EXECUTIVEORDERS
a. Executive Order 11246 – Equal Employment Opportunity b. Executive Order 11990 – Protection of Wetlands
c. Executive Order 11998 – Flood Plain Management
d. Executive Order 12372 – Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs e. Executive Order 12699 – Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted New Building Construction
f. Executive Order 12898 – Environmental Justice
g. Executive Order 14005 – Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers.
FEDERALREGULATIONS
a. 2 CFR Part 180 – OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement).
b. 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.3, 4
c. 2 CFR Part 1200 – Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment. d. 28 CFR Part 35 – Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services.
e. 28 CFR § 50.3 – U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
f. 29 CFR Part 1 – Procedures for predetermination of wage rates.1 g. 29 CFR Part 3 – Contractors and subcontractors on public building or public work financed in whole or part by loans or grants from the United States.1 3-06-0144-033-2022
16 h. 29 CFR Part 5 – Labor standards provisions applicable to contracts covering Federally financed and assisted construction (also labor standards provisions applicable to non-construction contracts subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act).1 i. 41 CFR Part 60 – Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federal and Federally assisted contracting requirements).1 j. 49 CFR Part 20 – New restrictions on lobbying.
k. 49 CFR Part 21 – Nondiscrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. l. 49 CFR Part 23 – Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions. m. 49 CFR Part 26 – Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Program.
n. 49 CFR Part 27 – Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance.1 o. 49 CFR Part 28 – Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities conducted by the Department of Transportation. p. 49 CFR Part 30 – Denial of public works contracts to suppliers of goods and services of countries that deny procurement market access to U.S. contractors. q. 49 CFR Part 32 – Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance).
r. 49 CFR Part 37 – Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities(ADA). s. 49 CFR Part 41 – Seismic safety of Federal and Federally assisted or regulated new building construction.
FOOTNOTES TOAIRPORT RESCUE GRANT ASSURANCE B
1 These laws do not apply to airport planning sponsors. 2 These laws do not apply to private sponsors. 3 Cost principles established in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E must be used as guidelines for determining the eligibility of specific types of expenses. 4 Audit requirements established in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart F are the guidelines for audits.
SPECIFICASSURANCES
Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations, or circulars are incorporated by reference in this Grant Agreement.
1. Purpose Directly Related to the Airport
It certifies that the reimbursement sought is for a purpose directly related to the airport.
2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor.
a. Public Agency Sponsor:
It has legal authority to apply for this Grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed grant; that an official decision has been made by the applicant’s governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing 3-06-0144-033-2022
17 and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. b. Private Sponsor:
It has legal authority to apply for this Grant and to finance and carry out the proposed Grant and comply with all terms, conditions, and assurances of this Grant Agreement. It shall designate an official representative and shall in writing direct and authorize that person to file this application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein; to act in connection with this application; and to provide such additional information as may be required.
3. Good Title.
It, a public agency or the Federal government, holds good title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that good title will be acquired.
4. Preserving Rights and Powers.
a. It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this Grant Agreement without the written approval of the Secretary, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish, or modify any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary.
b. If the sponsor is a private sponsor, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will continue to function as a public-use airport in accordance with this Grant Agreement.
c. If an arrangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the sponsor or an employee of the sponsor, the sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to insure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance Title 49, United States Code, the regulations, and the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement.
5. Consistency with Local Plans.
Any project undertaken by this Grant Agreement is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of the Airport Rescue Grant application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport.
6. Consideration of Local Interest.
It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where any project undertaken by this Grant Agreement may be located.
7. Consultation with Users.
In making a decision to undertake any airport development project undertaken by this Grant Agreement, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport at which project is proposed.
3-06-0144-033-2022
18 8. Pavement Preventative Maintenance.
With respect to a project undertaken by this Grant Agreement for the replacement or reconstruction of pavement at the airport, it assures or certifies that it has implemented an effective airport pavement maintenance-management program and it assures that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed, or repaired with Federal financial assistance at the airport, including Airport Rescue Grant funds provided under this Grant Agreement. It will provide such reports on pavement condition and pavement management programs as the Secretary determines may be useful.
9. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements. a. It shall keep all Grant accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this Grant, the total cost of the Grant in connection with which this Grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the Grant supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the Grant. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. b. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this Grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a Grant or relating to the Grant in connection with which this Grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made.
10. Minimum Wage Rates.
It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for work on the airport funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be included in proposals or bids for the work.
11. Veteran's Preference.
It shall include in all contracts for work on any airport development project funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to Vietnam-era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns owned and controlled by disabled veterans as defined in Section 47112 of Title 49, United States Code. However, this preference shall apply only where the individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.
12. Operation and Maintenance.
a. The airport and all facilities which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, other than facilities owned or controlled by the United States, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable Federal, State and local agencies for maintenance and 3-06-0144-033-2022
19 operation. It will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. It will suitably operate and maintain the airport and all facilities thereon or connected therewith, with due regard to climatic and flood conditions. Any proposal to temporarily close the airport for non-aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Secretary. In furtherance of this assurance, the sponsor will have in effect arrangements for:
1. Operating the airport's aeronautical facilities whenever required;
2. Promptly marking and lighting hazards resulting from airport conditions, including temporary conditions; and
3. Promptly notifying airmen of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport.
Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when snow, flood or other climatic conditions interfere with such operation and maintenance. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the maintenance, repair, restoration, or replacement of any structure or facility which is substantially damaged or destroyed due to an act of God or other condition or circumstance beyond the control of the sponsor. b. It will suitably operate and maintain noise compatibility program items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have been expended.
13. Hazard Removal and Mitigation.
It will take appropriate action to assure that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards.
14. Compatible Land Use.
It will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft.
15. Exclusive Rights.
The sponsor shall not grant an exclusive right to use an air navigation facility on which this Grant has been expended. However, providing services at an airport by only one fixed-based operator is not an exclusive right if—
a. it is unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one fixed-based operator to provide the services; and
b. allowing more than one fixed-based operator to provide the services requires a reduction in space leased under an agreement existing on September 3, 1982, between the operator and the airport.
16. Airport Revenues.
a. This Grant shall be available for any purpose for which airport revenues may lawfully be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. Funds provided under this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement will only be expended for the capital or operating costs of the airport; the local airport system; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport(s) subject to this agreement and all applicable addendums for costs 3-06-0144-033-2022
20 related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, combating the spread of pathogens at the airport, and debt service payments as prescribed in the Act. b. For airport development, 49 U.S.C. § 47133 applies.
17. Reports and Inspections.
It will:
a. submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request and make such reports available to the public; make available to the public at reasonable times and places a report of the airport budget in a format prescribed by the Secretary;
b. in a format and time prescribed by the Secretary, provide to the Secretary and make available to the public following each of its fiscal years, an annual report listing in detail:
1. all amounts paid by the airport to any other unit of government and the purposes for which each such payment was made; and
2. all services and property provided by the airport to other units of government and the amount of compensation received for provision of each such service and property.
18. Land for Federal Facilities.
It will furnish without cost to the Federal Government for use in connection with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or weather-reporting and communication activities related to air traffic control, any areas of land or water, or estate therein, or rights in buildings of the sponsor as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for construction, operation, and maintenance at Federal expense of space or facilities for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereof will be made available as provided herein within four months after receipt of a written request from the Secretary.
19. Airport Layout Plan.
a. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will keep up to date at all times an airport layout plan of the airportshowing:
1. boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the sponsor for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto;
2. the location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities;
3. the location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas and of all existing improvements thereon; and
4. all proposed and existing access points used to taxi aircraft across the airport’s property boundary. Such airport layout plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evidenced by the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Secretary on the face of the airport layout plan. The sponsor will not make or permit any changes or alterations in the airport or any of its facilities which are not in conformity with the airport layoutplan 3-06-0144-033-2022
21 as approved by the Secretary and which might, in the opinion of the Secretary, adversely affect the safety, utility or efficiency of the airport. b. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, if a change or alteration in the airport or the facilities is made which the Secretary determines adversely affects the safety, utility, or efficiency of any federally owned, leased, or funded property on or off the airport and which is not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary, the owner or operator will, if requested, by the Secretary (1) eliminate such adverse effect in a manner approved by the Secretary; or (2) bear all costs of relocating such property (or replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to the Secretary and all costs of restoring such property (or replacement thereof) to the level of safety, utility, efficiency, and cost of operation existing before the unapproved change in the airport or its facilities except in the case of a relocation or replacement of an existing airport facility due to a change in the Secretary’s design standards beyond the control of the airportsponsor.
20. Civil Rights.
It will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in any activity conducted with, or benefiting from, funds received from this Grant. a. Using the definitions of activity, facility, and program as found and defined in §§ 21.23 (b)and
21.23 (e) of 49 CFR Part 21, the sponsor will facilitate all programs, operate all facilities, or conduct all programs in compliance with all non-discrimination requirements imposed by or pursuant to these assurances.
b. Applicability
1. Programs and Activities. If the sponsor has received a grant (or other Federal assistance) for any of the sponsor’s program or activities, these requirements extend to all of the sponsor’s programs and activities.
2. Facilities. Where it receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance to construct, expand, renovate, remodel, alter, or acquire a facility, or part of a facility, the assurance extends to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.
3. Real Property. Where the sponsor receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property. c. Duration
The sponsor agrees that it is obligated to this assurance for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
1. So long as the airport is used as an airport, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
2. So long as the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property. d. Required Solicitation Language
3-06-0144-033-2022
22 It will include the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests for Proposals for work, or material under this Grant and in all proposals for agreements, including airport concessions, regardless of funding source:
“The City of Madera, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises and airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”
e. Required Contract Provisions.
1. It will insert the non-discrimination contract clauses requiring compliance with the acts and regulations relative to non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT, and incorporating the acts and regulations into the contracts by reference in every contract or agreement subject to the non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT Acts and regulations.
2. It will include a list of the pertinent non-discrimination authorities in every contract that is subject to the non-discrimination acts and regulations.
3. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a sponsor.
4. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, age, or handicap as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, license, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the sponsor with other parties:
A. For the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, grant, or program; and
B. For the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, grant, or program.
C. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the acts, the regulations, and this assurance.
D. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the acts, the regulations, and this assurance.
21. Foreign Market Restrictions.
It will not allow funds provided under this Grant to be used to fund any activity that uses any product or service of a foreign country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction. 3-06-0144-033-2022
23 22. Policies, Standards and Specifications.
It will carry out any project funded under an Airport Rescue Grant in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary including, but not limited to, current FAA Advisory Circulars for AIP projects, as of June 25, 2021.
23. Access By Intercity Buses.
The airport owner or operator will permit, to the maximum extent practicable, intercity buses or other modes of transportation to have access to the airport; however, it has no obligation to fund special facilities for intercity buses or for other modes of transportation.
24. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises.
The sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26, or in the award and performance of any concession activity contract covered by 49 CFR Part 23. In addition, the sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the administration of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concessions Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) programs or the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26. The sponsor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts, and/or concession contracts. The sponsor’s DBE and ACDBE programs, as required by 49 CFR Parts 26 and 23, and as approved by DOT, are incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of these programs is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the sponsor of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Parts 26 and 23 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1936 (31 U.S.C. 3801).
25. Acquisition Thresholds.
The FAA deems equipment to mean tangible personal property having a useful life greater than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost equal to or greater than $5,000. Procurements by micropurchase means the acquisition of goods or services for which the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000, unless authorized in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.320. Procurement by small purchase procedures means those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing goods or services that do not exceed the $250,000 threshold for simplified acquisitions. 3-06-0144-033-2022
24 Current FAA Advisory Circulars Required for Use in AIP Funded and PFC Approved Projects
View the most current Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects at http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory_circulars and http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
_________________________________ Agenda Number: ___________ Keith Helmuth, Department Director
_________________________________
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Amendment to the Application for Transportation Development Act (TDA) – Local Transportation Funds (LTF) and State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Amendment to the Applications for TDA – LTF and STA Funds for FY 2021/22 and Authorizing the City Engineer to execute and submit the Applications to the Madera County Transportation Commission (MCTC)
SUMMARY:
Annually, the local agencies are required to submit applications for LTF and STA funds for approval by the MCTC. The applications outline the intended use of available funds. On June 2, 2021, the City Council (Council) approved LTF and STA applications for the projected available funds for FY 2021/22.
Upon the adoption of the state budget, the City’s STA application must be amended to reflect any changes. This Fiscal Year an amended application must be filed to show an increase in STA funds and to reflect carryover balances of unexpended funds from FY 2020/21.
DISCUSSION:
At the June 2, 2021, meeting, Council approved the FY 2021/22 LTF & STA Applications for the FY 2021/22 funding allocated by MCTC. LTF funds must be used for transportation related services such as transit services, street construction, program planning, and administration. Projects in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the City have been created and approved by Council for the use of these funds. STA funds must be used for transit related programs only. Therefore, the funds are programmed for operations of the Madera Metro Transit System. ~~ B-8
~ 12.,;l,<,'rrr
On September 22, 2021, the MCTC approved Resolution 21-08 which increased the STA funds available for FY 2021/22. This increase potentially relieves an equivalent amount from LTF funds for use on other eligible expenses, such as street projects.
The amendment to the LTF application is prepared and submitted to MCTC annually after the prior year’s final expenses and claims have been processed, and the excess prior year funds and carryover balances have been confirmed by MCTC. The carryover amounts for this year are shown below in Table 1. The carryover amounts are included in the current CIP.
A summary of all changes is summarized in the table below.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
For this cycle and near term, the next several cycles, there are no identified impacts to the General Fund.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
Managed Growth: Strategy 101.6 – Ensure infrastructure can sustain population growth in the development of the General Plan.
Multi-modal Transportation: Strategy 121 – Develop a City-wide multi-modal transportation plan to ensure safe, affordable, and convenient transportation modes for residents and businesses within Madera.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council may provide staff direction on how to amend the TDA application or may refer the item back to staff for additional information.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
Exhibit A – Applications
Table 1: Changes to LTF & STA Applications for FY 2021/22 Application Item
Original
Application
Amount
Carryover New FY 21/22
Allocation
Amended
Application
Amount
LTF $1,902,849 3,538,269.48 $5,441,118.48
STA $464,103 $106,853 $570,956
Total Application $2,366,952 $6,012,074.48
Attachment 1
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 22-_______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) – LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
FUNDS (LTF) AND STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE (STA) FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2021/22 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE
AND SUBMIT THE APPLICATIONS TO MADERA COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (MCTC)
WHEREAS, the TDA - LTF and STA funds are annually allocated by MCTC pursuant to the TDA; and
WHEREAS, the City of Madera prepares the applications outlining the intended uses for the LTF and STA funds each year and the applications may be amended as needed; and WHEREAS, The Madera County Transportation has increased the City allocation of State Transportation Assistance Funds by $106,853; and
WHEREAS, the unexpended balance of LTF funds in FY 2020/2021 must be added to the FY 2021/22 amended application for proper accounting purposes; and WHEREAS, the LTF and STA fund amended applications for FY 2021/22 that describe the intended uses of these funds have been submitted to Council for review and approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA hereby resolves, finds, determines and orders as follows:
1. The above recitals are true and correct.
2. The City Council of the City of Madera approves the Amended Applications for FY 2021/22, copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
3. The applications are hereby approved.
4. The City Engineer is authorized to execute the amended applications and submit to MCTC.
5. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. * * * * * * * *
Exhibit A
Applications
Agency: Date: 12/21/2022
Fiscal Year: 2021/22
Amending:
Type of
Amendment:
Project Approved Allocation New Proposed Allocation Difference 1 Madera Metro, Intermodal $683,856.00 $683,856.00 $0.00 2 Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects $38,057.00 $103,913.73 $65,856.73 3 MCTC Planning Services $57,085.00 $57,085.00 $0.00
4 Local Agency Planning (match to
STP Grant, Transit) $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00
5 Street & Road Projects $1,023,851.00 $4,496,263.75 $3,472,412.75 6 $0.00
7 $0.00
8 $0.00
9 $0.00
10 $0.00
Total $1,902,849.00 $5,441,118.48 $3,538,269.48
Notes
Agency Authorizing Signature Date
MCTC Authorizing Signature Date
MCTC Use:
Month Amendment No.
Madera County Transportation Commission
TDA Amendment Request
City of Madera
Amendment reallocates funds carried over from FY 2020-21. This is consisted with FY 21/22 Budget and Capital Improvement Program
LTF STA
Carryover of PY Funds Reassign funds Other
El □
El □ □
Agency: Date: 12/21/2022
Fiscal Year: 2021/22
Amending:
Type of
Amendment:
Project Approved Allocation New Proposed Allocation Difference 1 Madera Metro, Dial-A-Ride,
Intermodal $464,103.00 $570,956.00 $106,853.00
2 $0.00
3 $0.00
4 $0.00
5 $0.00
6 $0.00
7 $0.00
8 $0.00
9 $0.00
10 $0.00
Total $464,103.00 $570,956.00 $106,853.00
Notes
Agency Authorizing Signature Date
MCTC Authorizing Signature Date
MCTC Use:
Month Amendment No.
Madera County Transportation Commission
TDA Amendment Request
City of Madera
New Allocation is per MCTC Resolution 21-08
LTF STA
Carryover of PY Funds Reassign funds Other
□ 0
□ □
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
Agenda Number:
Keith Helmuth, Department Director
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Granada Drive RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Minute Order Approving:
1. Acceptance of Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Granada Drive, City Project No. TS-17 (“Project”)
2. The Recording of Notice of Completion
3. The release of retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion SUMMARY:
The City Council (Council), at its May 20, 2020 meeting, awarded a contract to Bush Engineering Inc. for the Project in the amount of $499,775.00. The Contractor has completed the project in accordance with the plans and specifications and as modified by approved Change Orders.
BACKGROUND:
A final project inspection was conducted by the Engineering Department. Public Works Departmentstaff also participated in the final inspection of the project. All parties agree that the project can be recommended for acceptance by the Council and a “Notice of Completion” recorded. The Notice of Completion is provided in Attachment 1. The work in general consisted of Construction of Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Granada Drive. A location map of said improvements is provided in Attachment 2.
While the project was completed within budget, six Change Orders, totaling approximately $49,600, were processed. Table 1 identifies the cost of the project while Change Orders are summarized in Table 2.
B-9
Table 1: Project Summary
Original Contract Amount Total Change Orders Total Construction Contract Cost $499,775.00 $49,626.96 $549,401.96
Table 2: Summary of Change Orders
Change Order Description
Trenching and Slurry Additional work to protect an AT&T line and water and sewer mains crossed by new drain line being installed
Additional Asphalt Paving Paved area repaired alteration due to additional work for new drain line
Traffic Control for
Unforeseen Conditions
Cost for maintaining traffic control for northwest corner while solution was developed due to unforeseen
conditions between October 9 through 25, 2021
Three Poles changed Poles change to allow smaller foundations to clear. AT&T lines found in conflict with larger foundations for poles originally specified
Traffic Signal Timing Additional cost incurred due to passing of consultant that provided service at a nominal cost for City Traffic Signals The total cost of the Change Orders increased the cost of the project approximately 10 percent, within the allowable contract contingencies. The construction project was completed within the adjusted contract time and available budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund given that funding for the project was Measure T – RTP/3R Compliance and Traffic Signal Impact Fee funds.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
Strategy 101.6: Ensure infrastructure can sustain population growth in the development of the General Plan.
Strategy 121 - Develop a city-wide multi-modal transportation plan to ensure safe, affordable and convenient transportation modes for residents and businesses within Madera.
ALTERNATIVES:
As an alternative, the Council may elect to reject the Notice of Completion of the Project.
Rejection of the Notice of Completion will result in staff’s inability to release retention funds and closing the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Location Map
3. Project Photo
ATTACHMENT 1
Notice of Completion
Recording Requested by:
City of Madera
And When Recorded, Mail to:
City of Madera – City Clerk
205 W. 4th Street
Madera, CA 93637
_________________________________________ Space above this line for Recorder’s Use ______________________________________ Fee Waived per Section 27383 & 27388.1(a)(2)(D) of the Government Code – No Document Tax Due $ -0-
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is City of Madera.
3. The full address of the undersigned is 205 W. 4th Street, Madera, CA 93637.
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee ____________________________________________ (If other than fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase” or “lessee”.)
5. The full name and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenant or as tenants in common are:
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on
7. The name of the original contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was:
(If no contractor for work of improvements as a whole, insert “none”.)
8. The full name(s) and address(es) of the transferor(s) of the undersigned is(are):
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Madera, County of Madera, State of California, and is described as follows:
10. The street address of said property is
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”.) (Signature of Owner named in Paragraph 2)
Dated Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
________________________________________________
State of California
County of Madera
Keith Brent Helmuth, being duly sworn says: He is the City Engineer of the City of Madera, the corporation that executed the foregoing notice as owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property therein described; that he makes this verification on behalf of said corporation; that he has read said notice and knows the contents thereof, and that the facts herein stated are true. (Signature of Officer)
_______________________________________________________ Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
State of California
County of Madera
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on the ___________ day of _____________________, 2021 by Keith Brent Helmuth, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
______________________________________________________ (Seal) Alicia Gonzales
City Clerk
The notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ATTACHMENT 2
Location Map
ATTACHMENT 3
Project Photo
Figure 1 – Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Granada Drive
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
Agenda Number: B-10
Keith Helmuth, Department Director
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Westberry Boulevard RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Minute Order Approving:
1. Acceptance of Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Westberry Boulevard, City Project No. TS-19 (“Project”)
2. The Recording of Notice of Completion
3. The release of retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion SUMMARY:
The City Council (Council), at its May 20, 2020 meeting, awarded a contract to Avison Construction, Inc. for the installation of a new traffic signal in the amount of $503,385. The Contractor has completed the project in accordance with the plans and specifications and as modified by approved Change Orders.
BACKGROUND:
A final project inspection was conducted by the Engineering Department. Public Works Department staff also participated in the final inspection of the project. All parties agree that the Project can be recommended for acceptance by the Council and a “Notice of Completion” recorded. The Notice of Completion is provided in Attachment 1. The work in general consisted of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Westberry Boulevard. A map of said improvements is provided in Attachment 2.
It is noted that two Change Orders, totaling approximately $26,000 were processed. They consisted of additional asphalt concrete improvements to match existing conditions and controller programing for the traffic signal.
The final progress payment, less the retention amount of five percent, has been processed. Table 1 provides a summary of contract costs.
Table 1: Project Summary
Original Contract Amount Total Change Orders Total Construction Contract Cost $503,385.00 $25,948.33 $529,333.33
The total cost of the Change Orders increased the cost of the project approximately 5 percent, wherein a contingency of up to 10 percent of the original contract amount was included. The construction project was completed within the adjusted contract time and available budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund given that funding for the project was from Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ), Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Development Impact Fee Funds (DIF) and Measure T – RTP/3R.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
Strategy 101.6: Ensure infrastructure can sustain population growth in the development of the General Plan.
Strategy 121 - Develop a city-wide multi-modal transportation plan to ensure safe, affordable and convenient transportation modes for residents and businesses within Madera.
ALTERNATIVES:
As an alternative, the Council may elect to reject the Notice of Completion of the Project.
Rejection of the Notice of Completion will result in staff’s inability to release retention funds and closing the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Location Map
3. Project Photo
ATTACHMENT 1
Notice of Completion
Recording Requested by:
City of Madera
And When Recorded, Mail to:
City of Madera – City Clerk
205 W. 4th Street
Madera, CA 93637
_________________________________________ Space above this line for Recorder’s Use ______________________________________ Fee Waived per Section 27383 & 27388.1(a)(2)(D) of the Government Code – No Document Tax Due $ -0-
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is City of Madera.
3. The full address of the undersigned is 205 W. 4th Street, Madera, CA 93637.
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee ____________________________________________ (If other than fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase” or “lessee”.)
5. The full name and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenant or as tenants in common are:
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on
7. The name of the original contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was:
(If no contractor for work of improvements as a whole, insert “none”.)
8. The full name(s) and address(es) of the transferor(s) of the undersigned is(are):
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Madera, County of Madera, State of California, and is described as follows:
10. The street address of said property is
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”.) (Signature of Owner named in Paragraph 2)
Dated Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
________________________________________________
State of California
County of Madera
Keith Brent Helmuth, being duly sworn says: He is the City Engineer of the City of Madera, the corporation that executed the foregoing notice as owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property therein described; that he makes this verification on behalf of said corporation; that he has read said notice and knows the contents thereof, and that the facts herein stated are true. (Signature of Officer)
_______________________________________________________ Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
State of California
County of Madera
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on the ___________ day of _____________________, 2021 by Keith Brent Helmuth, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
______________________________________________________ (Seal) Alicia Gonzales
City Clerk
The notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ATTACHMENT 2
Location Map
ATTACHMENT 3
Project Photo
Figure 1 – Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Howard Road and Westberry Boulevard
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
Agenda Number:
Keith Helmuth, Department Director
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at the Intersection of Stadium Road and Gary Lane, CDBG No.
B18MC060053, City Project No. TS-29
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Minute Order Approving:
1. Acceptance of Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at the Intersection of Stadium Road and Gary Lane, CDBG No. B18MC060053, City Project No. TS-29 (“Project”)
2. The Recording of Notice of Completion.
3. The release of retention 35 days after recording of the Notice of Completion SUMMARY:
The City Council (Council), at its February 17, 2021 meeting, awarded a contract to Witbro, Inc. dba Seal Rite Paving and Grading for the Project in the amount of $200,339. The Contractor has completed the project in accordance with the plans and specifications and as modified by an approved change order.
BACKGROUND:
A final project inspection was conducted by the Engineering Department. Public Works Departmentstaff also participated in the final inspection of the project. All parties agree that the project can be recommended for acceptance by the Council and a “Notice of Completion” recorded. The Notice of Completion is provided in Attachment 1. The work in general consisted of curb ramp improvements and a new pedestrian hybrid beacon including appurtenant equipment, electrical system, pedestrian facilities, concrete improvements, and minor asphalt concrete paving for the intersection of Stadium Road and Gary Lane. A map of said improvements is provided in Attachment 2.
B-11
One Change Order was processed. The change order consisted of minor additional work needed for the sidewalk improvements to match existing conditions.
The final progress payment, less the retention amount of five percent, has been processed. See Table 1 for a summary of contract costs.
Table 1: Project Summary
Original Contract Amount Total Change Orders Total Construction Contract Cost $200,339.00 $1,658.31 $201,997.31
The total cost of the Change Orders increased the cost of the project approximately 0.8 percent, wherein a contingency of up to 15 percent of the original contract amount was included. The construction project was completed within the adjusted contract time and available budget.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund given that funding sources for the project were Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Local Transportation Funds (LTF).
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
Strategy 101.6: Ensure infrastructure can sustain population growth in the development of the General Plan.
Strategy 121 - Develop a city-wide multi-modal transportation plan to ensure safe, affordable and convenient transportation modes for residents and businesses within Madera.
ALTERNATIVES:
As an alternative, the Council may elect to reject the Notice of Completion of the Project.
Rejection of the Notice of Completion will result in staff’s inability to release retention funds and closing the Project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Notice of Completion
2. Location Map
3. Project Photo
ATTACHMENT 1
Notice of Completion
Recording Requested by:
City of Madera
And When Recorded, Mail to:
City of Madera – City Clerk
205 W. 4th Street
Madera, CA 93637
_________________________________________ Space above this line for Recorder’s Use ______________________________________ Fee Waived per Section 27383 & 27388.1(a)(2)(D) of the Government Code – No Document Tax Due $ -0-
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT:
1. The undersigned is owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is City of Madera.
3. The full address of the undersigned is 205 W. 4th Street, Madera, CA 93637.
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: In fee ____________________________________________ (If other than fee, strike “In fee” and insert, for example, “purchaser under contract of purchase” or “lessee”.)
5. The full name and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold title with the undersigned as joint tenant or as tenants in common are:
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
6. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on
7. The name of the original contractor, if any, for such work of improvement was:
(If no contractor for work of improvements as a whole, insert “none”.)
8. The full name(s) and address(es) of the transferor(s) of the undersigned is(are):
Name Address
______________________________________ ___________________________________________
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Madera, County of Madera, State of California, and is described as follows:
10. The street address of said property is
(If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “none”.) (Signature of Owner named in Paragraph 2)
Dated Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
________________________________________________
State of California
County of Madera
Keith Brent Helmuth, being duly sworn says: He is the City Engineer of the City of Madera, the corporation that executed the foregoing notice as owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property therein described; that he makes this verification on behalf of said corporation; that he has read said notice and knows the contents thereof, and that the facts herein stated are true. (Signature of Officer)
_______________________________________________________ Keith Brent Helmuth, P.E.
City Engineer
State of California
County of Madera
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on the ___________ day of _____________________, 2021 by Keith Brent Helmuth, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
______________________________________________________ (Seal) Alicia Gonzales
City Clerk
The notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.
ATTACHMENT 2
Location Map
LOCATION MAP
• :ti
r
L ...... -...-
LEGEND N ~■--■: PROPOSED NEW PEDESTRIAN
HYBRID BEACON
ATTACHMENT 3
Project Photo
Figure 1 – Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at the Intersection of Stadium Road and Gary Lane
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
Agenda Number: ___________
______________________________
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Clean California Local Grant Program Funds – Fresno River Project RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution Authorizing Submission of the Clean California Local Grant Program Funds application for the Fresno River Project
SUMMARY:
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) developed the Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) as part of a two-year program through which approximately $296 million in funds will go to local communities to beautify and improve local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, and transit centers to clean and enhance public spaces. Through the combination of adding beautification measures and art in public spaces along with the removal of litter and debris, this effort will enhance communities and improve spaces for walking and recreation.
The application is due February 1, 2022.
DISCUSSION:
The Clean CA Local Grant Program is intended to achieve the following:
Reduce the amount of waste and debris within public rights-of-way, pathways, parks, transit centers, and other public spaces.
Enhance, rehabilitate, restore, or install measures to beautify and improve public spaces and mitigate the urban heat island effect.
Enhance public health, cultural connection, and community placemaking by improving public spaces for walking and recreation.
Advance equity for underserved communities.
B-12
As part of the effort, Caltrans developed project selection criteria that incorporates:
Need for the project
Potential to enhance and beautify public space
Potential for greening to provide shade, reduce the urban heat island effect, and utilize native low-water plants
Potential for abatement of litter and debris that improves access to use of public space Local public engagement process that culminated in the project proposal and reflects community priorities
Benefit to underserved communities
The City intends to submit an application specific to the Fresno River. The project application plans to address the increase in refuse in the Fresno River and immediate surrounding areas over the last years. The application plans to augment the work already being done by the City under the riverbed cleanup pilot program, as well as add beautification projects and an educational component as part of the maintenance aspect. The application plans to include:
Request for funds to complete riverbed cleanup to reduce the amount of waste and debris within public rights-of-way, pathways, and the general public spaces within the proximity of the riverbed.
Request for funds to install solar lighting along riverbed pathway trails. Request for funds to install trash receptors throughout the riverbed, while adding an educational component for the public.
Request for pilot-program stipend-program that would entice community agencies to adopt areas of the riverbed for cleanup. This will help add an ownership component, continued community engagement, and community collaboration. Request for funds for rehab of existing pathways in need of slurry seal, to beautify and improve the space.
Request to add exercise equipment along the river.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Staff is currently working with a grant consultant to assist with the submission of this application.
Townsend Public Affairs, Inc. has been issued a purchase order for the full completion and submission of the application for the lump sum of $7,500. The costs associated with the grant consultant will be expended from adopted Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget; there will be no additional General Fund impact.
Additionally, recognizing the diverse funding needs and abilities of local agencies across the state, the Clean California Local Grant Program guidelines are developed with a framework that does not apply a one-size fits all approach. The local match component will range from 0% to 50% of the project costs and will be based on the capacity of the community to leverage local capital.
Additionally, with an eye on equity, half of the overall program funds will benefit or be located in underserved communities. The maximum project amount is $5 million.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
The recommended actions support the following Vision Madera 2025 strategies:
Strategy 412: Develop the Fresno River into a major water feature and lake, providing seasonal recreation, entertainment opportunities and water storage.
Strategy 131: Establish and enforce visual standards for neighborhoods and businesses in Madera including design review and code enforcement.
Strategy 132: Connect Madera's neighborhoods through streets, trails and walkways that promote community.
Strategy 401: Develop and promote Madera as a walkable community with an emphasis on improving the quality of the natural resources.
ALTERNATIVES:
Council may elect to not approve the Resolution for the CCLGP submission for the project at the Fresno River.
Failure to approve application submission will result in the City forfeiting this grant opportunity as grant is due February 1, 2022.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution – Approving Application for Fresno River Project RESOLUTION NO. ___
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE APPLICATION(S) FOR CLEAN CALIFORNIA
LOCAL GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) developed the Clean California Local Grant Program as part of a two-year program through which approximately $296 million in funds will go to local communities to beautify and improve local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, and transit centers to clean and enhance public spaces; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) require submission of application should include signature of an authorized Chief Executive Officer, Public Works Director, or other officer authorized by the governing board; and WHEREAS, the undersigned affirms that their agency will be the “Implementing Agency” for the project if funded with CCLGP funds and they are the Chief Executive Officer, Public Works Director or other officer authorized by their governing board with the authority to commit the agency’s resources and funds. They are also affirming that the statements contained in this application package are true and complete to the best of their knowledge. For infrastructure projects, the undersigned affirms that they are the manager of the public right-of-way facilities (responsible for their maintenance and operation) or they have authority over this position; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Madera hereby:
APPROVES THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE FRESNO RIVER PROJECT; AND
1. Certifies that the Applicant has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the general provisions contained in the Program Guidelines; and
2. Delegates the authority to the City Manager to conduct all negotiations, sign and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the Grant Scope; and
3. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and guidelines.
*******
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
_________________________________ Agenda Number: ___________ Gary Conte, Planning Manager
_________________________________
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Public Hearing regarding Annexation No. 10 (Omni Subdivision) into Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 and Related Actions
RECOMMENDATIONS:
First, it is recommended that the Council hold the public hearing and, after its close, adopt the following resolutions:
1. A Resolution of the City Council (Council) of the City of Madera, California, Authorizing the Annexation of Territory to Community Facilities District No. (CFD) 2005-1 (Annexation No. 10) and Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax and Submitting the Levy of Tax to the Qualified Electors.
2. A Resolution of the Council of the City, Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Voters of Annexation No. 10 of the City’s CFD 2005-1 Propositions Regarding the Annual Levy of Special Taxes within Annexation No. 10 to Finance Police Protection Services, Fire Protection and Suppression Services, Park Maintenance, and Storm Drainage System Operation and Maintenance Within the District.
Second, it is recommended Council conduct A Special Election of the Qualified Electors of Annexation No. 10 of the City’s CFD 2005-1 and Declaration and Certification of the Results Thereof.
Third, it is recommended that Council adopt A Resolution of the Council of the City, Making Certain Findings, Certifying the Results of an Election and Adding the Territory Identified as Annexation No. 10 to CFD 2005-1.
SUMMARY:
At the Council’s December 1, 2021 meeting, the Council approved a resolution adopting a boundary map depicting the territory proposed for annexation and approved a resolution declaring the City’s intention to annex the proposed territory into CFD 2005-1. At tonight’s meeting, after the close of the public hearing and adoption of the first two above-referenced resolutions, if the landowner elects to annex at the special election, the City can proceed with the annexation by adopting a resolution of annexation.
C-1
DISCUSSION:
On November 16, 2005, by Resolution No. 05-334, the City Council established CFD 2005-1, a Mello Roos Community Facilities District with the intention that future development within the City of Madera (the "City") would annex into this district. The special taxes collected from the property owners within the district are used for the funding of police and fire protection services, storm drain infrastructure maintenance and operations, and park maintenance. Property owner assessments are paid as a component of the property tax collection process. As was originally envisioned with the establishment of the CFD, future residential projects not included in the initial formation process are required to go through an annexation process in order to be included in CFD 2005-1. Projects may be annexed one at a time, or in a group if they are ready at the same time.
The project, Omni Subdivision, owned by Century Communities of California, LLC, is prepared to proceed with the annexation process into CFD 2005-1. The project includes the development of 61 single-family residential units located on 10 acres of land. The boundaries of the Project consist of the area within assessor’s parcel number 003-200-006 and 003-200-007 as depicted in Exhibit B of Attachment 3.
Project Name Owner Units Location
Omni
Subdivision
Century Communities of
California, LLC 61 South of Ellis Street, and east of Sonora Street As with all residential subdivisions, conditions of approval for the subdivision require annexation into CFD 2005-1 prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. This will comprise the tenth annexation. See Attachment 4 for a history of annexations into CFD 2005-1.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The 2020/21 Fiscal Year CFD 2005-1 assessment for single-family residential development is approximately $499.48 per dwelling unit. Based on this figure, the estimated annual revenue that will be received by the City (Fund 76650) for all 61 units will be $30,468.28 per year. Because CFD 2005-1 includes an annual CPI adjustment, this amount will grow over time. The process for annexation is funded by the developer and no General Fund monies are used for this effort.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
The proposed action is not specifically addressed as part of the plan, is not in conflict with the plan, but rather is sympathetic of the underlying principles of the Vision 2025 Plan.
ALTERNATIVES:
The City Council adopted Ordinance C.S. 792 on December 7, 2005, authorizing the levy of a Special Tax within CFD 2005-1 commencing in fiscal year 2006-07 and each year thereafter. The Council could, at its discretion, consider alternative methods for funding the necessary services that are demanded by residential development and supported by CFD 2005-1. Amendment of the ordinance would be required.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution of Annexation
Exhibit A – Rate and Method of Apportionment
Exhibit B – Ballot
2. Resolution Calling for Election
Exhibit A – Ballot
3. Resolution of Results of Election
Exhibit A – Statement of Votes Cast
Exhibit B – Annexation Map
Exhibit C – List of Properties
4. CFD 2005-1 Map
Attachment 1 ─ Resolution of Annexation
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 10) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A
SPECIAL TAX AND SUBMITTING THE LEVY OF TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS WHEREAS, this City Council (Council), on December 1, 2021, adopted Resolution No. 20-56, (hereafter referred to as the “Resolution of Intention”) stating its intention to annex territory to City of Madera Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (hereafter referred to as “CFD No. 2005-1”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and WHEREAS, a copy of the Resolution of Intention, which states the authorized services to be provided and financed by CFD No. 2005-1, and a description and map of the proposed boundaries of the territory to be annexed known as Omni Subdivision (“Annexation No. 10”) to CFD No. 2005-1, is on file with the City Clerk and the provisions thereof are fully incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Annexation No. 10 will consist of 61 single-family residential units located in the southwest corner of the intersection of Ellis Street and North D Street; and WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the Council held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed annexation of territory to CFD No. 2005-1; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the annexation of territory to CFD No. 2005-1 and the levy of said special taxes within the area proposed to be annexed were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, prior to the time fixed for said hearing, written protests had not been filed against the proposed annexation of territory to CFD No. 2005-1 by (i) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in CFD No. 2005-1, or (ii) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1, or (iii) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1; and
WHEREAS, a boundary map for Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1 has been filed with the County Recorder of the County of Madera, which map shows the territory to be annexed in these proceedings, and a copy thereof is on file with the City Clerk.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council for the City of Madera as follows:
1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
2. All prior proceedings taken by this Council with respect to CFD No. 2005-1 and the proposed annexation of territory thereto have been duly considered and are hereby determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act.
3. The description and map of the boundaries of the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1, on file with the City Clerk are hereby finally approved, are incorporated herein by reference, and shall be included within the boundaries of CFD No. 2005-1, and said territory is hereby annexed to CFD No. 2005-1, subject to voter approval of the levy of the special taxes therein as hereinafter provided.
4. The services which CFD No. 2005-1 is authorized to finance are in addition to those provided in or required for the territory within CFD No. 2005-1 and the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1 and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services to be financed is as follows:
Police protection services and fire protection and suppression services, including but not limited to (i) the costs of contracting services, (ii) equipment, vehicles, ambulances and paramedics, fire apparatus, supplies, (iii) the salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide police protection services and fire protection and suppression services and other services as defined herein, respectively, and (iv) City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District. On each July 1 following the Base Year the increases attributed to salaries and benefits shall be calculated and limited to the increase based on the Annual Escalation Factor as provided in the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Taxes. The Special Tax will finance Services that are in addition to those provided in or required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. The Special Tax provides only partial funding for police and fire services.
Park Maintenance of the City of Madera, including but not limited to, labor, material, administration, personnel, equipment, and utilities necessary to maintain park improvements within the District, including recreational facilities, trees, plant material, sod, irrigation systems, sidewalks, drainage facilities, weed control and other abatements, public restrooms, signs, monuments, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the District.
Storm drainage system maintenance and operations of the City of Madera, including but not limited to, labor, material, administration, personnel, equipment, and utilities necessary to maintain and operate the storm drainage system within the District.
5. It is the intention of this legislative body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for said services to be provided in CFD No. 2005-1 and the territory proposed to be annexed as part of Annexation No. 10, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all nonexempt real property in Annexation No. 10, will be levied annually within the boundaries of Annexation No. 10 from and after the annexation of such property to CFD No. 2005-1. The special taxes shall be those as originally authorized through the formation of CFD No. 2005-1 and adopted by Ordinance of this legislative body, and no changes or modifications are proposed in the special taxes from those as originally set forth and made applicable to CFD No. 2005-1.
For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (the “RMA”), reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit “A,” which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation No. 10 to clearly estimate the maximum annual amount that said person will have to pay on said special tax.
6. The provisions of the Resolution of Intention of the City each as heretofore adopted by this Council are by this reference incorporated herein, as if fully set forth herein. (a) Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax within Annexation No. 10 shall be submitted to the voters within Annexation No. 10 at a special election called therefor as hereinafter provided. This Council hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within Annexation No. 10 for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the hearing heretofore conducted and concluded by this Council for the purposes of these annexation proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, this Council finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners within Annexation No. 10 and that the vote shall be by said landowners, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in Annexation No. 10.
(b) Pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by mail ballot under section 1340 of the California Elections Code. The Council called a special election to consider the measures described and incorporated as Exhibit “A,” which election will be conducted on January 19, 2022 (hereafter referred to as “Election Day”).
The City Clerk is the election official to conduct the election and provided each landowner in the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1, a ballot in the form of Exhibit “B”, which form is hereby approved. The City Clerk has accepted the ballots of the qualified electors received prior to 6:00 p.m. on Election Day, whether received by mail or by personal delivery.
(c) This Council hereby further finds that the provision of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days to elapse before said election is for the protection of voters, that the voters have waived such requirement and the date for the election hereinabove specified is established accordingly.
7. This resolution is effective immediately.
* * * * *
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION
CITY OF MADERA
COMMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2005-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
A Special Tax of Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 of the City of Madera (the “District”) shall be levied on all Assessor’s Parcels in the District and collected each Fiscal Year commencing Fiscal Year 2006- 07 in an amount determined by the City through the application of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax set forth below. All of the real property in the District, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.
A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
“Acre or Acreage” means the land area of an Assessor’s Parcel as shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor’s Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final subdivision map, other final map, other parcel map, other condominium plan, or functionally equivalent map or instrument recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The square footage of an Assessor’s Parcel is equal to the Acreage multiplied by 43,560.
“Act” means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Titles of the Government Code of the State of California, as amended, which authorizes the establishment of the District to finance: a) police protection services, and b) fire protection and suppression services, c) park maintenance, d) storm drainage system operation and maintenance and other services as defined herein including but not limited to ambulance and paramedic services. “Administrative Expenses” means the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City as administrator of the District to determine, levy and collect the Special Taxes, including the proportionate amount of the salaries and benefits of City employees whose duties are directly related to administration of the District and the fees of consultants, legal counsel, the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes upon the general tax rolls, preparation of required reports; and any other costs required to administer the District as determined by the City.
“Annual Escalation Factor” means the greater of the increase in the annual percentage change of the All Urban Consumers Consumer Price Index (CPI) or three percent (3%). The annual CPI used shall be for the area of San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA as reflected in the then-current April update. The annual CPI used shall be as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and may be obtained through the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr). If the foregoing index is not available, the District Administrator shall select a reasonably comparable index. “Assessor’s Parcel” means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor’s Parcel Map with an assigned assessor’s parcel number.
“Assessor’s Parcel Map” means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by assessor’s parcel number.
“Base Year” means Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2007.
“City” means the City of Madera.
“Council” means the City Council of the City of Madera, acting as the legislative body of the District. “County” means the County of Madera, California.
“Developed Multi-Family Residence” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing a residential structure consisting of two or more residential units that share common walls, including but not limited to, duplexes, triplexes, town homes, condominiums, and apartment units.
“Developed Property” means all Taxable Property, exclusive of Property Owner Association Property, Non-Residential Property, or Public Property, for which a building permit was issued after January 1, 2005, and prior to May 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. “Developed Single-Family Residence” means all Assessor’s Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit(s) has been issued for purposes of constructing one single-family residential dwelling unit. “District Administrator” means an official of the City, or designee thereof responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. “District” means Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 of the City of Madera. “Entitled Property” means an Assessor’s Parcel and/or Lot in the District, which has a Final Map recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, but for which no building permit has been issued prior to the May 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. The term “Entitled Property” shall apply only to Assessors’ Parcels and/or Lots, which have been subdivided for the purpose of residential development, excluding any Assessor’s Parcel that is designated as a remainder parcel determined by final documents and/or maps available to the District Administrator.
“Final Map” means an Assessor’s Parcel Map, a final subdivision map, other parcel map, other final map, other condominium plan, or functionally equivalent map that has been recorded in the Office of the County Recorder.
“Fiscal Year” means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. “Land Use Class” means any of the classes listed in Table 1. “Lot” means property within a recorded Final Map identified by a lot number for which a building permit has been issued or may be issued.
“Maximum Special Tax” means the maximum Special Tax, determined in accordance with Section C below that can be levied in the District in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor’s Parcel. “Non-Residential Property” means all Assessors’ Parcels for which a building permit(s) has been issued for a non-residential use and does not contain any residential units as defined under Developed Single Family Residence or Developed Multi-Family Residence.
“Property Owner Association Property” means any property within the boundaries of the District that is owned by, or irrevocably dedicated as indicated in an instrument recorded with the County Recorder to a property owner association, including any master or sub- association. “Proportionately” means in a manner such that the ratio of the actual Special Tax levy to the Maximum Special Tax is equal for all Assessor’s Parcels within each Land Use Class. “Public Property” means any property within the boundaries of the District that is, at the time of the District formation or at the time of an annexation, expected to be used for rights-of-way, parks, schools or any other public purpose and is owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the County, the City or any other public agency. “Service Costs” means the estimated and reasonable costs of providing police protection services and fire protection and suppression services, including but not limited to (i) the costs of contracting services, (ii) equipment, vehicles, ambulances and paramedics, fire apparatus, supplies, (iii) the salaries and benefits of City staff that directly provide police protection services and fire protection and suppression services and other services as defined herein, respectively, (iv) City overhead costs associated with providing such services within the District, (v) park maintenance, and (vi) storm drainage system operation and maintenance. On each July 1 following the Base Year, the increases attributed to salaries and benefits shall be calculated and limited to the increase based on the Annual Escalation Factor. The Special Tax will finance Services that are in addition to those provided in or required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing Services already available. The Special Tax provides only partial funding for police services, fire suppression and protection services, park maintenance, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance.
“Special Tax” means the Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Taxable Property to find the Special Tax Requirement, and shall include Special Taxes levied or to be levied under Sections C and D, below.
“Special Tax Requirement” means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for the District to: (i) pay for Service Costs; (ii) pay reasonable Administrative Expenses; (iii) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds; and (iv) pay for reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year; less any surplus of funds available from the previous Fiscal Year’s Special Tax levy.
“State” means the State of California.
“Property” means all of the Assessor’s Parcels within the boundaries of the District and any future annexation to the District that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or as defined herein. “Tax Exempt Property” means an Assessor’s Parcel not subject to the Special Tax. Tax- Exempt Property includes: (i) Public Property, (ii) Property Owner Association Property, (iii) Non-Residential Property, and (iv) property designated by the City or District Administrator as Tax-Exempt Property. “Undeveloped Property” means for each Fiscal Year, all Assessor’s Parcels of Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property or Entitled Property, including an Assessor’s Parcel that is designated as a remainder parcel and is not identified as potential Public Property by any final documents and/or maps available to the District Administrator.
“Unit” means any separate residential dwelling unit in which a person or persons may live, which comprises an independent facility capable of conveyance separate from adjacent residential dwelling units and is not considered to be for commercial or industrial use.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES
Each Fiscal Year using the definitions above, all Taxable Property within the District shall be classified as Developed Property, Entitled Property, or Undeveloped Property. Developed Property shall be further classified as Developed Single-Family Residence or Developed Multi-Family Residence. Commencing with the Base Year and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property shall be subject to Special Taxes pursuant to Sections C and D below.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE
1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY
TABLE 1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax
Per Unit1
1 Developed Single-Family Residence $311 per unit
2 Developed Multi-Family Residence $285 per unit
1 Maximum Special Tax includes Administrative Expenses
2. ENTITLED PROPERTY
TABLE 2
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR ENTITLED PROPERTY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax Per
Unit1
3 Entitled Property $166 per lot
1 Maximum Special Tax includes Administrative Expenses
On each July 1 following the Base Year (i.e., July 1, 2007), the Maximum Special Tax Rates in Table 1 and Table 2 shall be increased in accordance with the Annual Escalation Factor.
3. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
No Special Tax shall be levied on Undeveloped Property.
4. TAX-EXEMPT PROPERTY
No Special Tax shall be levied on Tax-Exempt Property.
5. MULTIPLE LAND USE CLASSES
In some instances an Assessor’s Parcel may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax levied on an Assessor’s Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax levies that can be imposed on all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor’s Parcel.
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-07, and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, the District Administrator shall calculate the Special Tax Requirement based on the definitions in Section A and levy the Special Tax as follows until the amount of the Special Tax levied equals the Special Tax Requirement. First, the Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Developed Property Proportionately between Developed Single- Family Residence and Developed Multi-Family Residence up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax. Second, if the Special Tax Requirement has not been satisfied by the first step, then the Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year on each Assessor’s Parcel of Entitled Property up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax for Entitled Property.
E. APPEALS
Any taxpayer that believes that the amount of the Special Tax assigned to an Assessor’s Parcel is in error may file a written notice with the District Administrator appealing the levy of the Special Tax. This notice is required to be filed with the District Administrator during the Fiscal Year the error is believed to have occurred. The District Administrator or designee will then promptly review the appeal and, if necessary, meet with the taxpayer. If the District Administrator verifies that the tax should be changed, the Special Tax levy shall be corrected and, if applicable in any case, a refund shall be granted.
F. EXEMPTIONS
No Special Tax shall be levied on Non-Residential Property, Undeveloped Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property.
G. MANNER OF COLLECTION
Special Tax as levied pursuant to Section D above shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the District Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District or as otherwise determined appropriate by the District Administrator.
H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX
After the establishment of the District, the City Council may reexamine, if deemed necessary by City Council, the necessity of the continuance of the Special Tax through the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Analysis, otherwise the Special Tax shall be levied in perpetuity.
EXHIBIT B TO RESOLUTION OF ANNEXATION
City of Madera
Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, (Public Services), Annexation No. 10
OFFICIAL BALLOT
SPECIAL TAX ANNEXATION ELECTION
This ballot is for the special landowner election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed envelope to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Madera no later than 6:00 o’clock p.m. on Wednesday, January 19, 2022 either by mail or in person. The City Clerk’s office is located at City Hall, 205 W Fourth Street, Madera, California, 93637.
To vote, mark in the voting square after the word “YES” or after the word “NO”. For a list of acceptable marks, please refer to the back of this ballot.
If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk of the City of Madera and obtain another.
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Madera, by and for its Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the “CFD”), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFD pursuant to and as described in the Resolution of Intention of the City of Madera adopted by its Council on December 1, 2021?
YES:
NO:
By execution in the space provided below, you also confirm your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for notice of election and analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326 (a) and 53327 (b) of the California Government Code.
Acres Owned Within Territory Annexed:
Number of Votes:
Property Owner:
Property Owner/ Authorized Representative Signature: __________________________ □
□
Attachment 2 ─ Resolution Calling for Election
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE VOTERS OF ANNEXATION NO. 10 OF CITY OF MADERA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 THE PROPOSITION REGARDING THE ANNUAL LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO
FINANCE POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES, FIRE PROTECTION AND SUPPRESSION
SERVICES, PARK MAINTENANCE, AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE WITHIN THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the California Government Code the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Madera (hereafter referred to as the “City”) has adopted the resolution authorizing the annexation of territory known as Omni Subdivision (hereafter referred to as “Annexation No. 10”) to City of Madera Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, County of Madera, State of California (hereafter referred to as “CFD No. 2005-1”). Annexation No. will consist of 61 single -family residential units located southwest corner of the intersection of Ellis Street and North D Street; and WHEREAS, by that resolution, the City Council called a special election on the propositions to be submitted to the voters of the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1 with respect to the levy of special taxes therein for the financing of police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, park maintenance, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance within CFD No. 2005- 1; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53326 of the California Government Code, it is necessary that the City Council submit to the voters of Annexation No. 9 the annual levy of special taxes on taxable property within Annexation No. 9; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Manager has advised the City Council that the property owners of the subject parcels have reported to the City staff that all of the subject parcels are uninhabited with no voters registered at the subject parcel. City Staff has personally visited the sites and found that there are no occupied dwellings on the subject parcels. Staff has advised the City Council that the annexation area qualifies as uninhabited as there are less than 12 persons registered to vote within Annexation No. 10; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council for the City of Madera Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Annexation No. 10 as follows:
1. The City Council finds that: (i) the foregoing recitals are true and correct; (ii) 12 persons have not been registered to vote within the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1 for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing on January 19, 2022; (iii) pursuant to Section 53326 of the California Government Code, as a result of the findings set forth in clause (ii) above, the vote in the special election called by this resolution shall be by the landowners of the territory to be annexed to CFD No. 2005-1, whose property would be subject to the special taxes if they were levied at the time of the election, and each landowner shall have one vote for each acre, or portion thereof, which he or she owns within Annexation No. 10 which would be subject to the proposed special taxes if they were levied at the time of the election; (iv) the owners of all of the land in Annexation No. 10 by written consent (a) waived the time limits set forth in Section 53326 of the California Government Code for holding the election called by this resolution and the election on the propositions, (b) consented to the holding of the election on January 19, 2022, (c) waived notice and mailed notice of the time and date of the election, (d) waived an impartial analysis by the City Attorney of the ballot propositions pursuant to Section 9280 of the California Elections Code and arguments and rebuttals pursuant to Sections 9281 to 9287, inclusive, and 9295 of that Code, and mailing of a statement pursuant to Section 9401 of that Code, and (e) waived a synopsis of the measures to be included in the official ballot for said elections pursuant to Section 12111 of that Code; and (v) the City Clerk (hereafter referred to as the “City Clerk”) has consented to the holding of the election on January 19, 2022.
2. The City Council hereby calls and schedules a special election for January 19, 2022, on the proposition of the annual levy of special taxes on taxable property within Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1 to finance police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, park maintenance, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance within Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1.
3. The proposition to be submitted to the voters of Annexation No. 10 at such special election shall be as follows:
Shall the City of Madera, by and for its Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the “CFD”), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFD pursuant to and as described in the Resolution of Intention of the City of Madera adopted by its Council on December 1, 2021.
4. Except as otherwise provided in Section 6 hereof, the special election shall be conducted by the City Clerk in accordance with the provisions of the California Elections Code governing mail ballot elections of cities, and in particular the provisions of Division 4 (commencing with Section 4000), of that Code, insofar as they may be applicable.
5. The procedures to be followed in conducting the special election on the proposition with respect to the levy of special taxes on taxable property within Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1 to pay for police protection services, fire protection and suppression services, park maintenance, and storm drainage system operation and maintenance within the District:
(a) Pursuant to Section 53326 of the California Government Code, ballots for the Special Election shall be distributed to the qualified electors by the City Clerk by mail or by personal service.
(b) Pursuant to applicable sections of the California Elections Code governing the conduct of mail ballot elections of cities, and in particular Division 4 (commencing with Section 4000) of that Code with respect to election conducted by mail, the City Clerk, or designated official shall mail or deliver to each qualified elector an official ballot in the appropriate form attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” and shall also mail or deliver to all such qualified electors a ballot pamphlet and instructions to voter, a return identification envelope addressed to the City Clerk for the return of voted official ballots.
(c) The official ballot to be mailed or delivered by the City Clerk to each landownervoter shall have printed or typed thereon the name of the landowner-voter and the number of votes to be voted by the landowner-voter and shall have appended to it a certification to be signed by the person voting the official ballot which shall certify that the person signing the certification is the person who voted the official ballot, and if the landowner-voter is other than a natural person, that he or she is an officer of or other person affiliated with the landowner-voter entitled to vote such official ballot, that he or she has been authorized to vote such official ballot on behalf of the landowner-voter, that in voting such official ballot it was his or her intent, as well as the intent of the landowner-voter, to vote all votes to which the landowner-voter is entitled based on its land ownership on the propositions set forth in the official ballot as marked thereon in the voting square opposite each such proposition, and further certifying as to the acreage of the landownervoter’s land ownership within Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1. (d) The return identification envelope mailed or delivered by the City Clerk to each landowner-voter shall have printed or typed thereon the following: (i) the name of the landowner, (ii) the address of the landowner, (iii) a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that the voter is the landowner or the authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote the enclosed ballot and is the person whose name appears on the identification envelope, (iv) the printed name and signature of the voter, (v) the address of the voter, (vi) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration, and (vii) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the City Clerk. (e) The information to voter form to be delivered by the City Clerk to the landownervoters shall inform them that the official ballots shall be returned to the City Clerk properly voted as provided thereon and with the certification appended thereto properly completed and signed in the sealed return identification envelope with the certification thereon completed and signed and all other information to be inserted thereon properly inserted by 6:00 p.m. on the 19th day of January 2022; provided that if all qualified electors have voted, the elections shall be closed with the concurrence of the City Clerk.
(f) Upon receipt of the return identification envelopes, which are returned prior to the voting deadline on the date of the elections, the City Clerk shall canvass the votes cast in the election, and shall file a statement with the City Council as to the results of such canvass and the election on each proposition set forth in the official ballot.
6. This resolution is effective immediately.
* * * * *
EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION CALLING FOR ELECTION
City of Madera
Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, (Public Services), Annexation No. 10
OFFICIAL BALLOT
SPECIAL TAX ANNEXATION ELECTION
This ballot is for the special landowner election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed envelope to the office of the City Clerk of the City of Madera no later than 6:00 o’clock p.m. on Wednesday, January 19, 2022 either by mail or in person. The City Clerk’s office is located at City Hall, 205 W Fourth Street, Madera, California, 93637.
To vote, mark in the voting square after the word “YES” or after the word “NO”. For a list of acceptable marks, please refer to the back of this ballot.
If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the City Clerk of the City of Madera and obtain another.
BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the City of Madera, by and for its Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the “CFD”), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory annexed to the CFD pursuant to and as described in the Resolution of Intention of the City of Madera adopted by its Council on December 1, 2021?
YES:
NO:
By execution in the space provided below, you also confirm your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for notice of election and analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326 (a) and 53327 (b) of the California Government Code.
Acres Owned Within Territory Annexed:
Number of Votes:
Property Owner:
Property Owner/ Authorized Representative Signature: __________________________ □
□
Attachment 3 ─ Resolution of Results of Election
RESOLUTION NO. ____
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS, CERTIFYING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION AND ADDING THE TERRITORY IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Madera (the "City Council"), has previously formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, said Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District being designated as Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (hereafter referred to as CFD No. 2005-1); and WHEREAS, the City Council initiated proceedings to annex certain territory known as Omni Subdivision (hereafter referred to as "Annexation No. 10") to Community Facilities District No. 2005-1.
Annexation No. 10 consists of 61 single-family residential units located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Ellis Street and North D Street; and
WHEREAS, at this time the unanimous consent to the annexation of Annexation No. 10 has been received from the property owner or owners of such territory; and WHEREAS, less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the territory of Annexation No. 10 for each of the ninety (90) days preceding September 17, 2021, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified electors of Annexation No. 10 shall be the "landowners" of Annexation No. 10 as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f) and each such landowner who is the owner of record, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within Annexation No. 10; and
WHEREAS, the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes on the property within Annexation No. 10 to the qualified electors of Annexation No. 10 and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of Annexation No. 10; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Madera has caused ballots to be distributed to the qualified electors of Annexation No. 10, has received and canvassed such ballots and made a report to the City Council regarding the results of such canvas, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, at this time the measures voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified electors, and the City Council desires to declare the results of the election; and WHEREAS, a map showing the territory to be annexed and designated as Annexation No. 10 (hereafter referred to as the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and a list of Assessor Parcel Numbers and landowners, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit C hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, has been submitted to the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council for the City of Madera Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Annexation No. 10 as follows:
1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
2. This City Council does hereby determine as follows:
(a) The unanimous consent to the annexation of Annexation No. 10 to CFD No. 2005-1 has been given by all of the owners within Annexation No. 10 and such consent shall be kept on file in the Office of the City Clerk. (b) Less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the territory of Annexation No. 10 for each of the ninety (90) days preceding January 19, 2022, therefore, pursuant to the Act the qualified electors of Annexation No. 10 shall be the "landowners" of such Annexation No. 10 as such term is defined in Government Code Section 53317(f).
(c) The qualified electors of Annexation No. 10 have unanimously voted in favor of the levy of special taxes within Annexation No. 10 upon its annexation to CFD No. 2005-1.
3. The boundaries and parcels of territory within Annexation No. 10 and on which special taxes will be levied in order to pay for the costs and expenses of authorized public services are shown on the Annexation Map as submitted to and hereby approved by this City Council.
4. The City Council does hereby determine and declare that Annexation No. 10 is now added to and becomes a part of CFD No. 2005-1. The City Council, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2005-1, is hereby empowered to levy the authorized special tax within Annexation No. 10.
5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, notice shall be given as follows:
An Amendment No. 10 to the Amended Notice of Special Tax Lien shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder no later than fifteen (15) days after the date of adoption of this Resolution.
6. This resolution is effective immediately.
* * * * *
Exhibit A TO RESOLUTION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION
Certificate of Election Official and Statement of Votes Cast
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF MADERA ) ss.
CITY OF MADERA )
The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF MADERA, COUNTY OF MADERA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the
CITY OF MADERA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
ANNEXATION NO. 10
SPECIAL ELECTION
held in the City of Madera, on January 19, 2022.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in the area proposed to be annexed, Annexation No. 10 to Community Facilities District No. 2005- 1 of the City of Madera for or against the Measure are full, true and correct.
VOTES CASTED: YES________
NO ________
WITNESS my hand this _____ day of _______________, 2022 Exhibit B TO RESOLUTION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION
Annexation Map
VICINTYMAP
Legend
[_-_-_-_-J Clty5oonaar1e-,
c:::J AMexauoo Parcet,
<!) Map Rer,Hel\Oi! NlrlWer
rn
1 in = 125fee1
ANNEXATION MAP NO.10
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-01
l ELLIS ST
i
!~
\5 :ij \~
Q)
CITY OF MADERA
COUNTY OF MADERA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0 MAP REFERENCE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER NUMBER
I 003-2()().()06
2 003-2()().007
\ I
k
0 SHEET 1 OF 1
f ll!:.0 IN THE OFFICE Of TH!:. CITY CLERK THI$
O"YOf ___ , 20_ .
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT TH!: WITHIN MAP SHOWING
PRO.?OS!:O 8 0UNOAlUES Of " NNEJV.TO H MAP NO. 10 OF
COMMUNITY F"ClLITIES OISTIUCT NO 2005-01. CITY Of
MA.DEM. COUNTY OF MA.OE.~ STATE Of CALIFORNIA... WAS
AP?ROVE.0 8 Y THE CITY COUNCIL Of TH: CITY Of MADERA.AT
A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD OH THE
O" Y Of ___ •20_. BY ITS RESO~
CITY CL-ERK
CITYOF MAO!:RA
f ll!:D TlilS =~~-- O"Y Of = --~-,, 20_. AT THE HOUR OF ___ O"CLOCK __ .M. IN 6 00K ___ ?AGE($ ) ___ OF MAPS Of
"$$ESSMENT AHO COMMUNITY f"CIU11E$ DISTRICT ANO
~g~~~~:'DE~. ~.,~ ,~HE ~ CO~ ~U~NT~Y ~T:o~~~~;ET~:
C"UFORNIA.
COUNTY RECORDER.
COUNTY OF MADERA
STATE Of CALIFORNIA
REFERENCE IS MADE TO THAT BOUNDARY OF COMMUNITY
fACILITI!:$ OISTAICT NO. 2005-01 Of THE CITY Of MAOEAA
RECOROEO WITH THE MAOERA COUNTY RECORO!:.R'S OFFICE OH OCTOBER 7, 2005, IN 8001( 4 Of W .f>S Of ASSESSM!:.NT " ND COMMUNITY F"cn.mES DISTRICT ON -PAGES 42
THROUGH 45.
TH!:. LIN!:$ AHO 0 1"4!:.NSlONS OF EACH LOT OR :?A.RC.!:L SHOWN ON THIS DIAGRAM SHA.!..L 8 E THOSE LINES ANO
DIMENSIONS AS SHOWM ON THE MADERA COUNTY
" $$ESSO.R'S MAPS FO.R THOS!: ?ARCELS LISTED.
TH!: MAO!:RA COUNTY "SSESSO.R"S MAP SHAlL GOVERN FOR
Al l DETAIL CONC!:.RNING Tli.!: LINES A."40 01.M!:NSIONS OF SUCH LOTS OR PA.RCELS
W w1LLDAN
EXHIBIT C TO RESOLUTION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION
List of Assessor Parcel Numbers and Landowners
APN Landowner
003-240-006-000 Century Community of California, LLC
003-240-007-000 Century Community of California, LLC
Attachment 4 – CFD 2005-1 Map
CITY OF MADERA
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2005-01
-11 Legend
D cay Limits
LJ Parcels
Annexations
-· 2
LJ 3 -
LJ· 5 -6 -7 -8 g-•o
N
E s
0 0-1~ 0.2!1 0.5 ON 1- •
L
• "-'-""-I
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
_________________________________ Agenda Number:
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Establishment of Cannabis Business Tax Rates
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution setting the Cannabis Business Tax rates for various types of commercial business permits
SUMMARY:
Historically, the City has prohibited cannabis businesses from operating within the City. However, with the evolving landscape surrounding the sale and use of cannabis in the State, the City Council (Council) directed staff to retain HdL, a leading subject matter expert, to begin the process of developing a regulatory ordinance to allow, permit, regulate and tax cannabis businesses, conducting a cost recovery fee study, and developing a cannabis tax ordinance and accompanying ballot measure to be placed on the November 3, 2020 election.
The approval of Measure R by the voters in November 2020 and subsequent approval of multiple ordinances and resolutions provided the Council authority to set and impose the Cannabis Business Tax. Council is being asked this evening to consider staff’s recommendation and set a tax rate.
DISCUSSION:
As approved by voters, Measure R defined the maximum amounts that can be charged by a Cannabis Business License Tax. While the figures represent maximums, Council has the option to set lower rates for each type of cannabis activity. Additionally, Council may raise or lower the tax rate from time to time by resolution; however, the tax rate may not exceed the maximum rate authorized by voters.
D-1
In short, voters approved the following maximum tax rates:
▪ $10 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation) ▪ 6 percent gross receipts for retail businesses
▪ 4 percent for all other cannabis business activities
A review of nearby communities with established cannabis business tax rates shows that the current cannabis business tax rates range between 4 and 10 percent for retail. The lowest being the City of Fresno and the highest being Coalinga and Riverbank. For cultivation, it varies. Some communities charge a percent while other charges on a per square foot basis. Table 1 provides an overview of nearby communities.
Table 1: Cannabis Business Tax Rates of nearby communities (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Municipality Retail Cultivation (6) Distribution Manufacturing Testing California City 6% $7 sf 0.5% 1% 2%
Coalinga 10% $7 sf Varies (7) Varies (7) Varies (7)
City of Fresno 4% $6 sf 1% 4% 0%
Hanford 4% $10 sf 2% 2.5% 1%
Lemoore 5% $6 cf tier system $15 sf tier system
City of Merced 7% $7 sf or 4% GR $1 sf or 2%
GR $7 sf $0.25 sf
Modesto 8% 2.5% 6% 4% 2.5%
Riverbank 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
Turlock 5% GR or
lump sum $10 sf 2.5% $10 sf DA(8)
Atwater DA; voters approved max tax of $.15 for every $1.00 revenue Ceres DA
Gustine DA & Operating Agreement
Livingston No tax established yet - reviewing/revising ordinance Mendota DA
Oakdale DA
Parlier DA; calculation by square footage or alternative is 4% gross revenue (1) This table is not intended to be exhaustive, rather it provides an overview; data collected in December 2021
(2) SF: Square foot
(3) CF: Cubic foot
(4) GR: Gross Revenue
(5) DA: Development Agreement; agreement that defines conditions (6) Cultivation varies by lighting type. For purposes of this table, included is exclusively artificial lighting.
(7) $25 sf for the first 3k sf, $10 sf thereafter
(8) No test labs; will establish when a business expresses interest In an effort to be competitive to neighboring cities’, it is recommended that Council set the cannabis business tax rate to be on par with surrounding cities as outlined in Table 2.
Table 2: Recommended rates (1) (2)
Maximum
rate
approved by
voters
Recommended
rate
Commercial cannabis cultivation, including cultivation of industrial hemp A. Exclusively artificial lighting $10 sf $6 sf
B. Combination of natural and supplemental lighting
(Section 6-4.04 Q of MMC)
$7 sf $4 sf
C. No artificial lighting $4 sf $2 sf
D. Nursery $2 sf $1 sf
Testing laboratory for cannabis, cannabis products,
industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products
2% of gross
receipts
1% of gross
receipts
Retail sales of cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp, and/or industrial hemp products, including as a retailer (dispensary) or non-storefront retailer (retail delivery business), or microbusiness
6% of gross
receipts
4% of gross
receipts
Distribution of cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products
3% of gross
receipts
2% of gross
receipts
Manufacturing or processing of cannabis, cannabis
products, industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products, or any other type of cannabis business
4% of gross
receipts
2% of gross
receipts
(1) Annual tax rates specified above shall increase by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”)
(2) Resolution would set rates through January 1, 2024
The cannabis business tax rate would apply to all for-profit and non-profit businesses involved in commercial cannabis activities within the City, including delivering, dispensing, distributing, processing, manufacturing, selling, or testing. The tax would not be imposed on persons engaged only in personal cultivation for personal consumption in accordance with current State law.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
It is anticipated that the new tax will result in discretionary revenue for the General Fund estimated between $720,000 to $1,080,000 annually once all the business operations are up in running for at least 12 months. Amounts were estimated analyzing data from other communities, tax rates, purchasing power, etc.
It is further noted that the costs associated with cannabis related work includes the following:
▪ Contract with HdL totaling $30,000. It is noted that on September 1, 2021 Council approved an amendment to the City’s agreement with HdL where they will assist staff review applications and prepare reports for City consideration at a flat rate of $5,900 per each.
▪ Cost to place the ballot measure on the November 3, 2020 election was approximately $100,000.
▪ Various staff time and City Attorney fees.
Note that HdL contract cost may be recovered by fees from potential applicants should the City permit cannabis activities in the City.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
While not specifically addressed, the requested action is consistent with the Vision Madera 2025 Plan; Effective Government: Strategy 115. – Ensure sufficient economic resources to provide adequate City services and prepare for future growth.
ALTERNATIVES:
The Council may elect to not approve the resolution or may direct staff to return with additional information. Moreover, Council may suggest alternative rates to those outlined by staff in Table
2. ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
Resolution No. _______
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA
ESTABLISHING CANNABIS BUSINESS TAX RATES FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF
COMMERCIAL CANNABIS BUSINESS PERMITS
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2020, voters of the City of Madera approved Measure R in favor of establishing a cannabis business tax on cannabis and hemp businesses within the City if the City permits and regulates such businesses; and
WHEREAS, the cannabis business tax ordinance approved by the voters is codified in Chapter 4 to Title VI of the Madera Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on June 16, 2021, the City Council of the City of Madera adopted Ordinance No. 977 C.S. adding Chapter 5 to Title VI (Cannabis Businesses) to the Madera Municipal Code to establish a regulatory program requiring all commercial cannabis uses to obtain a commercial cannabis business permit issued by the City prior to commencing operation within the City; and WHEREAS, Madera Municipal Code Section 6-4.05 provides that the Council may by resolution set cannabis business tax rates at annual rates not to exceed $10.00 per canopy square foot for cultivation (adjustable for inflation), 6% gross receipts for retail businesses, and 4% for all other such businesses; and
WHEREAS, the Council wishes to implement the cannabis business tax at rates authorized under Madera Municipal Code Section 6-4.05.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Madera as follows:
Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference.
Section 2. The City Council approves the cannabis business tax rates established by this Resolution.
Section 3. The rate of the cannabis business tax shall be calculated as follows:
A. For every person engaged in commercial cannabis cultivation, including cultivation of industrial hemp, in the City:
1. Through January 1, 2024, the annual rate shall be:
a. Six dollars ($6.00) per square foot of canopy space in a facility that uses exclusively artificial lighting.
b. Four dollars ($4.00) per square foot of canopy space in a facility that uses a combination of natural and supplemental lighting as defined in Section 6-4.04 Q of this chapter.
c. Two dollars ($2.00) per square foot of canopy space in a facility that uses no artificial lighting.
d. One dollar ($1.00) per square foot of canopy space for any nursery.
2. In accordance with Madera Municipal Code Section 6-4.05, on January 1, 2024, and on each January 1, thereafter, the annual tax rates specified above shall increase by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for consumers in the Western Region as published by the United States Government Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, no CPI adjustment resulting in a decrease of any tax imposed by this resolution shall be made.
3. For every person engaged in the operation of a testing laboratory for cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products s/he/it shall be subject to the tax rate not to exceed one percent (1%) of gross receipts.
4. For every person engaged in retail sales of cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp, and/or industrial hemp products, including as a retailer (dispensary) or non-storefront retailer (retail delivery business), or microbusiness, s/he/it shall be subject to the tax rate not to exceed four percent (4%) of gross receipts.
5. For every person engaged in distribution of cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products, s/he/it shall be subject to the tax rate not to exceed two percent (2%) of gross receipts.
6. For every person engaged in manufacturing or processing of cannabis, cannabis products, industrial hemp and/or industrial hemp products, or any other type of cannabis business not described in Section 6-4.05 (C) (1), (2), (3), or (4) s/he/it shall be subject to the tax rate not to exceed two percent (2%) of gross receipts.
Section 3. The City Manager and Finance Director are authorized to establish administrative procedures as they deem necessary to facilitate the orderly and efficient implementation of the cannabis business tax which are consistent with this Resolution.
Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
_________________________________ Agenda Number: ___________ Dino Lawson, Chief of Police
_________________________________
Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Request by the Greater Madera Kiwanis to assist in the 4th of July community event RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a resolution waiving the fees to cover the costs of police services in the amount of$2,869
2. Provide direction on the City’s involvement in the Community event SUMMARY:
The Greater Madera Kiwanis (Kiwanis), a local service club, is in the early stages of planning a community event for the 4th of July. Historically, the City hosted the event at the Madera Municipal Golf Course, but due to budget constraints and more recently the COVID-19 pandemic, last did so in 2017. In an effort to bring back civic pride, the Kiwanis approached the City about taking the lead at the event. While this would be the first year in recent memory that a local service club will be hosting the event, they have requested the City’s assistance.
DISCUSSION:
While discussions are ongoing, the Kiwanis have formally requested that the City cover the costs associated with Police Department's involvement with the event. Costs include traffic control and security. The cost is estimated at $2,869.
In addition, the Kiwanis have identified areas where they may potentially need assistance, including, but not limited to:
▪ Developing promotional material, including a flyer and video ▪ Transporting spectators from an off-site parking lot to and from the Fairgrounds via the Madera Metro buses the day of the event
▪ Identifying and contacting firework display companies E-1
▪ Designating City staff the day of the event for kid related activities, such as pop-up style games
▪ Program development
▪ Yet to be determined financial assistance
It is worth noting that historically the City hosted the firework show, one of its most successful endeavors. The event was organized by the Parks & Community Services Department and included a golf tournament the day of. Records indicate that the cost to host the event was approximately $60k, offset by $30k in revenues. These figures do not include costs incurred by other City departments, such as the Police Department. Included in the figure was $25k for the firework display.
While yet to be determined, the Kiwanis have expressed a desire to partner with other organizations and are expecting funding via donations, with the goal of making the event affordable to Madera families. To date, the City, County, Police, Sheriff, Probation, and Fire Department have attended the meetings.
It is noted that hosting the event at the Fairgrounds may potentially be more expensive in comparison to the Golf Course considering the rental fee and permits from the State Fire Marshall; however, it provides greater parking, restrooms, concessions, centrally located, etc., in comparison to the Golf Course.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost of providing police services to assist with traffic control and security is estimated at $2,869, which is the overtime rate for 7 officers. The total amount being petitioned for Council relief is $2,869. Cost for development of promotional material, program development, etc., is difficult to determine considering that the City’s role is evolving. In addition, it is expected that the Kiwanis will likely request additional financial assistance from the City. When said request is made, the item would be brought before Council. As an alternative, Council may direct staff to identify an amount.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE VISION MADERA 2025 PLAN:
▪ Strategy 317: “Develop and encourage festival, gatherings, and events…” ▪ Strategy 313: “Provide year-round programs fostering community pride…” ALTERNATIVES:
Council may decline the request to waive fees or may request additional information.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution waiving the fees to cover police service related to the 4 th of July community
event in the amount of $2,869.
2. Letter received from Kiwanis.
RESOLUTION NO. 21-______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA WAIVING THE FEES TO COVER COSTS OF POLICE SERVICES RELATING TO THE 4 TH OF
JULY COMMUNITY EVENT FOR THE GREATER MADERA KIWANIS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,869.00
WHEREAS, on January 19, 2022, the City Council of the City of Madera considered a request by Greater Madera Kiwanis to waive the fees to cover police service costs relating to the 4 th of July community event; and
WHEREAS, the Greater Madera Kiwanis are planning and organizing this community event providing citizens of Madera and neighboring areas a place to celebrate safely; and WHEREAS, the City fees for Police services are $2,869; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it is in the best interest of the City to approve the waiver of fees; and
WHEREAS, this request provides a public benefit to the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA hereby resolves, finds, determines and orders as follows:
1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Council finds that the waiver of fees as set forth in this resolution serves a public purpose and is in the best interest and welfare of the City and its residents.
3. The City Council does hereby waive the City fees requested by the Greater Madera Kiwanis in the amount of $2,869 associated with the 4
th of July community event.
4. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption. * * * * * * * *
Greater Madera Kiwanis
4th of July 2022 Event
Madera FairGrounds
Madera, Ca 93637
Mr Mayor and Fellow Council Members,
On behalf of the Greater Madera Kiwanis, we respectfully request waiving the costs associated with the Police Department’s services for the 4th of July 2022 Event , This year's event will take place on Monday July 4th , 2022 and will begin at 5pm.
This is the first year the Kiwanis Club is hosting the community event in order to help reduce the financial burden placed on the city in previous years.
This event has been traditionally held at the Madera Municipal Golf Course bringing large numbers of people out to enjoy a day of festivities and an amazing fireworks display. In an effort to expand and improve the experience we have elected to move the event to the Madera FairGrounds. In doing so we believe this year's event will bring together our community after the hardships of Covid.
We would like to thank everyone for their time and consideration in helping bring together this amazing event.
Respectfully,
Rohi Zacharia
President of Greater Madera Kiwanis Club
January 19, 2022
Madera City Council Meeting
Agenda Item E-2
Seek Direction Regarding the 2022 Regular City Council Meeting Schedule (Report by Arnoldo Rodriguez)
There is no written report for this item.
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Approved by: Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
_________________________________ Agenda Number: ___________ Arnoldo Rodriguez, City Manager
SUBJECT:
Remote City Council Meetings Under Brown Act Requirements (Assembly Bill 361) RECOMMENDATION:
1. Council to decide to allow Public Meetings by the City Council and All Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees of the City with the remote meeting requirements set forth by the Brown Act; or
2. Council to decide to adopt a Resolution Authorizing Remote Teleconference Public Meetings by the City Council and All Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees of the City in Accordance with Assembly Bill 361 for a Period of 30 Days SUMMARY:
After meeting remotely since the beginning of the pandemic, on November 3, 2021, Council elected to return to in-person meetings consistent with the Brown Act. Unfortunately, our community has experienced a recent influx in COVID-19 cases, and it appears prudent to revisit this item.
The City may continue Public Meetings with the remote meeting requirements set forth by the Brown Act or may choose to utilize the option for remote meetings under AB 361. The latter allows for the remote meeting procedures that the City had been using throughout the COVID19 pandemic, subject to certain requirements that must be considered as part of the initial determination (by resolution) to adopt remote meeting protocols.
In short, the City may:
▪ Continue to meet per regular Brown Act provisions; permits remote meetings per Government Code section 54953(b)(3); or
▪ Utilize the option under AB 361 for remote meetings
E-3
DISCUSSION:
The City may meet via remote teleconferencing if it adopts a resolution, that makes specific findings in support of conducting remote meetings. The City may extend the authorization in additional 30 day increments for the duration of the declared emergency, or until the Council decides to return to in-person meetings, or otherwise continues to comply with the regular remote meeting requirements of the Brown Act.
Table 1 identifies the differences between standard Brown Act remote teleconferencing and AB 361 teleconferencing. It is noted the City must still provide advance notice of public meetings and must continue to post meeting agendas consistent with the provisions of the Brown Act.
Table 1: Comparison of Public Meeting requirements (Brown Act vs. AB 361) Brown Act Requirement Requirement Under AB 361
If the legislative body of a local agency elects
to use teleconferencing, it shall post agendas
at all teleconference locations and conduct
teleconference meetings in a manner that
protects the statutory and constitutional
rights of the parties or the public appearing
before the legislative body of a local agency.
▪ Agendas not required to be posted at all
teleconference locations.
▪ Meeting must still be conducted in a
manner that protects the statutory and
constitutional rights of the parties or the
public appearing before the legislative
body of a local agency.
If the legislative body of a local agency elects
to use teleconferencing, each teleconference
location shall be identified in the notice and
agenda of the meeting or proceeding, and
each teleconference location shall be
accessible to the public.
▪ Agendas are not required to identify each
teleconference location in the meeting
notice/agenda.
▪ Local agencies are not required to make
each teleconference location accessible
to the public.
If the legislative body of a local agency elects
to use teleconferencing during the
teleconferenced meeting, at least a quorum
of the members of the legislative body shall
participate from locations within the
boundaries of the territory over which the
local agency exercises jurisdiction.
▪ No requirement to have a quorum of
board members participate from within
the territorial bounds of the local
agency’s jurisdiction.
If the legislative body of a local agency elects
to use teleconferencing, the agenda shall
provide an opportunity for members of the
public to address the legislative body directly
at each teleconference location.
▪ In each instance in which notice of the
time of the teleconferenced meeting is
given or the agenda for the meeting is
posted, the legislative body shall also give
notice of the manner by which members
of the public may access the meeting and
offer public comment.
▪ The agenda shall identify and include an
opportunity for all persons to attend via a
Table 1: Comparison of Public Meeting requirements (Brown Act vs. AB 361) Brown Act Requirement Requirement Under AB 361
call-in option or an internet-based service
option.
▪ The legislative body shall allow members
of the public to access the meeting, and
the agenda shall include an opportunity
for members of the public to address the
legislative body directly.
▪ In the event of a disruption which
prevents the local agency from
broadcasting the meeting to members of
the public using the call-in option or
internet-based service option, or in the
event of a disruption within the local
agency’s control which prevents
members of the public from offering
public comments using the call-in option
or internet-based service option, the
legislative body shall take no further
action on items appearing on the meeting
agenda until public access to the meeting
via the call-in option or internet-based
service option is restored.
▪ Written/remote public comment must be
accepted until the point at which the
public comment period is formally closed;
registration/sign-up to provide/be
recognized to provide public comment
can only be closed when the public
comment period is formally closed.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Regarding Remote Teleconference Meetings
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA
AUTHORIZING REMOTE TELECONFERENCE MEETINGS BY THE CITY
COUNCIL AND ALL BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND STANDING
COMMITTEES OF THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 361
FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY DAYS
WHEREAS, COVID-19 (also known as the “Coronavirus Disease”) is a respiratory disease that has spread across the globe, with thousands of confirmed cases in California, including the City of Madera; and
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2020, the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services declared a public health emergency based on the threat caused by COVID-19, and the President of the United States issued a Proclamation Declaring a National Emergency Concerning COVID-19 beginning March 1, 2020; and
WHEREAS, in response to COVID-19, the Governor of the State of California issued a Proclamation of a State of Emergency in response to COVID-19 on March 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Madera adopted a proclamation of a local emergency related to the COVID-19 virus on March 16, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City of Madera (“City”) is committed to preserving and fostering public access, transparency, observation, and participation in meetings of the City Council and Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees (hereafter collectively referred to as “legislative bodies;” and
WHEREAS, all meetings of the City Council and legislative bodies are open and public as required by the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code sections 54950 – 54963, so that any member of the public may attend, observe, and participate in a meaningful way; and WHEREAS, Government Section 54953 (b) (3) of the Brown Act allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings by teleconference and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to attend and to address the local legislative body, as long as the following requirements are met:
1. Each teleconference location from which a member is participating is noticed on the agenda;
2. Each teleconference location is accessible to the public;
3. Members of the public must be able to address the body at each teleconference location;
4. At least one member of the legislative body must be physically present at the location specified in the meeting agenda; and
5. During teleconference meetings, at least a quorum of the members of the local body must participate from locations within the local body’s territorial jurisdiction; and 54953(e) et seq., allows for remote observation and participation in meetings by members of a legislative body and members of the public without compliance with the requirements of Government Code section 54953(b)(3), subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the initial required condition is a declaration of a state of emergency by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act at Government Code section 8625, proclaiming the existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state and within the boundaries of the City, caused by conditions as described in Government Code section 8558; and
WHEREAS, the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency includes area within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e)(3)(A-B) added by AB 361 provides an alternative to having public meetings in accordance with Government Code Section 54953(b)(3) when City Council has reconsidered the circumstances of the COVID-19 state of emergency and that the following circumstances exist:
1. The state of emergency as a result of COVID-19 continues to directly impact the ability of the members of City Council and the members of the City’s Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees to meet safely in person; and
2. The State of California and the County of Madera continue to recommend measures to promote social distancing.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953(e) et seq. further requires that state or local officials have imposed or recommended measures to promote social distancing or the legislative body finds that meeting in person would present an imminent risk to the health or safety of attendees; and
WHEREAS, such conditions now exist in the City in that (i) State and Local officials recommend social distancing measures and (ii) emergency conditions evidenced by COVID-19 and its variants create ongoing COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and deaths and meeting in person would present imminent risk to health or safety of attendees; and WHEREAS, the City Council affirms that it will allow for observation and participation by Council Members as well as Board, Commission, and Standing Committee Members and the public via Zoom in an effort to protect the constitutional and statutory rights of all attendees; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 54953 (e)(3) requires that the City Council review the need and make findings for continuing the teleconferencing as authorized by AB 361 at least once every thirty days until the Governor terminates the state of emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MADERA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The City Council finds that the state of emergency conditions related to COVID- 19 as set forth in the Governor’s and City’s Proclamations of Emergency and are ongoing.
Section 3. The City Council further finds that state and county official recommend social distancing conditions causing imminent risk to attendees as described above exist.
Section 4. The City Council hereby recognizes and affirms the existence and conditions of a state of emergency as proclaimed by the Governor and the City in the City and affirms, authorizes, and proclaims the existence of a local emergency throughout the City.
Section 5. The City Council finds that the state of emergency as a result of COVID-19 continues to directly impact the ability of members of the City Council and the members of the City’s Boards, Commissions, and standing committees to meet safely in person and such fact creates an imminent health risk to such members.
Section 6. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Council and all of the Boards, Commissions, and Standing Committees of City to conduct their meetings without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3), and to instead comply with the remote meeting requirements as authorized by Government Code section 54953(e) et seq.
Section 7. The City Manager and City Clerk are authorized and directed to take all actions reasonably necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution, including, conducting open and public meetings remotely in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e) et seq., and other applicable provisions of the Brown Act, for all City Council meetings, and all Boards, Commissions, and standing committee meetings of the City.
Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall be effective until either (i) February 18, 2022 or (ii) such time as the City Council adopts a Subsequent Resolution in accordance with Government Code section 54953(e)(3) to extend the time during which the City Council and all City legislative bodies may continue to meet remotely, without compliance with Government Code section 54953(b)(3), but otherwise as permitted by Government Code section 54953(e) et seq.
* * *
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
Council Meeting of: January 19, 2022
Agenda Number: ___________
SUBJECT:
Report Regarding Current Elective Mayor Process
RECOMMENDATION:
This report has been prepared at the direction of the City Council. Therefore, there is no staff recommendation provided. Council may consider the report and determine whether or not it wishes to modify or repeal the current process for election of the Mayor at large. The Council may take no action, request further information, or direct City Clerk and City Attorney to return with appropriate action items.
SUMMARY:
The City voters adopted an ordinance on November 2, 2010, providing for the election of six council members by district and the election of mayor on an at-large basis every four years. At the December 15, 2021, City Council (Council) meeting, the Council directed that an item be placed on a Council agenda for possible modification of the manner for selection of Mayor by the Council rather than by election. This report addresses the legal requirements for modification of the Mayor’s selection. In brief, modifying the manner in which the Mayor is elected requires that a ballot measure be submitted to the City voters which would also include the modification of the number of Council districts.
DISCUSSION:
A. STATE LAW.
The mayor of a general law city is usually selected by a vote of the members of the city council per Government Code Section 36801. However, on a vote of its citizens, a general law city may establish a system for direct election of the mayor by the voters. That is what the Madera voters did in 2010. At the same time, the voters approved dividing the City into six districts and electing a council member from each district. Since then, the mayor is elected every four years in a citywide election.
F-1
An elected mayor “is a member of the city council and has all the powers and duties of a member of the city council.” (Gov. Code Section 34903) An elected mayor has the same powers as an appointed mayor. (Gov. Code Section 40601 to 40604)
B. MADERA MUNICIPAL CODE.
The following is pertinent language from the Madera Municipal Code. § 2-1.20 ENUMERATION OF OFFICERS AND TERMS.
The elective officers of the City of Madera shall be a Mayor and six Council members. The Council shall consist of the Mayor and six Council members, each of whom, including the Mayor, shall have the right to vote on all questions coming before the Council. The term of office of the Mayor shall be four years, and the term of office of each Council member shall be four years. § 2-1.21 ESTABLISHMENT OF COUNCIL DISTRICTS.
(A) The districting plan establishing six Council districts shall be approved by the voters of the city at large.
§ 2-1.22 METHOD OF ELECTION.
(A) Mayor. The Mayor shall be elected at the regular municipal election in November of 2012 and every four years thereafter, by the voters of the city at-large, and must reside within the city boundaries. The Mayor shall be elected by the voters of the city at-large.
(B) District Council members. One member of the City Council shall reside in each of the six electoral districts established by §§ 2-1.20 through 2-1.22 and shall be elected by a vote of the voters of that district only. Each district shall elect one Council member.
C. COUNCIL SCENARIOS.
1. Retain Current Process: Under this Scenario, the current process of electing an at-large elective mayor every four years and electing council members by six council districts may continue without further direction or action by the Council.
2. Retain Current Process with Two Year term: Under this Scenario, the at-large elective mayor’s term would be reduced from four years to two years and election of council members by six districts would remain as four years. This Scenario would require that the Council submit a ballot measure to the voters per Government Code Section 34900 which provides:
In cities presently having elected mayors, the city council may also submit to the electors the question of whether the mayor shall thereafter serve a two-year or a four-year term.
3. Repeal Elective Office of Mayor. Under this Scenario, if Council were to direct repeal of the elective office of mayor and reestablishment of selection of the mayor by the Council, the Council would be required to submit a ballot measure to the voters. Government Code section 34902 (b) as follows:
After an office of elective mayor has been established, the city council may subsequently submit to the voters the question of whether or not to eliminate the elective office of mayor and reestablish the selection of the mayor by the city council. If a majority of the votes cast on the proposition are in favor of the elimination of the office of elective mayor, the office shall be eliminated on the expiration date of the incumbent’s term, and on the date the procedure of selection of the mayor by the city council shall be reestablished.
Case law is consistent with the process necessary to change the process. An ordinance, enacted pursuant to the statute providing that a city council may submit to the electorate an ordinance providing for the election of members of the city council by district, may be amended or repealed in the same manner. (Bridges v. City of Wildomar (App. 4 Dist. 2015) 190 Cal.Rptr.3d 253, 238 Cal.App.4th 859)
D. MODIFICATION OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES.
If Council were to pursue Scenario 3, Repeal Elective Office of Mayor, the ballot measure submitted to the voters for amending the process for the Mayor’s selection would also need to include language amending the number of Council districts. Under Government Code 36501, a general law city must have at least five council members. Additionally, state law provides that the number of council member districts must be five, seven, or nine unless there is an elected mayor, in which case the number is four, six, or eight. (Government Code Section 34871 (a) to (d)). For this reason, an ordinance (ballot measure) submitted to the voters to change the selection of the Mayor would also need to include amending the number of Council districts.
E. TIMELINE FOR SUBMITTING BALLOT MEASURE TO VOTERS.
As Council knows, the city like other cities is undergoing a redistricting process as required by federal and state law. Under the Fair Maps Act, that process must be completed by April 17, 2022. If Council were to pursue Scenario 3, there would not be sufficient time to submit a ballot measure to the voters changing the selection of the Mayor and amending the number of council districts as the Elections Code requires lead time for submitting a ballot measure to the votes to ensure the Elections Office is able to undertake all the tasks required for the election.
Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9222, the City Council:
“… may submit to the voters … a proposition for the repeal, amendment, or enactment of any ordinance, to be voted upon at any succeeding regular or special city election, and if the proposition submitted receives a majority of the votes cast on it at the election, the ordinance shall be repealed, amended, or enacted accordingly. A proposition may be submitted, or a special election may be called for the purpose of voting on a proposition, by ordinance or resolution. The election shall be held not less than 88 days after the date of the order of election.” (emphasis added)
The Elections Code in Section 1000 provides:
The established election dates are as follows:
(a) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each even-numbered year that is evenly divisible by four.
(b) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in March of each odd-numbered year. (c) The second Tuesday of April in each even-numbered year. (d) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in June in each even-numbered year that is not evenly divisible by four.
(e) The first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year.
Based on these dates, the two potential election dates are June 7, 2022, an off-schedule election date, and November 8, 2022, a scheduled election date. This is a significant matter and preparation of a ballot measure including preparation of an ordinance will take some time. The deadline for submittal of a ballot measure for a June 7th election is March 11th and the deadline for the November 8th election is August 12th. These dates are based on the Elections Code; however some Election Offices require earlier submittals. We note that the cost of an offschedule election would increase costs considerably, could create confusion with the impending November election, and there would be no practical benefit realized as in either event, state law prohibits the reduction of terms for elected officials. The Mayor would be able to continue and complete his current term in office regardless of when the election is held.
Per the Elections Code, in order to submit a ballot measure to voters at the November 8, 2022, election, the Council would have to adopt the following resolutions:
i. Resolution calling the November 8, 2022, election and submitting the measure to the City voters. This resolution will also require that the ordinance making the proposed changes be included as an attachment. ii. Resolution regarding the filing of direct arguments (in favor and against) concerning the measure, requesting the City Attorney to draft an impartial analysis concerning the measure, and applicable requirements for both such as due dates and word count limits. The Council could also authorize its members to draft direct arguments in this resolution. (Elections Code Sections 9282, 9286, 9287).
iii. Resolution regarding the filing of rebuttal arguments (drafted by the authors of the direct arguments) and applicable requirements such as due dates and word count limits. (Elections Code Section 9285). This resolution is optional pursuant to Elections Code Section 9285(b). Rebuttal arguments would be due 10 days after direct arguments are due. iv. Resolution requesting the County to agree to the consolidation of the City’s election with the Statewide General Election on November 8, 2022. (Elections Code Section 10400 et seq.).
These resolutions (or a combined resolution if authorized by Elections Office) must be adopted and submitted to the County no later than August 12, 2022; however, this date should be verified with the County to ensure that the measure will be on the November 8, 2022, ballot. Additionally, it is recommended that the applicable resolutions and actions should also be completed in advance of the deadline. Further, with respect to the due dates for direct arguments and rebuttal arguments, the due dates must be set such that they are submitted prior to the County’s deadline for such documents.
If the ballot measure were to fail, the status quo would continue with election of the Mayor at large and of council members from six districts. If the ballot measure were to prevail, the Mayor would still complete his unexpired term and the new process would be effective for the November 2024 election.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The City is scheduled to have an election for Districts 1, 3, and 5 on November 8, 2022. A potential ballot would require a vote of all City voters which means the election cost would be greater.
And as noted above, the cost for a June 7, 2022, election would be greater. If the measure were to prevail, there would be other costs for the drawing of new boundaries for the change in Council districts and a demographer firm would need to be retained. The redrawing of boundaries would be similar to the current one for redistricting.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.