Loyalton City Council
December 20, 2022

AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE

LOYALTON CITY COUNCIL
6:00 P.M. – CITY HALL AUDITORIUM
605 SCHOOL STREET
DECEMBER 20TH, 2022
NEXT ORDINANCE #425
NEXT RESOLUTION NO. 8-2022

AGENDA & PACKET AVAILABLE ON CITY WEB SITE
cityofloyalton.org
Any person with a disability may submit a request for reasonable modification or accommodation to the above-described means for accessing and offering comment at the meeting to Kathy LeBlanc, City Clerk, at [[email protected]] who will swiftly resolve such request.

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ROLL CALL

4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

5. ANNOUNCEMENTS

6. CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION RESULTS

7. OATH OF OFFICE

8. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR

9. APPOINTMENT OF BOARDS AND COMMITTEES

10. 6:30 TIMED ITEM: Musica Sierra Presentation (Attachment)

11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Regular Meeting November 15, 2022 (Attachment)

12. STAFF REPORTS

1. Ethics Training

13. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Please state your name for the record. Comments are limited to three minutes. Written comments should be submitted to the City Clerk 24 hours prior to the meeting to allow for distribution. Under Government Code Section 54954.2 – Brown Act, the Council cannot take action on any item not on the posted agenda

14. FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT

15. FINANCIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS

1. Financial Committee Report/Update
• Approval of Reconciled Accounts for November 2022
(Attachment)
• Approval of Bill Sheet November 2022 (Attachment)
• Acknowledgment of Approval of Fund Transfer from WWTP Settlement (LAIF) to General Fund 1956 not to exceed
$34,887.18 (Attachment)
• Acknowledgment of Approval of Fund Transfer from General 1956 to Enterprise Loan MM 0559 not to exceed $30,000.00 (Attachment)

16. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORTS/PARK AND RECREATION

17. OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS

18. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS

1. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Reaffirming our State of Emergency Water Distribution System.

2. Discussion and Possible Regarding Town Hall Meeting on Water Distribution System.

3. Discussion and Possible Action regarding Interpretation of the Zoning Code Regarding Wireless Tower. (Attachment)

4. Discussion and Possible action regarding review of Conflict of Interest Code (Attachment)

5. Discussion and Possible action regarding adoption of Resolution #8-2022 Adopting and Investment Policy. (Attachment)

6. Discussion and Possible action regarding locking gates at Cemetery.

7. Discussion and Possible action regarding point of contact for alarm system.

19. AGENDA INPUT FOR UPCOMING MEETINGS

20. BOARD MEMBER CLOSING REMARKS

21. ADJOURNMENT
GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
BRIAN DAHLE 78 73.58% 78 73.58%
GAVIN NEWSOM 28 26.42% 28 26.42%
Cast Votes: 106 100.00% 106 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS 71 67.62% 71 67.62%
ELENI KOUNALAKIS 34 32.38% 34 32.38%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SECRETARY OF STATE - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BERNOSKY 72 69.23% 72 69.23%
SHIRLEY N. WEBER 32 30.77% 32 30.77%
Cast Votes: 104 100.00% 104 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CONTROLLER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MALIA M. COHEN 34 32.38% 34 32.38%
LANHEE J. CHEN 71 67.62% 71 67.62%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
TREASURER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
FIONA MA 34 32.38% 34 32.38%
JACK M. GUERRERO 71 67.62% 71 67.62%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BONTA 36 33.96% 36 33.96%
NATHAN HOCHMAN 70 66.04% 70 66.04%
Cast Votes: 106 100.00% 106 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROBERT HOWELL 74 70.48% 74 70.48%
RICARDO LARA 31 29.52% 31 29.52%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JOSE S. ALTAMIRANO 27 25.96% 27 25.96%
TED GAINES 77 74.04% 77 74.04%
Cast Votes: 104 100.00% 104 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Full Term) - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 33 31.13% 33 31.13%
MARK P. MEUSER 73 68.87% 73 68.87%
Cast Votes: 106 100.00% 106 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Partial/Unexpired Term) - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 32 30.48% 32 30.48%
MARK P. MEUSER 73 69.52% 73 69.52%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KERMIT JONES 32 30.48% 32 30.48%
KEVIN KILEY 73 69.52% 73 69.52%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MEGAN DAHLE 74 68.52% 74 68.52%
BELLE STARR SANDWITH 34 31.48% 34 31.48%
Cast Votes: 108 100.00% 108 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Chief Justice Supreme Court, PATRICIA GUERRERO
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 38 42.70% 38 42.70%
NO 51 57.30% 51 57.30%
Cast Votes: 89 100.00% 89 100.00%
Undervotes: 20 20
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 39 44.32% 39 44.32%
NO 49 55.68% 49 55.68%
Cast Votes: 88 100.00% 88 100.00%
Undervotes: 21 21
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, MARTIN J. JENKINS
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 42 49.41% 42 49.41%
NO 43 50.59% 43 50.59%
Cast Votes: 85 100.00% 85 100.00%
Undervotes: 24 24
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Supreme Court, JOSHUA P. GROBAN
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 43 51.19% 43 51.19%
NO 41 48.81% 41 48.81%
Cast Votes: 84 100.00% 84 100.00%
Undervotes: 25 25
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, STACY BOULWARE EURIE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 34 42.50% 34 42.50%
NO 46 57.50% 46 57.50%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 29 29
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, LAURIE EARL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 37 47.44% 37 47.44%
NO 41 52.56% 41 52.56%
Cast Votes: 78 100.00% 78 100.00%
Undervotes: 31 31
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, HARRY HULL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 49 62.82% 49 62.82%
NO 29 37.18% 29 37.18%
Cast Votes: 78 100.00% 78 100.00%
Undervotes: 31 31
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, PETER KRAUSE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 38 48.10% 38 48.10%
NO 41 51.90% 41 51.90%
Cast Votes: 79 100.00% 79 100.00%
Undervotes: 30 30
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 49 55.68% 49 55.68%
TONY K. THURMOND 39 44.32% 39 44.32%
Cast Votes: 88 100.00% 88 100.00%
Undervotes: 19 19
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 2 2
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 2 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ADRIENNE ANILA 15 14.29% 15 14.29%
ANNIE TIPTON 90 85.71% 90 85.71%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 4 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KELLY CHAMPION 72 71.29% 72 71.29%
JESSE WHITLEY 29 28.71% 29 28.71%
Cast Votes: 101 100.00% 101 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 1 1
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL SHORT TERM - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JERRY GEROW 81 100.00% 81 100.00%
Cast Votes: 81 100.00% 81 100.00%
Undervotes: 25 25
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 3 3
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM - Vote for no more than Two
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
NANCY ROGERS 34 21.25% 34 21.25%
SARAH M. JACKSON 67 41.88% 67 41.88%
DORIE L. GAYNER 59 36.88% 59 36.88%
Cast Votes: 160 100.00% 160 100.00%
Undervotes: 53 53
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 3 3
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON CITY CLERK - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
WILLIAM J. MERTTON 48 46.15% 48 46.15%
KATHY LEBLANC 56 53.85% 56 53.85%
Cast Votes: 104 100.00% 104 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 1
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 47 44.34% 47 44.34%
NO 59 55.66% 59 55.66%
Cast Votes: 106 100.00% 106 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 26
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 28 26.17% 28 26.17%
NO 79 73.83% 79 73.83%
Cast Votes: 107 100.00% 107 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 27
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 12.15% 13 12.15%
NO 94 87.85% 94 87.85%
Cast Votes: 107 100.00% 107 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 28
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 61 58.10% 61 58.10%
NO 44 41.90% 44 41.90%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 29
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 27 25.23% 27 25.23%
NO 80 74.77% 80 74.77%
Cast Votes: 107 100.00% 107 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 30
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 33 31.43% 33 31.43%
NO 72 68.57% 72 68.57%
Cast Votes: 105 100.00% 105 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 31
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 45 42.45% 45 42.45%
NO 61 57.55% 61 57.55%
Cast Votes: 106 100.00% 106 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 East 109 of 163 registered voters = 66.87%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
BRIAN DAHLE 53 68.83% 53 68.83%
GAVIN NEWSOM 24 31.17% 24 31.17%
Cast Votes: 77 100.00% 77 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS 47 62.67% 47 62.67%
ELENI KOUNALAKIS 28 37.33% 28 37.33%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SECRETARY OF STATE - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BERNOSKY 47 62.67% 47 62.67%
SHIRLEY N. WEBER 28 37.33% 28 37.33%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CONTROLLER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MALIA M. COHEN 25 33.33% 25 33.33%
LANHEE J. CHEN 50 66.67% 50 66.67%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
TREASURER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
FIONA MA 28 37.84% 28 37.84%
JACK M. GUERRERO 46 62.16% 46 62.16%
Cast Votes: 74 100.00% 74 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BONTA 27 36.00% 27 36.00%
NATHAN HOCHMAN 48 64.00% 48 64.00%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROBERT HOWELL 48 64.00% 48 64.00%
RICARDO LARA 27 36.00% 27 36.00%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JOSE S. ALTAMIRANO 24 32.00% 24 32.00%
TED GAINES 51 68.00% 51 68.00%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Full Term) - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 28 37.33% 28 37.33%
MARK P. MEUSER 47 62.67% 47 62.67%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Partial/Unexpired Term) - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 27 36.00% 27 36.00%
MARK P. MEUSER 48 64.00% 48 64.00%
Cast Votes: 75 100.00% 75 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KERMIT JONES 24 31.58% 24 31.58%
KEVIN KILEY 52 68.42% 52 68.42%
Cast Votes: 76 100.00% 76 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MEGAN DAHLE 53 68.83% 53 68.83%
BELLE STARR SANDWITH 24 31.17% 24 31.17%
Cast Votes: 77 100.00% 77 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Chief Justice Supreme Court, PATRICIA GUERRERO
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 36 59.02% 36 59.02%
NO 25 40.98% 25 40.98%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 30 49.18% 30 49.18%
NO 31 50.82% 31 50.82%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, MARTIN J. JENKINS
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 32 53.33% 32 53.33%
NO 28 46.67% 28 46.67%
Cast Votes: 60 100.00% 60 100.00%
Undervotes: 17 17
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Supreme Court, JOSHUA P. GROBAN
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 30 49.18% 30 49.18%
NO 31 50.82% 31 50.82%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, STACY BOULWARE EURIE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 35 59.32% 35 59.32%
NO 24 40.68% 24 40.68%
Cast Votes: 59 100.00% 59 100.00%
Undervotes: 18 18
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, LAURIE EARL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 33 54.10% 33 54.10%
NO 28 45.90% 28 45.90%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, HARRY HULL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 41 68.33% 41 68.33%
NO 19 31.67% 19 31.67%
Cast Votes: 60 100.00% 60 100.00%
Undervotes: 17 17
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, PETER KRAUSE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 38 63.33% 38 63.33%
NO 22 36.67% 22 36.67%
Cast Votes: 60 100.00% 60 100.00%
Undervotes: 17 17
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 32 50.79% 32 50.79%
TONY K. THURMOND 31 49.21% 31 49.21%
Cast Votes: 63 100.00% 63 100.00%
Undervotes: 11 11
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 2 2
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 2 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ADRIENNE ANILA 19 26.03% 19 26.03%
ANNIE TIPTON 54 73.97% 54 73.97%
Cast Votes: 73 100.00% 73 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 4 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KELLY CHAMPION 51 72.86% 51 72.86%
JESSE WHITLEY 19 27.14% 19 27.14%
Cast Votes: 70 100.00% 70 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 1 1
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL SHORT TERM - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JERRY GEROW 54 100.00% 54 100.00%
Cast Votes: 54 100.00% 54 100.00%
Undervotes: 18 18
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 5 5
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM - Vote for no more than Two
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
NANCY ROGERS 23 19.33% 23 19.33%
SARAH M. JACKSON 47 39.50% 47 39.50%
DORIE L. GAYNER 49 41.18% 49 41.18%
Cast Votes: 119 100.00% 119 100.00%
Undervotes: 33 33
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 2 2
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON CITY CLERK - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
WILLIAM J. MERTTON 39 54.17% 39 54.17%
KATHY LEBLANC 33 45.83% 33 45.83%
Cast Votes: 72 100.00% 72 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 1
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 36 50.70% 36 50.70%
NO 35 49.30% 35 49.30%
Cast Votes: 71 100.00% 71 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 26
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 18.31% 13 18.31%
NO 58 81.69% 58 81.69%
Cast Votes: 71 100.00% 71 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 27
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 11 15.49% 11 15.49%
NO 60 84.51% 60 84.51%
Cast Votes: 71 100.00% 71 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 28
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 46 63.01% 46 63.01%
NO 27 36.99% 27 36.99%
Cast Votes: 73 100.00% 73 100.00%
Undervotes: 4 4
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 29
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 22 31.88% 22 31.88%
NO 47 68.12% 47 68.12%
Cast Votes: 69 100.00% 69 100.00%
Undervotes: 8 8
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 30
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 23 31.94% 23 31.94%
NO 49 68.06% 49 68.06%
Cast Votes: 72 100.00% 72 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 31
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 35 48.61% 35 48.61%
NO 37 51.39% 37 51.39%
Cast Votes: 72 100.00% 72 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 South 77 of 104 registered voters = 74.04%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
BRIAN DAHLE 34 73.91% 34 73.91%
GAVIN NEWSOM 12 26.09% 12 26.09%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS 36 75.00% 36 75.00%
ELENI KOUNALAKIS 12 25.00% 12 25.00%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SECRETARY OF STATE - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BERNOSKY 33 68.75% 33 68.75%
SHIRLEY N. WEBER 15 31.25% 15 31.25%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CONTROLLER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MALIA M. COHEN 15 31.25% 15 31.25%
LANHEE J. CHEN 33 68.75% 33 68.75%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
TREASURER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
FIONA MA 15 31.91% 15 31.91%
JACK M. GUERRERO 32 68.09% 32 68.09%
Cast Votes: 47 100.00% 47 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BONTA 13 27.08% 13 27.08%
NATHAN HOCHMAN 35 72.92% 35 72.92%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROBERT HOWELL 34 70.83% 34 70.83%
RICARDO LARA 14 29.17% 14 29.17%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JOSE S. ALTAMIRANO 13 28.26% 13 28.26%
TED GAINES 33 71.74% 33 71.74%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Full Term) - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 12 25.00% 12 25.00%
MARK P. MEUSER 36 75.00% 36 75.00%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Partial/Unexpired Term) - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 11 23.40% 11 23.40%
MARK P. MEUSER 36 76.60% 36 76.60%
Cast Votes: 47 100.00% 47 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KERMIT JONES 12 25.00% 12 25.00%
KEVIN KILEY 36 75.00% 36 75.00%
Cast Votes: 48 100.00% 48 100.00%
Undervotes: 0 0
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MEGAN DAHLE 34 73.91% 34 73.91%
BELLE STARR SANDWITH 12 26.09% 12 26.09%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Chief Justice Supreme Court, PATRICIA GUERRERO
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 34.21% 13 34.21%
NO 25 65.79% 25 65.79%
Cast Votes: 38 100.00% 38 100.00%
Undervotes: 10 10
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 12 33.33% 12 33.33%
NO 24 66.67% 24 66.67%
Cast Votes: 36 100.00% 36 100.00%
Undervotes: 12 12
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, MARTIN J. JENKINS
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 36.11% 13 36.11%
NO 23 63.89% 23 63.89%
Cast Votes: 36 100.00% 36 100.00%
Undervotes: 12 12
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Supreme Court, JOSHUA P. GROBAN
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 35.14% 13 35.14%
NO 24 64.86% 24 64.86%
Cast Votes: 37 100.00% 37 100.00%
Undervotes: 11 11
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, STACY BOULWARE EURIE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 10 27.03% 10 27.03%
NO 27 72.97% 27 72.97%
Cast Votes: 37 100.00% 37 100.00%
Undervotes: 11 11
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, LAURIE EARL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 36.11% 13 36.11%
NO 23 63.89% 23 63.89%
Cast Votes: 36 100.00% 36 100.00%
Undervotes: 12 12
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, HARRY HULL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 18 48.65% 18 48.65%
NO 19 51.35% 19 51.35%
Cast Votes: 37 100.00% 37 100.00%
Undervotes: 11 11
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, PETER KRAUSE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 13 36.11% 13 36.11%
NO 23 63.89% 23 63.89%
Cast Votes: 36 100.00% 36 100.00%
Undervotes: 12 12
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 23 54.76% 23 54.76%
TONY K. THURMOND 19 45.24% 19 45.24%
Cast Votes: 42 100.00% 42 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 1 1
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 2 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ADRIENNE ANILA 8 17.78% 8 17.78%
ANNIE TIPTON 37 82.22% 37 82.22%
Cast Votes: 45 100.00% 45 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 4 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KELLY CHAMPION 34 80.95% 34 80.95%
JESSE WHITLEY 8 19.05% 8 19.05%
Cast Votes: 42 100.00% 42 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL SHORT TERM - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JERRY GEROW 28 100.00% 28 100.00%
Cast Votes: 28 100.00% 28 100.00%
Undervotes: 18 18
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 2 2
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM - Vote for no more than Two
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
NANCY ROGERS 10 16.13% 10 16.13%
SARAH M. JACKSON 29 46.77% 29 46.77%
DORIE L. GAYNER 23 37.10% 23 37.10%
Cast Votes: 62 100.00% 62 100.00%
Undervotes: 33 33
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 1 1
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON CITY CLERK - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
WILLIAM J. MERTTON 19 41.30% 19 41.30%
KATHY LEBLANC 27 58.70% 27 58.70%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 1
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 19 41.30% 19 41.30%
NO 27 58.70% 27 58.70%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 26
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 4 8.89% 4 8.89%
NO 41 91.11% 41 91.11%
Cast Votes: 45 100.00% 45 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 27
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 4 8.70% 4 8.70%
NO 42 91.30% 42 91.30%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 28
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 18 40.00% 18 40.00%
NO 27 60.00% 27 60.00%
Cast Votes: 45 100.00% 45 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 29
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 5 11.11% 5 11.11%
NO 40 88.89% 40 88.89%
Cast Votes: 45 100.00% 45 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 30
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 7 15.22% 7 15.22%
NO 39 84.78% 39 84.78%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 31
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 19 41.30% 19 41.30%
NO 27 58.70% 27 58.70%
Cast Votes: 46 100.00% 46 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 4 West 48 of 79 registered voters = 60.76%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
BRIAN DAHLE 58 72.50% 58 72.50%
GAVIN NEWSOM 22 27.50% 22 27.50%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS 54 67.50% 54 67.50%
ELENI KOUNALAKIS 26 32.50% 26 32.50%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SECRETARY OF STATE - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BERNOSKY 54 67.50% 54 67.50%
SHIRLEY N. WEBER 26 32.50% 26 32.50%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CONTROLLER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MALIA M. COHEN 24 30.00% 24 30.00%
LANHEE J. CHEN 56 70.00% 56 70.00%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
TREASURER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
FIONA MA 25 32.47% 25 32.47%
JACK M. GUERRERO 52 67.53% 52 67.53%
Cast Votes: 77 100.00% 77 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BONTA 26 32.91% 26 32.91%
NATHAN HOCHMAN 53 67.09% 53 67.09%
Cast Votes: 79 100.00% 79 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROBERT HOWELL 53 67.09% 53 67.09%
RICARDO LARA 26 32.91% 26 32.91%
Cast Votes: 79 100.00% 79 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JOSE S. ALTAMIRANO 23 29.11% 23 29.11%
TED GAINES 56 70.89% 56 70.89%
Cast Votes: 79 100.00% 79 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Full Term) - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 25 31.25% 25 31.25%
MARK P. MEUSER 55 68.75% 55 68.75%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Partial/Unexpired Term) - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 25 31.65% 25 31.65%
MARK P. MEUSER 54 68.35% 54 68.35%
Cast Votes: 79 100.00% 79 100.00%
Undervotes: 3 3
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KERMIT JONES 25 31.25% 25 31.25%
KEVIN KILEY 55 68.75% 55 68.75%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MEGAN DAHLE 56 70.00% 56 70.00%
BELLE STARR SANDWITH 24 30.00% 24 30.00%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Chief Justice Supreme Court, PATRICIA GUERRERO
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 37 53.62% 37 53.62%
NO 32 46.38% 32 46.38%
Cast Votes: 69 100.00% 69 100.00%
Undervotes: 13 13
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 34 51.52% 34 51.52%
NO 32 48.48% 32 48.48%
Cast Votes: 66 100.00% 66 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, MARTIN J. JENKINS
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 36 54.55% 36 54.55%
NO 30 45.45% 30 45.45%
Cast Votes: 66 100.00% 66 100.00%
Undervotes: 16 16
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Supreme Court, JOSHUA P. GROBAN
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 36 56.25% 36 56.25%
NO 28 43.75% 28 43.75%
Cast Votes: 64 100.00% 64 100.00%
Undervotes: 18 18
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, STACY BOULWARE EURIE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 31 50.82% 31 50.82%
NO 30 49.18% 30 49.18%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 21 21
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, LAURIE EARL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 31 51.67% 31 51.67%
NO 29 48.33% 29 48.33%
Cast Votes: 60 100.00% 60 100.00%
Undervotes: 22 22
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, HARRY HULL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 44 73.33% 44 73.33%
NO 16 26.67% 16 26.67%
Cast Votes: 60 100.00% 60 100.00%
Undervotes: 22 22
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, PETER KRAUSE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 30 50.85% 30 50.85%
NO 29 49.15% 29 49.15%
Cast Votes: 59 100.00% 59 100.00%
Undervotes: 23 23
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 37 53.62% 37 53.62%
TONY K. THURMOND 32 46.38% 32 46.38%
Cast Votes: 69 100.00% 69 100.00%
Undervotes: 13 13
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 2 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ADRIENNE ANILA 18 23.38% 18 23.38%
ANNIE TIPTON 59 76.62% 59 76.62%
Cast Votes: 77 100.00% 77 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 4 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KELLY CHAMPION 52 73.24% 52 73.24%
JESSE WHITLEY 19 26.76% 19 26.76%
Cast Votes: 71 100.00% 71 100.00%
Undervotes: 11 11
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL SHORT TERM - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JERRY GEROW 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Cast Votes: 61 100.00% 61 100.00%
Undervotes: 18 18
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 3 3
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM - Vote for no more than Two
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
NANCY ROGERS 31 28.70% 31 28.70%
SARAH M. JACKSON 35 32.41% 35 32.41%
DORIE L. GAYNER 42 38.89% 42 38.89%
Cast Votes: 108 100.00% 108 100.00%
Undervotes: 53 53
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 3 3
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON CITY CLERK - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
WILLIAM J. MERTTON 30 38.96% 30 38.96%
KATHY LEBLANC 47 61.04% 47 61.04%
Cast Votes: 77 100.00% 77 100.00%
Undervotes: 5 5
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 1
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 42 51.85% 42 51.85%
NO 39 48.15% 39 48.15%
Cast Votes: 81 100.00% 81 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 26
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 20 25.00% 20 25.00%
NO 60 75.00% 60 75.00%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 27
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 4 5.00% 4 5.00%
NO 76 95.00% 76 95.00%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 28
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 42 55.26% 42 55.26%
NO 34 44.74% 34 44.74%
Cast Votes: 76 100.00% 76 100.00%
Undervotes: 6 6
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
PROPOSITION 29
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 21 25.93% 21 25.93%
NO 60 74.07% 60 74.07%
Cast Votes: 81 100.00% 81 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 30
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 19 23.75% 19 23.75%
NO 61 76.25% 61 76.25%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 2 2
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 31
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 37 46.25% 37 46.25%
NO 43 53.75% 43 53.75%
Cast Votes: 80 100.00% 80 100.00%
Undervotes: 1 1
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Loyalton 5 West 82 of 117 registered voters = 70.09%
Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

November 2022 Precinct
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
2:06 PM
12/06/2022
GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
BRIAN DAHLE 1,014 65.72% 1,014 65.72%
GAVIN NEWSOM 529 34.28% 529 34.28%
Cast Votes: 1,543 100.00% 1,543 100.00%
Undervotes: 41 41
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS 975 63.23% 975 63.23%
ELENI KOUNALAKIS 567 36.77% 567 36.77%
Cast Votes: 1,542 100.00% 1,542 100.00%
Undervotes: 43 43
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SECRETARY OF STATE - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BERNOSKY 971 63.01% 971 63.01%
SHIRLEY N. WEBER 570 36.99% 570 36.99%
Cast Votes: 1,541 100.00% 1,541 100.00%
Undervotes: 44 44
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
CONTROLLER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MALIA M. COHEN 527 34.31% 527 34.31%
LANHEE J. CHEN 1,009 65.69% 1,009 65.69%
Cast Votes: 1,536 100.00% 1,536 100.00%
Undervotes: 49 49
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
TREASURER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
FIONA MA 568 37.10% 568 37.10%
JACK M. GUERRERO 963 62.90% 963 62.90%
Cast Votes: 1,531 100.00% 1,531 100.00%
Undervotes: 54 54
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROB BONTA 564 36.50% 564 36.50%
NATHAN HOCHMAN 981 63.50% 981 63.50%
Cast Votes: 1,545 100.00% 1,545 100.00%
Undervotes: 40 40
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ROBERT HOWELL 971 63.46% 971 63.46%
RICARDO LARA 559 36.54% 559 36.54%
Cast Votes: 1,530 100.00% 1,530 100.00%
Undervotes: 55 55
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JOSE S. ALTAMIRANO 504 32.96% 504 32.96%
TED GAINES 1,025 67.04% 1,025 67.04%
Cast Votes: 1,529 100.00% 1,529 100.00%
Undervotes: 56 56
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Full Term) - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 572 37.02% 572 37.02%
MARK P. MEUSER 973 62.98% 973 62.98%
Cast Votes: 1,545 100.00% 1,545 100.00%
Undervotes: 40 40
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
UNITED STATES SENATOR (Partial/Unexpired Term) - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ALEX PADILLA 569 37.02% 569 37.02%
MARK P. MEUSER 968 62.98% 968 62.98%
Cast Votes: 1,537 100.00% 1,537 100.00%
Undervotes: 48 48
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KERMIT JONES 582 37.48% 582 37.48%
KEVIN KILEY 971 62.52% 971 62.52%
Cast Votes: 1,553 100.00% 1,553 100.00%
Undervotes: 32 32
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
STATE ASSEMBLY MEMBER DISTRICT 1 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
MEGAN DAHLE 1,009 65.22% 1,009 65.22%
BELLE STARR SANDWITH 538 34.78% 538 34.78%
Cast Votes: 1,547 100.00% 1,547 100.00%
Undervotes: 38 38
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
Chief Justice Supreme Court, PATRICIA GUERRERO
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 641 50.51% 641 50.51%
NO 628 49.49% 628 49.49%
Cast Votes: 1,269 100.00% 1,269 100.00%
Undervotes: 316 316
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, GOODWIN LIU
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 617 50.37% 617 50.37%
NO 608 49.63% 608 49.63%
Cast Votes: 1,225 100.00% 1,225 100.00%
Undervotes: 359 359
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Supreme Court, MARTIN J. JENKINS
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 607 50.08% 607 50.08%
NO 605 49.92% 605 49.92%
Cast Votes: 1,212 100.00% 1,212 100.00%
Undervotes: 373 373
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
Associate Justice Supreme Court, JOSHUA P. GROBAN
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 624 51.83% 624 51.83%
NO 580 48.17% 580 48.17%
Cast Votes: 1,204 100.00% 1,204 100.00%
Undervotes: 381 381
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, STACY BOULWARE EURIE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 602 51.32% 602 51.32%
NO 571 48.68% 571 48.68%
Cast Votes: 1,173 100.00% 1,173 100.00%
Undervotes: 412 412
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, LAURIE EARL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 588 50.65% 588 50.65%
NO 573 49.35% 573 49.35%
Cast Votes: 1,161 100.00% 1,161 100.00%
Undervotes: 424 424
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, HARRY HULL Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 720 62.18% 720 62.18%
NO 438 37.82% 438 37.82%
Cast Votes: 1,158 100.00% 1,158 100.00%
Undervotes: 427 427
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
Associate Justice Court of Appeal, 3rd District, PETER KRAUSE Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 594 51.34% 594 51.34%
NO 563 48.66% 563 48.66%
Cast Votes: 1,157 100.00% 1,157 100.00%
Undervotes: 428 428
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN 659 50.65% 659 50.65%
TONY K. THURMOND 642 49.35% 642 49.35%
Cast Votes: 1,301 100.00% 1,301 100.00%
Undervotes: 257 257
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 26 26
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 2 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
ADRIENNE ANILA 357 25.61% 357 25.61%
ANNIE TIPTON 1,037 74.39% 1,037 74.39%
Cast Votes: 1,394 100.00% 1,394 100.00%
Undervotes: 177 177
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 13 13
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
SIERRA-PLUMAS JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRUSTEE AREA 4 - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
KELLY CHAMPION 904 70.40% 904 70.40%
JESSE WHITLEY 380 29.60% 380 29.60%
Cast Votes: 1,284 100.00% 1,284 100.00%
Undervotes: 280 280
Overvotes: 2 2
Rejected write-in votes: 19 19
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL SHORT TERM - Vote for One Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
JERRY GEROW 224 100.00% 224 100.00%
Cast Votes: 224 100.00% 224 100.00%
Undervotes: 79 79
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 13 13
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
CITY OF LOYALTON MEMBER, CITY COUNCIL FULL TERM - Vote for no more than Two
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
NANCY ROGERS 98 21.83% 98 21.83%
SARAH M. JACKSON 178 39.64% 178 39.64%
DORIE L. GAYNER 173 38.53% 173 38.53%
Cast Votes: 449 100.00% 449 100.00%
Undervotes: 172 172
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 9 9
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
CITY OF LOYALTON CITY CLERK - Vote for One
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
WILLIAM J. MERTTON 136 45.48% 136 45.48%
KATHY LEBLANC 163 54.52% 163 54.52%
Cast Votes: 299 100.00% 299 100.00%
Undervotes: 17 17
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 1
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 787 51.24% 787 51.24%
NO 749 48.76% 749 48.76%
Cast Votes: 1,536 100.00% 1,536 100.00%
Undervotes: 49 49
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
PROPOSITION 26
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 340 22.65% 340 22.65%
NO 1,161 77.35% 1,161 77.35%
Cast Votes: 1,501 100.00% 1,501 100.00%
Undervotes: 84 84
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 27
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 174 11.42% 174 11.42%
NO 1,349 88.58% 1,349 88.58%
Cast Votes: 1,523 100.00% 1,523 100.00%
Undervotes: 62 62
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 28
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 846 55.33% 846 55.33%
NO 683 44.67% 683 44.67%
Cast Votes: 1,529 100.00% 1,529 100.00%
Undervotes: 56 56
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
PROPOSITION 29
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 377 25.13% 377 25.13%
NO 1,123 74.87% 1,123 74.87%
Cast Votes: 1,500 100.00% 1,500 100.00%
Undervotes: 85 85
Overvotes: 0 0
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 30
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 478 31.24% 478 31.24%
NO 1,052 68.76% 1,052 68.76%
Cast Votes: 1,530 100.00% 1,530 100.00%
Undervotes: 53 53
Overvotes: 2 2
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
PROPOSITION 31
Choice Party Vote-By-Mail Total
YES 822 54.44% 822 54.44%
NO 688 45.56% 688 45.56%
Cast Votes: 1,510 100.00% 1,510 100.00%
Undervotes: 74 74
Overvotes: 1 1
Rejected write-in votes: 0 0
Unresolved write-in votes: 0 0
*** End of report ***
November 2022 Cumulative
Results
Official
Run Time
Run Date
9:45 AM
12/07/2022

COUNTY OF SIERRA, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL ELECTION
11/8/2022

Official Results
Registered Voters
1585 of 2220 = 71.40%
Precincts Reporting
19 of 19 = 100.00%
The City of Loyalton December 20th, 2022 Meeting
Musica Sierra
Our mission is to enrich the cultural experience of Sierra County with world-class, year-round performances and music education, accessible and affordable for all.

Statement of intent
Musica Sierra is asking the City of Loyalton to sponsor the use of the facility known as the “Schoolhouse” next to the social hall.

Purpose
● Musica Sierra Student Musicians - Loyalton K-12 rehearsals, workshops, and performances
● Musica Sierra Programs and Performances - Musical Headwater, Evening Song, Mini Music Makers
● Music Venue
● Recording Studio
● Community Venue for weddings, birthday parties, graduation parties, school dances, conferences, large staff meetings, staff retreats, etc.

Development
● Restore and Renovate the building to its historical character from 1865 to reflect the history and natural beauty of the region.
● Develop and maintain the property grounds - potential benches, awnings, play structures for K-12, local plants, and annual flower garden in collaboration with the Learning Garden at Loyalton Elementary School.
● The building must be financially sustainable.
● Cultivate community engagement in this part of town.

Benefit
● Increases awareness and support for Musica Sierra’s education initiative in the Loyalton Schools.
● Strengthen the local community
● Increase tourism through arts, culture, and local history ● Generate revenue for the city and local businesses
Musica Sierra Facilities Use for the Schoolhouse 12.12.2022 | Lindsay McIntosh 209.202.9238 Details of contract
● The City of Loyalton agrees on a thirty-year lease for $1 a year, resulting in a lease fee of $30.
● If the City of Loyalton agrees on the lease, Music Sierra is willing to a hold-harmless agreement, thus assuming all the liability of the property and the building. ● Musica Sierra has the first right of refusal to purchase said building if the City of Loyalton, for any such reason, does not acquire the lease. ● The City of Loyalton agrees to provide a will-serve letter to access electricity, sewer, and water in the schoolhouse building.
● Musica Sierra agrees to be financially responsible for all renovations and work needed on the church building to make it habitable for the public. ● Musica Sierra agrees to be financially responsible for all the permitting and city work that might be required.
● The City of Loyalton agrees to allow access to the bathroom, social hall, and kitchen during Musica Sierra events until renovations are completed. ● Musica Sierra agrees to pay all monthly utilities and be responsible for maintaining the building and grounds around it.

Upgrades needed but not limited to:
● Electrical
● Heating
● Addition of one ADA bathroom
● Stage - rectangular 15” height? * could we use all that old wood from the broken-down structures on the grounds?
● With a step across the front
● Stage lighting mounted on the walls but done without drawing attention ● Keep the current chandelier lighting
● Stained Glass mural on the west window with an additional window pane on the exterior. ● Modernized double-paned window on the east side
● Insulate the building as necessary
● Paint the interior and exterior
● Possible lead paint removal/ sealing.

Possible uses for the space but not limited to
● Theater productions
● Musical productions
● Chamber concerts
● Choir rehearsals
● Mini music makers
● School dances
● Art exhibitions
● Unique artist exhibitions
Musica Sierra Facilities Use for the Schoolhouse 12.12.2022 | Lindsay McIntosh 209.202.9238 ● Mercantile projects
● Other artist's workshops
Timeline:

December 20th: City Council Meeting to approve use and upgrade of the space December 26: Work with the Museum Board, Musica Sierra Board, and community members to clean up the inside and evaluate what can stay
December 30th: Hold a yard sale as a fundraiser for the capital improvements In the new year of 2023:

Begin fundraising efforts on a monumental scale
● This includes various charitable foundations, some public, and a local capital fundraising campaign.
● Draw up plans
● Apply for a building permit through the City of Loyalton ● Finalize our contractor
● Begin work on the space
Notes:

Musica Sierra Facilities Use for the Schoolhouse 12.12.2022 | Lindsay McIntosh 209.202.9238

A B O U T M U S I C A S I E R R A
"...is r e imagining California cowboy count ry as a sanc tuary for cultural innovation."
-Sean McAlindin, Tahoe We ekly
Lindsay McIntosh, founder and executive director of Musica Sierra is a proud resident of Sierra County. Truckee Ca native, historical oboist, arts entrepreneur and new music devotee has created and executed a muchneeded array of programs that benefit and enrich our community and students in our public school. Our programs include a community spotlight series, weekly music enrichment classes in the public school serving each grade level, community music classes, ages 0-5 music engagement, Musical Headwaters, and exposure in the schools. Since our launch in 2020, we’ve worked closely with our state-local partners, The Sierra Valley Arts Council (SVAC), Sierra Plumas Joint Unified, First 5 Sierra and The Sierra Schools Foundation who provide us with funding to create and execute our top caliber arts and music educational programming, as well as bringing out world-class musicians to perform
Lindsay is a graduate of the esteemed Juilliard School of Music, McIntosh was on a full scholarship in the Historical Performance program and has appeared under world-renowned conductors such as William Christi, Masaaki Suzuki, Jordi Savall, Richard Egarr and Monica Huggett. In 2013, while in her second year of graduate studies at the Juilliard School, McIntosh discovered her passion for leadership and creative programming. As a result, McIntosh founded New Vintage Baroque –an adventurous ensemble dedicated to promote the public good by creating musical programs, commissions and music education programs through different and unique styles that are accessible for all.

A not e
“Lindsay McIntosh and Musica Sierra have been very creative in their delivery of music instruction during this pandemic. I am extremely happy to have the opportunity to work with such dedicated people and organizations.”
- James Berardi, Superintendent. Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District 2 COMMISSION
two new works as part of our
Musical Headwaters program
800
KIDS
over 800 kids exposed to world
class musical performances in
Sierra-Plumas County
29 INTERACTIVE

PERFORMANCES
created and performed for preschool-12th
grade in Sierra & Plumas Joint Unified
Schools
8 MUSIC PROGRAMS

OFFERED
currently we have desk-bells, violin, bucket
drumming, drum core, guitar, ukulele, dance
class and 0-5 music enrichment in the schools.
1 ALBUM
"The Rivers are out Brothers" by
Majel Connery written for the
kiddos of Sierra & Plumas Joint
Unified Schools

LINDSAY MCINTOSH

FOUNDER
&

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Our mission is to enrich
the cultural experience
of Sierra County with
world-class, year-round
performances and music
education, accessible
and affordable for all.

MUSIC

EDUCATION
With the support of the Sierra County Arts Council’s Artist In Schools Grant, and matching grants from Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified and The Sierra School’s Foundation, Musica Sierra has hired two music teachers to teach a weekly, sometimes twice a week, music appreciation class for grades Pre-K-12th at both schools site; Downieville and Loyalton.

Musical learning and exposure to the arts are essential experiences for healthy human development. We believe such experiences should be available to all youth in Sierra County regardless of their background Musica Sierra’s primary goal will be to facilitate the expansion of music education opportunities in the Sierra Valley with a regular, sustainable presence in local schools and learning centers.

Prodigies Music Desk Bells
Program TK-3rd
Suzuki Strings Program 4th-5th
Drum elective 6th
Dance & Movement Class 2/3rd
grage
Guitar elective
Drum Core
Ukulele
Loyalton Elementary
Loyalton High School

DOWNIEVILLE SCHOOLS LOYALTON SCHOOLS
Prodigies Music Desk Bells
Program TK-3rd
Ukulele & Recorder elective 4-6th
Rock Bank 360
Ukulele
Music Appreciation
Songwriting and recording Studio
Downieville Elementary
Downieville High School

MUSIC IN

SCHOOLS
These incredible musicians spent a week
performing for the students of SierraPlumas Joint Unified. From Loyalton to Quincy, the student and staff had the rare
opportunity to experience Flamenco
dancing, performed by one of the worlds
leading dancers. Performers were Fire &
Grace is an eclectic collaboration between
guitarist William Coulter and violinist Edwin
Huizinga and Fanny Ara an internationallysought after and award-winning choreographer, performer and instructor.

An IP is an Interactive Performance that the musicians will create specifically for each Artists-In-Residence project. Modeled from Carnegie Halls’ Ensemble Connect, we will use these interactive performances to engage with audiences by “exploring and discovering a piece of music or musical concept”.

Musical learning and exposure to the arts are essential experiences for healthy human development. We believe such experiences should be available to all youth in Sierra County regardless of their background This program brings world-class musicians to the Sierra Valley year-round to perform, expose and educate through Interactive performances..

Critically acclaimed pianist Carolyn Enger’s
Resonating Earth is a multimedia solo piano
performance that creates a meditative space
for listeners to engage with music and
environmental art, in order to directly inspire
environmental action afterwards. The
performance would include a live premiere of
newly commissioned work from J Henry Fair,
supported by the Puffin Foundation.

Carolyn spent a week here in the Sierra's
performing four IP's for our schools.

SPIRIT OF SPAIN

RESONATING EARTH
Our IP sessions will target the schools and districts where we can have the biggest, lasting impact. Lindsay McIntosh, Director of New Vintage Baroque, works closely with each school site to personally curate an experience that will inspire and uplift the students attending. 2021

MUSICAL

HEADWATERS
Musical Headwaters is a Musica Sierra initiative that
commissions new works of music inspired by the Sierra
Valley in order to bridge nature based education with the visual and performing arts and deepen children's social and emotional connection to the earth.

Artist Residency
Composers and musicians spend one week at the historic
Lemon Canyon Ranch nestled in the headwaters of the
Middle Fork of the Feather River to compose and perform original works which reflect the surrounding beauty of the Sierras.

Visual and Performing Arts (VAPA)
Musical Headwaters’ original compositions are freely
available to parents, students, and educational institutions to enhance all Nature-Based or natural science curriculum through the inclusion of the Visual and Performing Arts and Project Based Learning.

Member Institutions
Sierra County Arts Council
Feather River Land Trust
Learning Landscape
Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified School District (SPJUSD)
Plumas Unified School District (PUSD)
Plumas Arts
Our first residency featured the watershed. It
premiered June 2022 called "The Rivers are
Our Brothers", written and performed by
vocalist and composer Majel Connery, along
with violin (Edwin Huizinga) and bassoon (Ben
Matus). The cycle is based on a quote from
the Native American leader, Chief Seattle,
who believed we must relate to our
environment the way we relate to our closest
kin. Each song begins “I am a river,” or “I am
rain,” giving the power of first-person speech
to these important elements of the Sierra
Nevada landscape.

We spent four days performing fourteen
interactive performances for grade levels
spanning preschool through 12th grade.

From Loyalton to Downieville we reached
over 400 kids district-wide, and even had the
kids compose their own musical thunderstorm
with various instruments and then performed
along with the musicians!
Listen to our demos for "The Rivers are Our Brothers" here! Watch our musical thunderstorm here!
MUSICASIERRA.ORG
LINDSAY MCINTOSH | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Musica Sierra tackles its second year of Musical Headwaters, featuring a new song cycle co-written by Edwin Huizinga, and Jonathan Woody called “I am a Trout”. This incredible program features Fire & Grace & Ash, with vocalist Kara Dugan. Fire & Grace & Ash is a dynamic trio made up of ace mandolin player and composer Ashley Broder, acclaimed violinist Edwin Huizinga and Grammy award-winning guitarist William Coulter.

The program will premiere a new song cycle inspired by the native trout found in the Sierra. This composition will explore the musical feel of folk Americana, particularly that of Northern California. The rest of the program will feature a blending of Bach and American fiddle tunes from the trio’s recent album Partita Americana.

MUSICAL

HEADWATERS
MUSICASIERRA.ORG
LINDSAY MCINTOSH | EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
"I AM A TROUT"
Musical Headwaters is a Musica Sierra initiative that
commissions new works of music inspired by the Sierra
Valley in order to bridge nature based education with the visual and performing arts and deepen children's social and emotional connection to the earth.

Fire & Grace & Ash
with vocalist Kara Dugan
TROUT "NIBBLER"

ENGAGEMENTS

CLICK HERE FOR INFO

AND VIDEOS
JUNE 6-13, 2022

COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT SERIES
These BIPOC (black, indigenous, people of color) artists were brought together to help create a series of performances and presentations that explore the unique perspective of artists of color.

This series features artists from our local and neighboring counties and will highlight the diversity and creativity that lies within our very own backyard. We aim to feature artists from all walks of life that have incorporated music-making into their daily lives, home, and families.

Michael Muyanja - A local member of our community originally from Uganda presented a concert featuring traditional African drums. Watch his video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8g_WEm1gZU&t=1130s Brandon Greathouse - A dancer from Sacramento, he brought his dance troupe to our region to present a dance performance that featured dancers from ages 4-20.

Watch his video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKR3WnRGLRU The Red Hoop Singers - Part of the Washoe tribe, the indigenous tribe to our region. They performed a concert of traditional music and dance to highlight the importance of the indigenous community and the preservation of their cultural traditions.

Watch a video here of live in person performance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruhmENrjLco

THE DIGITAL

STAGE SERIES
The Digital Stage Series is a monthly video series that brings world-class artists to the digital stage of Sierra Plumas County Joint Unified. During this unprecedented
time, the traditional assembly or field trip to the symphony isn’t an option for us, to ensure that we continually expose and inspire our children during this time we're feature thirty of the most incredibly talented musicians that are leading artists in their field. This video will launch the last week of each month for them to watch in class, or at their leisure.

The funding for this new initiative is supported by the California Arts Council Exposure grant and matched by
Sierra Schools Foundation and Sierra-Plumas Joint Unified.

This program is made possible by the Sierra County Arts Council’s Exposure Grant.

Over 17 artists were featured and shown district wide
throughout the 2020/2021 school year!
Highlights of the artist featured include:

Davóne Tines “named one of Time magazine's
Next Generation Leaders”, bass-baritone
Doug Balliett “New York City-based Doug
Balliett is a composer, instrumentalist, and
poet with a constant stream of commissions, a
weekly show on New York Public Radio, and
nearly 200 performances per year.”
John Brancy “Grammy Award Winning Singer
John Brancy is an internationally renowned
Operatic Baritone”
Peter Dugan “ Pianist Peter Dugan's debut
solo performances with Michael Tilson
Thomas and the San Francisco Symphony
were described by the Los Angeles Times as
“stunning” and by the SF Chronicle as
“fearlessly athletic.” He is heard nationwide as
the newly announced host of NPR’s beloved
program From the Top.

November 15, 2022

REGULAR MEETING
The Regular meeting of the Loyalton City Council was called to order by Mayor S. Jackson on November 15, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. Loyalton City Auditorium COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT Mayor S. Jackson, D. Riede, J. Markum, J. Gerow

COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT

STAFF PRESENT
City Clerk- Kathy LeBlanc

GUESTS PRESENT
D. Laylor, D. Gayner, B. Mertton, L. Horner, D. Azevedo, S. Azevedo. C. Johnson

APPROVAL OF AGENDA
It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by J. Gerow to approve the agenda as amended. Motion carried.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

1. Mayor Jackson addressed the letter from the State of California in regards to utility shut offs for nonpayment.

2. Mayor Jackon addressed the Council on making our Web Site ADA Compliant, it was decided by consensus of the Council for G. Morris to move forward. 3 Mayor Jackson addressed the issue on Cyber Security for the City of Loyalton. The Council will address this at a later date if need arises.
.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. It was moved by D. Riede, seconded by J. Gerow to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022. Motion carried.

2. It was moved by D. Riede, seconded by J. Gerow to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of October 25, 2022. Motion carried.

STAFF REPORTS/WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS

1. Mayor Jackson reported that the Verizon Tower is going forward. Councilmember Markum will meet with Verizon on Monday.

PUBLIC COMMENT
None
.

FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT
None
Mayor Jackson reported that the Annual Christmas Tree Lighting and the Light Parade will take place on December 3, 2022

FINANCIAL COMMITTEE REPORT/UPDATE
Mayor Jackson reported on the Finance Meeting met to discuss the current bills, Fire Department Reserve Account, Admin Fees for Wild Land Fire and High Fuel Cost.

1. It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by J. Markum to approve reconciled accounts for October 2022. Motion carried.

2. It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by D. Riede to approve the bill sheet for October 2022 not to exceed $76,923.10. Motion carried.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF APPROVAL OF FUNDS TRANSFERS.

1. It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by D. Riede to approve the fund transfer from General 1956 to Enterprise MM 0559 not to exceed $24,000. Motion carried.

2. It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by J. Gerow to transfer $302,453.20 from Cal-Trust Savings and Enterprise loan account to General Accont for Farr West Engineering. Motion carried.

3. It was moved by D. Riede, seconded by J. Gerow to transfer $2,995.20 from FEMA Account to Gerneral for Willow Street Project. Motion carried.

4. After a discussion on a payment plan, It was moved by J. Markum, seconded by D. Riede to transfer $12, 099.80 from General to Fire Department Reserve Account. Motion carried. It was then moved by D.

Riede seconded by J. Markum to transfer $27,477.71 from General to Fire Department Reserve Account.

Motion carried.

PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORTS/PARK AND RECREATION

1. Mayor Jackson addressed the issue of water meter at the Gilded Drifter, we will begin reading meter as soon as we can.

2. Councilmember Riede informed the council that the Park and Main Street have been winterized.

3. Councilmember Gerow reported that burning is taking place at the WWTP.

4. Mayor Jackson addressed the hook up for the Azevedo Property stating we will begin the project as soon as we possibly can.

5. Mayor Jackson gave a brief update on the Main Water Break and Van Daam/ Belli project.

OTHER COMMITTEE REPORTS

1. Mayor Jackson reported that CTL will continue to plow City Streets. The City crew will be responsible for City Hall, Social Hall and Fire Department.
.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ITEMS

1. Mayor Jackson gave a brief update on the water distribution system, after a brief discussion It was moved by D. Riede, seconded by J. Gerow to reaffirm our State of Emergency Water Distribution System. Motion carried. (This item will be added to next agenda)

2. Mayor Jackson reported on the Town Hall Meeting stating it was well attended by the community.

She informed the Council and the Public that an ad hock committee was formed and will meet as needed. Mayor Jackson urged community to attend and participate. The next meeting is set for December 1, 2022. Mayor Jackson will continue to give updates. (This item will be added to the next agenda)

3. After a brief discussion it was decided to decline offer for It Tech. The Council will address this item at a later date.

4. After a discussion it was decided by consensus to have J. Morris identify property’s that are in violation and return to City Clerk to follow up with letters.

5. After a discussion it was moved by D. Riede, seconded by J. Markum to approve (6) $100.00 gift certificates for Employee’s for the Holiday’s. Motion carried .

IMPUT FOR UPCOMING MEETINGS

1. Reaffirm our State of Emergency Water Distribution System

2. Update on Town Hall Meeting

3. Oath of Offices

4. Appointment of Mayor and Vice Mayor

5. Appointment of Committee’s.

6. Appointment of contact’s for Alarm System.

CLOSING REMARKS
None
Meeting Adjourned
APPROVED: _____________________________
Mayor Sarah Jackson
ATTEST: ______________________________
Kathy LeBlanc, City Clerk
Dec 14, 22
ASSETS
Current Assets
Checking/Savings
PayPal - Credit Card Payments 294.96
Enterprise Loan MM 0559 103,435.19
General Funds
General Checking 1956- NEW 98,602.40
Total General Funds 98,602.40
Designated Funds
WWTP Settlement (LAIF) 2,045,633.85
WWTP Settlement MM 4387 (New) 178,091.75
Fire Dept. Reserve 7243 128,874.45
FEMA Flood Savings 0059 52,482.88
Total Designated Funds 2,405,082.93
Cash Drawer 400.00
Total Checking/Savings 2,607,815.48
Accounts Receivable 6,736.88
Other Current Assets
Prepaid Expense 33,768.00
Unrealized Gain/Loss -398.62
Grants Receivable 20,309.90
Due From Other Funds 842,677.83
Accounts Receivable- Proprietar 68,426.95
Undeposited Funds 144.00
Total Other Current Assets 964,928.06
Total Current Assets 3,579,480.42
Fixed Assets 9,162,777.24
TOTAL ASSETS 12,742,257.66

LIABILITIES & EQUITY
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable 73,164.78
Credit Cards 1,932.52
Other Current Liabilities
Unearned Revenue - Proprietar 6,856.43
Unearned Revenue-FEMA Advance 52,469.37
Due to Other Funds 842,677.83
Accrued Bond Interest Payable 57,588.75
Accrued Payroll -11,170.77
Accrued Expenses 18,595.82
Payroll Liabilities 509.13
Total Other Current Liabilities 967,526.56
Total Current Liabilities 1,042,623.86
Long Term Liabilities 4,591,830.93
Total Liabilities 5,634,454.79
Equity 7,107,802.87
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 12,742,257.66
1:50 PM City of Loyalton
12/15/22 Balance Sheet
Accrual Basis As of December 14, 2022

2:13 PM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
General
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
Jul 1 - Dec 12, 22 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget
Revenues
Donations 32.75 0.00 32.75 100.0%
Property Taxes 0.00 45,000.00 -45,000.00 0.0%
License & Fee Revenues
ADA Fee 168.00
Sales & Use 24,836.52
Business License 5,440.00
Total License & Fee Revenues 30,444.52 80,000.00 -49,555.48 38.06% LEAP Grant Revenue 20,309.90 1,459.27 18,850.63 1,391.79% Charges for Current Services
Building Permits 1,496.00 4,500.00 -3,004.00 33.24%
Copies & Faxes 196.30 500.00 -303.70 39.26%
Cemetery 0.00 250.00 -250.00 0.0%
Rent Income 6,465.00 15,000.00 -8,535.00 43.1%
Total Charges for Current Services 8,157.30 20,250.00 -12,092.70 40.28% Interest Income 15.78 0.00 15.78 100.0%
Miscellaneous Revenue
S.C.O.R.E. 5,300.89 0.00 5,300.89 100.0%
Other Income 1,213.61 0.00 1,213.61 100.0%
Total Miscellaneous Revenue 6,514.50 0.00 6,514.50 100.0% Total Revenues 65,474.75 146,709.27 -81,234.52 44.63%
Expenditures
Late Fee 21.29 0.00 21.29 100.0%
Repairs & Maintenance 190.05 5,000.00 -4,809.95 3.8%
Building Repairs 65.39 6,200.00 -6,134.61 1.06%
Utilities
Security 72.00
Internet - Broadband 272.50
Propane 1,539.63
Electric 1,568.37
Garbage Disposal 281.88
Total Utilities 3,734.38 15,000.00 -11,265.62 24.9%
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 170.36 500.00 -329.64 34.07% Solid Waste Benefit Assessment 3,418.75 6,837.50 -3,418.75 50.0% Salaries and Wages 29,050.69 52,164.27 -23,113.58 55.69% Employee Benefits 5,937.40 12,400.00 -6,462.60 47.88%
Services and Supplies
Postage 358.27 750.00 -391.73 47.77%
Advertising 86.19 0.00 86.19 100.0%
Automobile Expense - Fuel 1,053.77 800.00 253.77 131.72% Bank Service Charges 83.82 75.00 8.82 111.76%
Contracted Services
Draft
2:13 PM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
General
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
Jul 1 - Dec 12, 22 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget
Building Permits 829.20
Housing Element 3,115.00
FEMA 100.00
Professional Fees 6,581.00
Auditing Expense 2,248.50
Accounting & Financial 2,135.00
Law Enforcement 3,750.00
Council Expense 4,500.00
Total Contracted Services 23,258.70 45,000.00 -21,741.30 51.69% Dues and Subscriptions 154.42 120.00 34.42 128.68%
Insurance
Auto Insurrance 741.51
Workers Comp. 1,123.24
Liability Insurance 2,107.84
Property Insurance 15,978.95
Travel for SCORE 356.40
Insurance - Other 763.94
Total Insurance 21,071.88 25,000.00 -3,928.12 84.29%
Office Expense 1,788.17 3,000.00 -1,211.83 59.61%
Operating Supplies 403.20 500.00 -96.80 80.64%
Telephone 168.63 400.00 -231.37 42.16%
Travel 56.50 300.00 -243.50 18.83%
Total Services and Supplies 48,483.55 75,945.00 -27,461.45 63.84% Total Expenditures 91,071.86 174,046.77 -82,974.91 52.33% Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures
before other financing sources (uses) -25,597.11 -27,337.50 1,740.39 93.63% Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Sale of Assets 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 100.0%
Operating Transfers In 0.00 12,400.00 -12,400.00 0.0%
Operating Transfers Out -10,000.00 -10,000.00 0.00 100.0% Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (8,500) 2,400 (10,900) -354.17% Net Change in Fund Balances $ (34,097) $ (24,938)
Draft
10:32 AM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
Streets Highways
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
FEMA -
Flood of
2017
SNOW

REMOVAL
Streets and
Highways -
Other Total Streets and Highways Jul 1 -
Dec 12,
22 Jul 1 - Dec
12, 22
Jul 1 - Dec
12, 22
Jul 1 -
Dec 12,
22 Budget
$ Over
Budget
% of
Budget
Revenues
Road Maintenance & Rehab 0 0 6,772 6,772 15,000 -8,228 45.14% VLF Swap 0 0 0 0 31,000 -31,000 0.0%
Highway Users Tax 0 0 16,314 16,314 20,000 -3,687 81.57% Total Revenues 0 0 23,085 23,085 66,000 -42,915 34.98%
Expenditures
Tools & Equipment 0 0 0 0 2,250 -2,250 0.0%
Repairs & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 10,000 -10,000 0.0%
Utilities: Electric 0 0 10,180 10,180 25,000 -14,820 40.72% Equipment Repair & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 5,000 -5,000 0.0% Solid Waste Benefit Assessment 0 0 265 265 531 -265 50.0% Total Salaries and Wages 1,846 173 1,697 3,716 8,800 -5,257 40.27% Services and Supplies
Automobile Expense: Fuel 0 0 24 24 1,500 -1,476 1.62%
Contracted Services
Professional Fees 0 1,350 1,350 2,700 0 2,700 100.0%
Auditing Expense 0 0 2,998 2,998 0 2,998 100.0%
Contracted Services - Other 0 0 0 0 8,000 -8,000 0.0%
Total Contracted Services 0 1,350 4,348 5,698 8,000 -2,302 71.23% Equipment Rental 174 0 0 174 0 174 100.0%
Insurance 0 0 3,582 3,582 4,000 -418 89.56%
Office Expense 0 0 33 33 200 -167 16.45%
Operating Supplies 975 0 0 975 719 256 135.59%
Total Services and Supplies 1,149 1,350 7,987 10,486 14,419 -3,933 72.73% Total Expenditures 2,995 1,523 20,130 24,648 66,000 -41,352 37.35% Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures
before other financing sources (uses) -2,995 -1,523 2,955 -1,563 0 -1,563 100.0% Other Financing Sources (Uses) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0%
Net Change in Fund Balances $ (2,995) $ (1,563)
Draft
9:41 AM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
Fire Department
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
Jul 1 - Dec 12, 22 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget
Revenues
Service Area Revenue- Fire Prot $ - $ 46,850 $ (46,850) 0.0% Charges for Current Services - Other - 494 (494) 0.0%
Interest Income 19 150 (131) 12.59%
Total Revenues 19 47,494 (47,475) 0.04%
Expenditures
Tools & Equipment 16 1,000 (984) 1.58%
Repairs & Maintenance 259 2,000 (1,741) 12.96%
Utilities
Internet - Broadband 545 -
Propane 414 -
Electric 2,210 -
Garbage Disposal 134 -
Utilities - Other - 6,000
Total Utilities 3,303 6,000 (2,697) 55.06%
Equipment Repair & Maintenance 6,296 5,000 1,296 125.93% Solid Waste Benefit Assessment 508 1,015 (508) 50.0%
Salaries and Wages 979 994 (14) 98.57%
Services and Supplies
Automobile Expense - Fuel 668 4,000 (3,332) 16.69%
Contracted Services
Auditing Expense 1,499 -
Accounting & Financial 245 -
Contracted Services - Other 350 2,000
Total Contracted Services 2,094 2,000 94 104.7%
Insurance 24,772 30,000 (5,228) 82.58%
Operating Supplies 1,169 4,815 (3,646) 24.27%
Telephone 280 670 (390) 41.74%
Total Services and Supplies 28,982 41,485 (12,502) 69.86% Debt Service 15,536 (15,536) 0.0%
Total Expenditures 40,344 73,030 (32,686) 55.24%
Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures
before other financing sources (uses) (40,325) (25,536) (14,789) 157.91% Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Operating Transfers In 10,000 10,000 - 100.0%
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 10,000 10,000 - 100.0% Net Change in Fund Balances $ (30,325) $ (15,536)
Draft
2:53 PM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
Enterprise Funds
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
VanDaam
Creek
Repair 2022
Emergency
Repair - Oct
2022
Water Fund
7520-1 - Other
Total Water Fund 7520-1
Jul 1 - Dec
12, 22
Jul 1 - Dec
12, 22
Jul 1 - Dec 12,
22 Jul 1 - Dec
12, 22 Budget
$ Over
Budget % of Budget
Revenues
Total Enterprise Income $ - $ - $ 127,810 $ 127,810 $ 300,000 $ (172,190) 42.6% Revenue Use of Money & Property
Dividend Income- CalTrust - - - - - - 0.0%
Interest Income
LAIF Interest Income - - - - - - 0.0%
Interest Income - Other - - 21 21 - 21 100.0%
Total Interest Income - - 21 21 - 21 100.0%
Total Revenue Use of Money & Property - - 21 21 100 (79) 20.58% Total Revenues - - 127,831 127,831 300,100 (172,269) 42.6% Expense
Tools & Equipment - - - - 2,000 (2,000) 0.0%
Repairs & Maintenance - 284,936 41,130 326,066 375,000 (48,934) 86.95% Building Repairs - - - - - - 0.0%
Utilities - - 42,352 42,352 80,000 (37,648) 52.94%
Equipment Repair & Maintenance - - 2,375 2,375 3,150 (775) 75.4% Solid Waste Benefit Assessment - - 153 153 200 (47) 76.31% Salaries and Wages 52 12,918 34,005 46,975 88,000 (41,025) 53.38% Employee Benefits - - 9,295 9,295 18,600 (9,305) 49.97% Services and Supplies
Postage - - 664 664 1,800 (1,136) 36.87%
Total Automobile Expense - 184 1,541 1,725 1,500 225 115.01% Bank Service Charges - - 11 11 50 (39) 22.0%
Chemicals - - 4,581 4,581 8,000 (3,419) 57.26%
Contracted Services
Professional Fees - 525 410 935
Auditing Expense - - 4,497 4,497
Accounting & Financial - - 770 770
Testing - 358 2,069 2,427
Total Contracted Services - 883 7,746 8,629 25,000 (16,371) 34.52% Dues and Subscriptions - - 175 175 1,800 (1,625) 9.72%
Equipment Rental - 100 - 100 - 100 100.0%
Insurance - - 26,708 26,708 32,000 (5,292) 83.46%
Licenses and Permits - - 712 712 4,000 (3,288) 17.8%
Office Expense - - 821 821 2,000 (1,179) 41.07%
Operating Supplies - 1,210 286 1,496 2,000 (504) 74.82% Telephone - - 294 294 1,000 (706) 29.41%
Total Services and Supplies - 2,378 43,539 45,917 79,150 (33,233) 58.01% Total Debt Service - - 42,416 42,416 62,000 (19,584) 68.41% Total Expenditures 52 300,232 215,265 515,549 708,100 (192,551) 72.81% Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures
before other financing sources (uses) (52) (300,232) (87,435) (387,719) (408,000) 20,281 95.03% Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Exsisting Fund Assets Budgeted for Use 115,069 166,117 (51,047) 69.27% Operating Transfers In 187,378 191,883 (4,506) 97.65%
Operating Transfers Out - 0.0%
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 302,447 358,000 (55,553) 84.48% Net Change (including use of exsisting assets) (85,272) (50,000) (35,272) 170.54% Net Change in Fund Balances $ (200,341)
Draft
2:53 PM
12/12/22
Accrual Basis
City of Loyalton
Enterprise Funds
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance July 1 through December 12, 2022
Revenues
Total Enterprise Income
Revenue Use of Money & Property
Dividend Income- CalTrust
Interest Income
LAIF Interest Income
Interest Income - Other
Total Interest Income
Total Revenue Use of Money & Property
Total Revenues
Expense
Tools & Equipment
Repairs & Maintenance
Building Repairs
Utilities
Equipment Repair & Maintenance
Solid Waste Benefit Assessment
Salaries and Wages
Employee Benefits
Services and Supplies
Postage
Total Automobile Expense
Bank Service Charges
Chemicals
Contracted Services
Professional Fees
Auditing Expense
Accounting & Financial
Testing
Total Contracted Services
Dues and Subscriptions
Equipment Rental
Insurance
Licenses and Permits
Office Expense
Operating Supplies
Telephone
Total Services and Supplies
Total Debt Service
Total Expenditures
Excess (deficit) of revenues over expenditures
before other financing sources (uses)
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Exsisting Fund Assets Budgeted for Use
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers Out
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Net Change (including use of exsisting assets)
Net Change in Fund Balances
Total Sewer Fund 7580-1
Total Enterprise
Jul 1 - Dec 12, 22 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget Jul 1 - Dec 12, 22 $ 172,269 $ 401,000 $ (228,731) 42.96% $ 300,079
233 - 233 100.0% 233
10,747 - 10,747 100.0% 10,747
96 - 96 100.0% 117
10,843 - 10,843 100.0% 10,864
11,076 5,000 6,076 221.52% 11,097
183,345 406,000 (222,655) 45.16% 311,176
- 500 (500) 0.0%
182 2,000 (1,818) 9.12% 326,249
- 500 (500) 0.0%
18,185 34,000 (15,815) 53.49% 60,537
2,692 5,000 (2,308) 53.84% 5,067
531 900 (369) 59.02% 684
52,755 93,650 (40,895) 56.33% 99,731
9,295 19,000 (9,705) 48.92% 18,590
664 1,800 (1,136) 36.87% 1,327
2,412 2,000 412 120.58% 4,137
15 50 (35) 30.0% 26
77 - 77 100.0% 4,657
823 1,758
4,497 8,994
770 1,540
2,652 5,079
8,742 15,000 (6,259) 58.28% 17,371
175 1,000 (825) 17.5% 350
- - - 0.0% 100
33,437 32,000 1,437 104.49% 60,145
175 21,000 (20,825) 0.83% 887
821 2,000 (1,179) 41.07% 1,643
2,274 1,000 1,274 227.4% 3,770
533 1,600 (1,067) 33.31% 827
49,323 77,450 (28,127) 63.68% 95,240
220,813 223,000 (2,187) 99.02% 263,229
353,778 456,000 (102,222) 77.58% 869,327
(170,432) (50,000) (120,432) 340.86% (558,151)
- 0.0% 273,005
- 0.0% 29,442
(157,936) (191,886) 33,950 82.31%
(157,936) (191,886) 33,950 82.31% 302,447
(328,368) (241,886) (86,482) 135.75% (255,704)
$ (328,368) $ (528,709)
Draft
Date Num Adj Name Memo Class Clr Split Debit Credit Balance BofA CC 4046-R. DeMartini
11/01/2022 Bank of America **** **** **** 4046 RD (10.05.2019-11.04.2019) Fire Department 7707:Fire ... Accounts Payable 261.11 -261.11 BofA CC 6111- K LeBlanc
Total BofA CC 4046-R. DeMartini 261.11 0.00 -261.11
11/01/2022 Bank of America **** **** **** 6111(KL) 06.05_07.04.22 General Fund 11/01/2022 Gaia Hotel SCORE - Credit to be posted for $55.00 Travel for SCORE 55.00 -577.86 11/01/2022 Nextiva No invoices provided, monthly charge X -SPLIT- 103.42 -522.86 11/01/2022 92191 Jefferson Supply ... Emergency Supplies for Willow St water line break caused ... X Operating Supplies 626.28 -626.28 Accounts Payable 820.37 -1,398.23
11/16/2022 11.16... UserWay
11/14/2022 657 Set up and Test "Virtual Terminal" with PayPal General Fund:General Gov... Bank Service Charges 0.41 -1,385.32 11/06/2022 Microsoft Office Expense 12.50 -1,385.73
ADA Compliance software Dues and Subscriptions 49.00 -1,336.32 11/17/2022 693 Leonards - Gift Cards for Employee Bonuses General Fund:General Gov... 11/16/2022 P570... Batteries Plus PO 7051 -SPLIT- 314.92 -1,021.40 Cash Drawer 600.00 -421.40
11/26/2022
11/25/2022 Intuit Inc. Payroll -SPLIT- 10.00 329.28
11/17/2022 1040... Quill PO 7052 -SPLIT- 177.73 319.28
11/17/2022 Whites Sierra St... -SPLIT- 562.95 141.55
AmazonPrime Dues and Subscriptions 16.08 345.36
Total BofA CC 6111- K LeBlanc 1,501.65 1,847.01 345.36
TOTAL 1,762.76 1,847.01 84.25
3:53 PM City of Loyalton
12/13/22 Credit Card Detail
Accrual Basis November 2022

Type Date Num Name Memo Paid Amount
Enterprise Loan MM 0559
Check 11/30/2022 Service Charge -2.00
Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 182 USDA 92-01 Interest Payment -14,099.34 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 183 USDA 92-03 Interest Payment -2,135.04 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 184 USDA 92-07 Interest Payment -35,125.00 Total Enterprise Loan MM 0559 -51,361.38
General Funds
General Checking 1956- NEW
Transfer 11/16/2022 Cover repairs from flood on Willow St 2,995.20 Transfer 11/21/2022 Closing Cal Trust Account to Pay Farr West 81,223.04 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/08/2022 AP QuickBooks generated zero amount transa... 0.00 Transfer 12/13/2022 Need to split by funds 2,000.00
Liability Ch... 11/08/2022 E-pay Employment Development... 69817369 PPE 11/05/22 QB Tracking # 912... -345.41 Liability Ch... 11/08/2022 E-pay US Treasury-941 94-6000364 PPE 11/05/22 QB Tracking # 9... -2,400.32 Liability Ch... 11/21/2022 E-pay US Treasury-941 94-6000364 QB Tracking # 1013399478 -99.46 Liability Ch... 11/21/2022 E-pay Employment Development... 69817369 QB Tracking # 1013409478 -408.85 Liability Ch... 11/21/2022 E-pay US Treasury-941 94-6000364 QB Tracking # 1013417478 -2,594.74 Liability Ch... 12/06/2022 E-pay Employment Development... 69817369 PPE 12/03/22 QB Tracking # 157... -337.92 Liability Ch... 12/06/2022 E-pay US Treasury-941 94-6000364 PPE 12/03/22 QB Tracking # 1... -2,329.12 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7842 Darlene Riede November 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7843 Donald Yegge Retiree November 2022 Pension Payment -537.69 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7844 Jerry Gerow November 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7845 John Cussins Retiree November 2022 Pension Payment -1,226.83 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7846 Joy Markum November 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7847 Kathy LeBlanc November 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7848 Orville McGarity Retiree November 2022 Pension Payment -280.97 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7849 Patsy Jardin Retiree November 2022 Pension Payment -2,000.79 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/01/2022 7850 Sarah Jackson November 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7858 Bastian Engineering Groundwater Gradient -428.75 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7859 FERNANDO A FLORES Misc Fleet Service/Repairs -3,938.09 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7860 Gina-Marie Morris Oct 2022 - Mileage for Bank Cash Deposits -28.25 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7861 Kathy LeBlanc Mileage for SCORE 10/27 and 10/28 -247.50 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7862 Liberty Utilities -7,494.67 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7863 Pitney Bowes Inc Purchas... VOID: 8000-9000-0953-9911 0.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7864 Plumas-Sierra Telecomm. -218.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7865 Plumas Sierra Rural Electric -7,045.64 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7866 Sierra Valley Home Center 1100 -242.05 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7867 Silver State Analytical Lab... Effluent Weir -107.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/08/2022 7868 Verizon Wireless 370745244-000001 -38.01 Paycheck 11/10/2022 7869 Bennett, Kenneth E -2,143.84
Paycheck 11/10/2022 7870 LeBlanc, Katherine L -812.68
Paycheck 11/10/2022 7871 Lundy, Justus -1,117.53
Paycheck 11/10/2022 7872 Morris, Gina-Marie L -1,474.69 Paycheck 11/10/2022 7873 Morris, Raymond J -1,119.56
Paycheck 11/10/2022 7874 Reeves, Jonathan -1,768.64
Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7875 Feather River Porperty Ma... 6'x14' Flatbed Trailer Rental - Used for Farr ... -100.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7876 Intermountain Disposal, Inc. -168.66 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7877 Kelly Champion -765.00
Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7878 L. N. Curtis & Sons Avon SCBA Flow Testing -1,512.50 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7879 Northern Sierra Air Quality... Air Pollution Permit -79.60 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7880 Porter Simon Professional ... 92132-13200M -850.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7881 Sierra County Auditor Police Contract -1,250.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7882 Silver State Analytical Lab... -249.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/15/2022 7883 Pitney Bowes Inc Purchas... 8000-9000-0953-9911 -192.92 Paycheck 11/23/2022 7884 Bennett, Kenneth E -2,221.81
Paycheck 11/23/2022 7885 LeBlanc, Katherine L -592.22
Paycheck 11/23/2022 7886 Lundy, Justus -1,276.56
Paycheck 11/23/2022 7887 Morris, Gina-Marie L -1,495.82 Paycheck 11/23/2022 7888 Morris, Raymond J -1,391.32
Paycheck 11/23/2022 7889 Reeves, Jonathan -1,970.99
11:02 AM City of Loyalton
12/14/22 Bills Paid
Cash Basis As of December 14, 2022

Type Date Num Name Memo Paid Amount
Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/23/2022 7890 Farr Construction Corporat... Water Main Repair - Waiting for verification ... -284,936.42 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7891 Darlene Riede December 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7892 Donald Yegge Retiree December 2022 Pension Payment -537.69 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7893 Jerry Gerow December 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7894 John Cussins Retiree December 2022 Pension Payment -1,226.83 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7895 Joy Markum December 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7896 Kathy LeBlanc December 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7897 Orville McGarity Retiree December 2022 Pension Payment -280.97 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7898 Patsy Jardin Retiree December 2022 Pension Payment -2,000.79 Bill Pmt -Ch... 12/01/2022 7899 Sarah Jackson December 2022 City Council -150.00 Bill Pmt -Ch... 11/30/2022 7900 Postmaster Water Sewer Billing -146.08 Paycheck 12/08/2022 7901 Bennett, Kenneth E -2,109.41
Paycheck 12/08/2022 7902 LeBlanc, Katherine L -596.32
Paycheck 12/08/2022 7903 Lundy, Justus -1,238.97
Paycheck 12/08/2022 7904 Morris, Gina-Marie L -1,478.37 Paycheck 12/08/2022 7905 Morris, Raymond J -1,391.30
Paycheck 12/08/2022 7906 Reeves, Jonathan -1,643.18
Total General Checking 1956- NEW -267,771.49
General Contingency Saving 0322
Total General Contingency Saving 0322
Total General Funds -267,771.49
Designated Funds
WWTP Settlement MM 4321
Total WWTP Settlement MM 4321
WWTP Construction 1990
Total WWTP Construction 1990
FEMA Flood Savings 0059
Transfer 11/16/2022 Cover repairs from flood on Willow St -2,995.20 Total FEMA Flood Savings 0059 -2,995.20
Total Designated Funds -2,995.20
TOTAL -322,128.07
11:02 AM City of Loyalton
12/14/22 Bills Paid
Cash Basis As of December 14, 2022

Type Date Num Due Date Aging Open Balance
AT&T Fire Landline BAN 9343
Bill 11/12/2022 00001... 12/12/2022 37 30.62
Total AT&T Fire Landline BAN 9343 30.62
AT&T Fire Pager BAN 54523
Bill 11/12/2022 00001... 12/12/2022 37 23.30
Total AT&T Fire Pager BAN 54523 23.30
AT&T Sewer BAN 54522
Bill 11/12/2022 00001... 12/12/2022 37 45.23
Total AT&T Sewer BAN 54522 45.23
Bank of America
Bill 11/01/2022 12/01/2022 48 820.37
Bill 11/01/2022 12/01/2022 48 261.11
Total Bank of America 1,081.48
Ca. State Water Resources Control Board
Bill 12/08/2022 WD-0... 01/07/2023 11 3,453.00
Bill 12/08/2022 WD-0... 01/07/2023 11 24,687.00
Total Ca. State Water Resources Control Board 28,140.00 Clark Pest Control of Stockton Inc.

Bill 11/21/2022 32012... 11/21/2022 58 100.00
Total Clark Pest Control of Stockton Inc. 100.00
CTL Forest Management, Inc.

Bill 12/02/2022 C1605... 01/01/2023 17 1,350.00
Total CTL Forest Management, Inc. 1,350.00
Farr West Engineering
Bill 11/04/2022 18793 12/04/2022 45 17,516.78
Total Farr West Engineering 17,516.78
High Sierra Gas LLC
Bill 11/09/2022 U0324... 12/09/2022 40 328.05
Bill 11/16/2022 25932 12/16/2022 33 2,064.14
Bill 11/16/2022 25929 12/16/2022 33 544.92
Bill 11/16/2022 25928 12/16/2022 33 614.38
Bill 11/16/2022 25918 12/16/2022 33 414.19
Total High Sierra Gas LLC 3,965.68
Intermountain Disposal, Inc.

Bill 11/30/2022 74298 12/30/2022 19 168.66
Total Intermountain Disposal, Inc. 168.66
Ken Morgan
Bill 12/02/2022 22100 01/01/2023 17 2,233.47
Total Ken Morgan 2,233.47
Liberty Utilities
Bill 11/23/2022 88504... 12/12/2022 37 1,774.02
Bill 11/28/2022 88502... 12/15/2022 34 97.76
Bill 11/28/2022 88544... 12/15/2022 34 241.12
Bill 11/28/2022 88502... 12/15/2022 34 115.62
Bill 11/28/2022 88502... 12/15/2022 34 318.59
Bill 11/28/2022 88501... 12/15/2022 34 129.68
Bill 11/28/2022 88502... 12/15/2022 34 31.86
Bill 11/28/2022 88549... 12/15/2022 34 25.67
Bill 11/28/2022 88547... 12/15/2022 34 2,740.02
11:00 AM City of Loyalton
12/14/22 Unpaid Bills Detail
As of December 14, 2022

Type Date Num Due Date Aging Open Balance
Bill 11/28/2022 88552... 12/28/2022 21 536.29
Total Liberty Utilities 6,010.63
Pitney Bowes Inc Purchase Power
Bill 11/11/2022 12/08/2022 41 176.00
Total Pitney Bowes Inc Purchase Power 176.00
Pitney Bowes Lease
Bill 11/25/2022 31058... 11/25/2022 54 164.55
Total Pitney Bowes Lease 164.55
Plumas-Sierra Telecomm.

Bill 11/30/2022 66807 12/30/2022 19 109.00
Bill 11/30/2022 37225 12/30/2022 19 109.00
Total Plumas-Sierra Telecomm. 218.00
Plumas Sierra Rural Electric
Bill 11/30/2022 2941 12/30/2022 19 97.03
Bill 11/30/2022 17386 12/30/2022 19 7,087.66
Total Plumas Sierra Rural Electric 7,184.69
Porter Simon Professional Services
Bill 11/30/2022 168 11/30/2022 49 725.00
Total Porter Simon Professional Services 725.00
Sierra County Auditor
Bill 12/01/2022 12/31/2022 18 1,250.00
Bill 01/01/2023 01/31/2023 1,250.00
Total Sierra County Auditor 2,500.00
Sierra County Clerk-Recorder
Bill 12/01/2022 11.08.... 12/31/2022 18 554.02
Total Sierra County Clerk-Recorder 554.02
Sierra Valley Home Center
Bill 10/29/2022 209419 11/10/2022 69 11.79
Bill 10/31/2022 210265 11/10/2022 69 14.99
Bill 10/27/2022 208187 11/10/2022 69 10.71
Bill 10/25/2022 208173 11/10/2022 69 72.87
Bill 10/26/2022 208164 11/10/2022 69 25.70
Bill 11/09/2022 209130 12/09/2022 40 117.41
Bill 11/21/2022 209655 12/10/2022 39 55.21
Bill 11/09/2022 209132 12/10/2022 39 17.40
Bill 11/08/2022 209108 12/10/2022 39 2.67
Bill 11/07/2022 209479 12/10/2022 39 16.08
Total Sierra Valley Home Center 344.83
Silver State Analytical Laboratories, Inc
Bill 11/15/2022 RN29... 12/15/2022 34 207.00
Bill 11/23/2022 RN29... 12/23/2022 26 70.00
Bill 11/29/2022 RN29... 12/29/2022 20 70.00
Bill 11/30/2022 RN29... 12/30/2022 19 70.00
Bill 12/08/2022 RN29... 01/07/2023 11 70.00
Total Silver State Analytical Laboratories, Inc 487.00
State Water Resources Control Board
Bill 11/14/2022 Jonat... 12/14/2022 35 95.00
Total State Water Resources Control Board 95.00
Thatcher Company
Credit 07/01/2022 20214... -214.50
11:00 AM City of Loyalton
12/14/22 Unpaid Bills Detail
As of December 14, 2022

Type Date Num Due Date Aging Open Balance
Credit 09/16/2022 20224... -343.20
Credit 11/17/2022 20224... -343.20
Bill 11/11/2022 20224... 12/11/2022 38 2,153.87
Total Thatcher Company 1,252.97
Verizon Wireless
Bill 11/18/2022 99208... 12/10/2022 39 38.01
Total Verizon Wireless 38.01
Xerox Corporation
Bill 11/01/2022 01749... 12/01/2022 48 320.47
Total Xerox Corporation 320.47
TOTAL 74,726.39
11:00 AM City of Loyalton
12/14/22 Unpaid Bills Detail
As of December 14, 2022

Acknowledgement of Approval, City of Loyalton
The City of Loyalton acknowledges approval of the below listed reconciled Plumas Bank Accounts
General Account (1956) 11/30/2022 ($87,414.22) Reconciled 12/13/2022 FEMA Flood Sav (0059) 11/30/2022 ($52,482.88) Reconciled 12/13/2022 F.D. Reserve (7243) 11/30/2022 ($128,874.45) Reconciled 12/13/2022 General Savings(0322) 11/30/2022 ($0.00) Reconciled 12/13/2022 Enterprise-W&S (0559) 11/30/2022 ($91,435.19) Reconciled 12/13/2022 WWTP Settle. (4387) 11/30/2022 ($178,091.75) Reconciled 12/13/2022 PayPAL (CCard POAs) 11/30/2022 ($553.03) Reconciled 12/13/2022 LAIF Account (496) 11/30/2022 ($2,045,633.85) Reconciled 12/13/2022 CalTrust (29130) 11/30/2022 ($0.00) Reconciled 12/13/2022 This authorization took place at the council meeting held on 12/20/22 and will be further reflected in the council minutes of this meeting.
________________________ ____________________ Sarah Jackson, Mayor, Dated 12/20/22 Authorized Signature
Acknowledgement of Approval, City of Loyalton
The City of Loyalton acknowledges approval of the below listed Transfer(s) of Funds.

Transfer From Transfer To Date Amount
General Fund Enterprise Loan MM 0559 12/02/2022
Water 1,500.00
Sewer 4,500.00
General Fund Enterprise Loan MM 0559 12/09/2022
Water 1,500.00
Sewer 4,500.00
General Fund Enterprise Loan MM 0559 12/16/2022
Water 1,500.00
Sewer 4,500.00
General Fund Enterprise Loan MM 0559 12/23/2022
Water 1,500.00
Sewer 4,500.00
General Fund Enterprise Loan MM 0559 12/30/2022
Water 1,500.00
Sewer 4,500.00

THIS TOTAL $30,000.00
This authorization took place at the council meeting held on 12/20/2022 and will be further reflected in the council minutes of this meeting.
____________________________________________ Sarah Jackson, Mayor, Dated 12/20/2022 Authorized Signature
Acknowledgement of Approval, City of Loyalton
The City of Loyalton acknowledges approval of the below listed Transfer(s) of Funds.

Transfer From Transfer To Date Amount
WWTP Settlement (LAIF) General 12/02/2022
Sewer 34,887.18
**This transfer is to cover the Pension Payments for 22/23

THIS TOTAL $34,887.18
This authorization took place at the council meeting held on 12/20/2022 and will be further reflected in the council minutes of this meeting.
____________________________________________ Sarah Jackson, Mayor, Dated 12/20/2022 Authorized Signature
1 CITY OF LOYALTON

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MEETING OF: December 20, 2022
Subject: Zoning Interpretation-Wireless Facilities
From: Gary Price, Contract Planner
Recommended Action: By vote of the Council (minute order), in accordance with Section

12.08.22, Subsection 1-10-B, of the Zoning Code, determine that the current zoning code allows wireless tower in all zone districts with a conditional use permit.

BACKGROUND: Epic Wireless on behalf of Verizon Wireless, has inquired about the installation of a wireless tower in the City. The City needs to provide Epic with an answer as to what level of planning review the City will require for such an installation.

Although not defined by City Code, a wireless tower means any structure built for the sole purpose or primary purpose of supporting FCC licensed or authorized antennas and their associated facilities. The City’s Zoning Code does not reference wireless facilities. Section

12.08.22, Subsection 1-10-B, allows the City Council to determine whether a particular use that is not listed in the Code to be allowed by right or subject to a conditional use permit. determine that the current zoning code allows wireless facilities in all zone districts with a conditional use permit.

Section 12.08.22, Subsection 1-10-B of the Zoning Code, regarding, Scale on Zoning Map states:
“B. The City Council, by written findings, may interpret any of the provisions of this Part and may determine what additional uses may be permitted with or without use permits in any zone district because of similarity and compatibility with listed uses. Said findings shall clearly set forth the justification for the interpretation. Such interpretations shall not be used to circumvent other available established procedures such as conditional use permits and variances.

ANALYSIS: Wireless towers are a rather unique type of use and could be considered a type of public utility that might be allowed with or without a Conditional Use Permit in some or all of the zoning districts, such as:

R-1- Single-Family Residential
R-2-Multiple Family Residential
C-1-Commercial
2 C-2-Highway Commercial
C-3-Heavy Commercial
M-1-Light Industrial
M-2-Heavy Industrial
P-D-Planned Development
O-S-Open Space
P-F-Public Facility
As an allowed use, the City would have no discretion as to location, design, or denial of an installation. As a use subject to a conditional use permit, an installation could be allowed at the discretion of the City Council if certain findings can be made in accordance with Section

12.08.19-4 as follows:
“That the establishment, maintenance or operation of the use of building applied for will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be materially detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be materially detrimental to property or improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City.“
Also, with a conditional use permit, the City would have the ability to add conditions to an installation to make it more compatible with the neighborhood.

Sierra County has processed a number of wireless tower installations and they require a conditional use permit for these uses. Similar to how the County processes these requests, staff suggests that a wireless tower in Loyalton, which is visually apparent from most locations in the City, should be subject to a conditional use permit. Since public utilities typically can be located in any zoning district, staff also suggests that such wireless towers be evaluated on a case by case basis with a conditional use permit in all zone districts.

ALTERNATIVES: The City Council should provide written findings in interpreting the Zoning Code to address wireless towers by zoning district. Options include allowing these by right or allowing them with a conditional use permit.

Height Variance Requirements: Regardless of the Council’s determination on whether a conditional use permit would be required for an installation, since a wireless tower is typically taller than what the zoning code allows, a variance to building/structure height is required. For example, if an installation is located in the R-1 Zone, where the maximum height allowed is 30 feet, a variance application would be required since a wireless tower is typically 80 feet tall or taller. In a C-1 Zone, where the maximum allowed height is 60 feet, an installation would also require a variance. Similar to a conditional use permit, a variance is subject to approval by the City Council based on findings and may include conditions of approval. In most cases conditional use permit and variance applications can be processed together and the Council can consider both applications in one public hearing.

SECONDARY DISCUSSION: Epic is contemplating locating a wireless tower in the City, on City owned property, so the Council does have the opportunity to provide staff some direction on possible options and preferences for a particular wireless tower style. In this case, a wireless tower, either looking like a tall pine tree (monopine) versus a standard structure (monopole) may be proposed at the northwest corner of Lewis and Railroad Avenues (see Exhibits A through F). The 3 Council is welcome to offer some suggestions to staff and Epic as to appearance preferences for such a possible project. If the existing trees around the site are similar height to the 90 foot tall installation, then a monopine might be less visually prevalent and therefore more compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. On the other hand, if the monopine is much taller than the surrounding trees, a monopine might stick out more than the appearance of a monopole. There are pros and cons to either type of installation that the Council might be interested in discussing. Epic Wireless representatives will be available by Zoom at the meeting to answer any technical questions about a wireless tower.

ATTACHMENTS:

Exhibit A-Site Location Map
Exhibit B-Aerial Photo of Site
Exhibit C-Zoning Map Site Identification
Exhibit D-Site Photos
Exhibit E-Monopole Wireless Tower Example
Exhibit F-Monopine Wireless Tower Example
4 EXHIBIT A
Site Location Map
5 EXHIBIT B
Aerial Photo of Site
6 EXHIBIT C
Zoning Map Site Identification
7 EXHIBIT D
Site Photos
8 9
10 EXHIBIT E
Monopole Example
Wireless Tower
11 EXHIBIT F
Monopine Example
Wireless Tower
Conflicts of Interest
The City Council will annually review the adopted Conflict of Interest Policy. See Enclosure 3.

Council members and staff are expected to disclose potential or existing conflicts of interest at least annually and throughout the year on a regular and consistent basis.

No council member shall participate in the selection or award of a contract if a conflict of interest real or perceived, would be involved.

ENCLOSURE 3

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

ARTICLE I - PURPOSE
The purpose of the conflict of interest policy is to protect The City of Loyalton’s (City) interest when it is contemplating entering into a transaction or arrangement that might benefit the private interest of an officer or council member of the City or might result in a possible excess benefit transaction. This policy is intended to supplement but not replace any applicable state and federal laws governing conflict of interest.

ARTICLE II - DEFINITIONS

1. “Interested Person.” Any council member, officer, or member of a committee with governing delegated powers, who has a direct or indirect financial interest, as defined below, is an interested person.

2. “Financial Interest.” A person has a financial interest if the person has, directly or indirectly, through business, investment, or family:
a. An ownership or investment interest in any entity with which the City has a transaction or arrangement, b. A compensation arrangement with the City or with any entity or individual with which the City has a transaction or arrangement, or
c. An opportunity to acquire an ownership or investment interest in, or compensation arrangement with, any entity or individual with which the City is negotiating a transaction or arrangement. Compensation includes direct and indirect remuneration as well as gifts or favors that are not insubstantial. A “Financial Interest” is not necessarily a conflict of interest. Under Article III, Section 2, a person who has a financial interest may have a conflict of interest only if the appropriate governing council or committee decides that a conflict of interest exists.

ARTICLE III - PROCEDURES

1. Duty to Disclose. In connection with any actual or possible conflict of interest, an interested person must disclose the existence of the “Financial Interest” and be given the opportunity to disclose all material facts to the directors and members of committees with governing council delegated powers considering the proposed transaction or arrangement.

2. Determining Whether a Conflict of Interest Exists. After disclosure of the “Financial Interest” and all material facts, and after any discussion with the “Interested Person”, he/she shall leave the governing Council or committee meeting while the determination of a conflict of interest is discussed and voted upon. The remaining council or committee members shall decide if a conflict of interest exists.

3. Procedures for Addressing the Conflict of Interest
a. An “Interested Person” may make a presentation at the governing council or committee meeting, but after the presentation, he/she shall leave the meeting during the discussion of, and the vote on, the transaction or arrangement involving the possible conflict of interest. b. The chairperson of the governing council or committee shall, if appropriate, appoint a disinterested person or committee to investigate alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement. c. After exercising due diligence, the governing council or committee shall determine whether the City can obtain with reasonable efforts a more advantageous transaction or arrangement from a person or entity that would not give rise to a conflict of interest.
d. If a more advantageous transaction or arrangement is not reasonably possible under circumstances not producing a conflict of interest, the governing council or committee shall determine by a majority vote of the disinterested council members whether the transaction or arrangement is in the City’s best interest, for its own benefit, and whether it is fair and reasonable. In conformity with the above determination it shall make its decision as to whether to enter into the transaction or arrangement.

4. Violations of the Conflicts of Interest Policy
a. If the governing council or committee has reasonable cause to believe a member has failed to disclose actual or possible conflicts of interest, it shall inform the member of the basis for such belief and afford the member an opportunity to explain the alleged failure to disclose. b. If, after hearing the member’s response and after making further investigation as warranted by the circumstances, the governing council or committee determines the member has failed to disclose an actual or possible conflict of interest, it shall take appropriate disciplinary and corrective action.

ARTICLE IV - RECORDS OF PROCEEDINGS
The minutes of the governing council and all committees with council delegated powers shall contain:
a. The names of the persons who disclosed or otherwise were found to have a “Financial Interest” in connection with an actual or possible conflict of interest, the nature of the “Financial Interest”, any action taken to determine whether a conflict of interest was present, and the governing council’s or committee’s decision as to whether a conflict of interest in fact existed.
b. The names of the persons who were present for discussions and votes relating to the transaction or arrangement, the content of the discussion, including any alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement, and a record of any votes taken in connection with the proceedings.

ARTICLE V - ANNUAL STATEMENTS
Each council member, principal officer and member of a committee with governing council delegated powers shall annually sign a statement which affirms such person:
a. Has received a copy of the conflicts of interest policy, b. Has read and understands the policy, and
c. Has agreed to comply with the policy
Disclosure and Signature Page follows

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I hereby state that I affirm that I have:
a. Received a copy of the conflicts of interest policy, b. Read and understand the policy,
c. Have agreed to comply with the policy, and
d. Understand the Organization is charitable and in order to maintain its federal tax exemption it must engage primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of its tax-exempt purposes.

I also hereby affirm that I understand that conflicts may need to be disclosed on a case-by-case basis. In these instances, I will alert the assigning party to the conflict immediately.

Print Name:

Signature:

Date: _____________________________

DISCLOSURES

NAME OF ORGANIZATION LEVEL OF INVOLVEMENT
(Council/Board Member, Volunteer, Staff Member, Consultant)

OTHER DISCLOSURES

CITY OF LOYALTON
RESOLUTION #8-2022
Adopting an Investment Policy
for the City of Loyalton
WHEREAS, the City Council may make modifications to the Investment Policy by majority vote and when so passed shall be deemed a part thereof; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has provided standards for governing bodies authorized to make investment decisions for local agencies, which are set forth in Sections 16429.1, 53600-53609 and 53630-53686 of the California Government Code (the “Investment Act”); and WHEREAS, the Investment Act allows local agencies to annually approve a statement of investment policy; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Loyalton has been presented with an investment policy (the “Investment Policy”) attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Council, with the aid of its staff, has reviewed the Investment Policy, which is designed to conform to the requirements of the Investment Act, and wishes to approve the Investment Policy and include it in the City of Loyalton Financial Policy.

WHEREAS, Section 53607 of the California Government Code authorizes the City to delegate investment authority to the Finance Committee.

WHEREAS, the City wishes to delegate its investment authority to the Finance Committee as permitted by Section 53607 of the California Government Code, and subject to the limitations contained in the Investment Policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Loyalton City Council of the City of Loyalton as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are found to be true and correct and incorporated as if fully set forth herein.

2. The Loyalton City Council hereby adopts the Investment Policy, a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference is incorporated herein.

3. The Loyalton City Council hereby delegates the Finance Committee the authority to invest or to reinvest funds of the City, or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, for a period of one year from the date of the adoption of this Ordinance. The Finance Committee shall assume full responsibility for those transactions until this delegation of authority is revoked by the rescission of this Ordinance or the expiration of this delegation. The Finance Personnel, at the direction of the Finance Committee, shall make a monthly report of those transactions to present to the City Council.

4. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Loyalton City Council of the City of Loyalton at a meeting duly called and held on the _____ day of ____________, 2022, by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
_______________________________
Sarah Jackson, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Kathy LeBlanc, City Clerk
City of Loyalton
Investment
Policy
[Ordinance No. ____, Adopted December ___, 2022]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1.1 Purpose

1.2 Investment Goal

1.3 Objective

2. AUTHORITY FOR INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS

2.1 Authority

2.2 Policy Review

2.3 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest

2.4 Liability Insurance

3. INVESTMENT GUIDELINES AND STRATEGY

3.1 Cash Availability

3.2 Internal Controls Over Investments

3.3 Authorized Financial Institutions and Dealers

3.4 Financial Instruments

4. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT

4.1 Authorized and Suitable Investments

4.2 Collateralization

4.3 Safekeeping and Custody

4.4 Diversification

4.5 Reporting

4.6 Prohibited Investments

5. EXPLANATION OF IINVESTMENT TYPES

5.1 State and Local Agencies

5.2 U.S. Treasuries

5.3 Specified Bank Obligations

5.4 Bankers’ Acceptance

5.5 Commercial Paper

5.6 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit

5.7 Repurchase Agreements

5.8 Medium Term Corporate or Bank Notes

5.9 Designated Mutual Funds

5.10 Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit (CD)

5.11 Mortgage Backed Securities

5.12 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
SECTION 1

PURPOSE AND SCOPE

1.1 Purpose

1.1.1 This Investment Policy is intended to outline the guidelines and practices to be used in effectively managing the available cash and investment portfolio of the City of Loyalton (“City”). It applies to all cash and investment assets of the City. City monies not required for immediate expenditure will may be invested in compliance with governing provisions of law, (Government Code Section 53600 et seq.) and this policy.

1.1.2 Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the proper management of public funds; not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by the investment officials shall be the “prudent investor” standard (Government Code Section 53600.3) and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio.

1.1.3 Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security’s credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.

1.1.4 Cash with Fiscal Agents are exempt from the provisions of the Government Code Section 53600 et seq. and are therefore not covered under this Investment Policy, but rather they are governed by the debt agreement associated with the bond proceeds.

1.1.5 Funds held in the City’s Pension Plan are not covered under this Policy.

1.2 Investment Goal

1.2.1 The ultimate investment goal of the Finance Committee is to enhance the City’s financial condition while ensuring the safety of it funds invested and that funds are readily available when needed.

1.2.2 In so doing the City will abide by Section 53600 et seq. of the Government Code, which establishes specific rules for investment of public funds by California public agencies.

1.3 Objective

1.3.1 The objective of this policy is to maximize return on investment of idle funds.

1.3.2 The Finance Committee will obtain the highest yield possible on City deposits consistent with the City’s policy of preserving principle and maintaining liquidity.

1.3.3 As specified in Government Code Section 53600.5, when investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling and managing public funds, the primary objectives, in priority order, of the investment activities shall be:

1.3.3.1 Safety:

Safety is the minimizing of risk associated with investing and refers to the attempt to reduce the potential for loss of principal, interest, or a combination of the two.

Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments of the City of Loyalton shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.

To attain this objective, diversification is required in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed the income generated from the remainder of the portfolio.

All City investments are controlled by the restrictions contained in Section 53601 of the Government Code. The First Level of risk control is to invest in instruments as described above that are the most credit worthy.

The Second Level of risk control is to invest in instruments that have maturities coinciding with dates of anticipated disbursements, thereby reducing the risk of loss of interest from an early disposition or withdrawal.

The Third Level of risk control is to invest in instruments that have the greatest potential for interest return, thereby avoiding the risk of lost earnings.

The City will only invest in those instruments that are considered very safe, in accordance with Government Code Section 53600 et. Seq.

1.3.3.2 Liquidity
Liquidity refers to “the ability to easily sell” at any time with a minimal risk of loss of principle or interest.

Liquidity is an important quality for City investments since cash flow can be unpredictable.

The investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements, which might be reasonably anticipated.

The City will attempt to maintain liquidity of investments in conjunction with safety and yield.

1.3.3.3 Return on Investment:

Yield or rate of return is the earnings an investment can provide.

The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout the budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio.

The City attempts to obtain the highest yield prudent when selecting an investment, provided that the criteria stated in this Policy for safety and liquidity are first met.

SECTION 2

AUTHORITY FOR INVESTMENT OF CITY FUNDS

2.1 Authority

2.1.1 Authority to manage the investment program is derived from California Government Code Section 53600 et. Seq. Management responsibility for the investment program resides with the Finance Committee.

2.1.2 No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Policy.

2.1.3 The Finance Committee shall be responsible for all the transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials.

Under the provisions of California Government Code Section 53600.3, the Finance Committee is a trustee and a fiduciary subject to the prudent investor standard.

2.1.4 All investment transactions or reporting conducted by the Finance Committee shall be reviewed by and approved by the City Council.

2.2 Policy Review

2.2.1 The Finance Committee shall review the Policy annually, for approval of the City Council.

2.3 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest

2.3.1 City officers and employees with delegated investment responsibility shall refrain from personal investment activities that could conflict with the proper execution of the investment program or impair their ability to make impartial decisions. Such activities include, but are not limited to:

2.3.1.1 Knowingly using the same broker who is managing City investments for personal investments.

2.3.1.2 Knowingly accepting gifts or entertainment from any broker who is managing City investments, or who has expressed a desire to manage City investments. The term “broker” here refers to an individual and not to a brokerage.

2.4 Liability Insurance

2.4.1 The City shall provide liability insurance for the protection of the Finance Committee and/or authorized individuals with fiduciary responsibility to the City’s investments.

SECTION 3

INVESTMENT GUIDELINES AND STRATEGY
The City Council hereby adopts the following investment guidelines and strategies for investment of City funds:

3.1 Cash Availability

3.1.1 Five-year cash flow analysis will be developed to serve as a basis for determining cash requirements and cash available for investment.

3.1.2 Where practical, cash receipts will be invested on a pooled basis with separate accounts for Water and Sewer.

3.1.3 All investment earnings (losses) will be allocated regularly based on cash balances of each such account.

3.2 Internal Controls Over Investments

3.2.1 The City shall develop an adequate system of internal investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of the investment functions in order to safeguard assets of the City. The Financial Committee will be responsible for maintaining adequate internal controls over investment funds.

3.2.2 The Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, will continually monitor investment advisors, brokers and financial institutions used by the City to ensure that they continue to provide expertise, safety of investments with maximum return on investment at a reasonable price.

3.2.3 The Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, will make every effort to enroll in continuing education programs to enhance knowledge and skills necessary to manage and oversee the City’s investments and its advisors.

3.2.4 The City will purchase financial instruments with idle funds and will periodically receive three (3) verbal quotes, except in cases where the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund is utilized.

3.2.5 The City may use the services of an investment advisor or broker; however, those advisors may at no time have autonomous control over City funds and those funds must be held by a third-party financial institution.

3.3 Authorized Financial Institutions and Dealers
Investment advisors, brokers and financial institutions will be subject to the following requirements:

3.3.1 Section 53601.5 of the California Government Code states that the purchase by a local agency of any investment authorized pursuant to Section 53601 or 53601.1, not purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the state as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the Corporations Code, or from a member of a federally regulated securities exchange, from a national or state-chartered bank, from a savings association or federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code) or from a brokerage firm designated as a primary government dealer by the Federal Reserve bank.

3.3.2 Before engaging in investment transactions with a broker/dealer, the Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, shall have received from said firm, a signed certification form. This form shall attest that the individual responsible for the City’s account with that firm has reviewed the City’s Investment Policy and that the firm understands the Policy and intends to present only those investment recommendations and transactions to the City that are appropriate under the terms and conditions of the Investment Policy.

3.3.3 The advisor, broker or institutions must have offices or branches in California.

3.3.4 The Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, will review the list of City financial advisors, brokers and financial institutions annually to ensure that they continue to be the highest caliber in advice, safety and reputation.

3.3.5 The City’s investments will be reviewed by the Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, on a monthly basis, and will report on a quarterly basis the results of the review to the Council.

3.4 Financial Instruments
The purchase of financial instruments will be made with the intent of holding the instruments to maturity unless market conditions dictate otherwise.

SECTION 4

AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT

4.1 Authorized and Suitable Investments

4.1.1 The City is empowered by California Government Code Section 53601 et. seq., which contains a detailed summary of the limitations and special conditions that apply to each of the allowed investment securities.

4.1.2 The Finance Committee, or the designee thereof, may only invest in financial instruments as described in the California Government Code Section 53601 and in accordance with specific guidelines, which set forth the authorized financial instruments.

4.1.3 The table on the following page compares California Government Code allowed investments with City Policy as to limits of maturity and percentage allocation of total portfolio. Section 5 of this Investment Policy explains in detail the definition of the Investment types, as well as the legal authority for each.

STATE CODE CITY POLICY
Gov. Code
Section Investment Type Max Maturity
Auth.

Limit (%)
Req’d
Rating
Max
Maturity
Auth.

Limit (%)
Req’d
Rating
35601 (a) Local Agency Bonds 5 yrs None None Not Allowed 53601 (b) US Treasury bills, Notes, or Bonds 5 yrs None None Not Allowed 53601 (c) State Registered Warrants, Notes or
Bonds of this state 5 yrs None None Not Allowed
53601 (d) State Registered Warrants, Notes,
or Bonds of the other 49 states None None N/A Not Allowed 53601 (e) Notes & Bonds of other local
California agencies 5 yrs None None Not Allowed
53601 (f) U.S. Agencies 5 yrs None None Not Allowed
53601 (g) Bankers Acceptance(1) 180 days 40% None Not Allowed 53601 (h) Prime Commercial Paper(2) 270 days 25% Al/pl Not Allowed 53601 (i) Negotiable Certificates of Deposit(3) 5 yrs 30% None 5 yrs 30% None 53601 (j) Repurchase Agreements* 1 yr None None Not Allowed 53601 (j)(4) Reverse Repurchase Agents 92 days 20% None Not Allowed 53601 (k) Medium Term Corporate Notes 5 yrs 30% A Not Allowed 53601 (l) Money Market Mutual Funds &
Mutual Funds*
5 yrs 20% 2-AAA 5 yrs 15% 2-AAA
53601 (n) Non-negotiable Certificates of
Deposit None None None None None None
53601 (o) Mortgage Pass-Through Securities 5 yrs 20% AA Not Allowed 16429.1 Local Agency Inv. Fund (LAIF) N/A None None N/A None None *See California Government Code Section 53601(j) for limits on the use of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements.
*Mutual Funds maturity may be defined as the weighted average maturity; money market mutual funds must have an average maturity of 90 days or less, per SEC regulations. (1) No more than 30% of surplus funds may be invested in Bankers Acceptances of any one commercial ban. (2) Commercial paper issuers must be organized and operating within U.S. and have total assets in excess of $500 million and have “A” or higher rating for issuer’s debt, other than commercial paper, by Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s. Purchases may not exceed 10% of outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. (3) Prohibited if the CDs are issued by a state or federal credit union if a member of the legislative body or any person with investment decision making authority also serves on the board of directors, or any committee appointed by the board of directors, or the credit union committee or the supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the negotiable CDs.

4.2 Reporting
In accordance with California Government Code Section 53646(b)(1), the Financial Personnel shall submit to each member of the City Council a quarterly investment report. The report shall include a complete description of the portfolio, the type of investments, the issuers, maturity dates, par values and the current market values of each component of the portfolio, including funds managed for the City by third party contracted managers. The report will also include the source of the portfolio valuation. As specified in the California Government Code Section 53646(e), if all funds are placed in LAIF, FDIC-Insured accounts and/or in a County investment pool, the foregoing report elements may be replaced by copies of the latest statements from such institutions. The report must also include a certification that all investment actions executed since the last report have been made in full compliance with the Investment Policy, and the City will meet its expenditure obligations for the next six months, as required by California Government Code Section 53646, subsections (b)(2) and (3) respectively. The Financial Personnel shall maintain a complete and timely record of all investment transactions.

4.3 Prohibited Investments
Under the provisions of California Government Code Sections 53601.6 and 53630, the City shall not invest any funds covered by this Investment Policy in inverse floaters, range notes, or mortgage-derived, interest-only strips.

SECTION 5

EXPLANATION OF INVESTMENT TYPES

5.1 State and Local Agencies
Definition: These are bonds, notes, warrants or other evidences of indebtedness of any local or State agency, including as City’s own bonds, within the State of California. This includes bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled or operated by the local or state agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency or State.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(a,c,d,e) of the California Government Code authorizes local and State agencies to purchase these bonds with no limitations as to the amount that can be owned.

5.2 U.S. Treasuries
Definition: These are instruments in which the full faith and credit of the United States Government is pledged. They are designated as Bills, Notes, or Bonds, depending on their maturity.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(b) of the Government Code authorizes local agencies to purchase U.S. Treasuries with no limitations as to the amount that can be owned of each.

5.3 Specified Bank Obligations
Definition: This category includes securities issued by federally owned or sponsored agencies that have the backing of the full faith and credit of the Federal Government. These securities are very liquid and marketable, and they offer a wide range of available maturities. Bank obligations in this category are limited to certain federally owned or sponsored agencies such as Banks for Cooperatives, Federal Land Banks, Feral Intermediate Credit Banks, and Federal Home Loan Banks. Also included are obligations, participations, or other instruments of, issued by, or fully guaranteed by the Federal National Mortgage Association, guaranteed portions of Small Business Administration notes, and obligations, participations, or other instruments of, or issued by, a Federal agency or a United States government-sponsored enterprise.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(f) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest in obligations issued by banks for these federally sponsored agencies.

5.4 Bankers’ Acceptance
Definition: A Bankers’ Acceptance (BA) is a time draft drawn on and accepted by a bank for payment of the shipment or storage of merchandise. The initial obligation of payment rests with the drawer, but the bank substitutes its credit standing for that of the borrower and assumes the obligation to pay face value at maturity.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(g) limits investments in this category to those Bankers’ Acceptances that are eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System and not exceeding 180 days’ maturity. In addition, no more than 40% of the City’s surplus funds may be invested in BA’s, and no more than 30% may be invested in any one bank.

5.5 Commercial Paper
Definition: Commercial paper consists of promissory notes of large business concerns of high credit standing, usually maturing in four to six months. These Corporate IOU’s are bought and sold in the open market. Large companies raise short-term capital needs with this type of instrument.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(H) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest in only “prime” quality Commercial Paper issued with the highest rating provided by Moody’s Investors’ Service, Inc. or Standard and Poor’s Corporation. Eligible paper is further limited to issuing corporations: (1) organized and operating within the United States, (2) having total assets in excess of $500 million dollars and (3) having an “A” or its equivalent or higher rating for the issuer’s debt, other than commercial paper, if any, as provided for by Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s. Commercial Paper may not exceed 270 days maturity and must not represent more than 10% of the outstanding paper of the issuing corporation. In addition, the amount invested in this type of instrument cannot exceed 25% of the total funds available to the City.

5.6 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit
Definition: A CD is a negotiable instrument evidencing a time deposit with a bank at a fixed rate of interest for a fixed period. CD’s of this type are not collateralized and should be considered an unsecured deposit.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(i) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest a maximum of 30% of surplus funds in the CD’s of State or Federal associations, credit unions or State licensed foreign banks. Section 53601(i) also stipulates that these investments are not allowed if anyone on the legislative body, its officers or staff with oversight or signing authority also serves on its board of directors or a committee of the credit union. Section 53638 stipulates that negotiable CD’s may not exceed the shareholder’s equity of the bank, and that the amount of CD’s purchased from a State or Federal association may not exceed the total of the net worth of that association unless the purchase amount is less than $500,000 and the deposits are insured or secured as required by law.

5.7 Repurchase Agreements
Definition: A Repurchased Agreement (Repo) involves tow simultaneous transactions. One transaction involves the sale of securities (collateral) by a borrower of funds, typically a bank or broker/dealer in governments or agencies, to a lender of funds. The lender can be any investor with cash to invest. The second transaction is the commitment by the borrower to repurchase the securities at the same price plus a predetermined amount of interest on an agreed future date.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(j) of the Government Code permits Repos in any security that is allowed for purchase as defined in that same section of the Code and for a term of one year or less. It also places restrictions on the transactions. The value of underlying securities must be at least 102% of the funds borrowed against those securities and transactions must be made only with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Subject to fluctuations in the market, if the value falls below 102%, the value must be brought back up by the next business day.

5.8 Medium Term Corporate or Bank Notes
Definition: A Medium Term Note is a promise to pay, issued by a corporation or a bank at a fixed interest rate for a fixed period of nine months to fifteen years. Most are unsecured, although some are collateralized or carry other credit enhancements such as letters of credit.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(k) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest a maximum of 30% of surplus funds in Medium Term Notes for a maximum maturity of five years. The notes must be issued by an U.S. Corporation or by a depository institution licensed by the United States or any State. To minimize risk, the notes must be rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service, like Moody’s Investors’ Service, Inc. or Standard and Poor’s Corporation.

5.9 Designated Mutual Funds
Definition: These are companies that are defined under IRS Code 26 U.S.C. 851, which are typically mutual funds that make diversified investments for their shareholders.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(l) of the Government Code authorizes investments in mutual funds as long as mutual companies are investing only in those securities and obligations otherwise authorized for direct investment by public agencies. Additionally, these companies must have attained the highest rating provided by at least two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services or have an investment advisor registered with the SEC with assets under management in excess of $500 million and with at least five (5) years’ experience investing in statutorily permitted securities. Investments in this category are also limited to 20% of total funds available, and no more than 10% of the funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund.

5.10 Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit (CD)
Definition: A Non-negotiable CD is an instrument evidencing a deposit with a financial institution for a fixed period of time and normally for a fixed rate of interest. They can be collateralized with securities or mortgages or, if issued in denominations of $100,000 or less, they can be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation if issued by a bank, or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation if issued by a savings and loan association.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(n) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest in Non-negotiable CD’s of banks or savings and loan associations with no limitations.

5.11 Mortgage Backed Securities
Definition: Mortgage Backed Securities are issued by U.S. Government agencies and are collateralized by home loans that create mortgage pools which are purchased and serve as payment pass-through obligations.

Legal Authority: Section 53601(o) of the Government Code allows public agencies to invest in mortgage pass-through and mortgage-backed securities rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. Purchases of these securities may not exceed 20% of the District’s surplus money that may be invested, and the term may not exceed five years.

5.12 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Definition: The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a special fund in the State of California Treasury created by law. The law permits local government agencies (cities, counties, and special districts) to pool idle monies in this fund and utilize the trained personnel in the State Treasurer’s Office for its investment.

Legal Authority: Section 16429.1 of the Government Code authorizes local agencies to invest though LAIF to maximum of Seventy-Five Million Dollars ($75,000,000) per agency.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 53601
53601. This section shall apply to a local agency that is a city, a district, or other local agency that does not pool money in deposits or investments with other local agencies, other than local agencies that have the same governing body. However, Section 53635 shall apply to all local agencies that pool money in deposits or investments with other local agencies that have separate governing bodies. The legislative body of a local agency having moneys in a sinking fund or moneys in its treasury not required for the immediate needs of the local agency may invest any portion of the moneys that it deems wise or expedient in those investments set forth below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities prescribed in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered, or nonregistered format, shall require delivery of the securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial advisers, consultants, or managers using the agency's funds, by book entry, physical delivery, or by third party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterparty bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery.

For purposes of this section, "counterparty" means the other party to the transaction. A counterparty bank's trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used for the physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular category of investment, that percentage is applicable only at the date of purchase.

Where this section does not specify a limitation on the term or remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no investment shall be made in any security, other than a security underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement authorized by this section, that at the time of the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five years, unless the legislative body Attachment D Page 1 of 8 has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body no less than three months prior to the investment:
(a) Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency. (b) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of indebtedness, or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest.
(c) Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenueproducing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the state. (d) Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.
(e) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebtedness of a local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
(f) Federal agency or United States government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. (g) Bankers' acceptances otherwise known as bills of exchange or time drafts that are drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank.

Purchases of bankers' acceptances shall not exceed 180 days' maturity or 40 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency's moneys may be invested in the bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section. This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district from investing moneys in its treasury in a manner authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Division 6 (commencing with Section 11501) of the Public Utilities Code). (h) Commercial paper of "prime" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO). The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either paragraph (1) or (2):
(1) The entity meets the following criteria:
(A) Is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation. (B) Has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (C) Has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rate "A" or higher by an NRSRO. (2) The entity meets the following criteria:
(A) Is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company. (B) Has program wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond. (C) Has commercial paper that is rated "A-1" or higher, or the equivalent, by an NRSRO. Eligible commercial paper shall have a maximum maturity of 270 days or less. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may invest no more than 25 percent of their moneys in eligible commercial paper. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Counties or a city and county may invest in commercial paper pursuant to the concentration limits in subdivision (a) of Section 53635.
(i) Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a federally licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank.

Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section, negotiable certificates of deposit do not come within Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630), except that the amount so invested shall be subject to the limitations of Section 53638. The legislative body of a local agency and the treasurer or other official of the local agency having legal custody of the moneys are prohibited from investing local agency funds, or funds in Attachment D

legislative body of the local agency, or a person with investment decision making authority in the administrative office manager's office, budget office, auditor-controller's office, or treasurer's office of the local agency also serves on the board of directors, or any committee appointed by the board of directors, or the credit committee or the supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the negotiable certificates of deposit.
(j) (1) Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements of securities authorized by this section, as long as the agreements are subject to this subdivision, including the delivery requirements specified in this section. (2) Investments in repurchase agreements may be made, on an investment authorized in this section, when the term of the agreement does not exceed one year. The market value of securities that underlie a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of the underlying securities is subject to daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase agreements shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is brought back up to 102 percent no later than the next business day. (3) Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may be utilized only when all of the following conditions are met:
(A) The security to be sold using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale.
(B) The total of all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements on investments owned by the local agency does not exceed 20 percent of the base value of the portfolio.
(C) The agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security.
(D) Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that obtained from selling a security to a counterparty using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. (4) (A) Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security may be made only upon prior approval of the governing body of the local agency and shall be made only with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or statechartered bank that has or has had a significant banking relationship with a local agency. (B) For purposes of this chapter, "significant banking relationship" means any of the following activities of a bank:
(i) Involvement in the creation, sale, purchase, or retirement of a local agency's bonds, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness. (ii) Financing of a local agency's activities.
(iii) Acceptance of a local agency's securities or funds as deposits. (5) (A) "Repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and for a specified amount and the counterparty will deliver the underlying securities to the local agency by book entry, physical delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book-entry account may be used for book-entry delivery. (B) "Securities," for purposes of repurchase under this subdivision, means securities of the same issuer, description, issue date, and maturity.

Attachment D Page 3 of 8
(C) "Reverse repurchase agreement" means a sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and includes other comparable agreements. (D) "Securities lending agreement" means an agreement under which a local agency agrees to transfer securities to a borrower who, in turn, agrees to provide collateral to the local agency. During the term of the agreement, both the securities and the collateral are held by a third party. At the conclusion of the agreement, the securities are transferred back to the local agency in return for the collateral. (E) For purposes of this section, the base value of the local agency's pool portfolio shall be that dollar amount obtained by totaling all cash balances placed in the pool by all pool participants, excluding any amounts obtained through selling securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or other similar borrowing methods. (F) For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference between the cost of funds obtained using the reverse repurchase agreement and the earnings obtained on the reinvestment of the funds. (k) Medium-term notes, defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated "A" or better by an NRSRO.

Purchases of medium-term notes shall not include other instruments authorized by this section and shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section.
(l) (1) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that invest in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k), inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (q), inclusive, and that comply with the investment restrictions of this article and Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630). However, notwithstanding these restrictions, a counterparty to a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement is not required to be a primary dealer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York if the company's board of directors finds that the counterparty presents a minimal risk of default, and the value of the securities underlying a repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement may be 100 percent of the sales price if the securities are marked to market daily. (2) Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 80a-1 et seq.). (3) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (1), the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(A) Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two NRSROs. (B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k), inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (q), inclusive, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (4) If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (2), the company shall have met either of the following criteria:
(A) Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two NRSROs. (B) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience managing money market mutual funds with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).
(5) The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased pursuant to this subdivision shall not include commission that the companies may charge and shall not exceed 20 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 10 percent of the agency's funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund pursuant to paragraph (1). (m) Moneys held by a trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment or security of bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease, installment sale, or other agreement of a local agency, or certificates of participation in those bonds, indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreements, Attachment D Page 4 of 8 may be invested in accordance with the statutory provisions governing the issuance of those bonds, indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreement, or to the extent not inconsistent therewith or if there are no specific statutory provisions, in accordance with the ordinance, resolution, indenture, or agreement of the local agency providing for the issuance. (n) Notes, bonds, or other obligations that are at all times secured by a valid first priority security interest in securities of the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities for the purpose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at least equal to that required by Section 53652 for the purpose of securing local agency deposits. The securities serving as collateral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or federal regulations applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest is granted. (o) A mortgage passthrough security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage-backed or other paythrough bond, equipment leasebacked certificate, consumer receivable passthrough certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond of a maximum of five years' maturity.

Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be issued by an issuer having an "A" or higher rating for the issuer's debt as provided by an NRSRO and rated in a rating category of "AA" or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision shall not exceed 20 percent of the agency's surplus moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. (p) Shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint powers authority organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 that invests in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (q), inclusive. Each share shall represent an equal proportional interest in the underlying pool of securities owned by the joint powers authority. To be eligible under this section, the joint powers authority issuing the shares shall have retained an investment adviser that meets all of the following criteria:
(1) The adviser is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission. (2) The adviser has not less than five years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (q), inclusive.
(3) The adviser has assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). (q) United States dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated "AA" or better by an NRSRO and shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section.

CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 16429.1
16429.1. (a) There is in trust in the custody of the Treasurer the Local Agency Investment Fund, which fund is hereby created. The Controller shall maintain a separate account for each governmental unit having deposits in this fund. (b) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, a local governmental official, with the consent of the governing body of that agency, having money in its treasury not required for immediate needs, may remit the money to the Treasurer for deposit in the Local Agency Investment Fund for the purpose of investment.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, an officer of any nonprofit corporation whose membership is confined to public agencies or public officials, or an officer of a qualified quasi-governmental agency, with the consent of the governing body of that agency, having money in its treasury not required for immediate needs, may remit the money to the Treasurer for deposit in the Local Agency Investment Fund for the purpose of investment.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law or of this section, a local agency, with the approval of its governing body, may deposit in the Local Agency Investment Fund proceeds of the issuance of bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other evidences of indebtedness of the agency pending expenditure of the proceeds for the authorized purpose of their issuance. In connection with these deposits of proceeds, the Local Agency Investment Fund is authorized to receive and disburse moneys, and to provide information, directly with or to an authorized officer of a trustee or fiscal agent engaged by the local agency, the Local Agency Investment Fund is authorized to hold investments in the name and for the account of that trustee or fiscal agent, and the Controller shall maintain a separate account for each deposit of proceeds. (e) The local governmental unit, the nonprofit corporation, or the quasi-governmental agency has the exclusive determination of the length of time its money will be on deposit with the Treasurer.
(f) The trustee or fiscal agent of the local governmental unit has the exclusive determination of the length of time proceeds from the issuance of bonds will be on deposit with the Treasurer.
(g) The Local Investment Advisory Board shall determine those quasi-governmental agencies which qualify to participate in the Local Agency Investment Fund.
(h) The Treasurer may refuse to accept deposits into the fund if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, the deposit would adversely affect the state's portfolio.
(i) The Treasurer may invest the money of the fund in securities prescribed in Section 16430. The Treasurer may elect to have the money of the fund invested through the Surplus Money Investment Fund as provided in Article 4 (commencing with Section 16470) of Chapter 3 of Part 2 of Division 4 of Title 2.
(j) Money in the fund shall be invested to achieve the objective of the fund which is to realize the maximum return consistent with safe and prudent treasury management.
(k) All instruments of title of all investments of the fund shall remain in the Treasurer's vault or be held in safekeeping under control of the Treasurer in any federal reserve bank, or any branch thereof, or the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, with any trust company, or the trust department of any state or national bank.
(l) Immediately at the conclusion of each calendar quarter, all interest earned and other increment derived from investments shall be distributed by the Controller to the contributing governmental units or trustees or fiscal agents, nonprofit corporations, and quasigovernmental agencies in amounts directly proportionate to the respective amounts deposited in the Local Agency Investment Fund and the length of time the amounts remained therein. An amount equal to the reasonable costs incurred in carrying out the provisions of this section, not to exceed a maximum of one-half of 1 percent of the earnings of this fund, shall be deducted from the earnings prior to distribution. The amount of this deduction shall be credited as reimbursements to the state agencies, including the Treasurer, the Controller, and the Department of Finance, having incurred costs in carrying out the provisions of this section. (m) The Treasurer shall prepare for distribution a monthly report of investments made during the preceding month. (n) As used in this section, "local agency," "local governmental unit," and "local governmental official" includes a campus or other unit and an official, respectively, of the California State University who deposits moneys in funds described in Sections 89721, 89722, and 89725 of the Education Code.