Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Los Banos City Council
January 5, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
January 5, 2022
Body
Los Banos City Council
Pages
34
Original file
226.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on losbanos.org. That file is the official record.

AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
PM2.5 . Total
Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM
C02e
Hauling :: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : •• I I I I I I I I I , • I I I I
..... ------.-------~-------,-------,-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------~------- Vendor 0.7379 I 22.4299 I 5.1232 0.0566 I 1.3766 I 0.0707 I 1.4473 0.3964 0.0676 0.4640 t . 5,918.336 I 5,91 8.336 I 0.6248 • 5,933.957 I I , I 8 : 8 : : 0 •• • I I I I I I I • " I • It. ----- ------__ ------~------~-------~------~------~------~------,-------,-------T-------. -- -~------T_------,-------,-------~------- Worker 2.3072 1.6456 I 15.6450 I 0.0393 4.2799 0.0316 4.3115 1.1 352 0.0291 1.1644 + • 3,909.996 I 3,909.996 I 0.1 209 ' 3,913.019 i . 7 I 7 I I 2 Total 3.0451
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG 1 1 Fugitive I EOx haust 1 PM10
PM10 PM10 Total
NOx CO S02
Category Ib/day
Off·Road 1.9009 I 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586
Total

1. 9009 1 17.4321 16.5752 1 0.0269

0. 95861 0.9586
Fugitive 1 ExhaUst
PM2.S PM2.5

0.9013
1 0.9013
PM2.5
: Total
,
Blo· C02 I NBio· C02 I Total C02 I CH4
Ib/day

0.9013 0.0000' 2,553.363 I 2,553.363 I 0.6160 I
I 9 : 9 :
2,553.363 12,553.363
9 9

0.9013 0.0000 0.6160
N20
9,846.976
2 C02e
I 2,568.764
I 3
2,568.764
3 350
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County. Winter

3.5 Building Construction - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx U
Category
S02 Fugitive
PM10
Ib/day
PM10 j Tota l
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust 1
PM2.5
PM2.5
Tota l
Bio- C02 I NBio- CO~I :tal C02 j CH4 N20 I C02e
Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ~ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I •• I I I I I I I I I , I I • I I
-------- -- -~-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------.-------I-------,-------,-------,-------T------- Vendor 0.7379 ' 22.4299 '5.1232 0.0566 1.3766 0.0707 1.4473 0.3964 0.0676 0.4640 I . 5,918.336 ' 5,918.336 ' 0.6248 ' 5,933.957 : I , ' 8 I 8 : : 0 . , I I I I I I I I I , I I I I 1 --------- -~-------,-------,-------,-------~------,-------T-------~------T_------~-------~-------I-------,-------,-------~------T------- Worke r 2.3072 1.6456 ' 15.6450 '0.0393 4.2799 0.0316 4.311 5 1.1352 0.0291 1.1644 II • 3,909.996 ' 3,909.996' 0.1209 ' 3,913.01 9 , 1 7 I 7 • I 2 Total 3.0451 I 24.0755 1 20.7682 1 0.0959 1 5.6565 1 0_1023 J 5.7588 1 ,·5317

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG ·
Category
Off-Road -. 1.7062 ' 15.6156 16.3634
"
Total

0.0269 0.8090 0.8090

0.0967 J 1.6284
PM2.5
Total
, 0.7612 , 0.7612
I
4 4

9.828.333 1 9.828.333 1 0.7457 J 9.84~.976
C02e
Ib/day
• 2,554.333 ' 2,554.333 ' 0.6120 , , 2,569.632 , 6 , 6 , , 2

2.569.632
2 351
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
RaG 1 NOx co
Category Ib y
PM10
Total Fugitive 1 Exhaust I PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Blo- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02 I CH4 N20 I C02e
Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 : _, I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I
-----------.-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------~------- Vendor 0.6800 • 21.2390 • 4.6437 0.0561 1.3766 0.0615 1.4381 0.3964 0.0588 0.4552! • 5,862.596 • 5,862.596' 0.6089 • • 5,877.81 8 I : i : 9 1 9 I : 4 •• • • • t • , I I • , • • • I • ------- Work ---n-------,-------,-------,-------~------~------,-------,-------,-------T-------.- -----~------,-------,_------,-------~------- er 2.1296 1.4686 ' 14.2208 • 0.0379 4.2799 0.0305 4.3104 1.1 352 0.0281 1.1633 II • 3,769.989' 3,769.989 I 0.1078 1 3,772.685 I I 3 I 3 : I 2
I
Total 2_8096 1 22.7075 18.8644 1 0.0939 I 5.6565 1 0.0920 I 5.7485 1.5317 1 0.0869 1 1.6186 9'63~_586 9'63~.586 1 0.7167 1 9'65~.503 Mitiaated Construction On-Site
RaG PM2.5 .C02e
Total
Category
Off-Road .. 1.7062 15.61 56 I 16.3634 I 0.0269 I 0.8090 I 0.8090 . I 0.7612 I 0.7612 0.0000 • 2,554.333 I 2,554.333 • 0.6120 I 2,569.632 . 6 I 6 . I 2 Total 2,569.632
2 352
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
RaG I NOx I co I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM1 0
PM10 . PM10 Total
Category Ib/day
Fugitive Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
610' C02 I NBio· C02 I Total C02 I CH4 N20 C02e
Ib/day
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . , •• I I I I • I I I I , • I I I I ........................ _______ ., _______ ., _______ ., _______ ., _______ ., _______ ., _____ --.,-------.,-------.,...-------.............. -I-------.,-------.,-------.,-------T .............. I Vendor 0.6800 • 21.2390 • 4.6437 0.0561 I 1.3766 I 0.0615 1.4381 I 0.3964 0.0588 0.4552', . 5,862.596 I 5,862.596 I 0.6089 '5,877.818 I I I I 9 I 9 I I 4 _. I I I I I I , I I , I • I • •
.... -- .... -.. ---~-------.,-------.,-------.,-------~------.,-------T-------.,-------T-------.,...-------"*-- .. ----I-------,-------.,-------~------"T------- Worker 2.1296 1.4686 14.2208 0.0379 I 4.2799 0.0305 4.3104 1.1352 0,0281 1.1633 i . 3.769.989 I 3,769.989 I 0.1078 13,772.685 i I 3 I 3 I I 2 Total II 2.80961 22.7075 118.8644 I 0.0939 I 5.6565 I 0.0920 { 5.7485 1.5317 I 0.0869 1.6186 , 9,632.586 19,632.586
2 2

0.7167 9,650.503
6 3.6 Paving - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category
RaG PM2,5 C02e
Total
Off.Road 1.1028 I 11.1249 I 14.5805 I 0.0228 I I 0,5679 I 0.5679 I I 0.5225 0.5225', . 2,207.660 I 2,207.660 I 0,7140 I 12.225.510 I I I I I I I I ,I 3 I 3: I : 4 •• I • I I I I I I I I: I I • • I
--- .... -- .. ---~-------~-------T_------,-------,-------,-------,-------T_------T_------~-------.--~~~~~I-------,-------T_------T_------T------- Paving .. 0.0000 I 0.0000 • 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 t 0.0000 I I 0.0000 , &
Total 2,225.510
4 353
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

3.6 Paving - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
R9G 1 NOx co 502
Category
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
.Ib/day·
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bic- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02
Ib/day
CH4 I N20 C02e
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I •• I I I I I I I I I , I • I I •
............... ... ... ... ...... .. -------.,-------.,-------,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------"T"'--------t ................. -,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------"P .............. ' Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 O.OOOO! 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I _. • • I • • I I I I I: I I I • •
...................... .. .,-------.,-------..-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------"T"-------"* ............ -.-------.,-------.,-------.,-------............... .. Worker 0.0613 0.0423 0.4094 I 1.0900e- I 0.1 232 I 8.8000e- I 0.1241 0.0327 I 8.1000e- I 0.0335 ! ' 108.5410 I 108.5410 3.1000e- , 108.6186 003 004 004 I 003 I
Total II 0.0613 I 0.0423 0.4094 1.0900e003

0.1232 8.8000e004 0.1241 0.0327 8.1000e004

0.0335 108.5410 108.5410 3.1oooe-l
003
108.6186
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx ' CO 502
Category
, Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Ib/day
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bio- C02 I NBio- C01 Total C02
Ib/day
CH4 N20 COZe
Off-Road 1.1028 I 11.1249 I 14.5805 I 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 0.5225 II 0.0000 • 2,207.660 12,207.660 I 0.7140 '2,225.510 I : I , I 3 I 3 I : 4 •• • I I • , I I , I I I • • I I
... -... --------n-------.,-------.,-------,-------~------~-------T-------~-------~-------~-------.---·---I-------~-------,-------,-------~------- Paving 0.0000 '0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Total 1.1028 11.1249 14.5805 0.0228 0.5679 0.5679 0.5225 I
I

0.5225 0.0000
3 3
2,207_6601 2.207.660 0_7140 2,225.510
4 354
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

3.6 Paving - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG I NOx ! co ,
S02
Category
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
, Fugitive--I Exhaust
PM10 PM10
Ib/day
PM10 1-FU9itive '-ExhausT l PM2.S
Total PM2.S PM2.S Total
Bio· C02 -I NBio· C02 I Total C02
·Ib/day
CH4
,
N20 C02e
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I •• I I I I I I I I I " I I I I I
-------.---~-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------~------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 f 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I _. I I I I I I I I 1 , I I I I I
-----------~-------, ------,-------,-------,-------,-------,------ ~------T_------T-------~- -.-------,-------,-------,-------T------- Worker 0.0613 0.0423 0.4094 I 1.0900e· I 0.1232 I 8.8000e· I 0.1241 0.0327 8.10ooe· 0.0335 t ' 108.5410 1108.5410 I 3.1000e· I '108.6186 003 004 004 I 003 I
Total 0.0613 1 0.0423 1 0.4094 1.0~0~' 1 0.1232 8.8:~e· 1 0.1241 I 0.0327 ~~e- 1 0.0335 1 108.5410 1 108.5410 3.~~e ~ 108.6186

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
Category
Off-Road
ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Ib/day
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.S
Total
Bio· C02 -I NBio- C02 I Total C02
Ib/day
CH4 N20 C02e

1.0327 I 10.1917 I 14.5842 I 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 II ' 2.207.584 I 2.207.584 I 0.7140 ' 2.225.433 I I I , • 1 I 1 I I 6 •• • I I I I I I I I , I • I • I
-- --------n-------,-------,-------T-------~------~------~------~-------~-------T-------~--- -··~------~------~-------~------~------. Paving 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102
i

0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584 I 0.7140
1 1
2,225.433
6 355
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
PM10 . I Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.S
Total PM2.S PM2.S Total
--- -
Fugitive 'Exhaust C02e
. PM10 . PM10 I Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02 1 ROG NOx CO S02 CH4 N20 Category Ib/day Ib/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 & s. I I I I I • I I I & I I I I I
----------.~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------,-------T-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------~------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 & ., I I I I • I • • • " I I • • I
-----------~-------,-------T_------,-------,-------,-------,-------~------,_------T-------~-------I-------,-------T-------,-------T------- Worker 0.0567 I 0.0377 I 0.3707 1.0S00e- I 0.1232 I B.5000e- 0.1241 0.0327 I 7.8000e- I 0.0335 t . 104.4609 I 104.4609 I 2.7600e- I I 104.5298 003 004 004, 003
Total 0.0567 0.0377 0_3707 1.0~~e- 1 0_1232 1 8.
5: 40e- 1 0.1241 1 0.0327 7.8~~e·1 0.0335
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO S02
Category
Fugitive
. PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Ib/day
PM10
Total·
Fugitive
PM2.S
Exhaust
PM2.S
PM2.5
Total
, 1 104.4609 1 104.4609 2_7;~~e- 1 104.5298
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02 CH4 J N20 C02e
Ib/day
Off-Road 1.0327 I 10.1917 I 14.5842 I 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 ~ 0.0000 • 2.207.584 I 2.207.584 I 0.7140 • 2.225.433 I t I ill I 1 I I 6 •• I • • I • I I I • I: • • • I • ........ .. .. .. .. .. .... ..-------...-------...-------,-------.,-------,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------or-------"* ...... - - - -.-------,-------,-------.,-------T - .......... . ' Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 I I 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 t

0.4694 0.0000
1 1
2,207.58412,207.584 0.7140 1 2,225.433
6 356
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx co S02
Category
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County. Winter
Fugitive Exhaust
PM10 PM10
'Ib/day
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
, PM2.5
PM2,5
Total
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02
Ib/day
CH4 NZO I COZe
Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 , •• I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I -----------~-------,-------,-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------.-------I-------,-------,-------,-------~------- Vendor 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 , _. I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I -----------~-------,-------,_------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------T------- Worker 0.0567 0.0377 0.3707' 1.0500e- 0.1232 8.5000e-' 0.1241 0.0327 7.8000e-' 0.0335 I 104.4609 ' 104.4609 ' 2.7600e- , 104.5298 003 004 004, 003
Total 0_0567 0.0377 0.3707

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO
Category
1_0S00e003
S02

0.1232
Fugitive
PM10

8.S000e- t 0.1241
004
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Ib/day

0.0327
Fugitive
PM2.5

7.8000e-\ 0.0335
004
Exhaust
' PM2,5
PM2,5
Total
, 1104_460:J 104.4609
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02
2_7600e003
CH4
Ib/day
1104.5298
N20 C02e
Archil. Coating :: 493.2143 : 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 1 0,0000 0.0000 , •• I I , I I I I I I & I I I I I -----------.-------,-------,-------~-------~-------~-------~-------T_------~-------T-------~---·---,-------~-------~-------T_------~-.----- Off-Road 0,1917 1,3030 1,8111 2,9700e-' 0,0708 0.0708 0.0708 ' 0,0708 l . 281.4481 ' 281.4481' 0,0168 • 281.8690 003 ,
Total 493.4060 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e003

0.0708 0.0708
, 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 I 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690
357
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
Category
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
PM2.S
Total
C02e
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , ., I I I I I I I I I , r I I I I -----------~-------~-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------T------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , _. I I I I I I I I I , I I t I I -----------~-------,-------T_------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------~------T-------~-------I-------,-------,-------~------T------- Worker 0.3929 0.2615 2.5703' 7.2700e-' 0.8543 5.8900e- ' 0.8602 0.2266 5.4300e- I 0.2320 t ' 724.2621 I 724.2621 I 0.0191 I 724.7396 003 003 003 ,
Total
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx ' co
. Category
502 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
IbJday
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.S
Exhaust
PM2.S
PM2.S
Total
,
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02
Ib/day
724.7396
CH4 N20 C02e
Archit. Coating _. 493.2143 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 •• I , •• • I I I I I I , I , I I I I I
-----------~-------T_------,-------,-------T_------,-------T-------,-------,-------T-------~-------~------T_------~-------~-------~------- Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 I 2.9700e- I 0,0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 t 0.0000 '281.4481 '281.4481 I 0.0168 I 281.8690 003 I
Total 493.4060 1.3030 1_8111 2.9700e003

0.0708 0.0708
, 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 I 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 358
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitiaated Construction Off·Site
RaG NOx J CO
Category
S02
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County. Winter
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
Ib/day .

PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.S
PM2.S
Total
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 .1 Total C02
Ib/day
CH4 N20 C02e
Hauling •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - I . , I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I
···--------n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~---- --~-------I-------,-------,-------,-------T------- Vendor 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000: 0.0000 I 0.0000 , _. I t I I I I I I I , I t I I I -----------n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~------T_------T-------.-------I-------,-------~------,-------T------- Worker 0.3929 0.2615 2.5703 7.2700e- I 0.8543 I 5.8900e- I 0.8602 0.2266 I S.4300e- 0.2320 t 724.2621 I 724.2621 I 0.0191 I 724.7396 003 003 003 ,
Total 0.3929 0.2615 j 2_5703

4.0 Operational Detail· Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

7.2700e003 0_8543 5.8900e003 0.8602 0.2266 5.4300e003 I

0.2320 724.2621 724.2621 0.0191 724.7396
359
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2
ROG Ll Co
Category

Page 26 of 30 ends

AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
Ib/day
PMHf I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM2.S
Total ' PM2.5 1 PM2.5 TOlal
Bio- C02 I NBio-cOil Tot 1 C02 I CH4 1 N20 C02e
Ib/day
Mitigated ., 18.7347 • 241 .2277 • 197.9891 • 0.9637 • 54,7010 • 0.8903 • 55.5913 • 14.7023 • 0.8419 15.5442', . 99.013.94 • 99.013.94' 9.5423 • 99,252.50 • • • I I • I • I I ,I 89 I 89 I : 71 •• I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I
.................... -I'r-------....,.------....,.-------r-------....,.------...,..------....... -------r-------"T"-------,..-------............. -,..------..,...------..,..-------,..-------r ............ .. Unmitigated 18.7347· 241.2277 '197.9891 0.9637 54.7010 ' 0.8903 55.5913 14.7023' 0.8419 15.5442· , 99.013.94 • 99,01 3.94' 9.5423 • 99,252.50 • 89 ' 89 ' , 71

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday I Saturday ISunday 'Annual VMT Annual VMT General Light Industry . 8.652.98 I 1,638.73 I 844.19 . 19.080,174 . 19,080,174 Total I 8,652.98 I 1.638.73 I 844.19 I 19,080.174 I 19,080,174

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose.% ,
Land Use H'W or CoW I H-S or C-C I H-Oor C-NW H-W or ccwi H-S or C-C I H:O or C-NW Primary I Diverted I Pa s-by ' General Light Industry . 9.50 . 7.30 7.30 . 59.00 28.00 13.00 . 92 . 5 . 3 . . . . . . . . j

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use ' T LDA I LDn LDT2 I MDV LHD1 .1 LHD2 . MHD--I HHD OBUS I UBUS I -MCY I S¥3US MH General Light Industry • 0.498498: 0.030090: 0.155509: 0.109662: 0.018147: 0.004601: 0.015536: 0.154991: 0.002397: 0.002156: 0.006230: 0.001554: 0.000628

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Enerav Use: N
360
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County. Winter

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG I NOX_J
co I S02 FU9itive I. E.xhaust I PM10 PM10·
PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5
Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total C02 I CH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
NaturalGas 0.7655 6.9593 5.8458 0.0418 0.5289 0.5289 0.5289 0.5289 t . 8,351.094 • 8,351.094' 0.1601 0.1531' 8,400.720 Mitigated I • 3 : 3 ' , 7 •• I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I ................................. .,...------...--------r------..,..-------,-------..... -------r-------...--------....------..,..-------........... _ ..... -,..------"'T"------..... ------...,..------..,. ................. ... NaturalGas 0.7655 6.9593 5.8458 0.0418 0.5289 0.5289 0.5289 0.5289 • 8,351 .094 • 8,351.094' 0.1601 0.1531' 8,400.720 Unmitigated • 3 • 3 • • 7

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa ROG • s Use
Land Use kBTU/yr
General Light • 70984.3 0.7655 , 6.9593 . 5.8458
Industry
Total
, 0.0418 , ,
PM2.5
Total
Ib/day
0,5289 , 0.5289 , , 0.5289 , 0.5289 • 8,351 .094' 8,351.094 • 0.1601 , 0.1531 . . , 3 , 3 C02e
: 8,400.720
7 8,400.720
7 361
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated

Page 28 of 30 ends

AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
NaturalGa ROG PM2.5 C02e
, s Use Total
Land Use kBTU/yr
General Light • 70.9843 0.7655' 6.9593 • 5.8458 • 0.0418 • 0.5289 0.5289 0.5289 0,5289 • 8,351 .094 • 8,351.094' 0.1601 ' 0.1531 • 8.400.720 Industry • 3 ' 3 ' , 7
Total 8,400.720
7 6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG I NOx co I S02 - Fugitive Exhaust·
PM10 PM10
PM10 Fugitive ' Exhaust PM2.5
Total PM2.5 " PM2.5 Total
Bio- C02 I NBio- C02 I Total CO? ICH4 N20 C02e
Category Ib/day Ib/day
Mitigated •• 31.3085 ' 1.1600e-· 0.1270 • 1.0000e- , • 4.5000e- • 4.5000e- , , 4.5000e- , 4.5000e- ·1' 0.2717 0.2717' 7.2000e- , 0.2896 •• '003' '005: : 004 ' 004' : 004 : 004 I : 004 : _. I I I I I I I I I , I I I I f ...................... ..,..-------r--------r-------""T"-------r-------~------_r_------_r_---- ---r--------,..------- ....... e .... -r--------.-------...,..-------,..-------r ........... .. Unmitigated 31.3085' 1.1600e-· 0.1270 1.0000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- • 4.5000e- • 4.5000e- • 0.2717 0.2717 7.2000e- 0.2896 003 005 004 004 004 004 004
362
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter
RaG 1 NOx co I S02 1 Fugitiv~
PM10
Exhaust 1
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive 1 Exhaust
PM2.5 PM2.5
PM2.5
. Total
Bio- C02 NBio- C02 I Total C02 1_ CH4 ' 1 N20 1 C02e
SubCategory Ib/day Ib/day
Architectural 4.7295 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 Coating & s. I I I I , I I I I , I • I I I
.................... -11'1-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------"T"-------.............. -1-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,. ............. -1 Consumer ., 26.5672 : ' I I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 i I 0.0000 I 0.0000 Products , •• I I I I , I • • I , I • • • I
--------- .. -~-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------~------~------"T"-------.------ .. I-------T_------T-------~------.,.------ Landscaping 0.0118 I 1.1600e- 0.1270' 1.oo00e- I , 4.5000e- , 4.5OO0e- , 4.5000e- I 4.Soo0e- t 0.2717 I 0.2717 I 7.2000e- 0.2896 003 005 004 004 004 004, 004
Total
Mitiaated
SUbCategory
Architectural
Coating

31.3085 11.16ooe003
ROG

4.7295

0.1270
005 11.0000e-1 004 004

4.5oooe-14.5oooe0.0000 0.0000
1 4.5oooe004

4.5000e004
PM2.S
Total
,

0.0000 0.0000 i
&

0. 2717 1 0.2717 17.2~oe-1 I 0_2896
C02e

0.0000 I 0.0000
s. I I I I • I • • I " I • • I •
-----------.-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-------.,-- -----.,-------T-------T-------T-------~----·--I-------~------T-------T-------~---.- .. Consumer :: 26.5672 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 Products , _. I I I I , I I I I , I I I I I
--.--------.-------,-------,-------,-------~-------~-------~-------~-------~-------T-------~-----·-I-------~-------~-------,-------~------ Landscaping 0.0118 I 1.1600e- I 0.1270 I 1.0000e- I , 4.5000e- , 4.5OO0e- , , 4.5000e- I 4.5000e- ~ 0.2717 0.2717 I 7.2000e- I 0.2896 Total 31.3085

7.0 Water Detail
003 005 004 004 004 004, 004 I

7.2000e004

0.2896
363
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 30 Date: 11/11/20205:28 PM AMG Industrial Annexation - Merced County, Winter

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day DayslYear HorsePower Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipmeht Type Number 'Hours/Day HourslYear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number
"
Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type ,Number

11.0 Vegetation
364
Start date and time 11/11/20 18:09:41
AERSCREEN 16216
AMG Industrial Construction
AMG Industrial Construction

DATA ENTRY VALIDATION

METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA **
Emission Rate: 0 . 212E-02 g/s 0 . 168E-01 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 458.00 meters 1502.62 feet
Area Source Width: 252.00 meters 826.77 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1. 50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 40074
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
365
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 13.13 meters
Probe distance: 5131313. meters
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 2513.13 / 3113.13 K
Minimum Wind Speed: 13.5 m/s

13.13 feet
164134. feet
-9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
366
Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted

DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2020.11.11 AMGIndustrial_Construction.out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics ...
367
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 11/11/20 18:10:27
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
368
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
369
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
370
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 371
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 372
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
373
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
374
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
375
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 38 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 8 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 376
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
377
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 38 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWS ECTOR ended 11/11/28 18:18:52
REFINE started 11/11/28 18:18:52
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 8 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
378
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 11/11/20 18:10:55
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 11/11/20 18:10:57
379
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H8 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z8 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT

REF TA HT

8. 72455E+88 1.88 8.88 15.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.75266E+88 25.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.78328E+88 58.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.81185E+88 75.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.83856E+88 188.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.86365E+88 125.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.88723E+88 158.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.98958E+88 175.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.93858E+88 288.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.95852E+88 225.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.95682E+88 258.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8
* 8.95824E+88 252.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 77248E+88 275.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.65368E+88 388.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.57312E+88 325.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.52338E+88 358.88 8.88 25.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 380
310.0 2.0

0.47739E+00 375.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 13-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43985E+00 400.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 13-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1. 50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.41022E+00 425.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 38740E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.36695E+00 475.130 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 34827E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 13.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.33116E+00 525.00 13.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.31549E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.30091E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 13.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28755E+00 600.00 13.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.27516E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 13.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.26357E+00 650.00 13.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.25280E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1. 50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 24276E+00 700.00 13.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 13.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.23340E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1. 50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 22460E+00 750.00 13.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.21626E+00 775.00 0.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
381
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.20855E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.20125E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 19437E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18787E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18174E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17587E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17037E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 16520E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 16030E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1 . 000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15555E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15103E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 14677E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 14273E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 13887E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 13514E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
0 . 13160E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
382

0. 12824E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.50 113.13 3113.0 2.13
e.12503E+00 1225.1313 0.00 13.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.13

0.12193E+00 12513.013 13.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 lose 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.13

0.11898E+00 1275.1313 13.013 0.13 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.13
e.11610E+0e 1300.013 13.1313 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.13

0. 11334E+0e 1325.1313 13.1313 13.0 Winter 13-3613 100110131 -1.30 0.1343 -9.0013 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.13013 loSe 13.35 13.50 113.13 310.0 2.13
e.11e70E+ee 13513.1313 13.130 13.13 Winter 13-3613 1001113131 -1.30 13.1343 -9.0013 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.13013 loSe 0.35 13.50 113.13 310.0 2.13
e.1e818E+ee 1375.1313 0.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 1001113131 -1. 30 13.1343 -9.0013 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.13

0.10576E+00 141313.013 13.130 13.13 Winter 13-3613 11301113131 -1. 30 0.1343 -9.01313 13.0213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.01313 1.50 0.35 13.50 113.0 3113.0 2.13
e.1e344E+00 1425.130 0.1313 0.13 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.0013 13.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.13013 lose 0.35 13.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 10121E+00 1450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.1343 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.0013 loSe 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
e.99071E-01 1475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.1343 -9.0013 0.1320 -999. 21. 6.0 1.01313 loSe 13.35 13.50 10.0 310.0 2.13

0.96999E-01 15130.013 0.013 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.94967E-01 1525.00 0.1313 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.93001E-01 1550.00 0.130 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.91109E-01 1575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.89287E-01 1600.00 0.130 0.0 Winter 0-3613 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 383
31S.S 2.8

8.87S31E-81 162S.8S 8.8S S.8 Winter 8-368 188118el
-1.3e 8.e43 -9.eS8 8.S28 -999. 21. 6.e 1.e8e 1.58 8.35 8.58 lS.8 318.8 2.8

8.8S838E-81 16S8.8S S.SS S.S Winter 8-36S 18811Sel
-1. 3S 8.843 -9.SS8 8.S28 -999. 21. 6.S 1.SSS 1.58 S.3S S.S8 lS.S 318.e 2.8

8.84284E-81 167S.8S S.SS S.S Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.3S 8.S43 -9.SS8 8.S2S -999. 21. 6.8 1.SSS loSS S.3S 8.58 lS.8 318.S 2.8

8.82627E-81 178S.8S S.S8 8.8 Winter S-368 18S11S81
-1.38 8.S43 -9.SS8 e.S2e -999. 21. 6.8 1.eSe 1.58 8.35 8.58 lS.8 318.S 2.8

8.81184E-01 172S.0S 0.SS S.S Winter 0-360 18S11S01
-1.30 0.843 -9.000 e.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.eSS loSS S.3S S.SS le.0 318.S 2.8

0.7963lE-Sl 17SS.00 S.SS S.S Winter 0-360 18S11S01
-1.38 0.043 -9.088 8.S20 -999. 21. 6.8 1.SSS 1.50 S.3S 8.50 lS.0 318.S 2.8

0.78208E-01 177S.SS S.SS S.0 Winter 0-36S 18011SS1
-1.30 8.043 -9.S80 8.S20 -999. 21. 6.8 1.SSS 1.50 0.35 0.50 lS.0 318.S 2.S

0.7680SE-Sl 18S0.SS S.SS 0.0 Winter 8-360 18011eSl
-1.3S 8.043 -9.S8S 8.S20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.SSS loSS 0.35 0.58 lS.0 310.0 2.0

0.7S448E-Sl 182S.SS S.S0 0.S Winter 0-36S 10011SS1
-1.38 8.043 -9.S8e 8.S2e -999. 21. 6.S 1.SSS loSS 8.35 0.58 lS.0 318.0 2.0

0.74134E-Sl 18SS.SS S.SS s.e Winter 0-360 10011SS1
-1.38 8.S43 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.S 1.SSS 1.50 S.3S 0.50 lS.S 318.0 2.0

0.7286lE-Sl 1875.00 S.SS S.S Winter S-368 10011Sel
-1.38 0.843 -9.8S0 0.S20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.SSe 1.50 S.3S 8.58 lS.S 318.S 2.0
S.71628E-01 1ge5.0S s.se S.S Winter S-360 lSS11SS1
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 S.S20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.00S loSS S.3S 0.58 lS.0 318.S 2.0

8.70426E-81 1925.0S 0.S8 8.S Winter 8-368 188n001
-1.38 S.843 -9.e80 0.020 -999. 21. 6.S 1.e8S 1.50 S.3S e.S8 lS.S 318.0 2.0

8.692S2E-81 19S8.0S 0.SS 0.S Winter 0-368 100nSSl
-1.38 S.043 -9.08e 0.02e -999. 21. 6.S LeeS 1.50 S.3S 0.58 lS.S 310.0 2.0
S.68112E-81 1975.00 8.8S 8.8 Winter 8-368 10011SS1
-1.30 e.043 -9.S80 e.e20 -999. 21. 6.S LeeS loSS S.3S S.S0 lS.S 31e.e 2.8
S.67SS6E-el 28S0.SS 0.S0 8.8 Winter 8-368 100110el
-1.38 8.S43 -9.808 8.S20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.S8S 1.58 S.3S 0.58 10.0 310.8 2.0
S.6S933E-01 2S2S.0S S.SS S.0 Winter S-360 108110S1
384
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.64890E-01 2050.00 0.00 8.8 Winter 0-368 18811881
-1.38 8.043 -9.888 0.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 0.35 8.58 18.8 318.0 2.8

8.63877E-81 2075.08 8.88 0.8 Winter 0-360 18ellee1
-1.30 8.843 -9.80e 0.82e -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.50 e.35 e.58 10.e 31e.e 2.e
e.62892E-81 21ee.8e 8.88 8.e Winter e-36e 18e1l881
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.8e8 8.82e -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee 1.58 e.35 e.5e 10.8 31e.e 2.e
e.61934E-e1 2125.8e e.ee 8.e Winter e-36e 18el18e1
-1. 30 e.e43 -9.e08 e.e28 -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee lose 0.35 e.5e 18.e 31e.e 2.e

8.61883E-e1 215e.ee 8.8e 8.e Winter 0-368 1e8118e1
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee loSe e.35 8.50 1e.0 3 HI. 0 2.e
e.60097E-01 2175.e8 8.e0 8.8 Winter 8-368 10elle81
-1.30 8.e43 -9.888 0.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.8e8 1.58 8.35 e.58 18.8 310.0 2.e

8.59282E-01 2288.8e 8.88 8.8 Winter 0-368 18e1l881
-1.30 8.843 -9.088 0.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 0.35 e.58 10.8 318.0 2.e

8.S8329E-81 2225.8e e.08 8.e Winter 0-36e 18elle81
-1.30 8.843 -9.0e8 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 loSe e.35 e.58 1e.8 318.0 2.0

0.S7478E-81 225e.88 8.0e 8.8 Winter 0-368 18811881
-1 . 3e 0.e43 -9.e08 e.e28 -999. 21. 6.e 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.e 318.0 2.8

0.S6649E-e1 2275.88 0.08 8.0 Winter e-360 10e1l001
-1.30 0.043 -9.008 0.020 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 loSe 0.35 0.Se 1e.8 31e.0 2.8

8.S5842E-e1 2300.80 0.08 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011801
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.028 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 loSe e.35 0.se 10.0 31e.0 2.0

0.550S5E-01 2325.00 8.8e 8.0 Winter 0-36e 1e8118e1
-1.30 0.043 -9.008 e.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.80e loSe e.35 e.5e 10.0 310.0 2.8

0.54288E-01 2358.00 8.88 8.8 Winter 0-368 1e811881
-1.30 0.043 -9.0e8 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.088 1.50 8.35 e.5e 10.8 318.0 2.8
e.S354eE-01 2375.80 0.08 0.0 Winter e-368 1e0118e1
-1.30 0.043 -9.00e 8.828 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.58 0.35 e.S0 10.0 31e.0 2.0

8.S2811E-e1 240e.0e 8.08 8.0 Winter 0-36e 18011001
-1. 30 e.e43 -9.ee0 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 e.35 0.5e 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.52099E-01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 18811e81
-1.30 0.843 -9.088 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.e88 loSe 8.35 8.58 18.8 310.0 2.8
385

0. 51404E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 50726E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.50063E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.49416E-01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48777E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48154E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.47544E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.46948E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.46365E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45794E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.45237E-01 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44691E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44157E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43635E-01 2775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43120E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.42612E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.42115E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 386
3le.e 2.e
e.4l628E-el 287S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-l.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le .e 3le.e 2.e
e.411SlE-el 2gee.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-l.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.4e684E-el 292S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.4e226E-el 29se.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.39777E-el 297S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.39337E-el 3eee.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3s e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.38ge6E-el 3e2S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.38483E-el 3ese.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3s e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.38e68E-el 3e7s.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3s e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.37662E-el 3lee.ee e.ee s.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.37262E-el 3l2S.ee e.ee s.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.36869E-el 3lse.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.36484E-el 3l7s.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-l.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3s e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.36le7E-el 32ee.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-l.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.3s736E-el 322s.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.3s372E-el 32se.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 3le.e 2.e
e.3selSE-el 327s.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
387
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.34663E-01 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.34319E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 113.13 3113.0 2.0

0.33980E-el 3350.1313 13.013 13.13 Winter 13-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.13130 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 0.35 13.50 113.13 3113.0 2.0

0.33647E-01 3375.1313 0.013 0.e Winter 0-360 10131113131 -1. 30 13.043 -9.13130 0.02e -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 13.35 13.50 113.13 3113.13 2.0

0.33320E-01 34ee.ee 13.130 0.13 Winter 0-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.13130 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.0130 1.50 13.35 0.513 113.13 3113.0 2.13
e.32998E-01 3425.1313 13.130 0.e Winter 0-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.131313 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.13 1.eee loSe 13.35 0.513 113.13 31e.e 2.13

0.32682E-01 34513.1313 13.130 e.e Winter 0-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.13013 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.13013 1.50 13.35 0.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13

0.32372E-01 3475.1313 0.013 0.13 Winter 0-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.0013 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.0e0 1.50 13.35 0.50 113.13 3113.0 2.13

0.32e66E-01 35130.1313 e.00 0.13 Winter 0-360 113131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.0130 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.0 2.13

0.31765E-01 3s25.ee 13.130 0.e Winter 0-360 11313111301 -1.30 13.043 -9.0e0 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.eee 1.50 e.35 13.513 113.13 3113.0 2.13
e.31467E-el 355e.ee 13.130 0.13 Winter 0-360 11313111301 -1.30 13.043 -9.0130 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.0 2.0
e.31174E-el 3575.1313 0.00 0.13 Winter 0-360 1131311001 -1.30 13.043 -9.0130 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.eee loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.0 2.0
e.3e885E-01 36e0.ee 0.0e 0.13 Winter 0-360 11313111301
-1. 313 13.043 -9.ee0 0.020 -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee 1.5e 13.35 13.513 le.e 310.0 2.0
e.3e601E-01 3625.130 13.130 0.e Winter 0-360 11313111301 -1.30 13.043 -9.0013 e.02e -999. 21. 6.0 1.1300 1.50 e.35 13.513 113.13 310.0 2.13

0.30322E-01 36513.1313 0.130 e.e Winter 0-360 1131311001 -1.30 0.043 -9.0130 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.0ee 1.50 13.35 0.513 113.0 3113.13 2.13
e.3ee47E-el 3675.1313 13.130 13.13 Winter 13-3613 10131113131 -1.30 13.043 -9.0130 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.131313 1.50 13.35 e.5e 113.0 3113.0 2.0
388

0.29777E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.29510E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.a20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.29248E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28990E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28735E-01 380a.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.28482E-01 3825.0a a.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.eee 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.0e0 1.50 0.35 0.5e 1e.0 310.0 2.e

0.28233E-01 3850.00 0.e0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 e.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.27988E-01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 e.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.27746E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.00e 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 1e.0 310.0 2.0

0.27508E-e1 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.27274E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 e.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.27043E-01 3975.00 0.00 e.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.26816E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 H:l011001
-1.30 0.043 -9 . 000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.0e0 1.50 0.35 0.50 1e.0 310.0 2.0

0.26591E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1e011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
e.26370E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1e011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.26153E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1e011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.00e 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 1e.0 310.0 2.0

0.25938E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 389
31e.e 2.e
e.25727E-e1 4125.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 1eellee1
-1.30 e.e43 -9.ee0 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.0ee 1.5e e.35 e.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
e.25519E-e1 415e.00 e.e0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.e43 -9.000 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 e.50 1e.0 31e.e 2.e

0.25313E-01 4175.00 0.00 e.0 Winter 0-360 1e011001
-1.30 e.043 -9.ee0 e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31e.e 2.0

0.25112E-01 42ee.00 0.ee 5.e Winter e-360 10011001
-1.3e 0.e43 -9.e00 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.000 1.50 e.35 0.5e 10.e 31e.e 2.0
e.24913E-01 4225.ee 0.e0 5.e Winter 0-360 10el10e1
-1. 3e 0.e43 -9.e00 e.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee 1.50 e.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.24717E-e1 425e.ee 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 e.043 -9.000 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.eee 1.50 e.35 e.50 10.0 31e.e 2.0
e.24523E-01 4275.0e e.00 5.0 Winter e-360 100110e1
-1. 30 0.e43 -9.000 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.e0e 1.5e e.35 0.50 10.e 310.e 2.0

0.2433IE-01 430e.00 e.ee 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.02e -999. 21. 6.e 1.0ee 1.50 0.35 0.50 1e.e 310.0 2.0

0.24142E-e1 4325.0e 0.e0 5.e Winter 0-360 1ee1l0e1
-1.30 0.e43 -9.000 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.0e0 1.50 0.35 e.5e 10.0 310.0 2.0
e.23956E-01 435e.ee 0.e0 5.e Winter e-36e 1ee1l0e1
-1. 3e 0.043 -9.ee0 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.000 1.50 e.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.23772E-01 4375.ee 0.00 5.e Winter 0-36e 10011001
-1.30 e.043 -9.0e0 0.02e -999. 21. 6.0 1.e00 1.50 0.35 e.50 1e.0 31e.0 2.0
e.235geE-e1 440e.0e e.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 100110e1
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.e 1.e0e 1.50 0.35 e.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.23411E-01 4425.0e 0.e0 5.0 Winter e-360 1e011001
-1. 3e e.043 -9.000 e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.e0e 1.5e e.35 e.50 1e.0 31e.e 2.0
e.23235E-e1 445e.0e 0.ee 5.e Winter 0-360 1ee1l0e1
-1.3e e.e43 -9.ee0 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e l.eee 1.5e e.35 e.5e 1e.e 31e.0 2.0
e.23e6eE-e1 4475.0e e.ee 5.e Winter e-36e 1eel1001
-1.3e e.e43 -9.e00 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.eee 1.5e e.35 e.50 1e.0 310.0 2.0

0.22888E-e1 45ee.ee 0.ee 5.e Winter e-36e 1e011e01
-1.30 e.043 -9.000 0.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee 1.50 e.35 e.50 10.e 31e.e 2.e
e.22719E-e1 4525.ee e.ee 5.e Winter e-36e 1ee1l0e1
390
-1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22551E-el 45513.1313 13.1313 5.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22386E-el 4575.1313 13.1313 5.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22642E-el 461313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22475E-el 4625.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2231eE-el 46513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22147E-el 4675.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21986E-el 471313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21827E-el 4725.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2167eE-el 47513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21515E-el 4775.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21362E-el 481313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2121eE-el 4825.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21e61E-el 48513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2e914E-el 4875.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2e768E-el 491313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2e624E-el 4925.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
391

0.20481E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10 . 0 310.0 2.0

0.20341E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.20202E-01 5000.00 0.00 e.e Winter 0-36e 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.0e0 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 lose 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
392
Start date and time 11/11/20 18:18:58
AERSCREEN 16216
AMG Industrial
AMG Industrial

DATA ENTRY VALIDATION

METRIC ENGLISH
** AREADATA **
Emission Rate: 0.624E-02 g/s 0.495E-01 lb/hr
Area Height : 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length: 458.00 meters 1502.62 feet
Area Source Width: 252.00 meters 826.77 feet
Vertical Dimension: 1. 50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 40074
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
393
No Building Downwash Parameters
** TERRAIN DATA **
No Terrain Elevations
Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters
Probe distance: 5000. meters
No flagpole receptors
No discrete receptors used
** FUMIGATION DATA **
No fumigation requested
** METEOROLOGY DATA **
Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K
Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s

0.0 feet
16404. feet
-9.7 / 98.3 Deg F
394
Anemometer Height: le .eee meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted

DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file :
2e2e.ll.ll_AMGIndustrial_Operational .out
*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics ...
395
Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo
Winter 13.35 1.50 1.000
Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000
Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000
Autumn 0.18 2.1313 1.13130
Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_e4_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 11/11/20 18:19:47
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector 1
396
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector e ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector le ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
397
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
398
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 38 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Spring
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 8 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 399
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 400
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 3e ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Summer
Processing surface roughness sector 1
401
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector e ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector le ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
402
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
403
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Autumn
Processing surface roughness sector 1
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 1
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 2
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 404
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 3
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 4
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 5
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
405
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector 7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 3e ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
FLOWSECTOR ended 11/11/2e 18:2e:ll
REFINE started 11/11/2e 18:2e:ll
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector e ******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
406
*** NONE ***
REFINE ended 11/11/20 18:20:14
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time 11/11/20 18:20:16
407
Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H8 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z8 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT

REF TA HT

8.21334E+81 1.88 8.88 15.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.22162E+81 25.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.23863E+81 58.88 0.00 8.0 Winter 8-360 18811a81
-1. 30 a.a43 -9.880 8.028 -999. 21. 6.0 1.888 1. sa a.3S 8.58 la.8 318.a 2.a
a.23984E+al 75.00 0.08 a.8 Winter 8-36a 18a11881
-1.38 a.a43 -9.a80 8.028 -999. 21. 6.0 1.8a0 1.50 a.3S a.sa la.8 318.a 2.8

0.24691E+81 100.00 a.08 0.0 Winter 8-368 18811001
-1.38 8.843 -9.8aa 8.a28 -999. 21. 6.a 1.8a8 1. sa 8.35 a.58 18.a 318.8 2.8
a.2S43aE+01 125.8a 0.00 0.0 Winter a-360 18a11801
-1.38 a.843 -9.aaa 8.020 -999. 21. 6.8 1.00a 1.58 a.3S 8.58 10.a 318.8 2.8

8.26124E+01 15a.80 0.00 8.8 Winter a-36a 18811881
-1.38 8.a43 -9.8aa 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.88a 1.58 a.3S a.S8 18.a 318.a 2.8

0.2678aE+01 175.00 0.08 8.0 Winter 0-360 18811881
-1. 3a 8.843 -9.800 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.800 1.50 8.35 8.58 18.a 318.8 2.8
a.274a8E+al 2a8.8a 8.88 0.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.a43 -9.80a 8.a28 -999. 21. 6.a 1.800 1. sa 8.35 a.S8 18.8 310.8 2.8
a.27988E+al 22S.8a a.88 s.a Winter a-36a laa11aal
-1.38 a.a43 -9.aa8 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.8a8 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.0 31a.8 2.8
a.28173E+81 258.0a a.88 2S.a Winter a-36a 188118al
-1.38 8.043 -9.8a0 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.088 1.50 8.35 a.S8 la.8 31a.8 2.8
* 8.2821SE+81 252.0a a.aa 2S.a Winter 8-36a 18811aal
-1.38 8.843 -9.88a 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.a88 1. sa a.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8
a.22743E+81 275.00 0.00 2S.a Winter 0-36a 18011aal
-1.30 0.043 -9.a08 a.a20 -999. 21. 6.a 1.0a0 1. sa a.3S 8.sa la.a 31a.8 2.8

8. 19245E+81 388.00 8.88 25.8 Winter 0-36a 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.a8a 8.82a -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 a.35 8.Sa la.8 31a.0 2.0
a.1687SE+81 325.08 8.00 25.8 Winter 0-36a la811a81
-1.38 8.043 -9.88a 8.02a -999. 21. 6.8 1.a88 1.50 a.35 8.Sa 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 15488E+al 358.88 0.a8 25.8 Winter 8-368 la811081
-1.38 8.843 -9.80a a.828 -999. 21. 6.0 1.08a 1.50 0.35 8.58 10.a 408
3113.13 2.13
e.14e57E+el 375.1313 13.1313 25.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.12951E+el 41313.1313 13.1313 25.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.12e79E+el 425.1313 13.1313 213.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.114e7E+el 4513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.le8e5E+el 475.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.le255E+el 51313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.9751eE+ee 525.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.92894E+ee 5513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.886e2E+ee 575.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.84667E+ee 61313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.81e2eE+ee 625.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.776e6E+ee 6513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.74437E+ee 675.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.7148eE+ee 71313.1313 13 . 1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.68724E+ee 725.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.66132E+ee 7513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.63678E+ee 775.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 409
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0 . 35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.6140SE+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.S92S8E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.S7231E+00 8S0.0B 0.00 B.B Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.B20 -999. 21. 6.B 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.B 310.0 2.0

0.S5318E+00 875.00 B.00 0.B Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.S3S12E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 51784E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 B.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.B 2.0

0.S0163E+00 950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.48641E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.00B 1.50 0.35 0.50 10 . 0 310.0 2.0

0.47199E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1 . 000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31B.0 2.0
B.4S802E+00 1B25.0B 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.44471E+B0 1050.00 0.BB 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.43214E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2 . 0

0.42024E+00 1100.BB 0.00 0.B Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.B 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.40890E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.39793E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310 . 0 2.0

0. 387S0E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.B Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 B.020 -999. 21. 6.B 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
410
a.37759E+aa 121313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 e.e2a -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 31e.e 2.13
a.36815E+aa 1225.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 a.e2a -999. 21. 6.e 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 31e.e 2.13
a.359a3E+aa 12513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
a.3sa33E+aa 1275.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1 . 131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 31e.e 2.13
a.34186E+aa 13ae.aa 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
a.33373E+aa 1325.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1. sa 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
a.32S96E+aa 13se.ae e.aa 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
a.318S2E+ea 1375.1313 e.ae 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.31139E+ea 14ae.ae 13.1313 13.13 Winter a-36e leelleel -1.3e a.e43 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.3e4S6E+ea 1425.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 e.se 113.13 31e.e 2.13
e.298aaE+ea 14513.1313 e.ea 13.13 Winter 13-3613 1eelleal -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.e 1.131313 1.513 13.35 e.se 113.13 31e.a 2.13
e.29171E+aa 1475.1313 13.1313 e.a Winter 13-3613 leallael -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.e 1.aea 1.513 13.35 e.se 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.28561E+aa 151313.1313 13.1313 e.a Winter 13-3613 leallael -1.313 13.1343 -9.eea e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e 1.aee 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 31e.a 2.13
e.27962E+ea 1525.1313 e.ae e.a Winter 13-3613 lealleel
-1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.e 1.131313 1.513 e.35 e.se la.e 3113.13 2.13
e.27384E+ea 15513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 lealleel -1.313 13.1343 -9.aae 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.e 1.eea 1.513 e.35 e.se 113.13 31e.a 2.13
e.26827E+ea 1575.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 lealleel -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.e 1.131313 1.513 13.35 e.se 113.13 31e.a 2.13
e.2629aE+ea 161313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 lealleel -1.313 e.a43 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 411
3113.13 2.13
e.2S773E+ee 1625.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1 . 513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2S27SE+ee 16513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.24793E+ee 1675.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.24329E+ee 171313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2388eE+ee 1725.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.23447E+ee 17513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13 . 1343 -9.131313 13 . 13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.23e28E+ee 1775.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.2261SE+ee 181313.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.22215E+ee 1825.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.21828E+ee 18513.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.214S3E+ee 1875.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.50 113.13 3113.0 2.0

0. 21egeE+ee 19013.1313 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.1300 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.1300 loSe 0.35 13.513 HLe 3113.13 2.0
e.2e737E+ee 1925.1313 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.30 13.1343 -9.13130 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.01313 loSe 13.35 13.513 10.0 310.13 2.0

0. 20391E+e0 19513.130 0.1313 13.13 Winter 0-360 100111301 -1.30 0.1343 -9.000 13.1320 -999. 21. 6.0 1.1300 1.50 13.35 13.513 10.0 310.0 2.13
e.200SSE+00 1975.1313 0.00 0.13 Winter 13-3613 1001113131 -1. 313 13.1343 -9.1300 0.0213 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 loSe 13.35 0.513 113.0 3113.13 2.0
e.1973eE+ee 201313.1313 0.00 0.0 Winter 13-3613 11301113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.13013 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 13.35 13.513 113.0 310.0 2.13
e.19414E+e0 21325.130 0.00 0.13 Winter 0-3613 100110131 412
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 19106E+00 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 18808E+00 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18518E+00 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1001H~01
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.18236E+00 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17962E+00 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17695E+00 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17432E+00 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.17175E+00 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 16924E+00 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.16680E+00 2275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 16442E+00 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 16211E+00 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15985E+00 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15765E+00 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.15550E+00 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 15340E+00 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1. 30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
413

8. 15136E+88 2458.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 e.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 14936E+88 2475.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.e43 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 1e.8 318.8 2.8

8. 14741E+88 2588.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.14558E+88 2525.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 14362E+88 2558.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 14178E+88 2575.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 13999E+88 2688.88 8.e8 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.13823E+88 2625.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 13652E+88 2658.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 13484E+88 2675.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 13328E+88 2788.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.13159E+88 2725.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 e.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 13882E+88 2758.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 12848E+88 2775.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 12696E+88 2888.88 8.e8 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 12547E+88 2825.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8. 12481E+88 2858.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 414
310.0 2.0

0.12257E+00 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.12117E+00 2900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11979E+00 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 11844E+00 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11712E+00 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11S83E+00 3000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11456E+00 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
o . 11331E+00 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11209E+00 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.11089E+00 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0. 10972E+00 3125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.108S6E+00 3150.00 0.00 0.13 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.01313 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.000 1.50 13.35 0.513 113.13 310.13 2.13
e.le743E+ee 3175.013 0.1313 0.0 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 -1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 0.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.13013 1.50 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.10631E+00 32013.1313 0.1313 0.13 Winter 0-3613 100110131 -1. 30 13.043 -9.01313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.50 13.35 13.50 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.10S22E+e0 3225.013 13.00 13.13 Winter 13-360 113131113131 -1. 30 13.1343 -9.131313 13.020 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 loSe 0.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.1041SE+00 3250.013 13.1313 13.13 Winter 0-3613 10131113131 -1.30 0.043 -9.1300 13.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.13130 loSe 0.35 13.513 10.0 3113.0 2.13
e.1031eE+00 3275.130 13.1313 13.13 Winter 13-3613 113131113131 415
-1.313 13.1343 -9.131313 13.13213 -999. 21. 6.13 1.131313 1.513 13.35 13.513 113.13 3113.13 2.13
e.1e286E+88 33813.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.13 2.8

8.18185E+88 3325.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.8813 1.58 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.8 2.8

8. 18885E+88 33513.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 188n881
-1.38 8.843 -9.8138 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.13 2.8

8.99872E-81 3375.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-3613 18en881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.81313 1.58 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.8 2.8

8.98188E-81 3488.813 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 188n881
-1. 38 13.843 -9.8813 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.1388 1.58 8.35 13.58 18.13 318.8 2.8

8.97162E-81 3425.88 8.813 8.8 Winter 8-368 188n881
-1.38 8.843 -9.8138 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8
8 . 96231E-81 345e.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 188neel
-1.38 8.e43 -9.888 8.e28 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.13 2.8
8 . 95316E-81 3475.ee 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 13.843 -9.8813 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 loSe 8.35 13.58 18.8 318.e 2.8

8.94417E-81 3588.ee 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.313 8.843 -9 . 88e 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.81313 1.58 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.8 2.8

8.93531E-81 3525.813 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 188n881
-1.38 8.843 -9.13813 8.e2e -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.513 8.35 13.58 18.13 318.8 2.8

8.92653E-81 3558.813 8.88 13.8 Winter 8-368 1e8n881
-1.38 13.843 -9.13138 8.1328 -999. 21. 6.8 1.1388 loSe 8.35 13.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.91789E-81 3575.ee 8.ee 8.8 Winter 8-36e 188n8e1
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.e2e -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.13 2.8

8.ge939E-81 3688.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 113811881
-1. 38 13.1343 -9.131313 13.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.13138 loSe 13.35 13.513 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.98HBE-e1 3625.8e 8.ee 8.8 Winter 13-3613 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.13138 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.81313 1.58 13.35 8.513 113.8 318.13 2.8

8.89281E-e1 365e.ee 8.88 13.13 Winter 13-3613 188n881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.81313 8.828 -999. 21. 6.e 1.13138 loSe 8.35 13.58 113.8 318.8 2.8

8.88472E-e1 3675.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 13-3613 18en881
-1.313 13.843 -9.8138 8.82e -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 loSe 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.8 2.8
416

0.87675E-01 3700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1 .000 1.50 0 . 35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.86892E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.00a 1.5a a.35 a.5a 1a.a 310.0 2.a
a.86120E-a1 375a.aa a.0a a.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 a.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6 . 0 1.aaa 1.50 a.3S a.S0 1a.0 310.0 2.0
a.8S361E-01 3775.aa 0.a0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011aa1
-1.30 a.043 -9.a00 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.0aa 1.50 0.35 a.sa 1a.a 310.0 2.0
a.846a8E-01 38aa.aa a.a0 0.a Winter a-360 100110a1
-1.30 a . 043 -9.a0a 0.02a -999. 21. 6.a 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 1a.0 310.0 2.a
a.83863E-01 3825.a0 0.a0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.a0a 0.02a -999. 21. 6.0 1.00a 1.5a 0.35 a.S0 10.a 310.a 2.a
a.8313aE-a1 385a.aa a.aa a.a Winter 0-360 1a011a01
-1. 30 a.a43 -9.00a a.02a -999. 21. 6.a 1.a0a 1. sa 0.35 a.S0 10.0 310.0 2.0
a.82408E-a1 387S.aa a.aa a.a Winter 0-360 1a011aa1
-1. 3a 0.043 -9.000 0.02a -999. 21. 6.0 1.a00 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.81697E-a1 3900.a0 0.0a 0.a Winter a-360 10011a01
-1.30 0.043 -9.0aa a.a2a -999. 21. 6.0 1.00a 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.a 310.0 2.0

0.80996E-01 3925.00 0.0a 0.0 Winter 0-360 1a011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.0aa a.a2a -999. 21. 6.0 1.0a0 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.a 310.0 2.a
a.80306E-01 39s0.0a 13 . 00 0.0 Winter 0-360 11301113131 -1.30 a.a43 -9.0013 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.aaa 1.50 0.35 0.50 1a.a 310.0 2.a

0.79626E-01 3975.00 a.a0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9 . 0a0 a.020 -999. 21. 6.a 1.00a 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.a 310.0 2.a

0.789S7E-01 4000.aa 0.a0 a.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.a20 -999. 21. 6.a 1.a00 1. sa 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.a

0.78297E-al 4025.00 a.a0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 13.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.a

0.77647E-01 4050.00 a.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.0013 a.a2a -999. 21. 6.0 1.0013 1.50 13.35 0.50 10.0 310.a 2.a
a.77a06E-01 4a7S.aa 13.00 0.a Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.a00 0.02a -999. 21. 6.a 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.76374E-01 4100.a0 0.a0 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 417
318.8 2.8

8.75752E-81 4125.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.75138E-81 4158.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.74533E-81 4175.88 8.88 8.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.73948E-81 4288.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.73356E-81 4225.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 113.8 318.8 2.8

8.72778E-81 4258.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.72286E-81 4275.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.7164IE-81 4388.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.71885E-81 4325.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1. 58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.78536E-81 4358.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.69995E-81 4375.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.69468E-81 4488.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.68933E-81 4425.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.68413E-81 4458.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1.38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 8.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.67988E-81 4475.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 13.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.67393E-81 4588.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
-1. 38 8.843 -9.888 8.828 -999. 21. 6.8 1.888 1.58 13.35 8.58 18.8 318.8 2.8

8.66894E-81 4525.88 8.88 5.8 Winter 8-368 18811881
418
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee lose e.3S e.se le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.664eeE-el 4sse.ee e.ee 5.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.65913E-el 4S7S.ee e.ee 5.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.66668E-el 46ee.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.66176E-el 462S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.6S6geE-el 46se.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e leelleel
-1. 3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 e.3S 0.50 le.e 310.0 2.e
e.652leE-el 467S.0e e .ee 0.e Winter e-360 le011eel
-1. 30 e.043 -9.0e0 e.02e -999. 21. 6.0 1.e00 1.50 e.3S e.S0 le.0 31e.e 2.e

0.64736E-01 47ee.00 e.ee e.e Winter e-360 10011eel
-1.30 e.e43 -9.0ee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.0 1.0e0 1.S0 e.3S e.S0 le.e 310.e 2.e

0.64268E-el 472S.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 10elleel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.0ee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 310.e 2.e
e.638e6E-01 47se.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 10011eel
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee e.e2e -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.e 310.e 2.e
e.63349E-el 477S.0e e.ee e.e Winter e-360 1001le01
-1. 30 0.e43 -9.e00 e.e20 -999. 21. 6.e l.eee loSe 0.35 0.50 le.e 31e.e 2.e
e.62899E-0l 48ee.ee e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 10011eel
-1. 30 e.043 -9.000 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.ee0 loSe e.3S 0.se le.e 31e.0 2.e

0.624S3E-el 4825.00 e.0e 0.0 Winter e-360 le011e01
-1. 30 e.043 -9.00e 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.e 1.e0e loSe e.3S 0.se le.0 31e.0 2.e
e.62e13E-el 48se.e0 e.ee e.e Winter e-36e 10011eel
-1. 30 0.e43 -9.00e 0.e20 -999. 21. 6.0 l.eee loSe e.3S e.se le.0 310.e 2.e

0.61S79E-0l 4875.00 e.ee e.0 Winter e-360 10011e01
-1.3e e.e43 -9.0e0 0.82e -999. 21. 6.0 1.e00 1.50 0.35 0.Se 10.0 310.0 2.0
e.611SeE-el 4988.0e 0.e8 e.e Winter 8-360 le0110el
-1.30 e.e43 -9.880 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.e00 1.50 e.3S e.S8 10.0 310.0 2.8

0.60725E-01 492S.ee e.ee 0.e Winter e-36e le8110el
-1.3e e.e43 -9.eee 8.82e -999. 21. 6.e 1.e00 1.50 e.3S e.S8 le.0 310.0 2.0
419

0.60306E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.59892E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0

0.59483E-01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001
-1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0
420
ISWAPEI Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
l itigation Support for the Environment
SOIL WATER AIR PROTECfION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 20 I
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education:

Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on VOC filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience:

Dr. Rosenfeld is the Co-Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SW APE). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling, oil spills, boilers, incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins, furans, volatile organics, semi-volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, MtBE, fuel oxygenates and odor. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs recommended by California Air Quality Management Districts.

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SW APE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctorallntern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H20 Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 - 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 -1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling Colorado 1990; Scientist october 2015 Rosenfeld CV
421
Publications:

Chen,1. A., Zapata, A R., Sutherland, A. 1., Molmen, D. R,. Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal oj Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks oJHazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook oj Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and DioxinslFurans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.1., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal oJEnvironmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook oj Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook oj Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, 1., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K .. , Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K .. , Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. 1. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Fornler Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105,194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5),345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5),335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing, Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel. Water Science and Technology.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, LH. (Mel) (2007). The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities. Water Science And Technology. october 2015 2 Rosenfeld CY
422
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., lJ. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6,2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application ofBiosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet LH. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), l71-l78.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29,1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4),247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses OfBiogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV
423
Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.c.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, AJ.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution . Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, AJ.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, c., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18,2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for DioxinlFuran, PAR, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 - 25,2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

October 2015 4 Rosenfeld CV
424
Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey's C8IPFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, P A.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Bromjnated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27,2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence ofPDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6,2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacranlento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids compo sting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants .. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. october 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV
425
Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10,2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington ..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids compo sting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

October 201 5 6 Rosenfeld CY
426
Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect ofbiosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on S1. Kitts in West Indies. 1993.
october 2015 7 Rosenfeld CY
427
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiffvs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et aI., Defendants Case No.: RGl4711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September, 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et aI., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et aI., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et aI., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et aI., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et aI." et aI., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et aI., Defendants Law No,: LALAI05144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et aI. v. Antero, et aI.

Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et aI. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. aI. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. aI. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et aI., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et aI. Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et ai, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et aI, Defendant.

Case Number cc-ll-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV
428
John Michael Abicht, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et aI., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. wi 2009 CV 100987)
Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina, County of Aiken David Anderson, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et aI., Defendants.

Case Number: 2007-CP-02-1584
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et aI., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides, State of Louisiana Roger Price, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Roy O. Martin, L.P., et aI., Defendants.

Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et aI., Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CVl 052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Chevron Oil Company, et aI., Defendants.

Case Number 1 :05 CV 227
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2008
In the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Caicasieu, State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabie, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et aI., Defendants.

Case Number 07-2738 G
In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish ofCaicasieu, State of Louisiana Leon B. Brydels, Plaintiffs, vs. Conoco, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Case Number 2004-6941 Division A
In the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 153rd Judicial District Linda Faust, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Witco Chemical Corporation AIKIA Witco Corporation, Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. and Koppers Industries, Inc., Defendants.

Case Number 153-212928-05
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006, October 2007
Rosenfeld Trial: January 2008
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs. Nutro Products, Inc., a California Corporation and DOES 1 to lOO, inclusive, Defendants.

John Loney, Plaintiff, vs. James H. Didion, Sr.; Nutro Products, Inc.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants.

Case Number VCVVS044671
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2009
Rosenfeld Trial: March 2010
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et aI., Plaintiffs, vs.lnternational Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
october 2015 9 Rosenfeld CV
429
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley, PlaintiffS, vs. Peter T. Hoss, as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration & Production Company, a Delaware corporation; Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.

Case Number SC094173
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008, October 2008
In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm, et ai., all individually, PlaintiffS, vs. Uno cal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Union Oil Company of California, a California corporation; Chevron Corporation, a California corporation; ConocoPhillips, a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation; and DOES 1 though 100, Defendants.

Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) Rosenfeld Deposition: January 2008
In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern District of Arkansas Harry Stephens Farms, Inc, and Harry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership, PlaintiffS, vs. Helena Chemical Company, and Exxon Mobil Corp., successor to Mobil Chemical Co., Defendants.

Case Number 2:06-CV-00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010
In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel, et aI., PlaintiffS, vs. Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants.

Civil Action Number 07-4037
Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010
Rosenfeld Trial: October 2010
In the District Court of Texas 21 sl Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Defendant.

Case Number 25,151
Rosenfeld Trial: May 2009
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassier, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, PlaintiffS, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.

Case 3: 10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013
In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et aI., PlaintiffS vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013
october 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV
430
I SWAP E ! Technical COl\Sdllaticn . ' Data Analysis and LiUgilion Sltpport 'OJ lite iSnvJI'OIlInent
'-------'
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Education:
1640 5th St., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887-9013
Email: [email protected]
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stonnwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQAReview
M.s. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.

Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 - 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H20 Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); 431
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001- 2004);
• Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, u.s. Envirorunental Protection Agency (1989- 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993- 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 -1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 -1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 -1986).

Senior Rewlatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SW APE, MaU's responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 envirorunental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of envirorunental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
2 432
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 3 433
• Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U .S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEP A to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
4 434
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal co1ll1sel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEP A, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions 1ll1der CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nationwide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 435
Geology:

With the u.s. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
6 436
Brown, A, Farrow, J., Gray, A and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meetin& Pechanga, CA
Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
7 437
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W ate r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPLcontaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 438
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention ... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011.
9 439

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
440

EXHIBIT B
441
SMlTH ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT
November 16, 2020
Mr. Michael Lozeau
Lozeau Drury
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94612
Subject: AMG Industrial Annexation Initial Study/Mitigated Declaration P 20025
Dear Mr. Lozeau:

At your request, I have reviewed traffic matters associated with the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (the"IS/MND") for proposed AMG Industrial Annexation Project (the "Project") totaling some 28.5 acres into the City of Los Banos (the "City").

My qualifications to perform this review include registration as a Civil and Traffic Engineer in California and over 50 years professional consulting engineering practice in the traffic and transportation industry. I have both prepared and performed adequacy reviews of numerous transportation and circulation sections of environmental impact reports prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). My professional resume is attached.

You requested me to assess traffic implications of change in land use from the current agricultural use to the industrial use per the zoning that would prevail under the annexation. My thoughts are summarized below.

The Annexation Action Does Not Include a Development Plan for the Site There is no specific current development plan for the site. But we can suggest some rough dimensions of the traffic implications of change from the current agricultural row crop use to uses conforming to Industrial zoning. For most of the year, except at harvest time, the current agricultural use generates negligible traffic. So all of the traffic of whatever use conforming to the industrial zoning is developed would be new traffic introduced to the street and highway system.

In the paragraphs that follow we rely on the authoritative transportation resource Trip Generation, 1dh Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.

As a starting point, we consider development corresponding to ITE Category 110, General Light Industrial. This category generates trips at rates of 4.98 per thousand T R ,\ I' I' I <: • T R .\ N S i' \) R T .-\ Till '" • 1\1 A NAG E 1\1 1.: r-.; T 5311 Lowl';' Road. Union City. CA 94587 tel: 510.489.9477 1X: 5IO.·HN.947t-1 442
Mr. Michael Lozeau
November 16, 2020

Page 2 ends

square feet ("TSF") of floor area for daily trips, 0.7 per TSF in the AM peak and 0.83 per TSF in the PM peak. The 28.5 acres translates to 1,241,438 square feet so, development as single story buildings at 30 percent site coverage would be 372.438 TSF floor area which would generate 1856 new trips daily, 261 in the AM peak and 309 in the PM peak. Of course, buildings could be built at higher site coverage percentages or perhaps in some instances with more than a single story so the potential square feet of floor area and the consequent net new trips could be considerably higher.

Other uses that could be developed on land zoned industrial that have lower trip generation rates than the above include Category 150 Warehouse (conventional) and Category 154 High Cube Transload Warehouse. However, the lower trip generation rates of these types of use partially offset by being developed at very high site coverage percentages and the fact that the truck trips they generate translate to high passenger car equivalencies. Other types of specialty warehouses such as Category 155 Fulfillment Center Category 156 Parcel Hub have trip generation rates comparable to the Category 110 General Light Industrial and tend to be developed at very high site coverage percentages.

Conclusion
While it is difficult to place a hard traffic estimate on a site that does not have an explicit development plan, it is clear that if the site is fully developed in uses that conform to the industrial zoning, it is clear that the development would generate numbers of trips that would be consequential in the area. Therefore, a traffic impact study should be done.

Sincerely,
Smith Engineering & Management
A California Corporation
Daniel T. Smith Jr., P.E.

President
Attachment 1
Resume of Daniel T. Smith Jr., P.E.

T R A I' FIe • T R .. \ N S I' L) R TAT I L) ~ • 1\1 A N ~ G E 1\1 E 1'.' T 5311 Lowr;' Road. Union Cit;" CA 94587 tel: 510.489.9477 fax: 5IO ... HN.9478 443
Mr. Michael Lozeau
November 16,2020

Page 3 ends

DANIEL T. SMITH, Jr.

President

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, 1967 Master of Science, Transportation Planning, University of California, Berkeley, 1968

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
California No. 21913 (Civil) Nevada No. 7969 (Civil, Ret.) Washington No. 29337 (Civil, Ret.) California No. 938 (Traffic) Arizona No. 22131 (Civil, Ret.)

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Smith Engineering & Management, 1993 to present. President.

OKS Associates, 1979 to 1993. Founder, Vice President, Principal Transportation Engineer.

De Leuw, Cather & Company, 1968 to 1979. Senior Transportation Planner.

Personal specialties and project experience include:

Litigation Consulting. Provides consultation, investigations and expert witness testimony in highway design, transit design and traffic engineering matters including condemnations involving transportation access issues; traffic accidents involving highway design or traffic engineering factors; land use and development matters involving access and transportation impacts; parking and other traffic and transportation matters.

Urban Corridor Studies/Alternatives Analysis. Principal-in-charge for State Route (SR) 102 Feasibility Study, a 35-mile freeway alignment study north of Sacramento. Consultant on 1-280 Interstate Transfer Concept Program, San Francisco, an AAlEIS for completion of 1-280, demolition of Embarcadero freeway, substitute light rail and commuter rail projects. Principal-in-charge, SR 238 corridor freeway/expressway design/environmental study, Hayward (Calif.). Project manager, Sacramento Northeast Area multi-modal transportation corridor study. Transportation planner for 1-80N West Terminal Study, and Harbor Drive Traffic Study, Portland, Oregon. Project manager for design of surface segment of Woodward Corridor LRT, Detroit, Michigan. Directed staff on 1-80 National Strategic Corridor Study (Sacramento-San Francisco), US 101-Sonoma freeway operations study, SR 92 freeway operations study, 1-880 freeway operations study, SR 152 alignment studies, Sacramento RTD light rail systems study, Tasman Corridor LRT AAlEIS, Fremont-Warm Springs BART extension plan/EIR, SRs 70/99 freeway alternatives study, and Richmond Parkway (SR 93) design study.

Area Transportation Plans. Principal-in charge for transportation element of City of Los Angeles General Plan Framework, shaping nations largest city two decades into 21 'st century. Project manager for the transportation element of 300-acre Mission Bay development in downtown San Francisco.

Mission Bay involves 7 million gsf office/commercial space, 8,500 dwelling units, and community facilities. Transportation features include relocation of commuter rail station; extension of MUNI-Metro LRT; a multi-modal terminal for LRT, commuter rail and local bus; removal of a quarter mile elevated freeway; replacement by new ramps and a boulevard; an internal roadway network overcoming constraints imposed by an internal tidal basin; freeway structures and rail facilities; and concept plans for 20,000 structured parking spaces. Principal-in-charge for circulation plan to accommodate 9 million gsf of office/commercial growth in downtown Bellevue (Wash.). Principal-in-charge for 64 acre, 2 million gsf multi-use complex for FMC adjacent to San Jose International Airport. Project manager for transportation element of Sacramento Capitol Area Plan for the state governmental complex, and for Downtown Sacramento. Redevelopment Plan. Project manager for Napa (Calif.) General Plan Circulation Element and Downtown, Riverfront Redevelopment Plan, on parking program for downtown Walnut Creek, on downtown transportation plan for San Mateo and redevelopment plan for downtown Mountain View (Calif.), for traffic circulation and safety, plans for California cities of Davis, Pleasant Hill and Hayward, and for Salem, Oregon.
or R A I' I' I c: • T R 0\ N :-; I' L) R T .. \ Till '" • 1\1 A N /\ G E 1\1 E 1': T 5311 L()wr~' Road. Union Cit~·. CA 94587 tel: 510.489.9477 f,n: 510.489.9.J.78 444
Mr. Michael Lozeau
November 16, 2020

Page 4 ends

Transportation Centers. Project manager for Daly City Intermodal Study which developed a $7 million surface bus terminal, traffic access, parking and pedestrian circulation improvements at the Daly City BART station plus development of functional plans for a new BART station at Colma. Project manager for design of multi-modal terminal (commuter rail, light rail, bus) at Mission Bay, San Francisco. In Santa Clarita Long Range Transit
Development Program, responsible for plan to relocate system's existing timed-transfer hub and development of three satellite transfer hubs. Performed airport ground transportation system evaluations for San Francisco International, Oakland International, Sea-Tac International, Oakland International, Los Angeles International, and San Diego Lindberg.

Campus Transportation. Campus transportation planning assignments for UC Davis, UC Berkeley, UC Santa Cruz and UC San Francisco Medical Center campuses; San Francisco State University; University of San Francisco; and the University of Alaska and others. Also developed master plans for institutional campuses including medical centers, headquarters complexes and research & development facilities.

Special Event Facilities. Evaluations and design studies for football/baseball stadiums, indoor sports arenas, horse and motor racing facilities, theme parks, fairgrounds and convention centers, ski complexes and destination resorts throughout western United States.

Parking. Parking programs and facilities for large area plans and individual sites including downtowns, special event facilities, university and institutional campuses and other large site developments; numerous parking feasibility and operations studies for parking structures and surface facilities; also, resident preferential parking.

Transportation System Management & Traffic Restraint. Project manager on FHWA program to develop techniques and guidelines for neighborhood street traffic limitation. Project manager for Berkeley, (Calif.), Neighborhood Traffic Study, pioneered application of traffic restraint techniques in the U.S. Developed residential traffic plans for Menlo Park, Santa Monica, Santa Cruz, Mill Valley, Oakland, Palo Alto, Piedmont, San Mateo County, Pasadena, Santa Ana and others. Participated in development of photo/radar speed enforcement device and experimented with speed humps. Coauthor of Institute of Transportation Engineers reference publication on neighborhood traffic control.

Bicycle Facilities. Project manager to develop an FHWA manual for bicycle facility design and planning, on bikeway plans for Del Mar, (Calif.), the UC Davis and the City of Davis. Consultant to bikeway plans for Eugene, Oregon, Washington, D.C., Buffalo, New York, and Skokie, Illinois.

Consultant to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for development of hydraulically efficient, bicycle safe drainage inlets. Consultant on FHWA research on effective retrofits of undercrossing and overcrossing structures for bicyclists, pedestrians, and handicapped.

MEMBERSHIPS
Institute of Transportation Engineers Transportation Research Board

PUBLICATIONS AND AWARDS
Residential Street Design and Traffic Control, with W. Homburger et al. Prentice Hall, 1989.

Co-recipient, Progressive Architecture Citation, Mission Bay Master Plan, with I.M. Pei WRT Associated, 1984.

Residential Traffic Management, State of the Art Report, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1979.

Improving The Residential Street Environment, with Donald Appleyard et aI., U.S. Department of Transportation,1979.

Strategic Concepts in Residential Neighborhood Traffic Control, International Symposium on Traffic Control Systems, Berkeley, California, 1979.

Planning and Design of Bicycle Facilities: Pitfalls and New Directions, Transportation Research Board, Research Record 570, 1976.

Co-recipient, Progressive Architecture Award, Livable Urban Streets, San Francisco Bay Area and London, with Donald Appleyard, 1979 .
. 1' R ,\ l' I; 1 <: • T R .\ N S I'l) R T .. \ TIL) '" • 1\1 A NAG E!'-I E N T 5311 LOWT\' Road. Union Cit\·. CA 945S7 td: 510.489.9477 fax: 5ItH~9.9.j.78 . . 445

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
446
of Merced County
November 16, 2020
Stacy Souza Elms
Community and Economic Development Director
City of Los Banos
520 J Street
Los Banos, CA 93635
Local Agency Formation Commission
2222 M Street
Merced, CA 95340
Phone (209) 385-7671 / Fax (209) 726-1710
www.lafcomerced.org
RE: AMG Annexation to the City of Los Banos Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Annexation and PreZone 2013-01
Thank you for providing a copy of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the AMG Annexation and PreZone application and related Pre-Annexation Development Agreement to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Merced County (LAFCO). This is a revised document from one prepared and adopted by the City back in 2014. LAFCO had not been provided a copy of that earlier CEQA document, and the City has since prepared a Subsequent EIR to the General Plan EIR addressing some errors in the agricultural resources evaluation for the 2030 General Plan. As I understand it, this Draft IS/MND incorporates the updated General Plan Subsequent EIR, and updates the analysis for this 28.5 acre annexation.

The project site is designated "Industrial" in the City's General Plan and is Pre-zoned "General Industrial" (I). The current County land use designation is "City Planning Area - Agricultural" and the Zoning is "General Agricultural" (A-1). There is no pending or proposed use for this property, and annexation is being pursued to enable the property to be developed in the City at some future time for some type of warehousing and distribution use(s). LAFCO has reviewed the IS/MND and is providing comments in specific areas of potential impact, as indicated below.

Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Checklist Item 2a indicates that the site consists of 28.5 acres Prime Farmland, but the level of impact is identified as "Less Than Significant" although the reasoning for this conclusion is not very clear. The text in the third paragraph on Page 19 indicates uThe proposed project is within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Los Banos, and therefore, has been planned for eventual annexation into the City of Los Banos ... " This statement does not diminish the significance of the resulting conversion of prime farmland. The City adopted Mitigation Measure AG-1 as part of the General Plan Subsequent EIR, but this only applies to annexations over 50 acres in size. There is no evaluation or justification why the conversion of a 28.5 acre parcel consisting of prime farmland under cultivation, is not a significant impact. The County of Merced has established a minimum agricultural parcel size of 20 acres, and therefore, to assume parcels less than 50 acres are not viable farming parcels is not supported in the IS/MND. If mitigation is not required through a mitigation measure to obtain a conservation easement on other farmland of similar quality, a Statement of Overriding Considerations should be adopted for this project.

As a general reference, in LAFCO's role addressing conversion of important farmland, historically annexations into urban sewer and water districts located in unincorporated urban communities (like Delhi, Hilmar and Planada) would include agricultural mitigation as part of the CEQA document adopted by the County based on policy in the 2030 Merced County General Plan. 447
Stacy Souza
Community and Economic Development Director
City of Los Banos
AMG Annexation IS/MND Comments
November 16, 2020

Page 2 ends

In the Commission's role as a "Responsible Agency" under CEQA, LAFCO would also adopt the mitigation requirement when annexing this land into the respective urban sewer and water district. However, in 2017, Merced LAFCO processed the first city-initiated annexation within the County involving a requirement for agricultural mitigation: the Ferrari Project annexation to the City of Atwater. More typically, when a city certifies an EIR without adopting mitigation for farmland conversion, LAFCO will adopt a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" based on considerations and findings identified by the City.

As a final comment on this CEQA Checklist topic, Merced LAFCOs adopted Goals & Policies (Section III) factors "a" through "c" under Policy 7, which includes consideration to identify the amount of vacant land already within the City that can accommodate similar types of development over a 10-year time frame, identify whether the project impacts prime agricultural land, and identify measures to protect adjacent farmlands. While City Mitigation Measure AG-1 covers some of this analysis, the IS/MND indicates the mitigation does not apply to projects below 50 acres in size. In any event, the LAFCO annexation application form will seek this type of information to satisfy this policy.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Under Impact 10b on Page 48, the Initial study cites the General Plan EIR as concluding the City has sufficient water supplies to meet the needs of the City through 2030. No mitigation measures are required.

While this conclusion may be accurate, the IS/MND makes no reference to the recently adopted North/Central Delta-Mendota Groundwater Sustainability Plan for this portion of the Delta Mendota Subbasin. If there are any implications for the City's earlier conclusion in the General Plan, this IS/MND should reference them.

Land Use
The analysis under Impact 11a and b correctly identify the characteristics of the annexation area, including the presence of exiting urban development within the City adjactnt to the east, south and west, and confirming that the project site is within the City General Plan and Sphere of Influence boundaries.

Public Services
LAFCO Staff acknowledges that the IS/MND identifies that impacts to the following public services will be addressed by requiring future developers to pay appropriate "capital facility fees" such as for fire (Page 56), Police (Page 58), and Schools as required by SB 50 (Page 58).

Traffic
Due to the lack of a specific development project within the annexation area, the City did not identify any traffic impacts and will defer the analysis until specific projects are proposed and permitted should the annexation be approved. For a site surrounded by existing industrial and residential development already within the City limits, this deferral of analysis may be acceptable, but it is possible to evaluate potential traffic impacts by preparing a traffic study based on the PreZoning designation, and corresponding density and intensity of typical industrial development.

X:\LAFCO\APPS\0673 - AMG Annexation to Los Banos\AMG IS-MND Comments111620.docx 448
Stacy Souza
Community and Economic Development Director
City of Los Banos
AMG Annexation IS/MND Comments
November 16, 2020

Page 3 ends

Closing
Again, thank you for providing this Draft IS/MND for LAFCOs review. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Bill Nicholson, via e-mail at [email protected] or by phone at (209) 385-7671.

Sincerely,
'1$/11 !tttl"".fL-_
Bill Nicholson
Executive Officer
cc: Merced LAFCO Commissioners
LAFCO Counsel
X:\LAFCOIAPPS\0673 - AMG Annexation to Los BanoslAMG IS-MND Comments111620.docx 449

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
450
ATTACHMENT 4
Memorandum
Responses to Comments on the Annexation and Pre-Zone 2013-01 and Pre-Annexation Development Agreement - AMG Industrial
Date November 23, 2021
To Stacy Souza Elms, Community and Economic Development Director From Mark Niskanen, Vice President, J.B. Anderson Land Use Planning Subject Annexation and Pre-Zone 2013-01 and Pre-Annexation Development Agreement - AMG Industrial Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Response to Comments
This memorandum includes comments received during the circulation of the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the Annexation and Pre-Zone 2013-01 and Pre-Annexation Development Agreement - AMG Industrial.

The IS-MND was circulated for a thirty (30) day public review period, and the public review period began on October 16, 2020, and ended on November 16, 2020. The City of Los Banos received five (5) comment letters on the Draft IS/MND during the public review period and three comments after the end of the review period. The commenters and the page number on which each com menter's letter appear are listed below.

Letter No. and Commenter Page
No.

A Mr. Gavin McCreary, Department of Toxic Substances Control 2-3 B Ms. Monique Wilber, Department of Conservation 4-5
C Mr. Bill Nicholson, Merced LAFCO 6-8
D Mr. Michael R. Lozeau, Lozeau Drury, LLP 9-24
E Mr. Michael R. Lozeau, Lozeau Drury, LLP 25
1 451
ATTACHMENT 4
Table 1
Response to Comments
Annexation and Pre-Zone 2013-01 and Pre-Annexation Development Agreement - AMG Industrial Comment Letter A - Mr. Gavin McCreary, Department of Toxic Substances Control A.1 The MND should acknowledge the potential for historic or future activities As discussed in the Initial Study, future activities will be on or near the project site to result in the release of hazardous determined concurrent to the proposal of a specific wastes/substances on the project site. In instances in which releases have development project. At this time, the "Project" occurred or may occur, further studies should be carried out to delineate the consists of annexation only. No new development is nature and extent of the contamination, and the potential threat to public proposed. health and/or the environment should be evaluated. The MND should also identify the mechanism(s) to initiate any required investigation and/or remediation and the government agency who will be responsible for providing appropriate regulatory oversight.

A.2 Refiners in the United States started adding lead compounds to gasoline in As discussed in the Initial Study, future activities will be the 1920s in order to boost octane levels and improve engine performance. determined concurrent to the proposal of a specific This practice did not officially end until 1992 when lead was banned as a fuel development project. At this time, the "Project" additive in California. Tailpipe emissions from automobiles using leaded consists of annexation only. No new development is gasoline contained lead and resulted in aerially deposited lead (ADL) being proposed. deposited in and along roadways throughout the state. ADL-contaminated soils still exist along roadsides and medians and can also be found underneath some existing road surfaces due to past construction activities.

Due to the potential for ADL-contaminated soil DTSC, recommends collecting soil samples for lead analysis prior to performing any intrusive activities for the project described in the MND.

A.3 If any sites within the project area or sites located within the vicinity of the As discussed in the Initial Study, future activities will be project have been used or are suspected of having been used for mining determined concurrent to the proposal of a specific activities, proper investigation for mine waste should be discussed in the development project. At this time, the "Project" MND. DTSC recommends that any project sites with current and/or former consists of annexation only. No new development is mining operations onsite or in the project site area should be evaluated for proposed. 2 452
1'1 I.

III
A.4
ATTACHMENT 4
mine waste according to DTSC's 1998 Abandoned Mine Land Mines Preliminary Assessment Handbook (https:/Idtsc.ca.gov/ wpcontent/ uploads/ sites/ 31/ 2018/ 11/ a m I ha nd book. pdf).

If buildings or other structures are to be demolished on any project sites The Project site is vacant and undeveloped. There are included in the proposed project, surveys should be conducted for the no structures located on site that would be demolished presence of lead-based paints or products, mercury, asbestos containing as part of the Proposed Project. materials, and polychlorinated biphenyl caulk. Removal, demolition and disposal of any of the above-mentioned chemicals should be conducted in compliance with California environmental regulations and policies. In addition, sampling near current and/or former buildings should be conducted in accordance with DTSC's 2006 Interim Guidance Evaluation of School Sites with Potential Contamination from Lead Based Paint, Termiticides, and Electrical Transformers
(https:/ /dtsc.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/sites/31/2018/09/Guidance_Lead_ Contamination_OSOl18.pdf).

A.S If any projects initiated as part of the proposed project require the The import/export of soil needed as part of any specific importation of soil to backfill any excavated areas, proper sampling should development project will be evaluated at the time a be conducted to ensure that the imported soil is free of contamination. DTSC specific development project is proposed. At this time, recommends the imported materials be characterized according to DTSC's the "Project" consists of annexation only. No new A.6
3 2001 Information Advisory Clean Imported Fill Material development is proposed. (https://dtsc.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/ sites/31/2018/09/SM P JS _ Clea nfill-Schoo Is. pdf).

If any sites included as part of the proposed project have been used for As discussed in the Initial Study, future activities will be agricultural, weed abatement or related activities, proper investigation for determined concurrent to the proposal of a specific organochlorinated pesticides should be discussed in the MND. DTSC development project. At this time, the "Project" recommends the current and former agricultural lands be evaluated in consists of annexation only. No new development is accordance with DTSC's 2008 Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural proposed.

Properties (Third Revision) (https://dtsc.ca.gov/wpcontent/u ploads/ sites/31/2018/09/ Ag-G uida nce-Rev-3-August -7 -2008-

2.pdf).
453
III
II'
ATIACHMENT4
Comment letter No. B - Ms. Monique Wilber, Department of Conservation B.1
4 Although conversion of agricultural land is often an unavoidable impact The commenter is providing information and under CEQA analysis, feasible alternatives and/or feasible mitigation recommendations regarding agricultural mitigation measures must be considered. In some cases, the argument is made that measures. As discussed in the Initial Study, the mitigation cannot reduce impacts to below the level of significance because "Project" is less than 50-acres in size, and therefore, agricultural land will still be converted by the project, and therefore, the Project is not required to comply with the City's mitigation is not required. However, reduction to a level below significance General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AG-1. is not a criterion for mitigation under CEQA. Rather, the criterion is feasible mitigation that lessens a project's impacts. As stated in CEQA statue, mitigation may also include, "Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments, including through permanent protection of such resources in the form of conservation easements."
The conversion of agricultural land represents a permanent reduction in the State's agricultural land resources. As such, the Department advises the use of permanent agricultural conservation easements on land of at least equal quality and size as partial compensation for the loss of agricultural land.

Conservation easements are an available mitigation tool and considered a standard practice in many areas of the State. The Department highlights conservation easements because of their acceptance and use by lead agencies as an appropriate mitigation measure under CEQA and because it follows an established rationale similar to that of wildlife habitat mitigation.

Mitigation via agricultural conservation easements can be implemented by at least two alternative approaches: the outright purchase of easements or the donation of mitigation fees to a local, regional, or statewide organization or agency whose purpose includes the acquisition and stewardship of agricultural conservation easements. The conversion of agricultural land should be deemed an impact of at least regional significance. Hence, the search for replacement lands should not be limited strictly to lands within the project's surrounding area.
454
II
B.2
IIJ
5 ATTACHMENT 4
A source that has proven helpful for regional and statewide agricultural mitigation banks is the California Council of Land Trusts. They provide helpful insight into farmland mitigation policies and implementation strategies, including a guidebook with model policies and a model local ordinance. The guidebook can be found at:
http:U www.calandtrusts.org!resources! conserving-californias-harvestl Of course, the use of conservation easements is only one form of mitigation that should be considered. Any other feasible mitigation measures should also be considered.

The Department recommends further discussion of the following issues:
• Type, amount, and location offarmland conversion resulting directly and indirectly from implementation of the proposed project. • Impacts on any current and future agricultural operations in the vicinity; e.g., land-use conflicts, increases in land values and taxes, loss of agricultural support infrastructure such as processing facilities, etc.
• Incremental impacts leading to cumulative impacts on agricultural land. This would include impacts from the proposed project, as well as impacts from past, current, and likely future projects. • Proposed mitigation measures for all impacted agricultural lands within the proposed project area.

The commenter is providing information and
recommendations regarding agricultural mitigation
measures. As discussed in the Initial Study, the
"Project" is less than 50-acres in size, and therefore, the Project is not required to comply with the City's
General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AG-l.
455
ATIACHMENT4
Comment Letter No. C - Mr. Bill Nicholson, Merced LAFCO C.1
6 Checklist Item 2a indicates that the site consists of 28.5 acres Prime Farmland, but the level of impact is identified as "Less Than Significant" although the reasoning for this conclusion is not very clear. The text in the third paragraph on Page 19 indicates "The proposed project is within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Los Banos, and therefore, has been planned for eventual annexation into the City of los Banos ... " This statement does not diminish the significance of the resulting conversion of prime farmland. The City adopted Mitigation Measure AG-1 as part ofthe General Plan Subsequent EIR, but this only applies to annexations over 50 acres in size. There is no evaluation or justification why the conversion of a

28.5 acre parcel consisting of prime farmland under cultivation, is not a significant impact. The County of Merced . has established a minimum agricultural parcel size of 20 acres, and therefore, to assume parcels less than 50 acres are not viable farming parcels is not supported in the IS/MND. If mitigation is not required through a mitigation measure to obtain a conservation easement on other farmland of similar quality, a Statement of Overriding Considerations should be adopted for this project.

As a general reference, in lAFCO's role addressing conversion of important farmland, historically annexations into urban sewer and water districts located in unincorporated urban communities (like Delhi, Hilmar and Planada) would include agricultural mitigation as part ofthe CEQA document adopted by the County based on policy in the 2030 Merced County General Plan.

In the Commission's role as a "Responsible Agency" under CEQA, LAFCO would also adopt the mitigation requirement when annexing this land into the respective urban sewer and water district. However, in 2017, Merced lAFCO processed the first city-initiated annexation within the County involving a requirement for agricultural mitigation: the Ferrari Project annexation to the City of Atwater. More typically, when a city certifies an EIR without adopting mitigation for farmland conversion, LAFCO will adopt a As discussed in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources
section of the Initial Study, the Project is not required to comply with the City's adopted General Plan EIR
Mitigation Measure AG-1, as the Project site is less
than 50-acres in size. Furthermore, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is required to adhere to the Policies of the 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the
agricultural impacts associated with the 2030 General
Plan and 2017 General Plan Amendment to the land
Resources Element were determined to be Significant
and unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above,
a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Consideration was adopted by the City.
456
C2
C3
C.4
7 ATTACHMENT 4
"Statement of Overriding Considerations" based on considerations and findings identified by the City.

As a final comment on this CEQA Checklist topic, Merced LAFCOs adopted Goals & Policies (Section III) factors "a" through "c" under Policy 7, which includes consideration to identify the amount of vacant land already within the City that can accommodate similar types of development over a 10-year time frame, identify whether the project impacts prime agricultural land, and identify measures to protect adjacent farmlands. While City Mitigation Measure AG-l covers some of this analysis, the IS/MND indicates the mitigation does not apply to projects below 50 acres in size. In any event, the LAFCO annexation application form will seek this type of information to satisfy this policy.

Under Impact 10 b on Page 48, the Initial study cites the General Plan EIR as concluding the City has sufficient water supplies to meet the needs of the City through 2030. No mitigation measures are required. While this conclusion may be accurate, the IS/MND makes no reference to the recently adopted North/Central Delta-Mendota Groundwater Sustainability Plan for this portion of the Delta Mendota Subbasin. If there are any implications for the City's earlier conclusion in the General Plan, this IS/MND should reference them.

The analysis under Impact 11 a and b correctly identify the characteristics of the annexation area, including the presence of exiting urban development within the City adjacent to the east, south and west, and confirming that the project site is within the City General Plan and Sphere of Influence boundaries.

LAFCO Staff acknowledges that the IS/MND identifies that impacts to the following public services will be addressed by requiring future developers to pay appropriate "capital facility fees" such as for fire (Page 56), Police (Page 58), and Schools as required by S8 50 (Page 58).

Comment noted. At the time a specific development
project is proposed for this site, the specific
development project's potential impact on
groundwater will be evaluated.

Comment noted. The commenter states the Initial
Study correctly identified the characteristics of the
annexation area.

Comment noted. The commenter states the Initial
Study acknowledges that any project developed within
the Project site will need to pay the applicable capital facility fees.
457
ATTACHMENT 4
C.5 Due to the lack of a specific development project within the annexation area, Comment noted. The commenter acknowledges that the City did not identify any traffic impacts and will defer the analysis until deferring site specific traffic analysis at the time a site specific projects are proposed and permitted should the annexation be specific development project is proposed is warranted. approved. For a site surrounded by existing industrial and residential development already within the City limits, this deferral of analysis may be acceptable, but it is possible to evaluate potential traffic impacts by preparing a traffic study based on the PreZoning designation, and corresponding density and intensity of typical industrial development.

Comment Letter No. D - Mr. Michael R. Lozeau, Lozeau Drury, LLP 8 458
ATIACHMENT4
D.1 The City's proposed pre-zone and authorization of the annexation must Comment noted. As discussed in the Initial Study, address the reasonably foreseeable indirect physical changes that will result further environmental review in accordance with CEQA by ultimately changing the site from its current agricultural zoning to the Statutes and Guidelines will be required at the time a city's proposed industrial zoning. The City's industrial zoning would open the specific development project is proposed for this site. site up to a variety of potential industrial uses. Although the City may not D.2
D.3
9 know the precise development projects that will be proposed for the site, it is incumbent upon the City to acknowledge the likely industrial development that will occur. The City's zoning code will permit the site to include, for example, a distribution center, warehousing or truck terminals.

Los Banos Municipal Code § 9-3.1502. Although the City will have an opportunity to review future site plans for specific development proposals, that does not mean the City does not need to provide a reasonable projection of the levels and types of use to which the site's industrial zoning will lead.

The MND is silent as to the likely development that will ensue from the annexation and pre-zoning. As a result, there is no effort in the MND to discuss any impacts from that likely development. As a result, the MND on its face is deficient as a matter of law.

The MND is in support of a pre-annexation development agreement that the City proposes to approve. However, nothing in the MND describes the terms of the development agreement. Nor is a draft of the agreement attached to the MND. Accordingly, the project description is insufficient.

The City's failure to address the potential impacts of the site's likely development, deficiencies in the MND's analysis, and substantial evidence provided by qualified experts establishes a fair argument that the Project may have significant environmental impacts requiring the preparation of an EIR.

Comment noted. As noted in the Initial Study, the
Project Description notes the Proposed Project
includes a Pre-Annexation Agreement. The intent of
the Pre-Annexation Agreement is to provide provisions
for annexation timing, and funding for City staff time
associated with the proposed annexation.

Comment noted. As discussed in the Initial Study,
further environmental review in accordance with
CEQA Statutes and Guidelines will be required at the
time a specific development project is proposed for
this site.
459
D.4
D.5
10 ATTACHMENT 4
The analysis of farmland impacts is flawed for numerous reasons, including the MND's failure to properly weigh the County's current zoning of the site as agricultural and the illogical reliance on the General Plan's finding that because farmland impacts are significant and unavoidable under the City's General Plan, the destruction of the parcel's 28.5 acres of prime farmland is not significant.

The initial study questionnaire poses the question I/[w]ould the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use ... ?" MND, p. 19. The MND then provides this confusing response to this question:

The Proposed Project is located on existing agricultural land and is bounded by primarily industrial, agricultural, and residential uses. The Project Site located within Merced County is zoned for agricultural uses. The Proposed Project includes an Annexation and Pre-Zoning into the City of Los Banos. The zoning district being proposed as a part of the Proposed Project's Pre-Zoning is Industrial (I) and future development within the Proposed Project area will be consistent with the City's I zoning district. Therefore, the Proposed Project will have No Impact.

Id. It simply defies logic to state that a parcel currently zoned agricultural and proposed to be changed to an industrial zone does not conflict with the existing zoning. If the rationale behind the response is that there would be no conflict with the existing zoning because the proposal is to change the existing zoning, that rationale fails to respond to the question. The future proposed zoning of industrial conflicts with the existing zoning of Comment noted. As discussed in the Agriculture and
Forestry Resources section of the Initial Study, the
Project is not required to comply with the City's
adopted General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure AG-l, as
the Project site is less than 50-acres in size.

Furthermore, as discussed in the Initial Study, the
Project is required to adhere to the Policies ofthe 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the agricultural impacts
associated with the 2030 General Plan and 2017
General Plan Amendment to the Land Resources
Element were determined to be significant and
unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above, a
Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Consideration was adopted by the City.

As discussed in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources
section of the Initial Study, the Project is not required to comply with the City's adopted General Plan EIR
Mitigation Measure AG-l, as the Project site is less
than 50-acres in size. Furthermore, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is required to adhere to the Policies of the 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the
agricultural impacts associated with the 2030 General
Plan and 2017 General Plan Amendment to the Land
Resources Element were determined to be significant
and unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above,
a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Consideration was adopted by the City.
460

0.6 0.7
11 ATTACHMENT 4
agricultural. Because the City cannot rationally answer this question in the negative, a fair argument exists - indeed it's guaranteed - that the Project may have a significant environmental impact from the change in zoning from agricultural to industrial.

Equally illogical is the MND's claim that because, in certifying the Subsequent EIR for an amendment to the General Plan in 2017, the City determined that the planned loss of 7,945 acres of farmland by development within the City's sphere of influence was significant and unavoidable means the loss of the Project's 28.5 acres is therefore insignificant. MND, p. 18. Obviously, at a minimum, the loss of this parcel of farmland has significant cumulative impacts when considered in the context ofthe entire 7,945 acres offarmland slated to be developed by the City. Mitigation Measure AG-l adopted with the 2017 SEIR does not eliminate the significant impact to farmland. See SEIR, p. 2-2. Indeed, it does not even apply to the Project given its trigger of a 50- acre parcel to be converted. Likewise, the original 2007 EIR for the General Plan also does not provide any mitigations applicable to the Project. 2077 General Plan EIR, p. E-l1. Indeed, the thrust of the mitigation is to avoid converting any more than the acres that will be converted by this General Plan. Of course, the impact itself cannot rationally amount to a mitigation of that impact.

Because ofthe inapplicability of any of the mitigation set forth in the General Plan EIRs as well as the general ineffectiveness the measures had or will have on mitigating conversions of farmland within the City's sphere of influence, the City cannot now rely on those prior EIRs to claim it has already addressed the farmland impacts of this Project. Section 15152(f) provides in relevant part: (3) Significant environmental effects have been "adequately addressed" if the lead agency determines that:
(A) they have been mitigated or avoided as a result of the prior environmental impact report and findings adopted in connection with that As discussed in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources
section of the Initial Study, the Project is not required to comply with the City's adopted General Plan EIR
Mitigation Measure AG-l, as the Project site is less
than 50-acres in size. Furthermore, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is required to adhere to the Policies of the 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the
agricultural impacts associated with the 2030 General
Plan and 2017 General Plan Amendment to the Land
Resources Element were determined to be significant
and unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above,
a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Consideration was adopted by the City.

As discussed in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources
section of the Initial Study, the Project is not required to comply with the City's adopted General Plan EIR
Mitigation Measure AG-l, as the Project site is less
than 50-acres in size. Furthermore, as discussed in the Initial Study, the Project is required to adhere to the Policies of the 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the
agricultural impacts associated with the 2030 General
Plan and 2017 General Plan Amendment to the Land
prior environmental report; or I Resources Element were determined to be significant (B) they have been examined at a sufficient level of detail in the prior and unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above, environmental impact report to enable those effects to be mitigated or 461
ATIACHMENT4
avoided by site specific revisions, the imposition of conditions, or by other I a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding means in connection with the approval of the later project. Consideration was adopted by the City. 14 Cal. Admin. Code § 15152{f}. The City cannot make either of the necessary determinations to avoid preparing a subsequent tiered EIR for the Project.

The Project's effects on farmland are not mitigated at all by Mitigation Measure AG-1. It does not even apply. Similarly, there are no site specific revisions to the Project, conditions or any other means included in the proposed Project. As a result, a subsequent EIR must be prepared to address the Project's conversion of 28.5 acres of important farmland.

0.8 In addition, given the City's prior certification that the General Plan's As discussed in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources conversion of farmland, including the Project site, was a significant and section of the Initial Study, the Project is not required unavoidable impact, the City cannot avoid recertifying that determination for to comply with the City'S adopted General Plan EIR this Project and whether or not additional specific mitigations can either Mitigation Measure AG-1, as the Project site is less mitigate or avoid the admitted impact. Under CEQA, when an agency than 50-acres in size. Furthermore, as discussed in the approves a project with significant environmental impacts that will not be Initial Study, the Project is required to adhere to the fully mitigated, it must adopt a "statement of overriding considerations" Policies of the 2030 General Plan. Ultimately, the finding that, because of the project's overriding benefits, it is approving the agricultural impacts associated with the 2030 General project despite its environmental harm. 14 Cal.Code Regs. §15043; Pub. Res. Plan and 2017 General Plan Amendment to the Land Code §21081{b}; Sierra Club v. Contra Costa County {1992} 10 Cal.App.4th Resources Element were determined to be significant 1212, 1222. A statement of overriding considerations expresses the "larger, and unavoidable, and as such and as discussed above, more general reasons for approving the project, such as the need to create a Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding new jobs, provide housing, generate taxes and the like." Concerned Citizens Consideration was adopted by the City. 12 of South Central LA v. Los Angeles Unif. Sch. Dist. {1994} 24 Cal.App.4th 826, 847.

An agency may adopt a statement of overriding considerations only after it has imposed all feasible mitigation measures to reduce a project's impact to less than significant levels. 14 Cal.Code Regs. §§ 15126.4, 15091. CEQA prohibits agencies from approving projects with significant environmental impacts when feasible mitigation measures can substantially lessen or avoid such impacts. Pub. Res. Code § 21002. As explained in CEQA Guidelines § 15092{b)(2}, an agency is prohibited from approving a project unless it has 462
13 ATTACHMENT 4
"[e]liminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible."
A statement of overriding considerations must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. 14 Cal.Code Regs. §15093(b); Sierra Club v. Contra Costa Co., 10 Cal.App.4th at 1223. The agency must make "a fully informed and publicly disclosed" decision that "specifically identified expected benefits from the project outweigh the policy of reducing or avoiding significant environmental impacts of the project." 14 Cal. Code Regs. §15043(b). As with all findings, the agency must present an explanation to supply the logical steps between the ultimate finding and the facts in the record. Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 515.

In the case of Communities for a Better Environment v. Cal. Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 122-125, disapproved on other grounds by Berkeley Hillside Pres. v. City of Berkeley, 60 Cal.4th 1086 (2015), the court of appeal held that when a "first tier" EIR admits a significant, unavoidable environmental impact and included a statement of overriding considerations pursuant to Pub. Res. Code A§ 21081, then the agency must consider and make subsequent statements of overriding considerations for future projects falling within the area of impacts considered. 103 Cal.App.4th at 124-25.

At the time of CBE's challenge, Section 15152(f) also included subsection (3)(C) which allowed for a third finding in support of a statement of overriding consideration:
(C) they cannot be mitigated to avoid or substantially lessen the significant impacts despite the project proponent's willingness to accept all feasible mitigation measures, and the only purpose of including analysis of such effects in another [EIR] would be to put the agency in a position to adopt a statement of overriding considerations with respect to the effects. 463
ATTACHMENT 4
CBE v. CRA, 103 Cal.App.4th at 126. The Court held this subsection be invalid because it would have allowed agencies to avoid adopting subsequent statements of overriding consideration for future projects covered by the program level EIR. As the Court explained:

Under Guidelines section 15152(f)(3)(C), however, an agency apparently could adopt one statement of overriding considerations for a prior, more general EIR, and then avoid future political accountability by approving later, more specific projects with significant unavoidable impacts pursuant to the prior EIR and statement of overriding considerations. Even though a prior EIR's analysis of environmental effects may be subject to being incorporated in a later EIR for a later, more specific project, the responsible public officials must still go on the record and explain specifically why they are approving the later project despite its significant unavoidable impacts. 103 Cal.App.4th at 124-25. Thus, the City must consider and, if possible, make the findings to support a statement of overriding considerations for the Project. Currently, the City has not shown that it has considered and required all feasible mitigation measures to address the Project's conversion of farmland. In addition, the City has made no attempt to make any of the findings of overriding considerations for the Project's farmland conversion consistent with Pub. Res. Code § 21081. Absent those findings, the City cannot approve the Project.

0.9 Expert biologist Shawn Smallwood, Ph.D., has reviewed the MND's discussion Comment noted. Site specific biological resources will of biological resources. See Smallwood Comments, attached hereto as Exhibit be evaluated at the time a specific development A. Drawing on his familiarity with the project area and decades of studying project is proposed. At this time, the "Project" consists and surveying many of the species encountered at the site, Dr. Smallwood has of annexation only and does not include any new prepared a critique of the MND, pointing out numerous shortcomings in the development or construction. baseline assessment of the presence of species at the site, failures to evaluate impacts that will result from the Project, and numerous instances where the MND's assertions are insufficient or not supported by substantial evidence.

0.10 Dr. Smallwood points out the absence of any biological surveys that could Comment noted. Site specific biological resources will provide actual evidence of the presence or absence of species at the Project be evaluated at the time a specific development site. Based on his expert opinion and his observations at the Project site, there project is proposed. At this time, the "Project" 14 464
15 ATTACHMENT 4
has been no effort to detect whether or not numerous sensitive species are I consists of annexation only and does not include any in harm's way from the Project. Dr. Smallwood identifies 52 special status new development or construction. vertebrate species of wildlife likely to be adversely affected by the project, while the MND claims there are no special status species occurring at the site.

Smallwood Comments, p. 6. Dr. Smallwood notes the presence of ground squirrels within 150 m of the Project boundary. The presence of ground squirrel burrows is closely associated with the presence of burrowing owls that frequently use the squirrel burrows. Id., p. 8. The MND fails to discuss the possible presence of burrowing owls at the Project site.

Establishing an accurate baseline is the sine qua non to adequately analyzing and mitigating the significant environmental impacts of the Project. (See CEQA Guidelines, § 15125(a); Save Our Peninsula, 87 Cal.AppAth at 121-123.) Unfortunately, the MND's failure to investigate and identify the occurrences of sensitive biological resources at the Project site results in a skewed baseline. Such a skewed baseline ultimately "mislead(s) the public" by engendering inaccurate analyses of environmental impacts, mitigation measures and cumulative impacts for biological resources. See San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center, 149 Cal.App.4th at 656; Woodward Park Homeowners, 150 Cal.AppAth at 708-711. By failing to conduct any surveys and disregarding the absence of key species from the project site, ignoring numerous other species likely to be present, the MND fails to establish and otherwise skews the entire biological resources baseline for the Project. As a result, there is a fair argument that the Project may have significant impacts on wildlife.

The MND's reliance on the General Plan EIR also is misplaced. As Dr.

Smallwood points out, the fact that land is being used for agriculture does not mean it is not significant habitat for a long list of sensitive species. Smallwood Comments, pp. 1-7. Thus, the MND's reference to Figure 3.8-1 ofthe General Plan EIR does not provide any evidence that sensitive species are absent from the Project site.

In addition, the General Plan EIR concludes that development within the sphere of influence will have significant and unavoidable impacts on sensitive 465
ATTACHMENT 4
species. As a result, and because Dr. Smallwood has observed many sensitive species in and around the Project site, the General Plan EIR certainly does not support the complete absence of impacts on sensitive species by the Project.

See General Plan EIR, p. E-25.

D.ll The MND fails to answer the complete question posed by the CEQA Appendix Comment noted. Site specific biological resources will G Environmental Checklist Form. As the MND acknowledges, the initial study be evaluated at the time a specific development question is will the project "d) Interfere substantially with the movement of project is proposed. At this time, the "Project" consists any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established of annexation only and does not include any new native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native development or construction. wildlife nursery sites?" MND, p. 27. However, the MND's response to this question focuses exclusively on impacts to wildlife corridors. Id., pp. 27-28.

The MND ignores impacts on movement of species. Id.

As Dr. Smallwood points out, this is significant omission in the ND's analysis.

Dr. Smallwood notes that the Project may have significant impacts on wildlife movement without also affecting a discrete corridor. Smallwood Comments, pp. 8-9. Dr. Smallwood also notes that the likely development would have effects on wildlife movement off-site due to collisions between wildlife and vehicles, including trucks, using the likely development. Id., p. 8. The General Plan EIR acknowledges the impacts on wildlife movement that will result from increased traffic. General Plan EIR, p. 170. That acknowledgement in the General Plan EIR is one of the reasons the EIR concludes that the General Plan's development would have a significant and unavoidable impact on wildlife movement. Id., p. E-26. The MND mentions this component of that unavoidable impact but suggests that it is all affiliated with the SR-152 Bypass.

MND, p. 27 (lilt is also noted that new development would cause an increase in both vehicular traffic levels and nighttime light levels, which would serve to deter wildlife movement. However, the Proposed Project is not located within the Highway 152 bypass area."). The General Plan EIR suggests no such limitation and does not support any contention that the Project's impacts on wildlife cannot be significant. Dr. Smallwood's expert opinion is substantial evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, a fair argument is present that the project may have significant impacts on wildlife movement. 16 466
ATTACHMENT 4
D.12 I Dr. Smallwood describes the significant role increased traffic plays in wildlife Comment noted. Site specific biological resources will mortality. Smallwood Comments, pp. 9-10. Despite this scientific evidence of be evaluated at the time a specific development wildlife impacts from traffic, no attempt is made by the MND to identify or project is proposed. At this time, the "Project" consists evaluate this impact from the Project's increased traffic. Pointing out of annexation only and does not include any new numerous studies and his own experience in evaluating the rate of traffic development or construction. collisions with wildlife, Dr. Smallwood points out that "[t]he prezone annexation would likely lead to a project which will generate traffic; ... The project-generated traffic would kill many animals and would interfere with movement of wildlife in the region." Smallwood Comments, p.9. Dr.

Smallwood's expert analysis, combined with the MND's failure to collect information or to disclose the likely development at the site, is substantial evidence of a fair argument that the Project may have significant wildlife impacts associated with vehicle collisions.

D.13 I The MND does not discuss the potential impact of using pesticides inside and Comment noted. A site-specific analysis will be 17 outside of the proposed warehouse. Whatever the likely development is at evaluated at the time a specific development project is the site, there will likely be steps taken to abate pests. There are many proposed. At this time, the "Project" consists of businesses that provide services for controlling stored products pests, annexation only and does not include any new perching birds, and rodents and other mammal pests within and around the development or construction. uses anticipated in the City's industrial zone. Smallwood Comments, pp. lOll. These businesses advertise exclusion strategies and fumigation for stored products pests, glue boards for rodents, and other measures including anticoagulant poisons and acute toxicants. Id., p. 10. The use of these methods "can harm non-target wildlife through direct exposure and indirect exposure via predation and scavenging." Id. "Pest control involving toxicants can result in the spread of toxicants beyond the warehouse." Id. Indeed, while visiting the Project site, Dr. Smallwood observed an example of the collateral damage caused by pesticide control measures, observing
and photographing a dead gopher snake that was ensnared on a discarded glue trap intended for use on insects. Id.

An EIR is needed to analyze the potential impacts of animal damage control associated with the proposed Project. Anticipated animal control strategies at the Project should be detailed, and impacts mitigated.
467
D.14
D.15
18 ATIACHMENT4
Recognizing that several projects may together have a considerable impact, CEQA requires an agency to consider the "cumulative impacts" of a project along with other projects in the area. Pub. Res. Code § 21083(b); 14 Cal. Code Regs. §15355(b). If a project may have
cumulative impacts, the agency must prepare an EIR, since "a project may have a significant effect on the environment if '[t]he possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable.1II CBE, 103 Cal.App.4th at 98, 114; Kings County Farm Bur., 221 Cal.App.3d at 721. It is vital that an agency assess "'the environmental damage [that] often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources .. . 111 Bakersfield Citizens For Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214.

The MND makes no effort to address the Project's cumulative impacts on wildlife. Given the General Plan EIR's finding that development in the Los Banos area is having significant and unavoidable impacts to wildlife from increased traffic, disruption of wildlife movement and impacts to sensitive species, there is a near certainty that the Project will have cumulative wildlife impacts. The MND acknowledges that "[t]he potential environmental impacts associated with the Proposed Project represent a portion of the environmental consequences of the planned growth and development permitted by the 2030 General Plan." MND, p. 71. The MND then claims that "[t]he Proposed Project may involve a minor addition to the potential environmental impacts identified in the 2030 General Plan EIR, but the Proposed Project will not result in any substantial contribution to any of the significant cumulative impacts identified in the 2030 General Plan EIR." Id.

However, given the absence of any effort in the MND to describe the likely development that will result from the Project, the General Plan EIR's acknowledgement of ongoing cumulative wildlife impacts and Dr.

Smallwood's comments, there is a fair argument that the Project may have significant cumulative impacts on wildlife.

The MND's discussion ofthe Project's air quality impacts fails to identify what level of uses it has in mind in evaluating air emissions. As noted above, because the MND fails to identify the most probable development scenario for the site, there is no way to know whether 'any conclusions about the Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including
cumulative impacts, will be evaluated at the time a
specific development project is proposed. At this time, the "Project" consists of annexation only and does not
include any new development or construction.

Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including air
quality impacts, will be evaluated at the time a specific development project is proposed. At this time, the
468
ATTACHMENT 4
Project's air quality impacts have any rational basis. Although the MND I "Project" consists of annexation only and does not mentions the thresholds of significance adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air include any new development or construction.

Pollution Control District ("SJVAPD"), the MND does not address whether or not the Project will exceed those thresholds. MND, p. 22. The MND relies almost conclusively on the presumed application of the SJVAPCD's Indirect Source Review ("ISR") process and SJVAPCD Rule 9510. The MND states that the Project will exceed the development sizing requirements triggering Rule 9510. Based solely on future compliance with Rule 9510, the MND assumes that the Project's air quality impacts for NOx and PM10 will be less than significant. Initially, the General Plan EIR determined that new development operation in Los Banos would exceed not only the significance thresholds for NOx but also ROGs. General Plan EIR, p. 186. This impact was certified as significant and unavoidable. SJVAPCD Rule 9510 does not apply to ROGs.

Although it does not attempt to quantify emissions for any likely development, the MND acknowledges that the project will emit ROGs. Rule 9510 will not mitigate any ROG emissions from the likely development.

The MND places great reliance on future project's compliance with Rule 9510.

However, the MND does not identify the probable development scenario(s) and makes no effort to provide any justification for its conclusion that compliance with Rule 9510 would assure that the Project will never exceed the significance thresholds established by the -SJVAPCD. As a result, the MND is not supported by any evidence. Moreover, the General Plan EIR concluded that build out of the General Plan would result in operational emissions exceeding the thresholds for ROGs and NOx and these air quality impacts are significant and unavoidable. General Plan EIR, pp. 186, 188. Hence, at a minimum, the Project would contribute to these cumulative impacts. The MND's conclusion that the Project could not have any operational air quality impacts is an abuse of discretion because it fails to identify the likely development and provide evidence in the form of air modeling to support the MND's conclusion that there would be no significant operational air pollution impacts.

D.16 I In regard to health risks to sensitive receptors, the General Plan EIR finds that I Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including air this impact will be significant and unavoidable. General Plan DEIR, p. E-28. See quality impacts and potential impacts to sensitive 19 469
20 ATTACHMENT 4
id., p. 185 ("Stationary sources and diesel-fueled mobile sources would also receptors, will be evaluated at the time a specific generate emissions of toxic air contaminants including diesel particulate development project is proposed. At this time, the matter that could pose a health risk"). Again, defying logic, the MND "Project" consists of annexation only and does not nevertheless concludes that developing 28.5 acres of farmland to industrial include any new development or construction. uses immediately adjacent to residents could not have any potential significant effect on risks to those residents' health. MND, pp. 25-26. This conclusion is made without identifying the likely development scenarios the Project will undergo as a result of the annexation and industrial zoning. The City has not prepared any evidence to substantiate the MND's conclusions, including for example a health risk assessment. The MND's discussion of health risks makes no acknowledgement of the likelihood that diesel trucks will be part of future industrial operations at the site. No effort to estimate the levels of diesel emissions that would result from trucks using the site is attempted.

The MND also provides no evidence to support its assertion that the Project will not have any adverse effects on health risks of the adjacent neighbors from construction activities that will result. MND, pp. 24-25. This is despite the general Plan EIR's recognition that future projects would need to quantify the health risks from construction in order to address this potential impact. "Information regarding specific development projects, soil conditions, and the location of sensitive receptors in relation to the various projects would be needed in order to quantify the level of impact associated with construction activity." General Plan DEIR, pp. 185-86. "Actual significance would be determined on a project by project basis as future development applications are submitted." Id., p 186. The City is now fully aware of the location of adjacent residents and the soil conditions at the site. As discussed above, the City also has an obligation to disclose the most probable development scenario that will result from the industrial zoning. Nothing precludes the City from estimating the likely types of grading equipment and heavy construction equipment that would be need to build out the site for the anticipated industrial uses. In order to comply with CEQA and the directives set forth in the General Plan EIR, the City must make a reasonable effort to quantify and 470
21 ATIACHMENT4
disclose the health risks that may result to nearby residents from construction activities.

In addition, the MND's discussion of potential construction health risks is deficient because the City's Implementing Action POSR-I-38 does not even address diesel emissions. MND, p. 25. Whatever benefits Implementing Action POSR-I-38 may have on reducing dust from the City's construction sites, they will not reduce any diesel particulate matter from presumably wellmaintained heavy duty construction equipment and vehicles.

The MND also is entirely deficient by failing to provide any meaningful health risk quantification for the long-term operational phase of industrial activities that will be authorized by the annexation and change in the current zoning of the site. Moreover, the MND's one
sentence discussion of operational health risks focuses exclusively on stationary sources and completely ignores the most likely source of health risks from operations - diesel emissions from trucks. MND, p. 24.

The MND loosely references adhering to the Air District's rules and a general claim to comply with CEQA. Id. The General Plan EIR acknowledges that industrial operations will have significant and unavoidable health risks to the City's residents. General Plan DEIR, p. 186. Despite the absence of specific development proposals, the DEIR manages to rely upon air quality modeling to quantify the significance of emissions and resulting health risks.

Importantly, the DEIR acknowledges that precisely because the specific identity of future development proposals was not known at the time, the DEIR had to conclude that those impacts were significant and unavoidable. Id. The same rationale must apply here. Although obliged to identify probable development at the site, by not identifying any development, the City is required to acknowledge that health risks may be significant, and the Project is conditioned on all of the findings and mitigations necessary for the City to provide a statement of overriding considerations. See supra, pp. 7-9. 471
ATTACHMENT 4
For these reasons, the MND's discussion of health risks is entirely inadequate as a matter of law and an abuse of discretion.

D.17 I Like the above examples, the MND's GHG emissions discussion is largely Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including air uninformative because the City fails to disclose the most probable quality impacts and potential impacts to greenhouse development scenario at the site. In addition, the MND's GHG discussion gas emissions, will be evaluated at the time a specific ignores the most likely GHG emission sources for future industrial operations development project is proposed. At this time, the at the site - diesel truck emissions. If, for example, the site's likely "Project" consists of annexation only and does not development is to construct and operate a distribution center or warehouse, include any new development or construction. diesel truck emissions likely would be the most significant GHG emission source. See, e.g. General Plan DEIR, p. 120 ("Consumption of fossil fuels in the transportation sector was the single largest source of California's GHG emissions in 2004, accounting for 40.7 percent of total GHG emissions in the state (California Energy Commission 2006)"); id., p. 121 (describing truck emissions).

Nevertheless, the MND focuses exclusively on elements of future building design and efforts to provide alternatives such as bikes for employees.

Although important, these measures will do nothing to address the likely GHG emissions from trucks. As a result, the MND is
inadequate as matter of law in discussing the Project's GHG emission impacts.

D.18 I The MND fails to adequately address potential noise impacts of the likely Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including development scenarios on the site. The residential properties and homes on potential noise impacts, will be evaluated at the time a Honeybell Street are literally feet from the site. MND, p. 6. Any grading and specific development project is proposed. At this time, construction equipment in this area will generate excessive noise levels that the "Project" consists of annexation only and does not will have significant impacts on those properties and residences. Likewise, include any new development or construction. operational noises may also be significant, including for example truck traffic and building equipment. The General Plan measures cannot ensure that noise impacts will not result. See General Plan DEIR, p. E-31. Because the details of future development at the site are unknown, the MND cannot guarantee that noise levels will not be significant. Because the City has not endeavored to disclose the likely noise levels from construction or operations of probable development to occur at the site, the MND cannot and does not disclose the extent the Project may exceed the "normally acceptable" noise levels discussed in the general Plan EIR. See id., p. 225. There is nothing preventing 22 472
23 ATTACHMENT 4
the City from quantifying potential noise levels and evaluating and addressing appropriate mitigation measures, including buffers, walls, building alignment and others, that would apply to this site to mitigate construction and operational noise impacts. Because probable development scenarios resulting from the City's proposed industrial zoning must be disclosed by the City (see supra), it is incorrect for the MND to claim that the "[t]he Proposed Project itself will not result in any noise impacts, either temporary or permanent, as no new development or construction is proposed at this time./I MND, p. 52. In order to correct these deficiencies, the MND must evaluate noise impacts resulting from the site's likely development scenario(s) and identify mitigation measures at this stage that would at least partially address those noise impacts and provide a basis for determining whether or not the Project may have significant noise impacts. Because the MND is deficient as a matter of law and provides no evidence to support the conclusion that no significant noise impacts will result, it does not comply with CEOA's standards. 473
ATTACHMENT 4
D.19 I The MND errs as a matter of law by framing its traffic analysis as limited to Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including air the annexation procedure rather than the likely industrial development quality impacts and potential impacts to greenhouse intended to be facilitated by the annexation and pre-zoning. Thus, the MND gas emissions, will be evaluated at the time a specific misleads the public and decision makers by asserting near the beginning of its development project is proposed. At this time, the traffic impact discussion that "[t]he Proposed Project does not result in any "Project" consists of annexation only and does not additional traffic impacts, as the Proposed Project consists of annexation and include any new development or construction. prezone only." MND, p. 61. Although L1UNA agrees that a specific development proposal's traffic will need to be evaluated in further detail once a specific project is proposed, the City cannot avoid identifying a likely development scenario at this annexation and pre-zoning stage in order to disclose potential traffic impacts for the Project. As is the case for the many potential environmental impacts described above, there is nothing preventing the City from addressing traffic impacts of potential development scenarios for the site. ITE provides readily available truck trip generation rates for all of the various types of industrial operations, including warehousing and distribution. See https:llwww.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/tripandparking- generation/trip-generation-10th-edition-formats/' Given that the City is unclear what type of industrial project(s) may be proposed in the future, the MND must identify a reasonably likely development scenario from which to assess the Project's traffic impacts. As currently written, the MND relies exclusively on deferred mitigation which is forbidden pursuant to CEQA. 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15126A(a)(1)(B); Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.AppJd 296,308-309. An agency may only defer the formulation of mitigation measures when it possesses "'meaningful information' reason ably justifying an expectation of compliance." Sundstrom at 308. Because the MND provides no meaningful information, the traffic analysis and reference to future traffic analyses is contrary to law and an abuse of discretion. 24 474
ATIACHMENT4
Comment Letter No. E - Mr. Michael R. Lozeau, Lozeau Drury, LLP E.l
E.2
25 SWAPE's concerns include but are not limited to the following:

1. The City's reliance on Rule 9510 to address the Project's air pollution emissions does not address emissions of CO, RaGs, sax, and PM2.5.

2. SWAPE ran the CalEEMod air pollution emission model based on a probable project consisting of "General Light Industry" extending over most ofthe site. SWAPE estimates that the NOx remissions from the Project's operation would be 34.37 tons per year, well in excess of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's (SJVPCD") threshold of significance for NOx.

3. SWAPE ran a screening-level analysis of the health risks posed by the Project's construction and operation. Using the AERSCREEN model, SWAPE calculated at a screening level the excess cancer risk that may be posed by the construction and operation of probable industrial development associated with Project. SWAPE's screening shows that the Project may increase cancer risks to adjacent residents, including child, adult, and residential cancer risks of 73,27 and 110 in a million.

4. These all exceed SJVAPD's significance threshold of 20 in a million.

SWAPE reviewed the possible impacts of the Project on greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions and the absence of sufficient evidence to corroborate the MND's discussion of this potential impact.

Traffic Engineer Smith projects the traffic impacts of General Light Industrial uses at the site based on the authoritative transportation resource Trip Generation, 10'" Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Using the reasonable projection that probable development would result in about 30 percent site coverage with roughly 372,438 TSF floor area, the probable development of the site would generate 1,856 new trips daily, 261 in the AM peak and 309 in the PM peak. All of these trips would be new trips. All of these trips would add significantly to the vehicle miles traveled from this area of Los Banos. The level of vehicle trips estimated by Mr. Smith is substantial evidence that the Project may have significant impacts on traffic, traffic safety, and VMTs.

Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including air
quality impacts and potential impacts to greenhouse
gas emissions, will be evaluated at the time a specific development project is proposed. At this time, the
"Project" consists of annexation only and does not
include any new development or construction.

Comment noted. A site-specific analysis, including
traffic impacts, will be evaluated at the time a specific development project is proposed. At this time, the
"Project" consists of annexation only and does not
include any new development or construction.
475
Legend
LosBanos_GPLU
GPLU
D Agriculture/Rural
_ Civic/Institutional
III Commercial
D Employment Park
D High Density Residential
D Industrial
o Low Density Residential
o Medium Density Residential
_ Mixed Use
D Neighborhood Commercial
I 1 Park
D Professional Office
_ SR 152 Bypass Corridor
~ I
!
!
I
i
; ........... 6 •••••• ;
'W
t~ Z
W
IIf1 i
Yo
:'0
t«
:0:: IliiAUClfOI\l
al .$'..>-
en ~o
1 ~
~
Ien
o
o
«
:r:

DR U «
:2
General Plan Land Use Map
AMG & Associates Annexation
'--------'-~- WEST-SANTA
OVERLAND_AVE
i
i
i
= !
i
i
. i
i
• i
=
BARBARA-STl

MERIDIAN
I- CT
en
o
-I
-I
~ STERLING STI

GALLO CT
()OJ
~ DANCY....::;' i
,ST
~\
L.I
:....I'
W
al'
>-:
en
'""'
W
.z
'0'
::r: lII-en'
1-1
0 '
a:'~".iI' ..• u.I •• I.'''''ii''''l .• n.ii.ii.''. ib.ii.d4 Z en =:J'
Z:
1-' I II-' enl---L-)en'
o
en
Z
:r:
o
...., .
'~
W
'0 0::,
0:: W
,I-r-I~ n:~' lUI 'Z d I=:J w' ,en 'al' ,>-1
,W,
:Z'
~ ________ "' 2
WfLlMC:: O-=T-T-A-v.Je
"W
':2
" '0
Ien
(!)
c:~;]1~T I , I-.
'0::'
CHARDONNAY;~)
~~T~
TANGEJ0 ' J
'AVE r-... '---- W ,>
1«
,g
W ,:2
:a:
~r--MANDARIN AVE' /'
~l ) - ~
CITRUUVi c: 1~ __ O_R_A_NG-.Jj r::; CLfME_Ay~
476

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
477
LOS Banos
At the Crosst-oads of CalifoJofda

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Date: December 24, 2021
Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing
Proposal: Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2014091056) for the AMG Industrial Annexation and Prezone #2013-01, and Pre-Annexation Development Agreement - AMG & Associates
A Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos City Council to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2014091056) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the AMG Industrial Annexation and Pre-Zone 2013-01, and associated Pre-Annexation Development Agreement. The proposed Project is located on the southeast corner of Overland Avenue and Johnson Road, adjacent to the northwestern boundary of the City of Los Banos in Merced County. The

28.5-acre Project Site is bound by Overland Avenue to the north, Johnson Road to the west, and industrial uses to the south; more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 081-110-007.

The Los Banos Planning Commission held a public hearing on Wednesday, December 8, 2021, for the purpose of considering the above mentioned project. At the completion of the public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the above mentioned project to the Los Banos City Council.

A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Los Banos City Council on Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. virtually via Zoom.

Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Stacy Souza Elms, Community and Economic Development Director, via email at [email protected] or by phone at (209) 827-2433. Public comment during the public hearing will be taken in real time during the meeting. Emails regarding the public hearing may also be sent to the City Clerk at [email protected] and will be read into the record during the public hearing.

All persons are invited to be present at the public hearing. Written and oral testimony is invited. Notice is hereby further given that if you challenge the above described Project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Additional information may be obtained from the Community & Economic Development Department at 520 J Street, Los Banos, California.- In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office ofthe City Clerk at (209) 827-7000. Notification at least 72 hours prior to the public hearing will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to allow participation at this hearing.

Tm . CITY OF OS ANOS
, th ' {
Stacy u alms
Community and Economic Developm@l Director
478

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
479
LOS Banos
Al tiff Ctnssroacls of Ctll~(Ol Ilia
Agenda Staff Report
TO: Mayor Faria & City Council Members
FROM: William Via, Public Works Operations Manager
DATE: January 5, 2022
SUBJECT: Organic Waste Disposal Reduction Ordinance
TYPE OF REPORT: Agenda Item
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council waive the first reading and introduce an Ordinance to add Chapter 3.2 to Title 6 of the Los Banos Municipal Code relating to organic waste disposal reduction.

Background: In 2016, then Governor Brown signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 1383 (Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016), establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants (SLCP) in various sectors of California's economy.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CaIRecycle) then conducted two years of informal hearings with local governments and stakeholders to assist in developing formal regulations. On November 3, 2020 the Office of Administrative Law approved the regulations that took effect on January 1, 2022.

The current contract with Mid Valley Disposal (MVD) includes bundled Solid Waste collection services, so that every customer subscribes to the three can system; gray for garbage, blue for recyclables, and green for organiC waste. This strategy has assisted the City in meeting some of the requirements of SB 1383, namely that all covered generators must subscribe to organic waste collection services.
1 480
On May 5, 2021, staff presented, through Mid Valley Disposal, an overview of SB 1383 and the City's progress to meeting the new requirements to Council. This ordinance is the next step in the process of becoming compliant with the requirements of the new law.

Discussion: SB 1383 is the State's most ambitious waste reduction law in the last 30 years and enacts the following targets to reduce organic waste in landfills:
• Achieve a 50% reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75% reduction by 2025 • Recover at least 20% of currently disposed surplus food by 2025 Short lived climate pollutants (SLCPs), including the GHG methane, adversely affect indoor and outdoor air quality. Methane emissions are more potent than carbon dioxide but live a short time in the atmosphere. The decomposition of organic waste in landfills is a significant source of methane emissions and, since landfills are the third largest producer of methane, the State's SLCP strategy includes managing organic waste disposed of in landfills by disallowing the use of organic waste as daily cover and removing as much edible food waste as possible from the waste stream. Food scraps, green waste, and food soiled paper and cardboard are organic materials that account for a significant portion of California's overall waste stream. Increasing food waste prevention, encouraging edible food rescue, and expanding the composting of organic waste will reduce methane from landfill operations. In addition to setting specific emissions reduction goals, SB 1383 mandates cities and counties to:
• Provide organic waste collection services to all residents and businesses • Develop and adopt an enforcement mechanism or ordinance by January 2022 • Establish an edible food recovery program
• Update the City's procurement policy to purchase recycled content paper and recycled organic waste products (e.g., compost and mulch) at a volume of 0.08 tons/resident
• Provide outreach and education for generators, haulers, facilities, edible food recovery organizations, and municipal departments
• Plan and secure access for recycling and edible food recovery capacity • Monitor compliance and conduct enforcement
• Maintain accurate compliance records
To meet the SB 1383 regulations, jurisdictions throughout the State are required to adopt an ordinance or other similarly enforceable mechanism by March 1, 2022. The ordinance will mandate that organic waste generators, haulers, and other entities subject to the requirements of SB 1383 regulations and subject to the jurisdiction's authority, comply with SB 1383 regulatory requirements. It will also help reduce food insecurity by requiring Commercial Edible Food Generators to arrange to have the maximum amount of their edible food, that would otherwise be disposed, be recovered for human consumption. 2 481
Staff is currently working with the MVD in identifying edible food generators and establishing recovery methods to meet the edible food recovery aspects of SB 1383.

Currently, all commercial customers generating two-cubic yards or more of commercial solid waste per week, and multi-family dwellings of five units or more are required to recycle their organic waste under mandatory commercial organics recycling requirements of AB 1826. Multi-family dwellings were not required to arrange for the food waste portion of mandatory commercial organics recycling. They must now do so under SB 1383, and the legislation adds on to AB 1826 by associating SLCP reductions with organic waste disposal, and granting CalRecycie the regulatory authority required to achieve the organic waste disposal reduction targets. Our current contract with MVD includes a bundled service, mentioned above, and also includes the diversion of all organic waste from the landfill and to MVD's certified organic composting facility. This diversion of organic waste will go far in helping the City meet our diversion goals and will generate beneficial organic compost for use in agriculture and landscaping.

This ordinance addresses the SB 1383 regulatory requirements the City needs to enforce on other entities, including requirements for generators to participate in organic waste collection programs; multi-family and business owners and property managers to support organic waste disposal reduction; commercial edible food generators to recover edible food through contracts or written agreements with food recovery organizations and services.

Fiscal Impact:

At this time there is no financial impact to the City. The City will continue to receive revenue collected from the service rates as is current practice.

Josh Pin
./
Attachments:

Proposed Ordinance
3 482

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
483
Ordinance No. __ _

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS ADDING CHAPTER 3.2 (ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION)
TO TITLE 6 (SANITATION AND HEALTH) OF THE LOS BANOS

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, State recycling law, Assembly Bill 939 of 1989, the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (California Public Resources Code Section 40000, et seq., as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time), requires cities and counties to reduce, reuse, and recycle (including composting) Solid Waste generated in their Jurisdictions to the maximum extent feasible before any incineration or landfill disposal of waste, to conserve water, energy, and other natural resources, and to protect the environment.

WHEREAS, State recycling law, Assembly Bill 341 of 2011 (approved by the Governor of the State of California on October 5, 2011, which amended Sections 41730, 41731, 41734, 41735, 41736, 41800, 42926, 44004, and 50001 of, and added Sections 40004, 41734.5, and 41780.01 and Chapter 12.8 (commencing with Section 42649) to Part 3 of Division 30 of, and added and repealed Section 41780.02 of, the Public Resources Code, as amended, supplemented, superseded and replaced from time to time), places requirements on businesses and Multi-Family property owners that generate a specified threshold amount of Solid Waste to arrange for recycling services and requires Jurisdictions to implement a Mandatory Commercial Recycling program.

WHEREAS, State organics recycling law, Assembly Bill 1826 of 2014 (approved by the Governor of the State of California on September 28, 2014, which added Chapter

12.9 (commencing with Section 42649.8) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, relating to Solid Waste, as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time), requires businesses and Multi-Family property owners that generate a specified threshold amount of Solid Waste, Recycling, and Organic Waste per week to arrange for recycling services for that waste, requires Jurisdictions to implement a recycling program to divert Organic Waste from businesses subject to the law, and requires Jurisdictions to to implement a Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling program.

WHEREAS, SB 1383, the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act of 2016, requires CalRecycie to develop regulations to reduce organics in landfills as a source of methane. The regulations place requirements on multiple entities including Jurisdictions, residential households, Commercial Businesses and business owners, Commercial Edible Food Generators, haulers, Self-Haulers, Food Recovery Organizations, and Food Recovery Services to support achievement of Statewide Organic Waste disposal reduction targets.

WHEREAS, SB 1383, the Short-lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Act of 2016, requires Jurisdictions to adopt and enforce an ordinance or enforceable mechanism to 484
implement relevant provisions of SB 1383 Regulations. This ordinance will also help reduce food insecurity by requiring Commercial Edible Food Generators to arrange to have the maximum amount of their Edible Food, that would otherwise be disposed, to be recovered for human consumption.

WHEREAS, AB 827, requires businesses that provide customers access to the business to provide customers with a recycling bin or container that is visible, easily accessible, adjacent to each bin or container for trash, except in restrooms, and clearly marked with educational signage. Full service restaurants are exempt.

WHEREAS, Requirements in this ordinance are consistent with other adopted goals and policies of the City of Los Banos including: Title 6-3.1.03 Curbside Recycling Program or diversion goals associated with AB 939
WHEREAS, the subject Ordinance is not subject to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3) and 15061 (b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Title 6 (Sanitation and Health) of the Los Banos Municipal Code is hereby amended to add Chapter 3.2 (Organic Waste Disposal Reduction) to read as follows:

TITLE 6 SANITATION AND HEALTH
CHAPTER 3.2 ORGANIC WASTE DISPOSAL REDUCTION
Sec. 6-3.2.01 Definitions
For the purposes of this chapter, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this chapter are defined as follows:
(a) "Blue Container" means a container where either: (1) the lid of the container is blue in color or (2) the body of the container is blue in color and the lid is either blue, gray, or black in color and shall be used for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Recyclable Materials
485
(b) "Commercial Business" or "Commercial" means a firm, partnership, proprietorship, joint-stock company, corporation, or association, whether for-profit or nonprofit, strip mall, industrial facility, or a multifamily residential dwelling. (c) "Commercial Edible Food Generator" means a commercial edible food generator that is one of the following:
(1) Tier One.
(A) Supermarket.
(B) Grocery store with a total facility size equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet.
(C) Food service provider.
(D) Food distributor.
(E) Wholesale food vendor.
(2) Tier Two.
(A) Restaurant with 250 or more seats, or a total facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet.
(B) Hotel with an on-site food facility and 200 or more rooms. (C) Health facility with an on-site food facility and 100 or more beds. (D) Large venue is a large event that charges an admission price or is operated by a local Agency.
(E) Large event is a permanent venue facility that annually seats or serves an average of more than 2,000 individuals within the grounds of the facility per day of operation of the venue facility.
(F) A state agency with a cafeteria with 250 or more seats or a total cafeteria facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. (G) A local education agency with an on-site food facility. (d) "Compliance Review" means a review of records by the City of Los Banos, or designee, to determine compliance with this ordinance. 486
(e) "Compost" means the product resulting from the controlled biological decomposition of organic Solid Wastes that are Source Separated from the municipal Solid Waste stream, or which are separated at a centralized facility. (f) "Container Contamination" or "Contaminated Container" means a container, regardless of color, that contains Prohibited Container Contaminants. (g) "C&D" means construction and demolition debris.
(h) "Designee" means an entity that a City contracts with or otherwise arranges to carry out any of the City's responsibilities of this ordinance. A Designee may be a government entity, a hauler, a private entity, or a combination of those entities. (i) "Edible Food" means food intended for human consumption. For the purposes of this ordinance Edible Food is not Solid Waste if it is recovered and not discarded. Nothing in this ordinance requires or authorizes the Recovery of Edible Food that does not meet the food safety requirements of the California Retail Food Code.

U) "Enforcement Action" means an action of the City to address noncompliance with this ordinance including, but not limited to, issuing administrative citations, fines, penalties, or using other remedies.
(k) "Enforcement Official" means the city manager, or his/her authorized Designee(s) who is/are partially or wholly responsible for enforcing the ordinance. (I) "Food Distributor" means a company that distributes food to entities including, but not limited to, Supermarkets and Grocery Stores. (m) "Food Facility" means an operation that stores, prepares, packages, serves, vends, or otherwise provides food for human consumption at the retail level (Refer to Section 113789 of the Health and Safety Code for a complete definition). (n) "Food Recovery" means actions to collect and distribute food for human consumption that otherwise would be disposed.
(0) "Food Recovery Organization" means an entity that engages in the collection or receipt of Edible Food from Commercial Edible Food Generators and distributes that Edible Food to the public for Food Recovery either directly or through other entities including, but not limited to:
(1) A food bank as defined in Section 113783 of the Health and Safety Code; (2) A nonprofit charitable organization as defined in Section 113841 of the Health and Safety code; and,
487
(3) A nonprofit charitable temporary food facility as defined in Section 113842 of the Health and Safety Code.
(p) "Food Recovery Service" means a person or entity that collects and transports Edible Food from a Commercial Edible Food Generator to a Food Recovery Organization or other entities for Food Recovery.
(q) "Food Scraps" means all food such as, but not limited to, fruits, vegetables, meat, poultry, seafood, shellfish, rice, beans, pasta, bread, cheese, and eggshells. Food Scraps excludes fats, oils, and grease when such materials are Source Separated from other Food Scraps.
(r) "Food Service Provider" means an entity primarily engaged in providing food services to institutional, governmental, Commercial, or industrial locations of others based on contractual arrangements with these types of organizations. (s) "Food-Soiled Paper" is compostable paper material that has come in contact with food or liquid, such as, but not limited to, compostable paper plates, paper coffee cups, napkins, pizza boxes, and milk cartons.
(t) "Food Waste" means Food Scraps, and Food-Soiled Paper. (u) "Gray Container means container used only for the purpose of storage and collection of garbage.
(v) Green Container" means a container used only for the purpose of storage and collection of Source Separated Organic Waste including food waste. (w) "Grocery Store" means a store primarily engaged in the retail sale of canned food; dry goods; fresh fruits and vegetables; fresh meats, fish, and poultry; and any area that is not separately owned within the store where the food is prepared and served, including a bakery, deli, and meat and seafood departments. (x) "Hauler Route" means the designated itinerary or sequence of stops for each segment of the City's collection service area.
(y) "Inspection" means a site visit where a City or City designee reviews records, containers, and an entity's collection, handling, recycling, or landfill disposal of Organic Waste or Edible Food handling to determine if the entity is complying with requirements set forth in this ordinance).
(z) "Multi-Family Residential Dwelling" means residential premises with five (5) or more dwelling units.
(aa) "Non-Compostable Paper" includes but is not limited to paper that is coated in a plastic material that will not breakdown in the composting process. 488
(bb) "Non-Organic Recyclables" means non-putrescible and non-hazardous recyclable wastes including but not limited to bottles, cans, metals, plastics and glass. (cc) "Notice of Violation (NOV)" means a notice that a violation has occurred that includes a compliance date to avoid an action to seek penalties. (dd) "Organic Waste" means Solid Wastes containing material originated from living organisms and their metabolic waste products, including but not limited to food, green material, landscape and pruning waste, lumber, wood, Paper Products, Printing and Writing Paper, and manure
(ee) "Organic Waste Generator" means a person or entity that is responsible for the initial creation of Organic Waste.
(ff) "Prohibited Container Contaminants" means discarded materials that are not acceptable Recyclable Materials to be placed in the blue container; discarded materials that are not acceptable Source Separated Organic waste to be placed the green container; and discarded materials that are not acceptable to be placed in the Gray Container and Excluded Waste placed in any container.
(gg) "Recovered Organic Waste Products" means products made from California, landfill-diverted recovered Organic Waste processed in a permitted or otherwise authorized facility.
(hh) "Recovery" means any activity or process of diverting organic waste from the landfill, processed at an approved "Recycling Center", Composting Facility, In-Vessel Digestion Operation or Facility, Biomass Conversion Operation or Facility, or used as soil amendment for erosion control, revegetation, slope stabilization, or landscaping. (ii) "Recycled-Content Paper" means Paper Products and Printing and Writing Paper that consists of at least 30 percent, by fiber weight, postconsumer fiber.

Uj) "Route Review" means a visual Inspection of containers along a Hauler Route for the purpose of determining Container Contamination and may include mechanical Inspection methods such as the use of cameras. (kk) "SB 1383" means Senate Bill 1383 of 2016 approved by the Governor on September 19, 2016, which added Sections 39730.5, 39730.6, 39730.7, and 39730.8 to the Health and Safety Code, and added Chapter 13.1 (commencing with Section 42652) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, establishing methane emissions reduction targets in a Statewide effort to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants as amended, supplemented, superseded, and replaced from time to time. (II) "SB 1383 Regulations" or "SB 1383" Regulatory means or refers to, for the purposes of this ordinance, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Reduction 489
regulations developed by CalRecycle and adopted in 2020 that created 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12 and amended portions of regulations of 14 CCR and 27 CCR. (mm) "Self-Hauler" means a person, who hauls Solid Waste, Organic Waste or Recyclable Material he or she has generated to another person. Self-hauler also includes a person who back-hauls waste. Back-haul means generating and transporting Organic Waste to a destination owned and operated by the generator using the generator's own employees and equipment.
(nn) "Single-Family" means of, from, or pertaining to any residential premises with fewer than five (5) units.
(00) "Solid Waste" has the same meaning as defined in State Public Resources Code Section 40191, which defines Solid Waste as all putrescible and non-putrescible solid, semisolid, and liquid wastes, including garbage, trash, refuse, paper, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles and parts thereof, discarded home and industrial appliances, dewatered, treated, or chemically fixed sewage sludge which is not hazardous waste, manure, vegetable or animal solid and semi-solid wastes, and other discarded solid and semisolid wastes, with the exception that Solid Waste does not include any of the following wastes:
(1 )
40141.

Hazardous waste, as defined in the State Public Resources Code Section (2) Radioactive waste regulated pursuant to the State Radiation Control Law (Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 114960) of Part 9 of Division 104 of the State Health and Safety Code).
(3) Medical waste regulated pursuant to the State Medical Waste Management Act (Part 14 (commencing with Section 117600) of Division 104 of the State Health and Safety Code). Untreated medical waste shall not be disposed of in a Solid Waste landfill, as defined in State Public Resources Code Section 40195.1. Medical waste that has been treated and deemed to be Solid Waste shall be regulated pursuant to Division 30 of the State Public Resources Code.
(pp) "Source Separated" means materials, including commingled recyclable materials and organic waste, that have been separated or kept separate from the Solid Waste stream, at the point of generation, for the purpose of additional sorting or processing those materials for recycling or reuse in order to return them to the economic mainstream in the form of raw material for new, reused, or reconstituted products, which meet the quality standards necessary to be used in the marketplace. For the purposes of the ordinance, Source Separated shall include separation of materials by the generator, property owner, property owner's employee, property manager, or property manager's employee into different containers for the purpose of collection such that Source Separated materials are separated from Gray Container Waste or other Solid Waste for the purposes of collection and processing.
490
(qq) "Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste" means Source Separated Organic Wastes that can be placed in a Blue Container that is limited to the collection of those Organic Wastes and Non-Organic Recyclables. (rr) "Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste" means Source Separated Organic Waste that can be placed in a Green Container that is specifically intended for the separate collection of Organic Waste by the generator, excluding Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste, carpets, Non-Compostable Paper, and textiles.
(ss) "Source Separated Recyclable Materials" means Source Separated NonOrganic Recyclables and Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste. (tt) "State" means the State of California.
(uu) "Supermarket" means a full-line, self-service retail store with gross annual sales of two million dollars ($2,000,000), or more, and which sells a line of dry grocery, canned goods, or nonfood items and some perishable items. (vv) "Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator" means a Commercial Edible Food Generator that is one of the following:
(1) Supermarket.
(2) Grocery Store with a total facility size equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet.
(3) Food Service Provider.
(4) Food Distributor.
(5) Wholesale Food Vendor.
(ww) "Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator" means a Commercial Edible Food Generator that is one of the following:
(1) Restaurant with 250 or more seats, or a total facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet.
(2) Hotel with an on-site Food Facility and 200 or more rooms. (3) Health facility with an on-site Food Facility and 100 or more beds. (4) Large Venue.
491
(5) Large Event.
(6) A State agency with a cafeteria with 250 or more seats or total cafeteria facility size equal to or greater than 5,000 square feet. (7) A Local Education Agency facility with an on-site Food Facility.

Sec. 6-3.2.02 Organic Waste Generators
(a) Single Family dwellings shall subscribe to City's three-container organic waste collection services for all organic waste generated by placing garbage in the gray container, recyclables in the blue container, and organic materials such as green waste and food waste in the green container.
(b) Multi-Family Residential dwellings shall subscribe to City franchise hauler's three-bin container organic waste collection services for all organic waste generated by placing garbage in the gray container, recyclables in the blue container, and organic materials such as green waste and food waste in the green container. (1) Provide adequate number, size, and location of collection containers with sufficient labels or colors consistent with City's blue, green, and gray collection services containers for employees, contractors, and tenants.
(2) Provide education information before or within fourteen (14) days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes requirements to keep Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials separate from Gray Container Waste (when applicable) and the location of containers and the rules governing their use at each property.
(c) Commercial Businesses shall subscribe to City's three- bin container organic waste collection services for all organic waste generated by placing garbage in the gray container, recyclables in the blue container, and organic materials such as green waste and food waste in the green container.
(1) Provide adequate number, size, and location of collection containers with sufficient labels or colors consistent with City's blue, green, and gray collection services containers for employees, contractors, and tenants.
(2) Pursuant to AB 827, Commercial Businesses that generate organic waste and recyclable materials shall provide green containers for the collection of organic waste and blue containers for recyclable materials in all indoor and outdoor areas where disposal containers are provided for customers, for materials generated by the business. (3) Provide education information before or within fourteen (14) days of occupation of the premises to new tenants that describes requirements to keep Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste and Source Separated Recyclable Materials 492
separate from Gray and the location of containers and the rules governing their use at each property.

Sec. 6-3.2.03 Waivers
The City may waive a Commercial Business' or property owner's obligation (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings) to comply with some or all of the recyclable materials and/or Organic Waste requirements of this Chapter. (a) De Minimis Waivers.

Commercial Businesses requesting a de Minimis waiver shall:
(1) Submit an application specifying the services that they are requesting a waiver from and provide either of the following documentation. (A) The Commercial Business' total Solid Waste collection service is two cubic yards or more per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 20 gallons per week per applicable container of the business' total waste; or,
(B) The Commercial Business' total Solid Waste collection service is less than two cubic yards per week and Organic Waste subject to collection in a Blue Container or Green Container comprises less than 10 gallons per week per applicable container of the business' total waste.
(2) Notify City if circumstances change such that Commercial Business's Organic Waste exceeds threshold required for waiver, in which case waiver will be rescinded.
(3) Provide written verification of eligibility for de Minimis waiver every 5 years if City has approved de Minimis waiver.
(b) Physical Space Waiver.
(1) Submit an application form specifying the type(s) of collection services for which they are requesting a compliance waiver.
(2) Provide documentation that the premises lack adequate space for Blue Containers and/or Green Containers including documentation from its hauler, licensed architect, or licensed engineer.
(3) Provide written verification to City that it is still eligible for physical space waiver every five years if City has approved application for a physical space waiver. City will confer with staff, a hauler, licensed architect, or licensed engineer of the premises 493
lack of adequate space for the collection containers required for compliance with the Organic Waste collection requirements.
(c) Review and Approval of Waivers shall be conducted by the Public Works Director, or designee.

Sec. 6-3.2.04 Commercial Edible Food Generators
(a) Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply with the requirements of this Section commencing January 1, 2022, and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators must comply commencing January 1, 2024. (b) Large Venue or Large Event operators not providing food services, but allowing for food to be provided by others, shall require Food Facilities operating at the Large Venue or Large Event to comply with the requirements of this Section, commencing January 1, 2024.
(c) Commercial Edible Food Generators shall comply with the following requirements:
(1) Arrange to recover the maximum amount of Edible Food that would otherwise be disposed.
(2) Contract with or enter into a written agreement with Food Recovery Organizations or Food Recovery Services for:
(A) the collection of Edible Food for Food Recovery; or (8) acceptance of the Edible Food that the Commercial Edible Food Generator self-hauls to the Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery. (3) Shall not intentionally spoil Edible Food that is capable of being recovered by a Food Recovery Organization or a Food Recovery Service. (4) Allow City's designated entity to access the premises and reView records. (5) Keep records that include the following information:
(A) A list of each Food Recovery Service or organization that collects or receives its Edible Food pursuant to a contract or written agreement. (8) A copy of all contracts or written agreements with Food Recovery Service or organization.
(C) A record of the following information for each of those Food Recovery Services or Food Recovery Organizations:
494
(i) The name, address and contact information of the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization.
(ii) The types of food that will be collected by or self-hauled to the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization.
(iii) The established frequency that food will be collected or self-hauled. (iv) The quantity of food, measured in pounds recovered per month, collected or self-hauled to a Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization for Food Recovery.
(6) No later than September 1, 2022, submit an annual Food Recovery report to the City for the period of January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 that includes the list of Food Recovery Organizations and Services contracted to receive recovered edible food and the amount of edible food in pounds collected for each Food Recovery Organizations and Services. Submit annual Food Recovery report to the City July 1, 2023 and on or before July 1 each year thereafter for the period covering the entire previous calendar year.
(d) Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to limit or conflict with the protections provided by the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 2017, the Federal Good Samaritan Act, or share table and school food donation guidance pursuant to Senate Bill 557 of 2017 (approved by the Governor of the State of California on September 25, 2017, which added Article 13 [commencing with Section 49580] to Chapter 9 of Part 27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, and to amend Section 114079 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to food safety, as amended, supplemented, superseded and replaced from time to time).

Sec. 6-3.2.05 Food Recovery organizations and Services
(a) Food Recovery Services collecting or receiving Edible Food directly from Commercial Edible Food Generators, via a contract or written agreement shall maintain the following records otherwise:
(1) The name, address, and contact information for each Commercial Edible Food Generator from which the service collects edible food. (2) The quantity in pounds of edible food collected from each Commercial Edible Food Generator per month.
(3) The quantity in pounds of edible food transported to each Food Recovery Organization per month.
495
(4) The name, address, and contact information for each Food Recovery Organization that the Food Recovery Service transports edible food to for Food Recovery. (b) Food Recovery Organizations collecting or receiving edible food directly from Commercial Edible Food Generators, via a contract or written agreement shall maintain the following records:
(1) The name, address, and contact information for each Commercial Edible Food Generator from which the organization receives edible food. (2) The quantity in pounds of edible food received from each Commercial Edible Food Generator per month.
(3) The name, address, and contact information for each Food Recovery Service that the organization receives edible food from for food recovery. (c) Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to limit or conflict with the protections provided by the California Good Samaritan Food Donation Act of 2017, the Federal Good Samaritan Act, or share table and school food donation guidance pursuant to Senate Bill 557 of 2017 (approved by the Governor of the State of California on September 25, 2017, which added Article 13 [commencing with Section 49580] to Chapter 9 of Part 27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, and to amend Section 114079 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to food safety, as amended, supplemented, superseded and replaced from time to time). (d) Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services that have their primary address physically located in the City and contract with or have written agreements with one or more Commercial Edible Food Generators shall report to the City it is located in the following:
(1) The list of Commercial Edible Food Generators.
(2) The total pounds of edible food recovered in the previous calendar year from the Tier One and Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generators. (3) The above report is due to the City by:
(A) September 1, 2022, for the period of January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022.
(B) July 1, 2023 and on or before July 1 each year thereafter for the period covering the entire previous calendar year.
(e) Provide information and consultation to the City, upon request, regarding existing, or proposed new or expanded, Food Recovery capacity that could be accessed by the City and its Commercial Edible Food Generators. A Food Recovery Service or 496
Food Recovery Organization contacted by the City shall respond to such request for information within 60 days, unless a shorter timeframe is otherwise specified by the City.

Sec. 6-3.2.06 Haulers and Facility Operators
(a) Exclusive Franchise Hauler providing residential, commercial, or industrial Organic Waste collection services to generators within the City's boundaries shall meet the following requirements and standards as a condition of approval of a contract or agreement with the City to collect Organic Waste:
(1) Through written notice to the City annually on or before February 15 of each year, identify the facilities to which Organic Waste including facilities for Source Separated Recyclable Materials, Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, and Mixed Waste.
(2) Transport Source Separated Recyclable Materials, Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste, and Mixed Waste to a facility, operation, activity, or property that recovers Organic Waste.
(3) Exclusive Franchise Hauler authorized to collect Organic Waste shall comply with education, equipment, signage, container labeling, container color, contamination monitoring, reporting, and other requirements contained within its franchise agreement, permit, license, or other agreement entered into with the City.

Sec. 6-3.2.07 Self-Hauler Requirements
(a) Self-Haulers shall source separate all recyclable materials and Organic Waste (materials that City otherwise requires generators to separate for collection in the City's organics and recycling collection program) generated on-site from Solid Waste in a manner consistent with the three-container system (gray container for trash, blue container for recyclables, and green container for organic waste including food waste), or shall haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility specified by the City.
(b) Self-Haulers shall haul their Source Separated Recyclable Materials to a facility that recovers those materials; and haul their Source Separated Green Container Organic Waste to a Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Source Separated Organic Waste. Alternatively, Self-Haulers may haul Organic Waste to a High Diversion Organic Waste Processing Facility specified by the City. (c) Self-Haulers that are Commercial Businesses (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings) shall keep a record of the amount of Organic Waste delivered to each Solid Waste facility, operation, activity, or property that processes or recovers Organic Waste; this record shall be provided to the City, or Designee, upon request. The records shall include the following information:
497
(1) Delivery receipts and weight tickets from the entity accepting the waste. (2) The amount of material in cubic yards or tons transported by the generator to each entity.
(3) If the material is transported to an entity that does not have scales on-site or employs scales incapable of weighing the Self-Hauler's vehicle in a manner that allows it to determine the weight of materials received, the Self-Hauler is not required to record the weight of material but shall keep a record of the entities that received the Organic Waste.

Sec. 6-3.2.08 Inspections and Investigations by City
(a) City representatives and/or its designated entity, including Designees are authorized to conduct Inspections and investigations, at random or otherwise, of any collection container, collection vehicle loads, or transfer, processing, or disposal facility for materials collected from generators, or Source Separated materials to confirm compliance with this ordinance by Organic Waste Generators, Commercial Businesses (including Multi-Family Residential Dwellings), property owners, Commercial Edible Food Generators, haulers, Self-Haulers, Food Recovery Services, and Food Recovery Organizations, subject to applicable laws.
(b) Regulated entity shall provide or arrange for access during all Inspections (with the exception of residential property interiors) and shall cooperate with the City's employee or its designated entity/Designee during such Inspections and investigations.

Such Inspections and investigations may include confirmation of proper placement of materials in containers, Edible Food Recovery activities, records, or any other requirement of this ordinance described herein. Failure to provide or arrange for:
(1) access to an entity's premises; or
(2) access to records for any Inspection or investigation is a violation of this ordinance and may result in penalties described.
(c) Any records obtained by a City during its Inspections, and other reviews shall be subject to the requirements and applicable disclosure exemptions of the Public Records Act as set forth in Government Code Section 6250 et seq. (d) City representatives, its designated entity, and/or Designee are authorized to conduct any Inspections, Remote Monitoring, or other investigations as reasonably necessary to further the goals of this ordinance, subject to applicable laws. (e) City shall receive written complaints from persons regarding an entity that may be potentially non-compliant with SB 1383 Regulations, including receipt of anonymous complaints.
498
Sec. 6-3.2.09 Enforcement
(a) Violation of any provIsion of this Chapter shall constitute grounds for issuance of a Notice of Violation and assessment of a fine by a City of Los Banos Enforcement Official or representative. Enforcement Actions under this Chapter are issuance of an administrative citation and assessment of a fine. The City of Los Banos' procedures on imposition of administrative fines (Title 4, Chapter 11) are hereby incorporated in their entirety, as modified from time to time, and shall govern the imposition, enforcement, collection, and review of administrative citations issued to enforce this Chapter and any rule or regulation adopted pursuant to this chapter, except as otherwise indicated in this Chapter.
(b) Other remedies allowed by law may be used, including civil action or prosecution as misdemeanor or infraction. The City may pursue civil actions in the California courts to seek recovery of unpaid administrative citations. The City may choose to delay court action until such time as a sufficiently large number of violations, or cumulative size of violations exist such that court action is a reasonable use of City staff and resources.
(c) Responsible Entity for Enforcement
(1) Enforcement pursuant to this ordinance may be undertaken by the City Enforcement Official, which may be the city manager or his/her designated entity, legal counsel, or combination thereof.
(2) Enforcement may also be undertaken by a Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official, designated by the City, in consultation with the City Enforcement Official.
(A) The City Enforcement Official(s) (and Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official, if used) will interpret this Chapter; determine the applicability of waivers, if violation(s) have occurred; implement Enforcement Actions; and, determine if compliance standards are met.
(8) The City Enforcement Official(s) (and Regional or County Agency Enforcement Official, if used) may issue Notices of Violation(s). (d) Process for Enforcement
(1) The City Enforcement Officials or Regional or County Enforcement Officials and/or their Designee will monitor compliance with this Chapter randomly and through Compliance Reviews, Route Reviews, investigation of complaints, and an Inspection program (that may include Remote Monitoring). Sec. 6-3.2.08 establishes the City's right to conduct Inspections and investigations.
499
(2) The City may issue an official notification to notify regulated entities of its obligations under the ordinance.
(3) For incidences of Prohibited Container Contaminants found in containers, the City will issue a Notice of Violation to any generator found to have Prohibited Container Contaminants in a container. Such notice will be provided via a cart tag or other communication immediately upon identification of the Prohibited Container Contaminants or within five (5) days after determining that a violation has occurred. If the City observes Prohibited Container Contaminants in a generator's containers on more than three (3) consecutive occasion(s), the City may assess an administrative citation and fine, pursuant to 6-3.2.09(e). Such fine shall be in addition to any contamination processing fee or penalty assessed by a hauler if authorized by its agreement or contract with the City. (4) With the exception of violations of generator contamination of container contents addressed under Sub Section (d)(3), the City shall issue a Notice of Violation requiring compliance within 60 days of issuance of the notice. (5) Absent compliance by the respondent within the deadline set forth in the Notice of Violation, The City shall commence an action to impose penalties, via an administrative citation and fine, pursuant to 6-3.2.09(e). Notices shall be sent to the owner at the address of the dwelling or Commercial property or to the party responsible for paying for the collection services, depending upon available information. (e) Penalty Amounts for Types of Violations
The penalty levels are as follows:
(1 )
violation.
(2)
violation.

For a first violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $50 per For a second violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $100 per (3) For a third or subsequent violation, the amount of the base penalty shall be $250 per violation.
(f) Compliance Deadline Extension Considerations
The City may extend the compliance deadlines set forth in a Notice of Violation issued in accordance with this Section if it finds that there are extenuating circumstances beyond the control of the respondent that make compliance within the deadlines impracticable, including the following:
(1) Acts of God such as earthquakes, wildfires, flooding, and other emergencies or natural disasters.
500
(2) Delays in obtaining discretionary permits or other government agency approvals; or,
(3) Deficiencies in Organic Waste recycling infrastructure or Edible Food Recovery capacity and the Jurisdiction is under a corrective action plan with CalRecycie pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18996.2 due to those deficiencies. (g) Administrative Hearing
Persons receiving an administrative citation containing a penalty for an uncorrected violation may request an administrative hearing to contest the citation. A hearing will be held only if it is requested within the time prescribed and consistent with procedures in Title 4 Chapter 11 of the Los Banos Municipal Code. (h) Education Period for Non-Compliance
Beginning January 1,2022 and through December 31,2023, the City will conduct Inspections to determine compliance, and if City determines that Organic Waste Generator, Self-Hauler, hauler, Tier One Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not in compliance, it shall provide educational materials to the entity describing its obligations under this ordinance and a notice that compliance is required by January 1, 2022, and that violations may be subject to administrative penalties starting on January 1, 2024. (i) Civil Penalties for Non-Compliance
Beginning January 1, 2024, if the City determines that an Organic Waste Generator, Self-Hauler, hauler, Tier One or Tier Two Commercial Edible Food Generator, Food Recovery Organization, Food Recovery Service, or other entity is not in compliance with this ordinance, it shall document the noncompliance or violation, issue a Notice of Violation, and take Enforcement Action pursuant to this Chapter, as needed.

Sec. 6-3.2.10 Effective Date
This Chapter shall be effective commencing on January 1, 2022.

Section 2. To the extent that the terms and provisions of this Ordinance may be inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or conditions of any prior City ordinance, motion, resolution, rule or regulation governing the same subject, the terms of this Ordinance shall prevail with respect to the subject matter thereof and such inconsistent or conflicting provisions of prior ordinances, motions, resolutions, rules or regulations are hereby repealed.

Section 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase added by this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such 501
decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective.

Section 4. The subject Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3) and 15061 (b)(3). The activity is not subject to CEQA because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment; the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378, and the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Section 5. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation on January 1, 2022. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted and published once within fifteen days after passage and adoption as may be required by law; or, in the alternative the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within fifteen days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

Introduced by Council Member and seconded by Council Member _____ on the __ day of _____ , 2021.

Passed on the __ day of _____ , 2021 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members
NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Manuel Thomas Faria, III, Mayor
ATTEST:
502
Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk
503
504
Organic Waste Is the Largest Waste Stream in California 1 IN 5 CALIFORNIANS ARE
FooolNSECURE
Non
Organic
waste
48%
Greenwast~oodwaste
Paper
14%
9%
Other
Organics
9%
Foodwaste
13%

CALIFORNIA

DISPOSED OF
APPROXIMATELY 24

MILLION TONS OF

ORGANIC WASTE IN
2018
505
506
58 1383 Key Implementation Dates
September
2016
S81383
Adopted
Jan. 2019
Two Years of
Informal Rulemaking
Ends. Formal
Rulemaking Begins
Fall 2020
Regulations
Adopted
Jan. 1,2020
50 Percent
Reduction in Organic
Waste Dis osal
2016-2019 2020 2021
Jan. 1,2022
Regulations Take
Effect and State
Enforcement
Begins
Jan. 1,2024
January 1, 2025
507
508
Provide Organics
Collection Services to All
Residents and Businesses
Conduct Education and
Outreach to Community
Secure Access to
Recycling and Edible
Food Recovery Capacity
Establish Edible Food
Recovery Program
Procure Recyclable and
Recovered Organic
Products
Monitor Compliance
and Conduct
Enforcement
509
58 1383 INAcTION

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

ROLES AND

RESPONSIBILITIES
S8 1383 doesn't just apply
to waste management and
recycling departments.

Every local department
plays a role in S8 1383
implementation.
510
58 1383 IN ACTION

JURISDICTION

REQUIREMENTS
m
Provide organics collection
service to all residents and
businesses
Organic Waste Collection Services
. -
,: I,
11",. I.

Three-Container "source separated" Collection
Service
• Organics prohibited from black container
• All organic waste segregated for collection and
recycling
Two-Container Collection Service
• One container for collection of segregated
organic waste
• One container for collection of mixed waste
(subject to 75% organic content recovery standard)
One-Container Collection Service
• One container for collection of mixed waste (subject to 75% organic content recovery standard)
• Minimum contamination monitoring and reduction requirements • Collection waivers authorized for certain documented circumstances 511
en ::om
CD en m
m (')iU
0C" ~
<- "';:C!2 CN CD _.
~~ Al
m m 00
OO r- CN "'Cm G') O m -,c. - :::o<-n z o _.
cc2:
;CD »mO »
3" s:~O (.')
° C -I ° c. -
0 Z
512
58 1383 IN ACTION

EDUCATION

REQUIREMENTS
Conduct Education and
Outreach to Community
513
58 1383 IN ACTION

PROCUREMENT

REQUIREMENTS
Procure Recycled and
Recovered Organic
Products
514
515
58 1383 IN ACTION

INFRASTRUCTURE

REQUIREMENTS
Evaluating Current
Infrastructure and Planning
New Compost and AD
Facilities and Edible Food
Recovery
516
58 1383 IN ACTION

INSPECTION AND

ENFORCEMENT

REQUIREMENTS
Monitor Compliance and
Conduct Enforcement
517
518
S8 1383 IN
ACTION

JURISDICTION

REQUIREMENTS
Maintain Records and
Report to Cal Recycle
519
m
z
II
O(1J
~~ m~
s:m
m
z
--I
520
521
Cal Recycle
STAY

ENGAGED
https:llwww2.calrecycle.ca.gov/Listservs/
Subscribe/152
William Via
Public Works
Operations
Mana er
522

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
523
LOS Banos
\ (,0 \'0 ,eI oj
Agenda Staff Report
TO: Mayor Faria and City Council Members
FROM: William A. Vaughn, City Attorney
DATE: January 5, 2022
TYPE OF REPORT: Regular Agenda
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS

DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY

TO THE FORMER LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO
THE CITY OF LOS BANOS [026-141-002, 026-171-011 and 026- 161-001]

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt Resolution No __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS
BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS [APN No. 026-141-002]

2. Adopt Resolution No __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS
BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS [APN No. 026-171-011 and 026-161-001]
524

BACKGROUND
AB1x 26 was enacted in June 2011 and after a California Supreme Court ruling, all redevelopment agencies (over 400 statewide) in California were dissolved effective February 1, 2012.

The Los Banos Designated Local Authority (DLA), as Successor Agency to the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency, is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency.

In accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the below described properties to the City was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the transfer of the properties by letter dated September 20,2018.

The City Council previously on August 18, 2021, November 3, 2021, and December 15, 2021 approved acceptance of the following eight (8) parcels from the DLA:
• APN No. 025-054-007: 1.15 acre parcel located on 2nd and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); developed with a public walking trail and neighborhood park - former Pacheco Oil Site.
• APN No. 025-072-036: 7.85 acre parcel located on H Street between 4th and ih Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); developed with a public walking trail and the Henry Miller Plaza.
• APN No. 025-114-013: This is a 1.1 acre parcel located on G Street between 9th Street (future) and 10th Streets (future); currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped.
• APN No. 025-114-011: This is a 0.92 acres parcel located on ih and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped.
• APN No. 026-141-001: This is a 0.86 acre parcel located on 10th Street (future) and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped. • APN No. 083-100-081: This is a 11.79 acre parcel located on Ward Road and Gilbert Gonzalez Jr Drive; currently zoned Public Facility (P-F) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-N); partially developed with a public water storage 525
tank facility and storm drainage system. This parcel is immediately east of the Gilbert Gonzalez Apartments.
• APN No. 083-100-084: This is a 8.21 acre parcel located on Gilbert Gonzalez Jr Drive; currently zoned High Density Residential (R-3); currently undeveloped.

This parcel is immediately west of the Gilbert Gonzalez Apartments. • APN No. 025-201-010: This is a 0.13 acre parcel located downtown Los Banos at 644/646 I Street; currently zoned Mixed (M-X); undeveloped.

DISCUSSION
The following three (3) parcels are now being presented to the City Council for acceptance.

1. APN No. 026-141-002: .68 acre parcel located between Mercey Springs Road and the future 10th Street extension; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); partially developed with a public walking trail.
/
IIh
-
The compensation agreement entered into by the City of Los Banos and the other taxing entities provides that this parcel is designated for continued governmental use.
526
Governmental use properties must remain dedicated for governmental use for a period of twenty (20) years. Should the City within twenty (20) years from the effective date of the compensation agreement sell the properties for a non-governmental use, the net proceeds are to be divided proportionately with the other taxing entities. After said twenty (20) year period, City may sell or use the property, for any lawful purpose free and clear from all conditions set forth in the compensation agreement.

On June 18, 2020 the DLA and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board recorded a land use covenant restricting the use of portions of this parcel to non-residential uses due to residual arsenic impacts. The pertinent restrictive provisions of the LUC are set forth as follows:
"The Restricted Property may not be put to any of the following uses by Owners/Occupants:
(1) A residence, including any mobile home or factory-built housing, used as residential human habitation.
(2) A hospital or urgent care center for humans.
(3) A public or private school for persons under 18 years of age. (4) A day care center for children."
In addition, no activities that will disturb the soil (e.g., digging, excavation, grading, removal, trenching, filling, earth movement or mining), shall be allowed within the impacted areas without prior written approval from the Central Valley Water Board.

On September 27, 2020 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a notice of no further action required for the Los Banos Rails to Trails (which includes the subject parcel) concerning arsenic impacts to soil at the site.

While the No Further Action Letter may represent a determination by a regulatory agency that a particular party has satisfied its obligations to remediate a release of hazardous substances under an environmental statute, the NFA letter usually will not operate to cut off potential common law toxic tort claims for bodily injury or property damage.

On November 24, 2021 the City obtained a condition of title guarantee from TransCounty Title Company. The guarantee shows the title to the property vested in Redevelopment Agency of The City Los Banos. There are no exceptions to title which are major concerns which would affect the City Council's decision to accept the Grant Deed.

2. APN No. 026-161-001: 2.20 acre parcel located between Mercey Springs Road and the future 10th Street extension; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); partially developed with a public walking trail.
527
G ST
i'!JiIl·/hlfm!lS1.~l.ikSf'l~ ~ : .
"11
",.

IIf1
1t5~
IISi

1.l14
I
-1
I ~
' ,"
0 Z
it
~
I- I'

71. The compensation agreement entered into by the City of Los Banos and the other taxing entities provides that this parcel is designated for continued governmental use.

Governmental use properties must remain dedicated for governmental use for a period of twenty (20) years. Should the City within twenty (20) years from the effective date of the compensation agreement sell the properties for a non-governmental use, the net proceeds are to be divided proportionately with the other taxing entities. After said twenty (20) year period, City may sell or use the property, for any lawful purpose free and clear from all conditions set forth in the compensation agreement.

On September 27, 2020 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a notice of no further action required for the Los Banos Rails to Trails (which includes the subject parcel) concerning arsenic impacts to soil at the site.

While the No Further Action Letter may represent a determination by a regulatory agency that a particular party has satisfied its obligations to remediate a release of hazardous substances under an environmental statute, the NFA letter usually will not operate to cut off potential common law toxic tort claims for bodily injury or property damage.

This parcel is not subject to a land use covenant.
528
On November 24, 2021 the City obtained a condition of title guarantee from TransCounty Title Company. The guarantee shows the title to the property vested in Redevelopment Agency of The City Los Banos. There are no exceptions to title which are major concerns which would affect the City Council's decision to accept the Grant Deed.

3. APN No. 026-171-011: 1.3 acre parcel located between Mercey Springs Road and the future 10th Street extension; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); partially developed with a public walking trail.
'HI
The compensation agreement entered into by the City of Los Banos and the other taxing entities provides that this parcel is designated for continued governmental use.

Governmental use properties must remain dedicated for governmental use for a period of twenty (20) years. Should the City within twenty (20) years from the effective date of the compensation agreement sell the properties for a non-governmental use, the net proceeds are to be divided proportionately with the other taxing entities. After said twenty (20) year period, City may sell or use the property, for any lawful purpose free and clear from all conditions set forth in the compensation agreement. 529
On September 27, 2020 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a notice of no further action required for the Los Banos Rails to Trails (which includes the subject parcel) concerning arsenic impacts to soil at the site.

While the No Further Action Letter may represent a determination by a regulatory agency that a particular party has satisfied its obligations to remediate a release of hazardous substances under an environmental statute, the NFA letter usually will not operate to cut off potential common law toxic tort claims for bodily injury or property damage.

This parcel is not subject to a land use covenant.

On November 24, 2021 the City obtained a condition of title guarantee from TransCounty Title Company. The guarantee shows the title to the property vested in Redevelopment Agency of The City Los Banos. There are no exceptions to title which are major concerns which would affect the City Council's decision to accept the Grant Deed.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.

CONCLUSION
Government Code Section 27281 requires that deeds conveying an interest in real property to a governmental agency for public purposes may be accepted for recordation only with the consent of the agency evidenced by a resolution. In order to accept title to any real property interest, the City Council must authorize acceptance and recordation of title with the County Recorder.
(,,\,
\.
ms, Finance Director
Proposed Resolutions
530

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
531
RESOLUTION NO. __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS

BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS
[APN No. 026-141-002]
WHEREAS, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1 X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of California in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et ai, Case No. S 194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation, the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency was dissolved effective February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Los Banos Designated Local Authority, As Successor Agency to the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Los Banos as follows:

SECTION I: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

SECTION 2: The City hereby accepts the grant deed, attached hereto from the Successor Agency of the former Los Banos Redevelopment Agency to the City of Los Banos.

SECTION 3: The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Certificate of Acceptance.
532
The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 5th day of January 2022, by City Council Member ____ , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by City Council Member , and the Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Manuel Thomas Faria III, Mayor
ATTEST:

Lucille L Mallonee, City Clerk
533

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
RE: APN No: 026-141-002

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Grant Deed
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1 X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of Califomia in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v.

Ana Matosantos, et aI, Case No. S194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation (collectively, the "Dissolution Act'), the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency ("Redevelopment Agency") was dissolved effective February 1, 2012.

The LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under Califomia Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency. In accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the DeSignated Local Authority on June 29,2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

ACCORDINGLY, FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Grantor, LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A) hereby GRANT(S) to
Grantee, CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
534
All of its right, title and interest in and to the following described real property in the City of Los Banos, County of Merced, State of California:

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
Dated: January _, 2022 LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized
and existing under California Health and Safety Code
Section 34173( d)(3)(A)
By: __________________________ _
Michael Amabile, Chairman
535

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On _ ________ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
536

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
537

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property located in the City of Los Banos, County of Merced, State of California, described as follows:

Assessors Parcel No.: 026-141-002-
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Block 54, of said map, thence South 61 deg. 18' 00" East, a distance of 294.44 feet to the Southeast corner of said Block 54 and the East Boundary of the Town of Los Banos, according to said map;
Thence, South 00 deg. ~O' 00" West, along said East Boundary, a distance of 114.01 feet to the Northeast corner of Block 55 of said map;
Thence, North 61 deg. 18' 00" West, along the Northeasterly line of said Block 55, a distance of 349.19 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said Block 55 and the Southeasterly line of Tenth Street;
Thence, North 28 deg. 42' 00" East, along the Northeasterly prolongation of the Southeasterly line of Tenth Street, a distance of 100.00 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said Block 54 and the point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom, all minerals and all mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered underlying the property, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, oil and gas and rights thereto, together with the sole, exclusive and perpetual right to explore for remove and dispose of said minerals by any means or methods suitable to Grantor, its successors and assigns, but without entering upon or using the surface of the property, and in such manner as not to damage the surface of the property or to interfere with the use thereof by Grantee, its successors or assigns as reserved by Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation (formerly known as Southern Pacific Transportation Company) in Quitclaim Deed recorded November 9, 2001 in Book 4309, Page 91 as Series No. 51128 of Official Records, Merced County.
538

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Government Code, Section 27281
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated January _, 2022 from the LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY to the CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City Council of the City of Los Banos ("City Council") pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. of the City Council adopted on January _, 2022 and the City of Los Banos consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
By: ____ ~~~--~~------------ Josh Pinheiro, City Manager ATTEST:

By: ____________________________ __
Lucille Mallonee, City Clerk
539

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On _ ________ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
540

PROVOST&

PRITCHARD
'a·h4H'iSiN!ia~!·!'ii
An Employee Own8d CompilflY
t o 25 50
Feet
Restricted Property
Property - APN-n?R-141-002.mxd
Land Use Covenant
Exhibit C
APN: 026·141·002
Los Banos Rail Trail
Los Banos, CA
541
RESOLUTION NO. __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS

BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS
[APN No. 026-171-011 and 026-161-001]
WHEREAS, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of California in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et ai, Case No. S194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation, the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency was dissolved effective February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Los Banos Designated Local Authority, As Successor Agency to the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Los Banos as follows:

SECTION I: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

SECTION 2: The City hereby accepts the grant deed, attached hereto from the Successor Agency of the former Los Banos Redevelopment Agency to the City of Los Banos.

SECTION 3: The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Certificate of Acceptance.
542
The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 5th day of January 2022, by City Council Member _ ___ , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by City Council Member , and the Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Manuel Thomas Faria III, Mayor
ATTEST:

Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk
543

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
RE: APN No: 026-171-011 and 026-161-001

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Grant Deed
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of California in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v.

Ana Matosantos, et aI, Case No. S194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation (collectively, the "Dissolution Act'), the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency ("Redevelopment Agency") was dissolved effective February 1, 2012.

The LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency. In accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

ACCORDINGLY, FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Grantor, LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A) hereby GRANT(S) to
Grantee, CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
544
All of its right, title and interest in and to the following described real property in the City of Los Banos, County of Merced, State of California:

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
Dated: January _, 2022 LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized
and existing under California Health and Safety Code
Section 34173( d)(3) (A)
By: ____________ ~~~---------
Michael Amabile, Chairman
545

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On _________ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
546

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
547

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property located in the City of los Banos, County of Merced, State of California, described as follows:

Assessor Parcel Number(s): 026-171-011 and 026-161-001
All that portion of the railroad Reservation of San Pablo and Tulare Railroad as shown by a map of "Miller and lux's Subdivision of lands at los Banos, Merced Co., Cal", filed for record on November 28, 1890 in Volume 2 of Official Plats, Page 18 thereof, Merced County Records, lying within Section 14, Township 10 South, Range 10 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, being more particularly described as follows:

Beginning at the Southwest corner of lot 52 of said map, thence South 61 deg. 21' 00" East, along the Southwesterly lines of lot 52, lot 51 and lot 49 of said map, a distance of 1487.57 feet to the Westerly line of Parcel 2, Mercey Springs Road, as described in the Quitclaim Deed from Southern Pacific Transportation Company to the City of los Banos recorded December 9, 1997 in Volume 3663 at Page 929, Merced County Records:

Thence, South 00 deg. 00' 00" East, along said Westerly line, a distance of 80.04 feet to an angle point therein;
Thence South 44 deg. 31' 31" West, along said Westerly line, a distance of 30.90 feet to the Southwesterly line of said railroad reservation and the Northeasterly line of lot 1, of said map; Thence, North 61 deg. 21' 00" West, along the Northeasterly line of said lot 1 and lot 2 of said map, a distance of 1462.85 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said lot 2; Thence North 00 deg. 00' 00" East along the Northerly prolongation of the Westerly line of said Parcel 2, a distance of 114.01 feet to the Southwesterly corner of said lot 52 and the point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom, all minerals and all mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered underlying the property, including, within, limiting the generality of the foregoing oil and gas and rights thereto, together with the sole, exclusive and perpetual right to explore for, remove and dispose of said minerals by any means or methods suitable to Grantor, its successors and assigns, but without entering upon or using the surface of the property and in such manner as not to damage the surface of the property or to interfere with the use thereof by Grantee, its successor or assigns.
548

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Government Code, Section 27281
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated January _, 2022 from the LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY to the CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City Council of the City of Los Banos ("City Council") pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. of the City Council adopted on January _, 2022 and the City of Los Banos consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
By: ____ ~~~~~------------ Josh Pinheiro, City Manager
ATTEST:

By: __ ~~~ __ ~=-~~ ______ __ Lucille Mallonee, City Clerk 549

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On _________ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
550

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
551
LOS Banos
(h . () 'O(l I OJ
Agenda Staff Report
TO: Mayor Faria and City Council Members
FROM: William A. Vaughn, City Attorney
DATE: January 5, 2022
TYPE OF REPORT: Regular Agenda
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS

DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY

TO THE FORMER LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO
THE CITY OF LOS BANOS [025-114-010]

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt Resolution No __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS
BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS [APN No. 025-114-010J

BACKGROUND
AB1x 26 was enacted in June 2011 and after a California Supreme Court ruling, all redevelopment agencies (over 400 statewide) in California were dissolved effective February 1,2012.

The Los Banos Designated Local Authority (DLA), as Successor Agency to the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency, is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former 552
Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency.

In accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the below described properties to the City was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the transfer of the properties by letter dated September 20, 2018.

The City Council previously on August 18, 2021, November 3, 2021, and December 15, 2021 approved acceptance of the following eight (8) parcels from the DLA:
• APN No. 025-054-007: 1.15 acre parcel located on 2nd and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); developed with a public walking trail and neighborhood park - former Pacheco Oil Site.
• APN No. 025-072-036: 7.85 acre parcel located on H Street between 4th and 7th Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); developed with a public walking trail and the Henry Miller Plaza.
• APN No. 025-114-013: This is a 1.1 acre parcel located on G Street between 9th Street (future) and 10th Streets (future); currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped.
• APN No. 025-114-011: This is a 0.92 acres parcel located on ih and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped.
• APN No. 026-141-001: This is a 0.86 acre parcel located on 10th Street (future) and G Street; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); undeveloped. • APN No. 083-100-081: This is a 11.79 acre parcel located on Ward Road and Gilbert Gonzalez Jr Drive; currently zoned Public Facility (P-F) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-N); partially developed with a public water storage tank facility and storm drainage system. This parcel is immediately east of the Gilbert Gonzalez Apartments.
• APN No. 083-100-084: This is a 8.21 acre parcel located on Gilbert Gonzalez Jr Drive; currently zoned High Density Residential (R-3); currently undeveloped.

This parcel is immediately west of the Gilbert Gonzalez Apartments. • APN No. 025-201-010: This is a 0.13 acre parcel located downtown Los Banos at 644/646 I Street; currently zoned Mixed (M-X); undeveloped. 553

DISCUSSION
The following property is now being presented to the City Council for acceptance.

APN No. 025-114-010: 5.63 acre parcel located between ih Street and the future 10th Street extension; currently zoned Rail Corridor (RC); developed with a public walking trail.

The compensation agreement entered into by the City of Los Banos and the other taxing entities provides that this parcel is designated for continued governmental use.

Governmental use properties must remain dedicated for governmental use for a period of twenty (20) years. Should the City within twenty (20) years from the effective date of the compensation agreement sell the properties for a non-governmental use, the net proceeds are to be divided proportionately with the other taxing entities. After said twenty (20) year period, City may sell or use the property, for any lawful purpose free and clear from all conditions set forth in the compensation agreement.

On June 18, 2020 the DLA and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board recorded a land use covenant restricting the use of portions of this parcel to non-residential uses due to residual arsenic impacts. The pertinent restrictive provisions of the LUC are set forth as follows:
554
"The Restricted Property may not be put to any of the following uses by Owners/Occupants:
(1) A residence, including any mobile home or factory-built housing, used as residential human habitation.
(2) A hospital or urgent care center for humans.
(3) A public or private school for persons under 18 years of age. (4) A day care center for children."
In addition, no activities that will disturb the soil (e.g., digging, excavation, grading, removal, trenching, filling, earth movement or mining), shall be allowed within the impacted areas without prior written approval from the Central Valley Water Board.

On September 27, 2020 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a notice of no further action required for the Los Banos Rails to Trails (which includes the subject parcel) concerning arsenic impacts to soil at the site.

While the No Further Action Letter may represent a determination by a regulatory agency that a particular party has satisfied its obligations to remediate a release of hazardous substances under an environmental statute, the NFA letter usually will not operate to cut off potential common law toxic tort claims for bodily injury or property damage.

On November 24, 2021 the City obtained a condition of title guarantee from TransCounty Title Company. The guarantee shows the title to the property vested in Redevelopment Agency of The City Los Banos. There are no exceptions to title which are major concerns which would affect the City Council's decision to accept the Grant Deed.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
None.

CONCLUSION
Government Code Section 27281 requires that deeds conveying an interest in real property to a governmental agency for public purposes may be accepted for recordation only with the consent of the agency evidenced by a resolution. In order to accept title to any real property interest, the City Council must authorize acceptance and recordation of title with the ounty Recorder.

Reviewed bY:; ~'l~
Josh Pinheiro, C ty Manager
/\
Sonya QA.;Willi s, Fmance
L< ~ Director
555
Attachments:

Proposed Resolution
556

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
557
RESOLUTION NO. __

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS

ACCEPTING THE GRANT DEED FROM THE LOS BANOS DESIGNATED

LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE FORMER LOS

BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO THE CITY OF LOS BANOS
[APN No. 025-114-010]
WHEREAS, pursuant to Assembly Bill 1 X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of California in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v. Ana Matosantos, et ai, Case No. S194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation, the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency was dissolved effective February 1, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the Los Banos Designated Local Authority, As Successor Agency to the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29, 2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Los Banos as follows:

SECTION I: The recitals set forth above are true and correct and are incorporated into this Resolution by reference.

SECTION 2: The City hereby accepts the grant deed, attached hereto from the Successor Agency of the former Los Banos Redevelopment Agency to the City of Los Banos.

SECTION 3: The City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute the Certificate of Acceptance.
558
The foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Los Banos held on the 5th day of January 2022, by City Council Member ____ , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by City Council Member , and the Resolution was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

APPROVED:

Manuel Thomas Faria III, Mayor
ATTEST:
lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk
559

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
RE: APN No: 025-114-010

EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27383

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
Grant Deed
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 1X 26, enacted in June 2011, and as modified by the Supreme Court of the State of California in the matter of California Redevelopment Association, et al. v.

Ana Matosantos, et ai, Case No. S194861, and further modified by Assembly Bill 1484, enacted in June 2012, and other subsequent legislation (collectively, the "Dissolution Act'), the Los Banos Redevelopment Agency ("Redevelopment Agency") was dissolved effective February 1, 2012.

The LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173( d)(3)(A), is the successor entity to the former Redevelopment Agency and is responsible for the wind-down of the affairs of the former Redevelopment Agency, including without limitation the disposition of assets and properties of the former Redevelopment Agency. In accordance with applicable law, the transfer of the Property was approved by the Oversight Board to the Designated Local Authority on June 29,2018, by Oversight Board Resolution 2018-014. The Oversight Board approval was submitted to the California Department of Finance in accordance with applicable law, which approved the sale and transfer of the Property by letter dated September 20, 2018.

ACCORDINGLY, FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Grantor, LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized and existing under California Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(3)(A) hereby GRANT(S) to
Grantee, CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
560
All of its right, title and interest in and to the following described real property in the City of Los Banos, County of Merced, State of California:

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A
Dated: January _, 2022 LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS

SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, a public entity organized
and existing under California Health and Safety Code
Section 34173{ d)(3)(A)
By: __________ ~--~-----------
Michael Amabile, Chairman
561

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On ------------------ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
562

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
563

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property located in the City of Los Banos, County of Merced, State of California, described as follows:

Assessors Parcel No.: 025-114-010
Beginning at the Southwest corner of Block 51, of said map, thence South 61 deg. 18' 00" East, along the Southwesterly line of said Block 51 and a line that is parallel with and 100.00 feet perpendicular to the Southwesterly line of "G" Street, a distance of 960.00 feet to the Southwesterly corner of Block 53, of said map;
Thence, Southeast 55 deg. 35' 22" East, a distance of 402.00 feet to the Northwesterly line of Tenth Street, being South 28 deg. 42' 00" West, along said Northwesterly line a distance of 140.00 feet from the Northeast corner of said Block 53; Thence, South 28 deg. 42' 00" West, along said Northwesterly line a distance of 30.00 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said Block 53;
Thence, continuing South 28 det. 42' 00" West, along the Southwesterly prolongation of the Northwesterly line of Tenth Street, a distance of 100.00 feet to the Northeasterly corner of Block 56, of said map;
Thence, North 61 deg. 18' 00" West, along the Northeast line of said Block 56, a distance of 400.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Block 56;
Thence, South 28 deg. 42' 00" West, along the Northwesterly line of Block 56, a distance of

25.00 feet;
Thence, North 61 deg. 18' 00" West, along a line that is parallel with and 75.00 feet perpendicular to the Northeasterly line of "H" Street, a distance of 560.00 feet; Thence, North 28 deg. 42' 00" East, a distance of 5.00 feet; Thence, North 61 deg. 18' 00" West, along a line that is parallel with and 80.00 feet perpendicular to the Northeasterly line of "H" Street, a distance of 400.00 feet to the Northeasterly prolongation of the Southeasterly line of Seventh Street; Thence, North 28 deg. 42' 00" East, along said Northeasterly prolongation, a distance of 190.00 feet to the point of beginning.

Excepting therefrom, all minerals and all mineral rights of every kind and character now known to exist or hereafter discovered underlying the property, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, oil and gas and rights thereto, together with the sole, exclusive and perpetual right to explore for, remove and dispose of said minerals by any means or methods suitable to Grantor, its successors and assigns, but without entering upon or using the surface of the property, and in such manner as not to damage the surface of the property or to interfere with 564
the use thereof by Grantee, its successors or assigns, as reserved by Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation (formerly known as Southern Pacific Transportation Company) in Quitclaim Deed recorded November 9, 2001 in Book 4309, Page 91 as Series No. 51128 of Official Records, Merced County.
565

CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
Government Code, Section 27281
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the interest in real property conveyed by Grant Deed dated January _, 2022 from the LOS BANOS DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY, AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE LOS BANOS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY to the CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the City Council of the City of Los Banos ("City Council") pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. of the City Council adopted on January _, 2022 and the City of Los Banos consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.

CITY OF LOS BANOS, a municipal corporation
By: ______ =-____ ~---------------- Josh Pinheiro, City Manager ATTEST:

By: ________________ ~~~--------
Lucille Mallonee, City Clerk
566

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this
certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is
attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or
validity of that document.

State of California )
County of )
On ------------------ before me,
personally appeared
, Notary Public
(insert name and title of the officer)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
567

← All documents from this meeting