0.5% < 0.5% < 0.5% 2% — < 0.5% Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 7.38 14.3 4.65 64.5 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.16 0.78 0.95 217 14,247 14,464 19.1 0.45 17.6 15,092 Mit. 7.38 14.3 4.65 64.5 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.16 0.78 0.95 213 14,238 14,451 19.1 0.44 17.6 15,077 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 1% < 0.5% < 0.5% < 0.5% 2% — < 0.5% Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.35 2.61 0.85 11.8 0.02 0.03 0.82 0.85 0.03 0.14 0.17 35.9 2,359 2,395 3.16 0.07 2.91 2,499 Mit. 1.35 2.61 0.85 11.8 0.02 0.03 0.82 0.85 0.03 0.14 0.17 35.3 2,357 2,393 3.15 0.07 2.91 2,496 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — 1% < 0.5% < 0.5% < 0.5% 2% — < 0.5%

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 5.63 5.13 2.91 50.3 0.11 0.06 4.51 4.57 0.06 0.78 0.84 — 11,270 11,270 0.47 0.32 35.0 11,413 Area 2.46 9.92 0.23 24.5 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 68.7 68.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 68.9 Energy 0.14 0.07 1.22 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 3,226 3,226 0.30 0.02 — 3,241 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 98.3 130 0.12 0.07 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 635 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.45 2.45
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
7 / 25
Total 8.24 15.1 4.35 75.3 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.17 0.78 0.95 213 14,664 14,877 19.0 0.42 37.5 15,515 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 5.60 5.09 3.24 45.8 0.11 0.06 4.51 4.57 0.06 0.78 0.84 — 10,717 10,717 0.49 0.35 0.91 10,833 Area 0.00 7.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Energy 0.14 0.07 1.22 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 3,226 3,226 0.30 0.02 — 3,241 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 98.3 130 0.12 0.07 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 635 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.45 2.45
Total 5.74 12.8 4.46 46.4 0.11 0.16 4.51 4.67 0.15 0.78 0.94 213 14,042 14,255 19.1 0.44 3.36 14,866 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 5.55 5.05 3.28 47.1 0.11 0.06 4.51 4.57 0.06 0.78 0.84 — 10,866 10,866 0.49 0.35 15.1 10,997 Area 1.69 9.19 0.16 16.8 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 47.1 47.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 47.2 Energy 0.14 0.07 1.22 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 3,226 3,226 0.30 0.02 — 3,241 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 98.3 130 0.12 0.07 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 635 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.45 2.45
Total 7.38 14.3 4.65 64.5 0.12 0.17 4.51 4.68 0.16 0.78 0.95 213 14,238 14,451 19.1 0.44 17.6 15,077 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.01 0.92 0.60 8.60 0.02 0.01 0.82 0.83 0.01 0.14 0.15 — 1,799 1,799 0.08 0.06 2.51 1,821 Area 0.31 1.68 0.03 3.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 7.79 7.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.82 Energy 0.03 0.01 0.22 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 534 534 0.05 < 0.005 — 537 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 5.27 16.3 21.5 0.02 0.01 — 25.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 0.00 30.1 3.00 0.00 — 105 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.41 0.41
Total 1.35 2.61 0.85 11.8 0.02 0.03 0.82 0.85 0.03 0.14 0.17 35.3 2,357 2,393 3.15 0.07 2.91 2,496 COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
8 / 25

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

5.06 4.62 2.49 45.3 0.10 0.05 4.04 4.10 0.05 0.70 0.75 — 9,989 9,989 0.41 0.28 31.1 10,112 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall 0.57 0.51 0.42 4.97 0.01 0.01 0.46 0.47 0.01 0.08 0.09 — 1,281 1,281 0.06 0.05 3.94 1,301 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 5.63 5.13 2.91 50.3 0.11 0.06 4.51 4.57 0.06 0.78 0.84 — 11,270 11,270 0.47 0.32 35.0 11,413 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

5.03 4.59 2.79 41.3 0.09 0.05 4.04 4.10 0.05 0.70 0.75 — 9,489 9,489 0.43 0.30 0.81 9,589 COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
9 / 25
Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall 0.56 0.50 0.45 4.53 0.01 0.01 0.46 0.47 0.01 0.08 0.09 — 1,228 1,228 0.06 0.05 0.10 1,244 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 5.60 5.09 3.24 45.8 0.11 0.06 4.51 4.57 0.06 0.78 0.84 — 10,717 10,717 0.49 0.35 0.91 10,833 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.91 0.83 0.51 7.75 0.02 0.01 0.74 0.75 0.01 0.13 0.14 — 1,593 1,593 0.07 0.05 2.22 1,612 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 General
Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Strip Mall 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 206 206 0.01 0.01 0.28 209 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.01 0.92 0.60 8.60 0.02 0.01 0.82 0.83 0.01 0.14 0.15 — 1,799 1,799 0.08 0.06 2.51 1,821

4.2. Energy
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
10 / 25

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,356 1,356 0.13 0.02 — 1,364
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 59.9 59.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 60.3
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 99.7 99.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 100
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 49.8 49.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.1 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 124 124 0.01 < 0.005 — 125
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,690 1,690 0.16 0.02 — 1,700 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,356 1,356 0.13 0.02 — 1,364
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 59.9 59.9 0.01 < 0.005 — 60.3
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
11 / 25
General — — — — — — — — — — — — 99.7 99.7 0.01 < 0.005 — 100 Office
Building
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 49.8 49.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 50.1 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 124 124 0.01 < 0.005 — 125
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,690 1,690 0.16 0.02 — 1,700 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — 225 225 0.02 < 0.005 — 226
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9.92 9.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.98 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 16.5 16.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.6 Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — 8.25 8.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.30 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — — 20.6 20.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.7 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 280 280 0.03 < 0.005 — 281

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
12 / 25
Land TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Use
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.13 0.06 1.09 0.47 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Health
Club

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 90.3 90.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 90.6 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 47.9 47.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 48.1 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 10.3 10.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 10.3 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.14 0.07 1.22 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,537 1,537 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,541 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.13 0.06 1.09 0.47 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.09 — 0.09 — 1,388 1,388 0.12 < 0.005 — 1,392 Health
Club

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.14 0.07 1.22 0.57 0.01 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 1,537 1,537 0.14 < 0.005 — 1,541 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise

0.02 0.01 0.20 0.08 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 230 230 0.02 < 0.005 — 230 Health
Club
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.0 15.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.0 General
Office
Building
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.93 7.93 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.96 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.70 1.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.70 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.03 0.01 0.22 0.10 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 254 254 0.02 < 0.005 — 255

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
14 / 25
Daily,——————————————————
Summer
(Max)
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Consum
er
Products
— 7.48————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.12————————————————
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

2.46 2.32 0.23 24.5 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01— 68.7 68.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 68.9 Total 2.46 9.92 0.23 24.5 < 0.005 0.01— 0.01 0.01— 0.01 0.00 68.7 68.7 < 0.005 < 0.005— 68.9 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Consum
er
Products
— 7.48————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.12————————————————
Total 0.00 7.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Annual——————————————————
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00 Consum
er
Products
— 1.36————————————————
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02————————————————
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
15 / 25
Landsca 0.31 0.29 0.03 3.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.79 7.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.82 pe
Total 0.31 1.68 0.03 3.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 7.79 7.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.82

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 28.3 87.6 116 0.11 0.06 — 137
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.75 2.27 3.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.59 General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.02 6.10 8.12 0.01 < 0.005 — 9.65 Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.76 2.31 3.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.65 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 98.3 130 0.12 0.07 — 154 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
16 / 25
Apartme
Mid Rise
——————————— 28.3 87.6 116 0.11 0.06— 137
Health
Club
——————————— 0.75 2.27 3.02 < 0.005 < 0.005— 3.59
General
Office
Building
——————————— 2.02 6.10 8.12 0.01 < 0.005— 9.65
Strip Mall——————————— 0.76 2.31 3.08 < 0.005 < 0.005— 3.65 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 31.8 98.3 130 0.12 0.07— 154
Annual——————————————————
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
——————————— 4.68 14.5 19.2 0.02 0.01— 22.7
Health
Club
——————————— 0.12 0.38 0.50 < 0.005 < 0.005— 0.59
General
Office
Building
——————————— 0.33 1.01 1.35 < 0.005 < 0.005— 1.60
Strip Mall——————————— 0.13 0.38 0.51 < 0.005 < 0.005— 0.60 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 5.27 16.3 21.5 0.02 0.01— 25.5
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
17 / 25

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 155 0.00 155 15.5 0.00 — 544
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.2 0.00 20.2 2.02 0.00 — 70.8
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.96 0.00 2.96 0.30 0.00 — 10.3
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 3.03 0.00 3.03 0.30 0.00 — 10.6 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 635 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 155 0.00 155 15.5 0.00 — 544
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.2 0.00 20.2 2.02 0.00 — 70.8
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
18 / 25
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.96 0.00 2.96 0.30 0.00 — 10.3
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 3.03 0.00 3.03 0.30 0.00 — 10.6 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 182 0.00 182 18.2 0.00 — 635 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 25.7 0.00 25.7 2.57 0.00 — 90.0
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.35 0.00 3.35 0.33 0.00 — 11.7
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.05 0.00 — 1.71
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.05 0.00 — 1.75 Enclosed
Parking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 0.00 30.1 3.00 0.00 — 105

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.2. Mitigated
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
19 / 25
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.37 2.37
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.45 2.45
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.37 2.37
Health
Club
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2.45 2.45
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartme
nts
Mid Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 0.39
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
20 / 25
Health — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Club
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01 0.01
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.41 0.41

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
21 / 25
Equipme TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e nt
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
22 / 25

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Apartments Mid Rise 1,381 1,381 1,381 503,919 14,938 14,938 14,938 5,452,404 Health Club 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Office
Building

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Strip Mall 154 154 154 56,200 1,666 1,666 1,666 608,086 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
670906.7999999999 223,636 28,351 9,095 4,623

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
23 / 25

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 1,429,675 346 0.0330 0.0040 4,331,669 Health Club 63,178 346 0.0330 0.0040 281,894
General Office Building 105,122 346 0.0330 0.0040 149,519 Strip Mall 52,554 346 0.0330 0.0040 32,036
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 130,976 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 346 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 13,234,286 421,998
Health Club 351,947 0.00
General Office Building 945,339 0.00
Strip Mall 357,848 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
24 / 25
Apartments Mid Rise 288 —
Health Club 37.6 —
General Office Building 5.49 —
Strip Mall 5.62 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Health Club Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Health Club Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Household refrigerators
and/or freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.02 0.60 0.00 1.00
General Office Building Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refrigerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0
COLB-09.5 OPS Custom Report, 5/20/2023
25 / 25

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Based on PD
Operations: Vehicle Data Based on traffic study, adjusted trip length based on traffic study Operations: Fleet Mix See fleet mix adjustment in assumptions file Operations: Hearths assume no fireplaces or woodstoves
Operations: Water and Waste Water assume 100% aerobic treatment Operations: Architectural Coatings SEASP PEIR MM AQ-3 requires supercompliant pain 10 g/l Emissions Worksheet

Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet - Unmitigated:

3.1 Building Demolition (2023)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 10.90 18.40 0.03 0.21 0.20
Demolition 0.29 0.04
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 0.86 10.92 18.41 0.04 0.79 0.27
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.20 0.05
Vendor 0.01 0.25 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.02
Hauling 0.07 4.49 1.65 0.02 0.93 0.28
Total 0.15 4.83 2.81 0.03 1.18 0.35
TOTAL 1.01 15.75 21.22 0.06 1.97 0.62

3.3 Building Demolition (2024)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.81 10.80 18.40 0.03 0.19 0.18
Demolition 0.29 0.04
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 0.82 10.82 18.41 0.04 0.77 0.25
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.20 0.05
Vendor 0.01 0.24 0.11 0.01 0.05 0.02
Hauling 0.07 4.30 1.59 0.02 0.91 0.28
Total 0.15 4.62 2.66 0.03 1.16 0.35
TOTAL 0.97 15.44 21.07 0.06 1.93 0.60

3.5 Building Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2023) ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Demolition 3.11 0.47
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 3.70 0.91
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01
TOTAL 33.91 0.87 48.27 0.01 3.73 0.92

3.7 Building Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2024) ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Demolition 3.11 0.47
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 3.70 0.91
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.01
TOTAL 33.91 0.86 48.26 0.01 3.73 0.92

3.9 Asphalt Demolition (2023)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 10.90 18.40 0.03 0.21 0.20
Demolition 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 0.86 10.92 18.41 0.04 0.50 0.23
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.09 1.04 0.00 0.20 0.05
Vendor 0.01 0.25 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.02
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.08 0.34 1.16 0.01 0.25 0.07
TOTAL 0.94 11.26 19.57 0.04 0.75 0.30

3.11 Asphalt Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2023) ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.00 0.03 0.01
TOTAL 33.91 0.87 48.27 0.01 0.62 0.45

3.13 Asphalt Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2024) ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 33.90 0.85 48.10 0.01 0.59 0.44
Offsite
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.01
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.01 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.01
TOTAL 33.91 0.86 48.26 0.01 0.62 0.45

3.15 Site Preparation (2024)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.64 14.70 28.30 0.05 0.10 0.10
Dust from Material Movement 5.13 2.63
Onsite truck 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.01 1.02 0.10
Total 0.65 14.73 28.31 0.06 6.25 2.83
Offsite
Worker 0.08 0.10 1.12 0.00 0.23 0.05
Vendor 0.02 0.71 0.34 0.01 0.16 0.05
Hauling 0.51 31.90 11.80 0.16 6.76 2.07
Total 0.61 32.71 13.26 0.17 7.15 2.17
TOTAL 1.26 47.44 41.57 0.22 13.40 5.00

3.17 Rough Grading (2024)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.47 10.00 17.80 0.03 0.08 0.08
Dust from Material Movement 1.86 0.89
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.73 0.07
Total 0.48 10.02 17.81 0.04 2.67 1.04
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.20 0.05
Vendor 0.01 0.55 0.27 0.01 0.13 0.04
Hauling 1.35 84.90 31.40 0.43 18.00 5.52
Total 1.43 85.53 32.63 0.44 18.33 5.61
TOTAL 1.91 95.55 50.44 0.47 21.00 6.65

3.19 Fine Grading (2024)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.47 10.00 17.80 0.03 0.08 0.08
Dust from Material Movement 1.84 0.89
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.73 0.07
Total 0.48 10.02 17.81 0.04 2.65 1.04
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.07 1.13 0.00 0.20 0.05
Vendor 0.01 0.53 0.26 0.01 0.13 0.04
Hauling 0.13 7.59 2.92 0.04 1.67 0.51
Total 0.21 8.19 4.31 0.05 2.00 0.60
TOTAL 0.69 18.21 22.12 0.08 4.65 1.64

3.21 Building Construction (2024)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.58 9.26 15.00 0.02 0.12 0.11
Total 0.58 9.26 15.00 0.02 0.12 0.11
Offsite
Worker 1.36 1.45 22.80 0.00 3.95 0.93
Vendor 0.05 1.91 0.94 0.01 0.45 0.14
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.41 3.36 23.74 0.01 4.40 1.07
TOTAL 1.99 12.62 38.74 0.03 4.52 1.18

3.23 Building Construction (2025)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.56 9.21 15.00 0.02 0.11 0.11
Total 0.56 9.21 15.00 0.02 0.11 0.11
Offsite
Worker 1.30 1.31 21.00 0.00 3.95 0.93
Vendor 0.05 1.82 0.89 0.01 0.45 0.13
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.35 3.13 21.89 0.01 4.40 1.06
TOTAL 1.91 12.34 36.89 0.03 4.51 1.17

3.25 Building Construction (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.55 9.17 15.00 0.02 0.11 0.10
Total 0.55 9.17 15.00 0.02 0.11 0.10
Offsite
Worker 1.11 1.17 19.50 0.00 3.95 0.93
Vendor 0.05 1.73 0.84 0.01 0.45 0.13
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.16 2.90 20.34 0.01 4.40 1.06
TOTAL 1.71 12.07 35.34 0.03 4.51 1.16

3.27 Building Construction (2027)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.54 9.13 15.00 0.02 0.10 0.09
Total 0.54 9.13 15.00 0.02 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker 1.05 1.30 15.40 0.00 3.95 0.93
Vendor 0.04 1.73 0.81 0.01 0.44 0.13
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1.09 3.03 16.21 0.01 4.39 1.06
TOTAL 1.63 12.16 31.21 0.03 4.49 1.15

3.29 Paving (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.44 6.22 9.35 0.01 0.10 0.09
Paving 0.01
Total 0.45 6.22 9.35 0.01 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.08 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.06
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.07 0.08 1.29 0.00 0.26 0.06
TOTAL 0.52 6.30 10.64 0.01 0.36 0.15

3.31 Paving (2027)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.43 6.21 9.35 0.01 0.10 0.09
Paving 0.01
Total 0.44 6.21 9.35 0.01 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker 0.07 0.09 1.02 0.00 0.26 0.06
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.07 0.09 1.02 0.00 0.26 0.06
TOTAL 0.51 6.30 10.37 0.01 0.36 0.15

3.33 Architectural Coating (2025)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.13 0.88 1.14 0.01 0.03 0.03
Architectural Coating 2.2
Total 2.33 0.88 1.14 0.01 0.03 0.03
Offsite
Worker 0.26 0.29 3.56 0.00 0.79 0.19
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.26 0.29 3.56 0.00 0.79 0.19
TOTAL 2.59 1.17 4.70 0.01 0.82 0.22

3.35 Architectural Coating (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.12 0.86 1.13 0.01 0.02 0.02
Architectural Coating 2.2
Total 2.32 0.86 1.13 0.01 0.02 0.02
Offsite
Worker 0.22 0.23 3.90 0.00 0.79 0.19
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.22 0.23 3.90 0.00 0.79 0.19
TOTAL 2.54 1.09 5.03 0.01 0.81 0.21

3.37 Utility Relocation Trenching (2023)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.26 2.82 3.91 0.01 0.06 0.06
Total 0.26 2.82 3.91 0.01 0.06 0.06
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.07 0.02
Vendor 0.01 0.16 0.08 0.01 0.04 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.03 0.19 0.49 0.01 0.11 0.03
TOTAL 0.29 3.01 4.40 0.02 0.17 0.09

3.39 Utility Trenching (2025)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.23 2.72 3.88 0.01 0.05 0.04
Total 0.23 2.72 3.88 0.01 0.05 0.04
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.02
Vendor 0.01 0.15 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.03 0.17 0.36 0.01 0.11 0.03
TOTAL 0.26 2.89 4.24 0.02 0.16 0.07

3.41 Utility Trenching (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.22 2.68 3.86 0.01 0.04 0.04
Total 0.22 2.68 3.86 0.01 0.04 0.04
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.02
Vendor 0.01 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.03 0.16 0.35 0.01 0.11 0.03
TOTAL 0.25 2.84 4.21 0.02 0.15 0.07

3.43 Finishing/Landscaping (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.05 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Total 0.05 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.07 0.02
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.07 0.02
TOTAL 0.07 1.26 2.46 0.01 0.08 0.03

3.45 Finishing/Landscaping (2027)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.05 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Total 0.05 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Offsite
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.07 0.02
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.02 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.07 0.02
TOTAL 0.07 1.26 2.39 0.01 0.08 0.03
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Utility Relocation Trenching 0 3 4 0.02 0.17 0.09
Building Demolition - 2023 1 16 21 0.06 1.97 0.62
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition - 2023 2 27 41 0.10 2.72 0.92 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling - 2023
69 17 118 0.07 6.32 1.99
Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling - 2024
69 17 118 0.07 6.28 1.97
Site Preparation 1 47 42 0.22 13.40 5.00
Rough Grading 2 96 50 0.47 21.00 6.65
Fine Grading 1 18 22 0.08 4.65 1.64
Building Construction - 2024 2 13 39 0.03 4.52 1.18
Building Construction - 2025 2 12 37 0.03 4.51 1.17
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2025 5 16 46 0.05 5.49 1.46
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2026 4 16 45 0.05 5.47 1.44
Building Construction and Architectural Coating - 2026 4 13 40 0.04 5.32 1.37 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping - 2026 5 21 53 0.05 5.76 1.55 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping - 2026 2 20 48 0.05 4.95 1.34
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping - 2027 2 20 44 0.05 4.93 1.33
Building Construction - 2027 2 12 31 0.03 4.49 1.15
MAX DAILY 69 96 118 0.47 21.00 6.65
Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet: Roadway Improvements

3.1 Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 0.24 3.06 4.48 0.01 0.05 0.05
Dust from Material Movement 0.14 0.01
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.01
Total 0.25 3.08 4.49 0.02 0.31 0.07
Offsite
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.48 0.00 0.10 0.02
Vendor 0.01 0.14 0.07 0.01 0.04 0.01
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.04 0.17 0.55 0.01 0.14 0.03
TOTAL 0.28 3.25 5.04 0.02 0.45 0.10

3.3 Linear, Grading & Excavation (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 1.45 26.20 45.60 0.07 0.28 0.27
Dust from Material Movement 0.97 0.10
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 1.02 0.10
Total 1.46 26.22 45.61 0.08 2.27 0.47
Offsite
Worker 0.14 0.15 2.42 0.00 0.49 0.11
Vendor 0.02 0.62 0.30 0.01 0.16 0.05
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.16 0.77 2.72 0.01 0.65 0.16
TOTAL 1.62 26.99 48.33 0.08 2.92 0.63

3.5 Linear, Drainage, Utilities & Sub-Grade (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 0.86 14.70 24.50 0.04 0.17 0.16
Dust from Material Movement 0.41 0.04
Onsite truck 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.44 0.04
Total 0.87 14.72 24.51 0.05 1.02 0.24
Offsite
Worker 0.09 0.10 1.61 0.00 0.33 0.08
Vendor 0.02 0.62 0.30 0.01 0.16 0.05
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.11 0.72 1.91 0.01 0.49 0.13
TOTAL 0.98 15.44 26.42 0.05 1.51 0.37

3.7 Linear, Paving (2026)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 0.49 7.78 12.40 0.02 0.10 0.10
Total 0.49 7.78 12.40 0.02 0.10 0.10
Offsite
Worker 0.06 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.23 0.05
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.06 0.08 0.96 0.00 0.23 0.05
TOTAL 0.55 7.86 13.36 0.02 0.33 0.15

3.9 Linear, Paving (2027)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 0.48 7.77 12.40 0.02 0.10 0.09
Total 0.48 7.77 12.40 0.02 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker 0.06 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.23 0.05
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.06 0.08 0.89 0.00 0.23 0.05
TOTAL 0.54 7.85 13.29 0.02 0.33 0.14
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing035 0.02 0.45 0.10
Linear, Grading & Excavation2 27 48 0.08 2.92 0.63
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade1 15 26 0.05 1.51 0.37 Linear, Paving - 2026
18 13 0.02 0.33 0.15
Linear, Paving - 202718 13 0.02 0.33 0.14
MAX DAILY 2 27 48 0.08 2.92 0.63
Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Construction LST Worksheet:

3.1 Building Demolition (2023)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 10.90 18.40 0.21 0.20
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.04
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 10.92 18.41 0.79 0.27
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10.92 18.41 0.79 0.27

3.3 Building Demolition (2024)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 10.80 18.40 0.19 0.18
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.04
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 10.82 18.41 0.77 0.25
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10.82 18.41 0.77 0.25

3.5 Building Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2023) NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.47
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.85 48.10 3.70 0.91
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.85 48.10 3.70 0.91

3.7 Building Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2024) NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00 3.11 0.47
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.85 48.10 3.70 0.91
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.85 48.10 3.70 0.91

3.9 Asphalt Demolition (2023)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 10.90 18.40 0.21 0.20
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.29 0.03
Total 10.92 18.41 0.50 0.23
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10.92 18.41 0.50 0.23

3.11 Asphalt Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2023) NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44

3.13 Asphalt Demo Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling (2024) NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.85 48.10 0.59 0.44

3.15 Site Preparation (2024)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 14.70 28.30 0.10 0.10
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 5.13 2.63
Onsite truck 0.03 0.01 1.02 0.10
Total 14.73 28.31 6.25 2.83
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 14.73 28.31 6.25 2.83

3.17 Rough Grading (2024)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 10.00 17.80 0.08 0.08
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.89
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.73 0.07
Total 10.02 17.81 2.67 1.04
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10.02 17.81 2.67 1.04

3.19 Fine Grading (2024)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 10.00 17.80 0.08 0.08
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.89
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.73 0.07
Total 10.02 17.81 2.65 1.04
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 10.02 17.81 2.65 1.04

3.21 Building Construction (2024)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 9.26 15.00 0.12 0.11
Total 9.26 15.00 0.12 0.11
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 9.26 15.00 0.12 0.11

3.23 Building Construction (2025)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 9.21 15.00 0.11 0.11
Total 9.21 15.00 0.11 0.11
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 9.21 15.00 0.11 0.11

3.25 Building Construction (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 9.17 15.00 0.11 0.10
Total 9.17 15.00 0.11 0.10
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total
TOTAL 9.17 15.00 0.11 0.10

3.27 Building Construction (2027)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 9.13 15.00 0.10 0.09
Total 9.13 15.00 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 9.13 15.00 0.10 0.09

3.29 Paving (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 6.22 9.35 0.10 0.09
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 6.22 9.35 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 6.22 9.35 0.10 0.09

3.31 Paving (2027)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 6.21 9.35 0.10 0.09
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 6.21 9.35 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 6.21 9.35 0.10 0.09

3.33 Architectural Coating (2025)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.88 1.14 0.03 0.03

3.35 Architectural Coating (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.86 1.13 0.02 0.02
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 0.86 1.13 0.02 0.02
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.86 1.13 0.02 0.02

3.37 Utility Relocation Trenching (2023)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 2.82 3.91 0.06 0.06
Total 2.82 3.91 0.06 0.06
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 2.82 3.91 0.06 0.06

3.39 Utility Trenching (2025)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 2.72 3.88 0.05 0.04
Total 2.72 3.88 0.05 0.04
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 2.72 3.88 0.05 0.04

3.41 Utility Trenching (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 2.68 3.86 0.04 0.04
Total 2.68 3.86 0.04 0.04
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 2.68 3.86 0.04 0.04

3.43 Finishing/Landscaping (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01
Total 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 1.24 2.14 0.01 0.01

3.45 Finishing/Landscaping (2027)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-Road Equipment 0.05 1.24 0.00 0.00
Total 0.05 1.24 0.00 0.00
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 0.05 1.24 0.00 0.00

3.1 Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 3.06 4.48 0.05 0.05
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.01
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.12 0.01
Total 3.08 4.49 0.31 0.07
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 3.08 4.49 0.31 0.07

3.3 Linear, Grading & Excavation (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 26.20 45.60 0.28 0.27
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.10
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 1.02 0.10
Total 26.22 45.61 2.27 0.47
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 26.22 45.61 2.27 0.47

3.5 Linear, Drainage, Utilities & Sub-Grade (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 14.70 24.50 0.17 0.16
Dust from Material Movement 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.04
Onsite truck 0.02 0.01 0.44 0.04
Total 14.72 24.51 1.02 0.24
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 14.72 24.51 1.02 0.24

3.7 Linear, Paving (2026)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 7.78 12.40 0.10 0.10
Total 7.78 12.40 0.10 0.10
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 7.78 12.40 0.10 0.10

3.9 Linear, Paving (2027)
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Onsite
Off-road Equipment 7.77 12.40 0.10 0.09
Total 7.77 12.40 0.10 0.09
Offsite
Worker
Vendor
Hauling
Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 7.77 12.40 0.10 0.09
Roadway Improvements
NOx CO PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Utility Relocation Trenching 3 4 0.06 0.06

0.50 Acre LST 57 585 108.68 58.94
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Demolition - 2023 11 18 0.79 0.27

1.00 Acre LST 57 585 108.68 58.94
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition - 2023 22 37 1.27 0.48

2.00 Acre LST 82 842 117.68 64.90
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite
Processing/Recycling - 2023
13 115 5.06 1.60

1.00 Acre LST 57 585 108.68 58.94
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Site Preparation 15 28 6.25 2.83

3.50 Acre LST 103 1,186 129.17 71.86
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Rough Grading 10 18 2.67 1.04

2.50 Acre LST 89 957 121.51 67.22
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Fine Grading 10 18 2.65 1.04

2.50 Acre LST 89 957 121.51 67.22
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction 9 15 0.12 0.11

1.31 Acre LST 65 665 111.50 60.80
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and
Architectural Coating - 2025 13 20 0.19 0.18

1.81 Acre LST 77 794 116.00 63.78
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction and Architectural Coating - 2026 10 16 0.13 0.12

1.31 Acre LST 65 665 111.50 60.80
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Architectural Coating,
Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping,
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing - 2026
21 32 0.55 0.29

2.81 Acre LST 93 1,028 123.91 68.67
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Architectural Coating,
Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping,
and Linear, Grading & Excavation - 2026
44 73 2.51 0.69

5.00 Acre LST 123 1,530 140.67 78.82
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Grading & Excavation -
2026
43 72 2.49 0.67

5.00 Acre LST 123 1,530 140.67 78.82
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Grade - 2026
31 51 1.24 0.44

4.31 Acre LST 114 1,372 135.40 75.63
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear & Paving - 2026 24 39 0.32 0.30

3.81 Acre LST 107 1,258 131.57 73.31
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear & Paving - 2027 23 38 0.30 0.27

3.81 Acre LST 107 1,258 131.57 73.31
Exceeds LST? no no no no
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping - 2027 15 26 0.20 0.18

2.31 Acre LST 86 914 120.08 66.35
Exceeds LST? no no no no

Regional Construction Emissions Worksheet:

ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Utility Relocation Trenching 0 3 4 0 0 0
Building Demolition - 2023 1 16 21 0 2 1
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition - 2023 2 27 41 0 3 1 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling - 2023 69 17 118 0 6 2 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling - 2024 69 17 118 0 6 2 Site Preparation 1 47 42 0 13 5
Rough Grading 2 96 50 0 21 7
Fine Grading 1 18 22 0 5 2
Building Construction - 2024 2 13 39 0 5 1
Building Construction - 2025 2 12 37 0 5 1
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2025 5 16 46 0 5 1 Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2026 4 16 45 0 5 1 Building Construction and Architectural Coating - 2026 4 13 40 0 5 1 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping - 2026 5 21 53 0 6 2
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping - 2026 2 20 48 0 5 1
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping - 2027 2 20 44 0 5 1
Building Construction - 2027 2 12 31 0 4 1
Building Portion
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 0 3 5 0 0 0
Linear, Grading & Excavation 2 27 48 0 3 1
Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 1 15 26 0 2 0
Linear, Paving - 2026 1 8 13 0 0 0
Linear, Paving - 2027 1 8 13 0 0 0
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Utility Relocation Trenching 0 3 4 0 0 0
Building Demolition - 2023 1 16 21 0 2 1
Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition - 2023 2 27 41 0 3 1 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling - 2023 69 17 118 0 6 2 Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling - 2024 69 17 118 0 6 2 Site Preparation 1 47 42 0 13 5
Rough Grading 2 96 50 0 21 7
Fine Grading 1 18 22 0 5 2
Building Construction - 2024 2 13 39 0 5 1
Building Construction - 2025 2 12 37 0 5 1
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2025 5 16 46 0 5 1 YEAR 2025
Roadway Improvements Portion
Overlapping Construction Phasing
YEAR 2023
YEAR 2024
Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating - 2026 5 21 53 0 6 2 Building Construction and Architectural Coating - 2026 4 13 40 0 5 1 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing 5 24 59 0 6 2 Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation 6 48 102 0 9 2 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Grading & Excavation 4 20 44 0 5 1 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade 3 28 58 0 6 2 Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear & Paving 3 27 62 0 5 1
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping, Linear & Paving 3 28 57 0 5 1
Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and
Finishing/Landscaping 2 20 44 0 5 1
Building Construction 2 12 31 0 4 1
MAX DAILY 69 96 118 0 21 7
Regional Daily Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
YEAR 2026
Year 2027
1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.1.13
Proposed Project
Summer
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 5.1 2.9 50.3 0.1 4.6 0.8
Area 9.9 0.2 24.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Energy 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total 15.1 4.4 75.4 0.1 4.7 1.0
Winter
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 5.1 3.2 45.8 0.1 4.6 0.8
Area 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Energy 0.1 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.1
Total 12.8 4.5 46.4 0.1 4.7 0.9
Max Daily
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 Total PM2.5 Total
Mobile 5 3 50 0 5 1
Area 10 0 25 0 0 0
Energy 0 1 1 0 0 0
Total 15 4 75 0 5 1
55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No No No
Regional Operation Emissions Worksheet:

Regional Thresholds (lb/day)
GHG Emissions Inventory
Proposed Project Buildout
Construction1
Mixed-Use Building Roadway Improvement TOTAL
MTCO2e MTCO2e MTCO2e
2023 100 0 100
2024 1,517 0 1,517
2025 980 0 980
2026 1,183 460 1,643
2027 89 8 96
Total Construction 3,868 468 4,336
30-Year Amortization2 129 16 145
Operations1 MTCO2e/Year2
Operations %
Mobile 1,821 69%
Area 8 0%
Energy 537 20%
Water 26 1%
Solid Waste 105 4%
Refrigerants 0 0%
30-Year Construction Amortization 145 5%
2,641 100%
South Coast AQMD Bright-Line Screening Threshold 3,000
Exceed Threshold? No
1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.1.13
2 MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.
2 Total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years per SCAQMD methodology; SCAQMD. 2009, November 19. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 14. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. 1 CalEEMod, Version 2022.1.12
LST Worksheets

SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 0.50 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 57 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
CO 585 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 108.68 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 58.94 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 0.50
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
1 57 58 68 90 142
57 58 68 90 142
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
1 4 13 29 61 158
4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
1 3 5 10 26 93
3 5 10 26 93
South Coastal LA County

0.50 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 57 58 68 90 142
CO 585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 3 5 10 26 93
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 1
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Utility Relocation Trenching NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 1.00 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 57 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 0
CO 585 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 108.68 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 2 1
PM2.5 58.94 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 1.00
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
1 57 58 68 90 142
57 58 68 90 142
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
1 4 13 29 61 158
4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
1 3 5 10 26 93
3 5 10 26 93
South Coastal LA County

1.00 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 57 58 68 90 142
CO 585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 3 5 10 26 93
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 1
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Demolition NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 2.00 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 82 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 0
CO 842 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 117.68 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 4 2
PM2.5 64.90 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 2.00
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 2 82 80 87 106 151
2 82 80 87 106 151
82 80 87 106 151
CO 2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
842 1158 1611 2869 8253
PM10 2 7 21 37 70 167
2 7 21 37 70 167
7 21 37 70 167
PM2.5 2 5 7 13 30 101
2 5 7 13 30 101
5 7 13 30 101
South Coastal LA County

2.00 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 82 80 87 106 151
CO 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
PM10 7 21 37 70 167
PM2.5 5 7 13 30 101
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 2 4 2
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Demolition and Asphalt Demolition NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 1.00 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 57 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 0
CO 585 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 108.68 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 2 1
PM2.5 58.94 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 1.00
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
1 57 58 68 90 142
57 58 68 90 142
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
1 4 13 29 61 158
4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
1 3 5 10 26 93
3 5 10 26 93
South Coastal LA County

1.00 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 57 58 68 90 142
CO 585 789 1180 2296 7558
PM10 4 13 29 61 158
PM2.5 3 5 10 26 93
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 1
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Demolition, Building Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling, and Asphalt Debris Onsite Processing/Recycling NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 3.50 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 103 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 4 2
CO 1,186 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 129.17 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 3 1.5
PM2.5 71.86 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 3.50
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 3 96 93 100 118 160
4 109 105 113 129 170
103 99 107 124 165
CO 3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
4 1301 1707 2279 3746 9550
1186 1570 2112 3527 9226
PM10 3 9 28 44 77 175
4 12 35 51 85 183
11 32 48 81 179
PM2.5 3 6 8 15 33 107
4 7 9 16 36 114
7 9 16 35 111
South Coastal LA County

3.50 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 103 99 107 124 165
CO 1186 1570 2112 3527 9226
PM10 11 32 48 81 179
PM2.5 7 9 16 35 111
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 3 4 4
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Site Preparation NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 2.50 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 89 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 3 1.5
CO 957 Graders 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
PM10 121.51 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
PM2.5 67.22 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 2.50
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 2 82 80 87 106 151
3 96 93 100 118 160
89 86 94 112 156
CO 2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
957 1295 1778 3088 8577
PM10 2 7 21 37 70 167
3 9 28 44 77 175
8 25 41 74 171
PM2.5 2 5 7 13 30 101
3 6 8 15 33 107
6 8 14 32 104
South Coastal LA County

2.50 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 89 86 94 112 156
CO 957 1295 1778 3088 8577
PM10 8 25 41 74 171
PM2.5 6 8 14 32 104
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 2 4 3
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Rough Grading NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 2.50 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 89 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 3 1.5
CO 957 Graders 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
PM10 121.51 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
PM2.5 67.22 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 2.50
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 2 82 80 87 106 151
3 96 93 100 118 160
89 86 94 112 156
CO 2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
957 1295 1778 3088 8577
PM10 2 7 21 37 70 167
3 9 28 44 77 175
8 25 41 74 171
PM2.5 2 5 7 13 30 101
3 6 8 15 33 107
6 8 14 32 104
South Coastal LA County

2.50 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 89 86 94 112 156
CO 957 1295 1778 3088 8577
PM10 8 25 41 74 171
PM2.5 6 8 14 32 104
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 2 4 3
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Fine Grading NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 1.31 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 65 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 665 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 111.50 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 60.80 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 1.31
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
2 82 80 87 106 151
65 65 74 95 145
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
665 904 1315 2475 7775
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
2 7 21 37 70 167
5 16 32 64 161
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
2 5 7 13 30 101
4 6 11 27 96
South Coastal LA County

1.31 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 65 65 74 95 145
CO 665 904 1315 2475 7775
PM10 5 16 32 64 161
PM2.5 4 6 11 27 96
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 2
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 1.81 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
NOx 77 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 794 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 116.00 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 63.78 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 1.81
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
2 82 80 87 106 151
77 76 83 103 149
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
794 1089 1530 2762 8123
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
2 7 21 37 70 167
6 20 36 68 165
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
2 5 7 13 30 101
5 7 12 29 100
South Coastal LA County

1.81 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 77 76 83 103 149
CO 794 1089 1530 2762 8123
PM10 6 20 36 68 165
PM2.5 5 7 12 29 100
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 2
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Utility Trenching, and Architectural Coating
NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 1.31 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25
NOx 65 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 665 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 111.50 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 60.80 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 1.31
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 1 57 58 68 90 142
2 82 80 87 106 151
65 65 74 95 145
CO 1 585 789 1180 2296 7558
2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
665 904 1315 2475 7775
PM10 1 4 13 29 61 158
2 7 21 37 70 167
5 16 32 64 161
PM2.5 1 3 5 10 26 93
2 5 7 13 30 101
4 6 11 27 96
South Coastal LA County

1.31 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 65 65 74 95 145
CO 665 904 1315 2475 7775
PM10 5 16 32 64 161
PM2.5 4 6 11 27 96
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 1 4 2
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction and Architectural Coating NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 2.81 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 3 1.5
NOx 93 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 1,028 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 123.91 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 68.67 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 2.81
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 2 82 80 87 106 151
3 96 93 100 118 160
93 90 98 115 159
CO 2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
1028 1381 1882 3225 8780
PM10 2 7 21 37 70 167
3 9 28 44 77 175
9 27 43 76 174
PM2.5 2 5 7 13 30 101
3 6 8 15 33 107
6 8 14 32 106
South Coastal LA County

2.81 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 93 90 98 115 159
CO 1028 1381 1882 3225 8780
PM10 9 27 43 76 174
PM2.5 6 8 14 32 106
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 2 4 3
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 5.00 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 7 3.5
NOx 123 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 1,530 Graders 0.5 0.0625 8 2 1
PM10 140.67 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 78.82 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 5.81
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 5 123 118 126 141 179
5 123 118 126 141 179
123 118 126 141 179
CO 5 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
5 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
PM10 5 14 42 58 92 191
5 14 42 58 92 191
14 42 58 92 191
PM2.5 5 8 10 18 39 120
5 8 10 18 39 120
8 10 18 39 120
South Coastal LA County

5.00 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 123 118 126 141 179
CO 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
PM10 14 42 58 92 191
PM2.5 8 10 18 39 120
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 5 4 5
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Architectural Coating, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 5.00 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 7 3.5
NOx 123 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 1,530 Graders 0.5 0.0625 8 2 1
PM10 140.67 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 78.82 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 5.81
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 5 123 118 126 141 179
5 123 118 126 141 179
123 118 126 141 179
CO 5 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
5 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
PM10 5 14 42 58 92 191
5 14 42 58 92 191
14 42 58 92 191
PM2.5 5 8 10 18 39 120
5 8 10 18 39 120
8 10 18 39 120
South Coastal LA County

5.00 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 123 118 126 141 179
CO 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
PM10 14 42 58 92 191
PM2.5 8 10 18 39 120
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 5 4 5
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Grading & Excavation NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 4.31 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 5 2.5
NOx 114 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 1,372 Graders 0.5 0.0625 8 1 0.5
PM10 135.40 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 75.63 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 4.31
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 4 109 105 113 129 170
5 123 118 126 141 179
114 109 117 133 173
CO 4 1301 1707 2279 3746 9550
5 1530 1982 2613 4184 10198
1372 1793 2383 3883 9752
PM10 4 12 35 51 85 183
5 14 42 58 92 191
12 37 53 87 186
PM2.5 4 7 9 16 36 114
5 8 10 18 39 120
7 9 17 37 116
South Coastal LA County

4.31 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 114 109 117 133 173
CO 1372 1793 2383 3883 9752
PM10 12 37 53 87 186
PM2.5 7 9 17 37 116
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 4 4 5
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Drainage, Utilities, and Sub-Grade NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 3.81 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 5 2.5
NOx 107 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 1,258 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 131.57 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 73.31 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 3.81
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 3 96 93 100 118 160
4 109 105 113 129 170
107 103 111 127 168
CO 3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
4 1301 1707 2279 3746 9550
1258 1656 2216 3663 9428
PM10 3 9 28 44 77 175
4 12 35 51 85 183
11 34 50 83 182
PM2.5 3 6 8 15 33 107
4 7 9 16 36 114
7 9 16 35 112
South Coastal LA County

3.81 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 107 103 111 127 168
CO 1258 1656 2216 3663 9428
PM10 11 34 50 83 182
PM2.5 7 9 16 35 112
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 3 4 4
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping, and Linear, Paving
NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
SRA No. Acres
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance (Feet)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(meters)
Source
Receptor
Distance
(Feet)
Construction
/ Project Site
Size (Acres)
4 2.31 25 82 347 1140 5.80
Source Receptor South Coastal LA County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Daily hours Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters) 25 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 8 2 1
NOx 86 Tractors 0.5 0.0625 7 3 1.3125
CO 914 Graders 0.5 0.0625 0
PM10 120.08 Dozers 0.5 0.0625 0
PM2.5 66.35 Scrapers 1 0.125 0
Acres 2.31
Acres 25 50 100 200 500
NOx 2 82 80 87 106 151
3 96 93 100 118 160
86 84 91 110 154
CO 2 842 1158 1611 2869 8253
3 1071 1433 1945 3307 8901
914 1244 1715 3006 8456
PM10 2 7 21 37 70 167
3 9 28 44 77 175
8 23 39 72 170
PM2.5 2 5 7 13 30 101
3 6 8 15 33 107
5 7 14 31 103
South Coastal LA County

2.31 Acres
25 50 100 200 500
NOx 86 84 91 110 154
CO 914 1244 1715 3006 8456
PM10 8 23 39 72 170
PM2.5 5 7 14 31 103
Acre Below Acre Above
SRA No. Acres SRA No. Acres
4 2 4 3
Distance Increment Below
25 Distance Increment Above
25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008
Construction Localized Significance Thresholds: Building Construction, Asphalt/Concrete Paving, and Finishing/Landscaping
NOx & CO PM10 & PM2.5
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
July 2023
Appendix C Biological Technical Report
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.

BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR
MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT 6615 E.

PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

LOCATED IN THE CITY OF LONG BEACH,

LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For:

PlaceWorks
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, California 92707
Contact: Mariana Zimmermann
Phone: (714) 966-9220
Prepared By:

Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc.
1940 E. Deere Avenue, Suite 250
Santa Ana, California 92705
Phone: (949) 340-6490
Report Preparer: Erin Trung
June 28, 2023
ii

INFORMATION SUMMARY
A. Report Date: June 28, 2023
B. Report Title: Biological Technical Report for the Marketplace MixedUse Project at 6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway C. Project Site
Location: The Project site is located at 33.754902°N, -118.106846°W within Section 3 of Township 4 South, Range 10 West, of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle map Los Alamitos, CA [Exhibit 2 – Vicinity Map]. The
Project site is bounded by East Pacific Coast Highway to the southwest, Studebaker Road to the southeast, and
commercial development to the northeast and northwest.

D. Owner/Applicant: CP VI Marketplace, LLC
1000 Sansome Street, 1st Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Contact: Hunter Weaver, Will Cipes
Phone: (310) 968-6942
Email: hweaver@carmelpartners, wcipes@carmelpartners
E. Principal
Investigator: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc.
1940 E. Deere Avenue, Suite 250
Santa Ana, California 92705
Phone: (949) 837-0404
Report Preparer: Erin Trung
F. Individuals Conducting Fieldwork: Erin Trung, Tony Bomkamp G. Report Summary: This report describes the current biological conditions for the Marketplace Mixed-Use Project at 6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway [Project] and evaluates impacts to biological resources from development of the Project.

Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA) biologists/regulatory specialists conducted a general biological survey, vegetation mapping, habitat assessments, and evaluation for federal and state jurisdictional waters/wetlands for the 7.20-acre Study Area (5.75 acres Project site, 1.45 acres in a 100-foot buffer) on March 16, 2023.

The proposed Project will not impact special-status plant or animal species, habitats, or waters subject to the jurisdictions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or the California Coastal Commission (CCC). iii
The proposed Project would be consistent with all applicable SEASP (City of Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan) Chapter 5 policies. iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page #
INFORMATION SUMMARY........................................................................................... ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background and Scope of Work .......................................................................... 1

1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Project Description............................................................................................... 2

2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 2

2.1 Summary of Surveys............................................................................................ 3

2.2 Botanical Resources............................................................................................. 4

2.3 Wildlife Resources............................................................................................... 5

2.4 Jurisdictional Waters............................................................................................ 6

3.0 REGULATORY SETTING..................................................................................... 7

3.1 Endangered Species Acts..................................................................................... 7

3.2 California Environmental Quality Act ................................................................. 8

3.3 Jurisdictional Waters.......................................................................................... 12

3.4 Local Approvals................................................................................................. 18

4.0 RESULTS .............................................................................................................. 21

4.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................................ 21

4.2 Vegetation Mapping........................................................................................... 22

4.3 Special-Status Vegetation Communities............................................................ 24

4.4 Special-Status Plants.......................................................................................... 24

4.5 Special-Status Animals ...................................................................................... 28

4.6 Nesting Birds...................................................................................................... 35

4.7 Wildlife Linkages/ Corridors and Nursery Sites................................................ 35

4.8 Critical Habitat ................................................................................................... 36

4.9 Jurisdictional Delineation................................................................................... 36

5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS............................................................................................ 36

5.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)................................................. 37

5.2 Special-Status Species........................................................................................ 39

5.3 Sensitive Vegetation Communities.................................................................... 39

5.4 Wetlands............................................................................................................. 39

5.5 Wildlife Movement and Native Wildlife Nursery Sites..................................... 40

5.6 Local Policies or Ordinances.............................................................................. 40 v

5.7 Habitat Conservation Plans................................................................................ 41

5.8 Impacts to Critical Habitat ................................................................................. 41

5.9 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters........................................................................ 41

5.10 Indirect Impacts to Biological Resources........................................................... 41

5.11 Cumulative Impacts to Biological Resources .................................................... 42

6.0 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES............................................... 42

6.1 Nesting Birds...................................................................................................... 42

6.2 SEASP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program .................................... 43

7.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 47

8.0 CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................. 48 TABLES
Table 2-1. Summary of Biological Surveys for the Project Site........................................ 3 Table 3-1. CNPS Ranks 1, 2, 3, & 4, and Threat Code Extensions................................. 11 Table 4-1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Use Types for the Project Site ....................... 22 Table 4-2. Special-Status Plants Evaluated for the Project Site ...................................... 24 Table 4-3. Special Status Animals Evaluated for the Project Site................................... 28 Table 5-1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Use Impacts ................................................... 39

EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 Regional Map
Exhibit 2 Vicinity Map
Exhibit 3 Aerial Map
Exhibit 4 Vegetation Map
Exhibit 5 Site Photographs
Exhibit 6 Potential SEASP Wetlands

APPENDICES
Appendix A Floral Compendium
Appendix B Faunal Compendium
1 1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background and Scope of Work
This document provides the results of general biological surveys for the approximately 5.75-acre Marketplace Project (the Project) located in the City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California. This report identifies and evaluates impacts to biological resources associated with the proposed Project in the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and State and Federal regulations such as the Endangered Species Act (ESA), Clean Water Act (CWA), the California Fish and Game Code, and the California Coastal Act. This report also provides an analysis of the proposed project as relates to biological resources and wetlands in the context of the City of Long Beach Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP).

The scope of this report includes a discussion of existing conditions for the approximately 5.75- acre Project site, all methods employed regarding the general biological surveys, the documentation of botanical and wildlife resources identified (including special-status species), and an analysis of impacts to biological resources. Methods of the study include a review of relevant literature, field surveys, and a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based analysis of vegetation communities. As appropriate, this report is consistent with accepted scientific and technical standards and survey guideline requirements issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), the California Native Plant Society (CNPS), and other applicable agencies/organizations.

The field study focused on a number of primary objectives that would comply with CEQA requirements, including (1) general reconnaissance survey and vegetation mapping; (2) general biological surveys; (3) habitat assessments for special-status plant species; (4) habitat assessments for special-status wildlife species; (5) assessment for the presence of wildlife migration and colonial nursery sites; and (6) assessments for areas subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, State Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, and CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Division 2, Chapter 6, Section 1600–1616 of the California Fish and Game Code. Observations of all plant and wildlife species were recorded during the general biological surveys and are included as Appendix A: Floral Compendium and Appendix B: Faunal Compendium.

1.2 Project Location
The Project site comprises approximately 5.75 acres in the City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California [Exhibit 1 – Regional Map] and is located at latitude 33.754902°, longitude - 118.106846° within Section 3 of Township 4 South, Range 10 West, of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle map Los Alamitos, CA [Exhibit 2 – Vicinity Map]. The project site encompasses two full parcels with assessor parcel numbers (APN) 7237-020-040 and 7237-020-050, a portion of APN 7237-020-041, the sidewalk and bike lane along Pacific Coast Highway, and Studebaker Road right-of-way. The Project site is bounded by East Pacific Coast Highway to the southwest, Studebaker Road to the southeast, and commercial development to 2 the northeast and northwest, and the Los Cerritos Wetlands to the north and northwest beyond the existing development.

1.3 Project Description
The proposed Project will demolish two existing office buildings and associated parking and landscape areas located at 6615 and 6695 East Pacific Coast Highway. The proposed project would contain one six-story building with a roof deck and one level of partial subterranean parking. The proposed project would have approximately 645,045 gross square feet (or 429,835 square feet, not including parking). The proposed project includes improvements to Pacific Coast Highway along the west side of the project site and Studebaker Road (public roadway) along the southern side of the project site. On Pacific Coast Highway, the proposed project would construct a curb between the existing bicycle lane and the vehicle travel lane and construct a new bus turn out near the current bus stop. The proposed project would construct roadway improvements within the Studebaker Road existing right-of-way to include a center median, sidewalk, and bicycle lane. Vehicular access would be provided from the Studebaker Road rightof-way to the parcel with APN 7237-020-041. A round-about feature would be installed at the terminus of Studebaker Road. An ingress-egress driveway would extend north from the roundabout to provide access to the existing parking lot to the northeast of the project site. The driveway would extend onto parcel APN 7237-020-041, east of the proposed building.

Studebaker Roadway improvements would provide access to the existing office building on the parcel to the east of the project site and the existing parking lot to the northeast of the project site.

For this report, the term Project site is defined as that area proposed for direct impact by the proposed Project and includes lands controlled by the project proponent and the public right-ofway improvement area, all of which totals approximately 5.75 acres [Exhibit 3]. The term Study Area includes all portions of the Project Site and a buffer of up to 100 feet beyond the offsite improvements that extends into the Pumpkin Patch property, totaling 7.20 acres. The buffer area is included in the Study Area to ensure compliance with the California Coastal Act and SEASP policies for development within 100 feet of wetlands. For this document, all direct impacts are assumed to be permanent. [Exhibit 3].

2.0 METHODOLOGY
In order to adequately identify biological resources in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, Glenn Lukos Associates (GLA) assembled biological data consisting of three main components:
• Performance of a jurisdictional waters and wetlands delineation; • Performance of vegetation and land cover mapping for the Project site; and • Performance of habitat assessments and site-specific biological surveys to evaluate the presence/absence of special-status species in accordance with the requirements of CEQA. 3 The focus of the biological surveys was determined through initial site reconnaissance, a review of the CNDDB (CDFW 2023), CNPS 9th edition online inventory (CNPS 2023), Natural Resource Conservation Service soil data (NRCS 2023), other pertinent literature, knowledge of the region, and site-specific knowledge of the Study Area. Site-specific general surveys within the Project site were conducted on foot in the proposed development areas for each target plant or animal species identified below.

2.1 Summary of Surveys
GLA conducted biological studies in order to identify and analyze actual or potential impacts to biological resources associated with development of the Project site. Observations of all plant and wildlife species were recorded during each of the above-mentioned survey efforts [Appendix A: Floral Compendium and Appendix B: Faunal Compendium]. The studies conducted include the following:
• Performance of vegetation and land cover mapping;
• Performance of site-specific habitat assessments and biological surveys to evaluate the potential presence/absence of special-status species (or potentially suitable habitat) to the satisfaction of CEQA and federal and state regulations; and • Evaluation of aquatic resources (including wetlands and riparian habitat) potentially subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board), CDFW, and the California Coastal Commission (CCC).

Table 2-1 provides a summary list of survey dates, survey types and personnel.

Table 2-1. Summary of Biological Surveys for the Project Site.

Survey Type Survey Dates Biologists
General Biological Survey
Vegetation/Land Cover Mapping
Habitat Assessments
March 16, 2023 Erin Trung
Tony Bomkamp
Individual plants and wildlife species are evaluated in this report based on their “special-status.” For the purpose of this report, plants were considered “special-status” based on one or more of the following criteria:
• Listing through the Federal and/or State Endangered Species Act (ESA); • Occurrence in the CNPS Rare Plant Inventory (Rank 1A/1B, 2A/2B, 3, or 4); and/or • Occurrence in the CNDDB inventory.
4 Wildlife species were considered “special-status” based on one or more of the following criteria:
• Listing through the Federal and/or State ESA; and
• Designation by the State as a Species of Special Concern (SSC) or California Fully Protected (FP) species.

Vegetation communities and habitats were considered “special-status” based on one or more of the following criteria:
• Global (G) and/or State (S) ranking of category 3 or less based on CDFW (see Section

3.2.2 below for further explanation); and
• Riparian habitat.

2.2 Botanical Resources
A site-specific survey program was designed to accurately document the botanical resources within the Project site, and consisted of five components: (1) a literature search; (2) preparation of a list of target special-status plant species and sensitive vegetation communities that could occur within the Study Area; (3) general botanical surveys; (4) vegetation mapping according to the California Natural Communities List; and (5) habitat assessments for special-status plants.

2.2.1 Literature Search
Prior to conducting fieldwork, pertinent literature on the flora of the region was examined. A thorough archival review was conducted using available literature and other historical records.

These resources included the following:
• California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v-9.5; CNPS 2023); and • CNDDB for the USGS 7.5-minute Los Alamitos quadrangle and surrounding quadrangles (CNDDB 2023).

2.2.2 Vegetation Mapping
Vegetation communities and land cover types within the Project site were mapped according to the List of Vegetation Alliances and Associations (or California Natural Community List), as applicable. The list is based on A Manual of California Vegetation, Second Edition or MCVII (Sawyer et al. 2009), which is the California expression of the National Vegetation Classification. Vegetation present generally consists of ornamental plantings (e.g., non-native trees, shrubs, and turf) and herbaceous species strongly adapted to anthropogenic disturbance.

Land cover types include paved parking and existing buildings. Vegetation and land cover types present were mapped directly onto an 80-scale (1”=80’) aerial photograph. A vegetation and land cover map is included as Exhibit 4. Representative site photographs are included as Exhibit 5. 5 2.2.3 Special-Status Plant Species and Habitats Evaluated for the Project Site A literature search was conducted to obtain a list of special status plants with the potential to occur within the Project site. The CNDDB was initially consulted to determine well-known occurrences of plants and habitats of special concern in the region. Other sources used to develop a list of target species for the survey program included the CNPS online inventory (2023).

Based on this information, vegetation profiles and a list of target sensitive plant species and habitats that could occur within the Project site were developed and incorporated into a mapping and survey program to achieve the following goals: (1) characterize the vegetation associations and land use; (2) prepare a detailed floristic compendium; (3) identify the potential for any special status plants that may occur within the Project site; and (4) prepare a map showing the distribution of any sensitive botanical resources associated with the Project site, if applicable.

2.2.4 Botanical Surveys
GLA biologists Erin Trung and Tony Bomkamp visited the site on March 16, 2023, to conduct general botanical surveys. All portions of the Project site were directly observed on foot, except for a small portion of the Pumpkin Patch that was fenced, which was observed through the fence with binoculars and using aerial photography (Google Earth 2023). An additional 100-foot buffer area in the Pumpkin Patch was also observed using binoculars and aerial photography. Surveys were conducted in accordance with accepted botanical survey guidelines (CDFW 2018, CNPS 2001, USFWS 2000, Nelson 1984). As applicable, surveys were conducted at appropriate times based on precipitation and flowering periods. An aerial photograph, a soil map, and/or a topographic map were used to determine the community types and other physical features that may support sensitive and uncommon taxa or communities within the Project site. Surveys were conducted by following meandering transects within target areas of suitable habitat. All plant species encountered during the field surveys were identified and recorded following the abovereferenced guidelines. A complete list of the plant species observed is provided in Appendix A.

Scientific nomenclature and common names used in this report follow Baldwin et al. (2012), and Munz (1974).

2.3 Wildlife Resources
Wildlife species were evaluated and detected during field surveys by sight, call, tracks, and scat.

Site reconnaissance was conducted in such a manner as to allow inspection of the entire Project site by direct observation, including the use of binoculars. The fenced area of the Pumpkin Patch was observed through the fence with binoculars and using aerial photography (Google Earth 2023). An additional 100-foot buffer area in the Pumpkin Patch was also observed using binoculars and aerial photography. Observations of physical evidence and direct sightings of wildlife were recorded in field notes during the visit. A complete list of wildlife species observed within the Project site is provided in Appendix B. Scientific nomenclature and common names for vertebrate species referred to in this report follow the Complete List of Amphibian, Reptile, Bird, and Mammal Species in California (CDFW 2016), Standard Common and Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians 6th 6 Edition, Collins, and Taggert (2009) for amphibians and reptiles, and the American Ornithologists' Society Online Checklist Edition (Chesser et al. 2022) for birds. The methodology (including any applicable survey protocols) utilized to conduct general surveys, habitat assessments, and/or focused surveys for special-status animals are included below.

2.3.1 General Surveys
Birds
During the general biological and reconnaissance survey within the Project site, birds were detected opportunistically by direct observation and/or by vocalizations, with identifications recorded in field notes.

Mammals
During general biological and reconnaissance survey within the Project site, mammals were identified and detected incidentally by direct observations and/or by the presence of diagnostic sign (i.e., tracks, burrows, scat, etc.).

Reptiles and Amphibians
During general biological and reconnaissance surveys within the Project site, reptiles and amphibians were identified incidentally during surveys. Habitats were examined for diagnostic reptile sign, which include shed skins, scat, tracks, snake prints, and lizard tail drag marks. Any reptiles and amphibian species observed, as well as diagnostic sign, were recorded in field notes.

2.3.2 Special-Status Animal Species Reviewed
A literature search was conducted in order to obtain a list of special-status wildlife species with the potential to occur within the Project site. Species were evaluated based on two factors: 1) species identified by the CNDDB as occurring (either currently or historically) on or in the vicinity of the Project site, and 2) any other special-status animals that are known to occur within the vicinity of the Project site, or for which potentially suitable habitat occurs on the Project site.

2.3.3 Habitat Assessment for Special Status Animal Species GLA biologists Erin Trung and Tony Bomkamp conducted habitat assessments for special-status animal species on March 16, 2023. An aerial photograph, soil map and/or topographic map were used to determine the community types and other physical features that may support specialstatus and uncommon taxa within the Project site.

2.4 Jurisdictional Waters
The Project site was evaluated for the presence of jurisdictional waters, including waters of the U.S. (including wetlands) subject to the jurisdiction of the Corps and Regional Board, waters of the State (including riparian vegetation) subject to the jurisdiction of CDFW, and wetlands as 7 defined under the California Coastal Act. Consistent with SEASP Policy 5.3, the evaluation was conducted during the middle of the rainy season.

3.0 REGULATORY SETTING
The proposed Project is subject to state and federal regulations associated with a number of regulatory programs. These programs often overlap and were developed to protect natural resources, including state- and federally listed plants and animals; aquatic resources including rivers and creeks, ephemeral streambeds, wetlands, and areas of riparian habitat; other specialstatus species which are not listed as threatened or endangered by the state or federal governments; and other special-status vegetation communities.

3.1 Endangered Species Acts

3.1.1 California Endangered Species Act
California’s Endangered Species Act (CESA) defines an endangered species as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant which is in serious danger of becoming extinct throughout all, or a significant portion, of its range due to one or more causes, including loss of habitat, change in habitat, overexploitation, predation, competition, or disease.” The State defines a threatened species as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that, although not presently threatened with extinction, is likely to become an Endangered species in the foreseeable future in the absence of the special protection and management efforts required by this chapter. Any animal determined by the commission as rare on or before January 1, 1985, is a threatened species.” Candidate species are defined as “a native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant that the commission has formally noticed as being under review by the department for addition to either the list of endangered species or the list of threatened species, or a species for which the commission has published a notice of proposed regulation to add the species to either list.” Candidate species may be afforded temporary protection as though they were already listed as threatened or endangered at the discretion of the Fish and Game Commission.

Article 3, Sections 2080 through 2085, of the CESA addresses the taking of threatened, endangered, or candidate species by stating “No person shall import into this state, export out of this state, or take, possess, purchase, or sell within this state, any species, or any part or product thereof, that the commission determines to be an endangered species or a threatened species, or attempt any of those acts, except as otherwise provided.” Under the CESA, “take” is defined as “hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill.” Exceptions authorized by the state to allow “take” require permits or memoranda of understanding and can be authorized for endangered species, threatened species, or candidate species for scientific, educational, or management purposes and for take incidental to otherwise lawful activities. Section 1913 of the California Fish and Game Code provide that notification is required prior to disturbance.
8 3.1.2 Federal Endangered Species Act
The FESA of 1973 defines an endangered species as “any species that is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” A threatened species is defined as “any species that is likely to become an Endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” Under provisions of Section 9(a)(1)(B) of the FESA it is unlawful to “take” any listed species. “Take” is defined in Section 3(18) of FESA: “...harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.” Further, the USFWS, through regulation, has interpreted the terms “harm” and “harass” to include certain types of habitat modification that result in injury to, or death of species as forms of “take.” These interpretations, however, are generally considered and applied on a case-by-case basis and often vary from species to species. In a case where a property owner seeks permission from a federal agency for an action that could affect a federally listed plant and animal species, the property owner and agency are required to consult with USFWS. Section 9(a)(2)(b) of the FESA addresses the protections afforded to listed plants.

3.1.3 State and Federal Take Authorizations for Listed Species Federal or state authorizations of impacts to or incidental take of a listed species by a private individual or other private entity would be granted in one of the following ways:
• Section 7 of the FESA stipulates that any federal action that may affect a species listed as threatened or endangered requires a formal consultation with USFWS to ensure that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the listed species or result in destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. 16 U.S.C. 1536(a)(2). • In 1982, the FESA was amended to give private landowners the ability to develop Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP) pursuant to Section 10(a) of the FESA. Upon development of an HCP, the USFWS can issue incidental take permits for listed species where the HCP specifies at minimum, the following: (1) the level of impact that will result from the taking, (2) steps that will minimize and mitigate the impacts, (3) funding necessary to implement the plan, (4) alternative actions to the taking considered by the applicant and the reasons why such alternatives were not chosen, and (5) such other measures that the Secretary of the Interior may require as being necessary or appropriate for the plan. • In certain circumstances, Section 2080.1 of the California Fish and Game Code allows CDFW to adopt the federal incidental take statement or the 10(a) permit as its own based on its findings that the federal permit adequately protects the species under state law.

3.2 California Environmental Quality Act

3.2.1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15380
CEQA requires evaluation of a project’s impacts on biological resources and provides guidelines and thresholds for use by lead agencies for evaluating the significance of proposed impacts.

Sections 5.1.1 and 5.2.2 below set forth these thresholds and guidelines. Furthermore, pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15380, CEQA provides protection for non-listed species that could potentially meet the criteria for state listing. For plants, CDFW recognizes that plants with 9 a California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) on Lists 1A, 1B, 2A, or 2B in the CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants in California may meet the criteria for listing and should be considered under CEQA. CDFW also recommends protection of plants that are regionally important, such as locally rare species, disjunct populations of more common plants, or plants with a CRPR of 3 or 4.

3.2.2 Special-Status Plants, Wildlife and Vegetation Communities Evaluated Under CEQA
Federally Designated Special-Status Species
Within recent years, the USFWS instituted changes in the listing status of candidate species.

Former C1 (candidate) species are now referred to simply as candidate species and represent the only candidates for listing. Former C2 species (for which the USFWS had insufficient evidence to warrant listing) and C3 species (either extinct, no longer a valid taxon or more abundant than was formerly believed) are no longer considered as candidate species. Therefore, these species are no longer maintained in list form by the USFWS, nor are they formally protected. This term is employed in this document but carries no official protections. All references to federally protected species in this report (whether listed, proposed for listing, or candidate) include the most current published status or candidate category to which each species has been assigned by USFWS.

For this report the following acronyms are used for federal special-status species:
• FE Federally listed as Endangered
• FT Federally listed as Threatened
• FPE Federally proposed for listing as Endangered
• FPT Federally proposed for listing as Threatened
• FC Federal Candidate Species (former C1 species)
State-Designated Special-Status Species
Some mammals and birds are protected by the state as Fully Protected (FP) Mammals or Fully Protected Birds, as described in the California Fish and Game Code, Sections 4700 and 3511, respectively. California SSC are designated as vulnerable to extinction due to declining population levels, limited ranges, and/or continuing threats. This list is primarily a working document for the CDFW’s CNDDB project. Informally listed taxa are not protected but warrant consideration in the preparation of biotic assessments. For some species, the CNDDB is only concerned with specific portions of the life history, such as roosts, rookeries, or nest sites.

For this report the following acronyms are used for State special-status species:
• SE State-listed as Endangered
• ST State-listed as Threatened
• SR State-listed as Rare
• SCE State Candidate for listing as Endangered
10 • SCT State Candidate for listing as Threatened
• FP State Fully Protected
• SSC State Species of Special Concern
CNDDB Global/State Rankings
The CNDDB provides global and state rankings for species and communities based on a system developed by The Nature Conservancy to measure rarity of a species. The ranking provides a shorthand formula about the rarity of a species/community and is based on the best information available from multiple sources, including state and federal listings, and other groups that recognize species as sensitive (e.g., Bureau of Land Management, Audubon Society, etc.). State and global rankings are used to prioritize conservation and protection efforts so that the rarest species/communities receive immediate attention. In both cases, the lower ranking (i.e., G1 or S1) indicates extreme rarity. Rare species are given a ranking from 1 to 3. Species with a ranking of 4 or 5 is considered to be common. If the exact global/state ranking is undetermined, a range is generally provided. For example, a global ranking of “G1G3” indicates that a species/community global rarity is between G1 and G3. If the animal being considered is a subspecies of a broader species, a “T” ranking is attached to the global ranking. The following are descriptions of global and state rankings:

Global Rankings
• G1 – Critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity (5 or fewer occurrences), or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extinction. • G2 – Imperiled globally because of rarity (6-20 occurrences), or because of some other factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range. • G3 – Either very rare and local throughout its range (21 to 100 occurrences), or found locally (even abundantly at some of its locations) in a restricted range (e.g., a physiographic region), or because of some other factor(s) making it vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.
• G4 – Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.
• G5 – Common, widespread and abundant.

State Rankings
• S1 – Extremely rare; typically 5 or fewer known occurrences in the state; or only a few remaining individuals; may be especially vulnerable to extirpation. • S2 – Very rare; typically between 6 and 20 known occurrences; may be susceptible to becoming extirpated.
• S3 – Rare to uncommon; typically 21 to 50 known occurrences; S3 ranked species are not yet susceptible to becoming extirpated in the state but may be if additional populations are destroyed.
• S4 – Uncommon but not rare; some cause for long-term concern due to declines or other factors.
• S5 – Common, widespread, and abundant in the state.
11 California Native Plant Society
CNPS is a private plant conservation organization dedicated to the monitoring and protection of sensitive species in California. CNPS’s Ninth Edition of the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California categorizes plants of interest into six California Rare Plant Ranks (CRPR) based on their geographic distribution and potential threats to existing populations. The CNPS Inventory is used by CDFW as the candidate species list for plants that may be listed as state Threatened and Endangered by CDFW. The six categories of rarity that are summarized in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1. CNPS Ranks 1, 2, 3, & 4, and Threat Code Extensions CNPS Rank Comments
Rank 1A – Plants Presumed
Extirpated in California and
Either Rare or Extinct
Elsewhere
Thought to be extinct in California based on a lack of observation or detection for many years.

Rank 1B – Plants Rare,
Threatened, or Endangered in
California and Elsewhere
Species, which are generally rare throughout their range that are also judged to be vulnerable to other threats such as declining habitat.

Rank 2A – Plants presumed
Extirpated in California, But
Common Elsewhere
Species that are presumed extinct in California but more common outside of California
Rank 2B – Plants Rare,
Threatened or Endangered in
California, But More
Common Elsewhere
Species that are rare in California but more common outside of California
Rank 3 – Plants About Which
More Information Is Needed
(A Review List)
Species that are thought to be rare or in decline but CNPS lacks the information needed to assign to the appropriate list. In most instances, the extent of surveys for these species is not sufficient to allow CNPS to accurately assess whether these species should be assigned to a specific rank. In addition, many of the Rank 3 species have associated taxonomic problems such that the validity of their current taxonomy is unclear.

Rank 4 – Plants of Limited
Distribution (A Watch List)
Species that are currently thought to be limited in distribution or range whose vulnerability or susceptibility to threat is currently low. In some cases, as noted above for Rank 3 species, CNPS lacks survey data to accurately determine status in California. Many species have been placed on Rank 4 in previous editions of the “Inventory” and have been removed as survey data has indicated that the species are more common than previously thought. CNPS recommends that species currently included on this list should be monitored to ensure that future substantial declines are minimized.

Extension Comments
.1 – Seriously endangered in
California
Species with over 80% of occurrences threatened and/or have a high degree and immediacy of threat.
.2 – Fairly endangered in
California
Species with 20-80% of occurrences threatened.
.3 – Not very endangered in
California
Species with <20% of occurrences threatened or with no current threats known.
12 3.3 Jurisdictional Waters

3.3.1 Army Corps of Engineers
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Corps regulates the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States. The term “waters of the United States” is defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 328.3(a) as:
(1) Waters which are:
(i) Currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
(ii) The territorial seas; or
(iii) Interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; (2) Impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition, other than impoundments of waters identified under paragraph (a)(5) of this section;
(3) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section:
(i) That are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water; or
(ii) That either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (4) Wetlands adjacent to the following waters:
(i) Waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or (ii) Relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water identified in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3)(i) of this section and with a continuous surface connection to those waters; or
(iii) Waters identified in paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section when the wetlands either alone or in combination with similarly situated water in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; (5) Intrastate lakes and ponds, streams, or wetlands not identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section:
(i) That are relatively permanent, standing or continuously flowing bodies of water with a continuous surface connection to the waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(3)(i) of this section; or
(ii) That either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, significantly affect the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 328.3(b) exclude the following from being “waters of the United States” even where they otherwise meet the terms of paragraphs (a)(2) through (5) above:
13 (1) Waste treatment systems, including treatment ponds or lagoons, designed to meet the requirements of the Clean Water Act;
(2) Prior converted cropland designated by the Secretary of Agriculture. The exclusion would cease upon a change of use, which means that the area is no longer available for the production of agricultural commodities.

Notwithstanding the determination of an area’s status as prior converted cropland by any other Federal agency, for the purposes of the Clean Water Act, the final authority regarding Clean Water Act jurisdiction remains with EPA;
(3) Ditches (including roadside ditches) excavated wholly in and draining only dry land and that do not carry a relatively permanent flow of water; (4) Artificially irrigated areas that would revert to dry land if the irrigation ceased;
(5) Artificial lakes or ponds created by excavating or diking dry land to collect and retain water and which are used exclusively for such purposes as stock watering, irrigation, settling basins, or rice growing; (6) Artificial reflecting or swimming pools or other small ornamental bodies of water created by excavating or diking dry land to retain water for primarily aesthetic reasons;
(7) Waterfilled depressions created in dry land incidental to construction activity and pits excavated in dry land for the purpose of obtaining fill, sand, or gravel unless and until the construction or excavation operation is abandoned and the resulting body of water meets the definition of waters of the United States; and
(8) Swales and erosional features (e.g., gullies, small washes) characterized by low volume, infrequent, or short duration flow.

In the absence of wetlands, the limits of Corps jurisdiction in non-tidal waters, such as intermittent streams, extend to the OHWM which is defined at 33 CFR 328.3(c)(4) as:
...that line on the shore established by the fluctuation of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas.
“Adjacent wetlands” are defined by 33 CFR 328.3(c)(2) as those wetlands that are “bordering, contiguous, or neighboring” other waters of the United States, and include those “separated from other waters of the United States by man-made dikes or barriers, natural river berms, beach dunes, and the like...”
The term "significantly affect” is defined by 33 CFR 328.3(c)(6) as:

A material influence on the chemical, physical, or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section. To determine whether waters, either alone or in combination with similarly situated waters in the region, have a material influence on the chemical, physical, 14 or biological integrity of waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the functions identified in paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this section will be assessed and the factors identified in paragraph (c)(6)(ii) of this section will be considered:
(i) Functions to be assessed:
(A) Contribution of flow;
(B) Trapping, transformation, filtering, and transport of materials (including nutrients, sediment, and other pollutants);
(C) Retention and attenuation of floodwaters and runoff; (D) Modulation of temperature in waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; or
(E) Provision of habitat and food resources for aquatic species located in waters identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section;
(ii) Factors to be considered:
(A) The distance from a water identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section;
(B) Hydrologic factors, such as the frequency, duration, magnitude, timing, and rate of hydrologic connections, including shallow subsurface flow;
(C) The size, density, or number of waters that have been determined to be similarly situated;
(D) Landscape position and geomorphology; and
(E) Climatological variables such as temperature, rainfall, and snowpack.

Wetland Definition Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act The term “wetlands” (a subset of “waters of the United States”) is defined at 33 CFR 328.3(c)(1) as “areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.” In 1987 the Corps published the Wetland Manual to guide its field personnel in determining jurisdictional wetland boundaries. The methodology set forth in the Wetland Manual and the Arid West Supplement generally require that, in order to be considered a wetland, the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of an area exhibit at least minimal hydric characteristics. While the Wetland Manual and Arid West Supplement provide great detail in methodology and allow for varying special conditions, a wetland should normally meet each of the following three criteria:
• More than 50 percent of the dominant plant species at the site must be hydrophytic in nature as published in the most current national wetland plant list; • Soils must exhibit physical and/or chemical characteristics indicative of permanent or periodic saturation (e.g., a gleyed color, or mottles with a matrix of low chroma 15 indicating a relatively consistent fluctuation between aerobic and anaerobic conditions); and
• Whereas the Wetland Manual requires that hydrologic characteristics indicate that the ground is saturated to within 12 inches of the surface for at least five percent of the growing season during a normal rainfall year, the Arid West Supplement does not include a quantitative criterion with the exception for areas with “problematic hydrophytic vegetation”, which require a minimum of 14 days of ponding to be considered a wetland.

3.3.2 Regional Water Quality Control Board
The State Water Resource Control Board and each of its nine Regional Boards regulate the discharge of waste (dredged or fill material) into waters of the United States1 and waters of the state. Waters of the United States are defined above in Section II.A and waters of the state are defined as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state” (California Water Code 13050[e]).

Section 401 of the CWA requires certification for any federal permit or license authorizing impacts to waters of the U.S. (i.e., waters that are within federal jurisdiction), such as Section 404 of the CWA and Section 10 of the Safe Rivers and Harbors Act, to ensure that the impacts do not violate state water quality standards. When a project could impact waters outside of federal jurisdiction, the Regional Board has the authority under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act to issue Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) to ensure that impacts do not violate state water quality standards. Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certifications, WDRs, and waivers of WDRs are also referred to as orders or permits.

State Wetland Definition
The Water Boards define an area as wetland2 as follows: “An area is wetland if, under normal circumstances, (1) the area has continuous or recurrent saturation of the upper substrate caused by groundwater, or shallow surface water, or both; (2) the duration of such saturation is sufficient to cause anaerobic conditions in the upper substrate; and (3) the area’s vegetation is dominated by hydrophytes or the area lacks vegetation.” The following wetlands are waters of the state:
1 Therefore, wetlands that meet the current definition, or any historic definition, of waters of the U.S. are waters of the state. In 2000, the State Water Resources Control Board determined that all waters of the U.S. are also waters of the state by regulation, prior to any regulatory or judicial limitations on the federal definition of waters of the U.S. (California Code or Regulations title 23, section 3831(w)). This regulation has remained in effect despite subsequent changes to the federal definition. Therefore, waters of the state includes features that have been determined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to be “waters of the U.S.” in an approved jurisdictional determination; “waters of the U.S.” identified in an aquatic resource report verified by the Corps upon which a permitting decision was based; and features that are consistent with any current or historic final judicial interpretation of “waters of the U.S.” or any current or historic federal regulation defining “waters of the U.S.” under the federal Clean Water Act. 2 State Water Resources Control Board. 2019. State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State. [For Inclusion in the Water Quality Control Plans for Inland Surface Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries and Ocean Waters of California]. 16 1. Natural wetlands;

2. Wetlands created by modification of a surface water of the state;3 and

3. Artificial wetlands4 that meet any of the following criteria:
a. Approved by an agency as compensatory mitigation for impacts to other waters of the state, except where the approving agency explicitly identifies the mitigation as being of limited duration;
b. Specifically identified in a water quality control plan as a wetland or other water of the state;
c. Resulted from historic human activity, is not subject to ongoing operation and maintenance, and has become a relatively permanent part of the natural landscape; or
d. Greater than or equal to one acre in size, unless the artificial wetland was constructed, and is currently used and maintained, primarily for one or more of the following purposes (i.e., the following artificial wetlands are not waters of the state unless they also satisfy the criteria set forth in 2, 3a, or 3b):
i. Industrial or municipal wastewater treatment or disposal, ii. Settling of sediment,
iii. Detention, retention, infiltration, or treatment of stormwater runoff and other pollutants or runoff subject to regulation under a municipal, construction, or industrial stormwater permitting program, iv. Treatment of surface waters,
v. Agricultural crop irrigation or stock watering,
vi. Fire suppression,
vii. Industrial processing or cooling,
viii. Active surface mining – even if the site is managed for interim wetlands functions and values,
ix. Log storage,
x. Treatment, storage, or distribution of recycled water, or xi. Maximizing groundwater recharge (this does not include wetlands that have incidental groundwater recharge benefits); or
xii. Fields flooded for rice growing.5
3 “Created by modification of a surface water of the state” means that the wetland that is being evaluated was created by modifying an area that was a surface water of the state at the time of such modification. It does not include a wetland that is created in a location where a water of the state had existed historically, but had already been completely eliminated at some time prior to the creation of the wetland. The wetland being evaluated does not become a water of the state due solely to a diversion of water from a different water of the state. 4 Artificial wetlands are wetlands that result from human activity. 5 Fields used for the cultivation of rice (including wild rice) that have not been abandoned due to five consecutive years of non-use for the cultivation of rice (including wild rice) that are determined to be a water of the state in accordance with these Procedures shall not have beneficial use designations applied to them through the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins, except as otherwise required by federal law for fields that are considered to be waters of the United States. Further, agricultural inputs legally applied to fields used for the cultivation of rice (including wild rice) shall not constitute a discharge of waste to a water of the state.

Agricultural inputs that migrate to a surface water or groundwater may be considered a discharge of waste and are 17 All artificial wetlands that are less than an acre in size and do not satisfy the criteria set forth in 2, 3.a, 3.b, or 3.c are not waters of the state. If an aquatic feature meets the wetland definition, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate that the wetland is not a water of the state.

3.3.3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Pursuant to Division 2, Chapter 6, Sections 1600-1603 of the California Fish and Game Code, the CDFW regulates all diversions, obstructions, or changes to the natural flow or bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake, which supports fish or wildlife.

CDFW defines a stream (including creeks and rivers) as “a body of water that flows at least periodically or intermittently through a bed or channel having banks and supports fish or other aquatic life. This includes watercourses having surface or subsurface flow that supports or has supported riparian vegetation.” CDFW's definition of “lake” includes “natural lakes or manmade reservoirs.” CDFW also defines a stream as “a body of water that flows, or has flowed, over a given course during the historic hydrologic regime, and where the width of its course can reasonably be identified by physical or biological indicators.” It is important to note that the Fish and Game Code defines fish as “a wild fish, mollusk, crustacean, invertebrate, amphibian, or part, spawn, or ovum of any of those animals” (FGC Division 0.5, Chapter 1, section 45), and wildlife as “all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, reptiles, and related ecological communities, including the habitat upon which the wildlife depends for its continued viability” (FGC Division 0.5, Chapter 1, section 89.5).

Furthermore, Division 2, Chapter 5, Article 6, Section 1600 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code does not limit jurisdiction to areas defined by specific flow events, seasonal changes in water flow, or presence/absence of vegetation types or communities.

3.3.4 Wetlands Defined Under the California Coastal Act In accordance with definitions in the Coastal Act, wetlands are defined as follows:

WETLAND - is defined by Section 30121 of the Coastal Act as lands within the coastal zone which may be covered periodically or permanently with shallow water and include saltwater marshes, freshwater marshes, open or closed brackish water marshes, swamps, mudflats, and fens. The definition of wetland is further detailed by Section 13577 (b)(1) of the California Code of Regulations as land where the water table is at, near, or above the land surface long enough to promote the formation of hydric soils or to support the growth of hydrophytes, and shall also include those types of wetlands where vegetation is lacking and soil is poorly developed or absent as a result of frequent and drastic fluctuations of surface water levels, wave action, water flow, turbidity or high concentrations of subject to waste discharge requirements or waivers of such requirements pursuant to the Water Board’s authority to issue or waive waste discharge requirements or take other actions as applicable. 18 salts or other substances in the substrate. Such wetlands can be recognized by the presence of surface water or saturated substrate at some time during each year and their location within, or adjacent to vegetated wetlands or deep-water habitats.

According to the Coastal Commission, the presence of any one of three wetland indicators (hydrology, hydrophytes, or hydric soils) qualifies an area as a wetland under this definition.

Furthermore, the Coastal Commission establishes the upland limit of a wetland as:
a. the boundary between land with predominantly hydrophytic cover and land with predominantly mesophytic or xerophytic cover
b. the boundary between soil that is predominantly hydric and soil that is predominantly nonhydric; or
c. in the case of wetlands without vegetation or soils, the boundary between land that is flooded or saturated at some time during years of normal precipitation, and land that is not (14 CCR Section 13577).

The Coastal Commission’s determination of the presence of a “One Parameter Wetland” typically follows the methods contained U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual6 (Wetland Manual) and more recently, the 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0) (AWS v.2.0).7 It should be noted, however, that the Army Corps of Engineers and the Wetland Manual requires the presence of all three factors—wetlands hydrology, hydric soils, and a predominance of hydrophytic vegetation—to determine the presence and delineate the boundaries of a federal wetland. While the Coastal Commission relies on the federal manuals to establish the presence of any of the three parameters, according to Coastal Commission staff the presence of a single parameter (e.g., a predominance of wetland vegetation) is typically sufficient to demonstrate the presence of a wetland and for the Coastal Commission to make a presumptive finding for the presence of wetlands.

3.4 Local Approvals

4.2.1 City of Long Beach
The Project Site is located in the coastal zone, which is under the permitting authority of the City of Long Beach through the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). The Project site is also located within the SEASP area, which is subject to policies from the LCP and California Coastal Act incorporated into the SEASP. The California Coastal Commission certified the SEASP on September 28, 2021; accordingly, development consistent with SEASP may be approved by the City of Long Beach without further input from the Coastal Commission. 6 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 7 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2008. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region. Ed. J.S. Wakeley, R.W. Lichvar, and C.V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-08-28. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. 19 The majority of the Project site is located within an area designated by Section 4.4.5 of SEASP as Mixed-Use Community Core:

This area is envisioned as the primary activity center in the SEASP area and provides for a mix of uses including residential, regional retail, hotel, and office uses. The focus of this designation is on creating a pedestrian scale environment, including increased connectivity, gathering spaces, and linkages to the marina and wetlands. Permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for this designation are identified in Table 4-4 of SEASP, Permitted Uses.

The improvements to Studebaker Road are located in an area designated as Right-of-Way.

Projects located within 100 feet of wetlands or Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas are subject to the following SEASP Policies:

Policy 5.17: Projects Within 100 Feet of Wetlands, ESHA, or Sensitive Coastal Habitat Areas
For projects located on a property where any portion of that property is located within 100 feet of any designated wetland or ESHA, as defined in this chapter, or within 100 feet of a potential wetland or ESHA based on site specific characteristics or nearby wetland delineations, or within 100 feet of a sensitive coastal habitat area, as defined in this chapter, the property owner shall be required to submit a CDP application complete with biological surveys and a wetland delineation, if applicable, and a Site Plan Review application, and shall be consistent with the provisions of this chapter.

Policy 5.18: Standards Applicable to All Areas Adjacent to Jurisdictional Waters, ESHA and Wetlands
Development projects within 100 feet of Coastal Act wetlands or environmentally sensitive habitat (ESHA), and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands, and Recreation land use shall comply with the following:
• Prior to approval of a trails/access plan within or adjacent to wetlands or ESHA, the location, design, and text for urban-open space interface signage shall be developed. The signage shall be located at all pedestrian access points. The signage shall educate users on the responsibilities associated with the open space interface and shall address relevant issues, including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants. • Prior to approval of any development adjacent to the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands, and Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 footcandles at the edge of the habitat. This would ensure that spill light does not result in exposure of artificial light at levels exceeding the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.5 foot-candles).
20 • Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant and/or subsequent builder shall prepare an urban-open space interface brochure to be approved by the Long Beach Development Services Department to educate residents on the responsibilities associated with living near sensitive biological habitat. The brochure shall address relevant issues, including noise, dark skies, nesting birds, bird-safe buildings, and the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants. The approved brochure, along with attachments, shall be included as part of the rental/lease agreements and as part of the sales literature for future developments.

Policy 5.19: Wetland Conservation and Monitoring Fund
The City shall establish a Wetland Conservation and Monitoring Fund and establish fees pursuant to a Property Analysis Record (PAR). Each development or redevelopment shall contribute its fair share based on the size of the development to this fund, which will be created to provide restoration and long-term management to the publicly owned wetlands within the SEASP Plan area. Fees shall be assessed on the project through conditions of approval of the Coastal Development Permit. When an agency or non-profit corporation accepts permanent management responsibilities of the wetlands, the Fund may be transferred to that agency or corporation.

Policy 5.27:

A habitat corridor shall be required from 2nd Street to the San Gabriel River upon application for redevelopment of the site (restoration or abandonment of oil operations). Such corridor shall be not less than 400 feet in width (when measured from the existing buildings in the Marketplace) and shall include Shopkeeper Road.

Policy 5.32:

In addition to the standards above, new development located on properties that contain or are located within 100 feet of wetlands, ESHA, or sensitive coastal habitat areas (including open water), as defined in this chapter, shall also comply with the following:

A. Lighting shall be designed to achieve the minimum degree of illumination necessary for public safety, minimize light trespass into adjacent non-target areas, and limit the illumination of open space and sensitive coastal habitat areas to the maximum extent feasible. Lighting shall be downward directed, shielded, energy efficient, dark skycompatible, and shall incorporate state-of-the-art improvements in lighting technology when replaced thereafter. Replacement bulbs or fixtures shall be upgraded to incorporate best available technology over the life of the installation. Programmable timing devices shall be utilized to turn off unnecessary lights where feasible. Illuminated signs shall not be allowed.
21 B. Minimize the number of and, whenever possible, co-locate rooftop antennas and other rooftop structures.

C. Monopole structures or antennas shall not include guy wires.

D. Amplified music shall not be permitted.

E. The use of insecticides, herbicides, anticoagulant rodenticides or any toxic chemical substance that has the potential to significantly degrade biological resources shall be prohibited, except where necessary to protect or enhance the habitat itself, such as for eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, and where there are no feasible alternatives that would result in fewer adverse effects to the habitat value of the site. Application of such chemical substances shall not take place during the winter season or when rain is predicted within a week of application. Herbicide application necessary to prevent regrowth of highly invasive exotic vegetation such as giant reed/cane (Arundo donax) shall be restricted to the best available and least-toxic product and method in order to minimize adverse impacts to wildlife and the potential for introduction of herbicide into the aquatic environment or onto adjacent non-targeted vegetation. In no instance shall herbicide application occur if wind speeds on site are greater than five miles per hour or 48 hours prior to predicted rain. In the event that rain does occur, herbicide application shall not resume again until 72 hours after rain.

4.0 RESULTS
This section provides the results of general biological surveys, vegetation mapping, and habitat assessments and for special-status plants and animals, and an evaluation for the presence of Waters of the United States (including wetlands) subject to the jurisdiction of the Corps and Regional Board, streams (including riparian vegetation) and lakes subject to the jurisdiction of CDFW, and wetlands subject to the jurisdiction of the City of Long Beach and California Coastal Commission.

4.1 Existing Conditions
The Project site consists of an existing development with two two-story office buildings, asphalt surface parking, and ornamental landscaping; the portion of Studebaker Road adjacent to the commercial development; and the northwest edge of the Pumpkin Patch site within the public right of way, which consists of disturbed lands. The Study Area includes an additional 100-foot-wide portion of the Pumpkin Patch property, which was assessed for potential wetlands in order to comply with Coastal Act and SEASP policies.

No native vegetation communities occur within the Study Area, and vegetation generally consists of ornamental shrubs and trees and non-native weedy species. The topography is flat, with elevations ranging from 10 feet to 14 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). Soils within the Study Area consist of Urban land, 0 to 2 percent slopes, dredged fill substratum; and Bolsa, drained-Typic Xerothents, dredged spoil-Typic Fluvaquents complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes [Exhibit 5 – Soil Map]. 22 4.2 Vegetation Mapping
During vegetation mapping of the Study Area, five different land cover types/vegetation alliances were identified. Table 4-1 provides a summary of land cover/vegetation types and the corresponding acreage. Detailed descriptions of each vegetation/cover type follow the table. A Vegetation Map is attached as Exhibit 4. Photographs depicting the various vegetation types and land uses are attached as Exhibit 5.

Table 4-1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Cover Types for the Project Site Vegetation/Land Use Type
Project
Site
(Acres)
100-
Foot
Buffer
(Acres)
Total
Study
Area
(Acres)
Avena spp. – Bromus spp. seminatural
alliance/Mesembryanthemum spp. –
Carpobrotus spp. semi-natural alliance

0.14 0.18 0.32
Developed 4.57 – 4.57
Disturbed 0.59 1.14 1.73
Eucalyptus 0.02 0.13 0.15
Ornamental 0.43 – 0.43
Total 5.75 1.45 7.20

4.2.1 Avena spp. – Bromus spp. herbaceous semi-natural alliance (42.026.00) Mesembryanthemum spp. – Carpobrotus spp. herbaceous semi-natural alliance (21.200.00) Mosaic
Approximately 0.14 acres at the southeast edge of the Project site and partially extending into the Pumpkin Patch, as well as 0.18 acre of the 100-foot buffer, are vegetated with a mosaic of two vegetation alliances interspersed with bare ground: the Avena spp. – Bromus spp. semi-natural alliance and the Mesembryanthemum spp. – Carpobrotus spp. herbaceous semi-natural alliance, neither of which have a global or state rarity ranking. As described, the Avena spp. – Bromus spp. semi-natural alliance is highly diverse throughout California which is reflected in the “Membership Rules” in the MCVII as provided below.

The Avena spp. – Bromus spp. semi-natural alliance membership rules include the following: (1) Bromus diandrus has greater than 60 percent relative cover with other non-natives in herbaceous layer and with a variety of annuals at low cover; (2) Avena fatua has greater than 50 percent relative cover, and native herbs have less than 10 percent relative cover in the herbaceous layer, (3) Avena spp. has greater than 50 percent relative cover, and native herbs have less than 10 percent relative cover in the herbaceous layer, (4) Avena spp. has greater than 75 percent relative cover; other non-native or native plants have less than 5 percent absolute cover, if present, in the herbaceous layer, (5) Brachypodium distachyon has less than 60 percent relative cover in the herbaceous layer, (6) Bromus diandrus, B. hordeaceus, and/or Brachypodium distachyon have 23 greater than 80 percent relative cover separately or co-dominant with non-natives; natives usually with low or insignificant cover; (7) Bromus hordeaceus has greater than 50 percent relative cover in the herbaceous layer, (8) Avena, Brachypodium, Briza, Bromus diandrus, Bromus hordeaceus and/or Erodium have greater than 50 percent relative cover individually or in combination, and (9) Avena, Brachypodium, Briza, Bromus, Erodium and/or Hypochaeris have greater than 30 percent relative cover individually, or share greater than 50 percent relative cover in the herbaceous layer.

The Mesembryanthemum spp. – Carpobrotus spp. herbaceous semi-natural alliance membership rules include the following: (1) Carpobrotus edulis, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum, or other ice plant strongly dominant (greater than 80 percent relative cover) close to the coast, and (2) Carpobrotus and/or Mesembryanthemum greater than 50 percent relative cover on bluffs, dunes, or disturbed lands.

Within the subject areas of vegetation, these two alliances are distributed in a patchy mosaic along with areas of bare ground. Where grasses and other non-native herbs are dominant, relative cover of brome grasses in the herbaceous layer is ranges from 40 to 100 percent. Where ice plant is dominant, relative cover ranges from 50 to 100 percent. • Bromus diandrus – Mixed herbs (42.026.11)
The Avena spp. – Bromus spp. semi-natural alliance areas in the Study Area are best characterized as the Bromus diandrus – Mixed herbs association (42.026.11). Dominant species include ripgut brome (Bromus diandrus) and red brome (Bromus rubens). Subdominant species include cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), hare barley (Hordeum murinum ssp. leporinum), and yellow sweet clover (Melilotus indica). Other component species include small fescue (Festuca microstachys), five-hook bassia (Bassia hyssopifolia), salt sand spurry (Spergularia marina), spiny sow thistle (Sonchus asper), and hood canarygrass (Phalaris paradoxa). • Mesembryanthemum spp. – Carpobrotus spp. Herbaceous semi-natural alliance (21.200.00)
These areas consist of nearly monocultural small-flowered ice plant (Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum), or ice plant mixed with the species described above for the Bromus diandrus – Mixed herbs association.

4.2.2 Developed
Approximately 4.57 acres of the Project site consists of commercial buildings, asphalt parking areas, walkways, and other appurtenant structures and facilities.

4.2.3 Disturbed
Approximately 0.59 acre of the Project site and 1.14 acres of the 100-foot buffer, including most of the Pumpkin Patch, consists of disturbed lands that are sparsely vegetated or unvegetated.

These areas are subject to frequent disturbance from seasonal strawberry, pumpkin, and 24 Christmas tree sales events. The soils are compacted, and gravel has been deposited in some areas to improve vehicular access as much of the site is used for parking during the various commercial uses for the site.

4.2.4 Eucalyptus
Approximately 0.02 acre of the Project site and 0.13 acre of the 100-foot buffer at the western end of the Study Area consists of a stand of eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus sp.).

4.2.5 Ornamental
Ornamental vegetation covers approximately 0.43 acre of the Project site and consists primarily of turf grass and landscape trees and shrubs. Component species include London plane trees (Platanus x hispanica), Indian hawthorne (Rhaphiolepis indica), English ivy (Hedera helix), pittosporum (Pittosporum sp.), rusty fig (Ficus rubiginosa), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), and Canary Island date palm (Phoenix canariensis).

4.3 Special-Status Vegetation Communities
The CNDDB identifies one special-status vegetation community, southern coastal salt marsh, for the Los Alamitos, CA quadrangle map. The Project site does not contain any special-status vegetation types, including those identified by the CNDDB. Additionally, the Project site does not contain any vegetation communities that would be considered an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA).

4.4 Special-Status Plants
No special-status plants were detected at the Project site. Table 4-2 provides a list of specialstatus plants evaluated for the Project site through general biological surveys and habitat assessments. Species were evaluated based on the following factors: 1) species identified by the CNDDB and CNPS as occurring (either currently or historically) on or in the vicinity of the Project site, and 2) any other special-status plants that are known to occur within the vicinity of the Project site, or for which potentially suitable habitat occurs within the site.

Table 4-2. Special-Status Plants Evaluated for the Project Site Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Aphanisma
Aphanisma blitoides
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal scrub. On bluffs and slopes
near the ocean in sandy or clay
soils.

Does not occur
Blochman’s dudleya
Dudleya blochmanae ssp.
blochmanae
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Coastal bluff scrub, chaparral,
coastal scrub, valley and foothill
grassland. Rocky, often clay or
serpentinite soils.

Does not occur
25 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
California box-thorn
Lycium californicum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. Does not occur
California Orcutt grass
Orcuttia californica
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Vernal pools Does not occur
Catalina crossosoma
Crossosoma californicum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Rocky soils in chaparral and
coastal scrub
Does not occur
Chaparral sand verbena
Abronia villosa var. aurita
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Sandy soils in chaparral, coastal
sage scrub.

Does not occur
Cliff spurge
Euphorbia misera
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub,
mojavean desert scrub. Rocky
soils.

Does not occur
Coast woolly-heads
Nemacaulis denudata var.
denudata
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal dunes. Does not occur
Coulter’s goldfields
Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR:1B.1
Playas, vernal pools, marshes and
swamps (coastal salt).

Does not occur
Coulter’s saltbush
Atriplex coulteri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland. Occurring on
alkaline or clay soils.

Does not occur
Davidson’s saltscale
Atriplex serenana var.
davidsonii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Alkaline soils in coastal sage scrub,
coastal bluff scrub.

Does not occur
Decumbent goldenbush
Isocoma menziesii var.
decumbens
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub (sandy,
often in disturbed areas)
Does not occur
Estuary seablite
Suaeda esteroa
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal salt marsh and swamps.

Occurs in sandy soils.

Does not occur
Gambel’s water cress
Nasturtium gambellii
Federal: FE
State: ST
CRPR: 1B.1
Marshes and swamps. Does not occur
Giardner’s yampah
Perideridia gairdneri ssp.
gairdneri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Broadleafed upland forest,
chaparral, coastal prairie, valley
and foothill grassland, vernal pools.

Vernally mesic soils.

Does not occur
Golden-spined cereus
Bergerocactus emoryi
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Closed-cone coniferous forest,
chaparral, coastal scrub. Sandy
soils.

Does not occur
Island green dudleya
Dudleya virens ssp. insularis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Rocky soils in coastal bluff scrub
and coastal scrub.

Does not occur
26 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Los Angeles sunflower
Helianthus nuttallii ssp.
parishii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1A
Salt and freshwater marshes,
historically in Los Angeles,
Orange, Riverside and San
Bernardino Counties. Presumed to
be extinct.

Does not occur
Lyon’s pentachaeta
Pentachaeta lyonii
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Chaparral (openings), coastal sage
scrub, valley and foothill grassland.

Does not occur
Many-stemmed dudleya
Dudleya multicaulis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Chaparral, coastal sage scrub,
valley and foothill grassland.

Often occurring in clay soils.

Does not occur
Mud nama
Nama stenocarpa
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Vernal pools and freshwater
seasonal ponds.

Does not occur
Palmer’s grapplinghook
Harpagonella palmeri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and
foothill grassland. Clay soils.

Does not occur
Parish’s brittlescale
Atriplex parishii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Chenopod scrub, playas, vernal
pools.

Does not occur
Prostrate navarretia
Navarretia prostrata
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal sage scrub, valley and
foothill grassland (alkaline), vernal
pools. Occurring in mesic soils.

Does not occur
Rayless ragwort
Senecio aphanactis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 2B.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub. Sometimes alkaline
soils.

Does not occur
Robinson’s pepper-grass
Lepidium virginicum var.
robinsonii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.3
Chaparral, coastal scrub. Does not occur
Salt marsh bird’s-beak
Chloropyron maritimum ssp.
maritimum
Federal: FE
State: SE
CRPR:1B.2
Coastal dune, coastal salt marshes
and swamps.

Does not occur
San Bernardino aster
Symphyotrichum defoliatum
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR:1B.2
Meadows and seeps, marshes and
swamps, coastal scrub, cismontane
woodland, lower montane
coniferous forest, grassland.

Vernally mesic grassland or near
ditches, streams and springs;
disturbed areas.

Does not occur
San Fernando Valley
spineflower
Chorizanthe parryi var.
fernandina
Federal: None
State: SE
CRPR: 1B.1
Coastal sage scrub, occurring on
sandy soils.

Does not occur
Sanford’s arrowhead
Sagittaria sanfordii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Marshes and swamps. Does not occur
Santa Barbara morning-glory
Calystegia sepium ssp.
binghamiae
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1A
Coastal marshes. Does not occur
Santa Catalina Island desertthorn
Lycium brevipes var. hassei
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 3.1
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub. Does not occur
27 Species Status Habitat Potential for
Occurrence
Brewer’s calandrinia
Calandrinia breweri
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub,
valley and foothill grassland. Sandy
soils.

Does not occur
South coast saltscale
Atriplex pacifica
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
coastal sage scrub, playas.

Does not occur
Southern tarplant
Centromadia parryi ssp.
australis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 1B.1
Disturbed habitats, margins of
marshes and swamps, vernally
mesic valley and foothill grassland,
vernal pools.

Does not occur in the
Study Area. Previously
detected at northeast
corner of Pumpkin Patch
site well removed from
the 100-foot buffer
Southwestern spiny rush
Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Mesic coastal dunes, alkaline
meadows and seeps, coastal salt
marshes and swamps.

Does not occur
Ventura Marsh milk-vetch
Astragalus pycnostachyus var.
lanosissimus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CNPS: List
1B.1
Coastal salt marsh. Within reach of
high tide or protected by barrier
beaches, more rarely near seeps on
sandy bluffs.

Does not occur
Western dichondra
Dichondra occidentalis
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Chaparral, cismontane woodland,
coastal scrub, valley and foothill
grassland.

Does not occur
Wooly seablite
Suaeda taxifolia
Federal: None
State: None
CRPR: 4.2
Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes,
margins of coastal salt marshes and
swamps.

Does not occur
STATUS
Federal State
FE – Federally Endangered SE – State Endangered
FT – Federally Threatened ST – State Threatened
FC – Federal Candidate
CNPS
Rank 1A – Plants presumed extirpated in California and either rare or extinct elsewhere.

Rank 1B – Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California and elsewhere.

Rank 2A – Plants presumed extirpated in California, but common elsewhere.

Rank 2B – Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California, but more common elsewhere.

Rank 3 – Plants about which more information is needed (a review list).

Rank 4 – Plants of limited distribution (a watch list).

Threat Code extension
.1 – Seriously endangered in California (over 80% occurrences threatened) .2 – Fairly endangered in California (20-80% occurrences threatened) .3 – Not very endangered in California (<20% of occurrences threatened or no current threats known) 28 OCCURRENCE
 Does not occur – The site does not contain habitat for the species and/or the site does not occur within the geographic range of the species.
 Confirmed absent – The site contains suitable habitat for the species, but the species has been confirmed absent through focused surveys.
 Not expected to occur – The species is not expected to occur onsite due to low habitat quality, however absence cannot be ruled out.
 Potential to occur – The species has a potential to occur based on suitable habitat, however its presence/absence has not been confirmed.
 Confirmed present – The species was detected onsite incidentally or through focused surveys

4.5 Special-Status Animals
No special-status animals were detected at the Project site, and none are expected to occur due to lack of suitable habitat. Table 4-3 provides a list of special-status animals evaluated for the Project site through general biological surveys, habitat assessments, and focused surveys.

Species were evaluated based on the following factors, including: 1) species identified by the CNDDB as occurring (either currently or historically) on or in the vicinity of the Project site, and 2) any other special-status animals that are known to occur within the vicinity of the Project site, for which potentially suitable habitat occurs on the site.

Table 4-3. Special Status Animals Evaluated for the Project Site Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for
Occurrence

INVERTEBRATES
Crotch bumble bee
Bombus crotchii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Relatively warm and dry sites,
including the inner Coast Range of
California and margins of the
Mojave Desert.

Does not occur
Dorothy’s El Segundo Dune
weevil
Trigonoscuta dorothea
dorothea
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Sand dunes in El Segundo, CA. Does not occur
Mimic tryonia (California
brackishwater snail)
Tryonia imitator
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Coastal areas with brackish waters. Does not occur
Monarch – California
overwintering population
Danaus plexippus pop. 1
Federal: FC
State: None
CDFW: None
Roosts in winter in wind-protected
tree groves along the California
coast from northern Mendocino to
Baja California, Mexico.

Does not occur
Palos Verdes blue butterfly
Glaucopsyche lygdamus
palosverdesensis
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Locoweed and deerweed in the
Palos Verdes Peninsula.

Does not occur
Salt marsh wandering skipper
Panoquina errans
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Coastal salt marsh and coastal
strand areas dominated by saltgrass.

Does not occur
San Diego fairy shrimp
Branchinecta sandiegonensis
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Seasonal vernal pools. Does not occur
29 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Sandy beach tiger beetle
Cicindela hirticollis gravida
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Inhabits areas adjacent to nonbrackish water; prefers clean, dry, light-colored sand in the upper
zone. Larvae burrow into moist
sand not affected by wave action.

Does not occur
Senile tiger beetle
Cicindela senilis frosti
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Open, unvegetated areas in or near
salt marshes.

Does not occur
Riverside fairy shrimp
Streptocephalus wootoni
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: None
Deep seasonal vernal pools, with
warm water, and low to moderate
dissolved solids, that remained
filled for extended periods of time.

Annual grasslands or patches.

Does not occur
Western beach tiger beetle
Cicindela latesignata
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Forages in open unvegetated areas
such as marsh pannes and levees.

Larvae burrow in moist
unvegetated substrates.

Does not occur
Western tidal-flat tiger beetle
Habroscelimorpha gabbii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
Open, unvegetated areas in or near
salt marshes.

Does not occur

AMPHIBIANS
Arroyo toad
Bufo californicus
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Historically along length of
drainages; currently in headwaters,
sandy washes and arroyos grown to
willows, cottonwoods or
sycamores.

Does not occur
California red-legged frog
Rana draytonii
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Permanent flowing water sources,
including marshes, streams, lakes
ponds; woodland or valley foothill
grasslands; sufficient vegetative
cover
Does not occur
Western spadefoot toad
Spea hammondii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Coastal sage scrub, vernal pools,
and grasslands; breeds in associated
temporary pools and riparian areas.

Does not occur

REPTILES
Coast-horned lizard
Phrynosoma blainvilli
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of vegetation
types including coastal sage scrub,
chaparral, annual grassland, oak
woodland, and riparian woodlands.

Does not occur
Coast patch-nosed snake
Salvadora hexalepis
virgultea
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Open areas within coastal sage
scrub, chaparral, grassland, desert
scrub, washes, sand flats, & rocky
areas.

Does not occur
Orange-throated whiptail
Aspidoscelis hyperythra
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Inhabits low-elevation coastal scrub,
chaparral, and valley-foothill
hardwood habitats. Prefers washes
& other sandy areas with patches of
brush & rocks. Perennial plants
necessary for its major food,
termites.

Does not occur
30 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
East Pacific green sea turtle
Chelonia mydas
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: None
Green turtles are generally found in
fairly shallow waters (except when
migrating) inside reefs, bays, and
inlets. The turtles are attracted to
lagoons and shoals with an
abundance of seagrass and algae.

Does not occur
Red diamond rattlesnake
Crotalus ruber
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Chapparal, woodland, grassland, &
desert areas from coastal San Diego
County to the eastern slopes of the
mountains. Occurs in rocky areas &
dense vegetation. Needs rodent
burrows, cracks in rocks or surface
cover objects.

Does not occur
San Diego horned lizard
Phrynosoma coronatum
blainvillei
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of vegetation
types including coastal sage scrub,
chaparral, annual grassland, oak
woodland, and riparian woodlands.

Sandy soils.

Does not occur
Southern California legless
lizard
Anniella stebbinsi
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Sparse coastal sage scrub,
chaparral, grassland, riparian and
woodland habitats within moist
sandy soil.

Does not occur
Western pond turtle
Emys marmorata
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Slow-moving permanent or
intermittent streams, small ponds
and lakes, reservoirs, abandoned
gravel pits, permanent and
ephemeral shallow wetlands, stock
ponds, and treatment lagoons.

Abundant basking sites and cover
necessary, including logs, rocks,
submerged vegetation, and undercut
banks.

Does not occur
Two-striped garter snake
Thamnophis hammondii
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Highly aquatic. Found in freshwater
marshes and riparian habitats, in or
near permanent fresh water. Often
along streams with rocky beds and
riparian growth.

Does not occur
BIRDS
American peregrine falcon
Falco peregrinus anatum
Federal: None
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Near wetlands, lakes, rivers or other
water, on cliffs, banks, dunes,
mounds, also human-made
structures.

Does not occur
Bank swallow
Riparia riparia
Federal: None
State: ST
CDFW: None
Colonial nester; nests primarily in
riparian and other lowland habitats
west or the desert. Requires vertical
banks/cliffs with finetextured/sandy soils near streams, rivers, lakes, ocean to dig nesting
hole.

Does not occur
31 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Belding's savannah sparrow
Passerculus sandwichensis
beldingi
Federal: None
State: SE
CDFW: None
Coastal salt marshes. Nests in
Salicornia sp. and about margins of
tidal flats.

Does not occur
Bell’s sage sparrow
Artemisiospiza belli belli
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Nests in chaparral dominated by
fairly dense stands of chamise.

Found in coastal sage scrub in
south of range. Nest located on the
ground beneath a shrub or in a
shrub 6-18 inches above the
ground.

Does not occur
Black skimmer
Rynchops niger
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Nests on gravel bars, low islets and
sandy beaches, in unvegetated sites.

Does not occur
Burrowing owl
Athene cunicularia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Open, dry annual or perennial
grasslands, deserts & scrublands
characterized by low-growing
vegetation. Subterranean nester,
dependent upon burrowing
mammals, most notably, the
California ground squirrel.

Does not occur
California black rail
Laterallus jamaicensis
coturniculus
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: CFP
Salt marshes bordering larger bays,
coastal spartina marshes, inland in
dense, shortgrass, shallow marshes.

Does not occur
California brown pelican
Pelecanus occidentalis
californicus
Federal:

Delisted
State: Delisted
CDFW: CFP
Coastal, salt bays, ocean, beaches.

Nests on coastal islands of small to
moderate size that afford immunity
from attack by ground-dwelling
predators.

Does not occur
California horned lark
Eremophila alpestris actia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Coastal regions in Southern
California. Short-grass prairies
“bald” hills, mountain meadows,
open coastal plains, fallow grain
fields, alkali flats.

Does not occur
California least tern
Sterna antillarum browni
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Flat, vegetated substrates near the
coast. Occurs near estuaries, bays,
or harbors where fish is abundant.

Does not occur
Coastal cactus wren
Campylorhynchus
brunneicapillus couesi
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Southern California coastal sage
scrub. Wrens require tall opuntia
cactus for nesting and roosting.

Does not occur
Coastal California
gnatcatcher
Polioptila californica
Federal: FT
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Low elevation coastal sage scrub
and coastal bluff scrub.

Does not occur
Double-crested cormorant
Phalacrocorax auritus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Coasts, bays, lakes, rivers. Does not occur
Ferruginous hawk
Buteo regalis
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Only present as wintering
individuals. Prefers open
grasslands and agricultural areas.

Does not occur
32 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Golden Eagle
Aquila chrysaetos
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: CFP,
WL
In southern California, occupies
grasslands, brushlands, deserts, oak
savannas, open coniferous forests,
and montane valleys. Nests on rock
outcrops and ledges.

Does not occur
Least Bell’s vireo
Vireo bellii pusilus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: None
Summer resident of southern
California in low riparian in
vicinity of water or in dry river
bottoms. Nests placed along
margins of bushes or on twigs
projecting into pathways, usually
willow, Baccharis, mesquite.

Does not occur
California Ridgway’s rail
Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: CFP
Found in salt marshes where
cordgrass and pickleweed are the
dominant vegetation. Requires
dense growth of either pickleweed
or cordgrass for nesting or escape
cover, feeds on mollusks and
crustaceans.

Does not occur
Loggerhead shrike
Lanius ludovicianus
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Broken woodlands, savannah,
pinyon-juniper, Joshua tree &
riparian woodlands, desert oases,
scrub & washes. Prefers open
country for hunting with perches
for scanning and fairly dense shrubs
and brush for nesting.

Does not occur
Long-eared owl
Asio otus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Riparian bottomlands grown to tall
willows & cottonwoods; also belts
of live oak paralleling stream
courses. Require adjacent open land
productive of mice and presence of
old nests of crows.

Does not occur
Merlin
Falco columbarius
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Only present as wintering
individuals. Forages in a variety of
habitats including riparian areas
such as present on the site.

Does not occur
Northern harrier (nesting)
Circus hudsonius
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
A variety of habitats, including
open wetlands, grasslands, wet
pasture, old fields, dry uplands, and
croplands.

Does not occur
Osprey
Pandion haliaetus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: WL
Ocean shore, bays, fresh-water
lakes, and larger streams. Large
nests built in treetops within one
mile of a good fish-producing body
of water.

Does not occur
Tri-colored blackbird
Agelaius tricolor
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: SSC
Requires open water, protected
nesting
& foraging area with insect prey
within a few km of the colony.

Does not occur
33 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence
Short-eared owl
Asio flammeus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Found in swamplands, both fresh
and salt; lowland meadows;
irrigated alfalfa fields. Tule
patches/tall grass needed for
nesting/daytime seclusion. Nests on
dry ground in depression concealed
in vegetation.

Does not occur
Southwestern willow
flycatcher
Empidonax traillii extimus
Federal: FE
State: SE
CDFW: None
Riparian woodlands in southern
California.

Does not occur
Swainson’s Hawk
Buteo swainsoni
Federal: BCC
State: ST
CDFW: None
Breeding habitat consists of
grasslands with scattered trees,
juniper-sage flats, riparian areas,
savannahs, & agricultural or ranch
lands. Requires adjacent suitable
foraging areas such as grasslands or
alfalfa or grain fields that support
rodent populations.

Does not occur
Least bittern
Ixobrychus exilis
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Colonial nester in marshlands and
borders of ponds and reservoirs that
provide ample cover. Nests usually
placed low in tules over water.

Does not occur
Western snowy plover
Charadrius alexandrinus
nivosus
Federal: FT,
BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Sandy or gravelly beaches along the
coast, estuarine salt ponds, alkali
lakes, and at the Salton Sea.

Does not occur
Western yellow-billed
cuckoo
Coccyzus americanus
occidentalis
Federal: FT,
BCC
State: SE
CDFW: None
Dense, wide riparian woodlands
with well-developed understories.

Does not occur
White-tailed kite (nesting)
Elanus leucurus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: CFP
Low elevation open grasslands,
savannah-like habitats, agricultural
areas, wetlands, and oak
woodlands. Dense canopies used
for nesting and cover.

Does not occur
Yellow-breasted chat
Icteria virens
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Summer resident; inhabits riparian
thickets of willow & other brushy
tangles near watercourses. Nests in
low, dense riparian, consisting of
willow, blackberry, wild grape;
forages and nests within 10 ft of
ground.

Does not occur
Yellow warbler
Setophagia petechia
Federal: BCC
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Riparian plant associations. Prefers
willows, cottonwoods, aspens,
sycamores & alders for nesting &
foraging. Also nests in montane
shrubbery in open conifer forests.

Does not occur
34 Species Name Status Habitat Requirements Potential for Occurrence

MAMMALS
American badger
Taxidea taxus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in drier shrub, forest, and
herbaceous habitats. Needs open,
uncultivated ground and friable
soils for digging burrows. Preys on
burrowing rodents.

Does not occur
Big free-tailed bat
Nyctinomops macrotis
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
WBWG:MH
Occurs in low-lying arid areas in
Southern California. Roosts in high
cliffs or rocky outcrops.

Does not occur
Hoary bat
Lasiurus cinereus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
WBWG: M
Prefers open habitats or habitat
mosaics, with access to trees for
cover & open areas or habitat edges
for feeding. Roosts in dense foliage
of medium to large trees. Feeds
primarily on moths. Requires water.

Does not occur
Pacific pocket mouse
Perognathus longimembris
pacificus
Federal: FE
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Seems to prefer soils of fine
alluvial sands near the ocean.

Does not occur
San Diego desert woodrat
Neotoma lepida intermedia
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Occurs in a variety of shrub and
desert habitats, primarily associated
with rock outcrops, boulders, cacti,
or areas of dense undergrowth.

Does not occur
Silver-haired bat
Lasionycteris noctivagans
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: None
WBWG: M
Temperate, northern hardwoods
with ponds or streams nearby.

Roost in hollow snags and bird
nests.

Does not occur
South coast marsh vole
Microtus californicus
stephensi
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Tidal marshes in Los Angeles,
Orange and southern Ventura
Counties.

Does not occur
Southern California salt
marsh shrew
Sorex ornatus salicornicus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
Coastal marshes in Los Angeles,
Orange and southern Ventura
Counties. Requires dense
vegetation and woody debris for
cover.

Does not occur
Western mastiff bat
Eumops perotis californicus
Federal: None
State: None
CDFW: SSC
WBWG: H
Many open, semi-arid to arid
habitats, including conifer &
deciduous woodlands, coastal
scrub, grasslands, chaparral, etc.

Roosts in crevices in cliff faces,
high buildings, trees, & tunnels.

Does not occur
STATUS
Federal State
FE – Federally Endangered SE – State Endangered
FT – Federally Threatened ST – State Threatened
FPT – Federally Proposed Threatened SC– State Candidate FC – Federal Candidate FP – California Fully-Protected Species SSC – Species of Special Concern
35 Western Bat Working Group (WBWG)
H – High Priority
LM – Low-Medium Priority
M – Medium Priority
MH – Medium-High Priority

OCCURRENCE
 Does not occur – The site does not contain habitat for the species and/or the site does not occur within the geographic range of the species.
 Confirmed absent – The site contains suitable habitat for the species, but the species has been confirmed absent through focused surveys.
 Not expected to occur – The species is not expected to occur onsite due to low habitat quality, however absence cannot be ruled out.
 Potential to occur – The species has a potential to occur based on suitable habitat, however its presence/absence has not been confirmed.
 Confirmed present – The species was detected onsite incidentally or through focused surveys

4.5.2 Raptor Use
No raptor species, including special-status raptor species, were observed in the Study Area, and none are expected to occur except for occasional birds in transit. Due to the urban setting and developed nature of the Study Area and Project site, there is very limited habitat for raptor foraging and breeding.

The eucalyptus trees at the eastern end of the Study Area may provide roosting sites for more common urban-adapted species such as red-tailed hawk, but there is no suitable breeding or foraging habitat for special-status raptors in the Study Area.

4.6 Nesting Birds
The Project site contains trees, shrubs, and ground cover that provide suitable habitat for common species of nesting migratory birds. No sign of past or current nesting by wading birds or raptors was detected during the biological survey, which was conducted during the nesting bird season; however, there is very low potential for such nesting to occur in the future. Impacts to nesting birds are prohibited under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code.8

4.7 Wildlife Linkages/ Corridors and Nursery Sites
Habitat linkages are areas which provide a connection between two or more other habitat areas which are often larger or superior in quality to the linkage. Such linkage sites can be quite small or constricted, but may can be vital to the long-term health of connected habitats. Linkage 8 The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed in 50 C.F.R.

Part 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 C.F.R.21). In addition, sections 3505, 3503.5, and 3800 of the California Department of Fish and Game Code prohibit the take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. 36 values are often addressed in terms of “gene flow” between populations, with movement taking potentially many generations.

Corridors are similar to linkages but provide specific opportunities for individual animals to disperse or migrate between areas, generally extensive but otherwise partially or wholly separated regions. Adequate cover and tolerably low levels of disturbance are common requirements for corridors. Habitat in corridors may be quite different than that in the connected areas, but if used by the wildlife species of interest, the corridor will still function as desired.

Wildlife nurseries are sites where wildlife concentrate for hatching and/or raising young, such as rookeries, spawning areas, and bat colonies. Nurseries can be important to both special-status species as well as commonly occurring species.

Due to the developed nature and urban setting of the Study Area, it is not associated with any habitat linkages, wildlife corridors, or wildlife nurseries. It should be noted that this Project is not located in the area intended for the habitat corridor required by SEASP Policy 5.27.

4.8 Critical Habitat
The Study Area does not occur within USFWS designated critical habitat.

4.9 Jurisdictional Delineation
The Study Area does not contain any blue-line streams, jurisdictional waters, or wetlands as defined by the Clean Water Act or the California Coastal Act. A few areas of the Project site and 100-foot buffer exhibited ponding during the site visit on March 16, 2023, but these areas do not constitute jurisdictional wetlands. One such area is in an unmaintained section of a landscape planter shown in Exhibit 5, Photograph 5. The vegetation consists of a mix of native and nonnative species with wetland indicator statuses ranging from obligate (OBL) to upland (UPL), but this area does not constitute a wetland as it occurs in an unmaintained section of a landscape planter and is not a naturally occurring feature. A few localized areas of very shallow ponding were observed within the 100-foot buffer portion of the Study Area in the Pumpkin Patch, but these areas do not constitute wetlands, as the soils are compacted due to ongoing disturbance and tend to exhibit shallow ponding after any significant rainfall. The nearest potential wetlands are associated with the City of Long Beach Property Site (Marketplace Marsh) at least 194 feet north of the Project site, and the northeast edge of the Pumpkin Patch site approximately is 221 feet east of the Project site [Exhibit 6 – Potential SEASP Wetlands].

5.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following discussion examines the potential impacts to plant and wildlife resources that would occur as a result of the proposed project. Impacts (or effects) can occur in two forms, direct and indirect. Direct impacts are considered to be those that involve the loss, modification or disturbance of plant communities, which in turn, directly affect the flora and fauna of those habitats. Direct impacts also include the destruction of individual plants or animals, which may 37 also directly affect regional population numbers of a species or result in the physical isolation of populations thereby reducing genetic diversity and population stability.

Indirect impacts pertain to those impacts that result in a change to the physical environment, but which is not immediately related to a project. Indirect (or secondary) impacts are those that are reasonably foreseeable and caused by a project but occur at a different time or place. Indirect impacts can occur at the urban/wildland interface of projects, to biological resources located downstream from projects, and other off-site areas where the effects of the project may be experienced by plants and wildlife. Examples of indirect impacts include the effects of increases in ambient levels of noise or light; predation by domestic pets; competition with exotic plants and animals; introduction of toxics, including pesticides; and other human disturbances such as hiking, off-road vehicle use, unauthorized dumping, etc. Indirect impacts are often attributed to the subsequent day-to-day activities associated with project build-out, such as increased noise, the use of artificial light sources, and invasive ornamental plantings that may encroach into native areas. Indirect effects may be both short-term and long-term in their duration. These impacts are commonly referred to as “edge effects” and may result in a slow replacement of native plants by non-native invasives, as well as changes in the behavioral patterns of wildlife and reduced wildlife diversity and abundance in habitats adjacent to project sites.

Cumulative impacts refer to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. A cumulative impact can occur from multiple individual effects from the same project, or from several projects. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment resulting from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time.

5.1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)

5.1.1 Thresholds of Significance
Environmental impacts to biological resources are assessed using impact significance threshold criteria, which reflect the policy statement contained in CEQA, Section 21001(c) of the California Public Resources Code. Accordingly, the State Legislature has established it to be the policy of the State of California:
“Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man’s activities, ensure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities...”
Determining whether a project may have a significant effect, or impact, plays a critical role in the CEQA process. According to CEQA, Section 15064.7 (Thresholds of Significance), each public agency is encouraged to develop and adopt (by ordinance, resolution, rule, or regulation) thresholds of significance that the agency uses in the determination of the significance of environmental effects. A threshold of significance is an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance with which means the 38 effect will normally be determined to be significant by the agency and compliance with which means the effect normally will be determined to be less than significant. In the development of thresholds of significance for impacts to biological resources CEQA provides guidance primarily in Section 15065, Mandatory Findings of Significance, and the CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form. Section 15065(a) states that a project may have a significant effect where:
“The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or wildlife community, reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered, rare, or threatened species, ...”
Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis, impacts to biological resources are considered potentially significant (before considering offsetting mitigation measures) if one or more of the following criteria discussed below would result from implementation of the proposed project.

5.1.2 Criteria for Determining Significance Pursuant to CEQA Appendix G of the 2017 State CEQA guidelines indicate that a project may be deemed to have a significant effect on the environment if the project is likely to:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
39 5.2 Special-Status Species

5.2.1 Special-Status Plants
The proposed Project will not impact any special-status plant species.

5.2.2 Special-Status Animals
The proposed Project will not impact special-status animals.

5.3 Sensitive Vegetation Communities
Appendix G(a) of the CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.”
The proposed Project would permanently impact approximately 5.75 acres of lands. Permanent impacts include approximately 0.14 acre of Avena spp. – Bromus spp. seminatural alliance/Mesembryanthemum spp. – Carpobrotus spp. semi-natural alliance, 4.57 acres of developed lands, 0.59 acre of disturbed lands, 0.02 acre of eucalyptus, and 0.43 acre of ornamental vegetation. None of the vegetation communities or land cover types to be impacted by the Project are considered sensitive communities. Table 5-1 provides a summary of impacts to vegetation/land use types.

Table 5-1. Summary of Vegetation/Land Use Impacts
Vegetation/Land Use Type
Project Site
(Acres)
Avena spp. – Bromus spp. seminatural
alliance/Mesembryanthemum spp. –
Carpobrotus spp. semi-natural alliance

0.14 Developed 4.57
Disturbed 0.59
Eucalyptus 0.02
Ornamental 0.43
Total 5.75

5.4 Wetlands
Appendix G(c) of the State CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means.”
40 The Project site does not contain any state or federally protected wetlands, including wetlands as defined by the California Coastal Act. The nearest potential wetlands are located at least 194 feet from the Project site, and thus the Project is not subject to SEASP policies pertaining to wetlands [Exhibit 6].

5.5 Wildlife Movement and Native Wildlife Nursery Sites Appendix G(d) of the State CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.”
The Project site consists of an existing commercial development and the disturbed edge of the Pumpkin Patch and although there may be local wildlife movement through the Pumpkin Patch, Project impacts would be limited to the edge of the Pumpkin Patch immediately adjacent to Studebaker Road, and therefore would not interfere substantially with wildlife movement.

The Project site does not contain a native wildlife nursery site.

The project has the potential to impact active bird nests if vegetation is removed during the nesting season (Generally January 1 to September 30 when potential nesting habitat for wading birds and raptors is present, and February 1 to September 30 when no raptor or wading bird nesting habitat is present). Impacts to nesting birds are prohibited by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code.

Although impacts to native birds are prohibited by MBTA and similar provisions of California Fish and Game Code, impacts to native birds by the proposed Project would not be a significant impact under CEQA. The native birds with potential to nest on the Project site would be those that are extremely common to the region and highly adapted to human landscapes (e.g., house finch). The number of individuals potentially affected by the Project would not significantly affect regional or local populations of such species. A measure is identified in Section 6.0 of this report to avoid impacts to nesting birds.

Further, the proposed project would be landscaped with variety of plants species, including multiple tree varieties on the ground floor and on the pool deck. Trees in the landscape palette include western redbud (Cercis occidentalis), Catalina ironwood (Lyonothamnus floribundus), California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), hollyleaf cherry (Prunus ilicifolia), and Chitalpa (x Chitalpa tashkentensis). These trees could serve as new nesting opportunities for birds.

5.6 Local Policies or Ordinances
Appendix G(e) of the State CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance.”
41 The Project will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, including the policies set forth in SEASP, as no jurisdictional waters, wetlands, ESHA, or sensitive coastal habitat areas are located within 100 feet of the Project site.

5.7 Habitat Conservation Plans
Appendix G(f) of the State CEQA guidelines asks if a project is likely to “conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.” The Study Area does not occur within the area covered by any habitat conservation plans.

5.8 Impacts to Critical Habitat
The proposed Project will not impact lands designated as critical habitat by the USFWS.

5.9 Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
No jurisdictional waters occur within the defined Study Area, including the Project site and the 100-foot buffer that extends beyond the offsite improvement area into the Pumpkin Patch site.

5.10 Indirect Impacts to Biological Resources
In the context of biological resources, indirect effects are those effects associated with developing areas adjacent to adjacent native open space. Potential indirect effects associated with development include water quality impacts from associated with drainage into adjacent open space/downstream aquatic resources; lighting effects; noise effects; invasive plant species from landscaping; and effects from human access into adjacent open space, such as recreational activities (including off-road vehicles and hiking), pets, dumping, etc. Temporary, indirect effects may also occur as a result of construction-related activities.

The Project site is bordered by existing development to the north, west, south, and northeast. The adjacent portion of the Pumpkin Patch does not contain native habitat and has low habitat value for native wildlife; therefore, there is no potential for temporary or permanent indirect effects to native open space. The City of Long Beach Property Site (Marketplace Marsh) is 194 feet northeast of the Project site, and the Los Cerritos Wetlands complex is located to the northeast beyond the Marketplace Marsh; both wetland areas are separated from the Project site by existing development. Accordingly, there is no potential for temporary or permanent indirect impacts to adjacent native open space. Nevertheless, the Project will incorporate design features to prevent indirect impacts, including ensuring that stormwater flows and other runoff will not discharge into the Marketplace Marsh and Los Cerritos Wetlands, and installing exterior lighting that is directed down and away from the Marketplace Marsh and Los Cerritos Wetlands.

Additionally, the landscaping plant palette will not include any invasive species. Finally, the Marketplace Marsh and Los Cerritos Wetlands will remain fenced to prevent access.

Construction activities will comply with all applicable regulations and requirements for dust control, air quality, pollutants, and noise.
42 5.11 Cumulative Impacts to Biological Resources
Cumulative impacts are defined as the direct and indirect effects of a proposed project which, when considered alone, would not be deemed a substantial impact, but when considered in addition to the impacts of related projects in the area, would be considered potentially significant. “Related projects” refers to past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects, which would have similar impacts to the proposed project.

The Project site does not support any special-status biological resources and will not result in direct impacts to special-status biological resources. The Project will not result in any indirect impacts to special-status biological resources, including wetlands in the vicinity of the Project site, as it is separated from native open space by existing development. The Project site is located a minimum of 194 feet from the nearest wetland areas (Marketplace Marsh and Los Cerritos Wetlands) and over 400 feet from the San Gabriel River. With implementation of the SEASP mitigation monitoring and reporting measures identified in Section 6.2 below as applicable, no cumulative impacts will result from the Project.

6.0 AVOIDANCE AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The following discussion provides project-specific avoidance measures for actual or potential impacts to special-status resources, as well as mitigation for potential impacts to special-status biological resources for the SEASP plan area as set forth in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). The SEASP measures should be incorporated into the Project as applicable.

6.1 Nesting Birds
The mitigation measure set forth in SEASP Policy 5.30 shall be implemented to ensure that nesting birds are not harmed during project construction. It should be noted that raptor species and wading birds are not expected to nest within the Project site due to a general lack of suitable habitat.
• If an active nest of any species listed pursuant to the federal or California Endangered Species Act, California bird species of special concern, or a wading bird (herons or egrets) as well as owls or raptors is found, construction activities shall avoid breeding/nesting season (January through September). If construction is determined to be necessary during the breeding/nesting season, construction activities within 300 feet (500 feet from any owl or raptor nests) shall not exceed noise levels of 65 dB peak until the nest(s) is naturally vacated and juveniles have fledged and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The 65 dB peak noise levels may only be increased if a noise study demonstrates the ambient noise level is above 65 dB at the subject site, and shall not be allowed to exceed the ambient level. When construction is determined to be necessary during the breeding/nesting season, breeding/nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist at least 30 days prior to commencement of construction with a follow-up survey conducted 3 days prior to commencement of construction on sites where there is probable cause to believe that nesting birds may exist. 43 To ensure regulatory compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code, the following additional measure should be implemented:
• Vegetation clearing should be conducted outside of the nesting season (February 1 through September 15). If avoidance of the nesting season is not feasible, then a qualified biologist shall conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior any disturbance of the site, including vegetation clearing, demolition activities, and grading.

If active nests are identified, the biologist shall establish suitable buffers around the nests, and the buffer areas shall be avoided until the nests are no longer occupied and the juvenile birds can survive independently from the nests.

6.2 SEASP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The following mitigation measures are set forth by the SEASP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and should be incorporated into the Project as applicable. • BIO-1. Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a biological resources report conducted by a qualified biologist. The biological resources report shall include: analysis of available literature and databases (CNDDB); historical sensitive biological resources; review of current land use and land ownership within the project vicinity; on-site survey and mapping that delineates vegetation communities present within the development area; identification of jurisdictional waters and special status habitat, wildlife, and plant species. Focused surveys for sensitive, threatened, endangered species, will also be prepared, as required. The project applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed development and project design avoids impacts to special status species and habitats, in consultation with CDFW and USFWS. If complete avoidance is not possible, the project applicant shall obtain necessary permits from CDFW and USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall submit plans, required permits, and mitigation plans (if needed) to the Long Beach Development Services Department for review and approval.
• BIO-2. Concurrent with submittal of site development plans for development on or adjacent to undeveloped land and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a jurisdictional delineation prepared by a qualified biologist or letters stating that no such jurisdictional features exist. The jurisdictional delineation shall be prepared pursuant to the requirements of (1) US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, (2) CDFW jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, (3) RWQB jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and Section 13260 of the Porter-Cologne Act, and (4) wetlands as defined under the California Coastal Act. The project shall be designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional wetlands. If wetland avoidance is not possible, the applicant shall ensure no net loss of wetlands either by creation of applicant-sponsored 44 wetlands or purchase of mitigation bank credits in consultation with applicable Federaland State- agencies (Corps, CDFW, RWQB, and/or Coastal Commission). Any mitigation, replacement, and/or restoration of habitat shall occur in the LCWC or in an approved coastal mitigation bank that covers this area. If the applicant can demonstrate that there are no logistically viable opportunities for mitigation within the LCWC, the applicant may propose mitigation elsewhere, which must be approved by the City and the resource agencies. The mitigation plan prepared in consultation with the applicable agencies shall include: responsibilities and of persons to supervise and implement the plan, site selection, restoration and creation of habitat; site preparation and planting implementation, schedule, maintenance guidelines, monitoring plan (5 year minimum), and long-term preservation. Prior to the issuance of grading permits covering jurisdictional areas, the project applicant shall provide evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that (1) all necessary permits or authorizations have been obtained from the Corps (pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act), CDFW (pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, and RWQCB (pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act), the Coastal Commission, or that no such permits are required; and (2) the detailed mitigation and restoration plan shall be approved by the Development Services Department.
• BIO-3. If sensitive biological resources are identified within or abutting to the proposed development area, the project applicant shall submit evidence to the Long Beach Development Services Department that a qualified biologist has been retained to prepare a construction management plan. The construction limits shall be clearly flagged and/or fenced. No construction access, parking, storage of equipment, or waste dirt or rubble will be permitted within such marked areas. A monitoring biologist shall be onsite during any grading activities. The qualified biologist shall also develop and implement a project specific contractor training program to educate project contractors on the sensitive biological resources within and adjacent to the proposed development project area and oversee measures to avoid and/or minimize impacts to these species. • BIO-4. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any development, the project applicant shall include noise reduction measures to reduce noise impacts to wildlife. A note shall be provided on development plans indicating that throughout grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise:
• During all excavation and grading on-site, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers’ standards. • The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors (wildlife) nearest the project site.
• The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noisesensitive receptors (wildlife) during all project construction. 45 • No construction shall occur within 500 feet of nesting raptors or threatened or endangered species and 100 feet of all other nesting birds protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
• BIO-5. Prior to approval of any development adjacent to jurisdictional waters or habitat for special status species and all land within the Coastal Habitat, Wetlands & Recreation land use, the project applicant shall submit a photometric plan demonstrating that the project will be designed and shielded so that the project’s contribution of nighttime lighting shall be no greater than 0.10 foot-candles at the edge of the habitat. This would ensure that spill light does not result in exposure of artificial light at levels exceeding the intensity of moonlight (approximately 0.5 foot-candles). • BIO-6. Prior to approval of a trails/access plan within or adjacent to jurisdictional waters, the location, design, and text for urban-open space interface signage shall be developed.

The signage shall be located at all pedestrian access points. The signage shall educate users on the responsibilities associated with the open space interface and shall address relevant issues including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants.
• BIO-7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project applicant and/or subsequent builder shall prepare an urban-open space interface brochure to be approved by the Long Beach Development Services Department to educate residents on the responsibilities associated with living near sensitive biological habitat. The brochure shall address relevant issues, including the role of natural predators in the wildlands and how to minimize impacts of human and domestic pets on native communities and their inhabitants, including the “Light’s Out for Birds” programs. The approved brochure, along with attachments, shall be included as part of the rental/lease agreements and as part of the sales literature for future developments.
• BIO-8. If construction is proposed between January 15 to September 1st, a qualified biologist must conduct a nesting bird survey(s) no more than three days prior to initiation of construction activities to document the presence or absence of nesting birds in or adjacent to the project site. The preconstruction survey(s) will focus on identifying any raptors and/or passerines nests that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction activities. Any nest permanently vacated for the season would not warrant protection pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. If active nests are documented, the following measures are required:
• Species-specific measures shall be prepared by a qualified biologist and implemented to prevent abandonment of the active nest. At a minimum, grading in the vicinity of a nest shall be postponed until the young birds have fledged. A minimum exclusion buffer of 100 feet shall be maintained during construction, depending on the species and location. The perimeter of the nest setback zone shall be fenced or adequately demarcated with stakes and flagging at 20-foot intervals, and construction personnel and activities are restricted from the area. 46 • A survey report by a qualified biologist verifying that no active nests are present, or that the young have fledged, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to initiation of grading in the nestsetback zone. The qualified biologist shall serve as a biological monitor during those periods when construction activities occur near active nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur.
• A final report of the findings, prepared by a qualified biologist, shall be submitted to the Long Beach Development Services Department prior to constructionrelated activities that have the potential to disturb any active nests during the nesting season.
47 7.0 REFERENCES
Baldwin, B.G., D.H. Goldman, D.J. Keil, R. Patterson, T.J. Rosatti, and D.H. Wilken. 2012.

The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition. University of California Press. 1,568 pp.

California Department of Fish and Game. 2012. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation.

State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife. March 7, 2012.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2016. Complete List of Amphibian, Reptile, Bird and Mammal Species in California. California Wildlife Habitat Relationships Program, Sacramento.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2022. California Natural Community List.

California Natural Resources Agency, July 5, 2022.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities.

State of California, Natural Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Wildlife. March 20, 2018.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2023. Special Animals List. State of California Natural Resources Agency, January 2023.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2023. State and Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Animals of California. State of California Natural Resources Agency.

Sacramento, California. January 2023.

California Native Plant Society. 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (sixth edition). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. x + 388pp.

California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program. 2023. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (online edition, v 9.5). http://www.rareplants.cnps.org.

California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2023. RareFind 5. Records of occurrence for USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps: Los Alamitos, Seal Beach, Long Beach. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, State of California Natural Resources Agency.

Sacramento, California. Accessed March 13, 2023.
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data.

Chesser, R.T. et al. 2022. Check-list of North American Birds (online). American Ornithological Society. http://checklist.americanornithology.org/taxa. 48 Collins, Joseph T. and Travis W. Taggert. 2009. Standard Common and Current Scientific Names for North American Amphibians, Turtles, Reptiles, and Crocodilians, Sixth Edition. Publication of The Center for North American Herpetology, Lawrence, Kansas. iv+44p.

Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California: Status and Distribution. Los Angeles Audubon Society. 407 pp.

Holland, R. F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Nongame-Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Munz, P.A. 1974. A Flora of Southern California. University of California Press. 1,086 pp.

Nelson, J. 1984. Rare plant survey guidelines. In: Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. J. Smith and R. York (eds.). Special Publication No. 1. California Native Plant Society.

National Resources Conservation Service. 2023. Soil Survey Staff, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Accessed March 21, 2023.
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/.

Sawyer, J.O, T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A Manual of California Vegetation.

Second Edition. California Native Plant Society Press. Sacramento, California. 1,300 pp.

Stebbins, R. C. 1954. Amphibians and Reptiles of Western North America. McGraw-Hill, New York. 536pp.

Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories for Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants. Sacramento, CA: U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service. Unpublished memorandum; January 2000.

8.0 CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present data and information required for this biological evaluation, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signed:______________________________ Date: June 28, 2023 p:0840-55c.biotech.docx
Source: ESRI World Street Map
0 2
4 8
Miles
Regional Map
^_
Exhibit 1
±

MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT
6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

PROJECT LOCATION
Adapted from USGS Los Alamitos, CA quadrangle
Vicinity Map
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet ±

MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT
6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Exhibit 2
^_

PROJECT LOCATION
X:\0363-THE REST\0840-55EPCH\GIS\0840-55_Aerial.mxd
0 40 80 160
Feet ±

MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT
6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Aerial Map
Exhibit 3
Coordinate System: State Plane 5 NAD 83
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: NAD 1983 2011
Map Prepared by: B. Gale, GLA
Date Prepared: April 5, 2023
1 inch = 80 feet
Pacific Coast Highway
North Studebaker Road
Approximate
Project Site
100' Buffer into
Undeveloped Areas
X:\0363-THE RES T\0840-55EPCH\GIS \Veg eta tionGIS \0840-55_Veg eta tion.m xd 0 40 80 160 Feet ±

MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT
6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Veg eta tion Ma p
Exh ibit 4
Coordina te S ystem : S ta te Pla ne 5 NAD 83
Projection: La m bert Conform a l Conic
Da tum : NAD 1983 2011
Ma p Prepa red by: B. Ga le, GLA
Da te Prepa red: April 10, 2023
1 inch = 80 feet
Project S ite
100' Buffer into
Undev eloped Area s
Av ena spp. –
Brom us spp.
sem ina tura l a llia nce/
Mesem brya nth em um spp. –
Ca rpobrotus spp.
sem i-na tura l a llia nce
Euca lyptus
Orna m enta l
Disturbed
Dev eloped
Pacific Coast Highway
North Studebaker Road
Photograph 1: Southeast facing view of Project site. Most of the Project site is developed and supports no native vegetation or habitat for special-status biological resources.

Photograph 3: Southwest facing view of the ornamental planter in the western portion of the Project Site. Vegetation is generally limited to ornamental vegetation and nonnative grasses and forbs. Some limited ponding is present due to recent heavy rainstorms, but this area does not constitute a wetland.

Exhibit 5
MARKETPLACE MIXED USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Site Photographs
Photograph 2: West facing view of the Project site. No native habitat or special-status biological resources are present.

Photograph 4: Southeast facing view of the southern portion of the Project Site at the edge of the Pumpkin Patch property. This area supports no native vegetation communities or habitat for special-status biological resources.

X:\0363-THE REST\0840-55EPCH\GIS\WetlandsGIS\0840-55_PotentialSEASPWetlands.mxd 0 50 100 200 Feet ±

MARKETPLACE MIXED-USE PROJECT AT
6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
Potential SEASP Wetlands
Exhibit 6
Coordinate System: State Plane 5 NAD 83
Projection: Lambert Conformal Conic
Datum: NAD 1983 2011
Map Prepared by: B. Gale, GLA
Date Prepared: April 11, 2023
1 inch = 100 feet
Pacific Coast Highway
North Studebaker Road
Project Site
100' Buffer into
Undeveloped Areas
Potential CCC Wetlands *
* Source: Glenn Lukos Associates.

June 22, 2017. Jurisdictional Delineation
for the Los Cerritos Wetlands Oil Consolidation
and Restoration Project.

APPENDIX A

FLORAL COMPENDIUM
The floral compendium lists species identified within the Study Area. Taxonomy follows Jepson (Baldwin et al. 2012) and, for sensitive species, the California Native Plant Society's Rare Plant Online Inventory (CNPS 2022). Common names are taken from Baldwin et al. (2012), Munz (1974), and Roberts (1998). An asterisk (*) denotes a non-native species.

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME
Bassia hyssopifolia Fivehook bassia*
Bromus diandrus Ripgut brome*
Bromus rubens Red brome*
Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass*
Eucalyptus globulus Blue gum*
Festuca microstachys Small fescue
Ficus rubiginosa Rusty fig*
Hedera helix English ivy*
Hordeum murinum leporinum Hare barley*
Malva parviflora Cheeseweed*
Malva sylvestris High mallow*
Medicago polymorpha Bur clover*
Melilotus indicus Yellow sweetclover*
Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum Small flowered iceplant*
Phalaris paradoxa Hood canarygrass*
Phoenix canariensis Canary Island date palm*
Pittosporum sp. Pittosporum*
Platanus x hispanica Plane tree*
Poa annua Annual bluegrass*
Rhaphiolepis indica Indian hawthorne*
Salsola tragus Russian thistle*
Sonchus asper Spiny sowthistle*
Spergularia marina Salt sand spurry
Taraxacum officianale Dandelion*
Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm*

APPENDIX B

FAUNAL COMPENDIUM
The faunal compendium lists species that were either observed within or adjacent to the Study Area. Taxonomy and common names are taken from AOS (2022) for birds; Collins and Taggart (2009) and CDFW (2016) for reptiles and amphibians; and CDFG (2016) for mammals.

SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME

VERTEBRATES
Birds
Ardea alba Great egret
Ardea herodias Great blue heron
Calypte anna Anna’s hummingbird
Cathartes aura Turkey vulture
Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow
Haemorhous mexicanus House finch
Melospiza melodia Song sparrow
Mimus polyglottos Northern mockingbird
Passer domesticus House sparrow
Sayornis nigricans Black phoebe
Spinus psaltria Lesser goldfinch
Sturnus vulgaris European starling
Tyrannus vociferans Cassin’s kingbird
Zenaida macroura Mourning dove
Zonotrichia leucophrys White-crowned sparrow
Mammals
Canis latrans coyote
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
July 2023
Appendix D Historic Evaluation
MARKETPLACE MIXED - USE PROJECT AT 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY

CITY OF LONG BEACH
Appendix
PlaceWorks
This page intentionally left blank.
1518 West Taft Avenue
Orange, CA 92865
Office (714) 974-8300
Field Offices
San Diego • Riverside • Morro Bay • Sacramento

cogstone.com
Toll free 888-333-3212
Federal Certifications WOSB, EDWOSB, SDB
State Certifications DBE, WBE, UDBE

HISTORIC BUILT ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION FOR

THE LONG BEACH MARKET PLACE MIXED-USE

PROJECT, CITY OF LONG BEACH, LOS ANGELES

COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:

Mariana Zimmermann, PlaceWorks
Author:

Shannon Lopez, M.A.

Principal Investigator:

Shannon Lopez, M.A
Date
June 2023
Cogstone Project Number: 5639
Type of Study: Historic Built Environment Evaluation
USGS Quadrangle: USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle Los Alamitos
Area: Long Beach, CA
Key Words: City of Long Beach, Long Beach Marketplace, Long Beach Marketplace Office Park, El Torito
Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................IV INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................1 PURPOSE OF STUDY...........................................................................................................................................1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................2 PROJECT PERSONNEL ......................................................................................................................................6 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT...........................................................................................................................7 STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS.................................................................................................................7 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT...........................................................................................................7 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES ..............................................................................................................................7 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.....................................................................................................................................8 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES................................................................................................8 NATIVE AMERICAN HUMAN REMAINS ......................................................................................................................9 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TITLE 14, SECTION 4307 ...............................................................................9 CITY OF LONG BEACH LOCAL REGULATIONS.........................................................................................9 SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (SEASP) MITIGATION MEASURE.............................................10 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................10 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................15 HISTORIC SETTING..........................................................................................................................................15 CITY OF LONG BEACH HISTORY............................................................................................................................15 PROJECT AREA HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................16 LONG BEACH MARKET PLACE OFFICE PARK AND THE BIXBY RANCH COMPANY.....................................................17 EL TORITO...........................................................................................................................................................19 SOURCES CONSULTED.........................................................................................................................................21 HISTORIC SOCIETY CONSULTATION.......................................................................................................................21 SURVEY.....................................................................................................................................................................23 RESULTS ..............................................................................................................................................................23 EL TORITO...........................................................................................................................................................24 LONG BEACH MARKETPLACE OFFICE PARK..........................................................................................................26 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY .......................................................................................................................26 6621 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY .......................................................................................................................28 NATIONAL, CALIFORNIA, AND LOCAL EVALUATION ..............................................................................31

CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF LOCAL LANDMARKS AND LOCAL LANDMARK DISTRICTS ................................................................................................................................................................................31 6615 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY..............................................................................................................32 6621 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY..............................................................................................................33 EL TORITO (6605 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY) ....................................................................................34 RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................................................................37 REFERENCES CITED.............................................................................................................................................38 APPENDIX A. QUALIFICATIONS.......................................................................................................................41 APPENDIX B. HISTORICAL SOCIETY CONSULTATION .............................................................................51 APPENDIX C. CITY OF LONG BEACH: CHAPTER 2.63 CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION .......59 APPENDIX D. DPRS ...............................................................................................................................................69 Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone iii

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1. PROJECT VICINITY MAP ..............................................................................................................................1 FIGURE 2. PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................4 FIGURE 3. PROJECT AREA MAP ....................................................................................................................................5 FIGURE 4. 1980 USDA AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH (FRAME FINDER 1980).....................................................................17 FIGURE 5. 1978 SITE PLAN FOR THE “MARKETPLACE OFFICE PARK” (CHARLES KOBER ASSOCIATES 1978). .....19 FIGURE 6. FOUNDER OF THE EL TORITO CHAIN, LARRY J. CANO (PHOTO BY JOHN GILHOOLY; WOO 2014).......20 FIGURE 7. SOUTHWEST FAÇADE, FACING NORTHEAST..............................................................................................25 FIGURE 8. OVERVIEW OF SOUTHEAST ELEVATION, FACING NORTHWEST................................................................26 FIGURE 9. OVERVIEW OF SOUTHWEST FAÇADE (FACING WEST)...............................................................................28 FIGURE 10. OBLIQUE VIEW OF NORTHEAST ELEVATION (LEFT) AND NORTHWEST ELEVATION (RIGHT), FACING SOUTH..........................................................................................................................................................................28 FIGURE 11. OVERVIEW OF 6621 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, FACING NORTHEAST.............................................29 FIGURE 12. SOUTHEAST ELEVATION, FACING NORTHWEST......................................................................................30

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1. ADDITIONAL SOURCES CONSULTED...........................................................................................................21 Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone iv

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The purpose of this study is to conduct a historic built environment evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project (Project). The Project site encompasses private property and public right-of-way (approximately 253,636 square feet or approximately 5.8 acres) and is comprised of two full parcels with Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 7237-020-040 and -050, a portion of parcel APN 7237-020-041, the sidewalk and bike lane along Pacific Coast Highway, and Studebaker Road right-of-way. The Project area of the mixed-use site is 3.7 acres in size.

The Project is bordered by surface parking and commercial uses to the north, an existing twostory office building and the Los Cerritos Wetlands to the northeast, a vacant lot (“Pumpkin Patch site”) to the south, and the Pacific Coast Highway to the west. The Project is located at 6615-6695 East Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California.

The Project will involve the demolition of two existing office buildings (6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway and 6695 E. Pacific Coast Highway) and associated parking and landscape areas and construct a six-story mixed-use development comprised of 390 apartment units with 5,351 square feet (sf) of ground floor retail totaling a building area of 645,045 sf including the parking area. The Project area is currently developed as the Long Beach Marketplace Office Park, which contains two extant buildings that were constructed in 1979 (6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway) and 1983 (6695 E. Pacific Coast Highway) and are not yet 45 years of age or older. The office building at 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway is also part of the Long Beach Marketplace Office Park (but not within the boundaries of the Project area) and was built in 1980 (43 years old).

This study was completed in compliance with the Southeast Area Specific Plan (SEASP) Mitigation Measure CUL-1 which states that “Future development or redevelopment projects on or near buildings or structures 45 years of age or older shall require an intensive-level historical evaluation.” In total, three buildings were evaluated as part of this study. This includes two office buildings within the Long Beach Marketplace Office Park; 6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway (built 1979) located within the Project area and 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway (built 1980) located adjacent to the Project area. The third building evaluated for this study is a vacant El Torito restaurant (built 1977/1978) located adjacent to the Project area at 6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway.

The buildings adjacent to the Project area (the El Torito restaurant at 6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway and the office building at 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway) were documented and evaluated for potential historic significant in compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and to determine if the Project would have a negative impact on the historic setting if either of these buildings were determined historically significant. While 6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway meets the minimum threshold of being 45 years old, 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway (43 years old) does not quite meet this threshold. Out of an abundance of caution and to maintain compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1, 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway was included in this study in the event that this is nearing 45 years of age and may reach that age threshold before this Project is complete. By that standard, the office building within the Project area at 6695 E. Pacific Coast Highway was not included in this study as it does not meet the minimum 45-year threshold (built Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone v
in 1983; 40 years old). It is not anticipated that this building will reach the minimum threshold before this Project is complete.

On March 2, 2023, Cogstone’s architectural historian Shannon Lopez visited the Project area.

Ms. Lopez photographed and documented the exterior of 6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway (office building) located within the Project area. Ms. Lopez then photographed and documented the 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway (office building) and vacant El Torito restaurant (6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway) which are adjacent to the Project area. As the two office buildings are part of the same office park, both buildings were recorded on the same set of Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms. The El Torito was newly recorded on one set of DPR 523 forms.

The two office buildings within the Long Beach Marketplace Office Park; 6615 E. Pacific Coast Highway (built 1979) located within the Project area and 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway (built 1980) located adjacent to the Project area are recommended not eligible for listing at the local, state, or national level due to a lack of significance. The vacant El Torito restaurant (6605 E.

Pacific Coast Highway) located adjacent to the Project area is also recommended not eligible for listing at the local, state, or national level due to lack of significance.

This analysis satisfies the requirements set forth by Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and therefore implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 is not necessary. No further work is recommended.

Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 1

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE OF STUDY
The purpose of this study is to conduct a historic built environment evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project, City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California (Project; Figure 1). The City of Long Beach is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Figure 1. Project vicinity map
Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 2

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The Project site encompasses private property and public right-of-way (approximately 253,636 square feet or approximately 5.8 acres) and is comprised of two full parcels with Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 7237-020-040 and -050, a portion of parcel APN 7237-020-041, the sidewalk and bike lane along Pacific Coast Highway, and Studebaker Road right-of-way. The Project area of the mixed-use site is 3.7 acres in size. The Project is bordered by surface parking and commercial uses to the north, an existing two-story office building and the Los Cerritos Wetlands to the northeast, a vacant lot (“Pumpkin Patch site”) to the south, and the Pacific Coast Highway to the west. The Project is located at 6615-6695 East Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Long Beach, Los Angeles County, California (Figures 2 and 3).

The buildings adjacent to the Project area (the El Torito restaurant at 6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway and the office building at 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway) were documented and evaluated for potential historic significant in compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and to determine if the Project would have a negative impact on the historic setting if either of these buildings were determined historically significant. While 6605 E. Pacific Coast Highway meets the minimum threshold of being 45 years old, 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway (43 years old) does not quite meet this threshold. Out of an abundance of caution and to maintain compliance with Mitigation Measure CUL-1, 6621 E. Pacific Coast Highway was included in this study in the event that this is nearing 45 years of age an may reach that age threshold before this Project is Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 3
complete. By that standard, the office building within the Project area at 6695 E. Pacific Coast Highway was not included in this study as it does not meet the minimum 45 year threshold (built in 1983; 40 years old). It is not anticipated that this building will reach the minimum threshold before this Project is complete.

Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 4
Figure 2. Project location
Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 5
Figure 3. Project area map
Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 6

PROJECT PERSONNEL
Cogstone Resource Management (Cogstone) conducted the cultural and paleontological resources monitoring and authored this report. Resumes of key personnel are provided in Appendix A.
• Molly Valasik provided overall QA/QC. Ms. Valasik has an M.A. in Anthropology from Kent State University in Ohio and over 14 years of experience in southern California archaeology.
• Shannon Lopez served as the architectural historian and authored this report. Ms. Lopez holds an M.A. in History (with an emphasis in architectural history) from CSU Fullerton.

She has more than five years of experience in the field of history and architectural history.
• Logan Freeberg made the Geographic Information System (GIS) maps for this report.

Mr. Freeberg holds a B.A. in Anthropology from the UC Santa Barbara and a GIS certification from California State University (CSU) Fullerton. He has over 19 years of experience in California archaeology.

Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 7

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
CEQA states that: It is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects, and that the procedures required are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed project and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects.

CEQA declares that it is state policy to: "take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with...historic environmental qualities." It further states that public or private projects financed or approved by the state are subject to environmental review by the state. All such projects, unless entitled to an exemption, may proceed only after this requirement has been satisfied. CEQA requires detailed studies that analyze the environmental effects of a proposed project. In the event that a project is determined to have a potential significant environmental effect, the act requires that alternative plans and mitigation measures be considered.

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
As of 2015, CEQA established that “[a] project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment” (Pub. Resources Code, § 21084.2). In order to be considered a “tribal cultural resource,” a resource must be either:
(1) listed, or determined to be eligible for listing, on the national, state, or local register of historic resources, or
(2) a resource that the lead agency chooses, in its discretion, to treat as a tribal cultural resource.

To help determine whether a project may have such an effect, the lead agency must consult with any California Native American tribe that requests consultation and is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project. If a lead agency determines that a project may cause a substantial adverse change to tribal cultural resources, the lead agency must consider measures to mitigate that impact. Public Resources Code §20184.3 (b)(2) provides examples of mitigation measures that lead agencies may consider to avoid or minimize impacts to tribal cultural resources.

Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 8

PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE
Section 5097.5: No person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure or deface any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on public lands (lands under state, county, city, district or public authority jurisdiction, or the jurisdiction of a public corporation), except with the express permission of the public agency having jurisdiction over such lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. As used in this section, "public lands" means lands owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the state, or any city, county, district, authority, or public corporation, or any agency thereof.

CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
The California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) is a listing of all properties considered to be significant historical resources in the state. The California Register includes all properties listed or determined eligible for listing on the National Register, including properties evaluated under Section 106, and State Historical Landmarks No. 770 and above. The California Register statute specifically provides that historical resources listed, determined eligible for listing on the California Register by the State Historical Resources Commission, or resources that meet the California Register criteria are resources which must be given consideration under CEQA (see above). Other resources, such as resources listed on local registers of historic resources or in local surveys, may be listed if they are determined by the State Historic Resources Commission to be significant in accordance with criteria and procedures to be adopted by the Commission and are nominated; their listing in the California Register is not automatic.

Resources eligible for listing include buildings, sites, structures, objects, or historic districts that retain historical integrity and are historically significant at the local, state or national level under one or more of the following four criteria:
1) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; 3) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or 4) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

In addition to having significance, resources must have integrity for the period of significance.

The period of significance is the date or span of time within which significant events transpired, or significant individuals made their important contributions. Integrity is the authenticity of a Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 9
historical resource’s physical identity as evidenced by the survival of characteristics or historic fabric that existed during the resource’s period of significance.

Alterations to a resource or changes in its use over time may have historical, cultural, or architectural significance. Simply, resources must retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. A resource that has lost its historic character or appearance may still have sufficient integrity for the California Register, if, under Criterion 4, it maintains the potential to yield significant scientific or historical information or specific data.

NATIVE AMERICAN HUMAN REMAINS
Sites that may contain human remains important to Native Americans must be identified and treated in a sensitive manner, consistent with state law (i.e., Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and Public Resources Code §5097.98), as reviewed below:

In the event that human remains are encountered during project development and in accordance with the Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, the County Coroner must be notified if potentially human bone is discovered. The Coroner will then determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject to his or her authority. If the Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) by phone within 24 hours, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The NAHC will then designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) with respect to the human remains. The MLD then has the opportunity to recommend to the property owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods.

CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, TITLE 14, SECTION 4307
This section states that “No person shall remove, injure, deface or destroy any object of paleontological, archeological or historical interest or value.”

CITY OF LONG BEACH LOCAL REGULATIONS
Per the City of Long Beach Municipal Code (LBMC) Chapter 2.63 Cultural Heritage Commission, the recognition, preservation, protection and use of cultural resources are necessary to the health, property, social and cultural enrichment and general welfare of the people. The purpose of the City of Long Beach’s Cultural Heritage Commission is to recognize, protect and promote the retention, maintenance and use of Landmarks and Landmark Districts in the City in accordance with the LBMC. (Appendix C).

As defined in LBMC Chapter 2.63, 2.63.020 Definitions:

Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 10
• Landmark: means any property or improvement, manmade or natural that has special historical, cultural, archeological, architectural or aesthetic value as part of the heritage of the City, State, or United States and has been designated as a Landmark pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.
• Landmark District: means any grouping of related properties that has a special historical, cultural, archeological, architectural or aesthetic value as part of the heritage of the City, State or United States and has been designated as a Landmark District pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.

Criteria for designation of Landmarks and Landmark Districts.

Landmarks. A cultural resource qualifies for designation as a Landmark if it retains integrity and manifests one (1) or more of the following criteria:

A. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of the City's history; or
B. It is associated with the lives of persons significant in the City's past; or C. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or it represents the work of a master or it possesses high artistic values; or D. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Landmark Districts. A group of cultural resources qualify for designation as a Landmark District if it retains integrity as a whole and meets the following criteria:

A. The grouping represents a significant and distinguishable entity that is significant within a historic context.

B. A minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the properties within the boundaries of the proposed landmark district qualify as a contributing property. ( ORD-15-0038 § 1, 2015)

SOUTHEAST AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (SEASP) MITIGATION MEASURE The following mitigation measures were prepared in 2017 by Place Works for the City of Long Beach regarding this project as required by CEQA.

CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-1
Future development or redevelopment projects on or near buildings or structures 45 years of age or older shall require an intensive-level historical evaluation. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer shall prepare the evaluation in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local guidelines for evaluating historical resources. If, based on the evaluation of the property, it is determined that the proposed development or redevelopment project will have a substantial adverse effect on a historical resource (i.e., it would reduce its integrity to the point that it would no longer be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Built Environment Evaluation for the Long Beach Market Place Mixed-Use Project Cogstone 11
Historical Resources or in the list of Long Beach Landmarks), then the provisions of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 shall be implemented by the property owner or project applicant/developer to eliminate or reduce the project’s impact on historical resources.

CUL-2
If, based on the intensive-level historical evaluation required under Mitigation Measure CUL-1, it is determined that the proposed development or redevelopment project will have a substantial adverse effect on a historical resource, the City of Long Beach shall require the property owner or project applicant/developer to implement the following measures:

A. Rehabilitation According to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards

1. If the proposed project includes renovation, alteration, or an addition to a historical resource (not including total demolition), then the property owner or project applicant/developer shall first seek to design all proposed renovation, alterations, or additions to the historical resource in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation (Standards), found at: http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm. a. Plans for rehabilitation shall be created under the supervision of a professional meeting the Department of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in Architectural History or Historic Architecture and be designed by a licensed architect with demonstrated historic preservation experience.
b. Plans shall be reviewed in the schematic design phase prior to any construction work, as well as in the 60 and 90 percent construction documents phases, for compliance with the Standards by a historic preservation professional meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards with demonstrated experience with the Standards compliance reviews.
c. The qualified historic preservation professional reviewing the plans shall create a technical memo at each phase and submit the memo to the City of Long Beach Development Services Department for concurrence. d. At the discretion of the City, a detailed character-defining features analysis and/or historical resource treatment plan may need to be prepared for select historical resources by a historic preservation professional meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards if the nature of the project or the significance of the property warrants such detailed analysis.
e. A qualified historic preservation professional shall monitor construction activities at key milestones to ensure that the work to be conducted complies with the Standards. The milestones shall be agreed upon in advance by the City and property owner or project applicant/developer.

Long Beach City CouncilSeptember 19, 2023

Long Beach City Council
September 19, 2023