Malibu City Council
February 18, 2026

PLEASE DOWNLOAD THE AGENDA DOCUMENT FOR

INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING
Meeting Agenda
CC260218_AGENDA.PDF
Item 1A
Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 23-004 (29738 Cuthbert Road, APN 4469-041-011, Owner Malibo LLC, Appellant Charlotte Frieze Jones, for Malibu Park Neighbors Group) CC260218_ITEM 1A.PDF
CC260218_ITEM 1A_SUPPLEMENTAL.PDF

1. Documents:

2. Documents:

Malibu City Council
Special Meeting Agenda
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
2:00 P.M. – CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
City Hall – Council Chambers
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Zoom Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87985644870

GUIDE TO THE CITY COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS AND DECORUM
ROLE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER: The presiding officer of the City Council, who shall be the Mayor, shall be responsible for maintaining the order and decorum of meetings. It shall be the duty of the presiding officer to ensure that these rules of procedure and decorum are followed at all times. The presiding officer shall maintain control of communication between Councilmembers, between the Council and the public, and chair each meeting in a fair and impartial manner. It shall be the duty of each Councilmember to support the presiding officer in maintaining the order and decorum of Council meetings.

On specific agenda items, except for public hearings, Councilmembers may question any person addressing the City Council at the conclusion of all public testimony on that agenda item before the Council. Councilmembers shall not engage any member of the public in a dialogue with themselves other Councilmembers, city staff or other members of the public. Specific rules for public hearings are described in more detail below.

MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE: Members of the audience shall not engage in disorderly or boisterous conduct, including clapping, whistling, stamping of feet, or other acts which disturb, disrupt, impede or otherwise disturb the orderly conduct of the City Council meeting. Persons addressing the City Council shall not engage in disorderly conduct which disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct or Council meetings. Any person who so disrupts a Council meeting may, at the discretion of the presiding officer or a majority of the City Council, be subject to ejection from that meeting.

MEETING PARTICIPATION: Malibu City Council meetings are held in-person. Members of the public may participate in-person or remotely. In order to participate remotely, you must be present in the Zoom Webinar during the item that you would like to speak on and use the Raise Hand feature to request to speak when the Mayor calls the item. When you join the Zoom Webinar you may see a pop-up asking you to enter an email address, but a valid email address is not required. It is strongly recommended that those who wish to participate do so in person as zoom participation is not guaranteed. While the City intends to allow zoom participation if possible, the meeting will not be cancelled or continued if technical difficulties impact the ability to accept public participation over Zoom. In such case only in-person participation will be allowed.

If you would like to speak in-person, you must complete and submit to the Recording Secretary a Request to Speak form at the meeting prior to the beginning of the item being announced by the Mayor.

Remote and in-person participants will have three (3) minutes to speak on each item on the agenda. For items on City Council Special Meeting Agenda Page - 2 - February 18, 2026 the agenda, in-person participants may also surrender their time to speak by deferring one (1) minute to another in-person speaker, not to exceed a total of eight (8) minutes. The speaker wishing to defer time must be present when the item is heard and their form must be submitted with the speaker form for the individual they are deferring time to. Speakers are taken in the order slips are submitted or hands are raised.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: For Public Hearings involving land use matters the appellant and applicant will be given 15 minutes each to present their position to the City Council, including rebuttal time. Following the initial presentations from the appellant and applicant and public testimony Councilmembers may address questions to any of the speakers, members of the public in attendance, chairpersons or a designated representative of city commissions, boards or committees, city staff or consultant. Following the question period, the appellant and applicant will have the opportunity to present rebuttal before the public hearing is closed.

Any written comments or audiovisual materials from the applicants, appellants, and/or their representatives, including any that they intend to present at the hearing, must be submitted ten (10) business days in advance, by 5:00 p.m. on February 3, 2026. Any written comments or audiovisual materials from members of the public, including any that they intend to present at the hearing, must be submitted three (3) business days in advance, by 5:00 p.m. on February 12, 2026. No additional materials from any party or the public will be accepted after these deadlines. All materials should be emailed to [email protected].

VIEW THE MEETING: The meeting will be live streamed at www.malibucity.org/video, www.youtube.com/CityofMalibu, and via Zoom Webinar.

Two p.m. Regular Session
Call to Order - Mayor
Roll Call - Recording Secretary
Pledge of Allegiance
Report on Posting of Agenda – January 16, 2026
Approval of Agenda

1. Ordinances and Public Hearings
A. Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 23-004 (29738 Cuthbert Road, APN 4469-041-011, Owner Malibo LLC, Appellant Charlotte Frieze Jones, for Malibu Park Neighbors Group)
Recommended Action: Either: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 26-05 denying Appeal No. 24-010, determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire No. 23-004, Site Plan Review No. 23- 026 and Demolition Permit No. 24-020, an application to allow for the construction of a 4,620 square-foot addition to a like-for like rebuild of a destroyed single-family residence approved under Planning Verification-Woolsey Fire No. 21-034, enlargement of the existing swimming pool and spa, reconfiguration of the existing driveway, hardscape, landscape, grading, improvements to the existing tennis court; demolition of existing hardscape and landscape, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS); including a site plan review for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height located in the Rural ResidentialTwo acre (RR-2) zoning district at 29738 Cuthbert Road (Malibo LLC); or 2) Direct staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

City Council Special Meeting Agenda Page - 3 - February 18, 2026 Staff Contact: Community Development Director Bundy, 456-2489, ext. 229 Adjournment
Future Regular Meetings
Monday, February 23, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Monday, March 9, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Monday, March 23, 2026 5:30 p.m. Regular City Council Meeting City Hall Council Chambers Copies of the staff reports or other written documentation relating to each item of business described above are on file in the office of the City Clerk, Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, California, and are available for public inspection during regular office hours, which are 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Friday. Written materials distributed to the City Council within 72 hours of the City Council meeting are available for public inspection immediately upon distribution in the City Clerk's office at 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, California (Government Code Section 54957.5.b.2). Copies of staff reports and written materials may be purchased for $0.10 per page.

The City Hall phone number is (310) 456-2489. To contact City Hall using a telecommunication device for the deaf (TDD), please call (800) 735-2929 and a California Relay Service operator will assist you. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Community Development Director Yolanda Bundy, (310) 456-2489, ext. 229. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADD Title II].

I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Regular and Adjourned Regular meeting agendas may be amended up to 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Dated this 16th day of January 2026 at 6:15 p.m.

Kelsey Pettijohn, City Clerk

Agenda Item #1.A.

Council Agenda Report
To: Mayor Riggins and Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Aakash Shah, Contract Planner
Reviewed by: Yolanda Bundy, Community Development Director Tyler Eaton, Assistant Community Development Director
Approved by: Rob Duboux, Interim City Manager
Trevor Rusin, Interim City Attorney
Date prepared: January 16, 2026 Meeting Date: February 18, 2026 Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 Regarding Coastal Development Permit No. 23-004 (29738 Cuthbert Road, APN 4469-041-011, Owner Malibo LLC, Appellant Charlotte Frieze Jones, for Malibu Park Neighbors Group)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Either: 1) Adopt Resolution No. 26-05 (Exhibit A) denying Appeal (AP) No. 24-010 (Exhibit A), determining the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and approving Coastal Development PermitWoolsey Fire (CDPWF) No. 23-004, Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 23-026 and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 24-020, an application to allow for the construction of a 4,620 square-foot addition to a like-for like rebuild of a destroyed single-family residence approved under Planning Verification-Woolsey Fire (PVWF) No. 21-034, enlargement of the existing swimming pool and spa, reconfiguration of the existing driveway, hardscape, landscape, grading, improvements to the existing tennis court; demolition of existing hardscape and landscape, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS); including a site plan review for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height located in the Rural Residential-Two acre (RR-2) zoning district at 29738 Cuthbert Road (Malibo LLC); or 2) Direct staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION: N/A.

DISCUSSION: The matter is an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of CDPWF No. 24-003, SPR No. 23-026, and DP No. 24-020, an application to allow for an addition City Council Meeting
02-18-26
Item

1.A.
1

Agenda Item #1.A.
to a replacement single-family residence approved under PVWF No. 21-034, and associated development. The appellant, Charlotte Frieze Jones, representing the Malibu Park Neighbors Group,(a group of residents appealing this application, refer to Exhibit B), subsequently filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to approve the project.

Project Background
Following the Woolsey Fire, and in response to outcry by property owners seeking ways to streamline the rebuild process in the most efficient and cost-effective manner possible, the City Council directed staff to identify ways to ease the regulatory burden on firedamaged properties and provide flexibility for properties that sought to rebuild beyond the limits of the standard “like-for-like plus 10%” exemption in the City’s Local Coastal Program (LCP). The goal was to create a pathway that allowed reasonable expansion and eliminated red-tape/shortened the processing time for permits for fire victims bringing forward such projects.

To implement this approach, staff allowed “stacked” applications where the City would simultaneously apply the nonconforming structure provisions with the coastal development permit (CDP) exemptions for improvements to existing single-family structures and for structures destroyed by natural disaster (LCP Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Sections 13.5, 13.4.1 and 13.4.6). Staff interpreted these sections to mean that once a Planning Verification was issued for the replacement structure (including the 10% increase), additional improvements could be reviewed as “improvements to existing single-family residences” even before the replacement home was constructed. This allowed property owners to pursue additional development—up to 50% beyond the size of the destroyed home—through an Administrative Plan Review rather than a CDP, or if it exceeded 50% through a CDP just for the addition. This allowed the replacement home to retain its legal nonconformities and then apply for an addition as if the like-for-like replacement structure was already built. These provisions were intended to ensure that fire victims were not penalized simply because their homes had been destroyed by allowing an applicant to use the CDP exemption for additions to single family homes even though the home had not yet been constructed, or through a CDP solely for the addition.

California Coastal Commission staff later took the position that this interpretation was inconsistent with the LCP. Specifically, they asserted that the exemption for improvements to existing single-family residences could only apply after the replacement home was substantially constructed or nearing a certificate of occupancy. Based on this interpretation, the California Coastal Commission objected to the City’s practice of approving “stacked” or sequential exemptions before the home physically existed. In response, the City Council directed staff to discontinue the stacked-project approach. The application associated with the current staff report is a product of that earlier process As a result, any application submitted today to exceed the 10% disaster-rebuild allowance requires a full CDP for the entire project, and the project is reviewed comprehensively at one time. While applicants may still maintain legal nonconformities for the replacement 2

Agenda Item #1.A.
home itself, any additional development beyond the 10% threshold cannot rely on exemptions or other processes and must go through the CDP process for the entire project.
1 Project Overview
The subject parcel is partially located within the Appealable Jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission (CCC) as depicted on the Post-LCP Certification Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Map of the City of Malibu. The LCP Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) Overlay map (Figure 1) shows a mapped blueline stream crossing the property diagonally along the parcel’s frontage. The replacement structure approved under the PVWF is sited within 100 feet of the stream but the proposed additions under this application are sited at least 100 feet away from the stream, consistent with the requirements of the LCP.

Figure 1: Aerial Photograph with ESHA Overlay and Stream Source: Malibu City GIS
The lot is 2.03 acres. The subject property cannot be seen from public scenic areas, including Pacific Coast Highway, beaches, and parks. The planned Zuma Ridge Trail is 1 It should be noted that an applicant can still rebuild a nonconforming like-for-like single family home without a CDP, and then build an addition to that structure without a CDP—so long as the like-for-like structure is built before the addition is applied for.
3

Agenda Item #1.A.
located approximately 30 feet north of the project site according to the LCP Parklands Map. That trail is currently unimproved and therefore unused. The proposed additions are not anticipated to significantly impact public views of the Santa Monica Mountains or Pacific Ocean from public viewing areas, and the proposed project is anticipated to blend in with surrounding development.

The previously existing single-family residence, detached garage, guest house, shed, stable/storage room, and pool house were destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. On September 28, 2020, the Planning Department approved PVWF No. 21-034 for a like-forlike rebuild of the single-family residence and swimming pool. PVWF No. 21-034 included a 3,872 square foot replacement structure to be rebuilt. A portion of the approved singlefamily residence under the PVWF application encroaches into the 100-foot buffer from an LCP-mapped stream. This portion of the home had existed prior to the fire and was replaced in-kind. The replacement structure met the CDP exemption criteria contained in LIP Section 13.4.6.

The proposed project includes a 4,620 square foot addition to the previously approved residence. Exterior site improvements include 16,932 square feet of total impermeable coverage, expanding the existing swimming pool and spa, view permeable front yard fencing and gate (not to exceed six feet in height), outdoor seating area for the tennis court, new landscaping, hardscaping and OWTS. The proposed project includes an SPR for construction of a residence over 18 feet in height, up to 24 feet with a flat roof. The proposed Total Development Square Footage (TDSF) is 8,492 square feet out of the allowable 8,500 square feet.

On August 5, 2024, the Planning Commission considered the item. After deliberation, the Planning Commission approved the project on a 3-2 vote. The August 5, 2024 staff report, and related correspondence are attached as Exhibit C. Appeal No. 24-010 was filed on August 15, 2024 (Exhibit B). The appeal was submitted by Charlotte Frieze Jones, who is the primary contact on behalf of all the individuals who appealed this project and are listed in the appeal letter. The Planning Commission staff report goes into greater detail regarding the project. The videos regarding the Planning Commission deliberation on the items can be found on the City’s website at https://www.malibucity.org/662/PublicMeeting-Video-Archive

APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
The appellant, Charlotte Frieze Jones, provided written and oral testimony during the public hearing before the Planning Commission. In the appeal, the appellants contend that the findings are not supported by the evidence, and that the decision was contrary to law.

The specific arguments are summarized below in italics. The full text of the appeal documents can be found in Exhibit B.

Appeal Item 1. Rebuilds must meet all the requirements described in the City of Malibu Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Chapter 13.4.6 Structures Destroyed by the natural disaster.
4

Agenda Item #1.A.

Staff Response
The appellant claims the project was not processed properly. The appellant’s claim that the project is not a “like-for-like” replacement structure pursuant to LIP Section 13.4.6.

The like-for-like rebuild was approved under application PVWF No. 21-034. The time to appeal that project, or challenge it in court, has now expired. The project in front of before the Council is solely for a CDP for the proposed addition to the replacement structure. As discussed above, during the Woolsey Fire rebuild process, the City Council allowed, for a limited time, “stacked” applications where an approved like-for like replacement structure could apply (before the replacement structure was constructed) for additional square footage and site improvements that exceeded the “like-for-like plus 10 percent” allowed under the LIP exemption for structures destroyed in a natural disaster (LIP Section 13.4.6).

Under this “stacked” process the addition could be processed as if the replacement structure had already been constructed. In this case, which meant the addition would be looked at separate from the replacement structure, thus, the CDP is only for the addition.

This project was processed under those regulations in place at the time and was consistent with the Council policies at the time.

Appeal Item 2. The Project as proposed is not an addition to the existing single-family residence but a new single-family residence, and the project is submitted under two different applications.

Staff Response
The proposed project is an addition to the approved single-family residence under PVWF No. 21-034. The applicant submitted a like-for-like rebuild application (PVWF No. 21-034).

Upon approval of this application, they submitted another application CDPWF No. 23-004 for improvements to the approved project.

Some portions of the approved residence under PVWF No. 21-034 encroached within 100 feet of the stream (Figure 2a and 2b), as those parts were a like for like replacement. The subject application is for the addition of 4,620 square feet to the approved residence.

Under this application, only the new portions of the residence are being reviewed.

Figure 2a. Site Plan Showing Blueline Stream, 100 feet buffer and encroachment within 100 feet buffer
5

Agenda Item #1.A.

Source: Project Plans
6

Agenda Item #1.A.

Figure 2b. Plan Showing the Portion of the residence approved under PVWF 21- 034.

Source: Project Plans
Appeal Item 3. The Project, as proposed, does not meet the General Coastal Development Permit findings.

Staff Response:

The project is located in the RR-2 residential zone district, an area designated for residential uses. In addition, the subject parcel is not located between the first public road and the sea. The project site is located inland and not located along the shoreline. The proposed project is for additions to the existing residence approved under the Planning Verification and other exterior site improvements.

The applicant considered project alternatives such as relocating the addition elsewhere on the subject parcel or nearer to the stream; however, the relocation would result in greater site disturbance than what currently is proposed.

The LCP ESHA Overlay map shows a stream diagonally across the parcel’s frontage.

However, the proposed additions under this application are located outside the 100-foot ESHA buffer and the additions will not expand the required fuel modification of the structure. Additionally, LIP Section 4.4.4(B) exempts Environmental Review Board (ERB) review for additions to existing structures that do not require additional fuel modification 7

Agenda Item #1.A.
impacts to ESHA. The Planning Director, at the time, determined that review by the ERB was not required for this project.
8

Agenda Item #1.A.

Appeal Item 4. The size of the residence should be smaller.

Under the LIP, a smaller project is permitted. The maximum allowable TDSF represents the largest residence that may be considered, but it is not a guaranteed right. The LIP states that a structure may be "up to" the maximum TDSF; however, both the Planning Commission and the Council retain full discretion to deny the proposed addition and require a smaller project
Staff Response
The maximum allowed TDSF on this parcel is 8,500 square feet. The approved singlefamily residence is 3,872 square feet. The proposed addition is for 4,620 square feet. The total proposed size of the residence is 8,492 square feet. The proposed size of the residence is within the allowable TDSF limits for the subject lot. This addition was approved by the Planning Commission, and the appeal does not provide legal grounds or evidence supporting an argument for why it cannot be approved at the proposed size Appeal Item 5: Neighborhood Characteristics
Malibu Park is made up of different neighborhoods. The sizes of the homes in this area vary. The size proposed residence is not within the characteristic of the neighborhood.

Structures like this are destroying the rural character of the equestrian neighborhood. The number of parking spaces provided is insufficient, and the number of bedrooms provided will put an excessive strain on the water tank on Busch. The project does not propose replanting native trees and shrubs lost in fire.

Staff Response
The proposed replacement structure complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation. The majority of the development in the surrounding area was destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. Lot sizes and homes in the Malibu Park neighborhood varied in size historically, as noted in the General Plan’s description of the neighborhood. The residences in this are either one- or two-story single-family residences, with either attached or detached garages, accessory structures, swimming pool, etc. The proposed project is for an addition to the residence, an increase in the size of the pool, landscaping, hardscaping, and grading similar to the surrounding houses.

Since the project is over 18 feet in height, it must meet Site Plan Review requirements, including a finding that the project does not adversely affect neighborhood character. The height above 18 feet is consistent with numerous two-story structures in the immediate neighborhood that are of similar or greater height than the proposed development. Staff required the applicant to conduct a more thorough analysis of the neighborhood to see if the entirety of the development would be outside the neighborhood character. The applicant provided a neighborhood character analysis in which they surveyed all properties 9

Agenda Item #1.A.
within a 500-foot radius (Exhibit D). The applicant’s neighborhood character analysis studied the size of parcel, maximum allowed TDSF on the property, and size and height of structures of the proposed development compared to other homes in the neighborhood.

Lot sizes surrounding the subject property ranges from 20,081 square feet – 181,348 square feet. The analysis found that, at least 5 properties have a TDSF proposed in the range of 7,000 square feet – 9,000 square feet, and 9 properties have a TDSF proposed in range of 5,000 square feet – 7,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a TDSF close to the maximum allowed for the property.

A single-family residence requires two enclosed and two unenclosed parking spaces, which is proposed in this project.

The proposed landscape plan was approved in accordance with MMC Chapter 17.53.

Also, Condition 94 in Section 5, of Resolution 24-39 states, ‘Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, Restoration of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area to the satisfaction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be completed and approved. A copy of the approval shall be provided to the Planning Department.’ Appeal Item 6: The project was previously denied.

Staff Response
The current project has not been denied. While a different project proposing an addition was considered previously, no final action was taken on it and the current project differs from that proposal. To provide more detail, CDPWF No. 22-003 was submitted to the Planning Department on February 14, 2022. The project was originally presented to the Planning Commission on February 21, 2023, where the Planning Commission, after conducting the public hearing on the project, directed staff to come back with a resolution denying the project. Before presenting a resolution of denial to the Commission, the applicant submitted a request to withdraw the project. CDPWF No. 22-003 was then withdrawn. A new application, CDPWF No. 23-004, was then submitted for the current project and that is what is before the Council.

Appeal Item 7: The Recitals in the adopted resolution are incorrect and some of the other conditions to be added.

Staff Response
Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 includes recitals that outline the application’s procedural history in chronological order. The recitals are in line with past City resolutions for similar projects and are accurate. Staff has verified that there is no error in the resolution regarding the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission. Section 5 of the Resolution includes Standard Conditions regarding the CDPWF. Conditions from all agencies that reviewed the application, and other conditions related to the project were imposed on the project and have been included. Conditions were also added by the 10

Agenda Item #1.A.

Planning Commission when the project was presented at the hearing. Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 approving the project was adopted by Planning Commission on August 5, 2025 and includes all conditions. The City Council, upon hearing this appeal, can add or remove conditions, if necessary, to make the required findings and proportionate to the impacts of the project.

Appeal Item 8: Lack of fair and Impartial hearing and the decision was made contrary to the law.

The appellant argues that the hearing was neither fair nor lawful because the Commission and the public lacked key information—specifically, the Planning Verification (PV) file— which revealed the true scope and intent of the project. Without this file, the decision unfairly favored the applicant. The appellant claims the owner’s real plan was to build an 8,492-square-foot new residence, not a legitimate fire rebuilds, and that only a portion of this large structure—the kitchen and roof deck—was located within the ESHA buffer, where such development is prohibited. Because the project was misrepresented as a fire rebuild, the Commission unknowingly approved a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) that did not meet two of the four required findings under the Local Coastal Program. The appellant further contends that the project conflicts with Malibu’s General Plan and Mission Statement by introducing urban-scale development into a rural residential area.

Staff Response
The application presented to the Planning Commission was for the addition to the approved structure under PVWF No. 21-034. The plans submitted under this application to the Planning Commission included portions of the residence that were approved under PVWF 21-034 — but these portions of the residence were approved and are no longer subject to challenge.

The staff report presented to the Planning Commission did not include a recommendation.

The Planning Commission, after the project was presented to them by staff, hearing comments from the applicant team and from the members of the public, and after deliberations were able to make required LIP findings. They approved the project on a 3- 2 vote.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Department has analyzed the project. The Planning Commission found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(e), (l) - Existing Facilities, 15303(d), (e) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, 15304(b) - Minor Alterations to Land. The Planning Commission has further determined 11

Agenda Item #1.A.
that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE: Correspondence received for this appeal is included in Exhibit G. Previous correspondence submitted during the Planning Commission hearing on June 6, 2024, and July 15, 2024, are included in Exhibit C.

PUBLIC NOTICE: On January 14, 2026, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City and public notice was mailed to the owners and occupants of all properties within a radius of 500 feet of the subject property (Exhibit F).

SUMMARY: Based on the information in this report, provided with the staff report presented to the Planning Commission, project plans and other documents, the City Council shall provide directions to staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the City Council’s decision.

EXHIBITS:

A. Resolution No. 26-05
B. Appeal No 24-010
C. Planning Commission Agenda Report with Attachments, including adopted Resolution 24-39 and Correspondence
D. Applicant’s Response to Comments for Planning Commission E. Applicant’s Response to Appeal No. 24-010
F. Notice of Public Hearing
G. Correspondence
12 Exhibit A
RESOLUTION NO. 26-05

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, DENYING APPEAL NO. 24-010, DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS

CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT, AND APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT–
WOOLSEY FIRE NO. 23-004, SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 23-026 AND DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 24-020 AN APPLICATION TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4,620 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO A LIKE-FORLIKE REBUILD OF A DESTROYED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE APPROVED UNDER PLANNING VERIFICATION-WOOLSEY FIRE NO. 21- 034, ENLARGEMENTT OF THE EXISTING SWIMMING POOL AND SPA,

RECONFIGURATION OF THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY, HARDSCAPING,

LANDSCAPING, GRADING, IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING TENNIS
COURT; DEMOLITION OF EXITING HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE,

AND INSTALLATION OF A NEW ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT
SYSTEM; INCLUDING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RESIDENCE OVER 18 FEET IN HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 24 FEET IN

HEIGHT FOR A FLAT ROOF LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL, TWO-ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 29738 CUTHBERT ROAD (MALIBO, LLC).

The City Council of the City of Malibu does hereby find, order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On September 28, 2021, Planning Verification-Woolsey Fire (PVWF) No. 21-034 was approved for the in-kind replacement of the single-family residence and swimming pool.

B. On October 26, 2023, an application for Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire (CDPWF) No. 23-004, Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 23-026 and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 24- 020 was submitted to the Planning Department by applicant, Janek Dombrowa, on behalf of the property owner, Malibo LLC. The application was routed to the City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) and Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29) for review.

C. On April 22, 2024, a Notice of Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Application was posted on the subject property.

D. On April 25, 2024, the CDP application was deemed complete for processing.

E. On May 9, 2024, a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

F. On June 3, 2024, the item was continued to July 15, 2024, Regular Planning Commission meeting.

G. On July 15, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the application subject, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written 13 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
reports, public testimony, and other information in the record. Commissioner Peak moved, and Commissioner Smith seconded a motion to direct staff to return with a resolution for approval of Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire No. the subject application including the following conditions of approval: 1) remove tennis court lighting; 2) comply with Dark Sky Ordinance; 3) Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area restoration shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to the satisfaction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; 4) a private party deed restriction shall be recorded to prevent an alcohol, drug or psychiatric recovery or sober living rehabilitation facility from being located on the property in the future; 5) a deed restriction shall be recorded to prevent future use of the property for short-term rentals; and 6) restrict lighting on the rooftop decks to one Dark Sky compliant luminaire per deck. The question was called, and the motion carried 3-2, Chair Mazza and Commissioner Hill dissenting.

H. On August 5, 2024, a resolution approving the subject application was presented to the Planning Commission for adoption.

I. On August 15, 2024, Appeal No. 24-010 was filed by the group of residents.

J. On May 15, 2025, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

K. On June 9, 2025, the item was continued to June 23, 2025, Regular City Council Meeting.

L. On June 23, 2025, the item was continued to date uncertain.

M. On November 13, 2025, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

N. On November 19, 2025, a notification of was sent out that the item was cancelled and the hearing will be re-scheduled at a future date.

O. On January 14, 2025, a Notice of City Council Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

P. On February 18, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application, reviewed and considered the staff report, reviewed and considered written reports, public testimony, and other information in the record.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the City Council has analyzed the proposed project. The City Council found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(e), (l) - Existing Facilities, 15303(d), (e) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, 15304(b) - Minor Alterations to Land. The City Council has further determined that 14 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Appeal of Action.

The appellants contend that the Planning Commission’s decision is based on the findings or conditions not supported by evidence, or the decision is not supported by the findings, lack of a fair or impartial hearing, and the decision was contrary to law. Based on the evidence in the record, as detailed below, in the agenda report, and at the hearing on the matter, the City Council has determined that the project conforms to the Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC), denying the appeals and approving the project. The Council finds that the evidence supports the findings and is consistent with the City’s past application of the applicable provisions of the LIP.

The like-for-like rebuild was approved under application PVWF No. 21-034. The project approved by the Council under this application is for a proposed addition to the replacement structure.

During the Woolsey Fire rebuild process, the City Council allowed, for a limited time, a replacement structure to obtain square footage and site improvements that were greater than the “like-for-like plus 10 percent” allowed under the LIP exemption for structures destroyed in a natural disaster (LIP Section 13.4.6). This project was processed under those regulations in place at the time and was consistent with the Council policies. The time to appeal PVWF No. 21-034, has passed. Property owners who had structures destroyed in the Woolsey Fire were eligible to apply for a PVWF, to rebuild the destroyed structure (under LIP Section 13.4.6). They were also allowed to immediately apply for a second application to make improvements to the “existing” structure (LIP Section 13.4.1) as an extension to the PVWF. The proposed project is an addition to the approved single-family residence under PVWF No. 21-034. The applicant submitted a likefor-like rebuild application (PVWF No. 21-034). Upon approval of this application, they submitted another application, CDPWF No. 23-004, for addition to the approved project. Some portions of the approved residence under PVWF No. 21-034 encroached within 100 feet of the stream but were replaced within the same footprint of the previous structure, which is allowed under LIP Section 13.4.6 and MMC Section 17.60.020. The proposed portions under the subject application are sited 100 feet away from the stream, consistent with LIP Section 4.6.1(A).

The project site is located in the RR-2 residential zone district, an area designated for residential uses. In addition, the subject parcel is not located between the first public road and the sea. The project site is located inland and not located along the shoreline. The applicant considered project alternatives such as relocating the addition elsewhere on the subject parcel or nearer to the stream; however, the relocation would result in greater site disturbance and impacts to environmentally sensitive habitat area (ESHA) than what currently is proposed. The LCP ESHA Overlay map shows a stream diagonally across the parcel’s frontage. However, the proposed additions under this application are located outside the 100-foot ESHA buffer. Additionally, LIP Section 4.4.4(B) exempts Environmental Review Board (ERB) review for additions to structures that do not require additional fuel modification impacts to ESHA, which the proposed additions do not.

The maximum allowed total development square footage (TDSF) on this parcel is 8,500 square feet. The approved single-family residence is 3,872 square feet. The proposed addition is for 4,620 square feet. The total proposed size of the residence is 8,492 square feet. The proposed size of the residence is within the allowable TDSF limits for the subject lot. The applicant’s neighborhood character analysis studied the size of residences, area of the neighboring lots, ratio of proposed 15 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
TDSF with respect to the size of the nearby properties, and height and the look of houses within the neighborhood. Neighboring parcels share similar size, number, and look of buildings. As designed, the proposed project does not have an imposing appearance from any public viewing areas and is within the character of the surrounding neighborhood.

The current project has not been denied. While a different project proposing an addition was brought forward previously, no final action was taken on the application, and the current application differs from that proposal. CDPWF No. 22-003 was submitted to the Planning Department on February 14, 2022. The first application was withdrawn. A new application, CDPWF No. 23-004, was then submitted for the current project and that is what is before the Council, which was approved by the Planning Commission.

The recitals presented in Planning Commission Resolution No. 24-39 state the events pertaining to the application in chronological order. The recitals are in line with past City resolutions for similar projects and are accurate. The staff report presented to the Planning Commission did not have any recommendations. While issues of concern were raised by the appellants, concrete facts are required. The appellants were granted a fair hearing and were provided notice and an opportunity to be heard. The Planning Commission, after the project was presented to them by the staff, hearing comments from the applicant team and from the members of the public, and after deliberations were able to make required LIP findings.

The projects complies with the requirements of the LCP and MMC. Based on the information provided within the agenda reports and this resolution, the City Council has found that the findings or conditions are supported by evidence and that the decision is supported by the findings, that there was a fair or impartial hearing, and that the decision was not contrary to law. Thus, the Council finds to deny the appeals and approve the project.

SECTION 4. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on substantial evidence contained within the record and pursuant to the Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) including Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9, the City Council adopts the analysis in the agenda report, incorporated herein, the findings of fact below, and approves CDPWF No. 23-004 for the construction of a 4,620 square foot addition to a destroyed single-family residence with an attached garage approved under PVWF No. 21-034, extension of the existing swimming pool and spa, driveway reconfiguration, improvements to the existing tennis court, new hardscaping, landscaping, grading, and OWTS; including DP No. 24- 020 for the demolition of an existing hardscape and landscape; and SPR No. 23-026 for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height for a flat roof located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 29738 Cuthbert Road.

The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning, grading, cultural resources, water quality, and wastewater treatment requirements. With the inclusion of the site plan review, the project, as conditioned, has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals, and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)

1. The project is located in the RR-2 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses. The proposed project is for additions to the existing residence approved under the 16 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
Planning Verification and other exterior site improvements. The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, LACFD, City Public Works Department, and WD29 reviewed the project for conformance with the LCP. As discussed herein, based on submitted reports, project plans, visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project, as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all applicable residential development standards inclusive of the site plan review.

2. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the proposed project conforms to the public access and recreational policies in Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act as the subject property offers no direct or indirect public beach access. The proposed development will not interfere or block existing public access to the beach.

3. The proposed project meets the development policies of the LCP and MMC inclusive of the requested SPR and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. The proposed residence has been sited and designed to limit disturbance of the property. The addition to the approved single-family residence is away from the stream.

Therefore, the proposed project has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

B. Site Plan Review Findings for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27)

1. The project has been reviewed for conformance with all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and detailed site investigations, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC inclusive of the site plan review.

2. The proposed replacement structure complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation. The majority of the development in the surrounding area was destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. To date, 11 of the 24 properties within 500 feet of the subject property that that were destroyed are currently taking part in the City’s reconstruction efforts. The other affected properties have not yet submitted applications.

Lot sizes and homes in the Malibu Park neighborhood varied in size historically, as noted in the General Plan’s description of the neighborhood. The adjacent properties on the north side of Cuthbert Road have historically been oriented away from the road to maximize ocean views. Story poles were placed on the subject parcel to demonstrate the project's potential for aesthetic changes to the neighborhood relative to siting, height, and bulk. Staff visited the site to inspect the story poles after installation. As demonstrated by the story poles, the project's location on the site, height and bulk is similar to other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood has historically been residentially developed with single and two-story residences with varied size ranges and similar orientation to maximize views toward the Pacific Ocean. Correspondence from neighbors were received objecting to the size and height of the residence, the outdoor patio, rooftop decks, and outdoor lighting for the tennis court. The applicant has provided analysis of the neighborhood, which shows that there are single-family residences that are similar types of projects within the neighborhood. There are no indications that the project, particularly the portions of the project that are higher than 18 feet, would have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. 17 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

3. There are no significant public views of mountains, canyons, or the ocean over the property from any public viewing areas on or near the property which could be impacted by the applicant’s project. The surrounding neighborhood is similarly developed with residential uses.

Based on staff’s site investigation, photos, review of the architectural plans and the nature of the surrounding area, the project, as proposed and conditioned, will have no significant adverse visual impacts to public views due to project design and location.

4. The proposed project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals, permits and licenses from the City of Malibu and other related agencies.

5. The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that the property is located in an area that has been identified and zoned for residential use and complies with all applicable development standards. The proposed project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan and MMC. The goals and policies of the General Plan intend to maintain rural residential character in this area, and the zoning standards of the MMC implement those goals. All components of the project are consistent with these goals and standards inclusive of the site plan review.

6. The proposed development is infilling residential development that is consistent with characteristics of neighboring properties. The maximum height of the proposed project is 24 feet which may be permitted with the inclusion of a site plan review. A Notice of Application was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius and staff did not receive any comments regarding view obstruction, presumably because surrounding properties have views oriented in a different direction, away from the project. Based on staff's evaluation and site inspections, it was determined that the proposed project will not obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, offshore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys, or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section

17.40.040(A)(17).

C. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)

1. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability of the site from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

2. The project, as designed, conditioned, and approved by the geotechnical consulting reviewers and the City Public Works Department, does not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or fire hazards due to the project design.

3. The project, as conditioned, is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, and LACFD. These specialists and agency determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity. There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would result in less site disturbance.

5. The proposed project, as designed and conditioned, will not have adverse impacts 18 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
on sensitive resources.

D. Demolition Permit (MMC Chapter 17.70)

1. Conditions of approval included for this application ensure that the project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts.

2. The application is approved pursuant to MMC Section 17.70.030(B), which allows the concurrent processing of a demolition permit if all the other discretionary applications necessary for the proposed construction on the site are approved.

SECTION 5. City Council Action.

Based on the foregoing findings and evidence contained within the record, the City Council hereby approves CDPWF No. 23-004, SPR No. 23-026 and DP No. 24-020, subject to the following conditions, that are applicable to the project, as noted below.

SECTION 6. Conditions of Approval.

1. The property owners, and their successors in interest, shall indemnify and defend the City of Malibu and its officers, employees and agents from and against all liability and costs relating to the City's actions concerning this project, including (without limitation) any award of litigation expenses in favor of any person or entity who seeks to challenge the validity of any of the City's actions or decisions in connection with this project. The City shall have the sole right to choose its counsel and property owners shall reimburse the City’s expenses incurred in its defense of any lawsuit challenging the City’s actions concerning this project.

2. Approval of this application is to allow for the following:
a. 4,620 square foot additions to the previously approved residence; i. Total development square footage (TDSF) is 8,492-square feet. b. Expansion of the swimming pool and spa;
c. Associated pool equipment (to be fully screened);
d. Re-configuration of the existing driveway;
e. Resurfacing existing tennis court;
f. New 1,085 square foot outdoor seating area with trellis (less than 18 feet in height) for tennis court;
g. New 132 square foot accessory structure;
h. New 3,060 square foot permeable outdoor garden;
i. New hardscape;
j. 10,134 square feet of new landscape;
k. New view permeable vehicular gate (up-to six feet in height); l. New fence (up-to six feet in height);
m. New OWTS.

Discretionary Requests:
n. SPR No. 23-026 to allow for construction of the addition up to 24 feet in height for a flat roof; and
19 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
o. DP No. 24-020 for the demolition of existing hardscape and landscape.

3. Except as specifically changed by conditions of approval, the proposed development shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the approved scope of work, as described in Condition No. 2 and depicted on plans on file with the Planning Department date stamped May 23, 2024. The proposed development shall further comply with all conditions of approval stipulated in this resolution and Department Review Sheets attached hereto. In the event project plans conflict with any condition of approval, the condition shall take precedence.

4. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.18.2, this permit and rights conferred in this approval shall not be effective until the property owner signs, notarizes and returns the Acceptance of Conditions Affidavit accepting the conditions of approval set forth herein. The applicant shall file this form with the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any development permits.

5. The applicant shall digitally submit a complete set of plans to the Planning Department for consistency review and approval prior to plan check and again prior to the issuance of any building or development permits.

6. The CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three (3) years after issuance of the permit, unless a time extension has been granted. Extension of the permit may be granted by the approving authority for due cause. Extensions shall be requested in writing by the applicant or authorized agent prior to expiration of the three-year period and shall set forth the reasons for the request. In the event of an appeal, the CDP shall expire if the project has not commenced within three years from the date the appeal is decided by the decision-making body or withdrawn by the appellant.

7. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition of approval will be resolved by the Planning Director upon written request of such interpretation.

8. All development shall conform to requirements of the City of Malibu Environmental Sustainability Department, City Biologist, City Coastal Engineer, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, City Public Works Department, WD29 and LACFD, as applicable. Notwithstanding this review, all required permits shall be secured.

9. Minor changes to the approved plans or the conditions of approval may be approved by the Planning Director, provided such changes achieve substantially the same results and the project is still in compliance with the Malibu Municipal Code and the Local Coastal Program. Revised plans reflecting the minor changes and additional fees shall be required.

10. Pursuant to LIP Section 13.20, development pursuant to an approved CDP shall not commence until the CDP is effective. The CDP is not effective until all appeals, including those to the California Coastal Commission (CCC), have been exhausted. In the event that the CCC denies the permit or issues the permit on appeal, the coastal development permit approved by the City is void.
20 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

11. The applicant must submit payment for any outstanding fees payable to the City prior to issuance of any building permit, including grading or demolition.

Cultural Resources

12. In the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources and until the Planning Director can review this information. Thereafter, the procedures contained in LIP Chapter 11 and those in MMC Section 17.54.040(D)(4)(b) shall be followed.

13. If human bone is discovered during geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease, and the procedures described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code shall be followed. Section 7050.5 requires notification of the coroner. If the coroner determines that the remains are those of a Native American, the applicant shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission by phone within 24 hours. Following notification of the Native American Heritage Commission, the procedures described in Section 5097.94 and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code shall be followed.

Lighting

14. Exterior lighting must comply with the Dark Sky Ordinance and shall be minimized, shielded, or concealed and restricted to low intensity features, so that no light source is directly visible from public view. Permitted lighting shall conform to the following standards:
a. Lighting for walkways shall be limited to fixtures that do not exceed two feet in height and are directed downward, and limited to 850 lumens (equivalent to a 60- watt incandescent bulb);
b. Security lighting controlled by motion detectors may be attached to the residence provided it is directed downward and is limited to 850 lumens; c. Driveway lighting shall be limited to the minimum lighting necessary for safe vehicular use. The lighting shall be limited to 850 lumens; d. Lights at entrances as required by the Building Code shall be permitted provided that such lighting does not exceed 850 lumens;
e. Site perimeter lighting shall be prohibited; and
f. Outdoor decorative lighting for aesthetic purposes is prohibited.

15. Night lighting for sports courts or other private recreational facilities shall be prohibited.

16. No permanently installed lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Lighting levels on any nearby property from artificial light sources on the subject property(ies) shall not produce an illumination level greater than one-foot candle.

17. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded directed downward and inward so there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. High intensity lighting of the shore is prohibited. 21 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

18. String lights are allowed in occupied dining and entertainment areas only and must not exceed 3,000 Kelvin.

19. Motion sensor lights shall be programmed to extinguish ten minutes after activation.

20. Three violations of the conditions by the same property owner will result in a requirement to permanently remove the outdoor light fixture(s) from the site.

Fencing and Walls

21. The height of fences and walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A). No retaining wall shall exceed six feet in height or 12 feet in height for a combination of two or more walls.

Demolition/Solid Waste

22. Prior to demolition activities, the applicant shall receive Planning Department approval for compliance with conditions of approval.

23. The applicant/property owner shall contract with a City approved hauler to facilitate the recycling of all recoverable/recyclable material. Recoverable material shall include but shall not be limited to asphalt, dirt and earthen material, lumber, concrete, glass, metals, and drywall.

24. Prior to the issuance of a building/demolition permit, an Affidavit and Certification to implement waste reduction and recycling shall be signed by the Owner or Contractor and submitted to the Environmental Sustainability Department. The Affidavit shall indicate the agreement of the applicant to divert at least 65 percent (in accordance with CalGreen) of all construction waste from the landfill.

25. Upon plan check approval of demolition plans, the applicant shall secure a demolition permit from the City. The applicant shall comply with all conditions related to demolition imposed by the Building Official.

26. No demolition permit shall be issued until building permits are approved for issuance.

Demolition of the existing structure and initiation of reconstruction must take place within a six-month period. Dust control measures must be in place if construction does not commence within 30 days.

27. The project developer shall utilize licensed subcontractors and ensure that all asbestoscontaining materials and lead-based paints encountered during demolition activities are removed, transported, and disposed of in full compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations.

28. Any building or demolition permits issued for work commenced or completed without the benefit of required permits are subject to appropriate “Investigation Fees” as required in the Building Code.

29. Upon completion of demolition activities, the applicant shall request a final inspection by the Building Safety Division.
22 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
Construction / Framing

30. Prior to the commencement of work, the applicant shall submit a copy of their Construction Management Plan. The Construction Management Plan shall include a dedicated parking location for construction workers, not within the public right of way.

31. A construction staging plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to plan check submittal.

32. Construction hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. No construction activities shall be permitted on Sundays or City-designated holidays.

33. Construction management techniques, including minimizing the amount of equipment used simultaneously and increasing the distance between emission sources, shall be employed as feasible and appropriate. All trucks leaving the construction site shall adhere to the California Vehicle Code. In addition, construction vehicles shall be covered when necessary; and their tires rinsed prior to leaving the property.

Biology/Landscaping

34. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain a plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

35. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with MMC Chapter 17.53. The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Chapter 17.53.

36. Prior to a final plan check approval, the property owner /applicant must provide a landscape water use approval from the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29.

37. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition serving the same function as a fence or wall (also known as a hedge) located within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of six feet. A hedge located within the front yard setback shall be maintained at or below a height of 42 inches. Three violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.

38. Construction fencing shall be placed within five feet of the southern limits of grading.

Construction fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of any construction and shall be maintained throughout the construction period to protect the site’s sensitive habitat areas.

39. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

40. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited. 23 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

41. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to significantly obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

42. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.

43. Except as permitted pursuant to the provisions in LUP policies 3.18 and 3.20, throughout the City of Malibu, development that involves the use of pesticides, including insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides, or any other similar toxic chemical substances, shall be prohibited in cases where the application of such substances would have the potential to significantly degrade Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas or coastal water quality or harm wildlife.

Herbicides may be used for the eradication of invasive plant species or habitat restoration, but only if the use of non-chemical methods for prevention and management such as physical, mechanical, cultural, and biological controls are infeasible. Herbicides shall be restricted to the least toxic product and method, and to the maximum extent feasible, shall be biodegradable, derived from natural sources, and used for a limited time.

44. The use of wood chips and shredded rubber is prohibited anywhere on the site. Flammable mulch material, including shredded bark, pine needles, and artificial turf, are prohibited between zero and five feet of a structure. Non-continuous use of flammable mulch (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) is allowed between 5 and 30 feet from the eave/overhang of a structure with limited application areas. Any mulch materials (excluding wood chips and shredded rubber) are allowed 30 feet or more from a structure with no limitation on application area.

45. Any site preparation activities, including removal of vegetation, between February 1 and September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist at least five days prior to initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of nesting bird surveys shall be submitted to the City within two business days of completing the surveys.

46. Grading and/or demolition shall be scheduled only during the dry season from April 1 – October 31. If it becomes necessary to conduct grading activities from November 1 – March 31, a comprehensive erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and implemented prior to initiation of vegetation removal and/or grading activities.

47. No planting or landscaping is permitted within the banks of the mapped blue line stream.

The area between the banks lies within the jurisdiction of California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the bottom of the drainage is in the jurisdiction of US Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board. Any proposed changes in the drainage would require permits from each of the associated agencies.

48. Prior to issuing A Certificate of Occupancy, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all planning conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
24 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
Geology

49. All recommendations of the consulting certified engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer and/or the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be incorporated into all final design and construction including foundations, grading, sewage disposal, and drainage. Final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

50. Final plans approved by the City geotechnical consultant reviewers shall be in substantial conformance with the approved CDP relative to construction, grading, sewage disposal and drainage. Any substantial changes may require a CDP amendment or a new CDP.

Environmental Health

51. Final OWTS Plot Plan: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a final OWTS plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP, including necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS plot plan shall show essential features of the OWTS and must fit onto an 11-inch by 17-inch sheet leaving a five-inch margin clear to provide space for a City applied legend. If the scale of the plans is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details and/or all necessary setbacks, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inches by 22 inches).

52. Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: If the OWTS design and/or bedroom/drainage fixture unit counts are modified in any way subsequent to the Planningstage review, then a final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components (i.e., alarm system, pumps, timers, flow equalization devices, backflow devices, etc.) proposed for use in the construction of the proposed OWTS. For all OWTS, final reports must be signed by a City registered OWTS Designer, and the plans stamped by a California Geologist. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator with the designer’s wet signature, professional registration number and stamp (if applicable).

53. The final design report shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems.

The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day, and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture equivalents, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design; b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, 25 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
textile filter ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for "package" systems; and conceptual design for custom engineered systems;
d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day and gallons per square foot per day. Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gallons per day). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units and building occupancy characteristics; and
e. All final design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the scale of the plan is such that more space is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18 inch by 22 inch, for review by Environmental Health). Note:

For OWTS final designs, full-size plans are required for review by the Building Safety Division and/or the Planning Department.

54. Existing OWTS to be Abandoned: Final plans shall clearly show the locations of all existing OWTS components (serving pre-existing development) to be abandoned and provide procedures for the OWTS’ proper abandonment in conformance with the MMC.

55. Worker Safety Note and Abandonment of Existing OWTS: The following note shall be added to the plan drawings included with the OWTS final design: “Prior to commencing work to abandon, remove, or replace the existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) components, an ‘OWTS Abandonment Permit’ shall be obtained from the City of Malibu. All work performed in the OWTS abandonment, removal or replacement area shall be performed in strict accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental and occupational safety and health regulatory requirements. The obtainment of any such required permits or approvals for this scope of work shall be the responsibility of the applicant and their agents.”

56. Reference Plans: Reference architectural and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted to Environmental Health during building plan check review of the proposed OWTS.

Approvable building plans will show a single-family residence with no more than 8 bedrooms and 122 drainage fixture units, and a new tennis pavilion 0 bedrooms and 9 drainage fixture units.

57. Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted to the City Environmental Health Administrator.
26 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

58. Operations and Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed OWTS.

59. Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of the subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed onsite wastewater disposal system after construction shall be submitted. Note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable.

60. Advanced OWTS Covenant: Prior to final Environmental Health approval, a covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the onsite wastewater treatment system serving subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of MMC. Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator.

61. Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

62. City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

63. City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu geotechnical staff final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.

64. City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.

65. Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of the final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specification.

66. Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with MMC, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an OWTS operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application.

Grading/Drainage/Hydrology

67. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading or building permit, The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the proposed work within the City’s right-of-way. For projects on Dume Drive, Grayfox Street, Fernhill Drive and Wildlife Road the City received a Safe Routes to School Grant for improving pedestrian safety. Any proposed street improvements along these streets shall consider the potential impact on the existing conditions, such as but not limited to decomposed granite and wood ties.
27 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________

68. The applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department prior to the commencement of any work within the public right-of-way. The driveway shall be constructed of either six inches of concrete over four inches of aggregate base, or four inches of asphalt concrete over six inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

69. The non-exempt grading for the project shall not exceed a total of 1,000 cubic yards, cut and fill.

70. The total grading yardage verification certificate shall be copied onto the coversheet of the Grading Plan. No alternative formats or substitutes will be accepted.

71. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMPs shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, postconstruction BMPs and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

72. The ocean between Latigo Point and the west City limits has been established by the State Water Resources Control Board as an Area of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) as part of the California Ocean Plan. This designation prohibits the discharge of any waste, including stormwater runoff, directly into the ASBS. The applicant shall provide a drainage system that accomplishes the following:
a. Installation of BMPs that are designed to treat the potential pollutants in the stormwater runoff so that it does not alter the natural ocean water quality. These pollutants include trash, oil and grease, metals, bacteria, nutrients, pesticides, herbicides and sediment.
b. Prohibits the discharge of trash.
c. Only discharges from existing storm drain outfalls are allowed. No new outfalls will be allowed. Any proposed or new storm water discharged shall be routed to existing storm drain outfalls and shall not result in any new contribution of waste to the ASBS (i.e., no additional pollutant loading).
d. Elimination of non-storm water discharges.

73. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval of the Public Works Director. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage on the site. The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
a. Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs):
b. Source Control BMPs;
c. Treatment Control BMPs that retain on-site Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technically infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site; d. Drainage improvements;
e. A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMPs for the expected life of the structure;
28 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
f. Methods of onsite percolation, site re-vegetation and an analysis for off-site project impacts;
g. Measures to treat and infiltrate runoff from impervious areas; h. A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measure installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits; and
i. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department and the fee applicable at the time of submittal for review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and/or building plans. The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMPs, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder. A certified copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

74. A grading and drainage plan containing the following information shall be approved, and submitted to the Public Works Department, prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project:
a. Public Works Department general notes;
b. The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks); c. The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated and a total area shall be shown on this plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated;
d. If the property contains trees that are to be protected they shall be highlighted on the grading plan;
e. If the property contains rare, endangered, or special status species as identified in the Biological Assessment, this plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on this plan as required by the City Biologist; f. The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses and over excavations for fill slopes;
g. Private storm drain systems shall be shown on this plan. Systems greater than 12 inches in diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with this plan; and
h. Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

75. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (LSWPPP) shall be provided prior to issuance of grading/building permits. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but is not limited to:
29 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
Erosion Controls Scheduling Erosion Controls Scheduling Preservation of Existing Vegetation
Sediment Controls
Silt Fence
Sandbag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Management Water Conservation Practices Dewatering Operations
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste Management
All Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be in accordance with the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

76. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development. The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A). The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.

77. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development that:
a. Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
b. Includes grading on slopes greater than 4 to 1.
c. Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4 to 1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources.

78. The developer’s consulting engineer shall sign the final plans prior to the issuance of permits.

Fuel Modification

79. Prior to the issuance of final building permits, the project shall receive LACFD approval of a Final Fuel Modification Plan.
30 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
Screening

80. Any above-ground equipment shall be screened from view by a solid wall or fence on all four sides. The fence or walls shall comply with LIP Section 3.5.3(A).

Swimming Pool / Spa / Mechanical Equipment

81. Onsite noise, including that which emanates from swimming pool and air conditioning equipment, shall be limited as described in MMC Chapter 8.24 (Noise).

82. All swimming pools shall contain double walled construction with drains and leak detection systems capable of sensing a leak of the inner wall.

83. The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, algaecides, or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
a. The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
b. There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and c. The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries)

84. Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.

85. A sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa, or water feature waters to a street, drainage course, or storm drain per MMC Section 13.04.060(D)(5)” shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.

86. Pursuant to MMC Section 9.20.040(B), all ponds, decorative fountains shall require a water recirculating/recycling system.

Water Service

87. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit an updated Will Serve Letter from WD29 indicating the ability of the property to receive adequate water service.

Deed Restrictions

88. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting lighting requirements set forth in Condition Nos. 14-20.

The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.

89. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a private party deed restriction to prevent an alcohol, drug or psychiatric recovery or sober living rehabilitation facility from being located on the property in the future. The 31 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final Planning Department approval.

90. Prior to final Planning Department approval, the applicant shall be required to execute and record a deed restriction reflecting that property shall not be rented, leased or otherwise made available for occupancy for a duration of less than 30 days at any time (referred to as ‘short term rental’). The property owner shall provide a copy of the recorded document to the Planning Department prior to final planning Department approval.

Site Specific Conditions

91. No furniture or other attachment, whether temporary or fixed, may be placed on the roof top deck overnight.

92. All rooftop deck lighting must be limited to a single light fixture that meets Dark Sky compliant standards. This fixture must direct light downward and minimize light pollution, ensuring it does not contribute to skyglow or disrupt natural nighttime environments.

93. The tennis court lights, lights fixture, and light poles shall be removed prior to final planning inspection.

94. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, Restoration of Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area to the satisfaction of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife shall be completed and approval. A copy of the approval shall be provided to Planning Department.

Prior to Occupancy

95. Prior to a final Building inspection, the applicant shall provide a Recycling Summary Report (Summary Report) and obtain the approval from the Environmental Sustainability Department.

Applicant must provide haul tickets and diversion information. The final Summary Report shall designate the specific materials that were land filled or recycled and state the facilities where all materials were taken.

96. The applicant shall request a final Planning Department inspection prior to final inspection by the City of Malibu Building Safety Division. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until the Planning Department has determined that the project complies with this CDP.

97. Any construction trailer, storage equipment or similar temporary equipment not permitted as part of the approved scope of work shall be removed prior to final inspection and approval, and if applicable, the issuance of the certificate of occupancy.

Fixed Conditions

98. This coastal development permit shall run with the land and bind all future owners of the property.

99. Violation of any of the conditions of this approval may be cause for revocation of this permit and termination of all rights granted there under. 32 Resolution No. 26-05

______________________
SECTION 7. The City Council shall certify the adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of February 2026. __________________________________________
MARIANNE RIGGINS, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
KELSEY PETTIJOHN, City Clerk
(seal)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
TREVOR RUSIN, Interim City Attorney
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 1.12.010 of the MMC and Code of Civil Procedure. Any person wishing to challenge the above action in Superior Court may be limited to raising only those issues they or someone else raised at the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Malibu at or prior to the public hearing. 33 34
Exhibit B
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66

Commission Agenda Report
To: Chair Mazza and Members of the Planning Commission
Prepared by: Aakash Shah, Contract Planner
Approved by: Richard Mollica, Planning Director
Date prepared: June 27, 2024 Meeting date: July 15, 2024 Subject: Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire No. 23-004, Site Plan Review No. 23-026 and Demolition Permit No. 24-020 – An application to allow for the construction of a 4,620 square-foot addition to a destroyed single-family residence approved under Planning Verification-Woolsey Fire No. 21-034, extension of the existing swimming pool and spa, reconfiguration of the existing driveway, hardscape, landscape, grading, improvements to the existing tennis court; demolition of existing hardscape and landscape, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system; including a site plan review for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height (Continued from June 3, 2024)
Location: 29738 Cuthbert Road, partially within the appealable coastal zone
APN: 4469-041-011
Owner: Malibo, LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Consider Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire (CDPWF) No. 23-004 for the construction of a 4,620 square foot addition to a destroyed single-family residence with an attached garage approved under Planning VerificationWoolsey Fire (PVWF) No. 21-034, extension of the existing swimming pool and spa, driveway reconfiguration, improvements to existing tennis court, new hardscaping, landscaping, grading, and onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS); including Demolition Permit (DP) No. 24-020 for the demolition of existing hardscape and landscape; and Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 23-026 for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height for a flat roof located in the Rural Residential, Two-Acre (RR-2) zoning district at 29738 Cuthbert Road and provide Planning Commission
Meeting
07-15-24
Item

4.A.

Exhibit C
67

direction to staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the Planning Commission’s decision (Malibo, LLC).

DISCUSSION: This agenda report provides a project overview, a summary of the surrounding land uses and project setting, description of the proposed project, staff’s analysis of the proposed project’s consistency with Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) provisions, and environmental review pursuant to CEQA. The Planning Commission can determine if the analysis contained herein demonstrates the project is consistent with the LCP and MMC inclusive of the SPR.

Project Overview
The subject parcel is partially located within the Appeal Jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission (CCC) as depicted on the Post-Local Coastal Program Certification Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Map of the City of Malibu and therefore, the subject application requires a CDP.

The previously existing single-family residence, detached garage, guest house, shed, stable/storage room, and pool house were destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. On September 28, 2020, the Planning Department approved PVWF No. 21-034 for a like-forlike rebuild of the single-family residence and swimming pool. PVWF No. 21-034 approved 3,872 square feet of the structure to be rebuilt. A portion of the approved single-family residence under the PVWF application encroaches into the 100-foot buffer from an LCPmapped stream. The replacement structure met the CDP exemption criteria contained in LCP Local Implementation Plan (LIP) Chapter 13.4.6.

The proposed additions to the previously approved residence are sited outside the 100- foot buffer from the stream. Also, the proposed additions do not expand the required fuel modification established by the previously approved residence (Attachment 3). The proposed additions will neither encroach into Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) or ESHA buffer and therefore, are not subject to ESHA provisions. Additionally, LIP Section 4.4.4(B) exempts Environmental Review Board (ERB) review for additions to existing structures that do not require additional fuel modification. Therefore, ERB review was not required.

Proposed Project: The proposed project includes a 4,620 square foot addition to the previously approved residence. Exterior site improvements include 16,932 square feet of total impermeable coverage, expanding the existing swimming pool and spa, view permeable front yard fencing and gate (not to exceed six feet in height), outdoor seating area for the tennis court, new landscaping, hardscaping and OWTS. The proposed additions to the previously approved residence are designed to utilize the previously existing development footprint, driveway alignment, and remaining site improvements, as shown in the project plans (Attachment 1).
68

The proposed addition could be relocated elsewhere on the subject parcel or nearer to the stream; however, the relocation would result in greater site disturbance. Most of the proposed development is within previously disturbed areas of the parcel. Additionally, it would result in a need to create a new fire access, expand the building pad, and pool development area. This is not the least environmentally damaging alternative.

The proposed replacement structure complies with the size, height, location, grading and residential development standards of the LCP and MMC, consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation. The majority of the development in the surrounding area was destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. To date, 18 of the 23 properties within 500 feet of the subject property that were destroyed are currently taking part in the City’s reconstruction efforts.

The other affected properties have not submitted applications. Some of the existing residences (properties not affected by Woolsey Fire), and approved fire rebuild singlefamily residences on Cuthbert and Harvester Road exceed a height of 18 feet.

Lot sizes and homes in the Malibu Park neighborhood varied in size historically, as noted in the General Plan’s description of the neighborhood. The adjacent properties on the north side of Cuthbert Road have historically been oriented away from the road to maximize ocean views. Story poles were placed on the subject parcel to demonstrate the project's potential for aesthetic changes to the neighborhood relative to siting, height, and bulk. Staff visited the site to inspect the story poles after installation. As demonstrated by the story poles, the project's location on the site, height and bulk is similar to other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood has historically been residentially developed with single- and two-story residences with varied size ranges and similar orientation to maximize views toward the Pacific Ocean.

A correspondence (Attachment 5) from a neighbor was received objecting to the size and height of the residence, the outdoor patio, rooftop decks, and outdoor lighting for the tennis court. There are residences in the neighborhood, with similar size, height and other site improvements that were not destroyed in fire and approved fire rebuild single family residences in the neighborhood. A smaller project could be proposed on the project site; however, the project complies with the maximum allowable TDSF, impermeable coverage, setbacks, grading and height requirements inclusive of the SPR. The development does not disturb any public or private protected views. As such, it is not anticipated that a smaller or relocated project would be a substantially environmentally superior alternative. There are no indications that the project, particularly the portions of the project that are higher than 18 feet, would have an adverse effect on neighborhood character. A condition of approval will be added shall the Commission choose to approve the project that the outdoor lighting should be brought into conformance per MMC chapter 17.41. 69

Surrounding Land Uses and Project Setting
As shown in Figure 1, the subject property is rectangular in shape. The lot is 2.03 acres and is zoned RR-2 (Figure 1 – Aerial Photo). The proposed site of development is generally flat.

The subject property cannot be seen from public scenic areas, including Pacific Coast Highway, beaches, and parks. The planned Zuma Ridge Trail is located approximately 30 feet north of the project site according to the LCP Parklands Map. That trail is currently unimproved and therefore unused. The proposed additions are not anticipated to significantly impact public views of the Santa Monica Mountains or Pacific Ocean as the proposed project will blend in with surrounding development.

The project site is partially within the appealable jurisdiction of the CCC, as depicted on the Post-LCP Certification Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Map. The LCP ESHA Overlay map shows a stream crossing the property diagonally along the parcel’s frontage.

Figure 1 – Aerial Photograph
Source: City of Malibu GIS 2024
Table 1 below depicts the surrounding properties. As shown, the subject parcel is surrounded by single-family residences with RR-2 zoning similar to the subject parcel. 70

Table 2 provides a summary of the lot dimensions and lot area of the subject parcel.

Table 2 – Total Property Data
Lot Depth 471 feet
Lot Width 189 feet
Gross Lot Area 88,656 square feet
Net Lot Area* 88,406 square feet
*Net Lot Area = Gross Lot Area minus the area of access easements and 1 to 1 slopes.

Project Description
The proposed scope of work is as follows:
a. 4,620 square foot additions to the previously approved residence; i. Total development square footage (TDSF) is 8,492-square feet. b. Expansion of the swimming pool and spa;
c. Associated pool equipment (to be fully screened);
d. Re-configuration of the existing driveway;
e. Resurfacing existing tennis court;
f. New 1,085 square foot outdoor seating area with trellis (less than 18 feet in height) for tennis court;
g. New 132 square foot accessory structure;
h. New 3,060 square foot permeable outdoor garden;
i. New hardscape;
j. 10,134 square feet of new landscape;
k. New view permeable vehicular gate (up-to six feet in height); l. New fence (up-to six feet in height);
m. New OWTS.

Discretionary Requests:
n. SPR No. 23-026 to allow for construction of the addition over 18 feet not to exceed 24 feet in height for a flat roof; and
o. DP No. 24-020 for the demolition of existing hardscape and landscape.

Table 1 – Surrounding Land Uses
Direction Address Lot Size Zoning Land Use
North 29737 Cuthbert Road 0.5 Acre RR-2 Single-Family Residence South 29725 Harvester Road 1.3 Acres RR-2 Single-Family Residence 29735 Harvester Road 1.3 Acres RR-2 Single-Family Residence West 29756 Cuthbert Road 2.4 Acres RR-2 Vacant Parcel
East 29718 Cuthbert Road 1.5 Acres RR-2 Single-Family Residence 71

LCP Analysis
The LCP consists of a Land Use Plan (LUP) and LIP. The LUP contains programs and policies to implement the Coastal Act in the City of Malibu. The purpose of the LIP is to carry out the policies of the LUP. The LIP contains specific policies and regulations to which every project requiring a coastal development permit must adhere.

There are 14 sections within the LIP that potentially require specified findings to be made, depending on the nature and location of the proposed project. Of these 14, five sections are for conformance review only and require no findings. These five sections include Zoning, Grading and Archaeological / Cultural Resources, Water Quality, and Wastewater Treatment System Standards and are discussed under the Conformance Analysis section.

The nine remaining LIP sections include: 1) Coastal Development Permit findings; 2) ESHA; 3) Native Tree Protection; 4) Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection; 5) Transfer of Development Credits; 6) Hazards; 7) Shoreline and Bluff Development; 8) Public Access; and 9) Land Division. For the reasons described in this report, including the project site, the scope of work, and evidence in the record, only findings in the following chapters are applicable to the proposed project: Coastal Development Permit, and Hazards.1 These chapters require findings that will need to be made shall the Commission decide to approve the project.

Additionally, six findings will need to be made for the approval of the proposed SPR, and two findings will need to be made for the approval of the demolition.

LIP Conformance Analysis
The proposed project was reviewed by the Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, the Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), and Los Angeles County Water Works District 29 (Attachment 2 – Department Review Sheets). These specialists found the project, as proposed and conditioned, to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes, standards, goals and policies inclusive of the site plan review.

Zoning (LIP Chapter 3)
The proposed project is subject to development and design standards set forth under LIP Sections 3.5 and 3.6. Table 3 provides a summary and indicates the proposed project meets those standards.

Table 3 – LCP Non-Beachfront Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/Required Proposed Comments SETBACKS (Additions)
1 The ESHA, Native Tree Protection, Transfer of Development Credits, Shoreline and Bluff Development, Public Access, and Land Division findings are neither applicable nor required for the proposed project. 72

Table 3 – LCP Non-Beachfront Zoning Conformance
Development Requirement Allowed/Required Proposed Comments Front Yard 65 feet 181 feet, 8 inches Complies
Rear Yard 70 feet, 7 inches 202 feet, 3 inches Complies East Side Yard 23 feet, 6 inches 24 feet, 4 inches Complies West Side Yard 23 feet, 6 inches 118 feet, 2 inches Complies

PARKING
Enclosed 2 2 Complies
Unenclosed
2 2 Complies
TDSF 8,500 square feet 8,492 square feet Complies
2/3rds Calculation 5,780 sq. ft. x 2/3 =
3,853 sq. ft.
3,715 square feet Complies
IMPERMEABLE COVERAGE 25,000 square feet 16,392 square feet Complies HEIGHT (SFR) 18 feet 24 feet (flat roof) Site Plan
Review No.
23-026
NON-EXEMPT GRADING 1,000 cu. yd. 543 cu. yd. Complies

FENCES/WALLS/HEDGES/GATES
Front Yard 6 ft.; lower 42 in.
view impermeable
6 ft.; lower 42 in.
view impermeable Complies
Rear Yard 6 ft. 6 ft. Complies
Side Yards 6 ft. 6 ft. Complies
Retaining Walls 6 ft. None proposed N/A
As shown in Table 3 above, the proposed project conforms to the development standards as set forth under LIP Chapter 3.

Grading (LIP Chapter 8)
Table 4 – LCP Grading Conformance
Exempt* NonExempt Remedial Total R&R** Understructure Safety*** Cut 1,500 232 44 88 0 1,864
Fill 1,500 161 245 455 0 2,361
Total 3,000 393 289 543 0 4,225
Import 0 0 201 367 0 568
Export 0 71 0 0 0 71
All quantities listed in cubic yards unless otherwise noted. *R&R= Removal and Re-compaction.
**Exempt grading includes all R&R, understructure, and safety grading. ***Safety grading is the incremental grading required for Fire Department access (such as turnouts, hammerheads, and turnarounds, and any other increases in driveway width above 15 feet required by the LACFD).

The total amount of non-exempt grading conforms to the grading requirements as set forth under LIP Section 8.3, which ensures that new development minimizes the visual and 73

resource impacts of grading and landform alteration by restricting the amount of nonexempt grading to a maximum of 1,000 cubic yards for a residential parcel.

Archaeological / Cultural Resources (LIP Chapter 11)
LIP Chapter 11 requires certain procedures to be followed to determine potential impacts on archaeological resources. The proposed development is proposed on a previously disturbed pad. According to archaeological reports available for surrounding properties, there appears to be a very low probability for cultural resources to exist on the subject property. As a result, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on cultural resources. Accordingly, staff determined that no further study is required at this time and any proposed improvements within the project area will have no adverse impact on known cultural resources.

Nevertheless, a condition of approval would be included in the resolution which would state that in the event that potentially important cultural resources are found in the course of geologic testing or during construction, work shall immediately cease until a qualified archaeologist can provide an evaluation of the nature and significance of the resources, and until the Planning Director can review this information.

Water Quality (LIP Chapter 17)
The City Public Works Department reviewed and approved the proposed project for conformance to LIP Chapter 17 requirements for water quality protection. A standard condition of approval for this project requires that prior to the issuance of any development permit, a Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan incorporating construction-phase Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and Best Management Practices must be approved by the City Public Works Department. With the implementation of these conditions, the proposed project conforms to the water quality protection standards of LIP Chapter 17.

Wastewater Treatment System Standards (LIP Chapter 18)
LIP Chapter 18 addresses OWTS. LIP Section 18.7 includes specific siting, design, and performance requirements. The proposed project allows for a new 1,500-gallon tank with effluent filter for the tennis court restroom and a new 5,000-gallon tank with effluent filter for the single-family residence, three new leach trenches measuring three feet in width by 80 feet in length and three designated future leach trenches. Details are provided in the Environmental Health Review Sheet and approved plot plan in Attachment 2. The system has been reviewed by the City Environmental Health Administrator and found to meet the minimum requirements of the MMC and the LCP.
74

LIP Findings
Based on the scope of work proposed in this amendment, the following LIP Chapters apply: General Coastal Development Permit findings (Chapter 13), and Hazards (Chapter 9). Additionally, six findings will need to be made for the approval of the SPR (LIP Section

13.27), and two findings will need to be made for the approval of the demolition (MMC Chapter 17.70)
These chapters require findings that will need to be made should the Commission decide to approve the project. A summary of the findings is provided below.

A. Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter 13)
LIP Section 13.9 requires that the following four findings be made for all coastal development permits. As discussed in this report the project is located in the RR-2 residential zoning district, an area designated for residential uses. In addition, the subject parcel is not located between the first public road and the sea. The project site is located inland and not located along the shoreline. The proposed project is for additions to the existing residence approved under the Planning Verification and other exterior site improvements. The Planning Department, City Biologist, City Environmental Health Administrator, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, LACFD, City Public Works Department, and WD29 reviewed the project for conformance with the LCP.

The applicant considered project alternative such as relocating the addition elsewhere on the subject parcel or nearer to the stream; however, the relocation would result in greater site disturbance. As proposed the development is within previously disturbed areas of the parcel. Additionally, modification of the existing development area would result in a need to create a new fire access, expand the building pad, and pool development area.

The LCP ESHA Overlay map shows a stream diagonally across the parcel’s frontage.

However, the proposed development is located outside the 100-foot ESHA buffer and the additions will not expand the required fuel modification. Additionally, LIP Section 4.4.4(B) exempts Environmental Review Board (ERB) review for additions to existing structures that do not require additional fuel modification.

B. Site Plan Review Request from LIP Section 3.6(E) – Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height [LIP Section 13.27]
Pursuant to LIP Section 13.27.1, a site plan review is required to allow for construction to be over 18 feet in height, up to a maximum height of 24 feet for a flat roof (the proposed addition is 24 feet). LIP Section 13.27.5(A) requires that the City make four findings in the consideration and approval of a site plan review. Two additional findings are required pursuant to MMC Section 17.62.060. Attachment 7 provides the applicant’s justification for the consideration of the proposed site plan review. 75

C. Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area Overlay (LIP Chapter 4) As previously discussed, the LCP ESHA Overlay map shows a stream diagonally across the parcel’s frontage. However, the proposed development is sited outside the stream ESHA buffer and the fuel modification of the proposed additions will not extend any further into the ESHA buffer compared to the previously approved residence’s required fuel modification.

D. Native Tree Protection (LIP Chapter 5)
There are no native trees on or adjacent to the subject parcel.

E. Scenic, Visual and Hillside Resource Protection (LIP Chapter 6) The Scenic, Visual, and Hillside Resource Protection Chapter governs those CDP applications concerning any parcel of land that is located along, within, provides views to, or is visible from any scenic area, scenic road or public viewing area. As discussed previously, the proposed development does not appear to be visible from any scenic area, scenic road, or public viewing area.

E. Transfer of Development Credit (LIP Chapter 7)
The proposed project does not include a land division or multi-family development.

F. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
LIP Section 9.3 requires that analysis of the project consider geologic, flood and fire hazards, structural integrity, or other potential hazards listed in LIP Sections 9.2(A)(1-7).

Pursuant to LIP Chapter 9, on January 17, 2024, the City geotechnical consultant reviewers determined the proposed project if constructed in accordance with the recommendations from the project’s geotechnical consultant contained in Geologic and Geotechnical Reports from GeoConcepts, Inc. meets the requirements of the LIP. The aforementioned report is referenced in the Geotechnical Review Sheet in Attachment 3 and is available on file at City Hall and online at MalibuCity.org/OnBase.

The report evaluates site-specific conditions and recommendations are provided to address any pertinent issues. Based on the submitted reports, the project is not located in a hazard zone, except that the project site is located within an extreme fire hazard area.

Based on review of the project plans and associated geotechnical reports by City Environmental Health Administrator, City Public Works Department, City geotechnical consultant reviewers, and LACFD, these specialists determined that adverse impacts associated with these hazards to the project site related to the proposed development are not expected.
76

Based on the submitted materials, the proposed project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability from geologic, flood, or fire hazards. In summary, the proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency’s building codes are followed.

Fire Hazard
The entire City of Malibu is designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, a zone defined by a more destructive behavior of fire and a greater probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. The subject property is currently subject to wildfire hazards.

The scope of work proposed as part of this application is not expected to have an adverse impact on wildfire hazards and should the Planning Commission consider approving the project, the project will be conditioned to meet all LACFD requirements.

G. Shoreline and Bluff Development (LIP Chapter 10)
LIP Chapter 10 applies to land that is located on or along the shoreline, a coastal bluff or bluff-top fronting the shoreline. The proposed project is not located near the shore.

H. Public Access (LIP Chapter 12)
LIP Section 12.4 requires public access for lateral, bluff-top, and vertical access near the ocean, trails, and recreational access for the following cases:

A. New development on any parcel or location specifically identified in the Land Use Plan or in the LCP zoning districts as appropriate for or containing a historically used or suitable public access trail or pathway.

B. New development between the nearest public roadway and the sea.

C. New development on any site where there is substantial evidence of a public right of access to or along the sea or public tidelands, a blufftop trail or an inland trail acquired through use or a public right of access through legislative authorization.

D. New development on any site where a trail, bluff top access or other recreational access is necessary to mitigate impacts of the development on public access where there is no feasible, less environmentally damaging, project alternative that would avoid impacts to public access.

As described herein, the property is not located between the first public road and the sea, and the property is not located near a recreational area. The planned Zuma Ridge Trail is located approximately 30 feet north of the project site according to the LCP Parklands Map. That trail is currently unimproved. The proposed additions will not interfere with the future improvement or use of the trail.
77

I. Land Division (LIP Chapter 15)
This project does not include a land division.

J. Demolition Permit (MMC Chapter 17.70)
MMC Section 17.70.060 requires that a demolition permit be issued for projects that result in the demolition of any building or structure. The project includes the demolition of the existing hardscape. If approved, the project will include conditions of approval, including the recycling of demolished materials to ensure that the proposed project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts.

MMC Section 17.70.060 requires that a development plan has been approved or the requirement waived by the City. This CDP application is being processed concurrently with DP No. 24-020; therefore, approval of the demolition permit is subject to the approval of CDPWF No. 23-004.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Director has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Director found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(e), (l) - Existing Facilities, 15303(d), (e) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, 15304(b) - Minor Alterations to Land. The Planning Director has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

CORRESPONDENCE: The following written correspondence has been submitted to date (Attachment 6 – Public Correspondence):
• Email Dated April 5, 2024, from Charlotte Frieze expressing concerns regarding the project
• Email Dated June 3, 2024, from Lynn Saunders expressing concerns regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 2, 2024, from Richard Stutsman expressing concern regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 2, 2024, from Dawn Ericson expressing concern regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 2, 2024, from Lotte Cherin expressing concern regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 3, 2024, from Vitoria Tang expressing suggestions regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 2, 2024, from Peter C Jones expressing concern regarding the project.
78

• Email Dated June 2, 2024, from Bill Sampson expressing concern regarding the project.
• Email Dated June 3, 2024, from Michel Bolour regarding the project.

PUBLIC NOTICE: On May 9, 2024, staff published a Notice of Public Hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and a notice was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-foot radius of the subject property.

SUMMARY: Based on the analysis contained in this report, provided project plans and other documents, the Planning Commission shall provide direction to staff to bring back a resolution consistent with the Planning Commission’s decision.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Project Plans

2. Department Review Sheets

3. Fuel Modification Exhibit

4. Story Pole Site Photographs

5. Public Correspondence

6. Public Hearing Notice

7. Site Plan Review Findings
79 29738 CUTHBERT RD

SETBACK
S
E
T
BAC
K

SETBACK

SETBACK
2 0
0 .
7 6
'
P
L
428.23' PL
187.
52 '
PL
HOUSE
POOL
T.C. TRELLIS & BATHROOM
EQ
EQ
E
Q
E
Q

65.03 513.84' PL

70.60 23.47
2 3
.
4 7
OWTS
63' - 0"
4 6
'
-
0 "

PROPERTY LINE
101
A101
1 SIM
Room name
150 SF
1 / A101
1 View Name 1/8" = 1'-0"
1t
0 DOOR NUMBERWINDOW NUMBER

CALLOUT HEAD

ROOM NAMESPOT ELEVATIONVIEW REFERENCEVIEW TITLE

GRID HEAD

NORTH ARROW
SECTION HEADSECTION TAIL 1i WALL TAG

LEVEL HEAD
A101
1 Ref
1 Ref 1 Ref
1 Ref

ELEVATION MARK
Name
Elevation
1 A101
SIM
HOUSEPOOLT.C. TRELLIS& BATH

NORTH PL EAST PL SOUTH PL WEST PL

STRUCTURE DISTANCE TO PL
105' 26' 208' 74'190' 90' 215' 70'358' 102' 82' 84'

STRUCTURE
OWTS 340' 5' 29' 107'
187.75' FT
470.69' FT
LOT DEPTH: 470.69' FT
FRONT SETBACK 20% (94.14' FT) OR 65' FT, WHICHEVER IS LESS = 65.00' FTREAR SETBACK 15% (70.60' FT) OR 15' FT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER = 70.60' FT LOT WIDTH: 187.75' FT
SIDE SETBACK CUMULATIVELY 25% OF WIDTH (46.93' FT/2 = 23.47' FT) OR 10% OF WIDTH (18.78' FT), WHICHEVER IS GREATER = 23.47' FT 90°

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/23/2024 11:12:53 AM
As indicated

COVER SHEET

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A0.0
GENERAL NOTES1.0 - GENERAL - ALL WORK SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE IBC, CBC, CRC, NEC, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, APPLICABLE NFPA CODES, ALL CITY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE OSHA GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.1.1 - THE WORD "CONTRACTOR" MEANS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND, WHERE APPLICABLE BY TRADE, SUBCONTRACTORS. -CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING ALL NOTES PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.
-ALL CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL WORKS, DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARE ALSO TO BE ADVISED REGARDING ANY DISCREPANCIES IN MEASUREMENT, DIMENSION, LOCATION OR DETAILS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR'S PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. -WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL PREVAIL OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS ON DRAWINGS. IN NO EVENT IS A DIMENSION TO BE SCALED OFF THE DRAWINGS WITHOUT FIRST ADVISING THE ARCHITECT. -PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONTRACT PRICES, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND COORDINATING ALL NOTES AND DRAWINGS TO INCLUDE ANY SUBCONTRACTOR'S SHEETS OR NOTES, BUT WHICH ARE INDICATED ELSEWHERE IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. -DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW FINAL EFFECT OF PARTS OF CONSTRUCTION. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT PARTICULAR JOB SITE DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS AND SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE WORK. ANY MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED ARE TO BE FIRST REVIEWED AND CONFIRMED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.1.2 - CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL ITEMS NOTED "VERIFY OR CONFIRM WITH OWNER OR ARCHITECT" WHICH MIGHT AFFECT COSTS PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND SUBCONTRACTS, AND SHALL CONFIRM DECISIONS REGARDING SELECTION, MATERIALS, COLOR, FINISH OR OTHER SPECIFICATIONS NOT YET DECIDED REGARDING THESE ITEMS. -CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE THE COST OF THESE ITEMS WITHIN THE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE.-UNLESS ITEMS ARE SPECIFICALLY ITEMIZED AS NOT INCLUDED IN CONTRACT (NIC), THEY WILL BE ASSUMED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE. -ALL ALLOWANCE ITEMS SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ALLOWANCES AND INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY EXTRA COSTS ARISING FROM THE EXECUTION OF HIS CONTRACT OR SUBCONTRACTS AND SHALL RECEIVE OWNER'S WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR SAME. -CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING THAT ALL GENERAL AND SUBCONTRACT WORK IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED ACCORDING TO THE MOST CURRENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING REVISIONS. -UNLESS ITEMS ARE SPECIFICALLY ITEMIZED AS NOT INCLUDED IN CONTRACT (NIC), THEY WILL BE ASSUMED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE. -ALL ALLOWANCE ITEMS SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ALLOWANCES AND INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY EXTRA COSTS ARISING FROM THE EXECUTION OF HIS CONTRACT OR SUBCONTRACTS AND SHALL RECEIVE OWNER'S WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR SAME. -CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING THAT ALL GENERAL AND SUBCONTRACT WORK IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED ACCORDING TO THE MOST CURRENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING REVISIONS. -UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE, OWNER SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE IN ADDITION TO CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE TO COVER ALL NEW WORK. THIS INSURANCE SHALL INCLUDE THE INTERESTS OF THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR IN THE WORK, BUT SHALL NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER CONTRACT OR AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.1.3 - CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PREMISES SECURE, CLEAN, AND HAZARD FREE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING HIS EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND WORK IN NEAT, CLEAN, ORDERLY AND SAFE CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.1.4 - CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL NEW WORK, AND REMOVE ALL EXCESS DEBRIS AND MATERIALS, NOT REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION OR REQUESTED BY OWNER. -TEMPORARY ERECTION BRACING, GUYS, ETC. INSTALLATION DESIGN AND REMOVAL ARE THE COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY BARRICADES AND DUST-PROOF PARTITIONS AS NEEDED FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENT, AND SHALL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF HIS WORK AND THE OWNER'S PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE OR LOSS ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION.1.5 - CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY TOILET FACILITIES ON THE JOB SITE IF NECESSARY OR REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODE. -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY TEMPORARY POWER AND TELEPHONE SERVICE WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO START OF THE CONSTRUCTION. -CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO POWER, WATER, PHONE, SANITATION ETC. ALL TEMP. UTILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS.1.6 - ALL GLAZING SHALL HAVE A TEMPORARY LABEL ON THE PRODUCT UNTIL INSPECTED BY THE CITY FIELD INSPECTOR. -ALL GLAZING IN HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS SHALL BE TEMPERED INCLUDING SLIDING GLASS DOORS, BATHROOM WINDOWS IN TUB ENCLOSURES, SHOWER ENCLOSURES, AND GLAZING WITHIN 24" OF DOORS, 18" OF FLOOR.

RENDERING OF THE BUILDING

CUTHBERT ROAD
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
A WOOLSEY FIRE REBUILD PROJECT. 1. PV PHASE REBUILDING A PORTION OF THE (E) FOOTPRINT (1,520 SF).2. CDP PHASE, ADDING (N) BLDG 100' AWAY FROM THE WATER COURSE (BLUELINE STREAM) WITH (N) 2ND FL, (N) POOL, (RECONFIGURED) DRIVEWAY, AND(N) OWTS.

SCOPE OF WORKPROJECT DETAILS
SITE ADDRESS 29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA ZIP CODE 90265ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (APN) 4469-041-011BOOK 58 PAGES 28 & 29LOT 15 BLOCK 2GROSS LOT AREA 88,406 SF (ACERS 2.029)NET LOT AREA (LESS SLPS. 1:1 & EASMENTS) 88,156 SF (ACERS 2.023)LOT WIDTH 187.75' FT LOT DEPTH 470.69' FT MMC ZONING DESIGNATION RR2CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE - VBBUILDING USE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & ADUNUMBER OF STORIES 2 STORYNUMBER OF PARKING 3 COVERED, 2 OPENVERY HIGH FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE YESSPRINKLER*** YESBUILDING HEIGHT 24'MAX. ALLOWED DEVELOPMENT SF 8500 SFMAX. ALLOWED IMPERMEABLE AREA 26521 SF (88,406 x 30% = 26521 SF)GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALTOTAL DEVELOPMENT SF PROPOSED: 8,492 SF PV APP.: 3,872 SFIMPERMEABLE SURFACES PROPOSED: 16,932 SF PV APP.: 19,919 SFTRELLIS AREA PROPOSED: 1085 SFNEW GATES 1 NEW VIEW PERMEABLE GATENEW FENCING (VIEW PERMEABLE) 1142 LF NEW FENCING & GATE HEIGHT 6' FTNEW RETAINING WALLS 0 LFPERMEABLE GARDEN SITTING TERRACES 3060 SFSWIMMING POOL SAFETY PROPERTY FENCING & POOL FENCING2/3 RULE VOLUME AT 11' HIGH: 60,555 , VOLUME AT 10' HIGH: 39,040 2/3 CALCULATION:
60555 / 3 = 20,185 = 1/320,185 x 2 = 40370 = 2/339040 < 40370 SECOND FL. VOLUME = 39,040 WHICH IS LESS THAN 2/3 OF FIRST FL. VOLUME OF 40370 *** AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R313- SHALL BE APPROVED BY PLUMBING DIVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.The pre-Woolsey fire site development footprint was large. Small buildings were scatteredthroughout the parcel. In many locations the site was disturbed less than 100’ from a blue line water course crossing the northwest corner of the property. The proposed rebuild is concentrated, has a smaller footprint, and the majority of the development is located 100’ from the blue line water course.The project proposes a single-family residence using a combination of existing house footprint and a new footprint. The pre-fire stables, garage, storage building, guest house burned and have been removed. The guest house septic system is to be removed. In the pre-Woolsey Fire site plan the guest house was approximately 35’ from the blue line water course and the septic system serving the guest house approximately 75’ from the blue line water course.As a part of the proposed project, a portion of the old house footprint is reused (see sheet A1.0, exhibit A5). The majority of new development is located 100’ from the blue line water course. The replacement pool follows a similar strategy: 30% of the pool is approximately 80’ from the blue line (where it was prior to the fire), but the remainder is beyond the 100’ offset line.New fencing, view permable, 1142 linear feet. 1 new view permeable gate (without pilasters). Waterpermeable garden sitting terraces equal 3060 SF. Pool safety will be provided by property line fencing and removable pool fencing. MODIFICATIONS: None requested.

BUILDING SETBACKS

PARCEL MAP

PROJECT DESCRIPTIONLEGEND KEY
8/03/2023 3:13:41 PM
80 ATTACHMENT 1
APPROX. REFERENCE POINT IN PREVIOUS SURVEY
A0.6
81 A0.6A
82 PRE-FIRE IMPERMEABLE AREAS 19,919 SF
POOL

EXISTING HOUSE
(E) SEPTIC PITS 2,000 GALLON

POOL HOUSE
662 SF
2,932 IMPERMEABLE AREA OF THE

HOUSE ADJACENT TO BLUE LINE
STREAM
100' - 0"
0' 10' 30' 50' 100

MALIBU/COASTAL COMMISSION DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE (E) SERVICE CROSSING
(E) WATER COURSE

PROPOSED BUILDING

FOOTPRINT
187
'
-
6 "
513' - 10"
2 0
0 '
-
9 "
428' - 3"
P.L.
(E) FENCE
0' 10' 30' 50' 100
(E) TENNIS COURT TO BE

REPAIRED SURFACE

RESTORED
(E) FENCE

OUTDOOR
GARDEN

SITTING
AREA 1

IMPERMEABLE DRIVEWAY

TENNIS COURT
(IMPERMEABLE)
(N) TENNIS CT

TOILET ROOM
POOL
SPA
BAJA

OUTDOOR
GARDEN

SITTING
AREA 2

OUTDOOR
GARDEN

SITTING
AREA 5

OUTDOOR
GARDEN

SITTING
AREA 4

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 5

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 6

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 7

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 8
662 SF

REMOVED

STRUCTURE

ADJACENT TO BLUE
LINE STREAM.

REMOVED
SEPTIC
SYSTEM

CLOSE TO BLUE LINE
STREAM.

PROPOSED PROJECT RECIVED

CREDIT FOR REMOVAL OF

POOL HOUSE, SEPTIC SYSTEM,

AND PAVING
220 SF - REMOVED

IMPERMEABLE AREA

PREVIOUS

POOL HOUSE
STEPS 1
STEPS 4 STEPS 3 STEPS 2

OUTDOOR
GARDEN

SITTING
AREA 3

PROPOSED IMPERMEABLE AREA
100' - 0"
PROPOSED IMPERMEABLE AREAS 16,932 SFPROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT 5817 SFPROPOSED KITCHEN ENTRANCE/STAIRS 639 SFPROPOSED DRIVEWAY 3308 SF(E) TENNIS CT 7036 SFPROPOSED TENNIS CT TOILET ROOM 132 SF

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
2/3/2024 9:39:26 AM
1/16" = 1'-0"

IMPERMEABLE
AREAS

COMPARISON

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A0.7
3,594 SF PRE-FIRE IMPERMEABLE AREA ADJACENT TO BLUE LINE STREAM

PRE-FIRE IMPERMEABLE AREA
REDUCED DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS 1.REDCED IMPERMEABLE AREA IN 100’ BLUELINE STREAM PROXIMITY ZONE 882 SF2.REDUSED IMPERMEABLE AREA THROUGH THE SITE BY 2,987 SF 83 UP
TERRACE 2 TERRACE 1
TERRACE 3
POOL

FIRST FLOOR AREA SQFT
TERRACE 5 TERRACE 4
SPA
BAJA
FIRST FLOOR AREA 5505 SF
FIRST FLOOR VOLUME (INCLUDING WALLS) 5780 SF

OPEN TERRACE FULL OCEAN VIEW

RAISED ROOF ABOVE KITCHEN

SECOND FLOOR AREA SQFT

STAIR TOWER

OPENING
SECOND FLOOR AREA 2855 SF
SECOND FLOOR VOLUME (INCLUDING WALLS) 3715 SF
24'
18'

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:09 PM
1/16" = 1'-0"
2/3

CALCULATION

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A0.9
FLOOR
2/3 RULE CALCULATION
5780 SF3715 SF
FIRST FLOOR ....................................SECOND FLOOR ....................................2/3 OF FIRST FLOOR 2/3 CALCULATION 5780 / 3 = 1926.6 = 1/31926.6 x 2 = 3853.3 = 2/3
SECOND FL.AREA= 3715 SF WHICH IS LESS THAN 2/3 OF FIRST FL. AREA OF 3853 SF 84 34
5 '
-
0 3"4
2 '-
0 "
34 2
'
-
0 "
351'
- 0"
352' - 0"
3 3
7 '
-
0 "33
8 '
-
0 "
33 9
'
-
0 "
34 0
'
-
0 "
34 1
'
-
0 "
34 2
'
-
0 "
34 3
'
-
0 "
34 4
'
-
0 "
34 5
'
-
0 "
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
4 A7.1
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1
3 F1
1 A7.0
5 A7.1
POOL
(E) SERVICE CROSSING
(E) WATER COURSE
187'
-
6 "
513' - 10"
2 0
0 '
-
9 "
428' - 3"
(N) FENCE 290 LF (VIEW PERMEABLE)

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK

SETBACK
(E) TENNIS COURT TO BE REPAIRED SURFACE
RESTORED. (E) LIGHT STANDARDS TO BE
REPAINTED & FIXTURES RELAMPED.

TWO MOBILE BASKETBALL HOOPS

TENNIS COURT NET AND REMOVABLE END POLES

KITCHEN SERVICE ENTRANCE

FIRE DEPARTMENT

TURNAROUND

F PARALLEL GRID LINE H

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY

ENTRANCE COURTYARD LOADING AREADOOR PROTECTION OVERHANG APN: 4469-041-011
BLDG. OUTLINE AT LEVEL 1
BLDG. OUTLINE AT LEVEL 2

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 1

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 2 PERMEABLE
GARDEN
SITTING AREA 3
SPA
6 A7.1

SETBACK
S
E
T
B
AC
K
SITE LIGHTING: EXISITNG TENNIS CT LIGHTS (SURVIVED FIRE STORM) TO REMAIN. (N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
(E) TENNIS COURT
7036 SF

IMPERMEABLE
513.84' PL
2 0
0 .
7 6
'
P
L
428.23' PL
(187.
52 '
PL)

ENTRANCE
COURT BALCONY 8
BALCONY 6 BALCONY 7
(E) WEST, EAST & SOUTH PL FENCE TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE
EXTRA

PARKING
30' - 0" 20' - 0"
10' - 0"
14' - 6" 10' - 0"

TRELLIS FOR VIEWING TENNIS,
55% OPEN TO SKY (GROUND

SURFACE PERMEABLE)
DESIGNATED 100' FT OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE PER MEETINGS WITH DAVE CRAWFORD (N) ACCESS DRIVEWAY TO GARAGE(N) MOTORIZED DOUBLE SWING DRIVEWAY GATE, VIEW PERMEABLE, 6' FT TALL x 20' FT WIDE (E) NORTH PL FENCE WEST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE POWER POLE 1 (TO BE REMOVED)
POWER POLE 2

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 4
PERMEABLE GARDEN SITTING AREA 5

PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREAS

STAIRS ON GRADE
19' 70'

TRASH & RECYCLING
(OPEN TO SKY)

POOL EQIPTMENT

SCREENED W/

LANDSCAPING

DRIVEWAY CURB

TENNIS CT TOILET ROOM & SHOWER (C)

PLANTER
BAJA
4' 3' DRIVEWAY BACKUP
(N) PROPOSED OWTS FIELD BOUNDARY
(N) NORTH PL FENCE EAST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE TO BE REPLACE 21' - 0"
OUTLINED COLOR FOR PV APPROVED AREAS WITHN100' FT OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE 14' - 10"
1 9
'
-
9 "
1 0
'
-
6 "

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 5

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 6

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 7

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 8
70' - 6"
9' - 0"
14' - 6" 8
'
-
6 "
63' - 0"
4 6
'
-
0 "
0' 10' 30' 50' 100
REF PT 4
20°
PROPOSED IMPERMEABLE AREAS 16,932 SF
PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT 5817 SFPROPOSED KITCHEN ENTRANCE/STAIRS 639 SFPROPOSED DRIVEWAY 3308 SF(E) TENNIS CT 7036 SFPROPOSED TENNIS CT TOILET ROOM 132 SF

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 7:09:52 PM
1/16" = 1'-0"

SITE PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A1.0
85 (N) FENCE 290 LF (VIEW PERMEABLE)
(E) TENNIS COURT TO BE REPAIRED SURFACE
RESTORED. (E) LIGHT STANDARDS TO BE
REPAINTED & FIXTURES RELAMPED.

TENNIS COURT NET AND REMOVABLE END POLES
S
E
T
B
AC
K
(E) TENNIS COURT
7036 SF

IMPERMEABLE
2 0
0 .
7 6
'
P
L

TRELLIS FOR VIEWING TENNIS,
55% OPEN TO SKY (GROUND

SURFACE PERMEABLE)

TENNIS CT TOILET ROOM & SHOWER (C)
(N) OWTS PROPOSED BOUNDARY
(E) 8 TENNIS COURT LIGHTS, TYP.
9' - 0"
14' - 6"
8 '
-
6 "
63' - 0"
4 6
'
-
0 "

REAR YARD SET BACK LINESIDE YARD SET BACK LINE

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/23/2024 11:02:45 AM
1" = 10'-0"

TENNIS COURT

PERMIT RECORD

SITE PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A0.4B
ELECTRICAL OCT 1986, 4 LIGHTS ELECTRICAL MARCH 1988, 2 OUTLETS ELECTRICAL JULY 1988, 4 LIGHTS ELECTRICAL OCT 1986, 200 AMP

TENNIS COURT PERMIT HISTORY
86 FOOTPRINTS OF BUILDINGS DESTROYED

BY FIRE & REMOVED A PART OF FEMA

POST FIRE CLEAN UP

SEPTIC TO BE REMOVED

SEPTIC TO BE REMOVED
TENNIS COURT VIEWING SLAB 162 SF

DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED

POOL SHELL TO

BE REMOVED

SLAB TO BE REMOVED

WALKWAY TO BE

REMOVED
T.C. VIEWING AREA SLABTO BE REMOVED

TURNAROUND AREA

TO BE REMOVED
1 1
2 3
32 4
45 5
6 7
8 867
WALKWAY SLAB & STAIRS 1082 SFSEPTIC TANKSPOOL SHELL 734 SFPOOL & PATIO SLAB 1736 SFSEPTIC TANKSDRIVEWAY TURNAROUND SLAB 2337 SFDRIVEWAY SLAB 1414 SF

EXISTING HARDSCAPE FOR DEMOLITION

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:14 PM
1/16" = 1'-0"

HARDSCAPE

DEMO PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A1.2B
87 UP

DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE PER MEETINGS WITH DAVE CRAWFORD POOL

SETBACK

SETBACK

TENNIS COURT NET AND REMOVABLE END POLES

FIRE DEPARTMENT

TURNAROUND

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY

ENTRANCE COURTYARD LOADING AREADOOR PROTECTION OVERHANG APN: 4469-041-011

ON-GRADE
TERRACE 1

ON-GRADE
TERRACE 2

SETBACK
S
E
T
B
AC
K
(N) PROPOSED OWTS (N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
(E) TENNIS COURT
7125 SF

IMPERMEABLE
513.84' PL
2 0
0 .
7 6
'
P
L
428.23' PL
187.
52'
PL

ENTRANCE
COURT
(E) NORTH PL GATE & FENCE TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE
BALCONY 8
BALCONY 6 BALCONY 7
6' PLASTERED CMU WALL

WALL MOUNTED WATER FEATURE
30' - 0" 20' - 0"
10' - 0"

UNENCLOSED & OPEN TO THE SKY

AREA FOR VIEWING TENNIS
(GROUND SURFACE PERMEABLE).
8' - 0"
(N) 3 - 3' x 80' LEACH TRENCHES
W 3' ROCK (ACTIVE)
(N) 3 - 3' x 80' LEACH TRENCHES
W 3' ROCK (FUTURE)
8 0
'
5 '

POWER POLE TO BE REMOVED
8'
1500 GALLON W/ EFFLUENT FILTER
500 GALLON W/ EFFLUENT FILTER
TENNIS CT. TOILET ROOM & SHOWER
0' 10' 30' 50' 100

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:13 PM
1/16" = 1'-0"

OWTS SITE PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A1.2A
88 ARCHITECT
OWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:14 PM

EXISTING SITE

DIAGRAM

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A2
89 UP
UP
DN
UP
UP
UP
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
4 A7.1
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1

MAIN ENTRANCE

NATIVE PLANTING
(GARDEN)
POOL
RAMP 1
RAMP
2 RAMP 4 RAMP 3

ENTRANCE COURTYARD
MMC: 17.48.030
STALL 2 STALL 3
1 A7.0

MAIN ENTRANCE

DOOR W/

CANOPY ABOVE
(1) W.H. NORTH END OF HOUSE 1ST & 2FL
(1) W.H. GRND FLOOR
BALCONY 1
BALCONY 2

PERMEABLE OUTDOOR
GARDEN SITTING AREA 5
5 A7.1
BAJA
(F PARALLEL TO GRID LINE H)
SEAT
15% 6%
10%
POWDER
ROOM
POWDER
FOYER

KITCHEN SERVICE

ENTRANCE

CONCRETE SLAB
CLOSET
STEAM

SHOWER TOILET
SHOWER
BAR
SINK 1
SHOWER 2 SHOWER 1
(1) W.H. SCND FLOOR
(1) SOLAR WATER TANK

LAUNDRY

COUNTER

UTILITY
SINK 1
BAR
BBQ
SINK 1

OPTIONAL

ACOUSTICAL &

BLACK-OUT CURTAIN
SPA
DINING

MILLWORK/CLOSET

MILLWORK/CLOSET

MILLWORK/CLOSET
(1) WTR DISPENSER
BAR SINK 2
ADU

KITCHENETTE
1' - 2" 1' - 5" 7' - 6" 9' - 0" 9' - 0" 1' - 0"
STALL 1

SOLAR SYSTEM BATTERIES
320.83'
324.00'
320.83' 324.00' 325.16'
320.83'
327.00'
327.00'
L3 L2 L1
324.00'
325.16'
327.00'
6 A7.1
STAIR 8
STAIR 8

LANDING
BOTTOM
LANDING 8
STAIR 1
BOTTOM LANDING 1
(3) OVERHEAD

DOWNLIGHTS ABOVE

MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR
W D
PANTRY

SHELVES
20 '
-
9 "
7 '
-
6 "

PROPOSED FLOOR AREA WITHIN PREVIOUS PLANNING VERIFICATION FOR DISASTER REBUILD

GARAGE DOOR
(OPEN TO SKY)

PERMEABLE

OUTDOOR GARDEN
SITTING AREA 4

PERMEABLE OUTDOOR
GARDEN SITTING AREA 3

PERMEABLE OUTDOOR
GARDEN SITTING AREA 2

PERMEABLE OUTDOOR
GARDEN SITTING AREA 1

PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR AREA

POOL EQUIPMENT

SCREENED W/

LANDSCAPING
2' - 10"
0' - 7" 18' - 0" 0' - 9"
0' - 7" 15' - 0" 3' - 9"
BEDROOM SUITE 1
BATH 1BATH 2

ADU/BEDROOM

ADU BATH

ADU LIVING
AREA
GARAGE

TRASH &

RECYCLING

BEDROOM
SUITE 2
POOL

CHANGING

ROOM GREAT ROOM

GAME ROOM
PANTRY

KITCHEN
DINING
ROOM

ENTRY HALL
LOUNGE
ROOM
1 A8.1
7' - 2" 5' - 9" 0' - 8"

ELEVATOR
A7.2
2 PERMEABLE STAIRS

ON GRADE TO

TENNIS COURT RAISED

ROOF ABOVE
D20
D19
D5
D20D20
D20
D20
D20D20
10 10
12 GD3-1
GD3-2
GD2-1
GD4-1
10 GD6-1
D6
D1
8 6
10 GD12
14 13
9'
ELEC. PANEL & METER
D16 D17
D15
A6.1
1 10
A6.7
1 D19
321.89' 320.29'
326.88' 323.88' 327.00'
323.88'
321.89'
320.66' 320.83'
323.73'

PLANTER GRASS HILL

DRIVEWAY
STAIR 9
7T @ 11"
8R @ 4.75"
STAIR 5
5T @ 11"
6R @ 6"
STAIR 4
3T @ 11"
4R @ 5 3/8"
STAIR 3
3T @ 11"
4R @ 5 3/8"
STAIR 2
T AS NEEDED @ 11"
R AS NEEDED @ 5 3/8"

TOP & BOTTOM ELEVATION OF STAIR
5 TO BE SLOPED FOR DRAINAGE AT

SAME ELEVATION AS INTERIOR
A6.3
1 326.88'
329.65'
330.00'
326.88'
A6.9
1 A6.10
1 OPEN SHELVING
A6.9
A6.9 11
12 D20
D5
D20
0" 0"

POOL AREA WITHIN PREVIOUS PLANNING VERIFICATION FOR DISASTER REBUILD 4 3/4" OR GREATER WHEN SHEAR WALL PLY. REQ. INTERIOR WALL- 2X4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES)6" CONCRETE WALLSHAFT WALL - TYPE 2 - FIRE EXITSSHAFT WALL - TYPE 1 - ELEVATOR & TRASH CHUTE 8" CONCRETE WALL
10" CONCRETE WALL7 5/8" EXTERIOR WALLS-2X6 WOOD STUDS @16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD & CEMENT PLASTER W/ EXTERIOR FINISH (ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL)6 3/4" OR GREATER WHEN SHEAR WALL PLY. REQ. INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL- 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES)6 3/4" PARTY PLUMBING WALL- 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. PARTY WALL- 2X4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES) 12" CONCRETE WALL

WALL LEGEND
SOFFIT CEILING SHAFT WALL - TYPE 3 - GARAGE VENTILATION CHASE (CH METAL STUDS 20GA. 16" O.C. W/ 1" FIRE SHIELD SHAFT LINER)SHAFT WALL - TYPE 4 - FLR. TO FLR. UTILITY CHASE (FLR. PENETRATED BY PIPING MAX 4" DIA. & SEALED AT FLR. CLG.) TRELLIS AREA: UNENCLOSED & 51% OPEN

TO THE SKY, AREA FOR VIEWING TENNIS
(GROUND SURFACE PERMEABLE, 1085 SF)
TRELLIS POSTS. TRELLIS BEAMS ABOVE.

SEAT
8' - 7" 11' - 0"
32' - 6" 4' - 1" 12' - 1"
D2
NOTES

1. CONCRETE DECK COATING: VULCAN 350/351 GRAY BY TREMCO. APPLY MIN. 28D. AFTER CONC. POUR. FINISH AND PREPARE CONC. AND INSTALL SYSTEM IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH MFG'S SPECS. NON-SLIP FINISH.

2. ON EVERY FLOOR: ON-DEMAND WATER HEATER ENCLOSURES - VERIFY WATER HEATER DIMS & CLEARANCES WITH MFG. SPECS. PRIOR TO FRAMING3. FIRE BARRIER SEPARATIO: PROVIDE A ONE (1) HOUR FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND RESIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 508 AND TABLE 508.4. BUILDING CODE 508.4.4.

OPENINGS IN THE FIRE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 20 MINUTE RATING, BE SELF-CLOSING, SELF-LATCHING, TIGHT FITTING AND SMOKE SEALED.

4. SHAFT ENCLOSURE OPENINGS: OPENINGS THROUGH A FLOOR / CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SHAFT ENCLOSURE OF FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY BUILDING CODE SECTION 708. BUILDING CODE 708.2

5. EXTERIOR GLAZING AND WINDOW WALLS: EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS, GLAZED DOORS, AND GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING:

A. MULTI-PANE GLAZING UNITS WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE

6. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO BE PROVIDED WITH CODE REQUIRED OVERFLOW DRAINS AND DEBRIS GUARD.

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:16 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

FIRST FLOOR
PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A5.0

1. CONCRETE DECK 2. CONCRETE WALL 3. PLANTER 4. PLANTER WALL5. ROOF DRAIN6. LANDSCAPING 7. LINE OF OVERHANG ABOVE8. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM9. ELECTRICAL RISER 10. PLUMBING RISER 11. UTILITY CHASE 12. HANDRAIL13. GUARDRAIL14. TRELLIS 15. POST/COLUMN 16. EXTERIOR DECK FINISH 17. RAISED DECK18. WATER PROOFING MEMBRANE19. WATER PROOFING PROTECTION SYSTEM 20. BACKFILL21. ROOFING MEMBRANE 22. FLASHING SYSTEM 23. INTERIOR FINISH CERAMIC TILE/ MANUFACTURED STONE24. EXTERIOR FINISH/PLASTER 25. MATERIAL CONTROL JOINT 26. WATER RESILIENT FINISH 27. MILLWORK 28. COUNTER TOP 29. EQUIPMENT 30. WINDOW COVERING RECESS 31. SEISMIC SHUT OFF VALVES32. CLEAN OUT YARD BOX33. ELECTRICAL PANEL 34. COMMUNICATIONS/INTERNET PANEL35. DOORBELL/ INTERCOM 36. INSULATION R-3037. INSULATION R-3838. INSULATION R-1939. INSULATION R-1340. INSULATION R-541. FUTURE LOCATION OF SOLAR PANELS 42. TEMPERED, LAMINATED, FROSTED GLASS 43. FURRED ONE HOUR SEPARATION

PLAN KEYNOTES
FIRST FLOOR AREA 5505SFOUTLINED COLOR FOR PV APPROVED AREAS100' FT OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE 90 2
A7.0
3 A7.1
4 A7.1
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1
ROOF DECK TERRACE 1

FULL OCEAN VIEW

OPEN TO
BELOW

RAISED ROOF

ABOVE KITCHEN

OPEN ENTRY

COURT BELOW
L6 L5 L4
331.83'
STAIR 1
STAIR 8
STAIR 6
333.17'

OPEN TO
BELOW
BALCONY 6
BALCONY 4

OPEN TO BELOW
(NO BALCONY 3)
STAIR 8

LANDING
TOP
LANDING 8
STAIR 1

LANDING
TOP
LANDING 1
BALCONY 5
BALCONY 7
1 A7.0
5 A7.1

MILLWORK/CLOSET
SHOWER 3 SHOWER 4
SHOWER 5
BATH TUB 1
BATH TUB 2
SHOWER 6
BATH TUB 3
SHOWER 7

MILLWORK/CLOSET MILLWORK/CLOSET

MILLWORK/CLOSET

GYM SINK

MILLWORK/CLOSET
(1) WATER

DESPENSER
331.83'
337.50'
329.53'
337.50'
333.17'
RAMP 5 RAMP 7 RAMP 6
10%

MALIBU/COASTAL COMMISSION DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE

OVERHANG ABOVE

OPEN TO
BELOW
W D

LAUNDRY

COUNTER
UTILITYSINK 1

OPEN TRELLIS BELOW
BEDROOM SUITE 4

STORAGE
BATH 3
BEDROOM SUITE 3
BEDROOM SUITE 5

LAUNDRY
ROOM 2
BATH 5
BEDROOM SUITE 6
BATH 6

ELEVATOR
BATH 4
SUITE 4 CLOSET
GYM
BATH 7
BEDROOM SUITE 7
HALL
337.04'
1 A8.1
3' - 4"
5 '
-
9 "

PRIVACY CURTAINS
D2
D2
D4
GD7GD9
D5
D2
D3
D3
D2
D3
GD16
D2
D3
24"
D5
GD11
11 7
9 5 GD5
16 15
7' - 0"
8%
ROOF DRAINAGE: COMBINE W DRAIN IN BR3 AT 2FL
ROOF DRAINAGE:

COMBINE W DRAIN
OF ROOF 6 AT 2FL
A6.5
1 A6.5
4 A6.8
1 A6.10
6 A6.10
7 A6.11
1 A6.11
2 A6.12
1 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR AREAS
4 3/4" OR GREATER WHEN SHEAR WALL PLY. REQ. INTERIOR WALL- 2X4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES)6" CONCRETE WALLSHAFT WALL - TYPE 2 - FIRE EXITSSHAFT WALL - TYPE 1 - ELEVATOR & TRASH CHUTE 8" CONCRETE WALL
10" CONCRETE WALL7 5/8" EXTERIOR WALLS-2X6 WOOD STUDS @16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD & CEMENT PLASTER W/ EXTERIOR FINISH (ONE HOUR FIRE RATED WALL)6 3/4" OR GREATER WHEN SHEAR WALL PLY. REQ. INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL- 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES)6 3/4" PARTY PLUMBING WALL- 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. PARTY WALL- 2X4 WOOD STUDS @ 16" O.C. W/ 5/8" GYP.BOARD AS REQ. (ALL SIDES) 12" CONCRETE WALL

WALL LEGEND
SOFFIT CEILING SHAFT WALL - TYPE 3 - GARAGE VENTILATION CHASE (CH METAL STUDS 20GA. 16" O.C. W/ 1" FIRE SHIELD SHAFT LINER)SHAFT WALL - TYPE 4 - FLR. TO FLR. UTILITY CHASE (FLR. PENETRATED BY PIPING MAX 4" DIA. & SEALED AT FLR. CLG.) NOTES

1. CONCRETE DECK COATING: VULCAN 350/351 GRAY BY TREMCO. APPLY MIN. 28D. AFTER CONC. POUR. FINISH AND PREPARE CONC. AND INSTALL SYSTEM IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH MFG'S SPECS. NON-SLIP FINISH.

2. ON EVERY FLOOR: ON-DEMAND WATER HEATER ENCLOSURES - VERIFY WATER HEATER DIMS & CLEARANCES WITH MFG. SPECS. PRIOR TO FRAMING3. FIRE BARRIER SEPARATIO: PROVIDE A ONE (1) HOUR FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND RESIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 508 AND TABLE 508.4. BUILDING CODE 508.4.4.

OPENINGS IN THE FIRE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 20 MINUTE RATING, BE SELF-CLOSING, SELF-LATCHING, TIGHT FITTING AND SMOKE SEALED.

4. SHAFT ENCLOSURE OPENINGS: OPENINGS THROUGH A FLOOR / CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SHAFT ENCLOSURE OF FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY BUILDING CODE SECTION 708. BUILDING CODE 708.2

5. EXTERIOR GLAZING AND WINDOW WALLS: EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS, GLAZED DOORS, AND GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING:

A. MULTI-PANE GLAZING UNITS WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE

6. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO BE PROVIDED WITH CODE REQUIRED OVERFLOW DRAINS AND DEBRIS GUARD.

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 7:20:13 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

SECOND FLOOR
PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A5.1

1. CONCRETE DECK 2. CONCRETE WALL 3. PLANTER 4. PLANTER WALL5. ROOF DRAIN6. LANDSCAPING 7. LINE OF OVERHANG ABOVE8. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM9. ELECTRICAL RISER 10. PLUMBING RISER 11. UTILITY CHASE 12. HANDRAIL13. GUARDRAIL14. TRELLIS 15. POST/COLUMN 16. EXTERIOR DECK FINISH 17. RAISED DECK18. WATER PROOFING MEMBRANE19. WATER PROOFING PROTECTION SYSTEM 20. BACKFILL21. ROOFING MEMBRANE 22. FLASHING SYSTEM 23. INTERIOR FINISH CERAMIC TILE/ MANUFACTURED STONE24. EXTERIOR FINISH/PLASTER 25. MATERIAL CONTROL JOINT 26. WATER RESILIENT FINISH 27. MILLWORK 28. COUNTER TOP 29. EQUIPMENT 30. WINDOW COVERING RECESS 31. SEISMIC SHUT OFF VALVES32. CLEAN OUT YARD BOX33. ELECTRICAL PANEL 34. COMMUNICATIONS/INTERNET PANEL35. DOORBELL/ INTERCOM 36. INSULATION R-3037. INSULATION R-3838. INSULATION R-1939. INSULATION R-1340. INSULATION R-541. FUTURE LOCATION OF SOLAR PANELS 42. TEMPERED, LAMINATED, FROSTED GLASS 43. FURRED ONE HOUR SEPARATION

PLAN KEYNOTES
ZZ
SECOND FLOOR AREA 2855SF
OUTLINED COLOR FOR PV APPROVED AREASWITH IN 100' FT OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE 91 UP
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1
1 A7.0
POOL545 SF2725 CF5' DEPTH
SPA
63 SF
190 CF
3' DEPTH
BAJA
210 SF
315 CF
1' 6" DEPTH

ROOF DECK
TERRACE 1

FULL OCEAN

VIEW RAISED ROOF

ABOVE KITCHEN
ROOF 1
ROOF 2
ROOF 5
ROOF 6
ROOF 3
ROOF 4
1 POOL2
3 POOL2
12 SOLAR HW
1 N
S
2 3 4

SOLAR PANELS
2' - 2"
2' - 2"
2' - 7" 2' - 8"

SPACING FOR

PERSONNEL

WALKWAY
5 67 9
111213
141516 17
1819202122
23242526
333435
3637
2728
303132
2' - 2" 2' - 2"
2' - 2"
26" SPACING
3' - 0" 2' - 2"
1' - 6"
1' - 2"
34 8 10
29 -
---
-
---
47' - 10"
20' - 11"
1 A8.1
SKYLIGHT 1
344.67'
345.67'
341.00' 343.67'
346.92'
337.04'
341.50'
345.67'

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 7:19:42 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

ROOF SOLAR
PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A5.2

ROOF NOTES

1. ALL ROOF SYSTEM PENETRATIONS ( PIPES, CONDUITS, ETC.) SHALL HAVE COLLARS FULLY SEALED AS RECOMMENDED BY ROOFING SYSTEM MFG.2. ALL STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS PENETRATING ROOF SYSTEM SHALL HAVE FULLY SEALED PITCH POCKET3. ROOFING MEMBRANE: (3) PLY TORCH-DOWN SYSTEM BY GAF W/ COOL ROOF REFLECTIVE COATING.4. ALL FLASHING PER ROOF MFG. SPECS.5. ALL WALL CAP FLASHING 24 GA. BONDERIZED SLOPED TOWARD ROOF W/ MIN. 3" SEAMS AND FULLY COUNTER-FLASHED AT WALL INTERSECTIONS6. ROOF GUTTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MEANS TO PREVENT THE ACCUMULATION OF LEAVES & DEBRIS IN THE GUTTER. (RESIDENTIAL CODE R327.534 AND BUILDING CODE 705A.4)

ROOF SPECIFICATIONS

1. MEMBRANE SHALL BE GAF. RUBBEROID TORCH GRANULAR W/ REFLECTIVE COATING, 15 YEAR WARRANTY, CLASS A. ENTIRE ROOFING SYSTEM INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PRIMERS, CANT STRIPS, FLASHING AND COUNTER-FLASHING SHALL BE INSTALL IN STRICT ADHERENCE TO MFG. SPECS. AND MFG. DATA SHEETS.

2. PROVIDE ADD- ALTERNATE FOR A 20 YEAR SYSTEM GUARANTEE FOR OWNER'S CONSIDERATION.

1. CONCRETE DECK 2. CONCRETE WALL 3. PLANTER 4. PLANTER WALL5. ROOF DRAIN6. LANDSCAPING 7. LINE OF OVERHANG ABOVE8. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM9. ELECTRICAL RISER 10. PLUMBING RISER 11. UTILITY CHASE 12. HANDRAIL13. GUARDRAIL14. TRELLIS 15. POST/COLUMN 16. EXTERIOR DECK FINISH 17. RAISED DECK18. WATER PROOFING MEMBRANE19. WATER PROOFING PROTECTION SYSTEM 20. BACKFILL21. ROOFING MEMBRANE 22. FLASHING SYSTEM 23. INTERIOR FINISH CERAMIC TILE/ MANUFACTURED STONE24. EXTERIOR FINISH/PLASTER 25. MATERIAL CONTROL JOINT 26. WATER RESILIENT FINISH 27. MILLWORK 28. COUNTER TOP 29. EQUIPMENT 30. WINDOW COVERING RECESS 31. SEISMIC SHUT OFF VALVES32. CLEAN OUT YARD BOX33. ELECTRICAL PANEL 34. COMMUNICATIONS/INTERNET PANEL35. DOORBELL/ INTERCOM 36. INSULATION R-3037. INSULATION R-3838. INSULATION R-1939. INSULATION R-1340. INSULATION R-541. FUTURE LOCATION OF SOLAR PANELS 42. TEMPERED, LAMINATED, FROSTED GLASS 43. FURRED ONE HOUR SEPARATION

PLAN KEYNOTES
ROOF SLOPE 1/8" PER FOOTEVERY 13' = 2" ROOF CANT
92 LOWER 2ND FL
331' - 10"
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
LOWER 1ST FL
322' - 3 31/32"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1
2ND FL
333' - 2 1/16"
1ST FL
324' - 0"
L3 RAMP 3
L2
RAMP 2
L1 RAMP 1
ROOF
348' - 0"
320.83'
8' - 9 1/2" 8' - 5"
11' - 7 1/2" 9' - 5 1/2"
325.16'
327.17'
343.67' 346.92'
333.17'
9' - 2" 11' - 0"
1' - 0" 8' - 6" 11' - 0"

HEIGHT LIMIT EXISITNG GRADE FINISHED SURFACE
10' - 6" 10' - 6"

PROPOSED

GARDEN BERM

PLANTER

ENTRY HALL
L6 RAMP 6
L5
RAMP 5
RAMP 4
L4
HALL BATH 7

KITCHEN BEYOND

ROOF W/ INTEGRATED GUTTER
24' - 0"7' - 8"
0' - 8" 9' - 8" 0' - 10" 8' - 6"
9' - 6"
6 1/2" 8" 8' - 9"
2"
5" 8"
7 '
-
1 "
8' - 2"
9' - 5" 10' - 6"
19' - 11"
9' - 10"
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
LOWER 2ND FL
ROOF
342' - 10"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
7 A8.0
8 A8.0
9 A8.1
1ST FL
324' - 0"
ROOF
348' - 0"
323.92'
325.16'
327.00'
320.85'
339.80'

ENTRANCECANOPY
1' - 4"
19' - 6"
9' - 2" 11' - 0"
20' - 2"
8' - 6" 8' - 1 1/2"
10' - 6" 9' - 5 1/2"
19' - 11 1/2"

EXISITNG GRADE

FINISHED FLOOR
10' - 6" 10' - 6"

POCHED AREAS IN GREY DEMARK

SECTION PLANE CUTTING THROUGH

FLOOR / WALL MASS
HEIGHT LIMIT 24' - 0"
FIRE DEPT.

TURN AROUND

CRAWLSPACE UNDER DECK

COMPACTED FILL
CUT

PARAPET IN BACKGROUND
ROOF BEYOND. SEE A3/7.1 FOR

HEIGHT LIMIT CLEARANCE

TRELLIS BEYOND

ADU LIVING AREA ADU/BEDROOM GARAGE

GAME ROOM
BEDROOM SUITE 5
BATH 5 BEDROOM SUITE 6
BEDROOM SUITE 7
STAIR 1
5" 8"
7' - 5"
10' - 0" 8' - 6"
9' - 10"
19' - 11" 1' - 0"
19' - 11"
9' - 10"
8' - 9 1/2"
8' - 5 1/2"
7' - 5 1/2"

EXTERIOR WALL

ROOM HEIGHTS
BEDROOM 2BEDROOM 3 & 5BEDROOM 3 BATHBEDROOM 4 & 6BEDROOM 7GREAT ROOMKITCHEN & MEDIA RMKITCHEN CLERESTORYGAME ROOMENTRANCE HALLGARAGE TOP OF
STEEL

MAX CEILING
HEIGHT
BEDROOM 1 & ADU 11'-0"
9'-2"10'-2"21'-8"10'-6"
9'-10"8'-6"9'-6"
9'-2" 8'-6"10'-6" 9'-10"9'-5" 8'-9"
9'-4"
10'-6" 9'-4"
GYM 9'-5" 8'-9"
21'-0"
14'-6" 13'-10"10'-4.5" 9'-8.5"9'-5.5" 8'-9.5"

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:22 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

SECTIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A7.0
93 UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
327.00'
321.89'
320.29'
326.88'
2' - 0 1/2"
1' - 7"
3' - 0 1/2"
3' - 0"

EXISITNG GRADE

FINISHED SURFACE
4' - 0" 10' - 6"
14' - 6"

RAISED ROOF

ABOVE KITCHEN
341' - 6"
HEIGHT LIMIT 24' - 0"

DINING ROOM KITCHEN
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"

REFERENCE
353' - 0"
ROOF
348' - 0"
318.50' POOL BTM.
5' - 6"
1 POOL3
2 POOL3

EXISITNG GRADE

WATER LINE
4' - 0" 10' - 6"
14' - 6"

RAISED ROOF

ABOVE KITCHEN
341' - 6"

DINING ROOM KITCHEN
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
2ND FL CEILING
343' - 8 1/16"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
7 A8.0
8 A8.0 9
A8.1
2ND FL
333' - 2 1/16"
1ST FL
324' - 0"
11' - 0"
10' - 6" 9' - 2"
ROOF
348' - 0"
343.67'
345.67'
346.92'
21' - 8"
19' - 8"
24' - 0"
3' - 2" 1' - 0"
4' - 0"

HEIGHT LIMIT

EXISITNG GRADE

FINISHED SURFACE
9' - 2" 11' - 0"
20' - 2"
10' - 6" 10' - 6"
21' - 0"

PROPOSED GARDEN BERM PLANTER
GYM

GREAT ROOM ENTRY HALL

POOL CHANGING
ROOM BEDROOM SUITE 2

BEDROOM
BATH 3 SUITE 4
BATH 1
BEDROOM SUITE 1
BEDROOM SUITE 3
SUITE 4
CLOSET

CLOSET PANTRY KITCHEN BEYOND
8' - 6"
8" 5 1/2"
10' - 0" 8' - 6"
10' - 2"
9' - 6"
8' - 4"
9' - 8"
21' - 0"
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
LOWER 1ST FL
322' - 3 31/32"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
1ST FL
324' - 0"

WATER LINE WATER LINE
BAJA BTM. SPA BTM. 322.33'
2' - 7"
3' - 0"

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:34 PM
As indicated

SECTIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A7.1
94 2ND FL STAIRS
334' - 6"
2ND FL CEILING
343' - 8 1/16"
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
1ST FL
324' - 0"
3 F1
1 A7.0
21' - 8"

EXISITNG GRADE

FINISHED SURFACE
9' - 2" 10' - 6"
19' - 8"
HEIGHT LIMIT 24' - 0"

POCHED AREAS IN GREY DEMARK

INTERSECTED PLANE OF ROOF & FLOORS

ROOF IN BACKGROUND
344.93' 344.67'

GREAT ROOM
RAMP 6RAMP 3
-
---
-
---
-
---
21' - 0"
LOWER 2ND FL
331' - 10"
LOWER 2ND FL
ROOF
342' - 10"
LOWER 1ST FL
322' - 3 31/32"
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
LOWER 1ST FL

CEILING
330' - 10"
3 F1
1 A7.0
9' - 2" 11' - 0"

EXISITNG GRADE FINISHED SURFACE
11' - 0" 9' - 6"

RAISED ROOF

ABOVE KITCHEN
341' - 6"
HEIGHT LIMIT 24' - 0"

POCHED AREAS IN GREY DEMARK

CUT PLANE OF ROOF & FLOORS
20' - 2"
11' - 0"

ROOF IN BACKGROUND
20' - 6"
BEDROOM SUITE 3 BEDROOM SUITE 5BEDROOM SUITE 1 L1 ADU BATH ADU/BEDROOM L4
POOL
-
---
-
---
-
---
PARAPET WALL ROOF 1.5

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:37 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

SECTIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A8.0
95 UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
2 A7.0
3 A7.1
A21
3 3
F1
1 A7.0
ROOF
348' - 0"
10' - 6" 10' - 6"
HEIGHT LIMIT 24' - 0"
21' - 0"

GYM HALL

ENTRY HALL

KITCHEN
BEYOND
8' - 9"
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
ROOF
348' - 0"
1' - 3" 8' - 9" 0' - 8" 9' - 10"
24' - 0" HE GI HT LIM TI
13' - 10"
14' - 6"
10' - 0 1/2"
9' - 4 1/2"
9' - 5" 10' - 6"
BEDROOM SUITE 7GAME ROOM

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:38 PM
1/4" = 1'-0"

SECTIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A8.1
96 UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
LOWER 1ST FL

CEILING
330' - 10"
1ST FL
324' - 0"

DRIVEWAY
320' - 10"
ROOF
348' - 0"
10' - 6" 10' - 6" 3' - 0"
21' - 0"

ENTRANCE COURT

EXISTING GRADE
6 '
-
0 "
(N) 6' PROPERTY LINE

FENCE, HURRICANE
FENCE, TYP.
(N) LANDSCAPING

EXTERIOR WALL

COVERING IGNITION

RESISTANT MATERIAL
LOWER 2ND FL
331' - 10"
UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
LOWER 2ND FL
ROOF
342' - 10"
LOWER 1ST FL
322' - 3 31/32"
2ND FL
333' - 2 1/16"
ROOF
348' - 0"
9' - 6" 11' - 0" 5' - 2"
20' - 6"

EXISTING GRADE

GROUND LINE WEST OF GROUND LINE AT ELEVATION FACE

SWIMMING POOL
ROOF BEYOND AT HALLWAY.

SEE SECTION 2/A7.0
(N) 6' PROPERTY LINE

FENCE, HURRICANE
FENCE, TYP.
6 '
-
0 "

CHIMNEYS SHALL BE EQUIPPED

WITH AN APPROVED SPARK

ARRESTER

EXTERIOR WALL COVERING

IGNITION RESISTANT MATERIAL

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:31:53 PM
As indicated

EAST & WEST

ELEVATIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A9.0
97 UPPER 2ND FL
337' - 6"
LOWER 2ND FL
ROOF
342' - 10"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
ROOF
0' - 0" 348' - 0"10' - 6" 10' - 6" (E) 6' PROPERTY LINE FENCE 21' - 0" WEST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE, EXPANDED METAL 6' - 0".
(N) 6' PROPERTY LINE FENCE EAST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE, STYLE TBD (WILL BE VIEW PERMEABLE) (N) 6' TALL DRIVEWAY GATE, 20' WIDE, MOTORIZED, DOUBLE SWING. STYLE TBD (WILL BE VIEW PERMEABLE)

DRIVEWAY
LOWER 2ND FL
331' - 10"
LOWER 2ND FL
ROOF
342' - 10"
LOWER 1ST FL
322' - 3 31/32"
UPPER 1ST FL
327' - 0"
ROOF
348' - 0"
5' - 2" 11' - 0" 9' - 6"
20' - 6"
(N) 6' PROPERTY

LINE FENCE,

HURRICANE FENCE
6' - 0"
(E) TENNIS

COURT FENCE
BEYOND

TRELLIS

SITTING AREA
BEYOND
WEST

PROPERTY

LINE FENCE
BEYOND

EXTERIOR WALL COVERING

IGNITION RESISTANT
MATERIAL, TYP.

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:32:03 PM
As indicated

NORTH & SOUTH

ELEVATIONS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
A9.1
98 $5&+,7(&7
2:1(5
-7'$5&+,7(&76
-$1(.'20%52:$
1723$1*$&$1<21%/9'
723$1*$&$


7(/)$;
'20%52:$#-7'$5&+,7(&76&20
6758&785$/(1*,1((5(/(&75,&$/(1*,1((5
352-(&76+((77,7/($5&+,7(&7'(6,*1(5
-$1(.7$%(1&.,'20%52:$$,$
5(9,6,216
6&$/(352-(&7180%(5'5$:1%<6+((7180%(5
3/277(''$7(
7KLVGUDZLQJLVWKH
SURSHUW\RI-7'$UFKLWHFWV
DQGLWLVQRWWREH
UHSURGXFHGRUFRSLHGLQ
ZKROHRUSDUW,WLVQRWWR
EHXVHGLQDQ\ZD\ZLWKRXW
ZULWWHQSHUPLVVLRQIURP
-7'DUFKLWHFWV
0(&+$1,&$/(1*,1((5+,6725,&&2168/7$17
0$/,%2//&FR0,&+(/%2/285
:,/6+,5(%/9'68,7(
/26$1*(/(6&$

7(/

30
)($6,%,/,7<
3/$1
%2/285)$0,/<5(6,'(1&(

&87+%(575'0$/,%8&$


$31



$XWKRU
$
)($6$%,/,7<3/$1
99 DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM

WATER COURSE PER MEETINGS

WITH DAVE CRAWFORD
POOL

UNENCLOSED & OPEN TO THE SKY

AREA FOR VIEWING TENNIS
(GROUND SURFACE PERMEABLE).
(E) SERVICE CROSSING
(E) WATER COURSE
(N) ACCESS DRIVEWAY TO GARAGE

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK

SETBACK
(E) TENNIS COURT TO BE
REPAIRED SURFACE RESTORED.
(E) LIGHT STANDARDS TO BE

REPAINTED & FIXTURES
RELAMPED.

KITCHEN SERVICE ENTRANCE

CONCRETE SLAB

FIRE DEPARTMENT

TURNAROUND

FIGURE B (OPPOSITE)

F PARALLEL

GRID LINE H

PRIVATE DRIVEWAY

LOADING AREA
APN: 4469-041-011
BLDG. OUTLINE AT LEVEL 1
BLDG. OUTLINE AT LEVEL 2
SPA
BAJA

SETBACK
S
E
T
BAC
K
315.01' 316.02' 317.03' 317.99' 319.11' 320.11' 321.11' 322.11' 323.11' 325.05'
326.08'
327.09'
328.09'
329.09'
330.10'
331.10'
332.09'
(N) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
(E) TENNIS COURT
7125 SF

IMPERMEABLE
513.84' PL
2 0
0 .
7 6
'
P
L
428.23' PL
187.
52'
PL

ENTRANCE
COURT
(N) DRIVEWAY GATE TO BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE REQUIRED LACFD MINUMUM CLEAREANCE (20'). (E) NORTH PL GATE & FENCE WEST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE (E) WEST, EAST & SOUTH PL FENCE TO REMAIN, NO CHANGE
20' - 0" 30' - 0"
33' - 6"
46'
23'
37'
81'
37'
46'
8 8
'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CA; LOT 15, BLOCK 2FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES:1 - FIRE DEPARTMENT TURNAROUND PER LA COUNTY ARE LESS THAN 2%.2 - DRIVEWAY SLOPES ARE LESS THAN 20%.3 - FD ACCESS ROAD SURFACE: ALL PERMEABLE PORTIONS ACCESSIBLE TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ACCOMODATE FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT LOADS.4 - CHIMNEYS: ALL CHIMNEYS OR FIREPLACES THAT BURN SOLID FUEL SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN APPROVED SPARK ARRESTER. BUILDING CODE 2802.1.5 - BRUSH CLEARANCE: CLEARANCE OF BRUSH AND VEGETATIVE GROWTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED PER FIRE CODE 325.6 - UNDERSIDE OF APPENDAGES: CANTILEVERED AND OVERHANGING APPENDAGES AND FLOOR PROJECTIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL OR MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF SFM 12- 7A-3 (RESIDENTIAL CODE R3217.7.7 AND BUILDING CODE 707.A.7). 7 - DECKING: DECKING, SURFACES, STAIR TREADS, RISERS, AND LANDINGS OF DECKS, PORCHES, AND BALCONIES WHERE ANY PORTION OF SUCH SUFRACE IS WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:

A. IGNITION RESISTANT MATERIAL AND MEET SFM 12-7A-4AND SFM 12-7A-5 OR 8 - EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES: EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING:

A. THE EXTERIOR SURFACE OR CLADDING SHALL BE OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR IGNITION-RESISTANT MATERIAL. 9 - EXTERIOR WALL COVERING:ALL EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 1” PLASTER OR 1” MORTAR BED WITH CERAMIC TILES. .1011 - ROOF COVERINGS: ALL ROOF COVERINGS SHALL BE CLASS "A" AS SPECIFIED IN BUILDING CODE 1505.1.1 (RESIDENTIAL CODE R327.5.2 & R902)12 - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: PROVIDE APPROVED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FIRE CODE 903.3.1.3 - NFPA 13D, IN RESIDENCE AND GARAGE.13 - ELEVATORS: ELEVATORS, ESCALATORS AND MOVING WALKS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 30. 14 - SHAFT ENCLOSURE OPENINGS: OPENINGS THROUGH A FLOOR / CEILING ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PROTECTED BY A SHAFT ENCLOSURE OF FIRE-RESISTIVE CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY BUILDING CODE SECTION 708. BUILDING CODE 708.2. 15 - FIRE BARRIER SEPARATION: PROVIDE A ONE (1) HOUR FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND RESIDENCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 508 AND TABLE 508.4.

BLDG. CODE 508.4.4. OPENINGS IN FIRE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MIN. 20 MIN. RATING, BE SELF-CLOSING, SELF-LATCHING, TIGHT FITTING & SMOKE SEALED 16- FIRE FLOW: THE REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AT THIS LOCATION IS 1,250 AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL PRESSURE, FOR A DURATION OF ONE (1) HOUR OVER AND ABOVE MAXIMUM DAILY DOMESTIC DEMAND.
17- FIRE HYDRANTS: ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL MEASURE 6" x 4" x 2-1/2", BRASS OR BRONZE, CONFORMING TO AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION STANDARD C503, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
18-ROOF GUTTERS: ALL ROOF DRAINS TO BE PROVIDED WITH CODE REQUIRED OVERFLOW DRAINS AND DEBRIS GUARD)19- EXTERIOR GLAZING AND WINDOW WALLS: EXTERIOR WINDOWS, WINDOW WALLS, GLAZED DOORS, AND GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A. MULTI-PANE GLAZING UNITS WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE OR B. GLASS BLOCK UNITS OR C. HAVE A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 20 MINUTES, WHEN TESTED ACCORDING TO NFPA 257 OR D. MEET THE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF SFM 12-7A-2 (RESIDENTIAL CODE R327.8.2.1 AND BUILDING CODE 708A.2.1) OCCUPANCY R3 + UCONSTRUCTION TYPE VBFULLY SPRINKLED NFPA 13D(2) STORIES:LEVEL 1 5535 SFLEVEL 2 2856 SF 8391 SF
107'
FIRE DEPARTMENT 5' WIDE OPEN TO SKY ACCESS PATH WITH MAX SLOPE OF 20% AND STAIRS WHERE REQUIRED.

FIRE HYDRANT
(N) TENNIS CT TOILET

ROOM & SHOWER
FIRE DEPARTMENT 5' WIDE OPEN TO

SKY ACCESS PATH WITH MAX SLOPE OF
20% AND STAIRS WHERE REQUIRED.
19' 70' 230'
1250
1250
250
1500
15% 1% 12% 2% 13% 5% 12%
8%

PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS

PERMEABLE GARDEN
SITTING AREA 1

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 3

PERMEABLE

GARDEN SITTING
AREA 4

STAIRS ON GRADE
(6" RISERS 12" TREADS)
*ALL PERMEABLE PORTIONS ACCESSIBLE TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ACCOMODATE FIRE DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT LOADS PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREAS*

DRIVEWAY CURB
WITH TWO 8%

TRANSITIONS
2% 2%
2%
(N) FENCE 290 LF (VIEW PERMEABLE)

TWO MOBILE BASKETBALL HOOPS

TENNIS COURT NET AND REMOVABLE END POLES

ENTRANCE/EXIT
(N) NORTH PL GATE & FENCE EAST OF BLUE LINE WATER COURSE TO BE REPLACED

CHIMNEY W/ SPARK
ARRESTER (SEE F.D. NOTE 4)
DECKING WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE

PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHALL
COMPLY WITH F.D. NOTE 7
145'

TO NEAREST

HYDRAN FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTES T
FD 5' FT WIDE ACCESS PATH
136'
1 0
'
-
0 "

ELEVATORS SHALL

COMPLY WITH THE

REQUIREMENTS

SET FORTH IN

BUILDING CODE
CHAPTER 30.

BUILDING SHALL HAVE 1 HR. FIRE
SEPARATION BETWEEN (R3- U1) THAT

INCLUDES FLOOR, WALL AND CEILING AREAS
29738 CUTHBERT RD
LOWER 1ST FL

CEILING
330' - 10"
1ST FL
324' - 0"
339.41'
338.00'
331.92'
329.65'
326.42' 326.75'
323.33' 323.61'

EXISITNG GRADE

FINISHED SURFACE
317.11'

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
3/5/2024 2:58:55 PM
Date 1
As indicated

WATER &
ACCESS

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
F1
1 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

FIRE DEPARTMENT

FIRE PREVENTION ENGINEERING

APPROVED

ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ONLY
By__________________________
Fire Prevention Engineer
Date________________________ 03/18/2024
Q
________ _ __________
re Prevention Enginee
Q

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

FIRE DEPARTMENT

FIRE PREVENTION ENGINEERING

APPROVED

FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION ONLY
By________________________
Fire Prevention Engineer
Date______________________
_________________
e Prevention Enginee
______________
03/18/2024
To schedule an inspection, please [email protected] at least one set of the approvedplans to them prior to the inspection.

FEPC2022-1378 FEPC2022-1378
100
REVISED:

PLANTS AND TREES WERE REMOVED TO MAKE A VIEW CORRIDOR TO THE OCEAN FOR PUBLIC BENEFIT .NO CHANGE TO THE REST OF THE APPROVED PLAN 101
L-0.0 - COVER SHEET
L-1.1 - HYDROZONE PLANL-1.2 - FUEL MODIFICATION PLANL-2.1 - IRRIGATION PLANL-2.2 - IRRIGATION DETAILS AND NOTESL-3.1 - PLANTING PLANL-3.2 - PLANTING DETAILS AND NOTESL-4.1 - TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONSL-4.2 - IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONSL-4.3 - LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONSL-4.4 - LANDSCAPE & MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS Bolour Residence
29738 Cuthbert Road
Malibu, California 90290
Assessor's ID No.

LANDSCAPE EFFICIENCY PLAN

SHEET INDEX

PROJECT
SITE
NORTH
L-0.0

COVER SHEET

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

INDEX MAP
N.T.S.

NORTH

PROJECT
SITE
"I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE

WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT
A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE"

MWELO COMPLIANCE
APN: 4469-041-011
LOT AREA: 88,656 S.F.

REVISIONS BY
DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDDATESCALEJOB NO.

SHEET
Bolour Residence
29738 CUTHBERT ROAD
MALIBU, CALIFORNIA 92605
RM/ECG
ECG
RM/ECG

AS NOTED
21-1280

DRAWING
Troller Mayer Associates, Inc.

Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design
1403 Kenneth Road, Suite B
Glendale, CA 91201-1421
P 818-956-8101 F 818-956-0120
03-05-2024
102
UP
(E) WATER COURSE

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK

SETBACK
PL
PL
PL
PL

SETBACK
POOL
(E) FOOTPRINT(PRE-FIRE)
BAJA
(E) TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT
SPA

DRIVEWAY

SEATING AND VIEWING
(TRELLIS B AREA)

HYDROZONE LEGEND

HYDROZONE (A) - DRIP / SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER / LOW WATER USEHYDROZONE (B) - DRIP / SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER / LOW & MODERATE WATER USEHYDROZONE (C) - DRIP / SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER / MODERATE WATER USEHYDROZONE (D) - BUBBLER / TREES / LOW WATER USEHYDROZONE (E) - BUBBLER / SHRUBS / MODERATE WATER USE L-1.1

HYDROZONE PLAN

REVISIONS BY
DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDDATESCALEJOB NO.

SHEET
Bolour Residence
29738 CUTHBERT ROAD
MALIBU, CALIFORNIA 92605
RM/ECG
ECG
RM/ECG

AS NOTED
21-1280

DRAWING
Troller Mayer Associates, Inc.

Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design
1403 Kenneth Road, Suite B
Glendale, CA 91201-1421
P 818-956-8101 F 818-956-0120
03-05-2024
"I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE

WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT
A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE"
103
  

UP
(E) WATER COURSE

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK

SETBACK
PL
PL
PL
PL

SETBACK
POOL
(E) FOOTPRINT(PRE-FIRE)
BAJA
(E) TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT
SPA

DRIVEWAY

SEATING AND VIEWING
(TRELLIS B AREA)

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

4. ALL UNSIZED RUNS OF LATERAL LINE
PIPE SERVING THREE OR FEWER SPRAY HEADS SHALL BE SIZED 3/4".ALL LATERAL LINE PIPE DOWNSTREAM SHOWN. SEE ADJACENT SIZING CHARTSIZING WHERE SYMBOLS ARE NOTCONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE PIPEON THIS SHEET FOR GPM OF DISTRIBUTIONREFER TO IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LEGENDOF A 3/4" SIZED PIPE IS ALSO 3/4". 
HEADS.

3.2.1. PVC
2"
1 1/2 "1 1/4 "
1"
36-55
27-3517-2611-16
SYMBOL

GPM
3/4 " 0-10

ADDRESS:
29738 CUTHBERT ROAD
MALIBU, CA 92605
WATER PURVEYOR:

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

WATERWORKS
23533 W. CIVIC CENTER WAY
MALIBU, CA 90265PH.# 310-317-1389
EXISTING METER SIZE:

STATIC WATER PRESSURE:

MAXIMUM SYSTEM DEMAND:
1"
75 PSI
LANDSCAPE AREA: 4,566 SF

3.87 GPM
L-2.1

IRRIGATION PLAN

REVISIONS BY
DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDDATESCALEJOB NO.

SHEET
Bolour Residence
29738 CUTHBERT ROAD
MALIBU, CALIFORNIA 92605
RM/ECG
ECG
RM/ECG

AS NOTED
21-1280

DRAWING
Troller Mayer Associates, Inc.

Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design
1403 Kenneth Road, Suite B
Glendale, CA 91201-1421
P 818-956-8101 F 818-956-0120
03-05-2024
"I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE

WATER EFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE AND SUBMIT
A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE"
104

GROUNDCOVER LEGEND
Symbol Description
Mulch
3/4" Washed Crushed Gravel - Color Copper Canyon Avail. from Southwest Boulder Install Permaloc edge around all sides of gravel areas.

TREE LEGEND
Symbol Genus Species Name Common Name Container Size Quantity WUCOLS Fuel Modification Zone Prunus ilicifolia ssp.
lyonii Catalina Cherry 24" Box MULTI 3 Low A, B
UP
(E) WATER COURSE

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK

SETBACK
PL
PL
PL
PL

SETBACK
POOL
(E) FOOTPRINT(PRE-FIRE)
BAJA
(E) TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURT
SPA

DRIVEWAY

SEATING AND VIEWING
(TRELLIS B AREA)
SHRUB LEGENDSymbol Genus Species Name Common Name Container Size Spacing WUCOLS Fuel Modification Zone Aeonium canariense Giant Velvet Rose 1 Gallon 30" O.C. Low Agave demetiana
'Variegata'
Variegated
Smooth Agave 5 Gallon 30" O.C. Very Low
Aloe arborescens Torch Aloe 5 Gallon 30" O.C. Low
Lantana 'Alba' White Trailing Lantana 5 Gallon 36" O.C. LowLavandula denata candicans
Gray Leaved
FrenchLavender
5 gallon 60" O.C. Low

A, BA, B
B
AA

SHRUB LEGEND
Symbol Genus Species Name Common Name Container Size Spacing WUCOLS Fuel Modification Zone Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 Gallon 48" O.C. Low Phlomis fruitcosa Jeruselum Sage 5 Gallon 36" O.C. Low
Podocarpus gracillor African Fern Pine 15 Gallon 60" O.C. MedRosa Cecile Brunner Cecile Brunner Rose 15 Gallon 15 Gallon
AS
SHOWN Med
Rosa Julia Childs Julia Childs Rose 36" O.C. Med
Rosa californica California Wild Rose 5 Gallon 36" O.C. Low B
A, BA
BBB
L-3.1

PLANTING PLAN

REVISIONS BY
DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKEDDATESCALEJOB NO.

SHEET
Bolour Residence
29738 CUTHBERT ROAD
MALIBU, CALIFORNIA 92605
RM/ECG
ECG
RM/ECG

AS NOTED
21-1280

DRAWING
Troller Mayer Associates, Inc.

Landscape Architecture Planning Urban Design
1403 Kenneth Road, Suite B
Glendale, CA 91201-1421
P 818-956-8101 F 818-956-0120
03-05-2024

1. Before the demolition or start of construction, the Contractor shall contact the Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer and Client Representative to schedule a pre-construction meeting. During this meeting, all site conditions and Construction Documents shall be reviewed. All existing trees shall be preserved. Failure to call for said meeting implies acceptance by the Contractor of trees to be preserved in their existing condition as well as any liability for removing trees that are designated "Protect in Place".

2. Landscape Contractor shall procure and reserve plant material at start of contract to ensure availability and quality.

3. Before the demolition and removal of ANY landscape material refer to the Civil Engineer 'Demolition Plan' and Tree Protection Notes specs 01532

4. Plants are shown diagrammatically on plan therefore plant spacing in Planting Legend takes precedence to plants shown on the plan.

Contractor is to calculate quantity of plants called for and install all that are shown on plan at the spacing in the legend.5. Nursery images of all trees, shrubs and groundcover shall be submitted as part of the Landscape Submittal as required by the LandscapeSpecifications 02900. Images shall be submitted to the Landscape Architect for approval prior to planting see Landscape Specifications 02900. Images shall include height of plant and width. Submittal must be submitted (3) three weeks prior to any landscape or irrigation workcommences.6. All Landscape Planting, Irrigation and Paving damaged by contractor shall be repaired and approved by Client before 100% completion ofconstruction at no additional cost to the Client.

7. Finish grade shall be 2" below all walks/curbs for areas to receive shrub and/or groundcover and mulch.8. In order to achieve a smooth, even finish grade, additional soil may need to be added to the planting areas. Refer the the Landscape Specifications for additional information on imported soil.9. All trenches, holes, and divots from construction work in areas of existing turf/shrub areas to remain shall be patch/repaired and re-seeded/re-mulched. Infill soil shall be installed to all trenches, holes and divots as to re-establish uniform finish grade. Soil shall be compacted to 85% prior to re-seeding/re-mulching. See Landscape Specifications 02900 for further info.

10. Finish grade shall slope 2% away from structures and towards swales (when applicable)11. Forest Floor Mulch shall be a 3" thick layer and shall be spread beneath and in between all new and existing shrubs, groundcover and trees within the scope of work so as to leave soil completely covered with mulch. Samples of the mulch shall be a part of the Landscape Submittal to the Landscape Architect. Mulch type shall be per the landscape specifications.

12. Water Percolation -- Contractor to dig a test planting pit, 3'-0" square and 3'-0" deep; fill pit with water up to 2'-0" from bottom and mark location and check level in 24 hours. If standing water is present, Contractor to contact Owner Representative and Landscape Architect and it will be determined if a sump pump must be implemented.

13. Conduct two (2) soil tests per each of the ftwo (2) soil test locations marked on the Planting Plan with the symbol:
for a total of four (4) soil tests. The first two (2) tests on site shall be conducted after rough grading is complete and the second two (2) tests before planting commences, but after irrigation installment and soil amendments have been applied. These tests are to determine recommended amounts of fertilizer and harmful substances, if any. See specifications for soil testing information of existing and imported soil.

14. During soil preparation amend with Gypsum (Agricultural Calcium Sulfate Ca SO4) per amount recommended by the soil test results. See specifications for further information.

15. All new and existing planting areas shall be free of construction debris, rocks, form boards, weeds etc. See Landscape Specifications 02900.

16. Complete Roundup Herbicide weed abatement (weed and kill process for 8 weeks) in areas of re-grading and turf removal per Sect. 02900, Art.3.03B. Verify in the field, with Owner Representative, all areas to receive Roundup before its application. Do not use Roundup in areas where existing landscaping and turf are to remain.

17. Install Jute Mesh for slopes greater than 4:1 slope.

PLANTING NOTES
"I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE

REQUIREMENTS OF THE WATEREFFICIENCY LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE

AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE
DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE"

ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND GRONDCOVERARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH DROUGHT TOLERANT LANDSCAPE (DTL).

SOIL TEST

LOCATION

SOIL TEST

LOCATION
105
187'
-
6 "
513' - 10"
2 0
0 '
-
9 "
428' - 3"
AB
C ED
Pentair - #60212210" outside diameter x 2 1/2" depth26 watt5G color LEDColor-changingStainless steel face ring120 V 0' 10' 30' 50' 100
POOL
BAJA

SEATING AND VIEWING(TRELLIS B AREA)
100' MALIBU/COASTAL COMMISSION DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE (E) FOOTPRINT(PRE-FIRE)

VEGETABLE AND HERB GARDEN
SPA

DRIVEWAY

DECORATIVE
GARDEN

TRELLIS A
POST
D
E
F
D
E
(E) TENNIS AND BASKETBALL COURTWITH (E) LIGHT STANDARDS

NEW LIGHTING

SETBACK

SETBACK

SETBACK
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
Elite - #LB201LED tape light is offered with a 100W 12V driver(LB100-DC-12V-100-120) that can power one run at 16’ (5m)<4.4 watt/ft98 lumen/ft outputForward Voltage Drop: 1.92-2.2 V LED color changing RGB tape light controller has 11 different modes and can be controlled via a remote control devicePart number LB101 ControllerWAC - #3011-30BZ3" high x 1 5/8" wide2.8 watt60 lumen light output3000K color temperatureIP66 rated, protected against powerful water jets6' lead wire includedTranslucent lens provides for uniform diffused light outputSolid diecast brass or corrosion resistant aluminum alloyADA compliantMaitains constant lumen output against voltage dropBronze finishUL 1838 listed F
Elite - #RL475 Downlight on Front Door Overhang4" round505 lumen light output3000K color temperatureSatin nickel finish3-step MacAdam ellipse color qualitySluminum die-cast body and trim constructionRound flat lens trimDimtr (triac) dimming16W high voltage inverter (remote)L70 at 50000 hour lifetime LUMUX - #SLS6504 1/2" high x 10 1/8" wide x 3" depth10 watt630 lumen light outpit3000K color temperatutr120/177 voltageIncandescent T10Compact flourescent LEDClass P, electronic ballastBronze finishFrosted glass diffuserLUMUX - #BL35539 1/2" high x 6 1/4" wide x 8 1/2" depth17 watt LED720 lumen light output3000K color temperature120/277 voltageBronze finishFrosted glass diffuser

TRELLIS BEAM
C
B
B
C
C
D
C
OWNER MICHAEL BOLOUR SITE ADDRESS 29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA ZIP CODE 90265ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. (APN) 4469-041-011LOT AREA 88,656 ± S.F. (ACERS 2.04)MMC ZONING DESIGNATION RR2GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALWATER SUPPLY TYPE, HOME & IRRIGATION CITY WATER SUPPLYTOTAL IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE AREA 14,100 SFLANDSCAPE TYPES:

OVERHEAD SPRAY AREA 6600 SFDRIP IRRIGATION AREA 7500 SFHARDSCAPE/IMPERMEABLE AREA 25,200 SF (N) OPEN PLAY AREA

BUFFALO GRASS
(BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES)
3450 SF
EXISITNG TENNIS COURT IN SOUTHWEST CORNER SURVIVED THE WOOSLEY FIREINCLUDING EXISITING LIGHT STANDARDS. EXISITNG TO REMAIN.

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 5:00:04 PM
Date 1
1/16" = 1'-0"

LIGHTING

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
LT1
106
(E) WATER
COURSE

BLUE LINE STREAM

SETBACK
PL

SETBACK
0' 10' 30' 50' 100
100' MALIBU/COASTAL COMMISSION DESIGNATED OFFSET FROM WATER COURSE

CUTHBERT
RD

EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE REMOVEDEXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN

TREES & SHRUBS NON-NATIVE
(ORIMENTAL SPECIES)

TREES & SHRUBS NON-NATIVE
(ORIMENTAL SPECIES)

EXISTING TO REMAIN

EXISTING TO REMAIN

EXISTING TO REMAIN

EXISTING TO REMAIN
E
X
IS
T
I
N
G TO
R
E
M
A
IN

LANDSCAPE DEMO PLAN
1324587
12 BERMUDA PALM TREES 12"
1 1 1 1 1
11 1
1 1 1
1 3 BIRDS OF PARADISE ~7' FT TALL
2 2
7 PEPPER TREES 20-48"
3 3
3 3 3
3 2 SPRUCE TREES 18-20"1 FIG TREE
5 4 4
1 CYPRESS TREE
7 3
1 WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA
9 9 1 YUCCA
- NO NATIVE PROTECTED TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL.
10 8
7 OLEANDER BUSHES ~8' FT TALL
11 1 FICUS BENJAMINA ~ 10' FT TALL
9 2
11 10
1010
10 10 10 10
GENERAL NOTES A. CONTRACTOR OF PARTY PERFORMING DEMOLITION MUST FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MALIBU ORDINANCES & NUISANCE ABATEMENT PROTOCOLS.

B. ALL WORK ON THE SITE SHALL BE IN STRICT CONFORMANCE WITH OSHA GUIDELINES & PROCEDURES.C. ALL DEMOLITION & ALL RELATED ACTIVITY MUST OBSERVE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION REGULATIONS & APPLICABLE CEQA GUIDELINES & REGULATIONS.

D. A GRADING PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO INITIATION OF ANY DEMOLITION.E. PRIOR TO ANY WORK A PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST SHALL OBSERVE & APPROVE EXCAVATION BOTTOMS. A PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER/GEOLOGIST SHALL OBSERVE, APPROVE & PREPARE AN OBSERVATION FORM FOR CITY GRADING INSPECTOR & PROJECT RECORD.

F. ALL BACKFILLING & PLACEMENT SHALL BE IN STRICT CONFORMATION WITH APPROVED PROJECT SOILS REPORT.1.0 - GENERAL - ALL WORK SHALL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE IBC, CBC, CRC, NEC, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, APPLICABLE NFPA CODES, ALL CITY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE OSHA GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS.1.1 - THE WORD "CONTRACTOR" MEANS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND, WHERE APPLICABLE BY TRADE, SUBCONTRACTORS. -CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING ALL NOTES PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT.
-ALL CONSTRUCTION AND DETAILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL WORKS, DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT ARE ALSO TO BE ADVISED REGARDING ANY DISCREPANCIES IN MEASUREMENT, DIMENSION, LOCATION OR DETAILS PRIOR TO CONTRACTOR'S PROCEEDING WITH THAT PORTION OF THE WORK. -WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL PREVAIL OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS ON DRAWINGS. IN NO EVENT IS A DIMENSION TO BE SCALED OFF THE DRAWINGS WITHOUT FIRST ADVISING THE ARCHITECT. -PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONTRACT PRICES, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND COORDINATING ALL NOTES AND DRAWINGS TO INCLUDE ANY SUBCONTRACTOR'S SHEETS OR NOTES, BUT WHICH ARE INDICATED ELSEWHERE IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. -DETAILS ARE INTENDED TO SHOW FINAL EFFECT OF PARTS OF CONSTRUCTION. MINOR MODIFICATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUIT PARTICULAR JOB SITE DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS AND SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE WORK. ANY MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED ARE TO BE FIRST REVIEWED AND CONFIRMED WITH THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

1.2 - CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL ITEMS NOTED "VERIFY OR CONFIRM WITH OWNER OR ARCHITECT" WHICH MIGHT AFFECT COSTS PRIOR TO FINALIZING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND SUBCONTRACTS, AND SHALL CONFIRM DECISIONS REGARDING SELECTION, MATERIALS, COLOR, FINISH OR OTHER SPECIFICATIONS NOT YET DECIDED REGARDING THESE ITEMS. -CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE THE COST OF THESE ITEMS WITHIN THE FINAL CONTRACT PRICE.-UNLESS ITEMS ARE SPECIFICALLY ITEMIZED AS NOT INCLUDED IN CONTRACT (NIC), THEY WILL BE ASSUMED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE.
-ALL ALLOWANCE ITEMS SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFIED AS ALLOWANCES AND INCLUDED IN THE ESTIMATE OR CONTRACT PRICE.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY EXTRA COSTS ARISING FROM THE EXECUTION OF HIS CONTRACT OR SUBCONTRACTS AND SHALL RECEIVE OWNER'S WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR SAME. -CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING THAT ALL GENERAL AND SUBCONTRACT WORK IS BEING ACCOMPLISHED ACCORDING TO THE MOST CURRENT CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING REVISIONS. -UNLESS OTHER ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE, OWNER SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE PROPERTY AND LIABILITY INSURANCE IN ADDITION TO CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE TO COVER ALL NEW WORK. THIS INSURANCE SHALL INCLUDE THE INTERESTS OF THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR IN THE WORK, BUT SHALL NOT RELIEVE CONTRACTOR OF HIS RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER CONTRACT OR AS ITEMIZED ABOVE.

1.3 - CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PREMISES SECURE, CLEAN, AND HAZARD FREE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING HIS EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND WORK IN NEAT, CLEAN, ORDERLY AND SAFE CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.1.4 - CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION AS NECESSARY TO INSTALL NEW WORK, AND REMOVE ALL EXCESS DEBRIS AND MATERIALS, NOT REQUIRED BY CONSTRUCTION OR REQUESTED BY OWNER. -TEMPORARY ERECTION BRACING, GUYS, ETC. INSTALLATION DESIGN AND REMOVAL ARE THE COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT AND MAINTAIN TEMPORARY BARRICADES AND DUST-PROOF PARTITIONS AS NEEDED FOR PROTECTION AGAINST ACCIDENT, AND SHALL CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF HIS WORK AND THE OWNER'S PROPERTY FROM DAMAGE OR LOSS ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION.

1.5 - CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY TOILET FACILITIES ON THE JOB SITE IF NECESSARY OR REQUIRED BY LOCAL CODE. -CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ARRANGEMENTS FOR ANY TEMPORARY POWER AND TELEPHONE SERVICE WITH THE OWNER PRIOR TO START OF THE CONSTRUCTION.
-CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY UTILITIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO POWER, WATER, PHONE, SANITATION ETC. ALL TEMP. UTILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS.

1.6 - ALL GLAZING SHALL HAVE A TEMPORARY LABEL ON THE PRODUCT UNTIL INSPECTED BY THE CITY FIELD INSPECTOR. -ALL GLAZING IN HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS SHALL BE TEMPERED INCLUDING SLIDING GLASS DOORS, BATHROOM WINDOWS IN TUB ENCLOSURES, SHOWER ENCLOSURES, AND GLAZING WITHIN 24" OF DOORS, 18" OF FLOOR.

ARCHITECTOWNER

JTD ARCHITECTS

JANEK DOMBROWA
1111 N. TOPANGA CANYON BLVD.

TOPANGA CA 90290
310.842.7616 TEL .3836 FAX
[email protected]

STRUCTURAL ENGINEERELECTRICAL ENGINEER

PROJECTSHEET TITLEARCHITECT/DESIGNER

JANEK TABENCKI DOMBROWA, AIA

REVISIONS

SCALEPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYSHEET NUMBER

PLOTTED DATE
This drawing is the
property of JTD Architects
and it is not to be
reproduced or copied in
whole or part. It is not to
be used in anyway without
written permission from
JTD architects.

MECHANICAL ENGINEER HISTORIC CONSULTANT
MALIBO LLC, c/o MICHEL BOLOUR
12301 WILSHIRE BLVD. SUITE 403
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025
TEL 310.826.2838
5/22/2024 6:32:18 PM
1/16" = 1'-0"

LANDSCAPE

DEMO PLAN

BOLOUR FAMILY RESIDENCE
29738 CUTHBERT RD, MALIBU, CA 90265
(APN: 4469-041-011)
Author
L5.1
107

LANDSCAPE DEMO PLAN EXPANDED
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC/ JOGGING/ DOG WALKING ETC.

PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC/ JOGGING/ DOG WALKING ETC.

REMOVAL OF EXISTING ORNAMENTAL FOLIAGE = PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ENHANCED BY INCREASED VIEW CORRIDOR ITEM 1
ENHANCE THE CUTHBERT ROAD PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE BY WIDENING THE VISUAL ROAD CORRIDOR - LARGE EXISTING LANDSCAPING SCREEN WILL BE REMOVED – SEE ITEM 1 108

OPEN SPACE & PUBLIC VIEW CORRIDORS
PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC/ JOGGING/ DOG WALKING ETC.

PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC/ JOGGING/ DOG WALKING ETC.

SPATIAL CORRIDOR THROUGH PROPERTY

OCEAN VIEW

SPATIAL CORRIDOR THROUGH PROPERTY
ITEM 2
ITEM 3
ITEM 3
ITEM 3
THE SPATIAL AND VISUAL OPENING WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY A FORE GARDEN VISIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS ON CUTHBERT ROAD – SEE ITEM 2CREATE PERMEABILITY WITH OCEAN VIEW CORRIDORS TO ALLOW PUBLIC VIEW OF THE OCEAN HORIZON – SEE ITEM 3 109

BIOLOGY REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4804 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:

TO: City of Malibu Biologist
City of Malibu Planning Department REVISED DATE04/08/2024 JOB ADDRESS: 29738 CUTHBERT RD
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Janek Dombrowa, JTD Architects
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1111 N Topanga Canyon Blvd.

APPLICANT PHONE #: (213) 470-2723
APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition to the new house, landscape, pool and OWTS. The project scope has not changed from
what was previously withdrawn CDP.

Topanga, CA 90290
PROJECT NUMBER: CDPWF 23-004
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City Biologist, Courtney McCammon
PLANNER: Aakash Shah
TO:

The project review package is INCOMPLETE and; CANNOT proceed through Final Planning Review until corrections and conditions from Biological Review are incorporated into the proposed project design
(See Attached).

The project is APPROVED, consistent with City Goals & Policies associated with the protection of biological resources and CAN proceed through the Planning process.

The project may have the potential to significantly impact the following resources, either individually or cumulatively: Sensitive Species or Habitat, Watersheds, and/or Shoreline Resources and therefore Requires Review by the Environmental Review Board (ERB).

Signature Date
Additional requirements/conditions may be imposed upon review of plan revision Contact Information:

Courtney McCammon, City Biologist, [email protected], (310) 456-2489, extension 277 Rev 05/29/2018
X
4/16/24
ATTACHMENT 2
110
City of Malibu
Biology ● Planning Department
23825 Stuart Ranch Road · Malibu, California · 90265-4861 Phone (310) 456-2489 · Fax (310) 456-3356 · www.malibucity.org

Recycled Paper

BIOLOGY REVIEW SHEET

PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant:
(name and email)
Janek Dombrowa
[email protected]
Project Address: 29738 CUTHBERT RD
Malibu, CA 90265
Planning Case No.: CDPWF 23-004
Project Description: Addition to the new house, landscape, pool and OWTS. The project scope has not changed from
what was previously withdrawn CDP.

Date of Review: April 16, 2024
Reviewer:

Courtney McCammon Signature:

Contact Information: Phone: (310) 456-2489 ext 277 Email: [email protected]

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Site Plan: 10/26/23
Site Survey: 10/26/23
Landscape Plan: 4/8/24
Hydrozone Plan: 4/8/24
Irrigation Plan: 4/8/24
Fuel Modification Plan: 4/8/24
Grading Plan: 10/26/23
OWTS Plan: 10/26/23
Bio Assessment:

Bio Inventory:

Native Tree Survey:

Native Tree Protection
Plan:

Miscellaneous:

Previous Reviews: Incomplete (11/5/23)

REVIEW FINDINGS
Review Status: INCOMPLETE: Additional information and/or a response to the listed review comments is required.

APPROVED: The project has been approved with regards to biological impacts.

CANNNOT APPROVE AS SUBMITTED: The proposed project does not conform to the requirements of the MMC and/or LCP.

ERB: This project has the potential to impact ESHA and may require review by the Environmental Review Board pursuant to LIP Section 4.4.4 111
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDPWF 23-004
29738 Cuthbert Road
April 16, 2024

DISCUSSION:

1. The Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) for this project totals 56,307 gallons per year (gpy). The Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) totals 53,119 gpy. Therefore, the project meets the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance Requirements.

2. The Senior Planning staff have determined that no new development is occurring within the stream or the 100-foot stream buffer, and determined a biological inventory is not required at this time.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. The project is recommended for APPROVAL with the following conditions:

A. Prior to installation of any landscaping, the applicant shall obtain plumbing permit for the proposed irrigation system from the Building Safety Division.

B. Prior to or at the time of a Planning final inspection, the property owner/applicant shall submit to the case planner a copy of the plumbing permit for the irrigation system installation that has been signed off by the Building Safety Division.

C. Prior to final Planning inspection or other final project sign off (as applicable), the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director for review and approval a certificate of completion in accordance with the Landscape Water Conservation Ordinance (MMC Section 17.53.030). The certificate shall include the property owner’s signed acceptance of responsibility for maintaining the landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the approved plans and MMC Section 17.53.030. (form attached) D. Prior to Final Plan Check Approval, if your property is serviced by the Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29, please provide landscape water use approval from that department.

For approval contact:

Roberto Perez Sandoval
Address: 23533 West Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA 90265-4804 Email: [email protected] (Preferred)
Phone: (310) 317-1389
Ron Dhillon
Address: 23533 Civic Center Way, Malibu, CA 90265
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (310) 317-0209
Please note this action may require several weeks. As such, the applicant should submit their approved landscape plans to DPW as soon as feasible in order to avoid a delay at plan check. 112
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDPWF 23-004
29738 Cuthbert Road
April 16, 2024

E. No planting or landscaping is permitted within the banks of the mapped blue line stream. The area between the banks lies within the jurisdiction of California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the bottom of the drainage is in the jurisdiction of US Army Corps of Engineers and Regional Water Quality Control Board. Any proposed changes in the drainage would require permits from each of the associated agencies.

F. Vegetation forming a view impermeable condition (hedge), serving the same function as a fence or wall, occurring within the side or rear yard setback shall be maintained at or below six feet in height. View impermeable hedges occurring within the front yard setback serving the same function as a fence or wall shall be maintained at or below 42 inches in height. Three sequential violations of this condition will result in a requirement to permanently remove the vegetation from the site.

G. Vegetation shall be situated on the property so as not to obstruct the primary view from private property at any given time (given consideration of its future growth).

H. Invasive plant species, as determined by the City of Malibu, are prohibited.

I. No non-native plant species shall be approved greater than 50 feet from the residential structure.

J. The landscape plan shall prohibit the use of building materials treated with toxic compounds such as creosote and copper arsenate.

K. Grading shall be scheduled only during the dry season from April 1 - October 31. If it becomes necessary to conduct grading activities from November 1 – March 31, a comprehensive erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval prior to issuance of a grading permit and implemented prior to initiation of vegetation removal and/or grading activities.

L. Grading/excavation/vegetation removal scheduled between February 1 - September 15 will require nesting bird surveys by a qualified biologist prior to initiation of such activities. Surveys shall be completed no more than five days from proposed initiation of site preparation activities. Should active nests be identified, a buffer area no less than 150 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be fenced off until it is determined by a qualified biologist that the nest is no longer active. A report discussing the results of the surveys shall be turned in to the City within two business days of completion of surveys.

M. Construction fencing shall be placed and indicated on the site plan. Construction fencing shall be installed prior to the beginning of construction and shall be maintained throughout the construction period to protect the site’s sensitive habitat areas including the blue line stream on the project site.

N. Night lighting from exterior and interior sources shall be minimized. All exterior lighting shall be low intensity and shielded so it is directed downward and inward so that there is no offsite glare or lighting of natural habitat areas. Up-lighting is prohibited. 113
City of Malibu Biology Review Sheet
CDPWF 23-004
29738 Cuthbert Road
April 16, 2024

2. PRIOR TO ISSUING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, the City Biologist shall inspect the project site and determine that all planning conditions to protect natural resources are in compliance with the approved plans.
-o0oIf you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact the City Biologist office at your earliest convenience.
cc: Planning Project file
Planning Department
114

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-3356 www.malibucity.org
FROM:

TO: City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator
City of Malibu Planning Department DATE: 10/26/2023
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Janek Dombrowa, JTD Architects
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1111 N Topanga Canyon Blvd.

APPLICANT PHONE #: (213) 470-2723
APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition, NOWTS, pool
Topanga, CA 90290
PROJECT NUMBER: CDPWF 23-004
JOB ADDRESS: 29738 CUTHBERT RD
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City of Malibu Environmental Health Reviewer
Conformance Review Complete for project submittals reviewed with respect to the City of Malibu Local Coastal Plan/Local Implementation Plan (LCP/LIP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC). The Conditions of Planning conformance review and plan check review comments listed on the attached review sheet(s) (or else handwritten below) shall be addressed prior to plan check approval.

Conformance Review Incomplete for the City of Malibu LCP/LIP and MMC. The Planning stage review comments listed on the City of Malibu Environmental Health review sheet(s) shall be addressed prior to conformance review completion.

OWTS Plot Plan: NOT REQUIRED
REQUIRED (attached hereto) REQUIRED (not attached)
Signature Date
Rev 141008
The applicant must submit to the City of Malibu Environmental Health Specialist to determine whether or not an onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) Plot Plan approval is required.

The Environmental Health Specialist may be contacted Tuesday and Thursday from 8:00 am to 11:00 am, or by calling (310) 456-2489, extension 364.
* Refer to Environmental Health conformance review conditions for building plan check dated 10-20-2022, attached hereto. The existing onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) and proposed OWTS must be shown on the final architectural and grading plans.

February 5, 2024
115

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-3356 www.malibucity.org
FROM:

TO: City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator
City of Malibu Planning Department REVISED DATE 09/13/2022 APPLICANT / CONTACT: Janek Dombrowa
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1111 N Topanga Cayn Blvd
APPLICANT PHONE #: (818)943-4198
APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (n) SFR
Topanga, CA 90290
PROJECT NUMBER: CDPWF 22-003
JOB ADDRESS: 29738 CUTHBERT RD
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: City of Malibu Environmental Health Reviewer
Conformance Review Complete for project submittals reviewed with respect to the City of Malibu Local Coastal Plan/Local Implementation Plan (LCP/LIP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC). The Conditions of Planning conformance review and plan check review comments listed on the attached review sheet(s) (or else handwritten below) shall be addressed prior to plan check approval.

Conformance Review Incomplete for the City of Malibu LCP/LIP and MMC. The Planning stage review comments listed on the City of Malibu Environmental Health review sheet(s) shall be addressed prior to conformance review completion.

OWTS Plot Plan: NOT REQUIRED
REQUIRED (attached hereto) REQUIRED (not attached)
Signature Date
The applicant must submit to the City of Malibu Environmental Health Specialist to determine whether or not an onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) Plot Plan approval is required.

The Environmental Health Specialist may be contacted Tuesday and Thursday from 8:00 am to 11:00 am, or by calling (310) 456-2489, extension 364.

Rev 141008
October 20, 2022
116
City of Malibu
Environmental Health ● Environmental Sustainability Department 23825 Stuart Ranch Road ꞏ Malibu, California ꞏ 90265-4861 Phone (310) 456-2489 ꞏ Fax (310) 456-7650 ꞏ www.malibucity.org

T:\Project Review\Cuthbert Rd\29738 Cuthbert Rd\CDPWF 22-003\221020_29738 Cuthbert Rd_CDPWF 22-003_EH conf ltr_CRC.docx Recycled Paper

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REVIEW SHEET

PROJECT INFORMATION
Applicant:
(name and email
address)
Janek Dombrowa
[email protected]
Project Address: 29738 Cuthbert Road
Malibu, California 90265
Planning Case No.: CDPWF 22-003
Project Description: (n) SFR
Date of Review: October 20, 2022
Reviewer: Matt Janousek Signature:

Contact Information: Phone: (310) 456-2489 Email: [email protected]

SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Architectural Plans: jtd: Plans dated 1-25-2022; revised plans dated 6-2-2022; revised plans dated 8-29- 2022 (received 9-13-2022)
Grading Plans: Pacific Coast Civil: Plans dated 1-24-2022 Landscape Plans: jtd: Plans dated 1-25-2022
OWTS Plan: Larry Young: OWTS plans dated 1-18-2022, 5-25-2022, 8-22-2022 OWTS Report: Larry Young: OWTS reports dated 1-18-2022, 5-25-2022, 8-22-2022; Percolation Test report dated 1-18-2022; DFU worksheets dated 1-18-2022 and 5-25-2022 Geology Report: GeoConcepts: Supporting Geologic and Geotechnical Report dated 1-11-2022 Miscellaneous: Compliance Agreement dated 1-24-2022
Previous Reviews: 3-17-2022, 6-14-2022

REVIEW FINDINGS
Planning Stage: CONFORMANCE REVIEW COMPLETE for the City of Malibu Local Coastal Program/Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and Malibu Municipal Code (MMC). The listed conditions of Planning stage conformance review and plan check review comments shall be addressed prior to plan check approval.

CONFORMANCE REVIEW INCOMPLETE for the City of Malibu LIP and MMC.

The listed Planning stage review comments shall be addressed prior to conformance review completion.

OWTS Plot Plan: NOT REQUIRED
REQUIRED (attached hereto) REQUIRED (not attached)
Based upon the project description and submittal information noted above, a conformance review was completed for a new advanced onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) proposed to serve the onsite wastewater treatment and disposal needs of the subject property. The proposed advanced OWTS meets the minimum requirements of the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) and the City of Malibu Local Coastal Program (LCP)/Local Implementation Plan (LIP). Please distribute this review sheet to all of the project consultants and, prior to final approval, provide a coordinated submittal addressing all conditions for final approval and plan check items.
117
City of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDPWF 22-003
29738 Cuthbert Road
October 20, 2022

T:\Project Review\Cuthbert Rd\29738 Cuthbert Rd\CDPWF 22-003\221020_29738 Cuthbert Rd_CDPWF 22-003_EH conf ltr_CRC.docx Recycled Paper The conditional conformance findings hereby transmitted complete the Planning stage Environmental Health review of the subject development project. In order to obtain Environmental Health final approval of the project OWTS Plot Plan and associated construction drawings (during Building Safety plan check), all conditions and plan check items listed below must be addressed through submittals to the Environmental Health office.

Conditions of Planning Conformance Review for Building Plan Check Approval:
1) Final Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Plot Plan: A final plot plan prepared by a City Registered OWTS Designer shall be submitted showing an OWTS design meeting the minimum requirements of the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) and the Local Coastal Program (LCP)/Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The plans must include all necessary construction details, the proposed drainage plan for the developed property, and the proposed landscape plan for the developed property. The OWTS Plot Plan shall show essential features of the OWTS, existing improvements, and proposed/new improvements. The plot plan must fit on an 11” x 17” sheet leaving a 5” left margin clear to provide space for a City-applied legend. 2) Final OWTS Design Report, Plans, and System Specifications: If the OWTS design and/or bedroom/drainage fixture unit counts are modified in any way subsequent to the Planning-stage review, then a final OWTS design report and large set of construction drawings with system specifications (four sets) shall be submitted to describe the OWTS design basis and all components proposed for use in the construction of the OWTS. All plans and reports must be signed by a City Registered OWTS Designer and the plans stamped by the project Geologist, Coastal Engineer, and Structural Engineer as applicable. The final OWTS design report and construction drawings shall be submitted with the designer’s signature, professional registration number, and stamp (if applicable).

The final OWTS design submittal shall contain the following information (in addition to the items listed above).
a. Required treatment capacity for wastewater treatment and disinfection systems. The treatment capacity shall be specified in terms of flow rate, gallons per day (gpd), and shall be supported by calculations relating the treatment capacity to the number of bedroom equivalents, plumbing drainage fixture units, and the subsurface effluent dispersal system acceptance rate. The drainage fixture unit count must be clearly identified in association with the design treatment capacity, even if the design is based on the number of bedrooms.

Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the treatment system shall be specified in the final design.
b. Sewage and effluent pump design calculations (as applicable). c. Description of proposed wastewater treatment and/or disinfection system equipment. State the proposed type of treatment system(s) (e.g., aerobic treatment, textile filter, ultraviolet disinfection, etc.); major components, manufacturers, and model numbers for “package” systems; and the design basis for engineered systems.
d. Specifications, supporting geology information, and percolation test results for the subsurface effluent dispersal portion of the onsite wastewater disposal system. This must include the proposed type of effluent dispersal system (drainfield, trench, seepage pit, subsurface drip, etc.) as well as the system’s geometric dimensions and basic construction features. Supporting calculations shall be presented that relate the results of soils analysis or percolation/infiltration tests to the projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate, including 118
City of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDPWF 22-003
29738 Cuthbert Road
October 20, 2022

T:\Project Review\Cuthbert Rd\29738 Cuthbert Rd\CDPWF 22-003\221020_29738 Cuthbert Rd_CDPWF 22-003_EH conf ltr_CRC.docx Recycled Paper any unit conversions or safety factors. Average and peak rates of hydraulic loading to the effluent dispersal system shall be specified in the final design. The projected subsurface effluent acceptance rate shall be reported in units of total gallons per day (gpd) and gallons per square foot per day (gpsf). Specifications for the subsurface effluent dispersal system shall be shown to accommodate the design hydraulic loading rate (i.e., average and peak OWTS effluent flow, reported in units of gpd). The subsurface effluent dispersal system design must take into account the number of bedrooms, fixture units, and building occupancy characteristics.
e. All OWTS design drawings shall be submitted with the wet signature and typed name of the OWTS designer. If the plan scale is such that more space than is available on the 11” x 17” plot plan is needed to clearly show construction details, larger sheets may also be provided (up to a maximum size of 18” x 22” for review by Environmental Health). [Note: For OWTS final designs, full-size plans for are also required for review by Building & Safety and Planning.]
3) Existing OWTS to be Abandoned: Final plans shall clearly show the locations of all existing OWTS components (serving pre-existing development) to be abandoned and provide procedures for the OWTS’ proper abandonment in conformance with the Malibu Municipal Code. 4) Worker Safety Note and Abandonment of Existing OWTS: The following note shall be added to the plan drawings included with the OWTS final design: “Prior to commencing work to abandon, remove, or replace existing Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) components an “OWTS Abandonment Permit” shall be obtained from the City of Malibu. All work performed in the OWTS abandonment, removal, or replacement area shall be performed in strict accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental and occupational safety and health regulatory requirements. The obtainment of any such required permits or approvals for this scope of work shall be the responsibility of the applicant and their agents.” 5) Reference Plans: Reference architectural and grading/drainage plans shall be submitted to Environmental Health during building plan check review of the proposed OWTS. Approvable building plans will show a new (fire rebuild) single family residence with no more than 8 bedrooms and 122 drainage fixture units, and a new tennis pavilion 0 bedrooms and 9 drainage fixture units. 6) Proof of Ownership: Proof of ownership of subject property shall be submitted. 7) Operations & Maintenance Manual: An operations and maintenance manual specified by the OWTS designer shall be submitted to the property owner and maintenance provider of the proposed advanced OWTS.
8) Maintenance Contract: A maintenance contract executed between the owner of subject property and an entity qualified in the opinion of the City of Malibu to maintain the proposed advanced onsite wastewater treatment system shall be submitted prior to Environmental Health approval. Please note only original “wet signature” documents are acceptable. 9) Advanced Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Covenant: A covenant running with the land shall be executed between the City of Malibu and the holder of the fee simple absolute as to subject real property and recorded with the City of Malibu Recorder’s Office. Said covenant shall serve as constructive notice to any future purchaser for value that the OWTS serving subject property is an advanced method of sewage disposal pursuant to the City of Malibu Municipal Code. 119
City of Malibu Environmental Health Review Sheet
CDPWF 22-003
29738 Cuthbert Road
October 20, 2022

T:\Project Review\Cuthbert Rd\29738 Cuthbert Rd\CDPWF 22-003\221020_29738 Cuthbert Rd_CDPWF 22-003_EH conf ltr_CRC.docx Recycled Paper Said covenant shall be provided by the City of Malibu Environmental Health Administrator. Please submit a certified copy issued by the City of Malibu Recorder. 10) Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant Approval: Project Geologist/Geotechnical Consultant final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator.
11) City of Malibu Geologist/Geotechnical Approval: City of Malibu geotechnical staff final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator. 12) City of Malibu Public Works Approval: City of Malibu Public Works final approval of the OWTS plan shall be submitted to the Environmental Health Administrator. 13) City of Malibu Planning Approval: City of Malibu Planning Department final approval of the OWTS plan shall be obtained.
14) Environmental Health Final Review Fee: A final fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be paid to the City of Malibu for Environmental Health review of the OWTS design and system specifications.
15) Operating Permit Application and Fee: In accordance with Malibu Municipal Code, an application shall be made to the Environmental Health office for an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System operating permit. An operating permit fee in accordance with the adopted fee schedule at the time of final approval shall be submitted with the application. -o0oIf you have any questions regarding the above requirements, please contact the Environmental Health office at your earliest convenience.
cc: Environmental Health file
Planning Department
120
10/20/22
121

GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW SHEET
Review Findings
Planning Review
The project is ACCEPTABLE from a geotechnical perspective, with the following comments to be addressed prior to building plan check stage completion.

The project is NOT ACCEPTABLE from a geotechnical perspective. The listed ‘Review Comments’ shall be addressed prior to acceptance.

City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road • Malibu, California 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 • Fax (310) 456-3356 • www.malibucity.org Project Information
Date: January 17, 2024 Review Log #: 678
Site Address: 29738 Cuthbert Road
Lot/Tract/PM #: Planning #: CDPWF 23-004
PVWF 21-034
Applicant/Contact: Janek Dombrowa,
[email protected]
Contact Phone #:

Project Type:
213-470-2723 Fax #:

BPC/GPC
#:

Planner: Aakash Shah
New single-family residence with additions > 10%; New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), swimming pool and spa, hardscape, trellis, grading, retaining walls
Submittal Information
Consultant(s) / Report
Date(s):
(Current submittal(s) in Bold.)
GeoConcepts, Inc. (Dermendjian, RCE 88261; Barrett, CEG 2088):
12-6-2023
GeoConcepts, Inc. (Walter, GE 2476; Barrett, CEG 2088): 1-10-2022, 1-11-2022
Lawrence Young (REHS # 3738): 12-1-2023, 1-18-2022 (2 reports) Architectural plans prepared by jtd architects dated August 8, 2023.

Total Grading Yardage Verification Certificate prepared by Richard E.

Doss dated April 7, 2022.

Grading plans prepared by Pacific Coast Civil, Inc. dated January 24, 2022.

OWTS Plot Plan prepared by Larry Young stamped on August 8, 2022.

Landscape plans prepared by Troller Mayer Associates, Inc. dated Previous Reviews: 11-22-2023; Ref: 4-21-2022; Environmental Health Review Sheet dated 10- 20-2022 (for CDPWF 22-003, withdrawn)
122
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MALW6473) – 2 –
Project submittals were reviewed from a geotechnical perspective for conformance with applicable codes, guidelines, and standards of practice, including the following current City adopted standards:
• City of Malibu Local Coastal Program – Land Use Plan and Local Implementation Plan (LCP-LUP and LCP-LIP)
• Malibu Municipal Code – Title 15, Buildings and Construction • City of Malibu Guidelines for the Preparation of Geotechnical Reports and Procedures for Report Submittal (November 2013) referred to herein as Geotechnical Report Guidelines In the case of conflicting requirements between the Geotechnical Guidelines and any other referenced standards, the latest standard will apply. The Applicant is responsible for complying with the submittal requirements for all Planning variances, as appropriate; any questions regarding variances should be directed to the case Planner.

Remarks:

The applicant has withdrawn the application for CDPWF 22-003 on 7-17-2023. The scope of the project has not changed from that reviewed and accepted by the City’s geotechnical consultants in the referenced review letter dated 4-21-2022.

The update geotechnical report and OWTS design letter were reviewed by the City’s consultants from a geotechnical perspective. The proposed development includes rebuilding the single-family residence destroyed in the Woolsey Fire larger than the pre-fire residence, and in a different footprint with a new second-floor, two-car garage, new infinity-edge swimming pool and spa, new driveway, new hardscape, and new OWTS. The new residence will consist of 8,492 square feet with a 1,085 square foot trellis area with toilet room and shower for tennis court viewing, and permeable garden sitting terraces totaling 3,060 square feet. The existing tennis court will remain, and will be repaired, as needed.

Grading consists of 3,000 cubic yards of removal and re-compaction (R & R); 232 cubic yards of cut and 161 cubic yards of fill under structure; 44 cubic yards of cut and 205 cubic yards of fill for safety; 88 cubic yards of cut and 455 cubic yards of fill non-exempt; and 457 cubic yards of import.

A new onsite wastewater treatment system (OWTS) will be installed on the property that consists of a 5,000-gallon septic tank with effluent filter to serve the residence, a new 1,500-gallon septic tank with effluent filter to serve to tennis court bathroom, three 3-foot x 80-foot leach trenches with 3 feet of rock, and 100% expansion consisting of three 3-foot x 80-foot leach trenches with 3 feet of rock. A blueline stream is mapped on the property.

The site is located within 500 feet of a mapped fault (Treiman, FER-229). A fault rupture hazard investigation (trench) was conducted by the Project Geotechnical Consultant in the referenced geotechnical report.
123
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MALW6473) – 3 –
Building Plan-Check Stage Review Comments:

1. Submit a fee of $1179.00 for the building plan check and $528 for the OWTS plan check to the City’s consulting geotechnical reviewers for final plan check review.

2. Provide a detail for the hydrostatic relief valve recommended by the Project Geotechnical Consultant on the swimming pool plans.

3. Clearly illustrate the limits and depths of the proposed over-excavation (R & R) grading on the grading plan, Sheet 2 of 3.

4. Reference the geotechnical report(s) on the cover sheet of the Grading plans.

5. Include the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations for the slot-cutting method along the property line on the Grading plans, as appropriate.

6. Submit foundation plans for review. Indicate the bearing material and depth for all foundation types on the foundation plans for the residence, garage, walls, and swimming pool/spa.

7. Include the following note on all the Foundation Plans: “All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of reinforcing steel.”

8. Include the following note on the foundation plans for the pool: “The Project Geotechnical Consultant shall prepare an as-built report documenting the installation of the pile foundation elements for the City’s files. The report shall include total depths of the piles, depth into the recommended bearing material, minimum required depth into the recommended bearing material, and a map depicting the locations of the piles.”

9. Section 7.4 of the City’s geotechnical guidelines requires a minimum thickness of 10 mils for vapor barriers beneath slabs-on-grade. The Project Geotechnical Consultant has recommended that the vapor barrier be a minimum thickness of 15 mils, conform to ASTM E1745 Class A requirements, and be installed in accordance with ASTM E1643. Building plans shall reflect the Consultant’s recommendation.

10. If retaining wall(s) are proposed, clearly depict the location of the proposed retaining wall(s) on the site plan. Include a retaining wall detail on the foundation plan that conforms to the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.

11. Submit a set of swimming pool and spa plans for review that conform to the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.

12. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests, a dry density and optimum moisture maximum curve(s), and a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms. Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map. This comment must be included as a note on the grading plans.

13. One set of final electronic OWTS plans incorporating the Project Geotechnical and Environmental Health Specialists’ recommendations and items in this review sheet must be reviewed and e-stamped and e-signed by the Project Engineering Geologist. The City’s geotechnical consultants will review the plans for conformance with the Project Geotechnical Consultants’ recommendations and items in this review sheet.

14. The final set of electronic grading, retaining wall, trellis, swimming pool and spa, and residence, plans (APPROVED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY) incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet must be reviewed and e-stamped and e-signed by the Project Geotechnical Engineer and Engineering Geologist. The City’s geotechnical consultants will review the plans for conformance with the Project Geotechnical Consultants’ recommendations and items in this review sheet.
124
City of Malibu Geotechnical Review Sheet
(MALW6473) – 4 –
Please direct questions regarding this review sheet to City’s Geotechnical consultants listed below.

Geotechnical Engineering Review by: 1-17-2024
Matthew Janousek, G.E. #3005, Exp. 12-31-2024 Date
Geotechnical Engineering Reviewer (805-370-8710)
Email: [email protected]
Engineering Geology Review by: 1-17-2024
Christopher Dean, C.E.G. #1751, Exp. 9-30-2024 Date
Engineering Geology Reviewer (408-656-3210)
Email: [email protected]
This review sheet was prepared by representatives of Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. and GeoDynamics, Inc., contracted through Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc., as an agent of the City of Malibu. 125
City of Malibu
– GEOTECHNICAL –

NOTES FOR BUILDING PLAN-CHECK
The following standard items should be incorporated into Building Plan-Check submittals, as appropriate:

1. One set of grading, retaining wall, swimming pool, spa, trellis, and residence plans, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations and items in this review sheet, must be submitted to City geotechnical staff for review. Additional review comments may be raised at that time that may require a response.

2. Show the name, address, and phone number of the Project Geotechnical Consultant(s) on the cover sheet of the Building Plans.

3. Include the following note on Grading and Foundation Plans: “Subgrade soils shall be tested for Expansion Index prior to pouring footings or slabs; Foundation Plans shall be reviewed and revised by the Project Geotechnical Consultant, as appropriate.”

4. Include the following note on the Foundation Plans: “All foundation excavations must be observed and approved by the Project Geotechnical Consultant prior to placement of reinforcing steel.”

5. The Foundation Plans for the proposed project shall clearly depict the embedment material and minimum depth of embedment for the foundations in accordance with the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations.

6. Show the onsite wastewater treatment system on the Site Plan.

7. Please contact the Building and Safety Department regarding the submittal requirements for a grading and drainage plan review.

8. A comprehensive Site Drainage Plan, incorporating the Project Geotechnical Consultant’s recommendations, shall be included in the Plans. Show all area drains, outlets, and non-erosive drainage devices on the Plans.

Water shall not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over descending slopes.

Grading Plans (as Applicable)

1. Grading Plans shall clearly depict the limits and depths of overexcavation, as applicable.

2. Prior to final approval of the project, an as-built compaction report prepared by the Project Geotechnical Consultant must be submitted to the City for review. The report must include the results of all density tests as well as a map depicting the limits of fill, locations of all density tests, locations and elevations of all removal bottoms, locations and elevations of all keyways and back drains, and locations and elevations of all retaining wall backdrains and outlets. Geologic conditions exposed during grading must be depicted on an as-built geologic map.

This comment must be included as a note on the grading plans.

Retaining Walls (As Applicable)

1. Show retaining wall backdrain and backfill design, as recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant, on the Plans.

2. Retaining walls separate from a residence require separate permits. Contact the Building and Safety Department for permit information. One set of retaining wall plans shall be submitted to the City for review by City geotechnical staff. Additional concerns may be raised at that time which may require a response by the Project Geotechnical Consultant and applicant.
126

PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW

REFERRAL SHEET
City of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Rd., Malibu, California CA 90265-4861 (310) 456-2489 FAX (310) 456-7650
FROM:

TO:

City of Malibu Planning Department
Public Works Department
REVISED DATE 01/25/2024
APPLICANT / CONTACT: Janek Dombrowa, JTD Architects
APPLICANT ADDRESS: 1111 N Topanga Canyon Blvd.

APPLICANT PHONE #: (213) 470-2723
APPLICANT FAX #:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition to the new house, landscape, pool and OWTS. The project scope has not changed from
what was previously withdrawn CDP.

Topanga, CA 90290
PROJECT NUMBER: CDPWF 23-004
JOB ADDRESS: 29738 CUTHBERT RD
TO: Malibu Planning Department and/or Applicant
FROM: Public Works Department
The following items described on the attached memorandum shall be addressed and resubmitted.

The project was reviewed and found to be in conformance with the City’s Public Works and LCP policies and CAN proceed through the Planning process.

SIGNATURE DATE
APPLICANT EMAIL: [email protected]
Rev 120910
2/6/2024
127
1 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - PLN and BPC Reviews/29738 Cuthbert Rd/CDPWF 23-004/Planning/The Public Works/2nd Review/29738 Cuthbert Rd CDPWF 23-004 COA.doc Recycled Paper
City of Malibu

M E M O R A N D U M
To: Planning Department
From: Public Works Department
Nadia Fahoum, Assistant Civil Engineer
Date: February 6, 2024
Re: Proposed Conditions of Approval for 29738 Cuthbert Rd, CDPWF 23-004 The Public Works Department has reviewed the plans submitted for the above referenced project.

Based on this review sufficient information has been submitted to confirm that conformance with the Malibu Local Coastal Plan (LCP) and the Malibu Municipal Code (MMC) can be attained.

Prior to the issuance of building and grading permits, the applicant shall comply with the following conditions.

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

1. This project proposes to construct improvements within the City’s right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the proposed work within the City’s right-of-way. For projects on Dume Drive, Grayfox Street, Fernhill Drive and Wildlife Road the City received a Safe Routes to School Grant for improving pedestrian safety. Any proposed street improvements along these streets shall consider the potential impact on the existing conditions, such as but not limited to decomposed granite and wood ties.

2. This project proposes to construct a new driveway within the City’s right-of-way. Prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading or building permit, the applicant shall obtain encroachment permits from the Public Works Department for the proposed driveway. The driveway shall be constructed of either 6-inches of concrete over 4-inch of aggregate base, or 4-inches of asphalt concrete over 6-inches of aggregate base. The driveway shall be flush with the existing grades with no curbs.

GRADING AND DRAINAGE

3. Clearing and grading during the rainy season (extending from November 1 to March 31) shall be prohibited for development LIP Section 17.3.1 that:
128
2 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - PLN and BPC Reviews/29738 Cuthbert Rd/CDPWF 23- 004/Planning/The Public Works/2nd Review/29738 Cuthbert Rd CDPWF 23-004 COA.doc Recycled Paper • Is located within or adjacent to ESHA, or
• Includes grading on slopes greater than 4:1
• Approved grading for development that is located within or adjacent to ESHA or on slopes greater than 4:1 shall not be undertaken unless there is sufficient time to complete grading operations before the rainy season. If grading operations are not completed before the rainy season begins, grading shall be halted and temporary erosion control measures shall be put into place to minimize erosion until grading resumes after March 31, unless the City determines that completion of grading would be more protective of resources

4. Exported soil from a site shall be taken to the County Landfill or to a site with an active grading permit and the ability to accept the material in compliance with the City’s LIP Section 8.3. A note shall be placed on the project that addresses this condition.

5. A grading and drainage plan shall be approved containing the following information prior to the issuance of grading permits for the project.
• Public Works Department General Notes
• The existing and proposed square footage of impervious coverage on the property shall be shown on the grading plan (including separate areas for buildings, driveways, walkways, parking, tennis courts and pool decks). • The limits of land to be disturbed during project development shall be delineated on the grading plan and a total area shall be shown on the plan. Areas disturbed by grading equipment beyond the limits of grading, areas disturbed for the installation of the septic system, and areas disturbed for the installation of the detention system shall be included within the area delineated.
• The grading limits shall include the temporary cuts made for retaining walls, buttresses, and over excavations for fill slopes and shall be shown on the grading plan.
• If the property contains trees that are to be protected they shall be highlighted on the grading plan.
• If the property contains rare and endangered species as identified in the resources study the grading plan shall contain a prominent note identifying the areas to be protected (to be left undisturbed). Fencing of these areas shall be delineated on the grading plan if required by the City Biologist.
• Private storm drain systems shall be shown on the grading plan. Systems greater than 12-inch diameter shall also have a plan and profile for the system included with the grading plan.
• Public storm drain modifications shown on the grading plan shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading permit.

6. A digital drawing (AutoCAD) of the project’s private storm drain system, public storm drain system within 250 feet of the property limits, and post-construction BMP’s shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. The digital drawing shall adequately show all storm drain lines, inlets, outlet, post129 3 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - PLN and BPC Reviews/29738 Cuthbert Rd/CDPWF 23- 004/Planning/The Public Works/2nd Review/29738 Cuthbert Rd CDPWF 23-004 COA.doc Recycled Paper construction BMP’s and other applicable facilities. The digital drawing shall also show the subject property, public or private street, and any drainage easements.

STORMWATER

7. A Local Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be provided prior to the issuance of the Grading/Building permits for the project. This plan shall include an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESCP) that includes, but not limited to:

Erosion Controls Scheduling
Preservation of Existing
Vegetation
Sediment Controls Silt Fence
Sand Bag Barrier
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Non-Storm Water Water Conservation Practices
Management Dewatering Operations
Waste Management Material Delivery and Storage
Stockpile Management
Spill Prevention and Control
Solid Waste Management
Concrete Waste Management
Sanitary/Septic Waste
Management
All Best Management Practices (BMP) shall be in accordance to the latest version of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) BMP Handbook. Designated areas for the storage of construction materials, solid waste management, and portable toilets must not disrupt drainage patterns or subject the material to erosion by site runoff.

8. A Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) is required for this project. Storm drainage improvements are required to mitigate increased runoff generated by property development. The applicant shall have the choice of one method specified within the City’s Local Implementation Plan Section 17.3.2.B.2. The SWMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the site. The SWMP shall identify the Site design and Source control Best Management Practices (BMP’s) that have been implemented in the design of the project (See LIP Chapter 17 Appendix A).

The SWMP shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to the issuance of the grading/building permits for this project.

9. A Water Quality Mitigation Plan (WQMP) is required for this project. The WQMP shall be supported by a hydrology and hydraulic study that identifies all areas contributory to the property and an analysis of the predevelopment and post development drainage of the 130
4 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - PLN and BPC Reviews/29738 Cuthbert Rd/CDPWF 23- 004/Planning/The Public Works/2nd Review/29738 Cuthbert Rd CDPWF 23-004 COA.doc Recycled Paper site. The WQMP shall meet all the requirements of the City’s current Municipal Separate Stormwater Sewer System (MS4) permit. The following elements shall be included within the WQMP:
• Site Design Best Management Practices (BMP’s)
• Source Control BMP’s
• Treatment Control BMP’s that retains on-site the Stormwater Quality Design Volume (SWQDv). Or where it is technical infeasible to retain on-site, the project must biofiltrate 1.5 times the SWQDv that is not retained on-site. • Drainage Improvements
• A plan for the maintenance and monitoring of the proposed treatment BMP’s for the expected life of the structure.
• A copy of the WQMP shall be filed against the property to provide constructive notice to future property owners of their obligation to maintain the water quality measures installed during construction prior to the issuance of grading or building permits.
• The WQMP shall be submitted to Public Works Department and the fee applicable at time of submittal for the review of the WQMP shall be paid prior to the start of the technical review. The WQMP shall be approved prior to the Public Works Department’s approval of the grading and drainage plan and or building plans.

The Public Works Department will tentatively approve the plan and will keep a copy until the completion of the project. Once the project is completed, the applicant shall verify the installation of the BMP’s, make any revisions to the WQMP, and resubmit to the Public Works Department for approval. The original signed and notarized document shall be recorded with the County Recorder. A copy of the WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the certificate of occupancy.

MISCELLANOUS

10.The developer’s consulting engineer shall sign the final plans prior to the issuance of permits.

11.The discharge of swimming pool, spa and decorative fountain water and filter backwash, including water containing bacteria, detergents, wastes, alagecides or other chemicals is prohibited. Swimming pool, spa, and decorative fountain water may be used as landscape irrigation only if the following items are met:
• The discharge water is dechlorinated, debrominated or if the water is disinfected using ozonation;
• There are sufficient BMPs in place to prevent soil erosion; and • The discharge does not reach into the MS4 or to the ASBS (including tributaries) Discharges not meeting the above-mentioned methods must be trucked to a Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Works.
131
5 https://malibucity.sharepoint.com/sites/LandDevelopment/Shared Documents/01 LD - PLN and BPC Reviews/29738 Cuthbert Rd/CDPWF 23- 004/Planning/The Public Works/2nd Review/29738 Cuthbert Rd CDPWF 23-004 COA.doc Recycled Paper The applicant shall also provide a construction note on the plans that directs the contractor to install a new sign stating “It is illegal to discharge pool, spa or water feature waters to a street, drainage course or storm drain per MMC 13.04.060(D)(5).” The new sign shall be posted in the filtration and/or pumping equipment area for the property. Prior to the issuance of any permits, the applicant shall indicate the method of disinfection and the method of discharging.
132
NN
ai u
133
UP
C
D
E B
A
F

PRE-FIRE TDSF PROPOSED DEVELOPEMENT
PRE-FIRE 200' FT FUEL
MODIFICATION ZONE PROPOSED 200' FT FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE 200'

E D C B A
F

F E D C B A
PROPOSED 200' FT FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE SHOWN IN GREEN
PRE-FIRE FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE: APPRX. 310,000 SFPOST-FIRE REDUCED FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE: APPRX. 239,000 SFREDUCED FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE IMPACT: APPRX. 71,000 SF

PRE-FIRE FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE SHOWN IN BLACK
3/64" = 1'-0" 1 PRE-FIRE TDSF 200' FT OFFSET
ATTACHMENT 3
134
ATTACHMENT 4
135
CHARLOTTE M FRIEZE 1
Planning Commission
Malibu, CA 90265
RE: Planning Commission Meeting of February 21, 2023
Agenda Item No. 5A - 29738 Cuthbert Road
Coastal Development Permit-Woolsey Fire No. 22-003
Sent Via Email: Planning [email protected] February 18, 2023 Honorable Commissioners:

Malibu Park is historically an equestrian neighborhood that is treasured by residents of all ages for its quiet rural character and peaceful lifestyle.

SIZE
The proposed structure at 29738 Cuthbert more than doubles the pre-Woolsey Fire residential structure on the site. The proposed house would adversely affect our quiet neighborhood’s friendly character as it is substantially larger than the properties on Harvester and Cuthbert.

The existing neighboring homes are substantially smaller:
29755 Harvester is 3,400 sf
29745 Harvester is 1,680 sf
29735 Harvester is 7,246 sf (per Zillow)
28725 Harvester’s final sf is 4,600 sf and the Planning Commission has asked the owners to reduce the size of their guest house by 90sf 29800 Cuthbert is under construction and will be less than 6,000 sf. 29824 Cuthbert is less than 4,000sf
I question what guidelines were used to determine the 8,500sf.

With 8 ensuite bedrooms, interior hallway ramps not steps and an elevator, one also questions the use for this building. Rumors have spread that it will be a rehab. This would shatter our quiet, equestrian neighborhood. Haven’t we suffered enough since the Woolsey Fire?
Before the Woolsey Fire we had dark skies in Malibu Park. With the construction of so many homes with glass walls, the area is aglow.

ATTACHMENT 5
136
CHARLOTTE M FRIEZE 2
Where is the landscape plan that would reduce the impact of such a large lightbox on our dark skies?
HEIGHT
The plans show that the roofline was raised unnecessarily. The project architect Janek Dombrowa, as an Assistant professor at USC, must teach his students to design to code. There is no reason he couldn’t have designed to Malibu’s 18- foot residential height limit. He certainly is not setting a good example for his students. Please enforce the existing height restrictions as you did for 29800 Cuthbert.

PARTY DECKS and FIRE HAZARDS.

Plans for 29738 Cuthbert including A5.2, A8.1, A.9 and A9.1 clearly show a large roof deck accessible from the second-floor gym as well as a staircase from the pool terrace.

Roof decks encourage outdoor gatherings attract loud party goers. The sound from such gatherings would shatter the nighttime peace and quiet for which Malibu Park is known.

Our neighborhood was almost completely destroyed by the Woolsey Fire.

All construction should be designed to prevent fires.

There is the unsafe possibility for portable fire pits, grills, tiki lights, heaters and other items that could send sparks into the wind including fireworks on July 4th.

As you are aware the velocity of the winds in our neighborhood has increased since the loss of thousands of trees. (We alone lost 300 on our property).

Without trees, not only sparks but sound travels unimpeded throughout the canyon.

Having just been through the Woolsey Fire, it is astonishing that the Planning Department would even consider approving such menacing outdoor spaces.

Last April the Planning Commission denied a roof deck at 29846 Harvester Road. This one at 29738 Cuthbert should also be denied. Like the roof deck at 29846 Harvester, this roof deck would be adjacent to a horse corral and stable that has yet to be rebuilt.
137
CHARLOTTE M FRIEZE 3
Roof Decks are a threat to Malibu’s peaceful lifestyle and clearly not in line with the Malibu Vision and Mission Statement. They also intrude upon neighbors’ privacy as people can look down into neighboring properties.

TENNIS COURT LIGHTS
The existing tennis court lights should be removed to comply with Malibu’s Dark Skies ordinance.

Site plan A1.1 states the 8 light standards are to be restored and the fixtures relamped.

This should be denied. It will not only disturb the neighboring homes and horse corrals but also the wildlife especially the owls that make this canyon their home.

The Dark Skies ordinance was approved for a reason!
Please protect our homes from potential fire hazards.

Please respect our peaceful lifestyle and preserve the rural character of Malibu Park as per the Malibu Vision and Mission statement.

Please do not approve the construction of this roof deck, roof heights above 18ft and require the removal of the tennis court lights.

Thank you,
Charlotte M. Frieze
138
City Of Malibu
23825 Stuart Ranch Road
Malibu, CA 90265

PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
Phone (310) 456-2489
www.malibucity.org
N඗ගඑඋඍ ඗ඎ Pඝඊඔඑඋ Hඍඉකඑඖඏ
The Malibu Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday, June 3, 2024, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Malibu City Hall, 23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, CA and via teleconference, for the project identified below.

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT-WOOLSEY FIRE NO. 23-004, SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 23-026, AND DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 24-020 - An application to allow for the construction of a 4,620 square-foot addition to a destroyed single-family residence approved under Planning Verification-Woolsey Fire No. 21-034, extension of the existing swimming pool and spa, reconfiguration of the existing driveway, hardscape, landscape, grading, improvements to the existing tennis court; demolition of existing hardscape and landscape, and installation of a new onsite wastewater treatment system; including a site plan review for construction of the residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height LOCATION / APN / ZONING: 29738 Cuthbert Rd / 4469-041-011 / Rural Residential-Two Acre (RR-2) APPLICANT / OWNE): JTD Architects / Malibo LLC
APPEALABLE TO: City Council and California Coastal Commission ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Categorical Exemption CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(e), 15301(l), 15303(d), 15303(e), and 15304(b)
APPLICATION FILED: October 26, 2023
CASE PLANNER: Aakash Shah, Contract Planner, [email protected] (310) 456-2489, ext. 385
A written staff report will be available at or before the hearing for the projects. All persons wishing to address the Commission regarding these matters will be afforded an opportunity in accordance with the Commission’s procedures. Copies of all related documents can be reviewed by any interested person at City Hall during regular business hours. Oral and written comments may be presented to the Planning Commission on, or before, the date of the meeting.

LOCAL APPEAL - A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council by an aggrieved person by written statement setting forth the grounds for appeal. An appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk within ten days following the date of action which the appeal is made and shall be accompanied by an appeal form and filing fee, as specified by the City Council. Appeal forms may be found online at www.malibucity.org/planningforms or in person at City Hall, or by calling (310) 456-2489, extension 246.

COASTAL COMMISSION APPEAL - An aggrieved person may appeal the Planning Commission’s approval directly to the Coastal Commission within 10 working days of the issuance of the City’s Notice of Final Action. More information may be found online at www.coastal.ca.gov or by calling 805-585-1800.

IF YOU CHALLENGE THE CITY’S ACTION IN COURT, YOU MAY BE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUES YOU OR

SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED TO THE CITY, AT OR PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.

RICHARD MOLLICA, Planning Director Date: May 9, 2024
ATTACHMENT 6
139
Site Plan Review Request Findings:

1. The project is consistent with the policies and provisions of the Malibu LCP.

The project has been reviewed for conformance and is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP.

2. The project does not adversely affect neighborhood character.

The proposed residence complies with the size, height, location, minimal grading, and residential development standards. The adjacent properties on the North side of Cuthbert Road have been oriented to the south to maximize ocean views. The neighborhood has residences that are one and two-story with varied size ranges and similar orientations to maximize views. There are no indications that the project, particularly the portions of the project that are higher than 18 feet, would have an adverse effect.

3. The project provides maximum feasible protection to significant public views as required by Chapter 6 of the Malibu LIP.

There are no significant public views of mountains, canyons, or the ocean over the property from any public viewing areas on or near the property which could be impacted by the project. However, the project proposes to create public views through the site to the ocean from Cuthbert Road.

4. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

The proposed project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law.

5. The project is consistent with the City's general plan and local coastal program.

The proposed project is consistent with the LCP .The proposed project is also consistent with the City’s General Plan and MMC.

6. The portion of the project that is in excess of 18 feet in height does not obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean, off-shore islands, Santa Monica Mountains, canyons, valleys or ravines from the main viewing area of any affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)(17).

The maximum height of the proposed project is 24 feet, which may be permitted with the site plan review. But as the property across the street is at a higher elevation, they will not obstruct the views. 140
ATTACHMENT 7

CITY OF MALIBU PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 24—39
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MALIBU, DETERMINING THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. AND APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT~WOOLSEY FIRE NO. 23-004 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 4.620 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO A DESTROYED SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED GARAGE APPROVED UNDER PLANNING VERIFICATION—WOOLSEY FIRE NO. 21—034‘ EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING SWIMMING POOL AND SPA, DRIVEWAY RECONFIGURATION‘ IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING TENNIS COURT, NEW HARDSCAPING, LANDSCAPING, GRADING, AND ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM; INCLUDING DEMOLITION PERMIT NO. 24—020 FOR THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE; AND SITE PLAN REVIEW NO. 23-026 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RESIDENCE OVER 18 FEET IN HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 24 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR A FLAT ROOF LOCATED IN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL. TWO-ACRE ZONING DISTRICT AT 29738 CUTHBERT ROAD (MALIBO, LLC).

The Planning Commission 0fth€ City ofMalibu does hereby findq order and resolve as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals.

A. On September 28. 2021, Planning Verification—Woolsey Fire (PVWF) No. 21-034 was approved for the in—kind replacement ofthe single—family residence and swimming pool.

B. On October 26. 2023. an application for Coastal Development Permit—Woolsey Fire (CDPWF) No. 23—004. Site Plan Review (SPR) No. 23—026 and Demolition Permit (DP) No. 24— 020 was submitted to the Planning Department by applicant. Janek Dombrowa. on behalf of the property owner. Malibo LLC. The application was routed to the City Biologist. City Environmental Health Administrator. City geotechnical consultant reviewers. City Public Works Department. Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD) and Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 29 (WD29) for review.

C. On April 22. 2024. a Notice of Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Application was posted on the subject property.

D. On April 25. 2024. the CDP application was deemed complete for processing.

E. On May 9. 2024. a Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Malibu and was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a SOO—foot radius ofthe subject property.

F. On June 3. 2024. the item was continued to the July 15. 2024. Regular Planning Commission meeting.

G. On .Iuly 15. 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application. reviewed and considered the staff report. reviewed and considered written reports. public testimony. and other information in the record. Commissioner Peak moved. and 141
Resolution NO 24—39

Commissioner Smith seconded a motion to direct staff to return with a resolution for approval of Coastal Development Permit—Woolsey Fire No. the subject application including the following conditions of approval: 1) remove tennis court lighting; 2) comply with Dark Sky Ordinance; 3) Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area restoration shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to the satisfaction ofthe California Depaitment of Fish and Wildlife; 4) a private party deed restriction shall be recorded to prevent an alcohol. drug or psychiatric recovery or sober living rehabilitation facility from being located on the property in the future; 5) a deed restriction shall be recorded to prevent future use of the property for short-term rentals; and 6) restrict lighting on the rooftop decks to one Dark Sky compliant luminaire per deck. The question was called, and the motion carried 3—2i Chair Mazza and Commissioner Hill dissenting.

H. On August 5, 2024, a resolution approving the subject application was presented to the Planning Commission for adoption.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review.

Pursuant to the authority and criteria contained in CEQA, the Planning Director has analyzed the proposed project. The Planning Director found that this project is listed among the classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions ofCEQA pursuant to Sections 15301(e), (l) — Existing Facilities, 15303(d), (e) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, 15304(b) — Minor Alterations to Land. The Planning Director has further determined that none of the six exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply to this project (CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2).

SECTION 3. Coastal Development Permit Findings.

Based on substantial evidence contained within the record and pursuant to the Local Coastal Program (LCP) Local Implementation Plan (LIP) including Sections 13.7(B) and 13.9, the Planning Commission adopts the analysis in the agenda report incorporated herein. the findings of fact below, and approves CDPWF No. 23—004 for the construction of a 4,620 square foot addition to a destroyed single-family residence with an attached garage approved under PVWF No. 21—034. extension of the existing swimming pool and spa. driveway reconfiguration. improvements to the existing tennis court. new hardscaping. landscaping, grading. and OWTS; including DP No. 24-020 for the demolition ofan existing hardscape and landscape; and SPR No. 23—026 for construction ofthe residence over 18 feet in height not to exceed 24 feet in height for a flat roof located in the Rural Residential. Two—Acre (RR—2) zoning district at 29738 Cuthbert Road.

The project is consistent with the LCP’s zoning. grading. cultural resources. water quality, and wastewater treatment requirements. With the inclusion of the site plan review. the project. as conditioned. has been determined to be consistent with all applicable LCP codes. standards, goals. and policies. The required findings are made herein.

A. General Coastal Development Permit (LIP Chapter l3)

1. The project is located in the RR-2 residential zoning district. an area designated for residential uses. The proposed project is for additions to the existing residence approved under the Planning Verification and other exterior site improvements. The Planning Department. City 142
Resolution NO 24-39

Biologist, City Environmental Health Administraton City geotechnical consultant reviewers. LACFDq City Public Works Department and WD29 reviewed the project for conformance with the LCP. As discussed herein. based on submitted reports‘ project plans. visual analysis and site investigation, the proposed project. as conditioned, conforms to the LCP in that it meets all applicable residential development standards inclusive ofthe site plan review.

2. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the proposed project conforms to the public access and recreational policies in Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act as the subject property offers no direct or indirect public beach access. The proposed development will not interfere or block existing public access to the beach.

3. The proposed project meets the development policies of the LCP and MMC inclusive ofthe requested SPR and has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative. The proposed residence has been sited and designed to limit disturbance of the property. The addition to the approved single—family residence is away from the stream. Therefore, the proposed project has been determined to be the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative.

B. Site Plan Review Findings for Construction in Excess of 18 Feet in Height (LIP Section 13.27) l. The project has been reviewed for conformance with all relevant policies and provisions of the LCP. Based on submitted reports, visual impact analysis, and detailed site investigations, the project is consistent with all policies and provisions of the LCP and MMC inclusive ofthe site plan review.

2. The proposed replacement structure complies with the size, height, location. grading and residential development standards of the LCP and MMC. consistent with the RR-2 zoning designation. The majority ofthe development in the surrounding area was destroyed in the 2018 Woolsey Fire. To date. l l of the 24 properties within 500 feet ofthe subject property that that were destroyed are currently taking part in the City’s reconstruction efforts. The other affected properties have not yet submitted applications.

Lot sizes and homes in the Malibu Park neighborhood varied in size historically. as noted in the General Plan‘s description of the neighborhood. The adjacent properties on the north side of Cuthbert Road have historically been oriented away from the road to maximize ocean views. Story poles were placed on the subject parcel to demonstrate the project's potential for aesthetic changes to the neighborhood relative to siting. height. and bulk. Staff visited the site to inspect the story poles after installation. As demonstrated by the story poles. the project's location on the site, height and bulk is similar to other development in the adjacent area in that the neighborhood has historically been residentially developed with single and two-story residences with varied size ranges and similar orientation to maximize views toward the Pacifi; Ocean. Correspondence from neighbors were received objecting to the size and height ofthe residence, the outdoor patio. rooftop decks, and outdoor lighting for the tennis court. The applicant has provided analysis of the neighborhood. which shows that there are single-family residences that are similar types of projects within the neighborhood. There are no indications that the project. particularly the portions ofthe project that are higher than 18 feet. would have an adverse effect on neighborhood character.

J. There are no significant public views ofmountains. canyons. or the ocean over the ., 143
Resolution NO 24—39

property from any public Viewing areas on or near the property which could be impacted by the applicant’s project. The surrounding neighborhood is similarly developed with residential uses. Based on staff‘s site investigation. photost review ofthe architectural plans and the nature ofthe surrounding area, the project. as proposed and conditioned will have no significant adverse visual impacts to public views due to project design and location.

4. The proposed project will comply with all applicable requirements of State and local law and is conditioned to comply with any relevant approvals. permits and licenses from the City of Malibu and other related agencies.

5. The proposed project is consistent with the LCP in that the property is located in an area that has been identified and zoned for residential use and complies with all applicable development standards. The proposed project is also consistent with the City‘s General Plan and MMC. The goals and policies ofthe General Plan intend to maintain rural residential character in this area, and the zoning standards of the MMC implement those goals. All components of the project are consistent with these goals and standards inclusive ofthe site plan review. 6, The proposed development is intilling residential development that is consistent with characteristics of neighboring properties. The maximum height of the proposed project is 24 feet which may be permitted with the inclusion of a site plan review. A Notice ofApplication was mailed to all property owners and occupants within a 500-‘foot radius and staffdid not receive any comments regarding view obstruction. presumably because surrounding properties have views oriented in a different direction. away from the project. Based on staff‘s evaluation and site inspections, it was determined that the proposed project will not obstruct visually impressive scenes of the Pacific Ocean. offshore islands. Santa Monica Mountains. canyons. valleys. or ravines from the main viewing area ofany affected principal residence as defined in MMC Section 17.40.040(A)( l 7).

C. Hazards (LIP Chapter 9)
l. Evidence in the record demonstrates that the project will neither be subject to nor increase the instability ofthe site from geologic. flood. or flre hazards. The proposed development is suitable for the intended use provided that the certified engineering geologist and/or geotechnical engineer’s recommendations and governing agency‘s building codes are followed.

2. The project. as designed. conditioned. and approved by the geotechnical consulting reviewers and the City Public Works Department. does not have any significant adverse impacts on the site stability or structural integrity from geologic or fire hazards due to the project design.

3. The project. as conditioned. is the least environmentally damaging alternative.

4. The proposed development has been analyzed for the hazards listed in LIP Chapter 9 by the Planning Department. City Biologist. City Environmental Health Administrator. City geotechnical consultant reviewers. City Public Works Department. and LACFD. These specialists and agency determined that the proposed project does not impact site stability or structural integrity. There are no feasible alternatives to the proposed development that would result in less site disturbance. .‘

5. The proposed project. as designed and conditioned. will not have adverse impacts on sensitive resources. 144
Resolution NO 24—39