Agenda packet — Los Banos City Council, October 19, 2022 (part 2 of 2)

The fees will be expended for the acquisition. installation. and construction of the public facilities identified on the Needs List and other authorized uses, as that is the purpose for which the fees are collected. As previously stated, all new development creates either a direct impact on public facilities or contributes to the cumulative impact on public facilities. Moreover, this impact is generally equalized among all types of development because it is the increased demands for public facilities created by the future residents and employees that create the impact upon existing facilities.

For the aforementioned reasons, new development benefits from the acquisition, construction, and installation of the facilities on the Needs Lists.

D. DETERMINE HQW 1):IERE IS A REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP 8ETwEEN DiE NEED FOR 11fE 'PUBuc FACIU1Y AND THE IYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PR<>,l£cT UPON WHICH 1lfE FEE IS IMpOSED (IMPACT RELATIONSHIP) (GOVERNMENT CODE $EC]JON 66001(A,)(4}} As previously stated. all new development within the City. irrespective of location. contributes to the direct and cumulative impacts of development on public facilities and creates the need for new facilities to accommodate growth. Without future development, many of the facilities on the Needs Lists would not be necessary. For certain other facilities, the costs have been allocated to both existing and new development based on their level of benefit.

For the reasons presented herein, there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities included on the Needs List and all new development wi.thin the City.

Cfty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
301
E.
dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTION II

LEGAL REQUIREMENTS TO

JUSTIFY DEVELOPMENT

IMPACT FEES
1lfE RELATIONSHIP BE'IWEEN THE AMOUNT OF nfE FEE AND THE COST OF THE Pueuc fAcnmESA]TRIBtrrAD~ IO '[HE 'QMLQP.MENTUPoN WHICH THE FEE!$ IMPOSED C-ROUGH PROPORTIONAl.l'rv- RELATIONSHIP) (GoVERNMENT CODE 66001(A) As set forth above, au new development in the City impacts public facilities.

Moreover, each individual development project and its related increase in population and/or employment along with the cumulative impacts of au development in the City, will adversely impact existing facilities. Thus, imposition of the fee to finance the facilities on the Needs Lists is an efficient practical, and equitable method of permitting development to proceed in a responsible manner.

New development impacts facilities directly and cumulatively. In fact, without any future development, the acquisition, construction, and/or installation of many of the facilities on the Needs Lists would not be necessary as existing City facilities are generally adequate. Even new development located adjacent to existing facilities will utilize and benefit from facilities on the Needs List.

The proposed fee amounts are roughly proportional to the impacts resulting from new development based on the analyses contained in Section V. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the facilities.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justlficatfon Study
302
d a wv.r,,., .-ine1111,cDTA con,

SECTION III

DEMOGRAPHICS
In order to determine the public facilities needed to serve new development as well as establish fee amounts to fund such facilities, the City provided OTA with projections of future population and development within the City. OTA categorized developable residential land uses as Single Family, Multi-Family, and Age Restricted Oevelopable nonresidential land uses within the City's commercial. industrial. and office zones are categorized as Retail, Office, Industrial and Institutional. Additional details are included in the table below. Based on these designations, OTA established fees for the following seven (7) land use categories to acknowledge the difference tn impacts resulting from various land uses and to make the resulting fee program implementable.

Table 1: City of Los Banos - SummaJY of Land Use Categories

LAND USE
CLASSifICATIONS DEFINITION
Single Family
Multi-family
Age Restricted
Retail
Office
Institutional
City of Los Sanos
Includes single family attached and detached homes.

Includes buildings with attached residential units including apartments. townhomes, condominiums, and all other residential units not classified as Single Family.

For purposes of determining the impact fees due, any •second unit· or "'accessoJY dwelling unit· (as determined pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code} shall be considered a separate residential unit and shall be subject to this fee.

Includes single family attached and detached homes which are developed, substantially rehabilitated, or substantially renovated for, senior citizens. At least 80 percent (%) of the occupied units include at least one resident who is verified to be over the age of 55, and the community follows a policy that demonstrates an intent to provide housing for those aged 55 or older.

Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:
• Retail
• Service-oriented business activities
• Department stores, discount stores, furniture/appliance outlets, home improvement centers
• Entertainment centers
• Sub-regional and regional shopping centers
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:
• Business/professional office
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:
• Professional medical offices and hospitals
• Schools
• Other public uses
Development Impact Fee Justification Study .. ., ............ = I I 9
303
dta
www.FinanceDTA com

LAND USE

CLASSIFICATIONS DEFINITION

SECTION III

DEMOGRAPHICS
Includes, but is not limited to, buildings used as the following:
• Light manufacturing, warehouse/distribution, logistics, wholesaling Industrial • Wholesale and warehouse retail
• Service-oriented commercial activities
• Automobile dealerships
• Support commercial services
The City of Los Banos Housing Element was used to estimate the number of housing units and non-residential building square feet to be built within the City. These figures are generally confirmed by the City's 2030 General Plan (the ·General Plan·), the California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit, and the U.S. Census Bureau. In addition, the forecasts and the General Plan were used to project the additional population generated from new development.

Notably. OTA attempted to utilize metrics (e.g. average household size) that standardized existing demographics with the projections found in the General Plan. Futur:e residents and employees will create additional demand for facilities that cannot be adequately served by existing public facilities. In order to accommodate new development in an orderly manner, while maintaining the current quality of life in the City, the facilities on the Needs List (see Section IV), as presented to and reviewed by City Council and City staff, along with community stakeholders, will need to be constructed. For those facilities that are needed to mitigate demand from new development, facility costs have been allocated to new development only. In those instances when it has been determined that the new facilities will serve both existing and new development, facility costs have been allocated based on proportionate level of benefit (see Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("Eou·) discussion in Section V).

The following sections summarize the existing and future development figures that were used in calculating the impact fees.

1. Existing Population for Land Use categories
A. According to information provided by the City of Los Banos and obtained from the California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit, and generally confirmed by the U.S. Census Bureau, there are currently 34,251 existing Single Family, 4,922 Multi-Family residents, and 454 Age Restricted residents residing in 9,758, 1,753, and 239 units, respectively, within the City.

B. OTA has used the following demographic information from the California Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, which assumes a City resident-per-unit factor of 3.51 per Single Family unit, 2.81 per Multi-Family unit (approximately four-fifths of the Single Family rate), and 1.90 per Age City of Los Banos December SJ, 2019 / iQ Development Impact Fee Justification Study 304
d

SECTION III

DEMOGRAPHICS
www F-inanceDT A com
Restricted unit. TheTefore, the City population is generally comprised of 39,627 residents living in 11.750 Single Family, Multi-Family and Age Restricted homes. Importantly, many figures may not sum due to rounding.

C. Table 2 below summarizes the existing demographics for the residential land uses.

Table 2: City of Los Banos Estimated Existing Residential Development ,---- ------~--- -- ----- - -- - ---
A~erage Household l Res1dcnt1al Land Use Existing Existing Housing Residents Units Size !
Single Family Residential 34,251 9,758 3.51
Multi-Family Residential 4,922 1,753 2.81
Age Restricted Residential 454 239 1.90
TotaVAverage 39,627 11.750 NA
OTA has also utilized the following demographic information which estimates existing City employees using employees-per-thousand-square-foot factors of 4.00,

3.00, 1.50, and 1.00 employees per 1,000 building square feet of Retail, Office, Institutional, and Industrial, respectively. This results in a total of 13,982 existing employees, comprised of 2,221 Retail employees, 6,370 Office employees, 419 Institutional employees, and 4,973 Industrial employees within the City, as shown in Table 3 below.

Importantly, for many of the facilities considered in this Fee Study, EDUs are calculated based on the number of residents or employees ("Persons Served·) generated by each land use class. Persons Served equals Residents plus SO% of Employees and is a customary industry practice designed to capture the reduced levels of service demanded by employees. For existing Persons Served estimates, please reference Table 3.

Cfty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justtrtcatlon Study
December 31. 201.9 /
/ 11
305
d
www FinanceDT A com

SECTION III

DEMOGRAPHICS
Table 3: City of Los Banos Estimated Existing Non-Residential Development - -- -- ---- ~ -- - ------ - ---" - --7
i Non- Residential Employees Existing Persons Served Existing Persons I Land Use per 1,000 Employees* per 1,000 B.S.F. Served [11 I B.S.F. I
[ ___ _ - - - -- - ~- ---·-------------- -- - ---- -- -- - - --« --~ .....

Retail 4.00 2,221 2.00 1.110
Office 3.00 6,370 1.50 3,185
Institutional 1.50 419 0.75 210
Industrial 1.00 4,973 0.50 2,486
Total/Average NA 13,982 NA 6.991
* .May not sum due to rounding.
(11 Persons Served equal Residents plus 50% of employees.

2. Future Population for New Land Use Categories (2038) A According to information provided by the City and the Merced County Association of Governments, in 2038 (the time horizon utilized for this Fee Study) the City is projected to include an additional 4,155 Single Family units, 736 Multi-Family units, and 44 Age Restricted units.

B. OTA has used the following demographic information which assumes City future resident-per-unit factors of 3.51, 2.81.. and 1.90 per Single Family unit, Multi-Family unit, and Age Restricted unit respectively. This results in an additional 16,735 residents living in 4,935 Single Family, Multi-Family and Age Restricted homes Citywide.

C. Table 4 summarizes the future demographics for the residential land uses.

Table 4: City of Los Banos Future Residential Development - - - --··- ·--- -· - -
j Residential Land Use Projected Projected ~v-~~~ge Household I Residents Housing Units Size I ----------------, -- --~ -- ---- ----- ----- Single Family Residential 14,.584 4,155 3.51
Multi-Family Residential 2,068 736 2.81
Age Restricted Residential 84 44 1.90
TotaVAverage 16,735 4,935 NA
As noted previously, OTA estimated City employees using employees-per-thousandsquare-foot factors, provided by the City, of 4.00, 3.00, 1.50, and 1.00 employees per 1,000 building square feet of Retail, Office, Institutional, and Industrial. respectively.

This resulted in the projection of an additional 952 Retail employees, 2,731 Office City of Los Sanos December 3.1., 201.9/
12 Development Impact Fee Justification Study
306

SECTION III

DEMOGRAPHICS
employees, 180 Institutional employees, and 2,132 Industrial employees Citywide, as shown in Table S on the following page.

Again, for many of the facilities considered in this Fee Study, EDUs are calculated based on the number of residents or employees (·Persons Served·) generated by each land use class. Persons Served equals Residents plus SO% of Employees and is a customary industry practice designed to capture the reduced levels of service demanded by employees. For future Persons Served estimates, please reference Table S.

Table 5: City of Los Banos Future Non-Residential Development - - ~ Employees i
Non- Persons Served Future
Residential per 1,000 ruture
per 1.000 Persons
I Land Use Bu1ldmg Employees Building S.F. Served [1] •S.F. I - ----- ---~ ~ - - Retail 4.00 952 2.00 476
Office 3.00 2,731 1.50 1.365
Institutional 1.50 180 0.75 90
Industrial 1.00 2,132 0.50 1,066
Total/Average NA 5,995 NA 2,997
[1) Persons Served equal Residents plus 50% of employees.

3. Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) and Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) Projections EDUs are a means of quantifying different land uses in terms of their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility. Since nearly all of the facilities proposed to be financed by the levy of impact fees will serve both residential and non-residential property, OTA projected the number of future EDUs based on the number of residents or employees generated by each land use class. For other facilities, different measures, such as trip generation rates and water demand, more accurately represent the benefit provided to each land use type. The EDU projections for each facility are shown in the fee derivation worksheets in Appendix A.

Cfty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justfficatton Study
December 31, 2019 /
1 13
307
dta
www.FinanceDTA com

SECTION IV

NEEDS LIST
Identification of the facilities to be financed is a critical component of any development impact fee program In the broadest sense, the purpose of impact fees is to protect the public health. safety, and general welfare by providing for adequate public facilities. ·Public Facilities· per Government Code Section 66000 includes ·public improvements, public services, and community amenities:

Government Code Section 66000 requires the identification of those facilities for which impact fees are going to be used as the key financing mechanism. Identification of the facilities may be made in an applicable general or specific plan, other public documents, or by reference to a Capital Improvement Program C-CIP").

OTA has worked closely with City staff to develop the list of facilities to be included in the 'Fee Study (the ·Needs List·). Additionally, the Needs List was presented to and reviewed by City Council and has been introduced at numerous Stakeholders' Meeting. For purposes of the City's fee program. the Needs List is intended to be the official public document identifying the facilities eligible to be financed, in whole or in part through the levy of a development impact fee on new development within the City. The Needs List is organized by facility element (or type) and includes a cost section consisting of six (6) columns, which are defined in Table 6 on the following page. Actual needs are likely to change over time as a result of changing technology and approaches for delivering public services. The Needs List is illustrative of the required facilities if all the facilities were constructed and operational as of the date of this study. The fees may be used on (any) facility which serves a similar function and purpose as those facilities identified on the Needs List.

Table 6: City of Los Banos Needs List Explanation of Cost Section Column Title Contents Source
The total estimated facillty cost including
Total Cost for Facility engineering, design, construction, land City acquisition, and equipment (as applicable)
Offsetting Revenues to Share of Total Offsetting Revenues allocated to New and Existing new and existing development City Development
Net Cost to City The difference between the Total Cost and the Calculated by OTA Offsetting Revenues (column 1 plus column 2) Percent of Cost Net Cost Allocated to New Development based Allocated to New on New Development's Share of Facilities Calculated by OTA and City Development
Net Cost Allocated to The Net Cost to City Multiplied by the Percentage Calculated by OTA New Development Cost Allocated to New.Development City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
308
d
WWW FinanceDTA WIT'

SECTION IV

NEEDS LIST
Column Title Contents Source
Policy Background or Identifies policy source or rationale for facility Objective need
City General Plan, Water
Master Plan, Sewer Master
Plan, Storm Drainage Master
Plan, Traffic Master Plan,
Capital Improvement Plan,
and Council Objective
OTA surveyed City staff and on the required facilities needed to serve new development as a starting point for its fee calculations. The survey included the project description, justification, public benefit, estimated costs, and project financing for each proposed facility. Through discussions between OTA and City staff, the Needs List has gone through a series of revisions to fine-tune the needs, costs, and methodologies used in allocating the costs for each facility.

The final Needs List ts shown on the following pages and can additionally be found included as Appendix B.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December ,1, 2019 I
1 15
309
d a
www.F1rianceDTA com
bl 121
hdllly- T...aCoa,.._ Off- - A.RlllEPIIOl'llC'IDfMaU'IID 1-SUncl.--11111EOCI
•--.- -- so J.,,._ kP0.000 ·------o1Ulo11111NI.- SMUD $0 ·-· - so
.Mit-"W'9" t$3'.UU231 l'lnr---.... t!!- m...-!lln -ALl'ln& PliQll(lltlm FM:IIJTIES $19.l!IO.ffl ,ttt'4..$1J» LPOI.ICZMCIIJllllS
1-- SMlfl0.000 so
·-- S12.SOO.OOO so , __ - so
·-- SU45.7S2 , __ - so
......... , so
TOTAL1U.ICE.FACRffllS
PDlieeF.atdlt ~not ~ _..,
c, ___ ,
i ........ _ - so
·--·- 512.- so , __ - so
-- r.cBillellkw:nuel.not
TOl'AJ..PARICS MID IIECIZl?ATIOH FACD.ffllS - ~ ...... D. Jfa'.11!1 FM:IUffl!S 1 -W--l'llnll!n<la....m6T_,
- ,,.. ......
·--·-- $250.000 so J-AoplMaWO -.000 so •-Ins $!.W.800 so •-at $U2Q,000 so ·-- - so 7 Wd RalalJllllillGn sua,.aao so
·- $419.DQO so , _____ ......,.
- so ID-- .. __ $U.lMIUlOO $0 .,..... llD.811.000 so
!2!)11. ---- WA]!!! FACIUTIES - JW.971>,!!I
City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
"' lfdc:o.tloCitr
-
---
---
t!i,!4',560!
!!!!!B,"'7
---
S,.NU12
-
-
512.- -· Sl.!IIWXIO
sm.m.su $2IO.DOO
$LAO.GOO
SUW,00
-
$1,-
-
-· IWM0.000 -llD-000
It!

SECTIONN

NEEDS UST
I!) 151
-OfCo,t -.. Co,t-..
_.....,_ __ !low ,,_..._.
-
Ii.an
It- -w - --- --- - - a..dObjll9A8ll SZDS.204
1!9J!ZX - --~ i$474U6tll
,a.au 2-
-
SUR
_,.

U.68X -
Sl.O!UIS
s..-....
-- --- -----...-o- sg- - -~- ....... ~- - $R.l'Ell,225
--- SS.SQ.020
-- ------ n.74;! ~.a,40
- '8U77.22S
....... 29- 57049
ga.401 -,,.._- --- -·,. - --- -1-Ran 2!1.74"'
- -- -~-- - $461.lm

29.74"'

29.74,. 56.916.ffl
- --- --Ra• .......
a- $.1.-
ss.- --- --- --- ~- -
Decem..,..,_..,. / 116
310
d a WWW f inanceDTA COM
.IS--UN -....... - so ,..,..._....,. u........ so 1.-a,p-- ~ so 4111rNtS\annlal:fJ IUSOJJOO so ·--- - so I .llfflnon Slarm Uw -- so 1MumllaSIDrmUIW - so I Pac:hNo Storm Lb - so ICl:rms-.lSClanD~ - ID JOH .. DllnaltSIDrmUne - so .UH .. Ncnda-U. - so .., _____ ........ so Uo.tlllltt,_...Slalloft~ - .. Ztw.T1'Hllllllwolb SU,S,000 ,. __ PV.000 so ,. ____ - so JIWWl't'•O:IMMIChiaill' - ,. II fllaaillltW..LIMIDWWTP - so UScbr ........... ..__ so ·- $1.0SS.000 .. .11:Wldlwallr'lnatrMrtfln KIAOOO ,.
--- w.sm.ooo
,._ ......... - -..__ lO
,. __ .. _ ·--
D.,_Tnrl< -SS00.000 ts::Mo,ooo; /l/J-- aoa.ooo l$Ull.000) TOTM.SBWlll FACIUTIES 2:1-
,. ---~ . ,..,., ... ,~ IMrparlHo.l..._.. - ""'""' -- 11.16100&) $ CbNITarnm~
-- IHUOOJ
•CollogoGnmoNo.t- - UZ.401(,001
S~GNINHG.Z,.,._,. - 15'.C2'J001
•a.lcltdit-No.t ...... - 5UJ.Gl$,OOOI
7a.lallltNo.Z~ -- ruoo.0001 ·---- -000 ~Oll10!>J
SI CilMINNo.l..SC..--lf&Z~
,,_ 1$74Cl.000l
SOGordonlNo.lMI-
-- ~Sl."7.000)
.Ukllnonflllcl~ - ~mooc:, Jt_._._.tfo.S~ ,,.. .. 000 [$!.l2Ul00) if llndlwoDdND.ZM-1111111 - ........... , 14-No.·--
- 'iU!He.,11001
.ISWalMartHo.l..,.__ 117.230.000 ti7.1S0..600t
.lfW._,lfo.2....._. $12.'1111.000 ii:~ooo,
TOl"AL!!:5!!!:!0IWNMZP.\Cllfflll 't22!!QIIQO i••u~&'C:'l IW.ORNOJ-......,...,. -- .. a.,_.._.-.,.,_. "'"""' .. ._ , .... _ ID.OW.OSI so .... ___ - .. ·--- ,.,.....,. so tDowilhll~ - so ·--- .......... so , CadaMltll,.Mad:lla,r,\wa .. ,.,_~ - so , __ .,,._ .10 Tnfflc Mulllr Pllln --SI00.000 "' so "---- P4l000 .. ,.,.,,., l!!I~ 11Wl1C FACllffllS - !BH!&!!l llW-Ml:llmESl!;!l!:l!!,"'--Conlo•.!!!ll!!ll-wl ___ .,_~,---. • . JCO,Hell-·- .., __ ...... _ 17,IW.0,C, .. $UOl.7'l0 .. , ___ - .. ·-- - ,_ .... _ ~ .. a...,a,~,-:s--.,__ ·---- -· !2[@; c.EM'EIIAl GOVIRNM!HT FACfUTla !el!!:m !2!M.AU. PM:JU'l1ES I?Z~H1.'\M . ,.,
UJ
..,._ .... __ .., DtwlOpffilntl'flPl,Ctfund:lllilnclluofAalY-,zoss-zmtl:nll Bl -.mws.Majorilyo/~~.clbe.WtoP11YlofdebtWMCC1Qr1U.'0"'1l)OINd~Slation.

City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
"
saoo.oao
-
$1.Z!0.000
SI.- -
-- - -- --
SW.DOD -
,. _
-- .. _ -- ....... -000 .. _ -
PL'!.000 ··- ....... -000
- ·-
- - ......
--- ---....... Sl."'2.SOO
$1.0SlOOO ·-
- --000 -- -
SI.- -·-....... so 0- so ..,_
"' 0.-
- .. _ ~ 11Jl:4SS Ma!!J
so
16 ·-
OJIOIC
so
so ·- .. ·- .. ·- --so ......
·-..... ,,,.,000
so -- .. ·-..... so Q.OOI<
$17.-000
..
.. -·- so ··-
·-
l!Z-fffa! !!-
$1.ffl.!06 ...... ..... ... SIS.Of1.l151 -.......
- ...... ,._.....,. 29.NI.
$32f.4U ...... .......... ,._ WU.,00 ...... ......... ""·""' -- - at.Ml<
l,B.4SIDW ii.?!!
,, ........ ....,,.
"""""" .. .-
- ·- ,_
-- ..
-.....
!!!f!!
_.mm

SECTION IV

NEEDS LIST
_,.. __ ....
--
SI.HU29
........ --- --- -........ --- --- -........
-
.....
---
--- --- --- --
_,., --- --- --- a_......,
'41,GS --- --- - --- --- ... --
saz,,,so,
-
......, --- --- --- --- __ .... .........
-..,. so
... --- --- --- -04?
..
.. --- --- --- --- 1!?;.t4, JIZ
.. Stom\lhlr\ .... Rlr.
so SaffiDIMMllta",._,,.
.. SlOff'nClniWl ... Plln
so St.-n~-111:11\
.. ...,,, .... Mlatift'flaa
so Slffll'IDIU\--.Ptan
- ltolfflDrul,..,..Pllrl
.. S\olmDtul .........
- S\ClffllDru'I.Mlltr.Rln
.. ltonP.Orui ...... Rlft
so SulnnDrll'IMlmr"Rlfl
IO SlorftlDmft--llllJ\
flll,"1l.214 srotm'DrmMatm"Jllan
IO 5'clnt'IDIDIMaal''lbJil.

IO SUsnntlira!IIMal.-"-"
.. S\ormtlrm ....... flaf!.
""'"ll..A."'-'l
H!Bl,""11
_...,.
- ---°"- -
-
---........
- --
---------- ,. __
- --
_, __ ta22.IOO Cqb,t~ Air.

I!!.!!!-
IUliU19
WIOll,IW ---- -- --- --- - """""'°"-
sug ...
!!!!.I...,.,,
December :JJ. 2019 I
/ 17
311
d

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
www .Finance Of A.con,
There are many methods or ways of calculating fees, but they are all based on determining the cost of needed improvements and assigning those costs equitably to various. types of development. Each of the fee calculations, with the exception of parks and traffic, employs the concept of an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (''EDU·) or Equivalent Benefit Unit ( 0 Eeu·1 to
allocate benefit among the seven (7) land use classes. EDUs are a means of quantifying different land uses in terms of their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit for each type of public facility. For many of the facilities considered in this Fee Study, EDUs are calculated based on the number of residents or employees ("Persons Served") generated by each land use class. Park Facilities have been evaluated. according to the existing parks standard of

4.82 acres per 1,000 residents. as detailed in Section V and Appendix A-3. For Traffic Facilities, number of vehicle trips more accurately represent the benefit provided to each land use class and are demonstrated separately in Section V.

Table 7 below shows total existing and projected EDUs or EBUs. by facility type. Notably, Persons Served equal Residents plus 50% of Employees and is a customary industry practice designed to capture the reduced levels of service demanded by employees.

Table 7: Equivalent Dwelling Units
I - - --~~---- ----------T
Facility Type Service ractor
-- --l- -- Existing Pro3ected
CDU's/EBU's EOU's/EBU's
i - - - -- ____ _L ___ --- I --~~-- -
Traffic
Fire
Police Persons Served and 13,282 5,622 Sewer
Storm Drainage
/or Usage Factor
General Government
Water [11 30.853 17,571
Acres peT 1.000 11,290 4.768 Park Development [2] Residents [11 Special case - the Surface Water Treatment Plant utilizes a separate sphere of influence EDU metric. (2) Park development fee calculations used only projected EBUs. i
In determining a reasonable nexus for each specific type of public facility. OTA utilized one of the methodologies discussed below, depending upon the data and other information available from the City, and its current infrastructure policies. The fee methodologies employ the concept of an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") to allocate benefit among various land use classes. EDUs are a means of quantifying different land uses regarding their equivalence to a residential dwelling unit, where equivalence is measured in terms of potential infrastructure use or benefit from each type of public facility.

City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
312
d a www F1:ia"lce:J" rr

PLAN-BASED FEE METHODOLOGY

SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Plan-based methodology used by OTA to establish the development impact fees used in this report is based on a "Plan,· such as a Master Plan of Facllittes, Capital Improvement Plan or City General Plan, which identifies a finite set of improvements. These facility plans generally identify a finite set of facilities needed by the public agency and are developed according to assessments of facilities needs prepared by staff and/or outside consultants and adopted by the public agency's legislative body. Using this Plan-Based approach, specific costs can be projected and assigned to all land uses planned. often with a specific time period in mind that reflects new development projections. By using population and commerciaVtndustrial square footage numbers provided by the City and other sources, it is possible to assign development impact fee levels by percentage between new and existing development. This methodology was used to calculate Traffic, Fire, Police, Water, Sewer and Storm Drainage fees. In preparing an impact fee analysis, facilities costs can be allocated in proportion to the demand caused by each type of future development.

STANDARDS-BASED FEE METHODOLOGY
The Standards-based methodology used to establish the development impact fees used in this report are based on ·standards" where costs are based on units of demand. This method establishes a generic untt cost for capacity, which is then applied to each land use per unit of demand. Parle fees examined in this report are an excellent example of this type of fee structure. In this study, the Standards-based methodology is used to calculate Park Development fees. This methodology provides several advantages, including not needing to know the cost of a specific facility, how much capacity or service is provided by the current system or havtng to commit to a specific size of the facility.

The methodologies used for each specific facility are presented on the following page in Table 8. The Equivalent Dwelling Units for each specific facility are presented in Table 9.

The Facility Type of Traffic ts not included in Table 9 because it is based on Trip Generation Rate rather than Equivalent Dwelling Units.

City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 31. 2019 /
/ 19
313
I
I
i
I
I
d a

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
WYM" HnanceDTA com
Table 8: City of Los Banos Methodology (By Facility Type) - - ----·- - ----~-- - -- --- Sources of Apportioning I Facility Methodology Units of Measure Type Costs . -- - - - - - - ---- -- ~- -- - ---- ! _______ - ---~-~ - - - - . --- - . - Traffic Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Trip Generation Rate Fire Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Persons Served Police Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Persons Served Water Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Persons Served Sewer Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan ·Persons Served Storm Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Persons Served Drainage Parks Standards-based Existing Standard Acres per 1,000 residents General Plan-based Existing Infrastructure Plan Persons Served Government Table 9: City of Los Banos Equivalent Dwelling Units
% Increase I
; Countywidc Facility Existing Projected {Existing to Total I l Type EOUs/EBUs EDVs/EBUs Projected) ---------------- -- - -- - ---- - I Fire 13,282 5,622 42% 18,904
Police 13,282 5,622 42% 18,904
Parks 11,290 4,768 42% 16,058
Wate..-. 13,282 5,622 42% 18,904
Sewer 13,282 5,622 42% 18,904
Storm Drainage 13,282 5,622 42% 18,904
General Government 11,290 4,768 42% 16.058
* Special Case - the Surface Water Treatment Plant utilizes a separate sphere of influence EDU metric.

The following sections present the reasonable relationship of benefit, impact. and rough proportionality tests for each fee element (i.e .• fire facilities, police facilities, park facilities, water facilities, sewer facilities, storm drainage facilities, traffic facilities, and general government facilities) and the analysis undertaken to apportion costs for each type of facility on the Needs List. More detailed fee calculation worksheets for each type of facility are included in Appendix A.

Importantly, given that the level of service ("tos·) requested for new development by the City is above the existing service level for certain types of facilities, the costs of the new City of Los Banos December 31, 2019 /
Development Impact Fee Justtffcatfon Study / 2 Q
314
F ma 1cen... corr

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
facilities have been carefully apportioned between existing and new development in the following manner:

1. New development was assigned 100% of the cost for a LOS that is equivalent to the existing LOS within the City.

2. The cost of the incremental difference between the new, higher LOS being requested by the City and the existing LOS was then allocated between existing development and new development, based on the relative number of EDUs assigned to existing development and new development.
ctty of Los Banos
Deveropment Impact Fee Justification Study
December 31. 2019 /
1 21
315
d
www f inenceDT A corn
A. FIRE FACILITIES

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Fire Faciltties category includes those facilities required within the City to maintain adequate public safety services by the fire department. In order to serve new development through buildout the City identified the need for additional Fire Station service points, an updated training facility, and vehicle and equipment replacements.

Table 10: Fire Facilities Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Fire 'Facnttles.

To build additional fire facilities to service a growing area, ldentlfy Use of Fee update training and refueling sites, and replace aging vehicles and eauipment.

New residential and non-residential development will generate additional residents and employees who will increase service Demonstrate how there ls a calls and in tum increase the need for trained public safety reasonable relationship between personnel. Equipment and vehicles used to provide these the need for the public facility, the services will have to be purchased and replaced to meet this use of the fee. and the type of increased demand. Thus, a reasonable relationship exists development project on which the between the need for Fire Facilities and the impact of residential fee is imposed and non-residential development. The Fire Facility fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for public safety purposes as identified on the Needs List.

Table 11 identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of Fire fees. The costs provided in Table 11 are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table 11: Fire Facilities Costs
I fl~ rac1ht;e~- _______ Cost - - - - -- - - -
Station 3 (Incl. Training 'Facility and EOC) $9,579,938 Fueling Station $545,000
Fire Vehicles $4,590,000
Equipment (SCBA Bottles, Radio Equipment, Jaws of Life and rel. tools) $341,639 Station4 $4,800,000
Total $19,856,577
City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 31., 2019 /
I 22
I
I
316
d
www FinarceDTA com
Calculation .Methodology

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCUlA TE FEES
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses as detailed in Appendix A~1. Each land use classification was assigned an EDU factor which was derived from the number of Persons Served, which again is defined as the persons per household (for residential units) and 50% of the number of employees per 1,000 building square feet of each category of non-residential development.

Importantly, given that the LOS requested for new development by the City is above the existing service level for certain types of facility, the cost of the new facilities has been carefully apportioned between existing and new development in the following manner.

1. New development was assigned 100% of the cost for a LOS that is equivalent to the existing LOS within the City.

Fire Facilities
According to the Ctty, it has been determined that these facilities are needed to serve new development. Station 3, importantly, has been allocated funding by the State of California pursuant to a desire to construct an Emergency Operations Center C-EOC·) to serve the region. The EOC will be constructed in conjunction with a Regional Training Facility as an extension of Station 3. The costs of the new facilities have been allocated to r:,.ew development and existing development based on their percentage of the expected facility usage at buildout. Consequently, the costs will be allocated to both existing development and new development, as outlined in the table below.

Table 12.: Fire Facilities Cost Allocation Summary
~ -----~ -
•Percentage Allocated Facility Cost
to New Development Allocated i - ------------ - - -
Existing Development 29.38% $2,941,172
New Development 70.62% $7,070,845
Total 100.00X $10,012.017
ctty of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justiffcatfon Study
December :51., 2019 I
I 23
317
dta
www FinarlceDTA.com
Fee Amounts

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Fee amounts to finance Fire Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 13.

Please refer to Appendix A-1 for details regarding the derivation of this fee.

Table 13: Fire Facilities Fee Derivation Summary
r --- ---- - - ---- - - - -------- -- ----- I~-- -- ___,;;_Uspe, . Numhecof t/L00O Fee per Untt/pec Units/Non-Res_ Cost Financed j Res. S.F. 1,000 Non~Res. S.F. l,000 s.r. By Fees - - -------- ------- - --- - - --
Single Family Residential 1.00 $1,257.77 4,155 $5.225,927 Multi-Family Residential 0.80 $1,006.21 736 $740,867
Age Restricted Residential 0.54 $680.84 44 $29,957
Retail 0.57 $716.68 238 $170,610
Office 0.43 $537.51 910 $489,297
Institutional 0.21 $268.75 120 $32,191
Industrial 0.14 $179.17 2.132 $381,995
Total Facilities Cost: $19,856,577
Offsetting Revenues ($9,844,560}
Total Allocated to New Development: $7,070,845
Total Allocated to Existing Development $2,941,172
Net Cost to ·City: $10,012,017
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-1 the fee amounts presented in Table 13 will finance 70.62% of the net costs of the Fire Facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 29.38% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

City of Los Banos December 3l. 201.9
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
I
318
d a ,,._ f I I U
B. PoUCE FACIUTIES

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Police Facilities category includes those facilities required within the City to maintain adequate public safety services by the police department. In order to serve new development through buildout, the City identified the need for a new primary police station, a new animal shelter, and equipment and vehicle needs.

Table 14: Police Facilities Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Police Facilities.

Identify Use of Fee New primary police station, a new animal shelter, and replacement of vehicles and equipment.

New residential and non-residential development will
generate additional residents and employees who will
Demonstrate how there is a
increase service calls and in tum increase the need for reasonable relationship between trained public safety personnel Equipment and vehicles used to provide these services will have to be purchased and the need for the public facility. replaced to meet this increased demand. Thus, a reasonable the use of the fee, and the type relationship exists between the need for Police Facilities and of development project on the impact of residential and non-residential development. which the fee is imposed The Police Facility fees collected from new development will be used exclusively for public safety purposes identified on the Needs List.

Table 15 below identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the collection of Police fees. The costs provided in Table 15 are based on estimates provided by the City.

Table 15: Police Facilities Costs
l 1J>olice-,facilitie t .- -~ = - - , Cost- - --71 - --·- - .-- -------------~~------- - - - - - - -- .

Primary Police Station $34,800,000
Animal Shelter $12,500,000
Range Facility $500,000
Fleet Vehicles $1,845,732
Firearms Stock $150,335
Total $49,796,067
aty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 3.1, 2019 I
1 25
319
d
www.FinanceDTA.com
Calculation Methodology

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses as detailed in Appendix A-2. Each land use classification was assigned an EDU factor which was derived from the number of Persons Served, which again is defined as the persons per household (for residential units) and SO% of the number of employees per 1,000 building square feet of each category of non-residential development.

1. New development was assigned 100% of the cost for a LOS that is equivalent to the existing LOS within the City.

3. The Animal Shelter has been evaluated under a LOS methodology (#1 above) in an effort to conservatively allocate costs.

Police 'Facilities
According to the City, it has been determined that these facilities are needed to serve new development. Currently, existing facilities are generally operating at an appropriate and acceptable level of service; therefore, the costs of the new facilities have been allocated to new development and existing development based on their percentage of the expected facility usage at buildout. Consequently, the costs will be allocated to both existing development and new development, as outlined in the table below.

Table 16: Police Facilities Cost Allocation Summary
D -
1 --- -- - -; · - - - -- Pe<c~nla~e Alloc;te~- - Facflity ;ostl eve opment ype to New Development Allocated
----------------~---------
Existing Development
New Development
Total
City of Los Banos
Development Impac:t Fee Justification Study

73.37%

26.63%
100.00%
$36,461,379
$13,234,688
$49,696,067
-.,,u••• I 26
I
320
d a www F1nanceDTA 1
Fee Amounts

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Fee amounts to finance Police FaciUties on the Needs List are presented in Table 17.

Please refer to Appendix A-2 for details regarding the derivation of this fee.

Table 17: Police Facilities Fee Derivation Summary
1~. -. -- ----- ~----------- ------ - ------7
- .. _., I.a '1f DUs per rec per -Vni.t/per Number of Cost Financed , '
I
:Land Use Tfpc ■ . ,.)Unit/1,000 1.000 Non-Res. S.F. Units/Non-Res by fees ,I . - ~- 1,Non..'.Res. S.F. 1.000 S.F . -------------·--------- - -- ------- - ---·-·------ Single Family Residential 1.00 $2,354.19 4,155 $9.781.506 Multi-Family Residential 0.80 $1,883.35 736 $1,386,701
Age Restricted Residential 0 .54 $1,274.35 44 $56,071
Retail 0.57 $1,341.42 238 $319,336
Office 0.43 $1,006.07 910 $915,831
Institutional 0.21 $503.03 120 $60,252
Industrial 0.14 $335.36 2,132 $714,99.1
Total facilities Cost: $49,696,067
Offsetting Revenues: ($100,000)
Total Allocated to New Development: $13,234,688
Total Allocated to Existing Development $36,461.379
Net Cost to City: $49,696,067
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-2, the fee amounts presented in Table 17 wilt finance 26.63% of the net costs of the Public Safety Facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 73.37% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 31, 2019 I
I 27
321
d a wv..w _ FirnmceDT A .com
C. PARK fACIUTIES

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Park Facilities category identifies facilities that Will serve the City's residents by enhancing the community's appeal and quality of life. The Fee Study includes (i} the planning and design of parkland and recreational areas needed for park and recreational facilities, and (ii) the construction and development of park and recreational facilities, including sports fields, ball fields, soccer fields, trails, restrooms, and park beautification needed to serve new and existing residential development through buildout. Notably, DTA's analysis does not include park acquisition costs, which are determined separately by the City's Quimby Ordinance.

For purposes of this Study, the Park Facilities will serve only the residents of the City by providing facilities for recreation while enhancing the community's appeal and quality of life.

Table 18: Park Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Park Facilities.

The design, construction, and development of public park Identify Use of Fee and recreational facilities, including a recreational pool facility and skate park.

New residential development will generate an increased
DemonstTate how there is a
demand for Park Facilities.
reasonable relationship Population growth has a direct impact on the need for Park between the need for the public Facilities. New development and the consequential increase facility, the use of the fee, and in demand will necessitate the improvement/expansion of the type of development project existing Park Facilities. Fees collected from new development on which the fee is imposed will be used exclusively for park, recreational, and open space facilities identified here in Section V.

1. Level of Service for Park Facilities
There are many methods or ways of calculating fees, but they are all based on determining the cost of needed improvements and assigning those costs equitably to various types of development. Fees for recreational and park facilities have been calculated utilizing both the ·standards-Based Approach" and the "Facility-Based Approach." The Standards-Based Approach utilizes a facility "standardff established for future development, against which facilities costs are determined based on ·units of demand" or a ·tevel of service· from a development. This approach establishes a generic unit cost for capacity, which is then applied to each land use type per unit of demand. This standard ts not based on the cost of a specific existing or future facility, but rather on the cost of providing a certain standard of service, such as the 4.82 acres of park and recreational facilities per 1,000 residents, which is the current level City of Los Banos December 31, 2019 / 2a
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
322
d

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
www ~inancef) r A com
of service for the City. To meet the standard of service required, the City will need to develop new park land and open space. Therefore 100% of the costs of land acquisition and development will be allocated to new residential development. The table below summarizes the existing park and recreational facilities located within the City that meet the required standard of 4.82 acres of park and recreational facilities per 1,000 residents.

Table 19: City of Los Banos Existing Level of Service
- - - --- -- -- ------ -- -
I 1 facility Units per I
'Facility Type tx1sting ·Acres _ '
-1,000 Residents ------ - -~--- --
Community Parks 88.71 2.24
Neighborhood Parks 90.94 2.29
Pocket Parlcs U.38 0.29
Total: 191.03 4.82

2. Land Acquisition and Park Development Costs
Notably, land acquisition costs are dependent on the real estate market at the time of acquisition. Location, demand for land, encumbrances, comparable acquisitions, and construction costs are a few of the many variables that play into appraisals and negotiations. Each park has its own location and improvement requirements. OTA was able to identify general cost assumptions for new park development based on comparable data for the region. Please see Table 20 for more detail regarding the costs for new parks in the City.

Table 20: City of Los Banos Cost Assumptions for New Park Development $23,841
$23,119
$1,321
$406,265 / acre
$369,332 / acre
Pocket Parks $21,105 / acre
Additional Costs
Administration 5%
* In light of the City's Quimby Fee, Land Acquisition Costs have been excluded from this analysis at this time.

Using both the level of service and cost assumptions, OT A calculated a total of City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 31, 2019 /
1 29
323
dta
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTIONV
.METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
$32,768,223 for park development costs. Please see Appendix A-3 for more information.

3. Additional Park Improvement Costs
Furthermore, the City intends to expand and enhance existing City-owned facilities to accommodate increased demand. The Capital Improvement Plan and the Public Works Department have identified the need for the following park facilities improvements to serve the 16,735 total new residents within the City - a new recreational pool facility and skate park. The total cost for these facilities is currently estimated at $13,500,000. Please see Appendix A-3 for more detail on the costs and LOS associated with these facilities.

Table 21: Park Facilities Costs
i -· -- --
' Parks Cost I --------------------- __ _J
Recreational Pool Facility $12,000,000
Skate Park $1,500,000
Total $13.500,000
Calculation Methodology
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for residential land uses only, as detailed in Appendix A-3. Each land use classification was assigned an EDU factor which was derived from the number of persons per household.

1. New development was assigned 100% of the cost for a LOS that is equivalent to the existing LOS within the City.

Based on the development projections in Appendix A-3, 29.69% of the costs of the Recreational Pool Facility will be allocated to new development, and the remaining

70.31% will be allocated to existing development. Also based on the development projections in Appendix A, 59.38% of the costs of the Skate Park will be allocated to new Ctty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study -u•• I 30
324
d
www.Flne!1ceDTA com

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
development. and the remaining 40.62% will be allocated to existing development.

Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance Park Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 22.

Further details on the derivation of this fee are included in Appendix A-3.

Table 22: City of Los Banos
Fee Derivation Summary {Net of Administrative Component) - - I I. tiJri~ Use ~ype
Number of Cost Financed 1
)
I EDUs p er'.Unit Fee per Unit - - • - - -I .. _. I Units by Fees I -- - - - - --------- ---- -- - - --- - -- - ---- --~- Single Farmly 1.00 $7,028 4,155 $29,200,209 Residential Multi-Family 0.80 $5,622 589 $4,139,645 Residential
Age Restricted 0.54 $3,804 24 $167,387 Residential
Cost Allocated to New Development: $33.507,240
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-3, the fee amounts presented in Table 22 will finance $33,507,240 of Park Facilities.

Ctty of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Juirtlficatton Study
December 31, 2019 I
1 31
325
d
www FinanceDTA com
D. WATER FACIUTIES

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Water Facilities category includes those facilities used by the City to provide basic water supply and distribution services to residents and employees within the City.

Table 23: Water Factlities Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Water Facilities.

Identify Use of Fee Improvements to certain facilities including but not limited to, water storage, supply, and distribution facilities.

Demonstrate how there New residential and non-residential development wm generate an is a reasonable increased demand for Water Facilities.
relationship between the Population and growth have a direct impact on the need for Water need for the public Facilities. Therefore, new development and the consequential facility. the use of the fee, and the type of increase in demand will necessitate the improvement/expansion of development project on existing facilities. Notably, fees collected from new development will be used exclusively on Water Facilities identified in the Needs which the fee is imposed List.

Table 24 on the following page identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the fees. The costs provided in Table 24 are based on estimates provided by the City.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
326
d

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
"
FinariceOT A corn
Table 24: Water Facilities Costs
- --- - ---~--- - - - - ---- -
·Walerfacihties Cost - - - -- - - --- -- -
Surface Water Treatment Plant (Incl. Chromium 6 Testing) $260,615,333 Groundwater Sustainability & Recharge Project $230,000
Valve Replacement $250,000
Waterlines $3,212,000
Well16 $1,620,000
Water Meters $398,528
Well Rehabilitation $1,560,000
Equipment $479,000
Storage Tanks and Booster Pumps $23,460,000
Groundwater Wells $11,340,000
Well Manifold System $10,815,000
Total $313.979,861
Calculation Methodology
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses as detailed in Appendix A-4.

The specific facilities required within the City were identified by the City and the Water Master Plan. OTA was able to determine the appropriate allocation of costs to new development based on the expected of usage of facilities at buildout. Accordingly,

52.17% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 47.83% of the costs will be allocated to new development as shown in Table 25 on the following page.

The Surface Water Treatment Plant, constituting approximately eighty-three percent (83.00%) of the Water Facilities Needs List, has been identified by the City as an essential item moving forward to meet growth demands and to ensure the continued livelihood of local residents. Included in the costs of the item are the anticipated costs of Chromium 6 testing and treatment. The state of cautomia, and more specifically the State Water Resources Control Board, has identified the need to establish a hexavalent chromium maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking water. While the Superior Court of Sacramento County invalidated the MCL established by the CDPH in 2017, the court also ordered the State Water Board to adopt a new MCL for hexavalent chromium It is anticipated that the new MCL will accompany a new timeline for compliance akin to Senate Bill 385 (SB385) which established said timeline in 2015 prior to the actions of City of Los Banos December :JJ, 2019 /
Development Impact Fee Justtftcatton Study I 33
327
dta

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
www FinanceDTAr.om
the Superior Court.

Table 25: Water Facilities Cost Allocation Summary --- - - - : Development Type Percentage Allocated Facility Cost
Allocated
----------------~ ----- ----- ·--------
Existing Development 52.17% $103,010,857
New Development 47.83% $94.458,084
Total 100.00% $197.468.941
Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance Water Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 26.

Further details regarding on derivation of this fee are included in Appendix A-4.

Table 26: Water Facilities Fee Derivation Summary
Land Use Type
EDUs per
Unit/1,000
Non-Res. S.F.

Fee per
Unit/per
1,000 NonRes. S.F.

SWTPFee
per Unit/per
l,000 NonRes. s.r-.

Number of
Units/NonRes. 1,000
SWTP
Number of
Units/NonRes. 1,000
Cost Financed
by Fees
S.f. S.F.

Sin le Family .. $1,384.06 $4,932.91 $72.177.444
Multi-Family • : t $1,107.25 $3,946.33 $10,361,980
Age Restricted 0.54 $749.21 $2,670.24 44 $913.662
Retail
Office
Institutional
Industrial

0.57 $788.64 $2,810.77 238 $398.430

0.43 $591.48 $2,108.08 910 2,771 $6,379,403

0.21 $295.74 $1054.04 120 163 $207,684

0.14 $197.16 $702.69 2,132 5.122 $4,019.479 -
Total Faauties Cost: $313,979,861
Offsetting Revenues ($U6,SJ0,921)
Total Allocated to New Development: $94,458.084
Total Allocated to Existing Development: $103,010.857
Net Cost to City: $197,468,941
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-4, the fee amounts presented in Table 26 will finance 47.83% of the net costs of the Water Facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 52.17% of the net costs of facilities Will be funded through other sources.

Cfty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
328
d a www F-inarr,eDT A.corr'
E. SEWER FACILmES

SECTIONV

ETHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Sewer Facilities category includes those facilities used by the City to provide basic water supply and distribution services to residents and employees within the City.

Table 27: Sewer Facilities Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Sewer Facilities.

Identify Use of Fee Improvements to certain facilities including but not limited to, wastewater storage, supply, and distribution facilities.

Demonstrate how there New residential and non-residential development will generate an is a reasonable increased demand for Sewer Facilities.
relationship between the Population growth has a direct impact on the need for Sewer need for the public Facilities. Therefore, new development and the consequential facility. the use of the increase in demand will necessitate the improvement/expansion of fee, and the type of existing facilities. Notably, fees collected from new development development project on will be used exclusively on Sewer Facilities identified in the Needs which the fee is imposed List.

Table 28 on the following page identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the fees. The costs provided in Table 28 are based on estimates provided by the City.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact ~ Justificatfon Study
December 3.1, 201.9 /
I 35
329
d a
www.FinanceDTA.com

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Table 28: Sewer Facilities Costs
,- -------~------ ------ - - --- -1
I Sewer racihties Cost ' - ---- - -- ------------------------- - Sewer Line Replacement $200,000
Nantes Stonn Basin $1,795,000
Central City Sub-basin $2,298,000
B Street Stonn Basin $1,230,000
Pump Station Rehabilitation $350,000
Jefferson Stonn Une $567,000
Murrieta Storm Line $161,000
Pacheco Stonn Line $453,000
Citrus Second Stonn tine $100,000
H - Illinois Stonn Une $286,000
H - Nevada Storm Line $286,000
Jo-Une Park Manor Pump Station $312,000
Crest Hills Pump Station Rehabilitation $350,000
WWTP Headworks $6,615,000
Groundwater Study $70,000
WWTP - Sludge Removal $250,000
WWTP - Cold Mix Overlay $150,000
Potable Water Une to WWfP $200,000
Solar Bee Additions $1,012,300
Equipment $1,055,000
Wastewater Treatment Plant $4,183,000
Pioneer Trunk $9,303,000
North Trunk $31,681,000
Meadowlands $1,604,000
Vineyard Trunk $1,049,000
Southeast Trunk $822,000
College Trunk $360,000
West Trunk $9,083,000
Total $75,825,300
Ctty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
330
d
Calculation Methodology

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses as detailed in Appendix A-5.

Accordingly, 45.22% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 54.78% of the costs will be allocated to new development as shown in Table 29 below.

Table 29: Sewer Faalities Cost Allocation Summary
----- - - ---- --- - --------- - - - - - -
'DevelopmC'nt Type Percentage Allocated Facility Cost
Allocated
--- --- - - - -
Existing Development 45.22% $22,489,651
New Development 54.78% $27,248,762
Total 100.00% $49,738,413
Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance Sewer Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 30.

Further details regarding on derivation of this fee are included in Appendix A-5.

City of Los Banos December 31, 2019
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
I
I
37 331
dta
www FinanceD1 A com

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Table 30: Sewer Facilities Fee Derivation Summary
- -- ---- -
i Land Use Type
EDUs per fee per Unit/per Number of Cost Unit/1,000 1.000 Non-Res. Units/Non-Res. Financed by Non-Res.

S.F. SF. 1.000 S.F. Fees
~ - ----- - --- - -- Single Family Residential 1.00 $4,847.02 4,155 $20,139,042 Multi-Family Residential 0.80 $3,877.62 736 $2,855,065
Age Restricted Residential 0.54 $2,623.74 44 $115,445
Retail 0.57 $2,761.84 238 $657,477
Office 0.43 $2,071.38 910 $1,885,595
Institutional 0.21 $1,035.69 120 $124,052
Industrial 0.14 $690.46 2,132 $1,472,087
Total 'Facilities Cost: $75,825.300
Offsetting Revenues ($26,086.887}
Total Allocated to New Development: $27,248,762
Total Allocated to Existing Development $22.489,651
Net Cost to City: $49,738,413
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-5, the fee amounts presented in Table 30 will finance 54.78% of the net costs of the Sewer Facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 45.22% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justtftcatton Study
332
d a www FinanceDlAcom

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
F. $TORM DRAINAQ FACll,flJES
The Stonn Drainage Facilities category includes those facilities used by the City to provide storm drainage services to residents and employees within the City.

Table 31: Storm Drainage Facilities Element
Identify Pu?pOse of Fee Storm Drainage Facilities.

Identify Use of Fee Improvements to certain facilities including storm drainage facilities.

Demonstrate how there New residential and non-residential development will generate an is a reasonable increased demand for Storm Drainage Facilities. relationship between the Population growth has a direct impact on the need for Storm need for the public facility. the use of the Drainage Facilities. Therefore. new development and the fee. and the type of consequential increase in demand will necessitate the development project on improvement/expansion of existing facilities. Notably, fees which the fee is imposed collected from new development will be used exclusively on Storm Drainage Facilities identified in the Needs list.

Table 32 on the following page identifies the faalities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the fees. The costs provided in Table 32 are based on estimates provided by the City.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 3'.1. 2019 /
1 39
333
d
www .FinanceDT A com

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO
CALCUlA TE FEES
Table 32: Storm Drainage Facilities Costs
- . ·- - -- --------- ------- ·- Co~;--- ·-·- I
=-
, Storm Drainage Facilities --- ------- -- - ---- -- - - - Airport No. 1 Sub-basin $778,000
Airport No. 2 Sub-basin $3,968,000
Citrus Terrace Sub-basin $67,000
College Greens No. 1 Sub-basin $12,401,000
College Greens No. 2 Sub-basin $6,029,000
Creekside No. 1 Sub-basin $10,085,000
Creekside No. 2 SUb-basin $63,923,000
Crest Hilts Sub-basin $3,015,000
Gardens No. 1 and Gardens No. 2 Sub-basin $7,580,000
Gardens No. 3 Sub-basin $11,597,000
Johnson Field Sub-basin $20,475,000
Meadowlands No. 1 Sub-basin $5,126,000
Ranchwood No. 2 Sub-basin $23,650,000
Skylark No. 2 Sub-basin $12,145,000
Walmart No. 1 Sub-basin $7,230,000
Walmart No. 2 Sub-basin $12,792,000
Total $200.861,000
Calculation Methodology
Fee amounts for this element were calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses as detailed in Appendix A-6.

The specific facilities required within the City were provided by the City's engineer. OTA was able to determine the appropriate allocation of costs to new development based on the expected usage of facilities at buitdout. Accordingly, 40.60% of the costs will be allocated to existing development and 59.40% of the costs will be allocated to new development as shown in Table 33 on the following page.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
334
d a

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
~
Table 33: Storm Drainage Facilities Cost Allocation Summary - - ---- - -- I' L
• I • I facility Cost l 'Dev~lopme·nt 1Type 1Percentage Allocated Allocated I 'J • I

L-- ----- - --------- I
----- --- -
Existing Development 40.60% $11,364,504
New Development 59.40% $16,629,864
Total 100.00% $27,994,368
Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance Storm Drainage Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 34. Further details regarding on derivation of this fee are included in Appendix A-6.

Table 34: Storm Drainage Facilities Fee Derivation Sumffl8J'Y -- -- ------- ---- 1-_:__;~ ~ ~_--=:-- --~ -;;--
~.;."";'
1 - - J~O~s per .. •- Fee per Unit/pe-r 'Number of - ' . -:\ " 'Cost Financed .~ ~aii~i)J~~ ifype , _ Ir" t Uni~/1,000 1,000 ,Nor:-'Res .. ,Units/Non-Res. lpy Fees I .· _,,1 .oncRes. ·s.r. 11 ,S.F. 1.000 S.F. -- - -- - --- -- - -- --- - - - --- Single Family Residential 1.00 $2,958.13 4,155 S12,290.816 Multi-Family Residential 0.80 $2,366.50 736 $1,742,440
Age Restricted Residential 0.54 $1,601.27 44 $70,456
Retail 0.57 $1,685.54 238 $401,257
Office 0.43 $1,264.16 910 $1,150,775
Institutional 0.21 $632.08 120 $75,709
Industrial 0.14 $421.39 2,132 $898,412 ·-
Total Facilities Cost: $200,861.000
Offsetting Revenues ($172,866,6:$2}
Total Allocated to New Development: $16.629,864
Total Allocated to Existing Development $11.364,504
Net Cost to City: $27.994,368
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-6, the fee amounts presented in Table 34 will finance 59.40% of the net costs of the Storm Drainage Facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 40.60% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

City of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December :n, 2019 /
1 41
'
335
dta
www FinanceDTA com
G. ]"RAFFIC FACILITIES

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
The Circulation Element of the General Plan includes facilities necessary to provide safe and efficient vehicular access throughout the City. In order to meet the traffic demand of new development . through buildout, the City identified the need for new road construction and equipment as shown in the Needs Ust.

Table 35: Traffic Facilities Element
Identify Purpose of Fee Traffic Facilities.

Various roadway improvements including. but not
Identify Use of Fee limited to, intersection and road widening modifications.

New residential and non-residential development will
Demonstrate how there generate additional residents and employees who will is a reasonable create additional vehicular and non-vehicular traffic Telationship between within the City limits. Streets will have to be improved or extended to meet the increased demand and traffic the need for the public signals will have to be installed to efficiently direct facility. the use of the increased traffic flow. Thus. there is a relationship fee. and the type of between new development and the need for new development project on traffic facilities. Fees collected from new development which the fee is imposed will be used exclusively for traffic facilities on the Needs Li.st.

Table 36 on the following page identifies the facilities proposed to be funded in whole or in part with the fees collected for Traffic Facilities. The costs provided in Table 36 are based on estimates provided by the City and validated by TJKM Transportation Consultants. '
Ctty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December 3.1, 2019 /
I 42
336

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Table 36: Traffic Facilities Cost
-- ------ - ~ - - - - -- -
-i : Traffic Facilities Cost
[__ - - - - - ---- ---- -- - ~ - j
Ward Road Improvements $8,095,566
Place Road Improvements $512,709
SR 165 Improvements $13,097,052
Badger Flat Road Improvements $2,899,919
Capri Avenue Improvements $2,429,922
Dove Street Improvements $329,411
Pioneer Road Improvements $2,613.483
Cardoza Rd, Madison Ave, and Page Ave Improvements $1,168,709 Intersection Improvements and Modifications $26,547,290 Traffic Master Plan $100,000
Utility Vehicles and Equipment $745,000
Total $58,539,061
Calculation Methodology
As discussed previously, Traffic Facilities benefit residents and employees by providing safe and efficient vehicular access throughout the City. As a result, the traffic fee is calculated for both residential and non-residential land uses, details of which may be found in Appendix A-7.

Fees for roads and traffic signals were calculated for each of the seven (7) land use categories based on the number of PM Peak Hour Trips generated by each land use.

Total average trips were calculated by applying these trip rates to the various dwelling unit counts and non-residential square feet identified in the demographics section of this report. The total facilities cost was then divided by the total number of trips to establish a uniform cost per trip. This unit cost was then applied to the various land uses and their respective trip generation rates to determine the proposed fees.

Expected revenue from new development was also calculated as a check, ensuring that collected fees match the calculated cost responsibility of new development.

The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual provides trip generation rates for the different land uses. These rates are estimates and subject to change; rates have been generally confirmed and approved by TJKM Transportation Consultants.

City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justlf1catlon Study
December S1, Z019 I
/ 43
337
d
www f'1nanceDTA.com

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Table 37: Traffic Facilities Cost Allocation Summary
-------- -----~-- ---- -- ------ --- - --
Development Type Percentage Allocated Facility Cost
Allocated
- - -
Existing Development 78.29% $41,071,612
New Development 21.71% $11,386,452
Total 100.00% $52,458,064
Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance Traffic Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 38 below.

Again, details regarding the analysis related to Traffic Facilities are included in Appendix A7.

Table 38: Traffic Facilities Fee Derivation Summary
- -- - -- - - - ----- - ----
I Trip Generation Fee per Number of Cos~ I Land Use Type Rate per Unit/ per Unit/per 1,000 Units/Non- Financed by 1,000 Non-Res. S.F. Non-Res.SF. Res. l,000 S.F. fees I --lammDll~~ Multi-Family Residential 0.69 $903.11 736 $664,953 i Age Restricted Residential 0.54 $703.93 44 $30,973
Retail 4.98 $6,495.18 238 $1,546,230
Office 1.00 $1,300.86 910 $1,184,184
Institutional 1.21 $1,574.04 120 $188,535
Industrial 0.85 $1,104.71 2,132 $2,355,283
Total Facilities Cost: $58.539.061
Offsetting Revenues ($6,080,997}
Total Atlocated to New Development: $11,386.452
Total Allocated. to Existing Development: $41,071.612
Net Cost to City: $52,458.064
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-7, the fee amounts presented tn Table 38 will finance 21.71% of the net costs of the traffic facilities identified on the Needs List.

The remaining 78.29% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

City of l.os Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
338
d
www F-1nar.;e1J 1 A com

SECTION V

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
H. GENERAL GOVERNMENT FACIUTIES
The General Government Facilities category includes library facilities and other facilities used by the City to provide general governmental services.

Table 39: General Government Facilities Element
Identify Purpose of General Government Facilities. (Combined fee for Corporate Fee Yard. City Hall Public Facilities and Community Center).

City Hall expansion and rehabilitation, plus other facilities used by the City to provide general governmental services.

Identify Use of Fee Table 40 identifies those facilities that serve all residents, employees, and development within the City, regardless of location.

Demonstrate how New residential and non-residential development in the City there is a reasonable will generate additional residents and employees who will relationship between increase the demand for City Hall and general government the need for the functions. Population and growth have a direct impact on public facility. the the need for government services and facilities, thus a use of the fee. and reasonable relationship exists between new development the type of and government facilities, which will have to be acquired to development project meet the increased demand. Fees collected from new on which the fee is development will be used exclusively for General imposed Government Factlities on the Needs List.

Table 40 below identifies the facilities proposed to be funded tn whole or in part with fees.

Table 40: General Government Facilities Element
- -· ~ - - - -- - ~--- -~ ~ - -- - - - - - - -- - - -- - --,l / ,General .Government i
-, - ...-- I . Cost 11 -
City Hall Expansion and Rehabilitation $7,249,050
City Hall Parking Lot and Landscaping $1,751,750
Council Chamber Upgrade $200,000
Network/Server Replacement $215,705
Corporation Yard Expansion $1,350,000
Total $10,766,505
Oty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justtftcatlori Study
December 3.1, 2019 I
/ 45
339
d
www FinanceDTA.com
Calculation Methodology

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
According to the City, it has been determined that these facilities are needed to serve new development. Currently, these facilities are generally operating at an appropriate and acceptable level of service; therefore, the costs of facilities have been allocated to new development and existing development based on their percentage of their expected facility usage at buildout.

1. New development was assigned 100% of the cost for a LOS that is equivalent to the existing LOS within the City.

General Government Facilities
According to the City, it has been determined that these facilities are needed to serve existing and new development. The costs will be allocated to both existing development and new development, as presented in Table 41 below.

Table 41: General Government Facilities - Buildings Cost Allocation Summary - - - - - ~----- ---- I I Percentage Allocated Facility Cost I I Development Type to New Development Allocated - - - - --- -- -- Existing Development 61.04% $5,245,045
New Development 38.96% $3,347,341
Total 100.00% $8,592,386
Fee Amounts
Fee amounts to finance General Government Facilities on the Needs List are presented in Table 42. Details regarding the analysis related to General Government Facilities are included in Appendix A-8.

City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
340
d

SECTIONV

METHODOLOGY USED TO

CALCULATE FEES
Table 42: General Government Facilities Fee Derivation Summary cc- - --- - - - - - - -
I [OUs per Fee per Unit/per Number of Cost Financed I Land Use 1 Type Untl/1,000 1.000 Non-Res . Units/Non-Hes.

I by Fees Non-Res. S.F. sr 1.000 s r. --- - - - -
Single Family Residential 1.00 $702.07 4,155 $2,917.072 Multi-Family Residential 0.80 $561.66 736 $413,546
Age Restricted Residential 0.54 $380.04 44 $16,722
Retail 0.00 $0.00 0 $0
Office 0.00 $0.00 0 $0
Institutional 0.00 $0.00 0 $0
Industrial 0.00 $0.00 0 $0
Total Factlities Cost: $10,766,505
Offsetting Revenues ($2.,174,119}
Total Allocated to New Development: $3,347.341
Total Allocated to Existing Development $5,2'45,045
Net Cost to City: $8,592,386
Based on the development projections in Appendix A-8, the fee amounts presented in Table 42 will finance 38.96% of the net costs of the General Government facilities identified on the Needs List. The remaining 61.04% of the net costs of facilities will be funded through other sources.

I
ctty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
December JJ, 201.9 /
I 47
341
d a WWW Fil'lanceDT A COF"I

SECTION VI

SUMMARY OF FEES
The total fee amounts required to finance new development's ·fair share" of the costs of facilities in the Needs lists are summarized in Table 43 below.

Table 43: City of Los Banos Development Impact Fee Summary Single Family $1,258 $2,354 $7,028 $6,317
Multi-family $1,006 $1.883 $5,622 $5,054
Age Restricted $681 $1,274 $3,804 $3,419
Retail $717 $1,341 $0 $3,599
Office $538 $1,006 $0 $2,700
Institutional $269 $503 $0 $1,350
Industrial $179 $335 $0 $900
City of Los Sanos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
$4,847 $2.958 $1,304
$3,878 $2,367 $903
$2,624 $1,601 $704
$2,762 $1,686 $6,495
$2,071 $1.264 $1,301
$1,036 $632 $1,574
$690 $421 $1,105
$702 $803 $27.571
$562 $638 $21.913
$380 $435 $14.925
$0 $498 $17.098
$0 $266 $9.146
$0 $161 $5,524
$0 $109 $3,740
......... JJ. ,.,. I 48
I
342

APPENDIX A
Fee Derivation
Worksheets
343

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
344
dta
Landu.or- SingteFamlly
MWUfamily
Age Restr;cted
Retail
omce
Institution at
,. Industrial __ ,
... ·• .. . - ·•· •cl, " '
Fecllllv"""" St.atlOt\ 3 (Incl. rroiriing F~c1Uty and EOCJ fuetlng SUUion
flreVehlcl(!S
Engines
Spcc/Ollzr:d Vclliclos
I c:,m,mllnd Vdtfclg
t Trallo<3 Equfpmcnt (SCBA Bottll'IS. Rltdlo Equrpment. Jaws or ure and rel. tools) SUWon4
..

SCM Air Batttes
/JrrNnh/ng/lpparatlss
Defibril/:Jtor
1-llJr!.tCtJtter..

HumPt,mps
Hur,,rR:un
Hur>< Spreader
HurstCombO r.- M•sk
Radio Equipment
Radio
Mcb/Jr:llaalo
l'rJttDbte rBdlo •/kndtit King
Part/Jb/8 Radio {price point 400)
Porr.sb1" RM/o 2 (prlc• point 9JJ/
Port,,t,/a Rad,'o 3 (prlco point BJJO/
•.•• 9 •• ,r.,.: .; ' • '
A.I Slalcn 3 lllCI. Ttelnlng F""'°'1- roe)
l•I Eldltlng
~fecllll,y
1-C)QO&'Nlo
'-f ~.
-- . .. .
l•I NumbWotllnlls ,,~U-Sf
... ~
4,155
736
44 233
910
120
2 132
,,,_ 1
20,000
5 2
4 2
105
40 5
3 3
3 2
3 so
' 2
B
9 23
21 1
lbl
TOlllFuwr. £DU',
.. ,
APPENDIX A-1
CllY OF LOS BANOS

FIRE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
-·
lb! -per Unlt/£mploylles .,.1,000 Non-Re. SF
3-51

2.81 1.90

2.00 1.50

0.75 0.50
Fectll"'u,,tb Integrated f&clll\y
Square feet
Units
Units
lntegraced faculty
tel £DUs per Uni.
1- 1 000 Ncn-Res.SI'

1.00 0,80
O.M
0-57

0.43 o . .i
0 .14
F'ldllt'tC-
$4,&19,lllt
154&.000
$4,490.000 I
$341,839
M.-.000
$2,400,000
St.800.000
S00.000
S300,000
$126,000
$14,000
S6.500
$33.000
S3.000
S21,000
$15,000
$30,000
S32,000
S2,232
$706
'14.736
S9,072
so.zoo
S19,S03
SS.600
I
____ _ _ _ _ S,Q.!!!.t.lm.____ _
lei l•l
lnlegra1ICIFICllll:yAl1-ad100tl l'nlpoSed Serw:.

ToNllw ........ 131 .._,_ lo l'lbl , ............. .,,. .. U h, jA.2.,,,._.eclf~Boyoncl~---Spllt--enclEldlCJng.plii,FIIC!Ji:),1111119.-1009'10-DloiMlopment histing 1~00II -·-
UC:ii1flllliJcauicia.tw.n-B111Ung Incl NIIW DMiop,nent
Exfsilng
l~a1ao m11r" .,_ •l!ftl
.,_,,, . .,. .. 13.~2
s.m
1@..!l!l!
1-~d
IN~FairlRw
o.,, _0._1!1>_
PwcolffllgedT- mu.

70.2611\
211.14"
JOO
_,,...,,,
CmtAllciclllld

10.ISll
119.22!1
- J/i(f5if:
_ i....-Fec1t111Spllt ...,..,., blstlng
11 .t:.!r!.
_Q_1 •-
Flldll\J CO!ll
~
1493,71!1
_10~~
((I)
T- Numlllrof~

4.155
589
24 136
389
26 304
s•-
Quar,tlty
- 1000 mt"'

0.18 3,557.61

2.31 0.89

0.36 0.)1 ,. ... 51 .23 18.68

7.12 0 .89

0.53 0 .53
0 .53

0.36 0.53

8.89 0.71

0.36 1.42

1.60 fel
I.._,_ Feclllly .... EDU
..,_ ec:-.~
nn:,
f~F-=tllty _,_To
NIA
J!,H_
Ill
i,__roc1111ya.p,11Eldstlng
s.ntc.s-dlrd(41 lt>J"lol l\ODD
.
1"allt lntagrattd FIICJ1111
---0.11
!>.119

1.no
191
_.,_,_,...., Tallll'N,poled
icJffl
• ~ift
345
dta
APPENDIX A-1

CITY OF LOS BANOS

FIRE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
,.1 fvollng S<atlcn
lal OOtlng
SqiiarwFeot
, .000£1
{1 1
I
T-Fllb.n
aw.
_,_ [cl
Ta-Dev91apr,a,t131 l• 1•1b i
~
C.ZSq\1119F-lleyond£mtlngSoMceStnllir<ISplllllatwan-a,d-.g,p1u1Facllf\YUnb-1001'tolttWOM,eloplMnt bl"h/1 l~ 1nr ......... -111
T.,._I
c.JCOlt--Emtlngand-Dow1opn1111&
Exl><lr,g
J@I
i ,ldot,.._
l•I
flast1ng
) Units I ,
N.-ct mu.
13,'82
.Ji&
1l!J!!)J
IOIIIINllmi.d
--14.0G2.09
Milll1

20.!!!l!!_.OO
lhl
Telalfuan
8lU'o
1 ,....._...,ubllng_Sirva-.lSpllt..._.».w_,r • .,.;,.., ~Fdlly~ .. ""'""'"' _.,, J.!9.!t' E0Us
D.3Ccllt~-l!irbtlr,gand-~-
1-·~
E"'5tw,g
New 09vete,lmMK
·-
13,111'1
~.en
18J!!)J_
IQ!el-d
-·-4,UH
nw
_ti t.•
l'ln,onlllgedT0181 ......

70.161'
21'-l!"
~!"fl'"'
10291'
29,101
10'!
l<:i UnltsAII-IOO!I
To - OoMlc,p,a,tlJJ •111
.lei'(!
.,_.,.....,.,_
~<IT""'1 mus
l0.26'(
211-14
100.~
....,_.d
r- ~~

31.JJ?a.
i:,r.
[Cl]
l'nlpolodSlr,Jce ~,..
~
)_;,~'1,§1
SQ,,nf'wtSpllt
- --Exlllt1nll l.f __ ,u z09
_ iif -H
-~
F9dl!\lCall
li3l2,82II
l!MMf'
u.,,.
ltl(
Pn,poMClsennce _,_
J.!!QOE~
----. ~9t, --
• l!1
,_,._ i 1. .. ur1-,,, "'om 4/' 4 ,!_
le] __,_,,..mu
lloycr,df,o(IIJnll
_,,._ClJ,•~a
.1'.\l_(IJ
_,_Ta
~-NIA
nm
(•I Unlls per mll ....,~ d i _lF
111111a
-lOO!ITo
- HI/I\
no
Sqll-.P-8eyal,ctEadlllfl9
-~[41
t:;J~e_,_ _lJ~
,20~.QQ_
T-~FRt
-
rn Ullltllle)ald~
-S.-14) ••11 . l19Q{\
14,052-09
t;._CW7.D1
T-Unlls
~

4.06 !1.9l_
lf!)O_
Jul
T-~
NNSqunFNt l~+t
""' {JQll_
(gJ
T-1'1-.-,
NNUnlts
346
dta
E.IEqulfal
edlttng
Unlll
£DUs
fbl
TOia!,_
ll)U's
.. hf '
APPENDIX A-1

CITY OF LOS BANOS

FIRE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
!el fol
Unlls-1"°" l'nlpooeds.vtce To New Dwllcpment 131 Slandllrd ,_ . ,'1!>1 1_.000 fDU\ -- ~ ·- -----·-- -----~_,, __
!al
l.lnlbpll'B)IJ
leyondFlds_llnl!
E.2Sq.,....faet Beyond EldMfn!I SoMt&Sllndanl Spflt-n Nowolld Eldsll1111, plus Fecmijunill 11-1ociitoNewlltYlllop- ....... ,._ Exisflnv
Nwwlla!·-'- .........v
'rOll)I
UC.AIIOCllieil-EldltlngandNewDMloj,mlffl
,._.,, ......
l'J.ZII?.
. A~
,. ... . ,,
TOIIIN-or NewU-
-.....onata1 ......
10;>61'
.?!l.74,L
100,om&
l'llrcenlla1IOI
CostNI
llnllsSIIIR Unlls ---~ Allac!""' 100II, To
T' G ID NII\ . Q.40 121.Qt>
1t,r, ·r,
F-CO.
~ 11610 -t0.5~
':"lAJ!l
ll. l!,
ttgw0pel9Crffll'!t 111,lt! S10:t204
'"'"'.l\Y,;. i 4Xa! .;"A_f'!f)'_• ______ _ l3'1_~
F.1-on4 l•I Eldsllng
lnll!grll8d Facility
1 OOOEDlls g_,
(b}
TOIIIFwn
EDU'•
.ll'
(cl
Cost~~IOOII,
ToNew-.,-13] i,,rn,_
!!.fl'"
~
{<11
Sorl,loa
StandlRI ..... 1,ID>ffllh
Oh_
(<,J
Colt Al-por l!DU lleyol,dExlstlng Jc:H- la
f.21~ facl~ ~ !xl!llngStnlce-111111 Spttt-....nNow- Elll!Ung, pkl•Fecllty Units llllotad IOOll,to NewDMI~ lzWlr\g
--....... , -
iF.3Cost--EiiitingrifNtw~
£Ai!\t1rlfJ
[!j_ew t)Qy!'l_~""!fll
h ... ,
Facllhl'w.
'flre""llllles
~!YI~- ~ --.S
Total
~
undUae Typt
'
Sl"91e Fomlly MulUfemlly
AgeRestrletcd
Retail
Olf!Cl!
lnstitutlonal
11,,.,.,.ll'lfil
..

Totzl1 AJlocel6d to New Oovolopmcnt
!Q_utside F'undtn! 1 Res :<lf191b~
ITOtal ~ (!!'..fire fe~lll!les
-or EOUs
13,282
562> 18JX'l.l
Tollll Numbll' ot 1---r-a.-.
(t 1 ~
m
100
""""'"'8ge orTCltal EllUs
702611;
29,74'11,
t()o;~
~ot
10711%
J!!!,1_~
TDNaw Cost--
S\1,815,405
•7QZ!'846
,,__ faclltly Spill _____ iltbllng
t .~
-. n,
•.
!-Cmt
ss·1.sos
~~~~
TCltal Futm9 l'N 9,
t.,u.:;i

5.622
JmgrnldFICIII\Y
~l-10!$To
NIA

0.85 Costper
EDU
S2,101.73
,, .,,..,n
£00s poflJnlil--- ,_ par un111 Nu-erunaii' ciist Flnanciod b't I.OOO~SF _____ 1.COO~SF IOOONGn-Rm. SF DIF 1,00 Sl.251.77 4,155 15,225,927

0.80 Sl,006.21 736 1740,867

0.54 1680.84 •• S29,957

0.5) S71668 238 $170.610

0.43 ss:n.s1 910 89.297

0.21 1268.15 120 '32,191
-----_ o. 4 $179,17 2132 S7~~~-=:~ I
lll!hlR JlOJ~l}.QJ1
1n u,,a,,~~
-St.lndeNSl4l ··~ /1000
T.- unlla ·-~ 1-16.70
111.30
••• m
m CostAlloc:al,od9-td!Jdotlng
ServlatS--[4]
lb •jel 11000 ,.

T-1~~
011
08'

1.m
IOI -~ Newl/l,lts
T_,,,_.., l~J
Nawlnt11gr.oflldll!I,
~
347
dta
... ,
tfldltt'l,I r..- Quon,"'-
Prtr."18ryStatior. 0
Anim&l Sl"!eller 2,600
~anqe FecilitV 2
Fleet Vehicles 50
Firearms Stock 250
IPnliNf F~ ilkies
I
lei Number af Unit,,
LandUseT:t!!! I Nan-Res. 1,000 SF
Single Family 9,758
Multifamily 1,753
Age R~lrlclCd 239
Ret!lil 555
Office 2.123
!nsUtutional 279
11ngustrld 4.~7J
T-1
Faellltv T- ,.._ Primary Stetloo 0
A'limal Shcltar 2.600
RangP. F;,c:ility 2
Fleet Vehicles 50
Firearms Stoc:k 250
PoHce fM;nitlcs
" •1•a-:, • r " •
rel Number af Unllll LandlJ5eTu- /Non-Rtls.1 ..,.., Sf
Slr'!lJe Family 4,155
Multlfnmll¥ 736
Ace RAs:trictoo 44
Retail 238
Offlca 913
Institutional 120
Industrial 2132
aml
a f ....__. • " -~· '
Fecll•• T""" ~-,.1,,,, Primar, StoUOO'I 111 42,000
Animal Shelter 12,943
Ra~ef"acilitv vs Fleet Vohiclff'S ,o Firearms SL<.,ck • 250 ~ ·~•1•
Total Cm< al-•-•---
APPENDIX A-2

CITY OF LOS BANOS

POLICE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Facltlt• Unlts
Squm-t! Foot
SQuarc FC!l!l
Aw :s
Units
Units
it,.I lei """""'•5'!MldJ>tl'"Unlt EDU.per Unit /1.Q!!!!Non-Re>.SF / Per 1.000 Non-Ras. SF ·

3.51 1.00

2.81 0.80
1,9() 0.54

2.00 0.57

1.50 0.43
0,75 0,21

0.50 21•
Quanlltv
FeelUIY Units _, _,~.,. .. Souare Feet 0.00
SQuaro Feet 195.76
Acres 0.17
Units 3.76
Units 18,82
lb] fcl EmPI_.,.,. EDUs per Unit
N<in-Ras.1.000SF l-1.000Non-RM.Sf 3.51 1.00
:!.81 o.ao 1,\:1() 0.54

2.()(1 0,57
uo 0.43

0.15 0.21 o,sn 0,14
FICll""Untt,, Fecll••Cost Square reet $34.ll"J.000
Sctuare Feet S12,S00,000
Acros $500,000
Units $1,745,732
Unit,-; $150,3.15
,..p~v,;0&1
luJ Total
NumMrafEDUs
er•.e1 9.75B

1.40';!
129
316
907
60 708 u2e2
, .., Total Number ot EDU,
leJ•!cl
4,155
589
24 1.!6
389
26 JOI sa~
Quantity
oo, IMl'I EDUI

1.4709!!
2,302.31

0.40 8,89
•U ◄ 7
348
dta
A.1 l'\>lmarv - Ill
(8)
l'Jdsll1151 SCluar9 Feet - 1,000EOUs
_!LOI!
lbf TOIIIIFlllln
EOUs
,.,.,
APPENDIX A-2

CITY OF LOS BANOS

POLICE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
(,;) Id! s.i-..r-~1111$ ,,__,Serw:e To New Dewl0PQ111flt Sten<l11'd PIii' l
8rl!?I l,OODEOUI 0,00 7 Ufl'",..
!AZSiiuore rwl!lm,nd Er1s11nA SIM0t5amdard ~ltBiiwiin-New end £xlstln!l. p1,.._ fadlRY UnlU alklc8!ad 1001' ID NM~ NumbWof .,._...ofT- Elllls EDlh
' fxi,nl"9 13,282 /0.281,
oawr unttnt !) • ., 29:W.t.
.IQcljll ]8 ~ 1\!Q.!m
,A.3COStAnocned-EldstlnqandN,ow oav.lopment
IDowtoo..- Total-of -...or 59'!!!! ,_ CootAll<lc-
'£xls!intj ,9,509.40 10.28'1l
Naw °"""'Sl.!!!!!!I 12,400.00 29.mr. ttdJ\~ ·,t} ~ 1fl1 1iX1~1:-

11.lAnlmll•I lb) feJ
Eldstlll!I T0181Futurw Allocaleel 1001' SQ,aef-por EDU's ToNewDenloi,ment l,!!!!!!El>ll's 1•1:1
!!1
]9~16 1-..:./ 1100.52
a.z SQuare Feet Beyond Elds!IIIQ Sentcii Standard S..lit88lW8911-Nevi arid Ei1si1nA. plus FecllltY Unl\S anocatliif Iota toNliw Dwelol>ment Pm!!- Existing
[New Df:v!!!:9 roonL Total
Eldsdn!j
New Oevci
lent
Number of fnlk
13,282
,Ml.2
1i.

TolalNumberot
-"• 8,320,59
11100.sz
o.an 1n
~ofTolal
.EI!!II.
m.z• 29.7(~
~
SqiareF,,etSpllt
~NlwllldEldslln!I °""'-'-
Zll,51111.40
12<
"Z°'-1~
facll!!:X Coot
$24,450,644
! 10,349,356
l.!idtf1ftt.-t>r,
(di
Proposed Sorvtce Sllndll'd 1111' 11
0CK> EPU's
' t(), u
SQu1raF-Sc,11t
llelMei>NewandExllllncl
If_ ,-lU'Vl
,,_U..1"'i
l<>I SQuarefaetllll'EDU
8e,ond EIIRln!I
l~ .. ;"I t_. 1,1~•"t~--~-
~Faet
Allocellld 1005 To
New l>Mloe!!1'tt NIA
1).00
M ~F.-perEDU
118¥ondEldlllnQ
ldl-18 1 2,1011.5$
~!'flt
Alloc:a1ed 100!l To ...... NIA

1.l_ll!!,_U
m
Square FeMBevoncl Eids!lnJI
$en1C8Slandafd
bl'l•I 111100
-~2.000.00
TOl81 5quera,-
Nloca1ad
29,509.40
12490.60
~zooo.oo
Ill
Square ,_ Beyond
!ltbU!lp SINtce lbndarcl
l!!J'ie'/ 1000
>1RjZ.4K
Total $Quant FMt
AlB.320.~9 1,1ao.s2
o.•21.10
,J
TOlal"'-<!
NtwSca181'9FNt ,,n1 i2otn~--
(Qf
T01811'r--,
llllw~r.t
t•l•l'I W M300
349
dta
1"-1 ...,,.,.,dl tY
f•I
b!Ml!IQ
lt/00~
--_a.
1 T_I.......,.

EDU'•
APPENDIX A-2

CITY OF LOS BANOS

POLICE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
lei -All-100II
ToNM~
..1L!_
,._
fdl
Fro_..iSOn,a
Stanclanl - 1.000£0\1'1 2;1ii
i"-"_........,~~'keSlll-.r,..,,._H __ E.>-J"'lnA.p(U1Y-,..._1Dla110..-~ lld!llnQ
NowOcvek>\WMnf
otal
C.3CoetAl,__, ~--Oovel~ hhllnA
u. ..... ne,,-1#1 ·,mont
1018!
D,1 FINt Vlhldu
IHI
£ldot11111
1,0Q0
--£0U's
.J..lh
-"' £DUI

13.,ill
~Gn
s~,
TOllll-ot
-
O,B1

1.34 2,? ,
., T-FIIIIN EOV'a
,.,,,._ofT«al
mus
70,2fl'l(,

29.14'!1,
l(Xl.,._
~al
Cmt- 40.~Z'll

59.•~
t,,1 UnlllAlloceted~
T0New- JM• _1_tl

1.Ll§.

0.2 FacllltY Unlls h-/Drid EiibtfuiiServ!O-Sillft - NdW w,d -,q, plus fadlllVUnlls .-100II ID New Fxistlnq
NewOevclQr~t [!'Q!lll_ -
j).3 COSt-BetwienEldllfnR-aiid .,...Oftel0Dffl911t
EdstinQ
~owf>9vek:.'f't:'I~
~··
~of
EOUS
11282
&,r.n
Total~of ~
7().26
,'11,7'
To
...,,._ofTollll
EDUI

70.2~ 29.rn,
~of
C..AI_-
~21f,
!,9.48'!1,
~
-SPIit- NM
--.. ----.. ,.
.,
Facll""Coll $;,()2,lll]j\
S21fl •. ",t,!,
l ~1 1l ,-,r ()
),jJ
~s.w:e
--lmlllW, -'""
Facllltv Unlls SOlll -MW-~ --- I
~
Fedftl-.i t"..na
"7fone, ~
ll..ll~
fol ,___EDU
Brtancl£lllltln!I
,gcl_
--10IIIITO
NM HJ/.
lei
llnllli,erEDU
lle'IOIICIE'Jdolllnll
!!!l:l!l.
•
Fadllty Unb Allooatocl 1005 To -~-NIA

21.15 I" "'1rw8-ld Emllnq$11V11;esi,,!Olrd b •.~/1000
no
TOllllAlnl AJ--
UM18-ld '"
&lltln!! Service~
1>1•,-111000 ,'h t

0.91 ,.,.
1~!}
T-Fecllltf llnlls Al20.26
~1•
(Qj
T..-.IPrOO(INd
New FacllltV Acres
'
lql T"'81Pl_.i
New fedllty UnKs
~lilll
5o.OO
350
dta
E.1 l'1nlemll5'oek
l•l ~II
flNllrmsS!oeki,er
.!iJ!!!2.LDU's .!J!!OC'
lb)
ToUtlftllln EDU's
_ ...

APPENDIX A-2

CITY OF LOS BANOS

POLICE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
lei
lmlllAl-1005
To---,_llltt
...:!lllll
JII'"'-
[di ,..,._~ ~- 1.000(Dth ... ,
. E,2 FticllltV lJnlll 88'/l>lld Exlilln!I ServlceStandlli'II Slitit S-,, NM~an~ Et lstlh!I, plus fecllltY Unl1181ioctted 100!!, to -o.wiooment E>dlllog
NWNDAwlfQ1m&nt
Total
_.,...,, EOUs

13.Zffl
5,Gn
!!!_$1(),1
1UCost.Allocebld B«ween Existliiil IUldNer< ~
ExtsUnq
NewOP..mll')iimenl
otBI
Fa_c:\ll tyf.-
Police faclOtlos
!Lry 'I I f!<W8n,""'
lim!!!
1~fa
Slnqle F, V
Multtfamily
Aqe Restricted
Retail
Ofl1ce
lnstltutlonsl
pmonl
NGll9:

Total Number of
~Unltl 10130

8.10 , ¥.,go
1'1t1 or P!!' 1,(JCIONo,,.._ '5f,~-•-~
,.,_dTCJ181 EQUs

70.26%

29.74'!1,
1mJ
"'"'8nUl1111or
,..,_...,_ O.S211,
S0. ~
Cost AIIOC818d totlawD-- $13,234.flll0
El>Ul11WUnl1/

1.ClOO Non•Re!I. 5.1'.

1.00 0 .80

0.54 0.57
0 .43

0.21 0.14
111 A5..~MOS OfT~ tinA Revenuos will 00 applied to pnv dAhl ~ce on the proposed Prlmnrv ~talio n. lnctucres Measure P ._.. Feclllly __ llnlls 1-,,i Sllllc
1(•1 .~ .... 'µij""
fll!l!lltr "-
l80.917
i ~Q 41 1\
~
T- ,-.__gi_trs 5.622
•=
,_.,..Unit/
1 ODO Non-R<li.. S.f.
$2,Jt,4,19
$1,883.35
$1.274.35
$1,34U2
$1,006.01
S50lm
'335.36
(o)
Unlll-EDU
s.,onoEldlllnQ
[qi-Jal
flldlRYUnlta Allocatllcl 1005 To
- NIA 105.ll>
Costpor
J!)\/_ $Z,3SU9
---:ii
Numt>tr or 1/nns/
1 Non-""9.S.F. 4.155
736
44 230
910
120
21 2
m
Unba.,,a,,a
"-bU11!1 SeNlta !ltMiclan:1 'bl•r--111000 ._. .. 1"
TOIIII Fectflly Uftlll
-
Cost Finan- by
Dlf
$9,781 ,506
Sl ,366,701
$56,071
$319,336
$915,831
$60.252
$714 991
$13.234.688
46137
II
101 30 1:4_B.7Q
lgl -r-,~
NM FadlltVUnllS
1•1 •rt
351
dta
APPENDIX A-3

CITY OF LOS BANOS

PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Facill<·.

Communlt"/ PNk~
l\'el~hbomood Pnrks
l~te_ori<S
·-· LandU~ 1\,·,e
Si~leFM1ilV
Mult1-ram11v
A ,e Re,nctea
Total
Land Use _T..L.!,e
SinQleFamilv
Multi-family
A•·1e Rest;rlcted
To~f
Fiu:it1t.:r. lJoits
Acres
Acres
Acr~
Number or Residents

34.251
~.922
454
39,677
Fac111tv Unite.

Acres
Acres
~rQ!;
Numbot ..,r Rf!:-Jcietnts
H.5fW

2.068
!l4
~735

88.71 !l0.R4

11.38 Number or Unitn 111
9,7S8

1.753
/1.Q
i 1.i'i0
Qu11ntil

88.71 R0.94

11._:i_e
Nurntier of Ur:iL-; f11 4.l~!i
ni;
44 ,t .::a
Re1icienls 1 ~•r Untt 121

3.51 2.81

1.90 NA
I ,lC'.11 ly tlnits
er 1,000 Residents

2.24 2.29
00~
~esldt'Hll:5 M~r Unit t2)

3.51 2.81

1.90 NA
EOUs 1 , r Unit

1.0()

0.80 0.54
NA
E_Q_UsJ~Ur Unit

1.00 0 .80

0.54 NA
Fl!Oht.cfue l3l fncllil llnih
Facility Units
_f J!r 1,000 Resideots Funded h~ New Develo_ me__m
Community Parks
\
Nef!lhbofhood Pnrk.<
llnrlr,at Par1c"-
Aero,
Acres
Acr~

2.24 2.29

0.29 31,46

38.4()
4&_1
F;w:.ll!tv Unil!ii Acres Be_ifli ! A,·rt+11t'n Land Ar. oi~i110,~ ·er Acre ISJ Ac.fA~ BPir\.; tkMtl<l 1'd Commuiiltv Prukc;
NeiQhl:>Orhood Porks
P0Cke~ Park~
Total
,._ • I
Facilll'. T· -c
..

Recreotionnl PMI Focm
Skate Par~
T-••
Mllta'S:

Acres
Ac.Tes
AcrP.~
... . .

F•clllt, UnllS
lnt"9rot8d Facility
!nt~rm.ed FHCilllV

37.46 $0

38.40 so 4.81 $0
.

Current Dcvclol ,mnnf Fi.i11R.- D0Vt?k11 rncm 0 1 1 2
(1) l'apul8t1on estimates tased on C11tlrnrnia Dept. oFFlnar'!Cc. UOmOQraphlc Rese&rch 11r1i1 • ReP<Yt E-5 May 1, 2017. (2) Residflnts per Unit based on Am«iean Community Survey (ACS) 2015; data comes from I he U.S. Census Bureau. (3) Estimatas hn!M on curnmt Par1<s lnvontory os identlf"aed within the Los Banos Gcnernl Pinn. 1/Af,
J[l.40

4.81 t\, iilrtout ro 1-ulM.1on
56,'.Jo?
'\6.:IG2
' ' Numcer or EOUs
9,758

1.402
129
11 290
rotal Number or EDUs
4,150
589
_?_4
Ve~
~le Oeveto1mc~t [ ArAr.rti I!]
$4(11,).2,..,J
S369.J'l2
i~i 1(~i
• ac1lllv Uni1s ,_., 1.000 Resklf.ms
Q.(li

0.04 (4] E5;timales bae-...ed on cost sssumpllor,~ fur park improvement costs tn other areas of the Central Valley as ldAntified L>v Goodwin Consultlnfl Gm1p Fee Study. [SJ !n liQtit of the City's Ouimbv F~. lwld Acquisition Cost.shove bean excluded from this ana:vsis. (6) Park development costs have boon ascnlnted accordinq to the Construction Cost lndP.a (CCI) for F!scal Years 2000-2011. [7] Ptanntnc:i and Oes}nn Costs hnv~ been estimated to be apprnximatetv 6% of <1evo10pmont c.ost!'i, as seen in other Ca Hf ornia communities. [8] AdmintStrationcosts have beP.n f'-.timated at 5% to appropriately reflect City Storrs t·•me.

Ptonnenil and Oc51-.;n (tier N:.re;.
$23,841.33
$23,118.8'/
S1 321.08
Facilities Funded
b New Develo~iment

29.69'6

59.38%
Facillt· Co!W
$12,000,000
S1.500,000
$11500•~·
Total Facillty CoSl
for N~_Peve-101 ,mP.nt
$16.R74,'31
Total r :v.,,n,a~ fOf' New Oeveli":r,11lent
$3,563.0l0.30
S890.155.08
S730017
lf!ll'l!S LOS ,od facllttlM ,_ TOIi!!
Cost 1.er£0U
,1,r; 11
•rim,a.l
115500
Sl~(t27,84 l
352
dta
ratiiii:ill?! Surface WatcrTreatmcn\ fl!nt (Incl. Chromium GT, Groundwater SvsteioebHity & Rachergc Project
ivalve Rophmement
Waterlines
Welll6
Wa~M«~rs
Well ffetlabllltatlon
E-qulprnonl
Storage Tanks etld Boostftl' Pumps
Groundwater Wctb
wen Man1roId S•'$tmTi
Wefflr-faciliUcs
LenclUsoT""' SlnglOFamlly
Multll'8mlly
Age Restricted
Retail
Off'ICO
lnstltuUonal
,lndu,y_tal __ ,.~-~
IT9!1!I._ .. ···-----
F.odtl\rTYl>O
SUrf8ce Wntef Tmatmnnt Ptimt (Incl. Chmmlum 6 T,
G!'Ounawatcr Sust-a!Nbllity & Recharge P'rn_JQCt
Va!VQ Rc-:,,,ecel'n<!nt
Watorl\nas
We\118
,WatDJ Meters
WeU Rehabltltatlon
Equlprnttnt
Pipelines
Storage TankS and BoO'iler Pumps
Gt'oundlt,,atc<Wcll!.

Wett Manirok:I S\" .tcm
f_~
,.

LardllseTSlngle Famll,V
Multlfumlly
Age Restrictet1
Retail
Offlc•
lnS1Rutk>rtsl
Industrial
..;;...

Faclllty T.,,.
!
'Surface Water TteMl'Mi'\t Plant (Incl. Chromium 6 T,
Groundwater Sust.1111nabllity & Rechorgo PrqJttet
Valve Repli,cemAnt
Waterlines
Wclt16
W8terMetors
1We1! Rehllbllil&tlon
Equlp<rm<
Storage T,mks ann Booster Pumps Groundw11ttw Wlltt!.

Wall MenlfOld System
I 7 ~ J211!1 ......

01.-kY
APPENDIX A-4

CITY OF LOS BANOS

WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Integrated ~ FftQlky
liitagroted Facility
ltttegtHIP.d Fflc!Uty
lntp,,grat4-':d Facility
lrnegratoo f'tteillty
lntAgratod Fac!llty
Integrated Facility
lntCQrnfed fDC11ilY
lntowoi.d f&e!lily
lntograt.oo facility
lr,.1! :i@t~_f_~cl_fil_-·
l•I l•J (bl (cl TOW Numa-olUnlls ,.,..,,._per Unit EOUsporUnft NL111 .... cfEOIJ•1 TOIIIEStfmalildwtthln /Non-Res. 1,000SF /1.000NOl'Hloo.Sf /PurUOONan--.SF i• ·•1cl ~ vt'"11uence !SOlltll

9. 758 3.51 1.00 9.758 23.224

1.753 2.81 0.80 1.40:! 3.338
239 1.00 o.s. 129 308
555 2.00 0.57 316 359
2,123 1.50 0.0 907 2.091
279 0.75 0.21 60 95
____ 4.973 ------ _ Q.}0 0.11 ··- 1® - - ---------,.cM3J! ----- __ 1J282 _ --- :111.ffl ,.._
tel Numblratllnft>
llllOONon-Ros.Sf 4,156
73G
44 238
910
120
213>
,,,_
Fed~
Integrated Fe,;lllty
lrttcgrated Faelllty
lntogretQd FaclUty
lntL~latetf Fav.lUty
lnt~,atod Facility
Integrated Feclllty
1ntt19mtnrt reeilfty
Integrated Factmy
lntegnlled F1mllly
lnte!gratcd Facl11ty
lntograted faclllty
lntetC:.:tiJtcd ht:lllN
(Oj
-psUn!t/[mpioy.. _ ,,,,...Non-llaSf 3.51
Z.81
1,90

2.00 ,.so

0.75 ~•n
Fac11nx untts lntogmted FeclUty
!ntnorated FAclflty
Integrated facility
lntcgrotad Faclllty
lntcgmted Fuclllty
lntegratetl f1tr.ltlry
tnteg,atftd f11citity
Jnlegranxt Focllity
tntcgrat&d F11clllty
Integrated Fe<:lllty
hu~roteCS Ft,Cillty
- 1.9!)0
~
_ED_..l!'!
!cl
,- ,~~; 1.00

0.80 0.54

0.57 0.43

0.21 " 14
Facl,.zCoot
s,si.193_9,1
$230,000
$250.000
$3,212.000
$1.620.000
$3118,528
1'.SR0,000
$479.000
$23. 60.000
$11,340.000
$10.815.000
~.lll.~94_1
ldl
TD!al
N..-atmu. a •tc~
4,15!:I
589
24 136
389
211
304
51»
CIUlnlky
e!f: l,llOOEOUs o.,e

0.18 0.18
0,18

0.18 0.18
0 .18
0,18

0.18 0.18

0.18 38189
54426
T0181£odmelild-ln ""'ftlf l
13,466
1,935
179
43 11:~35 ! 7!
11,ml
353
dta
APPENDIX A-4
CllY OF LOS BANOS

WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
~ SUltlca-T.....,.Plant(ln<L ~e1.,.mQJ
J.'t)
£lrfstJng
1neeor-F11C111typw 1.IX!!!CW•
(nt ,_,_ £OO's
Ir.) ..,,...._,....,,111_1_ To_o-1_. lA'.'JJ:~_!
1,,1
Pl'q,ooad-
""'-""' 1_axJl'Olh
"
A.Zl--facltttye.v,,,,<lad9tln0--st,llt---£,oo,,g.,.._,"'""1Unb-od100llu,N.,.DM~ •!5!!% •m f.Xlstlng
Now Df'!Vf!IO ·mont ~Uli ------
,UC,,.1111--&bltlng---.-.
f.:u~v TE'x.:..th g
New Oovtnr n"Ntnl
Totel
B.1Grourldwmr~.-.~
1•1
&flllng
l~flCIIMypw 1..000EOU~ ~~1.-,
I
--of e!!
13,Zffc'
17,511
________lC~llfil___ _
, __ .,,
DA!
057
(bl
T-Fulure
EDU'I
~J;--•
""'-"'T- 41
~
.0:,!1
S~.l!MI
_____ _____!Lll.f.!.l! ___
..._.,,
c-- 0 .05% M,,85'll,
-----~---~
.,__Foolll<ys,tl\
Emll:lf'IG
---.0.:110 .WK
. .,
()1\.1
f t•j
,--cS&!i.516.688
S86,6!7.2Z3
,. "
[dJ
....-- _,,.,.

Ulnt,egr-FIOfll\Ylloyc,ndllldaUJ,gS.....-.iSpll\ ___ Eldlllng.plllSFedlli,Unllslll-100IIIONewDovolc,pmon! foclll\'t.,_
&1.ftlllQ
1/ow°'""V!"l'T'lr
~--

18.3 COICAII- - blsUng and NeWllMlopmlnt
'.C:tv-~
tel
bltclng
lflle!ltaud flelll1:y por - -- 's
i l_l~
Nuoni.of ElllJ's

11.292
S&U
TOIIII Numblr ct -· 0,10
0,30
(bl roui,.-. EllU'a
~-"1,!llillt
"""'8nlllgeofT-
~ -"-- -..o..11N>1,_ 70 21'11 •1-ro 2!1.14!1
~
~ol
Colt- Ftdl!JCell
,ca ll $l01.51!!

29. % ~ 401 11 •• , , , - ,:.~>1_11"'1
[r.J Id!
...__,acllll;JIAl-10!m
Tc,-~ ~-
-.inper 1!•1h, l!!QIOV.
ic.Z~facn11;y~-tii,ii,ig~-Spilt---~l'fl"FICl11t;ytJnttae1-10D11toN41wCJMiiijimiiit if•M.~Tf.xtstlng ~--
C.S C:-AI--Eldllll,fand- ~
,~--,--
Existing
N-QtWilo t _ _..

Total
_,,,
.H!!l!

13.262
§G22
rC11.11Numw« .,__.,.,acn ....
070
OM>
............,,,,,_ 600s
;(),lf'""'
,"J 74~
l~
-of -M.-Od I0.26'Mi
"'74%
~,"
~-lt)'Spllt a.-,_.,.,
• ..,, .... Coot
1176Al51
$74 3•9
. "'"'"'~1
,.,.._ ,.,..tty.,. cJ:1
'-"'f-ng "11•1
,,.._,ICfltty
Al......, 100!' To
--•··" H/ ,
l•J
~factlllrpor!DU
..... ~ ;,~i.a,

1...-r,e1ncy
-1UOl'To
~-..... "A'" ~
(nJ
1--f,ocllll;ypor lllU
8")'ondbbllng
tll;; '• Q..111_
~f«:111,y
AIICCllad _.,.,.._,_ lllOI'-Tc,
NIA
9-_0!1
~I ,,,... • ..i,....,~&1111,,g
--~/11'.ltll
I_'!.

TN! I,.._ facNI\Y
tllE!!! 0 0
O.t1
100
ff) ·~s::=i~ ,.,,. ~111000
t.a
,_ .....,_factltr
M-1
0 10
D.JO
- _ lJJQ
!fl
lnllQI'-fldlll,y flo)'ond-. --·- bl:J:e: /lOtX)
TOlllll~fedllty
-u.70
P..1l!.

T_.......,_ i!II
"-·~ faclllty t_t (•_:!_(,
[g}
TOllll'ropoNd
- ""'°IIIWdFIClllliY -~i'-
.-;:~
JgJ
T"""Pn,p,,s,od NM
'11':
354
dta
APPENDIX A-4

CITY OF LOS BANOS

WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
o.,_u- ---------~--· --- .,,,.~--------
1•1 ~ng
~P11cU11Ypor '!.QIO P)lla
f} t/1
lbl T«all'uan EDO's l<I ,,_,_,_.'"1Al-1005 ToNaw-- ·mo u.tn (di
Pl'apaM- -,11111 EWJ ...
t 'Jt
jii2 lftt9grllflHI FICIIIW~·r.1111ng Slr\lfce-Sp11tlllivioen Nawand fa1ltlllg. plus Far:1111,y..-,n.-100ltoNlw OMloiin,tnt Ex15tlng
INowcll~""'
~l
D.3 COStAII--Ellbtlngend Now°""910pmmt
hcllft•l-
£mttng
Nevv.Devolo, mam.
1'ut"-
E.1-16
l•I Elllttlng
t~FICllltypor -1Jl!!!!.ffll"' 1l ( K,1
_.,, IDlh
13,1B?
~J!Z2
.1~!
T--d
'-Fd ...
010
tun
'
(bl i_,_ £OU"S
~dT-l!IIU'~
I0.26'll.
2!). 14'll. ~-
!."-~ 70.26'1.

29.14'll,
1 lVl""1olllL
tel 11'1111111'_,-.;y_,_ To __ .,,._
~
0 it
.._._,.._Spilt
r.,-.,
---0.70
O.!O
I r;<;!
r-~-

17.258.'N!& -. .... "' lt: ~ '11 • '". IWI
[di
Propooed!IIMot
!Rlncllnlpor
UID ffllh
-
E.2 lnt19rllflHIFact111ylleyondl!mtlng _ _,. Splttll«Mel1Nowlftd~plus1'"""1ty unn,..--100K11>NIWDoMltctlffll"l _fad~ Tvne
Erl~
IN-°"""""'"""" Cfeuf
UCOlt--E>llsllngMld-DIM!loprnw&
,.,w--
{•I
Eldla"IJ ""°IJ"-Focllleypor IOOOEOU'I
-- ~--
_.,, Rill'~

13.282
582-2
:ro;;;
[I~
, __ EDU's
~or,._ ..,.,.

70.261'
£:'t.1411.
......,_d
~
lt!i:!._00
[cl
lntllgralld FO<IIH;y Al-100'il
ToNrN~ ~_fj_J, 1
...:.
1n1.- hldlll/f Spllt 8-Nowltld
·- 0.70
l!_-30
ldl
PropallllSomce
__....,.,

1.!ll)!l_!DU'a
l'2 t~FIClll;Jhyond---........~SiindirdSpttt.......,N•iiiioffiilllng. ptusflldlll.Yllnlll.,_ tdtoNliwOMi- ,~ lt',TEmolng """'.......,,,_
F.3caetAllociiiod...._,eii,,jj,,o ..... _~
_.,,
!DO',

13.282
S,!!22
109
~otT-ElJU't

10.?81'
2Y,Z "
<m•m
-
Cast- ~"' 70.2111'
l!l,741'
....-,.-,r,i1t
bmtrict..iomwt ---oro
O.:!O
too
'"' SZIIO.llllll
mn.320
l•l ,,,,.._ Faclffl,y per EDU ..,__,. ~I•
_gJI
• ....,_Fcllll;f
-1005To
-- ,,,.,. J'>.llll
l•J
.....,_fll<MJperliDU
81yondEll!MlnQ M W1

1....-Fectltty
Allocai.alOGaTo
- NIA
tl.m
(~]
l~FedlitJpwEOU
Bo:/<>ndfldltlnD ff tll
~Fc!IIIJ -10laTo
-~ ....

WA
C.!!!
(fl
..,.._FIICITM;Y~ fldlllng S..iceStlncllNI b)•lol /1000
~--
T-1.....-l'eclffl:y N0.70
.!b19
!.00
It; ,....-,ldllly~Exlstk'IO
--lbl' lttl /1000
--~
Tocal I~ Fect!IIY
-0,10
l!:!!.

LOO
~l
l~hcllll;yllolyondflmtnl
s---
lh_ ' J!'.., (190()
,.co
T-~l'edll\Y
M•!!!!!! 0.70

0.30 ,.oo
tgl
T-l'l'a()OMd -I~ Fa,;Ulf ·ru- 111
-;~:r
lg, Talal~
-ltllllgreCIMIF.clll,y
~ •if
(g]
TOIIIIPr.-
NIWlm,ogr-FICl111)! 1chtt
c~
355
dta
IG.IW.M
I ,., -"11
~Flldlltyp,r . 1.(lOO fOU's
t~
IOI Tollllflllln
IOU'•
APPENDIXA-4

CITY OF LOS BANOS

WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
,., i...-FIClll1;y-101a
To-0-lapmant ~
11;LJQ
toJ PropooodSllndonfpw
1 OOOEOll'I
tl11-!
lo)
i......-Feclll;ypor EDU
loyondf--.i ~ I
_!!·1•
'G.21--Fodtl\)'lloyondfif.,u"'II--Spllt-llowand~puFedl!lyUnlto-1005IO-DMlop,nor'lt roc~
bbtlog
~
New DM!!ilOI ~_I,
;G.JCeltAI---.V---...-
,_,,.,T_ Existing
-~ -Q~lo l"'__.s!!!
!CUii
iH.) Equipment
f•I
Exlsllng ......,_ FIICl1ly per 1.000EDllt ltl'f
_.,, Ell\l'I
"'
, __ of
J- Ftldl•z
0 .70 n,n
lbl T-Fwn EDth
•:_U __
~Fsa,,Spllt i,__,-.y ~.,,,._ -""'""' -100!lTo EOtl•
__ , __ __ ,_ 70.1M<, " ·•~
ZVili 'I non ,l.,,o
~.,,
Colt:N'.cc:lad f-,.5z C01t I0,2U S1i~
l'!l.l •l< MD1!!1 ,,,i:,,1 - ll ~...QQ!l)
tel (d] lo)
..._.. facllft;yAllocalBcl 1- Pr...-,ISomao l~FIOllll,yporEDU ToNMDowlupment -por lleyondr-.it
1 1!il" !~ JgtDU's td, ta,
--~---~ !IJ;:_______ ~IJf
jli.2,,__Fllcilt,;ylloJonilbiili,gSom:eSlloidards,atBotwNn_...,t>dltlng.p1uoF1a1111YUnllla-100IIIO---- !_,_
Effltlrog
tfe/il~'Ok)/"1lf!flt
Tciii
IUC<l«Al--Exlltlng-Newllwllopmo!lt
~•MI- Exlstfng
Mow ~Qri:!!1_~t_
'i_oiai"
'J.1 S\,,n,go T.-llld-Pumps
l•l
~
flobllng
~
Factfl\J per
o.n
~"' mu,,

1.f.2112
s.~
,_,._.,,
l~.f~l!Y

0.70 .!!,10
p,J
TOCIIRaan EDU',

11..il
.......... olTCllal IDlh
lG.211!1
U.l ll
.._._.or 70.2""
J_f)!_1J!J(
~ "\_
~~-1-lei
To _ _.,,.,_
1(•1_b!
i...-.Fc111\YSpllt _,. __ -- , ; ll_~
~
''°""
~---r.n. llla.148
..!!!li.~~
t,411•
(d)
Pnlpmod- _,..
1000EOU',
.....-,acny
~ IOO!I To
,.,,. .()._QO
(•I
J~potSIU ..,...~ ~
.l.21.....,_Faclll\l'lloyor,0£-..,--.SSpllt---~plutFecll~llnlll-lOOl,to-~ ~flClllly~ ,.,.._Foctllty -.or ~GIT- ._._..., AIIOcltedl00!5To I~
'-1andEx-.v
S..lco-ll
~•l! JID:!
t1'J
T-1.....,..iFoc1111), MC 111d

0.10 o,io
, oo
(ij
lleyond£ariltlr,g
--lb•1 llOOD
Totaltlllllgn!Aldbclllll,
-a.10
!U!!.

1.llO
Ill lrMgradf~lloyot,dE-.i
--)!t_"_:_'!.J...! 1QOO
~'mo ~1 :,:: ~OM!w,m O!w,P.,-,p<":'.'.~ ~ I ~
'J.3CfflAl---.and-~
facl!II'
Exl'lt1rlg
~~[)evcJo ment
_!!!JI'

5.622~~ _ -~~~ 29,7'4
~ :,_ 'I ii" '.!_
~"' co._ f!l't.lttty<VSII m .•Bl.101 .l!,J!l§c••r ~~19' ,,_,, ,._...._., ,._,..,._F ... lty
c,. t,
lgl
Tota!Pr..,_ _,.....,_r~ 1r1•!••
(gl
_TOlolPN,poooO .,,__PKl!ly Ch.!.•1
356
dta
APPENDIX A-4

CITY OF LOS BANOS

WATER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Uc;_,.·w111~ - ~ -,, - --
1•1
edsllng
l~'!dlkypor
:- ·v-,;:
... _,_ lb]
EDl11
(cl
~fldlft;y-10CIII
To New DIIVtllopmont nrll~
Id]
Pnlpmed- s.._,,..

Ul00EllU'• lf jl_
IC.21~ FttHl\)'Bayand £Jibllng SerlleeSlan<lard Spilt-,_...., Elllstfr19. plus Foclll\)'llnltl •II-100!l110NewOmllopn,ent ._., ... ,_
=--~~-~ T""'I
tUc:oitAIIOIIIIICl-b!RllltlandNM-.,,._
.
~
EJdr«llig - NRWDINIW\o rnront
iT_otil
L1-Menltbkl~
l•I
Elclollng
frllagt-Fodll\Ypet
1-®!)EDU's
1'V
N-c,f
EDU'a
13,?.87
~.677
1 3
f-.Numbaraf lnteGINl.ectfadllN

0.10 9-.M!
lhl ,.,.,,, ......

EDtr•
-.i.seon0181 .....

70.?6'1r.
711.74,i;
~ '1\""t:!:t':
~d

70.?G'lro ~74'1t
.:t!!._(_, ....
!cl 1,_-hcllltl,Al-100II T•--k,pmont J•J.:l!l.

HX\.

H•--
~Faclll\Ys,,tlt ~--010
o.ao
•=
•-co,,
$7,967.!>.'18
S3,l12 ... ti2
-~11_un_nc.-.
[di ,,,.,.__ _,,..

1.D00£DU'a ·Htil
ru ,,,__l'ecltltyee,a..tEJCbtlngS.0-....Stelldlnl!lpfft___, Newond l!altung.pllllPldlltyO_lf_ 10C'l511> NIW Dilw!opmol1t '""ttll!J.IPO
E,1,u,,g
N-r;t,,,,olpc !!"<'t
l~
LSCootAIIOclltd ..-, ElClllfnil 1114 l'okw DMloonWII
lklli!Y J. jOl'iffl'ltt
N9W Oawiopl'n&f\t
:O~t
1Weter
~ Facilit__iffl
Surface Water T,ea1ment Plaint "1
ITNal
~of
~
13,282

5.&2J.

TatalN-of
~ dTollll
Il!!tL.

70.26'f
Im
~
......_d
IDNIWCOR- - tet K
SIS,870.358.79
S86.677,2Zl.03
$94,458.084
.... ao.-.Newlfld --1\Y-0.70
JY2
!.®.

Toall
[utun>{l!!!
5,622

17.571
~GH
~ ---~ ·--- EOIIS""'Unlt/ Flldl--M'UnlC/
l•I •--F-,,por £DU BeyomlElll-.,g ~~
.__~
-IOOIITo
- "(ti,
Oil>
l•t l~FeoltllJpwtD\I
Bayand-.
lsJ:l!L
---=-.J:t
,....-,~
-100IITo
- NIA ,,.,.,
CD:,tpor
EDU
SZ.823.03
$4,912.91
H,ll~@l.
--- _.,,._ --- SWTPr•-Unltl
01 C.....-ftldlll;Jllvyondbllllng
-S!llndll'd h.'ioll1000
Total l,,.._FICIIIIJ
-o.JO "'"' IM
!~ .__, ... Mr.,.,.,...£lobtll,g Serllcab""l• H 1000
.1~t
Yollll~F~
-0.10
..!!.!!
l.llO
191
T-l'lopoMd
New~Fat1!11 ~J_'!!f
;l(f
191
TOllll'Nlpoood
NIWl~Fec:111\)' ..l-thlll
lfuml>OrctUIIIISl-~m'm'!NumllerotUnit.,/ Cc>!tFl!lllllaldllv

1.an,111._T_ 1 .IWIN~I..J:_ 1 .00DNlw_ __ __ _ , ,,.. ........ - .. -- . -• ••-"'' ••---•• _., ·r--·---1:, • 1--- . • 141111._§.fi 1000 1!!!!!·~.S.F. S!r,q!c Famflv 1.00 $1,384.1 16 SHJ2,91 Multlfamltv 0.80 $1.107,; !5 Sl,9'16.33 IAo• RestrlC!Cd 0.54 S749. !1 $2,670.2-4
" Retall 0,$7 5788,I $2.810,77 ----· __ _
Orl'ic:e 0.4-3 $5.91.4 8 12,109.08
lnstltutk>r\111 0.21 SZ9S. ,, $1,05-4.04
6 $702.69 lat 0.14 $197. ---·-···- TOlal Alloct1led to New- Oevalopmcnt S.94.4SS.08-t j Outslde f' UfJCi h''llf qqnr:'Slb I · .l)Ut . 'l§l____} .S7 cr~~.f""'- OQ7.468~ N- (11 The Sw f8c:e W:rt~ Treatment Pbml is oxpac1eo to service the entire SOI. total futUtc U"..t!t, assu~tion nas ~ ad lusted to uirkld cmvek:oment estimates contained within the We tor Mastar Plian. 357
dta
I.and~'!'.- Single Fnmily
Multifamity
Age Restrlcted
Retail
1 Qlflce
l
lnstitutiontt<
tnch.1'1lfiOI
ITOOII
FacllltYT
Wastewater (t'ICilitr Rep:accmcnt
!:f,1.1•
k'l!!<I_IJ,.,T<rw Single Famny
Multifn.mlly
AgeR~ricled
Retail
l
on,co lnstit1Jtional
lndustrlJ!l
It ®'!.
tfaclllr;y T•
Wastcv,atct •xmry Rti:plocenu~m
Olrs.ttlr,qRew!nues
]'~I CC5t Of FacNlllM
APPENDIX A-5

CITY OF LOS BANOS

SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
i•I
Numl>!lr0f1Jnlt,
/ Non-Res. 1,000 Sf

9.758

1.753
239
55~
~.123
279
4,.973
y 1.00
l•l Number ot U'11ts I Non•Rei~_ 1.Q2!)_ Sf
4,1M;
nr,
,.,
nn
910
~,o
1,1_g
1nt:
fllClllty Unlts lnt~ ed Facllit
ib)
~-per Unit/ ,,...,,..Se.v,,ct I!!! l ,000 Non-Rm, SF

3., ;
?.A1

1.90 2.00

1.50 0 .10

0.50 Fecf11t., Units
lnt81 rntftd Facilit;
fb}
Residents per Unit/ l'e,son, Served -1!!'!_ 1,000 Non-Res. SF

3.51 2.81

1.90 2.00

1.50 0.)5
o.so
taclllry Units
lritegrated FecitiLy
fr.)
EDU.per Unit
/ l 1000 Non-Res. Sf
1()()
0 .80

0.54 0.5)

0.43 0.21

0.14 Quanaty
I!!! 1,2!!2 EO\Js

0.08 [el
F.DUsperUnlt I UIOO Non-lies. Sf

1.00 o.r10
0 5<
051
043

0.21 Q14
Faclll!v Coot
ldl Total
Number or ED Us
.a •1r. 9.758
2 129
31 6
907
60 708
13Jl!Z
Id)
Totbl
Number of EDUs
a'•i,
4,155
589
24 130
389
26 Jg_4
Sl!_ZZ
QuantltV
JOOOEDUs 0.16
358
dta
fA-1 W-Facll!tJAl,pt--,t (al
Existing
ll'IIBgrated Faclnty
'.<XXI EDU'II l'I,_~
APPENDIX A-5

CITY OF LOS BANOS

SEWER DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
lb)
T-IFuture
EDU's
~,sn
lr.J
lnlligl'Nd Faclllty- 1oo,i,
ToNaw°""8loplnent
{nt•lb

0.4?
[d]
~Sa'vlce
Slllndard per
L!XIOEOU'1 _121'
A.2. liillli,'9tad Faclllty lleJOnd E:ldlilngSllrvtca SUndlllll Splll 88lwwn "--~plus Feclllty Units •-100!510 Naw ~ NumllerOf
: FaclHtv T.,,,. EDU's
Extsting 13,?87
N.ew Oeve10..,ment h.622
l'otlll 18 ll0:l
A.3 00!tAI-.J·a.-,Erlsllng end NM DIMllcpn,.-
F1lclltN T...,. 1 Total Nu=:

FKlst;ng ll,41
New Develollme,t 0,58
Too,I l,()()

71._lll!"•::--. 111.•
Faclll\Y T,..,.

Wastewater Facl!lty Replacement
!Total
II Cktvo1oi:;,.,,ri, lmpac\ Fee per Uri1\ <JI ll'!1f 1 000 Non R9\ ~ t LandUseT
Si119leFamllv
Multifamily
/\~e Restricted
Re1'1il
Office
:nstltutlonal
Industrial
Total A11oc8ted to New Development
OutsidA Fundint. Re""',onsibillt•
Total Cost ofWIISUO WIii IICIII
Pw-,,ageOfTOl81
EOU's
70,2fili
29,i4%
lOU~
~Of Al- 4052%
~9.4891
100,00%
Cll5t Alloca11911 ta New
$33,011.649
J.&2
EOU.parUnlt/

1.0DONoo-Res. S.f.

1.00 0,80

0.54 0.57

0.43 o.;,1
0,14
lnl8grlltad F~ Split
~Newand b !Stlna -
-
o.•1

0.\7 ·1~K
F.Cll""CM
$22.489,651
S33011,649
$55 501300.

Total
FutuniEDU'I
5,622
5622
!'ea per Unit/

1.000 Non-Res. S.F.
$4,847:02
$3.817,62
$2,623.74
$2,761.84
$2,071,38
$1,035,1;9
$690,46
!el
llllllgnltad fecllllJ per EDU
81,yondE,utJng
tdl•IA'
--
·;.17
fntegns1lld FadlftiY
AIIOCelleCI 100!5 To
New-
-
NIA
O. il
Couper
{DU
$5,8)2,13
_f'_fl!Jm.

NumbarofUnllsf

1.000 Non-Res. 5.f.
4,155
736
44 238
910
120
2132
[I]
fntegns1lld Faclllty BeyonclE)dstlng
Service St.enclllnl 'hl' !e],/ 10!JQ
OSII
TOlill~~
0,41

0.59 1.00
-
Cost fll1onced 1W
DIF
S20. 139.04?
$2,855,065
$115,445
$657,477
S1,885.59fi
$124.052
11472, 7 $27,248,762
$22.489-651
149738413
[gJ
Total Proposed
New lnllllgrlltad Facll11;y ig +m
1/_!l
359
dta
,._. ..

LendUseTSingle family
Multifem11y
Age Restricted
Retail
omcc
lnstltutlonnl
lndustria\
Total
I
_I.and use T,,.,,.

Single Femlly
Multlfamity
Age RestrlCIP.d
Retail
Offlce
lnstltultomii
I~
...

Fac1n,,,r- Sto, m Or ,i'1 n Fttellit1es
..... ' .,._ ..
.
ocemant
..

Total COSt ol Starm Drain Facnttta,
• .... 1~,
APPENDIX A-6

CITY OF LOS BANOS

STORM DRAINAGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Qu.,m
---,
[a)
Num-orunns /Non-Rm.1.000SF
9,758
1,753
239
555

2.123
279
4 973
Quo

1.00 NA
fal Numbar Of Units I Non-Res._!.OOO_Sf

4.15~
IJ~
'4
2'38
J 10
12n
l 132
Quantity
1 Fl!cilhty IJiiiu Int~ rated Facllit
ihl l'ersons Slln,tod par Unit I I 000 Non-Res. SF

3.51 2.81

1.90 2.00
\.50

0.75 0 .50
F•~O!•Y UnllS
lnt8'1rnted F~lllt
Hf\
11>1
Persons Served par Unit f 1,0Q9 Non-Res. Sf
'.! 5~

2.81 1.90
200

1.50 0.15
QSO
FecllltY Units
lntC9tilled Fnt.:ilily
(cl
EDU.per Unit f l'w 1.000 Nc,n-Ros. SF

1.00 0.80

0.54 0,57

0.43 0 .21
0 .14
[cl
EDI/spar Unit
l!'W 1,0QQ Non-Ra Sf

1.00 0.80

0.~4

0.57 0.43

0.21 _[)J_ ◄
F111JIJN C°"
S28,046,000
"'~ JIii!
l<1l Tollll
Number of EDUs
f<ll •,c 9,758
1,402
12Q
316
907
60 708
u2a2
{di
Total
Number of EDUs
,a1.• c~
,155
Sflll
24 136
389
26 JOI
~ 622 .

Quantity
0tt 1 000 EtlUs

0.18 360
dta ;
'A.l Sll>rlll Drainage FIICliltln ~
l•I
ExlSllng
lm9grat8dF1clfl'1/ _1,!!!:l!!EDU'S
fl_!lfl_
APPENDIX A-6
CllY OF LOS BANOS

STORM DRAINAGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
(bl
Totalfuu.nt
EDU'a
'..1- 'l
lcJ
~Fecllh;yAltoca!iad100'l&
To N-Development
aJ"lbl ( 1 ., ...
(di
ProposldServlcl
Slunda111 per U IO!I QlU'w
fl•~
lei
lmagrated FICllffY per EDU
Beyond Exl5'1ng
[dl-l• J
n111
11-21~ Facility Beyond EicllUng SarvlceSlandllrd Split S-.. N-and Eidltlng. plUs Factlh;y Units al-100!5 to N-Develup,1w,1t lnl8gnlt8d Facility Split lntagnltad FecNlty
Numbel'OI l'Wee!Ugll OITOIIII 8-New- Alloca1ed 1ootl To fidllr,,T~ EOU'S EDU'a N_Dowel,,,__ Existing 13,~62 l026% ,,. .... 1;
Newllevf,....,_,. 5.62l 21).1'9' 0 !>Iii
Total 18.003 100.IIC.1' h~•
A.3 C-Allocatecl Between Existing and New DIMllopment
f8cl""''t""- •-
Total Numbar
Facl..,.

OI ~~~ Fadl"" Ccet
E,istlng 0.41 40.S.-% $11,364,!>04
Now Devl'llnMl•nt O.S9 59.48'11, $16681190
Total 1.00 ,~,~ S?804KOOQ
I Sumrr ~,,. t.,m 021 e ~ - ·-- ---~ Cost Allocated Tomi CCl!tper to New Devel Future EOV"s EDU
$16,681,496 !J,•112 $2,967.31

5.622
88 884 2.9 ,
II.~ lmp!IC_I _[1>tMr un1,or p:,r .J .IJOi) riun•l<~J. __ EDUsperUnlt/ Faas per Unit/ Number or Untts/
1 000 Non-Res. s.,. I Non-RM. S.F. 1.1)00 Non-Res. S.F.

1.00 $2.~-~6.13 4.155

0.80 SZ.386-50 736

0.54 Sl.601.27 44
057 $1,685.54 ,JR

0.43 $1,204.15 910

0.21 $637.08 120
In Stfilll 014 S47.1 .39 213<
Total A.lloCAtet'J to New Development
Outsld<! Fundlnr Resr,onsll>llll
Total Cost ofStonn nFacmt1es
lrJ
ll'IC9gl'llld ~ Beyond EJClltftU
Ser,lc,e _Standetd lbt•l•l 11000

0.58 TDIIII lnl8gl'ltlld FIClll1;y AIIOQlacl

0.41 0,59

1.00 Cost finer.cad by
DIF
S12,290.816
$1,742.440
S70,456
S401.257
Sl.150,775
S75.709
$898412
$16,629,864
$11 504
$2799 .388
(gJ
TCIIBIPl'llposed
New lmllgrel9d Feclln,y ir l•lf
' Q'.I.
361
dta/
Land Use Tl.e!
Single Family
Multifamily
Age Restricted
Retail
Office
Institutional
Industrial
Total
II F·1tur._, wu~cufhlo~ ~ ~
Land Use Type
Single Family
Multifamily
Age Restricted - Retail
Office
Institutional
Industrial
Total
Ill, Pronos!l'tu r. iutttfi,s C'..:•s:

Faclllty
Transportation Facilities Cost
Total Facllltles Cost
APPENDIX A-7

CITY OF LOS BANOS

TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Trip Generation Rate per
Total
Unit/ Per Non-Res. 1.000 Number of Units I Non- PM PHTs S.F. Res.SF (per Unlt/1,000 SF)

1.00 9.758 9,7511

0.69 1,753 1.214

0.54 239 129

4.98 555,240 2.767

1.00 2.123.183 2,119

1.21 279,366 337

0.85 4,972.718 4,214
20,538
-
, __ -~------~~-- - . - ~
Total
Trip Generation Rate per PM PHTs lJnlt / Per Non-Res. 1,000 Number of Unit~ I NonS.f. Res.SF (per Unlt/1,000 SF)

1.00 ·1,155 4,155

0.69 736 510

0.54 44 24

4.98 238,058 1.186

1.00 910,310 908

1.21 119,778 145

0.85 2,132.041 1,807
8,735
Faclllty
Cost
$58,539,061
$62,458,064
362
dta APPENDIX A-7

CITY OF LOS BANOS

TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
_•1•••> ■ .. 1"1u~1.;.,.ees..:u."1u11• .. Ill• ~IJ.r."'..a•1:i'I~u,1 i11; .i.1i:•1•'kl-~•••n•11ll itll L1 I Total Percentage of Faclllty
Oeval22ment Number of PM PHTs Cost Allocate<:! eostl
fxlS\mg l>evelopmenl 20,538 70.16% \ 5,679,9JJ
~w Development 8,735 2984% $2.415,633
Tota! Facilities Cost 29,273 10096 ,a.095 566
11nd New OP.valotllnom (b:1sed on PM Nfhl . - - .

TOUII Percentage of Feclllty
Oevelo~ment Number or PM PHTs Cost Allocsted Costj
Existing Development 20,538 70.16% $359.722
New_Qlll/.eloement 8,735 29.84% $152,987
Total Facllltles Cost 29,273 100% $512,709 ,
- I
Total Percentage or Faclllty
Oeveloement Number of PM PHTs Cost Allocated Cost!
Existing Development 20,538 70.16% S9,189,027
.New DevelQE?ment 8.735 29.84% 13,gQS.025
Total Facilities Cost 29,273 100% Stl,097.052
,1,r.J~lt!llllhJC-ti•I1£!1.ifili,t1~•fflJMili.i!Gil • , • • Total Percentage ~ Facility
Devel ment Number of PM PHTs Cost Allocated Cost
F.xisttng Development 20.538 7016% S2.03-1 ,GIJ
New Development 8.135 29,84% $865,306
Total Facllltles Cost 29.273 100% $2,899,919
-i.l-lll!lllllll•l!llm-1~n11111,rm !:~l~laZIMlil! I
Total Pereemage or Faclllty
oeve122ment Numt>ar of PM PHTs Cost Alloc:ated eostl
E.x•stlng Deverooment 20.!>38 70.16% $1,704,658
New Dqvelopment ~,735 29.84% '725.~
T 9tal Fsc;IUtl~ Cost 29,213 100% U,429,922
Ward Road Improve.
$8,095,566
$512,709
SR 165 lmnrove.
$13,097,052
Badqer Flat Road Improve.
$2,899,919
Caori Avenue lmr rove.
$2,429,922
363
dta/
t>eveiimmei:it.
f ,w,1 ing Development
New Development
Total Facilities Cost
APPENDIX A-7

CITY OF LOS BANOS

TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Totlll Percentage of
Number of PM PHTs Cost Alloceted
20,538 7016% $231.11B
8,735 29.84% $98,293
29,_273 1002&_ $329,411
-
IV Al !nr_·;1• ,oq :it Fn:, 111-'4;. '11 [1.itt1nQ and Nr~w fJ, VP1t: pmcn! (ba~~',.1.-,n PM i:') n "'-.aj _ - - - -::.__- -=--=-- - -- Oevelo ment
Existing Development
NewDcvelo 1cnt
Total Facllttles Cost
Deve.topJnent
Existing Development
New Develoument
Total Facilities Cost
Total
Number of PM PHTs
20,538
8,735
29,273
Total
Number of PM PHTS.
l0,53B
~735
29,273
IV. Allocat 1nn c.f fnt d•t•c·, \U lo ,1·,t:r><J 1nd N1cw IJ<.: v<, luprT1cnt (ti;:i• <>,J r:,n r-•1,PKJII ,. __ Deveto mem
Existing Development
New DIMllo t
Total Facllltles Cost
!)eveloi:,ment
E.xrsting Development
New Devefocmenl
Total Facilities Cost
Total
Number or f'M PHTs

20.538
8,735
29273
Total
Numbllf' of PM PHTs
20,!;.:,lj
8,735

29.273
-
Percentage of
Cost Allocated

70.16%

29.84%
100%
Percentage of
Cost Allocate<I

70.16%

29.84%
100%
Faclllty
Cost
11,833,647
$779.836
S 613 483
Facility
Cost
$819.978
$348,731
S1,16Jl,709
-- --~ ---------=---=- --!
Percentago of
Cost Alloc:eted
7016%

29.84%
100%
ParcSf'ltage or
Cost Allocated

70.16%
29-84%
100%
Facility
Cost
i 18.025,85~
~7.921.436
$2 547,290
Faclllty
Cost
$ /0,161
l.21:l,839
$100,000
Dove Street lml>rove.
$329,411
Pioneer Road lmorove.
$2,61M83
Cardoza I Madison AvcLPaqe Ave Improve.
$1,168,709
Intersection & Modification lmr;rove.
$26,547,290
Intersection & Modification Improve.
$1 00,000
364
dta/ APPENDIX A-7

CITY OF LOS BANOS

TRAFFIC DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Devel.!mm_
Existing Oeveloprnen1
New _Q~veIor men,t
Total Facilities Cost
- 'd•lf -~i.~~i:t
Facil_l!Y_
Traffic Facilities Cost
Total
Total
fllumber QI' PM PkTs

20.538

8.735
29,273
VI. O<>veloper foes and Cost F1nnncfld by re<?s per Unit/ per 1,000 Nori-Ros. SF Average Dally PM PHT per
Unit/ per 1,000 Non-Res.

Land Use Tvoe SF
Single Family 1.00
Multifamily 0.69
Age Restricted 0.54
Retail 4.98
Office 1.00
Institutional 1.21
Industrial 0.85
Total Allocation to New Development
Total Allocated to ExistlnLJ Development
Total Facllltles Costs
Percentage of
CostAIIOCl\ted
70 16%

29.84%
100%
Total
Number of PM PHTs
8,735
8,735
Fees per Unit/ 1,000 NonRes.SF
$1,303.58
$903.11
$703.93
$6,495.18
$1,300.86
$1,574.04
$1.104.71
Facility
Cost
$5.2.000
$222,~
$7-1$,000
Faclllty Cost
Allocated to
New Development
$17,467.449
Number of Units / Non-Res.

Intersection & Modification lmµrove.

Cost Per
PM Peak Hour Tr!_e
$1,999.77
!l.303.58
$745,000
SF Cost Financed by DIF
4,155 $5.416.294
736 $664,953
~ $30,973
238,058 $1,546,230
910,310 $1,184,184
119,778 $188,535
2,132,041 $2,355,283
$11,386,452
$41,071,612
$52,458,064
365
dta
.. .. ...... . fadHty Tvi::m
City Hall t.xpanston and Rehnhilitallon
City Hon Parking Lot and Lardscopl n~
Council Chan;hRr Upgrade
Network/Server Replacement
Corporatlort Ynrd Ex• ans.ion
General Govemmant FacititiA~
......

Lan<!UseT- Single Fem,ty
MultirNnlly
Age RestnttP.d
Reta'I
Offir:e
lnstitutfonal
Industrial
Total
Facl lh• TCity Hsu Exponsion and Rehabflilruk>r,
City Haff Parking lot and Landsr .. 1plno
Council Chamber Upgrade
Network/Server Replacemem
CornnrBlion Yard E - -ion
•• ',l""' ,. •
LandU..TSingle Famay
Multifamily
Age ReSll'ICtP.d
Retail
Omcl'
lnst1tutiona1
lnduYrial
T,_1
.. ' .... _ .. ... ... ... .. .

Fac!lll-.TCity Hall Expnminn and RehatJililHUon
City Hall PMkh,g Lot •nd Lllnoscap,nq Council Chamber Upgrade Netwo<k!SP.rV8r Replacement
Corporation Yard E,panslon
O'f!attlf')'ft Rov4if'l'li8S
Total Cost of Gen<.!nll Gowmment Facilities
APPENDIX A-8

CITY OF LOS BANOS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
~·~ ~KllftYUnl\s
31,800 Squo..., Feet
33,000 $quaf'C Feet
1 JntogrmP.d f;icl lity
1 lnlf'tgNllM Ftteilily
lnte-:1ratcd f ilcllltv
[al lbl (cl
N<lfflber of Units Penons Sanled par Unit EDUs per Unit / Non-Res. 1.000 SF / 1,000 Non-RIiis. SF / rwc 1 000 NDII-Ras, SF 9,758 3.51 1.00
1,753 2.81 0.80
239 1.90 0.5 ◄
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Quantity n.----- Faclll<• Ur,lts -1.000 Nan-Res. SF
31,800 Sqlml'R Feet 7.,816.71

33.000 Squ1're feet 2.923,00
1 lntegteted Fuclllty 0,09
1 1ntegrn1M FAcility 0.09
lntP. r3lcd f ncilit•
[el 11>1 1,.1
NUfllber of Units Resl<lonts per Unit/ £mp!~ EDUspor Unit I Non•RN. 1.000 Units ,_. Nan-~tl!lc 1,000 SF , ,_ 1 000 Nonl!el. Sf 4,155 '.j 51 1.00
736 2.81 0.80
44 1.90 0,54
0 0.00 000
0 0 00 0.00
0 0.00 0,00
0 0.00 O,OC)
Qulnu"' Fecllltv Unlb FtK:llil:v C01t
40,050 Square Feet S'i,2-lf),C!,Q

35.150 Squtir~ Feet $1,751,750
1 lntegrMfffi Facility $200,000
1 lntegrntP.d Facility $185,824
1 lntagrated Focillty !,1,350,000
IUlz.3811
(OJ
10181
Number or UnllS
a •tc 1
9,758

1.402
129
-
-
-
- 11290
(di
Total
Num-of UnllS
'a 1•:c1

4.15~
589
24 0
0 0
0 4788
Quantity
-1.oooEOUs
8,400.13
7,498.24
O.ll

0.21 0.21
366
dta
#1.l c:ll;Y Hall Expenslon Ind -tllllllon
[ii)
Eldstlng
Squvefeet
llllln l'lllr.
.'ij!fil"·
APPENDIX A-8

CITY OF LOS BANOS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
(h] [r.] (d)
ToalFuan Square Feet Allocaled 1<Xn' ProposedSemce
£DU's To New Ouvelopment Standenlp,r e• 1 twa
tlt\11 I-H2\'4!i B 4llll 1·,
A2 Squn Feel hyond Exlstlnfl Service standanl Split 8-1 Newand £Jdstl1111,.p1u, Fec:tlll;Y Units allocated 100'i. u, Naw Dllvulopmwit Fae!IIN T,,.,. E,istlng
New··0ovo1n~
:1ot8I
A.SCOSlAllocatBd B6lWNn EidStlng and New Deve!QPlllll'lt f!!<:illlY.I- Existing
New Dovelfl!lment
Total
S:f Ctty Hall Parking Lot and Landscaping
l•l
l!xtstlng
Squaref8at
t.Q!!!!EOlr.
2923,00
Numberot
EDU's
11,700
•.me
1"058
Total
Sauare fmt
111 ns ◄ ?
?1,:!:13h8
rn.O !lQ
lb)
Totlll Fuan
EDU's
CF
PlreefflegeotTo181
£DU's
'10.31%
2tJ.&W.
1'"" "
Cost Allo cllllld
46731'
sa.mr. iS,r:rl r~:
{ti
Square FeetAnocatsd 100!' To Naw Developmeut
I!! 'lb fl <l ij Jl

8.2 3-re Feet Beyond Eldstlnjr Serw:e 5111ndard ;l!;llt B«weer'I -and ElllltlnJI. lllul Faclllty Unb .noc.ted 100Sta New DeYelollmlnt Fac!At~ TVla N~oJ! l'Wcentlge of Total
EDO's
Existing 11,290 10.m,
.New Devoto, 1'11<!Jlt 4 768 29.69%
Tot21 11!.056 100,~
B.3 Cost Allocated ~ Eld sting and Nvw Developrtllnt
Total
f ocHiNt- SauereFeut Cost Alloceted
Existing 15,336.86 4290'l(,
NewDe'lel- 20.413.14 57,1011,
Total 35 7,;n nn ,~ .. - ~ 1 Councl! c:iiimber\J~
!•J (bl (cl
Eldldng TOIIIIFlllln l!U\J11118d Faclllty Allaceted 1oca ,,,.,....., FacHky EDU's TO New DenlopttMtl: 1 poc, !IIU's ar t, ~F-Splt
8MWea'I New •!'Id Exlstl"" o..,,...._ 1!1,716.4Z 7 904,13 l f•f•.ZO\•
fllffl!!gCost
$3.387.8'/1
$3,861.379
!7J iQ I
[d)
l'N)pOeedServlce
Sl8fl!lanlper
,,ooo ~
•Q9. 1A
Square ,_Spit
Bet-,Nawend
£,tisti""
·',,JJlo .,
~'16111
1! ~· ·'
,_Cott S751 .!i05
S1,000,Z44
q 751 7Sl'l
(d)
Fropolods.rvtce
Standard per I.OOOEOU'S
009 . ,, •-~-------~o.

C.2 lragrat8(1 FIICllllyllayolld~ngSerwaSl-.s Spll ~ N--E>ISC!ng. plUsfaclffl;YUnns•n-1ocatoNew De'.lllopt,lelll lrugrlled FtcHlty Spilt
Number"' Percentage of TOW S-.,Nawand fec!llovT- !IIU's EDU'I Ell ElClsUng 11,?90 7031" Qi'•
New Oeve""'"1ent 4,168 29.611W,
Tutal 1~ 0611 , on - "'II'
C,3 CostAlloceted ...,_,.Ealstlng-New~
TOUJI
Flid'"" r- , _ ___, ,~,- CostMocated FedllrvCost EMlstlng 0.41 40.1!2% SR1.233 Nftw Dovelo• mC!'lt c~ 59.JRll, Sl1fl l67
T0111I ..... •t]ri,-Offl urc,,.111
Col (I) [g]
Sql.-'ll feetp,rEOU Squere FNt 111,yond EIClstlng T<Jtal l'r<,poeecl hyond Existing Sen,lca 5'anclard N8W Square f1l8t d'• a lb •te /1000 C 4-(1 ',88~4. 1/; ii20 ~~ ~ ------ 400S0.00
Alloc:lmd ~-100. To Tote! Squere Feet PwN AIIOea1ad
NIA 18,71642

13.42A 46 21333.bB
40, ... . 00
l•l ffJ lGl
Square Feet p,r EDU Square Feet Beyond Eid.Ung TQtel Propo9ld a.yonoExlltlng ·5erv1oe Salndaro New Sqiare Feet
[dd a bl'i•ll1000 l•1•1tl 4,li75.24 . 1 111\ J. ·"'·'' r:,, Square fetlt
Altocnecl 1®'l To Total Square Fett
- AIIOeatlld
N/A 16,3-16.86
13,936.23 :!0.413.14
.l5 J!(li'ln
1•1 (fl lqJ lnlegl'llllld Faclltty per EDU h1legrfflcl Faclltty Beyond Etdltlng Totlll'l'opmad Beyond Eldstlng StrltcteSlandord N-lntllgratecl Faclll'CY ld ·r~l l'•.'le! 11000 l•j

0.12 f!,_, c 1.00
lna,gratad Faclllty
Alloclted 1<Xn' To Total 11'1111g11it1111 Facility
New Allcleated N/A 0.41

0.42 0,59
•.co
367
dta

0.1N~llep--..: 1•1 Existing
l~Feclllty
1,000 EOU-s
!i.!12
APPENDIX A-8

CITY OF LOS BANOS

GENERAL GOVERNMENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
lb]
TOUIIFuWre
EOIJ's
•Th.,
(,:)
lnlegfatod f1ctuly Arlocal9d 1005
To N-~ n l•m
9, ◄,
i<'l
Propo9eds.vlce
Standard per
j.Q!!!!_l'.Q!J_'~
_JP
D.Z Integrated Flc:lll\y lle)ol,d Eidstlng Service Standwcl Split ~ New ,u,d E.Jd!llng, p1Us Facility Unit> allocated 1°'"' to N9W 0...lopment f _,111,vTEltistlog
NewOr,vt':to., f'Of?flt
lotal
D.3COltAlloclltlldllulwNn~ng•nd New~
Facum,, ifxlst,ng
New~o1memt
Total
E. j Corparaaon Val'\! Ei,penslon
l•l
EldStll'l!I
#REF! ~Elll!'I ..

N-or
EDIJ's
:1.290
4 168
1605H
Total
1-ftcNftv
041
0 50
,.oo
(bl

TOIIIFUIIN
EDIJ's
.i lfof
...,.,.niage onED\J's

70.31%

29.61W, ,~ .. ~
C-Moc:alad

40.62!1

59.JA" 1i~nn,
tel
AllocNd 100.

To N-DIYltopmlnt
IJ1' th1
E.21,..-Fecll~lleyond Eidstlng SoNlca StandlrdSplltS-, N&w-Eldsllng. plus FecllNi,Unllll 111-.i 100SID ..... DMIIO\Ailiflt Nur.-ot ,,____.oAT- . Fecltltv l"""' EDU'I E0\1'3
E•lsting 11,290 70.31'11
New t>ev@i0i-1'118r,l 768 Z9,5g11
Tou,I 16058 100.00'JI
El Cost.Allocetlld S-. Exlstlng and N- Dm,fopnant
TOIBI
Fldlllv T- 1-F1ci11N Cost Allcrcetad
Existing 0.70 7031!1
New Devefoument 0.30 29.69'1
,, .. "' ,m 1tJ(r_,,,, .
. ~. ... , ... , ... Cmt Allocated
Factll..., T- u. New owe- m General Govt. facilities SS,491 .~79 TOW! S3 347 341
ll ~ lrnt>M. ~ r ~ ' f Ol•s per 1Jni1/
Land USeT 1,000 Non-Riis. S.F. SlnJ:Jle Fomtty 1.00
Multifamily 080 Afll! Restricted OM
Retalf 0.00
Office 0.00
lnstitulional 0.00
lndustrlP.il 0.00
Total Alk>cnterl to NP.W Oaveloi.,mcnt
Outside Fuodin• Rasor•nslhlllt
Tffl8 Cost of Police Fadlltles
~Id feel!~ Spllt ........., __ UJ>'!no
◄
•I
I•.
f11tltlNCot\
$h475
$110349
~·~·-814
[dl
PropoMd Semce
Sllndlrd par 10CIO El>U's
lml,lad F1clllty Spllt
.,_9!!-'~ O.IU
0$)
1 00
factlll'I""" 1n,1a ll~U
t-400,".tn
'I I . 'l~ll 000
T-1 FwueEDll's 4,/f.'t
4,766
~per Unit/

1.000 Non-Riis. S.F.
$702.07
$56'.66
S380.01

10.00 SO.()()
so.oo $(\,fl<)
l•l Ill tragrNd feclllty par EDU I~ Feclllty Beyond~
Beyond Exlsllng SeMca Sllnclanl
,d>i• l 'b • 9{ / 1000
" Oli!'_
lntqallld Facillty
All-1°'"'To T<al ln1IIQfat8d facllHy N- ARocalad
NI .. 0 .41

0.4? 0.59

1.00 tel 111
ll'lle!INltMI Facllty llr/ond Eatll'l!I ~
Se!YlceSlandlnl
Fldfltypar EDU
lllyond Exlltlng
9 .:i~L =- b 'e;,/1000_
JU I _].!l!!_
lnllgratmFaclllty
Al-1005To T-• •~Faclll\Y -~ AIIOClled
w .. 0,70

0.00 O.JO
UIO
Cost per
EDU Sl ,151.81
1702.07
Number 01 IJnlltf Cost Financed "" 1,000 Non-Ras. S.F. DIF 4,155 S2,917,072 ne $413,546
44 $16.722
0 SC
0 so 0 so 0 so SJ.341,341
SS,245 045
8 92386
!<>I TOUII PropoNd
..... I~ fldllt)'
J.d•"
_.!I_
[gJ
TOIIIIPr_.i
lww lragnted Fcllh,y -~ !1 }1
"'
368

APPENDIXB
2019 Needs List
369

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
370
f: •!!!( "'9Ifcm>N fACHJTJ!S
1 -S(lftd. T-F--fOCI ,
, __ __
, -~--£4uipn,onc.-MMOIIJraondNI, .....
·-·
,..,.....laMnwmn«tflllCl:lmmlt#d
TOTAL FIRE PROTfCTION FACIUJJP
, ,,,_,,_ __
Jllll'GOFac:1111,
lflaaYehldn ·---
TOTALf'OUCE 'ACIHI!P
c. PMFAC/l,lljtS(!!gj);Wmlzil
e,,,,N:!PPMift?WR#PlmmePM$QenJtpf WTAf-'JIU!!S:"lP§l!!ATIONFACILITIB , --T-l'tlnlOnoLClmnlumer-., z _ ___,,,.__....,... ,_....,_..... , -u..,
,_,.
,w ........ , __
·~ • .....,T_and_Pumpo ,o~w.a. ,, __ liY'IOJft
•-Uno~ ·---
J_Cll),_n
··--- 6--- '"""'--
,--- •-IU>nnlh
I CIINlllcondllnffll line
1:, H-tllnolt$1lOnnlJnl
1IH•HlwdlltmfflUnt "»-\h--~- 1J ~~a.tonlllhlblRIMion
14WWTI'_
,,_...,,,
16 WWTP • lludge17 WWTP • Cold Mlx °'""'Y ,._ ,, fllacltlllW...-LntoWWT'P ... _ ,...,_ 21 .......,T,_..,.Pllnt

12.....,Tnnt
ZJlonftTrunll: ;,_,.,.
15~T"'"" 2'-T"'""
1'ColotoTnfflk ,._Tlln<
TprALS!WUI FM>UTlD

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM

CITY PE LOS BANOS
PUBLIC EAclLIIIES NEEDS UST THROUGH 2038
-
(1)
Si.5TU38
S5•5.000
M.5eC.OCO
1341.839
U.800)00
S.34,600.000
S1Z.SOO.OOD
ss::io.uoo

11.845.Hl
Sl~.l~
U2:.7E-5,.UJ
112.000.000
11,500.000
1260,61,,333
SZla,000
szso.coo
Sl.212.COO
Sl,620,000
S398.S28
$l,.56COOO
147900,
S234600C:>
1"11.3t0,000
510,815.00J
J1Jlt1'1#!
S,00.000

11.785.000
U,298,000
St.230.000
U50,000
IS67,000
1161,000
SASJ.000
UCI0.000
'""'""" S"'6,00G
Slli',OOC
S)S3.000

56.615.000
nc,ooa
S2iOQ.>O
S150.000
,200.000
!1.012,300
$1,055.000
M.183,000
S9.303,000
S3Ui81,000
Sl,604,000
11,0.9.000
S822.00C
Sl60.000
H.083.000
mnui,o
Ill
so
so
so
.... "°
so
so
so
so
so
so ",T J;'1t""li
so
so
,0
J? 'r.41!f
,o
so
so
,0
so
IC
so
IC
1:
so
,..
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
so
,o
so
so
,o
so
so
so
,o
so
so
10 ID
so
141.579.93!
!5-45.000
$.4,<IOO.COO
s,,:.5!9
U.800.000
110011,111,
S34.BOO.OOO
S.12.500.000
L!'.00.000

11.7-'S.132
Sl!,O.US
¥1 f11MC117
SlZ.768.ttl
S12,000,000
StSOO.OOC
f:!USUff
!:15l,1H,911
SZ30.000
S250.000
IJ,212,000
Sl.i2C.OOO
UDS.528
Sl.560.000
S4l9,00C
S23. 60.!JOC
Sll.Wl.000
SJ:).BtS.000
111"9!:'I
1100.000
$1,195,000
S.2298.000
S.1.,Z30,DC()
HS0.000
l-567.000
Sl6t00C
«53000
1100.000
1286.000
S2B6.COO
Sl12,COO
53!1:J..000

16.S40.000
UC.000
1250.0C:l
Sl5C.OCJ
S20C,000
$1,012.300
S1~5.000
U.183.000
l.U.98.000
s.2u.1a1.ooo
Sl.604.000
'" so
10 1970,000
14U•1n
t•J ISi
PM:llnt.rCOll ColtASIDaladlD
~-.,.,__

81.220> U.G&, rY.,
29'14, , 1t-:.~!:'')
68-~" •·:-.:t!:1.;3

69.48'1 'lZ,!,,~
89U% ,, 29:;,QJ
maa S1.DJla,t.!i
Z9.l4'K- Sl0.349.356
"""" S1.460,174
....... S297,3SIS
. .,. ... ll.038.J•!i

59.'8'5 m.,,e:

SI)
- flW10C.000. ,._ IJV68,2c3
S~.563.1)20
SUS% 1890165
a- !9,IID,ffli

56.951' $86.677.213
2U41'o SifUOI l9.1,, S,4,349
297,,. 1955.234

29.7£'1- S-'SUB!J

29.lH S115.52C
151.1•,r, 1463~7

29.1Lf> 1142,452

29.l'-% I5i76..8S3

29.1l.tl SJ371."62
2U.t~ 'S3216.1SO
9,1111 e
SQ.49,r, $118,958

59.4'3" S1.00l.649
.. 59.41" _ Sl,366.629
1131.$92

59.~ $208,177

59.,6'1, 1337.2•6
...... 195,161
··- sru,,uo .,_ S59,09

59.46% S17Cl1C
sun 1110.rc

59.481, S165.St!:

S9.t5'1, SZOB.177
,un S3.889~3

59.481. S~t6lS

59.41~ SU8,69a
59A!iS Sf!.9,219

59.48>; Sll8.Q!i8
!9,48~ $002.106

59..C89l '627,504
....... SUBB.009

59.48'4 12,913.28£
SUB'il, S15,572.2i2
SUR $954,04,
,,.,,. SC
o.clCK so O.OOll
59,'8,. SS76.9.U "'
,.., ... m3,u02
(6}
~~-°'lll"IIW
,~~t#t~.:.,o,,,.::,e, ~
Ca;. '" .r,~ ._.....,.~, P-e-
~~-, or;.~•.;e
t: • .,.,:. ;'\fLMt,v•
,::.~"l-"'; 'C~-..-e
C'.ep1tel lmprovon-..nl Pla,n
ColJncif Objet:liva
CepJtsl :mprovcmen:. Plan
Counc-1 ~
c~~ectiW
Co1.m.::.10b;ectrve
C~lObjective
0ot.rnt.4°'!iltClW
WISterMt5terF'len
Cep!ilMl~Ptan
Captta!l~F'lan
Ctp1t1fl'. .fflf:l"'\'itrnfln: PS,n
CapJt.• ltnp(OVli!S'Nlnl. Plan
Cepi:al ltnprC\lernenr. Plan
Ce,),ta'l lmpn:,-mnent Olan
Cap1tall~r;-effl ?;tin
W,u,~~Plr
Wl4efMMl:erPw.

WIU!rWut«Plan
Cap1~111 lfflp,ovemont Pltn
Cepital Improvement Plan
CeprtM lmprow!ment Plen
Cepitet lr,ip,overnn Plan
capitall~ertPlen
C.p.lal'l~Aa"I
Cep12'.llmpt'Ovf:menl.Pl!I!'\
C11p tat •~-eme:"t Plr.:

Cep,ta . MJl-ovemer:l Plar:

C&pn..- :mJrOVernent f'len
CM,161 lmp-o,.,iBmef't. A_,
Capi:,11lr.,pic .. e-1TMW1C.Plll'I
Ceptt..i tmpmvamert Pl&n
(:aJ:-11.al lfTI?'OW!~nt ?Ian
(;ap.tal lf'!"pmvai,,ltl'll P.-1
CapUJ IMpn:JVemfflt Pen
Cepttll"'.'lproveml!m.Plen
Cap 1111 lmprcvoment Pla:-i
Cap.lei lmprovGJT18nl P!e:i
Cep1u11 Jmpr~ant.Plan
5e'NerM11.1uirfl'ltn
SflwnrM8'terPIM
Sewci M~er f'lan
~~RtPlar.

Sewor~lf!"l-il.an
Sa'NWWtt«PiM
SeOA«MMtttf'lan
Se'MttMaslerP!en
371
1 - -a l UA"'-F 111,,,..llrirn
,_ .... ,_ •-tw.2-
3CllruoT--
•Collogo-No.1-
5 Collogo-No.2-
G CNielcMIINo. lSij).llltJn ,_11o.2-.-

80.WH111-
9-No.landGordnlNo.2-
10 GlftllnlNo,ISJb-tlllln
121--- ~Ntl. ISUIH:lllln
73-No.ZW>-- " ..,,.,..11o.2- ,s Walmlnffo.1$ub-l:llsln
16 WatnmtNo, 2 SUb-baln
, , __ __ .._ _
JSR165i_,,.,..

SCljlrlA_._.,.. •-flll-- ____
, __ ""-
BClntoalld.Madbon_llld,. s_, __ _ __
10Tnlll0-l'lan
11 UIJIIQ,Voll-lllCIEqul1hlmc'@dllfl#.,.,,..,.,.not:t'!£~ TOl'AL TIWl'IC FACIUTIES

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM

CITY OF LOS BANOS
PUBLIC FACILITIES NEEDS UST THROUGH 2038
Ill {21 {J)
,...,ea,,..,~ NetCootlOCII)'
snaooo so ...... 000 so W.000 so $12,MJl,otli so $5-.029.000 so S10.0SS.OOO ,o -- S-10,363,000
53,015.000 so S7.5SO.OOO srnu,oo lttffl.000 $0
S20.-4lS.000 so SS,126,000 10
$Zi.SSO.OOO 117,504,000
tt2.U5,000 so S7.230.000 10
S12192.DOO so
$200/!!i1.CIOO gp:n•«ui W,INA
Sf.1,095.566 so SS.005,566
1i512.7DP "' 1512,?09
SJ.3.091,.052 so sil097.C52
SZS99.919 so Sl.899.-919
$2."29.922 so S2~29.922
$329.411 so $329 . .tll
S2.61l,48S so S2.61;f,483
SJ.168.100 so $1,168.709
SZG,!it.1.290 ,o S26.&41,M
1100.000 so S10D,OOO
S14S,000 so U4!i,OOO
ffl:ffl'lll ,, !H.458.DIC

1.1-§ENWLGQJl!RNMENifACRJTl§!CfrtHU CenumrJl!yCpw.e,;,t!efae/1111• m!Ct/!Rsm'9DYG'"""""""'X!!WI"Pfi1lndl IQyHdt,po,,slon .. - 2 QyHd""'ln;Ull:tnd._.
, --\lpgrado ·-"""""""'"" 5 CorpomlOnYMIErponslon
ff!!!lt/~&!9t--Del "'"""""""' TOTALGfHtRM.90Y£!NWNT ffll'.IUTIES TOTALAU.FACfLffl§
1~1 ,!tn9 Noem Lt:· (Ntt~,ng Do:::unK<>t;
121 ~ment1mpec1hndBalen-::'i!StsCff1!:,C;/ Yi..&r10U!.-2:la}!="nr.t 131 A.",,!~•~ M!lcYlty er Of'fsctt1!'tQ Rtlver'll.t:!i ..,.n oe uiJP! ~d tc p11y ro· di,bt :serv1re on the p. .. o;)Ox:-d f>r,""1,3')' St:i11on S7.2~9.'C50
Sl.751.753
S20000J
S?15.~
S1,SSO.OOO
'"°•-
J77UWH
so S1,249.05C
so u.1.s1,1so SC ,200.000
S:Sf,824
so 11,350.000
1S-11f lJI •m,m
ClJP 't7!f7'· Y:P,§1!,ffl
{4)
··-
0001>

0.00il
"""" 0.00%

0.00,,
"'·- O,OO'Jt,

59.481b

0.00. 0.00%

0.00%

59.48'1,

0.00%

0.00$
O.Oll'i<
-
29,1;4'W,
,. ..... 29114"-
29B4%
29B4'S
,,, ......
, "'""" .... ,. 2S.84'll.
,.,,.,,

29.84'lt

11.ffll

53.V~
_,,, 5U0111
5!1385'
.......
-
4!.1JII
{51
so
so
so
"' so
10 S:5,163.815
so SI06.46a
so
so
so llD,411,214
$0
IC
so
.. ,.,.,.

Sl.-415.633
$152.967
tJ.905.02!
!865.33&
U25.o&4
,002a,
Sl79,836
,34a131
57,!J2U36
$29,839
l222,300
f11.HM2
$3.Slii.319
nooc:2.e~
S1l8,767
SHQ.349
l400.84a
p.NJrKI
UOU81m
(6)
Stom Onll"'I Mos:w PJar,
StO"r." Cn.rMast«Aan
Storm enm wamr Alln
Storm ~Jl.astarPlan
Storm D'atnMaster Plan
Storm OrllittMMter Pl!l'l
Stcrm Oran MaslB l':an
Stoon tnl'n MaslM P.an
Stenn Oran Mas.terPU!n
Storm Chin MMrw Pia~
Storm DramMesterl'ial'l
Stom, Drall'\ Masw Ran
StarmDl'l'.IITTW.~Plan
Storml:ninMa5Ul"Plan
Stam Onun N'.aster Plan
Storm Drain Master Pl8II
Crun:tCl;je<ove
Cu:..-ndiO?yect:;-ve
C.tl!lncil OtlJect.-ve
Cowie! O~fecn,e
Courttif~ect.rvf!
Cou"ICIIOl?jccthleC1)Ur.eil0~:eetM:t
Coun'-110tiiecli\'O
Count1l0t?ieettve
Capiltil Improvement Plan
CepitBI lmprl'WAm&f'lt Plan
Counol Ot¼'eet,,e
C!M!ciJ~ecttve
Cllptalt~tAar:
(:(iptUf ;mp~e:Y.Rlan
Ccon:::l~nebva
372
373
CC 01.15.2020 wav
EXHIBIT "B"

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
7 374
d
www r nancelll A 1

SECTION VI

SUMMARY OF FEES
The total fee amounts required to finance new development's ·tair share" of the costs of facilities in the Needs Lists are summarized in Table 43 below.

Table 43: City of Los Banos Development Impact Fee Summary Single Family $1.258 $2.354 $7,028 $6,317 $4,847 $2.958 $1.304 $702 $803 $27,571 Multi-family $1,006 $1,883 $5,622 $5,054 $3,878 $2.367 $903 $562 $638 $21.913 Age Restricted $681 $1,274 $3,604 $3,419 $2,624 $1.601 $704 $380 $435 $14,92! Retan $717 $1341 $0 $3,599 $2,762 $1.686 $6,495 $0 $498 $17,098 Office $538 $1.006 $0 $2.700 $2,071 $1.264 $1.301 $0 $266 $9,146 rnstltutlonal $269 $503 $0 $1,350 $1,036 $632 $1.574 $0 $161 $5,524 Industrial $179 $335 $0 $900 $690 $421 $1.105 $0 $109 $3,740 Cfty of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study
...,.,,,,., •t 201• /
48 I
375
CC 01.15.2020 wav
EXHIBIT"B"

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
7 376
I
d a www FinanceOTA com

SECTION VI

SUMMARY OF FEES
The total fee amounts required to finance new development's "fair share" of the costs of facilities in the Needs Lists are summarized in Table 43 below.

Table 43: City of Los Banos Development Impact fee summary ------ -- - - -- -
Cr~y of Los B,1110.;
Dev('1optn1.;m ImpJc~ recs pi:r Untt (Residcntial)/l.000 ~qu;J.tc• rcu {t~on~ne~1dent111) Slnglel'amtly $1,258 $2.$54 $7,028 $6,317 $4,847 $1.958 $1.304 $702 $803 $27.571 Multi-family $1.006 $1.883 $5,622 $5,054 $3.878 $2,367 $90! $562 $638 $21.9ll Age Aeltrlcted $681 $1,274 $3.804 $3,419 $2.624 $J.601 $704 $380 $435 $M.92! 'Retllll $717 $1,341 $0 $3,599 $1.762 $1,686 $6,495 $0 $498 $.17- Office $538 $1,006 $0 $2.700 $1.071 $1,264 $1,301 $0 $266 $9.146 Instltuttonal $269 $50! $0 $1,350 $1,056 $632 $1.574 $0 $161 $5.52.4 Industrial $179 $535 $0 $900 $690 $421 $1.105 $0 $109 $3,740 Clly of Los Banos
Development Impact Fee Justification Study December !12019 / 48 '
I
377

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
378
ORDINANCE NO. 1178
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY .OF LOS BANOS
AMENDING TITLE 9 CHAPTER 2 ARTICLE 6 OF

THE LOS BANOS MUNICIPAL CODE

ESTABLISHING A GENERAL GOVERNMENT

FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
WHEREAS, the City Council enacts this ordinance pursuant to the authority granted cities by Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Element of the City of Los Banos' (hereinafter "City") 2030 General Plan update "requires new development to pay its proportionate share of the costs of public infrastructure, services, and transportation facilities. This shall include parks, fire, and police stations, schools, utilities, roads, and other needed infrastructure"; and
WHEREAS, to help finance needed public facilities within the City, the City has adopted Ordinances to establish appropriate development impact fees pursuant to Government Code sections 66000 et seq; and
WHEREAS, the City has not updated or revised its development impact fee program since October of 2006; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with policies established in the 2030 General Plan update, staff has taken steps to conduct a comprehensive review of the City's development impact fees .to determine whether those fees are adequate to defray the cost of public facilities related to the development project; and WHEREAS, OTA (previously known as David Taussig & Associates, Inc.) was engaged by the City to prepare .an updated AB 1600 Fee Justification Study; WHEREAS, as a part of the update effort the City has held a number of stakeholder's workshops attended by interested community members and the development community; and
WHEREAS, DT A. has prepared a report, entitled Development Impact Fee Justification Study, dated December 31, 2019. that calculates the maximum fee levels that may be imposed on new development and sets forth the nexus/basis for the imposition of the fees on new development: and
WHEREAS, the City Council held and conducted a public hearing on January 15, 2020, in accordance with applicable public notice, to review and consider the Development Impact Fee Justification Study, and the updated Development Impact Fee Schedule and this proposed ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to amend Chapter 2 Title 9 Article 6 of the Los Banos Municipal Code relating to development impact fees iri the City of Los Banos by combining the Corporate Yard Development Impact Fee; City Hall Development Impact Fee; and Community Center Development Impact Fee: and establishing a General Government Facilities Development Impact Fee consistent with the above referenced Development Impact Fee Justification Study, and the updated Development Impact Fee Schedule.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS BANOS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Pursuant to Resolution 6163 the City Council using its independent judgment found and determined that the Development Impact Fee Justification Study prepared by OTA and dated December 31, 2019, complies with California Government 1 379
Code section 66001 by establishing the basis for the imposition of fees on new development. The City Council hereby incorporates those findings by reference herein in that the Development Impact Fee Justification Study. (a) Identifies the purpose of the fee;
(b) Identifies the use and the public facilities to which the fee will be put:
(c) Shows a reasonable relationship between the use of the fee and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed;
(d) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the type of development projects on which the fee is imposed; and (e) Demonstrates a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facilities or portion of the public facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed.

Section 2. The City Council of the City of Los Banos does hereby add the following section to Title 9, Chapter 2, Article 6 of the Los Banos Municipal Code.

Sec. 9-2.614 General Government Facilities Development Impact Fee.

The City hereby establishes a fee for general government facilities to serve new residential and nonresidential land uses in the City and the City Council does hereby impose a general government facilities development impact fee to be paid at the rate set forth by City Council resolution.

Section 3. To the extent that the terms and provisions of this Ordinance may be inconsistent or in conflict with the terms or conditions of any prior City ordinance, motion, resolution, rule or regulation governing the same subject, the terms of this Ordinance shall prevail with respect to the subject matter thereof and such inconsistent or conflicting provisions of prior ordinances, motions, resolutions, rules or regulations are hereby repealed.

Section 4. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase added by this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective.

Section 5. The proposed amendments to the Los Banos Municipal Code do not propose any changes to City policies or regulations that would result in a direct or indirect physical environmental impact; therefore it has been determined that this ordinance amendment is covered by the general rule that the California Environmental Quality Act applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15061 (b)(3) and is not subject to environmental review. Alternatively, the proposed amendments to the Los Banos Municipal Code were contemplated as a subsequent implementation measure to address impacts on · public facilities contemplated in the Los Banos 2030 General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2006121055)("GP Program EIR") and the Los Banos General Plan Land Resources Amendment Subsequent EIR (SCH #2016051033)("GPA SEIR"), and are generally consistent with the anticipated public facilities contemplated in the GP Program EIR/GPA SEIR; therefore it has been determined that this ordinance amendment falls within the scope of the project covered by the GP Program EIR/GP SEIR pursuant to CEQA guidelines section 15162 and is not subject to further environmental review.
2 380
Section 6. This Ordinance shall go into effect and be in full force and operation sixty (60) days after its final passage and adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be posted and published once within fifteen days after passage and adoption as may be required by law; or, in the alternative the City Clerk may cause to be published a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the Office of the City Clerk five (5) days prior to the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and, within fifteen days after adoption, the City Clerk shall cause to be published, the aforementioned summary and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, together with the vote for and against the same, in the Office of the City Clerk.

Introduced by Council Member Lewis and seconded by Council Member Jones on the 15th day of January, 2020.

Passed on the 5th day of February, 2020 by the following vote:

AYES: Council Members Faria, Johnson-Santos, Jones, Lewis, Mayor Villalta
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
APPROVED· .•
. ~/~UATTEST:
~-1- ~
Lucille L. Mallonee, City Clerk
3 381

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
382
LOsBanos
Al tl1c Crossroads c~f C,difornia
Agenda Staff Report
TO: Mayor Pro T em & City Council Members
FROM:

DATE:

Soknirorn Than, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engine~ \L_-_ October 19, 2022
TYPE OF REPORT: Informational Item
SUBJECT: Annual Presentation by Mid-Valley Disposal. LLC Recommendation:

This is an informational item only and no action is to be taken.

Background:

The City Council, on November 4, 2020, approved a contract with Mid Valley Disposal, LLC, for residential and commercial garbage, recyclable materials and organic waste collection services. The contract became effective on July 1, 2021 .

Discussion:

There will be a presentation by Jay Fowler, District Manager of Mid-Valley Disposal, LLC, to update the City Council on the annual report.
383

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
384
TO:

FROM:

DATE:

LOsBanos
OJ ,l ti I h
Agenda Staff Report
Mayor Pro Tern & City Council Members
Gregory B. Wellman, Interim City Manager
October 19, 2022
SUBJECT: Potential Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Local Water Issues TYPE OF REPORT: Agenda Item
Recommendation:

To engage in discussion with Parties of potential future Memorandum of Understanding on the City's water issues. A draft of potential Memorandum of Understanding is not being brought forth to Council for discussion or consideration at this time. Should the Council desire, direction may be provided to staff and the Parties may return with a drafted Memorandum of Understanding or Operational Agreement for further consideration.

Background:

In addition to positions in County and City Government, the Interim City Manager has been the Chief Executive of three water districts in the Central Valley within the last ten years.

As such, he has developed a keen interest in and awareness of water issues of all types including wastewater, storm water, recycled water and fresh water (drinking water).

The Interim City Manager has recently met with three engineering firms on a pro bona basis to secure their perspectives on the City's water issues.

The City has been approached by three local water entities seeking a Memorandum of Understanding or Operating Agreement to increase the volume of usable water within the City of Los Banos. If this collaboration is possible, it will likely result in a Memorandum of Understanding or a similar operating agreement that will benefit the City of Los Banos now and in the future.

GBW/lm
385

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
386
LOsBanos
=-== .. - j~ - [

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Date: October 14, 2022
Regarding: Notice of Public Hearing
Proposal: Cottage Food Operation #2022-04- 745 Vermont Ave.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a Public Hearing will be held by the Los Banos Planning Commission to consider a Categorical Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to Section 15301, Existing Facilities, and Cottage Food Operation #2022-04 for Jacqueline Morfin at 7 45 Vermont Ave., more specifically identified as Assessor's Parcel Number: 027- 011-016.

A PUBLIC HEARING on this matter will be held at the next scheduled meeting of the Los Banos Planning Commission on Wednesday, October 26, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of Los Banos City Hall, located at 520 "J" Street, Los Banos, California. Questions regarding the above-referenced item may be directed to Rudy Luquin, Associate Planner, at City Hall or at (209) 827-2432.

All persons are invited to be present at the public hearing. Written and oral testimony is invited. Notice is hereby further given that if you challenge the above described Project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Additional information may be obtained from the Community & Economic Development Department at 520 J Street, Los Banos, California. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (209) 827-7000. Notification at least 72 hours prior to the public hearing will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to allow participation at this hearing 387

Los Banos City CouncilOctober 19, 2022

Los Banos City Council
October 19, 2022