Agenda packet — Los Gatos City Council, August 11, 2026 (part 3 of 10)

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Arborist Report Tree Preservation Plan
Shawn Taylor, HMH Landscape Architect
HMH Engineers
1570 Oakland Road, San Jose, CA 95131
Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10
TreeIDExisting
Tree
Tag
Numbe
SPP DBH_IN CIRC
_IN
HEIGHT
_FT
SPREAD
N/S_FT
SPREAD
E/W_FT
Species
Rate To
Const
Impact

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
241 180 Quercus lobata 34.0 106.8 35 24 25 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 17 42.5 MODERATE SAVE 242 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 30 18 23 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 243 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 25 15 12 X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 244 Quercus lobata 20.5 64.4 28 16 22 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 10.25 25.6 MODERATE SAVE 245 184 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 15 6 12 X X 4 2 3.0 M 3.0 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 246 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 31 16 28 X X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 247 186 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 32 20 27 X X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 248 187 Olea europaea 17.0 53.4 28 20 32 X Dead Limbs EXEMPT 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 249 Quercus lobata 30.0 94.2 30 22 30 X Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 15 37.5 LOW SAVE 250 189 Olea europaea 7.0 22.0 27 20 18 X EXEMPT 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 3.5 8.8 MODERATE SAVE 251 Olea europaea 10.0 31.4 25 10 30 Future Root Problems EXEMPT 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 252 193 Olea europaea 8.0 25.1 16 18 15 Dead Wood EXEMPT 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 253 192 Olea europaea 18.0 56.5 24 30 40 EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 254 191 Olea europaea 14.0 44.0 24 30 34 X EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 255 190 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 34 18 22 X X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 256 196 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 27 8 18 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 257 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 26 15 12 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 258 194 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 33 11 20 X Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 259 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 28 15 13 X Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 260 Quercus lobata 25.0 78.5 32 27 25 X Poor Tree Structure X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 12.5 31.3 MODERATE SAVE 261 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 25 18 26 X Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 8.5 21.3 LOW SAVE 262 404 Quercus lobata 23.0 72.3 33 31 36 X X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 11.5 28.8 MODERATE SAVE 263 403 Quercus lobata 34.0 106.8 36 30 16 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 17 42.5 LOW SAVE 264 198 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 33 12 20 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 7.5 18.8 MODERATE SAVE 265 197 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 29 17 15 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 266 410 Quercus agrifolia 17.0 53.4 36 25 27 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 267 411 Quercus lobata 25.0 78.5 28 15 13 Dead Wood X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 12.5 31.3 MODERATE SAVE 268 409 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 27 15 22 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 269 417 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 28 13 15 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 270 418 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 31 26 17 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 271 420 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 31 20 17 Dead Wood X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 8 20.0 MODERATE SAVE 272 412 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 28 6 15 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 273 414 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 31 18 22 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 274 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 33 15 20 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 275 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 32 18 26 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 276 199 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 31 21 22 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 277 202 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 22 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 6 15.0 LOW REMOVE 278 599 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 36 45 40 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10 25.0 HIGH OFF-SITE 279 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 25 13 6 Dead Wood X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 280 204 Quercus lobata 8.0 25.1 24 5 13 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 281 Umbellularia californica 8.0 25.1 31 20 24 X 5 5 5.0 M 4.0 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 282 207 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 33 8 12 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 283 208 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 36 13 18 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 284 209 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 34 8 21 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 285 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 34 7 8 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 8 20.0 LOW SAVE 286 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 38 12 10 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 8 20.0 LOW SAVE 287 216 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 28 10 17 Leaning Tree X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 4.5 11.3 LOW SAVE 288 421 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 27 10 20 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 7 17.5 LOW SAVE McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 15

Page 277 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
289 422 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 35 28 30 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 11 27.5 HIGH SAVE 290 423 Pinus halepensis 7.0 22.0 25 12 15 X 5 4 4.5 M-G 4.3 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 291 Pinus halepensis 4.0 12.6 25 5 4 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 2 5.0 HIGH SAVE 292 Pinus halepensis 10.0 31.4 30 17 14 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 293 Quercus lobata 10.0 31.4 20 10 17 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 5 12.5 LOW REMOVE 294 Pinus halepensis 8.0 25.1 25 18 16 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 295 428 Quercus lobata 20.0 62.8 26 27 25 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 10 25.0 MODERATE SAVE 296 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 28 13 10 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 297 497 Pinus halepensis 14.0 44.0 35 20 24 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 298 496 Pinus halepensis 13.0 40.8 32 20 13 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 299 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 35 28 24 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 300 491 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 28 26 17 Poor Tree Structure X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 301 Calocedrus decurrens 10.0 31.4 23 12 10 X 5 5 5.0 M 4.0 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 302 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 17 8 8 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 303 456 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 17 6 5 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 3.5 8.8 LOW REMOVE 304 457 Calocedrus decurrens 15.0 47.1 21 10 12 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 305 458 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 15 8 10 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 3.5 8.8 MODERATE SAVE 306 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 15 10 5 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE SAVE 307 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 10 5 4 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3.5 8.8 LOW SAVE 308 454 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 11.0 34.6 30 10 18 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 309 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 12.0 37.7 30 12 10 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 310 462 Calocedrus decurrens 8.0 25.1 18 12 8 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 311 464 Calocedrus decurrens 8.0 25.1 15 10 9 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 312 463 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 18 6 8 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 313 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 7 6 6 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3 7.5 LOW SAVE 314 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 8 7 7 Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 2.5 6.3 MODERATE SAVE 315 505 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 10 6 4 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3 7.5 LOW SAVE 316 503 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 10.0 31.4 28 6 8 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 317 504 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 11.0 34.6 31 10 8 Dead Wood X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 318 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 10.0 31.4 29 7 5 Poor Tree Structure X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 319 509 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 10 4 6 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 2.5 6.3 LOW SAVE 320 508 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 18 6 6 X 3 4 3.5 M 3.3 3 7.5 MODERATE SAVE 321 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 8 4 5 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 2.5 6.3 MODERATE SAVE 322 Calocedrus decurrens 8.0 25.1 10 6 5 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 323 515 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 12 5 5 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3.5 8.8 LOW SAVE 324 517 Calocedrus decurrens 8.0 25.1 10 8 6 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 325 518 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 8 6 7 Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE SAVE 326 514 Calocedrus decurrens 9.0 28.3 16 8 9 Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 327 513 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 11.0 34.6 31 8 10 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 328 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 11.0 34.6 28 15 12 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 329 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 10 8 6 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 2.5 6.3 MODERATE SAVE 330 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 10 8 5 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE SAVE 331 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 18 8 6 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 3 7.5 HIGH SAVE 332 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 13.0 40.8 28 18 20 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 333 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 12 8 6 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 334 526 Calocedrus decurrens 13.0 40.8 26 12 8 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 335 527 Calocedrus decurrens 5.0 15.7 8 7 3 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 2.5 6.3 MODERATE SAVE 336 528 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 8 4 4 Root Impact X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3 7.5 LOW SAVE McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 16

Page 278 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
337 529 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 12.0 37.7 28 13 14 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 338 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 15.0 47.1 30 20 18 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 339 Calocedrus decurrens 3.0 9.4 10 4 3 EXEMPT 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 1.5 3.8 MODERATE SAVE 340 Calocedrus decurrens 4.0 12.6 15 5 3 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 2 5.0 MODERATE SAVE 341 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 8.0 25.1 25 8 7 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 342 535 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 14.0 44.0 27 12 10 Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 343 Pinus brutia var. eldarica 15.0 47.1 28 15 10 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 344 533 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 15 5 4 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3 7.5 LOW SAVE 345 Calocedrus decurrens 6.0 18.8 10 5 5 Leaning Tree X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 3 7.5 MODERATE SAVE 346 Quercus lobata 21.0 66.0 30 27 22 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 10.5 26.3 MODERATE SAVE 347 Quercus lobata 21.0 66.0 40 24 27 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 10.5 26.3 MODERATE SAVE 348 Quercus douglasii 24.0 75.4 43 40 30 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 12 30.0 HIGH SAVE 349 Quercus douglasii 23.0 72.3 36 35 26 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 11.5 28.8 HIGH SAVE 350 440 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 25 16 18 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 351 214 Olea europaea 14.0 44.0 30 40 45 EXEMPT 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 352 Quercus douglasii 5.0 15.7 25 12 8 Severe Decline X 2 3 2.5 M-G 3.3 2.5 6.3 MODERATE SAVE 353 225 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 20 6 5 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 7 17.5 LOW REMOVE 354 Quercus lobata 10.0 31.4 23 8 18 X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 355 431 Quercus lobata 20.0 62.8 28 33 30 X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 10 25.0 MODERATE SAVE 356 Snag 9.0 28.3 22 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 0 0.0 4.5 0.0 REMOVE 357 443 Quercus douglasii 24.0 75.4 43 24 35 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 12 30.0 HIGH SAVE 358 Quercus lobata 8.0 25.1 15 1 11 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 4 10.0 LOW REMOVE 359 446 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 25 10 6 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 6 15.0 LOW SAVE 360 447 Quercus lobata 25.0 78.5 38 25 24 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 12.5 31.3 MODERATE SAVE 361 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 23 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 9 22.5 LOW REMOVE 362 437 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 30 16 15 Poor Tree Architecture X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 363 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 32 35 36 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 364 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 31 15 13 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 365 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 35 22 10 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE OFF-SITE 366 210 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 15 12 27 Excessive Limb Weight X 4 2 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 367 211 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 46 16 15 Dead Limbs X 4 2 3.0 M 3.0 8 20.0 MODERATE SAVE 368 213 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 32 26 22 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 369 212 Quercus agrifolia 19.0 59.7 32 23 28 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 370 219 Snag 7.0 22.0 5 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 0 0.0 3.5 0.0 REMOVE 371 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 50 15 12 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 372 221 Quercus lobata 8.0 25.1 43 12 15 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 373 Snag 8.0 25.1 22 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 0 0.0 4 0.0 REMOVE 374 220 Olea europaea 18.0 56.5 38 23 20 EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 375 223 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 26 28 23 Dead Wood X 3 4 3.5 M 3.3 9 22.5 MODERATE SAVE 376 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 22 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 G 3.0 10 25.0 MODERATE REMOVE 377 Quercus agrifolia 30.0 94.2 35 45 35 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 15 37.5 HIGH SAVE 378 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 22 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 4.5 11.3 LOW REMOVE 379 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 14 2 10 Dead X 1 1 1.0 G 3.0 5 12.5 MODERATE REMOVE 380 Pinus halepensis 13.0 40.8 34 13 18 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 381 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 25 23 15 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 382 Quercus douglasii 23.0 72.3 36 43 50 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 11.5 28.8 HIGH SAVE 383 Pinus halepensis 5.0 15.7 21 12 5 Co-Dominant Lead X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 384 Pinus halepensis 11.0 34.6 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 10 20 10 X 4 2 3.0 M-G 3.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 17

Page 279 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
385 Quercus agrifolia 22.0 69.1 26 10 36 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 G 3.5 11 27.5 HIGH SAVE 386 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 20 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 7.5 18.8 LOW REMOVE 387 Quercus douglasii 22.0 69.1 30 30 20 Sites of Decay X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 388 Quercus douglasii 11.0 34.6 20 6 17 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 389 Quercus douglasii 8.0 25.1 22 8 14 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 390 Quercus douglasii 20.0 62.8 33 20 30 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 10 25.0 HIGH SAVE 391 439 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 28 20 15 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 392 230 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 34 21 20 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 393 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 27 10 20 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 394 234 Quercus douglasii 12.0 37.7 33 22 18 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 6 15.0 HIGH OFF-SITE 395 235 Quercus douglasii 10.0 31.4 22 15 12 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 5 12.5 HIGH OFF-SITE 396 Quercus douglasii 13.0 40.8 22 14 10 Severe Decline X 4 2 3.0 M-G 3.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 397 Quercus douglasii 13.0 40.8 31 18 13 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 398 236 Quercus douglasii 27.0 84.8 42 43 40 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 13.5 33.8 HIGH SAVE 399 Quercus douglasii 21.0 66.0 35 20 25 Sites of Decay X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 400 Quercus douglasii 15.0 47.1 36 24 20 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 401 Quercus douglasii 10.0 31.4 30 20 13 Leaning Tree X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 402 Quercus douglasii 13.0 40.8 39 20 18 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 403 Quercus douglasii 22.0 69.1 45 22 24 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 404 Quercus douglasii 19.0 59.7 36 30 24 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 405 Quercus lobata 10.0 31.4 25 10 8 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 5 12.5 LOW SAVE 406 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 25 4 10 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 6 15.0 LOW SAVE 407 Quercus douglasii 15.0 47.1 36 20 30 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 7.5 18.8 MODERATE SAVE 408 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 34 27 40 Poor Tree Structure X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 409 Quercus douglasii 18.0 56.5 32 27 33 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 410 Quercus douglasii 17.0 53.4 37 20 25 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 411 Quercus douglasii 16.0 50.3 30 17 23 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 412 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 33 25 30 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8 20.0 MODERATE SAVE 413 481 Quercus lobata 8.0 25.1 24 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 4 10.0 LOW REMOVE 414 Quercus douglasii 19.0 59.7 37 26 30 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 415 Quercus douglasii 23.0 72.3 32 28 24 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 11.5 28.8 HIGH SAVE 416 489 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 30 17 22 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 417 488 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 28 30 33 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 418 Quercus douglasii 23.0 72.3 38 22 27 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 11.5 28.8 HIGH SAVE 419 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 34 15 13 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 420 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 26 15 12 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 421 485 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 27 13 15 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 7.5 18.8 LOW SAVE 422 Quercus lobata 28.0 88.0 42 44 28 Dead Limbs X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 14 35.0 MODERATE SAVE 423 Quercus lobata 28.0 88.0 35 20 40 Dead Limbs X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 14 35.0 MODERATE SAVE 424 486 Quercus douglasii 21.0 66.0 23 30 18 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 425 Quercus douglasii 21.0 66.0 38 24 23 Leaning Tree X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 426 Quercus douglasii 7.0 22.0 20 12 8 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 427 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 32 23 23 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 428 Quercus douglasii 25.0 78.5 41 30 35 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 12.5 31.3 HIGH SAVE 429 473 Quercus douglasii 16.0 50.3 28 15 18 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 430 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 33 22 15 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 9 22.5 MODERATE SAVE 431 Quercus lobata 8.0 25.1 29 13 15 Severe Decline X 2 3 2.5 M 2.8 4 10.0 MODERATE SAVE 432 291 Quercus douglasii 12.0 37.7 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 33 15 12 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 18

Page 280 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
433 290 Quercus douglasii 18.0 56.5 36 25 27 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 434 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 28 34 12 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 435 285 Quercus agrifolia 25.0 78.5 38 34 37 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 12.5 31.3 HIGH SAVE 436 286 Quercus douglasii 16.0 50.3 40 22 20 X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 437 288 Quercus douglasii 15.0 47.1 36 27 17 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 438 Quercus douglasii 7.0 22.0 25 4 12 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 439 289 Quercus douglasii 12.0 37.7 36 10 8 X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 440 Quercus douglasii 22.0 69.1 29 15 27 Sites of Decay X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 441 Prunus domestica 5.0 15.7 10 1 1 Drought Stress EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 2.5 6.3 LOW SAVE 442 241 Quercus agrifolia 24.0 75.4 37 36 40 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 12 30.0 HIGH SAVE 443 242 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 31 21 18 Poor Tree Structure X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 444 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 30 26 12 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 7 17.5 LOW REMOVE 445 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 36 30 26 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10 25.0 HIGH SAVE 446 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 38 24 23 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 447 246 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 38 30 27 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10 25.0 HIGH SAVE 448 Quercus douglasii 15.0 47.1 41 27 30 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 449 248 Quercus douglasii 16.0 50.3 38 24 16 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 8 20.0 MODERATE SAVE 450 Quercus douglasii 14.0 44.0 30 23 31 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 451 302 Quercus douglasii 28.0 88.0 47 33 35 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 14 35.0 HIGH SAVE 452 Quercus agrifolia 27.0 84.8 35 40 40 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 13.5 33.8 HIGH SAVE 453 304 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 28 16 13 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 454 Quercus agrifolia 26.0 81.7 35 30 30 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 13 32.5 HIGH SAVE 455 Snag 16.0 50.3 8 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 0 0.0 8 0.0 REMOVE 456 258 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 45 35 30 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 10 25.0 HIGH SAVE 457 Quercus douglasii 16.0 50.3 45 30 20 X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 458 252 Quercus douglasii 11.0 34.6 35 15 18 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 5.5 13.8 MODERATE SAVE 459 254 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 45 23 30 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 G 3.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 460 249 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 36 38 30 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 461 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 27 35 20 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 462 253 Quercus agrifolia 14.0 44.0 38 22 23 X 4 5 4.5 G 4.8 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 463 Quercus agrifolia 5.0 15.7 15 10 10 Crowded Growing Conditions X 3 4 3.5 G 4.3 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 464 255 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 30 22 20 Poor Tree Structure X 4 2 3.0 G 4.0 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 465 256 Quercus agrifolia 32.0 100.5 47 38 37 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 16 40.0 HIGH SAVE 466 260 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 31 18 22 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 467 259 Quercus agrifolia 11.0 34.6 38 15 24 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 468 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 26 15 15 X 3 4 3.5 G 4.3 4.5 11.3 HIGH SAVE 469 Not Used 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 SAVE
470 Quercus lobata 3.0 9.4 23 6 5 Severe Decline EXEMPT 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 1.5 3.8 LOW SAVE 471 540 Quercus agrifolia 14.0 44.0 30 16 13 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 472 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 21 10 12 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 2 5.0 HIGH SAVE 473 541 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 40 28 20 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 474 543 Quercus agrifolia 13.0 40.8 40 18 15 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 475 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 37 10 13 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 476 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 40 21 20 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 477 Quercus agrifolia 11.0 34.6 30 15 13 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 478 546 Quercus agrifolia 11.0 34.6 28 18 15 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 5.5 13.8 HIGH SAVE 479 263 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 31 26 20 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 480 545 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 31 15 12 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 19

Page 281 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
481 Quercus lobata 4.0 12.6 25 8 3 Crowded Growing Conditions X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 2 5.0 MODERATE SAVE 482 Quercus agrifolia 7.0 22.0 21 10 8 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 483 547 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 42 24 23 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 484 548 Quercus agrifolia 18.0 56.5 36 45 37 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 485 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 26 20 18 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH SAVE 486 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 24 27 15 Weak Crotch X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 487 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 31 24 18 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 488 Heteromeles arbutifolia 4.0 12.6 15 15 15 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 2 5.0 LOW SAVE 489 265 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 28 22 17 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 8 20.0 HIGH SAVE 490 Quercus agrifolia 36.0 113.1 55 36 40 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 18 45.0 HIGH SAVE 491 269 Quercus agrifolia 18.0 56.5 33 30 28 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 492 270 Quercus agrifolia 27.0 84.8 51 35 33 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 13.5 33.8 HIGH SAVE 493 271 Quercus agrifolia 13.0 40.8 23 18 17 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 6.5 16.3 HIGH SAVE 494 274 Quercus agrifolia 32.0 100.5 40 35 46 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 16 40.0 HIGH SAVE 495 273 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 45 30 35 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8.5 21.3 MODERATE SAVE 496 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 24 18 15 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 4.5 11.3 LOW SAVE 497 279 Quercus lobata 10.0 31.4 30 15 22 X 3 4 3.5 M 3.3 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 498 293 Quercus agrifolia 17.0 53.4 34 30 28 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 499 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 26 28 26 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 500 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 27 23 15 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6 15.0 MODERATE SAVE 501 278 Quercus agrifolia 26.0 81.7 37 55 60 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 13 32.5 HIGH SAVE 502 Quercus agrifolia 24.0 75.4 40 26 30 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 12 30.0 HIGH SAVE 503 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 35 20 15 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 7.5 18.8 HIGH SAVE 504 280 Quercus agrifolia 27.0 84.8 33 30 35 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 13.5 33.8 HIGH SAVE 505 294 Quercus lobata 10.0 31.4 37 18 22 Severe Decline X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 5 12.5 MODERATE SAVE 506 Quercus lobata 14.0 44.0 37 23 27 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 7 17.5 MODERATE SAVE 507 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 40 35 27 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8 20.0 MODERATE SAVE 508 Quercus agrifolia 17.0 53.4 30 50 45 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 509 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 7 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 5.5 13.8 LOW REMOVE 510 307 Quercus lobata 6.0 18.8 22 13 10 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 3 7.5 MODERATE REMOVE 511 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 37 26 30 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9.5 23.8 MODERATE SAVE 512 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 40 25 27 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6.5 16.3 MODERATE SAVE 513 Quercus agrifolia 3.0 9.4 16 3 5 EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 1.5 3.8 HIGH REMOVE 514 306 Quercus lobata 7.0 22.0 33 5 6 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE REMOVE 515 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 5 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 G 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE REMOVE 516 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 33 18 13 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 517 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 28 15 10 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 518 310 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 32 18 15 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9 22.5 MODERATE REMOVE 519 Quercus agrifolia 5.0 15.7 10 8 7 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 520 568 Prunus dulcis 8.0 25.1 15 8 12 Dead EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 4 10.0 LOW REMOVE 521 Quercus douglasii 7.0 22.0 26 13 6 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE REMOVE 522 315 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 27 20 15 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 523 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 24 1 1 Dead X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 5.5 13.8 LOW REMOVE 524 314 Quercus agrifolia 6.0 18.8 15 13 10 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 3 7.5 HIGH REMOVE 525 Quercus agrifolia 3.0 9.4 20 3 5 EXEMPT 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 1.5 3.8 HIGH REMOVE 526 313 Quercus lobata 7.0 22.0 15 1 1 Dead Wood X 1 1 1.0 M 2.0 3.5 8.8 LOW SAVE 527 328 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 23 8 13 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 528 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 23 10 10 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 5 12.5 HIGH REMOVE 20

Page 282 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
529 Quercus agrifolia 5.0 15.7 18 10 5 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 530 326 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 36 28 26 Remove for Easement Conflict X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9 22.5 MODERATE REMOVE 531 325 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 38 12 23 Remove for Easement Conflict X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6 15.0 HIGH REMOVE 532 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 31 15 13 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 533 317 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 32 22 12 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 4.5 11.3 HIGH SAVE 534 318 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 32 16 10 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6 15.0 MODERATE REMOVE 535 319 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 28 15 12 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 536 320 Olea europaea 5.0 15.7 31 18 13 EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 2.5 6.3 HIGH REMOVE 537 Olea europaea 4.0 12.6 16 18 16 EXEMPT 4 2 3.0 M 3.0 2 5.0 MODERATE REMOVE 538 321 Olea europaea 4.0 12.6 36 20 18 EXEMPT 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 2 5.0 HIGH REMOVE 539 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 15 10 10 X 3 3 3.0 G 4.0 2 5.0 HIGH SAVE 540 322 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 35 26 28 Poor Tree Structure X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 6.5 16.3 MODERATE REMOVE 541 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 50 33 27 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE REMOVE 542 587 Quercus agrifolia 7.0 22.0 22 6 13 X 3 2 2.5 G 3.8 3.5 8.8 HIGH REMOVE 543 329 Quercus lobata 4.0 12.6 24 1 1 Severe Decline X 2 1 1.5 M 2.3 2 5.0 LOW REMOVE 544 330 Quercus agrifolia 7.0 22.0 32 8 6 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH REMOVE 545 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 34 1 2 Severe Decline X 2 1 1.5 M 2.3 6.5 16.3 LOW REMOVE 546 334 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 28 12 10 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4 10.0 HIGH REMOVE 547 333 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 42 23 20 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 7.5 18.8 HIGH REMOVE 548 Quercus lobata 11.0 34.6 38 12 8 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 5.5 13.8 LOW REMOVE 549 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 36 20 20 Dead Wood X 2 3 2.5 M 2.8 7.5 18.8 MODERATE REMOVE 550 301 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 22 20 20 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 551 343 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 40 34 30 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 8.5 21.3 MODERATE REMOVE 552 Olea europaea 4.0 12.6 17 18 23 EXEMPT 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 2 5.0 MODERATE REMOVE 553 344 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 28 16 15 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6 15.0 HIGH REMOVE 554 609 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 25 13 11 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4 10.0 HIGH REMOVE 555 345 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 31 20 18 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 556 346 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 42 25 25 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 7.5 18.8 MODERATE REMOVE 557 347 Quercus lobata 18.0 56.5 30 28 31 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9 22.5 MODERATE REMOVE 558 348 Quercus lobata 13.0 40.8 27 24 22 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 6.5 16.3 MODERATE REMOVE 559 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 34 12 6 Severe Decline X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE REMOVE 560 Quercus lobata 16.0 50.3 41 27 18 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8 20.0 MODERATE REMOVE 561 Olea europaea 8.0 25.1 26 23 20 Severe Decline EXEMPT 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 4 10.0 LOW REMOVE 562 Quercus lobata 26.0 81.7 48 35 40 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 13 32.5 HIGH REMOVE 563 338 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 30 28 22 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 564 341 Quercus lobata 28.0 88.0 44 40 46 X 3 4 3.5 M 3.3 14 35.0 MODERATE REMOVE 565 Quercus lobata 17.0 53.4 42 15 23 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 8.5 21.3 MODERATE REMOVE 566 340 Quercus agrifolia 36.0 113.1 42 38 32 Remove for Easement Conflict X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 18 45.0 HIGH SAVE 567 352 Quercus lobata 19.0 59.7 40 30 33 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 9.5 23.8 MODERATE REMOVE 568 353 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 46 30 25 Dead Wood X 3 4 3.5 M 3.3 11 27.5 MODERATE REMOVE 569 Quercus lobata 35.0 110.0 42 30 30 X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 17.5 43.8 MODERATE SAVE 570 352 Pyrus calleryana 7.0 22.0 23 13 10 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 3.5 8.8 LOW REMOVE 571 355 Quercus agrifolia 13.0 40.8 35 20 21 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH REMOVE 572 610 Quercus agrifolia 11.0 34.6 24 23 25 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 5.5 13.8 HIGH REMOVE 573 356 Quercus lobata 21.0 66.0 44 36 30 Dead Wood X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 10.5 26.3 MODERATE REMOVE 574 Quercus agrifolia 13.0 40.8 31 25 28 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6.5 16.3 HIGH REMOVE 575 Sambucus neomexicana 14.0 44.0 26 25 15 Previous Limb Failure X 2 2 2.0 G 3.5 7 17.5 HIGH REMOVE 576 Quercus agrifolia 11.0 34.6 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 40 10 20 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 5.5 13.8 HIGH REMOVE 21

Page 283 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
577 85 Quercus agrifolia 38.0 119.4 48 40 42 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 19 47.5 HIGH REMOVE 578 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 28 13 16 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 579 84 Sambucus neomexicana 10.0 31.4 31 27 23 Poor Tree Structure X 2 2 2.0 G 3.5 5 12.5 HIGH SAVE 580 82 Platanus racemosa 27.0 84.8 43 20 45 Sites of Decay X 3 2 2.5 M-G 3.3 13.5 33.8 MODERATE SAVE 581 Platanus racemosa 34.0 106.8 47 25 30 X 5 4 4.5 M-G 4.3 17 42.5 HIGH SAVE 582 Platanus racemosa 34.0 106.8 60 26 40 X 5 4 4.5 M-G 4.3 17 42.5 HIGH SAVE 583 Platanus racemosa 36.0 113.1 45 30 27 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 18 45.0 HIGH SAVE 584 Calocedrus decurrens 7.0 22.0 26 10 12 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 585 Platanus racemosa 7.0 22.0 40 15 12 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 586 Platanus racemosa 31.0 97.4 50 40 40 Leaning Tree X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 15.5 38.8 HIGH SAVE 587 Quercus lobata 23.0 72.3 65 38 36 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 11.5 28.8 HIGH SAVE 588 Sequoia sempervirens 5.0 15.7 30 18 18 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 2.5 6.3 HIGH SAVE 589 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 18 12 10 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 2 5.0 HIGH SAVE 590 Washingtonia robusta 22.0 69.1 40 10 10 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 11 27.5 HIGH SAVE 591 Prunus dulcis 7.0 22.0 20 10 6 Dead Wood EXEMPT 2 2 2.0 P-M 2.0 3.5 8.8 LOW REMOVE 592 1 Quercus agrifolia 13.0 40.8 28 28 30 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 6.5 16.3 HIGH REMOVE 593 2 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 26 15 20 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 594 349 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 28 22 26 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 8 20.0 HIGH REMOVE 595 350 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 27 17 21 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 6 15.0 HIGH REMOVE 596 351 Quercus agrifolia 15.0 47.1 27 20 24 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 7.5 18.8 HIGH REMOVE 597 567 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 42 33 37 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10.5 26.3 HIGH REMOVE 598 566 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 25 16 32 Crowded Growing Conditions X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 11 27.5 MODERATE REMOVE 599 565 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 47 34 32 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 10 25.0 HIGH REMOVE 600 564 Quercus agrifolia 22.0 69.1 42 35 33 Dead Limbs X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 11 27.5 HIGH REMOVE 601 563 Quercus agrifolia 27.0 84.8 30 28 26 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 13.5 33.8 HIGH REMOVE 602 562 Quercus agrifolia 18.0 56.5 30 30 27 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 9 22.5 HIGH REMOVE 603 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 16 10 8 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 4.5 11.3 HIGH REMOVE 604 Pyrus calleryana 5.0 15.7 7 10 5 Severe Decline X 2 2 2.0 M 2.5 2.5 6.3 LOW REMOVE 605 Olea europaea 3.0 9.4 7 10 6 EXEMPT 5 4 4.5 M 3.8 1.5 3.8 HIGH REMOVE 606 109 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 31 35 33 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 10.5 26.3 HIGH REMOVE 607 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 16 10 10 Severe Decline X 1 2 1.5 G 3.3 2 5.0 MODERATE REMOVE 608 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 16 10 10 Severe Decline X 1 2 1.5 G 3.3 2 5.0 MODERATE REMOVE 609 Quercus agrifolia 5.0 15.7 16 10 10 Severe Decline X 1 2 1.5 G 3.3 2.5 6.3 MODERATE REMOVE 610 Quercus douglasii 21.0 66.0 36 28 25 Dead Wood X 4 4 4.0 M-G 4.0 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 611 111 Quercus agrifolia 21.0 66.0 32 37 33 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 10.5 26.3 HIGH SAVE 612 Quercus lobata 22.0 69.1 34 38 28 Dead Wood X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 11 27.5 MODERATE SAVE 613 560 Quercus douglasii 12.0 37.7 34 25 23 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M-G 3.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 614 559 Quercus agrifolia 19.0 59.7 34 27 23 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 615 555 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 28 12 10 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 616 557 Quercus agrifolia 7.0 22.0 27 5 4 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 617 556 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 25 6 8 Crowded Growing Conditions X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH SAVE 618 Quercus agrifolia 18.0 56.5 37 22 24 Co-Dominant Lead X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 619 Quercus agrifolia 18.0 56.5 30 20 40 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 9 22.5 HIGH SAVE 620 553 Quercus agrifolia 14.0 44.0 38 22 23 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 621 Quercus agrifolia 6.0 18.8 35 10 8 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 3 7.5 HIGH SAVE 622 Quercus agrifolia 4.0 12.6 14 10 10 Dead X 1 3 2.0 G 3.5 2 5.0 HIGH REMOVE 623 552 Quercus agrifolia 24.0 75.4 34 30 28 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 12 30.0 HIGH SAVE 624 Olea europaea 4.0 12.6 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 20 10 15 EXEMPT 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 2 5.0 MODERATE SAVE 22

Page 284 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
625 551 Quercus agrifolia 19.0 59.7 36 25 23 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 9.5 23.8 HIGH SAVE 626 550 Quercus douglasii 25.0 78.5 40 28 37 X 4 3 3.5 M-G 3.8 12.5 31.3 HIGH SAVE 627 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 30 12 12 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 6 15.0 HIGH SAVE 628 Quercus agrifolia 6.0 18.8 13 8 8 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 3 7.5 HIGH SAVE 629 Quercus agrifolia 12.0 37.7 16 10 13 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 6 15.0 HIGH REMOVE 630 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 13 7 8 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 4 10.0 HIGH REMOVE 631 548 Quercus agrifolia 17.0 53.4 32 30 33 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 8.5 21.3 HIGH REMOVE 632 134 Quercus lobata 39.0 122.5 45 48 33 Dead Limbs X 4 3 3.5 M 3.3 19.5 48.8 MODERATE SAVE 633 382 Quercus lobata 9.0 28.3 27 8 5 Multiple Leaders X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 4.5 11.3 MODERATE SAVE 634 Quercus agrifolia 7.0 22.0 18 16 20 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 3.5 8.8 HIGH SAVE 635 136 Quercus lobata 12.0 37.7 27 23 16 X 4 4 4.0 M 3.5 6 15.0 HIGH REMOVE 636 Prunus domestica 5.0 15.7 10 12 4 Severe Decline EXEMPT 1 2 1.5 P-M 1.8 2.5 6.3 LOW REMOVE 637 Prunus domestica 4.0 12.6 8 8 4 Severe Decline EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 2 5.0 LOW SAVE 638 Olea europaea 5.0 15.7 15 12 15 EXEMPT 5 5 5.0 M 4.0 2.5 6.3 HIGH REMOVE 639 Prunus domestica 4.0 12.6 6 4 3 Canker EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 2 5.0 LOW SAVE 640 Prunus domestica 3.0 9.4 5 8 8 Dead EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 1.5 3.8 LOW REMOVE 641 Prunus domestica 3.0 9.4 5 8 2 Dead EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 1.5 3.8 LOW REMOVE 642 Prunus domestica 3.0 9.4 8 6 4 Drought Stress EXEMPT 2 1 1.5 P-M 1.8 1.5 3.8 LOW REMOVE 643 142 Prunus domestica 4.0 12.6 7 4 4 Canker EXEMPT 2 1 1.5 P-M 1.8 2 5.0 LOW REMOVE 644 Quercus agrifolia 14.0 44.0 15 17 22 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 7 17.5 HIGH SAVE 645 Prunus domestica 5.0 15.7 16 8 20 Dead EXEMPT 1 2 1.5 P-M 1.8 2.5 6.3 LOW REMOVE 646 Quercus agrifolia 8.0 25.1 15 13 20 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 4 10.0 HIGH SAVE 647 Prunus dulcis 9.0 28.3 16 15 13 Dead EXEMPT 1 1 1.0 P-M 1.5 4.5 11.3 LOW REMOVE 648 Phoenix dactylifera 44.0 138.2 24 20 25 X 5 5 5.0 M-G 4.5 22 55.0 HIGH OFF-SITE 649 572 Juniperus chinensis 23.0 72.3 24 22 21 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 11.5 28.8 HIGH OFF-SITE 650 299 Quercus agrifolia 28.0 88.0 62 60 40 X 5 5 5.0 G 5.0 14 35.0 HIGH SAVE 651 Quercus agrifolia 17.0 53.4 26 30 28 X 5 4 4.5 G 4.8 8.5 21.3 HIGH SAVE 652 Quercus lobata 15.0 47.1 26 15 15 X 3 2 2.5 M 2.8 7.5 18.8 MODERATE SAVE 653 Stump 9.0 28.3 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 4.5 11.3 #VALUE! SAVE 654 59 Stump 6.0 18.8 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 3 7.5 #VALUE! SAVE 655 53 Stump 6.0 18.8 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 3 7.5 #VALUE! SAVE 656 60 Stump 6.0 18.8 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 3 7.5 #VALUE! SAVE 657 57 Stump 15.0 47.1 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 7.5 18.8 #VALUE! SAVE 658 578 Stump 11.0 34.6 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 5.5 13.8 #VALUE! SAVE 659 Stump 17.0 53.4 1 0 0 Possible PG&E removal X 1 1 1.0 0 #VALUE! 8.5 21.3 #VALUE! SAVE 660 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 50 35 35 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10 25.0 HIGH REMOVE 661 Quercus agrifolia 20.0 62.8 40 30 30 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 10 25.0 HIGH OFF SITE 662 Quercus agrifolia 22.0 69.1 68 30 25 Leaning Tree X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 11 27.5 HIGH OFF SITE 663 Aesculus californica 7.0 22.0 28 30 15 X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 3.5 8.8 HIGH OFF SITE 664 Quercus lobata 45.0 141.4 73 62 65 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 22.5 56.3 MODERATE OFF SITE 665 Quercus agrifolia 24.0 75.4 68 40 40 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 12 30.0 HIGH OFF SITE 666 Quercus agrifolia 16.0 50.3 50 35 35 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 8 20.0 HIGH OFF SITE 667 Magnolia grandiflora 7.0 22.0 17 10 13 City Street Tree X 2 2 2.0 M-G 3.0 3.5 8.8 MODERATE REMOVE 668 Quercus lobata 6.0 18.8 24 8 15 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3 7.5 MODERATE OFF-SITE 669 Quercus agrifolia 10.0 31.4 25 16 20 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 5 12.5 HIGH OFF-SITE 670 590 Pinus radiata 50.0 157.1 50 36 36 Dead Limbs, Severed roots on Project X 2 3 2.5 M-G 3.3 25 62.5 MODERATE SAVE 671 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 19 15 15 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH OFF-SITE 672 Eucalyptus globulus 25.0 78.5 McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 45 15 33 Severe Decline X 1 3 2.0 M 2.5 12.5 31.3 LOW OFF-SITE 23

Page 285 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

NOTE PROTECTED LARGE

PROTECTED
HEALTH
RATING
STRUCT
URE
RATING
COND
OVRL
RATING
Tolerance
Rate To
Const
Impact
COND
OVRL w
Const
Impact
CRZ_FT
_RADIU
S
TPZ_FT_
RADIUS
DBH
x15

RETENTION
RATING
SAVE,

REMOVE,

OFF-SITE
673 Quercus agrifolia 9.0 28.3 17 15 16 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 4.5 11.3 HIGH OFF-SITE 674 Quercus lobata 6.0 18.8 17 10 12 X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 3 7.5 MODERATE OFF-SITE 675 Quercus agrifolia 30.0 94.2 32 30 50 Leaning Tree X 4 3 3.5 G 4.3 15 37.5 HIGH SAVE 676 598 Quercus agrifolia 34.0 106.8 36 50 50 X 4 4 4.0 G 4.5 17 42.5 HIGH OFF-SITE 677 Quercus lobata 40.0 125.7 50 50 40 Dead Limbs X 3 3 3.0 M 3.0 20 50.0 MODERATE OFF-SITE McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 24

Page 286 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Arborist Report Tree Preservation Plan
Site
Shawn Taylor, HMH Landscape Architect Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10 HMH Engineers
1570 Oakland Road, San Jose, CA 95131 TREE COUNT
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COUNT % of Tree Inv TREE SUMMARY Aesculus californica California Buckeye 2 0.3% Protected Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar 53 7.9% Protected
Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress 1 0.1% Protected
Eucalyptus globulus Blue Gum 1 0.1% Protected
Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 1 0.1% Protected
Juglans hindsii California Black Walnut 1 0.1% Protected Juglans regia English Walnut 1 0.1% Exempt
Juniperus chinensis Chinese Juniper 1 0.1% Protected
Ligustrum japonicum Japanese Privet 1 0.1% Protected
Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia 1 0.1% Protected Not Used 4 spaces 0 0.0% N/A
Olea europaea Olive 24 3.6% Exempt
Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm 1 0.1% Protected
Pinus brutia var. eldarica Afghan Pine 28 4.2% Protected Pinus halepensis Aleppo Pine 12 1.8% Protected
Pinus radiata Monterey Pine 1 0.1% Protected
26 Species of trees were identified
22 Protected Species
4 Exempt Species
51 trees are listed as “Off Site”.
37 trees are “Exempt”.
4 spaces are labeled "not used”
5 "Snag" Dead tree that can not be identifiable
7 “stumps” are recorded.
32 ”Dead” trees are recorded.
561 "Protected" Trees
69 "Large Protected" Trees
43 "Exempt" Tree
244 trees to be removed
371 trees to be retained
211 "Protected" trees recommended for removal
12 "Large Protected" trees recommended for removal
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore 6 0.9% Protected
Prunus domestica Plum 9 1.3% Exempt
Prunus dulcis Almond 3 0.4% Exempt
Pyrus calleryana Ornamental Pear 2 0.3% Protected
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 254 37.7% Protected
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak 49 7.3% Protected
Quercus lobata Valley Oak 204 30.3% Protected
Sambucus neomexicana Blue Elderberry 2 0.3% Protected
Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood 1 0.1% Protected
Snag not be identifiable 5 0.7% N/A
Stump not be identifiable 7 1.0% N/A
Umbellularia californica California Bay 1 0.1% Protected Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm 1 0.1% Protected
Total 673 100.0%
Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008, [email protected] 25

Page 287 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 December 15, 2024 28

Page 288 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 29

Page 289 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
A
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 30

Page 290 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
B
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 31

Page 291 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
C
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 32

Page 292 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
D
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 33

Page 293 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
E
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 34

Page 294 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
F
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 December 15, 2024 35

Page 295 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
G
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Sey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 December 15, 2024 Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 36

Page 296 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

DeltaCad DEMO
H
Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 37

Page 297 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

LEGEND OF ABBREVIATIONS
BBS - Bark Beetle Strike EP - Environmental Impact PTA - Poor Tree Architecture CBL - Cable Installed FB - Fire blight PTS - Poor Tree Structure CDL - Co-Dominant Leaders FC - Fungal Conk RDC - Reduce CGC - Crowded Growing Conditions FRP - Future Root Problems RI - Root Impact CHL - Chlorotic GR - Girdling Root RMV - Remove Tree
CNK - Canker IBK - Imbedded Bark RTB - Red Turpentine Beetle CRK - Crack IN - Install New Tree SC - Soil Compaction
CRP - Current Root Problems ITP - Inventory Tag Present (from others) SD - Severe Decline CRS - Crown Restoration LIA - Liability Exposure SDR - Severed Roots CST - City Street Tree LN - Leaning Tree SJS - San Jose Scale DBR - Damaged Buttress Roots LT - Lion's Tailed SOD - Sites of Decay DC - Decay MCH - Mulch SR - Surface Roots
DD - Dead MD - Mower Damage to stem an/or roots SRD - Surface Root Damage DL - Dead Limbs ML - Multiple Leaders STD - Stem Damage DS - Drought Stress NC - New Concrete STR - Structure
DW - Dead Wood NIT - Newly Installed Tree VD - Vehicle Damage EC - Expansion Cracks PH - Previously Headed VW - Verticillium Wilt EI - Excessive Irrigation PLF - Previous Limb Failure WBU - Weak Branch Union ELW - Excessive Limb Weight PPT - Poor Pruning Technique WC - Weak Crotch EF - Entomosporium Fungus causing the spots
DBH “DBH” is defined as the measurement of the diameter of a tree trunk measured at breast height (4.5 feet or 54”-inches from ground).

CRZ Critical Root Zone “CRZ” is 6 times radially the diameter of the DBH. Damage to roots or cutting roots within this area is more likely to compromise stability.

This area shall not be entered in to by anyone without Project Arborist approval.

TPZ Tree Protection Zone “TPZ” is 15 times radially the diameter of the DBH.This area shall be the primary tree protection zone for each tree that has roots or canopy in the work zone.

Unassigned This is an indication that there was no observation made on the trees health or structure Health Structure Construction Impact Rating
5 Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably
free of disease and pests.
5 Best structure and form typical of the
species.

P
M
G
Poor ability to withstand construction impact
Moderate ability to withstand construction
impact Good ability to withstand construction
4 Tree with slight decline in vigor,
small amount of twig dieback.
4 Minor structural defects that could be
corrected.

P-G
M-G
P-M
3 Moderate vigor, moderate twig and
small branch dieback, thinning of
crown, poor leaf color.
3 Moderate structural defects that may or
that might be mitigated with care.
2 In decline, epicormic growth,
extensive dieback of medium to
large branches.
2 Significant structural defects that
cannot be abated.
1 Dead or severe decline, dieback
scaffold branches and or trunk,
mostly epicormic growth.
1 Structural defects that cannot be abated
or dead.

Poor-Good ability to withstand construction impact
Moderate-Good ability to withstand construction impact
Poor- Moderate ability to withstand construction impact McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 38

Page 298 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Arborist Report Tree Preservation Plan
Shawn Taylor, HMH Landscape Architect
Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10
Tree Overall Rating Design considerations Health description Structure description Count % of Inventory Retention Ratring
4 to 5 Worthy of preservation,
condition warrants long-term
preservation.

Healthy, vigorous tree,
reasonably free of disease and
pests. Tree with slight decline
in vigor, small amount of twig
dieback.

Best structure and form typical of
the species or minor structural
defects that could be corrected.
365 54% HIGH
3 to 3.9 Possibly worthy of preserve with
addressing some current
conditions where possible. Not
worthy of extensive project
redesign to retain. Addressing
curent conditions through
maintenance is recommended.

Remove due to conflict with
construction, most trees not a
viable candidate for transplant.

Moderate vigor, moderate twig
and small branch dieback,
thinning of crown, poor leaf
color.

Moderate structural defects that
may or that might be mitigated
with care.
227 34% MODERATE
1 to 2.9 Remove due to existing
condition, or remove due to
conflict with construction; not a
viable candidate for transplant.

In decline, epicormic growth,
extensive dieback of medium to
large branches. Dead or severe
decline, dieback scaffold
branches and or trunk, mostly
epicormic growth.

Significant structural defects that
cannot be abated. Structural
defects that cannot be abated or
dead.
69 10% LOW
Trees that are not rated due to
condition.
16 2% N/A
Total 677 100%
Preservation Assessments evaluate a tree's viability for retention based on combined ratings for Health (biological condition), Structure (stability and integrity), and Species Tolerance to Construction Impact (ability to withstand construction-related stress). These scores are averaged to guide decisions, aligning with arborist recommendations and local tree protection ordinances.

PRESERVATION ASSESMENT
Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 39

Page 299 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 1 Tree 2 Tree 3 Tree 4
Not Used
Tree 5 Tree 6 Tree 7 Tree 8
40

Page 300 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 9 Tree 10 Tree 11 Tree 12
Tree 13 Tree 14 Tree 15 Tree 16
41

Page 301 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 17 Tree 18 Tree 19 Tree 20
Tree 21 Tree 22 Tree 23 Tree 24
42

Page 302 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 25 Tree 26 Tree 27 Tree 28
Tree 29 Tree 30 Tree 31 Tree 32
43

Page 303 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 33 Tree 34 Tree 35 Tree 36
Tree 37 Tree 38 Tree 39 Tree 40
44

Page 304 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 41 Tree 42 Tree 43 Tree 44
Tree 45 Tree 46 Tree 47 Tree 48
45

Page 305 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 49 Tree 50 Tree 51 Tree 52
Tree 52 Tree 54 Tree 55 Tree 56
46

Page 306 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 57 Tree 58 Tree 59 Tree 60
Tree 61 Tree 62 Tree 63 Tree 64
47

Page 307 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 65 Tree 66 Tree 67 Tree 68
Tree 69 Tree 70 Tree 71 Tree 72
48

Page 308 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 73 Tree 74 Tree 75 Tree 76
Tree 77 Tree 78 Tree 79 Tree 80
49

Page 309 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 81 Tree 82 Tree 83 Tree 84
Tree 85 Tree 86 Tree 87 Tree 88
50

Page 310 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 89 Tree 90 Tree 91 Tree 92
Tree 93 Tree 94 Tree 95 Tree 96
51

Page 311 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 97 Tree 98 Tree 99 Tree 100
Tree 101 Tree 102 Tree 103 Tree 104
52

Page 312 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 105 Tree 106 Tree 107 Tree 108
Tree 109 Tree 110 Tree 111 Tree 112
53

Page 313 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 113 Tree 114 Tree 115 Tree 116
Tree 117 Tree 118 Tree 119 Tree 120
54

Page 314 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 121 Tree 122 Tree 123 Tree 124
Tree 125 Tree 126 Tree 127 Tree 128
55

Page 315 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 129 Tree 130 Tree 131 Tree 132
Tree 133 Tree 134 Tree 135 Tree 136
56

Page 316 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 137 Tree 138 Tree 139 Tree 140
Tree 141 Tree 142 Tree 143 Tree 144
57

Page 317 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 145 Tree 146 Tree 147 Tree 148
Tree 149 Tree 150 Tree 151 Tree 152
58

Page 318 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 153 Tree 154 Tree 155 Tree 156
Tree 157 Tree 158 Tree 159 Tree 160
59

Page 319 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 161 Tree 162 Tree 163 Tree 164
Tree 165 Tree 166 Tree 167 Tree 168
60

Page 320 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 169 Tree 170 Tree 171 Tree 172
Tree 173 Tree 174 Tree 175 Tree 176
61

Page 321 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 177 Tree 178 Tree 179 Tree 180
Tree 181 Tree 182 Tree 183 Tree 184
62

Page 322 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 185 Tree 186 Tree 187 Tree 188
Tree 189 Tree 190 Tree 191 Tree 192
63

Page 323 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 193 Tree 194 Tree 195 Tree 196
No Image
Tree 197 Tree 198 Tree 199 Tree 200
64

Page 324 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] No Image
Tree 201 202 2 Tree 203 Tree 204
Tree 205 Tree 206 Tree 207 Tree 208
65

Page 325 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 209 Tree 210 Tree 211 Tree 212
Tree 213 Tree 214 Tree 215 Tree 216
66

Page 326 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 217 Tree 218 Tree 219 Tree 220
Tree 221 Tree 222 Tree 223 Tree 224
67

Page 327 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 225 Tree 226 Tree 227 Tree 228
Tree 229 Tree 230 Tree 231 Tree 232
68

Page 328 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 233 Tree 234 Tree 235 Tree 236
Tree 237 Tree 238 Tree 239 Tree 240
69

Page 329 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 241 Tree 242 Tree 243 Tree 244
Tree 245 Tree 246 Tree 247 Tree 248
70

Page 330 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 249 Tree 250 Tree 251 Tree 252
Tree 253 Tree 254 Tree 255 Tree 256
71

Page 331 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 257 Tree 258 Tree 259 Tree 260
Tree 261 Tree 262 Tree 263 Tree 264
72

Page 332 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 265 Tree 266 Tree 267 Tree 268
Tree 269 Tree 270 Tree 271 Tree 272
73

Page 333 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 273 Tree 274 Tree 275 Tree 276
Tree 278 Tree 279 Tree 280 Tree 281
74

Page 334 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 282 Tree 283 Tree 284 Tree 285
Tree 286 Tree 287 Tree 288 Tree 289
75

Page 335 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 290 Tree 291 Tree 293 Tree 294
Tree 295 Tree 296 Tree 297 Tree 298
76

Page 336 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 277 Tree 299 Tree 300 Tree 301
Tree 302 Tree 303 Tree 304 Tree 305
77

Page 337 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 306 Tree 307 Tree 308 Tree 309
Tree 310 Tree 311 Tree 312 Tree 313
78

Page 338 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 314 Tree 315 Tree 316 Tree 317
Tree 318 Tree 319 Tree 320 Tree 321
79

Page 339 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 322 Tree 323 Tree 324 Tree 325
Tree 326 Tree 327 Tree 328 Tree 329
80

Page 340 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 330 Tree 331 Tree 332 Tree 333
Tree 334 Tree 335 Tree 336 Tree 337
81

Page 341 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 338 Tree 339 Tree 340 Tree 341
Tree 342 Tree 343 Tree 344 Tree 345
82

Page 342 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 346 Tree 347 Tree 348 Tree 349
Tree 350 Tree 351 Tree 352 Tree 353
83

Page 343 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 344 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 355 Tree 356 Tree 357 Tree 358
Tree 359 Tree 360 Tree 361 Tree 362
85

Page 345 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 363 Tree 364 Tree 365 Tree 366
Tree 367 Tree 368 Tree 369 Tree 370
86

Page 346 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 371 Tree 372 Tree 373 Tree 374
Tree 375 Tree 376 Tree 377 Tree 378
87

Page 347 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 379 Tree 380 Tree 381 Tree 382
Tree 383 Tree 384 Tree 385 Tree 386
88

Page 348 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 387 Tree 388 Tree 389 Tree 390
Tree 391 Tree 392 Tree 393 Tree 394
89

Page 349 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 395 Tree 396 Tree 397 Tree 398
Tree 399 Tree 400 Tree 401 Tree 402
90

Page 350 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 403 Tree 404 Tree 405 Tree 406
Tree 407 Tree 408 Tree 409 Tree 410
91

Page 351 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 411 Tree 412 Tree 413 Tree 414
Tree 415 Tree 416 Tree 417 Tree 418
92

Page 352 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 419 Tree 420 Tree 421 Tree 422
Tree 423 Tree 425
93

Page 353 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree Tree 425 Tree 426 Tree 427
Tree 428 Tree 429 Tree 430 Tree 431
94

Page 354 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 432 Tree 433 Tree 434 Tree 435
Tree 436 Tree 437 Tree 438 Tree 439
95

Page 355 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 440 Tree 441 Tree 442 Tree 443
Tree 444 Tree 445 Tree 446 Tree 447
96

Page 356 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 448 Tree 449 Tree 450 Tree 451
Tree 452 Tree 453 Tree 454 Tree 455
97

Page 357 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 456 Tree 457 Tree 458 Tree 459
Tree 460 Tree 461 Tree 462 Tree 463
98

Page 358 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 464 Tree 465 Tree 466 Tree 467
No Image
Tree 468 Tree 469 Tree 470 Tree 471
99

Page 359 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 360 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 476 Tree 477 Tree 478 Tree 479
Tree 480 Tree 481 Tree 482 Tree 483
101

Page 361 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 484 Tree 485 Tree 486 Tree 487
Tree 488 Tree 489 Tree 490 Tree 491
102

Page 362 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 492 Tree 493 Tree 494 Tree 495
Tree 496 496 497 Tree 498 Tree 499
103

Page 363 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 500 Tree 501 Tree 502 Tree 503
Tree 504 Tree 505 Tree 506 Tree 507
104

Page 364 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 508 Tree 509 Tree 510 Tree 511
Tree 512 Tree 513 Tree 514 Tree 515
105

Page 365 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 516 Tree 517 Tree 518 Tree 519
Tree 520 Tree 521 Tree 522 Tree 523
106

Page 366 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 524 Tree 525 Tree 526 Tree 527
Tree 528 Tree 529 Tree 530 Tree 531
107

Page 367 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 532 Tree 534 Tree 535 Tree 536
Tree 537 Tree 538 Tree 539 Tree 540
108

Page 368 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 541 Tree 542 Tree 543 Tree 544
Tree 545 Tree 546 Tree 547 Tree 548
109

Page 369 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 549 Tree 550 Tree 551 Tree 552
Tree 553 Tree 554 Tree 555 Tree 556
110

Page 370 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 557 Tree 558 Tree 559 Tree 560
Tree 561 Tree 562 Tree 563 Tree 564
111

Page 371 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 565 Tree 566 Tree 567 Tree 568
Tree 569 Tree 570 Tree 571 Tree 572
112

Page 372 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 573 Tree 574 Tree 575 Tree 576
Tree 578 Tree 579 Tree 580 Tree 581
113

Page 373 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 582 Tree 583 Tree 584 Tree 585
Tree 586 Tree 587 Tree 588 Tree 589
114

Page 374 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 590 Tree 591 Tree 592 Tree 593
Tree 594 Tree 595 Tree 596 Tree
115

Page 375 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 597 Tree 598 Tree 599 Tree 600
Tree 601 Tree 602 Tree 603 Tree 604
116

Page 376 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 605 Tree 606 Tree 607 Tree 608
Tree 609 Tree 610 Tree 611 Tree 612
117

Page 377 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 613 Tree 614 Tree 615 Tree 616
Tree 617 Tree 618 Tree 619 Tree 620
118

Page 378 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 621 Tree 622 Tree 623 Tree 624
Tree 625 Tree 626 Tree 627 Tree 628
119

Page 379 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 629 Tree 630 Tree 631 Tree 632
Tree 633 Tree 634 Tree 635 Tree 636
120

Page 380 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 637 Tree 638 Tree 639 Tree 640
Tree 641 Tree 642 Tree 643 Tree 644
121

Page 381 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 645 Tree 646 Tree 647 Tree 648
Tree 649 Tree 650 Tree 651 Tree 652
122

Page 382 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 653 Tree 654 Tree 655 Tree 656
Tree 657 Tree 658 Tree 659 Tree 660
123

Page 383 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 661 Tree 662 Tree 663 Tree 664
Tree 665 Tree 666 Tree 667 Tree 668
124

Page 384 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Tree 669 Tree 670 Tree 671 Tree 672
Tree 673 Tree 674 Tree 675 Tree 676
125

Page 385 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 386 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 20254

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
The contractor should have a copy of this report on-site at all times of operation for the referral.

Specific tree recommendations are listed in the Summary Findings and the Inventory pages.

ADDITIONAL TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS

1. A 6” layer of coarse mulch or woodchips is to be placed beneath the dripline (TPZ Tree Protection Zone) of the protected trees.

Mulch is to be kept 12” from the trunk.

2. A protective barrier of 6’ chain link fencing shall be installed around the dripline (TPZ) of the protected tree(s). The fencing can be moved within the dripline (TPZ) if authorized by the Project Arborist or City Arborist but not closer than 2’ from the trunk of any tree.

Fence posts shall be 1.5” in diameter and are to be driven 2’ into the ground. The distance between posts shall not be more than 10’.

This enclosed area is the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ). Tree Protection Fencing will be placed at the edge of the TPZ and no fencing shall be closer than the Critical Root Zone (CRZ). All Tree Protection Zones (TPZ) and Critical Root Zones (CRZ) distances are listed for each tree on the inventory.

3. Where trees have been established in a landscape and established near hardscapes, such as parking lot surfaces, walkways, and sidewalks. Tree protection fencing may be placed on the hardscape or just inside the hardscape as long as no wood parts are damaged.

No fencing will be allowed within the CRZ listed distance. In areas where minimal protection is required orange plastic fencing mounted on “T” Bar placed at the perimeter of the TPZ will be required. At any time should the focus of work change the tree protection requirements will be reassessed and changed to be the most effective.

4. Tree protection fencing will not be allowed to damage the tree canopy or any of its parts.

5. Movable barriers of chain link fencing secured to cement blocks can be substituted for “fixed” fencing if the Project Arborist and City Arborist agree that the fencing will have to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction. The builder may not move the fence without authorization from the Project Arborist or City Arborist.

6. Where the Town or Project Arborist has determined that tree protection fencing will interfere with the safety of work crews, Tree Wrap may be used as an alternative form of tree protection but. Wooden slats at least one inch thick is to be bound securely, edge-toedge, around the trunk. A single layer or more of orange plastic construction fencing is to be wrapped and secured around the outside of the wooden slats. Major scaffold limbs may require protection as determined by the City Arborist or Project Arborist. Straw waddle may also be used as a trunk wrap by coiling the waddle around the trunk up to a minimum height of six feet from grade. A single layer or more of orange plastic construction fencing is to be wrapped and secured around the straw waddle. 127

Page 387 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

7. Avoid the following conditions. DO NOT:
a. Allow run off of spillage of damaging materials into the area below any tree canopy. b. Store materials, stockpile soil, or park or drive vehicles within the TPZ. c. Cut, break, skin, or bruise roots, branches, or trunks without first obtaining authorization from the Project/Town Arborist. d. Allow fires or high heat under and adjacent to trees. e. Discharge exhaust into the foliage.
f. Secure cable, chain, or rope to trees or shrubs.
g. Trench, dig, or otherwise excavate within the dripline or TPZ of the tree(s) without first obtaining authorization from the Project or Town Arborist.
h. Apply soil sterilants under pavement near existing trees.

8. Only excavation by hand or compressed air shall be allowed within the dripline (TPZ) of trees. Machine trenching shall not be allowed.

9. Avoid injury to tree roots. When a ditching machine, which is being used outside of the dripline (TPZ) of trees, encounters roots smaller than 2”, the wall of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be hand-trimmed, making clear, clean cuts through the roots. All damaged, torn and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges, which promote decay. Trenches shall be filled within 24 hours, but where this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees shall be kept shaded with four layers of dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet. Roots 2” or larger, when encountered, shall be reported immediately to the Project Arborist, who will decide whether the Contractor may cut the root as mentioned above or shall excavate by hand or with compressed air under the root. The root is to be protected with a dampened burlap.

10. Route pipes outside of the area that is 10 times the diameter of a protected tree to avoid conflict with roots.

11. Where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the contractor shall bore beneath the dripline (TPZ) of the tree. The boring shall take place not less than 3’ below the surface of the soil to avoid encountering “feeder” roots.

12. Trees that have been identified in the arborist’s report as being in poor health and/or posing a health or safety risk, may be removed or pruned by more than one-third, subject to the approval of the required permit by the Sec. 29.10.0950 Town of Los Gatos. Pruning of existing limbs and roots shall only occur under the direction of the Town/Project Certified Arborist. 128

Page 388 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

13. Any damage due to construction activities shall be reported to the Project Arborist or Town Arborist within six hours so that remedial action can be taken.

14. Violation of any of the above provisions may result in sanctions or other disciplinary action.

MONTHLY INSPECTIONS
It is required that the site arborists provide periodic inspections during construction. Four-week intervals would be sufficient to access and monitor the effectiveness of the Tree Protection Plan and to provide recommendations for any additional care or treatment. An ISA Certified Arborist or ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist shall be retained as the Project Arborist to monitor the tree protection specifications. The Project Arborist shall be responsible for the preservation of the designated trees. Should the builder fail to follow the tree protection specifications, it shall be the responsibility of the Project Arborist to report the matter to the Town Arborist as an issue of non-compliance.

Trenching, Excavation and Equipment Use
Trenching, excavation or boring activity within the TPZ is restricted to the following activities, conditions, and requirements if approved by the Town or Project Arborist. Mitigating measures shall include prior notification to and direct supervision by the project arborist.

Aftercare of trees that have had major roots (roots over 2”-inches in diameter) will be focused on rehydrating the tree and increasing nutrient uptake, wound sealing and the retention of photosynthetic tissue for the subsequent 5 seasons. During this period, each tree will be assessed separately.

Notification. The contractor shall notify the project arborist a minimum of 24 hours in advance of the activity in the TPZ.

Root Severance. Roots that are encountered shall be cut to sound wood and repaired. Roots LESS than 1”-inch in diameter may be severed without arborist supervision and staged at the tree for inspection by the arborist. Roots 1- inches and greater must remain injuryfree.

Excavation. Any approved excavation, demolition or extraction of material shall be performed with equipment sitting outside the TPZ.

Methods permitted are by hand digging; hydraulic or pneumatic air excavation technology. Avoid excavation within the TPZ during hot, dry weather. Low pressure (less than 100 PSI), hydro excavation is highly recommended in the tree protection zone (TPZ). Root preservation is the main focus of the TPZ.

If excavation or trenching for drainage, utilities, irrigation lines, etc., is required it is the duty of the contractor to tunnel under any roots 2-inches in diameter and greater.

Before excavation for foundation/footings/walls, grading or trenching within the TPZ, roots shall first be severed cleanly 1- foot outside the TPZ and to the depth of the future excavation. The trench must then be hand dug and roots pruned with a sharp saw, Sawzall, narrow trencher with sharp blades or other approved root pruning equipment.

Heavy Equipment. Use of backhoes, steel tread tractors or any heavy vehicles within the TPZ is prohibited unless approved by the Town Arborist. If allowed, a protective root buffer is required. The protective buffer shall consist of a base course of tree chips spread over the root area to a minimum of 6-inch depth, layered by 3/4-inch quarry gravel to stabilize 3/4-inch plywood on top. This buffer within the TPZ shall be maintained throughout the entire construction process. 129

Page 389 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 ADDITIONAL TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS - Continued
Structural design. If an injurious activity or interference with roots greater than 2-inches will occur within the TPZ, plans shall specify a design of special foundation, footing, walls, concrete slab or pavement designs subject to Town Arborist approval.

Discontinuous foundations such as concrete pier and structural grade beam must maintain natural grade (not to exceed a 4-inch cut), to minimize root loss and allow the tree to use the existing soil.

Alternative Base Course Materials
I’m recommending Cornell University CU-Structural Soil, Lyngso Essential Soil custom mixed with 1.5”-inch aggregate or equal for base rock substitute in the tree protection zone (TPZ) of all trees on areas requiring compaction. I believe that this will improve the growing conditions and help the trees to recover from this impact of construction. The desired compaction capabilities can be reached by adjusting the organic portions of the mix.

Irrigation
I suggest that irrigation be kept at the seasonal and species-specific rates that are established in the region. In circumstances where a tree has been or will be impacted by construction, the hydration levels in the tree should be proactively adjusted by months before the trees need. Soil analysis and laboratory recommendations should be implemented and trees continually monitored.

In establishing landscape irrigation amounts the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) recommendations will be the guidelines for water use. In natural native settings, automated inline drip emitter irrigation will be established and maintained until the effects on construction development are no detectable. Inline emitter drip line will be placed to the outer 2/3rds of the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) away from the stem or trunk.

Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] 130

Page 390 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS

PROJECT ARBORIST
An ASCA/ISA Certified Arborist should be assigned to frequently inspect construction activities (a minimum of once per month is suggested) and continually provide findings and recommendations to sustain a reasonable assurance of tree survivability throughout the project.

Addition information and recommendations are available from McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services.

CONCLUDING REMARKS
All services recommended in this report should be performed under the supervision of an ASCA/ISA Certified Arborist per the standards established by the International Society of Arboriculture.

ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

1. All descriptions provided to the appraiser/consultant are assumed correct, and ownership/title are considered good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for legal matters or title quality.

2. It is assumed the property complies with all applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations.

3. Information has been sourced from reliable channels and verified when possible. The appraiser/consultant cannot guarantee the accuracy of third-party data.

4. The appraiser/consultant is not required to testify or attend court unless prior arrangements and additional fees are agreed upon.

5. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal.

6. Possession of this report does not imply publication or use rights without written consent from the appraiser/consultant.

7. This report and its contents are for the client’s use only, and cannot be publicly shared or used for marketing without written approval.

8. The appraiser’s/consultant’s fee is independent of the final value or recommendations provided.

9. Visual aids (sketches, photos, etc.) are not to scale and should not be construed as engineering data.

10. This report follows accepted methods and standards from the International Society of Arboriculture.

11. The appraiser/consultant is not responsible for structural defects in trees not inspected by climbing or root collar excavation.

While trees vary in their responses to damage, previous experience indicates that any living organism works diligently to survive.

I believe the above information is accurate and best describes the likely outcome. As an ISA Certified Arborist practicing in the State of California, I state that the enclosed information is true and correct to the best of my ability.

Sincerely,
Michael Gladden
McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A
131

Page 391 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Warning
—Tree Protection Zone—
This fence shall not be removed and is
subject to penalty according to Town Code

29.10.1025."
132

Page 392 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Arborist Report, Tree Preservation Plan, Surrey Farms, Project #4185.10, Los Gatos, CA 95032 October 16, 2025 Michael Gladden, ISA Certified Arborist #WE-2205A, McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services, 1821 South Bascom Ave., #243, Campbell, CA 95008 [email protected] Advertencia
—Zona de Protección de Árboles—
Esta cerca no se retirará y está sujeta a
penalización de acuerdo con el Código
Municipal 29.10.1025.
133

Page 393 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 394 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

ADDITIONAL

COSTS TOTAL
TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
2 Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

11.0 95.03 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,843 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 3 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 548 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 4 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,263 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 6 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 8,776 $ $ 600.00 9,400$ 7 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 842 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 9 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 499 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 10 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

13.0 132.73 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,575 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,200$ 14 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

8.0 50.27 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 975 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,600$ 15 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 364 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 16 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 364 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 17 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 364 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 18 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 381 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 23 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

21.0 346.36 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 6,719 300.00 $ $ 600.00 7,300$ 24 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 524 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 25 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

14.0 153.94 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,986 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,600$ 26 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,066 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 30 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 747 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 31 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

6.0 28.27 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 424 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 32 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,936 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,500$ 33 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 798 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 34 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 41 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.0 226.98 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,403 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,000$ 42 Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

4.0 12.57 10 50 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 3.8 $ 78.95$ 992.08$ 364 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 46 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 30 50 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 509 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 49 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 50 Pinus halepensis Aleppo Pine

6.0 28.27 50 30 80 53% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 399 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 51 Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 381 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 52 Juglans regia English Walnut

8.0 50.27 10 30 70 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 488 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 54 Pinus halepensis Aleppo Pine

17.0 226.98 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 2,602 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,200$ 57 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 8,776 $ $ 600.00 9,400$

TREE APPRAISAL TABLE - RETAINED TREES

REPRODUCTION METHOD - TRUNK FORMULA TECHNIQUE

SUBJECT TREE REPLACEMENT TREE CALCULATIONS
135

Page 395 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
59 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 30 50 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 374 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 60 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

26.0 530.93 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 14,044.32 300.00 $ 9,363 $ $ 600.00 10,000$ 61 Aesculus californica California Buckeye

7.0 38.48 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 62 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

13.0 132.73 90 90 80 87% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 3,043 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,600$ 63 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,990.30 300.00 $ 7,327 $ $ 600.00 7,900$ 64 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

20.0 314.16 10 30 50 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 2,493 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,100$ 75 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,066 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 76 Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 90 90 80 87% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,801 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 77 Olea europaea Olive

3.0 7.07 30 30 70 43% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 186.98$ 57 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 78 Olea europaea Olive

8.0 50.27 70 50 80 67% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 620 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 79 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 10 30 70 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 1,714 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,300$ 83 Quercus lobata Valley Oak

5.0 19.64 30 50 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 260 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 168
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 80 73% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,120 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,700$ 169
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,515 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 176
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 747 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 179
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 2,393 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,000$ 182 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

9.0 63.62 30 30 50 37% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 494 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 183 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,089 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 184 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

14.0 153.94 30 30 50 37% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 1,194 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 185 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

6.0 28.27 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 324 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 186 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

7.0 38.48 30 30 30 30% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 244 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 187 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,425 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,000$ 188 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,089 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 189 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

10.0 78.54 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,454 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 192 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

18.0 254.47 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,936 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,500$ 193 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

5.0 19.64 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 381 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 194
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 70 70 80 73% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 780 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 195 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

13.0 132.73 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,341 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 196
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 90 90 80 87% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 922 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 197
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 30 30 80 47% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 279 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 199 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,843 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 200 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

12.0 113.10 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 2,194 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 202
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

60.0 2827.44 70 50 80 67% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 74,792.24 300.00 $ 39,889 $ $ 600.00 40,500$ 136

Page 396 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
206
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

21.0 346.36 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 4,581 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,200$ 207
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,515 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 208
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,508 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 209
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

28.0 615.75 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 16,288.09 300.00 $ 10,859 $ $ 600.00 11,500$ 210
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.0 254.47 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 2,468 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,100$ 211
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

32.0 804.25 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 21,274.24 300.00 $ 12,765 $ $ 600.00 13,400$ 212
Olea europaea Olive

10.0 78.54 50 50 80 60% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 873 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 213
Olea europaea Olive

12.0 113.10 50 30 50 43% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 907 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 214
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 30 30 50 37% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 737 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 215
Olea europaea Olive

9.0 63.62 70 50 80 67% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 785 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 216
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 50 30 80 53% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 3,546 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,100$ 217
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

35.0 962.12 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 25,450.14 300.00 $ 18,663 $ $ 600.00 19,300$ 218
Olea europaea Olive

5.0 19.64 50 50 80 60% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 218 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 219
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 617 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 220
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 221
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,287 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 222
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 4,500 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,100$ 223
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,990.30 300.00 $ 7,327 $ $ 600.00 7,900$ 224
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 762 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 225
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 922 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 226
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,521 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 227
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

28.0 615.75 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 16,288.09 300.00 $ 11,945 $ $ 600.00 12,500$ 228
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.5 240.53 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,362.53$ 3,181 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,800$ 229
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

24.0 452.39 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 6,781 $ $ 600.00 7,400$ 230
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.5 165.13 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,368.07$ 2,184 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 231
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.5 143.14 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,786.36$ 1,893 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 232
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

25.5 510.71 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 13,509.35 300.00 $ 9,006 $ $ 600.00 9,600$ 233
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,602 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,200$ 234
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.5 240.53 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,362.53$ 4,666 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,300$ 235
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.5 268.80 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,110.46$ 4,029 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,600$ 236
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

23.5 433.74 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,473.34 300.00 $ 6,502 $ $ 600.00 7,100$ 237
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

34.0 907.92 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 15,211 $ $ 600.00 15,800$ 238
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

35.0 962.12 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 25,450.14 300.00 $ 14,422 $ $ 600.00 15,000$ 137

Page 397 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
239
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

25.0 490.88 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 12,984.76 300.00 $ 8,657 $ $ 600.00 9,300$ 240
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.0 254.47 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,488 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,100$ 241
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

34.0 907.92 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 16,011 $ $ 600.00 16,600$ 242
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 3,428 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 243
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 50 30 80 53% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,172 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 244
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

20.5 330.06 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,730.96$ 5,239 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,800$ 245
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 70 30 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,508 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 246
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 5,000 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,600$ 247
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

22.0 380.13 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 6,704 $ $ 600.00 7,300$ 248
Olea europaea Olive

17.0 226.98 50 50 70 57% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 2,382 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,000$ 249
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

30.0 706.86 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 18,698.06 300.00 $ 6,856 $ $ 600.00 7,500$ 250
Olea europaea Olive

7.0 38.48 70 50 80 67% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 475 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 251
Olea europaea Olive

10.0 78.54 50 50 70 57% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 824 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 252
Olea europaea Olive

8.0 50.27 70 50 70 63% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 589 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 253
Olea europaea Olive

18.0 254.47 70 70 80 73% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 3,455 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,100$ 254
Olea europaea Olive

14.0 153.94 70 70 80 73% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,090 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,700$ 255
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,003 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,600$ 256
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 4,250 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 257
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,296 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 258
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,307 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 259
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,496 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 260
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

25.0 490.88 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 12,984.76 300.00 $ 7,358 $ $ 600.00 8,000$ 261
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 1,801 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 262
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

23.0 415.48 50 50 80 60% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,990.30 300.00 $ 6,594 $ $ 600.00 7,200$ 263
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

34.0 907.92 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 7,205 $ $ 600.00 7,800$ 264
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,961 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,600$ 265
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 50 60 53% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,341 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 266
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.0 226.98 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,403 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,000$ 267
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

25.0 490.88 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 12,984.76 300.00 $ 6,492 $ $ 600.00 7,100$ 268
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,990 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 269
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,990 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 270
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,402 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 271
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 2,659 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 138

Page 398 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
272
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,296 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 273
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,715 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 274
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,122 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 275
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,403 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,000$ 276
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 70 50 80 67% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,172 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 277
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 0 0 0 0% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 278
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 70 70 80 73% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 6,094 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,700$ 279
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,257 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 280
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 70 50 80 67% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 886 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 281
Umbellularia californicaCalifornia Bay

8.0 50.27 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 3,826.53$ 3,444 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 282
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,089 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 283
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,224 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 284
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,307 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 285
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 1,950 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 286
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 1,950 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 287
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 617 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 288
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 1,493 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 289
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

22.0 380.13 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 7,039 $ $ 600.00 7,600$ 290
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

7.0 38.48 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 814 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 291
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 292
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

10.0 78.54 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,454 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 293
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 294
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

8.0 50.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 931 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 295
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

20.0 314.16 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 3,601 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,200$ 296
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,895 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 297
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

14.0 153.94 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,850 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,500$ 298
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

13.0 132.73 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,458 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,100$ 299
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 5,250 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,900$ 300
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 3,750 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,400$ 301
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

10.0 78.54 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,870 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 302
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 713 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 303
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 304
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

15.0 176.72 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 3,272 300.00 $ $ 500.00 3,800$ 139

Page 399 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
305
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 441 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 306
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 509 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 307
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 373 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 308 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,257 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 309 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

12.0 113.10 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,496 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 310
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 665 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 311
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 576 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 312
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 364 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 313
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 274 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 314
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 260 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 315
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 274 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 316 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

10.0 78.54 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 762 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 317 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,089 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 318 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

10.0 78.54 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 900 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 319
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 156 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 320
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 474 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 321
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 260 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 322
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 665 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 323
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 373 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 324
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

8.0 50.27 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 842 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 325
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 509 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 326
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

9.0 63.62 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 841 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 327 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,257 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 328 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,257 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 329
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 329 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 330
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 577 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 331
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 524 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 332 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,224 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 333
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 713 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 334
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

13.0 132.73 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,990 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 335
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

5.0 19.64 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 225 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 336
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 274 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 337 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

12.0 113.10 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,695 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,300$ 140

Page 400 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
338 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

15.0 176.72 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,961 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,600$ 339
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

3.0 7.07 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 186.98$ 106 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 340
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 341 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

8.0 50.27 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 576 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 342 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

14.0 153.94 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,036 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 343 Pinus brutia var.
eldarica Afghan Pine

15.0 176.72 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,649 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,200$ 344
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 274 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 345
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

6.0 28.27 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 474 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 346
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

21.0 346.36 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 5,192 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,800$ 347
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

21.0 346.36 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 5,803 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 348
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

24.0 452.39 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 34,438.78 300.00 $ 21,811 $ $ 600.00 22,400$ 349
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 31,628.67 300.00 $ 20,031 $ $ 600.00 20,600$ 350
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,425 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,000$ 351
Olea europaea Olive

14.0 153.94 70 50 70 63% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 1,805 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 352
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

5.0 19.64 30 50 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 1,494.74$ 648 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 353
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 354
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 900 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 355
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

20.0 314.16 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 3,601 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,200$ 356
Snag Snag

9.0 63.62 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 357
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

24.0 452.39 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 34,438.78 300.00 $ 17,219 $ $ 600.00 17,800$ 358
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 359
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 898 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 360
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

25.0 490.88 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 12,984.76 300.00 $ 6,492 $ $ 600.00 7,100$ 361
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.0 254.47 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 362
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 3,250 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,900$ 363
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

21.0 346.36 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 6,413 300.00 $ $ 600.00 7,000$ 364
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,756 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 365
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,756 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 366
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 70 30 30 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 729 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 367
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 70 30 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 2,659 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 368
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,402 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 369
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

19.0 283.53 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 5,250 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,900$ 370
Snag Snag

7.0 38.48 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 141

Page 401 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
371
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 3,272 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,900$ 372
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 665 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 373
Snag Snag

8.0 50.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 374
Olea europaea Olive

18.0 254.47 70 70 70 70% 70% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 3,298 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,900$ 375
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.0 254.47 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,263 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 376
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 377
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

30.0 706.86 70 70 70 70% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 18,698.06 300.00 $ 10,471 $ $ 600.00 11,100$ 378
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 379
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 380
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,224 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 381
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 954 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,600$ 382
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 31,628.67 300.00 $ 20,031 $ $ 600.00 20,600$ 383
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

5.0 19.64 70 50 50 57% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 235 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 384
Pinus halepensis Afghan Pine

11.0 95.03 70 30 50 50% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,006 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,600$ 385
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

22.0 380.13 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 3,687 $ $ 600.00 4,300$ 386
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 387
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

22.0 380.13 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 28,938.14 300.00 $ 12,540 $ $ 600.00 13,100$ 388
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

11.0 95.03 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 7,234.53$ 4,100 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,700$ 389
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

8.0 50.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 3,826.53$ 2,679 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 390
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

20.0 314.16 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 23,915.82 300.00 $ 16,741 $ $ 600.00 17,300$ 391
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 50 50 70 57% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,592 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,200$ 392
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 50 50 70 57% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 2,722 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 393
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 50 30 50 43% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 1,412 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,000$ 394
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 8,609.69$ 5,453 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,100$ 395
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

10.0 78.54 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 5,978.95$ 3,787 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,400$ 396
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

13.0 132.73 70 30 70 57% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 10,104.43 300.00 $ 4,581 $ $ 600.00 5,200$ 397
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 10,104.43 300.00 $ 5,120 $ $ 600.00 5,700$ 398
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

27.0 572.56 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 43,586.58 300.00 $ 30,511 $ $ 600.00 31,100$ 399
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

21.0 346.36 50 50 50 50% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 26,367.19 300.00 $ 10,547 $ $ 600.00 11,100$ 400
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

15.0 176.72 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 13,452.65 300.00 $ 8,520 $ $ 600.00 9,100$ 401
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

10.0 78.54 50 30 70 50% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 5,978.95$ 2,392 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,000$ 402
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

13.0 132.73 30 30 30 30% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 10,104.43 300.00 $ 2,425 $ $ 600.00 3,000$ 403
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

22.0 380.13 30 30 30 30% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 28,938.14 300.00 $ 6,945 $ $ 600.00 7,500$ 142

Page 402 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
404
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

19.0 283.53 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 21,584.02 300.00 $ 13,670 $ $ 600.00 14,300$ 405
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 623 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 406
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 898 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 407
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

15.0 176.72 50 30 30 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 13,452.65 300.00 $ 4,933 $ $ 600.00 5,500$ 408
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 50 30 30 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 2,202 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 409
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

18.0 254.47 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 19,371.81 300.00 $ 13,560 $ $ 600.00 14,200$ 410
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

17.0 226.98 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 17,279.18 300.00 $ 12,095 $ $ 600.00 12,700$ 411
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 15,306.12 300.00 $ 10,714 $ $ 600.00 11,300$ 412
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 2,659 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,300$ 413
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 414
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

19.0 283.53 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 21,584.02 300.00 $ 13,670 $ $ 600.00 14,300$ 415
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 31,628.67 300.00 $ 20,031 $ $ 600.00 20,600$ 416
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,850 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,500$ 417
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

22.0 380.13 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 5,698 $ $ 600.00 6,300$ 418
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

23.0 415.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 31,628.67 300.00 $ 20,031 $ $ 600.00 20,600$ 419
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,402 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 420
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 1,765 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 421
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 1,714 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,300$ 422
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

28.0 615.75 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 16,288.09 300.00 $ 7,058 $ $ 600.00 7,700$ 423
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

28.0 615.75 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 16,288.09 300.00 $ 7,058 $ $ 600.00 7,700$ 424
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

21.0 346.36 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 26,367.19 300.00 $ 13,184 $ $ 600.00 13,800$ 425
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

21.0 346.36 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 26,367.19 300.00 $ 13,184 $ $ 600.00 13,800$ 426
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

7.0 38.48 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 2,929.69$ 1,465 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 427
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 3,750 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,400$ 428
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

25.0 490.88 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 37,368.46 300.00 $ 18,684 $ $ 600.00 19,300$ 429
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

16.0 201.06 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 15,306.12 300.00 $ 7,653 $ $ 600.00 8,300$ 430
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

18.0 254.47 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 3,366 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 431
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

8.0 50.27 30 50 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 576 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 432
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

12.0 113.10 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 8,609.69$ 4,305 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 433
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

18.0 254.47 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 19,371.81 300.00 $ 12,269 $ $ 600.00 12,900$ 434
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 1,779 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 435
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

25.0 490.88 70 70 70 70% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 12,984.76 300.00 $ 7,271 $ $ 600.00 7,900$ 436
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 70 70% 80% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 15,306.12 300.00 $ 8,571 $ $ 600.00 9,200$ 143

Page 403 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
437
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

15.0 176.72 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 13,452.65 300.00 $ 8,520 $ $ 600.00 9,100$ 438
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

7.0 38.48 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 2,929.69$ 1,660 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,300$ 439
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

12.0 113.10 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 8,609.69$ 4,305 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 440
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

22.0 380.13 30 30 50 37% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 28,938.14 300.00 $ 10,611 $ $ 600.00 11,200$ 441
Prunus domestica Plum

5.0 19.64 10 10 10 10% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 1,494.74$ 149 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 442
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 10,770 $ $ 600.00 11,400$ 443
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,368 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 444
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 0 0 0 0% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 445
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 5,817 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 446
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,368 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 447
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 5,817 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 448
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

15.0 176.72 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 13,452.65 300.00 $ 7,623 $ $ 600.00 8,200$ 449
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

16.0 201.06 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 15,306.12 300.00 $ 6,633 $ $ 600.00 7,200$ 450
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

14.0 153.94 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 11,718.75 300.00 $ 6,641 $ $ 600.00 7,200$ 451
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

28.0 615.75 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 46,875.00 300.00 $ 26,563 $ $ 600.00 27,200$ 452
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

27.0 572.56 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 15,145.43 300.00 $ 10,602 $ $ 600.00 11,200$ 453
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

11.0 95.03 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,425 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,000$ 454
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

26.0 530.93 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 14,044.32 300.00 $ 9,831 $ $ 600.00 10,400$ 455
Snag Snag

16.0 201.06 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 456
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 4,709 300.00 $ $ 500.00 5,200$ 457
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

16.0 201.06 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 15,306.12 300.00 $ 8,673 $ $ 600.00 9,300$ 458
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

11.0 95.03 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 7,234.53$ 2,170 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 459
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

15.0 176.72 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 1,402 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,000$ 460
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

21.0 346.36 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 5,803 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 461
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,177 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 462
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

14.0 153.94 70 90 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 3,258 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,900$ 463
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 329 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 464
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

15.0 176.72 70 30 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,337 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 465
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

32.0 804.25 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 21,274.24 300.00 $ 14,892 $ $ 600.00 15,500$ 466
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,368 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 467
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

11.0 95.03 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 1,760 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 468
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,066 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,700$ 470
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

3.0 7.07 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 186.98$ 56 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 144

Page 404 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
471
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

14.0 153.94 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,307 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 472
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 166 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 473
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

15.0 176.72 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 3,272 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,900$ 474
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

13.0 132.73 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,458 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,100$ 475
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 2,094 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,700$ 476
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,458 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,100$ 477
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

11.0 95.03 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 2,262 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 478
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

11.0 95.03 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ 2,262 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,900$ 479
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

21.0 346.36 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 5,803 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 480
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 90 70 70 77% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,593 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,200$ 481
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 482
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 916 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 483
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,723 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,300$ 484
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,712 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,300$ 485
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,178 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 486
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,895 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 487
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,496 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 488
Heteromeles arbutifoliaToyon

4.0 12.57 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.09 3.43 $ 87.45$ 1,098.88$ 330 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 489
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,723 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,300$ 490
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

36.0 1017.88 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 26,925.21 300.00 $ 18,848 $ $ 600.00 19,400$ 491
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,712 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,300$ 492
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

27.0 572.56 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 15,145.43 300.00 $ 10,602 $ $ 600.00 11,200$ 493
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,224 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 494
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

32.0 804.25 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 21,274.24 300.00 $ 14,892 $ $ 600.00 15,500$ 495
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

17.0 226.98 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,803 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,400$ 496
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 505 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 497
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 50 70 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,316 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,900$ 498
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.0 226.98 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,203 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,800$ 499
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

15.0 176.72 90 70 70 77% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 3,584 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,200$ 500
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,895 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 501
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

26.0 530.93 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 14,044.32 300.00 $ 7,958 $ $ 600.00 8,600$ 502
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 70 50 70 63% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 6,063 $ $ 600.00 6,700$ 503
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

15.0 176.72 70 50 70 63% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,368 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,000$ 145

Page 405 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
504
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

27.0 572.56 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 15,145.43 300.00 $ 10,602 $ $ 600.00 11,200$ 505
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

10.0 78.54 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 900 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 506
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

14.0 153.94 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,579 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,200$ 507
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

16.0 201.06 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,368 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,000$ 508
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.0 226.98 90 70 80 80% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 3,843 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,400$ 511
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

19.0 283.53 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 4,750 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,400$ 512
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

13.0 132.73 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 3,511.08$ 2,224 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,800$ 516
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,177 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 519
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 90 70 70 77% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 398 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 520
Prunus dulcis Almond

8.0 50.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 3,826.53$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 522
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,895 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 526
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

7.0 38.48 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 527
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

8.0 50.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 931 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 529
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

5.0 19.64 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 519.39$ 329 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 532
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 841 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 533
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 841 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 535
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

8.0 50.27 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 842 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 539
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 188 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 578
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

8.0 50.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 931 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 579 Sambucus
neomexicana Blue Elderberry

10.0 78.54 30 30 30 30% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 5,978.95$ 1,794 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,400$ 580
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

27.0 572.56 50 30 70 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 15,145.43 300.00 $ 7,573 $ $ 600.00 8,200$ 581
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

34.0 907.92 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 19,213 $ $ 600.00 19,800$ 582
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

34.0 907.92 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 19,213 $ $ 600.00 19,800$ 583
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

36.0 1017.88 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 26,925.21 300.00 $ 17,053 $ $ 600.00 17,700$ 584
Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar

7.0 38.48 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 713 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 585
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

7.0 38.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 645 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 586
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore

31.0 754.77 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 19,965.37 300.00 $ 12,645 $ $ 600.00 13,200$ 587
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

23.0 415.48 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,990.30 300.00 $ 7,693 $ $ 600.00 8,300$ 588
Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood

5.0 19.64 90 70 80 80% 80% 100% 24" Box 4.75 17.72 $ 16.93$ 332.41$ 213 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 589
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 90 70 80 80% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 213 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 590
Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm

22.0 380.13 90 70 80 80% 70% 100% 5' BTH 4.75 17.72 $ 22.57$ 8,580.61$ 4,805 400.00 $ $ 600.00 5,400$ 610
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

21.0 346.36 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 26,367.19 300.00 $ 18,457 $ $ 600.00 19,100$ 611
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

21.0 346.36 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 9,162.05$ 7,330 300.00 $ $ 600.00 7,900$ 146

Page 406 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
612
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

22.0 380.13 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 6,368 $ $ 600.00 7,000$ 613
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

12.0 113.10 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 8,609.69$ 4,879 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,500$ 614
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

19.0 283.53 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 6,000 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,600$ 615
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 2,094 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,700$ 616
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 645 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 617
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,178 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 618
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,712 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,300$ 619
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

18.0 254.47 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,731.30$ 4,263 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,900$ 620
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

14.0 153.94 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 2,850 300.00 $ $ 600.00 3,500$ 621
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 524 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,100$ 622
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

4.0 12.57 0 50 0 17% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 55 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 623
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 9,573 $ $ 600.00 10,200$ 624
Olea europaea Olive

4.0 12.57 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 332.41$ 211 300.00 $ $ 600.00 800$ 625
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

19.0 283.53 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 7,500.00$ 6,000 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,600$ 626
Quercus douglasii Blue Oak

25.0 490.88 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 37,368.46 300.00 $ 23,667 $ $ 600.00 24,300$ 627
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

12.0 113.10 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,991.69$ 1,895 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,500$ 628
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

6.0 28.27 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 673 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,300$ 632
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

39.0 1194.59 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 31,599.72 300.00 $ 20,013 $ $ 600.00 20,600$ 633
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

9.0 63.62 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 841 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,400$ 634
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

7.0 38.48 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 916 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,500$ 637
Prunus domestica Plum

4.0 12.57 10 10 10 10% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 956.63$ 96 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 639
Prunus domestica Plum

4.0 12.57 10 10 10 10% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 956.63$ 96 300.00 $ $ 600.00 700$ 640
Prunus domestica Plum

3.0 7.07 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 538.11$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 641
Prunus domestica Plum

3.0 7.07 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 538.11$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 644
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

14.0 153.94 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,072.02$ 3,665 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,300$ 645
Prunus domestica Plum

5.0 19.64 0 30 30 20% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 1,494.74$ 299 300.00 $ $ 600.00 900$ 646
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

8.0 50.27 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,329.64$ 1,197 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 647
Prunus dulcis Almond

9.0 63.62 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 2.24 3.94 $ 76.13$ 4,842.95$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 648
Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm

44.0 1520.53 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 5' BTH 4.75 17.72 $ 45.15$ 68,644.88 800.00 $ 61,780 $ $ 600.00 62,400$ 649
Juniperus chinensis Chinese Juniper

23.0 415.48 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,990.30 300.00 $ 8,792 $ $ 600.00 9,400$ 650
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

28.0 615.75 90 90 90 90% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 16,288.09 300.00 $ 14,659 $ $ 600.00 15,300$ 651
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

17.0 226.98 90 70 80 80% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ 4,803 300.00 $ $ 600.00 5,400$ 652
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

15.0 176.72 50 30 50 43% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ 2,026 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,600$ 147

Page 407 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

TREE # BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME DBH (IN) CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA =(DBH^2)*0.7854 HEALTH % STRUCTURE % FORM % CONDITION %

FUNCTIONAL
LIMITATIONS %

EXTERNAL
LIMITATIONS %
LCANT
(RTD) REPLACEMENT

TREE DIAMETER (IN)

CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA
=(RTD^2)*0.7854

REPLACEMENT TREE
COST

UNIT TREE COST

BASIC REPRODUCTION
COST

DEPRECIATED

REPRODUCTION COST

TOTAL ADDITIONAL
COSTS

TOTAL REPRODUCTION

COST - ROUNDED
653
Stump Stump

9.0 63.62 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 654
Stump Stump

6.0 28.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 655
Stump Stump

6.0 28.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 656
Stump Stump

6.0 28.27 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 657
Stump Stump

15.0 176.72 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 4,674.52$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 658
Stump Stump

11.0 95.03 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,513.85$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 659
Stump Stump

17.0 226.98 0 0 0 0% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 6,004.16$ -$ 300.00 $ 600.00 600$ 661
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

20.0 314.16 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 8,310.25$ 5,817 300.00 $ $ 600.00 6,400$ 662
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

22.0 380.13 70 50 50 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 10,055.40 300.00 $ 5,698 $ $ 600.00 6,300$ 663
Aesculus californica California Buckeye

7.0 38.48 70 50 70 63% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,018.01$ 645 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,200$ 664
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

45.0 1590.44 50 50 70 57% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 42,070.64 300.00 $ 23,840 $ $ 600.00 24,400$ 665
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

24.0 452.39 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 11,966.76 300.00 $ 8,377 $ $ 600.00 9,000$ 666
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

16.0 201.06 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 5,318.56$ 3,723 300.00 $ $ 600.00 4,300$ 668
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

6.0 28.27 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 374 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 669
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

10.0 78.54 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 2,077.56$ 1,454 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,100$ 670
Pinus radiata Monterey Pine

50.0 1963.50 30 50 50 43% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 51,939.06 300.00 $ 18,006 $ $ 600.00 18,600$ 671
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,178 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 672
Eucalyptus globulus Blue Gum

25.0 490.88 10 50 50 37% 70% 100% 24" Box 4.75 17.72 $ 16.93$ 8,310.25$ 2,133 300.00 $ $ 600.00 2,700$ 673
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

9.0 63.62 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 1,682.83$ 1,178 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,800$ 674
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

6.0 28.27 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 747.92$ 374 300.00 $ $ 600.00 1,000$ 675
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

30.0 706.86 70 50 50 57% 80% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 18,698.06 300.00 $ 8,476 $ $ 600.00 9,100$ 676
Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak

34.0 907.92 70 70 70 70% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 24,016.62 300.00 $ 16,812 $ $ 600.00 17,400$ 677
Quercus lobata Valley Oak

40.0 1256.64 50 50 50 50% 100% 100% 24" Box 3.8 11.34 $ 26.45$ 33,241.00 300.00 $ 16,620 $ $ 600.00 17,200$ Total appraised value of protected trees 2,110,200$
Appraisal method - Guide for Plant Appraisal, 10th Edition - Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers Reproduction Method - Trunk Formula Technique
LCANT - Largest Commonly Available Nursery Tree Selectree Source for replacement tree cost for like species listed above-Online, Devil Mountain Wholesale Nursery, GDNC Nursery, Central Wholesale Nursery Methodology:

To convert Health and Structure Ratings: Dead = 0%, 1 = 10%, 2 = 30%, 3 = 50%, 4 = 70%, 5 = 90%.

Form ratings are interpreted from field notes and other ratings.

Functional limitations are considered generally good for the naturalized site, ie. available growing space, etc. Some considerations are species characteristics such as disease susceptibility, invasiveness, proximity to property lines, etc.

External limitations are considered generally good for the naturalized site. Some considerations are proximity to powerlines, etc. 148

Page 408 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
149

Page 409 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
150

Page 410 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
151

Page 411 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
152

Page 412 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
153

Page 413 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
154

Page 414 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
155

Page 415 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
156

Page 416 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
157

Page 417 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
158

Page 418 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
159

Page 419 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
160

Page 420 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025
October 28, 2025
October 28, 2025
Erin Walters
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
I have reviewed the plans, most recently revised report, and response to prior comments.

Enclosed are the most recent responses and history of comments. At this time I have no further comments on the report provided.

Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 1 of 24

MEMORANDUM
To: Richard Gessner Date: 10/20/2025
From: HMH Job No.: 4185.10
Subject:

Response to 4th round Surrey
Farms Consulting Arborist
Review Letter
October 14, 2025 Review
August 19, 2025
Erin Walters
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
This letter is in response to the latest submission for 178 Twin Oaks Drive (Surrey Farms) dated July 25, 2025. Enclosed is the prior response and the applicant’s response to that submission.

Enclosed are the most recent peer review comments and recommendations.

Please see HMH Landscape October responses in GREEN below.

Page 421 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025
October 28, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 2 of 24

MEMORANDUM

1. Comment: Lot 3: Lot 3 has a retaining wall
around the site and along the property
boundary adjacent to 221 Brook Acres Drive.

There are two large trees, one valley oak
(Quercus lobata) and one coast live oak
(Quercus agrifolia) located on 221 Brook
Acres Drive not accounted for in the plans,
survey, or tree detail. Trees within 30 feet of
the property boundary are to be included in
survey and arborist’s report. There are many
trees “off site” included in the report but
these are not.

A. Recommendation: Tree protection for these
two boundary trees is required. An
adjustment to the wall location may be
required as both trees are at or very close to
the property boundary (Image 1). Include
trees within 30 feet of the property in the
plans and report.

B. Recommendation: Work performed within
the drip line or twenty feet (20’) of the trunks
IMAGE 1: ADJACENT OAKS 221 BROOK
ACRES
requires monitoring and documentation from the project arborist. Any work performed to the trees requires specifications in writing according to the most recent ANSI A300 document pertaining to the activity (Pruning, Soil Management etc.)

Page 422 ends

MEMORANDUM
HMH Response: Trees mentioned in comment are located within project boundary and called out in report and tagged for removal under numbers 566 and 569.

MCA: This item is currently unresolved. Ground observations of the tree locations do not appear to match was is indicated on the plans versus what is observed on site.

Recommendation: Please accurately locate the trees or verify their location accuracy. Please provide methodology used to obtain tree locations for the site. For example “the trees were surveyed by a California licensed engineer” or “trees were located with a GPS receiver with an error of “X” feet and plotted on a plan or aerial map”.

HMH October Response: Please see the updated Landscape T-Sheets for lot 3 and the “Overall” for updated tree 566 and 569 tree locations. The 2 trees are now listed to remain and protect. This information is reflected in the updated Arborist report as well.

McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services used GPS to obtain the original tree locations as well as 3 specific known bench markers/monuments. All tree data for the Los Gatos project were gathered with iPads and iPhones running the ArborPro Software suite, enabling efficient real-time data entry and mapping. Each tree location was plotted directly onto the project’s base map using integrated GPS functionality accurate within 1 meter. The location accuracy can change dramatically based on which base map is used, GPS location accuracy, and the quality of the base map image.

HMH’s licensed Survey team directed Michael’s team to use the 3 known benchmarks based on existing data per HMH’s survey work located adjacent to the site, specifically at the cul-de-sac of Longmeadow Drive close to the project. The coordinates provided by Michael’s team were inputted by the HMH survey team based on the 3 known benchmarks.

In some cases under heavy canopy coverage GPS coordinates can be offset by approximately 3 to 6 meters, which may explain any perceived discrepancies in this particular location. While such variance is a known limitation of GPS data collection, it has not previously presented an issue in past inventories to Michael Gladden’s knowledge. Ariel views and data do reflect localized heavy canopy coverage in this portion of the site. We do believe that the discrepancy in the location of trees #566 and #569 are anomalies. Checks were performed, shifting the trees globally to observe alignment, which yielded results supporting the anomaly related to trees #566 and #569.

Page 423 ends

MEMORANDUM

2. Comment: Plan Sheet and Report Discrepancies: There are few discrepancies between the report disposition table and the plan sheets. The following need to be consistent:

Tree #191 is labeled as “remove” in the report and “save” in the plan sheet.

Trees #192, #195, #199, #202, and #585 are all labeled as “save” in the report and “remove” in the plan sheets.

A. Recommendation: Revise the plans and/or report to be consistent throughout the documents.

2. HMH Response: Trees on planning sheets have been updated to match the arborist report and landscape plans- Tree #191 as remove, Trees #192, #195, #199, #202, and #585 are all labeled as “save”.

MCA: Accepted

3. Comment: Dead Trees marked for retention: Trees #393, #303, #353, #356, #358, #361, #370, #373, #376, #378, #379, #645, #640, #641, and #647 are labeled as to be in “Dead” condition but are listed as “Save” trees. It is possible to retain these dead trees for various reasons including wildlife habitat, if they don’t pose an unreasonable risk to life orproperty.

A. Recommendation: Indicate and revise the plans and report to be consistent if changes are made to the disposition of these trees. If they are to be retained provide a Level 2: Basic Tree Risk Assessment to ensure public safety.

3. HMH Response: Trees listed above are updated to be removed, planning, landscape sheets and arborist report reflect these updates.

MCA: Accepted

Page 424 ends

MEMORANDUM

4. Comment: Number Count Summary: The inventory sheet and report contains 677 rows of data and the report summarizes twenty-nine (29) species. The summary in the report is incorrect or indicates incorrect counts. The report does not summarize the relevant treedata. 52 trees are listed as “Off Site”.
37 trees are “Exempt” but only 11 are listed as “Exempt”. There are an additional 26 that should be labeled “Exempt”, which are primarily plums, olives, almonds, and one English walnut.
4 spaces are labeled "not used”
7 “stumps” are recorded.
31 ”dead” trees are recorded.

The inventory implies twenty-nine (29) species, but there are really twenty-six (26).

Twenty-two (22) of the twenty-six (26) are “Protected” by the ordinance when you remove the four “Exempt” species.

A. Recommendation: Correct the species summary in the report to reflect 26 overall and 22 “Protected”. Include all plums, olives, English walnut, and almonds less than 18 inches in diameter as “Exempt” in the table per the Town Ordinance.

HMH Response: Arborist report “Tree Summary” has been updated to correctly reflect noted quantities above.

MCA: “Summary of Findings” on page 9 of the report has not been updated and still contains erroneous data including quantity of trees and quantity of species. There is no summary of tree “Protected”, “Large Protected”, “Exempt”. This section of the report has not been updated.

Recommendation: Update the report page 9 to provide the correct data including a summary of trees to be removed and retained along with what has been expressed and provided above in comment 4.

HMH October Response: Please see the updated Arborist report on page 9 with the requested information, including the categories listed in item 4 above.

4. Comment: Mitigation: The replacement trees indicated are 582. It is not clear where this number was derived from. The table at the end of the report indicates 551 replacements are required, eighty-five (85) total replacements are to be installed per the Landscape Plans, and the remaining 466 will still required mitigation. A total of 223 trees are indicated for removal.

HMH Response: 582 trees are not currently indicated on the landscape plans. A total of 551 replacements are calculated in the on-site tree mitigation table in the overall mitigation and protection plan landscape sheets.

Page 425 ends

MEMORANDUM
MCA: How many trees are indicated for removal and how many calculated replacements are required? How many replacements are shown on the plans? HMH October Response: Listed on the “Overall” Landscape Plan T-Sheets (“Tree Mitigation Summary Table”) and the updated Arborist report: 224 Trees are to be removed. 85 trees are proposed (40-24" box, 45-36” box). Required Trees: 439-24" box, 161-36" box.

5. Recommendation: See recommendations in comment 8 and be consistent with the report and plan sheets for replacement trees.

6. Formatting: The arborist report states the correct date of “Revision 3” on the title page.

However, there are artifact dates of November 23, 2024, December 15, 2024 scattered throughout, and then no header, footer, dates or page numbers for the new appraisaldata sheets and included T sheets in the report.

A. Recommendation: Upon next update revise headers, footers, page numbers, and dates for clarity.

HMH Response: Arborist report reflects latest date for headers, footers, and page numbers.

MCA: Accepted

6. Comment: All Landscape Plans need to be updated to include tree identification number locations within the plans.

A. Recommendation: Update landscape plans accordingly to reflect tree location/ID numbers.

HMH Response: Landscape plan sheets now have updated existing protected tree ID locations per request.

MCA: Accepted

7. Comment: Include the following summaries in the arborist’s report:

A. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees on site with trunk diameters greater than four inches at fifty-four inches above grade, and the total quantity of those species.

B. Recommendation: Include a summary of the total quantity of trees considered “Protected” or Large Protected” on site.

C. Recommendation: Include a summary of the total quantity of “Protected” or “Large Protected” trees on site proposed for removal.

Page 426 ends

MEMORANDUM
D. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees required for replanting on site pursuant the Town of Los Gatos Tree Canopy Replacement Standard section Sec. 29.10.0985.

Determination and conditions of permit. (1)(2) Table 3-1.

E. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees proposed to be planted on site, and be sure this amount is consistent with the submitted Landscape Plans.

8. HMH Response: Arborist report updated with requested summaries in the “Tree Summary” table following tree tag data. Required trees indicated on “T” sheets.

MCA: Partial acceptance, Items D and E need to be included. Items A, B, and C along with quantity of trees removed and retained needs to be updated on Page 9 of the report.

HMH October Response: Items D and E, as related to required and proposed trees, are now listed on page 9 of the updated Arborist report. Items A, B, and C along with quantities are now updated in the Arborist report.

Richard J. Gessner
ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #496
ISA Board Certified Master Arborist®WE-4341B
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified - Valid to 2029

Page 427 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025
October 14, 2025 Review
August 19, 2025
Erin Walters
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
This letter is in response to the latest submission for 178 Twin Oaks Drive (Surrey Farms) dated July 25, 2025. Enclosed is the prior response and the applicant’s response to that submission.

Enclosed are the most recent peer review comments and recommendations.

1. Comment: Lot 3: Lot 3 has a retaining wall
around the site and along the property
boundary adjacent to 221 Brook Acres Drive.

B. Recommendation: Work performed within
the drip line or twenty feet (20’) of the trunks
requires monitoring and documentation from the project arborist. Any work performed to the trees requires specifications in writing according to the most recent ANSI A300 document pertaining to the activity (Pruning, Soil Management etc.) . HMH Response: Trees mentioned in comment are located within project boundary and Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 8 of 24
IMAGE 1: ADJACENT OAKS 221 BROOK
ACRES

Page 428 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025
called out in report and tagged for removal under numbers 566 and 569.

MCA: This item is currently unresolved. Ground observations of the tree locations do not appear to match was is indicated on the plans versus what is observed on site.

2. Comment: Plan Sheet and Report Discrepancies: There are few discrepancies between the report disposition table and the plan sheets. The following need to be consistent:

Tree #191 is labeled as “remove” in the report and “save” in the plan sheet.

Trees #192, #195, #199, #202, and #585 are all labeled as “save” in the report and “remove” in the plan sheets.

A. Recommendation: Revise the plans and/or report to be consistent throughout the documents.

MCA: Accepted

3. HMH Response: Trees listed above are updated to be removed, planning, landscape sheets and arborist report reflect these updates.

MCA: Accepted
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 9 of 24

Page 429 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025

4. Comment: Number Count Summary: The inventory sheet and report contains 677 rows of data and the report summarizes twenty-nine (29) species. The summary in the report is incorrect or indicates incorrect counts. The report does not summarize the relevant tree data. 52 trees are listed as “Off Site”.
37 trees are “Exempt” but only 11 are listed as “Exempt”. There are an additional 26 that should be labeled “Exempt”, which are primarily plums, olives, almonds, and one English walnut.
4 spaces are labeled "not used”
7 “stumps” are recorded.
31 ”dead” trees are recorded.

The inventory implies twenty-nine (29) species, but there are really twenty-six (26).

Twenty-two (22) of the twenty-six (26) are “Protected” by the ordinance when you remove the four “Exempt” species.

4. HMH Response: Arborist report “Tree Summary” has been updated to correctly reflect noted quantities above.

Recommendation: Update the report page 9 to provide the correct data including a summary of trees to be removed and retained along with what has been expressed and provided above in comment 4.

5. Comment: Mitigation: The replacement trees indicated are 582. It is not clear where this number was derived from. The table at the end of the report indicates 551 replacements are required, eighty-five (85) total replacements are to be installed per the Landscape Plans, and the remaining 466 will still required mitigation. A total of 223 trees are indicated for removal.

5. HMH Response: 582 trees are not currently indicated on the landscape plans. A total of 551 replacements are calculated in the on-site tree mitigation table in the overall mitigation and protection plan landscape sheets.

MCA: How many trees are indicated for removal and how many calculated replacements are required? How many replacements are shown on the plans? Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 10 of 24

Page 430 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025

6. Recommendation: See recommendations in comment 8 and be consistent with the report and plan sheets for replacement trees.

6. Formatting: The arborist report states the correct date of “Revision 3” on the title page.

A. Recommendation: Upon next update revise headers, footers, page numbers, and dates for clarity.

6. HMH Response: Arborist report reflects latest date for headers, footers, and page numbers.

MCA: Accepted

7. Comment: All Landscape Plans need to be updated to include tree identification number locations within the plans.

A. Recommendation: Update landscape plans accordingly to reflect tree location/ID numbers.

7. HMH Response: Landscape plan sheets now have updated existing protected tree ID locations per request.

MCA: Accepted

8. Comment: Include the following summaries in the arborist’s report:

A. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees on site with trunk diameters greater than four inches at fifty-four inches above grade, and the total quantity of those species.

B. Recommendation: Include a summary of the total quantity of trees considered “Protected” or Large Protected” on site.

C. Recommendation: Include a summary of the total quantity of “Protected” or “Large Protected” trees on site proposed for removal.

D. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees required for replanting on site pursuant the Town of Los Gatos Tree Canopy Replacement Standard section Sec. 29.10.0985.

Determination and conditions of permit. (1)(2) Table 3-1.

E. Recommendation: Include the total quantity of trees proposed to be planted on site, and be sure this amount is consistent with the submitted Landscape Plans.

Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 11 of 24

Page 431 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Response Review August 19, 2025 October 14, 2025

8. HMH Response: Arborist report updated with requested summaries in the “Tree Summary” table following tree tag data. Required trees indicated on “T” sheets.

MCA: Partial acceptance, Items D and E need to be included. Items A, B, and C along with quantity of trees removed and retained needs to be updated on Page 9 of the report.

Richard J. Gessner
ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #496
ISA Board Certified Master Arborist® WE-4341B
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified - Valid to 2029
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 12 of 24

Page 432 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
May 13, 2025
Erin Walters
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Summary
I was asked to review the plans and the applicant’s arborist report and provide findings and recommendations.

The previous arborist’s report provided by McClintock Landscape Horticultural Services (arborist Michael Gladden) dated December 15, 2024. New information and plans were provided.
• There are no specific tree protection measures regarding those proposed for retention - Sec.

29.10.1000. New property development. (c). Not Completed: The design and civil plans still have not been indicated as reviewed by the arborist. There is boiler plate protection information in the plan set and fence locations placed on the T sheets • The table in the report does not properly indicate the disposition of each tree including “Protected” or “Large Protected”. - 29.10.1000. New property development (a)(3). Sec.

29.10.0970. Exceptions. (1) or (2). Not completed: The tree table in the report was no not updated and still indicates several “Protected” trees as “Exempt”. Unless the trees meet the criteria in 29.10.0970. Exceptions. (1) or (2) they would be considered “Protected.” There was a new data sheet provided that does contain this information but it is not consistent or housed in one consolidated arborist report.
• Tree appraisals were performed and values provided per- 29.10.1000. New property development. (c)(3) Not completed: but still performed incorrectly. The Appraisal was provided by HMH and states the 10th edition the Guide for Plant Appraisal was used. The appraisals do not use the Western Chapter Supplement 2004 for tree size or those now provided in SelecTree website (same information). There is no discussion as to how the condition ratings provided in the McClintock report were translated to percentages used in the HMH calculations. “Functional and External Limitations” do not appear to follow the guidance in the tenth edition either, and all depreciation factors were indicated to be .6 or .7 (60% or 70%). The result significantly undervalued trees. For example tree #227 (valley oak in good condition with 24 inch trunk diameter) as appraised using the tenth edition, while using the HMH provided depreciation factors, would result in a rounded depreciated value of $8,100.

However the HMH report stated this tree as valued at $2,118.00.

Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 13 of 24

Page 433 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
• No specific development plans were reviewed or indicated or any assessment of impacts (remove or retain). Partially completed: The disposition of removal and retention is now provided in the supplemental sheet but needs to be consistent and housed in one consolidated updated arborist’s report.
• The plan sheets provide unacceptable tree protection specifications including fence details and materials. Completed: Sheets have been updated to reflect the Town’s requirements.

Completed: The plan set now contains the required Tree Preservation Instructions (Sheet T-1) sheet Sec. 29.10.1000. New property development. (c) (1) or a Landscape Plan indicating replanting information consistent with the Town of Los Gatos Tree Canopy Replacement Standard section Sec. 29.10.0985. Determination and conditions of permit. (1)(2) Table 3-1.

Observations to be Resolved, and Recommendations
Tree Data Sheets: The overall plan set needs to include the overall data sheets with all the trees, however for each individual lot only the trees on that lot and those directly adjacent that could be affected should be included. At this point each lot plan sheet includes the overall data sheet with all the trees.

Tree Tables on sheets 2.2 and T-1 need to be consistent with the same information, preferably as they appear on sheet 2.2. The T-1 sheet does not include critical information such as species, trunk diameter and other information as included in 2.2.

All plans require the tree numbers to be placed on those plans whether trees are to be removed or retained.

Appraisals: The appraisals need to be performed according to the 10th edition the Guide for Plant Appraisal Trunk Formula Technique. This has not been done correctly to date and trees are significantly under values with incorrect “Replacement Tree Sizes”, “Replacement Cost” and unjustified “Functional” and “External Limitations”. There is no consistency between the tree condition ratings within the report that use a 1-4 scale and the actual percentages required to perform the appraisal calculations.

Final Arborist Report: The arborist report from December of 2024 provided by McClintock has not been updated and only untethered supplements have been supplied. The final arborist report needs to be updated and housed in one document including the tree inventory, assessment, protection guidelines and specifications, appraisal data and results, expected impacts, and disposition of the trees.

Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 14 of 24

Page 434 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Lot 1: Trees #1, #8, #11 and #41 are all four to six feet from a proposed newly constructed road, it does not appear these trees have any chance to survive construction of that infrastructure and al the other trees in the same trajectory are labeled as removals. Please explain how and why these trees will survive construction.

There is nothing affecting Large protected tree #60 yet it is proposed for removal. Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Lot 2: There does not appear to be anything affect trees #585 and #578. Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Tree #36 is not likely to survive construction impacts, please indicate how this tree will be protected throughout construction or label it for removal.

Lot 3: Tree #569 does not appear to have any construction impacts around it causing its removal.

Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Lot 4: Both save trees on this site, #106 and #133, are atop retaining walls and will not survive construction. Please indicate how these trees will be protected throughout construction or label them for removal.

Lot 5: There appears to be a tree adjacent to the driveway with no I.D. number. On the T-1 sheet it looks like it could be a replacement tree, however it also shows up on the grading plans. Please confirm this tree is present or not and if not it should not be on the grading plan.

Lot 6: Tree #170 does not appear to have any construction impacts around it causing its removal.

Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Lot 7: No remarks.

Lot 8: No tree table on sheet 2.2, keep plan sets consistent with tree tables on the same sheets with the same data.

Trees #610, #622, and #616 do not appear to have any construction impacts around them causing removal. Please indicate how these trees meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 15 of 24

Page 435 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Lot 9: Trees #509, #510, #513, #514, #515, #517, #518, #521, #523, #524, #525, #528, #529, #530, #531, #534, #617, #620, #621, and #627 do not appear to have any construction impacts around them causing removal. Please indicate how these trees meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Lot 10: No tree table on sheet 2.2, keep plan sets consistent with tree tables on the same sheets with the same data.

Trees #182, #183, #186, #188, #190, #192, #195, and #199 do not appear to have any construction impacts around them causing removal. Please indicate how these trees meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Lots 11 and 12: No remarks.

Page 436 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 17 of 24

Page 1 of 4 ends

SUCCESS BUILT ON SERVICE, QUALITY, & COMMITMENT
SINCE 1976
1570 OAKLAND ROAD SAN JOSE, CA 95131 | 408-487-2200 | HMHCA.COM | HMHLASTUDIO.COM planning ● civil engineering ● public works ● landscape architecture ● land surveying July 28th 2025
Job No. 4185.10
Erin Walters
Richard Gessner
Town of Los Gatos
Re: Twin Oaks | Surrey Farms Arborist Review and Responses HMH Response to Comments provided by Richard J. Gessner and Erin Walters.

Dear Team:

This letter is in response to plan check comments made on the document titled, “Arborists review” dated May 13, 2025. The HMH responses are in Green font below.

Sincerely,
Shawn Taylor
HMH Landscape
Landscape Architecture Manager
PLA 6755

Page 437 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 18 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 2 of 4
May 13, 2025
Erin Walters
Community Development Department
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
Summary
I was asked to review the plans and the applicant’s arborist report and provide findings and recommendations.

29.10.1000. New property development. (c). Not Completed: The design and civil plansstill have not been indicated as reviewed by the arborist. There is boiler plate protection information in the plan set and fence locations placed on the T sheets HMH Response: The following note has been added to page 3 of the updated Arborist report:
*Note: Grading and Planting Plans were reviewed as of June I, 2025. All reviewed plans appear typical and appropriate. However, the Project Arborist should be present during excavation activities within tree protection zones to ensure proper procedures are followed.

All detailed tree protection information, notes and details are on the “T” sheets within the Landscape Plans. Additionally, the following is stated for future prescriptive measures needed during the construction phase of the project:
(6) RETAIN THE SERVICES OF A CERTIFIED OR CONSULTING ARBORIST WHO SHALL SERVE AS THE

PROJECT ARBORIST FOR PERIODIC MONITORING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND THE HEALTH OF THOSE TREES TO BE PRESERVED. THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL BE PRESENT WHENEVER

ACTIVITIES OCCUR WHICH MAY POSE A POTENTIAL THREAT TO THE HEALTH OF THE TREES TO BE PRESERVED AND SHALL DOCUMENT ALL SITE VISITS.

Page 438 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 19 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 3 of 4
• The table in the report does not properly indicate the disposition of each tree including “Protected” or “Large Protected”. - 29.10.1000. New property development (a)(3). Sec.

HMH Response: The Arborist report “June 4, 2025, Revision 2” has been updated per your direction.
• Tree appraisals were performed and values provided per- 29.10.1000. New property development. (c)(3) Not completed: but still performed incorrectly. The Appraisal was provided by HMH and states the 10th edition the Guide for Plant Appraisal was used. The appraisals do not use the Western Chapter Supplement 2004 for tree size or those now provided in SelecTree website (same information). There is no discussion as to how the condition ratings provided in the McClintock report were translated to percentages used in the HMH calculations. “Functional and External Limitations” do not appear to follow the guidance in the tenth edition either, and all depreciation factors were indicated to be .6 or .7 (60% or 70%). The result significantly undervalued trees. For example tree #227 (valley oak in good condition with 24 inch trunk diameter) as appraised using the tenth edition, while using the HMH provided depreciation factors, would result in a rounded depreciated value of $8,100.

However the HMH report stated this tree as valued at $2,118.00.

HMH Response: The tree appraisals have been corrected. The formula has been updated to match the 10th edition Guide for Plant Appraisal. SelecTree was used for the approximate cross-sectional area for the LCANT. A methodology explanation was added to the end of the appraisals explaining what criteria was used in converting the ratings from the report to the appraisals.
• No specific development plans were reviewed or indicated or any assessment of impacts (remove or retain). Partially completed: The disposition of removal and retention is now provided in the supplemental sheet but needs to be consistent and housed in one consolidated updated arborist’s report.

HMH Response: The Arborist report “June 4, 2025, Revision 2” has been updated per your direction, showing this additional information as consistent with the “T” sheets in the Landscape Sheets.

Page 439 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 20 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 4 of 4
• The plan sheets provide unacceptable tree protection specifications including fence details and materials. Completed: Sheets have been updated to reflect the Town’srequirements.

HMH Response: The Landscape “T” sheets for each lot are updated to list the specific associated lot information extracted from the overall tree data.

HMH Response: The Landscape “T” sheets for each lot are updated to list the specific associated lot critical information as listed/recommended above.

All plans require the tree numbers to be placed on those plans whether trees are to be removed or retained.

Page 440 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 21 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 5 of 4
Final Arborist Report: The arborist report from December of 2024 provided by McClintock has not been updated and only untethered supplements have been supplied. The final arborist report needs to be updated and housed in one document including the tree inventory, assessment, protection guidelines and specifications, appraisal data and results, expected impacts, and disposition of the trees.

HMH Response: The Arborist report has been updated to contain the specific information as listed/recommended above.

Lot 1: Trees #1, #8, #11 and #41 are all four to six feet from a proposed newly constructed road, it does not appear these trees have any chance to survive construction of that infrastructure and al the other trees in the same trajectory are labeled as removals. Please explain how and why these trees will survive construction.

HMH Response: The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition. Certain tree removals or associated thinning/pruning are associated with Hillside Development Guidelines for Fire Prevention. The disposition updates shown are:

Removed 1,8,11
Saved 60
Lot 2: There does not appear to be anything affect trees #585 and #578. Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

Tree #36 is not likely to survive construction impacts, please indicate how this tree will be protected throughout construction or label it for removal.

Saved 585, 578
Removed 36

Page 441 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 22 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 6 of 4
Lot 3: Tree #569 does not appear to have any construction impacts around it causing its removal.

Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

HMH Response: The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition. Some trees are removed as related to utility easement conflicts with canopy and additional agency comments. The disposition updates shown are:

Removed 566
Lot 4: Both save trees on this site, #106 and #133, are atop retaining walls and will not survive construction. Please indicate how these trees will be protected throughout construction or label them for removal.

HMH Response: The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition.

Certain tree removals or associated thinning/pruning are associated with Hillside Development Guidelines for Fire Prevention. Additionally, some trees are removed as related to utility easement conflicts with canopy. The disposition updates shown are:

Removed 106, 133, 163
Lot 5: There appears to be a tree adjacent to the driveway with no I.D. number. On the T-1 sheet it looks like it could be a replacement tree, however it also shows up on the grading plans. Please confirm this tree is present or not and if not it should not be on the grading plan.

HMH Response: This tree is a proposed replacement tree and counted toward mitigation. It shall be removed from the grading plan. Tree 167 now shown for removal based on canopy conflicts with proposed utility easements and additional agency comments.

Lot 6: Tree #170 does not appear to have any construction impacts around it causing its removal.

Please indicate how this tree meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

HMH Response: The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition.

Removed 170, 171, 172
Lot 7: No remarks.

Page 442 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 23 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 7 of 4
Lot 8: No tree table on sheet 2.2, keep plan sets consistent with tree tables on the same sheets with the same data.

HMH Response: Sheet 2.2 data had to continue to 2.3 due to number of trees and site size. The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition. Certain tree removals or associated thinning/pruning are associated with Hillside Development Guidelines for Fire Prevention. The disposition updates shown are:

Saved: 610, 622, 616, 624
Lot 9: Trees #509, #510, #513, #514, #515, #517, #518, #521, #523, #524, #525, #528, #529, #530, #531, #534, #617, #620, #621, and #627 do not appear to have any construction impacts around them causing removal. Please indicate how these trees meets Town findings for removal since there are no construction or arboricultural reasons for removal.

HMH Response: The listed trees have been re-evaluated for retention and disposition.

Saved 617, 620, 621, 627
Saved 500, 647
Removed 531, 530
Lot 10: No tree table on sheet 2.2, keep plan sets consistent with tree tables on the same sheets with the same data.

Saved 182, 184, 186, 186, 188 192
Saved 195, 199, 202
Removed 191

Page 443 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 24 of 24
178 Twin Oaks Drive Arborist’s Review May 13, 2025
Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC - P.O Box 1010, Felton, CA 95018 831.331.8982 - [email protected] Page 8 of 4
Lots 11 and 12: No remarks.

Richard J. Gessner
ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #496
ISA Board Certified Master Arborist®WE-4341B
Tree Risk Assessment Qualified - Valid to 2029

Page 444 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178 Twin Oaks - Los Gatos, CA
View 1
1 EXHIBIT 10

Page 445 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178TwinOaks-LosGatos,CA
View2 2

Page 446 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178TwinOaks-LosGatos,CA
View3 3

Page 447 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178TwinOaks-LosGatos,CA
View4 4

Page 448 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
178TwinOaks-LosGatos,CA
View5
5

Page 449 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

This Page
Intentionally
Left Blank

Page 450 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From: Karen Ettinger < >
Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2025 7:45 PM
To: Council <[email protected]>
Cc: Planning <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rob Rennie <[email protected]>; Mary Badame <[email protected]>; Matthew Hudes <[email protected]>; Maria Ristow <[email protected]> Subject: SB330 & “Builder’s Remedy” Projects
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Please do not succumb to developers with greedy eyes on our sacred local environment under State Bill 330 mandates with their “Builder’s Remedy” projects designated New Town, Ace, Blossom Hill, Capri, Union 76, etc.!
Town residents (& business owners who wisely know that our town’s unique village character draws tourism) are counting on you to disallow such inner-city style density and high-rise structures that close in our beautiful open skies and mountain vistas.

The imposition of universal density across our state is a threat to quality of life in California. The threats to our very existence were made obvious by the disastrous firestorms that have wiped out so much in our state’s southern communities recently.

Dense housing increases statistical risks:
>that more accidents can occur (such as a fire in an apartment kitchen or garage) >that more innocent people can be affected (with closer and more numerous neighbors) >that emergency responses will be more difficult (to reach and provide) >that escape is hampered (by congestion)
>that illnesses are more likely to spread
>that garbage & sewage can back up
>that water & power supplies can fail
>that air quality can deteriorate
>that natural animal & vegetal environments can be destroyed.

Page 451 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

As Los Gatos homeowners since 1969 and town residents since 1968, my family values local uniqueness — as well as the different characters of all communities that contribute to our state’s diversity of heritages and lifestyles.

We welcome neighbors of any culture, faith, ethnicity, sexuality or social status; but we ask you to defend local density and design restrictions that preserve the quality of life in which all of us have invested hard work and resources.

Although homelessness is a serious concern that I share, it has many causes other than “lack of housing supply.” Universal density development will not help those most vulnerable and needy (those disabled by mental illness and/or addiction, those untrusting of offered help, some who dislike structured living, etc.) — they need better public and charitable assistance programs.

For others, I believe the lack of affordable housing supply is caused more by the predominance of ownership by real estate investor groups and individuals — some out of state and country — whose only motive for ownership is to profit by renting or “flipping” sales of multiple properties at “whatever the market will bear”. In my opinion, such ownerships should be limited by law if we are really to solve the problem of housing monopoly and affordability.

Please stand up to state mandates on local zoning regulations and join other local governments in doing so.

With thanks for your service to Los Gatos,
Karen Ettinger
Sent from my iPhone

Page 452 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From: Jon Witkin
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2025 11:57 AM
To: Joel Paulson <[email protected]>
Cc: Gabrielle Whelan <[email protected]>; Sean Mullin <[email protected]>; Erin Walters <[email protected]>; Susan Burnett
Subject: 178 twin oaks drive proposed development
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
3-30-2025
Joel Paulson
Community development director
Town of Los Gatos
110 east Main Street
Los Gatos, ca. 95030
Copy to Whelan, Mullin and Walters
Hi Joel
My first letter was for the allowed two minutes at the Tuesday town council meeting. That agenda item has been removed from the meeting. I thought I should forward it. The second Letter is what my attorney thought was important for your consideration. We are already experiencing extreme congestion during certain periods. Anything we can accomplish to minimize this project size and impact would be appreciated.

Thank you
Jon witkin

Page 453 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 454 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 455 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2025 9:55 PM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Online Form Submission #15863 for Community Development Contact Form [EXTERNAL SENDER]
Community Development Contact Form
First Name Field not completed.

Last Name Field not completed.

Email Address
(Required)
Phone Number Field not completed.

Tell Us About Your
Inquiry (Required)
Comment Regarding A Planning Project
Address/APN you are
inquiring About
(Required)
143-151 E. Main St
Message (Required) Letter to Council requesting EIR for SB 330 projects Add An Attachment if
applicable
scan0789.pdf
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Page 456 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 457 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 458 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 459 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 460 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 461 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 462 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 463 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 464 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 4:33 PM
To: Planning <[email protected]>
Subject: Online Form Submission #15928 for Community Development Contact Form [EXTERNAL SENDER]
Community Development Contact Form
First Name Brent
Last Name Ventura
Email Address
(Required)
Phone Number
Tell Us About Your
Inquiry (Required)
Comment Regarding A Planning Project
Address/APN you are
inquiring About
(Required)
178 Twin Oaks Rd.

Message (Required) Letter requesting EIR for project
Add An Attachment if
applicable
scan0791.pdf
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Page 465 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 466 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 467 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 468 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 469 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 470 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 471 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 472 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 473 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From: Shani Kleinhaus <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2025 12:17 PM
To: Erin Walters <[email protected]>; Planning <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Dodder <[email protected]>; James Eggers <[email protected]>; Katja Irvin < >; Jill Fordyce Subject: Comments on Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Surrey Farms Estates (SCH No. 2025090920)
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Dear Ms. Walters and Members of the Planning Commission, The Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance (SCVBA) and the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter (SCLP) respectfully submit the following comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).

Respectfully,
Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D.

Environmental Advocate
Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance
22221 McClellan Rd.

Cupertino, CA 95014
650-868-2114
[email protected]

Page 474 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Erin Walters, Senior Planner
[email protected]
Planning Commission
[email protected]
Town of Los Gatos
110 E. Main Street
Los Gatos, CA 95030
October 17, 2025
Subject: Comments on Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for Surrey Farms Estates (SCH No. 2025090920)
Dear Ms. Walters and Members of the Planning Commission, The Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance (SCVBA) and the Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter (SCLP) respectfully submit the following comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the proposed Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision at 178 Twin Oaks Drive. SCVBA is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the protection of birds, other wildlife, and their habitats across Santa Clara County. The Sierra Club mission is to promote the responsible use of the earth's ecosystems and resources.

As conservation organizations with members who live, recreate, and observe wildlife in Los Gatos and the Ross Creek watershed, we have a direct and substantial interest in ensuring full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Our long history of engagement in environmental review involving riparian corridors, oak woodlands, and hillside developments reflects our commitment to protecting regional biodiversity and ecological integrity. Given the project’s location adjacent to critical habitat and wildlife movement corridors, rigorous environmental review is essential.

Page 475 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Based on our review of the IS/MND and the recent October 2025 comment letter from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), we find substantial evidence that the project may result in significant hydrological and biological impacts that are not adequately disclosed, analyzed, or mitigated. As detailed below, the IS/MND fails to address the jurisdictional status of an on-site ephemeral drainage, potential dewatering of riparian habitat, habitat fragmentation for wildlife, impacts from lighting and collision hazards to birds, and procedural conflicts with CEQA’s fair argument standard.

For these reasons, the Town must withdraw the IS/MND and prepare a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to ensure adequate environmental review in compliance with CEQA.

Project Overview and Summary of Environmental Concerns
The proposed Surrey Farms Estates project would subdivide approximately 17.5 acres within a hillside area at 178 Twin Oaks Drive, to construct multiple single-family residences, internal roadways, driveways, and associated infrastructure. The site includes oak woodland, sloped topography, and an ephemeral drainage feature that ultimately conveys runoff toward Ross Creek. Despite the project’s location within an ecologically sensitive transition zone between existing development and natural hillside habitat, the IS/MND concludes that all potential impacts can be mitigated to less-than-significant levels without the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

However, substantial evidence in the record, including evidence provided in the October 2025 comment letter from the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), demonstrates that the project may cause significant environmental impacts that have not been fully evaluated or mitigated. These include, but are not limited to:
● Hydrologic impacts to a potentially jurisdictional ephemeral creek, including diversion of contributing stormwater flows that may result in dewatering of riparian vegetation, ● Loss and fragmentation of biological habitat, including oak woodland, wildlife corridors, and breeding/nesting habitat for birds, raptors, and pollinators such as Crotch’s Bumble Bee,
● Unaddressed light pollution and bird collision risks associated with hillside residential development and night lighting at the wildland–urban interface, and ● Procedural deficiencies under CEQA, including reliance on deferred mitigation, absence of required agency consultation, and disregard of substantial evidence submitted by a responsible agency.

Page 476 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Under CEQA’s “fair argument” standard (Guidelines §§15064, 15065), the existence of substantial evidence supporting a reasonable possibility of significant effects mandates preparation of an EIR. The presence of unresolved agency disagreement, particularly from the RWQCB, a responsible agency with jurisdiction over waters of the State, further compels elevation of environmental review. These omissions provide substantial evidence of a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment, requiring preparation of an EIR under CEQA Guidelines §§15064 and 15065.

Accordingly, SCVBA and SCLP submit that adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be legally improper, and that a full Environmental Impact Report is required to analyze, disclose, and mitigate the project’s hydrologic, ecological, and cumulative impacts.

I. Hydrology and Waters of the State: Dewatering, Jurisdiction, and RWQCB Conflict The IS/MND fails to properly evaluate or mitigate significant hydrologic impacts to an on-site ephemeral drainage that is subject to potential jurisdiction by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). The document relies exclusively on a determination by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding federal jurisdiction, while omitting State jurisdictional standards under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and Fish and Game Code §1602.

A. Unresolved Jurisdiction over Waters of the State
The IS/MND asserts that the on-site ephemeral drainage is “non-jurisdictional,” yet it provides no confirmation or concurrence from RWQCB or CDFW. This omission directly conflicts with the RWQCB’s October 2025 comment letter, which reiterates the agency’s ongoing concern:
“Ten years after our initial comment letter, we remain concerned that the extent of waters subject to the jurisdiction of the Water Board and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife… has not been confirmed… Until jurisdiction is determined, the Project should assume that the ephemeral creek is a water of the State.” Waters of the State are defined independently of federal jurisdiction and include seasonal and ephemeral drainages under the Porter-Cologne Act. Failure to acknowledge jurisdiction of a State-regulated waterway constitutes a procedural and substantive CEQA flaw, as the project may require Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) or Clean Water Act §401 certification from RWQCB, and a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA) from CDFW.

B. Diversion and Dewatering of Riparian Flow
Current site hydrology supports riparian vegetation and wildlife habitat along the ephemeral drainage. The IS/MND proposes bioretention basins and pervious pavements designed to divert

Page 477 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
stormwater runoff into storm drains, away from the natural drainage. As RWQCB emphasizes:
“Stormwater runoff that currently supports riparian vegetation along the ephemeral creek would be diverted… This could deprive riparian vegetation of sufficient water to sustain the vegetation, a significant impact to the creek.” The MND does not contain any hydromodification management analysis, despite the Town’s obligations under the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP). No measures are provided to maintain base flows, protect channel stability, or preserve riparian hydrology.

C. Inconsistency with the Los Gatos General Plan
The Los Gatos General Plan calls for protection of riparian corridors, habitat connectivity, and natural hydrologic functions. An ephemeral creek that supports riparian growth is subject to these protections, and cannot be dismissed without agency consultation or hydrological analysis.

D. Lack of Enforceable Maintenance and Ownership Measures The IS/MND defers long-term maintenance to a future homeowners’ association (HOA), without identifying:
● Responsibility for inspection and repair of stormwater infrastructure, ● Funding mechanisms for hydrologic mitigation, or
● Standards for performance over time.

Deferred mitigation violates CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(B), which prohibits mitigation dependent on undefined future actions.

Conclusion on Hydrology
Because substantial evidence demonstrates the potential for significant hydrologic impacts - including dewatering of a State-regulated waterway - CEQA mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. The IS/MND must be withdrawn or recirculated to address these deficiencies.

II. Bird Collisions with Glass

Page 478 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Bird collisions with glass are one of the leading human-caused sources of bird mortality in North America. Scientists estimate that up to one billion birds die each year in the United States from collisions with buildings and transparent or reflective surfaces. This is not a marginal issue; it is a primary driver in the continent-wide decline of bird populations, including species already stressed by habitat loss, climate change, and drought.

Birds do not perceive glass as a barrier. They see reflected sky or vegetation and attempt to fly through it, or they see a direct line of habitat through a structure and follow a “line of flight”, often fatally. While some environmental documents briefly acknowledge reflective glass, a truly protective approach must also address clear glass and see-through conditions, such as parallel glass façades or corridors that create direct flight paths through structures, as well as stand-alone glass elements such as balcony railings.

These features can be especially hazardous in hillside or riparian-edge developments, where migrating and resident birds move through tree canopy or along drainages. Local oak woodland and creek corridors serve as flyways for warblers, thrushes, towhees, and raptors, species that cannot adapt to invisible barriers.

Los Gatos General Plan Recognizes Bird Collision Risk
Importantly, the Town of Los Gatos 2040 General Plan explicitly acknowledges bird collisions as a serious environmental concern and commits to requiring safer building design.

Under the Environment and Sustainability Element, the Town states:
“Require new development to increase bird safety by reducing hazardous building and architectural elements, and including bird safe and lighting design.” The General Plan further anticipates a dedicated Bird Safety Ordinance to reduce collisions with windows and regulate hazardous materials and lighting:
“Adopt a Bird Safety Ordinance to reduce bird collisions with windows… regulate building design and lighting implementation.”
Despite these commitments, the environmental document does not analyze bird collision hazards nor propose any bird-safe measures for glazing, transparency, or façade design.

This absence creates a direct inconsistency between the project and the Town’s adopted policy direction.

Architectural Collision Hazards That Must Be Addressed
Basic bird-safe design is especially critical in hillside and riparian-edge developments where migratory routes cross tree canopies and drainages. Hazardous features include:

Page 479 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
● Expansive reflective glass facing vegetation
● Parallel or transparent façades creating “line-of-flight” conditions, and ● Glass balcony railings, corner glazing, and atriums that create illusions of open passage
These features are known to cause high-speed bird strikes, a long-term operational impact that CEQA requires agencies to identify and mitigate.

CEQA Requires Addressing Operational Wildlife Mortality CEQA evaluates not only temporary construction effects but long-term biological impacts from the operation of the built environment. Because bird-glass collision mortality is foreseeable, preventable, and recognized in Town policy, it must be mitigated at the project level through enforceable measures such as patterned glazing, reduced reflectivity, and design alterations to eliminate see-through corridors.

Conclusion
Given the Town of Los Gatos’ explicit policy to “increase bird safety by reducing hazardous building elements,” it is essential that this project incorporate bird-safe architectural standards.

Absent such measures, the project would perpetuate a known and significant source of avoidable wildlife mortality, inconsistent with both CEQA and the Town’s own General Plan.

III. Artificial Lighting (ALAN) and Impacts on Wildlife and Ecological Health Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) poses significant and well-documented impacts on wildlife, ecological function, and human health. While the environmental document discusses lighting only from an aesthetic or glare perspective, the evaluation of lighting impacts on biological resources, including migratory birds, nocturnal wildlife, and ecosystems is warranted. Light is not merely a visual issue, it is a biological force that disrupts circadian systems, navigation, foraging, predator-prey behavior, and reproductive timing.

Los Gatos General Plan: Lighting is a Biological Resource Concern The Town of Los Gatos 2040 General Plan expressly recognizes lighting as an environmental impact affecting wildlife, not just visual character. Under the Environment and Sustainability Element, the Town directs:
“Require the design of building, street, landscape, and parking area lighting to improve safety, energy efficiency, protection of the night skies (dark sky

Page 480 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
protections), biological resources, and environmental soundness.” The General Plan also calls for a Dark Skies Ordinance to minimize ecological disruption:
“Adopt a Dark Skies Ordinance … to regulate exterior lighting, skyglow, and impacts to wildlife.”
Despite these adopted policy commitments, the MND does not analyze lighting impacts on wildlife movement, riparian corridors, or nocturnal species. It treats lighting solely in terms of visual compatibility with surrounding homes, overlooking its ecological consequences.

Scientific Basis: Why ALAN Is an Ecological Impact
Peer-reviewed research has shown that nighttime lighting causes the following:
● Disorients migrating birds, pulling them off-route into developed areas where collision risk increases,
● Disrupts circadian hormones in wildlife and humans by suppressing melatonin, ● Alters predator–prey dynamics, favoring some species (rats, crows) over others (owls, bats), and
● Reduces insect populations, which cascades upward to birds and bats reliant on them.

Blue-rich light (high CCT LEDs) is especially harmful. The spectral range of 4000–5000K commonly used in development has been linked to higher disorientation and physiological stress in wildlife. Warm-spectrum lighting at 2700 Kelvin or below significantly reduces ecological disruption.

Location Sensitivity: Hillsides and Riparian Zones
Lighting impacts are particularly severe at the urban–wildland interface, such as hillside developments bordering Ross Creek and oak woodland. These areas support nighttime movement of the following:
● Owls (Great Horned, Barn Owl),
● Bats and nocturnal pollinators, and

Page 481 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
● Migratory thrushes, warblers, and tanagers navigating by starlight.

General Plan implementation guidance even identifies riparian corridor lighting as an ecological concern requiring directional control:
“Require careful lighting design in and near natural riparian corridors to direct light away and maximize the distance between nighttime lighting and the corridor.” This heightened sensitivity is entirely absent in the MND.

Recommended Mitigation – Consistent with General Plan
To comply with CEQA and align with General Plan sustainability goals, outdoor lighting should incorporate the following:
● Full shielding and downward direction (no uplight, no spill into habitat), ● 2700K or lower color temperature to minimize harmful blue light, ● Automatic shut-off or curfews after 10:00 PM, except motion-activated security lighting, and
● No unshielded façade or landscape lighting near riparian or canopy edges.

Conclusion on Lighting
By omitting wildlife analysis and relying solely on human visual standards, the MND fails to address a documented environmental impact recognized in both science and Town policy.

Effective lighting mitigation must protect ecological function, not just visual ambiance. A full EIR is warranted to evaluate operational lighting impacts in this sensitive hillside and riparian environment.

IV. Biological and Wildlife Impacts: Habitat Loss, Fragmentation, and Special-Status Species The IS/MND fails to adequately assess significant and irreversible impacts to biological resources, including native woodland habitat, wildlife movement corridors, nesting birds, and special-status pollinators. The project lies within a transitional zone between developed hillside residences and the Ross Creek watershed, an area known to support raptors, migratory songbirds, and oak-associated wildlife. The document’s reliance on generic pre-construction surveys does not satisfy CEQA’s requirements for identification, analysis, and mitigation of long-term habitat impacts.

Page 482 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

A. Oak Woodland and Habitat Fragmentation
The project would remove a substantial number of mature coast live oaks and associated understory vegetation. Oak woodlands provide critical foraging, roosting, and nesting habitat for species such as Acorn Woodpecker, American Kestrel, Red-Shouldered Hawk, and multiple migratory warblers. Despite the scale of proposed vegetation clearing, the IS/MND does not quantify total tree loss, assess habitat fragmentation, or evaluate impacts to wildlife corridor functionality across the Ross Creek drainage interface.

Fragmentation of woodland habitat at this location poses long-term ecological consequences, including reduced canopy continuity, loss of acorn mast availability, and disruption of species movement between hillside and riparian zones. CEQA requires disclosure and mitigation of such impacts (Guidelines §15380), which the MND does not provide.

B. Riparian Dependency and Loss of Hydrologic Support
The IS/MND acknowledges the presence of an ephemeral drainage but incorrectly concludes there will be no biological impact. As documented by the RWQCB, the project’s stormwater design would redirect runoff away from the drainage, depriving the riparian system of seasonal hydrology:
“Stormwater runoff that currently supports riparian vegetation… would be diverted… This could deprive riparian vegetation of sufficient water to sustain the vegetation.”
The biological effects of hydrologic alteration, loss of vegetative cover, reduced insect prey availability, and increased temperature exposure, were not analyzed.

C. Nesting Birds and Raptors: Inadequate Mitigation
The site supports habitat suitable for breeding birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code §3503. However, the IS/MND proposes only seasonal nest surveys, deferring species protection to future conditions. CEQA prohibits reliance on deferred mitigation in place of substantive analysis. Permanent loss of nesting and roosting habitat is not mitigated by temporal surveying.

Raptor species such as Red-tailed Hawk, Cooper’s Hawk, and Great Horned Owl are known to utilize this region. The MND does not analyze displacement, loss of hunting perches, or effects on prey availability.

D. Special-Status Pollinators: Omission of Crotch’s Bumble Bee

Page 483 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

The IS/MND omits any analysis of special-status invertebrates, including Crotch’s Bumble Bee (Bombus crotchii), a California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate species. This omission violates CEQA Guidelines §15380, which requires treatment of candidate species as threatened or endangered. Oak-woodland and chaparral-edge habitats within Santa Clara County are within the known range of this species.

No botanical or pollinator surveys appear to have been conducted.

Conclusion on Biological Impacts
The MND fails to disclose the scale of habitat conversion, analyze biological connectivity, or mitigate for permanent ecological loss. Substantial evidence supports a fair argument that the project may have significant biological impacts, requiring a full Environmental Impact Report.

V. CEQA Procedural Failures: Reliance on an MND is Legally Improper The IS/MND for Surrey Farms Estates does not comply with the procedural requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Multiple deficiencies in analysis, consultation, and mitigation demonstrate that reliance on a Mitigated Negative Declaration is legally improper.

Under CEQA’s “fair argument” standard, the presence of substantial evidence supporting a significant impact mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

A. Failure to Apply the Fair Argument Standard
CEQA Guidelines §15064(f)(1) requires an EIR where substantial evidence indicates a project may have a significant effect on the environment, even if the lead agency believes impacts can be mitigated. In this case, expert agency evidence from the RWQCB clearly disputes the MND’s conclusions on hydrology and biological impacts. Disagreement among experts requires an EIR, not an MND.

B. Deferral of Mitigation and Absence of Performance Standards The IS/MND repeatedly defers mitigation to future plans, HOA oversight, or permitting processes, without defining performance standards or enforceable obligations. This violates CEQA Guidelines §15126.4(a)(1)(B), which prohibits reliance on unspecified or future mitigation, particularly where long-term resource impacts are involved (e.g., habitat loss, hydrology modification).

Examples of impermissible deferral include the following:
● Stormwater operation and maintenance left to an undefined HOA,

Page 484 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
● Lack of binding commitments to preserve riparian flow or tree canopy, and ● Absence of defined mitigation ratios for habitat or tree removal.

C. Failure to Recirculate After New Substantial Evidence (RWQCB 2025 Letter) The October 2025 RWQCB comment letter introduces substantial new evidence that the project may significantly impact waters of the State. Under CEQA Guidelines §15088.5, a lead agency must recirculate an environmental document when new information shows the project will result in new or substantially more severe impacts than previously disclosed. The Town did not recirculate, thereby depriving decision-makers and the public of a full review.

D. Misapplication of Housing Laws Does Not Exempt CEQA
While the project appears to invoke the Builder’s Remedy provisions under Government Code §65589.5, CEQA remains fully applicable. Housing law does not waive or reduce CEQA review.

Courts have consistently held that compliance with CEQA is mandatory and independent of zoning or housing authorization. The IS/MND’s approach suggests environmental review is secondary to entitlement, which is legally incorrect.

Conclusion on Procedural Failures
The procedural shortcomings of the IS/MND, combined with substantive omissions in hydrology, biology, and lighting, render it legally indefensible under CEQA. A full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required to ensure compliance with state environmental law and to provide accurate assessment, disclosure, and mitigation of the project’s impacts.

VI. Conclusion and Request for Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report For the reasons outlined in the sections above, the Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance finds that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Surrey Farms Estates project is inadequate under CEQA. Substantial evidence in the record, including technical comment from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, demonstrates that the project may cause significant environmental impacts that have not been fully analyzed, disclosed, or mitigated. These include potential dewatering of Waters of the State, permanent loss of biological habitat, wildlife disturbance from lighting, and unmitigated operational effects.

Under CEQA Guidelines §§15064 and 15065, a Mitigated Negative Declaration cannot be adopted where substantial evidence supports a fair argument of significant impact. Furthermore, CEQA Guidelines §15088.5 requires recirculation when new information indicates the potential for new or more severe impacts, as is the case with RWQCB’s October 2025 letter.

Page 485 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Accordingly, SCVBA and SCLP respectfully requests the following from the Town of Los Gatos:

1. Withdraw the Mitigated Negative Declaration,

2. Recirculate the environmental document to incorporate agency concerns and hydrologic and biological analysis, and

3. Prepare a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that evaluates project alternatives, hydrologic modifications, biological resource impacts, lighting effects, and cumulative conditions within the Ross Creek watershed.

The EIR must also include a reasonable range of alternatives that would reduce impacts to hydrology, wildlife corridors, and hillside habitat, as required under CEQA.

We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments and remain available to participate in future consultation, provide biological expertise, and ensure that environmental review for this site reflects the region’s ecological values and legal standards. Please include these comments in the administrative record for this project.

Respectfully,
Shani Kleinhaus, Ph.D.

Environmental Advocate
Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance
Katja Irvin, AICP
Guadalupe Group Conservation Chair
Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter

Page 486 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Page 487 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

I. History of Surrey Farms Neighborhood and Previous Development Proposals for This Site
In 1956, the original Surrey Farms Development CC&Rs were recorded. In the mid1970’s, the last four houses on Longmeadow (185-191) were built. Around this same time, the Town was considering making Longmeadow a through-street, connecting to Kennedy and Shannon. That project was ultimately denied, primarily due to neighborhood resistance to the idea of transforming the quiet, closed Surrey Farms neighborhood into a thoroughfare. Around this time, it appears that similar proposals to extend Cerro Vista and Brooke Acres were also denied, making all three of these neighborhoods “cul de sac neighborhoods.” In September 1974, residents of the Surrey Farms neighborhood submitted a petition regarding “the future of Longmeadow Drive as it affects Surrey Farm.” Discussing the proposed development of the last four homes on the street, Mrs. Lila June McGrath wrote: “If this proposed development assures the termination (i.e., deadend) of the road added onto Longmeadow Drive in the vicinity of Ross Creek, our grievance is diminished. This was the plan originally submitted by the developers with the blessing of the town government. If, on the other hand, this added-on road, at Longmeadow Dr. paves the way to ultimately turning Longmeadow Drive into a through-way from Kennedy Road to Shannon Road, the residents of Surrey Farm would strongly oppose the attachment of any public road...” Mrs. McGrath sites three areas of concern held by the Surrey Farms residents of the mid1970s: “(1) the possible destruction of Surrey Farm as we now enjoy it and as we were assured it would remain; (2) the potential increase in pedestrian and traffic hazard; (3) A thought that the termination of Longmeadow Drive at Ross Creek might be a wholesome, intelligent and most

Page 488 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
logical place to call a halt to this never ending maze of interlocking roadway, and to this checkerboard square mentality we seem to be facing.”
Ultimately, the Town agreed with Mrs. McGrath, and our home (191 Longmeadow Drive) and the Meleyco home (189 Longmeadow) became the end of Longmeadow, in a cul de sac, terminating any thought that Longmeadow—and indeed Surrey Farms—would have a connecting street.

On February 2, 1975, Bob and Dorothy Dodge and the Town of Los Gatos entered into a Land Conservation Contract with regard to the property in question, which now constituted the backdrop of the entire, and fully-developed Surrey Farms neighborhood. The contract itself stated that: “The property is located in an agricultural preserve established by the Town.” The intent of the original Land Conservation Contract was to preserve the rural quality of the land, recognizing that the maintenance of open space and land of rural character holds significant value. It also gave a significant tax benefit to the landowner. This property has never been used for agricultural purposes, at least since 1948 (according to the Town), which pre-dates the Williamson Act contract.

On March 19, 1975, just after the Land Conservation Contract was signed and the decision to terminate Longmeadow was made, the Town Council approved the four-lot subdivision at the end of Longmeadow.

On May 8, 1975, a Cerro Vista Court extension road was denied by the Planning Commission. Thereafter, residents of Brooke Acres reasoned there would no longer be a road to connect to, and requested that Brooke Acres also be developed as a cul de sac “for the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood, also by reasons of Sec. 1.4 Purpose of Ord. 867 (Zoning).”

Page 489 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

On June 16, 1975, an ordinance was passed by the Town Council to rezone the hillside from HR-1:20 to RC.

In 1975, 187 Longmeadow was built.

On January 1, 1976, the first term of the Williamson commenced.

In 1976, 185, 189 and 191 Longmeadow were built.

These last four residences were constructed to end Longmeadow Drive in a manner that would assure that Surrey Farms would not encroach on Ross Creek and the floodplain and would not have a through street; and the proposal to create roads from Cerro Vista and Brooke Acres were denied and, thus all three surrounding neighborhoods became landlocked.

Prior to purchasing our home at 191 Longmeadow Drive in February 1999, we went to the Town and inquired as to the likelihood of the hill (proposed project site) being developed.

Noting that it was Resource Conservation space, the clerk told us “not in your lifetime.” In 2016, the applicant herein submitted an application to cancel the Williamson Act Contract and to approve a ten-home planned development on the site. In August 2017, the Town prepared an EIR on the proposed project. According to the IS/MND, “although the project has since changed and the EIR was never certified by the Town, the setting of the site has remained the same and, thus, a number of the technical reports associated with the former project and 2017 EIR remain applicable to the proposed project.” (IS/MND p. 6)
On October 9, 2016, we submitted comments in response to the DEIR, which discussed all of the problems with regard to the project. Those comments are incorporated into the EIR as “Letter D - Fordyce Family” (pages 2-44 to 2-92). (The Town’s response to our comments can be found in the EIR at pages 2-93 to 2-108). We also submitted a response to the RDEIR on June 19, 2017, and to the Final EIR on February 28, 2018. Given that a number of the technical

Page 490 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
reports associated with the former project are relied upon for the current project, we request that those documents, as well the entirety of the previous EIR be included in the record herein.

On May 1, 2018, the Town Council voted unanimously to decline a request to cancel the Williamson Act contract, thereby rejecting the proposed project. In reaching this decision, the Town Council acknowledged that the Williamson Act contract would expire in April 2025 and expressed a desire to find a way to permanently preserve the hill as open space and/or create a development plan that preserves a majority of the hillside as open space. The Town Council also specifically acknowledged that rural hillsides like this are part of the Town’s essential identity and should be preserved.

In 2023, Robson Homes submitted a proposal to subdivide this same property into 12 parcels and construct 11 detached single family residences, 11 ADU’s, and 2 BMP units in the form of attached single-family residential units to the town’s Conceptual Development Advisory Committee (Application CD-23-001). In response to a notification and call for comments by the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee, we provided our 2018 submission in opposition to the previous proposed development, which outlined many of the issues confronting any proposed development of the property. The Conceptual Development Committee expressed the following concerns regarding the proposed Robson project: too many homes; the potential for even more structures with ADUs; the increase in traffic; fire access; the potential for increased water runoff; the loss of open space; the need for hillside preservation and wildlife corridors; overall impacts to environment and existing neighborhood; impact of increased density on fire safety and rain/erosion; a single ingress and egress. One commissioner noted that in 2023, the project has to be evaluated differently than in 2018 because of SB 9 and ADU’s, noting that there would have to be a fair amount of less units. Another stated that there must be fewer homes for

Page 491 ends

ITEM NO. 1.
many reasons including ingress/egress/access, the “real burden” on the neighborhood, and the water and drainage issues. Another summarized the recommendations of the Conceptual Design Committee as follows: the number of units proposed is excessive; the fire risk is severe; there should be the bare minimum for density; and the development needs to comply with hillside standards and guidelines. (Conceptual Development Advisory Committee Meeting April 12, 2023).

It should also be noted that before the proposed Robson development was before the Conceptual Design Advisory Committee, we were approached by Robson Homes to determine what they could do to mitigate the effects of the proposed project on the neighborhood. This included, among other things, discussion of a grove of trees in between the proposed development and the property lines along Longmeadow and Twin Oaks, and the possibility of deeding a portion of land to adjacent properties to ensure privacy.

To date, we have not been approached by the developer of the current proposed project to determine what, if anything, could be done to lessen the impact on the neighborhood and specifically, the homes directly adjacent to the site. We are unaware of this current proposed project going before the Conceptual Development Advisory Committee; therefore, this is our first opportunity to formally present our concerns with regard to the current proposed project to the Town.

One final note: over the years, many of us have been told by original Surrey Farms residents that there was a deal struck between the Town of Los Gatos and Bob Dodge during the time he was developing the neighborhood. According to that deal, he would get a certain density if the hill was preserved as resource conservation space and the rural backdrop to the developed neighborhood. I have not been able to find evidence of this deal in Town records, as the Planning

Page 492 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Commission and Town Council documents from this time period are sparse and not digitized; however, it should be noted that the Williamson Act contract entered into between Bob and Dorothy Dodge and the Town included the language: “The property is located in an agricultural preserve established by the Town.”

Page 493 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

From:

Sent: Friday, December 5, 2025 4:34 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: 178 Twin Oaks Drive
Dear Ms. Walters,
The purpose of this note is to express serious concern about the Bioretention Basin (pond, man made wetland) proposed for this development.

In my judgment, the need for this pond is a clear indicator that the drainage from the proposed development will exceed the natural drainage capability of the land. The proposed development should be modified to eliminate this pond. Examples of options that should be considered are reducing the scope of the development such that the drainage will not require the pond or redesigning the drainage system, so it is completely underground (i.e. connecting it to the storm drain system serving the rest of Surrey Farm).

The pond as proposed will cause the accumulation of stagnant water which in turn will cause infestation of mosquitoes. The risk of West Nile Virus Disease transmitted by mosquitoes, which can be neurologically damaging as well as fatal, is unacceptable near the neighborhoods and school surrounding the proposed development. The lack of clarity about who will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the pond will only exacerbate this risk.

In summary, the Planning Commission should direct the developer to create an alternative plan that will not require this pond and which will not have risk of flooding of the adjoining communities.

Sincerely Yours,
Christopher Bajorek
Los Gatos, CA 95032

Page 494 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project
1 November 2025

INTRODUCTION
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires all State and local agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency whenever approval involves the adoption of either a “mitigated negative declaration” or specified environmental findings related to environmental impact reports.

The following is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project (proposed project). The intent of the MMRP is to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for this project. Unless otherwise noted, the cost of implementing the mitigation measures as prescribed by this MMRP shall be funded by the applicant.

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
The MMRP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the IS/MND for the proposed project, prepared by the Town of Los Gatos. This MMRP is intended to be used by Town staff and mitigation monitoring personnel to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during project implementation. Mitigation measures identified in this MMRP were developed in the IS/MND that was prepared for the proposed project. The MMRP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary and in-the-field identification and resolution of environmental concerns.

The proposed project IS/MND presents a detailed set of mitigation measures that will be implemented throughout the lifetime of the proposed project. Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines, Section 15370, as a measure that:
• Avoids the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; • Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation;
• Rectifies the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment; • Reduces or eliminates the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project; or
• Compensates for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

Monitoring and documenting the implementation of mitigation measures will be coordinated by the Town of Los Gatos. The applicant will be responsible for fully understanding and effectively implementing the mitigation measures contained within the MMRP. The Town will be responsible for monitoring compliance.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The following table indicates the item number, the checklist questions the measure is designed to address, the measure text, the monitoring agency, implementation schedule, and an area for sign-off indicating compliance.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM
EXHIBIT 12

Page 495 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project
2 November 2025

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

SURREY FARMS ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROJECT
Item
Number Checklist Question Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
SignOff
III. Air Quality
III-a;
III-b
Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality
plan; or result in a
cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air quality
standard?
III-1 The project applicant shall show on
Improvement Plans via notation that the
project contractor shall restrict the construction
of the off-site sidewalk improvements along
the north side of Blossom Hill Road between
Regent Drive and Union Avenue and along the
north side of Fisher Avenue between Mitchell
Avenue and Roberts Road from occurring
simultaneously with the on-site construction of
the proposed project.

Alternatively, if simultaneous construction of
the on-site and off-site components of the
proposed project cannot be avoided, prior to
the initiation of ground disturbance associated
with the off-site sidewalk improvements, the
project applicant shall show on project
improvement plans via notation the following
requirements:
• The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment greater than
50 horsepower to be used in the
construction of the off-site sidewalk
improvements, including owned,
leased, and subcontractor vehicles,
shall be Tier 4 final off-road
construction equipment. In addition,
all off-road equipment operating at the
off-site construction site must be
maintained in proper working
condition according to manufacturer’s
specifications.
• Idling shall be limited to five minutes or
less in accordance with the In-Use OffTown of Los
Gatos Parks and
Public Works
Department
Prior to improvement
plans approval or
prior to the initiation
of ground
disturbance
associated with the
off-site sidewalk
improvements

Page 496 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project
3 November 2025

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

SURREY FARMS ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROJECT
Item
Number Checklist Question Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
SignOff
Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation as
required by CARB. Clear signage
regarding idling restrictions shall be
placed at the entrances to the
construction site.
• Portable equipment over 50
horsepower must have either a valid
BAAQMD Permit to Operate (PTO) or
a valid statewide Portable Equipment
Registration Program (PERP) placard
and sticker issued by CARB.

Conformance with the foregoing requirements
shall be confirmed through review and
approval of plans by the Town of Los Gatos
Parks and Public Works Department.

IV. Biological Resources
IV-a Have a substantial
adverse effect, either
directly or through
habitat modifications, on
any species identified
as a candidate,
sensitive, or special
status species in local
or regional plans,
policies, or regulations,
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
California Red-Legged Frog
IV-1 Within 48 hours prior to any ground disturbing
activities or vegetation clearing within 50 feet
of Ross Creek, a pre-construction survey for
California red-legged frog shall be conducted
by a qualified biologist. Survey results shall be
submitted to the Town of Los Gatos
Community Development Department.

IV-2 If California red-legged frog is encountered,
activities shall cease until the animal moves
out of any proposed work area on its own or is
relocated by a permitted qualified biologist.

Proof of compliance with this mitigation
measure shall be provided to the Town of Los
Gatos Community Development Department.

Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
Within 48 hours prior
to any ground
disturbing activities
or vegetation
clearing within 50
feet of Ross Creek
If California redlegged frog is
encountered

Page 497 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project
4 November 2025

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

SURREY FARMS ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROJECT
Item
Number Checklist Question Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
SignOff
IV-3 During construction activities, fiber netting
such as silt fence or similar material shall be
used for erosion control where appropriate
throughout the project site and within 50 feet of
Ross Creek to ensure that California redlegged frog does not get trapped. Proof of compliance with this mitigation measure shall
be provided to the Town of Los Gatos
Community Development Department.

White-Tailed Kite and Other Nesting Raptors
and Migratory Birds
IV-4 If tree removal or ground disturbing activities
are scheduled to commence during the
nesting season (February 1st through August
31st), a pre-construction nesting bird survey
shall be conducted by a qualified biologist
within seven days prior to such activities to
identify possible nesting activity. Survey
results shall be submitted to the Town of Los
Gatos Community Development Department.

If active nests are not found further mitigation
is not required. If one or more active nests are
found, a construction-free buffer of suitable
dimensions shall be established around any
active raptor or migratory bird nest for the
duration of the project, or until the qualified
biologist has determined that the chicks have
fledged and are foraging independently from
their parents. The buffer shall be identified on
the ground with flagging or fencing. The buffer
distance shall be determined by the on-site
qualified biologist based on the species, level
of disturbance activity, location of the nest, and
the topography between the nest and the
Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
During construction
activities
Within seven days
prior to tree removal
or ground disturbing
activities, if such
activities are
scheduled to
commence during
the nesting season
(February 1st through
August 31st)

Page 498 ends

ITEM NO. 1.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Surrey Farms Estates Subdivision Project
5 November 2025

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

SURREY FARMS ESTATES SUBDIVISION PROJECT
Item
Number Checklist Question Mitigation Measure
Monitoring
Agency
Implementation
Schedule
SignOff
construction activity; the construction-free
buffer shall consist of a minimum starting
distance of 250 feet for raptors and 25 feet for
other birds. Proof of compliance with this
mitigation measure shall be provided to the
Town of Los Gatos Community Development
Department.

Pallid Bat and Townsend’s Big-Eared Bat
IV-5 Prior to the commencement of construction
activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a
bat habitat assessment of all potential roosting
habitat features, including trees within the
proposed impact footprint within the project
vicinity. The habitat assessment shall identify
all potentially suitable roosting habitat and may
be conducted up to one year prior to the start
of construction. The results of the assessment
shall be submitted to the Town of Los Gatos
Community Development Department.

IV-6 If potential roosting habitat is identified
(cavities in trees or potential roosts within
structures) within the areas proposed for
impact, the biologist shall survey the potential
roosting habitat during the active season
(generally April through October or from
January through March on days with
temperatures in excess of 50 degrees
Fahrenheit) within seven days prior to the start
of construction activities to determine the
presence of roosting bats. The surveys are
recommended to be conducted utilizing
methods that are considered acceptable by
CDFW and bat experts. Methods may include
evening emergence surveys, acoustic
Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
Town of Los
Gatos Planning
Division
Up to one year prior
to the
commencement of
construction
activities
Within seven days
prior to the start of
construction
activities, if potential
roosting habitat is
identified (cavities in
trees or potential
roosts within
structures) within the
areas proposed for
impact

Page 499 ends

Los Gatos City CouncilAugust 11, 2026

Los Gatos City Council
August 11, 2026