Malibu City Council
March 13, 2023

Commission Agenda Report
To: Chair Jennings and Members of the Planning Commission Prepared by: Didier Murillo, Associate Planner
Approved by: Richard Mollica, Planning Director
Date prepared: September 9, 2021 Meeting Date: September 20, 2021 Subject: Coastal Development Permit No. 17-088, Site Plan Review No. 19- 030, Demolition Permit No. 19-023, and Code Violation No. 20-014 – An application for the demolition of an existing single-family residence, and construction of a new two-story, single-family residence and associated development
Location: 6968 Dume Drive, not within the appealable
coastal zone
APN: 4466-015-015
Owner: Highlands Investment Group LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 21-68 (Attachment 1) determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), approving Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 17-088 to allow the demolition of an existing 2,257 square foot, single-story single-family residence, construction of a new 7,472 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 999 square foot basement, swimming pool, onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), associated development, and after-the-fact retaining walls, grading and front yard gates, including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height, up to 28 feet for a pitched roof, and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single-family residence and onsite development located in the Rural Residential-One Acre (RR-1) zoning district at 6968 Dume Drive (Highlands Investment Group LLC).

DISCUSSION: This agenda report provides a project overview, a summary of the project setting and surrounding land uses, a description of the proposed scope, an analysis of the proposed project’s consistency with applicable provisions of the Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), and environmental review pursuant Planning Commission
Meeting
09-20-21
Item

5.C.
47

to CEQA. The analysis and findings contained herein demonstrate the proposed project is consistent with the LCP and MMC.

Pursuant to LCP Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Section 13.13.1, the Planning Director may process this permit application administratively, as an administrative coastal development permit, because the scope of work is for a single-family dwelling and the permit is not appealable to the California Coastal Commission (CCC). However, the Planning Director, with concurrence from the applicant, may process the application as a regular coastal development permit pursuant to LIP Section 13.13.2(B). The applicant has requested that the application be processed as a regular coastal development permit under LIP Section 13.6, subject to the provisions for hearing and appeal set forth in LIP Sections 13.11 and 13.12.

On March 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application and continued this item to a date uncertain to allow the applicant time to redesign and resolve a neighbor dispute. The recitals in the resolution were modified to reflect the continuation of the hearing and the date of tonight’s hearing. The project was redesigned to reorient the attached garage to be west facing, away from the adjacent neighbor’s property, reconfiguring the driveway approach and eliminating the stacked retaining walls which had a combined height of more than 9-feet, previously proposed near the south property line. The more southerly of the staked retaining walls was partially constructed without the benefit of a permit or Planning approvals and is the subject of code enforcement violation.

Project Overview
The subject application proposes the demolition of the existing 1,857 square foot, singlefamily residence, 400 square foot attached garage, and to abandon the existing OWTS.

The application also includes the construction of a new 7,472 square foot two-story, single-family residence with a 999 square foot basement, OWTS, associated development and after-the-fact retaining walls grading and front yard gates. The project plans are included as Attachment 2. This property was not affected by the November 2018 Woolsey Fire.

SPR No. 19-030 has been included to allow for a 28-foot tall, pitched roof. Based on the project plans, story poles (which are still in place), and staff site visits, it was determined that the proposed development is not likely to obstruct primary views of neighboring residences or have a visual impact from public scenic areas and would not adversely affect neighborhood character. While the story poles and orange mesh are partially visible through the dense vegetation between the subject parcel and the neighbor at 6980 Dume Drive, it was not possible to determine whether the portions over 18 feet will obstruct protected views of impressive scenes. The vegetation at 6980 Dume Drive is mature and includes a large California Sycamore tree, a City-protected species, and the other trees appear to be located on slopes steeper than 4 to 1. The neighbor is 48

requesting to delay the project until after fall when the Sycamore tree will lose its leaves.

However, the application has been deemed complete and must be processed based on the current baseline in order to comply with the permit streamlining act. Even if the vegetation were to be removed, staff does not expect that this would reveal an impressive view since much of the area behind the proposed residence has been developed. Furthermore, the surrounding neighborhood includes a mix of single-story and two-story residences.

DP No. 19-023 has also been included as part of the application to allow for the demolition and removal of the existing onsite development.

On June 14, 2019, a code enforcement action was taken on the subject parcel for a new electric front gate, block wall along the side property line, grading, and installation of drainage pipes taking place without the benefit of Planning approvals and building permits. As a result of the work observed on June 14, 2019, Code Violation (CV) No. 20- 014 was added to the subject application. The work described above is included as part of the proposed project and upon approval of the subject application, issuance of building permits, and final inspections of the property, the code enforcement case will be resolved.

Surrounding Land Uses and Project Setting
The subject parcel is located in the Point Dume neighborhood. Surrounding properties along Dume Drive include a mix of one- and two-story, single-family residences zoned RR-1. The subject parcel is a rectangular shaped lot, approximately 1.21 acres in size.

The parcel is zoned RR-1 which allows for residential uses (Figure 1). The parcel is currently developed with an 1,857 square foot, single-story, single-family residence with a 400 square foot attached two-car garage. According to information from the Los Angeles County Assessor records, the existing single-family residence was constructed in 1953.
49

Figure 1 – Aerial Photograph
Source: GovClarity 2021
Development within the Point Dume residential neighborhood is limited to construction on slopes flatter than 4 to 1. The majority of the property is relatively flat with a gentle slope located at the rear of the property. The proposed development will be located on the flat portion of the property. The project site does not contain mapped trails on or adjacent to it according to the LCP Park Lands Map. Additionally, the property is not located in a designated Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) or ESHA buffer as shown on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map.

Table 1 provides a summary of the lot dimensions and lot area of the subject parcel.

Table 1 – Total Property Data
Lot Depth 377 feet, 4 inches
Lot Width 140 feet
Gross Lot Area 52,977 square feet (1.21 acres)
Area Comprised of 1:1 Slopes or Easements 0 square feet Net Lot Area* 52,977 square feet (1.21 acres)
*Net Lot Area = Gross Lot Area minus the area of access easements and 1 to 1 slopes. 50

Table 2 provides a summary of the neighboring surrounding land uses and lot sizes.

Project Description
The proposed scope of work is as follows (Attachment 2 – Projects Plans):

Demolition
 Existing 1,857 square foot, single-family residence;
 Existing 400 square foot, attached garage; and
 Abandon the existing OWTS.

Construction
 A new 7,472 square foot, two-story, single-family residence with an attached threecar garage (6,672 sq. ft. habitable and 800 sq. ft. garage), plus a 999 square foot basement (not included in TDSF)1;
 Two trellised patios totaling 400 square feet and 576 square feet, respectively (not included in TDSF);
 Swimming pool and spa measuring 20 feet wide by 60 feet long;  Associated swimming pool equipment (to be fully screened);  In-ground gas fire pit;
 Trash enclosure outside the required front yard;
 Site fencing and gates;
 New landscaping and hardscaping;
 Grading;
 Retaining walls to not exceed six feet in height; and  Installation of new OWTS.

Additional discretionary requests
 SPR No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height but not to exceed 28 feet for a pitched roof; and
 DP No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage and OWTS.
1 LCP Local Implementation Plan Section 3.6(K)(6) states, the initial 1,000 square feet of a combination of basement and cellar shall not count toward TDSF; additional area in excess of one-thousand (1,000) square feet shall be included in the calculation of TDSF at the rate of one square foot of TDSF for every two square feet of proposed basement/cellar square footage.

Table 2 – Adjacent Land Uses
Address Size Zone Land Use
North 6956 Dume Dr. 1.02 acres RR-1 Single-Family Residence South 6980 Dume Dr. 1.03 acres RR-1 Single-Family Residence West 6969 Dume Dr. 1.03 acres RR-1 Single-Family Residence East 7005 Grasswood Ave. 1.33 acres RR-1 Single-Family Residence 51

Proposed Total Development Square Footage (TDSF)
First Floor (including the attached garage) 5,109 sq. ft.

Second Level 2,363 sq. ft.

Total: 7,472 sq. ft.

LCP Analysis
The LCP consists of the Land Use Plan (LUP) and the LIP. The LUP contains programs and policies implementing the Coastal Act in the City of Malibu. The purpose of the LIP is to carry out the policies of the LUP. The LIP contains specific policies and regulations to which every project requiring a CDP must adhere.

There are 14 LIP chapters that potentially apply depending on the nature and location of the proposed project. Of these, five are for conformance review only and contain no findings: 1) Zoning, 2) Grading, 3) Archaeological/Cultural Resources, 4) Water Quality, and 5) OWTS. These chapters are discussed in the LIP Conformance Analysis section.

The nine remaining LIP chapters contain required findings: 1) Coastal Development Permit; 2) ESHA; 3) Native Tree Protection; 4) Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection; 5) Transfer of Development Credits; 6) Hazards; 7) Shoreline and Bluff Development; 8) Public Access; and 9) Land Division. For the reasons described in this report, including the project site, the scope of work and substantial evidence in the record, only the following chapters and associated are applicable to the project: Coastal Development Permit (including the required findings for the SPR), and Hazards. These chapters are discussed in the LIP Findings section of this report. The findings required by the MMC Section 17.70.060 for the demolition permit are also discussed.

LIP Conformance Analysis
The proposed project has been reviewed by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and the Los Angeles County Waterworks District 29 (WD29) (Attachment 3 – Department Review Sheets). These specialist and agencies found the project, as proposed and conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals and policies with the inclusion of SPR No. 19-030, and DP No. 19-023.

Zoning (LIP Chapter 3)
The proposed project is subject to non-beachfront residential development and design standards set forth under LIP Sections 3.5 and 3.6. Table 3 provides a summary and indicates the proposed project meets those standards, inclusive of the requested SPR and DP.
52

Table 3 – LCP Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/
Required Proposed Comments
SETBACKS (ft.) (Two-story single-family residence with attached garage) Front Yard 65 ft. 112 ft. Complies
Rear Yard 56.6 ft. 192 ft. Complies
Side Yard (Minimum 10%) 14 ft. 16 ft. Complies
Total Side Yard (Cumulative 25%) 35 ft. 37 ft. Complies SETBACKS (ft.) (Swimming pool)
Rear Yard 5 ft. 156 ft. Complies
Side Yard 5 ft. 39 ft. Complies

PARKING
Enclosed 2 3 Complies
Unenclosed 2 2 Complies

TOTAL DEVELOPMENT SQUARE
FOOTAGE 7,503.9 sq. ft. 7,472 sq. ft. Complies
IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE 15,893.1 sq. ft. 8,968 sq. ft. Complies HEIGHT (ft.)
Single-Family Residence 18 ft. 28 ft. (pitched
roof) SPR No. 19-030
Accessory Structures (Trellised
patios ) 18 ft. 13 ft., 9 in. Complies
Basement Ceiling Height 12 ft. 12 ft. Complies
1st Floor x 2/3rd = 2nd Floor (sq. ft.)
+ volume > 18 feet
5,109 sq. ft. x 2/3 =
3,423.03 sq. ft. 2,363 sq. ft. Complies
SITE OF CONSTRUCTION Flatter than 4 to 1 Flatter than 4 to 1 Complies NON-EXEMPT GRADING < 1,000 c.y. 729 c.y. Complies

FENCES/WALLS/HEDGES/GATES
Front Yard
42-inches solid w/
area up to six feet
to remain view
permeable
Six feet to remain
view permeable Complies
Rear Yard 6 ft. None Proposed NA
Side Yard 6 ft. 6 ft. Complies
Because the proposed TDSF is near the limit allowed for the lot size, a condition has been included to note that changing the trellised patios to solid roofs or other such changes that would increase the project TDSF over the maximum would not be allowed without submittal of an application to demonstrate changes to the project comply with the TDSF limits.
53

Grading (LIP Chapter 8)
As summarized in Table 4, the project includes 729 cubic yards of non-exempt grading and 1,334 cubic yards of exempt, understructure grading. As the project proposes less than 1,000 cubic yards of non-exempt grading, the project complies with grading requirements set forth under LIP Section 8.3. The grading that took place and resulted in the June 14, 2019, code enforcement action is included as part of the calculations.

Table 4 – LCP Grading Conformance
Exempt** NonExempt Remedial Total R&R* Understructure Safety Cut 1,442 cy 1,191 cy 0 cy 237 cy 0 cy 2,870 cy
Fill 1,442 cy 143 cy 0 cy 492 cy 0 cy 2,077 cy
Total 2,884 cy 1,334 cy 0 cy 729 cy 0 cy 4,946 cy
Import 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy
Export 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 0 cy 792 cy
*Note: R&R= Removal and Recompaction; cy = cubic yards
**Exempt grading includes all Removal and Recompaction (R&R), understructure and safety grading. Safety grading is the incremental grading required for fire department access (such as turnouts, hammerheads and turnarounds and any other increases in driveway width above 15 feet required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department).

Archaeological / Cultural Resources (LIP Chapter 11)
LIP Chapter 11 requires certain procedures be followed to determine potential impacts on archaeological resources. A Phase I Archaeological Survey was prepared by James J. Schmidt and Gwen Romani of Compass Rose Archaeological, Inc., for the subject property in March 2017. No indication of prehistoric or historic archaeological resources was discovered in the project area. The Compass Rose report determined that any proposed improvements should have no adverse impacts to known cultural resources.

Nevertheless, a condition of approval has been incorporated into the proposed project which states that in the event that potentially important cultural resources be found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. The project has been conditioned to meet this requirement and complies with LIP Chapter 11.

Water Quality (LIP Chapter 17)
The City Public Works Department reviewed and approved the proposed project for conformance to LIP Chapter 17 requirements for water quality protection. A standard condition of approval for this project requires that prior to the issuance of any development permit, a Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan incorporating construction-phase Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Best Management 54

Practices, must be approved by the City Public Works Department. Additionally, the Ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limit have been established by the State Water Resource Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as part of the California Ocean Plan. A standard condition of approval for this project requires that the applicant shall provide a drainage system that addresses ASBS requirements. Furthermore, a Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) is also required and a standard condition of approval has been added. With the implementation of the conditions mentioned above, the proposed project conforms to the water quality protection standards of LIP Chapter 17.

Wastewater Treatment System Standards (LIP Chapter 18)
LIP Chapter 18 addresses OWTS. LIP Section 18.6 includes specific siting, design, and performance requirements. The project includes an OWTS to serve the proposed development, which includes a 3,634-gallon MicroSepTec ES12 with ultraviolet disinfection unit. The OWTS conformance review was completed for six bedrooms and 105 fixture units for the single-family residence. The OWTS has been reviewed by the City Environmental Health Administrator and found to meet the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP. The OWTS has been approved by the City Environmental Health Administrator, having met all applicable requirements.

LIP Findings
A. Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)
LIP Section 13.9 requires that the following four findings be made for all coastal development permits.

Finding 1. That the project as described in the application and accompanying materials, as modified by any conditions of approval, conforms with the certified City of Malibu Local Coastal Program.

The proposed project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses. A single-family residence and associated development are permitted uses. The proposed project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, LACFD, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and WD29. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project conforms to the LCP and MMC in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, with the inclusion of the requested SPR and DP.
55

Finding 2. If the project is located between the first public road and the sea, that the project is in conformity to the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 (commencing with Sections 30200 of the Public Resources Code).

This finding does not apply because the project is not located between the first public road and the sea. However, the subject property does not contain any mapped trails as depicted on the LCP Park Lands Map. The project complies with the access requirements of the Coastal Act.

Finding 3. The project is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

Alternative Project – On May 28, 2020, staff visited the project site to document the story poles erected in 2020 and reviewed alternate site locations for the proposed project.

Staff revisited the site on August 24, 2021, to confirm story poles. The applicant could propose to remodel the existing home and add on additional square footage. Given the age of the existing home it is likely that a remodel and addition would result in alterations to the existing foundation and more than 50 percent of the existing exterior walls resulting in a new (replacement) structure that requires conformance with all current LCP standards. While a remodel that does not propose a new basement would result in less grading, the scope of the project would still result in a new structure and site disturbance.

This alternative also would not meet the property owner’s objectives nor would it address the code enforcement case that is currently pending on the property. A one-story home could also be proposed; however, this would result in a larger footprint on the site and is not necessary since the proposed two-story home is not visible from public scenic viewing areas.

Proposed Project – The proposed project consists of the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage, and abandonment of the existing OWTS.

Construction of a new two-story single-family residence with a basement, attached threecar garage, two trellis-covered patios, swimming pool, spa, site fencing and gates, grading, landscaping, hardscaping, and associated development all of which are all permitted uses within the underlying RR zoning classification. The proposed project will also address the open code enforcement case that is currently pending on the property.

The project also complies with the maximum allowable TDSF, impermeable coverage, two-thirds rule, and setback requirements of the LCP and does not encroach onto slopes steeper than 4 to 1, as required in the Point Dume area. The selected location for the proposed single-family residence and associated development have been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and the LACFD, and the project meets the City’s residential development policies of the LCP and MMC. The proposed development is consistent with existing development in the area and has been determined not to result in adverse impacts. It is not anticipated that a smaller or relocated project would be an environmentally superior alternative. 56

Finding 4. If the project is located in or adjacent to an environmentally sensitive habitat area pursuant to Chapter 4 of the Malibu LIP (ESHA Overlay), that the project conforms with the recommendations of the Environmental Review Board, or if it does not conform with the recommendations, findings explaining why it is not feasible to take the recommended action.

The subject property is not designated as containing ESHA or ESHA buffer as shown on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map. The property is located in the Point Dume area and therefore, ESHA does not apply but the stream ESHA buffer requires no construction on slopes equal to or steeper than 4 to 1. The majority of the property is relatively flat with a gentle slope located at the rear of the property. The proposed development does not encroach onto slopes steeper than 4 to 1, as required in the Point Dume area. Therefore, Environmental Review Board review was not required, and this finding does not apply.

B. Site Plan Review for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section

13.27.5)
LIP Section 13.27.5(A) requires that the City makes four findings in the consideration and approval of a site plan review for construction exceeding the City’s base 18-foot in height limit to a maximum of 24 feet for a flat roof and 28 feet for a pitched roof. Two additional findings are required pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.060. The applicant is requesting SPR No. 19-030 to allow construction of a new two-story single-family residence at a maximum height of 28 feet for a pitched roof. Based on the evidence in the record, the findings of fact for SPR No. 19-030 are made as follows:

Finding 1. The project is consistent with policies and provisions of the Malibu LCP.

As previously discussed in Section A, the project has been reviewed for all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and detailed site investigation, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC.

Finding 2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

SPR No. 19-030 would allow for the construction of a new two-story residence on a lot that is currently developed with a one-story residence constructed in the 1950s. Staff visited the project site on May 28, 2020, photo-documented the story poles and evaluated the project for conformance with applicable development standards. Staff revisited the site on August 24, 2021, to confirm story poles (Attachment 4 – Story Pole Photographs). Neighboring properties located along Dume Drive are developed with a mix of one- and two-story residential structures of similar size with mature landscaping.

As demonstrated with the story pole photographs, due to the location of the proposed development towards the center of the property, the portions of the proposed 57

development over 18 feet in height will have limited visibility from Dume Drive.

Furthermore, the adjacent neighbor located at 6980 Dume Drive requested staff to evaluate potential view impacts of the Santa Monica Mountains. Staff conducted a site visit and, based on the pictures taken, the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height are not expected to block views of any impressive scenes of the Santa Monica mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines. Based on existing nearby development, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment and is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. Therefore, the portions of the structures in excess of 18 feet are not anticipated to adversely affect neighborhood character.

Finding 3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP.

On May 28, 2020, staff visited the subject parcel and, on August 24, 2021, revisited to view the story poles and surrounding neighborhood. Based on these site visits, staff determined that the proposed residence will not be visible from scenic areas or scenic roads. The proposed residence is not expected to create obstructions or encroachments into public views and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

Finding 4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law, and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits and licenses from the City of Malibu and other related agencies.

Finding 5. The project is consistent with the City's general plan and local coastal program.

The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use. The proposed project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan and LCP. The goals and policies of the General Plan intend to maintain rural residential character in this area, and all components of the project are consistent with these goals. The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that it conforms to the residential land use designation and all applicable development standards.
58

Finding 6. The portion of the project that is in excess of 18 feet in height does not obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17).

Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, story poles, and site visits), staff has determined that the proposed construction above 18-feet in height is not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). Furthermore, staff conducted a couple of remote meetings with the adjacent neighbor (6980 Dume Drive) to discuss the project. The most recent in-person meeting took place, on August 24, 2021, to discuss the project revisions and potential view impacts. The adjacent neighbor continues to express concerns with the location of the development, particularly potential impacts to his view of the Santa Monica Mountains. The concerns were provided to the project applicant. However, based on staff’s inspections and present site conditions, the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height do not affect this neighbor’s views of impressive scenes.

C. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Overlay (LIP Chapter 4) The subject property is not in a designated ESHA, or ESHA buffer, as shown on the LCP ESHA and Marine Resources Map. Therefore, the findings of LIP Section 4.7.6 are not applicable.

D. Native Tree Protection (LIP Chapter 5)
There are no native trees on or adjacent to the subject lot. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 5 do not apply.

E. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6) The Scenic, Visual, and Hillside Resource Protection Chapter governs those coastal development permit applications concerning any parcel of land that is located along, within, provides views to or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area. The subject property is not located along, within, nor provides views to or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area. Therefore, the findings LIP Chapter 6 are not applicable.

F. Transfer of Development Credit (LIP Chapter 7)
The proposed project does not include a land division or multi-family development.

Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 7 are not applicable. 59

G. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
Pursuant to LIP Section 9.3, written findings of fact, analysis and conclusions addressing geologic, flood and fire hazards, structural integrity or other potential hazards listed in LIP Sections 9.2(A) must be included in support of all approvals, denials or conditional approvals of development located on a site or in an area where it is determined that the proposed project has the potential to create adverse impacts upon site stability or structural integrity.

The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 and has been reviewed by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and the LACFD. The required findings are made as follows:

Finding 1. The project, as proposed will neither be subject to nor increase instability of the site or structural integrity from geologic, flood, or fire hazards due to project design, location on the site or other reasons.

The analysis for potential hazards included review of the submitted geotechnical reports prepared by Alpine Geotechnical, Inc., dated July 12, 2017, November 20, 2017 and December 7, 2017; and Septic Plot Plan prepared by Alpine Geotechnical, Inc., dated July 2017, which are on file with the City. According to the geotechnical reports, the proposed development was determined to not increase instability of the site or structural integrity from a geologic, flood or fire hazards perspective. It has been determined that the project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the project site is located within an extreme fire hazard area. Based on review of the project plans and by City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department and LACFD, these specialists determined that adverse impacts to the project site related to the proposed development are not expected. The proposed project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability from geologic, flood, or fire hazards.

In summary, the proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

All recommendations of the City geotechnical staff and City Public Works Department shall be incorporated into the final design and construction, including foundations and grading. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical staff and City Public Works Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

Fire Hazard
The entire city limits of Malibu are within an identified fire hazard zone. The subject property is currently subject to wildfire and development on the subject property will not increase the site’s susceptibility to wildfire. The scope of work proposed as part of this 60

application is not expected to have an impact on wildfire hazards. The proposed development may decrease the site’s susceptibility to wildfire through the use of appropriate building materials during construction.

The City is served by the LACFD, as well as the California Department of Forestry, if needed. In the event of major fires, the County has “mutual aid agreements” with cities and counties throughout the State so that additional personnel and firefighting equipment can augment the LACFD. Conditions of approval have been included in the resolution to require compliance with all LACFD development standards. As such, the proposed project, as designed, constructed, and conditioned, will not be subject to nor increase the instability of the site or structural integrity involving wildfire hazards.

Finding 2. The project, as conditioned, will not have significant adverse impacts on site stability or structural integrity from geologic, flood or fire hazards due to required project modifications, landscaping or other conditions.

As previously discussed in Finding 1, the project, as designed, conditioned and approved by the applicable departments and agencies, will not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or flood hazards due to the project design.

Finding 3. The project, as proposed or as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

As previously discussed in Section A, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

Finding 4. There are no alternatives to development that would avoid or substantially lessen impacts on site stability or structural integrity.

The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department and LACFD. These specialist and agency determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity. As previously discussed in Section A, there are no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would result in less site disturbance.

Finding 5. Development in a specific location on the site may have adverse impacts but will eliminate, minimize or otherwise contribute to conformance to sensitive resource protection policies contained in the certified Malibu LCP.

As previously discussed in Section A, the proposed project, as designed and conditioned, is not expected to have adverse impacts on sensitive resources. 61

H. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)
The project site is not located on or along the shoreline, a coastal bluff or bluff top fronting the shoreline. The subject parcel is located on the seaward side of PCH but is separated from the bluff top by multiple properties. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 10 are not applicable.

I. Public Access (LIP Chapter 12)
LIP Section 12.4 requires public access for lateral, bluff-top, and vertical access near the ocean, trails, and recreational access for the following cases:

A. New development on any parcel or location specifically identified in the Land Use Plan or in the LCP zoning districts as appropriate for or containing a historically used or suitable public access trail or pathway.

B. New development between the nearest public roadway and the sea.

C. New development on any site where there is substantial evidence of a public right of access to or along the sea or public tidelands, a blufftop trail or an inland trail acquired through use or a public right of access through legislative authorization.

D. New development on any site where a trail, bluff top access or other recreational access is necessary to mitigate impacts of the development on public access where there is no feasible, less environmentally damaging, project alternative that would avoid impacts to public access.

As described herein, the subject property and the proposed project do not meet any of these criteria in that no trails are identified on the LCP Park Lands Map on or adjacent to the property, and the property is not located on a bluff or near a recreational area.

Therefore, the project conforms to LIP Chapter 12 and further findings need not be made.

J. Land Division (LIP Chapter 15)
This project does not include a land division. Therefore, the findings of LIP Chapter 15 are not applicable.

K. Demolition Permit Findings (MMC Chapter 17.70)
MMC Section 17.70.060 requires that a demolition permit be issued for projects that result in the demolition of any building or structure. The project includes the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage, and abandon the existing OWTS.

Therefore, the findings for DP No. 19-023 are made as follows:

Finding 1. The demolition permit is conditioned to assure that it will be conducted in a manner that will not create significant adverse environmental impacts. 62

The proposed project includes the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage, and abandonment of the existing OWTS. Conditions of approval, including the recycling of demolished materials, have been included to ensure that the proposed project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts.

Finding 2. A development plan has been approved or the requirement waived by the City.

This CDP application is being processed concurrently with DP No. 19-023, and approval of the demolition permit is subject to the approval of CDP No. 17-088.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Department has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Department found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 (l) – Existing Facilities and 15303 (a) and (e) – New Construction. The Planning Department has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

CORRESPONDENCE: On March 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application and continued this item to a date uncertain to allow the applicant time to redesign and resolve a neighbor dispute that arose prior to the hearing date. The project was redesigned to reorient the attached garage to be west facing, away from the adjacent neighbor’s property, reconfiguring the driveway approach and eliminating the stacked retaining walls which had a combined height of more than 9 feet, which were previously proposed near the south property line. The more southerly of the staked retaining walls was partially constructed without the benefit of a permit or Planning approvals and is the subject of Code Enforcement action.

Furthermore, staff conducted a couple of remote meetings with the adjacent neighbor (6980 Dume Drive) to discuss the project. The most recent in-person meeting took place, on August 24, 2021, to discuss the project revisions and potential view impacts. The adjacent neighbor continues to express concerns with the location of the development, particularly potential impacts to his view of the Santa Monica Mountains. During the site visit, staff took pictures. Based on the pictures taken, staff determined that existing dense, mature vegetation will obstruct most of the proposed development and the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height do not currently or are expected (should some landscaping be removed) to block views of any impressive scenes of the Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines. The concerns were shared with the project applicant.
63

PUBLIC NOTICE: On August 26, 2021, staff published a Notice of Public Hearing Notice in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and mailed the notice to property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property (Attachment 5).

SUMMARY: The required findings can be made that the project complies with the LCP.

Further, the Planning Department’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Based on the analysis contained in this report and the accompanying resolution, staff recommends approval of this project subject to the conditions of approval contained in Section 5 (Conditions of Approval) of Planning Commission Resolution No. 21-68. The project has been reviewed and conditionally approved for conformance with the LCP by Planning Department staff and appropriate City and County departments
ATTACHMENTS:

1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 21-68

2. Project Plans

3. Department Review Sheets

4. Story Pole Photographs

5. Public Hearing Notice
64 ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 21-68

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

MALIBU, DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 17-088 TO ALLOW FOR THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING 2,257 SQUARE FOOT, SINGLESTORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 7,472 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A 999 SQUARE FOOT BASEMENT, SWIMMING POOL, ONSITE

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMEN, AND

AFTER-THE-FACT RETAINING WALLS, GRADING, AND FRONT YARD GATES, INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 19-030 FOR CONSTRUCTION IN EXCESS OF 18 FEET IN HEIGHT, UP TO 28 FEET FOR A PITCHED ROOF, AND DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 19-023 FOR THE DEMOLITION

OF THE EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONSITE

DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE ACRE
ZONING DISTRICT AT 6968 DUME DRIVE (HIGHLANDS INVESTMENT

GROUP LLC)
The Planning Commission of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On September 13, 2017, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 17-088 was submitted to the Planning Department by applicant, Burdge and Associates, on behalf of the property owners, Valley Executive Telecom Trust. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.

B. On April 30, 2019, staff deemed the project complete.

C. On June 14, 2019, a Code Enforcement action was taken on the property for a new electric front gate, block wall along the side property line, grading and drainage pipes being constructed without the benefit of planning approval and building permits. Code Violation (CV) No. 20-014 was added to the subject application.

D. On March 27, 2020, the applicant submitted revised plans to the Planning Department.

E. On May 28, 2020, Planning Department staff conducted a site visit to document story poles, site conditions, and surrounding area.

F. On May 29, 2020, an updated grant deed was submitted by the applicant for the new property owners, Highlands Investment Group, LLC.

G. On June 16, 2020, the applicant posted a Notice of Coastal Development Permit Application on the subject property.

H. On June 25, 2020, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

DRAFT 65
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
I. On July 20, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to a date uncertain at the applicant’s request.

J. On January 7, 2021, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

K. On February 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to the March 1, 2021 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant’s request.

L. On March 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to a date uncertain at the applicant’s request.

M. On August 26, 2021, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

N. On September 20, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Commission found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(l)(1) – Existing Facilities and 15303(a) and (e) – New Construction. The Planning Commission has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on substantial evidence contained within the record and pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) including Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9, the Planning Commission adopts the analysis in the agenda report, incorporated herein, the findings of fact below, and approves CDP No. 17-088 to allow for the demolition of an existing 2,257 square foot, single-story single-family residence, construction of a new 7,472 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 999 square foot basement, swimming pool, onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), associated development, and after-the-fact retaining walls, grading and front yard gates, including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height, up to 28 feet for a pitched roof, and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing singlefamily residence and onsite development located in the Rural Residential One-Acre (RR-1) zoning district located at 6968 Dume Drive.

DRAFT 66
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment system standards requirements. With the inclusion of the proposed SPR and DP, the project, as conditioned, has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. The proposed project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses. A single-family residence and associated development are permitted uses. The proposed project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, LACFD, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and WD29. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project conforms to the LCP and MMC in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, with the inclusion of the requested SPR and DP.

2. The proposed project meets the development policies of the LCP and MMC, with the inclusion of the SPR and MM and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. Therefore, the proposed project has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

B. Site Plan Review for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27.5) SPR No. 19-030 from the development standards contained in LIP Section 13.27 will allow construction of a single-family residence over 18 feet in height at a maximum height of 28 feet for a pitched roof.

1. The project has been reviewed for conformance with all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and a detailed site investigation, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC.

2. SPR No. 19-030 would allow for the construction of a new two-story residence on a lot that is currently developed with a one-story residence constructed in the 1950s. Staff visited the project site on May 28, 2020, photo-documented the story poles and evaluated the project for conformance with applicable development standards. Staff revisited the site on August 24, 2021, to confirm story poles. Neighboring properties located along Dume Drive are developed with a mix of one- and two-story residential structures of similar size with mature landscaping. As demonstrated with the story pole photographs, due to the location of the proposed development towards the center of the property, the portions of the proposed development over 18 feet in height will have limited visibility from Dume Drive. Furthermore, the adjacent neighbor located at 6980 Dume Drive requested staff to evaluate potential view impacts of the Santa Monica Mountains. Staff conducted a site visit and, based on the pictures taken, the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height are not expected to block views of any impressive scenes of the Santa Monica mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines. Based on existing nearby development, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment and is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. Therefore, the portions of the structures in excess of 18 feet are not anticipated to adversely affect neighborhood character.

DRAFT 67
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

3. On May 28, 2020, staff visited the subject parcel and, on August 24, 2021, revisited to view the story poles and surrounding neighborhood. Based on these site visits, staff determined that the proposed residence will not be visible from scenic areas or scenic roads. The proposed residence is not expected to create obstructions or encroachments into public views and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law, and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits and licenses from the City of Malibu and other related agencies.

5. The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use. The proposed project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan and LCP. The goals and policies of the General Plan intend to maintain rural residential character in this area, and all components of the project are consistent with these goals.

The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that it conforms to the residential land use designation and all applicable development standards.

6. Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, story poles, and site visits), staff has determined that the proposed construction above 18-feet in height is not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). Furthermore, staff conducted a couple of remote meetings with the adjacent neighbor (6980 Dume Drive) to discuss the project. The most recent inperson meeting took place, on August 24, 2021, to discuss the project revisions and potential view impacts. The adjacent neighbor continues to express concerns with the location of the development, particularly potential impacts to his view of the Santa Monica Mountains. The concerns were provided to the project applicant. However, based on staff’s inspections and present site conditions, the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height do not affect this neighbor’s views of impressive scenes.

C. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability of the site from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

2. The project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by the City geotechnical staff and the City Public Works Department, does not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or fire hazards due to the project design.

3. The project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and LACFD. These specialists and agency determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity. There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would result in less site disturbance.

DRAFT 68
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

5. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources.

D. Demolition Permit Findings (MMC Chapter 17.70)

1. The proposed project includes the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage, and abandonment of the existing OWTS. Conditions of approval, including the recycling of demolished materials, have been included to ensure that the proposed project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts.

2. This CDP application is being processed concurrently with DP No. 19-023, and approval of the demolition permit is subject to the approval of CDP No. 17-088.

SECTION 4. Planning Commission Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. 17-088, SPR No. 19-030, and DP No. 19-023, subject to the following conditions.

SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval.

1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemnify and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City's actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor of any person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity of any of the City's actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City’s expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City’s actions concerning this project.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the project described herein. The scope of work approved includes:
a. Demolition of the existing 1,857 square foot, single-family residence; b. Demolition the existing 400 square foot, attached garage; c. Abandon the existing OWTS;
d. A new 7,472 square foot two-story single-family residence with attached three-car garage (6,672 sq. ft. habitable and 800 sq. ft. garage), plus a 999 square foot basement (not included in TDSF);
e. Two trellised patios totaling 400 square feet and 576 square feet, respectively (not included in TDSF);
f. Swimming pool and spa measuring 20 feet wide by 60 feet long; g. Associated pool and spa equipment (to be fully screened); h. In-ground gas fire pit;
i. Trash enclosure outside the required front yard;
j. Site fencing and gates;
k. New landscaping and hardscaping;
l. Grading;
m. Retaining walls to not exceed six feet in height; and n. Installation of new OWTS.

DRAFT 69
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
o. Discretionary Requests:
i. SPR No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height but to exceed 28 feet for a pitched roof; and
ii. DP No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage and OWTS.

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition No. 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department date stamped July 28, 2021. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs, notarizes and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions of approval set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans, including the items required in Conditions No. 6 to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. This resolution, signed and notarized Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit, major remodel policy and signed agreement (if applicable) and all Department Review Sheets attached to the agenda report for this project shall be copied in their entirety and placed directly onto a separate plan sheet behind the cover sheet of the development plans submitted to the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department for plan check, and the City of Malibu Public Works Department for an encroachment permit (as applicable).

7. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit, unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decisionmaking body or withdrawn by the appellant.

8. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

9. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Coastal Engineer, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

10. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the Malibu Municipal Code and the Local Coastal DRAFT 70
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
Program. Revised plans reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.

11. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals have been exhausted.

12. The property owner must submit payment for all outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

Cultural Resources

13. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

14. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease, and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

15. Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
a. Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60- watt incandescent bulb);
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

16. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

17. No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one-foot candle.

DRAFT 71
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

18. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting of the shore is prohibited.

19. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

20. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

21. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.

Fencing/Walls/Screening

22. The height of fences and walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.

23. Any above-ground equipment shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

Site-Specific Conditions

24. No exterior lighting is proposed as part of this project; therefore, no new exterior lighting is permitted as part of this project.

25. The project as approved is near the maximum TDSF allowed for the subject parcel.

Converting the trellis covered roofs or any other changes that would increase TDSF over the maximum allowed shall not be permitted unless an appropriate application is submitted to the Planning Department and the Planning Director confirms that these changes to the project comply with applicable TDSF standards.

Demolition/Solid Waste

26. Prior to demolition activities, the applicant shall receive Planning Department approval for compliance with conditions of approval.

27. The applicant/property owner shall contract with a City approved hauler to facilitate the recycling of all recoverable/recyclable material. Recoverable material shall include but shall not be limited to: asphalt, dirt and earthen material, lumber, concrete, glass, metals, and drywall.

28. Prior to the issuance of a building/demolition permit, an Affidavit and Certification to implement waste reduction and recycling shall be signed by the Owner or Contractor and submitted to the Environmental Sustainability Department. The Affidavit shall indicate the agreement of the applicant to divert at least 65 percent (in accordance with CalGreen) of all construction waste from the landfill.

29. Upon plan check approval of demolition plans, the applicant shall secure a demolition permit from the City. The applicant shall comply with all conditions related to demolition imposed DRAFT 72
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
by the Building Official.

30. No demolition permit shall be issued until building permits are approved for issuance.

Demolition of the existing structure and initiation of reconstruction must take place within a six-month period. Dust control measures must be in place if construction does not commence within 30 days.

31. The project developer shall utilize licensed subcontractors and ensure that all asbestoscontaining materials and lead-based paints encountered during demolition activities are removed, transported, and disposed of in full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations.

32. Any building or demolition permits issued for work commenced or completed without the benefit of required permits are subject to appropriate Investigation Fees as required in the Building Code.

33. Upon completion of demolition activities, the applicant shall request a final inspection by the Building Safety Division.

Construction / Framing

34. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy of the Construction Management Plan. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers, not within the public right of way.

35. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to plan check submittal.

36. When framing is complete, a site survey shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or architect that states the finished ground level elevation and the highest roof member elevation. Prior to the commencement of further construction activities, said document shall be submitted to the assigned Building Inspector and Planning Department for review and sign off on framing.

37. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.

38. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount of equipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessary; and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.

39. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control the volume, velocity and pollutant load of storm water runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter 17, including:

DRAFT 73
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.

40. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department of Transportation.

Color and Materials

41. Every residence shall have an exterior siding of brick, wood, stucco, metal, concrete or other similar material, except that reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type metal siding is prohibited.

Biology/Landscaping

42. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.

Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.

43. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

44. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner /applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.

45. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition serving the same function as a fence or wall (also known as a hedge) located within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of six feet. A hedge located within the front yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of 42 inches. Three violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.

46. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

47. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

DRAFT 74
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

48. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

49. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote or copper arsenate.

50. Any site preparation activities, including removal of vegetation, between February 1 and September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist at least five days prior to initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of nesting bird surveys shall be submitted to the City within two business days of completing the surveys.

51. Up-lighting of landscaping is prohibited.

52. Use of wood chips and shredded rubber is prohibited anywhere on the site. Flammable mulch material, including shredded bark, pine needles, and artificial turf, are prohibited between zero and five feet of a structure. Non-continuous use of flammable mulch (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) is allowed between 5 and 30 feet from the eave/overhang of a structure with limited application areas. Any mulch materials (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) are allowed 30 feet or more from a structure with no limitation on application area.

Public Works

53. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department prior to the commencement of any work within the public right-of-way. The driveway shall be constructed of either six inches of concrete over four inches of aggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

54. Several existing private improvements are located within the public right-of-way, such as (but not limited to) landscaping, railroad ties, and fencing. These improvements are required to be removed as part of this project and must be shown on the plans. The applicant / property owner shall place notes on the development plans for the removal of existing encroachments within the public right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the removal of the private improvements within the public right-of-way.

55. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4 to 1.

Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4 to 1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading DRAFT 75
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

56. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the Los Angeles County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with LIP Section 8.3.

57. A grading and drainage plan containing the following information shall be approved, and submitted to the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project:
a. Public Works Department general notes;
b. The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks); c. The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated and a total area shall be shown on this plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated;
d. The limits to land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated and a total area of disturbance should be shown on this plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading shall be included within the area delineated; e. If the property contains rare, endangered or special status species as identified in the Biological Assessment, this plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on this plan is required by the City Biologist;
f. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses and over excavations for fill slopes; and
g. Private storm drain systems shall be shown on this plan. Systems greater than 12 inch in diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with this plan.
h. Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

58. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, post-construction BMPs and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

59. The applicant shall label all City/County storm drain inlets within 250 feet from each property line per the City of Malibu’s standard label template. A note shall be placed on the project plans that address this condition.

60. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as DRAFT 76
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
part of the California Ocean Plan. This designation prohibits the discharge of any waste, including stormwater runoff, directly into the ASBS. The applicant shall provide a drainage system that accomplishes the following:
a. Installation of BMPs that are designed to treat the potential pollutants in the stormwater runoff so that it does not alter the natural ocean water quality. These pollutants include trash, oil and grease, metals, bacteria, nutrients, pesticides, herbicides and sediment.
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.

61. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuance of grading/building permits. This plan shall include and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but not limited to:

Erosion Controls Scheduling Erosion Controls Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation
Sediment Controls
Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
All Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

62. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The SWMP shall be prepared in accordance with the LIP Section

17.3.2 and all other applicable ordinances and regulations. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the pre-development and post-development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the site design and source control BMPs that have been implemented in the design of the project. The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading or building permit for this project.

DRAFT 77
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

63. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage on the site. The QQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
a. Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs):
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofitrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
f. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
g. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

64. The developer’s consulting engineer shall sign the final plans prior to the issuance of permits.

Geology

65. All recommendations of the consulting certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer and/or the City Geologist shall be incorporated into all final design and construction including foundations, grading, sewage disposal, and drainage. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical staff prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

66. Final plans approved by the City Geologist shall be in substantial conformance with the approved CDP relative to construction, grading, sewage disposal and drainage. Any substantial changes may require a CDP amendment or a new CDP.

DRAFT 78
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
Swimming Pool / Spa

67. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

68. Pool and air conditioning equipment that will be installed shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section

3.5.3(A).

69. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

70. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, algaecides, or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach in to the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries).

71. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

72. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section 13.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.

Environmental Health

73. Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11 inch by 17 inch sheet leaving a five inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

74. A final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components (i.e., alarm system, pumps, timers, flow equalization devices, backflow devices, etc.) proposed for use in the construction of the proposed OWTS. For all OWTS, final reports must be signed by a City registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by a California Geologist. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s wet signature, professional registration number and stamp (if applicable).

DRAFT 79
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

75. The final design report shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems. The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design; b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment.

State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems; d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day.

Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics; and
e. All final design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note:

For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by the Building Safety Division and/or the Planning Department.

76. Final plans shall clearly show the locations of all existing OWTS components (serving preexisting development) to be abandoned and provide procedures for the OWTS’ proper abandonment in conformance with the MMC.

77. The following note shall be added to the plan drawings included with the OWTS final design: “Prior to commencing work to abandon, remove, or replace the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) components, an ‘OWTS Abandonment Permit’ shall be obtained from the City of Malibu. All work performed in the OWTS abandonment, removal or replacement area shall be performed in strict accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental and occupational safety and health regulatory requirements. The obtainment of any such required permits or approvals for this scope of DRAFT 80
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
work shall be the responsibility of the applicant and their agents.”

78. All project architectural plans and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted for Environmental Health review and approval. The floor plans must show all drainage fixtures, including in the kitchen and laundry areas. These plans must be approved by the Building Safety Division prior to receiving Environmental Health final approval.

79. Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

80. An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed OWTS.

81. A maintenance contract executed between the owner of the subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed onsite wastewater disposal system after construction shall be submitted. Please note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable.

82. Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the City of Malibu Recorder’s Office. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of MMC. Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator.

83. Project geologist/geotechnical consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

84. City geotechnical staff final approval shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.

85. Planning department final approval of OWTS plans shall be obtained.

86. In accordance with MMC Chapter 15.44, prior to Environmental Health approval, an application shall be made to the Environmental Sustainability Department for an OWTS operating permit.

Prior to Occupancy

87. Prior to, or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner / applicant shall submit to the Planning Department the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation signed off by the Building Safety Division.

88. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department. Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.

DRAFT 81
Resolution No 21-68

______________________

89. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all Planning Department conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.

90. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Environmental and Sustainability Department. A final approval shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this CDP.

91. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Fixed Conditions

92. This coastal development permit shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.

93. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under.

Deed Restrictions

94. The property owner is required to execute and record a deed restriction which shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs and expenses of liability arising out of the acquisition, design, construction, operation, maintenance, existence or failure of the permitted project in an area where an extraordinary potential for damage or destruction from wildfire exists as an inherent risk to life and property. The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to Planning Department staff prior to final Planning Department approval.

SECTION 6. The Planning Commission shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of September 2021. ___________________________________________
JEFFREY JENNINGS, Planning Commission Chair
ATTEST:
____________________________________
PATRICIA SALAZAR, Recording Secretary
DRAFT 82
Resolution No 21-68

______________________
LOCAL APPEAL - Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20.1 (Local Appeals), a decision made by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council.

Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org, in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 245.

I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 21-68 was passed and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Malibu at the regular meeting held on the 20th day of September 2021 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________________
PATRICIA SALAZAR, Recording Secretary
DRAFT 83
GSPublisherVersion 0.13.100.42

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/derrickdavis/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968_v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 3/26/21D.W.B.,
T-1.1

COVER SHEET/PROJECT INDEX
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
RM #
1 2
3 4
SHEET #
DETAIL #
PLAN
NORTH
SHEET #
DETAIL #

DOOR ID
WDW ID
EE
DETAIL #
SHEET#
ID
SHEET
(TYP.) VIEW

INDICATOR
TYP. DOOR SCHEDULE SYMB.

TYP. WINDOW SCHEDULE SYMB.

ELEVATION DATUM

BUILDING ELEVATION/

SECTION

WALL SECTION

INTERIOR ELEVATION FLAG
TYP. ELEVATION VIEW

DETAIL CALL OUT
GRID LINE SYMB.

WOOD FRAME

CONCRETE
CMU
STONE

TRUE NORTH ARROW
TYP. PLAN VIEW

DETAIL CALL OUT
1 HR. FIRE RATED

CONSTRUCTION

NORTH ARROW
TN

EMERGENCY EGRESS

PROJECT LOCATION
•2020 County of Los Angeles Building Code•2020 County of Los Angeles Mechanical Code•2020 County of Los Angeles Plumbing Code•2020 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code•2019 California Energy Code•2019 California Residential Code•2019 Residential Building Energy Efficiency Standards•APPLICABLE CODES: - Project shall comply with Title 24 and 2019 California Residential Code(CRC), California Mechanical Code (CMC), California Plumbing Code (CPC),California Electrical Code (CEC), and California Energy Code (CEnC) [§R106.1.1 CRC]

ADDITIONALADJUSTABLEABOVE FINISHED FLOORABOVE RAISED FLOORAIR CONDITIONINGALTERNATEARCHITECT (URAL)AREA DRAINBLOCKINGBOARDBUILDINGCABINETCEILINGCENTERCENTER LINECERAMIC TILECLEARCONCRETECONCRETE MASONRY UNITCONSTRUCTIONCONTINUOUSCONTROL JOINTDIAMETERDIMENSIONDOUBLEDOUBLE HUNGDOWNDRAWINGELECTRICELECTRIC PANELELEVATORENCLOSUREENGINEEREQUALEQUIPMENTEXISTINGEXTRUDE OR EXTRUSIONFABRICATE(ED)FINISHFIXTUREFLOORFLUORESCENTFOOTFRESH AIR INTAKE (OR INLET)FURNISH(ED)FURRINGGALVANIZEDGAUGEGROUNDGYPSUM BOARDHEIGHTHOLLOW METALHORIZONTALHOT WATERINSIDE DIAMETER ADD'L.ADJ.A.F.F.A.R.F.A/CALT.ARCH.A.D.BLKG.BD.BLDG.CAB.CLG.CTR.C.L.C.T.CLR.CONC.C.M.U.CONST.CONT.C.J.D.I.A..DIM.DBL.D.H.DN.DWG.ELECT.ELECT. PNL.ELEV.ENCL.ENGR.EQ.EQUIP.EXIST.EXTR.FAB.FIN.FIXT.FL.FLUOR.FT.F.A.I.FURN.FUR.GALV.GA.GRND.GYP. BD.HT.H.M.HORIZ.H.W.I.D.

JOINTMANUFACTUREMANUFACTURER'SMATERIALMAXIMUMMECHANICALMETALMINIMUMMISCELLANEOUSNORTHNOT IN CONTRACTNOT TO SCALENUMBERON CENTEROUTSIDE DIAMETEROPENINGPAIRPERFORATED(ED)PIECE/PIECESPLANTER AREAQUANTITYRADIUSREFERENCEREFRIGERATORREINFORCE/REINFORCINGREQUIREDRETURN AIRROUGH OPENINGSHEETSIMILARSOUTHSMOKE DETECTORSPEAKERSPECIFICATIONSSPRINKLER HEADSQUARESTAINLESS STEELSTANDARDSTEELSTRUCTURALTELEPHONETELEVISIONTEMPORARYTONGUE AND GROOVE

TYPICALUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDVERTICALVINYL COMPOSITION TILEWITHWITHOUTWOOD JT.MFR.MFR'S.MATL.MAX.MECH.MTL.MIN.MISC.NN.I.C.N.T.S.NO. OR #O.C.O.D.OPG.PR.PERF.PC./PCS.P.A.QTY.RAD.REF.REFRIG.REINF.REQ.R.A.R.O.SHT.SIM.SS.D.SPKR.SPECS.S.H.SQ.S.S.STD.STL.STRUCT.TEL.TVTEMP.T. & G.TYP.U.O.N.VERT.V.C.T.W/W/OWD.

ABBREVIATIONS VICINITY MAP

PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT DATA

SHEET INDEX

MALIBU, CA
MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE:21,780 x .177 = 3,855 + 1000 = 4,855.0 Sq.Ft.43,560 - 21,780 = 21,780 x .10 = 2,178.0 Sq.Ft.52,977 - 43,560 = 9,417 x .05 = 470.9 Sq.Ft. Total= 7,503.9 Sq.Ft.

GENERALT-1.1 COVER SHEETT-1.2 SURVEYARCHITECTURALA-0.1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN & GATE PLANA-1.1 PROPOSED BASEMENT PLANA-1.2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANA-1.3 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLANA-1.4 PROPOSED ROOF PLANA-1.5 PROPOSED PAVILIONSA-2.1 PROPOSED MAIN HOUSE ELEVATIONSA-2.2 PROPOSED MAIN HOUSE ELEVATIONSA-3.1 PROPOSED SECTIONS

APPLICABLE CODES
SCOPE OF WORK: - COMPLY WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT - NEW GATE AND PILASTER DESIGN - NEW GRADING - NEW DRAINAGE - NEW BLOCK WALL

SYMBOL LEGEND
MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE:52,977 x 30% = 15,893.1 Sq.Ft.

EXISTING IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE:

EXISTING PROPOSED
BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2,972 Sq.Ft. 5,509 Sq.Ft.DRIVEWAY 3,460 Sq.Ft. WALKWAYS, STAIRS & MISC. HARDSCAPE 2,566 Sq.Ft. 3,459 Sq.Ft. Total Impermeable Coverage 8,998 Sq.Ft. 8,968 Sq.Ft. < 15,893.1 Sq.Ft. •Occ.Group: R3/U
•Type of Construction: VB•Fire Zone: VHSFHZ•Number of Stories: 2 W/ Basement•Sprinkled: Yes•Zone: RR1

THE WARLEY AVENUE

TRUST RESIDENCE
MARCH, 2021
•Address: 6968 DUME DR
Malibu, CA 90265
•Owner: THE WARLEY AVENUE TRUST•Legal Descr.: SEE SURVEY•A.P.N: 4466-015-015•Lot Size: Gross Lot Area: 52,977 SQFT (1.22 Ac ) OWNER:The Warley Avenue Trust9100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 100wBeverly Hills, CA 90212ARCHITECT:Burdge & Associates Architects, Inc.Douglas W. Burdge, A.I.A.24911 Pacific Coast HwyMalibu, CA 90265Tel: 310-456-5905Fax: 310-456-2467DESIGNER:Saffron Case Homes6674 Arizona CircleLos Angeles, CA 90045Tel: 917-913-1012 SURVEYOR:Land & Air Surveying, Inc.22741 Pacific Coast Highway Suite #400AMalibu, CA 90265Tel: 310-456-9381Fax: 310-456-9821GEOLOGY:Alpine GeologyMike Leary1358 Tower SQ, Suite 1Ventura, CA 93003Tel: 805-658-9000SEPTIC:Alpine GeologyMike Leary1358 Tower SQ, Suite 1Ventura, CA 93003Tel: 805-658-9000 EXISTING SQUARE FOOTAGE TABULATION:MAIN RESIDENCE: Basement 999 Sq.Ft. (Less than 1,000 allowed) First Floor 4,309 Sq.Ft. Second Floor 2,363 Sq.Ft. 6,672 Sq.Ft.

Attached Garage 800 Sq.Ft.

Sub-Total 7,472 Sq.Ft.

T.D.S.F. 7,472 Sq.Ft. < 7,503.9 Sq.Ft.

BULK AREA TABULATION: (2/3's RULE)
Main Residence First Floor 4,309 SF Attached Garage 800 SF Total Ht. Below 18' 5,109 SFMaximum Area Allowed Over 18' (5,109 x .67) = 3,423.03 SFProposed Area Over 18' Second Floor Total 2,363 SF Area Over Entry 406 SF Total 2,769 SF < 3,423.03 SF
JULY
July 28, 2021
ATTACHMENT 2
84 GSPublisherVersion 0.13.100.42

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/derrickdavis/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968_v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 3/26/21D.W.B.,
T-1.2
SURVEY
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
30'-1/2" 6'-7 1/2"
1"X2" WOODAIR CONDITIONING UNITASPHALTBARBEQUEBLOCKBASIS OF BEARINGBRICKCLEARCONCRETE NAILCONCRETEDRAIN INLETDRAIN OUTLETDOWNENCROACHMENTETCHED OR SCRIBED "X"FOUNDFIRE HYDRANTFINISHED FLOORFLOW LINEFINISHED SURFACEGAS METER LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS:1X2AC UNITA/CBBQBLKB.O.B.BRKCLRCNCONCDIDODNENCRETCH "X"FDFHFFFLFSGM

GVH&TICVIPL&TMHMHTLO/HPILEPPPMXRRTSPSPKSSCOSSMHTCTWWWMWV GAS VALVEHUB & TACKIRRIGATION CONTROL VALVEIRON PIPELEAD & TACKMANHOLEMEAN HIGH TIDE LINEOVER HANGCONC PILE / CAISSONPOWER POLEPAINT MARK "X"RAIL ROAD TIESIGN POSTSPIKESANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTSANITARY SEWER MANHOLETOP CURBTOP WALLWASHERWATER METERWATER VALVE 20 Scale 1" = 20'
0 20 40 60
ICV
DN
SHED

WOODDECK
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. GARDEN FIRE PLANTER PIT
O/H
O/H
DN
DI
RRT
RRT
BLOCK
WALL
GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY
GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY
P.I.Q.

APN: 4466-015-015
1 STORY
STUCCO
HOUSE
O/H
N03°51'17"W
N90°00'00"E 373.69'
.
.
.
.
.
. P.I.Q. APN: 4466-015-016 (NOT A PART)
P.I.Q.

APN: 4466-015-014
(NOT A PART)
140.00'
SHED
30' 30'
6 0'
140.32'
N90°00'00"W 383.12'
WM
CL
GATE
X
X
X
GATE
STUCCO
WALL
DN
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. FH

POST(TYP)
X X
X
N00°00'00"W(B.O.B.)
W W W
210'
220'
220'
220'
230'
PROPERTY ADDRESS:6968 DUME DRIVEMALIBU, CA 90265ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:4466-015-015 (LOS ANGELES COUNTY)LEGAL DESCRIPTION:A PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TOPANGA MALIBUSEQUIT, AS CONFIRMED TO MATTHEW KELLER BY PATENT IN THE CITY OFMALIBU, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED INBOOK 1 PAGE 407 ET SEQ. OF PATENTS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTYRECORDER OF SAID COUNTY:BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF EASEMENT NO.1 (DUMEDRIVE) DESCRIBED IN THE DECLERATION OF EASEMENTS RECORDEDOCTOBER 21, 1956 IN BOOK 23566 PAGE 183, OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAIDPOINT OF BEGINNING BEING TRUE NORTH 166.28 FT FROM THE SOUTHERLY EXTREMITY OF THE CENTER LINE COURSE DESCRIBED IN SAIDEASEMENT NO. 1, AS TRUE SOUTH 811.28FT; THENCE FOLLOWING THECENTER LINE OF SAID EASEMENT NO. 1 TRUE NORTH 140.00FT, THENCEEAST 403.69FT THENCE S 3^51'17" E 140.32FT, THENCE WEST 413.12FT, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.EXCEPT THEREFROM ALL MINERALS, OIL, PETROLEUM, ASPHALTUM GAS,COAL AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES IN, ON, WITHIN AND UNDER SAID LANDS AND EVERY PART THEREOF BUT WITHOUT SURFACERIGHT OF ENTRY, AS RESERVED BY MARBLEHEAD LAND COMPANY, INDEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 27, 1946 IN BOOK 23923 PAGE 446, OFFICIALRECORDSTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED LAND IS SHOWN AS PARCEL 61 ON A RECORD OFSURVEY FILED IN BOOK 57 PAGES 47-50 INCLUSIVE, RECORD OF SURVEY,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.BASIS OF BEARINGS:THE BEARING OF N0^00'00"W ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF DUME DRIVEAS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY AS RECORDED IN BOOK 57 PAGES47 TO 50, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY,STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THISSURVEY.BENCH MARK:MALIBU 208.513' USGS MON 12 IN UP 59 FT N C/L PACIFIC Y-5438(2008) COAST HWY 124 FT E C/L HEATHERCLIFF RD & W SIDE DR TO HSE NO 29127 MKD (R 48 1928 RESET 1937) SURVEY MKR POST 3 FT UP 1 FT N.ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE BASED ON NGVD 1988 DATUM.

FD S & W

MAILBOX
30' STREET EASEMENT

PER TITLE
ITEM NO. 7
.
.
.
. GATE WOOD RAIL FENCE PP X
DN
PP 726872E
215.88
214.48
225.94
220.84
227.33
227.73
225.13
227.67
218.12
212.71
FS
227.52
227.40
214.31 223.51
223.19
214.70
225.09
225.55
216.74
223.29
228.52
228.09
220.52
225.32
229.72
220.63
FF
220.70
228.01
223.61
230.77
217.78
225.15
217.09
FS
225.85
FS
228.51
222.53
219.78
221.97
226.77
227.67
218.63
227.81
229.60
214.79
227.99
FS
227.95
212.92
223.42
227.82
220.31
212.61
224.19
224.90
214.80
221.48
FS
227.86
227.54
228.88
222.05
224.44
223.00
231.50
218.94
216.90
214.90
FS
225.30
226.74
227.20
222.65
227.11
218.58
216.53
227.99
FS
227.32
228.18
214.62
227.89
FS
227.84
211.10
224.72
215.57
220.66
FS
228.26
228.68
223.29
224.36
228.04
221.00
232.94 215.44
221.94
215.60
TW
229.98
215.67
225.83
FS
226.17
222.73
220.41
222.87
228.79
226.34
224.41
227.05
223.23
227.30
217.84
228.06
231.25
228.00
217.41
223.67
227.79
FS
227.84
209.66
221.80
219.07
219.19
220.79
227.85
222.66
226.12
218.36
TW
231.72
224.92
223.45
227.67
227.10
FS
228.97
219.68
227.62
228.88
225.09
226.93
225.04
225.84
227.54
228.01
227.86
223.64
227.67
FS
227.87 FF
229.72
226.98
209.57
220.48
223.69
226.67
221.82
FS
229.64
224.16
218.52
227.47
226.57
227.37
FS
228.60
224.80
227.46
224.98
227.68
220.31
FS
228.10
FS
229.34
227.81
218.85
223.72 227.68
FF
229.74
207.99
221.80
215.35
216.19
222.07
225.99
222.08
FS
228.57
222.12
TW
229.48
226.66
216.16
225.63
FS
228.19
224.34 225.77
225.33
227.91
227.54
FS
228.26
FS
228.64
220.33
227.45
216.15
224.13
227.84
209.34
222.35
213.36
217.53
233.08
228.36
219.58
226.12
220.80
FS
228.32
223.66
223.07
224.12
227.18
226.20
220.76
TW
230.67
223.75
224.42
227.28
FS
228.14
220.05
226.79
225.31
227.77
227.80
217.87
FS
227.94
227.00
220.35
FS
229.41
213.86
224.60
227.41
226.21
223.51
211.90
227.99
217.40
226.56
219.19
FS
228.41
222.33
226.57
226.61
220.39
224.02
226.80
221.61
219.97
217.59
227.62
227.79
227.88
FS
227.69
225.89
221.20
223.56
227.72
FS
229.38
229.30
212.08
224.72
227.06
228.02
226.85
FF
228.54
227.53
218.38
225.14
222.35
FS
227.58
221.98
227.86
226.88
216.94
224.09
227.33
221.77
232.44
222.03
227.66 215.90
228.02
FS
227.51
218.81
210.78
223.89
226.53
224.78
219.72
FF
221.96
228.68
TW
226.69
228.95
215.92
222.83
225.93
FS
226.12
220.20
TW
228.80
BARN
NOTES:1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. EASEMENTS, IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP. 2) PERTAINING TO SURVEY AND TOPO MAP, IF RETAINING WALLS OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES ARE TO BE DESIGNED FROM CONTOURS SHOWNON THIS MAP, GROUND ELEVATIONS AT CRITICAL POINTS CONTROLLINGTHE DESIGN SHOULD BE VERIFIED BY DIRECT LOCATION AND LEVELSPRIOR TO FINAL DESIGN ADOPTION.3) UTILITIES, IF LOCATED, ARE BY SURFACE EVIDENCE ONLY. (MANHOLES, WATER METERS, GAS METERS, POWER POLES, ETC.)4) GROSS PARCEL AREA = 52,977 SQ. FT. / 1.22 ACRES FOOTPRINT OF 2 STORY STUCCO HOUSE: 2,542 SQ. FT.FOOTPRINT OF 1 STORY WOOD BARN: 242 SQ. FT. 6" TREE 9" TREE
12" TREE
(TYP)
WRF
WRF
POST
(TYP)

FD S & W
140.00'
986.28'
N00°00'00"W

BLUEWATER RD
X
W
II
WIF
CL
LEGEND:PROPERTY LINE:

STREET CENTERLINE:

EASEMENT:MONUMENT:

STREET LIGHT (ST.LT.):

ASPHALT (A/C):

BUILDING:

CHAIN LINK FENCE (C.L.F.):

WOOD FENCE:WIRE FENCE:WROUGHT IRON-FENCE
4" 4" 4" 4" 4"
4" 4" 4" 4"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. CONCRETE (CONC.): . TILE:

SLATE/FLAGSTONE:

DIRT/GRAVEL:BRICK (BRK):MANHOLE (M.H.):

TREES: PINE PALM EUC OAK TREE
CL
CL
225'
225'
225'
SLOPE ANALYSIS LEGEND:

FLATTER THAN 4:1 = 49,729 SQ. FT.
4:1 TO 3:1 = 2,007 SQ. FT.
72
  64)7
72
  064)7
1:1 AND STEEPER = 0.00 SQ.FT.

STREET EASEMENT = 0.00 SQ. FT.GROSS AREA = 52,977 SQ. FT./ 1.22 ACRES

NET AREA (GROSS MINUS STREET EASEMENTS
AND SLOPES 1:1 AND STEEPER) = 52,977 SQ. FT./ 1.22 ACRES ICV
DN
SHED

WOODDECK
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. GARDEN FIRE PLANTER PIT
O/H
O/H
DN
DI
RRT
RRT
BLOCK
WALL
GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY
GRAVEL

DRIVEWAY

ASPHALT

DRIVEWAY
P.I.Q.

APN: 4466-015-015
1 STORY
STUCCO
HOUSE
O/H
N03°51'17"W
N90°00'00"E 373.69'
.
.
.
.
.
. P.I.Q. APN: 4466-015-016 (NOT A PART)
P.I.Q.

APN: 4466-015-014
(NOT A PART)
140.00'

DUME DRIVE
SHED
30' 30'
6 0'
140.32'
N90°00'00"W 383.12'
WM
CL
GATE
X
WRF
X
X
X
GATE
STUCCO
WALL
DN
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. FH

POST(TYP)
X X
X
N00°00'00"W(B.O.B.)
W W W
210'
220'
220'
220'
230'

FD S & W

MAILBOX
30' STREET EASEMENT

PER TITLE
ITEM NO. 7
.
.
.
. GATE WOOD RAIL FENCE
W
W X
PP
DN
PP 726872E
215.88
214.48
225.94
220.84
227.33
225.13
227.67
218.12
212.71
FS
227.52
227.40
214.31 223.51
223.19
214.70
224
225.55
216.74
223.29
228.52
228.09
220.52
225.32
229.72
220.63
FF
220.70
228.01
223.61
230.77
217.78
225.15
217.09
FS
225.85
FS
228.51
222.53
219.78
221.97
226.77
227.67
218.63
227.81
229.60
214.79
227.99
FS
227.95
212.92
223.42
227.82
220.31
212.61
224.19
224.90
214.80
221.48
FS
227.86
227.54
228.88
222.05
224.44
223.00
231.50
218.94
216.90
214.90
FS
225.30
226.74
227.20
222.65
227.11
218.58
216.53
227.99
FS
227.32
228.18
214.62
227.89
FS
227.84
211.10
224.72
215.57
220.66
FS
228.26
228.68
223.29
224.36
228.04
221.00
232.94 215.44
221.94
215.60
TW
229.98
215.67
225.83
FS
226.17
222.73
220.41
222.87
228.79
226.34
224.41
227.05
223.23
227.30
217.84
228.06
231.25
228.00
217.41
223.67
227.79
FS
227.84
209.66
221.80
219.07
219.19
220.79
227.85
222.66
226.12
218.36
TW
231.72
224.92
223.45
227.67
227.10
FS
228.97
219.68
227.62
228.88
225.09
226.93
225.04
225.84
227.54
228.01
227.86
223.64
227.67
FS
227.87 FF
229.72
226.98
209.57
220.48
223.69
226.67
221.82
FS
229.64
224.16
218.52
227.47
226.57
227.37
FS
228.60
224.80
227.46
224.98
227.68
220.31
FS
228.10
FS
229.34
218.85
223.72 227.68
FF
229.74
207.99
221.80
215.35
216.19
222.07
225.99
222.08
FS
228.57
222.12
TW
229.48
226.66
216.16
225.63
FS
228.19
224.34 225.77
225.33
227.91
227.54
FS
228.26
FS
228.64
220.33
227.45
216.15
224.13
227.84
209.34
222.35
213.36
217.53
233.08
228.36
219.58
226.12
220.80
FS
228.32
223.66
223.07
224.12
227.18
226.20
220.76
TW
230.67
223.75
224.42
227.28
FS
228.14
220.05
226.79
225.31
227.77
227.80
217.87
FS
227.94
227.00
220.35
FS
229.41
213.86
224.60
227.41
226.21
223.51
211.90
227.99
217.40
226.56
219.19
FS
228.41
222.33
226.57
226.61
220.39
224.02
226.80
221.61
219.97
217.59
227.62
227.79
227.88
FS
227.69
225.89
221.20
223.56
227.72
FS
229.38
229.30
212.08
224.72
227.06
228.02
226.85
FF
228.54
227.53
218.38
225.14
222.35
FS
227.58
221.98
226.88
216.94
224.09
227.33
221.77
232.44
222.03
227.66 215.90
228.02
FS
227.51
218.81
210.78
223.89
226.53
224.78
219.72
FF
221.96
228.68
TW
226.69
228.95
215.92
222.83
225.93
FS
226.12
220.20
TW
228.80
BARN
6" TREE 9" TREE
12" TREE
(TYP)
WRF
WRF
POST
(TYP)

FD S & W
140.00'
986.28'
N00°00'00"W

BLUEWATER RD

SYC PEPPER CORK OLIVE
CL
CL
225'
224
224
1/16" = 1'-0"
85 86
GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-0.1

PROPOSED SITE ANDGATE PLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
112 114 113
104
102
1A
101
111
112114113
1D 108 109
103
1E 1B
107
1G
1C
1F
110
105
106
14'-0"
56'-7"
112'-0"
20'-0"
21'
-0"
65'-0"
5'-0"
30'-1/2" 6'-7 1/2"
4'-0"
20'-0"
225.50
228.25'
227.75'
228.00' 228.25'
232.50'
232.00'
228.00'
228.00'
226.00'
224.00'
228.00'
228.00'
228.00'
225.25'
228.00'
232.50'
225.20'FS
225.00'FS
225.00'
224.75'
226.00'
226.50' 227.00' 227.50'
226.50'
226.02'

GATE MOTOR

WITHIN TRASH

ENCLOSURE
226'

GATE MOTOR
6"

NATURAL
STONE
CURB
6'

NATURAL
STONE
CURB
224'
225'

SURFBOARDS
OH
12X12

COL TYP
OH
232.50' TOW230.00' BOW
232.50' TOW228.00' BOW
+42"
228.00' TOW
222.00' BOW
228.00' TOW +42"
222.00' BOW
6' HIGH

WOOD FENCE

CANTILEVERED

WD WALKWAY

RW CONTINUES

UNDER WALKWAY

ELEC CARCHARGING STATION

FD - RATED

GRAVEL OR

INTERLOCKING
PAVERS

GATE TRACK
@ GROUND
6' WOODFENCE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
232.00' TOW
228.00' BOW
232.50' TOW228.00' BOW
2'x2'x6' BFC

PILASTER
IC
MAX 42" SOLID
HEDGE

STEPPING
STONE
(E) MAILBOX

TO REMAIN
6' HIGH OPEN
FENCE

CITY ROW (DG

PER CITY SPECS)
225'
+48" DBL

SIDED GAS

ISOKERN FP
+18"
230.00' TOW228.00' BOW
(N) 6' HIGH CHAIN
LINK FENCE @ PL
(N) 6' HIGH CHAIN
LINK FENCE @ PL
PROPOSED 1,200GPD SEPTIC TANK

ABANDONEDPIT

ABANDONED
PIT

ABANDONED

SEPTIC TANK

FD KNOX
BOX

NO FOOTINGS

AT CONC PAD

H/C OUTDOOR

SHOWER /HOSE
BIB

STONECURBE

STONECURBE
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
20' WIDE

FD SPUR
D-BOX
GARDEN

PLANTER
N03°51'17"
W
140.00'
140.32
'
N90°00'00"W 383.12'
WM
CL
X
X

W W X W
210'
220'
220'
30' STREET EASEMENT

PER TITLE
ITEM NO. 7
PP 726872E
215.88
214.48
212.71
214.31
214.70
225.09
217.09
FS
225.85
214.79
212.92
212.61
216.90
214.90
FS
225.30
216.53
214.62
211.10
215.44
215.60
215.67
217.84
217.41
209.66
218.36
223.45
227.86
209.57
218.52
224.80
218.85
207.99
226.66
216.16
224.34
FS
228.64
227.45
216.15
209.34
213.36
226.12
224.12
220.05
227.00
213.86
211.90
226.57
219.97
217.59
225.89
212.08
216.94
232.44
222.03
215.90
210.78
140.00'
N00°00'00"W
225'
225'
GARDEN

PLANTER
N03°51'17"
W
140.00'

DUME DRIVE
140.32
'
N90°00'00"W 383.12'
WM
CL
X
X

W W X W
210'
220'
220'
30' STREET EASEMENT

PER TITLE
ITEM NO. 7
W X
PP 726872E
215.88
214.48
212.71
214.31
214.70
217.09
FS
225.85
214.79
212.92
212.61
216.90
214.90
FS
225.30
216.53
214.62
211.10
215.44
215.60
215.67
217.84
217.41
209.66
218.36
223.45
227.86
209.57
218.52
224.80
218.85
207.99
226.66
216.16
224.34
FS
228.64
227.45
216.15
209.34
213.36
226.12
224.12
220.05
227.00
213.86
211.90
226.57
219.97
217.59
225.89
212.08
216.94
222.03
215.90
210.78
140.00'
N00°00'00"W

TWO STORY SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENCE

W/ BASEMENT
& DETACHED GARAGE
20'x60'
SPA
6'x9'
228.00'
WL
POOL
3-CAR
GARAGE

OUTDOOR
SHOWER
PA.

PA.

TENNIS
COURT
(120 x 60)
219.00'
10% SYSB
20% OR 65' MAX.
15%
RYSB
3060
GATE
PA.

IPE WOOD
PA.
3060
GATE
224
224
PA PA
DN
PA.
15% SYSB
PIZZA
OVEN
DN
+36"
BBQ
WOOD
3060
GATE
WOOD
BF
DOORS
PA.

DINING

PAVILION
16'x36'

PAVILION
20 X 20
GRAVEL
PA
PA
DN
42'x66'
FAKE
GRASS
LAP
LANE
CONC

STEPS DN
GRAVEL
20'x30'

FIREPIT
3'x16'
CONC

STEPS DN
CONC

STEPS DN
PA.

CONC
DECK
WOOD
DECK
9x12
TALL FICUS HEDGE @ PL
CONC
3080
GLASS
LIGHT
WELL
TRASH
6 X 15
6060
WOOD
GATE
AD
HEDGE
@ PL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
PA
HEDGE
@ PL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
FYSB
DN
TV
PA

PERMEABLE

SLATE TILE

PERMEABLE

SLATE TILE
FUTURE
PIT
FUTURE

PIT PRPSD
PIT
PA
225 225
228
227
226
FS225.00
FS225.00
224.00
226
222.00
226
228
226

CUT NAT DL
FILL
NAT DL

NCUTAT DL
PRPSD
PIT
1 1
0%
5%
10%
20% OR 65' MAX.

PA
TALL FICUS HEDGE @ PL
PA
CONC
15060

ROLLING
GATE
PIZZA
BAR
30"X48" SINK
BBQ
T
20'-0" 15'-0"
(2)10' SWING
GATE

LOW DOWNCASTLIGHT
6' HIGH SMOOTHPLASTER PILASTER
6' HIGH OPENFENCE
MAX 42"SOLID HEDGE
6' HIGH SMOOTH

PLASTER PILASTER

LOW DOWNCAST
LIGHT
PL
PL

ROLLING
GATE
20'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6"
6"
1'-6" 6' MAX.
0 1/2"
TS 2"X2" X 1/4"
REBAR VERT. EACH CELL
8" CMU BLOCKREBAR TIES @ 16" O.C.BICK VENEERFILL SOLID W/ GROUT 5"X 5" X 1/4" THICK PLATE
6'-0"X 6'-0" X 1'-6" THICK PAD FOOTINGRE: STRUCTURAL PLAN TS 2"X2" X 1/4"REBAR VERT. EACH CELL8" CMU BLOCKREBAR TIES @ 16" O.C.BICK VENEERFILL SOLID W/ GROUT6'-0"X 6'-0" X 1'-6" THICK PAD FORE: STRUCTURAL PLAN 5"X 5" X 1/4" THICK PLATE
CLR. AT GATE OPENING
A

PILASTER PLAN SECTION A
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"

SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

GATE PLAN
SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"

GATE DETAILS

AS NOTED
87 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-0.2

PROPOSED PARTIALSITE PLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
T
112 114 113
104
102
1A
101
111
112114113
1D 108 109
103
1E 1B
107
1G
1C
1F
110
105
106
14'-0"
112'-0"
20'-0"
21'-0"
65'-0"
5'-0"
30'-1/2" 6'-7 1/2"
4'-0"
20'-0"
225.50
228.25'
227.75'
228.00' 228.25'
232.50'
232.00'
228.00'
224.00'
228.00'
228.00'
228.00'
225.25'
228.00'
225.20'FS
225.00'FS
225.00'
224.75'
226.00'
226.50' 227.00' 227.50'
226.50'
226.02'

GATE MOTOR

WITHIN TRASH

ENCLOSURE
226'

GATE MOTOR
6"

NATURAL
STONE
CURB
6'

NATURAL
STONE
CURB
224'
225'

SURFBOARDS
OH
232.50' TOW228.00' BOW
+42"
228.00' TOW
222.00' BOW
228.00' TOW +42"
222.00' BOW
6' HIGH

WOOD FENCE

CANTILEVERED

WD WALKWAY

RW CONTINUES

UNDER WALKWAY

ELEC CARCHARGING STATION

FD - RATED

GRAVEL OR

INTERLOCKING
PAVERS

GATE TRACK
@ GROUND
6' WOODFENCE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
232.00' TOW
228.00' BOW
232.50' TOW228.00' BOW
2'x2'x6' BFC

PILASTER
IC
MAX 42" SOLID
HEDGE

STEPPING
STONE
(E) MAILBOX

TO REMAIN
6' HIGH OPEN
FENCE

CITY ROW (DG

PER CITY SPECS)
225'
(N) 6' HIGH CHAIN
LINK FENCE @ PL
PROPOSED 1,200GPD SEPTIC TANK

ABANDONEDPIT

ABANDONED
PIT

ABANDONED

SEPTIC TANK

FD KNOX
BOX

NO FOOTINGS

AT CONC PAD

H/C OUTDOOR

SHOWER /HOSE
BIB

STONECURBE

STONECURBE
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
T.W. 225.00'
B.W. 220.00'
20' WIDE

FD SPUR
D-BOX
N90°00'00"E
140.00'
N90°00'00"W
WM
CL
W W
T

GATE PP
PP 726872E
225.09
FS
225.85
FS
225.30
226.12
140.00'
N00°00'00"W
N90°00'00"E
140.00'

DUME DRIVE
N90°00'00"W
WM
CL
W W
T
GATE
W X
PP
PP 726872E
FS
225.85
FS
225.30
226.12
140.00'
N00°00'00"W

TWO STORY SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENCE

W/ BASEMENT
& DETACHED GARAGE
20'x60'
SPA
6'x9'
228.00'
WL
POOL
3-CAR
GARAGE

OUTDOOR
SHOWER
PA.

PA.
10% SYSB
20% OR 65' MAX.
3060
GATE
PA.

IPE WOOD
PA.
3060
GATE
224
224
PA PA
DN
PA.
15% SYSB
PIZZA
OVEN
DN
+36"
BBQ
WOOD
3060
GATE
WOOD
BF
DOORS
PA.

PAVILION
20 X 20
GRAVEL
PA
PA
DN
LAP
LANE
PA.

CONC
DECK
WOOD
DECK
9x12
TALL FICUS HEDGE @ PL
CONC
3080
GLASS
LIGHT
WELL
TRASH
6 X 15
6060
WOOD
GATE
AD
HEDGE
@ PL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
PA
HEDGE
@ PL
GRAVEL
GRAVEL
FYSB
DN
(N) HEDGE @ PL
FUTURE
PIT
FUTURE

PIT PRPSD
PIT
PA
225 225
228
227
226
FS225.00
FS225.00
224.00
226
222.00
PRPSD
PIT
10%
15%
10%
20% OR 65' MAX.

PA
TALL FICUS HEDGE @ PL
PA
CONC
15060

ROLLING
GATE
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"

PARTIAL SITE PLAN

AS NOTED
88 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-1.1

PROPOSED BASEMENTPLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
0A
002
003
004
001
4'-0" 4"
4" 4'-0"
EQ EQ
4'-0"
215.625'
217.000'
214.250' 214.250'
12' SCREEN

SEPTIC LIFTPUMP

PROJECTOR
GARAGE

SLAB ON GRADE
ABOVE
6' CH

FIREPLACE

FOOTING
POOL
ABOVE
6' CRAWL SPACE
ACCESS

MECH/ STOR
6' CH
MECH.#2
SNACK
6' CRAWL SPACE
ACCESS
3090
3060

HIGH DR
3060

HIGH DR
2880
SLAB
ABOVE
SLAB
ABOVE
SLAB
ABOVE
SLAB
ABOVE
SLAB
ABOVE
OPEN
TO
ABOVE
U/C
REF
2' CRAWL
SPACE
ACCESS
FAU.FAU.
2' CRAWL
SPACE
ACCESS
WH
WH
SINK
UPUP
AD.

AD.

UP

FLOATING
STAIR
AD.
5026
FX.
2' CRAWL
SPACE
ACCESS
2' CRAWL
SPACE
ACCESS
6' CH

AV AREA

LIGHT WELL
24 R @ 7"
23 T @ 11"
001- 12'CH
A
A31
A
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
M-S
A22
M-N
A-2.2
M-E
A-2.1
DP-W
A-1.5
P-E
A-1.5
P-W
A-1.5
P-N
A-1.5
P-S
A-1.5
22'x32'

THEATER
005
8'x34.5'
004

8.75'x11'
002
5'x5.5'
PWDR
003

7.5'x24.5'
PLAN
NORTH
TN 1/4" = 1'-0"
89 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-1.2

PROPOSED FIRSTFLOOR PLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
PLAN
NORTH
TN
112 114 113
104
102
1A
115
101
111
112114113
1D 108 109
116
103
123
1B
117
120
1E
118
121
119
107
1G
1C
1F
110
105
122
106
RANGE
2'-9" 4'-0" 4"
22'-6"
22'-7" 5'-8 1/2"
21'-0" 14'-0" 4" 4'-0"
4'-0"
3'-0" 5'-5 1/2" 5'-5 1/2" 3'-0" 6'-1/2" 6'-1/2"
21'-0"
30'-1/2" 6'-7 1/2"
4'-0"
228.250'
228.250'
228.250'
228.000'
228.000'
225.00'
225.250'
A
A31
A
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
M-S
A22
M-N
A-2.2
M-E
A-2.1
M-W
A-2.1
OH
OH

RECESSEDTV
1 HR. FIRE RATED

CONSTRUCTION
TYP. "X" @ WALLS,

CEILING, POSTS AND BEAM

COUNTER
UPPERS
MC
56100 FX.WINDOW
OH
OH
+9" CURB
HANGER

TRAY CEILING
MC
HOOD

BI BOOKS BI BOOKS
30x36 ATTIC

ACCESS W/ PULL

DOWN LADDER

LIBRARYLADDER
6' HIGHWOODFENCE
OH
10%
(4)60100

PCKT SLIDERS
(4)59100

PCKT SLIDERS
UP 20 R @ 7 1/2" 19 T @ 11"
DN

21.75' x 34'
118
GARAGE
(3)28100

BI-FOLD
FLOOR
HEARTH
FLOOR
HEARTH
8'

FIREPLACE
1626
OPEN
TO
BELOW
+36"
2890
9' CH
(4)59100

PCKT SLIDERS
3090
PKT
3090
3090 PKT
GLASS
5060
DBL
CSMT
30100
CO.
123
36"
F
36"
R
36" OV/
MICRO/
WD
2890
2890
+36"
+42" ISLAND
5'x12'
DW
2890
(3)3090

BI-FOLD
2660
CSMT
@ 3' SILL
225100

PCKT SLDRS
(2)56100

SLIDERS
15%
SYSB
50180
FX.

11.5'x30'
102
FOYER
6'x7.5'
BATH #6
114
115
12'x15'
BDRM. #6
111
15'x16.5'
BDRM. #5 3'x5.5'
PA.
14'x17'
116
MUD/

LAUNDRY
113
WIP
5'x8'
16'x36'
110

KITCHEN
GREAT
ROOM
108 - 10.5' CH
29'x48'
OPEN

TRELLIS
101
12'x12'
103- 9'CH

5.25'x11.5'
PWDR#1
117

5.5'x7'
PWDR#2
104 - 10.5' CH
DEN

26.5 'x 27'
50100
FX.
3060
SL
STACK
W/D
STACK
W/D
DRIP/
DRY
AREA
2890
-2"
-2"
-2"
-2"
-2"
-2"
-2"
-2"

COVERED
PORCH#2
120

5.92'x12.5'
OPEN

TRELLIS
ABOVE
6" WOOD
(IPE)
80100 DBL
FRENCH
DOORS
BOOKS
2060
ISLAND

FLOATING
STAIR

FLOATING
STAIR
OPEN

TRELLIS
ABOVE
OPEN

TRELLIS
ABOVE
(5)211100

BI-FOLD
2890
CO.
5690

SLIDERS
+18"
SEAT
4' VESSEL

SINK W/
2 WALL

FAUCETS
+30"
BI.

COFFEE DW

LIGHT WELL
DN
SEAT
-4"
BR
PA PA
-2"
121
6'x12'
BATH #5
AD.

BOOKS
SURF
BOARDS
5'.75 x 22.75'

COVERED
PORCH
6" WOOD IPE
9'x 26'
BAR
105 - 10.5' CH
1 3080
24 R @ 7"
23 T @ 11"

REF WINE
1/4" = 1'-0"
90 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-1.3

PROPOSED SECONDFLOOR PLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
2F
2G
2H
2J
2I
207
212
2D
2E
210
216
214 215
204
2K 2L
201
202
209
208
213
217
2C
2A
205
211
2B
206
203

DRESSER
A
A31
A
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
M-S
A22
M-N
A-2.2
M-E
A-2.1
M-W
A-2.1
4'-0" 1'-3"
240.583'
240.583'
+42" CABLE

RAILING
+42" GLASS

RAILING
+42" SOLIDWALL
6" FLUE
HIDDEN

BOOKCASE
6' SOLIDWALL
4x4 ALUM
+30" GLASS OF
+18" SOLID
FX.

OH
OH
+42" GLASS

RAILING

STONE VENEER
+42" SOLID
20 R @ 7 1/2"
19 T @ 11" DN
(4)6080

PCKT SLIDERS
OPEN
TO
BELOW
48"

OUTDOOR
FP
OPEN

TRELLIS
FLOOR
HEARTH
42"

FIREPLACE

OUTDOOR
SHOWER
2880
PKT
2880
6" WOOD
(IPE)
6" WOOD
IPE
12080

PCKT SLIDER
2880
CO
2880
C.O.

BOOKS
6080 DBL
FRENCH
DOORS
2640 CSMT
@ 4.0' SILL
-4"

LIBRARY
LADDER

BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS
BOOKS
2640
CSMT
2640
CSMT
-4"
BENCH
2640
CSMT
PA.

OPEN

TRELLIS
5'x12.75'
DECK#1
212
210

12.75'18.5'
MASTER
BATH
209
22'x24'
MASTER
BDRM.
211
10'x25'
MASTER
WIC
208

3.5'x10'
HALL #1
OPEN
TO
BELOW

2.5x2.5
ATTIC
ACCESS
3080 DBL
FRENCH
DOORS
VANITY
+30"
+30"
3x6
TUB
3060
2'x10.5'
ISLAND
2'x6'
ISLAND
6" WOOD
(IPE)
6" WOOD
(IPE)
6" WOOD
(IPE)
6" WOOD
(IPE)
207
12'x20'
BDRM. #2
206

13.5'x18'
STUDY/
BDRM. #3 5.25'x12'
BATH #3
205

5.5'x37'

GALLERY
201

BOOKS BOOKS
6'x12'

READING
AREA
202
BOOKS
BIG

CRICKET
BIG

CRICKET
16'x17'

4.5'x9'
DECK#2
213
5'x55'
DECK#3
214
19'x19.5'
DECK#4
215
216
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
BOOKS
2880
PKT
2880
PKT
2880
PKT
BI.
8080

BI-FOLD
3080
4:12
SLOPE
KING

DBL CSMT
5040
2640 CSMT
@ 4.0' SILL
2640 CSMT
@ 4.0' SILL
2640 CSMT
@ 4.0' SILL
NORTH
HALL

3.5'x12'
212
2880
PKT
-4"
8'x8'
203
BATH #2
2880
PKT
2640
CSMT
2640
CSMT
10080
SLD
SLSL

CANTILVR
BENCH

CANTILVR
BENCH
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
(2)6080

SLIDERS
240.750'
240.750'
1/4" = 1'-0"
91 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-1.4

PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
3A
A
A31
A
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
B
A-3.1
M-S
A22
M-N
A-2.2
M-E
A-2.1
M-W
A-2.1

STONE VENEER
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
3 1/2:12
SLOPE
OPEN

TRELLIS
BELOW
PA.

BELOW
3060

SKYLIGHT
BIG

CRICKET
BIG

CRICKET
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
OPEN

TRELLIS
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
4:12
SLOPE
PLAN
NORTH
TN
1/4" = 1'-0"
92 GSPublisherVersion 0.13.100.42

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/derrickdavis/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968_v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 3/26/21D.W.B.,
A-1.5

PROPOSED PAVILIONS
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
9'-0" 4'-1/2"
13'-1/2"
228.250'237.253'241.311'
4":12"
FF @ DINING PAVILIONCH @ DINING PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
9'-0" 4'-1/2"
13'-1/2"
228.250'237.253'241.311'
4":12"
FF @ DINING PAVILION
CH @ DINING PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
9'-0" 4'-1/2"
13'-1/2"
228.250'237.253'241.311'
FF @ DINING PAVILIONCH @ DINING PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
FPTV
9'-0" 4'-1/2"
13'-1/2"
228.250'237.253'241.311'
4:12
FF @ DINING PAVILION
CH @ DINING PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
FP
DINING

PAVILION
16'x36'
OPEN

TRELLIS
+48" DBL

SIDED GAS

ISOKERN FP
OPEN

TRELLIS
224.000'

STONE VENEER

EARTHSTONE
MODEL 110

MODULAR OVEN
6" WOOD
(IPE)

PAVILION
18'x18'
128
+36"
BBQ
SINK
OPEN

TRELLIS
OPEN

TRELLIS
9'-0" 4'-9"
13'-9 1/2"
228.00'237.00'241.77'
FF @ PAVILIONCH @ PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
9'-0" 4'-9"
13'-9 1/2"
228.00'237.00'241.77'
FF @ PAVILION
CH @ PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
9'-0" 4'-9"
13'-9 1/2"
228.00'237.00'241.77'
FF @ PAVILIONCH @ PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
9'-0" 4'-9"
13'-9 1/2"
228.00'237.00'241.77'
FF @ PAVILIONCH @ PAVILION

TOP OF ROOF
PLAN
NORTH
TN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED ROOF
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION

AS NOTED

DINING PAVILION

POOL PAVILION
93 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-2.1

PROPOSED MAIN HOUSEELEVATIONS
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
10'-6" 2'-0" 9'-0" 5'-10 1/2" 249.75' 240.75' 238.75'
228.25'
27'-8" MAX
255.61'
3 1/4" :12"
PITCH @ HIGH ROOF
4" :12"
PITCH @

LOWER ROOF
FX.

F.F. @ FIRST FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ FIRST FLOOR
F.F. @ SECOND FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF ROOF
17'-6 1/2" 12'-1/2"
226.00'226.25'228.25'238.75'240.75'243.54'245.62'249.75'255.61' 27'-4 1/2"
3" 2'-0" 10'-6" 2'-0" 2'-9 1/2" 6'-2 1/2" 5'-10 1/2" 225.00'LIGHT WELL 27'-8" MAX
FLASHING(TYP.)
3 1/4" :12"
PITCH @ HIGH ROOF
4" :12"
PITCH @

LOWER ROOF
FX.

F.F. @ FIRST FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ FIRST FLOOR
F.F. @ SECOND FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF ROOF
F.F. @ GARAGE
FG @ GARAGE COURT
TOP OF ROOF @ GARAGE
TOP OF ROOF @ FF
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

WEST ELEVATION

AS NOTED
94 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-2.2

PROPOSED MAIN HOUSEELEVATIONS
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
3 1/4" :12"
PITCH @ HIGH ROOF
4" :12"
PITCH @

LOWER ROOF
F.F. @ FIRST FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ FIRST FLOOR
F.F. @ SECOND FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF ROOF
F.F. @ GARAGEFG @ GARAGE COURTTOP OF ROOF @ GARAGE
10'-6" 2'-0" 9'-0" 5'-10 1/2" 249.75' 240.75' 238.75'
228.25'
27'-4 1/2"
255.61'
17'-6 1/2"
226.00'226.25'243.54'
3" 17'-3 1/2"
1'-9" 10'-6" 2'-0" 9'-0" 5'-10 1/2" 249.75' 240.75' 238.75' 226.50' 228.25' 27'-4 1/2"
255.61'
3 1/4" :12"
PITCH @ HIGH ROOF
4" :12"
PITCH @

LOWER ROOF
F.F. @ FIRST FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ FIRST FLOOR
F.F. @ SECOND FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF ROOF
F.F. @ GARAGE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION

AS NOTED
95 GSPublisherVersion 124.10.80.43

MARK DATE DESCRIPTION

SHEET TITLE

PROJECTDATESCALE
DRAWING NO.

DRAWN BY

THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE

THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE

ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON

ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY WRITTEN
AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT.

WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE VERIFIED
ON THE JOB SITE. DISCREPANCIES SHALL

BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE

ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HWY.MALIBU, CA 90265TEL. 310-456-5905 480 WASHINGTON AVE.

KETCHUM, ID 83340
TEL: 208-495-3228
SUITE 204 C
6968

DUME DR

RESIDENCE
/Users/S/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~CloudDocs/PF/Project List/Burnett Cameron - 6968 Dume/2d3d/Burnett_6968 _v21_20210324.pln Plot Date: 7/27/21D.W.B.,
A-3.1

PROPOSED SECTIONS
#Project Name
6968 DUME DR.

Malibu, CA
12'-0" 2'-0" 10'-6" 2'-0" 9'-0" 6'-2 1/2"
255.947'249.750'240.750'228.250'226.250'214.250'
14'-0" 27'-8 1/2"
6'-0"
6'-0"
238.750'
6'-0"
214.250'
215.625'
217.000'
220.250'
12'-0"

THEATER
MECH 1
TO
STAIRS
TO

AV/ELEC

BATH KITCHEN GREAT RM
TO
OPEN

TRELLIS
MSTR BATH MSTR BDRM STUDY/BDRM #3
TO

MSTR W/C
TO

GALLERY
F.F. @ BASEMENT
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ BASEMENT
F.F. @ FIRST FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ FIRST FLOOR
F.F. @ SECOND FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ SECOND FLOOR

TOP OF ROOF
CRAWL SPACE MECH 2 CRAWL SPACE
BDRM #2

DEN BAR
12'-0" 9'-0" 8'-3 1/2" 10'-1/2" 235.250' 226.250' 243.544' 214.250'
39'-4"
253.586'
6'-0"

THEATER PWDR
TO
MECH #1
GARAGE
KITCHEN PWDR #2
TO
BDRM #6
MASTER
WIC
MASTER
BATH
PA.

DECK #4
F.F. @ BASEMENT
F.F. @ GARAGE
CEILING HEIGHT.
@ GARAGE

TOP OF ROOF

CRAWL SPACE
TOP OF ROOF @ GARAGE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

SECTION A
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

SECTION B

AS NOTED
96 97
98 99
PREPARED BY: REVISIONS
.
# DATE
OWNER INFORMATION:

VALLEY EXECUTIVE TELECOM TRUST
c/o ROBYN MORUZZI-BURDGE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAYMALIBU, CA., 90265
(310) 456-5905(310) 456-2467 fax
SHT. 1 COVER SHEET
SHT. 2

SUBJECT SITE

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES

1. All work shown on these plans shall be constructed in accordance with the current edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC) "Green Book." .

2. Contractors shall comply with all applicable Division of Industrial Regulations (Cal-OSHA) safety standards. If requested by the Inspector, the Contractor shall provide proof of a permit from said division.

3. Contractor shall call the Public Works Inspector at (310) 456-2489, ext. 235 for Pre-Construction Meeting prior to the commencement of any construction or grading operations. Contractor shall notify the City Public Works Inspector 48 hours prior tocommencing any construction and 24 hours in advance of specific inspection needs during the course of the work.

4. No improvements are proposed within the Public Right-Of-Way.

5. Storage of any construction materials, construction trailer, and/or parking and any work within the City public right of way shall require a City Encroachment Permit.

Call the Public Works Inspector at (310) 456-2489, ext. 235 to apply for a permit.

6. Storage of any construction materials, construction trailer, and/or parking and any work within the Caltrans public right of way shall require a Caltrans Encroachment Permit. Submit a copy of the Caltrans Encroachment Permit to the Public WorksDepartment.

7. All work shall be performed during City working hours and in compliance with these plans.

8. Contractor shall verify all conditions and dimensions and shall report any discrepancies to the Engineer prior to the commencement of any work.

9. Contractor shall locate, protect, and save any and all survey monuments that will be or may be damaged or destroyed by their operations. Once found, the Contractor shall then notify both the developer's supervising Civil Engineer and the Public Works Inspector. The supervising Civil Engineer shall reset all said monuments per he requirements of the Professional Land Surveyor's Act.

10. The Contractor shall be responsible for protecting all public and private property insofar as it may be affected by these operations.

11. Existing traffic signs are not to be removed without prior notification and approval of the City Engineer. As a minimum, construction work zone traffic signs and striping shall be furnished, installed, and maintained in accordance with the "Work Area Traffic Control Handbook" (the "WATCH Manual"), published by BNI Building News, Inc. A Traffic Control Plan, prepared by the developer, may be required by the City.

12. Dust control shall be maintained at all times.13. Erosion Control Plans shall be provided for all projects. Grading and clearing is prohibited from November 1 to March 31 for all developments within or adjacent toESHA and/or including grading on slopes greater than 4:1.

14. All underground utilities and service laterals shall be installed prior to construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and paving unless otherwise permitted by the City Engineer.

15. The Developer shall comply with NPDES requirements. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the construction site at all times andshall be kept updated.

16. All recommendations made by the Geotechnical/Soils Engineer (and Engineering Geologist, where employed), and contained in the reports referenced hereon, as approved or conditioned by the City, shall be considered a part of the Grading Plan.

17. All storm drain pipe within the public right-of-way and easements shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP).

18. Terrace drains, interceptor drains, and down drains shall be constructed of 3" P.C.C. reinforced with 6"x6" x #10 W.W.M. and shall be either semicircular or triangular cross section. Concrete color shall be "Omaha Tan" or approved equivalent.

19. Grading Quantities: (See Table Below)
Cut:____1428_ cu.yd. Fill:___635______ cu.yd.

Export:___792__ cu.yd. Import:___0____ cu.yd.

Removal and Recompaction 1442 cu.yd.

20. Total Disturbed Area acres 0.92 ac
(including grading, clearing, and landscaping area)
Total Existing Impervious Surface Area:____ sq. ft.

Total Proposed Impervious Surface Area: 7,077_ sq. ft.

Flood Zone on FIRM:__________ Base Flood Elevation:___________ ft.

21. All slopes on private property adjoining streets, drainage channels, or other public facilities shall be graded not steeper than 2:1 for cut and fill unless specifically approved by the City Engineer on recommendation of the project's geotechnical/soilsconsultant.

22. All catch basins and drainage inlets shall be stenciled with the City of Malibu storm drain logo.

GRADING GENERAL NOTES:

MALIBU DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (CUTS and FILLS) [3312, 3313 & Malibu LCP 8.3]:

1. Cut material may only be exported to an appropriate landfill or a site permitted to accept material.

GRADING INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS [3317.6]:1. Initial Inspection: When the site has been cleared of vegetation and unapproved fill and it has been scarified, benched or otherwise prepared for fill. No fill shall have been placed prior to this inspection.

2. Toe Inspection: After the natural ground is exposed and prepared to receive fill and before any fill is placed.

3. Excavation Inspection: After the excavation is started and before the depth of excavation exceeds 10 feet.

4. Rough Inspection: When approximate final elevations have been established; drainage terrace, swales and other drainage devices necessary for the protection of the building site from flooding are installed; berms installed at the top of slopes; Submit the required “Rough Grading Reports”. Foundations shall not be excavated until the Building Official has approved Rough Grading.

5. Final Inspection: When grading has been completed, all drainage devices necessary to drain the building pad are installed, slope planting established and all irrigation systems installed. Submit the required “As-built Grading Plan” and “Notification of Completion”.

6. Subdrain Installation: Provide continuous inspection during subdrain excavation and installation. Continuous inspection by the Soils Engineer or his responsible representative shall be provided during all subdrain installations. [3313.2]

7. Fill Inspection:

7.1. After the fill emplacement is started and before the vertical height of the lifts exceeds 10 ft. [3313.2]

7.2. During preparation of natural ground and placement and compaction of fill.7.3. The soils engineer shall be present during the entire fill placement and compaction of fills that will exceed a vertical height or depth of 30 ft. or result in a slope surfacesteeper than 2horizontal to 1 vertical. [3313.7

8. Drainage Device Inspection: After forms and pipe are in place and before any concrete is poured.

9. Rough Grading: When all rough grading has been completed and erosion protection has been installed. The Geotechnical Engineer shall submit the final compaction report prior to the approval of rough grade.

COMPACTION TESTING REQUIREMENTS:

1. Fill shall be compacted (as determined by A.S.T.M. Soil Compaction Test D1557- Latest Version) throughout their full extent to [3313.4]:

2. A minimum relative compaction of 90% of maximum dry density within 40 ft. below finished grad, and

3. 93% of maximum dry density deeper than 40 ft. below finished grade4. Field density shall be determined by Sand-Cone Method, A.S.T.M. D1556 - Latest Version.

In fine-grained cohesive soils field density may be determined by the Drive-CylinderMethod, A.S.T.M. D-2937- Latest Version, provided not less than 20% of the required density tests, uniformly distributed, are by the Sand-Done Method. The method ofdetermining field density shall be shown in the compaction report. Other methods may be used if recommended by the Soils Engineer and approved in advance by the Building Official. [3313.4]

5. Sufficient tests of soil properties, including soil types and shear strength, shall be made during grading operations to verify compliance with design criteria. The results of such testing shall be furnished to the Building Official upon completion of grading operations, or when necessitated by field conditions upon request of the Building Official. [3313.8] One field density test to be made as follows:

5.1. One test for each two foot vertical left.5.2. One test for each 1,000 cubic yard of material placed.5.3. One test will be made at point approximately one foot below the fill slope surface on the basis of one test for each 1,000 square feet of slope surface but not less than onetest for each 10 foot of vertical slope height.

GENERAL NOTES:1. Any modifications of or changes in approved grading plans must be approved by the Building Official.

2. A copy of the grading permit and approved grading plan must be in the possession of a responsible person and available at the site.

3. This plan has been checked on the assumption that the fills shown will not be compacted. Place the following note no the plan stating: “Fills are uncompacted and not suitable for the support of structures. All foundations for future buildings are to be extended through the fill into natural ground.” If the fills are to be compacted, comply withcorrection numbers 94, 95 & 96.

4. Engineer must set grade stakes for all drainage devices and the contractor shall obtain inspection before pouring.

5. All storm drain work is to be done under continuous inspection by the Field Engineer.

Weekly status reports shall be submitted by the Field Engineer to the City Building Department.

6. Provisions shall be made for contributory drainage at all times.

7. Secure permission from (City Engineer), (State Highway Department) for construction, grading and/or discharge of drainage within street right-of-way.

8. Separate plans for temporary drainage and Wet Weather Erosion Control measure to be used during the rainy season must be submitted prior to October 1. The erosion control devices shown on said plans must be installed by not later than November 1 and maintained in operable condition until April 15. [3319.3]

9. The Grading Contractor shall submit a written statement verifying that the work done under his direction was performed in accordance with the approved plans and requirements of Chapter 33 of the Malibu Building Code or describing all variances from the approved plans and requirements of the code. [3318.1]

10. The Design Engineer verifies that this grading plan was prepared under my supervision in accordance with Section 3318.1 of the Malibu Building Code. All soils engineer and engineering geology recommendations were incorporated in plan. (Must be signed and dated by the Design Engineer.)

11. All recommendations included in the consultant's soil and geology reports must be complied with and are a part of the grading specifications.

12. Grading operations must be conducted under periodic geologic inspection with monthly inspection reports to be submitted to the City Building Department.

13. The consulting geologist must approve rough grading by final report. Final report must include an as-built geologic map.

14. Grading shall not be started without first notifying the Grading Inspector. A pre-grading meeting on the site is required before start of grading with the following people present:

Owner, Grading Contractor, Design Civil Engineer, Soil Engineer, Geologist, Grading Inspector, and when required, the Archaeologist and Paleontologist. The required inspections for grading will be explained at this meeting.

15. Fill shall be benched into competent material per City of Malibu Standard or Soils Engineer's directions.

16. All existing fills shall be approved by the Building Official or removed prior to placing additional fills.

City of Malibu
23815 Stuart Ranch Road ♦ Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 ♦ fax (310) 317 0950 ♦ www.ci.malibu.ca.us
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIC GRADING NOTES::

1. For reference, Section 1804.3 of the 2010 CBC states that the ground immediate adjacent to the foundation shall be sloped away from the building at a slope of not less than 5% for a minimum distance of 10 feet as measured perpendicular to the face of the structure. If physical obstructions or lot lines prohibit 10 feet of horizontal distance, a 5% slope shall beprovided to an approved alternative method of diverting water away from the foundation.Swales used for this purpose shall be sloped a minimum of 2% where located within 10 feet of the building foundation. Impervious surfaces within 10 feet of the building foundation shall be sloped a minimum of 2% away from the building. Exemption: Where climatic orsoil conditions warrant, the slope of the ground away from the building foundation ispermitted to be reduced to not less than 2%. The procedure used to establish the finalground level adjacent to the foundation shall account for additional settlement of the backfill (ICC, 2010).

2. All underground water lines and drainage lines shall be absolutely leak free. It is recommended that water remains, irrigation lines, and drainage lines be periodically checked for leaks for early detection of water infiltrating the underlying soils that couldcause detrimental soil movements. If a leak is detected at any time, it must be repaired immediately.

3. Landscape watering shall be held to a minimum while maintaining a uniformly moist condition without allowing the soil to dry out. Irrigation systems should be turned off when significant rain is in the forecast. During extreme hot and dry periods, adequate watering may be necessary to keep soil from separating or pulling back from the foundations or slabs.

4. Site area drains, catch basins, roof gutters, downspouts, and any subdrain outlets should be inspected periodically to insure that they are not clogged, damaged, and that they are functioning properly. In addition, cracks in paved surfaces shall be sealed to limit infiltration of surface waters.

SLOPE MAINTENANCE:

1. A rigorous slope maintenance program should be adopted to maintain the existing and any proposed slopes. The following recommendations should provide guidelines formaintenance of the slopes:

1.1. The slopes be landscaped. An experienced Landscape Architect could be consulted for recommendations regarding the type of landscape to use on the slope that would help to reduce surface erosion and would need minimum amount of irrigation such as drought resistant plant. Trees with rooting systems that could severely disturb theouter slope materials should be avoided and/or removed.

1.2. The moisture content of the slope outer face materials should be maintained close to the optimum throughout the year. Excessive watering or drying of the slope face must be avoided. Irrigation systems should be turned off when significant rain is in the forecast.

1.3. Proper surface drainage should be maintained. Drainage swales should be inspected and cleaned before the rainy season. Any erosion around and underneath the swales should be repaired to prevent further undermining of the subgrade around theswales.

1.4. If slope subdrain outlets are present on a slope, their locations should be carefully noted and extreme care should be taken to insure that the subdrain outlets do notbecome buried or blocked. Measures should be undertaken to insure that rodents or small animals cannot enter or reside in a subdrain outlet. If a subdrain outlet becomes buried or blocked, it must be located and/or the obstruction must beremoved immediately so that water may freely drain from the the subdrainage system. It should be noted that a buried or blocked subdrain outlet could preventgroundwater from draining from within the slope thus causing the saturation of the earth materials as well as as a rise in the hydrostatic pressures within the slope. Thiscondition could possibly lead to failure of the slope.

1.5. Burrowing by rodents disturbs the superficial materials and surface drainage conditions. If burrowing rodents are observed on or within the slope, they should beexterminated immediately and any disturbance to the slope should be corrected.

JOB No.:GW2480 DATE: 03/01/21
SHT. 3 DETAIL SHEET
CITY AND POOL CONTRACTOR NOTE:
1) OZONIZATION SYSTEM TO BE USED FOR THE POOL WATER
NO DISCHARGE TO THE STREET OR ANY RECIEVING WATERS IS ALLOWED. 2) " IT IS ILLEGAL TO DISCHARGE POOL, SPA OR WATER FEATURE WATERS TO A STREET OR DRAINAGE COURSE OR STORM DRAIN PER MMC 13.04.060 D 5". POOL CONTRACTOR TO POST ASIGN STATING THIS.

SHT. 4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLPLAN
ADDITIONAL GRADING GENERAL NOTES:

1. The Building Official shall approve stock piling of excess material prior to excavation.

2. The Field Engineer, as a condition of rough grade approval, shall provide a blue top with accompanying witness stake, set at the center of each pad reflecting the pad elevation for precise permits and a blue top with witness stake set at the drainage swale high point reflecting the high point elevation for Preliminary Permits.

3. All trench backfills shall be tested and approved by the Soil Engineer.4. The Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer shall, after clearing and prior to the placement of fill in canyons, inspect each canyon for areas of adverse stability and to determine the presence of absence of subsurface water or spring flow. If needed, subdrainswill be designed and constructed prior to the placement of fill in each respective canyon.

5. Subdrain outlets shall be completed at the beginning of the subdrain construction and survey for location. The as graded plan shall show all subdrain locations and elevations.

6. All cut slopes shall be investigated both during and after grading by the Engineering Geologist to determine if any slope stability problem exists. Should excavation disclose any geological hazards or potential geological hazards, the Engineering Geologist shall submit recommended remediation to the Building Official for approval.

7. Where support or buttressing of cut and natural slopes is determined to be necessary by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer, the Soil Engineer shall submit design, locations, and calculations to the Building Official prior to construction. The Engineering Geologistand Soil Engineer shall inspect and control the construction of the buttressing and certify to the stability of the slope and adjacent structures upon completion.

8. When cut pads are brought to near grade, the Engineering Geologist shall determine if the bedrock is extensively fractured or faulted and will readily transmit water. If considerednecessary by the Engineering Geologist and Soil Engineer, a compacted fill blanket will be placed.

9. The compaction report and approval from the Soil Engineer shall indicate the type of field-testing performed. Each test shall be identified with the method of obtaining the in-place density, whether sand cone or nuclear gauge, and shall be so noted for each test.

10. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the county Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City's LocalImplimation Plan (LIP), section 8.3..

11. The Engineer shall submit a Letter of Certification to the Building Official stating that the grading was done in compliance with the approved grading plan.

12. Preliminary soil and geology reports and all subsequent reports, as approved by the City of Malibu, are considered a part of the approved grading plan. All recommendations contained are to be complied with or revisions submitted for review.

13. All existing drainage courses through this site shall remain open until facilities to handle storm water are approved and functional; however, in any case, the permittee shall be held liable for any damage due to obstructing natural drainage patterns.

14. Roof gutters shall be installed to prevent roof drainage from falling on manufactured slopes.

Gutters shall be connected to non-erosive piping or other other method acceptable to the Building Official.

15. Any excavations adjacent to other property or structures are subject to the provisions of California Civil Code, Section 832, and is the responsibility of the permittee and/or owner.

16. Grading permits shall not be issued between November 1 and March 31 each year LCP section 17.2.1. projects approved for grading permit shall not receive grading permits unless the project can be rough graded before November 1.

PROJECT NUMBER:

TOTAL GRADING YARDAGE VERIFICATION CERTIFICATE

PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW LEVEL
City of Malibu
23815 Stuart Ranch Road ♦ Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 ♦ fax (310) 456-7650 ♦ www.malibucity.org
PROJECT ADDRESS: 6968 DUME DRIVE
All projects proposing land form alteration which involves more than 100 cubic yards of grading shall complete this form. The completed form must be provided at the time of Planning Division application for grading approval. All applicable cubic yardages shall be completed in the table. All calculationsutilized to estimate the cubic yardages indicated shall be attached to this form. This form and the required calculations must be prepared by a State of California Licensed Civil Engineer or a Licensed Surveyor. The form and the calculations shall be stamped and wet signed by the preparing party.

EXEMPT Non- R&R Understructure Safety Exempt Remedial Total Cut 1442 1191 0 237 0 2869
Fill 1442 143 0 492 0 2077
Total 2884 1334 0 729 0 4946
Import0 0 0 0 0 0
Export 0 0 000792
All quantities indicated shall be in Cubic Yards only.

R&R = Removal and Recompaction-R&R must be balanced.

Safety Grading is required grading for L.A. County Fire Depart. access approval beyond the fifteen foot minimum access and may include turnouts, hammerheads, turnarounds, and access roadway widening.

Remedial grading is grading recommended by a full site geotechnical or soils report prepared by alicensed geologist or soils engineer which is necessary to correct physical deficiencies on the site for the construction of a primary residence structure or access to the lot.

Imported means soil that is brought on to the site. Exported means soil that is leaving the site.Theinformation will be used to calculate the number of truck trips required for site preparation.

PREPARED BY:DATE:

PRINT NAMESIGNATURE
LIST OF CONSULTANTS:

CIVIL: GEOWORKS, INC.
5158 COCHRAN ST.,
SIMI VALLEY, CA., 93063
(805) 522-3206
GEOTECHNICAL: ALPINE GEOTECHNICAL
PO BOX 5417
VENTURA, CA. 93005
(805) 658-9000
SURVEYOR: LAND AND AIR SURVEYING
22761 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
SUITE #260MALIBU, CA., 90265 (310) 456-9381
ARCHITECT: BURDGE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
MALIBU, CA., 90265
(310) 456-5905(310) 456-2467 fax
ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL NOTES:

1. Subgrade soils shall be tested for Expansion Index prior to pouring footings or slabs; Foundation Plans shall be reviewed and revised by the Geotechnical Consultant, as appropriate.

2. All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of reinforcing steel.

3. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms, locations and elevations of all keyways and backdrains, and locations and elevations of allretaining wall backdains and outlets. Geologic conditions exposed during gradingmust be depicted on an as-built geologic map.

4. Prior to the placement of concrete slabs, the slab subgrade soils shall be pre-moistened to at least 130% of the optimum moisture content to the depth specified by the geotechnical engineer. The pre-moistened soils should be tested and verified tobe by the geotechnical engineer within one day prior to the placement of the moisturebarrier and sand.

PRINT NAME INT N A INT NMASIGNATURE SIGNA
Justin Holt
030121
100

BASEMENT
FF=214.74
FG=214.00
GARAGE
FS=PER
PLAN
FG=224.25
225.0TW219.0EG 225.0TW
219.0EG
SECTION 1
HEREON
POOL
PSP
5 3
4 3
CONC. DRIVEWAY IN RIGHT
OF WAY TO BE 6"
CONCRETE OVER 4" A.B.

FLUSH WITH GRADE, NO
CURBS

NO WORK IN RIGHT OF

WAY WITHOUT AN

ENCROACHMENTPERMIT
CONC. DRIVEWAY IN RIGHT
OF WAY TO BE 6"
CONCRETE OVER 4" A.B.

FLUSH WITH GRADE, NO
CURBS
228.0TW222.0EG
228.0TW222.0EG
228.0TW223.0EG
228.0TW223.0EG
232.5TW228.00FG
232.5TW228.00FG
232.5TW228.00FS
232.5TW228.00FG
225.5TG 223.5INV
221.8TG220.3INV
232.5TW228.00FG
SEPTIC
TANK
228.00FS

PROPOSED

RESIDENCE
FF=228.25
FG=227.50
1 3
TYP
DECK
AREAS
13 TYP
DECK
AREAS
23 TYP
LAWN
AREAS
TYP

PLANTER
AREAS
23 TYP
LAWN
AREAS
33 TYP

PLANTER
AREAS
33 6
3 6
3 7
3 7
3 7
3 REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTIONPER NOTE HEREON

REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTIONPER NOTE HEREON

ALL EXISTINGIMPROVEMENTS IN THEPUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYSHALL BE REMOVED REMOVE EXIST.SEPTIC SYSTEM
REMOVE EXIST.SEPTIC SYSTEM
F
PIT
8 3
8 3
S
PIT
S
PIT
F
PIT
DRIVEWAY - SECTION 1
1" = 4'
20'
12" MIN.
8" MIN.
2" SAND OVER COMPETENT

BEARING MATERIAL APPROVEDBY THE GEOTECHNICALENGINEER AND/OR GEOLOGIST 4" CONCRETE WITH #4 REBAR
@ 16" ON CENTER, EACH WAY
PL

PROPOSEDRETAINING
WALL 3' MAX
PREPARED BY: REVISIONS
.
# DATE
PREPARED FOR:

JOB No.:GW2480 DATE: 03/01/21

VALLEY EXECUTIVE TELECOM TRUST
c/o ROBYN MORUZZIBURDGE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
MALIBU, CA., 90265
(310) 456-5905
(310) 456-2467 fax
NOTES:

1. THE BUILDING, POOL AND RETAINING WALLS ARE PER A SEPARATE PERMIT. SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN.

2. OWNER AND OR CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL LAYOUT

AND DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES ARE EQUIVALENT TO THELAYOUT AND DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES THAT OUR SHOWN ON THIS GRADING PLAN BEFORE GRADING COMMENCES.

3. REFER TO THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR RECOMMENDATIONS ON OVEREXCAVATION AND SCARIFICATION.

4. ALL FINISH GRADES (DIRT) TO HAVE A MINIMUM 5% DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING FOR 10' MIN. OR TO A DRAINAGE DEVICE ALL OTHER FINISH GRADE (DIRT) DRAINAGE SHALL BE A MINIMUM 2% DRAINAGE TO AREA DRAINS PER PLAN.

5. ALL FINISH SURFACES TO HAVE A MINIMUM 1% DRAINAGE TO AREA DRAINS PER PLAN.

6. ALL DRAINAGE PIPE TO BE SDR 35, PVC (SIZE AS SHOWN) @ 1% MINIMUM SLOPE.

7. SUBDRAIN TO BE PLACED DURING CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO DOCUMENT LOCATION OF ALL SUBDRAINS AND OUTLETS.

8. ROOF DRAIN DOWN SPOUTS PER THE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ARE TO TIE INTO SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER THIS PLAN.

LEGEND:DN DOWNEG EXISTING GRADEES EXISTING SURFACEFF FINISH FLOORFG FINISH GRADEFS FINISH SURFACEFL FLOW LINEHP HIGH POINTINV INVERTNG NATURAL GRADEPL PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALL(PER SEPARATE PERMIT)R/W RIGHT OF WAY

TG TOP OF GRATETW TOP OF WALL

WS WATER SURFACEWW WINDOW WELL

STRUCTURAL WALL (PER SEPARATE PERMIT)

TRW TOP OF RETAINING WALL

PLANTER WALL (NO PERMIT REQUIRED)
REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTION NOTES:

1. ALL EXISTING FILL AND INCOMPETENT SURFACE SOILS WITHIN THE AREA

TO BE FILLED SHOULD BE REMOVED TO DENSE, NATURAL MATERIAL AND REPLACED AS PROPERLY COMPACTED FILL.

2. REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTION IS A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET BELLOW THE BOTTOM OF FOUNDATIONS. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT.

3. ALL REMOVAL AND RECOMPACTION OF THE TEST PITS TO BE ADDRESSED BY NOTE 1 ABOVE AND THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.

F PIT FUTURE SEEPAGE PITS PIT SEEPAGE PIT
101
Drain Pipe Per Plan
Compacted Soil
Slope to Drain
9" NDS Atrium Polyolefin Grate with U.V.

Inhibitors or approved equal
9" NDS ATRIUM GRATE WITH SANITARY SEWER& DRAIN TEE - DETAIL 3

NOT TO SCALE
Slope to Drain
NDS Drain Riser Pipe
(Length as Required)
or Approved Equal
Varies NDS Drain Tee or Approved Equal Drain Pipe Per Plan Compacted Soil
Slope to Drain
6" NDS Round Polyolefin Grate with U.V.

Inhibitors or approved equal
6" NDS ROUND GRATE WITH SANITARY SEWER & DRAIN TEE - DETAIL 2

NOT TO SCALE
Slope to Drain
NDS Drain Riser Pipe
(Length as Required)
or Approved Equal
Varies NDS Drain Tee or Approved Equal
Drain Pipe Per Plan
Hardscape per plan
Slope to Drain
4" NDS Brass Grate
4" NDS BRASS GRATE WITH SANITARY SEWER
& DRAIN TEE - DETAIL 1

NOT TO SCALE
Slope to Drain
NDS Drain Riser Pipe
(Length as Required)
or Approved Equal
Varies NDS Drain Tee or Approved Equal
10'
9'
3'-0"
9'
JPHV-1200

HIGH VELOCITY

STORMWATER INTERCEPTOR
8" CAP W/3" HOLE
8"x8"x8"
TEE
12" PVC
PIPE

OPEN FOROVERFLOW

3.5" HOLE

1.5" HOLE 8"x8"x8"
TEE
8" CAP W/3" HOLE

OPEN FOROVERFLOW

3.5" HOLE

1.5" HOLE

1.65'

3.06'
4'
- DETAIL 5
1212-HDI
12" LONG x 12" WIDE x 24" HIGH
FOR COMPLETE DESIGN,AND PRODUCT INFORMATION,CONTACT JENSEN PRECAST. 20" 20"
OPTIONAL6" OR 12"RISER
30"
12"
10" X 16" THINWALL KNOCKOUT.SLEDGE OUT ASREQUIRED.(TYP. 4 PLACES) 2"
24"
APPROX. WEIGHTOF BOX.: 602 LBS.

APPROX. WT.132 LBS. (6") OR263 LBS. (12")
H-20 TRAFFICBOX DESIGN LOAD:

DROP INLET WITH
WEIGHT: 15 LBS. ADJUSTABLE FRAME & GRATE
1212H GALVANIZED

GRATE AND FRAME
H-20 TRAFFIC RATED
12" BY 12" CONC. CATCH BASIN - DETAIL 6
1" = 1'
TEMP. 1:1CUT
ROUGH
GRADE
WALL BACKFILL/BACKDRAIN - DETAIL 7
1" = 4'

PROPOSEDFOOTING

PROPOSEDRETAINING
WALL
2' MIN.

PROPOSED
GRADE

PROPOSED

COMPACTED
FILL
3 4" GRAVEL OR
DELTA DRAIN 6000
OVER JIFFY SEAL140/60(RR24746)
4" Ø PERFORATED SUB DRAIN
(SDR-35 PVC), HOLES DOWN W/ 12"
OF 3 4" GRAVEL ON ALL SIDES,

WRAPPED IN GEOSYNTHETIC
FILTER FABRIC(MIRIFI 140 OR EQ.)
NOTES:

1. AT LEAST 9 INCHES SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE PLANTING SURFACE AND THE CREST OF EACH PLANTER

2. PLANTERS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON UNEVEN OR SLOPED SURFACES.

3. TOP SOIL/PLANTING MIX IS AT LEAST 18" DEEP.

4. TOP SOIL CONTAINS NO MORE THAN 30% COMPOST.

5. MINIMUM GRAVEL LAYER SHALL BE 12" DEEP.

6. DIRECT OVERFLOW DISCHARGE PER BUREAU OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.

7. PLANTING IS REQUIRED. CONSULT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR SPECIFIC PLANT TYPES.

PLAN NOT TO SCALE
4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE

WRAPPED IN NON-WOVEN
OVERFLOW DRAIN: 4" DIA. PVC PIPE WITH
ATRIUM GATE INLET AT 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE

DIRECT OVERFLOW DISCHARGE PER

BUREAU OF ENGINEERING & LADBS

REQUIREMENTS

GEOTEXTILE MEMBRANE
4" DIA. PVC PIPE

DOWNSPOUT WITH COBBLE

OR SPLASHBLOCK BELOW
(2'-6" MIN. INSIDE DIMENSION)

CAPPED AT ENDS

PER PLAN

PER PLAN
Min 2'-0" FROM DOWNSPOUT

SECTION FOR AT GRADE PLANTERS FOR ALL AREAS

NOT TO SCALE
4"-8" TYP.

RESERVOIR COURSE
34" WASHED GRAVEL LAYER
CHOKER: 14" - 12" WASHED P-GRAVEL

TOP SOIL / PLANTING MIX

COBBLE OR
2% TYP.
.005 MIN

ROOF DRAINAGE AND HARDSCAPE AREAS
2'-6" MIN.
3" MIN.
9" MIN.
18" MIN.
3'-3" MIN.
12" MIN.
(3" mulch layer within)

DIRECT OVERFLOW DISCHARGE

SPLASHBLOCK
3" MIN.

Freeboard

REINFORCED CMU BLOCK OR

PRE-CAST CONCRETE WITH
OVERFLOW DRAIN: 4" DIA. PVC PIPE WITH
ATRIUM GATE INLET AT 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE
LONGITUDINAL 4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC PIPE
WRAPPED IN NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE MEMBRANE.

NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE

COMPACTED BASE

PER PROJECT PLAN

MEMBRANE (OPTIONAL)

WATERPROOF MEMBRANE THROUGHOUT

UNIFORM MIX OF SAND AND ORGANIC
MATERIAL (EX: COMPOST); MIN INFILTRATIONRATE OF 5 INCHES PER HOUR. (DO NOT COMPACT)

PONDING
PLACED OVER 1" GRAVEL LAYER.
6"

PIPE PER PLAN
PREPARED BY: REVISIONS
.
# DATE
PREPARED FOR:

JOB No.:GW2480 DATE: 03/01/21

VALLEY EXECUTIVE TELECOM TRUST
c/o ROBYN MORUZZIBURDGE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
MALIBU, CA., 90265
(310) 456-5905
(310) 456-2467 fax
102
D
A C
B
E

BASEMENT
FF=214.74
FG=214.00
GARAGE
FS=PER
PLAN
FG=224.25
POOL
PSP

PROPOSED

RESIDENCE
FF=228.25
FG=227.50

SILT FENCE PER
SE-1 (TYP.)
SILT FENCE PERSE-1 (TYP.)

STABALIZED

CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
PER TC1 - ATTACHMENT "B"NOTES

SANDBAGS AROUND

VELOCITY REDUCER
2 BAGS HIGH2 BAGS WIDE
W/ (2) 4" PVC PIPES

OULTETTING CLEAR WATER

SANDBAGS AROUND
CATCH BASIN (TYP.)

SANDBAGS AROUND
CATCH BASIN (TYP.)

SANDBAGS AROUND
CATCH BASIN (TYP.)

CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA
PER WM8 - ATTACHMENT "B" NOTES

VEHICLE AREA
PER NS8,9,10 - ATTACHMENT "B" NOTESSTOCKPILE/CONSTRUCTION WASTEAREAPER WM-3 - ATTACHMENT "B" NOTES

CONSTRUCTION / EROSION CONTROL SANDBAG
STOCKPILE STORAGE AREAPER WM-1 - ATTACHMENT "B" NOTES
AB
C
D
SANITARY WASTE MANAGEMENT AREAPER WM9 - ATTACHMENT "B" NOTES E
PREPARED BY: REVISIONS
.
#DATE
PREPARED FOR:

EC1 - SCHEDULINGEC2 - PRESERVATION OF EXISTING VEGETATIONEC3 - HYDRAULIC MULCHEC4 - HYDROSEEDINGEC5 - SOIL BINDERSEC6 - STRAW MULCHEC7 - GEOTEXTILES & MATSEC8 - WOOD MULCHINGEC9 - EARTH DIKES AND DRAINAGE SWALESEC10 - VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICESEC11 - SLOPE DRAINSEC12 - STREAMBANKBSTABILIZATIONEC13 - POLYACRYLAMIDE NS1 - WATER CONSERVATION PRACTICESNS2 - DEWATERING OPERATIONSNS3 - PAVING AND GRINDING OPERATIONSNS4 - TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSINGNS5 - CLEAR WATER DIVERSIONNS6 - ILLICIT CONNECTION/DISCHARGENS7 - POTABLE WATER/IRRIGATIONNS8 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT CLEANINGNS9 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT FUELINGNS10 - VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCENS11 - PILE DRIVING OPERATIONSNS12 - CONCRETE CURINGNS13 - CONCRETE FINISHINGNS14 - MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT USENS15 - DEMOLITION ADJACENT TO WATERNS16 - TEMPORARY BATCH PLANTS SE1 - SILT FENCESE2 - SEDIMENT BASINSE3 - SEDIMENT TRAPSE4 - CHECK DAMSE5 - FIBER ROLLSSE6 - GRAVEL BAG BERMSE7 - STREET SWEEPNG AND VACUUMINGSE8 - SANDBAG BARRIERSE9 - STRAW BALE BARRIERSE10 - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION WE1 - WIND EROSION CONTROL
TC1 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EXITTC2 - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ROADWAYTC3 - ENTRANCE/OUTLET TIRE WASH WM1 - MATERIAL DELIVERY AND STORAGEWM2 - MATERIAL USEWM3 - STOCKPILE MANAGEMENTWM4 - SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROLWM5 - SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENTWM6 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENTWM7 - CONTAMINATION SOIL MANAGEMENTWM8 - CONCRETE WASTE MANAGEMENTWM9 - SANITARY/SEPTIC WASTE MANAGEMENTWM10 - LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT

EROSION CONTROL

WIND EROSION CONTROL

EQUIPMENT TRACKING CONTROL

NON-STORMWATER MANAGEMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT & MATERIAL POLLUTION CONTROL

TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL

GENERAL NOTES

1. IN CASE OF EMERGENCY, CALL AT

2. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 0.92 ACRES WDID N/A

3. A STAND-BY CREW FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES DURING THE RAINY SEASON (NOVEMBER 1 TO APRIL 15). NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON-SITE AND STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF EMERGENCY DEVICES WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT.

4. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN MAY BE REMOVED

WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IF THE GRADING

OPERATION HAS PROGRESSED TO THE POINT WHERE THEY ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED.

5. GRADED AREAS ADJACENT TO FILL SLOPES LOCATED AT THE SITE

PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE TOP OF SLOPE AT THE
CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. ALL LOOSE SOILS AND DEBRIS

THAT MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFF-SITE PROPERTY SHALL BE STABILIZED OR REMOVED FROM THE SITE ON A DAILY BASIS.

6. ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL DEVICES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM AND BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY.

7. A GUARD SHALL BE POSTED ON THE SITE WHENEVER THE DEPTH OF WATER IN ANY DEVICE EXCEEDS TWO FEET. THE DEVICE SHALL BE DRAINED OR PUMPED DRY WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH RAINSTORM.PUMPING AND DRAINING OF ALL BASINS AND DRAINAGE DEVICESMUST COMPLY WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP FOR DEWATERING OPERATIONS.

8. THE PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE AND CONTAIN POLLUTANTS WITHIN THE SITE IS LEFT TO THEDISCRETION OF THE FIELD ENGINEER. ADDITIONAL DEVICES ASNEEDED SHALL BE INSTALLED TO RETAIN SEDIMENTS AND OTHERPOLLUTANTS ON SITE.

9. DESILTING BASINS MAY NOT BE REMOVED OR MADE INOPERABLE BETWEEN OCTOBER 1 AND APRIL 15 OF THE FOLLOWING YEAR
WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

10. STORM WATER POLLUTION AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE MODIFIED, AS NEEDED, AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES, THE DESIGNAND PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEFIELD ENGINEER. PLANS REPRESENTING CHANGES MUST BESUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL IF REQUESTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

11. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO ELIMINATE THE DISCHARGE OF NONSTORM WATER FROM THE PROJECT SITES AT ALL TIMES.

12. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED

ON-SITE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIA SHEET FLOW, SWALES, AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE COARSE, OR WIND.

13. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION-RELATED

MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY FORCES OF WIND OR WATER.

14. FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS, AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE

STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO
CONTAMINATE THE SOILS AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL APPROVED
STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER.SPILLS MUST BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN APROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGESYSTEM.

15. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY OR ANY OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE

TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTED ON-SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE.

16. DEVELOPERS/CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE TO INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND BMP's ARE INSTALLED ANDFUNCTIONING PROPERLY IF THERE IS A 40% CHANCE OF 0.25 INCHES OR

GREATER OF PREDICTED PRECIPITATION, AND AFTER ACTUAL
PRECIPITATION. A CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION CHECK LIST ANDINSPECTION LOG SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL

TIMES AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL (COPIES OF THE SELF-INSPECTION CHECK LIST AND INSPECTION LOGS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST).

17. TRASH AND CONTRUCTION-RELATED SOILED WASTES MUST BE

DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT
CONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND.

18. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYSMUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS FROM BEINGDEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITION MUST BESWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS.

19. ANY SLOPES WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED OF VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED SO AS TO INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER.

20. AS THE ENGINEER/QSD OF RECORD, I HAVE SELECTED
APPROPRIATE BMPs TO EFFECTIVELY MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVEIMPACTS OF THIS PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON STORM WATER QUALITY. THE PROJECT OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE AWARE THAT THE SELECTED BMPs MUST BE INSTALLED, MONITORED, AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS.

CIVIL ENGINEERS/QSD SIGNATURE DATE

21. AS THE PROJECT OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER, "I

CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT AND ALL ATTACHMENTS WERE

PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION OR SUPERVISION IN ACCORDANCE

WITH A SYSTEM DESIGNED TO ASSURE THAT QUALIFIED PERSONNEL PROPERLY GATHER AND EVALUATE THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED.BASED ON MY INQUIRY OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHO MANAGE THESYSTEM OR THOSE PERSONS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR GATHERING

THE INFORMATION, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE INFORMATION SUBMITTED IS TRUE, ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AMAWARE THAT SUBMITTING FALSE AND/OR INACCURATE INFORMATION,FAILING TO UPDATE THE ESCP TO REFLECT CURRENT

CONDITIONS, OR FAILING TO PROPERLY AND/OR ADEQUATELY

IMPLEMENT THE ESCP MAY RESULT IN REVOCATION OF

GRADING AND/OR OTHER PERMITS OR OTHER SANCTIONS PROVIDED BY LAW.

OWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (PERMITEE) DATE

23. THE FOLLOWING BMP FROM THE "2009
CONSTRUCTION BMP HANDBOOK/PORTAL" MUST BE IMPLEMENTED
FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AS APPLICABLE. AS AN ALTERNATE, DETAILS FROM THE "CALTRANS STORM WATERQUALITY HANDBOOKS, CONDTRUCTION SITE BMP MANUAL" MAY BE USED. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

22. DEVELOPERS/CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONDSIBLE TO INSPECT ALL EROSION

CONTROL DEVICES AND BMPS ARE INSTALLED AND FUNCTIONING
PROPERLY AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT.

A CONSTRUCTION SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST AND INSPECTION LOG SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.

JOB No.:GW2480 DATE: 03/01/21

WIND CONTROL DETAIL
NTS

SILT FENCE DETAIL
NTS

CATCH BASIN SAND BAG DETAIL
NTS

CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL
NTS

CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAIL
NTS

VEHICLE/EQUIPMENT FUELING DETAIL
NTS
ATTACHMENT "B" NOTES

VALLEY EXECUTIVE TELECOM TRUST
c/o ROBYN MORUZZIBURDGE & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS, INC.
21235 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY
MALIBU, CA., 90265
(310) 456-5905
(310) 456-2467 fax

CIVIL ENGI IL EN NEERS/QSD SIGNATUR
030121
103
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4804 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
BIOLOGY REV~W

REFERRAL
City of Malibu Contract Biological Staff ‘ATE:
.~p7. FROM: City of Malibu Planning Department
APPLICANT I CONTACT: Rob n Moruzzi, Burd e & Associates Architects, I APPLICANT ADDRESS: 24911 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu CA 90265
APPLICANT PHONE #: 310 456-5905
APPLICANT FAX #:

APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
PLANNER: Richard Mollica
_______ The project review package is INCOMPLETE and; CANNOT proceed through Final Planning Review until corrections and conditions from Biological Review are incorporated into the proposed proiect design
(See Attached).

The project is APPROVED, consistent with City Goals & Policies associated with the protection of biological resources and ~N proceed through the Planning process.

The project may have the potential to significantly impact the following resources, either individually or cumulatively: Sensitive Species or Habitat, Watersheds, andlor Shoreline Resources and therefore Requires Review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB).

Sig ture Date
Additional requirements/conditions may be imposed upon review of plan revision Contact Information:

Dave Crawford, Contract Biologist, dcrawford~malibucity.org, (310) 456-2489, extension 277 Steven Hongola,, Contract Biologist, [email protected], (310) 456-2489, extension 301 Christopher Julian, Contract Biologist, [email protected], (310) 456-2489, extension 301 TO:

PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 17-088
JOB ADDRESS: 6968 DUME DR
91131 ~~17
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landscape TO: Malibu Planning Department andlor Applicant
FROM: City Contract Biologist Dv4~ ~‘f~1i-~’ b
/7~r/ ~ /
Rev 110816
104
City ofMalibu
Biology. Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road Malibu, California 90265-486 1
Phone (310) 456-2489 Fax (310) 317-1950 www.malibucity.org

BIOLOGY REVIEW SHEET

PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant: Robyn Moruzzi
(name and email robyn~buaia.com
address)
Project Address: 6968 Dume Drive
Malibu, CA 90265
P!anningCaseNo.: CDP17-Q88
Project Description: Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landscaping Date of Review: 11/28/17
Reviewer:

ContaCt ~oE.2atio
~~ye
~ie
ç~wf
(3 1PY~6
~d
:24~9 ~t ~.7L
Signature:

Email.
~
dcra~ord~malibuci~.org

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Site Plans:

Site Survey: ._
.. Grading Plans: . ~_.

OWTS Plan:
~ ~... ~tin gJE~.n 1.1 ~1~1
Hydrozone/Water 11/16/17
••_~BudgetCalculation
Bio Assessment:

Biolnventory: ~ ..~ .~
Native Tree Survey:

Native Tree Protection
Plan
Miscellaneous:

Previous Reviews:

REVIEW FINDINGS
Review Status: LI iNCOMPLETE: Additional information and/or a response to the listed review comments is required.

LI COMPLETE: All required information has been received and a conformance review shall be completed within the next 30 days.
~ APPROVED: The project has been approved with regards to biological impacts.

LI NOT APPROVED: The proposed project does not conform to the requirements ofthe MMC and/or LCP.

Environmental Review LI ~: This project has the potential to impact ESHA and may require review by the Board (ERB): Environmental Review Board pursuant to LIP Section 4.4.4

Recycled Paper
105
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDP 17-088
6968 Dume Drive
November 28, 2017
DISCUSSION:

1. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) for this project totals 312115 gallons per year.

The Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) totals 178621 gpy, thus meeting the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance Requirements.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. The project is recommended for APPROVAL with the following conditions:

A. Prior to installation ofany landscaping, the applicant shall obtain plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

B. Prior to or at the time of a Planning fmal inspection, the property owner/applicant shall submit to the case planner a copy of the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation that has been signed off by the Building Safety Division.

C. Prior to Final Plan Check Approval, if your property is serviced by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29, please provide landscape water use approval from that department.

For approval contact:

Nima Parsa
Address: 23533 West Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA 90265-4804 Email: [email protected] (preferred)
Phone: (310) 317-1389
Please note this action may require several weeks. As such, the applicant should submit their approved landscape plans to DPW as soon as feasible in order to avoid a delay at plan check.

D. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition (hedge), serving the same function as a fence or wall, occurring within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below six (6) feet in height. View impermeable hedges occurring within the front yard setback serving the same function as a fence or wall shall be maintained at or below 42 inches in height.

NOTE: The proposed cherry trees along the front yard are approvable, but may be difficult to maintain at 42 inches in height. It is recommended a smaller plant be selected.

E. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City ofMalibu, are prohibited.

F. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

G. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

Page2of3
Recycled Paper
106
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDP 17-088
6968 Dume Drive
November 28, 2017
H. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.

I. Grading!excavationlvegetation removal scheduled between February 1 and September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities. Surveys shall be completed no more than 5 days from proposed initiation of site preparation activities.

Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of the surveys shall be turned in to the City within 2 business days of completion of surveys.

J. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or any lighting of natural habitat areas.

K. Up-lighting oflandscaping is prohibited.

2. PRIOR TO ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all planning conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
-oOo
If you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact the City Biologist office at your earliest convenience.
cc: Planning Project file
Planning Department

Recycled Paper
107
RECEIVED t o a t u ~A N~ z zo~a
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 P~;~,p,~~~~G (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 317-1950 www.malibucity.org DEPT.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
TO: City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator DATE: (~qG' FROM: City of Malibu Planning Department
PROJECT NUMBER:

JOB ADDRESS:

APPLICANT /CONTACT:

APPLICANT ADDRESS:

APPLICANT PHONE #:

APPLICANT FAX #:

APPLICANT EMAIL:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

CDP 17-088
6968 DOME DR
Robyn Moruzzi, Burdge &Associates Architects, In
24911 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90265
310 456-5905
[email protected]
Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landscape
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City of Malibu Environmental Health Reviewer
Conformance Review Complete for project submittals reviewed with respect to the City of Malibu Local Coastal Plan/Local Implementation Plan (LCP/LIP) and Malibu Plumbing Code (MPC). The Conditions of Planning conformance review and plan check review comments listed on the attached review sheets) (or else handwritten below) shall be addressed prior to plan check approval.

Conformance Review Incomplete for the City of Malibu LCP/LIP and MPC. The Planning stage review comments listed on the City of Malibu Environmental Health review sheets) shall be addressed prior to conformance review completion.

OWTS Plot Plan: ❑ NOT REQUIRED
REQUIRED (attached hereto) ❑ REQUIRED (not attached)
Signature Date
The applicant must submit to the City of Malibu Environmental Health Specialist to determine whether or not an onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) Plot Plan approval is required.

The Environmental Health Specialist may be contacted Tuesday and Thursday from 8:00 am to 11:00 am, or by calling (310) 456-2489, extension 364.

Rev 141008
108
G~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~ 1 o a u
~ ~".~'." T Environmental Health •Environmental Sustainability Department '` ~ ~■~■►';" 23825 Stuart Ranch Road ~ Malibu, California ~ 90265-4861 '~~~~r% ;,~~~.,'"~M~!!!~ Phone (310) 456-2489 ~ Fax (310) 317-1950 • tii-t~-~~-.~~r~~~libt~citv.or~; `' ~4
J~~~ry~c~1 ~larcr "

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REVIEW SHEET

PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant: Robyn Moruzzi, Burdge &Associates
(name and email roy~bu~i~.~c~m
address)
Project Address: 6968 Dume Drive
Malibu, California 90265 . ........................................ ...........................................................9....................................................................................................................................,................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Plannin Case No.: CDP 17-088 Pro~ect Descri tion: ............_......_ .................J............................................~..................................................._.......................................................................................................................................................................P................................................................................._..................................................................................................... Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landsca e .Date.of Review: 24, 201.8
Reviewer:
.January
........__ ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................a.......................9......................................._......._,~~~ Matt Janousek ~ Si nature: r~...,~...................... .....................................................

Contact Information:
...........

Phone: 310) 456-2489 ext. 307 ~ Email: m'anousek m~libuci .or

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Architectural Plans: Burdge &Associates: Plans dated 9-13-2017 (submitted to Planning 9-13-2017), Updated plan dated 12-7-17; Updated plans received 1-11-2018 Gradin Plans: GeoWorks: Plans dated 9-8-2017, updated plan dated 11-22-17 OWTS Plan: Included in Alpine Geologic and Soils report dated 7-12-2017, Addendum letter II dated 12-7-17 .. ....

OWTS Report:
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Alpine Geologic and Soils report dated 7-12-2017, Addendum letter II dated 12-7-17; Addendum III letter dated 1-4-2018 received 1-11-2018
Geology Report: Alpine Geotechnical: Seepage Pit Percolation report for 6956 Dume Drive dated 7-20-2017 (property located north of the subject site); Geologic and Soils report dated 7-12-2017 (received 11-2-2017
Miscellaneous:

Previous Reviews: 9-25-2017, 11-15-17, 1-2-2018

REVIEW FINDINGS
Planning Stage: ~ CONFORMANCE REVIEW COMPLETE for the City of Malibu Local Coastal Program/Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and Malibu Plumbing Code (MPC). The listed conditions of Planning stage conformance review and plan check review comments shall be addressed...prior to...plan check..approval.~ ........................................................................................................................................................................................ ❑ CONFORMANCE REVIEW INCOMPLETE for the City of Malibu LIP and MPC.

The listed Planning stage review comments shall be addressed prior to conformance ..........................................._....................................................................................................................................................P......................................................_......................................................_........................_................_......_.....:._..............._......................_......_. review com letion.

OWTS Plot Plan: ❑ NOT REQUIRED
REQUIRED (attached hereto) ❑ REQUIRED (not attached)
Based upon the project description and submittal information noted above, a conformance review was completed for a new alternative onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) proposed to serve the onsite wastewater treatment and disposal needs of the subject property. The proposed OWTS meets the minimum requirements of the City of Malibu Plumbing Code, i.e. Title 28 of the Los Angeles County Code, .incorporating the California Plumbing Code, 2016 Edition with City of Malibu local amendments (Malibu Municipal Code Section 15.12; hereinafter MPC), and the City of Malibu Local Coastal Program/Local Implementation Plan (LIP). Please distribute this review sheet to all of the project consultants and, prior to final approval, provide a coordinated submittal addressing all conditions for final approval and plan check items.

Z;~1
T:~Env Health Review LogU'roject Review~Dume Dr\6968 Dume Dr\CDP 17-088U 80124_6968 Dume Dr CDP 17-088 EH Conf Rev CRC.docx Recycled Paper 109
Citv of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDP 17-088
6968 Dume Drive
January 24, 2018
The conditional conformance findings hereby transmitted complete the Planning stage Environmental Health review of the subject development project. In order to obtain Environmental Health final approval of the project OWTS Plot Plan and associated construction drawings (during Building Safety plan check), all conditions and plan check items listed below must be addressed through submittals to the Environmental Health office.

Conditions of Planning Conformance Review for Building Plan Check Approval 1) Final OWTS Plot Plan: A final plot plan shall be submitted showing an onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) design meeting the minimum requirements of the MPC, and the LCP/LIP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property, the proposed landscape plan for the developed property, and the proposed stormwater detention/dispersal plan.

The OWTS Plot Plan shall show essential features of the OWTS, existing improvements, and proposed/new improvements. The plot must fit on an 11" x 17" sheet leaving a 5" left margin clear to provide space for aCity-applied legend. If the plan scale is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18" x 22" for review by Environmental Health). 2) Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: A final OVUT~S design report and construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components proposed for use in the construction of the OWTS. All plans and reports must be signed by the California-registered Civil Engineer, Registered Environmental Health Specialist, or Professional Geologist who is responsible for the design, and is a registered practitioner with the City of Malibu. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted with the designer's signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).

The final OWTS design submittal shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems. The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day (gpd), and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing fixture schedule, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms.

Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design.
b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment systems) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter, ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and the design basis for engineered systems.
d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the OWTS. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit, subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system's geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected Pale 2 of 4
T:~Env Health Review Lo \Project Review~Dume Dr\6968 Dwne Dr\CDP 1 7-0880 50 1 24_6968 Dume Dr_CDP 17-OSS_F.H Conf Rev_CRC doc~ ,.
~:r.

Recycled Paper
110
Citv of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDP 17-088
6968 Dume Drive
January 24, 2018
subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day (gpd) and gallons per square foot per day (gpsfl. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gpd). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units, and building occupancy characteristics.
e. All OWTS design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the plan scale is such that more space than is available on the 11" x 17" plot plan is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18" x 22" for review by Environmental Health). Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans for are also required for review by Building &Safety and Planning.] 3) Existing OWTS to be Abandoned: Final plans shall clearly show the locations of all existing OWTS components (serving pre-existing development) to be abandoned and provide procedures for the OWTS proper abandonment in conformance with the MPC.
4) Worker Safety Note and Abandonment of Existing OWTS: The following note shall be added to the plan drawings included with the OWTS final design. "Prior to commencing work to abandon, remove, or replace existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) components an "OWTS Abandonment Permit" shall be obtained from the City of Malibu. All work performed in the OWTS abandonment, removal, or replacement area shall be performed in strict accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental and occupational safety and health regulatory requirements.

The obtainment of any such required permits or approvals for this scope of work shall be the responsibility of the applicant and their agents."
5) Building Plans: All project architectural plans and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted for Environmental Health review and approval. These plans must be approved by the Building Safety Division prior to receiving Environmental Health final approval. 6) Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted. 7) Operations &Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted. This shall be the same operations and maintenance manual proposed for later submission to the owner and/or operator of the proposed alternative onsite wastewater disposal system.
8) Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed alternative OWTS after construction shall be submitted. Please note only ori_ginal "wet signature" documents are acceptable.

1' \Env Health Review Lod=U'roject Review\Dume Dr\69GS Dume Dr\CDP 17-08SV 80124_6968 Dume Dr CDP 17-085_EH Conf Rcv CRC docx Recycled Paper 111
Citv of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDP 17-088
6968 Dume Drive
January 24, 2018
9) OWTS Covenant: A covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the City of Malibu Recorder's Office. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the OWTS serving subject property is an alternative method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of Malibu Uniform Plumbing Code. Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator. Please submit a certified copy issued by the City of Malibu Rer_nrcler
10) "Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator. 11) City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu geotechnical staff final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator. 12) City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.
13) Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specifications.
14) Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with M.M.C. Chapter 15.14, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an OWTS operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application.
.~.

If you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact the Environmental Health office at your earliest convenience.
cc: Environmental Health file
Planning Department
Pale 4 of 4
T:~Env I lealth Review Lou\Project Review\Dume Dr\6968 Dume Dr\CDP 17-OS8U 80124_6968 Dume Dr_CDP 17-0SS_FH Conf Rev_CRC.docx .,
Recycled Paper
112
6968 DUME DRIVE (CDP 17-088)
MALIBU, CA 90265
S.F.D.: 6 Bedrooms/105 Fixture Units (E)
TREATN~NT 3,634 Gallon MicroSepTec ES12
TANK: w/W Disinfection Unit (N)
ACTIVE: 2 - 6' x 45' BI w/ 5' Cap
(projected; B-1 , B-2 ) (N)
FUTURE : 2 - 6' x 45' BI w/ 5' Cap
,(projected; B-3,B-4) (N)
PERC RATE: 11,760 gpd/13.9 gpsf (prof; B-1)
4,473 gpd/5.3 gpsf (proj;•B-2)
5, 895 gpd/7 . 0 gpsf (prof ; B-3)
7,590 gpd/9.0 gpsf (prof; B-4)
DESIGNER: Michael J. Leary, CEG (1519)
REFERENCE: Alpine: Geologic and Soils
reports dated 7-12-2017,
12-7-2017, and 1-4-2018
NOTES:

1. This conformance review is for a 6 bedroom
(105 fixture units) new single family
dwelling. The new alternative onsite
wastewater treatment system conforms to the
requirements of the City of Malibu Plumbing
Code (MPC) and the Local Coastal Plan (LCP) .

2. This review relates only to the minimum
requirements of the MPC, and the LCP, and does
not include an evaluation of any geological or
other potential problems, which may require an
alternative method of review treatment.

3. This review is valid for one year, or until
MPC, and/or LCP, and/or Administrative Policy
changes render it noncomplying.

CITY OF I~VIALtBU
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTA.INABILITY DEPT
ENVIROt~iMENT.AL HEALTH
CONF~R.Il~[.A.~C:~ ~.E~IEW
JAN 2 4 2018
~ic,NnruKt:

THIS IS NOT AN APP ~"AL. FINAL APPROVAL
!S REQUIRED PRIOR O THE ISSUANCE OF ANY
C'O1v~TRUC'f1UN PERMITS. REF: BURDGE & ASSOCIATES SUBJECT: SEPTIC PLOT PLAN AG: 1421-G
0' ~ 10' 20'
~SGALE: 1" = 20'
:%~~,. LPINE GEOTECHN.ICAL, INC.

P.O. BOX 5417 VENTL~RA, CA 9.005
(30~)6~8-9000. [email protected]
SCALE: 1" = 20'
113

FIRE DEPARTMENT REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4804 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:

TO: Los Angeles County Fire Department
City of Malibu Planning Department DATE: 9/13/2017
JOB ADDRESS: 6968 DUME DR
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Robyn Moruzzi, Burdge and Associates APPLICANT ADDRESS: 24911 PCH
APPLICANT PHONE #:

APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landscape Malibu, CA 90265
PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 17-088
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: Fire Prevention Engineering Assistant
Compliance with the conditions checked below is required prior to Fire Department approval.

The project DOES require Fire Department Plan Review and Developer Fee payment ______ The project DOES NOT require Fire Department Plan Review ______ The required fire flow for this project is ________ gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch for a 1 hour duration. (Provide flow information from the water dept.) ______ The project is required to have an interior automatic fire sprinkler system. ______ Final Fuel Modification Plan Approval is required prior to Fire Department Approval ______ Conditions below marked “not approved” shall be corrected on the site plan and resubmitted for Fire Department approval.

App’d N/app’d
Required Fire Department vehicular access (including width and grade %) as shown from the public street to the proposed project. _____ ______ Required and/or proposed Fire Department Vehicular Turnaround _____ ______ Required 5 foot wide Fire Department Walking Access (including grade %) _____ ______ Width of proposed driveway/access roadway gates _____ ______

*County of Los Angeles Fire Department Approval Expires with City Planning permits expiration, revisions to the County of Los Angeles Fire Code or revisions to Fire Department regulations and standards. **Minor changes may be approved by Fire Prevention Engineering, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project maintains compliance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code valid at the time revised plans are submitted. Applicable review fees shall be required. __________________________________ _____________________

SIGNATURE DATE
Additional requirements/conditions may be imposed upon review of complete architectural plans.

The Fire Prevention Engineering may be contacted by phone at (818) 880-0341or at the Fire Department Counter:
26600 Agoura Road, Suite 110, Calabasas, CA 91302; Hours: Monday – Thursday between 7:00 AM and 11:00 AM Rev 04/21/10 mr
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Jackie Switzler 5/14/2021 1,250 Pool Draft Hydrant is not required. J.Switzler 114
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road • Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 • Fax (310) 317-1950 • www.malibucity.org

GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW SHEET
Project Information
Date: June 23, 2021 Review Log #: 4066
Site Address: 6968 Dume Drive
Lot/Tract/PM #: n/a Planning #: CDP 17-088
Applicant/Contact: Robyn Moruzzi, [email protected] BPC/GPC #:

Contact Phone #: 310-456-5905 Fax #: Planner: Didier Murillo Project Type: Demolish existing single-family residence, new single-family residential development, onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS)
Submittal Information
Consultant(s) / Report
Date(s):
(Current submittal(s) in Bold.)
Alpine Geotechnical, Inc. ( Leary, CEG 1519; Villafana, RCE 37354):
11-20-17, 7-12-17
Alpine Geotechnical, Inc. ( Leary, CEG 1519): 12-7-17
Revised architectural plans prepared by Burdge & Associates Architects dated March 26, 2021.

Revised grading plan (Sheet 2 of 4) prepared by GeoWorks, Inc., dated March 1, 2021.

Septic Plot Plan prepared by Alpine Geotechnical, Inc. dated July 2017.

Previous Reviews: 1-9-18, 10-6-17; Ref: Environmental Health Review Sheet dated 1-2-18, 11-15-17 and 9-25-17
Review Findings
Coastal Development Permit Review
The residential development project is APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective.

The residential development project is NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to approval.

Building Plan-Check Stage Review
Awaiting Building plan check submittal. Please respond to the listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ AND review and incorporate the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ into the plans.

APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. Please review the attached ‘Geotechnical Notes for Building Plan Check’ and incorporate into Building Plan-Check submittals.

NOT APPROVED from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to Building Plan-Check Stage approval.

Remarks
The referenced revised architectural plans and grading plan were reviewed by the City from a geotechnical perspective. The proposed development includes the demolition of the existing residence and garage and constructing a new 6,672 square foot two-story single-family residence with a 999-square foot basement and 115
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL25377) – 2 –
attached 800 square foot 3-car garage with storage, a new swimming pool and spa, a 400 square foot pool pavilion, a 576 square foot dining pavilion, retaining walls, decking, hardscape, flatwork, and landscaping.

Plan revisions include reorienting the attached garage to be west-facing and lowering the garage finish floor elevation and garage court by one foot, reconfiguring the driveway approach to the garage, and eliminating the stacked retaining walls (combined height >9 feet) previously proposed near the south property line. The more southerly of the stacked retaining walls was partially constructed (without a permit) and is the subject of code enforcement. The south driveway approach to garage will now be supported by a five-foot high (max.) retaining wall located 21 feet from the south property line. Revised grading quantities consist of 2,884 yards of removal and recompaction; 1,191 yards of cut and 143 yards of fill under structure; 237 yards of cut and 492 yards of fill non-exempt; and 792 yards of export. A new OWTS will be installed on the property that consists of a treatment tank system and two 5’ diameter x 45’ BI seepage pits with 5’ caps and 100% expansion.

Planning Stage Conditions of Approval:

1. The illegally constructed retaining wall along the south property line, which is the subject of code enforcement, should either be included on a site demolition plan as an item to be removed as part of the proposed development, or depicted on the site plan and identified as an item to be removed. This should include a requirement that the grade in the area of the wall construction be restored to the condition that existed prior to the wall being constructed.

2. The revised architectural plans contain several inconsistencies which should be corrected prior this project going to public hearing before the Planning Commission:
a. The revised garage finish floor elevation is listed as 225.25 feet (with adjacent garage court elevation 225.0 feet) on Sheets A-0.1 and A-1.2; however, on the West Elevation (Sheet A-2.1), South Elevation (Sheet A-2.2), and Section B (Sheet A-3.1) it is shown as elevation 226.25 feet (with garage court elevation 226.0 feet), and on the North Elevation (Sheet A-2.2) it is shown as elevation 226.5 feet.
b. The Site Plan and Partial Site Plan on Sheet A-0.1 have the proposed garage labeled as “detached”; however, the plans clearly illustrate that the garage is attached to the residence.

Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments:

1. Please submit a fee of $1,016.00 to City geotechnical staff for building plan check review.

2. The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall review the revised grading plan and discuss any revisions to the design of the seepage pits (capping depths), based on the proposed grading revisionsin the area of the seepage pits.

3. The Project Geotechnical Consultant should provide recommendations for grade restoration at the location of the illegally constructed site retaining wall to be removed.

4. The structural consultant should evaluate the potential for lateral surcharge of the proposed basement sidewalls due to adjacent foundations/structures and/or daylighting bedding. Mitigation measures should be recommended, as necessary.

5. Please clearly show the limits and depths of the R & R grading for proposed structures and subgrade for flat work/paving/decking on the grading plans. Include the yardages on the plans.

6. Please provide reduced setback letters from the OWTS, geotechnical and structural consultants for any reduced setbacks between the OWTS components and foundations, as applicable. 116
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MAL25377) – 3 –

7. The Project Geotechnical Consultant recommended removal and recompaction of uncompacted backfill of the exploratory test pits and borings across the site. This recommendation, including the location of the exploratory borings/test pits, should be shown on the Grading Plan.

8. Section 7.4 of the City’s geotechnical guidelines requires a minimum thickness of 10 mils for vapor barriers beneath slabs-on-grade. Building plans shall reflect this requirement.

9. Include a detail for the swimming pool hydrostatic relief valve on the swimming pool plans.

10. The following note needs to be included into the project grading and swimming pool plans. ‘Prior to the placement of concrete slabs, the slab subgrade soils shall be pre-moistened to at least 130% of the optimum moisture content to the depth specified by the geotechnical engineer. The pre-moistened soils should be tested and verified to be by the geotechnical engineer within one day prior to the placement of the moisture barrier and sand.’

11. Include a note on the OWTS plans stating, “The Project Engineering Geologist shall observe and approve the installation of the seepage pits and provide the City inspector with a field memorandum(s) documenting and verifying that the seepage pits were installed per the approved OWTS plans.”

12. Two sets of final grading, retaining wall, swimming pool and spa, pool pavilion, dining pavilion, and residence plans (APPROVED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY) incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet must be reviewed and wet stamped and manually signed by the Project Engineering Geologist and Project Geotechnical Engineer. City geotechnical staff will review the plans for conformance with the Project Geotechnical Consultants’ recommendations and items in this review sheet over the counter at City Hall. Appointments for final review and approval of the plans may be made by calling or emailing City Geotechnical staff.

Please direct questions regarding this review sheet to City Geotechnical staff listed below.

Engineering Geology Review by: 6/23/2021
Michael B. Phipps, C.E.G. #1832, Exp. 7-31-22 Date
Engineering Geology Reviewer, x269
Email: [email protected]
Geotechnical Engineering Review by: 6/23/2021
Lauren J. Doyel, G.E. #2981, Exp. 6-30-21 Date
Geotechnical Engineering Reviewer, x384
Email: [email protected]
This review sheet was prepared by representatives of Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. and GeoDynamics, Inc., contracted through Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., as an agent of the City of Malibu.

117
City of Malibu
– GEOTECHNICAL –

NOTES FOR BUILDING PLAN-CHECK
The following standard items should be incorporated into Building Plan-Check submittals, as appropriate:

1. One set of grading, retaining wall, swimming pool and spa, pool pavilion, dining pavilion, and residence plans, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet, must be submitted to City geotechnical staff for review. Additional review comments may be raised at that time that may require a response.

2. Show the name, address, and phone number of the Project Geotechnical Consultant(s) on the cover sheet of the Building and Grading Plans.

3. Include the following note on Grading and Foundation Plans: “Subgrade soils shall be tested for Expansion Index prior to pouring footings or slabs; Foundation Plans shall be reviewed and revised by the Project Geotechnical Consultant, as appropriate.”

4. Include the following note on the Foundation Plans: “All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of reinforcing steel.”

5. The Foundation Plans for the proposed project shall clearly depict the embedment material and minimum depth of embedment for the foundations in accordance with the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.

6. Show the onsite wastewater treatment system on the Site Plan.

7. Please contact the Building and Safety Department regarding the submittal requirements for a grading and drainage plan review.

8. A comprehensive Site Drainage Plan, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations, shall be included in the Plans. Show all area drains, outlets, and non-erosive drainage devices on the Plans. Water shall not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over descending slopes.

Grading Plans (as Applicable)

1. Grading Plans shall clearly depict the limits and depths of overexcavation, as applicable.

2. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms, locations and elevations of all keyways and back drains, and locations and elevations of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets.

Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map. This comment must be included as a note on the grading plans.

Retaining Walls (As Applicable)

1. Show retaining wall backdrain and backfill design, as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant, on the Plans.

2. Retaining walls separate from a residence require separate permits. Contact the Building and Safety Department for permit information. One set of retaining wall plans shall be submitted to the City for review by City geotechnical staff. Additional concerns may be raised at that time which may require a response by the Project Geotechnical Consultant and applicant.
118

PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:

TO:

City of Malibu Planning Department
Public Works Department
REVISED DATE 03/29/2021
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Robyn Moruzzi, Burdge and Associates APPLICANT ADDRESS: 24911 PCH
APPLICANT PHONE #: (310)773-7305
APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demo ESFR, NSFR, OWTS, Pool, Landscape Malibu, CA 90265
PROJECT NUMBER: CDP 17-088
JOB ADDRESS: 6968 DUME DR
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: Public Works Department
The following items described on the attached memorandum shall be addressed and resubmitted.

The project was reviewed and found to be in conformance with the City’s Public Works and LCP policies and CAN proceed through the Planning process.

SIGNATURE DATE
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Rev 120910
7/8/21
119
1 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - Planning and Plan Check Reviews/6968 Dume Drive/CDP 17-088/01 Planning Stage/The Public Works/1st Submittal/6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA.docx Recycled Paper
City of Malibu

M E M O R A N D U M
To: Planning Department
From: Public Works Department
Jorge Rubalcava P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
Date: July 8, 2021
Re: Proposed Conditions of Approval for 6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA The Public Works Department has reviewed the plans submitted for the above referenced project.

Based on this review sufficient information has been submitted to confirm that conformance with the Malibu Local Coastal Plan (LCP) and the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) can be attained. Prior to the issuance of building and grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions.

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

1. This project proposes to construct a new driveway within the City’s right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the proposed driveway.

The driveway shall be constructed of either 6-inches of concrete over 4-inch of aggregate base, or 4-inches of asphalt concrete over 6-inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

2. This project proposes to construct a new driveway within Caltrans’ right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department approval of the grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from Caltrans for the proposed driveway.

GRADING AND DRAINAGE

3. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development LIP Section 17.3.1 that:
• Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
• Includes grading on slopes greater than 4:1.
120
2 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - Planning and Plan Check Reviews/6968 Dume Drive/CDP 17- 088/01 Planning Stage/The Public Works/1st Submittal/6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA.docx Recycled Paper
• Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

4. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section

8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.

5. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
• Public Works Department General Notes
• The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks).
• The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated.
• The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading plan.
• If the property contains trees that are to be protected, they shall be highlighted on the grading plan.
• If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist.
• Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan.
• Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

6. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMP’s shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, post-construction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements. 121
3 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - Planning and Plan Check Reviews/6968 Dume Drive/CDP 17- 088/01 Planning Stage/The Public Works/1st Submittal/6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA.docx Recycled Paper

7. The applicant shall label all City/County storm drain inlets within 250 feet from each property line per the City of Malibu’s standard label template. A note shall be placed on the project plans that address this condition.

STORMWATER

8. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be provided prior to the issuance of the Grading/Building permits for the project. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but not limited to:

Erosion Controls Scheduling
Preservation of Existing
Vegetation
Sediment Controls Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Water Conservation Practices
Management Dewatering Operations
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste
Management
All Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

9. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development.

The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A). The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.
122
4 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - Planning and Plan Check Reviews/6968 Dume Drive/CDP 17- 088/01 Planning Stage/The Public Works/1st Submittal/6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA.docx Recycled Paper

10.A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site.

The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
• Site Design Best Management Practices (BMP’s)
• Source Control BMP’s
• Treatment Control BMP’s that retains on-site the Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technical infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site. • Drainage Improvements
• A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMP’s for the expected life of the structure.
• A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measures installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. • The WQMP shall be submitted to Public Works and the fee applicable at time of submittal for the review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the certificate of occupancy.

MISCELLANOUS

11.The developer’s consulting engineer shall sign the final plans prior to the issuance of permits.

12.The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, alagecides or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
• The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
• There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and • The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries) Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.
123
5 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - Planning and Plan Check Reviews/6968 Dume Drive/CDP 17- 088/01 Planning Stage/The Public Works/1st Submittal/6968 Dume Drive CDP 17-088 COA.docx Recycled Paper
The applicant shall also provide a construction note on the plans that directs the contractor to install a new sign stating, “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa or water feature waters to a street, drainage course or storm drain per MMC 13.04.060(D)(5).” The new sign shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.

124
May Story Pole Photos
From Center of Dume Drive From Front Gate
From Inside the Property Facing West From Center of Dume Drive 125
City Of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
Phone (310) 456-2489
www.malibucity.org
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
The Malibu Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday, September 20, 2021, at 6:30 p.m. for the project identified below via teleconference only in order to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19, pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Order N-08-21 and the County of Los Angeles Public Health Officer’s Order.

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 17-088, SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 19-030, DEMOLITION PERMIT, AND CODE VIOLATION NO. 20-014, NO. 19-023 - An application for the demolition of the existing single-family residence, construction of a new two-story, single-family residence, swimming pool, onsite wastewater treatment system, and after-the-fact retaining walls, grading and front yard gates, including a site plan review for construction of a pitched roof over 18 feet in height, not to exceed 28 feet LOCATION / APN / ZONING: 6968 Dume Dr / 4466-015-015 / Rural Residential-One Acre (RR-1) APPLICANT / OWNER: Burdge and Associates / Highlands Investment Group, LLC APPEALABLE TO: City Council
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorical Exemption CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303(a) and 15303(e) APPLICATION FILED: September 13, 2017
CASE PLANNER: Didier Murillo, Associate Planner, [email protected] (310) 456-2489, ext. 353
A written staff report will be available at or before the hearing for the project, typically 10 days before the hearing in the Agenda Center: http://www.malibucity.org/agendacenter. Related documents are available for review at City Hall or by contacting the Case Planner You will have an opportunity to testify at the public hearing; written comments which shall be considered public record, may be submitted any time prior to the beginning of the public hearing. If the City’s action is challenged in court, testimony may be limited to issues raised before or at the public hearing. To view or sign up to speak during the meeting, visit www.malibucity.org/virtualmeeting.

LOCAL APPEAL - A decision made by the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within 10 days and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org/planningforms, in person, or by calling (310) 456-2489, ext. 245.

RICHARD MOLLICA, Planning Director Date: August 26, 2021 126
Supplemental
Commission Agenda Report
Chair Jennings and Members of the Planning Commission
Prepared by: Didier Murillo, Associate Planner
Approved by: Richard Mollica, Planning Director
Date prepared: September 16, 2021 Meeting Date: September20, 2021 Subject: Coastal Develoiment Permit No. 17-088, Site Plan Review No. 19- 030, Demolition Permit No. 19-023, and Code Violation No. 20-014 — An ar~lication for the demolition of an existing single-family residence, and construction of a new two-story, single-family residence and associated develorment
Location: 6968 Dume Drive, not within the appealable
coastal zone
APN: 4466-015-015
Owner: Highlands Investment Group LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 21-68 determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, approving Coastal Development Permit No. 17-088 to allow the demolition of an existing 2,257 square foot, single-story single-family residence, construction of a new 7,472 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 999 square foot basement, swimming pool, onsite wastewater treatment system, associated development, and afterthe-fact retaining walls, grading and front yard gates, including Site Plan Review No. 19- 030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height, up to 28 feet for a pitched roof, and Demolition Permit No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single-family residence and onsite development located in the Rural Residential-One Acre zoning district at 6968 Dume Drive (Highlands Investment Group LLC).

DISCUSSION: Staff is herein including pictures taken from the neighboring residence to the south at 6980 Dume Drive and correspondence from the owner of this property.

These pictures were not previously provided because the neighbor has not agreed to formally accept these pictures as part of the request for a primary view determination.

The original report describes staff’s meeting with the neighbor and a description of the To:

Planning Commission
Meeting
09-20-2 1
Item

5.C.

127
current views depicted in these pictures were included as part of the analysis. In short, the views depicted from these pictures are mostly obstructed by existing, dense and mature trees in the direction of the proposed residence and protected views of impressive scenes are not expected to be obstructed by the portions of the proposed residence in excess of 18 feet in height. No other changes to the original report and findings are necessary. Based on information provided to date, staff has a complete project and staff is responsible to proceed with the application in a timely manner while using the current site conditions as the baseline for staffs recommendation for approval of the project.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Staff Photos from 6980 Dume Drive

2. Correspondence received on September 13, 2021

128
C)
mz-I-~
~,
Photos taken from 6980 Dume Drive, dated 8/24/2021
V
~•.~:‘
&~,• ~t.’ I
~I.

I.

View looking East
r ‘I’
• -•
~
~:‘
L4 ~
View looking Northeast
~‘
d ~‘,.
—~ I-- •‘
:4.

A ~
View looking North onto subject CDP 17-088
I — L I•~-~• I,,;’
~• 17
.1
‘7 ••
\
View looking South
‘-3 lv’.’I’. ‘A ~s’r fT’1117!Li
129
Patricia Salazar
Subject: FW: proposed september 20th planning commission hearing Attachments: Planning Commission Roster - Public.pdf
From: John roesler
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2021 8:57 AM
To: Didier Murillo <[email protected]>
Cc: Johana Valencia <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: proposed september 20th planning commission hearing Good morning Didier and Johana,
I wanted to bring you both up to date and plead / request to have the September 20th planning commission hearing relating to discussion / potential approval of the proposed development project next to my residence postponed by I month. The reason for this is that, relating to the (previously unbeknownst to me) protection of the sycamore tree(s) and related restrictions in trimming these trees, it has proven impossible for me to get an arborist to obtain the official permit to trim the branches from the tree which, in substantial part, are blocking my mountain views. I have already scheduled for the work to be done, at enormous cost to me I might add, which will also include complete removal of the pine tree, which is similarly contributing to blocking my mountain view. I’m more than happy to discuss the situation by zoom with either I both of you, and prove that I am working as fast as possible to obtain the permit and get this work done. You were both physically present on my back deck for the unofficial view determination discussion, and you know that I have a potentially significant mountain view which is currently primarily blocked by my own trees, and that the quality of this view, if improved, would affect the decision to approve / disapprove the height variance that the developer is requesting. It took some time for me to understand my lawful view rights, relating to the proposed development next door, and I should be allowed sufficient time to implement a permitted tree trimming plan, which will allow me to exercise the protection of my view rights relating to the proposed development. This was the intent of the view protection ordinance after all. I am not asking for an unreasonable amount of time to get the work done, I month, so I hope that you will consider this request favorably. If not, I’ll potentially be forced to exercise my rights at the hearing through legal representation and / or appeal of any approval decision for the proposed development, which will cost everyone significant time and money, and certainly more substantially delay any progression of the development project.

Sincerely,
John Roesler, MD
On Monday, August 30, 2021, 08:37:58 AM PDT, Didier Murillo <dmurillo(ã~malibucitv.org> wrote:

Good morning Dr. Roesler,
Sorry for the late response. I showed the pictures to our Assistant Director last week. Based on the pictures we are going to move forward with the recommendation of approval of the project.

Based on the pictures I took it is not expected that the project would block any impressive scenes of the mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines. We are moving forward with the project as recommended. However, please be advised that 1 ATTACHMENT 2
130
you may present picture evidence closer to the hearing date that may show otherwise, for the Planning Commissioners consideration. There was quite a bit of overgrown foliage that you may trim. However, please don’t remove any trees from your property that may be protected trees. It is always in your best interest to submit any plans prior to any work to avoid Code Enforcement. Typically, we would ask that you coordinate with our counter staff for new work. However, since Johana is familiar with your property you can coordinate with her directly.

Here are the upcoming milestones for the hearing date for your reference. • The project is scheduled for the September 20th Planning Commission Hearing (via zoom and starts at 6:30 p.m.) • The draft report is due tomorrow August 31st
• The final report and agenda will be published and available for your review on September 9th~ • You may submit any correspondence, pictures, etc., for the Planning Commissioners consideration any time until the date of the hearing.
• When the agenda gets published you will be provided with an email that goes to our Planning Commissioners along with information on how to register as a public speaker. You will have three minutes to provide the commission with your concerns.

Based on our conversation you mentioned that you would be agreeable to the project being redesigned to align the proposed new house next to your house to avoid any views from your backyard deck. I will include that in the staff report and will inform the project team of such.

If any new information arises, I will send you an email.

Thank you.

Didier Murillo I Associate Planner I City of Malibu
From: john roesler
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 1:32 PM
To: Didier Murillo <dmurillo(~malibucitv.org>
Subject: update?
Hi Didier,
Any follow-up on our in person discussion / informal view survey re development next door to my property?
Thanks,
John
131

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 21-68

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

MALIBU, DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND
APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 17-088 TO ALLOW FOR THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING 2,257 SQUARE FOOT, SINGLESTORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 7,472 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A 999 SQUARE FOOT BASEMENT, SWIMMING POOL, ONSITE

WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMEN, AND

AFTER-THE-FACT RETAINING WALLS, GRADING, AND FRONT YARD GATES, INCLUDING SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 19-030 FOR CONSTRUCTION IN EXCESS OF 18 FEET IN HEIGHT, UP TO 28 FEET FOR A PITCHED ROOF, AND DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 19-023 FOR THE DEMOLITION OF THE

EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ONSITE DEVELOPMENT

LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ONE ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 6968 DUME DRIVE (HIGHLANDS INVESTMENT GROUP LLC)
The Planning Commission ofthe City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On September 13, 2017, an application for Coastal Development Permit (CDP) No. 17-088 was submitted to the Planning Department by applicant, Burdge and Associates, on behalfof the property owners, Valley Executive Telecom Trust. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) for review.

B. On April 30, 2019, staff deemed the project complete.

C. On June 14, 2019, a Code Enforcement action was taken on the property for a new electric front gate, block wall along the side property line, grading and drainage pipes being constructed without the benefit ofplanning approval and building permits. Code Violation (CV) No. 20-014 was added to the subject application.

D. On March 27, 2020, the applicant submitted revised plans to the Planning Department.

E. On May 28, 2020, Planning Department staff conducted a site visit to document story poles, site conditions, and surrounding area.

F. On May 29, 2020, an updated grant deed was submitted by the applicant for the new property owners, Highlands Investment Group, LLC.

G. On June 16, 2020, the applicant posted a Notice of Coastal Development Permit Application on the subject property.

H. On June 25, 2020, a Notice ofPlanning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper ofgeneral circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius ofthe subject property. 132
Resolution No 2 1-68

I. On July 20, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to a date uncertain at the applicant’s request.

J. On January 7, 2021, a Notice ofPlanning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

K. On February 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to the March 1, 2021 Planning Commission meeting at the applicant’s request.

L. On March 1, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and continued the item to a date uncertain at the applicant’s request.

M. On August 26, 2021, a Notice ofPlanning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

N. On September 20, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staffreport, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Commission found that this project is listed among the classes ofprojects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(l)(1) — Existing Facilities and 15303(a) and (e) New Constmction. The Planning Commission has further determined that none ofthe six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on substantial evidence contained within the record and pursuant to Local Coastal Program Local Implementation Plan (LIP) including Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9, the Planning Commission adopts the analysis in the agenda report, incorporated herein, the findings of fact below, and approves CDP No. 17-088 to allow for the demolition ofan existing 2,257 square foot, single-story single-family residence, construction ofa new 7,472 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a 999 square foot basement, swimming pool, onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS), associated development, and after-the-fact retaining walls, grading and front yard gates, including Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height, up to 28 feet for a pitched roof, and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single family residence and onsite development located in the Rural Residential One-Acre (RR- 1) zoning district located at 6968 Dume Drive.
133
Resolution No 21-68

The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment system standards requirements. With the inclusion ofthe proposed SPR and DP, the project, as conditioned, has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. The proposed project is located in the RR-1 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses. A single-family residence and associated development are permitted uses. The proposed project has been reviewed for conformance with the LCP by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, LACFD, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and WD29. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project conforms to the LCP and MMC in that it meets all applicable residential development standards, with the inclusion of the requested SPR and DP.

2. The proposed project meets the development policies ofthe LCP and MMC, with the inclusion of the SPR and MM and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. Therefore, the proposed project has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

B. Site Plan Review for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27.5) SPR No. 19-030 from the development standards contained in LIP Section 13.27 will allow construction ofa single-family residence over 18 feet in height at a maximum height of28 feet for a pitched roof.

1. The project has been reviewed for conformance with all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and a detailed site investigation, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC.

2. SPR No. 19-030 would allow for the construction ofa new two-story residence on a lot that is currently developed with a one-story residence constructed in the 1950s. Staff visited the project site on May 28, 2020, photo-documented the story poles and evaluated the project for conformance with applicable development standards. Staffrevisited the site on August 24, 2021, to confirm story poles. Neighboring properties located along Dume Drive are developed with a mix of one- and two-story residential structures of similar size with mature landscaping. As demonstrated with the story pole photographs, due to the location ofthe proposed development towards the center of the property, the portions of the proposed development over 18 feet in height will have limited visibility from Dume Drive. Furthermore, the adjacent neighbor located at 6980 Dume Drive requested staffto evaluate potential view impacts ofthe Santa Monica Mountains. Staff conducted a site visit and, based on the pictures taken, the portions ofthe residence in excess of 18 feet in height are not expected to block views of any impressive scenes ofthe Santa Monica mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines. Based on existing nearby development, the proposed project is expected to blend with the surrounding built environment and is not expected to have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. Therefore, the portions of the structures in excess of 18 feet are not anticipated to adversely affect neighborhood character. 134
Resolution No 2 1-68

3. On May 28,2020, staff visited the subject parcel and, on August 24,2021, revisited to view the story poles and surrounding neighborhood. Based on these site visits, staff determined that the proposed residence will not be visible from scenic areas or scenic roads. The proposed residence is not expected to create obstructions or encroachments into public views and provides the maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by LIP Chapter 6.

4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law, and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits and licenses from the City of Malibu and other related agencies.

5. The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that the project is located in an area that has been identified for residential use. The proposed project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan and LCP. The goals and policies of the General Plan intend to maintain rural residential character in this area, and all components of the project are consistent with these goals.

The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that it conforms to the residential land use designation and all applicable development standards.

6. Based on the visual impact analysis (aerial photographs, story poles, and site visits), staff has determined that the proposed construction above 18-feet in height is not expected to obstruct visually impressive scenes ofthe Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17). Furthermore, staff conducted a couple of remote meetings with the adjacent neighbor (6980 Dume Drive) to discuss the project. The most recent inperson meeting took place, on August 24,2021, to discuss the project revisions and potential view impacts. The adjacent neighbor continues to express concerns with the location ofthe development, particularly potential impacts to his view of the Santa Monica Mountains. The concerns were provided to the project applicant. However, based on staff’s inspections and present site conditions, the portions of the residence in excess of 18 feet in height do not affect this neighbor’s views of impressive scenes.

C. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability ofthe site from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

2. The project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by the City geotechnical staff and the City Public Works Department, does not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or fire hazards due to the project design.

3. The project, as designed and conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, and LACFD. These specialists and agency determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity. There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would result in less site disturbance. 135
Resolution No 2 1-68

5. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources.

D. Demolition Permit Findings (MMC Chapter 17.70)

1. The proposed project includes the demolition ofthe existing single-family residence, attached garage, and abandonment of the existing OWTS. Conditions of approval, including the recycling of demolished materials, have been included to ensure that the proposed project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts.

2. This CDP application is being processed concurrently with DP No. 19-023, and approval ofthe demolition permit is subject to the approval of CDP No. 17-088.

SECTION 4. Planning Commission Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves CDP No. 17-088, SPR No. 19-030, and DP No. 19-023, subject to the following conditions.

SECTION 5. Conditions of Approval.

1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemni& and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City’s actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor ofany person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity ofany ofthe City’s actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City’s expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City’s actions concerning this project.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the project described herein. The scope of work approved includes:
a. Demolition ofthe existing 1,857 square foot, single-family residence; b. Demolition the existing 400 square foot, attached garage; c. Abandon the existing OWTS;
d. A new 7,472 square foot two-story single-family residence with attached three-car garage (6,672 sq. ft. habitable and 800 sq. ft. garage), plus a 999 square foot basement (not included in TDSF);
e. Two trellised patios totaling 400 square feet and 576 square feet, respectively (not included in TDSF);
f. Swimming pool and spa measuring 20 feet wide by 60 feet long; g. Associated pool and spa equipment (to be fUlly screened); h. In-ground gas fire pit;
i. Trash enclosure outside the required front yard;
j. Site fencing and gates;
k. New landscaping and hardscaping;
I. Grading;
m. Retaining walls to not exceed six feet in height; and n. Installation of new OWTS.
136
Resolution No 21-68

o. Discretionary Requests:
i. SPR No. 19-030 for construction in excess of 18 feet in height but to exceed 28 feet for a pitched roof; and
ii. DP No. 19-023 for the demolition of the existing single-family residence, attached garage and OWTS.

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions ofapproval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition No. 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department date stamped July 28. 2021. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs, notarizes and returns the Acceptance ofConditions Affidavit accepting the conditions of approval set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans, including the items required in Conditions No. 6 to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. This resolution, signed and notarized Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit, major remodel policy and signed agreement (if applicable) and all Department Review Sheets attached to the agenda report for this project shall be copied in their entirety and placed directly onto a separate plan sheet behind the cover sheet ofthe development plans submitted to the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department for plan check, and the City of Malibu Public Works Department for an encroachment permit (as applicable).

7. The CDP shall expire ifthe project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit, unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event ofan appeal, the CDP shall expire ifthe project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decisionmaking body or withdrawn by the appellant.

8. Any questions ofintent or interpretation ofany condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

9. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Coastal Engineer, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical staff, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

10. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the Malibu Municipal Code and the Local Coastal 137
Resolution No 21-68

Program. Revised pians reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.

11. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals have been exhausted.

12. The property owner must submit payment for all outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

Cultural Resources

13. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 1 7.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

14. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease, and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 ofthe California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification ofthe coroner. Ifthe coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall noti& the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

15. Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
a. Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60- watt incandescent bulb);
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

16. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

17. No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one-foot candle. 138
Resolution No 21-68

18. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting ofthe shore is prohibited.

19. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

20. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

21. Three violations ofthe conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.

Fencing/Walls/Screening

22. The height of fences and walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination oftwo or more walls.

23. Any above-ground equipment shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

Site-Specific Conditions

24. No exterior lighting is proposed as part ofthis project; therefore, no new exterior lighting is permitted as part ofthis project.

25. The project as approved is near the maximum TDSF allowed for the subject parcel.

Converting the trellis covered roofs or any other changes that would increase TDSF over the maximum allowed shall not be permitted unless an appropriate application is submitted to the Planning Department and the Planning Director confirms that these changes to the project comply with applicable TDSF standards.

Demolition/Solid Waste

26. Prior to demolition activities, the applicant shall receive Planning Department approval for compliance with conditions of approval.

27. The applicant/property owner shall contract with a City approved hauler to facilitate the recycling ofall recoverable/recyclable material. Recoverable material shall include but shall not be limited to: asphalt, dirt and earthen material, lumber, concrete, glass, metals, and drywall.

28. Prior to the issuance ofa building/demolition permit, an Affidavit and Certification to implement waste reduction and recycling shall be signed by the Owner or Contractor and submitted to the Environmental Sustainability Department. The Affidavit shall indicate the agreement of the applicant to divert at least 65 percent (in accordance with CalGreen) of all construction waste from the landfill.

29. Upon plan check approval ofdemolition plans, the applicant shall secure a demolition permit from the City. The applicant shall comply with all conditions related to demolition imposed 139
Resolution No 2 1-68

by the Building Official.

30. No demolition permit shall be issued until building permits are approved for issuance.

Demolition ofthe existing structure and initiation ofreconstruction must take place within a six-month period. Dust control measures must be in place ifconstruction does not commence within 30 days.

31. The project developer shall utilize licensed subcontractors and ensure that all asbestoscontaining materials and lead-based paints encountered during demolition activities are removed, transported, and disposed of in full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations.

32. My building or demolition permits issued for work commenced or completed without the benefit of required permits are subject to appropriate Investigation Fees as required in the Building Code.

33. Upon completion of demolition activities, the applicant shall request a final inspection by the Building Safety Division.

Construction I Framing

34. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy ofthe Construction Management Plan. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers, not within the public right of way.

35. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to plan check submittal.

36. When framing is complete, a site survey shall be prepared by a licensed civil engineer or architect that states the finished ground level elevation and the highest roof member elevation. Prior to the commencement of further construction activities, said document shall be submitted to the assigned Building Inspector and Planning Department for review and sign off on framing.

37. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.

38. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount ofequipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessaiy; and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.

39. All new development, including construction, grading, and landscaping shall be designed to incorporate drainage and erosion control measures prepared by a licensed engineer that incorporate structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMP5) to control the volume, velocity and pollutant load of storm water runoff in compliance with all requirements contained in LIP Chapter 17, including:
140
Resolution No 2 1-68

a. Construction shall be phased to the extent feasible and practical to limit the amount of disturbed areas present at a given time.
b. Grading activities shall be planned during the southern California dry season (April through October).
c. During construction, contractors shall be required to utilize sandbags and berms to control runoff during on-site watering and periods of rain in order to minimize surface water contamination.
d. Filter fences designed to intercept and detain sediment while decreasing the velocity of runoff shall be employed within the project site.

40. For the transportation of heavy construction equipment and/or material, which requires the use of oversized-transport vehicles on State highways, the applicant / property owner is required to obtain a transportation permit from the California Department ofTransportation.

Color and Materials

41. Every residence shall have an exterior siding ofbrick, wood, stucco, metal, concrete or other similar material, except that reflective, glossy, polished and/or roll-formed type metal siding is prohibited.

Biology/Landscaping

42. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.

Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.

43. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

44. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner/applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.

45. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition serving the same flmction as a fence or wall (also known as a hedge) located within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of six feet. A hedge located within the front yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of42 inches. Three violations ofthis condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.

46. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

47. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth). 141
Resolution No 21-68

48. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

49. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote or copper arsenate.

50. My site preparation activities, including removal of vegetation, between February 1 and September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist at least five days prior to initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results ofnesting bird surveys shall be submitted to the City within two business days of completing the surveys.

51. Up-lighting of landscaping is prohibited.

52. Use of wood chips and shredded rubber is prohibited anywhere on the site. Flammable mulch material, including shredded bark, pine needles, and artificial turf, are prohibited between zero and five feet of a structure. Non-continuous use of flammable mulch (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) is allowed between 5 and 30 feet from the eave/overhang ofa structure with limited application areas. My mulch materials (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) are allowed 30 feet or more from a structure with no limitation on application area.

Public Works

53. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department prior to the con~mencement of any work within the public right-of-way. The driveway shall be constructed ofeither six inches of concrete over four inches ofaggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

54. Several existing private improvements are located within the public right-of-way, such as (but not limited to) landscaping, railroad ties, and fencing. These improvements are required to be removed as part of this project and must be shown on the plans. The applicant / property owner shall place notes on the development plans for the removal of existing encroachments within the public right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval ofthe grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the removal of the private improvements within the public right-of-way.

55. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4 to 1.

Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4 to 1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading 142
Resolution No 2 1-68