Agenda — Los Alamitos City Council, March 21, 2022

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Council Chamber
3191 Katella Ave., Los Alamitos, CA 90720

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING
Monday, March 21, 2022 – 6:00 p.m.

SAFETY ALERT – NOTICE REGARDING COVID-19
If you wish to attend the City Council meeting in person, the Council Chamber located at 3191 Katella Ave., Los Alamitos, California 90720, will have seating for this meeting and the public shall have the right to observe and offer public comment at this location. The City of Los Alamitos continues to follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and these provisions are subject change with short notice.

While you may attend this meeting in person, given the health risks associated with COVID-19, please be advised that you may submit comments on any agenda item or on any item not on the agenda by email to [email protected] with the subject line “PUBLIC COMMENT”. Comments received by 3:00 p.m. will be compiled, provided to the City Council, and made available to the public before the start of the meeting.

Staff will not read email comments at the meeting but the official record will include all email comments received until the close of the meeting. You may also view the meeting live on local cable channel 3.

Please consider carefully before attending this meeting in person and do not attend this meeting in person if you have had direct contact with someone who has tested positive for Coronavirus (COVID-19), or you are experiencing symptoms such as coughing, sneezing, fever, difficulty breathing or other flu-like symptoms.

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC – This Agenda contains a brief general description of each item to be considered.

Except as provided by law, action or discussion shall not be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda.

Supporting documents, including staff reports, are available for review at City Hall in the City Clerk’s Office or on the City’s website at www.cityoflosalamitos.org once the agenda has been publicly posted.

Each matter on the agenda, no matter how described, shall be deemed to include any appropriate motion, whether to adopt a minute motion, resolution, payment of any bill, approval of any matter or action, or any other action. Items listed as “for information” or “for discussion” may also be the subject of an “action” taken by the City Council at the same meeting.

Any written materials relating to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection online at www.cityoflosalamitos.org.

Persons wishing to address the City Council on any item on the City Council Agenda should complete a blue “Request to Speak” card and will be called upon at the time the agenda item is called or during the City Council's consideration of the item and may address the City Council for up to three minutes.

It is the intention of the City of Los Alamitos to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee, or a participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (562) 431-3538, extension 220, 48 hours prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements
City Council Regular Agenda
March 21, 2022

Page 2 ends

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink
Mayor Pro Tem Doby
Council Member Bates
Council Member Chirco
Council Member Nefulda

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council Member Bates will lead the Pledge of Allegiance.

4. INVOCATION
Council Member Nefulda will give the Invocation.

5. PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentations to Eric R Nuñez for his Service to the City of Los Alamitos as Police Chief
B. Presentation to West-Comm Representatives in Recognition of Telecommunications Week
C. Update Regarding the Orange County Veteran’s Cemetery

6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
At this time, any individual in the audience may come forward to speak on any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Remarks are to be limited to not more than five minutes per speaker.

7. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
At this time, Council Members may also report on items not specifically described on the Agenda that are of interest to the community, provided no action or discussion is taken except to provide Staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future Agenda.

8. ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER

9. WARRANTS
Ratify the Warrants for the period from February 8, 2022 through March 7, 2022 in the amount of $1,017,174.71.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink
Mayor Pro Tem Doby
Council Member Bates
Council Member Chirco
Council Member Nefulda
City Council Regular Agenda
March 21, 2022

Page 3 ends

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
All Consent Calendar items may be acted upon by one motion unless a Council Member requests separate action on a specific item.

A. Approval of Minutes (City Clerk)
Approve the City Council Special and Regular Minutes of February 28, 2022 and Special Minutes of March 7, 2022.

B. Findings Required by AB 361 for the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for Meetings (City Attorney)
For the City Council to continue to have the option to meet via teleconference during the pandemic, AB 361 requires the City Council make specific findings at least every thirty (30) days.

Recommendation: Make the following findings by a majority vote of the City Council:

1. A state of emergency has been proclaimed by California’s Governor due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and continues to be in effect; and,

2. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and,

3. State and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19.

C. Amendment to the Resolution Establishing Salaries and Benefits for Non-Represented Employees to Include Management Analyst (Administration)
This report outlines the personnel change for the Administration Department, City Manager’s Office.

Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-09, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR MANAGEMENT
ANALYST”; and,

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-10, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING THE SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR NONREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE MANAGEMENT ANALYST”; and,

3. Approve a budget amendment for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in the Administration Department for an additional $32,260 for a full-time City Council Regular Agenda
March 21, 2022

Page 4 ends

Management Analyst position.

D. Notice of Completion for Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21-04) (Development Services)
The work for the Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21- 04) has been completed. The work included repair of the damaged Cerritos Avenue Bridge guardrail.

Recommendation:

1. Accept as complete the construction by Peterson-Chase General Engineering Construction, Inc. for the Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21-04); and,

2. Direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion/Final Report with the County Recorder’s Office; and,

3. Authorize Staff to release the 5% retention to the contractor, in the amount of $2,213.00 thirty-five (35) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion.

The Public Hearing will begin promptly at 7:00 p.m.

11. PUBLIC HEARING – 7:00 p.m.

A. Public Hearing #4 (Continued) to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries and Select a Preferred District Boundary Map (City Clerk)
Pursuant to Elections Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps following each decennial federal census to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The deadline for cities to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022. This Public Hearing was continued from March 7, 2022.

Recommendation:

1. Reopen the public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Select a preferred District Boundary Map; and,

3. Introduce, waive reading in full and authorize reading by title only of Ordinance No. 2022-01, and set for adoption; and,
City Council Regular Agenda
March 21, 2022

Page 5 ends

4. City Attorney Daudt read the title of Ordinance No. 2022-01, entitled, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS

ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT MAPS FOR THE
CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS .”

12. DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review and Financial Update for Fiscal Year 2021-22 (Finance)
This report provides a review of Mid-Year General Fund budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 and a projection for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

Recommendation:

1. Review the Mid-year General Fund budget for the Fiscal Year 2021- 22, and projection for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2022; and,

2. Provide direction and comments.

13. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Existing Litigation (54956.9) Los Alamitos Unified School District v. City of Los Alamitos; Claim No.

GHC0035328 (4100.009)
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
City Negotiator: Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney
Employee/Organization: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Authority: Government Code Section 54957.6
C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
Authority: Government Code Section 54957

14. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will adjourn to Monday, April 11, 2022, at 5:30 p.m.

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing Agenda was posted at the Los Alamitos City Hall, 3191 Katella Ave. and online at www.cityoflosalamitos.org not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Dated: March 17, 2022

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
SPECIAL MEETING – February 28, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council met in Special Session at 5:37 p.m., Monday, February 28, 2022, in the Council Chamber located at 3191 Katella Ave., Los Alamitos, CA 90720, Mayor Hasselbrink presiding. As a result of the State of Emergency in California due to the threat of COVID-19 and pursuant to Governor Newsom Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020, Council Member Chirco participated via teleconference.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Council Members: Bates, Chirco, Nefulda,
Mayor Pro Tem Doby, Mayor Hasselbrink

Absent: Council Members: None

Present: Staff: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Michael Daudt, City Attorney
Craig Koehler, Finance Director
Emeline Noda, Recreation and Community Services Director Ron Noda, Development Services Director
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Chelsi Wilson, Administrative Services Manager

3. SPECIAL ORDER OF THE DAY
A. Interview and Appointments for City Commissions (City Clerk) This report provides relevant information by which the City Council may interview and appoint members to City Commissions.

Mayor Hasselbrink advised Applicant John Riley had withdrawn his application for consideration and Planning Commission incumbent applicants would be considered without an interview.

The City Council interviewed applicant Davis Zellmer via teleconference.

Motion/Second: Bates/Chirco
Unanimously Carried: The City Council: Appointed Davis Zellmer to the Planning Commission with a term expiring December 2024.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Item No. 10A
City Council Adjourned Regular Agenda
February 28, 2022

Page 2 ends

Council Member Nefulda Aye

4. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council adjourned at 5:47 p.m.

Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
Attest:

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING – February 28, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council met in Adjourned Regular Session at 5:37 p.m., Monday, February 28, 2022, in the Council Chamber located at 3191 Katella Ave., Los Alamitos, CA 90720, Mayor Hasselbrink presiding. As a result of the State of Emergency in California due to the threat of COVID-19 and pursuant to Governor Newsom Executive Order N-25-20 issued on March 12, 2020, Council Member Chirco participated via teleconference.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Council Members: Bates, Chirco, Nefulda,
Mayor Pro Tem Doby, Mayor Hasselbrink

Absent: Council Members: None

Present: Staff: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Michael Claborn, Police Chief
Michael Daudt, City Attorney
Craig Koehler, Finance Director
Emeline Noda, Recreation and Community Services Director Ron Noda, Development Services Director
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Chelsi Wilson, Administrative Service Manager

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Hasselbrink led the Pledge of Allegiance.

INVOCATION
Council Member Doby gave the Invocation.

4. PRESENTATION
A. Presentation Regarding the Upcoming 47th Annual Americana Awards (Saturday, March 26, 2022) by Mr. Howard Kummerman, Executive Director, Cypress College Foundation
Mayor Hasselbrink and the Council received the presentation.

5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
At this time, any individual in the audience may come forward to speak on any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Remarks are to be limited to not more than five minutes per speaker.

Mayor Hasselbrink opened Oral Communications.

City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 2 ends

City Clerk Quintanar advised no one was participating via teleconference and no requests to speak had been received.

Mayor Hasselbrink closed Oral Communications.

6. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS
At this time, Council Members may also report on items not specifically described on the Agenda that are of interest to the community, provided no action or discussion is taken except to provide Staff direction to report back or to place the item on a future Agenda.

Council Member Chirco spoke regarding attendance at the Budget Standing Committee; Special Council Meeting; and, advised he had been traveling for vacation and work.

Council Member Bates spoke regarding attendance at the Library Advisory Board and Finance Committee for the League of California Cities and advised of the ongoing Orange County Sanitation District Trunk Sewer Project.

Council Member Nefulda had nothing to report.

Mayor Pro Tem Doby spoke regarding attendance at the Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control District virtual board meeting and the Human Relations Committee meeting. She commended the Development Services Team and Code Enforcement for their dedicated work and recommended the hamburger from Paul’s Place.

Mayor Hasselbrink spoke regarding attendance at the Los Alamitos Education Foundation Gala, Los Alamitos Youth Baseball Opening Day, and the Orange County Fire Authority Board meeting. She advised of the upcoming events Good Morning Los Alamitos and Weekend of Art.

7. ITEMS FROM THE CITY MANAGER
City Manager Simmons stated the Chief of Police, Michael Claborn, would be speaking at the next Chamber of Commerce Breakfast.

8. WARRANTS
Council Member Bates received clarification on the following items:
• Page 6, Silver Senior Fitness Class – possibility of partnering with health insurance companies to have the classes covered for participants • Page 5, OpenGov – Financial software available to the public for financial transparency
• Page 9, Long Beach Animal Control Services – requested more detailed City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 3 ends

descriptions for charges
Motion/Second: Bates/Doby
Unanimously Carried: The City Council ratified the Warrants for the period from January 4, 2022 through February 7, 2022 in the amount of $1,264,244.93.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye
The Public Hearing started promptly at 6:30 p.m.

9. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Public Hearing #3 to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries (City Clerk)
Pursuant to Election Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The deadline for cities to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

City Clerk Quintanar introduced the item. Dr. Justin Levitt, National Demographics Company (NDC), gave a PowerPoint presentation and provided an explanation for each of the maps.

Mayor Hasselbrink opened the Public Hearing for comments.

Frank Marchese, resident, stated appreciation for the City, Council, and the Police Department. He thanked Council for their dedicated work.

Maggie Marchese, resident, received clarification from Public Map 1 and NDC Map 1. She stated it would be challenging to split up Apartment Row.

Shane Smith stated he had submitted Public Map 1. He expressed frustration in not having access to the socioeconomic data available to the City’s demographer. He stated there was a vast economic inequality throughout the City between renters and homeowners. He stated support for preserving the interest of Apartment Row as much as possible to ensure it has a voice. He stated he was happy to participate in the process and City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 4 ends

believed now was the time to make significant adjustments to the district boundaries.

Dave Boyer, Chamber Representative, welcomed the Police Chief Claborn and advised he would be speaking at the next Chamber Breakfast. He stated appreciation for the Council’s efforts and wished them well in the redistricting process.

City Clerk Quintanar advised no one was participating via teleconference and no requests to speak had been received.

Mayor Hasselbrink closed the Public Hearing for comments.

Council and Staff discussed the following:
• Map 3 kept the districts fairly contiguous
• Consideration of including Lily and Marna in District 1 • Importance of keeping the sizeable Asian community in the north end of District 2 together
• Industrial areas are included within census blocks even if they contain zero populations
• Importance of keeping complete census blocks within the same district
• Incoming developments were taken into consideration
• Preference for ensuring as many voters as possible remain in districts with the same election sequence
• Preference for keeping across the street neighbors in the same district
• Population density of Apartment Row and the constraints it adds to the process
• Population deviations between districts is limited to 10% The City Council:

1. Opened the public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Reviewed draft maps to redraw district boundaries and provided input to Staff.

10. CONSENT CALENDAR
All Consent Calendar items may be acted upon by one motion unless a Council Member requests separate action on a specific item.

Mayor Pro Tem Doby pulled items 10H and 10J.

City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 5 ends

Council Member Bates pulled items 10C, 10D, and 10H.

Motion/Second: Chirco/Bates
Unanimously Carried: The City Council approved the following Consent Calendar Items:

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye
A. Approval of Minutes (City Clerk)
The City Council approved the City Council Special and Regular Minutes of January 18, 2022 and Special Minutes of February 7, 2022.

The City Council made the following findings by a majority vote:

1. A state of emergency has been proclaimed by California’s Governor due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and continues to be in effect; and,

2. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and,

3. State and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19.

E. Resolution No. 2022-05 – CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grants (Development Services)
This report seeks Council’s authorization to apply for CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant. The grant would assist the City’s effort in education and implementation of requirements associated with SB 1383.

The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-05, entitled, “A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS

ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF

APPLICATION FOR ALL CALRECYCLE GRANT AND PAYMENT
PROGRAMS FOR WHICH THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS IS ELIGIBLE”.

City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 6 ends

F. Support of Federal Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Legislation that Protects Ratepayers and Water/Wastewater Agencies (City Clerk)
Consideration of a Resolution supporting the Orange County Water District’s (OCWD’s) and Orange County Sanitation District’s (OCSD) legislative platform: CERCLA exemption for water and wastewater agencies that simply receive and treat for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS); continued use of cost-benefit analysis in the establishment of future drinking water standards and request to provide funding for PFAS remediation to water and wastewater agencies.

The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-08, entitled, “A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS

ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING FEDERAL PER- AND

POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS), LEGISLATION THAT

PROTECTS RATEPAYERS AND WATER AND WASTEWATER
AGENCIES”.

G. Citywide Street Striping and Pavement Marking (CIP 21/22-02) (Development Services)
The citywide striping program assists in maintaining safe and up-to-date striping, and pavement markings that comply with current Federal and State standards. The City has allocated $75,000 from Gas Tax and $25,000 from General fund (CIP 21/22-02), which includes the design and installation of striping and pavement markings. The Streets that will be updated in 2021- 2022 budget include streets in Old Town West neighborhood, Old Dutch Haven neighborhood, Briggeman Street, and Cerritos Avenue.

The City Council:

1. Approved the plans and specifications for the Traffic Striping and Pavement Markings in the Old Town West Neighborhood, Old Dutch Haven Neighborhood, Briggeman, Sausalito Street, and Cerritos Avenue (CIP No. 21/22-02) as recommend by the Traffic
Commission; and,

2. Authorized Staff to solicit bids to begin facilitating the proposed striping and pavement markings.

I. Award of Bid for the CDBG Howard Ave and Bloomfield Street Improvement FY 2021-2022 Project (CIP No. 21/22-04)
(Development Services)
On January 18, 2022, staff received and reviewed bids to the City’s Request for CIP No. 21/22-04 (FY 2021-2022) – the CDBG Howard Ave and Bloomfield Street Improvement Project.

City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 7 ends

The City Council:

1. Awarded construction for the CDBG Howard Ave and Bloomfield Street Improvement FY 2021-2022 Project (CIP No. 21/22-04) to Hardy and Harper, Inc. in the amount of $205,000; and,

2. Authorized the Mayor to execute the contract with Hardy and Harper, Inc. for the project; and,

3. Authorized the City Engineer to add work and execute change orders in the amount not to exceed the contingency reserve of 10% or $20,500.

End of Consent Calendar
Items Pulled from Consent Calendar
Motion/Second: Bates/Doby
Unanimously Carried: The City Council discussed and approved the following items pulled from the Consent Calendar.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye
C. Amendment to the Resolution Establishing Salaries and Benefits for Non-Represented Employees to Include Finance Manager (Finance) This report outlines the personnel changes for the Finance Department Budget.

Council and Staff discussed the importance of having checks and balance and internal control within the Finance Department as reported in the most recent audit. Finance would like to move operations to more efficient automated methods and assistance was needed. Clarification was provided on the full-time salary.

The City Council:

1. Adopted Resolution No. 2022-06, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA,

ADOPTING JOB DESCRIPTION FOR FINANCE MANAGER
City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 8 ends

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2022-07, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR

NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE FINANCE
MANAGER”; and,

3. Approved a budget amendment for Fiscal year 2021-2022 in the Finance Department for an additional $86,624 for a full-time Finance Manager position.

D. Award of Professional Services Agreement (PSA) with Joncowest LLC. for Janitorial Services for City Facilities (Development Services) On January 4, 2022, staff received and reviewed bids to the City’s Request for Proposals (RFP) 2021-11 for janitorial services for the Civic Center including the Community Center complex.

Staff provided clarification on the tasks that would be taken on by the contracted janitorial staff and the increased Staff time that would be available to dedicate to operations and projects.

The City Council:

1. Awarded the bid for RFP 2021-11; and,

2. Authorized the Mayor to execute the Professional Services Agreement with Joncowest, LLC for janitorial services in an amount not to exceed $5,262.00 per month for a term of one year with an option for up to two 1-year extensions.

H. Award of Bid for the Los Alamitos Street Improvement Project on Various Streets FY 2021-2022 (CIP No. 21/22-03)
(Development Services)
On December 15, 2021, staff received and reviewed bids for the Los Alamitos Street Improvement Project on Various Streets FY 2021-2022 (CIP No. 21/22-03).

Council and Staff discussed the projected timeline, the volume of the street project throughout the entire City, clarification funding would be from the General Fund, and a request to include Bennington as soon as possible.

The City Council:

1. Awarded the contract for the Los Alamitos Street Improvement Project on Various Streets FY 2021-2022 (CIP No. 21/22-03) to RJ Noble Company in the amount of $1,378,015.00; and,
City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 9 ends

2. Authorized the Mayor to execute the contract with RJ Noble Company for the project; and,

3. Authorized the City Engineer to add work and execute change orders in the amount not to exceed the contingency reserve of 10% or $137,802.00; and,

4. Appropriated $270,000 to the Los Alamitos Street Improvement Project account, line item 10.570.5501.1707.

J. Approval of Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Bid for Fabrication and Installation of Storm Water Protection Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) Units Project (CIP No. 21/22-05) (Development Services) This report seeks approval to facilitate the solicitation of bids to begin fabrication and installation of storm water protection Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) units in the City's 118 catch basins.

Council and Staff discussed on average supplies have universally seen a 20-25% increase and the process to go with the lowest responsible bidder who meets all qualifications in the bid documents and who has been vetted.

The City Council:

1. Approved the plans and specification for the fabrication and installation of catch basin Connector Pipe Screen (CPS) units project (CIP No. 21/22-05) Citywide; and,

2. Authorized Staff to advertise and solicit bid proposals.

11. DISCUSSION ITEM
A. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2022 Regional Conference and General Assembly (City Clerk)
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Conference and General Assembly will be held at the JW Marriott Desert Springs Resort and Spa in Palm Desert, CA on Thursday, May 5, 2022.

Each year, SCAG’s member cities select a Delegate and/or Alternate to represent their City and participate at the conference.

City Clerk Quintanar summarized the Staff Report.

Motion/Second: Nefulda/Hasselbrink
Unanimously Carried: The City Council:

1. Appointed Council Member Ron Bates to attend and serve as the City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 10 ends

City’s Voting Delegate for the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly; and,

2. Appointed Mayor Pro Tem Tanya Doby to attend and serve as the City’s Alternate Voting Delegate in the event of the Voting Delegate’s absence.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye
B. Appointment for Los Alamitos Community Foundation (Recreation) This report provides relevant information by which the City Council may appoint two members from the City Council to the Los Alamitos Community Foundation.

Mayor Hasselbrink, Mayor Pro Tem Doby, Council Member Chirco, and Council Member Nefulda expressed in interest in serving on the Foundation.

Motion/Second: Doby/Chirco
Unanimously Carried: The City Council appointed Shelley Hasselbrink and Mark Chirco to sit on the Board of the Los Alamitos Community Foundation.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye
C. Update to the Los Alamitos Urban Forest Program
(Development Services)
City Council adopted the Parkway Tree Program in the late 1990s. The proposed Urban Forest Program is a three-tiered approach that will provided guidance to staff on planting and maintaining trees, provide the community a Tree Dedication Memorial Program, and make the City eligible for Tree City USA status. Staff will bring to Council a finalized program for approval after receiving feedback.

Development Services Director Noda summarized the staff report and provided a PowerPoint.

City Council and Staff discussed the following points:

City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 11 ends

• Requirements for tree trimming
• Applying for a permit
• Preference for having a replacement tree ready before removing a tree
• Ability to pick a park for the tree to be planted
• Approved Tree List
• Goal to increase the amount of trees in the City to help build community and provide beautiful streetscapes
• Application process to become a Tree City, USA
The City Council:

1. Discussed the Urban Forest Program; and,

2. Provided feedback to Staff on recommendation on the updated Los Alamitos Tree Policy; and,

3. Provided feedback to Staff on recommendation on the Los Alamitos Tree Dedication Memorial Program; and,

4. Directed Staff to proceed with developing a plan to be eligible for Tree City USA recognition.

D. Additional Waste Hauler Service Options & Transition Update (Development Services)
Staff and the City’s Waste Hauler have identified additional service options that will offer residents and business owners greater choices in the type of carts and bins that are available to them. The following staff report summarizes these new options and established the rate for 96-gallon cart and 2 yard bins should a resident or business request them.

Development Services Director Noda summarized the staff report and provided a PowerPoint.

Council and Staff discussed the following:
• Ability to work with businesses who have concrete bin enclosures • Availability of service audits to ensure needs are being met • Unfunded State Mandate
• Preference for a simplified website to highlight the most important information
• Concern regarding the user ability to navigate Universal Waste Systems website for service information
City Council Adjourned Regular Minutes
February 28, 2022

Page 12 ends

Motion/Second: Bates/Doby
Unanimously Carried: The City Council:

1. Discussed the proposed rate establishment; and,

2. Authorized the City Manager to accept the rate establishment and execute any needed documents to enact the rates.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Hasselbrink Aye
Mayor Pro Tem Doby Aye
Council Member Bates Aye
Council Member Chirco Aye
Council Member Nefulda Aye

12. CLOSED SESSION
A. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
Authority: Government Code Section 54957
Mayor Hasselbrink advised Closed Session would not be held.

13. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council adjourned at 8:11 p.m.

Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
Attest:

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
SPECIAL MEETING – March 7, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER
The City Council met in Special Session at 6:01 p.m., Monday, March 7, 2022, in the Council Chamber located at 3191 Katella Ave., Los Alamitos, CA 90720, Mayor Hasselbrink presiding.

2. ROLL CALL

Present: Council Members: Bates, Chirco, Nefulda,
Mayor Pro Tem Doby, Mayor Hasselbrink

Absent: Council Members: None

3. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Public Hearing #4 to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries and Select a Preferred District Boundary Map (City Clerk)
Pursuant to Elections Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps following each decennial federal census to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The deadline for cities to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

Dr. Justin Levitt, National Demographic Corporation (NDC), gave a PowerPoint Presentation and explained that census data is provided by the Federal Government with census blocks being the smallest unit of census geography divided by jurisdictional boundaries or natural features visible on a map. Dividing a census block is feasible under very narrow sense of circumstances and/or by a court order and it leads to uncertainty regarding population.

City Council Special Minutes
March 7, 2022

Page 2 ends

Mayor Hasselbrink opened the Public Hearing for comments.

Maggie Marchese, resident, referred to Map 4 and stated a preference for keeping the one block on Farquhar in District 4 and keeping Carrier Row and Apartment Row together.

Mayor Hasselbrink closed the Public Hearing for comments.

Council and Staff discussed the following:
• Concern regarding Map 4 and District 1 picking up more of Apartment Row
• Use of the NDC web viewer to show the population density in each of the census blocks
• Ability for the Council and public to draw their own maps for consideration
• Dramatic changes to the boundaries in Map 2 with Apartment Row and Map 4 impacting District 1
• Proposed maps do not divide any census blocks
• Future growth can only be accounted for up to a 10% population deviation
• Concern for disjointed boundaries of District 1
• Preference for working with Map 2 as a base since it had a total population deviation of 3.05% and allowed for the most leigh way to make modifications
• Districts 4 and 5 are on the same election cycle and neither District were shown to lose any population
Motion/Second: Hasselbrink/Doby
Motion: Direct Staff to start with Map 2 and incorporate changes based off of comments received.

Council and Staff discussed the following:
• Population deviations between Map 2 and 3
• Approved maps are valid for 10 years regardless of population changes that occur after adoption
• Map 3 closely resembles current district boundaries
• Redistricting is triggered by release of Census data and not a deviation in population
• Preference to keep District 2 together and boundaries along the same roads
City Council Special Minutes
March 7, 2022

Page 3 ends

Motion/Second: Hasselbrink/Doby
Carried 3/2 (Bates and Nefulda voted No): Directed Staff to start with Map 2 and incorporate changes based off of comments received.

4. CLOSED SESSION
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
City Negotiator: Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney
Employee/Organization: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Authority: Government Code Section 54957.6
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: City Manager
Authority: Government Code Section 54957
City Attorney Daudt read the item aloud.

RECESS
The City Council recessed into Closed Session at6:42 p.m.

RECONVENE
The City Council reconvened in Special Session at 6:59 p.m.

City Attorney Daudt stated there was no reportable action.

5. ADJOURNMENT
The City Council adjourned at 6:59 p.m.

Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
Attest:

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

1654466.1
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 10B
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council From: Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney
Subject: Findings Required by AB 361 for the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for Meetings

SUMMARY
For the City Council to continue to have the option to meet via teleconference during the pandemic, AB 361 requires the City Council make specific findings at least every thirty (30) days.

RECOMMENDATION
Make the following findings by a majority vote of the City Council:

1. A state of emergency has been proclaimed by California’s Governor due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and continues to be in effect; and,

2. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and,

3. State and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSION
Assembly Bill 361 (AB 361) was signed into law by the Governor on September 16, 2021.

A portion of AB 361 enacted amendments to California Government Code section 54953 regarding teleconference meetings. Those amendments authorize local agencies, like the City, to continue to conduct meetings by teleconference1 during a Governor-proclaimed state of emergency2 provided that certain findings are made by the legislative body, and provided that certain procedural requirements are met regarding public access to the meetings.
1 A “teleconference” occurs for purposes of AB 361 whenever one or more members of the City Council connect to a City Council meeting via electronic means. Thus, even if four members of the City Council meet in person, if the fifth joins the meeting via Zoom, the meeting will be a teleconference meeting that must be conducted in accordance with the requirements of AB 361. 2 For purposes of AB 361 “…’state of emergency’ means a state of emergency proclaimed pursuant to Section 8625 of the California Emergency Services Act…” Cal. Gov’t Code Sec. 54953(e)(4). Section 8265 of CESA in turn refers to a state of emergency proclaimed by the Governor AB 361 Teleconference Findings
March 21, 2022

Page 2 ends

1654466.1
A new requirement in AB 361 requires specific findings be reaffirmed at least every thirty (30) days in order for the City Council to continue to have the option for one (1) or more of its members to use teleconferencing.

The Required Findings
The teleconference provisions in AB 361 may only be utilized as long as a Governorproclaimed state of emergency remains active, or while state or local officials have recommended measures to promote social distancing. When either of those is the case (both are true at this time), then in order to continue to teleconference using the new provisions of AB 361, the City Council must make the following findings by majority vote every 30 days:
(A) The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and
(B) Either of the following circumstances exist:
(i) The state of emergency continues to directly impact the ability of the members to meet safely in person; or
(ii) State or local officials continue to impose or recommend measures to promote social distancing3.

To comply with that requirement, the recommended action would have the City Council find each of the following:

1. A state of emergency has been proclaimed by California’s Governor due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and continues to be in effect; and,

2. The City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the state of emergency; and,

3. State and local officials continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19.

The “Every 30 Days Thereafter” Requirement
As noted above, AB 361 findings must be made “no later than 30 days after teleconferencing for the first time pursuant to [AB 361], and every 30 days thereafter…” In order to preserve the option for the City Council or individual members of the City Council to participate in meetings during the pandemic via teleconference in the future, the City Council will have to adopt the required findings at least every 30 days.

Potential Consequence of Not Making the Findings Every 30 Days AB 361 does not expressly state what happens if a legislative body fails to make the required findings “every 30 days.” However, it expressly requires the timely re-approval of the findings “in order to continue to teleconference” in the manner that AB 361 authorizes.
3 Cal Gov’t Code Sec. 54953(e)(3)
AB 361 Teleconference Findings
March 21, 2022

Page 3 ends

1654466.1
As a result, if the City Council does not adopt the required findings every 30 days, then the City Council could be precluded from continuing to teleconference thereafter, perhaps even if the City Council was willing to adopt the findings at a later date. For this reason, the City Attorney recommends that the City Council adopt the required findings at this time and at least every 30 days thereafter, unless the City Council decides as a permanent matter that it will no longer permit teleconferencing at all (e.g., regardless of whether the state of emergency worsens).

Procedural Requirements for The Conduct of Teleconference Meetings AB 361 contains several new requirements for the conduct of teleconference meetings with which the City has prepared to comply. Specifically, each meeting must:

1. Allow members of the public to attend and comment at the meeting via call-in option or internet-based service option; and,

2. Protect the statutory and constitutional rights of the parties and the public appearing before the legislative body; and,

3. In the event of disruption which prevents broadcasting the meeting or which prevents members of the public from offering public comments via the call-in or internet-based option, the City Council must take no further action until the disrupted public access is restored; and,

4. The City may not require public comments to be submitted in advance, and must offer the opportunity for the public to offer comments “in real time” during the meeting; and,

5. The public must be allowed “a reasonable amount of time per agenda item to allow members of the public to provide public comment, including time for members of the public to register [to log into the teleconference], or otherwise be recognized for the purpose of providing public comment.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

Submitted by: Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 10C
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Subject: Amendment to the Resolution Establishing Salaries and Benefits for Non-Represented Employees to Include
Management Analyst

SUMMARY
This report outlines the personnel change for the Administration Department, City Manager’s Office.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-09, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST”; and,

2. Adopt Resolution No. 2022-10, entitled, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE

SALARIES AND BENEFITS FOR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO
INCLUDE MANAGEMENT ANALYST”; and,

3. Approve a budget amendment for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 in the Administration Department for an additional $32,260 for a full-time Management Analyst position.

BACKGROUND
As part of the city wide personnel changes, the City Manager’s Office identified personnel changes that are desired to maintain services and increase City wide efficiency. This report outlines the proposed implementation of a full-time Management Analyst position.

The Administration Department is in need of administrative support to work at optimal level. The Management Analyst will offer administrative support to the City Manager, Administrative Services Manager, and City Clerk.

Personnel Changes – Management Analyst Administration
March 21, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION
The full-time Management Analyst will report to the City Manager’s office, perform administrative, financial, human resources, statistical and other management analyses in support of departmental or City-wide activities. This person will also assists in the development and review of policies, procedures, work methods, budget development and implementation, and perform related professional and administrative duties as assigned, including without limitation: taking the lead on special projects of organizational-wide significance; conducting studies; making recommendations; implementing programs; analyzing legislation; identifying potential organizational impacts; preparing technical reports; developing and implementing City policy processes and programs to meet legislative requirements; and communicating changes to the organization.

Resolution No. 2022-09 seeks to approve the job description for the Management Analyst. Working closely with confidential information from the Human Resources department and City Manager’s office, Staff recommends adding the Management Analyst position to the Non-Represented Confidential Employee Group. This position was not previously included in Non-Represented Employees Resolution. There are no proposed changes to any of the terms and conditions of employment for the NonRepresented Employees previously approved in Resolution 2021-25. The job description and respective salary schedules are included.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact for FY 2021-2022 would be approximately $25,834 (assuming 3 month remaining of FY 2021-2022) which includes the associated increase in benefit-related costs for the full-time Management Analyst. Funding for this position is available within the currently allocated budget and does not require a budget adjustment at this time. The total annual cost for the Budget Analyst, including benefits, is $103,3377, and will be included in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget.

Submitted by: Chelsi A. Wilson, Administrative Services Manger Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Craig Koehler, Finance Director Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2022-09 - Management Analyst Job Description

2. Resolution No. 2022-10 – Non-Represented Salary Schedule RESOLUTION NO. 2022-09

A RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A JOB

DESCRIPTION FOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
WHEREAS, City staff has prepared a job description for the Full-Time, Non-Represented position – Management Analyst; and,
WHEREAS, if approved, the new job description will be effective March 21, 2022.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS
ALAMITOS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Los Alamitos, California, finds that the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The City Council Approves the job description for Management Analyst (Exhibit A).

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March 2022. ________________________________
Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney
Attachment 1
CC RESO 2022-09

Page 2 of 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS )
I, Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk, of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council held on the 28th day of February, 2022, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
________________________________________
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Job Description

MANAGEMENT ANALYST

THE POSITION
Under administrative direction, performs administrative, financial, human resources, statistical and other management analyses in support of departmental or citywide activities, functions and programs; assists in the development and review of policies, procedures, work methods, and budget development and implementation; and performs related duties as assigned.

ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS
The Management Analyst performs professional and administrative duties. Takes the lead on special projects of organizational-wide significance; works individually and as part of a team; conducts studies; makes recommendations; implements programs.

Analyzes legislation; identifies potential organizational impacts; prepares technical reports; develops and implements City policy processes and programs to meet legislative requirements; communicates changes to the organization.

Prepares and reviews City Council staff reports and reviews all department staff reports; serves as the point person for composition and/or review of correspondence on behalf of the department.

This job has greater statutory knowledge, the complexity of project design and policy evaluation, lesser direction received, and greater understanding of the principles of public and business administration, human resources, and finance. Positions in this classification can plan, organize, and conduct studies, develop budgets, write grants, evaluate performance, and assess the feasibility and costs of different programs and services.

Coordinates programs and activities with other departments; confers with representatives of other agencies, groups, vendors or the public; Conducts special studies and surveys and prepares a variety of reports, correspondence and other materials. May plan and coordinate community events and programs. May supervise the work of support staff on a project or day-to-day basis.

Establishes positive working relationships with City employees, outside agencies, and the public.

DESIRABLE KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Knowledge of: Principles, practices and methods of administrative and organizational analysis; public administration policies and procedures; business computer applications, particularly as related to statistical analysis and data management; financial/statistical/comparative analysis techniques; budget development and administration Exhibit A
methodologies; effective business communications and correct English usage, including spelling, grammar and punctuation; marketing, writing, and research techniques, methods, and procedures, and report presentation techniques; database administration practices; department administrative policies; City organization, ordinances, rules, programs, policies and procedures applicable to departmental operations; basic functions of public agencies, including the role of an elected Council and appointed boards and commissions; rules and procedures governing the notice and conduct of public meetings; word processing, spreadsheet, graphics, and accounting software.

Ability to: Analyze administrative, operational and organizational problems, evaluate alternatives and reach sound conclusions; collect, evaluate and interpret varied data, either in statistical or narrative form; interpret and apply laws, regulations, policies and procedures; prepare clear and concise reports, and other written materials; maintain accurate records and files; coordinate multiple projects and meet critical deadlines; exercise sound judgment within established guidelines; communicate clearly, concisely and effectively, orally and in writing; use tact, discretion and sensitivity in dealing with sensitive situations; establish and maintain effective working relationships with elected and appointed City officials and boards, other public agencies, employees, citizen groups, and the public; operate computer-based word processing, spreadsheet, desktop publishing and database management software and art and graphics equipment.

DESIRABLE EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING
Graduation from a four-year college or university with major course work in business or public administration and two years of professional experience in administrative and management analysis; or an equivalent combination of training and experience.

Possession of a valid California Driver License, Class C is required by date of employment.

Successful completion of background check and pre-hire physical including drug screen is required.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS

ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE SALARIES AND

BENEFITS FOR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES TO INCLUDE

MANAGEMENT ANALYST
WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-25 establishing the salaries and benefits for Non-Represetend Employees (“Salaries and Benefits Resolution”); and,
WHEREAS, on February 28, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-07 amending the Salaries and Benefits Resolution to include the Full-Time Finance Manager position; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Los Alamitos desires to amend the Salaries and Benefits Resolution to include the Management Analyst position to the list of Confidential Employees.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Los Alamitos, California, finds that the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Section 3, Subsection C.3. of Resolution 2021-25 is hereby amended to state:

C. EMPLOYEE OR NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE:

3. Confidential employees are the following positions: Public Works Supervisor, Recreation Supervisor, Assistant to the City Manager, Deputy City Clerk, Benefits Coordinator/Executive Assistant, and Management Analyst.

SECTION 3. The Non-Represented Employees Salary Schedule, updated to include the Management Analyst position, attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby approved and appended to the Salaries and Benefits Resolution and shall supersede and replace the Exihibit A – Salary Schedule approved by Resolution Nos. 2021-25 and 2022-

01. SECTION 4. Except as expressly modified by this Resolution, the Salaries and Benefits Resolution shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. .

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

Attachment 2
CC RESO 2022-10

Page 2 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March 2022. _______________________________
Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS )
I, Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 21st of March, 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
________________________________________
Windmera Quintanar , MMC, City Clerk

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 215 Management Analyst 2 C - E HOURLY 36.43 38.25 40.16 42.17 44.28 MONTHLY 6,314.53 6,630.00 6,961.07 7,309.47 7,675.20
ANNUAL 75,774.40 79,560.00 83,532.80 87,713.60 92,102.40 310 Benefits Coordinator/Executive Asst 2 C - E HOURLY 32.33 34.05 35.83 37.72 39.71 MONTHLY 5,603.87 5,902.00 6,210.53 6,538.13 6,883.07
ANNUAL 67,246.40 70,824.00 74,526.40 78,457.60 82,596.80 324 Recreation Supervisor 2 MM - E HOURLY 33.25 35.07 37.00 39.03 41.18 328 Public Works Supervisor MONTHLY 5,763.33 6,078.80 6,413.33 6,765.20 7,137.87 ANNUAL 69,160.00 72,945.60 76,960.00 81,182.40 85,654.40 330 Assistant to the City Manager 1 C - E HOURLY 41.39 43.46 45.63 47.92 50.32 MONTHLY 7,174.27 7,533.07 7,909.20 8,306.13 8,722.13
ANNUAL 86,091.20 90,396.80 94,910.40 99,673.60 104,665.60 2 HOURLY 38.37 40.28 42.29 44.40 46.64
MONTHLY 6,650.80 6,981.87 7,330.27 7,696.00 8,084.27
ANNUAL 79,809.60 83,782.40 87,963.20 92,352.00 97,011.20 340 Finance Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 44.08 46.28 48.60 51.02 53.57 MONTHLY 7,640.53 8,021.87 8,424.00 8,843.47 9,285.47
ANNUAL 91,686.40 96,262.40 101,088.00 106,121.60 111,425.60 355 Recreation Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 41.42 44.08 46.88 49.88 53.06 MONTHLY 7,179.47 7,640.53 8,125.87 8,645.87 9,197.07
ANNUAL 86,153.60 91,686.40 97,510.40 103,750.40 110,364.80 2 HOURLY 40.46 42.46 44.54 46.39 48.20
MONTHLY 7,013.07 7,359.73 7,720.27 8,040.93 8,354.67
ANNUAL 84,156.80 88,316.80 92,643.20 96,491.20 100,256.00 362 Administrative Services Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 44.08 46.28 48.60 51.02 53.57 MONTHLY 7,640.53 8,021.87 8,424.00 8,843.47 9,285.47
ANNUAL 91,686.40 96,262.40 101,088.00 106,121.60 111,425.60 365 Development Services Manager 2 MM-E HOURLY 44.08 46.28 48.60 51.02 53.57 MONTHLY 7,640.53 8,021.87 8,424.00 8,843.47 9,285.47
ANNUAL 91,686.40 96,262.40 101,088.00 106,121.60 111,425.60 370 City Clerk 1 A - E HOURLY 42.35 44.47 46.71 49.04 51.49 MONTHLY 7,340.67 7,708.13 8,096.40 8,500.27 8,924.93
ANNUAL 88,088.00 92,497.60 97,156.80 102,003.20 107,099.20 2 HOURLY 39.24 41.22 43.27 45.43 47.69
MONTHLY 6,801.60 7,144.80 7,500.13 7,874.53 8,266.27
ANNUAL 81,619.20 85,737.60 90,001.60 94,494.40 99,195.20 373 City Clerk/ Director of Communications 1 A - E HOURLY 44.47 46.71 49.04 51.49 54.06 MONTHLY 7,708.13 8,096.40 8,500.27 8,924.93 9,370.40
ANNUAL 92,497.60 97,156.80 102,003.20 107,099.20 112,444.80 2 HOURLY 41.22 43.27 45.43 47.69 50.08
MONTHLY 7,144.80 7,500.13 7,874.53 8,266.27 8,680.53
ANNUAL 85,737.60 90,001.60 94,494.40 99,195.20 104,166.40 380 Support Services Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 50.33 52.85 55.49 58.26 61.17 MONTHLY 8,723.87 9,160.67 9,618.27 10,098.40 10,602.80
ANNUAL 104,686.40 109,928.00 115,419.20 121,180.80 127,233.60 2 HOURLY 46.64 48.96 51.41 53.99 56.69
MONTHLY 8,084.27 8,486.40 8,911.07 9,358.27 9,826.27
ANNUAL 97,011.20 101,836.80 106,932.80 112,299.20 117,915.20

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES

SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 7, 2021

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 405 Finance Director 1 A - E HOURLY 54.61 60.05 65.53 70.24 76.44 MONTHLY 9,465.73 10,408.67 11,358.53 12,174.93 13,249.60 ANNUAL 113,588.80 124,904.00 136,302.40 146,099.20 158,995.20 2 HOURLY 50.59 55.65 60.70 65.10 70.83
MONTHLY 8,768.93 9,646.00 10,521.33 11,284.00 12,277.20 ANNUAL 105,227.20 115,752.00 126,256.00 135,408.00 147,326.40 390 Police Captain 1 MM - E HOURLY 62.90 66.05 69.36 72.82 76.47 MONTHLY 10,902.67 11,448.67 12,022.40 12,622.13 13,254.80 ANNUAL 130,832.00 137,384.00 144,268.80 151,465.60 159,057.60 2 HOURLY 57.76 60.65 63.68 66.87 70.22
MONTHLY 10,011.73 10,512.67 11,037.87 11,590.80 12,171.47 ANNUAL 120,140.80 126,152.00 132,454.40 139,089.60 146,057.60 400 Administrative Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 57.34 63.07 68.81 73.76 80.26 430 Recreation & Community Svcs Director MONTHLY 9,938.93 10,932.13 11,927.07 12,785.07 13,911.73 ANNUAL 119,267.20 131,185.60 143,124.80 153,420.80 166,940.80 2 HOURLY 53.13 58.44 63.76 68.35 74.36
MONTHLY 9,209.20 10,129.60 11,051.73 11,847.33 12,889.07 ANNUAL 110,510.40 121,555.20 132,620.80 142,168.00 154,668.80 410 Development Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 60.21 66.22 72.25 77.44 84.27 MONTHLY 10,436.40 11,478.13 12,523.33 13,422.93 14,606.80 ANNUAL 125,236.80 137,737.60 150,280.00 161,075.20 175,281.60 2 HOURLY 55.78 61.36 66.92 71.77 78.08
MONTHLY 9,668.53 10,635.73 11,599.47 12,440.13 13,533.87 ANNUAL 116,022.40 127,628.80 139,193.60 149,281.60 162,406.40 440 Police Chief 1 A - E HOURLY 66.71 73.36 80.04 86.70 93.38 MONTHLY 11,563.07 12,715.73 13,873.60 15,028.00 16,185.87 ANNUAL 138,756.80 152,588.80 166,483.20 180,336.00 194,230.40 2 HOURLY 61.24 67.36 73.48 79.61 85.74
MONTHLY 10,614.93 11,675.73 12,736.53 13,799.07 14,861.60 ANNUAL 127,379.20 140,108.80 152,838.40 165,588.80 178,339.20 500 City Manager n/a A - E City Manager salary is set by contract with the City Council.

Employment Category Fair Labor Standards Act Classification A = At Will E = Exempt from overtime
C = Confidential
MM = Mid-management
Tier 1 represents the salary ranges for non-represented employees appointed before December 16, 2013.

Tier 2 represent the salary ranges for non-represented employees appointed after December 16, 2013.

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 215 Management Analyst 2 C - E HOURLY 37.16 39.02 40.96 43.01 45.17 MONTHLY 6,441.07 6,763.47 7,099.73 7,455.07 7,829.47
ANNUAL 77,292.80 81,161.60 85,196.80 89,460.80 93,953.60 310 Benefits Coordinator/Executive Asst 2 C - E HOURLY 32.98 34.73 36.55 38.47 40.50 MONTHLY 5,716.53 6,019.87 6,335.33 6,668.13 7,020.00
ANNUAL 68,598.40 72,238.40 76,024.00 80,017.60 84,240.00 324 Recreation Supervisor 2 MM - E HOURLY 33.92 35.77 37.74 39.81 42.00 328 Public Works Supervisor MONTHLY 5,879.47 6,200.13 6,541.60 6,900.40 7,280.00 ANNUAL 70,553.60 74,401.60 78,499.20 82,804.80 87,360.00 330 Assistant to the City Manager 1 C - E HOURLY 42.22 44.33 46.54 48.88 51.33 MONTHLY 7,318.13 7,683.87 8,066.93 8,472.53 8,897.20
ANNUAL 87,817.60 92,206.40 96,803.20 101,670.40 106,766.40 2 HOURLY 39.14 41.09 43.14 45.29 47.57
MONTHLY 6,784.27 7,122.27 7,477.60 7,850.27 8,245.47
ANNUAL 81,411.20 85,467.20 89,731.20 94,203.20 98,945.60 340 Finance Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 44.96 47.21 49.57 52.04 54.64 MONTHLY 7,793.07 8,183.07 8,592.13 9,020.27 9,470.93
ANNUAL 93,516.80 98,196.80 103,105.60 108,243.20 113,651.20 355 Recreation Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 42.25 44.96 47.82 50.88 54.12 MONTHLY 7,323.33 7,793.07 8,288.80 8,819.20 9,380.80
ANNUAL 87,880.00 93,516.80 99,465.60 105,830.40 112,569.60 2 HOURLY 41.27 43.31 45.43 47.32 49.16
MONTHLY 7,153.47 7,507.07 7,874.53 8,202.13 8,521.07
ANNUAL 85,841.60 90,084.80 94,494.40 98,425.60 102,252.80 362 Administrative Services Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 44.96 47.21 49.57 52.04 54.64 MONTHLY 7,793.07 8,183.07 8,592.13 9,020.27 9,470.93
ANNUAL 93,516.80 98,196.80 103,105.60 108,243.20 113,651.20 365 Development Services Manager 2 MM-E HOURLY 44.96 47.21 49.57 52.04 54.64 MONTHLY 7,793.07 8,183.07 8,592.13 9,020.27 9,470.93
ANNUAL 93,516.80 98,196.80 103,105.60 108,243.20 113,651.20 370 City Clerk 1 A - E HOURLY 43.20 45.36 47.64 50.02 52.52 MONTHLY 7,488.00 7,862.40 8,257.60 8,670.13 9,103.47
ANNUAL 89,856.00 94,348.80 99,091.20 104,041.60 109,241.60 2 HOURLY 40.02 42.04 44.14 46.34 48.64
MONTHLY 6,936.80 7,286.93 7,650.93 8,032.27 8,430.93
ANNUAL 83,241.60 87,443.20 91,811.20 96,387.20 101,171.20 373 City Clerk/ Director of Communication 1 A - E HOURLY 45.36 47.64 50.02 52.52 55.14 MONTHLY 7,862.40 8,257.60 8,670.13 9,103.47 9,557.60
ANNUAL 94,348.80 99,091.20 104,041.60 109,241.60 114,691.20 2 HOURLY 42.04 44.14 46.34 48.64 51.08
MONTHLY 7,286.93 7,650.93 8,032.27 8,430.93 8,853.87
ANNUAL 87,443.20 91,811.20 96,387.20 101,171.20 106,246.40 380 Support Services Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 51.34 53.91 56.60 59.43 62.39 MONTHLY 8,898.93 9,344.40 9,810.67 10,301.20 10,814.27
ANNUAL 106,787.20 112,132.80 117,728.00 123,614.40 129,771.20 2 HOURLY 47.57 49.94 52.44 55.07 57.82
MONTHLY 8,245.47 8,656.27 9,089.60 9,545.47 10,022.13
ANNUAL 98,945.60 103,875.20 109,075.20 114,545.60 120,265.60

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES

SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 6, 2022

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES

SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 6, 2022

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 405 Finance Director 1 A - E HOURLY 55.70 61.25 66.84 71.64 77.97 MONTHLY 9,654.67 10,616.67 11,585.60 12,417.60 13,514.80 ANNUAL 115,856.00 127,400.00 139,027.20 149,011.20 162,177.60 2 HOURLY 51.60 56.76 61.91 66.40 72.25
MONTHLY 8,944.00 9,838.40 10,731.07 11,509.33 12,523.33 ANNUAL 107,328.00 118,060.80 128,772.80 138,112.00 150,280.00 390 Police Captain 1 MM - E HOURLY 64.16 67.37 70.75 74.28 78.00 MONTHLY 11,121.07 11,677.47 12,263.33 12,875.20 13,520.00 ANNUAL 133,452.80 140,129.60 147,160.00 154,502.40 162,240.00 2 HOURLY 58.92 61.86 64.95 68.21 71.62
MONTHLY 10,212.80 10,722.40 11,258.00 11,823.07 12,414.13 ANNUAL 122,553.60 128,668.80 135,096.00 141,876.80 148,969.60 400 Administrative Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 58.49 64.33 70.19 75.24 81.87 430 Recreation & Community Svcs Director MONTHLY 10,138.27 11,150.53 12,166.27 13,041.60 14,190.80 ANNUAL 121,659.20 133,806.40 145,995.20 156,499.20 170,289.60 2 HOURLY 54.19 59.61 65.04 69.72 75.85
MONTHLY 9,392.93 10,332.40 11,273.60 12,084.80 13,147.33 ANNUAL 112,715.20 123,988.80 135,283.20 145,017.60 157,768.00 410 Development Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 61.41 67.54 73.70 78.99 85.96 MONTHLY 10,644.40 11,706.93 12,774.67 13,691.60 14,899.73 ANNUAL 127,732.80 140,483.20 153,296.00 164,299.20 178,796.80 2 HOURLY 56.90 62.59 68.26 73.21 79.64
MONTHLY 9,862.67 10,848.93 11,831.73 12,689.73 13,804.27 ANNUAL 118,352.00 130,187.20 141,980.80 152,276.80 165,651.20 440 Police Chief 1 A - E HOURLY 68.04 74.83 81.64 88.43 95.25 MONTHLY 11,793.60 12,970.53 14,150.93 15,327.87 16,510.00 ANNUAL 141,523.20 155,646.40 169,811.20 183,934.40 198,120.00 2 HOURLY 62.46 68.71 74.95 81.20 87.45
MONTHLY 10,826.40 11,909.73 12,991.33 14,074.67 15,158.00 ANNUAL 129,916.80 142,916.80 155,896.00 168,896.00 181,896.00 500 City Manager n/a A - E City Manager salary is set by contract with the City Council.

Tier 2 represent the salary ranges for non-represented employees appointed after December 16, 2013.

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 215 Management Analyst 2 C - E HOURLY 37.90 39.80 41.78 43.87 46.07 MONTHLY 6,569.33 6,898.67 7,241.87 7,604.13 7,985.47
ANNUAL 78,832.00 82,784.00 86,902.40 91,249.60 95,825.60 310 Benefits Coordinator/Executive Asst 2 C - E HOURLY 33.64 35.42 37.28 39.24 41.31 MONTHLY 5,830.93 6,139.47 6,461.87 6,801.60 7,160.40
ANNUAL 69,971.20 73,673.60 77,542.40 81,619.20 85,924.80 324 Recreation Supervisor 2 MM - E HOURLY 34.60 36.49 38.49 40.61 42.84 328 Public Works Supervisor MONTHLY 5,997.33 6,324.93 6,671.60 7,039.07 7,425.60 ANNUAL 71,968.00 75,899.20 80,059.20 84,468.80 89,107.20 330 Assistant to the City Manager 1 C - E HOURLY 43.06 45.22 47.47 49.86 52.36 MONTHLY 7,463.73 7,838.13 8,228.13 8,642.40 9,075.73
ANNUAL 89,564.80 94,057.60 98,737.60 103,708.80 108,908.80 2 HOURLY 39.92 41.91 44.00 46.20 48.52
MONTHLY 6,919.47 7,264.40 7,626.67 8,008.00 8,410.13
ANNUAL 83,033.60 87,172.80 91,520.00 96,096.00 100,921.60 340 Finance Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 45.86 48.15 50.56 53.08 55.73 MONTHLY 7,949.07 8,346.00 8,763.73 9,200.53 9,659.87
ANNUAL 95,388.80 100,152.00 105,164.80 110,406.40 115,918.40 355 Recreation Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 43.10 45.86 48.78 51.90 55.20 MONTHLY 7,470.67 7,949.07 8,455.20 8,996.00 9,568.00
ANNUAL 89,648.00 95,388.80 101,462.40 107,952.00 114,816.00 2 HOURLY 42.10 44.18 46.34 48.27 50.14
MONTHLY 7,297.33 7,657.87 8,032.27 8,366.80 8,690.93
ANNUAL 87,568.00 91,894.40 96,387.20 100,401.60 104,291.20 362 Administrative Services Manager 2 A - E HOURLY 45.86 48.15 50.56 53.08 55.73 MONTHLY 7,949.07 8,346.00 8,763.73 9,200.53 9,659.87
ANNUAL 95,388.80 100,152.00 105,164.80 110,406.40 115,918.40 365 Development Services Manager 2 MM-E HOURLY 45.86 48.15 50.56 53.08 55.73 MONTHLY 7,949.07 8,346.00 8,763.73 9,200.53 9,659.87
ANNUAL 95,388.80 100,152.00 105,164.80 110,406.40 115,918.40 370 City Clerk 1 A - E HOURLY 44.06 46.27 48.59 51.02 53.57 MONTHLY 7,637.07 8,020.13 8,422.27 8,843.47 9,285.47
ANNUAL 91,644.80 96,241.60 101,067.20 106,121.60 111,425.60 2 HOURLY 40.82 42.88 45.02 47.27 49.61
MONTHLY 7,075.47 7,432.53 7,803.47 8,193.47 8,599.07
ANNUAL 84,905.60 89,190.40 93,641.60 98,321.60 103,188.80 373 City Clerk/ Director of Communication 1 A - E HOURLY 46.27 48.59 51.02 53.57 56.24 MONTHLY 8,020.13 8,422.27 8,843.47 9,285.47 9,748.27
ANNUAL 96,241.60 101,067.20 106,121.60 111,425.60 116,979.20 2 HOURLY 42.88 45.02 47.27 49.61 52.10
MONTHLY 7,432.53 7,803.47 8,193.47 8,599.07 9,030.67
ANNUAL 89,190.40 93,641.60 98,321.60 103,188.80 108,368.00 380 Support Services Manager 1 MM - E HOURLY 52.37 54.99 57.73 60.62 63.64 MONTHLY 9,077.47 9,531.60 10,006.53 10,507.47 11,030.93 ANNUAL 108,929.60 114,379.20 120,078.40 126,089.60 132,371.20 2 HOURLY 48.52 50.94 53.49 56.17 58.98
MONTHLY 8,410.13 8,829.60 9,271.60 9,736.13 10,223.20
ANNUAL 100,921.60 105,955.20 111,259.20 116,833.60 122,678.40

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT & NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES

SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 5, 2023

EXHIBIT A

CODE CLASSIFICATION TITLE TIER CATGY/FLSA STEP A STEP B STEP C STEP D STEP E 405 Finance Director 1 A - E HOURLY 56.81 62.48 68.18 73.07 79.53 MONTHLY 9,847.07 10,829.87 11,817.87 12,665.47 13,785.20 ANNUAL 118,164.80 129,958.40 141,814.40 151,985.60 165,422.40 2 HOURLY 52.63 57.90 63.15 67.73 73.70
MONTHLY 9,122.53 10,036.00 10,946.00 11,739.87 12,774.67 ANNUAL 109,470.40 120,432.00 131,352.00 140,878.40 153,296.00 390 Police Captain 1 MM - E HOURLY 65.44 68.72 72.17 75.77 79.56 MONTHLY 11,342.93 11,911.47 12,509.47 13,133.47 13,790.40 ANNUAL 136,115.20 142,937.60 150,113.60 157,601.60 165,484.80 2 HOURLY 60.10 63.10 66.25 69.57 73.05
MONTHLY 10,417.33 10,937.33 11,483.33 12,058.80 12,662.00 ANNUAL 125,008.00 131,248.00 137,800.00 144,705.60 151,944.00 400 Administrative Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 59.66 65.62 71.59 76.74 83.51 430 Recreation & Community Svcs Director MONTHLY 10,341.07 11,374.13 12,408.93 13,301.60 14,475.07 ANNUAL 124,092.80 136,489.60 148,907.20 159,619.20 173,700.80 2 HOURLY 55.27 60.80 66.34 71.11 77.37
MONTHLY 9,580.13 10,538.67 11,498.93 12,325.73 13,410.80 ANNUAL 114,961.60 126,464.00 137,987.20 147,908.80 160,929.60 410 Development Services Director 1 A - E HOURLY 62.64 68.89 75.17 80.57 87.68 MONTHLY 10,857.60 11,940.93 13,029.47 13,965.47 15,197.87 ANNUAL 130,291.20 143,291.20 156,353.60 167,585.60 182,374.40 2 HOURLY 58.04 63.84 69.63 74.67 81.23
MONTHLY 10,060.27 11,065.60 12,069.20 12,942.80 14,079.87 ANNUAL 120,723.20 132,787.20 144,830.40 155,313.60 168,958.40 440 Police Chief 1 A - E HOURLY 69.40 76.33 83.27 90.20 97.16 MONTHLY 12,029.33 13,230.53 14,433.47 15,634.67 16,841.07 ANNUAL 144,352.00 158,766.40 173,201.60 187,616.00 202,092.80 2 HOURLY 63.71 70.08 76.45 82.82 89.20
MONTHLY 11,043.07 12,147.20 13,251.33 14,355.47 15,461.33 ANNUAL 132,516.80 145,766.40 159,016.00 172,265.60 185,536.00 500 City Manager n/a A - E City Manager salary is set by contract with the City Council.

Tier 2 represent the salary ranges for non-represented employees appointed after December 16, 2013.

City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 10D
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Ron Noda, Development Services Director
Chris Kelley, City Engineer
Subject: Notice of Completion (NOC) for Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21-04)

SUMMARY
The work for the Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21-04) has been completed. The work included repair of the damaged Cerritos Avenue Bridge guardrail.

Staff is recommending City Council accept the project as completed, direct filing of the Notice of Completion (NOC), and authorize retention release as prescribed by the Public Contracts Codes.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Accept as complete the construction by Peterson-Chase General Engineering Construction, Inc. for the Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair Project (CIP No. 20/21-04); and,

2. Direct the City Clerk to record the Notice of Completion/Final Report with the County Recorder’s Office; and,

3. Authorize Staff to release the 5% retention to the contractor, in the amount of $2,213.00 thirty-five (35) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The guard rail located in the westbound direction at the Cerritos Avenue Bridge was damaged by a motorist. The City repaired the damaged guardrail by contracting out with Peterson-Chase General Engineering Construction, Inc.

Cerritos Avenue Guardrail Repair - NOC - CIP No. 20/21-04 March 21, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

DISCUSSION
Work on this project is now complete and found acceptable by the City Engineer and Public Works staff. Staff recommends acceptance of the work in conjunction with the processing of the Notice of Completion/Final Report and release of the retention as prescribed by the Public Contracts Codes.

FISCAL IMPACT
The project had a total budget of $72,816.00. Funding for this project is as follows:
• $37,279.73 came from the Insurance Claim
• $35,536.27 from Measure M
The total project cost was $69,608.00, leaving a surplus of $3,208.00. Thus, the project came in within the approved budget.

Submitted by: Chris Kelley, City Engineer
Reviewed by: Ron Noda, Development Services Director
Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Craig Kohler, Finance Director Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Attachment: 1. CIP No. 20/21-04 Notice of Completion
1 3
4 5
Attachment 1
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 11A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing #4 (Continued) to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries and Select a Preferred District Boundary Map

SUMMARY
Pursuant to Elections Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps following each decennial federal census to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The deadline for cities to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022. This Public Hearing was continued from March 7, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Reopen the public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Select a preferred District Boundary Map; and,

3. Introduce, waive reading in full and authorize reading by title only of Ordinance No. 2022-01, and set for adoption; and,

4. City Attorney Daudt read the title of Ordinance No. 2022-01, entitled, “An

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT MAPS FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS .”

Page 2 of 7 ends

elections pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010 and Government Code Section 34886. The City Council subsequently held five public hearings to solicit feedback and review City Council district maps submitted by the public. On July 16, 2018, the City Council introduced and on July 30, 2018, adopted Ordinance 2018-05, selecting a preferred map and election sequence for the newly created City Council District boundaries (“Districting Ordinance”).

Following the early resignation of a Council Member Warren Kusumoto, Ordinance No. 2020-02 was adopted to amend the Districting Ordinance to provide for the election of three Councilmembers by district in 2020, with two Councilmembers elected by district in 2022.

After the transition to the district-based election system, the City was geographically divided into five separate districts, each represented by one Council Member who was chosen by the electors residing in that particular district.

On May 17, 2021, the City Council approved an agreement with National Demographics Corporation, Inc. for Professional Demographer Services to assist in facilitating City Council District Map revisions.

The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the Fair Maps Act (the “Act”), which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020. The deadline for cities with November elections to adopt the final District Map is April 17, 2022 (205 days before the election). If this deadline is passed, the County Superior Court will adopt the district boundaries for the City.

Under the Act, the Council shall draw and adopt boundaries using the following criteria in the listed order of priority (Elections Code 21601(c) for general law cities / 21621(c) for charter cities):
• Comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act
• Geographically contiguous
• Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together)
• Easily identifiable boundaries
• Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people)
• Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as:
• Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024 • Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office
• Future population growth
Redistricting Public Hearing #4 Continued
March 21, 2022

Page 3 of 7 ends

The City must ensure compliance with the following state and federally-mandated criteria:
• Each district shall contain a nearly equal population. • Each district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act.
• Each district shall not be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny.

After meeting those requirements, the idea of districts is to achieve goals including respect for communities of interest. A community of interest is a neighborhood or group that would benefit from being in the same district because of shared interests, views, or characteristics. Possible community features include, but are not limited to:

A. School attendance areas;
B. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways; C. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks; D. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and E. Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
a. Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation b. Languages spoken at home
c. Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas
Public Hearings
By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps • At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps • The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps • City or county staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the required public redistricting hearings
To increase the accessibility of these hearings, cities and counties must take the following steps:
• At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday
• If a redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing portion must begin at a pre-designated time • Local public redistricting hearings should be made accessible to people with disabilities
Redistricting Public Hearing #4 Continued
March 21, 2022

Page 4 of 7 ends

Notices of the Public Hearings were published in English, Spanish, Korean, and Vietnamese in the local newspaper, posted on the City website, and City Hall posting boards. Videos of the public hearings were posted on the redistricting webpage.

Public Hearing 1 – Tuesday, January 18, 2022 – 5:30 p.m.

This was the first meeting held virtually before the City Council. Dr. Levitt provided the presentation on the redistricting process and this was the first opportunity for the public to provide input. There were no members of the public that wished to participate present and no written public comments were received. Council raised concerns regarding the ability to account for future population growth. A list of known planned and approved developments was provided to NDC for consideration. Concerns regarding the amount of available single-housing units in District 1 were also stated.

Public Hearing 2 – Monday, February 7, 2022 – 5:30 p.m.

This was the second Public Hearing held before the City Council. Dr. Levitt provided the presentation on the redistricting process, and permissible criteria to be considered to evaluate district boundaries. There were no members of the public that wished to participate present and no written public comments were received.

Public Hearing 3 – Monday, February 28, 2022 – 6:30 p.m.

This was the third public hearing held before the City Council. Dr. Levitt provided the presentation on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to evaluate district boundaries. Dr. Levitt reviewed the four maps for consideration, one draft map submitted by the public and three draft maps prepared by NDC.

Frank Marquese stated support for the work the City was doing and Maggie Marquese received clarification regarding Public Map 1 and NDC Map 1. She stated it would be challenging to split up the Apartment Row neighborhood. Shane Smith identified himself as the individual who submitted the public map. He expressed concern the socioeconomic data was not available on the public map drawing tool and supported participating in the process.

Council discussed the inclusion of Lily and Marna in District one, requested across the street neighbors be in the same district if population balance would allow for it, concern for the lack of single family homes in District 1, ensured new developments were taken into consideration, and stated a preference for not moving residents to a district that would prolong their ability to vote.

Public Hearing 4 – Monday, March 7, 2022 – 6:00 p.m.

This was the fourth public hearing held before the City Council. Dr. Levitt reviewed and discussed the draft maps of proposed districts had been submitted by members of the community and by the City’s consultant National Demographics Corporation (NDC).

City Council, Staff, and members of the public discussed the following:

Redistricting Public Hearing #4 Continued
March 21, 2022

Page 5 of 7 ends

• Strong desire to stay close to original map in order to avoid confusion for residents.
• Try to avoid shifting residents into new districts that may delay their ability to vote in an upcoming election.
• To the extent possible, ensure that neighborhoods stay together. • Attempt to allow residents on the same block or across the street from each other to remain within the same district (where possible).
• Try to create symmetrical shaped districts boundaries that follow straight lines (where possible) that are easy for residents to identify. • Ensure district boundaries include different housing types (single family homes, Townhomes, Condo, Apartments).

The City Council directed Dr. Levitt to revise Map 2 based on the comments received and continued the Public Hearing to March 21, 2022, at 7:00 p.m.

Channels of Outreach
The City of Los Alamitos leveraged a full array of outreach platforms to connect with the public. These included:
• The creation of the redistricting page on the City’s website, https://calosalamitos.civicplus.com/445/2022-Redistricting. The webpage contains all notices, flyers, Staff reports, presentations, and meeting recordings. Per the Elections Code the website must be maintained for ten years. • Social Media posts spread across Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor.com. o 1/10/22 – Introduction of the process and notice of first Public Hearing o 1/18/22 – Reminder to join the first Public Hearing
o 1/27/22 – Requesting input for maps and notice of second Public Hearing o 2/7/22 – Notice of Public Hearing available on the City’s website o 2/14/22 – Notice Redistricting Map Tools available Online and third Public Hearing
o 2/21/22 – Notice of Map Drafts available online and third Public Hearing o 3/3/22 – Notice of Final Map selection and fourth Public Hearing o 3/7/22 – Reminder of fourth Public Hearing
o 3/10/22 – Notice of Public Hearing 4 continuation to March 21, 2022 o 3/15/22 – Notice of Map Drafts available online and continuation of fourth Public Hearing
• Pubic Hearing Notices in English, Spanish, Korean, and Vietnamese were published in the News Enterprise on January 12 and February 2, 2022. Including the Notice for Public Hearing 4 Continuation published on March 16, 2022. • Email outreach to 10,105 subscribers via the City’s Weekly Newsletter to drive awareness of the redistricting effort and opportunities to participate in Public Hearings
Redistricting Public Hearing #4 Continued
March 21, 2022

Page 6 of 7 ends

• Four Public Hearings, which included one (1) virtual meeting, to discuss the redistricting process and gather public input on neighborhoods and communities of interest
Redistricting Website
The redistricting webpage, http://cityoflosalamitos.org/445/2022-Redistricting, was created to provide extensive resources to the public where they could learn about the redistricting process, access all the materials and meeting information, and draw maps based upon their understanding of communities of interest and submit them for consideration.

DISCUSSION
Public Hearing 4 was continued from March 7, 2022. The purpose of this fourth public hearing is to review and discuss draft maps of proposed districts that have been submitted by members of the community and by the City’s consultant National Demographics Corporation (NDC). The City Council will be requested to select a preferred map. Direction regarding the final map should not be given prior to opening Public Hearing #4. An Ordinance to adopt the preferred district will be introduced.

Draft Maps
Maps must be population-balanced to be considered for potential adoption. Resident submitted maps and draft maps were posted on the City’s website on March 3, 2022.

Notice advising draft maps were available was posted on the City’s Facebook and Nextdoor.com page.

The public submitted one map. NDC originally created three district sequencing scenarios for consideration by the City Council. Based off Council comments NDC prepared a fourth map from February 28, 2022, and a fifth map from March 7, 2022 for consideration.

Dr. Levitt examined the request to have across the street neighbors in the same district.

Due to the dense population in the Apartment Row neighborhood, it was not feasible to do so. Dr. Levitt of NDC will lead a review of the maps and answer questions.

Next Steps
Tonight the City Council will continue Public Hearing #4, select its preferred map, and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-01. Following tonight’s Public Hearing, the final map and Ordinance will be adopted at an Adjourned Regular Council meeting on April 11, 2022.

The deadline to adopt a new map is April 17, 2022.

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Election Expense Account, 10.511.5233.

Redistricting Public Hearing #4 Continued
March 21, 2022

Page 7 of 7 ends

Submitted by: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Ordinance No 2022-01

2. Proposed Draft Maps

3. Neighborhood Maps

4. January 18, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

5. February 7, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

6. February 28, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

7. March 7, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

8. Ordinance No. 2018-05 – Establishing District Sequencing

9. Ordinance No. 2020-02 – Changing District Sequencing ORDINANCE NO. 2022-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING
DISTRICT MAPS FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS BYDISTRICT ELECTIONS WHEREAS, on July 30, 2018, the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos adopted Ordinance No. 2018-05 establishing a district-based election system for City Councilmembers and selecting a voting district map for five (5) Council Districts; and, WHEREAS, Elections Code § 21601 requires that following each decennial federal census, and using that census as a basis, the City Council shall, by ordinance or resolution, adjust the boundaries of any or all of the Council Districts so that the districts shall be as nearly equal in population as may be and shall comply with the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, and the state and federal Voting Rights Acts; and,
WHEREAS, Public Hearings were held on January 18, 2022 and February 7, 2022, to receive public input regarding the composition of the City’s Council Districts before any updated draft voting district maps were drawn; and,
WHEREAS, Public Hearings were then held on February 28, 2022 and March 7, 2022, where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft voting district maps; and,
WHEREAS, on March 217, 2022, the City Council held a final public hearing on the proposal to adjust Council District boundaries, reviewed additional public input, formally selected the voting district map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein, and as set forth in this Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, this Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Elections Code §§ 21600 - 21609 to provide for election of members of the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos by-district in five (5) single-member districts to implement the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (Elections Code§ 14025, et seq.) and protect the guarantees of the California Constitution.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The voting district map attached hereto as Exhibit A shall be and is hereby adopted and determined to constitute the five (5) Council Districts in the City of Los Alamitos, California.

Attachment 1

CC ORD 2022-01

Page 2 of 4 ends

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is authorized to make technical adjustments to the Council District boundaries that do not substantively affect the populations in the districts, the eligibility of candidates, or the residence of elected officials within any district. The City Clerk must consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any technical adjustments deemed necessary and advise the City Council of any such adjustments required in the implementation of the districts.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of the adoption and shall post a Certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of March, 2022.

Shelley Hasselbrink, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney

CC ORD 2022-01

Page 3 of 4 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS )
I, Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-xx was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular special meeting of the City Council on the 217stth day of March, 2022 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council on 121thst day of AprilMarch, 2022, by the following roll-call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________
Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

CC ORD 2022-01

Page 4 of 4 ends

Exhibit A
Council District Map
3 5
1 2
4 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Tarawa Dr
Bunker Hill Dr
Ranger Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
Midway D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lex ni gton Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Maple St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
Public Map 1
Map layers
Public Map 1
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
Attachment 2
Public Map 1
District 1
Total Pop 2,375
Deviation from ideal 16
% Deviation 0.68%
% Hisp 29.9%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,716
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 40%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 1,371
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 53%
% NH Black 11%
Total 1,150
% Latino est. 24%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black 11%
Total 746
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 56%
% NH Black est. 11%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,363
age0-19 23%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 75%
english 70%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 41%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 60%
multi-family 40%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

4.28%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
02/20/2022 23:49 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 1
4 2
5 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
Midway D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lex ni gton Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Maple St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Colgate Dr
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 1
Map layers
NDC Map 1
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
NDC Map 1
District 1
Total Pop 2,325
Deviation from ideal -34
% Deviation -1.44%
% Hisp 30.7%
% NH White 38%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,604
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 41%
% NH Black 12%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 1,328
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 51%
% NH Black 12%
Total 1,107
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black 12%
Total 719
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black est. 13%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,251
age0-19 24%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 76%
english 71%
spanish 18%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 11%
Child in Household child-under18 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

5.60%
28%
48%
3%
17%
1,788
31%
54%
3%
10%
1,577
20%
19%
5%
2%
71%
3%
1,361
19%
18%
5%
2%
73%
3%
924
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
3%
2,440
24%
54%
21%
13%
68%
79%
12%
5%
4%
4%
38%
29%
12%
39%
65%
12%
20%
14%
40%
14%
65%
35%
53%
47%
5 2,386
27 1.14%
19%
59%
2%
15%
1,791
13%
77%
3%
6%
1,753
12%
12%
7%
1%
77%
3%
1,581
12%
11%
7%
1%
78%
3%
1,219
9%
9%
6%
1%
81%
3%
2,408
23%
50%
27%
9%
74%
93%
2%
5%
1%
3%
42%
34%
16%
40%
59%
5%
10%
10%
45%
30%
91%
9%
19%
81%
Total
11,794
198

8.39%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
02/20/2022 23:56 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 5
1 2
4 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Tarawa Dr
Bunker Hill Dr
Ranger Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
M di way D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Map el St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 2
Map layers
NDC Map 2
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
NDC Map 2
District 1
Total Pop 2,375
Deviation from ideal 16
% Deviation 0.68%
% Hisp 29.9%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,716
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 40%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 1,371
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 53%
% NH Black 11%
Total 1,150
% Latino est. 24%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black 11%
Total 746
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 56%
% NH Black est. 11%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,363
age0-19 23%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 75%
english 70%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 41%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 60%
multi-family 40%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Latino voter registration and turnout data are Spanish-surname counts adjusted using Census Population Department undercount estimates. NH White and NH Black registration and turnout counts estimated by NDC. Citizen Voting Age Pop., Age, Immigration, and other demographics from the 2015-2019 American Community Survey and Special Tabulation 5-year data.
2 2,377
18 0.76%
24%
44%
4%
25%
1,656
18%
50%
7%
23%
1,484
16%
14%
11%
2%
66%
6%
1,302
15%
14%
11%
2%
67%
6%
959
12%
11%
9%
1%
73%
6%
2,306
24%
56%
20%
19%
69%
74%
10%
12%
3%
6%
30%
37%
15%
38%
68%
11%
16%
15%
39%
19%
57%
43%
61%
39%
3 2,324
-35
-1.48%
29%
40%
5%
21%
1,590
22%
47%
11%
19%
1,105
26%
24%
9%
1%
53%
12%
889
26%
24%
7%
2%
54%
12%
592
26%
24%
5%
1%
56%
12%
2,301
27%
56%
17%
19%
63%
70%
11%
17%
2%
8%
35%
27%
18%
37%
66%
15%
19%
17%
45%
5%
22%
78%
91%
9%
4 2,395
36 1.53%
25%
51%
2%
18%
1,747
25%
60%
2%
10%
1,589
17%
16%
6%
1%
74%
2%
1,382
16%
15%
6%
1%
75%
2%
955
13%
13%
5%
2%
77%
2%
2,276
22%
54%
24%
12%
70%
81%
9%
5%
5%
3%
38%
29%
15%
31%
64%
11%
16%
13%
44%
16%
74%
26%
44%
56%
5 2,323
-36
-1.53%
21%
58%
2%
15%
1,647
14%
76%
5%
6%
1,663
13%
12%
6%
1%
75%
5%
1,487
12%
11%
7%
1%
76%
4%
1,181
9%
9%
5%
1%
79%
5%
2,238
25%
47%
28%
10%
72%
92%
3%
5%
1%
4%
43%
33%
17%
39%
57%
7%
12%
11%
44%
26%
84%
16%
23%
77%
Total
11,794
72 3.05%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
02/21/2022 0:07 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 1
4 2
5 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
M di way D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Map el St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 3
Map layers
NDC Map 3
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
NDC Map 3
District 1
Total Pop 2,325
Deviation from ideal -34
% Deviation -1.44%
% Hisp 30.7%
% NH White 38%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,604
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 41%
% NH Black 12%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 1,328
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 51%
% NH Black 12%
Total 1,107
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black 12%
Total 719
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black est. 13%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,251
age0-19 24%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 76%
english 71%
spanish 18%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 11%
Child in Household child-under18 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

5.55%
29%
47%
3%
16%
1,778
31%
53%
3%
10%
1,590
20%
19%
5%
1%
71%
3%
1,373
18%
17%
5%
1%
73%
3%
924
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
3%
2,438
24%
54%
21%
13%
68%
79%
12%
5%
4%
4%
38%
29%
12%
39%
65%
12%
20%
14%
40%
14%
65%
35%
53%
47%
5 2,390
31 1.31%
19%
60%
1%
16%
1,811
12%
78%
4%
6%
1,754
12%
11%
7%
1%
77%
3%
1,587
12%
11%
7%
1%
77%
3%
1,218
9%
8%
5%
1%
81%
3%
2,397
23%
49%
27%
9%
74%
92%
1%
5%
1%
3%
41%
34%
17%
37%
59%
6%
10%
10%
46%
29%
91%
9%
20%
80%
Total
11,794
224

9.50%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
02/21/2022 0:39 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 1
4 2
5 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
M di way D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Map el St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Colgate Dr
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 4
Map layers
NDC Map 4
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
NDC Map 4
District 1
Total Pop 2,415
Deviation from ideal 56
% Deviation 2.37%
% Hisp 31.1%
% NH White 36%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,704
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 11%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 16%
Total 1,403
% Latino est. 28%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 50%
% NH Black 12%
Total 1,166
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 24%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black 12%
Total 766
% Latino est. 24%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black est. 13%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,390
age0-19 24%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 21%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 74%
english 69%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 22%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 42%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 56%
multi-family 44%
rented 67%
owned 33%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

8.22%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
03/02/2022 12:56 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 1
4 2
5 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
M di way D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Map el St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Colgate Dr
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 5
Map layers
NDC Map 5
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
NDC Map 5
District 1
Total Pop 2,325
Deviation from ideal -34
% Deviation -1.44%
% Hisp 30.7%
% NH White 38%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,604
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 41%
% NH Black 12%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 1,328
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 51%
% NH Black 12%
Total 1,107
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black 12%
Total 719
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black est. 13%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,251
age0-19 24%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 76%
english 71%
spanish 18%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 11%
Child in Household child-under18 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

5.55%
29%
47%
3%
16%
1,778
31%
53%
3%
10%
1,590
20%
19%
5%
1%
71%
3%
1,373
18%
17%
5%
1%
73%
3%
924
16%
15%
5%
2%
75%
3%
2,438
24%
54%
21%
13%
68%
79%
12%
5%
4%
4%
38%
29%
12%
39%
65%
12%
20%
14%
40%
14%
65%
35%
53%
47%
5 2,281
-78
-3.31%
21%
55%
2%
16%
1,747
14%
70%
6%
9%
1,563
13%
12%
7%
1%
74%
5%
1,412
13%
12%
7%
1%
75%
5%
1,038
10%
10%
5%
1%
79%
5%
2,328
24%
52%
24%
11%
69%
86%
3%
9%
2%
4%
39%
32%
18%
37%
62%
9%
11%
11%
46%
22%
71%
29%
42%
58%
Total
11,794
209

8.86%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
03/13/2022 21:50 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 1
4 2
5 1 2 3 4 5
Arbor Park
Little
Laurel Park
McAuliffe
Middle
School
Los Alamitos
Elementary
Los Alamitos
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Valley Forge Ave
R
e
a
g
a
n
S
t
S
t
Bunker Hill Dr
sarge Ave
Tripoli Ave
Humb
o
l
t
S
t
A
i
c
o
n
d
e
r
o
g
a Dr
S
a
r
a
t
o
g
a
D
r
L
a
n
gl
e
y Dr
M
i
d
w
a
y
D
Es
r
s
e
x
D
r
Thor Ave
Sausalito St
Liberty Ave
s
t
n
u
t
S
t
Kyl
e
S
t
Toland Cir
Yorktown Ave
Winners
Cir
Ave
alina St
Cll Lee
B
a
r
b
i
K
y
l
o
r
S
t
Vi
a
e
l
M
e
r
do
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
arrisburg Rd
Iwo Jima Ct
Vis de
Kin
gs
S
t
Lo
s Al
a
m
i
t
o
s Blv
d
M
a
p
l
e
S
t
r Dr
Santa Clara St
City of Los Alamitos
Election Sequence:

DISTRICTS
2020: 1,2,3
2022: 4,5
©2016 CALIPER
National Demographics
Corporation, June 10, 2018

MAP LAYERS
Green
Census Block
Landmark Area
Water Area
River
Streets
Landmark Point
A
B
C
D
E
F
G H
I
K L
M
N
O
P
E Kinm unt St
o
B
l
o
o
m
fi
e
d
l
Av
e
Ball Rd
Toland Ave
Larwin Ave
Fenley Dr
Myra Ave
Los Alamitos
High School
Cerritos ve
Sa J n oaquin Ave
L
e
x
i
n
g
t
o
n
D
r
Marna Ave
Lilly Ave
Oak
S
t
School
Oak Middle
Ch
e
Serpentine Dr
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
Cat
Unified
a
Hedwig Rd
Katella Ave
Katella Ave
Farquhar Ave
R
a
n
g
e
Tarawa Dr
Antietam Ave
Kear
c
a
Cottonwood
Park
L
i
n
d
a
W
a
y
L
n
H
Orangewood Ave
la Colmena Way
Ora
Blv
d
Al
a
m
ito
s
L
o
s
Pine
Cherry St
South
Highlands
Park
T
Orangewood
S
ate
l
l
ite D
r
Olympic Dr
L
u
n
a
r
D
r
Rainier Cir
I
n
ter
i
o
r
C
i
J
Rossmoor Way
City of Los Alamitos
City of Long Beach
City of Cypress
City of Cypress
City of Seal Beach
City of Los Alamitos
City of Garden Grove
Los Angeles County
605

LOCATION

OF RESIDENTIAL

NEIGHBORHOODS
City of Los Alamitos

ORANGE COUNTY - CALIFORNIA
City Boundary
Country Square
College Park North
Greenbook
Woodcrest
Old Town West
Old Town East
Old Dutch Haven
Suburbia
Highlands
Parkewood
Apartment Row
Carrier Row
New Dutch Haven
Royal Oak Park
El Dorado Park
Estates East
Bungalows
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
LEGEND
Attachment 3
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: January 18, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 3A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Redrawing of Election District Boundaries

SUMMARY
Every ten years, cities with by-district election systems must use new census data to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed.

This process, called redistricting, ensures all districts have nearly equal population. The redistricting process for the City of Los Alamitos must be completed by April 17, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Receive a report from Staff on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries.

BACKGROUND
The City adopted its current district boundaries on July 30, 2018, based on 2010 census data as required by law. The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020.

Page 2 of 3 ends

• Easily identifiable boundaries
• Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people)
• Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as:
• Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024 • Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office
• Future population growth
By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps • At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps • The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps • City or county staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the required public redistricting hearings
To increase the accessibility of these hearings, cities and counties must take the following steps:
• At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday
• If a redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing portion must begin at a pre-designated time • Local public redistricting hearings should be made accessible to people with disabilities

DISCUSSION
The purpose of this public hearing is to inform the public about the districting process and to hear from the community on what factors should be taken into consideration while creating district boundaries. The public is requested to provide input regarding communities of interest and other local factors that should be considered while drafting district maps.

A community of interest under the relevant Elections Code for cities (Section 21601(c) / 21621(c)) is “a population that shares common social or economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” Redistricting Public Hearing #1
January 18, 2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

Possible features defining community of interest might include, but are not limited to:
• School attendance areas;
• Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways; • Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks;
• Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and • Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
• Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation; • Languages spoken at home; and
• Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas.

Next Steps
On February 7, 2022, the City Council will conduct Public Hearing #2 at a Special meeting to seek additional public input and provide direction on criteria to be considered while drafting district maps. Following that hearing, draft district maps and proposed election sequencing will be posted to the City website and available at City Hall.

Below is the proposed schedule for the Redistricting Process:

Public Hearing 1: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 – 5:30 p.m. (Regular Council Meeting) Public Hearing 2: Monday, February 7, 2022 – 5:30 p.m. (Special Council Meeting) Public Hearing 3: Monday, February 28, 2022 – 6:30 p.m. (Regular Council Meeting) Public Hearing 4: Monday, March 7, 2022 – 6:00 p.m. (Special Council meeting) Adopt District Maps: Monday, March 21, 2022 – 6:00 p.m. (Regular Council Meeting)

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Election Expense Account, 10.511.5233.

Submitted by: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Craig Koehler, Finance Director Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
City of Los Alamitos
Introduction to Redistricting
Dr. Justin Levitt, Vice President
National Demographics Corporation Jan 18, 2022
2 Redistricting – Why Now?
 Los Alamitos moved to districts in 2018 and used
districts for first time in 2020
 Redistricting is required when the decennial Census
data is released, once every ten years
 Delays in receiving the Census data have delayed states, counties, cities, and other jurisdictions throughout
California and the US
 New laws like the Fair Maps Act have changed how
districts are drawn and how the process is conducted
Jan 18, 2022
3 Redistricting Process & Schedule
Step Description
Two Initial Hearings
1/18 & 2/7
Held prior to release of draft maps.

Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Deadline for Submission
2/21/22
Deadline for maps available for discussion at the February 28th Hearing
Two Draft Map Hearings
2/28 & 3/7
Two Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps Deadline for Submission
3/11/2022
Deadline for maps available for discussion at the March 21st Hearing Final Adoption
3/21/2022
Final selection and adoption of a map at a regular Council meeting Map Adoption
By April 17, 2022
Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption.

Map adopted via ordinance or resolution.

Jan 18, 2022
4 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of existing
districts

1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for
Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods
and “communities of
interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable
boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of
people to get to a more distant
group of people)
Prohibited: “Shall not favor or
discriminate against a political party.”

3. Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
Redistricting Rules and Goals
Jan 18, 2022
5 Defining Neighborhoods
1st Question: What is your neighborhood?
2nd Question: What are its geographic boundaries?
Examples of physical features defining a neighborhood boundary:
 Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highway or major roads, rivers, canals and/or hills
 Areas around parks or schools
 Other neighborhood landmarks
In the absence of public testimony, planning records and other similar documents may provide definition.

Jan 18, 2022
6 Beyond Neighborhoods:

Defining Communities of Interest
1st Question: What defines your community?
 Geographic Area, plus
 Shared issue or characteristic
 Shared social or economic interest
 Impacted by county policies
 Tell us “your community’s story”
2nd Question: Would this community benefit from being “included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation”?  Or would it benefit more from having multiple representatives? Definitions of Communities of Interest may not include relationships with political parties, incumbents, or political candidates.

Jan 18, 2022
7 Current Districts
Total Deviation = 21.5%
Jan 18, 2022
8 Demographic Summary of Existing Districts
Estimates using official 2020 State-Adjusted Census Data Each of the 5 districts must contain about 2,359 people.

Jan 18, 2022
District 1 2 3 4 5 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adj) 2,325 2,237 2,744 2,250 2,238 11,794 Deviation from ideal -34 -122 385 -109 -121 507
% Deviation -1.43% -5.16% 16.33% -4.61% -5.12% 21.49%
% Hisp 31% 21% 26% 28% 22% 26%
% NH White 38% 45% 46% 49% 55% 46%
% NH Black 5% 3% 4% 3% 2% 4%
% Asian-American 22% 28% 19% 17% 16% 20%
Total 1,604 1,575 1,846 1,617 1,715 8,356
% Hisp 33% 12% 21% 31% 15% 22%
% NH White 41% 53% 53% 54% 71% 55%
% NH Black 12% 8% 6% 3% 7% 7%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12% 25% 19% 10% 7% 15%
2020 Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
9 Latino CVAP
Jan 18, 2022
Latins are concentrated in Old Town West, particularly west of Los Alamitos Blvd. 10 Asian CVAP
Jan 18, 2022
Asian neighborhoods are found particularly in the northern portion of the city, particularly north of Cerritos Ave and east of Los Alamitos Blvd.
11 Apartments & Multifamily Housing
Jan 18, 2022
Other socio-economic measures are available
12 Income over $75k
Jan 18, 2022
Other socio-economic measures are available
13 Neighborhood Map
Jan 18, 2022
14 Public Mapping and Map Review Tools
 Different tools for different purposes
 Different tools for different levels of technical skill and interest  Simple “review draft maps” tool
 Easy-to-use “Draw your neighborhood” tool
 Paper- and Excel-based simple “Draw a draft map” tools  Powerful, data-rich “Draw a draft map” tool
Whether you use the powerful (but complicated) online mapping tool, Excel, the paper kit, or just draw on a napkin, we welcome your maps! Jan 18, 2022
15 Simple Map Drawing Tool
Paper “Public Participation Kit”
 For those without internet access or who prefer paper  Total Population Counts only – no demographic numbers Jan 18, 2022
16 Dave’s Redistricting App (DRA)
“Draw Your Community of Interest” focus
 Also includes simple district-mapping tool
 Only available in English
 Email a link to your map to the City and publish or share Jan 18, 2022
17 Caliper’s “Maptitude Online Redistricting”
Full Database, Powerful Online Mapping Tool
 Powerful, common, data-rich online tool
 Six language options: English, Spanish, Portuguese, Vietnamese, Mandarin and Korean
 Quick Start Guide
Jan 18, 2022
18 Hearing & Discussion
What is your neighborhood and what are its boundaries?
What other notable areas are in the City, and what are
their boundaries?
Any questions about the mapping tools?
Jan 18, 2022
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 7, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 3A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing #2 to Receive Input from the Community Regarding the Redrawing of Election District Boundaries

SUMMARY
Every ten years, cities with by-district election systems must use new census data to review and, if needed, redraw district lines to reflect how local populations have changed.

This process, called redistricting, ensures all districts have nearly equal population. The redistricting process for the City of Los Alamitos must be completed by April 17, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Conduct a public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Receive a report from Staff on the redistricting process and permissible criteria to be considered to redraw district boundaries.

Page 2 of 3 ends

Page 3 of 3 ends

Next Steps
Following tonight’s hearing, draft district maps and proposed election sequencing will be posted to the City website and available at City Hall.

Below is the proposed schedule for the Redistricting Process:

Public Hearing 3: Monday, February 28, 2022 – 6:30 p.m. (Regular Council Meeting) Public Hearing 4: Monday, March 7, 2022 – 6:00 p.m. (Special Council meeting) Adopt District Maps: Monday, March 21, 2022 – 6:00 p.m. (Regular Council Meeting)

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Election Expense Account, 10.511.5233.

Submitted by: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
City of Los Alamitos
Introduction to Redistricting
Dr. Justin Levitt, Vice President
National Demographics Corporation
Feb 7, 2022
2 Redistricting – Why Now?
 Los Alamitos moved to districts in 2018 and used
districts for first time in 2020
 Redistricting is required when the decennial Census
data is released, once every ten years
 Delays in receiving the Census data have delayed states, counties, cities, and other jurisdictions throughout
California and the US
 New laws like the Fair Maps Act have changed how
districts are drawn and how the process is conducted
Feb 7, 2022
3 Redistricting Process & Schedule
Step Description
Two Initial Hearings
1/18 & 2/7
Held prior to release of draft maps.

Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Map adopted via ordinance or resolution.

Feb 7, 2022
4 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of existing
districts

1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for
Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods
and “communities of
interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable
boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of
people to get to a more distant
group of people)
Prohibited: “Shall not favor or
discriminate against a political party.”

3. Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
Redistricting Rules and Goals
Feb 7, 2022
5 Defining Neighborhoods
1st Question: What is your neighborhood?
2nd Question: What are its geographic boundaries?
Examples of physical features defining a neighborhood boundary:
 Natural neighborhood dividing lines, such as highway or major roads, rivers, canals and/or hills
 Areas around parks or schools
 Other neighborhood landmarks
In the absence of public testimony, planning records and other similar documents may provide definition.

Feb 7, 2022
6 Beyond Neighborhoods:

Feb 7, 2022
7 Current Districts
Total Deviation = 21.5%
Feb 7, 2022
8 Demographic Summary of Existing Districts
Estimates using official 2020 State-Adjusted Census Data Each of the 5 districts must contain about 2,359 people.

Feb 7, 2022
District 1 2 3 4 5 Total
2020 2020 Census (Adj) 2,325 2,237 2,744 2,250 2,238 11,794 Deviation from ideal -34 -122 385 -109 -121 507
% Deviation -1.43% -5.16% 16.33% -4.61% -5.12% 21.49%
% Hisp 31% 21% 26% 28% 22% 26%
% NH White 38% 45% 46% 49% 55% 46%
% NH Black 5% 3% 4% 3% 2% 4%
% Asian-American 22% 28% 19% 17% 16% 20%
Total 1,604 1,575 1,846 1,617 1,715 8,356
% Hisp 33% 12% 21% 31% 15% 22%
% NH White 41% 53% 53% 54% 71% 55%
% NH Black 12% 8% 6% 3% 7% 7%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12% 25% 19% 10% 7% 15%
2020 Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
9 Latino CVAP
Feb 7, 2022
Latins are concentrated in Old Town West, particularly west of Los Alamitos Blvd. 10 Asian CVAP
Feb 7, 2022
Asian neighborhoods are found particularly in the northern portion of the city, particularly north of Cerritos Ave and east of Los Alamitos Blvd.
11 Apartments & Multifamily Housing
Feb 7, 2022
Other socio-economic measures are available
12 Income over $75k
Feb 7, 2022
Other socio-economic measures are available
13 Neighborhood Map
Feb 7, 2022
14 Public Mapping and Map Review Tools
 Different tools for different purposes
 Different tools for different levels of technical skill and interest  Simple “review draft maps” tool
 Easy-to-use “Draw your neighborhood” tool
 Paper- and Excel-based simple “Draw a draft map” tools  Powerful, data-rich “Draw a draft map” tool
Whether you use the powerful (but complicated) online mapping tool, Excel, the paper kit, or just draw on a napkin, we welcome your maps! Feb 7, 2022
15 Simple Map Drawing Tool
Paper “Public Participation Kit”
 For those without internet access or who prefer paper  Total Population Counts only – no demographic numbers Feb 7, 2022
16 Dave’s Redistricting App (DRA)
“Draw Your Community of Interest” focus
 Also includes simple district-mapping tool
 Only available in English
 Email a link to your map to the City and publish or share Feb 7, 2022
17 Caliper’s “Maptitude Online Redistricting”
Full Database, Powerful Online Mapping Tool
 Powerful, common, data-rich online tool
 Six language options: English, Spanish, Portuguese, Vietnamese, Mandarin and Korean
 Quick Start Guide
Feb 7, 2022
18 Hearing & Discussion
What is your neighborhood and what are its boundaries?
What other notable areas are in the City, and what are
their boundaries?
Any questions about the mapping tools?
Feb 7, 2022
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: February 28, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 9A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing #3 to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries

SUMMARY
Pursuant to Election Code section 21601, cities with by-district election systems are required to redraw their district boundary maps to ensure compliance with the California and federal Voting Rights Acts. The process to complete the redistricting requires a minimum of four public hearings and dedicated public outreach to ensure minority populations and communities of interest are aware of the redistricting effort and are provided with options to participate. The deadline for cities to complete the redistricting process is April 17, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Open the public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Review draft maps to redraw district boundaries and provide input to Staff.

BACKGROUND
On May 11, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-08 declaring its intent to initiate proceedings to transition the City from at-large to district-based Council Member elections pursuant to Elections Code Section 10010 and Government Code Section 34886. The City Council subsequently held five public hearings to solicit feedback and review City Council district maps submitted by the public. On July 16, 2018, the City Council introduced and on July 30, 2018, adopted Ordinance 2018-05, with the Green for the newly created City Council District boundaries.

Following the early resignation of a Council Member, Ordinance No. 2020-02 was adopted to amend the Districting Ordinance to provide for the election of three Councilmembers by district in 2020, with two Councilmembers elected by district in 2022.

Attachment 6
Redistricting Public Hearing #3
February 28, 2022

Page 2 of 5 ends

After the transition to the district-based election system, the city was geographically divided into five separate districts, each represented by one Council Member who was chosen by the electors residing in that particular district.

The districts must now be redrawn using the 2020 census data and in compliance with the FAIR MAPS Act, which was adopted by the California legislature as AB 849 and took effect January 1, 2020. The deadline for cities with November elections to adopt the final District Map is April 17, 2022 (205 days before the election). If this deadline is passed, the County Superior Court will adopt the district boundaries for the city.

Under the Act, the Council shall draw and adopt boundaries using the following criteria in the listed order of priority (Elections Code 21601(c) for general law cities / 21621(c) for charter cities):
• Comply with the federal requirements of equal population and the Voting Rights Act
• Geographically contiguous
• Undivided neighborhoods and “communities of interest” (socio-economic geographic areas that should be kept together)
• Easily identifiable boundaries
• Compact (do not bypass one group of people to get to a more distant group of people)
• Shall not favor or discriminate against a political party Once the prioritized criteria are met, other traditional districting principles can be considered, such as:
• Minimize the number of voters delayed from voting in 2022 to 2024 • Respect voters’ choices / continuity in office
• Future population growth
The City must ensure compliance with the following state and federally-mandated criteria:
• Each district shall contain a nearly equal population. • Each district shall be drawn in a manner that complies with the Federal Voting Rights Act.
• Each district shall not be drawn with race as the predominate factor in violation of the principles established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), and its progeny.

Redistricting Public Hearing #3
February 28, 2022

Page 3 of 5 ends

A. School attendance areas;
B. Natural dividing lines such as major roads, hills, or highways; C. Areas around parks and other neighborhood landmarks; D. Common issues, neighborhood activities, or legislative/election concerns; and E. Shared demographic characteristics, such as:
a. Similar levels of income, education, or linguistic insolation b. Languages spoken at home
c. Single-family and multi-family housing unit areas
Public Hearings
By law, the City must hold at least four public hearings that enable community members to provide input on the drawing of district maps:
• At least one hearing must occur before the city or county draws draft maps • At least two hearings must happen after the drawing of draft maps • The fourth hearing can happen either before or after the drawing of draft maps • City or county staff or consultants may hold a public workshop instead of one of the required public redistricting hearings
To increase the accessibility of these hearings, cities and counties must take the following steps:
• At least one hearing must occur on a Saturday, Sunday, or after 6 p.m. on a weekday
• If a redistricting hearing is consolidated with another local government meeting, the redistricting hearing portion must begin at a pre-designated time • Local public redistricting hearings should be made accessible to people with disabilities
On January 18, 2022, and February 7, 2022, the City Council held the first and second of its four required public hearings in the redistricting process, taking input from the public and providing feedback to NDC. This is the third of the four public hearings required by the FAIR MAPS Act.

The fourth public hearing is scheduled for a Special City Council meeting of March 7, 2022 at 6:00 p.m., at which time the City Council is expected to identify and introduce an ordinance to adopt its preferred map. That ordinance would then be adopted at the City Council’s Regular meeting to be held on March 21, 2022.

Redistricting Public Hearing #3
February 28, 2022

Page 4 of 5 ends

Community Outreach
The City has engaged in outreach efforts to inform the public about the process to redraw the district elections lines. The Public Hearing Notice for the hearings was published in English, Spanish, Korean, and Vietnamese in the News Enterprise. The notices were posted on the City’s website, on the posting board at City Hall, and posted to the City’s social media outlets including Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor.com.

The City’s website, https://ca-losalamitos.civicplus.com/445/2022-Redistricting, contains all notices, flyers, Staff reports, presentations, and meeting recordings. Before each public hearing an additional notice is published to the City’s Social Media sites. The information has also been included in the City’s Weekly newsletter.

DISCUSSION
The purpose of this third public hearing is to review and discuss draft maps of proposed districts that have been submitted by members of the community and by the City’s consultant National Demographics Corporation (NDC). This hearing transitions from the earlier hearings’ purpose of informing the public about the districting process and hearing from the community on what factors should be taken into consideration while creating district boundaries, to a new focus on the specific boundary lines of the draft maps.

Draft Maps
Maps must be population-balanced to be considered for potential adoption. Resident submitted maps and draft maps were posted on the City’s website on February 21, 2022.

Notice advising draft maps were available was posted on the City’s Facebook and Nextdoor.com page and sent to the local papers.

The public submitted one map. NDC has created three district sequencing scenarios for review by the City Council and the public. A representative from NDC will lead a review of the draft maps and answer questions. Part of this process will include looking at different scenarios and various ways to divide the districts.

Based on comments received at or in advance of the third Public Hearing, NDC will refine the proposed maps for final consideration during the fourth Public Hearing on March 7, 2022.

Received Comments
At the January 18, 2022 Public Hearing, Council raised concerns regarding the ability to account for future population growth. A list of known planned and approved developments has been provided to NDC for consideration.

At the same Hearing, concerns were stated regarding the amount of available singlehousing units in District 1.

No comments were received at Public Hearing #2.

Redistricting Public Hearing #3
February 28, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

Next Steps
Tonight the City Council will conduct Public Hearing #3 to seek public input and provide direction on the redrawn draft district maps. Topics for discussion can include:
• How well do the draft maps comply with the Fair Maps Act? • What do you like about (parts of) each map? What works in each option? • Council may eliminate maps, request additional maps or tests, and provide additional direction to the demographer
Following tonight’s Public Hearing, the initial draft maps and any possible new or revised maps will be discussed at the Public Hearing #4 on March 7, 2022.

On March 7, 2022, Public Hearing #4, the City Council will be requested to select a preferred map. Direction regarding the final map should not be given prior to opening Public Hearing #4. An Ordinance to adopt the preferred district will be introduced.

Adoption of the Ordinance is scheduled to occur on March 21, 2022, and the City Clerk and demographer will then work with the County Elections Division to have the district maps integrated into the countywide voting system. This adoption meets the April 17, 2022 deadline and the new district boundaries will be effective for the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election.

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Election Expense Account, 10.511.5233.

Submitted by: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager
Attachment: 1. Current District Map

2. Proposed Draft Maps

3. Neighborhood Maps

4. Public Hearing Notice
3 1
4 2
5 Arbor Park
Little
Cottonwood
Park
Joint Forces Training Base
Laurel Park
South
Highlands
Park
Carbon Crk
Bolsa Ch Fld Cn Chnnl
McAuliffeMiddleSchool
Los AlamitosElementary
Los AlamitosUnified
Los AlamitosHigh School
Oak MiddleSchool
605
Los Alamitos
Chnnl
Coyote Crk
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos Blvd
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution
Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Reagan St
Cherry St
Pine St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Tripoli Ave
Humbolt St
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Ticonderoga Dr
Saratoga Dr
Langley Dr
Midway D
E
r
ssex Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Chestnut St
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Kyle St
Toland Cir
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir Antietam Ave
Orangewood Ave
Toland Ave
Catalina St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kaylor St Linda Way
Via el Mercado
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Iwo Jima Ct
Vis de Ora
Oak St
Myra Ave
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Marna Ave
San Joaquin Ave
Lunar Dr
Kings St
Kinmount St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Maple St
Noel St
Minuteman
Cir
Lilly Ave
Interior Cir
Rainier Cir
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Hedwig Rd
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
National Demographics Corporation, July 11, 2018
City of Los Alamitos2020 Districting
Council-SelectedGreen Mapas amended on 2/18/2020
ElectionSequence:2020: 1, 2, and 32022:
4 and 5
Map layers
Green
Census Block
Landmark Area
Water Area
River
Streets
Landmark Point
©2016 CALIPER
Attachment 1
District 1 2345 Total
Ideal Total Pop 2,298 2,295 2,379 2,205 2,232 11,409
Deviation from ideal 16 13 97 -77 -50 174
% Deviation 0.70% 0.57% 4.25% -3.37% -2.19% 7.62%
% Hisp 31% 14% 24% 19% 17% 21%
% NH White 47% 62% 55% 63% 66% 59%
% NH Black 4% 3% 4% 2% 2% 3%
% Asian-American 14% 19% 15% 13% 11% 14%
Total 1,620 2,044 1,500 1,565 1,635 8,364
% Hisp 28% 9% 19% 27% 15% 19%
% NH White 41% 62% 60% 58% 73% 59%
% NH Black 12% 6% 6% 1% 4% 6%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 13% 19% 14% 9% 8% 13%
Total 1,087 1,281 1,279 1,269 1,403 6,319
% Latino est. 25% 14% 21% 16% 12% 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22% 13% 19% 14% 11% 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 6% 9% 6% 5% 5% 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2%
% NH White est. 53% 67% 65% 70% 78% 67%
% NH Black 12% 6% 6% 1% 4% 6%
Total 824 1,046 1,015 1,037 1,192 5,114
% Latino est. 25% 13% 22% 15% 11% 17%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23% 12% 19% 14% 10% 15%
% Asian-Surnamed 5% 9% 4% 6% 5% 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2%
% NH White est. 53% 68% 65% 71% 79% 68%
% NH Black 12% 6% 6% 1% 4% 5%
Total 374 544 523 553 660 2,655
% Latino est. 21% 8% 12% 12% 9% 12%
% Spanish-Surnamed 19% 7% 11% 11% 8% 10%
% Asian-Surnamed 4% 10% 5% 5% 4% 5%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2% 0% 1% 2% 1% 1%
% NH White est. 71% 81% 79% 76% 86% 79%
% NH Black est. 3% 1% 2% 0% 0% 1%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,429 2,412 2,444 2,200 2,222 11,706 age0-19 24% 27% 31% 29% 29% 28%
age20-60 53% 54% 52% 49% 48% 51%
age60plus 23% 20% 17% 22% 22% 21%
immigrants 16% 18% 15% 12% 11% 15%
naturalized 74% 64% 56% 61% 61% 64%
english 77% 74% 76% 82% 83% 78%
spanish 9% 11% 12% 8% 8% 10%
asian-lang 11% 12% 9% 7% 7% 9%
other lang 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 3%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less
than Very Well" 9% 10% 8% 6% 5% 8%
hs-grad 45% 50% 53% 51% 51% 50%
bachelor 27% 26% 24% 24% 24% 25%
graduatedegree 16% 14% 14% 18% 19% 16%
Child in Household child-under18 28% 33% 40% 35% 34% 34% Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 57% 61% 63% 56% 56% 59%
income 0-25k 13% 13% 14% 12% 12% 13%
income 25-50k 18% 17% 16% 13% 12% 15%
income 50-75k 15% 18% 22% 19% 19% 19%
income 75-200k 43% 44% 42% 46% 47% 44%
income 200k-plus 12% 7% 5% 10% 11% 9%
single family 67% 53% 35% 65% 70% 58%
multi-family 33% 47% 65% 35% 30% 42%
rented 50% 60% 73% 47% 42% 55%
owned 50% 40% 27% 53% 58% 45%
Total population data from the 2010 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

Housing Stats
Household Income
Education (among those
age 25+)
Total Pop
Los Alamitos - Green
Language spoken at home
2,282
Immigration
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Age
Voter Registration (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2016)
Voter Turnout (Nov
2014)
3 1
4 2
5 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Bunker Hill Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
Midway D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lex ni gton Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Maple St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Colgate Dr
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
NDC Map 1
Map layers
NDC Map 1
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
Attachment 2
NDC Map 1
District 1
Total Pop 2,325
Deviation from ideal -34
% Deviation -1.44%
% Hisp 30.7%
% NH White 38%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,604
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 41%
% NH Black 12%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 12%
Total 1,328
% Latino est. 27%
% Spanish-Surnamed 26%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 51%
% NH Black 12%
Total 1,107
% Latino est. 25%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 9%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 52%
% NH Black 12%
Total 719
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black est. 13%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,251
age0-19 24%
age20-60 54%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 76%
english 71%
spanish 18%
asian-lang 10%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 40%
bachelor 32%
graduatedegree 11%
Child in Household child-under18 38%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 66%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 24%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 61%
multi-family 39%
rented 63%
owned 37%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

9.50%
26%
46%
4%
20%
8,356
22%
55%
7%
15%
7,212
19%
18%
8%
2%
65%
7%
6,210
18%
17%
8%
2%
67%
7%
4,433
15%
14%
6%
1%
70%
6%
11,484
24%
54%
22%
16%
69%
77%
10%
10%
3%
5%
37%
31%
15%
37%
64%
11%
17%
14%
43%
15%
60%
40%
57%
43%
02/21/2022 0:39 Page 1 of 1
Total Pop
Citizen Voting Age Pop
Voter Registration
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2020)
Voter Turnout
(Nov 2018)
Age
Immigration
Language spoken at home
Education
(among those age 25+)
Household Income
Housing Stats
3 5
1 2
4 Little Cottonwood Park
Arbor Park
Laurel Park
South Highlands Park
605
605
Tripoli Ave
Shiloh Way
Doolittle Ave
Los Alamitos B vl d
Pso Bonita
Saratoga Ave
Constitution Ave
Howard Ave
Green Ave
Katella Ave Katella Ave
Noel St
Orangewood Ave
Valley Forge Ave
Cherry St
Reagan St
P ni e St
Tarawa Dr
Bunker Hill Dr
Ranger Dr
Kearsarge Ave
Humbolt St
Portal Dr
Ball Rd
Cerritos Ave
Los Vaqueros Cir
Ticonderoga D
S
r
aratoga Dr
Langley Dr
M di way D
E
r
ssex Dr
Enterprise Dr
Thor Ave
Serpentine Dr
Seal Beach Blvd
Sausalito St
Farquhar Ave
Liberty Ave
Bloomfield Ave
Toland Ave
Wasp Ct
Chestnut St
Walnut St
Los Alamitos Blvd
Fenley Dr
Lexington Dr
Rochelle St
Lampson Ave
Kyle St
Antietam Ave
Yorktown Ave
Winners Cir
Orangewood Ave
Catalina St Oak St
Cll Lee
Barbi Ln
Kay ol r St L ni da Way
Via el Mercado
Myra Ave
Olympic Dr
Forrestal Ct
Florista St
Harrisburg Rd
la Colmena Way
Lake Champlain Ct
Vis de Ora
el Dorado Way
del Norte Way
Farnham Ave
Bradbury Rd
Rossmoor Way
Satellite Dr
Kings St
Lassen St
Maple St
Bloomfield Ave
America Dr
Minuteman Cir
Apollo Cir
Interior Cir Carlsbad Cir
Wallingsford Rd
Bryant Ct
Marion Ave
Santa Elise St
Santa Clara St
Larwin Ave
City of Los AlamitosRedistricting 2022
Public Map 1
Map layers
Public Map 1
Streets
Landmark Area
Water Area
Current Districts ©2021 CALIPER
Public Map 1
District 1
Total Pop 2,375
Deviation from ideal 16
% Deviation 0.68%
% Hisp 29.9%
% NH White 39%
% NH Black 5%
% Asian-American 22%
Total 1,716
% Hisp 33%
% NH White 40%
% NH Black 10%
% Asian/Pac.Isl. 15%
Total 1,371
% Latino est. 26%
% Spanish-Surnamed 25%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 3%
% NH White est. 53%
% NH Black 11%
Total 1,150
% Latino est. 24%
% Spanish-Surnamed 23%
% Asian-Surnamed 8%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 54%
% NH Black 11%
Total 746
% Latino est. 23%
% Spanish-Surnamed 22%
% Asian-Surnamed 6%
% Filipino-Surnamed 2%
% NH White est. 56%
% NH Black est. 11%
ACS Pop. Est. Total 2,363
age0-19 23%
age20-60 55%
age60plus 22%
immigrants 18%
naturalized 75%
english 70%
spanish 17%
asian-lang 12%
other lang 2%
Language Fluency Speaks Eng. "Less than Very Well" 6%
hs-grad 41%
bachelor 31%
graduatedegree 12%
Child in Household child-under18 40%
Pct of Pop. Age 16+ employed 65%
income 0-25k 11%
income 25-50k 23%
income 50-75k 16%
income 75-200k 41%
income 200k-plus 8%
single family 60%
multi-family 40%
rented 65%
owned 35%
Total population data from the 2020 Decennial Census.

Surname-based Voter Registration and Turnout data from the California Statewide Database.

NOT TO SCALE
General Plan
FIGURE 1-4
Attachment 3

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Council Chamber
3191 Katella Ave.

Los Alamitos, CA 90720
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that pursuant to California Elections Code Section 21607.1, the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos will hold public hearings at the above location and address to receive input regarding potential redistricting of Council Member districts.

Public Hearing #2
DATE: February 7, 2022
TIME: 5:30 p.m.

Pursuant to California Elections Code Section 21607.1, the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos will hold public hearings at the above address and location to review draft maps, take public input, and consider potential adoption of revised Council Member district boundaries.

Public Hearing #3
DATE: February 28, 2022
TIME: 6:30 p.m.

Public Hearing #4
DATE: March 7, 2022
TIME: 6:00 p.m.

The public is invited to attend and/or submit information regarding their Communities of Interest and proposed division boundaries for the 2022 redistricting process.

For more information visit the City’s website at www.cityoflosalamitos.org or you are invited to contact Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk, at (562) 431-3538, ext. 220 or by email at [email protected]. Written and oral testimony is invited.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, you should contact the office of the City Clerk at (562) 431- 3538, Ext. 220. Notification by noon on the date of the public hearing will enable the City to make arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.

Attachment 4
AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA

CIUDAD DE LOS ALAMITOS
Council Chamber
3191 Katella Ave.

Los Alamitos, CA 90720
POR LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA, que de conformidad con la Sección 21607.1 del Código Electoral de California, el Concejo Municipal de la Ciudad de Los Alamitos celebrará audiencias públicas en la ubicación y dirección anteriores para recibir información sobre la posible redistritación de los distritos de los Miembros del Concejo.

Audiencia Pública #2
FECHA: 7 de febrero de 2022
HORA: 5:30 p.m.

De acuerdo con la Sección 21607.1 del Código electoral de California, el Concejo Municipal de la Ciudad de Los Alamitos llevará a cabo audiencias públicas en la ubicación y dirección anteriores para revisar los borradores de los mapas, recibir aportes del público y considerar la posible adopción de los límites revisados de los distritos de los Miembros del Concejo.

Audiencia Pública #3
FECHA: 28 de febrero de 2022
HORA: 6:30 p.m.

Audiencia Pública #4
FECHA: 7 de marzo de 2022
HORA: 6:00 p.m.

Se invita al público a asistir y/o enviar información sobre sus Comunidades de Interés y los límites de división propuestos para el proceso de redistritación de 2022.

Para obtener más información, visite el sitio web de la Ciudad en www.cityoflosalamitos.org o se le invita a comunicarse con Windmera Quintanar, MMC, Secretaria de la Ciudad, al (562) 431-3538, ext. 220 o por correo electrónico a [email protected]. Se invita el testimonio escrito y oral.

En cumplimiento con la Ley de Estadounidenses con Discapacidades, si necesita asistencia especial para participar en esta reunión, debería comunicarse con la oficina de la Secretaria de la Ciudad al (562) 431-3538, Ext. 220. La notificación antes del mediodía en la fecha de la audiencia pública permitirá a la Ciudad hacer arreglos para garantizar la accesibilidad a esta reunión.

공청회 통지서
LOS ALAMITOS 시
Council Chamber
3191 Katella Ave.

Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Los Alamitos 시의 시의회는 캘리포니아 선거법 제 21607.1 항에 의거하여 상기 장소에서 가능성이 있는 시의회 선거구 경계선 조정에 관한 대중의 의견을 받기 위해 공청회를
주최하는 것을 통지합니다.
제 2 차 공청회
날짜: 2022 년 2 월 7 일
시간: 오후 5:30
Los Alamitos 시의 시의회는 캘리포니아 선거법 제 21607.1 항에 의거하여 상기 장소에서 지도 초고, 대중의 의견, 가능성이 있는 수정된 시의회 선거구 경계선 채택을 고려하는
것에 관한 공청회를 주최하는 것을 통지합니다.
제 3 차 공청회
날짜: 2022 년 2 월 28 일
시간: 오후 6:30
제 4 차 공청회
날짜: 2022 년 3 월 7 일
시간: 오후 6:00
2022 년도 선거구 경계선 조정 과정을 위해 이익 단체 그리고 선거구 경계선 나누기에
관하여 대중이 참석하고 그리고/또는 정보를 제출하도록 초대합니다.
더 많은 정보는 시의 웹사이트인 www.cityoflosalamitos.org 를 방문하거나 시 서기 Windmera Quintanar, MMC 에게 전화 (562) 431-3538, 내선번호 220 로 연락하거나 이메일 [email protected] 로 연락하십시오. 서면 또는 구두 의견도 받습니다.
미국 장애인 법(ADA)를 준수하기 위하여 만약 귀하가 본 회의를 참석하기 위해 특별한
지원이 필요한 경우 시 서기에게 전화 (562) 431-3538, 내선번호 220 로 연락하십시오. 공청회 당일 오후 12 시까지 통지를 하시면, 본 회의에 참여하기 위한 지원을 받도록
준비할 수 있습니다.

THÔNG BÁO VỀ PHIÊN ĐIỀU TRẦN CÔNG CỘNG
THÀNH PHỐ LOS ALAMITOS
Phòng Hội Đồng
3191 Katella Ave.

Los Alamitos, CA 90720
THÔNG BÁO CHO BIẾT rằng, chiếu theo Bộ luật Bầu cử California Mục 21607.1, Hội đồng Thành phố của Thành phố Los Alamitos sẽ tổ chức một buổi điều trần công khai tại vị trí và địa điểm nêu trên để nhận ý kiến đóng góp về khả năng phân chia lại các quận Thành viên Hội đồng
Phiên Điều Trần Công Cộng #2
NGÀY: 7 Tháng Hai, 2022
GIỜ: 5 giờ 30 chiều.

Chiếu theo Mục EC 21607.1, của Bộ Luật Bầu Cử California, Hội Đồng Thành Phố của Thành phố Los Alamitos sẽ tổ chức một buổi điều trần công khai tại địa chỉ và vị trí nêu trên để duyệt các bản đồ dự thảo, nhận ý kiến của công chúng, và xét đến tiềm năng áp dụng các ranh giới quận đã được sửa đổi của Thành Viên Hội Đồng.

Phiên Điều Trần Công Cộng #3
NGÀY: 28 Tháng Hai, 2022
GIỜ: 6:45 chiều
Phiên Điều Trần Công Cộng #4
NGÀY: 7 Tháng Ba, 2022
GIỜ: 6:00 chiều
Công chúng được mời tham dự và/hoặc gửi thông tin về các Cộng Đồng Cùng Quan Tâm của họ, và các ranh giới phân chia được đề xuất cho quy trình phân chia lại năm 2022.

Để biết thêm thông tin xin đến trang web của Thành Phố tại www.cityoflosalamitos.org hoặc mời quý vị liên lạc với Windmera Quintanar, MMC, Thư Ký Thành Phố, tại số (562) 431-3538, số chuyển tiếp 220 hoặc qua email tại [email protected].

Đóng góp lời khai hoặc khai trên văn bản đều được mời.

Để tuân thủ theo Đạo Luật Người Mỹ Bị Khuyết Tật, nếu quý vị cần sự trợ giúp đặc biệt để tham gia trong buổi họp này, quý vị cần liên lạc với văn phòng của Thư Ký Thành Phố tại số (562) 431-3538, số chuyển tiếp 220. Thông Báo Trước buổi trưa vào ngày có phiên điều trần công cộng sẽ giúp cho Thành Phố thực hiện các sắp xếp để đảm bảo khả năng tiếp cận với buổi họp này.

City of Los Alamitos
Draft Plan Presentation
Dr. Justin Levitt, Vice President
National Demographics Corporation February 28, 2022
2 Redistricting Process & Schedule
Step Description
Two Initial Hearings
1/18 & 2/7
Held prior to release of draft maps.

Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Two Draft Map Hearings
2/28 & 3/7
Two Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps Deadline for Submission
3/2/2022
Deadline for maps available for discussion at the March 7th Hearing Selection of Preferred
Map
3/7/2022
During the 4th Public Hearing, the City Council will make a final selection of a map and introduce an Ordinance for adoption Final Adoption
3/21/2022
Adoption of a map via Ordinance at a regular Council meeting Map Adoption
By April 17, 2022
Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption.

Map adopted via ordinance.

February 28, 2022
3 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of existing
districts

1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for
Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods
and “communities of
interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable
boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of
people to get to a more distant
group of people)
Prohibited: “Shall not favor or
discriminate against a political party.”

3. Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
Redistricting Rules and Goals
February 28, 2022
4 All maps are also available on the
Interactive Web Viewer
Draft Maps
February 28, 2022
5 Public Map 1
February 28, 2022
6 NDC Map 1
February 28, 2022
7 NDC Map 2
February 28, 2022
8 NDC Map 3
February 28, 2022
9 Public Hearing & Discussion
How well do the draft maps comply with
the Fair Maps Act?
What do you like about (parts of) each
map? What works in each option?
 Council may eliminate maps, request
additional maps or tests, and provide
additional direction to the demographer
February 28, 2022
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 7, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 3A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Subject: Public Hearing #4 to Receive Input on the Draft Revised City Council District Boundaries and Select a Preferred District Boundary Map

RECOMMENDATION

1. Open the public hearing to receive public input on district boundaries; and,

2. Select a preferred District Boundary Map; and,

3. Introduce, waive reading in full and authorize reading by title only of Ordinance No. 2022-01, and set for adoption; and,

4. City Attorney Daudt read the title of Ordinance No. 2022-01, entitled, “An

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT MAPS FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS BY-DISTRICT ELECTIONS .”

Page 2 of 6 ends

34886. The City Council subsequently held five public hearings to solicit feedback and review City Council district maps submitted by the public. On July 16, 2018, the City Council introduced and on July 30, 2018, adopted Ordinance 2018-05, selecting a preferred map and election sequence for the newly created City Council District boundaries (“Districting Ordinance”).

Page 3 of 6 ends

Page 4 of 6 ends

Public Hearing 1 – Tuesday, January 18, 2022 – 5:30 p.m.

Public Hearing 2 – Monday, February 7, 2022 – 5:30 p.m.

Public Hearing 3 – Monday, February 28, 2022 – 6:30 p.m.

Frank Marquese stated support for the work the City was doing and. Maggie Marquese received clarification regarding Public Map 1 and NDC Map 1. She stated it would be challenging to split up the Apartment Row neighborhood. Shane Smith identified himself as the individual who submitted the public map. He expressed concern the socioeconomic data was not available on the public map drawing tool and supported participating in the process.

Redistricting Public Hearing #4
March 7, 2022

Page 5 of 6 ends

• Social Media posts spread across Facebook, Twitter, and Nextdoor.com. o 1/10/22 – Introduction of the process and notice of first Public Hearing o 1/18/22 – Reminder to join the first Public Hearing
o 1/27/22 – Requesting input for maps and notice of second Public Hearing o 2/7/22 – Notice of Public Hearing available on the City’s website o 2/14/22 – Notice Redistricting Map Tools available Online and third Public Hearing
o 2/21/22 – Notice of Map Drafts available online and third Public Hearing o 3/3/22 – Notice of Final Map selection and fourth Public Hearing o 3/7/22 – Reminder of fourth Public Hearing
• Pubic Hearing Notices in English, Spanish, Korean, and Vietnamese were published in the News Enterprise on January 12 and February 2, 2012 • Email outreach to 10,105 subscribers via the City’s Weekly Newsletter to drive awareness of the redistricting effort and opportunities to participate in Public Hearings
• Four Public Hearings, which included one (1) virtual meeting, to discuss the redistricting process and gather public input on neighborhoods and communities of interest
Redistricting Website
The redistricting webpage, http://cityoflosalamitos.org/445/2022-Redistricting, was created to provide extensive resources to the public where they could learn about the redistricting process, access all the materials and meeting information, and draw maps based upon their understanding of communities of interest and submit them for consideration.

DISCUSSION
The purpose of this fourth public hearing is to review and discuss draft maps of proposed districts that have been submitted by members of the community and by the City’s consultant National Demographics Corporation (NDC). The City Council will be requested to select a preferred map. Direction regarding the final map should not be given prior to opening Public Hearing #4. An Ordinance to adopt the preferred district will be introduced.

Draft Maps
Maps must be population-balanced to be considered for potential adoption. Resident submitted maps and draft maps were posted on the City’s website on March 3, 2022.

Notice advising draft maps were available was posted on the City’s Facebook and Nextdoor.com page.

Redistricting Public Hearing #4
March 7, 2022

Page 6 of 6 ends

The public submitted one map. NDC originally created three district sequencing scenarios for consideration by the City Council. Based off Council comments from February 28, 2022, NDC has prepared a fourth map for consideration.

Dr. Levitt examined the request to have across the street neighbors in the same district.

Due to the dense population in the Apartment Row neighborhood, it was not feasible to do so. Dr. Levitt of NDC will lead a review of the maps and answer questions.

Next Steps
Tonight the City Council will conduct Public Hearing #4, select its preferred map, and introduce Ordinance No. 2022-01. Following tonight’s Public Hearing, the final map and Ordinance will be adopted at the March 21, 2022 Council meeting.

The deadline to adopt a new map is April 17, 2022. If Council is not able to select a preferred map and/or requests additional changes this evening, the Public Hearing needs to be continued to a date certain. This will to allow time for further consideration and ensure compliance with all legal requirements.

FISCAL IMPACT
Sufficient funds have been budgeted in the Election Expense Account, 10.511.5233.

Submitted by: Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager

Attachment: 1. Ordinance No 2022-01

2. Proposed Draft Maps

3. Neighborhood Maps

4. January 18, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

5. February 7, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

6. February 28, 2022 – Agenda Report and Presentation

7. Ordinance No. 2018-05 – Establishing District Sequencing

8. Ordinance No. 2020-02 – Changing District Sequencing City of Los Alamitos
Draft Plan Presentation
Dr. Justin Levitt, Vice President
National Demographics Corporation
March 7, 2022
2 Redistricting Process & Schedule
Step Description
Two Initial Hearings
1/18 & 2/7
Held prior to release of draft maps.

Education and to solicit input on the communities in the Districts.

Two Draft Map Hearings
2/28 & 3/7
Two Public Hearings to discuss and revise the draft maps Introduction of
Ordinance
3/7/2022
Final selection and adoption of a map at a regular Council meeting Map Adoption
By April 17, 2022
Final map must be posted at least 7 days prior to adoption.

Map adopted via ordinance or resolution.

March 7, 2022
3 Equal Population
Federal Voting Rights Act
No Racial Gerrymandering
Minimize voters shifted to
different election years
Respect voters’ choices /
continuity in office
Future population growth
Preserving the core of existing
districts

1. Federal Laws 2. California Criteria for
Cities

1. Geographically contiguous

2. Undivided neighborhoods
and “communities of
interest”
(Socio-economic geographic areas
that should be kept together)

3. Easily identifiable
boundaries

4. Compact
(Do not bypass one group of
people to get to a more distant
group of people)
Prohibited: “Shall not favor or
discriminate against a political party.”

3. Other Traditional
Redistricting Principles
Redistricting Rules and Goals
March 7, 2022
4 All maps are also available on the
Interactive Web Viewer
Draft Maps
March 7, 2022
5 Public Map 1
March 7, 2022
6 NDC Map 1
March 7, 2022
7 NDC Map 2
March 7, 2022
8 NDC Map 3
March 7, 2022
9 NDC Map 4
March 7, 2022
10 Public Hearing & Discussion
How well do the draft maps comply with
the Fair Maps Act?
What do you like about (parts of) each
map? What works in each option?
 Council may eliminate maps, request
additional maps or tests, and provide
additional direction to the demographer
March 7, 2022
ORDINANCE NO. 2018- 05

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A

DISTRICT- BASED ELECTION SYSTEM FOR MEMBERS

OF THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, members of the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos are currently elected in at- large elections, in which each City Councilmember is elected by voters of the entire City; and
WHEREAS, on March 29, 2018, the City received a certified letter from attorney Kevin Shenkman of the law firm of Shenkman & Hughes asserting that the City' s at-large Councilmember election system violates the California Voting Rights Act (" CVRA") and threatening litigation if the City declines to voluntarily change to a district- based election system where each City Councilmember resides within a designated district boundary and is elected only by the voters in that district; and WHEREAS, the City denies its current at- large election system violates the CVRA or any other provision of law and asserts the City' s election system is legal in all respects and further denies any wrongdoing whatsoever regarding the way it has conducted its City Council elections; and
WHEREAS, while the City Council strongly believes that the interests of all of the City' s residents have been fully and fairly represented under the City' s current at- large election system, the City Council has concluded it is in the public interest to transition to district- based elections due to the uncertainty of litigation to defend against a CVRA lawsuit and the potentially extraordinary cost of such a lawsuit, even if the City were to prevail; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018- 08, declaring the City' s intention to transition from at-large to district- based elections pursuant to California Elections Code Section 10010; and
WHEREAS, the City retained an expert demographer to assist the City with the process of analyzing the City' s population, developing draft district maps consistent with the CVRA and the Federal Voting Rights Act, and gathering input from residents on the potential Council district maps; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Elections Code Section 10010( a)( 1), the City Council held two public hearings on May 29, 2018 and June 4, 2018 where the public was invited to provide input regarding the composition of the City' s voting districts before any draft maps were drawn; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with California Elections Code Section 10010( a)( 2), the 1330275. 1
Attachment 8
City Council held two additional public hearings on June 18, 2018 and July 9, 2018 where the public was invited to provide input regarding the content of the draft maps and the proposed sequence of elections; and
WHEREAS, at its July 9, 2018 meeting, the City Council selected its preferred district map, determined its preferred sequence of district elections, and directed staff to bring forward this Ordinance for its consideration; and WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code Section 34886, it is declared that the change in the method of electing members of the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos made by this Ordinance is in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 ( Chapter 1. 5 ( commencing with Section 14025) of Division 14 of the Elections Code) and to implement the guarantees of Section 7 of Article and Section 2 of Article II of the California Constitution.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Establishment of a District- Based Election System.

A. By- District Elections. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 34886, beginning in November 2020 and upon the expiration of the current terms of office of members of the City Council, City Councilmembers shall be elected by the five Council districts established by subdivision ( B) of this Section. Elections shall take place by- district" as that term is defined in California Government Code Section 34871, meaning one City Councilmember shall be elected from each district by the voters of that district alone.

B. Council Districts. All five Councilmembers shall be elected on a " bydistrict" basis from the Council districts shown and numbered on the district map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference, a copy of which shall be on file in the City Clerk' s office.

C. Sequence of Elections. Commencing with the November 2020 General Municipal Election, and every four years thereafter, the following two Council districts shall be elected by- district: District 1 and District 3. Commencing with the November 2022 General Municipal Election, and every four years thereafter, the following three Council districts shall be elected by-district: District 2; District 4; and District 5.

D. Residency in Council District Required. A Councilmember elected or appointed to represent a Council district must reside in that district and be a registered voter in that district, and any candidate for City Council must reside in, and be a registered voter in, the Council district in which he or she seeks election at the time nomination papers are issued. Termination of residency in a Council district by a Councilmember CC ORD 2018- 05

Page 2 of 5 ends

1330275. 1
shall create an immediate vacancy for that district unless a substitute residence within the district is established within thirty ( 30) days after the termination of residency.

E. Expiration of At- Larqe Terms of Office. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, the Councilmembers in office prior to the November 2020 General Municipal Election shall continue in office until the expiration of the term to which he or she was elected. In the event a vacancy occurs before the expiration of the term of a Councilmember in office prior to the November 2020 General Municipal Election, a person who is appointed or elected in accordance with Section 502 of the Los Alamitos City Charter to fill such vacancy may reside anywhere within the corporate boundaries of the City.

SECTION 3. If necessary to facilitate the implementation of this Ordinance as determined by the County Registrar of Voters, the City Clerk is authorized to make technical adjustments to the Council district boundaries that do not substantively affect the populations in the districts, the eligibility of candidates, or the residence of elected officials within any district. The City Clerk shall consult with the City Manager and City Attorney concerning any technical adjustments deemed necessary and shall advise the City Council of any such adjustments required in the implementation of the districts.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen ( 15) days of the adoption and shall post a Certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 30th day of July, 2018.

V42 .

Troy Ed i ar, M,a, or
ATTEST:
4111l111111111% 1
morimigliiihh,
indmer: Quintanar, CMC, City Ilk
CC ORD 2018- 05

Page 3 of 5 ends

1330275. 1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
I, Windmera Quintanar, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2018- 05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of July, 2018 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council on the 30th day of July, 2018 by the following roll- call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Hasselbrink, Murphy, Chirco, Kusumoto NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Edgar
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Windmer.
firs ana', r MC, Ci y
CC ORD 2018- 05

Page 4 of 5 ends

1330275. 1
CC ORD 2018- 05 - Exhibit A
M
a.
or-I N
U O N
1 PP
a
eFA cid O O
W cn N N
FJ 4yso= fit+
1 luu4°° o pH 4o slog Set
1 0
Ii ttlt1'Dr Ci;
1 I aWluIt' 2
I
p v r 4 i 7Y.un- 1
H
O
TaraWM
Ran,
T
i-qEao, apv rx, r —
o
1 ;1
ai
U (111111
SSkapt_
OZas
aratoga
I I
c
iCBLei 7 , ' :: i ..
1 . : ' -
1 a
Santalana St
U G
II'
iI 1 W
BloornU hl_ yr .
@_
3 i
I I
N
I i i''
gti ,
o
d ..-- iK ' St- i
1 ' S
1 I
t. U w HumbolcSti- 1- 1---
1 i
a
ov
E
i
U 5r_
t_iiPli( v)I
71 i M..—_, J berry St.
v7 9 ;
u
I
a
7 Pin€ 2L
Z •
c Pso Bonita
4 ; 3
at, t
a
Los i

I- I- -
1 rx Ig su=nusly sin 1
rI,k.,:.

I$
Tr'
co
IlD N
Uri W a+ r
a E y o to b 6) r 67 b
0o
r.
e
o
rat,
R
c,
y
Z
U CC ORD 2018- 05

Page 5 of 5 ends

ORDINANCE NO. 2020- 02

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-05 TO REVISE THE SEQUENCE

OF DISTRICT ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, on July 30, 2018, the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos adopted Ordinance No. 2018- 05 establishing a district- based election system for City Councilmembers; and,
WHEREAS, per Ordinance No. 2018- 05, commencing with the November 2020 General Municipal Election, City Councilmembers shall be elected " by- district" from the five Council districts shown and numbered on the district map attached hereto as Exhibit A", and incorporated herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, per Ordinance No. 2018- 05, two Councilmembers will be elected from District 1, and District 3 in November 2020; three Councilmembers will be elected from District 2, District 4, and District 5 in November 2022; and, WHEREAS, on December 16, 2019, Councilmember Warren Kusumoto resigned from his position on the City Council creating a vacant seat (" Council Vacancy"); and, WHEREAS, on December 21, 2019, the City Council voted to fill the Council Vacancy by appointment in accordance with Section 502 of Article V. of the Los Alamitos Charter; and,
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2020, the City Council interviewed candidates and voted to appoint Tanya Doby to fill the Council Vacancy; and, WHEREAS, Councilmember Doby shall serve until the next General Municipal Election in November 2020; and,
WHEREAS, because Councilmember Warren Kusumoto was elected at- large in 2018 for a four-year term ending in 2022, and because Doby' s term will lapse in 2020, absent an amendment to Ordinance No. 2018- 05, an at- large election in 2020 would be necessary to fill the the remaining two- year term resulting from the Council Vacancy; and, WHEREAS, to advance the transition from at- large to by- district elections in the City of Los Alamitos, and in furtherance of the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 ( Chapter 1 . 5 ( commencing with Section 14025) of Division 14 of the Elections Code), the City Council desires to amend Ordinance 2018- 05 to provide for the election of three, rather than two, Councilmembers by- district in November 2020.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, DOES 1463107. 1
Attachment 9
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. Amendment to Sequence of District Elections. Section 2( C) of Ordinance No. 2018- 005 is hereby amended to read as follows ( new text in underline, deleted text in strikethrough)
C. Sequence of Elections. Commencing with the November 2020 General Municipal Election, and every four years thereafter, the following three twe Council districts shall be elected by- district: District 11 District 2, and District 3.

Commencing with the November 2022 General Municipal Election, and every four years thereafter, the following two three Council districts shall be elected by-district: District 2; District 4; and District 5.

SECTION 3. Except as expressly modified above, Ordinance No. 2018- 05 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen ( 15) days of the adoption and shall post a Certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 2020.

F ichar - D' M hy, Mayor
ATTEST:
r 111 1 -
ILViI1&
Windme - Quintanar, MMC, City C
CC ORD 2020- 02

Page 2 of 4 ends

1463107. 1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
I, Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2020- 02 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 21st day of January, 2020 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 17th day of February, 2020, by the following roll- call vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Hasselbrink, Chirco, Doby, Grose, Murphy NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
t1Y1Vi1IVIj ,4
Windm' er: Quintanar, MMC, Ci y C -
CC ORD 2020- 02

Page 3 of 4 ends

1463107. 1
Exhibit A
City of Los Alamitos Council District Map
CC ORD 2020- 02

Page 4 of 4 ends

1463107. 1
V
c
7's
b
le i ,
o z U N ct V ZT—+
ope. r. r, et
CU C" N N
I/ Cu W c N
CA Cit C: C1 uuyo uo PH 4o esio8sat '
I
g• rim Ci
vli f 1
I
III
I O
V/ 1 gan:, tDrTrI
Z. 4 0
cuto tj
C
1f ma

Z''') S
ION111 : Z
Santa lara St>
1ii_
N
m
U
oE
3 92I.

S
W m !
E
o,
o
T.

Li
1ToT
g
i
V
iKinT 3
C)
U
y
a
m
U J
1 ro Reatjan St
o
UN! i
o Pro Bonita
Los . .._. ei=— --= 4
6 NATS tlU3tlIlElV MIYI
J
Imuis-4.

L.•
r
y
up
1710.) .,
CAU
v
o
n
S a x
ii
cs o›-. cc
gD is X

0. c
o
C..)
cn .
z
z
N
N
City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: March 21, 2022 ITEM NUMBER: 12A
To: Mayor Shelley Hasselbrink & Members of the City Council Presented By: Craig Koehler, Finance Director
Subject: Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review and Financial Update for Fiscal Year 2021-22

SUMMARY
This report provides a review of Mid-Year General Fund budget for the Fiscal Year 2021- 22 and a projection for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Review the Mid-year General Fund budget for the Fiscal Year 2021-22, and projection for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2022; and,

2. Provide direction and comments.

BACKGROUND
On June 21, 2021, the City Council approved and adopted a balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22, which included operating revenues of $18,393,865 and operating expenditures of $16,646,847, excluding transfers.

On January 25, 2022, the Budget Standing Committee received early preliminary projections for Fiscal Year 2021-22 that indicated a surplus primarily from departmental savings. Since that meeting, a new sales forecast has been received from HdL. Staff has also been working with the departments to receive updated information in connection with projections of additional requested line-item expenditures.

On March 9, 2022, the Budget Standing Committee received the Mid-Year General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22 and projections for the Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2022.

This report reflects the most updated information.

Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 2 of 7 ends

DISCUSSION
The economy as a whole is recovering since the outbreak and spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic activity has shown signs of rebounding as reflected in housing sales, durable goods orders, and consumer spending. According to a recent economic forecast by Beacon Economics and UC Riverside Center for Economic Forecasting and Development, the U.S. economy is rebounding and is not the same economy it was a year and a half ago. Structurally, portions of the economy that were materially impacted by the pandemic have yet to see a full return. Consumer spending on services including healthcare, recreation, travel, and hospitality remains 3% below where it was before the pandemic. Business investment in non-residential structures also remains depressed, as well as U.S. exports. But weaknesses in these sectors have been more than offset by stronger than normal levels of activity in other sectors of the economy, including consumer spending on goods, a robust housing market, and business investment in equipment and software.

The fiscal and monetary policy response in the United States to the COVID crisis was unprecedented in terms of its scale, scope, and speed. Legislation passed by the Congress in March 2020, December 2020, and March 2021, provided a total of nearly $5.8 trillion in fiscal support to the U.S. economy, representing approximately 28% of the total U.S. GDP. Los Alamitos has benefited directly and was a recipient of $2.7 million from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and received $513 thousand in Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) funding. This stimulus funding will be used for authorized expenditures as defined under the ARPA and CARES Act funding guidelines.

However, as the economy shifts to full recovery, concerns over inflation are mounting. In a recent report from HdL, dated January 26, 2022, prices are growing but are now outpacing the rate of sales. Projections for year-over-year growth are 11.5% for FY21-22, however slower growth is projected for FY22-23 and FY23-24.

This mid-year report represents a snapshot in time and reflects recorded information through December 31, 2021, or six months of the fiscal year, and projection of Fiscal Year 2021-22. It will provide the Budget Standing Committee and City Council with an update on the financial status of the City’s General Fund at mid-year, and projection of Fiscal Year 2021-22.

General Fund Revenues
The financial summary below depicts the Adopted Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-22, actual General Fund revenues through December 31, 2021 and a projection to June 30, 2022.

Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 3 of 7 ends

Property Taxes, Sales and Use Taxes, and Measure Y Local Sales Taxes, are the three largest revenue sources for Los Alamitos, and comprise approximately 68% of all revenue generated and collected by the City.

Property Taxes
Property taxes remain one of the largest revenue sources for the City and the majority are received in December and April, following the payment due dates. For secured property taxes, the first installment is due November 1 and delinquent after December 10, the second installment is due on February 1 and delinquent after April 10.

A report received from HdL at the end of 2021, indicated a preliminary net value change in property values up 7.4% over the 2020-21 tax roll, and indicates that property taxes are continuing an upward trend. The projection for Fiscal Year 2021-22 will come in at approximately $111K higher, or 2% better than the Adopted Budget.

The change is attributed to the 1.036% Proposition 13 inflation adjustment of $21.8 million, which accounted for 12% of all growth experienced in the City. Residential properties make up 56.4% of all values in the City and grew by $62.1 million (4.4%), which accounted for 34.5% of all property value growth. Commercial properties added $47.4 million (10.3%) and industrial properties added $35.8 million (9.4%). Unsecured values increased by $31.2 million (19.7%) on the strength of Epson America’s new assessment of $33.8 million.
2021-22
Adopted
Budget
Actual thru
12/31/21
2021-22
Projection Variance
Revenue Summary
Property Taxes 4,584,079 1,697,998 4,695,498 111,419
Sales Tax 3,140,400 895,875 3,153,615 13,215
Sales Tax - Local (Measure Y) 4,438,588 1,818,505 5,601,000 1,162,412 Transit Occupancy Tax (TOT) 180,670 146,367 292,734 112,064 Business Licenses 671,972 407,574 817,188 145,216
Utility Users Tax 2,010,465 980,462 2,009,211 (1,254)
Franchise Fees 667,836 145,101 665,300 (2,536)
Licenses & Permits 923,131 467,382 922,861 (270)
Fines & Forfeitures 738,309 141,460 318,378 (419,931)
Use of Money & Property 229,280 38,406 240,000 10,720
Other Agencies 120,200 39,478 46,000 (74,200)
Charges for Current Services 620,935 440,540 660,907 39,972 Misc. 68,000 87,270 87,270 19,270
Total Revenue 18,393,865 7,306,418 19,509,962 1,116,097 Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 4 of 7 ends

Residential prices have continued to rise in response to lower inventory and low interest rates. The median sale price of a detached single family residential home in Los Alamitos from January through August 2021 was $1.1 million. This represents a $191K (21.68%) increase in median sale price over the prior year.

Sales & Use Taxes
A report from Hdl, dated February 19, 2022, reported data for the quarter ending September, 2021. Sales were up 14.4% for the 3rd quarter 2021 compared to the same time frame for 2020, and reflected increases for most of the major business groups.

Possible headwinds into 2022 could include pent up demand for travel, experiences shifting way from taxable goods, and expected interest rate hikes that will result in more costly financing. The projection and estimate for Sales & Use Taxes for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 is $3.2 million, slightly higher than Adopted Budget.

When taking a closer look at the individual business groups, autos and transportation reflected a strong demand that boosted the cost of new cars by 10% and used cars by 26%. Available inventory through 2022 is expected to be constrained, but shows signs of loosening. For building and construction, lumber prices rose in September due to commodity availability issues, and prices will remain high through mid-2022. For fuel and service stations, demand for all fuels is much higher than one year ago. The average price of a gallon of gas for California reached a record level of $4.75 per gallon as of November 2021. Even with the with elevated prices, HdL is not anticipating a significant negative impact on the future consumption of fuel. Strong short-term gains are projected for the next three quarters.

For general consumer goods, concerns related to COVID case rates do not seem to be impacting consumer’s ability and willingness to spend at retail establishments. Short-term expectations remain elevated, which is driven by higher customer charges and solid household fundamentals. The cost of taxable goods is expected to rise faster than sales.

Recent results from hotels and entertainment venues demonstrate consumer desire to travel and spend more. However, rates for growth will likely vary significantly by region.

For the state and county pools, year-to-date collections reflected that 42% came from marketplace facilitators and general retailers, another third from business-industry companies, and 11% from vehicle acquisitions primarily private-party sales processed through the DMV.

Measure Y (Local Sales Tax)
With successful passage of Measure Y, Los Alamitos is now benefiting form an additional

1.5% sales tax. New to the City’s revenue stream, this has now become the largest source of revenue at 27.8% of total revenues collected by the City, and exceeds property tax which was traditionally the top revenue producer. Projections are greatly exceeding the budget, and the projection for Fiscal Year 2021-22 is $5.6 million.

Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 5 of 7 ends

The primary reason for the large variance from the budget and the long-term model is that certain industry groups, like autos and transportation and general consumer goods, do not follow the true 150% ratio of transaction tax (Measure Y) to the Bradley-Burns (Sales & Use Tax), and are much higher ratios, driving the average across all industry groups to 173.4%. HdL has used a more conservative factor of 165% in their estimates.

Even though the recorded history for Measure Y Local sales Tax is less than 12 months, the projections for the current fiscal year and beyond are promising.

Transit Occupancy Tax (TOT)
Transit Occupancy Tax (TOT) is trending at budget and includes the newest hotel, Fairfield by Marriott. Revenues for FY2021-22 may see an increase and exceed budget as travel and leisure activity resumes following the restrictions that have been imposed by the pandemic.

Fines & Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures include red light camera and parking fines, and other moving violations, and are currently trending lower than the budget. COVID related challenges have negatively impacted revenue from the Photo Enforcement program and parking citation revenue. Restrictions on businesses and public gatherings have resulted in less traffic and a reduction in violations. Additionally, staffing issues related to COVID resulted in less violations being reviewed and processed.

The Police Department lobby was also periodically closed to the public due to COVID which prevented access for the public should someone need to view video footage of their violation. As COVID related mandates are lifted, the Police Department is seeing an increase in activity and expects revenue to return to normal in the next fiscal year.

With an anticipated retirement this year, a recruitment for Photo Enforcement Operator will be done so that the program is not impacted by a vacancy.

Overall, General Fund revenues for FY2021-22 are projected to exceed the Adopted Budget by $1.1 million.

General Fund Expenditures
The financial summary below reflects the Adopted Budget General Fund Expenditures for Fiscal Year 2021-22, actual expenditures through December 31, 2021 and a projection to June 30, 2022.

Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 6 of 7 ends

For the most part, department expenditures are trending with the Adopted Budget. The three largest variances are in Police, Development Services, and Non-Departmental, as explained below.

Police
The Police department budget is projected to have a potential savings of approximately $502K, reflecting vacancies in Youth Programs and Traffic divisions.

Development Services
Projections for Development Services for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 are estimated to be approximately $283K higher than budget. This is mainly attributable to higher materials, supplies, and services for the three maintenance divisions.

Non-Departmental
Non-Departmental expenditures include contractual services not included in other department budgets, credit card processing fees, health insurance for retirees, and CIP projects funded by the General Fund, and additional approved Measure Y expenditures of $275K with the recent award of contract bid for the Los Alamitos Street Improvement Project on Various Streets.

The Mid-Year Fiscal Year 2021-22 General Fund revenues are projected to exceed the Adopted Budget, with an estimated surplus of $1.1 million. This is primarily attributable to higher than anticipated Measure Y Local Sales Tax. The estimated surplus is before any additional CIP needs, UAL paydown considerations, and any additional reserves. It is important to keep in mind that this estimate is not an exact science, and many other factors outside the City’s control, like inflation, shifts in the economy, and global unrest, 2021-22
Adopted Budget
Actual
thru
12/31/21
2021-22
Projection Variance
Expenditure Summary
City Council 66,895 28,841 60,171 (6,724)
Administration 1,051,340 442,042 995,166 (56,174)
Finance 760,754 342,418 723,148 (37,606)
City Attorney 176,000 66,574 176,029 29
Police 7,376,078 3,514,436 6,873,555 (502,523)
Development Services 3,583,622 1,732,259 3,866,431 282,809 Recreation 1,775,322 1,001,492 1,793,316 17,994
Non-Departmental 1,856,836 374,772 2,184,006 327,170
Total Expenditures 16,646,847 7,502,834 16,671,822 24,975 Mid-Year General Fund Budget Review for Fiscal Year 2021-22 March 21, 2022

Page 7 of 7 ends

may affect the outcome, and the final numbers will not be known until the end of the fiscal period.

Other Considerations for Discussion
PERS Unfunded Liability
A report for an early paydown option of the PERS Unfunded Liability (UAL) was presented to Council on June 21, 2021. At that time, Council requested staff to return to the BSC for additional study. A follow up report was provided to the BSC on August 23, 2021. Options to study the UAL included an independent actuarial study and the GovInvest Pension Liability Model. Approval to pursue and acquire the GovInvest modeling software was received.

At the January 25 meeting, the BSC received a presentation of the GovInvest pension model and its capabilities. Early paydown of the UAL is possible and savings range from $3 million to $9 million, depending on the level of funding. In addition, utilization of the City’s Section 115 Trust was discussed. Further study is warranted to determine goals for an early payoff and funding of the UAL, along with accompanying policies.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact, as this report provides an update on the financial status of the General Fund revenues and expenditures relative to mid-year, and projection of Fiscal Year 2021-22.

Submitted by: Craig Koehler, Finance Director
Approved by: Chet Simmons, City Manager

Los Alamitos City CouncilMarch 21, 2022

Los Alamitos City Council
March 21, 2022