Agenda packet, first session — Los Altos City Council, March 22, 2022

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA
7:00 PM - Tuesday, March 22, 2022
via Teleconference
Please Note: Per California Executive Order N-29-20, the City Council will meet via Telephone/Video Conference Only.

Telephone: 1-650-242-4929 Meeting ID: 146 486 0475
https://webinar.ringcentral.com/j/1464860475
AMENDED 03.15.2022
TO PARTICIPATE VIA VIDEO: Follow the link above. Members of the public will need to have a working microphone on their device and must have the latest version of Ringcentral installed (available at http://www.ringcentral.com/download.html). To request to speak, please use the “Raise hand” feature located at the bottom of the screen.

TO PARTICPATE VIA TELEPHONE: Members of the public may also participate via telephone by calling the number listed above. To request to speak, press *9 on your telephone.

TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS: Prior to the meeting, comments on matters listed on the agenda may be emailed to [email protected]. Emails sent to this email address are sent to/received immediately by the City Council. Please include a subject line in the following format:

PUBLIC COMMENT AGENDA ITEM ## - MEETING DATE
Correspondence submitted in hard copy/paper must be received by 2:00 PM on the day of the meeting to ensure distribution prior to the meeting. Correspondence received prior to the meeting will be included in the public record. .

Public testimony will be taken at the direction of the Mayor, and members of the public may only comment during times allotted for public comments.

AGENDA

CALL MEETING TO ORDER

ESTABLISH QUORUM

PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION

SPECIAL ITEM
1 3/22/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Page 2 of 3
A. Commission Appointments: Consider Commission applications and make appointments as appropriate (A. Chelemengos)

CHANGES TO THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Members of the audience may bring to the Council's attention any item that is not on the agenda. Speakers are generally given two or three minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor. Please be advised that, by law, the City Council is unable to discuss or take action on issues presented during the Public Comment Period. According to State Law (also known as “The Brown Act”) items must first be noted on the agenda before any discussion or action.

Public Comments Items Not on the Agenda

CONSENT CALENDAR
These items will be considered by one motion unless any member of the Council or audience wishes to remove an item for discussion. Any item removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion will be handled at the discretion of the Mayor.

1. Minutes: Approve Minutes of the March 8, 2022 City Council Meeting (A. Chelemengos)

2. Design Contract Amendment:-Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road, Project CD-01012: Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment on behalf of the City with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers in the amount of $13,665 to provide additional consulting services for for design validation for the Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road Drywells Project and up to 10% contingency funds of the total design cost in the amount of $10,245 for additional construction support, if needed. (A.

Trese)

3. Housing Element Annual Progress Report: Receive Housing Element Annual Progress Report For Calendar Year 2021 and adopt Resolution of the City Council of the City of Los Altos accepting the Housing Element Annual Progress Report for Calendar Year 2021 and authorizing staff to submit the report to the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and The California Department of Housing and Community Development. (L. Simpson) PUBLIC HEARINGS - None

DISCUSSION ITEMS

4. Story Pole Exemption Request PPR21-006: -330 Distel Circle - EAH Housing - The City Council will consider a request for an exemption from the City’s Story Pole policy for a for a 5- story, 64 feet tall, 90-unit, 100% affordable development proposal at 330 Distel Circle and if approved, adopt resolution granting an exception from the City’s story pole policy and making findings of CEQA exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 and/or 15061(b)(3) The applicant has submitted a pre-application for the proposed project.(L. Simpson/ R.

Hayagreev)

5. El Camino Real Bike Lanes: Consider and Adopt Resolution supporting Class IIB - Buffered Bicycle Lane Installation on El Camino Real – City Limits between Adobe Creek and ~500-FT 2 3/22/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Page 3 of 3
South of Rengstorff Avenue as part of Caltrans Street Resurfacing Improvements scheduled for Summer 2023; Approve Removal of Street Parking to Accommodate this Improvement. Lane restriping along El Camino Real for bicycle traffic is exempt from review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) in that it entails minor alterations to existing public facilities involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former uses, it would not create additional automobile lanes, and none of the circumstances described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 would apply. (M.Lee)

6. Housing Element: Receive staff update on the status of the Housing Element Update (2023- 2031) community engagement process, consultant contract, and next steps, and approve the expansion of the role of the Housing Element Council Subcommittee. (Council Initiated)

7. City of Los Altos Compensation Philosophy: Consider proposed Compensation Policy and adopt or provide direction to staff. (I. Silipin)

8. Council Legislative Subcommittee Update And Potential Council Action: Receive update from the City Council Legislative Subcommittee; discuss pending legislation. (Mayor Enander; Council Member Lee Eng)

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS ONLY
A. Tentative Council Calendar

COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTS AND DIRECTIONS ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
(Council Norms: It will be the custom to have a recess at approximately 9:00 p.m. Prior to the recess, the Mayor shall announce whether any items will be carried over to the next meeting. The established hour after which no new items will be started is 11:00 p.m. Remaining items, however, may be considered by consensus of the Council.)

SPECIAL NOTICES TO THE PUBLIC
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Los Altos will make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk 72 hours prior to the meeting at (650) 947-2610.

Agendas Staff Reports and some associated documents for City Council items may be viewed on the Internet at http://www.losaltosca.gov/citycouncil/online/index.html.

All public records relating to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, and that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body, will be available for public inspection at the Office of the City Clerk’s Office, City of Los Altos, located at One North San Antonio Road, Los Altos, California at the same time that the public records are distributed or made available to the legislative body.

If you wish to provide written materials, please provide the City Clerk with 10 copies of any document that you would like to submit to the City Council for the public record. 3 AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

GE JH N/A
City Manager Finance Director
Reviewed by:

City Attorney
Meeting Date: March 22, 2022
Subject: Commission Appointments
Prepared by: Andrea M. Chelemengos, City Clerk
Reviewed by: Jon Maginot, Assistant City Manager
Approved by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment(s):

None
Initiated by:

City Council
Previous Council Consideration: None
Fiscal Impact:

None
Environmental Review:

Not applicable
Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:

Does the Council wish to appoint the applicants to serve on the following Commissions? • Complete Streets
• Environmental Commission
• Parks and Recreation Commission
• Public Arts Commission
Summary:

Below is a summary of the number of seats to be filled, the terms, number of applications received for each Commission, an alphabetical listing of the applicants. Eligible incumbents seeking re-appointment are indicated with an asterisk (*) following the applicant’s name. All, but one of the applicant’s invited to the interview were interviewed by the City Council on March 1, 2022.
4 Agenda Item # A.

Subject: Commission Appointments – Complete Streets Commission, Environmental Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Public Arts Commission March 22, 2022, Page 2
COMPLETE STREETS COMMISSION: 3 full terms expiring march, 2026 4 applications received (1 new 3 incumbents*)
Stacy Banerjee*
Tom Gschneidner*
Nadim Maluf*
Scott Jacob Pietka
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION: 4 full terms expiring in March 2026 5 applications received (2 new 3 incumbents*)
Tom Hecht
David J Klein*
Shiao ping Lu*
Carl van Reis
Donald Weiden*
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION: 1 partial term expiring in March 2025

1 application received
Scott Spielman
PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION: 1 partial term expiring September 2025 1 application received
Dana Tasic
Staff Recommendation:

Appoint applicants to fill the vacancies on the Complete Streets Commission, Environmental Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission and the Public Arts Commission.
5 Agenda Item # A.

Subject: Commission Appointments – Complete Streets Commission, Environmental Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Public Arts Commission March 22, 2022, Page 3
Purpose
To fill existing or upcoming, due to expiration of terms, Commission vacancies.

Background
The City Council appoints individuals to serve on the various City Commissions and one Committee.

Except for Senior and Youth Commissioners, members are appointed to four-year terms and may serve a total of two consecutive terms plus the fulfillment of an unexpired term should they be so appointed.

Discussion/Analysis
Currently there are two (2) vacancies and seven (7) Commission terms expiring March, 2022 resulting in the following nine (9) Commission seats to be filled:

Complete Streets Commission: 3 full terms expiring March 2026 Environmental Commission: 4 full terms expiring in March 2026 Parks And Recreation Commission: 1 partial term expiring in March 2025 Public Arts Commission: 1 partial term expiring September 2025

On March 1, 2022, the City Council interviewed all but one of the applicants. 6 Agenda Item # A.

PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE

The following is public correspondence received by the City Clerk’s Office after the posting of the original agenda. Individual contact information has been redacted for privacy. This may not be a comprehensive collection of the public correspondence, but staff makes its best effort to include all correspondence received to date.

To send correspondence to the City Council, on matters listed on the agenda please email [email protected]
7 Agenda Item # A.

March 7, 2022

VIA EMAIL
Los Altos City Council
Los Altos City Hall
1 North San Antonio Road
Los Altos, CA 94022
Re: Public Comment Agenda Item #12 - March 8, 2022 Meeting – Commission Appointments
Dear Mayor Enander, Vice Mayor Meadows, Councilmember Lee Eng, Councilmember Weinberg, and Councilmember Fligor,
We are Los Altos residents and submit this unsolicited letter in support of Scott Spielman’s re-appointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission.

1. Mr. Spielman has demonstrated a commitment to representing the interests of the community at-large.

Section 4.1 of the City Council Norms and Procedures provides that commissioners represent the interests of the community at large. During his tenure as a commissioner on the Parks and Recreation Commission, Mr. Spielman was a role model of representing the interests of the community at large. As an example, when the commission was considering a site for a fenced-in dog park, many of us expressed our concern about the process during public comment. Mr. Spielman responded to our concern by proactively proposing a meeting with our neighborhood. He spent hours listening to our concerns and helping us understand the process. He also facilitated educating other commissioners about the concerns and issues we raised.

His dedication to reaching out to residents was a role model for seeking to represent the interests of the community at-large. Moreover, we believe his efforts contributed to enabling the city to move forward with the plan that the City Council recently approved.

2. Mr. Spielman is uniquely qualified to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission.

Mr. Spielman served on the commission for approximately 18 months. His effectiveness was recognized when he was elected Vice Chair. At a time when the Parks and Recreation Commission is considering many important matters, we believe the City Council and the commission will benefit from Mr. Spielman’s prior experience, familiarity with the current matters before the commission, as well as his pre-existing, positive working relationships with the current commission members. 8 Agenda Item # A.

We ask that each of you vote to re-appoint Mr. Spielman to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully submitted,
Janet Corrigan1, Harry Guy, Daryl Shafran, Michael Shafran, Mark Homan, Parisa Naseralavi, Sarah S. Shreve, and Kim Lorz

1 Signatory submits this letter as a resident of Los Altos and not as a member of the Public Arts Commission 9 Agenda Item # A.
10 Agenda Item # A.

From: Bette H
To: Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT - AGENDA ITEM 12 - Tuesday, March 8th Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 4:29:04 PM
As Mark Twain once famously said, if I had more time I would have been more concise.

To: City Council, City Manager, City Staff, and Public Comments Cc: PARC Chair Dailey (to forward to PARC)
I have significant concerns regarding the possible re-appointment of former PARC Commission Steven Spielman to the PARC Commission, which I will detail below. First, I wish to clearly state that I’m only speaking for myself - and I am thus sending this email from my personal address. Quite frankly I don’t know to what extent my non-optimistic opinion regarding Mr. Speilman’s candidacy may or may not represent the HDPPS steering committee or the off-leash supporter mailing list.

Some history: Mr. Speilman was on PARC when the off-leash pilot was designed and he stated in his March 1st commission interview that he was responsible for public outreach and that he did an excellent job of it. Mr. Speilman called particular attention to his public outreach work at Lincoln Park, Grant Park, and Heritage Oaks - all parks which ended up not being included in the pilot. How a pilot is designed and structured absolutely influences its results. Unless “no dog parks” is the City’s goal, please consider carefully whether to reappoint him.

Also if public outreach had been excellent, I still don’t fully understand why the off-leash community’s desires and needs were not acknowledged with respect to the chosen timeframes.

During a relentlessly-difficult pandemic, we dog owners were expected to adhere to significantly limited inconvenient hours despite a field that was empty for most of each day.

After the pilot closed, we learned the time constraints were designed to get us accustomed to sharing the field with Little League – although the league was on a hiatus of an unknown duration due to Covid 19. We were restricted to morning hours when many dog owners needed to help get their families and children ready for online work and school; preparing for work themselves; and then restricted to after-dark, mosquito-filled evening hours.

I spent at least 300 hours on the field for the six-month duration of the pilot (one hour in the morning and one hour in the evening) and during all that time I didn’t meet a single off-leash dog owner who thought the pilot hours did an adequate job of considering our needs. The limited hours presented multiple issues and challenges including forced congestion leading to more barking due to dogs getting riled up by the crowding, making the occasional passerby feel threatened and/or uncomfortable, as well as scaring off more timid dogs and puppies, and making it more difficult for owners to control their dogs when group play became too intense.

And while admittedly our dogs and our galoshes had an impact on the grass - imho the bulk of the damage was due to standing water leading to a grub infestation which brought in flocks of crows and possibly some raccoons as well, as under-watering due to some broken irrigation lines. I’d call it a comedy of errors, except it wasn’t funny. 11 Agenda Item # A.

As the owner of a now two-year-old dog, I have been following the dog park issue very closely. Mr. Speilman has also indicated a desire for more enforcement on several occasions. I remember a specific comment in the October 26, 2021 council meeting (which I located at the 3:29 time stamp) where Mr. Speilman stated the problems with the original implementation of Hillview were due to the recommendations not being completely followed. He said the City needed more of a team to monitor the pilot, “I believe the enforcement of the hours was inadequate and the field got more abuse than it should have because the hours were supposed to be limited.”
From this statement, I gather a) Mr. Spielman doesn’t understand that short hours didn’t mean less use of the field - our dogs still needed to socialize and play - we just all had to go at the same time, which as above led to congestion, dog fights, and more; and b) neither did he understand how the limited hours led to an “us versus them” mindset between people who had previously been cordial-enough-and-even-friendly neighbors.

Even residents who didn’t believe in the short time friends called police - probably to have some measure of control over the lack of fencing and the large influx of dog owners from all over the city who were looking for a safe-enough and legal place to off-leash. When opponents of off-leash can harass the off-leash community with constant police calls we end up with what near the end of the pilot felt like overtones of the Stanford Prison Experiment.

We dog owners are mostly highly capable adults with families, jobs, and multiple responsibilities. Do we really need to be supervised like a bunch of grade schoolers? What about acknowledging the pilot time constraints were overbearing and extremely inconvenient, in some cases precluding people’s abilities to off-leash their dogs at all? And instead of overreaching enforcement - and creating an atmosphere of ill-will and harassment - we might have opened up the hours to all-day play - and added a fence along the north side for a protective barrier between off-leash activity and people walking by.

While many off-leash dog owners across our city have been warned on occasion by animal control or the police that they are in violation of dog ordinances, I’ve never heard anyone actually get fined. I think that’s because the City isn’t prepared and quite frankly doesn’t have the resources to round us all up. Bring on the paddy wagons?? Once that hit the news, we might become the laughing stock of the country - as one of the most expensive places to live - but no safe and legal places for our dogs to play yet.

As for public outreach, maybe Mr. Spielman’s work at the other parks was fine, but at Hillview I heard off-leashers say they would start reserving a budget to pay for fines. Others said they wish we could all just go back to being unlawful and ignored. What I say is this:
we’ve reached a turning point where the City needs to make a choice on how to proceed. If the city appoints a PARC commissioner committed to increasing enforcement - the city should prepare to fully acknowledge that Los Altos is not meeting a basic need for possibly fifty percent of our residents.

Is the City willing to establish multiple off-leash parks throughout the city in the near term? Or should we continue with the current more gradual approach - the two parks in the works, with a second phase proposed for Hillview - and then possibly look for additional legal, safe, fenced play spaces further down the road. It has been a long and windy road to get here, but now the choices are pretty clear. Choosing a commissioner committed to enforcement, will force the city’s hand to deal with this sooner than later. 12 Agenda Item # A.

With much more work needed to ensure a smooth-enough deployment of the Hillview and MPW dog parks, we need to treat this commission appointment like a real job and actively recruit for someone with high-level required skills and knowledge. We don’t just need volunteers with good intentions, we need volunteers with good intentions and relevant skill sets - perhaps market or other research. While Mr. Speilman’s public outreach work may well be the best thing in the history of Los Altos, we want a better future for our dogs.

Sincerely,
Bette Houtchens
13 Agenda Item # A.
1 Adelina Del Real
From: Bette H
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2022 3:41 PM
To: Public Comment
Subject: Re: PUBLIC COMMENT - AGENDA ITEM 12 - Tuesday, March 8th // and Special Item - Tuesday, March 22nd
Categories: Yellow category
Again, if I had more time, I’d write more concisely...

To: City Council, City Manager, City Staff, PARC Commission and Public Comments Scott Spielman reached out to speak with me yesterday. He gave me some additional context on his commission work as well as his public comments, so I’d like to share some thoughts on my March 8th public comments letter below. I just noticed that commission applications will be reviewed at tonight's council meeting, so I’ll say I am no longer opposed to whether he is appointed to the PARC commission and I actually support him.

The two points of additional context concern 1) his public outreach efforts and 2) his 10/26/21 public comments regarding the use of enforcement during the Hillview pilot.

1. I admit I showed up at Hillview to off-leash my dog just as the pilot was getting underway so I didn’t have a full understanding of why Hillview was the only site selected when I criticized his work. Scott told me that during his public outreach he worked with nearby neighbors at Heritage Oaks on both sides of the issue and the PARC commission actually voted 4:3 in favor of a pilot there, but it was nixed 3:2 by council. So he did what he could to get to “yes” at Heritage Oaks, but he wasn’t part of the final decision. These are difficult community decisions with people strongly for and against off-leash, so we all play our parts and hold some responsibility for the outcomes.

2. In his public comments last October, Scott said, “I believe that the enforcement of the hours was inadequate and therefore I think the field got more abuse than it should have because our hours were supposed to be limited.” In our conversation yesterday, he clarified that his stance on enforcement is generally more about protecting the public from vicious dogs, so the 10/26/21 statement doesn’t give the full picture.

While I’m still vehemently opposed to the use of law enforcement to regulate severely limited off-leash time frames, and I don't think enforcing the time frames would have improved the condition of the field, I am strongly supportive of protecting the public from vicious dogs. There have been multiple cases of dog attacks - in at least a couple of cases dogs were killed. My own dog was attacked both in Palo Alto and in Mountain View. Also as the email hub for over 400 off-leash supporters these past seven months, I have a unique vantage point of what’s happening with dogs here in Los Altos - and many of the stories are very concerning.

After listening to Scott’s 10/26/21 public comments again, I noticed that he recommended pressing forward with the Hillview off-leash park while looking at other options, “If you were to stop this program you would eliminate something that’s been in the works for 12 years and I believe that some of the issues like fencing and conditioning could be remedied.” There was actually an effort to fight for off-leash as far back as 2003, so it’s been almost 20 years of struggle. Luckily, Council proceeded to authorize two dog parks, one in North Los Altos, one in South. 14 Agenda Item # A.
2 I strongly believe in safe, legal off-leash as a means to socializing, exercising, and protecting our dogs and the community at large. I also believe the need for off-leash spaces will increase as we add more housing - and thus more dogs - due to the new state mandates. Los Altos absolutely needs to press forward on this issue.

Whatever happens with this commission appointment, we should also have a citizen’s advisory group - consisting of people from all sides of the debate, who are committed to working together in the best interests of the whole community.

If I’ve missed anything, I’m open to feedback and continuing the conversation.

Sincerely,
Bette Houtchens
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:28 PM Bette H wrote:

As Mark Twain once famously said, if I had more time I would have been more concise.

Also if public outreach had been excellent, I still don’t fully understand why the off-leash community’s desires and needs were not acknowledged with respect to the chosen timeframes. During a relentlessly-difficult pandemic, we dog owners were expected to adhere to significantly limited inconvenient hours despite a field that was empty for most of each day. After the pilot closed, we learned the time constraints were designed to get us accustomed to sharing the field with Little League – although the league was on a hiatus of an unknown duration due to Covid 19. We were restricted to morning hours when many dog owners needed to help get their families and children ready for online work and school; preparing for work themselves; and then restricted to after-dark, mosquito-filled evening hours.

The overcrowding also led to some aggressive interactions, which likely wouldn’t have happened if we’d been allowed to use the parks throughout the day - easing congestion, noise and frustration on the part of people on the field, nearby neighbors and anyone passing by. And while admittedly our dogs and our galoshes had an impact on the grass - imho the bulk of the damage was due to standing water leading to a grub infestation which brought in flocks of crows and possibly some raccoons as well, as under-watering due to some broken irrigation lines. I’d call it a comedy of 15 Agenda Item # A.
3 errors, except it wasn’t funny.

As the owner of a now two-year-old dog, I have been following the dog park issue very closely. Mr. Speilman has also indicated a desire for more enforcement on several occasions. I remember a specific comment in the October 26, 2021 council meeting (which I located at the 3:29 time stamp) where Mr. Speilman stated the problems with the original implementation of Hillview were due to the recommendations not being completely followed. He said the City needed more of a team to monitor the pilot, “I believe the enforcement of the hours was inadequate and the field got more abuse than it should have because the hours were supposed to be limited.” From this statement, I gather a) Mr. Spielman doesn’t understand that short hours didn’t mean less use of the field - our dogs still needed to socialize and play - we just all had to go at the same time, which as above led to congestion, dog fights, and more; and b) neither did he understand how the limited hours led to an “us versus them” mindset between people who had previously been cordial-enough-and-even-friendly neighbors.

We dog owners are mostly highly capable adults with families, jobs, and multiple responsibilities. Do we really need to be supervised like a bunch of grade schoolers?
What about acknowledging the pilot time constraints were overbearing and extremely inconvenient, in some cases precluding people’s abilities to off-leash their dogs at all? And instead of overreaching enforcement - and creating an atmosphere of ill-will and harassment - we might have opened up the hours to all-day play - and added a fence along the north side for a protective barrier between off-leash activity and people walking by.

As for public outreach, maybe Mr. Spielman’s work at the other parks was fine, but at Hillview I heard off-leashers say they would start reserving a budget to pay for fines. Others said they wish we could all just go back to being unlawful and ignored. What I say is this: we’ve reached a turning point where the City needs to make a choice on how to proceed. If the city appoints a PARC commissioner committed to increasing enforcement - the city should prepare to fully acknowledge that Los Altos is not meeting a basic need for possibly fifty percent of our residents.

Sincerely,
Bette Houtchens
16 Agenda Item # A.
17 Agenda Item # A.
18 Agenda Item # A.
19 Agenda Item # A.
20 Agenda Item # A.
21 Agenda Item # A.
22 Agenda Item # A.

From: Frank Martin
To: City Council; City Manager; Public Comment
Subject: Solar Panel Fee Penalty - Itrm not on the agenda for next meeting Date: Sunday, March 13, 2022 3:24:30 PM
Dear council members and staff:

The previous city council passed a natural gas ban by a 3-2 vote. Neysa Fligor voted YES while Lynette Lee Eng and Anita Enander voted NO. Strong opposition failed to win the day. In my opinion a better way to reduce global warming gasses would be to encourage solar panel use by homeowners.

Since that vote I installed solar panels that eliminated my small $1,200 annual electricity bill by using an annual rent to own 4 kw panel system for $780 annually. A better way to do my part I thought.

Now Governor Newsom has an order sitting on his desk to impose an annual flat fee of $684 to every solar panel homeowner and also reduce the amount pays homeowners for their power that is generated.

These changes will make me pay more for electricity than if I did not have solar power! How dumb is that? I urge you to contact Newsom and demand that he veto this PGE grab of our wallets. If not, I can only assume we will see a reduction in new solar panel use by homeowners.

Sincerely,
Frank Martin
Sent from my iPhone
23 PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE
The following is public correspondence received by the City Clerk’s Office after the posting of the original agenda. Individual contact information has been redacted for privacy. This may not be a comprehensive collection of the public correspondence, but staff makes its best effort to include all correspondence received to date.

To send correspondence to the City Council, on matters listed on the agenda please email [email protected]
24 From: Connie Miller
To: Public Comment
Cc:

Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA - 03/22/22 Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:04:29 PM
I want to thank Vice Mayor Meadows and Councilmembers Fligor and Weinberg for passing the Los Altos Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) at the last Council meeting on March 8.

I note the CAAP included a letter from Mayor Enander. I respectfully request that this letter be removed from the CAAP for two reasons. First, the letter did not address the high priority issues in the CAAP but rather deflected the focus on low priority actions with an implication that climate fluctuations are typical and our current climate crisis is no more than that.

Second, the mayor did not vote to support the CAAP, and the letter seems incongruent given Mayor Enander’s NO VOTE on the CAAP.

Please remove Mayor Enander’s letter from the CAAP and replace it with a letter from one of the council members who had the forward thinking knowledge and courage to vote for the CAAP’s adoption.

Connie Miller – Los Altos Resident
P Please consider the environment before printing emails. 25 From: Adeline Kopp
To: Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA - 03/22/22 Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 9:41:49 PM
Thank you Council Members Meadows, Fligor and Weinberg for passing the Los Altos Climate Action and Adaptation Plan at the March 8 Council meeting. As a high school student, I felt that the CAAP is important to my future. I appreciate the time that you all have put into making our community a contributor to a more sustainable planet.

Although a step in the right direction, the CAAP was drawn away from its great aspects by the letter from Mayor Enander. Not only did the letter not address the high priority issues in the CAAP, but the mayor did not vote to support the CAAP.

I respectfully request that this letter be removed from the CAAP.

Adeline Kopp
Los Altos
26 From: Peter Mills
To: Public Comment; City Council
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA - 03/22/22 Date: Sunday, March 20, 2022 10:24:24 PM
Dear City Council:

On March 8, at the City Council meeting, the council passed the Los Altos Climate Action and Adaptation Plan.

Mayor Enander’s letter included in the CAAP does not mention any of the high priority issues in the CAAP, nor did the mayor vote to support the CAAP.

It seems to me that the city should not include the Mayor’s letter in the CAAP.

Sincerely,
Peter Mills
Los Altos
27 From: Young, Michael
To: City Council; Public Comment
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA - 03/22/22 Date: Monday, March 21, 2022 8:16:31 PM
Thank you Council Members Meadows, Fligor, and Weinberg for passing the Los Altos Climate Action and Adaptation Plan at the March 8 Council meeting. This means a lot to me as I am a Los Altos High School student and the CAAP will contribute to a sustainable planet for my future and my classmates.

However, the CAAP included a letter from Mayor Enander. Not only did the letter not address the high-priority issues in the CAAP, but the mayor did not vote to support the CAAP! I respectfully request that this letter be removed from the CAAP.

Sincerely,
Michael Young
Los Altos Resident
Los Altos High School Student
28 AMENDED

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
7:00 PM - Tuesday, March 08, 2022
via Teleconference

CALL MEETING TO ORDER
At 7 :00 p.m. Mayor Enander Called the meeting to order

ESTABLISH QUORUM
PRESENT: Council Members Fligor, Lee Eng, Weinberg, Vice Mayor Meadows and Mayor Enander
ABSENT: None

PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Aadya Gupta, of Girl Scout Troop 60145 led the Council in the Pledge

REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION
None

SPECIAL ITEM
A. Proclamation in Recognition of Nowruz
Mayor Enander provided background information and presented the proclamation.

CHANGES TO THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
Mayor Enander announced that staff had requested deferral of Agenda Item # 11 Historic Resource Inventory (HRI) and Council Member Meadows requested that Agenda Item # 10 - Police Facility Study Session Follow Up be consider following the Consent Calendar.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Roberta Phillips, Joe Beninato, Stan Wong, Gary Hedden, Toni Moos and Joan Muhfelder provided public comment.

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Minutes: Approve Minutes of the February 22, 2022, City Council Meeting

2. Quarterly Investment Portfolio Report : Receive the Investment Portfolio Report through December 31, 2021.
29 Agenda Item # 1.
3/8/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 2 of 4

3. Final Map and Subdivision Agreement - 4848 El Camino Real: Authorize the City Manager to execute the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and approve the Final Map for Tract Map #10552 - 4848 El Camino Real

4. Professional Services Contract: Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a one-year contract extension with Maze & Associates, at a cost not to exceed $52,175, for professional auditing services for the year ended June 30, 2022.

5. Zoning Text Amendment Ordinance (ZTA 21-005) Hold second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2022-485 amending Titles 1 and 14 of the Los Altos Municipal Code relating to appeals, ongoing maintenance of required landscape features, inclusionary housing requirements for certain housing development projects, and density bonuses; consideration of CEQA exemption finding pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3); consideration of Planning Commission recommendation to study feasibility of proposed inclusionary housing requirements

6. Annual Report from Independent Intake Official: Receive annual report from Independent Intake Official regarding Police complaints

7. Extension of Local Emergency: Adopt Resolution extending the declaration of a local emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Upon motion made by Council Member Lee Eng, Seconded by Council Member Fligor, the Consent Calendar was approved 5-0 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Fligor, Lee Eng, Weinberg, Vice Mayor Meadows, Mayor Enander NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None

DISCUSSION ITEMS

8. Historic Landmark Designation - American Legion Hall, 347 First Street: Consider request of property owners to designate the American Legion Hall at 347 First Street as a Historic Landmark and adopt the Resolution making findings that the designation is categorically exempt from CEQA and designate 347 First Street as a Historic Landmark pursuant to Los Altos Municipal Code Section 12.44.070. The Historical Commission has recommended approval of this designation.(S. Gallegos)
Associate Planner Gallegos provided a Staff Report and answered questions from the Council.

Mike Garavaglia, Historical Architect, also provided information and answered questions from the Council.

William Bassett, Ken Newman, and Cindy Newman, representig the American Legion Post 558, provided information and answered questions from the Council.

The Mayor called for public comment.

Chris provided comments on the matter.
30 Agenda Item # 1.
3/8/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 3 of 4
Following Council discussion, upon motion made by Council Member Lee Eng, Seconded by Council Member Fligor to adopt the Resolution making findings that the designation is categorically exempt from CEQA and designate 347 First Street as a Historic Landmark pursuant to Los Altos Municipal Code Section 12.44.070 passed with the following 5-0 roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Fligor, Lee Eng, Weinberg, Vice Mayor Meadows, Mayor Enander
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

10. Police Facility Study Session Follow Up: Consider report, discuss, and provide direction to staff including adoption of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to allocate General funds in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for the appointment of a Municipal Advisor, Ballot Measure Consultant, and a Polling Company and amending the Fiscal Year Operating Budget (G. Engeland)
Ciyt Manager Engelang provided background information and introduced John Kim from Stiefel Consulting, LLC who spoke on the matter and answeed questions from the Council.

Mayor Enander called for public comment.

Roberta Phillips commneted.

Council disccusion commenced. There was Council support for exploring multiple funding options through the polling process. There was also concern expressed relative to the impact the Housing Element process may have on this matter.

Concil Memebr Lee Eng expresssed an interest in reviewing the polling question prior to polling and concern with the cost. She inquired if the process and cost could be split into parts and the expenditure not granted all at once.

At the conclusion of the discussion, a motion was made by Council Member Weinberg, Seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows to adopt the resolution authorizing the City Manager to allocate funds friom the General Fund in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for the appointment of a Municipal Advisor, Ballot Measure Consultant, and a Polling Company and amending the Fiscal Year Operating Budget. The motion passed 4-0-1 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Member Fligor, Weinberg, Vice Mayor Meadows, Mayor Enander NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Council Member Lee Eng
At 9:14 p.m., Mayor Enander announced that Agenda Items #12 Commission Appointments, and #13 Council Legislative Subcommittee Update And Potential Council Action would be deferred to the next meeting. She then called for a brief recess at 9:15 p.m. At 9:27 p.m. the meeting was reconvended. 31 Agenda Item # 1.
3/8/2022 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES Page 4 of 4

9. 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan: Consider and approve the 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), an update to the 2013 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and make findings that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15308 as an action that will not have a significant impact on the environment, specifically, for the protection of the climate.

Interim Planning Services Manager Golden introduced consultant Ben Fordham who provided an overview of the the proposed plan and answered questions from the Council.

The following members of the public spoke: Gary Hedden, Connie Miller, Roberta Phillips, Kristel Wickman, Pete Dailey, Marty Liskowski, John M., and Teresa Morris.

Council discussion commenced.

Council Member Lee Eng and Mayor Enander expressed concern with the plan’s impact on and cost to the community as well as if enough public outreach, input, and education were conducted on the proposed plan. Mayor Enander also wondered if the plan had fully considered the area's projected popoulation increases.

Following discussion, Council Member Fligor moved to approve the 2022 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), an update to the 2013 Climate Action Plan (CAP) and make findings that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to section 15308. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Meadows and passed 3-2 with the following roll call vote:

AYES: Council Members Fligor, Weinberg, and Vice Mayor Meadows NOES: Council Member Lee Eng and Mayor Enander
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None

COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTS AND DIRECTIONS ON FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS Council Member Fligor, with support from Council Members Weinberg and Vice Mayor Meadows, requested that the Reach Codes be placed on a future Council meeting for consideration.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS ONLY
A. Tentative Council Calendar

ADJOURNMENT
At 11:29 p.m., Mayor Enander adjourned the meeting.
____________________________
Anita Enander MAYOR
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Andrea Chelemengos, CITY CLERK
32 Agenda Item # 1.

Reviewed By:

City Manager City Attorney
GE
Finance Director
JH JF

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY
Meeting Date: March 22, 2022
Subject Design Contract Amendment: Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road, Project CD-01012
Prepared by: Andrea Trese, Associate Civil Engineer
Reviewed by: Aida Fairman, Engineering Services Manager Jim Sandoval, Engineering Services Director
Approved by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment:

1. Resolution
Initiated by:

Capital Improvement Plan – Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Project CD-01012 Previous Council Consideration:

March 26, 2019
Fiscal Impact:
$13,665 and up to 10% contingency funds of the total design cost of $102,448 in the amount of $10,245
The following action will cost $13,665, which will bring the total contract value to $102,448.

The following action will also add contingency funds of up to 10% in the amount of $10,245 for additional construction support if needed.
- Breakdown of funds to be used:
o $13,665 from funds previously allocated to CIP budget CD-01012 from the General Fund
Funding Source: General Fund
Project: Annual Storm Drain Improvements CD-01012
Project balance from prior Years 12,492
Current Year Budget 950,000
Current request (design validation) (13,665)
Current request (contingency funds for construction support) (10,245) Balance Available $928,337
33 Agenda Item # 2.

Subject: Design Contract Amendment: Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road, Project CD-01012
March 22, 2022 Page 2
Environmental Review:

Categorically Exempt pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) - The City Council previously approved the award of the design contract. No changes to the design scope are proposed at this time. Therefore, it can be seen with certainty that the contract amendment will not pose a significant effect on the physical environment, and none of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.

Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:
 Not applicable
Summary:
 The amendment to the existing agreement with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers causes the total contract value to exceed the $100,000 limit, which requires authorization by Council
 The services covered in this amendment provide design validation for the Milverton Road drywells project, which was deferred during 2020 due to budget constraints during the COVID-19 pandemic
Staff Recommendation:

Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment on behalf of the City with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers in the amount of $13,665 to provide additional consulting services for for design validation for the Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road Drywells Project and up to 10% contingency funds of the total design cost in the amount of $10,245 for additional construction support, if needed
34 Agenda Item # 2.

Subject: Design Contract Amendment: Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road, Project CD-01012
March 22, 2022 Page 3
Purpose
Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment on behalf of the City with Schaaf & Wheeler in the amount of $13,665 and to provide additional consulting services for additional survey, potholing, and design validation for the Annual Storm Drain Improvements, Milverton Road Drywells Project up to 10% contingency funds of the total design cost in the amount of $10,245 for additional construction support, if needed.

Background
The 2016 Stormwater Master Plan identified and prioritized areas for storm drainage infrastructure improvements. The Milverton Road Drywells Project was prioritized in the plan due to historic flooding in the street. Drywells are able to improve drainage infrastructure without requiring piped connections to the storm drain system. Drywells also benefit local creeks by reducing urban stormwater runoff pollution.

The original design services agreement with Schaaf & Wheeler was executed on March 8, 2018 in the amount of $54,913. The first amendment to the agreement was executed on August 16, 2018 in the amount of $17,000 for additional services including potholing locations in the field to collect data on potential utility conflicts. The second amendment to the agreement in the amount of $16,780 was executed in April 2019 to perform additional land surveying, potholing, and design needed to address information gaps and additional design considerations to optimize the project plan.

Discussion/Analysis
The CIP budget for the Annual Storm Drain Improvements project was deferred in 2020 due to financial constraints arising from the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, the Milverton Road Drywells Project design finalization and construction was deferred. Most of the design services (contract total of $88,782 prior to Amendment No. 3) were completed and paid prior to the project being put on hold.

The project is now near design completion but requires this Amendment No. 3 for design validation since the initial design work was performed four years ago. The up to 10% design contingency is recommended for construction phase support.

Recommendation
The staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment on behalf of the City with Schaaf & Wheeler in the amount of $13,665 for the additional design validation services plus up to 10% contingency funds of the total design cost in the amount of $10,245.
35 Agenda Item # 2.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2022-XX Page 1
4883-0811-0098v1
NON-BC\27916001
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT No. 3

WITH SCHAAF & WHEELER FOR MILVERTON STORM DRAIN
IMPROVEMENTS NOT TO EXCEED $13,665 AND UP TO 10%
CONTINGENCY FUNDS NOT TO EXCEED $10,245
WHEREAS, the City has secured Schaaf & Wheeler to perform certain professional and technical services for the Milverton Storm Drain Improvements Project (engineering department); and
WHEREAS, the initial agreements did not require City Council approval, as they did not exceed the $100,000 threshold for City Manager approval; and WHEREAS, the project requires additional design validation services and will likely require additional construction support over the amount originally proposed; and WHEREAS, to ensure completion of the design validation and construction support for the Milverton Storm Drain Improvements Project, the City is requesting City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 with Schaaf & Wheeler for said project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved the award of the design contract; no changes to the design scope are proposed at this time; it therefore can be seen with certainty that the contract amendment will not pose a significant effect on the physical environment; and none of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Los Altos hereby

1. Authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Master Services Agreement in an amount not to exceed $13,665 and up to 10% contingency funds not to exceed $10,245 to provide additional design validation services and construction support.

2. Authorizes the City Manager to take such further actions as may be necessary to implement the foregoing agreement.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a Resolution passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Los Altos at a meeting thereof on the 22nd day of March, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
36 Agenda Item # 2.

ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. 2022-XX Page 2
4883-0811-0098v1
NON-BC\27916001
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
Anita Enander, MAYOR
Attest:
_____________________________
Andrea Chelemengos, MMC, CITY CLERK
37 Agenda Item # 2.

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

Reviewed By:

City Manager City Attorney
GE
Finance Director
JH JF
Meeting Date: March 22, 2022
Subject: Housing Element Annual Status Report
Prepared by: Steve Golden, Interim Planning Services Manager Reviewed by: Laura Simpson, Interim Community Development Director Approved by: Gabriel Engeland, City Manager
Attachment(s):

1. Housing Element Annual Progress Report Resolution

2. Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Calendar Year 2021) (Excel File)

3. Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Calendar Year 2021) (Saved as PDF files) Initiated by:

Staff
Previous Council Consideration:

None
Fiscal Impact:

None anticipated
Environmental Review:

This is exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because there is no possibility that receiving an update on the Housing Element’s Programs status will have a significant effect on the environment. As a separate and independent basis, this report is also exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)
Policy Question(s) for Council Consideration:

None as the city is required to submit the Housing Element Annual Progress Report to the state each year. The City Council is being asked to receive the report and provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the status of the Housing Element’s Programs.

Summary:
• Provides an update on the status and progress implementing the city’s Housing Element; and
• Gives the public an opportunity to provide oral testimony and written comment.

Staff Recommendation:
38 Agenda Item # 3.

Subject: Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Calendar Year 2021) March 22, 2022

Page 2 ends

Receive the progress report, provide the public with an opportunity to provide oral testimony or written comment, and approve the resolution authorizing staff to submit the report to the state as required by law.

Purpose
Provides the public with an opportunity to give oral testimony and written comment and the City Council with an update on the status of the Housing Element’s Programs.

Background
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65400, each city and county is required to prepare a Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status and progress in implementing its housing element. The APR must be prepared using forms and definitions adopted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The forms were first implemented in 2010 and the forms have been updated with data requirements in intervening years since then, plus other revisions have been included to enhance and improve the forms. The APR is meant to serve as a tool for tracking housing production data and the progress of a jurisdiction’s Housing Element implementation. The city of Los Altos 2015-2023 Housing Element was adopted by the City Council in March 2015 and certified by HCD the following October. The Housing Element is to be updated on an eight-year cycle as provided for by the regional planning oversight of the Association of Bay Area Government’s compliance with SB 375 the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act. Without this structure, housing elements must be updated on fiveyear cycles.

Discussion
The city of Los Altos Housing Element APR for Calendar Year (CY) 2021 is attached. To ensure accountability with respect to housing production in 2021, Table A reports on housing development applications that were submitted to the city in 2021. It should be noted that for the column “Date Application Submitted”, HCD’s definition for “application submitted” means an application submittal that has been determined complete by the jurisdiction. HCD instructs users that if the application was incomplete at the time of submittal, then to enter the date the application was determined complete by the city. Therefore, if an application was submitted to the city in 2021, but was not determined complete until 2022, it would not be included in this table. Table A2 includes the annual building activities including new construction (building permits issued), projects entitled (planning entitlement), and completed units (certificates of occupancy or final inspections). These tables include each housing site identified by assessor’s parcel number and address, and contains a variety of data including but not limited to: type/category of housing units, tenure, affordability level, deed restrictions, and density bonus eligibility. For the CY2021 APR the following qualifications apply to the data reported:
39 Agenda Item # 3.

Subject: Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Calendar Year 2021) March 22, 2022

Page 3 ends

• Housing projects where there is no net gain in residential units have been excluded. For example, where a parcel is demolishing one single-family residence and replacing it with one single-family residence have been excluded from the tables. • The affordability level for ADUs (issued building permits only) have been assigned an income category based on a statewide survey of ADUs and further research conducted by the Association of Bay Area Government (ABAG). For communities with Fair Housing concerns, ABAG has recommended the following assumptions to apply to the affordability of ADUs for communities with Fair Housing concerns: 5% very low income, 30% low income, 50% moderate income, and 15% above moderate income.

With regards to the city’s progress in meeting the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), Table B summarizes the Permitted Units Issued by Affordability and incorporates the previous reporting years. The Summary table, attached, provides a summary of the housing production numbers for the CY2021 APR. Progress on Housing Element program implementation is summarized in Table D. Housing Element programs are listed with a brief explanation regarding progress made in the reporting year. Note that many programs continue to be addressed on an ongoing basis, while other are complete.

The Housing Element APR was provided to the Planning Commission at their March 17th meeting.

Recommendation
Receive the progress report, provide the public with an opportunity to provide oral testimony or written comment, and approve the resolution authorizing staff to submit the report to the state as required by law.
40 Agenda Item # 3.

RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALTOS

ACCEPTING THE HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2021 AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE
REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH

AND THE CALFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65400 requires the planning agency to provide an annual report to the City Council, the Governor' s Office of Planning and Research and the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) regarding progress toward implementation of the housing element of the general plan; and WHEREAS, planning staff has prepared an annual progress report for the calendar year 2021, utilizing the prescribed forms and instructions provided by the State Department of Housing and Community Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public meeting on March 22, 2022; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Los Altos hereby receives and accepts the annual progress report on the Housing Element, attached and incorporated by reference herein, and authorizes staff to forward the report to the Governor's Office of Planning and Research and the State Department of Housing and Community Development pursuant to Government Code Section 65400.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Los Altos at a meeting thereof on the 22 rd day
of March 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
___________________________
Anita Enander, MAYOR
Attest:
_____________________________
Andrea Chelemengos, CMC, CITY CLERK
41 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) 1 3 4
RHNA Allocation by
Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by Income
Level
Deed Restricted 1 - - - - - - - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - 3 - -
Deed Restricted 17 - - - - - 2 - -
Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - 19 - -
Deed Restricted - - - - - - 6 - -
Non-Deed Restricted 1 - - - - - 31 - -
Above Moderate 97 224 9 49 - 107 23 58 - - 470 -
477
243 9 49 - 107 23 119 - - 550 300
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be reported as very low-income units.

Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 74 4
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.
38 Moderate
169
99 112
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 38 2
Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
165
61 Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period.

Total RHNA
Total Units
Income Level
Very Low
Low
42 Agenda Item # 3.
43 Agenda Item # 3.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS

REPORT (APR) INSTRUCTIONS

INTRODUCTION
Note: Some instructions and definitions can be found in the column headers of the tables. (Cells with red marke Government Code section 65400 requires that each city, county, or city and county, including charter cities, prepare an annual progress report (APR) on the status of the housing element of its general plan and progress in its implementation, using forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The following form is to be used for satisfying the reporting requirements of Government These forms and instructions, originally adopted March 27, 2010, have been updated to incorporate new Housing Element APR requirements pursuant to Chapter 374, Statutes of 2017 (Assembly Bill 879); Chapter 366, Statutes of 2017 (Senate Bill 35), Chapter 664, Statutes of 2019 (Assembly Bill 1486), Chapter 159, Statues of 2019 (Assembly Bill 101), Chapter 661, Statutes of 2020 (Assembly Bill 1255), Chapter 15, and Statutes of 2020 How to submit the Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR) The APR must be submitted to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year using the forms and tables specified by HCD. The APR provides information for the previous calendar year and must be submitted separately to both HCD and OPR (Gov. Code, § 65400.). There are two methods available for submitting APRs:

1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System - This allows jurisdictions to upload directly into HCD’s database, limiting the risk of errors. To use the online system, email [email protected], and request login information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is [email protected].

2. Email - Jurisdictions complete the Excel APR forms and submit to HCD at [email protected] and to OPR at [email protected]. When using the email method, send the electronic version as an Excel workbook attachment. Do not send a scanned copy of the tables. In addition to submitting Housing Element APRs, jurisdictions must also submit General Plan Annual Progress Reports to both HCD and OPR. Please email these documents to APR@hcd ca gov and opr apr@opr ca gov NOTE: When submitting successor entity reporting data as required pursuant to California Health and Safety Code 34176.1, the data must be identified as an addendum to the APR and emailed to [email protected] concurrently with the APR submittal. When using the online system, this report should be sent separately to the APR email box to satisfy the Government Code section 65400 reporting requirement.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

DEFINITIONS

FORM INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION

START HERE
TABLE A Housing Development Applications Submitted
TABLE A2 Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units TABLE B Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress – Permitted Units Issued By Affordability TABLE C Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need TABLE D Program Implementation Status pursuant to Government Code section 65583 TABLE E Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to Government Code section 65915.7 44 Agenda Item # 3.

TABLE F Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c)(2)
TABLE G Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of, pursuant to Government Code section 65400.1 Table H - Locally Owned or Controlled Lands Declared Surplus Pursuant to Government Code section 54221, or Identified as Excess Pursuant to Government Code section 50569

DEFINITIONS

1.“Above moderate income” means households earning more than 120 percent of area median income. 2.

Annual Progress Report (APR) means the housing element annual progress report required by Government Code section 65400 and due to HCD by April 1 of each year reporting on the prior calendar year’s activities 3.

Application submitted means an application submittal that has been determined complete by the jurisdiction

4.“Area Median Income (AMI)” means the median household income based on household size of a geographic area of the state, as annually updated by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50093.

5. “Certificate of occupancy date” is the date(s) the certificate(s) of occupancy, or other evidence of readiness for occupancy (e.g., final inspection, notice of completion), was/were issued.

6.“Committed Assistance” is when a local government has entered into a legally enforceable agreement within a specific timeframe spanning from the beginning of the RHNA projection and may be executed throughout the planning period. Committed Assistance includes obligating funds or other in-kind services for affordable units available for occupancy within two years of the agreement.

7.Completed Entitlement means a housing development or project which has received all the required land use approvals or entitlements necessary for the issuance of a building permit. This means that there is no additional action required to be eligible to apply and obtain a building permit

8. “Density Bonus” as defined in Government Code section 65915.

9.“Extremely low-income” means a household earning less than 30 percent of area median income pursuant to Health and Safety Code, section 50105.

10.Infill housing unit is defined as being a unit located within an urbanized area or within an urban cluster on a site that has been previously developed for urban uses, or a vacant site where the properties adjoining at least two sides of the project site are, or previously have been, developed for urban uses. For the purposes of this definition, an urbanized area or an urban cluster is as defined by the United States Census Bureau

11. “Locality” or “local government” means a city, including a charter city, a county, including a charter county, or a city and county, including a charter city and county.

12.“Lower-income or Low-Income” means a household earning less than 80 percent of area median income pursuant to Health and Safety Code, section 50079.5.

13.“Moderate income” means households whose income does not exceed 120 percent of area median income pursuant to Health and Safety Code, section 50093.

14.Permitted units mean units for which building permits for new housing construction have been issued by the local government during the reporting calendar year. For this purpose, “new housing unit” means housing units as defined by the Department of Finance for inclusion in the Department of Finance’s annual “E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates” report, which is the same as the Census definition of a housing unit Note: Accessory dwelling units (ADU) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADU) pursuant to Government Code sections 65852.2 and 65852.22 meet the definition above. 45 Agenda Item # 3.

15. “Production report” or “Annual Progress Report (APR)” means the information reported pursuant to subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 65400 of Government Code.

16.Project or Development refers to a housing related activity where new construction of a unit(s) is proposed or has had a building permit and/or certificate of occupancy issued during the reporting calendar year.

This may include single family, mixed use, multifamily, accessory dwelling unit, or any other developments where housing units, as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau and the California Department of Finance, are a component of the project

17.“Realistic Capacity” means an estimate of the number of units that can be accommodated on each site in the inventory. The estimate must include adjustments to reflect land use controls and site improvement requirements but may rely on established minimum density standards.

18.Reporting period means the prior calendar year s activities for the housing element annual progress report required by Government Code section 65400 and due to HCD by April 1 of each year and utilized to create the determination for which locality is subject to the Streamlined Ministerial Approval (SB35 Streamlining) Provisions

19.“RHNA” means the local government’s share of the regional housing need allocation pursuant to Government Code section 65584 et seq.

20. Unit Category: type of units that are classified under the following categories:
•Single Family-Detached Unit (SFD)- a one-unit structure with open space on all four sides. The unit often possesses an attached garage.
•
Single Family-Attached Unit (SFA)- a one-unit structure attached to another unit by a common wall, commonly referred to as a townhouse, half-plex, or row house. The shared wall or walls extend from the foundation to the roof with adjoining units to form a property line. Each unit has individual heating and plumbing •2-, 3-, and 4-Plex Units per Structure (2-4)- a structure containing two, three, or four units and not classified as single-unit attached structure.
•5 or More Units per Structure (5+)- a structure containing five or more housing units. •Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) - means a unit that is attached, detached or located within the living area of the existing dwelling or residential dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel on which the single-family dwelling is situated pursuant to Government Code section 65852.2. An ADU also includes the following: an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code •Mobile Home Unit/Manufactured Home – a one-unit structure that was originally constructed to be towed on its own chassis. Please note: Spaces in a mobile home park can be counted towards RHNA, if the spaces counted are new hook-ups/spaces rather than new mobile home park residents moving onto existing lots.

21. “Very low-income” means households earning less than 50 percent of area median income pursuant to Health and Safety Code, section 50105.

AUTHORITY CITED: Government Code section 65400.

FORM INSTRUCTIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION
Fields in gray auto-populate. No data entry is needed.

Some of the cells are locked to ensure data can be automatically uploaded to the online system.

Tables A and A2 of the worksheet are currently configured to accept up to 1,000 lines of data. Insert rows if Projects are now tracked at all stages of development, from initial application to final certificate of occupancy.

All dates must be entered as month/date/year (e.g., 6/1/2018).

The form works best with macros enabled in Excel.

Begin with the “Start Here” tab, as previous years’ information will pre-populate in Table B after the 46 Agenda Item # 3.

START HERE
Enter general contact and report information in the “Start Here” tab.

It is important to start with this worksheet because the answers entered will affect how information is displayed (e.g. permit numbers from prior years are pre-populated when jurisdiction’s name is entered).

Information to enter includes:
•City or County name
•
Reporting calendar year (e.g., 2019). Please note: The reporting year will always be from January 1 – December 31 of the previous year.
•Contact person
•Title
•Email
•Phone
•Mailing address
This sheet includes instructions regarding submitting the Housing Element APR to HCD and OPR.

TABLE A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Only include data on housing units and developments for which an application was deemed complete between January 1st and December 31st of the reporting year identified on the “Start Here” tab. In table A, an “application” is a formal submittal of a project for approval. This application is either an application for a discretionary entitlement, or where only a ministerial process is required (e.g., zoned by right).

1. Project Identifier: Include the Current Assessor Parcel Number (APN) and street address. The Prior APN, Project Name and Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID are optional. •Prior APN – Enter an APN previously associated with the parcel, if applicable (optional field). •Current APN – Enter the current available APN. If necessary, enter additional APNs in the notes section field •
Street Address – Enter the number and name of street.
•Project Name – Enter the project name, if available (optional field). •Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID – This may be the permit number or other identifier (optional field).

2. Unit Types: Each development should be categorized by one of the following codes. Refer to “Unit Category” in the Definitions section for additional descriptions. Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following •SFA (single-family attached unit)
•SFD (single-family detached unit)
•
2-4 (two- to four-unit structures)
•5+ (five or more unit structure, multifamily)
•ADU (accessory dwelling unit)
•MH (mobile home/manufactured home)

3. Tenure: Identify whether the units within the development project are either proposed or planned at initial occupancy for either renters or owners. Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following options:
47 Agenda Item # 3.
•
Renter occupant (R) or
•Owner occupant (O)

4. Date Application Submitted: Enter the date the housing development application was submitted. If the application was incomplete at the time of submittal, enter the date the application was determined complete by the local government (refer to “application submitted” under definitions). Enter date as month/day/year (e.g.,

5. Proposed Units Affordability by Household Incomes: For each development, list the number of units proposed in the application by affordability level and whether the units are deed restricted or non-deed restricted. Refer to the Definitions section for additional descriptions:

Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
Moderate-income households: 80-120% AMI
Above-moderate households: above 120%
To verify income levels, refer to the income limit charts on HCD’s website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grantsfunding/income-limits/state-and-federal-income-limits.shtml (see section for Official State Income

6. Total Proposed Units by Project: This field auto-populates with the total number of units proposed, as entered in #5 (total of deed restricted & non-deed restricted units for Very Low-, Low-, Moderate- and Above

7. Total Approved Units by Project: Enter the number of units that the jurisdiction approved for this project

8. Total Disapproved Units by Project. If the project is denied or total number of units is reduced, please enter the number of units denied or reduced. This value should equal Total Proposed Units by Project minus “Total Approved Units by Project.”

9. Was “Application Submitted” pursuant to Government Code section 65913.4, subdivision (b) (Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35 Streamlining))? Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following •No
•Yes – But no action taken
•Yes – Approved
•Yes – Denied

10. Was a Density Bonus application received for this project? Answer yes or no.

11. Was the Density Bonus application approved for this project? Answer yes or no.

12. Please indicate the status of the application. Use the drop-down to select one of the following options:
•Approved
•Pending
•
Disapproved

13. Notes: Use this field to enter any applicable notes about the project or development. Completion of this field TABLE A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary – New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Fields 1 through 15 Housing Development Information This table requires information for very low, low, moderate and above moderate income housing affordability categories and for mixed-income projects. Include data on net new housing units and developments that have •An entitlement
•A building permit
•A certificate of occupancy or other form of readiness that was issued during the reporting year. 48 Agenda Item # 3.

Please note: Only building permits are used for the purposes of determining progress towards RHNA (fields 7, 8 and 9 of this table, described below).

New housing units: For the APR, “new housing unit” means housing units as defined by the Department of Finance for inclusion in the Department of Finance’s annual “E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates” report, which is the same as the census definition of a housing unit.

Development activity spanning multiple years: It is highly likely that the same project will be reported in multiple years of APRs. For example, a project should be listed in three separate APRs if it is entitled in one year, receives the building permit next year, and the certificate of occupancy in the year following.

In scenarios where development activity spans multiple years, the jurisdiction should only report activity that occurred within the reporting year. For example, if a project received building permits in 2018 , but received entitlements in 2017 , the 2018 APR should only report the building permit information (fields 7, 8 and 9), and Separate living quarters: A house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room occupied as separate living quarters, or if vacant, intended for occupancy as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. For vacant units, the criteria of separateness and direct access are applied to the intended occupants whenever possible.

Please note: Group quarters facilities, such dormitories, student houisng, bunkhouses, and barracks cannot be counted as housing units.

Net new units: If a building is being demolished to build the new units, the APR should report net new units. For example, if 10 units are being demolished on a site to build a 100-unit building, the APR should report 100 new units and 10 units in the demolished/destroyed column. In the case of new construction where fewer units are being built than were there previously, do not report negative permits.

To assist in reporting demolished/destroyed units, refer to section number 20 below (Table A2, column 20).

All new unit information is to be listed in the following fields:

Fields 1 through 3 – Project Identifier and Unit Types

1. Project Identifier: Include the Current Assessor Parcel Number (APN) and street address. The prior APN, project name or local jurisdiction tracking ID are optional. •Prior APN – Enter an APN previously associated with the parcel, if applicable (optional field). •Current APN – Enter the current available APN. This field allows a maximum of 40 characters. If necessary enter additional APNs in the notes section field number 21. •Street Address – Enter the number and name of street.
•Project Name – Enter the project name, if available (optional field). •
Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID – This may be the permit number or other identifier (optional field).

2. Unit Category Codes: Each development should be categorized by one of the following codes: Refer to “Unit Category” in the Definitions section for additional descriptions. Use the drop-down menu to select one of the •SFA (single-family attached unit)
•
SFD (single-family detached unit)
•2-4 (two- to four-unit structures)
•5+ (five or more unit structure, multifamily)
•
ADU (accessory dwelling unit)
•MH (mobile home/manufactured home)

3. Tenure: Identify whether the units within the development project are either proposed or planned at initial occupancy for either renters or owners. Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following options:
•Renter occupant (R) or
•Owner occupant (O)
Fields 4 through 6 – Completed Entitlement
49 Agenda Item # 3.

4. Affordability by Household Income – Completed Entitlement: For each development, list the number of units that have been issued a completed entitlement during the reporting year by affordability level and whether the units are deed restricted or non-deed restricted. Refer to the Definitions section for additional descriptions:
•Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
•Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
•Moderate-income households: 80-120% AMI
•
Above-moderate households: above 120%
To verify income levels, refer to the income limit charts on HCDs website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grantsfunding/income-limits/state-and-federal-income-limits.shtml (see section for Official State Income

5. Entitlement Date Approved: Enter the date within the reporting year that all required land use approvals or entitlements were issued by the jurisdiction; leave blank if entitlement was approved outside the reporting year.

Enter date as month/day/year (e.g., 6/1/2018). Refer to definition of “Completed Entitlement.”

6. # of Units Issued Entitlements: This is an auto-populated field. This field reflects the total number of units that were entitled for very-low, low, moderate, and above moderate income, as entered in field 4 on this table.

Fields 7 through 9 – Building Permit

7. Affordability by Household Income – Building Permits: For each development, list the number of units that have been issued a building permit during the reporting year by affordability level and whether the units are deed restricted or non-deed restricted. Refer to the Definitions section for additional descriptions:
•Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
•
Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
•Moderate-income households: 80-120% AMI
•Above-moderate households: above 120%
To verify income levels, refer to the income limit charts on HCDs website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grantsfunding/income-limits/state-and-federal-income-limits.shtml (see section for Official State Income

8. Building Permits Date Issued: Enter the date within the reporting year that the building permit was issued by the jurisdiction; leave blank if building permit was issued outside the reporting year. Enter date as month/day/year (e.g., 6/1/2018). Refer to definition of “Permitted Units.”

9. # of Units Issued Building Permits: This is an auto-populated field. This field will sum units that were permitted for very-low, low, moderate, and above moderate income, as entered in field 7 on this table.

Fields 10 through 12 – Certificates of Occupancy

10. Affordability by Household Income – Certificates of Occupancy: For each development, list the number of units that issued certificates of occupancy or other form of readiness (e.g., final inspection, notice of completion) during the reporting year by affordability level and whether the units are deed restricted or non-deed restricted.

Refer to the Definitions section for additional descriptions:
•Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
•
Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
•Moderate-income households: 80-120% AMI
•Above-moderate households: above 120%
To verify income levels, refer to the income limit charts on HCDs website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/grantsfunding/income-limits/state-and-federal-income-limits.shtml (see section for Official State Income

11. Certificates of Occupancy (or other forms of Readiness) Date Issued: Enter the date the certificate of occupancy or other form of readiness (e.g., final inspection, notice of completion) was issued for the project. For most jurisdictions, this is the final step before residents can occupy the unit. Leave blank if certificate of occupancy was not issued in the reporting year. Enter date as month/day/year (e.g., 6/1/2018). 50 Agenda Item # 3.

12. # of Units Issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of Readiness: This is an auto-populated field. This field will sum units that were issued a certificate of occupancy for very-low, low, moderate, and above moderate income, as entered in field 10 on this table.

13. How many of the Units were Extremely-Low Income Units (Optional): To gain a greater understanding of the level of building activity to meet the needs of extremely low-income households in the state, HCD asks that you estimate, to the extent possible, the number of units affordable to extremely-low income households. This number will be a subset of the number of units affordable to very low-income households, as indicated in fields 4, 7 and 10 above. Please note: The number entered in the very low section will not be reduced by the number

14. Was Project approved using Government Code section 65913.4, subdivision (b) (Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process (SB 35 Streamlining))? Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following options:
•
“Y” if jurisdiction approved the project application pursuant to the streamlined ministerial approval process (SB 35 Streamlining).
•“N” for all other situations.

15. Are these infill units? To gain a greater understanding of the level of infill housing activity in the state, HCD asks that you clarify if the housing units reported are infill by selecting “Yes” or “No.” Although completion of this field is optional, your input would be greatly appreciated. See Definitions section for “infill housing units” Fields 16 through 18: Please note, if any units are reported as very-low, low, or moderate income in fields 4, 7 or 10 then information in fields 16, 17 and/or 18 must be completed to demonstrate affordability. In the absence of justification that the unit is affordable to a very- low, low, and moderate income household, the Fields 16 and 17 Housing with Financial Assistance and/or Deed Restrictions For all housing units developed or approved with public financial assistance and/or have recorded affordability deed restriction or covenants, identify funding sources and/or mechanisms that enable units to be affordable.

16. Assistance Programs Used for Each Development: Enter information here if units received financial assistance from the city or county and/or other subsidy sources, have affordability restrictions or covenants, Use the drop-down menu to select the acronym of the applicable funding program(s), as listed below. To select more than one funding source click once then select the cell again and click another source. •
Acq/Rehab: CalHFA Acquisition/Rehab Loan Program
•AHP: Affordable Housing Program - Fed Home Loan
•AHSC: Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities
•CalHOME: CalHOME
•CDBG: Community Development Block Grant
•CDLAC: CDLAC Bonds (CA Debt Limit Allocation Committee) •
CESH: CA Emergency Solutions & Housing
•ESG: Emergency Solutions Grant
•GSAF: Golden State Acquisition Fund
•HEAP: Homeless Emergency Aid Program
•HHAP: Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program •HKEY: Homekey
•
HOME: Housing Investment Partnership Program
•HOPWA: Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
•IIG: Infill Infrastructure Grant
•
LHTF: Local Housing Trust Funds
•LIHTC: CTCAC/Low Income Housing Tax Credits
•MHP: Multifamily Housing Program - HCD
•MHSA: Mental Health Services Act Funding
•MPRROP: Mobilehome Park Rehab & Resident Ownership Program 51 Agenda Item # 3.
•
MRB: Mortgage Revenue Bonds
•MyHOME: MyHome Down Payment Assistance
•NHTF: National Housing Trust Fund
•
NPLH: No Place Like Home
•PBS8: Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance
•PDLP: Predevelopment Loan Program
•
RAD: Rental Assistance Demonstration Program
•
RDA: Redevelopment Agency or Successor Agency Funds
•Sec 202: HUD Section 202 Housing for the Elderly
•Sec 811: Section 811 Project Rental Assistance
•SERNA: Joe Serna Jr Farmworker Housing Program
•SHMHP: Supportive Housing MHP
•SNHP: Special Needs Housing Program - CalHFA
•TOD: Transit Oriented Development Program
•USDA: USDA Rural Development Housing Programs
•VHHP: Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention Program •
Other: Describe in Notes

17. Deed Restriction Type: Enter information here if units in the project are considered affordable to very-low, low, and/or moderate income households due to a local program or policy, such as an inclusionary housing ordinance, regulatory agreement, or a density bonus. This field should not be used to enter the number of deed restricted units. Identify the mechanism used to restrict occupancy based on affordability to produce “deed •“INC” if the units were approved pursuant to a local inclusionary housing ordinance. •“DB” if the units were approved using a density bonus. •“Other” for any other mechanism. Describe the source in notes section number 21.

18. Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions: Enter information here if the units are affordable to very-low, low and moderate income households without financial assistance and/or deed restrictions. In these cases, affordability must be demonstrated by proposed sales price or rents. •
Sales prices and rents must meet the definition of affordable as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5 for owner-occupied units or Health and Safety Code section 50053 for renter-occupied units. •Describe how the newly constructed rental or ownership housing units were determined to be affordable to very- low, low, and moderate income households without either public subsidies or restrictive covenants. This may be based on various methods considering sales prices or rents relative to the income levels of households such as through a survey of comparable units in the area that show the unit would be affordable to very-low, oThe jurisdiction can consider comparable rental prices or new sales prices (actual or anticipated). The jurisdiction should consider costs for renters (i.e., 30% of household income for rent and utilities) or owners (e.g., 30% of household income for principal, interest, taxes, insurance and utilities, pursuant to Title 25 CCR •In the absence of justification that the unit is affordable to a very- low, low, and moderate income household, the unit must be counted as above-moderate income.

19. Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction: If units have committed financial assistance and/or are deed restricted, enter the duration of the affordability or deed restriction. If units are affordable in perpetuity, enter 1,000. If multiple funding sources or deed restrictions on the development have different terms of affordability, please enter the longest term of affordability. Although completion of this field is optional, your input would be

20. Demolished/Destroyed Units: This section is to report if the project and associated APN, has a permit, entitlement or certificate of occupancy in the reporting year, and the APN previously had demolished or •Enter the “Number of Demolished or Destroyed Units” in the reporting calendar year. 52 Agenda Item # 3.
•
From the drop down menu select “demolished” if the units were torn down. Select “Destroyed” if the units were lost due to fire or other natural disaster.
•From the drop down menu “Demolished/Destroyed Units Owner or Renter” select “R” for renter or “O” for Fields 21 through 24 Density Bonus Detail: The following fields must be completed for at least a sample of density bonus projects reported by the jurisdiction and should only be completed if “DB” is one of the selections

21. Density bonus: This section and the sections to follow are for reporting if the project received a density bonus, including concessions, incentives, waivers, or other modifications. The first field asks for the percentage of density bonus that was applied to the project.
•If the planning area's maximum allowable density is calculated based on the allowable number of units, express your response as a percentage (New total number of units - Old total number of units)/(Old total number of units); NOTE THAT WE ARE NOT PROPOSING TO EXPRESS THE DENSITY AS UNITS PER ACRE. •Alternatively, if the planning area's maximum allowable density is form- or volume-based, express your response as a percentage (New maximum allowable residential gross floor area - Old maximum allowable residential gross floor area)/(Old maximum allowable residential gross floor area)

22. Percentage of deed-restricted units: Enter the percentage of deed-restricted units in the project expressed as (percentage of deed-restricted units) / (total number of units) NOTE THAT THIS CALCULATION MIGHT ALSO BE

PROBLEMATIC IF THERE ARE DEED-RESTRICTED UNITS MANDATED BY ANOTHER SUBSIDY PROGRAM

23. Number of incentives and other modifications: Enter the total number of other incentives, concessions, waivers, or other modifications given to the project (exclude parking waivers or parking reductions). List the specific incentives, concessions, waivers, or other modifications given to the project using the drop-down menu. •
On-Site Improvements
•Off-Site Improvements
•Development Standards Modification
•Other

24. Reductions or waivers of parking standards:
•Did the project receive a reduction or waiver of parking standards? Answer Yes or No.

25. Notes: Use this field to enter any applicable notes about the project or development.

TABLE B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress – Permitted Units Issued By Affordability Table B is a summary of prior permitting activity in the current planning cycle, including permitting activity for the calendar year being reported. Please note, the last year of the 5th cycle will only contain units with permit dates that occurred before the end of the cycle. The first year of the 6th cycle will only contain units with permits that occurred on or after the beginning of the cycle. To assist jurisdictions in completing this form, HCD has pre-filled permit data as reported to HCD on prior APRs. Past unit information will auto-populate when the jurisdiction’s name in the general information section of the “Start Here” tab is entered. Current year permitted units will auto-populate from data reported in table A2. If permit activity for current year is inaccurate, Please contact HCD at [email protected] if data from previous years does not populate or if different than the information supplied in Table B. Any changes made by localities to previous years’ data in Table B will not update Table B reports the number of units for which permits were issued to demonstrate progress in meeting the jurisdiction’s share of regional housing need for the planning period.

1. Regional Housing Needs Allocation by Income Level: Lists the jurisdiction’s assigned RHNA for the planning cycle by income group. This field will be auto-populated once the jurisdiction’s name is entered in the “Start

2. Year: Lists the building permit data for each year of the RHNA planning cycle beginning in the first year and ending with the data from the current reporting year which can be found in Table A2.

3. Total Units to Date (all years): Totals the number of units permitted in each income category. 53 Agenda Item # 3.

4. Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level: This field uses the information from the “Total Units to Date” category and deducts the units by income category from the jurisdiction’s assigned RHNA number. Note: The total units remaining to meet the RHNA allocation is in the bottom right hand corner.

TABLE C
Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need Please note: This table should only be filled out when a city or county identified an Unaccommodated Need of sites from the previous planning period Government Code section 65584.09, has Shortfall of Sites as identified in the housing element Government Code section 65583, subdivision (c)(1); or is identifying additional sites required by No Net Loss law pursuant to Government Code section 65863. The data in this inventory serves as an addendum to the housing element sites inventory. This table should not include rezoning for a specific project.

1. Project Identifier: Include the Assessor Parcel Number (APN) and street address. The project name and local jurisdiction tracking ID are optional.

2. Date of Rezone: If rezone was required, identify the date the rezone occurred. Enter date as month/day/year

3. RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category: For each development or site, list the number of units that are affordable to the following income levels (refer to Definitions section for more detail):
•
Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
•Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
Note: rezoning is not required to accommodate moderate or above moderate RHNA shortfall.

4. Rezone Type: From the dropdown list, select one of the following for each project:
•No Net Loss (Government Code section 65863): When a jurisdiction permits or causes its housing element sites inventory site capacity to be insufficient to meet its remaining unmet RHNA for lower and moderateincome households. In general, a jurisdiction must demonstrate sufficient capacity on existing sites or make available adequate sites within 180 days of there being insufficient sites to meet the remaining RHNA. •Unaccommodated Need (Government Code section 65584.09): When a jurisdiction failed to identify or make adequate sites available in the prior planning period to accommodate its RHNA by income category. Note:

When this condition occurred, the housing element in the current planning period in most cases will have a program to make available adequate sites to address the unmet RHNA by income category in the first year of the •Shortfall of Sites (Government Code section 65583, subdivision (c)(1)): When a jurisdiction does not identify adequate sites to accommodate its RHNA by income category in the current planning period. Note: When this condition occurred, the housing element for the current planning period must have included a program to make available adequate sites to address the unmet RHNA by income category. For jurisdictions on an eight year planning period, the rezones must be complete within the first three years of the planning period.

5. Parcel Size (Acres): Enter the size of the parcel in acres.

6. General Plan Designation: Enter the new General Plan Land Use designation. If no change was made, enter the current designation.

7. Zoning: Enter the new zoning designation for the parcel. If no change was made, enter the current zoning

8. Density Allowed: Enter the minimum and maximum density allowed on each parcel. This is the density allowed after any zoning amendments are made. If no maximum density enter N/A.

9. Realistic Capacity: Enter the estimated realistic unit capacity for each parcel. Refer to Definitions for more information about “Realistic Capacity.”

10. Vacant/Non-vacant: From the drop-down list, select if the parcel is vacant or non-vacant. If the parcel is nonvacant, then enter the description of existing uses in Field 11. 54 Agenda Item # 3.

11. Description of Existing Uses: Include a description of existing uses. Description must be specific (i.e. SFR, MF, surplus school site, operating business, vacant commercial building, parking lot). Classifications of uses (i.e. “commercial”, “retail”, “office”, or “residential”) are not sufficient.

TABLE D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to Government Code section 65583 Report the status/progress of housing element program and policy implementation for all programs described in the housing element:

1.Name of Program: List the name of the program as described in the element.

2. Objective: List the program objective (for example, “Update the accessory dwelling unit ordinance”).

3.Timeframe in Housing Element: Enter the date the objective is scheduled to be accomplished.

4.Status of Program Implementation: List the action or status of program implementation.

For your information, the following list includes the statutory requirements for housing element programs:
•Adequate sites (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1)). Please note: Where a jurisdiction has included a rezone program pursuant to Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (h) to address a shortfall of capacity to accommodate its RHNA, Table C must include specific information demonstrating progress in implementation including total acres, brief description of sites, date of rezone, and compliance with by-right approval and density •Assist in the development of low- and moderate-income housing (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(2)). •Remove or mitigate constraints (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3)). •Conserve and improve existing affordable housing (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(4)).

Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(5)). •Preserve units at-risk of conversion from low-income use (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(6).

Please note: Jurisdictions may add additional rows in Table D to include all Housing Element programs, or to provide clarification or information relevant to demonstrating progress towards meeting RHNA objectives.

TABLE E
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to Government Code section 65915 7 Government Code section 65915.7 states:
“(a) When an applicant for approval of a commercial development has entered into an agreement for partnered housing described in subdivision (c) to contribute affordable housing through a joint project or two separate projects encompassing affordable housing, the city, county, or city and county shall grant to the commercial developer a development bonus as prescribed in subdivision (b). Housing shall be constructed on the site of the If the jurisdiction has approved any commercial development bonuses during the reporting year, enter the

1. Project Identifier: Include the parcel’s APN number and street address. The project name and local jurisdiction tracking ID are optional.

2. Units Constructed as Part of the Agreement: For each development, list the number of units that are affordable to the following income levels (refer to definitions for more detail):
•Very low-income households: 0-50% AMI
•Low-income households: 50-80% AMI
•
Moderate-income households: 80-120% AMI
•Above-moderate households: above 120%

3. Description of Commercial Development Bonus: Include a description of the commercial development bonus approved by the jurisdiction.
55 Agenda Item # 3.

4. Commercial Development Bonus Date Approved: Enter the date that the jurisdiction approved the commercial development bonus. Enter date as month/day/year (e.g., 6/1/2018).

TABLE F
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c)
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c).

Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be Units that Do Not Count Toward RHNA: The jurisdiction may list for informational purposes only, units that do not count toward RHNA but were substantially rehabilitated, acquired or preserved.

Units that Count Toward RHNA: To enter units in this table as progress toward RHNA, please contact HCD at [email protected]. HCD will provide a password to unlock the grey fields.

In order to count units reported in this table as progress towards RHNA, the jurisdiction will need to provide information that demonstrate the units meet the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). These program requirements are summarized on the Alternative Adequate Sites Checklist.

If HCD finds that the units meet the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c) these units may credit up to 25 percent of the jurisdiction’s adequate sites requirement per income category.

Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of, pursuant to Government Code section 65400.1 Chapter 664, Statutes of 2019 (AB 1486) added to the Government code section 65400.1, which requires jurisdictions to include in this APR a listing of sites owned by the locality that were included in the housing element sites inventory and were sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.

The listing of sites must include the entity to whom the site was transferred, and the intended use of the site.

Table H
Locally Owned or Controlled Lands Declared Surplus Pursuant to Government Code section 54221, or Identified as Excess Pursuant to Government Code section 50569 Chapter 661, Statutes of 2019 (AB 1255) amended Government Code section 54230 to require cities and counties to create an inventory of surplus lands defined in subdivision (b) of Section 54221, and all lands in excess of its foreseeable needs, if any, identified pursuant to Section 50569, located in all urbanized areas and urban clusters, as designated by the United States Census Bureau, within the jurisdiction of the county or city that the county or city or any of its departments, agencies, or authorities owns or controls. Please note:

Jurisdictions are only required to report on property located in an urban area or urbanized cluster. For a map https://cahcd.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=5a63b04d7c494a6ebb2aa38a2c3576f5 Cities and counties must make a description of each parcel described in paragraph (1) of Government Code section 54230 and the present use of the parcel a matter of public record and shall report this information to the Department of Housing and Community Development no later than April 1 of each year, beginning April 1, 2021, in a form prescribed by the department, as part of its annual progress report submitted pursuant to paragraph 56 Agenda Item # 3.
“Surplus land” means land owned in fee simple by any local agency for which the local agency’s governing body takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring that the land is surplus and is not necessary for the agency’s use. Land shall be declared either “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land,” as supported by written findings, before a local agency may take any action to dispose of it consistent with an agency’s policies or procedures. A local agency, on an annual basis, may declare multiple parcels as “surplus land” or “exempt surplus land.”
“Surplus land” includes land held in the Community Redevelopment Property Trust Fund pursuant to Section 34191.4 of the Health and Safety Code and land that has been designated in the long-range property management plan approved by the Department of Finance pursuant to Section 34191.5 of the Health and Safety Parcel Description must include the following:

1. APN: Enter the parcel number of the identified property.

2. Street Address/Intersection: Enter the street address of the property. If no street address is available, enter the

3. Existing Use: Select the existing use of the property. Use the drop-down menu to select one of the following op •Residential
•Commercial
•Industrial
•Public Facilities
•
Vacant
•Air Rights
•Other

4. Number of Units: If the existing use is residential, enter the number of units on the property.

5. Surplus Designation: Please identify if the property has been designated surplus or exempt surplus pursuant to Government Code section 54221, or excess pursuant to Government Code section 50569.

6. Parcel Size (in acres): Enter the parcel size in acres.

7. Notes (Optional): Please include any applicable notes providing additional property description. This could include description of any characteristics of the property.

Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant Reporting
Pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 50515.04, recipients of Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grants shall annually report by April 1 of the year following receipt of those funds on the status of proposed uses in the application. The report shall address the housing impact within the jurisdiction, including a summary of building permits, certificates of occupancy or other completed entitlements. Data sources may include the LEAP application (e.g., Attachment 1: Project Timeline and Budget), re-imbursement requests, other portions of the

1. Total Award Amount: Utilizing the LEAP application and award letter, fill in the total award amount for all proposed LEAP activities.

2. Task: Utilizing Attachment 1: Project Timeline and Budget from the LEAP application, fill in all project level tasks. Do not fill in sub-tasks. For example, an application might include a project level task to prepare and adopt a downtown specific plan. In this case, simply fill in downtown specific plan and do not fill in sub-tasks such as

3. $ Amount Awarded: Utilizing Attachment 1: Project Timeline and Budget from the LEAP application, fill in the total amount awarded for each project level task.
57 Agenda Item # 3.

4. $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested: Utilizing reimbursement requests sent to the Department, add up all requested amounts for each project level task. Note, this is reimbursement “requested” and not reimbursement “received”. At the time of reporting, some reimbursement requests may be in process. The table

5. Task Status: Provide a brief description of the status of project level tasks. This description should address recently completed, upcoming milestones, anticipated completion dates and any schedule slippage. In addition, task status may express progress as a percentage of completion (e.g., 50% complete).

6. Other Funding: Note any other funding sources by amount being utilized to complete each project level task.

If no other funding sources are being utilized, enter N/A. Examples of other funding includes SB 2 planning grants program, SB 1 sustainability planning grants program and local general funds.

7. Notes: Enter any other relevant information related to progress and impacts such as reasons for delays, anticipated numerical outcomes, etc.

8. Summary of Entitlements, Building Permits and Certificates of Occupancy: These tables will auto-populate 58 Agenda Item # 3.
59 Agenda Item # 3.
60 Agenda Item # 3.
61 Agenda Item # 3.
62 Agenda Item # 3.
63 Agenda Item # 3.
64 Agenda Item # 3.
65 Agenda Item # 3.
66 Agenda Item # 3.
67 Agenda Item # 3.
68 Agenda Item # 3.
69 Agenda Item # 3.
70 Agenda Item # 3.
71 Agenda Item # 3.
e closest known intersection.
72 Agenda Item # 3.

Frequently Asked Questions
Can I leave a row blank? Yes, you may leave blank rows in between rows that have information. However, you may not leave more than 10 rows in a row blank in between rows with information.

How do I delete rows? Click on a cell in the row(s) and type Ctrl-d.

Note: Macros must be enabled
Why are the rows not summing correctly? The summary tab and sum rows only include activities that occurred during the reporting year, according to the year entered in the "Start Here" tab.

Why are some cells highlighted yellow or green?
Yellow Cells: Required cells for each row become highlighted yellow once any cell in the row contains a character. The affordability descriptions become highlighted and required once any lower or moderate income units are entered into the form.

Green Cells: Cells highlighted green are where you indicate the number of units by affordability. This is required for any project in Table A. This is also required for the applicable sections (completed entitlement, issued building permits, issued certificates of occupancy) of Table A2. For example, if a project in Table A2 was issued a building permit, but not an entitlement or certificate of occupancy during the reporting year, you would enter the unit count in one of the green cells in the building permit section only. You may leave the other sections blank even though they are highlighted green, since they wouldn't apply to this example. Once a value is entered into this range, the range will no longer be highlighted green.

Why are the date cells highlighted red?
Cells can be highlighted red for two reasons:

Date cells: Sometimes, dates that are copied and pasted into this form are formatted as text. When pasting dates into the form please paste with the "match destination formatting" option. If the date cells are still highlighted red, they contain text. These must be converted to dates. To do so, open a blank workbook and paste in the dates that are formatted as text. In an adjacent column, enter the function =DATEVALUE and refer the function to the cell with date formatted as text.

This will result in a 5-digit number. Copy and paste these 5-digit numbers back into the APR form, then change the format of the cells to "Short Date" (i.e., 3/4/2012).

Text cells: Cells can also be highlighted red if the length of the text entered into the cell exceeds the character limit.

Can the same project be included in both Table A and Table A2? Yes. Table A tracks all applications for residential development that were received and deemed complete during the reporting year. Table A2 tracks all entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy for residential development that were issued in the reporting year. If a project was applied for and received entitlements, building permits, and/or certificates of occupancy during the reporting year, that project would be listed in both Table A and Table A2.

What if I have nothing to report? At minimum, the "Start Here" tab and Table D must be completed. If you have nothing to report in any of the other tables, please leave them blank, do NOT put N/A or something similar.

How do I correct or update the values in Table B? Table B contains data HCD has received from prior APR submittals as of October 6, 2020. If the numbers do not match your records, please contact HCD.

Do I need to take the form to my Council or Board prior to submitting the APR? Government Code section 65400 requires the planning agency to provide this report to the legislative body (i.e. local Council or Board), HCD, and OPR by April 1 of each year. The statute does not specify in which order they be provided, and HCD does not require the report to be submitted to the legislative body prior to submitting it to HCD.

Can I use this form for a prior year?
You can use this form for 2018 -2020. Make sure to change the reporting year in row 5 of the "Start Here" tab. Table G is not required for 2018. Table H and LEAP are not required for 2018-2019.

For the years 2017 and prior, you must use the old version of the APR. Please contact HCD at [email protected] to obtain.

Does submitting the Housing Element APR fulfill the requirements of submitting a General Plan APR? No. Government Code section 65400 requires jurisdictions to also submit a General Plan Annual Progress Report to OPR and HCD. These can be emailed to [email protected] and [email protected]
73 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v 2_15_2022
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import from. Project and program data will be copied exactly how it was entered in last year's form and must be updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.
1 North San Antonio Road
Los Altos
94022
Please Start Here
General Information
2021
Los Altos
Contact Information
Steve
Golden
Interim Planning Services Manager
[email protected]
6509472675
Mailing Address
Annual Progress Report January 2020
74 Agenda Item # 3.

Optional: This runs a macro which checks to ensure all required fields are filled out. The macro will create two files saved in the same directory this APR file is saved in. One file will be a copy of the APR with highlighted cells which require information. The other file will be list of the problematic cells, along with a description of the nature of the error.

Optional: Save before running. This copies data on Table A2, and creates another workbook with the table split across 4 tabs, each of which can fit onto a single page for easier printing. Running this macro will remove the comments on the column headers, which contain the instructions. Do not save the APR file after running in order to preserve comments once it is reopened.

Optional: This macro identifies dates entered that occurred outside of the reporting year. RHNA credit is only given for building permits issued during the reporting year.

Link to the online system: https://apr.hcd.ca.gov/APR/login.do Submittal Instructions
Please save your file as Jurisdictionname2021 (no spaces). Example: the city of San Luis Obispo would save their file as SanLuisObispo2021 Housing Element Annual Progress Reports (APRs) forms and tables must be submitted to HCD and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) on or before April 1 of each year for the prior calendar year; submit separate reports directly to both HCD and OPR pursuant to Government Code section 65400. There are two options for submitting APRs:

1. Online Annual Progress Reporting System - Please see the link to the online system to the left. This allows you to upload the completed APR form into directly into HCD’s database limiting the risk of errors. If you would like to use the online system, email [email protected] and HCD will send you the login information for your jurisdiction. Please note: Using the online system only provides the information to HCD. The APR must still be submitted to OPR. Their email address is [email protected].

2. Email - If you prefer to submit via email, you can complete the excel Annual Progress Report forms and submit to HCD at [email protected] and to OPR at [email protected]. Please send the Excel workbook, not a scanned or PDF copy of the tables.
75 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application
Status Notes
2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted+
(see
instructions)
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total PROPOSED
Units by Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

SUBMITTED
Pursuant to GC
65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Was a Density
Bonus requested
for this housing
development?
Was a Density
Bonus approved
for this housing
development?
Please indicate
the status of the
application.

Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 7 0 0 0 11 0 173 191 75 0 16741029 355 First St 355 First St DR 21-0003 5+ O 4/7/2021 3 4 43 50 No Yes N/A Pending 16741052 376 First St 376 First St D19-0009 5+ O 10/7/2021 3 12 15 No Yes N/A Pending 17039043 140 Lyell St 140 Lyell St D19-0007 2 to 4 O 2/23/2021 1 3 4 4 No No N/A Approved 16711041 4350 El Camino Real 4350 El Camino Real 19-D-01 5+ O 12/15/2021 3 4 40 47 No Yes N/A Pending 16741009 440 First St 440 First St D20-0004 2 to 4 O 5/12/2021 4 4 4 No No N/A Approved 19341024 1440 OAKHURST
AV 2019-1108654 ADU
O
10/2/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A
Approved
18914070 1460 AURA WAY ADU20-0021 ADU O 1/26/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18926054 741 SUNSHINE DR
ADU20-0023 ADU
O
6/11/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
19338019 1170 PAYNE DR ADU20-0033 ADU O 1/15/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18929029 747 ARROYO RD ADU20-0041 ADU O 2/2/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18948030 201 FREMONT
AVE ADU20-0043 ADU
O
6/16/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16723004 55 BELDEN DR ADU20-0047 ADU O 8/12/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 31811026 1811 WENRICK CT
ADU20-0053 ADU
O
2/4/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17027036 215 LYELL ST ADU20-0055 ADU O 7/21/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16735038 188 LOS ALTOS
AVE ADU20-0056 ADU
O
4/22/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17020076 693

HOLLINGSWORTH
DR ADU20-0057 ADU
O
2/3/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
31817023 1800 ALFORD AVE
ADU20-0059 ADU
O
5/12/2021
1 1 No No N/A
Pending
17043017 118 MERRITT CT ADU20-0062 ADU O 1/11/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19344019 1081 DARTMOUTH
LN ADU20-0063 ADU
O
1/30/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16743037 400 JUANITA WAY ADU21-0001 ADU O 2/19/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 31802056 1275

RICHARDSON AVE
ADU21-0002 ADU
O
5/7/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18936034 654 SPRINGER
TER ADU21-0003 ADU
O
3/10/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16717007 110 PASA ROBLES
AVE ADU21-0006 ADU
O
6/4/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17022039 270 SUNKIST LN ADU21-0008 ADU O 8/2/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18941043 918 ECHO DR ADU21-0009 ADU O 4/28/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18957004 251 COVINGTON RD ADU21-0010 ADU O 2/19/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19704050 1473 RAVENSWOOD DR ADU21-0012 ADU O 3/16/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 34208033 1240 MONTE VERDE CT ADU21-0014 ADU O 4/7/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19328002 1057 COVINGTON RD ADU21-0016 ADU O 4/15/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 17031011 121 DOUD DR ADU21-0017 ADU O 7/27/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18952060 520 BENVENUE
AVE ADU21-0018 ADU
O
8/3/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17026019 140 GORDON
WAY ADU21-0019 ADU
O
7/8/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18910012 1048 GOLDEN
WAY ADU21-0020 ADU
O
5/24/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16736025 72 VIEW ST ADU21-0021 ADU O 11/23/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 17517046 789 ORANGE AVE ADU21-0022 ADU O 5/25/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16710012 269 LANGTON
AVE ADU21-0024 ADU
O
7/19/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18937068 698 SAN MARTIN
PL ADU21-0025 ADU
O
6/26/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17026078 230 VALLEY ST ADU21-0026 ADU O 10/21/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18941051 853 CAMPBELL
AVE ADU21-0027 ADU
O
6/29/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18909051 951 SEENA AVE ADU21-0028 ADU O 8/27/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16723010 678 TOMI LEA ST ADU21-0029 ADU O 5/28/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 17515014 581 UNIVERSITY
AVE ADU21-0030 ADU
O
10/4/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17022024 283 SUNKIST LN ADU21-0031 ADU O 12/1/2021 1 1 No No N/A Pending 18918001 817 BERRY AVE ADU21-0032 ADU O 7/20/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18950044 494 ROSITA AVE ADU21-0033 ADU O 6/2/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 33602058 812 NASH RD ADU21-0034 ADU O 6/3/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19719104 1365 GRANT RD ADU21-0035 ADU O 6/16/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19705016 1745 SELIG LN ADU21-0036 ADU O 8/13/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16733051 370 YERBA SANTA
AVE ADU21-0037 ADU
O
8/2/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
19703009 1640 ELMHURST
DR ADU21-0038 ADU
O
6/25/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17014019 730 VERA CRUZ
AVE ADU21-0039 ADU
O
8/18/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18935066 40 SPRINGER RD ADU21-0040 ADU O 6/23/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18911014 1035 RUSSELL
AVE ADU21-0041 ADU
O
6/24/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18939010 633 ARBOLEDA
DR ADU21-0044 ADU
O
11/30/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
19345016 1160 RUNNYMEAD
DR ADU21-0045 ADU
O
12/20/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus Applications
10 76
Agenda Item # 3.

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 7 0 0 0 11 0 173 191 75 0 Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus Applications
10 19703038 1706 OAK AVE ADU21-0048 ADU O 6/21/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19343011 1243 CARMEL TER
ADU21-0049 ADU
O
7/22/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18953042 468 HAWTHORNE
AVE ADU21-0050 ADU
O
12/7/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17026048 214 EDITH AVE ADU21-0052 ADU O 10/25/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19327043 960 HAYMAN PL ADU21-0053 ADU O 9/20/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 17011024 660 DISTEL DR ADU21-0054 ADU O 8/12/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16714004 1031 ESTRELLITA
WAY ADU21-0055 ADU
O
10/25/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
19340022 1550 OAKHURST
AVE ADU21-0058 ADU
O
9/24/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16722014 168 West Portola
Avenue ADU21-0060 ADU
O
8/27/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18914089 944 AURA WAY ADU21-0061 ADU O 9/22/2021 1 1 No No N/A Pending 17043023 20 ANGELA DR ADU21-0062 ADU O 9/10/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16724026 275 VERNAL CT ADU21-0064 ADU O 9/3/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 34203046 552 SEQUOIA DR ADU21-0066 ADU O 12/7/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 31802042 1210 FREMONT
AVE ADU21-0067 ADU
O
12/13/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17027028 318 GORDON
WAY ADU21-0068 ADU
O
10/8/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18929052 789 RAYMUNDO
AVE ADU21-0073 ADU
O
9/21/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
18946035 1052 ECHO DR ADU21-0074 ADU O 10/7/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 19716027 1544 KATHY LN ADU21-0075 ADU O 11/12/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 18953033 425 BENVENUE
AVE ADU21-0076 ADU
O
11/18/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
31823016 1730 HOLT AVE ADU21-0094 ADU O 12/1/2021 1 1 No No N/A Pending 19341023 1450 MCKENZIE
AVE ADU21-0095 ADU
O
12/22/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
77 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
2 3 5 6 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=Renter
O=Owner
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued
Entitlements
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Building Permits
Date Issued
# of Units Issued
Building Permits
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome
Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions)
Date Issued
# of Units
issued
Certificates of
Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
How many of
the units were
Extremely Low
Income?+
Was Project
APPROVED using
GC 65913.4(b)?
(SB 35
Streamlining)
Y/N
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select
multiple - see
instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Des
troyed Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/D
estroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied
to the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 1 0 0 1 0 13 57 72 0 3 2 19 6 31 58 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 0 1 0 16741019 425 FIRST STREE 425 FIRST STREET BLD19-01450 5+ O 0 1 2 17 4/1/2021 20 0 N Y INC 55
1 Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
16741066 389 FIRST STREE 389 FIRST STREET BLD19-01769 5+ O 0 1 9 3/8/2021 10 0 N Y DB, INC 55 3
Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
16741078 450 FIRST STREE 450 FIRST STREET BLD20-00925 5+ O 0 1 3 23 11/2/2021 27 0 N Y DB, INC 55 4
Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
19341024 1440 OAKHURST AV UNIT A 2019-671564
ADU O
0 1
9/29/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18936042 689 RIVIERA DR BLD19-00872
ADU O
0 1
9/1/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17028025 21 A OSAGE AVE BLD19-01797
ADU O
0 1
5/19/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
34209023 1280 EVA AVE BLD20-00503
ADU O
0 1
5/7/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
31801028 1650 JOLLY CT BLD20-00950
ADU O
0 1
2/18/2021
1 1 5/4/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18938002 606 A PACO DR BLD20-01027
ADU O
0 1
1/11/2021
1 1 12/9/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17037006 166 A LYELL ST BLD20-01134
ADU O
0 1
1/19/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16742010 561 GUADALUPE DR BLD20-01135
ADU O
0 1
3/26/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19719002 1448 A MIRAVALLE AVE BLD20-01231
ADU O
0 1
7/15/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17003007 261 A PORTOLA CT BLD20-01317
ADU O
0 1
7/28/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17020008 633 A SPARGUR DR BLD20-01367
ADU O
0 1
4/21/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19328009 1000 A ALEGRE AVE BLD20-01394
ADU O
0 1
5/27/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18936030 626 A SPRINGER TER BLD20-01419
ADU O
0 1
2/10/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19340025 1075 FREMONT AVE UNIT A BLD20-01466
ADU O
0 1
9/23/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18940017 682 A ARBOLEDA DR BLD20-01493
ADU O
0 1
6/2/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16730042 140 A HAMILTON CT BLD20-01494
ADU O
0 1
6/14/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16713002 1052 A MERCEDES AVE BLD20-01518
ADU O
0 1
6/4/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19718055 1401 A MARINOVICH WAY BLD20-01520
ADU O
0 1
4/15/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16729051 119 CORONADO AVE Unit A BLD20-01535
ADU O
0 1
2/24/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17040080 77 A LYELL STREET BLD20-01553
ADU O
0 1
3/1/2021
1 1 9/15/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17040080 67 A LYELL ST BLD20-01556
ADU O
0 1
3/1/2021
1 1 9/15/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
31802056 1275 RICHARDSON AVE BLD20-01583
ADU O 1
5/7/2021 1
1 3/18/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
31818074 1694 BEN ROE AVENUE UNIT A BLD20-01636
ADU O
0 1
5/20/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16724012 265 PINE LANE BLD20-01658
ADU O
0 1
1/7/2021
1 1 3/18/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17011010 645 A LOS NINOS WAY BLD20-01693
ADU O
0 1
5/11/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16712033 1023 MERCEDES AVENUE UNIT A BLD21-00046
ADU O
0 1
4/27/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17026014 226 FRANCES DR UNIT A BLD21-00048
ADU O
0 1
8/11/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19342038 1359 A MCKENZIE AVE BLD21-00060
ADU O
0 1
4/8/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16727079 575 A LOS ALTOS AVE BLD21-00061
ADU O
0 1
6/21/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19339034 1345 OAKHURST AVENUE UNIT A BLD21-00077
ADU O
0 1
6/3/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17043017 118 A MERRITT CT BLD21-00086
ADU O 1
1/11/2021 1
1 7/15/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18914070 1460 AURA WAY UNIT A BLD21-00130
ADU O 1
1/26/2021 1
1 9/29/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18929029 747 A ARROYO RD BLD21-00182
ADU O 1
2/2/2021 1
1 5/7/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18939021 495 A ARBOLEDA DR BLD21-00230
ADU O
0 1
6/2/2021
1 1 12/13/2021 1 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17022045 231 A ALICIA WAY BLD21-00271
ADU O
0 1
6/28/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16733020 362 A YERBA BUENA AVE BLD21-00305
ADU O
0 1
2/25/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
31811026 1811 A WENRICK CT BLD21-00349
ADU O 1
2/4/2021 1
1 5/27/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16743037 400 A JUANITA WAY BLD21-00398
ADU O 1
2/19/2021 1
1 8/3/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18957004 251 COVINGTON RD Unit A BLD21-00424
ADU O 1
2/19/2021 1
1 8/30/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19704050 1473 RAVENSWOOD DR BLD21-00442
ADU O 1
3/16/2021 1
1 6/17/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18937054 699 SAN MARTIN PL UNIT A BLD21-00477
ADU O
0 1
11/30/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18936034 654 A SPRINGER TER BLD21-00493
ADU O 1
3/10/2021 1
1 7/13/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
34208033 1240 MONTE VERDE CT BLD21-00553
ADU O 1
4/7/2021 1
1 7/7/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16718082 831 A LOS ALTOS AVE BLD21-00627
ADU O 1
1/15/2021 1
1 8/10/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19328002 1057 COVINGTON RD UNIT A BLD21-00665
ADU O
0 1
10/8/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17013009 99 A E PORTOLA AVE BLD21-00701
ADU O 1
4/15/2021 1
1 5/5/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
31802056 1275 RICHARDSON AVE UNIT A BLD21-00787
ADU O
0 1
8/11/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19328009 1000 A ALEGRE AVE BLD21-00861
ADU O 1
5/7/2021 1
1 5/27/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16735038 188 LOS ALTOS AVE Unit A BLD21-00898
ADU O
0 1
11/22/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
19719104 1365 GRANT RD BLD21-01041
ADU O 1
4/22/2021 1
1 9/22/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18914083 990 AURA WAY BLD21-01086
ADU O 1
6/16/2021 1
1 11/17/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16717007 110 PASA ROBLES AVE UNIT A BLD21-01113
ADU O
0 1
10/27/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18935066 40 S SPRINGER RD BLD21-01130
ADU O 1
6/4/2021 1
1 9/22/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18911014 1035 RUSSELL AVE BLD21-01171
ADU O 1
6/23/2021 1
1 12/20/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18930008 755 A VISTA GRANDE AVE BLD21-01175
ADU O 1
6/24/2021 1
1 7/13/2021
1 0 N Y
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
Density Bonus
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy 4 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Project Identifier Demolished/Destroyed Units (CCR Title 25 §6202)
78 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
19703038 1706 OAK AVE UNIT A BLD21-01186
ADUO
0 1
11/2/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
16723010 678 TOMI LEA ST UNIT A BLD21-01271
ADUO1
6/21/20211
1 11/10/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17031011 121 DOUD DR UNIT A BLD21-01328
ADUO1
5/28/20211
1 10/28/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17518054 761 UNIVERSITY AVE UNIT A BLD21-01645
ADUO1
7/27/20211
1 9/24/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
34207016 1985 LAVER CT UNIT A BLD21-01774
ADUO
0 1
10/20/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17021050 215 VERANO DR UNIT A BLD21-01920
ADUO
0 1
11/15/2021
10NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
17036029 321 Edna Court 2019-671575 ADU
O
0 01
11/18/2021
1NY
Assigned affordability based
ABAG Recommendation for
AFFH
5%VL/30%L/50%M/15%AM
18948014 200 COVINGTON RD BLD19-00089 ADU
O001 1/12/20211NY
17511047 13 CYPRESS CT BLD19-00310 ADUO
0 01 4/15/2021
1N
Y
17517058 672 PALM AVE BLD19-00843 ADU
O
0 01 4/14/20211NY
17040016 49 LYELL ST BLD19-01029 ADU
O
0 01 1/12/20211NY
18936068 601 HAWTHORNE AVE BLD19-01193 ADU
O001 1/14/20211NY
19716056 1544A MARLBAROUGH AVE BLD19-01777 ADU
O001 1/6/2021
1NY
17020005 659 SPARGUR DR BLD19-01795 ADU
O001 1/27/20211NY
17040080 77 LYELL ST BLD19-01831 SFDO001 9/16/20211NY
18936036 668 A SPRINGER TER BLD20-00120 ADU
O001 10/14/2021
1NY
19338036 1194 PAYNE DR BLD20-00310 ADU
O001 9/9/20211NY
16735074 170 LOS ALTOS AVE BLD20-00492 ADUO0
01 11/17/20211NY
17022053 335 ALICIA WAY BLD20-00552 ADUO001 7/16/2021
1NY
16723102 15 MAY LN BLD20-00579 ADU
O
0 01 11/9/20211NY
17027006 330 Waverly Court BLD20-00761 ADU
O
0 01 5/21/20211NY
19703026 1621 A PINEHURST DR BLD20-00924 ADU
O001 8/17/2021
1N
Y
17021046 258A VERANO DR BLD20-01021 ADUO001 8/17/20211NY 17039043 140 Lyell St 140 Lyell St D19-0007 2 to 4
O
13 2/23/2021
4 00NY DB, INC 551 DemolishedO2
Development
Standards
Modification
Yes
19338019 1170 PAYNE DR BLD21-00577 ADU
O1 2/18/202111 9/28/202110NY
18926054 741 SUNSHINE DR ADU20-0023 ADU
O1 6/11/20211
00NY
18948030 201 FREMONT AVE ADU20-0043 ADUO1 6/16/2021
100NY
16723004 55 BELDEN DR ADU20-0047 ADUO1 8/12/2021100NY
17027036 215 LYELL ST ADU20-0055 ADUO1 7/21/2021100NY
17020076 693 HOLLINGSWORTH DR ADU20-0057 ADUO1 2/3/2021100NY 19344019 1081 DARTMOUTH LN ADU20-0063 ADU
O1 1/30/2021100NY
17022039 270 SUNKIST LN ADU21-0008 ADU
O1 8/2/2021100NY
18941043 918 ECHO DR ADU21-0009 ADU
O1 4/28/20211
00 NY
18952060 520 BENVENUE AVE ADU21-0018 ADU
O1 8/3/20211
00NY
17026019 140 GORDON WAY ADU21-0019 ADUO1 7/8/2021
100NY
18910012 1048 GOLDEN WAY ADU21-0020 ADUO1 5/24/2021
100NY
16736025 72 VIEW ST ADU21-0021 ADU
O1 11/23/20211
00NY
17517046 789 ORANGE AVE ADU21-0022 ADUO1 5/25/2021
100NY
16710012 269 LANGTON AVE ADU21-0024 ADUO1 7/19/2021100NY 18937068 698 SAN MARTIN PL ADU21-0025 ADUO1 6/26/2021100NY 17026078 230 VALLEY ST ADU21-0026 ADUO1 10/21/2021100NY 18941051 853 CAMPBELL AVE ADU21-0027 ADU
O1 6/29/2021100NY
18909051 951 SEENA AVE ADU21-0028 ADU
O1 8/27/2021100NY
17515014 581 UNIVERSITY AVE ADU21-0030 ADU
O1 10/4/20211
00 NY
18918001 817 BERRY AVE ADU21-0032 ADUO1 7/20/2021
10 0NY
18950044 494 ROSITA AVE ADU21-0033 ADU
O1 6/2/2021100NY
33602058 812 NASH RD ADU21-0034 ADUO1 6/3/2021100NY
19705016 1745 SELIG LN ADU21-0036 ADUO1 8/13/2021100NY
16733051 370 YERBA SANTA AVE ADU21-0037 ADUO1 8/2/2021100NY 19703009 1640 ELMHURST DR ADU21-0038 ADU
O1 6/25/2021100NY
17014019 730 VERA CRUZ AVE ADU21-0039 ADU
O1 8/18/2021100NY
18939010 633 ARBOLEDA DR ADU21-0044 ADU
O1 11/30/2021100NY
19345016 1160 RUNNYMEAD DR ADU21-0045 ADU
O1 12/20/20211
00NY
19343011 1243 CARMEL TER ADU21-0049 ADUO1 7/22/2021
100NY
18953042 468 HAWTHORNE AVE ADU21-0050 ADUO1 12/7/2021100NY 17026048 214 EDITH AVE ADU21-0052 ADUO1 10/25/2021100NY 19327043 960 HAYMAN PL ADU21-0053 ADUO1 9/20/2021100NY
17011024 660 DISTEL DR ADU21-0054 ADU
O1 8/12/2021100NY
16714004 1031 ESTRELLITA WAY ADU21-0055 ADU
O1 10/25/2021100NY
19340022 1550 OAKHURST AVE ADU21-0058 ADU
O1 9/24/2021100
NY
16722014 168 West Portola Avenue ADU21-0060 ADU
O1 8/27/20211
00NY
17043023 20 ANGELA DR ADU21-0062 ADU
O1 9/10/20211
00NY
16724026 275 VERNAL CT ADU21-0064 ADUO1 9/3/2021
100NY
34203046 552 SEQUOIA DR ADU21-0066 ADUO1 12/7/2021100NY 31802042 1210 FREMONT AVE ADU21-0067 ADUO1 12/13/2021100NY 17027028 318 GORDON WAY ADU21-0068 ADU
O1 10/8/2021100NY
18929052 789 RAYMUNDO AVE ADU21-0073 ADU
O1 9/21/2021100NY
18946035 1052 ECHO DR ADU21-0074 ADU
O1 10/7/2021100N
Y
19716027 1544 KATHY LN ADU21-0075 ADU
O1 11/12/20211
00NY
18953033 425 BENVENUE AVE ADU21-0076 ADUO1 11/18/2021
100NY
19341023 1450 MCKENZIE AVE ADU21-0095 ADU
O1 12/22/2021100NY
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
79 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
80 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
81 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
0 00
000
000
0 00
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
00 0
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
82 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Date of Rezone Rezone Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+ Date of Rezone Very Low-Income Low-Income Moderate-Income Above ModerateIncome Rezone Type Parcel Size
(Acres)
General Plan
Designation Zoning Minimum Density Allowed
Maximum
Density Allowed
Realistic
Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing Uses
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
3 8
Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
83 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 3 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation Program 1.1.1 – Implement
voluntary code inspection
program.

Provide voluntary inspections On-going Continue to implement Program 1.1.2 – Help
secure funding for
housing assistance
programs.

Help secure funding for housing
assistance On-going Continue to implement, CDBG funds transferred to County Program 1.2.1 – Support
rezoning from office to
medium-density
multifamily.

Support rezoning from office to multiplefamily On-going Continue to implement, no requests received to date Program 1.3.1 – Enforce
neighborhood residential
buffering.

Provide appropriate buffers On-going
Continue to implement, recent discussions with Commission and Council -actively applying these standards to projest sites where there is this relationship between uses.

Program 1.3.2 – Restrict
commercial uses in
residential neighborhoods.

Restrict commercial land uses in
residential areas On-going Continue to implement
Program 1.4.1 – Implement
zoning and design
standards.

Implement appropriate zoning and
design standards On-going Continue to implement
Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
84 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 1.4.2 – Evaluate
design review process. Evaluate design review processes On-going Continue to implement, added story pole requirement, 3D renderings, enhanced on-site posting notices with graphics Program 1.4.3 – Facilitate
alternate modes of
transportation in
residential neighborhoods.

Facilitate alternative transportation
modes On-going Implemented
Program 1.4.4 –
Accommodate the needs
of children through design
review and land use
regulations, including
open space, parks and
recreation facilities,
pathways, play yards, etc.

Accommodate the needs of children in
development On-going Continue to implement, currently have adopted open space standards, both common and private for multiple-family projects in the CT zone district Program 1.5.1 – Review
compatibility of land
divisions as part of the
permit review and
approval process.

Review land use compatibility of
subdivisions On-going Continue to implement
Program 2.1.1 – Encourage
diversity of housing. Encourage housing diversity On-going Multi-Family Residential Projects approved with a mix of ownership and rental BMR's that demonstrates housing diversity
Program 2.1.2 – Implement
multifamily district
development standards.

Require maximum density of multiplefamily projects On-going Continue to implement Program 2.1.3 – Allow
employee housing
Allow employee housing for agricultural
uses Pending Outstanding - given limited agricultural operations in the City Program 2.2.1 – Provide
development incentives
for mixed-use projects in
commercial districts.

Provide development incentives for
mixed-use projects 12/16/2019 Continue to implement, have adopted changes to the CT District regulations to clarify density bonus incentives
85 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 2.3.1 – Implement
density bonuses. Implement density bonuses On-going
Continue to implement - Density Bonus projects have been approved and continue to be submitted. Density bonus ordinance amendment underway to be in compliance with state law.

Program 3.1.1 – Support
efforts to fund homeless
services.

Facilitate and help pursue funding for
homelessness services Ongoing Continue to implement, transfer CDBG funding to the County Program 3.1.2 – Continue
to participate in local and
regional forums for
homelessness, supportive,
and transitional housing.

Participate in regional forums for
homelessness, supportive and
transitional housing
On-going Continue to implement, transfer CDBG funding to the County Program 3.2.1 – Amend the
City’s Zoning Ordinance to
accommodate emergency
shelters.

Amend zoning code for emergency
shelters 5/1/2015 Implemented June 2015 with code amendment Program 3.2.2 – Recognize
the statutory requirements
for transitional and
supportive housing.

Recognize transitional and supportive
housing 5/1/2015 Implemented June 2015 with code amendment Program 3.2.3 – Provide
incentives and amend the
City’s Zoning Ordinance
for compliance with
statutory requirements for
single-room-occupancy
residences to address the
needs of extremely low
income households
Provide incentives and amend code to
allow SRO for extremely-low income
households
5/15/2019 Implemented June 2015 with code amendment
Program 4.1.1 – Monitor
condominium conversion. Monitor condo conversions On-going Continue to implement 86 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 4.1.2: Conserve
small houses in areas of
small lot sizes.

Conserve small houses in small-lot
districts On-going Continue to implement
Program 4.2.1 – Facilitate
new construction of
second dwelling units.

Facilitate new accessory dwelling units On-going Adopted amendment to ADU ordinance October 2020 in conformance with state laws and continue to implement.

Program 4.2.2 – Study the
feasibility of reducing
minimum lot sizes for
second living units.

Consider reducing lot size minimum for
accessory dwellings 1/1/2016
Code amendment adopted in 2018. ADU ordinance amendment adopted October 2020 is in compliance with state law which does not have a minimum lot size for ADUs
Program 4.3.1 – Assist in
the development of
affordable housing.

Help develop affordable housing On-going Continue to implement, transfer CDBG funding to the County, explain the density bonus process and affordable housing requirements to developers Program 4.3.2 – Implement
Chapter 14.28 of the
Municipal Code, which
defines the number of
required below-market-rate
(BMR) units by
development size and
type, and requires on
larger projects (greater
than 10 market-rate units)
that the BMR units
generally reflect the size
and number of bedrooms
of the market rate units
Implement BMR housing regulations On-going
Continue to implement as amended in 2018 to require 15% affordability for projects having 5-9 units and increase the percentage of affordable units in projects having 10 or more units from 15% to 20% for low income in rental proejects and from 10% to 15% for very low income rental projects and increase the percentage of BMR units in an ownership project from 10% to 15% with the majority of the units affordable to moderate income households.

Program 4.3.3 –Consider
reduced parking
requirements for certain
housing types and
affordable housing units.

Consider reduced parking for affordable
housing On-going
The City's Density Bonus ordinance was amended to implement State Density Bonus law with regard to reduced parking ratios and elimination of guest parking.

The City's Density Bonus Law is currently being updated to reflect additional changes to state laws with regards to reduced parking ratios allowed. 87 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 4.3.4 – Continue
to encourage maximum
densities.

Encourage max density Annually Continue to implement
Program 4.3.5 – Initiate an
affordable housing
administration contract
review and renewal.

Initiate affordable housing
administrative contract renewal 7/1/2015 Agreement with Palo Alto Housing finalized in 2018 and they now serve as housing provider.

Program 4.3.6 – Improve
the City’s BMR program
priority ranking process.

Evaluate the application priority ranking
process
7/1/2015 Implemented March 2015, revised priority list to merge Los Altos residents and those employed within the City limits as a second priority Program 4.3.7 – Consider a
commercial development
linkage fee for affordable
housing.

Consider Affordable housing linkage
fees 1/16/2019 Adopted a commercial development linkage fee in 2018.

Program 5.1.1 – Assist
residents with housing
discrimination and
landlord-tenant
complaints.

Assist residents with housing and
discrimination, and landlord-tenant
issues
On-going Continue to implement
Program 6.1.1 –
Discourage senior-only
housing from converting
to other uses.

Discourage conversion of senior-only
projects On-going Continue to implement
Program 6.1.2 – Assist
seniors to maintain and
rehabilitate their homes.

Assist seniors to maintain and
rehabilitate their homes On-going Continue to implement, created a handout on Age Friendly Design Elements Program 6.1.3 – Encourage
conforming and contextual
senior housing near
transportation and
services.

Encourage senior housing near transit
and services On-going Continue to implement
88 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 6.2.1 – Provide
senior housing density
bonuses and development
incentives.

Provide senior housing density bonuses
and development incentives On-going Continue to implement Program 6.2.2 – Designate
and encourage senior
housing on specific wellsuited sites.

Designate and encourage senior
housing on well-suited sites On-going Continue to implement Program 6.2.3 – Mixed-use
development, including
developments that contain
senior and institutional
housing, will be
encouraged in public and
quasi-public land use
areas that are zoned PCF.

Encourage mixed-use developments
that contain senior On-going Continue to implement
Program 6.2.4 – Senior
housing with extended
care facilities will be
allowed in multifamily and
mixed-use zoning districts.

Allow senior extended care in multifamily and mixed-use districts On-going Continue to implement Program 7.1.1 – Promote
energy and water
conservation through
education and awareness
campaigns.

Promote energy and water conservation On-going Staff and the Environmental Commission continue to implement Program 7.1.2 – Participate
in a Property Assessed
Clean Energy (PACE)
financing program.

Participate in PACE financing On-going City adopted a Resolution supporting PACE programs Program 7.1.3 – Promote
the use of solar energy. Promote solar energy On-going Continue to implement and as required by Green Building and Title-24 Building requirements. 89 Agenda Item # 3.

Program 7.2.1 – Implement
energy-efficient
regulations.

Implement energy efficiency regulations On-going Continue to implement and as required by Green Building and Title-24 Building requirements.

Program 7.2.2 – Monitor
and implement thresholds
and statutory requirements
of climate change
legislation.

Monitor and implement climate change
legislation On-going
Staff continues to implement including the City’s Climate Action Plan. A new Climate Action Plan is currently under development and anticipated to be adopted in 2022.

Program 8.1.1 – Develop
annual housing status
report.

Develop annual housing status reports Annually Staff continues to implement Program 8.2.1 – Participate
in the regional housing
needs determination.

Participate in Regional Housing Needs
Determinations On-going Staff continues to implement
90 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report January 2020
91 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) Extremely LowIncome+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+Extremely LowIncome+Very LowIncome+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Rehabilitation Activity
Preservation of Units At-Risk
Acquisition of Residential Units
Mobilehome Park Preservation
Total Units by Income
Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields. The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code
Section 65583.1+
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report January 2020
92 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos
Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
2 3 4
APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic Capacity
Identified in the
Housing Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
NOTE: This table must only be filled out if the housing element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting year.
93 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 01/31/2015 - 01/31/2023
Current Year
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 3
Deed Restricted 2
Non-Deed Restricted 19
Deed Restricted 6
Non-Deed Restricted 31
58 119
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 0 0 1
2 to 4 4 0 0
5+ 0 57 0
ADU 68 62 22
MH 0 0 0
Total 72 119 23
76 191
75 0
0 0
0 0
Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 0 0
Low 0 0 0
Moderate 0 0 0
Above Moderate 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
94 Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos
Reporting Period 2021
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
1 2 3 4
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPO
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
For Santa Clara County jurisdictions, please format the APN's as 95 Agenda Item # 3.
96 Agenda Item # 3.
97 Agenda Item # 3.
98 Agenda Item # 3.
99 Agenda Item # 3.

Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Cells in grey contain
auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
5 6 7
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
ORT
s follows:999-99-999
100
Agenda Item # 3.
101
Agenda Item # 3.
102
Agenda Item # 3.
103
Agenda Item # 3.
104
Agenda Item # 3.

Jurisdiction Los Altos
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount
Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement
Requested
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Tab Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted

Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the c 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
$
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
105
Agenda Item # 3.

Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Deed Restricted
Non-Deed Restricted
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
106
Agenda Item # 3.

Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26. ble A2)
Current Year
1 0
0 1
0 13
57 72
Current Year
0 3
2 19

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the -
Task Status
107
Agenda Item # 3.
6 31
58 119
Current Year
0 0
0 0
0 0
23 23
108
Agenda Item # 3.

Other
Funding Notes
e eligible uses specified in Section
109
Agenda Item # 3.

APPROVED
Units by project
Total

DISAPPROVED
Units by Project
Was APPLICATION

APPROVED
16723004 55 BELDEN DR ADU20-0047 ADU O 8/12/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 31811026 1811 WENRICK CT
ADU20-0053 ADU
O
2/4/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17027036 215 LYELL ST ADU20-0055 ADU O 7/21/2021 1 1 1 No No N/A APPROVED 16735038 188 LOS ALTOS
AVE ADU20-0056 ADU
O
4/22/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
17020076 693

HOLLINGSWORTH
DR ADU20-0057 ADU
O
2/3/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
16743037 400 JUANITA WAY
ADU21-0001 ADU
O
2/19/2021
1 1 1 No No N/A

APPROVED
31802056 1275