P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View Date: 1997 T 6S; R 2W; Mountain Diablo. B.M. c. Address: 347 1st Street City: Los Altos Zip: 94022
d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation:
Assessor Parcel No. 167-40-047
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The 3,920 sq. ft. building at 347 First Street (APN #167-40-048) is a single-story community recreational building, known as the American Legion Hall, Post 558, occupies a 6,970 sq. ft. lot adjacent in Los Altos.
The building’s architectural style can be classifiedas Minimal Traditional style, with a one-story rectangular structure with a concrete foundation, two gabled roof forms build end-to-end, horizontal wood siding, double-hung windows, chimney, and lack of ornamentation.The building alterations to the original design have not significantly reduced the overall features typical of this style of architecture and the changes that were made can be reversed. Replacing the double-hung window sashes and covering the V-groove wood siding with stucco have altered the primary facade. The stucco can be removed and horizontal V-groove wood siding could be restored. All of the remaining facades have the original siding intact. Double-hung window sashes can replace the existing window sashes as well. All of the original double hung window sashes have been replaced with sliding or fixed sashes, and a few original window openings at the rear are covered with plywood. The window fenestrations, window wood frames and wood sills have been left intact. The rear gable-roof addition occurred over 50 years ago in 1948 and during the period of significance. The exterior doors are not original but have maintained the original door opening locations. The building retains the same horizontal massing, footprint, shape and roof form, with the original window fenestrations and horizontal siding (on three facades). The alterations to the doors and windows occurred sometime between 1945 and 1966. Subsequently, some of the present day exterior aluminum-clad glass doors may have been changed recently in the 1990’s due to their contemporary style. (See continuation sheet DPR523L) *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP13. Community Center *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: Primary Front Elevation, August 2021 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: Historic
Prehistoric Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
American Legion, Post 558, 347 1st Street, Los Altos, CA 94022 *P8. Recorded by: Garvaglia Architecture, Inc., 582 Market Street #1800, San Francisco, CA 94104
*P9. Date Recorded: 11/23/21
*P10. Survey Type:
Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Garavaglia Architecture, Inc: The American Legion 558, 347 1st Street, Los Altos, CA Historic Resource Evaluation *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List):
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
ATTACHMENT 2
244
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
(Continued from DPR523A, P3A Description)
The landscaping and setting at 347 First Street has been altered considerably since 1940 when the building was constructed.
Originally this part of Los Altos was primarily an agricultural town and has now developed into a dense suburban city, as is evident by comparing the aerial photographs. The City of Los Altos was incorporated in 1952 and thus the major transformation of Los Altos began. Much of the surrounding area consisted of orchards and farmlands in 1940’s. The lot has remained its original size but the neighborhood has changed as well as the lot itself. The property’s former landscaping is no longer extant and the front yard has been in filled with concrete. Concrete also surrounds the building on the sides and rear portion of the building; therefore, 347 First Street does not retain integrity of setting.
The building retains some elements of its original materials, including the wood V-groove siding (on the north, east and west facades), window fenestrations, wood window frames, wood windowsills and wood roof framing. Most of the wood elements were made of redwood. The front and rear gables with vents are original. The rear addition alters the original scale and proportion of the original structure but this addition occurred over 50 years ago in 1948 during the period of significance (1940-1959). The V-groove wood siding on the front facade has been covered over with plaster, but this occurred sometime between 1960-66, after the period of significance. All of the original window sashes on the building, except for the one on the east facade have been replaced or covered over with plywood. The original window fenestrations, wood frames and wood sills have been left intact.
The rear entry porch may be original but is unknown but appears similar to what was originally there. 347 First Street retains the integrity of some of its building materials; therefore, 347 First Street does not retain integrity of materials.
ATTACHMENT 2
245
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
B1. Historic Name: None
B2. Common Name: None
B3. Original Use: Community Hall B4. Present Use: Community Hall *B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional style
*B6. Construction History: Construction began on April 1940, with use beginning in January 1941. *B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date: N/a Original Location: N/a *B8. Related Features:
None.
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown War Veterans *B10. Significance: Theme: Event Area: Los Altos
Period of Significance: 1935 - 1950 Property Type: Commercial Applicable Criteria: California/National Register Criterion 3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) The building sits on a rectangular shaped landlocked on the sides and rear, with frontage along 1st Street. Prior to the hall’s construction, the site was originally part of Sarah L. Winchester’s ranch land and then owned by Paul Shoup and the Altos Land Company. The property was purchased in 1940 and construction began immediately by the legionnaires themselves.
The building was occupied by 1941 with the rear addition constructed in 1948. At that time, the surrounding neighborhood was rural and even the lot had mature landscaping, pine trees and other shrubbery, plants within the front setback and along the west side of the building. By 1956, the immediate context depicts a significant increase in development of the neighborhood with new houses and increased density in the urban core.
The process to building the hall began in 1938, when army veterans headed by Jack Welch submitted their application to form a Legion post in March and it was approved by December of that year. By January 1939, the post was hosting community functions and had formed committees. In April of 1939, the Post 558 received its official charter. The property was purchased by the American Legion Post 558 in 1940. The building construction began on April 18, 1940 by World War I amry veterans, and it was occupied in January 1941.
Integrity:
The property maintains most of its historic integrity per the National Register seven aspects of integrity and the five aspects of historical integrity under the Los Altos Preservation Code. The building maintains its original location within the parcel.
The property’s former landscaping is no longer extant and the front yard has been in filled with concrete. Concrete also surrounds the building on the sides and rear portion of the building.Originally, the site was located in a more rural setting, (Continued on next page, DPR523L)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References:
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Garvaglia Architecture, Inc., 582 Market Street #1800, San Francisco, CA 94104
*Date of Evaluation: November 23, 2021
(This space reserved for official comments.)
ATTACHMENT 2
246
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
(Continued from previous page, DPR523B, Integrity)
but the original setting has become more urbanized due to the incorporation of the City in 1952. Therefore, the site has not preserved the integrity of setting. Although the Minimal Tradition style of design has been altered due to replacing the original materials, including doors with commercial aluminum glass doors, replacing some of the original double hung window sashes with sliding or fixed sashes, and covering other window openings with plywood. A rear addition alters the original scale and proportion of the original structure. The building retains the same horizontal massing, rectangular shape and roof form. The window fenestrations, window wood frames and wood sills have been left intact, and three facades have kept the original V-groove wood siding. Overall, the form, interior layout, structure, design and materials are intact and features of Minimal Traditional design of architecture; therefore, 347 First Street does retain integrity of the original workmanship, design and materials. The hall continues to embody the feeling of a Minimal Traditional architectural style, a representative style from 1935 to 1955. The minimal alterations over time have not diminished its origins of that architectural style, and it continues to embody the property’s association or feeling with early 20th century development in Los Altos. The hall served as a space for community meetings that led to the incorporation of the City of Los Altos. The subject property has continuously served and continues to serve the citizens of Los Altos and has housed meetings for local youth programs, school PTAs, the Red Cross, social clubs, military groups, political leaders and many other organizations. The structure continues to serve the community and is associated with the history of Los Altos. 347 1st Street retains six (6) out of seven (7) aspects of integrity under the National Register aspects of integrity and four out of five criteria for historical significance under the Los Altos Historic Preservation Ordinance.
As such, the building retains sufficient integrity to remain eligible under the National Register’s seven aspects of integrity and the five local historical significance criteria discussed above.
EVALUATION:
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) / California Register of Historical Resources:
To be potentially eligible for individual listing on the NRHP/CRHR, a structure must usually be more than 50 years old, must have historic significance, and must retain its physical integrity.The subject building at 347 First Street was constructed in 1940 and is more than 50 years old, therefore meets the age requirement. In terms of historic significance, the NRHP/CRHR evaluates a resource based on the following four criteria:
A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
D. That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory.
ATTACHMENT 2
247
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
Criterion A/1: Event
As stated by the National Park Service (NPS), this criterion “recognizes properties associated with single events, such as the founding of a town, or with a pattern of events, repeated activities, or historic trends, such as the gradual rise of a port city's prominence in trade and commerce.” When considering a property for significance under this criterion, the associated event or trends“must clearly be important within the associated context: settlement, in the case of the town, or development of a maritime economy, in the case of the port city…Moreover, the property must have an important association with the event or historic trends”
The building at 347 First Street began construction in 1940 and was dedicated in 1941 during a period when Los Altos was not yet an incorporated city. The application to the American Legion Headquarters for a charter for a Los Altos post occurred on March 11, 1938, by organizer Howard “Jack” Welch. The legion purchased the subject property in 1940 and construction began immediately. In fact, Post 558 obtained the permit prior to completing the purchase of the land from Altos Land Company. At this time, the town was an unincorporatedarea with the central business district located near today’s intersection of Foothill Expressway and Main Street, close to the subject property. With nowhere for the townspeople to meet, the Legion Hall, Post 558 at 347 First Street became the central meeting area for all of the towns’ political, civic, and social events.
The American Legion Hall was instrumental in the formation of the City of Los Altos. The Hall functioned as the town’s de facto town hall building and held town forum meetings. Future Senator Alan Cranston and other prominent members of Los Altos met there regularly. Legion Hall was the meeting place for all the city functions prior to Los Altos becoming an official city of Santa ClaraCounty. By 1949, many Los Altos residents were dissatisfied with the zoning policy of Santa Clara County, and there was a constant threat of annexation by neighboring Palo Alto and Mountain View, so the citizens of Los Altos decided to incorporate. On December 1, 1952, Los Altos became the eleventh city of Santa Clara County. 347 First Street is most closely associated with the area’s transition from an unincorporated town to become the incorporated city “Los Altos” and to the broad pattern of development of Los Altos and of Santa Clara County. The building functioned as the town hall building from 1940 up until the time that the Civic Center was occupied in 1959. The Legion Hall was instrumental in the formation of the City of Los Altos as it functioned as its town hall building and held town forum meetings and Senator Alan Cranston and other prominent members of Los Altos met there regularly. The subject property is associated with events, repeated activitiesand to the development trends of Los Altos to qualify it as significant under criterion A/1. The subject property has been found to have a particular or important association with all of the towns’ activities and events until the late 1950’s, when other gathering places and the Civic Center are built.
Construction of the Civic Center began in 1958 and occupation began in 1959.
The subject property is associated with the development trends and activities of the town of LosAltos, and it does appear to be eligible for consideration for the NRHP/CRHR under criterion A/1 at any level for association.
Criterion B/2: Individuals
ATTACHMENT 2
248
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
This criterion applies to properties associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified and documented. Based on the research conducted on the area’s history a reasonable likelihood does not exist that additional information will identify any other historically significant person associated with the subject property. Therefore, it does not appear that 347 1st Street is eligible for consideration for the NRHP or CRHR under criterion B/1 and any level associated with individuals Criterion C/3: Design and Construction
Under this criterion, properties may be eligible if they “embody the distinctive characteristics ofa type, period, or method of construction, …represent the work of a master, …possess high artistic values, or…represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.” According to the National Park Service, “Type, period, or method of construction’ refers to the way certain properties are related to one another by cultural tradition or function, by dates of construction or style, or by choice or availability of materials and technology. A structure is eligible as a specimen of its type or period of construction if it is an important example (within its context) ofbuilding practices of a particular time in history.”
The design of the 347 First Street most closely resembles the Minimal Traditional architectural style. A one-story rectangular plan, front-gabled roof, horizontal wood siding and lack of ornamentation characterize Minimal Traditional architecture. While the subject property has features associated with this architectural style, it does not embody sufficient distinctive characteristics of the style due to alterations over time, as required to be eligible under criterion C/3. Replacing the windows, replacing the front entry door, and covering the horizontal siding with stucco altered the primary façade’s integrity. The property, as it appears now, is not fully representative as a prominent example of Minimal Traditional style of architecture.
The roof hasconnecting double gable roof structures. The second gable roof at the rear of the structure defines the later addition (referred to as the Club) and built in 1948. The side and rear walls are made of wood V-groove siding and it is known the front elevation originally had the same siding due to historic photo from Los Altos News. Alterations to the front facade occurred in the early-to-mid 1950’s with the present day stucco sheathing covering the historic V-groove siding, replacement of the front entry door with a commercial style door and replacing the historic double-hung windows with fixed windows. The subject building contains only one original window on the east facade. The original window openings on the side elevations areintact with original wood frames and windowsills and only sashes replaced.
The subject property does not appear to be a significant example of a Minimal Traditional,the architectural style it most closely represents. Therefore, it does not appear eligible for consideration for the NRHP/CRHR as an individual resource under criterion C/3 at any level.
Criterion D/4: Information Potential
The building is of common methods of construction and does not appear likely to yield important information about historic construction, methods, materials or technologies. Therefore, it does not appear the property is eligible for consideration for the National Register under Criterion D/4 at any level. Archival research and physical investigation of the site focused on the above ground resource only. Therefore, no informed determination could be made regarding the property’s potential for archaeological resources that would be eligible for the NRHP or CRHR under Criterion D/4.
ATTACHMENT 2
249
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
City of Los Altos Historic Preservation Ordinance:
As a part of this investigation and evaluation, the building and its parcel were evaluated according to the City of Los Altos Historic Preservation Ordinance, and the property meets the criteria for designation as an Historic Resource according the Municipal Code Section 12.44.040:
A. Age: The building was built after the turn of the twentieth century and prior to 1948, making it at least 80 years old, meeting the 50-year age criteria;
B. Integrity: As noted above, the building is substantially unchanged, retaining its historical integrity although exhibiting physical deterioration from its age and alterations over time. The majority of the character-defining features remain, and the building and its immediate setting reflect the original design, setting, materials, workmanship, and feeling from the early twentieth century;
C. Significance: The American Legion Hall building was associated with a single significant event or a pattern of events that have made a significant contribution to broad patterns of local or regional history, or cultural heritage of California or the United States (as noted earlier under NRHP/CRHR criteria). The building at 347 First Street began construction in 1940 and was dedicated in 1941, during a period when Los Altos was not yet an incorporated city. The application to charter American Legion (Post 558) occurred on March 11, 1938. The Legion purchased the subject property in 1940 and construction began immediately. At this time the town was an unincorporated area with the central business district located near today’s intersection of Foothill Expressway and Main Street, close to the subject property. With nowhere for the townspeople to meet, the Legion Post 558 at 347 First Street became the central meeting area for all of the towns’ political, civic and social events. Los Altos became the eleventh city of Santa Clara County in December of 1952. Having outgrown Legion Hall, the City began construction of the modernist Civic Center in 1958. The American Legion building at 347 First Street is most closely associated with the area’s transition from an unincorporated town to become an incorporated city and to the broad pattern of development of Los Altos and of Santa Clara County. The subject property is associated with events, repeated activities and to the development trends, to qualify it as significant under criterion “Event.” The subject property has been found to have a particular or important association with all of the towns’ activities and events until other gathering places and the Civic Center is built in 1959, and it is found to be a significant resource under events associated with its significant contribution to broad patterns of local or regional history.
Local Landmark Designation
To be potentially eligible for individual listing as a local landmark in the City of Los Altos, a structure must usually be more than 50 years old, must have historic significance, and must retain its physical integrity. The subject building at 347 First Street was constructed in 1940 and is more than 50 years old, therefore meets the age requirement. In terms of integrity and historic significance as outlined in Section 12.44.040 of the City of Los Altos Municipal Code, the subject resource meets the criteria as noted above.
ATTACHMENT 2
250
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
Under Chapter 12.44.070 of the City of Los Altos Municipal Code, a proposed landmark must not only satisfy the three criteria outlined in section 12.44.040. The Veteran’s Hall at 347 First Street must have special historical, cultural, archeological, scientific, architectural or aesthetic interest or value as part of the heritage or history of the city, the county, the state or the nation. 347 First Street has special historical value as part of the history of the City of Los Altos. The subject building constructed in 1941, originally functioned as the Legion Hall Post 558. Soon after, the building became the meeting area for all of the town’s political, civic and social events and was instrumental in the establishment of the City of Los Altos. The Hall became the town’s de facto town hall. 347 First Street is associated with the area’s transition from being an unincorporated town to become Los Altos City on Dec. 1,1952. It was not until 1959 that Los Altos had a Civic Center to conduct official city business. The building is found to be associated with its significant contribution to the heritage and history of the city.
B12 References
“Ancestry® | Genealogy, Family Trees & Family History Records.” Accessed September 9,2021. https://www.ancestry.com/.
Bassett, W., and American Legion, Post 558. “347 1st Street Los Altos: Application for Los AltosHistoric Designation,” 2019.
“California Digital Newspaper Collection.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://cdnc.ucr.edu/. Calisphere. “Calisphere: The Deeper You Look, the More You Discover.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://calisphere.org/.
Chapman, Robin. “Santa Clara Valley Lives: Historical Los Altos American Legion Works on Landmark Building Status.” Los Altos Town Crier, March 25, 2020. https://www.losaltosonline.com/community/santa-clara-valley-liveshistorical-los-altos- american-legion-works-on-landmark-building-status/article_62137833-4354-5512-a392- a4fadcf74a82.html.
“Chapter 12.44 - HISTORIC PRESERVATION | Code of Ordinances | Los Altos, CA | Municode Library.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://library.municode.com/ca/los_altos/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT12BU CO_CH12.44HIPR_ART2DEHIRE_12.44.040CRDE.
City of Los Altos. “City of Los Altos Historic Resources Inventory Report.” Santa Clara County,Calif., 1997. ———. “City of Los Altos Historic Resources Inventory Report.” Santa Clara County, Calif.,2008. ———. “City of Los Altos Historic Resources Inventory Report.” Santa Clara County, Calif.,2012. “Downtown Vision | City of Los Altos California.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.losaltosca.gov/communitydevelopment/page/downtown-vision. “Early History (U.S. National Park Service).” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.nps.gov/articles/early-history.htm.
“FrameFinder - UCSB Library.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/. “Historic Inventory | City of Los Altos California.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.losaltosca.gov/historicalcommission/page/historic-inventory. “History | The American Legion.” Accessed September 9, 2021.https://www.legion.org/history. “History of Two Cities - Los Altos Chamber of Commerce, CA.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.losaltoschamber.org/history-of-two-cities.
Los Altos News Staff. “Boundaries to Be Fixed.” The Los Altos News, September 21, 1950.
ATTACHMENT 2
251
Agenda Item # 8.
DPR 523L (9/2013
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
Trinomial
CONTINUATION SHEET
Property Name: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page _____ of _____
Resource Name or # American Legion Hall Post 558 *NRHP Status Code California Register 3CS and National Register 3S
———. “Citizens’ Group Officers Nominated.” The Los Altos News, February 3, 1949. ———. “Forming Planning District Discussed.” The Los Altos News, June 23, 1949. ———. “Legion Hall Dedication on Feb. 7.” The Los Altos News, January 23, 1941. ———. “Legion Hall Setting for P.T.A. Play Day.” The Los Altos News, October 16, 1941. ———. “Legion Post To Send Local Youth To ‘Boy’s State’ - Arrange For Financing Building AtTuesdays Meeting.” The Los Altos News, April 4, 1940.
———. “Legion Post Will Build “Own Home“ on First St.” The Los Altos News, March 21, 1940. ———. “Legion to Sponsor Card Party Jan. 22.” The Los Altos News, January 8, 1942. ———. “Local Legion Post Formally Installed Here, Tuesday.” The Los Altos News, January 12,1939. ———. “Local Legion Post Receives Charter.” The Los Altos News, April 20, 1939. ———. “Los Altos Welcomes New Legion Post.” The Los Altos News, March 11, 1938. ———. “Peek into the Past- The First Meeting of the Los Altos Citizens Association.” The LosAltos News, March 1949. ———. “Report on New Local American Legion Post Is Made.” The Los Altos News, December15, 1938. ———. “Special Meeting of L.A. Red Cross Tonight.” The Los Altos News, December 11, 1941. ———. “Work on New Legion Home, Starts Today.” The Los Altos News, April 18, 1940.
Glendale, City of. “Minimal Traditional Style”, Glendale Design Guidelines for Residential Buildingsin Adopted Historic District. https://www.glendaleca.gov/home/showdocument?id=12904 McAlester, Virginia Savage. A Field Guide to American Houses: The Definitive Guide to Identifyingand Understanding America's Domestic Architecture. Random House Inc, 2015. 586-595.
McDonald, Don. “Los Altos Viewed Flaming Sky on Night of 1906 Earthquake: Early Los Altos.” Los Altos Town Crier, April 27, 2005. https://www.losaltosonline.com/archives/los-altos-viewed-flaming-sky-on-night-of- 1906- earthquake-early-los-altos/article_644e17dd-4f53-5996-9771-a2e97cb2d428.html.
National Parks Service. “World War II Temporary Construction”. Golden Gate NationalRecreational Area https://www.nps.gov/articles/ww2-tempconstruction.htm
National Register of Historic Places. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Washington, D.C.? U.S.
Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources,1998. “Newspapers.Com - Historical Newspapers from 1700s-2000s.” Accessed September 9, 2021. https://www.newspapers.com/.
Report, Los Altos Town Crier Staff-Town Crier Staff. “Los Altos Veterans Look to Preserve Hallwith Historical Designation.” Los Altos Town Crier, February 5, 2020. https://www.losaltosonline.com/community/los-altosveterans-look-to-preserve-hall- with-historical-designation/article_a8c68b39-1dba-50ca-824caab18a5d1606.html.
Salameda, Joe. Memories of Los Altos. Los Altos, 1982.
“US$3300 (1940 US Dollars) - Wolfram|Alpha.” Accessed September 9, 2021.https://www.wolframalpha.com.
Woodworth, Edwin B and Los Altos History House Museum. The Birth of a Town: A HistoricResource Manuscript. Los Altos, Calif
ATTACHMENT 2
252
Agenda Item # 8.
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Reviewed By:
City Manager City Attorney
GE
Finance Director
JH JF
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
Prepared by: Ben Fordham, Ecoshift environmental consultant Reviewed by: Laura Simpson, Interim Planning Director
Approved by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment:
1. Draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
2. Appendices
3. CEQA Initial Study
Initiated by:
Environmental Commission Subcommittee and Staff
Previous Council Consideration:
December 2013- CAP Adoption
Fiscal Impact:
See Appendix D
Environmental Review:
The adoption of the Climate Action and Adaptability Plan (the “CAAP”) is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and 15308 (Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment), in that the CAAP is a proposed series of policies and actions intended to address global warming, and it can be seen with certainty that those policies and actions will not have a significant environmental effect. On the contrary, the purpose of the CAAP is to protect the environment. Additionally, based upon an Initial Study prepared in connection with the CAAP, none of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.
Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:
• Does the City Council wish to approve the draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan? Summary:
• The City of Los Altos’ first Climate Action Plan was adopted in 2013 and set targets for GHG emission reductions by 2020
253
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 2
• Update to the 2013 CAP is a priority for City Council and the Environmental Commission • In January 2021, Staff and the Environmental Commission Subcommittee began work to update the 2013 CAP, now the 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) with the consultant • City Council provided feedback on the targets and actions proposed in the CAAP during the Study Session on November 4, 2021
• The CAAP 2022 proposes an overall target of Carbon Neutrality by 2035 254
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 3
Purpose
To have City Council approve the draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and Initial Study.
Background
It is unquestionable that CO2 levels are rising, and our earth is heating up. This is causing major changes in our weather patterns, leading to more extreme conditions and causing destruction that is becoming more frequent and intense. Los Altos is facing extreme drought, more frequent heatwaves, poor air quality and effects of wildfires. Los Altos is not insulated but part of a larger region and, if it is to maintain a healthy quality of life, urgent action is needed.
According to the most recent report from the IPCC, Earth has warmed 1.09℃ since 1850 and we’re on track to exceed 1.5℃ as early as 2025. Global surface temperature has increased faster since 1970 than any other 50-year period in the last 2,000 years. Today, CO2 concentrations are higher than at any time in the last 2 million years. Many changes such as glacier and artic sea ice melt leading to sea-level rise are now virtually irreversible. On a global level, solutions and action are crucial but local action is even more important in the face of global uncertainties. Los Altos must pursue the most effective solutions in order to reduce the negative impact. Los Altos has done a good job taking action to mitigate emissions produced locally but can and should do more. Because we are already facing the impact of climate change, this new plan includes a section on climate adaptation in order to prepare the City for the future impacts of climate change.
Rapid, aggressive action can make a difference. According to the IPCC “Strong and sustained reductions in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases could quickly make air quality better, and in 20 to 30 years global temperatures could stabilize.” Los Altos can meet this challenge and achieve carbon neutrality within the next 15 years. The actions developed for the CAAP will allow the City to significantly reduce GHG emissions by 2030 and will propel Los Altos toward carbon neutrality in the years that follow.
CAP 2013
In 2013 the City of Los Altos adopted the Climate Action Plan in accordance with State Assembly Bill 32 that required public agencies in California to implement measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to year 1990 levels by 2020. Cities were required to adopt a plan to address carbon emissions and establish an implementation plan for programs and facilities. A Climate Action Plan (CAP) is the policy document that provides the framework to achieve those goals. After the adoption of the 2013 CAP, two annual report updates were completed in 2015 and 2016.
The 2013 CAP set a target of reducing the community’s GHG by at least 15% by 2020. The GHG emission reduction measures were grouped into five focus areas:
255
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 4
Focus Area Potential Emissions
Reductionsby 2020
(MTCO2e)
Focus Area Percentage
ofTotal Reductions
1. Transportation -7,760 50%
2. Energy -5,740 37%
3. Resource Conservation -1,310 8%
4. Green Community -20 <1%
5. Municipal Operations -810 5%
Total -
15,640
100
%
The City was successful in achieving and exceeding the target set by the 2013 CAP and reduced emissions by 35% between 2005 and 2018. A large percentage of emission reductions came from joining Silicon Valley Clean Energy, but many other actions were also taken that combined to create a 35% reduction in emissions. Approximately 2,500 metric tons of CO2 were reduced through construction of new bike and pedestrian lanes, and approximately 2,400 metric tons were reduced through energy efficiencies. This shows the City is capable of reducing its emissions in a meaningful way.
CAAP 2022
The City Council and Environmental Commission prioritized the Climate Crisis and agreed that this is a priority for both the Council and the Commission. The City set aside a budget of $75,000 to contract with a consultant to update the 2013 CAP. After release of the RFP in Fall of 2020, the City contracted with EcoShift Consulting in December 2020 and in January 2021 key stakeholders were identified to develop the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) and lead staff began working on the project.
Lead Team
The Environmental Commission CAAP sub-committee members include Bruno Delagneau, Raashina Humayun and Don Weiden. The City Staff Leads and stakeholder groups are key to the development of the CAAP and will be instrumental to implement the future adopted plan.
CAAP City Staff Leads
• Chief Building Official
• Community Development Director and Planning Commission Liaison • Economic Development Coordinator
• City Manager
• Human Resources Analyst
• Emergency Preparation Coordinator
256
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 5
• Municipal Services Director
• Transportation Services Manager
• Public Information Officer
• Recreation & Community Svc. Director and Parks & Rec. Commission Liaison • Deputy City Manager
• Management Analyst Fellow
• Senior Commission Liaison
• Police Operations Captain
• Planning Services Manager and Planning Commission Liaison • Traffic Patterns and Complete Streets Commission Liaison • Engineering Services Director
• Human Resources Manager
• Youth Commission Liaison
CAAP Stakeholder Groups
• Los Altos Property Owners Downtown
• Los Altos Village Association (LAVA)
• Los Altos Chamber of Commerce
• GreenTown Los Altos
• Los Altos Youth Climate Action Team (LAYCAT)
• Los Altos High School Green Team
• Los Altos History Museum
• LAUSD Outdoor Educator
• Orchard Commons Committee
• BATS Block Action Team
• Grass Roots Ecology
• Los Altos Rotary Club
• Parks & Recreation Commission
• Youth Commission
• Complete Streets Commission
• Senior Commission
Outreach & Engagement
Given the modest budget, we worked with the Consultant to identify areas to conduct outreach and engagement within the budget and without increasing costs to the City. We were able to develop an outreach and engagement plan that included:
• Public Community Workshop (Business & General)
• June 28, 2021
• 63 registered
• Part A- Business, Part B- General Community
• Attendees provided feedback through live discussion, chat, and by email • Session recorded for those unable to attend (CAAP webpage) • Two Public Surveys (results of surveys: www.losaltosca.gov/caap) 257
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 6
• Developed by Environmental Commission Subcommittee and staff • Farmer’s Market tabling: Staff, Commission, Green Team/LAYCAT Volunteers
• Business Flyers
• Various social media, City Manager’s Weekly Updates, Town Crier • Three Stakeholder Focus Groups
• CAAP Webpage and dedicated email for updates and feedback • Environmental Commission Monthly Updates
Study Session
On November 4, 2021, the City Council received a report on the targets and actions proposed in the CAAP. City Council provided feedback and inquired about the details of the CAAP. The consultant, Environmental Commission Subcommittee and staff reviewed the feedback and prepared the following responses.
Question/Comment: Proposed Resolution:
1 Need to clarify why we use 2005 instead of
1990.
Action: Explanation added in the CAAP
2 How are GHG emissions calculated? Need to
reference and explain the methodology in the
plan.
Action: Created tables describing data sources and
calculation methods
3 More details on the Carbon Emission Permit.
Need to clarify the objectives, how the funds
are going to be used and also give a couple
options or ideas how this could be
implemented. Accounting for low-income or
seniors on fixed income is key to the
acceptance of the plan.
There are a few options to this action: Yearly fee can be based on Gas consumption (if we can have easy access
to data) with no payment for tier 1, a $50 fee for tier 2, $100 for 3 and $200 for 4 for example. Or it could be
done based on house square footage: $50 for <2,000,
$100 for 2,000 to 4000, $200 for >4,000. For people
renting, fee would be paid by owner (renters can’t
make structural changes). Exemption for people
making less than the low-income average for Santa
Clara County: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/grantsfunding/income-limits/state-and-federal-incomelimits/docs/income-limits-2020.pdf 258
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 7
The idea could include an opt out if homeowner is >65
or low income but then the home must be converted to
all electric 1) upon remodeling 2) upon sale, transfer or death of owners 3) upon securing financial assistance
for conversion (city or consultant to assist in process).
Action: Updated Actions List description
4 Need to clarify the goal of 10% of population in
multi-housing. What does it mean? What is the
% today? How does it compare to the required
increase in low income and multi-family
housing for Los Altos? The state mandate will
have 18% of Los Altos residents in low income
and multi-family housing according to council.
High-density housing doesn’t necessarily lead
to GHG reductions? TOD better?
4,500 people/square mile
High density is classified as 10k+/square mile (CAPA)
Based on 2023-2031 RHNA, Los Altos needs to add
1,958 housing units (789 low income or very low
income units) which would represent about 12% (18%
at 3/unit) of the population based on a low assumption
of 2 people per unit. 429 units are currently planned or in construction:
https://abag.ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2021- 07/2023-2031_RHNA_Appeal_City_of_Los_Altos.pdf
There are currently about 11,057 (11,418 according to
Civicdashboard) housing units in Los Altos.
5 10 minute walk from transit is a good goal, but
a state objective of 15 minute walk was
mentioned. Need to clarify and address this in
the plan.
15-minute city legislation was vetoed by the governor.
But the concept of a 15-minute city is different from
our core action. They are not mutually exclusive. Core
of action is 10-minute walk from transit (EV shuttle,
escooter/ebike, VTA)
Action: Updated to include in walkable/bikeable city
action; actions not mutually exclusive
6 Is the goal of 100% electrical housing
reasonable considering that there are challenges
meeting demand today. Are we going to limit
the sizes of houses?
The electrical grid of tomorrow will be different from
the grid of today and will be designed to accommodate
electrification. The goal of increasing energy efficiency by 20% along with strengthening solar panels
requirements in new homes and remodels (150 per year
expected) should go a long way to alleviate increased
demand. Current % of units with electric heating is
259
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 8
12% according to Census data.
Action: SVCE and Peninsula Clean Energy FAQ link
contains information and responses to many of the
questions about grid adequacy
https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/power-faq/
7 Need to explain what carbon neutral means. Action: Added definition in the CAAP 8 Can we accomplish these goals with the limited
budget and staff?
Current FTE needs = ~4-5 FTE for mitigation actions
Action: Schedule/prioritization will be key
9 Incentives were deemed to be key. Identify
areas where we can incentivize the proposed
electrification switch and where the money will
come from.
Action: Funding Sources and links are provided for
each action in the All Actions List in the CAAP
10 There were some questions about recycling
efficiency and the additional footprint of
electrification such as solar panels. Clarification
is needed specifically with regards to the 95%
diversion rate goal (as we know some diverted
materials will make their way back to the
landfill).
Including EPA info on solar panel recycling:
https://www.epa.gov/hw/solar-panel-recycling
Per MTWS: This type of waste is Special and/or
Hazardous and not currently allowed in the landfill,
therefore waste diversion rates should not be affected
Action: Ensure the City is informed on PV/battery endof-life; industries are controlled by state 11 We need to consider the Covid impact when we
lay out a schedule and implementation timeline.
(Specific to businesses)
Action: Delay business-related actions by 1 year. To be done on a case per case basis but most key actions may
not be active before 2023
12 What can the plan do to help residents become
greener? Can we lay out specific things that can
be done? Can we offer a couple “package”
options?
Build a webpage about electrification incentives.
Education around consumer choices, waste and
recycling, using alternative mode of transportation etc.
Action: Added a “What Can I Do” section in the CAAP
260
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 9
13 Need to have a priority order and specific
actions that the city can/should take to keep
things moving. Where do we need ordinances,
incentives, rethink the permit system etc.
Action: Prioritization ranking added to the CAAP
14 Monitoring will be key, and we should lay it
out in details in the plan. How often do we do
it?
Action: Addressed in the CAAP
15 Valley Water is responsible for flood control,
so what is the City’s role? How will the City
support Valley Waters actions?
Action: The City will coordinate with Valley Water
16 Concerns about the targets and wanting to be
successful in achieving them.
Action: Added a chart in CAAP
17 Recommends having a Priority Order explained
or detailed in the CAAP.
Action: Added prioritization ranking to the actions
18 Annual updates and accessing the progress is
necessary. Plan should include a timeline with
different check-in points.
Action: Implementation is addressed in the plan with
the timeline
19 What were the lessons learned from the 2013
CAP? What actions had the greatest impact?
Action: Added table with most impactful 2013 actions
added to CAAP
20 Nothing for fire risk? Action: Action List updated
Discussion/Analysis
The proposed targets in this CAAP aim to achieve an 85% reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve Carbon Neutrality by 2035. These are bold but achievable objectives. The implementation of all proposed CAAP strategies and actions by each sector will allow us to meet these 261
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 10
objectives. Note that Transportation and Energy are the two largest sectors in which the greatest reductions are needed and must be obtained.
Sectors for Action
The CAAP divides reduction strategies into the follow sectors:
• Transportation
• Energy
• Resource Conservation
• Green Community
• Municipal Operations
Transportation
Reducing GHG emissions from vehicle trips can be accomplished by providing safe and convenient alternatives to driving gas powered single-occupant vehicles and by ensuring that infrastructure is in place to support more efficient travel patterns. The strategies and actions identified in this focus area will reduce vehicle trips by increasing the number of bicycle, walking, ebike, escooter, or shared transit trips that residents and visitors make. Implementing the 2021 Complete Streets Master Plan, improving access and convenience of transit, and increasing the diversity of shared transportation options are key elements.
While some vehicle trips will remain necessary because of distance, timing, sequence, or other factors, Los Altos should support efforts by residents and visitors to use efficient means of transportation by developing an infrastructure network that supports electric vehicles (EVs).
Energy
Los Altos is comprised of mostly residential buildings, therefore community and energy use reduction and use of renewable energy is especially important to reduce GHG emissions in this sector. Joining Silicon Valley Clean Energy in 2017 greatly reduced emissions from the energy sector, GHG emissions from non-SVCE customers and from the burning of methane gas in buildings remains a major problem.
The strategies in this area address opportunities for residents and businesses to switch from nonrenewable energy sources to renewable ones, accelerate electrification of buildings, conserve energy, and maximize energy efficiency.
Resource Conservation
While waste disposal and water use, are all essential activities in the community, consuming and/or disposing of such resources generates community wide GHG emissions. The effects of these activities can be reduced by diverting more waste from the landfill, using and conserving water efficiently, and promoting sustainable consumption patterns. Implementing SB 1383 requirements to divert organic waste from landfills will assist the City with increasing diversion rates. 262
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 11
Green Community
Many projects in Los Altos contribute to an improved quality of life by providing economic, social, and environmental benefits for the community. These projects also indirectly reduce GHG emissions. While the measures and actions in this focus area identify only minor direct emissions reductions, they support the reduced energy or fuel consumption goals underlying numerous other CAAP strategies.
Municipal Operations
While City activities represent a small part of overall emissions in the community, the Municipal Operations focus area is the City’s opportunity to lead by example. Emissions reduction measures will also reduce the cost of City operations by decreasing energy, fuel, and other material consumption at City facilities.
Climate Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation
Senate Bill 379 requires local jurisdictions to address climate adaptation and resiliency strategies. The Vulnerability Assessment is the first step in Los Altos’ effort in planning for and adapting to climate change, outlined in Los Altos’ Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP). The climate vulnerability assessment identifies the risks that climate change poses and describes the changing frequency and intensity of climate hazards, and relies on resources provided by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) including Cal-Adapt and the California Adaptation Planning Guide. The Vulnerability Assessment is an appendix to the CAAP.
Santa Clara County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan The Santa Clara County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan is the county-wide hazard mitigation plan. The plan describes that the number and length of heat waves is expected to increase, how the timing and form of precipitation is expected to change stream flow,river flooding, and wildfire risk.
Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
The Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex is an addition to the Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan, specific to Los Altos. The Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex ranks natural hazards based on their probability and their impact. According to the Plan Annex, the hazards with the highest risk score (in order) is earthquake (48), severe weather (33), flood (18), drought (9), dam and levee failure (6), wildfire (3) and landslide (3).
Los Altos
The CAAP Task Force including Lead City staff and members of the Environmental Commission Subcommittee for the CAAP, guided the development. They understand the many aspects of Los Altos operations, planning, and environmental management.
The following climate-related events are identified as the primary hazards and frame the vulnerability assessment:
263
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 12
1. Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
2. Precipitation & Flooding
3. Wildfires & Air pollution
The Task group identified climate hazards of most concern in the future. Concerns were ranked (high, medium, low) for primary and secondary climate hazards. Primary climate hazards are phenomena that are climate variables. Temperature and precipitation define climate. Secondary climate hazards are hazards resulting from changes in primary climate hazards and how it relates to community sectors such as the natural environment, economy, and public.
The primary climate hazards identified in order of most concern was temperature increase, precipitation changes, and sea level rise. The secondary climate hazards identified in order of most concern was drought, extreme heat, wildfires, air pollution, flooding, and landslides.
Impacts on Los Altos’ Assets/Community Sectors
The CAAP Task Force assisted with identifying the natural and built assets, facilities, and what sectors of the economy were most important to Los Altos’ quality of life.
Natural Environment
The most important Los Altos’ quality of life benefits (results receiving 40% or more) in order of importance are:
1. Managed landscapes (yards, parks, street trees)
2. Air and air quality
3. Natural habitat (soil, plants, wildlife)
4. Creeks, rivers, and other water bodies
Built Environment
The most important to Los Altos’ quality of life benefit for the built environment (results receiving 40% or more) in order of importance:
1. Housing
2. Schools
3. Transportation (roads, sidewalks, buses, trains, parking spots & bike racks)
4. Utilities (power, drinking water, stormwater & sewer, natural gas, phone, internet) Vulnerable Populations
As part of the Vulnerability Assessment, it is important to identify the vulnerable populations that are most at risks to climate hazards.
264
Agenda Item # 9.
Subject: Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
February 8, 2022 Page 13
The vulnerable populations identified (in order of importance) include:
1. Elderly
2. People with chronic or pre-existing medical conditions
3. People with disabilities
4. Children
5. Indigenous and or people of color
6. People experiencing homelessness
Vulnerable populations often do not have access to the resources needed to mitigate health and safety impacts and may lack or have limited mobility. People with limited mobility and functionality during evacuation, flooding, and other events are at risk. People with chronic or pre-existing medical conditions, elderly and children are more at risk to develop health issues which could be exacerbated by poor air quality and extreme heat days. As experienced more recently with the COVID-19 pandemic, it is increasingly important to identify the vulnerable populations in the City and ensure that adaptation measures include resources to assist them during these events.
Recommendation
Staff is requesting that the City Council approve the draft Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and Initial prepared for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for environmental review compliance. 265
Agenda Item # 9.
CLIMATE ACTION &
ADAPTATION PLAN
2022
LOS ALTOS, CA
ATTACHMENT 1
266
Agenda Item # 9.
Mission
The mission of our Climate Action and
Adaptation Plan is to preserve the unique
character of Los Altos and enhance its natural
environment while improving the quality of
life and health of its people by supporting
transformative change in the areas of climate
action, resilience and equity.
Vision
“To place Los Altos on an accelerated,
sustainable path to carbon neutrality by
advancing bold and effective climate policies.”
2 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
267
Agenda Item # 9.
Executive
Summary
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 3 ATTACHMENT 1
268
Agenda Item # 9.
Executive Summary
Executive Summary Figure 1 Global Warming trends.
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, pg. SPM-7. (IPPC slide deck pg.6)
GLOBAL WARMING TRENDS
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Changes in global surface temperature relative to 1850-1900 Human influence has warmed the climate at a rate that is unprecedented in at least the last 2000 years
Call to Action
There is international consensus
on the science of climate change
and actions that must be taken
over the next few years to avoid
some of the potentially catastrophic
impacts on Earth and its ability to
sustain our current population and
civilization. The CAAP’s Introduction
section presents information on the
urgency of action and policies being
developed to address and adapt to
climate change locally, nationally and
internationally in just and equitable
ways. Executive Summary Figure 1
shows that warming of the planet is
unprecedented since the middle of
the 19th Century.
Our Impacts
An updated greenhouse gas
(GHG) inventory was conducted
to understand the current GHG
emissions of Los Altos and to
establish a baseline for the
forecasting and measuring of future
emissions. Executive Summary Figure
2 shows that approximately 96% of
Los Altos’ city-wide community GHG
emissions are from the use of fossil
fuels in the transportation and energy
sectors. To mitigate Los Altos’ impact
on climate change we must:
• Switch from fossil fuels to clean
renewable electrical energy in
our buildings and residences
• Reduce vehicle miles traveled
• Electrify transportation
• Increase walking, bicycling and
shared transportation in our
lives and work
Climate Impacts
A Vulnerability Assessment was
conducted to determine threats
Los Altos is likely to face from the
changing climate, as well as assess
the City’s preparedness and capacity
to address those threats. Los Altos
will experience increased heat
waves, floods, drought, and poor
air quality from regional events and
reverberations from the regional
impacts of climate change on the
natural environment, water supply
4 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 This Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP)
assesses the impacts of Los Altos on the climate,
how Los Altos can reduce its impact on the climate
and how Los Altos can adapt to the changing climate.
Executive Summary Figure 2 2018 City-wide emissions
°C
2018 CITY-WIDE EMISSIONS
TRANSPORTATION & MOBILE SOURCES
TRANSPORTATION &
MOBILE SOURCES
63,280
SOLID WASTE
2,653
COMMERCIAL
ENERGY
7,535
RESIDENTIAL
ENERGY
35,661
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
1,128 WATER &
WASTEWATER
1,063
WATER & WASTEWATER
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
COMMERCIAL ENERGY
RESIDENTIAL ENERGY
SOLID WASTE
ATTACHMENT 1
269
Agenda Item # 9.
Executive Summary CONTINUED
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 5 system, and the energy grid
on which we depend. Executive
Summary Figure 3 shows the
forecasted change in expected
temperatures in Los Altos. The
complete Vulnerability Assessment
is included as Appendix E.
Looking to 2050
To determine what the City’s
emissions might look like in 2050,
a series of emissions forecasts
were developed. First a BusinessAs-Usual (BAU) forecast was developed to estimate the City’s
emissions without any additional
action from Federal, State, or local
governments. The City’s Business
As-Usual emissions are expected to
increase from 111,320 metric tons
in 2018 to 116,346 metric tons in
2050. Executive Summary Figure 4
shows the results of the Cit’s BAU
forecast.
Executive Summary Figure 3
Annual average maximum temperatures in Los Altos (image from Cal-Adapt)
ANNUAL AVERAGE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE
Average of all the hottest daily temperatures in a year.
Executive Summary Figure 4 Business-as-usual forecast
0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
MTCO2e
BAU Forecast (2018 - 2050)
Transportation & Mobile Sources Residential Energy Commercial Energy Solid Waste Water & Wastewater Employee Commute
Vehicle Fleet Solid Waste Facilities Buildings & Facilities Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities Street Lights & Traffic Signals BAU FORECAST (2018-2050)
ATTACHMENT 1
270
Agenda Item # 9.
Emissions Timeline by Scenario (MTCO2e)
Scenario 20051 20181 20302 20352
BAU 184,725 - 112,670 113,650
ABAU -- 83,025 75,700
ABAU+Existing CAP '13 - 111,320 75,885 67,160
CAAP 2022 -- 25,835 3,144 1
Historic Data (data for 2006-2017 not available; 111,320 MTCO2e used as the baseline for all scenarios) 2 Projected data based on models
Executive Summary CONTINUED
6 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Executive Summary Figure 5 Adjusted business-as-usual forecast 0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
MTCO2e
Adjusted BAU Forecast (2018 - 2050)
Transportation & Mobile Sources Residential Energy Commercial Energy Solid Waste Water & Wastewater Vehicle Fleet
Employee Commute Solid Waste Facilities Buildings & Facilities Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities Street Lights & Traffic Signals To project the City’s emissions in 2050
including the expected impacts of
State and local actions, an Adjusted
Business-As-Usual (ABAU) forecast
was developed which includes
expected increases in fuel economy
and building energy efficiency in
California, increased EV adoption
in Los Altos specifically, and the
expected increase in air conditioning
use due to increased temperatures
related to climate change. This
forecast shows that, with the inclusion
of these additional factors, the City’s
emissions are expected to decline
from 111,320 metric tons in 2018 to
70,800 metric tons in 2050. Executive
Summary Figure 5 shows the results
of the City’s ABAU forecast.
Based on the current and forecasted
greenhouse gas emissions,
implementation of Los Altos’ 2013
Climate Action Plan, and guidance
from City government and the
community, the CAAP is based
on pursuing a goal of Carbon
Neutrality by 2035. Reducing
EMISSIONS TIMELINE BY SCENARIO (MTCO2e)
Executive Summary Table 1 Emissions Timeline by Scenario as many GHG emissions produced
by the City and its residents as
possible and sequestering the
remaining emissions through naturebased solutions, innovative carbon sequestration solutions, communitybased sequestration projects, and local carbon offsets will be required
to reach Carbon Neutrality by 2035.
After factoring in the impacts of the
2021 Reach Codes and 2013 CAP
actions not included or modified in
this update, we will need to reduce
our net emissions by an additional
60,000 metric tons by 2030 and
a further 15,000 metric tons by
2035 to reach our carbon neutrality
goal. Executive Summary Table
1 summarizes the historical and
projected emissions for Los Altos.
Strategic roadmap
To help Los Altos be more resilient
and carbon neutral, a roadmap of
Strategies, Goals and Actions was
developed. This roadmap defines the
actions, their schedule, estimated cost
and expected benefits. The roadmap
is broken into three sections:
• Greenhouse gas mitigation
strategies
• Climate adaptation strategies
• Cross-cutting strategies
(ones that deliver both
mitigation and adaptation
outcomes)
ADJUSTED BAU FORECAST (2018-2050)
ATTACHMENT 1
271
Agenda Item # 9.
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 MTCO2e
Emission Reductions by Focus Area
Transportation Energy Resource Conservation Municipal Operations -
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 MTCO2e
Emission Reductions by Focus Area
Transportation Energy Resource Conservation Municipal Operations Executive Summary CONTINUED
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 7 Executive Summary Figure 6 shows
the relationship of these three types
of strategies to each other. Some
of the strategies build on existing
efforts within Los Altos like the 2013
CAP, the 2018 Green Infrastructure
Stormwater Management Plan, or the
Complete Streets Master Plan. Most
are new strategies adopted or altered
from other California CAAPs and
programs beyond California. Others
were developed in discussion with
different stakeholders.
Through quantitative and qualitative
analysis, stakeholder engagement,
and survey of best practices, 68
actions were identified and prioritized.
The Strategic Roadmap section of
this plan contains a summary of
the proposed Strategies, Goals and
Actions grouped by Focus Area, as
well as the strategy development
process and a detailed description of
each action. Executive Summary Table
2 lists CAAP strategies by Focus Area.
Executive Summary Figure 7 shows
Los Altos’ forecasted pathway to
carbon neutrality by Focus Area. Note
that approximately 3,144 MTCO2e
remain in 2035 that will need to be
eliminated through the sequestration
solutions mentioned above.
The CAAP strategies entail
transforming the urban landscape
to make it more walkable, bikeable,
and livable; supporting green
transportation options; switching
to clean, renewable energy in our
buildings; reducing consumption
and waste; promoting green
infrastructure and nature-based
solutions; understanding and
reducing climate risks; and leading
through example by addressing
municipal operations.
Executive Summary Figure 6 Relationship between mitigation and adaptation actions
MITIGATION
ADDRESS
THE CAUSE
ADAPTATION
ADDRESS
THE IMPACTS
SUSTAINABLE
TRANSPORTATION
CLEAN
ENERGY
BUILDING
ELECTRIFICATION
WASTE
REDUCTION
BUILDING
WEATHERIZATION
SMART
GROWTH
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
DISASTER
PREPAREDNESS
RESTORATION OF
NATURE AREAS
EQUIP
COMMUNITIES FOR
EXTREME WEATHER
SEA LEVEL RISE
PROTECTION
WATER AND ENERGY
CONSERVATION
Executive Summary Table 2 Strategies by Focus Area
Strategies by Focus Area
Focus Area Strategies
Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035
Electrify Transportation
Electrify Off-Road Mobile Sources
Reduce Emissions from Energy Consumption
Facilitate Building Decarbonization
Increase Solar Energy Production
Resource Conservation Reduce Consumption and Waste
Operate Sustainable Municipal Buildings
Promote Green Municipal Practices
Reduce Municipal VMT
Integrate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Functions Green Community Develop Nature-Based Solutions
Climate Risk Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
Emergency Management Integrate Adaptation into Emergency Preparedness and Response Resilient Community Educate and Protect Residents
Transportation
Energy
Municipal Operations
STRATEGIES BY FOCUS AREA
Executive Summary Figure 7 Emissions reductions by Focus Area
EMISSION REDUCTIONS BY FOCUS AREA
ATTACHMENT 1
272
Agenda Item # 9.
8 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Executive Summary CONTINUED
Priority Actions
Because most of the CAAP actions
support or reinforce the objectives of
other actions, essentially all the CAAP
actions need to be implemented,
monitored, and achieved to reach
our goal of Carbon Neutrality by
2035. However, all actions cannot be
implemented at once. To assist policy
makers and staff in the allocation of
City resources:
• Each action includes a priority
rating (Priority 1 being the
highest)
• Each action includes an
assessment of the action’s CoBenefits (Cost Effectiveness, Community Benefits, Economic
Benefits, Aligns with State
and Local Policies, Promotes
Equity & Climate Justice)
• The final page of each action
Focus Area contains a timeline
for implementing the highest
priority actions within the
Focus Area.
A summary of key action items is
presented in the Priority Actions by
Focus Area section of the CAAP.
Implementing the CAAP
City policies and resources must
first be directed to Priority 1 Actions
in the Transportation and Energy
Focus Areas. The faster and larger
the GHG reductions made in these
Focus Areas, the better chance Los
Altos will have in meeting its Carbon
Neutrality goal. Progress on selected
Priority 1 Actions in the other Focus
Areas is important while maintaining
attention on Transportation and
Energy. Timelines for each action
are not specified in the CAAP for
several reasons. Available capital
investments budget, available staff,
secured outside funding, committed
community partnerships and
resident support for CAAP actions
will determine which and how many
Priority 1 Actions will be initiated and
maintained each year.
The CAAP contains detailed
information to assist Los Altos policy
makers and staff in prioritizing and
selecting actions including:
• Anticipated GHG reductions
for each action (Appendix D)
• Methods and assumptions
made in determining GHG
reductions, cost and staff
requirements (Appendix E)
• Recommended leaders,
partners, estimated cost and
potential funding sources and
programs (Appendix F)
• A general timeline, key
performance indicators and
performance monitoring
(Appendix G)
Maintaining flexibility in
implementing the CAAP will be
important. As technologies, business
models, funding and political will
evolve, Los Altos will need to
remain flexible in when and how it
implements the actions in the CAAP.
Los Altos must evaluate and adjust
course as necessary.
Monitoring & Reporting
Although actions may have different
milestones to completion and
benchmarks of success, monitoring
and reporting allow implementation
to be evaluated and tracked by
City departments, elected officials,
and the public. Monitoring the
progress towards goals and reporting
on results is a critical step in
implementing the CAAP.
As progress towards key targets is
tracked, Los Altos may need to scale
up or down its efforts depending
on the results observed. The City
should update the CAAP in 2025
and 2030, and report every two
years on greenhouse gas emissions
and progress towards goals. For
monitoring and evaluation of
adaptation actions, the City should
conduct a debrief within one year of
all hazardous events such as floods,
wildfires, and severe air pollution,
then adjust actions as necessary
based on those findings. The City’s
Environmental Commission should be
able to update the CAAP during its
life cycle.
Conclusion
The goals of this plan are to set
the City on a path towards carbon
neutrality and climate resilience.
The goals are ambitious, but
ones that we believe we can
achieve. If we achieve these
goals - carbon neutrality, equity,
sustainability, resilience - we will
create a community that is healthy,
connected, and vibrant. Please
fully participate in implementing
this CAAP, and see Appendix A
presenting personal actions, entitled
“What Can I Do Now?" to find
suggestions for simple actions each
individual can take to help.
ATTACHMENT 1
273
Agenda Item # 9.
Contents
15 LETTER
FROM THE
MAYOR
The Los Altos
community has
worked together
to shape this vision
through 2035.
21 EQUITY
AND
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
It's important for
the City to reduce
its emissions so as
to not adversely
affect vulnerable
communities
03 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
Los Altans have
been planning for
the sustainable use
of energy, waste,
water and land
resources.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 9 ● LIST OF FIGURES 11
● LIST OF TABLES 12
● ACRONYMS 13
● ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 14
● INTRODUCTION 16
▶▶▶ CALL TO ACTION 17
▶▶▶ BACKGROUND 19
▶▶▶ POLICY BACKDROP 19
▶▶▶ ALIGNMENT WITH CITY 21
PLANS AND POLICIES
▶▶▶ DEVELOPING THE CAAP 21
▶▶▶ EQUITY AND CLIMATE JUSTICE 21
● OUR IMPACTS 22
● CLIMATE IMPACTS 27
● LOOKING TO 2050 30
● STRATEGIC ROADMAP 33
▶▶▶ DEVELOPMENT AND METHODOLOGY 35
▶▶▶ MITIGATION STRATEGIES 36
■ FOCUS AREA 1 37
TRANSPORTATION
■ FOCUS AREA 2 44
ENERGY
■ FOCUS AREA 3 51
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
■ FOCUS AREA 4 54
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
▶▶▶ CROSS-CUTTING STRATEGIES 58
■ FOCUS AREA 5 61
GREEN COMMUNITY
■ FOCUS AREA 6 64
CLIMATE RISK
▶▶▶ CLIMATE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES 68
■ FOCUS AREA 7 69
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
■ FOCUS AREA 8 73
RESILIENT COMMUNITY
ATTACHMENT 1
274
Agenda Item # 9.
Contents
93 CONCLUSION
The ambitious goals of this plan are to set the
City on a path towards carbon neutrality and
climate resilience.
10 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 APPENDIX A 96
“WHAT CAN I DO NOW?” GUIDE
APPENDIX B 98
CAAP FACT SHEET
APPENDIX C 103
GLOSSARY
APPENDIX D 105
ACTIONS LIST
APPENDIX E 109
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
APPENDIX F 115
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS,
COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX G 122
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
AND KPIs
APPENDIX H 127
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
● PRIORITY ACTIONS
● IMPLEMENTING THE CAAP
▶▶▶ IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
▶▶▶ BUDGET
▶▶▶ IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
▶▶▶ MONITORING & REPORTING
■ MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING
■ ADAPTATION MONITORING & REPORTING
▶▶▶ ALIGNMENT WITH FUNDING RESOURCES
■ FUNDING IMPLEMENTATION
■ MITIGATION FUNDING SOURCES
■ ADAPTATION FUNDING SOURCES
▶▶▶ A NOTE ON CONSUMPTION-BASED INVENTORIES
▶▶▶ CONCLUSION
76 77
78 79
84 85
85 85
86 87
88 91
93 94
UNDER SEPARATE COVER
ATTACHMENT 1
275
Agenda Item # 9.
List of Figures
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 11 ▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 1 4
Global Warming trends
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 2 4
2018 City-wide emissions
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 3 5
Annual average maximum
temperatures in Los Altos
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 4 5
Business-as-usual forecast
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 5 6
Adjusted business-as-usual forecast
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 6 7
Relationship between mitigation
and adaptation actions
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FIGURE 7 7
Emissions reductions by Focus Area
▶▶▶ FIGURE 1 17
Global Warming trends
▶▶▶ FIGURE 2 18
The Five-Step Climate
Action Planning Process
▶▶▶ FIGURE 3 19
Impacts of Climate Change
▶▶▶ FIGURE 4 21
Achieving carbon neutrality
▶▶▶ FIGURE 5 26
2005 Government emissions sources
▶▶▶ FIGURE 6 26
2005 Community emissions sources
▶▶▶ FIGURE 7 26
2018 Government emissions sources
▶▶▶ FIGURE 8 26
2018 Community emissions sources
▶▶▶ FIGURE 9 28
Annual average maximum
temperatures in Los Altos
▶▶▶ FIGURE 10 28
Changes to the water cycle
due to climate change
▶▶▶ FIGURE 11 29
Changes to the water cycle due
to climate change continued
▶▶▶ FIGURE 12 31
Business-as-usual forecast
▶▶▶ FIGURE 13 31
Adjusted business-as-usual forecast
▶▶▶ FIGURE 14 32
Emissions reductions by Focus Area
▶▶▶ FIGURE 15 34
Relationship between mitigation
and adaptation actions
▶▶▶ FIGURE 16 35
CAAP Focus Areas
▶▶▶ FIGURE 17 37
Life cycle GHG emissions of passenger
car segment gasoline ICEVs, PHEVs,
BEVs, and FCEVs registered in the
United States in 2021
▶▶▶ FIGURE 18 78
Mainstreaming climate investments
▶▶▶ FIGURE 19 86
Funding options hierarchy
▶▶▶ FIGURE 20 93
Consumption-based inventories explained
ATTACHMENT 1
276
Agenda Item # 9.
List of Tables
12 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE 1 6
Emissions Timeline by Scenario
▶▶▶ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE 2 7
Strategies by Focus Area
▶▶▶ TABLE 1 20
Relevant State policies affecting
climate planning in California
▶▶▶ TABLE 2 23
Greenhouse gas inventory
data sources
▶▶▶ TABLE 3 24
Emissions comparison table
▶▶▶ TABLE 4 25
Most impactful GHG reducing
actions from 2013 CAP
▶▶▶ TABLE 5 32
Emissions by Scenario
(2030 & 2035)
▶▶▶ TABLE 6 80
Mitigation Budget
▶▶▶ TABLE 7 82
Cross-Cutting Budget
▶▶▶ TABLE 8 83
Adaptation Budget
▶▶▶ TABLE 9 87
Local funding mechanisms
▶▶▶ TABLE 10 88
Mitigation funding sources
▶▶▶ TABLE 11 91
Adaptation funding sources
ATTACHMENT 1
277
Agenda Item # 9.
ABAG
Association of Bay Area
Governments
ABAU
Adjusted Business-As-Usual
ADU
Accessory Dwelling Unit
BAAQMD
Bay Area Air Quality
Management District
BAU
Business-As-Usual
CAAP
Climate Action and Adaptation
Plan
CAP
(2013) Climate Action Plan
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CBI
Consumption-Based Inventory
CCA
Community Choice Aggregation
CSMP
Complete Streets Master Plan
DCFC
Direct Current Fast Charger
EC
Environmental Commission
EV
Electric Vehicle
EVSE
Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment
FEMA
Federal Emergency
Management Agency
Acronyms
FIRM
Flood Insurance Rate Map
GHG
Greenhouse Gas
GWP
Global Warming Potential
HVAC
Heating, Ventilation and
Air Conditioning
ICLEI
International Council for Local
Environmental Initiatives
IPCC
Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change
MTC
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission
MTCO2e
Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide
Equivalent
NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
OES
California Office of
Emergency Services
OPR
California Office of Planning
and Research
PSPS
Public Safety Power Shutoff
RCP
Representative Concentration
Pathway
SB 379
California Senate Bill No. 379
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 13 SVCE
Silicon Valley Clean Energy
VA
Vulnerability Assessment
VMT
Vehicle Miles Traveled
UWMP
Utility Water Master Plan
ZNE
Zero Net Energy
ATTACHMENT 1
278
Agenda Item # 9.
CITY COUNCIL
Anita Enander
Mayor
Sally Meadows
Vice Mayor
Neysa Fligor
Councilmember
Lynette Lee Eng
Councilmember
Jonathan Weinberg
Councilmember
ENVIRONMENTAL
COMMISSION
Bruno Delagneau
(CAAP subcommittee)
Raashina Humayun
(CAAP subcommittee)
Don Weiden
(CAAP subcommittee)
Laura Teksler
Shiao-ping Lu
David Klein
Lei Yuan
CITY OF LOS ALTOS
COUNCIL LIAISON
Sally Meadows
Neysa Fligor
CITY OF LOS ALTOS
SUSTAINABILITY
COORDINATORS
Emiko Ancheta
Laura Simpson
CAAP
TASK FORCE
Kirk Ballard
Building Official
Jon Biggs
Community Development Director
Anthony Carnesecca
Economic Development Coordinator
Jamie Chew
Recreation Manager
Ann Hepenstal
Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
Manny Hernandez
Municipal Services Director
Jennifer Leal
Human Resources Manager
Donna Legge
Recreation and Community
Services Director
Scott McCrossin
Captain of Police
Guido Persicone
Design Review Commission Liaison
Jim Sandoval
Engineering Services Director
COMMUNITY
PARTNERS
GreenTown Los Altos
Los Altos Property Owners Downtown
Los Altos Village Association
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce
LAYCAT
(Los Altos Youth Climate
Action Team)
Los Altos High School
(Green Team Student Club)
Los Altos History Museum
LAUSD Outdoor Educator
Orchard Commons Committee
BATS Block Action Team
Grass Roots Ecology
Los Altos Rotary Club
Parks & Recreation
Commission Liaison
Youth Commission Liaison
Complete Streets Commission Liaison
Senior Commission Liaison
THANKS TO
Abby Young
BAAQMD
Louie Pellegrini,
Mission Trail Waste Systems
Shruti Mukhtyar,
UC Berkeley, College of Natural
Resources
Kasmira Kit
California Governor’s Office
of Emergency Services
Rebecca Lucky
City of Menlo Park
CONSULTANTS
EcoShift Consulting
Fehr & Peers
Urban Planning Partners
Baseline Environmental Consulting
Acknowledgments
14 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
279
Agenda Item # 9.
Letter from Mayor Enander
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 15 California has a long history of
variable climate, drought, and
wildfires. The impact of human
activity is profound, and, together
with the continued population growth
expected in the Bay Area, compels us
to act to mitigate those impacts.
The health and safety of our
residents must be foremost in the
actions of local government. We face
several immediate needs. We must
improve water conservation and find
better ways to manage that precious
resource. Rising sea level will
impact our storm- and wastewater
treatment systems and compel us
to work cooperatively with the City
of Palo Alto on changes needed
to keep our shared wastewater
treatment plant functioning. Because
a single wildland fire can negate
the substantial positive actions
on carbon reduction, we must
encourage proper management
of adjacent wildlands and prevent
the spread of fire into our city. In
planning for significant population
growth as mandated by the State
of California, new ways to work
and to commute are key to making
continued progress on reducing
GHG emissions. Increasing our tree
canopy and enhancing our green
spaces are essential strategies for
mitigating temperature increases
and sequestering carbon.
This Climate Action and Adaptation
Plan documents the tremendous
progress Los Altos has made
since 2005, having achieved a 40
percent reduction in GHG against
a target of 15 percent reduction.
Our success is attributable in
the government sector largely
to changes in work schedule/
commute and to adoption of efficient
lighting and energy consumption
in city buildings. Notable in this
effort was the opening of our new
Community Center, built to LEED
Gold standard. The Center provides
an incredible community resource
that demonstrates the possibilities
with sustainable construction and
operation. Our community also
contributed with huge reductions
from changes in transportation
and energy, the latter resulting
substantially from the move to
sustainable energy production
through Silicon Valley Clean Energy.
The combination of mitigation and
adaptation strategies recommended
in the CAAP show the breadth of
actions needed for the future. The
plan wisely shows that both strategies
are needed as we strive to reduce
our adverse impacts and adapt to
changes we cannot directly control.
The Los Altos community has
worked together to shape this vision
through 2035. City government
can lead some efforts, but many
depend on the actions of individual
residents. Only through the
combined actions of both can we
achieve the goals set out here.
Los Altos has demonstrated it can
achieve what we, as a community,
want to achieve. There is something
here for each of us to contribute to
creating a healthy, environmentally
sustainable community.
ATTACHMENT 1
280
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction DRAFT
16 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
281
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 17
CALL TO ACTION
The citizens and government of Los
Altos have a long history of bold and
forward-looking climate action. Since
the adoption of the City’s first Green
Building Ordinance in 2007, Los Altans
have been planning for the sustainable
use of energy, waste, water and land
resources. In 2013, Los Altos’ first
Climate Action Plan was released,
calling for a 15% reduction in GHG
emissions by 2020 as compared
to 2005 levels. This update to the
City's Climate Action Plan includes
an adaptation section to prepare for
the local impacts of climate change
and represents the next step in the
journey towards a sustainable, healthy,
equitable future.
The next few years are incredibly
important in limiting global
temperature increase to 1.5°C and
avoiding the most catastrophic
impacts of climate change. As Figure
1 shows, warming of the planet is
unprecedented since the middle
of the 19th Century, and has been
accelerating since the 1950s. As of
2020, the planet has already warmed
by 1.1°C1. Figure 3 shows the impacts
this warming has already had on our
planet. By 2030 global emissions need
to be halved, and carbon neutrality
achieved before 2050. The longer
we wait to take action, change will
become increasingly expensive and will
eventually be impossible.
According to the most recent report
from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC), the Earth
has warmed 1.09°C since 1850
and many changes such as sealevel rise and glacier and arctic ice melt are now virtually irreversible1.
Global temperatures are likely to
increase to a total of 1.5°C by the
mid-2040's which will further stress
our environmental systems and
result in Los Altos experiencing more
1 IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K.
Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press. frequent and more intense heat
waves, winter floods, drought and
wildfire air pollution events. On a
global level, we are rushing to find
solutions, but the most effective
solutions that will be developed
are at the local level. Although Los
Altos has taken action to mitigate
emissions produced locally, we can
do more and need to do more.
Here in Los Altos, we are already
Figure 1 Global Warming trends
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, pg. SPM-7.
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Changes in global surface temperature relative to 185
Human influence has warmed the climate at
unprecedented in at least the last 2000 year
GLOBAL WARMING TRENDS
ATTACHMENT 1
282
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction CONTINUED
18 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 facing periods of severe drought,
heat waves, and poor air quality
more frequently. We’ve seen wildfires
in the hills and the air darkened with
smoke. We are not insulated. While
some responses will need to be
coordinated regionally, it is important
for Los Altos to take quick and
effective action locally if we want to
maintain our quality of life. The good
news is that strong and sustained
transition from combustion engines
and moving away from methane
gas for heating our buildings could
quickly make air quality better and in
20 to 30 years global temperatures
could stabilize.
A five-step Climate Action Planning
process was described in the 2013
CAP, which has been followed here and
is shown in Figure 2. By including a
Vulnerability Assessment and climate
adaptation strategies in this plan, the
City now has a comprehensive set of
actions designed to both reduce our
greenhouse gas emissions and prepare
our community for the future impacts
of climate change. This updated Climate
Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), will
help guide the City’s actions into the
coming decade and beyond.
In the end, we believe Los Altos can
achieve its climate goals within the
next 15 years if we take an aggressive
approach. Following the guidance
in this plan, we need to commit
wholeheartedly to these actions
and get them underway as soon as
possible. To guide this effort, the
City has developed these Vision and
Mission statements.
VISION
“To place Los Altos on an accelerated,
sustainable path to carbon neutrality
by advancing bold and effective
climate policies.”
MISSION
“The mission of our Climate Action
and Adaptation Plan is to preserve
the unique character of Los Altos
and enhance its natural environment
while improving the quality of life and
health of its people by supporting
transformative change in the areas of
climate action, resilience and equity.”
Figure 2 The Five-Step Climate Action Planning Process
T H E F I V E - S T E P C L I M AT E A C T I O N
PLANNING PROCESS
1 INVENTORY
EMISSIONS
2 ESTABLISH A
REDUCTION
TARGET
3 ADOPT
MEASURES
TO ACHIEVE
TARGET
4 IMPLEMENT
MEASURES
5 EVALUATE
PROGRESS
ATTACHMENT 1
283
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction CONTINUED
Figure 3 The impacts of climate change.
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group 1– The Physical Science Basis presentation, slides 9.
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Highest
in at least
2 million years
CO2
concentration
Sea level
rise
Glaciers
retreat
Arctic sea ice
area
Fastest rates
in at least
3000 years
Lowest level
in at least
1000 years
Unprecedented
in at least
2000 years
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 19
BACKGROUND
The City’s 2013 Climate Action Plan
was designed to serve as a guiding
document towards GHG reductions,
both in municipal operations and
community-wide. It was designed
as a comprehensive strategy to
reduce emissions in a manner
consistent with state guidelines and
regulations, and to identify costeffective opportunities for existing and future residents, businesses,
and development projects for a more
sustainable community. At the same
time, the CAP provided a framework
for environmental leadership and
an educational resource to the
community.
This update provides a pathway
to the City’s bolder GHG reduction
target, as well as a framework for
a climate-resilient community. The
goals of this CAAP are:
• Reduce greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions
• Increase climate resilience
(SB 379 compliance)
• Demonstrate leadership
The Los Altos Sustainability
Coordinator and Environmental
Commission (EC) oversaw the
development of the CAAP. In
addition, a City-led climate Task
Force made up of department
heads and City employees was
assembled to provide expert input
and guidance. Together, these
groups helped ensure the CAAP is
realistic, feasible, and relevant to
the residents of Los Altos.
IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
POLICY BACKDROP
There are many international,
national, State, and local policies
and regulations designed to affect
climate change and sustainability,
and this CAAP was developed with
those policies and regulations as a
guide. This way, the City ensures
it’s doing its part to help meet
larger-scale goals and support
science-based targets. By developing
the Vulnerability Assessment and
Adaptation Framework included in
this plan, the City also helps meet
its SB 379 compliance requirements.
Table 1 describes the most relevant
State policies affecting climate
action planning for cities.
ATTACHMENT 1
284
Agenda Item # 9.
Table 1 Relevant State policies affecting climate planning in California.
STATE POLICIES
Introduction CONTINUED
20 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Legislation Year Name Description
AB 32 2006 CA Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006
Requires CARB to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas
emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse
gas emissions levels in 1990 to be achieved by 2020.
SB 32 2016 CA Global Warming Solutions Act:
emissions limit
Requires CARB to ensure that statewide greenhouse gas
emissions are reduced to 40% below the 1990 level by
2030.
EO B-55-18 2018 Executive Order to Achieve Carbon
Neutrality Calls for carbon neutrality by 2045.
EO B-16-12 2012 ZEV Mandate Requires State agencies to facilitate the rapid commercialization of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs).
EO B-30-15 2015 Executive Order to Achieve Carbon
Neutrality
Sets interim target of greenhouse gas emissions 40% less than 1990 levels by 2030.
AB 1493 (Pavley I) 2002 Automobile Emission Standards State law requiring the first set of greenhouse gas emission standards for passenger vehicles.
SB 379 2015 Climate Adaptation and Resiliency
Strategy
Requires all cities and counties to include climate
adaptation and resiliency strategies in the safety
elements of their general plans.
SB 350 2015 Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction
Act of 2015
Requires electricity providers, investor-owned utilities, and CCAs to increase their procurement of renewable
generated electricity to 50% by 2030.
SB 100 2018 CA Renewables Portfolio Standard Sets a target of 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2045.
SB 1383 2016 Short-Lived Climate Pollutant
Reduction Strategy
Legislation requiring reductions in emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (like methane) by 40-50% below 2013
levels by 2030.
AB 398 2017 Law extending California’s cap-and-trade program through 2030
SB 535 2012 Legislation requiring the state to direct at least 25% of state cap-and-trade revenues to go to projects that
SB 375 2008 Sustainable Communities and Climate
Protection Act
Directs CARB to set regional targets for GHG reductions from passenger vehicles
SB 743 2013 Updates the way transportation impacts are measured in California for new development projects
Executive Order Establishing 2030
Emissions Target
state cap-and-trade revenues to go to projects that
benefit disadvantaged communities
Legislation Year Name Description
AB 32 2006 CA Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006
Requires CARB to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas
emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse
gas emissions levels in 1990 to be achieved by 2020.
SB 32 2016 CA Global Warming Solutions Act:
emissions limit
Requires CARB to ensure that statewide greenhouse gas
emissions are reduced to 40% below the 1990 level by
2030.
EO B-55-18 2018 Executive Order to Achieve Carbon
Neutrality Calls for carbon neutrality by 2045.
EO B-16-12 2012 ZEV Mandate Requires State agencies to facilitate the rapid commercialization of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs).
EO B-30-15 2015 Executive Order to Achieve Carbon
Neutrality
Sets interim target of greenhouse gas emissions 40% less than 1990 levels by 2030.
AB 1493 (Pavley I) 2002 Automobile Emission Standards State law requiring the first set of greenhouse gas emission standards for passenger vehicles.
SB 379 2015 Climate Adaptation and Resiliency
Strategy
Requires all cities and counties to include climate
adaptation and resiliency strategies in the safety
elements of their general plans.
SB 350 2015 Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction
Act of 2015
Requires electricity providers, investor-owned utilities, and CCAs to increase their procurement of renewable
generated electricity to 50% by 2030.
SB 100 2018 CA Renewables Portfolio Standard Sets a target of 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2045.
SB 1383 2016 Short-Lived Climate Pollutant
Reduction Strategy
Legislation requiring reductions in emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (like methane) by 40-50% below 2013
levels by 2030.
AB 398 2017 Law extending California’s cap-and-trade program through 2030
SB 535 2012 Legislation requiring the state to direct at least 25% of state cap-and-trade revenues to go to projects that
SB 375 2008 Sustainable Communities and Climate
Protection Act
Directs CARB to set regional targets for GHG reductions from passenger vehicles
SB 743 2013 Updates the way transportation impacts are measured in California for new development projects
ATTACHMENT 1
285
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction CONTINUED
Figure 4 Achieving carbon neutrality
HOW TO ACHIEVE CARBON NEUTRALITY
DECARBONIZE GENERATE SEQUESTER
CO2
CO2
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 21
ALIGNMENT WITH CITY
PLANS AND POLICIES
The CAAP was designed to be
consistent with the City’s General
Plan and other relevant planning
documents, including the Complete
Streets Master Plan, Downtown Vision,
Emergency Operations Plan, Green
Stormwater Infrastructure Masterplan
and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. This
document builds off the policies and
programs in those plans.
In addition, the CAAP must be
updated periodically to remain
consistent with updates to the City’s
General Plan Elements and other
plan and policy updates.
DEVELOPING THE CAAP
The CAAP was developed through a
multi-stakeholder process involving
the Los Altos Environmental
Commission, heads of City Divisions
and Departments, and the public.
Community input and feedback were
crucial to the climate action and
adaptation planning process, and
the City conducted a robust outreach
and engagement process to solicit
input and feedback. The City hosted a
series of focus groups and workshops,
administered surveys, and embarked
on a public education campaign
through existing communication
channels. Feedback from the focus
groups, surveys, and community
workshop showed that most Los
Altos residents are concerned about
the effects of climate change and
support climate action, with 74% of
respondents saying they were very
concerned about climate change.
Based on the City’s current
and forecasted greenhouse gas
emissions, guidance from City
government, and community input,
the City has elected to pursue a goal
of Carbon Neutrality by 2035.
This will entail reducing as many
emissions as possible produced
by the City and its residents,
sequestering as many remaining
emissions as possible through
nature-based solutions, and utilizing
innovative carbon sequestration
solutions, community-based
sequestration projects, and local
carbon offsets to reach zero net
emissions. A bold goal aligns us with
the latest science and puts us on a
path for a sustainable, equitable,
healthy future. Figure 4 displays
the steps needed to achieve carbon
neutrality.
EQUITY AND
CLIMATE JUSTICE
Equity and climate justice are
important considerations as the City
sets about pursuing its goals. There
are several populations within Los
Altos that are more vulnerable to the
effects of climate, including:
• Senior citizens
• Children
• Individuals with
mobility issues
• Individuals with
language barriers
• Day workers
• Homeless populations
• Individuals with chronic
respiratory or heart
conditions
It’s also important to note that the
impacts of climate change are not
evenly distributed. Globally, the
effects of air and water pollution,
extreme heat, and sea level rise fall
disproportionately on disadvantaged
communities who are largely not
responsible for creating the majority
of the GHG emission. Therefore, it's
important for the City to reduce its
emissions so as to not adversely
affect these communities.
ATTACHMENT 1
286
Agenda Item # 9.
Our
Impacts
22 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
287
Agenda Item # 9.
Our Impacts
2018 DATA SOURCES
Table 2 Greenhouse gas inventory data sources
Data Sources
Community sector Activity Data Units Sources
Residential electricity 80,391,486 kWh SVCE, PG&E
Residential natural gas 6,640,225 therms PG&E
Commercial electricity 58,760,342 kWh SVCE, PG&E
Commercial natural gas 1,329,206 therms PG&E
On-Road transportation 166,865,877 VMT SVCE
Off-Road transportation 6,725 MTCO2e SVCE
Municipal solid waste 9,273 tons MTWS, R3
Water energy 5,596,927 kWh Cal Water
Wastewater electricity 2,257 kWh City of Palo Alto
Wastewater natural gas 9,794,797 scf City of Palo Alto
Government sector Activity Data Units Sources
Electricity use 4,634,143 kWh SVCE
Natural gas use 25,355 therms PG&E
Street lighting 220,386 kWh SVCE
Traffic control 56,891 kWh SVCE
Fleet fuel use 39,679 gallons City of Los Altos
Employee commutes 1,599,147 VMT City of Los Altos
Municipal solid waste 278 tons MTWS, R3
Water energy 12,970 kWh Cal Water
Wastewater energy 724 therms City of Palo Alto
Process & fugitive emissions 0.013 metric tons Scaled based on population growth
COMMUNITY SECTOR ACTIVITY DATA UNITS SOURCES
GOVERNMENT SECTOR ACTIVITY DATA UNITS SOURCES
Data Sources
Community sector Activity Data Units Sources
Residential electricity 80,391,486 kWh SVCE, PG&E
Residential natural gas 6,640,225 therms PG&E
Commercial electricity 58,760,342 kWh SVCE, PG&E
Commercial natural gas 1,329,206 therms PG&E
On-Road transportation 166,865,877 VMT SVCE
Off-Road transportation 6,725 MTCO2e SVCE
Municipal solid waste 9,273 tons MTWS, R3
Water energy 5,596,927 kWh Cal Water
Wastewater electricity 2,257 kWh City of Palo Alto
Wastewater natural gas 9,794,797 scf City of Palo Alto
Government sector Activity Data Units Sources
Electricity use 4,634,143 kWh SVCE
Natural gas use 25,355 therms PG&E
Street lighting 220,386 kWh SVCE
Traffic control 56,891 kWh SVCE
Fleet fuel use 39,679 gallons City of Los Altos
Employee commutes 1,599,147 VMT City of Los Altos
Municipal solid waste 278 tons MTWS, R3
Water energy 12,970 kWh Cal Water
Wastewater energy 724 therms City of Palo Alto
Process & fugitive emissions 0.013 metric tons Scaled based on population growth LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 23 The City’s 2013 Climate Action Plan
detailed 41 actions which, taken
together, were designed to reduce
emissions 15% by 2020 compared
to 2005 levels. 1990 is the baseline
year used by the State of California,
but as municipalities often lack highquality data going this far back, 2005 is often chosen as the baseline year.
The progress of these actions was
tracked and, to date, we have begun
or fully implemented 29 actions and
designated two other actions for
future implementation. Some actions
were deemed infeasible and have
either been revisited for this update
or removed from the list.
An updated greenhouse gas
inventory was conducted as part of
this update, the purpose of which
was to understand the present
state of environmental impacts
and to establish a baseline for the
forecasting of future emissions. Los
Altos’ 2018 inventory is actually
composed of two inventories, one
for the community and one for
municipal operations. ICLEI - Local
Governments For Sustainability
provides protocols for both, which
were used for these inventories. Table
2 describes the activity data and
sources of data used. Details of the
data, methodology and calculations
used in the 2018 inventory can be
found in Appendix E.
Scaled based on households growth
ATTACHMENT 1
288
Agenda Item # 9.
Our Impacts CONTINUED
Table 3 Emissions comparison table
EMISSIONS COMPARISON TABLE
GOVERNMENT SECTOR 2005 EMISSIONS 2018 EMISSIONS % CHANGE EMISSIONS REDUCTION (MTCO2e) COMMUNITY SECTOR 2005 EMISSIONS 2018 EMISSIONS % CHANGE EMISSIONS REDUCTION (MTCO2e) TOTAL
2020 TARGET
184,725 111,320 -40%
155,410 -15%
73,405
43,660
Emissions Comparison table
Government sector 2005 emissions 2018 emissions % change Emissions reduction (MTCO2e) Buildings & Facilities 428 134 -69% 294
Street Lights & Traffic Signals 130 <1 100% 130
Vehicle Fleet 420 351 -16% 69
Employee Commute 697 445 -36% 252
Solid Waste Facilities 197 172 -13% 25
Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities 5 3 67% (2)
Process & Fugitive Emissions 20 21 5% (1)
Government total 1,895 1,128 -40% 767
Community sector 2005 emissions 2018 emissions % change Emissions reduction (MTCO2e) Transportation & Mobile Sources 96,610 63,280 -34% 33,330 Solid Waste 3,950 2,653 -33% 1,297
Water & Wastewater 2,250 1,063 -53% 1,187
Commercial Energy 20,070 7,535 -62% 12,535
Residential Energy 59,950 35,661 -41% 24,289
Community total 182,830 110,192 -40% 72,638
Total 184,725 111,320 -40% 73,405
2020 target 155,410 -15% 43,660
Emissions Comparison table
Government sector 2005 emissions 2018 emissions % change Emissions reduction (MTCO2e) Buildings & Facilities 428 134 -69% 294
Street Lights & Traffic Signals 130 <1 100% 130
Vehicle Fleet 420 351 -16% 69
Employee Commute 697 445 -36% 252
Solid Waste Facilities 197 172 -13% 25
Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities 5 3 67% (2)
Process & Fugitive Emissions 20 21 5% (1)
Government total 1,895 1,128 -40% 767
Community sector 2005 emissions 2018 emissions % change Emissions reduction (MTCO2e) Transportation & Mobile Sources 96,610 63,280 -34% 33,330 Solid Waste 3,950 2,653 -33% 1,297
Water & Wastewater 2,250 1,063 -53% 1,187
Commercial Energy 20,070 7,535 -62% 12,535
Residential Energy 59,950 35,661 -41% 24,289
Community total 182,830 110,192 -40% 72,638
Total 184,725 111,320 -40% 73,405
2020 target 155,410 -15% 43,660
24 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 As Table 3 shows, emissions were
reduced from 184,725 metric tons
in 2005 to 111,320 metric tons in
2018, a reduction of 40 percent. This
far exceeds the 15 percent target
reduction outlined in the 2013 plan.
These reductions can be attributed to
the actions taken by the City such as
supporting energy efficiency and the
adoption of electricvehicles, as well
as the City becoming a member of
Silicon Valley Clean Energy in 2017.
ATTACHMENT 1
289
Agenda Item # 9.
Our Impacts CONTINUED
Table 4 provides an overview of the
most impactful actions from the
2013 CAP, measured in terms of
projected 2020 GHG reductions.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 25 CAP 2013 Action 2020 GHG Reduction
Construct all bikeways and implement all programs identified in the 2012 Bicycle Transportation Plan by 2020 -2580 Develop and fully implement a pedestrian master plan with specific focus on local vehicle trip reduction by 2020 -860
Continue to pursue and implement Safe Routes to School Projects -230 Continue to implement the City's Complete Streets policy and traffic calming plans and projects -860 Work with the Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA) to seek opportunities to expand local service to improve connectivity to regional transit options. -1050 Encourage alternative-fuel vehicle charging stations in existing private development. -1100 Amend the Green Building Ordinance to include EV prewiring requirements and encourage EV charging installations in residential development. -330
Amend the Green Building Ordinance to require EV charging stations in nonresidential projects greater than 10,000 square feet. -140
Provide outreach and educational materials for energy conservation and renewable energy programs targeted at outdoor amenities (e.g., lighting, swimming pools, hot tubs). -530 Ensure city residents are eligible to participate in and actively promote and support energy efficiency financing for residential and commercial properties. -2410 Continue to encourage the installation of energy-efficient indoor and outdoor appliances and equipment (e.g., pool pumps). -750
Maintain and expand food waste diversion programs. -950 Continue to encourage recycling and reuse of building materials. -160 Continue to support implementation of the 2010 UWMP through enforcement of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (LAMC 12.36) and distribution of greywater/rainwater harvesting guides. -180 Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades, including installing energy-efficient lighting, appliances, and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems. -120 Adopt a zero-waste policy for City facilities and City Sponsored events. -160 CAP 2013 ACTION TARGET GHG REDUCTION
Table 4 Most impactful GHG reducing actions from 2013 CAP
GHG REDUCING ACTIONS
ATTACHMENT 1
290
Agenda Item # 9.
Our Impacts CONTINUED
Figures 5-8 below show the breakdown of emission sources in 2005 and 2018 for municipal operations and the community.
Overall, emissions associated with transportation make up a slightly larger share in 2018 as emissions from energy use and other sectors have declined.
Figure 5 2005 Government emissions sources Figure 7 2018 Government emissions sources 2005 GOVERNMENT
WATER & WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES
3 BUILDINGS &
FACILITIES
428
PROCESS &
FUGITIVE
EMISSIONS
20 SOLID WASTE
FACILITIES
197
STREET
LIGHTS &
TRAFFIC
SIGNALS
130
VEHICLE FLEET
420
EMPLOYEE
COMMUTE
697
2018 GOVERNMENT
WATER & WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITIES
5 BUILDINGS &
FACILITIES
134
PROCESS &
FUGITIVE
EMISSIONS
21 SOLID WASTE
FACILITIES
172
VEHICLE FLEET
351 EMPLOYEE
COMMUTE
445
Figure 6 2005 Community emissions sources
2005 COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL
ENERGY
20,070
RESIDENTIAL
ENERGY
59,950
TRANSPORTATION &
MOBILE SOURCES
96,610
WATER &
WASTEWATER
2,250
SOLID WASTE
3,950
Figure 8 2018 Community emissions sources
2018 COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL
ENERGY
7,535
RESIDENTIAL
ENERGY
35,661
TRANSPORTATION &
MOBILE SOURCES
71,531
WATER &
WASTEWATER
1,063 SOLID WASTE
2,653
1,895 MTCO2e
TOTAL
1,128 MTCO2e
TOTAL
182,830 MTCO2e
TOTAL
110,192 MTCO2e
TOTAL
26 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
291
Agenda Item # 9.
Climate
Impacts
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 27 ATTACHMENT 1
292
Agenda Item # 9.
Climate Impacts
Figure 9 Annual average maximum temperatures in Los Altos (image from Cal-Adapt) Figure 10 Changes to the water cycle due to climate change.
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group 1– The Physical Science Basis presentation, slides 35.
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Changes to the Water cycle
With warmer temperature
Atmosphere can hold more water
More and faster evaporation
Heavier precipitation
Atmosphere
Frozen regions
Land Ocean
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Changes to the Water cycle
With warmer temperature
Atmosphere can hold more water
More and faster evaporation
Heavier precipitation
Atmosphere
Frozen regions
Land Ocean
28 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 A climate Vulnerability Assessment
was conducted to determine the
increasing climate threats the City
is likely to face, as well as assess
the City’s preparedness and capacity
to address those threats. Following
International, U.S., and California
Climate Assessments, this report is
the first to consider Los Altos on its
own. The Vulnerability Assessment is
included in this report as Appendix H.
To assess Los Altos’ expected
climate changes, global climate
models developed by the scientific
community and recommended by
the California Governor’s Office of
Emergency Services (OES) were
used. The online Cal-Adapt tool
was used to create local outputs
and predict how the frequency and
intensity of climate hazards are
changing. This was cross-referenced
against California’s Fourth Climate
Assessment Bay Area Report, other
scientific and government papers,
and the local knowledge of the
Environmental Commission CAAP
Subcommittee members and focus
group participants.
Even with the bold emissions
reductions at a local level detailed
in the CAAP, Los Altos is subject to
how significantly or poorly emissions
are reduced globally. The increase
in global emissions will cause Los
Altos to experience increased heat
waves, floods, drought, and poor air
quality from wildfires in the region.
Because Los Altos is not coastal it
will not experience sea level rise,
and because of our proximity to the
Pacific Ocean and San Francisco
Bay, we will continue to benefit from
the climate moderating influences
of those water bodies. As a result,
Los Altos will not suffer some of
the extremes of climate change
as directly as some other areas in
California.
ANNUAL AVERAGE MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE
Average of all the hottest daily temperatures in a year.
CHANGES TO THE WATER CYCLE
ATTACHMENT 1
293
Agenda Item # 9.
Climate Impacts CONTINUED
Figure 11 Changes to the water cycle due to climate change continued.
Source: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report Working Group 1–
The Physical Science Basis presentation, slides 36.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 29 Instead, Los Altos will experience
the reverberations from the impacts
of climate change on the natural
environment, the water supply
system, air quality, and the energy
grid which are beyond the municipal
boundary but on which we depend.
So the availability and affordability
of water and energy within Los
Altos are likely to be jeopardized by
climate change across the Bay Area
and California as a whole. Figure 9
displays the temperature change
projections for Los Altos, and Figure
10 describes expected global changes
to the water cycle.
Within Los Altos itself, by mid-century
particularly under a high emissions
scenario, the number of extreme
heat days are projected to increase
substantially, from an average of 4
days/year from 1961-1990 to as many
as 20 days/year. Heat and poor air
quality from wildfires outside of Los
Altos are likely to impact the quality
of life, particularly for vulnerable
populations, and increase energy
demands for additional building air
cooling and filtering. Extreme heat,
poor air quality, and blackouts or Public
Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) that
occur simultaneously will present novel
emergency situations that have the
potential to strain or overwhelm City
resources.
Similarly but more uncertain will be
the resilience of Los Altos' natural and
maintained landscapes. The annual
precipitation amounts in Los Altos are
not likely to change, but will become
less consistent. As a recent example,
Sacramento recorded 7.87 inches
during the 2020-2021 water year
which ended on October 1, 2021, only
to receive a daily record 5.44 inches
on October 25, 2021. Such seasonal
whiplash shows the limits of reading
only annual averages. In combination
with expected temperature increases,
the amount of water that plants will
need during extended, dry summers
will also increase, possibly changing
the vegetation composition of the
area. Considering pressures on the
shared water supply system which Los
Altos relies on, it is likely that water
customers will face financial incentives
and regulatory pressure to reduce daily
water use.
In the winter and spring, seasonal
storms which Los Altos has
experienced in the past are likely
to continue. Extreme precipitation
events (1-day maximums) that used
to occur once every several years
are projected to occur multiple times
a year by the end of the century,
increasing the need for maintenance
and repair of stormwater
infrastructure on building sites and
across the City, as well as increasing
the risk of flooding requiring more
acute management of potential
flood zones. Figure 5 displays the
projected number of yearly extreme
precipitation events in Los Altos in a
high-emissions scenario.
After living through years of drought
and the COVID pandemic, Los
Altos’ government, residents, and
businesses have unfortunately become
familiar with environmental hazards.
Emergency preparedness and hazards
requiring large-scale adjustment and
intervention in some ways will help
Los Altos adapt to climate change.
The scale of climate change and
the need to reach new vulnerable
populations during heat waves, unsafe
air quality days or power outages
present new challenges, though. These
challenges are addressed through a
suite of adaptation strategies and the
Implementing the CAAP section of this
plan.
SIXTH ASSESSMENT REPORT
Working Group I – The Physical Science Basis
Changes to the Water cycle
Heavier rainfall
Intensifying dry seasons and droughts
Atmosphere
Frozen regions
Land Ocean
More global warming
CHANGES TO THE WATER CYCLE
ATTACHMENT 1
294
Agenda Item # 9.
Looking
to
2050
30 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
295
Agenda Item # 9.
Looking to 2050
Figure 12 Business-as-usual forecast
Figure 13 Adjusted business-as-usual forecast
0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
MTCO2e
Adjusted BAU Forecast (2018 - 2050)
Transportation & Mobile Sources Residential Energy Commercial Energy Solid Waste Water & Wastewater Vehicle Fleet
Employee Commute Solid Waste Facilities Buildings & Facilities Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities Street Lights & Traffic Signals 0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
MTCO2e
BAU Forecast (2018 - 2050)
Transportation & Mobile Sources Residential Energy Commercial Energy Solid Waste Water & Wastewater Employee Commute
Vehicle Fleet Solid Waste Facilities Buildings & Facilities Water & Wastewater Treatment Facilities Street Lights & Traffic Signals LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 31 To determine what the City’s
emissions might look like in 2050,
a series of emissions forecasts were
developed. First a Business-As-Usual
(BAU) forecast was developed to
forecast the City’s emissions without
any additional action from federal,
State, or local governments. A series
of growth factors such as population
and household growth were applied
to the City’s baseline emissions, with
the results shown below.
Without any additional action, the
City’s emissions are expected to
increase from 111,320 metric tons
in 2018 to 116,346 metric tons in
2050.
To project the City’s emissions
in 2050 including the expected
impacts of State and local actions,
an Adjusted Business-As-Usual
(ABAU) forecast was developed. This
forecast, shown in Figure 13, includes
expected increases in fuel economy
and building energy efficiency in
California, increased EV adoption
ADJUSTED BAU FORECAST (2018-2050)
BAU FORECAST (2018-2050)
ATTACHMENT 1
296
Agenda Item # 9.
-
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 MTCO2e
Emission Reductions by Focus Area
Transportation Energy Resource Conservation Municipal Operations Emissions Timeline by Scenario (MTCO2e)
Scenario 20051 20181 20302 20352
BAU 184,725 - 112,670 113,650
ABAU -- 83,025 75,700
ABAU+Existing CAP '13 - 111,320 75,885 67,160
CAAP 2022 -- 25,835 3,144 1
Historic Data (data for 2006-2017 not available; 111,320 MTCO2e used as the baseline for all scenarios) 2 Projected data based on models
Looking to 2050 CONTINUED
Table 5 Emissions by Scenario (2030 & 2035)
32 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 in Los Altos, and the expected increase in air
conditioning use due to increased temperatures
related to climate change.
This figure shows that, with the inclusion of
State and local actions, electric vehicle adoption
increases, and increase in AC use, the City’s
emissions are expected to decline from 111,320
metric tons in 2018 to 70,800 metric tons in 2050.
Including the impacts of 2013 CAP actions,
we will need to reduce our emissions by
approximately 67,000 metric tons by 2035 to
reach our carbon neutrality goal. Table 5 below
shows historic and projected emissions under
different scenarios, and Figure 14 displays the
emissions reductions expected to be achieved in
each Focus Area if the CAAP is fully implemented.
EMISSIONS TIMELINE BY SCENARIO (MTCO2E)
Figure 14 Emissions reductions by Focus Area
EMISSION REDUCTIONS BY FOCUS AREA
ATTACHMENT 1
297
Agenda Item # 9.
Strategic
Roadmap
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 33 ATTACHMENT 1
298
Agenda Item # 9.
Strategic Roadmap
Figure 15 Relationship between mitigation and adaptation actions
MITIGATION
ADDRESS
THE CAUSE
ADAPTATION
ADDRESS
THE IMPACTS
SUSTAINABLE
TRANSPORTATION
CLEAN
ENERGY
BUILDING
ELECTRIFICATION
WASTE
REDUCTION
BUILDING
WEATHERIZATION
SMART
GROWTH
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
DISASTER
PREPAREDNESS
RESTORATION OF
NATURE AREAS
EQUIP
COMMUNITIES FOR
EXTREME WEATHER
SEA LEVEL RISE
PROTECTION
WATER AND ENERGY
CONSERVATION
34 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 To propel the City towards its goals
of becoming more resilient and
carbon neutral, a strategic roadmap
of Strategies, Goals and Actions
was developed. This roadmap is
intended to guide us through the
priorities, action steps, when to take
them, and the level of effort and
benefits that can be achieved by
implementing them.
The roadmap is broken into
three sections:
• Mitigation strategies
• Cross-cutting strategies
(that deliver both mitigation
and adaptation outcomes)
• Adaptation strategies
Mitigation strategies are aimed at
reducing the sources of emission that
arise from within the City’s borders.
This includes emissions from energy
consumed, transportation, waste
created, and resources used. To
achieve global climate goals, richer
countries will need to do more on
average than poorer countries. This
is not only equitable, but richer
countries have the means to do so.
Within richer countries, more affluent
communities are expected to do
even more. Within Los Altos, the lack
of heavy industry and large office
buildings will make reducing GHG
emissions easier to achieve.
By reducing the sources and intensity
of the emissions, we hope to align
with and go beyond global climate
goals in order to reverse the harmful
effects of climate change.
While mitigation aims to lessen GHG
emissions, thereby reducing climate
change, adaptation aims to lessen the
impact of climate change. In other
words, mitigation addresses the cause
of climate change and adaptation
addresses the impacts of climate
change - the effect of heat, drought,
air pollution and extreme storms on
Los Altos. Mitigation and adaptation
are inclusive, as everything interacts
with climate.
Cross-cutting efforts address both
mitigation and adaptation. Many actions
the City can take, like increasing the
urban tree canopy, reducing water use,
and developing community microgrids
reduce the source of emissions and
help prepare the City for climate
change impact or emergencies.
Similarly, the effects of climate change
can have the opposite effect if increases
in heat or drought lead to increased
energy use or resource intensity. Figure
15 describes the relationship between
mitigation, adaptation, and crosscutting strategies.
ATTACHMENT 1
299
Agenda Item # 9.
Strategic Roadmap CONTINUED
Figure 16 CAAP Focus Areas
TRANSPORTATION
ENERGY
CLIMATE
ACTION PLAN
FOCUS AREAS
RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 35 In general, mitigation and adaptation
strategies should be viewed as two
sides of the same coin. Together, they
represent a comprehensive set of
actions to address climate change.
DEVELOPMENT &
METHODOLOGY
Through quantitative and qualitative
analysis, stakeholder engagement,
and a survey of best practices, 68
actions were identified. Some of
the actions build off existing efforts
within Los Altos like the 2013 CAP
and the 2018 Green Infrastructure
Stormwater Management Plan.
Most are new strategies adopted
and altered from other California
CAAPs and programs beyond
California. Others were developed
based on discussions with different
stakeholder groups.
CAAP Strategy
Development Process:
• Preliminary mitigation
and adaptation strategies
identified and agreed upon
• Development of “Long List”
of CAAP actions to implement
each strategy
• Community and stakeholder
feedback
• Development of “Short List”
of CAAP actions
• Quantify emission reductions
from actions
Figure 16 displays the Focus Areas
encompassing mitigation, adaptation,
and cross-cutting strategies. The
mitigation strategies were selected
using a multi-factor scoring system, as
well as through qualitative evaluation.
The strategies were modeled using
ICLEI’s ClearPath tool, which allows
rapid scenario analysis of different
actions and implementation times.
All of the adaptation strategies
respond to the vulnerabilities
determined in the Vulnerability
Assessment - that is the climate
events that Los Altos is expected
to experience and the ability of the
people, businesses, environment, and
government of Los Altos to manage
those events. As an example, it was
determined that some of Los Altos’
population are seniors who are
vulnerable to wildfire-induced Public
Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) because
of a combination of health conditions
and mobility limitations. Actions
to address this population include
developing an early warning system
for air pollution, conducting outreach
specifically to vulnerable populations,
and developing resilience hubs, as
described in the Climate Adaptation
Strategies section.
The adaptation strategies were
catalogued according to the climate
hazard they addressed (drought,
heat, flood, wildfire & air pollution),
as well as their feasibility, their cost
effectiveness, whether they would
promote equity, the potential for
greenhouse gas reductions, their
alignment with City priorities, and
other factors.
ATTACHMENT 1
300
Agenda Item # 9.
Mitigation
Strategies
These greenhouse gas mitigation
strategies are designed to cover all
sources of emissions from within
the City, including transportation,
energy, resource conservation,
green community, and municipal
operations. Although the sectors
vary in the amount of emissions
created, a comprehensive,
broad-based set of strategies
addressing all sectors will improve
the effectiveness of the plan and
increase co-benefits.
Important information and details on each action for each goal within each strategy and Focus Area are contained in the Appendices, found under separate cover.
36 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 A series of Prioritization Scores
were developed based on a number
of factors including community
impact, feasibility, GHG reductions,
and projected cost and FTE
requirements.
These scores indicate the relative
importance of the action, 1 being
the highest and 3 being the lowest,
and can be found underneath each
action description.
Appendix A: “What Can I Do Now?” guide
Appendix B: CAAP Fact Sheet
Appendix C: Glossary
Appendix D: Actions List
Appendix E: Technical Appendix
Appendix F: Implementation Leads, Partners, Costs, and Funding Sources Appendix G: Implementation Timeline and KPIs
Appendix H: Vulnerability Assessment
ATTACHMENT 1
301
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 1 TRANSPORTATION
STRATEGY 1
Reduce SingleOccupancy Vehicle Travel
Reduce 2018 fossil fuel VMT
generated by Los Altos by 25%
by 2035
STRATEGY 2
Electrify Transportation
Increase EV component of all light
duty vehicles in Los Altos to 80%
by 2035
STRATEGY 3
Electrify Off-Road
Mobile Sources
Eliminate Off-Road fossil
fuel engines
Transportation is the largest source of
emissions within Los Altos (58% of all
emission), therefore reducing fossil
fuel vehicle travel is imperative. By
increasing active transit and helping
create a walkable and bikeable city,
public health and social connectivity
will be increased. The strategies and
actions in this section are designed to
make alternatives to single-occupant,
fossil fuel trips easy, convenient, and
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 37 attractive to residents and visitors.
The remaining vehicle travel, over
time, will shift to a majority electric.
Figure 17 describes the life cycle
benefits of EVs.
As the City has set an aggressive
VMT reduction target, participation
by all community members will be
required to achieve it.
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
Figure 17 Life-cycle GHG emissions of passenger car segment gasoline ICEVs, PHEVs, BEVs, and FCEVs registered in the United States in 2021.
Source: International Council on Clean Transportation,
A Global Comparison of the Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Combustion Engine and Electric Passenger Cars, pg. 33. annual mileage decreases linearly with about 500 km/a each year (U.S. Department of Transportation, 2017). Accordingly, the fuel and electricity mix in the first years has a higher impact on the total GHGs than the mixes close to the vehicles’ end of life.
LCA results and discussion
Figures 4.1 and 4.2 present the life-cycle GHG emissions in g CO2 eq./km of new gasoline ICEVs, PHEVs, BEVs, and FCEVs in the passenger car and SUV segment. They mostly correspond to the production of the fuel or electricity (WTT) and the emissions of fuel consumption directly in the vehicle (TTW) during the vehicle use phase. For the methane emissions, mostly of natural gas production, also the near-term, 20-year GWP is indicated. The figures further include the GHG emissions of the production of the battery, the hydrogen system, and the rest of the vehicles and of maintenance. 0 50
100
150
200
250
300
Life-cycle GHG emissions (g CO2 eq./km)
20-year GWP for methane
Fuel/electricity production
Fuel consumption
Maintenance
Hydrogen tank manufacture
Battery manufacture
Vehicle manufacture
Gasoline +
biofuels
Plug-in
hybrid EV
Battery EV,
2021-2038
grid mix
Battery EV,
renewable
electricity
Fuel cell EV,
natural gas
hydrogen
Fuel cell EV,
renewable
hydrogen
Current policies vs Paris
Agreement-compatible
electricity mix
Figure 4.1. Life-cycle GHG emissions of passenger car segment gasoline ICEVs, PHEVs, BEVs, and FCEVs registered in the United States in 2021.
150
200
250
300
350
GHG emissions (g CO2 eq./km)
20-year GWP for methane
Fuel/electricity production
Fuel consumption
Maintenance
Hydrogen tank manufacture
Battery manufacture
Vehicle manufacture
Current policies vs Paris
Agreement-compatible
electricity mix
LIFE-CYCLE GHG EMISSIONS
ATTACHMENT 1
302
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035 GOAL 1.1 CREATE A
WALKABLE AND
BIKEABLE CITY
ACTION
Work closely with Complete Streets commission to fully
implement the 2022 Complete Streets Master Plan by
2035, with a focus on specific measures to reduce VMT.
Reassess the development of specific citywide protected bike corridors. Maintain and expand access to businesses while promoting slow streets with biking and walking
access. Improve the safety and attractiveness of walking downtown through traffic calming, dedicated pedestrian
trails and streets, accelerating the development of green downtown plazas, and other strategies. Fully implement
all Safe Routes to School programs in the CSMP. Consider an ordinance to reduce speed limits.
1.1 A
Fully implement
the 2022 Complete
Streets Master Plan
by 2035 and make
adjustments as
needed to comply
with VMT reduction
objectives
Create safe, sheltered, outdoor areas for pedestrians and increase the number of bicycle racks for cyclists. 1.1 B Create a pedestrianfriendly Downtown
and other community
and commercial
spaces throughout
the city
Develop and implement a community-wide Parking
Management Plan that reduces minimum requirements
and sets upper limits on parking spaces for new
development. Ensure the strategy is based on three
principles: increasing dedicated EV and handicapped
parking spaces in key commercial areas, reducing the
parking footprint (turn into green space), and add specific drop-off and pick up zones at strategic locations. Plan for street and parking lot changes to accommodate
conversion to passenger pick-up and drop-off stops at
commercial and other public land use locations.
1.1 C
Develop and
implement a
new Parking
Management Plan
that supports
strategic VMT
reduction
Develop pilot bike, ebike and escooter sharing programs by 2025. Expand programs by 2030 based on lessons
learned. Explore regulations to promote the safe and
responsible operation of ebikes and escooters including issuing permits to private companies and designating
dedicated parking spaces at key locations. Partner with adjacent cities to enable first/last mile travel shuttles to train stations/commuter hubs, including regional
networks of ebike, scooter, shuttle, and Transit Network Company routes.
1.1 D
Pilot shared
bike, ebike, and
escooter programs,
and partner with
adjacent cities to
improve first/last
mile options
TRANSPORTATION
38 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
303
Agenda Item # 9.
GOAL 1.2 PROMOTE
SMART GROWTH
STRATEGIES
ACTION
Require increased residential and commercial density
and diversity along main corridors and commercial areas, including affordable multi-family housing and mixed-use developments. Encourage Transit-Oriented Development
along major bus routes within and outside of the City to attract new employers and better serve the daily needs
of residents and employees. Set a target of at least a
20% increase in the percent of the city’s population
living in high-density Transit-Oriented Development by
2035. Integrate with the City’s Housing Element (ensure meeting RHNA commitments encourages high-density &
affordable housing in transit-accessible/walkable areas).
1.2 A
Support TransitOriented
Development
Work with Los Altos employers and schools to develop a
plan to provide affordable housing or rent assistance for employees to live close to work. Ensure new low-income
and multi-use development is high density housing
located no more than a 10-minute walk or bike ride from transit stops.
1.2 B
Encourage Live Near
Work incentives
Require new multifamily residential developments with
10 or more units to provide Work From Home spaces.
Support future conversion of commercial developments
to residential uses as appropriate. Work with local Wi-Fi providers to expand coverage and speed.
1.2 C
Promote Work
From Home
policies and
infrastructure
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 39 STRATEGY 1 Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035
TRANSPORTATION
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
304
Agenda Item # 9.
GOAL 1.3 SUPPORT
SHARED
MOBILITY
ACTION
Work with local public and private organizations to
develop an electric shuttle program for cross-town
traffic, including "short hops" along main streets and key commercial areas. Explore autonomous options when the
program is mature and expand as needed.
1.3 A
Develop an electric
shuttle program as
an alternative to
SOV travel
Engage with transportation partners like VTA to expand
zero emission transit service in City limits. Explore the creation of shaded and green commuter amenities and
increased bicycle parking in order to help promote a public transit culture. Develop a green mobility app that allows users to check on EV shuttle routes and arrival times, see where available bikes and scooters are and potentially
reserve directly on the app. Include VTA transit routes and schedule, location of EV chargers and whether they’re free. Provide City funding or seek other funding sources to support these efforts.
1.3 B
Expand transit
service, connectivity,
and transit stop
amenities
Implement, mandate, enforce, actively promote, and
use Transportation Demand Management strategies
(TDM is defined as a set of strategies aimed at
maximizing traveler choices). Require new nonresidential developments greater than 10,000 square feet or
anticipated to include businesses with more than 50
employees to reduce VMT through TDM programs.
1.3 C
Require commercial
Transportation Demand
Management programs
Support a rotating car-free day program at local schools and as part of other local events to raise awareness about school commute alternatives. Encourage partnerships
with private schools to develop and implement school
bus programs that reduce school-related SOV commutes.
Work with School Districts in Los Altos and surrounding cities (Mountain View, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Los Altos
Hills) to encourage EV shuttle service for students living >1mile from their neighborhood schools.
1.3 D
Work with Los Altos
School Districts to
reduce VMT
Explore opportunities with carsharing companies to add
or expand service in Los Altos. Develop a target number of shared cars available to individuals. Mandate that
all shared vehicles be EV. Follow progress of shared
autonomous vehicle testing regionally and consider
developing ordinances and policies to guide shared AV
use in City limits.
1.3 E
Develop and
promote community
carshare and carpool
programs
40 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 STRATEGY 1 Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035
TRANSPORTATION
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 3 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
305
Agenda Item # 9.
GOAL 1.4 REACH 80%
COMMUNITY-WIDE
ELECTRIC VEHICLE
ADOPTION
BY 2035
ACTION
Develop a yearly EV fair with participation from local
dealerships and owners. Develop a map of the city
charging network and available dedicated parking spaces.
Create a webinar series on EV ownership. Promote all
available incentive programs and encourage their use.
1.4 A
Increase education
and awareness
of available EV
resources and
incentive programs
Negotiate a discount program with local car dealerships to offer rebates or other incentives to car buyers
purchasing new or used EVs. Require businesses to set
aside a percentage of parking spaces for EVs.
1.4 B
Actively promote EV
adoption and require
EV-only parking
GOAL 1.5 ACCELERATE
COMMUNITY-WIDE
ELECTRIC VEHICLE
SUPPLY EQUIPMENT
SUFFICIENT TO
SUPPORT 80% EVs
ACTION
Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging
stations at businesses with >50 employees, multifamily
homes of >10 units, and in commercial areas. Adopt an
Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Master Plan to identify number and location of EVSE.
1.5 A
Increase the number
of available Level 2 EV
charging stations in
workplace, commercial
and multifamily areas
Create a network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations
Downtown and in other commercial areas, as well as
along major vehicle corridors. Set a 1-mile target for
DCFC stations. Engage local gas stations to explore
conversion to DCFC centers.
1.5 B
Create a citywide
network of DC Fast
Charging (DCFC)
stations
Continue the current requirements for EV pre-wiring and Level 2 charging in new single-family development and
extend to include large remodels and additions, and double the requirements for new multi-family and commercial
development as part of future Reach Code updates.
1.5 C
Double the current
Electric Vehicle
charging and pre-wiring
requirements in future
Reach Code updates
Identify grants and incentives available through State, federal, or local agencies that may be used to support
DCFC, solar EV charging and battery storage. Work with
SVCE to expand existing EV resources and programs.
1.5 D
Identify grants and
incentives to install
residential EV charging
including DCFC, solar
EV charging, and paired
EV charging + battery
storage systems
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 41 PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
STRATEGY 2 Electrify Transportation
TRANSPORTATION
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
306
Agenda Item # 9.
GOAL 1.6 ELIMINATE
OFF-ROAD FOSSIL
FUEL ENGINES
ACTION
Accelerate phase-out of small off-road fossil fuel engines such as landscaping equipment through bans, replacement ordinances, and/or incentives for electric alternatives.
Work to reduce construction-related emissions. Form an
Environmental Commission subcommittee to develop rules
and/or ordinances.
1.6 A
Phase out off-road
fossil fuel engines
such as landscaping
equipment
42 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
STRATEGY 3 Electrify Off-Road Mobile Sources
TRANSPORTATION
ATTACHMENT 1
307
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 1 TRANSPORTATION TIMELINE
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
• Live Near Work/Work
From Home policies
adopted
• Parking Management
Plan adopted
• Transit Oriented
Development
requirements
developed
• Commercial
Transportation
Demand Management
standards passed
• Electric Vehicle Supply
Equipment needs
assessment completed
• Shared bike, ebike
and escooter pilots
launched
• Electric Vehicle
Supply Equipment
to support 80% EV
installed
• City-wide electric
shuttle launched
• DCFC network
completed
• Pedestrian-friendly
downtown created
• 2022 CSMP fully
implemented
• 80% communitywide EV adoption
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 43 ATTACHMENT 1
308
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 2 ENERGY
STRATEGY 1
Reduce Emissions from
Energy Consumption
Reduce the amount of electricity and
methane gas used in homes and
businesses 20% by 2035
STRATEGY 2
Facilitate Building
Decarbonization
Reduce or eliminate methane
gas use in homes and
businesses by 2035
STRATEGY 3
Increase Solar Energy
Production
Facilitate the installation of new
solar capacity and expand battery
storage on new and existing
buildings community-wide
Energy is the second-largest source
of emissions within Los Altos (39%
of all emissions). As the City has
a larger-than-average per-capita
residential energy footprint, this
represents an area of opportunity for
the City. Since most residents and
businesses use low- or zero-carbon
electricity from Silicon Valley Clean
Energy, the majority of emissions in
this category are from methane gas
use. Similar to the transportation
sector, a shift from fossil fuels to
clean electricity or alternative fuels
will be necessary to meet the City’s
climate goals.
The strategies and actions in
this section focus on improving
44 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 community-wide energy efficiency,
increasing community solar and
battery storage capacity, preventing
new methane gas appliance and
equipment installation, discouraging
the use of methane gas in existing
buildings, and ultimately replacing
most or all methane gas appliances
and equipment in existing buildings.
Electrifying transportation and
buildings will increase electrical
energy consumption in the near
term but reduces GHG emissions
as methane gas use is reduced.
Over time, due to the increasing
energy efficiency of electric vehicles
and building equipment, electricity
consumption will also be reduced.
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
ATTACHMENT 1
309
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Reduce Emissions from Energy Consumption
GOAL 2.1 ENCOURAGE
ENERGY
CONSERVATION
MEASURES IN
HOMES AND
BUSINESSES
ACTION
Provide resources to support energy audits including
listing of approved providers, listing of incentive
programs, and other resources. Work with approved
providers to perform energy audits.
2.1 A
Support third party
residential and
commercial energy
audits
Develop a program to increase energy efficiency in
existing residential buildings including wall and ceiling insulation, roof replacements, new ducting and windows, lighting upgrades, and outdoor amenities upgrades.
Identify outside funding to perform upgrades identified in energy audits performed under action 2.1 A, and ensure
eligible residents and businesses take advantage of all available energy efficiency incentive programs.
2.1 B
Increase residential
and commercial
energy efficiency
ENERGY
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 45 PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
310
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 2 Facilitate Building Decarbonization
GOAL 2.2 REQUIRE ALLELECTRIC NEW
BUILDINGS AND
MAJOR RETROFITS
ACTION
Adopt Reach Codes that go beyond Title 24 standards
during every code cycle, including Zero Net Energy
(ZNE) requirements. Expand new building codes to
include large additions and major remodels.
2.2 A
Adopt evolving Reach
Codes and expand to
include large additions
and major remodels
46 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ENERGY
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
311
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 47 STRATEGY 2 Facilitate Building Decarbonization
ENERGY
GOAL 2.3 REDUCE OR
ELIMINATE
METHANE GAS
USE IN EXISTING
BUILDINGS BY
INCREASING FUEL
SWITCHING
ACTION
Develop a program to replace methane gas HVAC
(heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) units in existing residential buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance for HVAC replacements.
Develop a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon
Sale/Remodel" ordinance for HVAC units. Adopt an
ordinance making it mandatory to replace all methane
gas HVAC units with electric alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income residents and Seniors. Provide education and outreach to residents and property owners.
2.3 A
Accelerate residential
HVAC replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas hot water
heaters in existing residential buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance
for water heater replacements. Develop a "Replace upon
Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for
water heaters. Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory
to replace all methane gas water heaters with electric
alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income
residents and Seniors. Provide education and outreach to residents and property owners.
2.3 B
Accelerate
residential water
heater replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas HVAC units in
existing commercial buildings with electric alternatives.
Require permits and enforce compliance for HVAC
replacements. Waive permit fees for electric HVAC
units. Develop a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace
upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for HVAC units. Adopt
an ordinance making it mandatory to replace methane
gas HVAC units with electric alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income residents and Seniors. Provide eduction and outreach to residents and property owners.
2.3 C
Accelerate
commercial HVAC
replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas hot water
heaters in existing commercial buildings with electric
alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance
for water heater replacements. Waive permit fees for
electric water heaters. Develop a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for water
heaters. Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory
to replace methane gas water heaters with electric
alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income
residents and Seniors. Provide eduction and outreach to residents and property owners.
2.3 D
Accelerate
commercial water
heater replacements
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
312
Agenda Item # 9.
GOAL 2.4 DISINCENTIVIZE
METHANE GAS
ACTION
Work with PG&E and community partners to develop
or expand a fee on the use of methane gas within City
limits. Set up a City-led Task Force in 2022 to lead this effort. Funds collected will be used to fund incentives for electric appliance adoption. Potential estimated funds
available each year of at least $500k.
2.4 A
Establish a fee or
penalty on the use of
methane gas
STRATEGY 2 Facilitate Building Decarbonization
ENERGY
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
48 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
313
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 3 Increase Solar Energy Production
GOAL 2.5 EXPAND
COMMUNITY
SOLAR AND
BATTERY
STORAGE
ACTION
Increase solar panel requirements in new construction
from 4kW to 6kW minimum, and add solar panel
requirement for large additions and remodels (>4kW).
Ensure residents and businesses are aware of and take
advantage of incentive programs for solar panels.
2.5 A
Increase community
solar capacity
Adopt Net Zero Building requirements following New
Building Institute guidelines by 2030. Add solar
requirements sufficient to power Net Zero homes to
future Reach Code updates. Encourage battery storage
systems of 10 kWh or more through promotion of
incentive or rebate programs, educational campaigns,
and/or pilot programs. Encourage participation in demand response programs to improve grid resiliency.
2.5 B
Adopt Net
Zero Building
requirements for
new construction
by 2030
ENERGY
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 49 ATTACHMENT 1
314
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
• Residential fuel
switching program
launched
• Solar requirements
updated
• Residential and
commercial energy
efficiency resources
developed
• City-led Task Force on
methane gas fee or
penalty formed and
program implemented
• Ordinances in
place to replace
residential methane
gas appliances
upon burnout with
equivalent electric
ones
• Commercial fuel
switching program
launched
• Net Zero requirements
for new construction
adopted
• Fee or penalty on
methane gas use
passed
• Ordinances in
place to replace
commercial methane
gas appliances upon
sale or remodel with
equivalent electric
ones
• Energy use reduced
community-wide
by 20%
• Methane gas use
eliminated or greatly
reduced
• Ordinances in place
to replace methane
gas appliances upon
sale or remodel with
equivalent electric ones
FOCUS AREA 2 ENERGY TIMELINE
← REACH CODES UPDATED EVERY 3 YEARS →
50 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
315
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 3 RESOURCE CONSERVATION
STRATEGY 1
Reduce Consumption
and Waste
Increase landfill diversion,
reduce water use, and promote
sustainable lifestyles
While waste disposal, water use, and
operation of labor-saving equipment are all
essential activities in the community,
consuming and/or disposing of natural
resources generates community GHG
emissions. The effects of these activities
can be reduced by diverting waste from
the landfill, conserving water, and promoting
sustainable consumption patterns. The
following strategy and actions identify
the City’s goals in reducing the amount of
resources consumed and disposed of.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 51 COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
ATTACHMENT 1
316
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Reduce Consumption and Waste
GOAL 3.1 DECREASE
LANDFILL WASTE
15% AND ELIMINATE
SINGLE-USE
PLASTICS AND
CONSTRUCTION
WASTE BY 2035
ACTION
Increase landfill diversion rate to 90% by 2030 and 95% by 2035, negotiated in the next Franchise Agreement.
Launch an education and awareness campaign for
residents and businesses to help promote best practices.
3.1 A
Increase the landfill
diversion rate
RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GOAL 3.2 REDUCE WATER
USE 15% BY 2030
ACTION
Increase education and awareness of water efficiency
programs through Calwater and other organizations.
Continue to support implementation of the 2015 UWMP
through enforcement of the 2015 Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance. Develop an ordinance requiring
conversion of grass lawns to low-water landscaping. Consider an update to the building code prohibiting new grass lawns.
3.2 A
Increase communitywide water efficiency
Adopt a new ordinance to eliminate non-essential
single-use plastics and prioritize reusable foodware and utensils. Ensure all new single-use foodware and utensils are compostable per guidelines from the Franchise
Waste Hauler.
3.1 B
Eliminate nonessential single-use
plastics
Develop an ordinance requiring the deconstruction of old buildings instead of demolition and the recycling/re-use of materials. Provide incentives to builders for the use of environmentally friendly construction materials.
3.1 C
Reduce waste
from demolition,
construction and
building materials
GOAL 3.3 PROMOTE A
CIRCULAR
ECONOMY
ACTION
Expand consumer education and awareness of
sustainable and plant-based food choices through City
media channels, speaker series, and other methods. Work with the current vendor to expand the farmers market
into a year-round event. Work with local restaurants to increase organic, vegetarian, and farm-to-table menu
options and reduce food waste.
3.3 A
Promote sustainable
food choices
Increase education & awareness of circular economy
concepts, including responsible purchasing habits and the promotion of a Repair, Reuse, Recovery, and Refurbishment economy. Provide support and resources to help local
businesses participate in green business programs.
3.3 B
Encourage
responsible goods and
services consumption
52 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
317
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
• Non-essential singleuse plastic ban
adopted
• Deconstruction
ordinance passed for
buildings
• Sustainability
Speakers series
launched
• Landfill diversion
increased to 90%
• Water use
reduced by 15%
• Landfill diversion
increased to 95%
FOCUS AREA 3 RESOURCE CONSERVATION TIMELINE
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 53 ATTACHMENT 1
318
Agenda Item # 9.
While City activities represent a small part of overall GHG emissions in the community, the Municipal Operations
focus area is the City’s opportunity to lead by example.
Emissions reduction measures may also reduce the cost
of City operations by decreasing energy, fuel, and other material consumption at City facilities.
FOCUS AREA 4 MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
STRATEGY 1
Operate Sustainable
Municipal Buildings
Increase efficiency, resiliency, and
renewable energy at City-owned
buildings and facilities
STRATEGY 2
Reduce
Municipal VMT
Reduce commute fossil fuel VMT
and eliminate City fleet fossil
fuel VMT
STRATEGY 3
Promote Green
Municipal Practices
Create and promote
efficient practices
STRATEGY 4
Integrate Climate
Action and
Adaptation into
City Functions
Incorporate Climate Action
and Adaptation into City
Policy, Budget, Planning, &
Internal Standards
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
54 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
319
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Operate Sustainable Municipal Buildings
GOAL 4.1 REDUCE MUNICIPAL
BUILDING ENERGY
USE BY 30%
BY 2035
ACTION
Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct
comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades focusing on
energy-efficient lighting, motion sensors, appliances, and HVAC systems. Develop a 10-year phase-out program in
which all existing methane gas appliances are replaced
with comparable electric alternatives.
4.1 A
Audit appropriate
City facilities
and conduct
comprehensive
energy efficiency
upgrades
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
GOAL 4.2 INSTALL SOLAR
AND BATTERY
STORAGE AT
CITY FACILITIES
ACTION
Ensure all new buildings are Net Zero and all-electric
with solar panels, battery storage and electric efficient appliances. Align with CA Public Utilities Commission Zero Net Energy goals and definitions.
4.2 A
Build new City
buildings to Net Zero
standards
Install ground- or roof-mounted solar panels at select
City buildings and facilities. Explore options for microgrids capable of going into "island mode" and serving as
resilience hubs during power outages.
4.2 B
Develop battery
storage options and
evaluate microgrids
for cost savings and
resilience
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 55 ATTACHMENT 1
320
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 2 Reduce Municipal VMT
GOAL 4.3 CONVERT 100% OF
THE CITY'S FLEET
TO ELECTRIC
VEHICLES BY 2030
ACTION
Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all City-owned
fleet vehicles with comparable electric versions by 2030.
Conduct a feasibility study to determine the optimal
number and location of municipal and public chargers at City facilities and properties, and install sufficient Level 2 charging to charge EV fleet and staff-owned EVs.
4.3 A
Develop a phase-out
schedule to replace
all City-owned fleet
vehicles with electric
vehicles
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
GOAL 4.4 DEVELOP
GUIDELINES FOR
SUSTAINABLE
EMPLOYEE
COMMUTE AND
BUSINESS TRAVEL
ACTION
Increase options for commute alternatives, including
information and materials that identify available transit and alternative transportation routes. Encourage staff to buy and use EVs through incentives, free charging at City facilities, and other means.
4.4 A
Improve City staff
use of commute
alternatives to
single-occupant
vehicles
Expand the current policy to facilitate alternative work schedule or telecommuting options for City staff to
reduce daily commute trips. Evaluate flexible employee
schedules that allow for at least 50% remote work while maintaining City hours of operation.
4.4 B
Expand Work From
Home and flexible
schedule policies
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
56 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
321
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 3 Promote Green Municipal Practices
GOAL 4.5 PROMOTE GREEN
MUNICIPAL
PRIORITIES
ACTION
Adopt a policy that requires City-owned buildings and
facilities to be zero waste. Develop an action plan to
eliminate waste through diversion and recycling. Work
with event vendors and participants to eliminate waste at City-sponsored events.
4.5 A
Adopt a zero-waste
policy for City
facilities and Citysponsored events
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 57 PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
Decrease community Vehicle Miles Traveled by continuing to allow virtual participation at all public meetings. Allow for public comment by virtual participants. 4.5 B
Continue to allow
virtual participation
in public meetings
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
322
Agenda Item # 9.
These strategies address
both the sources and
impacts of climate change
within Los Altos. These
strategies include the
remaining Municipal
Operations strategies, as
well as Green Community
and Climate Risk strategies.
Cross-Cutting
Strategies
58 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
323
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 4 Integrate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Functions GOAL 4.6 INCORPORATE
CLIMATE ACTION
AND ADAPTATION
INTO CITY
POLICY, BUDGET,
PLANNING,
& INTERNAL
STANDARDS
ACTION
Establish an interdepartmental working group to integrate climate preparedness in planning, maintenance, and
capital improvements though the development of work
plans, screening of capital improvements, and crosssector collaboration. Establish protocols for mitigating public health impacts from heat and air quality with
regional agencies and partners.
4.6 A
Account for climate
change in all new
City projects
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
Ensure that maintenance reflects expected future
climate conditions and variability and not historical
climate data for all City buildings, facilities, structures, and infrastructure.
4.6 B
Incorporate climate
preparedness into City
programs, operations,
and maintenance
protocols
Integrate annual CAAP report goals during the budget
review process at the direction of the City Manager. Plan to inventory City GHG emissions every two years using
ClearPath and track against targets.
4.6 C
Integrate CAAP
goals into City
projects as an
order of business
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 59 ATTACHMENT 1
324
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
• Net Zero building
standard for new
buildings adopted
• Energy audits of City
buildings and facilities
conducted
• Sustainable employee
commute guidelines
developed/updated
• Virtual City meeting
program developed
• 100% of City
fleet converted
to EV
• CAAP goals
integrated into
City budget
processes
• Building energy use
reduced by 30%
• Microgrid pilot at
City facility launched
FOCUS AREA 4 MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS TIMELINE
60 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
325
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 5 GREEN COMMUNITY
STRATEGY 1
Develop Nature-Based
Solutions
Favor and implement nature-based
solutions in the community
Many projects in Los Altos contribute
to an improved quality of life by
providing economic, social, and
environmental benefits for the
community. These projects also
indirectly reduce GHG emissions.
While the measures and actions in
this focus area identify only minor
direct emissions reductions, they
support the reduced energy or
fuel consumption goals underlying
numerous other CAAP strategies.
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 61 ATTACHMENT 1
326
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Develop Nature-Based Solutions
GOAL 5.1 EXPAND GREEN
INFRASTRUCTURE
AND IMPROVE
WATER RESILIENCE
ACTION
Update building code to incentivize rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling. Install systems at municipal
facilities. Develop resources to help residents purchase water-saving equipment, and encourage rainwater
harvesting strategies. Adopt mandatory guidelines
requiring a set of stormwater and greywater management
features in new construction. Utilize reissuance of City’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit starting July 2022 to lower threshold for regulation.
Partner with local and global organizations to identify space and resources to enhance the natural environment
and rural feel of the city.
5.1 A
Create waterefficient buildings
and landscapes
GREEN
COMMUNITY
GOAL 5.2 SEQUESTER
ALL REMAINING
CARBON BY 2035
ACTION
Set a goal of at least 10,000 new City trees by 2035.
Develop a city-wide Urban Tree Master Plan. 5.2 A
Increase urban
tree canopy
Work with community partners to expand the number
and size of parks and wooded spaces within City limits. 5.2 B Expand parks and
natural wooded spaces
Work with the Wastewater Treatment Plant to implement
upgrades to increase the amount of recycled water
production, add desalination and treatment to provide
a drought resilient, potable water supply. Work with the RWQCP to reduce process-related emissions.
5.1 B
Develop a partnership with
the Regional Water Quality
Control Plant to use recycled
water from the plant
Identify land to plant intensive urban forests following the Miyawaki Method. Explore opportunities to develop
carbon farming pilots for carbon sequestration. Partner with local organizations with available greenspace.
5.2 C
Pilot carbon farming
opportunities
Ban the use of non-organic pesticides and herbicides
throughout City green spaces. Develop education and
incentivization programs for residents about use of
alternatives to synthetic pesticides and herbicides.
Develop organic community gardens, pollinator friendly
planting programs and encourage bee farms in residents' gardens through partnerships with local organizations.
5.2 D
Eliminate the use of
non-organic pesticides
and herbicides
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
62 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 3 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
327
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
• Building code
updated to incentivize
rainwater and
greywater harvesting
• City-wide Urban Forest
Master Plan developed
• Partnership with
the RWQCP to use
recycled wastewater
formed
• Carbon farming
pilots launched
• Non-organic
pesticides and
herbicides
eliminated
• Park and natural
wooded space
expansion plan in
place and funded
• At least 10,000 new
city trees planted
FOCUS AREA 5 GREEN COMMUNITY TIMELINE
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 63 ATTACHMENT 1
328
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 6 CLIMATE RISK
STRATEGY 1
Understand and Reduce
Physical Risk
Reduce flood and heat risk
The risk of flooding and extreme heat
can be reduced by first understanding
which areas of Los Altos are most
likely to experience flooding and/
or heat. Vegetation, pavements and
other conditions at ground level
influence both flood and heat risk.
The city can’t stop the rain or the
heat, but it can magnify - or damper
- their impacts.
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
64 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
329
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
GOAL 6.1 REDUCE FLOOD RISK ACTION
The hydraulic analyses that form FEMA's FIRM (Flood
Insurance Rate Map) are decades old. Hire a company
to perform hydraulic analyses of existing creek crossings and culverts to determine how many, if any, are
undersized based on changing precipitation patterns
(climate is typically based on 30-year data cycles).
Replace/rebuild undersized culverts and creek crossings as needed. Work with FEMA to update the FIRMs.
6.1 A
Update city-wide
flood risk assessment
and capital and policy
recommendations
CLIMATE
RISK
Work with Valley Water to revitalize and restore creeks, learning from case studies like Adobe Creek Reach 5
Restoration. Restore the riparian ecosystem of creeks
flowing through Los Altos, add managed ponds and dams
to slow the flow of water, and increase percolation to the ground. Increase natural floodplain management through
policies and education to establish "Buffer Zones" and
limit new construction.
6.1 B
Develop and
implement
comprehensive
riparian ecosystem
restoration plan and
relevant floodplain
management policies
Implement porous paving in sidewalks, parking lots and
driveways, and other water percolation methods like
bioswales to reduce stormwater runoff to streets. 6.1 C Expand green
infrastructure program
to reduce impermeable
surface areas and capture
runoff from paved areas
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 65 PRIORITY: 3 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 3 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
330
Agenda Item # 9.
66 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 STRATEGY 1 Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
CLIMATE
RISK
GOAL 6.2 REDUCE HEAT RISK ACTION
Conduct heat study/mapping to identify areas of
Urban Heat Island and address with capital and policy
recommendations. 6.2 A
Conduct heat study/
mapping to identify
areas of Urban Heat
Island
Require light-colored roofs and/or a minimum specified
reflectance for commercial roofs when new or at
replacement. Explore and implement guidelines to resurface streets and sidewalks with heat reflective surfaces.
6.2 B
Enact reflectivity
standards for asphalt
and ground level
surfaces; enact
reflectivity/green roof
standards for roofs
Promote alternative cooling strategies like shade trees, green roofs, and building awnings. Determine and enact
standards for new buildings 6.2 C
Promote alternative
building cooling
strategies; enact
standards
PRIORITY: 3 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
331
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
FOCUS AREA 6 CLIMATE RISK TIMELINE
• Heat Risk mapped
& studied, solutions
identified
• City-wide flood risk
re-assessed, capital
investments identified
• Flood Insurance Rate
Maps (FIRMs) updated
• All Heat-Reduction
strategies & investments
implemented
• Riparian Ecosystem
Restoration Plan
developed
• Twenty-five acres
of impervious
area managed by
Green Stormwater
Infrastructure
• All City-related flood
reduction strategies
& investments
implemented
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 67 ATTACHMENT 1
332
Agenda Item # 9.
Adaptation
Strategies
The adaptation strategies presented below
are a range of programs, investments,
studies, and policies to help Los Altos
prepare for and adapt to changes in climate.
Since the impacts of climate change are
a combination of climate events (like heat
and extreme storms) and their effect on the
environment and people, some of
the strategies reduce how climate events
cause damaging impacts. For instance,
strategies that provide more shade and
means of cooling can help Los Altos adapt
to increasing temperatures. Other strategies
are meant to prepare Los Altos and its
residents and businesses for a less certain
future with climate emergencies and
discomforts by creating safe resilience hubs
that are protected when other pieces of
infrastructure are rendered unusable.
68 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
333
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 7 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY 1
Integrate Adaptation Into
Emergency Preparedness
and Response
Ensure public safety during extreme
heat, wildfire, and unhealthy
air events
Los Altos already prepares for earthquakes
and other emergency situations. By integrating
growing climate hazards into its planning, the
City can be prepared for these new emergencies.
COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 69 ATTACHMENT 1
334
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Integrate Adaptation into Emergency Preparedness, Response GOAL 7.1 ENSURE SAFETY
DURING EXTREME
HEAT
ACTION
Adjust construction policies to allow extended work hours (earlier or later than usual) to avoid peak daytime heat.
Adjust/extend construction hours in Ordinance 6.16 Noise Control, Section 70 Prohibited Acts during heat waves to avoid peak daytime heat. Work with community groups
and residents to determine best methods of outreach and communication with outdoor workers. Educate employers
and workers about existing worker rights and protections and ways to protect outdoor workers from the effects of extreme heat.
7.1 A
Develop
temperature/heat
safety protocols
for outdoor work;
determine education
and enforcement
mechanisms
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
Adjust park and facility hours to discourage active
recreation during peak periods and extend open hours to early morning/late evening. Develop community cooling
centers at City and non-City sites. Ensure temporary
shade structures are provided for community events.
7.1 B
Adjust/extend park
and public facility
hours during
heat waves
Locate at bus stops, Downtown shopping areas,
trailheads, community centers, and sport courts/fields. 7.1 C Expand public
drinking fountains/
refillable water
stations
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
70 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
335
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Integrate Adaptation into Emergency Preparedness, Response
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
GOAL 7.2 ENSURE
SAFETY DURING
WILDFIRES AND
UNHEALTHY AIR
EVENTS
ACTION
Ensure existing alert systems and safety measures
are updated to address increasing climate risk and
vulnerable, not easily mobile populations.
7.2 A
Update wildfire
warning and
evacuation protocols
Partner with regional agencies to make wildfire and air quality prediction data widely used and accessible to
all, including through an early warning system. If not
feasible, develop Los Altos-specific warning system based on available and accessible data.
7.2B
Develop an early
warning system for
air quality alerts
Two-pronged strategy to retrofit and/or install air filtration systems on resilience hubs, schools, and other facilities.
Separately, provide face masks to filter air for outdoor workers and other vulnerable populations who need to be outdoors before and during bad-air-quality days.
7.2C
Ensure high-air-quality
indoor spaces and
purchase and distribute
N-95 masks to
vulnerable outdoor
populations
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 71 ATTACHMENT 1
336
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
FOCUS AREA 7 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TIMELINE
• Heat Safety & Air
Quality Protocols
developed,
implemented
• Wildfire warning and
evacuation protocols
updated
• 25% of new public
drinking fountains/
refillable water
stations installed
• All Planned Public
Drinking fountains/
refillable water
stations installed
• Climate-hazard
safety protocols
re-evaluated and
updated
• 50% of new public
drinking fountains/
refillable water
stations installed
• Climate-hazard
safety protocols
re-evaluated and
updated
• 100% of new public
drinking fountains/
refillable water
stations installed
72 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
337
Agenda Item # 9.
FOCUS AREA 8 RESILIENT COMMUNITY
STRATEGY 1
Educate and Protect
Residents
Increase public health
and resilience
Like changes with emergency
preparedness, Los Altos needs to
find new ways to communicate with
and ensure the comfort and safety of
its residents. Since not every home,
business, and government building
can be made completely safe and
operational during extreme weather,
Los Altos needs to create or enhance
the capacity of existing buildings to
shelter groups of residents.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 73 COST
EFFECTIVENESS
ECONOMIC
BENEFITS
ALIGNS WITH
STATE AND LOCAL POLICIES
PROMOTES
EQUITY &
CLIMATE
JUSTICE
COMMUNITY
BENEFITS
CO-BENEFITS
KEY
ATTACHMENT 1
338
Agenda Item # 9.
STRATEGY 1 Educate and Protect Residents
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
GOAL 8.1 ESTABLISH
RESILIENCE HUBS
ACTION
Conduct interviews with facility staff to determine their resilience to extreme heat, power outages, floods, and
poor air quality. Compile and analyze to help prioritize investments and coordination. Identify suitable locations for/upgrade evacuation centers to serve as resilience
hubs, safe zones, cooling centers, etc., depending on the event, with the capabilities to provide disaster assistance.
8.1 A
Identify, fund, and
prepare existing
and new public
facilities to serve as
resilience hubs
GOAL 8.2 IDENTIFY AND
PROTECT
VULNERABLE
COMMUNITY
MEMBERS
ACTION
Conduct survey of and outreach to vulnerable populations (e.g. isolated seniors, outdoor workers, long-term care residents) and the people and institutions that care for them. Collaborate with community-based organizations
to develop an inventory of locations with isolated seniors and develop a plan for a social support network during
heat waves, bad air quality days, and other emergencies.
Plan should include orders of assistance, including
temporarily moving vulnerable populations to and from
resilience hubs.
8.2 A
Develop outreach to
and comprehensive
care strategy
for vulnerable
populations
GOAL 8.3 IMPROVE CLIMATE
LITERACY
AND RISK
UNDERSTANDING
ACTION
Form partnerships with neighborhood-based
organizations and businesses to develop Neighborhood
Resilience Hub programs and prepare residents and
respond to climate change. Develop community outreach
and engagement materials.
8.3 A
Update Community
Emergency Response
Training (CERT) to
include growing
climate hazards
Establish an annual micro-grant program to support
local citizen-led projects and programs that will reduce emissions, adapt to climate change and enhance equity. 8.3 B Launch a Community
Climate Action Grant
74 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 1 CO-BENEFITS:
PRIORITY: 2 CO-BENEFITS:
ATTACHMENT 1
339
Agenda Item # 9.
2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035
FOCUS AREA 8 RESILIENT COMMUNITY TIMELINE
• Resilience Hubs
identified and funded
• CERT updated to
include response to
climate hazards
• Outreach and care
strategy for vulnerable
populations in place
• Resilience Hubs built
out and operated
• Community Climate
Action Grant
launched
• Resilience Hubs
operated and
evaluated
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 75 ATTACHMENT 1
340
Agenda Item # 9.
Priority Actions by Focus Area
76 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
TRANSPORTATION
• 1.1 B Create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and
other community and commercial spaces
throughout the city
• 1.1 C Develop and implement a new Parking
Management Plan that supports strategic
VMT reduction
• 1.2 A Support Transit-Oriented Development
• 1.2 B Encourage Live Near Work incentives
• 1.2 C Promote Work From Home policies and
infrastructure
• 1.3 A Develop an electric shuttle program as an
alternative to SOV travel
• 1.4 B Actively promote EV adoption and require
EV-only parking
• 1.5 C Expand the current Electric Vehicle charging
and pre-wiring requirements in future Reach
Code updates
• 1.6 A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines such as
landscaping equipment
ENERGY
• 2.1 A Support third party residential and commercial
energy audits
• 2.1 B Increase residential and commercial energy
efficiency
• 2.2 A Adopt evolving Reach Codes and expand to
include large additions and major remodels
• 2.3 A Accelerate residential HVAC replacements
• 2.3 B Accelerate residential water heater replacements • 2.3 C Accelerate commercial HVAC replacements
• 2.3 D Accelerate commercial water heater
replacements
• 2.5 B Adopt Net Zero Building requirements for new
construction by 2030
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
• 3.1 A Increase the landfill diversion rate
• 3.1 B Eliminate non-essential single-use plastics
• 3.1 C Reduce waste from demolition, construction and
building materials
• 3.2 A Increase community-wide water efficiency
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
• 4.2 A Build new City buildings to Net Zero standards
• 4.3 A Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all
City-owned fleet vehicles with electric vehicles
• 4.4 B Develop Work From Home and flexible schedule
policies
• 4.5 A Adopt a zero-waste policy for City facilities and City-sponsored events
• 4.6 A Account for climate change in all new City
projects
• 4.6 B Incorporate climate preparedness into City
programs, operations, and maintenance
protocols
• 4.6 C Integrate CAAP goals into City projects as an
order of business
GREEN COMMUNITY
• 5.1 A Create water-efficient buildings and landscapes • 5.2 A Increase urban tree canopy
• 5.2 D Eliminate the use of non-organic pesticides
and herbicides
CLIMATE RISK
• 6.1 C Expand green infrastructure program to reduce
impermeable surface areas and capture runoff
from paved areas
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
• 7.1 B Adjust/extend park and public facility hours
during heat waves
• 7.2 A Update wildfire warning and
evacuation protocols
• 7.2 C Ensure high-air-quality indoor spaces and
purchase and distribute N-95 masks to
vulnerable outdoor populations
RESILIENT COMMUNITY
• 8.3 A Update Community Emergency Response
Training (CERT) to include growing
climate hazards
ATTACHMENT 1
341
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing
the CAAP
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 77 ATTACHMENT 1
342
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP
Figure 18 Mainstreaming climate investments
OPERATIONS
• Evaluate vulnerabilities to
climate impacts including
disaster events.
• Develop plan to adapt
operations.
Source: Adapted from Jamesine Rogers Gibson, Built to Last Challenges and Opportunities for Climate- Smart Information in California, Union of Concerned Scientists, November 2017.
MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE INVESTMENTS
MAINTENANCE
• Consider climate impacts when restoring
and retrofitting infrastructure assets.
• Assess opportunities for resilience
and risk mitigation.
PROCUREMENT &
CONSTRUCTION
• Select climate-resilient building
methods and materials.
PLANNING & FINANCE
• Integrate climate projections
into needs assessments.
• Use systems thinking to
address multiple needs and
maximize funding options.
• Engage vulnerable
populations.
• Minimize GHG emissions
from operations.
DESIGN
• Ensure design parameters
reflect adaptation to changing
climate impacts.
• Evaluate and maximize
multiple benefits.
IMPLEMENTATION
OVERVIEW
Implementation will be overseen
by the Department of Community
Development, but rely on other
departments as well as NGOs,
businesses, and members of the
public. Implementing the plan’s
strategies and actions will depend
in part on the leadership of City
government and the specifics of
each action. Sustainability and
adaptation are inherently wide
ranging and not every action can be
implemented at once.
Actions geared toward municipal
operations can be started
immediately. Other actions like
policies and regulations involve City
staff time “up front,” but in the long
run instead rely on the activity of
the private sector. Still other actions
including capital investments involve a
common series of steps from project
scoping, fundraising and procurement,
to planning, design, and construction.
Figure 18 displays the steps and
circular nature of the mainstreaming
of climate investments.
Although actions may have different
milestones to completion and
benchmarks for success, they can
all benefit from monitoring and
reporting which allow implementation
to be evaluated and tracked by City
departments, elected officials, and
the public.
78 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
343
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
Actions that are new capital
investments and program updates and
expansions will require new funding,
in some cases to support new staff
or hire private entities. Meanwhile,
integration and interagency
coordination will be needed to address
climate change requiring low-cost
changes to City planning, budgeting,
operations, and programs. At
minimum, the CAAP goals should be
integrated into future iterations of the
following plans:
• Los Altos General Plan,
Natural Environment and
Hazards Element, and
Housing Element
• Capital Improvements Plan
• Emergency Operations Center
Plan/Manual
• Santa Clara County Hazard
Mitigation Plan - Los Altos
Annex
• Downtown Vision Plan
• Complete Streets Master Plan
The CAAP will also need community
support and broad-based partnerships
to be effectively implemented.
Stakeholder groups should be
addressed across the board, from
youth to our Seniors. A non-exhaustive
list of stakeholders that should be
considered for the process include:
• GreenTown Los Altos
• Los Altos Chamber of
Commerce
• Los Altos High School
Green Team
• Los Altos Village Association
• Los Altos Mountain View
Community Foundation
In addition, public-private
partnerships should be evaluated.
Businesses and those who invest
in the City should understand the
benefits that the actions in the CAAP
could bring them. Support in terms
of time and resources will be needed,
and changes in lifestyle and behavior
may be necessary. Not everything will
necessarily be easy or work perfectly
the first time, and sustained energy
and perseverance will be important.
It will also be important to maintain
flexibility in implementing the CAAP.
As technologies, business models,
and political will at various levels of
government evolve, Los Altos will
need to remain flexible in when and
how it implements the actions in this
plan. As costs and feasibility change,
the City will periodically evaluate
and adjust course as necessary.
Similarly, as progress towards key
targets is tracked the City may need to
scale up or down its efforts depending
on the results observed. The City
should update the CAAP in 2025 and
2030, and report every two years
on greenhouse gas emissions and
progress towards goals. For monitoring
and evaluation of adaptation actions,
the City should conduct a debrief
within one year of all hazardous
events such as floods, wildfires, and
air pollution and adjust actions as
necessary based on those findings.
Unlike mitigation, there are no universal
metrics, targets, or measurement
systems for adaptation. This is in part
because climate mitigation has global
benefits, while adaptation actions
produce local benefits. It is also
because there is no system to measure
baseline adaptation.
Instead, Appendix G lays out when
actions can be expected to be
completed and describes metrics for
measuring progress.
BUDGET
Costs or cost ranges were estimated
for the implementation of each action
and can be found in Tables 6-8.
Based on these estimates, a total of
approximately $14,981,000 will be
needed to implement all mitigation
actions, including approximately
$4.1M between 2022-2025, $5.4M
between 2026-2030, and $5.0M
between 2031-2035. As quality
data on adaptation actions was
unavailable, cost ranges were used
for adaptation and some crosscutting actions. In addition, it’s estimated that 2 new FTE will need
to be added between 2022-2025,
2026-2030, and 2031-2035. Some
costs will fall under other plan
implementations budgets, such as
those for the 2022 Complete Streets
Master Plan.
The cost of inaction is much
higher. In addition, investments in
sustainability and clean infrastructure
reduce costs for homeowners and
businesses, promote growth in local
jobs and the economy, and reduce
recovery costs from climate-related
disasters.
A number of tools and resources are
provided in the next sections below
to help the City take advantage
of existing funding streams. By
leveraging existing and future
funding streams, costs to the City,
residents, and businesses can be
substantially reduced.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 79 ATTACHMENT 1
344
Agenda Item # 9.
80 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Table 6 Mitigation Budget
MITIGATION BUDGET
Focus Area Action # Action Estimated cost Funding source(s) Transportation 1.1 A
Fully implement the 2022 Complete Streets Master Plan
by 2035 and make adjustments as needed to comply
with VMT reduction objectives
n/a (costs
included in CSMP
implementation
budget)
Caltrans
U.S. DOT
Calbike
1.1 B
Create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and other
community and commercial spaces throughout the
city
$215,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
1.1 C Develop and implement a new Parking Management
Plan that supports strategic VMT reduction $400,000 BAAQMD
1.1 D
Pilot shared bike, ebike, and escooter programs, and
partner with adjacent cities to improve first/last mile options
$135,000
1.2 A Support Transit-Oriented Development $300,000
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
1.2 B Encourage Live Near Work incentives $380,000
1.2 C Promote Work From Home policies and infrastructure $110,000
1.3 A Develop an electric shuttle program as an alternative to SOV travel $250,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
Caltrans
1.3 B Expand transit service, connectivity, and transit stop amenities $140,000
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
1.3 C Require commercial Transportation Demand
Management programs $650,000
1.3 D Work with Los Altos School Districts to reduce VMT $200,000
1.3 E Develop and promote community carshare and
carpool programs $5,000
1.4 A Increase education & awareness of available EV
resources and incentive programs $15,000
1.4 B Actively promote EV adoption and require EV-only
parking $160,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (technical
assistance)
CARB
U.S. DOT
1.5 A
Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging
stations in workplace, commercial and multifamily
areas
$140,000
CA Energy
Commission
U.S. DOE
1.5 B Create a citywide network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations $1,350,000
CA Energy
Commission
U.S. DOE
1.5 C Double the current Electric Vehicle charging and prewiring requirements in future Reach Code updates $10,000
1.5 D
Identify grants and incentives to install residential EV charging including DCFC, solar EV charging, and
paired EV charging + battery storage systems
$50,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (informational
resource)
1.6 A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines such as
landscaping and construction equipment $150,000
Energy 2.1 A Support 3rd party residential and commercial energy audits $900,000
Caltrans
ATTACHMENT 1
345
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 81
1.5 C Double the current Electric Vehicle charging and prewiring requirements in future Reach Code updates $10,000
1.5 D
Identify grants and incentives to install residential EV charging including DCFC, solar EV charging, and
paired EV charging + battery storage systems
$50,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (informational
resource)
1.6 A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines such as
landscaping and construction equipment $150,000
Energy 2.1 A Support 3rd party residential and commercial energy audits
Table 6 Mitigation Budget (continued from page 80)
2.1 B Increase residential and commercial energy efficiency $63,000 PG&E
PG&E
BayREN
Santa Clara County
BRACE Grants
U.S. Dept. of Energy
CA Public Utilities
Commission
2.2 A Adopt evolving Reach Codes and expand to include
large additions and major remodels $10,000
2.3 A Accelerate residential HVAC replacements $305,000 Silicon Valley Clean
Energy
BayREN
EPA
CA Energy
Commission
2.3 B Accelerate residential water heater replacements $305,000 BayREN
2.3 C Accelerate commercial HVAC replacements $305,000 BayREN
2.3 D Accelerate commercial water heater replacements $305,000 BayREN
2.4 A Establish a fee or penalty on the use of methane gas $130,000
2.5 A Increase community solar capacity $65,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy
CA Energy
Commission
2.5 B Adopt Net Zero Building requirements for new
construction by 2030 $65,000
Resource 3.1 A Increase the landfill diversion rate $20,000
3.1 B Eliminate non-essential single-use plastics $10,000
3.1 C Reduce waste from demolition, construction and
building materials $63,000
3.2 A Increase communitywide water efficiency $100,000 CalWater
3.3 A Promote sustainable food choices $130,000
3.3 B Encourage responsible goods & services consumption $130,000 Municipal
Operations 4.1 A Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades $600,000
4.2 A Build new City buildings to Net Zero standards $10,000 California Energy Commission
4.2 B Develop battery storage options and evaluate
microgrids for cost savings and resilience $2,200,000
4.3 A Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all Cityowned fleet vehicles with electric vehicles $700,000 BAAQMD
4.4 A Improve City staff use of commute alternatives to singleoccupant vehicles $75,000
4.4 B Expand Work From Home and flexible schedule policies $5,000
4.5 A Adopt a zero-waste policy for City facilities and Citysponsored events $5,000
4.5 B Continue to allow virtual participation in public meetings <$50k
MITIGATION BUDGET TABLE CONTINUED
Focus Area Action # Action Estimated cost Funding source(s) Transportation 1.1 A
Fully implement the 2022 Complete Streets Master Plan
by 2035 and make adjustments as needed to comply
with VMT reduction objectives
$900,00 included in CSMP
implementation
budget)
U.S. DOT
Calbike
1.1 B
Create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and other
community and commercial spaces throughout the
city
$215,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
1.1 C Develop and implement a new Parking Management
Plan that supports strategic VMT reduction $400,000 BAAQMD
1.1 D
Pilot shared bike, ebike, and escooter programs, and
partner with adjacent cities to improve first/last mile options
$135,000
1.2 A Support Transit-Oriented Development $300,000
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
1.2 B Encourage Live Near Work incentives $380,000
1.2 C Promote Work From Home policies and infrastructure $110,000
1.3 A Develop an electric shuttle program as an alternative to SOV travel $250,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
Caltrans
1.3 B Expand transit service, connectivity, and transit stop amenities $140,000
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
1.3 C Require commercial Transportation Demand
Management programs $650,000
1.3 D Work with Los Altos School Districts to reduce VMT $200,000
1.3 E Develop and promote community carshare and
carpool programs $5,000
1.4 A Increase education & awareness of available EV
resources and incentive programs $15,000
1.4 B Actively promote EV adoption and require EV-only
parking $160,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (technical
assistance)
CARB
U.S. DOT
1.5 A
Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging
stations in workplace, commercial and multifamily
areas
$140,000
CA Energy
Commission
U.S. DOE
1.5 B Create a citywide network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations $1,350,000
CA Energy
Commission
U.S. DOE
1.5 C Double the current Electric Vehicle charging and prewiring requirements in future Reach Code updates $10,000
1.5 D
Identify grants and incentives to install residential EV charging including DCFC, solar EV charging, and
paired EV charging + battery storage systems
$50,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (informational
resource)
1.6 A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines such as
landscaping and construction equipment $150,000
Energy 2.1 A Support 3rd party residential and commercial energy audits $900,000
Conservation
ATTACHMENT 1
346
Agenda Item # 9.
82 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
CROSS-CUTTING BUDGET
Table 7 Cross-Cutting Budget
Focus Area Action # Action Estimated cost Funding source(s) Municipal
Operations 4.6 A Account for climate change in all new City projects <$50k
4.6 B Incorporate climate preparedness into City programs, operations, and maintenance protocols <$50k
4.6 C Integrate CAAP goals into City projects as an order of business <$50k
Green
Community
5.1 A Create water-efficient buildings and landscapes $65,000 Water Resources
Control Board
Valley Water
5.1 B Develop a partnership with the Regional Water Quality Control Plant to use recycled water from the plant $50-$500k Natural Resources Agency
5.2 A Increase urban tree canopy $3,650,000
CA Natural Resources
Agency
CAL FIRE
CA ReLeaf
5.2 B Expand parks and natural wooded spaces >$500k
CA Natural Resources
Agency
CAL FIRE
CA ReLeaf
5.2 C Pilot carbon farming opportunities $100,000
5.2 D Eliminate the use of non-organic pesticides and
herbicides $5,000
Climate Risk
6.1 A Update city wide flood risk assessment and capital and policy recommendations
Cost for analysis likely to
be $50,000 - $500,000.
Design/construction
order of magnitude
more.
FEMA/Cal Offices of
Emergency Services
6.1 B
Develop and implement comprehensive riparian
ecosystem restoration plan and relevant floodplain
management policies
$50-$500k
Department of Water
Resources
Wildlife Conservation
Board
6.1 C
Expand green infrastructure program to reduce
impermeable surface areas and capture runoff from
paved areas
$1.5 M to construct
systems to manage 5
acres of runoff/5 year
period, beyond what is
already funded
Natural Resources
Agency
Wildlife Conservation
Board
Water Resources
Control Board
6.2 A Conduct heat study/mapping to identify areas of
Urban Heat Island <$50k Office of Planning and
Research
6.2 B
Enact reflectivity standards for asphalt and ground
level surfaces; enact reflectivity/green roof standards for roofs
<$50k
California
Transportation
Commission
6.2 C Promote alternative building cooling strategies; enact standards <$50k California Energy Commission
-
ATTACHMENT 1
347
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 83 Focus Area Action # Action Estimated cost Funding source(s) Emergency
Management 7.1 A
Develop temperature/heat safety protocols for outdoor
work. Determine education and enforcement
mechanisms.
$50-$500k Office of Planning and
Research
7.1 B Adjust/extend park and public facility hours during heat waves <$50k
7.1 C Expand public drinking fountains/refillable water stations $50-$500k
7.2 A Update wildfire warning and evacuation protocols $50-$500k Public Information Officer
7.2 B Develop an early warning system for air quality alerts $50-$500k Office of Planning and Research
7.2 C
Ensure high-air-quality indoor spaces and purchase
and distribute N-95 masks to vulnerable outdoor
populations
$50-$500k
Resilient
Community 8.1 A Identify, fund, and prepare existing and new public facilities to serve as resilience hubs $50-$500k Office of Planning and Research
8.2 A Develop outreach to and comprehensive care strategy for vulnerable populations. $50-$500k Office of Planning and Research
8.3 A Update Community Emergency Response Training
(CERT) to include growing climate hazards <$50k Office of Planning and Research
8.3 B Launch a Community Climate Action Grant <$50k
ADAPTATION BUDGET
Table 8 Adaptation Budget
ATTACHMENT 1
348
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS
The City has several tools at its
disposal to help implement the CAAP.
Some are less costly and take longer
to develop, yet provide long-term
benefits in the form of partnerships
and engagement. Others, like
innovative funding or financing
options, are more costly and can
provide immediate impact. The City
will consider the following tools in
CAAP implementation:
Form Relationships, then
Alliances: By developing
relationships with a broad base of
community partners, the City can
reduce its risk and help gain public
support and trust. The relationships
can be built into alliances that can
be used as testing grounds for pilot
projects. The City will consider
developing relationships with
organizations such as:
▶▶▶ The David & Lucile
Packard Foundation
▶▶▶ Stanford Healthcare
▶▶▶ Silicon Valley Clean Energy
▶▶▶ PG&E
▶▶▶ Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority
▶▶▶ Santa Clara County
▶▶▶ Valley Water
▶▶▶ Acterra
▶▶▶ Metropolitan
Transportation Commission
▶▶▶ Association of Bay Area
Governments
▶▶▶ Bay Area Air Quality
Management District
▶▶▶ Caltrans
▶▶▶ Resilient by Design:
Bay Area Challenge
▶▶▶ Silicon Valley Bicycle
Coalition
▶▶▶ Silicon Valley 2.0
▶▶▶ Manzanita Works
▶▶▶ Joint Venture Silicon Valley
▶▶▶ Neighboring Jurisdictions
▶▶▶ Existing relationships
including among
all thestakeholders
whoparticipated in the
plandevelopment
Develop Innovative Pilots: The
City can work independently or with
community partners to launch pilots
for new or unproven technologies
and practices. These opportunities
can be used for trial-and-error and
information-gathering before scaling
up programs, as well as increasing
public awareness and engagement.
A typical pilot schedule includes:
▶▶▶ YEAR 1: Launch pilot
and collect stakeholder
feedback
▶▶▶ YEAR 2: Roll out incentives
that resonated with
stakeholders
▶▶▶ YEAR 3: Report out on
results of pilot (case study)
and identify the 2nd level
of implementation
Increase Public Engagement
and Marketing: Working with City
staff or a consultant, increase public
awareness and participation in CAAP
efforts and pilot programs. The
following steps can be used to report
progress and promote successes:
▶▶▶ Capture data- collect data on
energy savings, water savings,
and other metrics from
pilot projects
▶▶▶ Evaluate data in-housecalculate energy, water, cost savings, etc. and conduct
financial analysis to determine
cost-effectiveness
▶▶▶ Internalize data- understand
data in terms of broader
CAAP goals
▶▶▶ Display data- share data with
the public on City website and
other channels
Explore Gamification
Opportunities: Simple and
inexpensive apps can be used to
create fun and engaging activities that
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The following types of contests can be
used to drive engagement:
▶▶▶ Neighborhood vs
Neighborhood
▶▶▶ City vs City
▶▶▶ Apps to record
commitments and
spark action
City-Funded Incentives: Funding
targeted programs is a good way for
the City to demonstrate commitment
and help spur action. The City
will look for opportunities to fund
programs or supplement funding
available through other sources.
City-Led Innovative Financing: The
City can explore innovative financing
opportunities for the community such
as Green Revolving Funds or Climate
Impact Funds to create a dedicated
funding stream for CAAP actions.
84 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
349
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
MONITORING AND
REPORTING
Monitoring the progress towards
goals and reporting on results is a
critical step in implementing the CAAP.
The approach to monitoring climate
mitigation and adaptation actions are
different but both involve collecting
information and data, analyzing
results, and sharing those results with
internal and public stakeholders.
MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING
There are two approaches to
monitoring and reporting of mitigation
actions that the City will take. The
first is a bottom-up approach, in
which individual actions will be tracked
for performance. This approach can
help answer questions related to
whether an action had its intended
impact, whether it did so in a costeffective manner, and other lessons learned from its implementation. This
view is highly useful to further inform
decision making on where to invest in
future emissions reduction strategies.
However, within the limited view of an
individual action or group of actions,
changes occurring at the citywide
scale or some other higher level may
obscure the impact of those actions
when looking at the aggregate change
in emissions. A top-down approach
tracks the City’s progress towards its
high-level targets like energy use and
vehicle miles traveled reductions. This
is important for understanding if we
are on track to meet our goals, or if
we need to consider adjusting any of
the programs. Regular performance
of emissions re-inventories are
a necessary part of performance
monitoring to provide the top down
perspective.
Taken together these two approaches
will inform the scale of the effort
required to continue upon the
reduction pathways required to meet
our targets, as well as the type of
actions that are proving to be the
most effective.
To support monitoring activities, the
City will utilize the ClearPath platform
developed by ICLIE. Monitoring
records will be created to record
information about the implementation
and impact of actions, and reports
designed to utilize the data contained
in those records will reveal the
individual achievements of actions and
overall progress.
ClearPath, which contains the City’s
2005 and 2018 inventory records
and was used to forecast emissions
and develop the CAAP actions, will be
used to produce a series of reports
for the purposes of implementation
and monitoring. Reports available
in ClearPath include implementation
details, status, progress, and efficacy,
as well as reports on projected-toactual comparisons and indicator monitoring. The City will utilize these
reports to track and communicate
progress, both internally and to the
broader community.
ADAPTATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING
Since there are no overarching
adaptation targets like greenhouse
gas emissions, monitoring adaptation
as a whole requires more qualitative
assessments. The number of actions
taken can be measured and metrics
for each action serve as a useful
baseline, but the degree to which Los
Altos has or has not adapted cannot
be measured quantitatively. As an
example, the city will identify sites for
installation of water fountains/refilling
stations, track progress in installing the
water fountains, and track their use.
To track their use requires purchasing
or upgrading water fountains with, at
minimum, metering that is logged daily.
Such data could be compared against
extreme heat days, at minimum. A
more sophisticated study would require
surveys or interviews to determine how
the water fountains help populations at
risk from heat exhaustion. For instance,
if vulnerable populations do not use
the water fountains ever, and other
populations use the fountains at times,
but never during high heat events, then
water fountains are not a successful
strategy for ensuring safety during
extreme heat.
For this reason, the Environmental
Commission will receive updates
from responsible parties
implementing adaptation strategies
and discuss how progress is made.
If actions have not been taken, the
Commission will discuss the reasons
for shortcomings. Similarly, the
Environmental Commission needs to
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 85 ATTACHMENT 1
350
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
Figure 19 Funding options hierarchy
STAKEHOLDERS TYPES OF REVENUE
* Utilities, Ports,
airports, etc.
** Subventions are
tax revenues
passed through
to lower-level
agencies by
formula rather than
competitive grant
STATE/ FEDERAL
LOCAL LEVERAGE
FUNDING OPTIONS ANALYSIS: BENEFICIARIES AND LEVERAGE
STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES
(GRANTS, SUBVENTIONS**)
REGIONAL AGENCIES
(GRANTS, SUBVENTIONS**)
LOCAL/REGIONAL PUBLIC ENTERPRISES*
(RATE REVENUE)
CITIES/COUNTIES
(TAXES, CHARGES)
LOCAL PROPERTY OWNERS
(FINANCING DISTRICT SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS)
determine whether actions that are
successful by their internal metrics
actually achieve the true goal of
adaptation.
Additionally, annual meetings will
incorporate information about the
occurrence, impacts, and responses
to hazardous climate risks like
droughts, wildfires, and heat
waves. The City and Environmental
Commission should be able to amend
the CAAP during its life cycle.
One of the most difficult aspects of
climate change is that adaptation
will likely not be completed in our
lifetimes, but instead be an ongoing
process. As such, the plan as a
document and a guide for action
needs to be re-evaluated and adjusted
in light of climate events and lessons
learned from implementation.
ALIGNMENT WITH
FUNDING RESOURCES
New costs associated with the
implementation of this plan are
expected to come in the form of
capital investments, equipment,
staff time, and professional services
contracts. The funding sources listed
in this section are intended to act
as starting points to help consider
financing options for actions.
The California legislature has passed
significant new funding for climate
action signed by the Governor. The
requirements for disbursement of
these funds have not yet been created,
however the City will work with State
agencies and local legislators to
prepare for many grant programs. At
the time of this writing, infrastructure
and climate spending at the Federal
level has not been decided. The City
must also consider funding projects
itself if outside funding can’t be
secured. It’s important to note that,
although not quantified in this plan,
the costs of inaction on climate change
can be substantial and often far
outweigh the costs of mitigation and
adaptation. An analysis by the National
Institute of Building Sciences found
that for every $1 spent on mitigating
natural hazards, $6 is saved.
Figure 19 shows the relationship
between different funding sources
and stakeholder groups.
86 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
351
Agenda Item # 9.
Table 9 Local funding mechanisms
Mechanisms
Type Examples Description
Financing District
Special Benefit-Based Assessments
Levied on property owners in a neighborhood,
business area, or defined geographic area in order to
provide a benefit which that area receives.
Community Services/Facilities District
Special Taxes
Property Tax Increment
Tax
Property Tax Existing City tax on real estate, based on value of land and improvements
Utility User Tax
Cities and counties may impose UUTs on users'
consumption of certain utility services such as utility delivered methane gas
Fees
Parking Fee
User fees that can generate ongoing revenue, but
may disincentive activities. For instance, a congestion pricing program set up to reduce driving may have a
different structure than a program meant to raise
funds. Enterprise funds require voter approval.
Enterprise Fund
Development Fee
Carbon Development Impact Fee
Congestion Pricing
Bond Bond measures are exclusively for capital
improvements and require financing.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
LOCAL FUNDING MECHANISMS
FUNDING IMPLEMENTATION
Funding is available and can be obtained from local taxes and fees, utility fees, and regional, State, and federal grants. Table 9 describes several sources of funding that Los Altos has the prerogative to create or adjust.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 87 ATTACHMENT 1
352
Agenda Item # 9.
Table 10 Mitigation funding sources
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
FUNDING SOURCES
Geography/
Agency Entity Program(s) Funding Amount/Description
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy eHub Informational resource for home and
vehicle electrification
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Assist
Technical assistance for EVSE for
commercial and multifamily property
owners
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Lights On Silicon Valley $500 rebates for solar+storage Utility PG&E
Residential Rebates
(thermostats, water heaters,
etc.)
$50-$1,000 rebates for home energy
efficiency and resilience
Utility PG&E
Business Rebates (lighting,
refrigeration, energy
efficiency, etc.)
Rebate programs for various types of
businesses
Utility CalWater
Residential and Commercial
water efficiency rebate
programs
$5-$300 rebates for water efficient
fixtures and appliances
County Santa Clara County BRACE Grants
Funding of up to $1.5 million for
resilience building project activities
from September 2021 through August
2026.
Bay Area BayREN Home Energy Advisor
program
Free energy efficiency resources for
homes, commercial, and multifamily
properties
Bay Area BayREN Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs Funding varies depending on programs Bay Area BayREN Water + Energy Efficiency
program Varies depending on fixture/appliance
Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Landscape Rebate Program $3,000 for residential sites, $5,000 for commercial sites
$1,000-2,000 for heat pump water
heaters Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Program
MITIGATION FUNDING SOURCES
Table 10 lists the primary funding sources for
greenhouse gas mitigation actions. They range from
utilities to regional organizations, to State and national opportunities. Each funding source will have specific
types of actions it can be used for, and consideration
will be given to each when implementing actions. In
addition, the City will continuously monitor these and
new funding streams to assist in CAAP implementation.
88 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Geography/
Agency Entity Program(s) Funding Amount/Description
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy eHub Informational resource for home
and vehicle electrification
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Assist
Technical assistance for EVSE for
commercial and multifamily
property owners
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Lights On Silicon Valley $500 rebates for solar+storage Utility PG&E
Residential Rebates
(thermostats, water heaters,
etc.)
$50-$1,000 rebates for home energy
efficiency and resilience
Utility PG&E
Business Rebates (lighting,
refrigeration, energy
efficiency, etc.)
Rebate programs for various types of
businesses
Utility CalWater
Residential and Commercial
water efficiency rebate
programs
$5-$300 rebates for water efficient
fixtures and appliances
County Santa Clara County BRACE Grants
Funding of up to $1.5 million for
resilience building project activities
from September 2021 through August
2026.
Bay Area BayREN Home Energy Advisor
program
Free energy efficiency resources for
homes, commercial, and multifamily
properties
Bay Area BayREN Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs Funding varies depending on programs Bay Area BayREN Water + Energy Efficiency
program Varies depending on fixture/appliance
Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Landscape Rebate Program $3,000 for residential sites, $5,000 for commercial sites
$1,000-2,000 for heat pump
water heaters Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Program
ATTACHMENT 1
353
Agenda Item # 9.
Table 10 Mitigation funding sources (continued from page 88) FUNDING SOURCES CONTINUED FROM PAGE 88
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 89 Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Greywater Rebate Program $200-$400 for Laundry to landscape program
Bay Area
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation
Authority (VTA)
Transit Oriented
Development Program Partnership program
Bay Area
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
Transportation project grants Multiple programs
Bay Area BAAQMD Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
Program $2M for FYE 2022 cycle
Bay Area BAAQMD Carl Moyer Program
$40 million-plus for on-road fleet
vehicles, school buses, and
off-road vehicles
State of
California
California Climate
Investments
Clean mobility, urban
greening, and community
preparedness grants
Funding varies by program
State of
California
CA Public Utilities
Commission Energy Upgrade California Energy efficiency funding and resources
State of
California
California Energy
Commission
California Electric Vehicle
Infrastructure Project
(CALeVIP)
Funding varies by product
Energy Conservation
Assistance Act
Low Interest Loans
State of
California
California Energy
Commission CEC grants List of current grant funding opportunities State of
California Caltrans Active Transportation
Program
Alternative transportation, bicycle,
and Safe Routes to School grants
State of
California Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants $34M statewide for FY 22/23 State of
Clbik(fit) FdiSlit Vifdi
State of
California
California Energy
Commission
Funding for Energy Efficiency and
Energy Generation projects
properties
Bay Area BayREN Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs Funding varies depending on programs Bay Area BayREN Water + Energy Efficiency
program Varies depending on fixture/appliance
Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Landscape Rebate Program $3,000 for residential sites, $5,000 for commercial sites
Geography/
Agency Entity Program(s) Funding Amount/Description
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy eHub Informational resource for home and
vehicle electrification
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Assist
Technical assistance for EVSE for
commercial and multifamily property
owners
Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Lights On Silicon Valley $500 rebates for solar+storage Utility PG&E
Residential Rebates
(thermostats, water heaters,
etc.)
$50-$1,000 rebates for home energy
efficiency and resilience
Utility PG&E
Business Rebates (lighting,
refrigeration, energy
efficiency, etc.)
Rebate programs for various types of
businesses
Utility CalWater
Residential and Commercial
water efficiency rebate
programs
$5-$300 rebates for water efficient
fixtures and appliances
County Santa Clara County BRACE Grants
Funding of up to $1.5 million for
resilience building project activities
from September 2021 through August
2026.
Bay Area BayREN Home Energy Advisor
program
Free energy efficiency resources for
homes, commercial, and multifamily
properties
Bay Area BayREN Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs Funding varies depending on programs Bay Area BayREN Water + Energy Efficiency
program Varies depending on fixture/appliance
Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Landscape Rebate Program $3,000 for residential sites, $5,000 for commercial sites
$1,000-2,000 for heat pump water
heaters Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Program
ATTACHMENT 1
354
Agenda Item # 9.
Low Interest Loans
State of
California
California Energy
Commission CEC grants List of current grant funding opportunities State of
California Caltrans Active Transportation
Program
Alternative transportation, bicycle,
and Safe Routes to School grants
State of
California Caltrans Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grants $34M statewide for FY 22/23
State of
California Calbike (nonprofit) Funding Sources list Various funding sources FUNDING SOURCES CONTINUED FROM PAGE 89
es
Geography/Agency Entity Program(s) Funding Amount/Description Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy eHub Informational resource for home and vehicle electrification Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Program $1,000-2,000 for heat pump water heaters Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy FutureFit Assist Technical assistance for EVSE for commercial and multifamily property owners Utility Silicon Valley Clean
Energy Lights On Silicon Valley $500 rebates for solar+storage Utility PG&E Residential Rebates (thermostats,
water heaters, etc.)
$50-$1,000 rebates for home energy efficiency
and resilience
Utility PG&E
Business Rebates (lighting,
refrigeration, energy efficiency,
etc.)
Rebate programs for various types of businesses
Utility CalWater Residential and Commercial
water efficiency rebate programs
$5-$300 rebates for water efficient fixtures and
appliances
County Santa Clara County BRACE Grants
Funding of up to $1.5 million for resilience building
project activities from September 2021 through
August 2026.
Bay Area BayREN Home Energy Advisor program Free energy efficiency resources for homes, commercial, and multifamily properties
Bay Area BayREN Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs Funding varies depending on programs Bay Area BayREN Water + Energy Efficiency
program Varies depending on fixture/appliance
Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Landscape Rebate Program $3,000 for residential sites, $5,000 for commercial sites Bay Area Santa Clara Valley
Water District Greywater Rebate Program $200-$400 for Laundry to Landscape program Bay Area
Santa Clara Valley
Transportation
Authority (VTA)
Transit Oriented Development
Program Partnership program
Bay Area
Metropolitan
Transportation
Commission
Transportation project grants Multiple programs
Bay Area BAAQMD Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
Program $2M for FYE 2022 cycle
Table 10 Mitigation funding sources (continued from page 89) Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
90 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 State of
California
CA Air Resources
Board
Clean Vehicle Rebate
Project
Up to $7,000 rebate for purchase
or lease of new EV
State of
California CAL FIRE Urban and Community
Forestry Grant Program Grant opportunities
State of
California California ReLeaf urban forestry grant programs Grant opportunities Federal U.S. DOE Property Assessed Clean
Energy (PACE) Financing Funding varies by program
Federal U.S. DOE
Electric Vehicle Supply
Equipment Loan and Rebate
Program (small businesses)
Rebate of 50% of the loan loss
reserve amount
Federal EPA Solar Energy System tax
credits
Tax credits for solar water heaters
and PV systems
Federal U.S. Dept. of
Transportation
Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
Funding for projects on public road,
pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure, and transit
capital projects
Federal U.S. Dept. of
Transportation RAISE grants Grants for transportation projects ($1BN for FY 21)
ATTACHMENT 1
355
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
Geography/
Agency Entity Program 2021-22 Funding (in millions)
Bay Area San Francisco Bay
Restoration Authority
Competitive Grant Round
and Community Grants
Program
$10-25
State of
California
California Coastal
Conservancy
State Coastal Conservancy
Grant Program 250*
State of
California Cal Fire Urban and Community
Forestry $10
State of
California
California Ocean
Protection Council Rotating Grant Program
State of
California
California
Transportation
Commission
Transportation Improvement
Fees (Highway Users Tax
Account (0062))
$238
State of
California
Department of Parks &
Recreation
Land and Water
Conservation Fund Grants
Habitat Restoration $125*
State of
California
Department of Water
Resources
Table 11 Adaptation funding sources
FUNDING SOURCES
ADAPTATION FUNDING
SOURCES
Table 11 contains sources of grants
from government sources that fund
activities that align with adaptation
programs. Grants have the
advantages of being “free cash,” but
the disadvantages are that they are
typically competitive, have funding
criteria that may not align exactly
with the desired adaptation action,
and reporting requirements. Grants
are typically one-time or multi-year
and not available for long-term
actions. In California, many State
grants are tied to specific ballot
propositions (like Proposition 1,
Proposition 68) and annual Budget
Allocations. In September, 2021,
Governor Newsom signed a budget
for California Comeback Plan’s with
over $15 billion in climate changerelated funding, including $3.69 billion for climate resilience. Much of
the funding will be for grants as part
of programs run by state agencies
and intended for disbursements
to local governments for planning
studies and one-time capital
investments. These sources can be
substantial.
Additional funding resources in the
form of searchable databases are also
available to the City, including the
Cool California (CARB) Funding Wizard
and the California Grants Portal
offered by the State of California.
These databases will be monitored
regularly to take advantage of all
available funding opportunities.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 91 Geography/
Agency Entity Program 2021-22 Funding (in millions)
Bay Area San Francisco Bay
Restoration Authority
Competitive Grant Round
and Community Grants
Program
$10-25
State of
California
California Coastal
Conservancy
State Coastal Conservancy
Grant Program 250*
State of
California Cal Fire Urban and Community
Forestry $10
State of
California
California Ocean
Protection Council Rotating Grant Program
State of
California
California
Transportation
Commission
Transportation Improvement
Fees (Highway Users Tax
Account (0062))
$238
State of
California
Department of Parks &
Recreation
Land and Water
Conservation Fund Grants
Habitat Restoration $125*
State of
California
Department of Water
Resources
ATTACHMENT 1
356
Agenda Item # 9.
State of
California Cal Fire Urban and Community
Forestry $10
State of
California
California Ocean
Protection Council Rotating Grant Program
State of
California
California
Transportation
Commission
Transportation Improvement
Fees (Highway Users Tax
Account (0062))
$238
State of
California
Department of Parks &
Recreation
Land and Water
Conservation Fund Grants
Habitat Restoration $125*
Urban Water Management
Grants $500
Transformative Climate
Communities $115
Regional Climate
Collaboratives $10
Water Resilience Projects $165
Urban Greening Program $50
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants $10
Regional Climate Resilience $25
State of
California
Water Resources
Control Board
Division of Financial
Assistance
Office of Planning and
Research
State of
California
State of
California
Department of Water
Resources
State of
California
Strategic Growth
Council
State of
California
Natural Resources
Agency
Table 11 Adaptation funding sources (continued from page 91) FUNDING SOURCES CONTINUED FROM PAGE 91
Geography/
Agency Entity Program 2021-22 Funding (in millions)
Bay Area San Francisco Bay
Restoration Authority
Competitive Grant Round
and Community Grants
Program
$10-25
State of
California
California Coastal
Conservancy
State Coastal Conservancy
Grant Program 250*
State of
California Cal Fire Urban and Community
Forestry $10
State of
California
California Ocean
Protection Council Rotating Grant Program
State of
California
California
Transportation
Commission
Transportation Improvement
Fees (Highway Users Tax
Account (0062))
$238
State of
California
Department of Parks &
Recreation
Land and Water
Conservation Fund Grants
Habitat Restoration $125*
Urban Water Management
Grants $500
Transformative Climate
Communities $115
Regional Climate
Collaboratives $10
Water Resilience Projects $165
Urban Greening Program $50
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants $10
Regional Climate Resilience $25
State of
California
Water Resources
Control Board
Division of Financial
Assistance
Office of Planning and
Research
State of
California
State of
California
Department of Water
Resources
State of
California
Strategic Growth
Council
State of
California
Natural Resources
Agency
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
92 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
357
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
Figure 20 Consumption-based inventories explained
SECTOR-BASED
GHG EMISSIONS
SECTOR-BASED GHG EMISSIONS CONSUMPTION-BASED GHG EMISSIONS
CONSUMPTION-BASED
GHG EMISSIONS
CONSUMERS
OUTSIDE
THE CITY
GHG EMISSIONS FROM EXPORTED
GOODS AND SERVICES
GHG EMISSIONS FROM HOUSEHOLD
USE OF FUEL AND ELECTRICITY, AND
CONSUMPTION OF GOODS AND
SERVICES PRODUCED IN THE CITY
PRODUCTION
INSIDE THE CITY
CONSUMERS
INSIDE
THE CITY
GHG EMISSIONS
FROM IMPORTED
GOODS AND
SERVICES
PRODUCTION
OUTSIDE THE CITY
A NOTE ON CONSUMPTIONBASED INVENTORIES
A Consumption-Based Inventory is a
method used to calculate emissions
from the goods and services we
consume. These sources can include
land management, the production
of buildings, vehicles, food, and
consumer goods and services.
Figure 20 describes the relationship
between emissions included in
Consumption-Based and SectorBased inventories. According to ICLEI, 45 percent of global emissions
are directly linked to our lifestyles.
As an affluent community, we in
Los Altos have a responsibility to be
aware of the impact our actions have
and consider changing our habits
based on that impact.
Conducting a Consumption-Based
Inventory helps provide a complete
picture of emission caused not only
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 93 ATTACHMENT 1
358
Agenda Item # 9.
Implementing the CAAP CONTINUED
by activities within the City, but also
emissions caused by consumption
habits, and provides useful insights
to inform a holistic sustainability
strategy. Consumption-Based
Inventories are gaining traction
among local, regional and state
governments across the country.
This approach encompasses the
full lifecycle emissions of goods
and services, including those
from production, pre-purchase
transportation, wholesale and retail,
use, and post-consumer disposal.
Estimating consumption-based
emissions helps cities illustrate the
strong link between consumption
and climate change and provides
them with a platform for addressing
consumption in climate action
planning efforts. Specifically, this
type of analysis provides a method
for designing local programs that
reduce emissions through:
• Targeting carbon-intensive
consumption categories
• Targeting lifecycle phases
(e.g. production, use) with
the highest emissions
• Supporting shifts in
consumption to those
activities with lower
emissions
Although a Consumption-Based
Inventory (CBI) was beyond the
scope of this update, Los Altos will
consider conducting a CBI in the
future to capture all emissions, both
direct and caused by consumption
patterns that arise as a result of our
daily activities. Such an inventory
will give a clearer picture of our
impact, and further improve our
community’s sustainability.
CONCLUSION
The goals of this plan are to set
the City on a path towards carbon
neutrality and climate resilience. The
goals are ambitious, but ones that
we believe we can achieve. There
will undoubtedly be twists and turns
on this path, and we will need to
stay flexible and adaptive along the
way. But if we can achieve these
goals - carbon neutrality, equity,
sustainability, resilience - we believe
that we can create a community
that is healthy, connected, and
vibrant. Please fully participate in
implementing this CAAP and see
Appendix A presenting personal
actions, entitled “What Can I Do
Now?" to find suggestions for simple
actions each individual can take to
help, as well as refering to the Fact
Sheet in Appendix B for a summary of
key information.
94 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 1
359
Agenda Item # 9.
Appendices
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 95 Los Altos
Climate Action & Adaptation Plan
ATTACHMENT 2
360
Agenda Item # 9.
"WHAT CAN I DO NOW?"
• Before leaving home in your vehicle
consider walking, biking, taking
public transportation, or if not
possible combine the activity with
another that requires using your
vehicle or complete the errand by
internet or voice contact.
• Encourage your child to walk or
bike to school.
• Arrange a carpool for work, school
and activities.
• When you need to replace a
vehicle, purchase a new or used
electric vehicle.
• Replace your gasoline powered
home landscape and maintenance
equipment with electric powered
equipment.
• Require that your home landscape
and maintenance service providers
use electric powered equipment.
• Have an energy audit prepared for
your residence.
• Complete recommended energy
audit efficiency measures for your
residence.
• Turn off appliances and lights when
not in use. Consider installing
motion sensors for light switches.
• Adjust your residence’s thermostat
a degree or two to reduce energy
used for heating and cooling.
Install a smart thermostat to
reduce energy use when not at
home or sleeping.
• Prepare to convert your home
appliances from methane gas to
electric powered.
• Change your home appliances from
methane gas to electric powered
when planned or upon burnout.
Incentives are available through
BayRen and SVCE for heat pump
water heaters for example.
• Install solar panels + battery
storage in your residence.
• Attend green building seminars
hosted by the City.
• If you’re not already, become
a Silicon Valley Clean Energy
customer and opt up to the
GreenPrime 100% renewable
service option.
• Recycle all plastics, paper/
cardboard, glass, cans and food
waste. Carefully sort your waste into
blue bin recycling (glass, plastic,
cans, paper), green bin (yard and
food waste), and gray bin (landfill
garbage; try to limit to less than
10% of total waste). Rinse plastic
and glass containers and cans
before sending to recycling.
• Do not purchase food and
consumables in single-use plastic
containers and packaging.
• Bring your own shopping and
produce bags when shopping.
• Donate unwanted reusable items.
• Repair and reuse items.
• Convert residential landscaping to
drought tolerant native plants.
• Remove or reduce lawn area if
possible. Do not replace with
artificial turf.
• Convert landscape irrigation to
drip systems.
• Eat more fruits and vegetables and
less meat.
• Reduce your water use: take
shorter showers (avoid baths),
install low flow fixtures (shower
heads, toilets and faucets) and
consider installing a greywater
recycling system.
• When possible, avoid taking planes.
TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
96 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
APPENDIX A
ATTACHMENT 2
361
Agenda Item # 9.
"WHAT CAN I DO NOW?"
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
• Support our City’s conservation and
GHG reduction efforts.
GREEN
COMMUNITY
• Eliminate rain and irrigation water
runoff from your residence.
• Plant one or more new trees on
your property.
• Begin backyard composting and
enrich your soil with compost and
mulch.
• Do not use non-organic pesticides
or herbicides.
CLIMATE RISK
• Evaluate your risk for flooding,
excessive heat and poor air quality.
• Consider installing A/C and air
purifiers in some rooms.
• Talk to your neighborhood CERT
team about local climate risk
emergency measures.
• Talk with your homeowner,
business, or rental insurance
provider about your coverage for
flood and wildfire damage.
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
• Make sure you have a household
emergency plan - know when to
evacuate and when to shelter in
place.
• Stock an emergency response
kit with food, water, flashlights,
batteries, N-95 masks, and
personal needs.
• Know your vulnerabilities and
plan for how to receive necessary
assistance.
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
• Get to know your neighbors if
you don’t already. Talk with them
about their emergency plans.
If you are part of a building,
neighborhood, or homeowner
association, make sure you
understand how you and your
neighbors can communicate before
and during a climate disruption
or disaster. Assist those with
vulnerabilities.
• Participate in Neighborhood Watch
and CERT groups.
• Educate yourself and others on how
to reduce your carbon footprint.
• Speak out in support of City efforts
to implement the CAAP.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 97
APPENDIX A
ATTACHMENT 2
362
Agenda Item # 9.
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
CAAP GOAL
Carbon Neutrality by 2035
FOCUS AREA GOALS
TRANSPORTATION
Strategy 1: Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035
GOALS:
• Creating a Walkable and Bikeable City
• Promoting Smart Growth Strategies
• Supporting Shared Mobility
Strategy 2: Electrify Transportation
GOALS:
• Reach 80% Community-Wide Electric Vehicle Adoption by 2035 • Accelerate Community-Wide Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Suffi cient to Support 80% EVs
Strategy 3: Electrify Off-Road Mobile Sources
GOAL:
• Eliminate Off-Road Fossil Fuel Engines
ENERGY
Strategy 1: Reduce Emissions from Energy Consumption
GOAL:
• Encourage Energy Conservation Measures in Homes and
Businesses
Strategy 2: Facilitate Building Decarbonization
GOALS:
• Require All-Electric New Buildings and Major Retrofi ts • Reduce or Eliminate Methane Gas Use in Existing Buildings by Increasing Fuel Switching
• Disincentivize Methane Gas
Strategy 3: Increase Solar Energy Production
GOAL:
• Expand Community Solar and Battery Storage
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
Strategy 1: Reduce Consumption and Waste
GOALS:
• Decrease Landfi ll Waste by 15% and Eliminate Single-Use Plastics and Construction Waste by 2035
• Reduce Water Use by 15% by 2030
• Promote a Circular Economy
APPENDIX B
98 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
363
Agenda Item # 9.
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
Strategy 1: Operate Sustainable Municipal Buildings
GOALS:
• Reduce Municipal Building Energy Use by 30% by 2035
• Install Solar + Battery Storage at City facilities
Strategy 2: Reduce Municipal VMT
GOALS:
• Convert 100% of the City's Fleet to Electric Vehicles by 2030 • Develop Guidelines for Sustainable Employee Commute and Business Travel
Strategy 3: Promote Green Municipal Practices
GOALS:
• Prioritize Responsible Procurement
• Utilize Digital and Remote Systems to reduce VMT
Strategy 4: Integrate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Functions
GOAL:
• Incorporate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Policy, Budget, Planning, & Internal Standards
GREEN COMMUNITY
Strategy 1: Develop Nature-Based Solutions
Goals:
• Expand Green Infrastructure & Improve Water Resilience • Sequester All Remaining Carbon by 2035
CLIMATE RISK
Strategy 1: Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
Goals:
• Reduce Flood Risk
• Reduce Heat Risk
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Strategy 1: Integrate Adaptation Into Emergency
Preparedness and Response
Goals:
• Ensure Safety During Extreme Heat
• Ensure Safety During Wildfi re and Unhealthy Air Events
RESILIENT COMMUNITY
Strategy 1: Educate and Protect Residents
Goals:
• Establish Resilience Hubs
• Identify and Protect Vulnerable Community Members
• Improve Climate Literacy and Risk Understanding
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
APPENDIX B
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 99 ATTACHMENT 2
364
Agenda Item # 9.
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
KEY ACTIONS
TRANSPORTATION
1. Fully implement the 2021 Complete Streets Master Plan by 2035 and make adjustments as needed to comply with
VMT reduction objectives
2. Create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and other
community and commercial spaces throughout the city
3. Develop and implement a new Parking Management Plan
that supports strategic VMT reduction
4. Pilot shared bike, ebike, and escooter programs, and partner with adjacent cities to improve fi rst/last mile options
5. Support Transit-Oriented Development
6. Encourage Live Near Work incentives
7. Promote Work From Home policies and infrastructure
8. Develop an electric shuttle program as an alternative to SOV travel
9. Expand transit service, connectivity, and transit stop amenities
10. Require commercial Transportation Demand
Management programs
11. Work with Los Altos School Districts to reduce VMT
12. Develop and promote community carshare
and carpool programs
13. Increase education and awareness of available EV
resources and incentive programs
14. Actively promote EV adoption and require EV-only parking
15. Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging stations in workplace, commercial and multifamily areas
16. Create a citywide network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations
17. Expand the current Electric Vehicle charging and prewiring requirements in future Reach Code updates
18. Identify grants and incentives to install residential EV charging including DCFD, solar EV charging, and paired EV charging + battery storage systems
19. Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines
APPENDIX B
100 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
365
Agenda Item # 9.
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
KEY ACTIONS
ENERGY
1. Support third-party residential and commercial energy effi ciency audits
2. Increase residential and commercial energy effi ciency
3. Adopt evolving Reach Codes and expand to include large additions and major remodels
4. Accelerate residential HVAC replacements
5. Accelerate residential water heater replacements
6. Accelerate commercial HVAC replacements
7. Accelerate commercial water heater replacements
8. Establish a fee or penalty on the use of methane gas
9. Increase community solar capacity
10. Adopt Net Zero Building requirements for new construction by 2030
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
1. Increase the landfi ll diversion rate
2. Eliminate non-essential single-use plastics
3. Reduce waste from demolition, construction
and building materials
4. Increase community-wide water effi ciency
5. Promote sustainable food choices
6. Encourage responsible goods & services consumption
MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
1. Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy effi ciency upgrades
2. Build new City buildings to Net Zero standards
3. Develop battery storage options and evaluate microgrids for cost savings and resilience
4. Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all City-owned fl eet vehicles with electric vehicles
5. Improve City staff use of commute alternatives to single-occupant vehicles
6. Expand Work From Home and fl exible schedule policies
7. Develop Work From Home and fl exible schedule policies
8. Adopt a zero-waste policy for City facilities and City-sponsored events
9. Continue to allow virtual participation in public meetings
10. Account for climate change in all new City projects
11. Incorporate climate preparedness into City programs, operations, and maintenance protocols
12. Integrate CAAP goals into the budget process
APPENDIX B
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 101 ATTACHMENT 2
366
Agenda Item # 9.
ENERGY TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE
CONSERVATION
GREEN
COMMUNITY
MUNICIPAL
OPERATIONS
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
CLIMATE
RISK
RESILIENT
COMMUNITY
KEY ACTIONS
GREEN COMMUNITY
1. Create water-effi cient buildings and landscapes
2. Develop a partnership with the Regional Water Quality Control Plant to use recycled water from the plant
3. Increase urban tree canopy
4. Expand parks and natural wooded spaces
5. Pilot carbon farming opportunities
6. Eliminate the use of non-organic pesticides and herbicides
CLIMATE RISK
1. Update city wide fl ood risk assessment and capital and policy recommendations
2. Develop and implement comprehensive riparian ecosystem restoration plan and relevant fl oodplain management policies
3. Expand green infrastructure program to reduce impermeable surface areas and capture runoff from paved areas
4. Conduct heat study/mapping to identify areas of
Urban Heat Island
5. Enact refl ectivity standards for asphalt and ground level surfaces; enact refl ectivity/green roof standards for roofs
6. Promote alternative building cooling strategies;
enact standards
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
1. Develop temperature/heat safety protocols for outdoor work.
Determine education and enforcement mechanisms
2. Adjust/extend park and public facility hours during heat waves
3. Expand public drinking fountains/refi llable water stations
4. Update wildfi re warning and evacuation protocols
5. Develop an early warning system for air quality alerts
6. Ensure high-air-quality indoor spaces and purchase and distribute N-95 masks to vulnerable outdoor populations
RESILIENT COMMUNITY
1. Identify, fund, and prepare existing and new public facilities to serve as resilience hubs
2. Develop outreach to and comprehensive care strategy for vulnerable populations
3. Update Community Emergency Response Training (CERT) to include growing climate hazards
4. Launch a Community Climate Action Grant
APPENDIX B
102 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
367
Agenda Item # 9.
Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2)
emission that would cause the
same integrated radiative forcing or
temperature change, over a given
time horizon, as an emitted amount
of a greenhouse gas (GHG) or a
mixture of GHGs1.
Carbon Neutrality
Reducing as many emissions as
possible, sequestering the remaining
emissions through nature-based
solutions, and utilizing innovative
carbon sequestration solutions,
community-based sequestration
projects, and local carbon offsets to
reach zero net emissions.
Carbon Sequestration
The process of storing carbon in a
carbon pool1.
Climate Change
Climate change refers to a change in
the state of the climate that can be
identified (e.g., by using statistical
tests) by changes in the mean and/
or the variability of its properties and
that persists for an extended period,
typically decades or longer1.
Climate Mitigation
A human intervention to reduce
emissions or enhance the sinks of
greenhouse gases2.
Climate Resilience
The capacity of social, economic
and environmental systems to
cope with a hazardous event or
trend or disturbance, responding or
reorganizing in ways that maintain
their essential function, identity and
structure while also maintaining the
capacity for adaptation, learning and
transformation2.
Glossary
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 103
APPENDIX C
Climate Risk
The potential for adverse
consequences where something
of value is at stake and where the
occurrence and degree of an outcome
is uncertain. In the context of the
assessment of climate impacts,
the term risk is often used to
refer to the potential for adverse
consequences of a climate-related
hazard, or of adaptation or mitigation
responses to such a hazard, on lives,
livelihoods, health and well-being,
ecosystems and species, economic,
social and cultural assets, services
(including ecosystem services), and
infrastructure2.
Climate Vulnerability
The propensity or predisposition to
be adversely affected by climate
change. Vulnerability encompasses
a variety of concepts and elements
including sensitivity or susceptibility
to harm and lack of capacity to cope
and adapt.
Co-benefits
The positive effects that a policy
or measure aimed at one objective
might have on other objectives,
thereby increasing the total benefits
for society or the environment1.
Consumption-Based Inventory
A consumption-based inventory
(CBI), or consumption-based
emissions inventory (CBEI), is a
calculation of all of the greenhouse
gas emissions associated with
producing, transporting, using, and
disposing of products and services
consumed by a particular community
or entity in a given time period
(typically a year). A CBEI is a way to
tally up a comprehensive emissions
‘footprint’ of a community2.
Decarbonization
The process by which countries,
individuals or other entities aim to
achieve zero fossil carbon existence.
Typically refers to a reduction of the
carbon emissions associated with
electricity, industry and transport1.
Drought
A period of abnormally dry weather
long enough to cause a serious
hydrological imbalance. Drought
is a relative term, therefore any
discussion in terms of precipitation
deficit must refer to the particular
precipitation-related activity that is
under discussion1.
Electric Vehicle
A vehicle whose propulsion is powered
fully or mostly by electricity1.
Equity
Equity is the principle of fairness
in burden sharing and is a basis
for understanding how the impacts
and responses to climate change,
including costs and benefits, are
distributed in and by society in more
or less equal ways. It is often aligned
with ideas of equality, fairness and
justice and applied with respect to
equity in the responsibility for, and
distribution of, climate impacts and
policies across society, generations,
and gender, and in the sense of
who participates and controls the
processes of decision-making3.
Global Warming
The estimated increase in global
mean surface temperature (GMST)
averaged over a 30-year period, or
the 30-year period centered on a
particular year or decade, expressed
relative to pre-industrial levels unless
otherwise specified2.
1 IPCC, 2018: Annex I: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R. (ed.)]. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of
1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M.
Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In Press
2 Urban Sustainability Directors Network website: What is a CBEI, retrieved 1.23.22 ATTACHMENT 2
368
Agenda Item # 9.
Glossary
APPENDIX C
104 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Green Infrastructure
The interconnected set of natural
and constructed ecological systems,
green spaces and other landscape
features. It includes planted and
indigenous trees, wetlands, parks,
green open spaces and original
grassland and woodlands, as well
as possible building and street-level
design interventions that incorporate
vegetation2.
Greenhouse Gas
Greenhouse gases are those gaseous
constituents of the atmosphere,
both natural and anthropogenic, that
absorb and emit radiation at specific
wavelengths within the spectrum of
terrestrial radiation emitted by the
Earth’s surface, the atmosphere itself
and by clouds. This property causes
the greenhouse effect2.
Heat Island Effect
Heat islands are urbanized areas that
experience higher temperatures than
outlying areas4.
Microgrid
A microgrid is a self-sufficient
energy system that serves a discrete
geographic footprint, such as a
college campus, hospital complex,
business center, or neighborhood5.
3 IPCC, 2018: Annex I: Glossary [Matthews, J.B.R. (ed.)]. In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of
1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M.
Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. In Press
4 US EPA website: Heat Island Effect, retrieved 1.23.22 5 Microgrid Knowledge website: What is a microgrid, retrieved 1.23.22 6 BayREN website: Reach Codes & Polices, retrieved 1.23.22 7 US EPA website: About Smart Growth, retrieved 1.23.22 8 Federal Transit Administration website: Transit-Oriented Development, retrieved 1.23.22 9 Federal Highway Administration website: Transportation Demand Management, retrieved 1.23.22 10 CA Public Utilities Commission website: Zero Net Energy, retrieved 1.23.22 Reach Code
In California, Title 24 of the
Code of Regulations sets the
building code standards for all
jurisdictions statewide. However,
local governments can adopt more
stringent requirements, which are
known as reach codes6.
Sustainability
A dynamic process that guarantees
the persistence of natural and human
systems in an equitable manner2.
Smart Growth
"Smart growth" covers a range
of development and conservation
strategies that help protect our
health and natural environment
and make our communities more
attractive, economically stronger, and
more socially diverse7.
Transit-Oriented Development
Transit-oriented development, or
TOD, includes a mix of commercial,
residential, office and entertainment
centered around or located near a
transit station. Dense, walkable,
mixed-use development near transit
attracts people and adds to vibrant,
connected communities8.
Transportation Demand
Management
Transportation demand management
(TDM), or simply demand
management, is defined a set of
strategies aimed at maximizing
traveler choices9.
Zero Net Energy Building
An energy-efficient building where,
on a source energy basis, the actual
annual consumed energy is less than
or equal to the on-site renewable
generated energy10.
ATTACHMENT 2
369
Agenda Item # 9.
ACTIONS LIST
APPENDIX D
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 105 Action Description
GHG
reductions
(MTCO2e)
1.1 A Fully implement the 2022 Complete
Streets Master Plan by 2035 and
make adjustments as needed to
comply with VMT reduction
objectives
Work closely with Complete Streets commission to fully implement the 2022 Complete Streets Master Plan by 2035, with a focus on specific measures to reduce VMT. Reassess the development of specific citywide protected bike corridors. Maintain and expand access to businesses while promoting slow streets with biking and walking access. Improve the safety and attractiveness of walking downtown through traffic calming, dedicated pedestrian trails and streets, accelerating the development of green downtown plazas, and other strategies. Fully implement all Safe Routes to School programs in the CSMP. Consider an ordinance to reduce speed limits.
2269
1.1 B Create a pedestrian-friendly
Downtown and other community
and commercial spaces throughout
the city
Establish Car-Free zones and one-way traffic Downtown and in other commercial and community areas to encourage non-vehicular travel. Expand sidewalk space and dedicate specific streets for pedestrian and cycling use only. Create safe, sheltered, outdoor areas for pedestrians and increase the number of bicycle racks for cyclists. Base development on 15-minute city principles. supportive of
1.1 A
1.1 C Develop and implement a new
Parking Management Plan that
supports strategic VMT reduction
Develop and implement a community-wide Parking Management Plan that reduces minimum requirements and sets upper limits on parking spaces for new development. Ensure the strategy is based on three principles:
increasing dedicated EV and handicapped parking spaces in key commercial areas, reducing the parking footprint (turn into green space), and add specific drop-off and pick up zones at strategic locations. Plan for street and parking lot changes to accommodate conversion to passenger pick-up and drop-off stops at commercial and other public land use locations.
1300
1.1 D Pilot shared bike, ebike, and
escooter programs, and partner with
adjacent cities to improve first/last
mile options
Develop pilot bike, ebike and escooter sharing programs by 2025. Expand programs by 2030 based on lessons learned. Explore regulations to promote the safe and responsible operation of ebikes and escooters including issuing permits to private companies and designating dedicated parking spaces at key locations. Partner with adjacent cities to enable first/last mile travel shuttles to train stations/commuter hubs, including regional networks of ebike, scooter, shuttle, and TNC routes.
255
1.2 A Support Transit-Oriented
Development
Require increased residential and commercial density and diversity along main corridors and commercial areas, including affordable multi-family housing and mixed-use developments. Encourage Transit-Oriented Development along major bus routes within and outside of the City to attract new employers and better serve the daily needs of residents and employees. Set a target of at least a 15% increase in the percent of the city’s population living in high-density Transit-Oriented Development by 2035. Integration with the City’s Housing Element (ensure meeting RHNA commitments encourages high-density & affordable housing in transitaccessible/walkable areas). 1206
1.2 B Encourage Live Near Work
incentives
Work with Los Altos employers and schools to develop a plan to provide affordable housing or rent assistance for employees to live close to work. Develop plans to offer rent assistance. Ensure new low-income and multiuse development is high density housing located no more than a 10-minute walk or bike ride from transit stops.
17 1.2 C Promote Work From Home policies
and infrastructure
Require new multifamily residential developments with 10 or more units to provide Work From Home spaces.
Support future conversion of commercial developments to residential uses as appropriate. Work with local Wi-Fi providers to expand coverage and speed.
735
1.3 A Develop an electric shuttle program
as an alternative to SOV travel
Work with local public and private organizations to develop an electric shuttle program for cross-town traffic, including "short hops" along main streets and key commercial areas. Explore autonomous options when the program is mature and expand as needed.
supportive
(grouped
strategy)
1.3 B Expand transit service, connectivity,
and transit stop amenities
Engage with transportation partners like VTA to expand zero emission transit service in City limits. Explore the creation of shaded and green commuter amenities and increased bicycle parking in order to help promote a public transit culture. Develop a green mobility app that would allow users to check on EV shuttle routes and arrival times, see where available bikes and scooters are and potentially reserve directly on the app. Include VTA transit routes and schedule, location of EV chargers and whether they’re free. Provide City funding or seek other funding sources to support these efforts.
1274
1.3 C Require commercial Transportation
Demand Management programs
Implement, mandate, enforce, actively promote, and use Transportation Demand Management strategies (TDM is defined as a set of strategies aimed at maximizing traveler choices). Require new nonresidential developments greater than 10,000 square feet or anticipated to include businesses with more than 50 employees to reduce VMT through TDM programs.
1275
1.3 D Work with Los Altos School Districts to
reduce VMT
Support a rotating car-free day program at local schools and as part of other local events to raise awareness about school commute alternatives. Encourage partnerships with private schools to develop and implement school bus programs that reduce school-related SOV commutes. Work with School Districts in Los Altos and surrounding cities (Mountain View, Palo Alto, Cupertino, Los Altos Hills) to encourage EV shuttle service for students living >1mile from their neighborhood schools. 1661
1.3 E Develop and promote community
carshare and carpool programs
Explore opportunities with carsharing companies to add or expand service in Los Altos. Develop a target number of shared cars available to individuals. Mandate that all shared vehicles be EV. Follow progress of shared autonomous vehicle testing regionally and consider developing ordinances and policies to guide shared AV use in City limits.
119
1.4 A Increase education & awareness of
available EV resources and incentive
programs
Develop a yearly EV fair with participation from local dealerships and owners. Develop a map of the city charging network and available dedicated parking spaces. Create a webinar series on EV ownership. supportive of
1.4 B
1.4 B Actively promote EV adoption and
require EV-only parking
Negotiate a discount program with local car dealerships to offer rebates or other incentives to car buyers purchasing new or used EVs. Require businesses to set aside a percentage of parking spaces for EVs. 6854
1.5 A Increase the number of available
Level 2 EV charging stations in
workplace, commercial and
multifamily areas
Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging stations at businesses with >50 employees, multifamily homes of >10 units, and in commercial areas.
supportive of
1.4 B
1.5 B Create a citywide network of DC
Fast Charging (DCFC) stations
Create a network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations Downtown and in other commercial areas, as well as along major vehicle corridors. Set a 1-mile target for DCFC stations. Engage local gas stations to explore conversion to DCFC centers.
supportive of
1.4 B
Focus Area: Transportation
Mitigation Actions
Focus Area: Transportation
Action #
Goal: Accelerate Community-Wide Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Sufficient to Support 80% EVs Strategy: Reduce City-Wide Vehicle Miles Traveled by 25% by 2035 Goal: Create a Walkable and Bikeable City
Goal: Promote Smart Growth Strategies
Goal: Support Shared Mobility
Strategy: Electrify Transportation
Goal: Reach 80% Community-Wide Electric Vehicles Adoption by 2035 ATTACHMENT 2
370
Agenda Item # 9.
106 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Action Description
GHG
reductions
(MTCO2e)
1.5 C Double the current Electric Vehicle
charging and pre-wiring
requirements in future Reach Code
updates
Continue the current requirements for EV pre-wiring and Level 2 charging in new single-family development and extend to include large remodels and additions, and double the requirements for new multi-family and commercial development as part of future Reach Code updates supportive of
1.4 B
1.5 D Identify grants and incentives to
install residential EV charging
including DCFC, solar EV charging,
and paired EV charging + battery
storage systems
Identify grants and incentives available through State, federal, or local agencies that may be used to support solar EV charging and battery storage. Work with SVCE to expand existing EV resources and programs. supportive of
1.4 B
1.6 A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines
such as landscaping and
construction equipment
Accelerate phase out small off-road fossil fuel engines such as landscaping equipment through bans, replacement ordinances, and/or incentives for electric alternatives. Work to reduce construction-related GHG emissions.
1319
2.1 A Support 3rd party residential and
commercial energy audits
Provide resources to support energy audits including listing of approved providers, listing of incentives programs, and other resources. Work with approved providers to perform energy audits. supportive
2.1 B Increase residential and commercial
energy efficiency
Develop a program to increase energy efficiency in existing residential buildings including wall and ceiling insulation, roof replacements, new ducting and windows, lighting upgrades, and outdoor amenities upgrades.
Identify outside funding and provide City funding to perform upgrades identified in energy audits performed under action 2.1 A, and ensure eligible residents and businesses take advantage of all available energy efficiency incentive programs.
6163
2.2 A Adopt evolving Reach Codes and
expand to include large additions
and major remodels
Adopt Reach Codes that go beyond Title 24 standards during every code cycle, including Zero Net Energy (ZNE) requirements. Expand new building codes to include large remodels and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). 8999
2.3 A Accelerate residential HVAC
replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) units in existing residential buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance for HVAC replacements. Develop a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for HVAC units. Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory to replace all methane gas HVAC units with electric alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income residents and Seniors. Provide education and outreach to residents and property owners.
18869
2.3 B Accelerate residential water heater
replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas hot water heaters in existing residential buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance for water heater replacements. Develop a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for water heaters. Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory to replace all methane gas water heaters with electric alternatives by 2035, with exemptions for low-income residents and Seniors. Provide education and outreach to residents and property owners. 16780
2.3 C Accelerate commercial HVAC
replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas HVAC units in existing commercial buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance for HVAC replacements. Waive permit fees for electric HVAC units. Consider a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for HVAC units.
Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory to replace methane gas HVAC units with electric alternatives by 2035.
1310
2.3 D Accelerate commercial water
heater replacements
Develop a program to replace methane gas hot water heaters in existing commercial buildings with electric alternatives. Require permits and enforce compliance for water heater replacements. Waive permit fees for electric water heaters. Consider a "Replace upon Burnout" and "Replace upon Sale/Remodel" ordinance for water heaters. Adopt an ordinance making it mandatory to replace methane gas water heaters with electric alternatives by 2035.
1193
2.4 A Establish a fee or penalty on the use
of methane gas
Work with PG&E and community partners to develop or expand a fee on the use of methane gas within City limits. Set up a City-led Task Force in 2022 to lead this effort. Funds collected will be used to fund incentives for electric appliances adoption. Potential estimated funds available each year of at least $500k. supportive
2.5 A Increase community solar capacity Increase solar panel requirements in new construction from 4KWh to 6KWh minimum, and add solar panel requirement for large additions and remodels (>4KWh). Ensure residents and businesses are aware of and take advantage of incentive programs for solar panels.
1 2.5 B Adopt Net Zero Building
requirements for new construction
by 2030
Adopt Net Zero Building requirements following New Building Institute guidelines by 2030. Add requirements of 12 kW or more to future Reach Code updates by 2030 at the latest. Encourage battery storage systems of 10 kW or more through promotion of incentive or rebate programs, educational campaigns, and/or pilot programs. Encourage participation in demand response programs to improve grid resiliency. 2 3.1 A Increase the landfill diversion rate Increase landfill diversion rate to 90% by 2030 and 95% by 2035, negotiated in the next Franchise Agreement.
Launch an education and awareness campaign for residents and businesses to help promote best practices. 421
3.1 B Eliminate non-essential single-use
plastics
Adopt a new ordinance to eliminate non-essential single-use plastics and prioritize reusable foodware and utensils. Ensure all new single-use foodware and utensils are compostable per guidelines from the Franchise Waste Hauler.
supportive
3.1 C Reduce waste from demolition,
construction and building materials
Develop an ordinance requiring the deconstruction of old buildings instead of demolition and the recycling/reuse of materials. Provide incentives to builders for the use of environmentally friendly construction materials.1 Action #
Mitigation Actions
Focus Area: Transportation Focus Area: Energy Focus Area: Resource Conservation Goal: Reduce or Eliminate of Methane Gas Use in Existing Buildings by Increasing Fuel Switching Goal: Disincentivize Methane Gas
Goal: Expand Community Solar and Battery Storage
Strategy: Increase Solar Energy Production
Strategy: Reduce Consumption and Waste
Goal: Decrease Landfill Waste 15% and Eliminate Single-Use Plastics and Construction Waste by 2035 Strategy: Electrify Off-Road Mobile Sources
Goal: Eliminate Off-Road Fossil Fuel Engines
Strategy: Reduce Emissions from Energy Consumption
Goal: Encourage energy conservation measures in homes and businesses Goal: Require All-Electric New Buildings and Major Retrofits
APPENDIX D
ATTACHMENT 2
371
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 107 Action Description
GHG
reductions
(MTCO2e)
3.2 A Increase communitywide water
efficiency
Increase education and awareness of water efficiency programs through Calwater and other organizations.
Continue to support implementation of the 2015 UWMP through enforcement of the 2015 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Develop an ordinance requiring conversion of grass lawns to low-water landscaping.
Consider an update to the building code prohibiting new grass lawns. 78 3.3 A Promote sustainable food choices Expand consumer education and awareness of sustainable and plant-based food choices through City media channels, speaker series, and other methods. Work with the current vendor to expand the farmers market into a year-round event. Work with local restaurants to increase organic, vegetarian, and farm-to-table menu options and reduce food waste.
supportive
3.3 B Encourage responsible goods &
services consumption
Increase education & awareness of circular economy concepts, including responsible purchasing habits and the promotion of a Repair, Reuse, Recovery, and Refurbishment economy. Provide support and resources to help local businesses participate in green business programs. supportive
4.1 A Audit appropriate City facilities and
conduct comprehensive energy
efficiency upgrades
Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades focusing on energyefficient lighting, motion sensors, appliances, and HVAC systems. Develop a 10-year phase-out program in which all existing methane gas appliances are replaced with comparable electric alternatives. 118
4.2 A Build new City buildings to Net Zero
standards
Ensure all new buildings are Net Zero with solar panels, battery storage and electric efficient appliances. Align with CA Public Utilities Commission Zero Net Energy goals and definitions. supportive
4.2 B Develop battery storage options
and evaluate microgrids for cost
savings and resilience
Install ground- or roof-mounted solar panels at select City buildings and facilities. Explore options, including local examples at fire stations, for microgrids capable of going into "island mode" and serving as resilience hubs during power outages.
supportive
4.3 A Develop a phase-out schedule to
replace all City-owned fleet vehicles
with electric vehicles
Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all City-owned fleet vehicles with comparable electric versions by 2030. Conduct a feasibility study to determine the optimal number and location of municipal and public chargers at City facilities and properties, and install sufficient Level 2 charging to charge EV fleet and staffowned EVs. 146
4.4 A Improve City staff use of commute
alternatives to single-occupant
vehicles
Increase options for commute alternatives, including information and materials that identify available transit and alternative transportation routes. Encourage staff to buy and use EVs through incentives, free charging at City facilities, and incentives for EV purchases.
5 4.4 B Expand Work From Home and
flexible schedule policies
Expand the current policy to facilitate alternative work schedule or telecommuting options for City staff to reduce daily commute trips. Evaluate flexible employee schedules that allow for at least 50% remote work while maintaining City hours of operation.
9 4.5 A Adopt a zero-waste policy for City
facilities and City-sponsored events
Adopt a policy that requires City-owned buildings and facilities to be zero waste. Develop an action plan to eliminate waste through diversion and recycling. Work with event vendors and participants to eliminate waste at City-sponsored events.
89 4.5 B Continue to allow virtual
participation in public meetings
Decrease community Vehicle Miles Traveled by continuing to allow virtual participation at all public meetings.
Allow for public comment by virtual participants.
supportive
4.6 A Account for climate change in all
new City projects
Establish an interdepartmental working group to integrate climate preparedness in planning, maintenance, and capital improvements though the development of work plans, screening of capital improvements, and cross-sector collaboration. Establish protocols for mitigating public health impacts from heat and air quality with regional agencies and partners.
n/a
4.6 B Incorporate climate preparedness
into City programs, operations, and
maintenance protocols
Ensure that maintenance reflects expected future climate conditions and variability and not historical climate data for all City buildings, facilities, structures, and infrastructure. n/a
4.6 C Integrate CAAP goals into City
projects as an order of business
Integrate annual CAAP goals during the budget review process at the direction of the City Manager. Plan to inventory City GHG emissions every two years using ClearPath and track against targets. n/a
5.1 A Create water-efficient buildings and
landscapes
Update building code to incentivize rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling. Install systems at municipal facilities. Develop resources to help residents purchase water-saving equipment, and encourage rainwater harvesting strategies. Adopt mandatory guidelines requiring a set of stormwater and greywater management features in new construction. Implement porous paving in parking lots and driveways, and other water percolation methods like bioswales to reduce stormwater runoff to streets. Utilize reissuance of City’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit starting July 2022 to lower threshold for regulation.
Partner with local and global organizations to identify space and resources to enhance the natural environment and rural feel of the city.
supportive
5.1 B Develop a partnership with the
Regional Water Quality Control Plant
to use recycled water from the plant
Work with the Wastewater Treatment Plant to implement upgrades to provide a drought resilient, local water supply to increase the amount of recycled water production. n/a
5.2 A Increase urban tree canopy Set a goal of at least 10,000 new City trees by 2035. Develop a city-wide Green Infrastructure Plan. 11
5.2 B Expand parks and natural wooded
spaces
Work with community partners to expand the number and size of parks and wooded spaces within City limits. supportive
5.2 C Pilot carbon farming opportunities Identify land to plant intensive urban forests following the Miyawaki Method. Explore opportunities to develop carbon farming pilots for carbon sequestration. Partner with local organizations with available greenspace. supportive
5.2 D Eliminate the use of non-organic
pesticides and herbicides
Ban the use of non-organic pesticides and herbicides throughout City green spaces. Develop education and incentivization programs for residents about use of alternatives to synthetic pesticides and herbicides. supportive
Action #
Mitigation Actions Cross-Cutting Actions
Focus Area: Resource Conservation Focus Area: Municipal Operations Focus Area: Green Community Goal: Expand Green Infrastructure & Improve Water Resilience Goal: Sequester As Much Remaining Carbon As Possible by 2035 Strategy: Integrate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Functions Goal: Incorporate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Policy, Budget, Planning, & Internal Standards Strategy: Develop Nature-Based Solutions
Strategy: Reduce Municipal VMT
Goal: Convert 100% of the City's Fleet to Electric Vehicles by 2030 Goal: Develop Guidelines for Sustainable Employee Commute and Business Travel Strategy: Promote Green Municipal Practices
Goal: Prioritize Responsible Procurement
Goal: Utilize Digital and Remote Systems to reduce VMT
Goal: Reduce Water Use At Least 15% by 2030
Goal: Promote a Circular Economy
Strategy: Operate Sustainable Municipal Buildings
Goal: Reduce Municipal Building Energy Use 30% by 2035
Goal: Install Solar + Battery Storage at City facilities
APPENDIX D
ATTACHMENT 2
372
Agenda Item # 9.
108 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Action Description
GHG
reductions
(MTCO2e)
6.1 A Update city wide flood risk
assessment and capital and policy
recommendations
The hydraulic analyses that form FEMA's FIRM (Flood Insurance Rate Map) are decades old. Hire a company to perform hydraulic analyses of existing creek crossings and culverts to determine how many, if any, are undersized based on changing precipitation patterns (climate is typically based on 30-year data cycles).
Replace/rebuild undersized culverts and creek crossings as needed. Work with FEMA to update the FIRMs. n/a
6.1 B Develop and implement
comprehensive riparian ecosystem
restoration plan and relevant
floodplain management policies
Work with Valley Water to revitalize and restore creeks, learning from case studies like Adobe Creek Reach 5 Restoration. Restore the riparian ecosystem of creeks flowing through Los Altos, add managed ponds and dams to slow the flow of water, and increase percolation to the ground. Increase natural floodplain management through policies and education to establish "Buffer Zones" and limit new construction. n/a
6.1 C Expand green infrastructure program
to reduce impermeable surface
areas and capture runoff from
paved areas
Implement porous paving in sidewalks, parking lots and driveways, and other water percolation methods like bioswales to reduce stormwater runoff to streets.
n/a
6.2 A Conduct heat study/mapping to
identify areas of Urban Heat Island
Conduct heat study/mapping to identify areas of Urban Heat Island with capital and policy recommendations. n/a
6.2 B Enact reflectivity standards for
asphalt and ground level surfaces;
enact reflectivity/green roof
standards for roofs
Require light-colored roofs and/or a minimum specified reflectance for commercial roofs when new or at replacement. Explore and implement guidelines to resurface streets and sidewalks with heat reflective surfaces.
n/a
6.2 C Promote alternative building cooling
strategies; enact standards
Promote alternative cooling strategies like shade trees, green roofs, and building awnings. Determine and enact standards for new buildings
n/a
7.1 A Develop temperature/heat safety
protocols for outdoor work.
Determine education and
enforcement mechanisms.
Adjust construction policies to allow extended work hours (earlier or later than usual) to avoid peak daytime heat. Adjust/extend construction hours in Ordinance 6.16 Noise Control, Section 70 Prohibited Acts during heat waves to avoid peak daytime heat. Work with community groups and residents to determine best methods of outreach and communication with outdoor workers. Educate employers and workers about existing worker rights and protections and ways to protect outdoor workers from the effects of extreme heat n/a
7.1 B Adjust/extend park and public
facility hours during heat waves
Adjust park facility hours to discourage active recreation during peak periods and extend open hours to early morning/late evening. Develop community cooling centers at City and non- City sites. Ensure temporary shade structures are provided for community events.
n/a
7.1 C Expand public drinking
fountains/refillable water stations
Locate at bus stops, Downtown shopping areas, trailheads, community centers, and sport courts/fields. n/a
7.2 A Update wildfire warning and
evacuation protocols
Ensure existing alert systems and safety measures are updated to address increasing climate risk and vulnerable, not easily mobile populations.
n/a
7.2 B Develop an early warning system for
air quality alerts
Partner with regional agencies to make wildfire and air quality prediction data widely used and accessible to all, including through an early warning system. If not feasible, develop Los Altos-specific warning system based on available and accessible data.
n/a
7.2 C Ensure high-air-quality indoor spaces
and purchase and distribute N-95
masks to vulnerable outdoor
populations
Two-pronged strategy to retrofit and/or install air filtration systems on resilience hubs, schools, and other facilities. Separately, provide face masks to filter air for outdoor workers and other vulnerable populations who need to be outdoors before and during bad-air-quality days. n/a
8.1 A Identify, fund, and prepare existing
and new public facilities to serve as
resilience hubs
Conduct interviews with facility staff to determine their resilience to extreme heat, power outages, floods, and poor air quality. Compile and analyze to help prioritize investments and coordination. Identify suitable locations for/upgrade evacuation centers to serve as resilience hubs, safe zones, cooling centers, etc., depending on the event, with the capabilities to provide disaster assistance. n/a
8.2 A Develop outreach to and
comprehensive care strategy for
vulnerable populations.
Conduct survey of and outreach to vulnerable populations (e.g. isolated seniors, outdoor workers, long-term care residents) and the people and institutions that care for them. Collaborate with community-based organizations to develop an inventory of locations with isolated seniors and develop a plan for a social support network during heat waves, bad air quality days, and other emergencies. Plan should include orders of assistance, including temporarily moving vulnerable populations to and from resilience hubs. n/a
8.3 A Update Community Emergency
Response Training (CERT) to include
growing climate hazards
Form partnerships with neighborhood-based organizations and businesses to develop Neighborhood Resilience Hub programs and prepare residents and respond to climate change. Develop community outreach and engagement materials.
n/a
8.3 B Launch a Community Climate
Action Grant
Establish an annual micro-grant program to support local citizen-led projects and programs that will reduce emissions, adapt to climate change and enhance equity.
n/a
Action #
Cross-Cutting Actions Adaptation Actions
Focus Area: Emergency Management Focus Area: Resilient Community Focus Area: Climate Risk Goal: Reduce Heat Risk
Goal: Identify and Protect Vulnerable Community Members Goal: Improve Climate Literacy & Risk Understanding
Strategy: Integrate Adaptation into Emergency Preparedness, Response Goal: Ensure Safety During Extreme Heat
Goal: Ensure Safety During Wildfires & Unhealthy Air Events Strategy: Educate and Protect Residents
Goal: Establish Resilience Hubs
Strategy: Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
Goal: Reduce Flood Risk
APPENDIX D
ATTACHMENT 2
373
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 109 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 115 1 Technical Appendix
APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL APPENDIX
This appendix contains a brief summary of changes between 2005 and 2018 emissions, as well as the data sources, assumptions, and methodologies used in the development of the CAAP.
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Results
Los Altos’ 2018 inventory is actually comprised of two inventories, one for the community and one for municipal operations. The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) provides protocols for both, which were used for these inventories. A base year of 2018 was chosen based on data quality and availability.
Based on ICLEI guidance and in keeping with the 2013 CAP, the sectors included in the community inventory were:
• Transportation
o On-road emissions
o Off-road emissions
• Energy
o Residential energy
o Commercial energy
• Solid waste
• Water & wastewater
The sectors included in the municipal inventory were:
• Building energy
• Vehicle fleet
• Employee commute
• Solid waste
• Water & wastewater
• Streetlights & traffic signals
• Fugitive emissions
The most recent emissions factors for each source category were determined, and multiplied by the activity data to arrive at metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e). Results of these inventories show that Los Altos emitted 111,330 emissions in 2018, 110,202 arising from the community and 1,128 from municipal operations.
Of the community emissions, 63,288 came from the transportation sector, 43,198 from the energy sector, 2,653 from waste, and 1,063 from water and wastewater pumping and treatment. Of the municipal operations, 445 came from employee commute to and from work, 351 came from the City’s vehicle fleet, 172 came from solid waste, 134 from energy use, and 26 from all other sources.
When comparing 2005 and 2018 emissions, an overall reduction of 73,395 emissions was achieved, a reduction of 40 percent, exceeding the City’s 2020 reduction target by 25 percent.
A large percentage of emissions reductions between 2013-2018 came as a result of joining the local Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) electricity provider. Silicon Valley Clean
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
APPENDIX E
ATTACHMENT 2
374
Agenda Item # 9.
110 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 2 APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL APPENDIX CONTINUED
Energy (SVCE). In addition to joining SVCE, Los Altos’ government has upgraded all City accounts to GreenPrime, SVCE’s 100% renewable generation service. The remaining reductions came as a result of increases in fuel economy, increased renewable energy used in wastewater treatment at the regional treatment facility, and the effects of actions adopted as part of the 2013 CAP.
The largest source of 2018 municipal emissions was from employees commuting to and from work, creating 445 tons of CO2e. However, the volume of emissions created decreased from 697 MTCO2e in 2005 to 445 MTCO2e in 2018, most likely attributable to the increase in vehicle fuel efficiency over that time. Next were emissions from the City’s fleet of vehicles with 351 MTCO2e, then emissions from city-owned buildings and facilities with 134 MTCO2e, and then emissions from solid waste, water and wastewater treatment, and fugitive emissions with 198 MTCO2e combined. Emissions from streetlights and traffic signals were reduced to zero with the upgrade of all City accounts to GreenPrime.
The largest source of community emissions was from transportation and mobile sources, resulting in 63,288 MTCO2e. Overall though, emissions from transportation were reduced from 96,610 MTCO2e to 63,288 MTCO2e, a decrease of 34 percent. This decrease can likely be attributed to increases in fuel efficiency, increased electric vehicle adoption, and actions taken as part of the 2013 CAP. Next were emissions from residential and commercial energy, creating 35,661 and 7,537 MTCO2e respectively, then emissions from solid waste with 2,653 MTCO2e, and then water and wastewater treatment with 1,063 MTCO2e.
Joining SVCE helped reduce emissions from energy by 34 percent between 2005 and 2018.
The remaining emissions came from a combination of natural gas, non-SVCE electricity customers, and the small percentage of non-renewable electricity supplied in 2018 by SVCE.
Overall, these results reflect a shift away from electricity production as a major source of emissions, with transportation and natural gas use by buildings remaining as large sources.
Emissions from solid waste continue to decrease as diversion rates increase, and emissions from water and wastewater treatment decrease as the efficiency of processing equipment and renewable energy use both increase over time.
On the municipal side, employee commute is still the largest source of emission, but is somewhat beyond the direct control of the City and can be difficult to influence.
Electrification of the vehicle fleet and the greening of City-owned building and facilities has reduced municipal emissions, but there is still room for improvement in these areas which are addressed in the 2022 CAAP.
Business-As-Usual Forecast
A business-as-usual (BAU) forecast was developed in order to see what the City’s emissions might be in the future. By developing a set of forecasts using the inventory results as a baseline, the City was able to better understand what the remaining sources may be and how many emissions will need to be reduced to meet their climate goals. In general, community emissions were escalated by the rate of population growth, and municipal emissions were escalated by the rate of growth in number of households. Both assumptions are consistent with ICLEI guidance. Absent any other changes, the City’s emissions would increase slowly from 117,631 to over time as the population grows.
116 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
APPENDIX E TECHNICAL APPENDIX
ATTACHMENT 2
375
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX E TECHNICAL APPENDIX
3 Adjusted Business-As-Usual Forecast
In addition to the BAU forecast, an adjusted business-as-usual (ABAU) forecast was developed to include the impacts of federal, State, and local actions already underway, as well as the expected increase in EV adoption rates and expected increase in AC use due to climate change.
An ABAU + Impacts of Existing Actions was also developed to model the effects of actions taken as part of the 2013 CAP. The following carbon intensity factors were applied to each forecast series to arrive at the ABAU and the ABAU + Impacts of Existing Actions forecasts.
Sector Carbon Intensity Factors
Residential electricity Impacts of Title 24 + Increase in AC use Commercial electricity Impacts of Title 24 + Increase in AC use Community transportation EV adoption increase + Impacts of Pavley II standard The ABAU forecast shows that, including the impacts of federal, State, and local actions and the impacts of EV adoption and AC use increase, the City’s emissions would be expected to decrease to 70,793 MTCO2e by 2050.
The Table of Methodology & Assumptions is contained in the following pages APPENDIX C: TECHNICAL APPENDIX CONTINUED
118 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 111 ATTACHMENT 2
376
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX E TECHNICAL APPENDIX
Action
#
Quantification
method(s)
Assumptions GHG calculations Cost source/methodology
1.1 A ClearPath, CAPCOA
SDT-1, CAPCOA SDT-2
-3.3 person trips/day, avg. trip length
6 miles, 3.7% increase in bicycle mode
share
-Assumes 1.4% VMT reduction
-Assumes 1% VMT reduction
trips x trip length x increased
mode share
Baseline VMT x % reduction
Baseline VMT x % reduction
CSMP
1.1 B CAPCOA SDT-4
(grouped strategy)
n/a n/a 0.1 FTE to develop and maintain program
Assumed $25k consultant fee to design
outdoor pedestrian areas
Assumed 2 miles of bike lane at $25k/mile
Assumed 5k sqft new sidewalk at $5/sqft
Assumed 20 bus stops at $2k/stop
1.1 C CAPCOA PDT-1, 2
and 3
Assumes 5.0% VMT reduction Baseline VMT x % reduction Assumed $400k to develop PMP
1.1 D CAPCOA TRT-12, SDT4, SDT-5 and LUT-9
Assumes 1% VMT reduction Baseline VMT x % reduction Assumed $25k consultant fee to design programs
0.1 FTE to adminsiter program
0.05 FTE/year to engage with partners
1.2 A ClearPath Assumes 100% of population currently
medium-high population density
Based on at least 15% shift to
high-density
0.25 FTE/year to develop and adminsiter
program
1.2 B CAPCOA LUT-6 Assumes 0.4% VMT reduction Baseline VMT x % reduction 0.1 FTE/year Assumed 500 employees are low-income
Assumed $500 incentive per employee
1.2 C CAPCOA TRT-6 Assumes 5.5% commute VMT
reduction
5.5 x 0.2 (% of work trips) x
1.21 (avg. work trip
length/avg. trip length)
0.1 FTE to develop and implement program
(assume program is maintained 10 years
and then is self-sufficient)
0.1 FTE to work with local wifi providers
1.3 A CAPCOA TST-6 grouped strategy n/a Based on a survey of other CA programs
1.3 B CAPCOA TST-2, 3 and
4 Assumes 5% VMT reduction Baseline VMT x % reduction 0.05 FTE/year to engage partners Assumed $25k consultant fee for Green
Commuter Amenities plan
Assumed $50k for green mobility app
1.3 C target
recommended by
Fehr & Peers
5% VMT reduction target Baseline VMT x % reduction 0.5 FTE/year to develop, implement, and enforce TDM program
1.3 D CAP 2013 Assumes 50% of youth ride bus, 3
miles/trip
Youth not riding bus x trip
length x number of
events/year
0.2 FTE
1.3 E CAPCOA TRT-9 Assumes 0.4% VMT reduction Baseline VMT x % reduction 0.05 FTE/year to engage carsharing companies and follow AV progress
1.4 A GHG reductions
included in 1.4 B
n/a n/a 0.1 FTE/year to develop and administer
programs
Assumed $3,000 to develop EV fair
Assumed $2,000 to develop webinar series
1.4 B ClearPath Assumes 30% increase in EV adoption
beyond ABAU to 80%
Assumes 23.6 MPG average fleetwide
fuel economy
Assumes 99 MPG average EV fuel
economy (includes 45% hybrid)
Percent change in EV x
change in fuel economy x
Percent of gas vehicles
displaced
Assumed $50,000 in incentives
0.1 FTE to develop program (1-time cost)
0.1 FTE/year to administer program for 10
years
1.5 A supportive of 1.4 B n/a 20 public chargers/year x percharger VMT reduction 50 private chargers/year x
per-charger VMT reduction
0.1 FTE to develop ordinance
0.1 FTE/year to administer program
1.5 B supportive of 1.4 B n/a n/a 0.2 FTE/year to develop and implement program
Assumes $50k per charger
1.5 C supportive of 1.4 B n/a 10 new public chargers/year x per-charger VMT reduction
0.1 FTE
1.5 D supportive of 1.4 B n/a n/a 0.05 FTE/year to research funding opportunities and engage with partners
1.6 A CAP 2013 n/a n/a 0.1 FTE to develop and administer program Assumed 1,000 leaf blowers replaced
Assumed $50 incentive per leaf blower
Mitigation Actions
112 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
377
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX E TECHNICAL APPENDIX
Action
#
Quantification
method(s)
Assumptions GHG calculations Cost source/methodology
2.1 A GHG reductions
included in 2.1 B
n/a n/a 0.2 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
Assumed $500/audit
Assumed 100 incentives/year
2.1 B Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 665 units retrofitted/year
Assumes an average of 1,462 kWh
and 1,070 therm savings/year/unit
Number of appliances
replaced x per-appliance
savings (cumulative)
0.5 FTE
Assumes $1,000 per incentive
Assumes 100 incentives/year
2.2 A Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 14 new MFD or retrofits/year
Assumes 417 kWh savings per MFD
Assumes 150 new SFD or retrofits/year
Assumes 165 kWh savings per SFD
Number of new or retrofitted
MFD/SFD x per-MFD/SFD
increase/decrease
(cumulative)
0.1 FTE to develop ordinances
2.3 A Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 665 HVACs replaced/year
Assumes an average of 2,370 kWh
increase and 319 therm
decrease/unit/year
Units replaced x per-unit
savings (cumulative)
0.25 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
Assumed $5k for seminars and educational
material
2.3 B Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 665 DHWs replaced/year
Assumes an average of 1,416 kWh
increase and 239 therm
decrease/unit/year
Units replaced x per-unit
savings (cumulative)
0.25 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
Assumed $5k for seminars and educational
material
2.3 C Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 43 small business and 36
medium-sized business HVACs
replaced/year
Assumes all hotel HVACs replaced by
2035
Assumes an average of 4,980 kWh
increase and 575 therm
decrease/unit/year
Units replaced x per-unit
savings (cumulative)
0.25 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
Assumed $5k for seminars and educational
material
2.3 D Built Environment
Calculator
Assumes 43 small business and 36
medium-sized business HVACs
replaced/year
Assumes all hotel DHWs replaced by
2035
Assumes an average of 4,312 kWh
increase and 519 therm
decrease/unit/year
Units replaced x per-unit
savings (cumulative)
0.25 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
Assumed $5k for seminars and educational
material
2.4 A n/a n/a 0.1 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
2.5 A ClearPath Installed kWh x electricity
emissions factor
0.05 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
2.5 B Built Environment
Calculator
Installed kWh x electricity
emissions factor
0.05 FTE/year to develop and administer
program
3.1 A ClearPath Assumes a 17% increase in waste
diversion (78% to 95%)
Tons diverted x per-ton
emissions factor
0.2 FTE
3.1 B n/a n/a n/a 0.1 FTE to develop ordinance
3.1 C grouped strategy
(GHG reductions
included in 3.1 A)
n/a 0.1 FTE to develop ordinance
0.1 FTE/year for monitoring & compliance
Assumes $1,000 per incentive
Assumes 100 incentives/year
3.2 A CAP 2013 n/a kWh reduction x electricity
emissions factor
0.1 FTE to develop ordinance
0.1 FTE/year for outreach & education
3.3 A n/a n/a n/a 0.1 FTE/year to develop and expand
programs, permitting, signage, etc.
3.3 B no methodology n/a n/a 0.10 FTE/year for outreach & education
4.1 A CAP 2013 Assumes 30% reduction in energy use kWh/therm reduction x kWh/therm emissions factors
Estimated $60k per building, for 10 buildings
4.2 A no data n/a n/a 0.1 FTE to develop guidelines
4.2 B City's electricity is
carbon-free; no GHG
reductions
n/a n/a Assumed $40k for solar + storage installation
Assumed $2.1M for 1MW of microgrid
capacity
0.05 FTE/year to monitor system
4.3 A ClearPath Assumes current 22 MPG for fleet
Assumes fleet mileage grows at rate
of household growth
Change in fuel economy x
change in VMT replaced
0.1 FTE/year to administer program
Assumed $500k incremental cost of EVs
Assumed $100k in EVSE
4.4 A CAPCOA TRT-1 Assumes 2% VMT reduction VMT reduction x per-mile emissions factor
Assumed total cash incentives of $10k
0.05 FTE/year to develop and administer
programs
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 113 ATTACHMENT 2
378
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX E TECHNICAL APPENDIX
Action
#
Quantification
method(s)
Assumptions GHG calculations Cost source/methodology
4.4 B CAPCOA TRT-6 Assumes 5.5% employee commute
VMT reduction
VMT reduction x per-mile
emissions factor
0.05 FTE to develop program
4.5 A CAP 2013 Assumes 100% waste diversion Tons diverted x per-ton emissions factor
0.05 FTE to develop program
4.5 B n/a n/a n/a
4.6 A n/a n/a n/a
4.6 B n/a n/a n/a
4.6 C n/a n/a n/a
5.1 A n/a n/a n/a 0.05 FTE/year to develop and administer programs
5.1 B n/a n/a n/a
5.2 A CAP 2013 Assumes 10,000 new trees by 2035 # of new trees x per-tree energy savings
Assumes $300/tree
0.5 FTE/year
to administer program
5.2 B n/a n/a n/a
5.2 C n/a n/a n/a 0.1 FTE/year to identify partners and develop program
5.2 D n/a n/a n/a 0.05 FTE to develop ordinance
6.1 A n/a n/a n/a
6.1 B n/a n/a n/a
6.1 C n/a n/a n/a Assumes $300,000 per impervious acre
managed. Memo from Geosyntec
consultants (2018) estimates an average
range of $100-200K/acre impervious area
treated with green infrastructure. The Santa
Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution
Prevention Program's Stormwater Resource
Plan (2019) lists a range of $35K-$600K/acre
impervious area treated with green
infrastructure. Lower costs are typically for
much larger sites like stormwater detention
ponds.
6.2 A n/a n/a n/a
6.2 B n/a n/a n/a
6.2 C n/a n/a n/a
7.1 A n/a n/a n/a
7.1 B n/a n/a n/a
7.1 C n/a n/a n/a
7.2 A n/a n/a n/a
7.2 B n/a n/a n/a
7.2 C n/a n/a n/a
8.1 A n/a n/a n/a
8.2 A n/a n/a n/a
8.3 A n/a n/a n/a
8.3 B n/a n/a n/a
Cross-Cutting Actions Adaptation Actions
114 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
379
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 115 Action # Implementation lead Implementation partners Estimated cost Funding source(s) Funding program(s)
1.1 A
Engineering Finance/Executive $ 44,778,000
Caltrans
U.S. DOT
Calbike
Active Transportation Program
Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program
Funding Sources list
1.1 B
Engineering/Planning
Chamber of Commerce
$ 215,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
Program
Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grants
1.1 C
Planning/Engineering
Environmental Commission/
Complete Streets
Commission/ Planning
Commission $ 400,000 BAAQMD
Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
Program
1.1 D
Economic Development Engineering $ 135,000
1.2 A
Planning Commission/Planning
VTA
$ 300,000
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission Transportation project grants
1.2 B
Executive/Sustianability Chamber of Commerce $ 380,000
1.2 C
Economic Development Chamber of Commerce $ 110,000
1.3 A
Economic Development $ 250,000
BAAQMD
Caltrans
Caltrans
Vehicle Trip Reduction Grant
Program
Active Transportation Program
Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grants
1.3 B
Engineering/Planning
VTA
$ 140,000
Metropolitan
Transportation Commission Transportation project grants
1.3 C
Sustainability/Economic
Development
Neighboring jurisdictions
$ 650,000
Mitigation Actions
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
380
Agenda Item # 9.
116 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
1.3 D
Complete Streets Commission/
Planning Commission Planning $ 200,000
1.3 E
Parks & Recreation/Economic
Development
Executive/
Los Altos School District
$ 5,000
1.4 A
Economic
Development/Sustainability Finance $ 15,000
1.4 B
Economic
Development/Sustainability
SVCE
$ 160,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (technical
assistance)
CARB
U.S. DOT
FutureFit Assist
Clean Vehicle Rebate Project
RAISE grants
1.5 A
Economic Development Executive $ 140,000
CA Energy Commission
U.S. DOE
California Electric Vehicle
Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP)
Electric Vehicle Supply
Equipment Loan and Rebate
Program (small businesses)
1.5 B
Economic
Development/Executive
SVCE
$ 1,350,000
CA Energy Commission
U.S. DOE
California Electric Vehicle
Infrastructure Project (CALeVIP)
Electric Vehicle Supply
Equipment Loan and Rebate
Program (small businesses)
1.5 C
Sustainability/Economic
Development/Engineering
SVCE
$ 10,000
1.5 D
Planning Commission Sustainability/Building $ 50,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy (informational
resource) eHub
1.6 A
Sustainability/Planning
SVCE
$ 150,000
2.1 A
Maintenance Services BAAQMD/SVCE $ 900,000
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
381
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 117
2.1 B
Building/Planning
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 63,000
PG&E
PG&E
BayREN
Santa Clara County
BRACE Grants
U.S. Dept. of Energy
CA Public Utilities
Commission
Residential Rebates
(thermostats, water heaters,
etc.)
Business Rebates
Home Energy Advisor program
Property Assessed Clean
Energy (PACE) Financing
Energy Upgrade California
2.2 A
Building/Planning
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 10,000
2.3 A
Sustainability/Building/Planning
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 305,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy
BayREN
EPA
CA Energy Commission
FutureFit Program
Single-family and multi-family
electrification programs
Solar Energy System tax credits
Low Interest Loans
2.3 B
Building
Planning/
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 305,000
BayREN Home Energy Advisor program
2.3 C
Building
Planning/
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 305,000
BayREN Home Energy Advisor program
2.3 D
Building
Planning/
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 305,000
BayREN Home Energy Advisor program
2.4 A
Building
Planning/
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 130,000
2.5 A Environmental
Commission/Planning
Commission
Building/Planning
SVCE
$ 65,000
Silicon Valley Clean
Energy
CA Energy Commission Lights On Silicon Valley
Low Interest Loans
2.5 B
Building Planning $ 65,000
3.1 A
Engineering
Building/
MTWS
$ 20,000
3.1 B
City Council
Sustainability/Engineering
$ 10,000
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
382
Agenda Item # 9.
118 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
3.1 C
City Council
Building/Engineering/MTWS
$ 63,000
3.2 A
Planning/Building
Calwater
$ 100,000 CalWater
Residential and Commercial
water efficiency rebate
programs
3.3 A
Economic
Development/Sustainability
Chamber of Commerce
$ 130,000
3.3 B
Economic
Development/Sustainability
GreenTown Los Altos
$ 130,000
4.1 A
Building/Planning
SVCE/
PG&E
$ 600,000
4.2 A
Building Planning $ 10,000
California Energy
Commission CEC grants
4.2 B
Building Planning $ 2,200,000
4.3 A
Maintenance/Finance Executive $ BAAQMD 700,000 Carl Moyer Program
4.4 A
Human Resources Executive $ 75,000
4.4 B
Human Resources Executive $ 5,000
4.5 A
Sustainability/Engineering
Finance/
MTWS
$ 5,000
4.5 B
Executive Human Resources Low
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
383
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 119
4.6 A
Executive All Dept. Low
4.6 B
Executive All Dept. Low
4.6 C
Finance Executive/All Dept. Low
5.1 A
Environmental
Commission/Planning
Commission Building/Planning $ 65,000
Water Resources Control
Board
Valley Water
Division of Financial Assistance
Landscape Rebate Program
5.1 B
Maintenance
Calwater
Medium
Natural Resources Agency
Landscape Rebate Program
5.2 A
Engineering
City of Palo Alto Public
Works $ 3,650,000
CA Natural Resources
Agency
CAL FIRE
CA ReLeaf
Urban Greening Program
Urban and Community Forestry
Grant Program
Urban forestry grants
5.2 B
Maintenance Planning/Engineering High
CA Natural Resources
Agency
CAL FIRE
CA ReLeaf
Urban Greening Program
Urban and Community Forestry
Grant Program
Urban forestry grants
5.2 C
Parks & Recreation Engineering/Maintenance $ 100,000
5.2 D
Sustainability Engineering $ 5,000
6.1 A
Maintenance Parks & Recreation
Cost for analysis likely
to be $50,000 -
$500,000.
Design/construction
order of magnitude
more.
FEMA/Cal Offices of
Emergency Services
Building Resilient Infrastructure
and Communities (BRIC)
Flood Mitigation Assistance
(FMA)
Cross-Cutting Actions
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
384
Agenda Item # 9.
120 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
6.1 B
Planning Engineering Medium
Department of Water
Resources
Wildlife Conservation
Board
Habitat Restoration Program
Urban Water Management
Grants
Stream Flow Enhancement
Program
Wildlife Corridors/Fish Passage
6.1 C
Planning
Engineering
Valley Water
$1.5 M to construct
systems to manage 5
acres of runoff/5 year
period, beyond what
is already funded
Natural Resources Agency
Wildlife Conservation
Board
Water Resources Control
Board
Urban Greening Program
Protect Fish and Wildlife from
Changing Conditions
Section 319 Nonpoint Source
Pollution Grants
6.2 A
Engineering
City Council/Planning
Commission Low Office of Planning and Rese
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants
6.2 B
Engineering Planning Low
California Transportation
Commission
Transportation Improvement
Fees (Highway Users Tax
Account (0062))
6.2 C
Planning/Building
Environmental
Commission/Planning
Commission Low
California Energy
Commission CEC grants
7.1 A
Planning Building Medium
Office of Planning and
Research
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants
7.1 B
Human Resources/Emergency
Op
Building/Planning/
BAAQMD/
Santa Clara County Public
Health Low
7.1 C
Maintenance Executive Medium
7.2 A
Maintenance
Executive/
Valley Water
Medium Public Information Officer
Santa Clara County Fire
Department
7.2 B
Emergency Op
Police/
BAAQMD
Medium
Office of Planning and
Research
Regional Climate
Collaboratives
Adaptation Actions
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
385
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 121
7.2 C
Emergency Op
Santa Clara County Public
Health Medium
8.1 A
Engineering
Emergency Op/
Finance/
Santa Clara County Public
Health Medium
Office of Planning and
Research
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants
8.2 A
Emergency Op
Sustainability/
Santa Clara County Public
Health
Medium
Office of Planning and
Research
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants
8.3 A
Emergency Op Sustainability Low
Office of Planning and
Research
Climate Adaptation &
Resilience Planning Grants
8.3 B
Environmental Commission City Council Low
IMPLEMENTATION LEADS, PARTNERS, COSTS, AND FUNDING SOURCES
APPENDIX F
ATTACHMENT 2
386
Agenda Item # 9.
122 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 Action # 2022-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035 KPI 2025 2030 2035
1.1 A
xxx
Miles of bike path built
Miles of pedestrian path built
Number of traffic calming projects completed
7 miles of bike trail built
2 miles of pedestrian path
built
5 traffic calming projects
completed
20 miles of bike trail built
5 miles of pedestrian path
built
10 traffic calming projects
completed
38 miles of bike trail built
10 miles of pedestrian path
built
22 traffic calming projects
completed
1.1 B
xx
Car-Free Zone initiative developed (Y/N)
Pedestrian areas created
Miles of downtown bike lane
Sqft new sidewalks created
New bus stops built
Initiative developed All Car-Free Zones
completed
50% of pedestrian areas,
bike lanes, sidewalks, and
bus stops completed
All pedestrian area, bike
lanes, sidewalks, and bus
stops completed
1.1 C
xxx
Number of EV-only, handicapped, and total parking
spaces
Number of drop-off/pick-up zones
PMP started PMP completed and
adopted
track
1.1 D
xx
Number of bikes, ebikes, and escooters available to
community members
Number of partnerships formed/active
bike, ebike, and escooter
pilots launched
programs scaled based on
pilot program results
track
1.2 A
xxx
Additional percent of population living in high-density areas
5% 18% 20%
1.2 B
xxx
Number and amount of incentives provided track track track
1.2 C
xxx
Community-wide VMT reduction track track 25% of employees telecommuting 1.5
days/wee
1.3 A
xx
Program developed (Y/N)
Partners identified (Y/N)
Program developed
Partners identified
Program implemented track
1.3 B
xxx
Number of transit riders
Green Transit App progress
Percent of population living within 10 min walk from transit Green Transit App Ready 100% population within 10
min walk from transit
1.3 C
xxx
Number of employees participating in TDM programs
Communitywide VMT reduction
track track 5% VMT reduction
achieved
1.3 D
xxx
Number of Car-free days/month
Percent of students taking the bus
1 car-free day/month 2 car-free days/year 2 car-free days/month 60% reduction in school
related SOV travel
1.3 E
xxx
Number of shared cars (EV and fossil fuel) available to community members
track 50% of shared vehicles EV 100% of shared vehicles EV
1.4 A
xxx
Number of EV fairs held
EVSE/EV-only parking map complete (Y/N)
Webinar series published (Y/N)
track track track
Mitigation Actions
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AND KPIs
APPENDIX G
ATTACHMENT 2
387
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 123
1.4 B
xxx
Percent of community-wide vehicles that are EV 10% higher annual EV adoption beyond ABAU
20% higher annual EV
adoption beyond ABAU
30% higher annual EV
adoption beyond ABAU
1.5 A
xxx
EVSE Master Plan developed and adopted
Number of publicly available chargers
Number of workplace chargers
EVSE Master Plan developed
and adopted
70 workplace L2 chargers
240 workplace L2 chargers 400 workplace L2 chargers
1.5 B
xxx
Number of publicly available DCFC 4 DCFC stations 12 DCFC stations 22 DCFC stations
1.5 C
xxx
Number of new permits track track track
1.5 D
xxx
Percent of residences with access to home charging 50% of residents with access to home charging
70% of residents with access
to home charging
100% of residents with
access to home charging
1.6 A
xx
Type and number of equipment replaced
Number/value of incentives provided
track track track
2.1 A
xxx
Number of audits performed
Number/value of incentives provided
track track track
2.1 B
xxx
Number of buildings retrofitted with energy-efficient
appliances and building envelope
3,325 5,985 9,310
2.2 A
xxx
Number of new buildings and remodels per year and total track track track
2.3 A
xxx
Number of residential HVAC replaced with all-electric
alternatives
3,325 5,985 9,310
2.3 B
xxx
Number of residential water heaters replaced with allelectric alternatives3,325 5,985 9,310
2.3 C
xxx
Number of commercial HVAC replaced with all-electric
alternatives
395 711 1,106
2.3 D
xxx
Number of commercial water heaters replaced with allelectric alternatives395 711 1,106 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AND KPIs
APPENDIX G
ATTACHMENT 2
388
Agenda Item # 9.
124 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022
2.4 A
xxx
Task Force formed
Program implemented
Funds raised per year and total
Task Force formed
Program implemented
track
2.5 A
xxx
Yearly and total installed capacity (kW) 120 kW new capacity 320 kW new capacity 520 kW new capacity
2.5 B
xxx
Number and capacity of new battery storage systems track track track
3.1 A
xxx
Landfill diversion rate 85% diversion 90% diversion 95% Diversion
3.1 B
x
New ordinance passed (Y/N) Ordinance passed
3.1 C
xx
Ordinance developed and adopted
Number of yearly and total buildings deconstructed
Ordinance adopted track track
3.2 A
xxx
Community-wide water use track track track
3.3 A
xxx
Farmers Markets held/year
Local businesses contacted
track track track
3.3 B
xxx
Individuals and businesses contacted
Articles published
Certified Green Businesses in the community
track track track
4.1 A
xxx
Number of audits performed
% reduction in energy use
10% reduction in municipal
energy use
20% reduction in municipal
energy use
30% reduction in municipal
energy use
4.2 A
xxx
Number of new municipal buildings track track track
4.2 B
xx
Solar capacity installed
Battery systems installed
Microgrids built
track Microgrid pilot developed
track
track
4.3 A
xx
Percent of municipal fleet that is electric 25% 100% 100%
4.4 A
xxx
Percent of staff taking alternatives to SOV commute track track track
4.4 B
xx
Percent of staff working alternative schedules or
telecommuting
track track track
4.5 A
x
Tons of waste diverted from the landfill track track track IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AND KPIs
APPENDIX G
ATTACHMENT 2
389
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 125
4.5 B
xxx
Number of remote participants at City meetings track track track
4.6 A
xxx
Up-to-date list of City projects with descriptions of
sustainable procedures, project lifespan, climate
parameters and emissions scenario considered
List completed, current, and
published annually
4.6 B
x
Number and percent of City plans and standards
incorporating climate change.
Number and percent of city departments with staff with
designated climate mitigation and/or adaptation roles.
track track track
4.6 C
xxx
Annual Goals for CAAP advancement; annual reports on
CAAP Advancement
track track track
5.1 A
xxx
Percent of Buildings with Rainwater Harvesting Systems.
Percent of Buildings with Greywater Systems.
Acres private Greenstormwater Infrastructure as reported to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution
Prevention Program (SCVURPPP)
and submitted as part of City’s annual stormwater report to the Water Board
Number of Systems at Municipal Facilities.
Percent of Municipal Facilities with Greywater.
Percent of Municipal Facilities with Rainwater Harvesting.
Number and amount of incentives/rebates provided
track track track
5.1 B
xx
Determination/Memo from RWQCP of availability
Receipt of proposal for reuse
10%
35 acres
25%
40 acres
40%
45 acres
5.2 A
xxx
Number of Existing Public and Private Trees
Number of Trees Planted
Percent Survival of Planted Trees after 2 years, 5 years, 10 years
2,000
98%
6,000
96%
10,000
95%
5.2 B
xxx
Acres of wilderness/natural areas
Acres of Impervious Park Area
Plus 0.5 Acres
Plus 2 Acres
Plus 2 Acres
Plus 5 Acres
Plus 5 Acres
Plus 15 Acres
5.2 C
xxx
Number and square footage fo carbon farming pilots track track track
5.2 D
x
Ordinance developed and adopted Ordinance adopted
6.1 A
xx
Citywide Flood Risk Study
Completed with policy and
capital project
recommendations at
conceptual design
Updated FIRM
Policies Implemented
10% of projects completed
25% of projects
in construction
25% of projects in design
40% of projects completed
30% of projects in
construction
30% of projects in design
6.1 B
x
Comprehensive Riparian
Ecosystem Restoration Plan
Developed.
Pilot projects funded.
Pilot projects constructed,
monitored, evaluated.
Projects completed
Cross-Cutting Actions
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AND KPIs
APPENDIX G
ATTACHMENT 2
390
Agenda Item # 9.
6.1 C
x
Number of green infrastructure installations
Acres of public impervious area managed by GSI
submitted as part of City’s annual stormwater report to the Water Board.
25 acres 35 acres 45 acres
6.2 A
x
Percent of projects completed, in construction, in design Heat Study conducted with policy and capital project
recommendations.
Implemented
10% of projects completed
25% of projects
in construction
25% of projects in design
40% of projects completed
30% of projects in
construction
30% of projects in design
6.2 B
x
Heat Management Plan
Developed and Piloted
6.2 C
x
Standards enacted
7.1 A
x
Number of engagements Heat Safety Protocols
Enacted. Education and
Enforcement Mechanisms
Piloted
Education and
Enforcement Mechanisms
finalized
7.1 B
x
Policy enacted, staff overtime
paid for
7.1 C
x
Number of drinking fountains/refillable water stations Existing public fountains identified, new sites identified,
25% of projects completed,
75% of remaining sites funded
7.2 A
x
Protocols and city documents
updated
7.2 B
x
Early warning system
developed and tested
7.2 C
x
Number of masks distributed
Percent of community facilities with air filtering
50% 100%
8.1 A
xx
Number of existing facilities surveyed
Number and percent of upgrades completed
Number and percent of new facilities completed
Facilities identified, immediate
actions undertaken, upgrades
and/or new facilities identified
and costed, 75% funded, 25%
constructed, 25% in
construction, 50% in design
100% of upgrades and/or
new facilities funded, 75%
constructed, 25% in
construction
100% of upgrades and/or
new facilities constructed
8.2 A
xx
Number of people engaged
Number of caregivers engaged
Vulnerable Populations
identified. Education and
resource program
established.
8.3 A
x
CERT materials updated All new volunteers trained
using updated CERT
All new volunteers trained
using updated CERT
All new volunteers trained
using updated CERT
Adaptation Actions
8.3 B
x
Grant criteria established
Number of grants awarded
Micro-grant program
established, 5 grants awarded
30 grants awarded 75 grants awarded
126 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE AND KPIs
APPENDIX G
ATTACHMENT 2
391
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H:
CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
AFOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA ppendix E: Climate Vulnerability Assessment for the City of Los
Altos, CA
Prepared by EcoShift Consulting
Executive Summary
The City of Los Altos (Los Altos) is located on the eastern edge of the Santa Cruz mountains, roughly 15 miles East of the Pacific Ocean and 5 miles from the San Francisco Bay. Proximity to these large water bodies has made for a stable climate and will somewhat temper future climate hazards compared to other areas in California.
This Vulnerability Assessment is intended to assist Los Altos in understanding the climate risks it faces under future emissions scenarios. In keeping with California Senate Bill 379, the assessment relies on resources provided by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) including Cal-Adapt and the California Adaptation Planning Guide to describe how the frequencyand intensityof climate hazards are changing. The Vulnerability Assessment is just the first step in Los Altos’ effort in planning for and adapting to climate change, outlined in Los Altos’ Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (CAAP). The Vulnerability Assessment is an appendix to the CAAP. The documents should be read together.
Purpose of SB 379
Senate Bill No. 379 of the California Legislature requires local jurisdictions to address climate adaptation and resiliency strategies in either the local hazard mitigation plan or an update to the safety element of a jurisdiction’s General Plan, depending on the date of adoption of a local hazard mitigation plan. The update includes a climate vulnerability assessment “identifying the risks that climate change poses...and the geographic areas at risk,” along with a set of goals and strategies to address those risks.
The Cal-Adapt tool and projections of climate change taken from other government plans describe how climate is changing, but they do not describe what the impact will be on Los Altos. The goal of the Vulnerability Assessment is to understand how and how much a changing climate will impact the community sectors - assets, people, economy - that make Los Altos what it is. Adaptation strategies developed in response to the Vulnerability Assessment are described in the CAAP.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 127 ATTACHMENT 2
392
Agenda Item # 9.
Introduction
Natural variability in the climate and weather produce extreme events like droughts, wildfires, and floods over long time periods. While natural systems respond to and even rely on these phenomena, our dense settlement and production of greenhouse gas emissions have greatly changed the impacts of climate hazards.
Increased capture of solar radiation, generally referred to as global warming or climate change, is having massive and long-term effects on climatic conditions and global systems like the water cycle, jet stream and ocean currents that transfer energy. Generally, the oceans are rising and temperatures are increasing. Disruptions in jet stream patterns have caused highly unseasonal weather. Some naturally occurring hazards are expected to occur more frequently and with greater intensity, putting our infrastructure, environment, housing, and populations at greater risk.
Indicators of Climate Change in California, a report prepared by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, describes the rapidity with which climate change has impacted the state. Included are the following statements.1 ● Average maximum temperatures have increased by 2.2°Farenheit over the past century
● The 2012 to 2016 drought was the most extreme since instrumental records began, producing a moisture deficit not seen in the last 1,200 years. It is consistent with a trend of California becoming increasingly dry.
● Glaciers in the Sierra Nevada have decreased in area dramatically, with several of the largest glaciers decreasing by half.
● The amount of water stored in the state’s snowpack has been highly variable from year to year, dropping to a record low 5% of the historical average in 2015. Snowmelt runoff during April through July has declined.
● The area burned by wildfires across the state is increasing. ● Over the past 80 years, California’s forests have been changing in response to decreasing water availability, driven by warmer temperatures. Small trees and oaks have increased, while pines have decreased.
While efforts at the State and County levels have addressed climate risks and methods to mitigate them, this document is the first to consider the climate risk to Los Altos on the local level, in accordance with SB 379. Although future climate conditions are not certain, models developed by the scientific community and recommended by the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (OES) provide a range of possible changes to the climate and serve as the technical basis for understanding Los Altos’ climate risk.
1 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency (2018).
Indicators of Climate Change in California. Sacramento, California.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
128 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
393
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Background
California has been divided into 16 different climate zones based on shared characteristics to understand the energy needs for heating and cooling throughout the year. Los Altos is in California Climate Zone 4, which uses San Jose as a reference city. The climate in Zone 4, of which Los Altos is at the very northern boundary, is inland enough to have hot summers but is influenced by the ocean which moderates high and low temperature extremes. Much of the year falls within the comfort zone of 68-80F. Typically, winters are cool and wet. However, Los Altos is in a “rain shadow” of the Santa Cruz mountains, limiting winter precipitation, as well as wind and fog as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Relationship Between Topography and Precipitation in Simplified Cross Section of California showing how Los Altos is in a rain shadow of the Santa Cruz Mountains (Modified from: C. Ahrens, Essentials of Meteorology, 2nd Edition) Climate Hazard History in Los Altos
Los Altos has experienced many climate hazards since its incorporation almost 75 years ago and more in recorded history. The frequency of these hazards provides a baseline for considering future hazards, even if Los Altos continues to change and the rate of climate change is increasing. Greenhouse gas emissions will change the frequency and intensity of experienced climate hazards but will not introduce new hazards altogether. Many of these experienced hazards are enumerated in Table 1 of Federally declared disasters. Table 1 indicates the relative prevalence of climate LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 129 ATTACHMENT 2
394
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
hazards that reach the level of Federal disaster declaration. Severe winter storms that caused flooding were the most frequent climate event followed by wildfires.
Since the Federal government declares disasters at a county-wide scale, the severity of damage to Los Altos specifically is difficult to ascertain from this data set alone.
Incident Type Declaration Title Date FEMA Declaration
Biological
COVID-19 March 13, 2020 EM-3428-CA
COVID-19 PANDEMIC March 22, 2020 DR-4482-CA
Coastal Storm COASTAL STORMS, FLOODS,
SLIDES & TORNADOES February 9, 1983 DR-677-CA
Drought DROUGHT January 20, 1977 EM-3023-CA
Earthquake LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE October 18, 1989 DR-845-CA Fire
GRASS, WILDLANDS, &
FOREST FIRES July 18, 1985 DR-739-CA
CROY FIRE September 25, 2002 FM-2465-CA
SUMMIT FIRE May 22, 2008 FM-2766-CA
WILDFIRES June 28, 2008 EM-3287-CA
SCU LIGHTNING COMPLEX
FIRE August 21, 2020 FM-5338-CA
WILDFIRES August 22, 2020 DR-4558-CA
Flood
SEVERE STORMS, FLOOD,
MUDSLIDES & HIGH TIDE January 7, 1982 DR-651-CA
SEVERE STORMS &
FLOODING February 21, 1986 DR-758-CA
SEVERE WINTER STORMS,
FLOODING, AND
MUDSLIDES April 1, 2017 DR-4308-CA
Freezing SEVERE FREEZE February 11, 1991 DR-894-CA
Hurricane HURRICANE KATRINA
EVACUATION September 13, 2005 EM-3248-CA
Severe Storm(s)
SEVERE WINTER STORMS,
FLOODING, LANDSLIDES,
MUD FLOWS January 10, 1995 DR-1044-CA
SEVERE WINTER STORMS,
FLOODING LANDSLIDES,
MUD FLOW March 12, 1995 DR-1046-CA
SEVERE STORMS,
FLOODING, MUD AND
LANDSLIDES January 4, 1997 DR-1155-CA
SEVERE WINTER STORMS
AND FLOODING February 9, 1998 DR-1203-CA
SEVERE WINTER STORMS,
FLOODING, AND
MUDSLIDES February 14, 2017 DR-4301-CA
130 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
395
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Table 1: Relative prevalence of climate hazards that reach the level of Federal disaster declaration
FEMA declares disasters on a county level, even if the disaster only affected part of the county. Pandemics and earthquakes, though shown in Table 1, are not climate hazards so are not discussed in this report. Notably absent from the table are several multi-year droughts, based on how FEMA calculates event losses. The only FEMA-declared emergency classified as a drought - in all of California’s history - occurred in 1977. However, Santa Clara County has experienced three additional extended year droughts: 1987-1992, 2007-2009, 2012-2017. As of this writing (summer 2021), California is experiencing persistent severe drought.
Based on this history and Cal-Adapts projections, this vulnerability assessment has been framed around three climate-related groups of hazards:
1. Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
2. Precipitation & Flooding
3. Wildfires & Air pollution
Reports produced by other jurisdictions may include different climate variables and climate hazards, or categorize the variables and hazards differently based on their climate conditions.
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
Average temperatures and the number of extreme heat days are projected to increase throughout the century, according to Cal-Adapt. The number of extreme heat days are projected to be almost 300% more in a high emissions scenario than in a medium emissions scenario.
Whether or not droughts get worse depends on the definition of drought. One definition is a prolonged period with below-average or no precipitation. The length of dry spells is expected to increase as much as 15%, while average annual precipitation is not expected to change. Higher temperatures combined with less consistent rain will impact both water supply and outdoor water demand.
Climate Hazards like droughts, heat waves, and air pollution are stressors that are usually less dynamic than floods or wildfires. Droughts occur on a slower timeline and can last longer than other climate hazards. Droughts may not cause a loss of property or impair infrastructure like other hazards, but prolonged droughts impact the environment, the economy, and residents’ quality of life. The Santa Clara County Operational Area (OA) Hazard Mitigation Plan declares:
Historical drought data regarding Santa Clara County OA indicate four significant droughts over the last 40 years, with drought occurring in 12 of those 40 years. Based on risk factors and this history, droughts likely will continue to occur in the Santa Clara County OA. Moreover, as temperatures increase, probability of future droughts will LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 131 ATTACHMENT 2
396
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
likely increase as well. Therefore, droughts likely will occur in Santa Clara County at varied severities in the future, even after conclusion of the current [2012-2017]drought.2 Similarly, across Santa Clara County, several extreme heat events were experienced in the past 20 years, including during 2000, 2006, and 2009. None of these were Federally-declared disasters. Yet heat waves have become stronger across the region, including mid-summer night-time heat waves and increases in day-time heat waves. Though heat waves are invisible, they can have great impacts on human health, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Precipitation & Flooding
Los Altos has experienced numerous severe winter storms that have caused flooding, and multiple climate models predict at least one severe storm a year under high emissions scenarios by the end of the century (See the section Future Changes to Climate Hazards, below). Interestingly, while severe storms will happen more frequently, they will not be much more intense according to projections produced by Cal-Adapt. Similarly, the average annual precipitation is not expected to change.
Floods are caused by the duration, intensity, and spatial distribution of precipitation interacting with terrain and land use characteristics like ground cover. In other words, floods are not exclusively a climate hazard. They are the result of a climate phenomenon in interaction with physical conditions. These local conditions that influence flooding range from short-term characteristics such as soil moisture to long-standing features like the size of storm sewers. Similarly, the impact of floods depend on what is flooded: The storms of 1998 caused overtopping of Adobe Creek, flooding properties and damaging structures in Los Altos Redwood Grove Nature Preserve, but producing much less damage than if somehow downtown were flooded.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
Despite increased temperatures, wildfires are not projected to be a significantly worse threat in the future for Los Altos, based on the average area burned by wildfires. That indicator of wildfires is projected to decrease as Los Altos urbanizes.
Regionally, Los Altos and the surrounding area is not high risk, though the relative risk for natural areas in the Santa Cruz mountains is projected to increase slightly.
CAL FIRE’s somewhat outdated maps do not consider Los Altos or most of the areas around Los Altos to be very high fire hazard severity zones because they are urban.
The closest very high fire hazard areas are in southern Cupertino and Saratoga.
Some areas west of Los Altos are in a high hazard severity zone.
However, the analysis is limited to direct wildfire impact in Los Altos – acres burned.
Secondary impacts like air pollution can be significant and prolonged. 2 Santa Clara County Operational Area Mitigation Plan, Office of Emergency Services, p. 117, http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?event_id=2690&meta_id=642821, accessed June 8, 2021 132 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
397
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
In some ways, wildfires are an interesting analog to floods, influenced both by weather and local conditions. The Santa Clara County Climate Adaptation Guidebook describes this complexity. “Weather is one of the most significant factors in determining the severity of wildfires; [however,] natural fire patterns are driven [both] by conditions such as drought, temperature, precipitation, and wind, and also by changes to vegetation structure and fuel (i.e.) biomass availability.” Just as floods are exacerbated by high soil moisture, wildfires are more destructive when they occur on top of strong droughts.
Of course, wildfires can start from any number of human sources and not only during dry weather. Like floods, wildfires present the greatest risk to life and property when they cross the wildland urban interface into developed areas. However, the spread and duration of wildfires is less predictable than floods. Wildfires are most likely to spread through embers directed by wind and the air currents of the fire itself.
These air currents can bring particulate matter hundreds of miles from the fire.
During the SCU Fire and even the Paradise Fire, Los Altos was impacted by poor air quality which kept people in their homes.3 Summer can already produce poor air quality due to photochemical (sunlight) smog and the long-term suspension of particulate matter that rain in the winter and spring dissolves. These periods of air pollution increase the health risk for people with pre-existing respiratory conditions and/or who experience occupational hazards through outdoor work. 3 As shared in the Apr. 23, 2021 focus group
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 133 ATTACHMENT 2
398
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Figure 2: Average concentration of particulate matter 2.5 in Los Altos and surrounding area Although a verdant city, Los Altos has only average air quality. The Bay Area as well as the Central Valley south of Sacramento are all non-attainment areas for ambient air quality standards. Figure 2 shows the concentration of Particulate Matter 2.5, a specifically harmful irritant. According to OEHHA, “PM2.5…can have adverse effects on the heart and lungs, including lung irritation, exacerbation of existing respiratory disease, and cardiovascular effects. The US EPA has set a new [in the last decade] standard for ambient PM2.5 concentration of 12 μg/m3, down from 15 μg/m3.” Most of Los Altos is higher than 10 μg/m3. The EPA classifies the whole of Santa Clara County as “moderate” in the category of PM 2.5. It should be noted that ozone, another indicator of air quality, has improved considerably throughout the Bay Area since the 1960s. Given the moderate baseline air quality, added pollution from wildfires even far from Los Altos can create unhealthy levels of PM2.5 134 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
399
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Future Changes to Climate Hazards
There are several sources of information about future climate hazards and their impact on Los Altos. Described below is information from several State, County, and local documents and tools. These sources are not exhaustive, nor are they entirely in agreement, however, together they provide a helpful composite.
California State Hazard Mitigation Plan
The California State Hazard Mitigation Plan is the state’s primary document which describes historical and current hazards and articulates goals to mitigate those hazards to reduce injury, death, and damage. The Hazard Mitigation Plan is helpful background for the Vulnerability Assessment, although hazard mitigation is not exactly the same as climate adaptation. Specifically, the goal of hazard mitigation planning is to understand the probability and impact of natural and man-made hazards and to outline actions to reduce or eliminate the loss of life and property from those hazards. Some of the hazards in the hazard mitigation plan are natural hazards and most of those natural hazards are climate related. The plan lists fire, flood, and earthquake as the primary hazards based on number of events, deaths, and cost. Climate change, it says, will result in “more frequent incidence of severe events, such as extreme rainfall, wind, wildfire, extreme heat, and extended drought.”4
California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment – San Francisco Bay Area Region Report
California’s fourth climate change assessment was produced in 2018. Given the size and physical diversity of California, the assessment was divided into region-specific reports. The San Francisco Bay Area Region report describes that temperatures in the Bay Area rose almost 2°F between 1950 and 2005 and are expected to rise significantly by mid-century. If emissions continue through the end of the century, temperature changes will be major, with an increase of 7.2°F. However, inland areas will heat up more than coastal areas, both generally and when comparing the hottest day of the year in each area.
According to the report, precipitation will continue to vary significantly year to year, based on the occurrence and path of winter jet stream flows which produce “atmospheric rivers.” Winter storms from the atmospheric rivers will continue to produce significant snowfall in the Sierra Nevada and heavy rainfall capable of causing floods. Under a high emissions scenario, the wettest day of the year in 2100 may produce 30% more rain. The Bay Area may experience precipitation “whiplash” year to year:
4 California State Hazard Mitigation Plan, California Office of Emergency Services, 2018, Section 4.3 – p. 129 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 135 ATTACHMENT 2
400
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Even if total precipitation increases, changes in the timing and form of precipitation (rain or snow) along with expected increases in temperature are likely to cause longer and deeper droughts. Average Sierra snowpack is expected to decline between 30% and 60% by mid-century and over 80% by the end of the century under a high emissions scenario.
Future fire activity is expected to increase as climate warms; however, the distribution of risk is uncertain because it depends on changes in urban development. Where the wildland-urban interface expands, fire risks will increase.
Rural and suburban areas that urbanize will see a decline in fire risk.
Santa Clara County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan The Santa Clara County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan is the county-wide hazard mitigation plan for Santa Clara County. The plan describes briefly how climate will impact the frequency and severity of climate hazards. Specifically, it describes that the number and length of heat waves is expected to increase, as are the number of single-day extreme heat days. According to the document, “precipitation projections for California remain uncertain,” however, the combination of temperature increases combined with the timing and form of precipitation is expected to change stream flow and river flooding. Wildfire risk as defined by area burned in Santa Clara County is not expected to change significantly by mid-century.
The average area burned is expected to decrease by 10-20% by 2085.
Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex
The Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex is a Los Altos-specific addition to the Santa Clara County Hazard Mitigation Plan. The Los Altos Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex not only lists the history of declared disasters, it also ranks natural hazards based on their probability and their impact. According to the Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex, the hazard with the highest risk score (probability x impact) is earthquake (48) followed by severe weather (33), flood (18), drought (9), dam and levee failure (6), wildfire (3) and landslide (3). Severe weather includes severe storms from atmospheric rivers or thunderstorms, extreme heat and frosts/freezes, high winds, and so-called space weather, which refers to disruptive variations in the sun’s energy.
The risk score ranking is useful for understanding how the hazards compare to one another. While earthquakes are a natural hazard, it is not considered in this climate Vulnerability Assessment.5
5 With the exception of sea level rise increasing the liquefaction risk in coastal areas outside of Los Altos, there is no relation between atmospheric phenomena and earthquake risk. More simply, whether we reverse or continue climate change will not increase or decrease the risks of earthquakes. Earthquakes are well considered in the Hazard Mitigation Plan for Santa Clara County and its Los Altos Annex. 136 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
401
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Rankings of the CAAP Task Force
The CAAP Task Force is a group of City staff and Environmental Commission members who guided the development of the CAAP. They are involved in many aspects of Los Altos operations, planning, and environmental management and so were asked what climate hazards they were most concerned about in the future.
They ranked their concern (high, medium, low) for primary and secondary climate hazards. Primary climate hazards are phenomena that are climate variables.
Temperature and precipitation define climate. Secondary climate hazards are hazards resulting from changes in primary climate hazards in relation to community sectors like the natural environment, the economy, and the public. All twelve respondents on that Task Force completed the survey ranking hazards of concern.
Responses are shown below
Primary Climate
Hazards Score
Temperature Increase 2.4
Precipitation Changes 1.8
Sea Level Rise 1.3
Table 3: Average Scores and Ranking for Primary Climate Hazards according to the CAAP Task Force
Secondary Climate
Hazards Score
Drought 2.8
Extreme Heat/Heat Waves 2.4
Wildfire 2.4
Air Pollution 2.4
Flooding (Riverine, Areal) 2.3
Urban Heat Island 1.9
Flooding (Coastal) 1.4
Landslide 1.3
Table 4: Average Scores and Ranking for Secondary Climate Hazards according to the CAAP Task Force
The CAAP Task Force was most concerned about increasing temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns. Each of the hazards of high and medium concern were related to the impacts of heat, with drought receiving the highest average score and extreme heat, wildfire, and air pollution receiving the next highest scores.
The hazard with the highest score, drought, is driven both by heat and by precipitation. Air pollution, wildfires, and urban heat island are hazards that are not entirely a natural phenomenon.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 137 ATTACHMENT 2
402
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Cal-Adapt & Adaptation Planning in California
The OES issued the California Adaptation Planning Guide (APG) to help municipalities and all stakeholders involved in the vulnerability assessment process with recommendations and tools to develop a scientifically grounded, relevant, and actionable adaptation plan.
One of the public resources provided by OES to be used in consult with the (APG) is a web-based climate projection tool called Cal-Adapt. Cal-Adapt provides historical and projected climate information, including “local snapshots” of several different climate phenomena under different emissions scenarios through 2100. The global climate models selected by OES are particularly well matched to California’s climate.
Cal-Adapt was used for this vulnerability assessment to predict what future temperature and precipitation Los Altos will experience based on scenarios of future global emissions or Representative Concentration Pathways, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5, adopted by the International Panel on Climate Change. These emissions scenarios are based on models of population growth, economic growth, food production, technological advancement, political activities to curb greenhouse gas emissions and other factors. RCP 2.6 represents a “very stringent” pathway, in which emissions start declining by 2020 and go to zero by 2100. It is not included in Cal-Adapt. RCP
4.5 represents a global growth scenario in which emissions continue to 2040 and then decline. RCP 8.5 represents a “business as usual” scenario in which emissions continue unabated. Because these scenarios and models are global, they do not consider how Los Altos reduces its emissions.
Cal-Adapt plugs these global emissions scenarios into global climate models (GCMs) to produce local information about areas in California, including Los Altos.
Cal-Adapt describes the process on its Guidance on Using Climate Projections webpage, from which the text below is reproduced.
Climate scientists create projections of future climate using powerful tools called global climate models. Global climate models are complex pieces of computer software that crunch through thousands of mathematical equations representing the scientific theory of how the climate system works. They can be used to simulate climate over past periods, or to run experiments in which scientists impose certain conditions on the model to see how the climate system responds. A future climate projection is the product of global climate model experiments in which scientists impose upon the model some scenario of the future atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases [eg. RCP
4.5 and RCP 8.5].
When climate scientists run a climate model, they divide the area of study into a grid, and the model performs calculations for each 138 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
403
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
individual cell within the grid. The output from those calculations can then be visualized on a map, similar to the visualizations in Cal-Adapt [shown in Figures 3-9]. In climate model projections, for any given snapshot in time, each grid cell is represented by a single value for temperature, precipitation, or other climate variable of interest.
The grid cells in most global climate models are very large—from 100 to 600 kilometers [roughly 100 to 375 miles] squared. This coarse resolution is OK when scientists are studying climate on the global scale, but it is not very useful when we are trying to understand climate change on smaller scales. We know that present-day climate varies greatly from region to region in California, and so we expect future climate to vary accordingly. But that detail is lost in the global climate models, in which all of California may be represented by just a few grid cells. To be able to plan for the future, we need to produce higher-resolution projections of future climate. Climate scientists do just that by using various techniques to "downscale" global climate model output to finer spatial scales. The data in Cal-Adapt is taken from a selection of global climate models and downscaled to about 7-kilometer [roughly 4.5 mile] resolution.
Understanding Cal-Adapt Graphs
The Cal-Adapt graphs presented in this Vulnerability Assessment display several types of data illustrating how variables like temperature, extreme heat, drought, precipitation, and wildfire are expected to change as climate change continues. The next series of images describes how information on the Los Altos graphs are displayed.
The line in grey represents historical observed
values for each year shown on the graph. The
year-to-year differences represent the natural
variation in climate. Although the planet is
warming over the long term, some years are still
cooler or warmer than others.
The colored areas of the graph below represent projections under different emissions scenarios, RCP 4.5 representing continued global emissions until 2040 and RCP 8.5 representing continued global emissions through the end of the century.
RCP 4.5 is shown in a light blue
or teal color. The blue line
represents the most likely
individual cell within the grid. The output from those calculations can then be visualized on a map, similar to the visualizations in Cal-Adapt [shown in Figures 3-9]. In climate model projections, for any given snapshot in time, each grid cell is represented by a single value for temperature, precipitation, or other climate variable of interest.
The grid cells in most global climate models are very large—from 100 to 600 kilometers [roughly 100 to 375 miles] squared. This coarse resolution is OK when scientists are studying climate on the global scale, but it is not very useful when we are trying to understand climate change on smaller scales. We know that present-day climate varies greatly from region to region in California, and so we expect future climate to vary accordingly. But that detail is lost in the global climate models, in which all of California may be represented by just a few grid cells. To be able to plan for the future, we need to produce higher-resolution projections of future climate. Climate scientists do just that by using various techniques to "downscale" global climate model output to finer spatial scales. The data in Cal-Adapt is taken from a selection of global climate models and downscaled to about 7-kilometer [roughly 4.5 mile] resolution.
Understanding Cal-Adapt Graphs
The Cal-Adapt graphs presented in this Vulnerability Assessment display several types of data illustrating how variables like temperature, extreme heat, drought, precipitation, and wildfire are expected to change as climate change continues. The next series of images describes how information on the Los Altos graphs are displayed.
The line in grey represents historical observed
values for each year shown on the graph. The
year-to-year differences represent the natural
variation in climate. Although the planet is
warming over the long term, some years are still
cooler or warmer than others.
The colored areas of the graph below represent projections under different emissions scenarios, RCP 4.5 representing continued global emissions until 2040 and RCP 8.5 representing continued global emissions through the end of the century.
RCP 4.5 is shown in a light blue
or teal color. The blue line
represents the most likely
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 139 ATTACHMENT 2
404
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
outcome for whatever variable is being graphed. Because it is produced by averaging multiple climate models, it smooths out the year-to-year variability that each model predicts. The line does not indicate that year-to-year variability will disappear. (Figure 6 in the following pages shows how much variability is predicted year-to-year in individual models)
The shaded blue or teal area around the line represents the full range of climate projections for the variable across all the models. If one model predicts a high value and one model predicts a low value, that information is shown in the shaded area.
In sum, under a medium emissions scenario, Los Altos may experience any value within the shaded blue area and is most likely to experience the value on the blue line.
The same explanation for the image holds true under a high emissions scenario, shown in light purple. The purple line represents the most likely outcome for the variable, and the shaded area around the line represents the full range of climate projections for the variable across all models.
When both emissions scenarios are
graphed, the darker purple-grey
area represents the possible values
which are projected in both medium
emissions and high emissions
scenarios. For some climate
variables, like temperature,
differences between emissions
scenarios become clear later in the
century by less and less overlap in
blue and purple shaded areas,
indicating that reducing emissions
will reduce how much temperatures
rise. For other variables, like
precipitation, there is not a significant visual difference between the blue and purple shaded areas, indicating that the range of values for precipitation is more or less the same in either emissions scenario.
140 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
405
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Precipitation & Flooding
Figure 3 shows the observed and projected annual precipitation for Los Altos. The graph indicates that there is expected to be little change in annual average precipitation in a medium or high emissions scenario for both Los Altos and Santa Clara County (not shown), a remarkable reality considering that many areas across California and the country are projected to experience much greater drought in the future. As shown in Table 5, average annual precipitation is projected to increase marginally.
Figure 3: Annual total precipitation, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios. The shaded area represents the range of likely annual precipitation totals in each scenario; the colored lines represent the most likely precipitation total in each scenario. Produced using Cal-Adapt.
Period Years
Emissions
Scenario Average
Range of
Averages Units
Baseline 1961-1990 Observed 19 inches
Mid-Century 2035-2064
Medium (RCP
4.5) 20.1 17.5 - 26.4 inches
End-Century 2070-2099
Medium (RCP
4.5) 20.6 16.7 - 25.2 inches
Mid-Century 2035-2064
High (RCP
8.5) 20.5 16.4 - 26.1 inches
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 141 ATTACHMENT 2
406
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
End-Century 2070-2099
High (RCP
8.5) 21.3 14.7 - 28.6 inches
Table 5: Annual total precipitation, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods according to Cal-Adapt. The numbers in the average column represent the averages of the most likely outcome over the 30-year periods. The numbers in the range of averages column represents the averages from all climate models over the 30-year periods. The range of averages is generally greater in the high emissions scenario, indicating the greater uncertainty under high emissions.
Even if annual precipitation is expected to remain consistent as an annual average, the timing of rainfall is expected to vary from the existing seasons. Winters may be wetter and spring and autumn may be drier. The variability may include more intense, infrequent rainfall causing riverine flooding, preceded and followed by longer dry spells without any precipitation. The maximum 1-day precipitation event is expected to increase marginally.
Flooding is likely to increase as a result of an increased number of days with extreme rainfall events. That increased risk may be compounded with a slight increase in the number of wildfires in areas uphill and upstream from Los Altos that reduce the ability of plants and soils to absorb rainfall. Conversely, back-to-back extreme rainfall events in late winter may fall on areas already saturated and unable to absorb rainfall. The result in either case is a change in the intensity and pattern of flooding. Determining flood risk requires hydrologic and hydraulic analyses that are outside the scope of this assessment- the last study performed for FEMA was in 1977, indicating that a new analysis should be performed. 142 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
407
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Figure 4: Maximum 1-day precipitation, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios. The shaded area represents the range of likely precipitation totals in each scenario; the colored lines represent the most likely total in each scenario. Produced using Cal-Adapt.
Period Years Emissions
Scenario Average Range ofAverages Units
Baseline 1961-1990 Observed 1.5 inches
Mid-Century 2035-2064 Medium (RCP
4.5) 1.6 1.35 - 2.06 inches
End-Century 2070-2099 Medium (RCP
4.5) 1.6 1.36 - 2.01 inches
Mid-Century 2035-2064 High (RCP
8.5) 1.6 1.35 - 1.86 inches
End-Century 2070-2099 High (RCP
8.5) 1.7 1.36 - 2.29 inches
Table 6: Maximum 1-day precipitation, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods according to Cal-Adapt. The numbers in the average column represent the averages of the most likely outcome over the 30-year periods. The numbers in the range of averages column represents the averages from all climate models over the 30-year periods.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 143 ATTACHMENT 2
408
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Figure 5 shows a slightly different representation of future precipitation under a high emissions scenario and, using four models recommended by Cal-Adapt, shows an increase in the number of extreme precipitation events annually. Through mid-century, all of the models predict some years with no extreme precipitation events annually. By the end of the century, three of the four models predict several extreme events annually – it will be more likely than not to experience at least one extreme event annually. Since the annual precipitation is not expected to increase, it can be assumed that there will be a decrease in the amount of precipitation occurring during non-extreme precipitation events.
Figure 5: Number of extreme precipitation events projected under high emissions scenarios according to 5 different global climate models (GCMs) recommended by Cal-Adapt.
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
As shown in Figure 6, the annual average maximum temperature is expected to increase over the rest of the 21st century. Under the high emissions scenario (RCP 8.5), temperature is projected to increase nearly 8 degrees F, nearly twice as much as under a medium emissions scenario (RCP 4.5). Table 7 indicates the certainty of temperature increases. Even the low end of the range of averages is higher than the observed average, 1961-1990.
144 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
409
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Figure 6: Annual average maximum temperatures, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios. The shaded area represents the range of likely temperatures in each scenario; the colored lines represent the most likely temperature in each scenario.
Produced using Cal-Adapt.
Period Years Emissions
Scenario Average Range ofAverages Units
Baseline 1961-1990 Observed 67.7 °F
Mid-Century 2035-2064 Medium (RCP
4.5) 70.3 68.8 - 71.8 °F
End-Century 2070-2099 Medium (RCP
4.5) 71.4 69.5 - 73.7 °F
Mid-Century 2035-2064 High (RCP
8.5) 71.1 69.2 - 72.9 °F
End-Century 2070-2099 High (RCP
8.5) 74.3 71.5 - 78.1 °F
Table 7: Annual Average Maximum Temperature, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods according to Cal-Adapt. The numbers in the average column represent the averages of the most likely outcome over the 30-year periods. The numbers in the range of averages column represents the averages from all climate models over the 30-year periods.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 145 ATTACHMENT 2
410
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Drought
As a product of increasing temperatures and increasing precipitation variability, including less spring and autumn precipitation, drought may increase. The maximum length of dry spell is expected to increase by 10-15% as shown in the table below.
Figure 7: Maximum length of dry spell, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios. The shaded area represents the range of likely number of days of dry spell totals in each scenario; the colored lines represent the most likely maximum length in each scenario. Produced using Cal-Adapt.
Period Years Emissions
Scenario Average Range of
Averages Units
Baseline 1961-1990 Observed 120 days
Mid-Century 2035-2064 Medium (RCP
4.5) 133 119 - 151 days
End-Century 2070-2099 Medium (RCP
4.5) 135 115 - 150 days
Mid-Century 2035-2064 High (RCP
8.5) 137 125 - 151 days
End-Century 2070-2099 High (RCP
8.5) 140 112 - 172 days
146 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
411
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Table 8: Maximum length of dry spell, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods according to Cal-Adapt. The numbers in the average column represent the averages of the most likely outcome over the 30-year periods. The numbers in the range of averages column represents the averages from all climate models over the 30-year periods. Under a high emissions scenario, the range of averages at the end of century (112-172 days) is significantly wider than the range of averages mid-century (125-151 days), indicating the uncertainty of the impact of high emissions longer term.
Average temperatures and days with extreme heat are expected to increase, increasing evaporation and evapotranspiration (release of water vapor by plants) in turn. Residential water use for landscaping may increase in response. Defining drought as simply the length of a dry spell obscures the complexity of Los Altos’ water supply and use. Future droughts will be defined not just by precipitation and temperature, but by water supply storage levels across the water system and water use by end users. In other words, drought is not an entirely natural phenomenon.
Extreme Heat/Heat Waves
Heat waves are expected to increase in severity, frequency, and duration.
Figure 8: Number of extreme heat days, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios. The shaded area represents the range of likely number of extreme heat days in each scenario; the colored lines represent the most likely number of extreme heat days in each scenario. Produced using Cal-Adapt.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 147 ATTACHMENT 2
412
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Period Years Emissions
Scenario Average Range ofAverages Units
Baseline 1961-1990 Observed 4 days
Mid-Century 2035-2064 Medium (RCP
4.5) 11 7-17 days
End-Century 2070-2099 Medium (RCP
4.5) 13 9-23 days
Mid-Century 2035-2064 High (RCP
8.5) 14 8-20 days
End-Century 2070-2099 High (RCP
8.5) 24 13-49 days
Table 9: Number of extreme heat days, observed and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods according to Cal-Adapt. The numbers in the average column represent the averages of the most likely outcome over the 30-year periods. The numbers in the range of averages column represents the averages from all climate models over the 30-year periods.
As shown in Figure 8, the number of extreme heat days (defined as days with high temperatures above 90.2F for Los Altos) is expected to increase above 10 by mid-century. By the end of the century, Cal Adapt projects more than three times as many days of extreme heat under the medium emissions scenario and as many as 40 days of extreme heat under the high emissions scenario.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
Remarkably, given the expected increases in average and extreme temperatures, the area of Los Altos burned by wildfires is projected to decrease, according to Cal Adapt, under both medium and high emissions scenarios.
148 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
413
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
End-Century 2070-2099 High (RCP
8.5) 19 14.9 - 22.7 acres
Table 10: Number of average acres burned, modeled and projected under medium and high emissions scenarios over 30-year periods. The average number of acres burned is expected to decrease under both medium emissions and high emissions scenarios.
Additional Sources for Wildfire
Since the Cal-Adapt projections and the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex indicated that wildfire was low risk and yet wildfire was a relatively high concern of the CAAP Task Force, additional research was conducted on the future risk of wildfires. Sources identified were the Santa Clara County Climate Adaptation Guidebook, Caltrans Vulnerability Assessment for District 4 (San Francisco Bay Area), and CAL FIRE.
According to the Santa Clara County Climate Adaptation Guidebook, climate change is projected to increase the frequency of wildfires, the extent of burned areas, and the duration of wildfire seasons. “Wildfire seasons are projected to begin earlier in the spring due to drier and warmer spring conditions on average.” However, this increase in wildfire seems to be minor in the areas surrounding Los Altos and other already urbanized areas, as shown in the CALFIRE maps of Santa Clara County.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 149 ATTACHMENT 2
414
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Figure 10: Maps of Santa Clara County indicating current (above) and future (below) wildfire risk level, according to CAL FIRE.
150 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
415
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
In Figure 10, some mountainous areas west of Los Altos move from “moderate” to “high” risk and a large area southwest of Los Altos moves from “high” to “very high” risk.
The section of Caltrans’
Vulnerability Assessment
focusing on wildfire risk
shows the likelihood of
wildfire in 2085 increasing in
some areas of Santa Clara
County, but not
Los Altos or the entire San
Francisco Peninsula.
Figure 11: Caltrans’ Vulnerability
Assessment focusing on wildfire risk showing the likelihood of wildfire in 2085.
Air Pollution/Air Quality
The minor increase in risk of wildfire in areas surrounding Los Altos may relatively worsen air quality in Los Altos, however, climate projections focus on the relative risk of areas to wildfire, not to air quality impacts based on prevailing wind patterns. Air quality was not a climate variable for which Cal-Adapt produced projections. The California State Hazard Mitigation Plan describes how air pollution could deteriorate in the future
Climate change has the potential to worsen PM concentrations in California due to increased incidence of wildfire as well as the increased temperature and reduced precipitation in many locations. Smoke and ash produced by fire increase PM concentrations. Similarly, dry, warm weather can result in greater amounts of dust being blown and suspended in air. 6
In summary, even if Los Altos isn’t as vulnerable to direct impacts from wildfires, it should be prepared for the indirect impact of air pollution.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 151 ATTACHMENT 2
416
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED concentrations. Similarly, dry, warm weather can result in greater amounts of dust being blown and suspended in air. 6
In summary, even if Los Altos isn’t as vulnerable to direct impacts from wildfires, it should be prepared for the indirect impact of air pollution.
Impacts on Los Altos’ Assets/Community Sectors
Information about the impacts of climate hazards was supplemented by a survey of the CAAP Task Force and a focus group with City staff and non-profit leaders.
Specifically, the CAAP Task Force was asked to rank what natural and built assets and facilities and what sectors of the economy were most important to Los Altos’ quality of life. Results receiving 40% or more are shown below.
Natural Environment
Assets
Asset Percent of Respondents
answering as Most
Important
Managed landscapes (yards, parks, street
trees)
80%
Air & air quality 70%
Natural habitat (soil, plants, wildlife) 40%
Creeks, rivers and other water bodies 40%
Local Assets
A former orchard, Los Altos has an incredible canopy of native and non-native trees on streets, in parks, and in homeowner’s yards. Those trees, along with a creek and the Santa Cruz mountains, grace the seal of the City. According to the City’s website, there are approximately 12,000 trees on Los Altos streets creating a stunning tree canopy, which helps to promote better air quality, cooler summers, natural shade and less reliance on air conditioning.”7
In addition to trees, yards and parks are well regarded by residents. Shoup Park and the Redwood Grove Nature Preserve were mentioned multiple times by respondents as assets that provide a real sense of nature. The Hillside Trail connecting both parks features a boardwalk along Adobe Creek. 7 https://www.losaltosca.gov/publicworks/page/tree-maintenance, accessed May 6, 2021 6 California State Hazard Mitigation Plan, California Office of Emergency Services, 2018, SECTION 9.1 - PAGE 583
152 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
417
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Adobe Creek along with Stevens Creek, Permanente Creek and Hale Creek are significant natural features that provide habitat corridors that connect beyond Los Altos’ boundaries and contribute to groundwater recharge. Their importance is demonstrated by a pending (2021) lawsuit regarding pollution from a permit for Lehigh Quarry expansion upstream.
In such a verdant city, it is not surprising that many respondents in the CAAP Task Force mentioned air quality as an important asset. Outdoor recreation and outdoor living are prized and are dependent on comfortable temperatures and clean air.
Description of Impacts & Sensitivities
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
The biggest impact of extreme temperatures and extended heat waves on the natural environment will be heat stress on plants with the potential for slow native species die-out and replacement by non-native species. These tipping points will depend on many factors including species and age.
Managed landscapes will require greater care and watering. California Water Service predicts roughly 3.5% increase in mean temperature by 2040 and will correspond to a roughly 2% increase in demand.8 Home gardeners and city staff may find formerly tried and true ornamental plants less reliable – or untenable due to new ordinances or demand management measures. Having dealt with drought, Parks & Facilities staff has a reasonable capacity to manage the landscape for temperature increases and increased drought. The capacity of native, non-native, and ornamental plants to survive in a hotter, drier climate is not known.
Precipitation & Flooding
Severe precipitation and repeated flooding may increase stream bank erosion and flooding and erosion of managed landscapes. As the probability of multiple severe winter storms increases toward the end of the century, downed trees may be more common as trees rooted in soils saturated from previous storm events contend with heavy winds.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
Acres burned in Los Altos is expected to decrease. Increases in acres burned in the Santa Cruz mountain areas surrounding Los Altos are expected to be minor.
Thankfully, Redwood Grove is being managed by Parks & Facilities staff for wildfire, as redwoods are not native to Los Altos and so require extra care. The greatest wildfire risk to Los Altos is expected to be from wildfires in and even beyond the Santa Cruz mountains creating unhealthy levels of air pollution in Los Altos.
Built Environment
8 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Los Altos Suburban District, p. 36 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 153 ATTACHMENT 2
418
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Assets
Asset Percent Selecting as
Most Important
Housing 80%
Schools 60%
Transportation (roads, sidewalks, buses, trains,
parking spots & bike racks)
40%
Utilities (power, drinking water, stormwater &
sewer, natural gas, phone, internet)
40%
Description of Local Assets
Buildings
The built environment includes all the public and private buildings, structures, and infrastructure that people in Los Altos rely on for shelter, commerce, and the functions of daily life. (Commercial assets are described in the Economy section.) Los Altos is primarily a bedroom community where most residents live in single-family homes, although there is multi-family housing as well. Many elderly residents live in retirement communities and senior centers. Housing was the asset most chosen by CAAP Task force members as most important.
Los Altos has more than a dozen school facilities across multiple campuses, as well as more than thirty child care/day care facilities, preschools, and tutoring centers that provide care and education to the youth of the City.
Focus group participants shared that theatres, galleries, and other cultural assets contribute to quality of life and should also be included as built environment assets.
In addition to the assets listed above, Los Altos has buildings for daily and emergency government services. Critical facilities include an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) co-located in the Municipal Service Center, the City Hall and Police Department, and Fire Stations. There are no hospitals located in Los Altos.
Infrastructure
Transportation assets include, most importantly, roads and bridges that connect drivers, bikers, and pedestrians to different neighborhoods, shopping centers, the freeway, and areas outside the City. Public parking supports commercial areas.
Water supply is a complex multi-jurisdictional hybrid natural and built system, including groundwater supply, surface water, and recycled water sources. While the sources are natural, the management includes sophisticated, interconnected built assets. CalWater (California Water Services) Los Altos Suburban District water supply comes from both wells and purchases from Santa Clara Valley Water District 154 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
419
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
(SCVWD) which partially imports water from the Federal Central Valley Project and San Francisco Power and Utility Corporation’s Regional Water System. The Los Altos Suburban District includes Los Altos, Cupertino, and other areas. There are a handful of water pumping stations in Los Altos.
Los Altos has a minority stake in the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP) along with Palo Alto, Mountain View, East Palo Alto, Stanford University, and Los Altos Hills. The City also owns a wastewater pump station to convey waste to the WQCP.
Stormwater management is provided naturally by Los Altos’ four creeks as well as by the Permanente Creek Diversion Channel and the storm sewer system – storm drains, catch basins and pipes below the street.
Description of Impacts & Sensitivities
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
Increases in temperature and extended heat waves will change the cooling needs of all building types and may tax the energy grid. Pacific Gas & Electric’s Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) to reduce wildfire risks during heat waves will require alternative and off-grid energy sources to cool homes, commercial, and government buildings. The recently constructed/renovated Los Altos High School and the Los Altos Community Center are high-performance buildings that may be better able to maintain comfortable temperatures during extreme heat.
In general, homeowners in Los Altos have the financial resources to adopt new technologies to manage heat and produce and store renewable energy. Fixed income homeowners and renters have less of an adaptive capacity.
Assisted care facilities have backup generators. Senior centers do not, according to discussions with the City’s emergency management coordinator. The City relies on Santa Clara County to provide cooling centers, in the form of public libraries.
Most transportation infrastructure will be unaffected by extreme heat and drought.
Risk of asphalt softening is limited to extended temperatures above 100°F. Safety power shut offs and brownouts caused by heat can cause outages of traffic signals and street lights. Extreme heat will increase use of private vehicles at the expense of walking, biking, and taking public transit.
Temperature changes and extreme heat throughout the region will impact the availability of the water supply in SCVWD’s system, which supplies as much as 65% of the water in the Los Altos Suburban District.9 Los Altos water is sourced locally and imported, although not from snow-fed Hetch Hetchy.10 If the Los Altos 10 Santa Clara County Operational Area Hazard Mitigation Plan, Office of Emergency Services, 2017, p. 113. 9 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Los Altos Suburban District, p. 47 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 155 ATTACHMENT 2
420
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Suburban District is partially protected from the risk of decreased snowpack in the Sierra Nevada mountains, nevertheless supply is projected to decrease by 3-18% by mid-century and 10-28% by 2100.11The projected decrease underscores how many of the critical systems and natural resources of Los Altos extend beyond its borders where climate change may produce more extreme impacts.
Water supply issues are heavily regulated and very much in the public eye, in contrast to the climate risk of extreme heat. To a degree, water suppliers are already preparing for climate change. CalWater is developing new water supplies to improve reliability. The impacts from climate change to Los Altos water availability may come indirectly through external adaptive measures like increased regulations, including updates to the State’s Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, prohibitions, and demand management measures, rather than severe restrictions.
Safety power shut offs and brownouts caused by heat can disrupt pumps in the water supply and wastewater systems.
Precipitation & Flooding12
Severe precipitation and repeated flooding may increase stream bank erosion and flooding, causing scour under the numerous bridges and creek crossings. Buried pipes may be exposed and/or damaged. Storm sewers may get backed up and cause localized flooding. With multiple heavy storms occurring yearly by the end of the century, wear and tear on roads and within pipes may require repair and replacement more frequently than planned for.
Los Altos has experienced limited flooding of homes or structures, although there are many buildings that have a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding, according to FEMA flood maps. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling outside of this report scope would be needed to understand how the risk of flooding in specific areas may increase in the future.
Los Altos already has a Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan which includes an assessment of flood-prone storm drain catchments among its prioritization criteria.
With some changes, this document and the capital planning that results from it can integrate climate risks to adapt to the risks from precipitation changes.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
Wildfires pose a greater hazard to structures, including homes and above ground assets, than to underground assets. Air pollution from wildfires outside of Los Altos 12 Although Los Altos is not coastal and so not directly at risk from sea level rise, sea level rise will have an impact on groundwater supply and the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plan. 11 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Los Altos Suburban District, p. 70. Projections estimated based on climate change impacts on the mix of groundwater, local surface water, and purchased imports relative to the historic average of available supply.
156 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
421
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
does not have a significant impact on buildings and infrastructure, simply requiring changing filters on buildings and vehicle fleets more frequently.
Economy
The impact of climate hazards on the economy are hard to predict. Climate extremes will generally cause more wear and tear of physical assets, leading to shorter lifespans and faster replacement cycles for buildings and infrastructure.
Increased spending on maintenance will be needed. Disasters cause a drop and then rise in expenditures, following Federal assistance and insurance payouts, though in sum disasters produce both environmental and economic losses.
Description of Local Assets
Los Altos has several areas of economic activity, as listed in the economic element of the General Plan. Listed roughly from north to south, these are Sherwood Gateway (including the Village Court Shopping Center), El Camino Real, Downtown, Rancho Shopping Center, Loyola Corners, Woodland Plaza, and Foothill Plaza.
When asked what sectors of the economy were most important to quality of life, most survey participants responded that School District/City Spending (60%) and Restaurants (60%) were most important. Half of survey participants responded that real estate, development, and construction as a single sector were important. Fewer than half of respondents selected retail, the service sector, or tech/IT.
Property taxes on Los Altos housing provides the key revenue source for City finances. At the same time, the affordable housing shortage throughout the Bay Area extends to Los Altos, affecting the disposable income available for other purchases.
Description of Impacts & Sensitivities
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
Temperature, extreme heat, and drought are most likely to cause a negative effect on the economy as residents and businesses spend more on air conditioning (and California-wide on food) to maintain the same quality of life. Outdoor living is important to quality of life and outdoor comfort is an important free asset for downtown restaurants and retail businesses.
Decreasing comfort negatively impacts worker productivity and may disrupt outdoor businesses like landscaping and construction. Temperature-related mortality is also a projected loss. Power outages and brownouts caused by extreme heat will also negatively impact the economy through everything from loss of perishable items to adding uncertainty to business operations. Expensive solutions for managing electricity unreliability like diesel generators add environmental externalities. At the same time, the COVID-19 pandemic has been longer lasting and more far reaching than most of the direct climate hazards of the near future.
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 157 ATTACHMENT 2
422
Agenda Item # 9.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
Precipitation & Flooding
Property damage and temporary disruption of utilities and infrastructure can create temporary or extended loss of operations for businesses, particularly for businesses with non-durable goods. Even perceptions of flood risk and flood safety can influence the housing market.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
Temporary disruption of utilities and infrastructure from wildfire-related PSPS can create temporary or extended loss of operations. When poor air quality keeps people in their home, they are less likely to spend in Los Altos’ commercial centers.
Vulnerable Populations
Description of Impacts & Sensitivities
Temperature, Extreme Heat & Drought
Projected temperature changes will impact the seasonality and frequency of outdoor recreation, biking and walking, and even passive enjoyment of the outdoors.
Outdoor comfort will increase in winter, spring, and fall and decrease in summer.
Parks, yards, and other outdoor areas will become undesirable during heat waves, and parking lots and streets may become dangerous to certain populations during extreme heat.
From medical and sociological research, we know that certain populations are more vulnerable to extreme heat. However, not all of these populations exist in Los Altos.
Based on CAAP Task Force survey respondents, the vulnerable populations present in Los Altos include the elderly, people with chronic or pre-existing medical conditions, people with disabilities, children, and people with limited English proficiency. If projected temperature changes are experienced, incidences of heat stroke, hospitalization, and heat-related mortality will increase first and foremost within these groups.
While only 40% of Task Force survey respondents selected “people who work outside” as a vulnerable group, a subsequent focus group confirmed that day laborers in landscaping and construction are a vulnerable population who may commute into Los Altos to work outdoors. Los Altos does not have experience providing services or communications to this population, so managing their health risk will be a challenge.
The focus group additionally identified seniors who are “house rich, cash poor,” and may potentially be impacted by increased costs of energy as temperatures increase.
Assisted care facilities have backup generators, but senior centers do not. Santa Clara County libraries act as the city’s cooling centers. 158 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
423
Agenda Item # 9.
Figure 12: Graph showing how CAAP Task Force members responded to question asking them to identify which vulnerable populations are present in Los Altos Precipitation & Flooding
Vulnerable populations often have fewer resources and/or limited mobility.
Preparations for flooding, evacuations, and clean-ups are all made more difficult by these circumstances.
Wildfires & Air Pollution
While flooding is likely to be limited to areas near the City’s four creeks, the impacts of wildfires may be felt citywide. Like flooding though, preparations, evacuations, returns, and clean up are all more difficult for vulnerable populations: people with limited mobility and functionality, people with chronic or pre-existing medical conditions which could be exacerbated by poor air quality, and people with limited financial resources.
Long before emergency situations, air pollution will directly impact people with respiratory conditions and people who work outside. Wildfires far outside of Los Altos can create unhealthy levels of PM 2.5, especially since existing air quality is only moderate to start with. Air pollution can limit the mobility and quality of life of sensitive groups.
The N-95 masks which are now easy to obtain and with which people are now very familiar with as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic may mean that air quality will not limit activity for vulnerable groups as much as it might have without the pandemic.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 159 ATTACHMENT 2
424
Agenda Item # 9.
Summary
Los Altos appears better off than many other areas in California with regards to climate change. Los Altos is not directly coastal so it will not experience the impacts of sea level rise, but its relative proximity to the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay should temper climate extremes in the near term. Earthquakes are projected to be a relatively more common and more damaging hazard than any single climate hazard.
Many of the impacts of climate change on Los Altos will not be direct but instead reverberations from nearby. Los Altos depends on the natural environment, the water supply system, and the energy grid outside of its borders, so the availability and affordability of water and energy within Los Altos are likely to be jeopardized by climate change across the Bay Area and California as a whole.
Within Los Altos itself, by mid-century particularly under a high emissions scenario, the number of extreme heat days are projected to increase substantially. Heat and poor air quality from wildfires outside of Los Altos are most likely to impact the quality of life, particularly for vulnerable populations, and increase energy demands for additional building air cooling/filtering. Extreme heat, poor air quality, and blackouts or PSPS that occur simultaneously will present novel emergency situations that have the potential to strain or overwhelm City resources.
Similarly and more uncertain will be the resilience of Los Altos natural and maintained landscapes. The annual precipitation amounts in Los Altos are not likely to change, but will become less consistent and in combination with expected temperature increases will in turn increase the amount of water that plants need.
Considering water pressure outside of Los Altos, it is likely that water customers will face financial incentives and regulatory pressure to reduce daily water use.
In the winter and spring, seasonal storms which Los Altos has experienced in the past are likely to continue. Rainfall amounts that used to occur once every several years are projected to occur multiple times a year by the end of the century, increasing the need for maintenance and repair of stormwater infrastructure on building sites and across the city.
Los Altos’ government, residents, and businesses are somewhat prepared after living through years of drought and the COVID pandemic. The scale of climate change and the need to reach new vulnerable populations during heat waves may be challenging.
APPENDIX H: CLIMATE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS, CA CONTINUED
160 LOS ALTOS ▶▶▶ CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION PLAN ▶▶▶ 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
425
Agenda Item # 9.
i
CITY OF LOS ALTOS CLIMATE ACTION AND ADAPTATION
PLAN
INITIAL STUDY
Administrative Draft 1
City of Los Altos
February 2022
ATTACHMENT 3
426
Agenda Item # 9.
ATTACHMENT 3
427
Agenda Item # 9.
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................... 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED....................................................8 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ......................................................................................... 11 I. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................. 11 II. Agricultural and Forest Resources............................................................................. 12 III. Air Quality................................................................................................................. 13 IV. Biological Resources ................................................................................................. 15 V. Cultural Resources .................................................................................................... 17 VI. Energy ...................................................................................................................... 18 VII. Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................... 19 VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ....................................................................................... 21 IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials............................................................................. 23 X. Hydrology and Water Quality ...................................................................................24 XI. Land Use and Planning ............................................................................................. 27 XII. Mineral Resources..................................................................................................... 27 XIII. Noise ........................................................................................................................28 XIV. Parks and Recreation ................................................................................................29 XV. Population and Housing............................................................................................ 30 XVI. Public Services .......................................................................................................... 31 XVII. Transportation.......................................................................................................... 32 XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources .......................................................................................... 34 XIX. Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................... 35 XX. Wildfire ..................................................................................................................... 37 XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................................... 38 IV. LIST OF PREPARERS..........................................................................................................40 ATTACHMENT 3
428
Agenda Item # 9.
ATTACHMENT 3
429
Agenda Item # 9.
1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1. Introduction and Purpose
This Initial Study of environmental impacts is being prepared to conform to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations 15000 et seq.), and the regulations and policies of the City of Los Altos. This initial Study evaluates potential environmental impacts that might reasonably be anticipated to result from adoption and implementation of the proposed Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
2. Project Title: Los Altos Climate Action and Adaptation Plan
3. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Los Altos Planning Division
1 N San Antonio Rd
Los Altos, CA 94022
4. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Laura Simpson, Sustainability Coordinator
(926) 367-5975
5. Project Location:
Citywide
6. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:
City of Los Altos Planning Division
1 N San Antonio Rd
Los Altos, CA 94022
7. General Plan and Zoning Designations: All—The project applies citywide to every General Plan designation and zoning district.
8. Description of Project:
PURPOSE
The City of Los Altos is developing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) which will include an update to the greenhouse gas inventory and evaluate its sources of impact in order to determine implementation actions to reduce emissions.
ATTACHMENT 3
430
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 2 In 2013, Los Altos’ first Climate Action Plan was released, calling for 15% reduction in GHG emissions by 2020 as compared to 2005 levels. This update to the City’s Climate Action Plan includes an adaptation section to prepare for the local impacts of climate change and represents the next step in the journey towards a sustainable, healthy, equitable future. The update provides a pathway to the City’s bolder GHG reduction target as well as a framework for a climate resilient community.
LOCATION
Los Altos is located in the San Francisco Bay Area, in Santa Clara County. As shown in Figure 1, Los Altos is situated in the northern portion of Santa Clara County, along the San Francisco Bay Peninsula. The city is bordered by Los Altos Hills to the west, Palo Alto to the north, Mountain View and Sunnyvale to the east, and Cupertino to the south.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City’s 2013 Climate Action Plan was designed to serve as a guiding document towards GHG reductions, both in municipal operations and community wide. It was designed as a comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions in a manner consistent with state guidelines and regulations, and to identify cost-effective opportunities for existing and future residents, businesses, and development projects for a more sustainable community. At the same time, the CAP provided a framework for the environmental leadership and an educational resource to the community. The CAP update provides a pathway to the City’s bolder GHG reduction target, as well as a framework for a climate resilient community.
The goals of the CAAP are:
• Reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
• Increase climate resilience (SB 379 compliance)
• Demonstrate leadership
This Initial Study specifically evaluates the local measures proposed to reduce emissions in Los Altos. The proposed CAAP addresses eight (8) focus areas, as identified below. • Transportation—Reduce Single-Occupancy Vehicle Travel, Electrify Transportation • Energy—Reduce Energy Consumption, Facilitate Building Decarbonization, Increase Solar Energy and Battery Storage
• Resource Conservation—Reduce Consumption and Waste
• Municipal Operations—Operate Sustainable Municipal Buildings, Reduce Municipal VMT, Promote Green Municipal Practices, Integrate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Functions,
ATTACHMENT 3
431
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3 • Green Community—Develop Nature-Based Solutions
• Climate Risk—Understand and Reduce Physical Risk
• Emergency Preparedness—Integrate Adaptation into Emergency Preparedness and Response
• Resilient Community—Educate and Protect Residents
Each focus area proposes specific measures and actions the City will take to reduce GHG emissions in Los Altos. Table 1 identifies the proposed measures and actions to be included in the CAP.
Table 1: Proposed Climate Action and Adaptation Plan Measures and Actions Focus Area 1: Transportation
1.1 Create a Walkable and Bikeable City
A Fully implement the 2021 Complete Streets Master Plan by 2035 and make adjustments as needed to comply with VMT reduction objectives B Create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and other community and commercial spaces throughout the city
C Develop a new Parking Management Strategy that supports strategic VMT reduction
1.2 Promote Smart Growth Strategies
A Support Transit-Oriented Development
B Encourage Live Near Work incentives
C Promote Work From Home policies and infrastructure
1.3 Support Shared Mobility
A Develop an electric shuttle program and shared bike, ebike and scooter programs as alternatives to SOV travel
B Expand transit service and transit stop amenities
C Partner with adjacent cities to improve first/last mile options D Require commercial Transportation Demand Management programs E Work with Los Altos School Districts to reduce VMT
F Develop and promote community carshare and carpool programs
1.4 Accelerate Electric Vehicle Adoption
A Increase education & awareness of available EV resources and incentive programs B Actively promote EV adoption and require EV parking
1.5 Install Community-Wide Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment A Increase the number of available Level 2 EV charging stations in commercial and multifamily areas
B Create a citywide network of DC Fast Charging (DCFC) stations C Double the current Electric Vehicle charging and pre-wiring requirements in future Reach Code updates
ATTACHMENT 3
432
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 4 D Identify grants and incentives to install EV charging including DCFC, solar EV charging, and paired EV charging + battery storage systems Focus Area 2: Energy
2.1 Fund or Support Energy Efficiency Incentive Programs A Perform residential and commercial energy audits
B Increase residential energy efficiency
2.2 Require All-Electric New Buildings and Major Retrofits A Adopt bold Reach Codes and expand to include large additions, ADUs and major remodels
2.3 Increase Fuel Switching in Existing Buildings
A Increase residential fuel switching
B Increase commercial fuel switching
2.4 Disincentivize Methane Gas
A Consider a fee on the use of methane gas
2.5 Eliminate Off-Road Fossil Fuel Engines
A Phase out off-road fossil fuel engines such as landscaping equipment
2.6 Work Towards Development of Net Zero Buildings
A Increase community solar
B Increase community solar + storage
Topic 3: Resource Conservation
3.1 Continue to Decrease Waste
A Increase the landfill diversion rate
B Work to eliminate single-use plastics
C Reduce waste from construction and building materials
3.2 Conserve Water
A Increase water efficiency in buildings and landscapes
3.3 Promote a Circular Economy
A Promote sustainable food choices
B Increase knowledge of responsible goods & services consumption Topic 4: Municipal Operations
4.1 Increase Building Efficiency
A Audit appropriate City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades
4.2 Explore Solar + Storage at City facilities
A Build new City buildings to Net Zero standards
B Include options for battery storage and explore feasibility of developing a microgrid for savings and resilience
4.3 Convert the City's Fleet to Electric Vehicles
A Develop a phase-out schedule to replace all City-owned fleet vehicles with electric versions
ATTACHMENT 3
433
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
5 4.4 Encourage Sustainable Employee Commute and Business Travel A Improve City staff use of commute alternatives to single-occupant vehicles B Develop Work From Home and flexible schedule policies
4.5 Expand Responsible Procurement
A Adopt a zero-waste policy for City facilities and City-sponsored events.
4.6 Incorporate Climate Action and Adaptation into City Policy, Budget, Planning, & Internal Standards
A Account for climate change in all new City projects
B Incorporate climate preparedness into City programs, operations, and maintenance protocols
C Integrate CAAP goals into the budget process
Topic 5: Green Community
5.1 Expand Green Infrastructure & Improve Water Resilience A Update building code to incentivize rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling; install systems at municipal facilities
B Create water-efficient buildings and landscapes - Expand green infrastructure program to reduce overall surface area of and capture runoff from paved areas (streets, parking lots, driveways)
C Determine feasibility of using recycled water from Regional Water Quality Control Plant
5.2 Explore Carbon Sequestration Opportunities and Expand Natural Environments A Increase urban tree canopy
B Expand parks and natural wooded spaces
C Explore carbon farming opportunities
Topic 6: Climate Risk
6.1 Reduce Flood Risk
A Conduct updated flood risk study with capital and policy recommendations B Develop and implement comprehensive riparian ecosystem restoration plan and relevant floodplain management policies
C Expand green infrastructure program to reduce overall surface area of and capture runoff from paved areas (streets, parking lots, driveways) D Develop "Ready to Go" automatic property buyout program to demolish buildings damaged in future floods
6.2 Reduce Heat Risk
A Conduct heat study/mapping to identify areas of Urban Heat Island B Enact reflectivity standards for asphalt and ground level surfaces; enact reflectivity/green roof standards for roofs
C Promote alternative building cooling strategies
Topic 7: Emergency Preparedness
7.1 Ensure Safety During Extreme Heat
ATTACHMENT 3
434
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 6 A Develop citywide heat management plan
B Determine feasibility of implementing a Los Altos-specific early warning system for heat health
C Develop temperature/heat safety protocols for outdoor workers - educate and enforce
D Adjust/extend park and public facility hours during heat waves E Expand public drinking fountains/refillable water stations
7.2 Ensure Safety During Unhealthy Air Events
A Determine feasibility of an early warning system for air quality B Purchase and distribute N-95 masks to vulnerable populations to filter air pollution Topic 8: Resilient Community
8.1 Establish Resilience Hubs
A Determine emergency preparedness of all facilities serving vulnerable populations and feasibility for making them climate resilient for existing population and the public B Identify, fund, and prepare existing and new public facilities to serve as resilience hubs
8.2 Identify and Protect Vulnerable Community Members
A Plan outreach for and educate vulnerable populations (e.g., isolated seniors, outdoor workers, long-term care residents) and the people and institutions that care for them
8.3 Improve Climate Literacy & Risk Understanding
A Enact requirement for flood hazard risk disclosure in property sales/during real estate process
B Update Community Emergency Response Training (CERT) to include growing climate hazards
C Launch a Community Climate Action Grant
9. Potential Physical Changes
The CAAP does not propose any structures, land uses, or other features (e.g., freeways, railroad tracks) that would physically change the existing community. Rather, the CAAP includes strategies and measures to improve connectivity within Los Altos and to promote alternative transportation methods.
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required:
The City of Los Altos has sole approval authority over the CAP Update. There are no other public agencies whose approval is required.
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section ATTACHMENT 3
435
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.?
No California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area have requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1. The CAAP does not propose any structures, land uses, or other features (e.g., freeways, railroad tracks) that would physically change the existing community.
ATTACHMENT 3
436
Agenda Item # 9.
8 II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Energy
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use/Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Parks and Recreation
Population/Housing
Public Services
Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems
Wildfire
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Determination:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ATTACHMENT 3
437
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
9 including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
______________________________________________________ _________________ Signature Date
ATTACHMENT 3
438
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 10 ATTACHMENT 3
439
Agenda Item # 9.
11 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. AESTHETICS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Aesthetics Discussion
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Proposed CAAP measures and actions encourage the use of energy-efficient and green building design features, which may include cool roofs or photovoltaic systems. Building permits required to comply with the City’s Green Building Ordinance are subject to a design review process required by the ordinance to ensure there are no adverse effects on scenic vistas. Therefore, no impact would result.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway?
There are no state scenic highways located in Los Altos. Therefore, no impact would result. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?)
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
440
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
12 d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Implementation of the CAAP may include the use of photovoltaic panels or replacement of outdoor lighting fixtures on residential or commercial structures throughout the city. Solar panels do not reflect light, are not visible at night, and would not create a new source of substantial glare. New or replacement lighting fixtures are subject to review under the City’s community design guidelines to minimize effects of day or nighttime views. No impacts would result.
II. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California agricultural land evaluation and site assessment model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significantly environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California department of forestry and fire protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the forest and range assessment project and the forest legacy assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in forest protocols adopted by the California air resources board.
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as
defined by Governmental Code Section 51104(g))?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
441
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
13 Agricultural and Forest Resources Discussion
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or mature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? The CAAP is a policy document that provides strategies to reduce GHG emissions in the city. No conversion of farmland is proposed. Additionally, the CAAP promotes the creation of additional urban open spaces within the city that could be used as recreational or community garden space.
There is no land zoned for agricultural use or with active Williamson Act1 contracts located in Los Altos. No impact would result.
III. AIR QUALITY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ 1 “Williamson Act and Open Space Easement.” County of Santa Clara Department of Planning and Development, https://plandev.sccgov.org/policies-programs/williamson-act-and-open-space-easement.
ATTACHMENT 3
442
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
14 a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The City is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). In accordance with the California Clean Air Act, the BAAQMD is required to prepare and update an air quality plan that outlines measures by which both stationary and mobile sources of pollutants can be controlled to achieve federal and state air quality standards in areas designated as nonattainment. The SFBAAB is designated as a nonattainment area for the California standards for ozone, respirable particulate matter (PM10), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and for the federal standard for ozone and PM2.5. The SFBAAB is designated an attainment or unclassified area for all other pollutants. 2 In April 2017, the BAAQMD adopted the 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate, 3 which includes 85 control measures to reduce ozone precursors, particulate matter, toxic air contaminants, and GHGs. Although the purpose and intended effect of the CAAP is to reduce GHG emissions generated in the City to help reduce the effects of climate change, many of its actions would also reduce air pollutant emissions. For example, proposed CAAP actions 1.1 through 1.5, 4.3, and 4.4 promote alternative modes of transportation, support the use of alternatively fueled vehicles (e.g., electric), and encourage land use planning practices that directly reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT), which reduces fossil fuel use and associated air pollutant emissions. Thus, the CAAP is consistent with the 2017 Clean Air Plan and would have no impact related to a conflict with or obstruction of the applicable air quality plan.
No impact would result.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? As described above, the SFBAAB is designated as a nonattainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not directly result in construction or operational impacts related to an increase of criteria air pollutants. Some of the proposed CAAP measures, such as increased solar panel and EV infrastructure requirements, could indirectly result in an increase in construction activities for future developments; however, emissions from these additional construction activities would likely be negligible compared to the overall construction activities. Discretionary developments would also be required to undergo CEQA review. Furthermore, many of the GHG reduction measures proposed in the CAAP would also reduce criteria air pollutants. Therefore, no impact would result. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2017. Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status. Available at:
http://www.baaqmd.gov/research-and-data/air-quality-standards-and-attainment-status, accessed February 16, 2022. Last updated January 5, 2017.
3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 2017. 2017 Clean Air Plan: Spare the Air, Cool the Climate. April 19.
ATTACHMENT 3
443
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
15 The term “sensitive receptor” refers to a location where individuals are more susceptible to poor air quality. The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would increase air pollutant emissions in the City. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not generate air pollutant emissions that would result in the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No impact would result. d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
As described above, the CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not generate emissions, such as odors, which would adversely affect a substantial number of people. No impact would result.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
444
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
16 a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Special status plants include those listed as “Endangered,” “Threatened,” or “Candidate for Listing” by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) or the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), are included in the California Rare Plant Rank, or are considered special status in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations. Special-status animals include those listed as “Endangered,” “threatened,” or “Candidate for Listing” by the CDFW or the USFWS, are designated as “Watch List,” “Species of Special Concern,” or “Fully Protected” by the CDFW, or are considered “Birds of Conservation Concern” by the USFWS. While there are occurrences of plant and animal species with special status in Los Altos, the CAAP measures do not propose new development that would interfere with any riparian habitats or sensitive natural communities.
Therefore, no impact would result.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
The physical environmental changes that could occur as a result of implementation of the proposed CAAP measures would take place within the built environment or as part of a planned City-approved project. Where solar PV panels are installed on existing buildings or structures, no impact on riparian habitat and sensitive natural communities would occur. Where solar PV panels are installed as part of a new development project, the project would, if necessary, be required to undergo separate environmental review prior to approval of any development with the potential to degrade the habitat of any threatened or endangered species. If new projects are proposed in areas where sensitive natural communities, such as riparian habitat, freshwater marsh, or native grasslands occur, mandatory compliance with local, state, and federal regulations would be required. Therefore, no impact would result.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Wetlands and other waters are protected under the federal Clean Water Act and the state’s Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and are under the jurisdiction of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board. Federal and state regulations require avoidance of impacts to the extent feasible, and compensation for unavoidable losses of jurisdictional wetlands and waters. Implementation of proposed CAAP measures would occur within the built environment or as part of a planned City-approved project, which, if necessary, would undergo separate environmental review. If new projects are proposed in areas of freshwater marsh, seasonal wetlands, or emergent marsh or other wetlands on or adjacent to the site, mandatory compliance with local, state, and federal regulations would be required. Therefore, no impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
445
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
17 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The spatial arrangement of habitat and barriers affects the location, movement patterns, foraging dynamics, and persistence of plant and animal species. The extent of urbanization in the city and adjacent communities restricts opportunities for movement and dispersal of native wildlife and plant species. Common urban features such as roadways, rail lines, fencing, buildings, and hardscape represent barriers to wildlife movement and dispersal. The best opportunities for animal and fish movement exist along the riparian corridors in the city. In addition, existing mature trees provide nesting opportunities for migratory birds. The proposed CAAP would not affect the number or location of these mature trees. Therefore, as wildlife movement corridors in the city are limited and mature trees would not be affected, no impact would result. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
All structures, programs, and projects to be completed under the proposed CAP would be subject to the oversight and review processes envisioned by the General Plan and established in the Municipal Code, including those protecting biological resources. Additionally, the General Plan and Municipal Code are consistent with all other local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Therefore, implementation of the proposed CAAP would have no conflict with and no impact on any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Los Altos is not located within the study area of the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan or any other identified habitat conservation plans. Therefore, no impact would result.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ATTACHMENT 3
446
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
18 a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
Multiple measures in the CAAP call for the installation of solar photovoltaic panel projects on residential and nonresidential structures and on City-owned facilities. Implementation of these proposed CAAP measures would occur within the built environment or as part of a separate Cityapproved project, which if necessary, would be subject to separate environmental review pursuant to CEQA. Therefore, while certain facilities or equipment installed pursuant to the proposed CAAP could potentially affect cultural and archaeological resources, all structures, programs, and projects completed under the proposed CAP would be subject to the oversight and review processes established in the Municipal Code, including those related to historical, archeological, and paleontological resources and human remains. Additionally, projects carried out under the proposed CAAP would be obligated to cease construction or other activities and report any discovery of potentially significant cultural or anthropological resources in compliance with state law (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code). Accordingly, such discoveries would be subject to the jurisdiction of anthropological or tribal experts, who would be responsible for inspection and potential relocation of discovered cultural resources. No impact would result. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
VI. ENERGY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☒
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? ATTACHMENT 3
447
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
19 The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not result in construction or operational impacts related to wasteful consumption of energy resources. The CAAP is a policy document containing climate action measures to reduce Citywide GHG emissions, including those emissions generated by energy demand and supply. For example, actions 1.1 through 1.5, 4.3, and 4.4 promote alternative modes of transportation, support the use of alternatively fueled vehicles (e.g., electric), and encourage land use planning practices that directly reduce vehicle trips and VMT, which reduces fossil fuel use. Actions 2.1 through 2.6, 4.1, and 4.2 promote energy efficiency in residential, commercial, and municipal buildings, as well as increased use of renewable energy.
Thus, the CAAP would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. No impact would result.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? The CAAP would support (and not conflict with) the requirements of the California State Green Building Code (CALGreen) and Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which ensure that future projects operate in an energy efficient manner. Furthermore, action 2.2 of the CAAP requires new buildings and major retrofits to be all-electric by adopting codes that go beyond the Title 24 standards. Therefore, no impact would result.
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication
42. ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ iv. Landslides? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
448
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
20 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
direct or indirect risks to life or property?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic feature? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides?
The City is located within the central portion of the Coast Ranges geomorphic province, which includes numerous active faults identified by the California Geological Survey under the AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The City is not located within or adjacent to an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone; however, the City is located between the San Andreas and Hayward faults, as well as numerous smaller faults, and is susceptible to strong seismic ground shaking in the event of a major earthquake. Slopes in the southwest portion of the City are susceptible to earthquake-induced landslides and liquefaction could occur along the edges of creeks.4 The proposed CAAP measures do not direct construction of new structures where people or property would be more exposed to seismic risks. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Furthermore, any discretionary 4 California Geological Survey, 2002. Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation Cupertino Quadrangle. September 23.
ATTACHMENT 3
449
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
21 developments that are required to comply with measures from the CAAP would be subject to the City’s existing grading regulations specifically designed to reduce soil erosion. Therefore, no impact would result.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning.
Discretionary development projects that help to achieve the CAAP goals would be subject to applicable engineering and City building code requirements specifically designed to reduce potential geological hazards and damages. Therefore, no impact would result. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Refer to (c) above. No impact would result.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Refer to (c) above. No impact would result.
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in the destruction of unique paleontological resources or geologic features. Any discretionary developments that are required to comply with measures in the proposed CAAP (e.g., increased solar panel installations or EV parking) would be required to undergo CEQA review. Therefore, no impact would result.
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
450
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
22 a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
The CAAP includes an updated inventory of the City’s GHG emissions, as well as a series of emissions forecasts for 2050. First a Business-As-Usual (BAU) forecast was developed to estimate the City’s emissions without any additional action from federal, State, or local governments. The City’s BAU emissions are expected to increase from 111,320 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e) in 2018 to 116,346 MTCO2e in 2050. To project the City’s emissions in 2050 including the expected impacts of State and local actions, an Adjusted Business-As-Usual (ABAU) forecast was developed which includes expected increases in fuel economy and building energy efficiency in California, increased EV adoption in Los Altos specifically, and the expected increase in air conditioning use due to increased temperatures related to climate change. This forecast shows that, with the inclusion of these additional factors, the City’s emissions are expected to decline from 111,320 MTCO2e in 2018 to 70,800 MTCO2e in 2050.
One of the primary goals of the CAAP is to set the City on a path towards carbon neutrality by 2035. Implementation of the City’s existing 2021 Reach Codes5 and 2013 Climate Action Plan6 actions along with State and local measures included in the ABAU scenario will reduce the City’s emissions from 111,320 MTCO2e in 2018 to 67,160 MTCO2e in 2035. To achieve the carbon neutrality goal, the CAAP proposes actions and policies that aim to reduce the City’s net emissions by an additional 60,000 MTCO2e by 2030 and a further 15,000 MTCO2e by 2035. As a result, implementation of the CAAP would reduce the City’s emissions from 111,320 MTCO2e in 2018 to 5,090 MTCO2e in 2035 and the remaining GHG emissions will be sequestered through nature-based solutions (e.g., increasing tree canopy and enhancing green spaces). Therefore, no impact would result.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
The CAAP proposes actions and policies to switch from fossil fuel use in buildings and residences to clean renewable electrical energy, reduce VMT, electrify transportation, and increase walking, bicycling, and shared transportation. As discussed above, one of the primary goals of the CAAP is to set the City on a path towards carbon neutrality by 2035, which is more aggressive than the GHG reduction goals established in the California Air Resources Board’s 2017 Scoping Plan.
Transportation and land use measures in the proposed CAAP also promote implementation of the Sustainable Communities Strategy for the Bay Area (Plan Bay Area 2050) required by Senate Bill (SB) 375. Therefore, the CAAP implements rather than conflicts with state regulations and applicable plans to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, no impact would result. 5 On November 10, 2020, the City Council adopted Reach Code Ordinances 2020-470A, 2020-470B, 2020-470C and 2020-471 that will help the City achieve its sustainability goals moving forward. 6 City of Los Altos, 2013. City of Los Altos Climate Action Plan. December.
ATTACHMENT 3
451
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
23 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼-mile of an existing or proposed school?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
The routine transport, use, or disposal of these hazardous materials would not pose a significant hazard to the public or environment unless the hazardous materials were accidentally spilled or released into the environment. The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in an increase in the use of hazardous materials.
Therefore, no impact would result.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, no impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
452
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
24 c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within ¼-mile of an existing or proposed school?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in the emissions of handling of hazardous materials near existing or proposed schools. Therefore, no impact would result.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in the disturbance of a hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Any discretionary developments that are required to comply with measures in the proposed CAAP (e.g., increased solar panel installations or EV parking) would be required to undergo CEQA review. Therefore, no impact would result. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? The City is not located within an airport land use plan. Therefore, no impact would result. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
The City is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would result. g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would expose people or structures to wildland fire hazards. Therefore, no impact would result.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
453
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
25 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede sustainable groundwater management
of the basin?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
iv) impede or redirect flood flows? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiches zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
Proposed CAAP actions 5.1b and 6.1c would expand the City’s green infrastructure program to reduce the overall surface area of and capture runoff from paved areas, require water efficient landscaping, install porous paving in parking lots and driveways, and implement other water percolation methods like bioswales to reduce stormwater runoff. By reducing stormwater runoff from sites, these actions can improve water quality and reduce the generation of wastewater.
Furthermore, activities pursued under the proposed CAAP would occur within the existing built environment and would be subject to the oversight, review processes, and standards envisioned by the General Plan, established in the Municipal Code, and/or otherwise required by state/federal regulations. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in an increase of groundwater demand or interfere with groundwater recharge.
Proposed CAAP actions 5.1a and 5.1c would promote rainwater harvesting and greywater recycling. As discussed above, actions 5.1b and 6.1c would expand the City’s green infrastructure ATTACHMENT 3
454
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
26 program to reduce stormwater runoff from sites and increase water percolation methods. Action
6.1b would also increase percolation to the ground by restoring the riparian ecosystem of creeks and adding managed ponds and dams to slow the flow of water. Therefore, no impact would result.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite? i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would adversely alter existing drainage patterns. As discussed above, proposed CAAP actions
5.1a, 5.1b, 5.1c, 6.1b, and 6.1c would reduce stormwater runoff and improve flow along creeks, which would reduce the potential for future developments to result in substantial erosion or flooding. Action 6.1a would require a Citywide flood risk study to support recommendations for replacement and rebuilding of undersized culverts and creek crossings. Action 6.1d would develop a "Ready to Go" automatic property buyout program to purchase vacant or developed land that experiences flooding beyond a certain threshold (e.g., more than 50% damaged) to prevent or remove property from the danger of flood hazards and to restore the floodplain to natural habitat. Therefore, no impact would result.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiches zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? The City is located five to six miles from the Bay with an elevation of about 75 feet or more above sea level, and therefore is not subject to inundation by seiche or tsunami. Portions of the City adjacent to creeks are within a 100-year flood hazard zone mapped by the Federal Emergency Management. The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would increase the risk of pollutants being released due to flooding. As discussed above, proposed CAAP actions 5.1 through 6.1 would reduce stormwater runoff and flood risks throughout the City. Therefore, no impact would result. e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. As discussed above, proposed CAAP actions 5.1 through 6.1 ATTACHMENT 3
455
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
27 would expand green infrastructure, improve water resilience, and reduce flood risk. Therefore, no impact would result.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Physically divide an established community?
The CAAP does not propose any structures, land uses, or other features (e.g., freeways, railroad tracks) that would physically divide an established community. The CAAP does not recommend any strategy or measure that would physically divide the community. Rather, the CAAP includes strategies and measures to improve connectivity within Los Altos and to promote alternative transportation methods. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The CAAP proposes strategies and measures to reduce GHG emissions. Implementing the CAAP may require some modification of existing City policies, including General Plan and zoning regulations. However, proposed CAAP strategies and measures would generally result in greater avoidance or mitigation of environmental effects, as the CAAP is designed to mitigate adverse environmental impacts associated with global climate change. For these reasons, although some changes to existing City policies and plans would result from adoption of the CAAP, the intent and impact would be beneficial.
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ATTACHMENT 3
456
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
28 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?
No significant mineral resources are located in the city. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
XIII. NOISE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
The CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning that would result in a substantial increase in ambient noise levels. Some of the proposed CAAP measures, such as increased solar panel and EV infrastructure requirements, could indirectly result in an increase in construction activities for future developments; however, noise from these additional construction activities would likely be negligible compared to the overall construction ATTACHMENT 3
457
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
29 activities. Discretionary developments would also be required to undergo CEQA review and comply with the City’s noise ordinance and regulations designed to reduce noise from construction activities. Furthermore, proposed CAAP actions 1.1, 1.3, and 4.4 promote alternative modes of transportation and encourage land use planning practices that directly reduce vehicle trips and VMT, which reduces ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? As discussed above, the CAAP does not propose new development projects or changes to land use and zoning. Some of the proposed CAAP measures, such as increased solar panel and EV infrastructure requirements, could indirectly result in an increase in construction activities for future developments; however, vibrations from these additional construction activities would likely be negligible compared to the overall construction activities. Discretionary developments would also be required to undergo CEQA review. Therefore, no impact would result. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The City is not located within an airport land use plan or in the vicinity of a private airstrip.
Therefore, no impact would result.
XIV. PARKS AND RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The proposed CAAP recommends fully implementing the 2021 Complete Streets Master Plan by 2035, which could indirectly increase resident use of existing and expanding bike lanes and paths.
Physical deterioration of existing recreation facilities, if any, would not be considered substantial ATTACHMENT 3
458
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
30 and would be in part offset by the recreational benefits of new bikeways and pedestrian facilities.
Therefore, no impact would result.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The CAAP recommends additional bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure through accelerated implementation of the 2021 Complete Streets Master Plan. Construction of new bicycle and pedestrian facilities would be subject to further CEQA analysis, General Plan policies, and engineering design standards to prevent adverse physical effects. No impact would result.
XV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The CAAP does not propose any new housing units or nonresidential growth beyond levels already considered in the Los Altos General Plan. Commercial and residential energy efficiency retrofits that may occur as a result of the CAAP would take place in businesses and homes already located in Los Altos to make the more energy-efficient, subject to compliance with the City’s Green Building Ordinance. Therefore, no impact would result. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Although proposed CAAP measures encourage energy-efficient retrofits for existing homes and new transit-oriented development projects, homes would not be displaced. Possible future development activities following adoption of the CAAP would likely lead to a greater mix of uses in the city and could result in more homes. Replacement housing would not be necessary.
Therefore, no impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
459
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
31 XVI. PUBLIC SERVICES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Police protection? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Schools? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Parks? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
Other public facilities? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities? Fire protection?
The CAP Update does not propose any new development and recommendations are consistent with the growth in housing and population anticipated in the Los Altos General Plan and do not propose any expansion of fire protection services or facilities. Therefore, compliance with existing regulations and standards would prevent any unanticipated demand on fire protection services.
No impact would result.
Police protection?
The CAP Update does not propose any new development and recommendations are consistent with the growth in housing and population anticipated in the Los Altos General Plan and would not increase the demand for police protection services to the extent that new police protection facilities would be required. Therefore, compliance with existing regulations and standards would not create unanticipated demand on police protection services. No impact would result.
Schools?
ATTACHMENT 3
460
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
32 The CAP Update does not propose any new development and recommendations are consistent with the growth in housing and population anticipated in the Los Altos General Plan and would not increase the demand for school-related services to the extent that new school facilities would be required. If such facilities were required, payment of impact fees for construction of new facilities would constitute sufficient migration for school facility impacts, consistent with state law. No impact would result.
Parks?
CAAP recommendations are consistent with the growth in housing and population anticipated in the Los Altos General Plan and would not increase the demand for additional parks. Construction of new parkland would be subject to further CEQA analysis, General Plan policies, and engineering design standards to prevent adverse physical effects. Therefore, no impact would result.
Other public facilities?
CAAP does not propose any new development recommendations would not result in the need for additional demand for libraries or other governmental services to the extent that new facilities would be required. The plan does encourage City facilities and conduct comprehensive energy efficiency upgrades focusing on energy-efficient lighting, motion sensors, appliances, and HVAC systems. Any necessary upgrades would enhance the environment and would not result in any negative environmental impacts. Therefore, compliance with existing regulations and standards would not create unanticipated demand on other public facilities. No impact would result.
XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15-
64.3, Subdivision (b)? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? ☐ ☐ ☒ ☐
a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
ATTACHMENT 3
461
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
33 b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15-64.3, Subdivision (b)? The CAP Update is a policy document containing measures and supporting foundational actions that are consistent with the City General Plan with many that are aimed at facilitating the implementation of local transportation regulations. For example, the CAP Update includes foundational actions that would support pedestrian and bicycle circulation and improved transportation alternatives, which would improve connectivity throughout the City. Actions include create a pedestrian-friendly Downtown and other community and commercial spaces throughout the city (1.1 B); develop an electric shuttle program and shared bike, ebike and scooter programs as alternatives to SOV travel (1.3 A); and identify grants and incentives to install EV charging including DCFC, solar EV charging, and paired EV charging + battery storage systems (1.5 D). No impact would result.
The CAP Update is a policy document containing measures and supporting foundational actions are consistent with the City General Plan with many that are aimed at facilitating the implementation of the local transportation regulations. For example, the CAP Update includes foundational actions that would support pedestrian and bicycle circulation and improved transportation alternatives, which would improve connectivity throughout the City (Actions 1.1A – 1.1D, 1.3A -1.3E, and 1.5A – 1.5D). Actions include fully implementing the 2022 Complete Streets Master Plan, developing, and implementing a new Parking Management Plan, pilot shared bike and escooter programs, and expanding transit service and connectivity to transit stops and others referenced above. These CAP Update foundational actions would be consistent with and promote the General Plan and Complete Streets Master Plan. Implementation of some of these measures and foundational actions may require future infrastructure development or improvements, such as bike paths, solar panels, or building energy efficiency retrofits. However, discretionary development would be subject to review by the City for compliance with the General Plan and Municipal Code and be required to comply with applicable local, State, and federal regulations. Therefore, the CAP Update would result in no impact related to consistency with plans addressing the transportation circulation system or CEQA Guidelines Section 15-64.3, Subdivision (b). No impact would result.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The Los Altos CAAP is a guidance document and does not propose development or changes to land use and zoning. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not result in construction or operational impacts related to risks associated with transportation design or features. However, the proposed CAP Update measures and supporting foundational action included in the CAP Update promotes alternative modes of transportation and reduction in the amount of vehicle miles traveled through the City. For example, the CAP Update promotes developing a new Parking Management Strategy that supports strategic VMT reduction (1.1 C). The CAAP does not include measures that would substantially increase transportation hazards due to a design feature or incompatible land uses. Furthermore, future site-specific discretionary projects would ATTACHMENT 3
462
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
34 be subject to subsequent CEQA review wherein site-specific impacts related to hazards or emergency access would be addressed accordingly. Thus, the CAP Update would result in a lessthan-significant impact related to transportation hazards. d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
The CAP Update is a policy document containing programs that are consistent with the City General Plan and would not facilitate development beyond that allowed under the General Plan.
As such, it would not directly create transportation hazards or result in inadequate emergency access. However, the proposed CAP Update measures and supporting foundational actions promote alternative modes of transportation and reduction in the amount of vehicle miles traveled throughout the City. For example, the CAP promotes implementation of the Complete Streets Master Plan to enhance bicycle, pedestrian, and transit connectivity which would provide adequate emergency access. Future, site-specific impacts related to emergency access would be addressed accordingly. Thus, the CAP Update would result in a less-than-significant impact related to emergency access.
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically ATTACHMENT 3
463
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
35 defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe? The CAP Update would not involve land use or zoning changes. Rather, the CAP Update would promote infrastructure development and redevelopment that is already accounted for in the General Plan and is assessed in the General Plan EIR. As a policy document, the CAP Update would not directly require ground disturbing activities. However, implementation of the CAP Update foundational actions and measures may promote infrastructure development and redevelopment. No impact would result.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably forseeable future development during
normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒ a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? ATTACHMENT 3
464
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
36 Implementation of the proposed CAAP would not introduce uses that would create wastewater effluent or increase stormwater runoff. The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant, which serves the community of Los Altos, has existing remaining capacity allocated for the city to handle projected average dry weather flows for existing conditions and future growth anticipated in the Los Altos General Plan. The proposed CAAP does not propose any new development and is consistent with population and housing growth anticipated in the General Plan and would not directly result in any additional housing or nonresidential development requiring wastewater treatment. No impact would result.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably forseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? The CAP Update is a guidance document and does not propose development or changes to land use or zoning. The CAP Update includes measures that are aimed at decreasing excess waste including increasing the landfill diversion rate (3.1A); reducing waste from demolition, construction, and building materials (3.1B); and adopting a zero-waste policy for City facilities and City-sponsored events (4.5A). Because the CAP Update is a policy document that would not facilitate growth beyond that anticipated by the General Plan, it would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards. Therefore, the CAP Update would result in increases related to solid waste. No impact would result.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Refer to (d) above. No impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
465
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
37 XX. WILDFIRE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evaluation plan? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evaluation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? According to California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFIRE), the City of Los Altos is not located in a designated California Fire Hazard Severity Zone7 or in a State Responsibility Area. High fire hazard rates closely surround the City of Los Altos in the nearby jurisdictions of Portola Valley and Woodside.
The CAP Update is a guidance document and does not propose development or changes to land use and zoning. Thus, implementation of the CAAP would not result in construction or operational impacts related to wildfire. Additionally, the CAAP is a policy-level document that does not propose new habitable development that could be at risk from wildfire, nor does it grant entitlements for development that would have the potential to directly cause wildfire. Rather, the 7 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFIRE). Local Responsibility Area. Available at:
https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/
ATTACHMENT 3
466
Agenda Item # 9.
LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY FEBRUARY 2022
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1
38 CAP Update would aim to reduce natural gas infrastructure that poses wildfire risk if damaged during seismic events and to underground new or restructured electric power lines that pose wildfire risk if damaged during high-wind events. No impact would result.
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
☐ ☐ ☐ ☒
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
The CAAP is a proactive plan that enables the City to reduce overall impact with both GHG and VMT reduction strategies that align with existing Los Altos General Plan policies. Measures in the document would improve, rather than degrade, the quality of the environment and the quality of life for residents in Los Altos. No impact would result. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.)
The proposed CAAP is designed to reduce GHG emissions, which as stated throughout this Initial Study, would result in beneficial impacts toe air quality, GHG emissions, water quality, land use planning, vehicular noise levels, recreation, and vehicle miles traveled. To the extent that ATTACHMENT 3
467
Agenda Item # 9.
FEBRUARY 2022 LOS ALTOS CAP UPDATE INITIAL STUDY
ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT #1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
39 reducing GHG emissions is considered a cumulative (global) benefit and given that many jurisdictions through the Bay Area are preparing similar plans to reduce GHG emissions, the resulting environmental benefits may also be considered cumulative. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Refer to (a) above. No impact would result.
ATTACHMENT 3
468
Agenda Item # 9.
40 IV. LIST OF PREPARERS
City of Los Altos
Bruno Delagneau, Environmental Commission Subcommittee (Vice Chair) Raashina Humayun, Environmental Commission Subcommittee Don Weiden, Environmental Commission Subcommittee
Laura Simpson, City of Los Altos Sustainability Coordinator Urban Planning Partners, Inc.
Curtis Banks, Principal Planner
Sophie Gabel-Scheinbaum, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENT 3
469
Agenda Item # 9.
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
The following is public correspondence received by the City Clerk’s Office after the posting of the original agenda. Individual contact information has been redacted for privacy. This may not be a comprehensive collection of the public correspondence, but staff makes its best effort to include all correspondence received to date.
To send correspondence to the City Council, on matters listed on the agenda please email [email protected]
470
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Julianna Chang
To: Public Comment
Subject: Climate Change Mitigation Should Be a Priority Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 8:53:16 PM
Dear Los Altos City Council,
With flood-inducing sea-level rise in Silicon Valley coming in as early as 2050, it is clear to me that legislative action must be swift, aggressive, and deliberate in our coming years. As such, I recommend that we look to take set strong climate policy as a priority item for this calendar year.
With IPCC and COP reports strongly highlighting the danger of methane usage, it is time that we walk away from gas in our community. At least beginning the change will bring us ever-closer to the solution. Encouraging community-wide electrification is going to take a strong cut into our natural gas usage and push Los Altos residents to understand that, in a hyper-industrialized town, our individual carbon emissions must be carefully considered, assessed, and diminished as soon as possible. The baselines we set with electrification can then, hopefully, push residents into more EV usage as we prepare our city with more charging stations.
It’s not hard for me, as a student, to see the effect of climate change. As a manager of my school’s leading publication, I have helped students cover stories of family displacement due to wildfires or the socioeconomic disparity with which climate change impacts our communities. Yet, seeing city councils across the Bay Area remain lethargic has kept me discouraged that the youth voice (and plea) would be heard. That said, CAAP has always been promising—a piece of legislation that sets standards that will set policies in-place for my future.
Continue to push the envelope with energy policy in CAAP through robust electrification policy.
Sincerely,
Julianna Chang
471
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Saman de Silva
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public Comment for Priority Setting Meeting
Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 3:41:31 PM
Dear Council Members,
My name is Saman de Silva; I am a senior at Henry M. Gunn High School and a resident of Los Altos Hills. I write to implore that you take adequate measures to prioritize policies in climate change mitigation for this year.
As one who is plugged into the enviro-political sphere of Palo Alto, I have, firsthand, seen the roadblocks of successfully drafting and enacting a climate action plan of any sort. The bureaucratic process, real estate lobby, and other miscellaneous factors have halted Palo Alto from achieving its goals in a timely manner. I urge that we, in Los Altos, continue to strongly pursue climate and join the ranks of such climate progressives as Ithaca, Half Moon Bay, and others.
Specific to Palo Alto, though likely applicable in Los Altos, electrification—and building decarbonization as a whole—is slow to gain attention in our community. Getting our community primed for sustainable changes will make the CAAP successful and impactful, and I advise that we prioritize community engagement through CAAP a priority as we develop more-robust energy and transportation policy.
To avoid the more-drastic complications of what climate change may portend for my generation and beyond, taking adequate steps to be ahead of the innovative curve is going to bring Los Altos into sustainable modernity. We are already seeing the effects of the climate crisis, and any step that Los Altos takes will be another step towards convincing us, as youth, that you care about our livelihoods beyond what is simple and easy.
Please set a strong priority in favor of strong energy and transportation policy in the CAAP.
Sincerely,
Saman de Silva
472
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Cindy Sidaris
To: Public Comment; Cindy Sidaris
Subject: Public Comment - Agenda Item #9 - March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 10:22:27 AM
Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Council Members,
I urge you to approve the 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan as recommended by City staff (Agenda Item 9).
Staff and consultants have proposed resolutions to 20 questions and comments raised by the City Council in the November 4, 2021, City Council meeting. Your questions and concerns certainly appear to be fully addressed.
According to US News and World Report, "Deadly with extreme weather now, climate change is about to get so much worse. It is likely going to make the world sicker, hungrier, poorer, gloomier and way more dangerous in the next 18 years with an “unavoidable” increase in risks, a new United Nations science report says." USNews 2-28-22 UN Climate Report
It is now time to approve the CAAP and quickly move forward to enact and implement specific, concrete, and substantive actions to reduce our City's contributions to climate change in all of the areas noted (transportation, energy, resource conservation, green community, and municipal operations), not just the easy or performative actions.
Cindy Sidaris
Los Altos resident
473
Agenda Item # 9.
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
The following is public correspondence received by the City Clerk’s Office after the posting of the original agenda. Individual contact information has been redacted for privacy. This may not be a comprehensive collection of the public correspondence, but staff makes its best effort to include all correspondence received to date.
To send correspondence to the City Council, on matters listed on the agenda please email [email protected]
474
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Couture, Terri
To: Public Comment
Subject: Public comment - City Council meeting March 8 Agenda Item 9 Date: Saturday, March 5, 2022 5:29:10 PM
From Terri Couture as a private citizen and not a member of the art commission Dear City Council members
If you approve this plan, you are merely not contributing to less than .01% improvement to the world's climate change. Meanwhile, Russia, Japan and China between them, will build over 200 coal burning electric plants in 2021 and finish in 2022. Those countries and many others are the big contributors. You are merely impacting the freedoms of the people who voted for you.
Thank you
*Wire Fraud is Real*. Before wiring any money, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions. Additionally, please note that the sender does not have authority to bind a party to a real estate contract via written or verbal communication. 475
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Roberta Phillips
To: City Council; Public Comment
Subject: Council Meeting March 8/ 2022 Item #9 CAAP
Date: Sunday, March 6, 2022 3:45:24 PM
Dear Council Members
When I was in graduate school I substitute taught for my local school district. I was called every day because the policy at the time did not allow teachers to roll over their sick or vacation time to the next year. As a result, all the teachers took all their time.The district decided to change their policy and allow teacher discretion.The new policy said they were going to treat teachers as adults. If they were sick,needed to go to an attorney or have a personal day, they could take as much time off as they needed.
As a result the school district cut in half the millions of dollars they were spending on substitute teachers..
I ask for the same from the City Council when it comes to policy regarding a climate action plan.Residents and homeowners should be treated like adults and voluntarily do as much as they can to conserve electricity, water and miles traveled in their cars.I know that everyone will step up.
The CAAP states "Based on these estimates, a total of approximately $14,981,000 will be needed to implement all mitigation actions"
It is better to call on the good in people, than legislate forced actions, thinking throwing tens of millions of dollars at the problem will work.
It is good to be aspirational and inspirational, but naive to believe that more will be achieved with a stick rather than a carrot.
John Adams, the American Revolutionary War patriot and second president of the United States, wrote in a letter dated 13 February 1818: "The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in the religious sentiments of their duties and obligations…. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution" If you want a climate change revolution you must appeal to the minds and hearts of your community , as expressed by Adams.
Sincerely
Roberta Phillips.
476
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Freddie Park
To: Roberta Phillips
Cc: City Council; Public Comment
Subject: Re: Council Meeting March 8/ 2022 Item #9 CAAP Date: Sunday, March 6, 2022 4:39:19 PM
Another great letter! You are on a roll!!!
Freddie Park Wheeler
On Mar 6, 2022, at 3:44 PM, Roberta Phillips >
wrote:
Dear Council Members
When I was in graduate school I substitute taught for my local school district. I was called every day because the policy at the time did not allow teachers to roll over their sick or vacation time to the next year. As a result, all the teachers took all their time.The district decided to change their policy and allow teacher discretion.The new policy said they were going to treat teachers as adults. If they were sick,needed to go to an attorney or have a personal day, they could take as much time off as they needed.
As a result the school district cut in half the millions of dollars they were spending on substitute teachers..
I ask for the same from the City Council when it comes to policy regarding a climate action plan.Residents and homeowners should be treated like adults and voluntarily do as much as they can to conserve electricity, water and miles traveled in their cars.I know that everyone will step up.
The CAAP states "Based on these estimates, a total of approximately $14,981,000 will be needed to implement all mitigation actions"
It is better to call on the good in people, than legislate forced actions, thinking throwing tens of millions of dollars at the problem will work.
It is good to be aspirational and inspirational, but naive to believe that more will be achieved with a stick rather than a carrot.
John Adams, the American Revolutionary War patriot and second president of the United States, wrote in a letter dated 13 February 1818: "The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in the religious sentiments of their duties and obligations….
This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution"
If you want a climate change revolution you must appeal to the minds and hearts of your community , as expressed by Adams.
Sincerely
Roberta Phillips.
477
Agenda Item # 9.
478
Agenda Item # 9.
From: John Corrigan
To: Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT AGENDA ITEM 9 - MARCH 8, 2022
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 8:19:26 AM
Dear Los Altos City Council Members,
I would like to raise a concern as a Los Altos resident, and not in my capacity as a Los Altos Parks and Recreation Commissioner.
I respectfully request that the City Council de-prioritize and minimize investment in the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), contrary to its position stated in the packet accompanying Agenda Item 9: “The City Council and Environmental Commission prioritized the Climate Crisis and agreed that this is a priority….”1 The elephant in the room for the CAAP is that, even if Los Altos were to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to zero, our efforts would have no impact. “...under current trends, every 10 percent reduction that the developed world makes in its emissions (a reduction it has barely managed in fifteen years) will offset less than four years of growth in the developing world.”2 Since the developed world can’t offset GHG emissions growth in the developing world, Los Altos can’t - particularly because Los Altos accounts for only ~
0.0003% of global GHG emissions. 3, 4, 5 Los Altos would require ~ 1,000 years of zero emissions to offset the volume of global GHG emissions generated in a single day.
Nevertheless, the CAAP proposes a Carbon Emission Permit of $50 - $200/year per household.6 Assuming 10K households, Los Altos residents will pay $500K - $2M per year in Carbon Emission Permit taxes. Additionally, the cost of the CAAP proposals itemized in the Mitigation, Cross-Cutting, and Adaptation Budgets is at least $15M.7 Raising taxes to reduce emissions may be a well-meaning proposal, but it is extremely costly and manifestly unproductive since achieving no emissions in Los Altos will have no impact on global emissions.
Residents and businesses are free to take actions of their choice with respect to climate 479
Agenda Item # 9.
change. But the city shouldn’t make emissions reduction a strategic goal or priority if its actions can only have a maximum potential impact of 0.0003% on global emissions. As a policy matter, therefore, the Los Altos City Council should ensure that the CAAP achieves the minimum GHG emissions reduction targets required by state and federal law to minimize associated burdens on residents, businesses, the budget, and staff.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Best regards,
John Corrigan
1 March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda Item 9, p. 4. (p. 256 of the pdf) 2 Koonin, Steven E. “Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters.” Ed. Alexa Stevenson. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books, Inc., 2021. 281. 3 Los Altos produced 111,320 MTCO2e in 2018. (March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda Item 9, p. 6. (p. 271 of the pdf))
4 The U.S. produced 5,216 million MTCO2e in 2020. (“Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks,” Environmental Protection Agency.) 5 The U.S. accounts "...for only some 13% of global greenhouse gas.” (Koonin, Steven E. “Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters.” Ed. Alexa Stevenson. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books, Inc., 2021. 300.) 6 March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda Packet Agenda Item 9, p. 6. (p. 258 of the pdf)
7 March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting Agenda Packet Agenda Item 9, pp. 80 - 83. (pp. 345 - 348 of the pdf)
480
Agenda Item # 9.
From: Pat Marriot
To: Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #9 - MARCH 1, 2022 CAAP
Date: Monday, March 7, 2022 11:16:33 AM
Council Members:
When we built our home in Los Altos, we achieved 181 green points when only 70 were required. We have since added solar panels and backup batteries.
I’ve been driving an EV (Nissan LEAF) since 2013.
We are concerned about climate change and support many environmental organizations.
That said, some of the CAAP proposals are over the top, e.g., -Charging residents for a Carbon Emission Permit. Ever drop wears away a stone. While $50 - $200/year is not a huge amount of money, you will soon be adding some sort of tax for a public safety building + bond financing.
-“4-5 FTE for mitigation actions” is not affordable, given our current financial situation.
Staff and residents can easily be educated about “green” behavior. County, state and Fed governments; PGE; water companies -- all provide recommendations about how to protect the environment, save water, save energy, recycle, avoid plastic pollution, etc. etc. We do not need a staff and a big budget at City Hall to make us more responsible.
Serious efforts that will make a significant difference are worthwhile. Virtue signaling is not.
Thanks,
Pat Marriott
481
Agenda Item # 9.
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Reviewed By:
City Manager City Attorney
GE
Finance Director
JH JF
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: To advise the Council and the public of the Police Facility Subcommittee’s work to date.
Prepared by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment(s):
None
Initiated by:
City Council
Previous Council Consideration:
February 22, 2022
Fiscal Impact:
If approved, up to $200,000 will be allocated from the City’s General Fund, and a budget adjustment of $200,000 will be included in the current Fiscal Year budget.
The $200,000 would be used to engage with a Municipal Advisor (final fee is contingent on successful ballot measure), Bond Counsel (final fee is contingent on successful ballot measure), Ballot Measure Consultant, and a Polling Company.
Environmental Review:
N/A
Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:
Does the City Council agree that a special tax for the construction of a new police station or a general tax for the construction of a new police station, repairs to both fire stations, improvements and repairs to various city parks, and enhancements or additions to the library, in addition to maintenance, repair, renewal, or replacement of other city facilities is warranted? If the answer to this policy question is yes, then:
• Does the City Council wish to proceed with a revenue measure for a police station only or for multiple City Facilities?
• Does the City Council wish to move forward with a revenue measure this election or at a future election?
• What type of revenue measure(s) would the City Council like to consider? • What other types of provisions would Council like to include in a revenue measure? 482
Agenda Item # 10.
Subject: Title
Date Page 2
Summary:
The City Council considered the report from the Police Facility Subcommittee at the February 22, 2022 study session. The City Council provided direction, however, prior to the direction being implemented Staff will need additional policy questions answered.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends the City Council discuss and provide direction. 483
Agenda Item # 10.
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ALLOCATE FROM THE GENERAL FUND AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A MUNICIPAL
ADVISOR, BALLOT MEASURE CONSULTANT, AND A POLLING COMPANY AND AMENDING THE FY22 OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, City Council authorized increasing the current FY 2022 Operating Budget by $200,000 to be appropriated from the General Fund for use to appoint a Municipal Advisor, A Ballot Measure Consultant and a Polling Agent to explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Los Altos, California, does resolve as follows:
1. The City Manager is authorized to execute an amendment to the Operating Budget to increase appropriations in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for use to appoint a Municipal Advisor, A Ballot Measure Consultant and a Polling Agent to explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos.
2. The City Manager is also authorized to take such further actions as may be necessary to amend the Operating Budget.
3. The FY22 General Fund operating budget shall be amended such that the FY22 appropriation in the Operating Budget is increased by $200,000 for use to appoint a Municipal Advisor, A Ballot Measure Consultant and a Polling Agent o explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Los Altos hereby authorizes the City Manager to amend the General Fund appropriations by an amount not to exceed $200,000 and amend the Operating budget to reflect this increased expenditure.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Los Altos at a meeting thereof on the 8th day of March 2022 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
, MAYOR
Attest:
484
Agenda Item # 10.
ATTACHMENT 1
_______________________________
, CITY CLERK
485
Agenda Item # 10.
CITY OF LOS ALTOS
City Council Study Session
Tuesday, February 22, 2022
5:00 pm
Questions & Answers
What period would we be looking at? 20 year, 30 year, 40 year for tax? The duration of the tax is at Council’s discretion and also dependent on the tax collection mechanism. For example, a G.O. bond property tax can only be collected for the duration of the G.O. bond payments. Other tax collection mechanisms like parcel taxes, sales taxes, etc., may be collected for a specified term or indefinitely.
One option is for the term of the proposed tax to match the term of the proposed bond financing (e.g. 30-year tax revenue supporting 30 years of bond payments).
Another option would be to have the tax continue without a specified term. Communities may opt for longer collection periods to: (1) fund continued municipal services (e.g. public safety) supported by the tax into the future; or (2) pay for future capital improvements or maintenance costs related to projects supported by the tax.
If we were going to go forward, would we want to have an advisory measure if we were doing a parcel or property tax that was not tied to a specific project? Would we still want to have an advisory measure on how the funds would be spent?
If the tax measure is structured as a “general tax” (meaning the tax can be used for any lawful general purpose at the discretion of the local governing body), the associated ballot language cannot indicate a specified purpose or use for the taxes to be raised. The City has the option to include an accompanying advisory measure to gauge voter opinion on how funds should be spent. The requirement for a general tax, that is not a property or parcel tax, is simple majority (50% + 1).
You asked for $200,000, but later on the report, you said it might cost $200-300,000- do you have a breakdown of all the various costs, such as for the consultants and bond counsels? The City will need to retain a group of professionals (consultants, attorneys, polling company) to assist in putting the ballot measure together. The team of professionals will help the City evaluate its tax measure options including the approach, timing, tax amount and assist with the public education program. They would work with a polling company to develop a community survey, solicit feedback from constituents, and report back findings/recommendations. They would also help craft the specific ballot language that would be brought forth to Council to approve the measure to be placed on a future election ballot.
486
Agenda Item # 10.
The estimated cost to qualify a tax measure for the ballot is $150,000. These are non-contingent costs meaning that they would need to be paid by the City regardless of the outcome of the tax measure.
Staff is requesting up to $200,000 this year, knowing that some costs like the fee to place a tax measure on the ballot, would be included in next year’s budget, but some of the work to place the measure on the ballot will begin this fiscal year.
Ballot Measure Qualification
Estimated Cost Budget
Professional Estimated Cost
Ballot Measure Consulting $85,000
Polling Company $35,000
Bond Attorney $10,000
Financial Advisor $15,000
Bond Underwriter $0(1)
Contingency $5,000
$150,000
(1)Stifel will charge 2.25% of the amount of bonds issued for services related to development of the tax measure, analysis to the City to determine the appropriate tax structure, developing materials for a public education effort and being available for all public meetings. If the City pursues a bond financing as a result of a successful ballot measure, Stifel will also cover the costs associated with structuring, marketing and selling any future bonds. Their fee will be 100% contingent on the successful passage of the tax measure and the sale of any bonds. Their fee will be paid from bond proceeds.
After the tax measure is qualified for the ballot, the City is prohibited from spending any of its public City funds toward any advocacy efforts for the ballot measure.
If the tax measure is successful, the City would move forward with issuing bonds with a team of bond professionals which would include many of the parties that would be part of the ballot qualification process. The total budget for those fees would be about 3-3.5% of the amount of bonds to be sold.
For a hypothetical $40 million bond, the estimated fees would be about $1.2 - $1.4 million. These fees (except those related to a bond credit rating fee of about $45,000) would be 100% contingent on the successful sale of the bonds and would be paid from bond proceeds.
Why are lease revenue bonds needed for sales tax or parcel bond measures? Unlike a G.O. Bond (property tax) measure, a sales or parcel tax measure does not expressly approve the issuance of bonds. In order to leverage revenues from a voter-approved sales or parcel tax measure, most local agencies issue lease revenue bonds. Lease revenue bonds, which 487
Agenda Item # 10.
are a very common bond financing method in California, are not subject to the State’s constitutional debt limit and therefore, do not require voter approval. Any lease revenue bond issuance would be required to be approved by the City Council.
We already have a library utilized as an asset, would we use our community center as an asset? Any unencumbered City-owned property may be utilized so long as the value of the asset exceeds the amount borrowed and resulting annual debt payments do not exceed the annual ‘fair rental value’ for the asset. The City could use other properties it owns or it could use the facility to be financed with the bonds as the leased asset.
When are you planning to do public outreach? I’m not sure what we’re hoping to gather.
According to the current schedule (attached to the staff report), public outreach will be conducted between April and July 2022. During that time, City staff and its team of professionals will gauge public support for a particular bond or tax measure via public meetings and a community polling survey to be conducted by a third-party polling company.
Is the subcommittee recommending a general public facility measure or a special measure solely for the police facility?
The subcommittee recommended a general tax for City facilities in the form of a property or parcel tax. However, after a discussion with Council members, the recommendation is to allow the Subcommittee to continue their work, and poll public opinion on a UUT measure for City facilities at this year’s election, or a property tax at the 2023 or 2024 election.
Are you anticipating it will only take one month to come up with a design to present to the public for community outreach?
Should Council proceed with a “general tax”, the recommendation would be to hold the election in November 2022 and provide the public with needs assessment for the police station, both fire stations, park facilities and access, and potential enhancements to the library.
Should Council proceed with a “special tax”, the recommendation would be to hold the election in 2023 and 2024 to allow time for a specific design for a police station only.
Has any outreach been conducted with the public safety group and has their input been taken? Yes. The design team initiated outreach to PD staff on February 8th and is doing a site visit March 3rd.
If we were to go with the G.O. bond, and we did not do the advisory piece of it where we identify the different facilities, and it passes, how and who would determine the use? Could you explain the process if it is a general public facility that is passed? 488
Agenda Item # 10.
Since a G.O. Bond measure is a “special tax” that includes specific language on the use of revenues and bond proceeds, an advisory measure would not be necessary. If the City pursues a “general tax”, it can include an advisory measure to gauge voter opinion on how funds should be spent, as previously noted.
Would we generate the necessary revenue with the property tax vs. the sales tax? With an ad valorem property tax, the City can adjust property tax rates without limitation to generate the necessary annual revenue. With respect to sales tax, even if the City increases its sales tax (currently at 9.125%) by 1.125% to the maximum amount allowed in California (10.25%), it would not generate the necessary annual revenue to support the amount of infrastructure projects the City is seeking to fund. Currently, it is estimated that an annual revenue increase of approximately $3 million/year would be necessary and a 1.125% sales tax would raise approximately $2 million/year.
Please note that if the City were to increase its sales tax to 10.25%, it would be at the State maximum and cause Los Altos to have one of the highest sales tax rates in the State of California and the highest in Santa Clara County. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that a ballot measure for a sales tax increase of more than 1% is very uncommon. The most common sales tax increases are 0.25% or 0.50%, which would generate an estimated $500,000 and $1,000,000, respectively.
Where does “carving out” citizens with modest needs come into the process? Any exemptions (e.g. senior, income) could be included in the ballot measure language, as noted in the presentation.
Are there other funding sources, like federal infrastructure grants, that we can use to subsidize or fund this project?
Over the past couple of years, the federal government has provided funding to local communities in the form of stimulus funds to help residents, businesses and government mitigate the negative fiscal effects stemming from the public health emergency (Coronavirus pandemic).
From time to time, the federal government offers grant programs to help finance local or regional infrastructure such as freeways, interchanges, utilities, airports and other large scale projects.
City staff is constantly working with its federal and state agency partners to learn about these grant opportunities and to aggressively apply and lobby for these funds.
At this time, the City is not aware of any federal or state grant funds that would support local infrastructure (such as public safety buildings, parks, local streets, etc.). City staff will continue to work on securing outside grant funding and any funds obtained would be used to downsize the amount of debt it issues.
489
Agenda Item # 10.
Los Altos does not have a good history of passing bond measures, so polling should be done before expending resources. What is the timeline of the political consultants, bond counsel, investment bankers, and others?
Public outreach and polling by a ballot measure consultant and polling company, respectively, would be conducted from April to July 2022, based on the current schedule. As previously mentioned, during that time, staff and the City’s consultants will gauge voter support (e.g. community polling) for a particular bond or tax measure. Based on the results of the outreach, Council will make a determination to place a measure on the November 2022 or a future ballot.
What exactly does Stifel do and how many other parcel/sales tax measures have you been involved with? How successful have you been in the past and how many measures have been put on?
Stifel is the leading underwriter of municipal bonds both nationwide and in California. As part of their engagements, Stifel regularly assists clients with pre-election measure strategy and planning. Over the past two years(since 2020) in California, Stifel has served as bond underwriter on 436 bond issues totaling $12.7 billion. During this same time, Stifel’s municipal clients have successfully passed 41 tax measures, which include G.O. Bond, sales tax, UUT, parcel, and hotel tax measures.
We can’t run a campaign for the ballot measure, so can a separate entity run a campaign for it?
If Council decides to place a measure on the ballot, a separate committee (e.g. nonprofit) can be established to raise funds and organize volunteers to support the measure. For example, in the neighboring city of Campbell, ‘Campbell Residents for Measure O’ was set up to support the passage of Measure O (police and library facility improvements).
Should we have a rough estimate of the sales tax?
As previously mentioned, if the City increases its sales tax (currently at 9.125%) to the maximum amount allowed in California (10.25%), the remaining capacity (1.125%) would generate an estimated $2.0 million per year.
490
Agenda Item # 10.
Date Action
March 8, 2022 Council Meeting to Discuss Ballot Measure Options and Provide Staff Direction
March 2022 Engage Team of Professionals
Develop Community Polling Survey
Apr-Jul 2022 Community Engagement/Public Outreach
- Community Workshops/Public Education
- Conduct Community Polling Survey
- Present Community Polling Results at City Council Meeting - Prepare Impartial Analysis
July 12, 2022 Council Resolution to Place Measure on Ballot August 12, 2022 Ballot Submission Deadline (for Nov 2022 Election Ballot) - Ballot Measure Text (75 Word Limit)
- Resolution
- Ordinance
- Tax Rate Statement (if Applicable)
Aug-Nov 2022 Advocacy Campaign
Any advocacy activities related to the ballot measure such as direct mailing, social media engagement and direct community engagement activities cannot be undertaken by the City Council or City staff. Public funds are prohibited from being used for these activities as well.
November 8, 2022 Ballot Measure Election Day
Post-Nov 8 2022 Prepare Bond Financing
December 2022 Certification of Election Results
Pursue Bond Credit Rating
January 2023 City Council Approval of Bond Financing
February 2023 Issue Bonds
Summer 2023 Begin Construction
491
Agenda Item # 10.
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
The following is public correspondence received by the City Clerk’s Office after the posting of the original agenda. Individual contact information has been redacted for privacy. This may not be a comprehensive collection of the public correspondence, but staff makes its best effort to include all correspondence received to date.
To send correspondence to the City Council, on matters listed on the agenda please email [email protected]
492
Agenda Item # 10.
From: Pat Marriot
To: Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT Item #10 March 8, 2022
Date: Friday, March 4, 2022 2:15:28 PM
Attachments: 10-7-15 daily post guest opinion measure A.pdf Council Members:
I am strongly in favor of a new police station.
As you put together a financial plan, please recall Measure A back in 2015. The Town Crier reported “Measure A crushed in election.” Over 71% of voters rejected the $65M bond.
I was on the team of residents that crushed the measure – for many good reasons. (See attached guest opinion.) We collected about $8,500 in donations for our campaign for lawn signs, ads and flyers mailed to every household.
The city spent over $1M on consultants and expenses:
MEASURE
A COSTS 2015
2008-2009 Anderson Brulé Architects: $575,861
Godbe Research: $73,475
Northcross Hill, financial stratEgies $28,333
David J. Power, environmental $107,388
TBWB, public information campaign $39,152
Tramutola LLC, political consultant: $82,335
Consultant total $906,543
PRINTPRO PRINT, FOLD & STUFF 7/6/LS mailer $4,977
PRINTPRO PRINT, FOLD & STUFF 7/61L5 mailer $435
PRINTPRO POSTAGE 7/6/L5 mailer $4,235
Mailer total $9,647
REGISTRAR OF VOTERS CONSOLIDATE UD $182,800
TOTAL $1,098,990
Godbe Research told Council there was 67.6% support for a bond measure rate of $8 per $100,000 of assessed property value, which would equate to approximately $20 million in public funding. Council decided to go for $65M.
If you want to finally get a new police station for Los Altos – as I do! – please learn from the past.
- Use terminology everyone understands. If “public safety building” is the preferred designation, describe exactly what it will include. Provide clear, precise information 493
Agenda Item # 10.
about what residents will get for their money.
-Define the obvious problems we have to solve: our police station is X years old, lacks functioning heat and A/C, the basement floods, … Pictures are worth a thousand words.
-
Don’t add unnecessary frills. Remember when the new community center was going to be built for $25M? Then, on September 26, 2017, the mayor said words to this effect: “Are we making a big mistake by skimping at this point? We picked $25M out of a hat. Could have picked $30M. This project is overdue by 15 or 20 years. Imagine spending $25M 10 years ago. Or 2 years ago. Should we increase the budget? In 10 years everything will be more expensive. I understand the financial statements. We have structural surplus of $3 - $4M/year. $5M is year and a half cash flow. $5M or $10M more, wouldn’t that be smart thing? No borrowing.” -Avoid mission creep. Do NOT add a library, City Hall upgrades or any other building maintenance to this plan or you will surely doom it.
Sincerely,
Pat Marriott
494
Agenda Item # 10.
8 Daily Post Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Opinion
NO ON MEASURE A: $160 MILLION TOO MUCH FOR A “CONCEPT”
There’s no doubt Los Altos needs a new community center. But without a plan, we don’t know whether we’ll get the Taj Mahal or the Titanic.
TOO EXPENSIVE
A $65 million bond is just the tip of the iceberg. Fees and interest add $69 million. Plus $25 million from city reserves for parking—in spite of the budget noting “many competing demands for limited resources.” Add to that over $900,000 already spent on consultant fees.
The $160 million total does not include furniture, equipment, moving expenses, temporary facilities during construction, operating costs or maintenance. Quoting the city finance committee: “Such expenses, potentially amounting to several million dollars, could not be paid for out of bond proceeds and would have to be met out of existing city resources.” We’ll pay for every class, every meeting, every swim at a rate that can cover these expenses.
Meanwhile, our up-front “investment” would continue for 30 years, the amount depending on our home’s assessed value. For tax year 2018/2019, a home assessed at $1 million would pay $331. And that’s only an estimate. Property tax varies with assessed value and bond interest.
Seniors are not exempt.
TOO BIG
City documents describe “a framework for the proposed project” and say “once funding is secured … the design phase can be initiated.”
In fact, we won’t have a design—or actual construction costs—until the city spends $10 million to “underwrite design and engineering.”
Even with the most meticulous plans, government projects are prone to exceed estimates, yet we’re asked to invest in a “conceptual design” – and a rather grandiose one:
55,600 square feet—3 times larger than existing structures—built out for classes and rental, reducing green space and recreation parkland.
A 38,500-square-foot, 3-pool aquatic center. The city council “will make a decision about the method of managing pool operations after funding is secured to construct the project.”
It’s inconceivable that we’re asked to fund a pool complex—or anything else—without a business plan to assure us that these facilities can be self-supporting.
WRONG PRIORITIES
495
Agenda Item # 10.
We’re told this is a “scaled down” plan. But the price tag has gone up while important facilities have been cut.
A financial commission report says, “The 2009 Master Plan called for multiple phases of development, the first of which would include a new police station, city hall and community center, at a total estimated cost of $81 million. Athletic fields, a library and a theater were to be included in later phases with a swim pool to be funded entirely by outside community groups.” Six years later, the asking price is $90 million—just for a community center, with pools now financed entirely by taxpayers. There’s no plan for funding facilities that dropped off the list.
Will these buildings continue to deteriorate while we construct an extravagant community center? Or are there additional bonds on the horizon?
While the city spends $25 million on parking—at $80,000/underground space—the budget shows $16.8 million in unfunded projects including parks, traffic calming and pedestrian/bicycle safety.
NO PLAN, NO ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY NEEDS
After years of costly surveys, studies and “charrettes,” the city still has no clear understanding of how the community center will be used, how much it will cost to operate, how it will integrate with other parks and facilities or how it will connect to downtown.
Only in the last few weeks has the city finally taken notice of senior residents’ wishes for dedicated space. A council member (stating personal views) said, “One area of legitimate need for more specificity: How do we intend to respond to the needs of seniors? The conceptual design was based, erroneously in my opinion, on the ‘multigenerational’ model.” Council is now scrambling to respond to a senior commission request for a 10,000-square-foot “Senior Wing,” so as not to lose the senior vote. But the fact remains that the bond represents a “conceptual design” without specifics and without commitments.
Moreover, the city is planning a “visioning process” for downtown—again with high-priced consultants—which would not include any city facilities. This piecemeal planning is not in our best financial or strategic interests.
We deserve a fiscally-responsible plan for a right-sized, revitalized community center that accommodates all our community needs. Measure A is not that plan.
Get more facts at WWW.LOSALTOSNEIGHBORS.COM
Pat Marriott is a member of the Los Altos ad hoc downtown buildings committee. This column represents her personal views.
496
Agenda Item # 10.
From: Couture, Terri
To: Public Comment
Subject: [External Sender]City council meeting March 8 agenda #10 Date: Saturday, March 5, 2022 5:40:44 PM
The agenda item you are voting on is NOT specific, as the language states to fund "facilities improvement'. This bond will fail without very specific descriptions, plans and declarations.
The country and our local economy are very fragile, and inflation is impacting every single person.
The only tax that should be considered is a sales tax. There is a better chance this can pass than any other tax. Far too many of our Los Altans are struggling with the many economic disasters and a bleak looking 2022. The parcel and utility taxes will penalize Los Altans, while a sales tax can broaden the base who pays. Other municipalities have a sales tax. Do not exempt certain groups, as that alienates the populace.
NOW is the time to bring Los Altans together.
From Terri Couture (as a private citizen and not a member of the art committee) and Fred Tuerk
*Wire Fraud is Real*. Before wiring any money, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions. Additionally, please note that the sender does not have authority to bind a party to a real estate contract via written or verbal communication. 497
Agenda Item # 10.
From: Roberta Phillips
To: City Council; Public Comment
Subject: [External Sender]City Council March 8, Item #10 Police facility Study Session Public Comment Date: Sunday, March 6, 2022 12:36:59 PM
Dear Council
I would appreciate it if you would consider paying for a professional scientific pole prior to spending $200,000 for bond consultants etc. I do not want to waste the money if the community does not support the measure or will only support an amount that is short of the needed money.
Neysa suggested this approach at the last meeting and I agree.
Also the resolution says:
" AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ALLOCATE PARK IN LIEU FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A
MUNICIPAL ADVISOR, BALLOT MEASURE CONSULTANT, AND A POLLING COMPANY AND AMENDING THE FY22 OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos." This is confusing. Is the bond for a new police department building or is it to fund facility improvements across several facilities ? What facilities ? Also the resolution and report says the money will come from Park-in Lieu fees. I understand that the Park-In-Lieu funds are restricted funds. According to our Ordinance and Municipal codes :
Use of and basis for in-lieu fees. The money collected pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be used only for the purpose of providing park or recreational facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision from which fees are collected. Fees so collected shall be used to purchase land or, if the council deems that there is sufficient land available for the subdivision, for improving such land for park and recreational purposes, buying equipment, or constructing improvements in neighborhood and district park and recreational facilities. The fee so required shall be based on the fair market value of the lands available for park purchase as determined by the provisions of subsection G of this section.
Please follow the rules.
Given our budget challenges please consider only doing the initial polling needed to find out if a property tax, parcel tax, utility tax. or sales tax increase will actually result in a win when it is put to a vote on a ballot.
Sincerely
Roberta Phillips
498
Agenda Item # 10.
From: Pat Marriot
To: Public Comment
Subject: [External Sender]RE: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #10 March 8, 2022 police building bond Date: Sunday, March 6, 2022 11:56:05 AM
Council Members:
Just where will the money come from for the consultant studies? Would the park in lieu funds be transferred to the General Fund?
I’ve had two people call me this morning asking about this, so I’m not the only one who’s confused.
Thanks,
Pat Marriott
Agenda Item 10:
Police Facility Study Session Follow Up: Consider report, discuss and provide direction to staff including adoption of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to allocate park in lieu funds in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for the appointment of a Municipal Advisor, Ballot Measure Consultant, and a Polling Company and amending the Fiscal Year Operating Budget (G. Engeland) Staff Report:
Fiscal Impact:
If approved, up to $200,000 will be allocated from the City’s General Fund, and a budget adjustment of $200,000 will be included in the current Fiscal Year budget.
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ALLOCATE PARK IN LIEU FUNDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF A MUNICIPAL
ADVISOR, BALLOT MEASURE CONSULTANT, AND A POLLING COMPANY AND AMENDING THE FY22 OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City Council to explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos; and WHEREAS, on March 8, 2022, City Council authorized increasing the current FY 2022 Operating Budget by $200,000 to be appropriated from the General Fund for use to appoint a Municipal Advisor, A Ballot Measure Consultant and a Polling Agent o explore the possibility of a bond measure to fund facilities improvement certain designated locations within Los Altos; and … The FY22 General Fund operating budget shall be amended such that the FY22 appropriation in the Operating Budget is increased by $200,000 for
499
Agenda Item # 10.
From: Pat Marriot [mailto
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2022 10:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM #10 March 8, 2022 police building bond Council Members:
Regarding the $200,000 needed for up-front studies, I don’t see how it can be legal to use park in-lieu funds. A police station in no way qualifies as park or recreation facilities.
You will be alienating many residents right at the start of this process if you rob the parks fund. Parks and open space are important to residents of all ages and become even more essential when we consider the RHNA requirements for adding so many more households. We already have less parkland than most cities.
I suggest you look into the CIP budget, which stands at $75,815,837 for 68 projects. Surely you can find $200,000 there.
Thanks,
Pat Marriott
500
Agenda Item # 10.
AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Reviewed By:
City Manager City Attorney
GE
Finance Director
JH JF
4895-8689-3330v1
NON-BC\27916001
Meeting Date: March 8, 2022
Subject: Historic Resource Inventory (HRI): Review and discuss designation process, criteria and application of Historic Review and Historic Resource/Inventory Designation
Prepared by: Steve Golden, Interim Planning Manager
Reviewed by: Laura Simpson, Interim Development Services Director Approved by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment(s):
1. Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) Presentation
Initiated by:
City Council
Previous Council Consideration:
None
Fiscal Impact:
None
Environmental Review:
Not applicable. The purpose of this item is to obtain direction from the City Council, to be formalized in a later Council action, so that the City Council is not committing itself to any policy option at this time. Any final City Council action is anticipated to be exempt pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and/or 15307 (Actions for the Protection of the Environment) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:
How does the City Council desire to address historic resources in connection with housing development projects?
Summary:
The City Council asked staff for a report on the Historic Resource Inventory (HRI), specifically how it is compiled and applied to planning entitlement applications. The presentation is intended to provide an overview of this process. Staff anticipates this topic covering two meetings, the first to provide information on the process and application, and the second to discuss and/or formalize any changes the City Council would like to consider.
501
Agenda Item # 11.
Subject: Historic Resource Inventory (HRI):
March 8, 2022