YOSEMITE
/ LAKE \
( BURl)IS
J ~ ½ > -:'A' _,, _,,4 BEA,
• . - f I - -~ ~ bW!:NS
·Me'l'cect' ® - J MARIPOSA , ,. ,_~- • 4 ./ .
,'CJ -~- ,.) 2 ) ~ -=¥~"
,,...i-. _ ~ti . ,/ .....).&BUCHANAN
, - -- --~ ,.. ~ -.· 1 ~ l '\. . -... • < ,I
··~1-,,~ :::,t'·- r:-'-f.-·~ . ... . _ '-,~T .... _,._)!-~.,.= -~-"'~-·._,.. ~ t. -- ~ . '.J ·~!s a '!.. •1 ---~\ •
i ., ® p ,-· Do.s a -·! )
~I\IQS \
DETE\TION .••
\,
·;,
'
.HIDDEN
MADERA .
~
MADERA LAKE/
\
" t ) ~ . ~ ( '"\ .'k\ •--. I -------.... . • •
\ , . : ~~'PANOCHE
. / 'l.SA"'t BE~NITO "! r1~ t:I r>E11:~ TION \. ~ ... -....... ...,
FRESNO
'\. '; ~✓ "- -~ ' ''lr·-~•~ r~-.._-y,--,. J' ~ / . .,.•' ~ . ·, \ \_ . - ~
~.,- "
'-.J...,_
Map compiled 3/2021;
'"OOd Intended for planning purposes only.
""' , Data Source: Merced County, USFWS,
0 5
l.J....l..LJ...
"v
\
10Miles
L.J
Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (OSOD), Flood Emergency Response lnfonnation Exchange (FERIX) •
...
•
•
. ...
N
A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-26
273
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
Standard practice among federal and state dam safety offices is to classify a dam according to the potential impact a dam failure (breach) or mis-operation (unscheduled release) would have on downstream areas. The hazard potential classification system categorizes dams based on the probable loss of human life and the impacts on economic, environmental and lifeline facilities. The US Army Corp of Engineers uses three categories to classify dams' potential hazard to life and property:
• High hazard indicates that a failure would most probably result in the loss of life; • Significant hazard indicates that a failure could result in appreciable property damage; • Low hazard indicates that failure would result in only minimal property damage and loss of life is unlikely.
• Undetermined hazard dams have not been rated or their hazard rating is not known In addition to these, high, significant, and low hazard classifications the California Division of Dam Safety (DSOD) adds the fourth category of "Extremely High". The DSOD defines this fourth category as "expected to cause considerable loss of human life or would result in an inundation area with a population of 1,000 or more" (DSOD 2020). As shown in Table 4-11 two dams in Merced County, Lake Yosemite and Castle dams are classified as "Extremely High".
In 2017 the State of California established the Spillway Re-evaluation Program after the Orville Dam incident, to assess spillways to confirm they meet minimum safety standards. The Don Pedro dam located in Tuolumne County was listed as being part of this program and poses a risk to central portions of Merced County.
Since the County has several high and significant hazard dams, there is potential for loss of life and property damage. The inundation areas for each of the dams are generally downstream and include large rural and urban areas on the valley floor below the dams. Adjacent jurisdictions could also be affected by a dam failure in Merced County. The extent of impacts depends on the nature of failure and location of the dam. The largest populations potentially at risk would be in Merced, Livingston, and Atwater. The central portions of the unincorporated areas county would also be impacted were a dam to fail and flood downstream.
Past Occurrences
There is no history of dam failure affecting the county, but according to the HMPT there have been recurring issues with flooding due to high flows released below dams in the area.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Occasional-The County remains at risk to dam failures from numerous dams under a variety of ownership and control and of varying ages and conditions. However, based on historical experience darn failure is unlikely in the area. Nevertheless, given the number of dams of concern in the County the potential exists for future dam failures in Merced County, but the likelihood of this is low. Uncontrolled or controlled release flooding as well as spillway flooding below dams due to excessive rain or runoff are more likely to occur than failures.
Climate Change Considerations
The potential for climate change to affect the likelihood of dam failure is not fully understood at this point in time. With a potential for more extreme precipitation events a result of climate change, this could result in large inflows to reservoirs. However, this could be offset by generally lower reservoir levels if storage 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-27
274
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
water resources become more limited or stretched in the future due to climate change, drought and/or population growth.
Vulnerability Assessment
A dam incident can range from a small, uncontrolled release to a catastrophic failure. Vulnerability to dam failures is confined to the areas and populations subject to inundation downstream of the facility.
Secondary losses would include loss of the multi-use functions of the dam itself and associated revenues that accompany those functions.
General Property
In general, communities located below a high or significant hazard dam and along a waterway are potentially exposed to the impacts of a dam failure. Inundation maps that identify anticipated flooded areas (which may not coincide with known floodplains) are typically produced for all high hazard dams and included in the Emergency Action Plan (EAP) required for each dam. A GIS layer that contained inundation maps for four of the 34 high hazard dams that affect the County was analyzed to quantify risk across the planning area. Table 4-13 through Table 4-16 summarize the estimated building exposure (more details on the parcel analysis methodology under the Asset Summary section). Table 4-12 summarizes the results of the GIS analysis, and includes a population estimate based on the number of residential parcels exposed, multiplied by an average household size estimate from the census. Exposure estimates from failure of other high hazard dams were not possible due to data restrictions and/or limitations.
Table 4-13 Summary of Dam Inundation by Dam and Jurisdiction Dam Jurisdiction Improved Building Population Parcel Count Count Livinqston 1 1 -
Don Pedro Dam Unincoroorated 3,888 4,909 8,353
Total 3,889 4,910 8,353
Livinoston 1 1 -
Mcswain Dam Unincorporated 160 180 309
Total 161 181 309
Atwater 37 37 -
New Exchequer Dam Livinqston 3,340 4,001 14,216
Unincoroorated 8,869 11,138 19,505
Total 12,246 15,176 33,721
Atwater 21 23 67
Yosemite Dam Merced 4,768 6,080 18,784
Unincorporated 1,024 1,359 3,214
Total 5,813 7,462 22,065
Grand Total 22,109 27,729 64,447
Source: California DSOS, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office Table 4-14 Don Pedro Dam Inundation
Jurisdiction Property Type Improved Building Count Parcel Count Livingston Aqricultural 1 1
Total 1 1
Unincorporated Aqricultural 1,352 1,968
Commercial 97 333
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-28
275
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Jurisdiction Property Type Improved Building Count Parcel Count Exempt 40 56
Industrial 15 19
Mixed Use 2 2
Residential 2,365 2,514
Vacant Land 17 17
Total 3,888 4,909
Grand Total 3,889 4,910
Source: California DSOS, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office Table 4-15 Mcswain Dam Inundation
Jurisdiction Property Type Improved Building Count Parcel Count Livingston Agricultural 1 1
Total 1 1
Agricultural 48 59
Commercial 13 18
Exempt 7 8
Unincorporated Industrial 1 1
Residential 90 93
Vacant Land 1 1
Total 160 180
Grand Total 161 181
Source: California DSOS, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office Table 4-16 New Exchequer Dam Inundation
Jurisdiction Property Type Improved Building Count
Parcel Count
Atwater
Residential 37 37
Total 37 37
Agricultural 8 9
Commercial 79 231
Exempt 48 113
Livingston Industrial 19 33
Mixed Use 3 4
Residential 3,176 3,604
Vacant Land 7 7
Total 3,340 4,001
Aoricultural 3,183 4,415
Commercial 223 603
Exempt 101 144
Unincorporated
Industrial 41 64
Mixed Use 12 15
Residential 5,273 5,860
Vacant Land 36 37
Total 8,869 11,138
Grand Total 12,246 15,176
Source: California DSOS, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office 2021-2026 Update Page 4-29
276
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-17 Lake Yosemite Dam Inundation
Jurisdiction Property Type Improved Building Count
Parcel Count
Commercial 1 2
Atwater Residential 20 21
Total 21 23
Aqricultural 5 5
Commercial 24 30
Exempt 110 134
Merced
Industrial 22 38
Mixed Use 1 1
Residential 4,603 5,869
Vacant Land 3 3
Total 4,768 6,080
Aqricultural 36 46
Commercial 34 305
Exempt 10 12
Unincorporated
Industrial 18 22
Mixed Use 3 3
Residential 917 965
Vacant Land 6 6
Total 1,024 1,359
Grand Total 5,813 7,462
Source: California DSOS, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office People
Persons located underneath or downstream of a dam are at risk of a dam failure, though the level of risk can be tempered by topography (specifically where populations are located within the inundation path of a dam), amount of water in the reservoir and time of day of the breach. Injuries and fatalities can occur from debris, bodily injury and drowning. Once a dam has breached, standing water presents all the same hazards to people as floodwater from other sources. People in the inundation area may need to be evacuated, cared for, and possibly permanently relocated. Impacts could include thousands of evacuations and likely hundreds of casualties, depending on the dam involved. Specific population impacts are noted in Table 4-12, and total people at risk were calculated by multiplying the average number of persons per household in Merced County (3.32) and each applicable incorporated jurisdiction (Atwater 3.18, Livingston
3.94, and Merced 3.20) times the number of residential parcels where dam inundation occurs. Based on the best available data accessible to the planning team at this time of this analysis, an incident at the New Exchequer Dam would potentially put the most people at risk (33,721), followed by Lake Yosemite dam (22,064) and Don Pedro dam (8,353). The unincorporated areas of Merced County have the most people (31,381) potentially exposed to a dam inundation event followed by City of Merced with potentially 18,784 exposed to the Lake Yosemite dam inundation. Population impacts from other high hazard dams were not possible due to data restrictions and/or limitations.
Critical Facilities
A total dam failure can cause catastrophic impacts to areas downstream of the water body, including critical infrastructure. Any critical asset located under the dam in an inundation area would be susceptible to the impacts of a dam failure. Of particular risk would be roads and bridges that could be vulnerable to washouts, further complicating response and recovery by cutting off impacted areas. Based on the critical facility inventory considered in the updating of this plan and intersected with the dam inundation extents 2021-2026 Update Page 4-30
277
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
available, 272 critical facilities were found to be at risk. Unincorporated County has the greatest number of facilities at risk followed by City of Merced and City of Livingston. These at risk facilities are listed in the tables below by jurisdiction and critical facility classification as based on the FEMA Lifeline categories.
Table 4-18 Dam Inundation Effects on Critical Facilities - Estimates by Jurisdiction and FEMA Lifeline
..
QI
... ni ni >.
... "' ~ ·;:: u ·;:: QI C .s: .... :s ::, C 0 Ill ra QI u ·.;::; ..: ::iE ~ QI 0 Ill ·.;::; Jurisdiction ra QI u .... "' 'a 'a ra 'i: ra ::, C C t: ::, s: 0 ra ra 0
E >- 'a .s: >. Q. i::n -a· ... ... ... E ... "' ni ra ni QI C QI 0 N ... ra ... 0 C 0 ra QI ra ... 0 u w u. J: J: Ill I- IAtwater 1 Dos Palos 0
Gustine 0
Livingston 6 1 3 3 13 5 31
Los Banos 0
Merced 4 2 6 3 3 4 13 35
Unincorporated 21 8 16 8 64 88 205
Total 31 11 25 14 3 81 107 272
Source: HFILD, Merced County, Cities of Atwater, Dos Palos, Gustine, Livingston, Los Banos, Merced As noted under the Geographic Area section, inundation data is not available for the O'Neil Forebay, Los Banos or San Luis Dams due to being restricted and sensitive information. The following is a summary of the potential impacts on critical facilities from a dam failure or inundation event. • O'Neil Forebay Dam
Potential Impacts to Transportation infrastructure:
o Interstate 5
o Highway 33
o Highway 140
Potential Impacts to Water Systems infrastructure:
o Delta Mendota
o The California Aqueduct
• Los Banos Dam
Potential impacts to Transportation infrastructure:
o Interstate 5
o Highway 152
o Highway 165
Potential impacts to Water Systems infrastructure:
o Delta Mendota
o The California Aqueduct
• San Luis Dam
Potential impacts to Transportation infrastructure:
o Interstate 5
o Highway 152
2021-2026 Update Page 4-31
278
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
o Interstate 165
o Highway 33
o Highway 140
Potential impacts to Water Systems infrastructure:
o Delta Mendota
o The California Aqueduct
Potential impacts to Power/Energy infrastructure:
o PG&E substations
o Solar fields
Economy
Extensive and long-lasting economic impacts could result from a major dam failure including the longterm loss of water in a reservoir after a failure event. Based on the analysis there is 6,504 buildings, at a minimum, that are designated as agricultural properties potentially exposed to dam inundation event. A major dam incident and loss of water from the associated reservoir could include direct business and specifically impacts to the agricultural industry, resulting in damages and indirect disruption of the local economy.
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
Dam failure effects on the environment would be similar to those caused by flooding from other causes.
Water could erode stream channels and topsoil and cover the environment with debris. For the most part the environment is resilient and would be able to rebound from whatever damages occurred, though this process could take years. However, historic and cultural resources could be affected just as housing or critical infrastructures would, were a dam to fail and cause downstream inundation that could further erode surfaces or cause scouring of structural foundations.
Future Development
GIS was used to analyze parcels exposed to dam inundation areas that are located within each city's SOI.
The results shown in Table 4-18 show that there is a total of 6,917 buildings and 18,247 currently exposed to dam inundation within the SOI areas.
Table 4-19 Total Dam Inundation Summary by Dam within Sphere of Influence Areas Dam Inundation Sphere of Improved Building Population Influence Parcel Count Count Delhi 55 55 183
Don Pedro Dam
Hilmar 1,450 1,778 4,731
Livingston 1 3 0
Total 1,506 1,836 4,914
Cressey 1 1 3
Mcswain Dam Livinqston 1 1 0
Snellina 104 111 286
Total 106 113 289
Atwater 10 12 7
Ballico 59 65 166
Cressey 78 92 262
New Exchequer Dam Delhi 1,021 1,319 3,788
Hilmar 1,450 1,778 4,731
Livingston 59 83 149
Snellina 145 170 412
2021-2026 Update Page 4-32
279
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Dam Inundation Sphere of Improved Building Population Influence Parcel Count Count Stevinson 53 65 149
Winton 98 113 375
Total 2,973 3,697 10,040
Atwater 42 44 120
Yosemite Dam Franklin 774 1,080 2,520
Merced 128 147 365
Total 944 1,271 3,005
Grand Total 5,529 6,917 18,247
Source: California DS0S, NID, Merced County Assessor's Office The areas located in the SOI for each incorporated jurisdiction are areas each City plans to grow into and potentially slated for future development. In addition to the SOI areas there are also 71 vacant parcels countywide that are within dam inundation areas. These areas should take into consideration potential impacts from dam failure risk upstream and should attempt to overlay the existing dam inundation maps with proposed future development. In the case of a dam failure, inundation would likely follow some existing FEMA mapped floodplains, which contains development restrictions for areas in the 1% annual chance floodplain, but it could exceed those floodplains and affect areas that are not regulated for flood hazards. Also, of note is that development below a low or undetermined hazard dam could increase its hazard rating, though there is only one low hazard and one undetermined hazard dam in the County (while the majority are high or significant hazard dams). Finally, added development could compromise dams and reservoir resources if populations depend on them for critical needs such as potable water during or after a dam failure event.
Risk Summary
• There are 44 dams of concern for Merced County. 10 are within the county (8 High Hazard Potential and two Significant) and 34 dams are upstream of the county (26 High Hazard and eight Significant). • Of the eight high hazard potential rated dams in the County, 2 (Castle and Yosemite dams) are rated as "Extremely High" by the State of California DSOD.
• Countywide there are a minimum of 27,729 parcels at risk based on limited available inundation mapping, with greatest number of buildings exposed in unincorporated areas (17,586) followed by the City of Merced (6,080), City of Livingston (4,003) and City of Atwater (60). • Residential property types make up the most buildings (18,963) at risk of flooding from dam failures, agricultural (6,504), and commercial (1,522).
• Based on limited available mapping, the New Exchequer Dam puts the most parcels at risk of dam inundation (33,721) countywide (most in Unincorporated and Livingston), followed by the Yosemite dam (22,065).
• An estimated 64,447 people countywide might be displaced from their homes based the location of their residences along the inundation areas; actual amounts would vary. • A total of 272 critical facilities are within dam inundation areas. The greatest number in unincorporated Merced County (205) and Transportation lifeline is most at risk countywide. • Related Hazards: drought, flooding, earthquake/liquefaction, landslide, and severe weather. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-33
280
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-20 Hazard Risk Summary by Jurisdiction - Dam Incidents Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Severity Significance Occurrence
Merced County Significant Occasional Catastrophic Medium City of Atwater Extensive Occasional Limited Medium
City of Dos Palos Limited Occasional Limited Medium
City of Gustine Extensive Occasional Limited Low
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Limited Medium
City of Los Banos Extensive Occasional Catastrophic Medium City of Merced Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High
io21-2026 Update Page 4-34
281
4.2.2 Drought
Hazard/Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard identification and Risk Assessment
Drought is a gradual phenomenon. Normally, one dry year does not constitute a drought in California, but rather serves as a reminder of the need to plan for droughts. California's extensive system of water supply infrastructure (reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance facilities) generally mitigates the effects of short-term dry periods for most water users.
Drought can have secondary impacts. For example, drought is a major determinant of wildfire hazard, in that it creates greater propensity for fire starts and larger, more prolonged conflagrations fueled by excessively dry vegetation, along with reduced water supply for firefighting purposes. Drought is also an economic hazard. Significant economic impacts on California's agriculture industry can occur as a result of short- and long-term drought conditions; these include hardships to farmers, farm workers, packers, and shippers of agricultural products. In some cases, droughts can also cause significant increases in food prices to the consumer due to shortages.
Drought is a complex issue involving many factors-it occurs when a normal amount of moisture is not available to satisfy an area's usual water-consuming activities. Drought can often be defined regionally based on its effects:
• Meteorological drought is defined by a period of substantially diminished precipitation duration and/or intensity. The commonly used definition of meteorological drought is an interval of time, generally on the order of months or years, during which the actual moisture supply at a given place consistently falls below the climatically appropriate moisture supply. • Agricultural drought occurs when there is inadequate soil moisture to meet the needs of a particular crop at a particular time. Agricultural drought usually occurs after or during meteorological drought, but before hydrological drought and can affect livestock and other dry-land agricultural operations. • Hydrological drought refers to deficiencies in surface and subsurface water supplies. It is measured as stream flow, snowpack, and as lake, reservoir, and groundwater levels. There is usually a delay between lack of rain or snow and less measurable water in streams, lakes, and reservoirs. Therefore, hydrological measurements tend to lag other drought indicators. • Socioeconomic drought occurs when physical water shortages start to affect the health, well-being, and quality of life of the people, or when the drought starts to affect the supply and demand of an economic product.
The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) says the following about drought:
"One dry year does not normally constitute a drought in California. California's extensive system of water supply infrastructure-its reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance facilitiesmitigates the effect of short-term dry periods for most water users. Defining when a drought begins is a function of drought impacts to water users. Hydrologic conditions constituting a drought for water users in one location may not constitute a drought for water users elsewhere, or for water users having a different water supply. Individual water suppliers may use criteria such as rainfall/runoff, amount of water in storage, or expected supply from a water wholesaler to define their water supply conditions." The drought issue in California is further compounded by water rights. Water is a commodity possessed under a variety of legal doctrines. The prioritization of water rights between farming and federally protected fish habitats in California is part of this issue.
Drought impacts are wide-reaching and may be economic, environmental, and/or societal. The most significant impacts associated with drought in the planning area are those related to water intensive activities such as agriculture, wildfire protection, municipal usage, commerce, tourism, recreation, and 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-35
282
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
wildlife preservation. Also, during a drought, allocations go down, which results in reduced water availability. Voluntary water conservation measures are typically implemented during extended droughts.
A reduction of electric power generation and water quality deterioration are also potential problems that can occur as a result of drought conditions. The reduced demand for electrical power generation is commonly linked to higher electricity costs due to the loss of hydropower supplies. Water quality deterioration is due to lower levels of precipitation and limited water storage supply. Drought conditions can also cause soil to compact and not absorb water well, potentially making an area more susceptible to flooding.
Geographic Area
Drought is a regional hazard, and at its worst can affect the entire state of California with varying levels of dryness and drought activity (as will be covered in more detail under the sections to follow). It is safe to assume that unless the drought event is at its very beginning or very end, if any area of the Merced County is affected by any level of drought, the other areas of the county are experiencing varying effects as well.
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) of 2014
In January 2014, Governor Brown declared an emergency proclamation due to multiple years of drought.
The proclamation called on citizens to reduce water use by 20 percent; with a subsequent executive order in April 2015 that directed urban water agencies to reduce water use by 25 percent (Ken Topping, 2016).
In September 2014, the Governor signed a three-bill package (California Senate Bills 1168 and 1319, and Assembly Bill 1739), known as the SGMA. The SGMA provides for the establishment of local GSAs to manage groundwater sustainability within the groundwater subbasins defined by the California DWR.
Within Merced County there are portions of four groundwater subbasins, Merced, Turlock, Delta Mendota, and Chowchilla, that are required under SGMA to conduct sustainable groundwater planning and management. Each of the four subbasins are required to develop and implement a GSP by 2020 or 2022.
As of April 2021, all four subbasins have formed 14 GSAs as shown in Table 4-20.
Table 4-21 Groundwater Sustainability Agencies in Merced County Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA)
Merced-lrriqation-Urban GSA
Merced Merced Subbasin GSA
Turner Island Water District GSA #1
Turlock
West Turlock GSA
East Turlock GSA
Ci ty of Dos Palos GSA
Citv of Gustine GSA
City of Los Banos GSA
Delta Mendota
Central Delta Mendota GSA
Turner Island Delta Mendota GSA
Northwestern Delta Mendota GSA
Grassland Water District GSA
San Joaquin River Exchanqe Contractors GSA
Chowchilla
Chowchilla Water District GSA
County of Merced Chowchilla GSA
Source: Merced County Water Resources https://www.co.merced.ea.us/3140/Sustainable-Groundwater---SGMA :>021-2026 Update Page 4-36
283
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
The magnitude of a drought's impact is directly related to the severity and length. The severity of a drought depends on water availability and moisture deficiency, the time period, and the size and location of the affected area. The longer the drought persists and the larger the area impacted, the more severe the potential impacts. Droughts can be a short-term event over several months or a long-term event that lasts for years or even decades. In Merced County, the onset of drought is often signaled by a lack of significant winter precipitation and snowfall (moisture deficiency) in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
Droughts typically do not result in direct impacts on people or property, but they can have significant impacts on agriculture, which can indirectly impact people and property. Hot and dry conditions that persist into spring, summer, and fall can aggravate drought conditions, making the effects of drought more pronounced as water demands increase during the growing season and summer months. Impacts increase with the length of a drought, as carry over supplies in reservoirs are depleted and water levels in groundwater basins decline (California DWR 2012).
The U.S. Drought Monitor is an accepted and widely used site for obtaining and summarizing drought information, as it integrates data from several other sources including the Palmer Drought Index, Soil Moisture Models, U.S. Geological Survey Weekly Stream Flows, Standardized Precipitation Index, and the Satellite Vegetation Health Index. It includes drought intensity categories for measuring dry conditions across counties, states, and regions of the U.S., so that drought can be quantified. These categories range from "abnormally dry" to "exceptional drought." The following figures provide "snapshots in time" of the drought conditions in California as of August 2015 (during the period of the last multi-year drought in Merced County and the state, from 2012- 2017) and March 30, 2021. The snapshots selected are instrumental in depicting both the historic and potential change in drought's geographic range and severity in the County (circled in blue).
Note: The Drought Monitor maps integrate data from several sources including the Palmer Drought Index, Soil Moisture Models, U.S. Geological Survey Weekly Stream flows, Standardized Precipitation Index, and Satellite Vegetation Health Index. The drought status in California is noted on the following graphic from the National Drought Mitigation Center.
2021-2026 Update Page 4 -37
284
Figure 4-5
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan U.S. Drought Monitor for California: August 4, 2015
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Intensity:
D None
DO Abnormally Ory
[=] 01 Moderate Drought
D2 Severe Drought
- 03 Extreme Drought
- 04 Exceptional Drought
The Drought Monitor focuses on broad-scale
conditions. Local conditions may vary. For mora
ii formation on the Drought Monitor, go to
!lttps.1/droughtmonitor.unl.edu/About.aspx
Author:
Eric Luebehusen
u .S Department of Agne ulture
U .. OA
:iiiiiii
droughtmonitor.unl .edu
2021-2026 Update Page 4-38
285
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 4-6 U.S. Drought Monitor for California: March 30, 2021 Past Occurrences
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Intensity:
D None
00 Abnormally Dry
D D1 Mooerate Drought
02 Severe Drougit
03 Extreme Drought
- D4 Exceptional Drought
The Drought Monitor foruseso.n IYoad-scale
oondilions. Local conditions may vary. Form 0111
i'lformation_ on fhe Drought Monitor, go ID
https:l/droughtmon.itor.11nl.edu/Aboo-f.a$f>X
Author:
Brad Pugh
CPC/NOAA
USDA iiiiliiii :
droughtmonitor.unl.edu
Historically, California has experienced severe drought conditions. The state's available record for determining hydrologic risks is short, only going back about 100 years. Recent droughts affecting Merced County are summarized below using data from Cal OES and from the County Agricultural Commissioner's Office.
• 1928-1937-This drought affected the entire state and is the longest, most severe drought on record with a recurrence interval of greater than 100 years.
• 1947-1950-Drought affected the entire state but was most extreme in Southern California. The drought in winter of 1950 affected the area from the Kern River basin north to the American River basin. The drought caused two deaths and $33 million in damages. • 1976-1977-The drought of 1976-1977 was most severe in the northern three-quarters of California, but the impact was experienced statewide because of the dependence of Southern California on water transfers from the north. The water year 1977 was the driest year of record at almost all gauging stations in the affected area in California, and the water year 1976 was among the five driest in the central and northern Sierra Nevada. The two-year deficiency in runoff accumulated during the drought is unequalled at gauging stations in the affected area; and this deficiency has a recurrence interval that exceeds 80 years. Crop damages statewide were $2.67 billion. • 1987-1992-California experienced a serious drought due to low precipitation and runoff levels.
During this multi-year, multi-county drought, the runoff from the San Joaquin Valley was 47 percent of average. In 1991, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Report Agricultural Outlook reported that the Merced River flow would be inadequate to provide sufficient water for 2021-2026 Update Page 4-39
286
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
agricultural uses for the fifth consecutive year. A U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) drought disaster declaration was declared.
• 2004-2005-On January 15, 2005, the USDA designated 53 of California's 58 counties as natural disaster areas due to damages and losses caused by extreme drought. • 2008-2009-0n June 12, 2008, the Governor proclaimed Merced County as a state disaster area due to the Central Valley Drought.
• 2012 - 2017-ln September 2012, the USDA designated Merced County a contiguous disaster area due to drought that occurred since January 1, 2012. In January 2014, the Governor proclaimed a State of Emergency and directed state officials to take all necessary actions to prepare for these drought conditions: to assist farmers and communities that are economically impacted by dry conditions and to ensure the state can respond if Californians face drinking water shortages. The Governor also directed state agencies to use less water and hire more firefighters and initiated an expansive water conservation public awareness campaign. Drought produced severe impacts to water wells throughout the planning area, with a high number of wells running dry. Land subsidence due to increased groundwater pumping also occurred in areas of the San Joaquin Valley. Crop damage was widespread as well. Water allotments were drastically reduced in many towns and water agencies, with extremely high costs for procuring water. In addition, job loss occurred with many families requiring food supply assistance, and water supply assistance provided to homeowners with dry wells.
According to a report released by UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, the 2014 California drought cost the state's agriculture industry about $1 billion in lost revenue, with a total statewide economic cost of the drought calculated to be $2.2 billion. The 2014 drought, the report says, is responsible for the greatest water loss ever seen in California agriculture - about one-third less than normal. The report calls the groundwater situation in California "a slow-moving train wreck." (NCICS 2019). According to the 2018 State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan, by the time the drought was declared officially in 2017, the state been declared a federal disaster area and had expended $6.6 billion in drought response and mitigation programs.
As shown in Table 4-4, of the 18 total Secretary of Agricultural Disaster Designations for Merced County in the past 8 years, 15 were specific to drought. In addition to the USDA designations there have also been two federal disaster declarations due to drought in the county (Refer to Table 4-3).
The National Drought Mitigation Center developed the Drought Impact Reporter in response to the need for a national drought impact database for the United States. Information comes from a variety of sources:
online, drought-related news stories and scientific publications, members of the public who visit the website and submit a drought-related impact for their region, members of the media, and members of relevant government agencies. The database is being populated beginning with the most recent impacts and working backward in time. The Drought Impact Reporter contains information on 195 impacts from droughts that affected Merced County between 2000 and 2020. Most of the impacts (113) were classified as "water supply and quality" and "relief, response and restrictions" (101). Other impacts included "agriculture" (79), "society and public health" (72), "plants and wildlife" (23), "fire" (16), "business and industry" (13), "tourism and recreation" (7) and "energy" (6). These categories are described as follows:
• Water Supply and Quality (113) -Drought effects associated with water supply and water quality include dry wells, voluntary and mandatory water restrictions, changes in water rates, increasing of water restrictions, increases in requests for new well permits, changes in water use due to water restrictions, greater water demand, decreases in water allocation or allotments, installation or alteration of water pumps or water intakes, changes to allowable water contaminants, water line damage or repairs due to drought stress, drinking water turbidity, change in water color or odor, declaration of drought watches or warnings, and mitigation activities. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-40
287
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• Relief, Response, and Restrictions (101) -This category refers to drought effects associated with disaster declarations, aid programs, requests for disaster declaration or aid, water restrictions, or fire restrictions. Examples include disaster declarations, aid programs, USDA Secretarial disaster declarations, Small Business Association disaster declarations, government relief and response programs, state level water shortage or water emergency declarations, county-level declarations, a declared "State of Emergency," requests for declarations or aid, nonprofit organization based relief, water restrictions, fire restrictions, National Weather Service (NWS) Red Flag Warnings, and declaration of drought watches or warnings.
• Agriculture (79) -Drought effects associated with agriculture, farming, aquaculture, horticulture, forestry, or ranching. Examples of drought-induced agricultural impacts include damage to crop quality; income loss for farmers due to reduced crop yields; reduced productivity of cropland; insect infestation; plant disease; increased irrigation costs; cost of new or supplemental water resource development (wells, dams, pipelines) for agriculture; reduced productivity of rangeland; forced reduction of foundation stock; closure/limitation of public lands to grazing; high cost or unavailability of water for livestock, Christmas tree farms, forestry, raising domesticated horses, bees, fish, shellfish, or horticulture.
• Society and Public Health (72) -Drought effects associated with human, public and social health include: health-related problems related to reduced water quantity or quality, such as increased concentration of contaminants; loss of human life (e.g., from heat stress, suicide); increased respiratory ailments; increased disease caused by wildlife concentrations; increased human disease caused by changes in insect carrier populations; population migration (rural to urban areas, migrants into the United States); loss of aesthetic values; change in daily activities (non-recreational, like putting a bucket in the shower to catch water); elevated stress levels; meetings to discuss drought; communities creating drought plans; lawmakers altering penalties for violation of water restrictions; demand for higher water rates; cultural/historical discoveries from low water levels; cancellation of fundraising events; cancellation/alteration of festivals or holiday traditions; stockpiling water; public service announcements and drought information websites; protests; and conflicts within the community due to competition for water.
• Plants and Wildlife (23)-Drought effects associated with unmanaged plants and wildlife, both aquatic and terrestrial, include: loss of biodiversity of plants or wildlife; loss of trees from rural or urban landscapes, shelterbelts, or wooded conservation areas; reduction and degradation of fish and wildlife habitat; lack of feed and drinking water; greater mortality due to increased contact with agricultural producers (as predators seek food from farms and producers are less tolerant of the intrusion); disease; increased vulnerability to predation (from species concentrated near water); migration and concentration (loss of wildlife in some areas and too much wildlife in others); increased stress on endangered species; salinity levels affecting wildlife; wildlife encroaching into urban areas; and loss of wetlands.
• Fire (16)-Drought often contributes to forest, range, rural, or urban fires, fire danger, and burning restrictions. Specific impacts include enacting or increasing burning restrictions, fireworks bans, increased fire risk, occurrence of fire (number of acres burned, number of wildfires compared to average, people displaced, etc.), state of emergency during periods of high fire danger, closure of roads or land due to fire occurrence or risk, and expenses to state and county governments of paying firefighters overtime and paying equipment (helicopter) costs. • Business and Industry (13) -This category tracks drought's effects on non-agriculture and nontourism businesses, such as lawn care, recreational vehicles, or gear dealers, and plant nurseries.
Typical impacts include reduction or loss of demand for goods or services, reduction in employment, variation in number of calls for service, late opening or early closure for the season, bankruptcy, permanent store closure, and other economic impacts.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-41
288
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• Tourism and Recreation (7) -Drought effects associated with recreational activities and tourism include closure of state hiking trails and hunting areas due to fire danger; water access or navigation problems for recreation; bans on recreational activities; reduced license, permit, or ticket sales (e.g., hunting, fishing, ski lifts, etc.); losses related to curtailed activities (e.g., bird watching, hunting and fishing, boating, etc.); reduced park visitation; and cancellation or postponement of sporting events. • Energy (6)-This category concerns drought's effects on power production, rates and revenue.
Examples include production changes for both hydropower and non-hydropower providers, changes in electricity rates, revenue shortfalls and/or windfall profits, and purchase of electricity when hydropower generation is down.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Likely- Historical drought data for the County planning area and the San Joaquin Valley region indicate there have been five significant multi-year droughts in the last 91 years. This equates to a multi-year drought every 18 years on average, or a 5 percent chance of a drought in any given year. Based on this data, droughts will likely affect the planning area. Given the historical occurrence of severe drought impacts throughout Merced County and across the state, the HMPC understands that drought will continue to pose a high degree of risk to the entire planning area, potentially impacting crops, livestock, water resources, the natural environment at large, buildings and infrastructure (from cascading or compound hazards), and local economies.
In addition, although drought affects the entire planning equally, the potential impacts may be variable and specific to each jurisdiction, depending on contextual factors such as the degree of assets and activities historically impacted by drought within each jurisdiction, such as the agricultural and parks and tourism industries.
Climate Change Considerations
Water resources in California area already experiencing stresses related to population growth, increased water demand, poor water quality, groundwater overdraft, and aging infrastructure. Scientific studies prepared for various California climate assessments and adaptations strategies also already show that drought conditions in California are likely to become more frequent and persistent over the next century due to climate change. Temperatures are warming, heat waves are more frequent, and precipitation has become increasingly variable (California Natural Resources Agency 2018a). According to California's Climate Adaptation Strategy, also referred to as "Safeguarding California Plan: 2018 Update", climate change is likely to significantly diminish California's future water supply. As a result, the state must change its water management, as climate change will create greater competition for limited water supplies (California Natural Resources Agency 2018b). The recent drought conditions over the past decade underscore the need to examine water supply and distribution management, conservation, and use policies. California and the San Joaquin Valley region have experienced a succession of dry spells and with warmer temperatures and periodic droughts that frequently contribute to water shortages in the region.
Climate change projections of extreme prolonged droughts will exacerbate the San Joaquin Valley's existing water supply challenges. In an average year, approximately 40 percent of the state's total water supply comes from groundwater, and during a dry year this increases to more than half of the state's water supply, with groundwater acting as a critical buffer against the impacts of drought and climate change (California Natural Resources Agency 2018).
202 1-2026 Update Page 4-42
289
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-22 Summary of Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources Resource Type of Description Impact
Soil Moisture Direct Prolonged dry seasons can lead to decreases in soil moisture; drier veoetation
Vegetation Indirect Longer and more intense fire season with increased extent of area burned
Stream Conditions Direct Increases in water temperature; potential effects on fish
Snowpack Indirect Increases in temperature will lead to decreases in snowpack
Warmer temperatures are likely to lead to a shift in
Runoff Direct peak runoff from spring to winter and a likely decrease in summer baseflow
Decreased summer flows resulting from earlier
Hydro power Indirect snowmelt and a shift in peak runoff could affect hydropower qeneration durinq summer months
Warmer winter temperatures will result in a greater
Precipitation Direct percentage of precipitation falling as rain rather than as snow
Reduction in snowpack and extended periods of
Groundwater Indirect drought are likely to increase dependency on qroundwater
Source: http:/ /frap.fire.ca.gov/data/assessment2010/pdfs/3.1 water.pdf p. 140 Vulnerability Assessment
All of Merced County is vulnerable to drought. Drought is one of the few hazards with the potential to impact all the citizens of the county through water restrictions, economic losses, and increased energy costs. The urbanized areas of the county and the agriculture industry are most likely to experience hardships associated with reduced water supply.
Impacts include water restrictions associated with domestic supplies, agricultural and livestock losses and economic impacts, hydroelectric power reductions, and increased costs for water. Secondary effects include susceptibility to wildfires and increased groundwater pumping that can contribute to land subsidence problems and degraded water quality.
General Property
Based on the USDA's Risk Management Agency (RMA) Crop Indemnity Reports, which were collected for the years 2007 -2020, crop losses due to drought were only reported between 2007 and 2014 across the county. Table 4-22 summarizes the agricultural losses experienced across the county communities. A total of $885,477 was indemnified for 14,660 acres of insured crops.
Table 4-23
Year
2007
Crops Loss Due to Drought, Risk Management Agency Crop Indemnity Reports, 2007-2020
Net Indemnity Crop Determined
Acres Amount
Wheat 301.9 $16,130
Oats 228.3 $1,241
Barley 1,345.9 $32,857
2021-2026 Update Page 4-43
290
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Net Indemnity Year Crop Determined
Acres Amount
Total 1,876 $50,228
Wheat 683.2 $75,727
2008 Oats 1,376.3 $34,192
Barley 960.9 $45,245
Total 3,020 $155,164
Wheat 2,179.4 $280,639
2009 Oats 882.7 $32,334
Barley 1,534.2 $74,455
Total 4,596 $387,428
2010
Wheat 860.2 $5,599
Total 860.2 $5,559
2011
Wheat 170 $22,806
Total 170 $22,806
Wheat 1,910.3 $167,880
2012 Oats 1,482 $56,827
Total 3,392 $224,707
Wheat 243.9 $8,907
2013 Oats 35 $633
Total 279 $9,540
Wheat 313.9 $26,623
2014 Oats 151.4 $3,382
Total 465 $30,005
Grand Total 14,660 $885,477
Source: USDA RMA Crop Indemnity Reports, 2007-2020
People
According to this California DOF the 2020 County population was 283,521 people. The County's population is projected to continue to increase by 1 percent to 1.48 percent annually until 2060 (CBPR 2016). This projected population growth would add additional strain to the surface water supplies and already depleted groundwater supplies but through the County Groundwater ordinance which prohibits the unstainable extraction or conveyance may help with reducing the impacts on drought on the regional groundwater supply.
The historical and potential impacts of drought on populations include agricultural sector job loss, secondary economic losses to local businesses and public recreational resources, increased cost to local and state government for large-scale water acquisition and delivery, and water rationing and water wells running dry for individuals and families. As drought is often accompanied by prolonged periods of extreme heat, negative health impacts such as dehydration can also occur, where children and elderly are most susceptible. Air quality often declines in times of drought which can affect those with respiratory ailments.
Critical Facilities
Drought impacts to critical facilities include water shortfalls for facility operations and critical functions, and potential structural destabilization and damage resulting from land subsidence. Refer to the section on Subsidence for more information.
20:1-2026 Update Page 4-44
291
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Economy
Drought impacts to the local or regional economy can be difficult to quantify but can be extensive and long-lasting depending on the circumstances during, and after a severe drought event. If water resources are limited, effects would be more severe for industries that rely on large amounts of water and any prolonged drought would intensify these impacts. Sectors critical to the economy such as commerce, distribution, agriculture, tourism, related environmental resources, municipal and industrial water supply, key city assets, energy generation, and even socioeconomic aspects can be affected due to lack of, or even reduced quality of water resources.
Agriculture in the San Joaquin Valley relies on artificial irrigation using mostly imported water and/or groundwater. Local droughts are expected and accommodated for; however, a prolonged statewide drought could exceed local capabilities to handle reductions of imported surface water supplies and potentially lead to reductions in distribution from local water storage districts.
The costs of drought are difficult to quantify because the impacts affect so many different sectors including wildlife and natural resources, business and industry, tourism and recreation, agriculture, and individual households. Agriculture often suffers the most financial losses from drought and is the major component of the Merced County economy. For example, according to the California Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program's 2020 Report and 2020 Recommendations, the 2014-2017 multi-year drought was estimated to cost over $6.6 billion once it was over and the loss of 5,000 jobs in 2016 (QPR 2020).
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
The Merced National Wildlife Refuge encompasses over 10,000 acres of wetlands, native grasslands, vernal pools and riparian areas and is home to various bird species and other wildlife including the largest wintering population of lesser Sandhill cranes and Ross' geese, and both species are vulnerable to drought. The impacts of drought on vegetation and wildlife can include death from dehydration and spread of invasive species or disease because of stressed conditions, loss of biodiversity, loss of trees in rural and urban landscapes, loss of wetlands, and degradation of habitat.
In general, environmental impacts from drought are more likely at the interface of the human and natural world. The loss of crops or livestock due to drought can have far reaching economic effects on communities, wind and water erosion can alter the visual landscape, and dust can damage property.
Water-based recreational resources are also heavily affected by drought conditions. Indirect impacts from drought arise from increased wildfire risk and greater occurrence of fire.
Future Development
With the County's population projected to continue to grow while climate change projections are showing an increased duration an intensity of drought events for the San Joaquin Valley, it will be important for each new development application to be reviewed with existing and future water supplies in mind.
Because future development encompasses all forms of property, buildings, infrastructure, critical facilities and all related populations and their functions, drought impacts to future development align with the historical and potential impacts to populations, property, natural environment, and critical facilities discussed (above).
Risk Summary
• Due to the widespread impacts in San Joaquin Valley, it can have, drought is considered a High significance hazard.
• There have been five multi-year droughts in the past 91 years. Most recent drought lasted from 2012 to 2017 and resulted in a declared State of Emergency.
2021-2026 Upaate Page 4-45
292
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• 15 USDA Disaster Designations due to drought have been made in the last 8 years. • 195 reports of impacts related to drought were made within Merced County between, 2000 and 2020. • Between 2007-2014 a total of $885,477 crop indemnity claims was paid due to crop losses for a total of 14,660 acres due to drought impacts.
• Climate change projections show that extreme prolonged drought is likely to continue and will exacerbate existing water supply challenges.
• Related Hazards: Extreme Heat, Wildfire, Subsidence, Agricultural Pest Infestation and Disease Table 4-24 Hazard Risk Summary - Drought
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Extensive Likely Limited Medium
City of Dos Palos Extensive Likely Limited Medium
City of Gustine Extensive Likely Limited Medium
City of Livingston Extensive Likely Limited Medium
City of Los Banos Extensive Likely Limited Medium
City of Merced Extensive Likely Negligible Low
Z02 1-2026 Update Page 4-46
293
4.2.3 Earthquake
Hazard/Problem Definition
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
An earthquake is caused by a sudden slip on a fault. Stresses in the earth's outer layer push the sides of the fault together. Stress builds up and the rocks slip suddenly, releasing energy in waves that travel through the earth's crust and cause the shaking that is felt during an earthquake. The amount of energy released during an earthquake is usually expressed as a magnitude and is measured directly from the earthquake as recorded on seismographs. The magnitude of earthquakes is usually measured using the Richter scale; a logarithmic scale calculated from the amplitude of the largest seismic wave recorded for the earthquake.
Another measure of earthquake severity is intensity. Intensity is an expression of the amount of shaking at any given location on the ground surface. Seismic shaking is typically the greatest cause of damage to structures during earthquakes. Seismologists have developed the Mercalli scale to quantify the shaking intensity of an earthquake's effects, which is measured by how an earthquake is felt by humans and the damage to buildings.
Earthquakes can cause structural damage, injury, and loss of life, as well as damage to infrastructure networks such as water, power, gas, communication, and transportation lines. Other damage-causing effects of earthquakes are surface rupture, fissuring, settlement, and permanent horizontal and vertical shifting of the ground. Secondary impacts can include landslides, seiches, liquefaction, and dam failure.
Liquefaction occurs when ground shaking causes the mechanical properties of some fine grained, saturated soils to liquefy and act as a fluid (liquefaction). It is the result of a sudden loss of soil strength due to a rapid increase in soil pore water pressures caused by ground shaking, in areas of shallow groundwater (within 1 O' of surface or less). Liquefaction that produces surface effects generally occurs in the upper 40 to 50 feet of the soil column, although the phenomenon can occur deeper than 100 feet.
The duration of ground shaking is also an important factor in causing liquefaction to occur. The larger the earthquake magnitude, and the longer the duration of strong ground shaking, the greater the potential there is for liquefaction to occur.
In populated areas, the greatest potential for loss of life and property damage can come as a result of ground shaking from a nearby earthquake. The degree of damage depends on many interrelated factors.
Among these are the moment magnitude, focal depth, distance from the causative fault, duration of shaking, type of surface deposits or bedrock, presence of high ground water, topography, and finally, the design, type, and quality of building construction.
Geographic Area
The nearest faults of major significance are the San Andreas to the west of Merced County, a distance of approximately 15 miles from the county line; the Hayward and Calaveras faults to the northwest; the White Wolf, Garlock, and Sierra Nevada faults to the south; and the Bear Mountain Fault Zone about 5 miles east of and parallel to the eastern border of Merced County. These faults have been and will continue to be the principal source of seismic activity affecting the County of Merced.
The only fault known inside the County is the "Ortigalita", also known as the "Telsa-Ortigalita Fault", located in the western quarter of the County, dissecting the Coast Range in a northwesterly direction. This fault has not been active in historic times, however, there is no guarantee that it will never become active again.
There have been no records of major seismic activity originating in the county, with most epicenters in the county being below a magnitude 4.0. However, the county has been shaken by earthquakes originating elsewhere. There is documented evidence of six earthquakes that shook the area, those of 1872, 1906, 2021 2026 Update Page 4-47
294
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
1952, 1966, 1984, and 1989. Major damage occurred in Los Banos in 1906, with minor damage recorded throughout the county from other occurrences.
The San Andreas Fault occurs where the North American and Pacific plates come together and grind in a side-by-side motion relative to each other. Another large known fault, the White Wolf fault, is located to the south near Arvin and Bakersfield in Kern County and produced a severe M 7.7 earthquake in 1952.
Figure 4-7 below shows the known faults and potential for ground shaking resulting from earthquakes in and near Merced County, based on USGS probabilistic ground shaking with a 2% in SO-year occurrence (AKA 2500-year probabilistic ground shaking).
Figure 4-7 Merced County Earthquake Ground Shaking Potential and Nearby Faults Sl tlNISI.A\JS
/
• Li>(lngslon
•f) '4 ~
Atw ,ttr ch:_ ~d Probability of Shaking 2% in 50 Years
Spectral Acelleration @ 1 Sec Freq.
Map compiled 3;2021 :
Wood Intended for planning purposes only. . .. Data Sour«: Merced County, CA Parks and Rec USGS, HFLO
o s 10t.1i:es
u..u..l.J.u..J
180-215% g
160- 180% g
140- 160% g
120 • 140% g
100 -120% g
90-100% g
80-90%g
70-80%g
60 - 70%g
50 - 60%9
40-50%9
30-40%g
20-30% g
10· 20% g
5 - 10%g
"
Earthquakes can occur at any time of the day or night and any time of the year. Earthquakes are particularly dangerous due to their rapid onset, generally without warning. Aftershocks can occur for days, weeks, and even months following a major earthquake. This additional damage to structures already weakened by the main earthquake increases the danger to rescue and recovery personnel.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
For extent, the severity of an earthquake, or the amount of energy released during an earthquake is usually expressed in terms of intensity or magnitude as described further below.
Intensity: Intensity represents the observed effects of ground shaking at any specified location and earthquake shaking decreases with distance from the earthquake epicenter. Intensity is an expression of the amount of shaking at any given location on the ground surface based on felt or observed effects. 202 l-2026 Update Page 4-48
295
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Seismic shaking is typically the greatest cause of losses to structures during earthquakes. Intensity is measured with the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale. The intensity of ground shaking at a particular site or structure is a function of many factors including: 1) earthquake magnitude, 2) distance from the epicenter, 3) duration of strong ground motion, 4) local geologic conditions (soil type and topography), and 5) the fundamental period of the structure. A brief description of those factors is presented below.
The Modified Mercal.li Intensity scale is summarized in Table 4-24, along with the effects associated with the MMI scale. Damage typically occurs in MMI of scale VII or above.
Earthquake Magnitude: Magnitude represents the amount of seismic energy released at the hypocenter of an earthquake. It is based on the amplitude of the earthquake waves recorded. Seismologists have developed several magnitude scales; one of the first was the Richter Scale, developed in 1932 by the late Dr. Charles F. Richter of the California Institute of Technology. The Richter scale is numeric and has a logarithmic relationship between scale factors, so that a difference of one scale number represents a tenfold increase in measured amplitude, which in turn corresponds to an approximate 31x energy release difference when compared to the next whole number value. The Moment Magnitude scale (Mw, or M), which is a measurement of energy released by the movement of a fault and is the modern method used by seismologists to measure earthquakes. Overall, as the amount of energy released by an earthquake increases, the potential for ground shaking impacts also increases.
Distance from Epicenter: Earthquake energy generally dissipates (or attenuates) with distance from a fault. Over long distances, this loss of energy can be significant, resulting in a significant decrease in ground shaking with increased distance from the epicenter.
Duration of Strong Shaking: The duration of the strong ground shaking constitutes a major role in determining the amount of structural damage and the potential for ground failure that can result from an earthquake. Larger magnitude earthquakes have longer durations than smaller earthquakes.
Local Geologic Conditions: The geologic and soil conditions at a particular site have the potential to substantially increase the effects of ground shaking. The thickness, density, and consistency of the soil, as well as shallow ground water levels, have the potential to amplify the effects of ground shaking depending on the characteristics of the earthquake. In general, the presence of unconsolidated soils above the bedrock surface can amplify the ground shaking caused by an earthquake.
Fundamental Periods: Every structure has its own fundamental period or natural vibration. If the vibration of ground shaking coincides with the natural vibration period of a structure, damage to the structure can be greatly increased. The extent of damage suffered during an earthquake can also depend on non-geologic factors. The type of building and its structural integrity will influence the severity of the damage suffered. Generally, small, well-constructed, one- and two-story wood and steel frame buildings have performed well in earthquakes because of their light weight and flexibility. Reinforced concrete structures will also usually perform well. Buildings constructed from non-flexible materials, such as unreinforced brick and concrete, hollow concrete block, clay tile, or adobe, are more vulnerable to earthquake damage.
Effects of Ground Shaking: The primary effect of ground shaking is the damage or destruction of buildings, infrastructure, and possible injury or loss of life. Building damage can range from minor cracking of plaster to total collapse. Disruption of infrastructure facilities can include damage to utilities, pipelines, roads, and bridges. Ruptured gas and water lines can result in fire and produce scour/inundation damage, respectively, to structures, as can fire from other causes, such as electrical damages. Secondary effects can include geologic impacts such as co-seismic fault movement along nearby faults, seismically induced slope instability, liquefaction, lateral spreading, and other forms of ground failure and seismic response. These secondary effects were demonstrated in Oceana by the San Simeon 2003 earthquake.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-49
296
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-25 Earthquake Magnitude and Intensity Measurements and Intensity Characteristics Magnitude
Mercalli
Intensity
Effects Frequency
Less than 2.0 I Microearthquakes, not felt or rarely felt; recorded by seismographs. Continual
2.0-2.9 I to II Felt slightly by some people; damages to buildings. Over 1M per year
3.0-3.9 II to IV Often felt by people; rarely causes damage; shaking of indoor objects Over 100,000 noticeable. per year
4.0-4.9 IV to VI Noticeable shaking of indoor objects and rattling noises; felt by most 10K to 15K people in the affected area; slightly felt outside; generally, no to per year minimal damage.
5.0-5.9 VI to VIII Can cause damage of varying severity to poorly constructed buildings; 1 K to 1,500 at most, none to slight damage to all other buildings. Felt by everyone. per year
6.0-6.9 VII to X Damage to a moderate number of well-built structures in populated 100 to 150 areas; earthquake-resistant structures survive with slight to moderate per year damage; poorly designed structures receive moderate to severe damage; felt in wider areas; up to hundreds of miles/kilometers from the epicenter; strong to violent shaking in epicentral area.
7.0-7.9 VIII< Causes damage to most buildings, some to partially or completely 10 to 20 per collapse or receive severe damage; well-designed structures are likely year to receive damage; felt across great distances with major damage mostly limited to 250 km from epicenter.
8.0-8.9 VIII< Major damage to buildings, structures likely to be destroyed; will cause One per year moderate to heavy damage to sturdy or earthquake-resistant buildings; damaging in large areas; felt in extremely large regions.
9.0 and VIII< At or near total destruction - severe damage or collapse to all One per 10- Greater buildings; heavy damage and shaking extends to distant locations; 50 years permanent changes in ground topography.
Source: USGS
Past Occurrences
There have not been any damaging earthquakes greater than M 6.0 recorded in Merced County in over 200 years and the County has not been included in any federal disaster declarations involving earthquakes, though several have been very close. The most recent large earthquake near Merced County was 16 miles east north-east of King City at a magnitude of 5.3 on October 20, 2012. Several aftershocks followed the main earthquake, including a 3.1 aftershock. This quake was preceded by two earthquakes located approximately 100 miles from Merced County, the 1982 New ldria earthquake (M 5.4) and the 1983 Coalinga (M 6.5). There was a low level of ground shaking reported.
Major earthquakes have occurred near Merced County and resulted in ground shaking felt in the county.
The Fort Tejon earthquake in 1857 of M 7.9 was one of the greatest earthquakes ever recorded in the United States and the largest in California. It left an extensive surface rupture scar over 215 miles in length along the San Andreas Fault. The epicenter is now thought to have been located near Cholame, approximately 134 miles southwest of the City of Merced. During the Fort Tejon earthquake, strong shaking lasted from one to three minutes. As a result of the shaking, the flow of the Kern River was turned upstream, and water ran four feet deep over its banks. The waters of Tulare Lake were thrown upon its shores, stranding fish miles from the original lakebed. Property loss was heavy at Fort Tejon, one of the only settlements at the time, an Army post in south-central Kern County about four miles from the San 21l21-2026 Update Page 4-50
297
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Andreas Fault. In 1857, two buildings were declared unsafe, three others were damaged extensively but were habitable, and still others sustained moderate damage. One person was killed in the collapse of an adobe house at Gorman.
Figure 4-8 below displays the common areas damaged by earthquakes based on historic evidence dating back to the year 1800. The occurrences are color-coded by damaging shaking intensity across the state of California, and Merced County is enclosed within a black circle. The figure shows that, per the MMI scale noting occurrences equal to or greater than an Intensity of VII, the county has experienced 1 to 3 earthquake events of this kind, mostly affecting the far western and southwestern portions of the County.
Figure 4-8 Areas Damaged by Earthquakes from 1800 to 2017 0 50 100 Miles
I I,, 1
1 I I
0 50 100 Kilomutcrs
Minimum Number of Occurrences of
Damaging Shaking Intensity (MMI >= VII)
8 7
6 5
4 I 3
2 1
Source: California State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2018; California Geologic Survey 2021-2026 Update Page 4-51
298
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Probability of Future Occurrences
It is estimated that major earthquakes (ranging from a magnitude of 7 to 7.9) occur in California one out of every 10 years. However, strong earthquakes (from magnitudes 6 to 6.9) strike the state about once every two to three years. A strong earthquake can cause major damage depending on the epicenter's location with regards to populated areas, and can lead to billions of dollars in disasters, deaths, injuries, and disruptions in services and communities' way of life. Moderate earthquakes (around magnitudes of
5.5) can occur three to four times a year in the state.
Along the San Andreas Fault, segments exist where no large earthquakes have occurred for long intervals of time. These areas accumulate potential energy and provide clues as to where the next earthquake may occur and when. Scientists term these segments "seismic gaps" and, in general, have been successful in forecasting the time when some of the seismic gaps will produce large earthquakes. Geologic studies show that over the past 1,400 to 1,500 years, large earthquakes have occurred at about 150-year intervals on the southern San Andreas Fault. As the last large earthquake on the southern San Andreas was the Fort Tejon earthquake in 1857, that section of the fault is considered a likely location for an earthquake within the next few decades (USGS 1997).
Based on the earthquake shaking potential mapped for Merced County, the proximity to the San Andreas Fault with a history of shaking, but no surface rupture, the probability of damaging seismic ground shaking in Merced County is occasional. The shaking levels expected with a 2% in 50 years probability are depicted in Figure 4-7.
Climate Change Considerations
Climate change is not expected to directly affect earthquake frequency or intensity.
Vulnerability Assessment
Earthquake loss estimation for the 2021 HMP update utilized FEMA's Hazus-MH 4.2 natural hazard loss estimation software. Hazus is a GIS based, standardized, nationally applicable multi-hazard loss estimation methodology and software. Local, state and federal government officials use Hazus for preparedness, emergency response, and mitigation planning. A level 1 Hazus analysis was performed which estimates damage based on an inventory database compiled at a national level aggregated to Census Tracts. As with any model there are uncertainties, and the results should be considered approximate for planning purposes.
To evaluate potential losses associated with earthquake activity in the planning area, a Hazus 2,500-year probabilistic scenario was run for Merced County. The 2,500-year scenario represents the level of shaking considers multiple faults in the region instead of a single scenario. The methodology utilizes probabilistic seismic hazard contour maps developed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for the 2018 update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps that are included with HAZUS-MH. The USGS maps provide estimates of potential ground acceleration and spectral acceleration at periods of 0.3 second and 1.0 second, respectively. The 2,500-year return period analyzes ground shaking estimates from the various seismic sources in the area with a 2 percent probability of being exceeded in 50 years. The International Building Code uses this level of ground shaking for building design in seismic areas.
Hazus estimates the number of people displaced, the number of buildings and facilities/infrastructure damaged, the number of casualties, and the damage to transportation systems and utilities. Results produced by Hazus are reported at the census tract level. Figure 4-9 below displays the Census Tracts within the county which were analyzed in this scenario, color-coded by the amount of total losses each tract experienced. The map is followed by the Hazus results broken up in respective sections. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-52
299
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-9 Hazus Earthquake Analysis for Merced County-Total Losses by Census Tract (in Thousands of Dollars)
STANISLAUS
i
'
SANTA CLARA
Map compiled 312021 ;
d intended for planning purposes only. WOO . Dale Source· Merced County, HaZU6 4 .2 General Property
FRESNO
0 5 10Mlles
f I I I I If If
U:11vers1ty
• Commumtv
.. Merced
Pl nad
Total Losses by Census Tract (millions)
S9.464 · $20,000
S20,001 · $35,000
S35-001 - $55,000
S55,001 • $100,000
S100,001 - $168,157
• Urban Communities
Deities
Unreinforced Masonry Building (URM)s: Unreinforced masonry building type structures consist of buildings made of unreinforced concrete and brick, hollow concrete blocks, clay tiles, and adobe. Buildings constructed of these materials are heavy and brittle, and typically provide little earthquake resistance. In small earthquakes, unreinforced buildings can crack, and in strong earthquakes, they have a tendency to collapse. These types of structures pose the greatest structural risk to life and safety of all general building types.
Per Hazus, there are an estimated 77,000 buildings in Merced County with a total building replacement value (excluding contents) of $24 Billion. Approximately 94% of these buildings (and 82% of the building value) are associated with residential housing. In terms of building construction types found in the region, wood frame construction makes up 87% of the building inventory. The remaining percentage is distributed between the other general building types.
The categories of damages defined by Hazus are:
Slight damage includes diagonal hairline fractures on most shear wall surfaces and hairline cracks on most infill walls.
Moderate damage includes cracks on most walls and failure of some shear walls. 2021 2026 Update Page 4-53
300
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Extensive damage means that most shear wall surfaces in the structure have reached or exceeded their capacity exhibited by large, through-the-wall diagonal cracks.
Complete damage means that the structure has collapsed or is in danger of collapse.
The building losses are broken into two categories: direct building losses and business interruption losses.
The direct building losses are the estimated costs to repair or replace the damage caused to the building and its contents. The business interruption losses are the losses associated with inability to operate a business because of the damage sustained during the earthquake. Business interruption losses also include the temporary living expenses for those people displaced from their homes because of the earthquake.
The total building-related losses were $2.4 billion. By far, the largest loss was sustained by the residential occupancies which made up over 61 % of the total loss. Figure 4-10 and Figure 4-11 below provide a summary of the losses associated with the building damage. -------- Figure 4-10 Earthquake Losses by Loss Type and Occupancy Type (in Millions of Dollars) EartrntUake looses by Loss Type ($ nilliooo)
■ C-ll)t;o.'..i;;H~d :::0.
e,~ ::, ...
"'""-;;,-.,,., ""'"'""•· !2 ""' ...
~·...:<:au,-, .,..,
ll~t:lf· 2'
.'.~ 131' ,~a,c- l"i
1'<:ts : 1!.\.~
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Earthquake Losses by Occupancy Type {$
miHions}
■ Sl'lg!e
Fam;fy
Olher
ResiC!e-n:r a!
■ C<imrr.ercia!
l~du strfal
■ Ottiers
2021-2026 Update Page 4-54
301
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-11 Hazus 2,500 Vear Probabilistic Earthquake Scenario Structure Damage by Occupancy Type
20.000
f..000
12.000
6000
0 ~ - ---.. - - --- - ·-
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
-
_._ _'I • - -
-
-
-
-
·.---
..._.:.s-;.(:-;.itt
<
■ Comple:e
E1tensrve
Moderate
■ Shgnt
Hazus estimates that about 17,106 buildings will be at least moderately damaged. This is over 22% of the total building stock in the county. There are an estimated 1,386 buildings that will be damaged beyond repair. Table 4-25 summarizes the expected damage by property occupancy type in more detail, whereas Table 4-26 contains the results of the expected building damage by building material type. --- Table 4-26 Expected Building Damage by Occupancy Class Nooe Slight ~te Extensive Complete
Count 11'11 Count 1'411 Count ('llr) Count f%1 Count 11/rl AgricultUfl! 226 SP 0 6P 1e1 .tt. 0.83 J~S.i5 1.27 71 02 2 19 34 20 2.47 Commeroial S37.i4 ::: 56 64H3 2.3! 11~.a~ "~ w-,(I 3tlE 78 11.27 151 63 1;: 94 Education 53 66 0 1P 42.22 0.1E 32 1l o.2e 1263 0,3g «.Di -~.2·;i Government ::,n1 0 10 :-:s 11 o.os 23-.Ji 0 IP 12 88 040 E 83 Q,4;; industrial ~78 P:l. 0 55 1-4 ea 0.::1 174,gt 1 .!Q 9:! 63 2 8t 39 80 ~.a-r Other ResidlHltiill 1 769 01 540 "77<!.91l e.4a 226-S.2S 1a 11 ·932 7g tQ.58 f14e 04 et. 3"' Religion 'OOH 0 31 7300 0 .. -,-, 6!..:?:, 0.52 3" ~ .,-~, 0 P9 12'10 on Singlehmily 2Q559 17 g3 :0 =◄ ~ -2.59 B9.4f l.l03l6S 1:!AZ 72.t4E 2:!.32 •~o ., 1:!7' Toul 32,769 27,392 12,474 3,2"5 1,387
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
2021-2026 Update Page 4-55
302
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-27 Expected Building Damage by Building Material (All Design Levels) I
I
I
I
I
I
Wood
Steel
Concrete
f7ecast
RM
URM
MH
Total
'Ni:,te:
RM
URM
MH
Non!!
Count (¾)
3'!934 P ~-40
2tlC7f !Hi:
305.90 0:c'!
225-.03 ,iJ'J
7R42 ;;:_3,
74.2;" 0,1~.
211:iH 0.64
32.769
Reido~ Masonry
Unre nfcrCEG Masonty
Marn..fae.'l:lred Housing
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Slight
COi.lilt
25683.22:
214.23.
23'~.69
18t ll
35E 11
a~.02·
8EZ:.34
27,392
Moderate Extensive
t'II) Count f%) Count (%}
c'3.76 ~mo~ 7544 73600 22.68
D.i'S 332.22 21!7 '94.40 ,H!9
0.$6 2'U'O 110 11820 3.84
0.66 240.98 Vit3 11lU!6 3.6i
1.30 401HIS s .. ze 20DS4 e rn
0.25 BU2 0,65 42\A 1.32
2.38 !791:US :4.35 1ss:t'd8 f6.51
12,474 3,245
Complete
Count (,.l
2CB.!5 l::.02
SZ.'r 6.02
53.2d 3.53
44&-c' 3.2~
e~ . til 3.69
~.{5 :uc
Qld.2-! s,u,o
1,387
Hazus also estimates the amount of debris that will be generated by the earthquake event analyzed. The model subdivides the debris into two general categories: a) Brick/Wood, and b) Reinforced Concrete/Steel. This distinction is made because of the different types of material handling equipment required to handle the debris.
The model estimates that a total of 442,000 tons of debris will be generated. Of that total amount, Brick/Wood comprises 38% of the debris, while the remainder would be Reinforced Concrete/Steel. If the debris tonnage was converted to estimates of truckloads required to remove it, debris generated would convert to about 17,680 truckloads, with each truckload carrying 25 tons. Figure 4-12 summarizes the debris generation estimate and material type for this earthquake event. --------------
Figure 4-12 Debris Generation in Millions of Tons and by Material Type Earthquake Debris jmiUions of tonsl
Book/Wood Total Debris
n . 21 G.44
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
• •-u··)tt,-
"!'ffli ">ot!"Jabw'A . '9:,,.,':JII,_! .....
Truck Load
2021-2026 Update Page 4-56
303
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
People
Shelter Requirement: Hazus estimates the number of households that are expected to be displaced from their homes due to the earthquake and the number of displaced people that will require accommodations in temporary public shelters. The model estimates 918 households to be displaced due to the earthquake.
Of these, approximately 882 people (out of a total population of 255,793) will seek temporary shelter in public shelters.
Casualties: Ground movement during an earthquake is seldom the direct cause of death or injury. Most earthquake-related injuries result from collapsing walls, flying glass, and falling objects as a result of the ground shaking, or people trying to move more than a few feet during the shaking. Hazus estimates the number of people that will be injured and killed by the earthquake. The casualties are broken down into four severity levels that describe the extent of the injuries. The levels are described as follows:
Severity Level 1: Injuries will require medical attention, but hospitalization is not needed.
Severity Level 2: Injuries will require hospitalization but are not considered life-threatening.
Severity Level 3: Injuries will require hospitalization and can become life-threatening if not promptly treated.
Severity Level 4: Victims are killed by the earthquake.
The casualty estimates are provided for three times of day: 2:00 AM, 2:00 PM and 5:00 PM. These times represent the periods of the day that different sectors of the community are at their peak occupancy loads. The 2:00 AM estimate considers that the residential occupancy load is at its maximum. The 2:00 PM estimate considers that the educational, commercial and industrial sector loads are at their maximum, and has the highest numbers of casualties estimated. The 5:00 PM represents peak commute time. These estimates of casualties are broken down in Table 4-27.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-57
304
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-28 Hazus Earthquake Casualty Estimates from Merced County 2 AM Ccmmercral
Commuting
Ed1,;c.afonal
In dustrial
Other-Res,dent1a•
Si11gh~ Farrily
2 PM Comrrerc:11!
Coml'l'utng
He.tels
Industrial
Ot1'ter-Resident:al
Single Family
TOtll
S PM Comrr.ereial
Ccmmuting
• riotets
lnciust!iaJ
Other-Resident1a.
Sin;iie Fam,I)'
TOtll
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Social Vulnerability
Lflffl1
6 .. 81
0.10 0 .0:l
0.0::l
14.37 21f'.B.2 ,
186.82
408
43!,3-3
084
248.75
IH!J
HJ5.82
48.0S
38.13 873
3-23.34
13.fB
1~i.~7
!) C!l
56.14 1-J.71
53.91 566
Lnel2 i.evel3 Leffi 4
.St 0.2a 055
0.13 023 004
Y.0:J 000 ilOO
l?.01 I (LOO 0.00
3.78 058 '.11
47 .S1 I 3.89 6.95
21.l'. 0{!7 1 iO
74 s 10
114 03 1757 ,?A~g
ue 2,08 040
!]f,.{I~ 10.46 2047
0.0·:l 0.00 000
27.7G 4.15 808
l!l.4:t OBS u;g
4.91 02fl o.ia
224 35 65
e:-.2 13.H 25.411
1tl.eZ 30.12 5]5
f..0~ G.SO U-'6
0.03 G.llG 000
17.3.i 2,59 5 05
17.3-'3 1.46 2 59
i .2l 0.44 0~6
150 49 41
Populations most vulnerable to earthquake and liquefaction activity would be those that rely on specific services or electrical power, which may not be available during or after a quake, or those which are homeless, would have a difficult time evacuating due to age or disability, cannot communicate easily due to speaking English less than well, for example.
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Critical Facility Inventory: Hazus breaks critical facilities into two groups: essential facilities and high potential loss facilities. Essential facilities include hospitals, medical clinics, schools, fire stations, police 2021-2026 Update Page 4-58
305
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
stations and emergency operations facilities. High potential loss facilities include dams, levees, military installations, nuclear power plants and hazardous material sites.
Essential Facility Damage: There are four (4) hospitals in the region with a total bed capacity of 246 beds. There are 145 schools, 31 fire stations, 14 police stations and one (1) emergency operation facility.
The inventory also includes 23 hazardous material sites.
On the day of the earthquake, the model estimates that only 125 hospital beds (51 %) are available for use by patients already in the hospital and those injured by the earthquake. After one week, 75% of the beds will be back in service. By 30 days, 94% will be operational. The essential facility inventory and expected damages from the earthquake event are provided in Table 4-28.
Transportation Systems Inventory: Within Hazus, the lifeline inventory is divided between transportation and utility lifeline systems. There are seven (7) transportation systems that include highways, railways, light rail, bus, ports, ferry and airports. There are six (6) utility systems that include potable water, wastewater, natural gas, crude & refined oil, electric power and communications. The transportation systems inventory and expected damages from the earthquake, in terms of number of structures and locations affected, are provided in Table 4-29, while losses in millions of dollars are summarized in Table 4-30. The total value of the lifeline inventory is over $9.4 billion. This inventory includes over 274 miles of highways, 532 bridges, and 11,935 miles of pipes.
Utility Lifeline Systems Inventory: The replacement value of the transportation and utility lifeline systems is estimated to be $4.48 billion and $4.97 billion, respectively. The expected utility system facility damages in terms of total structures or systems affected, along with the inventory of this dataset, are summarized in Table 4-31. Economic losses in millions of dollars are found in Table 4-32. Site specific expected utility system pipeline damages (including their inventory) are included in Table 4-33, while the potable water and electric power system performance limitations, damages, and inventory will be in Table 4-34.
Table 4-29 Essential Facility Inventory and Expected Damage # Facilities
CLass1ficauo Total At. Least ~oderate Comp ~te
Oamage>50~ Oamage ~
Hospitals 4 0
I Sc .ools ·45 -," 0
I EOCs 0 0
.Pol eeStations • J
.. 2 0
fireStations !, 1 .. 0
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
With Func.1:ionalit-J
j, 50° tffl day 1
S4
...
'
t 7
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-59
306
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-30 Transportation Systems Inventory and Expected Damage by Number of Locations Numb«ofl~---------- System Component locations/, With at least With Complete With Func&oality > 50 ~ Segments Mod. Damage Dama{llec Mer0ay1 After0ay7
H~trway Segments 124 0 0 124 •24
Bridges f32 en 16 454 486
Tu, nels 0 !! 0 o, 0
Railwa:rs S"gments lflS {! J 168 tes
Bridges 64 G ';) 64 64
Tunnels 0 0 !l Oi 0
Facilities 2 0 0 2 2
UglrtRail Segments C C 0 0 c,
Bridges C, 11 a ::J C
Tunnll,'S C, C 0 0 0
Facilities 0 C 0 0 0
Sus Facilities 3 ::I 2 3
Ferry Facff:t,es 0 C 0 :) C
Port Facilities 0 0 0 0 a
Airport Fa1lilitie; 5 2 :J 4 f
Runways 5 0 a 5 5
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
2:02 1-2026 Update Page 4-60
307
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
-------- -- - Table 4-31 Transportation System Economic Losses in Millions of Dollars System
High~y
Raitw.iys
Light Rail
f erry
Pon
Airport
Component
Segm$\::S
Bridges
Tu .. ,ne,s
Su~ptal
Segme:its
Bridges
, u,.,ne!s
Fa:ititi&s
Su Olill
S~men,;s
B!idgH
Tunnels
Facilities
~UO':OUI
Faclhbes
Su otal
Faci11 ties
$ut>tCl31
Faci'•bl!S
3ut:,tot:1l
Faci ties
Runways
Sc., G
Tob
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
lnYl!ntory Valu• Economic loss Loss Ratio ri.t
23C5.e784 O.OOOJ O. C'.J
W2.Qi43 &-4.70211 "·73
0.0000 C.JODJ 0.0-J
3338.7527 94.7029
35w.~·631 C.JOCJ O.CJ
366. ~ 241 IS.5N4 e-07
C.OOOJ C..JOC{) 0 CJ
5.a2eQ 1 411il 2e.s 1
731.0132 19.9863
O.!lOCO C-.OOCiD O.C:J
0.000:J O.JOCO O.C.J
C.OOCJ O.OOOJ O.C.J
O.JOC:J O.JOCO O.CJ
0.0000 0.0000
f .4"18 Ul346 35 23
5.-4918 1.9346
C.!lOO:l o.ooco O.Cl
0.0000 0.0000
O.JOCJ 0.00CJ 0 00
0.0000 0.0000
4e.lif,43 14.7320 32.03
3!:16 .~8C7 C.OOOJ 0 00
402.9550 14.7320
4,478.21 131.36
2021-2026 Update Page 4-61
308
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-32 Expected Utility System Facility Inventory and Damages ,
System
Potab~e Water
Waste Water
Natural Gas
Oil Systems
Etectrfoal Power
Commun1cation
Pota'b~ Water
Waste Water
NaturalGas
Ojf Systems
Communication
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Total#
Component
:J-t!rblt'.>::ir, i.. 1e&
-=-acn!Ues
f<lcilltk:S
?lpelires
i";JCll!U&S
=>~l!nes
Facm~s
::i1~1irres
With at least
Mode~te Damage
0 14
lb
'I Locations I
Segments
# of looatioos
WithC~
Damage
::)
NA
-
'
t
t
Repiacement vatue
{mtmona of d0ll3J'8)
coo:o
::.ccoo
239.2398
U'79.6$U
149-2918
c.ao::o
0.0000
::-995613
2798.5613
t.6520
4.,968.40
with Functionality > 50 %
AfterD.ay 1
0 Aft!!f'Dayl
·c
0 2021-2026 Upd;;te Page 4·62
309
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-33 Utility System Economic Losses in Millions of Dollars SystfHn Component Inventory Value Etonomic loss
Pot.able Water P·pe.,nes o c::mc 0 OC'.)0
Facifit;es O.C3Ct0 .:ioc:>o
Drstribut,on i"'leS :3~.:n~e 25 2!00
239.2398 25.2500
WasteW.itM P •pe,!F!i!S 0.C:lOC {) ocoo
Facitit•es 16:?.e.1112 3466513
01stfibutic-n Lines 143.543', 1.2.8837
1n9.G611 359.3410
Natural Gas P:peiines 53.5Q5tt 0 C!OJO
Facilities O.CDOO n CCJO
Distrioution Lir,es i'.15 ea5o 4 3454
a 149.2918 4.3454
Oil Systems p·pe·roes 0 ooc,c occ:io
Fa,;:i1ities O.CJOC occoo
• 0.0000 0.0000
Ele-c'Jical Power Facht:es ::!7~8.56 3 ·ne, css5
2798_5613 1725.0585
Communi<:3tN>n Facilities 1,6520 3 3758
~ 1.6520 0.3758
4,968.41 2.114.37
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Table 4-34 Expected Utility System Pipeline Damage (Site Specific) Potable Watff
Waste Water
Natural Gas
Oil
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
T01al PlpellnM
Ungltl (mllM)
7.433
4.450
42 0
Number of Number of
Leaks Breaks
~-t,,· 140:?
281'~ 705
0 :i D
Loss Fbtio {-.)
0. 0
o.:io
·c.se.
C.JCi
21. If,
8.94 C.JO
C.J O
4 .54
0.00 O.JO
81.64 22.n
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-63
310
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-35 Expected Potable Water and Electric Power System Performance Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Total#of
House'hotds i
7!,642
At Day 1
42.814
14,746
Number of Households without Service
At0ay3 At0ay7 At0ay30 Af0ay90
41 ,516 38,74e 18J)12 D
J;l.414 .i.on ! 84il i 20
Beyond the modeling estimates of Hazus-MH, there are several other critical facilities which are unique to Merced County and are crucial to the function of the wider region and the state of California. The California Aqueduct, part of the California State Water Project, runs through the western part of Merced County. The State Water Project is a water storage and delivery system of reservoirs, aqueducts, power plants, and pumping plants. Its main purpose is to store water and distribute it to 29 urban and agricultural water suppliers in Northern California, the San Francisco Bay Area, the San Joaquin Valley, the Central Coast, and Southern California. The State Water Project makes deliveries to two-thirds of California's population. An earthquake event, or landslides triggered by one, which damage the aqueduct could disrupt the aqueduct's ability to deliver water, which would have serious impacts to agriculture in the county and water users in many areas of California. Similarly, Interstate 5 runs through the western portion of the county and serves as a major shipping and transportation corridor for all of California and the west coast of the United States. Any damage or impacts to Interstate 5 in Merced County from an earthquake would result in disruptions to the entire state.
Economy
Hazus estimates the long-term economic impacts to the region. The model quantifies this information in terms of income and employment changes within the region. The total economic loss estimated for the earthquake is $4.6 Billion, which includes building and lifeline related losses based on the region's available inventory. An estimated 14% of losses computed by Hazus were related to the business interruption of the region.
Since the building losses are broken into two categories (of direct building losses compared to business interruption losses), building-related losses, which summarize estimated costs to fix or replace structures and damages to properties and their contents, are discussed in more detail in Table 4-26 of this section.
However, business interruption losses are summarized herein. They included the temporary living expenses for people displaced from their homes because of the earthquake event. These business-related economic losses are included in Table 4-35 below.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-64
311
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-36 Building-Related Economic Loss Estimates in Millions of Dollars Category Are.a Single Othrtr Commercial lndustn.al 0th~ Total Family RMidential Income losws
•~ag1; 0 000-: 3 ~769 55 73td 2.•345 3.11320 ~-5.3752
:a:• ta -P.-:e-1at1;d 0.0000 1 !'-65o 48 ~350 1.21::: 1.152:? ~2.'."251 RP1<l 1s 9ga!' '243:?i 24 (1008 ->~!-71i 2,023' 59 1033 Re xalJw. 68.2027 ·e.s52£ 37 6404 5.3e·34 ,6.'W 146.2233 Subtol.11 872012 36.5216 166.6980 9.7280 232721 323.4269 Capiul St~ l~ses
Strvctura~ 120 46'4e 44r.;343 "9 73'3 =..3.a.56 41.M4f 30.033:
'-lcr _ Strucrura1 66g41!2E .:'"i:5 .7760 .;14 1487 5.Z.2-539 S1.t~t6 I .2:,J,e62i Co•'.e~, 238.991') 4i..3851 '03 4403 5e-.440i 47.3-)73 4 Q3.~W 1nven11>ry 0 OQG•j !){>000 2 7310 ~.:)400 2.4403 14,2!13 .Subtow 1028.9183 298.0954 390.0543 170.9202 173.4837 2061.4719 Tou/ I 1116.12 33'.62 556.75 180.65 196.76 2384.90
Source: Hazus-MH 4.2
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
Earthquake effects on the environment, natural resources, and historic and cultural assets could be very destructive depending on the type of seismic activity experienced and secondary/cascading effects from an event (e.g. wildfire). The biggest impact would likely be on older properties such as wooden or masonry buildings, though reinforced masonry structures would be much more resilient during earthquakes.
Future Development
Future development in the county is not anticipated to significantly affect vulnerability to earthquakes when designed according to modern building codes. However future development will result in a slight increase in exposure of the population, building stock, and related infrastructure to earthquakes.
Risk Summary
• Merced County is located in a geologically complex and seismically active region, albeit less so than other areas of California. There are numerous active and potentially active faults in close proximity to the County. The County does not have a history of significant damaging earthquakes. • The overall significance of earthquakes is Medium but ranked High for communities on the western side of the county including Dos Palos and Gustine and in the more densely populated cities such as Merced.
• A moderate earthquake occurring in or near Merced County could result in deaths, casualties, property damage, agricultural and environmental damage, and disruption of normal government and community services and activities.
• The location of the epicenter as well as the time of day and season of the year would have a profound effect on the number of deaths and casualties, as well as property damage. • The hazard of earthquakes varies from place to place, dependent upon the regional and local geology.
• Effects on people: Hazus probabilistic scenario modeling of worst case ground shaking results in estimates of 488-1, 132 people needing hospitalization and between 10-65 deaths depending on the time of day the earthquake hits.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-65
312
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• Effects on property: Hazus probabilistic scenario modeling indicates about 17,106 buildings will be at least moderately damaged, with approximately $2.4 billion in losses. • Effects on economy: The total economic loss estimated for a large earthquake is $4.6 billion, which includes building and lifeline related losses based on the region's available inventory. An estimated 14% of losses computed by Hazus were related to the business interruption of the region. • Effects on critical facilities and infrastructure: Essential facility damage (police, fire, school, medical) is predicted to be low; only 246 hospital beds (51 %) would be available during the earthquake. Utility lifeline systems impacts would be significant particularly to bridges; moderate damage can be expected to water, wastewater, power and communications facilities; loss of water and power would be significant in the days and weeks following the earthquake. • Cascading and Secondary Effects: Earthquakes can cause many cascading effects such as fires, flooding, hazardous materials spills, utility disruptions, landslides, and transportation emergencies.
Ground shaking may cause tsunamis or seiche, the rhythmic sloshing of water in lakes or bays.
Table 4-37 Hazard Risk Summary - Earthquake
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Significant Unlikely Critical Medium
City of Atwater Extensive Occasional Critical Medium
City of Dos Palos Extensive Occasional Critical Medium
City of Gustine Significant Likely Critical Medium
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Limited Medium
City of Los Banos Limited Likely Limited Medium
City of Merced Extensive Occasional Critical Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-66
313
4.2.4 Flood & Levee Failure
Hazard Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Floods are among the most frequent and costly natural disasters in terms of human hardship and economic loss. Floods can cause substantial damage to structures, bridges and roadways, landscapes, and utilities as well as life safety issues. Certain health hazards are also common to flood events. Standing water and wet materials in structures can become breeding grounds for microorganisms such as bacteria, mold, and viruses. This can cause disease, trigger allergic reactions, and damage materials long after the flood. When floodwaters contain sewage or decaying animal carcasses, infectious disease becomes a concern. Direct impacts, such as drowning, can be limited with adequate warning and public education about what to do during floods. Where flooding occurs in populated areas, warning and evacuation will be of critical importance to reduce life and safety impacts.
Floodplains are defined as the areas immediately adjacent to a channel from a river, stream, or other waterway. Floodplains are illustrated on inundation maps, which show areas of potential flooding and water depths. In its common usage and based on FEMA guidelines, the floodplain most often refers to the area that is inundated by the 100-year flood, or the flood that has a one percent chance occurrence in any given year of being equaled or exceeded. The 100-year flood is the national minimum standard to which communities regulate their floodplains through the FEMA NFIP. The 500-year flood is the flood that has a
0.2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. A 500-year flood event would be slightly deeper and cover a greater area than a 100-year flood event. The potential for flooding can change and increase through various land use changes and changes to land surface, which then may result in a change to the floodplain. A change in environment can create localized flooding problems inside and outside of natural floodplains by altering or confining natural drainage channels. These changes are most often created by human activity.
A levee is a raised area that runs along the banks of a river or canal. Levees reinforce the banks and help prevent flooding. By confining the flow, levees can also increase the speed of the water. Levees can be natural or manmade. A natural levee is formed when sediment settles on the riverbank, raising the level of the land around the river. To construct a manmade levee, workers pile dirt or concrete along the riverbanks, creating an embankment. This embankment is flat at the top, and slopes at an angle down to the water. For added strength, sandbags are sometimes placed over dirt embankments.
Levees provide strong flood protection, but they are not failsafe. Levees are designed to protect against a specific flood level and could be overtopped during severe flood events. Levees reduce, not eliminate, the risk to individuals and structure behind them. A levee system failure or overtopping can create severe flooding and high-water velocities. It's important to remember that no levee provides protection from events for which it was not designed, and proper operation and maintenance are necessary to reduce the probability of failure.
Riverine flooding - Riverine flooding, defined as the condition when a watercourse (e.g. river or channel) exceeds its "bank-full" capacity, generally occurs as a result of prolonged rainfall, or rainfall that is combined with already saturated soils from previous rain events. This type of flood occurs in river systems whose tributaries may drain large geographic areas and include one or more independent river basins.
The onset and duration of riverine floods may vary from a few hours to many days. Factors that directly affect the amount of flood runoff include precipitation amount, intensity and distribution, the amount of soil moisture, seasonal variation in vegetation, snow depth, and water-resistance of the surface due to urbanization. Intense storms can overwhelm the local waterways as well as the integrity of any flood control structures. The warning time associated with slow rise floods assists in life and property protection ?021-2026 Update Page 4-67
314
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Localized flooding - Localized flooding problems are often caused by flash flooding, severe weather, or an unusual amount of rainfall. Flooding from these intense weather events usually occurs in areas experiencing an increase in runoff from impervious surfaces associated with development and urbanization as well as inadequate storm drainage systems.
Levee Failure - Flooding from the failure of levees throughout the county or upstream is also of concern.
A catastrophic flood control structural failure could easily overwhelm local response capabilities to save lives and require mass evacuations. Impacts to life safety will depend on the warning time and the resources available to notify and evacuate the public. Loss of life could result, and there could be associated health concerns as well as negative effects to local buildings and infrastructure.
The potential for flooding can change and increase through various land use changes and changes to land surface, which result in changes to the floodplain. Environmental changes can create localized flooding problems in and outside of natural floodplains by altering or confining natural drainage channels. These changes are most often created by human activity.
Encroachment into areas subject to inundation by floodwaters having rapid flows aggravates the risk of flood damage and heightens potential flood hazards by further increasing velocities. To reduce the risk of property damage in areas where the stream flows are high, the community may wish to restrict development in areas outside the floodway. FEMA defines a regulatory floodway as the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. The floodway is illustrated in Figure 4-13 below. The area between the floodway and 1-percent-annual-chance floodplain boundaries is termed the floodway fringe. The floodway fringe encompasses the portion of the floodplain that could be completely obstructed without increasing the water surface elevation of the base flood more than 1 foot at any point. Typical relationships between the floodway and the floodway fringe and their significance to floodplain development are shown in schematic in the following.
Figure 4-13 Floodway Schematic
1.flfRCt:Nl-ANNUAL.CHANCE Fi.OODPLAIH
~ .. ooow•'I' 7 ..... ,. I
f ~ooa £LEYA flON WttU~
CO"Jm!l£0 W!THH~ ft.000WA.,
AllfA()Hi.OODP\.AiN T.,A t COULO Bl IJUO 'Oil
OEVUO,MENT IV IUUSING GROI.IMD
UNE Al IS THE hOOO E\.EVAllOI\I IUOC!E £N(.ltOA(HME'1f
LINE Ct>IS THE J.~000 El.£\IA flON AfTU £NCfl0ACiiM£NT
SJflU,t,<1
0-1ANt,iE1,.
.. ,
£ ~(ROACrtMf"-•
•~lJAClotAftGt IS NOl TO UC££0 ' 0 ~OOT (FIA fl{Q\>lllf"'4HitTI OlHUSf.11 A't,IOu•iT "'SOl(1f'l:> 8" \'; Alf Source: Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping - FEMA, 2019 2021-2026 Update Page 4-68
315
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Geographic Area
The Merced River, in the central part of California, is a 145-mile (233 km)-long tributary of the San Joaquin River flowing from the Sierra Nevada into the Central Valley. It is most well-known for its swift and steep course through the southern part of Yosemite National Park, and the world-famous Yosemite Valley. The river's character changes dramatically once it reaches the foothills and the lowlands, becoming a slowmoving waterway meandering through irrigated fields. Large-scale irrigated agriculture was introduced to the Central Valley in the late 19th century, and led to the construction of numerous state, federal and privately owned dams.
The San Joaquin River swings northwest, passing through many different channels, some natural and some manmade. Northeast of Dos Palos, it is joined by the Fresno and Chowchilla Rivers. Fifty miles downstream, the Merced River (highlighted below in Figure 4-14) empties into the San Joaquin. Canal and flood control development in the late 1800's and early 1900's redirected water flow and managed waterways through a series of canals, water storage and agricultural levies. This led to the conversion on thousands of acres of lake basin land into farmable ground.
Figure 4-14 Merced River
About I 00 m lles (161 km ) •cioss
Source: Merced County website
The Tenaya, Yosemite, Bridalveil, and Pigeon Creeks join the Merced River before it breaches the glacial moraine at the valley's end. From there the river picks up Cascade Creek and turns south near El Portal, flowing through Merced River Canyon. State Route 140 follows the river out of the west entrance to the national park, a few miles before the South Fork Merced River, the largest tributary, joins from the left. The river arcs northwest to receive the North Fork, and a few miles after it enters Lake McClure, formed by New Exchequer Dam. Below New Exchequer, the river flows west through a heavily irrigated region of the Central Valley, passing through Mcswain and Crocker-Huffman Dams and the cities of Hopeton, Delhi and Livingston. It joins the San Joaquin River at Hills Ferry, a few miles south of Turlock. There are also many lakes in the watershed of the Merced River, including Merced Lake, Tenaya Lake, the Chain Lakes, May Lake, Lake McClure, and Lake Mcswain. The Merced River is the third largest tributary of the San Joaquin River.
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-69
316
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The primary cause of local flooding is due to the drainage patterns that flow towards the San Joaquin River Basin and Merced County. The numerous tributaries of the San Joaquin - the Fresno, Chowchilla, Merced, Tuolumne, Mariposa Creek, Calaveras, Mokelumne, and others flowed freely across alluvial flood plains to join the river. All of the major tributaries of the river originate in the Sierra Nevada. Most of the streams that start in the Coast Range are intermittent and contribute little to the flow of the San Joaquin.
During the winter, spring, and early summer, storms and snowmelt swell the river. In 1914 - before the development of major dams and irrigation diversions - the California Department of Engineering estimated the river's flow in full flood at 325,000 cubic feet per second (ds). In late summer and autumn, there is little water left over to replenish stream flow.
The floodplain of the Merced River is well defined from the eastern county boundary to approximately 10 miles above the mouth of the river. Downstream of this point, the floodplain is undifferentiated from the valley floor and major floods can spread out over large areas. Floodplain storage reduces peak flows in the downstream direction. With the diminishing channel capacity of the Merced River, flood hazards increase. During the 1950 flood event, approximately 19,600 acres of land along the Merced River were inundated, including the towns of Snelling and Merced Falls.
The Merced River's primary human use is irrigation. The Merced Irrigation District (MID) operates most of the irrigation infrastructure, which supplies water to 154,394 acres (624.81 km2 ) of farmland. The Irrigation
District and watershed are shown in Figure 4-15. As a whole, the system includes about 4,000 sets of control gates and 793 miles (1,276 km) of canals. Irrigation has taken most of the water out of the lower river, which now rarely reaches the sea. Water that does return to the river does so in for form of irrigation return flows, which carry pesticides, fertilizer and other pollutants. The MID is federally required to allow at least 15,000-acre feet (19,000,000 m3
) of water annually to flow continually down the river, not including flooding. The water has allowed the San Joaquin River below the Merced River confluence to contain water, while above the confluence all its water is usually diverted for irrigation. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-70
317
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-15 Merced Irrigation District Watershed System ----.... -- Source: MID
The physical risks associated with potential flooding and the regulatory requirements for floodplain management are important considerations when decisions are being made regarding future land use throughout the County. Those same risks guide the local and community-level emergency response needs. Economic growth and prosperity in Merced County are dependent upon federal, state, and local agency involvement on regional and local flood management systems. Flood protection regulations within California have been increased over the past few years through legislation. This legislation included the requirement for the California DWR and Central Valley Flood Protection Board to prepare and adopt a Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP) by 2012. The legislation also established certain flood protection requirements for local land use decision making based on the CVFPP. The law sets a higher standard for flood protection for the entire San Joaquin Valley. The standard was set for an urban level flood protection necessary to withstand a 1 in 200 chance of a flood event occurring in any given year (200-year flood) for areas developed or planned to have a population of at least 10,000. It also requires impacted counties to collaborate with cities to develop flood emergency response plans. Figure 4-16 shows the extent of this 200-year flood event based on the Best Available Maps (BAM) developed by California DWR.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-71
318
Figure 4-16 Merced County 200-year Floodplain
STANISLAUS
SANTA CLARA
FRSSNO
Map compiled 312021; 0 5 10 Miles
UI._ ood intended for planning purposes only.
"ff'' • Data Source: Merced County, USFWS,
USAGE Comprehensive Study, DWR
Source: USACE, Wood Planning Team
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan - - · Non-Federal Levee
- 200-Year Floodplain
Waterways
- Lakes
Local Roads
-- Highways
• Urban Communities
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
MADERA
Atwater
Dos Palos
Gustine
Livingston
Los Banos
Merced
Counties
National Wildlife Refuge
Grasslands Wildlife
Managemen!Area
1'
A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-72
319
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
In 2009, FEMA completed their DFIRM conversion and updated a number of flood zone areas using 2005 levee certification criteria. In 2007, the California DWR completed their Awareness Floodplain Mapping of Merced County to identify all pertinent flood hazard areas that are not mapped under FEMA's program, which provides an additional resource for identifying special flood hazard areas within the County.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
The FEMA and the Federal Insurance Administration have assessed flood hazards for major streams in Merced County. A large portion of Merced County continues to be subject to inundation during flood events, as approximately 380,010 acres have been determined to be in the FEMA floodplain. The extent of the floodplain is shown in Figure 4-17. Both a 100-year and 500-year flood event scenario are critical events in Merced County as the flooding would cover at least 35 to 50 percent of the County. More detailed maps are in the jurisdictional annexes.
2021 ·2026 Update Page 4-73
320
Figure 4-17 Merced County 100-year and 500-year Floodplain
STANISLAUS
SANTACLARA
FRESNO
Map compiled 3/2021; 0 5 10Miles
,u ...... od intended for planning purposes only.
TI''-' • Data Source: Merced County, USFWS.
FEMA NFHL 315/2015, DWR
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
MARIPOSA
MADERA
-- Railroads
• Urban Communities
-7 Atwater
Area Protected by Levee L j Dos Palos
Zone O Gustine
C::. ! Livingston
- - - Federal Levee ~ Los Banos
Local Roads
-- Highways
- Interstate
- Merced
l Counties
National \Midlife Refuge
Grasslands \Midlife
Management Area
:'-l
A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-74
321
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The largest flood of record on the Merced River was 46,200 cubic feet per second (cfs) and occurred on December 4, 1950, downstream of Old Exchequer Dam (built in Mariposa County in 1926). The New Exchequer Dam, which has more flood storage capacity, was built in 1967. Based on USGS stream data, the largest discharges along the Merced River since the construction of New Exchequer Dam occurred in 1983 followed by 1997.
During the major flood events in 1969, 1997, 1998, and 2006, Bear Creek overflowed at the southwest end of the City of Merced in the vicinity of Thornton Avenue and State Highway 140. Stream gauge data is not available to quantify the magnitude of these events. Historical records also indicate that Bear Creek overflowed its banks upstream from the G Street Bridge. This overflow was worsened by debris restricting flow under the bridge. The largest flood on the San Joaquin River since the completion of Friant Dam in 1943 occurred in 1997. Along the San Joaquin River during the past century, the five largest flood events include, in order of magnitude, those from 1997, 1938, 1983, 1969, and 2006 based on USGS data. The historical San Joaquin River floodplain widens from approximately 3 to 4 miles in the reach south of Merced County to approximately 19 miles in central Merced County. This large expansion of the floodplain is accompanied by a decrease in channel slope. The floodplain then narrows to approximately 2 miles downstream of the Merced River in the northern part of the county.
Previous Occurrences
Between 1992 and 2002, every county in California was declared a federal disaster area at least once for a flooding event. California has a chronic and destructive flood history. Of the 336 federally declared disasters in California between 1950 and 2020, 37 were flood related. This makes flooding second only to fire in the number of federal disaster declarations in the state. Historically, floods have been the most frequent cause of disaster in Merced County.
Significant flooding occurs in Merced County approximately every five years. Merced County has had two flood events that were federally declared disasters, once in 1969 and again in 2017. FEMA's Flood Insurance Study also listed flooding events in 1937-38, 1950, 1955, 1969, 1983, 1997, 1998, and 2006.
Additionally, NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) database lists 54 flood or flash flood events which have occurred in the county between 1950 and 2020.
Table 4-37 below highlights several notable flood events in the county that resulted in significant damages or involved federal disaster declarations.
Table 4-38 Major Floods in Merced County
Date of Event Incident Description
January-February A series of storms delivered 12-50 inches of rainfall over an 8-day period throughout 1969 Central and Southern California. This affected the San Joaquin Valley and resulted in the first federal disaster for flood in Merced Countv.
March 25, 1998 A series of thunderstorms brought locally heavy rain to the City of Merced area, resulting in rainfall totals for 24 hours ending by the morning of the 25th from 3.5" to 5.9" in the Merced City area. One gauge in the north part of town showed 6.8" in the 48-hour period from the evening of the 23rd to the evening of the 25th. Over 1000 people were evacuated from Merced City and nearby County areas. Over 65 homes and 19 apartments were flooded in and around Merced City as the result of torrential/record-setting rainfall in the previous 18 hours. According to the NCEI database, $9.6 million in property damage and $1.5 million in crop damages occurred during this event.
October 24, 1998 The cool season's first significant rain pushed through Central California. Merced received
0.75" of rain in embedded frontal thundershowers and locally heavy rain in about 2 hours.
Some local street floodinq was reported just south of Hilmar and within Delhi. In Merced a 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-75
322
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Date of Event Incident Description
tree was toppled by the storm. Several traffic accidents occurred on rain-slickened roads.
Accordinci to NCEI, this event also resulted in $120,000 in property damacie and six injuries.
January 10, 2005 Heavy rain resulted in water overflowing from Bear Creek in the Merced area from heavy rainfall damaged a handful of homes on the 11 th, and $200,000 in property damages.
March 22, 2005 Over 4 inches of rain fell in a 24-hour period in the Mariposa County area of Central California, upstream of Merced County. Numerous small creeks flooded in Mariposa, Merced, and Madera Counties. Flooding caused damage to structures within the town of Mariposa and several bridges and roads in and around Hornitos, Merced Falls, and Catheys Valley in Merced and Mariposa Counties. $250,000 in property damage was recorded.
April 4, 2006 Due to continued heavy rain and subsequent high stream flows, a break in Black Rascal Creek flooded homes in north Merced. And Bear Creek raised over its banks in West Merced flooding a residential section in that vicinity. Overall, there were approximately 300 homes flooded around Merced with over 500 people evacuated during the event. $9.72 million in property damaqe.
March 27, 2011 During the frequently stormy period that began on the 18th and ended on the 28th, as much as 7 inches of rain fell in the San Joaquin Valley and up to 10 inches of rain drenched the adjacent foothills while the higher elevations of the Sierra (above 7000 feet) received snow accumulations of up to 15 feet. Excessive runoff combined with an increase in reservoir releases at the major dams caused higher than normal flows along rivers and streams through the end of the month. The Merced River at Stevinson peaked a half of a foot below flood stage at 4:30 pm on the 21st but otherwise remained well above monitor stage during the last two weeks of the month. Water levels along the San Joaquin River approached levels that had not been observed since January 1997. In Merced County, several water swollen creeks briefly flowed out of their banks on the morning of the 20th and caused minor floodinq. The event caused $S00,000 in property damage.
November 30, 2012 California highway patrol reported a multi-vehicle accident in heavy rain on Highway 99 at west side boulevard. Involved three cars and a big rig. Number of injuries unknown at this time. $120,000 in damages were also recorded.
February 1-23, On March 19, 2017, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. requested a major disaster declaration 2017 due to severe winter storms, flooding, and mudslides during the period of February 1-23, 2017. The Governor requested a declaration for public assistance for 42 counties and Hazard Mitiqation statewide. Merced County was included in the declaration.
Source: NCEI Storm Events Database, FEMA
2021-2026 Update Page 4-76
323
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-18 Image of Past Flooding in Merced County
Source: Fox 26 News, Images of February 2017 flooding
Probability of Future Occurrences
Due to the history of past flooding events and the natural drainage pattern of the planning area, flooding in Merced County is likely to continue to occur. The potential for failure of one of the many levees throughout the county could create more risk for flooding. The 100-year flood is the flood that has a one percent chance in any given year of being equaled or exceeded. Based on past events, flooding events less severe than a 100-year flood and those outside of the 100-year floodplain occur frequently during periods of heavy rains. According to the NCEI Storm Events Database, there have been 54 flood events recorded for Merced County between 1990 and 2020. Utilizing the methodology explained in subsection
4.1.1, this means there is a 180% chance of a flood event occurring in a given year. Significant flooding occurs in Merced County approximately every five years.
Climate Change Considerations
California's Fourth Climate Assessment found that costs associated with direct climate change impacts by 2050 will be dominated by human mortality, coastal damage, and the potential for droughts and megafloods (California Natural Resources Agency 2018). Scientific studies outlined in the same assessment also indicated shifts in California's precipitation regime, which show more dry days, more dry years, a longer dry season, and increases in occasional heavy precipitation events and floods. Studies also project greater storm intensity with climate change, resulting in more direct runoff and flooding (California Natural Resources Agency 2018). As a result, high frequency flood events in conjunction with heavy precipitation events and extreme storm events will increase with climate change. Certain climate studies noted in the Fourth Climate Assessment also forecast that during periods with heavy rain and frequent storm events there is an increase in flood events, as well as landslide and debris flow (California Natural Resources Agency 2018). For example, during the 2016-2017 winter, the storms resulted in many secondary hazards, including numerous landslides and in some watersheds an increased sediment load. Also, with wildfires already being a problem in California, increasing periods of drought and lack of precipitation are expected 2021 2026 Update Page 4-77
324
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
to exacerbate conditions for fires to occur, and in turn worsen the potential for runoff and flooding associated with burned areas.
The Fourth Climate Assessment also includes nine reports for the nine regions in California. According to the preview for the San Joaquin Valley Region Summary Report, which has not yet been published at the time of this plan update, the frequency of catastrophic floods will increase in the coming years. This in turn will lead to increased stresses to agriculture, natural ecosystems, water resources, land use and community development, transportation, energy, public health, and climate justice.
Vulnerability Assessment
While there are some benefits associated with flooding, such as the replenishment of sediments and nutrients to agricultural lands, it is considered a hazard to development in floodplains. Floods can cause many cascading effects. Fire can break out as a result of dysfunctional electrical equipment. Hazardous materials can also get into floodways, causing health concerns and polluted water supplies. In many instances during a flood, the drinking water supply will be contaminated. During the 2021 update the following vulnerability analysis using GIS was performed to quantify flood risk.
General Property
Historically, Merced County has been at risk to flooding primarily during the winter and spring months when river systems in the county swell with heavier rainfall and runoff from winter snowmelt. Normally, storm floodwaters are kept within defined limits by a variety of storm drainage and flood control measures. But occasionally, extended heavy rains result in floodwaters that exceed normal high-water boundaries and cause damage. Flooding has occurred in the past within the 100-year floodplain and in other localized areas.
A flood vulnerability assessment was performed for Merced County using the following GIS methodology.
The County's parcel layer and associated assessor's building improvement valuation data were provided by the County and were used as the basis for the inventory. Merced County's effective DFIRM was used as the hazard layer. A DFIRM is FEMA's flood risk data that depicts the 1 % annual chance (100-year) and the
0.2% annual chance (500-year) flood events; this data is incorporated into the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL). Merced County's effective FEMA DFIRM, dated December 2, 2009, was determined to be the best available floodplain data. Figure 4-17 summarizes the flood zones included on these maps.
GIS was used to intersect the parcel boundaries with a master address point layer to obtain the number of buildings per parcel. Only parcels with improvement values greater than zero were used in the analysis, this method assumes that improved parcels have a structure of some type. The DFIRM flood zones were overlaid in GIS on the address points to identify structures that would likely be inundated during a 1 % annual chance and 0.2% annual chance flood event. This overlay can be seen graphically in the regional maps in Figure 4-17, and in more detail in the jurisdictional annexes; Building improvement values and counts for those points were then extracted from the parcel/assessor's data and summed for the unincorporated county and jurisdictions. Results of the overlay analysis area shown in Table 4-38 for the 1 % annual chance flood and Table 4-39 for 0.2% annual chance flood. The jurisdictional annexes provide more detailed information based on property type. Property type refers to the land use of the parcel and includes agricultural, commercial, exempt, industrial, mixed use, residential, and vacant. A loss estimate analysis was also performed based on depth damage functions developed by the Army Corp of Engineers and FEMA. The loss curves depict the expected flood losses associated with the depth of flooding at a structure. Contents values were estimated as a percentage of building value based on their occupancy type, using FEMA/HAZUS estimated content replacement values. This includes 100% of the structure value for agricultural, commercial, exempt, and open space structures, 50% for 2021-2026 Update Page 4-78
325
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
multi-residential and residential structures and 150% for industrial structures. Building and contents values were totaled to obtain total exposure.
There are different depth damage curves for structure and content losses. For the purposes of this planning level analysis, an average flood depth of 2 feet is assumed. A depth damage ratio of 25% was used for structural loss, based on the FEMA damage curves, assuming a 2-foot-deep flood. A loss ratio was also calculated to express the estimated losses in relation to the total value of all property in the jurisdiction, including property values not exposed to the floodplain boundaries. The results are shown in the loss estimate columns in Table 4-38 for the 1% annual chance flood.
The result is an inventory of the number and types of improved parcels subject to flooding. Results are presented by unincorporated county and incorporated jurisdictions. Detailed tables show counts of parcels by jurisdictions and land use type (agricultural, commercial, exempt, industrial, multi-residential, open space and residential) within each flood zone. It is important to note that there could be more than one structure or building on an improved parcel (i.e., a condo complex occupies one parcel but might have several structures). This flood loss analysis does not account for business disruption, emergency services, environmental damages, or displacement costs, thus actual losses could exceed the estimate shown. Conversely, this analysis does not differentiate parcels that may have been developed since when the county and cities adopted floodplain regulations, which would be mitigated to the 1% annual chance flood if developed in accordance with local floodplain regulations.
Table 4-39 1 % Annual Chance Floodplain Exposure and Loss by Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Property Improved Building Improved Estimated Total Value Estimated Loss Type Parcel Count Value Content Value
Count
Atwater Commercial 4 8 $446,109 $446,109 $892,218 $223,055 Exempt 7 7 $0 $0 $0 $0
Industrial 1 1 $16,651 $24,977 $41,628 $10,407
Residential 342 344 $87,919,330 $43,959,665 $131,878,995 $32,969,749 Total 354 360 $88,382,090 $44,430,751 $132,812,841 $33,203,210 Livingston Agricultural 1 1 $7,441 $7,441 $14,882 $3,721 Total 1 1 $7,441 $7,441 $14,882 $3,721
Merced Agricultural 17 19 $704,235 $704,235 $1,408,470 $352,118 Commercial 527 1,873 $339,551,353 $339,551,353 $679,102,706 $169,775,677 Exempt 433 960 $9,185,588 $9,185,588 $18,371,176 $4,592,794 Industrial 118 218 $167,406,079 $251,109,119 $418,515,198 $104,628,799 Mixed Use 9 9 $185,869 $185,869 $371,738 $92,935
Residential 9,161 12,140 $1,218,507,813 $609,253,907 $1,827,761,720 $456,940,430 Vacant 30 38 $1,030,699 $1,030,699 $2,061,398 $515,350
Land
Total 10,295 15,257 $1,736,571,636 $1,211,020,769 $2,947,592,405 $736,898,101 Unincorporated Agricultural 2,240 2,920 $571,674,871 $571,674,871 $1,143,349,742 $285,837,436 Commercial 182 516 $45,633,503 $45,633,503 $91,267,006 $22,816,752 Exempt 84 115 $9,565,302 $9,565,302 $19, 130,604 $4,782,651 Industrial 57 82 $63,423,427 $95,135,141 $158,558,568 $39,639,642 Mixed Use 15 17 $233,502 $233,502 $467,004 $116,751
Residential 2,697 2,967 $319,577,554 $159,788,777 $479,366,331 $119,841,583 2021-2026 Update Page 4-79
326
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Jurisdiction Property Improved Building Improved Estimated Total Value Estimated Loss Type Parcel Count Value Content Value
Count
Vacant 25 26 $131,577 $131,577 $263,154 $65,789
Land
Total 5,300 6,643 $1,010,239,736 $882, 162,673 $1,892,402,409 $473,100,602 Grand 15,950 22,261 $2,835,200,903 $2,137,621,633 $4,972,822,536 $1,243,205,634 Total
Source: Merced County Assessor's Office; NFHL Effective date 12/02/2008, FEMA; GIS analysis Large areas of Merced County are at risk of being inundated by a 100-year flood event. The City of Merced, City of Atwater, and unincorporated areas of the County are predominantly inundated by the 100-year floodplain and have the greatest percentages of total loss from a 100-year flood event. While other jurisdictions are far less at risk during in a 100-year flood event, several jurisdictions including Dos Palos and Gustine are at a greater risk of inundation in the event of a 200-year flood.
Based on this analysis, the Merced County planning area has 15,950 parcels and 22,261 buildings valued over $2.8 billion in the 100-year floodplain. An additional 2,904 parcels and 3,866 buildings valued at roughly $596 million fall within the 500-year floodplain. As a result, total structural exposure is approximately $4.4 billion. When factoring the content values within these areas in addition to the structures the total combined value of exposure is $6.1 billion. Development in the 500-year floodplain is typically not regulated, thus a large flood event could be extremely damaging in the County and Merced.
This information is summarized in Table 4-39 below.
Table 4-40 0.2% Annual Chance Floodplain Exposure and Loss by Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Property Improved Building Improved Estimated Total Value Estimated Type Parcel Count Value Content Loss
Count Value
Merced Commercial 30 31 $62,378,180 $62,378,180 $124,756,360 $31,189,090 Exempt 33 69 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mixed Use 2 3 $41,361 $41,361 $82,722 $20,681
Residential 1,594 2,412 $337,480,454 $337,480,454 $674,960,908 $168,740,227 Total 1,659 2,515 $399,899,995 $399,899,995 $799,799,990 $199,949,998 Unincorporated Agricultural 204 262 $39,295,471 $39,295,471 $78,590,942 $19,647,736 Commercial 6 14 $9,074,287 $9,074,287 $18,148,574 $4,537,144 Exempt 6 6 $3,145,199 $3,145,199 $6,290,398 $1,572,600
Mixed Use 4 4 $148,839 $148,839 $297,678 $74,420
Residential 1,022 1,062 $144,732,798 $144,732,798 $289,465,596 $72,366,399 Vacant 3 3 $6,699 $6,699 $13,398 $3,350
Land
Total 1,245 1,351 $196,403,293 $196,403,293 $392,806,586 $98,201,647 Grand 2,904 3,866 $596,303,288 $596,303,288 $1,192,606,576 $298,151,644 Total
Source: Merced County Assessor's Office; NFHL Effective date 12/02/2008, FEMA; GIS analysis Another method of assessing flood vulnerability is through the utilization of the California DWR BAM which display a 200-year floodplain. The BAM does not replace existing FEMA regulatory floodplains, but rather identifies potential flood risks that may warrant further studies or analysis. Analyzing this floodplain data in the same way as described above revealed an estimated additional 2,159 buildings exposed to flood hazard throughout the unincorporated portions of Merced County. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-80
327
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Insurance Coverage, Claims Paid, and Repetitive Losses
Unincorporated Merced County joined the NFIP in 1979. All of the jurisdictions in the county, with the exception of Gustine, are NFIP participants. The County currently does not participate in the optional CRS, nor do any of the jurisdictions.
In the unincorporated county, there are 1,558 policies in force, of which there are 1,285 single family units, 4 2-4 family, three all other residential, and 266 nonresidential. The number of policies in force by jurisdiction and flood zone are shown in Table 4-40 below. The City of Gustine is not included as it is not a NFIP participant.
Table 4-41 Merced County Community Information System Policies in Force by Flood Zone and Jurisdiction
Flood Zone Merced City of City of City of City of Dos City of County Merced Los Livingston Palos Atwater
Banos
A01-30 & AE 33 275 0 0 0 0
Zones
A Zones 411 51 0 0 0 0
AO Zones 240 573 0 0 0 0
AH Zones 80 114 0 0 0 0
AR Zones 0 0 0 0 0 0
A99 Zones 0 0 0 0 0 0
V01-30 & VE 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zones
VZones 0 0 0 0 0 0
DZones 0 0 0 0 0 0
B,C &XZone
Standard 51 59 0 3 0 1
Preferred 62 119 16 1 3 13
Total 877 1,191 16 4 3 14
Source: FEMA NFIP Community Information System
NFIP data indicates that there are 4,987 insurance policies in Merced County representing $1,084,286,000 of insurance coverage in force. Since 1979 there have been 281 paid losses, totaling $4,484,055. Most of the losses have been in the City of Merced and the unincorporated county. Table 4-41 provides more details on flood insurance policies for each individual jurisdiction.
FEMA insures properties against flooding losses through the NFIP. As part of the process to reduce or eliminate repetitive flooding to structures across the United States, FEMA has developed an official Repetitive Loss Strategy. The purpose behind the national strategy is to identify, catalog, and propose mitigation measure to reduce flood losses to the relatively few numbers of structures that absorb the majority of the premium dollars from the national flood insurance fund.
A repetitive loss property is defined by FEMA as "a property for which two or more NFIP losses of at least $1,000 each have been paid within any 10-year period since 1978". A repetitive loss property may or may not be currently insured by the NFIP. There are 13 repetitive loss buildings in the unincorporated county, 3 of which are insured and a total of $367,067 was paid out. There are no Severe Repetitive Loss properties, as defined by FEMA, anywhere in the County.
2021-2026 Update Page4-81
328
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-42 Merced County Flood Insurance Policy Information Jurisdiction Policies Insurance in Force No. of Paid Losses Total Losses Paid Atwater 14 $4,018,000 1 $1,740
Dos Palos 3 $553,000 0 $0
Gustine N/A N/A N/A N/A
Livinqston 4 $665,000 0 $0
Los Banos 16 $5,180,000 0 $0
Merced 3,401 $772,521,900 151 $2,230,265
Unincorporated 1,558 $301,348,300 129 $2,252,050
Total 4,996 $1,084,286,000 281 $4,484,055
Source: FEMA NFIP Community Information System
People
The total number of residential properties in each floodplain was multiplied by the average household size of 3.32 persons for the County (ACS 2019 estimates) to estimate resident population within mapped flood hazard areas. Based on this analysis, which accounts for residents only and not workers, there are 49,878 residents living in the 100-year flood zone throughout the County. Of all study areas, the City of Merced has the most residents living in the 1 % annual chance flood area, followed by the unincorporated county. Table 4-42 below details population estimates by jurisdiction, followed by similar tables for the 500-year floodplain.
Table 4-43 Population Living in the 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone Jurisdiction Population
Atwater 1,094
Merced 38,877
Unincorporated County 9,907
Total 49,878
Source: Wood GIS analysis on Merced County Assessor's Office data and FEMA NFHL, ACS Census Estimates The same analysis was conducted for the 500-year floodplain, indicating that there are 11,267 residents living in the 500-year flood zone throughout Merced County. The majority of people living in this floodplain are residents of the City of Merced, with almost 8,000 people in the 500-year floodplain. This population distribution is shown in the table below.
Table 4-44 Population Living in the 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone Jurisdiction Population
Merced 7,728
Unincorporated County 3,539
Total 11,267
Source: Wood GIS analysis on Merced County Assessor's Office data and FEMA NFHL, ACS Census Estimates Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Key support facilities and structures most necessary to withstand the impacts of, and respond to, natural disasters are referred to as critical facilities. Examples of these critical facility types include utilities, transportation infrastructure, and emergency response and services facilities, given failures of components along major lifelines or even closures or inaccessibility to key emergency facilities could limit if not 2021-2026 Update Page 4-82
329
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
completely cut off transmission of commodities, essential services, and other potentially catastrophic repercussions. Floods and levee failure have the ability to disrupt, damage, or destroy these critical facilities, which in turn can impede the ability of Merced County to respond to and recover from a major flood event.
A GIS analysis of exposed critical facilities was conducted, similar to the parcel analysis, using H IFLD. The results of critical facilities throughout the county which are exposed to the various flood hazards are shown in Table 4-444 and Table 4-45 below, and organized by the jurisdiction they are located in and the FEMA Lifeline category into which they are classified.
Table 4-45
Jurisdiction
Atwater
Dos Palos
Gustine
Livin ston
Los Banos
Merced
Unincor orated
Total
Critical Facilities Within the 1 % Annual Chance Flood Hazard by FEMA Lifeline and Jurisdiction
Ill
C C 0
.; .: 0
IO GI .; u ... Ill -c -c IO
·c IO :I C C ~
:I 3:: 0 i5 IO i5 IO ~ 0
E >, .... -c ·;: .c Q.
Cl GI .... u ~ ·;: "C ... IO GI ... :s Ill
E i5 .... ai ... i5 GI :I C GI 0 N IO GI - u IO ... 0 C 0 .c IO :E GI :E IO GI ... 0 V w ... Ill J: J: Ill Ill I- I2 2 4 10 0 0
0 0
26 3 30 15 6 51 25 156
13 5 13 11 34 180 256
41 10 44 26 6 86 209 422
Source: HIFLD, FEMA NFHL
Table 4-46
Jurisdiction
Atwater
Dos Palos
Gustine
Livingston
Los Banos
Merced
Unincorporated
Total
Critical Facilities Within the 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard by FEMA Lifeline and Jurisdiction
Ill
C C 0
·.;::; .: 0
IO GI .; u ... Ill -c -c IO
'i: IO :I C C ~
:I 3:: 0 i5 IO i5 IO ~ 0
E >, ... -c ·;: .c Q.
Cl GI ... u >, ·- -c· ... GI ... :s ....... Ill
E .. i5 IO i5 GI :I C 0 ai N .. GI IO GI - u IO ... 0 C 0 .c IO :E GI :E IO GI .... 0 V w ... Ill J: J: Ill Ill I- I0 0 0
0 0
2 2 5 9
5 7
1 0 2 0 2 10 1 16
Source: HIFLD, FEMA NFHL
2021-2026 Update Page 4-83
330
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Economy
Flooding can have a major economic impact on the economy. Based on the flood loss analysis, there are 2,397 commercial structures worth an estimated $771 million in total value directly at risk to flooding in the 1 % annual chance zone. Based on the loss analysis this could result in approximately $193 mi Ilion in direct losses. This does not account for other indirect losses such as business interruption, lost wages and other downtime costs.
Effects on the agriculture economy can be devastating, and a large amount of area at risk to flooding in the County is agricultural. Flooding can damage crops and livestock. In addition to the obvious impacts on crops and animals, flooding can have deleterious effects on soil and the ability to reinvigorate the agricultural activities impacted once the flood waters recede. Damage to water resources such as underground irrigation systems, water storage reservoirs, springs and other natural water bodies could have a serious effect upon agriculture operations.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
There are 15 properties throughout the County on the NRHP. Most of these places are located in the City of Merced, which has the highest risk and exposure to flood hazards.
Natural areas within the floodplain often benefit from periodic flooding as a naturally recurring phenomenon. These natural areas often reduce flood impacts by allowing absorption and infiltration of floodwaters. Natural resources are generally resistant to flooding except where natural landscapes and soil compositions have been altered for human development or after periods of previous disasters such as drought and fire. Wetlands, for example, exist because of natural flooding incidents. A large percentage of flood prone area in the County are wetlands that are part of the San Luis and Merced National Wildlife Refuges. These areas provide natural and beneficial functions to hold and absorb floodwaters. Areas recently suffering from wildfire damage may erode because of flooding, which can temporarily alter an ecological system.
Future Development
Flooding and floodplain management are significant issues for Merced County. The potential or likelihood of a flood event in the county increases with the annual onset of heavy rains in winter and spring months.
Much of the historical growth in the problem areas connected with flooding and stormwater runoff include erosion, sedimentation, degradation of water quality, losses of environmental resources, and certain health hazards. For NFIP participating communities, floodplain management practices implemented through local floodplain management ordinances should mitigate the flood risk to new development in the 100-year floodplains. As noted previously, a large amount of development has occurred in the 500-year floodplain and these areas are not regulated or require flood mitigation.
The development trend in the Merced County planning area is steady growth. Much of this growth is occurring in the urban areas, which can increase stormwater runoff. The 2020 Caltrans Economic Forecast at the county-level for all 58 counties in California for 2018-2050, projects that Merced County's population will continue to increase by 1.3 percent through 2025. Such growth may consume previously undeveloped acres, and the increase in impervious surfaces could affect existing drainage and flood control facilities.
Changes in municipal boundaries such as annexations into the SOI may change the flood risk profile for certain communities. A GIS analysis of 1 % annual chance flood exposure within SOI boundaries is summarized in the tables below.
?.02 1-2026 Update Page 4-84
331
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-47 Sphere of Influence Risk to FEMA 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Sphere of Improved Building Improved Estimated Total Value Estimated Population Loss Influence Parcel Count Value Content Loss Ratio
Count Value
Atwater 72 80 $9,559,223 $6,160,259 $15,719,482 $3,929,871 169 1.4% Livingston 1 1 $103,862 $103,862 $207,724 $51 ,931 0 0.2% Merced 908 1,121 $154,013,086 $111,545,194 $265,558,280 $66,389,570 2,673 7.5% Total 981 1,202 $163,676, 171 $117,809,315 $281,485,486 $70,371,372 2,842 Table 4-48 Sphere of Influence Risk to FEMA 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Sphere Improved Building Improved Estimated Total Value Estimated Population Loss of Parcel Count Value Content Loss Ratio
Influence Count Value
Atwater 1 1 $81,844 $40,922 $122,766 $30,692 3 0.01%
Merced 80 86 $29,663,971 $17,321 ,531 $46,985,502 $11 ,746,375 249 Total 81 87 $29,745,815 $17,362,453 $47,108,268 $11,777,067 252 Risk Summary
The overall significance of the flood hazard is High. The 100-year floodplain in Merced County is vast, and many thousands of residents and millions in property value are within the floodplain. • Countywide there are 22,261 structures at risk worth $4.9 billion, with a loss estimate of $1.2 billion. • The City of Merced accounts for 59% of the total losses in the 100-year floodplain. 48% of the City of Merced's buildings are in the floodplain.
• Commercial structures account for 15.5% of total losses in the 100-year floodplain, with a loss estimate of $193M
• Countywide approximately 49,878 persons live in the 100-year floodplain, of which the vast majority (38,877) are in the City of Merced.
• There are 11,267 persons within the 500-year floodplain and a flood of this magnitude would have severe consequences.
• Levees and flood control dam infrastructure provide some protection, but also pose potential levee and dam failure risks.
• A total of 438 critical facilities are found in 1 % annual chance (422 facilities) and 0.2% annual chance (16 facil ities) flood zones in the county. Most of them are in the City of Merced or in the unincorporated areas of the county.
• Related hazards: Severe weather: Heavy Rain, Wildfire, Landslide and Debris Flow.
Table 4-49 Hazard Risk Summary- Flood & Levee Failure
Jurisdiction Geographic Probability of Magnitude/ Overall Extent Future Severity Significance
Occurrence
City of Atwater Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Dos Palos Limited Occasional Limited Low
Citv of Gustine Siqnificant Occasional Critical Medium
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Negligible Medium 2021-2026 Update Page 4-85
1.3%
332
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Jurisdiction Geographic Probability of Magnitude/ Overall Extent Future Severity Significance
Occurrence
City of Los Banos Limited Likely Limited Medium
City of Merced Significant Likely Limited Medium
202 1-2026 Update Page 4-86
333
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
4.2.5 Landslide
Hazard Problem/Description
A landslide is a geologic hazard where the force of gravity combines with other factors to cause earth material to move or slide down an incline. Some landslides move slowly and cause damage gradually, whereas others move so rapidly that they can destroy property and take lives suddenly and unexpectedly.
Slopes with the greatest potential for sliding are between 34 degrees and 37 degrees. Although steep slopes are commonly present where landslides occur, it is not necessary for the slopes to be long.
Debris flows are a mixture of rock fragments, soil, vegetation, water and, in some cases, entrained air that flows downhill as a fluid. Debris flows can range in consistency from that of freshly mixed concrete to running water. Debris flows can be further classified as mudflows and earth flows depending on the ratio of water to soil and rock debris.
Landslide and debris flow problems can be caused by land mismanagement, particularly in mountain, canyon, and coastal regions. In areas burned by forest and brush fires, a lower threshold of precipitation may initiate landslides and debris flows. As human populations expand over more of the land surface, these processes become an increasing concern.
There are predictable relationships between local geology and landslides, rockslides, and debris flows. The downslope movement of earth material, either as a landslide, debris flow, mudslide, or rockslide, is part of the continuous, natural process of erosion. This process, however, can be influenced by a variety of causes that change the stability of the slope. Slope instability may result from natural processes, such as the erosion of the toe of a slope by a stream, or by ground shaking caused by an earthquake. Slopes can also be modified artificially by grading, or by the addition of water or structures to a slope. Development that occurs on a slope can substantially increase the frequency and extent of potential slope stability hazards.
Knowledge of these relationships can improve planning and reduce vulnerability. Slope stability is dependent on many factors and their interrelationships, including rock type, moisture content, slope steepness, and natural or manmade undercutting.
Geographic Area
In Merced County the landscape is largely characterized by the San Joaquin Valley, which is relatively flat and takes up the majority of the central portion of the county. To the eastern edge of the county, lying within the foothills of the Sierra Nevada range, and the western edge, within the Coast Range, there are several geologic formations commonly associated with slope stability problems. Figure 4-19 below provides a summary of landslide hazard potential. As shown in the map, the areas of the county with the greatest potential susceptibility to landslide hazards are in the far southwest of the county, on the western side of Interstate 5. This area is all unincorporated area in the county and is largely rural in character, indicating a lower potential risk to property and infrastructure relative to other counties in California. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-87
334
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Ha_zard Miti_g_ation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-19 Merced County Deep-Seated Landslide Susceptibility ~ ---------......
SAN JOAOUIN
I ·
""'""'"'\ ;~- I ,~ - Del, h .. '
MARIPOSA
~~-~ ____,....,.-__,
_)
'-·~~-.___....,,..,,
\ ~ >,,:r 1, / ·~ •-~- ,
Y. ""'""o
.-·'-. ~ -
'
Map compiled 312021 ; '"OOd intended for planning purposes only . ....,, • Data Source; Merced County,
0 H1lmar . ·'I' . ~ w1nto' Castle!
Livingston •
~ Atwater . • ,,.,.., ,
-.... ~ -..... -- ~ .... --~---- - ,,--·-
F.i1ke
I) li>w'1m1e \ /"
• University Commun,!Y/
.J.1~ 1 ;, A -;,lanada
/
/
/
" Los (
Banos 1
~~33
./-----··_/~ Deep-Seated l andslide Susceptibility
Classes
1111• I ~
~
0 5
.....
\
\
MADERA D o
c:J 111
LJV
VI > r--i VII ', i L. .....I
~' - VIII
FRESNO
10 Miles
J..J
"--, - IX
\
\ , • • x \\ .- .. .,
t-~7,1 ~ I" '-a) • Urban Commun~1es ··;;,.,~-..,..
\ " - _ LJCities
N
Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey A 2021-2026 Update Page 4-88
335
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
The extent of landslides and debris flow events within the county range from negligible to significant.
Landslides and rockslides can result in the destruction of infrastructure such as water and sewer lines, electrical and telecommunications utilities and drainage where they are present. There is potentially risk to Interstate 5, near the county border with Fresno County. There is limited potential for complete destruction of buildings and death and injury from landslides and debris flow.
Previous Occurrences
There have not been any disaster declarations associated with landslides in Merced County. According to records from the California Department of Conservation's Geological Survey, there have been no recent records of landslides in Merced County and no active mapping efforts within the county. Several adjacent counties, such as Madera, Mariposa, and Santa Clara, have recent or active landslides which have been recorded. This historic record would indicate that landslides occasionally occur in Merced County, but largely affect undeveloped areas.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Based on historical data which suggests limited risk of landslides, but given the presence of landslide susceptible geology and steep slopes within the planning area, it is safe to assume that landslides may occur in the future, with damaging landslides occurring much less frequently. Landslides are usually a cascading effect of severe weather or a period of extended wet weather that saturates local soils. The probability for more severe and damaging landslides increases during El Nino years or severe winter storms. The potential for debris flows dramatically increases following a wildfire.
Climate Change Considerations
Landslides can result from intense rainfall and runoff events. Projected climate change-associated variance in rainfall events may result in more high-intensity events, which may increase landslide frequency. In addition, the increased potential of wildfire occurrence also escalates the risk of landslide and debris flows in the period following a fire, when slopes lack vegetation to stabilize soils and burned soil surfaces create more rainfall runoff. As climate change affects the length of the wildfire season, it is possible that a higher frequency of large fires may occur into late fall, when conditions remain dry, and then be followed immediately by intense rains early in the winter, as occurred with the Thomas Fire in December 2017 and subsequent Montecito and Carpinteria debris flows in January 2018 in Santa Barbara County (CA SHMP 2018).
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
Landslides directly damage engineered structures in two general ways: 1) disruption of structural foundations caused by differential movement and deformation of the ground upon which the structure sits, and 2) physical impact of debris moving downslope against structures located in the travel path.
During the 2021 update of this plan, a GIS analysis of exposure to landslide hazard areas was performed.
GIS analysis indicates approximately $317 million of property improvements exposed, which takes into account improved values of properties. Table 4-49 summarizes landslide exposure by jurisdiction. GIS was used to intersect the parcel boundaries with a master address point layer to obtain the number of buildings per parcel. Only parcels with improvement values greater than zero were used in the analysis, this method assumes that improved parcels have a structure of some type. 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-89
336
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Based on this analysis there is a total of 482 improved parcels and 547 buildings potentially within landslide hazard areas. The majority of this exposure is in the western unincorporated county. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the actual risk to these exposed parcels, thus a more specific loss estimation is not provided. A more detailed, site specific analysis would be needed to assess actual risk within the identified parcels.
Table4-50 Merced County Improved Properties at Risk to Landslide Jurisdiction Improved Total Improved Estimated Total Value Population Parcel Building Value Content Value
Count Count
Atwater 11 11 $3,479,587 $2,831,312 $6,310,899 32
Livingston 1 1 $2,714,360 $1,357,180 $4,071,540 4
Merced 27 42 $4,762,383 $2,381,192 $7,143,575 112
Unincorporated 443 493 $156,446,776 $142,936,749 $299,383,525 Total 482 547 $167,403,106 $149,506,432 $316,909,538
Source: Dept. of Conservation, California Geological Survey, Merced County Assessor, Wood GIS Analysis Figure 4-20 below further breaks down the numbers of exposed buildings by landslide class, as shown previously in Figure 4-19; the higher the class the greater the susceptibility.
Figure 4-20 Total Building Counts by Landslide Class
People
322
470
People could be susceptible if they are caught in a landslide or debris flow, potentially leading to injury or death. There is also a danger to drivers operating vehicles, as rocks and debris can strike vehicles passing through the hazard area or cause dangerous shifts in roadways. The parcel analysis described previously estimated the number of people potentially residing in landslide susceptible areas (470), but it is not likely that landslides will occur without warning and direct impacts to people are suspected to be minimal. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-90
337
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
In addition to buildings, utilities and transportation structures are vulnerable to the impact and ground deformation caused by slope failures. They present a particular vulnerability because of their geographic extent and susceptibility to physical distress. Lifelines are generally linear structures that, because of their geographic extent, have a greater chance of being affected by ground failure due to greater hazard exposure.
Extension, bending, and compression caused by ground deformation can break lifelines. Failure of any component along the lifeline can result in failure to deliver service over a large region. Once broken, transmission of the commodity through the lifeline ceases, which can have catastrophic repercussions down the line: loss of power to critical facilities such as hospitals, impaired disposal of sewage, contamination of water supplies, disruption of all forms of transportation, release of flammable fuels, and so on. Therefore, the overall impact of lifeline failures, including secondary failure of systems that depend on lifelines, can be much greater than the impact of individual building failures.
Table 4-50 below summarizes the results of the critical facilities analysis, highlighting the exposure of critical facilities throughout the county to landslide hazards. All of the exposed critical facilities are located in unincorporated areas of the county, largely to the west of Interstate 5.
Table 4-51 Critical Facilities Within the Class 9 Landslide Hazard by FEMA Lifeline Health Safety
Jurisdiction Landslide CommuniClass cations Energy
Food,
Water,
Shelter
Hazardous
Material and and Transportation
Medical Security
9 2 26
8 48
7 4
Uninc. 6
5 4 80
3 Total 9 158 0 0 0 0
Source: California Geological Survey, HIFLD, Wood GIS Analysis Economy
Economic impacts typically center around transportation routes temporarily closed by debris flow or landslide activity. These roads may be used to transport goods across the county or provide access by visitors and tourists. Depending on the amount of damage, the road may simply need to be cleaned off, or may require some level of reconstruction.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
As primarily a natural process, landslides and debris flows can have varying impacts to the natural environment; debris flows have the potential to permanently alter the natural landscape.
Future Development
The severity of landslide problems is directly related to the extent of human activity in hazard areas.
Human activities such as property development and road construction can also exacerbate the occurrence of landslides. Future development should take place carefully to prevent landslide damage to property or people. Adverse effects can be mitigated by early recognition and avoiding incompatible land uses in 2021-2026 Update Page 4-91
46 3
49 Total
28 49
so
1 87
1 216
338
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard identification and Risk Assessment
these areas or by corrective engineering. Improving mapping and information on landslide hazards and incorporating this information into the development review process could prevent siting of structures and infrastructure in identified hazard areas. The 2030 General Plan has provisions to address this goal, by prohibiting habitable structures atop unconsolidated landslide debris, discouraging grading and construction on slopes greater than 30%, and enforcing grading standards of the International Building Code.
Risk Summary
The overall significance of landslides in Merced County is low. • The geologic formations commonly associated with slope stability problems in Merced County, are largely concentrated in the far western and eastern edges of the county, which are also the least populated.
• Effects on people: People are most commonly at risk if they are caught in a landslide or debris flow, including when driving through a hazard area.
• Effects on property: Property loss is rare, but GIS analysis shows there is some property which could be exposed to landslides.
• Effects on economy: Landslides in adjacent counties can disrupt major transportation corridors, possibly affecting the local tourist economy and shipment of goods. • Effects on critical facilities and infrastructure: Landslides and debris flows can result in the destruction of infrastructure such as water and sewer lines, electrical and telecommunications utilities and drainage. Disrupted transportation routes occur occasionally, usually during heavy rainstorms, and cause considerable inconvenience.
• Related Hazards: Earthquake, Adverse Weather, Wildfire.
Table 4-52 Hazard Risk Summary - Landslides
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Limited Occasional Limited Low
City of Atwater N/A
City of Dos Palos N/A
City of Gustine N/A
City of Livingston N/A
City of Los Banos N/A
City of Merced N/A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-92
339
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
4.2.6 Severe Weather: General
The climate in the Central Valley is defined generally by hot, dry summers and foggy, rainy winters. Severe weather is generally any destructive weather event, but usually occurs in Merced County as localized thunderstorms that bring heavy rain and strong winds that occur most often during the winter and spring months. The agricultural industry is among the most vulnerable asset to severe weather. Agricultural losses resulting from natural hazards can have dramatic impacts on the economic health of Merced County.
For this plan, adverse weather is broken down as follows:
• Freeze
• Extreme Heat
• Dense Fog
• Heavy Rain
• High Wind/Tornado
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's NCEI has been tracking adverse weather since 1950. Their Storm Events Database contains data on the following: all weather events from 1993 to 2017 (except from 6/1993-7 /1993); and additional data from the Storm Prediction Center, which includes tornadoes (1950-1992), thunderstorm winds (1955-1992), and hail (1955-1992). This database contains 254 storm events that occurred in Merced County between January 1, 1950, and December 2020. The table below summarizes these events.
Table 4-53 NCEI Hazard Event Reports for Merced County, 1950-2020 Hazard # of Events Property Loss ($) Crop Loss ($) Deaths Injuries Dense Fog* 102 $1, 160,00 $0 3 7
Frost/Freeze* 31 $0 $0 0 0
Heavy Rain 23 $2,007,500 $15,660,000 0 0
StronQ Wind* 20 $90,800 $513,000 0 0
Funnel Cloud 18 $0 $0 0 0
Tornado 14 $410,000 $50,000 0 1
Heat* 13 $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind* 12 $995,000 $2,110,000 0 4
Hail 9 $30,000 $1,233,000 0 4
Liqhtninq 8 $1,000,000 $0 0 1
Thunderstorm Wind 4 $430,000 $3,100,000 0 0
Total 254 $4,963,300 $22,666,000 3 17
Source: NCEI Storm Events Database, www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/ *Hazards with wide extents reflect larger zones that extend beyond Merced County.
The NCEI table above summarizes adverse weather events that have occurred in Merced County from 1950 to 2020. Only a few of the events actually resulted in state and federal disaster declarations. It is interesting to note that different data sources capture different events during the same time period, and often different information specific to the same events. While the HMPC recognizes these inconsistencies, this data provides value in depicting the County's "big picture" hazard environment.
Due to size of the County and changes in elevation and climate, weather conditions can vary greatly across the County. The profiles that follow provide information, where possible, from two weather stations in different parts of the County: Merced Municipal Airport Weather Station in the northeastern part of the county (1889-2016) and the Los Banos City weather station in the southwestern part of the county (1906- 2016). The temperature data from these two weather stations are displayed in subsection 4.3.7 below. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-93
340
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
4.2.7 Severe Weather: Extreme Temperatures: Freeze and Extreme Heat Hazard/ Problem Description
Extreme temperature events, both cold and hot, can have severe impacts on human health and mortality, natural ecosystems, and agriculture and other economic sectors.
Freeze
Extreme cold often accompanies a winter storm or is left in its wake. Prolonged exposure to cold can cause frostbite or hypothermia and can be life-threatening. Infants and the elderly are most susceptible.
Pipes may freeze and burst in homes or buildings that are poorly insulated or without heat. Freezing temperatures can cause significant damage to the agricultural industry.
Extreme Heat
Extreme heat events can have severe impacts on human health and mortality, natural ecosystems, the agriculture sector and other economic sectors. According to information provided by FEMA, extreme heat is defined as temperatures that hover 10 degrees or more above the average high temperature for the region and last for several weeks. Heat kills by taxing the human body beyond its abilities, usually from heat stroke. In a normal year, about 175 Americans succumb to the demands of summer heat. According to the NWS, among natural hazards, only the cold of winter-not lightning, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, or earthquakes-takes a greater toll. As a comparison, in the 40-year period from 1936 through 1975, nearly 20,000 people were killed in the United States by the effects of heat and solar radiation. In the heat wave of 1980, more than 1,250 people died. The 2018 California State Hazard Mitigation Plan (SHMP) notes the 2006 heat wave led to 650 deaths in a 13-day period (Cal OES 2018) and in the past 15 years heat waves have claimed more lives in California than all other declared disaster events combined (California Climate Adaptation Strategy 2018).
Heat disorders generally have to do with a reduction or collapse of the body's ability to shed heat by circulatory changes and sweating or a chemical (salt) imbalance caused by too much sweating. When heat gain exceeds the level the body can remove, or when the body cannot compensate for fluids and salt lost through perspiration, the temperature of the body's inner core begins to rise, and heat related illness may develop. The elderly, small children, individuals who work outside, patients with chronic medical conditions, those on prescription medication therapy, and people with weight and alcohol problems are particularly susceptible to heat reactions, especially during heat waves in areas where moderate climate usually prevails.
Geographic Area
Freeze
The entire county is susceptible to extreme temperatures. Unseasonable cold temperatures can have large impacts on crops in Merced County. The growing season is approximately 257 days per year, and the frost-free period usually extends from mid-February to mid-November. The mean frost-free period in the western part of the county is 225-250 days.
Extreme Heat
The climate in Merced County is hot and arid, and the entire county is susceptible to extreme heat. The agriculturally dominated central region of the county is likely to experience the greatest impacts from large or unseasonable temperature variations. The more urbanized areas of the County may experience the Urban Heat Island Effect due to the amount of impervious surfaces in those areas that absorb and keep heat longer. The HMPC noted the cities of Merced and Dos Palos have experienced annual summer heat waves that have taken place in the past five years and have led to opening of cooling centers. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-94
341
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
Freeze
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
In 2001, the NWS implemented an updated Wind Chill Temperature index. This index was developed to describe the relative discomfort/danger resulting from the combination of wind and temperature. Wind chill is based on the rate of heat loss from exposed skin caused by wind and cold. As the wind increases, it draws heat from the body, driving down skin temperature and eventually the internal body temperature.
Overall, freeze impacts would likely be limited in the planning area, with the greatest impact being on the agricultural industry.
Figure 4-21 National Weather Service Wind Chill Chart
Temperature (0 f)
Calm 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 ·5 ·10 -15 ·20 -25 ·40 ·45 5 2' 28 =~~~~~- 57 -~
21 9 3
19 13 6 0 7
24 17 11 4 ·l ·9
23 16 9 3 -4 - 11
22 15 8 ·5 · 12
21 14 7 0 .7
20 l3 6 1 ·8
19 12 s ·2 .9
19 12 -3
3 Source: NWS
Extreme Heat
Figure 4-22 illustrates the relationship of temperature and humidity to heat disorders. The heat index describes how hot the heat-humidity combination makes the air feel. As relative humidity increases, the air seems warmer than it actually is because the body is less able to cool itself via evaporation of perspiration. As the heat index rises, so do health risks. Specifically:
• When the heat index is 90°F, heat exhaustion is possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity.
• When it is 90° to 105°F, heat exhaustion is probable with the possibility of sunstroke or heat cramps with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity.
• When it is 105° to 129°F, sunstroke, heat cramps or heat exhaustion is likely, and heatstroke is possible with prolonged exposure and/or physical activity. • When it is 130°F and higher, heatstroke and sunstroke are extremely likely with continued exposure.
Physical activity and prolonged exposure to the heat increase the risks. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-95
342
Figure 4-22 National Weather Service Heat Index Chart
NWS Heat Index
40 80 81
45 80 82 84
'#. - 50 81 83 85
-
~ 55 81 8 86
:S 60 82 84 88
·e 65 a2 as e9
:,
:c 70 83 86 90
.~ 75 84 88 92
":; 80 84 89 94 & 86 85 90
90 86 91
95 86 93
100 87 95
Temperature (
0 ft
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Likelihood of Heat Oisofders With Prolonged Exposure or Strenuous Activity D Caution O Extreme caution Danger ■ Extreme Danger
Source: Source: NWS Note: Since heat index values were devised for shady, light wind conditions, exposure to full sunshine can increase heat index values by up to 15°F. Also, strong winds, particularly with very hot, dry air, can be extremely hazardous.
The NWS has a system in place to initiate alert procedures (advisories, watches, and warnings) when high temperatures are expected to have a significant impact on public safety. The expected severity of the heat determines which type of alert is issued. The "California OES Contingency Plan for Excessive Heat Emergencies" (2014) indicates that through the use of historical weather and mortality data, the NWS and the California Department of Public Health have identified five major types of climate regions within California to account for climate differences among regions in order to recognize what constitutes an excessive heat event in each of the regions. When temperatures spike for two or more consecutive days without an adequate drop in nighttime temperature to cool the outdoor and indoor environments, there is a significant increase in the risk to vulnerable populations.
Overall, extreme heat impacts would likely be limited in the planning area, with the central portions of the County being most affected. Extreme heat will have an impact on vulnerable populations as well as impact the agricultural industry if the event occurs during certain times of the year.
Past Occurrences
A search of records from 1950 to 2020 in the NCEI Storm Events Database showed that between 2000 and 2016 there were 31 frost and freeze events and 13 heat events in Merced County. No records for either hazards were found between 1950 and 2000 or after 2016 in the NCEI database. Since 1972 there have been 4 federally declared disaster in the County for freeze events (refer to Table 4-3). In 2007, 2009 and 2011 and 2012 the USDA designated Merced County as a disaster area due to freeze and extreme cold.
During these events, California's San Joaquin Valley farming communities were hit with freezing temperatures that severely affected the region's crops and resulted in presidential disaster declarations (2007). The declarations made federal funds available to supplement unemployment compensation for farm laborers and other farm industry workers put out of work as a direct result of lost seasonal crops. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-96
343
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Probability of Future Occurrences
Highly Likely - Temperatures at or above 95°F are common most summer days throughout Merced County, and it is highly likely that extreme heat will continue to occur on an annual basis in the future.
In the past, severe freezes have occurred every few years. Based on the NCEI data, 31 frost and freeze events incidents over a 16-year period equates to a major event every 2 years and a 52 percent chance of a major freeze event in any given year.
Climate Change Considerations
Although heat waves will likely become more frequent, there is also the potential for continued cold outbreaks in winter, even in an overall warmer climate. This could have direct impacts on human health in terms of heat related illness. With the general trend of increased warming of average temperatures, extreme high temperatures will likely increase as well. Cascading impacts include increased stress on water quantity and quality, degraded air quality, and increased potential for more severe or catastrophic natural events such as heavy rain, droughts, and wildfire. Another cascading impact includes increased duration and intensity of wildfires with warmer temperatures. According to the 2013 document, "Preparing California for the Extreme Heat", Cal-Adapt projects that throughout California urban and rural population centers will experience an average of 40 to 53 extreme heat days by 2050 and an average of 40 days by 2099; compared to a historical average of 4 per year (Cal-Adapt 2013).
Extreme heat has also been shown to accelerate wear and tear on the natural gas system and electrical infrastructure (California Natural Resources Agency 2018a). Projected increases in summer demand associated with rising temperatures may increase risks to energy infrastructure and may exceed the capacity of existing substations and distribution line infrastructure and systems.
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
The risks of extreme temperatures are often profiled as part of larger hazards, such as severe winter storms or drought. However, as temperature variances may occur outside of larger hazards or outside of the expected seasons but still incur large costs, it is important to examine them as stand-alone hazards.
Extreme cold may also lead to higher electricity and natural gas demands to maintain appropriate indoor heating levels combined with damages caused to the delivery infrastructure such as frozen lines and pipes. Cold temperatures may also impact transportation infrastructure and road conditions through increased wear and stresses on asphalt roads and bridges. Exposed populations may be at risk while waiting for public transportation, particularly when combined with wind chill, and some vehicles may not start, which impacts the commute of the workforce and, in worst case scenarios, the movement of emergency services personnel.
Recent research indicates that the impact of extreme heat, particularly on vulnerable (?) populations, has been historically under-represented. The risks of extreme heat are often profiled as part of larger hazards, such drought or wildfire. However, as temperature variances may occur outside of larger hazards or outside of the expected seasons but still incur large costs, it is important to examine them as stand-alone hazards. Extreme heat may overload demands for electricity to run air conditioners in homes and businesses during prolonged periods of exposure and presents health concerns to individuals that work outside in extreme temperatures. While extreme heat rarely damages buildings, like cold temperatures it can cause infrastructure damage to roads.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-97
344
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
People
Traditionally, the very young and very old are considered at higher risk to the effects of extreme temperatures, but any populations working or recreating outdoors during periods of extreme cold or heat are exposed, including otherwise young and healthy adults and homeless populations. While everyone is vulnerable to extreme temperature incidents, some populations are more vulnerable than others. Extreme heat poses the greatest danger for Merced's thousands of outdoor laborers who support the County's agriculture economy who are exposed to extreme temperatures and at higher risk of heat related illnesses than other populations of the county.
The elderly, children, people in poor physical health, and the homeless are also vulnerable to exposure.
Arguably, the young-and-otherwise-healthy demographic may also experience a higher vulnerability of exposure, due to the increased likelihood that they will be out in temperatures of extreme heat and cold, whether due to commuting for work or school, conducting property maintenance such as lawn care, or for recreational reasons.
Critical Facilities
Water infrastructure is at risk from freezing, including line breaks and frozen valve gates affecting the distribution system. The county and municipal governments wrap pipes before freezing temperature events to help prevent damage.
Extreme heat can affect road infrastructure, damaging and buckling road surfaces. Other direct impacts to critical infrastructure includes power line sagging and power surges. Critical infrastructure such as water pumping stations that rely on public utility systems that could be overloaded may result in impacts during extreme heat events. Peak demand exceeding the local utility's capacity for supply can lead to blackout or brownout conditions, or Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS). The loss of utilities or power outages during extreme heat events could also result in adverse secondary impacts to sensitive populations. Electrical power outages may impact response capabilities or care capabilities for hospitals and clinics.
Economy
Prolonged freezing temperatures can damage or destroy crops, affecting the economy and agricultural jobs in Merced County. According to the USDA RMA Indemnity Report, since 2007 there have been 22,308 acres lost to freeze/frost resulting in $12,933,721 indemnity payments due to insured crop loss.
Annualized crop loss is estimated to be $170,181 due to freeze events.
Extreme heat impacts on the economy may be more indirect compared to other hazards. Merced County has a large agriculture economy. As noted previously outdoor laborers who are exposed to extreme heat and at a high risk of heat related illnesses, and a long-term heat event could cause work interruptions.
Crops are also impacted by heat events and could have an impact on the overall economy in the county.
According to the USDA RMA Indemnity Report, since 2007 there have been 20,207 acres lost to heat resulting in $17,612,071 indemnity payment due to insured crop loss. There is an estimated $187,362 of annualized crop loss due to heat.
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
Extreme heat may cause temporary drought-like conditions. For example, several weeks of extreme heat increases evapotranspiration and reduces moisture content in vegetation, leading to higher wildfire vulnerability for that time period even if the rest of the season is relatively moist. Extreme cold can cause vegetation to freeze and cause high stress leading to decline and even disappearance of vegetation on or within landscapes.
?021-2026 Update Page 4-98
345
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Future Development
Since structures are not usually directly impacted by severe temperature fluctuations, continued development is less impacted by this hazard than others in the plan. However, pre-emptive measures such as construction of green buildings that require less energy to heat and cool, use of good insulation on pipes and electric wirings, and smart construction of walkways, parking structures, and pedestrian zones that minimize exposure to severe temperatures may help increase the overall durability of the buildings and the community to temperature variations. Continued development also implies continued population growth, which raises the number of individuals potentially exposed to variations in temperature. Public education efforts should continue to help the population understand the risks and vulnerabilities of outdoor activities, property maintenance, and regular exposures during periods of extreme heat.
Risk Summary
• Average annual maximum temperature is 76°F and the average annual minimum temperatures is 47°F /48°F.
• On average there is between 97 and 98 days per year above 90°F and about 30 days per year where the minimum temperatures is below freezing (32°F).
• Highest recorded temperatures for the northwestern portion of County is 114°F on July 24, 1902.
While the lowest recorded temperature was 13°F on January 13, 2007. • High recorded temperatures for the southwestern portion of County is 116°F on July 25, 1931. The lowest recorded temperatures is 14°F on January 11, 1949. • Extreme temperatures can have considerable impacts on human health, the natural environment and the economy.
• The County's agriculture economy is at risk of extreme temperatures from outdoor laborers being vulnerable to heat illnesses as well as crop losses due to heat and freeze and frost. • Since 2007 there has been 42,515 acres of crop lost to extreme temperatures and a combined $30,545,793 indemnity payments made for insured crop loss to due freeze/frost and heat events. • The very young, the very old, people with poor physical health and the homeless are more susceptible to the impacts of extreme temperatures.
• Climate change is projected to increase temperatures in the Central Valley region of the State. • Related hazards: Drought, Land Subsidence, Wildfire, Agriculture/Pest Infestation/Plant Disease Table 4-54 Hazard Risk Summary- Extreme Temperatures (Freeze) Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Limited Likely Limited Low
City of Dos Palos Significant Likely Limited Medium
City of Gustine Limited Occasional Negligible Medium
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Negligible Medium City of Los Banos Limited Occasional Negligible Medium
City of Merced Significant Likely Limited Low
2021-2026 Update Page 4-99
346
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table4-SS Hazard Risk Summary - Extreme Temperatures (Extreme Heat) Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Severity Significance Occurrence
Merced County Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Extensive Likely Limited High
City of Dos Palos Extensive Likely Negligible Low
City of Gustine Extensive Likely Limited High
City of Livingston Extensive Likely Limited High
City of Los Banos Significant Highly Likely Negligible Medium City of Merced Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-100
347
4.2.8 Severe Weather: Dense Fog
Hazard/Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Fog results from air being cooled to the point where it can no longer hold all of the water vapor it contains. For example, rain can cool and moisten the air near the surface until fog forms. A cloud-free, humid air mass at night can lead to fog formation, where land and water surfaces that have warmed up during the summer are still evaporating water into the atmosphere. This is called radiation fog. A warm moist air mass blowing over a cold surface also can cause fog to form, which is called advection fog.
The interior California valleys have a unique fog problem called the tule fogs. The tule fog is a radiation fog, which condenses when there is a high relative humidity, typically after a heavy rain, calm winds, and rapid cooling during the night. The longer nights during the winter months create this rapid ground cooling and results in a pronounced temperature inversion at a low altitude, creating a thick ground fog.
Above the cold, foggy layer, the air is typically warm and dry. Once the fog has formed, turbulent air is necessary to break through the inversion. Daytime heating can also work to evaporate the fog in some areas. The tule fogs get their name from the tule reeds, which grew around the swamps and deltas of the great Tulare Lake that once covered the southern end of the San Joaquin Valley.
The tule fog season in Merced County is typically in the late fall and winter (November through March) but can occur as late as May. Fog typically forms rapidly in the early morning hours. Tule fogs can last for days, sometimes weeks. Fog can have devastating effects on transportation corridors in the County.
Nighttime driving in the fog is dangerous and multi-car pileups have resulted from drivers using excessive speed for the conditions and visibility. Tule fog has also been found to be connected to air pollution and exacerbates the naturally occurring fog. A study published in the Journal of Geophysical Research in 2019 found that air pollution is a key contributor to the seasonal fog, and due to the passage of the Clean Air Act in 1970, it has declined about 75 percent since 1980 (Gray 2019).
Figure 4-23 Tule Fog over Central Valley
(
Source: NASA, Jeff Schmaltz, January 5, 2005
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-101
348
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Geographic Area
The San Joaquin Valley is hemmed in on three sides by mountain ranges, with resulting inversion layers trapping cooler air on the valley floor. This predisposes the area to severe episodes of fog in winter months, when barometric pressures are high, humidity is increased, and ambient temperatures are low. All areas of the county are vulnerable to dense fog events.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
Tule fog forms on clear nights when the ground is moist, and the wind is near calm and can be widespread throughout the San Joaquin Valley. On nights like this, the ground cools rapidly. In turn, the moist air above it cools and causes water vapor to condense. Once it has formed, the air must be heated enough to either evaporate the fog or lift it above the surface so that visibilities improve. Common areas for tule fog to form include foothills and valleys. Visibility in tule fog is usually less than an eighth of a mile (about 600 ft or 200 m) but can be much lower. Visibility can vary rapidly; in only a few feet, visibility can go from 10 feet (3.0 m) to near zero.
Fog contributes to transportation accidents and is a significant life safety hazard. These accidents can cause multiple injuries and deaths and could have serious implications for human health and the environment if a hazardous or nuclear waste shipment were involved. Other disruptions from fog include delayed emergency response vehicles and school closures.
In 2018 the NWS in Hanford, California developed the Experimental Fog Severity Index in conjunction with the NWS issues fog advisories to help give motorists advance warning of fog events. A dense fog advisory is issued when widespread dense fog develops, and visibilities drop to one-quarter of a mile or less. The Fog Severity Index has five levels with level 5 being the most severe. Figure 4-24 describes each level of the Index.
Figure 4-24 National Weather Service Experimental Fog Severity Index Level3
Level2
Source: NWS
Moderate Risk For Transportation
Visibility Half Mile Or Less
S1ow Traffic Ahead
Moderate RJsk For Fog Related Accidents
Low Risk For Transportation
Visibility One Mile Or Less
Traffic May Slow Below Speed Limit
Low Risk For Fog Related Accidents
2021-2026 Update Page 4-102
349
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Past Occurrences
The NCEI records 102 dense fog events in the Central San Joaquin Valley that impacted Merced County between 2000 and 2020 (refer to Table 4-52 above). The following are descriptions of three events of record in the NCEI Storm Events Database:
• November 14 - 20 2002 - Following the very substantial rain for the 3-day period from the 7th through the 9th of the month, high pressure aloft built and resided over Interior Central California.
This weather regime, quite conducive to dense morning fog formation, established itself between the 10th and 13th, and maintained itself through the end of the month. The fog was especially widespread from the 14th through the morning of the 21st. Numerous vehicle accidents occurred due to the extremely poor visibilities on Central and Southern San Joaquin Valley roadways. On the 20th along a 3-mile stretch of Highway 99 just north of the Merced-Madera County Line, 50 trucks and cars were involved in multi-vehicle pileups.
• December 1-5, 2002 - With the large rainfall amounts on the San Joaquin Valley floor by November 9th, haze and fog prevailed subsequently for a 30+-day period while the adjacent foothills, mountains, and Kern Desert dried again in rainless conditions. Widespread dense fog from mid to late-November ceased by the morning of the 1st of December on the Valley floor. But patchy dense fog and haze prevailed from the 1st of the month through the 9th before the major precipitation in December began on the 13th. The morning of the 5th had some very dense, but again patchy fog. A 9-vehicle pile-up occurred near Los Banos in Merced County (CAZ89) on Highway 152 around 8:35 AM PST that killed one and injured three others.
• January 10, 2019 - Visibility below a quarter mile was reported in Fresno, Madera, Merced and Atwater. Several school districts either had delayed openings or delayed morning bus service. A head on crash in dense fog near Atwater at 6:12 PST caused one fatality and three injuries.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Likely --Based on the NCEI data, 102 dense fog incidents over a 20-year period equates to a major fog event every 5.1 years and a 20 percent chance of a major fog event in any given year. It is likely that minor fog events will continue to occur annually in the Merced County planning area.
Climate Change Considerations
California's winter tule fog has declined dramatically over the past three decades, raising a red flag for the state's multibillion-dollar agricultural industry, according to researchers at UC Berkeley. Crops such as almonds, pistachios, cherries, apricots and peaches go through a necessary winter dormant period brought on and maintained by colder temperatures. Tule fog that descends upon the state's Central Valley between late fall and early spring, helps contribute to this winter chill. "The trees need this dormant time to rest so that they can 1
later develop buds, flowers and fruit during the growing season," said biometeorologist and study lead author Dennis Baldocchi. "An insufficient rest period impairs the ability of farmers to achieve high quality fruit yields." The findings have implications for the entire country since many of these California crops account for 95 percent of U.S. production, the authors noted. The researchers paired NASA and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration satellite records with data from a network of University of California weather stations, covering 32 consecutive winters. There was a great deal of variability from year to year, but on average, the researchers found a 46 percent drop in the number of fog days between the first of November and the end of February. Climate forecasts suggest that the accumulation of winter chill will continue to decrease in the Central Valley. Tule fog was also less prevalent in recent years in part due to the multi-year drought. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-103
350
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Based on historic information, the primary effect of fog has not resulted in significant damages to property, or the losses are typically covered by insurance.
People
Reduced visibility is the greatest risk to people when heavy fog is prevalent. Particularly when fog is dense, it can be hazardous to drivers, mariners and aviators and contributes to numerous accidents each year. To reduce injury and harm, people should avoid driving when dense fog is prevalent, if possible. If driving is pertinent, emergency services advise driving with lights on low beam, watching for California Highway Patrol (CHP) pace vehicles to guide through fog, avoiding stopping on highways, and avoiding crossing traffic lanes.
Critical Facilities
Fog can have devastating effects on transportation corridors in the County. Multi-car pileups have resulted from drivers using excessive speed for the conditions and visibility.
These accidents can cause multiple injuries and deaths and could have serious implications for human health and the environment if a hazardous or nuclear waste shipment were involved. Other disruptions from fog include delayed emergency response vehicles and school closures.
Economy
Economic impacts due to dense fog are generally related to road closures leading to a decrease in travel to businesses. Other economic impacts relate to property damages to vehicles from accidents. As shown in Table 4-52 above there is a recorded $1,060,000 of property damages as a result of dense fog all of which are from traffic accidents in the Central Valley region and the records mention Merced County.
Based on that amount the Merced County region has an estimated average loss expectancy of $10,495 and annualized loss of $1,070,495 due to dense fog events.
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
As referred to in the Climate Change Considerations section, California's winter tule fog has declined dramatically over the past three decades, raising a red flag for the state's multibillion-dollar agricultural industry. Crops such as almonds, pistachios, cherries, apricots and peaches go through a necessary winter dormant period brought on and maintained by colder temperatures and tule fog that descends upon the state's Central Valley between late fall and early spring, helps contribute to this winter chill.
Future Development
Population and commercial growth in the County and outside the County will increase the potential for complications with traffic accidents and commerce interruptions associated with dense fog.
Risk Summary
• Tule Fog season begins in late fall and lasts from winter (November - March). • Between 2000 and 2020 there were 102 dense fog events that impacted Merced County and have resulted in $1,060,000 in property damages, largely due to traffic accidents. • Fog can have devastating effects on transportation corridors. On November 4, 2002, a SO-vehicle collision occurred on Highway 99 near Merced.
• Major fog events in the County are estimated to occur every 5.1 years or a 20% chance in any given year.
• Related Hazards: Hazardous Materials Incidents
2021-2026 Update Page 4-104
351
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard tdentification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-56 Hazard Risk Summary - Dense Fog
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Dos Palos Extensive Highly Likely Critical High City of Gustine Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Livingston Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium City of Los Banos Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium City of Merced Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-105
352
4.2.9 Severe Weather: Heavy Rain
Hazard/ Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Most of the adverse weather experienced in Merced takes place in the winter months as heavy rain and thunderstorm events sometimes accompanied by high winds, dense fog events. Dense fog is profiled under 4.2.8 and high winds and tornado events are profiled in 4.3.10.
Merced's weather is influenced by the Pacific Ocean and routine climate patterns such as El Nino. El Nino is the warm phase of the El Nino-Southern Oscillation, a pattern found in the tropical Pacific when there are fluctuations in temperatures between the ocean and atmosphere. During El Nino, the surface winds across the entire tropical Pacific are weaker than normal and the ocean surface is at above-average temperatures in the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (L'Heureux 2014). El Nino typically develops over North America during the winter season causing the severe winter storms the County often experiences. This climate pattern occurs every few years and brings with it above-average rain and snow across the southern region of United States, especially in California.
Atmospheric rivers, another climate pattern that leads to adverse weather in the County, are responsible for up to 50 percent of California's precipitation annually and 65 percent seasonally (Arcuni 2019). An atmospheric river (AR) is a long, narrow region of the atmosphere, like a river in the sky, that transports most of the water vapor outside of the tropics. ARs can be 300 miles wide, a mile deep and more than 1,000 miles long and carry an amount of water vapor roughly the same as the average flow of water at the mouth of Mississippi River (NOAA, 2015). Warm water storms over the Pacific Ocean lead to evaporation and create a high concentration of moisture in the air. While prevailing winds create the distinctive river shape, which is often compared "to a fire hose pointed at California" (Arcuni 2019). When an atmospheric river reaches land, it releases the water vapor in the form of rain or snow. Atmospheric rivers play an important role in the global water cycle and are closely tied to both water supply and flooding risk.
Research suggests that atmospheric rivers contributed to the collapse of both Oroville Dam spillways in February 2017 (NASA Global Hydrology Resource Center), as well as the winter flooding in 1861-1862, which completely inundated Sacramento and is considered the worst flood event in California's history (Ingram 2013). When an atmospheric river forms in the tropical regions of the Pacific near Hawaii it is known as a "Pineapple Express". This type of atmospheric river can produce as much as five inches in one day (NOAA, 2018). In 2018 two Pineapple Express ARs hit California causing significant heavy precipitation events throughout state.
Geographic Area
Thunderstorms are generally expansive in size. The entire county is susceptible to any of the effects of a severe thunderstorm, including heavy rain.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
The heavy precipitation events that Merced County and all of California experiences is often the result of an atmospheric river. Atmospheric rivers are categorized by a unit of measurement known as the Integrated Water Vapor Transport (IVT}, which takes into account the amount of water vapor in the system and the wind that moves it around. For a storm to be classified as an atmospheric river it has to reach an IVT threshold of 250 units; 1,000 IVT or more is considered to be "extreme" (Arcuni 2019). In 2019 a system for categorizing the strength and impacts of atmospheric rivers was developed by the Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes (CW3E), out of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego. The newly developed scale ranks ARs into five categorizes from weak to exceptional.
Unlike the Fujita Scale for tornadoes that focuses on potential damages, the AR scale accounts for both storms that may be hazardous and storms that can provide benefits to the local water supply. A category 202 1-2026 Update Page 4-106
353
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
one AR is considered to be primarily beneficial, generally lasting only 24 hours and produces modest rainfall. While a category five AR is considered "exceptional" and primarily hazardous, lasting for several days and associated with heavy rainfall and runoff that may cause significant damages. Table 4-56 below describes the scale further. The CW3E developed the scale as a tool for officials with an operational need to assess flooding potential in their jurisdictions before the storms makes landfall.
Table 4-57 Atmospheric River Categories
Category Potential Impacts
AR Cat 1: Weak Primarily beneficial. For example, a Feb. 2, 2017 AR hit California, lasted 24 hours at the coast, and produced modest rainfall.
AR Cat 2: Moderate Mostly beneficial, but also somewhat hazardous. An atmospheric river on Nov. 19-20, 2016 hit Northern California, lasted 42 hours at the coast, and produced several inches of rain that helped replenish low reservoirs after a drouaht.
AR Cat 3: Strong Balance of beneficial and hazardous. An atmospheric river on Oct. 14-15, 2016 lasted 36 hours at the coast, produced 5-10 inches of rain that helped refill reservoirs after a drought, but also caused some rivers to rise to just below flood staae.
AR Cat 4: Extreme Mostly hazardous, but also beneficial. For example, an atmospheric river on Jan. 8-9, 2017 that persisted for 36 hours produced up to 14 inches of rain in the Sierra Nevada and caused at least a dozen rivers to reach flood staoe.
AR Cat 5: Exceptional Primarily hazardous. For example, a Dec. 29, 1996 to Jan. 2, 1997 atmospheric river lasted over 100 hours at the Central California coast. The associated heavy precipitation and runoff caused more than $1 billion in damaqes.
Source: Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego. Scale was developed by F. Martin Ralph Director of CW3E in collaboration with Jonathan Rutz of NWS In both February 2018 and 2019 the West Coast experienced six atmospheric rivers. But as the following figure from the Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes shows, California experienced vastly different precipitation totals due to the location of where the atmospheric river made landfall as well as each atmospheric river's IVT. Using the AR scale developed by CW3E, the ARs in February 2019 were all considered to be moderate to extreme and concentrated more on California, resulting in heavy precipitation.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-107
354
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-25 Atmospheric River Strength and Land Distribution, February 2018 vs. February 2019 50"N - - 50°N ·
February 2018 Feb.16 February 2019 i -~ j 47~
451)
45°N ~<'5
4 00 ;5QN -
J80
360
3,10
320 f~b ti
40°N ~ ♦ ''!-'··'piljl ~,. ,~ 300 J .,:,tJ · II ,(' · ;0°N -· 280 260
l JO ftt> t
?20 I
200 ltil.lo
35°N ,. 1 '(l\:.'-.::11.1 180 15°N ~
160
1.\0
120 f;b 17 Raljlll/CWJlAII $1ftll&lh Salt , -......I 00 _ ........... I we.~:,\fl' ./lO•SOOl;"' '$ ' \ '--..i 1 I WcaHIM'iO-SOO!«ffl' 1\ '
1 ' • \ 80 0 . 30°N , \ • 60 10 N -i !14.!trll~·l\'T,~•JSOii!J,o 1,' ,&,Z \ \ ' M('dtti1" l\'f. S(ll)../~0 It m 'I : ' ' I "\:-,_ ' \ .
I Slror;: l\'T-/lO•l(il(l~gl'I ·1 · 1 ~ {\ JO I S~0<>t·IVM'i0-lil00kt.,-1,' ' '\, 1.\ ! I .}-i \.., ,0 I •-~ \. 11 hi!<""• IV!•l~~-1'1(llg111 , • •, '. , L IO I I bl•-.lvt'clOOO-l?SOq;"" '• - ~ \ I.' '-•, I ~ I l "-, \,, j I lxcl'O:ION~ 111>12SihJm , . ~ , '-. 1 ,001 mm ' I hcrot...,i;•M>llSOia,,··1. ... J .. . _w·~d o·, \,. I • 0 t ri::, ' bJ .. ,_,;c .. •;· ,-i~ . 0,1 ) \. , 25°N "~'-" ~-· - , •• , •• ,, I 50N -4
' - \ I. . ' '
145°W 140°W 135°W 130CW 125°W l20°W 115°W 1W'W 140°W l35°W 130°W 125°W 120°W 115°W 110°W 105( Source: Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego 2021-2026 Update Page 4-1 08
355
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Past Occurrences
Heavy rains and adverse storms occur in the Merced County primarily during the late fall and winter but have a chance of occurring in every month of the year. According to information obtained from the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) the majority of precipitation is produced by storms during January and other winter months. Precipitation during the summer months is in the form of rain showers and is rare.
The NCEI records show heavy rainstorms can cause both widespread flooding which can lead to extensive localized drainage issues. In addition to the flooding that often occurs during these storms, strong winds, when combined with saturated ground conditions, can down very mature trees. Refer to the Flood section for more information related to flooding events in the county. There have been two USDA disaster designations (2016, 2019) for excessive rainfall in Merced County (refer to Table 4-4).
Information from the three representative weather stations introduced in subsection 4.3.6 Severe Weather: General are summarized below and in Figure 4-26 and Figure 4-27.
Northeastern Merced County - Merced Municipal Airport Weather Station (1899-2016) Information from the closest weather station with the most comprehensive data to represent the northeastern county area, the Merced Municipal Airport Weather Station, is summarized below in Figure 4-26 and Figure 4-27. Average annual precipitation recorded at this weather station is 12.27 inches per year. The highest recorded annual precipitation was 21.66 inches in 1998; the highest recorded precipitation for a 24-hour period is 2.20 inches on January 30, 1911. The lowest recorded annual precipitation was 5.50 inches in 1947.
Figure 4-26
,,..,
• C
....
....
2.5 2
1.5 1
0.5 Merced Municipal Airport Weather Station Monthly Average Total Precipitation (Period of Record 1899-2016}
MERCED AP, CALIFORNIA (045532)
Period of Record: 06/01/1899 to 06/09/2016
Jar. Mar Ma!;! Jul Sep Nov
Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct
Day of Year
( Average Total Monthl!;I Precipitation
Dec
J
Mes:tel"l'l
Re9iol'lal
Cli .... te
Cel'ltel"
Source: WRCC, www.wrcc.dri.edu/
2021-2026 Update Page 4-109
356
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-27 Merced Municipal Airport Weather Station Daily Precipitation Average and Extreme {Period of Record 1899-2016)
..... • C
....
.....
MERCED AP, CALIFORNIA (045532)
Period of Record: 86/81/1899 to 86/89/2816
2.2 f ---· ---·- 21 ----- -1..
n,I ~
q
·· '------·.l. .
o.s I
o.e. I
o.+ I
0.2 I
0 f''.'~"l'''.•""'--"••••••~~,_..:Ll\.l.!u...llllJlll...lull'U!,lt:!!J.!.:-!,.._,.....-...,..,,,-.JP"-._,...,_.'l"'I Jan 1 Mar 1 Ma!:J 1 Jul 1 Sep 1 Nov 1 Dec 31
Feb 1 Apr 1 Jun 1 Aug 1 Oct 1 Dec 1
Day of Year
( --Extreme -- Average
Source: WRCC, www.wrcc.dri.edu/
Southwestern Merced County - Los Banos City Weather Station (1906-2016) J
Mester-1"1
Re9iol"lid
Cli1V1C1te
Cel"lterInformation from the closest weather station with the most comprehensive data to represent the southwestern county area the Los Banos Weather Station, is summarized below in Figure 4-28 and Figure 4-29. Average annual precipitation recorded at this weather station is 9.19 inches per year. The highest recorded annual precipitation was 21.08 inches in 1998; the highest recorded precipitation for a 24-hour period is 2.40 inches on January 18, 1914. The lowest recorded annual precipitation was 4.61 inches in 1947.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-110
357
Figure 4-28
.... 2
• C
""" .... 1.5
C
0 """ ~ 1 ~ "'
""" Cl.
""" (,) 0.5
II,)
L.
~
0 Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Los Banos Weather Station Monthly Average Total Precipitation (Period of Record 1906-2016)
LOS BANOS, CALIFORNIA (045118)
Period of Record: 83/81/1986 to 06/18/2016
Jan Mar Ma~ Jul Sep Nov Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct
Day of Year
( Average Total Monthl~ Precipitation
Dec
J
Mestet"ro
Regiorocil
ClililClte
Cerotel"
Source: WRCC www.wrcc.dri.edu/
Figure 4-29 Los Banos Weather Station Daily Precipitation Average and Extreme (Period of Record 1906-2016)
.... • C
""" ....
C
0 """ ~
~ "'
""" Cl.
""" u
II,)
L.
~
LOS BANOS, CALIFORNIA (045118)
Period of Record: 03/01/1986 to 86/10/2016
2.4 .--~-------------------------~
2.2 2,
1.8 I
1.G I
1.4 l
1.2 I
1 l
0.8 I
n.e. I
1).4 I o.! I
Jan 1 Mar 1 Ma!::! 1 Jul 1 Sep 1 Nov 1 Dec 31
Feb 1 Apr 1 Jun 1 Aug 1 Oct 1 Dec 1
Day of Year
( --Extreme -- Average J
Mestet"ro
Re9ioroG1l
ClifilClh
Cerotel"
Source: WRCC, www.wrcc.dri.edu/
2021 -2026 Update Page 4- 111
358
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The NCEI Storm Events Database records 23 heavy rain events in Merced County between 1998 and 2018.
Note no heavy rain events are recorded in the database after 2018. No casualties are recorded for any of the events. As noted above there is a connection between heavy rain events and flooding and is it assumed that the property damages listed in the NCEI database are the results of flooding caused by heavy rain events.
The following table show the records collected from the NCEI Strom Events Database for heavy rain.
Table 4-58 Heavy Rain Events in Merced County, 1998-2018 Location Date Property Damages ($) Crop Damages ($)
Merced 2/1/1998 $2,000,000 $1,400,000
Merced 5/1/1998 $0 $10,200,000
Merced 5/15/2000 $0 $100,000
Merced ARPT 12/13/2002 $0 $0
Merced 4/21/2003 $7,500 $0
Countywide 5/1/2003 $0 $2,000,000
Countvwide 12/7/2004 $0 $0
Countywide 12/27/2004 $0 $0
Countvwide 1/1/2005 $0 $0
Countywide 1/7/2005 $0 $0
Countvwide 1/24/2005 $0 $0
Merced 2/15/2005 $0 $0
Merced ARPT 3/22/2005 $0 $0
Dos Palos/Atwater 9/20/2005 $0 $0
Countvwide 1/1/2006 $0 $0
Countywide 3/2/2006 $0 $0
Livinqston 3/28/2006 $0 $0
Countywide 4/2/2006 $0 $1,960,000
Merced 2/23/2010 $0 $0
Gustine 12/11/2014 $0 $0
Atwater Muni ARPT 4/27/2016 $0 $0
Santa Nella, Los Banos, 5/5/2016 $0 $0 Brito
Creqan 4/16/2018 $0 $0
Total $2,007,500 $15,660,000
Source: NCEI
Probability of Future Occurrences
Highly Likely- Based on the NCEI data, 23 heavy rain incidents over a 20-year period equates to a major event every 1.2 years and an 87 percent chance of a major heavy rain event in any given year.
Climate Change Considerations
As average temperatures increase over time, this generally will result in higher extreme temperatures and more warming in the atmosphere can trigger climate changes, which could result in more frequent extreme weather events. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers have also found that atmospheric rivers will reach the West Coast more frequently (Gao 2015). Currently, the west receives rain or snow from these atmospheric rivers between 25 and 40 days each year. By the end of this century, days on which the atmospheric rivers reach the coast could increase by a third, or between 35 and 55 days a year.
202 1-2026 Update Page4-112
359
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The Merced County planning area experiences a rainy season in the winter months through early spring.
These winter storms can include significant precipitation. The primary effect of these storms has not resulted in significant injury or damages to people and property, or the losses are typically covered by insurance. It is the secondary hazards caused by weather, such as floods, that have had the greatest impact on the County. Damage and disaster declarations related to adverse weather have occurred and will continue to occur in the future. Heavy rain and thunderstorms are the most frequent type of severe weather occurrences in the County. Utility outages, downing of trees, debris blocking streets and damage to property can be a direct result of these storm events. Given the nature of these types of storms, the entire County is potentially at risk.
People
Exposure is the greatest danger to people from heavy rain events. People can be caught in rising waters and need to be rescued.
Critical Facilities
Because of the unpredictability of heavy rain events, most critical facilities and infrastructure that is above ground is equally exposed to the storm's impacts. Due to the random nature of this hazards, a more specific risk assessment was not conducted for this plan.
Economy
Economic impact of a heavy rain event is typically short-term. Generally, long-term economic impacts center more around hazards that cascade from a heavy rain even such as flooding .
In general, all severe weather poses a risk to agriculture economy in the county. Table 4-58 below describes the crops losses related to heavy rain events and associated indemnity amounts or loss payments from the USDA, RMA in the past 13 years. Merced County experiences an estimated $249,076 annualized loss due to crop damages from heavy rain events.
Table 4-59
Vear
2007
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total
Crops Loss Due to Heavy Rain, Risk Management Agency Crop Indemnity Reports, 2007-2020
Net Indemnity Determined
Acres Amount
354.18 $189,228
1,639.58 $1,464,029
4,173.48 $2,055,617
584 $280,280
1,475.48 $359,758
354.6 $106,905
3,545 $1,916,895
3,303.7 $2,974,961
1,742.3 $2,473,741
4,920.1 $3,936,051
766.47 $682,953
6,741 .8 $4,983,748
781 .8 $743,567
30,382.49 $22,167,733
Source: USDA RMA
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-113
360
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
As a natural process, the impacts of most heavy rain events by themselves are part of the overall natural cycle and do not cause long-term consequential damage.
Future Development
New critical facilities, such as communication towers should be built to withstand heavy rain damage.
Future development projects should consider adverse weather hazards at the planning, engineering and architectural design stage with the goal of reducing vulnerability. Stormwater master planning and site review should account for buildings to withstand heavy rain events considered for all new development.
Thus, development trends in the County are not expected to increase overall vulnerability to the hazard but all development will be affected by adverse weather and storm events and population growth will increase potential exposure.
Risk Summary
• During the 20-year period of 1998-2018 there were 23 heavy rain events in Merced County. • Average annual precipitation ranges from 9.19 inches the southern portion of the County to 12.27 inches the northern portion.
• The County experiences an estimated $249,076 annualized crop loss due to heavy rain events. • Related Hazards: Flooding, Landslide
Table 4-60 Hazard Risk Summary - Heavy Rain
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Dos Palos Extensive Highly Likely Critical High City of Gustine Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Livingston Extensive Highly Likely Critical High City of Los Banos Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium City of Merced Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium
202 1-2026 Upda1e Page 4-114
361
4.2.1 OSevere Weather: High Wind/Tornado
Hazard/ Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
High winds, often accompanying severe thunderstorms, can cause significant property and crop damage, threaten public safety, and have adverse economic impacts from business closures and power loss.
Windstorms in Merced County are typically straight-line winds. Straight-line winds are generally any thunderstorm wind that is not associated with rotation (i.e., is not a tornado). It is these winds, which can exceed 100 mph that represent the most common type of severe weather and are responsible for most wind damage related to thunderstorms. These winds can overturn mobile homes, tear roofs off houses, topple trees, snap power lines, shatter windows, and sandblast paint from cars. Other associated hazards include utility outages, arcing power lines, debris blocking streets, dust storms, and an occasional structure fire.
Tornadoes are another severe weather hazard that can affect the Merced County planning area.
Tornadoes form when cool, dry air sits on top of warm, moist air. Tornadoes are rotating columns of air marked by a funnel-shaped downward extension of a cumulonimbus cloud whirling at destructive speeds of up to 300 mph, usually accompanying a thunderstorm. Tornadoes are the most powerful storms that exist. They can have the same pressure differential that fuels 300-mile-wide hurricanes across a path only 300-yards wide or less.
Geographic Area
Wind and tornadoes have the potential to happen anywhere in the County. The resulting damage from wind and tornado events may be most severe in the downtown areas of incorporate communities where there are more large trees, infrastructure, and higher density development.
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) collects data on wind resources in the United States to help determine the location of new wind energy sites. Figure 4-30 from the NREL Wind Prospector webviewer shows the average annual wind speed in Merced County at the height of 100 meters. The eastern and central portions of the County have average wind speeds between 4.50 meters/second and
5.50 meters/second. The wind speeds in the western portion of the County vary greater than the eastern portions. Average wind speeds in western Merced County range from less than 4.00 meters/second to
7.00 meter/second in northwest.
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-115
362
Figure 4-30
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Merced County Average Annual Wind Speed at 100 meters
Land-Based Wind Speed
100m {meters/second)
f2 ■ 400--150
f2 ■ 45C--5G,J
f2 ■ SW-55~
f2 SSG-HO
eot'-1$5~
f2 65iJ-70G
f2 700-"5('
f2 750-80~
f2 8.00-&5()
f2 SSO-Sw
f2 900-95ll
f2 ■ 950- 1000
f2 ■ > 100()
Source: NREL Wind Prospector
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
High winds and tornadoes can cause damage to property and loss of life. While most tornado damage is caused by violent winds, most injuries and deaths result from flying debris. Property damage can include damage to buildings, fallen trees and power lines, broken gas lines, broken sewer and water mains, and the outbreak of fires. Agricultural crops and industries may also be damaged or destroyed. Access roads and streets may be blocked by debris, delaying necessary emergency response.
In 2007, the NWS began rating tornadoes using the Enhanced Fujita Scale (EF-scale). The EF-scale is a set of wind estimates (not measurements) based on damage. Its uses three-second gusts estimated at the point of damage based on a judgment of eight levels of damage to the 28 indicators listed in Table 4-60.
These estimates vary with height and exposure. Standard measurements are taken by weather stations in open exposures.
Table 4-60 describes the EF-scale ratings versus the previous Fujita Scale used prior to 2007 (NOAA 2007).
Table 4-61 The Fujita Scale and Enhanced Fujita Scale
Fujita Scale Derived Operational EF-Scale
Fastest¼ 3-second 3-second 3-second gusts
F Number mile (mph) gust (mph) EF Number gust (mph) EF Number (mph} 73-112 79-117 86-109 86-110
202 1-2026 Update Page 4-116
363
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Fujita Scale Derived Operational EF-Scale
Fastest¼ 3-second 3-second 3-second gusts
F Number mile (mph) gust (mph) EF Number gust (mph) EF Number (mph) 2 113-157 118-161 2 110-137 2 111-135
3 158-207 162-209 3 138-167 3 136-165
4 208-260 210-261 4 168-199 4 166-200
5 261-318 262-317 5 200-234 s Over 200
Source: NWS. Notes: EF - Enhanced Fujita F - Fujita mph - Miles per Hour Figure 4-31 illustrates the potential impact and damage from a tornado.
Figure 4-31 Potential Impact and Damage from a Tornado
Source: NOAA NWS, Storm Prediction Center
The damaging effects of wind speed are measured using the Beaufort Wind Scale as shown in Table 4-61 below. This scale only reflects land-based effects and does not take into consideration the effects of wind over water.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-117
364
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-62 Beaufort Wind Scale
Wind Speed
(mph) Description - Visible Condition
0 Calm; smoke rises vertically
1-4 Light air; direction of wind shown by smoke but not by wind vanes 4-7 Light breeze; wind felt on face; leaves rustle; ordinary wind vane moved by wind 8-12 Gentle breeze; leaves and small twigs in constant motion; wind extends light flag 13-18 Moderate breeze; raises dust and loose paper; small branches are moved 19-24 Fresh breeze; small trees in leaf begin to sway; crested wavelets form on inland water 25-31 Strong breeze; large branches in motion; telephone wires whistle; umbrellas used with difficulty 32-38 Moderate gale whole trees in motion; inconvenience in walking against wind 39-46 Fresh gale breaks twigs off trees; generally, impedes progress 47-54 Strong gale slight structural damage occurs; chimney pots and slates removed 55-63 Whole gale trees uprooted; considerable structural damage occurs 64-72 Storm very rarely experienced; accompanied by widespread damage 73+ Hurricane devastation occurs
Source: NWS
Based on NCEI records between 1955 and 2019 there have been a combined 36 strong wind/high wind/thunderstorm winds and 32 tornado/funnel cloud events in Merced County which has resulted in a total of $1,925,800 in property damage. The most damaging event took place on January 20, 2010 and was a 59-mph wind event that resulted in $750,000 in property damages. Overall, high wind event impacts would likely be limited, with a majority of impacts being related to property damages caused my downed trees as well as power outages.
In the past 65 years all the tornado events that have taken place in Merced County have been between F0-F1 or EF0 tornadoes. However, it should be noted that, although unlikely, larger tornadoes could occur.
Should the County be hit by an EF-3 or higher tornado, it can be extrapolated that because of its relative size and the potential size and length of a tornado's path a significant portion of the County could be impacted, resulting in property and crop damage and loss of life.
Tornado impacts to the County would likely be negligible, with less than 10 percent of the planning area affected by events in the EF0-2 range, though stronger tornadoes are possible. The impact to quality of life or critical facilities and functions in the affected area would depend on where the tornado occurred.
Injuries or deaths are possible due to wind thrown trees or property damage caused by wind events.
Overall, impacts from high wind and tornado events would likely be negligible, with less than 10 percent of property severely damaged and shutdown of facilities due to loss of power for 24 hours or less.
Past Occurrences
During the rainy season, the Merced planning area is prone to relatively strong thunderstorms, sometimes accompanied by high winds and tornadoes. While tornadoes do occur occasionally, most often they are of F0/EF0 intensity. The NCEI Storm Events Database does not record any F2, or F3 or anything events greater than EF0 events that have occurred in the planning area in the past. Table 4-62 Past High Wind and Tornado Events contains incident descriptions for significant historic events. In addition to the events listed in the NCEI database, there was a USDA disaster designation declared for Merced County in 2016 for "severe weather including excessive rainfall and high winds" (refer to Table 4-4). 2:02 1-2026 Update Page 4-118
365
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-63 Past High Wind and Tornado Events in Merced County, 1955-2019 Property Crop
Hazard Type Date Location Magnitude Damages Damages Deaths Injuries ($) ($)
Tornado 4/18/1955 Merced County Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Thunderstorm
7/6/1957 Merced County 70mph $0 $0 0 0 Wind
Tornado 4/22/1967 Merced County F1 $0 $0 0 0
Tornado 4/5/1975 Merced County F0 $25,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 3/4/1978 Merced County F1 $250,000 $0 0 1
Tornado 2/19/1986 Merced County F0 $25,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 3/26/1991 Merced County F0 $0 $0 0 0
Thunderstorm
6/15/1995 Merced/Dos Palos Unknown $50,000 $3,000,000 0 0 Wind
Thunderstorm 4/1/1996 Los Banos/Gustine 80mph $320,000 $100,000 0 0 Wind Tornado 4/1/1996 Merced F0 $10,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 11/22/1996 Merced F1 $45,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 11/13/1997 Los Banos F0 $5,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 2/14/1998 Los Banos F0 $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 3/25/1998 Atwater/Livingston/ Unknown $0 $0 0 0 Merced Funnel Cloud 3/28/1998 Plainsburq Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 4/5/1998 Dos Palos/Los Unknown $0 $0 0 0 Banos Funnel Cloud 1/31/1999 Merced Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hioh Wind 1/10/2001 Countywide Unknown $20,000 $0 0 4
Hiqh Wind 5/2/2001 Countywide 57mph $75,000 $1,960,000 0 0 Hiah Wind 8/29/2001 Santa Nella Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind 11/24/2001 Countywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hiah Wind 12/2/2001 Countywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind 3/13/2002 Countywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hioh Wind 6/8/2002 Countywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind 6/9/2002 Countrywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
High Wind 8/3/2002
Los Banos Muni Unknown $0 $0 0 0 ARPT
Stronq Wind 12/14/2002 Countywide 49mph $0 $0 0 0
StronQ Wind 12/16/2002 Countywide 36mph $5,000 $0 0 0
Tornado 12/16/2002 Merced ARPT F1 $400,00 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 12/19/2002 Countywide 46mph $5,000 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 12/28/2002 Countywide 34mph $4,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 5/3/2003 Atwater/Merced/ Unknown $0 $0 0 0 Livinqston Strong Wind 2/25/2004 Countywide Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 10/17/2004 Countvwide 40mph $0 $0 0 0
Strong Wind 10/19/2004 Countywide 41 $1,000 $0 0 0
Strano Wind 1/7/2005 Countywide 36 mph $10,000 $0 0 0
High Wind 1/7/2005 Countywide 57.4 moh $150,000 $150,000 0 0 Funnel Cloud 3/20/2005 Los Banos Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Strong Wind 3/22/2005 Countywide 40 mph $5,000 $0 0 0
2021-2026 Update Page 4-119
366
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Property Crop
Hazard Type Date Location Magnitude Damages Damages Deaths Injuries ($) ($)
Tornado 4/8/2005 Ballico F0 $25,000 $50,000 0 0
Funnel Cloud 4/8/2005 Gustine Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 1/18/2006 Gustine/El Nido Unknown $0 $0 0 0 Funnel Cloud 3/28/2006 Merced Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Tornado 3/28/2006 Atwater/Merced/ F0 $25,000 $0 0 0 Merced ARPT Funnel Cloud 4/14/2006 Atwater Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Strona Wind 9/8/2006 Countvwide 40 mph $1,000 $0 0 0
Thunderstorm 10/29/2007 Cregan 55 mph Wind $60,000 $0 0 0 Strona Wind 2/23/2008 Countvwide 39 mph $0 $12,000 0 0
Stronq Wind 5/31/2008 Countywide 30 mph $500 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 6/10/2008 Countywide 39 mph $200 $1,000 0 0 Stronq Wind 6/26/2008 Countywide 33 mph $1,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 1/25/2009 Stevinson Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Tornado 2/9/2009 Merced ARPT EF0 $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind 1/20/2010 Countvwide 59 mph $750,000 $0 0 0
Strong Wind 3/6/2012 Countywide 36 mph $35,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 4/12/2012 Atwater Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 3/2/2014 Dos Palos Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 12/11/2014 Countvwide 48 mph $0 $500,000 0 0 Stronq Wind 3/5/2016 Countvwide 35mph $100 $0 0 0
Strona Wind 2/1/2017 Countywide ·30 mph $1,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 3/21/2017 Castle AFB Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Hiqh Wind 12/16/2017 CountyWide 51 mph $0 $0 0 0
Strong Wind 1/6/2019 Countvwide 43 mph $16,000 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 1/17/2019 Countywide 30 mph $1,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 3/27/2019 Livinaston Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Stronq Wind 4/9/2019 Countywide 39 mph $5,000 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 5/21/2019 Los Banos Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Funnel Cloud 11/28/2019 El Nido Unknown $0 $0 0 0
Total $1,925,800 $5,773,000 0 s
Source: NCEI Storm Events Database, Notes: mph - Miles per Hour, ARPT -Airport, AFB - A1rforce Base Figure 4-32 and Figure 4-33 show the location of the past wind and tornado events in Merced County based on data from NOAA's NWS Storm Prediction Center.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-120
367
Figure 4-32 Merced County Wind Events (1950 -2019)
STANISLAUS
Map compiled 312021; ~ood intended for planning purposes only. '"'' • Data Source: Merced County, NOAA.
National \Neather Service SVRGIS 2019
0 5
FRESNO
10 Mies
1....1
Merced Coun!'{ Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
MARIPOSA
MADERA
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
•
•
Beaufort Scale (Wind Speed)
• Calm <1 knots
• Storm 48 - 55 knots
e Violent Storm 56 - 63 knols
e Hurricane 64+ knots
® Urban Communilies
Cities
N
A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-121
368
Figure 4-33 Tornado Events in Merced County, 1950 -2019
STANISLAUS
,,
"
,,.,,.l
\,
SANTA CLARA
...,-\
Map compiled 3/2021 :
"£'"'Od intended for planning purposes only. ~U , Data Source: Merced County, NOAA.
NaUonal Weather Service SVRGIS 2019
• 01·s-----orn1s~2lff&
2015
[.ulw
fo.-.emite
2002
1Vss (:} - -...... e-~~u Q:,
. J:r;:mkli~-1/\n".i..l' ..... 140,'
0 1957
a' s:;: e 1998
~9 ,
~ ·f . " ~
0 l
FRESNO
10 MIies
L..J
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Miti_g_ation Plan 2006
MARIPOSA
MADERA
2000
c.'J
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
2019
• ✓
2019
•
Tornado Events (1950-2007)
Intensity (Fujita Scale)
e F0
O F1
Tornado Events {2008,2019)
Intensity (Enhanced Fujita Scale)
& EF0
& EF1
@ Urban Communnies
..-----, Cnies
'II
A
2021-2026 Update Page 4-122
369
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Probability of Future Occurrences
Highly Likely - Sixty-eight high wind and tornado events have occurred in Merced County over 64 years of record keeping, which equates to one high wind or tornado event every 1.1 years, on average, and a 94 percent chance of a high wind or tornado event occurring in any given year. Historical wind activity within the planning area indicates that the area will likely continue to experience high wind during thunderstorm events with a potential of the formation of funnel clouds and low intensity tornadoes during adverse weather conditions. The actual risk to the County is dependent on the nature and location of any given thunderstorm or tornado event.
Climate Change Considerations
There presently is not enough data or research to quantify the magnitude of change that climate change may have related to tornado frequency and intensity. NASA's Earth Observatory has conducted studies that aim to understand the interaction between climate change and tornadoes. Based on these studies meteorologists are unsure why some thunderstorms generate tornadoes and others don't, beyond knowing that they require a certain type of wind shear. Tornadoes spawn from approximately one percent of thunderstorms, usually supercell thunderstorms that are in a wind shear environment that promotes rotation. Some studies show a potential for a decrease in wind shear in mid-latitude areas. Because of uncertainty with the influence of climate change on tornadoes, future updates to the mitigation plan should include the latest research on how the tornado hazard frequency and severity could change. The level of significance of this hazard should be revisited over time.
As for wind, studies referenced in California's Fourth Climate Assessment indicated that extreme fire weather, particularly in the form of hot and dry winds, can strongly influence shrub-land fire regimes.
Strong winds have also been now associated with severe forest fires in California meaning climate change impacts on wind patterns may also affect forest health and wildfire susceptibility. Lastly, other ongoing research compiled in the recent climate assessment has resulted in different conclusions on the effect of climate change on wind regimes, particularly extreme wind events, such as the Santa Ana and Diablo winds that created some of the most devastating wildfires (California Natural Resources Agency 2018a). At this time, these changing factors are not well understood and are still being incorporated into state and regional research and risk analysis.
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
General damages are both direct (what the wind event physically destroys) and indirect, which focuses on additional costs, damages and losses attributed to secondary hazards spawned by the event, or due to the damages caused by the wind event. Depending on the magnitude of the wind events as well as the size of the tornado and its path, a tornado is capable of damaging and eventually destroying almost anything.
Construction practices and building codes can help maximize the resistance of the structures to damage.
Secondary impacts of damage caused by wind events often result from damage to infrastructure. Downed power and communications transmission lines, coupled with disruptions to transportation infrastructure, create difficulties in reporting and responding to emergencies. These indirect impacts of a wind event put tremendous strain on a community. In the immediate aftermath, the focus is on emergency services.
Downed trees caused by a wind event are a common occurrence in the County. Falling trees can cause significant damage to property and put people at risk. Due to multiple years of drought in the County, many trees in the area have been impacted making them more susceptible to blow-down during wind events.
2021-2026 Update Page 4 123
370
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
People
Community members are the most vulnerable to high wind and tornado events. The availability of sheltered locations such as basements, buildings constructed using tornado-resistant materials and methods, and public storm shelters, all reduce the exposure of the population. However, there are also segments of the population that are especially exposed to the indirect impacts of high winds and tornadoes, particularly the loss of electrical power. According to the data obtained from emPower.com, a website maintained by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 4%, or 1,412 of the 36,689 of the Medicare beneficiaries in the County rely on medical equipment that is dependent on electricity in order to live independently. These populations include the elderly or disabled, especially those with medical needs and treatments dependent on electricity. Nursing homes, community-based residential facilities, special needs housing facilities, and isolated communities are also vulnerable because of life support needs if electrical outages are prolonged, since backup power generally operates only minimal functions for a short period of time.
Following the unprecedented 2018 wildfire season in California, PG&E announced it will be conducting PSPS when there are high winds and dry conditions and generally a heightened fire risk forecasted. The outages could last several days, and PG&E has suggested customers be prepared for outages that could last longer than 48 hours. A majority of Merced County could be affected by the power outages.
Critical Facilities
Both winds and tornadoes may impact exposed critical infrastructure such as power lines; depending on the impact and the function, this could cause a short-term economic disruption. The most common problems associated with tornadoes and high winds are loss of utilities. Downed power lines can cause power outages, leaving large parts of the county isolated, and without electricity, water, and communication. Damage may also limit timely emergency response and the number of evacuation routes.
Downed electrical lines following a storm can also increase the potential for lethal electrical shock.
Damaging winds can also cause wildfires; refer to the Wildfire section for more information on the County's vulnerability to wildfires.
In an effort to mitigate the impacts of PSPS, the State of California has allocated PSPS Resiliency funds for counties, cities, tribes and state agencies to "procure fixed, long-term emergency electrical generation equipment, develop continuity plans, risk assessments for critical infrastructure, post event reports, and public education material or supplies to prepare of electric disruption" (Cal OES 2021). In fiscal year 2019- 20 Merced County was allocated $422,987 from the PSPS Resiliency Allocation to counties, to purchase and install generators at County fire stations, backup generators and lighting infrastructure for the Merced County Operations Areas and purchase a battery-powered backup Public Safety Answering Point for all dispatch centers within the Merced County Operational Area.
Economy
Winds typically don't have long-term impacts on the economy, although wind does have an impact on the agriculture economy in the county. As shown in Table 4-63, wind events have been a leading cause of crop loss in the past three years (2007 - 2019), resulting in over $2 million in loss payments from the USDA and more than 3,000 acres lost to high wind events. Merced County experiences an estimated $187,255 annualized loss due to crop damages from excessive wind events. 202 1-2026 Update Page 4-124
371
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-64 Crops Loss Due to High Wind, Risk Management Agency Crop Indemnity Reports, 2007-2019
Vear Net Indemnity Determined
Acres Amount
2007 372.4 $97,945
2008 327.02 $130,399
2012 32.4 $2,159
2013 1,624.8 $1,267,860
2014 176 $171,649
2015 301.9 $75,625
2016 7.4 $11,792
2017 398.68 $303,600
2019 298 $186,034
Total 3,539 $2,247,063
Source: USDA RMA
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
High winds and tornadoes can cause massive damage to the natural environment, uprooting trees and other debris. This is part of a natural process, however, and the environment will return to its original state in time.
Future Development
As the County continues increase in population, the number of people and housing developments exposed to the hazard increases. Adherence to current building codes, coupled with proper education on building techniques and the use of sturdy building materials, attached foundations, and other structural techniques may minimize the property vulnerabilities. Public shelters at parks and open spaces may help reduce the impacts of tornadoes and high wind events on the recreational populations exposed to storms.
Risk Summary
• Between 1955 and 2019 there were a combined 68 high wind (36) and tornado (32) events in the County.
• Wind and tornado events have resulted in $1,925,800 in property damages. The most damaging event took placed on January 20, 2010 with 59 mph wind causing $750,000 in property damages. • Excessive wind has caused 3,539 acres to be lost and $2,247,063 crop loss payment made by the USDA to farmers in the County.
• PSPS pose a risk to individuals in the County who depend on electricity to live independently. Four percent of Medicare Beneficiaries in the County are electricity dependent. • Related Hazards: Extreme heat, Heavy Rain, Agriculture/Pest and Crop Disease, Wildfire 2021-2026 Update Page 4-125
372
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-65 Hazard Risk Summary - High Wind/Tornado
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Atwater Extensive Highly Likely Critical High
City of Dos Palos Extensive Highly Likely Critical High City of Gustine Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium
City of Livingston Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium City of Los Banos Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium City of Merced Extensive Highly Likely Limited Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-126
373
4.2.11 Subsidence
Hazard/Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Land subsidence is defined as the vertical sinking of the land over natural or manmade underground voids. Subsidence is common in several areas of California, usually as a result of groundwater pumping, peat loss, or oil and gas extraction. Fluctuations in the level of underground water caused by pumping or by injecting fluids into the earth can initiate sinking to fill the empty space previously occupied by water or soluble minerals. Weight, including surface developments such as roads, reservoirs, and buildings, and manmade vibrations from such activities as blasting and heavy truck or train traffic can accelerate the natural processes of subsidence, or induce subsidence over manmade voids.
The 2018 California SHMP profiles subsidence as a secondary impact of drought. Through reduced availability of surface water, groundwater pumping in order to meet water needs. According to a study published by Yale Environmental Review, approximately 1 million people in the San Joaquin Valley rely on groundwater pumping for drinking water, and thousands of farmers rely on groundwater to irrigate crops.
While groundwater pumping occurs in both drought and non-drought years to support urban, rural, and agricultural water needs, the 2018 California State HMP notes that it is greatly increased during dry years.
Land subsidence due to groundwater pumping can permanently damage or collapse underground aquifers, increase flood risk in low-lying areas, and pose hazards to buildings, infrastructure, and water storage facilities.
Subsidence can result in serious, localized structural damage to buildings, roads, irrigation ditches, canals, streams, underground utilities, and pipelines. It can disrupt and alter the flow of surface or underground water. The consequences of improper use of land subject to ground subsidence can be excessive economic losses, including the high costs of repair and maintenance for buildings, irrigation works, highways, utilities, and other structures. This results in direct economic losses to citizens as well as indirect economic losses through increased taxes and decreased property values.
Geographic Area
Figure 4-34 below shows areas statewide that have a recent history of subsidence or are known to be at an increased risk of subsidence. Most studies and concern about land subsidence in California have focused on the Santa Clara Valley, San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento Valley, Antelope Valley, Coachella Valley, and Mojave River Basin Areas.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-127
374
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
---------- Figure 4-34 Historic Land Subsidence in California Re<ent and Hlstorital Land Subsident~
ll port-' Sllhsal•nt• lowi..n' \¥11• ...... of SUbl.doit1'•1 ■ ~f<1<nt;111)11~~ 0 .... ~, ,.,1,tjtj,,<Y.,.
■ iti\10'•.ili ~ 1'4.Ul! "-CllVdoai,... C:::, ""'''""'"' •M ,.,.,..,,1 JuiMO.,o ~ 1:1 Hl.'tO-"t:.»"-':lllli<ul
H)'droioq,c !leg,on 8(,.,r>dary
Cout11y ll,:,und•I)
M.:.;l>I' !i1ghw11y
Moj<ir C.,.01
..... ""
"
■ ;!li\OrlUI illllSl:linQI
C.oitlillUOUI GPS $'!Illian
CulltU:latw• Su bllftll<•'
D Q. < lll'llh
Ci) l Bmchll,.
l~ ~~
,;ru r . ..-. I
: •'~••h ?.-n•~
Ul,l--~!Ji,.ft.4rutt, /hllr.to:C1.u.r-~~;u;~IUJJ.Y#llt1 a~ 'lr.:~• •• ~rr-,•11.ar..,,1Jf P.,\.1.tnt91,, f~t.'I' ~lf!'A! hr.fi:W'liCII., ll!a.'. f,. .. ,.,J-,, r.d~ 2'JMl•JC1~ w,e.'•,w rhttl':lWlw~ ~-~.,_.,.wm,a ""'""""" r>.,,,,.. • .r.,...;;,.:t,. ~cl')),, (•,:l,,,t:t~ #"'~ .t.Jkd ;.'jH'O#b r ~,..,,,..~ f,/~"D'lf-4., w..b0t"'\~t'1ot"'flt\1t•~c,,ei-trw1!fi/O/ t'C..1b",.1~b1; fttM'Wl'~""'Q.1t, ~ Wltn,.:.~• ll9'1"'~b>ei11S:at.»>TC:ale<"_,..1c,·-:,d,,,d/;,, 11\~""< Source: California DWR, November 2014 Public Update for Drought Response MM liAMtOlll'll«
smion ltencl >
.A SIJW!li~
.\. N,,l wtl\illng
Ul\lnQ\\!l
E\tlmated Potential
for Future lMd Subsidence~
ln&ufttCtfflt 0.t•
The Merced Subbasin GSA has a focused map of subsidence in the vicinity of Merced County, shown in Figure 4-35 below. This agency was created for the purpose of forming a joint powers agency that will be the GSA for a portion of the Merced Groundwater Subbasin. The Merced Subbasin GSA developed and adopted the Merced Groundwater Sustainability Plan in December 2019. The implementation of plan will address the SGMA requirements and achieve the sustainability goals outlined in SGMA, in addition to positive impacts to future subsidence in the County.
20?. 1-2026 Update Page 4-128
375
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-35 Merced County Area Subsidence
SanJoH
llorg.n
HNI
0.11&:ll.ltce
I Cort:cnnllft9nt USOSC.1'111' .. Yilllly'SpllClalO.abne 201.t 2 ...-i1~•l.SC(.llotd'lfflaodC.tptrlltf201◄
3 A.....-9~~a-R* per10Q1M1 ~1 201!
Re..-..d02'1M'OIS
lrllofrntllOl'lo,,.plt~lubjlldlOCNngo wnlhout ~
Source: Merced County
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
Merced Area Subsidence
Wlltrford
MapRiver>
l ~ Local Cities
D Corcoran Extent
0 Recent SubMlencei
CJ County Bound.mes
Avera a- Annual 3
Subsidence Rate
() 15 loC::>ftfyt
0to0.15 trlyr
-0. IStoO IVyr
-03to-0 151Cyr
-045!o-03ft.ltr
-06I0 •045ft.t'yr
.().75to-06nly,
A lack of data makes it difficult to predict the magnitude of future land subsidence incidents in Merced County. As shown in Figure 4-35 above, most of the documented land subsidence in the county has been of 0.5 feet or less per year. Much of this subsidence is continuous and occurs gradually over a vast area of the county. However, that can still be enough to cause structural issues. Sudden and localized subsidence events, such as sinkholes, can cause damage to building foundations, roadways, and utilities. Such events have been documented in nearby Fresno and Madera counties, where sinkholes or sudden subsidence has damaged and closed roads. Ongoing displacements of as much as 12" per year have been documented in other parts of the state. As areas of the county continue to gradually sink, the impacts on infrastructure may become more apparent.
Previous Occurrences
While actual effects of subsidence are visible throughout the County, research on the hazard produced thus far has not produced records of any specific events. Some areas of the County have subsided 10-15 feet over the past 50 years according to the HMPT.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Land subsidence has been a recurring issue in Merced County for decades and can be expected to continue in the future. The frequency of future land subsidence incidents in the county will largely be dependent on the mitigation actions and pumping regulations initiated by the state, the county, and local regulations. Based on past trends of gradual subsidence throughout the entire San Joaquin Valley and the 2021-2026 Update Page 4-1 29
376
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
continued dependence on groundwater pumping, it can be assumed that subsidence will continue in the future, with increased rates of subsidence coinciding with drought years.
Climate Change Considerations
The most likely impact that climate change will have on land subsidence risk is the potential for extended and severe drought, which could likely result in more groundwater pumping and human-induced subsidence. During periods of drought, water levels may be drawn too low, which results in an irreversible compaction of aquifers. The water cannot recharge the layers, causing permanent subsidence and diminishment of groundwater storage capacity.
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
The lack of detailed data on land subsidence in Merced County makes it difficult to quantify past or potential future losses. Most subsidence instances result in relatively minor damage and settling of buildings. But in some cases, subsidence can result in serious structural damage to buildings, roads, irrigation ditches, underground utilities, and pipelines, potentially resulting in the complete loss of the structure. Subsidence can also disrupt and alter the flow of surface or underground water, as well as reducing the future capacity of aquifers.
People
This hazard typically results in property damage, not risk to human life. In the event of a sudden sinkhole, it would be possible for people to sustain injuries if they were walking or driving and were caught in the sinkhole.
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Linear infrastructure (roads, buried pipelines) tends to have the most risk to land subsidence. Statewide, subsidence has caused damage to dams and levees, canals, roads and bridges, water and sewer lines, pipelines, well casings, and aircraft runways, in addition to a variety of buildings and other structures.
Highways 59 and 152 traverse areas of historic subsidence in the County. The threat to the California Aqueduct has been identified as a significant concern for the state. Evidence of the gradual impacts of subsidence on infrastructure in the San Joaquin Valley can be seen in Figure 4-36 below. This image was taken from the California Water Foundations Summary Report on Land Subsidence from Groundwater Use in California. The bridge shown is over the Outside Canal north of Mendota, California. While it is partially submerged in this image, the bridge used to have canal inspections by the Central California Irrigation District staff conducted from a boat passing under the bridge. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-i30
377
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-36 Evidence of Gradual Land Subsidence, Partially Submerged Russell Avenue Bridge, Mendota, CA
Economy
Damage resulting from land subsidence can cause direct economic losses in the form of needed structural repairs to affected buildings and facilities. It can also result in indirect losses, such as from increased taxes and decreased property values. Subsidence may impact tourism and shipping industries if transportation routes are affected.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
Historic and cultural facilities are just as susceptible to subsidence related damage as other structures.
However, there is not sufficient data to identify specific historical or cultural facilities at increased risk from this hazard.
Groundwater pumping can cause significant impacts to underground water resources, and the resulting subsidence events may further disrupt and alter the flow of surface or underground water, in a cyclical pattern of environmental degradation. Furthermore, soil compaction resulting from subsidence can permanently reduce aquifer capacity, impacting water supplies long into the future.
Future Development
The areas of the county which have experience the greatest historic rates of subsidence are largely in the middle of the county, which is occupied by the Merced National Wildlife Refuge, San Luis National Wildlife Refuge, and Great Valley Grasslands State Park. As such, future development of these areas will be significantly restricted, and growth will be limited. While vulnerability to this hazard is not anticipated to increase with new development, increased water pumping resulting from the demand of new development has the potential to increase the frequency and severity of subsidence. This could be 2021-2026 Update Page 4-131
378
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
especially important in Los Banos, given that area has higher subsidence potential. Increased efforts to monitor and manage groundwater pumping, increased accuracy of mapping, and emphasis on appropriate grading and ground compaction during development will help alleviate vulnerability for future development in unknown areas of risk.
Risk Summary
While a significant portion of Merced County is at risk from ongoing land subsidence, the gradual nature of this hazard makes the overall significance of this hazard low. • The gradual nature of land subsidence incidents limits their overall impact, in terms of property damage, at the county level.
• The entire San Joaquin Valley is vulnerable to land subsidence, and Merced County is vulnerable due to its dependence on agriculture and groundwater pumping. • There is a shortage of data on specific occurrence of this hazard in Merced County. Most studies on land subsidence in California have focused on the Santa Clara Valley, San Joaquin Valley, Sacramento Valley, Antelope Valley, Coachella Valley, and Mojave River Basin Areas, however there is not extensive information on individual subsidence events.
• Increased drought conditions resulting from climate change has the potential to result in more groundwater pumping, which could lead to more human-induced subsidence; groundwater sustainability planning and management could help offset future subsidence. • Land subsidence can alter the flow of surface or underground water, an impact that may not be noticed until long after the fact.
• Related Hazards: Drought
Table 4-66 Hazard Risk Summary - Subsidence
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Likely Negligible Low
City of Atwater Limited Occasional Negligible Low
City of Dos Palos Limited Occasional Negligible Low
City of Gustine Limited Unlikely Negligible Low
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Negligible Low
City of Los Banos Limited Likely Negligible Low
City of Merced Limited Occasional Negligible Low
2021-2026 Update Page 4-132
379
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
4.2.12Wildfire
Hazard/Problem Description
A wildfire is an uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels, posing danger and destruction to property and watersheds. While wildfires are often the direct result of lightning strikes, they can be caused by downed powerlines or mechanical equipment or are the result of human activities like landscape debris burns, carelessness, or arson. Wildfires often start in undeveloped areas and public land areas, such as state and federal lands, but can spread to urban areas where structures and other human development are more concentrated. The predominant dangers from wildfires are:
• Injury or loss of life to people in the affected area; and • The destruction of vegetation, property, wildlife.
Communities throughout California are increasingly concerned about wildfire safety as increased development in the foothills and mountain areas and subsequent fire control practices have affected the natural cycle of the ecosystem. Wildfire risk is predominantly associated with wild land-urban interface areas, a general term that applies to development adjacent to landscapes that support wildfire. However, significant wildfires can also occur in heavily populated areas.
Merced County is exposed to a variety of wildfire hazard conditions that varies based on fuels, topography, weather, and human behavior. CAL FIRE, as required by government code 51181, has undertaken a statewide program to map areas of potential wildfire severity, and to describe the potential for wildfires to occur in a given area; the resulting Fire Hazard Severity Zones are shown in Figure 4-37 below.
It should be noted that fires are also an important natural component of Merced County's ecosystem.
Wild lands need to burn periodically to naturally maintain viable environments. Fuel maintenance (controlled burns, mowing, cattle grazing, and other means) is a necessary replacement to uncontrolled wild land fires because of threats to human habitation. Development patterns in rural lands can reduce the ability to manage fuel and defend "values at risk".
Generally, there are three major factors that sustain wildfires and predict a given area's potential to burn.
These factors are fuel, topography, and weather.
• Fuel-Fuel is the material that feeds a fire and is a key factor in wildfire behavior. Fuel is generally classified by type and by volume. Fuel sources are diverse and include everything from dead tree leaves, twigs, and branches to dead standing trees, live trees, brush, and cured grasses. Also, to be considered as a fuel source are manmade structures, such as homes and other associated combustibles. The type of prevalent fuel directly influences the behavior of wildfire. Fuel is the only factor that can be modified by humans. The main fuel types in Merced County are crops and grasses, while there are also brush and pine fuels present in some areas in the southwest of the county. • Topography-An area's terrain and slopes affect its susceptibility to wildfire spread. Both fire intensity and rate of spread increase as slope increases due to the tendency of heat from a fire to rise via convection. The arrangement and types of vegetation throughout a hillside can also contribute to increased fire activity on slopes.
• Weather-Weather components such as temperature, relative humidity, wind, and lightning also affect the potential for wildfire. High temperatures and low relative humidity dry out fuels that feed wildfires, creating a situation where fuel will more readily ignite and burn more intensely. Thus, during periods of drought, the threat of wildfire increases. Wind is the most influential weather factor of the three and its influence can increase rates of spread regardless of temperature and relative humidity. 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-133
380
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Geographic Area
Both urban and wildland fires conditions exist in Merced County which increases the chances for damage to property, loss of life and/or injury. In the wildland-urban interface, where development has expanded into rural, higher risk areas, fires can result in major losses of property and structures. In most of Merced County, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) ranks fuel loading as low.
Fuels are mainly crops and grasses. In the southwest corner, there are some brush, pine, and grass fuels, which are ranked as moderate fuel hazards, primarily in the area west of Interstate 5.
Generally, fire season in Merced County extends from early spring to late fall. Onset can happen suddenly due to lightning or human caused factors and wildfires can last from a few hours to a few months, but the likely hood of a large and damaging fire lasting for months in Merced County is not likely. Secondary effects from wildfire include increased erosion, destabilized slopes, degraded air and water quality, and economic impacts from burned landscapes. Urban fires primarily involve the uncontrolled burning of residential, commercial and/or industrial structures generally caused by human activities.
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) assesses the amount and extent of California's forests and rangelands, analyzes their conditions and identifies alternative management and policy guidelines.
CAL FIRE identifies areas that are at high risk of damage from wildfire based primarily on three factors:
• Ranking Fuel Hazards = ranking vegetation types by their potential fire behavior during a wildfire. • Assessing the Probability of Fire = the annual likelihood that a large damaging wildfire would occur in a particular vegetation type.
• Defining Areas of Suitable Housing Density that Would Create Wild land-Urban Interface Fire Protection Strategy Situations = areas of intermingled wildland fuels and urban environments that are in the vicinity of fire threats.
Population density and the presence of structures are not currently used to determine the fire hazard severity for a particular region, although they do have a significant impact on fire behavior.
Based on the above criteria, CAL FIRE maps Fire Hazard Severity Zones for each county as "Very High," "High," or "Moderate". As shown below in Figure 4-37, there are no areas in Merced County classified as Very High and the areas ranked High are primarily located west of Interstate 5. These areas exhibit the combination of vegetative fuel and topography that contribute to an increased fire hazard potential. The fact that an area is in a Moderate Hazard designation does not mean it cannot experience a damaging fire. It only means that the probability is reduced, generally because the number of days a year that the area has "fire weather" is less.
The Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) spatial dataset was explicitly developed for adopting new ignitionresistant building code standards and adopted by the California Building Commission in 2007. It is constructed to describe the nature and probability of fire exposure to structures, including those lands that are highly urbanized, but in close proximity to open wildlands. It is broken into Federal Responsibility Areas, State Responsibility Areas, and Local Responsibility Areas shown below. 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-134
381
Figure 4-37
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Merced County Federal, State, and Local Responsibility Severity Zones MADERA
/// Local
','-· State
Hazard Classes
High
FRESNO
Moderate
Non-Wildland/Non-Urban
Urban Unzoned
Map compiled 312021; 'lu.ood intended for planning purposes only. ff' . Data Source: Merced County, CALFIRE,
Local Responsibility Area. State Responsibility Area
O 10 Miles
l I I I I I I
• Urban Communtties
C]cities
CAL FIRE has also designated the following Merced County communities as being at increased risk from wildfires (https://osfm. fire.ca.gov /d ivisions/wi I dfi re-plan ni ng-eng i neeri ng/fire-plan/commun ities-at risk/):
• Dos Palos
• Gustine
• Los Banos
• South Dos Palos
Some unincorporated communities located within the county are not confronted with a high wildfire risk, due primarily to the dominant type of vegetation in those areas. The low-growing native grasses and shrubs found in these communities present a minimal vegetative fuel source and a corresponding low wildfire risk. In addition, the topography of those areas is mainly level and well developed in both residential and agricultural land uses.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
Vegetation (or fuel) plays a major role in fire behavior and shaping fire hazard potential. Vegetation distribution throughout the county varies by location and topography, with dramatic differences observed between the western, central, and eastern portions of the county. For instance, fire behavior in brush fuel 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-135
N
382
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
types produces higher flame lengths than that in grassland, although spread rates are typically slower. Fire behavior in forests is variable, depending on surface fuel conditions and the presence of ladder fuels.
Fuel loading in developed areas susceptible to wildfire becomes even more complex. The introduction of some ornamental plantings as landscaping and groundcover can dramatically increase the fire loading of a neighborhood. Gazebos, fencing, patios, decks and even the structures themselves add even more fuel.
Once structures become involved in fire, the problem compounds as embers cast out thousands of feet onto combustible roofs well removed from the wildland area.
Steep terrain also plays a key role in the rate at which wildfires spread, as fires will normally burn much faster uphill. Generally, when the gradient of a slope doubles, the rate of spread of a fire will also double.
Steep topography also channels air flow, thereby creating erratic wind patterns. Fire suppression in steep areas is also complicated by limited accessibility, and the effectiveness of firefighters and equipment are hampered by lack of access roads.
Another factor that can increase the severity of wildfires in the county is areas with high percentages of dead trees, as discussed in subsection 4.3.15 Agricultural Pests and Disease.
The Fire Rating System defined in Table 4-66 describes the characteristics and potential intensity of fires, including the effect on the ability to manage and suppress fires. Fire conditions up through Class 5 are possible in Merced County, primarily in the unincorporated areas in the far east and west of the county.
Table 4-67 Fire Danger Rating System
Rating
.'))
CLASS 3: High Danger (H)
COLOR CODE: Yellow
Basic Description
fires not easily
started
fires start easily and
spread at a
moderate rate
fires start easily and
spread at a rapid
rate
fires start very easily
and spread at a very
fast rate
Detailed Description
Fuels do not ignite readily from small firebrands. Fires in open or cured grassland may burn freely a few hours after rain, but wood fires spread slowly by creeping or
smoldering and burn in irregular fingers. There is little dan er of s ottin .
Fires can start from most accidental causes. Fires in open cured grassland will burn briskly and spread rapidly on windy days. Woods fires spread slowly to moderately fast.
The average fire is of moderate intensity, although heavy concentrations of fuel - especially draped fuel -- may burn hot. Short-distance spotting may occur but is not
persistent. Fires are not likely to become serious and
control is relative! eas .
All fine dead fuels ignite readily, and fires start easily from most causes. Unattended brush and campfires are likely to escape. Fires spread rapidly, and short-distance spotting is common. High-intensity burning may develop on slopes
or in concentrations of fine fuel. Fires may become serious and their control difficult, unless they are hit hard and fast while small.
Fires start easily from all causes and immediately after ignition, spread rapidly and increase quickly in intensity.
Spot fires are a constant danger. Fires burning in light fuels may quickly develop high-intensity characteristics - such as long-distance spotting - and fire whirlwinds, when they burn into heavier fuels. Direct attack at the head of such fires is rarely possible after they have been burning more than a few minutes.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-136
383
Rating_~
Source: http://www.wfas.net
Basic Description
fire situation is
explosive and can
result in extensive
property damage
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Detailed Description
Fires under extreme conditions start quickly, spread
furiously and burn intensely. All fires are potentially serious. Development into high-intensity burning will
usually be faster and occur from smaller fires than in the Very High Danger class (4). Direct attack is rarely possible and may be dangerous, except immediately after ignition.
Fires that develop headway in heavy slash or in conifer stands may be unmanageable while the extreme burning
condition lasts. Under these conditions, the only effective and safe control action is on the flanks, until the weather chan es or the fuel su I lessens.
Major wildland fires can completely destroy ground cover. If heavy rains follow a major fire, flash floods, heavy erosion, land subsidence and mudflows can occur. After a wildland fire passes through an area, the land is laid bare of its protective vegetation cover and is susceptible to excessive runoff and erosion from winter storms. The intense heat from the fire can also cause a chemical reaction in the soil that makes it less porous, and the fire can destroy the root systems of shrubs and grasses that aid in stabilizing slope material. These cascading effects can have ruinous impacts on people, structures, infrastructure, and agriculture.
Fire threat provides a measure of fuel conditions and fire potential in the ecosystem, representing the relative likelihood of "damaging" or difficult to control wildfire occurring for a given area. Fire Threat is not a risk assessment by itself but can be used to assess the potential for impacts on various assets and values susceptible to fire. Impacts are more likely to occur and/or be of increased severity for the higher threat classes. Fire threat is a combination of two factors: 1) fire probability, or the likelihood of a given area burning, and 2) potential fire behavior (hazard). These two factors are combined to create five threat classes ranging from low to extreme. Figure 4-38 below shows the wildfire threat areas throughout Merced County.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-137
384
Figure 4-38 Merced County Wildfire Threat Areas
/ STANIS I.AUS
.,
SANTA CLARA
SAN BENITO
FRESNO
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
MADERA
Fire Threat
- Extreme
Very High
High
Moderate
Low
• Urban Communities
LJCities
Map compiled 3/2021;
d intended for plannlng purposes only. woo . Data Source: Merced County, CALFIRE, FRAP Previous Occurrences
0 5 10Miles
I It, I J J JI
There have not been any state or federal disaster declarations in Merced County related to wildfire in the past. The Planning Team noted that although there are many fire starts, the fuels are "flashy" and fires are usually quickly put out. Despite this, there have been 101 wildfires recorded in the county from 1950-2018 totaling 110,893 acres burned. This is an average of over 1,500 acres burned every year. In 2020, a portion of the SCU Lightning Complex Fire, which is the 3rd largest fire by acres burned in state history, extended into Merced County, burning approximately 3,800 acres in the planning area. As stated above, most fires are relatively small compared to the state as a whole, the highest number of acres burned in the county was 19,131 during the 1996 Mercy fire. The county's fire history from 1911-2020 is illustrated in Figure 4-39.
202 1-2026 Update Page4-138
]\
385
Figure 4-39 Merced County Fire History, 1911-2020
STANISLAUS
Map compiled 3/2021 :
d lnte11ded for planning purposes only. WQQ . Data Source: Merced County, CALF IRE, USDA FS. USDI BLM and FWS. NPS, NIFS
Probability of Future Occurrences
Grnsstand
• NWR Complex
\ ·sun LUIS
N~RComplox
Los r Banos 1
FRESNO
0 5 10Mlles
f 1 1 I I I J I
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
---------------
---~ 'Mldfire ClassesfA;res
- B/0.26 - 9.9
MADERA - C/10 - 99
Di 100 - 299
I
El 300-999
F / 1.000 - 4.999
G I 5.000 - 9,999
H / 10,000 - 49,999
- I / 50,000 - 99.999
- J / 100.000 - 499,999
• Urban Communities
Cities
Fire starts are highly likely during each fire season; though, they rarely result in large-scale wildfires in Merced County. Information obtained from the CAL FIRE Redbook lists multiple fires, the largest in the most recent past consumed approximately 3,800 acres. Based on climate and weather in Merced County and the fuels, topography, and a past fire history which indicates an average of 1.5 wildfires per year, it is likely that fires will continue to occur in the future. Figure 4-40 below shows the annual probability for wildfire in Merced County from 2026-2040, based on CAL FIRE GIS mapping. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-139
386
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-40 Merced County Annual Probability of Fire, 2026-2050
STANISLAUS
Si\NTACLARA
SAN BENITO
Map compiled 3/2021; 'Ul.ood inlended for planning purposes only. ff' . Data Source: Merced County, CALFIRE
Climate Change Considerations
MADERA
FRESNO
0 5 10 Miles
I I I I I IP JI
0 • 0.25%
~ 0.25 • 0.29%
r-·: 0.29 . 0.33%
r·-·1 o.33. 0.40%
LJ0.40•0.50%
D o.so. o.67%
r::::-: o.s1 . 1.00%
- >1.00%
• Urban Communities
LJCijies
According to the 2018 California SHMP, climate change has the potential to impact the frequency, size, and severity of the wildfire hazard statewide. Increasing temperatures may intensify wildfire threat and susceptibility to more frequent wildfires in the county.
Exactly how climate change will affect total precipitation is not clear, but models suggest that there is a tendency for wetter conditions in the northern part of the state and drier conditions in the south (California Natural Resources Agency 2018a). Forests are also sensitive to variable precipitation events, as the 2012-2017 drought contributed to widespread tree mortality as warmer temperatures stressed trees and made them more susceptible to pests and pathogens (California Natural Resources Agency 2018).
Studies noted in California's Fourth Assessment report note climate change impacts on wind patterns may strongly affect forests, potentially serving as a trigger mechanism for conversion of forest to other types of vegetation (California Natural Resources Agency 2018).
Current scientific models expect all of California will be affected by increased numbers of forest fires with added intensity due to longer warmer seasons, reduced distribution of biodiversity, lack of moisture, changes in ecosystems, drought impacts (e.g. pest diseases and continued spread of invasive species), and other impacts in coming years. The extending of the wildfire season into winter months, coinciding with seasonal high wind patterns, has contributed to severe fires in recent years. Southern California 2021-2026 Update Page 4-14D
387
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
experienced 29 wildfires in December of 2017 alone, and the deadliest and most destructive fire in California history, the Camp Fire, happened in November of 2018.
Vulnerability Assessment
Merced County vulnerability to wildfires varies, with some areas of the planning area being at greater risk than others as described further in this section. Generally, this hazard is a medium concern. High fuel loads in some areas of the planning area along with geographical and topographical features create the potential for both natural and human caused fires that can result in loss of life and property. These factors, combined with natural weather conditions common to the area, including periods of drought, low relative humidity, and periodic winds, can result in frequent and sometimes catastrophic fires. Even the relatively flat central parts of the county are not immune to fire; hot and sometimes windy weather combined with dry vegetation and a denser population can result in an increase in the number of ignitions.
Figure 4-41 through Figure 4-44 below are the result of a nationwide risk study from the United States Forest Service. These figures provide a perspective of wildfire risk and vulnerability compared to other CA counties. Populated areas in Merced County have, on average, greater risk to homes than 14% of counties in California. Populated areas in Merced County have, on average, greater wildfire likelihood than 18% of counties in California.
2021 -2026 Update Page 4-141
388
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-41 Merced County Wildfire Likelihood
Source: USFS
2021-2026 Update Page 4-142
389
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-42 Merced County Wildfire Likelihood Compared to California Counties Wildfire likelihood Population
Higher Lower H gher
r
(I.I
~
~ •
c,- •• •
Bl
C:
0 1,1
~
~
i
Wildfire likelihood
Source: USFS
2021-2026 Update Page 4-143
390
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-43 Merced County Wildfire Risk to Homes
Source: USFS
2021-2026 Update Page 4-144
391
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-44 Merced County Wildfire Risk to Homes Compared to California Counties Risk to homes in CA Population
µigl er H gher
•
•
•
I 0 0. ' • •
(I)
~ • • ~ __, 0 "' Si ._,
=·•
f_j
r: c·i 8 ()
~
! 0
~ I '
C, • ,,
(\ · t'le•·ced (:)t.intv
Wildfire likelihood
Source: USFS
General Property
The potential impacts of wildfire on property include crop loss, injury and death of livestock and pets, and damage to infrastructure, homes and other buildings located throughout the wildfire risk area.
GIS was used to intersect the parcel boundaries with a master address point layer to obtain the number of buildings per parcel. Only parcels with improvement values greater than zero were used in the analysis, this method assumes that improved parcels have a structure of some type. This data was then overlaid on the Fire Threat Layer. For the purposes of this analysis, the wildfire hazard zone that intersected the address point was assigned as the hazard zone for the entire parcel. It was assumed that every parcel with an improved value greater than zero was developed in some way, thus only improved parcels and their values were analyzed.
An analysis of the value of those parcels - the improvement value plus estimated value of building contents - quantifies the potential losses from wildfires by severity zones. The results show that $3.7 billion worth of property and approximately 8,500 structures are exposed to fire risk countywide. The 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-145
392
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
majority of these buildings are in moderate to low hazard areas. The unincorporated areas and the City of Los Banos make up the majority of this risk. Residential properties constitute more than half of both the number of parcels and the projected losses. The total values shown in these tables include both structure value and contents and can be used as an estimate of potential losses since wildfires typically result in a total loss.
Table 4-68 Wildfire Hazard Exposure -Property Summary by Jurisdiction and Fire Threat Zone Jurisdiction Building Building Building Building Total Improved Estimated Total Value Count Count Count Count Building Value Content Value
Very High Moderate Low Count
High
Atwater 0 1 276 303 580 $158,646,509 $82,890,947 $241,537,456 Gustine 0 0 57 97 154 $26,104,098 $13,904,591 $40,008,689 Livinqston 0 0 59 171 230 $91,308,401 $67,612,796 $158,921,197 Los Banos 0 2 198 976 1,176 $328,297,798 $178,953,729 $507,251,527 Merced 0 1 257 364 622 $156,504,212 $99,657,587 $256,161,799 Unincorporated 108 462 1,605 3,659 5,834 $1,373,680,176 $1,148,731,537 $2,522,411,713 Total 108 466 2,452 5,570 8,596 $2,134,541,194
Source: CAL FIRE, Merced County Assessor, Wood GIS analysis Figure 4-45 Unincorporated Area Buildings in Fire Threat Classes ml
Source: CAL FIRE, Merced County Assessor, Wood GIS analysis People
$1,591,751,186 $3,726,292,380
■ Building Count Very High
■ Building Count High
Building Count Moderate
Building Count Low
Wild land fires result in a high risk for personal injury, loss of life to inhabitants of the fire area and firefighters, and losses of structures and personal property. Wildfires in or near the WUI frequently require emergency evacuation and sheltering, often for many days. As is shown in Table 4-68 below, approximately 17,364 people in Merced County reside in FHSZ. This figure was derived by taking the total number of residential structures identified in the FHSZs and multiplying them by the average household size in the county based off of 2019 U.S. Census Bureau estimates. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-146
393
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-69 Population at Risk to Fire Threat
Jurisdiction Population
Atwater 1,787
Gustine 399
Livinqston 756
Los Banos 4,115
Merced 1,837
Unincorporated 8,469
Total 17,364
Source: Merced County, HIFLD, CAL FIRE, FRAP, U.S. Census Bureau, Wood GIS Analysis Other indirect impacts from wildfires on people are related to dense smoke from fires within the region.
Wildfires in the past three years have decreased the air quality throughout Merced County. Dense smoke poses a risk to both people with compromised health as well as those considered healthy. A study from the University of California San Diego found that wildfire smoke is more harmful to respiratory health in humans than pollution from cars (NPR 2021). Studies have also shown an increase in ambulance calls, hospital visits and an increase of people experiencing respiratory or cardiac emergencies (NPR 2020).
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Critical facilities are those community components that are most needed to withstand the impacts of disaster, as previously described in the Assets section. Wildfire impacts to critical facilities can include structural damage or destruction, risk to persons located within facilities, disruption of transportation, shipping, and evacuation operations, and interruption of facility operations and critical functions.
Critical facilities and infrastructure also create an increased risk for the occurrence of wildfires. Overhead electric transmission lines have been known to spark wildfires. According to data from the California Public Utilities Commission, the state's three largest utility companies collectively reported 2,009 ignitions statewide between 2014-2017, including at least 50 in Merced County. Most of these instances were small, less than one acre in size, however these fires can grow rapidly under the right fire conditions. One such example is California's deadliest wildfire, the 2018 Camp Fire in Northern California. Identifying critical facilities and infrastructure and mitigating their potential risks is important both for maintaining the county's resilience and for reducing the potential impacts of wildfire. The locations of critical facilities identified by HIFLD throughout the county are summarized by their exposure the various wildfire threat levels in Table 4-69 through Table 4-72 below.
Table 4-70 Critical Facilities Within the Low Wildfire Threat by Jurisdiction and FEMA Lifeline Jurisdiction
"' C C 0
; .: 0
rtl cu ·.;:. V .... "' "C "C rtl
'i: rtl ::J C C t: ::J s: 0 iii rtl iii rtl ~ 0 >, ... "C E cu ... ·;: ..c V >, ·- 0. Cl "C .... cu .... :s ....... E "' iii ... Qi rtl ... iii cu ::J C cu 0 N rtl cu ..,_ V f .... 0 C 0 ..c rtl ~ cu ~ rtl cu 0 u w u.. VI J: J: VI VI I- IAtwater 2 6 Dos Palos 0
Gustine 2
Livingston 2 2
2021 -2026 Update Page4-147
394
Jurisdiction
Los Banos
Merced
Unincorporated
Total
Ill
C
0 ·,.:;
Ill
u
'i:
:::I
E
E
0 u
20 23
>,
ei
CII
C
w
18 20
....
CII
...
Ill
3: ... -ti ~ 0 iii
0 ..c u. Ill
2 5
Ill
:::I
0 iii 'E ·;:: ~ ~ Ill Ill
J:2
2 3
5 Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan "C
C
Ill
..C Ill .... u
iii :s CII CII
J: 2
0 Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
"C
C
:. .£' .......
CII :::I .... u Ill CII Ill Ill
2 17
22 C
0 ·,.:;
t!
0 Cl.
Ill
C
I!!
I4
156
162
iii
....
0 I3
8 216
237
Source: Merced County, HIFLD, CAL FIRE, FRAP, Wood GIS Analysis Table 4-71
Jurisdiction
Atwater
Dos Palos
Gustine
Livingston
Los Banos
Merced
Unincorporated
Total
Critical Facilities Within the Moderate Wildfire Threat by Jurisdiction and FEMA Lifeline
Ill
C
0 C
·.:: .: 0 Ill CII ·,.:; u .... Ill "C "C Ill
'i: Ill :::I C C t: :::I 3: 0 iii Ill iii Ill~ 0
E >, ... "C CII ·;:: ..c Cl. Cl ... u >, ·- -c· .... Ill CII ;!:: :s ...... Ill E iii ... iii ... CII :::I C CII 0 N Ill Ill CII .... u Ill ... 0 C 0 ..c Ill 2 CII 2 Ill CII ... 0 u w u. Ill J: J: Ill Ill I- I2 2 0 1
0 0
3 10 10 26 46
10 10 1 0 0 2 29 52
Source: Merced County, HIFLD, CAL FIRE, FRAP, Wood GIS Analysis Table 4-72 Critical Facilities Within the High Wildfire Threat by Jurisdiction and FEMA Lifeline Jurisdiction Ill
C
0 C
.... .... 0 Ill CII .... u .... Ill "C "C Ill
'i: Ill :::I C C t: :::I 3: 0 iii Ill iii Ill~ 0
E >, ...
CII "C •;:: ..c Cl. Cl ... u >, ·- -ti ... Ill CII ;!:: :s ...... Ill E iii ... iii .... CII :::I C CII 0 N Ill Ill CII .... u I!! .... 0 C 0 ..c Ill 2 CII 2 Ill CII 0 u w u. Ill J: J: Ill Ill I- IAtwater 0 Dos Palos 0
Gustine 0
Livingston 0
Los Banos 0
Merced 0
Unincorporated 17 26 24 69
2.02 1-2026 Update Page4-148
395
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Jurisdiction "' C C 0
.:: .: 0
"' Q,I .:: u ... "' "C "C ·2 "' "' :I C C t: :I 3: 0 jij "' jij "' ~ 0 >, .. "C a. E C'I Q,I .. ·;: .c u >, ·- -a ... Q,I ... ~ ..... "' jij E .. "' jij Q,I :I C ai N ... CII 0 "' CII .... u "' ... 0 C 0 .c "' 2 CII 2 "' CII ,_ 0 V w LI. VI ::i:: ::i:: VI VI I- ITotal Source: Merced County, HIFLD, CAL FIRE, FRAP, Wood GIS Analysis Table 4-73 Merced County Critical Facilities Within the Very High Wildfire Threat by Jurisdiction and FEMA Lifeline
Jurisdiction
"' C C 0
·.;:. .: 0
"' CII ·.;:. u ... "' "C "C "' '2 "' :I C C t: :I 3: 0 jij "' jij "' ~ 0 E >, ..
Q,I "C
.. ·;: .c u a. C'I >, ·- -a ... "' Q,I ... ~ ..... "' jij E .. ai ... jij Q,I :I C Q,I 0 N "' Q,I .... u "' ... 0 C 0 .c "' CII "' Q,I .. 0 V w LI. VI ::i:: 2 ::i:: 2 VI VI I- IAtwater 0 Dos Palos 0
Gustine 0
Livingston 0
Los Banos 0
Merced 0
Unincorporated 5 115 4 124
Total 5 115 0 0 0 0 4 124
Source: Merced County, HIFLD, CAL FIRE, FRAP, Wood GIS Analysis According to the analysis conducted, there are over 200 critical facilities exposed to at least a moderate wildfire threat area. The highest rates of exposure to wildfire threat areas are facilities in the Energy and Transportation Lifeline categories, both of which are crucial for response and evacuations in the event of a significant fire.
Economy
The economic impacts of wildfire include loss of property, direct agricultural sector job loss, secondary economic losses to businesses in or near wildland resources like parks and national forests, and loss of public access to recreational resources. Fire suppression may also require increased cost to local and state government for water acquisition and delivery, especially during periods of drought when water resources are scarce.
Effects on agriculture can be significant, which makes up a large portion of Merced County's economy. In addition to the obvious impacts on crops and animals, wildland fire can have damaging effects on soil and water that will impact agriculture for an extended period of time.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
The County has 15 sites listed on the NRHP, and 28 listed on the California Register of Historical Resources. Since these structures are sensitive in nature and may not have been built according to the latest building codes due to their age, it is expected that they might be at risk of wildfires (e.g. because of their potential inability to withstand significant heat). Most of these structures are located in the Cities of 2021-2026 Update Page 4-149
396
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Merced and Los Banos, which are at lower risk to wildfire than unincorporated areas of the county.
However, parks and open spaces, particularly in the foothills in the eastern edge of the county, could also be at risk of a wildfire. This area is the region's gateway to Yosemite National Park, which is a significant historic, cultural, and natural resource for the entire state of California.
Future Development
Any population increases in the Planning Area will continue to make wildfire vulnerability a growing issue, especially as future development expands into higher fire risk areas. These risks can however be managed with strong land use regulations and building code requirements, and with policies established in the Health and Safety Element of the 2030 General Plan. For example, policies requiring fire-resistant vegetation, clustered development, and vegetation clear zones in areas with high and extreme fire hazard.
Risk Summary
The overall significance of wildfire in Merced County is Medium. These events are recurring in nature and can cause significant damage, loss of life, and disruption to critical infrastructure. • The county experiences an average of one wildfire every 1.5 years and an average of 1,500 acres burned per year. As impacts of climate change such as increased temperatures and prolonged drought conditions continue in coming years, this frequency and intensity may increase. • Powerlines and vehicle or equipment use present a significant source of ignitions. • Effects on people: Past wildfires in the county have not resulted in a large number of fatalities; however, significant evacuations and sheltering have been required in past events. • Effects on property: Wildfires can destroy homes, businesses, and critical infrastructure. $3.7 billion worth of property in the County is located in a Fire Threat Zone. • Effects on critical facilities and infrastructure: Wildfires can disrupt access to, or even destroy critical facilities and infrastructure.
• Effects on economy: Wildfires impacts can include loss of property, direct agricultural sector job loss, secondary economic losses to businesses, and loss of public access to recreational resources. • Effects on Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources: Wildfire can significantly impact water and air quality, even at great distances from the area burning. Damage to agriculture, natural resource areas, and habitats are very likely during a wildfire.
• Related Hazards: Drought, Agricultural Pest Infestation and Plant Disease, Landslide and Debris Flow.
Table 4-74 Hazard Summary - Wildfire
Jurisdiction Geographic Probability of Magnitude/ Overall Extent Future Severity Significance
Occurrence
City of Atwater Significant Hiqhly Likely Neqliqible Medium Citv of Dos Palos Limited Highly Likely Negligible Medium City of Gustine Limited Occasional Critical Low
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Negligible Low
City of Los Banos Significant Highly Likely Negligible Medium City of Merced Limited Highly Likely Negligible Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-150
397
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.2.13Hazardous Materials Incidents
Hazard/Problem Definition
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Generally, a hazardous material is a substance or combination of substances which, because of quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics, may either cause or significantly contribute to, an increase in mortality or an increase in serious, irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness. Hazardous materials may also pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed.
Hazardous material incidents can occur while a hazardous substance is stored at a fixed facility, or while the substance is being transported along a road corridor or railroad line or via an enclosed pipeline or other linear infrastructure.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration all have responsibilities relating to the transportation, storage, and use of hazardous materials and waste. The Right to Know Network (RTK NET), maintained by the EPA's National Response Center, is a primary source of information on the use and storage of hazardous materials, as well as data regarding spills and releases. The California Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Toxic Substances Control are authorized by the U.S. EPA to enforce and implement federal hazardous materials laws and regulations within the state. At the local level, Merced County's Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health is the approved CUPA responsible for administration of permitting, inspections, and enforcement for hazardous waste and hazardous materials programs. The CUPA administers the Hazardous Material Business Plan (HMBPs), California Accidental Release Prevention (Cal-ARP) program, and the Aboveground Storage Act, as well as permitting and inspection activities for hazardous waste generators, and onsite hazardous waste treatment facilities, and underground storage tanks.
Hazardous materials can be divided into the following classes:
• Explosives
• Compressed gases: flammable, non-flammable compressed, poisonous • Flammable liquids: flammable (flashpoint below 141 degrees Fahrenheit), combustible (flashpoint from 141 - 200 degrees)
• Flammable solids: spontaneously combustible, dangerous when wet • Oxidizers and organic peroxides
• Toxic materials: poisonous material, infectious agents • Radioactive material
• Corrosive material: destruction of human skin, corrodes steel It is also common to see hazardous materials releases as escalating incidents resulting from other hazards such as floods, wildfires, and earthquakes. The release of hazardous materials can greatly complicate or even eclipse the response to the natural hazards disaster that caused the spill.
The Safety Element of the Merced County General Plan contains goals, policies, and implementation measures pertaining to hazardous materials, including radioactive materials and pesticides. Merced County also has an Emergency Operations Plan which contains provisions to address hazardous materials incidents, such as establishing a Hazardous Materials Unit Leader within the Operations Section and to establish response operations in the event of an incident involving hazardous materials (Merced County Emergency Operations Plan 2017).
Geographic Area
Hazmat incidents can occur at a fixed facility or during transportation. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-151
398
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Fixed Facilities
Hazardous materials facilities are identified and mapped by the counties they are located in, along with the types of materials stored there; facilities generally are located in and around developed areas. The Merced County Office of Emergency Services administers the Emergency Planning and Community Rightto-Know program for the planning area. Under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code and the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, any business storing quantities of hazardous materials greater than 55 gallons of liquid, 500 pounds of solid or 200 cubic feet of some compressed gases must file a HMBP annually that establishes incident prevention measures, hazardous material handling protocols and emergency response and evacuation procedures.
The EPA requires facilities containing certain extremely hazardous substances to generate Risk Management Plans (RMPs) and resubmit these plans every five years. According to the RTK NET, as of April 2021 there are 16 RMP facilities located in the County, as shown below in Figure 4-46.
The California Accidental Release Prevention Program (CalARP) is a statewide initiative to reduce the likelihood and severity of consequences of extremely hazardous materials releases. CalARP requires certain facilities (referred to as "stationary sources") which handle specified chemicals (termed "regulated substances") to take specified actions to proactively prevent and prepare for chemical accidents. Because the CalARP program is implemented at the local government level by the CUPAs, they can work directly with regulated facilities.
Figure 4-46 RMP Identified Hazardous Materials Facilities in Merced County
STANISLAUS
Map compiled 412021; '"OOd intended for planning purposes only. ff' • Data Source: Merced County. USFWS.
HIFLD.EPA
MADERA
FRESNO
0 5 10Miles
I I If t t I I I
EPA Risk Management
Plan Facilities
Waterways
Lakes
•· Local Roads
-- Highways
--Interstate
• Urban Communities
Cities
Counties
National WIidiife Refuge
Grasslands Wildlife
Management Area
2021-2026 Update Page 4-152
399
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Transportation
In transit, hazardous materials generally follow major transportation routes, including road, rail and pipelines, creating a risk area immediately adjacent to these routes. The county's transportation network, primarily Interstate 5, and State Highways 33, 59, 99, 140, 152, and 165, all have the potential for hazardous material incidents. Railroad lines and airports may also transport hazardous materials. The Hazardous Materials and Waste section of the Merced County General Plan Health and Safety Element establishes policies requiring that the transportation of all hazardous materials through the county be coordinated with the CHP (Merced County General Plan, 2013).
Hazardous materials releases can also result from natural disasters, such as floods or earthquakes that may cause containment systems to fail or affect transportation infrastructure. In summary, hazardous material incidents have the potential to occur in business and industrial areas (where fixed facilities are located) and along transportation corridors. Hazardous material incidents can also occur in agricultural areas; these types of facilities typically use pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural chemicals that are harmful to people and the environment. For example, agricultural pesticides and fertilizers are often transported daily around the planning area. Illegal drug operations and dumping sites have also been known to pose a hazardous materials threat.
Lastly, information provided by the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) indicate several pipelines conveying gas or hazardous liquids cross the planning area, these are shown in Figure 4-47 and primarily travel north-south in the vicinity of Interstate 5 and Highway 99. Pipelines ruptures can result in major spills, or even explosions like the ones in San Bruno in 2010, and Fresno in 2015. 2021 -2026 Update Page 4-153
400
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Figure 4-47 National Pipeline Mapping System, Merced County Pipelines Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
• Incidents (Gas)
✓ - Gas Transmission Pipetines
✓ - Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
■ LNG Plants
■ Breakout Tanks
Other Populated Areas {scale
dependent)
Highly Populated Areas {scale
dependent)
Commercially Navigable Waterways
CNVI' Inland
- CNW Ocean/Great Lakes
• Great lakes
• Tribal Government Lands
□ State Boundaries
• Show labels
,:. , County Boundaries
- Show labels
□ GOM Block Groups
• Show labels
r-:; GOM Blocks
- Show Labels
:Map
,f Satellite
Hazardous materials come in the form of explosives, flammable and combustible substances, poisons and radioactive materials. Hazards can occur during production, manufacturing, storage, transportation, use, or disposal. Impacts from hazardous materials releases can include:
• Fatalities
• Injury
• Evacuations
• Property damage
• Animal fatalities (livestock, fish & wildlife)
• Air pollution
• Surface or ground water pollution/contamination
• Interruption of commerce and transportation
Numerous factors influence the impacts of a hazardous materials release, including the type and quantity of material, location of release, method of release, weather conditions, and time of day. This makes it 2021-2026 Update Page4-154
401
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
difficult to predict precise impacts. The impact to life and property from any given release depends primarily on:
• The type and quantity of material released.
• The human act(s) or unintended event(s) necessary to cause the hazard to occur. • The length of time the hazard is present in the area. • The tendency of a hazard, or that of its effects, to either expand, contract, or remain confined in time, magnitude, and space.
• Characteristics of the location and its physical environment that can either magnify or reduce the effects of a hazard.
Cal Fire notes several additional factors that can contribute to the impact of hazardous materials releases from a fixed facility or transportation incident:
• Solid, liquid, and/or gaseous hazardous materials can be released from fixed or mobile containers either accidentally or on purpose.
• The resulting release can last for hours or for days. • The substances released may be corrosive or otherwise damaging over time, and they may cause an explosion and/or fire.
• Contamination may be carried out of the incident area by people, vehicles, water, and/or wind. • Weather conditions will directly affect how the hazard develops. • The micrometeorological effects of buildings and terrain can alter travel and duration of agents. • Shielding in the form of sheltering in place can protect people and property from harmful effects. • Noncompliance with fire and building codes as well as failure to maintain existing fire protection and containment features can substantially increase the damage from a hazardous materials release.
The release or spill of hazardous materials can also require different emergency responses depending on the amount, type, and location of the spill incident.
As noted above, the County contains a number of facilities that store and use significant quantities of hazardous materials. Additionally, a variety of hazardous materials are transported through the County by highway, rail, and pipelines, all of which are potentially vulnerable to accidental spills. Consequences can vary depending on whether the spill affects a populated area versus an unpopulated but environmentally sensitive area.
Potential losses can vary greatly for hazardous material incidents. For even a small incident, there are cleanup and disposal costs. In a larger scale incident, cleanup can be extensive and protracted. There can also be deaths or injuries requiring doctor's visits and hospitalization, disabling chronic injuries, soil and water contamination can occur, necessitating costly remediation. Evacuations can disrupt home and business activities. Large-scale incidents can easily reach $1 million or more in direct damages, with cleanups that can last for years.
Previous Occurrences
Merced County experiences multiple hazardous materials incidents every year. The vast majority of these incidents are minor with very localized impacts.
Table 4-74 breaks down 973 hazardous materials incidents reported to the California OES Warning Center from 2006 through 2021 based on location; this works out to an average of approximately 65 incidents per year. Even this total likely excludes a large number of unreported minor spills. 380 of these incidents occurred in transit, 381 occurred at a fixed location, and the remaining 211 had no location specified.
These hazardous material spills consisted of varying quantities of chemicals, petroleum, gasoline, sewage, and other materials. While the number of incidents can vary considerably from year to year, the average 2021 2026 Update Page 4-155
402
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
number of hazardous materials spills or accidents in the County has trended upwards over the past 15 years. This is in line with the statewide trend, which has seen hazardous materials incidents increase by 30 percent during the same time period.
These incidents include both transportation and fixed facility incidents. This list in no way captures all hazardous material spills within the County, only those that were significant enough to be reported to Cal OES. The data indicates that hazardous materials incidents can occur across the county with a greater frequency in the more developed areas.
Table 4-75 Hazardous Materials Incidents in Merced County by Location, 2006-2021 Location Incidents Location Incidents
Merced 281 Delhi 15
Unknown 183 Winton 14
Atwater 81 EL Nido 11
Santa Nella 70 Le Grand 11
Unincorporated 67 Dos Palos 10
Los Banos 62 Planada 10
Livinqston 55 Stevinson 9
Hilmar 36 Snellinq 5
Gustine 29 Cressey 4
Ballico 17 Tuttle 1
Source: CalOES Spill Release Reporting
The vast majority of these hazardous materials incidents have only minimal life safety impacts. One event in July 2019 resulted in one death and nine hospitalizations after a chemical spill in Los Banos.
Another database maintained by the U.S. Coast Guard reports 205 incidents recorded in Merced County, with 13 of them resulting in confirmed injuries from 1998 to 2013, with 32 individuals injured. There have also been 7 confirmed fatalities in the county from 2000 to 2019. Some incidents may also result in temporary evacuations, closures of transportation routes, or damage to facilities. This translates to roughly 6% of incidents resulting in injuries and 3% resulting in a fatality.
The Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) is a resource for learning about toxic chemical releases and pollution prevention activities by industrial and federal facilities. Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act created the TRI program. According to the TRI database, there were 13 facilities within the County in 2019 that have collectively produced or managed approximately 9.6 million pounds of waste (US EPA 2021). These facilities dispose, treat, recover, and recycle various types of waste and chemicals and ultimately "release" the waste or chemicals into the air or water, or some form of land disposal.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Highly Likely - As discussed above, the County experiences an average of 65 hazardous materials incidents per year, with various degrees of impact; there is effectively a 100 percent chance that the County will see a hazardous materials incident in any given year. However, hazardous materials incidents that cause deaths, injuries, or evacuations are far rarer, occurring in between 3 and 6% of occurrences on average. These can occur at any time and with little predictability given the presence of major transportation routes in throughout the County.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-1 56
403
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Climate Change Considerations
There are no known effects of climate change on human caused hazards, such as hazardous material incidents. However, it is possible that an increase in other hazards, such as severe storms and fire events may increase the likelihood of an accidental hazardous materials release.
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
The impact of a fixed hazardous facility, such as a chemical processing facility is typically localized to the property where the incident occurs. The impact of a small spill (i.e. liquid spill) may also be limited to the extent of the spill and remediated if needed. A blanket answer for potential impacts is hard to quantify, as different chemicals may present different impacts and issues. Property within a half mile in either direction of designated hazardous materials routes are at increased risk of impacts. While cleanup costs from major spills can be significant, they do not typically cause significant long-term impacts to property.
People
Hazardous materials incidents can cause injuries, hospitalizations, and even fatalities to people nearby.
People living near hazardous facilities and along transportation routes may be at a higher risk of exposure, particularly those living or working downstream and downwind from such facilities. For example, a toxic spill or a release of an airborne chemical near a populated area can lead to significant evacuations and have a high potential for loss of life.
In addition to the immediate health impacts of releases, a handful of studies have found long-term health impacts such as increased incidence of certain cancers and birth defects among people living near certain chemical facilities. However there has not been sufficient research done on the subject to allow detailed analysis.
Social Vulnerability
While hazardous material incidents could take place anywhere across the County and may be unpredictable, those living near HazMat facilities or along transportation routes that additionally happen to be socially vulnerable communities would be of highest concern. Based on a combination of the SoVI data presented and discussed in subsection 4.2.1 and the presence of major transportation routes and EPA or CalARP regulated facilities the most vulnerable populations include Merced, Atwater, and Livingston. In addition, agricultural farm workers are most vulnerable to pesticide exposure and other hazardous material incidents associated with the agricultural operation.
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
Impacts of hazardous material incidents on critical facilities are most often limited to the area or facility where they occurred, such as at a transit station, airport, fire station, hospital, or railroad. However, they can cause long-term traffic delays and road closures resulting in major delays in the movement of goods and services. These incidents would be more severe if they result in traffic delays on road closures on any of the designated truck routes or hazardous materials routes in the County. These impacts can spread beyond the planning area to affect neighboring counties, or vice-versa. While cleanup costs from major spills can be significant, they do not typically cause significant long-term impacts to critical facilities.
Economy
The primary economic impact of hazardous material incidents result in lost business, delayed deliveries, property damage, and potential contamination. Large and publicized hazardous material-related events can deter tourists and recreationists too. If incidents occur along major transportation corridors, they can 2021 2026 Update Page 4-157
404
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
temporarily close routes and result in traffic delays. Economic effects from major transportation corridor closures can be significant.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
Hazardous material incidents may affect a small area at a regulated facility or cover a large area outside such a facility. Widespread effects occur when hazards contaminate the groundwater and eventually the municipal water supply, or they migrate to a major waterway or aquifer. Impacts on wildlife and natural resources can also be significant. These types of widespread events may be more likely to occur during a transportation incident, such as a pipeline spill, and can have far reaching and devastating impacts on the natural environment and habitats if they occurred near one of the several wildlife refuges in Merced County.
Future Development
The amount of hazardous materials that are stored, used, and transported across the County are inferred to continue to increase over the next five years based on regional growth trends. As discussed previously, the number of hazardous materials incidents in the County has generally been increasing year to year for the last 15 years and is likely to continue to increase. Future development is also expected to increase the number of people potentially exposed to the impacts of hazardous materials incidents.
Risk Summary
The overall significance of hazardous materials incidents in Merced County is Medium. These incidents occur frequently with little to no warning, both at fixed sites and along transportation routes throughout the County. The possibility of a major spill impacting a major populated area exists; historically the impacts of these incidents on the County as a whole have been fairly limited. • Over the past 15 years, the County experienced an average of 65 hazardous materials incidents per year. This number has generally been trending higher in recent years. Incidents that caused death or injuries were far rarer.
• Of the 972 hazardous material incidents over the past 15 years, 39 percent were transportation related, 39 percent occurred at fixed facilities; the remaining 22 percent have an unreported location. • Several pipelines conveying gas or hazardous liquids cross the County, as shown in the NPMS. • Hazardous materials releases can complicate response to and recovery from natural disasters such as floods and earthquakes.
• Hazardous Materials incidents can cause injuries and fatalities, as well as long-term health problems like increased cancer risks.
• Impacted properties can require cleanup, but the effects are usually localized to the site of the release. • Extended road closures can result in economic losses and impact tourism. • Impacted facilities and infrastructure can require cleanup, but the effects are usually localized to the site of the release.
• Related Hazards include Earthquake, Flood, Fire.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-158
405
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-76 Hazard Summary - Hazardous Materials Incidents Jurisdiction Geographic Probability of Magnitude/ Overall Extent Future Severity Significance
Occurrence
City of Atwater Limited Occasional Neglioible Medium
City of Dos Palos Limited Occasional Neqliqible Medium
City of Gustine Significant Unlikely Critical Low
Citv of Livingston Limited Occasional Neqliqible Medium Citv of Los Banos Significant Likely Critical Medium
City of Merced Limited Likely Negligible Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-159
406
4.2.14Cyber Attack
Hazard Problem/Definition
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
The 2018 California SHMP defines cyber attacks as "attempts by cyber criminals to attack a government, organization, or private party by damaging or disrupting a computer or computer network, or by or stealing data from a computer or computer network for malicious use." Cyber-attacks use malicious code to alter computer operations or data. The vulnerability of computer systems to attacks is a growing concern as people and institutions become more dependent upon networked technologies. The Federal Bureau of Investigation reports that, "cyber intrusions are becoming more commonplace, more dangerous, and more sophisticated," with implications for private- and public-sector networks. Cyber threats can take many forms, including:
Phishing attacks: Phishing attacks are fraudulent communications that appear to come from legitimate sources. Phishing attacks typically come through email but may come through text messages as well.
Phishing may also be considered a type of social engineering meant to exploit employees into paying fake invoices, providing passwords, or sending sensitive information.
Malware attacks: Malware is malicious code that may infect a computer system. Malware typically gains a foothold when a user visits an unsafe site, downloads untrusted software, or may be downloaded in conjunction with a phishing attack. Malware can remain undetected for years and spread across an entire network.
Ransomware: Ransomware typically blocks access to a jurisdiction's/agency's/ business' data by encrypting it. Perpetrators will ask for a ransom to provide the security key and decrypt the data, although many ransomware victims never get their data back even after paying the ransom.
Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack: Perhaps the most common type of cyber attack, a DDoS attack seeks to overwhelm a network and causes it to either be inaccessible or shut down. A DDoS typically uses other infected systems and internet connected devices to "request" information from a specific network or server that is not configured or powerful enough to handle the traffic.
Data breach: Hackers gaining access to large amounts of personal, sensitive, or confidential information has become increasingly common in recent years. In addition to networked systems, data breaches can occur due to the mishandling of external drives.
Critical lnfrastructure/SCADA System attack: There have been recent critical infrastructure Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system attacks aimed at taking down lifelines such as power plants and wastewater facilities. These attacks typically combine a form of phishing, malware, or other social engineering mechanisms to gain access to the system.
The 2018 California SHMP states: "Nationally, cybersecurity incidents such as financial fraud and government database breaches have increased from 5,503 in 2006 to 67,168 in 2014." This is more than a 1200% increase in occurrence over just an 8-year period. As this trend continues and society and government functions become ever more technologically dependent, this hazard is of increasing concern.
In one recent attempt to combat this threat, the State of California adopted Senate Bill 327 in September of 2018. This bill seeks to improve information privacy, specifically pertaining to connected devices.
Existing laws in California require businesses to take all reasonable steps to dispose of customer records within their custody containing personal information and also require businesses that own, license, or maintain personal information about a California resident to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures. SB 327, which went into effect January 1, 2020 further requires the manufacturer of connected devices to equip the device with a reasonable security feature to protect user information (Senate Bill 327).
2021-2026 Update Page 4-160
407
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Geographic Area
Cyber attacks can and have occurred in every location regardless of geography, demographics, and security posture. Incidents may involve a single location or multiple geographic areas. A disruption can have far reaching effects beyond the location of the targeted system; disruptions that occur far outside the state can still impact people, businesses, and institutions within the county. All of Merced County is potentially susceptible to cyber attacks, making the geographic extent significant.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
There is no universally accepted scale to explain the severity of cyber attacks. The strength of a DDoS attack is often explained in terms of a data transmission rate. One of the largest DDoS disruptions ever, the October 21, 2016 Dyn attack, peaked at 1.2 terabytes per second and impacted some of the internet's most popular sites that included Amazon, Netflix, PayPal, Twitter, and several news organizations.
Data breaches are often described in terms of the number of records or identities exposed. The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, a nonprofit organization based in San Diego, maintains a database of data breaches in the United States. The largest data breach ever reported occurred in August 2013, when hackers gained access to all three billion Yahoo accounts. This incident is associated with California in the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse database as the company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. As the location of the headquarters of many large tech businesses and server farms, California as a state is potentially a greater target for cyber attacks. There have been many other instances in the state where millions of records have been breached.
Ransomware attacks are typically described in terms of the amount of ransom requested, or by the amount of time and money spent to recover from the attack. One report from cybersecurity firm Emsisoft estimates the average successful ransomware attack costs $81 million and can take organizations 287 days to recover. Overall, the potential magnitude of a cyber attack can be seen as limited due to the lack of deaths and injuries, but the economic costs can be significant.
Previous Occurrences
The cybersecurity firm Symantec reports there were a total of 1,209 data breaches worldwide in 2016.
While the number of breaches has remained relatively steady, the average number of identities stolen has increased to almost one million per incident. The report also found that one in every 131 emails contained malware, and the company's software blocked an average of 229,000 web attacks every day.
California is by far the state with the highest number of data breaches. The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse database lists 1,338 data breaches against systems located in California, totaling over 5.7 billion impacted records; however, it is difficult to know how many of those affected Merced County residents. Attacks happening outside of the state can also impact local businesses, personal identifiable information, and credit card information.
A 2017 study found ransomware payments over a two-year period totaled more than $16 million. Even if a victim is perfectly prepared with full offline data backups, recovery from a sophisticated ransomware attack typically costs far more than the demanded ransom. However, according to a 2016 study by Kaspersky Lab, roughly one in five ransomware victims who pay their attackers never recover their data.
Recent years have seen an increase in ransomware attacks, particularly against local government systems.
The City of Atlanta was hit by a major ransomware attack in 2018, recovery from which wound up costing a reported $2.6 million, significantly more than the $52,000 ransom demand. A similar attack against the City of Baltimore in 2019 affected the city government's email, voicemail, property tax portal, water bill, and parking ticket payment systems, and delayed more than 1,000 pending home sales. In March 2019, 2021-2026 Update Page 4-161
408
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Orange County, North Carolina was attacked with a ransomware virus, causing slowdowns and service problems at key public offices such as the Register of Deeds, the Sheriff's Office, and county libraries. The attack impacted a variety of county services, including disrupting the county's capability to process real estate closings, issue marriage licenses, process fees or permits, process housing vouchers, and verify tax bills. Each of these past events are examples of the range of risks posed to county and municipal governments by various cyber attacks.
Reports of successful attacks against SCADA systems are less common. In February 2021, a hacker gained system access to a water treatment plant in Oldsmar, Florida and increased the levels of sodium hydroxide to dangerous levels; however, this change was immediately detected by plant staff and corrected.
A large, sophisticated malware attack, known as Olympic Destroyer, was launched against the 2018 Winter Olympics in PyeongChang, South Korea. The attack initially took down servers, email, Wi-Fi, and ticketing systems, which could have severely disrupted the games. Fortunately, the organizing committee had a robust cybersecurity group that was able to quickly restore most functions.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Small-scale cyber attacks such as DDoS attacks occur daily, but most have negligible impacts at the local or regional level. Data breaches are also extremely common, but again most have only minor impacts on government services.
Perhaps of greatest concern to Merced County are ransomware attacks, which are becoming increasingly common. It is difficult to predict the odds of Merced County being hit with a successful ransomware attack in any given year, but it is safe to say it is likely to be attacked in the coming years.
The possibility of a larger disruption affecting systems within the County is a constant threat, but it is difficult to quantify the exact probability due to such highly variable factors as the type of attack and intent of the attacker. Major attacks specifically targeting systems or infrastructure in the County cannot be ruled out.
Climate Change Considerations
There are no known effects of climate induced impacts on cyber attacks.
Vulnerability Assessment
The impact of a cyber attack can vary depending on the type of attack and the intent of the malicious actor. Though a cyber disruption can have limited impacts within a system's own operations, it may cause cascading impacts.
General Property
The vast majority of cyber attacks affect only data and computer systems and have minimal impact on general property.
People
Injuries or fatalities from cyber attacks would generally only be possible from a major cyber terrorist attack against critical infrastructure, such as potable water treatment and delivery systems. If such an event would occur it could indirectly impact the customers served by water utility. More likely impacts to the public are financial losses and an inability to access systems such as public websites and permitting sites. Indirect impacts could include interruptions to traffic control systems or other infrastructure 2021-2026 Update Page 4-162
409
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Data breaches and subsequent identify thefts can have huge impacts on the public. The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) estimates that identity theft alone resulted in $2.7 billion in losses to businesses and $149 million in losses to individuals.
According to the Cyber & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), cyber risks to 9-1-1 systems can have "severe impacts, including loss of life or property; job disruption for affected network users; and financial costs for the misuse of data and subsequent resolution." CISA also compiled a recent list of attacks on 9- 1-1 systems including a DDoS in Arizona, unauthorized access with stolen credentials in Canada, a network outage in New York, and a ransomware attack in Baltimore.
Critical Facilities and Infrastructure
While the vast majority of cyber attacks affect only data and computer systems, sophisticated attacks against utilities and infrastructure sites have occurred. Such attacks typically target the SCADA systems of critical infrastructure, which can potentially result in system failures on a scale equal with natural disasters.
Facilities and infrastructure, such as the electrical grid, could become unusable as a result of a cyber attack. A cyber attack took down the power grid in Ukraine in 2015, leaving over 230,000 people without power. Agencies that rely on electronic backup of critical files are also vulnerable.
The delivery of services can be impacted since governments rely to a great extent upon electronic delivery of services. Most agencies rely on server backups, electronic backups, and remote options for Continuity of Operations or the Continuity of Government. Many departments in the participating jurisdictions have the option to move to a paper method including permitting, DMV services, payments to and from the county, and payroll. However, access to documents on the network, OneDrive access, and other operations that require collaboration across the County will be significantly impacted.
Loss of government servers due to a cyber attack could affect the ability of responders to do their jobs.
Cyber attacks can interfere with emergency response communications, access to mobile data terminal.s, and access to critical preplans and response documents.
The delivery of services can be impacted since governments rely, to a great extent, upon electronic delivery of services. An attack could raise questions regarding the security of using electronic systems for government services.
Economy
Economic impacts from a cyber attack can be debilitating. The cyber attack in 2018 that took down the City of Atlanta cost at least $2.5 million in contractor costs and an estimated $9.5 million additional funds to bring everything back online. The attack in Atlanta took "more than a third of the 424 software programs offline" and recovery lasted more than 6 months. A 2018 cyber attack on the Colorado Department of Transportation cost an estimated $1.5 million. None of these statistics take into account the economic losses to businesses and ongoing IT configuration to mitigate from a future cyber attack.
Historic, Cultural, and Natural Resources
The vast majority of cyber incidents have little-to-no impact on historic, cultural or natural resources. A major cyber terrorism attack could potentially impact the environment by triggering a release of a hazardous materials, or by causing an accident involving hazardous materials by disrupting traffic control devices.
Future Development
Changes in development have no impact to the threat, vulnerability, and consequences of a cyber attack.
Cyber attacks can and have targeted small and large jurisdictions, multi-billion-dollar companies, small 2021-2026 Update Page 4 163
410
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
mom-and-pop shops, and individual citizens. The decentralized nature of the internet and data centers means that the cyber threat is shared by all, regardless of new construction and changes in development.
Risk Summary
The overall significance of cyber attacks in Merced County is Medium. These incidents occur frequently, with California being the state with by far the most reported incidents. The possibility of an attack of any scale impacting the County is almost certain.
• There have been 1,338 data breaches statewide over a 14-year period, averaging approximately 96 incidents per year.
• Nationwide the increase in cyber attacks has been dramatic year over year. As this trend continues it is safe to assume there is a threat to Merced County.
• Injuries and fatalities to people are unlikely, unless in a widescale attack that affected infrastructure and resulted in indirect impacts on communities. People may also be impacted financially. • The vast majority of attacks do not affect property.
• Economic impacts from a cyber attack can be debilitating, sometimes costing local governments millions of dollars.
• The vast majority of attacks target only computer systems, however sophisticated attacks against utilities and infrastructure, such as electrical grids, have occurred.
Table 4-77 Hazard Summary - Cyber Attack
Jurisdiction Geographic Probability of Magnitude/ Overall Extent Future Severity Significance
Occurrence
City of Atwater Limited Occasional Neqliqible Medium
City of Dos Palos Limited Occasional Neqliqible Medium
City of Gustine Limited Unlikely Limited Low
City of Livingston Limited Occasional Neoliqible Medium City of Los Banos Siqnificant Likely Neqliqible Medium
City of Merced Limited Occasional Neqliqible Low
2©21-2026 Update Page4-164
411
4.2.15 Agricultural Pests and Disease
Hazard/ Problem Description
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Located in the Central San Joaquin Valley, Merced County's farming and agricultural industry is ranked as the top agriculture-producing county in California and the country. Agriculture is the dominant land use in Merced County, accounting for more than 90% of all land. According to the Merced County Department of Agriculture, agriculture grossed more than 3 billion dollars in 2019. Top commodities since 2018 included milk, almonds, and cattle (see table below).
Table 4-78 Top 15 Commodities in Merced County in 2018
Rank Change since 2017 Crop 2019 Value Top 15 Share
1 -- Milk $905,116,000
2 -- Almonds $421,254,000
3 Increase Cattle and Calves $297,451,000
4 Decrease Chickens $294,633,000
5 -- Sweet Potatoes $234,946,000
6 -- Tomatoes $126,790,000
7 -- Silaqe - Corn $108,077,000
8 Increase All Nurserv Products $84,515,000
9 Decrease Hay - Alfalfa $69,943,000
10 Decrease Eqos, Chicken $64,668,000
11 Increase Misc. Veqetables $60,709,000
12 -- Graoes - Wine $56,748,000
13 Decrease Cotton - Pima $45,799,000
14 -- Turkeys $43,490,000
15 Increase Pollination $41,284,000
Top 15 Total $2,890,875,000
Source: 2019 Report on Agriculture
Agricultural pests and pathogens (insects, fungi, bacteria, viruses and invasive plants) cause injury or severe destruction to crops or livestock. From exotic fruit flies to noxious weeds, California's agriculture can be impacted by a wide variety of invasive pests and pathogens. These pests pose significant threats to the state's agricultural crops, farm workers, economy, food supply and native habitat. They can also result in increases in food prices for consumers. The number of invasive pests and pathogens newly detected in California and the rest of the United States has increased at alarming rates in recent years, and that trend is projected to continue into the future. Insect pests and diseases, such as bark beetles and Sudden Oak Death in trees can also destroy forests and oak woodland habitat located along the eastern and western perimeters of Merced County, which can in turn increase the fuel load and lead to greater fire risk.
Agricultural disasters could also occur due to severe weather events, such as extreme heat, freeze cycles, and heavy rainfall and these hazards are covered under subsections 4.3.6 through 4.3.10. Drought events are covered under subsection 4.3.2.
The California Food and Agricultural Code mandates pest prevention programs to prevent the introduction and spread of pests in California. These include the Pest Exclusion Program, Pest Detection Program, Pierce's Disease Control Program, and Federal Phytosanitary Certificate Program. Target pests are listed in Table 4-70, but also include dairy, livestock, and poultry pests and diseases, such as Mycobacterium bovis and pathogenic avian influenzas. Animal agriculture, such as dairy farms also result in copious amounts of manure, which contain zoonotic pathogens, which are viruses, bacteria, and parasites of animal origin that cause disease in humans. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-165
31.3%
14.6%
10.3%
10.2%
8.1%
4.4%
3.7%
2.9%
2.4%
2.2%
2.1%
2.0%
1.6%
1.5%
1.4%
412
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Table 4-79 Target Pests in Merced County
Target Pest Insect Hosts Traps Placed
Asian Citrus Psyllid Citrus 620
European Pine Shoot Moth Pine Trees 3
Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter Nurseries/Urban 392
Areas
Liqht Brown Apple Moth Ornamental 288
Melon Fruit Fly Vegetable 95
Gardens
Oriental Fruit Fly Fruit Trees 320
European Corn Borer Corn 5
Gypsy Moth Shade Trees 107
Japanese Beetle Turf, Rose 100
Mediterranean Fruit Fly Fruit Trees 320
Mexican Fruit Fly Fruit Trees 169
Sweet Potato Weevil Sweet Potatoes 120
Source: 2019 Report on Agriculture
Geographic Area
According to the 2017 Census for Agriculture, Merced County contains almost 1 million agricultural acres.
Cropland accounts for 58% of agricultural land, while pastureland accounts for 38%. There are approximately 2,337 farms (as of 2017) in the County.
2021-2026 Update Page4-166
413
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Figure 4-48 Merced County Important Farmland
C 5 ttUh,i
I, a I,,, I
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
IJAOERA
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
r 411tt,l:, 11c uf S'-WW,~~ lrr.i;.,:.,,l.1111:t
" ,u:,IA ;irtr1;1'1C:
C.1:12,1\;'l:tr'IL
=-.armbnrc nft ocal ln(t:rtil"ICr.
Canfi~d A.nima A;riwlh,.ne
""Ofl0f!C:L-fll.,l~I or Ni11ur,al Vt;A!a~t.in
\tocar : ur OitlJIL"'C!d L11:1c
q _,,.. Rt'5•:h•r1ual I ar,:I
Se't' d~11c.·Jtl•Jta1 :itHf Ru:il Co1ru'1!! ~ .JI -t.·1J \ ... "ba., an:1 n,.1ih-Up J an:::
I\__ - Ws:c . .\,ea
Different pests can impact different crops in different ways; while there is no scale to define the extent of an infestation, a pest could have a major economic impact on the value of infested crops.
Another large factor that may influence crop yield is the spread of invasive plants, which may compete with crops for resources and in some cases also introduce pests. According to California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-I PC), invasive plants cost California $82 million every year in control, monitoring and outreach; estimated actual impacts can reach into the billions. Based on the USDA's RMA Crop Indemnity Reports, between 2007 and 2019 (no losses were reported in 2020), there were 734.6 acres lost due to plant disease and insects and $256,962 indemnity payments made.
Past Occurrences
Based on information from the USDA, Merced County received several USDA disaster declarations since 1950 (see Table 4-3 above). All the declarations were associated with flood, drought or severe weather events, and most recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. None were related to agricultural disease. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-167
414
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Probability of Future Occurrences
While probability of future occurrence is usually calculated based on past experience, different pests have different recidivism rates across the County. Based on past occurrences, pests and invasive species will continue to present a constant threat to the County and its jurisdictions.
Climate Change Considerations
California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment (2018) notes that "climate change impacts terrestrial ecosystems and wildlife in multiple ways, including invasion by exotic species, prevalence of wildlife disease, and loss of native habitats." Changing climate conditions can impact viable living areas of species and cause migration; shift the spread of pests and disease northward by changing habitat temperatures and making previously undesirable habitats welcoming for new species and lengthen habitable seasons (CNRA 2018a). Longer growing seasons may also allow agricultural pests to persist longer, which can increase the severity of infestations on agricultural operations. Further, weather events have become more numerous and more severe. Changes in weather patterns can also have dramatic impacts on the ecosystem, including agriculture systems, and more severe impacts can be expected into the future.
Vulnerability Assessment
General Property
Agricultural losses occur on an annual basis and are usually associated with severe weather events, including heavy rains, floods, hail, freeze, and drought. The State of California Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan attributes most of the agricultural disasters statewide to drought, freeze, and insect infestations.
Other agricultural hazards include fires, crop and livestock disease, noxious weeds, and contamination of animal food and water supplies.
Infestation of agriculture pests could impact crop yields, potential destroying whole fields. Between 2015 and 2018, the RMA paid no indemnities due to damage from insects but paid $22,900 in indemnities due to damage from crop disease.
People
A widespread infestation of livestock and crops could severely impact the economic base of the County and its communities employed by the agriculture industry. According to the USDA 2017 Census of Agriculture, Merced County has 2,337 farms, which is a -6% change from the previous census in 2012.
While agricultural production in the County can enhance the economy and improve human health and ensure stable food prices in California and the U.S., certain habitats established for irrigation and agricultural output can also threaten human health by increasing the risk of vector-borne diseases (e.g. mosquitos, etc.). Rural communities, residing closest to these agricultural operations may also be most vulnerable to these diseases, as livestock pathogens are capable of infecting host species, which may include wildlife and human.
Jobs could be negatively impacted during an agriculture emergency; jobs tangentially tied to the agriculture industry could also be affected. According to "The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment", rising temperatures and drought conditions due to climate change could also lead to increases in the occurrence and transport of pathogens in agricultural environments, which will increase the risk of food contamination and direct human exposure to pathogens and toxins (SGCRP 2016). In turn, this will increase health risks and require greater vigilance in food safety practices and regulation.
Disease can also exacerbate the impacts from other natural hazards. An example of this is adverse weather. Dead branches can be broken by high winds, and there are reports of these branches falling and causing harm to people.
2021-2026 Update Page 4-168
415
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Social Vulnerability
Based on the SoVI data presented and discussed in subsection 4.2.1, the areas with the highest level of social vulnerability in the County are in the western and southeastern portion of the County, as well as some of the incorporated jurisdictions including Merced and Los Banos. These communities as well as those working in the agricultural sector would likely be impacted by the effects of agricultural hazards.
Critical Facilities
Critical facilities assessed in this plan would not be directly impacted by agricultural pests or diseases; however, the food and agriculture industry is considered critical infrastructure in Merced County and California. Impacts to this infrastructure, such as farms, diary operations, and processing facilities would have debilitating effects of food security, the economy, and public health and safety. Merced County farms and ranches, and the associated food processing facilities would be directly impacted economically by long-term disruptions in the food supply associated with crop losses due to agricultural pests and disease.
Economy
According to the University of California's Center for Invasive Species Research, it has been estimated in California alone that invasive pests cost the state at least $3 billion per year. Nationally, it is estimated that invasive species cost the U.S. $138 billion per year. Economic impacts include both prevention, response and recovery costs. Given the contribution of agriculture to the local economy pest impacts could be significant. The value of agricultural commodities noted at the beginning of this hazard profile is $2,890,875,000. Based on that a hypothetical loss of 5% to due to agricultural pest or disease would equate to approximately $144M.
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
Invasive species typically harm native species through predation, habitat degradation and competition for shared resources; they can outcompete native species out of natural habitats and are a leading cause of population decline and extinction in animals.
Tree mortality raises the wildfire threat in healthy forests, increasing the vulnerability, strength, speed and destruction of fires in the area.
Future Development
Most likely, good development practices in the future would not have an impact on Merced County's vulnerability to agricultural pests, plant diseases, marine invasive species or tree mortality.
Risk Summary
• Merced County's farming and agricultural industry is ranked as the top agriculture-producing county in California and the country.
• Agriculture is the dominant land use in Merced County, accounting for more than 90% of all land, or almost 1 million acres.
• Invasive plants cost California $82 million every year in control, monitoring and outreach. • Based on USDA disaster declarations since 1950, none were related to agricultural pests or disease. • Changes in weather patterns can have dramatic impacts on the ecosystem, including agriculture systems, and more severe impacts associated with agricultural pests and disease can be expected into the future.
• Changing climate conditions can shift the spread of pests and disease northward by changing habitat temperatures and making previously undesirable habitats welcoming for new species through longer growing seasons. This may increase the severity of pest infestations on agricultural operations. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-169
416
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• Related hazards: Drought
Table 4-80 Risk Summary - Agricultural Pests, and Disease Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Severity Significance Occurrence
Merced County Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Atwater Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Dos Palos Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Gustine Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Livingston Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Los Banos Extensive Likely Critical Medium
City of Merced Extensive Likely Critical Medium
2021 -202.6 Update Page 4-170
417
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
4.2.16Pandemics/Epidemics
Hazard/Problem Description
Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
A pandemic can be defined as a disease that attacks a large population across great geographic distances.
Pandemics are larger than epidemics in terms of geographic area and number of people affected.
Epidetnics tend to occur seasonally and affect much smaller areas. Pandemics, on the other hand, are most often caused by new subtypes of viruses or bacteria for which humans have little or no natural resistance. Consequently, pandemics typically result in more deaths, social disruption, and economic loss than epidemics.
There are three conditions that trigger a pandemic declaration:
1. A new virus subtype must emerge that has not previously circulated in humans (and therefore there is no pre-existing immunity),
2. This new subtype must be able to cause disease in humans, and
3. The virus must be easily transmissible from human-to-human.
Since March 2020, Merced County, the nation, and the world are dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic (caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus), confirming that pandemic is a key public health hazard in the planning area. This hazard risk assessment includes an analysis of pandemic risk across Merced County and an analysis of the impacts of the hazards profiled in this plan on public health.
Unlike seasonal flu, a pandemic has much greater potential for loss of life and significant social disruption due to higher rates of transmission and more severe health impacts. The SARS-CoV-2 virus has a much higher rate of transmission than the seasonal flu, primarily by airborne transmission of droplets/bodily fluid. Common symptoms include fever, cough, fatigue, shortness of breath or breathing difficulties, and loss of smell and taste. While most people have mild symptoms, some people develop acute respiratory distress syndrome with roughly one in five requiring hospitalization in the United States and a fatality rate between 1 to 2 percent. Because the virus can be transmitted by people who are asymptomatic, and due to the presence of several variants of SARS-CoV-2, containing the spread has been a significant challenge across the globe.
Geographic Area
Pandemics occur not only on a county or state level, but on a national and global scale. It is likely that most communities in Merced County would be affected, either directly or by secondary impacts. Some indirect consequences may be the diversion of resources that may be otherwise available.
Merced County has reported 31,009 cases and 448 deaths from COVID-19 as of April 11, 2021. According to the Merced County Public Health COVID-19 dashboard, the City of Merced has the highest number of cases (approximately 11,100 as of April 12, 2021, and the City of LeGrand Planada and City of Hi I mar have the lowest number of cases in the 700-800 range) as of April 9, 2021. This is likely because cities like Merced have higher populations and municipal areas relative to other cities within the county, and COVID-19 is transmitted primarily from human-to-human contact.
Another example of a human health hazard that is endemic to Merced County is Valley Fever, or "cocci" which is a known, but poorly understood secondary effect of drought conditions, and possibly a combination of wind and drought events followed by a rainy season. Valley Fever is an infection caused by a fungus (Coccidioides immitis) that lives in soil and dirt and in areas with low rainfall, high summer temperatures, and moderate winter temperatures. Valley Fever is primarily a disease of the lungs that is common in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. Valley Fever derives its name from 2021-2026 Update Page 4-171
418
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
its discovery in the San Joaquin Valley of California. While the extent of Valley Fever varies from southwestern United States, northern Mexico, and some parts of Central and South America, the known endemic area in California include portions of the Sacramento Valley, all of the San Joaquin Valley, and desert regions and southern portions of California. Individuals are likely to be affected by Valley Fever if they live in an area where the cocci fungus is prevalent.
Extent (Magnitude/Severity)
The magnitude of a public health emergency will range significantly depending on the transmissivity and mortality rate of the virus. For example, pandemic influenza is easily transmitted from person-to-person, however advances in medical technologies have greatly reduced the number of deaths caused by influenza over time.
Today, a much larger percentage of the world's population is clustered in cities, making them ideal breeding grounds for epidemics. Additionally, the explosive growth in air travel means the virus could spread around the globe within hours. Under such conditions, there may be very warning little time for counties, states, and countries to prepare. Most experts believe we will have just one to six months between the time that a dangerous new influenza strain is identified and the time that outbreaks begin to occur in the United States. Outbreaks are expected to occur simultaneously throughout much of the nation, preventing shifts in human and material resources that normally occur with other natural disasters.
These and many other aspects make pandemics unlike any other public health emergency or community disaster. Pandemics typically last for several months to 1-2 years and have even longer lasting effects on the economy and communities.
As described by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Pandemic Intervals Framework is a six-phased approach to defining the progression of a pandemic. This framework is used to guide pandemic planning and provides recommendations for risk assessment, decision making, and action. These intervals provide a common method to describe pandemic activity which can inform public health actions. The duration of each pandemic interval might vary depending on the characteristics of the virus and the public health response.
The six-phase approach was designed for the easy incorporation of recommendations into existing national and local preparedness and response plans. Phases 1 through 3 correlate with preparedness in the pre-pandemic interval, including capacity development and response planning activities, while Phases 4 through 6 signal the need for response and mitigation efforts during the pandemic interval. Phase 6 was reached in the County during the 2020 COVID outbreak.
Pre-Pandemic Interval
Phase 1 is the natural state in which influenza viruses circulate continuously among animals but do not affect humans.
Phase 2 involves cases of animal influenza that have circulated among domesticated or wild animals and have caused specific cases of infection among humans.
Phase 3 represents the mutation of the animal influenza virus in humans so that it can be transmitted to other humans under certain circumstances (usually very close contact between individuals). At this point, small clusters of infection have occurred.
Pandemic Interval
Phase 4 involves community-wide outbreaks as the virus continues to mutate and become more easily transmitted between people (for example, transmission through the air).
Phase 5 represents human-to-human transmission of the virus in at least two countries. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-172
419
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
Phase 6 is the pandemic phase, characterized by community-level influenza outbreaks.
Past Occurrences
• Since the early 1900s, five lethal pandemics have swept the globe:
• 1918-1919 Spanish Flu: The Spanish Flu was the most severe pandemic in recent history. The number of deaths was estimated to be 50-100 million worldwide and 675,000 in the United States. Its primary victims were mostly young, healthy adults. At one point, more than 10 percent of the American workforce was bedridden.
• 1957-1958 Asian Flu: The 1957 Asian Flu pandemic killed 1 to 2 million people worldwide, including about 70,000 people in the United States, mostly the elderly and chronically ill. Fortunately, the virus was quickly identified, and vaccine production began in May 1957. • 1968-1969 H3N2 Hong Kong Flu: The 1968 Hong Kong Flu pandemic killed 34,000 Americans.
Again, the elderly were more severely affected. This pandemic peaked during school holidays in December, limiting student-related infections, which may have kept the number of infections down.
Also, people infected by the Asian Flu ten years earlier may have gained some resistance to the new virus.
• 2009-2010 H1N1 Swine Flu: This influenza pandemic emerged from Mexico in early 2009 and was declared a public health emergency in the U.S. on April 26. By June, approximately 18,000 cases had been reported in the U.S. and the virus had spread to 74 countries. Most cases were fairly mild, with symptoms similar to the seasonal flu, but there were cases of severe disease requiring hospitalization and a number of deaths. The CDC estimates that 43-89 million people were infected worldwide, with an estimated 8,870 to 18,300 H1N1 related deaths, including 12,469 deaths in the United States. • 2020-Ongoing COVID-19: The COVID-19 or novel coronavirus outbreak began in December 2019 and was declared a pandemic in March of 2020. As of April 11, 2021, over 136 million cases and approximately 2.9 million deaths have been reported globally, according to the WHO. Within the U.S. as of April 11, 2021, over 30 million cases and over 555,000 deaths have been reported. Merced County has reported 31,009 cases so far resulting in 448 deaths. COVID-19 vaccines are currently being administered and thus far almost 15% of Merced County adults (18 years or older) have been fully vaccinated. It will take several months for the entire population to receive a vaccine and achieve herd immunity; additionally, due to the uncertainty in the transmission of several variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the pandemic is expected to continue through 2021.
Probability of Future Occurrences
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic began, most public health experts considered another major pandemic to be inevitable. However, there is no definite way to predict when the next pandemic might occur. Some indicators will be present, but not every new virus turns into a pandemic. Based on the five pandemics that have affected the United States in roughly the last 100 years, a pandemic occurs on average roughly every 20 years.
Climate Change Considerations
Additional research is needed to determine the effects of climate change on the frequency and duration of epidemics and pandemics. Climate change may influence vector-borne disease transmission, although the direction of the effects (increased or decreased incidence) will be location- and disease-specific. The intensity and extent of certain diseases is projected to increase. According to the WHO, there has been research development into the linkages between climate and infectious disease transmission that examine the associations between climate variability and infectious disease occurrence, early indicators of emerging infectious disease impacts of climate change and using predictive models to estimate the future burden of infectious disease under different climate change scenarios (WHO 2003). In summary, future 2021-2026 Update Page 4-173
420
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
risks associated with climate change are difficult to predict, but changes in infectious disease transmission patterns are likely consequences of climate change. Climate change can impact when and where pathogens appear, particularly related to temperature and rainfall patterns.
Ongoing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, building climate resiliency, and creating robust public health campaigns to prevent or prepare for possible increased vector-borne diseases may help to reduce the impacts of climate change on pandemics.
Vulnerability Assessment
Preparing for, responding to, and recovering from a pandemic requires a strategy that includes a holistic suite of public health activities designed to lessen the impact on morbidity and mortality. These activities include education, vaccination, prophylaxis, isolation/quarantine, a robust contact tracing program, and the closure of public facilities. In addition, clear, concise communication with the public and with other agencies remains a critical component, as does the ability of the involved agencies to achieve collaboration and coordination. By their very nature, most pandemics, once started, will not be stopped until they have run their course. This course can be shortened and weakened by a number of factors, with vaccination being the most effective method for protecting the population. Pandemic plans describe strategies of preparedness, response, and recovery to attempt to decrease illnesses and deaths during the pandemic period to manageable levels (i.e., that do not overwhelm the critical infrastructures of the State), and to promote community resiliency and rapid recovery.
General Property
For the most part, property itself is not generally impacted by a human disease epidemic or pandemic.
However, as concerns about contamination increase, property may be quarantined or destroyed as a precaution against spreading illness. Additionally, traditional sheltering facilities including homeless shelters or temporary facilities set up to support displaced persons due to an evacuation or other reason due to a simultaneous disaster occurring cannot be done in a congregate setting. This requires additional planning considerations or use of facilities that allow for non-congregate shelter settings, which may require an approval of a request to FEMA for non-congregate sheltering, and may have an increased cost (such as the use of individual hotel rooms) as opposed to traditional congregate sheltering facilities.
People
Pandemics have the ability to affect large segments of the population for long periods of time. The number of hospitalizations and deaths will depend on the virulence of the virus. Risk groups cannot be predicted with certainty; the elderly, people with underlying medical conditions, and young children are usually at higher risk due to their higher exposure rates from schools, but as discussed above this is not always true for all infectious agents. People without health coverage or access to good medical care are also likely to be more adversely affected. Mental health of the public could also be impacted depending on the length of the event and public health guidance on prevention.
As previously described in the Past Events section above, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 555,000 deaths in the U.S. alone (448 in Merced County). In addition to the direct impacts, the pandemic has completely disrupted life for many people. Most large gatherings have had to be cancelled, and many schools have closed. Sheltering in place and social distancing have been highly encouraged and, in some places, mandated, leaving some individuals isolated for months.
Social Vulnerability
Preparing for, responding to, and recovering from a pandemic requires a strategy that includes a holistic suite of public health activities designed to lessen the impact on morbidity and mortality. These activities include education, vaccination, prophylaxis, isolation/quarantine, a robust contact tracing program, and 2021-2026 Update Page 4-174
421
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
the closure of public facilities. In addition, clear, concise communication with the public and with other agencies remains a critical component, as does the ability of the involved agencies to achieve collaboration and coordination. By their very nature, most pandemics, once started, will not be stopped until they have run their course. This course can be shortened and weakened by a number of factors, with vaccination being the most effective method for protecting the population. Pandemic plans describe strategies of preparedness, response, and recovery to attempt to decrease illnesses and deaths during the pandemic period to manageable levels (i.e., that do not overwhelm the critical infrastructures of the State), and to promote community resiliency and rapid recovery.
Critical Facilities
In the event of a pandemic, especially one with high transmission rates and mortality rates such as COVID19, community lifelines, such as healthcare facilities, like hospitals will be heavily affected and may be overwhelmed due to limited number of beds, doctor and medical staff, laboratory testing capacity, and possible personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages. Indirect impacts can also result in these facilities being temporarily offline due to testing or other precautionary monitoring and downed systems. Further, outbreaks in small cities and counties may cause medical facilities to reach capacity very quickly. Other critical facilities and infrastructure are not directly affected by a pandemic but may have difficulty maintaining operations and maintenance activities due to a significantly decreased workforce. Schools may also be forced to close.
Economy
Pandemics can have extensive economic impacts, as evidenced by the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions on social gatherings. Social distancing requirements have affected nearly every segment of the local and national economy, most notably the restaurant and hospitality industries.
Additionally, tourism may be impacted in affected areas. As a result, the unemployment rate can increase, which also occurred in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Other economic impacts including varying disruptions in the food supply chains and other essential medical services.
Historic, Cultural and Natural Resources
Impacts to these resources are typically minimal. However, reduced tourism during outbreaks could lead to additional economic impacts.
Future Development
Population growth and development contribute to pandemic exposure. Future development in and around Merced County has the potential to change how infectious diseases spread through the community and impact human health in both the short and long-term. New development may increase the number of people and facilities exposed to public health hazards and greater population concentrations (often found in special needs facilities, businesses, and school campuses) put more people at risk. During a disease outbreak those in the immediate isolation area would have little to no warning, whereas, the population further away in the dispersion path may have some time to prepare and mitigate against disease depending on the hazard, its transmission, and public notification.
Risk Summary
• Pandemics affecting the U.S. occur roughly once every 20 years but cannot be reliably predicted. • Effects on people will vary, but a significant portion of the population could become ill, and may need to be hospitalized
• Effects on property are typically minimal, although quarantines could result in short-term closures. 2021-2026 Update Page 4-175
422
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment
• Community lifelines, such as healthcare facilities, like hospitals will be impacted and may be overwhelmed and have difficulty maintaining operations due to bed availability, medical staffing shortages, and lack of PPE and other supplies.
• Lost productivity due to illness and potential business closures could potentially have severe economic impacts, such as increased unemployment rates in the County. Social distancing requirements and fear of public gatherings could also significantly reduce in person commerce. • The hazard is considered high significance across all participating jurisdictions. • Ongoing mitigation activities should focus on disease prevention, especially during flu season. This includes, but is not limited to, pre-season community outreach campaigns to educate the public about risks and available support; establishing convenient vaccination centers; reaching out to vulnerable populations and care givers; and issuing advisories and warnings.
Table 4-81 Hazard Risk Summary - Pandemics/Epidemics
Probability of
Magnitude/ Overall
Jurisdiction Geographic Area Future
Occurrence Severity Significance
Merced County Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High
City of Atwater Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High
City of Dos Palos Extensive Occasional Critical Medium
City of Gustine Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High
City of Livingston Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High City of Los Banos Extensive Occasional Catastrophic High City of Merced Extensive Occasional Critical Medium
2021-2026 Update Page 4-176
423
I
MEB..CED~ --------------M_e_rc_ed_ Co_u_n~ty_M_u_lt_i-_Ju_ri_sd_ic_ti_on_a_l_H_az_a_rd_M_i_tig~a_ti_on_ Pl_an - Mitigation Strategy COUNTY
5 MITIGATION STRATEGY
Requirement §201.6(c)(3):
{The plan shall include the following.] A mitigation strategy that provides the jurisdiction's blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment, based on existing authorities, policies, programs, and resources, and its ability to expand on and improve these existing tools.
This section describes the mitigation strategy process and mitigation action plan for the Merced County MJHMP. It describes how the County and participating jurisdictions met the requirements for the following from the 10-step planning process:
• Planning Step 6: Set Goals
• Planning Step 7: Review Possible Activities
• Planning Step 8: Draft an Action Plan
The mitigation strategy reflects the results of the collaborative work of the HMPT. Subsection 5.3 Mitigation Action Plan is based on the updated planning process, risk assessment, capability assessment, goal setting, and the identification of mitigation actions. Taking all of these into consideration, the HMPT developed the following overall mitigation strategy:
• Communicate the hazard information collected and analyzed through this planning process as well as HMPT success stories so that the community better understands what can happen where and what they themselves can do to be better prepared.
• Implement the action plan recommendations of this plan. • Use existing rules, regulations, policies, and procedures already in existence. Given the flood hazard in the planning area, an emphasis should be placed on continued compliance with the NFIP. • Monitor multi-objective management opportunities so that funding opportunities may be shared and packaged, and broader constituent support may be garnered.
5.1 Mitigation Goals and Objectives
§201.6(c)(3)(i)
{The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a] description of mitigation goals to reduce or avoid longterm vulnerabilities to the identified hazards.
Up to this point in the planning process, the HMPT has organized resources, assessed hazards and risks, and documented mitigation capabilities. The resulting goals, objectives, and mitigation actions were developed based on these tasks. The HMPT held a series of meetings and exercises designed to achieve a collaborative, updated mitigation strategy as described further throughout this section.
Over a series of meetings during the 2021 update process the HMPT reviewed the results of the hazard identification, vulnerability assessment, and capability assessment update. This analysis of the risk assessment identified areas where improvements could be made and provided the framework for the HMPT to update planning goals and objectives and the ultimate mitigation strategy for the Merced County planning area.
Goals were defined for the purpose of this mitigation plan as broad-based public policy statements that:
• Represent basic desires of the community;
2021-2026 Update Page 5-1
424
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
• Encompass all aspects of community, public and private; • Are nonspecific, in that they refer to the quality (not the quantity) of the outcome; • Are future-oriented, in that they are achievable in the future; and • Are time-independent, in that they are not scheduled events.
Goals are stated without regard to implementation. Implementation cost, schedule, and means are not considered. Goals are defined before considering how to accomplish them so that they are not dependent on the means of achievement. Goal statements form the basis for objectives and actions that will be used as means to achieve the goals. Objectives define strategies to attain the goals and are more specific and measurable.
During the 2021 plan update process, HMPT members review the existing goals and objectives as well the goals and objectives from 2018 State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan and from the 2014 City of Merced LHMP. Through a brainstorming process at their third meeting, the HMPT identified a variety of possible goals and then came to a consensus on seven main sets of goals and objectives. Goals 4, 5 and 6 are new to 2021 plan update; other revisions included removing the word "natural" from the goals to be more inclusive to all hazards. Following the development of goals, the HMPT also identified specific objectives to achieve each goal. Goals and objectives are listed below, but are not prioritized:
• Goal 1: Reduce the potential for loss of life and injury from hazards Assist vulnerable populations from the impacts of severe weather by organizing a mechanism for outreach.
Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks Identify opportunities to reduce losses associated with High Hazard potential dams • Goal 2: Minimize or reduce damage to property.
Minimize growth and development in hazard areas
Adopt and enforce building codes
Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks Identify opportunities to reduce losses associated with High Hazard potential dams • Goal 3: Build resiliency and redundancy to maintain essential services, lifelines, facilities, and infrastructure.
Ensure protection and enhancement of key emergency access routes Protect critical facilities and infrastructure to minimize loss of critical services Seek funding sources and partners for future mitigation activities Improve organizational capabilities to address health and safety issues in mitigation and response
• Goal 4: Minimize impacts of hazards to agriculture and the economies of communities.
Encourage water conservation measures among urban, rural, and agricultural users Increase water storage to mitigate flooding and drought Strengthen disaster resistance and resiliency of major employers Develop plans for post-disaster recovery
• Goal 5: Protect and leverage natural and beneficial mitigation functions of the environment.
Encourage the use of drought tolerant or xeriscaping practices into landscape ordinances Incorporate defensible space in landscaping of new and existing development • Goal 6: Promote hazard mitigation as an integrated policy. 2021-2026 Update Page 5-2
425
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
Promote hazard mitigation as integrated policy among communities in the county and with the region and state
Incorporate flood mitigation into local planning by adoption of post-disaster recovery ordinance based on a plan to regulate repair activity
Continue to improve enforcement of existing standards and regulations • Goal 7: Increase public awareness of hazards.
Promote education and awareness about natural hazards risk, mitigation, and preparedness to citizens, public agencies, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, and businesses Develop water saving education program
Increase communication regarding hazard mitigation among communities in the county
5.1.1 Continued Compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) The NFIP makes federally backed flood insurance available to homeowners, renters, and business owners in participating communities. For most participating communities, FEMA has prepared a detailed Flood Insurance Study. The study presents water surface elevations for floods of various magnitudes, including the 1% annual chance flood (or 100-year flood) and the 0.2% annual chance flood (or 500-year flood).
Base flood elevations and the boundaries of the 100- and 500-year floodplains are shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which are the principal tools for identifying the extent and location of the riverine flood hazard. FIRMs are the most detailed and consistent data source available, and for many communities they represent the minimum area of oversight under their floodplain management program.
Participants in the NFIP must, at a minimum, regulate development in floodplain areas in accordance with NFIP criteria. Before issuing a permit to build in a floodplain, participating jurisdictions must ensure that three criteria are met:
• New buildings and those undergoing substantial improvements must, at a minimum, be elevated to protect against damage by the 100-year flood.
• New floodplain development must not aggravate existing flood problems or increase damage to other properties.
• New floodplain development must exercise a reasonable and prudent effort to reduce its adverse impacts on threatened salmonid species.
Merced County, Atwater, Dos Palos, Livingston, Los Banos and Merced participate in the NFIP. Structures permitted or built in the county before 1979 when the County, Atwater and Merced joined the NFIP (1978 for Dos Palos and Livingston and 1998 for Los Banos) are called "pre-FIRM" structures, and structures built afterwards are called "post-FIRM." Post-FIRM structures built in compliance with the floodplain regulations are mitigated to withstand floods up through the 100-year event. The insurance rate is different for the two types of structures, as pre-FIRM structures are at higher risk of flooding. The effective date for the current countywide FIRM is December 2, 2008. The County and participating jurisdictions are currently in good standing with the provisions of the NFIP. Compliance is monitored by FEMA regional staff. Maintaining compliance with the NFIP is an important component of flood mitigation and risk reduction.
The City of Gustine is not a participant in the NFIP and has been sanctioned since December 2, 2009. This means that residents are not able to obtain flood insurance from the NFIP. The City has minimal flood risk and the effective FEMA flood hazard mapping does not show any Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) or 1 % annual chance flooding within city limits. This has been the reason for not joining the NFIP, but as part of this plan update the City will revisit the cost and benefit of joining, including working with CA DWR and FEMA to understand the implications of the sanction designation. Refer to the mitigation strategy in 2021 -2026 Update Page 5-3
426
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
Section 5 for more information on specific mitigation actions related to addressing the sanction designation.
Given the flood hazard and risk in the planning area and recognizing the importance of the NFIP in mitigating flood losses, an emphasis is placed on continued compliance with the NFIP by Merced County and all NFIP participating jurisdictions including Atwater, Dos Palos, Livingston, Los Banos and Merced. As NFIP participants, these communities have and will continue to make every effort to remain in good standing with NFIP. This includes continuing to comply with the NFIP's requirements for adopting official FEMA floodplain maps and maintaining, enforcing, and updating local floodplain regulations.
5.2 Identification and Analysis of Mitigation Actions
§201.6(c)(3)(ii):
[The hazard mitigation strategy shall include a] section that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive range of specific mitigation actions and projects being considered to reduce the effects of each hazard, with particular emphasis on new and existing buildings and infrastructure. All plans approved by FEMA after October 1, 2008, must also address the jurisdiction's participation in the NF/P, and continued compliance with NFIP requirements, as appropriate.
In order to identify and select mitigation measures to support the mitigation goals, each hazard identified in Section 4: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment was evaluated. The HMPT analyzed a comprehensive set of viable mitigation alternatives for both new and existing buildings and infrastructure that would support identified goals and objectives. Each HMPT member was provided with the following list of categories of mitigation measures, which originate from the NFIP CRS:
• Prevention: Administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built.
• Property protection: Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or remove them from the hazard area. • Structural: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. • Natural resource protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems.
• Emergency services: Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after a disaster or hazard event.
• Public information/education and awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about the hazards and potential ways to mitigate them.
At the mitigation strategy meeting the HMPT was also provided with a matrix showing examples of potential mitigation action alternatives for each of the above categories, for each of the identified hazards.
The HMPT was also provided a handout that explains the categories and provided further examples.
Another reference document titled "Mitigation Ideas" developed by FEMA in 2013 and FEMA's 2020 "Mitigation Action Portfolio" were distributed to the HMPT via an on line link. These document lists the common alternatives for mitigation by hazard and actions funded by FEMA. The HMPT was also instructed to consider both future and existing buildings in considering possible mitigation actions. This reference provides four categories of mitigation actions that were discussed at the HMPT meeting in addition to the NFIP/CRS categories. These include:
• Plans and Regulations
• Structure and Infrastructure Projects
• Education and Awareness
2021-2026 Update Page 5-4
427
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan • Natural systems protection
Other alternatives discussed in the webinar include the four 'A's' of mitigation:
• Alter the physical nature of the hazard
Such as wildfire defensible space and fuels treatments, snow fences etc. • Avert the hazard away from people, buildings, and infrastructure Mitigation Strategy
Can include engineered solutions, drainage, and channel improvements, floodproofing, fuel breaks
• Adapt to the hazard
- Through land use planning, building codes and design standards, warning systems etc. • Avoid the hazard
Natural systems protection, open space, acquisition, or relocation of properties out of hazardous areas
As part of the review of mitigation options long-term climate change adaptation strategies were also discussed. HMPT members were encouraged to incorporate climate change adaptation measures into the mitigation strategy of their respective jurisdictions utilizing resources and guidance available on the CalAdapt website.
To facilitate the brainstorming process, the HMPT referred to a matrix of typical mitigation alternatives organized by CRS category for the hazards identified in the plan, in addition to a handout that explains the categories and provided examples. These materials are included in Appendix B. HMPT members were encouraged to develop mitigation alternatives that would protect future, as well as existing, development from hazards per the DMA 2000 regulations. A facilitated discussion then took place to examine the existing actions in the 2014 plan and analyze the other possible mitigation alternatives. With an understanding of the alternatives, a brainstorming session was conducted to generate a list of preferred mitigation actions. The result was new and updated project ideas with the intent of meeting the identified goals and mitigating identified hazards.
These new and updated project actions were expanded on during a fourth HMPT meeting scheduled to focus on the refinement and prioritization of new mitigation activities. During the fourth HMPT meeting, Wood facilitated a discussion on the draft MJHMP and any remaining information or mitigation gaps that needed to be addressed. During the fourth HMPT meeting the group also discussed opportunities for plan integration and reviewed the plan implementation and maintenance procedures.
5.2.1 Prioritization Process
Once the mitigation actions were identified, the HMPT was provided with several decision making tools, including FEMA's recommended prioritization criteria, STAPLEE, to assist in deciding why one recommended action might be more important, more effective, or more likely to be implemented than another. STAPLEE stands for the following:
• Social: Does the measure treat people fairly? (e.g., different groups, different generations) Does it consider social equity, disadvantaged communities, or vulnerable populations? • Technical: Will it work? (Is the action technically feasible? Does it solve the problem?) • Administrative: Is there capacity to implement and manage the project? (adequate staffing, funding, and other capabilities to implement the project?)
• Political: Who are the stakeholders? Did they get to participate? Will there be adequate political and public support for the project?
• Legal: Does the jurisdiction have the legal authority to implement the action? Is it legal? Are there liability implications?
2021 2026 Update Page 5-5
428
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
• Economic: Is the action cost-beneficial? Is there funding available? Will the action contribute to the local economy?
• Environmental: Does the action comply with environmental regulations? Will there be negative environmental consequences from the action?
In accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act requirements, an emphasis was placed on the importance of a benefit-cost analysis in determining action priority. Other criteria used to assist in evaluating the benefit-cost of a mitigation action included:
• Does the action address hazards or areas with the highest risk? • Does the action protect lives?
• Does the action protect infrastructure, community assets or critical facilities? • Does the action meet multiple objectives (Multiple Objective Management)? • What will the action cost?
• What is the timing of available funding?
The mitigation categories, multi-hazard actions, and criteria are included in Appendix D: Mitigation Categories and Alternatives.
At the mitigation strategy webinar, the HMPT reviewed and discussed the STAPLEE considerations to determine which of the identified actions were most likely to be implemented and effective. Prioritization of previous mitigation actions identified in the 2014 HMP that were carried forward in the updated plan were revisited during the fourth HMPT meeting. New actions identified in 2021 also were prioritized based on the group discussion. With the STAPLEE criteria in mind, HMPT participants were given a set of three green sticky dot stickers. The team was asked to use the dots to prioritize projects with the above criteria in mind, essentially voting on the projects. The projects with the most dots became the higher priority projects. This process provided both consensus and priority for the recommendations.
The process of identification and analysis of mitigation alternatives allowed the HMPT to come to consensus and to collectively prioritize recommended mitigation actions. During the voting process, emphasis was placed on the importance of a benefit-cost review in determining project priority; however, this was not a quantitative analysis. Benefit-cost was considered in greater detail in the development of the Mitigation Action Plan. For example, parameters were established for assigning subjective ratings (high, medium, low) to the benefits and costs of each mitigation action. Specifically, each action developed for this plan contains a description of the problem and proposed project, the entity with primary responsibility for implementation, any other alternatives considered, a cost estimate, expected project benefits, potential funding sources, and a schedule for implementation. Development of these project details for each action led to the determination of an overall high, medium, or low priority for each action.
Recognizing the limitations in prioritizing actions from multiple departments and the regulatory requirement to prioritize by benefit-cost to ensure cost-effectiveness, the HMPT decided to pursue mitigation action strategy development and implementation according to the nature and extent of damages, the level of protection and benefits each action provides, political support, project cost, available funding, and jurisdiction and department priority. This process guided the development of a prioritized action plan for Merced County and the participating jurisdictions.
Cost-effectiveness will be considered in greater detail through a formal benefit-cost analysis when seeking FEMA mitigation grant eligibility and funding (e.g. HMGP, PDM grant programs) for eligible actions associated with this plan.
2021-2026 Update Page 5-6
429
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
5.3 Mitigation Strategy Action Plan
§201.6(c)(3)(iii)
[The hazard mitigation strategy shall include an] action plan, describing how the action identified in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section will be prioritized, implemented, and administered by the local jurisdiction. Prioritization shall include a special emphasis on the extent to which benefits are maximized according to a cost benefit review of the proposed projects and their associated costs. §201.6(c)(3)(iv)
For multi-jurisdictional plans, there must be identifiable action items specific to the jurisdiction requesting FEMA approval or credit of the plan.
This action plan was developed to present the recommendations developed by the HMPT for how the Merced County planning area can reduce the vulnerability of people, property, infrastructure, and natural and cultural resources to future disaster losses. Over time the implementation of these projects will be tracked as a measure of demonstrated progress on meeting the plan's goals.
5.3.1 Progress on Previous Mitigation Actions
A review of 2014 mitigation actions progress reports indicates that Merced County and the participating jurisdictions have been successful in implementing actions identified in the 2014 LHMP Mitigation Strategy, thus, working diligently towards meeting the 2014 plan goals. The 2014 mitigation strategy contained 36 separate mitigation actions. As of September 2021, two of these actions have been completed, three deleted and 39 actions are continuing. The table below summarizes progress implementing mitigation actions by jurisdiction. The total continuing actions column summarizes the actions from 2014 that are either still in progress, have annual implementation, or are continuing but not completed. The new actions in 2021 summarizes the number of actions that were identified during the 2021 plan update process.
T bl 5 1 M"f . f At· P • s b J . d" f
Continue Continue Total New Grand
Jurisdiction Completed Deleted In Progress Not Continuing Actions Total Started Actions in 2021 Actions
Atwater 0 2 2 4 6 4 10
Dos Palos NA NA NA NA NA 2 2
Gustine NA NA NA NA NA 4 4
Livingston 0 0 2 6 8 1 9
Los Banos 0 1 7 0 7 8 15
Merced 0 0 2 8 10 1 11
Unincorporated 2 0 7 1 8 12 20
Grand Total 2 3 20 19 39 31 70
2021-2026 Update Page 5-7
430
ID
10 11
7 9
7 Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
Table 5-2 indicates the details for each of the 2014 mitigation action items that have been completed or deleted.
Table 5-2 Completed and Deleted Mitigation Actions
Corresponding Lead
Mitigation Action Goals Priority Action Status Notes Hazard(s) Agency Merced County
Completed. This
program is in place and
Drought
Promote Water Conservation OES / CEO's 1,2,3 High implemented regularly Program Office due to continuing
challenges with
drought.
Wildfire Implement and Monitor Weed County Fire 1,2,3 High Completed. Abatement Program Citv of Atwater
Flood Insurance Promotion, CRS Deleted. The City does
Flood Program Planning 1,2,3 High not have enough flood Implementation/Participation Department insurance policies to justify joininq CRS.
Deleted. This program is
in place and
Drought Promote Water Conservation Public 1,2,3 High implemented regularly Program Works due to continuing
challenges with
drought.
City of Los Banos
Flood Insurance Promotion, CRS Deleted. The City does
Flooding Program Implementation/ Planning 1,2,3 High not have enough flood Participation. Department insurance policies to
iustifv ioininq CRS.
5.3.2 Updated Action Plan
The results of the project identification and prioritization exercise from meetings 3 and 4 is summarized in Table 5-3. These projects detail specific actions for reducing future hazard-related losses within Merced County. The projects are organized by jurisdictions and include notes about the department and partners necessary to implement the project. Table 5-3 provides more details on the mitigation actions, including the mitigation action description estimated cost, potential funding sources, timeline, indication of the goal(s) that the projects primarily align with and are marked with their relative level of priority high, medium, and low. The following table also provides status/implementation notes that describe progress made on the actions so far, using the following categories, and, where applicable, notes if there were changes in the priority level from the previous plan:
• Continue - In Progress: work has begun on the project and is ongoing. • Continue - Not completed: little or no work has been done on the project to date and the HMPT agreed to carry over the action into the updated plan.
• New in 2021: The action is new to this plan update; little to no work has been completed.
Many of these mitigation actions are intended to reduce impacts to existing development. Those that protect future development from hazards, as required per the DMA 2000 regulations, are indicated by an asterisk'*' in the action identification number. These actions include those that promote wise 2021-2026 Update Page 5-8
431
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
development and hazard avoidance, such as building code, mapping, and zoning improvements, and continued enforcement of floodplain development regulations.
Table 5-4 provides a summary of the individual mitigation actions by jurisdiction specific to the municipalities that participated in the 2021 plan update. The timeline for implementation for each hazard mitigation action is organized into the following timeframes: ongoing, annual implementation, 1-2 years (short-term), 2-3 years (medium-term), or 3-5 years (long-term). Together with the County actions the tables provide an overview of all the mitigation actions proposed. More details can be found in the respective jurisdictional annexes.
2021-2026 Update Page 5-9
432
Table 5-3
Goal{s)
ID &
Lifelines
1,7
NA
1,2,4,6 2* I
NA
Merced County Mitigation Actions
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
MultiHazard:
Dam
Incident, I Earthquake
Flooding
Severe
Weather
Wildfire
MultiHazard:
1 Earthquake,
Flooding,
Severe
Weather,
Wildfire
Description/Background/
Benefits
Countywide Public Education
Program - A natural hazards
education and awareness program in
Merced County would be a valuable
tool for sharing information with
residents. Implementation ideas
include sharing information online
and conducting workshops. The
county will partner with special
districts, the cities and other entities
to provide awareness and education
on hazards and steps to mitigate.
Integrate Local Hazard Mitigation
Plan into Safety Element of General
Plan. Recognizing the potential
duplication of effort over evaluation
of the same issues, efforts to update
the Health and Safety Element will be
conducted in coordination with the
multi-hazard mitigation plan and to
also ensure AB 2140 Compliance.
Integration and coordination of both
plans provides General Plan policy
direction for development activity.
Potential loss reductions in the
$1000s as any new development
within the county will be considered
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
OES /CEO's
Office
Community
Developme
nt Agency
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
Continue In Progress. The 2014
$100,000 HMP included four of the six
Federal High Ongoing incorporated cities. The 2021
plan included all 6-cities. This
Grants
program will expand as a joint
effort between all 6-cities.
Next Continue In Progress. The
$S,000 General updated 2021 plan will be
General Medium Plan incorporated by reference into
Fund review the Safety Element as part of
cycle the MJHMP adoption process.
2021-2026 Update Page 5-10
433
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
3 I 1,7
NA
4 I 1,2
NA
1,2,6
5 I Food,
Water,
Shelter
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Description/Background/
Benefits
within the context of the county's
Health and Safety Element.
Non-structural Earthquake Mitigation
Outreach. Existing structures can be
retrofitted to better withstand
damage from seismic events.
Outreach will include educating home
and business owners about structural
and non-structural retrofit techniques
I h k I and how to seismically strengthen
Eart qua e their homes and businesses. Specific
techniques include secure furnishings,
storage cabinets and utilities to
prevent injuries and damages, such as
anchoring, installing lathes, using
flexible connections on gas and water
lines, and bracing propane tanks and
water heaters.
Countywide Inventory of Historic
Unreinforced Masonry Buildings -
Use GIS a to map and track URMs
I Earthquake I Countywide. An accurate inventory of
URM Buildings with appropriate
tracking will lessen time during the
recovery after an EQ.
Periodically review building codes for
Earthquake updates and enhancements and
ensure necessary capabilities for
enforcement.
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
Environmen
tal Health
Building
Department
Building
Department
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
Continue In Progress. An
$100,000 earthquake safety flyer was
Federal Medium Ongoing created and posted on Public
Health social media and the
Grants Division of Environmental
Health's website.
Continue - In Progress. Not
$100,000 Completed. The County
Federal Medium 1-2 years Building Department has not
tracked or kept records of URM
Grants Buildings in the unincorporated
portion of Merced County.
Staff time Annual Continue - Not Started. The
Dept. Medium impleme enforcement of building codes
Budget ntation is standard regulatory practice.
2021-2026 Update Page 5-11
434
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
1,2,4
Safety 6 I and
Security
1,2,7
7 I Safety
and
Security
1,2,3
Safety 8 I and
Security
9 I 1,7
NA I
3 10 I Commun
ications
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Flood
Flood
Flood
Severe
Weather:
Wind,
Extreme
Temps.,
Tornadoes,
Dense Fog
Cyber
Attack
Description/Background/
Benefits
Develop a Hazard Specific Flood
Annex for all jurisdictions with focus
on flood hazard areas as described in
the Risk Assessment. The annex will
address the associated risks of
flooding, current and past mitigation
efforts specific to the streams and
localized flood areas in the county.
Flood Insurance Promotion Program
Implementation/Participation. County
staff will promote benefits of flood
insurance
Identify and evaluate effectiveness of
alternative detention basin flood
control projects that will reduce flood
flows in Black Rascal Creek at the
diversion.
Winter Weather Preparedness
Campaign. This project would add to
and enhance the existing, campaigns
that share information on Severe
Weather Hazards: Fog, Freeze,
Location of Warming Centers, Heat
Related Illness, All Hazards
Preparedness information, etc.; The
county will work with special districts,
the cities and other entities.
Cyber Security. Establish a risk
management program to identify the
risks, understand their likelihood and
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
OES, Public
Works
OES,
Planning
Department
Public
Works
OES/CEO's
Office
OES,
Jurisdiction
s
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
$90,000 Continue In Progress. The
State and County EOP captures the county
Federal High 1-2 years in its entirety. County OES is
Grants working to include all six cities.
Staff Time Annual
Dept. High lmpleme I Continue In Progress.
Budget ntation
$500;000- Continue In Progress. The
4M. County has identified a
State and High 1-2 years preferred alternative as of 2021 Federal but construction has not yet
Grants begun.
$100,000 Annual Continue In Progress. This
Federal High lmpleme program is expanded each year
utilizing various outreach
Grants ntation strategies.
$500,000-
$2,500,000 I Medium I 2-3 years I New in 2021
Grants,
2021-2026 Update Page 5-12
435
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
11 I 4
NA I
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought
Description/Background/
Benefits
impact. Once identified place security I
controls that mitigate the risks to a
level considered acceptable. The risk
management program will also
include ongoing evaluation and
assessment of cyber security risks and
controls throughout the life cycle of
the software. Ideas for
implementation: Define the system.
Identify cyber assets and their
classification. Identify the electronic
security perimeter protecting these
assets. Conduct vulnerability
assessment: Identify threats. Identify
vulnerabilities. Identify security risks
along with their impact and
likelihood. Assess the effectiveness of
existing security controls in mitigating
the risks. Recommend new security
controls or changes to existing
security controls to mitigate the
severity of the risks to a level
acceptable to the organization.
Continuously monitor the
effectiveness of security controls.
Periodically repeat this process to
account for system changes and
changes in the threat landscape.
I Drought Plan. Develop drought plans
that outline proactive strategies that I
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
OES
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
I
General
Fund
I $500.000-
$10,000,00 I High I 3-5 years I New in 2021
2021-2026 Update Page 5-13
436
Goal(s)
ID &
12 Lifelines
4 Food,
Water,
Shelter
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Drought,
Flood
Description/Background/
Benefits
can be implemented before, during,
and after drought to increase societal
and environmental resiliency and
enhance drought response and
recovery capabilities Investigate
drought monitoring, risk, and
management options. Include water
conservation projects that seek to
reduce the nonessential use of water
to conserve county water supplies.
Conservation projects include
establishing mandatory water
restrictions within Merced County to
discourage waste and incorporate
treatment of recycled water for
potable consumption.
Groundwater Recharge and
Stormwater Detention Pilot Project. A
pilot project is being conducted by
Eastside Water District on Merced
County property in 2021 that
included installation of three dry wells
at the Mustang Creek Flood
Detention Basin for groundwater
recharge. This project will also assist
in mitigating flooding from
stormwater scenarios. When dry wells
are installed, they will prevent erosion
and localized flooding while also
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
OES,
County
Water
Resources,
Eastside
Water
District
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
0 Grants,
General
Fund
$500,000-
$3,000,000
Grants,
General
Fund
High 2-3 years I New in 2021
2021-2026 Update Page 5-14
437
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
13 I 1,3,6
NA
14 I NA
1 s I NA
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
MultiHazard:
Dam
Incidents,
1 Earthquake,
HazMat,
Flooding,
Landslide,
Severe
Weather
Wildfire
I Wildfire
Description/Background/
Benefits
allowing collection and control of
stormwater runoff.
Public Safety GIS Management. Build
and enhance GIS work done in 2021
Hazard Mitigation Plan Update to
help make the HMP a living
document and an ongoing resource
for understanding risk in Merced
County.
Encourage and continue to establish
I countywide evacuation zones,
sections and routes.
Conduct an After Action Review for
I Pandemic/ I COVID-19 response to identify
Epidemic lessons learned and ways to mitigate
impacts of future pandemics.
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
County GIS
Division,
Cities, Cal
OES
OES
Public
Health, OES
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
$50,000 -
$75,000
Federal,
state and
local I High I 2-3 years I New in 2021
grants,
FEMA
Grants, Cal
OES Funds
$50,000 -
$75,000
Federal,
state and
local I High I 2-3 years I New in 2021
grants,
FEMA
Grants, Cal
OES Funds
20,000 -
$40,000
Federal, I I 1-2 years state and Medium I New in 2021
local
grants,
FEMA
2021-2026 Update Page 5-15
438
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
16 I NA I
17 I NA I
Food,
18 I Water,
Shelter
19 I HazMat I
20 I NA I
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Description/Background/
Benefits
Develop a plan for a Countywide
Pandemic/ I Medical Reserve Corps to provide
Epidemic surge capacity to mitigate impacts of
pandemic/epidemics
Agricultural
Provide public outreach through a
variety of media for awareness and
Pest &
mitigation of various agricultural Disease
pests and disease.
Enhance the County's capabilities
associated with the Pest Detection
Agricultural Program, Pest Exclusion Program, and
Pest & Pest Eradication Program to mitigate
Disease agricultural pests and disease.
Delimitation plan activated through
AG Commissioner and CDFAjointly.
Identify and increase water
Hazardous I management practices that reduce
Materials pesticide movement offsite to
mitigate hazardous materials impacts
Create a hazardous materials safety
flyer to post on public health social
media and the division of
Hazardous I environmental health's website.
Materials Provide free classes to Merced
County businesses about proper
storage/handling of hazardous
materials and hazardous waste.
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
Public
Health, OES
Agricultural
Commissio
ner, CDFA
Agricultural
Commissio
ner, CDFA
Environmen
tal Health
Environmen
tal Health
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Cost
Estimate
Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
Grants, Cal
OES Funds
Staff Time J . J 2-3 years Dept. Medium I New in 2021
Budget
Staff Time I
Dept. Low I 2-3 years I New in 2021
Budget
Staff Time I
Dept. Low I 2-3 years I New in 2021
Budget
Staff Time I
Dept. Low I 2-3 years I New in 2021
Budget
Staff Time I
Dept. Low I 1-2 years I New in 2021
Budget
2021-2026 Update Page 5-16
439
Goal(s)
ID &
Lifelines
21 HazMat
Hazard(s)
Mitigated
Hazardous
Materials
Description/Background/
Benefits
Develop countywide commodity flow
study to further understand the
quantity and types of hazardous
materials being transported through
the county to provide the basis for
additional mitigation actions.
Lead
Agency
and
Partners
Environmen
tal Health
Cost
Estimate
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
& Priority Timeline Status/Implementation Notes
Potential
Funding
$50,000 -
$175,000
Federal,
state and
local
grants,
FEMA
Grants, Cal
OES Funds
High
2-3 years New in 2021
2021-2026 Update Page 5-1 7
440
Merced Coun ty Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
Table 5-4 Jurisdictional Mitigation Action Summary
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners Citv of Atwater
MultiHazard: Participate in Earthquake Countywide Public 1 Flooding Education OES High Continue Not Started Severe Program. Weather
Wildfire
MultiHazard: Integrate Local
Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Community
2* Flooding Plan into Safety Development Medium Continue In Progress Severe Element of Agency
Weather General Plan.
Wildfire
Non-structural
3 Earthquake Earthquake Public Works Medium Continue Not Started Mitigation Outreach
Participate in
Countywide
4 Earthquake Inventory for Public Works Medium Continue Not Started Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
-
MultiHazard:
Earthquake Periodically review
S* Flooding building codes for Building Medium Continue Not Started Landslide updates and Department Severe enhancements
Weather
Wildfire
Promote Water
6 Drought Conservation Public Works High Continue In Progress Prooram
Earthquake Emergency power
Severe system to protect
Weather: the City of Police 7 General Atwater 911 Department High New in 2021 Communications Dam Center and Police Incidents Department Seismic Upgrade
and Remodel of Police 8 Earthquake the Atwater Police Department High New in 2021 Department
Headquarters
2021 -2026 Update Page 5-18
441
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners
Review hazards
and awareness of
earthquakes in a
9 Earthquake public platform Police High New in 2021
and educate the Department
public on helpful
procedures in the
aftermath
Agricultural Public education Community
10 Pest & of current Development Low New in 2021
Disease seasonal threat Aqency
City of Dos Palos
1 Multi- Radio upgrade for Police
Medium New in 2021
Hazard police department Department
Construction of
new water Dept. of
2 Drought treatment plant High New in 2021
with resiliency Utilities
uoarades
City of Gustine
Develop and
enhance storm
1 Flooding
water drainage Public Works High New in 2021
improvements to
reduce frequent
flooding.
Perform buildingspecific seismic
vulnerability
2 Earthquake
assessment of Public Works Medium New in 2021
City-owned
critical facilities
constructed prior
to 1980
3 Drought Develop drought Public Works High New in 2021 plan Explore Public Works,
4* Flooding cost/benefit of Development Low New in 2021 joining the NFIP Services
City of Livinaston
MultiHazard:
Dam Participation in
Incident,
1 Earthquake Countywide Public OES High Continue Not Started Education Flooding Program. Severe
Weather
Wildfire
2021-2026 Update Page 5-19
442
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners MultiHazard: Integrate Local
Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Community
2 Flooding Plan into Safety Development Medium Continue Not Started Severe Element of Agency
Weather General Plan.
Wildfire
Non-structural
3 Earthquake Earthquake Public Works Medium Continue Not Started Mitigation Outreach
Participate in
Countywide
4 Earthquake Inventory for Public Works Medium Continue Not Started Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
-
MultiHazard:
Earthquake Periodically review
5 Flooding buildings for Building Medium Continue Not Started Landslide update and Department Severe enhancements
Weather
Wildfire
6 Flooding Flood Insurance Planning High Continue Not Started Promotion Department Severe Severe Weather Livingston
7 Weather Preparedness Fire High Continue - in progress Camoaion Department
Promote Water
8 Drought Conservation Public Works High Continue In Progress Proqram
9 Flood Upgrade storm lift Public Works High New in 2021 station/SCAD A City of Los Banos
MultiHazard: Participate in Earthquake
1 Flooding Countywide Public OES / CEO's High Continue - In Progress Education Office Severe Program. Weather
Wildfire
MultiHazard: Integrate Local
Earthquake Hazard Mitigation Community
2 Flooding Plan into Safety Development Medium Continue - In Progress Severe Element of Agency
Weather General Plan.
Wildfire
202 1-2026 Update Page 5-20
443
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners Non-structural
3 Earthquake Earthquake Public Works Medium Continue - In Progress Mitigation Outreach
Participate in
Countywide
4 Earthquake Inventory for Public Works Medium Continue - In Progress Unreinforced
Masonrv Buildings
Multi- Periodically review
Hazard: building codes for
Earthquake updates and
5 Flooding enhancements Building Medium Continue - In Progress Severe and ensure Department
Weather necessary
Wildfire capabilities for
enforcement.
Participate in Los Banos
6 Severe Severe Weather Fire High Continue - In Progress Weather Preparedness Campaiqn. Department
Promote Water
7 Drought Conservation Public Works High Continue - In Progress Proaram
Implement and Los Banos
8 Wildfire Monitor Weed Fire High New in 2021 Abatement Program Department
Flooding, Prepare
9 Earthquake, Emergency Plan Public Works High New in 2021 for Critical Wildfire Infrastructure Perform BuildingSpecific Seismic
10 Earthquake Vulnerability Building High New in 2021 Assessment of Department City-Owned
Critical Facilities
Continue to
11 Flood Update Storm Public Works Medium New in 2021 Water System Master Plan
Flood, Prepare a Shelter Fire 12 Earthquake, and Emergency Department Medium New in 2021 Wildfire Provision Plan
Prepare Weather
13 Severe Preparedness Fire Medium New in 2021 Weather Program (Extreme Department Heat and Cold)
14 Drought Promote Water Public Works High New in 2021 Conservation 2021 -2026 Update Page 5-21
444
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners
Program with
continued
updates to Urban
Water
Manaqement Plan
Fire
Earthquake Rental Home Department/
15 Flood, Inspections Community High New in 2021
Wildfire Economic
Development
City of Merced
Flooding, Prepare an Energy 1 Earthquake, Assurance Plan Public Works High Continue Not Started Wildfire
Develop and
enhance storm
2 Flooding
water drainage Development High Continue In Progress improvements to Services reduce frequent
floodinq
Dam
Incidents, Create a Disaster Fire 3 Flooding, Preparedness Department High Continue Not Started Earthquake, Program
Wildfire
Support Merced
County efforts to
4 Flooding construct the Development Medium Continue Not Started Haystack Services Alternative of
Black Rascal Creek
Update the City's
5 Flooding
Storm water Development Medium Continue In Progress Drainage Master Services Plan
Dam
Incidents, Prepare a Shelter Fire
6 Flooding, and Emergency Department
Medium Continue Not Started
Earthquake, Provision Plan
Wildfire
Prepare a Natural Fire
7 Wildfire Area Fire Department Low Continue Not Started Prevention Plan
Perform buildingspecific, structural
seismic
8 Earthquake vulnerability Public Works Low Continue Not Started assessment of
City-owned
critical facilities
202 1-2026 Update Page 5-22
445
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Mitigation Strategy
ID Hazard(s) Project Title Lead Agency Priority Action Status Mitigated and Partners Create a program
to retrofit or
upgrade
unreinforced Development 9 Earthquake masonry buildings Low Continue Not Started in Downtown Services
Merced, or other
buildings in the
Plan area.
Update Fire
10 Earthquake Station 52 seismic Fire Low Continue Not Started and Flood and flood Department resiliency
Identify and open
additional cooling
zones and centers
Extreme within the City of Police 11 Heat Merced to provide Department Medium New in 2021 additional
capacity of
vulnerable
populations
Enhance the weed
abatement
program to
mitigate wildfire
risk. Use GIS to Fire identify properties Department - 12 Wildfire where mitigation Fire High New in 2021 is needed. Provide Prevention notice to owners,
and force clean
lots and pursue
cost recovery
expenses.
2021-2026 Update Page 5-23
446
ME[fCEak-------------- M_e_rc_e_d_C_olu_n~~~dM_ ul_~i-_Ju_r_is_di_ct~io_n_al_H_a_za_rd_ M~it~ig~at~io_n_P~la~n - ~ P an A option, Implementation, and Maintenance
COUNTY
6 PLAN ADOPTION, IMPLEMENTATION, AND MAINTENANCE
6.1 Adoption
DMA Requirements §201.6(c)(3):
[The local hazard mitigation plan shall include] documentation that the plan has been formally approved by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan (e.g., City Council, county commissioner, Tribal Council).
The purpose of formally adopting this plan is to secure buy-in from Merced County and the participating jurisdictions, raise awareness of the plan, and formalize the plan's implementation. The adoption of this plan completes Planning Step 9 of the 10-step planning process: Adopt the Plan. The governing board for each participating jurisdiction has adopted this Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by passing a resolution.
Implementation and maintenance of the plan is critical to the overall success of hazard mitigation planning. This is Planning Step 10 of the 10-step planning process. This section provides an overview of the overall strategy for plan implementation and maintenance, and outlines the method and schedule for monitoring, updating, and evaluating the plan. The section also discusses incorporating the plan into existing planning mechanisms and how to address continued public involvement.
6.2 Implementation
Once adopted, the plan faces the truest test of its worth: implementation. While this plan contains many worthwhile actions, the participating jurisdictions will need to decide which action(s) to undertake first.
Two factors will help with making that decision: the priority assigned the actions in the planning process and funding availability. Low or no-cost actions most easily demonstrate progress toward successful plan implementation.
Implementation will be accomplished by adhering to the schedules identified for each action (see Section 5 for county mitigation actions and the annexes for local mitigation actions), and through constant, pervasive, and energetic efforts to network and highlight the multi-objective, win-win benefits of each project to the Merced County community and its stakeholders. These efforts include the routine actions of monitoring agendas, attending meetings, and promoting a safe, sustainable community. The three main components of implementation are:
• Implement the action plan recommendations of this plan; • Utilize existing rules, regulations, policies and procedures already in existence; and • Communicate the hazard information collected and analyzed through this planning process so that the community better understands what can happen where, and what they can do themselves to be better prepared. Also, publicize the "success stories" that are achieved through the HMPT's ongoing efforts.
During implementation of these efforts, it is important to maintain a constant monitoring of funding opportunities that can be leveraged to implement some of the more costly recommended actions. This will include creating and maintaining a bank of ideas on how to meet local match or participation requirements, should grants be pursued. When funding becomes available, the participating jurisdiction's will be in a position to capitalize on the opportunity. Funding opportunities to be monitored include 2021-2026 Update Page 6-1
447
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance
special pre- and post-disaster funds, special district budgeted funds, state and federal earmarked funds, and other grant programs, including those that can serve or support multi-objective applications.
6.2.1 Role of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team in Implementation and Maintenance With adoption of this plan, the participating jurisdictions will be tasked with plan implementation and maintenance. The participating jurisdictions, led by the Merced County OES agree to:
• Act as a forum for hazard mitigation issues;
• Disseminate hazard mitigation ideas and activities to all participants; • Pursue the implementation of high-priority, low/no-cost recommended actions; • Keep the concept of mitigation in the forefront of community decision making by identifying plan recommendations when other community goals, plans, and activities overlap, influence, or directly affect increased community vulnerability to disasters;
• Maintain a vigilant monitoring of multi-objective cost-share opportunities to help the community implement the plan's recommended actions for which no current funding exists; • Monitor and assist in implementation and update of this plan; • Report on plan progress and recommended changes to the Merced County Board of Supervisors and the governing boards of the other participating jurisdictions; and • Inform and solicit input from the public.
The primary duty of the participating jurisdictions is to see the plan successfully carried out and to report to their community governing boards and the public on the status of plan implementation and mitigation opportunities. Other duties include reviewing and promoting mitigation proposals, considering stakeholder concerns about hazard mitigation, passing concerns on to appropriate entities, and posting relevant information on the county website (and others as appropriate).
6.3 Maintenance and Monitoring
Plan maintenance implies an ongoing effort to monitor and evaluate plan implementation and to update the p.lan as required or as progress, roadblocks, or changing circumstances are recognized. This section describes how public participation will be integrated throughout the plan maintenance and implementation process. It also explains how the mitigation strategies outlined in this plan will be incorporated into existing planning mechanisms and programs, such as comprehensive land use planning processes, CIP project planning and building code enforcement and implementation. The plan's format allows sections to be reviewed and updated when new data become available, resulting in a plan that will remain current and relevant.
6.3. 1 Maintenance Schedule
In order to track progress and update the mitigation strategies identified in the action plan, the HMPT will revisit this plan at the following times or occurrences:
• Annually, to assess if mitigation actions/projects have been completed; • Following a significant hazard event;
• Following a disaster declaration; or
• Any other time the HMPT sees it is prudent or necessary. 2021 -2026 Update Page 6-2
448
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance
Annual Reviews: The HMPT will meet annually to assess progress on plan implementation. Merced County's OES Department will facilitate these reviews and an associated meeting. The timing of the annual meeting is recommended for the first or second quarter of each year to identify potential mitigation grants, some of which have a submittal period in the fourth quarter. A template for the annual meeting and a summary report is provided in Appendix E. Another tool developed during the 2021 process to facilitate regular review and implementation and make the plan more of a "living document" is the LHMP website that includes a GIS/map based -interactive storyboard with highlights of the risk assessment, including interactive hazard maps and a web-based method for collecting, validating, updating and maintaining critical facilities for the plan. This website is accessible from the Merced County OES homepage.
Critical Facility Database Maintenance: Moving forward the County and its municipalities will maintain the critical facility database that was prepared during the 2021 update. The County's GIS Manager will lead periodic reviews of the database and assess the need for updates, leveraging the LHMP website and Arc-GIS Experience Builder Application noted above.
Five-Year Update: This plan will be updated, approved, and adopted within a five-year cycle as per Requirement §201.6(c)(4)(i) of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. Efforts to begin the update should begin no later than June 2025. The County will monitor planning grant opportunities from the CalOES and FEMA for funds to assist with the update. This may include submitting a Pre-Disaster Mitigation planning grant application. This grant should be submitted in 2024, as there is a three-year performance period to expend the funds, and there is no guarantee that the grant will be awarded when initially submitted. This allows time to resubmit the grant in subsequent years, if needed. Updates to this plan will follow the most current FEMA and CalOES planning guidance. The next plan update should be completed and reapproved by CalOES and FEMA Region VIII by September 2026.
6.3.2 Maintenance and Evaluation Process
The HMPT will continually observe the incorporation process, evaluation method, updating method, continued public participation, and completion of the action/projects to assure that the HMPT and the plan itself are performing as anticipated. By monitoring these processes, the HMPT will then be able to evaluate them at the time of the plan update, determining if any changes are needed.
The MJHMP plan update every five years provides an opportunity to determine whether there have been any significant changes in the county that may, in turn, necessitate changes in the types of mitigation actions proposed. New development in identified hazard areas, an increased exposure to hazards, the increase or decrease in capability to address hazards, and changes to federal or state legislation are examples of factors that may affect the necessary content of the MJHMP.
The plan review provides county officials with an opportunity to evaluate those actions that have been successful and to explore the possibility of documenting potential losses that were avoided due to the implementation of specific mitigation measures. The plan review also provides the opportunity to address mitigation actions that may not have been successfully implemented as assigned.
During the five-year plan update process, the following questions will be considered as criteria for assessing the effectiveness and appropriateness of the Plan:
• Do the goals address current and expected conditions? • Are the goals and objectives consistent with changes in State and Federal policy? • Complete status update on all mitigation projects. What strategies should be revised? • Has the nature or magnitude of risks changed (current and expected conditions)? • Are the current resources appropriate for implementing the LHMP? 202 1-2026 Update Page 6-3
449
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance
• Are there implementation problems, such as technical, political, legal or coordination issues with other agencies?
• Have the outcomes occurred as expected?
• Did the county and participating agencies and other partners participate in the plan implementation process as assigned?
The County of Merced is committed to involving the public in the continual reshaping and updating of the MJHMP, as discussed in subsection 6.3.4.
6.3.3 Incorporation into Existing Planning Mechanisms
Another important implementation mechanism that is highly effective and low-cost is incorporation of the hazard mitigation plan recommendations and their underlying principles into other county and city plans and mechanisms. Where possible, plan participants will use existing plans and/or programs to implement hazard mitigation actions. This plan should also be cross-referenced when related planning mechanisms are updated. As previously stated above, mitigation is most successful when it is incorporated into the day-to-day functions and priorities of government and development. As described in this plan's capability assessment and jurisdictional annexes, the County and participating jurisdictions already implement policies and programs to reduce losses to life and property from hazards. This plan builds upon the momentum developed through previous and related planning efforts and mitigation programs and recommends implementing actions, where possible, through these other program mechanisms.
These existing mechanisms include (but are not limited to) the following:
• County and local general plans (2030 General Plan)
• Community service district area plans and master plans • County and local emergency operations plans
• County and local ordinances
• Flood/stormwater management/master plans
• Community wildfire protection plans
• GSPs
• IRWMPs
• Stormwater Resource Plans
• Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs)
• CIPs
• Other plans and policies outlined in the capability assessments in the jurisdictional annexes • Other plans, regulations, and practices with a mitigation focus HMPT members involved in the updates to the planning mechanisms will be responsible for integrating the findings and recommendations of this plan with these other plans, programs, etc., as appropriate. As an action step to ensure integration with other planning mechanisms the County Office of Emergency Services Manager or designee will discuss this topic at the annual meeting of the HMPT described above in subsection 6.3.1. The HMPT will discuss where there are opportunities to incorporate the plan into other planning mechanisms and who would be responsible for leveraging those opportunities. HMPT members representing local jurisdictions will work with their jurisdictional planning teams to integrate their identified mitigation actions into their own local plans and programs. Efforts to integrate the hazard mitigation plan into local plans, programs, and policies will be reported on at the annual HMPT plan review meeting, and a record of successful integration efforts will be kept.
Efforts should continuously be made to monitor the progress of mitigation actions implemented through these other planning mechanisms and, where appropriate, their priority actions should be incorporated into updates of this hazard mitigation plan.
2021-2026 Update Page 6-4
450
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Plan Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance
Examples of a process for incorporation of the MJHMP into specific existing or upcoming planning mechanisms include:
• Each community (County, Atwater, City of Merced, Dos Palos, Gustine, Livingston, Los Banos) should adopt (by reference or incorporation) this MJHMP into the Safety Element of their General Plan(s), as encouraged by AB 2140. Evidence of such adoption (by formal, certified resolution) shall be provided to Cal OES and FEMA to become eligible or maintain eligibility for CDDA funding. Each jurisdiction has a specific mitigation action related to this process outlined in subsection 5.3. • Reference into the State of California CVFPP.
• Incorporation into the City of Merced Emergency Operations Plan and Fire Department Strategic Plan. • Incorporation into the City of Los Banos Emergency Operations Plan and Fire Department Strategic Plan.
• Referencing the HMP in the University of California Merced's Biosafety Manual and Emergency Operations Plan.
6.3.4 Continued Public Involvement
Continued public involvement is imperative to the overall success of the plan's implementation. Efforts will be made to involve the public in the plan maintenance, evaluation, and review process. This includes maintaining a digital version of the plan on the County OES website for public review. In addition, information on who to contact within the OES will be posted with the plan. The Merced County OES will maintain a file of comments received for reference during the next five-year update. Any revisions to the plan that may occur as a result of a disaster will also be made public and posted on the county website.
The next five-year update process also provides an opportunity to solicit participation from new and existing stakeholders and to publicize success stories from the plan implementation and seek additional public comment. A public hearing(s) or survey to receive public comment on the plan will be held during the plan update period. When the HMPT reconvenes for the update, they will coordinate with all stakeholders participating in the planning process, including those who joined the HMPT after the initial effort, to update and revise the plan. Public notice will be posted, and public participation will be invited, at a minimum, through available website postings and press releases to the local media outlets as well as email and social media announcements.
Public involvement strategies that were used during the 2021 planning process are captured in the Outreach Strategy in Appendix F. The appendix can serve as a reference for continued public involvement over the next several years and lays the foundation for outreach associated with the next formal five-year update.
2021-2026 Update Page 6-5
451
I
ME·o,c·r:n• ff Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ;.,~ Cj ~ -----------------"'---------Pla-n~A_d_o-pt-io-n COUNTY
7 PLAN ADOPTION
OMA Requirement §201.G(c)(S):
[The plan shall include .. .] Documentation that the plan has been formally adopted by the governing body of the jurisdiction requesting approval of the plan (e.g., City Council, County commissioner, Tribal Council).
7.1 Element E.1 Formal Adoption Documentation
Adoption by the local governing body demonstrates the community's commitment to implementing the mitigation strategy and authorizes responsible agencies to execute their actions. The final plan is not approved until Merced County and each participating jurisdiction adopts the plan and FEMA receives documentation of formal adoption by the governing body of each jurisdiction requesting approval. This plan is for Merced County, the unincorporated county, and its incorporated cities of Atwater, Livingston, Dos Palos, Gustine, Merced, and Los Banos.
Merced County and the six participating cities plan to submit this plan to the Merced County Board of Supervisors and their respective city councils upon successful completion of State and federal review and following the issuance of an Approved Pending Adoption (APA) designation from FEMA. This provides an efficient approval process if FEMA determines the MJHMP requires revisions because the County and each participating city can make these revisions prior to initiating the local plan adoption process.
Once FEMA issues APA notification, adoption by each participating jurisdiction must take place within one year for each jurisdiction to become or remain eligible for FEMA HMA program funding. Given this is a multi-jurisdictional planning process, Merced County will coordinate the adoptions of all six jurisdictions as soon as the plan receives APA status. Because each City's governing bodies have different meeting schedules, Merced County will also coordinate with each participating jurisdiction regarding the timing of their adoptions to submit adoption documentation to Cal OES and FEMA at the same time.
Once the County records and submits the adoption documentation to Cal OES and FEMA, FEMA will issue an official approval letter stating which jurisdictions have adopted and are approved and eligible for FEMA HMA program funding. The approval letter will include the expiration date five years from the date of the letter and attached to the approval letter will be a final FEMA Local Mitigation Plan Review Tool that provides feedback on the strengths of the plan, recommendations for plan improvements during future plan updates, and suggestions for implementing the mitigation strategy. 2021-2026 Update Page 7-1
452
l
ME·o c·r- , f:~ Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan '6.lr. ,,;;. ~ -----------------~~--- -----__..R_e-fe-re-n""'" ce-s COUNTY
8 REFERENCES
Arcuni, Peter, Rivers in the Sky: What You Need to Know About Atmospheric River Storms. KQED, Jan. 2019
California Accidental Release Prevention Program.California Climate Action Team (CAT) Heat Adaptation Workgroup, "Preparing California for Extreme Heat," October 2013 California Climate Adaptation Strategy 2018
California Department of Finance, 2015-2019 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-year estimates, U.S.
Census Bureau
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection website California Department of Water Resources, 2006, "Drought Preparedness." California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams, Jurisdictional Dams Database California Department of Water Resources, Water Conditions and Drought Report to Governor, 2009 California Department of Water Resources. www.water.ca.gov/.
California Emergency Management Agency, Disaster Recovery and Mitigation Handbook California Emergency Management Agency, Tools for Preparing your LHMP, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substance Control California Fire Plan, 2010
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services. Contingency Plan for Excessive Heat Emergencies. 2014.
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services. FY 2019-2020 Public Safety Power Shutoff Legislative Report.
California Governor's Office of Planning and Research. The Integrated Climate Adaption and Resiliency Program. Impact Report and 2020 Program Recommendations.
California Invasive Plant Council. https://www.cal-ipc.org/ California Megaflood: Lessons from a Forgotten Catastrophe. B. Lynn Ingram. Scientific American, January 1, 2013. https:Uwww.sci entifi cameri can.com/ article/ atmospheric-rivers-cal ifornia-megaflood-lessonsfrom-forgotten-catastrophe/ California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), Fourth Climate Change Assessment Report, 2018 California Public Utilities Commission
Center for Disease Control, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Social Vulnerability Index Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes, Atmospheric Rivers scale. http://cw3e.ucsd.edu/CW3EReleases-New-Scale-to-Characterize-Strength-and-lmpacts-of-Atmospheric-Rivers/ City of Atwater Emergency Plan, 2017.
City of Atwater Fire Department. City Fire Management Plan. 2021-2026 Update Page 8-1
453
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan City of Atwater General Plan. 2000
City of Dos Palos General Plan. 1991.
City of Dos Palos Local Emergency Operations Plan. 2003.
City of Gustine General Plan. 2002.
City of Livingston General Plan. 2020-2025.
City of Los Banos Emergency Plan. 2011.
City of Los Banos Fire Management Plan.
City of Los Banos General Plan. 2009
City of Merced 2030 General Plan. 2012.
City of Merced Emergency Response/Disaster Plan. 2011.
City of Merced Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015.
References
City of Merced Tentative Subdivision Activity List. May 2021. Prepared by the City of Merced Development Services Department. Accessed on December 10, 2021. Available at:
https://www.cityofmerced.org/home/ showpu bl i sheddocu ment/15200/63766197877 4630000 Department of Finance Data, Merced County 2012
Environmental Protection Agency, National Response Center Federal Emergency Management Agency, Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, 2011 FEMA Community Information System
FEMA, CRS Coordinators Manual
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, 2011 Flood Emergency Information Exchange
Flood Insurance Study, Merced County - FEMA, December 2, 2008 Flood Insurance Study, Merced County- FEMA, 2010
Gao Y, J Lu, LR Leung, Q Yang, S Hagos and Y Qian, 2015. "Dynamical and Thermodynamical Modulations on Future Changes of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers over Western North America." Geophysical Research Letters 42(17): 7179-7186. DOI: 10.1002/2015GL065435 Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Research Highlights. October 2015 https://www.pnnl.gov/science/highlights/highlight.asp?id=4106 Gray, E., Gilardoni, S., Baldocchi, D., McDonald, B. C., Facchini, M. C., & Goldstein, A.H. (2019). Impact of air pollution controls on radiation fog frequency in the Central Valley of California. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124, 5889-5905. https://doi .org/10.1029/2018JD029419 Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit Pre-Fire Management Plan, 2005 Merced County 2035 General Plan (2010, Amended 2016)
Merced County 2035 General Plan, Health and Safety Element (2012) Merced County Agricultural Commissioner's Report, 2019
Merced County Association of Government. Population Projections.
Merced County Emergency Operations Plan (2008)
2021-2026 Update Page 8·2
454
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Merced County Flood Management Ordinance
Merced County Merced County Code of Ordinances
Merced County Property Inventory, Merced County Assessor's Office Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Global Hydrology Resource Center https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/ home/ content/ atmospheric-rivers-and-lake-oroville-dam-stress National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI)
National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, U.S Drought Monitor National Drought Mitigation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Drought Impact Reporter National Flood Insurance Program, Community Status Book, 2020 National Inventory of Dams
References
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. What is the Pineapple Express? National Ocean Service website, https:ljoceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/pineapple-express.html, National Pipeline Mapping System National Register of Historic Places National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Wind Prospector National Center for Environmental Information (NCEI) National Weather Service website
Origins and Development: A Chronology of Disasters in California, California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse Database
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Energy Assistance Act, Section 322 SGCRP, 2016: The Impacts of Climate Change on Human Health in the United States: A Scientific Assessment. Crimmins, A., J. Balbus, J.L. Gamble, C.B. Beard, J.E. Bell, D. Dodgen, R.J. Eisen, N. Fann, M.D.
Hawkins, S.C. Herring, L. Jantarasami, D.M. Mills, S. Saha, M.C. Sarofim, J. Trtanj, and L. Ziska, Eds. U.S.
Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 312 pp.
Southwest Climate and Environmental Information Collaborative (SCENIC).
State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan (2018)
State of California Office of Historic Preservation
Topping, Ken. State Guidance for Hazard Mitigation Planning. California Polytechnic State University. State Hazard Mitigation Team Meeting. May 10, 2015
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Risk Management Agency Crop Indemnity Reports 2012-2020 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Sectary of Agriculture, Disaster Designations 2012-2020 U.S. Fish and Wildfire Service, San Luis National Wildlife Refuge.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Environmental Conservation Online System 2021-2026 Update Page 8-3
455
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan References
United States Geological Survey website
Western Regional Climate Center. https://wrcc.dri.edu/
2021-2026 Update Page 8-4
456
I
ME CED~ _______________ ____.'.cM~e~r~ce~d~C~o~u~n~ty~M~u~lt:!..: i-::!_! JU:!_!r~is~d!!!:ic:!!ti~o~na~l..!:H~a!!z~ar~d~M~iti~g~at~io~n~Pl~a~n c o u N T y Appendix A: Planning Team
Appendix A: Planning Team
2021-2026 Update
457
Agency/Jurisdiction Title
Merced County
Purchasing
Manager
Executive Office
(PIO)
Executive Office
Agricultural
Commissioner
Assistant
Agricultural
Commissioner
Deputy Ag
Commissioner
County Counsel
County Counsel
Assistant
County Counsel
Assistant CIO
Merced County Fire Captain
Planning and
Economic Director
Development
Office of Emergency Deputy Director
of Services/Cal FIRE Administration
Office of Emergency OES Assistant
Services/Cal FIRE Coordinator
Fire ChiefCal FIRE Madera/Mari po
sa/Merced
Counties
Environmental Health Environmental
Health
Environmental Health Environmental
Health
Hazardous
Environmental Health Materials
Specialist II
Public Health Director
Public Health Assistant Public
Health
Health
Public Health Education
Specialist
APPENDIX A: PLANNING TEAM
Name
Kim Nausin
Mike North
Alexandra Pierce
David A Robinson
Sean Runyon
Carrie Mitchell
Forrest Hansen
Steve Maxey
Tom Ebersole
John Nishihama
Mike Perez
Mark Hendrickson
David Scheurich
Greg Padilla
Mike van Loben Sels
Vicki Jones
Cesar Ramirez
Melissa Palomino
Rebecca Nanyonjo
Jessica MontoyaJuarez
Jaime Arteaga
Participating
Jurisdiction
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Meetings 1
Attended
Kick-off; Mtg. #3
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #4
Kick-off;
Kick-off;
Mtg. #2
Kick-off;
Kick-off; Mtg. #2;
Mtg. #3; Mtg. #4
Kick-off; Mtg. #2;
Mtg. #3; Mtg. #4
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3;
Mtg. #4
Kick-off;
Kick-off;
Mtg. #4
1 Those that are not listed as attending a meeting participated in the planning process in other ways such as emails, phone calls and face-to-face meetings with the County Project Manager and consultants.
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan A.I
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
458
Agency/Jurisdiction I Title N Participating Meetings 1
ame
Emergency Medical
Services
---·-·-··•·-~ ---- --- -·-- -- ·----·- .
Emergency Medical
Services
GIS
I EMS
i -~o~~~i_f!a!9r
j
! County EMS I
i i Manager
! · ·\ . .
Public Works
Public Works
--- _ !_ ~:!~:
Public Works
IT
Fire
: Assistant
I Director
: Administrative
Eng.
Division
Chief/Deputy
Director of
1 Operations -
---· _ i_ f~LJ_f!!Y.9.~S __ _
1 Tim Williams
- I ----- ---·------· I
' Jim Clark
l
i Gene Barrera
f-· -
! _[:)~~~ ~-:.~f_E:~de~ .
1 Mike Stephenson
Oscar Ortiz
Rob Kuhlemeir
i Mark Pimental
!
Office ofEducation ; Superintendent ; Steve Tietjen_ .. ., .. ·-·-· . ·-·-· ------••.•· - " -- (" · ···-···-··· ···· •---·-·· .. ~!f~~ ~!~~~~~~<:~ .. ..i. PIO ·····- ___ N~!~a-~-(:2~e~~:9?..
RIGGS Ambulance Administrative
. -~~p~~isor
i Chief of
Westside Ambulance Ambulance
Municipalities _
City of Atwater
! __ city of A_!W~ter
City of Atwater
, ·
! City of Atwater
qty o_f J\twater
City of Atwater
1 City of Dos Palos . -· --------- .. ••'•• · · --· --
I
j City of Dos Palos
I
City of Dos Palos
S~ty of Dos Palos
County of Merced
Acting Police
Chief
g tY, _t"'.1a_n~g:_r ..
Battalion Chief
..... i Executive to the
( Ci!>.'. .~~na_g~r_
! Public Works
Director
.,. .. ·- - --- --···- . .•
1 Public Works
.J Superintendent . _
: Police Chief
i Admin Assistant
... iJI __ . ·-·- ' i City_ Manager ··ii Police ChiefDesignated Emergency
Manager for
Dos Palos
I Interim Police
:_Qi~!. - ·-- ' Fire Marshal
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Dave Murphy
Michael Courtney
Cliff Battles
Lori Waterman
Bobby Ayuso
Janell Martin
, Greg Thompson
Justin Vinson
Mike Salvador
Christina Thurman
Darrell Fonseca
Richard McEachin
Cliff Battles
Dewayne Jones ·- - -·
Jurisdiction Stakeholder Attended
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Kick-off; Mtg #2;
. --~tg_: #? _
. .. -~-t_g:_~4
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3;
r:-A.!9: .#.1 __
Mtg. #4
-~~g~~2__; _~tg.~3- !
Mtg. #4
Kick-off;
Mtg. #3
Mtg. #3; Mtg. #4
Mtg. #3
Mt~. #3.i_ ~tg. !~
Mtg. #3
Mtg. #4
A.2
459
Agency/Jurisdiction I Title Name Participating I Meetings1 Jurisdiction Stakeholder I Attended
City of Gustine City Manager Douglas Dunford X
Public
City of Gustine Information Jami Westervelt
Officer X
Police Chief -
Designated
City of Gustine Emergency Jim Markel
Manager for
Gustine X
City of Gustine Fire Chief Pat Berrellii X Mtg. #2 ~
City of Gustine Police Ruben Chavez Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Department X Mtg. #3
City of Livingston City Manager Jose Antonio
Ramirez X
Police Chief -
Designated
City of Livingston Emergency 1 John Markle
Manager for
Livingston X
City of Livingston Public Works Anthony Chavarria X
Adminstrative
City of Livingston Analyst - Public Adabel Pirita Mtg. #3 Works X
City of Livingston City Manager Tony Avina X Mtg. #3; Mtg. #4 Administrative
City of Livingston Analyst - Public Martha Abeloe Mtg. #3 Works X
City of Los Banos City Manager Alex Terrazas X
Public
City of Los Banos Information Jason Hedden
Officer X
Community and
City of Los Banos Economic Stacy Souza Elms Kick-off; Mtg. #2 Development Mtg. #3
Director X
Fire Chief -
Designated
City of Los Banos Emergency Mason Hurley Kick-off; Mtg. #4 Manager for Los
Banos X
City of Merced City Manager Stephanie Dietz +
Public
City of Merced Information Mike Conway
Officer
City of Merced Deputy Chief - Casey Wilson Kick-off; Mtg. #2; Fire Department Mtg. #3
Fire Chief -
City of Merced Designated Derek Parker Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3 Emergency
County of Merced A.3
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
460
Agency/Jurisdiction
i i-
-
Manager for
Merced
i Special Districts r· ---------··--------·
--------······ -------------- i Turlock Irrigation ! Emergency t ~:!~~~ Irrigation ----·t ~~~;=~~ss _
! [?_~st_r_i~t __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _.: ~r~pare.gn~~s_
Ballico Community Board President
Water Service District
! Maintenance ;_Supervisor ___ _ Delhi County Water
Lower San Joaquin i Executive
~~y_e~-------- _______ __ i _Q_i_r_~~t~~ ---...
San Joaquin Valley Air
District
! Compliance
: Manager ..
i Scientist .-l- -- - . -
State and Federal Contacts -D~p~·rt;,;,~~t~f W~t~~ I . . ..• ·- . ··-
! Engineer WR
Resources l
. f. E~~~g~~~y
Cal OES i Services Inland
i ~E!gio~ \(
! Emergency
Cal OES Service
Coordinator
CHP Sergeant
Warning
Jason S. Hicks
Peter Wade
Lyndal Hibdon
Reggie Hill
Ron Giannone
John Lambie
Nathan Hicks
Walt Kent
Joanne Gurrola
: Luis Lara
; NOAA Coordination ! Jerald Meadows
i ?!~!e_ Parks
i State Parks - Four
i Rivers Sector I . ·-- ... -
! St~!e ~~-rks
State Parks
ty'l~te()rologist
District
Environmental
. Coordinator
Neighboring Jurisdictions and Academia - -.------ -~- - --- -- UC Merced
UC Merced
Mariposa County
Sheriff
Mariposa County
Sheriff
Mariposa County
Sheriff
Madera County
~~~ri!f ~ __ S_erge~mt
County of Merced
Emergency
Manager
Police Chief
Emergency -~_anage.~.
i Emergency
i Manager 'i' -- - - ·--··- ·-. -··-
i Emergency
i Manager
••1--••• -•---~~H
j Emergency
Manager __ _ _
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
Gerald Heberling
Christopher Jou
Heather Reith
Andrew Collum
Laura Rodriguez
Mascorro
Chou Her
Kevin Packard
Alyssa Carroll
Wes Smith
Joseph Wilder
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
!
1 .. ------ [
j Mtg. #3; Mtg. #4
. "("· -- ·----------- 1
! Kick-off; Mtg. #2; _l\1.!g:#3 ____ _
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3;
Mtg.#4
Mtg. #3
Kick-off; Mtg. #3
Kick-off; Mtg. #2
Kick-off;
Kick-off; Mtg. #2; -~1t9: #3; M_tg. #4_
Mtg. #2
Mtg. #2; Mtg. #3
Kick-off;
A.4
461
Agency/Jurisdiction Title Name .. Stanislaus County Emergency Melba Hibbard OES Manager X
Other Stakeholders
Disaster
Red Cross Program Helen Cosentino
Manager -
Kick-off; Mtg. #3;
Mtg. #4
Merced X
Red Cross District Chair Irene Johnson
Merced Co X Mtg. #4
Red Cross Beverly Brewster
Merced County Food Executive Bill Gibbs
Bank Director
Merced Medical Marianne Shaw
Center
PG&E Senior Public Deron Mills
Safety ?pecialist
i X
t X Mtg. #3
l X Kick-off;
X Kick-off; Mtg. #3
Wood Project Manager Jeff Brislawn
Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Mtg. #3
Wood Assistant Project Juliana Prosperi Manager
Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Mtg. #3; Mtg. 4
Hazard
Wood Mitigation Amy Carr
Planner
Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Mtg. #3
Hazard
Wood Mitigation Chris Johnson
Planner
Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Mtg. #3
Hazard
Wood Mitigation Pujeeta Chowdhary Mtg. #2
Planner
Wood
GIS Analyst/ Mack Chambers Planner
Kick-off; Mtg. #2,
Mtg. #3
County of Merced A.5
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
462
f
MEfJ...CE~-------------------'-M~e~r~ce~d~C~o~u~n~~L...:.,;. M~u~lt~i-~Ju~r~is~d~ic~ti~on~a~l~H~a=za~r~d~M~i~ti~g~at~io~n~P~l~an~ Appendix B: Planning Process Documentation
COUNTY
Appendix 8: Planning Process Documentation
2021-2026 Update
463
LETTER OF COMMITMENT
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
750 BELLEVUE ROAD
A.WATER . CALIFORNIA 95301
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) July 08, 2019
California Governor's Office of Emergency
Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650 Schriever Avenue
RE: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201 .6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Atwater is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Atwater has agreed to participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthermore, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Atwater, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201 .6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Atwater understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, including, but not limited to:
• Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
• The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction.; • Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan ; and, 464
• Fonnal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan).
Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Lori Waterman, commit City of Atwater to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.
This document is executed this eighth day of July 2019.
Please contact Fire Battalion Chief John Slate at (209) 761-6520 and/or [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely,
Lori Waterman
City Manager
(209) 357-6300
[email protected]
2 465
DOiPalos
CITY HALL-- 2174 BLOSSOM STREET
DOS PALOS, CALIFORNIA 93620
PHONE (209) 392-2174
FAX (209) 392-2801
LETTER OF COMMITMENT
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) June 26, 2019
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650 Schriever Avenue
RE: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA} Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Dos Palos is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Dos Palos has agreed to participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthermore, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Dos Palos, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Dos Palos understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning Handbook. including, but not limited to:
• Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
• The formulation of mitigation goals responsive ta public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; • Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan).
466
DOiPalos
CITY HALL -- 2174 BLOSSOM STREET
DOS PALOS, CALIFORNIA 93620
PHONE (209) 392-2174
FAX (209) 392-2801
Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Darrell Fonseca, commit City of Dos Palos to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.
This document is executed this 26 day of June, 2019.
Please contact Darrell Fonseca at 209-392-2174 or [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely,
G~~LDarrell Fonseca
City Manager
209-392-2174
209-392-2801
[email protected]
467
CITY Of GUSTINE
LETTER OF COMMITMENT
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) July I. 2019
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650 Schriever Avenue
RE: l.cllcr of Commitment as Panicipating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multi-jurisdictional 1-lazard Mitigation Planning
Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better re~olved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Gustine is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Gustine has agreed lo participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthem10re, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Gustine, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary anJ in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Gustine understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FD,1A':; I ornl Mit111ation Plannin.• I landhook . including, hut not limited to; • Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
• The formulation of mitigation goal< responsive to public input :ind development of mitigation act,ons complement~· to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each junsd,ction. · • Oemons1ration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process. attending meetings, contributing research. data, or other information. commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction·s governing body (each jurisdiciion must officially adopt the plan).
Therefore, with a full understanding of the ohligations incurred hy participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Patrick Borrelli, commit City of Gustine to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort
468
This document is executed this I" day of July, 2019.
Please contact Patrick Borrelli at (209) 587-5749 or [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely,
Patrick Borrelli
Fire Chief
(209) 587-5749
(209) 854-2840
[email protected]
469
June 19, 2019
City of Livingston
1416 C Street
Livingston, CA 95334
LEITER OF COMMITMENT
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650SchrieverAvenue
RE : Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning
Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Livingston is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Livingston has agreed to participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthermore, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Livingston, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Livingston understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, including, but not limited to:
• Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
• The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; • Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any
CITY OF LIVINGSTON
1416 "C" Street LIVINGSTON CALIFORNIA 95334 PHONE: (209)394-8041 FAX: (209) 394-4190 www.livingstoncity.com
470
planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body ( each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan).
Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Jose Antonio Ramirez, commit City of Livingston to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.
This document is executed this 28th day of June, 2019.
Please contact Jose Antonio Ramirez at (209) 398-1721, [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely,
9'.":f
Jose Antonio Ramirez
City Manager
(209) 394-8041 ext. 113
[email protected]
471
CITY OF LOS BANOS .............................................•...•.....•.............................
Proudly serving the Citizens of Los Banos with
'J{o,wr integrity - Compassion
Since 1890
FIRE DEPARTMENT
LETTER OF COMMITMENT
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) July 1, 2019
California Governor's Office of Emergency Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650 Schriever Avenue
RE: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning
Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Los Banos is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Los Banos has agreed to participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthermore, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Los Banos, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Los Banos understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, including, but not limited to:
• Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
333 ih Street • Los Banos, CA 93635
Telephone (209) 827-7025 • Fax (209) 827-7028
472
• The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; • Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body ( each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan).
Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I, Fire Chief Mason Hurley, commit City of Los Banos to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.
This document is executed this First day of July, 2019.
Please contact Fire Chief Mason Hurley at (209) 827-7025 or email [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely,
~~ Mason Hurley /
Fire Chief
0: (209) 827-7025
Fax: (209) 827-7028
[email protected]
473
CITY F RCED "Gateway to Yosemite "
LETTER OF COMMITMENT
(FOR MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANS) July 1, 2019
California Governor's Office of Emergency
Services
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
3650SchrieverAvenue
RE: Letter of Commitment as Participating Jurisdiction in Merced County Multijurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning Dear State Hazard Mitigation Officer:
As the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Local Mitigation Plan requirements under 44 CFR §201.6 specifically identify criteria that allow for multi-jurisdictional mitigation plans and that many issues are better resolved by evaluating hazards more comprehensively by coordinating at the county, regional, or watershed level, the City of Merced is submitting this letter of commitment to confirm that City of Merced has agreed to participate in the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning.
Furthermore, as a condition of participation in the mitigation planning, City of Merced, agrees to meet the requirements for mitigation plans identified in 44 CFR §201.6 and to provide such cooperation as is necessary and in a timely manner to the Merced County to complete the plan in conformance with FEMA requirements.
City of Merced understands that it must engage in the following planning process, as more fully described in FEMA's Local Mitigation Planning Handbook, including, but not limited to:
• Identification of hazards unique to the jurisdiction and not addressed in the master planning document; • The conduct of a vulnerability analysis and an identification of risks, where they differ from the general planning area;
• The formulation of mitigation goals responsive to public input and development of mitigation actions complementary to those goals. A range of actions must be identified specific for each jurisdiction. ; • Demonstration that there has been proactively offered an opportunity for participation in the planning process by all community stakeholders (examples of participation include relevant involvement in any 678 West 18th Street • Merced, California 95340
474
planning process, attending meetings, contributing research, data, or other information, commenting on drafts of the plan, etc.); and
• Documentation of an effective process to maintain and implement the plan; and, • Formal adoption of the Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the jurisdiction's governing body (each jurisdiction must officially adopt the plan).
Therefore, with a full understanding of the obligations incurred by participating in the FEMA hazard mitigation planning process as a participant in a multi-jurisdictional plan; I Steve Carrigan, commit City of Merced to the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Planning effort.
This document is executed this 1st day of July, 2019.
Please contact Fire Chief Billy Alcorn at (209) 388-8541 and/or [email protected] with questions.
Sincerely, 7-~
Steve Carrigan
City Manager
(209) 385-6834 Office
(209) 723-1780 fax
[email protected]
475
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Importance:
Scheu rich, David@CALFIRE <[email protected]> Friday, November 27, 2020 5:27 PM
Scheurich, David@CALFIRE; Perez, Michael@CALFIRE; Prosperi, Juliana; Brislawn, Jeff P
Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigat ion Plan Update Kick Off Meeting
High
CAUTION : External email. Please do not click on links/attachments unless you know the content is genuine and safe.
Good afternoon and Happy Holidays!!
As we have spoken in the past, Merced County has been working on a Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update. As I am sure everyone is aware, the hazard mitigation planning process is heavily dependent on the participation of representatives from local government agencies and departments, the public, and other stakeholder groups. As we have seen very recently, grant requirements and guidelines are changing rapidly, and this is an important document to help the County and Cities obtain funding and/or reimbursement. As this plan develops, the participant list will also grow.
You are invited to the first of 4 planning meetings to update the Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. The existing plan was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 which requires all local governments to develop a plan to assess their risks to hazards and identify actions that can be taken in advance to reduce future losses. Hazard mitigation plans are to be updated every five years in order to maintain eligibility for FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance grants. Merced County has hired a consultant, Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions , Inc. , to manage the planning project.
A Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) will be re-convened to support this project and will include representatives from the County and municipalities as participating jurisdictions. Other interested stakeholders, including local and regional agencies involved in hazard mitigation activities or agencies that regulate development, are also invited. This includes special districts, private-non-profit entities, business partners, academic institutions, and other local, state, and federal agencies in or that serve Merced County.
A Microsoft Outlook meeting invitation/calendar item will be sent out soon; please confirm your attendance or provide contact information for your designated alternate. Please" Reply To All" with your response on this initial email.
\Mlat: Merced County Multi-jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update \Nhere : Virtual - Kickoff Meeting/Webinar - Microsoft Teams \Nhen: December 16, 2020 10:00 - 12:00
Click here to join the meeting
Or call in (audio only - only for use if computer audio is not an option) +1 281-810-1627 . .212693756# United States , Houston
476
(866! 670-1764 212693756# United States (Toll-free)
Phone Conference ID: 212 693 756#
At the kickoff meeting, we will discuss the benefits of updating the hazard mitigation plan, the project schedule, and all of the hazards that affect Merced County, such as wildfire, floods, winter storms, landslides, and more. Merced County requests your assistance in forwarding this invitation to others in your jurisdiction. Appropriate persons to be a part of the planning committee include, but are not limited to: county and municipal planners, public works directors, floodplain managers, economic development directors, GIS staff, first responders, local government administration, elected officials, business partners, private-non-profit representatives, and school district representatives. Each participating jurisdiction must have at least one representative at the meetings to meet participation requirements. There will be 4 total primary planning meetings held during the update process over the next 5-6 months, with target submittal of the updated plan for State and FEMA review within 8 months.
The consultant, Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc., will be helping to manage the planning project. Wood will facilitate the planning process, assist with coordination, collect the necessary data, and perform other technical services, including updating the risk assessment and plan document.
However, to successfully complete this project and ensure your organization is eligible for FEMA hazard mitigation assistance funding, we need your participation and input.
Link to 2015 Merced Hazard Mitigation
Plan: https://app.box.com/s/k84itkq 1 n 7aec3ygofpti0qjrd qw2avk Thank you everyone in advance for your participation, this program is cannot be successful without it. As always, please let me know if you have any questions.
David Scheurich - Battalion Chief
Deputy Director - Administration
Merced County Office of Emergency Services
3500 N Apron Ave Atwater, CA 95301
Office (209) 385-7548 ext4866 Fax (209) 725-0174
Cell (209) 761-1972
David ,Scheurich t@f ire.ca.gov
CAL FIRE
Madera-Mariposa-Merced Unit
•Serving the citizens i n Mad era County , Mariposa County, Merced County, the City of Mad era & the City of Atwater 477
wood.
HMPT Meeting #1 Agenda
Date: 16 Dec 2020
10:00 am - noon PST
Meeting at: Virtual/Webinar - Microsoft Teams (see
email/Outlook for link)
Project: Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Subjec;t/Purpose
The purpose of the meeting is to introduce the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 and summarize the hazard mitigation planning process that will be used to update the plan. The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is intended to identify hazards, assets at risk, and ways to reduce impacts through long-term sustainable mitigation projects.
1. Introductions
2. Hazard Mitigation, Mitigation Planning and the Disaster Mitigation Act Requirements
3. Role of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) and Benefits of Participation
4. Objectives and Schedule for the Plan Update and Overview of 2015 Plan
5. Review and Identification of Natural and Human-Caused Hazards
6. Coordination with Stakeholders, Related plans, and Recent Studies
7. Planning for Public Involvement
8. Initial Information Needs and Next Steps
9. Questions and Answers
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
wood pie.com
478
wood.
M erced County HMPT Meeting #1 Minutes
Date: 16 December 2020 10:00 am - noon PST
Meeting at: Virtual/Webinar - Microsoft Teams
Written by: Jeff Brislawn CNood, Project Manager), Juliana Prosperi (Wood, Assistant Project Manager) Subject: Merced County MJHMP Update Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Meeting #1
Present:
David Scheurich (Merced County Office of Emergency Services, Assistant Director of Administration, County Lead for HMPT)
Mike Perez (Merced County, Fire Captain)
Gene Barrera (Merced County, GIS Manager)
Nathan Quevaedo (Merced County Office of Education, Communications Manager) Mike North (Merced County Public Information Officer)
Cesar Ramirez (Merced County Division of Environmental Health) Melissa Palomino (Merced County Division of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Specialist II)
Tom Ebersole (Merced County, Assistant County Counsel)
Steve Maxey (Merced County, Community and Economic Development) Greg Padilla (Merced County, Fire Department)
Stacy Souza Elms (City of Los Banos, Community and Economic Development Director) Mason Hurley (City of Los Banos Fire Department, Fire Chief) Casey Wilsqn (City of Merced Fire Department)
Ruben Chavez (City of Gustine Police Department)
Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro (UC-Merced Emergency Manager)
Marianne Shaw (Merced Medical Center)
Joseph Wilder (Madera County Sheriff/Office of Emergency Services) Helen Cosentino (American Red Cross, Disaster Program Manager: Merced/San Benito) Nathan Hicks (California DWR, Flood Operations Center, Engineer) Andrew Collum (California Department of State Parks, District Environmental Coordinator) Heather Reith (California Department of State Parks)
Jerald Meadows (National Weather Service, Warning Coordination Meteorologist) Deren Mills (Pacific Gas & Electric, Public Safety Specialist) Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
479
wood.
AGENDA TOPICS
This document is a record of attendance and a summary of the topics discussed at the above meeting including the following:
1. Introductions
Mr. Scheu rich kicked off the meeting and thanked everyone for joining and explained the MJHMP is a valuable and important plan for the County have in place. Mr. Perez introduced himself as Mr. Scheurich's assistant on the project. Mr. Brislawn provided an overview of the agenda and what the team will talk about today. He introduced the Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. r,Nood) team and said they will support Merced County during the planning process and document preparation as the project consultant. He asked that the participants write their name and the agency they represent in the chat box. The participant attendance list is shown above. Mr. Brislawn also provided a link to a virtual poll that asked whether the team has participated in the planning process for a Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). Most of the group have not participated on a MJHMP (63%).
2. Hazard Mitigation, Mitigation Planning and the Disaster Mitigation Act Requirements Mr. Brislawn began a discussion about the hazard mitigation planning process. Mitigation is one of four phases of emergency management cycle. Mitigation and preparedness build resilience in communities and reduce response and recovery costs. He introduced the concept of a "sustained" action - such as managing your floodplains wisely so that development and infrastructure is not put at risk in such areas.
Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000
Mr. Brislawn explained the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 which requires having an updated plan in place to ensure the County is eligible for pre- and post-disaster hazard mitigation grant funds. There are trends resulting in increased costs for disaster response and recovery related to population growth and the increase in the types of events we experience as a community. The COVID-19 pandemic a good example of a circumstance that can cause disruption in our community and to the economy. Mr. Brislawn explained we need these plans for several reasons because the reduce future recovery costs, we can plan around predictive events, and they guide mitigation activities in a coordinated manner.
Planning Process
Mr. Brislawn explained that previous Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance broke the planning process into 4 phases. We are in Phase 1 and next steps will be developing an outreach strategy and reviewing County capabilities. We will then move into Phase 2, which will involve conducting a Risk Assessment. Phase 3 involves developing a mitigation strategy.
Phase 4 involves final plan adoption and implementation and ensuring the adopted plan builds a Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
480
wood.
safer and more resilient community. FEMA's most recent guidance breaks down the planning process into a 9-step planning framework.
Phase 1 will involve building a planning team with the County and participating jurisdictions. This phase involves working with other agency stakeholders, specifically those agencies that are already involved with emergency management or mitigation activities. There are several special districts that have direct involvement in levee maintenance, water conservation, and community services. These are some of the agencies we reach out to for input during the planning process.
Public Involvement
FEMA requires we provide two opportunities for public involvement during the planning process:
during the draft stage and prior to plan approval. Public involvement will include online surveys and workshops during the planning effort, and will look to the participating jurisdictions to assist with advertising these opportunities. Our team will be responsible for documenting this process; this may involve documenting specific meetings with stakeholders or other organizations. Mr.
Brislawn asked the group if there were any questions.
Phase II: Risk Assessment
Mr. Brislawn discussed the three components of the risk assessment. He covered what natural hazards we look at in the assessment and how those hazards overlap with community assets. He discussed where there is overlap between the hazards and assets is where we have risk (e.g. potential for losses).
The vulnerability assessment looks at a range of assets in the County: residential/commercial structures and critical facilities and infrastructure. Our team will align this update with the recent FEMA Community Lifeline framework. Understanding risks to lifeline facilities, and identifying ways to minimize those risk with mitigation actions, will better position the plan for grant funding. He also stated we will look at development trends and natural resource areas in terms of assets that may warrant protection from hazard impacts.
Mitigation Capability Assessment
Mr. Brislawn explained that the team will examine existing policies and programs and evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation gaps and shortfalls to see where there are areas for improvement. He stated our team will also look at the County's fiscal abilities to understand where there could be funding options for mitigation not limited to grants.
Mitigation Strategy
The Mitigation Strategy begins with reviewing the plan's existing goals, which are broad overarching statements of what we want to achieve. Goals are supported by mitigation actions, Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
481
wood.
which are specific and measurable. Mr. Brislawn stated the team will rely on different reference guides for mitigation action alternatives, such as FEMA's Mitigation Ideas and the National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (NFIP CRS) guidance. There is also related guidance from the State of California in the 2020 Adaptation Planning Guide.
Goals from 2014 MJHMP
Mr. Brislawn reviewed the existing 2014 MJHMP goals. He noted they include common types of goals we see in these plans. We will have an opportunity to further review and revise these goals in future meetings.
Actions in 2014 MJHMP
Mr. Brislawn shared the current actions from the existing plan. Mr. Brislawn noted we will need to get a status update on the actions during this planning update. He also noted that if the County does not want to pursue an existing action, the County will need to provide reasoning on why.
An action status form will be provided to capture this input at a later date.
Mitigation Alternatives
Mr. Brislawn stated that the team will need to review and select the alternatives for new actions as part of the plan update process. Each jurisdiction will need at least one new action, and actions will need to be prioritized. We will do this by applying selection and prioritization criteria, such as whether it will work, is it cost-beneficial, affordable, legal, and fair etc. This process will occur at a future planning meeting.
Plan Adoption and Implementation
The participating jurisdictions will need to readopt the plan to secure the buy-in for the process.
In terms of implementation, Mr. Brislawn explained there will need to be an assigned Hazard Mitigation Manager to track the projects. A lot of this work will be related to ongoing work plans and efforts, so it ties in tandem with other existing department and agency partners' work.
California Legislation
Mr. Brislawn summarized various California legislation that formally links the MJHMP into other planning documents, such as the General Plan. By amending the MJHMP into the General Plan Safety Element in accordance with AB 2140 participating jurisdictions can achieve a higher share of disaster recovery costs from the State.
3. Role of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPTI and Benefits of Participation For participating jurisdictions, the requirements are that we need to document your participation and we need to show this documentation to the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and FEMA reviewers, so meeting attendance is key. If you cannot make it, Mr. Brislawn Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
482
wood.
explained that he recommends an alternate attend in your place so we can still show participation. He also said that the jurisdictions should review and complete planning documents and worksheets. The participating jurisdictions also coordinate the final adoption of the plan.
Mr. Brislawn noted that as the consultant we are here to help facilitate the process and do the heavy lifting for the risk assessment and technical portions, but we really want this to be your plan and that is why it is key to get your input. Mr. Brislawn asked if there were any questions on the roles of the HMPT.
Mr. Brislawn described other "stakeholders" as entities that may be involved in hazard mitigation or emergency management activities that are not going to formally adopt the plan. This can include other local, regional, state or federal government agencies, private, private non-profit, and educational institutions. Mr. Brislawn said if you are a stakeholder you have options to participate. One of them is to participate in the meetings and to provide comments on the plan.
4. Objectives and Schedule for the Plan Update and Overview of 2015 Plan Mr. Brislawn explained we are reconvening the HMPT and updating the plan based on the latest federal requirements and California requirements. The built environment and hazard concerns in communities do change, so we conduct a substantial update to the risk assessment.
The next meeting will focus on the Risk Assessment, which will require the Wood team to conduct the assessment itself and complete the analysis. Other forthcoming deliverables include the public survey.
We will aim to schedule the next meeting in mid-March; the date in the calendar is tentative for now, but a target and we will try to find a date that works for everyone. Mr. Brislawn stated that as a consultant we will provide the tools to the County and jurisdictions to be successful and ensure the planning requirements are met.
5. Review and Identification of Natural and Human-Caused Hazards Ms. Prosperi defined the Planning Area as the Merced County limits, but noted we also consider regional hazards in Central Valley that could impact the County. Mr. Brislawn added that a regional hazard may include dam failures associated with dams located outside the County limits with the potential to inundate portions of the County. Ms. Prosperi provided an overview of potential other hazards of concern - both natural and human-caused that could be addressed in the plan. She provided a list based on the California State Hazard Mitigation Plan and explained those in bold are the hazards currently addressed in the 2014 MJHMP.
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.corn
483
wood.
Ms. Prosperi shared a virtual poll link with the group and asked everyone to complete the survey; The final results are listed below with the top five priority hazards bolded:
• Flooding (80%)
• Drought (73%)
• Pandemic/Epidemic (60%)
• Dam Failure (53%)
• Earthquake (40%)
• Hazardous Material Releases (40%)
• Power Outages (33%)
• Subsidence (27%)
• Wildfires (27%)
• Cyber Threats (20%)
• Severe Weather (20%)
• Erosion (7%)
• Landslides/Debris Flows (7%)
• Oil Spills (7%)
• Expansive Soils (0%)
• FueIShortages~%)
Ms. Prosperi asked the group if there were any other natural or human-caused hazards they should consider assessing in the plan. Mr. Scheurich mentioned civil unrest may be a concern, as well as cyber threats. He stated it may be valuable to the County to address cyber threats in the plan, based on where things are trending. He noted there was a substantial and recent cyberattack in the past month that impacted numerous health facilities and compromised their computer system for up to a month. Pandemic/Epidemic should also be included based on the current COVID19 outbreak and widespread impacts.
6. Coordination with Stakeholders, Related plans, and Recent Studies Ms. Prosperi provided an overview of Merced County's existing mitigation capabilities starting with the 2030 Merced County General Plan through a broad summary of relevant regional plans, such as the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) Merced-MariposaMadera Fire Unit Strategic Plan. Mr. Brislawn asked whether there have been any recent studies on the hazards listed in the County in the past few years.
Mr. Wilson stated the City of Merced recently prepared a Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Study in 2018. The Merced County Economic Development Department stated the Climate Action Plan will be done by 2021. The County also recently updated the Zoning Code in 2019.
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
484
wood.
It was noted that UC-Merced was applying for an NSF grant for planning for energy resilience in regards to natural disasters.
It was also noted that county departments had recently completed COOP-COG plans.
Mr. Brislawn stated that during the process his team will ask the participants and stakeholders whether they have integrated any of the past planning efforts into the current MJHMP, such as whether the MJHMP was amended into the General Plan. Mr. Scheurich stated he will determine whether the 2014 plan was amended into the 2030 General Plan Safety Element.
7. Planning for Public Involvement
Ms. Prosperi provided an overview of outreach and engagement tools used in the planning process. Mr. Scheurich stated the silver linings of the pandemic is how the County has been able to enhance outreach to different communities in Merced. Ms. Prosperi explained how this planning process can piggyback on other planning efforts that recently occurred or those still underway in the County.
Ms. Prosperi indicated that other Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) mentioned to reach out to during the process may include the senior population, students, agricultural community, and the Latino population. Successful outreach to these groups may involve separate meetings we will want to capture during the planning process. Participants mentioned the City of Los Banos is updating their General Plan and they can share the Public Survey and leverage a monthly newsletter as part of their outreach.
8. Initial Information Needs and Next Steps
Mr. Brislawn discussed the Plan Update Guide (to be provided after the meeting) and next steps in the planning process and asked the group if there were any other questions.
9. Questions and Answers
The meeting adjourned at 11:40 a.m.
1 O. Post-Meeting Discussion
After the meeting, Mr. Scheu rich mentioned other potential hazard concerns facing Merced County. He stated the groundwater table is lowering substantially more on the western part of the County (Planada area) compared to the central part of the County, which is exacerbating subsidence in the area. He noted a temporary declaration related to impacted water tanks (25,000-gallon tank replacements) associated with subsidence and drought hazards. Mr. Brislawn said they dealt with the subsidence issue in Fresno County and its effect on flooding and levees.
Mr. Brislawn asked whether the County deals with tree mortality. Mr. Scheu rich stated this is not an issue because the County is fairly flat, and mostly grassland.
Wood Environment & Infrastructure. Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
485
wood.
Mr. Scheurich said the County has recently tracked and pursued State Homeland Security Grants related to cyber threats. He does not want to necessarily want to focus on cyber threats, but the grant funding is transitioning in this direction. He also noted that 50 percent of the population does not have GED, 85 percent of school population on school lunch program, so outreach and grant funding may need to target socially vulnerable communities in the County.
IMAGE: Screenshot of Meeting
wood.
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation
Plan
H,nard Mitigation Pl,mning Team Meeting #'1
Decembe, 16. 2020
Attachment: Meeting Chat Log
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
486
Attachment: Meeting Chat Log
• For those who ·oined in the last 15 minutes ... b Pros eri, Juliana Prosperi, Juliana
10:35 AM
For those who joined in the last 15 minutes, can you write your name and the agency your re resent in the Chat? Thanks.
• 8:or id:249d9198-2b69-4f51-bf99-6844758a85fe ·oined the meetin .
Wilson, Case ·oined the meetin .
• 8:teamsvisitor:8885d9e89aa84357ae79bfb2e771591b ·oined the meetin .
Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) joined the meeting. • 8:or id:c4c36458-a976-4a3c-953d-289d45a9a8f7 ·oined the meetin .
Reith, Heather@Parks joined the meeting.
Case Wilson, Ci of Merced Fire De artmen b Wilson, Case Wilson, Casey
10:47 AM
Case Wilson, Cit of Merced Fire Department
Ruben Chavez, Gustine PD b Ruben and Samm Gusitine PD (Guest) Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest)
10:47 AM
Ruben Chavez, Gustine PD
487
Marianne Shaw Mere Medical Center b marianne Shaw
marianne Shaw (Guest)
10:48 AM
Marianne Shaw Mere Medical Center
Joseph Wilder, Madera Coun Sheriff's /OES b Jose h Wilder - Madera (Guest) Joseph Wilder - Madera (Guest)
10:52 AM
Jose h Wilder, Madera Coun Sheriff's /OES
Slido.corn Code# 60980 b Carr, Am
Carr, Amy
10:57 AM
Slido.com Code# 60980
c ber? b Eu ene Barrera
The Clty of Merced did a commodity flow stu ... by Wilson, Casey 488
cyber? by Eugene Barrera
Eugene Barrera
11:04AM
cyber?
The City of Merced did a commodity flow stu ... by Wilson, Casey Wilson, Casey
11:13 AM
The City of Merced did a commodity flow study a few years back. I'll track that down and send it over. • 8:teamsvisitor:651998254c5f47e9b23b06263c8e6ba8 left the meeting.
Joseph Wilder - Madera (Guest) left the meeting .
•
City of Los Banos is currently updating our ... by Stcy Souza Elms (Guest) Stcy Souza Elms (Guest)
11:16AM
City of Los Banos is currently updating our General Plan •
Program/Project environmental impact report ... by Eugene Barrera Eugene Barrera
11:17 AM
Program/Project environmental impact reports (CEQA)
• 8:teamsvisitor:8151012441414e13817470fad4b17Seb joined the meeting.
Steve M joined the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:8151012441414e13817470fad4b175eb left the meeting.
Steve M left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:3fa0cc50d5484537bbe42c94bc142cef left the meeting.
Melissa Palomino (Guest) left the meeting.
489
•
UC Merced is applying for an NSF grant for ... by Eugene Barrera Eugene Barrera
11:22 AM
UC Merced is applying for an NSF grant for planning energy resilience in the face of natural disasters . •
Each department within Merced County also j ... by Scheu rich, David@CALFIRE Scheurich, David@CALFIRE
11:22 AM Edited
Each department within Merced County also just completed a COOP /COG update •
Thanks for those comments! by Brislawn, Jeff P
Brislawn, Jeff P
11:24AM
Thanks for those comments!
•
The use of web map applications is also a g ... by Eugene Barrera Eugene Barrera
11:25 AM
The use of web map applications is also a good venue to display spatial data • any opportunities for student service-learn ... by Eugene Barrera Eugene Barrerall:28 AM
any opportunities for student service-learning with a local State University? The City of Los Banos will be starting a Mo ... by Mason Hurley (Guest) Mason Hurley (Guest)
11:29AM
490
The City of Los Banos will be starting a Monthly News Letter. We will be happy to add updates for this Plan.
• Nathan Quevedo left the meeting.
Nathan Quevedo left the meeting .
•
Thank you! by Cosentino, Helen
Cosentino, Helen
11:38 AM
Thank you!
• 8:teamsvisitor:9768014d99c04804aee0be7d08133893 left the meeting.
Stcy Souza Elms (Guest) left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:38609dc180824d59aed104d5clcbbfab left the meeting.
Jerald Meadows (Guest) left the meeting.
• 8:orgid:e473641d-7cf6-4175-9579-ab64bb4c8120 left the meeting.
Cosentino, Helen left the meeting.
• 8:orgid:9d43abf2-6db7-48dd-b48c-81a4ace7043b left the meeting.
Perez, Michael@CALFIRE left the meeting.
• 8:orgid:b9f5aceb-7d14-4499-b0d7-35411852fbel left the meeting.
Mills, Deron left the meeting.
• 8:orgid:3840cc28-241e-4f97-9558-9ddfdd224578 left the meeting.
Hicks, Nathan@DWR left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:ld16869eaeda4bala160ced98399c03b left the meeting.
Tom Ebersole (Guest) left the meeting .
•
Thank you by Mason Hurley (Guest)
Mason Hurley (Guest)
11:38 AM
Thank you
491
• 8:teamsvisitor:e5dd329ba7d84f9d8d27dbd6e0bcfab8 left the meeting. marianne Shaw left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:984926caa6ca4230882949f1295c2730 left the meeting.
Mason Hurley (Guest) left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:8885d9e89aa84357ae79bfb2e771591b left the meeting.
Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) left the meeting.
• 8:teamsvisitor:09f238a480dd468180a8bd43bacfbff2 left the meeting.
Cesar Ramirez, MCDEH (Guest) left the meeting.
• 8:orgid:de858603-eced-4bde-9c5e-ldl2clc2e417 left the meeting.
Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE left the meeting.
492
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Kickoff meeting Ill X 04:55 Request control gcft q e, •·'i [ll i [iJ - Leave · wood.
fB.CED--' · COUNTY
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Meeting #l
December 16, 2020
wood pie.com
493
494
wood.
HMPT Meeting #2 Agenda
Date: 24 March 2021
10:00 am - noon PST
Meeting at: Virtual/Webinar - Microsoft Teams (see
email/Outlook for link)
Project: Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Subject/Purpose
The purpose of the meeting is to review the highlights of the updated Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment. The meeting will be delivered as a webinar due to the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing requirements.
Attendees: Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, Stakeholders and Wood
1. Introductions
2. Review of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Process
3. Update on public involvement activities
4. Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment (HIRA) update
5. Web-map application and critical facility data
6. Capability Assessment Highlights
7. Review of mitigation goals
8. Next steps
9. Questions and answers
Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.
10940 White Rock Road, Suite 190
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
(916) 636-3200
woodplc.com
495
Meeting Summary
Total Number of Participants
Meeting Title
Meeting Start Time
Meeting End Time
Full Name
Prosperi, Juliana
Johnson, Christopher A
Brislawn, Jeff P
Carr, Amy
Parker, Derek
Scheurich, David@CALFIRE
Hicks, Nathan@DWR
41 Merced County MultiJurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update: Meeting #2 Risk
and Goals
3/24/2021, 10:47:36 AM
3/24/2021, 1:18:11 PM
Join Time
3/24/2021, 10:47:36 AM
3/24/2021, 10:47:42 AM
3/24/2021, 10:48:32 AM
3/24/2021, 10:50:57 AM
3/24/2021, 10:56:26 AM
3/24/2021, 10:56:26 AM
3/24/2021, 10:56:27 AM
Sean Runyon/Merced Co. Ag Comm. (Guest) 3/24/2021, 10:56:28 AM Barrera, Gene
Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE
Chambers, Mack
Kristi Kelechenyi
Jason Hicks
Stacy Souza Elms (Guest)
3/24/2021, 10:56:39 AM
3/24/2021, 10:57:37 AM
12095875749 3/24/2021, 10:57:41 AM
12095875749 3/24/2021, 12:32:22 PM
3/24/2021, 10:57:42 AM
3/24/2021, 10:58:14 AM
3/24/2021, 10:58:16 AM
3/24/2021, 10:58:16 AM
Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES 3/24/2021, 10:58:17 AM
Justin Lemons 3/24/2021, 10:58:59 AM
12093857564 3/24/2021, 10:59:04 AM
12093857564 3/24/2021, 11:01:16 AM
Zachery Falcon 3/24/2021, 10:59:19 AM
Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) 3/24/2021, 11:00:21 AM \Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\'"'
Kent, [email protected]
Vanessa Padilla
Kuhlemeier, Rob
Chowdhary, Pujeeta
Reith, Heather@Parks
Reith, Heather@Parks
Mitchell, Carrie
Wilson, Casey
Nishi ham a, John J
12095818675 3/24/2021, 11:00:24 AM
3/24/2021, 11:00:32 AM
3/24/2021, 11:00:33 AM
3/24/2021, 11:00:58 AM
3/24/2021, 11:01:13 AM
3/24/2021, 11:01:18 AM
12096754863 3/24/2021, 11:01:41 AM
12093835023 3/24/2021, 11:01:49 AM
12093835023 3/24/2021, 12:33:45 PM
3/24/2021, 11:01:55 AM
3/24/2021, 12:33:08 PM
12093857602 3/24/2021, 11:01:58 AM
3/24/2021, 11:02:21 AM
3/24/2021, 11:02:21 AM
3/24/2021, 11:02:21 AM
Leave Time
3/24/2021, 1:03:43 PM
3/24/2021, 1:04:57 PM
3/24/2021, 1:04:17 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:31 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:55 PM
3/24/2021, 1:04:04 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:35 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:56 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:16 PM
3/24/2021, 1:07:14 PM
3/24/2021, 11:59:49 AM
3/24/2021, 12:57:45 PM
3/24/2021, 12:58:16 PM
3/24/2021, 1:00:01 PM
3/24/2021, 12:10:01 PM
3/24/2021, 1:06:14 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:20 PM
3/24/2021, 11:49:23 AM
3/24/2021, 10:59:22 AM
3/24/2021, 12:33:55 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:54 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:21 PM
3/24/2021, 12:59:57 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:27 PM
3/24/2021, 12:37:45 PM
3/24/2021, 12:17:18 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:59 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:58 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:53 PM
3/24/2021, 12:17:32 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:31 PM
3/24/2021, 11:57:37 AM
3/24/2021, 1:03:00 PM
3/24/2021, 1:18:11 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:12 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:25 PM
3/24/2021, 11:58:58 AM
496
Mike Stephenson (Guest)
Sandra OShields (Guest)
Vicki Jones (Guest)
Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro
Sandra OShields
12098546183 3/24/2021, 11:02:24 AM
3/24/2021, 11:03:31 AM
12097262999 3/24/2021, 11:03:44 AM
3/24/2021, 11:04:47 AM
3/24/2021, 11:06:23 AM
3/24/2021, 11:31:46 AM
3/24/2021, 11:46:22 AM
12097611972 3/24/2021, 12:36:11 PM
3/24/2021, 1:02:38 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:13 PM
3/24/2021, 11:24:41 AM
3/24/2021, 11:44:22 AM
3/24/2021, 11:50:43 AM
3/24/2021, 1:02:34 PM
3/24/2021, 1:03:12 PM
3/24/2021, 12:37:26 PM
497
Duration Email Role
2h lGm [email protected] Presenter
2h 17m [email protected] Presenter
2h 15m [email protected] Organizer
2h 12m [email protected] Presenter
2h Gm [email protected] Presenter
2h 7m [email protected] Presenter
2h Gm [email protected] Presenter
2h 7m Presenter
2h Gm [email protected] Presenter
2h 9m [email protected] Presenter
lh 2m Attendee
25m 22s Attendee
2h [email protected] Presenter
2h lm [email protected] Presenter
lh llm [email protected] Presenter
2h 7m Presenter
2h Sm Presenter
S0m 23s [email protected] Presenter
18s Attendee
lh 32m Attendee
2h 3m [email protected] Presenter
2h 2m Presenter
lh 59m Attendee
2h lm Presenter
lh 37m [email protected] Presenter
lh lGm [email protected] Presenter
2h lm [email protected] Presenter
2h lm [email protected] Presenter
2h lm Attendee
lh 15m Attendee
29m 45s Attendee
SSm 41s [email protected] Presenter
29m Sls [email protected] Presenter
2h 16m Attendee
2h [email protected] Presenter
2h lm [email protected] Presenter
56m 36s [email protected] Presenter
498
2h
lh 59m
20m 56s
39m 34s
44m 20s
lh 30m
lh 16m
lm 15s
[email protected]
[email protected]
Attendee
Presenter
Attendee
Presenter
Presenter
Presenter
Presenter
Attendee
499
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
Risk Assessment and Goals Meeting Summary
March 24, 2021
10:00 AM-12 PM PST
Virtual Meeting via Microsoft Teams
Introductions and Opening Remarks
wood.
David Scheurich with County OES began the meeting with welcoming remarks, a brief overview of the requirements for hazard mitigation planning, and introduced Jeff Brislawn of Wood, the consulting firm hired to facilitate the plan development process. 41 persons were present for the virtual meeting.
Review of Mitigation, Disaster Mitigation Act (OMA) Requirements, and the Planning Process
Following introductions of the Wood team by Jeff, it was requested that all attendees type their name, title, and affiliation in the chat function of the Microsoft Teams meeting in order to capture attendance and participation (documented in Attachments 1 and 2). Jeff reviewed the planning process being followed and discussed the project status. Jeff emphasized that jurisdictions that have not yet submitted information requested in the plan update guides to do so as soon as possible. This is particularly important for new jurisdictions to the Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan as the update guides will provide a basis for the development of jurisdictional annexes.
Juliana Prosperi with the Wood team spoke on the public outreach strategy and the work thus far.
This included the creation of a public survey, with versions in English and Spanish, to gauge public input and the perception of risk for Merced County residents.
Risk Assessment Presentation and Discussion
Jeff outlined the general risk assessment requirements before beginning a detailed discussion of each hazard. He presented highlights on each hazard included in the updated risk assessment chapter of the plan, such as the number of new hazards profiled in the 2021 update which were not included in the previous plan. Refer to the Merced County HMP Risk Assessment PowerPoint presentation for specific details on each hazard and a handout summarizing hazard significance.
Additional insight and details were learned during the risk assessment conversation among participants. Highlights of the discussion are noted by hazard in the table below.
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 1 500
wood.
Hazard or Topic Meeting Discussion
Dam Incidents • A question was posed by Ruben from the City of Gustine about the lack of inundation mapping below San Luis and O'Neill Forebay dams? Mack and Jeff noted the missing data layers have been asked for but not obtained yet. David Scheurich mentioned that he had a contact who could potentially provide data. Jeff also mentioned that the Emergency Action Plans should have
inundation maps that could be referenced. David said he has a copy in his office.
Severe Weather: • No comment
Dense Fog, Extreme Temps,
Heavy Rain, Wind
Drought • No Comment
Subsidence • No Comment
Earthquake • No Comment
Flood & Levee Failure • Levee failure has been added in the flood hazard profile • No comment
Wildfire • No Comment
Landslide • No Comment
Pandemic/Epidemic • No Comment
Agriculture/Pest and Disease • No Comment
Hazardous Materials • No Comment
Cyber Attack • No Comment
Growth and Development Trends • No Comment
HIRA Summary • David Scheurich - Where does climate change fall into this as a hazard? Jeff explained that we don't typically analyze climate change as its own individual hazard, but rather look at the role climate change plays in impacting the frequency and severity of other hazards
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 2 501
wood.
Web Map Application and Critical Facility Data
Gene Barrera, the Merced County GIS manager, gave a demonstration on a new Web Map application that was being created to support the plan update process, in conjunction with a planning class that he is teaching at Stanislaus State University. The ESRI Experience Builder web application will provide more publicly accessible information related to the project, including links to the public survey, and dynamic hazard maps. A password protected map application has been developed so that each jurisdiction could review, verify, and edit critical facilities data specific to them. David and Jeff will identify potential points of contact at each jurisdiction to followup with regarding the critical facilities data review.
The link to the website is below:
https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/ c6ad8529e3a84651918e00115607206e/ The critical facilities are being grouped/classified to align with the FEMA Lifelines framework. https :ljwww.fema.gov/sites/defau lt/fi les/ 2020-05/Comm u n itylifeli nesToolkit2.0v2. pdf Review of Mitigation Goals
Another next step will be updating the plan's goals. Juliana introduced the topic of Mitigation Goals and Objectives for a Hazard Mitigation Plan. She included a summary of the goals from the previous plan, which can be kept or updated to meet the current needs of the county. The group will revisit the goals for finalization at the beginning of the next meeting.
An online form for the planning team to review and provide input to the goals update is below. http://bit.ly/3txL8LI
Input on the goals is requested by April 9th .
A worksheet will be provided after the meeting with the link, and some examples of goals from related plan for reference.
Capability Assessment Highlights
Juliana also gave an overview of the Capability Assessment portion of the plan, and noted some of the existing planning, regulatory, and project capabilities for the identified hazards. Moving forward jurisdictions should review and update capabilities to reflect current ones, and note opportunities for improvement. Worksheets have been provided in the plan update guides for this purpose.
Plan Timeline/Next steps
Jeff briefly discussed the Mitigation actions plan, highlighting the requirement that each participating jurisdiction provide will need at least one new mitigation action for the plan update, which will be discussed further at a future planning meeting.
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 3 502
wood.
The next HMPC planning meeting will be in April, with a date to be determined. The purpose of the next meeting is to update the mitigation strategy. This will include development of new mitigation actions for the plan and participating jurisdictions. Once the specific dates have been identified, a calendar update will be sent out. The meeting materials will also be shared electronically, including the presentation and handouts. The timeline and steps for the various drafts of the plan to be reviewed and approved by both Cal OES and FEMA was outlined as well.
The meeting adjourned at noon.
Attachment 1: Chat Log
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Risk Assessment Meeting Chat Log
March 24. 2021 - 10:00am-12:00pm PST
[9:47 AM] Unknown User Chowdhary, Pujeeta was invited to the meeting. [10:56 AM] Unknown User Hicks, Nathan@DWR was invited to the meeting. [10:56 AM] Unknown User Parker, Derek (External) was invited to the meeting. [10:56 AM] Unknown User Sean Runyon/Merced Co. Ag Comm. (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [10:56 AM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE was invited to the meeting. [10:56 AM] Unknown User Barrera, Gene (External) was invited to the meeting. [10:57 AM] Unknown User Chambers, Mack was invited to the meeting. [10:57 AM] Unknown User Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE was invited to the meeting. [10:58 AM] Unknown User Stacy Souza Elms (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [10:58 AM] Unknown User Kristi Kelechenyi was invited to the meeting. [10:58 AM] Unknown User Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES was invited to the meeting. [10:58 AM] Unknown User Jason Hicks (External) was invited to the meeting. [10:59 AM] Unknown User Justin Lemons was invited to the meeting. [10:59 AM] Unknown User Zachery Falcon was invited to the meeting. [11:00 AM] Unknown User Ruben and Sammy Gustine PD (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [11:00 AM] Unknown User "\"Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\"" was invited to the meeting. [11:00 AM] Unknown User Kent, [email protected] (External) was invited to the meeting. [11:00 AM] Unknown User Vanessa Padilla was invited to the meeting. [11:01 AM] Unknown User Kuhlemeier, Rob (External) was invited to the meeting. [11:01 AM] Unknown User Reith, Heather@Parks (External) was invited to the meeting. [11:02 AM] Unknown User Nishihama, John J was invited to the meeting. [11:02 AM] Unknown User Mitchell, Carrie was invited to the meeting. [11:02 AM] Unknown User Wilson, Casey (External) was invited to the meeting. [11:03 AM] Unknown User Mike Stephenson (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [11:04 AM] Unknown User Sandra OShields (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [11:06 AM] Unknown User Vicki Jones (Guest) was invited to the meeting. [11:10 AM] Barrera, Gene
Gene Barrera, Merced County GIS Manager
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 4 503
[11:10 AM] Ruben and Sammy Gustine PD (Guest}
Ruben Chavez, Chief of Police , Gustine Police Department [11:10 AM] Stacy Souza Elms (Guest}
Stacy Souza Elms, City of Los Banos - Community and Economic Development Director [11:10 AM] Hicks, Nathan@DWR (Guest}
Nathan Hicks, Engineer, DWR Flood Operations Center
[11:10 AM] Jason Hicks
Jason Hicks, Turlock Irrigation District, Manager of Security & Emergency Preparedness [11:10 AM] Kuhlemeier, Rob
Rob Kuhlemeier Merced County IT, Merced County
[11:10 AM] "\"Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\""
Alyssa Carroll Mariposa County OES
[11:10 AM] Kent, [email protected]
Walt Kent, CalOES, Emergency Services Coordinator, Region V [11:10 AM] Vicki Jones (Guest}
Vicki Jones, Merced County Environmental Health Division Director [11:10 AM] Reith, Heather@Parks
wood.
Heather Reith, Natural Resources Program Manager, California Department of Parks and Recreation [11:10 AM] Mike Stephenson (Guest}
Mike Stephenson Merced County Assistant Director Public Works [11:10 AM] Nishihama, John J (Guest)
John Nishihama Assistant CIO, Merced County
Edited
[11:10 AM] Sean Runyon/Merced Co. Ag Comm. (Guest)
Sean Runyon/ Asst. Ag Commissioner/Merced County
[11:10 AM] Carr, Amy
Amy Carr, Hazard Mitigation Planner, Wood
[11:10 AM] Johnson, Christopher A
Christopher Johnson, Hazard Mitigation Planner/GIS Analyst, Wood PLC [11:11 AM] Parker, Derek
Derek Parker, Merced Fire Department Fire Chief
[11:11 AM] Chowdhary, Pujeeta
Pujeeta Chowdhary, MPH, Risk Assessor, Wood
[11:11 AM) Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES (Guest)
Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 5 504
wood.
[11:11 AM] Wilson, Casey
Casey Wilson, City of Merced Fire, Deputy Chief
[11:11 AM] Prosperi, Juliana
Juliana Prosperi, AICP, Assistant Project Manager
[11:11 AM] Chambers, Mack
Mack Chambers, GIS Analyst, Wood
[11:12 AM] Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE (Guest)
Greg Padilla Merced County OES. David Scheurich Merced County OES. Kevin Lindo CAL FIRE-Land use planning. Gene Potkey CAL FIRE- land use planning.
[11:12 AM] Barrera, Gene
CSU Students - Please include your information as well - Thanks [11:13 AM] Sandra OShields (Guest)
Sandra OShields, Student of Barrera
[11:13 AM] Kristi Kelechenyi (Guest)
Kristi Kelechenyi, CSU Stanislaus student
[11:14 AM] Justin Lemons (Guest)
Justin Lemons Stainislause State University-Planning Issues [11:15 AM] Brislawn, Jeff P
Jeff Brislawn, Project Manager/Hazard Mitigation Lead, Wood [11:18 AM] Zachery Falcon (Guest)
Zach Falcon, CSU Student
[11:19 AM] Vanessa Padilla (Guest)
Vanessa Padilla, CSU Stanislaus Student
[11:25 AM] Mitchell, Carrie (Guest)
Carrie Mitchell/Deputy Ag Commissioner/Merced County
[11:31 AM] Unknown User Laura Rodriguez Mascorro (External) was invited to the meeting. [11:44 AM] Unknown User Sandra OShields (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [11:46 AM] Unknown User Sandra OShields was invited to the meeting. [11:50 AM] Unknown User Vicki Jones (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:07 PM] Ruben and Sammy Gustine PD (Guest)
Pat Berrellii, Fire Chief, Gustine Fire Department
[12:23 PM] Chambers, Mack
yes
[12:25 PM] Barrera, Gene
https://experience.arcgis.com/ experience/ c6ad8529e3a84651918e00115607206e/ Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 6 505
wood.
[12:37 PM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE no longer has access to the chat. [12:37 PM] Prosperi, Juliana
For those of you who joined in the last 15 minutes, if you could enter your name and the agency/organization you represent that will help us track and document participation. Thanks! [12:37 PM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE was invited to the meeting. [12:37 PM) Laura Rodriguez Mascorro
Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro, UC Merced
[12:40 PM] Reith, Heather@Parks
Hi Julianna, I entered my name earlier. I had to leave for a bit for another meeting. [12:40 PM] Prosperi, Juliana
Thanks Heather!
(1 liked)
[12:41 PM) Carr, Amy
great job Barrera, Gene and students!
[12:42 PM) Prosperi, Juliana
Amazing job Gene! And thanks to all the CSU students on the call today!! [12:52 PM] Brislawn, Jeff P
Here is the link to the goals worksheet to provide suggested revisions to the goals [12:52 PM] Brislawn, Jeff P
http://bit.ly/3txL8LI
Fill J Merced County Hazard Mitigation Goals & Objectives 2021 Update The survey will take approximately 4 minutes to complete. FEMA requires that mitigation plans establish "mitigation goals to reduce or avoid long-term vulnerabilities to the identified hazards." ... bit.ly
[12:54 PM] Ruben and Sammy Gustine PD (Guest)
Jeff, can you send the FEMA link also please?
[1:02 PM] Prosperi, Juliana
Here is the link: https:llwww.fema.gov/emergency-managers/practitioners/ lifelines (1:02 PM) Unknown User Johnny Nishihama - GCC Global Ad min (External) was invited to the meeting. [1:02 PM] Unknown User "\"Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\"" no longer has access to the chat. [1:02 PM) Unknown User Hicks, Nathan@DWR no longer has access to the chat. [1:02 PM] Kuhlemeier, Rob
Thank you for the information
[1:03 PM] Unknown User Mike Stephenson (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [1:03 PM] Unknown User Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES no longer has access to the chat. [1:03 PM] Unknown User Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [1:03 PM] Unknown User Sean Runyon/Merced Co. Ag Comm. (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. (1:04 PM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE no longer has access to the chat.
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 7 506
wood.
[1:06 PM] Unknown User Stacy Souza Elms (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [1:07 PM) Unknown User Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE no ionger has access to the chat.
Meeting ended 2h 30m 1:18 PM
lh 58m
Meeting Recorded by: Johnson, Christopher A
https:/lweb.m i crosoftstrea m.com/vi deo/2 5c20392-49c2-44d a-bld7 -4ea 50 5100984 Attachment 2: Attendance Log
Meeting Summary
Total Number of Participants 41
Meeting Title Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update: Meeting #2 Risk and Goals · Me_eting Start Time
Meeting End Time
3/i4/2021, 10:47:36 AM . .
Full Name
Prosperi, Juliana
Johnson, Christopher A
Brislawn, Jeff P
Carr.Amy
Parker, Derek
'Scheurich, David@CALFI RE
Hicks, Nathan@DWR
3/24/2021, 1:18:11 PM
Join Time
3/24/2021, 10:47:36 AM
3/24/2021, 10:47:42 AM
3/24/2021, 10:48:3_2 AM
3/24/2021, 10:50:57 AM
3/24/2~21, 10:56:26 AM
3/24/2021, 10:56:26 A_M
3/24/2021, 10:56:27 AM
Sea_n Runyc,n/Merced Co. Ag Comm. (Guest 3/24/2021, 10:56:28AM · Barrer_a, Gene 3/24/2021, 10:56:39 AM
Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE 3/24/2021, 10_:57:37 AM
Chambers, Mack
Kristi Kelechenyi
Jason Hicks
Stacy Souza Elms (Guest)
12095875749 3/24/2021, 10:57:41 AM
12095875749. 3/24/2021, 12:32:22 PM
3/24/2021, 10:57:42 AM
3/24/2021, 10:58:14 AM
3/24/2021, l~:58:16 All/I
Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES
3/24/2021, 10:58:16 AM
3/24/2021, 10:58:17 AM
Justin Lemons 3/24/2021, 10:5_8:_59 AM
1209385_756_4 3/24/2021, 10:59:04 AM
12093857564 3/24/2021, 11:01:16 AM
Zachery Falcon 3/24/2021, 10:59:19 AM
Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) 3/24/2021, 11:00:21 AM \Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\"''
Ken_t, [email protected]
Vanessa Padilla
Kuhlemeier, Rob
Chowdhary, Pujeeta
Reith, Heather@Parks
Reith, Heather@Parks
Mitchell, Carrie
Wilson, Casey
Nishihama, John J
Mike Stephenson (Guest)
Sandra OShields (Guest)
Vicki Jones (Guest)
Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro
Sandra Oshields
12095818675 • 3/24/2021, l_l:00:24 AM
3/24/2021, U:0_0:32 AM
3/24/2021, l_l:00:33 AM
3/24/2021, 11:00_:_58 A_M
3/24/2021, 11:01:13 AM
3/24/2021, 11:01:18 AM
120967548~3 3/24/2021, 11:01:41 AM
12093835023 3/24/2021, 11:01:49 AM
12093835023 3/24/2021, 12:33:~5 PM
3/24/2021, 11:01:55 AM
3/24/2021, 12:33:08 PM
12093857602 3/24/2021, 11:01:58 AM
3/24/2021, 11:02:21 AM
3/24/2021, 11:02:21 AM
3/24/2021, 1_1:02_:_21 AM
12098546183' 3/24/2021, 11:02:24 AM
3/24/2021, 11:03:31 AM
12097262999 3/24/2021, 11:03:44 AM
3/24/2021, 11:04:47 AM
3/24/2021, 11:06:23 AM
3/24/2021, 11:31:46 AM
3/24/2021, 11:46:22 AM
Leave Tim, Duration
3/2Y20212h 16m
3/24/20212h 17m
3/24/W212h 15m
3/24/20212h 12m
3/24/20212h 6m
3/24/20212h 7m
3/24/20212h Gm
3/24/2Q212_h 7m
3/24/20212h Gm
. 3i24/20_21 ii, 9,;,
3/24/202_1 lh 2m
3/24/202t25m 22s
3/24/2021 Zh
3/24/20212h lm
3/24/2021 lh llm
3/24/2021 Zh 7m
3/24/20212h Sm
3/24/2021 SOm 23s
3/24/202118s
3/2_4/2021 lh 32m
3/24/20212h 3m
3/24/2021 Zh 2m
3/24/2021 lh 59m
3/24/2021 Zh lm
3/24/2021 lh 37m
3/24/2021 lh 16m
3/24/2021 Zh lm
3/24f20212h lm
3/24/202l 2h lm
3/24/2021 lh 15m
3/24/202129m 45s
3/24/2021 SSm 41s
3/24/2021 29m Sls
. 3/24/2021 Zh 16,;,
3/24/20212h
3/24/20212h lm
3/24/2021 SGm 36s
3/24/20212h
3/24/2021 lh 59m
3/24/202120m 56s
3/24/202139m 34s
3/24/202144m 20s
3/24/20~1 lh 30m
3/24/2021 lh 16m
12097611972 3/24/2021, 12:36:11 PM 3/24/2021 lm 15s
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 8 Email
[email protected]
[email protected]_om
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
gis5@co,merced.ca._us
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Heather, [email protected] .gov
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
507
Attachment 3 Meeting Screen Capture
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 9 wood.
508
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update: Meeting #2 Risk and Goals 0 01:2947 Request control Oo O) 0 ~-.0
Growth and Development Trends
Municipalities Sphere of lnfluences
I :5{'1 • • · "' , 1 ,y ,, . 1 • Countywide pop. projected to • i ·· , increase by 82% by 2040 ~
- .. °" ... I J
·--. ,:_: '\. _._ -r .
',"if i;...: ,., - . .. ·'r:. 1'- .. ~ - . -,
\ '--.,..
~
'
+25
~
-
' J~•
- ~~ ........ ~~---..tU - O-P•<>1
..,.,,,,.~ o ......
~• • i.Ml'IQ&tlm
.,,,-111:.--.,. lb1Blf'ltl1 ,~,--- _ ..._" _ ..,.,.. ... ~ f'..t.~ - ~ Nalcm-'Wlti:Jl'ftiR•fvQf"
GrwH!a~J'Mldl-
"'-n,;-.it1Ar•1
·,
A
283,521 - 2020
346,085 - 2040 (CA DOF)
• Highlights from Plan Update
Guides:
City of Merced 6111 fastest growing city in
CA (as of Jan. 2020)
Annexation of UC Merced approved
February 2021,
City of Dos Palos received grant
approval for construction of new
Water Treatment facility.
Sphere of Influence Parcel Analysis:
Estimated 6,917 buildings within Dam
lnundation areas
Estimated 3,066 buildings within 1%
Annual Chance Flood
Estimated 1,514 buildings within Fire
Threat areas
wood.
• A l ~ ""
~ I I
Scheurich, David@CA... ':;~ Brislawn, Jeff P - Carr, /\my 't 0 X
[] ~ IT] "Leave
Participants X
Type a name
c<: Share invite
• In this meeting (30) Mute all
~ Prosperi, Juliana ~ I
£ +12095818675
• :.) ~
£ . +12093857564
• :.) ~
£ +12096754863
• :.) ~
£ +12093857602
• :.) ~
£ . + 12098546183 •
• W')
e "\"Alyssa Carroll (Guest)\"" ~
509
510
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Importance:
Brislawn, Jeff P
Thursday, April 08, 202111:46 AM
Scheurich, David@CALFIRE; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Barrera, Gene; Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE
Merced Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update - Critical Facility Data review and input
High
In follow up to the meeting on the Hazard Mitigation Plan on March 24th in regards to the critical facility data, we would like each jurisdiction's assistance validating the GIS data that has been collected. We are reaching out to you as points of contact for your jurisdiction. There are two primary aspects of the review of critical facilities:
1. Data completeness/correctness-we want to ensure we have the facilities and assets captured, and in the correct geographic location
2. Alignment/classification with FEMA Lifelines framework In the long term there are other data attributes that this site will allow for update and maintenance, including facility valuations, contact info, etc.
Please go the on line map application
https://experience.arcgis.com /experience/ c6ad8529e3a84651918e00115607206e/ to browse the data for your jurisdiction and verify the information. You can access the map application using the Link to Maintenance Editor button on the following page;
https: //experience.arcgis.com/ experience / c6ad8529e3a84651918e00115607206e/page/page 16/ M-._rt9'fJ c o-...ir,tv M1.ri~ J1r11u:hd•~• lt--< .1 t1..,.u,in! M11K,;4.rllP<• Pi.in W1t-r1r. fo't'let:, P.ir"\-fY..11,,. f1 P'u~IA! . -
THE LOG IN USER NAME AND PASSWORD TO ACCES THE EDITOR APPLICATION IS:
511
User Name: hmp_user
Password: mchmp2021@mercedcounty
Following your review, please send an email to Gene Barrera ([email protected]) to let him know the following, as applicable:
I have reviewed and it looks complete.
I have reviewed and made edits to address completed/accuracy.
I have reviewed but need assistance making changes.
As a reminder, we are using the FEMA lifelines framework as the basis for defining critical facilities for the plan update:
Community lifelines are fundamental services in a County that provide day-to-day support for a community's basic needs and when stable allow the community to function.
FEMA further defines lifelines into 7 categories: safety and security (fire, police); food, water, and shelter (cooling center); health and medical; energy; communications; transportation; and hazardous materials (Hazmat facil ities, pollutant controls).
@®@®@®@
8 ~ T <11.> /!\ .. i ..... wa ·- .,_ ,._ ..,..,.__
& - •
A
, .
More details on FEMA lifelines can be referenced here:
https://www.fema. gov/ sites/ default/ ti les/ 2020-05/ Com m unitylife Ii nesTool kit2.0v2. pdf We'd like to get the Critical Facility information updated in the GIS Experience Application by Wednesday April 21st. Gene Barrera with Merced County is avai lable to provide additional assistance. On the splash page 512
of the editor application is a link to a video excerpt of his demo of the application on March 24th :
In addition, we will schedule another online-workshop to answer questions on this. This will be scheduled for Thursday April 15th at 9-l0am. An Outlook invite will be sent for this.
Please let us know if you will be delegating this to someone else in your jurisdiction.
Thanks
Jeff
Jeff Brislawn
Hazard Mitigation Lead/Sr Associate
Hazard Mitigation and Emergency Management Program
Office: 303-742-5315 Mobile: 303-704-5506
www .woodplc.com
wood.
513
Merced HMP -workshop with emergency managers for each jurisdiction to discuss critical Facility data collection. Webinar on 4/15/21.
Gene Baraa
Attended by 19 persons.
Chat log is below.
Dan Arnold Public Works Director, City of G ... by Dan Arnold (Guest) Dan Arnold (Guest)
10:03 AM
Dan Arnold Public Works Director, Cit of Gustine, CA.
Mason Hurley, Fire Chief - City of Los Bano by Mason Hurley (Guest) Mason Hurley (Guest)
10:03 AM
Mason Hurle , Fire Chief - Ci of Los Banos
514
Rich McEachin Dos Palos PD Chief by Rich McEachin (Guest) Rich McEachin (Guest)
10:03 AM
Rich McEachin Dos Palos PD Chief
• Jeff Brislawn, Pro·ect Mana er, Wood b Brislawn, Jeff P Brislawn, Jeff P
10:03 AM
Jeff Brislawn, Pro·ect Mana er, Wood
Nicole Desmond, Management Analyst Ill, Mer ... by Desmond, Nicole M Desmond, Nicole M
10:03 AM
Nicole Desmond, Mana ement Anal st Ill, Merced Count Executive Office Derek Parker Merced Fire Department Fire Ch ... by Parker, Derek Parker, Derek (External)
10:03 AM
Derek Parker Merced Fire De artment Fire Chief\
Ruben Chavez, Gustine Chief of Police by "Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest)" "Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest)"
10:03 AM
515
Ruben Chavez, Gustine Chief of Police
Corina Falaschi Gustine Planning by Corina Falaschi (Guest) Corina Falaschi (Guest}
10:04 AM
Corina Falaschi Gustine Plannin
Sgt. Cliff Battles, Dos Palos Police Depart... by Guest Guest
10:04 AM
S t. Cliff Battles, Dos Palos Police De artment
Alex Harrington FAE Merced County Fire Dept... by Harrington- Gustine Fire Station (Guest) Harrington- Gustine Fire Station (Guest}
10:04 AM
Alex Harrin ton FAE Merced Count Fire De t, Gustine Station • 8:teamsvisitor:9552c6bf2cf947e6871402e542f6cf43 was invited to the meetin .
Corina Falaschi was invited to the meetin .
• 8:teamsvisitor:914be04aa9514a838a43ce3d98f83d4d was invited to the meetin .
Robert A uso (Guest) was invited to the meetin .
• 8:tea msvisitor:21 a fefc07 8c 14d 5894 78827 5 5 32ffd 3 5 I eft the chat.
Robert A uso left the chat.
516
Robert Ayuso Atwater City Fire Battalion Ch ... by Robert Ayuso (Guest) Robert Ayuso (Guest)
10:10AM
Robert A uso Atwater Cit Fire Battalion Chief
Here is a link to the FEMA Lifeline Toolkit... by Chambers, Mack Chambers, Mack
10:13 AM
Here is a link to the FEMA Lifeline Toolkit, if you go to page 12 in the PDF you will see a summary of all the categories. Pages after break down each Lifeline into Components or Subcomponents to better identify where facilities will fit.
htt s:/ www.ferna.oov/sites default/files/2020-05 Cormnunit ·Lifelinesioolkit2 0v2 pelf • 8:or id:Sf1f768a-ed5a-43f1 -ba4f-001 dad3eabb1 was invited to the meetin .
Scheurich, David@CALFIRE was invited to the meetin .
You are filtered and can't see the points by Parker, Derek Parker, Derek (External)
10:21 AM
You are filtered and can't see the points
• 8:or id:Sf1f768a-ed5a-43f1 -ba4f-001 dad3eabb1 left the chat.
Scheurich, David@CALFIRE left the chat.
517
• 8:teamsvisitor:914be04aa9514a838a43ce3d98f83d4d left the chat.
Robert A uso (Guest) left the chat.
• 8:teamsvisitor:0fde14b7e014471db189b91c410bf54c left the chat.
Harrin ton- Gustine Fire Station (Guest) left the chat. • 8:teamsvisitor:cffa 1285721 c48daa4b 7e51 a68f8fd 16 left the chat.
Corina Falaschi (Guest} left the chat.
• 8:teamsvisitor:9552c6bf2cf947e6871402e542f6cf43 left the chat.
Corina Fa lase hi left the chat.
• 8 :tea msvi si tor:ef59c5c819d b48bd85 851Sa76d f2305 7 left the chat.
Rich McEachin (Guest) left the chat.
• 8:teamsvisitor:ee4be146434a400699bd98020421049b left the chat Mason Hurle {Guest} left the chat.
• 8:teamsvisitor:fc80128326804a079f0af6cec2aac350 left the chat. "Ruben and Samm Gusitine PD (Guest)" left the chat.
• 8:or id·de8S8603-eced-4bde-9c5e-1d12c1c2e4171eftthe chat.
Padilla, Gre o @CALFIRE left the chat.
• 8:teamsvisitor:b4500b4ab8ad42aaa87728fd2e01 e4ef left the chat.
Cliff Battles (Guest} left the chat.
518
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
Meeting # 3: Mitigation Strategy Meeting Agenda
Date: Thursday, May 13, 2021
10:00 am - noon
Meeting at: Virtual/Webinar - Microsoft Teams (see
email/Outlook for link)
Subject/Purpose
This meeting will focus on updating the plan's mitigation strategy, including updating the plan's goals and objectives, actions undertaken since the last plan update, and identifying new mitigation activities. All participating jurisdictions and planning team members are encouraged to attend and provide input and ideas on new mitigation actions. The meeting will be delivered as a virtual meeting due to the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing requirements.
Attendees: Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, Stakeholders and Consultant Team ~-------------
1. Introductions
2. Review of the Planning Process and Progress to Date
3. Update of Mitigation Goals
4. Review of progress on Mitigation Actions from 2015 Plan
5. Review of Mitigation Action Categories and Alternatives
6. Development of New Mitigation Actions
7. Next steps
8. Questions and Answers
wood.
519
wood.
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update Mitigation Strategy Webinar
May 13, 2021, 10:00 AM-12:00 PM
Introductions and Opening Remarks
Jeff Brislawn, Project Manager with Wood Environment and Infrastructure Solutions (Wood), kicked off the webinar and thanked everyone for their participation. Jeff introduced the Wood team and led a roll call of attendees to introduce themselves. In total 34 individuals participated in the webinar representing Merced County and participating jurisdictions, including municipalities and special districts, as well as stakeholders and partner organizations.
Review of the Planning Process and Progress to Date
The FEMA planning process steps were recapped; Wood is currently wrapping up the Risk Assessment process and beginning the mitigation strategy portion. This webinar addressed mitigation strategizing and goal review/development aspects.
The roles of the participating jurisdictions in the HMPC vs. Stakeholders were reviewed, as differentiated under FEMA's eyes. Only the participating jurisdictions, will be specifically addressed in the plan and will be required to meet certain criteria such as attending planning meetings, identifying mitigation actions, and tracking other aspects in order to qualify for funding in the future. While other entities (i.e. everyone else) were key stakeholders that would provide useful input and feedback as well as review the Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) drafts.
The progress on the plan update process to date was reviewed. Highlights include:
• Kickoff meeting held December 16th
• Risk Assessment meeting held March 24th
• First public meeting held May 12th
• Online Public Survey closed May 31 st
• HIRA Update Ongoing
• New project website and web map interface created for the project Update on Public Involvement Activities/public meeting.
Jeff noted that the online public survey is closed on May 3l51 and received 264 responses. The top five hazards of concern based on this public survey were:
• Drought
• Extreme Temperatures
• Pandemic/Epidemic
• Wildfire
• Wind
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 520
wood.
Mitigation Goals and Objectives
The goals from the 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan were revisited, as were the goals from the 2015 City of Merced HMP. Key differences between "goals," "objectives" and "actions" were defined: goals and objectives are usually more general and broad guidelines while actions are specific and project-driven.
Projects submitted for grant funding will need to tie back to goals and objectives in the HMP. The suggested 2021 Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan goals and objectives were created based on a hybrid of the previous Merced County and City of Merced goals. They are as follows:
Goals:
Goal 1: Reduce the potential for loss of life and injury from hazards Goal 2: Minimize or reduce damage to property.
Goal 3: Build resiliency and redundancy to maintain essential services, lifelines, facilities, and infrastructure.
Goal 4: Minimize impacts of hazards to agriculture and the economies of communities.
Goal 5: Protect and leverage natural and beneficial mitigation functions of the environment.
Goal 6: Promote hazard mitigation as an integrated policy.
Goal 7: Increase public awareness of hazards.
For each of the goals and objectives, Jeff highlighted the proposed changes and additions and led a discussion with the committee members.
Review of Progress on Existing Mitigation Actions
Prior to the webinar, a Mitigation Action Tracker was sent to the HMPC listing each jurisdictions' 2014 mitigation actions. Each HMPC representative was asked to provide status and comments on the status of each action. The Tracker was emailed again following the webinar to fill in some of the missing statuses, as some jurisdictions had not yet returned the Tracker at the time of the webinar. The mitigation action statuses are categorized as one of the following: Completed, Annual Implementation, In Progress, Not Started, and Deleted.
Some examples of "Deleted" actions may be due to lack of project applicability over time, or even inability to complete a project in an area where the community does not have control/jurisdiction (e.g. state owned vs. federal land). Annual Implementation are actions that a jurisdiction is conducting on an ongoing basis, but which the jurisdiction wants to continue forward into the updated plan to maintain visibility on the action.
Mitigation Actions
Jeff lead a discussion on the Mitigation Actions portion of the plan. One way to think of mitigation actions is the four A's:
• Altering a hazard,
• Averting a hazard,
• Avoiding a hazard,
• Adapting to a hazard
FEMA suggests these four categories for mitigation actions:
• Plans and Regulations,
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 2 521
wood.
• Structure and Infrastructure Projects,
• Education and Awareness, and
• Natural Systems Protection.
Resources for more details on mitigation action types, categories, and example projects were provided, including a short discussion on climate change and adaptation considerations. Example hazard -specific mitigation projects were discussed including FEMA funding-eligible projects for winter weather, flood, and other hazards.
Developing New Mitigation Actions
Each participating jurisdiction is required to develop at least one new action for the 2021 plan update.
Ideally, jurisdictions should develop actions that address all the hazards addressed in the plan, or at least the High significance hazards. All jurisdictions that participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) will need to have a mitigation action addressing continued NFIP compliance.
The following are resources with ideas and examples of mitigation actions and implementation:
• FEMA's 'Mitigation Action Portfolio' Publication: https:llwww.fema.gov/ sites/ default/files/ 2020- 08/fema mitigation-action-portfolio-support-document 08-01-2020 0.pdf • DOLA 'Planning for Hazard' Guide: https://planningforhazards.com/home A link to the New Mitigation Action Survey was shared during the meeting and emailed after. Each HMPC member was asked to fill out the survey with at least one mitigation action by June 3rd.
New Mitigation Actions Survey: http://bit.ly/MercedActions Next Steps
The project schedule was reviewed:
Project Milestone
• HMPT Meeting #4
• HMPT Review Draft
• Public Review Draft
• Cal OES Review
• FEMA Review (estimated)
Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 11 :30 am
Anticipated Timeline
June 2021
Late June 2021
August 2021
September 2021
November-December 2021
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 3 522
wood.
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Mitigation Strategy Meeting Chat Log
May 13, 2021 -10:00am-12:00pm PST
Times below are reflected in Mountain Time.
Meeting started 10:46 AM
Michael Salvador (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Buck (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat
Mills, Deron (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Parker, Derek (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Mike North (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Cliff Battles (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Wilson, Casey (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Calvin Curtin (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Gurrola, Joanne@CalOES (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Jones, Vicki (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Robert Ayuso (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Runyon, Sean (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Bill Gibbs - MCFB (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Jason Hicks (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Cosentino-Massimino, Helen (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Janell Martin (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Kuhlemeier, Rob (External) has temporarily joined the chat.
Alyssa Carroll (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat.
Wes Smith@mariposacountyOES (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. (11:01 AM] Unknown User mabeloe (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :02 AM] Unknown User Kent, [email protected] (External) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :02 AM] Unknown User Christina Thurman (External) has temporarily joined the chat. [11:03 AM] Unknown User Stacy Souza Elms, City of Los Banos (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :03 AM] Unknown User Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro (External) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :03 AM] Unknown User Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :04 AM] Unknown User Barrera, Gene (External) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :07 AM] Unknown User Jerald Meadows (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. (11 :13 AM] Barrera, Gene
Gene Barrera, GIS Manager Merced County
(11 :13 AM] Jason Hicks
Jason Hicks, Security/Emergency Preparedness Manager, Turlock Irrigation District (11 :13 AM] Bill Gibbs - MCFB (Guest)
Bill Gibbs, Executive Director, Merced County Food Bank (11 :13 AM] Jones, Vicki
Vicki Jones, Environmental Health Division Director, Merced County (11 :13 AM] Jerald Meadows (Guest)
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 4 523
Jerald Meadows - Meteorologist in Charge - National Weather Service [11 :13 AM] Cosentino-Massimino, Helen (Guest)
Helen Cosentino-Massimino, American Red Cross, Disaster Program Manager [11 :13 AM] Stacy Souza Elms, City of Los Banos (Guest) Stacy Souza Elms, City of Los Banos Community and Economic Development Director [11 :13 AM] Kuhlemeier, Rob
Robert Kuhlemeier, Merced County IT supervisor
[11 :13 AM] Kent, [email protected]
Walt Kent, Emergency Services Coordinator, CalOES
[11 :13 AM] Wes Smith@mariposacountyOES (Guest)
Wes Smith - Mariposa County OES
[11 :13 AM] Michael Salvador
Michael Salvador Chief of Police Cituof Atwtaer
(11 :13 AM] Janell Martin
Janell Martin, Executive to the City Manager, City of Atwater [11 :13 AM] Mills, Deron (Guest)
Deron Mills, PG&E Public Safety Specialist
[11 :13 AM] Runyon, Sean
Sean Runyon, Assistant Agricultural Commissioner, Merced County [11 :13 AM] Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro
Laura Rodriguez-Mascorro, Emergency Manager, UC Merced
[11 :14 AM] Carr, Amy
Amy Carr, Hazard Mitigation Planner, Wood
[11:14 AM] Mike North (Guest)
Mike North, Merced County Public Information Officer
(11 :14 AM] Brislawn, Jeff P
Jeff Brislawn, Hazard Mitigation Lead, Wood
[11 :14 AM] Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE (Guest)
Greg Padilla Assistant Director of Administration for Merced County OES. [11 :14 AM] Cliff Battles (Guest)
Cliff Battles, Acting Chief of Police - Dos Palos
[11:14 AM] Ruben and Sammy Gusitine PD (Guest)
Ruben Chavez, Gustine Chief of Police, Emergency Services Coordinator Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 wood.
5 524
wood.
[11:14AM] mabeloe (Guest)
Martha Abeloe, Administrative Analyst PW, Adabel Pirita, Administrative Analyst PW, Tony Avina Public Works Superintendent City of Livingston
[11 :15 AM] Calvin Curtin
Calvin Curtin, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Turlock Irrigation District [11 :15 AM] Unknown User Justin Vinson (External) has temporarily joined the chat. [11 :17 AM] Gurrola, Joanne@CalOES
Joanne Gurrola, Emergency Services Coordinator, CalOES
[11 :18 AM] Robert Ayuso (Guest)
Robert Ayuso CAL FIRE/Atwater City Fire Battalion Chief [11 :18 AM] Unknown User Stephenson, Michael J (External) has temporarily joined the chat. [11:21 AM] Barrera, Gene
https://experience.arcgis.com/ experience/ c6ad8529e3a84651918e00115607206e/paqe/page 12/?draft-true [11 :28 AM] Wilson, Casey
Casey Wilson, Deputy Chief, City of Merced Fire
[11 :28 AM] Parker, Derek
Derek Parker, Fire Chief, Merced Fire
[11:29 AM] Prosperi, Juliana
If anyone has any suggestions on the blended/hybrid goals, you can provide edits in the Meeting Chat here! [11 :30 AM] Barrera, Gene
Maintain a comprehensive database of hazards locations, data, infrastructure, and critical facilities inventories. [11 :32 AM] Michael Salvador
need to treat the public safety power shutoff as a future hazard that needs mitigation. in goal one. [11:37 AM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. [11:38 AM] Prosperi, Juliana
Juliana Prosperi, Wood E&IS, Assistant Project Manager
[11 :42 AM] Carr, Amy
Slido.com
[11:43 AM] Carr, Amy
code#680239
[11:54 AM] Unknown User Hicks, Nathan@DWR (Guest) has temporarily joined the chat. [12:07 PM] Carr, Amy
http://bit.ly/MercedActions
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 6 525
wood.
[12:12 PM] Carr, Amy
FEMA Mitigation Action Portfolio: httos://www.fema.gov/ sites/default/files/ 2020-08/ fema mitigation-action-portfoliosupport-document 08-01-2020 0.pdf [12:12 PM] Carr, Amy
CalOES California Adaptation Planning Guide https://www.caloes.ca.gov/ HazardMitigationSite/ Documents/ CAAdaptation-Planning-Guide-FINAL-June-2020-Accessible.odf [12:18 PM] Michael Salvador
general and specific to the City of Atwater
[12:18 PM] Unknown UserKent, [email protected] (External) left the chat. [12:1 9 PM] Cliff Battles (Guest)
Drought management and water infrastructure specific to Dos Palos [12:27 PM] Cliff Battles (Guest)
unfortunately I had an incident arise and have to step out. Thank you for the information and I will contact you via email if I have any further questions
[12:34 PM] Janell Martin
Thank you for your time!
[12:34 PM] Robert Ayuso (Guest)
Thanks Jeff!
[12:34 PM] Jason Hicks
Thank you.
[12:34 PM] Parker, Derek
Thank you!
[12:34 PM] Unknown User Alyssa Carroll (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:34 PM] Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE (Guest)
Thank you Jeff and Juliana!
[12:34 PM] Unknown User Jerald Meadows (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:34 PM] Barrera, Gene
Thanks Jeff and Juliana!
[12:34 PM] mabeloe (Guest)
Thank you for your presentation!
[12:34 PM) Michael Salvador
thank you.
[12:34 PM] Unknown User Robert Ayuso (Guest) no longer has access to the chat.
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 7 526
wood.
[12:34 PM) Unknown User Wes Smith@mariposacountyOES (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM) Unknown User Stacy Souza Elms, City of Los Banos (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM] Unknown User Mills, Deron (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM] Unknown User Buck (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM] Prosperi, Juliana
Thanks Everyone for participating today.
[12:35 PM) Unknown User Padilla, Gregory@CALFIRE (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM] Unknown User Scheurich, David@CALFIRE (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:35 PM] Unknown User Mike North (Guest) no longer has access to the chat. [12:57 PM] Unknown User Bill Gibbs - MCFB (Guest) no longer has access to the chat.
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2021 8 527
Me,ced HMPI meeting# 3 Mitigation Strategy □ X
0 01:15:04 Request control 83 0 e...;, ~ ~ [I] n wvl!
Disaster Mitigation Act Requirements
► Each jurisdiction must have at least one new action
► "A comprehensive range'; of activities and hazards
► Priority should be given to High Risk hazards
► Must be "true" 111itigation to meet FEMA requirements ► Preparedness & other actions may also be included
► Actions must be prioritized
► Actions must have detail on implementation & administration ► Actions must have a basic review of benefit vs cost
► Must include actions that address existing and future development Merced County HMP Update - Meeting -#3 Mitigation Strategy Meeting wood. 528
0 012003
M,,iced HMPl meeting# 3 M,tigatior, Strategy
New Mitigation Action Development
► Please submit new mitigation actions by
June 3rd
► Use New Mitigation Action
Worksheet (Word doc) attached to
Outlook Calendar invite.
► Alternately use online form:
► http://bit.ly/MercedActions
► Include as much detail as you can,
collaboration with others is within and
outside of jurisdiction encouraged.
Feel free to submit more than one.
Merced County HMP Update - Meeting ~3 Mitigation Strategy Meeting Request control Oo c:)) 0
Merced County Multi-Jurisdictional Mazard Mitigation Plan New Mitigation Action Wortc&heet
Nomeot.Juritd-.1'0ft:
U1t: tba-.;) tt'l'.OCd pc'k<o~ m,upatKin p,:i,ccu (1 pa.ee pc:r p-o,ect'¥t100) 1dcil.bfi.cd di.Rina tbe p1.wluJ8' pr«m to llk:ludi: 11' lh<' ¢t~ pla. Pto\,de .a, mlldl del.W as pl)l'Slblt .and u~ add.ill.~ ~leii .Uc.tt.et-sat}', C001plete .amd fctl.ut !O . .\my Can ~ i:-mgwoodp!CC•"!! ~' Jent Y'.lO?I
Ju111<hct1on;
MlliQ,ationProj«tlttle:
Pl1omy !High. M-!diurn. , ....
IIWl()&1tMPJ()f«:I:
Dn<rip6orl
ldNtlOI
1mpl.,,.,.n1111bon 1no
Ul',Onci 6dd1es.Yd hf
•PJ?IIClhlel!
HMpontll>leotttu:
~:--~--
PO(tntl!ll ~una1no:
_.,._ Cottfttltl\!lte:
·-· TflW!ilMI
~-~-.. =::::::::::::::::::~
□
e.,0 ~ ~ [I] - leave
' --i
I
wood.
529
Merced County
Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
Meeting # 4: Mitigation Strategy Refinement
Meeting Agenda
Date: Tuesday June 29, 2021
9:00 am - noon
Meeting at: County EOC 3500 North Apron Ave.
Atwater CA 95301
Subject/Purpose
This meeting will focus on refining and prioritizing new mitigation activities, discussing the draft Hazard Mitigation Plan and final gaps, and plan implementation and maintenance procedures.
All participating jurisdictions and planning team members are encouraged to attend and provide input. The meeting will be delivered as an in-person workshop, with a remote option available.
Attendees: Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, Stakeholders and Consultant Team
1. Introductions
2. Review of the Planning Process and Progress to Date
3. Revised Mitigation Goals
4. Review of Updated Mitigation Action Strategy and New Mitigation Actions
5. Prioritization of New Mitigation Actions
6. Draft Plan Overview
7. Plan implementation and maintenance
8. Next steps
wood.
530
SIGN-IN SHEET
MERCED COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE HMPT Meeting #4: Mitigation Strategy Refinement
Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:00 AM - Noon
County EOC 3500 North Apron Ave. Atwater, CA 95301
Name Title Phone E-mail
€.5c wi1
i:;-uP-11 ~ --· , ..-;::)p
N T(i.,., ·" · n rU- /orcr;. I A e f'J1,._f'
. &\v. ½-\-rk I U\✓, \\\ ,...(2~-ifl) 3~\ -\ O& 1 I \/\·c~·. ·\0'1'.lt.eflfJctru.~J?metr.rJ .cb 1 C/4 Zt>9 .. 3 '5"7 ... ~z ?- - --
I ._ .. ) r/ 0 J · .... , I ~ · •" · ... , -R :St - 1 1 I ~- . . I s6l/--'7 ~;tJ 1~ l\ U ..... "\9 w., ·, ,> l ,)\f"1 '.i\ C-: f'eto '' l\ ~\ \ I L . --s·. :s ' L . D ,
Jo 11!) 5{Jf} 1 ·feJ {'rr!s!; 'q I h-
.r)
itif)EX.-C A"'\ v.S CAt- ,:,~e /kS_"iJAitett. c,-c SA't1' Al. ,o~ CH,~ rtr t--\ )f--)
~hr.sf () r~
Z:>1- 3 B7- 454;; I \ s ~,JJ G? el, t-e. v\ e+-
tJ t (}- I, ~fr9 IS8 //f!,/Jt. ; ,,ih n-;an iJ. !Pd trtJ:. ~Drt J (,
-z.o, ~ '1(, l .. <,s t.o I ,-<o.«0t-r. A'tvJc> ~ F'ltCE'.C..,q . l:,ov -207--'3Bl.- l\1'5
. o.
/
~,
6:,,) ~"'..> C C //"l.,,C;. Ch E ✓ I t,,u '1 Slf 7-, ~ ~/ (?b-J.~J"1 531
SIGN-IN SHEET
MERCED COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE HMPT Meeting #4: Mitigation Strategy Refinement
Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:00 AM - Noon
County EOC 3500 North Apron Ave. Atwater, CA 95301
Name Title Phone I E-mail
A-741 2
1 '3L1 I )(A"/. t7~J (P Cr:>J,'I +-, "-"\ -l o?tVLea::.ecJ COr'l-'l ~~
·,-e,,:,1J-r-i , ,.-,,.,111,,,..,,-l•, -- , uc. ~
532
2021 M erced County Goals and Objectives
Goal 1: Reduce the potential for loss of life and injury from hazards - Assist vulnerable populations from the impacts of severe weather by organizing a mechanism for outreach
- Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks
- Identify opportunities to reduce losses associated with High Hazard potential dams
Goal 2: Minimize or reduce damage to property.
- Minimize growth and development in hazard areas
- Adopt and enforce building codes
- Educate property owners by increasing wildfire awareness and measures for reducing risks
- Identify opportunities to reduce losses associated with High Hazard potential dams
Goal 3: Build resiliency and redundancy to maintain essential services, lifelines, facilities, and infrastructure.
- Ensure protection and enhancement of key emergency access routes - Protect critical facilities and infrastructure to minimize loss of critical services - Seek funding sources and partners for future mitigation activities - Improve organizational capabilities to address health and safety issues in mitigation and response
533
Goal 4: Minimize impacts of hazards to agriculture and the economies of communities.
- Encourage water conservation measures among urban, rural, and agricultural users
- Increase water storage to mitigate flooding and drought - Strengthen disaster resistance and resiliency of major employers - Develop plans for post-disaster recovery
Goal 5: Protect and leverage natural and beneficial mitigation functions of the environment.
- Encourage the use of drought tolerant or xeriscaping practices into landscape ordinances
- Incorporate defensible space in landscaping of new and existing development Goal 6: Promote hazard mitigation as an integrated policy. - Promote hazard mitigation as integrated policy among communities in the county and with the region and state
- Incorporate flood mitigation into local planning by adoption of post disaster recovery ordinance based on a plan to regulate repair activity - Continue to improve enforcement of existing standards and regulations Goal 7: Increase public awareness of hazards.
- Promote education and awareness about natural hazards risk, mitigation, and preparedness to citizens, public agencies, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, and businesses
- Develop water saving education program
- Increase communication regarding hazard mitigation among communities in the county
534
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey 2021
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey
Question 3: Do you have information on specific hazard issues/problem areas that you would like the planning committee to consider? Note the jurisdiction to which it applies:
• Wildfires
• Wind, lack of water for agriculture, fire.
• Fireplace smoke
• Wildfires west of gustine
• Wildfires.
• Fires
• Fires, Traffic accidents, power outages Merced county west side • Methane gas
• Pesticides
• Water quality and over pumping of our water supply
• Natural fires and landslides on Pacheco Pass. Also, high winds and dense fog • Flooding of Bear Creek in the southeast corner of Merced. • Power outages and flooding
• Climate Change ... cyberhacked institutionally ... drought • Merced/Stanislaus Counties all of the back roads need to be repaved, please. I travel them frequently between Gustine and Modesto. Thanks for asking. • Covid-19 response
• Fires and earthquakes
• Covid-19
• Drought
• Pandemic, Fires, Wind, Flood
• Droughts. Build more dams.
• Not in my recollection about the disruption of my daily life. • Smoke from Wildfires
• Fahrens park in merced overflowed with water 2 years ago. • SG/ cell towers in a close radius to homes and schools. This is major issue im concerned with. • Fires and smoke inhalation in Merced County
• Bad air quality due to wildfires around us along with extreme temperatures. • All natural factors that could affect power/internet outage should be reduced significantly. • More planning for evacuation locations.
• Public Safety Power Shut offs (Atwater PD)
• Merced county - Gustine: high winds, constant city water issues, • More Financial assistance/ Homelessness/ Health Insurance/ More Low income housing if pandemic hits USA again.
• bridges and roads
• Drinking water quality - Los Banos area
• Los Banos - Subsidence
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
2021 Reference Material
1 535
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey 2021
• Flooding in the Los Banos area. It's closeness to the dam puts it in danger. All earthen dams fail, eventually, and San Luis is no different. Heavy rain affects our roads and the number of escape routes is limited.
• The largest hazard is lack of affordable housing for our friends and neighbors that rely on rentals • If you don't fix the water storage (Dams) problem none of the other issues will matter. Try imagining life in the arid areas of Nevada, because that's what it will look like here. End of problems.
• Merced County was underprepared for pandemic response. Pandemics will increase with climate change, so climate change and pandemic preparedness should be of utmost importance for future planning. (Merced City and Merced County).
• Overpopulation of pigeons, seagulls, and crows.
• Flooding on City streets
• Fire in Del Puerto Canyon
• Fire
• Big rigs driving to fast on south ave /140/33 Gustine ca. its a hazard to the residents and our property. Day and night.
• Power outage and pandemic
• Bridges and roads washing out during heavy rains.
• Excessive heat and water shortage is most concerning
• Wildfires and strong wind
• Environment: Pollution/Littering
• Drought
• Homeless people with mental health problems and/or drug addiction in the downtown Merced area.
• Wind damaging roofs, earthquake mitigation in structures for future cases, covid, chemical sprays near homes next to orchards.
• I live in a nicer part of Merced so I am not too worried about most of these issues. I would be worried about fine since these houses would burn down pretty fast. • Power outages
• There were the wildfires which meant that school was cancelled and going outside was not a good idea.
• It was in stanislaus County with the fires that made it difficult to see and breath • High winds through the area. Hazmat being moved through the area on Hwy 33. Nearby airport with cropdusters - possibility of crash and hazmat leak. Dos Palos • Bear creek/black raschal creek, cottonwood creek flooding. Merced • I do not feel qualified to answer.
• Diseases delivered via mosquito bite, wetlands in Los Banos is cause for this concern. Also a blended concern of Agriculture impact on air quality when combined with Strong Winds, this includes but is not limited to pesticides and dirt becoming airborne due to agricultural land uses. • Atwater has had many power outages
• It's mostly power outages (which is to blame PG&E for not taking the time for better infrastructure), wildfires have threatened us, and small earthquakes have happened. I live in Atwater
• Emergency plans for natural disasters and diseases.
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
2021 Reference Material
2 536
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey 2021
• Protection from cyber attacks
• Poor air quality, pesticide use in agricultural areas/unsustainable farming practices, natural disaster preparedness in unincorporated jurisdictions throughout Merced County, specifically Winton.
• Road conditions in Merced County
• Merced, COVID.
• Flooding
• Wildfires
• Envien mas informaci6n a la poblaci6n de Cuando hay peligros inminentes para siempre estar preparados. Y mas talleres para Saber c6mo actuar en caso de Emergencias.
Translation: Send more information to the populations of when there are imminent dangers and how to always be prepared. And more workshops for how to act in case of an emergency
• Vientos fuertes; arboles de ramas quebradizas
o Translation: Strong winds; brittle branch trees
Question 5: Please comment on any other pre-disaster mitigation actions that the planning committee should consider for reducing future losses caused by disasters:
• More public awareness to the community for Covid-19 pandemic. • Optimizing use of cell phone emergency notifications
• We have more than enough government involvement.
• Drought
• Warning on possible power outage during extreme weather • Have enough water treatment pumps in dos palos
• The vaccine roll-out seems to be going well. Keep up the good work through education and availability.
• Food security and green spaces
• Wildfires and staging or evacuation area.
• Global Pandemics!!!
• Better signs to get to where you need to go. Better planning for the future hazards. • Wildfires tree thinning
• Improvements of the levee to prevent flood.
• Education for the public
• Text messaging is the best source of contact No one listens to radio anymore or watch's local TV as much
• Stay at home order to avoid smoke inhalation
• Wildfire fire prevention along with saving water from snow melt. • All types of production plants should be set to a high standard when it comes to taking all steps available to ensure they are as planet friendly as technology allows it. • Water (dry wells) in Le Grande is an issue
• The effects of a prolonged public safety power shut off by a utility company • Mostly just water conservation! So many green lawns and people washing their driveways. • Better figure out where you will get a drink after the underground water is salty.
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
2021 Reference Material
3 537
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey 2021
• Most of the listed activities were flood related. Flood is important, but so are many other potential hazards. Mitigation activities should be diversified.
• Power Outage Prevention. Proper preventative maintenance of the electrical grid in fire prone areas.
• The state needs to give the farmers the water instead of dumping it. Our ground water is depleting because of this. San Luis Dam was built for agriculture 1st. • Protect city from cyber attack, ex city services compromised due to computer failure/shutdown • Wildfire education
• Pay attention to seismic activity anywhere near the faults and how can homeowners prevent any future catastrophe to their properties. Education on Insurance and special programs to make it affordable is crucial. Before buying a house disclosure on flooding and earthquake or May other natural disaster-prone areas including where dams are located matter and should be disclosed. • Air filters and water. Air filters for fire season and water for droughts • Possibly look into quarterly or bi-annual training with agencies in affected areas. • Alert residents when prescribed fires are taking place. Often time when the foothills or farmlands are having controlled fires the smoke affects the air quality of residents of surrounding communities. Since such burns must have special permissions, the agencies issuing such permissions should also notify citizens in the surrounding communities. • Water
• Build a sanctuary that wildlife can live in post wildfire disaster until their homes can be restored. • Mejor construccion de los edificios y/o casas en base a los terremotos Translation: Better construction of buildings and/ or houses based on earthquakes • Cuidado de comida
Translation: Food care
• La Erosion de la tierra que esta ocasionando que el agua escasee mas. Y a futuro las Cosechas no serviran. Si no planificaramos con tiempo la perdida del agua del subsuelo. Ya que ano con af\o no llueve y la Nieve que cae no es suficiente para el Aumento de la poblaci6n que crece cada dia.
Translation: The erosion of the land that is causing the water scarcity more. And in the future the harvests won 't do. If we did not plan in advance the loss of groundwater. Since year after year it does not rain and Falling snow is not enough. Increase in the population that grows every day.
• Mantener la basura en su lugar
o Translation: Keep trash in its place
• Reducci6n de tarifa de luz en verano por el uso de aires acondicionados Translation: Reduction of electricity rates in summer due to the use of air conditioners Question 14: Optional: Provide any additional comments you have which you feel are relevant for the Hazard Mitigation plan update:
• I believe Merced Co. is free of hazards or disasters. • Mitigation efforts should heavily consider ways to offset climate change • Enjoy the ride. Each day as it comes.
• What, if anything, is being done about the water in Los Banos? • Please focus on food security and public health that take a preventative approach to disasters? Also focus on ensuring the community will be fine regardless of whether there is a disaster Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
2021 Reference Material
4 538
Open Ended Responses from Public Survey 2021
• Better planning and education and awareness. I was never contacted for my 2nd vaccination as I was told I would. I almost missed my deadline for it. I had to research when abs where the next vaccine would be.
• HR Support is probably the worst provider partnered by the county in these Covid 19 vaccinations.
• I can't believe they are eliminating at burning for attrition • Just a thank you for giving us a voice ...
• How are you using social media to distribute information and educate the residents of your county? Let us know if we can help you?
• Lack of community organization. Atwater declaring itself a sanctuary city is a prime example. • I'm not sure how useful this survey of the general public will be for planning purposes. I am an active and informed member of the community, and even I didn't feel qualified to answer most of these questions.
• This is the first time I have heard of our area having a disaster plan. More community education is needed for this subject topic.
• Que la cosas se hagan por El bien de todas las Comunidades y se tome acci6n inmediata. o Translation: That things be done for the good of all communities and take immediate action
Merced County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
2021 Reference Material
5 539
MEfiCED
COUNTY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
3500 NORTH APRON AVENUE
ATWATER, CA 95301
OFFICE (209) 385-7548
FAX(209) 725-0174
CONTACT: Battalion Chief David Scheurich: (209) 385-7548
MIKE VAN LOBEN SELS
Director
(209) 966-3622
DAVID SCHEURICH
Deputy Director-Administration
(209) 38~7548
NOTICE OF PUBLIC WORKSHOP FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE
MERCED COUNTY MUL Tl-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Merced County and its six participating jurisdictions (City of Merced, City of Atwater, City of Los Banos, City of Livingston, City of Dos Palos, City of Gustine) have launched a planning effort to assess risks from natural, human-health, and human-caused hazards and to identify ways to reduce those risks. The planning process will result in an update to the County's existing Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP). A MJHMP update is required under the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 to be eligible to receive federal disaster assistance and funding.